Loading...
Backup Documents 10/23/2001 RBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 23, 2001 Naples Daily News Naples, F! 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily New' --- - - - --- - - - -- ---------- +------- - - - --- - - - -- -- - -- BOARD Or COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHRIS HORTON PO BOX 413016 NA ?LES FL 34101 -3016 REFERENCE: 001230 #102611 58334397 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEE State of Florida County of Collier Before we undersigned authority, personally appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of tine Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples in CoLLier County, FLorida: that the attached -opy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affianz further says that the said Naples Dail;,, News is a newspaper published at i4apLes, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said. newspaper has heretofore been c ntinuously published in said ColLier Cr,unty, il::rida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding tha first publicatit_n of the attached copy of adverti:.ement; and affiant further says that she ha:. nei'.her paid nor promised r,ny person, firm or corporation 3n•; discount, rebate, commission cr refund for the purpose of securing this adver'- isement for pubLict:or, i, one said new,pahe•. PUBLISHED ON: 1021 AD :PACE: 56.000 INCh FILcC ON: 10/22/01 Signature of Afff iant Swor :. a 3ubsc:ribed b 2ne thisr d f PersonaLly known by me �.►sr Donna Chesney MY Commission DD068336 OF Expires September 11, 2005 N i� nNomi Tray n praa, Florida, to coed the business of Collier Coun- 7ty at the above stated time and date. Copies of -the agenda forsoid� ,b L;� ess and ma Ibc e ob- matldonaOtmflcePlo4atedd on the First Floor Doff the W. Harmon Turner Bulldlnr�p� Any person who Betid- es to appeal a dedslon of this Board will need a re- cpoerd of to proceedlnos theeraeifore° need two ensure that a verbatim record of the [xococeerde_ re- cord Is made, wh cord includes the psp wwh� the appeal to be BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION COLLIE FLORIDA James D. Carter, Ph. D, DWIGHT�E. BROCK, CLERK By. /s/ Maureen Kenyon Deoutv Clerk -._ -_- COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA October 23, 2001 NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99 -22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS ". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY 1 October 23, 2001 FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 34112, (941) 774 -8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. Pastor G. Dale Benson, Naples First Church of the Nazarene 2. AGENDA AND MINUTES Approved and /or Adopted with changes— 510 A. Approval of today's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended 3. PROCLAMATIONS A. Proclamation for Red Ribbon Week to be recognized during the week of October 20 -31, 2001. To be accepted by Bob Hignite, (David Lawrence Center); Marlene E. Strollo (Informed Families); Youth from SWAT (Students Working Against Tobacco) and Paula Arrubla (Health Department). Adopted - 510 B. Proclamation to support the application for grant funding to the Florida Communities Trust by the Conservancy of Southwest Florida for the acquisition of Little Palm Island. (Commissioner Carter) Adopted — 510 4. SERVICE AWARDS Presented Five -Year Attendees: 1) Mohan Thampi, Public Utilities Engineering 2) Susan Murray, Planning Services 3) Kenneth Dozier, Parks and Recreation 4) Alicia Abbott, Public Utilities Engineering 5) Jonnie Ferrell, Social Services 6) Linda Ravita, Social Services 2 October 23, 2001 7) Susan Anderson, Library 8) William Sims, Fleet Management Ten -Year Attendees: 9) Henrietta Bucholtz, Emergency Medical Services 10) Anthony Duesterhoeft, Fleet Management 11) Stanley Chrzanowski, Community Development Fifteen -Year Attendees: 12) John Yonkosky, Utility Billing 13) Scott Fuller, Wastewater Collections 14) Erin Percival, Emergency Medical Services 15) Dale Waller, Wastewater 16) Gerald Ballard, Building Review 17) William Litsinger Jr., Planning Services Twentv -Year Attendees: 18) Francisco Llorca, Road and Bridge 19) Dennis Mazzone, Code Enforcement 20) Mary Ann Mehlmouer, Library 5. PRESENTATIONS Added Presentation by Guy Carlton, Collier County Tax Collector, of FY '01 turn back funds (Staff Request) Presented Continued to November 27, 2001 A. Recommendation to recognize Beverly Fields, Lieutenant, Emergency Medical Services, as Employee of the Month for October 2001. Added B. Accept a $15,645 donation from Herbert J. and Margaret S. Sugden to the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department. (Staff Request) Accepted 3 October 23, 2001 Added C. Acceptance of $100,000 donation from Herbert J. and Margaret S. Sugden to the Collier County Public Library. (Staff Request) Accepted 6. PUBLIC PETITIONS AND COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS A. Public Comments on General Topics Les Lezack re road construction — Chairman to write letter to Sheriff Hunter re safety issues. Cary Burris suggestions re natural gas energy. Bob Krasowski re proposals for organic portions of the County's waste. B. Public Petition to discuss the 2002 July 4'h Festival and Fireworks Display. Discussed 7. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 8. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. This item has been deleted. B. THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE OCTOBER 9 2001 BCC MEETING AND IS FURTHER CONTINUED TO THE NOVEMBER 13, 2001 BCC MEETING. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition PUDA - 2001 -AR -500, R. Bruce Anderson, Esquire, of Young, VanAssenderp, Varnadoe and Anderson, P.A., representing the Skinner and Broadbent Development Company Inc., Contract Purchaser, requesting to repeal the current Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD and to adopt a new PUD for the purpose of adding self - storage (SIC #4225) to the list of permitted uses and removing some of the permitted uses including restaurants, fast food restaurants, food markets and automobile service stations from the community commercial tracts of the PUD, the subject property is located in the East side of Collier Boulevard (CR -951), approximately 400 feet North of Tamiami Trail and Collier Boulevard Intersection, in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier 4 October 23, 2001 County, Florida, the Falling Waters PUD consists of 74.37 acres, the Community Commercial Tracts consist of 4+ acres. C. This item has been deleted. Continued to November 13, 2001 D. THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE SEPTEMBER 25 2001 BCC MEETING. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members PUD - 2000-21, Robert L. Duane, A.I.C.P., of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Robert Vocisano and Angelo Favretto, requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Terafina PUD for a maximum of 850 residential dwelling units, golf course, and clubhouse, for property located approximately 1.5 miles east of I -75, one mile north of Immokalee Road (C.R. 846), in Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 646.5+ acres. E. This item has been deleted. F. THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE OCTOBER 9 2001 BCC MEETING. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members Petition PUD - 92- 08(1), Dwight Nadeau of RWA Inc., representing William T. Higgs, requesting the petitioner seeks to repeal the current White Lake Industrial Park PUD and to adopt a new PUD known as White Lake Corporate Park PUD, for the purpose of reducing the conservation area from 11.3 acres to 9.3 acres, the lake area from 44.1 acres to 36.6 acres, the open space area by 10.8 acres, in order to increase the industrial land use area from 67.4 acres to 77.3 acres, and to create a 7.8 acres commercial tract, the subject property is located in the northeast quadrant of Collier Boulevard and Interstate I -75, immediately north of Landfill Road, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, this site consists of 144.4 acres. Ord. 2001 -59 adopted with stipulations — 510 G. This item has been deleted. 9. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A. Appointment of member to the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council. Res. 2001414 appointing Carolyn D. Spatta — Adopted 5/0 5 October 23, 2001 B. Appointment of member to the Forest Lakes Roadway & Drainage Advisory Committee. Res. 2001 -415 appointing Roger Somerville — Adopted 510 C. Appointment of members to the Historical Archaeological Preservation Board. Res. 2001416 appointing Diane Gonzalez and Joanne Quinn — Adopted 510 Limitations on terms waived D. Appointment of members to the Workforce Housing Advisory Committee. Res. 2001 -417 according to the executive summary with the exeption of Mark Strain, Bill West, and Suzanne Orschell — Adopted 510 E. Appointment of members to the Health and Human Services Advisory Committee. Res. 2001 -418 according to the executive summary with the exception of Peter Iascono — Adopted 510 F. Appointment of one commissioner and one alternate commissioner to serve on the Canvassing Board for the year 2002. Commissioner Coletta appointed as Primary and Commissioner Henning as Alternate (Consensus) Moved from Item #16I1 G. Commissioner request for approval for payment to attend Lake Trafford's New Beginning Celebration Dinner. (Commissioner Coletta) Approved — 510 10. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT A. Presentation of Capital Project Tracking Model for County Projects. (Tom Wides, Interim Public Utilities Administrator) Presented B. This item has been deleted. C. Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners authorize a one week fund raising program during the week beginning with Veteran's Day (November 12, 2001) throughout all major County Government Facilities to generate donations for the American Red Cross in support of September 11th Relief. (Thomas W. 011iff, County Manager) 6 October 23, 2001 Res. 2001 -420 - Adopted and CAT fees waived — 510 D. Resolution relating to the County Incentive Grant Program (CIGP), Chapter 339.2817 of the Florida Statutes. (Norman Feder, Transportation Administrator) Res. 2001419 — Adopted 5/0 E. Request the Board accept a donation of American Flag Banners for the US41 East Street Light Poles and authorize the installation. (Norman Feder, Transportation Administrator) Approved — 510 F. This item has been deleted. G. Authorize and approve purchase of last remaining out - parcel owned by Ricky Stauffer in Barefoot Beach Preserve. (Leo Ochs, Assistant County Manager) Staff recommendation to purchase property approved and staff to continue to pursue grant reimbursement process — 4/1 Moved from Item #16A14 H. Third Amendment to the 2001 Tourism Agreement between Collier County and the Tourism Alliance of Collier County to include expenditures up to $500,000 for the Disaster Recovery Marketing Plan for Collier County from the Disaster Recovery Fund. Approved — 5/0 Added I. Authorization for the BCC Chairman to sign and send letters to the Collier County legislative delegation requesting their opposition to proposals to increase the County portion of Medicaid nursing home and hospital costs. (Staff Request) Approved - 510 11. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 14. FUTURE AGENDAS 15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 7 October 23, 2001 Discussion re televising the Taxpayers Action Group 10/29 meeting regarding sales tax issue — Meeting not to be televised. Commissioner Mac'Kie resigned as Vice - Chairman Commissioner Coletta selected as Vice - Chairman — 510 --------------- - - - - -: ------------ - - - - -: - -: ------- - - - - -- 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will - - - - - -- be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. ------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Approved and /or Adopted with changes — 510 A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICFS Continued 1) Execute Satisfaction of Code Enforcement Lien established in Collier County v. Blas Valsez and Roberto Soto. 2) Award of Bid 01 -3276 for Records Management Services. Awarded to File Stor 3) Approval of an Addendum to Lease Agreement between CPOC Realty, LLC and Collier County for office space utilized by Housing and Urban Improvement. 4) THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE OCTOBER 9 2001 BCC MEETING. Request to approve for recording the Final Plat of "Berkshire Commons Parcel 1, 2, 3 ". 5) Request to grant Final Acceptance of the Roadway, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements for the Final Plat of "Pelican Strand Replat — T'. Res. 2001 -397 6) Request to grant Final Acceptance of the Roadway, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements for the Final Plat of "Pelican Strand Replat —1 B ". Res. 2001 -398 s October 23, 2001 7) Request to grant Final Acceptance of the Roadway, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements for the Final Plat of "Pelican Strand Replat — 4 ". Res. 2001 -399 8) Request to grant Final Acceptance of the Roadway, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements for the Final Plat of "Pelican Strand Replat — 5 ". Res. 2001400 9) Request to grant Final Acceptance of the Roadway, Drainage, Water and Sewer Improvements for the Final Plat of "North Collier Industrial Center ". Res. 2001 401 10) Agreement with Quail II Development to pay for improvements to the Cocohatchee Weir. 11) Request to approve for recording the Final Plat of "Majorca Unit Tivo at Fiddler's Creek ". 12) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve Work Order WMI- FT -01 -08 within Contract 99 -2981 with Wilson Miller for fixed term land surveying and photogrametric services. In the amount of $108,600 13) CARNY- 2001 -AR -1604, Reverend Joseph Spinelli, O.S.A., Pastor of the St. Elizabeth Seton Parish, requesting a permit to conduct a carnival /festival on November 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2001, on their property located at 5325 281h Avenue SW to raise funds for the operation of the Church and Elementary School in Golden Gate. Carnival Permit 2001 -06 Moved to Item #10H 14) Third Amendment to the 2001 Tourism Agreement between Collier County and the Tourism Alliance of Collier County to include expenditures up to $500,000 for the Disaster Recovery Marketing Plan for Collier County from the Disaster Recovery Fund. B. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 1) Requesting direction to revise the enabling ordinance that sets forth the requirements for the Immokalee Beautification Municipal Services 9 October 23, 2001 Taxing Unit (MSTU) Advisory Committee. 2) Implement an automated central irrigation control system for managing roadway beautification improvements. With Contemporary Controls & Communications, Inc. 3) Resolution requesting the State of State of Florida to retain US41 in Eastern Collier County as a State Road under the Florida Department of Transportation. Res. 2001 -402 4) Approve an Agreement for Sale and Purchase to acquire property for the benefit of the Wiggins Bay Drainage Basin. 5) Award of RFPO1 -3280 "Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights ". To E. B. Simmonds Electric, American Lighting Signalization and Designed Traffic Installation 6) Approve the Acquisition of Perpetual, Non - Exclusive, Road Right -of- Way, Utility, Drainage, Maintenance and Temporary Construction Interests by easement for the future construction of four - laning roadway improvements for County Barn Road between Davis Boulevard (SR 84) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road (CR 864) CIE No. 33. 7) Approve Work Order No. WD -055 with Douglas N. Higgins Inc., for replacement of a culvert on Goodland Road, Project No. 60047. In the amount of $194,466.50 Moved to Item #16C17 Added 8) City - County Emergency Wastewater Interconnect. 9) Request approval for temporary "No Through Truck" signs at specified locations adjacent to the Naples Park neighborhood. (Commissioner Carter request) Res. 2001 -403 10 October 23, 2001 Added 10) Request to waive the right -of -way permit fees for the Tropicana Boulevard Beautification Project, as requested by the Golden Gate Beautification Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) Advisory Committee (Staff request) C. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1) Approve a Change Order to Contract 00 -3033, Hideaway Beach T -Groin Construction and the Associated Tourist Development Council Grant Application, Project 10257. With Douglas Higgins in the amount of $53,125 2) Approve funds for expenses related to Water Festival 2002. Res. 2001 -404 In the amount of $12,000 3) Approve Addendum No. 2 to Effluent Agreement by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Ex- Officio Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, and Windstar Club, Inc., a Florida Corporation. 4) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Lien for Solid Waste Residential Account wherein the County has received payment and said lien is satisfied in full for the 1996 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment. Res. 2001 -405 5) Approval and Execution of Satisfactions of Notice of Claim of Lien for sanitary sewer system impact fee. 6) Approval and Execution of Satisfactions of Notice of Promise to pay and agreement to extend payment of water and/or sewer system impact fees. 7) Approve a Budget Amendment renewing funds for acquisition of land from Willing Sellers for properties adjacent to the existing Naples Landfill. 8) Award Contract for "Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance" to Water Treatment and Controls Company. 11 October 23, 2001 9) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Lien for Solid Waste Residential Account wherein the County has received payment and said lien is satisfied in full for the 1992 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment. Res. 2001 -406 10) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Lien for Solid Waste Residential Account wherein the County has received payment and said lien is satisfied in full for the 1993 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment. Res. 2001 -407 11) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Lien for Solid Waste Residential Account wherein the County has received payment and said lien is satisfied in full for the 1994 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment. Res. 2001 -408 12) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Lien for Solid Waste Residential Account wherein the County has received payment and said lien is satisfied in full for the 1995 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessment. Res. 2001 -409 13) Approve the Satisfaction of Lien documents filed against Real Property for abatement of nuisance and direct the Clerk of Courts to record same in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 14) Approve a Professional Engineering Design Work Order with Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., for a new reverse osmosis raw water supply wells for the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant, Project 70075. In the Amount of $180,616 15) Approve Committee Selection of Firms for Contract #01 -3272 "Production of Beach Compatible Sand ". Awarded to Big Island Excavating, Inc. and E. R. Johns, Inc. 16) Approve a Professional Engineering Work Order with Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., for wellfield remediation for the reverse osmosis raw water supply wells for the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant. 12 October 23, 2001 In the amount of $212,036 Moved from Item #16B8 17) City - County Emergency Wastewater Interconnect D. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Request Board of County Commissioner approval of Work Order BSSW -00 -15 to enable the Library to hire an architectural firm to complete plans for the Immokalee Branch Library Expansion. With Barany, Schmitt, Summer, Weaver & Partners, Inc. in the amount of $76,350 2) Approve Grant Application for improvements and expansion of dock, picnic shelter and restroom at Bayview Park. 3) Approval of interlocal agreement with District School Board of Collier County for School Nursing Services. E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1) Approve an additional thirty (30) day extension of Contract #98 -2828, Records Management Services. 2) To approve a Lease Agreement between Solar, L.C., and Collier County for warehouse space. 3) Approval of a First Amendment to Standard Agreement for Central Office Space Lease and License between Collier County and Sprint - Florida, Incorporated, concerning a county- occupied communications tower. 4) Approve enhanced security measures at the Main Government Complex and Development Services Building. F. EMERGENCY SERVICES 1) Approve Budget Amendments to appropriate revenue for a Florida Department of Agriculture, Division of Forestry Matching (50 %) Grant Award and to transfer and appropriate matching funds from the Isles of Capri Fire Control District Reserve for contingencies. 13 October 23, 2001 Added 2) Approve a Memorandum of Understanding between the Ochopee Fire Control District and the National Park Service, Big Cypress National Preserve. 3) Approve Budget Amendments to appropriate revenue for a Florida Department of Agriculture, Division of Forestry Matching (50 %) Grant Award and to transfer and appropriate matching funds from the Ochopee Fire Control District Reserve for Contingencies. 4) (This item was continued from the September 11, 2001 meeting) Approval of a resolution amending the Collier County Ambulance Service User Fees (Staff request) Resolution 2001 -410 G. COUNTY MANAGER 1) Approval of a $300,000 Advance to the Tax Collector for Land Acquisition required due to the assumption of Drivers License Operations from the State of Florida. H. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 1) Budget Amendment for Marco Island Executive Airport Rotating Beacon. I. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved to Item #9G 1) Commissioner request for approval for payment to attend Lake Trafford's New Beginning Celebration Dinner. (Commissioner Coletta) J. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1) Miscellaneous items to file for record with action as directed. K. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 14 October 23, 2001 1) Authorize an Agreement with the City of Naples for Election Services. L. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the payment of surplus proceeds from the sale of a mobile home located at Lot #94, in Southwind Village, 94 Cleveland Court, Naples, Florida, pursuant to §715. 109, Florida Statutes. 2) Approve the Settlement Agreement relating to Parcels No. 175A, 575A, and 575B, in the Lawsuit Styled Collier County v. Hiwasse, Inc., Case No. 01- 1088 -CA. 3) Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the easement acquisition of Parcel 106 in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. Joan F. Tobin, et al., (Traffic Signal Easement, Project No. 60171). Staff to deposit $1,297.00 into the Registry of the Courts 4) Approve the agreed order awarding expert fees relative to the easement acquisition of Parcel 168 in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. James R. Nash, et al, Case No. 01- 0757 -CA (Livingston Road, Project No. 60071). Staff to deposit $9,451.80 into the Registry of the Courts 5) Approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the easement acquisition of Parcel No. 271 in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. Jeffrey Gargiulo, et al, (Golden Gate Boulevard, Project No. 63041). Staff to deposit $140.00 into the Registry of the Courts 6) Authorize the making of an Offer of Judgment to Respondent, Joseph DeLucia, Trustee, for Parcel 199 in the amount of $2,000.00 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. Joseph DeLucia, Trustee, et al, Case No. 00- 0938 -CA, Project No. 63041. Staff to deposit $1,000.00 into the Registry of the Courts 7) Authorize the making of an Offer of Judgment to Respondents, Margery Baker and Fred Abdner Lavoie, for Parcel 281 in the Amount of $2,000.00 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. William H. Blanton, et al, Case No. 00- 1969 -CA, Golden Gate Boulevard, Project 63041. 15 October 23, 2001 Staff to deposit $800 into the Registry of the Courts 8) Authorize the making of an Offer of Judgment to Respondents, Samuel Trujillo and Sandra I. Gines, for Parcel 231 in the amount of $800.00 in the Lawsuit styled Collier County v. Richard A. Gower, et al, Case No. 00- 1396 -CA, Project No. 63041. Staff to deposit $400 into the Registry of the Courts 17. SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. A. To Adopt a Resolution approving amendments to the Fiscal Year 2000 -01 Adopted Budget. BAR 2001 -05 B. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition AVPLAT2001- AR1365 to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County's and the Public's interest in a portion of a 10' wide utility easement located on Lots 45 and 46, Block `B ", according to the Plat of "Colliers Reserve" as recorded in Plat Book 20, Pages 59 through 87, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, located in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Res. 2001411 C. To Adopt an Ordinance establishing standards for creation and review of County Boards; providing definitions; providing for creation of new boards; providing exemption; providing qualifications and requirements for membership; providing process of appointment; providing terms of office; providing attendance requirement; providing schedule for review of boards; and repealing Ordinance No. 86 -41 as amended. 16 October 23, 2001 Ord. 2001 -55 with changes D. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex carte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition CU- 2001 -AR- 1105 Lodestar Tower Inc., a Spectrasite Company representing Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requesting a conditional use for communications tower on a parcel of land zoned "CON /ACSC /ST" conservation for a property located on the south side of I -75, approximately 50 miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR -951) on Interstate I -75 in Section 1, Township 50 South and Range 34 East (Mile Marker 51.2), the site consists of 3.740 square feet. Res. 2001412 E. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex carte disclosure be provided by Commission members Petition CU- 2001 -AR- 1103 Lodestar Tower Inc., a Spectrasite Company representing Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requesting a conditional use for communications tower on a parcel of land zoned "CON /ACSC /ST" conservation for a property located on the south side of 1 -75, approximately 38 miles east of Collier Boulevard (CR -951) on Interstate I -75, in Section 1, Township 50 South and Range 32 East (Mile Marker 63.3), the site consists of 10.940 square feet. Res. 2001 -413 F. THIS ITEM IS BEING CONTINUED TO THE NOVEMBER 13 2001 BCC AGENDA. Petition PUDZ -0I -AR -620, Anita L. Jenkins of Wilson Miller Inc., representing Long Bay Partners, LLC, requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agricultural and PUD to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Meditenra having the effect of adding 213.7 acres to Mediterra PUD, reducing density and adding a Village Center District with a maximum of 20,000 square feet of floor area for property located on the East and West side of Livingston Road and approximately one mile West of I -75, in Sections 11 and 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. G. An Ordinance amending Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -8, the False Alarm Ordinance, eliminating false alarm report forms; requiring an annual registration form for each false alarm system; eliminating fine for second false alarm; authorizing notice to appear in court for sixth or subsequent false alarms; providing for false alarm prevention educational program classes and certificates of attendance; providing for inclusion in the Code of 17 October 23, 2001 Laws and Ordinances; providing for an effective date with a deferred enforcement date of November 1, 2001. Ord. 2001 -56 Continued to November 13, 2001 H. Approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, ratifying and further authorizing the more efficient administration of the County's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by providing for participation in the CDBG Program through Federal Fiscal Years 2001 -2005, and by providing for more clearly defined delegation of signature authority for CDBG Program Documents to specified County officials; providing for conflict and severability; and providing for an effective date. I. Approve and adopt the Consolidated Utility Standards and Procedures Ordinance, approve the Collier Utilities Technical Standards Manual as the official procedures and process manual and simplify the procedures to revise and maintain technical details and standards. Ord. 2001 -57 with changes J. An Ordinance repealing Collier County Ordinance No. 80 -45, the Retreat Unit One Street Lighting Municipal Service Taxing District (MSTU); providing for inclusion in Code of Laws and Ordinances; providing conflict and severability; providing an effective date. Ord. 2001 -58 18. ADJOURN INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 774 -8383. 18 October 23, 2001 ►2 AGENDA CHANGES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETING October 23, 2001 ADD: ITEM 5 TO BE HEARD AS FIRST PRESENTATION — Presentation by the Honorable Guy Carlton, Collier County Tax Collector, of FY '01 turn back funds. (Staff request.) CONTINUE: ITEM 5(A) TO NOVEMBER 27, 2001 MEETING: Recommendation to recognize Beverly Fields, Lieutenant, emergency medical services, as employee of the month for October, 2001. (Recipient request.) ADD: ITEM 5(B): Accept a $15,645 donation from Herbert J. and Margaret S. Sugden to the Collier County Parks and Recreation Department. (Staff request.) ADD: ITEM 5(C): Acceptance of $100,000 donation from Herbert J. and Margaret S. Sugden to the Collier County Public Library. (Staff request.) ITEM 8(D): CONTINUE TO NOVEMBER 13 2001 MEETING: PUD- 2000 -21, Robert L. Duane, A.I.C.P., of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Robert Vocisano and Angelo Favretto, requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Terafina PUD for a maximum of 850 residential dwelling units, golf course, and clubhouse, for property located approximately 1.5 miles east of 1 -75, one mile north of Immokalee Road (C.R. 846), in Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 646.5+ acres. (Petitioner request.) ITEM 10(G) TO BE HEARD AT 10:00 A.M. Authorize and approve purchase of last remaining out - parcel owned by Ricky Stauffer in Barefoot Beach Preserve. (Staff request.) ADD ITEM 100) Authorization for the BCC Chairman to sign and send letters to the Collier County legislative delegation requesting their opposition to proposals to increase the County portion of Medicaid nursing home and hospital costs. (Staff request.) CONTINUE: ITEM 16(A)4 TO NOVEMBER 13, 2001 MEETING: (This item was continued from the October 9, 2001 meeting.) Request to approve for recording the Final Plat of "Berkshire Commons Parcel 1, 2, 3 ". (Staff request.) MOVE: ITEM 16(A)14 TO ITEM 10(H): Third Amendment to the 2001 Tourism Agreement between Collier County and the Tourism Alliance of Collier County to include expenditures up to $500,000 for the Disaster Recovery Marketing Plan for Collier County from the Disaster Recovery Fund. (Staff request.) MOVE: ITEM 16(B)8 TO 16(C)17: City- County Emergency Wastewater Interconnect. (Staff request.) ADD: ITEM 16(B)9: Request approval for temporary "No Through Truck" signs at specified locations adjacent to the Naples Park neighborhood. (Commissioner Carter request.) ADD ITEM 16(B)10: Request to waive the right -of -way permit fees for the Tropicana Boulevard Beautification Project, as requested by the Golden Gate Beautification Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) Advisory Committee. (Staff request.) ADD: ITEM 16(F)4 (This item was continued from the September 11, 2001 meeting.) Approval of a resolution amending the Collier County Ambulance Service User Fees. (Staff request.) CONTINUE: ITEM 17H TO _NOVEMBER 13, 2001 MEETING An ordinance ratifying and further authorizing the more efficient administration of the County's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by providing for participation in the CDBG program through Federal Fiscal Years 2001 -2005, and by providing for more clearly defined delegation of signature authority for CDBG program documents to specified County officials; providing for conflict and severability; and providing for an effective date. (Staff request.) PROCLAMATION r 3 A t WHEREA5, prevention resources have been dramatically cut, programs and community based efforts are asked to do more with less and community services compete for remaining limited support, and, WHEREAS, substance abuse is the most common risk factor impacting our behavioral health, particularly for our young people, furthering delinquency, teen pregnancy, HIV /AIDS, child abuse and violence and so forth; and, WHEREAS, families face unprecedented pressures and stress imposed upon them by the overwhelming nature of today's society; and, WHEREAS, prevention and intervention efforts continue to influence non -use of alcohol, tobacco and other drag abuse, it still remains prevalent in every Florida community; and, WHEREAS, Floridians must recommit to strengthening families, neighborhoods, and communities and educating our citizens about prevention in every Florida community; and, WHEREAS, research and data reflect unquestionably that prevention works and that our commitment to education, prevention and positive lifestyles is imperative; and, WHEREAS, the Red Ribbd rrybwretelita tit I1Aertar ►� united effort to support dfidr'sa doge hmfties and to remember the and encourage a// Collier County c /t/zene to wear a rued r/bbon to symbolize our commitment to healthy and safe environments for each citizen, and to participate in events throughout the week and throughout the year that support positive lifesty /es. DONE AND ORDERED THIS 23nd Day of October 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COU A ES D. CARTER, Ph. D. , CHAIRMAN ATTEST: PROCLAMA TION WHEREAS, the 87 acres of land known as Little Palm Island is a beautiful remnant of wetland and upland wilderness in the midst of rapidly growing North Naples; and, WHEREAS, this land is potential habitat for many listed species of flora and fauna; and, WHEREAS, this site contains particularly fine habitat for the gopher tortoise, a Florida Species of Special Concern, as evidenced by the significant number of burrows and many tortoises living onsite; and, WHEREAS, there is a need for more passive recreational, natural parks in Collier County which ore easily accessible to the urban population, as articulated in several studies and polls, including the recent Community Character Study Report; and, WHEREAS, Little Palm most other above tJ! WHEREAS, WHEREAS, NOW Of Litt �. fOr, rl v" /- x _ COii>rtiills , TJ'�isti "A1° zrgen,y OJ Affairs, %tos rt .crnJ gr+�rhn de proje t such Mi , where land VIA, _ ct com�n '} 'aich as Co. t eroelaimed -that the Board o64 DONE AND ORDERED THIS alp DW 6HT E. BROOK, CLERK tent plans as are and most of the Orion for grant Otte Conservancy of c Palm Island. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COON IDA D. CARTER, A.D., CHAIRMAN COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: XXX Normal legal Advertisement (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept/ Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person: C.Aa+ wmv-1 � h Date: y ! 14,v Petition No. (If none, give brief description): PUD -92- 08(1), White Lake Industrial Park PUD Petitioner: (Name & Address): RWA, Inc., 3050 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 270, Naples, FL 34104 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) William T. Higgs, 2666 Airport Road Naples, Fla. 34112 Hearing before 2QQ�_ BCC _BZA Other Requested Hearing date: October 9, 2001, based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News ❑ Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: PUD -92- 08(1), RWA, Inc., representing William T. Higgs, requesting a rezone from PUD to P[JD known as White Lake Industrial Park PUD having the effect of changing the name to White Lake Corporate Park PUD, increasing the industrial land use from 67.4 acres to 77.3 acres, changing the zoning of 7.8 acres from industrial to commercial, reducing the area of the lakes from 44.1 acres to 36.6 acres and the area of the conservation/open space from 22.1 acres to 9.3 acres, and changing the property ownership or property located northeast of and adjacent to the intersection I -75 and Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), in 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petjjmi Fee include advertising cost? XX Yes 1 2- 649110 Re e ' ❑ No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 9 -12_ Division Head Date List Attachments: Approved by: q. County Manager Date A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ❑ County Manager agenda file: to ❑ Requesting Division ❑ Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONL Date Received: - - Date of Public hearing: _1 - 1 Date Advertised: C -- -0 SA�A-� '35 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 96355 BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS WHITE LAKE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATE PARK PUD, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED NORTHEAST OF AND ADJACENT TO THE INTERSECTION I -75 AND COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951), IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 144.4+ ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 93 -01, THE FORMER WHITE LAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, RWA, Inc., representing William T. Higgs, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 9635S, as described in Ordinance Number 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 93 -01, known as the White Lake Industrial Park PUD, adopted on January 5, 1993 by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. -1- 8 F loft PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency girl MaiUkOle M. Student Assistant County Attorney G: /admin/PUD- 92 -08(1) /CB /cw BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA -2- JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN WHITE LAKE CORPORATE PARK A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING WHITE LAKE CORPORATE PARK, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: WILLIAM T. HIGGS 2666 AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 PREPARED BY: RWA, INC. 3050 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE SUITE 270 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL Exhibit "A" Pile -Swat -7/97- 99/1999 Projeetal99.o019 White Lake Phase M /Piumed Unit Developmml Ammdmmt /whilelakeeogwatepukped6.dm 9/7/01 8 F. f TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits and Tables Statement of Compliance Section I Legal Description, Property OwnersNp and General Description Section II Project Development Section III Industrial Development Standards Section N Commercial Area Development Standards Section V Development Commitments 8F i ii I -1 II -1 III -1 IV -1 V -1 8F LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT A PUD MASTER PLAN TABLE I PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS 8 F STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 144.4 acres of property in Collier County as a Planned Unit Development to be known as White Lake Corporate Park is in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The facilities and improvements within the White Lake Corporate Park PUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives of each of the elements of the Growth Management Plan for the following reasons: 1. The subject property proposed for development is within the Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, and the Industrial District as identified on the Future Land Use Map' as provided for in Objective 1 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and the uses contemplated are consistent therewith. 2. The subject property is located in Activity Center #9. The land uses, and land use intensities proposed are consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3. Development of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall be consistent with the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. 4. The subject property is located in the northeast quadrant of the I -75 /Collier Boulevard Interchange. This strategic location allows the site superior access for the placement of commercial and industrial/business park activities. 5. The project is a mixed -use development located within a designated Activity Center, therefore, the proposed commercial, and industrial park land uses are consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 6. The development will be compatible with and complementary to existing and planned surrounding land uses. 7. The development of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.H and L of the Future Land Use Element. 8. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. 9. The White Lake Corporate Park PUD is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. 10. All final Development Orders within the White Lake Corporate Park PUD are subject to the Collier County Concurrency Management System, as implemented by the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. ii 1.1 1.2 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Description of the South %2 of Section 35 lying North and East of I -75 Right -of -Way and bounded on the East by monumented and occupied line. All that part of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida and being described as follows: Commencing at the West 1/4 Section corner of said Section 35; thence along the East and West 1/4 Section line of said Section 35, North 89 °- 00 -01" East 401.67 feet to the Easterly Right -of -Way line of I -75 and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence along the Right -of -Way line of said I -75 the following seven (7) courses: (1) South 43 °- 47' -54" East 222.17 feet; (2) South 46 °- 47' -05" East 308.10 feet; (3) Southeasterly 1047.59 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 2700.79 feet and being subtended by a chord which bears South 57 °- 53' -50" East 1041.03 feet; (4) South 69 °- 00 -33" East 516.30 feet; (5) South 73 °- 00' -33" East 2839.52 feet; (6) Southeasterly 411.28 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 1492.89 feet and being subtended by a chord which bears south 80 °- 54' -53" East 409.98 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (7) Easterly 22.49 feet along the are of a circular curve concave to the South, having a radius of 1562.89 feet and being subtended by a chord which bears South 88 °- 22' -53" East 22.49 feet to the East line of said Section 35; Thence leaving said I -75 Right -of -Way continue along said East line of Section 35, North 11- 57' -08" West 2089.96 feet to the East 1/4 section corner of said Section 35; Thence along the East and West %4 Section line of said Section 35, South 89 ° -00'- 00" West 4814.62 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described; subject to a Florida Power and Light Company easement as recorded in O.R. Book 681, pages 1214 -1215, Collier County, Florida; also subject to other easements and restrictions or record; containing 144.4 acres of land more or less. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently under the unified ownership of William T. Higgs, 2666 Airport Road South, Naples, Florida 34112. I -1 8F ''. 1.4 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION A. This project is located Northeast of and adjacent to the intersection of Interstate I -75 and County Road 951 in the South 1/2 of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. B. The zoning classification of the subject property is Planned Unit Development (PUD). C. The project site is within the South Florida Water Management District, Main Golden Gate Basin. D. Water management facilities for the proposed project are planned to be of the lake detention type. E. Elevations within the project site range from 8.2 to 12.9 feet above mean sea level. Most of the area, however, falls within the 9.5 to 12.0 feet of elevation category. F. The site is located in Flood Zone X according to FIRM Map, panel 425 of 1125, Collier County, Florida. G. The soil types on the subject property include Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum (approximately 13 %) and Boca fine sand (approximately 55 %). The remainder of the site (approximately 32 %) consists of a lake. Soil characteristics were derived from the Soil Survey of Collier County, Florida, issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Soil Conservation Service) in March, 1954. H. The property was historically utilized as an earth mining operation. Presently, the property is being developed in accordance with Section 3.2 and Section 4.2 of the former White Lake Corporate Park PUD. 1.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall be a mixed -use development, with a small commercial development opportunity located west of the FP &L easement on the White Lake Boulevard frontage, and the industrial development opportunity will remain over the balance of the PUD property. The commercial component of the development is limited to 96,165 square feet of gross leasable floor area, and will be located on a 7.85± acre parcel. The commercial land uses proposed are those typically associated with major interchanges, including, but not limited to, convenience stores with gas pumps, restaurants, fast -food and/or sit -down dining, and banks. The industrial/office park development is limited only by the land area available on the east side of the FP &L easement 1.6 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "White Lake Corporate Park Planned Unit Development Ordinance ". I -2 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE 8f The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the White Lake Corporate Park PUD development, as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, PUD- Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of building permit application. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the County Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and all graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall become part of the regulations that govern the manner in which the PUD site may be developed. D. Unless modified, waived or excepted by this PUD, the provisions of other sections of the Land Development Code, where applicable, remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the land that comprises this PUD. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the County Land Development Code, at the earliest or next to occur of either Final Site Development Plan, Final Plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE TRACTS A. The project Master Plan, including layout of streets and use of land for the various tracts is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan. There will be two land use tracts, portions of which may include water management lakes or facilities, and private street rights -of -way, the general configuration of which is also illustrated by Exhibit "A ". II -1 2.4 2.5 2.6 8 TABLE I PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TYPE ACREAGE± TRACT "I" INDUSTRIAL 136.5 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 7.8 B. Areas within the PUD may be excavated and constructed as lakes or, upon approval, may be constructed as shallow, intermittent wet and dry depressions for water retention purposes. Minor modification to all tracts, lakes or other boundaries may be permitted at the time of final plat or site development plan approval, subject to the provisions of Sections 3.2.6.3.5. and 2.7.3.5. respectively, of the Collier County Land Development Code, or as otherwise permitted by this PUD document. C. In addition to the various areas and specific items shown on Exhibit "A ", such easements as necessary (utility, private, semi - private) shall be established within or along the various tracts as may be necessary. DEVELOPMENTSCHEDULE The intent of the Developer is to proceed. with and complete the subdivision process for the final phase of development and to construct the infrastructure improvement as soon as all necessary permits are received. Individual lots will then be sold to prospective end -users for development. Build -out is estimated to occur in the year 2002. OPEN SPACE A minimum of thirty percent (30 %) of the project's gross area shall be devoted to open space in accordance with the Section 2.6.32.3. of the Collier County Land Development Code. This requirement shall not apply to individual development parcels. Of the project's total 144.4± acres, the following acreages represent 38% of the total site, all contributing to open space. Lake: 36.6± Ac. Wetland Conservation Area: 9.3± Ac. Native Landscaping: 6.9t Ac. FPL Easement: 3.0± Ac. PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. Prior to the recording of a record plat for all or part of the PUD, final plans of all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate Collier County governmental agency to insure compliance with the PUD Master Development Plan, the Collier County Subdivision Code,' and the platting laws of the State of Florida. II -2 10 1 8F B. Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. If required, a preliminary subdivision plat shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. Any division of property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida. C. The provisions of Division 3.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Division prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. D. The development of any tract or parcel approved for commercial or industrial development contemplating fee simple ownership of land for each commercial or industrial unit or parcel, shall be required to submit and receive approval of a preliminary subdivision plat, in conformance with the requirements of Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code, prior to the submittal of construction plans and a final plat for any portion of the tract or parcel. E. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructural improvements regarding any dedications and methods for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.7 LAKE SETBACK AND EXCAVATIONS Should lakes be excavated, the lake setback requirements described in Section 3.5.7.1 of the Land Development Code may be reduced with the administrative approval of the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator, or his designee. Lakes may be excavated to the maximum commercial excavation depths set forth in Section 3.5.7.3.1. of the Land Development Code, however, removal of fill from the White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall be limited to an amount up to ten percent (10 %) (to a maximum 20,000 cubic yards), of the total volume excavated unless a commercial excavation permit is received. 2.8 USE OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY All platted project streets shall be private and shall be classified as local streets, Utilization of lands within all project rights -of -way for landscaping, decorative entranceways, and signage may be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator, or his designee, for engineering and safety considerations prior to installation. 2.9 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance or PUD Master Development Plan, Exhibit "A ", as provided for in, Section 2.7.3.5. of the Collier County Land Development Code. Minor changes and refinements as described in Section 5.3.C. of this PUD document may be made in connection with any type of development or permit application required by the Collier County Land Development Code. II -3 8F _,2 2.10 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS & FACILITIES Easements shall be provided for water management areas, rights -of -way, utilities and other purposes as required. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at !the time of adoption of this Ordinance establishing the White Lake Corporate Park PUD. Whenever the developer elects to create land area whose ownership and maintenance responsibility is a common interest to all of the subsequent purchasers of property within the White Lake Corporate Park PUD, the developer shall provide appropriate legal instruments for the establishment of a Property Owners' Association whose function shall include provision for the perpetual care and maintenance of all common facilities and open space, subject further to the provisions of Section 2.2.20.3.8. of the Collier County Land Development Code. 2.11 FILL STORAGE Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 3.2.8.3.6. of the Collier County Land Development Code, fill storage is generally permitted as a principal use throughout the White Lake Corporate Park PUD. Fill material generated may be stockpiled within areas designated for development. Prior to stockpiling in these locations, a Vegetation Removal and Site Filling Permit, along with plans showing the locations and cross - sections shall be submitted to Collier County Planning Services Staff for review and approval. The following standards shall apply: A. Stockpile maximum side slope: 3:1 B. Stockpile maximum height: thirty -five (35) feet C Fill storage areas shall be screened with a security fence at least six (6) feet in height above ground level. If fill is spread to a height less than four feet over development areas that are depicted on an approved Site Development Plan, no fencing is required. D. Soil erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Division 3.7 of the Land Development Code. E. Fill storage shall not be permitted in Preserve Areas. 2.12 REQUIRED ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING Where the development of land within the White Lake Corporate Park PUD requires a permit from a local, State, or Federal agency with jurisdiction over the property proposed for development, the developer shall obtain such permits prior to final development order approval. 2.13 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS White Lake Corporate Park PUD will be consistent with Policy 6.4.6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, by adhering to the provisions of Section 3.9.5.5.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code. H -4 8F 2.14 LINKAGE TO COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Pursuant to Subsection 2.7.3.3. of the Land Development Code, upon adoption of the PUD Ordinance and attendant PUD Master Plan, the provisions of the PUD document become a part of the Land Development Code and shall be the standards of development for the PUD. Thenceforth, development in the area delineated as the White Lake Corporate Park PUD District on the Official Zoning Map will be governed by the adopted development regulations, PUD Master Plan, and all applicable provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code. 2.15 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS Commercial land uses shall comply with the provisions of Section 2.8.3. of the Land Development Code. Land uses proposed adjacent to the White Lake Boulevard Right -of- Way, visible from the I -75 travel lanes, shall comply with the applicable architectural design guidelines set forth in Division 2.8 of the Land Development Code, and may request alternative architectural design standards as provided in, and in accordance with, the provisions of Section 2.8.2.5 of the Land Development Code. Alternative standards shall be evaluated for their consistency with the purpose and intent of the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. The purpose of the architectural guidelines and standards is to provide a pleasing visual experience from the I -75 corridor in an effort to create a gateway into Naples and Collier County, thereby advancing the purpose of the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. At such time as Collier County adopts design standards for the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan, those standards shall apply to this PUD. II -5 8F SECTION III INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as Tract "I ", Industrial Development Area on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan. 3.2 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Usesl: 1) Agricultural related services (Industry Numbers 0711 -0724, 0761, 0782, and 0783); 2) Apparel and other finished products as defined under Major Group 23; 3) Automotive repair, services, and parking as defined in Major Group 75; 4) Building construction as defined under Major Group 15; 5) Business services (Industry Numbers 7312, 7313, 7319, 7334 -7336, and 7342 -7389 ); 6) Communications as defined under Major Group 48; 7) Construction — special trade contractors as defined under Major Group 17; 8) Eating and drinking places (Industry Number 5812); 9) Educational services (Industry Numbers 8243 - 8249); 10) Electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment as defined under Major Group 36; 11) Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (Industry Numbers 8711- 8733); 12) Fabricated metal products, except machinery and transportation equipment (Industry Numbers 3411 -3479, and 3499); 13) Food and kindred products (Industry Numbers 2011- 2099). Slaughtering Plants of any kind are prohibited; 14) Furniture and fixtures as defined under Major Group 25; 15) Heavy construction other than building construction - contractors as defined under Major Group 16; 11 1 Reference Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987 Edition. 8 F da '0 16) Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment as defined under Major Group 35; 17) Leather and leather products (Industry Numbers 3131- 3199); 18) Local, and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation as defined under Major Group 41; 19) Lumber and wood products (Industry Numbers 2426, 2431 - 2499); 20) Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks as defined under Major Group 38; 21) Membership organizations (Industry Numbers 8611 and 8631); 22) Miscellaneous manufacturing industries as defined under Major Group 39; 23) Miscellaneous repair services (Industry Number 7692); 24) Motor freight transportation and warehousing (Industry Numbers 4212 - 4226); 25) Paper and allied products (Industry Numbers 2652- 2679); 26) Personal services (Industry Number 72 19); 27) Printing, publishing, and allied industries as defined under Major Group 27; 28) Rubber and miscellaneous plastics (Industry Numbers 3021 - 3089); 29) Stone, glass, and concrete products (Industry Numbers 3211, 3251 -3273, and 3281); 30) Textile mill products (Industry Numbers 2211, 2221, 2241, 2251 -2259, and 2273 - 2299); 31) Transportation equipment (Industry Numbers 3714, 3716, 3728, 3732, 3751, 3769, 3792, and 3799); 32) Transportation services (Industry Numbers 4731, and 4783 ); 33) United States Postal Service as defined under Major Group 43; 34) Wholesale trade - durable goods (Industry Numbers 5012 -5014, 5021 -5049, 5063 -5088, 5091, 5092 and 5094); 35) Wholesale trade - nondurable goods (Industry Numbers 5111 -5159, 5181, 5182, and 5199); 36) Any other use which is comparable in nature to the foregoing land uses as determined by the Collier County Planning Services Director. II 8 F B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Parking facilities; 2) Customary accessory and incidental uses and structures associated with permitted principal uses of this PUD; 3) Retail sales and/or display areas as' accessory to the principal use, not to exceed an area greater than twenty percent (20 %) of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. 3.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Front yard setbacks shall be measured from back .of curb or edge of pavement, whichever is closer to the structure. B. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 20,000 square feet. C. AVERAGE LOT WIDTH: 100 feet. 1) Front Yard: 50 feet; 2) Side Yard: 20 feet; 3) Rear Yard: 15 feet; 4) Waterfront: 25 feet; 4) Yards abutting off -site residential land uses: 50 feet; 5) Parcels with two frontages may reduce one front yard by 10 feet. E. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES: Placement of structures shall be in compliance with NFPA standards for fire safety, with no less than 10 feet of separation. F. MAXFVILTM HEIGHT: 50 feet. G. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA: 1,000 square feet. H. OFF - STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: As required by Division 2.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of site development plan approval. We 7� I. OUTSIDE STORAGE: Outside storage of manufactured products, raw or finished materials, or vehicles other than passenger vehicles is permitted in this PUD subject to the provision of screening with a fence at least 7 feet in height above ground level from all adjacent or abutting residentially zoned or developed land. Said fence or wall shall be opaque in design, and made of masonry, wood, or other materials approved by the Collier County Planning Services Director. 11 SECTION IV COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 4.1 PURPOSE 8F The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as Tract "C ", Commercial Development Area on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan. 4.2 MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL SQUARE FEET The 7.85+ acre Commercial Development Area (Tract "C "), shall not be developed with more than 96,165 square feet of commercial uses. Should a hotel or motel be proposed, a commensurate amount of commercial development opportunity shall be lost, based on a comparison of average annual daily trip generations. 4.3 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole. or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses': 1) Apparel and accessory stores as defined under Major Group 56; 2) Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations (Industry Numbers 5531, and 5541); 3) Building materials, hardware, and garden supply (Industry Numbers 5211- 5261); 4) Business services (Industry Numbers 7311, 7334, and 7371); 5) Carwashes (Industry Number 7542); 6) Eating and drinking places as defined under Major Group 58; 7) Engineering, accounting, research, and management (Numbers 8711 with no outside equipment storage, 8712 with no .outside equipment storage, 8721, 8732, 8742, 8743, and 8748); 8) Finance, insurance, and real estate as defined under Major Groups 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, and 67; 9) Food stores as defined under Major Group 54; 10) General merchandise stores as defined under Major Group 53; 11) Government offices as defined under Major Group 91; N -1 1 Reference Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987 Edition. 8F .. 12) Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores as defined under Major Group 57; 13) Hotels or motels (Industry Number '7011). No more than 150 rooms shall be permitted; 14) Legal services as defined under Major Group 81; 15) Miscellaneous retail as defined under Major Group 59, not including Industry Numbers 5932, 5961, 5983 7 5989, and not including the retail sale of fireworks; 16) Motion pictures as defined under Major Group 78; 17) Personal services (Industry Numbers 7211, 7215, 7216 except rug cleaning, 7221 -7291, and 7299, only including car title and tag service, computer photography or portraits, costume rental, dress suit and tuxedo rental, electrolysis (hair removal), hair weaving or replacement service, and tanning salons). B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Parking facilities; 2) One caretaker's residence. 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Front yard setbacks shall be measured from back of curb or edge of pavement, whichever is closer to the structure. B. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 10,000 square feet. C. AVERAGE LOT WIDTH: 100 feet. D. MINIMUM YARDS (INTERNAL): 1) Front Yard: 25 feet, or one -half of the building height as measured from each exterior wall, whichever is greater; 2) Side Yard: 10 feet; 3) Rear Yard: One -half of the building height; 4) Parcels with two frontages may reduce one front yard by 10 feet. E. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES: Placement of structures shall be in compliance with NFPA standards for fire safety, with no less than 10 feet of separation. F. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 50 feet. IV -2 2, .,, F wll "I", G. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA: 1,000 square feet per principal structure, on the first finished floor. H. MAXIMUM GROSS LEASABLE FLOOR AREA: 96,165 square feet. I. OFF - STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: As required by Division 2.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of site development plan approval. J. OUTSIDE STORAGE AND DISPLAY: Outside storage and display is prohibited in Tract C as depicted on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan, with the exception of garden centers. K. CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE: One (1) caretaker's residence shall be permitted for the commercial development area, subject to the following: 1) The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the shopping center or one of the commercial buildings, and shall be entered from within that structure. Exits that comply with fire codes shall be permitted. 2) The caretakers' residence shall be an accessory use, and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the shopping center or commercial facilities. 3) Off - street parking shall be as for a single - family residence in accordance with Division 2.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of site development plan approval. Parking for the caretaker's residences shall be in addition to any other required parking facilities. IV -3 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE 1� 8r- The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of the project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with final site development plans, final subdivision plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this PUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the Land Development Code, Division 3.2 shall apply to this project even if the land within the PUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the Master Development Plan and the regulations of the PUD as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor or assignee in title to the developer is bound by any commitments within this agreement. These commitments may be assigned or delegated to a master association to be created by the developer. Upon assignment or delegation, the developer shall be released from responsibility for the commitments. 5.3 PUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan' illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries, or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final, and may be varied at anytime at any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or site development plan application. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5 of the Land Development Code, amendments may be made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and all common areas in the project. C. The Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator, or his designee, shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the White Lake Corporate Park PUD Master Plan upon written request of the developer. 1) The following limitations shall apply to such requests: a. The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the White Lake Corporate Park PUD document. b. The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a substantial change pursuant to Subsection 2.7.3.5.1. of the Collier County Land Development Code. V -1 • c. The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with adjacent land uses, and shall not create detrimental impacts to abutting land uses, water management facilities, and preserve areas within, or external to the PUD boundaries. 2) The following shall be considered minor changes or refinements, subject to the limitations of Subsection 5.3.C.1) of this document: a. Reconfiguration of preserve areas, jurisdictional wetland limits, and mitigation features as a result of regulatory agency review and permitting. There may be no overall decrease in preserve area. b. Reconfiguration of lakes, or other water management facilities where such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District and Collier County. c. Internal realignment of vehicular circulation patterns. 3) Minor changes and refinements, as described above, shall be reviewed by appropriate County staff to ensure compliance with all applicable County ordinances and regulations prior to the Administrator's consideration for approval. 4) Approval by the Administrator of a minor change or refinement may occur independently from and prior to any application for subdivision or site development plan approval, however, the Administrator's, or his designee's approval shall not constitute an authorization for development or implementation of the minor change or refinement without first obtaining all applicable County permits and approvals. 5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT /MONITO,RING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION A. This PUD is subject to the Sunset Provisions of Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code. B. An annual PUD monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section 2.7.3.6 of the Land Development Code. 5.5 TRANSPORTATION The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. The developer shall maintain joint/shared access with the adjacent property (Citygate PUD), via White Lake Boulevard. B. The petitioner shall provide left turn lanes and arterial level street lighting at all project entrances, if deemed warranted by Collier County. The turn lanes and arterial level street lighting shall be provided when requested by the County. C. The petitioner shall be responsible for a fair share contribution of the site related roadway improvements at the Collier Boulevard/White Lake Boulevard intersection, which has been determined to be $118,850.00, and shall be paid to Collier County on or before October 1, 2001. V -2 8F - .11 5.6 ENGINEERING The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Detailed paving, grading site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction with the submitted plans is granted by Engineering Review Services. B. The internal right -of -way cross - section shall be in accordance with the typical section depicted on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan. C. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code. D. Work within Collier County right -of -way shall meet the requirements of Collier County Right -Of -Way Ordinance 82 -91. E. The project shall be platted in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code to define the right -of -way, tracts, and easements as shown on the Master Plan. 5.7 WATER MANAGEMENT The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. A copy of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Surface Water Permit Application shall be sent to Collier County Development Services with the Subdivision Plat and Construction Plan and/or SDP submittal. A copy of the approval of this SF)N'MD Surface Water Permit shall be submitted prior to Site Development Plan approval. B. All requirements of Excavation Permit No. 59.133 shall be complied with. If an annual report is not filed, the excavation permit will be considered void in accordance with the Land Development Code and a complete resubmission will be necessary. 5.8 UTILITIES The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. V -3 8F '01 B. The on -site water distribution system to serve the project must be connected to the District's water main consistent with the main sizing requirements specified in the County's Water Master Plan and extended throughout the project. During design of these facilities, the following features shall be incorporated into the distribution system: 1. Dead -end mains shall be eliminated by looping the internal pipeline network; 2. Stubs for future system interconnection with adjacent properties shall be provided to the east property line of th,,- project, at locations to be mutually agreed to by the County and the Developer, during the design phase of the project; 2. The utility construction documents for the project's sewerage system shall be prepared so that all sewage flowing into the County's sewerage system is transmitted by one (1) main on -site pump station. The developer's engineer shall meet with the County staff prior to commencing preparation of construction drawings, so that all aspects of the sewerage system design can be coordinated with the County's Sewer Master Plan; 3. The existing off -site water facilities of the District must be evaluated for hydraulic capacity to serve this project and reinforced as required, if necessary, consistent with the County's Water Master Plan to insure that the District's water system can hydraulically provide a sufficient quantity of water to meet the anticipated demands for the project, and the District's existing committed capacity. 5.9 ENVIRONMENTAL The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A Wetland preserve /conservation areas shall be surveyed prior to construction plan/plat approval. A conservation easement similar to or as per Chapter 704.06 Florida Statutes shall be created and indicated on the plat, and shall be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County. B. All State and Federal permits that may affect the design of this project shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services prior to final subdivision plat approval. C. The use of native species in landscape plans shall be in accordance with Section 2.4.4.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code. D. Prohibited exotic vegetation removal shall be performed in accordance with Section 3.9.6.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. E. Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1. of the Land Development Code, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other. construction activity a historic artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. F. The mitigation plan for the preserve and buffer areas is provided in the Environmental Impact Statement. V -4 \f G. The PUD Master Plan provides 4.9 acres of conservation area on -site. An additional 6.9 acres of native landscaping will be planted on site, and 0.3 acres of littoral vegetation will be restored along the entire lake bank where it abuts the conservation area. Mitigation planting within conservation areas, buffers and lake littoral zones shall be completed prior to preliminary acceptance of the next phase of the development. 5.10 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Accessory structures shall be constructed simultaneously with, or following the construction of the principal structure, except for a construction site office that may be constructed prior to commencement of infrastructure construction. 5.11 SIGNS All signs shall be in accordance with Division 2.5 of Collier County's Land Development Code, and the ,Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. 5.12 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout the White Lake Corporate Park PUD, except in preserve areas. The following standards shall apply: A. Landscape berms shall have the following maximum side slopes: 1) Grassed berms 3:1 2) Ground covered berms 3:1 3) Rip -Rap berms 1:1 4) Structural walled berms may be vertical. B. Fencing materials shall be of eitherwood, masonry or similar material. D. Fence or wall maximum height: 9 feet, as measured from the finished grade of the ground at the base of the fence or wall. For the purpose of this provision, finished grade shall be considered no greater than 18 inches above the crown elevation of the nearest existing road, unless the fence or wall is constructed on a perimeter landscape berm. In these cases, the fence or wall shall not exceed 6 feet in height from the top of berm elevation with an average side slope of greater than 4:1 (i.e. 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, or vertical). D. Pedestrian sidewalks, bike paths, water management facilities and structures may be allowed in landscape buffer areas in accordance with Division 2.4 of the Land Development Code. 5.13 LANDSCAPING FOR OFF - STREET PARKING AREAS Except where provided for elsewhere in this document, all landscaping for off - street parking areas shall be in accordance with Division 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code, and the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. V -5 Y. r ! H pN COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) � I m Z I EIS RAW � � °� — � FP &L EASEME14T — — — — — — — — Gt log I ; ' Z1,11510 I DI T&I I � 1 s 9 z / y Wm mke�m0 Q o rC r m I A y(-) D(nD OD—' C O r 5> r m =-I � f (n 0 8 1 v m O I M m z D o o (n 6 -P W W—V r/ .iA V V 01 (A ED O) Q V l D D D D D D D D D / i r r � ' n n ......... r 144 � � f• 9 EXHIBIT "A " .4'D llgl IIC6 QCflll p�pRnl aga000 n +% MUM 1; HIGGS WNl1� LAKeC COfi'Op 31� 1'Ai?K � 99-OW r ".1(� CIVIL ENGINEERS Development & °Oa9XO ,�D1 L pUn p PLAN %- • 1/ .L .>•. Envkonmental Consultants f 1 GJr[. >m.w.iw..... ee... e...enww.rrrwiw prgw�A rw:Mp«wm. A ,g dft } Y. r ! H pN COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) � I m Z I EIS RAW � � °� — � FP &L EASEME14T — — — — — — — — Gt log I ; ' Z1,11510 I DI T&I I � 1 s 9 z / y Wm mke�m0 Q o rC r m I A y(-) D(nD OD—' C O r 5> r m =-I � f (n 0 8 1 v m O I M m z D o o (n 6 -P W W—V r/ .iA V V 01 (A ED O) Q V l D D D D D D D D D / i r r � ' n n ......... r 144 � � f• 9 EXHIBIT "A " .4'D llgl IIC6 QCflll p�pRnl aga000 n +% MUM 1; HIGGS WNl1� LAKeC COfi'Op 31� 1'Ai?K � 99-OW r ".1(� CIVIL ENGINEERS Development & °Oa9XO ,�D1 L pUn p PLAN %- • 1/ .L .>•. Envkonmental Consultants f 1 GJr[. >m.w.iw..... ee... e...enww.rrrwiw prgw�A rw:Mp«wm. A ,g dft 8F September 17, 2001 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: PUD -92- 08(1), White Lake Industrial Park PUD Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, September 23, 2001, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk P.O. /Account # 113 - 138312- 649110 8 F NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, October 9, 2001, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 96355 BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS WHITE LAKE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATE PARK PUD, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED NORTHEAST OF AND ADJACENT TO THE INTERSECTION I -75 AND COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951), IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 144.4+ ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 93 -01, THE FORMER WHITE LAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. (PUD -92- 08(1), RWA, Inc., representing William T. Higgs, requesting a rezone from PUD to PUD known as White Lake Industrial Park PUD having the effect of changing the name to White Lake Corporate Park PUD, increasing the industrial land use from 67.4 acres to 77.3 acres, changing the zoning of 7.8 acres from industrial to commercial, reducing the area of the lakes from 44.1 acres to 36.6 acres and the area of the conservation /open space from 22.1 acres to 9.3 acres, and changing the property ownership) Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. 8F Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Teri Michaels To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: PUD -92- 08(1), White Lake Industrial Park PUD Thanks! PUD- 92- 08(1).dot PUD 92- 08(1).doc Teri Michaels sr- From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 4:12 PM To: Teri Michaels Subject: Delivered: PUD -92- 08(1), White Lake Industrial Park PUD I PUD -92- 08(1), White Lake Indus... « PUD -92- 08(1), White Lake Industrial Park PUD>> Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com, Subject: PUD -92- 08(1), White Lake Industrial Park PUD Sent: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:15:04 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:12:14 -0400 1 o�,�HE Cf @cGlr U "7 Dwight E. Brock Clerk September 17, 2001 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101044 RWA, Inc. 3050 North Horseshoe Drive Suite 270 Naples, Florida 34104 A A CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition PUD -92- 08(1), White Lake Industrial Park PUD Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 9, 2001, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, September 23, 2001. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk Enclosure o�.�tlE CIQCGl� 4 G � a U ^i q coe Dwight E. Brock Clerk September 17, 2001 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES. FLORIDA 34101 ,3044 William T. Higgs 2666 Airport Road Naples, Florida 341112 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition PUD -92- 08(1), White Lake Industrial Park PUD Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 9, 2001, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, September 23, 2001. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Ellie J. Hoffman To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: Petitions PUD92 -08(1) & RZ2001 -AR -451 Hi Pam, Attached please find the two "corrected" notices for the above - referenced petitions. Thanks so much for bringing these to our attention. Welcome back!! 9_1 9� PUD- 92- 08(1).dot RZ- 2001- AR -451.D OC.dot Ellie 8F Ellie J. Hoffman From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 12:25 PM To: Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: Delivered: Petitions PUD92- 08(1) & RZ2001 -AR -451 I Petitions D92 -08(1) & RZ200 <<Petitions PUD92 -08(1) & RZ2001 -AR -451» Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com' Subject: Petitions PUD92 -08(1) & RZ2001 -AR -451 Sent: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:28:00 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:25:02 -0400 1 Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHRIS HORTON PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101 -3016 REFERENCE: 001230 1131383126491 58321270 PUD -92 -080) NOTICE State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/23 AD SPACE: 159.000 INCH FILED ON: 09/24/01 - - - - -- - - -- Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscribed 4eALrre me this .: � X of 20 Personally known by me hDonna Chesney My Commission DDOW336 or NOT ExPires September 11, 2005 9 4 r-r-cl ' CIE Commissioner$ will con- sider the enachyw* of a meuet�ing willl will tthhe9 proposed Ordinance is as foflows: AMENDIINGN ORDE ueurF NUMBER 8 F *4 10 7.8 acres from Iodustri- at to commercial re- ducing the area .off the lakes from 44.1 acres to 36A acres and the area of the conserva- tion /open space from 22.1 acres to 9.3 acres, and changing the prop - erty ownership) Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspec- tion. All Interested parties are Invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda Item must regis- ter with the County ad- ministrator pry to n� sentafon of aaggee item io be addressett. In- dividual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any Item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair- man, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 min- utes to speak on an Item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit sold material a minimum of 3 weeks FORMER WHITE; LAKE INDUSTRIAL, PARK RVIDING AND EF- FECTIVE DATE. IPUD -92 -080) RWA, Inc., represeAno Wil- liam T. Higgs request- ing a rezone from PUD to PUD known as White Lake Industrial Park PUD having the effect two White La ee Co Po- rate Park PUD, in. creasing the Industrial ne res use 7from acres, shall come a perrnmw,n w the record. who decl Any person es to apPeal a decision the Board will need a r cord of the proceedin Minina thereto ai ensure mar u c 9, record of the pr o is made, which record cludes the testimony c evidence upon which appeal Is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES D. CARTER, PhD CHAIRMAN D016HT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s/TerI lchoeh, - �- No. 169 f 8F ORDINANCE NO. 01- 59 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 9635S BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "PUD" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS WHITE LAKE INDUSTRIAL CORPORATE PARK PUD, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED NORTHEAST OF AND ADJACENT TO THE INTERSECTION I -75 AND COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951), IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 144.4+ ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 93 -01, THE FORMER WHITE LAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, RWA, Inc., representing William T. Higgs, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 9635S, as described in Ordinance Number 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 93 -01, known as the White Lake Industrial Park PUD, adopted on January 5, 1993 by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. -1- 'E7 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 4-0 ay of , 2001. T- Clerk Clerk hairxan's Ci9WA a #�'0l�,r• iv Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Marj ie M. Student Assistant County Attorney G: /admin /PU D -92- 08(1) /CB /cw BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA C BY: JAMtS D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN -2- WHITE LAKE CORPORATE PARK 01 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING WHITE LAKE CORPORATE PARK, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: WILLIAM T. HIGGS 2666 AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 IVIR RWA, INC. 3050 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE SUITE 270 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC 9/7/01 DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER zoo /_Sp AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL Exhibit "A" File - Sever -2197- 9911999 Proj.11199 -0019 While Lake Phase IIVPlonnod Unit DeMopmmt MrcndmcnV :raitclakecorpmateparkpud6.da 8F TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits and Tables i Statement of Compliance ii Section I Legal Description, Property Ownership and General Description I -1 Section H Project Development H -1 Section III Industrial Development Standards III -1 Section IV Commercial Area Development Standards IV -1 Section V Development Commitments V -1 LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT A PUD MASTER PLAN TABLE I PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS 8F STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 144.4 acres of property in Collier County as a Planned Unit Development to be known as White Lake Corporate Park is in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The facilities and improvements within the White Lake Corporate Park PUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives of each of the elements of the Growth Management Plan for the following reasons: 1. The subject property proposed for development is within the Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, and the Industrial District as identified on the Future Land Use Map' as provided for in Objective 1 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and the uses contemplated are consistent therewith. 2. The subject property is located in Activity Center #9. The land uses, and land use intensities proposed are consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3. Development of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall be consistent with the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. 4. The subject property is located in the northeast quadrant of the I -75 /Collier Boulevard Interchange. This strategic location allows the site superior access for the placement of commercial and industrial/business park activities. 5. The project is a mixed -use development located within a designated Activity Center, therefore, the proposed commercial, and industrial park land uses are consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 6. The development will be compatible with and complementary to existing and planned surrounding land uses. 7. The development of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.H and L of the Future Land Use Element. 8. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. 9. The White Lake Corporate Park PUD is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. 10. All final Development Orders within the White Lake Corporate Park PUD are subject to the Collier County Concurrency Management System, as implemented by the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. ii 1.1 1.2 1.3 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION PURPOSE 8F 4 The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Description of the South % of Section 35 lying North and East of I -75 Right -of -Way and bounded on the East by monumented and occupied line. All that part of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida and being described as follows: Commencing at the West %4 Section corner of said Section 35; thence along the East and West 1/4 Section line of said Section 35, North 89 °- 00 -01" East 401.67 feet to the Easterly Right -of -Way line of I -75 and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence along the Right -of -Way line of said I -75 the following seven (7) courses: (1) South 43 °- 47' -54" East 222.17 feet; (2) South 46 °- 47' -05" East 308.10 feet; 3) Southeasterly 1047.59 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 2700.79 feet and being subtended by a chord which bears South 57 °- 53' -50" East 1041.03 feet; (4) South 69 °- 00 -33" East 516.30 feet; (5) South 73 °- 00' -33" East 2839.52 feet; (6) Southeasterly 411.28 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 1492.89 feet and being subtended by a chord which bears south 80 °- 54' -53" East 409.98 feet to a point of reverse curvature; (7) Easterly 22.49 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the South, having a radius of 1562.89 feet and being subtended by a chord which bears South 88 °- :Z2' -53" East 22.49 feet to the East line of said Section 35; Thence leaving said I -75 Right -of -Way continue along said East line of Section 35, North 1 °- 57' -08" West 2089.96 feet to the East 1/4 section corner of said Section 35; Thence along the East and West 1/4 Section line of said Section 35, South 89 ° -00'- 00" West 4814.62 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described; subject to a Florida Power and Light Company easement as recorded in O.R. Book 681, pages 1214 -1215, Collier County, Florida; also subject to other easements and restrictions or record; containing 144.4 acres of land more or less. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently under the unified ownership of William T. Higgs, 2666 Airport Road South, Naples, Florida 34112. I -1 8F 1.4 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION A. This project is located Northeast of and adjacent to the intersection of Interstate I -75 and County Road 951 in the South %2 of Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. B. The zoning classification of the subject property is Planned Unit Development (PUD). C. The project site is within the South Florida Water Management District, Main Golden Gate Basin. D. Water management facilities for the proposed project are planned to be of the lake detention type. E. Elevations within the project site range from 8.2 to 12.9 feet above mean sea level. Most of the area, however, falls within the 9.5 to 12.0 feet of elevation category. F. The site is located in Flood Zone X according to FIRM Map, panel 425 of 1125, Collier County, Florida. G. The soil types on the subject property include Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum (approximately 13 %) and Boca fine sand (approximately 55 %). The remainder of the site (approximately 32 %) consists of a lake. Soil characteristics were derived from the Soil Survey of Collier County, Florida, issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (Soil Conservation Service) in March, 1954. H. The property was historically utilized as an earth mining operation. Presently, the property is being developed in accordance with Section 3.2 and Section 4.2 of the former White Lake Corporate Park PUD. 1.5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall be a mixed -use development, with a small commercial development opportunity located west of the FP &L easement on the White Lake Boulevard frontage, and the industrial development opportunity will remain over the balance of the PUD property. The commercial component of the development is limited to 96,165 square feet of gross leasable floor area, and will be located on a 7.85± acre parcel. The commercial land uses proposed are those typically associated with major interchanges, including, but not limited to, convenience stores with gas pumps, restaurants, fast -food and /or sit -down dining, and banks. The industrial /office park development is limited only by the land area available on the east side of the FP &L easement 1.6 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "White Lake Corporate Park Planned Unit Development Ordinance ". I -2 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE 8F The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the White Lake Corporate Park PUD development, as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, PUD- Planned Unit Development District and other. applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of building permit application. Where these regulalions fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the County Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and all graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall become part of the regulations that govern the manner in which the PUD site may be developed. D. Unless modified, waived or excepted by this PUD, the provisions of other sections of the Land Development Code, where applicable, remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the land that comprises this PUD. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the County Land Development Code, at the earliest or next to occur of either Final Site Development Plan, Final Plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE TRACTS A. The project Master Plan, including layout of streets and use of land for the various tracts is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan. There will be two land use tracts, portions of which may include water management lakes or facilities, and private street rights -of -way, the general configuration of which is also illustrated by Exhibit "A ". H -1 2.4 2.5 2.6 8F TABLE I PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TYPE ACREAGE± TRACT "I" INDUSTRIAL 136.5 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 7.8 B. Areas within the PUD may be excavated and constructed as lakes or, upon approval, may be constructed as shallow, intermittent wet and dry depressions for water retention purposes. Minor modification to all tracts, lakes or other boundaries may be permitted at the time of final plat or site development plan approval, subject to the provisions of Sections 3.2.6.3.5. and 2.7.3.5. respectively, of the Collier County Land Development Code, or as otherwise permitted by this PUD document. C. In addition to the various areas and specific items shown on Exhibit "A ", such easements as necessary (utility, private, semi- private) shall be established within or along the various tracts as may be necessary. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE The intent of the Developer is to proceed with and complete the subdivision process for the final phase of development and to construct the infrastructure improvement as soon as all necessary permits are received. Individual lots will then be sold to prospective end -users for development. Build -out is estimated to occur in the year 2002. OPEN SPACE A minimum of thirty percent (30 %) of the project's gross area shall be devoted to open space in accordance with the Section 2.6.32.3. of the Collier County Land Development Code. This requirement shall not apply to individual development parcels. Of the project's total 144.4± acres, the following acreages represent 38% of the total site, all contributing to open space. Lake: 36.6± Ac. - Wetland Conservation Area: 9.3± Ac. Native Landscaping: 6.9± Ac. FPL Easement: 3.0± Ac. PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. Prior to the recording of a record plat for all or part of the PUD, final plans of all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate Collier County governmental agency to insure compliance with the PUD Master Development Plan, the Collier County Subdivision Code,' and the platting laws of the State of Florida. 11W 8F B. Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. If required, a preliminary subdivision plat shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan. Any division of property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida. C. The provisions of Division 3.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Division prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. D. The development of any tract or parcel approved for commercial or industrial development contemplating fee simple ownership of land for each commercial or industrial unit or parcel, shall be required to submit and receive approval of a preliminary subdivision plat, in conformance with the requirements of Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code, prior to the submittal of construction plans and a final plat for any portion of the tract or parcel. E. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructural improvements regarding any dedications and methods for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.7 LAKE SETBACK AND EXCAVATIONS Should lakes be excavated, the lake setback requirements described in Section 3.5.7.1 of the Land Development Code may be reduced with the administrative approval of the Collier County Community Development and Enviromnental Services Administrator, or his designee. Lakes may be excavated to the maximum commercial excavation depths set forth in Section 3.5.7.3.1. of the Land Development Code, however, removal of fill from the White Lake Corporate Park PUD shall be limited to an amount up to ten percent (10 %) (to a maximum 20,000 cubic yards), of the total volume excavated unless a commercial excavation permit is received. 2.8 USE OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY All platted project streets shall be private and shall be classified as local streets; Utilization of lands within all project rights -of -way for land,,caping, decorative entranceways, and signage may be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator, or his designee, for engineering and safety considerations prior to installation. 2.9 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance or PUD Master Development Plan, Exhibit "A ", as provided for in Section 2.7.3.5. of the Collier County Land Development Code. Minor changes and refinements as described in Section 5.3.C. of this PUD document may be made in connection with any type of development or permit application required by the Collier County Land Development Code. II -3 8F 13 2.10 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS & FACILITIES Easements shall be provided for water management areas, rights -of -way, utilities and other purposes as required. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at !the time of adoption of this Ordinance establishing the White Lake Corporate Park PUD. Whenever the developer elects to create land area whose ownership and maintenance responsibility is a common interest to all of the subsequent purchasers of property within the White Lake Corporate Park PUD, the developer shall provide appropriate legal instruments for the establishment of a Property Owners' Association whose function shall include provision for the perpetual care and maintenance of all common facilities and open space, subject further to the provisions of Section 2.2.20.3.8. of the Collier County Land Development Code. 2.11 FILL STORAGE Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 3.2.8.3.6. of the Collier County Land Development Code, fill storage is generally permitted as a principal use throughout the White Lake Corporate Park PUD. Fill material generated may be stockpiled within areas designated for development. Prior to stockpiling in these locations, a Vegetation Removal and Site Filling Permit, along with plans showing the locations and cross - sections shall be submitted to Collier County Planning Services Staff for review and approval. The following standards shall apply: A. Stockpile maximum side slope: 3:1 B. Stockpile maximum height: thirty -five (35) feet C Fill storage areas shall be screened with a security fence at least six (6) feet in height above ground level. If fill is spread to a height less than four feet over development areas that are depicted on an approved Site Development Plan, no fencing is required. D. Soil erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Division 3.7 of the Land Development Code. E. Fill storage shall not be permitted in Preserve Areas. 2.12 REQUIRED ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING Where the development of land within the White Lake Corporate Park PUD requires a permit from a local, State, or Federal agency with jurisdiction over the property proposed for development, the developer shall obtain such permits prior to final development order approval. 2.13 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS White Lake Corporate Park PUD will be consistent with Policy 6.4.6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan, by adhering to the provisions of Section 3.9.5.5.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code. H -4 8 F ."q - i 2.14 LINKAGE TO COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Pursuant to Subsection 2.7.3.3. of the Land Development Code, upon adoption of the PUD Ordinance and attendant PUD Master Plan, the provisions of the PUD document become a part of the Land Development Code and shall be the standards of development for the PUD. Thenceforth, development in the area delineated as the White Lake Corporate Park PUD District on the Official Zoning Map will be governed by the adopted development regulations, PUD Master Plan, and all applicable provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code. 2.15 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS Commercial land uses shall comply with the provisions of Section 2.8.3. of the Land Development Code. Land uses proposed adjacent to the White Lake Boulevard Right -of- Way, visible from the I -75 travel lanes, shall comply with the applicable architectural design guidelines set forth in Division 2.8 of the Land Development Code, and may request alternative architectural design standards as provided in, and in accordance with, the provisions of Section 2.8.2.5 of the Land Development Code. Alternative standards shall be evaluated for their consistency with the purpose; and intent of the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. The purpose of the architectural guidelines and standards is to provide a pleasing visual experience from the I -75 corridor in an effort to create a gateway into Naples and Collier County, thereby advancing the purpose of the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. At such time as Collier County adopts design standards for the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan, those standards shall apply to this PUD. II -5 SECTION III INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 3.1 PURPOSE 8 F .1 -.� The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development pl Tract -15), an for areas designated as , Industrial Development Area on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan. 3.2 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used whole or in part, for other than the following: in A. Principal Uses': 1) Agricultural related services (Industry Numbers 0783); 0711 -0724, 0761, 0782, and 2) Apparel and other finished products as defined under Major Group 23; 3) Automotive repair, services, and parking as defined in Major Group 75; 4) Building construction as defined under Major Group 15; 5) Business services (Industry Numbers 7312, 7313, 7319, 7334 -7336, and 7342 -7389 ); 6) Communications as defined under Major Group 48; 7) Construction — special trade contractors as defined under Major Group 17; 8) Eating and drinking places (Industry Number 5812); 9) Educational services (Industry Numbers 8243 - 8249); 10) Electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment as defined under Major Group 36; 11) Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (Industry Numbers 8711- 8733); 12) Fabricated metal products, except machinery and transportation equipment (Industry Numbers 3411 -3479, and 3499); 13) Food and kindred products (Industry Numbers 2011 - 2099). Slaughtering Plants of any kind are prohibited; 14) Furniture and fixtures as defined under Major Group 25; 15) Heavy construction other than building under Major Group 16; construction- contractors as defined III -2 Reference Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Manual, 1987 Edition. Standard Industrial Classification 8 F i 16) Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment as defined under Major Group 35; 17) Leather and leather products (Industry Numbers 3131 - 3199); 18) Local, and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation as defined under Major Group 41; 19) Lumber and wood products (Industry Numbers 2426, 2431 - 2499); 20) Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks as defined under Major Group 38; 21) Membership organizations (Industry Numbers 8611 and 8631); 22) Miscellaneous manufacturing industries as defined under Major Group 39; 23) Miscellaneous repair services (Industry Number 7692); 24) Motor freight transportation and warehousing (Industry Numbers 4212 - 4226); 25) Paper and allied products (Industry Numbers 2652- 2679); 26) Personal services (Industry Number 7219); 27) Printing, publishing, and allied industries as defined under Major Group 27; 28) Rubber and miscellaneous plastics (Industry Numbers 3021 - 3089); 29) Stone, glass, and concrete products (Industry Numbers 3211, 3251 -3273, and 3281); 30) Textile mill products (Industry Numbers 2211, 2221, 2241, 2251 -2259, and 2273 - 2299); 31) Transportation equipment (Industry Numbers 3714, 3716, 3728, 3732, 3751, 3769, 3792, and 3799); 32) Transportation services (Industry Numbers 4731, and 4783 ); 33) United States Postal Service as defined under Major Group 43; 34) Wholesale trade - durable goods (Industry Numbers 5012 -5014, 5021 -5049, 5063 -5088, 5091, 5092 and 5094); 35) Wholesale trade - nondurable goods (Industry Numbers 5111 -5159, 5181, 5182, and 5199); 36) Any other use which is comparable in nature to the foregoing land uses as determined by the Collier County Planning Services Director. III -3 R B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Parking facilities; 2) Customary accessory and incidental uses and structures associated with pennitted principal uses of this PUD; 3) Retail sales and/or display areas as' accessory to the principal use, not to exceed an area greater than twenty percent (20 %) of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. 3.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Front yard setbacks shall be measured from back of curb or edge of pavement, whichever is closer to the structure. B. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 20,000 square feet. C. AVERAGE LOT WIDTH: 100 feet. D. MINIMUM YARDS: 1) Front Yard: 50 feet; 2) Side Yard: 20 feet; 3) Rear Yard: 15 feet; 4) Waterfront: 25 feet; 4) Yards abutting off -site residential land uses: 50 feet; 5) Parcels with two frontages may reduce one front yard by 10 feet. E. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES: Placement of structures shall be in compliance with NFPA standards for fire safety, with no less than 10 feet of separation. F. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 50 feet. G. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA: 1,000 square feet. H. OFF - STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: As required by Division 2.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of site development plan approval. HI-4 8F I. OUTSIDE STORAGE: Outside storage of manufactured products, raw or finished materials, or vehicles other than passenger vehicles is permitted in this PUD subject to the provision of screening with a fence at least 7 feet in height above ground level from all adjacent or abutting residentially zoned or developed land. Said fence or wall shall be opaque in design, and made of masonry, wood, or other materials approved by the Collier County Planning Services Director. III -5 SECTION IV COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 4.1 PURPOSE 8F "I The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as Tract "C ", Commercial Development Area on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan. 4.2 MAXIMUM COMMERCIAL SQUARE FEET The 7.85± acre Commercial Development Area (Tract "C "), shall not be developed with more than 96,165 square feet of commercial uses. Should a hotel or motel be proposed, a commensurate amount of commercial development opportunity shall be lost, based on a comparison of average annual daily trip generations. 4.3 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses I: 1) Apparel and accessory stores as defined under Major Group 56; 2) Automotive dealers and gasoline service stations (Industry Numbers 5531, and 5541); 3) Building materials, hardware, and garden supply (Industry Numbers 5211- 5261); 4) Business services (Industry Numbers 7311, 7334, and 7371); 5) Carwashes (Industry Number 7542); 6) Eating and drinking places as defined under Major Group 58; 7) Engineering, accounting, research, and management (Numbers 8711 with no outside equipment storage, 8712 with no outside equipment storage, 8721, 8732, 8742, 8743, and 8748); 8) Finance, insurance, and real estate as defined under Major Groups 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, and 67; 9) Food stores as defined under Major Group 54; 10) General merchandise stores as defined under Major Group 53; 11) Government offices as defined under Major Group 91; IV -1 1 Reference Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987 Edition. 12) Home furniture, furnishings, and equipment stores as defined under Major Group 57; 13) Hotels or motels (Industry Number 7011). No more than 150 rooms shall be permitted; 14) Legal services as defined under Major Group 81; 15) Miscellaneous retail as defined under Major Group 59, not including Industry Numbers 5932, 5961, 5983 -5989, and not including the retail sale of fireworks; 16) Motion pictures as defined under Major Group 78; 17) Personal services (Industry Numbers 7211, 7215, 7216 except rug cleaning, 7221 -7291, and 7299, only including car title and tag service, computer photography or portraits, costume rental, dress suit and tuxedo rental, electrolysis (hair removal), hair weaving or replacement service, and tanning salons). B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Parking facilities; 2) One caretaker's residence. 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Front yard setbacks shall be measured from back of curb or edge of pavement, whichever is closer to the structure. B. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 10,000 square feet. C. AVERAGE LOT WIDTH: 100 feet. D. MINIMUM YARDS (INTERNAL): 1) Front Yard: 25 feet, or one -half of the building height as measured from each exterior wall, whichever is greater; 2) Side Yard: 10 feet; 3) Rear Yard: One -half of the building height; 4) Parcels with two frontages may reduce one front yard by 10 feet. E. MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES: Placement of structures shall be in compliance with NFPA standards for fire safety, with no less than 10 feet of separation. F. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 50 feet. IV -2 r F G. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA: 1,000 square feet per principal structure, on the first finished floor. H. MAXIMUM GROSS LEASABLE FLOOR AREA: 96,165 square feet. I. OFF - STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS: As required by Division 2.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of site development plan approval. J. OUTSIDE STORAGE AND DISPLAY: Outside storage and display is prohibited in Tract C as depicted on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan, with the exception of garden centers. K. CARETAKER'S RESIDENCE: One (1) caretaker's residence shall be permitted for the commercial development area, subject to the following: 1) The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the shopping center or one of the commercial buildings, and shall be entered from within that structure. Exits that comply with fire cod -.s shall be permitted. 2) The caretakers' residence shall be an accessory use, and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the shopping center or commercial facilities. 3) Off - street parking shall be as for a single-family residence in accordance with Division 2.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of site development plan approval. Parking for the caretaker's residences shall be in addition to any other required parking facilities. IV -3 SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE 8F The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of the project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with final site development plans, final subdivision plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this PUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the Land Development Code, Division 3.2 shall apply to this project even if the land within the PUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the Master Development Plan and the regulations of the PUD as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor or assignee in title to the developer is bound by any commitments within this agreement. These commitments may be assigned or delegated to a master association to be created by the developer. Upon assignment or delegation, the developer shall be released from responsibility for the commitments. 5.3 PUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan' illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries, or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final, and may be varied at anytime at any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or site development plan application. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5 of the Land Development Code, amendments may be made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and all common areas in the project. C. The Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator, or his designee, shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the White Lake Corporate Park PUD Master Plan upon written request of the developer. 1) The following limitations shall apply to such requests: a. The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the White Lake Corporate Park PUD document. b. The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a substantial change pursuant to Subsection 2.7.3.5.1. of the Collier County Land Development Code. V -1 8F 14' c. The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with adjacent land uses, and shall not create detrimental impacts to abutting land uses, water management facilities, and preserve areas within, or external to the PUD boundaries. 2) The following shall be considered minor changes or refinements, subject to the limitations of Subsection 5.3.C.1) of this document: a. Reconfiguration of preserve areas, jurisdictional wetland limits, and mitigation features as a result of regulatory agency review and permitting. There may be no overall decrease in preserve area. b. Reconfiguration of lakes, or other water management facilities where such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District and Collier County. c. Internal realignment of vehicular circulation patterns. 3) Minor changes and refinements, as described above, shall be reviewed by appropriate County staff to ensure compliance with all applicable County ordinances and regulations prior to the Administrator's consideration for approval. 4) Approval by the Administrator of a minor change or refinement may occur independently from and prior to any application for subdivision or site development plan approval, however, the Administrator's, or his designee's approval shall not constitute an authorization for development or implementation of the minor change or refinement without first obtaining all applicable County permits and approvals. 5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION A. This PUD is subject to the Sunset Provisions of Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code. B. An annual PUD monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section 2.7.3.6 of the Land Development Code. 5.5 TRANSPORTATION The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. The developer shall maintain joint/shared access with the adjacent property (Citygate PUD), via White Lake Boulevard. B. The petitioner shall provide left turn lanes and arterial level street lighting at all project entrances, if deemed warranted by Collier County. The turn lanes and arterial level street lighting shall be provided when requested by the County. C. The petitioner shall be responsible for a fair share contribution of the site related roadway improvements at the Collier Boulevard /White Lake Boulevard intersection, which has been determined to be $118,850.00, and shall be paid to Collier County on or before October 1, 2001. V -2 5.6 ENGINEERING The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Detailed paving, grading site drainage and utility plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed construction with the submitted plans is granted by Engineering Review Services. B. The internal right -of -way cross - section shall be in accordance with the typical section depicted on Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan. C. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code. D. Work within Collier County right -of -way shall meet the requirements of Collier County Right -Of -Way Ordinance 82 -91. E. The project shall be platted in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code to define the right -of -way, tracts, and easements as shown on the Master Plan. 5.7 WATER MANAGEMENT The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. A copy of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Surface Water Permit Application shall be sent to Collier County Development Services with the Subdivision Plat and Construction Pan and /or SDP submittal. A copy of the approval of this SFWMD Surface Water Permit shall be submitted prior to Site Development Plan approval. B. All requirements of Excavation Permit No. 59.133 shall be complied with. If an annual report is not filed, the excavation permit will be considered void in accordance with the Land Development Code and a complete resubmission will be necessary. 5.8 UTILITIES The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. V -3 B. The on -site water distribution system to serve the project must be connected to the District's water main consistent with the main sizing requirements specified in the County's Water Master Plan and extended throughout the project. During design of these facilities, the following features shall be incorporated into the distribution system: 1. Dead -end mains shall be eliminated by looping the internal pipeline network; 2. Stubs for future system interconnection with adjacent properties shall be provided to the east property line of ff_- project, at locations to be mutually agreed to by the County and the Developer during the design phase of the project; 2. The utility construction documents for tae project's sewerage system shall be prepared so that all sewage flowing into the County's sewerage system is transmitted by one (1) irain on -site pump station. The developer's engineer shall meet with the County staff prior to commencing preparation of construction drawings, so that all aspects of the sewerage system design can be coordinated with the County's Sewer Master Plan; 3. The existing off -site water facilities of the District must be evaluated for hydraulic capacity to serve this project and reinforced as required, if necessary, consistent with the County's `'Water Master Plan to insure that the District's water system can hydraulically provide a sufficient quantity of water to meet the anticipated demands for the project, and the District's existing committed capacity. 5.9 ENVIRONMENTAL The development of this PUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A Wetland preserve /conservation areas shall be surveyed prior to construction plan/plat approval. A conservation easement similar to or as per Chapter 704.06 Florida Statutes shall be created and indicated on the plat, and shall be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County. B. All State and Federal permits that may affect the design of this project shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services prior to final subdivision plat approval. C. The use of native species in landscape plans shall be in accordance with Section 2.4.4.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code. D. Prohibited exotic vegetation removal shall be performed in accordance with Section 3.9.6.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. E. Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1. of the Land Development Code, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. F. The mitigation plan for the preserve and buffer areas is provided in the Environmental Impact Statement. V -4 8F G. The PUD Master Plan provides 4.9 acres of conservation area on -site. An additional 6.9 acres of native landscaping will be planted on site, and 0.3 acres of littoral vegetation will be restored along the entire lake bank where it abuts the conservation area. Mitigation planting within conservation areas, buffers and lake littoral zones shall be completed prior to preliminary acceptance of the next phase of the development. 5.10 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Accessory structures shall be constructed simultaneously with, or following the construction of the principal structure, except for a construction site office that may be constructed prior to commencement of infrastructure construction. 5.11 SIGNS All signs shall be in accordance with Division 2.5 of Collier County's Land Development Code, and the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. 5.12 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout the White Lake Corporate Park PUD, except in preserve areas. The following standards shall apply: A. Landscape berms shall have the following maximum side slopes: 1) Grassed berms 3:1 2) Ground covered berms 3:1 3) Rip -Rap berms 1:1 4) Structural walled berms may be vertical. B. Fencing materials shall be of either wood, masonry or similar material, except an eight (8) foot high unified, opaque, modular concrete fence /wall shall be constructed along White Lake Boulevard associated with Tract "I ". A type "D" landscape buffer shall be placed along the street side of said fence /wall. The fence /wall shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet from the White Lake Boulevard right -of -way. Construction of the fence /wall shall occur prior to or concurrently with building construction on each parcel. D. Fence or wall maximum height: 9 feet, as measured from the finished grade of the ground at the base of the fence or wall. For the purpose of this provision, finished grade shall be considered no greater than 18 inches above the crown elevation of the nearest existing road, unless the fence or wall is constructed on a perimeter landscape berm. In these cases, the fence or wall shall not exceed 6 feet in height from the top of berm elevation with an average side slope of greater than 4:1 (i.e. 3:1, 2:1, 1:1, or vertical). D. Pedestrian sidewalks, bike paths, water management facilities and structures may be allowed in landscape buffer areas in accordance with Division 2.4 of the Land Development Code. 5.13 LANDSCAPING FOR OFF - STREET PARKING AREAS Except where provided for elsewhere in this document, all landscaping for off - street parking areas shall be in accordance with Division 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code, and the Activity Center #9 Interchange Master Plan. V -5 r r 1001!1! p� 3 q€ jig z�g P R Iqj_ t! w t� s 3 aiii.N�t. iYXN) ....wcxry r az�axa _; �a all R WIN 11 ��� €�h a oq T� $ G €9 I m - o / _ � r , / I I / 1 \ I t' l I I yg a �N � C y z � EXHIBIT "A " vn trat w:r, nrr.n nn. "ern TA 99 909 ?it �w/ / _e,G Ll4l. HAM 'I ; 1 llc "i �.� i � � �� % � � - Vl� {Nlt� d -�U�l` � �;l�O�, /'Ili 1. ?��f; Vll.7:NG]NI?T RS Developmew Puv MA51 eP FLAW .L %. • • 1 .a. Environmental Consullanls I"..m..91., a,. tr0.Nyw,rru «I« n.r,«.rso. IArt M9waw — — CC %.LIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) — — , H � l 4 74 Crx �z N g �Yr • M. Z 0 ,c V m V) c D A gf_4.. Q _� r� s1 I• _l: l I I R9 �� s • n all R WIN 11 ��� €�h a oq T� $ G €9 I m - o / _ � r , / I I / 1 \ I t' l I I yg a �N � C y z � EXHIBIT "A " vn trat w:r, nrr.n nn. "ern TA 99 909 ?it �w/ / _e,G Ll4l. HAM 'I ; 1 llc "i �.� i � � �� % � � - Vl� {Nlt� d -�U�l` � �;l�O�, /'Ili 1. ?��f; Vll.7:NG]NI?T RS Developmew Puv MA51 eP FLAW .L %. • • 1 .a. Environmental Consullanls I"..m..91., a,. tr0.Nyw,rru «I« n.r,«.rso. IArt M9waw — — CC %.LIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) — — , H � l 4 74 Crx �z N g �Yr • M. Z 0 ,c V m V) c D A STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -59 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 23rd day of October, 2001, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 24th day of October, 2001. DWIGHT E. BROCK•`".....,.�.. Clerk of Courts`) `iie��:L]E�k Ex- officio to °-B' of County Commie's er$"� By: Teri Mich]i;, - .(:.r` Deputy 9A RESOLUTION NO. 2001-414 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING CAROLYN D. SPATTA TO THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 80 -80 created the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council and provides that the Advisory Council shall be composed of eleven (11) regular members, three (3) ex- officio members and two (2) staff members; and WHEREAS, the Board adopted Resolution No. 90 -527 on October 30, 1990 which revised and updated the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council's by -laws by providing that the Advisory Council include two members At Large; and WHEREAS, there is currently a vacancy on this board; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; and WHEREAS, the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council provided the Board of County Commissioners with its recommendations for appointment and has requested that an additional member be appointed to their Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Carolyn D. Spatta is hereby appointed as the Health Department representative to the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council for the remainder of the vacant term, said term expiring August 31, 2003. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: October 23, 2001 J 15V464 ' E, DOCK, Clerk Attest as� C # #man's signature Ve Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel County Attorney ADV BD /kn BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES EVCARTER, Ph.D., Chairman RESOLUTION NO. 2001-415 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ROGER L. SOMERVILLE TO THE FOREST LAKES ROADWAY AND DRAINAGE ADVISORY COMMITTEE WHEREAS, on March 10, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County adopted Ordinance No. 92 -16 which created the Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Advisory Committee for the purpose of assisting the Board in providing and maintaining improved roadway related drainage and roadway restoration as set forth in County Ordinance No. 91 -107; and WHEREAS, there is currently a vacancy on the Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; and i WHEREAS, a memorandum was received from staff advising that the Committee has made its recommendation for appointment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Roger L. Somerville, is hereby appointed to the Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage Advisory Committee to fulfill the remainder of the vacant term, said term to expire on April 21, 2003. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: October 23, 2001 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk A 42 Chairman's ppr d aS Zo form and % q leg lu t• jincy: David C. Weigel County Attorney DCW /kn /advisory hoard BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAMS CARTER, Ph.D., Chairman 1 9C RESOLUTION NO. 2001-416 RESOLUTION REAPPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE HISTORIC /ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -70 created the Historic /Archaeological Preservation Board and provides that the County Commission shall appoint seven (7) members to the Historical /Archaeological Preservation Board; and WHEREAS, there are currently vacancies on this Board for the Law and Citizen -At -Large categories; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; and WHEREAS, the Historical /Archaeological Preservation Board has submitted to the Board of County Commissioners its recommendations for appointment to their board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 1. Diane M. Gonzalez, representing the category of Law, is hereby appointed to the Historic /Archaeological Preservation Board for a 3 year term, said term to expire on October 1, 2004. 2. Joanne M. Quinn, representing the category of Citizen -At- Large, is hereby appointed to the Historic /Archaeological Preservation Board for a 3 year term, said term to expire on October 1, 2004. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby waives the provisions of Section Seven (b)(1) of Ordinance No. 86 -41, as amended, relating to a limitation of two consecutive terms of office, for the purposes of reappointing both Diane M. Gonzalez and Joanne M. Quinn to this Committee. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. ATED: October 23, 2001 A Clerk e!0Y Gy -J1(j1i ©J ,. Attest .ei.,. Chairyn'_ Signature only. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel County Attorney ncwnkn BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA t JAMES i(/ DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 RESOLUTION NO. 2001-418 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE. WHEREAS, on June 26, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Collier County Ordinance No. 2001 -040 establishing the Health and Human Services Committee as an Ad Hoc Advisory Committee; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2001 -40 provides that the Health and Human Services Committee shall be composed of sixteen (16) members; and WHEREAS, there are currently vacancies on this committee; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following members are hereby appointed to the Health and Human Services Committee: MEMBER Ernest Bretzmann Susan A. Luenberger Joseph P. Paterno Dee S. Whinnery Tina Marie Osceola George R. Drobinski Petra M.. Jones Edward A. Morton Fielding W. Epstein Wayne Sakamoto Dr. William P. Lascheid Mark F. Rhein Ed Ferguson Dr. Keith Riley CATEGORY United Way of Collier County Community Foundation of Collier County Southwest Florida Workforce Collier County Public School District Collier County Sheriff's Office Collier County Hunger & Homeless Coalition Collier County Mental Health Association Naples Community Hospital Cleveland Clinic Health Insurance Industry Independent Health Care Provider Banking & Trust Industry Community -Based Care Alliance Dental Association Terms of office of said members shall expire on June 26, 2001. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: October 23, 2001 ATTEST: D�VIG�I1(19. BROCK, Clerk Ile� d 'AtUiCas to Chairman's signature only. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel County Attorney DCW/kn BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA h.D airman 10C RESOLUTION NO. 2001. 4 2 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVING THE USE OF THE FARE BOX REVENUES AND OTHER DONATIONS RECEIVED FROM THE COLLIER AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM COLLECTED ON NOVEMBER 12, 2001 TO BE DONATED TO THE SEPTEMBER 11TH RELIEF FUND. WHEREAS, the Collier County transit system is funded through state and federal grants; and WHEREAS, the local match for the grants is provided by the state toll revenues; and WHEREAS, the fare box revenues are a secondary source of funds; and WHEREAS, Collier County is not mandated to collect fare box revenues; and WHEREAS, Collier County has the ability to reduce fares or provide free trips; and WHEREAS, these "free ride" days are to encourage the use of Collier Area Transit; and WHEREAS, Collier County has taken a position of support in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks; and WHEREAS, the employees of the Collier Area Transit have recommended the fare box revenues and donations collected on November 12, 2001 be donated to the relief effort in New York and Washington D.C. and for the victims and survivors; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS of Collier County, Florida that: 1) The Collier County Board of County Commissioners finds that the donating the one day of transit revenues from the fare box serves the valid public purpose of supporting the nation's healing and recovery of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack; and 2) The donation of fare box revenues and other donations received on November 12, 2001 on the Collier Area Transit System to the September I I'h Relief Fund via the Red Cross September 11`h Disaster Relief Fund, a duly recognized fund for the relief effort, is approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. 110 This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this S3 - day of (W-r68 ER- , 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER, COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR BY: " "" JAMES D. ARTER, PhD., CHAIRMAN t: DWIGHT l✓. 1 OCK, Clerk Attest as t0 ) signature one 0hai►ean's Appr6 1� aS-to Form and `,; Jyegal Suff &ncy cqucqine Hubbard Robinson ssistant County Attorney 10 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 419 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE COUNTY INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM (CIGP), SECTION 339.2817 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES Whereas, the Florida Legislature established the County Incentive Grant Program, Section 339.2817 of the Florida Statutes, to provide state matching funds for local governments projects that directly or indirectly increase the capacity of the Florida Intrastate Highway System or the State Highway System; and Whereas, the matching funds to be provided by the state under the Program were to be from surplus General Revenue in the 2000 -2001, 2001 -2002 and 2002 -2003 State Fiscal Years (FY) and from a reduction of the seven percent (7 %) administrative fee changed by the Florida Department of Revenue for the collection and redistribution of Local Option Gas Tax in FY 2004 -2005 and thereafter; and Whereas, the seven percent (7 %) administrative fee charged by the Department of Revenue is to be reduced to three percent (3 %) with the other four percent (4 %) funding projects selected by the County Incentive Grant Program; and Whereas, the FY 2002 -2003 County Incentive Grant Program applications were submitted, reviewed and competitively selected based upon their improvement to the Florida State Intrastate Highway System and the State Highway System; and Whereas, Collier County was awarded a grant of $3,659,250 for Phase IV Livingston Road from Immokalee Road to the Lee County Line in FY 2002 -2003; and Whereas, after being informed of the award of the grant, the State now finds that its General Revenue funding is reduced and, in response, has chosen not to submit the selected County Incentive Grant Program projects to the Florida Legislature as part of the Governor's budget request. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, FLORIDA: 1. That the Collier County Board of County Commissioners requests that the planned reduction in the administrative fee charged by the Florida Department of Revenue to collect and redistribute the Local Government Option Gas Taxes from seven percent (7 %) to three percent (3 %) be accelerated from the State Fiscal Year 2004 -2005 to Fiscal Year 2002 -2003 and the proceeds of the four percent (4 %) be used to fund the FY 2002- 2003 projects, including the $3,659,250 for the Livingston Road Phase IV improvements, as previously selected under the Program. 2. That the Florida Legislature repeal Section 339.2817, Florida Statutes, unless an alternative state funding source is made available to fund the Program, and that the reduction of four percent (4 %) in the Florida Department of Revenue's administrative fee be made permanent effective July 1, 2003, with the resulting funds returned to the County from which it is collected as part of its Local Government Option Gas Tax proceeds used to meet the County's transportation needs. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED THIS d1 DAY OF C)M'?F-9 AFTER A MOTION; SECOND AND MAJORITY VOTE FAVORING SAME. tiyiltil �lldl±ll, ATTS'I =: sniChA1rVia's y• B Y• ` Dw g f E: )3rock, Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: Lk L J cqudline Hubbard Robinson, County Attorney i COLLIER COUNTY BCC By: James D:'Carter, PH. D., Chairman, Collier County BCC lOG 'I MEMORANDUM Date: October 24, 2001 To: Nancy Bradley, Legal Assistant Office of the County Attorney From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Agreement for Sale and Purchase Between Ricky Stauffer, Paul Harvey, and Beach Club Associates and Collier County Enclosed please find three original documents as referenced above, Agenda Item #10G, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 23, 2001. The other original is being retained for the record. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 7240. Thank you. Enclosures (3) 10G ad AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE THIS AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE ( "AGREEMENT ") is made by and between RICKY STAUFFER, PAUL HARVEY, and BEACH CLUB ASSOCIATES, a Florida general partnership (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Seller "), and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (hereinafter referred to as "Purchaser "). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of that certain parcel of real property (hereinafter referred to as "Property "), located in Collier County, State of Florida, and being more particularly described as follows, to wit: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. WHEREAS, Purchaser is desirous of purchasing the Property, subject to the conditions and other agreements hereinafter set forth, and Seller is agreeable to such sale and to such conditions and agreements. NOW, THEREFORE, and for and in consideration of the premises and the respective undertakings of the parties hereinafter set forth and the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows: AGREEMENT 1.01 In consideration of the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Seller shall sell to Purchaser and Purchaser shall purchase from Seller the Property, described above. II. PAYMENT OF PURCHASE PRICE 2.01 The purchase price (the "Purchase Price ") for the Property shall be FOUR MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($4,750,000.00). III. CLOSING 3.01 The Closing (THE "CLOSING DATE ", "DATE OF CLOSING ", OR "CLOSING ") of the transaction shall be held on or before sixty (60) days following execution of this Agreement by the Purchaser but not later than December 21, 2001, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. The Closing shall be held at the Collier County Attorney's Office, Administration Building, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida. The procedure to be followed by the parties in connection with the Closing shall be as follows: 3.011 Seller shall convey a marketable title free of any liens, encumbrances, exceptions, or qualifications, except as contemplated by Article IV. At the Closing, the Seller shall cause to be delivered to the Purchaser the items specified herein and the following documents and instruments duly executed and acknowledged, in recordable form: 3.0111 Warranty Deed in favor of Purchaser conveying title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than: (a) The lien for current taxes and assessments. NAP:24953:4 10G (b) Such other easements, restrictions or conditions of record, or shown by an accurate survey or by an inspection of the Property. 3.0112 Mechanics Lien and Possession Affidavit. 3.0113 Combined Purchaser - Seller closing statement. 3.0114 A "non- foreign person affidavit" as required by Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code. 3.0115 A W -9 Form, "Request for Taxpayer Identification and Certification" as required by the Internal Revenue Service. 3.0116 Such instruments as may be required by the title insurance underwriter in order to insure the "gap" and to issue the policy contemplated by the title insurance commitment. 3.0117 An Assignment of Paul Harvey's lessee rights in the lease of the Property. 3.012 At the Closing, the Purchaser, or its assignee, shall cause to be delivered to the Seller the following: 3.0121 When the title company is irrevocably committed to issue an owner's title insurance policy to Purchaser in accordance with the commitment immediately after recording of the deed without any gap exception the County shall pay the Purchase Price after prorations, to Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell P.A.'s trust account by a wire transfer of immediately available funds. 3.0122 Funds payable to the Seller representing the cash payment due at Closing in accordance with Article III hereof, shall be subject to adjustment for prorations as hereinafter set forth. 3.02 Each party shall be responsible for payment of its own attorney's fees, e*eep a orn vs_fee� -be- paid as- eonternplated by --�- tbp�nt of a default whPr�_ Article -)4: -- -Seller, at its sole cost and expense, shall pay the cost of recording any instruments necessary to clear Seller's title to the Property. Seller shall pay at Closing all documentary stamp taxes due relating to the recording of the Warranty Deed, in accordance with Chapter 201.01, Florida Statutes. dl 3.03 Purchaser shall pay for at Closing the cost of recording the Warranty Deed. The cost of the Owner's Form B Title Policy, issued pursuant to the Commitment provided for in Section 4.011 below, shall be paid by Purchaser. The cost of the title commitment shall be paid by Purchaser. Real Property taxes shall be prorated based on the current year's tax with due allowance made for maximum allowable discount, homestead and any other applicable exemptions and paid by Seller. If Closing occurs at a date which the current year's millage is not fixed, taxes will be prorated based upon such prior year's millage. IV. REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 4.01 Upon execution of this Agreement by both parties or at such other time as specified within this Article, Purchaser and /or Seller, as the case may be, shall perform the following within the times stated, which shall be conditions precedent to the Closing; 4.011 Purchaser shall within fifteen (15) days after the effective date of this Agreement update its present commitment for an Owner's Title Insurance Policy covering the Property, if such update has new defects which materially and adversely affect the Property ( "New Defects] "), Purchaser shall have NAP:24953:4 2 10G twenty (20) days from the effective date of this Agreement to notify Seller in writing of any objection to a New Defect(s) which is not a Permitted Exception, other than liens evidencing monetary obligations, if any, which obligations shall be paid at Closing. "Permitted Exceptions" shall include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) applicable zoning regulations, ordinances and governmental restrictions of Purchaser and all other governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the use of the Property; and (2) real property taxes and assessments for 2001, which are not yet due and payable. (3) all exceptions shown by the existing title evidence, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "B ", with the requirement that existing mortgages, or other encumbrances if any, shall be satisfied at or prior to Closing. 4.012 If Purchaser shall fail to advise the Seller in writing of any such objections in Seller's title in the manner herein required by this Agreement, the title shall be deemed acceptable. Upon notification of Purchaser's objection to title, Seller shall have thirty (30) days to remedy any defects in order to convey good and marketable title, except for liens or monetary obligations which will be satisfied at Closing. Seller, at its sole expense, shall use its best efforts to make such title good and marketable. In the event Seller is unable to cure said objections within said time period, Purchaser, by providing written notice to Seller within two (2) days after expiration of said thirty (30) day period, may accept title as it then is, waiving any objection; or Purchaser may terminate the Agreement. A failure by Purchaser to give such written notice of termination within the time period provided herein shall be deemed an election by Purchaser to accept the exceptions to title as shown in the title commitment. 4.013 Purchaser shall have the option, at its own expense, to obtain an update of the survey of the Property provided by Seller. No adjustments to the Purchase Price shall be made based upon any change to the total acreage as referenced in the aforementioned legal description, if any. Purchaser shall do its update of the Survey within fifteen (15) days and if there are any items which materially and adversely affect the Property and are not part of the Permitted Exceptions, Purchaser shall have the right for a period of twenty (20) days from the effective date of this agreement to object to such item and it shall be treated as a title objection made in accordance with 4.012 and if no objection is made within such twenty (20) day period any right to make such an objection is waived. V. NON - ADMISSIBILITY IN OTHER PROCEEDINGS. 5.01 Purchaser and Seller acknowledge and agree that neither this Agreement, its exhibits nor any of the negotiations relating thereto may be used in any litigation or other proceedings except for enforcement of this Agreement or provisions of this Agreement. VI. ACCESS TO PROPERTY 6.01 Purchaser and its agents, employees and servants shall, at their own risk and expense, have the right to go upon the Property for the purpose of surveying the Property. Purchaser and its agents in performing such activity shall indemnify Seller on account of any loss or damages occasioned thereby and against any claim made against Seller as a result of Purchaser's entry. Seller shall be notified by Purchaser no less than twenty four (24) hours prior to such entry on the Property. NAP:24953:4 3 10G VII. RELEASE OF CLAIMS 7.01 At closing, Seller agrees to execute a general release of all claims it has now, foreseen or unforeseen, against the County which arise out of or relate to the use, enjoyment and /or purchase of the Property in any way, or were raised in the litigation referenced in Section 7.02, including all costs and attorney's fees. 7.02 At closing, Seller shall execute and file a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice as to all claims and actions against Marla Ramsey, in Ricky Stauffer and Paul Harvey v. Collier County, and Marla Ramsey, Circuit Court Case No. 01- 3051-CA , assuming each party (including Marla Ramsey) shall bear the cost of their respective attorney's fees and costs, and the Notice shall so state. If Ms. Ramsey is so dismissed, Ms. Ramsey and the Sellers will exchange a general release of all claims each has now, foreseen or unforeseen, against each other which arise out of or relate to the use, enjoyment and/or purchase of the Property in any way, or were raised in the litigation referenced in Section 7.02, including all costs and attorney's fees. VIII. POSSESSION 8.01 Purchaser shall be entitled to full possession of the Property at Closing. IX. PRORATIONS 9.01 Ad valorem taxes next due and payable, after closing on the Property, shall be prorated at Closing based upon the gross amount of 2001 taxes, and shall be paid by Seller. X. TERMINATION AND REMEDIES 10.01 If Seller shall have failed to perform any of the covenants and /or agreements contained herein which are to be performed by Seller, within ten (10) days of written notification of such failure, Purchaser may, at its option, terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of termination to Seller. Purchaser shall have the right to seek and enforce all rights and remedies available at law or in equity to a contract vendee, including, but not limited to, the right to seek specific performance of this Agreement. 10.02 If the Purchaser has not terminated this Agreement pursuant to any of the provisions authorizing such termination, and Purchaser fails to close the transaction contemplated hereby or otherwise fails to perform any of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement as required on the part of Purchaser to be performed, provided Seller is not in default, then the Seller shall have all rights and remedies available at law or in equity including, but not limited to, the right to seek specific performance of this Agreement. XI. SELLER'S AND PURCHASER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 11.01 Seller and Purchaser represent and warrant the following: 11.011 Seller and Purchaser have full right and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement and to undertake all actions and to perform all tasks required of each hereunder. Seller is not presently the subject of a pending, threatened or contemplated bankruptcy proceeding. 11.012 Seller has full right, power, and authority to own and operate the Property, and to execute, deliver, and perform its obligations under this Agreement and the instruments executed in connection herewith, and to consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. All necessary authorizations and approvals have been obtained authorizing Seller and Purchaser to execute and consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. NAP:24953:4 4 IOG r , At Closing, certified copies of such approvals and authorizations shall be delivered to Purchaser and /or Seller, if necessary. 11.013 The warranties set forth in this paragraph shall be true on the date of this Agreement and as of the date of Closing. The warranties in this Agreement shall survive for a period of 1 year after the Closing and shall be of no force and effect thereafter, except for breaches which have occurred within the one (1) year period and actions thereon which have been started within the one (1) year period and counterclaims and defenses relating to such action. 11.014 Seller represents that it has no knowledge of any actions, suits, claims, proceedings, litigation or investigations pending or threatened against Seller, at law, equity or in arbitration before or by any federal, state, municipal or other governmental instrumentality that relate to this agreement or any other property that could, if continued, adversely affect Seller's ability to sell the Property to Purchaser according to the terms of this Agreement. 11.015 No party or person other than Purchaser has any right or option to acquire the Property or any portion thereof. 11.016 Until the date fixed for Closing, so long as this Agreement remains in force and effect, Seller shall not encumber or convey any portion of the Property or any rights therein, nor enter into any agreements granting any person or entity any rights with respect to the Property or any part thereof, without first obtaining the written consent of Purchaser to such conveyance, encumbrance, or agreement which consent may be withheld by Purchaser for any reason whatsoever which would affect the Property after Purchaser's purchase or in any way impair Purchaser's acquisition of the Property. 11.017 Seller represents that there are no incinerators, septic tanks or cesspools on the Property; all waste, if any, is discharged into a public sanitary sewer system; Seller represents that they have (it has) no knowledge that any pollutants are or have been discharged from the Property (except to the extent if any pollutants have come onto the Property from adjoining property), directly or indirectly into any body of water. Seller represents the Property has not been used for the production, handling, storage, transportation, manufacture or disposal of hazardous or toxic substances or wastes, as such terms are defined in applicable laws and regulations, or any other activity that would have toxic results, and no such hazardous or toxic substances are currently used in connection with the operation of the Property, and there is no proceeding or inquiry by any authority with respect thereto. Seller represents that they have (it has) no knowledge that there is ground water contamination on the Property or potential of ground water contamination from neighboring properties. Seller represents no storage tanks for gasoline or any other substances are or were located on the Property at any time during or prior to Seller's ownership thereof. Seller represents none of the Property has been used as a sanitary landfill. 11.018 Seller has no knowledge that the Property and Seller's operations concerning the Property are in violation of any applicable Federal, State or local statute, law or regulation, or of any notice from any governmental body has been served upon Seller claiming any violation of any law, ordinance, code or regulation or requiring or calling attention to the need for any work, repairs, construction, alterations or installation on or in connection with the Property in order to comply with any laws, ordinances, codes or regulation with which Seller has not complied. 11.019 There are no unrecorded written restrictions, written easements or written rights of way (other than existing zoning regulations and other applicable governmental regulations) that restrict the use of the Property, and there are no maintenance, construction, advertising, management, leasing, NAP:24953:4 5 1OG 11-114 employment, service or other contracts affecting the Property which would affect Purchaser's use of the Property or obligate Purchaser to any obligation. 11.020 Seller has no knowledge that there are any suits, actions or arbitration, bond issuances or proposals therefor, proposals for public improvement assessments, pay -back agreements, paving agreements, road expansion or improvement agreements, utility moratoriums, use moratoriums, improvement moratoriums, administrative or other proceedings or governmental investigations or requirements, formal or informal, existing or pending or threatened which affects the Property or which adversely affects Seller's ability to perform hereunder; nor is there any other charge or expense upon or related to the Property which has not been disclosed to Purchaser in writing prior to the effective date of this Agreement. The foregoing is not intended to include requirements of recorded agreements or actions or restrictions of Purchaser. 11.021 Seller acknowledges and agrees that Purchaser is entering into this Agreement based upon Seller's representations stated above and on the understanding that Seller will not cause the zoning or physical condition of the Property to change from its existing state on the effective date of this Agreement up to and including the Date of Closing. Therefore, Seller agrees not to enter into any contracts or agreements pertaining to or affecting the Property and not to do any act or omit to perform any act which would change the zoning or physical condition of the Property or the governmental ordinances or laws governing same. Seller also agrees to notify Purchaser promptly of any change in the facts contained in the foregoing representations and of any notice or proposed change in the zoning, or any other action or notice, that may be proposed or promulgated by any third parties or any governmental authorities having jurisdiction of the development of the property which may restrict or change any other condition of the Property. 11.022 At the Closing, Seller and Purchaser shall each deliver a statement (hereinafter called the "Closing Representative Statement ") reasserting the foregoing representations as of the Date of Closing, which provisions shall survive the Closing for a period of one (1) year thereafter and thereafter shall become null and void except for breaches which have occurred within the one (1) year period and actions thereon which have been started within the one (1) year period and counterclaims and defenses relating to such action. 11.023 Seller represents, warrants and agrees to indemnify, reimburse, defend and hold Purchaser harmless from any and all costs (including attorney's fees) asserted against, imposed on or incurred by Purchaser, directly or indirectly, pursuant to or in connection with the application of any federal, state, local or common law relating to pollution or protection of the environment which shall be in accordance with, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq., ( "CERCLA" or "Superfund "), which was amended and upgraded by the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ( "SARA "), including any amendments or successor in function to these acts. This provision and the rights of Purchaser, hereunder, shall survive Closing and are not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title except that such representations, warranties and rights shall be null and void at the end of one (1) year after Closing except for breaches which have occurred within the one (1) year period after Closing and actions thereon which have been started within the one (1) year period after Closing and counterclaims and defenses relating to such action. 11.024 Any loss and/or damage to the Property between the date of this Agreement and the date of Closing shall be Seller's sole risk and expense. NAP:24953:4 10G XII. NOTICES 12.01 Any notice, request, demand, instruction or other communication to be given to either party hereunder shall be in writing, sent by registered, or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: If to Purchaser: Real Property Management Department Administration Building, 4' Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 With a copy to: Ellen T. Chadwell, Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney Administration Building, 8th Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 If to Seller: Ms. Ricky Stauffer Post Office Box 2354 Bonita Springs, Florida 34133 and: Paul Harvey 1277 Bellaire Court Naples, FL 34110 With a copy to: John L. Farquhar, Esq. Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. 5150 North Tamiami Trail, Suite 602 Naples, Florida 34103 12.02 The addressees and addresses for the purpose of this Article may be changed by either party by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided herein. For the purpose of changing such addresses or addressees only, unless and until such written notice is received, the last addressee and respective address stated herein shall be deemed to continue in effect for all purposes. XIII. REAL ESTATE BROKERS 13.01 Seller shall indemnify Purchaser and hold Purchaser harmless from and against any claim or liability for commission or fees to any broker or any other person or party claiming to have been engaged by Seller as a real estate broker, salesman or representative, in connection with this Agreement. Seller agrees to pay any and all commissions or fees at closing pursuant to the terms of a separate agreement, if any, made by Seller. Purchaser shall indemnify Seller and hold Seller harmless from and against any claim or liability for commission or fees to any broker or any other person or party claiming to have been engaged by Purchaser as a real estate broker, salesman or representative, in connection with this Agreement. Purchaser agrees to pay any and all commissions or fees at closing pursuant to the terms of a separate agreement, if any, made by Purchaser. IX. MISCELLANEOUS 14.01 This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts which together shall constitute the agreement of the parties and facsimiles and other copies shall have the same validity as originals. 14.02 This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shall be effective as of the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, NAP:24953:4 7 1OG ,0 personal representatives, successors, successor trustee, and assignees whenever the context so requires or admits. 14.03 Any amendment to this Agreement shall not bind any of the parties hereof unless such amendment is in writing and executed and dated by Purchaser and Seller. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be binding upon Purchaser and Seller as soon as it has been executed by both parties. 14.04 Captions and section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only; in no way do they define, describe, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any provisions hereof. 14.05 All terms and words used in this Agreement, regardless of the number and gender in which used, shall be deemed to include any other gender or number as the context or the use thereof may require. 14.06 No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be applicable only to the specific instance to which it is related and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver as to such provision or a waiver as to any other provision. 14.07 If any date specified in this Agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, then the date to which such reference is made shall be extended to the next succeeding business day. 14.08 Seller is aware of and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. 14.09 If the Seller holds the Property in the form of a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall make a written public disclosure, according to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, under oath, of the name and address of every person having a beneficial interest in the Property before Property held in such capacity is conveyed to Collier County. (If the corporation is registered with the Federal Securities Exchange Commission or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose stock is for sale to the general public, it is hereby exempt from the provisions of Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.) 14.10 This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. XV. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 15.01 This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto contain the entire agreement between the parties, and no promise, representation, warranty or covenant not included in this Agreement or any such referenced agreements has been or is being relied upon by either party. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless made in writing and executed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. NAP:24953:4 8 10G IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set forth their hands seals. Dated Project/Acquisition Approved by BCC: AS TO PURCHASER: DATED: ATTFS, per,,,,,. DWj Tq!'',.+� QCK, Clerk N t. 7. Deputy dierk Att*4 as. , to'C�#'rvan ' s AS TO SELLERS: DATED: WITNESSES: T WITNESS (Signature) (P ame) Zti =��� SECOND WITNESS (Signature) rb%os 91 Rare (Print Name) DATED: WITNESSES: FI �—I JTNE%SS (Signat re) (Pri e) X, SECOND WITNES (Signature) rAewf5 �. ,� ©1-r (Print Name) NAP:24953:4 BOARD OF COUNTY COLLIER COUNTY, i 1w MMISSIONERS ri o AAA , Ph.D., Chairman DATED: WITNESSES: / / "-;, � 7 -; �?: - ��� Fl N S 7 (Signa ure) (Print me) t- SEC ND WITNESS (Signature) lArn / - (Print Name) DATED: WITNESSES: F RSTIA T S (5 nature (Print . l SECOI�p WITNESS (Signature) Th owvs 4, Rv If (Print Name) Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Ellen T. C well Assistant County Attorney NAP:24953:4 10 106 BEACH CLUB ASSOCIATES, a Florida Gena Partnershi j RI KY ST LIFER, a g al partner i BEACH CLUB ASSOCIATES, a Florida I Partnership general pa 4 1 1� '41 9 • � M � 4t4 ' 1�a y 1# 1 PAGE iOG 0o wmxw� o� *Mal z ,rte ,�ppare w wtadz 0 CA 0n p N q -4p x xM nr y .. - to O 2 O oo M M W o tz7 O O ono x►.j z 2� f otx� CM Oz 8C�rp a xis O �p �n�a� c� O�nw M 0�E0� ACJ) 0� 9b�rom z zn�r�7-Oc.�n00 p � oawm � :0 !0 G z > 2dz zozz � 194zom z z e d d w cna yo� rvn ° o z .-g o o tzj � o d r tlTT� v' Wn� cnw� `�z�aH� "��� OR CA ►v o .r�(A 00 `�o z y yam. -C+1 O yt/1� p �c 0 tai CDO '=J O mR = OC O aOO! to cn w°o � xb t4 oo r°H N tid o o ...� lutvl.Rmm� o O yy ° ax �a ► m A°b � * O r=' Rap 0 tAl �O a�lw�, \max tl�� r=ip °�a�t7 �� on'�v� y rAj (A 14 aC .--, � z MOO H � �p iVo OZ02 � ,.�mms COX m 4? co °��,, boy. nay app m��(At�'zm,.,,�0 Qa� �� 0z nW 0 •� oww t to F moo ooh tv ftj 9 in :00 x � ZnO�,O y2 C° o�a n�xa�o z o "� �C-) °Z��zy� x O � � �, �� �0 - 0cnod�� w O zoo [ x0� 04Z 00 cl b E0 x Cry n� -. y b � � �O z a �x t� d n .��• + :00 O . _ °x a .. wj .axe VI i b °0 ogwz �xH�:xw O C mN� 1A.� z OD Z d �aNrj W d�ca am txj i 10G- LAWYE" Tr>(-LE INSURANCE COR.PORATTON National Headquarters Richmond, Virginia SCBEDULE B II cont'd Exceptions The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions co the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: NOTE: Should you desire to review copies of the documents listed as title exceptions below, please call Cheryl A. Harmon at 1. Defects, liens, encumbrances, ad,: et<e claims or oche: =Hers, if any, created, fast appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective dace hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires for value of record the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 2. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 3. Easements, or claims of casements, not shown by the public records. 4. Encroachments, overlaps, boundary line disputes, or other matters which would be disclosed by an accurate survey or inspection of the premises. 5. Any lieu, or right to alien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hcrcatter fwvished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records 6, Any adverse claim to any portion of said land which bas been created by artificial means or has accreted to any such por4ort so Created and riparian rights, if any. NOTE: The policy issued pursuant to this commitment w l not contain, under Schedule B, the above Standard Exceptions as set forth herein, 'provided that: (1) The company is in receipt oft (a) Acceptable affidavits of no -liens and no parties in possession. (b) Satisfactory current survey of subject property. And, (2) It is determined that: (a) The current year's taxes and/or special assessments have been paid. (b) "There is nothing of record which may give rise to mechanic's liens which could take priority over the policy insured herein. 7_ Taxes for 2001 became a lien on the land on January 1, 2001 although not due and payable until on or after November 1, 2001 (folio # 00156360005)- Taxes for 2000 have been paid in the amount of $693.48. 8. Easements and reservations recorded in OR Book 172, page 40, OR Book 231, page 511 and OR Book 232, page 359, as modified in OR Book 766, page 1758, OR Book 779, page 436, OR Book 783, page 956, OR Book 1156, page 953 and OR Book 1459, page 661, Public Records of Collier County, Florida_ 9. A search of the Public Records fails to reveal legal access to the subject property therefore ingress and egress are neither g 7 anteed nor insured. 10. Amy adverse claim to any portion of said land which has been created by artificial means of has accreted to any such portion so created and riparian ri*ts, if any. Schedule B - Section 2 - Page 1 Case No.: 374541 EXHIMITE— PAGE =z LAN YERS TITLE INSURANCE?' CORPORATION National Headquarters = Richmond, Virginia SC=DULE B II cont'd Exceprions 10G 11. Rikhts and easements of the United States government for commerce, navigation, recreation and fisheries in and to gay portion of said land which has been ercared by anificial means or accreted to any portion so created, and riparian righu, if any. 12. The rights, if any, of the public to use as a public b".-.h or re=ztianal area any pant of the land lying between the body of water abutting subject property and the natural Iine of vegetation, bluM extreme high water line of other apparent boundary separating the publicly used area from the tTland private area. 13. Andy claim to any portion of said Iand tying below flee memn high water line of adjacent water way. 14. Rights and easements of the State and Federal government for commerce, navigation, recreation and fisheries in and to any portion of said land lying below the mean high water line of adjacent water way. 15. Temss and conditions of the Beach Club Associates Partnership Agreement recorded in OR Book 2327, page 3117, as modified in OR Book 2650, page 1918, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 16. Terms and conditions of an unrrcorded Lease of Va~ant Land and First Kight of Refusal dated 9!1/99 referred to in insrrunient recorded in OR Book 2650, page 1918, public Records of Collier County, Florida I „.. T. rte_ i'Arr: n Schedule B - Section 2 - page 2 Case No.: 37454 I I 10H .: THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE 2001 TOURISM AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND THE TOURISM ALLIANCE OF COLLIER COUNTY TO INCLUDE EXPENDITURES UP TO $500,000 FOR THE DISASTER RECOVERY MARKETING PLAN FOR COLLIER COUNTY FROM THE DISASTER RECOVERY FUND AND THE CURRTENT FY02 BUDGET THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this2j�4day of October, 2001, by and between Tourism Alliance of Collier County, a Florida corporation, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY." WHEREAS, the COUNTY has adopted a Tourist Development Plan (hereinafter referred to as "Plan ") funded by proceeds from the Tourist Development Tax; and WHEREAS, the Plan provides that certain of the revenues generated by the Tourist Development Tax are to be allocated for the promotion and advertising of Collier County nationally and internationally and for the promotion and advertising of activities or events intended to bring tourists to Collier County and special events; and WHEREAS, GRANTEE has applied to the Tourist Development Tax Council (TDC) and the County to use Tourist Development Tax funds for the advertising and promotion of Collier County nationally and internationally and special events; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY desires to fund advertising, promotion and special events pursuant to this Third Amended Agreement for a period of up to sixty (60) days from the date of approval of the Second Amended Agreement (hereinafter "the extension period ") in order to provide funding for a Disaster Recovery Marketing Plan as requested by the Tourism Alliance, until a new agreement or method of expending Tourist Development Tax dollars has been decided upon; NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE MUTUAL COVENANTS AND PREMISES PROVIDED HEREIN, AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: I. SCOPE OF WORK: In accordance with the Budget attached as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit `B" the GRANTEE shall provide for the advertising and promotion of Collier County and additional advertising and promotion pursuant to a Disaster Recovery Marketing Pan as requested by the Tourism Alliance. The attached Exhibit `B" outlines the Disaster Recovery Marketing 10H Plan by the Tourism Alliance for Collier County that will be funded with revenues from the Tourist Development Tax. 2. PAYMENT: The amount to be paid under Exhibit "A" to this Agreement shall be for the remaining funds in the Tourism Alliance Fiscal Year 2001 Budget, any approved funds from the 2002 budget, and all funding pursuant to the requested budget in Exhibit `B ". The amount to be paid pursuant to Exhibit `B" to this agreement shall not exceed Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00). The amount that will be paid from the Disaster Recovery Fund (196) shall not exceed Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) for National Cable Networks and Spot Market Television Advertising and the remaining Two Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) will come from the current FY02 budget pursuant to the Exhibit "B ". All funding, pursuant to Exhibit "A" and "B ", including funding from the Fiscal Year 2002 Budget, during this extension period, shall be requested from and must receive the express approval of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Funding is approved only to the end of the extension period and this agreement shall terminate of its own accord sixty (60) days from October 9, 2001. No expenditures shall be made following the termination date of this agreement. The GRANTEE shall, during the extension period, receive prior approval from the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, or request reimbursement for all expenditures following the effective date of the Second Amended Agreement on October 9, 2001. The GRANTEE shall be paid in accordance with fiscal procedures of the County for expenditures incurred for the promotion and advertising expenses as described in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" upon submittal of an invoice and upon verification that the services described in the invoice are completed or that goods have been received. GRANTEE shall determine that the goods and services have been properly provided, and shall submit invoices to the County Manager or his designee. The County Manager or his designee shall determine that the invoice payments are authorized and the goods or services covered by such invoice have been provided or performed in accordance with such authorization. The line item budget attached as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" shall constitute authorization of the expenditure described in the invoices provided that such expenditure is made in accordance with this Agreement. 2 10H Each invoice submitted by GRANTEE shall be itemized in sufficient detail for audit thereof and shall be supported by copies of corresponding vendor invoices and proof of receipt of goods or performance of the services invoiced. GRANTEE shall certify in writing that all subcontractors and vendors have been paid for work and materials from previous payments received prior to receipt of any further payments. The COUNTY shall not pay GRANTEE until the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners pre- audits payment invoices in accordance with the law. GRANTEE shall be paid for its actual cost not to exceed the total amount for various line items and up to the maximum amount budgeted pursuant to the Attached Exhibit "A" and Exhibit Im 3. ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES Only eligible expenditures described in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit `B" will be paid by COUNTY and only if inconformity with Paragraph 2 hereirL Any expenditures paid by COUNTY which are later deemed to be ineligible expenditures shall be repaid to COUNTY within 30 days of COUNTY's written request to repay said funds. COUNTY may request repayment of funds for a period of up to one year after termination of this Agreement or any extension or renewal thereof. 4. INSURANCE: GRANTEE is required to submit a Certificate of Insurance naming Collier County, and its Board of County Commissioners and the Tourist Development Council as additionally insured. The certificate must be valid for the duration of this Agreement, and be issued by a company licensed in the State of Florida, and provide General Liability Insurance for no less than the following amounts: BODILY INJURY LIABILITY $300,000 each claim per person PROPERTY DAMAGE LIABILITY $300,000 each claim per person PERSONAL INJURY LIABILITY $300,000 each claim per person WORKER'S COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYER'S LIABILITY- Statutory The Certificate of Insurance must be delivered to the County Manager or his designee within ten days of execution of this Agreement by the COUNTY. The GRANTEE shall not commence promotional and advertising activities which are to be funded pursuant to this Agreement until the Certificate of Insurance has been received by the COUNTY. 5. BI- WEEKLY REPORTS: GRANTEE shall provide to County bi- weekly reports during the extension period on the duties performed and service provided by GRANTEE, its 3 10H vendors or subcontractors, pursuant to this Agreement. The report shall identify the amount spent during the preceding 14 days and the duties performed, and the services provided and goods delivered during said period. GRANTEE shall take reasonable measures to assure the continued satisfactory performance of all vendors and subcontractors during the extension period. 6. CHOICE OF VENDORS AND FAIR DEALING: GRANTEE may select vendors or subcontractors to provide services as described in Exhibit A. COUNTY shall not be responsible for paying vendors and shall not be involved in the selection of subcontractors or vendors. GRANTEE agrees to disclose any relationship between GRANTEE and the subcon- tractors or vendors, including, but not limited to, similar or related employees, agents, officers, directors and/or shareholders. COUNTY may, in its discretion, object to the reasonableness of expenditures and require repayment if invoices have been paid under this Agreement for unreasonable expenditures. The reasonableness of the expenditures shall be based on industry standards. 7. INDEMNIFICATION: The GRANTEE shall hold harmless and defend COUNTY, and its agents and employees, from any and all suits and actions including attorney's fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the COUNTY by any employee of the named GRANTEE, any subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed or authorized to perform work by any of them. The GRANTEE's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon Agreement price as shown in this Agreement or the GRANTEE's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. 8. NOTICES: All notices from the COUNTY to the GRANTEE shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the GRANTEE at the following address: Tourism Alliance of Collier County George Percel 5395 Park Central Court Naples, Florida 34109 All notices from the GRANTEE to the COUNTY shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the COUNTY to: Jane E. Eichhorn TDC Coordinator 4 10H 3050 N. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 145 Naples, Florida 34104 The GRANTEE and the COUNTY may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification pursuant to this Section. 9. NO PARTNERSHIP: Nothing herein contained shall be construed as creating a partnership between the COUNTY and the GRANTEE, or its vendor or subcontractor, or to constitute the GRANTEE, or its vendor or subcontractor, as an agent or employee of the COUNTY. 10, TERMINATION: The COUNTY or the GRANTEE may cancel this Second Amended Agreement during the extension period with or without cause by giving 5 days advance written notice of such termination, specifying the effective date of the termination. If the COUNTY terminates this Agreement, the COUNTY will pay the GRANTEE for all expenditures incurred, or contractual obligations incurred with subcontractors and vendors, by GRANTEE up to the effective date of the termination so long as such expenses are eligible. Provided, however, or if GRANTEE fails to hold the event or activity, GRANTEE shall pay to COUNTY all funds expended by COUNTY pursuant to this Agreement, unless the Board of County Commissioners determines that the completed promotion and advertising of the event or activity were sufficient to justify the use of tourist development tax funds. The County at the conclusion of the extension period shall retain all unexpended and unencumbered funds. Upon termination of this agreement, GRANTEE shall provide the County with a full accounting of all expenditures for Fiscal Year 2001, including the extension period. 11. GENERAL ACCOUNTING: GRANTEE is required to maintain complete and accurate accounting records and keep tourism funds in a separate checking account. All revenue related to the Agreement should be recorded, and all expenditures must be incurred within the term of this Agreement. 12. AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS: GRANTEE shall maintain records, books, documents, papers and financial information pertaining to work performed under this Agreement. GRANTEE agrees that the COUNTY, or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to, and the right to examine and photocopy any pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of GRANTEE involving transactions related to this Agreement. 61 W111 13. PROHIBITION OF ASSIGNMENT: GRANTEE shall not assign, convey, or transfer in whole or in part its interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. 14, TERM: This Third Amended Agreement became effective on October 1, 2001 and shall terminate no later than December 1, 2001. 15. AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS This Agreement is subject to budget and collection of tourist development tax funds. 16. EVALUATION OF TOURISM IMPACT: If advertising and promotion: GRANTEE shall monitor and evaluate the tourism impact of GRANTEE's activities, explaining how the tourism impact was evaluated and shall provide a written report to the County Manager or his designee within sixty (60) days of the expiration of this Agreement. If an event: GRANTEE shall monitor and evaluate the event identifying the success or failure of the event, explaining how the success and quality were evaluated, report overall attendance including resident /non- resident attendance and how attendance information was ascertained. GRANTEE shall provide a written report to the County Administrator or his designee within sixty (60) days of the date of the event. 17. REQUIRED NOTATION: All promotional literature and media advertising must prominently list Collier County as one of the sponsors. 18. AMENDMENTS: This Agreement may only be amended by mutual agreement of the parties and after recommendation by the Tourist Development Council. 19. COOPERATION: ALLIANCE shall fully cooperate with the COUNTY in all matters pertaining to this agreement and provide all information and documents as requested by the County from time to time. Failure to cooperate, as interpreted by the COUNTY shall constitute grounds for the COUNTY to impose sanctions that do not result in termination of this agreement. 20. The COUNTY shall be the owner of and in possession of the originals of all intellectual property created or furnished pursuant to this agreement, including, but not limited to drawings, paintings, photography, film, video, and printed documents, unless specifically exempted by the COUNTY. 10H IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the GRANTEE and COUNTY have each respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above , --T : L`0I1t-i l� kRO(K, Clerk t AN S1: + #j: WITNESSES: (1) Printed/Typed Name (2) 44, Printed/Typed Name BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO Y, FLO By: JAMES AICARTER, PhD, Chairman GRANTEE TOURISM ALLIANCE OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC. By: 1112, � - -, �— / Printed/Typed Name Printed/Typed Title Approved as to form and legal sufficiency IVV4 I.-I 440 J qucAine Hubbard Robinson, Assistant County Attorney TOURISM ALLIANCE OF COLLIER COUNTY 10H AMENDED EXHIBIT "A" FISCAL YEAR 2001 Advertising: $865,000.00 Advertising includes all print, broadcast and Internet advertising, media relations, placement, and production. Amending budget to include Emergency Management Brochure:$ 22,000.00 Tourist Assistance Program Brochure $ 8,000.00 Public Relations: $180,000.00 Public Relations includes all professional public relations time, events, FAMs and expenses. Includes but not limited to Kelley, Swofford, Roy, Inc. Travel Industry Liaison: $ 40,000.00 Travel Industry liaison includes all travel related activities to trade shows, special events, professional conferences, trade convention, travel agent FAMs and travel. Includes but not limited to Four Trade Shows Distribution of Promotional Material, [fulfillment]: $160,000.00 Fulfillment includes all 800# and Internet requests for information as well as market research. Includes but not limited to Phase V — Fulfillment $ 120,000.00 Evan — Klages, Inc. $ 40,000.00 Administration: $195,000.00 Administration includes all accounting, insurance and administration professional time and expenses. Includes but not limited to Accounting: Prutos Public Relations, Inc Insurance: Miscellaneous Expenses: Tamara Lee Marketing Ellen Papa $ 38,000.00 $108,000.00 $ 12.000.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 10.000.00 10H z N W D a J H O 10H m x W g N W N O O i N ouO a+ w v i m �C N m '+ _ ° c yE C d °° �' •�C•�� L ._ Sp yj C 'L d 7 v @ O J y E _ ° C z C ++ L E 2E ai ? o E z z C •� EC 3, C O c m m C4 U CL E E L. Wv v �O m �� a a C V a •- o � _ • LL � m m �+ = p) z E i o c E C LL o m E ° a ° N .0 O pRp LL O � O O m z CL c> v v) o �> G) N C 0 O 0 w •F' ° 2 ea i C O_ d N L �+ N F C eef i+ CO C m Y AD p � C �Ld' t`v (� 9 �^ ^ a ° f°li R C O Q� >� c C N S' � N c E N � v a.. CL ~ tm •C 3 .a Y Q p CD R � d R 0. E C , o oQm V— d N CO 5 .� •p d = 02 °-� oif W) c C O LL N e- V .mot �� N R dS �� off° � g ca CM W p H �� +•' O +d. o� of F— F— m Q p i_ as!:, tL cco� �a La z N W D a J H O 10H m x W g N W N O 10 ', October 16, 2001 TO: Jane Eichhorn TDC Coordinator Greg Mihalic HUI Director FR: Kathy Prutos via email and telefax RE: Disaster Recovery Marketing funds Here is a follow -up to last Friday's (Oct. 12) letter to county manager Tom 011iff from the Board of Directors at the Tourism Alliance of Collier County requesting $500,000 for a disaster recovery marketing campaign. Also attached is a copy of my original letter to Mr. 011iff as well as a copy of the advertising proposal plan from our advertising agency. Please review ASAP and submit for inclusion on next Tuesday's (Oct. 23) Board of Collier County Commissioners agenda. This is an extremely time sensitive issue. Thank you. Television advertising (most cost effective; ability to leverage with Visit Florida for an additional $250,000; ability to accurate measure and evaluate; ability to begin quickly and if needed, stop or revise) Recommend creating a :30- second television commercial (culled from existing video library footage) to pair with Visit Florida's :30- second television commercial to run on three national cable networks and spot markets that include New York, New Jersey, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Chicago, Boston, Detroit, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Miami, West Palm Beach, Orlando and Tampa. Rationale: this is PITY, that is, per inquiry television. This type of program is cost effective and measurable, as the County will pay for only the spots where an inquiry is generated. At the $250,000 spending level, Collier County can expect 26,000 inquiries. As mentioned above, Visit Florida will match dollar for dollar whatever funds Collier County spends in co -op television. The Visit Florida campaign begins Oct. 19. As soon as we have budget approval, we'll produce spot and put on the air immediately. Internet advertising (88% of all adults traveling use the Internet for travel planning; cost is based upon number of impressions; ability to begin quickly and if needed, stop or revise) Recommend search engine submissions to top 10 search engines; banner and button advertising on Travelocity.com, and Expedia.com ( #1 and #2 travel websites); dream map advertising with Travelocity.com. Partner with FLAUSA.com. Rationale: Internet advertising is based upon impressions. Collier County would be responsible for payment based upon the number of impressions that are received — effective and reliable measurement of advertising's effectiveness. It is also a tactic that can be quickly and cost effectively implemented. 1OH Meetings & Incentive Travel (reach meeting planners that book international meetings as well as meetings located on the East Coast of the US) Recommend preparing a direct mail piece of collateral (postcard or bi -fold card using existing photography) to be distributed to the subscribers of key meeting planning publications — publications that Collier County currently advertises with to attract the meetings market. Rationale: Direct mail effectively targets the audience and is a measurable tactic. Many US businesses have decided against holding meetings outside the United States; some companies will not even leave the state. Nonetheless, they will continue to host meetings, they'll just be looking for new places. It only makes good economic sense that Collier County seek out those meeting planners and create awareness about the facilities, attractions and accommodations available in Collier County. 4. Florida Drive Market Campaign (reinforces television campaign message; ability to accurate measure and evaluate; ability to begin quickly and if needed, stop or revise) Recommend creating a :60- second radio commercial to air in the important drive markets of Miami/Ft. Lauderdale/Palm Beach and Orlando. Rationale: Radio, when used with television, broadens the reach of the television campaign by 12% (source: Simmons Market Research, 1999). For those last - minute, wait -and -see drive market travelers (who, incidentally are also our neighbors), radio is the most cost effective advertising tactic. As you can see, we have a fully integrated, cost - effective $750,000 marketing campaign to promote Collier County comprised of broadcast (television and radio) advertising, internet advertising and direct mail. It is a campaign that will use $250,000 from the state of Florida's campaign to help leverage our marketing dollars to promote Collier County. It is a campaign that will commence upon budget approval. Please advise next steps. We respectfully request that you submit this request for the Oct. 23, 2001 Board of Collier Commissioners meeting for approval. Please call me with any questions. Cordially, Kathleen G. Prutos President KGP:jlh Attachments 2 Cc: Board of Collier County Commissioners County Manager Tom 011iff Tourism Alliance Board of Directors 10H October 12, 2001 Mr. Tom 011iff Collier County Manager Via Email: Tom011iff(a�collier og v.net RE: Disaster Recovery Marketing Capability Dear Mr. 011iff: Disaster comes in many shapes. The terrorist attacks in New York and Washington could cost our county millions in lost taxes from tourist spending by the end of the year. Auer careful research and review, based upon national, state and local reports, the Tourism Alliance of Collier County's Board of Directors is requesting an immediate approval of $500,000 from the disaster recovery marketing fund for a comprehensive campaign to counter the current downturn in Collier County tourism. Although no hard numbers are available on how many tourist dollars have been lost since the Sept. I1 attacks, the Tourism Alliance is estimating a 30 percent drop in third quarter tourist development tax revenue because of the travel slowdown. The attacks have scored a direct hit on our tourist industry. Consider, • Nearly one third of the county's tourism workforce (which accounts for more than half- -57 %-- of employment in Collier County) has been laid off or felt a reduction in work hours • September's airport activity at Southwest Florida Regional Airport has dropped 40% -- historically, 45% of all passengers deplaning from RSW visit Collier County • Room night cancellations in September total more than $3 million dollars with October call volumes hovering at 50% (note: figures cited are representative of local telephone surveys, hospitality revenue reports and SWFlorida Airport Authority) The attached campaign outlines the initial phase of an extensive and intensive effort to help the recovery of the county's tourism industry. It will supplement marketing dollars already budgeted and, since the television is a cooperative advertising opportunity with the state agency's Visit Florida program, the total number of dollars dedicated to this program exceeds $750,000. The mass media campaign, designed to kick -off upon approval, includes direct mail, broadcast and Internet advertising, enhanced with special supporting efforts in public relations, research and fulfillment. These efforts are focused on the in -state and drive markets, in addition to our most critical long distance domestic markets. Television and radio flites will be conducted over two and three week periods, respectively, and were chosen for their immediate impact and measurement as well as our ability to quickly change strategy, pending changes in the marketplace and/or further attacks. Due to the time sensitivity of these efforts, the Tourism Alliance requests the county commissioners to waive the normal bidding requirements and instead allow the Alliance to obtain quotes from existing firms to provide the production and implementation of the campaign. We believe that you understand the importance and the expedience this matter requires. We look forward to your favorable response. Cordially, Kathleen G. Prutos President Attachment 1 Cc: Board of Collier County Commissioners Tourism Alliance Board of Directors Greg Mihalic, HUI Director Jane Eichhorn, TDC Coordinator * ** 2877228 OR: 2914 PG: 1868 * ** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:35PK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 COPIIS 1.00 Rein: 16A 1 CLBAK TO THB BOARD INTIROFFICI 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN This is to certify that the claim of lien in the sum of Three Hundred Seventy Seven Dollars and Twenty Six Cents ($377.26), arising out of the Order Imposing Costs /Lien dated October 2, 2001, on behalf of Collier County, Florida, and recorded in O.R. Book 2902, Pages 1864, et. seq., and O.R. Book 2902, Page 2340, et. seq., of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, against the following described real property owned by Blas Valsez and Roberto Soto, has been satisfied in full. Lots 3, 4, 5 & 6, Block E, Sabal Shores Subdivision, according to the Plat in Plat Book 3, Page 37, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; more commonly known as 3000 Areca Avenue, Naples, Florida. Folio No. 71782000001. The undersigned is authorized to and does hereby release the lien as to the whole of the above - described real property, and all other real and personal property owned by Blas Valsez and Roberto Soto, and consents to this lien being discharged of record. Dated this �3 ^ —`D day of i m i✓ , 2001. ATTT .DS T °r ROCK, Clerk By: '�i�y ` "'Che�iu►��l�k At psi s1 cjpitit* only. A P roved as to form legal sufficiency: Ellen T. Chadwell Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA James . arter, Ph.D., C airman HAPublic \Litigation \CEB CASES \Valsez & Soto \Satis of Lien - complete.doc 1 � DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 16A 3 Addendum to Lease Agreement This Addendum to Lease Agreement is made and entered into this a �j — day of October, 2001, by and between CPOC Realty, L.L.C., as Agent for Owner ( "Landlord ") and the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ( "Tenant "), and amends a certain Lease Agreement between the parties hereto for the premises located at 3050 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 145, Naples, Florida ( "Demised Premises "), as follows: 1. The Lease is hereby amended to provide that the lease dated December 15, 1998 shall terminate when the Tenant vacates the Demised Premises to immediately occupy Suite 280 at 3050 North Horseshoe Drive, which is expected to occur on or about October 31, 2001. 2. The Parties hereto acknowledge that Tenant was not required to, and did not give Landlord a security deposit for the Demised Premises. 3. In all other respects, said Lease Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum on the date indicated above. AS TO LANDLORD: DATED:/ o /zAkol L - iz q (print name) CPOC REALTY, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (Corporate Seal) TCL REA Y, INC., a Illinois corporation, as Manager By: Title: & AS TO TENANT: µctt9rtr >-r.i Da' At - T. 1JW GHT E, BROC;K, Clerk De p%y Clerk %'. ,A'ttest as to Chair�an'! 31 44twe sell* Approved as to form and 1 gal sufficiency: Thomas . Palmer, Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIAA, a political subdivision o tate of F a B, JAMES ARTER, Ph.D., Chairman 16A5" __ RESOLUTION NO. O1- 397 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN PELICAN STRAND REPLAT - 7, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE , WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on August 3, 1999 approved the plat of Pelican Strand Replat - 7 for recording; and WHEREAS, the developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended); and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17), and WHEREAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Review Department of Community Development Services has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Pelican Strand Replat - 7, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATA- -�`'.•DWIGIi'#' E 13ROCK, CLERK - Attest' t - -' to CM i r aan ' s si.gnatahe only. Approved as to form and legal suficienc Patrick G. Whit Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLO DA By: JAMES D. RTER, PHD., CHAIRMAN 16A6' RESOLUTION NO. 01- 3 9 8 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN PELICAN STRAND REPLAT -1B, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE , WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on September 23, 1997 approved the plat of Pelican Strand Replat -1B for recording; and WHEREAS, the developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended); and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17), and WHEREAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Review Department of Community Development Services has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Pelican Strand Replat -1B, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATE:: ATTEST DWIGHTZE. BROCK, CLERK Attost.'1k, -to Chs roan s sioniturt only. Approved as to form and legal ,,sufficiency Patrick G. White Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLO A By: JAMES D. TER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN 16A7 RESOLUTION NO. 01- 399 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN PELICAN STRAND REPLAT - 4, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on February 17, 1998 approved the plat of Pelican Strand Replat - 4 for recording; and WHEREAS, the developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended); and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17), and WHEREAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Review Department of Community Development Services has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Pelican Strand Replat - 4, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. ;''.TEST: 'J n, •, i�. BLOCK, CLERK — i' its: • t r ' �. - ,git4r n•l,y. Approved as to form and legal sufficiengi, K Patrick G. White Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAMES D. TER, Ph.D., CH RMAN 16A8' RESOLUTION NO. 01- 4 0 0 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN PELICAN STRAND REPLAT - 5, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on October 20, 1998 approved the plat of Pelican Strand Replat - 5 for recording; and WHEREAS, the developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended); and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17), and WHEREAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Engineering Review Department of Community Development Services has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Pelican Strand Replat - 5, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. �A -bST: v I� ;IGHT OCK, CLERK Chairman's S 100Jk r m-0 Approved as to form and legal s��ficien 04 Patrick G.' Whit6 Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA A rg g I ; 6- 2 a V. I 16A9 RESOLUTION NO. 01- 4 01 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN NORTH COLLIER INDUSTRIAL CENTER, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE , WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on March 17, 1999 approved the plat of North Collier Industrial Center for recording; and WHEREAS, the developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended); and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17), and WHEREAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in North Collier Industrial Center, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners association. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATE: ` _ ATTEST: t1' T)WJ.GHT E: BROCK, CLERK .Attast ft to Chairman's Approved as to form and legal Vciency• UJ47 Patrick G. White Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLO A By: JAMES D. OKRTER, PHD., CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Patrick G. White, Ass't. Cty. Att'y. 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 * ** 2877230 OR: 2914 PG: 1876 * ** RICORDID in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:41PK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLIRK RIC FBI 6.00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THI BOARD INTIROFFICI 4TH FLOOR IYT 7240 1 THIS SPACE FOR RECORDING AGREEMENT FOR RELEASE FROM OBLIGATION 6P.1� Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, through its Board of County Commissioners (Board or BCC) , and David G. Budd, Esquire, as authorized agent of the developers (the Developers) of the Quail II Planned Unit Development (PUD), do hereby agree to be bound by this Agreement for Release from Obligation (Release). The Board does now acknowledge the Developer's payment of $30,641.60 (Thirty thousand six hundred forty -one dollars and sixty cents) for improvements made by the South Florida Water Management District on behalf of the Developers; and furthermore, the Board does hereby agree to and does now release the Developers from any and all further obligations arising from the requirement for the Developers to provide a weir control structure on the Quail II outfall canal near Immokalee Road, as such obligations are stated in the provisions of County Ordinances 82 -68 and 83 -52, pertaining to Water Management, or the Quail II PUD 92 -41, as amended. The Board, as evidenced by its Chairman's signature below, does hereby fully and finally release the Developer from the foregoing obligations, and directs that the Board's Clerk record this Release in the Official Records of Collier County at the expense of the County. Executed on behalf of the Developers: By: to G�'�L Z d David G. Budd, Esq., Authorized Agent Authorized by the BCC and dated this %3~� day of O 1f�, 2001. DWSGI3T ._� . B OCK, Clerk s s 1 +^sr' wSir'Tr k Attest as to Chairman signature only. -proved s to form nd lega' suf iency: Patrick G. White Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORI By: Jame VX. Car r, ., S Cha' an 16Al2 WORK ORDER # WMI- FT -01 -08 Agreement for Fixed Term Land Surveying and Photogrammetric Services Dated January 25, 2000 (RFP 99 -2981) This Work Order is for professional surveying services for work known as Geographic Information System (GIS) Project: Collier County entered into a contract with WilsonMiller (WMI- FT- 01 -01) to create a blueprint for implementing an enterprise -wide GIS system for Collier County. This additional services proposal identifies GIS data layers utilized by Community Development and Environmental Services Division for development. The work is specified in the proposal dated March 30, 2001, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Work Order. In accordance with Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, Work Order # WMI- FT -01 -08 is assigned to WilsonMiller. Scope of Work: As detailed in the attached proposal and the following: Task 2.1 Address Matchable Road Network 2.2 Existing and Future Land Use 2.3 Zoning (w /atlas application) 2.4 Planned Use Developments 2.5 Miscellaneous Data Layers 2.6 Integration Support Services Schedule of Work: Complete work within 240 days from receipt of the Notice to Proceed which is accompanying this Work Order. Compensation: In accordance with Article Three of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the negotiated lump sum amount of 108,600 as provided in the attached proposal. Task 2.1 Address Matchable Road Network - $ 48,000 Task 2.2 Existing and Future Land Use - 24,800 Task 2.3 Zoning (w /atlas application) - 16,600 Task 2.4 Planned Use Developments - 2,400 Task 2.5 Miscellaneous Data Layers - 4,800 Task 2.6 Integration Support Services - 12,000 TOTAL FEE $ 108,600 113 138900 634999 Project 00000 - $108,600 Any change made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional service and charged according to Schedule "A" of the Agreement. APPROVED BY: l / 16 /11 C' f on M. Dunnuck, Interim Administrator Date mmunity Development and Environmental Services APPROVED BY: � 0 Le o I v_ 4 s V. Mudd, Deputy County Manager Date Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Assistant Cou ty Attorney (f zl�49e4- James D. OWer, Ph.D, Chairman Board of County Commissioners 16Al2 M" Date F 6� 16 oCAa i run �: ACCEPTED BY: 1141ld d/ John outwell, PSM, Senior Vice President Date \Wil6nMiller 1"'F, &uiyw l , Sg . V. lam. Type or Print Name and Title ATTEST: Gar . Danca, Secretary/Treasurer Date WilsonMiller Type or Print Name and T itle PERMIT FOR CARNIVAL EXHIBITION STATE OF FLORIDA: COUNTY OF COLLIER: 16A1.3 Permit° No. 2001-06 WHEREAS, ST. ELIZABETH SETON CATHOLIC CHURCH, has made application to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, for a permit to conduct a festival; and WHEREAS, ST. ELIZABETH SETON CATHOLIC CHURCH, has presented to the Board sufficient evidence that all criteria for the issuance of a permit to conduct a festival as set forth in Chapter 10, Article II, Amusements and Entertainments, of the Collier County Code have been satisfied and that such festival will be conducted according to lawful requirements and conditions; and NOW, THEREFORE, THIS PERMIT IS HEREBY GRANTED TO ST. ELIZABETH SETON CATHOLIC CHURCH, to conduct a festival from November 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2001, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the petitioner's application and all related documents, attached hereto and incorporated herein for the following described property: (See attached Exhibit "A ") WITNESS my hand as Chairman of said Board and Seal of said County, attested by the 4? Clerk of Courts in and for said County this �`day of6tMASLR 2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk w! VIM e- Attest et to Chair" sigeetyre only. Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: MaTjoriAl. Student Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: COLLIER COUNTY, FL RIDA: JAMES EVCARTER, PhD., CHAIRMAN .: L Exhibit "A" 16A13 Block 204 and 205, Golden Gate City, Unit 60 according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 11 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Also lot 5, Block 201, Golden Gate, Unit 6, according to plat book 5, PAges 124 to 134, inc. Public records of Collier County, Fl. 11 16A13 Official Receipt - Collier County Board of County Commissioners CDPR1103 - Official Receipt brans Number Date Post Date �Pa ent Sli Nbr 293913 10/16/2001 9:28 :31 AM 10/16/2001 604 Appl Name: ST. ELIZABETH SETON CATHOLIC CHURCH Appl Stage /Status: REVIEW STAGE NO. 1 /PENDING Address: 2760 52ND TERRACE SW NAPLES FL 34116 Proj Name: ST. ELIZABETH SETON SCHOOL ADDITION Type: TAZ:90 /97 Subdiv Nbr: 623 Project Nbr: 19992845 Payor : ST ELIZABETH SETON Fee Information Fee Code Description GL Account Amount Waived 11CIRC FAIR &CIRCUS 11313890034122000000 $275.00 L Total $275.00 Payments Payment Code Account/Check Number Amount CHECK 12114 $25.00 CHECK 12113 $250.00 Memo: Total Cash $0.00 Total Non -Cash $275.00 Total Paid $275.00 Cashier /location: GARRETT_S / 1 User: SMITH —G Collier County Board of County Commissioners Printed: 10/16/2001 9:29:12 AM CD -Plus for Windows 95 /NT 16A13 St. Elizabeth Seton Church 2760 52nd Terrace SW Naples, FL 34116 941 - 455 -3900 FAX 941 - 455 -6895 October 10, 2001 Commissioners of Collier County Board of county Commissioners PO Box 413020 Naples, FL 34101 Dear Commissioners: St. Elizabeth Seton Parish will be conducting the annual Festival to raise funds for the operation of the Church and our Elementary School in Golden Gate. The Parish Festival will take place on November 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2001. The hours will be 6:00 to 10:00 p.m. weekdays and 1:00 to 11:00 p.m. on Saturday and 1:00 to 9:00 p.m. on Sunday. The Golden Gate Fire Department, Collier County's Ambulance service, and the Sheriff's Department have all been informed as to the time and place of the Festival. Waste Management of Collier County has been contacted and will be responsible for removing the trash from the grounds, and if this fails, the Church assumes the responsibility of removing the trash. There will be portable toilets in several locations. There will be parking facilities in the lot adjacent to the church, at Winn Dixie Plaza, at K -Mart Plaza and also the Bank America parking lot. Enclosed please find a drawing designating the location of the booths, rides, and other facilities for the Festival. Sincerely``�Gp �i Rev. Joseph Spinel i,osa Pastor NOTE_: Please read reverse side Copy: Zoning Director before completing this Copy: Petitioner Petition. Copy: (4) County Manager 16A13 Original Form: 11/4/75 M_ EPATION PETITION PETITION NO. NY. ao�+ l��- D DATE:.-/ i 5,f o 1 PETITIONER'S NAME: St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic Church PETITIONER'S ADDRESS: 2760 52nd Terrace SW Golden Gate, FL 34116 TELEPHONE: 455 -3900 PROPERTY OWNER'S NAME: St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic Church PROPERTY OWNER'S ADDRESS: 2760 52nd Terrace SW Golden Gate, FL 34116 TELEPHONE: 455 -3900 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Church & School GENERAL LOCATION: 5325 28th Ave. SW CURRENT ZONING: Church CURRENT USE: Church property NATURE OF PETITION: Festival November THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THIS PETITION. (FOR EXPLANATION, SEE REVERSE SIDE.) 3.a. 3.b. 3.c. 3.d. 3.e.1) 3.e.2) 3.e.3) Comments: 3.e.4) 3.e.5) 3.e.6) 3.e.7) 3.e.8) 3.e.9) FAX 455 -68 FAX 455 -689 DATE REVIEWED by Board of County Commissioners: JARQroved Conditions of Approval: Disapproved': SIGNATURE OF COUNTY MANAGER 16A13 cerpt from Ordinance' No. 75 -11, Filed Secretary of State 3/6175 _ 3. Application and Fee for Permit. A minimum of twenty (20) days before occupying the carnival or exhibition site, an application for a permit shall be submitted to the County Administrator in four (4) copies accompanied by: a) A surety bond in the penal sum of $2,500, issued by a company authorized to issue such bonds in Florida, conditioned upon the operator complying with each provision of this Ordinance and subject to forfeiture under the terms provided in Paragraph 8 hereinbelow. b) Evidence of current public liability insurance coverage, issued by a company authorized to do business in the State of Florida, in the minimum amount of $100,000 for any one person and $300,000 for any one incident. c) A non - refundable fee of $275.00. d) A current occupational license issued by the Collier County Tax Collector, and e) Including the following information: 1) The name and headquarters address(es) of the carnival or exhibition company(ies) with a direct or indirect financial interest; name(s) and address(es) of any sponsoring organization(s), and the name and local address of the applicant representing the carnival or exhibition company(ies); 2) A description of every activity to be conducted such as but not limited to, menageries; circus and side -show performances; amusement, merry-go -round and other ride activities; food and drink dispensing facilities; booths for conduct of games of skill or chance not prohibited by State law to be open to the public for an admission or participation fee and number of persons to operate the activities; 3) Name, identification and social security number of each person accountable for the operation of each activity; 4) A description and sketch of the site showing the location of each activity proposed, the location and number of sanitary facilities; parking facilities, and provision for lighting and public water; 5) Application for Food Establishment Operating Permit from the County Health Department as required by Ordinance No. 74-45. 6) The plan for refuse, garbage, debris, and sewage disposal during and after operation of the circus or exhibition; 7) Provisions for traffic control, fire safety and security precautions; 8) The date and time each activity is to be conducted and concluded; 9) Written approval from the owner of the property authorizing the use of his premises for such carnival activity; 10) Legal description of property to be utilized. CARNIVAL PETITION APPLICATION 16A13 INDIVIDUAL BOOTH NOTIFICATION FORM FOR TEMPORARY EVENTS Name of event: St Elizabeth Seton Festival Name of booth: Person in charge of booth: Wesley Hates Types of food or beverage to be served: soda, coffee, hot Chnrrnlato fish & chips.- oriPntai_ Bar h_-111r, nninn, pi77a, -q{.oak Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E -11 requires all food to come from an approved source. All food storage, preparation and utensil cleaning for this event shall not be done in private homes. Location of advanced food preparation: atnprov fooa hnnthc and health inspected on grounds kitchen How will food be transported to event location? n/a Method of keeping food hot and/or cold at event site: . each booth contains refri erator & stove Method of cooking food at the location: stove at each booth Food must be protected from dust, insects, flies, coughs, sneezes. How will you provide this protection? Describe type of structure: each booth is screened in metal Adequate facilities and supplies shall be provided for employee handwashing. How will you provide this? each booth has a sink 16A13 Failure to comply with applicable food service requirements in accordance with Chapter 64E -11, Florida Administrative Code, ma result in enforcement action. Do you understand this completely? Yes No I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief all of the statements contained herein and on any attachments are true, correct, complete, and made in good faith. I understand that these regulations include food intended for service to the public regardless of whether there is a charge for the food. I agree to assume responsibility for this establishment and 1 certify that said business will be conducted in compliance with the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E -11. - - - Date: d / Signa�xi of applicant L6 INDIVIDUAL BOOTH NOTIFICATION FORM FOR TEMPO RY EVENTS Name of event: St Elizabeth Seton Festival Name of booth: Taffy wagon Person in charge of booth: John Tolve Types of food or beverage to be served: Soda, popcorn, cotton candy, taffy coated apples Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E -11 requires all food to come from an approved source. All food storage, preparation and utensil cleaning for this event shall not be done in private homes. Location of advanced food .preparation: n/a How will food be transported to event location? n/a Method of keeping food hot and /or cold at event site: electric stove and refrigerator Method of cooking food at the location: stove Food must be protected from dust, insects, flies, coughs, sneezes. How will you provide this protection? Describe type of structure: enclosed wagon Adequate facilities and supplies shall be provided for employee handwashing. How will you provide this? sink 16A13 Failure to comply with applicable food service requirements in accordance with Chapter 64E -11, Florida Administrative Code, may pesult in enforcement action. Do you understand this completely? Yes - z.,-'_ No I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief all of the statements contained herein and on any attachments are true, correct, complete, and made in good faith. I understand that these regulations include food intended for service to the public regardless of whether there is a charge for the food. I agree to assume responsibility for this establishment and I certify that said business will be conducted in compliance with the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E -11. 16A13 SPONSOR NOTIFICATION FORM FOR TEMPORARY EVENTS Name of event St. Elizabeth Seton Festival Address of event 2760 52nd Terrace SW, Naples. FL 34116 wee e d on to 11p.m. Date(s) of event Nov. 7-8-9-10-11 Hours of operation o �8 p . M. Sponsor of event St. Elizabeth Seton Parish Person in charge of food service Wesley sates Phone 353 -3616 Number of food and beverage booths 14 Estimated number of attenders expected at the event at one time? 5000 Number of toilets to be provided: Portable: Male ( 12 ) Female (12 ) Permanent: Male ( ) Female ( ) Method of toilet waste disposal: Waste Management /Sanitary Dept Describe method of liquid kitchen waste disposal: City water and sewer with grease trap Describe containers and method of solid waste disposal (garbage): Garbage cans with plastic liners Number of solid waste disposal containers provided: 3 -20 yard dumpsters Describe facilities and method of handwashing: running water with sink Describe facilities and method of utensil washing, rinsing and sanitizing: Commercial dishwasher Source of potable water: city water 16A13 As the sponsor of this event you are responsible to notify all food vendors of the temporary food service requirements. Failure to comp' i may subject the booths to be closed for publi health reason. Do you understand this completely? Yes No I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief all of the statements contained herein and on any attachments are true, correct, complete, and made in good faith. I understand that these regulations include food intended for service to the public regardless of whether there is a charge for the food. I agree to assume responsibility for this event and certify that said business will be conducted in compliance with the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 64E -11. /'2 nor Date: (G'a ig ure of — § on s agent 16A13 COLLIER COUNTY OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE TAX COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR • 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 • (941) 403 -2477 VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT: www.colliertax.com THIS LICENSE EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 30, LOCATION: T ; DISPLAY AT PLACE OF BUSINESS FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION ZONED: I FAILURE TO DO IS CONTRARY TO LOCAL LAWS. LEGAL FORM PROFESSIONAL REG. NO. BUSINESS PHON INDIVIDUAL I ] PARTNERSHIP [ ] ' _ T ' •� T < , _ T t ` , ?' CORPORATION I yi 1 i C L L i• J a (K _ d 1 SEATING CAPACITY i ..,': — ; r ROOM COUNT NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES T 1 A 'i i_ i` i r; ; ri 1 -I e C A< N{ i A i_ S NUMBER OF VENDING MACHINES PHONE COUNT CLASSIFICATION r f :d C 11 . r A :: d L• This document is an occupational license tax only. This is not certification that licensee is qualified. It does not permit the licensee to violate any existing regulatory or zoning laws of the state, county, or cities nor does it ' exempt the licensee from any other license or permits that may be required by law. WALK-IN 1- OCT. 31 1 NOV. 1- NOV. 30 DEC. 1 DEC, 31 1 JAN- 1 AND AFTER AMOUNT DUE BEFORE SEPTEMBER 30 OLD REPUBLI SURETY COMPANY • Yi : P 0 BOX 4663 WINTER PAR{, FL 32793 -4668 CO I I CERTIFICATE 30N0 NUMBER BCNO DESCRIPTION EFFEC',VE DATE EXPIRATION PATE FLA- 320968 CARNIVAL PERMIT 11/15/2000 11/15/2001 ST. ELIZABETH SETON FESTIVAL 2760 52ND TERRACE S.W. NAPLES, FL 33999 "Q 3 tG _. BD COMM. COLLIER CTY 3301 E. TAMIAMI TR NAPLES, FL 33962 THIS BOND CONTINUES IN FORCE TO THE ABOVE EXPIRATION DATE CONDITIONED AND PROVIDED THAT THE LOSSES OR RECOVERIES ON IT AND ANY AND ALL ENDORSEMENTS SHALL NEVER EXCEED THE PENALTY SET FORTH IN THE BOND AND WHETHER THE LOSSES OR RECOVERIES ARE WITHIN THE FIRST AND /OR SUBSEQUENT OR WITHIN ANY EXTENSION OR RENEWAL PERIOD PRESENT PAST OR FUTURE ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED SIGNED AND DATED THIS SEVENTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST, 2000 92 -3565 RIEDMAN CORPORATION P 0 BOX 2488 OLD REPUBLIC SURETY COMPANY BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 -2488 SURETY By October 5, 2001 sheriff Pon Hunfcr 16A13 Rev. Joseph Spinelli St. Elizabeth Seton Church 276052 nd Terrace SW Naples, Fl. 34116 Dear Rev. Spinelli: Collier County Sheriff's Office 3301 Tamiami Trail East Building "J" Naples, FL 34112 Telephone (AC 941) 774 -4434 We have received and are reviewing your request for security for the St. Elizabeth Seton Festival, running from November 7d' — November 11`x', 2001. Questions or concerns should be directed to me or Sergeant John Mausen, as representatives of Sheriff Don Hunter. Sincerely yours, Lt. Scott Stamets Golden Gate Substation S S /ajs cc: File Goy oEti :� 16A13 Gt TI f, GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT 4741 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34116 -6901 (941) 455 -2121 • FAX (941) 455 -7917 October 10, 2001 Reverend Joseph A. Spinelli St, Elizabeth Seton Church 276052 nd Terrace S.W. Naples, Florida 34116 Dear Father Spinelli: This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your correspondence pertaining to the St. Elizabeth Seton Catholic Church annual festival to be held on November 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2001. This department does not object to your having the festival, however, we must insist that all fire codes and safety codes be strictly adhered to. In addition, it will be necessary for all festival facilities to be inspected by a fire department inspector after they are set up and prior to their being opened to the public. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, LZ Donald R. Peterson Fire Chief DRP /pm OCT-16-2001 08:31 PM 7835492238473866 OCT-01-2001 ?M 04:46 PM WASTE MANAGEMENT 10, ..0. ON WASTE MMAGE14FNT OF COLUEN COUNTY 4U4 0014ANK AM MAP" IL04 FL 44 0611 150-2261 • 04U 64044 sr,nvlcrn A0DnFSl CITY, U4. 1p Its FAX MNTACT ft 10, 9414556895 P.02 FAX NO. 8416496644 p SERVICE AGREEMENT N(3N I-jAZAROCILA WASTW bAi.- �, I? No. 0382226 j: A-4- ruaTQMEM AOCCIUNT NO. .... ... 1. 1 REASON COOS I EmEOTIVE DATA BILLING NAM9---- BILLING ADOSESS crry,Ep—. TEL. I-- PAX EQUIPMENTISERVICE SPECIFICATIONS FvIP 011C1111 a I too No. LrA 4 *t , alit 6m_ TV mw "rull e. TrMI Lll( Ll Lim) TUAW . ..... Walh Ei MftnLh usm. •L far—.$ $ II —!! lh Tn- SPECUkIL INSTRUCTIONS A SCHEDULE OF CHARGES civs romem w: ions, r krvice Charge w Month. TEMA ExIm FS'"wil Oh;vQ*4 r T r $ hat Per yams rtrc�Ir�rne�ulllr'In . -• r1or Toa.. BILL. TD :ACCT f TAKARC EA00clat Per Ujokil- 5— r.� r EIG Ixrc,09ALrJTE Tolm Fx-r Load 91 Doevory chmTga THE U1406 R SIG NP.0 INDIVIDUAL SIGNING THIS AGNIIIIIAMENT ON SEMAUP or CUSYOUER ACKNowumua THAT HOME HAS RIAD AND Sd%GcbJkd UNCEIASTA140S THIE TF–RMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIIIIII AGREEMENt Ll�!–tl I C 0 ON SMVERSE SIDE. AND THAT HEAME HAS TMI! AUTHORITY TO SIGIN ON BEHALF WCUSTOM01. TERMS; NET 10 DAYS CONTRACTOR cllu&To� Ai4 ?0 I =ln 6.1- (DATE) — Awl) KAME(rAINT01111YIPP TIMM I 0-t4y NUvl*h'–" Rl DUNK TANK 11ASKETSAU. TOSS FESTIVAL BUILDING �-O 1 f 6r CHURCH FOQfBALl TOSS 1 SR. STRIKE ZONE jL STRIKE ZONE R JGIOUS ARTICLES O HI STRIKE DUNK TANK 11ASKETSAU. TOSS FESTIVAL BUILDING �-O 1 f 6r CHURCH A-RAMA BURGERS I SUS. C CREAM 1 et I 1 PIZZA AID 16A13 1 v` V CARRIAGE SCHOOL HOUSE FNSPLASH TEX SHIT, ORIENT SAUS. FISH/ BPR- ONION DOWN ma SHOP CHIPS B-OUE A-RAMA BURGERS I SUS. C CREAM 1 et I 1 PIZZA AID 16A13 1 v` V CARRIAGE SCHOOL HOUSE /� 193 MEMORANDUM Date: October 25, 2001 To: Norman Feder Transportation Division Administrator From: Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2001 -402 Requesting The State Of Florida To Retain US 41 In Eastern Collier County As A State Road Under The Florida Department Of Transportation Enclosed please find one (1) copy of document as referenced above (Agenda Item #16133), as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 23, 2001. Please forward to the appropriate State of Florida Officials. If you should have any questions, please call me at 774 -8411. Thank you. Enclosure 1683 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 402 RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO RETAIN US 41 IN EASTERN COLLIER COUNTY AS A STATE ROAD UNDER THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. WHEREAS, US 41 in eastern Collier County is a major thoroughfare, and the only direct east -west link to Dade County, and as such, provides Collier County the benefit of enhanced commercial and recreational transportation opportunities, increased access to properties in the eastern part of the County, and increased safety by serving as an evacuation or disaster relief route; and WHEREAS, the continued use of US 41 by the public as a highway for personal and commercial traffic is vital to the safety, economic health, and the quality of life of residents of Collier County; and WHEREAS, the transfer of US 41 from the State of Florida Department of Transportation to another agency may lead to the establishment of unwarranted speed reductions on US 41 designed to diminish the capacity of the roadway, or of restrictions on commercial truck traffic from the highway, both of which will have adverse effects upon the safety, economic well- being, and quality of life of the residents of Collier County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the Board give official notice to the State of Florida that US Highway 41 be retained as a Florida Department of Transportation State Roadway, and of the Collier County Board of Commissioner's strong opposition to any plans that might result in closing US 41 to commercial truck traffic or lowering the speed limit to an artificial limit that will discourage or hinder the use of the facility by motorists traveling between Collier and Dade Counties. This resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same thiso'13" day of 60—To 3 ER - , 2001 o.V"GH`I' -E. J�R(JQK, Clerk Qt ktt*&t-:WJJ Cha i run's sf9na�'e ,tia}.Y. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: - ,---tom Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY CONWISSIONERS COLLIER C Y, FL By: JAMES EVCARTER, Ph.D., Chairman ],6B4 , MEMORANDUM Date: October 24, 2001 To: Ernie Kerskie, Real Property Specialist Real Property Management Department From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Agreement for Sale and Purchase to acquire property for the benefit of the Wiggins Bay Drainage Basin Attached please find the original document, as referenced above, (Agenda Item #1684), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 23, 2001. After closing, kindly record all necessary documentation and return the fully executed original to Minutes and Records. If you should have any questions, please call me at 7240. Thank you. Enclosure [A 002 16B4 4 AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between JOHN J. NEVINS, as Bishop of the Diocese of Venice and his successors in office, a corporate sole, (hereinafter referred to as "Seller "), and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (hereinafter referred to as "Purchaser "). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, Seller is the owner of that certain parcel of real property (hereinafter referred to as "Property "), located in Collier County, State of Florida, and being more particularly described as follows, to wit; SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. WHEREAS, Purchaser is desirous of purchasing the Property, subject to the conditions and other agreements hereinafter set forth, and Seller is agreeable to such sale and to such conditions and agreements. WHEREAS, Purchaser is required by law to obtain two independent appraisals before purchasing real property at a value exceeding $500,000.00 . NOW, THEREFORE, and for and in consideration of the premises and the respective undertakings of the parties hereinafter set forth and the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed as follows: I. AGREEMENT 1.01 In consideration of the purchase price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, Seller shall sell to Purchaser and Purchaser shall purchase from Seller the Property, described above. II. PAYMENT OF PURCHASE PRICE 2.01 The purchase price (the "Purchase Price ") for the Property shall be supported by two independent appraisals to be performed on behalf of the Purchaser. If the average market value of the two appraisals equals or exceeds $650,000.00, Purchaser agrees to pay Seller $650,000.00 (SIX HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS, U.S. Currency) payable at time of closing. If the average market value of the two appraisals is less than $650,000.00, Purchaser may terminate the agreement. Seller acknowledges that Purchaser is bound by the requirement of Section 125.355, Florida Statutes. III. CLOSING 3.01 The Closing (THE "CLOSING DATE ", "DATE OF CLOSING ", OR "CLOSING ") of the transaction shall be held on or before one hundred twenty (120) days following execution of this Agreement by the Purchaser but not later than December 10, 2001, unless extended by mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. The Closing shall be held at the Collier County Attorney's Office, Administration Building, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida. The procedure to be followed by the parties in connection with the Closing shall be as follows: 3.011 Seller shall convey a marketable title free of any liens, encumbrances, exceptions, or qualifications. Marketable title shall be determined according to applicable title standards adopted by the Florida Bar and in accordance with law. A M11 VA% I I 16B4 1 10003 At the Closing, the Seller shall cause to be delivered to the Purchaser the items specified herein and the following documents and instruments duly executed and acknowledged, in recordable form: 3.0111 Warranty Deed in favor of Purchaser conveying title to the Property, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than: (a) The lien for current taxes and assessments. (b) Such other easements, restrictions or conditions of record. 3.0112 Mechanics Lien and Possession Affidavit. 3.0113 Combined Purchaser - Seller closing statement. 3.0114 A "non- foreign person affidavit" as required by Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code. 3.0115 A W -9 Form, "Request for Taxpayer Identification and Certification" as required by the Internal Revenue Service. 3.0116 Such instruments as may be required by the title insurance underwriter in order to insure the "gap" and to issue the policy contemplated by the title insurance commitment. 3.012 At the Closing, the Purchaser, or its assignee, shall cause to be delivered to the Seller the following: 3.0121 A negotiable instrument (County Warrant) in an amount equal to the Purchase Price. No funds shall be disbursed to Seller until the Title Company verifies that the state of the title to the Property has not changed adversely since the date of the last endorsement to the commitment, referenced in Section 4.011 thereto, and the Title Company is irrevocably committed to pay the Purchase Price to Seller and to issue the Owner's title policy to Purchaser in accordance with the commitment immediately after the recording of the deed. 3.0122 Funds payable to the Seller representing the cash payment due at Closing in accordance with Article III hereof, shall be subject to adjustment for prorations as hereinafter set forth. 3.02 Each party shall be responsible for payment of its own attorney's fees. Seller, at its sole cost and expense, shall pay at Closing all documentary stamp taxes due relating to the recording of the Warranty Deed, in accordance with Chapter 201.01, Florida Statutes, and the cost of recording any instruments necessary to clear Seller's title to the Property. The cost of the Owner's Form B Title Policy, issued pursuant to the Commitment provided for in Section 4.011 below, shall be paid by Seller. The cost of the title commitment shall be paid by Seller. 3.03 Purchaser shall pay for the cost of recording the Warranty Deed. Real Property taxes shall be prorated based on the current year's tax with due allowance made for maximum allowable discount, homestead and any other applicable exemptions and paid by Seller. If Closing occurs at a date which the current year's millage is not fixed, taxes will be prorated based upon such prior year's millage. IV. REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS 4.01 Upon execution of this Agreement by both parties or at such other time as specified within this Article, Purchaser and/or Seller, as the case may be, shall perform the following within the times stated, which shall be conditions precedent to the Closing; 4.011 Within fifteen (15) days after the date hereof, Seller shall furnish to Purchaser as evidence of title an ALTA Commitment for an Owner's Title Insurance Policy (ALTA Form B -1970) covering the Property, issued by a national title insurance company, together with hard copies of all exceptions shown thereon. Purchaser shall have fifteen (15) days, following receipt of the title 1684 J insurance commitment, to notify Seller in writing of any objection to title other than liens evidencing monetary obligations, if any, which obligations shall be paid at closing. Permitted exceptions shall include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) applicable zoning regulations and ordinances of the county having jurisdiction over the use of the Property; and (2) real property taxes and assessments for 2001, which are not yet due and payable. (3) existing mortgages which shall be satisfied at or prior to Closing. 4.012 If Purchaser shall fail to advise the Seller in writing of any such objections in Seller's title in the manner herein required by this Agreement, the title shall be deemed acceptable. Upon notification of Purchaser's objection to title, Seller shall have thirty (30) days to remedy any defects in order to convey good and marketable title, except for liens or monetary obligations which will be satisfied at Closing. Seller, at its sole expense, shall use its best efforts to make such title good and marketable. In the event Seller is unable to cure said objections within said time period, Purchaser, by providing written notice to Seller within two (2) days after expiration of said thirty (30) day period, may accept title as it then is, waiving any objection; or Purchaser may terminate the Agreement. A failure by Purchaser to give such written notice of termination within the time period provided herein shall be deemed an election by Purchaser to accept the exceptions to title as shown in the title commitment. 4.013 Purchaser shall have the option, at its own expense, to obtain a current survey of the Property prepared by a surveyor licensed by the State of Florida. No adjustments to the Purchase Price shall be made based upon any change to the total acreage as referenced in the aforementioned legal description, if any. Seller agrees to furnish any existing surveys of the Property, if any, to Purchaser within thirty (30) days of execution of this Agreement. V. APPRAISAL PERIOD 5.01 Purchaser shall have sixty (60) days from the date of this Agreement (Appraisal Period), to obtain two (2) independent appraisals in order to determine the value of the Property pursuant to the requirements of Florida Statutes 125.355. Seller expressly acknowledges and agrees that Purchaser shall not be obligated to purchase the Property in the event the proposed purchase price in Section 2.01 exceeds the average appraised value of two appraisals. 5.02 If Purchaser is not satisfied, for any reason whatsoever, with the results of the independent appraisal, Purchaser shall deliver to the Seller prior to the expiration of the Appraisal Period, written notice of its intention to waive the applicable contingencies or to terminate this Agreement. If Purchaser fails to notify the Seller in writing of its specific objections as provided herein within the Appraisal Period, it shall be deemed that the Purchaser is satisfied with the results of its investigation and the contingencies of this Article V shall be deemed waived. In the event Purchaser elects to terminate this Agreement copies of the appraisal report may be requested by Seller and shall be provided in accordance with Section 125.355, Florida Statutes. VI. INSPECTION PERIOD 6.01 Purchaser shall have ninety (90) days from the date of this Agreement, ( "Inspection Period "), to determine through appropriate investigation that: 1. Soil tests and engineering studies indicate that the Property can be developed without any abnormal demucking, soil stabilization or foundations. 2. There are no abnormal drainage or environmental requirements to the development of the Property. 3. The Property is in compliance with all applicable State and Federal environmental laws and the Property is free from any pollution or contamination. 6.02 If Purchaser Is not satisfied, for any reason whatsoever, with the results of any investigation, Purchaser shall deliver to Seller prior to the expiration of the Inspection 16B4' Period, written notice of its intention to waive the applicable contingencies or to terminate this Agreement. If Purchaser fails to notify the Seller in writing of its specific objections as provided herein within the Inspection Period, it shall be deemed that the Purchaser is satisfied with the results of its investigations and the contingencies of this Article VI shall be deerned waived. 6.03 Purchaser and its agents, employees and servants shall, at their own risk and expense, have the right to go upon the Property for the purpose of surveying and conducting site analyses, soil borings and all other necessary investigation. Purchaser shall, in performing such tests, use due care and shall indemnify Seller on account of any loss or darnages occasioned thereby and against any claim made against Seller as a result of Purchaser's entry. Seller shall be notified by Purchaser no less than twenty four (24) hours prior to said inspection of the Property. VII. INSPECTION 7.01 Seller acknowledges that the Purchaser, or its authorized agents, shall have the right to inspect the Property at any time prior to the Closing. VIII. POSSESSION 8.01 Purchaser shall be entitled to full possession of the Property at Closing. IX. PROBATIONS 9.01 Ad valorem taxes next due and payable, after closing on the Property, shall be prorated at Closing based upon the gross amount of 2001 taxes, and shall be paid by Seller. X. TERMINATION AND REMEDIES 10.01 If Seller shall have failed to perform any of the covenants and /or agreements contained herein which are to be performed by Seller, within ton (10) days of written notification of such failure, Purchaser may, at its option, terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of termination to Seller. Purchaser shall [lave the right to seek and enforce all rights and remedies availablo at law or in equity to a contract vendee, including the right to seek specific performance of this Agreement. 10.02 If the Purchaser has not terminated this Agreement pursuant to any of file provisions authorizing such termination, and Purchaser fails to close the transaction contemplated hereby or otherwise fails to perform any of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Agreement as required on the part of Purchaser to be performed, provided Seller is not in default, then as Seller's sole remedy, Seller shall Dave the right to terminate and cancel this Agreement by giving written notice thereof to Purchaser, whereupon one percent (1 %) of the purchase price shall be paid to Seller as liquidated damages which shall be Seller's sole and exclusive remedy, and neither party shall have any further liability or obligation to the other except as set forth in paragraph 13.01 hereof. The parties acknowledge and agree that Seller's actual damages in the event of Purchaser's default are uncertain in amount and difficult to ascertain, and that said amount of liquidated damages was reasonably determined by mutual agreement between the parties, and said sum was not intended to be a penalty in nature. 10.03 The parties acknowledge that (lie remedies described herein and in the other provisions of this Agreement provide mutually satisfactory and sufficient remedies to each of the parties, and take into account the peculiar risks and expenses of each of the parties. XI. SELLER'S AND PURCHASER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES 11.01 Seller and Purchaser represent and warrant the following: 011/21 /2UOI FRI 17:44 FAA 11417748876 REAL 1'IM111114,11 � 4 Id.1UQIi 11.011 Seller and Purchaser have full right and authority to enter into and to execute this Agreement and to undertake all actions and to perform all tasks required of each hereunder. Seller is not presently the subject of a pending, threatened or contemplated bankruptcy proceeding. 11.012 Seller has full right, power, and authority to own and operate the Property, and to execute, deliver, and perform its obligations under this Agreement and the instruments executed in connection herewith, and to consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. All necessary authorizations and approvals have been obtained authorizing Seller and Purchaser to execute and consummate the transaction contemplated hereby. At Closing, certified copies of such approvals and authorizations shall be delivered to Purchaser and /or Seller, if necessary. 11.013 The warranties set forth in this paragraph shall be true on the date of this Agreement and as of the date of Closing. Purchaser's acceptance of a deed to the said Property shall not be deemed to be full performance and discharge of every agreement and obligation on the part of the Seller to be performed pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 11.014 Seller represents that it has no knowledge of any actions, suits, claims, proceedings, litigation or investigations pending or threatened against Seller, at law, equity or in arbitration before or by any federal, state, municipal or other governmental instrumentality that relate to this agreement or any other property that could, if continued, adversely affect Seller's ability to sell the Property to Purchaser according to the terms of this Agreement. 11.015 No party or person other than Purchaser has any right or option to acquire the Property or any portion thereof. 11.016 Until the date fixed for Closing, so long as this Agreement remains in force and effect, Seller shall not encumber or convey any portion of the Property or any rights therein, nor enter into any agreements granting any person or entity any rights with respect to the Property or any part thereof, without first obtaining the written consent of Purchaser to such conveyance, encumbrance, or agreement which consent may be withheld by Purchaser for any reason whatsoever. 11.017 That the Seller or any acquaintances of the Seller has not placed any toxic or hazardous wastes on the subject property, and that to the best of the Seller's knowledge and belief, there are no toxic or hazardous wastes located on same which might have been placed there by others or prior owners. 11.018 Seller has no knowledge that the Property and Seller's operations concerning the Property are in violation of any applicable Federal, State or local statute, law or regulation, or of any notice from any governmental body has been served upon Seller claiming any violation of any law, ordinance, code or regulation or requiring or calling attention to the need for any work, repairs, construction, alterations or installation on or in connection with the Property in order to comply with any laws, ordinances, codes or regulation with which Seller has not complied. 11.019 There are no unrecorded restrictions, easements or rights of way (other than existing zoning regulations) that restrict or affect the use of the Property, and there are no maintenance, construction, advertising, management, leasing, employment, service or other contracts affecting the Property. ..... , _ WJUU7 16B4 11.020 Seller has no knowledge that there are any suits, actions or arbitration, bond issuances or proposals therefor, proposals for public improvement assessments, pay -back agreements, paving agreements, road expansion or improvement agreements, utility moratoriums, use moratoriums, improvement moratoriums, administrative or other proceedings or governmental investigations or requirements, formal or informal, existing or pending or threatened which affects the Property or which adversely affects Seller's ability to perform hereunder; nor is there any other charge or expense upon or related to the Property which has not been disclosed to Purchaser in writing prior to the effective date of this Agreement. 11.021 Seller acknowledges and agrees that Purchaser is entering into this Agreement based upon Seller's representations stated above and on the understanding that Seller will not cause the zoning or physical condition of the Property to change from its existing state on the effective date of this Agreement up to and including the Date of Closing. Therefore, Seller agrees not to enter into any contracts or agreements pertaining to or affecting the Property and not to do any act or omit to perform any act which would change the zoning or physical condition of the Property or the governmental ordinances or laws governing same. Seller also agrees to notify Purchaser promptly of any change in the facts contained in the foregoing representations and of any notice or proposed change in the zoning, or any other action or notice, that may be proposed or promulgated by any third parties or any governmental authorities having jurisdiction of the development of the property which may restrict or change any other condition of the Property. 11.022 At the Closing, Seller shall deliver to Purchaser a statement (hereinafter called the "Closing Representative Statement ") reasserting the foregoing representations as of the Date of Closing, which provisions shall survive the Closing. 11.023 Seller represents, warrants and agrees to indemnify, reimburse, defend and hold Purchaser harmless from any and all costs (including attorney's fees) asserted against, imposed on or incurred by Purchaser, directly or indirectly, pursuant to or in connection with the application of any federal, state, local or common law relating to pollution or protection of the environment which shall be in accordance with, but not limited to, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. Section 9601, et seq., ( "CERCLA" or "Superfund "), which was amended and upgraded by the Superfund Amendment and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ( "SARA "), including any amendments or successor in function to these acts. This provision and the rights of Purchaser, hereunder, shall survive Closing and are not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 11.024 Any loss and/or damage to the Property between the date of this Agreement and the date of Closing shall be Seller's sole risk and expense. XII. NOTICES 12.01 Any notice, request, demand, instruction or other communication to be given to either party hereunder shall be in writing, sent by registered, or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: If to Purchaser: Real Property Management Department Administration Building, 4 "" Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 With a copy to: Ellen T. Chadwell, Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney Administration Building, 81" Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 If to Seller: Bishop John J. Nevins Diocese of Venice 1000 Pinebrook Road Venice, Florida 34292 -1426 With a copy to: Stephen W. Buckley Coldstein,Buckley,Ctieckman Rice and Purtz 1515 Broadway Ft. Myers,Fl. 33901 L,VJuvo 7 12.02 The addressees and addresses for the purpose of this Article may be changed by either party by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided herein. For the purpose of changing such addresses or addressees only, unless and until such written notice is received, the last addressee and respective address stated herein shall be deemed to continue in effect for all purposes. XIII. REAL ESTATE BROKERS 13.01 Any and all brokerage commissions or fees payable to Florida Southern Investment Corp. shall be the sole responsibility of the Seller. Seller shall indemnify Purchaser and hold Purchaser harmless from and against any claim or liability for commission or fees to any broker or any other person or party claiming to have been engaged by Seller as a real estate broker, salesman or representative, in connection with this Agreement. Seller agrees to pay any and all commissions or fees at closing pursuant to the terms of a separate agreement, if any. IX. MISCELLANEOUS 14.01 This Agreement may be executed in any manner of counterparts which together shall constitute the agreement of the parties. 14.02 This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shall be effective as of the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors, successor trustee, and assignees whenever the context so requires or admits. 14.03 Any amendment to this Agreement shall not bind any of the parties hereof unless such amendment is in writing and executed and dated by Purchaser and Seller. Any amendment to this Agreement shall be binding upon Purchaser and Seller as soon as it has been executed by both parties. 14.04 Captions and section headings contained in this Agreement are for convenience and reference only; in no way do they define, describe, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any provisions hereof. 14.05 All terms and words used in this Agreement, regardless of the number and gender in which used, shall be deemed to include any other gender or number as the context or the use thereof may require. 14.06 No waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless it is in writing signed by the party against whom it is asserted, and any waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be applicable only to the specific instance to which it is related and shall not be deemed to be a continuing or future waiver as to such provision or a waiver as to any other provision. 14.07 If any date specified in this Agreement falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, then the date to which such reference is made shall be extended to the next succeeding business day. 14.08 Seller is aware of and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. 14.09 If the Seller holds the Property in the form of a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Seller shall make a written public disclosure, according to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, under oath, of the name and address of every person having a beneficial interest in the Property before Property held in such capacity is conveyed to Collier County. (If the corporation is registered with the Federal Securities Exchange Commission or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose stock is for sale to the general public, it is hereby exempt from the provisions of Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.) ­11.. ­­­ - 1. 1 b 8, 4 WJ$JU" 14.10 This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. XV. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 15.01 This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto contain the entire agreement between the parties, and no promise, representation, warranty or covenant not included in this Agreement or any such referenced agreements has been or is being relied upon by either party. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless made in writing and executed and dated by both Purchaser and Seller. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set forth their hands seals. Dated Project/Acquisition Approved by BCC: AS TO PURCHASER: DATED: /Q-6L3-,0/ 111rICl-iT E:'BCK, Clerk *3t a IF geputY Clerk AS-TO SELLER: DATED: WITNESSES: FIRST WITNESS ('Signature) (eft l /f�.E� �tiG /Z o', _­% c r, 5. ,.? ' ( 'nt Name SECON)q WITNESS (Signature) (Print "Name) Approved as to form and leg I sufficiency: Ellen T. Chadweif Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORI A BY: JAMES ARTER, Ph.D., Chairman JOHN J. NEVINS, as Bishop of the Diocese of Venice and his successors in office, a corporate sole OOHN J. NEVINS JEROME A. CAROSELLA Attorney in Fact ........ ............ - - - - l[/.jUIU 1684 i PROJECT: Wiggins Pass Road Outfall PARCEL: Diocese FOLIO: 00155800003 EXHIBIT "A" A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 16, RUN SOUTH 00 036'47" EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 30.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE OF WIGGINS PASS ROAD; THENCE NORTH 88 °07'04" EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE 233.45 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00 036'47" EAST 294.65 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 60 017'58" EAST 277.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 52 006'25" EAST 82.41 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 024'24" EAST 45.81 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 001'17" EAST 183.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54 001'37" EAST 53.58 FEET; THENCE NORTH 8103349" EAST 56.33 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 033'41" WEST 38.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 60 014'47" EAST 42.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 81028'33" EAST 53.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 30 000'19" EAST 57.10 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 67 032'19" EAST 162.03 FEET; THENCE NORTH 75 015'34" EAST 93.66 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55 021'21" EAST 89.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 49 039'10" EAST 61.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64 036'34" EAST 59.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 042'06" EAST 128.81 FEET TO AN IRON PIN ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF THOSE LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 922, PAGE 1501 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 00 °43'41" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE 12.48 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SUNNY TRAIL HEIGHTS, A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 0041'50" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 676.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF WIGGINS PASS ROAD; THENCE SOUTH 88 007'04" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE 1140.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. _ ITEM NO.: 1685 DATE _. RECEIVED: � � �� I�` FILE NO.. o l % — C) � � ROUTED TO: ?1 0 F 0 IE C 17 Alfif 8 DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES Date: To: Office of the County Attorney Attention: Robert Zachary From: Tara L. McGraw, Contract Agent4 Purchasing Department, Extension 8990 Administrative Services Division Re: Contract No. 01 -3280 "Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights" >E.B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc., one of 3 Contractors awarded BACKGROUND OF REQUEST: This Contract was approved by the BCC on October 23, 2001; Agenda Item 16(B)(5). This item has not been previously submitted. ACTION REQUESTED: Review for legal sufficiency. OTHER COMMENTS: Robert, this is a standard contract (the 5- pager) with an attachment implementing standardized pricing. Please forward to BCC for signature after approval. Would you also please notify me when the documents leave your office? Thank you! If there are any questions concerning the document, please contact me. C c cc: Bob Tipton, Transportation Operations 1685 4- AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of this 1St day of December 2001, by and between E.B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc., hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County ": WITNESSETH: 1. COMMENCEMENT. The Contractor shall commence the work immediately after receiving a Notice to Proceed, in the form of a numbered and approved Purchase Order. The Agreement shall be for a period ending on September 30, 2003. The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, extend the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for two (2) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide labor, equipment and materials on an as- needed basis for installation, upgrades, emergency repairs and routine maintenance of highway lighting systems in Collier County, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein and in the specifications of RFP #01 -3280 and the Contractor's proposal, each of which are incorporated by reference herein. 3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price, as specified in Attachment 1 to this Agreement. 4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the Contractor at the following Address: E. B. Simmonds, President E.B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. 4406 Exchange Avenue, Suite 105 Naples, FL 34104 6" 0 1685 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department - General Services Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 The Contractor and the County may change the above l mails g d dr ss at any time upon giving the other party written notification. Al must be in writing. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall or to constitute the Contractor creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor an agent of the County. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section by nthe Contractor. l Payment necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtain by the County. for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed inornalshall be procured All non - County permits necessary Tlie Coprosecution ctor shall alsoebe solely responsible for and paid for by the Contractor. payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition State of Florida, shall the comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the to comply U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor eapectsto persons with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer employed by the Contractor. 7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor m fro improper, permit any person to al or offensive use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities foray p p or for any purpose in violation of any federal, ltrule or re lationu now in purpose, ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any vent of such effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event 1 deem vany la conduct on the part of t if the County or its authorized onable ore improper, the County shall have the right to the Contractor to be obi orrect any such suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should ofethe County within ctwenty -four (24) violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, snot to spommento continue until the violation riod until the violation has been corrected to the operation during the suspension P satisfaction of the County. 1685 -1 -04 S. TERMINATION. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may terminate said Agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written -notice. The County shall be sole judge of non - performance. 9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non -Owned Vehicles and Employee Non - Ownership. C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees, meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $1,000,000 for each accident. Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County 30 days prior to any expiration date. There shall be a 30 day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. Contractor shall insure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor /Vendor, in consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall hold harmless and defend Collier County and its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorneys' fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by any employee of the named Contractor/ Vendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Contractor/ Vendor's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the Contractor/ Vendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first One Hundred dollars ($100.00) of money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Traffic Operations Section, Public Works Division. 13. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Attachment 1, Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, and RFP #01 -3280 Specifications. Attachment 1 pre -empts and replaces all pricing and other compensation arrangements set forth in any of the other listed documents. Attachment 1 sets forth all compensation or reimbursement to which Contractor is entitled under this Agreement. (continued to next page) 1685 .-A" 14. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF; the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. l : Brr, •e k of Courts / i J � First Witness Lyne B. S immond s TType/ print witness nameT Approved as to form and le al s c Robert Zachqxy, Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLO IDA By. Chairman E.B. SIMMONDS ELECTRICAL, INC. Los E. B. Simmonds / President Typed signature and title CORPORATE SEAL (corporations only) 16B5 ATTACHMENT NO.1 TO AGREEMENT DATED AS OF DECEMBER 1, 2001 FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF STREET LIGHTS BASIS OF COMPENSATION CONTRACT #01 -3280 Compensation to the Contractor under the Agreement is set forth in this Attachment. Materials, including but not limited to those shown in the chart in Subsection II.A. below, are to be provided as "Furnish Only ", except where noted in the chart as "F &I" (Furnish and Install). In each case, provision of the materials is to be per the Florida Department of Transportations Basis of Estimates Manual. Materials paid as "F &I" implicitly include labor. Labor may be charged separately for installation of materials paid as "Furnish Only ", and will be compensated at the appropriate hourly rate set forth below. The Contractor is to be available twenty -four (24) hours per day, three hundred sixty -five (365) days per year. Travel time to and from the job site is not chargeable. I. HOURLY RATES A. Labor (Normal working hours 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.) $ 32.00 per man hour B. Overtime Labor (Emergency overtime rate for hours other than normal "Working Day ". Work must be pre- approved by the Traffic Operations Manager or his designee) $ 47.00 per man hour C. Heavy Equipment Bucket Truck, Line Truck, Auger, Back Hoe, Etc. $ 35.00 per unit hour Cranes: 35 Ton 12-1/2 Ton $ 95.00 per unit hour $ 80.00 per unit hour Rock Auger (Pressure Digger) $ 130.00 per unit hour D. Minor Equipment Cement Saw, Arrow Board, Air Compressor, Jack Hammer, etc. E. Vehicles Passenger Vehicle or pickup truck. II. MATERIALS A 1685 N" $ 7.00 per unit hour $ 10.00 per unit hour PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST 339 -1 Misc. Asphalt ( As required by job) TN $150.00 400 -1 -15 Misc. Class 1 Concrete (As required by job) Cy $250.00 575 -1 -1 (F & 1) Sod, Bahia (As required by job) SY $6.00 575 -1 -4 (F & n Sod, St. Augustine (As required by job) SY $10.00 620 -1 -1 (F & n Grounding Electrode LF $4.00 630 -1 -11 (F & n Conduit – Aboveground LF $3.00 635 -1 -11 (F & 1) Pull Box EA $235.00 639 -1 -12 Overhead Electrical Service Assembly AS $150.00 639 -1 -22 Underground Electrical Service Assembly AS $250.00 639 -2 -2 Electrical Service Wire LF $1.10 715 -11 -111 Luminaire (Roadway, Cobrahead) EA $218.00 715 -11 -113 Luminaire ( Pole -Top) EA $500.00 715 -1 -211 Conductors #10 LF $0.24 715 -1 -212 Conductors #8 LF $0.28 715 -1 -213 Conductors #6 LF $0.38 715 -1 -214 Conductors #4 'LF $0.45 715 -1 -215 Conductors #2 LF $0.80 715 -14 -21 Pull Box (Moulded, Highway Lighting) EA $135.00 715 -19 -1 Surge Protector (Pole Base 480V) EA $48.00 715 -21 -1 Luminaire Starter Board (Igniter) EA $42.00 715 -2 -115 (F & 1) PVC Conduit Underground* LF $6.00 715 -2 -215 (F & I) PVC Conduit Under Pavement* LF $13.00 715 -2 -415 (F & 1) PVC Conduit Jack & Bore* LF $24.00 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Lighting Pole (45') EA $2,100.00 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Lighting Pole (50') EA $2,300.00 715 -35 -2 Mast Arm Only (Roadway Lighting —to 15') EA $565.00 715 -36 -22 Frangible Transformer Base EA $298.00 715 -36 -24 Frangible Door Assembly EA $69.00 715 -500 -1 Pole Cable Distribution System JEA 1 $1,035.001 1685 No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly ONLY (Cobrahead representative of General Electric, Hubble, or Cooper) EA $159.00 No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly ONLY (Pole -top representative of General Electric, Hubble, or Cooper) EA $134.00 No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect (30 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R) EA $159.00 No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect (60 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R) EA $179.00 No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect (100 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R) EA $240.00 No FDOT -BEM # Single Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE) EA $98.00 No FDOT -BEM # Double Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE) EA $165.00 No FDOT -BEM # Triple Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE) EA $300.00 No FDOT -BEM # Dummy Fuse EA $11.00 No FDOT -BEM # Fuse for pole base (10 Amp, 600 V) EA $11.00 No FDOT -BEM # Fuse Holder (in -line, weatherproof, 600V) EA $25.00 No FDOT -BEM # Lamp (BPS, 250 W) EA $30.00 No FDOT -BEM # Lamp (BPS, 400 W) EA $30.00 No FDOT -BEM # Lighting Contactor (3 -pole, 30 Amp, 600V, varying coil voltage) EA $249.00 No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse (30 Amp) EA $16.00 No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse (60 Amp) EA $16.00 No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse (100 Amp) EA $23.00 No FDOT -BEM # Main Breaker Panel Board (100 Amp, 480V, 3 -phase, 30 Circuit, NEMA 3R) EA $600.00 No FDOT -BEM # Photocell (Twist Lock or Hub Style) EA $25.00 No FDOT -BEM # Photocell Control Transformer (500VA 480/240 -120V) EA $75.00 *Underground, Under Pavement, and Jack & Bore Conduit may be installed by the use of directional bore equipment at the contractor's discretion at the same rate as bid. B. Material Markup (Cost plus - 15 %) Any material item that is not covered as a pay item in Subsection A above will be chargeable under Material Markup. 1585 .; Legend to Attachment No.1 to Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights Contract dated as of December 1, 2001 Page 4 of this 4 -page Attachment EA = each AS = per assembly LF = linear foot Cy = cubic yard SY = square yard TN = per ton Client 36762 1 DATE (MMIDDIYY) A� CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE A MATTER OF NFORMAOTON THIS CERTIFICATE PRODUCER ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE Gulfshore Insurance, Inc. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR A N #1 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 4100 Goodlette Roa 1 -1 6 W Naples, FL 34103 -3303 941 261 -3646 INSURED E. B. Simmonds Electri #105 Inc. 4406 Exchange Avenue, (Naples, FL 34104 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE a INSURERA:Cincinnati Insurance Company INSURER B:Bridgef field Employers Insurance INSURER C: INSURER D: LNSURER E: ,OVERAGES ED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHERNDOCUMENTMWITH RESPECT TO WHICH THISICERTNICA ND MAY BE ISSUED OF ANY REQUIREMENT, MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAIBD CLAIMS. IN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, IXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICYEXPIRATIO LIMITS VSR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER EACH OCCURRENCE $1 000 O O O 02/01/01 02/01/02 A I GENERAL LIABILITY CPP 0 71 9 8 81 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $100-000 X COMMERCIALGENERALLIABILITY ME D EXP (Any one person) $5, 000 CLAIMS MADE OCCUR PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $1 000,000 ` IjGENERALAGGREGATE $no limit PRODUCTS -COMPIOP AG6 $2 , 0 0 0, 0 0 0 r AGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRO- LOC LIABILITY CPP0719881 O NED AUTOS ULED AUTOS AUTOS WNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO A EXCESS LIABILITY X OCCUR 1:1 CLAIMS DEDUCTIBLE X RETENTION $0 B WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY 1 OTHER CCC4473167 83015343 I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSIVEHICLESrEXCL Electrical Contractor Certificate Holder is Named General Liability Only. Collier County Bid #01 -3280 O2 /O1 /O1 02/01/02 1 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $500,000 1 (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY $ (Per person) BODILY INJURY $ (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) _AUTO ONLY- EA ACCIDENT $ OTHERTHAN EA ACC 9 AUTO ONLY: AGG 1 02/01/01 02/01/02 EACH 04/01/01 04/01/02 E.L. PENCE $1 000 O O O $1 000 000 $100, 000 EAEMPLOYEE $100 000 -POLICYLIMI s500,000 JSIONSADDIED BY ENDORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS *30 Days for Workers' Compensation as Additional Insured As Respects to: Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 ACORD25- S(7197)1 of 2 #S188564/M183759 CANCELLATION SHOULDANYOFTHEABOVEDESCRIBEDPOUCIESBECANOELLEDBE *ORE DEAYRN DATETHEREOF, THEISSUINGINSURERWILLENDEAVORTOMAIL_ .4 5_ NOTICETOTHE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TOTHE LEFT, BUTFAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO O"ATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE I NSURER,ITS AGENTS OF P VTP @ ACORD CORPORATION 19 1685 IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(iss) must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD25- S(7197)2 of 2 #S188564/M183759 1685 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNM EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL PURCHASING DEPARTMENT_ PURCHASING BUILDING SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 732-2667 FAX (941) 732-0844 http : Il co. collier.fl. us DATE: August 17, 2001 TO: Prospective Proposers FROM: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M. Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: RFP #01 -3280 — Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights Pursuant to County Manager action, the Transportation Operations Department is seeking the services of a qualified firm capable Legal installation conta ned 9 maintenance of street light sery ices. Please refer to the g in the enclosed Proposal Package for the time and the due date for proposal submission. These professional services will include, but not be limited to the "Scope of Services" as described herein. If Y ou have any immediate questions regarding the intended Scope of neOpera�tiyou may contact Bob Tipton, Traffic Operations Manager, Department, at 9411774 -8260. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 732 -2667 ore mail r ynwo0aC N) Q11ier$ov.net. We look forward to your participation in this RFP process. cc: Bob Tipton, Transportation Operations I tit ' Page ' RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation &Maintenance of Street Lights P e216B5 PUBLIC NOTICE OR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Pursuant to action approved by the County Manager, Sealed Proposals for Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights will be received until 3:00 p.m. on September 14, 2001 at the Purchasing Department, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Purchasing Building, Naples, Florida 34112. RFP #01 -3280 "Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights" All proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the Instructions to Proposers and the Request for Proposal Specifications. Collier County does not discriminate based on age, race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability or marital status. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: /S/ STEVE CARNELL Purchasing Director This Public Notice was posted in the lobby of the General Services Building, Collier County Government Center on August 17, 2001. 4 RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance intence of Street Lights Page 3 16B5 SCOPE OF SERVICES equipment, and materials to assist the Collier County The work consists of providing labor, s- upgrades, emergency Traffic Operations Department, on an as- needed basis, stems throulghout Coer County. repairs, and routine maintenance of highway lighting Y replacing ine The work will include providing labor and equipment es and /or foutndat otnsQ and newpinstal {ations of underground wiring, replacing Street Light p underground wiring, foundations, and Street Lights orcomplete de Contractor shall have a repairs, g 20 working days to c P maximum of twenty ( ) including replacement of downed street light P Id t The nstallr actnew street light A written sixty (60) days to complete the work require notification shall be provided to the County requesting ob. Should the'County determine that unforeseen circumstances hindering the completion hours to secure a situation is an emergency, the Contractor shall have a maximum of two (2) the area to a safe condition until permanent repairs can be accomplished. Miscellaneous Materials and Services Minor materials and services necessary to complete the contract services as defined above shall be provided by the Contractor. The County reserves the right to furnish any and all of the above minor materials and services should s �s at this timee Note: e AllCounty's tems shall be bid per however, it is not our intention to furnish materials re Florida Department of Transportation "Basis of Estima ae an wall furnish 'FUR ISH"ial exept items and rioted as "FURNISH and INSTALL (F & I). installation will be priced per hour unless indicated as "F & I ". Any material item that is NOT covered as a pay item will fall under Material Markup. Contractors Re uirementslRes onsibilities practices during all A. The contractor shall be responsible for s f personnel trained and certified to a minimum e fuse A phases of project work. Contractor will pr p of MOT. Contractor will assure t of Safety in the Work Zone certification to oversee set -up rounds for an order T safety ves , is traffic cones, and arrow boards at all work locations. will g anon of unsafe MO practices by County Transportation or Risk Management per cease work. Continued unsafe MOT practices will be grounds for voiding this contract. B. The contractor shall be capable of providing field engineering and technical assistance as may be needed within the contract period. All work performed by the contractor shall be in accodacCow�structiod (2000 Edition) na d C P R Transportation dway Traffic Design Standard d IndexR(2000 Edition). Bridge Roadway a e to accordance with F. D. O. T. Standard Specifications Traffic Operations Department with copies o insuran D. The contractor shall provide the Tr be in effect during the contract period in 7 -13.1 and 7- 13.2.2 RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 4 16B5 As a matter of public safety and liability, emergency service response time shall be adhered E. i E. strictly to maintain vel of County liability. Failure by the Contractor to provide minimal le . expedient response as outlined in scope of work shall constitute contractual default. F. The County reserves the right to undertake is any-work the best interest of he County.ns by County employees or by other contracts if such G. The Contractor may be required to perform w {ork0apnrr9hWeedlCdays weeke collectors oe closure prohibitions during the hours of 6 arterials. Contract Period This contract shall be in effect for a period of two (2) years, commencing with the issuance of a uis cont order, and ending September 30, 2003. The prices quoted on the proposal shall P remain in effect for the term of the contract. Contract Renewal The County, at its discretion, and with the consent of the contracted vendor, shall have the e terms and conditions for two (2) additional one option to renew this Agreement under the sam (1) year periods. Contract Termination Should the Contractor be found to have failed Fp he services in a terminate manner satisfactory Agreement to the County per the requirements of this R , ma terminate this Agreement for convenience with a immediately for cause; further the County Y seven (7) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non - performance. Estimated Amount of Work by The estimated amount of this contract for F`( 01/02to $275,000-00. h s services ems/ery ces described in required not be limited the this contract shall include but as to Specifications. The County shall order items /se ms/ ervices that d will be ordered guarantee ued by the quantity, number, type or distribution of ite this contract. Special Note The City of Naples and the Collier County School Di sort strict andgmay,hif they so desire, have entered into a co- operative buying purchase this service under the terms and conditions o of his cont dttheeretofor County School County is referenced, it will also include the city Naples District. Insurance ReQUirements See following pages. RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights P4•= 1685 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL: In responding to this proposal, each proposer shall include within a 20 -page limit (total for the entire submission) the following items: 1. Project Understanding: Provide a narrative of the proposer's understanding of the overall intent of the services. Identify any issues or concerns of significance that may be appropriate. 2. Proposer's Credentials: Provide, in detail, the proposers credentials for providing Annual Contractual Services for Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights and any information which documents successful and reliable experience in past performance, especially those performances related to the requirements of this Request for Proposal. Include a description of the proposer's business history and number of years in operation. Related project experience shall be restricted to those assignments undertaken within the last five (5) years. 3. Resumes: Provide a signed one (1) page resume, including name, title, address, telephone number, certifications, and previous work assignments for the proposed key personnel. Key personnel includes Project Manager, Crew Leader(s), and MOT Specialist(s). Failure to provide this item may be cause for rejection of the proposal. Credentials will be subject to verification. In the event there should be a change in the person(s) assigned to perform services under this contract, the Contractor shall submit, for approval to the County, the credentials and resumes of the person(s) the Contractor wishes to perform the services under this contract. 4. References: Provide a list of at least three (3) applicable references of agencies that have contracted for similar services offered by the proposer that are considered identical or similar to the requirements of this Request for Proposal. Failure to do so may be cause for rejection of the proposal. The list shall include: a. Company name and address b. Contracting officer and telephone number c. Project Manager's title and telephone number d. A brief, written description of the project. - 5: Office Location and Responsiveness: Proposal rating for this contract will be based on ease of contract administration and responsiveness. The proposer with all key personnel located in Collier County will receive twenty -five (25) points. Proposers principal offices and /or key personnel in other areas will receive fewer points. 6. Equipment: Submit a complete list of all proposer's equipment that will be used on this contract. The equipment list will include the make, model, year of manufacture, and the location of the yard where the equipment is stored when not in use, as well as an t rate for each if required. Aerial equipment must have a working height of fifty ( ) fee Bidder shall own and have in good repair all equipment necessary to perform the described services in particular and the equipment necessary to complete related tasks. Hourly rates will commence once equipment arrives at the service site. In the event that addiiional specialized ust be notified, n equipment apiprovaacThe reimbursement o needed, the user department RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 6 16B5 of additional equipment expense shall rieht t � request documentation of the Contractor's e service site. The County reserves t g cost and to withhold payments until documentation is provided. 6. Present a listing of the propose Examples amplesr are International organizations M n' cipal Signal Association, signals or highway operation. Examp Institute of Traffic Engineering, etc. 7. Present an explanation of the proposer's ability to respond within the time frames as specified in the scope of work. Proposer's ability to provide a complete p nderrthisllitem for failure to submit representative all information as responsiveness. Points will be deducted requested in this RFP. Supplemental Information The proposal shall contain the following attachments, which shall not be considered as a part of the twenty -page limit of the proposal. 1. Statement of contractual litigation that firm is currently involved in, or has been involved in over the past five (5) years, stating points of contention and results if available. 2. Proposer Qualification Form. (Form attached) 3. Insurance Requirements Certification. (Form attached) — 4. Proposer's Checklist. (Form attached) 5. Proposer Declaration Statement. (Form attached) Evaluation Criteria The Collier County procedure for selection is as follows: 1. The County Manager shall appoint a Selection Committee to review all proposals submitted. 2. A Request for Proposals will be solicited by the County Purchasing Agent. ct Manager shall 3. Subsequent to the closing of proposals, the whether 9 proposalnappeaes to be minimally review the proposals received and verify whethe nt responsive to the requirements of the published helicommttee Should both the membe susuchlmeen tin and Project Manager be appointed to of such shalt be open to the public and the Purchasing Aau(1) day in advance notice of a I such meeting in the lobby of the Purchasing 9 at least one meetings. 4. The committee members shall review each Proposal individually and score each proposal based on the evaluation criteria listed below. 5. Prior to the first meeting of the selection committee, the meeting. Said ill notice a notice announcing the date, time and place of the first world days prior to posted in the lobby of the Purchasing Building not less than three (3) 9 Y P the meeting. The Purchasing Agent shall also post notices notice of (11) day�n advance olttall meetings and shall endeavor to post subsequent meetings. RFP 14o.01-32 80 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 7 16B5 6. The committee will compile individual rankings at the discretionpschedule presentaltions om�tthe for each roposal to recommendations. The committee may top - ranked firm(s). The final recommendation wi{I be decided based on review of scores and consensus of committee. shall be negotiated with one or more of the top - ranked 7. Subsequent to award, a contract firms. that have een appved by County Collier County has developed standard contracts (BCC) for lb proje ts.roAll respondents Attorney and the Board of County Comm to this RFP will be required, if selected to ofrfSe Selection for work, Award. This document is contract within forty -five (45) days of Notice available for inspection at the Purchasing Office and a review is encouraged prior to submitting a proposal. 8. Upon the successful completion of negotiations, contracts will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. All Proposals will be evaluated and scored on the following criteria Paints Grading Criteria 10 1. Pricing Proposal 15 2. Project Understanding 3. Expertise and Experience of Designated Staff 20 4. Previous Performance on Similar Jobs 10 20 5. References 6. Office /Yard Location, Availability of Equipment 25 And Responsiveness Total Possible Points 100 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION: The proposal shall be ltheyiu understand eemed an offer to to Collier County. In submitting a proposal, the proposer decla es that and agree to abide by all specifications, provisions, terms rragreesthatrif the contract s all ordinances and policies of Collier County. The prop 9 awarded to their firm, they will perform the work in accordance with the provisions, terms and conditions of the contract. The proposer shall submit four (4) sets of the proposal, the envelope with thee RFPgned and, clearly marked "ORIGINAL"; ea stated onntheeenvelopeaied p Title and Due Date Y Page 8 16B5 RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights By submitting a proposal, the proposer declares that he understands and agrees that this proposal, specifications, provisions, terms and conditions of same, shall become a valid contract between Collier County and the undersigned upon notice of award of contract in writing and/or issuance of a purchase order by Collier County. All proposals, including qualifications and other data pertinent to making an objective evaluation of your firm's capabilities must be forwarded to the Purchasing Department, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Purchasing Building, Naples, Florida 34112 on or before 3:00 pe and date specified Time w II not September considered. tiered 4, 2001. Any proposals received after the As a general rule, Proposals received after the published deadline shall not be accepted and will be returned unopened. However, the Purchasing /General Services Director (or his designee) shall reserve don h right to accept proposals received after the posted deadline under the following con 1. The late proposal is received prior to the response tabulation; 2. The late submission of the proposal is due to the following circumstances, which shall include but not belimited here delivery l'was scheduled commercial such as Fed Ex, UPS, or cou deadline; or 3. The acceptance of said proposal does not afford any competing firm an unfair advantage in the selection process. The term "response tabulation" refers tot closing the list the of the same dayesponding to the RFP that typically occurs shortly after the ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If you have immediate Traffic Operations dnl T regarding Manage r intended Scope of Services, you may co ntact Bob Transportation Operations Department, at 9411774 -8260. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 941- 732 -2667 or e-mail LynWoodt_ collier ov.net. Written questions must be received no later than ten (10) Collier County work days prior to Proposal acceptance date. Should any questions or responses require revisions to the Request for Proposal as originally published, such revisions will be by formal amendment only. RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights INSTRUCTION TO PROPOSERS PRINCIPALS /COLLUSION: By submission of this Proposal, the undersigned, as proposer, does declare that the only person or persons interested in this proposal as principal or principals is/are named therein and that no person other than therein mentioned has any interest in this Proposal or in the contract to be entered into; that this Proposal is made without connection with any person, company or parties making a Proposal, and that it is in all respects fair and in good faith without collusion or fraud. PROPOSAL WITHDRAWAL: No Proposal can be withdrawn after it is filed unless the Proposer makes their request in writing to the County prior to the time set for the opening of Proposals, or unless the County fails to accept it within sixty (60) days after the date fixed for opening. PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION: Submission of a signed Proposal is Proposer's certification that the Proposer will accept any awards made to them as a result of said submission of the terms contained therein. EXCEPTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS OR CONDITIONS: Proposers taking exception to any part or section of these instructions or conditions shall indicate such exceptions on their Proposal. Failure to indicate any exceptions shall be interpreted as the Proposer's intent to fully comply with the specifications as written. LAWS AND REGULATIONS: It shall be understood and agreed that any and all services, materials and equipment shall comply fully with all Local, State and Federal laws and regulations. INSURANCE COSTS: Since these conditions include Insurance Requirements, there may be additional insurance costs to the Proposer's firm. It is, therefore, imperative that the Proposer discuss these requirements with the Proposer's agent, as noted on the Insurance Check List, so that allowances for any additional costs can be made by the Proposer. The Consultant's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price, or the Consultant's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. EXPENSES INCURRED IN PREPARING PROPOSAL: The County accepts no responsibility for any expenses incurred in the Proposal, preparation, or presentation; such expenses to be born exclusively by the Proposer. Page 9 16B5 QUALIFICATION OF PROPOSERS: Before the award of any contract, each Proposer may be required to show (to the complete satisfaction of the county Manager or their designee), that they have the necessary facilities, ability and financial resources to furnish the service as specified herein in a satisfactory manner, and they may also be required to show past history and references which will enable the County Manager, or their designee, to satisfy themselves as to the qualifications. Failure to qualify according to the foregoing requirements will justify the County in rejecting a Proposal. AWARD CHALLENGE: All costs accruing from a Proposal or an award challenged as to quality, etc. (test, etc.) shall be assumed by the challenger. LOBBYING: As per County Ordinance #99 -22, all firms are hereby placed on NOTICE that the Board of County Commissioners does not wish to be lobbied..either individually or collectively... about a project for which a firm has submitted a proposal. Firms and their agents are not to contact members of the County Commission for such purposes as meeting or introduction, luncheons, dinners, etc. During the publication, evaluation and award phases, no firm or their agent shall contact any other employee of Collier County in reference to this solicitation and their prospective or actual Proposal, with the exception of the Purchasing Department except where otherwise expressly permitted by County ordinance,. resolution, or by the RFP document. Failure to abide by this provision may serve as grounds for disqualification for this or a future award to the firm. PROPOSAL FORM: Each Proposer must submit the proposal Form included in this Request for Proposal. SINGLE PROPOSAL: Only one Proposal from a legal entity will be considered. If it is found that a Proposer is interested in more than one Proposal, all Proposals in which such a Proposer is interested will be rejected. SIGNATURE OF PROPOSER: The Proposer must sign the Proposal in the spaces provided for signatures. If the Proposer is an individual, the words "Sole Owner" shall appear after their signature. If the Proposer is a partnership, the word "Partner" shall appear after the signature of one of the partners. If the Proposer is a corporation, the signature required is the Officer, Officers or Individual duly authorized by its by -laws or the Board of Directors to bind the corporation with official corporate seal affixed thereto. INTERPRETATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS AND INVESTIGATION OF PROJECT: Each Proposer R'P No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights shall thoroughly examine the Proposal Documents, and judge for themselves all matters relating to the location and the character of the services they agree to perform. If the Proposer should be of the opinion that the meaning of any part of the proposal Document is doubtful, obscure or contains errors or omissions, they should report such opinion or opinions to the Purchasing Director. Neither the County manager nor their staff shall be responsible for oral interpretation given either by themselves or members of their staff. The issuance of a written addendum shall be the only official method whereby such interpretation will be given. REJECTION OR ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSALS: The right is reserved by Collier County to waive any irregularities in the Proposal, to reject any or all Proposals, to-- re- solicit for Proposals, if desired, and upon recommendation and justification by Collier County to accept the Proposal which in the judgment of the County is deemed the most advantageous for the public and the County of Collier. Any Proposal which is incomplete, conditional, obscure or which contains irregularities of any kind, may be cause for rejection of the Proposal. In the event of default of the successful Proposer, or their refusal to enter into the Collier County contract, the County reserves the right to accept the Proposal of any other Proposer or to re- advertise using the same or revised documentation, at its sole discretion. PROTECTION RIGHTS OF COUNTY: The County reserves the right to include in any contract document such terms and conditions as it deems necessary for the proper protection of the rights of Collier County. PROTEST PROCEDURES: Any actual or prospective respondent to an invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal who is aggrieved with respect to the former, shall file a written protest with the Purchasing Director prior to the opening of the Bid or the due date for acceptance of Proposals. All such protests must be filed with the Purchasing Director no later than 11:00 AM Collier County time on the advertised date for the opening of the Bid or the acceptance date for the Request for Proposals. Award of contract will be made by the Board of County Commissioners in public session. Award recommendations will be posted outside the offices of the Purchasing Department on Wednesdays and Thursdays. Any actual or prospective respondent who desires to formally protest the recommended contract award must file a notice of intent to protest with the Purchasing Director within two (2) calendar days (excluding weekends and County holidays) of the date that the recommended award is posted. Upon filing of Page 10 16B5 said notice, the protesting party will have five (5) days'to file a formal protest and will be given instructions as to the form and content requirements of the formal protest. A copy of the "Protest, Policy" is available at the office of the Purchasing Directr. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME: A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases or real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, or subcontractor under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for Category Two for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion /termination of agreement. LATE RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS• Proposals received after the published deadline shall not be accepted and will be returned unopened. However, the Purchasing /General Services Director (or his designee) shall reserve the right to accept proposals received after the posted deadline under the following conditions: a) The tardy submission of the proposal appears inadvertent and; b) The acceptance of said proposals does not afford any competing firm an unfair advantage in the selection process. 16B5 -i 10 PROPOSERS QUALIFICATION FORM LIST MAJOR WORK PRESENTLY UNDER CONTRACT: % Completed Project Contract Amount 45% Estuary at Grey Oaks Intersection._Modification Golden Gate Parkway at Estuary of Gery Oaks $ 164,374.00 857 WCI Sunset Key Street Lights at Burnt Store Marina $ 42,800.00 95% Aztek Communications Multimedia upgrade at Collier County Gov.p$.nment Complex $ 170,700.00 LIST CURRENT PROJECTS ON WHICH YOUR FIRM IS THE CANDIDATE FOR AWARD: Collier County Installation & Maintenance of Traffic Signals RFP #01 -3253 Estuary -at Grey Oaks and Airport Road Signalization - new intersection Collier County Bayshore Drive Streetscape Project - Street Lighting Have you, at any time, failed to complete a project? ❑ Yes CR No (If the answer is yes, submit details on separate sheet. REFERENCES: Bank(s) Maintaining Account(s): Bank of America 4901 Tamiami Trail North Contact: Denise Heersema Naples, FL 34104 Pursuant to information for prospective bidders /proposers for the above - mentioned proposed project, the undersigned is submitting the information as required with the understanding that it is only to assist in determining the qualifications of the organization to perform the type and magnitude of work intended, and further, guarantee the truth and accuracy of all statements herein made. We will accept your determination of qualifications without prejudice. Nan By: Title Atte Title: Controller Date: 9/14/01 11 RJFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 12 16B5 Collier County Florida Insurance Requirements INSURANCE TYPE REQUIRED LIMITS X 1. Workers' Compensation X 2. Commercial General Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the 1995 I.S.O. form with no limiting endorsements. Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements. Policy must include Employer's Liability with a limit of $1,000,000 each accident. Bodily Iniury & Property Damage $1,000,000 Single Limit Per Occurrence X 3. Indemnification: The ContractorNeod which i consideration aceptd though the siyneng of Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency document, shall hold harmless and defend Collier County and its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees and ail costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by an employee of the named ContractorNendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The ContractorNendor's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the Co r�o {larse ($1o0.00) 'o�moneycreceived on the contract protection. The first One Hundred price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. X 4. Automobile Liability $1,000,000 Each Occurrence Owned /Non - owned /Hired Automobile Included 5. Other Insurance as indicated below: a) Professional Liability -0- b) Builder's Risk $ -0- .................... . ID =941 543 bd-r3 SIMMOND5 ELEC )9 -05 -01 0735 E $ P$ge 13 16B5 � trace of Street Lights uiren'lents � No. of -3280 - �st�1On Main Florida Insurance Req Collier County (Continued) I with the same insurance r shall insure that all subcontractors come Y shall X g• Contra ,tor meet. The same Contractor s onll Provide the Coup requirements that he is requite o aired insurance prove the required with certificates of insurance meets IONAL INSUREW on the Insurance Certificate county must be named as A►DDIT 7, Collier Go '� 'x X for Commercial General Liability- Commissioners shatl be named as the Certificate Holder. X g. Collier County Board of County -- TE: The "Cer�cate Hoiden` should read as follow--: NO Commissioners Collier County Board of County 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL X g. Thirty (3a) Days Cancellation Notice is required. � 10. The Certificate must state the Bid Number and Title. ER'S AND INSU NCE AGENT STATEMENT, B1DD ecifcations, and that the evidence requirements con business days of the award of bid. We understand the in �� equir d within five {5) of said insurance may GUI�r iitlTcI ?iv iJ APZCE, INC 4100 NlF North, Suite 100 apes Florida 3403 Inc. Insur a Agency E Bidder Signa _ i dens Age IM o Bidder - : 36782 09/(05/01 Client LIABILITY INSURANCE MATTE CERTIFICATE �F LIA THIS CERTIFI -NFERS ISNO E RIGHTS UPON THE INFO END EXTEND OR ODUCER Inc, ulfshore Insurance, #100 100 GooFLet34103aa303 aples, 41 261 -3646 ISSRED l Inc. B. SimmonsAvenuer#105 L406 Exchange les FL 34104 NLY AND LDERTHEHIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW• INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE innat suran lr`nsurance B:Bdgefield n Inc IMSURC m INSURER -- INSURER C:' INSURER D: iuc1IRER E: Sap MAY RAGES MENT WITH RESPECT TO WHIG STIXCLCUSIONS AND COND171pNS OF UCH BE ISSUED OR VE VE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FORTHE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED• NOTWIT}{S SUCH CO CT OR OTHER DOC THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE NRS CONDITION OF ANY CONTRA Apr( RE(lUIREMTHE MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. 0 0 OWN POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS 0 MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE TER�AFFORDED BY THE POL►CIES DESCRIBED HEREW IS SUBJECT TO A 1 POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS S POLICY NUMBER 0 2 101101 0 2 / 0 / 2 EACH OCCURRENCE SR TYPE OF INSURANCE Cpp 0 719 8 81 FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire $10 0 0 0 0 A GENERAL LIABILITY MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5 00 X COMMERCIALGENERALLIABILITY PERSONAL &ADV INJURY $1 0 0 0 0 CLAIMS MADEa OCCUR GENERAL AGGREGATE $n0 1 im o I �� -- I PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $2 000 � GENL AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: LOC POL ICY A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY X ANY AUTO 5 ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS j HIRED AUTOS X NON -OWNED AUTOS AGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO CPP0719881 CCC4473167 A EXCESS LIABILITY X OCCUR El CLAIMS MADE DEDUCTIBLE X RETENTION $0 83015343 B I EMPLOYERS' LIABNSA ON AND I I OTHER 1I VEHICLESIEXCLi DE ICRIPTION OF OP Electrical Contractor Certificate Holder is Named General Liability Only. jCollier County Bid #01 -3280 02 /01/0110-2 /01/02 COMBINEDSINGLELIMIT $5500 000 (Ea accident) ___ - -- BODILY INJURY Is (Per person) BODILY INJURY I $ (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE $ (Per accident) AUTO ONLY- EA ACCIDENT $ I EA ACC $ OTHER THAN $ AUTO ONLY: AGG 02/01/01 0 2 / 01 / 0 2 EACH OCCURRENCE 9 nnr.REGATE 04/01/01I04/O1/02 L. W, N 16 100,000 1000 OOU 500,000 JSIONSADDEDBYENDORSEMENTfOrIAWOrkerS, Compensation *30 Days ects to: as Additional Insured As Resp Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights CANCELLATION pFTHE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFOF;E THE ARP SHOULD ANY t DAYS V"r DATETHEREOF,THE ISSUING INSURERWILLENDEAVOR B TFAIL RE DO SOS1 -y NOTICETOTHE CERTIFICATE HOLDERNAMEDTOTHE LEFT, IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANYKIND UPON THE INSURER,ITS AGENT`- Collier County Commissioners Board of County 3301 EasFT a34112 Trail Naples, erXfRD2S- S(7M7)1 of 2 #5188564/M183759 Lg K .- 17M D ® ACORD CORpORATlO! � 1 J w IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(les) must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD25- S(7t97)2 of 2 #S188564/M183759 Page 14 'P No. 01 -3280 — Installation lvtaintenance of Street Lights THIS SHEET MUST BE SIGNED BY VENDOR Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida Purchasing Department 1685 - .. PROPOSERS CHECK LIST Please read carefully, sign in the sp aces indicated and return with Your proposal. m p O R T A N T: action is completed: check off each of the following items as th Proposer should e necessary 1. The RFP has been signed. 2. The RFP prices ions a d totals have been reviewed- 2. 3 The price extensions 4. The payment terms have been indicated. Shiers check has been drawings descriptive literature, etc. have been included. 5. Any required reformation required is included. and the bid bond or ca 6 Any delivery 7. If re uired, the amount of bid bond has been checke included. ( and included. g Any addenda have been sieen addressed to: g. The mailing envelope has b Purchasing Director Collier County Government Center Purchasing Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 The mailing envelope must be sealed and marked with: 10. RFp Number; RFP Title; Opening Date o enin date and ailed or delivered in time to be received no later than the specified 11. The RFP will be rn TITLE ON THE time. (Otherwise RFP cannot be considered.) THE BIDIRFP NUMBER AND ALL COURIER DELIVERED BIDSI FPS MUST HAVE OUT OF THE COURIER PACKET. Ems• Sim 1 is Electrical, Inc. Company resident Signature & Itle 9-114/01 Date Mainte� °e of Street Lights 1 -3280 - Installation & )eclaration Statement Page 15 16B5 FROM: E B' Simmonds Electrical Inc. • DATE DUE: Se ember 14 2001 3:00 PM f County Commissioners ;ounty Government Center Florida 34112 RFP N0.01 -3280 "Installation &Maintenance of Street Lights" :ommissioners: ersons, company idersigned, as Proposer hereby declares that he has examined the Scope of Sa � that the onoY Q himself fully � s that the Proposal pertaining principals are named herein; respects fail and Ito all conditions p to the work to be done. The Proposer further person, company or companies making a Proposal; and it is in al ties interested in this Proposal or the he Contract to be entered into as p t other p without connection with any Request for Proposal A faith, without collusion or fraud. s shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the � 1280 as to be furnished Collier County on August 17, 2001. resent the same to 3280 as issued by accepted, to execute the form of contract and present this contract. da s after being notified of the awarding days will undersigned do agree that should this yal within fiftee(16) Y county Purc basing Director for app execute and deliver said forms of contract within fifteen (15) undersigned do further agree that failure o Se tmmber , 2001 in the ,It in damages to the County. 14th day S WHEREOF, WE have hereu to of subscribed _•dour names on this ______ NITNES , in the Sta Inc . inty of Collier E, B, Sizau►onds Electrica , Firm's Complete Legal Name Check one of the following: 0 Sole Proprietorship © Corporation or P.A. _ Limited Partnership 13 General Partnership Phone No. (941) 643 -2770 FAX No. (941) 643 -6873 quite 105 Address Ne les , FL 34104 -7024 City, State, Zips BY: Signtue Typed and n E. B, Sinmonds President Title •11 . .� RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights 16B5 Page 16 "mil NON- PROPOSER'S RESPONSE For purposes of maintaining an accurate vendor's list and facilitating osr'fa lure o respond to this RFP�P we are interested in ascertaining reasons for prospect p p If yoopriate ur firm is not responding to this RFP, please indicate the reason(s) byrch Agent, any a prCounty items(s) listed below and return this form to Ms. Lyn Wood, Purchasing g Purchasing Department, Purchasing Building, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112. We are not responding to this RFP for the following reason(s): ❑ Services or materials requested not manufactured by us or not available to our company; ❑ Our services or materials do not meet specifications; ❑ Circle one - Specifications were: icable, Too vague, Too rigid, Not clearly understood, Not app or ❑ Insufficient time allowed for preparation of RFP; ❑ Incorrect address used. Please correct: Other reason(s): n/a Name of Firm: E. B. Simonds Electrical, Inc. Mailing Address: 4406 Exchange Avenue, Suite 105 City, State, ZIP: Na les , FL 34104 -7024 Phone ( 941) 643 -2770 FAX (941 ) 643 -6873 By: Signature of Representative Page 17 16B5 RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights PRICE PROPOSAL Emergency or routine street light repairs, new wiring, used street the job installations. The County is DOT Basis of to reimburse the Contractor for labor and materials d. P Estimates Manual. All materials will be paid per the Basi by the Contractor. uConhra'ctor will where noted as "Furnish and Install (F & 1) bid except furnish material items and installation will be priced per hour th ee hund red s indicated as "F&I". xty -five (365) days pee Contractor is to be available twenty -four (24) hours p y, year. Travel time to and from the job site shall not exceed a total of three (3) hours in addition to time spent on job site. I. HOURLY RATES A. Labor (Normal working hours 8:00 a.m. 0o . per man hour to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.) $ 30 p B. Overtime Labor (Emergency overtime rate for hours other than normal "Working Day". Work must be pre- approved by the Traffic Operations Manager or his $ 45-00 oo per man hour designee) C. Heavy Equipment Bucket Truck, Line Truck, Auger, Back Hoe, Etc. Cranes: 35 Ton 12 -112 Ton Rock Auger (Pressure Digger) D. Minor Equipment Cement Saw, Arrow Board, Air Compressor, Jack Hammer, etc. E. Vehicles Passenger Vehicle or pickup truck. Ill. MATERIALS $ 30.0o per unit hour $ 95. oo per unit hour $ 80.00 per unit hour $ 150-00 per unit hour $ 7.00 per unit hour $ 7.00 per unit hour A. Material Markup (Cost plus % - 15 % Any material item that is not covered as a pay item will fall under Material Markup) B. Materials are to be bid by the Contractor as "Furnish Ontnlof' Transportation 'Bass of "Furnish and Install (F & 1) per FFlorida p artme Estimates Manual" and shall include, but not be limited to: 16B5 RFP No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintenance of Street Li hts Pa a 18 AMOUNT j PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION 'ob $ 65.00 TN 339 -1 Misc. As halt As re uired b b ob) $ CY 400 -1 -15 Misc. Class 1 Concrete As re aired $ 25.00 SY 575 -1 -1 (F & Sod, Bahia As re uired by ob As b $ 25.00 Sy 575 -1 -4 & Sod, St. Au stine required $ 3.85 LF 620 -1 -1 & Grounding Electrode $ 3.00 LF 630 -1 -11 & Conduit - Aboveground $ 235.00 EA 635 -1 -11 & Pull Box Electrical Service Assembl $ 150.00 Assembl 639 -1 -12 Overhead Electrical Service Assembly $ 225.00 Assembl 639 -1 -22 Under and $ 1,10 LF 639 -2 -2 Electrical Service Wire Cobrahead $ 218.00 EA 715 -11 -111 Luminaire (Roadway, $ 730.00 EA 715 -11 -113 Luminaire Pole -To $ .24 LF 715 -1 -211 1 Conductors #10 $ .28 LF 715 -1 -212 Conductors #8 $ .38 LF 715 -1 -213 - Conductors #6 $ .45 LF 715 -1 -214 Conductors #4 $ .8o LF 715 -1 -215 Conductors #2 Pull Box Moulded, Hi wa Lighting) $ 135.00 EA EA 715 -14 -21 715 -19 -1 Sur a Protector Pole Base 480V $ 48.00 $ 42.00 EA 715 -21 -1 Luminaire Starter Board I ter 6.00 LF 715 -2 -115 & PVC Conduit Under ound* $ LF 715 -2 -215 (F & 715-2-215 PVC Conduit der Pavement* Un 25.00 LF 715 -2 -415 (F & PVC Conduit Jack & Bore* $ 2 100.00 EA 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Li htin Pole (4-)') $ 2,300. O0 EA 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Lighting Pole 50' Mast Arm Only Roadwa Li tin -to 15' $ 650.00 EA EA 715 -35 -2 715 -36 -22 Fran 'ble Transformer Base $ $ 69.00 EA 715 -36 -24 Fran 'ble Door Assembly $1,035.00 EA 715 -500 -1 Pole Cable Distribution S stem ONLY (Cobrahead representative of No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly $ 185.00 EA General Electric, Hubble, or( er No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly ONLY (Pole -top representative of $ 185.00 EA General Electric, Hubble, or Cooper) $ 159.00 EA No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect 30 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R 3 NEMA 3R $ 179.00 EA No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect 60 Amp- 600 V pole, 3 pole, N $ 240.00 _ EA No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect 100 Am-n- 4 OV r , a of quaze D, Single Pole Breaker ( eP EA No FDOT -BEM # $ 98.00 General Electric, or ITE (480V representative of Square D, No FDOT -BEM # Double Pole Breaker $ 165.00 EA General Electric, or TTE representative of Square D, No FDOT -BEM # Triple Pole Breaker (480V $ 490.00 EA General Electric, or ITE $ 11.00 EA No FDOT -BEM # Dummy Fuse $ 11.00 EA EM No FDOT -B # Fuse for o. base 6)0 in-line, weathe roof, 600V 13.00 No FDOT -BEM # Fuse Holder $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Lam S, 250 $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Lam S, 400 (3-pole, 30 Amp, 600V, varying coil No FDOT -BEM # Lighting Contactor (3 -p $ 249.00 EA voltage) No FDOT -BEM # I Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse 30 Am $ 16.00 EA $ 16.00 EA No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse 60 Am $ 23.00 EA No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse 100 Am Board (100 Amp, 480V, 3- phase, No FDOT -BEM # 'Main Breaker Panel $ 600.00 EA 30 Circuit, NEMA 3R Pa a 19 16B5 $ 22.00 EA Installation &Maintenance , Street Li htsle 3.01 -3280— 480/240 -120 $ 75.00 ;DOT -BEM # Photocell Co trol Lock me S SOOVA ;DOT -BEM # Photocell be installed by the use of directional bore equip' underground, Under pavement, and Jack & Bore Conduit may t the contractor's discretion at the same rate as bid. 16B5. Page 20 RFP No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintenance of ROPOSAL CONTINUED ed b us is hereby declared and guaranteed to be in conformance with the The service to be furnish Y specifications of the County. te the form of contract and e that should this Proposal be accepted, to exn fifteen (15 days after being The undersigned do agree purchasing Director for approval with present the same to the County notified of the awarding of the Contract. agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of contract within The undersigned do furth er 9 fifteen (15) days, will result in damages to the County. WE have hereunto subscribed our namef on riaa 14th day of IN WITNESS WHEREOF, of Collier , in the State o Flo September , 2001 in the County E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Firm's Complete Legal Name Check one of the following: F] Sole Proprietorship [x] Corporation or P.A. [] Limited Partnership [] General Partnership Phone No. 941 643 -2770 FAX No (941) 643 -6873 4406 Exchange Avenue, Suite 105 Address Naples, FL 34104 -7024 City, State, ZIP BY: E• B. Simmonds/ ` Typed and Written Signature President Title NOTE: if you cho C ORIGINAL and ONE OPY of your proposal pages. ,a 4406 Exchange Avenue #105 Naples, Florida 341047024 September 13, 2001 X E. Q. 51MMOND5 Electrical, Inc. STREET LIGHTING • UTILITIES • GENERATORS INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL STATEMENT OF CONTRACTUAL LITIGATION 1685 Naples (941) 643 -2770 E. B. Simmonds Electrical Inc. Is not currently involved in any litigation nor has it been involved in any contractual litigation in the past five (5) years. 1;e"z - —­ – E. B. Simmonds, President E. B. Simmonds Electrical Inc. 4406 Exchange Avenue #105 Naples, Florida 34104 -7024 E. B. 51MMOND5 Electrical, Inc. STREET LIGHTING - UTILITIES - GENERATORS INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL Proposal Submittal RFP #01 -3280 `gnstallation and Maintenance of Street Lights" RE: Page 5 -6 1. pRUJECT UNDERSTANDING: r � •r Naples (941) 643 -2770 E. B. Simmonds Electrical Inc. understands the overall intent of each type of services under this contract be as follows_ Emergency or Routine Services The Contractor will provide all materials and labor for emergency or routine street lights and street light ole installation.. This includes supplying quality materials repairs, new wiring p and the manpower as specified by the County and/or DOT, providing the necessary equipment to complete services within the specified time line. The contractor will coordinate the scheduling of the project with the County Traffic Division when necessary. It is also understood that the contractor will maintain good communications with the County Traffic Division for any changes in schedule and/or scope of the project. Services are of a trouble shooting nature. A brief description of the apparent problem will be given to the contractor and the scope of work cannot be entirely determined in advance. Many variables may be missing in order to determine pricing until the work has started and be added to the scope. There are usually no plans or specifications available for this specific type of rk after inspection of the project. The Contractor is expected to evaluate the scope of the wo job site and determine the best course of action. This means the most efficient way to conduct repairs with the least amount of disruption to the flow of traffic in manner that best serves the interest of the County. 1685 page 2 E. B. Simmouds Electrical, Inc. proposal M iUte Submittal Bid No. O 1 -3280 - Installation 8-' Maintenance of Street Lights apprised of any unexpected discoveries or The contractor is responsible to keep the County initial evaluation of job site. Communications with the Traffic the im of each in project. non - routine events after Prop Division are an important part in equipment and labor used to accomplish the A complete itemization of all materials, to the bid price schedule. and invoiced according ,fie contractor's price for services will be Provided to the County or component for repairs, fittings, such connectors, 90 degree Each bid item is understood to be a mat all necessary used furnish and install is understood to imply to install the item. The labor and equipment heat shrink, tape, g1 The actual amount of fittings, Splices, tenaiice of traffic will differ on every project. for mobilization and main to the price schedule Page and equipment will be reflected the itemization d not listed the bid item list will be billed labor q rovided by the contractor an items 17, Any major items p include specialty County at 15% over the cost of the contractors invoice. This may to the C tY or materials normally provided by the County. 2, cntFDENTIAI.S 1982. It was incorporated in the State of Florida E B. Shnmonds Electrical was founded in workmanship in all our endeavors. There are provide quality a in estimating. We in 1988. Our mission is top � Certification Level II. currently 18 full time employees, of which two are avfull Traffic Signal detailing, field currently have two licensed master electricians purchasing, expediting, are qualified to perform duties in Several key employees and layout {see key personnel resumes). supervision, field engineering erformed installations and During the past three years E. B. Simmonds Electrical Inc. has p the City of Naples and Lighting and Traffic Signals for Collier Count" ac aired maintenance of Street Ligh g basis. Over that period of time the Company has channels with the City of Marco on a regular good communication charm significant experience . the field as well as establishing g excellent credit with local and out of customers and vendors. This also includes establishing more reliable sources for materials and good state vendors which in turns provides us response time from suppliers. as the aintains a fleet communication system with the office ovides an E. B. Simmonds Electrical m the telephone system p control base. In addition to the normal rs t ensure a continuity of service. emergency paging system after hours t s a data base of all sigrializ ation and street light work E B. Simmonds Electrical also maintains This signal and traffic detector locations and all for internal quality control purpose i E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Proposal Submittal Bid No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 3 street light poles locations, numbers and maintenance performed by our crews. As part of a constant desire to improve service our accounting department has created customized work orders and integrated special features in our invoicing system to facilitate matching with bid items and material verification. The majority of the work performed during the past 5 years by E. B. Simmonds Electrical Inc. has been concentrated in the area of Street Lighting and Traffic Signalization. CURRENT PROJECTS (Partial list) r Estuary at Grey Oaks; Intersection Renovation at Golden Gate Parkway • Mainstream Construction; Intersection Modification at Joel Boulevard and Alexander Graham Bell in Lehigh Acres. • G.L. Homes; Saturnia Lakes Subdivision; Decorative Street Lighting Installation • WCI Burnt Store Marina Sunset Key Subdivision; Street Lighting Installation. • Estuary at Grey Oaks Subdivision; Interior Decorative and Street Lighting Installation • City of Naples; Park Shore Drive and Crayton Road Intersection Modification • City of Naples; Park Shore Drive and Gulfshore Blvd. N. Intersection Modification • Lee County "County -Wide Minor Signalization Improvements" (Lee B- 01 -18) • Collier County Contractual Services for Traffic Signals & Street Lights ( #98 -2821) • Collier County On -Call Electrical Repairs and New Installations ( #98 -2879) • Collier County On -Call Electrical Services for Parks & Recreation ( #99 -2965) • City of Marco Island, Maintenance Services for Traffic Signals and Street lighting ■ City of Naples, Contractual Services for Traffic Signals and Street lighting (CC #98 -2821) MAJOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS IN LAST 5 YEARS IN COLLIER COUNTY (partial list) • WCI Development, McGregor and Pine Ridge; newly Signalized Intersection • Collier County Transportation, Forest Lakes entrance lighting service • Pelican Bay Services, Street lighting replacement Phase I and Il • Collier County Transportation, Livingston Road extension phase (between Immokalee Road and Bonita Beach Road) Street Lighting Installation. • Collier County Transportation; Bayshore Drive underground installation for pedestrian decorative lights. • City of Naples, Central Ave and Goodlette Road intersection; mast arm replacement and refurbishing of other three mast arms. 16B5 Page 4 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Proposal Submittal Bid No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights • DeAngelis Diamond, Orange Blossom Intersection Renovation • Collier County Transportation, Devonshire and Santa Barbara new Intersection Installation • D'Jamoos Jerulle, Summerlin and Boy Scout; poles relocation for intersection • WCI Development, Tarpon Bay Sales; Intersection Renovation • WCI Development, Pelican Sound River Club; Street Lighting Collier County, Community Parks Pathway Lighting (#97 -2766) • Collier County Contractual Services for Traffic Signals ( #97 -2712) • Vineyards Development, Terracina Street Lights Installation • WCI Development; Sun City Parking Lot Lighting WCI Development; Pelican Sound Parking Lot Lighting • WCI Development; Pelican Sound River Club Street Lighting • Pulte Homes; Ventura Phase I and Phase H (current) • Collier County Community Parks Pathway Lighting ( #97 -2766) • Collier County Contractual Services for Traffic Signals ( #97 -2712) • Vineyards Development; Street Lights Installation • WCI Development; Gateway Club Parking Lot Lighting WCI Development; Pelican Landing Tuscany Subdivision Street Lighting • WCI Development, Burnt Pine Drive Street Lighting • Pulte Homes; Pelican Marsh Timarron Phase I and Phase R WCI Development; Wildcat Run Parking and Landscape Lighting Pulte Homes; Pelican Marsh Timarron Phase I and Phase H ate' _ = E. B. Simmonds (license holder) License #EC000073 5 Founder and President of E. B. Simmonds, Electrical Inc. since 1982 28 years in the electrical trade. Experienced in all phases of commercial and industrial service work, including motor controls, generators, pumps, medium voltage splicing, fiber optic cabling, splicing and terminating Electrical Work History: Hamilton Electric, St- Petersburg Florida Marquee Electric, Flint, Michigan Universal Electric, Flint, Michigan Shed & Son Electric, Flint, Michigan Trade Education: 0 J page 5 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. proposal Submittal of Street Lights Bid No. Ol -3280 - uahOn` ' Maintenance d training Committee Flint Electrical Joint Apprenticeship an Genessee Community College Magnetek and Generac factory training r University , Fiber Optic A Course izona Sate Welding :Tig/Mig Traffic Signal Certification Level II ent of Transportation, al Certificate Level II Florida Department Association, Traffic Sign International Municipal Sign Traffic Signal Certification Level I Department of Transport ation, Certificate Level I Florida Dep Association, Traffic Signal International Municipal Sign Certificate ent of Transportation, Work Zone Safety Certificate Florida Department Sign Association, Work Zone Safety International Municipal John W. Hart Lead Serviceman E B. Simmonds Electrical Inc. since 1989 work" including motor License 266JE leases of commercial and industrial service Experienced in all p voltage splicing. controls, generators, pumps, high Electrical Work History: Baltimore Maryland; Junior mechanic- Albert L. Auer Inc, Sears, Sharon Pennsylvania; Electrical maintenance Trade Education: Pulaski Pennsylvania; electrical technology New castle school of trades, welding, NEC review. Various courses in motor controls, William G. Meurer Lead Serviceman since 1987 F-. B. Simmonds Electrical Inc. License #ER0012274- 414 ME ce work, including motor Experienced in all Phases of commercial and industrial serer controls, generators, pumps. Trade Education: Apprenticeship program (4 years). Vo -Tech Electrical on, Certification Level 11 (July 2001) Collier County Traffic Signal 3u1 2001) International Municipal Sign Florida Department of Transport ation, Traffic Signal Certificate Level 11 ( y Association' cation Level I Transportation, Traffic Signal Certification Florida Department of TSip Traffic Signal Certificate Level I International Municipal Sign Association, Certificate Department of Transportation, Work Zone Safety Certificate Florida Dep Association, work Zone Safety International Municipal Sign 1685 E. B. 5immonds Electri c & ropsananncbm Lights Bid No. 01 -3280 - Install Luke McKinley Page 6 Field Supervisor E. B. Simmonds Electrical Inc. since 1998 installation and Experienced in commercial and industrial work, including street lighting traffic loop installation. Trade Education: 4th year August 2001) Collier County Vo -Tech Electrical AppApprenticeship program ( Y Gerardo Vargas Field Supervisor E. B. Simronds Electrical Inc. since October 2000 Trenching machine operator approved by State of Florida Department of Transportation and Tren g Florida Highway Adrnunstration lighting installation, including supervising crew, and operating crane, Experienced in street ligh g auger trencher and/or other heavy equipment. 4. RUSA NCES WCI Development Communities 24301 Walden Center Drive Bonita. springs, F134134 Contracting officer: Chris Nicholson phone: 941947-2600 Project manager: Chris Nicholson 941498-8518 Project description: Gulf Harbour Intersection at McGregor Blvd and agog Road Mast arm intersection with pedestrian signals, video Signal loops and advanced loops and interconnect. Project manager: Clark Leaming 253 -2665 Project description: Tarpon Bay Sales at Livingston Road Intersection modification Realignment with WCI private road Signal loop and adavance loop. 1685 Page 7 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Proposal Submittal Bid No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Estuary at Grey Oaks 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Suite 105 Naples, Florida 34105 Contracting officer: David Gensen Phone: 941403-6807 Project manager: David Gensen 941403-6807 Project description: Estuary at Grey Oaks and Golden Gate Parkway Modification for temporary aerial span New mast arm intersection Signal loops and advanced loops Installation of pedestrian signals DeAngelis Diamond 2277 Trade Center Way Suite 101 Naples, F134109 Contracting officer. Jeff Austin phone: 941594-1994 Project manager: Jeff Austin 941597-9003 Project description: Airport Rd First Baptist Church Relocation; Orange Blossom and Aerial span Intersection, realignment modification of Orange Blossom Installation of pedestrian signals Signal loops and advance loops J. L. Wallace, Inc. 13041 McGregor Blvd, Suite 2 Fort Myers, fl 33919 Contracting officer: Jim R. Orlando phone: 941437-1111 Project manager: Jim Orlando 848 -5298 Project Description: Hancock Bridge Parkway and Santa Barbara install loops Lee ve Adding phases to existing intersection, loopsand move pull boxes. 16B5 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Proposal Submittal Page 8 Bid No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Collier County Transportation Traffic Operations 2705 South Horseshoe Dr. Naples, F134104 Contracting officer: Collier County Board of Commissioners Phone: 941774-8260 Project : Bob Tipton 774 -8494 Project: Collier County Contractual Services for Traffic Signals & Street Lights ( #98 -2821) Lee County Transportation Public works Administration, contracts management 1500 Monroe Street, 4th Floor Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Contracting officer: Lee County Board of Commissioners Phone: 941335-2111 Contracts Management Supervisor Cindy Logan 941335-2183 Project description: County -wide Signalization Improvements (B- 01 -18) City of Naples 735 8th Street South Naples, Fl 34102 Contracting officer: George Archibald Phone: 9414344652 Project manager: Mack Smith 9414344655 Project description: Contractual Services for Traffic Signals & Street Lights City of Marco Island 950 North Collier Blvd Suite 308 Marco Island, F134145 Contracting officer: Capp Breeden Phone: 941389-5099 Project manager: Angelo Ubertaccio Project description: 941389-5098 Contractual Services for Traffic Signals & Street Lights Page 9 onds Electrical, Ina. Proposal Submittal 16B.5 E. B. S�mm ation & Ma tenauw of Street Lights BidNo. 01 -3280 - Install 5. prrF i nrs�'ipNS AND BFSPONS Main Location: e Avenue Unit 101 to 106 Our office and non warehouse facility are located at 4406 Exchange in the Naples Production Park. Storage Yard: recently acquired in the Naples Production Park. It is a 1. acre A second location was industrial lot located at 3766 Enterprise Avenue. a ui ment and excess underground It is exclusively used for the storage of our heavy q p strate c Pro ects for future expansion are part of E. B. Simmonds Electrical 5 y ear gi materials. J plan. 6. Eoun�ly (Company owned) Working Year F Equipment Make and Model Height -- "Bucket Truck" Working Height 90 ft. International Navistar 1999 4700 Chassis - with Elliott Hi -Reach Model ECG -4 -85 "Auger Truck" International Working Height 60 ft. 2002* Model 4800 (SR485) with Pitman Model P60H -4T Driller Derrick and Material Handler "Aerial Crane Truck" Working Height 65 ft. 1 987 International Model 1754 with Skyhook Model CW-20OLE Working 1980 "Bucket Truck" Ford F600 Height 35 ft. with Versa Lift 35 "Dump Truck" Ford F-650 2001 With Flatbed & Hoist "Utility Truck" Ford F -250 2001 with Reading Model 98FABSW Service Body 1997 "Cargo Van" Ford E -350 Super Duty Van "Cargo Van" Ford E -350 2000 Super Duty Van Equipment Location E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility 3766 Enterprise Avenue; Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility 3766 Enterprise Avenue Naples, FL 34104 *on order - expected delivery date: Sept. 2001 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility 3766 Enterprise Avenue Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility 3766 Enterprise Avenue Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility 3766 Enterprise Avenue Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility 3766 Enterprise Avenue Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical - Bay 2 4406 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical - Bay 2 4406 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 16B5 Page 10 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Proposal Submittal Bid No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintenance of Sheet Lights E. B. Simmonds Electrical - Bay 2 Pick -up Truck" Ford F -250 4406 Exchange Avenue 2E001 44 Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility Bobcat Model 864 Slid Steer 3766 Enterprise Avenue 2000 Track - Loader with 90" Dozer Naples, FL 34104 Blade and Auger Model 30 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility Bobcat Model 322D 3766 Enterprise Avenue 2001 with C -series Excavator Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility Bobcat Model 863 3766 Enterprise Avenue 1996 Skid Steer Loader Naples, FL 34104 with Backhoe Model 611 - E. B. Simmonds Electrical - Bay 2 Ditch Witch Trencher Model 2020 4406 Exchange Avenue 1995 Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility Ditch Witch Trench Model 7610 3766 Enterprise Avenue 1998 with Backhoe Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility "Arrow Board" Wanco 3766 Enterprise Avenue 1999 Model WTSP75 -LSAC Naples, FL 34104 self contained trailer -Solar Powered E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility Edco Street Saw Model SS18 3766 Enterprise Avenue 1999 Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility 1999 Lo - Loader Portable Patch Kettle 3766 Enterprise Avenue Model 30 Gal. - Insulated K05350 Naples, FL 34104 transported in Wells Cargo trailer E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility 1988 Wells Cargo Trailer 3766 Enterprise Avenue Model TW -142 Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical - Bay 2 1996 Fairbank Trailer 4406 Exchange Avenue Model #41- 31321 -16072 Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical - Bay 2 2000 Trailer Model 1900 Rock 4406 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Storage Facility 1996 Triple Crown Tri -Axel Trailer 3766 Enterprise Avenue Model "Equipment Trailer" Naples, FL 34104 16B5 E. B. Simmonds Electrical, Inc. Proposal Submittal Page 11 Bid No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights 7. AFFILUTED ORGANIZATIONS • Member of International Municipal Signal Association • International Association of Electrical Inspectors • Electrical Council of Florida (Charter Member) 8. ABILITY TO RESPOND • Current and previous experience with multiple Collier County ,City of Naples and City of Marco Service Contracts demonstrates our ability to respond in a timely fashion. 1665 1 _�1 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 1St day of December, 2001, by and between MasTec North American, Inc. d /b /a Designed Traffic Installation Company, hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County ": WITNESSETH: 1. COMMENCEMENT. The Contractor shall commence the work immediately after receiving a Notice to Proceed, in the form of a numbered and approved Purchase Order. The Agreement shall be for a two year period, ending on September 30, 2003. The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for two (2) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to renew the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. The County Manager, or his designee, may, at his discretion, extend the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for up to one hundred eighty (180) days. The County Manager, or his designee, shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide labor, equipment and materials on an as- needed basis for installation, upgrades, emergency repairs and routine maintenance of highway lighting systems in Collier County, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the specifications of RFP #01 -3280 and the contractor's proposal hereto attached and made an integral part of this agreement. 3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price, as specified in Attachment 1 to this Agreement. Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided sufficient funds are included in their budget(s). 4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the Contractor at the following Address: 1 1685 d John P. Coyne, Vice President / General Manager MasTec North America, Inc. d /b /a Designed Traffic Installation Company 2801 S.W. 46th Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Service Agreement must be in writing. 5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. 6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County. All non - County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. 7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty -four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. 1685 "y 8. TERMINATION. Should the contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a seven (7) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non - performance. 9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non -Owned Vehicles and Employee Non - Ownership. C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of $1,000,000 for each accident. Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County thirty (30) days prior to any expiration date. There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. Contractor shall insure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 3 1685 11. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor /Vendor, in consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall hold harmless and defend Collier County and its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorneys' fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by any employee of the named Contractor/ Vendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Contractor/ Vendor's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the Contractor/ Vendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first One Hundred dollars ($100.00) of money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 12. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Transportation Operations Department. 13. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Attachment 1, Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, RFP #01 -3280 Specifications. Attachment 1 pre -empts and replaces all pricing and other compensation arrangements set forth in any of the other listed documents. Attachment 1 sets forth all compensation or reimbursement to which Contractor is entitled under this Agreement. 4 1665 � 14. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. ATTEST: a �� _• ' �; Dwight E;�gd c Clerk o`f' i grts By:, Dated h�i�n s '�Y Kam, gn0 ur A Oil Y 011t��s� TTvne�;grint witness nameT Second Witness _T �w i S Type/ print witness nameT Approved as to form and legal s 'c' Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLO DA By: James N. Coletta, Chairman 5 John P. Coyne, Vice President/ General Manager Typed signature and title Dated: CORPORATE SEAL (corporations only) UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF SOLE DIRECTOR OF MASTEC NORTH AMERICA WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, being the Sole Director of Mastec North America, (the "Company ") do hereby give written consent as follows: RESOLVED, that the following persons were nominated and unanimously elected to serve as Officers of the Corporation until their successors are elected and have qualified: Chief Executive Officer: Executive VP /CFO: Executive VP: Sr. VP /Gen Counsel: Group President: Director of Finance: Sr. VP FL Region: Austin J. Shanfelter Donald P. Weinstein Jose R. Mas Jose M. Sariego Michael W. Hunter Joseph H. Thibadeau, Jr. John P. Coyne 16B5 Can execute Contracts and Bonds for Mastec North America, dba Designed Traffic Installation Co. and Mastec ITS of FL, which can legally bind the corporation with the corporate seal affixed. Dated this 21 day of March, 2002 Michael W. Hunter Mastec North America I hereby acknowledge that the statements contained in the foregoing are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Sworn to and subscribed before me this i day of r% '_yC11 by I [JWho is personally known to n [ ] Has produced identification, - t Notary Signature: Print Name: W- C%Mmtission expires SARAH P. PETERSON Notary Pub0c, Cobb Notary Seal: MY Commission Expires Otto ' Georgia 003 1685 ATTACHMENT NO.1 TO AGREEMENT DATED AS OF DECEMBER 1, 2001 FOR INSTALLA'T'ION AND MAINTENANCE OF STREET LIGHTS BASIS OF COMPENSATION CONTRACT #01 -3280 Compensation to the Contractor under the Agreement is set forth in this Attachment. Materials, including but not limited to those shown in the chart in Subsection II.A. below, are to be provided as "Furnish Only ", except where noted in the chart as "F &I" (Furnish and Install). In each case, provision of the materials is to be per the Florida Department of Transportations Basis of Estimates Manual. Materials paid as "F &I" implicitly include labor. Labor may be charged separately for installation of materials paid as "Furnish Only ", and will be compensated at the appropriate hourly rate set forth below. The Contractor is to be available twenty -four (24) hours per day, three hundred sixty -five (365) days per year. Travel time to and from the job site is not chargeable. I. HOURLY RATES A. Labor (Normal working hours 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.) $ 32.00 per man hour B. Overtime Labor (Emergency overtime rate for hours other than normal "Working Day ". Work must be pre- approved by the Traffic Operations Manager or his designee) $ 47.00 per man hour C. Heavy Equipment Bucket Truck, Line Truck, Auger, Back Hoe, Etc. Cranes: 35 Ton 12 -1/2 Ton $ 35.00 per unit hour $ 95.00 per unit hour $ 80.00 per unit hour Rock Auger (Pressure Digger) $ 130.00 per unit hour D. Minor Equipment Cement Saw, Arrow Board, Air Compressor, Jack Hammer, etc. E. Vehicles Passenger Vehicle or pickup truck. II. MATERIALS 0 1685 $ 7.00 . per unit hour $ 10.00 per unit hour PAY ITEM IDESCRIPTION JUNIT UNIT COST 339 -1 Misc. Asphalt (As required by job) TN $150.00 400 -1 -15 Misc. Class 1 Concrete (As required. by job) Cy $250.00 575 -1 -1 (F & I) Sod, Bahia (As required by job) SY $6.00 575 -1 -4 (F & 1) Sod, St. Augustine (As required by job) SY $10.00 620 -1 -1 (F & 1) Grounding Electrode LF $4.00 630 -1 -11 (F & 1) lConduit – Aboveground LF $3.00 635 -1 -11 (F & 1) Pull Box EA $235.00 639 -1 -12 Overhead Electrical Service Assembly AS $150.00 639 -1 -22 Underground Electrical Service Assembly AS $250.00 639 -2 -2 Electrical Service Wire LF $1.10 715 -11 -111 Luminaire (Roadway, Cobrahead) EA $218.00 715 -11 -113 Luminaire ( Pole -Top) EA $500.00 715 -1 -211 Conductors #10 LF $0.24 715 -1 -212 Conductors #8 LF $0.28 715 -1 -213 Conductors #6 LF $0.38 715 -1 -214 Conductors #4 LF $0.45 715 -1 -215 Conductors #2 LF $0.80 715 -14 -21 Pull Box (Moulded, Highway Lighting) EA $135.00 715 -19 -1 Surge Protector (Pole Base 480V) EA $48.00 715 -21 -1 Luminaire Starter Board (Igniter) EA $42.00 715 -2 -115 OF & 1) PVC Conduit Underground* LF $6.00 715 -2 -215 (F & n PVC Conduit Under Pavement* LF $13.001 715 -2-415 (F & 1) PVC Conduit Jack & Bore* LF $24.00 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Lighting Pole (45') EA $2,100.00 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Lighting Pole (50') EA $2,300.00 715 -35 -2 Mast Arm Only (Roadway Lighting —to 15') EA $565.00 715 -36 -22 rangible Transformer Base EA $298.00 715 -36 -24 Frangible Door Assembly EA $69.00 715 -500 -1 Pole Cable Distribution System EA $1,035.00 1685 No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly ONLY (Cobrahead representative of General Electric, Hubble, or Cooper) EA $159.00 No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly ONLY (Pole -top representative of General Electric, Hubble, or Cooper) EA $134.00 o FDOT -BEM # Disconnect (30 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R) EA $159.00 No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect (60 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R) EA $179.00 No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect (100 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R) EA $240.00 No FDOT -BEM # Single Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE) EA $98.00 No FDOT -BEM # Double Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE) EA $165.00 No FDOT -BEM # Triple Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE) EA $300.00 No FDOT -BEM # Dummy Fuse EA $11.00 No FDOT -BEM # Fuse for pole base (10 Amp, 600 V) EA $11.00 No FDOT -BEM # Fuse Holder (in -line, weatherproof, 600V) EA $25.00 No FDOT -BEM # Lamp (BPS, 250 V) FIA $30.00 No FDOT -BEM # Lamp (BPS, 400 W) EA $30.00 No FDOT -BEM # Lighting Contactor (3 -pole, 30 Amp, 600V, varying coil voltage) EA $249.00 No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse (30 Amp) EA $16.00 No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse (60 Amp) EA $16.00 No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse (100 Amp) EA $23.00 No FDOT -BEM # Main Breaker Panel Board (100 Amp, 480V, 3- phase, 30 Circuit, NEMA 3R) EA $600.00 No FDOT -BEM # Photocell (Twist Lock or Hub Style) EA $25.00 No FDOT -BEM # Photocell Control Transformer (500VA 480/240 -120V) EA $75.00 *Underground, Under Pavement, and jack & Bore Conduit may be installed by the use of directional bore equipment at the contractor's discretion at the same rate as bid. B. Material Markup (Cost plus - Any material item that is not covered as a pay item in Subsection A above will be chargeable under Material Markup. 1665 Legend to Attachment No. 1 to Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights Contract dated as of December 1, 2001 Page 4 of this 4 -page Attachment EA = each AS = per assembly LF = linear foot CY = cubic yard SY = square yard TN = per ton CERTIFICATE NUMBER ATL- 000619794 -00 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS Marsh USA IDC. NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDED IN THE 1560 Sawgrass Corporate Pkwy POLICY. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE SUlte 300 AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN. Sunrise33323 Attn: Sue Rios (954) 838 -3400 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE COMPANY 29226 - -- FTLAU DESIG G /ALW A LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INS CO INSURED COMPANY MasTec North America, Inc. B MasTec I.T.S. D /B /A Designed COMPANY Traffic Installation Company 2801 SW 46th Avenue C Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314 COMPANY D r :." �'50 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE DESCRIBED HEREIN HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED HEREIN FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THE CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE (MM /DDIYY) POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MM /DD /YY) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY RG2 -651- 004268 -032 08/01/02 08/01/03 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,001)000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE F7 OCCUR PRODUCTS - COMP /OP AGG $ 2,000,000 PERSONAL &ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT X Per Pro)Pct 498 FIRE DAMAGE (Anyone fire) $ 1,000,000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY AS2- 651 - 004268 -042 08/01/02 OS /01/03 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 X ANYAUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS X HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ X PROPERTY DAMAGE $ — GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: EACH ACCIDENT $ AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ UMBRELLA FORM $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM A A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY WA2 -650- 004268 012 08/01/02 WC2 -651- 004263-022 081'011'02 08/01/03 '`8101/03 w sTATU- oTH- X TORYLIMITS EL EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,008 THE PROPRIETOR/ X PARTNERS /EXECUTIVE INCL EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 EL DISEASE -EACH EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 OFFICERS ARE: EXCL OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS /LOCATIONSIVEHICLES /SPECIAL ITEMS (LIMITS MAY BE SUBJECT TO DEDUCTIBLES OR RETENTIONS) JOB DESC: CONTRACTS RFP -01 -3280 - INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF STREET LIGHTS. CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS ADDITIONAL INSURED AS RESPECT GENERAL LIABILITY. COLLIER COUNTY ANNUAL CONTRACT. CEiT �ICATE J�C?LDER j =; �� .. a. ,... SAN CELL ATI4N "� SHOULD ANY OF THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,f COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT THE INSURER AFFORDING COVERAGE WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED HEREIN, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER AFFORDING COVERAGE, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FL 34112 MARSH USA INC. BY: Frances Sigurani 94"ta, Ii6 4k 1665 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION PURCHASING BUILDING NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 732-2667 FAX (941) 732-0844 http://co.collier.fl.us DATE: August 17, 2001 TO: Prospective Proposers FROM: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M. U1VW Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: RFP #01-3280— Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights Pursuant to County Manager action, the Transportation Operations Department is seeking the services of a qualified firm capable of providing installation and maintenance of street light services. Please refer to the Legal Advertisement contained in the enclosed Proposal Package for the time and the due date for proposal submission. These professional services will include, but not be limited to the "Scope of Services" as described herein. If you have any immediate questions regarding the intended Scope of Services, you may contact Bob Tipton, Traffic Operations Manager, Transportation Operations Department, at 941/774 -8260. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 732 -2667 or e-mail LynWood(•:colliergov.net. We look forward to your participation in this RFP process. cc: Bob Tipton, Transportation Operations RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 2 1685 PUBLIC NOTICE OR REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Pursuant to action approved by the County Manager, Sealed Proposals for Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights will be received until 3:00 p.m. on September 14, 2001 at the Purchasing Department, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Purchasing Building, Naples, Florida 34112. RFP #01 -3280 "Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights" All proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the Instructions to Proposers and the Request for Proposal Specifications. Collier County does not discriminate based on age, race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability or marital status. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: /S/ STEVE CARNELL Purchasing Director This Public Notice was posted in the lobby of the General Services Building, Collier County Government Center on August 17, 2001. RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 3 SCOPE OF SERVICES 1665 The work consists of providing labor, equipment, and materials to assist the Collier County Traffic Operations Department, on an as- needed basis, with installation, upgrades, emergency repairs, and routine maintenance of highway lighting systems throughout Collier County. The work will include providing labor and equipment for routine Street Light repairs, replacing underground wiring, replacing Street Light poles and /or foundations, and new installations of underground wiring, foundations, and Street Lights and poles. The Contractor shall have a maximum of twenty (20) working days to complete underground and /or overhead repairs, including replacement of downed street light poles. The Contractor shall have a maximum of sixty (60) days to complete the work required to install a new street light. A written notification shall be provided to the County requesting additional time should there be unforeseen circumstances hindering the completion of a job. Should the County determine that a situation is an emergency, the Contractor shall have a maximum of two (2) hours to secure the area to a safe condition until permanent repairs can be accomplished. Miscellaneous Materials and Services Minor materials and services necessary to complete the contract services as defined above shall be provided by the Contractor. The County reserves the right to furnish any and all of the above minor materials and services should such action be in the County's best interest; however, it is not our intention to furnish materials at this time. Note: All items shall be bid per Florida Department of Transportation "Basis of Estimate Manual" as "FURNISH" except where noted as "FURNISH and INSTALL (F & I)." Contractor will furnish material items and installation will be priced per hour unless indicated as "F & I ". Any material item that is NOT covered as a pay item will fall under Material Markup. Contractors Requirements /Responsibilities A. The contractor shall be responsible for safe Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) practices during all phases of project work. Contractor will provide personnel trained and certified to a minimum of IMSA Safety in the Work Zone certification to oversee set -up of MOT. Contractor will assure the use of safety vests, traffic cones, and arrow boards at all work locations. Observation of unsafe MOT practices by County Transportation or Risk Management personnel will be grounds for an order to cease work. Continued unsafe MOT practices will be grounds for voiding this contract. B. The contractor shall be capable of providing field engineering and technical assistance as may be needed within the contract period. C. All work performed by the contractor shall be in accordance with the Florida Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000 Edition) and Roadway and Traffic Design Standard Index (2000 Edition). D. The contractor shall provide the Traffic Operations Department with copies of insurance to be in effect during the contract period in accordance with F. D. O. T. Standard Specifications 7 -13.1 and 7- 13.2.2 RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 4 1685 E. As a matter of public safety and liability, emergency service response time shall be adhered to strictly to maintain a minimal level of County liability. Failure by the Contractor to provide expedient response as outlined in scope of work shall constitute contractual default. F. The County reserves the right to undertake any work outlined in these specifications by County employees or by other contracts if such action is in the best interest of the County. G. The Contractor may be required to perform work at night and /or on weekends due to lane closure prohibitions during the hours of 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. weekdays on major collectors or arterials. Contract Period This contract shall be in effect for a period of two (2) years, commencing with the issuance of a purchase order, and ending September 30, 2003. The prices quoted on the proposal shall remain in effect for the term of the contract. Contract Renewal The County, at its discretion, and with the consent of the contracted vendor, shall have the option to renew this Agreement under the same terms and conditions for two (2) additional one (1) year periods. Contract Termination Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County per the requirements of this RFP, the County may terminate this Agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a seven (7) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non - performance. Estimated Amount of Work The estimated amount of this contract for FY 01/02 is $275,000.00. The services required by this contract shall include but not be limited to the items /services described in the Specifications. The County shall order items /services as required but makes no guarantee as to the quantity, number, type or distribution of items /services that will be ordered or required by this contract. Special Note The City of Naples and the Collier County School District along with Collier County Government, have entered into a co- operative buying consortium, and may, if they so desire, purchase this service under the terms and conditions of this contract. Heretofore, wherever the County is referenced, it will also include the City of Naples and the Collier County School District. Insurance Requirements See following pages. RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 5 1685 PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL: In responding to this proposal, each proposer shall include within a 20 -page limit (total for the entire submission) the following items: Project Understanding: Provide a narrative of the proposer's understanding of the overall intent of the services. Identify any issues or concerns of significance that may be appropriate. 2. Proposer's Credentials: Provide, in detail, the proposers credentials for providing Annual Contractual Services for Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights and any information which documents successful and reliable experience in past performance, especially those performances related to the requirements of this Request for Proposal. Include a description of the proposer's business history and number of years in operation. Related project experience shall be restricted to those assignments undertaken within the last five (5) years. 3. Resumes: Provide a signed one (1) page resume, including name, title, address, telephone number, certifications, and previous work assignments for the proposed key personnel. Key personnel includes Project Manager, Crew Leader(s), and MOT Specialist(s). Failure to provide this item may be cause for rejection of the proposal. Credentials will be subject to verification. In the event there should be a change in the person(s) assigned to perform services under this contract, the Contractor shall submit, for approval to the County, the credentials and resumes of the person(s) the Contractor wishes to perform the services under this contract. 4. References: Provide a list of at least three (3) applicable references of agencies that have contracted for similar services offered by the proposer that are considered identical or similar to the requirements of this Request for Proposal. Failure to do so may be cause for rejection of the proposal. The list shall include: a. Company name and address b. Contracting officer and telephone number c. Project Manager's title and telephone number d. A brief, written description of the project. 5. Office Location and Responsiveness: Proposal rating for this contract will be based on ease of contract administration and responsiveness. The proposer with all key personnel located in Collier County will receive twenty -five (25) points. Proposers principal offices and /or key personnel in other areas will receive fewer points. 6. Equipment: Submit a complete list of all proposer's equipment that will be used on this contract. The equipment list will include the make, model, year of manufacture, and the location of the yard where the equipment is stored when not in use, as well as an hourly rate for each if required. Aerial equipment must have a working height of fifty (50) feet. Bidder shall own and have in good repair all equipment necessary to perform the described services in particular and the equipment necessary to complete related tasks. Hourly rates will commence once equipment arrives at the service site. In the event that additional specialized and /or heavy equipment (i.e., backhoe, mudhog) is needed, the user department must be notified, in advance, for approval. The reimbursement RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation &Maintenance of Street Lights Page 6 16B5 of additional equipment expense shall be at cost and will commence once it arrives at the service site. The County reserves the right to request documentation of the Contractor's cost and to withhold payments until documentation is provided. 6. Present a listing of the proposer's' membership in affiliated organizations pertinent to traffic signals or highway operation. Examples are International Municipal Signal Association, Institute of Traffic Engineering, etc. 7. Present an explanation of the proposer's ability to respond within the time frames as specified in the scope of work. Proposer's ability to provide a complete proposal will be considered representative of the firm's responsiveness. Points will be deducted under this item for failure to submit all information as requested in this RFP. Supplemental Information The proposal shall contain the following attachments, which shall not be considered as a part of the twenty -page limit of the proposal: 1. Statement of contractual litigation that firm is currently involved in, or has been involved in over the past five (5) years, stating points of contention and results if available. 2. Proposer Qualification Form. (Form attached) 3. Insurance Requirements Certification. (Form attached) 4. Proposer's Checklist. (Form attached) 5. Proposer Declaration Statement. (Form attached) Evaluation Criteria The Collier County procedure for selection is as follows: 1. The County Manager shall appoint a Selection Committee to review all proposals submitted. 2. A Request for Proposals will be solicited by the County Purchasing Agent. 3. Subsequent to the closing of proposals, the Purchasing Agent and Project Manager shall review the proposals received and verify whether each proposal appears to be minimally responsive to the requirements of the published RFP. Should both the Purchasing Agent and Project Manager be appointed to the committee as voting members, such meetings shall be open to the public and the Purchasing Agent shall publicly post prior notice of such meeting in the lobby of the Purchasing Building at least one (1) day in advance of all such meetings. 4. The committee members shall review each Proposal individually and score each proposal based on the evaluation criteria listed below. 5. Prior to the first meeting of the selection committee, the Purchasing Agent will post a notice announcing the date, time and place of the first committee meeting. Said notice shall be posted in the lobby of the Purchasing Building not less than three (3) working days prior to the meeting. The Purchasing Agent shall also post prior notice of all subsequent committee meetings and shall endeavor to post such notices at least one (1) day in advance of all subsequent meetings. RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 7 16B5 6. The committee will compile individual rankings for each proposal to determine committee recommendations. The committee may at their discretion, schedule presentations from the top - ranked firm(s). The final recommendation will be decided based on review of scores and consensus of committee. 7. Subsequent to award, a contract shall be negotiated with one or more of the top- ranked firms. Collier County has developed standard contracts that have been approved by County Attorney and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) for all projects. All respondents to this RFP will be required, if selected to perform the work, to execute the standard contract within forty -five (45) days of Notice of Selection for Award. This document is available for inspection at the Purchasing Office and a review is encouraged prior to submitting a proposal. 8. Upon the successful completion of negotiations, contracts will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. All Proposals will be evaluated and scored on the following criteria Grading Criteria Points 1. Pricing Proposal 10 2. Project Understanding 15 3. Expertise and Experience of Designated Staff 20 4. Previous Performance on Similar Jobs 10 5. References 20 6. Office /Yard Location, Availability of Equipment And Responsiveness 25 Total Possible Points 100 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION: The proposal shall be deemed an offer to provide services to Collier County. In submitting a proposal, the proposer declares that they understand and agree to abide by all specifications, provisions, terms and conditions of same, and all ordinances and policies of Collier County. The proposer agrees that if the contract is awarded to their firm, they will perform the work in accordance with the provisions, terms and conditions of the contract. The proposer shall submit four (4) sets of the proposal, the original properly signed and clearly marked "ORIGINAL "; submitted in a sealed envelope with the RFP Number, Title and Due Date clearly stated on the envelope. RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 8 16B5 By submitting a proposal, the proposer declares that he understands and agrees that this proposal, specifications, provisions, terms and conditions of same, shall become a valid contract between Collier County and the undersigned upon notice of award of contract in writing and /or issuance of a purchase order by Collier County. All proposals, including qualifications and other data pertinent to making an objective evaluation of your firm's capabilities must be forwarded to the Purchasing Department, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Purchasing Building, Naples, Florida 34112 on or before 3:00 p.m. Collier County Time on September 14, 2001. Any proposals received after the time and date specified will not be considered. As a general rule, Proposals received after the published deadline shall not be accepted and will be returned unopened. However, the Purchasing /General Services Director (or his designee) shall reserve the right to accept proposals received after the posted deadline under the following conditions: 1. The late proposal is received prior to the response tabulation; 2. The late submission of the proposal is due to the following circumstances, which shall include but not be limited to: late delivery by commercial carrier such as Fed Ex, UPS, or courier where delivery was scheduled before the deadline; or 3. The acceptance of said proposal does not afford any competing firm an unfair advantage in the selection process. The term "response tabulation" refers to tabulating the list of the firms responding to the RFP that typically occurs shortly after the closing time on the same day. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If you have any immediate questions regarding the intended Scope of Services, you may contact Bob Tipton, Traffic Operations Manager, Transportation Operations Department, at 941/774 -8260. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 941 - 732 -2667 or e-mail I .nWgoac�lligr�;ov_net. Written questions must be received no later than ten (10) Collier County work days prior to Proposal acceptance date. Should any questions or responses require revisions to the Request for Proposal as originally published, such revisions will be by formal amendment only. RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights INSTRUCTION TO PROPOSERS PRINCIPALS /COLLUSION: By submission of this Proposal, the undersigned, as proposer, does declare that the only person or persons interested in this proposal as principal or principals is /are named therein and that no person other than therein mentioned has any interest in this Proposal or in the contract to be entered into; that this Proposal is made without connection with any person, company or parties making a Proposal, and that it is in all respects fair and in good faith without collusion or fraud. PROPOSAL WITHDRAWAL: No Proposal can be withdrawn after it is filed unless the Proposer makes their request in writing to the County prior to the time set for the opening of Proposals, or unless the County fails to accept it within sixty (60) days after the date fixed for opening. PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION: Submission of a signed Proposal is Proposer's certification that the Proposer will accept any awards made to them as a result of said submission of the terms contained therein. EXCEPTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS OR CONDITIONS: Proposers taking exception to any part or section of these instructions or conditions shall indicate such exceptions on their Proposal. Failure to indicate any exceptions shall be interpreted as the Proposer's intent to fully comply with the specifications as written. LAWS AND REGULATIONS: It shall be understood and agreed that any and all services, materials and equipment shall comply fully with all Local, State and Federal laws and regulations. INSURANCE COSTS: Since these conditions include Insurance Requirements, there may be additional insurance costs to the Proposer's firm. It is, therefore, imperative that the Proposer discuss these requirements with the Proposer's agent, as noted on the Insurance Check List, so that allowances for any additional costs can be made by the Proposer. The Consultant's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price, or the Consultant's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. EXPENSES INCURRED IN PREPARING PROPOSAL: The County accepts no responsibility for any expenses incurred in the Proposal, preparation, or presentation; such expenses to be born exclusively by the Proposer. Page 9 7.665 QUALIFICATION OF PROPOSERS: Before the award of any contract, each Proposer may be required to show (to the complete satisfaction of the county Manager or their designee), that they have the necessary facilities, ability and financial resources to furnish the service as specified herein in a satisfactory manner, and they may also be required to show past history and references which will enable the County Manager, or their designee, to satisfy themselves as to the qualifications. Failure to qualify according to the foregoing requirements will justify the County in rejecting a Proposal. AWARD CHALLENGE: All costs accruing from a Proposal or an award challenged as to quality, etc. (test, etc.) shall be assumed by the challenger. LOBBYING: As per County Ordinance #99 -22, all firms are hereby placed on NOTICE that the Board of County Commissioners does not wish to be lobbied..either individually or collectively ... about a project for which a firm has submitted a proposal. Firms and their agents are not to contact members of the County Commission for such purposes as meeting or introduction, luncheons, dinners, etc. During the publication, evaluation and award phases, no firm or their agent shall contact any other employee of Collier County in reference to this solicitation and their prospective or actual Proposal, with the exception of the Purchasing Department except where otherwise expressly permitted by County ordinance, resolution, or by the RFP document. Failure to abide by this provision may serve as grounds for disqualification for this or a future award to the firm. PROPOSAL FORM: Each Proposer must submit the proposal Form included in this Request for Proposal. SINGLE PROPOSAL: Only one Proposal from a legal entity will be considered. If it is found that a Proposer is interested in more than one Proposal, all Proposals in which such a Proposer is interested will be rejected. SIGNATURE OF PROPOSER: The Proposer must sign the Proposal in the spaces provided for signatures. If the Proposer is an individual, the words "Sole Owner" shall appear after their signature. If the Proposer is a partnership, the word "Partner" shall appear after the signature of one of the partners. If the Proposer is a corporation, the signature required is the Officer, Officers or Individual duly authorized by its by -laws or the Board of Directors to bind the corporation with official corporate seal affixed thereto. INTERPRETATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS AND INVESTIGATION OF PROJECT: Each Proposer RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights shall thoroughly examine the Proposal Documents, and judge for themselves all matters relating to the location and the character of the services they agree to perform. If the Proposer should be of the opinion that the meaning of any part of the proposal Document is doubtful, obscure or contains errors or omissions, they should report such opinion or opinions to the Purchasing Director. Neither the County manager nor their staff shall be responsible for oral interpretation given either by themselves or members of their staff. The issuance of a written addendum shall be the only official method whereby such interpretation will be given. REJECTION OR ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSALS: The right is reserved by Collier County to waive any irregularities in the Proposal, to reject any or all Proposals, to re- solicit for Proposals, if desired, and upon recommendation and justification by Collier County to accept the Proposal which in the judgment of the County is deemed the most advantageous for the public and the County of Collier. Any Proposal which is incomplete, conditional, obscure or which contains irregularities of any kind, may be cause for rejection of the Proposal. In the event of default of the successful Proposer, or their refusal to enter into the Collier County contract, the County reserves the right to accept the Proposal of any other Proposer or to re- advertise using the same or revised documentation, at its sole discretion. PROTECTION RIGHTS OF COUNTY: The County reserves the right to include in any contract document such terms and conditions as it deems necessary for the proper protection of the rights of Collier County. PROTEST PROCEDURES: Any actual or prospective respondent to an Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal who is aggrieved with respect to the former, shall file a written protest with the Purchasing Director prior to the opening of the Bid or the due date for acceptance of Proposals. All such protests must be filed with the Purchasing Director no later than 11:00 AM Collier County time on the advertised date for the opening of the Bid or the acceptance date for the Request for Proposals. Award of contract will be made by the Board of County Commissioners in public session. Award recommendations will be posted outside the offices of the Purchasing Department on Wednesdays and Thursdays. Any actual or prospective respondent who desires to formally protest the recommended contract award must file a notice of intent to protest with the Purchasing Director within two (2) calendar days (excluding weekends and County holidays) of the date that the recommended award is posted. Upon filing of Page 10 16B5 said notice, the protesting party will have five (5) days 'to file a formal protest and will be given instructions as to the form and content requirements of the formal protest. A copy of the "Protest Policy" is available at the office of the Purchasing Director. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME: A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases or real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, or subcontractor under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for Category Two for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion /termination of agreement. LATE RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS: Proposals received after the published deadline shall not be accepted and will be returned unopened. However, the Purchasing /General Services Director (or his designee) shall reserve the right to accept proposals received after the posted deadline under the following conditions: a) The tardy submission of the proposal appears inadvertent and; b) The acceptance of said proposals does not afford any competing firm an unfair advantage in the selection process. PROPOSERS QUALIFICATION FORM 16 B 5 y .. LIST MAJOR WORK PRESENTLY UNDER CONTRACT: % Completed Project Contract Amount A ,a LIST CURRENT PROJECTS ON WHICH YOUR FIRM IS THE CANDIDATE FOR AWARD: Have you, at any time, failed to complete a project? ❑ Yes ❑ No (If the answer is yes, submit details on separate sheet. REFERENCES: Bank(s) Maintaining Account(s): Pursuant to information for prospective bidders /proposers for the above - mentioned proposed project, the undersigned is submitting the information as required with the understanding that it is only to assist in determining the qualifications of the organization to perform the type and magnitude of work intended, and further, guarantee the truth and accuracy of all statements herein made. We will accept your determination of qualifications without prejudice. Name of Organization: By: Title: Attested By: Title: 11 RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 12 Collier County Florida 16B5 Insurance Requirements INSURANCE TYPE REQUIRED LIMITS X 1. Workers' Compensation X 2. Commercial General Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the 1995 I.S.O. form with no limiting endorsements. Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements. Policy must include Employer's Liability with a limit of $1,000,000 each accident. Bodily Injury & Property Damage $1,000,000 Single Limit Per Occurrence X 3. Indemnification: The Contractor/Vendor, in consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall hold harmless and defend Collier County and its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by an employee of the named Contractor/Vendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Contractor/Vendor's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the Contractor/Vendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. X 4. Automobile Liability $1,000,000 Each Occurrence Owned /Non- owned /Hired Automobile Included 5. Other Insurance as indicated below: a) Professional Liability $-0- b) Builder's Risk $ -0- RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 13 Collier County Florida Insurance Requirements 16B5 (Continued) X 6. Contractor shall insure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide the County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. X 7. Collier County must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial General Liability. X 8. Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as the Certificate Holder. NOTE: The "Certificate Holder" should read as follows: Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 X 9. Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice is required. X 10. The Certificate must state the Bid Number and Title. BIDDER'S AND INSURANCE AGENT STATEMENT: We understand the insurance requirements contained in these specifications, and that the evidence of said insurance may be required within five (5) business days of the award of bid. Bidder Signature of Bidder Insurance Agency Signature of Bidder's Agent 1685 RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 14 THIS SHEET MUST BE SIGNED BY VENDOR Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida Purchasing Department PROPOSERS CHECK LIST I M P O R T A N T: Please read carefully, sign in the spaces indicated and return with your proposal. Proposer should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed: 1. The RFP has been signed. 2. The RFP prices offered have been reviewed. 3. The price extensions and totals have been checked. 4. The payment terms have been indicated. s. Any required drawings, descriptive literature, etc. have been included. s. Any delivery information required is included. 7. If required, the amount of bid bond has been checked, and the bid bond or cashiers check has been included. s. Any addenda have been signed and included. 9. The mailing envelope has been addressed to: Purchasing Director Collier County Government Center Purchasing Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 10. The mailing envelope must be sealed and marked with: • RFP Number; • RFP Title; • Opening Date 11. The RFP will be mailed or delivered in time to be received no later than the specified opening date and time. (Otherwise RFP cannot be considered.) ALL COURIER DELIVERED BIDS /RFPS MUST HAVE THE BID /RFP NUMBER AND TITLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE COURIER PACKET. Company Name Signature & Title Date RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Declaration Statement =101"" Page 15 1685 DATE DUE: September 14, 2001 Ca- 3:00 PM Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government Center Naples, Florida 34112 RE: RFP NO. 01 -3280 "Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights" Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Proposer hereby declares that he has examined the Scope of Services, and informed himself fully in regard to all conditions pertaining to the work to be done. The Proposer further declares that the only persons, company or parties interested in this Proposal or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that the Proposal is made without connection with any other person, company or companies making a Proposal; and it is in all respects fail and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The services to be furnished by us shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the Request for Proposal #01 -3280 as issued by Collier County on August 17, 2001. The undersigned do agree that should this Proposal be accepted, to execute the form of contract and present the same to the County Purchasing Director for approval within fifteen (15) days after being notified of the awarding of this contract. The undersigned do further agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of contract within fifteen (15) days will result in damages to the County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this day 2001 in the County of , in the State of Firm's Complete Legal Name Check one of the following: ❑ Sole Proprietorship ❑ Corporation or P.A. ❑ Limited Partnership ❑ General Partnership Phone No. FAX No. Address City, State, Zip BY: Typed and Written Signature Title RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights NON- PROPOSER'S RESPONSE Page 16 1665` For purposes of maintaining an accurate vendor's list and facilitating your firm's response to our RFP, we are interested in ascertaining reasons for prospective proposer's failure to respond to this RFP. If your firm is not responding to this RFP, please indicate the reason(s) by checking any appropriate items(s) listed below and return this form to Ms. Lyn Wood, Purchasing Agent, Collier County Purchasing Department, Purchasing Building, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112. We are not responding to this RFP for the following reason(s): ❑ Services or materials requested not manufactured by us or not available to our company; ❑ Our services or materials do not meet specifications; ❑ Circle one - Specifications were: Not clearly understood, Not applicable, Too vague, Too rigid, or ❑ Insufficient time allowed for preparation of RFP; ❑ Incorrect address used. Please correct: Other reason(s): Name of Firm: Mailing Address: City, State, ZIP: Phone ( ) in FAX ( ) Signature of Representative RFP No. 0 1-32 80 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights PRICE PROPOSAL Page 17 16B5', Emergency or routine street light repairs, new wiring, and street light pole installations. The County is to reimburse the Contractor for labor and materials used to complete the job per the FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual. All materials will be paid per the Basis of Estimates Manual as "Furnish" except where noted as "Furnish and Install (F & 1)" bid submitted by the Contractor. Contractor will furnish material items and installation will be priced per hour except where indicated as "F &I ". The Contractor is to be available twenty -four (24) hours per day, three hundred sixty -five (365) days per year. Travel time to and from the job site shall not exceed a total of three (3) hours in addition to time spent on job site. I. HOURLY RATES A. Labor (Normal working hours 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.) $ B. Overtime Labor (Emergency overtime rate for hours other than normal "Working Day ". Work must be pre- approved by the Traffic Operations Manager or his designee) $ per man hour per man hour C. Heavy Equipment Bucket Truck, Line Truck, Auger, Back Hoe, Etc. $ per unit hour Cranes: 35 Ton $ per unit hour 12 -1/2 Ton $ per unit hour Rock Auger (Pressure Digger) $ per unit hour D. Minor Equipment Cement Saw, Arrow Board, Air Compressor, Jack Hammer, etc. $ per unit hour E. Vehicles Passenger Vehicle or pickup truck. $ per unit hour 11. MATERIALS A. Material Markup (Cost plus % - _ Any material item that is not covered as a pay item will fall under Material Markup) B. Materials are to be bid by the Contractor as "Furnish Only" except where noted as "Furnish and Install (F & 1)" per Florida Department of Transportation "Basis of Estimates Manual' and shall include, but not be limited to: RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 18 1685 PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 339 -1 Misc. Asphalt (As required by ob) $ TN 400 -1 -15 Misc. Class 1 Concrete As required by ob $ CY 575 -1 -1 (F & I) Sod, Bahia As required by ob $ SY 575 -1 -4 F & I) Sod, St. Augustine As required by ob $ SY 620 -1 -1 (F & I) Grounding Electrode $ LF 630 -1 -11 (F & n Conduit – Aboveground $ LF 635 -1 -11 (F & I) Pull Box $ EA 639 -1 -12 Overhead Electrical Service Assembly $ Assembly 639 -1 -22 Underground Electrical Service Assembly $ Assembly 639 -2 -2 Electrical Service Wire $ LF 715 -11 -111 Luminaire (Roadway, Cobrahead) $ EA 715 -11 -113 Luminaire Pole -To) $ EA 715 -1 -211 Conductors #10 $ LF 715 -1 -212 Conductors #8 $ LF 715 -1 -213 Conductors #6 $ LF 715 -1 -214 Conductors #4 $ LF 715 -1 -215 Conductors #2 $ LF 715 -14 -21 Pull Box Moulded, Highway Lighting) $ EA 715 -19 -1 Surge Protector Pole Base 480V $ EA 715 -21 -1 Luminaire Starter Board (Igniter) $ EA 715 -2 -115 (F & I) PVC Conduit Underground* $ LF 715 -2 -215 (F & PVC Conduit Under Pavement* $ LF 715 -2 -415 (F & n PVC Conduit Jack & Bore* $ LF 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Lighting Pole (45' ) $ EA 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Lighting Pole (50') $ EA 715 -35 -2 Mast Arm Only (Roadway Lighting—to 15') $ EA 715 -36 -22 Frangible Transformer Base $ EA 715 -36 -24 Frangible Door Assembly $ EA 715 -500 -1 Pole Cable Distribution System $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly ONLY (Cobrahead representative of General Electric, Hubble, or Cooper) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly ONLY (Pole -top representative of General Electric, Hubble, or Cooper) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect 30 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect 60 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect 100 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Single Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE ) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Double Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE ) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Triple Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Dummy Fuse $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Fuse for pole base 10 Amp, 600 V $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Fuse Holder in -line, weatherproof, 600V No FDOT -BEM # Lam BPS, 250 $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Lam BPS, 400 W $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Lighting Contactor (3 -pole, 30 Amp, 600V, varying coil voltage) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse 30 Am $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse 60 Am $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse 100 Am) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Main Breaker Panel Board (100 Amp, 480V, 3 -phase, 30 Circuit, NEMA 3R) $ EA RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 19 16B5 I r No FDOT -BEM # Photocell Twist Lock or Hub Style) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # I Photocell Control Transformer 500VA 480/240 -120V $ EA *Underground, Under Pavement, and Jack & Bore Conduit may be installed by the use of directional bore equip at the contractor's discretion at the same rate as bid. RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 20 16B5 PROPOSAL CONTINUED The service to be furnished by us is hereby declared and guaranteed to be in conformance with the specifications of the County. The undersigned do agree that should this Proposal be accepted, to execute the form of contract and present the same to the County Purchasing Director for approval within fifteen (15) days after being notified of the awarding of the Contract. The undersigned do further agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of contract within fifteen (15) days, will result in damages to the County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this day of , 2001 in the County of , in the State of Firm's Complete Legal Name Check one of the following: ❑ Sole Proprietorship ❑ Corporation or P.A. ❑ Limited Partnership ❑ General Partnership Phone No. FAX No. Address City, State, ZIP BY: Typed and Written Signature Title NOTE: If you choose to bid, please submit an ORIGINAL and ONE COPY of your proposal pages. Reguest For Progmal 16B5 Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Submitted to: Oilier County Government Submitted by: DESIGNED TRAFFIC INSTILLATION Co. (A MasTec ITS Division) September 14, 2001 16B5 ' u •:- MasTec September 14, 2001 Collier County Government 3301 East Tamiami Trial General Services Building Naples, FL 34112 Re: RFP # 01 -3280 Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights Dear Gentlemen & Ladies, Designed Traffic Installation Co., an ITS division of MasTec (MasTec ITS team) welcome this opportunity to submit our proposal to furnish, install and make operational all necessary equipment and materials for the City of Naples, Collier County School District, and Collier County Government. The MasTec ITS team is exceptionally well qualified for providing the Department quality and quantity financially and efficiently because of our strong financial backing from our parent company MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) and our many years of experience in successfully completing hundreds of projects for the Departments of Transportation in several different States. The MasTec ITS team is Collier County's best choice as the firm most qualified because: • The MasTec ITS team has successfully completed similar maintenance contracts in South Florida for over 35 years. • The MasTec ITS team has successfully completed over 10 million dollars worth of Lighting related projects last year in Florida. • The MasTec team has been awarded and is currently working on over 70 million dollars in ITS related projects for the Florida DOT, Virginia DOT, Georgia DOT, North Carolina DOT, South Carolina DOT, Louisiana DOT, and Texas DOT. • The MasTec ITS team provides you with key personnel with over 135 years of combined experience in successfully providing DOTs with quality projects. • The Mastec ITS team has a local office and yard in Naples for quick response for work orders or emergencies. • MasTec ITS has key personal in Naples to make decisions to provide easier communications and implementation of the needs for the Collier County Government and Partners. The MasTec ITS team gives you a solid commitment to provide you with a quality system that will become the model for your future maintenance contracts. We are confident through our teams track record with the DOTS and Public Agencies through out the South Eastern United States that we will be able to provide you with a project you will be proud to have been associated with. Sincerely, Designed Traffic Installation Co. An ITS Divis16&of MasTec ohn P Coyne Vice President / General Manager MasTec Intelligent Traffic Services 2801 SW 46 Avenue Ft. Lauderdale Florida 33314 954.587.1700 fax 954.587.4070 www.mastec.com Des' e d TPaffne 19n, Ihstallation, COO c,- 3 s ITL`�p Florid.,--t Collier coun, ty "Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights" 16B5 Project Understanding Proposer's Credentials Resumes I Office Location and Responsiveness ........... 9 i Litigation Qualification Form Insurance, Checklist, & Declaration Statement 16B5 •:.MasTec September 13, 2001 Collier County Government 3301 East Tamiami Trial General Services Building Naples, FL 34112 Re: RFP # 01 -3280 Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights Project Understanding Dear Gentlemen & Ladies, Designed Traffic Installation Co., an ITS division of MasTec (MasTec ITS team) understands that the above mentioned project will consist of the following: • Providing Collier County and its Partners a means of establishing unit prices for the construction of Street Lights within Collier County for the basic term of two years with a two- year renewal option. • Providing Collier County and its Partners a means of a base hourly rates for labor and equipment and a material markup rate for establishing cost for items not within a unit price in the bidding documents. • Providing Collier County and its Partners a quick response for the installation of street lighting equipment within 14 calendar days of NTP for new construction. • Providing Collier County and its Partners maintenance and repair to the existing Lighting system within Collier County within 7 calendar days from NTP; except traffic signal lamps, which shall within 24 hours from NTP. • The Mastec ITS team is committed to response within (2) hours of a emergency deemed by Collier County. • The Mastec ITS team will provide the Collier County Street Lighting equipment that is compatible with Collier County Signal System, which is per the Collier County Specifications, Florida Department of Transportation's " Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, 2000" and "Minimum Specifications for Traffic Control Devices, 1999 ", Federal Highway Administration's Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2000." • Providing Collier County and its Partners any other issue such as value engineering, layout of intersection, utility coordination, scheduling, professional services and any other issue that maybe evolved with the installation of Street Lighting. Designed Traffic is fully committed to provide Collier County, City of Naples, and Collier County School District with a quality system with a quick response in installation. Sincerely, Designed Traffic Installation Co. An ITS Division of MasTec ,�.4 J ffrey M. Kleiss Senior Estimator / Project Manager MasTec Intelligent Traffic Services 2801 SW 46 Avenue Ft. Lauderdale Florida 33314 954.587.1700 fax 954.587.4070 www.mastec.com :MasTec September 13, 2001 Collier County Government 3301 East Tamiami Trial General Services Building Naples, FL 34112 Re: RFP # 01 -3280 Installation and Maintenance of Street Lighting Proposer's Credentials Dear Gentlemen & Ladies, 1685 Designed Traffic Installation Co., a ITS division of MasTec (MasTec ITS team) has been providing maintenance and construction contract since 1965. Designed Traffic has in the past (5) five years worked maintenance and construction contracts for the following government agencies: • Broward County • Palm Beach County • Martin County • St. Lucie County • Indian River County • City of Weston • City of Port St. Lucie • City of Ft. Pierce • City of Ft. Lauderdale • City of Boca Raton • FDOT District VI • FDOT District IV Designed Traffic Installation provided the above agencies with various lighting components meeting their unique specification requirements. It is our goal to please the customer or owner for repeat business in future projects. Sincerely, Designed Traffic Installation Co. An ITS Division of MasTec Jeffrey M. Kleiss Senior Estimator / Project Manager MasTec Intelligent Traffic Services 2801 SW 46 Avenue Ft. Lauderdale Florida 33314 954.587.1700 fax 954.587,4070 www.mastec.com Staff Experience MasTec Corporate Overview 1685 Establish in 1994, MasTec Synergizes the dynamic entrepreneurial spirit of Church & Tower with the experience and capabilities of a growing number of established subsidiaries to create one of the world's leading telecommunications infrastructure providers. Aggressive and fiscally conservative, competitive and innovative, MasTec is a leader in the design, construction, and maintenance of leading edge telecommunications systems that will drive the Information Age. One of the largest telecommunications services companies in the United States; MasTec is a publicly traded company (NYSE: MTZ). MasTec operates through a series of experienced, well- respected and recognized names in the telecommunications industry. As communications installation leaders, MasTec subsidiaries provide engineering, installation and maintenance services on a project basis or through master contracts with regional, long haul and competitive access telecommunications providers. MasTec sets the industry standard with turnkey LAN and WAN networks for Fortune 500 companies, and also installs state -of- the -art hybrid fiber -coax CATV networks that will bring interactive and 500- channel television to homes throughout the nation. MasTec subsidiaries are also building next - generation wireless networks for PCS and cellular companies and they enable electric utilities to become more competitive by providing cost - effective design/build transmission services. MasTec also provides similar services overseas, and is ready to serve the needs of telecommunications customers throughout the world. MasTec establishes the standard for excellence that the competition strives to match. MasTec delivers the highest quality of services because all MasTec employees are committed to solve problems creatively. Employees work together and plan for and respond enthusiastically to changing market conditions and customer needs. They perform work with a Total Quality Management and zero - defect philosophy. MasTec designs, builds, maintains and operates the networks that act as the backbone and infrastructure for telecommunications, intelligent transportation systems, and energy networks throughout North America. It is the largest service provider of its kind in North America. Headquarted in Miami, MasTec reported revenues exceeding $1 billion in 1999 and currently employs over 10,000 employees throughout North America. MasTec ITS of Florida 1685 Resume for Key Personal ➢ Mike W. Hunter, MasTec ITS Experience: • 1998 — Mike W. Hunter is responsible for overall operation of MasTec ITS Division of MasTec (formally M. E. Hunter & Associates, Inc. in Georgia, Virginia, South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana and North Carolina and Designed Traffic Installation's Florida operations). • 1994 — 1998 President of M. E. Hunter and Associates • 1984 — 1994 Project Manager with M. E. Hunter for various Intelligent Transportation System project within the Southeast United States. Education: • 1978 — 1982: Clemson University — Bachelor in Science Degree in Financial Management John P. Coyne, Designed Traffic Installation Co: Experience: • 1998 — current: Vice President of Designed Traffic Installation ❑ Managed all Guardrail, Attenuators, Signing, Signalization, Lighting, and Intelligent Transportation Systems Operations in Florida ❑ Oversees the Estimating and Project Management, Purchasing, Field Operations, Scheduling, and Accounting Departments • 1997 — 1998: Part Owner, Project Manager, and Estimator for Signal Services ❑ Managed the Office, Estimating, Job Costing, Purchasing, Accounting, and Operations • 1990 — 1997: Florida General Manager for Transportation Safety Contractor's ❑ Managed all Guardrail, Attenuators, Signing, Signalization, Lighting, and Intelligent Transportation Systems Operations in South Florida • 1974 —1990: South Florida General Manager and Vice President for Mike Hunter Inc. ❑ Managed all Guardrail, Attenuators, Signing, Signalization, Lighting, and Intelligent Transportation Systems Operations in Florida ❑ Oversaw the Estimating and Project Management Departments Education: • 1971— 1974: Slippery Rock University — Majored in Sociology • 1981 -1982: Broward Community College — Continuing Education Licenses: • Certificate of Competency — Miami -Dade — Fence and Guardrail • Certificate of Competency — Miami -Dade — Signing ➢ Dave Devin, Designed Traffic Installation Co: Experience: • 1998 — current: Project Manager for Designed Traffic Installation ❑ Manages over 20 million in Signalization, Lighting, Signing, and Guardrail projects • 1997 — 1998: Project Manager for Signal Services ❑ Managed the Job Costing, Purchasing, and Operations • 1994 — 1997: South Florida Project Manager for Transportation Safety Contractor's ❑ Managed all Guardrail, Attenuators, Signing, Signalization, Lighting, and Intelligent Transportation Systems Operations in South Florida • 1989 —1994: Owned and Operated Private Business • 1980 —1989: Managed Retail Store • 1974 — 1980: South Florida Project Manager and Superintendent for Mike Hunter Inc. MasTec ITS of Florida 16B5 ❑ Managed and supervised Guardrail, Attenuators, Signing, Signalization, Lighting, and Intelligent Transportation Systems Operations in South Florida Education: • 1969 — 1974: Slippery Rock University — Majored in Secondary Education Licenses: • ASSTA Worksite Safety Supervisor - # 55570 ➢ Jeffrey M. Kleiss, Designed Traffic Installation Co: Experience: • 1996 — current: Senior Estimator and Project Manager for formally Designed Traffic Installation ❑ Oversees estimating department with over 100 million in estimates ❑ Oversees Design -Build and Intelligent Transportation Systems Projects ❑ Manages over 10 million in Signalization, Lighting, Signing, and Guardrail projects • 1993 —1996: Supervisor and Foreman overseeing projects under a million Education: • 1996 — 2000: Florida International University — Construction Management Engineering B.S. Degree • 1992 —1996: Broward Community College — Associates in Arts • 1994 -1998: Florida Department of Labor — Completion of Apprenticeship as an Electrician. Licenses: • Certified General Contractor - # CGC 061236 • Certified Electrical Contractor — # CEC 0002274 • Journeyman Electrician ( Broward County) - # 97 -CJE- 3714 -X • IMSA Traffic Signal Electrician Level II - # BE21042 • IMSA Traffic Signal Technician Level I - # AA21042 • IMSA Traffic Work Zone Safety Specialist - # ZZ24122 ➢ Tim Malone, Designed Traffic Installation Co: Experience: • 1999 — Current: ITS Technical Director MasTec ITS division and Designed Traffic Installation Co. ❑ System Design for ITS projects ❑ Integration for ITS projects • 1998 —1999: Owner of Intelligent Transportation Services, Inc. • Technical management on Computerized Freeway and Traffic Systems • System Design for ITS projects • Integration for ITS projects • 1990 — 1998: Project Manager for surveillance systems for Traffic Control Devices, Inc. • 1985 — 1990: Vice President of Software Development for Lake Technologies ❑ Software specifications and design ❑ Estimating projects ❑ Purchasing ❑ Instructor for software training • 1983 — 1985: Field Engineer for Traffic Control Devices, Inc. ❑ Integration of 68 Variable Message Signs in Arlington, VA • 1982 — 1983: Systems Programmer for Fosco Electronics, Inc MasTec ITS of Florida 1685 Education: • 1989 — Current: Stetson University — seeking Masters of Business Administration Degree • 1978 — 1982 — Southern Illinois University — B.S. in Computer Science with a minor in mathematics Licenses: • IMSA Traffic Signal Electrician Level II • IMSA Traffic Signal Technician Level I • IMSA Traffic Work Zone Safety Specialist John Mader, Designed Traffic Installation Co: Experience: • 1999 — 2000: Superintendent for MasTec ITS of Florida, Inc. (formally Designed Traffic Installation) • Oversees field operations in Broward County • Oversees ITS projects • Oversees equipment scheduling for the state of Florida • 1994 — 1999: Broward County Supervisor for various projects with MasTec ITS of Florida, Inc. (formally Designed Traffic Installation) ❑ Oversees various Signal, Lighting, and Signing projects within Broward County ❑ Oversees three to five field crews with various tasks • 1987 —1994: Signal Technician and Foreman for the Signalization Crew with MasTec ITS of Florida, Inc. (formally Designed Traffic Installation) Education: • 1987 -1991: Florida Department of Labor — Completion of Apprenticeship as an Electrician. Licenses: • IMSA Traffic Signal Electrician Level II - # BE20354 • IMSA Traffic Signal Technician Level I - # IGO- 0083 -A201 • Journeyman Electrician ( Broward County) - # 91 -CJE- 2691 -X • Journeyman Electrician (Palm Beach County) - • Journeyman Electrician (Dade County) — T9717844 James Coleman, Designed Traffic Installation Co: Experience: • 2000 — Current: Superintendent Collier County Operations for Designed Traffic Installation ➢ Oversees Scheduling Crews for Collier County ❑ Oversees Signing, Guardrail, Attenuator, Lighting and Signalization Crews for Collier County • 2000 -1995: Superintendent South Florida Operations for Signal Service Ind. ❑ Oversaw Scheduling Crews for South Florida ❑ Oversaw Signing, Lighting and Signalization Crews for South Florida • 1995 — 1992: Supervisor for American Lighting ❑ Oversaw New Signal Installations during Hurricane Andrew Disaster Relief ❑ Oversaw 50 Buckets and 25 Crew for Hurricane Andrew Disaster Relief • 1992 —1991: Forman for Transportation Control Devices ❑ Oversaw Signing, Lighting, and Signalization Crews for South /Central Florida • 1990 — 1989: Forman for Transportation Safety ❑ Oversaw Signing, Lighting, and Signalization Crews for South Florida. • 1989 — 1982: Laborer for Transportation Control Devices ❑ Worked on Metro Rail and Traffic Signal Systems. Installed Aerial Interconnect System for Central Florida Licenses: • IMSA Signing and Marking Level I MasTec ITS of Florida 1685 • IMSA Safety in Work Place — Z21109 • IMSA Signal Electrician Level I - #AA20656 • IMSA Signal Electrician Level II — BE20656 • Control Tech Factor Rep. • Master 30 Hour OSHA Certified Padro Hernandez, Designed Traffic Installation Co. Experience: • 2000 — Current: Foreman for Designed Traffic Installation Co. ❑ Oversees Signing, Lighting, Guardrail and Signalization Crews for Collier County projects • 2000 — 1998: Forman for Signal Services Ind. ❑ Oversaw Signing, Lighting, and Signalization Crews for South Florida ❑ Oversaw Three to Five Crews with various tasks • 1998 — 1994: Forman for American Lighting ❑ Oversaw various Signal, Lighting, and Signing projects for South Florida ❑ Oversaw Three to Five Field Crews with Various Tasks • 1994 — 1992: Forman for Traffic Signal Inc. ❑ Oversaw various Signal, Lighting, and Signing projects for South Florida ❑ Oversaw Three to Five Field Crews with Various Tasks • 1992 —1984: Forman for Transportation Control Devices ❑ Oversaw various Signal, Lighting, and Signing projects for South Florida ❑ Oversaw Three to Five Field Crews with Various Tasks • 1984 — 1981: Forman for Signal Group ❑ Oversaw various Signal, Lighting, and Signing projects for South Florida ❑ Oversaw Three to Five Field Crews with Various Tasks Education: • Bucket Truck Certified • Boom Truck Certified • Safety In The Work Place Licenses • IMSA Traffic Signal Technician Level I Wesley Harold, Designed Traffic Installation Co. Experience: • 2001— Current: Foreman for Designed Traffic Installation Co. ❑ Oversees Signing, Lighting, Guardrail and Signalization Crews for Collier County projects ❑ Oversees Three to Five Field Crews with Various Tasks • 2000 —1999: Self Employed • 1999 —1995: Forman for Designed Traffic Installation Co. • Oversaw various Signal, Lighting, and Signing projects for South Florida • Oversaw Three to Five Field Crews with Various Tasks • 1995 —1993: Operator for Danella ❑ Operated Back Hoe, Crane Education • IMSA Traffic Signal Technician Level I • IMSA Traffic Signal Technician Level II • Safety In The Work Place • Directional Drill Certified MasTec ITS of Florida DESIGNED TRAFFIC INSTALLATION COMPANY 16B5 LICENSE LISTING EMPLOYEE NAME LIC. State EC or GC# Elec.JE# IMSA Level -1 IMSA Level -2 IMSA Level -3 IMSA Rd.Ltg. IMSA Wrk Zn ATSSA Factory Rep. Sign mrking ACI Concrete NSC CPR- Course NSC FirstAld OJT Sig /Inst. ADAY. JAVIER CDL A ANDERSON, SIMROY CDL B /BRK AA 21527 ZZ26190 471843 174800 Jan -01 ARCELO,RUDOLFO CDLA ARENAS, OTMARO CDLA ZZ27186 AREVALO, EDUVIGES CDLB ARMSTRONG,EDWARD CDLA AUGUSTIN, PROSPHERE CDLB BALDELOMAR, FRANCISCO CDLA AA 21238 BE 211238 ZZ24957 BELL, WILLIE CDL B BETHEL, JAMAL CDL A BLAIN,PHITO ZZ68500 BLANCO, SALVADOR D ZZ68506 BROWN, GAEKWAD CDL B ZZ68508 471841 174799 BRYAN. DENIS CDL B A20412 BE 20412 YES BRZUZIWSKI, DOUGLAS CDL C AA21342 BE213421 ZZ26046 EE20995 CABEZAS, ROMAN CDL B CARR, SEAN CDLA AA 21470 BE 31773 ZZ26088 38646 CARRANZA, ORLANDO CDLA CAULKETT, DAVID E A 21117 BE 21117 Z24847 I YES CHERISME, CLEDOR CDLA CLARKE,ALPHANSO CDL A/BRK AA 21324 BE 21324 Z724962 471839 174798 COLEMAN, JAMES CDLB AA 20656 BE 20656 1 Z 21109 55743 COLLINS, JOHN CDL A/BRK AA 21326 LEVEL II ZZ24963 471837 174797 CRAGER, FRANK CDL A/BRK 471835 174796 CRUZ, MARCOS CDLA ZZ68512 CRYER, JOHN CDLB AA 21206 BE 21206 1 ZZ25275 1 1 55727 DEL VALLE, RAYMOND CDL A DENIZAT, ERNELUS CDL B DESLIS, ANGEL CDLB DESMANGLES,ENAL ZZ68514 DEVIN, DAVE D 55570 DIEGUE, RAOUL CDLB DI MANTINO, ANTHONY CDLB DILBERT, ALLAN CDLA LEVEL I LEVEL II DOR,YVES CDLA ELLIS, ROBERT M CDLA LEVEL] ELVIR, OSCAR CDLB FERNANDEZ,ERNESTO CDLB ZZ68518 FERNANDEZ,FERNANDO CDLA FOSTER, WILLIE CDLB FOXX, ROGER CDLB AA21533 38646 FRANCO, DIEGO CDLB ZZ24117 FRYE, YOLANDA CDL B/WTR ZZ24977 GALINDO, JESUS CDL A GOMEZ, ARDANY CDL B GONZALES, PEDRO CDL A GOODIN, CORNELIUS ZZ68520 GRAMMER, DUSTIN COLA ZZ27189 HERNANDEZ, JUAN CDLA HERNANDEZ,OSCAR CDLA HERNANDEZ, PEDRO CDLA HERRERA,REYBER CDLA HINOJOSA, PEDRO CDLA JACQUES, JODIE CDLA A 20660 BE 206601 1 Z20739 38646 JAMES, CHRISTIE CDL C JANVIER, JOSEPH CDLA JEAN, JOSEPH CDLB JOHNSON, DAVID CDLA AA21330 BE21330 ZZ249821 1 1 471836 174794 JOHNSON,SAMMY CDLA KELL, TIM CDLB KLEISS, JEFFREY CDLA CGC- 061236 EC000227, AA 21042 BE 21042 ZZ24122 LATIMORE, MICHELLE CDLB LAURISTON, CHARLES ZZ68524 LINARES, ANGEL CDL B AA 21332 1 ZZ25678 LOUIS, ANDRIS CDL B MADER, JOHN CDL B 91CJE2691 LEVEL I BE 20354 MAIRENA, JUAN CDLA 1 471838 174793 MAJEED,ABDOOL CDLB MAJEWSKI, PATRICIA E ZZ24123 McCOY, TIMOTHY CDLA A 20163 BE 20163 17799 38646 McCOY, FRANK E 85CJE2005 A 20162 820162 YES McCRAY, JOHNNY CDLB MEDINA, ERNESTO E 471834 174792 MENDEZ, JOSE CDLA MENMIPA.�turtificatiO S CDL A / 13/2001 DESIGNED TRAFFIC INSTALLATION COMPANY 1685LICENSE LISTING EMPLOYEE NAME LIC. State EC or GC# Elec.JE# IMSA Level -1 IMSA Level -2 IMSA Level -3 IMSA Rd.Ltg. IMSA Wrk Zn ATSSA Factory Rep. Sign mrking ACI Concrete NSC CPR- Course NBC FirstAid OJT Sig /Inst. MITCHELL, GEORGE CDL A MOISE, JEAN CDL B AA21170 BE21170 RR27004 ZZ24993 471832 174791 MONTANO. FERNANDO CDL B ZZ68527 MOORE, RICHARD CDL A MORENO, FREDRICO CDL A MOSLEY, WILLIAM CDL B MULGRAVE, DAVID CDL B ZZ68528 NELSON, BOBBY CDL B PAGUDA, OSCAR CDLA ZZ68529 PEDERSEN, CHARLES CDLA EC- A000769 AA 20329 BE 20329 YES 55571 DO 20109 PENA, FELIX CDLA PEREZ, CARLOS CDL B AA21165 ZZ25020 PEREZ, FELIX CDL B PEREZ, FERNANDO CDLA PEREZ, JORGE FELIX CDL 8 PEREZ, JOSE CDL B PEREZ, JUAN CARLOS CDL A PETERSON, THOMAS CDL B PHILIPPE, ERNILUTE CDL B PINEIRO,RICARDO CDLA PITTMAN, WILLIAM CDL B PIWARONAS, PAUL CDLA POLANIN, GARY CDL B A20661 BE 20661 Z20743 46646 YES PRATTS, BRADLEY CDL WBRK AA 21335 BE 21335 ZZ25685 RACHEL, TYSON CDLA/BRK ? ?? I I YES REDDIE, HORACE E ZZ27331 REMINGTON, RICHARD 055736 RIVELLO, BRIAN CDLA RIVIERO, RENE CDLA RODRIGUEZ, LUC ZZ68530 SANCHEZ, VINCE CDL B 97CJE3557 AA 21047 BE 21047 ZZ24128 471840 174790 SANTANA,RUPERTO CDLA SANTIESTEBAN, JOSE ZZ68531 SANTIESTEBAN, RAFAEL JF CDL B ZZ68532 SANTIESTEBAN, RAFAEL SF D ZZ68562 SCHMITT, JAMES CDL B SEXTON, KEVIN D 01 -02066 AA 21531 ZZ27193 SHEA, ED CDL A/BRK A 20662 BE 20662 SIMPKIN, TODD CDLA I A21049 BE 21049 SOPER, TROY CDL B SORRENTO, VINCE COL B SPACE, SHAWN CDLA STEWART, MAURICE CDL B STEWART, SHELDON CDL B /BR STOTLER, RANDY CDL B AA 21338 BE 21338 ZZ256 TATRO, GENE CDL B I ZZ68535 TAYLOR, VILMA D TEAGUE,ALONZO CDLB THOMAS, PHILLIP CDLA TIRSE, EUSEBIO CDLA AA 21339 TURENE, NICOLAS CDL B VERA,CARLOS CDLA WEISBROT, BETH NONE ZZ68536 471842 174789 WILSON, LAVERNE CDL B WOJCICKI, JOHN CDL B WRIGHT, NORMAN CDL B A20157 B20157 LEVEL III 13490 WRIGHT, Wm DAVIE D empdata- certifications 9/13/2001 :4asTec REFERENCES Broward County Traffic Engineering 2300 W. Commercial Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Murali Pasumarthi (954) 484 -9600 Annual Signalization Contract Martin County Board of County Commissioners 2401 SE Monterey Road Stuart, FL 34996 Debbie Jordan (561) 288 -5465 Annual Traffic Signalization Contract Indian River Traffic Engineering 2625 19`h Avenue Vero Beach, FL 32960 Chris Mora (561) 567 -8000 X234 Annual Signalization Contract St. Lucie County 3071 Oleander Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Gene Snedeker (561) 462 -2848 Annual Signalization and Lighting Contract City of Fort Lauderdale 100 North Andrews Avenue Sixth Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Paul Gayle (954) 761 -5760 Annual Street Light Pole Contract Florida Department of Transportation District VI 1655 NE 105th Terrace Miami, FL 33179 Nancy Lyons (305) 650 -0004 Signalization and Lighting Contract 1665 Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering 160 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Rebecca Mulchaey (561) 684 -4030 Annual Signalization and Traffic Contract City of Port St. Lucie 121 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd. Port St. Lucie, FL 34984 Kimberly Graham (561) 871 -5525 Annual Signalization and Lighting Contract City of Weston 2500 Weston Road, Suite 101 Weston, FL 33331 Victor Bgahat (954) 921 -7781 Group One Signal System City of Ft. Pierce 100 North US 1 Fort Pierce, FL 34954 Jack Andrews (561) 460 -2200 Traffic Signal Maintenance Contract City of Boca Raton 201 W. Palmetto Park Road Boca Raton, FL 33432 Namadeem (561) 416 -3387 Annual Signalization Contract Florida Department of Transportation District IV 3400 W. Commercial Blvd. Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33409 Liz Holmes (954) 777 -4650 Signalization and Lighting Contract o MasTec Intelligent Traffic Services 2801 SW 46 Avenue Ft. Lauderdale Florida 33314 ��954.587.1700 fax 954.587.4070 www.mastec.com 1685 :MasTec September 13, 2001 Collier County Government 3301 East Tamiami Trial General Services Building Naples, FL 34112 Re: RFP # 01 -3280 Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights Office Location Dear Gentlemen & Ladies, Designed Traffic Installation Co., an ITS division of MasTec (MasTec ITS team) has a yard at 35 -57 Prospect Avenue, Naples, FL 34104, which is located off of Airport - Pulling Road in a close proximately to Collier County Traffic Engineering and the City of Naples Traffic Engineering. Designed Traffic feels we can respond in a timely manner throughout the County due to our centrally located yard. Sincerely, Designed Traffic Installation Co. An ITS Division of MasTec Jeffrey M. Kleiss Senior Estimator / Project Manager MasTec Intelligent Traffic Services 2801 SW 46 Avenue Ft. Lauderdale Florida 33314 954.587.1700 fax 954.587.4070 www.mastec.com DESIGNED TRAFFIC INSTALLATION COMPANY EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE LIST BYASSET NUMBER 1685 a F YEAR KE EL DESCRIPTION EXPIRES VEHICLE SERIAU ID # YARD ACTUAL WT. G,V.W.R. 04401 1989 rd G FAItec 0 Truck Pick-up 1-V Jun -02 1FTDF15Y1KNB43629 F.L. 3560 NA 06381 1988 50 lF.. Truck Bucket N A 088741526 F.L. 06459 1987 rd 00 Truck. Crane NU810px 9B Dec -01 1FDPT84A9HV163406 F.L. 43999 06912 19811Ford B Truck Bucket D Dec -01 DPF82H3BVJ42873 DADE 25999 06922! 1985 Ford 00 Truck Pie B Dec -01 1FDNF60HIFVA06166 DADE 34999 06923 1985 Ford F -600 Truck, Dump B Dec -01 1FDNF60H5FVA06168 F.L. 34999 08940 1991 Butler Trailer PX Jun -02 1BUD12207M1009220 DADE 700 12065 1995 Vermeer 4750 Trencher NIA NIA 1VRL082P941000415 P.B. 12364 1979 Bame Trailer XWS90V Jun -02 9792687 P.B. 5500 14034 1997 Ford D F -350 Truck Loop Floater VRY77U Dec -01 1FTJW35F6VEA16084 F.P. 5578 24999 14035 1997 Ford D F -350 Truck. Loop Diego VGC72Z Dec-01 1FTJW35F4VEA17816 F.L. 5578 24999 14036 1996 Ford F -350 Truck Flatbed Auggie E35FRD Dec -01 1FDJF37F8TEB24406 F.L. NA 14500 14037 1996 Ford F -350 Truck Loop E36FRD Dec -01 1FDJF37F6TEB24405 P.B. N/A 14500 14038 1995 !Ford F-800/1-13650 Truck Bucket Brad M2957B Dec -01 1FDPF8OC7SVA77613 F.L. 6649 34999 14502 1992 iJohn Deere 310 -D Backhoe JUNK N/A N/A 787463 F.L. N/A NIA 15549 1972 1 Pittman N/A Trailer Pole N/A I D30NVA Jun -02 412 F.P. 3280 N/A 15550 1972 Ferre N/A Trailer N/A D31NVA Jun -02 723603 P.B. 2975 N/A 15551 1974 Ferre N/A Trailer N/A D32NVA Jun -02 734288 F.L. 2975 NIA 15552 1962 Homemade Trailer Cable D33NVA Jun -02 NOVIN000090287113 DADE 1500 15553 1970 Homemade Trailer A460UX Jun -02 3T73159 P.B. 1300 15555 1972 Pittman Trailer, Pale F77DXV Jun -02 419 F.L. 4060 15556 19891 Interstate Intemational Trailer D90VIP Jun -02 1JKDTM291KA600392 DADE 5600 15557 1988 1 Eager Beaver Trailer D91VIP Jun -02 1120BD206JS060016 F.L. 5600 155601 19951Vermeer V -8550 Trencher N/A N/A VRK11248510043 F.L. 15561 1986 Berne N/A Trailer N/A B33EFL Dec -01 1695DO921GSO26076 F.L. N/A 20000 15562 1989 Ford F -700 Truck Pie N/A M1225S Dec -01 1 FDNK74P2KVA20624 DADE N/A 43999 15563 1 19951Ford Big Blue Truck Auger Yolanda Frye U1027G Jun -02 1FDYL90EOSVA52773 F.L. 12325 N/A 15564, 1995 Bobcat 753 Skid Loader N/A N/A N/A 720015 F.L. N/A N/A 15565! 1990 (Ford F -800 Truck Auger N/A U0706G Jun -02 1FDXK84A7LVA13955 F.L. 24680 NIA 155661 1995 Custom NIA ITrailer, Cable N/A D34NVA Jun -02 233 F.P. 1700 N/A 155671 1995 Sullivan N/A Air Compressor N/A EE716T Jun -02 12252 F.P. 1640 N/A 155681 1995 Sullivan N A Air Compressor N/A 1 D870XT Jun -02 12258 DADE 1 1640 NIA 155691 1995 Ford F -350 Truck, Dump N/A DSOSJV Dec -01 1FDKF37H6SNB50541 P.B. 7000 25999 155701 1995 Ford F -350 Truck Flatbed NA E23FRD Dec -01 1FDKF37H5SNB50529 P.B. 6560 25999 15571 � 1995 Ford F -350 Truck Flatbed Floater E57FQL Dec -01 1FDKF37H1SNB61057 F.L. 6680 25999 15573 1995 !Bobcat 7436 Skid Loader Rick Remington N/A N/A N/A DADE N/A N/A 15574 19901Ford F -800 Truck Dump N/A M2951B Dec -01 1FDPK84P4LVA39627 F.L. 13000 43999 15575 1990 !Ford F -800 Truck Dump N/A M1980S I Dec -01 1FDPK84P9LVA40286 P.B. 13600 43999 15576 1995 1 Ford G F -250 Truck Utilitv Sheldon Stewart E24FRD Dec -01 2FTHF25H8SCA76993 F.L. 5920 19999 15579 1989 Case N/A Forklift N/A N/A N/A JJG0067884 F.L. ? ? 15580 N/A Allis Chamber N/A Forklift NIA N/A NIA 5- 8629 -D DADE ? 9 155821 1995 Homemade N/A Trailer Cable NIA D35NVA Jun -02 NOVIN000091819568 P.B. 1700 N/A 15583'.1993 Ford Taurus Car/Estimating ? E31VXY Jun -02 1FACP52U5PA303923 F.L. 3003 N/A 15584 1995 Vermeer D -24 Navigator D. Grammer D36NVA Jun -02 1VRL24238S1000489 F.L. 6000 N/A 155851 1995 Solar Technolo N/A Arrow Board NIA F76DXV Jun -02 AB1515500236 DADE 1200 1200 155861 1995 Solar Technolo N/A Arrow Board N/A D0781Z Jun -02 AB1515500237 F.L. N/A 1200 1995 Altec LB650 Truck Bucket N/A M1262S Dec -01 1FDPF8OC8SVA69512 DADE 6649 34999 15586 1995AItec LB650 Truck Bucket N/A M2959B Dec -01 1FDPF80C1SVA69514 P.B. N/A 34999 15599 1987 Ford F -700 Truck Dump N/A M1224S Dec -01 1FDNF70HXHVA03775 F.P. 10760 43999 15600 19861Ford F -350 Truck Dump N/A A53TEG Dec -01 IFDJF37HXGNA17638 F.L. 7240 10001 15601 1968 IGind N/A Trailer Storage N/A NIA N/A 49986 F.L. 9000 N/A 15602 19871Ford F -350 Truck Flatbed Floater E80NSM Dec -01 2FDKF37LOHCA48977 F.L. 10060 10060 15605 1983 !Ford F -700 Truck Crane N/A M0384S Dec -01 1FDPF70H8DVA44179 F.L. 19260 43999 15611 19831Ford F -800 Truck Auger N/A i U1043G Jun -02 IFDPF82H6DVA23687 DADE 6768 N/A 15613 19881Ford F -250 Truck Utility Rich Moore D52THX Jun -02 IFTEF25H3JNBO2735 DADE 3974 N/A 15614 1988 (Ford Super Duty Truck. Flatbed JUNK A52TEG Dec -01 2FDLF47G3JCA62326 F.L. N/A 14500 15615 1989 ]Ford Super Duty Truck Dump N/A GH149A Dec -01 2FDLF47M3KCA57201 P.B. 7730 14500 15616 1989 Ford Su er Duty Truck Dump Tim Kell D40GCQ Dec -01 2FDLF47M6KCA64420 F.L. 7830 14500 15618 1989 Chevrolet S -10 Truck Crew Cab Loop Crew A89GDB Jun -02 1GCBS14E3K2264819 P.B. 1 2509 N/A 15619 1990 Ford Super Du Truck Dump N/A D41GCQ Dec -01 2FD1-F47M1LCA28314 DADE 7680 14500 15620 19901Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-Up Francisco D98ONJ Jun -02 1FTEF25Y5LNB22956 DADE 3866 N/A 15622 1990'Ford D F -600 Truck Dump N/A VRZ45H Dec -01 1FDNF60H9LVA01311 F.L. 6200 21200 1562511992 Ford F-7001LB650 Truck Bucket N/A M7087A Dec -01 11FDPK74P6NVA07694 F.P. 18140 26500 1562611992 Ford F -350 ITruck, UtilitV LaVerne VRZ43H Dec -01 IIFDJF37YlNNA72606 F.L. 5780 10001 15627 1992 Ford G F -150 Truck Pick -Up Junk XWS188 Jun -02 11FTEF15Y8NNA97709 F.P. 3842 15629'1965 International Truck Auger M9162R Dec -01 952312020 F.L 43999 15631 1980 Ford F -800 Truck Pie M1206S Dec -01 F82KVJH0866 DADE 43999 15633 1992 Isuzu Truck Pick-Up DR377M Jun -02 4S1CL11L4N4229373 F.L. 2635 15635 1985 Ford F -800 Truck Pipe M1229S Dec -01 1FDNF70HXFVA16362 P.B. 108201 43999 15640 199411suzu Q -16 Truck Pick-up JUNK A45OUX Jun -00 JAACLI I L5R7209068 F.L 2760 15642 1994 iFord D F -350 Truck Loop PhiWoDe GH150A Dec -01 1FTJW35M4REA17867 F.L. 25999 15643 1994 Ford / Pitman F -700 IRO Truck Crane t Pierce Ed Shei M7996B Dec -01 1 FDXK74C6RVA34767 F.P. 43999 15644 1994 !Ford F -700 Truck Dump M1228S Dec -01 1FDNF70J3RVAO3427 DADE 43999 15645 1993'!Peachstate Trailer Mobile N/A N/A PSHGA 13423 F.L. 15646 1991 .'International Truck. Dump M2958B Dec -01 1HTSCNMP8MH380946 F.L. 43999 1564711988 1 Ford F -450 Truck Utility JUNK GH151A Dec -01 2FDLF47MXJCB23550 JAX 1 25999 15648'1995 Ford F -800 LB65 Truck Bucket M1 227S Dec -01 1FDPF8005SVA32207 P.B. 34999 156491 1973 Roger Trailer D54GCQ Dec -01 D3735 F.L. 3735 15719 Vermeer Trencher N N/A DADE 15720 1 1982 Ea er Beaver Trailer U82DPX Jun -02 20BD303CA090033 F.P. 4600 15721 1983 IHomemade Trailer Cable D97QXW Jun -02 NOVIN000080373022 P.B. 810 15725 19851Grove Truck Crane UT OF SERVIC U0709G Jun -02 APlXX22001W F.L. 50000 50000 15726. 19951 Hobart Welder N/A N/A JF957496 F.L. 15730 1987 !Road Hog Trailer D17XBA Dec -01 8702 DADE 5000 15731 1975 omemade Trailer Cable D39NVA Jun -02 NOVIN000081163191 DADE 1500 15733 1 Eager Beaver Roller N/A N/A 8117 -0 F.L. 15734 ��. 1969 Atlas Co co Air Compressor NONE RC30175 F.L. 15735 1989 Air Com ressor D40NVA Jun -02 12512689 F.L. 1360 15736 NOT WORKING Saw Concrete I I N/A N/A 65445 F.L. w - hsmvztatejtus REVISED 9/19/7001 DESIGNED TRAFFIC ILE LIST SYASCOMPANY 1685 EOUIPMEN7AND VEHICLE LIST BYASSET NUMBER F 1Y EAR MAKE MODEL DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED TAG# EXPIRES VEHICLE SERIAL/ ID # YARD ]ACTUAL WT. G.V.W.R. 15738 1973 Trailer Cable A88GDB Jun -02 TT12411 211 F.L. 400 157401 ITaraet Pro 35 II Saw Loop Broken Dow N/A F.L. 15741 1991 Yale N- 497616 Forklift N/A N/A GP060TENUAV095 F.P. 15742 1991 Homemade Trailer D88QXT Jun -02 NOVIN000082177979 F.L. 440 15743 1992 1 Mustang Trailer WRI19J Jun -02 PHDT3223AO114 JAX 4800 15704 1984 Grimmer Air Com ressor WRI16J Jun -02 8516 F.L. 1625 15746 7992 case 860 Trencher N/A N/A N/A JAF0105001 DADE 157471 1992 1 Ditch Witch 6510 Trencher N/A N/A 655549 F.L. 15748 19921 Trailer Mobile N/A N/A CFL 462 F.L. 2500 157501 1992 Case 1845C Skid Loader N/A N/A N/A 101664 P.B. 15751 1992 Case 860 Trencher N/A N/A NIA JAF0105042 F.P. N/A N/A 15752 1993 IMiller Mi N/A Welder N/A N/A N/A 8141 -0 F.L. N/A N/A 15755 1989 In ersol N/A Air Compressor N/A DQ78OZ Jun -02 173857U89172 DADE 2300 N/A 15756 N/A Target N/A Arrow Board N/A N/A N/A 8145 -0 F.L. N/A N/A 15758 1993 (Case 1840C I Skid Loader Rick Remington N/A NIA JAF0120649 DADE N/A N A 15759 N/A IN /A N/A Trailer Storage N/A NIA N/A 689078 F.L. NIA N/A 15760 1993iMas Co co N/A Air Compressor N/A DQ779Z Jun -02 HOL600355 F.L. 2944 N/A 15761 1993 (Atlas Copco N/A Air Compressor N/A D0778Z Jun -02 HOL600622 P.B. 2944 N/A 15762 N/A John Deere N/A Air Compressor N/A 8154 -0 F.L. 15763 1994 HOMEMADE N/A Trailer N/A F60DXY Jun -02 NOVIN000082752051 F.L. 1780 N/A 15764 1994 Homemade N/A Trailer N/A A86GDB Jun -02 NOVIN000082752050 F.L. 1780 N/A 15765 1992 no N/A Trailer NIA WRIO6J Jun -02 PHDT3223A0244 F.L. 5000 18000 15766 1963 "GONE" Trailer RIA26Z Jun -99 1DS0000E8D1014056 F.L. 15767 1963 1Chal N/A Trailer Pole N/A XWE39V Dec -01 63085417 F.L. N/A N/A 15768 1987 STBI NIA Trailer Pole N/A A85GDB Jun -02 SB9151314HTSB9065 P.B. 3680 N/A 15769 1994 IVermeer TC4 ITrench Wheel Comp. N/A N/A N/A 482962 F.L. 15770 1994 Target Pro 35 11 Saw Loo N/A N/A N/A (Title #C80060 F.L. N/A N/A 15771 1994 Target Pro 35 11 Saw Loo N/A N/A N/A 184055 F.L. N/A N/A 15772 1994 Target Pro 35 11 Saw Loop NIA N/A N/A 184281 F.L. NIA N/A 15774 1994 John Deere 300D Backhoe N/A N/A N/A 797192 F.L. NIA N/A 15775 1994 Homemade N/A Trailer. Cable N/A D27 IIY Jun -02 FLT1049GG DADE 2340 N/A 15776 1994 Homemade N/A Trailer Cable N/A A83GDB Jun -02 FLT1050GG P.B. 2380 N/A 15762 1994 Target "GONE" Saw Loo NIA N/A F.L. 15783 1989 Gardner Denv D0190JD7A Air Compressor NIA XIW80S Jun -02 1903534 F.L. 1480 N/A 15784 7989 Gardner Denv 8176 -0 Air Compressor A82GDB Jun -02 1901345 F.L. 1640 15785 1984 Vermeer Concrete Mixer N A NIA N/A F.L. 15787 1987' .Ditch Witch 3210 Trencher N/A N/A N/A 343330 F.L. N/A NIA 15788, Ditch Witch 3210 Trencher N/A N/A 343336 F.L. 158051 19961Target Pro 3511 Saw Loop NIA N/A N/A 230110 F.L. N/A N/A 158061 1996 1 Target Pro 3511 Saw Loo N/A N/A N/A 230111 F.L. N/A N/A 158"96 Ford G F -150 Truck Pick-up Todd Simpkins D751HL Jun -02 2FTEF15YSTCA27104 F.L. 3926 N/A 15806 1996 Homemade N/A lTrailer, Tar of N/A D92VIP Jun -02 NOVIN000083330062 F.P. 1820 N/A 15864 1981 Fontain N/A ITraier N/A E34FRD Dec -01 13N1452C6K1545271 F.L. N/A N/A 16026 1996 Homemade N/A Trailer Welding N/A D96VIP Jun -02 NOVIN000083407531 F.L. 1240 N/A 160271 1996 Homemade N/A Trailer Cable N/A I T39MRP Jun -02 NOVIN000083330061 JAX 960 N/A 16G981 1996 Vermeer TC4 Trench Wheel Comp. N/A N/A I N/A 1VRF082Y5T1000781 F.L. NIA N/A ? I Stone 6 -CM Concrete Mixer— N/A N/A F.L. 1616411995 Ford F -800 LB65 Truck Bucket Denis M1221S Dec -01 IFDPF80C7SVA78752 F.L. 6649 34999 ? Water Tank— N/A N/A F.L. 16274 19951Ford LB650 Truck Bucket Lance M7906B Dec -01 1FDPF80C7SVA78749 F.L. N/A 43999 16275.1995 Ford LB650 Truck Bucket NIA M79846 Dec -01 1FDPF80C3SVA78750 F.P. 6649 34999 16925 1995 IFord F -350 Truck Flatbed Vinnie Sorentino XIW79S Dec -01 J8DC4B1 K5S7007256 F.L. 14200 20000 17552 1996 Vermeer V -8550 Trencher NIA N/A N/A 1 V R K1 1224XT1 000484 F.P. N/A N/A 17668 1997 IHomemade Tar Pot Trailer Tar of NIA I E68MOZ Jun -02 I NOVIN000083639449 P.B. 1460 N/A 17985 1997 "Ford G F -150 Truck Pick-up Dave Devin WRG48G Jun -02 1FTDF1724VNC97135 F.L. 3795 5550 18072. 1997 'Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up D. Johnson WRN34T Jun -02 1FTHF25G6VE891436 F.L. 4641 8600 18073 1997 Ford G F -250 Truck. Pick-up Junk Sean Car WRN33T Jun -02 1FTHF25G2VEB91434 F.L. 4641 180791 1997 Core Cut N/A Saw Loop N/A N/A N/A 1257401 F.L. N/A N/A 18267 1990 Ford 80OBT Truck Crane N/A N4715A Dec -01 1FDPF82K6LVA47546 P.B. 1 28000 50000 18276 1989 Ford D F -800 Truck Crew Cab A. Dilbert M86670 Dec -01 1FDXK84P1KVA30009 F.L. 1 6775 34999 18415 1998 Che G 1500 Truck Pick-up Roger Foxx 11930Z Jun -02 1GCEC14W5WZ174930 P.B. 3932 N/A 18416 1998 Che G 1500 Truck Pick-up Bob Ellis 11929Z Jun -02 1GCEC14W2WZ145482 P.B. 3895 N/A 18627 1987 IGMC JLG Truck Crane NA FF146W Dec -01 1 GBL7D1 F1 HV1 14899 DADE 24140 24140 25000 1998 Ford Expedition Truck John Coyne FF077D Jun -02 1FMRU1768WLC29041 F.L. 4648 N/A 25001 1998 1 Ford Econoline Truck Van NA FF145W Jun -02 1FTRE1461WHC09335 F.L. 4528 N/A 250021 1998 Suspended Platform GONE N/A N/A F.L. 25003 1998 Tar et Pro 35 11 Saw Loo N/A N/A N/A 293130 P.B. N/A N/A 25004 1998]Tar et Saw. Loo N/A N/A N/A 227922 P.B. N/A N/A 25005 =9 !,Ford G F250 Truck Pick-up Rand Stotler FG605L Dec -01 1FTNF20F2XEB72564 F.P. 5330 10001 25006 1994 Ford JLG Truck Crane N/A GG294H Dec -01 1FDXFBOC2SVA48235 DADE 24700 24700 25007 1996 Cater iller N/A Forklift N/A N/A N/A ? P.B. N/A N/A 250091 1998 Target Pro 3511 Saw Loo N/A N/A N/A 292602 F.L. NIA N/A 25010 1999 Ford G Ranger Truck. Pick-up ennifer McJimse ID159J Jun -02 IFTYRIOC9XPA46775 F.L. 2903 9900 25011, 1999 Homemade N/A ITrailer N/A E43HLJ Jun -02 FLT1309MM F.L. 2780 N/A 250121 1999 :Ford D F -350 Truck, Pick-up P. Piwaronas 1D162J Dec -01 1FTSF30F4XEC99003 F.L. 5340 9900 25013 1999 Ford Custom Trailer Flatbed N/A E96NSI Jun -02 1 KX261863X1003629 DADE 1 5640 N/A 25014 1999 1 Ford Custom Trailer Flatbed NIA D84RQM Jun -02 1 KX26186OX1003643 5640 N/A 250161 1999 GRACO N/A Water Pump N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 25017 1999 IGRACO Water Pump N/A NIA 25018 1993 Ford LTA9000 Tractor N/A A92CLT Dec -01 1FDYY95R4PVA04097 F.L. 14325 61999 25019 1993 Ford F -700 Truck NIA M0822R Dec -01 1FDXK74C5PVA10540 F.L. N/A 28000 25020 1999 Bobcat X -320 Mini Excavator N/A N/A N/A 562316718 F.L. N/A N/A 25021 1999 Ford D F -350 Truck Pick-up Carlos Vera A17FXW Dec -01 IFTSF30FOXEE06497 F.L. 5340 9900 25022 1999 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up E- Armstrong A76SXC Jun -02 1FTNF20L6XEE64871 F.L. 4816 8800 25023 1994 Isuzu N -PR Truck Pie N/A A50JHY Dec -01 JALB4B1 K7R7001349 F.L. 4903 11050 25024 1999 lAirman N/A Air Compressor N/A A96GBP Jun -02 536020358 2244 N/A 25025 1999 !Airman N/A Air Compressor N A95GBP Jun -02 536020270 2244 N/A 25026 19991Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up Allan Dilbert A75SXC Dec -01 1FTNX20S3XED87655 F.L. 5205 8800 25027 19891Ford F -600 Truck Flatbed NA T89NE5 Dec -07 1FDNF60HXKVA06709 P.B. NA 25999 25028 1974 'Homemade 1 Trailer Trailer MIA T90NES I Jun -02 IBCC9285 DADE 5440 N/A www.ts�mr.stste.fl_us RFOSFn 9/1�1 DESIGNED TRAFFIC INSTALLATION COMPANY EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE LIST BY ASSET NUMBEA 1665 vnwi.hcm 0*. fl i. RFVLSFn .4MAIJ_' MAKE MODEL DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED TAG# EXPIRES VEHICLE SEil ID# YARD ACTUAL WE, G.V.W.R. 2 �FYE�M Vermeer D24X40A Navi ator David Johnson N A N/A 1VRS16025X7000829 N A N A Ford F -600 Truck Flatbed N/A D27GBU Dec -01 1 FDNF60H6KVA06710 DADE N/A 25999 25031 1968 Hyster Forklift from B &S N/A F.L. 25032 1996 International 4900 Truck N/A M2997X Dec -01 1 HTSHADR5TH385743 F.L. 15500 71999 25034 Trailer Cable from C- HOMEMADE F.L. 2420 25035 Trailer Cable from C- HOMEMADE F.L. 2780 250361 1979 Ged N/A Trailer N/A A73THB Jun -02 6D7970 F.L. 4200 N/A 25037' 1986 Ford /altec F- 800Derick Truck Crane NA N4714A Dec -01 IFDXK87UBGVA16391 DADE 23760 34000 25038 1995 Alle N/A Trailer Pole N/A A74THB Jun -02 IA913110XSS069189 F.L 4300 N/A 25039 Vermeer DT750 Mud Mixing Unit NIA N/A N/A 1vrtl60d2x1000666 F.L. N/A N/A 25040 1999 Custom 10T Trailer NIA E53FOG Jun -02 587261869X1004535 F.L. 5640 NIA 25041 2000 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up Ed Shea A37THC Dec-01 1FTNX20L6YEA14698 F.P. 5152 8800 25042 2000 Ford F -250 Truck Utility Willie Foster A38THC Jun -02 IFTNF20L5YEA03498 F.L. 4816 8800 25043 2000 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up Bobby Nelson A35THC Jun -02 1FTNF20L2YEA10165 F.L. 4816 8800 25044 1999''Takeuchi TB -015 Mini Excavator N/A N/A NIA 1156457 DADE N/A N/A 25045 1999lTakeuchi TB -025 Mini Excavator N/A NIA N/A 1257420 F.L. N/A N/A 25046 1998 1 Crosle N/A Trailer N/A T96MSI Jun -02 CTL612107WS009236 DADE 1850 N/A 25047 1998 Towmaster GT -2EP Trailer N/A B54CVM Jun -02 16JF01626W1031741 P.B. 2450 N/A 25048 1987 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up Floater D94RQJ Jun -02 1FTEF25NXHNA38967 F.L. 4320 N/A 25049 1968 Ford F -700 Truck Pounder N/A 13A 6532 -J Jul -01 IFDNK74P2JVA47644 F.L. 25000 25050 1997 Ford D F -250 Truck Utility Doug i3rzuziwsk 3A 251MP Jul -01 1FTHF25F4VEA38755 JAX N/A 8800 25051 1981 DITC BT75 Trailer - B &S TT- 498— N/A B85 CSL Jun -02 12632 F.L. 3520 N/A 25052 1977 Great Dane NIA Trailer Stora e N/A from TSC N/A 80151 8200 NIA 25053 1999 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up Rick Remington B10CSS Dec -01 1 FTNX20F5XEE87761 DADE 5666 8800 25054 2000 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up Frank McCoy B13CVS Dec -01 1 FTNX20L2YEA48315 DADE 5106 8600 25055 2000 National /Sterlin 990 Derick Truck Crane Jimmy Schmit M0403S Dec -01 2FZNAJC82YAG49049 F.L. 15882 58000 MT -431 1974 Ferre B &S Trailer F16DXQ Jun -02 745198 P.B. 3960 25057 1995 Ford CF -7000 Truck Pie Dustin M2994R Dec -01 1FDWH70C1SVA19664 26000 34999 25058 1995 Ford F -800 Truck. Pie N/A M2993R Dec -01 1FDWF80C1SVA32491 14000 34999 25059 2000 Ford G F -150 Truck Pick-up Jeff Kleiss A15RHD Jun -02 2FTRX17W9YCA07696 F.L. 4161 6050 25060 1994 Ford F -350 Truck Flatbed Michelle B39EVR Dec -01 1FTJW35M6REA35139 F.L. 5800 11000 25061 1995 Caterpillar 4168 Backhoe N/A N/A N/A O8SG02317 P.B. N/A N A 25062 1999 National 990 /Derick Crane on 25055 Serial #31726 250631 19991Ford F- 4501AT23 Truck Bucket Simroy Anderso D26GBU Dec -01 1FDXF46F2XEC29076 F.L. 6021 19999 50641 1999 Ford F -450 AT23 Truck, Bucket N/A D96RON Dec -01 1FDXF46FOXEA35095 DADE 6021 19999 25065 1989',Case 580 -K Backhoe N/A N/A N/A Sec #JJG0017521 N/A N/A 250661 19851Ford Fuel Truck Pi NA T42MRK Dec -01 1FDNF70H3FVA70599 F.L. 11460 25999 250671 Ford F -250 Truck Utility Kevin Sexton T95FEZ Jun -02 1FTNF20L3YEC68601 F.L. 8800 25068 2000 1 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up Carlos Perez T94FEZ Dec -01 1 FTNX20L6YEC69125 DADE 5152 8800 25069 2000 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up Tim McCoy T93FEZ Dec -01 1FTNX20F7YEC67037 F.L. 5668 8800 25070 2000 N/A N/A Saw Loo N/A N/A N/A N/A F.L. N/A N/A 25071 2000 N/A W41770 Saw Loo N/A N/A N/A Ser. #99060820 F. P. N/A N/A 25072 Rhino Post Driver w 1 "chucffiNIA N/A N/A Serial #119991 F.L. 25073 2000 Generac 4000XL Generator N/A N/A 7376408 F.L. 2507412000 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up D68NCA Dec -01 1FTNX20F9YEC84633 JAX 5668 8800 25075 1999 Sullair 185 Air Compressor U1073G Jun -02 Ser. # 004 - 129464 P.B. 2405 N/A 25076 1999 Sullair 185 Air Compressor NIA U1058G Jun -02 Ser# 004 - 129478 DADE 2405 N/A 25077 1999 !Sullair 185 Air Compressor U1059G Jun -02 Ser. # 004- 129472 F.L. 2405 N/A 25078 !John Deere 300D Backhoe NIA N/A T0300DA793699 DADE NIA N/A 25079 2000'Coffin LSB -6000A Hoist N/A N/A NIA F.L. N/A N/A 25080 1969 IF F -700 Truck. Dump NIA M1579S Dec -01 1FDNF70K8KVA53934 NAP 40000 25081 1986 Ford F -700 Truck, Dump NIA M1580S Dec -01 1 FDNK74N2GVA07233 DADE N/A 39999 25082 1995 Ford F -700 Truck, Dump N/A M1921S Dec -01 1FDPF8OC2SVA66007 DADE 12000 49999 25083 _25084i 1995 Ford F -800 Truck Dump N/A M1920S Dec -01 1FDPFBOC3SVA59129 DADE 6649 49999 1999 Belshe WB -1 Trailer N/A T70WGV Jun -02 16JFO1215XIO33334 F.P. 2250 N/A 25085 i 1999 lWhee 1 -60 Trailer Cable NIA D64TIB Jun -02 1 S9SK16N2Z1519297 NAP 1260 N/A 25086 1999 Belshe N/A Trailer N/A U80BND Jun -02 16JF0121XX1033328 DADE 2250 N/A 25087 1999 Belshe N/A Trailer N/A T68WGV Jun -02 16JFO121XX1033331 F.L. 2250 N/A 25088 1983 Sullivan 185 CFM Air Compressor N/A D91OXR Jun -02 NOVIN0200166662 F.L. 1950 N/A 25089 1983 ISullivan 210 CFM Air Compressor N/A D92QXR Jun -02 NOVIN0200166665 F.L. 1950 N/A 25090 1983 !Sullivan 185 CFM Air Compressor N/A U41DPN Jun -02 Serial #11666 / VIN 307 1950 N/A 25091 1983 Sullivan D210O Air Compressor N/A D90QXR Jun -02 NOVIN0200166655 F.L. 1950 NA 25092 1999 I.H.I. 18 -1 Mini Excavator N/A N/A N/A BC000001759 F.P. N/A N/A 250931 1999 I.H.I. N/A Mini Excavator N/A N/A N/A BC 001758 N/A N/A 25094 1999 I I.H.I. 18 -J Mini Excavator N/A N/A N/A BC 001716 DADE N/A N/A 25095 1999 U.H.I. 18 -J Mini Excavator N/A N/A N/A BC 001793 F.L. N/A N/A 25096 1998 IStihl TS- 760 -14" Saw Concrete N/A N/A N/A Serial # 38349804 IN IA N/A 25097 1977 !Great Dane N/A Trailer Storage N A N/A N/A 78461 N/A N/A 25098 1982 ASPT N/A Trailer Storage N/A N/A N/A FLT66420 N/A N/A 25099 1973 ASPT N/A Trailer Storage N/A N/A N/A FLT60150 N/A N/A 25100 Multi quip 3" Trash Pump N/A N/A 25101 Sullair MPB -60 Jack Hammer N/A N/A Serial #475032 F.P. 25102 1 Stihl TS- 400 -12" Saw Concrete N/A N/A Serial #45983363 P.B. 251031 1986 Mack Truck Dump M1947S Dec -01 VG6BAO4X8HB050864 DADE 15460 43999 25104 John Deere 310 D Backhoe N/A N/A 310DA814235 JAX 25105 Multi quip Tamper N/A N/A 251061 Multi gulp Tamper N/A N/A 25107 IStihl TS -4DO Saw Concrete N/A N/A Serial #138195087 25108 [Cushion Cut 3535WC Saw Loo N/A N/A 817 25109 IMulti ui Tamper N/A N/A 25110 =Multiquip Tamper N/A N/A 25111 19931Ford F -450 Truck Utility Janvier Aday T54MRD Dec -01 2FDLF47M1PCA34314 DADE 10500 14500 25112 1995 1 Ford F -800 Truck Dump M1922S Dec -01 1FONFBOC2SVA76432 JAX 43999 25113 1984 IFord D F -350 Truck Flatbed I T52MRD Dec -01 1FDKF3716EPB47070 F.L. 10000 11000 25114 1994 GMC Sierra Truck Pick-up Extra T53MRD Dec -01 1GTDC14Z8RZ533052 F.L. 6260 101DO 25115 1988 JGMC Sierra 3500 Truck— T51 MRD Dec -01 1 GDHR34K3JJ501557 DADE 10000 11000 25116 1986 1 Ford D F -150 Truck Flatbed Pull Box U32MIY Jun -02 1FTEF14Y9GNB44704 DADE 3686 25117 19871GMC Sierra 2500 Truck Pick-up Floater T50MRD Dec -01 1 GTFR24H6HF731326 P.B. 100001 11000 25118 3" Trash Pump N/A N/A 25119 3" Trash Pump N/A N/A vnwi.hcm 0*. fl i. RFVLSFn .4MAIJ_' DESIGNED TRAFFIC INSTALLATION COMPANY EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE LIST BYASSET NUMBER 1685 F YEAR I MAKE MODEL DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED TAGS EXPIRES VEHICLE SERIAU ID R YARD ACTUALWT. G.V.W.R. 25120 1999 Belshe Trailer T49MRD Jun -02 16JFO1213XIO33333 JAX 2250 25121 1989 Ford F -700 Truck M1578S Dec -01 1FDNK74P7KVA19162 F.L. 39999 25122 1987 1 Shel Trailer D19THZ Jun -02 PH9PH2249HA424520 6000 25123 1985 International Truck— D70XBB Dec -01 F61DVW22513 18200 25500 25124 1999 Vermeer V -8100 Trencher N/A N/A SIN 252 25125 1995 Ditch Witch DW 5110 Trencher N/A N/A 5L0B62 & 12074 25127111 1983 Sullair 185 Air Compressor D93OXR Jun -02 NOVIN0200166668 F.L. 1950 25128 1991 Ford F -350 Truck. Flatbed D71XBB Dec -01 1FDKF37H7MNA22960 F.L. 1 10000 11000 25129 2000 Ford G Su ercab Truck Pick-up Jody Phillips D80ROI Jun -02 1FTRX17L1YNB61299 JAX 4312 6300 25130 1970 Mack Truck. Pounder F98DXW Dec -01 R685T11267 F.L. 18000 34999 25131 1999 Vermeer V -5800 Trencher N A NIA 1VRM092W1T1000319 25132 2000 Ford G F -250 Truck. Utility Pedro Hernande T49LNX Dec -01 1 FTNX20FXYED41 115 DADE 5668 8800 25133 Skid Loader N/A N/A 515819215 DADE 25134 1999 Custom Trailer B53GHU Dec -01 587321337X1005194 DADE 25135 2000 Custom Trailer D69OXV Jun -02 NOVIN0200166653 DADE 25136 1997 Butler D7XI1 Trailer Mike Odom J0226J Dec -01 1BUD16207U2007114 F.L. 25137 Storage Container N/A N/A NAP 25138 Storage Container N/A N/A NAP 25139 Bobcat 753 Skid Loader Jim N/A N/A 515819912 DADE 251401 1999 1 Homemade Trailer DB8OXV Jun -02 9990601202991065 DADE 1900 25141 2000 Ford F -450 Truck Flatbed T son Rachel A36KSF Dec-01 1FDXF46F3YEA12699 F.L. 25142 2000 Custom Trailer T56OEK I Jun -02 587261860Y1000035 F.L. 5640 25143 1983 Homemade Trailer XQK22D Jun -02 NOVIN000081613796 F.L. 1800 25144 1978 Ford F250 Truck Utility Vinnie Sanchez T69WGV Dec -01 TCL33BV600441 F.L. 5860 10001 25145 1993 'Chevy 1500 Truck Pick-up Sunny B3766M Dec -00 1GCDC14ZOPE237186 F.L. 25146 2000 i Custom Trailer T71WGV Jun -02 5B7321335Y1000190 2200 25147 2000 !Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up Jim Coleman D27XAX Dec -01 1FTNX20F8YEE10884 NAP 5706 8800 25148 2000!Custom 1OT242EDLP Trailer D83XAU Jun -02 5137261864X1000748 F.L. 5640 25640 25149 2000!Custom 1OT242EDLF Trailer D84XAU Jun -02 587261869Y1000258 F.L. 5640 25640 25152 2001 Ford Explorer Truck John Mader T93MRH Sep-01 1FMZU67EXlUB38800 F.L. 4090 5400 25153 I Concrete Mixer N/A N/A 25154 19971Ford D F -350 Truck Crew Cab Jean Moise B27GFY Dec -01 1FTJW35H6VMA10710 F.L. 10500 25155 1995 Ford F -800 Truck Dump M4467R Dec -01 1FDPF8OC6SVA77009 DADE 39999 25156 John Deere 300 D Backhoe N/A N/A TO300DA789404 DADE 25157 2000 National /Sterlin 990 Derick Truck Crane Angel Deslis M3159S Dec -01 2FZXBJCB4YAH01724 F.L. 2000 58000 25158 2001 Ford G F -250 Truck Pick-up David Wright D40XBL Dec-01 1 FTNX20LX1 EA35771 JAX 5269 8800 25159 2000 Ford F -450 AT23 Truck Bucket Carl Smith E52FOG Dec -01 1 FDXF46FBYEC71219 DADE 6223 15000 25160 2001 International 4700 LRI1155 Truck Bucket I M1944S Dec-01 1 HTSCAAP21 H336305 P. B. 33000 25161 1999 International 1700JBT Truck Crane A. Dilbert M3002B Dec -01 1HTSCABN3XH643018 F.L. 25162 1996 Bobcat 753 Skid Loader N/A N/A 725772 251631 1999 1 Bobcat 763 Skid Loader N/A N/A 512238110 25164 1999 Boma BT -60 Rammer Com actor N/A N/A 10540401712 25165 1999 Bobcat 320 Mini Excavator N/A N/A 562231340 25166 2000 !International 4700/LR[1155ITruck, Bucket M30056 Dec -01 1 HTSCAAP41 H336306 JAX 4700 33000 25167 2001 International 4700/LRI 11551 Truck Boom M1942S Dec -01 1 HTSCAAP91 H336303 NAP 33000 25168 2001 International 47001LRI 11551 Truck Bucket M1943S Dec -01 1 HTSCAAP01 H3363D4 DADE 18275 33000 25169 1998 jIntem ational 4700 ITruck, Crane M1962S Dec -01 1HTSCABN8XH593622 4700 33000 25170 2000 1 Solar Technolo ST -4815 lArrow Board T82MSG Jun -02 00- 094880 P. B.. 25171 2000 Vermeer 750 S Trailer Vacuum D61LFE Jun -02 I1R9BB1428YP30316O F.L. 25172 2000 John Deere LT155 Riding Mower N/A N/A IMOL155HI25043 F.L. 251731 1997 Ford LT8513 Truck Water M1967S Dec -01 1FDYS86E6WVA06245 F.L. 2517412000 International 4700 Truck Crane M3824R Dec -01 1HTSCABN4YH201902 DADE 25175 1 Case 1845C Skid Loader N/A N/A JAF0314330 P. B. 25176 John Deere 310D Backhoe Coleman N/A N/A T0310DA808929 25177 1999 Custom Trailer 5B736153BX1005089 25178 ICase 580L Backhoe -2WD N/A N/A JJG0305805 25179 ICase 580L Backhoe -4WD N/A N/A JJG0306646 P. B. ?00 F-350 F -350 Truck Pick-up David Caulkett T48VLP Jan -02 1FDSX34F51EB28786 5526 9900 25181 1 2001 (Ford_ F -350 Truck Pick-up T47VLP Dec -01 1FTWW32FXlEA66930 P. B. 6439 11200 25182.20011For" Explorer Truck David Davin T49VLP Jan -02 1FMYU60E0lUA60310 3722 4760 25183 2001 Ford F -250 Truck Pick-up Vinnie Sanchez T46VLP Dec -01 1FTNX20FBlEA46276 5832 8800 25184. 19981Bobcat 320 Backhoe N/A N/A 562316640 25185I2001'Ford F -150 Truck Pick-up John Collins E37UGI Dec -01 1FTRX17L41NA20152 F.L. 4259 6300 25186' 19981 Ford F -800 Truck Pounder U47DPJ Dec -01 1FDNFBOCBWVA37561 JAX 6775 18001 251871 19971Butler Trailer 25136 J0226J Dec -01 1BUD162071-12007114 F.L 25188 2001IFord F -150 Truck Pick-up Mike Carver T89VLR Jun -02 1FTRX17W0lNBOB920 F.L. 4178 6050 25189 2001 1 Ford F -150 Truck Pick-up Ernie Medina T91VLR Jun -02 1FTRX17W51NA11065 F.L. 4178 6050 25190 12' MC Truck Flatbed N4729A Dec -01 1 GDJ7H1 P91_608149 F.L. 7270 34999 25191 1980 Ford F -700 Truck N4728A Dec -01 F70HBHB1311 F.L. 11640 34999 25192 1989iFord Truck N4733A Dec -01 1FDNF60HlKVA34088 F.L. 1 20200 29999 25193 19901Ford F -700 Truck N4734A Dec -01 1FDNF70KXLVA09189 F.L. 6649 39999 25194 1987! MC Truck Pick p N4747A Dec -01 1GDJ7DlBlHV516689 F.L. 11600 34999 25195 2001 Ford F -250 D I Truck Pick-up John Cryer U97DP0 Dec -01 1 FTNX20F91 EA29969 P.B. 5646 8800 25196 Homemade Trailer Cable B31GGB Dec -01 DADE 251971 'John Deere 300 Backhoe N/A N/A TO300DA79336 DADE 2519811992 Butler Trailer D980XR Jun -02 NOVIN0200167089 F.L. 1600 25199 2001 Ford F -150 Truck Pick-up Jerry Grier U95DPQ Jun -02 1 FTRW07W91 KA87516 JAX 4490 6350 25200 2001 Ford F -150 Truck Pick-up A. Clarke U96DPO Jun -02 2FTRX17W51CA44170 F.L. 4178 6050 25201 1 Arnica Arrow Board 21316152 engine N 25202 2001 Case 860 Trencher N/A N/A JAF0331419 F.L. 25203T Bame Trailer 1B950093CS -026 F.L. 25204'.2001 Homemade Trailer Pole F.L 25205'2001'Homemade ITrailer FLT- 1025 -NN F.L. 25206 '.John Deere 3100 Backhoe N/A N A T0310DA823397 F.L. 25207 19871GMC Sterling B -7 Truck Auger U1072G Jun -02 1GDL7DIBOHV518717 F.L. 7000 43999 25208 1997 ford F -800 Truck Dump U80DPX Dec -01 1FOPF80C2YUA40592 JAX 6649 31000 25209: 1997 Ford F -800 Truck Dump N4749A Dec -01 1FDPF80C4VVA40433 6649 31000 25210'1997 Ford F -800 Truck Dump N4748A Dec -01 1 FDPFBOCOVVA40431 6649 31000 2,211 ' 1999 I.H.I. Mini Excavator BC001853 JAX 25212 Belshe Trailer for 25211 WMMI.Iv s;ts .11 — RFVLSFn AM 3,V 01 DESIGNED TRAFFIC INSTALLATION COMPANY EQUIPMENT AND VEHICLE LIST BYASSET NUMBER 1685 ' F YEAR MAKE MODEL DESCRIPTION ASSIGNED I TAG# EXPIRES VEHICLE SERIA J ID # YARD IACTUAL WT. G.V.W.R. 25213 1999 I.H.I. Mini Excavator BC001663 NAP 25214 Belshe Trailer for 25213 T62CIY Jun -02 16JFO1214X1D33454 NAP 25215 1999 I.H.I. Mini Excavator 25216 Belshe Trailer for 25215 25217 1999 Bobcat 763 Skid Loader 512237839 25218 Belshe Trailer for 25217 25219 1999.Bobcat 763 Skid Loader 512231129 252201 20001Belshe Trailer for 25219 U73MZK Jun -02 16JF0162X11035820 F.L. 3000 N/A 25221 1 19991Bobcat 763 Skid Loader 5122237840 F.L. 25222 1 2000 Belshe Trailer U74MZK Jun -02 16JF0162411035B62 F.L. 3000 N/A 25223 1999'Bobcat 763 Skid Loader 512233814 F.L. 25224 1998'To ota 20JX Mini Excavator 64000887 F.L. 25225 1997 II. H. 1. 76X Mini Excavator 1319417 25226 20001Hoo er Trailer UBBMIT Jun -02 4TOFB2527Y1000058 NAP 5000 24950 25227 1986 Mack Texoma 700 Truck Auger U1074G Jun -02 2M2B126CXGC012805 29140 25228 Homemade Trailer, 3 -axle 25229 2001 Homemade Trailer, 1 -axle 25230 Sullair 185 Air Compressor 004- 004 - 130120 25231 2000 National /Sterlin 681c /Derick Truck Crane iami Remin to A- 450275 Jul -01 2FZXBJBB9YAF48517 DADE 25232 1995 Sullar 185 Air Compressor 116301 25233 1996 Sullivan 185 Air Compressor 15042 A 25234 1995 Sullair 185 Air Compressor 117063 25235 1996 Sullivan 185 Air Compressor 15532 A 25236 1995 Sullivan 185 Air Compressor 116291 JAX 25237 2001 Ford F -150 Truck Pick-up 1FTRX17W31NB41913 ORL 1 4178 6050 252381 1996 1 Protect -O -Flash Arrow Board F01DXY Jun -02 0696B76 DADE 25239 1996 Protect -O -Flash Arrow Board FOODXY Jun -02 0696885 25240 1995 Vermeer 4150 Trencher 1VRF0820851000749 JAX 25241 2001 Mirk 60" Prod. Sit Auger N/A I N/A 25242 2001 Mirk 48" Press. Bit Auger N/A N/A 25243 2001 Mirk 54" Press. Bit Auger N/A N/A 25244 2001 Mirk 60" Press, Bit Auger N/A N/A — I— c.. fl — RFVISFn O1.9lJl1l11 .:.MasTec September 13, 2001 Collier County Government 3301 East Tamiami Trial General Services Building Naples, FL 34112 Re: RFP # 01 -3280 Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights Memberships and Affiliations Dear Gentlemen & Ladies, 1685 Designed Traffic Installation Co., an ITS division of MasTec (MasTec ITS team) is fully committed to our industry in signalization, lighting, signing, guardrail, electrical and Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Designed Traffic Installation Co. belongs to the following organizations: ➢ ITS America ➢ ITS Florida ➢ American Traffic Safety Services Association (ATSSA) ➢ International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA) ➢ Institute of Traffic Engineering (ITE) ➢ National Transportation Communications Interface Protocol (NTCIP) Committee ➢ Institute of Electric and Electronic Engineering ➢ Associations of Builders and Contractors Institute (ABCI) ➢ Florida Transportation Builders Association (FTBA) ➢ Team Florida ➢ Engineering Contractors Association (ECA) Designed Traffic feels that the best way to stay ahead in business is to stay ahead with new ideas and technology in the field of work. Sincerely, Designed Traffic Installation Co. An ITS Division of MasTec Jeffrey M. Kleiss Senior Estimator / Project Manager MasTec Intelligent Traffic Services 2801 SW 46 Avenue Ft. Lauderdale Florida 33314 954.587.1700 fax 954.587.4070 www.mastec.com 1685 •:- MasTec September 14, 2001 Collier County Government 3301 E. Tamiami Trail General Services Building Naples, FL 34112 RE: RFP #01 -3280 Installation of Maintenance of Street Lights Response Time Dear Gentlemen & Ladies: Under normal emergencies Designed Traffic shall respond within two (2) hours from the notification. Under normal work orders Designed Traffic will perform the work within 14 calendar days after the receipt of all materials. Under normal operation Designed Traffic employs ten (10) employees in Collier County as full time staff. Designed Traffic has access to an additional twenty (20) employees from our Telecom Division located within blocks of our local office. Designed Traffic can provide hurricane disaster emergency relief for the entire county. Designed Traffic has over two hundred (200) employees in the State of Florida and another three hundred (300) employees in the Southeast United States. Once notified of a hurricane disaster Designed Traffic can mobilize field crew within hours of a direct hit of a hurricane. Designed Traffic working in South Florida for 35 years knows how important it is to stockpile basic lighting components for hurricane repair. Designed Traffic is fully committed to a timely response time for the Collier County and Partners under this contract. Sincerely, Designed Traffic Installation Co. An ITS Division of MasTec ITS Jeffrey M. Kleiss Senior Estimator/Project Manager MasTec Intelligent Traffic Services 2801 SW 46 Avenue Ft. Lauderdale Florida 33314 954.587.1700 fax 954.587.4070 www,mastec.com RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 18 PRICE PROPOSAL 16B5 Emergency or routine street light repairs, new wiring, and street light pole installations. The County is to reimburse the Contractor for labor and materials used to complete the job per the FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual. All materials will be paid per the Basis of Estimates Manual as "Furnish" except where noted as "Furnish and Install (F & 1)" bid submitted by the Contractor. Contractor will furnish material items and installation will be priced per hour except where indicated as "F &I ". The Contractor is to be available twenty -four (24) hours per day, three hundred sixty -five (365) days per year. Travel time to and from the job site shall not exceed a total of three (3) hours in addition to time spent on job site. I. HOURLY RATES A. Labor (Normal working hours 8:00 a.m. 4� to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.) $ per man hour B. Overtime Labor (Emergency overtime rate for hours other than normal "Working Day ". Work must be pre- approved by the Traffic Operations Manager or his designee) $.' per man hour C. Heavy Equipment Bucket Truck, Line Truck, Auger, Back Hoe, Etc. Cranes: 35 Ton 12-1/2 Ton Rock Auger (Pressure Digger) D. Minor Equipment Cement Saw, Arrow Board, Air Compressor, Jack Hammer, etc E. Vehicles Passenger Vehicle or pickup truck. 11. MATERIALS 13 $ (Ot . 00 per unit hour $ 1, per unit hour $ �o ®6' per unit hour per unit hour 00 per unit hour Material Markup (Cost plus % - - Any material item that is not covered as a pay item will fall under Material Markup) 12. 6 % per unit hour B. Materials are to be bid by the Contractor as "Furnish Only" except where noted as "Furnish and Install (F & I)" per Florida Department of Transportation "Basis of Estimates Manual" and shall include, but not be limited to: RFP No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights PaLye 19 PAY ITEM DESCRIPTION AMOUNT qww 339 -1 Misc. Asphalt As required by ob $ :J O 60 TN 400 -1 -15 Misc. Class 1 Concrete As required by ob $ F3ra.0to CY 575 -1 -1 (F & I) Sod, Bahia As required by ob $ , , -7 SY 575 -1 -4 (F & I) Sod, St. Augustine As required by ob $ 71-- SY 620 -1 -1 (F & I) Grounding Electrode $ LF 630 -1 -11 (F & I) Conduit - Aboveground S ` (-4 LF 635 -1 -11 (F & I) Pull Box $ (o3,00 EA 639 -1 -12 Overhead Electrical Service Assembly $ 1.00 Assembly 639 -1 -22 Underground Electrical Service Assembly $ v 0 Assembl 639 -2 -2 Electrical Service Wire $ S LF 715 -11 -111 Luminaire (Roadway, Cobrahead $ 9.'® EA 715 -11 -113 Luminaire Pole -To $ e181k. EA 715 -1 -211 Conductors #10 $ 6 . (, LF 715 -1 -212 Conductors #8 $ 0.-70 LF 715 -1 -213 Conductors #6 $ O. " z,) 0 LF 715 -1 -214 Conductors #4 $ 0. 9j-` LF 715 -1 -215 Conductors #2 $ . 0 � LF 715 -14 -21 Pull Box Moulded, Highway Lighting) $ C, .06 EA 715 -19 -1 Surge Protector Pole Base 480V $ ?7. 6 EA 715 -21 -1 Luminaire Starter Board (Igniter) $ (o G. 0 EA 715 -2 -115 (F & I) PVC Conduit Underground* $ 1. �� LF 715 -2 -215 (F & I) PVC Conduit Under Pavement* $ 1 °7.00 LF 715 -2 -415 (F & I) PVC Conduit Jack & Bore* $ 11. W LF 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Lighting Pole 45' $ . 60 EA 715 -34 -1 Aluminum Lighting Pole 50' $ -2-:511. 0 r3 EA 715 -35 -2 Mast Arm Only (Roadway Lighting—to 15' $ $40 5. Co EA 715 -36 -22 Frangible Transformer Base $ ?:S Z. 0,5 EA 715 -36 -24 Frangible Door Assembly $ 1 C � 'Ta Oa EA 715 -500 -1 Pole Cable Distribution System $ 1 ''A.100 EA No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly ONLY (Cobrahead representative of General Electric, Hubble, or Cooper) $ 1 �5 EA No FDOT -BEM # Ballast Assembly ONLY (Pole -top representative of General Electric, Hubble, or Cooper) $ ^ c4.60 EA No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect 30 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R $ 3 4 t . o o EA No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect 60 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R $ 5 3�+. 06 EA No FDOT -BEM # Disconnect 100 Amp, 600 V, 3 pole, NEMA 3R $ 1 54.00 EA No FDOT -BEM # Single Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE ) $ 1 0e-) EA No FDOT -BEM # Double Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE ) $ to '4.4 r, EA No FDOT -BEM # Triple Pole Breaker (480V representative of Square D, General Electric, or ITE ) $ EA No FDOT -BEM # Dummy Fuse $ 14.00 EA No FDOT -BEM # Fuse for pole base 10 Amp, 600 $ t q . oc, EA No FDOT -BEM # Fuse Holder in -line, weatherproof, 600V 33,00 8 A No FDOT -BEM # Lam HPS, 250 $ ! �5q . 6C EA No FDOT -BEM # Lam HPS, 400 W $ 1 Vi. 00 EA No FDOT -BEM # Lighting Contactor (3 -pole, 30 Amp, 600V, varying coil voltage) $ do EA No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse 30 Am $ =UqO. CC EA No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse 60 Am $ LAao.,�o EA No FDOT -BEM # Load Center Breaker, Main Fuse 100 Am $ .ors EA RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 20 No FDOT -BEM # Main Breaker Panel Board (100 Amp, 480V, 3- phase, 30 Circuit, NEMA 3R ) $ 546EA No FDOT -BEM # Photocell Twist Lock or Hub Style) $ 13 44.,00 EA No FDOT -BEM # Photocell Control Transformer 500VA 480/240 -120V $ EA � 1 *Underground, Under Pavement, and Jack & Bore Conduit may be installed by the use of directional bore equip at the contractor's discretion at the same rate as bid. 1685 •:?I a sTe c September 13, 2001 Collier County Government 3301 East Tamiami Trial General Services Building Naples, FL 34112 Re: RFP # 01 -3280 Installation and Maintenance of Street Lights Litigation Dear Gentlemen & Ladies, Designed Traffic Installation Co. is not currently or in the past five years has been in contractual litigation. Sincerely, Designed Traffic Installation Co. An ITS Division of MasTec Jeffrey M. Kleiss Senior Estimator / Project Manager MasTec Intelligent Traffic Services 2801 SW 46 Avenue Ft. Lauderdale Florida 33314 954.587.1700 fax 954.587.4070 www.mastec.com 1685 PROPOSERS QUALIFICATION FORM IST MAJOR WORK PRESENTLY UNDER CONTRACT: % Completed Project Contract Amount 'SEC A 4 eu $ LIST CURRENT PROJECTS ON WHICH YOUR FIRM IS THE CANDIDATE FOR AWARD: Have you, at any time, failed to complete a project? ❑ Yes [ "No (If the answer is yes, submit details on separate sheet. REFERENCES: 'lank(s) Maintaining Account(s): Pursuant to information for prospective bidders /proposers for the above - mentioned proposed project, the undersigned is submitting the information as required with the understanding that it is only to assist in determining the qualifications of the organization to perform the type and magnitude of work intended, and further, guarantee the truth and accuracy of all statements herein made. We will accept your determination of qualifications without prejudice. Name of "Vanization: �- Signea —T Aa c _ s4 fl ton Cz, Title: Attested Title: C& 4raoS Ad tnini64m4 J r Date: q 1 aG a 12 Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH GOVERNOR July 11, 2001 Designed Traffic Installation Co. 2801 SW 46th Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314 "REVISED" RE: CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATION Gentlemen: 1685 THOMAS F. BARRY, JR. SECRETARY The Department of Transportation has qualified your company for the amount and the type of work indicated below. Unless your company is notified otherwise, this rating will expire April 30, 2002. Please take notice that to ensure continuity in your certification at least thirty (30) days must be allowed for the processing of your next application for qualification. To remain qualified with the Department, a new application must be submitted subsequent to any significant change in the financial position or the structure of your firm as described in Section 14- 22.005(3), Florida Administrative Code. MAXIMUM CAPACITY RATING: $100,000,000.00, single Contract and $324,570,000.00, in the aggregate Surety Commitment. WORK CLASS RATINGS: 1. Major Bridges: a. Bridges which include Bascule Spans ............................. b. Bridges which include Curved Steel Girders ....................... c. Bridges with Multi -Level Roadways ............................... d. Bridges of Concrete Segmental Construction ........................ e. Bridges which include Steel Truss Construction .................... f. Bridges which include Cable Stayed Construction .................. 'y. Bridq,_:3 of ::onv(- _ntionai construction 'which are over a water opening of 1000 feet or more ...... ............................... _ 2. Intermediate Bridges (Bridges that contain none of the type of construction listed under Major Bridges and span lengths exceeding 50 feet (center to center of cap) ...... ............................... 3. Minor Bridges (Bridges with span lengths not exceeding 50 feet (center to center or cap) and total length not exceeding 300 feet. A Minor Bridge shall not contain any types of construction listed under Major Bridges or Intermediate Bridges ) ........................... 4. Bascule Bridge Rehabilitation .......... ............................... _ 5. Grading (Includes clearing and grubbing, excavation, and embankment)... _ 6. Drainage (Includes all storm drains, pipe culverts, culverts, etc.) .... _ 7. Flexible Paving (Includes limerock and shell base and other optional base courses, soil- cemented based, mixed -in -place bituminous paving, bituminous surface treatments, and stabilizing ) ........................ _ 8. Portland Cement Concrete Paving ....... ............................... 9. Hot Plant -Mixed Bituminous Structural and Surface ©urses y' www.dot.state.fl.us RECYCLED PAPER Designed Traffic Installation Co. 1605 July 11, 2001 Page Two SPECIALTY CLASSES OR WORK: Electrical Work, Guardrail, Traffic Signals, Computerized Traffic Control Systems, Roadway Signing and Impact Atten uatcrs .......................... X Please be advised the Department of Transportation has considered your company's qualification in all work classes requested. We have evaluated your company's organization, management, work experience, work performance and adequacy of equipment as directed by section 14- 22.003, Florida Administrative Code. Based on this evaluation, the Department is not able, at this time, to prequalify your company for the work classes: Intent Traffic Systems, CCTV, Video Detection and Fiber Optic Cables. Y712 may apply, jr, i n : ^:' itin�, fOr a n.�'Ti wed Certificate L i ate O Qualification at any time prior to the expiration date of this certificate according to Section 14- 22.0041(3), Florida Administrative Code. Please be advised if certification in additional classes of work is desired, documentation is needed to show that your company has done such work with your own forces and equipment or that experience was gained with another contractor and that you have the necessary equipment for each additional class of work requested. Also, refer to the note at the bottom of Page 16 of the Application for Qualification when supplying additional information. Sincere yours, - i? Juanita Moore, Manager Contracts Administration Office JM:vas 12/89 (SEE NOTES ON REVERSE SIDE) ow', NOTES APPLICABLE TO RATINGS ASSIGNED ON FRONT OF THIS FORM THE MAXIMUM CAPACITY RATING ASSIGNED HEREON SHALL BE REDUCED BY THE VALUE OF ALL UNCOMPLETED WORK YOU HAVE UNDER CONTRACT (OR SUBCONTRACT) , REGARDLESS OF WHERE OR WITH WHOM IT MAY BE CONTRACTED, TO DETERMINE YOUR BIDDING CAPACITY AT THE PARTICULAR TIME (CURRENT CAPACITY). THIS DETERMINATION SHALL BE MADE AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 14- 22.006, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. THIS SECTION ALSO REQUIRES THAT YOU CERTIFY UNDER OATH AS TO YOUR CURRENT CAPACITY FOR EACH LETTING AT iWHICH YOU SUBMIT A BID. APPROVAL OF WORK CLASSIFICATIONS FOR YOUR ORGP.NIZATION IS INDICATED WITH AN "x" IN THE SPACE I_MMEDIATELY TO THE RIGHT OF "WORK CLASS RATINGS" AND "INCIDENTALT CLASSES" AS APPLICABLE. - r�t��'- hr ^'Iz r 2 fi p 1 I i €Ilbstir i JpF a .a." tyr v. LU Y;�f' +� L✓lN r ll''9 ���r1yUllyS I�� >� ,>� hll .I litl , /�I�� __ Yr Ws fl -� h 't11I�F� F1,� „�u 4v i 11 r 4. I t f +'y l�^�I°1 I I SO_ y �ilpl �kp'il I III Is' - ZX kTn In r S e `W� pp,��1�Irriy rt is Ilil'h I, i., ai / d II rlyl NM '`” I I Ili r�lli�p1 r' ` 1� tai llr4k� Illifllll7�! FII10 ,; t r € > Ifir it I� i�5'I ��5 � IIX I iI III li '� Xi 7 Illll -,aa„ ,51, ,i I rNrl , IIh11 Ir i rr4a'�^t -•" 47�W�'lu I I %/ ti,l,��h = W iI ,Y..=.`. OWLi � < ♦ ppJII�fIrIIrO �.c � 'C. � a r uHlrlhif Ilhlr} ' Q t: °j hugIhl II I " k f .+``v.:- I'r 6ulplllfa � t #�� ^lll "�N'1�t9All��ry l�Ih� Yr. 4 NWw� r a l4 it 14 rc r If �' N l , Q �„':4 Ir 11 rh�liC lr III F I fI 'F 1� r �i�h � ���� Gri:Gwiyl ,p yll Ija II „Irll I,, { Y "y111w' t J�iwll= i,rt 1�iw.1" IIF I oua L may" may► �/ I � � o 4�+�'i�'f> +luny ��,�L``��€ I �. �i• ����:�.�`�"".�r'l�ibl lipl I � �_ II .I 1685 Gr u .Q wi FIII F� . qll r ; IIT �III11 M-4 Jdtlr r ��t I, �rlw rrw II� - IIII Ill��IIh� Illlo:.r _ LU Ca � I NQ` Cpl o�a N C0 OG0 C O U z Z oQ a Z in O o0 z s � 7 O QU O W C p O O UJ F=- fQfn 0 0 N m ¢ N to n M C+"1 M a PLO ai '-I N TJ N CU b O ro a O fs+ H H a a � m rHn > H ..0 :J V110 H w w ccn tr z�cc � C7I cV � H UJ W O z Q o L) C) C) ° 0 o `- "t I 0 0 C) cn H d cn z 0) 00 O OD 00 O O N 7 r Vt LO =) � m r r c 0 m Q �- c7 ❑ m W W J ° CL uj C) m m O o 0 0 0 0 LO O N N Y 64 a Lo Lr� O 000 N < z <0 �t O -. r ion L) >- W ¢ fA � J Z Cn L, c O z v o f LL. °vim a 1;; OLU � z0 C) a= O 0 0 0 ti 0 0 0 0 z 0_! cn 0�z N v o v co LO r coo U) ¢ ¢o L / gz� 0¢ Lc C7 O Lo V � CD — O r rn r c z 3 Q m V N N r (rj r N O _ E ° 'C cn C1. U) m ma m` CD zU,_ °o 0 0 m ° m i- 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci0 C Qom° N cli O o 7 0 F- n N r ° N L cu aC 0 O T T �O O m C1 0 m°c) CC E= 00 c-0 E °' Ez, m a H Z Q °m OO 00 00 00 00 00 00 o D O N ca -a N U z❑ v_ - r co �n r o CD cv U E x 0 O` 0° Cl) U (T N O m v O CA 't co r CV M m r M O U .m`. O O O Q O O V: CO O r co C E O C 3 m N r cli N O lV U co E o rr `n cc ca O M O r co N Mood .0 O N 2 co CJ1 O O Co O O r O N M .0 LL m m o 0 O c t o U m y o a cc 3 m` 3 m E m m co m co c ° U o o E m m oo`��°� om m a a ❑ o ❑ a E U w Q7 O f�- Z H- O O M p C N W z O 0 U W O I ° o m ¢ t4 ,: °Cp c=E y N O m m a s coo E o m o LL>' o 2 c E M U o O ¢ L ° r CV E N ._° _°c' c E p m co i c M J > = (U6 T CN N I Lo r Lo N � D O N p¢ N T LLI p N m y r .d. U p O r r � y0 m U p m cm Z co- O N an U O M LO cc )j � U co 'II CD CIJ y aCi ° N r U C O U O O W M a' ¢ N 00 06 3 m �n ¢ M p o U cs a� r. N N w *k »9 O ca cV r *t o N It o c p o c O 00 N O ._ U co O CO E C C � M pUj Q) C 7 L W co J c0 LL N d' 4t (q (C a. O L) O U O a. U Q�j a. _ U CD W D a_ J O cu a a p O rT - c n (D O _ E E O z E5 cc U m N � o�c cc cc U 9 z 0 U Z Z O Q o Z �0 co oU z�z s � Z LL O O 00 LL cn o = uj F U3 O O N C77 Q 4 M Cl) M a W CU (b -o aJ b � O 0 a H F 1-7 r=4 F N H C U Q,' H F Wi z (n U � O A o ID r- U CO LU LJ U z a° m U m N C � U C E O 0 U 0 Cn t E 0 0 '= to CL N � O m N p) L � 3 � c U � C C CT U � C O N � T O (0 _ C O � .a m C �O ` f0 � _ O Qi .0 3 M Z w w _ --j = g� 0 Q (n 0 H O O O O 0 O O O O O N O = O O O _ O U < O O op o_ O C) C) o O 0 O (D Q Z o Cn O N Cl) E'a t7i M O M On �? Nr LO N 0 O O a O 00 �� O O O O O O =- O O d V U N Z =O to C0D r �I 00 m U (C) Cn Cl) 04 r r- O CD CD r(n to OD O T O r Ln CY) ❑ m C C O= `- I W W U CA .0 4) = W 0 J Q mSf- 1 O m g O p p 0 ^ to m m U O = p 0 N U Z U m U") O ai M o o C to 6) rfl Y a Q ZO CND CCDD O CD r N r r �- r r U C iA w U •C Z O z y f0 U o N C O v H L1) 30 '0 C .0 cu (-D = U Qa m CO o m` o in m` D C1. r-) zZ o o f o U) U cn LL H WU O O O O O O O O O W J Z m 0 r Z CD M CD V O V M L N J O J N <Q 0 ¢ L 3 c en aw o ° m c- E (O c a) a) T a Q 4 Q F- t- Z r m r pin 0 0 =0 a(DO m CO n N E (C° '� m J 04 0 L9 U) O> aa) p Ln (n LN h M Z w w _ --j = g� 0 Q (n 0 H O O O O 0 O O O O O N O = O O _ o O Cl) E'a V Z On O M O O a O 00 O O O O O O O O =- O O d V U N Z =O to C0D U (C) Cn Cl) 04 r r- O CD CD 'r to OD O T O r Ln CY) C C C O= `- o y U 0 U CA .0 4) = mSf- 1 ^ to m m U O = p N N Cl) U") M o o C to 6) CND CCDD (OD r r �-- r r �- r r U C iA w •C Z y f0 U o N C O v 30 '0 C .0 cu (-D = U Qa m CO o m` o in m` D o o f o U) U cn ... H Z Z7 r r 0 O CO UUW, z m m O N LO r N a� 3 c en aw o ° m c- E O O c a) T _ po pin ° a(DO m CO n N E (C° '� m J 04 0 L9 U) O> aa) p Ln (n LN h co p ' () r c� C O Q y cm r Q M ^ C O� L i r0 r �' Cn d' > Lo N M z m U (p N C O N> O U fD ..O O co CD .0 I- > CD ti m M O O m CV iv CO y a0i C- N 0 CA Q N to O) tp O Q. i Clj Q O Cn p m coo > W CD CD 00 0 M C N sk W rt (n [Q N D W W 0' .CO. - O o 0 U d y N O O N m N N o N CD U -� U O ti ? z C U CUi O� O 'y o S O 0 O(n o 2 .0 u 6i to aU a� a2 (L U) a(n o-w as a`� (L5 o 0 t2 Z 15 (o U m I N Q T QS C � 00 z 0 U 0 o Z � Q oZ CL O ZZy oU za z LU Z ❑ O n V. cr pp LL p w � U 0 0 N Lo m Q M M M :Z4 a) •v Q) .b z ro Oa H cE-4 � H I a) U I<C H L H A 3 W z cn uj U H .-1 UI F-1 LU UI z nQ a� is a) U m vi C O U o C E U -0 3 N E O 'O w O- y r.-. N W -0 m m .0 cu 3 �' lA c U m c O U N 0 O N T T N O _ C O ..O m Zj .2 ,20 fB m ` m O 0 � O y m y O O 3 0 O O CO D 0 0 c7 O � co � O 0O O o F o LU U Z Cl O O O O O O c..) § O Z F- O O¢ O O N N r - N o st O v F- I� c0 U U o O O O m (D Io co co ¢ `_ N SOU J J J N Z O r — O 0 O0 z O m O N Q Z O < >- O r Q >• En E m x O L) O m W W O O N C Z ¢ N F- Z O LU O O O to IL O O N r r C) En z Ln �.0L-0 CL Q O m U O c p U 0) O 0 O O CO D 0 0 c7 O � co � O 0O O (e) o F o LU U Z Cl O O O O O o r c..) § O Z F- O O¢ O O N N r - N o st O v O c0 to I� c0 U N r (e) L7 Z j w O m 2 0 ¢ O F- o ` O N o 0 bs � o r 0 0 0 �Cm Q } Q O m CL Z Z W J m0 Oo C) L Cy °o C' SOU J J J N rn F- F- Z " CD cp — O 0 O0 z (e) L7 Z j w O m 2 0 ¢ O F- o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 O m C M.0 0 0 et a �, a _ Q V 2 m O O O O N O "T O O O O N Q Z N O 0 Ul N m E m x O L) W c O O N C Z ¢ N O O O to O O N r r O O U p En �.0L-0 m U O c p 0) O Or N M o o a r N r N T <r- C14 N T N N N N N N C E9 O N r r r r a) -= p V1 CD U o O v U v �" L) C L N a m '2 '2 at )i C D a) m S o y ca U E � 0 E E .. O o E U w m a m ❑ m ❑ ❑ m` 0 m o m a -Co C O W E of o 2 o v° Q U p CO (0 Fes- Z o Crj O p .- w z U W o II N 0 O Q 3c�mo 0 m = E 00 m F- LL U) u7 L i o O u� N O m Q. Q r, O r r cc6 CN m O C E c a) O O C � 2 r 2 0 0 E fC 'tA tU m LO N O N N O c'7 m N L N N = Q m cm r a) r r O (n 0 LO @ LJJ o') > V) i` r O M O _ v— O= r v r m i N C7 er cm N c N a) 0 m x co W •> ` D CA Cn ^ � O O O C E O W N O CO O Z .T. N w "7' C N J N" _ U m C M .+T-. O N N N Z W N N Cn .a N U Q7 U U Q U U �--� U C) U �' U c••) U .0 U CD o-E Fcn oLo o0 o isi d 5 o� Z o m v m OTC% O 5 m c9 rs oa O U 0 O Z Q oZ a O �cn cn c U M'9 z 7 J o U O_ 0 J O LLI a � 0 0 N L!j N tT El Q C•�1 ch erf a W N ca -d s� a� b rn C z ca O '-1 H a � H � � 7 H (U U � H Ls+ °C H WI, zIw U [C cn O o Qi� U) t- W U z Q N U m CU O L- U cc E O O U t � 3 cn L_ 3 E0 O 'i y t- CA L_ a) U Lw cu ai cm cn ° c U N m � c O � U O � L o m A O C 7 O .a m O � ra m E ca 0 � o y L IT y O` U i (ll S 3 m z ,� w �0 ¢�O H C) 0 � 0 0 0 °o 0 0 0 o I Ln z I M � C.. FA Q z ❑ �i- z O o o 0 LO 0 O o o N O 0 O O O 0 U z p N O O O T p CD CD r" N U E Cc X o - N ~ O z ❑ in } Cl) C' 7 N LO CO H- C z c� m¢ Oc� O r ,� C'7 m Q cr z O ltJ co N N C N CD ��.=r° N CD m U O O O N � O � C7 co N e7 00 Lp 0C)"a- Ln 47 N Q N CLOz N N N N N C ,� ""' C r r m T Q r r r r UO y •C �Ecu _O LU QQO LL C) U O O O L U L U H z W Q J u J Z z O O O O r O I O CO O CD O I f� m z ,� w �0 ¢�O H C) 0 W � ? 0 0 0 °o 0 0 0 o O Ln z U a M � C.. FA Q z ❑ �i- z O o o 0 LO 0 O o o N O 0 o o 0 O O 0 U z p N O U O T Ln CD CD r" N U E Cc X o - N ~ O z ❑ in } Cl) C' 7 N LO LO CD (r7 y C t= O C O C m¢ Oc� r cN m Q d• U H ��.=r° J W U O O O N M C7 co N e7 00 Lp 0C)"a- Ln 47 N N N CLOz N N N N N C ,� ""' C r r r T Q r r r r UO y •C �Ecu _O LU QQO LL C) U O O O L U L U _j u J Z z O O O O r O I O CO O CD O I f� O N O v F- O gaaQ O � co Cl) oS ti I- a co N It Lr U) LO d• O O ¢ G p Q F-Z� v• c m O U m U E N Cl) O N d O O Z 0 m z ,� w �0 ¢�O H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o (D c .o w p O 00 C-0 CISC7 = 2 E �i- z O o o 0 0 o 0 O o o O 0 O 0 o o 0 O 0 O a.. a) 0 U z p N O O O T Ln CD CD r" N U E Cc X o - N ~ O z N Cl) C' 7 N LO LO CD (r7 y C t= O C O C m¢ Oc� r cN d• U ��.=r° U O O O N M C7 co N e7 00 Lp 0C)"a- Ln 47 N N N N N N N N N C ,� ""' C r r r T r r r r r UO y •C �Ecu _O Z O L U L U ` Oa) U O U C L N I- m N •O LO •p 'q p C `n 3 m c`a L`a m v• c m O U m E O O N d O C O () W a O m` a m m m O U O m m` C p y n �Eyov n Q U p H Z d O M p m C W z Q Q p m m` -p 3 c m o r -, ❑ O w E co O o a ��c =E w cV N LO !Y I= Q. Q T t—cC C �11 LL LO r 'a y O C E U O Q O C O � T O Y Q O T O _C'.�r Co E N Co O LN IN C Lf7 C� I"�' N c0 N E c U- _� -O ? — m rn cu Q J r- m CL LN[') O co Lo c T .2 C O tq W M U m ''- Cr C6 O i z N i � U) ) O p °i� q C N N C �' y COO co Ln N O 0 E30 � N C N co C) ` c N o LO - LO � A 0 1 Qrn--o CD � O C N N N O LL N C N r U O '-' CJ 00 p O' U m U a (� ch i� L j U '� U Q U U U c U U •= m 'O 'O r 0 Q 0 .O J o to ,07 ,�„ o O N 0 CU LO 0 CU .� o— ,O > o N J o r- ... •^ us o E 3 av n cn rZ°' CL CL _ �cn acn - O aU -. c az a- U" 0 E o� z 0 m N c 00 VJ z 0 U z �a a Z y0 LL z i� Z o0 C) LL (t 0 LL U) to a Q cn 0 0 N r DI Q a> c� M M M a W cri N 'C7 N z co O .-7 H IL a� cn O H 4J C7 (Q H ca 3 W z cn H � W 00 W C O ~ I U o 0 O°0 O O j O CD O ch ) C) cc ¢ F- O N CNLo CT L � 03 Lo =) L) O � II C) m f Z W a0 m uj vC° g� o^ o^° 00 O cD fAl Ln z a X ^ C14 O cr) ¢o U � m Q O Lo (UII J WU) w 0_ OZ Z U = c`II U OWJ o f 0 C.) O O O O O O O O O Z CO � O W s Z N cr O O^ o) Q 1 J O J 3 Z F- O 0 N N N N O 00 qtt N ^ M J O) Q d p `'Z O L ¢ Q C �) M ai `' O O Q 3 m *- F- F- _ m E o •� Ln CL cn "CU O CY) 3-p Zljw C M fl m= O O O Co O O O O O U < m O O CO ~ ` O C c6 O C+ >' Q O CL �� CU C 7 o U c o m L+) E °? E o O-0 q F- O O O O O O O O O O C O y c0 -p U N N m O U X m 0 O � M ^ -2 -2 v O rn O � v cm L M M 0 m O C V q N N co Z m N 00 h M M C 7E O U = Om T EO�>. o� `~ co O to C° rn Lo coo C14 04 (D C14 co cq co coo CN coo 04 ca C14 cN CN N. C C14 03 T T T T T T T T T �E •C O � .0 Z y_ CO U o U LL O 'fl 'O -2 0 p c N .�.. 72 m 72 U •� .,0. y f09 m C U c U a a o 47 i4 > 3 3 m= 3 m y 0 m w m o m 2 m m o a g O m O` C 0 r y m o c a m Q Q y U O U) _ v¢ o-o Eio a, W Z U m N N> Tin O L cu 3o C ° m c= E co en U mU LC) �> y N LD _ N CL < U p Q T E 045 N Cl ^ c O w c,) _E- m O Lo N W y m T O c CO Q ^ Z O may. J O o Q m 4) `' G O y ^ r- O � T fD O O >'` O N ON 0 LO[) 03 O .i. O m N N E rnco N 3 00 U 7t .O > N U) �w C C m m w� �3 O s� C 0 fa cU N z N O N a. I 'O M ?. = U) -0 = N O LCD _ m cU m LU O LL .o CL E .o > o v - m m a0 v o o c i� E v v o F- Z v U O .c m •O O) O co co O` N O o N .O C (u O` ? (D O O N d y O C LLJ O 'S CL Co a U) C= a. � a o `O O a cn LL' U- cn I IL a. a p °-) E o 7 z m c) m N � T O `ate �s ¢° U 0 U 0 oQ cr O Z `O �cn D U L Q z dLU Z a0 O cc IL O Q U- 0 = UH U) O N y, m ¢ M M M a w 47 c� -b Q1 CA � z � o a H � J � O H O U�> H Gxi � H 3 rz w z cn O Q = w F- W O Z Q N (U U co "m C N U C E O O U C � 3 N L `o .3 a� E O •z cn CL U) L L a a� m s cn U cu cu c C O O O] U N L O � T Co O _ C O C O .a cu D C O O � m E cu L O L C a •- fA � O �C d � •C L t m s 3 CD '- O O I I I � 1 o O rn N M N O O U_ H O U 1- 0 (M O O LU U X =) C*7 C6 W O N ZZ� °i C) ° o cTo O U O O M O N o O cc Fm- ¢ ai a p }¢z O O Z 0 N N L w M 00 O] m U m am C/) O lf7 O (h O •" O N o T W W Z W c m J O 0 O 0 O J 0 IL 0 O Z U - J O J rn m o rn F¢- Hz� - 0 o O cn T O p<00 z U m Q Q M CL H co ti ¢o m cli cn E °? T O ❑ T 2 co C LLl U O Z Lo v co CD '- O O I I I � 1 o O rn N M N O O U_ H O U 1- O (M O O LU U X =) C*7 C6 W O N ZZ� °i C) ° o cTo mcl� 0¢ m d 2 O oo CIA CY) Z II V7 O C6 W N T N T Q F" �- z 0 O CD O C) o C) O U F- N 00 m d N z U 4 m N ai a p }¢z T to Go 0 o L w M 0 N m U m J W Z C/) O m p � O 07 O lf7 O (h O vi _ C O C •" O N o T c m J O 0 O 0 O C) � 0 O Z U - J O J rn Lo o rn F¢- Hz� - 0 a¢ T O p<00 z w F'w Om~ ° 0 0 o O o Cl O o g=)0 ¢(n 0 2'P CIA CY) O N T N T N T N T Q F" �- z O O C) o C) O U F- N 00 m d N z U 4 m N ai a o CD T to Go 0 o L o 0 N m U m � O 07 O lf7 O (h CIA CY) 0 _ O m m � O O 0 ° N T N T N T N T Z 0 a cc m o 0 U 0 o L o a) W 0o m U m co co O 07 O lf7 O (h O vi _ C O C •" O N o T � U UQ E��v° Z co U) 0 a¢ C a r Q Q OJ ti Z m cli cn E °? T O ❑ T 2 co C LLl T C00 D cn O Z Lo v co T M CN rn °' a p` U C CD = N U Z U .a U IY CD > •Q 1� .O CD z .O 'O m 'a V •C N N m 3 J O C¢D _`m n`c�n a_M acn m > 0-U.. 0 _ O m m � O O 0 ° CL a o C 'D m M E °? E-0 0 0 Cl 0 o - O Oaom o° 00 0o aoi o o UE �X co co O 07 O lf7 O (h O vi _ C O C •" O N o T � U E��v° F- A. ^ fD (0 M O a 'a - N T N T .N- N T cli G y "C O T /�• CD V O � co p` U C CD = N to o .a E 'O m 'a V •C N N m 3 O _`m 3 m m > O U m p U O m O y C O N E 3 0 < U O m a Co M O c 3 CD o° ^ m 0 0 O p ch E "m m :� Oo C> _� _0Q�� CM 7 O o U 65 O rn .- m cu a � O m r• CD R E co m m � N N O O o= co 2 M O T OV, aci c.� C N E- O 3 0 M CO O y ONTO d' m CO - E O O O c0 N N= N 0- N S •C O-0 U O 7 N m M U U O V U 0 U U C9 0 0 O a> O O m 0- c a c F( N$ w EL U) CL �Q n.cn o o� Z (O U CO Z � o � O n �? C� O Q U C U 0 oZ f Q cZ O CL y O zQ VJ o U LU z z Q O oU U- 00 J LL o W � U Q VI 0 0 N (n N 7 CT Lo cn cn Cl) a W N ca m O O H H a a' H N � O H v U H d � a H az 3 z C!� U H r-y OW�PC U Q U) uj Z W O Q p U Z Q 0 O f H U O O O �' O O O O O 1 Co U) m H d z CA M NO z Q (D N cc O CA CD J m O r Cl7 Ln Q Cn m Z W O J n om g� ° ° C:) U U LO Z x � 0o O) tfr Y CL mZ ^ U N � m Q 15 f- LO m LU z fn (A J CL Z M o m VO p E W O O ❑ m LU v 0 L) W Q Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Z 5 O U m O Q *- cc O et N c0 M r N r J J}� J pQ nM r O N ° N H z~ N 3 Q m r Q O v E o 'i (A C1 (n � L m v L CD to -0 Z W W U m (r1 m O O O O O O O O Cl ¢�O O o U CD -0 O _ L C) W C (C O 5+ >% p O — p 0 o c D ca co 5 S OU E c? E-p H Z O O O O O 00 O O O n' O U N Q Z Q O c0 'et I� c C'7 r N O r U E m X - O Q mOg O r- N ti r O O CN O Z6 U.-., N m Z m O c c O c NO O L C= O .D 'O O m .2 I-- - (n — to m O m O O O< 6- It CC) CO I.- co CA O N Cn O O Cl ;C a) iy o) C/3 N (O N r co N 00 N N N N N N A C r .0 Z m uci O M v o ca O y c m m o o 3cov a o (� E 'y -! in c m a� m m m `m c o N c v: m N t E c C 3 E E m 3 3 c `L° 3 (UV w cn > o a. m ° m m p a R CL o m ° m c o o= ° E `m o Q CA O Q 4 i- Z _v o M o m C W Z J _ (D m L tU 3 C r d 0 U) m O (N (II 3 d Q y N= m cu a Q O O Cn a E O C7 cD N O M O m O r 0 O O O y N C C Cl) E � iII O 'J iGi O Lo CO ca N EM CL' .= p O � t ,C O to CC) .- j O lf� c m Ui O O U C O¢ y m U (p O z N 8 ti U I V a O `_ (.n r U r Q) y •Q N d c .� m `5 O O N O O CO O c O ~ CB N co CO U co O O` LO d C 3 j N a' p C U) C co N N U � p O N CO co CT m N r d. co U) O co E C .•• 0 .0 U w Ua) 5 2 U 0 U CU O =- co O r O .m O 03 o ,m CD o m O (u .. U O O O ,O 6i d O Oc IL CL en a> a a > a¢ CL a `n O a' O c� m Z'o ° m N Z C O � 0 0M Q m Z O U 0 C Z � Q 2 0 Z a Q F co oU z�z 7 J 4U c LL �0 O cn UJ a ~ m � O O N U7 M M M M W a) .-1 b a� b o a H Qi L m � N v U !� H i H Q � W z C/3' U H .-r O Q � o .. W h - LU = Z 2 p J Z Q cu O F- 5 O O O O O O O fD F- F" ¢ CO M N cD N ai r co M O) -, F- z O et N r N O N co LO O O m c' r N r < } C/) Q } ❑ m W W z Lj J 0 CL gW W O O O z jI O m V COO O O i z a 0 m cl) T O O ¢ O N N ^ nm¢ CU �- U'j M J LL Cn U WJ LL o O O L) 0 0 W <? O O T CO O N O N O �- O C7 O O =0U .- Cq F- J c 3 t+ z r- O o ri co co ai co co -jj ..J ai rr < < o < Z < LO N ti N Cl) ti O. 0< � O 000 O Q< O 3 m 0 N r N 0 E O '= y D m Z W W N C = J = O O O O O O O O O c O C � F- O U a ° cc p O M C CL >^ cam D <f- O O o O O O O O O ° m o ° co N N ° M ° rn U E° x O N Z O O cl T (6C0 I-- r 00 In U'3 O C N m ui N C z m Q N N h O N CO C O O r-_ c O O C [0 O z E c3v Ucn r Ly T N T N C O U O E =CD'a O M E N nz L) O p — m '~ m °oa r`" '° iss rn rn o 0 N 2 r r r M 0 r 0 r 0 0 c o �2 Ch OU C iA eM- ,C E °? o z U- s. O v cu LOj C L N O "2 a n 0 '0 O x •� cn m y 3 3 3 E 3 cza 03 E c 3 R 3 w z O O m O m O m m O m 0 10 M C O v 5 O ° E 0 < a� V o cn 0 a cu " U¢ m = �- O co a� a °E� �Z E _ EE ° is t o� 2a)c M PCD N 0 O C, tNC� CL n N a) fL Q T �D 0 Z �- 1] = T CA O O Ui N V m 0 0 Q Z U- U Zo c T N O '- O> O cl) E O M 0¢ N N O M N— N r U) c9 cfJ to O O C W ,= a) .= Y c T' ` N r° ,.., C (n N fn O �= C nj CV C V' O) f0 �Z _C J ti O .> C to OJ �4 r O M- y O C= O Ch C T N (p r- > r O W O O a) E C .: N 0 to cn N z O.. N '- N Z O> LL ¢ _� 0 LL. Q] O> u� = W O N �' N 0 O 'O v a; U U O� Q U) O U r C) V U U V vOi '� U C U U V C U z '2 rn N o o c N o 0 N 0 a) .� 0 0 a) 0 "o _. a) M CD .o rn L' = .0 3 a_ acn aCD �� CL CLU a cn 4 c R ~ O ° c� Zz - -0 M ° ca z� O � O C m Om U Z O U 0 o Z �a Z O o U � Q s Lu � z _O °U O Op i '^ 0 V! o = a ~ in cn O O N m 2 M z O H ..a a M M a P-4 aJ b a� b C as �-7 1J w cc HI�I H a�i J � d H � 3 z � U� 1-41 O O =1 °O U W — U11 a' z ¢° U m y L U C U C E O O U L � 3 �L O '3 v � E O '� Ln CL � L rri � C U � C C O U U C � O � T _ LD O C O a ca � O � f0 cu E R L o L � O •— rn to O S 3 In i r% � O � � O O O O O O co O < r Lf> ti [7 M N H Q Z O iU') LO c z O LO Q) r ❑ ❑ r r r Lrl O} OU ¢O L11 L°n ❑ m ww �- z LU JO a. LLI O O m U O c') O z Q n U M M LL O v Z O O O M O O Cl Lo M OOD O OO r g O¢ co co LO r LO Q) (V m V r r Q N cr z w W LU Lam) z J= O O O O O O M =) 0 QUO 1- O d C .a ,O 0 0 � Ct 00 c � L U�Z O O M O m O II N QZO O LO M CD U E O r Lp co co LD LO LO Ln o M N V C F- r CD O CN N C O ❑ '- r r C p C U cn E .0 o cu F Z.-CM U � C M r V r LO r CO r r L`D O C LO M Cl) co co M O y r r r r r a E G E a O n p U }- m 9 LD C CL o m in v' > E 3 E m= 3 o a m _°i a 0 E, W E C)Z C a �¢L O M C W Z N p O 3 C O O NU o ca cNc M _ co a m U? r LL � p y c U O f` U U o O N ' O h N M c m E— c2 cD m W 4L en LO O o f (n 3 N a N c er Z O O o oO oo2S a� pUv - o c3 E E �� CD #� � m m `p p Ui> o� v U N U U O U U v m vi U a .a Ln rn a) U fD a) N O U Q a) C� W p C: a` UL m n`. lL U UL a O U Z � ca Sep -13 -2001 13:54 From-Marsh CSU RFP No. 01 -3280 - Installation & Maintemance of Street lights Collier County Florida Insurance Requinoments INSURANCE TYPE REOUIRED t-1MITS X 1. Wori(ers' Compensation X 2. Commercial General Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the 1995 I.S.O. form with no limiting endorsements. T -680 P.002/003 F -836 Page 13 16B5 Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements. Policy must include Employer's Liability with a limit of $1,000,000 each accident. Bodily Injury & Progeny Damage , $1,000,000 Single Limit Per Occurrence X 3. Indemnification: The ContractorNendor, In consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall hold harmless and defend Collier County and Its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by an employee of the named Contractor/Vendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Contractor/Vendor's obligation under this provision shall not be limited In any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the Contractor/Vendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. X 4. Automobile Liability $1,000,000 Each Occurrence Owned /Non - owned /Hired Automobile Included 6. Other Insurance as indicated below: a) Professional Liability $ -0- b) Builder's Risk $ -0- .. Sap -13 -2001 _13_54 _ _ From - Marsh CSU + T -890 P 003/003 F -936 RFP No. 01 -3Z80 — Installation & Maintenanec of 5lreet Lights Page 14 1685 Collier County Florida Insurance Requirements (Continued) X 6. Contractor shall Insure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requlrements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide the County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. X T. Collier County must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial General Liability. X 8, Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as the Certificate Holder. NOTE: The "Certificate Holder" should read as follows: Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 X 8. Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice is required. 10. The Certificate must state the Bid Number and Title. BIDDER'S AND INSURANCE AGENT STATEMENT: We understand the insurance requirements contained in these specifications, and that the evidence of said insurance may be required within five (5) business days of the award of bid. Des Icy —1 raw, C -6n Jift 110�w0 G. Signature of Bider Marsh USA Inc. Insurance geney gnature of Bidder's Agent RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Li;hts Page 15 16B5 THIS SHEET MUST BE SIGNED BY VENDOR Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida Purchasing Department PROPOSERS CHECK LIST I M P O R T A N T: Please read carefully, sign in the spaces indicated and return with your proposal. Proposer should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed: 1. The RFP has been signed. 2. The RFP prices offered have been reviewed. 3. The price extensions and totals have been checked. 4. The payment terms have been indicated. 5. Any required drawings, descriptive literature, etc. have been included. s. Any delivery information required is included. 7. If required, the amount of bid bond has been checked, and the bid bond or cashiers check has been included. 8. Any addenda have been signed and included. 9. The mailing envelope has been addressed to: Purchasing Director Collier County Government Center Purchasing Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 lo. The mailing envelope must be sealed and marked with: • RFP Number; • RFP Title; • Opening Date 11. The RFP will be mailed or delivered in time to be received no later than the specified opening date and time. (Otherwise RFP cannot be considered.) ALL COURIER DELIVERED BIDS /RFPS MUST HAVE THE BID /RFP NUMBER AND TITLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE COURIER PACKET. �VI, Coj,npany Nape n S; , 6 ature &Title " -jL3 lu V c �✓ + �� � ' RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Declaration Statement Page 16 1685 FROM: D 10 IN DATE DUE: September 14, 2001 (aD 3:00 PM Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government Center Naples, Florida 34112 RE: RFP NO. 01 -3280 "Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights" Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Proposer hereby declares that he has examined the Scope of Services, and informed himself fully in regard to all conditions pertaining to the work to be done. The Proposer further declares that the only persons, company or parties interested in this Proposal or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that the Proposal is made without connection with any other person, company or companies making a Proposal; and it is in all respects fail and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The services to be furnished by us shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the Request for Proposal #01 -3280 as issued by Collier County on August 17, 2001. The undersigned do agree that should this Proposal be accepted, to execute the form of contract and present the same to the County Purchasing Director for approval within fifteen (15) days after being notified of the awarding of this contract. The undersigned do further agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of contract within fifteen (15) days will result in damages to the County. J WITNESS WHEREO�, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this day 2001 in the County of 3 ,r btO in the State of 1;,-L. . Firm's`Complete Legal Name Check one of the following: 6❑ Sole Proprietorship ] Corporation or P.A. ❑ Limited Partnership ❑ General Partnership Phone No. q� f u FAX No. q °mot) zs 0 440 ±)e_ Address City, State, Zin j BY: Typed r d Written ature --� X4 � °. Title RFP No. 01 -3280 — Installation & Maintenance of Street Lights Page 21 16B5 PROPOSAL CONTINUED . he service to be furnished by us is hereby declared and guaranteed to be in conformance with the specifications of the County. The undersigned do agree that should this Proposal be accepted, to execute the form of contract and present the same to the County Purchasing Director for approval within fifteen (15) days after being notified of the awarding of the Contract. The undersigned do further agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of contract within fifteen (15) days, will result in damages to the County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this ( day of 2001 in the County of 3 �A , in the State of i� L 0 Firm's omplete Legal Name Check one of the following: ❑ Sole Proprietorship Corporation or P.A. ❑ Limited Partnership ❑ General Partnership Phone No. 4� FAX No. Address City, Stge, ZIP and fW ritt 'Signature Title NOTE: If you choose to bid, please submit an ORIGINAL and ONE COPY of your proposal pages. RESOLUTION NO. 01- 403 A RESOLUTION TO PROHIBIT THE OPERATION OF TRUCKS AND OTHER COMMERCIAL VEHICLES HAVING A RATED LOAD - CARRYING CAPACITY IN EXCESS OF ONE (1) TON FROM THROUGH - MOVEMENTS ON CERTAIN STREETS IN THE NAPLES PARK NEIGHBORHOOD. WHEREAS, Chapter 316, Florida Statutes, permits the BCC to regulate or prohibit any classification or kind of traffic found to be incompatible with the normal and safe movements of traffic on roads and streets under its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the current construction for the widening and improvement of US 41 North from Immokalee Road (CR 846) north to Wiggins Pass Road may be cause for additional truck traffic to use the residential street system of the Naples Park Neighborhood; and WHEREAS, excessive through -truck traffic is not compatible with the existing road conditions through the Naples Park neighborhood since the streets are in fully developed residential areas and the pavement width, radii, and right -of -way width are not conducive to through -truck traffic; and WHEREAS, Eighth Street (from 91St Avenue North to 111 th Avenue North), 91s' Avenue North, 92nd Avenue North, 93rd Avenue North, 94th Avenue North, 95th Avenue North, 96th Avenue North, 97th Avenue North, 98th Avenue North, 99th Avenue North, 100th Avenue North, 101 st Avenue North, 102nd Avenue North, 103rd Avenue North, 104th Avenue North, 105th Avenue North, 106th Avenue North, and 109th Avenue North are a contiguous residential street network with roadway widths to accommodate only low traffic volumes traveling at low speeds; and WHEREAS, the BCC has determined that it will be in the best interest and benefit of the citizens of Collier County to prohibit the movement of through -truck traffic with a rated load- carrying capacity in excess of one (1) ton on certain streets in the Naples Park neighborhood for the duration of the current construction for the widening and improvement of US 41 North from Immokalee Road (CR 846) north to Wiggins Pass Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the operation of trucks and other commercial vehicles having a rated load- carrying capacity in excess of one (1) ton is hereby expressly prohibited on the following streets: Eighth Street (from 91 st Avenue North to 111 th Avenue North), 91St Avenue North, 92nd Avenue North, 93rd Avenue North, 94th Avenue North, 95th Avenue North, 96th Avenue North, 97th Avenue North, 98th Avenue North, 99th Avenue North, 100th Avenue North, 101 st Avenue North, 102nd Avenue North, 103rd Avenue North, 104th Avenue North, 105th Avenue North, 106th Avenue North, and 109th Avenue North. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that authorization is hereby given to the Collier County Transportation Services Department to erect "No Through- Truck" signs and vehicular load limit signs in accordance with Chapter 316, Sections 316.006, 316.008, and 316.189, Florida Statutes, and Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -25. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution shall be tendered to the Collier County Sheriff's Office for enforcement of the load limits established herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the effective date of the vehicular load limit shall be after written notification of the vehicular load limit is delivered to the Collier County Sheriff's Office and upon posting of appropriate signage. This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and majority vote favoring same this oP,34 day of TOB E- R, , 2001. BOARD OF�UNTY CO NERS O.Q*K,. Clerk COLLIER COUN°i -Y, . C BY: *�r" �0D DU � `C rk A �t�st K t0 GNii�y�'s JAMES` . CARTER, Ph.D., Chairman Ill,"w"e Only. Approved as to form and legal suffici ncy: v He di F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney 16C1 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 ADDENDUM NO. 2 16C3 TO AGREEMENT FOR DELIVERY AND USE OF RECLAIMED WATER FOR SPRAY IRRIGAATIION THIS ADDENDUM NO. 2 is entered into this Aa day of 2001, by and between the BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE EX- OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, ( "DISTRICT ") and WINDSTAR CLUB, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION ( "USER "). WHEREAS, USER and DISTRICT on November 18, 1987, entered into an Agreement for Delivery and Use of Treated Wastewater Effluent for Spray Irrigation to the Windstar Golf Course ( "Original Agreement "); and WHEREAS, USER and DISTRICT have determined that the Original Agreement allotment, with the passage of time, has become outdated because the Golf Course acreage to be irrigated under the Original Agreement has increased; and WHEREAS, USER and DISTRICT agree that the Agreement allotment shall be based on USER'S necessary application rate of one and a half inches (1.5 ") per acre per week in lieu of the previously agreed to application rate of 1 inch per acre per week. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the benefits derived by the DISTRICT and USER, said Original Agreement is hereby amended to increase the acreage and increase the per acre per week application rate as follows: Section 1 QUANTITY (Second paragraph at page 3 of the Original Agreement). The existing second paragraph is hereby deleted and the following paragraph is substituted in its place, as follows: "The USER'S golf course area has increased from 54 acres to 126 acres to be irrigated with effluent under this Agreement. These 126 acres represent approximately 14.15% of the 980 total acres to be irrigated under said phase I of the District's project. Allocation of the available effluent will be made on the basis of an application rate of one and a half inches (1.5 ") per acre per week ". (Fourth paragraph at page 3 of the Original Agreement). The existing fourth paragraph is hereby deleted and the following paragraph is substituted in its place, as follows: "The allocation shall be based on an irrigation application rate of one and a half inches (1.5 ") per acre per week. Applying this formula, the maximum delivery of effluent to USER under this agreement shall not exceed 750,000 GPD (gallons per day). The Agreement is not otherwise amended. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have subscribed their hands and seals effective on the day and year noted in the first sentence of this Amending Agreement. (1> Witne gnature &,.'• c A A, Printed/Typed (2)-�� Witness Signature Printed/Typed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 16C3 WINDSTAR CLUB, INCORPORATED, SUCESSOR TO USER AS COUNTRY CL1T8 OPERA OR By: •- �- resident (S' nature) Wlee- :o�5 Al, /yo Printed/Typed Na e (Corporate Seal) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this v"4-A-,e day, of 2001, bye -„_�, p , who is personally known to me as the PreN! �� �a �rindstar Club Inc., successor to Windstar Development Corporation, Co�'fl.r. �: w� Jpe 29, 2po 09 ; (Notarial Seal)g * ; - ' N•; ;• #CC729594 ; 47 ig9��•.A�BO_�dedltiN c�_:.OQa DATED: / D - @�� ` ATTEST: "11114401111% %0", DMGHT F,,PAOCK, Clerk �2 I3�eptiity;. Lust; as c a -ran' S olt ir* ly Approved as to form and legal sufficiency Thomas C.'Palmer, Assistant County Attorney .%� Notary ublic My Commission Expires: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNT WATER - SEWER DISTRICT By: ', JAMES b CARTER, Ph.D., Chairman / O - a- 3 _m � •.,•.� n4v� is T,,! �''`.,; `�j +lri1918t1»�`t 2 16C 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 405 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1996 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on August 1, 2000 adopted Resolution No. 2000 -237 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1996; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000 -237, was recorded on August 8, 2000 in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain properties for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1996; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in Official Records a Satisfaction of Liens on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1996 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessments for the following account numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 2000- 236, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 23304 This Resolution adopted after this a34day of Cft7T-03E2, 2001 after motion, s.,wn'd, ' "d'rra4jorityvote. 3A"TED /.a� 3 �41 BOARD OF COUNTY CO ISSIONERS ATE; COLLIER gQ7btqY, FLO n`1VIGHT- F�RbCK, CLERK �,. - BY: AOFMVI Ins iti 1 t7qan ' S James Warter, PH. D, Chairman A rii�!rnr�r�rl x�'�1� f�YV�1-�5i� only • lag ncy: 2877171 OR: 2914 PG: 1700 RECORDED A OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL avid eigel 10/25/2001 at 01:03PN DVIGR E. BROCI, CLERK County Attorney RBC FBB 6.00 RetA: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EIT 1240 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 61737120001 * ** 2877172 OR: 2914 PG: 1701 RICORDID in OFFICIAL RICORDS Of COLLIIR COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:03PK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLIRK RIC FIB 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLIRK TO THI BOARD INTIROFFICI 4TH FLOOR IIT 7240 1 6 C 4 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Weeks, Sterling E =& Ethel D PO Box 9463 Naples, FL 341019463 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES FARM SITES N 82.5FT OF S 247.5FT OF W1/2 OF TR 40 UNREC A/D OR 933 PG 193 Folio No. 61737120001 Project No. 66000 Account No. 23304 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs executipn and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this &3`—day of Oo—'ra 8 E2 , 2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. ORQCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI SIONERS COLLIER CO , FLORI Chas ES D RTER, Ph. D., AIRMAN Appr6�ed as to forMgmotw'e only. and legal sufficiency RO ER ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 2877181 OR: 2914 PG: 1710 RECORDED In OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER CODETi, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:03PK DWIGHT E. BROCL, CLERK REC FEE 10.50 Retn: COPIES 2.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE c' 6 8 %4 9140 C SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: JOHN F. SACKRIDER, SR, 533 KETCH DRIVE NAPLES, FL 33940 The Lien was recorded on 25" day of July 1995, in Official Record Book 2083, Page(s) 0926, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of two thousand five hundred dollars and no cents ($2,500.00), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PARCEL 10, INDUSTRIAL VILLAGE TWO, PART OF THE NE' /4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST' /4 CORNER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE EAST AND WEST' /4 LINE OF SAID SECTION 11, NORTH 89 030'40" EAST, 2,647.83 FEET TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH' /4 LINE OF SAID SECTION 11, AS SURVEYED; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH AND SOUTH' /4 LINE NORTH 00 024'17" WEST, 1,316.75 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH % OF THE NORTHEAST' /4 OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89 028918" EAST, 401.02 FEET FOR A PLACE OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH 00 031'42" WEST, 165.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF A ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 89 028'18" EAST, 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 031'42" EAST, 165.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 028'18" WEST, 100.00 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, BEING PART OF THE SOUTH 330.00 FEET OF THE NORTH' /2 OF THE NORTHEAST'/40F SAID SECTION 11, AND SUBJECT TO A ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER THE NORTHERLY 15.00 FEET. AS DESCRIBED IN THAT DOCUMENT RECORDED IN OR BOOK 947, PAGE 208 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 00253880006 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full Satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. OR: 2914 PG: 1711 16C 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this day of �kT�13� (� , 2001. ATTE,,� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND " .0 • AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF 4� to THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER ChaIrman'DISTRIC. ROBERT ZACHARY JAMES' . CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN l o/a 3/O % y t:i4iiwariil lam: This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 *** 2877182 OR: 2014 nr. 1712 *** 1 V GJl`t rv• lllG RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:03PN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLIRK RIC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Reta: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 47H FLOOR 1 C 5 BIT 9240 _ SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: EVE N. BLANCO, 5238 MCCARTY ST NAPLES, FL 33962 The Lien was recorded on 17T" day of November, 1994, in Official Record Book 2003, Page(s) 0862, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of one thousand three hundred fourty dollars and no cents ($1,340.00), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 10, BLOCK 14, NAPLES MANOR, UNIT 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 57, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS DESCRIBED IN THAT DOCUMENT RECORDED IN OR BOOK 1553, PAGE 755 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62047600003 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full Satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman,..,directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this -day of 0�-oQEl2 , 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WIGHI F. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE -- GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND ;' ' ' �• �- • AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF r— THE COLLIER COUN WATER -SEWER Attest as to gNiry�'= IC� si9"atw -* DISTRICT--., ROBER,rZACHARY JAME9W CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN r a. Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 877183 OR: 2914 PG: 1713 RECORDED R 10/15/2001 at 02:03PNDWIGHT Bf Y, FL BROCK, CURE RIC 111 10.50 Retn: COPIES 2.00 CLERK TO TH h C r INTEROFFICEE BOARDS FLOOR 1 `� 6 BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: James R. Young, a single man 3424 Timberwood Cr Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 20`h day of January, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 001907 Page(s) 000427, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Seventy Five Cents ($1,500.75) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, SAID POINT BEING A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF A 100 FOOT COLLIER COUNTY CANAL RIGHT - OF -WAY; THENCE SOUTH 89 026'31" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 100.05 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID CANAL RIGHT -OF -WAY; THENCE NORTH 1 009'42" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 590.81 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 88 050'18" EAST 94.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 000'00" EAST 31.04 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL 3424 HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 45 000'00" EAST 31.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 000'00" EAST 51.25 FEET THENCE NORTH 45 000'00" WEST 31.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 000'00" WEST 51.25 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL 3424 HEREIN DESCRIBED; CONTAINING 1,591 SQUARE FEET OF LAND MORE OR LESS; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. FOLIO NUMBER: 00258967128 *** OR: 2914 PG; 1714 * ** Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby16C acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, dire execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 231— day of CdMbAE2 , 2001. ATTEST:. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ...... K, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE ^� ' ). C GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER �. - COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE Ch�1r'sanf s GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER DISTRICT a aril -SEWER lkpproveds 3rr_ legal ROBERT C RY JAME . CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 2877184 OR: 2914 PG: 1715 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:03FN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE INTBROFFICB BIT 1240 BOARD / ^ '`„�' 6 4TH FLOOR (v'1 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Endless Summer R.V. Estates LTD., A Florida Limited Partnership 1 Radio Road Naples, FL Owners mailing address 4000 Town Center Suite 555 Southfield, MI 48075 -1410 Bearing the date of the 17th day of May, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 001948 Page(s) 002375, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Ten Thousand Seven Hundred twenty Dollars and No Cents ($10,720.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EAST % OF THE EAST % OF THE SOUTHEAST' /. OF THE SOUTHEAST' /. OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 00295160001 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. * ** OR: 2914 PG: 1716 * ** IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier Cclt C Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, dirqcts execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ,9.34J day of tjo,�A 62 2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK a Si 'are Only. Appro .is taform and legal ..su gcjoah �,. ROBERT HARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAMES EVCARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN r; , Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 2877185 OR: 2914 PG: 1717 RICORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER 10/25/2001 at 02:03PK DWIGHT E. BROCK, RBC FBI Retn: COPIES CLERK TO THE BOARD IRTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR1 6 C SIT 7140 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND/OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Thomas Patrick Serbu 3438 Timberwood Cir Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 14`hday of December, 1993, recorded in Official Record Book 001895 Page(s) 000796, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Seventy five Cents ($1,500.75) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PART OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, SAID POINT BEING A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF A 100 FOOT COLLIER COUNTY CANAL RIGHT - OF -WAY; THENCE SOUTH 89 026'31" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 100.05 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID CANAL RIGHT -OF -WAY; THENCE NORTH 1 109'42" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 437.71 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EASTERLY LINE NORTH 88 053'27" EAST 40.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL 3438 HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 88 053'27" EAST 31.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 1 006'33" EAST 51.25 FEET THENCE SOUTH 88 053'27" WEST 31.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 1 006'33" WEST 51.25 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF PARCEL 3438 HEREIN DESCRIBED; FOLIO NUMBER: 00258967306 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. COUR", FL CLERK 10.50 2.00 * ** OR: 2914 PG: 1718 * ** The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction oleo C 6 in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ,13 '`4 day of (_)0_TD6 L2 , 2001. q'; ".' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS `DVI/IC7k1T {E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER ``;���c� •� COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER OR.�y• }f9 COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT App±oued,ps,16 form and legal su 41- R BER CHARY JAMES D. CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN y d „* Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 2877186 OR: 2914 PG: 1719 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 1012512001 at 02:03PN DWIGHT B. BROCE, CLERK RIC FBI 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 6C 6 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: John F. Sackrider, Sr. 2172 Corporation Blvd. Naples, FL Whose mailing address is 533 Ketch Drive Naples, Florida 33940 Bearing the date of the 91h day of November 1995, recorded in Official Record Book 2119 Page(s) 2002, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety One Dollars and Seventy Eight Cents ($2,891.78) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PARCEL 10, INDUSTRIAL VILLAGE TWO, PART OF THE NE' /4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST' /4 CORNER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE EAST AND WEST' /4 LINE OF SAID SECTION 11, NORTH 89 °30'40" EAST, 2,647.83 FEET TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH' /4 LINE OF SAID SECTION 11, AS SURVEYED; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH AND SOUTH' /4 LINE NORTH 00 024'17" WEST, 1,316.75 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH % OF THE NORTHEAST'/40F SAID SECTION 11; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89 028'18" EAST, 401.02 FEET FOR A PLACE OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH 00 031'42" WEST, 165.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF A ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 89 028'18" EAST, 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 031'42" EAST, 165.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 028'18" WEST, 100.00 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, BEING PART OF THE SOUTH 330.00 FEET OF THE NORTH' /2 OF THE NORTHEAST'/40F SAID SECTION 11, AND SUBJECT TO A ROAD AND UTILITY EASEMENT OVER THE NORTHERLY 15.00 FEET. AS DESCRIBED IN THAT DOCUMENT RECORDED IN OR BOOK 947, PAGE 208 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 00253880006 * ** OR; 2914 PG: 1720 * ** 16C 6 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this a3 � day of Od-TvA E2 , 2001. D.WIPI , E -. ' BRQCK;- CLERK :t . i tir #.t !' ='60 d App as. to suffi ROBERT ZAC 4r an' i and legal) A BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAMES'D. CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN + 16 IJ ii b�W v ,f fY r ���'vi it E't i11V -,SAE Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 2877187 OR: 2914 PG: 1721 RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:03PN DWIGHT B. BROCI, CLBRB 6 .f10 RBC FBI Retn: COPIBS 1 .00 CLBRB TO TH8 BOARD / ^ INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR 6 !u' f6 BIT 9240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Edward Robison 4021 Harvest Ct Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 17th day of December, 1993, recorded in Official Record Book 001896Page(s) 000997, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Seventy Five Cents ($1,500.75) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 64, UNIT 2, LAKE KELLY, A SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 93, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FOLIO NUMBER: 53352120009 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this a.34 day of 1Q&r&6 EZ_ , 2001. ATTEST:' " 6WIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK a Att ft aw to CM1 n's slgnatoi "ly. Apptpwt. a 'to form and legal suff . ROBERT Z C -MARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 *** 2877188 OR: 2914 PG: 1723 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:03PK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FIE 6.00 Retn; COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD � C INTEROFFICE 4TH FL00l 6 BI? 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Richard Lawrence Kniebes, a single man 5366 Holland St. Naples, FL 34113 Bearing the date of the 23`d day of July, 1993, recorded in Official Record Book 1849 Page(s) 000534, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Dollars and Five Cents ($1,260.05) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 17, BLOCK 8, NAPLES MANOR EXTENSION, A SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1010, PAGE 1658, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62205920004 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, "bty acrbQn of the Board thisa34day of A��r-m�Eft, 2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BLOCK, CLERK AprrrBVe8Pa17to orm and legal ROBERT CHARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2877189 OR: 2914 PG: 1724 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:03PK DWIGHT B. BROCI, CLERK RBC FIB 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Reta: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLO BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Clairavan E. Kaho and Maria Kaho husband and wife 5345 Hardee St Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 3rd day of February, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 001911 Page(s) 001971, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and seventy five Cents ($1,500.75) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 29, BLOCK 8, NAPLES MANOR ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGES 67 AND 68, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62096800003 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, direpts execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this R3w day of OL'TO 6 12001. ATTEST"'""' I , DWIGHT•' : °BRt C,K, CLERK Attest Ai: t0 , Clay matt' S Apprtwed as to fails and legal ROBERT,-ZACHARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT ,d� @�B41f�1 Al JAMES CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2877190 OR; 2914 PG; 1725 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:03PN DWIGHT B. BROCI, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 6 C 6 BIT 1240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Heriberto Gonzalez and Noemi Gonzalez, husband and wife 2940 Randall Circle Naples, FL Owners Mailing Address P.O. Box 10191 Naples, FL 33941 Bearing the date of the 28th day of July, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 001972 Page(s) 000105, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Thousand Forty One Dollars and Twenty Five Cents ($2,041.25) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 21, ARLINGTON TERRACE, PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 64, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 22420800004 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisA � day of OBE i2 , 2001. e BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DW*f4T .1 (O I ;; LERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE .; Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2877191 OR: 2914 PG: 1726 * *' RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25 /1001 at 02 :03PK DWIGHT B. BROCL, CLERK RBC FIB 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLO BIT 1240 6 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Paul E. Geyer and Haydee S. Geyer, his wife 4629 -4631 Lombardy Lane 4701 -4703 Lombardy Lane Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 10`h day of September, 1993, recorded in Official Record Book 1864 Page(s) 001882, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Five Thousand Fifty Three Dollars and Thirty Five Cents ($5,053.35) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOTS 27 AND 28, BLOCK 2, AVALON ESTATES, UNIT 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 62, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 22622400008 & 22622440000 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action oft�e,Board this,0 day of&!TD13t t2 , 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 10WIGHT EP BROLK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER �—�— COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE A_` `t0 CiNiroan's GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER ` COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT sto only. Apprbved 8s to form and legal suffi ' M1 ROBER HARY JAMS . CARTER, Ph. D., Af RA '4 IV' f Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2877192 OR; 2914 PG; 1727 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02 :03PN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FIB 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THB BOARD INTBROFFICS 4TH FLOOR 16C 6 MIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Balbino V. Escobedo and Maria Escobedo husband and wife 5341 Hardee Street Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 25th day of March, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 001928 Page(s) 000378, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Seventy Five Cents ($1,500.75) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 30, BLOCK 8, NAPLES MANOR ADDITION, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND SUBJECT TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGES 67 AND 68, IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62096840005 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, t yr faction of the Board thisa3,v) day of dlf".Ta J3 EJ?—' , 2001. EST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Y= 1/1/1GHT E. BI QC _,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE t� -;Ate it.'S GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER .tt-thai rain �gA�t4E�eltiY. COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT Approver[ at to form and legal suff _ V L ROBERT HARY JAMES ARTER, Ph. D., CHAUF�AIbAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2877193 OR: 2914 PG: 1728 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02 :03PK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC 111 6.00 COPIBS 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 6 C 6 B %T 1240 �✓ SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Robyn Leeanne Daniels and Angela Elaine Daniels 5349 Hardee St Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 24`h day of January, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 001908Page(s) 000047, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand FiveHundred Dollars and Seventy Five Cents ($1,500.75) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 28, BLOCK 8, NAPLES MANOR ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEROF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGES 67 AND 68, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62096760004 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien,, by,,, agtion of the Board this day of d)C?'D Q C fc , 2001. A,Ti ST ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS qvv* -I i T;. E. BRQC A CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER ���• COUNTY AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLI.'` •'' ti�A�tW"kt1y. COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRIC' Apprbddd As tdJ6rm and legal sufffi �• ROBERf ZAeHARY JAMES CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMf41�j�„ '•�'..c�' Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 *** 2877194 OR; 2914 PG! 1729 **J RICORDBD in 10/25/2001 OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL at 02:03PK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FL00� BIT 1240 6C 5 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Bruce G. Wood 180 Cape Sable Dr Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 71 day of Jamuary, 1992, recorded in Official Record Book 1677Page(s) 000306, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of OneThousand FiveHundred Dollars and Thirty Cents ($1,500.30) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 20, BLOCK A, NAPLES MOBILE ESTATES PER PLAT IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 91, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62361000004 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, direpts execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien'; bq'�tfion of the Board this day of dXT -043EK , 2001. A-!'TEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ,DWIGHT E. BROOK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE to C trns s! j l'Ure Only. Approved as• to form and legal suffwinev- -� ROBERT ZACHARY GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAME - . CARTER, Ph. D.;'6HA MAN a Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 *** 2877195 RECORDED in OFFICIAO BCOR291 CO�v: 1730 *** IER 10/25/2001 at 02:03PN DWIGHT E. BROCK, RBC FBI COPIES Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C IXT 1240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Bruce Wood Houchin St 5800 -5700 Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 14"day of December, 1993, recorded in Official Record Book 001895 Page(s) 000812, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Five Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Five Dollars and No Cents ($5,575.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: THE EAST'/ OF THE EAST % OF THE WEST'/: OF THE NORTHEAST '/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH 660 FEET THEREOF AND LESS THE NORTH 555.68 FEET THEREOF, ALSO LESS AN EASEMENT OVER THE WEST 30 FEET FOR PRIVATE ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY PURPOSES, GRANTING INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR ADJACENT PROPERTIES. FOLIO NUMBER: 00244560005 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. COUNTY, FL CLERK 6.00 1.00 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Li.enti, by,action of the Board this 3Z- day of 00-Tb 18 Ek, 2001. ST: ` ' F„ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I6WJG13fi ff BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE " GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE AttA»<t f�sf tO Claiir�atn'S GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER 4qf� �� � COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTR (; `T Appro s orm a d legal �® sufficienc ��� ti1lli ROBERT ZACFfARY JAMES gVCARTER, Ph. D., CFtAf2MAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2877206 OR: 2914 PG: 1763-*** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:18PN DWIGHT B. BROCL, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Reta: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR l C b BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Glen A. Lange II, a married man 5461 Catts St. Naples, FL Bearing the date of the 15'h day of February, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 001915Page(s) 000074, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Seventy Five Cents ($1,500.75) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 21, BLOCK 14, NAPLES MANOR ADDITION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGES 67 AND 68, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62103560003 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this'` -°D day of 0&nil Ole- , 2001. A TE�1i" b'V'V1.GHT E�. _Bk( CK, CLERK tMt'tQN Approved as 14i -fbrm and legal sufficien'Lu:� ROBERT ZACHARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT 16C8'� AGREEMENT THIS AGREENIEN -7, made and entered into on this 23rd day of October, 2001, by and between Water Treatment and Controls Company, hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County ": WITNESSETH: 1. COMMENCEMENT. This Agreement shall commence on the date of the issuance of a Purchase Order The contract shall terminate on October 31, 2002. The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for two (2) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. The County Manager, or his designee, may, at his discretion, extend the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for up to one hundred eighty (180) days. The County Manager, or his designee, shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall perform chlorinator equipment maintenance in accordance with the terms and conditions of the specifications of Bid #01 -3263 and the contractor's proposal hereto attached and made an integral part of this agreement. 3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit price, together with the cost of any other charges/ fees submitted in the proposal. Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided sufficient funds are included in their budget(s). 4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the Contractor at the following Address: Page 1 168 i James Bindsc-iadler Water Treatment ek Controls Co. 25 West Lakeview Avenue, Suite 2 Eustis, FL 32726 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Service Agreement must be in writing. 5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. 6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County. All non - County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. 7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty -four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence Page 2 16C8 operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the Countv. 8. - 7_- 7RMJNATIOi'*i. Should the contrac`cr be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Agreement, the County may terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the Countv may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a seven (7) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non - performance. 9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non -Owned Vehicles and Employee Non - Ownership. C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County 30 days prior to any expiration date. There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. Contractor shall insure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. Page 3 16C8 11. II\1DEiVTl\,1pTCATT0N. The Contractor/ Vendor, in consideration of One T Iundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this docume nt, shall mold ha=,dess and defend jollier County and its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorneys' fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shah also pertain to any claims brought against the County by any employee of the named Contractor/ Vendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Contractor/ Vendor's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the Contractor/ Vendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first One Hundred dollars ($100.00) of money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. Page 4 1658 12. CONTRACT AD-MINISTRATION. 7-his Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Water Department. 13. COMFONEiNT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Ccntract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Prcrcosal, Insurance Certificate, and Bid #01 -3203 Specifications. 14. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. :Dwight l .e*ock, Clerk of Courts :-a :BV: -� . \�I'r -J�� Da`� *; .SL) Attest as to Chairman's signature only. Raymond F. Ross II TType/ print witnessnameT Witness BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA �� By: Chairman 1612JI01 Water Treatment and Controls Company Contractor Rojer J. Beuc, General Manager Typed signature and title Mary -Ellen Weise Dated: TType/ print witness nameT Approved as to form and lega Assistant Co Attorney Page 5 October 30, 2001 CORPORATE SEAL (corporations only) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERTNMENT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION PURCHASING BUILDING NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8425 FAX (941) 732 -0844 ...... ............. http://co.collier.fl.us DATE: July 5, 2001 TO: Prospective Bidders FROM: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M.' Public' Utilities Purchasing Agent RE: BID 01- 3253 -- "Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance" The Board of County Commissioners, the Water and Wastewater Departments, desires to receive proposals for the above - referenced services. Please refer to the Public Notice contained in the enclosed proposal package for the time and date of the Opening of this Bid. If you have any immediate questions regarding the specifications or intended work, or if you have procedural questions, you may contact me at 941/732 -2667 or by e-mail at Ly_nWood 9sn1 ergoy_net____ Information on this bid may also be found on our website http://co.collier.fl.us/purchasing. We look forward to your participation in this bid process. CC: Steve Lang, North Water Plant Dennis Barnard, North Wastewater Plant Pam Libby, Water Distribution Jim Foster, South Water Plant NOTE: If you choose to bid, please submit an ORIGINAL and ONE COPY of your proposal pages. Bid No. 01 -3263 — Chlorinator Equipment \Maintenance Page 2 16C8 NON-ENDOER'S RESPONSE B3 :. For purposes of maintaining an accurate bidder's list and facilitating your firm's response to our invitation for bid, we are interested in ascertaining reasons for prospective bidder's failure to respond to invitations for bids. If your firm is not responding to this bid, please indicate the reason(s) by checking an appropriate item (s) listed below and return this form to the Purchasing Department, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Purchasing Building, Naples, FL 34112. Please indicate "NO BID" on the outside of the envelope. We are not responding to this invitation for bid for the following reason(s): ❑ Items or materials requested not manufactured by us or not available to our company; ❑ Our items or materials do not meet specifications; ❑ Circle one - Specifications were: Not clearly understood, Not applicable, Too vague, Too rigid, Quantities too small, or ❑ Incorrect address used. Please correct: Other reason(s): Name of Firm: Mailing Address: City, State, ZIP: Phone ( ) By: Signature of Representative FAX ( Bid NIo. 01 -3263 —Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance Page 3 PUELIC NOTICE i6C8'a Sealed proposals for chlorinator equipment maintenance will be received at the Collier County Purchasing Director's Office, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Purchasing Building, Naples, FL 34112, untii 2:30 p.m., Collier County Time on July 24, 2001. BID #01 -3253 "Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance" Any questions regarding these specifications or intended work may be directed to Lyn Wood, Purchasing Department, 941/732 -2667. All bids shall be made upon the Official Proposal Form attached to the specifications, which may be seen at the Office of the Purchasing Director, and which may be had by bona fide bidders. Collier County does not discriminate based on age, race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability or marital status. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: /s/ STEVE CARNELL Steve Carnell, CSM Purchasing Director Publicly posted in the lobby of the Purchasing Building on July 5, 2001. Bid Igo. 01 -3253 — Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance 'Page 4 16C8 GENERAL BIDDING REQUIREMENTS Collier County's Certificate of Exemption ( #21- 07- 01995- 1 . All bids must be made on the proposal form furnished by 53C) upon contract award. the County. No bid will be considered unless the proposal form is properly signed. 2. Vendors must provide unit prices any time unit prices are requested in the units requested. These unit prices must be proper and balanced so as to allow fair adjustments in quantities as required by the County. All prices will remain firm for a period of ninety (90) days from date of bid opening. 3. Any transportation and/or any other charges incurred in delivering the product as specified must be included in the bid price. FOB destination shall apply unless exception is made in the specifications. 4. Any discounts or terms must be shown on the proposal form. Such discounts, if any, will be considered and computed in the tabulation of the bids. In no instance should terms for less than 15 days payment be offered. 5. Proposers taking exception to any part or section of these specifications shall indicate such exceptions on a separate sheet entitled "EXCEPTIONS TO SPECIFICATIONS ". Failure to indicate any exceptions shall be interpreted as the proposers intent to fully comply with the specifications as written. 5. The County reserves the right to formally amend and/or clarify the requirements of the bid specifications where it deems necessary. Any such addendumiclarification shall be in writing and shall be distributed to all parties who received the original bid specifications and are eligible for consideration prior to the deadline for submission of proposals. 7. The County reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive defects in the form of bid, also to select the bid that best meets the requirements of the County. 8. All bids shall be in the hands of the County Purchasing Direction, Collier County Government Compiex, General Services Building, Naples, FL 34112, by the date and time as stated in the Legal Notice. No late bids can or will be accepted. 9. All bids must be placed in a sealed envelope, and plainly marked as follows: (1) The date and time of receipt of the bids by the County Purchasing Director. (2) The number of the bid and the bid title for which the bidder submitting the bid. However, under no circumstances shall any part of or pertaining directly to the bidder's offer, be exposed on the outside of the bid offer. Special Note: All bids sent by courier service must have the bid number and title on the outside of the courier packet. 10. Collier County, Florida as a political subdivision of the State of Florida, is exempt from the payment of Florida sales tax to its vendors under Chapter 212, Florida Statutes. All successful bidders will be provided a copy of Corporations, individuals and other entities are impacted by Chapter 212, Florida Statutes according to the type of service, sale of commodity or other contractual agreement to be made with Collier County. By submittal of a properly executed response to a bid proposal from Collier County, Florida, the bidder is acknowledging that he is aware of his statutory responsibilities for sales tax under Chapter 212, Florida Statutes. Collier County is also exempt from most Federal excise taxes. By submittal of a properly executed response to a bid proposal from Collier County, Florida, the bidder is acknowledging that he is aware of his responsibilities for Federal excise taxes. 11. Tangible personal property purchased by Contractors in the performance of realty construction for the County is taxable, though the County is exempt on its own purchases. 12. In case of identical bids tying as low bid, the County shall ask vendors to submit certification that they have a drug - free workplace in accordance with Section 287.087 Florida Statutes. Should all vendors provide said certification, the County will give local vendor preference. 13. Permits, Licenses, Taxes: In compliance with Section 218.80, F. S., all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U.S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. 14. The County reserves the right to accept item or group of items of this bid, unless the bidder qualified his bid by specific limitations. 15. The County reserves the right to award any item or groups of items to more than one vendor on any bid unless otherwise noted in the bid specifications. 16. Alternate bids will not be considered unless authorized by the Invitation for Bids. 17. Bidders on any construction project must be qualified and directly responsible for 30% or more of the Bid amount for said work. 18. Payment will be made by the County within thirty (30) days from receipt and acceptance by the County of delivery of the bid items or receipt of invoice for same, whichever is received later. 19. Any Contractor who is a recipient of County funds, or who proposes to perform an work or furnish any goods under this bid shall not discriminate against any worker, employee or applicant or any member of the public because of age race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability or marital status nor otherwise commit an unfair employment practice. Bid l lo. 01 -3263 — Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance 20. For bidders who wish to receive copies of bids after the bid opening, the County reserves the right to recover ail costs associated with the printing and distribution of such copies. 21. Any actual or prospective respondent to an Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal who is aggrieved with respect to the former, shall file a written protest with the Purchasing Director rip or to the opening of the Bid or the due date for acceptance of Proposals. All such protests must be filed with the Purchasing Director no later than 11:00 a.m. Collier County time on the advertised date for the opening of the Bid or the acceptance date for the Request for Proposals. 22. Bid award selection criteria is as follows: a. All questions on the Proposal Page shall be answered as to price(s), time requirements, prompt payment terms [discounts], required document submissions and acknowledgment of addenda received. b. Award shall be based upon the responses to all questions on the Proposal Page. C. Further consideration will include but not be limited to references, completeness of bid response and past performances on other County bids /projects. d. Prices will be read in public exactly as written on the Proposal Page at the time of the bid opening; however, should an error in calculations occur whenever unit pricing and price extensions are requested, the unit price shall prevail. Mathematical miscalculations may be corrected by the County to reflect the proper answer. 23. Award of contract will be made by the Board of County Commissioners in public session. Awards pertaining to the Collier County Airport Authority will generally be made by that agency's approval Board. Award shall be made in a manner consistent with the County's Purchasing Policy. Award recommendations will be posted outside the offices of the Purchasing Department on Wednesdays and Thursdays. Any actual or prospective respondent who desires to formally protest the recommended contract award must file a notice of intent to protest with the Purchasing Director within two (2) calendar days (excluding weekends and County holidays) of the date that the recommended award is posted. Upon filing of said notice, the protesting party will have five (5) days to file a formal protest and will be given instructions as to the form and content requirements of the formal protest. A copy of the "Protest Policy" is available at the office of the Purchasing Director. 24. All firms are hereby placed on NOTICE that the County Commission does not wish to be lobbied... either individually or collectively... about a project for which a firm has submitted a proposal. Firms and their agents are not to contact members of the County Commission for such purposes as meetings of introduction, luncheons, dinners, etc. During the bidding process, from bid opening to final Board approval, no firm or their agent shall contact any other employee of Collier County with the exception of the Purchasing Director. Page 516C8 25. The Contractor shall employ people to work at County facilities who are neat, clean, well- groomed and courteous. 2e. If the bidder should be of the opinion that the meaning of any part of the Bidding Document is doubtful, obscure or contains errors or omissions he should report such opinion to the Purchasing Director before the bid opening date. 27. The County assumes no responsibility for proposals received after the due date and time, or at any office or location other than that specified herein, whether due to mail delays, courier mistakes, mishandling, inclement weather or any other reason. Late proposals shall be returned unopened, and shall not be considered for award. Bid Rio. 01 -3263 —Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance Page 16C8 SPECIFICATIONS These specifications are intended to provide the informaticn by which prospective bidders may understand the requirements of Collier County relative to furnishing and delivering Wastewater and Water Departments Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance. The successful bidder will provide labor and parts for semi - annual inspections, cleaning of equipment, preventative maintenance and emergency maintenance for all the chlorinator equipment at the North County Wastewater Treatment Facility, the Pelican Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility, the North and South County Regional Water Treatment Facilities and their associated re -pump stations. Equipment to be serviced under this contract is as follows: North County Wastewater Treatment Facility Wallace and Tiernan: V -2000 Chlorine Feed Systems 2 inch Adjustable Throat Injector 3 ea. 1 inch Fixed Throat Injector 1 ea. Pressure Regulator Valves 2 ea. Vacuum Regulator Valves 2 ea. Chlorine Gas Leak Detectors 2 ea. Micro 2000 Residual Analyzer for Chlorine 3 ea. Automatic Switchover 2 ea. This facility will be switching to a bleach feed system for the disinfection process upon completion of the facility expansion which is estimated to be October 1, 2001. After that date, the chlorinator equipment will be obsolete at this facility. Pelican Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility Wallace and Tiernan: V -75V2 Chlorinators 2 ea. Vacuum Regulators 3 ea. Chlorine Gas Leak Detectors 2 ea. Micro 2000 Residual Analyzer 1 ea. South County Regional Water Treatment Plant Wallace and Tiernan: V -800 Remote Vacuum Chlorinator System 2 ea. V -800 Remote Vacuum Ammonia System 1 ea. V -2000 V Notch Chlorinator System 1 ea. 60 -215 Ammoniator System 1 ea. Bid No. 0 1-3 263 — Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance SPECIFiCATIiONS (cont.) South Ca nty Regionall Water Treatment Plant (cont.) ATi Chlorine Gas Detection System 1 ea. Vacuum Regulators (026561) 2 ea. Series 50 -165 Pressure Reducing Valves 4 ea. Chlorine Injectors 2 inch 3 ea. Automatic Switchover (1 chlorine, 1 ammonia) 2 ea. 1 inch Fixed Throat Ammonia Injectors 2 ea. SS -2000 Ammonia Gas Detector 1 ea. Wallace & Tiernan Acutec 35 Gas Detection System (NH3) 1 ea. North County Regional Water Treatment Plant Chlorine System: Wallace and Tiernan: Chlorinator 1000 #, Model V -2020 2 ea. Chlorine leak Detector, Model 50 -125 2 ea. Chlorine Injector, Model V -19313 2 ea. Vacuum Regulator 500# 9 ea. Unitede: Chlorine Vacuum Switch, Model H -105 2 ea. Ammonia System Wallace & Tiernan: Ammoniator 190 #, Model V -2000 2 ea. Ammonia Leak Indicator, Model V -2005 2 ea. Ammonia Injector, Model 120.35 2 ea. Sensidyne: Ammonia Leak Indicator, Model NH3 2 ea. Manatee Re -pump Station Capital Controls: Advance Model 1411 C Compound Loop Control System with the following: Series 200 Gas Feeders (2 chlorine, 2 ammonia) 4 ea. Automatic Switchover (1 chlorine, 1 ammonia) 2 ea. Remote Flowmeter Panel (2 chlorine, 2 ammonia) 4 ea. 1410 Gas Control Valve (1 chlorine, 1 ammonia) 2 ea. 4000 Automatic Gas Feed System 1 ea. 870 Residual Analyzer 1 ea. Page 7 16C8 Bid No. 01 -3263 — Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance SPECIFICATIONS (cont.) Manatse Ra -pump Station lcont.) 1030 Gas Detector 1 ea. 1000 Chart Recorder 1 ea. 1010 Electronic indicator 1 ea. 1 inch Injector (1 chlorine, 1 ammonia) 2 ea. Goodland Re -pump Station The chlorine and ammonia systems are currently being upgraded. For a new equipment upgrade list contact Jim Foster at 941/455 -7299. Carica Re -pump Station* (50 -125) C12 Gas Detector 2 ea. 500# VAC Regulator with T. C. Kit 1 ea. V -2005 Chlorinator 2 ea. U -2747 1 inch Injector 1 ea. 60 -200 Ammoniator 1 ea. 50 -185 Ammonia Pressure Reducing Valve 1 ea. 5185 EIT TCX Alarm 1 ea. *County Water Department prefers a once a year preventative maintenance check for the Carica Re -pump Station. SCOPE OF WORK Page 8 16C8 The successful bidder will provide scheduled and emergency service and repairs including all parts, tools, equipment and appropriate personnel as necessary to complete repairs. Emergency service and other repairs shall be on a per hour, plus mileage and parts basis. All parts must be new and come from an authorized dealer. All parts and repairs must have a one (1) year warranty. The successful bidder must supply the Wastewater and Water Departments with phone numbers for emergency and routine call -out service. Routine call -outs must have a confirmed date of when service will be performed within forty -eight (48) hours. Response for emergency call -outs must be within twenty -four (24) hours of call, and emergency service must be available 365 days of the contract year. Bid No. 01 3263 — Chlorinator Equipment Maihtenance Page 9 16CB SPECIFICATIONS (ccnt.) A travel mileage and per diem fcr additional services or emergency services shall be stated for each Iccation on proposal page under, Additional Service or Emergency Round Trip Cost. Service calls other than pre - scheduled inspection, equipment cleaning or preventative maintenance shall be classified as additional or emergency service. Collier County reserves the right to change equipment manufacturers when needed. Preventative maintenance will then be charged on a time and material basis. The general criteria that will be used for the evaluation of this bid is set forth in the general bidding requirements along with the responses as stated on the bid proposal pages. Award of bid shall be made to the lowest, qualified and responsive bidder(s) based on the Grand Total. The County reserves the right to award this contract through an approach which best serves the interests of the County; i.e., to a single vendor, multiple vendors, or by a primary/secondary vendor basis. TERMS OF CONTRACT This contract will commence on the date of award by the Board of County Commissioners, and be in effect for one (1) year. CONTRACT RENEWAL The County retains the right to renew this contract, with the consent of the vendor, under the same terms and conditions for three (3) additional one (1) year periods. TERMINATION Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per Specifications, the County may terminate this Agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a seven (7) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non - performance. VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion /termination of agreement. Bid No. 01 -3263 — Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance Page 10 16CS Collier County Florida Insurance Requirements INSURANCE TYPE REQUIRED LIM17S X 1. Workers' Compensation Statutonj Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements. X 2. Commercial General Liability Bodily Iniury & Property Damage (Occurrence Form) patterned after the 1985 I. S.O. form with no limiting endorsements. $500,000 Single Limit Per Occurrence X 3. Indemnification: The ContractorNendor, in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall hold harmless and defend Collier County and its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorney's fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by an employee of the named ContractorNendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The ContractorNendor's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the ContractorNendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first Ten Dollars ($10.00) or money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. X 4. Automobile Liability $500,000 Each Occurrence Owned /Non- owned /Hired - Automobile Included 5. Other Insurance as indicated below: a) Professional Liability $ -0- b) Builder's Risk $ -0- Bid No. 0 1-3 26 3 — Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance Page l 16C8 + Cclller County ricrida Insurance Re uirernents � (Continued) X o. Ccntr ctcr shall insure that all subcontractors comply with the same insuranca requirements that he is required to meet. The same contractor shall provide the County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. X 7. Collier county must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial General Liability. X 8. Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as the Certificate Holder. NOTE: The "Certificate Holder" should read as follows: Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 X 9. Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice is required. X 10. The Certificate must state the Bid Number and Title. BIDDER'S AND INSURANCE AGENT STATEMENT: We understand the insurance requirements contained in these specifications, and that the evidence of said insurance may be required within five (5) business days of the award of bid. Bidder Signature of Bidder Insurance Agency Signature of Bidder's Agent 09/24/2001 04 :26 8633247375 WTC J BINDSCHADLER PAGE 02 . - Hid No. 01 -3263 - Chloriaaator Equipment Maintenance Pap 13 1bC8 CONTRACT PROPOSAL FROM: GYlci fe r rrea* m A + 3 C&A T DUE: ,July 24. 2001 gt 2:30 O.M. Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government Center Naples, Florida 34112 RE: BID No. 01- 3263 -- "Chlorinator Equipment Maintenance" Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as bidder, hereby declares that he has examined the specifications and informed himself fully in regard to all conditions pertaining to the work to be done for furnishing and delivering chlorinator equipment maintenance for the Wastewater and Water Departments as per the attached specifications. The Bidder further declares that the only persons, company or parses interested in this Proposal or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that this Proposal Is made without connection with any other person, company or companies submitting a Bid or Proposal; and it is all respects fair and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The Bidder proposes and agrees, if this Proposal is accepted, to contract with the County furnish work in full, in complete accordance with the attached specifications, according to the following unit prices: North County Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility Wallace and Tiernan: q D0. °0 V -2000 Chlorine Feed Systems ex. $..100. 2 inch Adjustable Throat Injector 3 ea. $ l,S oo. 1 inch Fixed Throat Injector 1 ea. 208. $ ijDo . Pressure Regulatm Yelves lea. $ Chtorti a do AS'Leslc ID ei.civr- 4rrtec ;S ZtA. $ Vemurn Regulator Valves Chlorine Gas Leak Detectors - So -13S' 208. 2 ea. Micro 2000 Residual Analyzer for Chlorine 3 ea. $ ? 00 et Automatic Switchover 3,000 ppJ Check LJ^4 Miere 96M Analyzer- ea. Pelican Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility Wallace and Tiernan: V -75V2 Chlorinators 2 ea. $..100. Vacuum Regulators 3 ea. $ Chlorine Gas Leak Detectors 546-12r 2 ea. $ ijDo . Micro 2000 Residual Analyzer lea. $ Chtorti a do AS'Leslc ID ei.civr- 4rrtec ;S ZtA. $ 09/24/2001 04:26 8633247375 WTC J BINDSCHADLER PAGE 03 16C8 Hid No. D 1.3263 — Chlorinator &0;=M MWntem= Page 14 PROPOSAL CONTINUED South Regional Water Treatment Plant Wallace and Tiernan: V-800 Remote Vacuum Chlorinator System 2 ea. $ 07. s° V-2000 V Notch Chlorinator System 1 ea. $ 00 60 -215 Ammcniator System 1 ea. $ ATI Chlorine Gas Detection System 1 ea. $ a?(aD. WE ... A n _ 4 Series 50.185 Pressure Reducing Valves a tea. $ /16 Chlorine Injectors 2 inch 3 ea. $ 4 S' Automatic Switchover (1 chlorine, 4 emmenis) 1 Zea. $� 604a Wallace & Tieman Acutec 35 Gas Detection System -- NH3 ,/ 1 ea. $ (00. C- c? to? cAlo"A= tabnent s North Rouional Water Plant Chlorine System: Wallace and Tiernan: �. Chlorinator 1000#, Model V-2020 2 ea. $ 073 Chlorine leak Detector, Model 50 -125 2 ea. Chlorine Injector, Me - .7 ",4dj Tiiroa'V 2 ea. $ 4000- — Vacuum Regulator 500# 9 ea. $ 0.0 Unitede: Chlorine Vacuum Switch, Model H -105 2 ea. $ ��D00.' Ammonia System Wallace & Tiernan: Udl� Ammoniator 190#, Model V-2000 2 ea. Ammonia Injector,e�eh4P9: -36 i `� t4in 10' Vacua M e�� la In r 2 ea. I C4 Sensidyne: Aot Ammonia Leak Indicator, Model NH3 2 ea. $4060. Manatee Re -pump Station Capital Controls: Sec S e am f c 5Ate.+ Advance Model 1411 C Compound Loop Control %� System with the following: /;a, / 4V'47EL R`-p m? So, 09/24/2001 04:26 8633247375 WTC J BINDSCHADLER PAGE 04 r Manatee Re -Pump Station Pricing Prominent metering pumps Model# 04BO806TTI 2each � �, �O�• � Prominent metering pumps Model# VAMB12017PVT teach a 2000 Chlorine Analyzers teach AIL Acutec 35 beak Detector teach •t 09/24/'2691 04:26 8633247375 WTC J BINDSCHADLER PAGE 05 16C8 Bid No. 01 -3263 - Chioriaator Equipment Maintenance Page 15 PROPOSAL CONTINUED Manatee Re -pump Station (cant) Goodiand Re -pump Station Wallace & Tieman: Micro/2000 analyzer 2 ea. V10K Gas Feed System lea. Acutec 35 Gas Detection System 1 ea. 200 ppd Vacuum Regulator 41 ea. r AJ Hi Carica Re -pump Station' KUM (50 -125) C12 Gas Detector 2 ea. 500# VAC Regulator with T. C. IQ 1 ea. V-2006 Chlorinator 2 ea. U -27471 inch Injector 1 ea. Goodiand Re -pump Station Wallace & Tieman: Micro/2000 analyzer 2 ea. V10K Gas Feed System lea. Acutec 35 Gas Detection System 1 ea. 200 ppd Vacuum Regulator 41 ea. r AJ Hi Carica Re -pump Station' (50 -125) C12 Gas Detector 2 ea. 500# VAC Regulator with T. C. IQ 1 ea. V-2006 Chlorinator 2 ea. U -27471 inch Injector 1 ea. 60 -200 Ammoniator 1 ea. 50-185 Ammonia Pressure Reducing Valve 1 ea. 5185 EIT TOX Alarm 1 ea. 'County Water Department prefers a once a year preventative maintenance check for the Carica Re -pump Station. Discount for parts shall be discounted from the Current Published Price list Add' 'onai Service and Ema_raencv Regmim Service Technicians Hourly Rate service Technicians Overtime Hourly Rate Mileage Cost for North County Regional Wastewater Facility so? '000. $, �S s 6_3.395. b % off �Y- $q7. 90 $ 00. RA 09/24/2001 04:26 8633247375 WTC J BINDSCHADLER Bid No. 01 -3263 — C Aminat" Equipment MduftaMe PROPOSAL CONTINUED Additional Services or Emergency Round Trio iMileme Coats (cont.) __ PAGE 06 1608 Page 16 Mileage Cost for South Regional Water na Treatment Facility $� t7 Mileage Cost for North Regional Water oa ���• '"' Treatment Facility $ Mileage Cost for Pelican Bay Wastewater o0 ��p• Treatment Facility $ Mileage Cost for Manatee Re -pump Station $ a% Mileage Cost for Goodland Re -pump Station $��• Mileage Cost for Carica Re -pump Station $ a I D do OVern i - A+ Ex/�ert SeS 5'O• °—° per- 0100 a s' s s 09/24/2001 04:26 8633247375 WTC J BINDSCHADLER Bid No. 01 -3263 — CM"ii a Equipment MainteMM Page 17 PROPOSAL CONTINUED PAGE 07 16C8 Any discounts or terms must be shown on the Proposal Form. Such discounts, if any, will be considered and computed in the tabulation of the bids. In no instance should terms for less than 15 days payment be offered. Prompt Payment Terms: '' % Days; Net 30 Days Addenda received (if applicable): #1 #2 #3- The service to be furnished by us is hereby declared and guaranteed to be in conformance with the specifications of the County. The undersigned do agree that should this Proposal be accepted, to execute the form of contract and present the same to the County Purchasing Director for approval within fifteen (15) days after being notified of the awarding of the Contract. The undersigned do further agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of contract within fifteen (15) days, will result in damages to the County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto su scribed our names on this day of See ie btr , 2001 in the County of C , in the State of L- . %e r -rreo f#h eA t r Cori ova A Co, Firm's Complete Legal Name Check one of the following: ❑ Sole Proprietorship r Corporation or P.A. ❑ Limited Partnership ❑ General Partnership Phone No. Sa' 0?4►7- 3a,2 3sa- &ln- i a y FAX No. Z - 32 s-1 - 73 S" (or) 3s' .2 • ydr3- q 337 . Address S lJ l- EAE yI NJ Ve ._Sa fe oZ City, State, zip ws4fs Typed and Written Signature Title ' Ca RD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE D PRODUCER RI 410- 339 -7263 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTCR OF INFORMATION Riggs, Counselman, Michaels L4L ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE Downes, Inc. HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW, 555 rairmcunt Avenue Baltimore, MD 21286 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED ' Water Treatment &Controls INSURER A: Hartford Insurance Companies Company INSURER B: 25 W. Lakeview Ave., Ste. 2 INSURER C: Eustis FL 32726 INSURER D: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LT. A TYPE OF INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICY NUMBER 3000NHU6422E POLICY EFFECTIVE 5/01/01 POUCY EXPIRATION 5/01/02 LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE 5 1000000 I7 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE F OCCUR FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) 9 300000 MED EXP )Any one person) S 10000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY S 1000000 71 GENERAL AGGREGATE S 1000000 AGGREGATE OMIT APPLIES PER: J POLICY PRO- n LOC I PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG: S 1000000 A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY )('ANY AUTO X 3OUENHU6446E 5/01/01 5/01102 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT IEa acciden[I S 1000000 ALL OWNED AUTOS i—' s I SCHEDULED AUTOS BODILY INJURY [Per person) 5 X HIRED AUTOS 7X X NON -OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY accident) S IIPer PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) I S GARAGE LIABILITY r —, ANY AUTO i AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT � S OTHER THAN EA ACC � S AUTO ONLY: AGG 5 L�nC OC LIABILITY OCCUR CLAIMS MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE S ' S DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION S A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY 3OWBGP4069 5/01101 5/01/02 S X T C T ITS I 1OTH- E.L. EACH ACCIDENT S 100000 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE S 100000 I E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT S 500000 OTHER • .... ,.+r.�iwa.w�wnmverecuart ccwslo NS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS RE: CONTRACT #97 -2726 - "CHLORINATOR EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ". CERTIFICATE HOLDER INCLUDED ON POLICY AS ADDITIONAL INSURED AS PERTAINING TO GENERAL LIABILITY ARISING FROM OPERATIONS OF THE NAMED INSURED. CERTIFICATE HOLDER ADDITIONAL INSURED: INSURER LETTER: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL GENERAL SERVICES BUILDING NAPLES FL 34112 ACORD 25 -S (7/97) 7-95 CANCELLATION 7 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHO¢;fflMEPQ E ATI1W. A 753980 - 039644 0 ACORD CORPORATION. 1988 16C8 If the certificate holder �s an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing Insurer(s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. IMP -DISC (7100) (F3F) RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 4 0 6 16C 9 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1992 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on September 19, 1994 adopted Resolution No. 94 -668 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1992; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1992 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 94 -668, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 105455 This Resolution adopted thisvl3A4 day of Q 2001, after motion, secondd Inc ,m, arority vote. Attq*t " U Cm irwn' ATT Sfi ^`i ! -4-110n4urt only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI SIONERS DWI HT E. BROCK CORK COLLIER COIJNTX, FLORID James arter, PH. D C airman Approved as to form and le ncy: 2877173 OR: 2914 PG: 1702 ' / RECORDED iD OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL Davi C. igel 10/25/2001 at 02:03PK DWIGHT B. BROCE, CLERK County Attorney Be FEE 6.04 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK ?0 711 BOARD INTEROFFICE 47H FLOOR 11? 7240 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 61737120001 * ** 2877174 OR: 2914 PG: 1703 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02 :03PN MIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO ?NB BOARD INTEROFFICE 4 ?N FLOOR BI? 9240 16C SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Weeks, Sterling E =& Ethel D P O Box 9463 Naples, FL 339419463 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($100.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES FARM SITES N 82.5FT OF S 247.5FT OF W1/2 OF TR 40 UNREC A/D OR 933 PG 193 Folio No. 61737120001 Project No. 61000 Account No. 105455 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this rU4day of 200,1. T :al+t to Cha i raan "s ;dTTE�T t' s°i *tyke only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS �1/1/ E, Bk O T<; CLERK COLLIER C itF Y, FLO �, tea • � Y: JAMES . CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN Approved as to form Piciency ROBERT ZACHARY RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - a n 2 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1993 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 16cio WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on September 20, 1994 adopted Resolution No. 94 -694 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1993; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1993 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 94 -694, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 3405 This Resolution adopted this 34 day of V—,�Z6G- - 2001, after motion, second and majority vote. A►TTST . C � BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LtC I '�. BRO( , CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA � f Al &V to Chairman's .: oe11y. �- BY: Ja es D. Carter, PH. D, Chairman Approved as to form and legal s ' ' ncy:� avid . Weigel County Attorney * ** 2877175 OR: 2914 PG: 1704 * ** RICORDID in OFFICIAL RICORDS of CO1LIIR COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02 :03FN DWIGHT I. BROCI, CLIRI RIC FBB 6.00 COFIIS 1.00 Retn: CLIRI t0 THI BOARD INTIROFFICI 4TH FLOOR BIT 7210 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 61737120001 * ** 2877176 OR: 2914 PG: 1705 * ** RICORDID in OFFICIAL RICORDS of COLLIIR COUNTY, 10/25/2001 at 02:03PK DNIGHT 8. BROCK, CLBRK RIC Fit COPIIS Retn: CLBRK TO THI BOARD INTIROFFICI 4TH FLOORRj IYT 7240 _ O SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Weeks, Sterling E =& Ethel D P O Box 9463 Naples, FL 339419463 The Lien was recorded on the 22nd day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through 1749, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Seventy Five Dollars and Fifty Five Cents ($75.55) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES FARM SITES N 82.5FT OF S 247.5FT OF W1/2 OF TR 40 UNREC A/D OR 933 PG 193 Folio No. 61737120001 Project No. 63001 Account No. 3405 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this day of DCn8 2001. PE$TO; BOARD OF COUNTY COW SSIONERS t�HT L.��13ROCK, CLERK COLLIER Y, FLO By: JAMES CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN Approv+ed'as#o form Attest as to Ch&jr0M•$ S and -,and, legal. �ifficiency ,1►• CA ROBERT CHARY FL 6.00 1.00 16C11 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 4 0 8 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1994 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on August 22, 1995 adopted Resolution No. 95 -475 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1994; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1994 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 95 -475, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 20006 This Resolution adopted this Q154 day of 2001, after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST; This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 61737120001 * ** 2877178 OR: 2914 PG: 1707 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25/2001 at 02:03PK HIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEB 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Reto: CLERK TO THE BUB INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 1 Z BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Weeks, Sterling E =& Ethel D P O Box 9463 Naples, FL 339419463 The Lien was recorded on the 141h day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirty Seven Cents ($104.37), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES FARM SITES N 62.5FT OF S 247.5FT OF W1 /2 OF TR 40 UNREC A/D OR 953 PG 193 Folio No. Project No. Account No 61737120001 64000 20006 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ' —o day of e-T&,G 2001. AVE f:" �', BOARD OF COUNTY COM SIONERS la'WHT'_ Bf K, CLERK COLLIER ggbWry, FLO Y Appi'bvm -is "1 r and le al ency RO E ARY JAMES CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN 16C12 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 4 0 9 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1995 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on August 1, 2000 adopted Resolution No. 2000 -236 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1995; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000 -236, was recorded on August 8, 2000 in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain properties for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1995; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Liens on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance 90 -30, as amended the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1995 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessments for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 2000 -236, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 21225 This Resolution adopted thispJ34day of b0—M 3 CP, 2001, after motion, second and majority vote. DAT1W -_ r' -0.7ca 3'0 I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AT,ST COLLIER COUNTY, FLO A D*'IGtIT g RW— CIf, CLERK ;k •C BY: o At James . Carter PH.D, Chairman 1­1 s1ffitva Chitry s o� ly, Agal s ici cy: n- 2877179 OR: 2914 PG: 1108 RBCORDID in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIBR COUNTY, FL David C. Wpkirel 10/2512001 at 02:03PN DNIGBT B. BROCI, CLBRI i, County Attorney RIC FBB 6.00 COPIBS 1.00 Reta: CURT TO TBB BOARD INT1ROFFIC1 4T8 FLOOR 117 7240 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 61737120001 * ** 2877180 OR: 2914 PG: 1709 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS 10/25/2001 at 02:03FK DWIGHT CLIR CLERE !0 !HB BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN of COLLIER COUNTY, FL E. BROCK, CLERE REC FEE 6.00 COFIBS 1.00 6 C 1 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Weeks, Sterling E =& Ethel D PO Box 9463 Naples, FL 341019463 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES FARM SITES N 82.5FT OF S 247.5FT OF W1 /2 OF TR 40 UNREC A/D OR 933 PG 193 Folio No. 61737120001 Project No. 65000 Account No. 21225 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfactiqn,oftiert,,by action of the Board thisa3'`-day of OWAE-P,,20011. . ATTE'T s,` ,`:wr'l�, ^!!{1r• BOARD OF COUNTY COM SSIONERS DWIC-diT E.= BROCI Ckjlk COLLIER C , FLO JAMES IYAARTER, Ph. D., HAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAPKAIRY * ** 2876823 OR: 2914 P0: 0330 **1 RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 10/25 /2001 at 08:37AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK This instrument prepared by: RBC FEE 6.00 Robert Zachary Retn: COPIES 1.00 Assistant County Attorney CLERK TO THE BOARD Office of the County Attorney INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 6 J = (� 3301 East Tamiami Trail EXT 7240 VVV ,1 Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 36434960007 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Arthur Lee Watson, Sr. and Pauline W. Watson 3 S. Main St. W. Hartford, CT 06107 The Lien was recorded on 9"' day of July 1987, in Official Record Book 001280 page 002015 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Twenty Dollars and No Cents ($120.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 16, BLOCK 234 UNIT 7, GOLDEN GATE Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisC-j_j_ day of ()C.-n J3C -R, 2001. .AT=TEST . JAIGHT 'E.'B OCK, Clerk �.3 fittest - eh:lrian tW �` Approve3 as to form and le al sufficiency ROBE T HARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLO A By: JAMES CARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN * ** 2876824 OR: 2914 PG: 0331 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL This instrument prepared by: 10/25/2001 at 08:37AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK Robert Zachary REC FEE 6.00 Assistant County Attorney Retn: COPIES 1,00 Office of the County Attorney CLERK TO THE BOARD 3301 East Tamiami Trail INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR1 C Naples, Florida 34112 BXT 7240 3 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 58108880006 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Emilio Roland Stillo ET AL 8306 Osceola St Niles, IL 60714 The Lien was recorded on 30th day of December 1996, in Official Record Book 2266 page 0178 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars and No Cents ($245.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 4, BLOCK 406, MARCO BEACH UNIT 13, A SUBDIVISION Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through ijs Chai an, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this cRS" day of E 2001. 'IGHT•E. FROCK, Clerk -Attest i t 'u C41rsan's slttwra �e+�r�y. Approved as to form and legal suf iency 7 ROi3ER'rZ,Ae11ARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLO A By: JAMES gVCARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN * ** 2876825 OR; 2914 PG; 0332 * ** This instrument prepared by: RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL Robert Zachary 10/145/2001 at 08:37AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Assistant County Attorney REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Office of the County Attorney Retn: 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR C 13 (941) 774 -8400 EXT 7240 Property Folio No. 36116200001 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Ivan Magana 229 Nansemond Arch Norfolk, VA 23503 The Lien was recorded on 11th day of December 1998, in Official Record Book 2490 page 2388 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Three Hundred Ninety Dollars and No Cents ($390.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 10, BLOCK 125, UNIT 4, GOLDEN GATE Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this Z day of '+Qa,� tom, 2001. ATTF3`r'.a DWG E: B (CK, Clerk strut �,,��' Ciii fnyn • s Approved's -to "%rm and legal ency �, t R013ERT Z NARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORI A By: JAMES VAARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN * ** 2876826 OR: 2914 PG: 0333 **1 This instrument prepared by: RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL Robert Zachary 10/25/2001 at 08:37AR DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK Assistant County Attorney REC FEE 6.00 Office of the County Attorney Retn: COPIES 1.00 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLojR C1 3 (941) 774 -8400 EXT 7240 Property Folio No. 25630800008 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Beulah Mae Coleman % Berthella Wilson 2172 nd St Immokalee, FL 33934 The Lien was recorded on 5h day of May 1997, in Official Record Book 2310 page 1125 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Two Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($1,200.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT THIRTEEN (13) IN BLOCK EIGHT (8) OF THE CARSON ADDITION IN IMMOKALEE, FLORIDA Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisa3~ day of& ,6&/Z, 2001. I �i `id14T E- '8R.00K, Clerk 'A `i 'f ��aL��.t�, 11AA♦ a t �wto.0 a1run'S Approve il's to form and le 'ency ROBERT ZACHARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By. JAMES ARTER, Ph. AIRMAN This instrument prepared by: RECORDED ** 76$27 OR; 2914 PG; 0334 in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL Robert Zachary 10/25/2001 at 09:37AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK Assistant County Attorney REC FEB 6.00 Office of the County Attorney COPIES 1.00 3301 East Tamiami Trail Retn: Naples, Florida 34112 CLERK TO THE BOARD (941) 774 -8400 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 1240 Property Folio No. 24370880004 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Alphonso Campbell 216S.2 nd Street Immokalee, FL 33934 The Lien was recorded on 8`h day of March 1991, in Official Record Book 001598 page 000290 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars and No Cents ($245.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOTS 30, BLOCK A, BONDURANT SUBDIVISION, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through itis Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this � day of�,6FR , 2001. DVVI E. 643, Clerk Approved as to form and iency 0 ROBERT ZACHARY COLLIER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, • FLOJDA JAMES VARTER, Ph. D., CHAIRMAN 16C14 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 23rd day of October, 2001, by and between E. R. Jahna Industries, Inc., hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County ": WITNESSETH: 1. COMMENCEMENT. This Agreement shall commence on the date of the issuance of a Purchase Order The contract shall terminate on October 22, 2002. The County may, at its discretion and with the consent of the Contractor, renew the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in tyis Agreement for four (4) additional one (1) year periods. The County shall give the Contractor written notice of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. The County Manager, or his designee, may, at his discretion, extend the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement for up to one hundred eighty (180) days. The County Manager, or his designee, shall give the Contractor written notice of the Countv's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term then in effect. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall produce beach compatible sand in accordance with the terms and conditions of the specifications of RFP #01 -3272 and the contractor's proposal hereto attached and made an integral part of this agreement. 3. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement the aggregate of the units actually ordered and furnished at the unit prices, together with the cost of any other charges/ fees submitted in the proposal. Any county agency may purchase products and services under this contract, provided sufficient funds are included in their budget(s). 4. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the Contractor at the following Address: Page 1 150"_4 Ronald C. Johnson, Vice President E. R. Jahna Industries, Inc. 202 E. Stuart Avenue Lake Wales, Florida 33853 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing Department - Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Service Agreement must be in writing. 5. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. 6. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County. All non - County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. 7. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty -four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. Page 2 ibces 8. TERMINATION. Should the contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per this Ag -----ement, the County may terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a seven (7) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non - performance. 9. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 10. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non -Owned Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership. C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County 30 days prior to any expiration date. There shall be a 30 day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. Contractor shall insure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. Page 3 16G5r�l' 11. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor/ Vendor, in consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall hold harmless and defend Collier County and its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorneys' fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by any employee of the named Contractor/ Vendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Contractor/ Vendor's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the Contractor/ Vendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first One Hundred dollars ($100.00) of money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. Page 4 lrlv� 12. CCN T RACT ADM?l�IISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the Countv by the Public Utilities Engineering Department. 13. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, Performance and Payment Bonds, RFP #01 -3272. Specifications and Addendum/ Addenda. 14. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. ATTEST. Dwight E. Brock, Clerk of ^) to Chi irp" - _ signature o -ti,yo BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLO IDA By: 49z— James FVCarter, Ph.D., Chairman E. R. Tahna Industries, Inc. Contractor 7� � r �Jv-,J"e P& �& By: J first Witness i�n to DARLENE PEEBLES nameT Witness RIRF DAVIS TType /print witness nameT Approved as to form and legal s c Robert Zachar Assistant County Attorney Page 5 RONALD C. JOHNSON, VICE PRESIDENT Typed signature and title Dated: 10/30/01 CORPORATE SEAT (corporations only) RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production uPBeach Compatible Sand COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION DATE: August 14, 2001 TO: Prospective Proposers FROM: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M. Public Utilities Purchasing Agent 16CIS' °� 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL GENERAL SERVICES BUILDING NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8425 FAX (941) 732-0844 http://co.collier.fl.us SUBJECT: Addendum #2- RFP #01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Addendum #2 covers the following changes for the above referenced RFP: - Replace the wording on page 12 in the sixth paragraph as follows: DELETE "A twenty (20) milligram sample of native beach sand" and ADD "A forty (40) milliliter dry sample of native beach sand ". If you have any immediate questions regarding the intended Scope of Services, you may contact Harry Huber, Public Utilities Engineering Department, at 941/530 -5341. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 941/732-2667 or e -mail LynWood ri:colliergov.net. cc: Harry Huber, PUED Ron Hovell, PUED RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand 160 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT _ 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION GENERAL SERVICES BUILDING NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8425 FAX (941) 732-0844 http://co.collier.fl.us DATE: August 10, 2001 c TO: Prospective Proposers FROM: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M. ✓° Public Utilities Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: Addendum #1 - RFP #01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Addendum #1 covers the following changes for the above referenced RFP: - Replace the GRADING CRITERIA on page 5 with the attached GRADING CRITERIA page 5A - Replace Exhibit A Section 1 on Page 11 with the attached Section 1 page 11A - Replace page 25 with the attached page 25A - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Permit and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Permit are attached per Exhibit A Section 9.0 - The Revised Reference Range for Beach Grain Size Distribution is attached per Exhibit A Section 2.0 If you have any immediate questions regarding the intended Scope of Services, you may contact Harry Huber, Public Utilities Engineering Department, at 941/530 -5341. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 9411732 -2667 or e-mail LynWood(ikolliergov.net. Cc: Harry Huber, PUED Ron Hovell, PUED RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Page SA, DENDUM #'I All Proposals will be evaluated and scored on the following criteria: 1 6 CI GRADING CRITERIA POINTS 1. Guide for Reporting the Geological Data 45 For the Proposed Sand Source 2. Quality Control, Sampling and Testing Plans 25 3. Past Performance 15 4. Cost proposal 15 Total Possible Points 100 nr -� RFP No. 01 -3272 - Production of Beach Compatible Sand j _ age 1 IA v bENDUM #1 Exhibit A PRODUCTION OF BEACH COMPATIBLE SAND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Scope of Work 1.1 General This Request for Proposal is issued for the purpose of establishing a one (1) year contract with four (4) one (1) year renewal options with the contractor (s) selected to perform the scope of services contained herein. The WORK under this Scope of Services consists of furnishing all labor, equipment, supplies and materials, and performing all operations in connection with producing, screening, washing, stockpiling, testing and loading no less than twenty thousand (15,000) and no more than seventy thousand (70,000) tons of beach compatible sand per contract year for transport and placement on the beaches of Collier County. The WORK must be completed according to the specifications and time frame specified herein, and the State and Federal permits. The CONTRACTOR is solely responsible for all construction means, methods, techniques, and procedures, and the sequence of the WORK. 1.2 Production Schedule The sand production rate is set at an average of one thousand (1,000) tons per day. The WORK shall commence upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed and the average daily production rate shall be such as to enable the WORK to be substantially completed within ninety (90) calendar days. Substantial Completion is defined as having the sand produced, tested and accepted by the OWNER. All WORK shall be finally completed in accordance with the schedule for transport of the material to the beaches. Final Completion is defined as completion of loading the sand for transport. Compatible Sand 5"P!, a 5A RFP No. O 1 -3272 Production of Beach p g ADDENDUM #'1 PRODUCTION OF BEACH COMPATIBLE SAND COST PROPOSAL FOR PIT LOCATED AT Minimum Unit Item Description Unit Quantity* Price Total 1 Production of Beach Tons 15,000 $ $ Compatible Sand 2 Sand Testing Tests TOTAL BID 15 COST PROPOSAL FOR ALTERNATE PIT LOCATED Item Description 1 Production of Beach Compatible Sand 2 Sand Testing TOTAL BID Minimum Unit Quantity* Tons 15,000 $ Tests 15 $ $ Unit Price Total COST PROPOSAL FOR ALTERNATE PIT LOCATED AT Minimum Unit Item Description Unit Quantity* Price 1 Production of Beach Tons 15,000 $ Compatible Sand 2 Sand Testing Tests 15 $ TOTAL BID $ $ Total COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT SUPPORT SkR.VICES bIVISIOI�T DATE: July 24, 2001 TO: Prospective Proposers FROM: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M. Public Utilities Purchasing Agent ibus 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL GENERAL SERVICES BUILDING NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8425 FAX (941) 732-0844 http://co.collier.fl.us SUBJECT: RFP #01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Pursuant to BCC action, the Public Utilities Engineering Department is seeking the services of a qualified firm capable of producing, screening, washing, stockpiling, testing and loading beach compatible sand for transport and placement on the beaches of Collier County. Please refer to the Legal Advertisement contained in the enclosed Proposal Package for the time and the due date for proposal submission. These services will include, but not be limited to the "Scope of Services" as described herein. If you have any immediate questions regarding the intended Scope of Services, you may contact Harry Huber, Public Utilities Engineering Department, at 941/530 -5341. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 941/732 -2667 or e -mail LvnWood,(dvoll ieri�ov. net. We look forward to your participation in this RFP process. cc: Harry Huber, PUED Bid No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand lbcis� Page 2 PUBLIC NCTICE OF REQUES3 FOR PROPOSALS Pursuant to action approved by the BCC, sealed Proposals for Production of Beach Compatible Sand will be received until 3:00 p.m. on August 24, 2001 at the Purchasing Department, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Purchasing Building, Naples, Florida 34112. RFP #01 -3272 "Production of Beach Compatible Sand" A mandatory pre - proposal conference shall be held at the Purchasing Department Conference Room at 2:00 p.m. Local Time on the 7th day of August, 2001, at which time all prospective proposers may have questions answered regarding the Request for Proposal documents for this project. In instances where the County has deemed the pre - proposal conference to be mandatory, the proposer's failure to attend the conference shall result in the rejection of its proposal. All proposals shall be submitted in accordance with the Instructions to Proposers and the Request for Proposal Specifications. Collier County does not discriminate based on age, race, color, sex, religion, national or origin, disability or marital status. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: /S/ STEVE CARNELL Purchasing Director This Public Notice was posted in the lobby of the Purchasing Building, Collier County Government Center on July 24, 2001. i IBid No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand 16CI< . Page 3 SCOPE OF SERVICES See Exhibit A attached. The successful Bidder shall be required to furnish the necessary Payment and Performance Bonds, as prescribed in Exhibits B and C. All Payment and Performance Bonds, Insurance Contracts and Certificates of Insurance shall be either executed by or countersigned by a licensed resident agent of the surety or insurance company having its place of business in the State of Florida. Further, the said surety or insurance company shall be duly licensed and qualified to do business in the State of Florida. Attorneys -in -fact that sign Bid Bonds or Performance and Payment Bonds must file with each bond a certified and effective dated copy of their Power of Attorney. Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion /termination of agreement. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL: In responding to this proposal, each proposer shall submit the following: 1. Guide for Reporting the Geological Data for the Proposed Sand Source. 2. Cost Proposal. 3. List of Subcontractors along with a letter from each proposed subcontractor stating their intention to provide specific services for the Contractor. 4. Bulk samples as specified in the Geological Guide. 5. Statement of Experience and References to include contact name, address, and telephone number. Supplemental Information 1. Statement of litigation that firm or staff is currently involved in, in over the past five (5) years, stating points of contention and 2. Proposer Qualification Form. 3. Insurance Requirements Certification. 4. Proposer's Checklist. 5. Proposer Declaration Statement. or has been involved results if available. Bid No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Page 4 Evaluation Criteria Collier County procedure for selecting is as follows: 1. The County Manager shall appoint a Selection Committee to review all proposals submitted. 2. Request for Proposals 3. Subsequent to the closing of proposals, the Purchasing Agent and Project Manager shall review the proposals received and verify whether each proposal appears to be minimally responsive to the requirements of the published RFP. Should both the Purchasing Agent and Project Manager be appointed to the committee as voting members, such meetings shall be open to the public and the Purchasing Agent shall publicly post prior notice of such meeting in the lobby of the Purchasing Building at least one (1) day in advance of all such meetings. 4. The committee members shall review each Proposal individually and score each proposal based on the evaluation criteria listed below. 5. Prior to the first meeting of the selection committee, the Purchasing Agent will post a notice announcing the date, time and place of the first committee meeting. Said notice shall be posted in the lobby of the Purchasing Building not less than three (3) working days prior to the meeting. The Purchasing Agent shall also post prior notice of all subsequent committee meetings and shall endeavor to post such notices at least one (1) day in advance of all subsequent meetings. 6. The committee will compile individual rankings for each proposal to determine committee recommendations. The committee may at their discretion, schedule presentations from the top- ranked firm(s). The final recommendation will be decided based on review of scores and consensus of committee. 7. Subsequent to award, a contract shall be negotiated with one or more of the- top - ranked firms. Collier County has developed standard contracts that have been approved by County Attorney and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) for all projects. All respondents to this RFP will be required, if selected to perform the work, to execute the standard contract within ten (10) days of Notice of Selection for Award. This document is available for inspection at the Purchasing Office and a review is encouraged prior to submitting a proposal. 8. Upon the successful completion of negotiations, contracts will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. 6 C� Bid No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Page 5 All Proposals will be evaluated and scored on the following criteria GRADING CRITERIA POINTS Grain size distribution: reference range, 3/" coarse 25 Fraction, No. 4 sieve fraction and percent fines (No. 200 sieve fraction) 2. Geologic and mineralogic characteristics: 25 percent quartz/silica, percent calcium carbonates, percent organics and turbidity 3. Sand color 25 4. Cost 25 Total Possible Points 100 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION: Six (6) sets of the proposal must be provided, with the original clearly marked; submitted in a sealed envelope with the RFP Number, Title and Due Date clearly stated on the envelope. All proposals, including qualifications and other data pertinent to making an objective evaluation of your firm's capabilities must be forwarded to the Purchasing Department, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Purchasing Building, Naples, Florida 34112 on or before 3:00 p.m. Collier County Time on August 24, 2001. Any proposals received after the time and date specified will not be considered. The County assumes no responsibility for proposals received after the due date and time, or at any office or location other than that specified herein, whether due to mail delays, courier mistakes, mishandling, inclement weather or any other reason. Late proposals shall be returned unopened, and shall not be considered for award. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: If you have any immediate questions regarding the intended Scope of Services, you may contact Harry Huber, Public Utilities Engineering Department, at 941/530 -5341. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 941/732- 2667 or e -mail ,i_yt tiV_o dc?c��lliergoY.net. Written questions must be received no later than ten (10) Collier County work days prior to Proposal acceptance date. Should any questions or responses require revisions to the Request for Proposal as originally published, such revisions will be by formal amendment only. Bid No. 01 -3272 —Production of Beach Compatible Sand 16C Page 5 INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS PRINCIPALS /COLLUSION: By submission of this Proposal, the undersigned, as proposer, does declare that the only person or persons interested in this proposal as principal or principals is /are named therein and that no person other than therein mentioned has any interest in this Proposal or in the contract to be entered into; that this Proposal is made without connection with any person, company or parties making a Proposal, and that it is in all respects fair and in good faith without collusion or fraud. PROPOSAL WITHDRAWAL: No Proposal can be withdrawn after it is filed unless the Proposer makes their request in writing to the County prior to the time set for the opening of Proposals, or unless the County fails to accept it within sixty (60) days after the date fixed for opening. PROPOSER'S CERTIFICATION: Submission of a signed Proposal is Proposer's certification that the Proposer will accept any awards made to them as a result of said submission of the terms contained therein. EXCEPTIONS TO INSTRUCTIONS OR CONDITIONS: Proposers taking exception to any part or section of these instructions or conditions shall indicate such exceptions on their Proposal. Failure to indicate any exceptions shall be interpreted as the Proposer's intent to fully comply with the specifications as written. LAWS AND REGULATIONS: It shall be understood and agreed that any and all services, materials and equipment shall comply fully with all Local, State and Federal laws and regulations. INSURANCE COSTS: Since these conditions include Insurance Requirements, there may be additional insurance costs to the Proposer's firm. It is, therefore, imperative that the Proposer discuss these requirements with the Proposer's agent, as noted on the Insurance Check List, so that allowances for any additional costs can be made by the Proposer. The Consultant's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price, or the Consultant's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. EXPENSES INCURRED IN PREPARING PROPOSAL: The County accepts no responsibility for any expenses incurred in the Proposal, preparation, or presentation; such expenses to be born exclusively by the Proposer. QUALIFICATION OF PROPOSERS: Before the award of any contract, each Proposer may be required to show (to the complete satisfaction of the county Manager or their designee), that they have the necessary facilities, ability and financial resources to furnish the service as specified herein in a satisfactory manner, and they may also be required to show past history and references which will enable the County Manager, or 'their designee, to satisfy themselves as to the qualifications. Failure to qualify according to the foregoing requirements will justify the County in rejecting a Proposal. AWARD CHALLENGE: All costs accruing from a Proposal or an award challenged as to quality, etc. (test, etc.) shall be assumed by the challenger. LOBBYING: As per County Ordinance #99 -22, all firms are hereby placed on NOTICE that the Board of County Commissioners does not wish to be lobbied..either individually or collectively... about a project for which a firm has submitted a proposal. Firms and their agents are not to contact members of the County Commission for such purposes as meeting or introduction, luncheons, dinners, etc. During the publication, evaluation and award phases, no firm or their agent shall contact any other employee of Collier County in reference to this solicitation and their prospective or actual Proposal, with the exception of the Purchasing Department except where otherwise expressly permitted by County ordinance, resolution, or by the RFP document. Failure to abide by this provision may serve as grounds for disqualification for this or a future award to the firm. PROPOSAL FORM: Each Proposer must submit the proposal Form included in this Request for Proposal. SINGLE PROPOSAL: Only one Proposal from a legal entity will be considered. If it is found that a Proposer is interested in more than one Proposal, all Proposals in which such a Proposer is interested will be rejected. SIGNATURE OF PROPOSER: The Proposer must sign the Proposal in the spaces provided for signatures. If the Proposer is an individual, the words "Sole Owner" shall appear after their signature. If the Proposer is a partnership, the word "Partner" shall appear after the signature of one of the partners. If the Proposer is a corporation, the signature required is the Officer, Officers or Individual duly authorized by its by -laws or the Board of Directors to bind the corporation with official corporate seal affixed thereto. INTERPRETATION OF PROPOSAL DOCUMENTS AND INVESTIGATION OF PROJECT: Each Proposer RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand shall thoroughly examine the Proposal Documents, and judge for themselves all matters relating to the location and the character of the services they agree to perform. If the Proposer should be of the opinion that the meaning of any part of the proposal Document is doubtful, obscure or contains errors or omissions, they should report such opinion or opinions to the Purchasing Director. Neither the County manager nor their staff shall be responsible for oral interpretation given either by themselves or members of their staff. The issuance of a written addendum shall be the only official method whereby such interpretation will be given. REJECTION OR ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSALS: The right is reserved by Collier County to waive any irregularities in the Proposa!, to reject any or all Proposals, to re- solicit for Proposals, if desired, and upon recommendation and justification by Collier County to accept the Proposal which in the judgment of the County is deemed the most advantageous for the public and the County of Collier. Any Proposal which is incomplete, conditional, obscure or which contains irregularities of any kind, may be cause for rejection of the Proposal. In the event of default of the successful Proposer, or their refusal to enter into the Collier County contract, the County reserves the right to accept the Proposal of any other Proposer or to re- advertise using the same or revised documentation, at its sole discretion. PROTECTION RIGHTS OF COUNTY: The County reserves the right to include in any contract document such terms and conditions as it deems necessary for the proper protection of the rights of Collier County. PROTEST PROCEDURES: Any actual or prospective respondent to an Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal who is aggrieved with respect to the former, shall file a written protest with the Purchasing Director prior to the opening of the Bid or the due date for acceptance of Proposals. All such protests must be filed with the Purchasing Director no later than 11:00 AM Collier County time on the advertised date for the opening of the Bid or the acceptance date for the Request for Proposals. Award of contract will be made by the Board of County Commissioners in public session. Award recommendations will be posted outside the offices of the Purchasing Department on Wednesdays and Thursdays. Any actual or prospective respondent who desires to formally protest the recommended contract award must file a notice of intent to protest with the Purchasing Director within two (2) calendar days (excluding weekends and County holidays) of the date that the recommended award is posted. Upon filing of Page 700 said notice, the protesting party will have five (5) days to file a formal protest and will be given instructions as to the form and content requirements of the formal protest. A copy of the "Protest Policy" is available at the office of the Purchasing Director. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME: A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submit bids on leases or real property to a public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, or subcontractor under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for Category Two for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION: Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion /termination of agreement. ®ST Pi��3Pl�SAL R ALTERNAT P T LO ATED A NOT PROPOSID Minimum Unit tern ®escri icon Unit Quantity` Price Total 1 Production of Beach Torts 15.000 �.^�..- Compatible Sand 2 Sand Testing Tests 15�_____�.—- �--- -- $ NOT PROPOSED TOTAL A. BID COST Pi~F�P 7r AL R ALT KATE: P i3CAT AT No P Minimum Unit Unit G2uantity" Price Total Item Description �-�-- 1 Production of Beach Trans 15,000 $ -- Compatible Sand 2 nand Testing Tests 15 $-- ---- -- $ TOTAL BiC7 � NOT PROPOSED 16 I :, Page 13a p eta. pl- 3Z',2— ASOducroD ai BetC3f CoIDp3tible 5slte ADDENDUM BEACH CoMp + g g SA PIT L 9A' IDE .AST ORTM.+��lY�L+ Minimum Unit item Descry Lion Unit Ouantity * ate total 1 Production of Beach Tans 15,000 $_ 4..34 fs5,100.OQ $ Campatitaie Sand 280.00 4,200.00 2 Sand Testing Tests 15 $' 69,300.00 SID TOTAL BID ®ST Pi��3Pl�SAL R ALTERNAT P T LO ATED A NOT PROPOSID Minimum Unit tern ®escri icon Unit Quantity` Price Total 1 Production of Beach Torts 15.000 �.^�..- Compatible Sand 2 Sand Testing Tests 15�_____�.—- �--- -- $ NOT PROPOSED TOTAL A. BID COST Pi~F�P 7r AL R ALT KATE: P i3CAT AT No P Minimum Unit Unit G2uantity" Price Total Item Description �-�-- 1 Production of Beach Trans 15,000 $ -- Compatible Sand 2 nand Testing Tests 15 $-- ---- -- $ TOTAL BiC7 � NOT PROPOSED 16C[!r. RFP #01 -3272 "Production of Beach Compatible Sand" E. R. Jahna industries, Inc. - Ortona Sand Mine NOTES ON COST PROPOSAL Item #1 The unit price for beach compatible sand is based on a price of $4.34 per ton. Collier County will be invoiced based on tonnage (FDOT- certified scales). The sand supplied by E. R. Jahna Industries, Inc. meets all specifications for beach compatible sand outlined in RFP No. 01 -3272 (and addenda) except for some variation in the gradation in the medium grain size range. A graph of Ortona Sand grain size distribution relative to the reference ranges of beach sand is included in the Geologic Report Attachment B. Based on laboratory testing results from previous Collier County Project #00 -3176, the carbonate content of the sand may range from 0.0 to 0.6% by weight averaging approximately 0.25 %. The organic content may range from 0.0 to 0.4% averaging approximately 0.1% by weight. The Ortona sand will be free of coarse gravel, rocks, and pebbles. Item #2 The unit price for sand testing will be $280.00 and includes sieve analysis with reports on specified grain -size distribution sheets, organic content, total CaCO3 content, and labor and travel time for sampling and delivery of sand samples to subcontractor's certified laboratory. Sampling will be performed by qualified laboratory technician under the direct supervision of licensed professional (P.G. or P.E.). One representative sample will be collected from the stockpile and tested for each 1000 tons of material produced. Lab testing reports will be prepared and submitted to Collier County in a timely manner consistent with conditions of the RFP. Payment Terms Payment: Net 30 days from the date of invoice. 3� a FORI 6 C 1 LiS T MAJOR WORK PRESENTLY UNDER CON T RAFT: % corn lffied Proiect Contract Amount. E. R. JAHNA INDUSTRIES, INC. WAS FORMED IN 1950 AND HAS � NOT APPLICABLE MINED COMMERICAL -GRADE QUARTZ SAND AT THE ORTONA SAND MINE $ FOR 40 YEARS LIST CURRENT PROJECTS ON WHICH YOUR FIRM IS THE CANDIDATE POOR AWARD: E. R. JAHNA INDUSTRIES, INC. SUPPLIES MATERIALS FOR THOUSANDS OF COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND MUNICIPAL CUSTOMERS THROUGHOUT FLORIDA Have you, at any time, failed to complete a project? ❑°des R] No (if the answer is yes, submit details on separate sheet. REFERENCES: Bank(s) Maintaining Account(s): SUNTRUST BANK, MID- FLORIDA NA (LAKE WALES, FL) FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA (LAKE WALES, FL) Pursuant to information for prospective bidders /proposers for the above - mentioned proposed project, the undersigned is submitting the information as required with the understanding that it is only to assist in determining the qualifications of the organization to perform the type and magnitude of work intended, and further, guarantee the truth and accuracy of all statements herein made. We will accept your determination of qualifications without prejudice. r u TAANA TNn1TSTRIES . INC. Title: Attested By: RONALD C. JOHNSON R. CARL MCCOLLUM -7- SECRETARY Date: AUGUST 23, 2001 t €tie: x1:111:11® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCEL D1,/01 /01 m) PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MAn JF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE USI Fkxida - Lakeland HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR P. 0. Drawer 1398 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 402 S. Kentucky Ave., 4th Fl. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Lakeland FL 33802-1398 COMPANY A Maryland Casuaky/Zurkh INSURED COMPANY E R Jahna Industries Inc ETAL B CNA Insurance Co COMPANY P 0 Drawer 840 Lake Wales FL 33859 C RU Insurance Company COMPANY D COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY DATE EFFECTIVE (MM /DDIYY) POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MM /DDI !) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY CON98662126 04/01/01 04101/02 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP /OP AGG $ 2,000,000 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 CLAIMS MADE FX OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ 300,000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 10,000 A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY CON98662167 04/01/01 04/01/02 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS X BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ HIRED AUTOS NON OWNED AUTOS X PROPERTY DAMAGE $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: ANY AUTO EACH ACCIDENT $ AGGREGATE $ C EXCESS LIABILITY OUL0025172 04/01/01 04/01102 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 10,000,000 AGGREGATE $ 10,000,000 X UMBRELLA FORM $ OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS COMPENSATION AND B EL EACH ACCIDENT $ 500,000 EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY WC249340238 04/01/01 04/01/02 B THE PROPRIETOR INCL PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE: EXCL EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 500,000 EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 500,000 OTHER A Contractors Equipment CON98662084 04/01/01 04/01/02 Scheduled All Risk Ded $2,500 RESCRIP7ION OF OPERATIONSI�OCATIONSNEHICLES/Spp �IAI_ ITEMS , Certificate holder Is listed as ad�ltlonal Insured, ATIMA Contract No: 01- 3272 - Production of beach compatible sand CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE Collier County Board of County Commissioners EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 3301 E Tam amI Trail 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTIC ATION OR LIABILITY Naples FL 34112 OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPAN , S AGENTS OR REPRESEN S. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 41 ACORD 25.5 (1195) 0 ACORD CORPORATION 1988 -- ptig fly 01 09 :04p Carl Moco11UM es3= s796981 p.2 RF,n No- 01 -32 ^y — Fro&cticn of Beach Cot mzmblc Saud i Collier County Ficriaa insurance Requirements RFP #100-31 76 .L V INSURANCE ANCE TYPE REQUIRED LIMITS X 1. Workers' Compensaticr X 2. Commercial General Li: Nifty (Occurrence Form) patterned after the 100" I.S.O. _. form with no Iimiting en6orsements. Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements. S®dilyy iniury & property Damage $1 cM.,000 Single Limit , Per Occurrence X 3. Indemnification: Th.; Contractor/Vendor, in consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.o0), the receipt ,ind sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall hold h;i unless and defend Collier County and its agents and employees from all suits and action 3, including attorney's fees and all costs of iitigaticri and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thei aunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by a i esnnpluyee of the named ContractorlVendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly of indirr, ctly employed by any of them. The ContractorlVendoes obligation under this provision sN ill not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the ContractorNendoe5 limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first 0 -ie Hundred Dollars ($100.00) or money received on the contract price is considered as p, iyrnent of this obiigation by the County- 4. Automobile Liability $500.010 Each Occurrence Ovmed /Non - owned /Hir6 9d - Automobile Included 5. Other Insurance as indi rued belovr a) Professional Liability $ Per Occurrence The Consultant shall ba: soleiy responsible to parties with whom it shall deal in carrying out the terms of this agrer- meat and shall hold the Courrty harmless against all claims arising from the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of consultant by third parties- — Rug !15 01 08 - -04F Carl McCollum 2E3- 5786381 P.3 FX- o. 1 -_ 2 2 — Productiau of Beach Cox 39aab1c Sand Page 10 16C 1 . Collier caunbj Ronde Insurance Requirc=mGnts (Caontinued) S- Contractor shall ins ate that all subcontractors cornply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same contractor shall provide the County wfth certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. X 7, Collier County must be named as "ADOMONAL INSURED" an the Insurance Certificate for Commercial Genera Liability. 8. Collier County Board of County commissioners shall be named as the Certificate Holder. NCTE: The "Certificate Holder" should read as follows: Collier County Board of County Cornrnissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 X 9. Thirty (3a0) Days Canci:illation Notice is r&s�a�ired. X 1C. The Certificate must st;ite the RFP Number and Tide. BIDDER'S AND INSURANCE AC ENT STATEMENT: We understand the insurance re,;uiremenls canUined In these specificatiOns. and that the evidence of said insurance may be require, i Wthin five (5) business days of the ward of bid, USI Florida Insuranc _ Signature of Proposer's Agent RIT No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Camnatible Sand Page 2 LIST 6Cr- lS T Cv SUBCONTr�ACTCl�S The undersigned states that the following is a full and complete list of the proposed subccntracto on-this Project and the class of work. to be performed by each, and that such list will not be added 10 nor altered without written consent of the Project Manager. The undersigned further acknowledges its responsibility for ensuring that the subcontractors listed herein meet all legai requirements applicabie to and necessitated by this Agreement, incluiding, but not limited to proper licenses, certifications, registrations and insurance coverage. T he County reserves the right to disqualify any bidder who includes ncn- compliant subcontractors in his bid offer. Further, the Count] may direct the bidder /contractor to removelrepiace any subcontractor that is found to, be non- compiiant with this requirement subsequent to award of the contract at no additional cost to the County. THIS LIST MUST BE COMPLETED OR SID WILL BE DEEMED NON - RES PONS I`V'E. (Attach additional sheets as needed). Subcontractor and Address 1. ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES. I19C 9970 BAVARIA ROAD 2. FT. MYERS, FL 33913 3. 4. 5. 6. Dated 8/23/01 E. R. JAHNA INDUSTRIES, INC. Matj 25 01 02:45P HLHM B Ml —LtK 01V -- rcc- -ruz3-r H. L Rug,21 01 09:19a Ardaman & Assoc. Ft Myers (9411 768 -0409 p.1 Ardaman & Associates, inc. 16C!5� August 2s, 2001 fulata chnK;al. Ern �rn^maniai and Ardaman Proposal Flo. 01-084 hlatnnai:. Consuitnnis TO: E.R. JAiHNA INDUSTRIES, INC. 5720 SANDPIPER PLACE FoRT fi�IEYERS, F(.ORIDA 33919 Attention: Mr. Alan Miller SUBJECT: Beach Compatible Sand Testing Collier County Slid No. 01-3272 Dear Mr. Miller: Ardaman and Associates, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to be a member of your teats by providing quality ass,uranceim3terials testing services on the sand material to be used on this project. Please call us if you have any questions. Very truly yours, 7 & ASSOCIATES, INC. Gary A. Drew, P.E. Branch Manager GADlegs Poswr Fax Note 7671 D'iro " -p7 j a °9esi Ta �� 6 /1.cz it9kagm Few lm A JA 04 �!A B I. 4N4 Phone a %lfC 0 Fax a ea ,GtS • C 4 99:0 Baysrirn eum , nr! Vvr•;, Fimida 332 ?3 'hone i9411 750 -65100 FAX (9411 736 -N99 :.'•11irr,: n: Bdrlow, C ov.)a Fcrtl L.ucsrC-k:. `nrj i iycas, r•.tami. Orlando. ?nn CharWc Pan Si Lucie. Sarasota, TiIlahacaec. Tampcs. W. Poir,. 9eurri - 0 1-'1'77 RFP No. -Production of Beach Compatible Sand Page 2716 C I'Sr S I ATEMENT QF EXPEFIENCE OF BIDDER BEACH COMPATIBLE SAND — COLLIER COUNTY HARRY HUBER — COLLIER.CO. 941-530-5341 he Bidder is required to state below what work of similar magnitude is a judge of its experience, skiii and business standing and of its abilitj to conduct the work as compietImly and as rapidly as reqUrad under the terms of the contract. Proiect and Location . Reference 1. BEACH COMPATIBLE SAND — COLLIER COUNTY HARRY HUBER — COLLIER.CO. 941-530-5341 2. SMATHERS BEACH, KEY WEST, FLORIDA ARTEK. INC. — DONNY HUGHES 561-924-2049 3. SARASOTA LAND FILL HUBBARD CONSTRUCTION — DAVE DEMPSEY — 407-645-5500 A KREHLING INDUSTRIES—MULTIPLE CONCRETE KREHLING INDUSTRIES BILL RYAN — 941-597-3162 5. SOUTHDOWN—MULTIPLE CONCRETE PLANT SOUTHDOWN, TAMPA, FL BILL GENTRY — 800-282-9133 6. 7. A 16 C I R_FF No. 0 i -3272 - Pmduc' ion of Beach Compatible Sand Page 28 THIS SHEET MIdS T BE SIGNED BY VENDOR Board of county Dommissicnem Collier County, Fiodda Purchasing Department PROPOSERS CHECK LIST I M P O R T A N T: Please read carsyfu ly, sign in the spaces indicated and return with your bid proposal. Proposer should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed: 1. The RFP has been signed. 2. The RFP prices offered have beer, reviewed. 3. The price extensions and totals have been checked. 4. The payment terms have been indicated. _5. Any required drawings, descriptive literature, etc. have been included. 6. Any delivery information required is included. 7. If required, the amount of bid bond has been checked, and the bid bond or cashiers check has been included. s. Any addenda have been signed and included. 9. The mailing envelope has been addressed to: Purchasing Director Collier County Government Center Purchasing Building 3301 Fast Tarniarni Trail Maples, Florida 34112 10. The mailing envelope must be sealed and marked with: ® RFP Number; ® RFP Title; ® Opening Date 11. The RFP will be mailed or delivered in time to be received no later than the specified opening date and time. (Otherwise RFP cannot be considered.) ALL COURIER DELIVERED BIDSIRFPS MUST HAVE THE BIDIRFP NUMBER AND TITLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE COULTER PACKET. E. R. 3AHNA INDUSTRIES, INC. �- j e sitt. na 8/23/01--**) Date P,PP Yic. 01 -3272 - Production of Beach Compatible Sand Deciaration Statement 16C r Page 29 FROM: E. R. JAHNA INDUSTRIES, INC. ORTONA SAND NINE. ORTONA, PL D; TL DUE: As` gudi: 24, 20014 3000 P10 Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government Center Napies, Florida 34112 RE: RFP RIO. 01-3272 - " Production of Beach Compatible Sand" Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Proposer hereby declares that he has examined the Scope of Services, and informed himself fully in regard to all conditions pertaining to the worix to be done. The Proposer further declares that the only persons, company or parties interested in this Proposal or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that the Proposal is made without connection with any other person, company or companies making a Proposal; and it is in all respects fail and in aocd faith, without collusion or fraud. The services to be furnished by us shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the Request for Proposal #01 -3272 as issued by Coiner County on July 24, 2001. The undersigned do agree that should this Proposal be accepted, to execute the form of contract and present the same to the County Purchasing Director for approval within fifteen (15) days after being notified of the awarding of this contract. The undersigned do further agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of contract within fifteen (15) days will result in damages to the County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this 23RD day AUGUST 2001 in the County of POLL , in the State of ]FLORIDA E. R. JAHNA INDUSTRIES. INC. Firm's Complete Legal Name Check one of the following: ❑ Sole Proprietorship ® Corporation or P.A. ❑ Limited Partnership ❑ General Partnership Phone No 863- 676 -9431 FAX No. 863- 676 -2677 202 E. STUART AVE. Address LAKE WALES. EL 33853 RONALD C. JOIRKSON VICE PRESIDETN E. R. JAHNA INDUSTRIES, INC. �.0. Box 840 e Lake Wales, Florida 33850 -0840 • (863) 676 -943 i STATEMENT OF LITIGATION Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government Center Naples, Florida 34112 16C 1< it From: E. R. Jahna Industries, Inc. Ortona Sand Mine RE: RFP No. 01 -3272 "Production of Beach Compatible Sand„ Date Due: August 24, 2001 @ 3:00 p.m. Dear Commissioners: E. R. Jahna Industries, Inc. /Ortona Sand is not currently involved in any litigation, nor has it been in litigation in the last 5 years. RCJ: dfp Sincerely, 7Rona . J o Vice- President MINES: Cabbage Grove • Clermont - East ^ Ctermon*. - Independent ° Haines City ^ Mills ° Oriona Ma8 24 01 05 :35pa Aug -14 -01 10:52 ALAN B MILLER From-Collier County Purchasin` 941 -489 -4084 p.1 941 722 0844 T -122 P 002/005 F -Z45 RFP No. 01 -3272 - Pmduclion of Bawl Compeuble Sand ;%e cmuu couNTY GOVERNMENT 16CI< '. 3301 EAST TAM ANTI TRAIL. GENERAL. SERVICES BUILDING NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8425 FAX (941) 732 -0844 httP-'//co.coUicrJ1.nz DATE: August 10, 2001 � TO: Prospective Proposers FROM* Lyn M_ Wood, C.P.M. Public Utilities Purchasing Agent SUBJECT: Addendum 41 - RFP #01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Addendum #1 covers the following changes for the above referenced RFC': - Replace the GRADING CRITERIA on page 5 with the attached GRADING CRITERIA page SA - Replace Exhibit A Section 1 on Page 11 with the attached Section 1 page 11A - Replace page 25 with the attached page 25A - U.S_ Army Corps of Engineers (ACCE) Permit and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) Permit are attached per Exhibit A Section 9.0 - The Revisers Reference Range for Beach Grain Size Distribution is attached per Exhibit A Section 2.0 If you have any immediate questions regarding the intended Scope of Services, you may contact Marry Huber, Public Utilities Engineering Department, at 9411530 -5341. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 9411732 -2857 or e-mail T ynWoodrakollie�Ltov.nel. Cc: Harry Fauber, PUEO Rots Hovell, PLIED E. R. JAHKA INDUSTRIES, INC. ANY SIGNATURE ALE AUGUST 23, 2001 DATE 24 01 CE: 3-5;-,p f;LPN B MI7,-LER kjg- le-53 �rnm-coh ter Canty Pulcracifla ,qr.p X10, 1 --J-272 — Product-- of Beach COmmdblld and 1941 -438-4015-4 341 7"12 D844 T-122 !--rcrOSGIS will tbe avaivated ard �corzd oq the folkwing Cllzr',M: 2i-c -A, .6 CI Guide af;:.r F,,-CQrj'rr, e 'GPC(0C'CZ-3f Z For line PrCP.Osed Sard Sourcz 2. Qualitj Control, %5"amPling and Testing x'Izns 3. Past PerformarlCe 4. Cost PMPOSal Total Possible Points 25 J5 Is 100 Mai 24 01 Ob : J6p HL` N B M " LLtK ZJ41 -- 4dZJ -4U.Id4 P. -d Aug-14 -01 1D:53 From - Collier County Purchacins 341 732 D044 T -122 P 004 1005 F -245 I RFP No. of -3272 — PTOduction OfBeacli Compatible Sand ADDENDUM Page ge t I IA #c1 Exhibit A 3EAC4 CONIPATIBL !. SAND 16cl< SCOPE Ole= SERVICES Scope of Work 1.1 General This Request for Proposal is issued for the purpose of establishing a one (1) year contract with four (4) one (1) year renewal options +mitt? the contractor (s) selected to perform the scope of services contained herein. The WORK under this Scope of Services consists of fumishing all labor, equipment, supplies and materials, and performing aft operations in connection with producing, screening, washing, stockpiling, testing and loading no less than twenty thousand (15,000) and no more than seventy thousand (70,000) tons of beach compatible sand per contract year for transport and placement on the beaches of Collier County. The WORK must be completed according to the specifications and time frame specified herein, and the State and Federal permits. The CONTRACTOR is solely responsible for all construction means, methods, techniques, and procedures, and the sequence of the WORK. 1.2 Production Schedule The sand production rate is set at an average of one thousand (1,000) tans per day. The WORK shall commence upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed and the average daily production rate shall be such as to enable the WORK to be substantially completed within ninety (90) calendar days. Substantial Completion is defined as having the sand produced, tested and accepted by the OWNER. All WORD shall be finally completed in accordance with the schedule for transport of the material to the beaches. Final Completion is defined as completion of loading the sand for transport. Na: _- 24, 31 0 F_ . 3 Sp Aug- I A-01 10-41 19 L F N 3 N ; iL_ L E R i'f ufr.-Coi I; or CzLmv ?ur:hzs i r.5 S41 - ADS -4004 141 T^Z 034A 7a11O �.DOZMZ F_-'42 16C1�1 %- COLIJER, COU_NTY GOVERNMENT `{_j_RCaA_KNG =1 ZA2T TAIMLAA9 ISU7�;5RT C-ZjNZR_Aj SZR�i�CXS 3UrT�B11yG ALIPL2 WS, FLOM DA 34112 (941) 774-8425 F.CK (94.1) 732-0844 hztpV1co.co1L9r.fb2z DATE.- August 14, 2001 TO: ProspectNe Proposers FROM: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M. J Public Utilities Purchasing Agent 1UEJEC'T. Addend urr. #2 - IRFP #0 1 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Addendum #2 covers the following changes for t1he above referenced RFR - Replace the wording on page 12 in the sixth paragraph as follows: DEI ETE "A twenty (20) milligram sample of natfive beach Sand" and ADD "A. forty 140) milliliter dry sample of native beach sand". If you have any immediate questions regarding the intended Scope of Services, you may contact Harry Huber, Public Utilities Engineering Department. at 9411530-5341. Procedural queries may be directed to me at 941/732-266-7 or e-mail Lygy r _Qo�(tepc ��v et. f1c, Harry Huber, PUED Ron Hovell, PLED E.-R. JABRA IINDUSTRIES, INC. ANY SI AND TITLE AUGUST 23, 2001 DATE RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Page 11 6 C o Exitibit A V PRODUCTION OF BEACH COMPATIBLE SAND SCOPE OF SERVICES 1.0 Scope of Work 1.1 General This Request for Proposal is issued for the purpose of establishing a one (1) year contract with two (2) one (1) year renewal options with the contractor (s) selected to perform the scope of services contained herein. The WORK under this Scope of Services consists of furnishing all labor, equipment, supplies and materials, and performing all operations in connection with producing, screening, washing, stockpiling, testing and loading approximately sixty -eight thousand (68,000) tons of beach compatible sand for transport and placement on the beaches of Collier County. The WORK must be completed according to the specifications and time frame specified herein, and the State and Federal permits. The CONTRACTOR is solely responsible for all construction means, methods, techniques, and procedures, and the sequence of the WORK. 1.2 Production Schedule The production rate for the sixty -seven thousand five hundred (67,500) tons is set at an average of one thousand (1,000) tons per day. The WORK shall commence upon receipt of a Notice to Proceed and the average daily production rate shall be such as to enable the WORK to be substantially completed within ninety (90) calendar days. Substantial Completion is defined as having the sand produced, tested and accepted by the OWNER. All WORK shall be finally completed in accordance with the schedule for transport of the material to the beaches. Final Completion is defined as completion of loading the sand for transport. 2.0 Beach Compatible Sand Specifications The quality of the sand and its compatibility with the native beach is a project priority and shall be considered as the primary factor in the awarding of the bid. The beach compatible sand shall meet the criteria contained in Florida Administrative Code 6213-41, Florida Statutes 327.40, 370.0.12(1) and 370.021, the State and Federal permits, and the following specifications: • All beach compatible sand shall be sand that is similar to that already existing on the native beach in grain size. In general, the native beach consists of naturally occurring fine grain quartz sand with a mean grain size diameter of 0.18 to 0.20 mm. Attached hereto is the Reference Range for Beach Grain Size Distribution depicting the range of native beach grain size distribution curves. This Range shall serve as one guideline for determining compatibility of the sand with the native beach. • All beach compatible sand shall be sand that is similar to that already existing on the native beach in coloration. In general, the native beach consists of white to very light gray sand. The Munsell Soil Color Chart shall serve as one guideline for determining compatibility of the sand with the native beach. The reference classifications on the Chart are white 5YR 8/1, 7.5YR 8/0, 10YR 8/1, 2.5Y 8/0, and 5Y 8/1. All beach compatible sand shall be visibly free of construction debris, clay, organics, peat, or other foreign matter. 16CIf"l RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Page 12 All beach compatible sand shall be free of coarse gravel, rocks and cobbles. That is, all beach compatible sand shall not contain gravel, rocks or cobbles, exclusive of shell material, retained by the 3/4" sieve. ® All beach compatible sand shall not contain greater than 1% fine gravel, exclusive of shell material, of the material retained by the #4 sieve. a All beach compatible sand shall not contain greater than 5% fines passing the #200 sieve. a All beach compatible sand shall not be manufactured carbonate. In general, the native beach consists of naturally occurring fine grain quartz sand with some shell and calcium carbonate particles. The percent calcium carbonate ranges from 2% to 8% for the native beaches. This range shall serve as one guideline for determining compatibility of the sand with the native beach. ® All beach compatible sand shall be suitable for complying with state water quality standards. Turbidity tests were conducted by the OWNER's representatives to quantify the degree of turbidity generated by the native beach. A capped four (4) liter graduated container was filled with three (3) liters of distilled water. A twenty (20) milligram sample of native beach sand was added to the container and agitated for 60 seconds. Turbidity values ranged from 0 to 10 Nephelometric Turbidity Units (NTU). This range shall serve as one guideline for determining compatibility of the sand with the native beach. All beach compatible sand shall be processed through a wash plant and screeners as necessary to meet these specifications. The beach compatible sand shall be provided by the CONTRACTOR in accordance with U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit conditions and these specifications. The OWNER shall enter into an separate contract with a separate party (Trucker) for the transportation and placement of the beach compatible sand provided by the CONTRACTOR. The beach compatible sand must be produced, tested, and accepted by the OWNER before any trucking occurs. 3.0 Beach Compatible Sand Stockpile 3.1 General It is anticipated the CONTRACTOR shall stockpile the beach compatible sand for transport to the OWNER's designated beach fill sites. The CONTRACTOR shall warrant that the OWNER, DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, and Trucker shall at all times have reasonable ingress and egress to the stockpile. The CONTRACTOR shall provide a document granting Right of Entry to the OWNER and his representatives. The CONTRACTOR shall provide access to the sand production Plant and stockpile as necessary to the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL for the purpose of observing and monitoring WORK being performed and to the Trucker for transporting the beach compatible sand to the beach fill sites. The CONTRACTOR shall work cooperatively with the OWNER in coordinating his schedule with the OWNER and the Trucker. The CONTRACTOR is responsible for loading the beach compatible sand on the Trucker's trucks. RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand 3.2 Security and Stabilization Page 13 16C A The area for stockpiling shall be of adequate size to accommodate the quantity to be stockpiled. The CONTRACTOR shall provide a twenty (20) foot buffer around the perimeter of the stockpile area and shall provide and install appropriate signs and fencing to designate and restrict usage of this area. The CONTRACTOR shall stabilize the stockpile to prevent run -off and wind blown losses of material. 4.0 Beach Compatible Sand Testing At the CONTRACTOR's expense, during production of the sand the following sampling shall be performed by a Licensed Professional Geologist or Engineer and tested by a State certified laboratory and certified by same, and provided by the CONTRACTOR to the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL to ensure the stockpiled material complies with the specifications and permits. a) One (1) test shall be performed for each one thousand (1,000) tons of material produced. The samples shall be representative of the material produced. b) Sediment sample results shall be provided in the form of "Reports of Sieve Analysis and Grain Size Distribution Curves" from a state certified laboratory. Sieve sizes to be reported include 2" 1" %" 1/2" s /a" No 4, No. 8, No. 10, No. 16, No. 20, No. 40, No. 60, No. 80, No. 100, No. 140, and No. 200. Results shall be presented in comparison to the Reference Range for Beach Grain Size Distribution. C) Samples shall be tested for percent organics and percent calcium carbonate. d) The CONTRACTOR shall provide all sample and test results to the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL within seven (7) business days of the date of the sampling. 5.0 Approval of WORK By approving any payment, the OWNER or his designated representative shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that he made exhaustive or continuous on -site inspection to check the quality or the quantity of the WORK, or that he has reviewed the means, methods and techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction, or that he has made any examination to ascertain how or for what purpose the CONTRACTOR has used the money paid or to be paid to him. The OWNER may have a project representative on site to observe operation of the CONTRACTOR. The presence of the OWNER or his designated representative shall not relieve the CONTRACTOR of responsibility for the proper execution of the WORK in accordance with the specifications or permits applicable to the WORK. 6.0 CONTRACTOR's Plant and Equipment The CONTRACTOR agrees to keep on the job sufficient Plant and Equipment to meet the requirements of the WORK. The Plant and Equipment shall be in satisfactory operating condition and capable of safely and efficiently performing the WORK as set forth in the specifications and the Plant shall be subject to access by the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL at all times. The CONTRACTOR is required to demonstrate that he has the capacity to produce a minimum of one thousand (1,000) tons per day. No reduction in the capacity of the Plant employed on the WORK shall be made except by written permission of the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. The measure of 16CI!r4i RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand Page 14 the "Capacity of the Plant" shall be its actual performance on the WORK to which these specifications apply. The CONTRACTOR shall conduct his operations sc as to comply with all Federal, State, and local laws pertaining to noise. 7.0 Basis and Measurement of Payment 7.1 Production of Beach Compatible Sand Payment for labor, materials, equipment, and all incidental thereto for the excavation, production delivery of the beach compatible sand shall be i n Item "Production of Beach Compatible Sand." 7.2 Sand Testing other appropriate costs in connection therewith or screening, washing, stockpiling, and loading for cluded in the applicable unit price per ton for Bid Payment for labor, materials, equipment, and all other appropriate costs in connection therewith or incidental thereto for the sand testing and i aporting shall be included in the applicable unit price per test for Proposal Item "Sand Testing." The OWNER reserves the right to delete this item and conduct the testing using his representatives. 8.0 Quality Control In the event test sampling results, visual product observations, or environmental monitoring reveals a violation of standards set forth in the specifications and permits, the CONTRACTOR shall describe the violation in the daily report in the usual manner and notify the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL immediately upon detection of the violation with an action plan to remedy or correct the violation. The CONTRACTOR has the sole responsibility for quality control and shall provide and maintain such an effective program. The CONTRACTOR shall have qualified personnel to provide and maintain control for all operations. The CONTRACTOR shall establish and implement a quality control program to inspect and test the CONTRACTOR's and SUBCONTRACTOR's equipment used in completing the WORK. The CONTRACTOR shall furnish to the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL within five (5) calendar days after receiving the "Notice to Proceed" a quality control plan outlining the procedures, instructions and reports that will be used. This document shall include, at a minimum, the following: a) Structure of the quality control organization. b) Number and qualifications of the responsible personnel. c) Methods and documentation to assure quality control. d) Safety inspection procedures. e) Copy of sample report forms and inspection documents that will be submitted weekly. f) Storm Emergency Plan. No WORK shall commence until the CONTRACTOR's OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. If, during the deemed by the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL PROFESSIONAL may require corrective actions to recc quality control program shall be part of control supervis allowed to be submitted for separate payment. quality control program is approved by the WORK process the quality control system is to be inadequate, the OWNER and DESIGN ify said deficiencies. The CONTRACTOR's ion as field overhead costs and shall not be RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand 9.0 Permits . age 15 16V Permits required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection for the WORK to be performed are attached. Prior to issuance of an award of contract, the CONTRACTOR shall acknowledge receipt of the permits and accepts full responsibility for compliance with these permits and all stipulations attached, for all WORK covered by this Scope of Services. The CONTRACTOR will immediately notify the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL in writing of any observed non - compliance with Federal, State or local laws or regulations governing this WORK. The CONTRACTOR shall, after such notice, immediately inform the OWNER and DESIGN PROFESSIONAL of proposed corrective action and take such action as may be approved. If the CONTRACTOR fails or refuses to comply promptly, the OWNER may notify appropriate permit agencies and issue an order stopping all or part of the WORK until satisfactory corrective action has been taken. No part of the time lost due to any such stop orders shall be made the subject of a claim for extension of time or for excess costs or damages by the CONTRACTOR. Any costs incurred by the OWNER as a result of such actions may be deducted from the amount due the CONTRACTOR. Oct 30 01 11:03a Carl McCollum 863 - 6796981 p.4 RFP No. 0 1-3272 - Production of Beach Compatible Sand Faze 16 EX- HIBIT B PUBLIC PAYMENT BOND Production of Beach Compatible Sand Bond No_ 929191947 Contract No. 01 -3272 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That E.R. Jahna Industries Inc. , as Principal, and Continental Casualty Company as Surety, located at 2600 Lucien Way, Suite 130, Maitland, FL 32751 (Business Address) are held and firmly bound to Collier county, Florida as Oblige in the sum of Sixty Nine Thousand, three hundred dollars ($ 69,300.00 ) for the payment whereof we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severally. WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a contract dated as of the 1st day of December 2001, with Oblige for Production of beach compatible sand in accordance with drawings and specifications, which contract is incorporated a part hereof, and is referred to as the Contract. THE CONDITION OF THIS BOND is that if Principal: by reference and made Promptly makes payment to all claimants as defined in Section 255.05(1), Florida Statutes, supplying Principal with labor, materials or supplies, used directly or indirectly by Principal in the prosecution of the work provided for in the Contract, then this bond is void; otherwise it remains in full fo rce. Any changes in or under the Contract and compliance or noncompliance with any formalities connected with the Contract or the changes do not affect Sureties obligation under this Bond. The provisions of this bond are subject to the time limitations of Section 255.05(2). In no event will the Surety be liable in the aggregate to claimants for more than the penal sum of this Payment Bond, regardless of the number of suits that may be filed by claimants. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this instrument this iRt_ day of November 2001, the name of each party being affixed and these presents duly signed by its under - signed representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body. Oct 30 01 11:04a Carl McCollum RFP No(O1 -3272 - Production of Beach Compatible Sand aCal. i awmmm STATE OF _��a•�• COUNTY OF��l,- The foregoing instrument was 01, by A z/ ,, i es 863- 6796981 P.6 r. Pace 16 �+ � OR As Attorney in Fact (Attach Power of Attorney) John Hughes (Printed Name) 402 S Kentucky Avenue Suite 460 Lakeland FL 33801 (Business Address) 863 - 686 -1161 (Telephone Number) acknowledged before me this day oi'�- Z_�»�.��.z. as urety, on behalf of Sur ty. He /She is personally known to me OR has pr6duced as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. My Commission Expires: (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) r ignature) Name: / F / /!� (Legibly Printed) Notary Public, State of: Coma BERTHA Notary Public, State of Florida My comm. expires Feb. 13, 2003 ••�.�,� Comm. No. CC799345 Oct 30 01 11:03a Carl McCollum 863 - 6796981 p.5 RFP No. 01 -3272 - Production of Beach Compatible Sand Signed, seated aq del in the presence V. as to Principal STATE OF COUNTY OF 1 Pagel 6 r � V PRINCIPAL The fore ping instrume was acknowledged before me this 5�` day of 2001, by as / cf %,�corpo ation, on behalf of the corporation. He /she is p (A'sonally known to me OR has produced as identification and did (did not) tale an oath. My Commission Expires: 1C /, /c -2 nature of Notary) NAME: s�v��a 1�' a (Legibly Printed) (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) Notary Public, State of Commission No.- 7 73(e y o ATTEST: SURETY: Witnesses to Surety (Printed Name) (Business Address (Authorized Signature) (Printed Name) POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTO AC-FA;1C5T0 Know All Men By These Presents, That CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, a Connecticut corporation, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania corporation (herein collectively called "the CNA Surety Companies "), are duty organized and existing corporations having their principal offices in the City of Chicago, and State of Illinois, and that they do by virtue of the signature and seals herein affixed hereby make, constitute and appoint Carlos K Sutton, John Hughes, Individually of Lakeland, Florida their true and lawful Attomey(s) -in -Fact with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, seal and execute for and on their behalf bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of similar nature - In Unlimited Amounts - and to bind them thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed by a duly authorized officer of their corporations and all the acts of said Attorney, pursuant to the authority hereby given are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the By -Laws and Resolutions, printed on the reverse hereof, duly adopted, as indicated, by the Boards of Directors of the corporations. In Witness Whereof, the CNA Sureties Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Group Vice President and their corporate seals to be hereto affixed on this 1st day of January , 1996 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA S•"�0t"01wto JULY 11, °v SEAL Isu� M.C. Vonnahme Group Vice President State of Illinois, County of Cook, ss On this 1 st day of January , 1996 , before me personally came M. C. Vonnahme to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say: that he resides in the Village of Darien State of Illinois; that he is a Group Vice President of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seals of said corporations; that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such corporate seals; that they were so affixed pursuant to authority given by the Boards of Directors of said corporations and that he signed his name thereto pursuant to like authority, and acknowledges same to be the act and deed of said corporations. PG. D �o s J NOTARY PUBLJC coot co \ \'. My Commission Expires October 19, 1998 Linda C. Dempsey Notary Public CERTIFICATE I, John M. Littler , Assistant Secretary of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA do hereby certify that the Power of Attorney herein above set forth is still in force, and further certify that the By -Law and Resolution of the Board of Directors of each corporation printed on the reverse hereof are still in force. In testimony whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seals of the said corporations this 1st day of November , 2001 F v °v SEAL 1897 (Rev.7 /14195) irk JULY 31, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA John M. Littler Assistant Secretary Authorizing By -Laws and Resolutions 16C_15% ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY: This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By -Law duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company. "Article IX-- Execution of Documents Section 3. Appointment of Attorney-in-fact. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President may, from time to time, appoint by written certificates attomeys -in -fact to act in behalf of the Company in the execution of policies of insurance, bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of like nature. Such attomeys -in -fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution of any such instruments and to attach the seal of the Company thereto. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President or the Board of Directors, may, at any time, revoke all power and authority previously given to any attomey -in -fact. This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 17th day of February, 1993. "Resolved, that the signature of the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney granted pursuant to Section 3 of Article IX of the By -Laws, and the signature of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any certificate of any such power and any power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed shall, with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, continue to be valid and binding on the Company." ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA: This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By -Law duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company. "Article VI-- Execution of Obligations and Appointment of Attomey-in -Fact Section 2. Appointment of Attorney-in-fact. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President may, from time to time, appoint by written certificates attomeys -in -fact to act in behalf of the Company in the execution of policies of insurance, bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of like nature. Such attorneys-in-fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution of any such instruments and to attach the seal of the Company thereto. The President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President may at any time revoke all power and authority previously given to any attorney-in-fact." This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 17th day of February, 1993. "Resolved, that the signature of the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney granted pursuant to Section 2 of Article VI of the By -Laws, and the signature of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any certificate of any such power and any power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed shall, with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, continue to be valid and binding on the Company." ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD: This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following Resolution duly adopted on February 17, 1993 by the Board of Directors of the Company. "RESOLVED: That the President, an Executive Vice President, or any Senior or Group Vice President of the Corporation may, from time to time, appoint, by written certificates, Attomeys -in -Fact to act in behalf of the Corporation in the execution of policies of insurance, bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of like nature. Such Attomey -in -Fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority, shall have full power to bind the Corporation by their signature and execution of any such instrument and to attach the seal of the Corporation thereto. The President, an Executive Vice President, any Senior or Group Vice President or the Board of Directors may at any time revoke all power and authority previously given to any Attomey -in- Fact " This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 17th day of February, 1993. "RESOLVED: That the signature of the President, an Executive Vice President or any Senior or Group Vice President and the seal of the Corporation may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney granted pursuant to the Resolution adopted by this Board of Directors on February 17, 1993 and the signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Corporation may be affixed by facsimile to any certificate of any such power, and any power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Corporation. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed, shall with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, continue to be valid and binding on the Corporation" Oct 30 01 11:04a Carl McCollum 863- 6796981 p.7 F- FP No. 01 -3272 - ?roduction of Beach Compatible Sand Page 19 EXHIBIT C 16CI!r PUBLIC PERFORMANCE BOND Production of )Beach Compatible Sant! Bond No. 929191947 Contract No. 01 -3272 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That E.R. Jahna Industries Inc. as Principal, and Continental Casualty Company as Surety, located at 2600 Lucien way, Suite 130 Maitland, FL 32751 (Business Address) are held and firmly bound to Collier County, Florida as Oblige in the sum of Sixty nine thousand three hundred dollars ($ 69,300.00 ) for the payment whereof we bond ourselves, our heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severally. - WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a contract dated as of the 1st day of December , 2001, with Oblige for Production of beach compatible sand in accordance with drawings and specifications, which contract is incorporated by reference and made a part hereof, and is referred to as the Contract. THE CONDITION OF THIS BOND is that if Principal: 1. Performs the Contract at the times and in the manner prescribed in the Contract; and 2. Pays Oblige any and all losses, damages, costs and attorneys' fees that Oblige sustains because of any default by Principal under the Contract, including, but not limited to, all delay damages, whether liquidated or actual, incurred by Oblige; and 3. Performs the guarantee of all work and materials furnished under the Contract for the time specified in the Contract, then this bond is void; otherwise it remains in full force. Any changes in or under the Contract and compliance or noncompliance with any formalities connected with the Contract or the changes do not affect Sureties obligation under this Bond. The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no changes, extensions of time, alterations or additions to the terms of the Contract or other work to be performed hereunder, or the specifications referred to therein shall in anywise affect its obligations under this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extensions of time, alterations or additions to the terms of the Contract or to work or to the specifications. Oct 30 01 11:04a Carl McCollum RFP No. 01 -3272 - Production of Beach Compatible Sand 863 - 6796981 Ip. SuC Page 20 This instrument shall be construed in all respects as a common law bond. It is expressly understood that the time provisions and statute of limitations under Section 255.05, Florida Statutes, shall not apply to this bond. In no event will the Surety be liable in the aggregate to Oblige for more than the penal sure of this Performance Bond regardless of the number of suits that may be filed by Oblige. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this instrument this 1st day of November , 2001, the name of each party being affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body. Signed, sealed and 46111 bred in the ordse ce of:,�' as to Principal PRINCIPAL E R Jahna 11 ustries Inc BY: NAME: Ronald C Johnson ITS: Executive Vice President STATE OF cam. COUNTY OF Pa-=eA_. The foregoing instru ent was acknowledged before me this day of >> 2001, by GP . Ga -e'- z , as p # ru a corporation, on behalf of the corpor on. He /s#& is personally known to me OR has produced IM as identification and did (did not) take an oa h. My Commission Expires: /C /'/'1z l� " /��� —�� �gnature) Name: - J-L;,:3 Tim V i J l LKeAL -- (Legibly Printed) (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) Notary Public, State of: Commission No.: D ;lSJr C ., C -7 7 36fb l Oct 30 01 11:04a Carl McCollum 863 - 6796981 P.9 RY11 No. 01 -327 , _ Production of Beach Comalable Sand Page 2 1 b C (50* -•»� ATTEST: SURETY: (Printed Name) (Business Address) (Authorized Signature) Witnelsses as to Surety � n Flit, 11 K 1 fil - - I " I f (Printed Name) OR As Attorney in Fact (Attach Power of Attorney) Jahn Hughes (Printed Name) 402 S Kentucky Avenue Suite 460 Lakeland FL 33801 (Business Address) (Telephone Number) STATE OF : do COUNTY OF e ' The foreg ing instrument was acknowledged before me this, 2 1 day of � /�,,,,_�C�� _ 2001, by - 4,, , s- as i? f — Z/ � of ,3 ,L, 1C Surety, o behalf of Surety. /She is personally known to me OR has produced Cyr i'l _ as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. My Commission Expires: (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) /(Signature � r ' Name: �- �/- %,� /C - (LeEibly Printed) Notary Public, State of: Commission No,: R. CROHN z Notary P blic, State of Florida s My comm. expires Feb. 13, 2003 Comm. No. CC799345 Authorizing By -Laws and Resolutions ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY: ` This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By -Law duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company. "Article IX— Execution of Documents Section 3. Appointment of Attomey -in -fact. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President may, from time to time, appoint by written certificates attomeys -in -fact to act in behalf of the Company in the execution of policies of insurance, bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of like nature. Such attomeys -in -fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution of any such instruments and to attach the seal of the Company thereto. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President or the Board of Directors, may, at any time, revoke all power and authority previously given to any attomey -in -fact. This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 17th day of February, 1993. "Resolved, that the signature of the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney granted pursuant to Section 3 of Article IX of the By -Laws, and the signature of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any certificate of any such power and any power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed shall, with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, continue to be valid and binding on the Company." ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA: This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By -Law duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company. "Article VI— Execution of Obligations and Appointment of Attomey -in -Fact Section 2. Appointment of Attomey -in -fact. The Chairman of the Board of Directors, the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President may, from time to time, appoint by written certificates attorneys -in -fact to act in behalf of the Company in the execution of policies of insurance, bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of like nature. Such attomeys -in -fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution of any such instruments and to attach the seal of the Company thereto. The President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President may at any time revoke all power and authority previously given to any attorney-in-fact." This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 17th day of February, 1993. "Resolved, that the signature of the President or any Executive, Senior or Group Vice President and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney granted pursuant to Section 2 of Article VI of the By -Laws, and the signature of the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any certificate of any such power and any power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Company. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed shall, with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, continue to be valid and binding on the Company." ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD: This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following Resolution duly adopted on February 17, 1993 by the Board of Directors of the Company. "RESOLVED: That the President, an Executive Vice President, or any Senior or Group Vice President of the Corporation may, from time to time, appoint, by written certificates, Attomeys -in -Fact to act in behalf of the Corporation in the execution of policies of insurance, bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of like nature. Such Attomey -in -Fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective certificates of authority, shall have full power to bind the Corporation by their signature and execution of any such instrument and to attach the seal of the Corporation thereto. The President, an Executive Vice President, any Senior or Group Vice President or the Board of Directors may at any time revoke all power and authority previously given to any Attomey -in- Fact." This Power of Attorney is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company at a meeting duly called and held on the 17th day of February, 1993. "RESOLVED: That the signature of the President, an Executive Vice President or any Senior or Group Vice President and the seal of the Corporation may be affixed by facsimile on any power of attorney granted pursuant to the Resolution adopted by this Board of Directors on February 17, 1993 and the signature of a Secretary or an Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Corporation may be affixed by facsimile to any certificate of any such power, and any power or certificate bearing such facsimile signature and seal shall be valid and binding on the Corporation. Any such power so executed and sealed and certified by certificate so executed and sealed, shall with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached, continue to be valid and binding on the Corporation." 16 Ur , POWER OF ATTORNEY APPOINTING INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEY -IN-FACT Know All Men By These Presents, That CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, a Connecticut corporation, AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania corporation (herein collectively called "the CNA Surety Companies "), are duly organized and existing corporations having their principal offices in the City of Chicago, and State of Illinois, and that they do by virtue of the signature and seals herein affixed hereby make, constitute and appoint Carlos K. Sutton, John Hughes, Individually of Lakeland, Florida their true and lawful Attomey(s) -in -Fact with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, seal and execute for and on their behalf bonds, undertakings and other obligatory instruments of similar nature - In Unlimited Amounts - and to bind them thereby as fully and to the same extent as if such instruments were signed by a duly authorized officer of their corporations and all the acts of said Attorney, pursuant to the authority hereby given are hereby ratified and confirmed. This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the By -Laws and Resolutions, printed on the reverse hereof, duly adopted, as indicated, by the Boards of Directors of the corporations. In Witness Whereof, the CNA Sureties Companies have caused these presents to be signed by their Group Vice President and their corporate seals to be hereto affixed on this 1st day of January , 1996 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY �� ��� NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD S `f AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA o y l Y 31. J SEAL C 1902.E 1897 1 • M.C. Vonnahme Group Vice President State of Illinois, County of Cook, ss On this 1st day of January , 1996 , before me personally came M. C. Vonnahme to me known, who, being by me duly swom, did depose and say: that he resides in the Village of Darien , State of Illinois; that he is a Group Vice President of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA described in and which executed the above instrument; that he knows the seals of said corporations; that the seals affixed to the said instrument are such corporate seals; that they were so affixed pursuant to authority given by the Boards of Directors of said corporations and that he signed his name thereto pursuant to like authority, and acknowledges same to be the act and deed of said corporations. PG. D 20 s v OTAff PUBUC 2 �O-k �JC." My Commission Expires October 19, 1998 Linda C. Dempsey Notary Public CERTIFICATE I, John M. Littler Assistant Secretary of CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, and AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA do hereby certify that the Power of Attomey herein above set forth is still in force, and further certify that the By -Law and Resolution of the Board of Directors of each corporation printed on the reverse hereof are still in force. In testimony whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seals of the said corporations this 1st day of November 2001• CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY NATIONAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD t�r OpAre AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA Eo � • IDLY 71 >� $ �J SEAL 1897 1 • John M. Littler Assistant Secretary (Rev.7/14195) RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand � 2� Page 22 16 As part of the Bid, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish to the OWNER a Geological Report entitled "Guide for Reporting the Geological Data for the Proposed Sand Source" and described herein. The following criteria are recommended as the minimum standard for reporting the geological data for the proposed beach compatible sand source. The Geological Report shall be prepared, signed, and sealed by a licensed Professional Geologist or Professional Engineer with expertise in geological and geotechnical science and engineering. The CONTRACTOR shall also furnish to the OWNER five (5) gallon bulk samples representative of the sand source. The CONTRACTOR shall review the Scope of Services that includes Beach Compatible Sand Specifications and additional guidelines for determining compatibility. The Geological Report shall demonstrate to the OWNER that the proposed sand source is compatible with the native beaches of Collier County. The Geological Report and bulk samples shall be used by *the OWNER to evaluate the compatibility of the proposed sand source. The OWNER reserves the right to conduct a site inspection of the proposed sand source to verify any submitted information. EVALUATION CRITERIA INFORMATION A. General 1. Purpose of Report Statement of person for whom the Report was prepared; Description of work performed 2. Statement of Experience Statement of experience of Professional who prepared the Report 3. Sand Source Description Description of sand source, magnitude of project, background, and business arrangement 4. Sand Source Location Description of location of sand source (county, city, section, township, range, northing, easting, etc...); Map showing location and access 5. Property Ownership Description of ownership of surface rights, mineral rights, access rights, legal rights, concessions, royalties, and other encumbrances and liabilities; Evidence of necessary permits and rights for use of sand source 6. Survey Survey indicating property boundaries, existing grades, level of mean high and low water tables, excavation limits, limits of property vegetation including mangroves, cypress or other wetland species, proposed excavation volume, site access for trucks, stockpile location, and legal description RFP No. 01-3272 Production of Beach Compatible Sand EVALUATION CRITERIA INFORMATION B. Project Data 1. Location of Project Data Maps and cross sections showing locations of samples, drill holes, exploration pits, and geological data; Depth to top and bottom of sand, total length and elevation of sediment horizons; Accuracy of survey information including downhole surveys; Proposed excavation grades 2. Geological Data Description of nature, detail, and reliability of geological information; Description of geophysical and geochemical data; Reliable geological maps and cross sections to support interpretations; Description of thoroughness with which all significant lithologic, structural, mineralogical, alteration, or other geological or geotechnical characteristics were recorded; Discussion on significant data that could materially influence the estimated quantity and quality of the sand source 3. Sampling a. Method Description of sample type and collection method; Discussion on sample quality and representativeness; Adequate sampling verification techniques including appropriate numbers of duplicates and statistical analyses b. Preparation Description of laboratory and method used for sample preparation, subsampling and size reduction, and likelihood of inadequate or nonrepresentative samples; Verification of suitability of sample preparation c. Analysis Identification of laboratory and analytical methods; Discussion of precision and accuracy including the use of check assays; Description and verification of quality control program; Verification of analytical techniques; Reports of Grain Size Distribution made by state certified laboratory including sieves: 2 ",1" 314 ", 1/2 ", 3/8 ", No.4, No.8, No.10, No.16, No.20, No.40, No. 60, No. 80, No.100, No. 140, No.200, and plotted on Reference Range for Beach Grain Size Distribution contained in the Bid Documents RFP No. 01 -3272 — Production of Beach Compatible Sand EVALUATION CRITERIA INFORMATION Page 2416 cl d. Volume Calculation Discussion of how volume was measured and calculated including by what method and how frequently; Discussion of whether different volume factors were used in different parts of source and why; Verification that methods used adequately accounted for void spaces and differences between rock and alteration zones within source C. Geological Interpretation Description of geological characteristics of sand source; Discussion of adequacy of data density and reliability and whether quality and quantity of information are sufficient to support conclusions D. Extraction 1. Excavation Description and justification of excavation method(s) to be used; Discussion of excavation rate, equipment selected, sediment control methods, geotechnical and hydrological considerations, and personnel requirements; 2. Processing Description and justification of processing method(s) and equipment to be used, plant capacity, and personnel requirements; Justification of estimated production and basis for justifications such as historical information, laboratory tests, or previous plant results 3. Environmental Description of environmental compliance requirements and Compliance methods for compliance E. Assurance Classification Description and justification of criteria used to classify reserves; Classifications of reserves as proven or probable reflecting degree of geological assurance; Only measured and indicated resources shall be included in reserves F. Other Considerations Discussion of any other material information affecting the project; Previous permits issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection or U.S. Army Corps of Engineers indicating the sand source is beach compatible 16C16 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 loc � '7 MEMORANDUM Date: October 25, 2001 To: James McGee, P.E., Project Manager Public Utilities From: Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SEWER INTERCONNECT Enclosed please find four (4) original documents as referenced above, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 23, 2001 (Agenda Item # 16B8 /moved from Item # 16C 17). If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 774 -8411 Thank you. Enclosures I(�C 17 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SEWER INTERCONNECT This Agreement is made and entered into between the City of Naples, Florida, a Florida municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY ") and the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (hereinafter together referred to as the "COUNTY "). "PARTIES" shall refer to either or both entities. WHEREAS, CITY and COUNTY may experience emergency situations created by hydraulic overload, equipment failure, natural disasters, or other circumstances at Water Reclamation Facilities or Collection Systems; and WHEREAS, CITY and COUNTY, as neighboring local governments, agree that it is in the best interest of the public's health and safety to provide adequate and reliable collection and treatment of sewage; and WHEREAS, CITY and COUNTY as neighboring local governments with existing sewer facilities that may be capable of furnishing limited sewer service to each other, agree to enter into an agreement outlining the terms upon which emergency sewer service may be provided to each other. The PARTY receiving the service shall be referred to as "CUSTOMER" and the PARTY providing the service referred to as PROVIDER; and NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed: 1. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, PARTIES agree to provide to each other such emergency sewer service as is available within the respective wastewater systems that is over and above the needs and demands of the providing entity and the customers of its sewer service area. 2. Sewer service under this Agreement shall be provided through approved constructed interconnecting facilities as specified in Attachment A, where the PARTIES' sewer systems are in close proximity. The approximate locations are to be mutually agreed upon in writing. The nature of the emergency and availability of sewer service shall dictate the number and locations of the Interconnects activated. The CUSTOMER shall identify to the PROVIDER, the Interconnect it desires to be activated, subject to limitations in availability of the PROVIDER. Said interconnecting facilities, referred to herein as "The Interconnect ", shall Page 1 ....� v 4 be constructed in either a temporary or permanent manner as is shown 1 C conceptually in Attachment A of this Agreement. 3. The PARTIES will share all mutually agreed costs for design and construction of The Interconnect equally. All estimated costs for design and construction of the Interconnect(s) will be reviewed and approved by both PARTIES prior to the commencement of construction. County shall be responsible for the management of design and construction of the Interconnects with feedback and approval from the City. Both PARTIES shall approve required change orders. 4. Both PARTIES agree that this agreement shall not apply to reasons of exceeded design or capacity limits on plant or infrastructure facilities. Each PARTY shall have an opportunity to request a variance to this item from the other PARTY'S governing board. 5. Any time a sewer interconnect is to be utilized the providing PARTY will present assurances to the receiving PARTY that the waste stream being sent to the collection system does not contain any objectionable substances that may have a negative effect to the treatment facility. Objectionable wastes are defined by reference to the receiving PARTY'S Industrial Waste Pretreatment ordinance. 6. If it is determined that the receiving PARTY'S infrastructure or biological treatment is upset due to industrial toxins then the supplying PARTY shall be responsible for any costs to correct the damage. 7. Subsequent to completion of construction of The Interconnect, ownership of that portion of The Interconnect up to and including the isolation valve which controls the flow of waste water entering into or being received from The Interconnect shall be owned by the PARTY owning the system to which the valve controls access. Ownership of the physical interconnect from isolation valve to isolation valve shall be the property of the COUNTY. Maintenance, repair, removal, and /or replacement of the mutually -owned portion of The Interconnect shall be the responsibility of the COUNTY to administer with the costs being borne equally by the PARTIES. 8. The Interconnect shall be designed to include provisions for locking features on the isolation valves so that each party can have individual keyed access. Each PARTY shall have sole access to its locking device for its valve operator which, when opened, provides sewer service to, or receives sewer service from, the other PARTY. 9. Sewer service provided under the provisions of this Agreement shall be only that sewer service needed to provide temporary assistance in the event the PARTIES have an emergency need for sewer service. Sewer service shall be provided subject to the following conditions: Page 2 R a. Each PARTY shall designate a member of its regular staff who shall I�L17 receive all requests, and who shall have the authority to summarily approve or disapprove the respective request(s). b. Each request for emergency sewer service shall be acted upon in good faith and in a prompt and timely manner by both PARTIES. Time is of the essence in such matters. The PARTIES are not obligated to accept any specific volumes of wastewater, and termination of service shall occur when the emergency need for the respective emergency sewer service no longer exists. C. The PARTIES shall exercise prompt and diligent efforts to eliminate its need for emergency sewer service. d. Both PARTIES shall be notified by their own staff any time a sewer interconnect is to be utilized. Notification will include the reason for use, estimated duration and any other related information. 10. At its discretion, the receiving PARTY may establish and enforce by unilateral control of valves limits as to: times of day /or days of the week during which treatment will be provided; the rates of flow, and total volume of sewage over designated periods. 11. It is mutually agreed that whenever sewer service is provided under the terms of this Agreement, the PROVIDER shall be paid at the CUSTOMER'S current rate, plus a 25 percent surcharge. 12. This Agreement shall remain in full force and affect for five years from the date of this Agreement and shall be renewable upon written agreement by both PARTIES. 13. If any condition or provision contained in this Agreement is held to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other condition or provision and does not materially prejudice either PARTY in its respective rights and obligations contained in the remaining valid conditions or provisions of this Agreement. 14. No waiver of any breach of this Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any other subsequent breach. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES hereto have made and executed this Agreement on the respective dates under each signature: COLLIER COUNTY through its BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, signing by and through its Chairman, authorized to execute same by Board Action on the *13 day of , 2001; and CITY OF NAPLES through its CITY COUNCIL, signing by and through Page 3 -1 its Mayor, authorized to execute same by Council action on the _ffiLday I�Ll of September, 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND AS THE ?f' GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING J BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY WATER,�,i1u.i % +tsri.,.,; ioc SEWER Dwightz?,B 1 �,at.Mti y. By: V S Jam Carter, Ph.D., C airman Date: /67013-401 Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney ATTEST: City Clerk Tara A. Norma Approved as to form and legal sufficiency, 954091 9-18-01 CITY OF NAPLES, FLORIDA �a'-%municipal corporation J/) JL _ i�i��• _ _N/ Y / 1 Bonnie McKenzie, Mayor Date: a L Page 4 •• A1110 i to C, 17 ATTACHMENT A Interconnect Conceptual Detall COLLIER PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEERING Drawn by, Jlm Date, 7/16/61 File, IntConExbl,dwg WORK ORDER # BSSW -00 -15 1t)DI f Agreement for Fixed Term Professional Architectural Services Dated August 3, 1999 (Contract #99 -2930 This Work Order is for professional architectural services for work known as Immokolee Branch Library Expansion Reason for Prolect� li bra ry received $340,000 State of Florida Library Construction Grant to enlarge the Immokalee Branch. Matching funds Of $340.000 are available in the Library's Impact Fee Fund The work is specified in the proposal dated August 31, 2001, which is attached hereto and made a part of this Work Order. In accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement referenced above, Work Order # --------- BSSW-00 -15- is assigned to -------- - - - - -- --------- BoranySchmittSummersWeaver and Partners Incorporated (Firm Name) Scop-e of Work_ (List all tasks: Task 1, Task z, etc.) See Attached Proposal. Schedule of Work_ Complete work within 330 (includes actual construction, also) days from receipt of' the Notice to Proceed authorizing start of work. Work needs to be completed to enable the addition to be constructed by September 30, 2002. Lomp-ensation_ In accordance with Article Five of the Agreement, the County will compensate the Firm in accordance with the negotiated lump sum amount indicated in the schedule below (if a task is time and material, so indicate and use the established hourly rate(s) as enumerated in Schedule "A" of the Agreement). Building design: Architect's fees $58,000 Sitework design: Civil Engineering and SDP documents. $12,000 Landscape design $ 1,250 Surveying $ 4,500 Direct project expenses (reimbursable time & material) $ 600 Total Professional Fees $ 76,350 Any change within monetary authority of this Work Order made subsequent to final department approval will be considered an additional service and charged according to Schedule "A" of the Agreement. PREPARED BY: ?�CG7�.� Q— U / Marilyn Mat efrN s, Assistant Library Director Date AUTHORIZED B ' cr"- _ Q -1 a —0 John Jones, Library Director Date APPROVED BY: !d /o/ Facilities Department Director Date Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney ACCEPTED BY: Date: ATTEST: Name of Firm (Corporate Secretary) By: 0. By: �i,gnatu�',, -•� Type Name and Title ATTEST: 01"{GH't E OPP*OL It RFP #99-2930 Rey- o Effective August 3, 1999 tI - W llgnawv �1ilryyp,s Note: BCC needs to authorize the dollar amount and request the BCC to authorize the Facilities Department Director to execute the Work Order as part of your Executive Summary. BaranyS chmittSummersWe aver A N D P A R T N E R S I N C O R P O R A T E D 16D1�r+ August 13, 2001 ,Joseph A Barany, AIA Eugene C. Schmitt, AIA Daniel A. Summers, AIA PROPOSAL FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND PLANNING SERVICES Ronald G. Weaver, AIA COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY, IMMOKALEE BRANCH Kenneth L. Lamers, RA Kenneth G. Aliff, AIA A. Scope of Project Fort Myers Office. 1. Prepare construction documents for addition to the Collier County Library, 1520 Royal Palm Sq. Blvd. Immokalee branch. Suite 300 Fort Myers, FL 33919 B. Scope of Basic Services 941,!278 -3838 FAX 941/275-5356 1. Prepare construction contract documents, bidding assistance and BSSWftm@aol.com construction contract administration services for the addition and limited renovation of the existing structure as described is the schematic design documents and abbreviated specifications dated March 27, 2000. Naples Office: 5185 Castello Drive C. Professional Fees Suite 4 Naples, FL 34103 1. Fees for Professional Services outlined: Seventy six thousand three 941/643-3103 hundred fifty dollars. FAX 941/643-7435 RSSWnap; ulaoicom Building design: Architect's fees $ 58,000.00 Sitework Design: Civil engineering and License # AA C001863 SDP documents. 12,000.00 Landscape design 1,250.00 Surveying 4,500.00 Direct project expenses. 600.00 Total professional fees $ 76,350.00 D. Additional Services 1. Additional services for work performed outside the scope of work described in Basic Services shall be billed at published hourly rates or negotiated sum determined at the time of the request for such services, and approved by the owner. No additional services may be performed without written authorization of the owner. 1601 .. Proposal for Architectural & Planning Services Collier County Public Library, Immokalee Branch Marilyn Matthes 13, august 2001 Page —2- E. Reimbursable Expenses 1. Direct expenses related to the project, such as cost of document reproduction, long distance telephone charges, travel expenses and other necessary expenses are included as a flat fee of $ 600.00. F. Time 1. Architect will coordinate with Library Staff to meet grant requirements and schedule. G. Services not included 1. Interior Design, furnishings and layouts. 2. Communications — Telephone, Cable TV design /specifications. 3. Library and Information Technology Systems design /specifications. Agreed and Accepted Daniel A. Summers, AIA, V.P. Date BARANY SCHMITT SUMMERS WEAVER AND PARTNERS, INC. Marilyn Matthes, Assistant Director Date COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY DAS: kk 1 MEMORANDUM Date: October 25, 2001 To: Leo Ochs Assistant County Manager From: Maureen Kenyon, Supervisor`' Minutes & Records Department Re: Interlocal Agreement with the School Board Enclosed please find the original document referenced above and approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 23, 2001, (Agenda Item #16D3). Please forward the agreement to the School Board for the required signature and upon completion, kindly return one fully executed original document to Minutes & Records . If you should have any questions, please contact me at: 774 -8399. Thank you. Enclosures O 6 O O N W P4 H V W P4 O x V a �s. M a. � awe Cp a Pa a� a V V Cr? W aw �y o an V x pG CD PW Qo P ao o 0 00 Pq N Pq \ Q M a a 0 0 a w ac A H 04 � wt 00 W V Nom° O N ad it e� .j OG W. 4V a a W. h w z oa oe v " as 16D3 1 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN COLLIER COUNTY AND THE DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this a3 , 1 day of 2001, by and between the District School Board of Collier County, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY." RECITALS: WHEREAS, COUNTY has appropriated two - hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) in the fiscal year 2001/2002 general fund budget for the sole and exclusive purpose of assisting the Grantee to expand and enhance its School Nurse Program; and WHEREAS, The Grantee is responsible for the School Nurse Program management, administration and implementation; and WHEREAS, GRANTEE agrees to use the entire two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to expand and enhance existing school nursing services in the schools; and WHEREAS, The County validates this expenditure as having a public purpose of enhancing student learning and authorizes the Clerk of the Circuit Court to make the disbursement of funds outlined herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BASED UPON THE MUTUAL CONVENANTS AND PROMISES PROVIDED HEREIN, AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. SCOPE OF WORK: The GRANTEE shall provide additional school health nursing services as outlined in its School Nurse Program. mot+ CX31 2. DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS The County shall disburse the entire two hundred fifty thousand dollars a c+7 ($250,000) to Grantee no later than November 30, 2001. The amount to be paid by the County N �1 shall not exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) in fiscal year 2001 /2002. a 0 3. ELIGIBLE EXPENDITURES: Only eligible expenditures described in the Grantee's School Nurse Program plan will be paid by COUNTY. Any expenditures paid by COUNTY which are later deemed to be ineligible expenditures shall be repaid to COUNTY within 30 days of County's written request to repay said funds. COUNTY may request repayment of funds for a period of up to one year after termination of this Agreement or any extension or renewal thereof. 4. REPORTS: GRANTEE shall provide to the County quarterly reports of Grantee's service activity data for all services provided within the School Nurse Program beginning January 1, 2002. GRANTEE shall comply with additional periodic program report requests by the County within 30 days of request. Grantee is not required to provide the County with any confidential student records or information, 2 1603'i 5. NOTICES: All notices from COUNTY to GRANTEE shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to GRANTEE at the following address: Associate Superintendent for Operational Services 3710 Estey Avenue Naples, Fl. 34104 -4499 All notices from GRANTEE to COUNTY shall be in writing and deemed duly served if mailed &A-) by registered or certified mail to COUNTY to: 00 co Assistant County Manager c 5 3301 Tamiami Trail East w Naples, Florida 34112 M C71% GRANTEE and COUNTY may change the above mailing addresses at any time upon N o giving the other party written notification pursuant to this Section. 6. NO PARTNERSHIP: Nothing herein contained shall be construed as creating a partnership between COUNTY and GRANTEE, or its vendor or subcontractor, or to constitute GRANTEE, or its vendor or subcontractor, as an agent or employee of COUNTY. COUNTY sole responsibility under this Agreement is to disburse the funds to GRANTEE. 7. TERMINATION: COUNTY or GRANTEE may cancel this Agreement with or without cause by giving 30 days advance written notice of such termination pursuant to Section 8 and specifying the effective date of termination. 8. AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS: GRANTEE shall maintain records, books, documents, papers, and financial information pertaining to work performed under this Agreement, except for confidential student records. GRANTEE agrees that COUNTY, or any of its duly authorized representatives, shall, until the expiration of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement, have access to, and the right to examine and photocopy any W 16D3 pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of GRANTEE involving transactions related to this Agreement. 9. PROHIBITION OF ASSIGNMENT: GRANTEE shall not assign, convey, or transfer in whole or in part its interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of the COUNTY. 10. TERM: This Agreement shall become effective upon approval by all parties hereto IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTEE and COUNTY have each respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. 1`EST.�' 1�r1 . DW10"I3T 8. BROCK, Clef BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 4 ri ,�. R�w �l .. - and shall remain effective until September 30, 2002. oO°o c� 11. AMENDMENTS: This Agreement may only be amended by mutual agreement of a.. the parties. N CSl N 12. RECORDING: This Agreement shall be recorded in the public records of Collier a 0 County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTEE and COUNTY have each respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. 1`EST.�' 1�r1 . DW10"I3T 8. BROCK, Clef BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 4 ri ,�. R�w �l .. - ATTEST: 'a �' 4&- Dr. Dan W. White, -Joe Superintendent of Schools r— Co 00 o cr^, Approved as to form and c^� legal sufficiency as to Collier County -31C Ramiro Manalich— �` Chief Assistant County Attorney 1603 DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY By: P11 Anne Goodnioit, Chairman WIN DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 Lease # "77 3 LEASE AGREEMENT 16 E 2 THIS LEASE AGREEMENT entered into this �3=-Q day of CM , 2001, between SOLAR, a Florida Limited Corporation, whose mailing address is 4420 Mercantile Avenue, Naples, Florida 34104, hereinafter referred to as "LESSOR ", and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter referred as "LESSEE ". WITNESSETH In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, and other valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1. Demised Premises LESSOR hereby leases to LESSEE and LESSEE hereby leases from LESSOR the property described as Unit 101, 4420 Mercantile Avenue, Naples, Florida, comprising of approximately 1,200 square feet, hereinafter referred to as the "Demised Premises ", for the sole purpose of storage and sale of surplus property. LESSEE covenants and agrees not to use, occupy, suffer or permit said Demised Premises or any part thereof to be used or occupied for any purpose contrary to law or the rules or regulations of any public authority. ARTICLE 2. Term of Lease LESSEE shall have and hold the Demised Premises for a term of two (2) years commencing on November 1, 2001 and ending October 31, 2003. LESSEE is granted the option, provided it is not then in default of any of the terms of this Lease, to renew same for one (1) additional term of one (1) year, under the terms and conditions as provided herein, by giving written notice of LESSEE'S intention to do so to the LESSOR not less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the leasehold estate hereby created. Said notice shall become effective upon actual receipt by LESSOR. LESSEE, however, reserves the right to terminate this Lease, with or without cause, upon sixty (60) days prior written notice of such termination to LESSOR at the address set forth in ARTICLE 13 of this Lease. Said notice shall be effective upon actual receipt by LESSOR. ARTICLE 3. Rent LESSEE hereby covenants and agrees to pay as rent for the Demised Premises the sum of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and 00 /100 Cents ($7,500.00) per annum in equal monthly installments of Six Hundred Twenty -five Dollars and 00 /100 Cents ($625.00) each. All rental payments shall be due payable in advance on the first day of every calendar month during the term hereof. If the terms of this Lease shall commence on a day other than the first day of the month, LESSEE shall pay rental equal to one thirtieth (1 /30th) of the monthly rental multiplied by the number of rental days of such fractional month. LESSEE shall provide LESSOR, within thirty (30) days from the date of execution of this Lease by LESSEE, in addition to the monthly rental amount as stated above, an amount equal to one month's rent reflecting the last month's rent which shall be applied as rent to the last month that LESSEEE shall occupy the Demised Premises. If the last month's rent shall be paid by LESSEE for any reason, the LESSOR shall reimburse LESSEE for the prepaid rental amount. ARTICLE 4. Renewal Term Rent In the event LESSEE elects to renew this Lease, as provided for in ARTICLE 2, the rent set forth in ARTICLE 3 shall be increased as follows: For November 1, 2003 to October 31, 2004, the annual rent shall be Seven Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty -five Dollars ($7,725.00). ARTICLE 5. Other Expenses and Charges 16E 2 LESSEE shall pay all janitorial services pertaining to the Demised Premises, including, but not limited to, charges for electricity, light, air - conditioning and telephone or other communication service used, rendered or supplied thereupon or in connection with the Demised Premises. In addition to monthly rent, LESSEE shall be responsible for Common Area Maintenance charges ( "CAM ") to be paid monthly in the amount of One Hundred Fifty Dollars ($150.00). This amount shall include, but is not limited to, water use charges, sewer charges, real estate taxes, insurance, outside maintenance, common area lighting, landscaping and common area water and sewer charges pertaining to the Demised Premises. If LESSOR is required to increase CAM charges, LESSOR shall notify LESSEE by the last day of November of each year of occupancy, which shall reflect actual operating expenses related to the Demised Premises. LESSOR shall advise LESSEE, in writing, of the new charges for each year of the Lease and for any renewals thereto. Upon LESSOR'S notice to LESSEE concerning new charges, LESSOR shall provide LESSEE with detailed accounting of all CAM expenses. It is agreed by both parties that any increase in CAM shall reflect those actual costs for operating expenses and real estate taxes associated with the Demised Premises. LESSOR shall be responsible for all costs associated with the operation and maintenance of the electrical and lighting systems, plumbing system and at the Demised Premises. ARTICLE 6. Modifications to Demised Premises Prior to making any changes, alterations, additions or improvements to the Demised Premises, LESSEE will provide to LESSOR all proposals and plans for alterations, improvements, changes or additions to the Demised Premises for LESSOR'S prior written approval, specifying in writing the nature and extent of the desired alteration, improvement, change, or addition, along with the contemplated starting and completion time for such project. LESSOR or its designee will then have sixty (60) days within which to approve or deny in writing said request for changes, improvements, alterations or additions. LESSOR shall not unreasonably withhold its consent to required or appropriate alterations, improvements, changes or additions proposed by LESSEE. If after sixty (60) days there has been no written rejection delivered by LESSOR to LESSEE regarding said proposals or plans, then such silence shall be deemed as an APPROVAL to such request of LESSEE. LESSEE covenants and agrees in connection with any maintenance, repair work, erection, construction, improvement, addition or alteration of any authorized modifications, additions or improvements to the Demised Premises, to observe and comply with all then and future applicable laws, ordinances, rules, regulation, and requirements of the United States of America, State of Florida, County of Collier, and any and all governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Demised Premises. All alterations, improvements, and additions to said Demised Premises shall at once, when made or installed, be deemed as attached to the freehold and to have become property of LESSOR. Prior to the termination of this Lease or any renewal term thereof, or within thirty (30) days thereafter, if LESSOR so directs, LESSEE shall promptly remove all such additions, improvements, alterations, fixtures and installations which were placed in, on or upon the Demised Premises by or on behalf of LESSEE, and which are designated in said notice, and repair any damage occasioned to the Demised Premises by such removal and in default thereof, LESSOR may complete said removals and repairs at LESSEE'S expense. ARTICLE 7. Access to Demised Premises LESSOR, its duly authorized agents, representatives and employees, shall have the right after reasonable oral notice to LESSEE, to enter into and upon the Demised Premises or any part thereof at all reasonable hours for the purpose of examining same and making repairs or janitorial service therein, and for the purposes of inspection for compliance with provisions of this Lease Agreement. 2 ARTICLE 8. Assignment and Subletting 16E 2 LESSEE covenants and agrees not to assign this Lease or to sublet the whole or any part of the Demised Premises, or to permit any other persons, other than another County agency, to occupy same without the prior expressed written consent of LESSOR. Any such assignment or subletting, even with the consent of LESSOR, shall not relieve LESSEE from liability for payment of rent or other sums herein provided or from the obligation to keep and be bound by the terms, conditions and covenants of this Lease. The acceptance of rent from any other person shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any of the provisions of this Lease or to be a consent to the assignment of this Lease or subletting of the Demised Premises. ARTICLE 9. Indemnity and Insurance To the extent legally possible, the parties will continue the insurance arrangements in effect at the time of the commencement of this Lease, adjusted only so far as necessary to account for their change in legal position vis -a -vis. ARTICLE 10. Maintenance LESSEE shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep the Demised Premises clean at all times. If said Demised Premises are not kept clean in the opinion of LESSOR, LESSEE will be so advised in writing. If corrective action is not taken within thirty (30) days of the receipt of such notice, LESSOR will cause the same to be cleaned and corrected and LESSEE shall assume and pay all necessary cleaning costs and such costs shall constitute additional rent which shall be paid by LESSEE within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice of costs incurred by LESSOR. ARTICLE 11. Default by LESSEE Failure of LESSEE to comply with any provision or covenant of this Lease shall constitute a default and LESSOR may, at LESSOR'S option, terminate this Lease after thirty (30) days written notice to LESSEE, unless the default be cured within that notice period (or such additional time as is reasonably required to correct such default). ARTICLE 12. Default by LESSOR LESSOR shall in no event be charged with default in the performance of any of its obligations hereunder unless and until LESSOR shall have failed to perform such obligations within ninety (90) days (or such additional time as is reasonably required to correct such default) after written notice from LESSEE to LESSOR properly specifying wherein LESSOR has failed to perform any such obligations. ARTICLE 13. Notices Any notice which LESSOR or LESSEE may be required to give to the other party shall be in writing to the other party at the following addresses: LESSEE: Board of County Commissioners c/o Real Property Management Department 3301 Tamiami Trail East Administration Building Naples, Florida 34112 cc: Office of the County Attorney Purchasing Director ARTICLE 15. Surrender of Premises LESSOR: Solar, LC 4420 Mercantile Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 Attn: Property Manager LESSEE covenants and agrees to deliver up and surrender to LESSOR possession of the Demised Premises upon expiration of this Lease, or its earlier termination, broom clean and in as good condition and repair as the same shall be at the commencement of the term of this Lease or may have been put by LESSOR or LESSEE during the continuance thereof, ordinary wear and tear and damage by fire or the elements beyond LESSEE'S control excepted. 3 ARTICLE 16. General Provisions 16E 2 LESSEE fully understands that the police and law enforcement security protection provided by law enforcement agencies to the Demised Premises is limited to that provided to any other business or agency situated in Collier County, and LESSEE acknowledges that any special security measures deemed necessary for additional protection of the Demised Premises shall be the sole responsibility and cost of LESSEE and shall involve no cost or expense to LESSOR. LESSEE expressly agrees for itself, its successor and assigns, to refrain from any use of the Demised Premises which would interfere with or adversely affect the operation or maintenance of LESSOR'S standard operations. ARTICLE 17. Radon Gas In compliance with Section 404.056, Florida Statutes, all parties are hereby made aware of the following: Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that, when it has accumulated in a building in sufficient quantities, may present health risks to persons who are exposed to it over time. Levels of radon that exceed federal and state guidelines have been found in buildings in Florida. Additional information regarding radon and radon testing may be obtained from your County Public Health Department. ARTICLE 18. Effective Date This Lease Agreement shall become effective upon execution by both LESSOR and LESSEE. ARTICLE 19. Governing Law This Lease Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunder set forth their hands and seals. AS TO THE LESSEE: DATED: - ( Oa ATJ�T:� II�I'yS 'K, Clerk BY, At,t"t% uiy Clerk AST '3 $OR: DATED: O ;L 3 O/ ATTEST: . 2�4-a--e& WIT SS (signature) 4. 13 _ % IS V r- print name WITNESS (signature) print name Approved as to fo a d legal sufficiency: �1 Thom s C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: 49u� JAMES CARTER, Ph. D., Chairman o /X,7 /0 / SOLAR,L BY: J nne C. Durham, Secretary /Treasurer 4 (CORPORATE SEAL) 16E3 J MEMORANDUM Date: October 25, 2001 To: Michael Dowling, Real Property Specialist Real Property Management Department From: Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: First Amendment To Standard Agreement For Central Office Space Lease And License Between Collier County And Sprint - Florida, Inc. Enclosed please find one (1) original document as referenced above (Agenda Item #16E3), as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 23, 2001. Please forward to Sprint - Florida, Inc., for the required signatures, and kindly return the fully executed original to Minutes and Records. If you should have any questions, please call me at 774 -8411. Thank you. Enclosure 16E3 First Amendment to Standard Agreement for Central Office Space Lease and License WHEREAS, Collier County, ( "Customer ") and Sprint- Florida, Incorporated, ( "Company "), entered into a Standard Agreement for Central Office Space Lease and Agreement providing for Central Office Space at Company's property located at the Pinecrest Tower, Monroe County, Florida, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Agreement "), the parties now subsequently wish to amend certain terms of the Agreement. WHEREAS, Schedule 1 to Article 14 of the Agreement provides for an Agreement term of three (3) years, and month -to -month thereafter, the original term of which ends May 1, 2000; and, WHEREAS, Schedule 1 to Article 14 "Contract Price" of the Agreement provides for a monthly compensation of $570 paid by Customer to Company each month. NOW, THEREFORE, Customer and Company, in consideration of the mutual advantage to both parties, resolve, that the Agreement be amended as follows, effective retroactively to September 15, 2001: Schedule 1 to Article 14 shall be replaced by the following; "The term of this Agreement shall be for five (5) years commencing May 2, 2001. The term of this Agreement will be automatically renewed for four (4) additional consecutive terms of five (5) years each, unless Customer or Company provide d the other party with written notice of intention not to renew not less than nine (9) moths prior to the expiration of any such term. Such termination may be made for any reason by either party, but Company may not terminate solely to change the "Rental Rate" or "Lease Charge." In the event that Company wishes to sell the leased premises or requires the leased premises for its own use, this lease shall be terminable with ninety (90) days advance written notice to Customer." Schedule 1 to Article 14 "Contract Price" shall be replaced by the following: "Rental for the tower lease will be $627 per month commencing as of September 15, 2001. If Customer shall fail to pay within ten (10) days of when the same is due and payable, any Charge or any other amount or charges to be paid by Customer hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear interest from the due date thereof to the date of the payment at the rate of one percent (I%) simple interest per month.. The monthly Rental Charge will be increased annually on the anniversary date of the Amendment by an amount equal to five percent (5%) of the monthly Rent for the previous year. For example, the monthly rent that begins on September 15, 2002, will increase to $658.35." It is further agreed that the Agreement with all of its terms and provisions, including as hereby amended, shall continue in full force and effect and be binding on the parties hereto. IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these present to be duly executed this Q31S.0- day of no 7—n 8 E R , 2001. DATED: 0 A I Attast as to Chairman's ATTEST: siipau " 961j. DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BY: In 0 -&, . C - Deputy Clerk CUSTOMER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR A BY: JAMES ARTER, Ph. D., Chairman WITNESSES: Si ature / /V�// S /C�� < <��� (Print name) lf� cC.N,t n n.� is A3 w� Signa e (Print n e) Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: �.. 5�--- Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney 16E3 COMPANY: SPRINT //— FLORIDA, I722f�� BY: (�i.Zi2 %y''"P _ L.S. William E. Cheek Title - President Wholesale Markets 1OF2 a MEMORANDUM Date: October 25, 2001 To: Tom Storrar, Administrator Emergency Services From: Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Memorandum Of Understanding G5120010007 Between The National Park Service and Ochopee Fire District Enclosed please find one (1) original document as referenced above, Agenda Item #16F2, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 23, 2001. Kindly forward the document to the appropriate parties for required signatures and return one fully executed original to Minutes and Records. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774- 8411. Thank you. Enclosure 16F2 I Memorandum To: Minutes & Records From: Darcy Waldron, Executive Secret Emergency Services Division Date: December 17, 2001 Subject: MOU — National Park Service / Big Cypress Preserve & Ochopee Fire Control District Board Approval 10/23/01 Item: 16.F.2 Attached is the original copy of the above agreement signed by all parties. Please record as an official record. Three certified copies have been requested by the National Park Service, Big Cypress National Preserve for their records. Please send the Certified Copies to me and I will then forward to the Big Cypress National Preserve. Should you have any questions, please call me at 732 -2567. Thank you for your assistance. Emergency Services Division 16F2 M)EMORADUM OF UNDERSTANDING G5120010007 Between UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL PRESERVE HCR 61 BOX 110 OCHOPPE, FLORIDA 34141 and OCHOPEE FIRE DISTRICT ARTICLE I — RACKGRQUND AND OBJECTIVES This agreement is entered into by and between the National Park Service (hereinafter "NPS "), United States Department of the Interior, acting through the Superintendent of Big Cypress National Preserve (hereinafter "Preserve ") and the Ochopee Fire District, represented by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (hereinafter " Ochopee Fire District "). The purpose of this agreement is to establish the terms and conditions under which both parties will provide mutual assistance in preventing, detecting, and suppressing structural fires, within the Ochopee Fire District, the Preserve, and in the immediate surrounding area. Currently, the Ochopee Fire District is empowered by Collier County, State of Florida, to provide structural fire protection within and outside the Preserve, to provide wildland fire protection on state and private lands outside the preserve and to assist other state and federal agencies in wildland fire protection within and outside the preserve. Congress further established the Preserve that the area within the boundaries depicted on the map (in Appendix A) shall be known as the Big Cypress National Preserve. Such lands shall be administered by the Secretary as a unit of the National Park System in a manner which will assure their natural and ecological integrity in perpetuity in accordance with the provisions ofthis Act and with the provisions of the Act of August 25, 1916 (39 Stat. 535; 16 U.S.C. 1 -4), as amended and supplemented. ARTICLE II — AUTHORITY This agreement is entered into under the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 1856a (1994). ARTICLE III - STATEMENT OF WORK A. The Preserve shall report promptly to Ochopee Fire District all structural fires originating within the Preserve and wildland fires on properties adjoining the Preserve or which threaten structures or roadside improvements. B. The Preserve shall take initial attack on those wildfires occurring outside the Preserve on Ochopee Fire District protected lands within approximately 1 mile of it's boundary without awaiting a request to do so if the fire threatens or may threaten Preserve lands. C. The Preserve shall provide fire weather data generated from the Service's AFFIRMS and remote weather stations (RAWS) to Ochopee Fire District upon request. D. The Preserve shall provide assistance on structural fires within the Preserve to include exterior exposure protection, water relay, emergency medical assistance and traffic control (to the extent of certified skill and training Ievel of the Preserve's staff. 16f2 'I E. Ochopee Fire District shall report, to the Preserve, all wildland fires within or threatening the Preserve that are observed by or reported to Ochopee Fire District personnel. F. Ochopee Fire District shall take initial attack, or reinforce Preserve staff at, wildland fires, resulting from structural or vehicular fires, to which they have responded within the Preserve (after completing their primary structural responsibility). G. The parties further agree as follows: 1. To meet jointly at least once annually before September 30 to review and update this Memorandum of Understanding as needed and to provide for other meetings as deemed necessary for discussions of matters relating to the management of fire on lands within and adjacent to the Preserve. 2. Each party shall provide to the other party a list of responsible persons, with telephone numbers, to be contacted in an emergency. At least once a year, or more often if necessary, each party shall provide the other party with an updated list of such persons and telephone numbers. 3. Each party shall provide to the other party copies of current fire management plans for their areas of primary responsibility, including maps of areas involved and descriptions of special or extraordinary actions taken. 4. Only Minimum Impact Suppression Tactics shall be used when fighting fires within the Park. No chainsaws or ground- disturbing equipment such as graders or bulldozers shall be used without the permission of the Preserve's Superintendent or his/her designee. 5. After notifying the other party of a fire's discovery, ether party may take immediate action to suppress a fire in the other party's area of primary responsibility in order to save life or property. A Each party to this agreement waives all claims against the other party for compensation for any loss, damage, personal injury, or death occurring in consequence of the performance of this agreement. /7. Neither party to this agreement shall reimburse the other party for all or any part of the cost incurred by such in providing fire protection pursuant to this agreement. 8. Nothing in this agreement shall be construed as obligating the Preserve to expend in any one fiscal year any sum in excess of the monies appropriated by Congress and allocated by the National Park Service for the performance of this agreement. 9. To designate a person in each agency to coordinate fire management activities and meetings between agencies. 10. Each party shall provide the other party fire reports of fire suppressed on the other party's lands. 11. Each party shall assist each other in investigating the origin and cause of fires and in providing resulting reports as requested for use in prosecuting arson suspects. 12. Each party shall comply with each agency's fire management policies (as attached in Appendix "B ") when suppressing fires within the other agency's lands. /13. When initial attack and/or reinforced attack mutual aid is given, each agency will bear the cost of it's own suppression efforts with no monetary reimbursement required. Such requests will be honored based upon criteria in Appendix C for dispatch of fire forces and the status of fire conditions within the receiving agency's land. Assistance rendered herein is limited to the first 24 -hour period. 14. Each party shall notify each other of fire training being conducted and to share such training sessions with each 16F2 other on a space available basis. 15. Each party shall develop compatible radio communications systems for the purpose of joint fire prevention and suppression. Each agency agrees to allow the other use of those frequencies identified for communication of fire activity. Each agency agrees to abide by radio procedures established by the other during such communications. Each agency shall maintain it's own radio system. ARTICLE IV — TERM OF AGREEMENT This agreement shall be effective for a period of five years from the date of final signature, unless it is terminated earlier by one of the parties pursuant to Article VIII that follows: ARTICLE V — KEY OFFICIALS A. For the NPS: Larry Belles, Chief of fire and Aviation Big Cypress National Preserve HCR 61 Box 110 Ochopee, FL 34141 (941) 695 -1145 B. Ochopee Fire District Paul Wilson, Fire Chief Ochopee, FL (941) 695- ARTICLE VI — PRIOR APPROVAL Not applicable ARTICLE VII — REPORT AND /OR OTHER DELIVERABLES Upon request and to the fo11 extent permitted by applicable law, the parties shall share with each other final reports of incidents involving both parties. ARTICLE VIII — PRPERTY UTILIZATION Unless otherwise agree to in writing by both parties, any property furnished by one party to the other shall remain the property of the fin-nishing party. Any property furnished by the NPS to the Ochopee Fire District during the performance of this agreement shall be used and disposed of as set forth in the NPS Property Management Regulations. ARTICLE IX — MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION A. This agreement may be modified only by a written instrument executed by the parties. B. Either party may terminate this agreement by providing the other party with sixty (60) days advance written notice. In the event that one party provides the other party with notice of its intention to terminate, the parties shall meet promptly to discuss the reasons for the notice and to try to resolve their differences amicable. The parties commit to using every reasonable means available, including the use of a neutral mediator if necessary, to try to avoid terminating this agreement. 16F2 ARTICLE X — STANDARD CLAUSES A. Civil Rights During the performance of this agreement, the participants agree to abide by the terms of the USDI -Civil Rights Assurance Certification, non - discrimination, and will not discriminate against any person because of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. The participants will take affirmative action to unsure that applicants are employed without regard to their race, color, religion, national origin, disabilities, age or sex. B. Promotions The Ochopee Fire District shall not publicize or otherwise circulate promotional material (such as advertisements, sales brochures, press releases, speeches, still and motion pictures, articles, manuscripts or other publications) which states or implies Governmental, Departmental, bureau or Government employee endorsement of a product, service, or position which the (party) represents. No release of information relating to this agreement may state or imply that Government approves of the Ochopee Fire District's work product to be superior to other products or services. C. Public Information Release The Ochopee Fire District must obtain prior Government approval form the Superintendent ofbig Cypress National Preserve for any public information release which refers to the Department of the Interior, any bureau, park unit, or employee (by name or title), or to this agreement. The specific text, layout, photographs, etc. of the proposed release must be submitted with the request for approval. D. Liability Provision Each party to this agreement will indemnify, save and hold harmless, and defend each other against all fines, claims, damages, losses, judgments, and expenses arising out of, or from, any omission or activity of such person organization, its representatives, or employees. 16F2 ARTICLE XL — SIGNATURES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement on the date(s) set forth below. FOR THE NAT A ARKS RVICE: Signature. _ Name: John Dona e Title: Supe tendent Big C r ss National Pre e Signature: Name: Randy Effert Title: Contracting O er Big Cypress National Preserve Date: 11l O Date: FOR COLLIER C TY, FLO ,..„aertrr Signature: Date: a3 Name: Jamles Title: ChAirrYiaii 'ol4ier, C -u tj Board of Commissioners ATTEST; D eight E.,Brock, Qgrk Attest is to Chairman's sig"Atrre only. BY: D`':Lt:. rIYJ FOR O OPE F CON OL DISTRICT: Signature: Date: Name: Paul Wilson Title: Chief, Ochopee Fire Control District Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Nam Se►1n v peot/0 Title: Assistant County Attorney Date MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING REVIEW SEQUENCE 16F2 The undersigned have reviewed this MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING for pertinence and have initiated actions for revisions, as appropriate, to the respective responsible authorities. BIG CYPRESS NATIONAL PRESERVE OCHOPEE FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT (Fire Management Officer) (Fire Chief) 2002 Date 2003 Date Date 2005 Date Date Date Date Date 16F2 APPENDIX B FIRE MANAGEMENT POLICIES FOR THE PRESERVE 1. All wildland fires will be effectively managed, considering resource values to be protected in and firefighter and public safety, using the full range of strategic and tactical options a described the fire management plan. 2. An active fire prevention program will be conducted in conjunction with other agencies to protect human life, prevent modification to preserve ecosystems by human - caused wildfire, and prevent damage to cultural resources or physical facilities. 3. The fire suppression methods used in the preserve should be those causing the least resource damage, commensurate with effective control. (No tractors, plows or retardant chemicals to be used without consent of the line officer of the Preserve) 4. Memorandum of Understanding will be developed to facilitate reciprocal fire management activities for land within and adjacent to the parks. 16f2 APPENDIX C CRITERIA FOR RENDERING ASSISTANCE The rendering of emergency assistance in extinguishing fires and in preserving life and property from fires will be subject to the following conditions. 1. The assistance will be limited to that which can be given without jeopardizing the protection of the assisting agency's property, and to such assistance as is determined by the authorizing official to be in the best interests of the assisting agency. 2. The assistance will be limited to the use of those facilities locally available and to those persons employed by the assisting agency (preferably trained in firefighting) at the time of the emergency. There is no authority for the hiring of additional personnel or for making procurements of services or materials for the purpose of fighting fire not endangering assisting agency's property or human lives. 3. The assistance will be limited to properties within a reasonable geographic distance from assisting agency's property at which fire protection facilities are maintained or within reasonable distance therefrom. It is assumed that under normal circumstances a call for assistance which requires more than an hour's travel time to reach would be considered unreasonable. 4. The assistance will, if possible, be performed without the expense of overtime payment. However, in those cases where it is not possible to adhere to this policy, necessary overtime may be paid if otherwise properly ordered. 16F 4 RESOLUTION NO. 01 - 410 RESOLUTION APPROVING USER FEES FOR COLLIER COUNTY AMBULANCE SERVICES PURSUANT TO COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 96 - 36; ADOPTING BILLING AND COLLECTION PROCEDURE; PROVIDING ADJUSTMENTS AND WAIVERS; AND APPROVING HARDSHIP CASES AND PAYMENT PLANS WHEREAS, Collier County Emergency Medical Services (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "EMS ") provides ambulance services to the residents and visitors of Collier County; and WHEREAS, the Collier County EMS operating budget is funded exclusively through ad valorem taxes and user fees; and WHEREAS, Collier County staff analysis of the cost for ambulance services requires an adjustment to the user fees to properly identify current costs of services to the residents and visitors of Collier County; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance 96 - 36 provides that the user fees for ambulance services may be established by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "the Board "). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT: SECTION ONE: EMS USER FEES BASE RATES SERVICE LEVELS A. EMS - BLS NON - EMERGENCY TRANSPORT B. EMS - BLS EMERGENCY TRANSPORT C. EMS — ALS 1 NON - EMERGENCY TRANSPORT D. EMS - ALS 1 EMERGENCY TRANSPORT E. EMS — ALS 2 EMERGENCY TRANSPORT F. EMS — SPECIALTY CARE TRANSPORT G. EMS - HELICOPTER TRANSPORT BASE CHARGE $ 300.00 $ 325.00 $ 350.00 $ 375.00 $ 400.00 $ 450.00 $ 500.00 E MILEAGE RATES 6F4 SERVICE LEVELS MILEAGE CHARGE A. EMS — IN COUNTY GROUND UNIT TRANSPORT $ 7.00 (MINIMUM OF 1 MILE - CAP OF 10 MILES) service dynamics B. EMS - OUT OF COUNTY GROUND UNIT TRANSPORT $ 7.00 (MINIMUM OF 1 MILE WITH NO CAP) time C. EMS - IN COUNTY AIR UNIT TRANSPORT $ 10.00 (MINIMUM OF 1 MILE — CAP OF 10 MILES) D. EMS - OUT OF COUNTY AIR UNIT TRANSPORT $ 10.00 (MINIMUM OF 1 MILE WITH NO CAP) SPECIAL EVENTS AND MISCELANEOUS RATES SERVICE LEVELS RATES - TWO (2) MEDICS /ONE ALS VEHICLE (PER HOUR) $ 150.00 - ONE (1) MEDIC /NO VEHICLE (PER HOUR) $ 50.00 COPIES OF DOCUMENTS /PER PAGE $ 1.00 (EXCLUDING GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES) INTEREST ON PAST DUE ACCOUNTS 1% SECTION TWO: BILLING AND COLLECTION PROCEDURE The following shall be the minimum guidelines for billing and collection procedures for ambulance service fees and charges: A. Initial fees and charges for ambulance service(s) shall be assessed either prior to or following the service provision, as service dynamics reasonably permit. Unpaid fees and charges, subsequent to time of service, shall be reflected in an accounts receivable subsidiary ledger system to be maintained by the EMS Department. B. An initial bill for ambulance services shall be processed in the following manner within thirty (30) days after service is provided. 2 16F4 1, The County will send an initial bill to the service recipient's or responsible party's insurance carrier provided that appropriate insurance information is made available to the EMS Billing Section. The EMS Billing Section will accept Medicare assignment, as a participating provider, and will wait no less than 45 days for payment if Medicare or other insurance carrier's are billed. If the claim is denied, a bill will be sent to the service recipient or responsible party. 2. The County will also send a bill to Medicaid and accept assignment if appropriate insurance information is made available to the EMS Billing Section by the service recipient or responsible party. The EMS Billing Section will wait no less than 60 days for payment if Medicaid is billed. If the claim is denied because of no coverage at time of service, a bill will sent to the service recipient or responsible party. If Medicaid denies because they felt it was not medically necessary to be transported by ambulance, then the account will be adjusted off per the rules and regulations of Medicaid. 3. In the event the service recipient or responsible party does not have or does not provide proof of insurance coverage, the bill for ambulance service(s) shall be sent directly to the service recipient or responsible party for payment. The EMS Billing Section will wait no less than 30 days for payment. The following will occur if payment has not been received within above set guidelines: 1. A past due notice will be sent in accordance with the above provisions (45 days after billing third party or Medicare, 60 days after billing Medicaid and 30 days after billing responsible party or service recipient). IQ 16F4 2. Thirty (30) days) after the first past due notice is sent, a second past due notice will be sent. 3. After a ten (10) day grace period, the account will be sent to the County's contracted collection agency. C. Interest will be assessed at 1% per month on all accounts that are sent to the County's contracted collection agency. (excluding hardships that adhere to County policy). D. A reasonable and customary payment plan will be made available for all service recipients or responsible parties. Should the service recipient or responsible party at any time fail to meet the terms and conditions of the payment plan, the unpaid balance shall be administered in accordance with Section B.3 above. E. When ambulance service bill(s), at any stage in this billing and collection procedure, are returned because the Postal Service cannot effectuate delivery, the EMS Billing Section shall make a reasonable effort to ascertain the correct mailing address. If reasonable efforts to ascertain a correct address fail, the account(s) may be considered for other collection alternatives. F. Nothing contained in this section shall preclude reasonable telephone or other appropriate contact for billing and collection purposes, in accordance with all applicable laws. G. Throughout the fiscal year, the EMS Billing Section shall review all past due accounts and report to the Board of County Commissioners on an annual basis, of all past due accounts which are believed to be uncollectible. The Board shall, after reviewing these past due accounts and after finding that diligent efforts at collection have proven unsuccessful, remove these past due accounts from active accounts receivable in accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures and pursuant to law by Resolution. 4 16F4 SECTION THREE: ADJUSTMENT OF EMS USER FEES The following shall be minimum guidelines for adjustments to ambulance service fees. The Board of County Commissioners in accordance with criteria established by the enabling Ordinance may authorize other adjustments. A. Medicare and Medicaid Adjustments Contractual adjustments under Medicare and /or Medicaid assignment will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. B. Victim's Compensation Contractual Adjustments Contractual adjustments will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. C. Worker's Compensation Contractual Adjustments Contractual adjustments will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. D. County Employee Adjustments Board of County Commissioners and Constitutional Officers' employees that have Primary coverage under Collier County's insurance policy will receive an adjustment in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of Ordinance 96 -36. E. Champus/Tricare Adjustments Contractual adjustments will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. F. Railroad Retirement Adjustments Contractual adjustments will be made in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. G. Social Services Adjustments Contractual adjustments will be made in accordance with rules established by the County Manager and memorialized by a memorandum of understanding executed by the Social Services Director and the EMS Operations Director. 6-1 16F4 SECTION FOUR: WAIVER OF EMS USER FEE Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96 - 36, and from the effective date of this Resolution, user fees for EMS ambulance stand -by services for the following community special events shall be waived as the Board finds that a valid public purpose is hereby established in recognition of their charitable contributions to the Community: (1) Collier County Fair; (2) Everglades Seafood Festival; (3) Collier County Public High School varsity football games. Fees for other community special events may be waived in accordance with criteria established by the enabling Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: HARDSHIP CASES AND PAYMENT PLANS The Board recognizes that certain service recipients may need to be identified and processed as hardship cases. Payment plans will be established pursuant to the minimum guidelines set forth in this Resolution. A. Hardship cases will be established in accordance with the Federal Poverty guidelines, as used by the Social Services Department of Collier County. B. Payment plans for hardship cases will be set up on a monthly basis, with a minimum payment of $10.00 per month. Hardship cases, placed on a payment plan will not accrue interest or be placed into collection. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a service recipient has a payment plan and does not make the agreed scheduled payments for a period longer than two (2) months, the account will be turned over to the County's contracted collection agency and interest will begin to accrue. SECTION SIX: SUPERSESSION OF RESOLUTION 2000 -167 This Resolution shall supersede Resolution No. 2000 -167 SECTION SEVEN: ADOPTION AND EFFECTIVE DATE This Resolution shall become effective on October 1, 2001. M 16F4 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ' I P dav , of QM 2 2001. ATT-ff % DWfi§HT- E_B!:toC ,;CLERK rem Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: I qu line Hubbard Robinson sistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COM ISSIONERS OF COLLIE UNTY, F BY: James arter, OEM., an 7 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE FOR BOARD ACTION: 16J1 1. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: A. Clerk of Courts: Submitted for public record, pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1), the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period: 1. September 19, 2001 -through September 25, 2001. 2. September 26, 2001- through October 2, 2001. B. Districts: 1. Collier Soil and Water Conservation District - Agenda for September 19, 2001, Minutes of August 15, 2001. C. Minutes, 1. Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee - Agenda for September 27, 2001, Minutes of August 9, 2001, a) Pelican Bay Budget Hearing - Agenda for September 12, 2001 b) Clam Bay Sub - Committee - Agenda for September 12, 2001, Minutes for July 19, 2001. C) Organization Structure Review Sub - Committee - Agenda of September 27, 2001, Minutes of August 29, 2001 2. Collier County Planning Commission - Agenda for Friday September 7, 2001, Agenda for September 20, 2001, Agenda for September 19, 2001, Minutes of August 16, 2001. 3. Rural Fringe Assessment Area Oversight Committee - Agenda for September 12, 2001, Minutes of August 29, 2001, Agenda for September 26, 2001, Minutes of September 12, 2001, Minutes for August 8, 2001, Minutes of August 29, 2001. AGI 1 A f� No. OCT 2 3 2001 H:Data/Format I p9. 1 16J1 4. Immokalee Beautification Advisory Committee - Minutes of August 15, 2001. Historic & Archaeological Preservation Board - Agenda for September 21, 2001, Minutes of August 17, 2001 6. Collier County Contractors Licensing Board - Agenda for September 19, 2001. 7. Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee - Agenda for October 12, 2001, Minutes of August 10, 2001. 8. Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee Minutes for August 17, 2001 9. Enterprise Zone Development Agency - Draft Minutes of September 20, 2001. 10. Collier County Productivity Meeting - Agenda for September 19, 2001, Minutes of August 15, 2001. 11. Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization - Agenda for September 28, 2001. 12. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee - Agenda for May 29, 2001; Agenda for June 7, 2001; Agenda for June 27, 2001; and Agenda for August 2, 2001, Minutes of May 29, 2001, Minutes of June 7, 2001, Minutes of June 27, 2001 and Minutes for August 2, 2001. 13. Bayshore Beautification Advisory Committee - Minutes of September 5, 2001. 14. Collier County Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board - Agenda for September 27, 2001. 15. Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council - Agenda for September 26, 2001, Minutes for August 29, 2001. 16. Environmental Advisory Council - Agenda for October 3, 2001, Minutes of August 7, 2001., Minutes of September 5, 2001 17. 1 -75 /Golden Gate Interchange Advisory Committee - Minutes for August 30, 2001. 18. Rural Lands Area Assessment Area Oversight - Agenda for Septembe. 17, 2001, Minutes of August 20, 2001. A��N - ITEM No.n,.� -a OCT 23 2001 H:Data/Format P9. -- 16J1 Other: 1) Letter from Guy L. Carlton, Collier County Tax Collector — Tax Collector's Recapitulation of the 2000 Tax Roll for Collier County, Florida. AG -T No. OCT 2 3 2001 Pg. H:Data/Format 16J1 Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County, Florida Finance & Accounting Department MEMORANDUM Date: 09/25/01 To: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners From: Constance C. Murray, General Operations Manager Finance Department /Clerk to the Board Re: Board of County Commissioners Disbursements Please find attached a listing of the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period September 19, 2001 through September 25, 2001. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1) I request that these reports be included as miscellaneous correspondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made part of the official records. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please telephone me at 774- 8481. Misc. Corres: Date:. Item# ( U 1 Copies To: 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558206 VENDOR 111990 . 3M 10041042 TP50080 101- 163630 - 653710 -00000 0.00 42.12 0.00 107006 - TRANSFER TAPE, 8/29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558558 VENDOR 281900 A SOUND CHOICE ENTERTAINMENT 10039710 09/28/01 TEEN DANCE 111 - 156395 - 634999 -00000 0.00 325.00 0.00 107075 DJ FOR DANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558348 VENDOR 174220 A T & T EASYLINK SERVICES 10040337 M1610800109 118 - 144210. 641210 -33791 0.00 362.14 0.00 100986 AT &T FAX SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558051 VENDOR 80 A. GAIL BOORMAN & ASSOCIATES 10042005 11100 368 - 116360. 631500 -00165 0.00 50.51 0.00 3764 THRU 8/28/01 10042005 11100 368 - 116360.763100 -00165 0.00 850.00 0.00 3764 THRU 8/28/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558310 VENDOR 161100 AAA GENERATOR & PUMP INC. 10039741 GO1.0906 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.001.85 0.00 100269 GEN REPAIR 10041635 GO1 -0825 001. 122240 - 634999.00000 0.00 1,540.62 0.00 104185 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 GO1 -0848 408 - 233351. 634999 -00000 0.00 274.72 0.00 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 GO1 -0828 408.233351- 634999 -00000 0.00 277.19 0.00 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10040928 GO1 -0932 001.122240- 634999 -00000 0.00 180.20 0.00 104185 GENERATOR REPAIR 10039741 GO1 -0907 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 660.87 0.00 100269 GEN REPAIR SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 2 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041635 GO1 -0950 001. 122240- 634999 -00000 0.00 223.62 0.00 223.62 104185 GENERATOR REPAIR 10039709 GO1 -0908 001 - 122240- 634999.00000 0.00 379.68 0.00 379.68 104185 GEN REPAIR 10040928 GO1 -0929 001- 122240 - 634999.00000 0.00 218.20 0.00 218.20 104185 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 GO1 -0830 408 - 233351 - 634999.00000 0.00 299.10 0.00 299.10 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 GO1 -0836 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 407.07 0.00 407.07 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 GO1 -0842 408- 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 392.14 0.00 392.14 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 GO1 -0847 408 - 233351. 634999 -00000 0.00 278.02 0.00 278.02 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10040928 GO1 -0931 001. 122240. 634999 -00000 0.00 153.46 0.00 153.46 104185 GENERATOR REPAIR 10041947 GO1 -0955 408- 253211. 634999 -00000 0.00 630.95 0.00 630.95 100990 SERVICE AND REPAIR 10042067 GO1.0829 408- 233351. 634999 -00000 0.00 375.85 0.00 375.85 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10040928 GO1 -0927 001 - 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 108.00 0.00 108.00 104185 GENERATOR REPAIR 10040928 GO1.0903 001. 122240- 634999 -00000 0.00 114.00 0.00 114.00 104185 GENERATOR REPAIR 10041635 GO1 -0962 001. 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 239.52 0.00 239.52 104185 GENERATOR REPAIR 10041947 GO1 -0954 408. 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 556.69 0.00 556.69 100990 SERVICE AND REPAIR 10042067 GO1 -0845 408. 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 661.51 0.00 661.51 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10039708 GO1 -0920 408 - 233351 - 634999.00000 0.00 93.42 0.00 93.42 100893 GEN REPAIR 10042067 GO1 -0844 408- 233351. 634999 -00000 0.00 277.19 0.00 277.19 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042067 G01 -0851 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 G01 -0827 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 G01 -0834 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042061 G01 -0924 100526 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 G01 -0843 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 GO1 -0835 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR 10042067 G01 -0853 100893 GENERATOR REPAIR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VCHR DISC SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 634999.00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 408- 233312. 634999 -00000 0.00 408. 233351- 634999 -00000 0.00 408. 233351- 634999 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558455 VENDOR 237370 - ABB WATER METERS INC. 10041634 174478 408. 210151 - 652910 -00000 0.00 105846 HAND HELD RADIO CHECK NO 558579 VENDOR 288960 - ABLE BODY TEMPORARY SERVICE 10041980 115005518 109 - 182602- 634999 -00000 0.00 109 - 182901. 634999 -00000 0.00 100151 TEMPERARY LABOR CHECK NO 558053 VENDOR 120 - ACCENT BUSINESS PRODUCTS 10041933 088859 130 - 157710 - 651110 -00000 0.00 STAPLE CARTRIDHES FOR COPIER CHECK NO 558052 VENDOR 110 - ACTION AUTOMATIC DOOR CO 10039704 162311 001. 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 57903 SERVICE CALL 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 374.89 0.00 386.41 0.00 315.16 0.00 87.50 0.00 253.95 0.00 288.72 0.00 380.82 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4.861.77 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 3 VCHR NET 374.89 386.41 315.16 87.50 253.95 288.72 380.82 11,431.32 4.861.77 4,861.77 1,392.81 3,409.97 0.00 4,802.78 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,802.78 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 91.00 0.00 91.00 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10039704 161299 001.122240- 634999 -00000 0.00 119.95 0.00 57903 SERVICE CALL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558420 VENDOR 213950 ADAM'S MARK 10041185 0041823501 P KRALEY 001 - 155230 - 640300 -00000 0.00 658.00 0.00 107393 P KRALEY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558649 VENDOR 321100 ADAM'S MARK DENVER 10038295 32332VKTO L. OCHS 10 /1 001 - 155110- 640300 -00000 0.00 596.00 0.00 107000 L. OCHS 10/1 -5 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558716 VENDOR 335370 - ADMIN FOR CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 10041862 PP #26 001 - 000000- 218810 -00000 0.00 97.50 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558342 VENDOR 170610 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSOCIATES 10041934 000407814 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 369.40 0.00 058242 CAMP SUPPLIES 10041934 00410791 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 26.05 0.00 058242 CAMP SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558561 VENDOR 282670 ADVANCED AIR & REFRIGERATION, INC. 10041633 1448 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 1,369.26 0.00 104528 A/C AND HEATING REPAIR 10041638 1435 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 162.50 0.00 COMMERCIAL LABOR EVERGLADES CITY LIB 10041633 1437 001.122240. 652997 -00000 0.00 162.50 0.00 104528 A/C AND HEATING REPAIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558537 VENDOR 276040 - ADVANCED FIRE SYSTEMS, INC 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10040929 48962 001. 122240 - 634007 -00000 0.00 34.80 0.00 100003 MAINT OF EXTINGUISHERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558648 VENDOR 320830 AEC NATIONAL /WILKISON JOINT VENTURE 10041695 17526 413 - 263611 - 631400.74034 0.00 2,902.00 0.00 7092 - THRU 8/26/01 10041694 17492 413 - 263611. 631400 -74036 0.00 3,394.53 0.00 102276 - THRU 8/26/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558701 VENDOR 332080 AERC. COM, INC. 10040925 43593 001. 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 170.00 0.00 LAMPS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558375 VENDOR 189000 AERIAL CARTOGRAPHICS OF AMERICA INC 10041023 83668 320 - 183800 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 105055 AERIAL PHOTOS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558741 VENDOR 339910 AERO PRODUCTS CORPORATION 10041936 71617 111 - 156313. 652720 -00000 0.00 286.68 0.00 STA -BLOCK HEAD IMMOBILIZER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558179 VENDOR 103780 - AFFORDABLE FRAMING & FINE ART 10041639 09/14/01 472. 173422 - 649990 -00000 0.00 102.00 0.00 FRAMING OF WEBSITE AWARD ON RECYCLIN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558550 VENDOR 280150 - AFLAC 10041851 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 217800 -00000 0.00 1,171.25 001 - 000000- 217850 -00000 0.00 966.46 001 - 000000 - 217310 -00000 0.00 248.86 0.00 PP #26 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558054 VENDOR 300 - AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. 10041692 R10380 331. 163650 - 631400 -62071 0.00 590.00 0.00 916790 - THRU 8/14/01 10041693 R10363 346. 116360- 763100 -80013 0.00 18.00 0.00 5820 - THRU 8/14/01 10042008 010392 320 - 183800 - 631400 -00000 0.00 693.75 0.00 106080 - SERVICES THRU 814/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558351 VENDOR 174550 AHMET GURSOY M.D. 10041739 R GORDON 99.988 681- 421190 - 634401.00000 0.00 275.00 0.00 R GORDON 99 -988 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558782 VENDOR 343720 ALFREDO DAVID LOPEZ 10041637 09/11/01 A, LOPEZ REFUND 408 - 253212. 649010 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 REIMBURSE EMPLOYEE FOR CLASS D LICEN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558634 VENDOR 316710 ALISON SABA 10041187 7/25 TRVL A SABA 001 - 156170 - 640300 -00000 0.00 10.18 0.00 7/25 TRVL A SABA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558408 VENDOR 203210 ALLEN MARKING PRODUCTS, INC. 10040924 343221 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 470.05 0.00 METAL FRAMES ADA TACTILE SIGNAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558201 VENDOR 109450 - ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORPORATION 10039711 210432 408 - 233352 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,753.72 0.00 100461 BLEACH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VCHR NET REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 255.55 81.55 0.00 81.55 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 90.35 178.35 0.00 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER 55.04 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558055 VENDOR 550 - ALPHA OMEGA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 0.00 10039712 029207 0.00 111 - 156310 - 646710 -00000 0.00 0.00 100956 COPIER SERVICES 0.00 548.53 10039714 029132 1.945.77 408- 210151 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2,494.30 101807 COPIER CHARGES 235.00 CHECK TOTAL 10039713 029197 111 - 156349 - 646710 -00000 0.00 100967 COPIER MAINTENANCE 10040931 029201 001. 121810. 634999 -00000 0.00 101560 COPIER REPAIR 10040340 029198 123 - 155975 - 646710 -33075 0.00 106786 COPIER MAINTENANCE 10039715 029093 490- 144618 - 651110 -00000 0.00 102699 COPIER CHARGES 10040340 029198 123 - 155973 - 646710 -33073 0.00 104346 COPIER MAINTENANCE CHECK NO 558416 VENDOR 211870 - AMERICAN DENTAL 10041854 PP #26 001 - 000000. 217400 -00000 0.00 PP #26 CHECK NO 558307 VENDOR 160840 - AMERICAN EUROCOPTER CORP. 10041020 520554901 001. 144510. 646860 -00000 0.00 105353 PARTS FOR HELICOPTER 10041020 520516101 001- 144510 - 646860 -00000 0.00 105353 PARTS FOR HELICOPTER CHECK NO 558589 VENDOR 295120 - AMERICAN LAFRANCE MEDICMASTER 10040932 9617 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 100125 FLEET PARTS CHECK NO 558700 VENDOR 331750 - AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 16JI PAGE 7 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 255.55 0.00 255.55 81.55 0.00 81.55 90.35 0.00 90.35 178.35 0.00 178.35 55.04 0.00 55.04 18.21 0.00 18.21 49.48 0.00 49.48 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 728.53 8.267.54 0.00 8.267.54 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8,267.54 548.53 0.00 548.53 1,945.77 0.00 1.945.77 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,494.30 235.00 0.00 235.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 235.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10038731 8709 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 120.00 0.00 ADVERTISING FOR CHIEF PLANNERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 8 VCHR NET 120.00 120.00 CHECK NO 558204 VENDOR 111740 - AMERICAN RED CROSS 10041024 09/05/01 111 - 156313 - 654360 -00000 0.00 1,363.00 111 - 156313 - 654110.00000 0.00 657.80 0.00 2,020.80 101708 INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL PROGRA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,020.80 CHECK NO 558388 VENDOR 193950 - AMERIGAS 10042066 A5578- 218815 408 - 233351 - 652410 -00000 0.00 29.66 0.00 29.66 100197 PROPANE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 29.66 CHECK NO 558221 VENDOR 115830 - AMJ EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 10041026 2001 -6257 408 - 253211 - 655100 -00000 0.00 3,053.81 0.00 3,053.81 100271 REPAIR OF GREAT LAKES INSTRUM 10041022 2001 -6352 408 - 253211 - 655100 -00000 0.00 3.333.87 0.00 3,333.87 100272 PARTS AND SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,387.68 CHECK NO 558669 VENDOR 326290 AMY TOZIER 10041085 9/4 -13 TRVL A TOZIER 123 - 155975 - 640200 -33075 0.00 45.82 0.00 45.82 9/4 -13 TRVL A TOZIER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.82 CHECK NO 558641 VENDOR 317980 ANCHOR HEALTH CENTER 10041018 06/4 -6/01 L.PECK 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 737.10 0.00 737.10 107602 MEDICAL BILLS 10041018 05/16 -18/01 C,CINTRON 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 276.90 0.00 276.90 107602 MEDICAL BILLS 10041018 05/18/01 C,CINTRON 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 401.05 0.00 401.05 107602 MEDICAL BILLS 10041018 07/13 08/11 -14101 R,VIOLE 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 2,212.60 0.00 2,212.60 107602 MEDICAL BILLS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 9 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041018 05/17/01 C,CITRON 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 308.75 0.00 308.75 107602 MEDICAL BILLS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,936.40 CHECK NO 558496 VENDOR 259380 - ANCHOR HEALTH CENTERS 10041114 R,LEIGH 08/14/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 34.45 0.00 34.45 08/14/01 MEDICA SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 34.45 CHECK NO 558718 VENDOR 336510 - ANCHOR TREE SERVICE 10041632 08/23/01 BARE FOOT BEACH 001 - 156363. 634999 -00000 0.00 495.00 0.00 495.00 107679 TREE TRIMMING 10039716 08/30/01 109. 182901 - 634999 -00000 0.00 650.00 0.00 650.00 107180 REMOVE AND TRIM TREES 10041632 08/23/01 COCOHATCHEE RIVE 001 - 156363 - 634999 -00000 0.00 475.00 0.00 475.00 107679 TREE TRIMMING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,620.00 CHECK NO 558614 VENDOR 306500 - ANDREA TAYLOR 10041186 8/28 -9/18 TRVL A TAYLOR 001 - 156130. 640200 -00000 0.00 50.46 0.00 50.46 8/28 -9/18 TRVL A TAYLOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.46 CHECK NO 558742 VENDOR 339920 ANDREW PERFILIO M.D. 10041608 D CHAVEZ 01 -170 681. 421190 - 631010 -00000 0.00 825.00 0.00 825.00 D CHAVEZ 01 -170 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 825.00 CHECK NO 558056 VENDOR 1080 APAC - FLORIDA, INC. 10040943 146564 408 - 253212 - 653110 -00000 0.00 358.75 0.00 358.75 107104 STONE TO BE ORDERED CHECK TOTAL 0.00 358.75 CHECK NO 558282 VENDOR 147700 - APAC OF FLORIDA, INC 10041691 #16 313. 163673 - 763100 -63041 0.00 400,293.00 0.00 400,293.00 4575 - THRU 8/26/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16JI PAGE 10 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400,293.00 CHECK NO 558759 VENDOR 342770 APCO, AFC INC. 10039705 023041 322 - 183825 - 634999.00000 0.00 240.00 0.00 SERVICE FOR FREQUENCY DATA COORDINAT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558312 VENDOR 161840 AQUIFER MAINTENANCE & PERFORMANCE 10041179 21153 408 - 253221. 634999 -00000 0.00 6,666.15 0.00 103927 SERVICE TO REPAIR WELLS 10041179 21153 412. 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 3,021.85 0.00 103927 SERVICE TO REPAIR WELLS 10041179 21160 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 1,392.41 0.00 103927 SERVICE TO REPAIR WELLS 10042105 21182 412 - 273511 - 634999.70057 0.00 3,540.00 0.00 103927 REPAIR OF WELLS 10042105 21202 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 2,570.00 0.00 103927 REPAIR OF WELLS 10041179 21166 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 5,041.97 0.00 103927 SERVICE TO REPAIR WELLS 10041179 21075 408. 253221. 634999 -00000 0.00 4,415.00 0.00 103927 SERVICE TO REPAIR WELLS 10041179 21171 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 1,372.06 0.00 103927 SERVICE TO REPAIR WELLS 10042105 21195 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 6,644.07 0.00 103927 REPAIR OF WELLS 10041179 2158 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 1,885.71 0.00 103927 SERVICE TO REPAIR WELLS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558598 VENDOR 300350 - ART'S PALM CARE 10041935 07/25/01 SPORTS COMPLEX 111- 156349 - 646319 -00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 PALM TREE TRIMMING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VCHR NET REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 50.16 398.75 0.00 398.75 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 50.16 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558807 VENDOR 900050 - ARZY AND ASSOCIATES 212687 3% TAX S /H /B LEE CO ARZY 193 - 919010 - 314300 -00000 0.00 3% TAX S /H /B LEE CO ARZY ASSO 212689 3X TAX S /H /B LEE CO ARZY 195 - 919010 - 314300.00000 0.00 3% TAX S /H /B LEE CO ARZY ASSO 212688 3% TAX S /H /B LEE CO ARZY 194 - 919010. 314300.00000 0.00 3% TAX S /H /B LEE CO ARZY ASSO CHECK NO 558542 VENDOR 278380 - ASCE /MEMBERSHIP 10041636 228628 G,YILMAZ 470 - 173410- 654210.00000 0.00 470 - 173410. 654110.00000 0.00 RENEWAL OF ASCE MEMBERSIP G,YILMAZ CHECK NO 558658 VENDOR 323320 - AT & T 10040942 056 286 1439 001 08/21/01 08/21/01 056 286 1439 001 10040926 056 567 6430 001 08/31/01 08/31/01 056 567 6430 001 10040942 730 511 5522 001 08/18/01 08/18/01 730 511 5522 001 10042063 056 282 7543 001 09/13/01 09/13/01 056 282 7543 001 10040942 056 286 1406 001 08/21/01 08/21/01 056 286 1406 001 10040942 056 282 5843 001 08/13/01 08/13/01 056 282 5843 001 10041113 056 283 9490 001 09/06/01 09/06/01 056 283 9490 001 10039744 056 284 2143 001 08/16/01 08/16/01 056 284 2143 001 CHECK NO 558453 VENDOR 236190 - AT &T 001 - 443010. 641900 -00000 521. 122410- 641400 -00000 001- 443010- 641900 -00000 408- 233352 - 641100 -00000 001 - 443010. 641900 -00000 001. 443010 - 641900 -00000 101- 163630 - 641900 -00000 495 - 192370 - 641900 -00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16JI PAGE 11 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 50.16 0.00 50.16 398.75 0.00 398.75 50.16 0.00 50.16 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 499.07 175.00 276.00 CHECK TOTAL 14.94 13.31 14.27 14.94 14.94 22.54 14.94 127.83 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 451.00 451.00 14.94 13.31 14.27 14.94 14.94 22.54 14.94 127.83 237.71 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041942 730 511 2831 001 08 27 01 100828 LONG DISTANCE 10042062 730 510 6293 001 09/09/01 09/09/01 730 510 6293 001 10040927 019 160 9636 001 08/27/01 08/27/01 019 160 9636 001 10042062 730 511 0335 001 09/06/01 09/06/01 730 511 0335 001 10042062 730 510 3638 001 09/12/01 09/12/01 730 510 3638 001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681 - 431310 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 156145 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 408- 233312. 641100.00000 0.00 408- 253221 - 641100 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558706 VENDOR 333620 - AT &T WIRELESS 10041979 10026082 09/05/01 408. 210130- 641700 -00000 18.74 106163 CELL PHONES 18.74 10041024 10058439 001 - 010110 - 641700 -00000 120.07 105186 CELLULARE PHONES 120.07 10041979 10026086 09/05/01 408 - 210130- 641700 -00000 CHECK TOTAL 106163 CELL PHONES 436.70 10040930 10032276 495 - 192370. 641700 -00000 781.47 105921 WIRELESS PHONE 781.47 10042064 9000062 09/05/01 001. 443010- 641700 -00000 0.56 09/05/01 9000062 0.56 10041979 10026082 08/05/01 408- 210130- 641700.00000 1,187.52 106163 CELL PHONES 1.187.52 10041945 10032617 09/05/01 681 - 421510 - 641700 -00000 CHECK TOTAL 105278 CELL PHONE 2,757.63 CHECK NO 558673 VENDOR 326540 - ATHLETICA 10041640 0015176 -IN 107113 POLYETHENE CHECK NO 558728 VENDOR 338180 - ATM'S INC. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16JI PAGE 12 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 32.31 0.00 32.31 18.74 0.00 18.74 62.14 0.00 62.14 120.07 0.00 120.07 203.44 0.00 203.44 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 436.70 49.92 0.00 49.92 781.47 0.00 781.47 327.62 0.00 327.62 0.56 0.00 0.56 185.99 0.00 185.99 1,187.52 0.00 1.187.52 224.55 0.00 224.55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,757.63 111. 156332 - 646315 -00000 0.00 950.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 950.00 0.00 950.00 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041021 2001335 313 - 163673. 631600 -00000 0.00 1,072.50 0.00 106571 APPRIASAL ON SIDEWALK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558654 VENDOR 321770 - ATOMIC ENERGY INDUSTRIAL 10040339 0147730 -1 001 - 122255 - 646970.00000 0.00 159.25 0.00 100375 RADIATION ANALYSIS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558619 VENDOR 309230 - ATTORNEY'S TITLE INSURANCE FUND INC 10040922 004314 306. 116360- 631650 -80095 0.00 25.00 0.00 TITLE SERVICE FOR BLUEBILL AVE /VANDE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558267 VENDOR 137430 AUDUBON JOINT VENTURE 10041952 287018 AUDUBON JOINT 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 AUDUBON JOINT 287018 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558294 VENDOR 152350 AUREUS INTERNATIONAL 10040947 0008540 001 - 144510- 652110 -00000 0.00 412.50 0.00 UNIFORM ITEMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558663 VENDOR 325080 AVANTE NAPLES 10039706 2012940 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 118.95 0.00 CAMP SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558574 VENDOR 286720 AZTEK COMMUNICATIONS 10040923 1361 001 - 144210 - 646610 -00000 0.00 250.00 0.00 COMPUTER RUNS 10040933 1365 111 - 156310 - 634999 -00000 0.00 388.00 0.00 101039 DATA AND PHONE LINES 10041025 1283 001 - 121148 - 634999.00000 0.00 1,180.00 0.00 101073 PHONE AND WIRING SERVICE SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10039717 1369 107169 PORT RACK MOUNT 10041025 1345 101073 PHONE AND WIRING SERVICE 10040338 1362 107284 WIRING AND RELOCATIONS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 121143 - 634999 -00000 0.00 001 - 121148 - 634999.00000 0.00 001 - 121143. 634999.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558285 VENDOR 147980 - B & B TOWING 0.00 1,836.00 10039718 44804 220.00 715.00 521. 122410- 646415.00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 100184 TOWING 45.50 0.00 45.50 10039718 45964 35.00 35.00 521 - 122410. 646415 -00000 0.00 35.00 100184 TOWING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.50 10039718 45838 152.00 39.50 521. 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 137.00 100184 TOWING 35.00 0.00 35.00 10039718 44699 363.50 25.20 521 - 122410 - 646415.00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 100184 TOWING CHECK NO 558697 VENDOR 331390 - B & B TOWING HH SERVICES INC. 10039719 0134 521. 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 105876 CHARGING FOR TOWING SERVICES 10039719 5059 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 105876 CHARGING FOR TOWING SERVICES 10039719 5173 521 - 122410. 646415 -00000 0.00 105876 CHARGING FOR TOWING SERVICES 10039719 0139 521. 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 105876 CHARGING FOR TOWING SERVICES CHECK NO 558250 VENDOR 129820 - B & W GOLF CARS, INC 10039720 005480 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100091 FLEET INVENTORY 16JI PAGE 14 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 1.836.00 0.00 1,836.00 220.00 0.00 220.00 715.00 0.00 715.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,589.00 45.50 0.00 45.50 35.00 0.00 35.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.50 152.00 0.00 152.00 39.50 0.00 39.50 137.00 0.00 137.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 363.50 25.20 0.00 25.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.20 SEPTEMBER 26. 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 15 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558677 VENDOR 326810 - B R B DEVELOPMENT 10040920 1043 111 - 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 2001080040 10041941 1058 111 - 138911 - 634804.00000 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 2001060195 10040919 1042 111 - 138911 - 634804.00000 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 2001061136 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 555.00 CHECK NO 558727 VENDOR 337770 - B &H PHOTO -VIDEO INC. 10040232 66620070 - 7212096 001 - 100130- 652990 -00000 0.00 3.930.40 0.00 3.930.40 107096 PANASONIC RECORDER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,930.40 CHECK NO 558286 VENDOR 149020 - B.J. EXCAVATING ENTERPRISES. INC 10041629 81593 322 - 183825 - 634999 -00000 0.00 17,000.00 0.00 17,000.00 107106 SUPPLY EQUIPMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17,000.00 CHECK NO 558059 VENDOR 1740 BAKER & TAYLOR CO 10039740 5003246085 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 224.24 0.00 224.24 101707 BOOKS 10039740 2007939458 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 160.93 0.00 160.93 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003243896 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 750.22 0.00 750.22 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003239142 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 574.76 0.00 574.76 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003239140 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 130.40 0.00 130.40 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003239145 355 - 156190. 766100.00000 0.00 51.90 0.00 51.90 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003239452 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 420.79 0.00 420.79 101707 BOOKS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 16 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10039740 3004724570 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 79.02 0.00 79.02 101707 BOOKS 10039740 2007846093 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 459.64 0.00 459.64 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003229717 129 - 156110. 766100 -33773 0.00 82.77 0.00 82.77 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003222900 129 - 156110 - 766100 -33773 0.00 76.95 0.00 76.95 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003246095 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 796.87 0.00 796.87 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003246098 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 20.34 0.00 20.34 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003239144 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 1,532.93 0.00 1,532.93 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003239479 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 230.85 0.00 230.85 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003247240 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 1.724.28 0.00 1.724.28 101707 BOOKS 10039740 2007939450 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 155.22 0.00 155.22 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003221559 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 225.13 0.00 225.13 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003246096 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 100.35 0.00 100.35 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003222900 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 481.28 0.00 481.28 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003250089 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 12.84 0.00 12.84 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003246094 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 208.17 0.00 208.17 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003229718 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 181.19 0.00 181.19 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003229717 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 18.60 0.00 18.60 101707 BOOKS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10039740 5003239141 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003252466 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003246161 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003243919 101707 BOOKS 10040233 J30NS3062A 107327 TITLE SOURSE ON THE WEB 10039740 5003239143 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003239177 101707 BOOKS 10039740 5003243931 101707 BOOKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 558427 VENDOR SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190- 766100.00000 0.00 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558427 VENDOR 215140 - BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. 10041631 G31541570 0.00 4,090.00 0.00 355. 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS CHECK TOTAL 10041631 B41673871 22.49 0.00 35.15 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 35.15 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 0.00 10041631 R21111923 233.73 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21111922 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 B41020522 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 C31476690 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 B41463270 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 B41615041 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 55.08 0.00 143.90 0.00 5.37 0.00 159.40 0.00 4,090.00 0.00 812.40 0.00 325.75 0.00 6.96 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 17 VCHR NET 55.08 143.90 5.37 159.40 4,090.00 812.40 325.75 6.96 14,298.53 0.00 40.91 0.00 40.91 0.00 83.16 0.00 83.16 0.00 44.98 0.00 44.98 0.00 18.73 0.00 18.73 0.00 22.49 0.00 22.49 0.00 35.15 0.00 35.15 0.00 41.38 0.00 41.38 0.00 233.73 0.00 233.73 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041631 G31514100 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 B41642040 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21023320 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 B41641960 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21023322 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21311370 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 B41673870 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21060570 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 B41020521 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 E41615042 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R20980970 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21111920 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21111921 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21204540 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 G31468180 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21220630 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041631 R21023321 107655 MEDIA FOR ALL LOCATIONS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 24.75 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190. 766100.00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 24.75 0.00 453.77 0.00 146.11 0.00 62.84 0.00 149.95 0.00 74.82 0.00 158.38 0.00 22.63 0.00 478.39 0.00 48.93 0.00 44.36 0.00 237.76 0.00 14.96 0.00 168.26 0.00 40.55 0.00 48.82 0.00 37.48 0.00 PAGE 18 VCHR NET 24.75 453.77 146.11 62.84 149.95 74.82 158.38 22.63 478.39 48.93 44.36 237.76 14.96 168.26 40.55 48.82 37.48 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 19 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,733.29 CHECK NO 558808 VENDOR 900050 BANYAN WOODS LLC 212637 286647 BANYAN WOODS 113 - 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 BANYAN WOODS 286647 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 CHECK NO 558667 VENDOR 326080 BARANY,SCHMITT,SUMMERS,WEAVER AND 10041689 1991 368. 116360 - 631500 -00163 0.00 11,139.00 0.00 11,139.00 102865 - 7/1/01 THRU 7/31101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11,139.00 CHECK NO 558809 VENDOR 900050 - BARBARA BAILIE 212642 REFUND ADOPTION B,BAILIE 001 - 155410. 346410 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 BARBARA BAILIE REFUND ADOPTION 212643 REFUND ADOPTION B,BAILIE 610 - 155410 - 346450 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 BARBARA BAILIE REFUND ADOPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.00 CHECK NO 558797 VENDOR 900030 - BARBARA PITTS 212661 10/18 - 5/4/01 TRVL B PITTS 001. 156150- 640200 -00000 0.00 139.78 0.00 139.78 10/18 - 5/4/01 TRVL B PITTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 139.78 CHECK NO 558422 VENDOR 214360 - BARNES & NOBLE BOOKSTORE #2632 10040940 01106765 001 - 121140. 654110 -00000 0.00 101.56 0.00 101.56 BOOKS 10040934 09/05/01 111911 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 543.73 0.00 543.73 107398 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 645.29 CHECK NO 558029 VENDOR 105290 - BAY POINTE SOUTH INC. 10040918 M.SAINVAL 09/18 W -1004 001- 155930 - 634153.00000 0.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 450.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558060 VENDOR 1810 - BEACON BOWL 10041641 10 BOWLING 111. 156343 - 634999 -00000 0.00 875.00 0.00 105663 BOWLING FIELD TRIP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 20 VCHR NET 875.00 875.00 CHECK NO 558810 VENDOR 900050 - BEATRIZ HERNANDEZ 212633 REFUND ADOPTION B,HERNAND 001.155410- 346410 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 B,HERNANDEZ REFUND ADOPTION 212634 REFUND ADOPTION B,HERNAND 610 - 155410 - 346450 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 B,HERNANDEZ REFUND ADOPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 558636 VENDOR 316940 BELLOMO- HERBERT & CO. 10041679 00.512 346 - 116360- 763100 -80602 0.00 37,746.71 0.00 37,746.71 6510 - THRU 8/23/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 37,746.71 CHECK NO 558349 VENDOR 174260 BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS 10040935 216702 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 76.11 0.00 76.11 102134 TELEPHONE DIRECTORIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 76.11 CHECK NO 558061 VENDOR 1850 - BENTLEY ELECTRIC CO. 10041630 6477 111 - 163646 - 763100 -60039 0.00 3,002.50 0.00 3,002.50 107562 REPAIR SIGNAL & LIGHTING 10041628 6476 111 - 163646 - 763100 -60039 0.00 8,812.00 0.00 8,812.00 107559 REPAIR SIGNALS AND STREET LIG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11,814.50 CHECK NO 558062 VENDOR 1910 - BETTER ROADS, INC. 10042021 21714 111 - 163645 - 653130 -00000 0.00 7,741.90 0.00 7,741.90 100810 ASPHALT 10042006 21564 155 - 112593 - 634999.00000 0.00 3,472.87 0.00 3,472.87 105910 THRU 8122101 10042006 21477 155 - 112593 - 763100 -00000 0.00 59,053.30 0.00 59,053.30 105910 THRU 8/22/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VCHR NET REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 56,307.65 1,264.52- 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 0.00 12,645.25 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10041690 21576 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60016 0.00 0.00 106186 - THRU 8/15/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10042104 21575 (RETAINAGE) 313 - 000000. 205100 -00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 106663 TRU 8/17/01 (RETAINAGE) 50.00 10.00 10042104 21575 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60025 0.00 10.00 106663 TRU 8/17/01 0.00 111.68 10041690 21576 (RETAINAGE) 313 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 0.00 106186 - THRU 8/15/01 (RETAINAGE) CHECK NO 558570 VENDOR 285340 - BILL SMITH APPLIANCES 10041940 557456 111 - 156395 - 652910 -00000 0.00 32" COLOR TV FOR COMMUNITY CENTER 10042068 08/30/01 TV 111. 156395- 764370 -00000 0.00 107303 50" ZENITH TV CHECK NO 558811 VENDOR 900050 - BJ & K CONSTRUCTION 212636 286868 BJ &K CONSTRUCTION 113 - 000000- 115420.00000 0.00 BJ &K CONSTRUCTION CHECK NO 558812 VENDOR 900050 - BLUEBILL VACATION PROPERTIES INC 212635 287016 BLUEBILL 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 BLUEBILL 287016 CHECK NO 558305 VENDOR 159870 - BLUELINE INC. 10041642 1046015 113 - 138931 - 652990 -00000 0.00 1010731 TONER AND PAPER 10041642 101145492 113 - 138931 - 652990 -00000 0.00 1010731 TONER AND PAPER CHECK NO 558063 VENDOR 2270 - BOARD OF CNTY COMMISSIONERS 16JI PAGE 21 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 56,307.65 0.00 56,307.65 1,264.52- 0.00 1,264.52- 12,645.25 0.00 12,645.25 5,630.76- 0.00 5,630.76 - CHECK TOTAL 0.00 132,325.69 449.99 0.00 449.99 999.00 0.00 999.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,448.99 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.00 111.68 0.00 111.68 511.84 0.00 511.84 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 623.52 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 22 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041850 PP #26 001 - 000000- 217210 -00000 0.00 1,060.23 001 - 000000 - 217220 -00000 0.00 3,148.30 0.00 4,208.53 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,208.53 CHECK NO 558064 VENDOR 2310 BOB DEAN SUPPLY, INC. 10039721 873893 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 279.34 0.00 279.34 BOB DEAN SUPPLY, INC. 10040936 875362 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 379.45 0.00 379.45 100090 FLEET PARTS 10042065 31378 408 - 233312. 655200 -00000 0.00 19.38 0.00 19.38 101398 BEARINGS 10041643 873633 408- 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 15.09 0.00 15.09 101398 BEARINGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 693.26 CHECK NO 558256 VENDOR 133300 BOB TAYLOR CHEVROLET 10039722 112146 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 100126 FLEET INVENTORY AN LABOR 10039722 112224 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 9.88 0.00 9.88 100126 FLEET INVENTORY AN LABOR 10039722 112185 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 15.94 0.00 15.94 100126 FLEET INVENTORY AN LABOR 10039722 112116 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 495.48 0.00 495.48 100126 FLEET INVENTORY AN LABOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 525.30 CHECK NO 558338 VENDOR 168720 - BONITA AUTO SUPPLY /NAPA 10039723 538313 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 5.89 0.00 5.89 100148 AUTO PARTS 10039723 538102 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 41.18 0.00 41.18 100148 AUTO PARTS 10039723 536923 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 5.23 0.00 5.23 100148 AUTO PARTS 10039723 538425 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 23.88 0.00 23.88 100148 AUTO PARTS 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10039723 538305 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 56.81 0.00 100148 AUTO PARTS 10039723 536815 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 89.76 0.00 100148 AUTO PARTS 10039723 536945 521.122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 17.05 0.00 100148 AUTO PARTS 10039723 537298 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 13.20 0.00 100148 AUTO PARTS 10039723 538369 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 33.97 0.00 100148 AUTO PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558689 VENDOR 329590 BONNESS INC 10042011 2020 313 - 163673 - 634999 -66076 0.00 6.550.12 0.00 106517 - SPEED BUMPS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558462 VENDOR 246690 BOOKS -A- MILLION #661 10040921 08/31/01 BOOKS A MILLION 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 205.99 0.00 CHILDRENS TITLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558509 VENDOR 261990 - BORELLI CONSTRUCTION OF NAPLES 10041953 283876 BORELLI CONSTRUCTI 113 - 138900 - 322110 -00000 0.00 690.72 0.00 BORELLI CONSTRUCTION 283876 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558347 VENDOR 172970 - BRACKEN POOLS, INC. 10041937 51278 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 167.85 0.00 8 HOLE GRATE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558813 VENDOR 900050 - BREAKWATER CUSTOM HOMES INC 212638 286579 BREAKWATER 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 70.00 0.00 BREAKWATER 286579 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558750 VENDOR 341690 - BRITT E. HIRST 10040937 09/13/01 VINEYARDS PARK 111 - 156390 - 634999.00000 0.00 347.50 0.00 107066 FEE FOR PAID INSTRUCTOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558814 VENDOR 900050 BRITTANY BAY PARTNERS LTD 212640 285362 BRITTANY 113 - 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 285362 BRITTARY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558035 VENDOR 133150 BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF 10041055 98 4511 001. 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558036 VENDOR 133150 BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF 10041058 98 4353 001 - 013010- 649040 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558037 VENDOR 133150 BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF 10041061 97 4070 001 - 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558038 VENDOR 133150 BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF 10041063 97 1193 001. 013010. 649040 -00000 0.00 21.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558034 VENDOR 133150 BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF 10041054 98 4513 001 - 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558033 VENDOR 133150 BROWARD COUNTY SHERIFF 10041053 98 4518 001 - 013010. 649040 -00000 0.00 21.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558547 VENDOR 279760 BROWN & BROWN, INC. 10041944 09/04/01 DEPOSIT 681 - 431310 - 645300.00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 100829 LIABILITY INSURANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558381 VENDOR 192760 - BRUCE M. BRIDEWELL, M.D.,P.A. 10041115 I,RODRIQUEZ 01/09/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 01/09/01 MEDICAL SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558290 VENDOR 151240 - BSN 10041938 90736726 111 - 156341 - 652910 -00000 0.00 142.91 0.00 SOFTBALL HOME PLATE EXTENSIONS 10041939 90742452 111 - 156341 - 652990 -00000 0.00 206.40 0.00 PLASTIC CONES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558597 VENDOR 299180 - BUMPER TO BUMPER PARTS DEPO 10040938 I259469 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 5.98 0.00 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259145 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 4.76 0.00 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259363 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 7.98 0.00 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041645 I251969 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 73.15 0.00 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041940 C22501 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 129.56- 0.00 101524 CREDIT ON PARTS 10041644 I251982 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 4.92 0.00 101131 FLEET FILTERS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 26 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10039724 I259478 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 11.98 0.00 11.98 101131 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259364 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 7.98 0.00 7.98 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259328 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 78.01 0.00 78.01 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041940 C22530 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 23.96- 0.00 23.96- 101524 CREDIT ON PARTS 10041644 I251968 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 9.78 0.00 9.78 101131 FLEET FILTERS 10041645 I251895 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 19.27 0.00 19.27 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259626 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 7.38 0.00 7.38 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259236 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 5.88 0.00 5.88 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259155 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 7.98 0.00 7.98 101524 FLEET PARTS 10039724 I259385 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 7.30 0.00 7.30 101131 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259531 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 19.80 0.00 19.80 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259617 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 34.65 0.00 34.65 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259256 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 11.76 0.00 11.76 101524 FLEET PARTS 10039724 I259220 521. 122410- 646425.00000 0.00 65.32 0.00 65.32 101131 FLEET PARTS 10041645 I251998 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 24.62 0.00 24.62 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041940 C22485 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 11.47- 0.00 11.47- 101524 CREDIT ON PARTS 10040938 I259139 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 7.25 0.00 7.25 101524 FLEET PARTS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6J 1 PAGE 27 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10040938 1259154 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 11.92 0.00 11.92 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259541 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 5.98 0.00 5.98 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 1259157 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 10.44 0.00 10.44 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041645 I251971 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 58.96 0.00 58.96 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 1259218 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 18.28 0.00 18.28 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259314 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 15.51 0.00 15.51 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259539 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 11.78 0.00 11.78 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041645 I251965 521. 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 54.96 0.00 54.96 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041644 I251957 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 18.15 0.00 18.15 101131 FLEET FILTERS 10039725 C22332 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 ?.17- 0.00 2.17- 101524 CREDIT FOR PARTS 10040938 I259182 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 215 0.00 2.15 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259269 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 11.6 0.00 11.46 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 1259397 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 12.81 0.00 12.85 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259289 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 1.35 0.00 1.35 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041940 C22531 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 100.00- 0.00 100.00- 101524 CREDIT ON PARTS 10040938 1259327 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 24.21 0.00 24.21 101524 FLEET PARTS 10039724 I259091 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 13.18 0.00 13.18 101131 FLEET PARTS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10040938 I259305 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259511 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259309 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259513 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259214 101524 FLEET PARTS 10040938 I259465 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041645 I252027 101524 FLEET PARTS 10039725 C22330 101524 CREDIT FOR PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VCHR DISC SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558730 VENDOR 338610 - BURNS VETERINARY SUPPLY 10041646 5254687 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 106276 VET SUPPLIES 10041646 5259099 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 106276 VET SUPPLIES 10041646 5258598 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 106276 VET SUPPLIES CHECK NO 558065 VENDOR 2620 - BUSINESS MACHINE SALES 10041943 053739 368 - 116360 - 763100 -00165 106788 CASH REGISTER 10040939 053748 313 - 163611 - 644620 -00000 103705 MAINT OF COPIER CHECK NO 558372 VENDOR 186290 - BWI /BOOK WHOLESALERS, INC. 16JI PAGE 28 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 11.46 0.00 11.46 6.45 0.00 6.45 5.34 0.00 5.34 8.27 0.00 8.27 10.44 0.00 10.44 3.22 0.00 3.22 36.00 0.00 36.00 55.00- 0.00 55.00 - CHECK TOTAL 0.00 445.95 0.00 87.20 0.00 87.20 0.00 184.00 0.00 184.00 0.00 584.83 0.00 584.83 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 856.03 0.00 879.00 0.00 879.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 951.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 29 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10039707 1144650 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 40.04 0.00 40.04 CHILDRENS TITLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.04 CHECK NO 558444 VENDOR 230790 - C.E.D. INC. 10041146 4977 - 289213 322 - 183825 - 652990 -00000 0.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 105820 JUNCTION BOXES 10041126 4977 - 288310 101 - 163630 - 634999 -00000 0.00 272.81 0.00 272.81 100331 SUPPLIES 10041153 4977 - 288099 322 - 183825- 652990 -00000 0.00 380.40 0.00 380.40 105820 250W LAMPS 10041142 4977 - 182265 778 - 182701 - 652990 -00000 0.00 78.03 0.00 78.03 104452 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 871.24 CHECK NO 558382 VENDOR 193260 CALYPSO CAR WASH 10041130 CAR WASH AUGUST 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 334.14 0.00 334.14 100057 CAR WASH 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 334.14 CHECK NO 558196 VENDOR 108520 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. 10042015 80101016/18 411 - 273511 - 631400 -70052 0.00 11,600.84 0.00 11,600.84 914970 - 7/8/01 THRU 8 /18 /01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11,600.84 CHECK NO 558068 VENDOR 2860 - CAPRI LAWN & GARDEN EQUIP 10041147 72529 521- 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 69.34 0.00 69.34 105953 SUPPLIES 10040124 072477 001. 172930- 652990 -00000 0.00 218.35 0.00 218.35 100314 SUPPLIES 10041160 072776 101 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 331.68 0.00 331.68 100838 SUPPLIES 10041148 072388 101. 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 24.24 0.00 24.24 100838 SUPPLIES 10041152 072715 198- 157410 - 646314 -00000 0.00 44.46 0.00 44.46 058787 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 30 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041147 072704 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100.80 0.00 100.80 105953 SUPPLIES 10040124 072259 001 - 172930 - 652990 -00000 0.00 414.80 0.00 414.80 100314 SUPPLIES 10041147 072372 521 - 122410- 646425.00000 0.00 77.15 0.00 77.15 105953 SUPPLIES 10040124 071910 001 - 172930 - 652990 -00000 0.00 87.03 0.00 87.03 100314 SUPPLIES 10041147 72409 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 6.02 0.00 6.02 105953 SUPPLIES 10041148 072389 101 - 163646. 634999 -00000 0.00 7.08 0.00 7.08 100838 SUPPLIES 10041151 072713 198 - 157410 - 646314 -00000 0.00 158.61 0.00 158.61 058789 SUPPLIES 10041147 072361 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 11.95 0.00 11.95 105953 SUPPLIES 10041147 72435 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 26.72 0.00 26.72 105953 SUPPLIES 10041147 072371 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 4.84 0.00 4.84 105953 SUPPLIES 10041151 072714 198 - 157410 - 646314 -00000 0.00 57.25 0.00 57.25 058789 SUPPLIES 10041147 072620 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 54.72 0.00 54.72 105953 SUPPLIES 10041418 072534 001 - 156363 - 764990.00000 0.00 1,522.74 0.00 1.522.74 107205 SUPPLIES 10041147 072447 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 195.96 0.00 195.96 105953 SUPPLIES 10041147 72417 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 2.21 0.00 2.21 105953 SUPPLIES 10041417 073151 111. 156332. 764180 -00000 0.00 999.99 0.00 999.99 107346 SUPPLIES 10041147 72469 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 22.50 0.00 22.50 105953 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041149 072125 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 7.91- 0.00 105953 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558387 VENDOR 193540 CARIBBEAN LAWN SERVICE 10041145 3381 141 - 112555. 634999 -00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 100864 LAWN SVC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558066 VENDOR 2810 CARLTON, FIELDS, WARD, EMMANUAL, 10041543 233235 111 - 138317 - 631100.00000 0.00 16.847.09 0.00 101931 THRU 4/30/01 10041543 239355 111 - 138317 - 631100 -00000 0.00 15,631.99 0.00 101931 THRU 6/30/01 10041127 233232 111 - 138317 - 631100 -00000 0.00 1.097.27 0.00 101931 SUS THRU 2/28 10041127 233233 111 - 138317 - 631100 -00000 0.00 1,922.45 0.00 101931 SVS THRU 3/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558815 VENDOR 900050 CAROL MULLEN 212609 REFUND PARKS C,MULLEN 111 - 156390 - 347990 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 C,MULLEN REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558816 VENDOR 900050 CAROLYN ROTH 212644 REFUND PARKS C.ROTH 111 - 156380- 347990 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 REFUND PARKS C. ROTH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558404 VENDOR 201920 CARTER FENCE COMPANY INC. 10041667 8682 111. 156313 - 646317 -00000 0.00 275.00 0.00 058683 REPAIR CHAIN FENCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558353 VENDOR 174780 - CARUS CHEMICAL CO. 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041841 10019048 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 5,048.57 0.00 100247 CHEMICALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558275 VENDOR 144310 CARVEL ICE CREAM 10040126 213768 111 - 156341 - 652210 -00000 0.00 756.40 0.00 107068 ICE CREAM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558783 VENDOR 343730 CASEY W. MORRIS 10041218 REIM FOR CLASS D LICENSE 408. 253212- 649010 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 C.MORRIS REIMB CLASS LICENSE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558752 VENDOR 342030 CASTLE CRAFT 10040207 SC10917 313- 163673 - 763100.66066 0.00 955.00 0.00 107142 JON BOAT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558732 VENDOR 339000 CATHERINE N. KOWAL,MD 10041214 J. MONTGOMERY 9/5/01 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 61.75 0.00 059029 J. MONTGOMERY 9/5/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558798 VENDOR 900030 - CATHY MEAD 212662 10/17- 7/2/01 TRVL C MEAD 001- 156150. 640300 -00000 0.00 42.34 0.00 10/17- 7/2/01 TRVL C MEAD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558552 VENDOR 281500 - CDWG 10041129 EJ22271 001 - 157110 - 651910 -00000 0.00 90.71 001. 157110 - 641950 -00000 0.00 5.49 0.00 058703 MODEM FOR COMPUTER 10041141 EJ30578 113. 138935- 651910 -00000 0.00 111.00 113. 138935- 641950 -00000 0.00 14.50 0.00 058701 BACK UPS PERMIT PICK UP SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041410 EJ34364 001. 155410 - 764950 -00000 0.00 781.89 0.00 107023 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558712 VENDOR 334310 CDWG GOVERNMENT, INC. 10041139 EI11686 001- 121140 - 646910.00000 0.00 970.99 0.00 106964 HARD DRIVES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558392 VENDOR 196910 CECIL'S COPY EXPRESS 10041161 12305 111. 138317 - 647110.00000 0.00 144.77 0.00 100450 SUPPLIES 10040125 12286 408. 210105- 651210 -00000 0.00 561.00 0.00 101767 COPIES 10041159 12114 001 - 100130 - 647110 -00000 0.00 1,795.25 0.00 102626 COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558434 VENDOR 222190 CED, INC. CREDIT 10041143 4977 - 182259 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 13.76 0.00 106330 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558507 VENDOR 261700 CENTEX HOMES 10041565 REF 283974 CENTEX 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 REF 283974 CENTEX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558479 VENDOR 254690 CENTURY RAIN AID 10041144 522467 322 - 183825- 646311 -00000 0.00 332.31 0.00 058375$ IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 10041416 538859 001- 122240 - 646311 -00000 0.00 153.45 0.00 057880 SUPPLIES 10041416 535786 001 - 122240. 646311 -00000 0.00 83.74 0.00 057880 SUPPLIES 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558069 VENDOR 3050 - CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 10041415 590916 001 - 122240 - 652510 -00000 0.00 142.88 0.00 059087 CUT THRU AEROSOL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558311 VENDOR 161760 CERTIFIED SLINGS INC. 10041150 237890 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 554.34 0.00 100131 BINDER CHAINS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558670 VENDOR 326390 CGLOBE 10040123 0034 470. 173410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 3,575.00 0.00 107151 MEDIA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558817 VENDOR 900050 CHARLES STEINBACHER 212613 REF 275862 C.STNBCHR 113 - 138900 - 343940.00000 0.00 125.00 0.00 REF 275862 C. STEINBACHER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558030 VENDOR 110230 CHARLOTTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. 10041051 98 4628 001 - 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558258 VENDOR 133880 CHECKPOINT 10041124 I15864 301 - 155410 - 763100 -80096 0.00 1,925.00 0.00 107081 MONITORING 10041217 I15836 408 - 233352 - 652990 -00000 0.00 499.00 0.00 057927 SECURITY EQUIPMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558326 VENDOR 165950 - CHECKPOINT, LTD. 10041171 A157270 001 - 122240. 646281 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 102343 MONITORING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041171 A134928 001- 122240 - 646281.00000 0.00 24.95 0.00 102343 MONITORING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558386 VENDOR 193460 CHEMICAL LIME COMPANY 10041154 00126210 408- 253211 - 652310.00000 0.00 2,867.44 0.00 100248 SUPPLIES 10041128 00126404 408- 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,817.03 0.00 100248 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558818 VENDOR 900050 CHERYLANN AMODEO 212684 REFUND ADOPTIONS C,AMODEO 001 - 155410 - 346410 -00000 0.00 96.00 0.00 C,AMODEO REFUND ADOPTIONS 212686 REFUND ADOPTIONS C,AMODEO 610 - 155410 - 329810.00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 C,AMODEO REFUND ADOPTIONS 212685 REFUND ADOPTIONS C,AMODEO 001 - 155410 - 329810.00000 0.00 23.00 0.00 C,AMODEO REFUND ADOPTIONS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558278 VENDOR 146710 - CHRISTINE FORSZPANIAK M.D. 10041213 L KODAK 8/29/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 059030 L. KODAK 8/29/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558042 VENDOR 183390 - CHUCK HOLLAND 10041131 T. ANDERSON RENT 9/01 001. 155930- 634153.00000 0.00 450.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558070 VENDOR 3360 CITY OF EVERGLADES 10041216 176 8/25/01 198- 157430 - 643400 -00000 0.00 237.83 0.00 176 8/25/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558071 VENDOR 3390 CITY OF NAPLES 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041125 3026 472 - 173422 - 881300 -00000 0.00 2,091.12 0.00 104188 SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558339 VENDOR 168900 - CITY OF NAPLES 10041668 LOCKBOX W/E 9/21/01 408. 000000- 208750 -00000 0.00 7,665.06 408. 000000- 208751 -00000 0.00 1,924.67 408. 000000- 208764 -00000 0.00 24.56 0.00 LOCKBOX W/E 9/21/01 10041669 COLLECTIONS W/E 9/21/01 408 - 000000 - 208750 -00000 0.00 3,985.24 408 - 000000- 208751.00000 0.00 1,092.82 408 - 000000- 208756.00000 0.00 2,610.00 408- 000000 - 208758.00000 0.00 900.00 408 - 000000- 208764.00000 0.00 45.81 0.00 COLLECTIONS W/E 9/21/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558205 VENDOR 111750 - CLARK'S NURSERY 10039046 46205 470 - 173441 - 646314 -00000 0.00 230.00 0.00 055928 PLANTS 10039965 46261 470. 173441- 646314 -00000 0.00 265.00 0.00 058404 LALNSCAPE INPROVEMENTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558591 VENDOR 296230 CLERK OF COURTS - HIGHLAND COUNTY 10041867 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 218810 -00000 0.00 177.62 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558041 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 10041512 CC VS JOHN FASSETT99 -3040 313. 163673- 761100 -65041 0.00 38,696.35 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558336 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 10042107 2422311 001. 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 7.00 0.00 101500 SUBPEONAS 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558265 VENDOR 136290 - CLIPPING BUREAU OF FLORIDA 10039782 93506 001 - 100130- 652990.00000 0.00 152.78 0.00 102703 NEWS CLIPPINGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558577 VENDOR 288710 - COAST PUMP & SUPPLY CO INC 10041296 240641 0 322 - 183825. 646311 -00000 0.00 649.47 0.00 107245 SPRINKLER SUPPLIES 10041297 240687 00 322. 183825. 646311 -00000 0.00 140.66 0.00 107245 SPRINKLER SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558365 VENDOR 182370 - COASTAL APPRAISAL SERVICES 10042117 28737 313 - 163673 - 631600 -60071 0.00 0.00 333 - 163650 - 631600 -60071 0.00 5,588.25 0.00 6330 APPRAISALS 7/12- 8/24/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558073 VENDOR 3570 - COASTAL COURIER 10041772 3122 001. 010510 - 641950 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 058995 COURIER SVC. 7/17/01 10041775 3606 001 - 010110 - 641950 -00000 0.00 8.00 0.00 103137 SERVICE 8/1/01 10041315 3383 001 - 061010- 631600 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 59047 HERITAGE SQUARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558819 VENDOR 900050 - COASTAL PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL 212631 286407 COASTAL PLUMBING 113 - 000000 - 209102 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 COASTAL PLUMBING 286407 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558410 VENDOR 205190 - COLLIER ANESTHESIA P.A. 10041619 A CAGLE 8/20/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 63.05 0.00 107681 A CAGLE 8/20/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041619 R VIOLETTE 8/12 -13/01 107681 R VIOLETTE 8/12 -31/01 10041619 L KODAK 8/28/01 107681 L KODAK 8/28/01 10041619 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 107681 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558074 VENDOR 3600 - COLLIER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 10041959 COPICARD 8/15/01 001 - 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 101954 COPICARD CHECK NO 558820 VENDOR 900050 - COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT 212630 284640 COLLIER COUNTY DEV 113. 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT 284640 CHECK NO 558075 VENDOR 3620 - COLLIER COUNTY HEALTH DEPT 0.00 10041458 K BRANDES 8/8/01 001- 155410 - 649990 -00000 0.00 111 - 156381 - 634999.00000 58970 K BRANDES 8/8/01 111 - 156343 - 634999 -00000 0.00 10041457 A MARTINDALE 8/8/01 001 - 155410. 649990 -00000 0.00 0.00 58971 A MARTINDALE 8/8/01 135.00 0.00 10041458 P HENRY 8/8/01 001- 155410 - 649990.00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 58970 P HENRY 8/8/01 540.00 1,935.10 10041457 R BEHRE 8/8/01 001 - 155410 - 649990 -00000 0.00 58971 R BEHRE 8/8/01 CHECK NO 558076 VENDOR 3650 - COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 10041065 #50 130 - 157710 - 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 156395. 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 156390 - 634999.00000 0.00 111 - 156381 - 634999.00000 0.00 111 - 156343 - 634999 -00000 0.00 105623 8/01 CHARGES 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 936.00 0.00 663.00 0.00 273.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 38 VCHR NET 936.00 663.00 273.00 1,935.05 20.00 0.00 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.00 2.433.00 0.00 2,433.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.433.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 540.00 1,935.10 387.18 1,161.06 1,161.06 774.04 1,161.06 0.00 6,579.50 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041780 281 111 - 156343 - 634999 -00000 0.00 178.82 0.00 057797 FIELD TRIP TRANS. 10042072 #34 001 - 157110 - 644100 -00000 0.00 0.00 001 - 157110 - 654360.00000 0.00 760.00 0.00 107620 TRAINING TUITION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558777 VENDOR 343610 - COLLIER COUNTY SERVICE CENTER, INC. 10041302 CCM56231 198 - 157410 - 652960.00000 0.00 2,147.29 0.00 107661 SHERMAN TANK PADS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558032 VENDOR 130700 COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT 10041062 97 1193 001 - 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558031 VENDOR 130700 COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT 10041057 98 4353 001 - 013010. 649040 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558078 VENDOR 3690 COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DIV. 10041696 03901643700 8/1/- 8/31/01 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 188.19 0.00 03901643700 8/1. 8/31/01 10042087 04601343400 8/6- 9/7/01 490 - 144610 - 643400.00000 0.00 29.00 0.00 04601343400 8/6- 9/7/01 10042087 04500046000 8/6- 9/7/01 408. 233351 - 643400 -00000 0.00 26.88 0.00 04500046000 8/6/01 THRU 9/7/01 10041696 03900160900 8/1- 8/30/01 001 - 156363. 643400 -00000 0.00 29.00 0.00 03900160900 8/1/01- 8/30/01 10041696 03901644200 8/1- 8/31/01 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 03901644200 8/1/01 - 8/31/01 10041696 03603211900 8/3- 8/30/01 111 - 163646. 643400 -00000 0.00 430.36 0.00 03603211900 8/3/01 - 8/30/01 PAGE 39 VCHR NET 178.82 760.00 7,518.32 2,147.29 2,147.29 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 188.19 29.00 26.88 29.00 30.00 430.36 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 40 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042087 04810397300 8/8- 9/10/01 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 426.88 0.00 426.88 04810397300 8/8/01 THRU 9/10/01 10041611 04502681700 8/6- 9/6/01 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 169.84 0.00 169.84 04502681700 8/6- 9/6/01 10042087 03901641100 8/01 - 8/31/01 001 - 156363 - 643400.00000 0.00 732.27 0.00 732.27 03901641100 8/01/01. 8/31/01 10042087 04810397400 8/8- 9/10/01 111 - 156332- 643400 -00000 0.00 1.44 0.00 1.44 04810397400 8/8/01 THRU 9/10/01 10041696 03902720800 7/31 - 8/30/01 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 200.26 0.00 200.26 03902720800 7/31 - 8/30/01 10042087 04602512600 8/7- 9/7/01 408 - 233351 - 643400 -00000 0.00 26.40 0.00 26.40 04602512600 8/7/01 THRU 9/7/01 10041696 03901641200 8/1- 8/31/01 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 50.09 0.00 50.09 03901641200 8/1- 8/31/01 10041611 04500642900 8/6- 9/6/01 111. 156332- 643400 -00000 0.00 188.00 0.00 188.00 04500642900 8/6- 9/6/01 10042087 04803311500 8/8- 9/11/01 111 - 156332. 643400 -00000 0.00 103.04 0.00 103.04 04803311500 8/8/01 THRU 9/11/01 10041696 03900149600 7/31 - 8/30/01 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 03900149600 7/31 - 8/30/01 10042110 04900602901 8/8- 9/5/01 408. 233351 - 643400 -00000 0.00 102.94 0.00 102.94 04900602901 8/8/01 THRU 9/5/01 10042087 04800002700 8/8. 9/10/01 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 40.80 0.00 40.80 048000002700 8/8/01 THRU 9/10/01 10041696 03904895300 7/31 - 8/30/01 001 - 156363 - 643400.00000 0.00 78.99 0.00 78.99 03904895300 7/31 - 8/30/01 10042087 04833302500 8/8- 9/11/01 111. 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 207.00 0.00 207.00 04833302500 8/8/01 THRU 9/11/01 10041696 03901644700 8/1- 8/31/01 001 - 156363. 643400 -00000 0.00 52.66 0.00 52.66 03901644700 8/1- 8/31/01 10042087 06102553000 7/20 - 8/17/01 001 - 061010 - 643400.00000 0.00 47.59 0.00 47.59 06102553000 7/20 - 8/17/01 10042087 05500353702 7/16- 8/16/01 001. 061010- 643400 -00000 0.00 82.27 0.00 82.27 05500353702 7/16- 8/16/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 41 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,267.90 CHECK NO 558693 VENDOR 330560 - COLLIER COUNTY WOMEN'S BAR ASSOC. 10041737 REGIST M COLLI 001 - 010510 - 654360 -00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 59197 REGIST M COLLI 10041737 REGIST E CHADWELL 001 - 010510 - 654360.00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 59197 REGIST E CHADWELL 10041738 REGIST D WEIGEL 9/26 001 - 010510- 654360 -00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 59200 REGIST D WEIGEL 9/26 10041737 REGIST K NELL 001 - 010510 - 654360 -00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 59197 REGIST K NELL 10041737 REGIST J ROBINSON 001 - 010510 - 654360 -00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 59197 REGIST J ROBINSON 10041737 REGIST H ASHTON 001 - 010510 - 654360 -00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 59197 REGIST H ASHTON 10041737 REGIST P WHITE 001 - 010510- 654360 -00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 59197 REGIST P WHITE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 126.00 CHECK NO 558079 VENDOR 3910 COLLIER HEALTH SERVICES 10042091 PHARMACY BILLING 001 - 155930 - 652710.00000 0.00 5,984.98 0.00 5,984.98 107753 PRESCRIPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,984.98 CHECK NO 558272 VENDOR 140770 COLLIER IRRIGATION SERVICE INC. 10039966 5230 001. 126334 - 646311 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 057869 CLEANED STUCK VALVE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 558685 VENDOR 329210 - COLLIER NEUROLOGIC NEUROLOGY 10041510 G,COOPERSMITH 08/27/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 71.50 0.00 71.50 08/27/01 G,COOPERSMITH 10042082 G.00OPERSMITH 9/5/01 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 96.85 0.00 96.85 107764 G.00OPERSMITH 9/5/01 10041510 C,CINTRON 05/16/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 386.75 0.00 386.75 05/16/01 C,CINTRON SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 42 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042082 L.CONLEY 8/31/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 591.50 0.00 591.50 107764 L.CONLEY 8/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.146.60 CHECK NO 558081 VENDOR 4120 - COLLIER SPORTS OFC ASSOC 10041795 MENS S BALL 9/11 -28 111 - 156341 - 634999 -00000 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 102564 OFFICIALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,000.00 CHECK NO 558436 VENDOR 224110 - COLLIER TEAM SPORTS 10041354 331439 681 - 431310 - 652990.00000 0.00 28.00 0.00 28.00 EMPLOYEE LOGO SHIRT 10039967 331441 001- 122240 - 652110 -00000 0.00 194.55 0.00 194.55 057830 CSW PCKT W /LOGO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 222.55 CHECK NO 558442 VENDOR 227020 - COLLIER TIRE & AUTO REPAIR 10039549 068667 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10041299 068869 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 60.70 0.00 60.70 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041301 69254 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 53.00 0.00 53.00 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041299 068694 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 285.08 0.00 285.08 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041301 69313 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 53.00 0.00 53.00 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10039549 068681 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 51.00 0.00 51.00 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10042084 069426 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 100065 TIRE SERVICES 10042084 069438 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 100065 TIRE SERVICES 10041298 68594 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 52.14 0.00 52.14 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 43 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041299 068732 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 42.75 0.00 42.75 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041299 068965 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 337.62 0.00 337.62 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041301 69171 521 - 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 51.00 0.00 51.00 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10039549 062942 521 - 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 31.75 0.00 31.75 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10039549 065775 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 79.75 0.00 79.75 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10041298 68378 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 215.07 0.00 215.07 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041299 069202 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 179.26 0.00 179.26 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041300 069200 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 28.30 0.00 28.30 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041301 68897 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 17.00 0.00 17.00 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041301 69010 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 155.90 0.00 155.90 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041300 069212 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 31.51 0.00 31.51 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10039042 68873 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 37.88 0.00 37.88 100066 TIRES 10041298 68580 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 39.71 0.00 39.71 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10039549 068857 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 53.00 0.00 53.00 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10041299 068941 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 208.32 0.00 208.32 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041300 69253 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 46.80 0.00 46.80 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041301 69051 521 - 122410. 646415 -00000 0.00 99.20 0.00 99.20 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041298 68691 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10039549 068706 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10041301 69167 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10039549 068648 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10041301 69227 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041301 69110 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041300 068898 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041301 69204 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10041299 068730 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10039549 068854 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10042084 069494 100065 TIRE SERVICES 10041301 68981 100065 SERVICE /REPAIRS 10039549 068696 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10039549 068646 100065 AUTO SERVICE 10041298 68621 107392 SERVICE /REPAIRS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 521 - 122410. 646415 -00000 521 - 122410. 646415 -00000 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 CHECK NO 558694 VENDOR 330810 - COLOR TEC COPY CENTER 10039540 4746 412 - 273511 - 651210 -70881 058457 DOOR HANGERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 [c�fil AMT NET VCHR DISC 96.03 0.00 51.00 0.00 86.25 129.70 65.00 53.00 37.72 29.75 60.70 51.00 53.00 86.45 18.00 112.54 0.00 171.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 PAGE 44 VCHR NET 96.03 51.00 86.25 129.70 65.00 53.00 37.72 29.75 60.70 51.00 53.00 86.45 18.00 112.54 171.00 3,505.88 180.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10039540 4747 058457 DOOR HANGERS 10041782 4799 059184 MEDIA PACKETS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA 16JI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 412. 273511- 651210 -70881 0.00 200.00 0.00 111. 156341- 651210 -00000 0.00 447.28 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558452 VENDOR 235530 - COLOR TEC COPY CNETER 74.00 10042081 4644 0.00 240.70 001 - 010510- 651210.00000 0.00 0.00 107713 COPIES /BEACHCOMBER 10039070 4707 111 - 156313 - 651210 -00000 0.00 101078 PRINTS,PAPER & SLIP SHEETS 10039962 4778 116 - 121830 - 647110 -33297 0.00 102022 COPIES 10041303 4802 320 - 183800. 651210 -00000 0.00 058819 COPIES 10039326 4749 113 - 138312 - 647110 -00000 0.00 100500 COPIES STAPLING 10042081 4750 001 - 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 107713 COPIES /STRAND CHECK NO 558499 VENDOR 260030 COLOR WHEEL PAINT 10039969 117032907 111 - 156334 - 646313 -00000 0.00 100822 PAINT CHECK NO 558668 VENDOR 326240 COLOR -TECH COPY CENTER 10039963 4779 470 - 173410 - 647110 -00000 0.00 103519 COPIES CHECK NO 558545 VENDOR 279050 COLORTECH 10039045 4748 111 - 156395 - 651210 -00000 0.00 107101 PRINTS 585.06 0.00 243.34 0.00 74.00 0.00 92.72 0.00 240.70 0.00 123.45 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 437.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 48.61 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 126.20 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 46 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558618 VENDOR 309030 COM -NET ERICSSON CRITICAL RADIO 10040911 0848839 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848161 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040908 0848154 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 618.75 0.00 618.75 100414 MAINT 10040911 0848846 188 - 140480. 646610 -00000 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848157 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848843 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848838 188 - 140480 - 646610.00000 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848155 188 - 140480- 646610 -00000 0.00 281.25 0.00 281.25 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848840 188- 140480. 646610 -00000 0.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848841 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848842 188. 140480- 646610 -00000 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848158 188 - 140480- 646610 -00000 0.00 168.75 0.00 168.75 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848844 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848845 188 - 140480. 646610 -00000 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848160 188- 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 337.50 0.00 337.50 100414 MAINTENANCE 10040911 0848156 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 337.50 0.00 337.50 100414 MAINTENANCE SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 47 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10040911 0848159 188 - 140480. 646610 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 100414 MAINTENANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,018.75 CHECK NO 558080 VENDOR 4020 COMBS OIL CO 10042079 14219 408 - 233312. 652410 -00000 0.00 95.55 0.00 95.55 101671 GEARLUBE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 95.55 CHECK NO 558476 VENDOR 250460 COMMERCIAL AIR MANAGEMENT, INC. 10041309 4738 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 210.00 0.00 210.00 57858 MOTORIZED DAMPER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 210.00 CHECK NO 558344 VENDOR 171310 - COMMERCIAL ENERGY SPECIALISTS INC. 10041784 59340 111 - 156349 - 646970 -00000 0.00 433.58 0.00 433.58 057818 POOL PUMP REPAIR 10042088 59000 306 - 116360 - 763100 -00169 0.00 450.00 0.00 450.00 58734 SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 883.58 CHECK NO 558218 VENDOR 115280 - COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTENANCE 10040914 994130 111 - 163646 - 634999.00000 0.00 257.17 0.00 257.17 100878 SERVICE 10041097 993485 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 217.38 0.00 217.38 100852 LABOR 10041097 994150 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 29.60 0.00 29.60 100852 SUPPLIES 10040164 994156 470. 173431 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.250.00 0.00 1,250.00 102360 LANDFILL MOWING 10041609 993839 111. 163646- 634999 -00000 0.00 2.704.00 0.00 2,704.00 100873 REPLACE PALMS 10040319 994164 150. 162545 - 634999 -00000 0.00 9,500.00 0.00 9,500.00 106395 - LAWN MAINTENANCE 10039974 994158 155 - 112593 - 763100 -00000 0.00 552.00 0.00 552.00 105202 LAWN MAINTENANCE SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 48 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041778 994153 111 - 163646. 634999 -00000 0.00 400.90 0.00 400.90 059181 REIMBURSEMENT 10040318 994157 111 - 163646. 634999 -00000 0.00 5.100.00 0.00 5,100.00 100872 - LAWN MAINTENANCE 10041609 993838 111 - 163646. 634999 -00000 0.00 616.00 0.00 616.00 100873 LABOR 10041097 994143 111 - 163646- 634999 -00000 0.00 1,316.21 0.00 1,316.21 100852 MULCH 10041615 993965 160 - 162518 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2,391.41 0.00 2.391.41 107546 LANDSCAPING 10040164 994156 470 - 173433 - 634999 -00000 0.00 750.00 0.00 750.00 102360 LANDFILL MOWING 10041777 993991 333 - 163650 - 634999 -60061 0.00 15.45 0.00 15.45 105204 REIMBURSEMENT 10041615 994166 160 - 162518- 634999.00000 0.00 12,935.54 0.00 12,935.54 107546 LANDSCAPING 10041595 994151 111 - 163646 - 634999.00000 0.00 190.95 0.00 190.95 100878 MATERIALS 10040317 994163 111 - 163646- 634999.00000 0.00 7,071.05 0.00 7,071.05 100876 - LAWN MAINTENANCE 10039972 994148 001 - 126334 - 634999.00000 0.00 906.50 0.00 906.50 107473 MULCH 10040164 994156 470 - 173432 - 634999 -00000 0.00 700.00 0.00 700.00 102360 LANDFILL MOWING 10041097 992755 111- 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,874.67 0.00 1,874.67 100852 LABOR 10041353 994126 001 - 126334 - 634999 -00000 0.00 230.00 0.00 230.00 SUPERVISOR LABOR TO MOW OPEN LOT 10040916 994152 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 54.00 0.00 54.00 100873 REIMBURSEMENT OF PARTS 10039975 994142 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 108.56 0.00 108.56 100852 MAINTENANCE 10040169 994162 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,345.48 0.00 1,345.48 100877 STREET SWEEPING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041615 994128 107546 LANDSCAPING 10040168 994165 106946 SIDE ROAD SERRVICING 10040316 994117 100705 - LAWN MAINTENANCE 10041615 993989 107546 LANDSCAPING 10041550 993671 104756 LANDSCAPING 10040915 994131 100706 SERVICE 10040917 994160 100832 SERVICE 10040163 994146 107474 REDO ROBERTS RANCH 10041615 994149 107546 LANDSCAPING 10041548 994159 100825 LANDSCAPING 10040314 994155 100851 - MAINTENANCE 10040167 994161 100858 ROAD MAINTENANCE 10041609 993801 100873 SOD INSTALL 10041312 994324 59083 LABOR 10041776 992591 100852 LANDSCAPING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 7,586.45 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 160 - 162518 - 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 152 - 162541 - 634999 -00000 0.00 160 - 162518 - 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 152 - 162541 - 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646. 634999 -00000 0.00 001 - 126334. 634999.00000 0.00 160 - 162518. 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 111. 163646- 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558288 VENDOR 150160 - COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTENANCE INC. 10041305 994169 111 - 163645 - 634999.00000 104954 LANDSCAPING AMT NET VCHR DISC 7,586.45 0.00 4,360.00 0.00 6,630.00 0.00 1,440.00 15,010.00 180.00 1,646.52 2,175.48 101.34 18,634.32 9,535.41 4,634.62 1,197.90 366.81 44.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,089.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 49 VCHR NET 7,586.45 4,360.00 6,630.00 1,440.00 15,010.00 180.00 1,646.52 2,175.48 101.34 18,634.32 9,535.41 4,634.62 1,197.90 366.81 44.75 124,060.47 3,089.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 50 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041305 994170 111 - 163645 - 634999 -00000 0.00 3,357.00 0.00 3,357.00 104954 LANDSCAPING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,446.00 CHECK NO 558511 VENDOR 263070 - COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 10039325 422005 101 - 163630 - 764210.00000 0.00 1,607.50 0.00 1,607.50 105435 PROGRAM RADIO /INSTALLATION 10039524 421690 490 - 144610 - 646910.00000 0.00 52.50 0.00 52.50 058360 INSTALL ANTENNA 10041787 422470 146 - 144380 - 646610.00000 0.00 142.80 0.00 142.80 059011 CHARGER SLEEVE 10041295 422442 101 - 163610 - 652910.00000 0.00 675.00 0.00 675.00 106841 VEHICLE CHARGER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,477.80 CHECK NO 558490 VENDOR 256240 - COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC 10042078 422103 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 27.00 0.00 27.00 058736 BELT CLIP 10042116 TW1117A 113 - 138915 - 764210.00000 0.00 8,381.00 113 - 138915 - 641950.00000 0.00 12.50 0.00 8.393.50 106910 RADIOS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8,420.50 CHECK NO 558414 VENDOR 211440 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORP. 10039784 260974501 408 - 210151 - 646910 -00000 0.00 1,438.04 0.00 1,438.04 101162 MAINTENANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,438.04 CHECK NO 558072 VENDOR 3530 CONDITIONED AIR CORP 10041311 081673 001 - 122240. 652997 -00000 0.00 465.78 0.00 465.78 059086 TIME CLOCK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 465.78 CHECK NO 558633 VENDOR 316330 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 10041779 01624802 001 - 122240. 652720 -00000 0.00 293.81 0.00 293.81 057885 GLOVES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558821 VENDOR 900050 - CONQUEST DEVELOPMENT USA 212668 283363 CONQUEST 346 - 156402 - 363990 -00000 0.00 CONQUEST 283363 0.00 212670 283363 CONQUEST 355 - 156190. 363992 -00000 10041590 CONQUEST 283363 0.00 212671 283363 CONQUEST 346 - 156402 - 363990 -00000 SERVICE CONQUEST 283363 10041596 212672 283363 CONQUEST 113. 000000- 209050 -00000 CONQUEST 283363 SERVICE ORDER 2731 212667 283363 CONQUEST 350 - 140470 - 363850 -00000 0.00 CONQUEST 283363 212669 283363 CONQUEST 381 - 110430- 363801.00000 10041602 CONQUEST 283363 0.00 CHECK NO 558203 VENDOR 111450 - CONSOLIDATED PLASTICS COMPANY INC. 10041783 4974610 111 - 156313 - 652910 -00000 058256 UTILITY TILT TRUCK CHECK NO 558554 VENDOR 281620 - CONSOLIDATED POWER SERVICES, INC. 10041466 210710 0.00 408 - 233352 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100462 SVC ORDER 2711 249.82 10041590 210711 0.00 408 - 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 101614 SERVICE 93.00 10041596 210700 0.00 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 100280 SERVICE ORDER 2731 2,479.82 10039591 210702 0.00 408 - 253221 - 634999.00000 100401 SERV FOR TELEMENTRY SYSTEM 493.80 10041602 210703 0.00 408- 233352 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100462 SERVICE 7/30/01 160.00 10041589 210706 0.00 408 - 253221. 634999 -00000 0.00 100401 SERVICE 2,011.84 16JI PAGE 51 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 293.81 0.00 571.02 0.00 571.02 0.00 214.00 0.00 214.00 0.00 249.82 0.00 249.82 0.00 1,234.00 0.00 1,234.00 0.00 93.00 0.00 93.00 0.00 117.98 0.00 117.98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,479.82 0.00 493.80 0.00 493.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 493.80 0.00 320.00 0.00 320.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 0.00 4,320.00 0.00 4,320.00 0.00 2,011.84 0.00 2,011.84 0.00 240.00 0.00 240.00 0.00 2,080.00 0.00 2,080.00 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10039544 210707 408 - 233352. 634999 -00000 0.00 280.00 0.00 100462 TELEMENTRY SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558202 VENDOR 110710 - CONSTANCE JOHNSON 10041306 PUBLIX LUNCH 8/13/01 113. 138900 - 649990 -00000 0.00 16.48 0.00 59008 PUBLIX LUNCH 8/13/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558781 VENDOR 343690 - CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS LTD, INC. 10041310 670857 313 - 163673 - 763100.66066 0.00 404.50 0.00 58603 CAULKING GUN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558515 VENDOR 264090 - CORMAC J. GIBLIN 10041462 9/20 MBA LUNCH C GIBLIN 191 - 138785- 654360.00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 9/20 MBA LUNCH C GIBLIN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558538 VENDOR 276650 CORPORATE EXPRESS 10039231 30373270001 001 - 100130 - 651110 -00000 0.00 60.72 0.00 058430 6 REAMS XEROX BRIGHT WHITE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558799 VENDOR 900030 CORY JOHNSON 212604 9/16 TRVL C JOHNSON 111 - 156313 - 640200 -00000 0.00 23.20 0.00 9/16 TRVL C JOHNSON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558692 VENDOR 330460 COUNTRY GRAPEVINE 10041601 4667 198. 157410. 648160 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 059148 DISPLAY AD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558786 VENDOR 343850 COUNTRY TECHNOLOGY, INC. 10041781 48279 111 - 156395 - 652910 -00000 0.00 303.10 0.00 057819 HEALTH EQUIPMENT 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558599 VENDOR 300830 - CRC INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING CORP 10039041 HUI5023 111 - 178980. 651910 -00000 0.00 248.00 0.00 058211 SEIKO LABEL PRINTER & LABELS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558682 VENDOR 328250 CREDIT DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 10041096 288512 001 - 157110 - 634999 -00000 0.00 234.00 0.00 100389 7/1 REPORT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558616 VENDOR 308630 CREEL TRACTOR, CO. 10039548 175802 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 86.06 0.00 100701 PARTS 10039548 175886 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 113.26 0.00 100701 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558082 VENDOR 4400 CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 10041720 206714 8/25/01 408 - 233350 - 652990 -00000 0.00 193.29 0.00 100566 BOTTLED WATER 8/25/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558540 VENDOR 278120 - CUSTOM WATER SYSTEMS 10041308 228146 001 - 122240 - 646284.00000 0.00 94.00 0.00 57886 SVC 7/01 10041308 228127 001 - 122240 - 646284 -00000 0.00 85.00 0.00 57886 SVC 7/01 10041785 228147 001 - 122240 - 646284 -00000 0.00 190.00 0.00 059094 PELLET SALT 10041308 228108 001 - 122240. 646284 -00000 0.00 213.00 0.00 57886 SVC 7/01 10041308 28247 001 - 122240. 646284 -00000 0.00 81.54 0.00 57886 SYSTEM CHK 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558822 VENDOR 900050 - D'JAMOOS /JERVLLE CONSTRUCTION 212629 285385 D'JAMOOS /JERVLLE 113 - 000000 - 115420.00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 D'JAMOOS /JERVLLE CONSTRUCTION 285385 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558362 VENDOR 181730 D. N. HIGGINS, INC. 10041175 4383 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70881 0.00 12,925.00 0.00 006685 STRAINERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558249 VENDOR 129710 D.N. HIGGINS INC. 10041176 4344 408 - 233351 - 646980 -00000 0.00 21.500.00 0.00 107147 MANHOLE REPLACEMENT 10039229 4381 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60171 0.00 24,875.00 0.00 107072 SERVICE CULVERT PIPE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558715 VENDOR 334860 - D.N. HIGGINS INC. 10041511 4381 325 - 172984. 763120 -31110 0.00 70,091.18 0.00 105584 INSTALL OF CDS UNIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558517 VENDOR 265700 - DADE PAPER COMPANY 8310109 369315 408 - 253211- 652510 -00000 0.00 111.50 0.00 101626 CLEANING SUPPLIES 10041789 294477 490 - 144610 - 652510 -00000 0.00 33.00 0.00 056756 WISK BROOMS 10039961 367547 408. 253221 - 652510 -00000 0.00 157.14 0.00 101690 CLEANING SUPPLIES 10041794 337322 111. 156332 - 652510 -00000 0.00 548.70 0.00 100613 CAN LINERS 10041791 359035 001. 156363- 652510 -00000 0.00 1,340.62 0.00 100667 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10039961 280538 101690 CREDIT 10041467 809591 107020 WORNG ORDER REF 365159 10041294 359170 106590 SUPPLIES 10041793 333292 106428 SUPPLIES 10041792 365159 107020 SUPPLIES 10039546 373934 101626 WASP SPRAY 10041788 369264 059178 BOTTLES 10041794 346694 100613 CAN LINERS 10039961 280539 101690 CREDIT CHECK NO 558688 VENDOR 329490 - DAN BOWMAN 10041569 8/19 -22 D BOWMAN 8/19 -22 D BOWMAN 10041569 9/9 -14 D BOWMAN 9/9 -14 D BOWMAN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408- 253221. 652510 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652720 -00000 0.00 111. 156395 - 652510 -00000 0.00 490. 144610 - 652510 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652720.00000 0.00 408 - 253211 - 652510.00000 0.00 490 - 144610- 652510 -00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 652510 -00000 0.00 408- 253221. 652510 -00000 0.00 490. 144610- 640300 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 640300 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558790 VENDOR 344030 - DAN RODRIGUEZ 10042041 TUITION REIMB 5/01 001 - 122240 - 654310 -00000 0.00 RODRIGUEZ TUITION REIMB 5/01 CHECK NO 558823 VENDOR 900050 - DANA HENRY 212600 REFUNDS PARKS HENRY 111 - 156380. 347990 -00000 0.00 HENRY REFUND ill AMT NET VCHR DISC 30.90- 0.00 30.90 14.50- 0.00 14.50 502.63 0.00 502.63 635.82 0.00 635.82 645.57 0.00 645.57 29.75 0.00 29.75 48.50 0.00 48.50 548.70 0.00 548.70 1.20- 0.00 1.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,555.33 75.00 0.00 75.00 117.00 0.00 117.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 192.00 430.08 0.00 430.08 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 430.08 36.00 0.00 36.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16JI PAGE 56 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 36.00 CHECK NO 558191 VENDOR 107880 - DARTEK COMPUTER SUPPLY CORP. 10039964 681601 111 - 138313. 641950 -00000 0.00 19.09 0.00 19.09 057267 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 10039964 681601 111 - 138313 - 651110 -00000 0.00 252.89 0.00 252.89 057267 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 10039964 681601 111 - 138313 - 641950 -00000 0.00 23.09 0.00 23.09 057267 SHIPPING 10039964 682146 111. 138313- 651110 -00000 0.00 124.95 0.00 124.95 057267 COMPUTER SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 420.02 CHECK NO 558551 VENDOR 281390 - DATA FLOW SYSTEMS INC 10041618 06476 414 - 263611 - 763100 -73922 0.00 25,780.00 0.00 25,780.00 106135 PUMP STATION 10041618 06427 414 - 263611 - 763100 -73922 0.00 39,180.00 0.00 39,180.00 106135 PUMP STATION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 64,960.00 CHECK NO 558602 VENDOR 302560 DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES 10042056 AB0000298054 001- 443010- 654110.00000 0.00 502.00 0.00 502.00 102116 5/01 BILLING 10042056 AB0000328339 001 - 443010 - 654110.00000 0.00 378.00 0.00 378.00 102116 7/01 BILLING 10042056 AB0000343345 001 - 443010- 654110.00000 0.00 331.00 0.00 331.00 102116 8/01 BILLING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,211.00 CHECK NO 558608 VENDOR 304510 DAVE SCHAFFER 10042093 8/15/01 001 - 156110 - 649990 -00000 0.00 5.090.00 0.00 5,090.00 107404 CHAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.090.00 CHECK NO 558324 VENDOR 165270 - DAVIDSON TITLES INC. SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10039542 23277 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 058759 CHILDRENS TITLES /SHIPPING CHECK NO 558695 VENDOR 330830 - DEANGELO BROTHERS 10042010 307 -2030 320 - 183800 - 634999 -00000 0.00 104160 - SERVICES THRU 8/24/01 0.00 10042010 307 -2030 (RETAINAGE) 320 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 7,000.00 104160 - SERVICES THRU 8/24/01 RTNGE 700.00- CHECK NO 558268 VENDOR 138670 - DEBBI MAXON 0.00 10041084 9/3 -14 TRVL D MAXON 123. 155973 - 640200 -33073 0.00 15.84 123 - 155975 - 640300 -33075 0.00 123 - 155980- 640200 -33080 0.00 40.60 CHECK TOTAL 123 - 155960 - 640200 -33060 0.00 9/3 -14 TRVL D MAXON CHECK NO 558383 VENDOR 193310 - DEHART ALARM SYSTEMS, INC. 10042076 10278 111 - 156332 - 634999 -00000 0.00 057822 SECURITY SYSTEM CHECK NO 558704 VENDOR 332420 - DELL COMPUTER CORP 10041773 646626796 111 - 138911 - 764900 -00000 0.00 107240 COMPUTER 10039971 644036527 113 - 138900- 764900 -00000 0.00 107190 COMPUTER 10039960 639097831 194 - 101540 - 764900 -00000 0.00 058536 COMPUTER CHECK NO 558489 VENDOR 256190 - DELL MARKETING L.P. 10041610 591933130 001 - 443010 - 651950 -00000 0.00 107502 SCANJET 16JI PAGE 57 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 281.95 11.28 0.00 293.23 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 293.23 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00 700.00- 0.00 700.00 - CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,300.00 0.52 15.84 1.04 23.20 0.00 40.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.60 495.00 0.00 495.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 495.00 2,996.00 0.00 2,996.00 1,253.00 0.00 1,253.00 44.00 0.00 44.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,293.00 432.00 0.00 432.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558083 VENDOR 4970 - DEMCO 10040418 448372 001 - 156140 - 764310.00000 0.00 1,500.00 001 - 156110- 641950.00000 0.00 172.52 0.00 106580 - SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558085 VENDOR 5240 - DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES. INC. 10041304 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 001 - 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 116.68 0.00 59032 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 10041304 D BONETA 8/20/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 74.43 0.00 59032 D BONETA 8/20/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558084 VENDOR 5190 - DIALOG INFORMATION SERVICES, INC. 10041786 19004122 001- 156110 - 634999 -00000 0.00 88.63 0.00 059159 DIAL UP SERVICE 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558824 VENDOR 900050 - DIANE SCHWART 212682 REFUND ADOPTION D,SCHWART 001 - 155410 - 346410 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 D,SCHWART REFUND ADOPTION 212683 REFUND ADOPTION D,SCHWART 610 - 155410. 346450.00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 D,SCHWART REFUND ADOPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558621 VENDOR 309990 - DIEGO'S SIGNS 10041509 4127 472 - 173422. 652990 -00000 0.00 450.00 0.00 LETTERING FOR DUMPSTERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558751 VENDOR 341960 - DIGITAL CAMERA CENTER 10040238 4382 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 1,189.70 0.00 107126 CAMERA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 59 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558327 VENDOR 165960 DISTRICT TWENTY 10038476 30TH PYMT 001 - 144710 - 634108 -00000 0.00 27,495.91 0.00 27,495.91 100793 30TH PYMT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 27,495.91 CHECK NO 558825 VENDOR 900050 DIVOSTA BLDG CORP. 212692 REF 288671 DIVOSTA 113 - 000000 - 115420.00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288671 DIVOSTA 212698 REF 288681 DIVOSTA 113 - 000000- 115420.00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288681 DIVOSTA 212700 REF 288678 DIVOSTA 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288678 DIVOSTA 212697 REF 288672 DIVOSTA 113 - 000000. 115420 -00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288672 DIVOSTA 212696 REF 288694 DIVOSTA 113 - 000000. 115420 -00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288694 DIVOSTA 212693 REF 288670 DIVOSTA 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288670 DIVOSTA 212699 REF 288679 DIVOSTA 113. 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288679 DIVOSTA 212694 REF 288675 DIVOSTA 113. 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288675 DIVOSTA 212702 REF 288676 DIVOSTA 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288676 DIVOSTA 212695 REF 288674 DIVOSTA 113 - 000000 - 115420.00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288674 DIVOSTA 212701 REF 288677 DIVOSTA 113 - 000000- 115420.00000 0.00 148.85 0.00 148.85 REF 288677 DIVOSTA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,637.35 CHECK NO 558826 VENDOR 900050 DIVOSTA BLDG. CORP 212641 287304 DIVASTA 001 - 000000. 115420 -00000 0.00 4,509.81 0.00 4,509.81 DIVASTA 287304 212628 287088 DIVASTA 001 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 505.81 0.00 505.81 DIVASTA 287088 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 60 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,015.62 CHECK NO 558360 VENDOR 180260 - DIXIE TRUCKING, INC. 10042077 63747 111 - 156332 - 646315 -00000 0.00 308.83 0.00 308.83 058731 STONE AND HAULING 10040162 63501 001 - 156363 - 646315 -00000 0.00 327.00 0.00 327.00 106996 SAND FOR DOMESTIC ANIMALS 10040162 63500 001 - 156363 - 646315 -00000 0.00 608.03 0.00 608.03 106996 SAND FOR DOMESTIC ANIMALS 10039970 63408 001 - 156363 - 646315 -00000 0.00 732.60 0.00 732.60 107065 SHELL AND HAULING (TIGERTAIL 10041313 63405 408 - 253212 - 649990.00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 58456 HAULING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.036.46 CHECK NO 558726 VENDOR 337250 - DMG- MAXIMUS 10041674 #1 (RETAINAGE) 001 - 000000 - 205100.00000 0.00 3,030.00- 0.00 3,030.00- 105816 THRU 8/31/01 (RETAINAGE) 10041674 #1 001 - 121810 - 634999.00000 0.00 30,300.00 0.00 30,300.00 105816 THRU 8/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 27,270.00 CHECK NO 558086 VENDOR 5270 - DOMESTIC CUSTOM METALS 10039783 10048 001 - 122240 - 649990 -00000 0.00 190.53 0.00 190.53 057862 LABOR & MATERIALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 190.53 CHECK NO 558184 VENDOR 106680 " - DON HUNTER, SHERIFF 10039809 A5330- 026160 001 - 061010. 643200 -00000 0.00 537.17 0.00 537.17 REIMB AMERIGAS 10039809 A5330- 026294 001 - 061010. 643200 -00000 0.00 533.22 0.00 533.22 REIMB AMERIGAS 10039809 A5330- 026194 001 - 061010. 643200 -00000 0.00 624.95 0.00 624.95 REIMB AMERIGAS 10039809 A5330- 026227 001 - 061010. 643200 -00000 0.00 738.50 0.00 738.50 REIMB AMERIGAS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 61 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10039809 A5330- 026264 001- 061010 - 643200 -00000 0.00 663.11 0.00 663.11 REIMB AMERIGAS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,096.95 CHECK NO 558672 VENDOR 326470 - DORA S. VIDAURRI 10041464 9/13,17 TRVL D VIDAURRI 001 - 138710 - 640200 -00000 0.00 48.72 0.00 48.72 9/13,17 TRVL D VIDAURRI CHECK TOTAL 0.00 48.72 CHECK NO 558827 VENDOR 900050 DOUG MISKIV 212608 REFUND PARKS D,MISKIV 111. 156390. 634999 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 D,MISKIV REFUND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 CHECK NO 558524 VENDOR 271130 DUTEC 10039973 84645 408 - 253212 - 646610 -00000 0.00 137.13 0.00 137.13 107445 UNIT REPAIRS 10039973 84648 408- 253212 - 646610.00000 0.00 509.60 0.00 509.60 107445 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 646.73 CHECK NO 558505 VENDOR 261490 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK 10042027 CO CT COSTS 8 /01 TRAF 681- 431590- 635700 -00000 0.00 750.00 0.00 750.00 CO CT COSTS 8/01 TRAF 10042027 CIR CT FINES 8/01 CRIM 681- 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 11,160.00 0.00 11,160.00 CIR CT FINES 8/01 CRIM 10042027 CO CRT COSTS 8/01 MISD 681 - 431590 - 635700 -00000 0.00 13,469.00 0.00 13,469.00 CO CRT COSTS 8/01 MISD 10042027 CIR CT COSTS 8/01 JUV 681 - 421190- 634401 -00000 0.00 3,121.00 0.00 3,121.00 CIR CT COSTS 8/01 JUV 10041095 CO COURT PROBATE 8/01 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 CO COURT PROBATE 8/01 10042027 CIR CT COSTS 8/01 FEL 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 7,939.00 0.00 7,939.00 CIR CT COSTS 8/01 FEL 10042027 CIR CT COSTS 8/01 CIV 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 9,075.00 0.00 9,075.00 CIR CT COSTS 8/01 CIV SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 62 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042027 CO CRT COSTS 8/01 CIV 681. 431590 - 635700 -00000 0.00 2,845.00 0.00 2,845.00 CO CRT COSTS 8/01 CIV 10042027 COL CO FINES 8/01 JUV 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 4,800.00 0.00 4,800.00 COL CO FINES 8/01 JUV CHECK TOTAL 0.00 55.459.00 CHECK NO 558040 VENDOR 166420 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 10041336 TAX DEED SALE 1997/1998 001 - 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 7,381.00 0.00 7,381.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,381.00 CHECK NO 558331 VENDOR 166490 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 10041856 PP #26 001 - 000000- 218800 -00000 0.00 1,913.79 0.00 1,913.79 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,913.79 CHECK NO 558332 VENDOR 166500 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 10041620 NSF FEES 9/17 -21/01 408. 000000- 206901 -00000 0.00 110.00 0.00 110.00 NSF FEES 9/17 -21/01 10041620 NSF FEES 9/17.21/01 001. 000000 - 206901.00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 NSF FEES 9/17.21/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 210.00 CHECK NO 558335 VENDOR 166510 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 10041774 2550963 473 - 173413 - 649030 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2550963 COPIES 10041774 2552245 001 - 010510. 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2552245 COPIES 10041774 2552583 473 - 173413 - 649030 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 2552583 COPIES 10039948 2536833 001. 010510- 651210 -00000 0.00 19.00 0.00 19.00 2536833 COPIES 10041094 2551907 191 - 138785 - 651210 -33752 0.00 51.00 0.00 51.00 2551907 RECORDING 10041774 2551649 473 - 173413 - 649030 -00000 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 2551649 COPIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 PAGE 63 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041774 2550043 001 - 010510- 651210 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 2550043 COPIES 10041598 2551746 113 - 138312 - 651210 -00000 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 2551746 COPIES 10039948 2536744 001 - 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 11.00 0.00 11.00 COPIES 10041790 2553695 408- 210105- 649030.00000 0.00 23.50 0.00 23.50 2553695 RECORDING 10039948 2534395 001 - 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 2534395 COPIES 10041603 2549912 001 - 122310. 651210 -00000 0.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 2549912 COPIES 10041603 2551380 001 - 122310 - 651210 -00000 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 2551380 COPIES 10041603 2553354 191. 138785- 651210 -33752 0.00 69.55 0.00 69.55 2553354 RECORDING 10041094 2551908 191 - 138785 - 651210 -33752 0.00 67.50 0.00 67.50 2551908 RECORDING 10041094 2551904 191 - 138785 - 651210.33752 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 2551904 RECORDING 10041774 2554919 113 - 138312 - 649030.00000 0.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 2554919 COPIES 10041790 2553698 408 - 210105 - 649030 -00000 0.00 29.00 0.00 29.00 2553698 RECORDING 10039948 2536293 001 - 010510. 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2536293 COPIES 10041774 2550465 001 - 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 106.00 0.00 106.00 2550465 COPIES 10041774 2553697 111 - 138911 - 649030 -00000 0.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 2553697 COPIES 10041603 2553327 191. 138785 - 651210 -33752 0.00 67.50 0.00 67.50 2553327 RECORDING 10041598 2553034 111 - 138911 - 651210 -00000 0.00 41.00 0.00 41.00 2553034 RECORDING SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 64 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041774 2554276 001 - 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 2554276 COPIES 10041774 2550970 001 - 010510. 651210 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 2550970 COPIES 10039948 2536777 001 - 010510- 651210 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 2536777 COPIES 10041094 2550902 191. 138785- 651210 -33752 0.00 67.50 0.00 67.50 2550902 RECORDING 10041598 2552857 111 - 138911 - 651210 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 2552857 COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 811.55 CHECK NO 558329 VENDOR 166220 - E. B. SIMMONDS 10041593 12665 408 - 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 938.43 0.00 938.43 101457 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 10041177 12682 101 - 163630. 646510 -00000 0.00 6,225.50 0.00 6,225.50 100479 SERVICES 10040910 12667 408 - 253212. 634999 -00000 0.00 287.00 0.00 287.00 100285 SERVICE AMD REPAIR 10040913 12669 322 - 183825 - 652990 -00000 0.00 356.84 0.00 356.84 100162 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 10040912 12668 778 - 182701- 634999 -00000 0.00 2,310.00 0.00 2,310.00 100162 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 10041591 12690 111 - 156332 - 652992 -00000 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 100606 BALLFIELD LIGHTS 10041177 12681 101- 163630 - 646510 -00000 0.00 1,077.80 0.00 1,077.80 100479 SERVICES 10041591 12686 111 - 156332 - 652992 -00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 100606 TOKEN MACHINE 10041177 12679 101 - 163630 - 646510 -00000 0.00 1,267.00 0.00 1,267.00 100479 SERVICES 10040909 12666 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2,397.17 0.00 2,397.17 100402 SERVICE AND REPAIR 10041593 12691 408. 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 286.00 0.00 286.00 101457 ELECTRIC REPAIRS 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10040912 12668 778 - 182701 - 652990 -00000 0.00 571.56 0.00 100162 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 10040913 12669 322 - 183825 - 634999.00000 0.00 600.00 0.00 100162 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558623 VENDOR 310300 - EAGLE RAY DIVE CENTER 10039547 9847 117 - 178280.652990 -00000 0.00 89.94 0.00 103425 ARTIFICIAL REEF SUPPLIES 10039547 9875 117 - 178280 - 652990 -00000 0.00 253.83 0.00 103425 ARTIFICIAL REEF SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558568 VENDOR 284990 - EARLY CHILDHOOD DIRECT 10041962 M50444700103 111 - 156390- 652910 -00000 0.00 1.98 0.00 059185 DISCOUNT ERROR 10041962 M50444700101 111 - 156390 - 652910 -00000 0.00 12.49 0.00 059185 DISCOUNT ERROR 10041962 M50444700102 111 - 156390 - 652910 -00000 0.00 3.59 0.00 059185 DISCOUNT ERROR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558705 VENDOR 333010 EARTHLINK INC. 10041617 66094910 129. 156110 - 634999 -33014 0.00 153.65 0.00 104727 LIBRARY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558415 VENDOR 211540 ECKERD DRUG CO. 10042092 MONTH ENDING 9/1/01 001 - 155930 - 652710 -00000 0.00 5,995.64 0.00 107751 SERVICE 9/1/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558421 VENDOR 214040 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 10041614 00 -26 001 - 138710 - 882100 -00000 0.00 6,215.09 0.00 100430 9/6- 9/19/01 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558800 VENDOR 900030 EDDIE MARTIN 212603 9/5 TRVL E MARTIN 313 - 163611 - 640300 -00000 0.00 9.00 0.00 9/5 TRVL E MARTIN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558233 VENDOR 122900 EDUARDO R. HUERGO, M.D. 10041592 J COWDREY 8/13/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 126.75 0.00 59033 J COWDREY 8/13/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558350 VENDOR 174350 - ELITE FIRE & SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC 10039069 17038 146. 144380 - 652110 -00000 0.00 4,690.00 0.00 107230 BUNKER GEAR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558506 VENDOR 261550 - ELIZABETH MINDOR 10041960 3 1/2 HRS 9/13/01 681- 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 56.00 0.00 3 1/2 HRS 9/13/01 MINDOR 10041960 112 HR 9/13/01 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 8.00 0.00 1/2 HR 9/13/01 MINDOR 10041960 4 HRS 9/12/01 681- 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 64.00 0.00 4 HRS 9/12/01 MINDOR 10041960 2 HRS 9/12/01 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 2 HRS 9/12/01 MINDOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558212 VENDOR 114800 ELLIS K. PHELPS & COMPANY 10042080 055890 408 - 233351 - 655100 -00000 0.00 661.50 0.00 101204 MEMBRANE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558377 VENDOR 190020 ELSIE GONZALEZ 10041961 6.5 HRS 9/10/01 681 - 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 104.00 0.00 6.5 HRS 9/10/01 GONZALEZ 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558662 VENDOR 324180 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 10039968 INV224082 490.144610- 652720 -00000 0.00 483.80 0.00 107019 GLOVES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558186 VENDOR 106740 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES 10041594 APP FOR VEHICLE PERMIT 490.144610- 649010 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 59149 APPLICATION FEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558566 VENDOR 284520 ENGLE HOMES OF SOUTHWEST FLA., INC. 10041951 288039 ENGLE HOMES 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 1,872.00 0.00 ENGLE HOMES 288039 10041951 284516 ENGLE HOMES 113 - 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 176.28 0.00 ENGLE HOMES 284516 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558223 VENDOR 116820 ENTREE COMPUTER CENTER 10039541 100624 408- 210151 - 652990 -00000 0.00 125.00 0.00 058781 FUSER LASERJET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558776 VENDOR 343590 - EPSILON SIGMA PHI 10041314 2002 001 - 157110- 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 59026 EPSILON SIGMA PHI DUES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558739 VENDOR 339540 - ERIC FADDEN 10041307 1001 001 - 144210 - 634999 -00000 0.00 175.00 0.00 56953 OPS /CHEMICAL SPILL 7122101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558521 VENDOR 269730 - EUGENIO HERRERA 10041597 W JOHNSON 9/01 RENT 001 - 155930 - 634153 -00000 0.00 320.00 0.00 W JOHNSON 9/01 RENT 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558088 VENDOR 6120 EVANS OIL COMPANY 10042085 761 AUGUST 2001 STMT 521 - 122450 - 652410.00000 0.00 48.76 0.00 106593 FUEL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558702 VENDOR 332090 EVERLOVE AND ASSOCIATES INC. 10042106 LIBRARY SERVICE 08/01 001 - 443010 - 634999 -00000 0.00 23.50 0.00 104440 LIBRARY SERVICE 08/10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558725 VENDOR 337120 - EXETER ARCHITECURAL PRODUCTS 10040315 IHPI10414001 -R 118 - 144210. 762200 -33294 0.00 10,764.46 0.00 106279 - STORM SHUTTERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558424 VENDOR 214900 - F.P.L. 10041579 32426 -54246 8/2- 8/31/01 408 - 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 13,153.27 0.00 32426 -54246 8/2- 8/31/01 10041612 48425 -34572 8/20- 9/19/01 408 - 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9,523.57 0.00 48425 -34572 8/20- 9/19/01 10041580 32536 -07331 8/2- 8/31/01 408. 233351- 643100 -00000 0.00 14,564.64 0.00 32536 -07331 8/2- 8/31/01 10041844 02776 -08089 8/15- 9/14/01 001. 061010 - 643100 -00000 0.00 34,011.04 0.00 02776 -08089 8/15- 9/14/01 10041508 30204 -30389 8/2- 8/31/01 408. 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 2,460.62 0.00 30204 -30389 8/2- 8/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558828 VENDOR 900050 FABRI TECH SCREEN ENCLOSURES 212645 REF 57978 FABRI TECH 113- 000000 - 115420.00000 0.00 0.64 0.00 FABRI TECH REF 57978 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558510 VENDOR 262560 FAERBER & CLIFF SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041209 AUGUST 2001 105871 AUGUST 2001 LEGAL SVS. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681- 421190 - 631020.00000 0.00 681 - 421190 - 631025.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558775 VENDOR 343570 - FAPPO, C/O ALAN WEAVER, CPPB VCHR NET 10041606 REGIST L WOOD 10/26 001 - 121710. 654360 -00000 0.00 0.00 59052 REGIST L WOOD 10/26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558432 VENDOR 220990 - FASHION FRESH 40.00 10041479 8/1- 8/31/01 001. 122255 - 634999 -00000 0.00 0.00 100374 UNIFORM CLEANING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558089 VENDOR 6250 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 5.55 10041001 5- 933.37349 001 - 144210 - 641950 -00000 0.00 0.00 100947 SHIPPING 8.35 0.00 10040995 5- 919 -47157 101 - 163612 - 641950 -00000 0.00 5.55 SHIPPING CHARGES 5.55 40.95 10040278 5- 897 -61466 408 - 210105. 641950 -00000 0.00 11.45 100238 - SHIPPING 8/28/01 0.00 7.85 10040998 5- 897 -89194 408 - 210105. 641950 -00000 0.00 100238 SHIPPING 10040283 5- 933 -10862 408. 210151 - 641950 -00000 0.00 101348 - SHIPPING 8/28 10040289 5- 905 -48992 413. 263611- 641950 -73949 0.00 58585 - SHIPPING 8/31 10041000 5- 933 -36693 681 - 421510 - 641950 -00000 0.00 100759 SHIPPING 10040994 5- 909 -61149 001- 100130 - 641950 -00000 0.00 SHIPPING CHARGES 10041000 5- 933.08556 681 - 421510 - 641950 -00000 0.00 100759 SHIPPING 16JI PAGE 69 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 15,850.00 0.00 0.00 15,850.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15,850.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.00 379.64 0.00 379.64 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 379.64 5.55 0.00 5.55 18.85 0.00 18.85 5.55 0.00 5.55 8.35 0.00 8.35 7.85 0.00 7.85 5.55 0.00 5.55 40.95 0.00 40.95 11.45 0.00 11.45 7.85 0.00 7.85 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 111.95 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 1,080.91 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558346 VENDOR 172870 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 10040280 5 -938 -49286 001. 000000- 142900 -00000 0.00 101201 - SHIPPING 8/28 10040999 5- 919 -46730 001 - 138710- 641950 -00000 0.00 100406 SHIPPING 10041004 5. 905.61273 111 - 156341 - 641950.00000 0.00 101276 SHIPPING 10040281 5- 913 -27031 470 - 173410 - 641950 -00000 0.00 101269 - SHIPPING 8/28 10040284 5- 911 -30274 123 - 155975. 641950 -33075 0.00 106979 - SHIPPING 8/28 10041003 5- 913 -54945 470 - 173410 - 641950 -00000 0.00 101269 EXPRESS SHIPPING 10041002 5- 938 -77027 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 101201 SHIPPING 10040282 5- 905 -33436 111 - 156341- 641950 -00000 0.00 101276 - SHIPPING 8/28 10040284 5- 911 -59009 123. 155975 - 641950.33075 0.00 106979 - SHIPPING 9/4 10040279 5. 919.18537 001 - 138710 - 641950 -00000 0.00 100406 - SHIPPING 8/28 10040997 5. 911.56900 109 - 182601 - 641950 -00000 0.00 100156 SHIPPING CHECK NO 558785 VENDOR 343830 - FERGUSON PUBLISHING COMPANY 59168 INV727952 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 059168 ENCY /CARR &VOC GUIDE 4 -V 11TH CHECK NO 558182 VENDOR 105760 - FERGUSON UNDERGROUND 10041204 820218 408. 253212 - 655100 -00000 100216 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10042069 825739 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 101826 PARTS /PIPE /SUPPLIES 16JI PAGE 70 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 37.70 7.50 35.40 11.00 5.55 35.80 9.25 21.80 7.75 38.85 14.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 166.90 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.70 7.50 35.40 11.00 5.55 35.80 9.25 21.80 7.75 38.85 14.00 224.60 166.90 166.90 0.00 2,915.45 0.00 2,915.45 0.00 1,080.91 0.00 1,080.91 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041205 829532 408 - 253212 - 764180 -00000 0.00 2.440.00 0.00 2,440.00 107162 3 M LOCATOR 10041204 820218 -1 408. 253212- 655100 -00000 0.00 1,581.00 0.00 1,581.00 100216 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041203 823897 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 41.45 0.00 41.45 100217 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041203 824450 408- 253212 - 655100.00000 0.00 166.96 0.00 166.96 100217 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041503 824526 -2 414 - 263611 - 655100 -74023 0.00 7,400.00 0.00 7,400.00 106387 FIRE HYDRANTS 10040135 821349 408 - 253212 - 764180 -00000 0.00 3,420.00 0.00 3,420.00 106671 - PARTS 10042032 828023 408. 210130. 655200 -00000 0.00 6.72 0.00 6.72 101420 PIPE 10041203 CM039733 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 1,281.60- 0.00 1,281.60 100217 CREDIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17,770.89 CHECK NO 558374 VENDOR 187990 - FES 10040311 SEALS 001 - 172910 - 631400 -00000 0.00 107.50 0.00 107.50 57629 - SEAL FOR J.BOLDT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 107.50 CHECK NO 558318 VENDOR 163730 - FIBBER MCGEE'S CLOSET 10041502 3379 G -0043 10 /01 111. 156341 - 644170 -00000 0.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 101266 G -0043 10 /01 RENT 10041502 3379 G -0045 10 /01 130 - 157710 - 644170 -00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 101266 G -0045 10 /01 RENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 215.00 CHECK NO 558760 VENDOR 343000 - FINOMRO 10040292 9380112783 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 247.71 0.00 247.71 58460 - FACE SHIELD BRACKETS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 247.71 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558423 VENDOR 214800 - FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC 10041964 15951 001. 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 102235ANNUAL INSPEC /CERT FIRE ALARMS 10041009 16170 001 - 122240 - 646281.00000 0.00 104572 BACKFLOW INSPECTIONS 10041964 16016 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 102235ANNUAL INSPEC /CERT FIRE ALARMS 10041964 16008 001 - 122240. 646281 -00000 0.00 102235ANNUAL INSPEC /CERT FIRE ALARMS 10041964 16009 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 102235ANNUAL INSPEC /CERT FIRE ALARMS 10041964 16072 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 102235ANNUAL INSPEC /CERT FIRE ALARMS CHECK NO 558548 VENDOR 280030 - FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTION 10041504 10474280 473 - 173413 - 652990 -00000 106801 REALTY ATLAS MAPS /COLLIER CO. 10040988 10460362 313 - 163611 - 634999 -00000 313 - 163611. 641950 -00000 107485 COLLIER FL AERIAL MAO BOOK 10041967 10473920 111- 156332. 654110 -00000 107718 COLLIER FL AERIAL MAP BK. CHECK NO 558607 VENDOR 303710 - FIRST ANESTHESIA ASSOC INC 10040987 R,CADET 08102101 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 702.00 107610 R,CADET 08/02/01 702.00 10040987 G,COOPERSMITH 08/24/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 574.60 107610 G,COOPERSMITH 08/24/01 159.25 10040987 J,CERVANTER 08/01/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 107610 J,CERVANTES 08/01/01 10040987 R,NAVARRO 09/04/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 107610 R,NAVARRO 09/04/01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16JI PAGE 72 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET B36.00 90.00 1,054.00 498.00 600.00 1,454.80 CHECK TOTAL 1,351.30 1,137.40 34.62 995.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 836.00 90.00 1,054.00 498.00 600.00 1,454.80 4.532.80 1,351.30 1,172.02 995.00 3,518.32 0.00 338.00 0.00 338.00 0.00 702.00 0.00 702.00 0.00 574.60 0.00 574.60 0.00 159.25 0.00 159.25 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558503 VENDOR 261220 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NAPLES 10041875 PP #26 001 - 000000- 218910 -00000 0.00 76.56 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558222 VENDOR 116470 FIRST TITLE & ABSTRACT. INC. 10041488 01 -TC -3734 (B- 11858) 313 - 163673 - 631650 -60171 0.00 100.00 0.00 059050 UPDATE TOWER RD /ROOKERY BAY 10040307 811406,11418,11423,11424 331 - 163650. 631650 -60054 0.00 200.00 0.00 58562 - TITLE SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558642 VENDOR 318400 FIRST UNION FINANCIAL 10041858 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 216210 -00000 0.00 121.77 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558394 VENDOR 197290 FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK 10041859 PP #26 001 - 000000- 216210 -00000 0.00 184.80 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558461 VENDOR 241800 FISHKIND & ASSOCIATES 10041506 10630 001- 100190- 634999 -00000 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 106537 CONSULTING SVS. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558576 VENDOR 288620 - FLA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY 10041798 2 -1.02- 3236 -1 -1 8/13 -9/13 408 - 210105 - 643400 -00000 0.00 217.58 0.00 2 -1.02- 3236 -1 -1 8/13- 9/13/01 10042033 2 -1 -03- 1970 -2 -2 8/15 -9/18 111. 156332- 643400 -00000 0.00 17.33 0.00 2 -1 -03- 1970 -2 -2 8/15 - 9/18/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 74 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558531 VENDOR 273880 - FLASH EQUIPMENT, INC. 10040469 25486 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 628.36 0.00 628.36 100127 PARTS 10040469 25401 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 8.48 0.00 8.48 100127 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 636.84 CHECK NO 558043 VENDOR 184860 - FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING, 10040150 REGISTRATION J. CLEMMENTS 113 - 138915 - 640300 -00000 0.00 265.00 0.00 265.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 265.00 CHECK NO 558369 VENDOR 184860 - FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF PLUMBING, 10041582 W.ASHBY DUES 113 - 138915 - 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 059139 W.ASHBY DUES 10041582 R.NOONAN DUES 113. 138915 - 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 059139 R.NOONAN DUES 10041582 R.CAIAllO DUES 113 - 138915. 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 059139 R.CAIAllO DUES 10041582 A.CEFALO DUES 113 - 138915 - 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 059139 A.CEFALO DUES 10041582 H.NEVINS DUES 113. 138915- 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 059139 H.NEVINS DUES 10041582 J.KERRIGAN DUES 113 - 138915. 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 059139 J.KERRIGAN DUES 10041582 P.NARGI DUES 113 - 138915 - 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 059139 P.NARGI DUES 10041582 R.SCHMIDT DUES 113. 138915 - 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 059139 R.SCHMIDT DUES 10041582 J.TURNER DUES 113 - 138915. 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 059139 J.TURNER DUES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 450.00 CHECK NO 558470 VENDOR 248020 - FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 75 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042030 G.OSTERVAL 5/3/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 198.90 0.00 198.90 107766 G.OSTERVAL 5/3/01 10040986 G,OSTERVAL 06/14/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 110.50 0.00 110.50 107613 G,OSTERVAL 06/14/01 10040986 A,DURAN 06/29/01 001 - 155930- 631210.00000 0.00 4.55 0.00 4.55 107613 A,DURAN 06/29/01 10040986 J,MARTINEZ 08/15/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 78.65 0.00 78.65 107613 J,MARTINEZ 08/15/01 10040986 M,WALDEN 06/07/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 168.35 0.00 168.35 107613 M,WALDEN 06/07/01 10040986 A,MENDO 07/06/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107613 A,MENDO 07/06/01 10040986 M,WALDEN 06/07/01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107613 M,WALDEN 06/07/01 10042030 G.OSTERVAL 3/19/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 327.60 0.00 327.60 107766 G.OSTERVAL 3/19/01 10040986 A,HUNT 08/14/01 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 51.35 0.00 51.35 107613 A,HUNT 08/14/01 10040986 M,WALDEN 06/07/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 4.55 0.00 4.55 107613 M,WALDEN 06/07/01 10040986 M,WALDEN 06/07/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 75.40 0.00 75.40 107613 M,WALDEN 06/07/01 10040986 G.OSTERVAL 06/11/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 55.90 0.00 55.90 107613 G,OSTERVAL 06/11/01 10042030 G.OSTERVAL 4/10/01 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107766 G.OSTERVAL 4/10/01 10040986 L,JONES 06/05/01 001- 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 168.35 0.00 168.35 107613 L,JONES 06/05/01 10040986 A,HUNT 06/08/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107613 A,HUNT 06/08/01 10040986 L,JONES 06/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 55.90 0.00 55.90 107613 L,JONES 06/26/01 10040986 A,MENDO 07/6/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 57.20 0.00 57.20 107613 A,MENDO 07/06/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I 6 J I PAGE 76 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042030 A.HUNT 9/4/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107766 A.HUNT 9/4/01 10040986 A,HUNT 06/05/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 55.90 0.00 55.90 107613 A,HUNT 06/05/01 10040986 A,HUNT 07/13/01 001. 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 51.35 0.00 51.35 107613 A,HUNT 07/13/01 10040986 J,HUNT 06/05/01 001. 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107613 J,HUNT 06/05/01 10040986 A,MENDO 07/06/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 168.35 0.00 168.35 107613 A,MENDO 07/06/01 10042030 G.OSTERVAL 4/10/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 55.90 0.00 55.90 107766 G.OSTERVAL 4/10/01 10040986 J.TRACEY 06/04/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107613 J,TRACY 06/04/01 10040986 A,DURAN 06/29/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107613 A,DURAN 06/29/01 10040986 J,TRACY 06/04/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 66.95 0.00 66.95 107613 J,TRACY 06/04/01 10042030 G.OSTERVAL 3/19/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 6.50 0.00 6.50 107766 G.OSTERVAL 3/19/01 10040986 A,MENDO 07/17/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 35.75 0.00 35.75 107613 A,MENDO 07/17/01 10040986 J,TRACY 06/04/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 4.55 0.00 4.55 107613 J,TRACY 06/04/01 10042030 A.HUNT 9/4/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 55.90 0.00 55.90 107766 A.HUNT 9/4/01 10040986 J,TRACY 07/16/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 78.65 0.00 78.65 107613 J,TRACY 07/16/01 10040986 A,HUNT 06/08/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 55.90 0.00 55.90 107613 A,HUNT 06/08/01 10040986 G,OSTERVAL 06/11/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107613 G,OSTERVAL 06/11/01 10040986 L,JONES 06/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 107613 L,JONES 06/26/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10040986 G,OSTERVAL 08120101 107613 G.OSTERVAL 08/20/01 10042030 G.OSTERVAL 5/3/01 107766 G.OSTERVAL 5/3/01 10040986 A,MENDO 07/06/01 107613 A,MENDO 07/06/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10040989 A.KORTI DUES 10/01 -9/02 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 107519 A.KORTI DUES 10/01 -9/02 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 M.RILEY DUES 10/01 -9/02 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 37.70 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 4.55 0.00 101- 163630 - 654210 -00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558301 VENDOR 158730 - FLORIDA DEPT OF EDUCATION 10041874 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 218900 -00000 PP #26 CHECK NO 558090 VENDOR 6670 - FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY 10040989 A.KORTI DUES 10/01 -9/02 313 - 163611 - 654210 -00000 107519 A.KORTI DUES 10/01 -9/02 10040989 M.RILEY DUES 10/01 -9/02 313 - 163611 - 654210 -00000 107519 M.RILEY DUES 10/01.9/02 10040989 D.BATHON DUES 10/01 -9/02 313 - 163611. 654210 -00000 107519 D.BATHON DUES 10/01 -9/02 10041486 Z.YU DUES 10/01 -9/02 101- 163630 - 654210 -00000 058858 Z.YU DUES 10/01 -9/02 10040989 A.RUTH DUES 10/01 -9/02 313. 163611 - 654210 -00000 107519 A.RUTH DUES 10/01 -9/02 10041799 T.KUCK DUES 10/01 -9/02 113 - 138312. 654210 -00000 059134 T.KUCK DUES 10/01.9/02 10040989 S.MILLER DUES 10/01.9/02 313. 163611 - 654210.00000 107519 S.MILLER DUES 10/01 -9/02 CHECK NO 558395 VENDOR 198080 - FLORIDA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 10040288 6/9 AD FOR MUSEUM ASSTNT 198 - 157430. 648160 -00000 58786 - AD FOR MUSEUM ASSISTANT 0.00 85.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 258.00 258.00 258.00 258.00 258.00 283.00 258.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 77 VCHR NET 37.70 11.70 4.55 2,163.85 85.00 85.00 258.00 258.00 258.00 258.00 258.00 283.00 258.00 1,831.00 100.00 100.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 78 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558588 VENDOR 294600 - FLORIDA IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC 10040291 368283 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 121.22 0.00 121.22 57469 SPRINKLER PARTS 10041968 360861 408 - 233351 - 646311 -00000 0.00 499.48 0.00 499.48 100989 SPRINKLER PARTS 10041198 362267 111 - 156332 - 646311 -00000 0.00 86.25 0.00 86.25 100589 SPRINKLER PARTS 10041491 370592 109 - 182901 - 641950 -00000 0.00 28.50 0.00 28.50 058823 FREIGHT CHARGES 10040312 368285 150 - 162545 - 646311 -00000 0.00 224.92 0.00 224.92 58833 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES 10041198 368284 111 - 156332 - 646311 -00000 0.00 139.70 0.00 139.70 100589 SPRINKLER PARTS 10041198 363018 111 - 156332 - 646311.00000 0.00 446.76 0.00 446.76 100589 SPRINKLER PARTS 10041802 370593 111 - 156332 - 646311 -00000 0.00 102.10 0.00 102.10 100589 SPRINKLER PARTS 10041802 370597 111 - 156332 - 646311.00000 0.00 225.73- 0.00 225.73- 100589 CREDIT 10041802 370594 111. 156332 - 646311 -00000 0.00 186.58 0.00 186.58 100589 SPRINKLER PARTS 10041198 365323 111 - 156332. 646311 -00000 0.00 117.48 0.00 117.48 100589 SPRINKLER PARTS 10041802 370594 111- 156332 - 646311.00000 0.00 3.73- 0.00 3.73- 100589 DISCOUNT 10041199 373769 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 0.00 60.60 0.00 60.60 101388 IRRIGATION PARTS 10041802 370593 111 - 156332 - 646311 -00000 0.00 2.04- 0.00 2.04- 100589 DISCOUNT 10041198 369275 111 - 156332 - 646311 -00000 0.00 194.63 0.00 194.63 100589 SPRINKLER PARTS 10041199 373769 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 0.00 1.21- 0.00 1.21- 101388 DISCOUNT SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558093 VENDOR 6790 - FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 10042029 73965 -45530 8/21- 9/20/01 408. 233313 - 643100 -00000 73965 -45530 8/21. 9/20/01 10041578 56244 -74077 8/1. 8/30/01 408 - 253221 - 643100 -00000 56244 -74077 8/1. 8/30/01 10041196 02368.36284 8/8- 9/7/01 470 - 173435 - 643100 -00000 02368 -36284 8/8- 9/7/01 10041196 02968 -36240 8/8- 9/7/01 470. 173435 - 643100 -00000 02968 -36240 8/8- 9/7/01 10042029 90849 -80235 8/21- 9/20/01 408 - 233313. 643100 -00000 90849 -80235 8/21- 9/20/01 10041196 41285.39279 8/8- 9/7/01 470 - 173441 - 643100 -00000 41285 -39279 8/8- 9/7/01 10041578 85548 -42446 8/15- 9/14/01 188 - 140480 - 643100 -00000 85548 -42446 8/15- 9/14/01 10041771 98397 -98049 8/15- 9/14/01 408 - 233313. 643100 -00000 98397 -98049 8/15- 9/14/01 10041196 73547 -83560 8/13- 9/12/01 408 - 233312 - 643100 -00000 73547 -83560 8/13- 9/12/01 10041196 82797 -60329 8/8- 9/7/01 101. 163610 - 643100 -00000 82797 -60329 8/8- 9/7/01 10041578 47877 -28106 8/8- 9/7/01 113 - 138900. 643100 -00000 47877 -28106 8/8- 9/7/01 10041578 07782 -51314 8/8- 9/7/01 490 - 144610 - 643100.00000 001 - 144510 - 643100 -00000 001 - 061010 - 643100 -00000 07782 -51314 8/8- 9/7/01 10041196 29113 -35137 8/6- 9/5/01 408- 253212. 643100 -00000 29113 -35137 8/6- 9/5/01 10042029 25211 -69579 8/20- 9/19/01 408 - 233313 - 643100.00000 25211 -69579 8/20- 9/19/01 10042029 63291 -11170 8/21- 9/20/01 408 - 233313 - 643100 -00000 63291 -11170 8/21- 9/20/01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 23.46 57,226.01 87.41 9.32 12.78 96.88 580.99 35.51 9.09 446.09 18.55 112.72 313.10 200.38 734.34 35.36 8,812.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 79 VCHR NET 1,975.51 23.46 57,226.01 87.41 9.32 12.78 96.88 580.99 35.51 9.09 446.09 18.55 626.20 734.34 35.36 8.812.83 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 PAGE 80 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041578 01458 -36201 8/8- 9/7/01 113 - 138900 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9,681.48 0.00 9,681.48 01458 -36201 8/8- 9/7/01 10041196 73952 -39168 8/14- 9/13/01 154 - 172520 - 643100 -00000 0.00 57.65 0.00 57.65 73952 -39168 8/14- 9/13/01 10041578 63316 -84552 8/8- 9/7/01 669 - 100220 - 643100.00000 0.00 205.53 0.00 205.53 63316.84552 8/8- 9/7/01 10041771 40357 -28403 8/16- 9/17/01 408 - 233313 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 40357 -28403 8/16- 9/17/01 10042029 84554 -61122 8/17. 9/18/01 408 - 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 84554 -61122 8/17. 9/18/01 10041196 08707 -89229 8/8. 9/7/01 101 - 163610 - 643100 -00000 0.00 524.70 0.00 524.70 08707 -89229 8/8. 9/7/01 10041196 43730 -78221 8/8- 9/7/01 101- 163610 - 643100 -00000 0.00 493.38 0.00 493.38 43730 -78221 8/8- 9/7/01 10041771 46281 -90284 8/8- 9/7/01 473. 173413- 643100 -00000 0.00 698.31 0.00 698.31 46281 -90284 8/8- 9/7/01 10041196 42093 -33287 8/7- 9/6/01 101 - 163630. 643100 -00000 0.00 9.27 0.00 9.27 42093 -33287 8/7. 9/6/01 10042029 10772.42160 8/17- 9/18/01 414 - 263611 - 643100 -74125 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 10772 -42160 8/17- 9/18/01 10041771 55109 -29473 8/15. 9/14/01 408. 233313- 643100 -00000 0.00 35.36 0.00 35.36 55109 -29473 8/15- 9/14/01 10041196 70747 -88212 8/13- 9/12/01 408 - 233312- 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 70747 -88212 8/13 - 9/12/01 10041578 74037.36130 8/10- 9/11/01 134 - 172530 - 643100.00000 0.00 42.21 0.00 42.21 74037.36130 8/10- 9/11/01 10041578 58478 -43348 8/7- 9/6/01 188 - 140480 - 643100 -00000 0.00 804.87 0.00 804.87 58478 -43348 8/7- 9/6/01 10042029 03677 -75210 8/20- 9/19/01 408 - 233312- 643100 -00000 0.00 20,501.62 0.00 20,501.62 03677 -75210 8/20 - 9/19/01 10041771 69488 -10285 8/8- 9/7/01 473 - 173413 - 643100 -00000 0.00 629.31 0.00 629.31 69488 -10285 8/8- 9/7/01 10041196 74015 -71141 8/13- 9/12/01 408. 233312 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 74015 -71141 8/13- 9/12/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 81 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042029 24516 -13315 8/21- 9/20/01 408 - 233313 - 643100 -00000 0.00 384.54 0.00 384.54 24516 -13315 8/21 - 9/20/01 10041196 81704 -51135 8/9- 9/8/01 408 - 253221 - 643100 -00000 0.00 599.70 0.00 599.70 81704 -51135 8/9- 9/8/01 10041771 70418 -33158 8/16. 9/17/01 408- 253221 - 643100 -00000 0.00 7,742.28 0.00 7.742.28 70418 -33158 8/16. 9/17/01 10041196 44831 -31100 8/7. 9/6/01 101 - 163630 - 643100.00000 0.00 9.28 0.00' 9.28 44831 -31100 8/7- 9/6/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 111,219.76 CHECK NO 558629 VENDOR 314660 - FLORIDA PROPERTY MAINTENANCE 10041483 #673 111. 156334 - 634999 -00000 0.00 0.00 001 - 156363 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 102327 9/01 SUGDEN LAWN SVC. 10040990 667 111 - 156334 - 634999 -00000 0.00 4,400.00 0.00 4,400.00 102327 09/01 LAKE TRAFFORD LAWN SERV CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.500.00 CHECK NO 558660 VENDOR 323760 - FLORIDA RECYCLING 10041501 069480 472 - 173422 - 634999 -00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 102055 CARDBOARD RECYCLING SVC. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 200.00 CHECK NO 558209 VENDOR 112450 - FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES 10040304 1140010891 111 - 163645 - 653110 -00000 0.00 114.28 0.00 114.28 100813 - LIMEROCK 10041010 1140010961 111 - 163645 - 653110 -00000 0.00 280.22 0.00 280.22 100813 LIMEROCK 10041010 1140011034 111 - 163645 - 653110 -00000 0.00 634.01 0.00 634.01 100813 LIMEROCK 10040304 1140010890 111 - 163645 - 653110.00000 0.00 123.98 0.00 123.98 100813 - LIMEROCK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,152.49 CHECK NO 558263 VENDOR 135230 - FLORIDA STATE UNDERGROUND, INC SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042097 #6 (RETAINAGE) 411 - 000000- 205100 -00000 0.00 2,716.86- 0.00 102895 THRU 8/25/01 (RETAINAGE) 10042097 #6 411 - 273511 - 763100 -70862 0.00 27,168.58 0.00 102895 THRU 8/25/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558208 VENDOR 112340 FORESTRY RESOURCES 10040991 443852 111- 156334 - 646318 -00000 0.00 2,572.50 0.00 105801 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558236 VENDOR 126420 FORESTRY RESOURCES 10041006 444017 001 - 126334 - 646314 -00000 0.00 381.50 0.00 RED MULCH 10041499 442904 152 - 162541 - 646318 -00000 0.00 975.00 0.00 107035 PINE STRAW CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558719 VENDOR 336540 FORT DODGE ANIMAL HEALTH 10040996 709280 001 - 155410 - 652710.00000 0.00 255.00 0.00 MEDICINES 10040156 704195 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 646.00 0.00 107174 - K9 VACCINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558477 VENDOR 252420 FORT MYERS FORKLIFT & INDUSTRIAL 10040294 16682 001 - 122240 - 646450 -00000 0.00 74.25 0.00 57857 - 112 HR TRAVEL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558359 VENDOR 179580 FORT MYERS VAULT COMPANY 10041800 8/16 MORENO 001 - 122370 - 631990 -00000 0.00 295.00 0.00 100137 8/16 MORENO LK.TRAFFORD 10041800 8/6 HATCHER 001 - 122370 - 631990 -00000 0.00 295.00 0.00 100137 8/6 HATCHER LK.TRAFFORD SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 83 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041800 8/17 SCHMUTTERM 001 - 122370 - 631990 -00000 0.00 295.00 0.00 295.00 100137 8/17 SCHMUTTERM LK.TRAFFORD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 885.00 CHECK NO 558367 VENDOR 183020 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. 10041852 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 217320 -00000 0.00 2,992.65 0.00 2,992.65 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,992.65 CHECK NO 558049 VENDOR 343740 FPL POWER QUALITY SEMINAR 10041567 REGIST D HOLMES 001 - 122240 - 654360 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 558784 VENDOR 343740 - FPL POWER QUALITY SEMINAR 10041188 REGIST S LANG 10/3 408 - 253221. 654360 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 058471 REGIST S LANG 10/3 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 558801 VENDOR 900030 - FRED BLATCHLEY 212611 9/12.14 TRVL F BLATCHLEY 001. 121710- 640300 -00000 0.00 27.00 0.00 27.00 9/12 -14 TRVL F BLATCHLEY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 27.00 CHECK NO 558761 VENDOR 343020 - FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA 10040310 WHEN PENGUINS ATTACK /LOST 001 - 156110 - 649990.00000 0.00 23.95 0.00 23.95 58958 - LOST BOOK REPAYMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 23.95 CHECK NO 558298 VENDOR 157320 - FREEMAN AND FREEMAN INC. 10041316 #18 191 - 138785. 884200 -00000 0.00 4,400.00 0.00 4,400.00 3588120007 N WILLIAMS 107443 10041547 #16 191 - 138785 - 884200.00000 0.00 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 00061760004 M BROWN 107442 10041546 #20 191 - 138785 - 884200 -00000 0.00 11,500.00 0.00 11,500.00 00117000003 V HENDERSON 107484 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558582 VENDOR 290310 FREIGHTLINER OF TAMPA 10040470 102495P 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 101510 PARTS 0.00 10041584 103465P 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 10041821 101510 PARTS 0.00 10041584 103456P 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 UNIFORMS 8/28 101510 PARTS 10041824 10041583 CM97539P 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 101510 CREDIT UNIFORMS 8/27 10041585 104403P 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 101510 PARTS 0.00 10041584 103491P 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 10042055 101510 PARTS 0.00 10041584 103265P 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 - UNIFORMS, 8/27 101510 PARTS 10041816 CHECK NO 558710 VENDOR 333980 - G&K SERVICES 31.80 10041823 601096 0.00 111- 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 106465 UNIFORMS 426.42 10041821 598673 0.00 470 - 173442. 652130 -00000 0.00 106675 UNIFORMS 8/28 123.02 10041824 597910 0.00 001- 122240 - 652130.00000 0.00 106526 UNIFORMS 8/27 187.87 10041823 593822 0.00 111. 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 106465 UNIFORMS 8/20 20.15 10042055 597904 0.00 408 - 233352 - 652130 -00000 0.00 106368 - UNIFORMS, 8/27 125.14 10041816 597903 0.00 001- 172930 - 652130 -00000 0.00 107034 UNIFORMS 8/27 114.86 10041823 598645 0.00 111 - 156334 - 652130.00000 0.00 106465 UNIFORMS 26.38 16JI PAGE 84 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 23,400.00 0.00 31.80 0.00 31.80 0.00 144.01 0.00 144.01 0.00 426.42 0.00 426.42 0.00 875.00- 0.00 875.00- 0.00 123.02 0.00 123.02 0.00 57.53 0.00 57.53 0.00 187.87 0.00 187.87 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 95.65 0.00 20.15 0.00 20.15 0.00 21.39 0.00 21.39 0.00 125.14 0.00 125.14 0.00 27.40 0.00 27.40 0.00 114.86 0.00 114.86 0.00 64.09 0.00 64.09 0.00 26.38 0.00 26.38 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 85 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041822 597906 111 - 156381- 634999 -00000 0.00 1.92 0.00 1.92 106955 MOPS 8/27 10041818 597898 001 - 155410 - 652130 -00000 0.00 21.75 0.00 21.75 106300 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041831 597916 408 - 233313 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.60 0.00 16.60 106355 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041823 601099 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 16.12 106465 UNIFORMS 10041817 597911 114. 178975- 652130 -00000 0.00 48.59 0.00 48.59 106040 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041830 597897 408 - 253211. 652130 -00000 0.00 79.10 0.00 79.10 106359 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041823 597902 001 - 156363 - 652130 -00000 0.00 12.09 0.00 12.09 106465 UNIFORMS 10041827 601090 408 - 253250- 652130 -00000 0.00 38.15 0.00 38.15 106425 UNIFORMS 8/31 10041833 597908 408. 253212 - 652130 -00000 0.00 250.96 0.00 250.96 106333 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041829 597912 101. 163646. 652130 -00000 0.00 35.17 0.00 35.17 106335 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041821 601071 470 - 173441 - 652130.00000 0.00 34.65 0.00 34.65 106675 UNIFORMS 8/31 10041823 601994 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 30.41 0.00 30.41 106465 UNIFORMS 9/3 10041826 597917 408- 233312. 652130 -00000 0.00 120.05 0.00 120.05 106418 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041822 597906 111 - 156381 - 652130 -00000 0.00 4.03 0.00 4.03 106955 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041823 597896 111 - 156332 - 652130.00000 0.00 27.40 0.00 27.40 106465 UNIFORMS 10041825 601091 408 - 253221 - 652130 -00000 0.00 73.31 0.00 73.31 106402 UNIFORMS 8/31 10041832 597913 101 - 163630. 652130 -00000 0.00 106.22 0.00 106.22 104974 UNIFORMS 8/27 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041823 597901 106465 UNIFORMS 10041823 578279 106465 UNIFORMS 7/24 10041819 597914 106366 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041817 601987 106040 UNIFORMS 9/3 10041823 597907 106465 UNIFORMS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111. 156332- 652130 -00000 0.00 111 - 156334 - 652130 -00000 0.00 408 - 210130 - 652130 -00000 0.00 114 - 178975 - 652130 -00000 0.00 001 - 156363 - 652130 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558736 VENDOR 339190 - G &K SERVICES 307.44 10041820 598646 0.00 101 - 163620 - 652130 -00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 106566 UNIFORMS 10041828 597915 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 106430 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041828 597915 109 - 182901. 652130 -00000 0.00 106430 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041828 597915 109 - 182602 - 652130 -00000 0.00 106430 UNIFORMS 8/27 10041820 597899 101 - 163620 - 652130 -00000 0.00 106566 UNIFORMS CHECK NO 558251 VENDOR 130230 - GARY KESSLER 10041797 REIMB.GUM FOR SPORTS CAMP 111 - 156341 - 652210.00000 0.00 059187 REIMB.GUM FOR SPORTS CAMP CHECK NO 558500 VENDOR 260540 - GATES MCVEY CAPITAL GROUP,L.L.C. 10041622 REFUND 285019 GATES MCVEY 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 GATES MCVEY REFUND 285019 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 42.79 0.00 26.38 0.00 307.44 0.00 56.91 0.00 45.77 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 69.81 0.00 1.95 0.00 42.30 0.00 16.12 0.00 237.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.55 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 86 VCHR NET 42.79 26.38 307.44 56.91 45.77 1,795.22 69.81 1.95 42.30 16.12 237.00 367.18 30.55 30.55 40.00 40.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 87 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558664 VENDOR 325460 - GC CONSTRUCTION 10041293 01 -004 191 - 138785- 884200 -00000 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 9,000.00 65170360000 E JACKSON 107435 10041182 16031 191 - 138785 - 884200 -00000 0.00 4,985.00 0.00 4,985.00 65171480002 D RILEY 107437 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13,985.00 CHECK NO 558508 VENDOR 261770 - GERARD FISCHER, PAC 10041487 A.MCGEE 5/17/01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 478.40 0.00 478.40 059035 A.MCGEE 5/17/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 478.40 CHECK NO 558747 VENDOR 341090 - GLOBAL 10041505 51128370 408 - 253212 - 764180 -00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 106908 WELDING BENCH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,000.00 CHECK NO 558193 VENDOR 108270 - GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES 10040306 31138238 111 - 138313. 651110 -00000 0.00 400.87 111 - 138313. 641950 -00000 0.00 12.40 0.00 413.27 57266 - CARTRIDGES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 413.27 CHECK NO 558562 VENDOR 283160 - GLOBE TICKET & LABEL 10041796 142720 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 122.80 0.00 122.80 057785 WRISTBAND FOR POOL PASS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 122.80 CHECK NO 558095 VENDOR 7770 - GOLDEN GATE NURSERY 10040473 71870 408 - 253212 - 646314 -00000 0.00 25.50 0.00 25.50 100920 SOD 10041804 71915 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 100814 TURF 10040473 71924 408 - 253212 - 646314 -00000 0.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 100920 SOD SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10040285 71860 58658 - WEIGHT TAPE 10040471 71887 100814 BAHIA PALLETS 10040471 71866 100814 BAHIA PALLETS 10041490 71847 059075 WEIGHT TAPE 10040471 71868 100814 BAHIA PALLETS 10040473 71855 100920 SOD 10041804 71913 100814 TURF 10041804 71912 100814 TURF 10040473 71917 100920 SOD 10040471 71883 100814 BAHIA PALLETS 10040473 71900 100920 SOD 10040471 71875 100814 BAHIA PALLETS 10041490 71860 059075 WEIGHT TAPE 10041490 71847 059075 WEIGHT BUILDS /SALT #50 10040472 71869 100904 SOD 10041803 0002 101556 HAY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 45.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 111. 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 408 - 253212. 646314 -00000 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 408. 253212 - 646314 -00000 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 408 - 253212. 646314 -00000 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314.00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652210 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351. 646314 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652210.00000 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 4.95 0.00 45.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 4.95 0.00 180.00 0.00 54.98 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 42.50 0.00 90.00 0.00 34.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 4.95 0.00 28.20 0.00 50.00 0.00 135.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 88 VCHR NET 4.95 45.00 90.00 4.95 180.00 54.98 90.00 90.00 42.50 90.00 34.00 90.00 4.95 28.20 50.00 135.00 1,245.03 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 89 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558345 VENDOR 171810 - GOLDEN GATE POOL SUPPLIES INC. 10041481 14611 111 - 156313- 652311 -00000 0.00 0.00 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 20.85 0.00 20.85 101240 SUPPLIES 10041013 14103 111 - 156349 - 652311 -00000 0.00 108.00 0.00 108.00 101241 CHEMICALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 128.85 CHECK NO 558356 VENDOR 178630 GRAINGER 10040468 287. 2919424 101. 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 191.76- 0.00 191.76- 100558 HARDWARE 10040468 973 - 6652687 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 90.63 0.00 90.63 100558 HARDWARE 10040468 833 - 3673120 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 130.56 0.00 130.56 100558 HARDWARE 10041587 834 - 594240 -6 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 70.46 0.00 70.46 100099 SUPPLIES 10040468 378. 1802719 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 120.84 0.00 120.84 100558 HARDWARE 10041014 931 - 434367 -5 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 17.76 0.00 17.76 100588 PLIERS 10040476 287 - 1441925 408 - 210130 - 652910.00000 0.00 798.50 0.00 798.50 101453 SUPPLIES 10040468 287 - 2919416 101 - 163620 - 652140 -00000 0.00 50.94 0.00 50.94 100558 HARDWARE 10040475 287 - 144193 -3 109 - 182901- 652990 -00000 0.00 190.81 0.00 190.81 101171 SHOP SUPPLIES 10042070 931 - 408533 -4 408 - 210130. 652910 -00000 0.00 1,009.59 0.00 1,009.59 101453 SUPPLIES 10040468 988- 1441910 101 - 163620 - 652990.00000 0.00 1,555.66 101 - 163620 - 652140 -00000 0.00 734.16 0.00 2,289.82 100558 HARDWARE 10041197 833. 413753 -9 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 94.08 408 - 253212- 655200 -00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.08 100287 BATTERIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 90 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10040468 931 - 1441902 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 399.76 101 - 163620 - 652140 -00000 0.00 418.37 0.00 818.13 100558 HARDWARE 10040474 833 - 193673 -5 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 159.81 0.00 159.81 100171 SHOP SUPPLIES 10040468 839 - 9466774 101 - 163620 - 652990.00000 0.00 216.42 0.00 216.42 100558 HARDWARE 10041805 931 - 481128 -3 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 81.11 101 - 163620 - 652910 -00000 0.00 0.00 101. 163620- 653900 -00000 0.00 0.00 101. 163620 - 651930 -00000 0.00 0.00 101- 163620 - 652140 -00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 81.11 100588 KNEEPADS /BOOTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,947.70 CHECK NO 558099 VENDOR 7900 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 10041965 0630199291 408 - 233351 - 655200 -00000 0.00 169.35 0.00 169.35 101206 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041965 0630200820 408. 233351- 655200 -00000 0.00 16.08 0.00 16.08 101206 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041965 0630199291 408 - 233351 - 655200 -00000 0.00 1.64- 0.00 1.64- 101206 DISCOUNT 10041477 0630202770 408- 253221 - 655100 -00000 0.00 0.22- 0.00 0.22- 101271 PARTS /DISCOUNT 10041480 0630201903 001- 122240 - 652993.00000 0.00 54.00 0.00 54.00 105978 LIGHTING & BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10041477 0630203563 408. 253221- 655100 -00000 0.00 1.06- 0.00 1.06- 101271 PARTS /DISCOUNT 10041588 0630201412 111 - 156332. 652991 -00000 0.00 578.78 0.00 578.78 100609 SUPPLIES 10041493 0630200558 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 52.53 0.00 52.53 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041494 0630201299 111 - 156332 - 652991.00000 0.00 209.68 0.00 209.68 100609 SUPPLIES 10041493 0630200555 001. 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 176.97 0.00 176.97 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 91 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041496 0630200559 111 - 156334 - 652991 -00000 0.00 111.00 0.00 111.00 100686 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041478 0630202021 408 - 253211 - 655100 -00000 0.00 276.80 0.00 276.80 101270 PARTS /DISCOUNT 10041494 0630200560 111 - 156332 - 652991 -00000 0.00 14.56 0.00 14.56 100609 SUPPLIES 10041493 0630201228 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 75.57 0.00 75.57 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041480 0630202383 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 40.04 0.00 40.04 105978 LIGHTING & BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10041493 0630201025 001 - 122240. 652993 -00000 0.00 41.16 0.00 41.16 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS 10041480 0630201513 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 47.20 0.00 47.20 105978 LIGHTING & BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10041493 0630200450 001 - 122240- 652993 -00000 0.00 99.50 0.00 99.50 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS 10041496 0630200381 111. 156334 - 652991 -00000 0.00 363.62 0.00 363.62 100686 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041495 0630195811 001 - 121141. 652910 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 103197 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 10041478 0630201900 408 - 253211 - 655100.00000 0.00 24.11 0.00 24.11 101270 PARTS /DISCOUNT 10041493 0630200448 001 - 122240- 652991 -00000 0.00 16.68 0.00 16.68 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041480 0630201281 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 3.60- 0.00 3.60- 105978 LIGHTING & BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10041494 0630200603 111 - 156332 - 652991 -00000 0.00 112.45 0.00 112.45 100609 SUPPLIES 10041493 0630200512 001 - 122240 - 652991.00000 0.00 17.39 0.00 17.39 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041477 0630203563 408 - 253221 - 655100 -00000 0.00 52.70 0.00 52.70 101271 PARTS /DISCOUNT 10041478 0630201900 408 - 253211 - 655100 -00000 0.00 0.38- 0.00 0.38- 101270 PARTS /DISCOUNT SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 47.49 0.00 17.49 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 0.00 479.29- FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10041493 0630200368 001 - 122240 - 652991.00000 0.00 6.39- 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 40.38 0.00 10041480 0630202383 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 104.84 105978 LIGHTING & BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 194.00 0.00 10041497 0630199081 408 - 233351 - 655200.00000 0.00 101206 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041493 0630201024 001 - 122240. 652991 -00000 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041480 0630201773 001 - 122240- 652993 -00000 0.00 105978 LIGHTING & BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10041493 0630200109 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 105978 CREDIT 10041493 0630200383 001 - 122240. 652991.00000 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041477 0630202770 408 - 253221 - 655100 -00000 0.00 101271 PARTS /DISCOUNT 10041480 0630201513 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 105978 LIGHTING & BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10041477 0630201107 408 - 253221 - 655100 -00000 0.00 101271 PARTS /DISCOUNT 10041480 0630201773 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 105978 LIGHTING & BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10041493 0630200440 001. 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041498 0630200577 408 - 233351 - 652990.00000 0.00 100997 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041493 0630199535 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10041494 0630201301 111 - 156332 - 652991 -00000 0.00 100609 SUPPLIES 10041480 0630201281 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 105978 LIGHTING & BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 34.30 0.00 0.40- 0.00 47.49 0.00 17.49 0.00 331.44 0.00 479.29- 0.00 250.72 0.00 34.01 0.00 0.94- 0.00 276.80 0.00 6.39- 0.00 40.38 0.00 409.75 0.00 438.00 0.00 104.84 0.00 194.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 92 VCHR NET 34.30 0.40- 47.49 17.49 331.44 479.29- 250.72 34.01 0.94- 276.80 6.39- 40.38 409.75 438.00 104.84 194.00 4,335.47 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558183 VENDOR 106610 - GRAYBAR ELECTRICAL SUPPLY 10041485 0620811775 355 - 156175. 762200 -80259 0.00 250.95 0.00 104627 LIGHTING FIXTURES 10041485 0620811776 355. 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 247.52 0.00 104627 LIGHTING FIXTURES 10041485 0620810331 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 772.50 0.00 104627 LIGHTING FIXTURES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558187 VENDOR 106780 GREGORY COURT REPORTING 10040308 955975 111 - 138911 - 649030 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 58870 - REPORTING SVC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558100 VENDOR 7950 GREYHOUND PACKAGE EXPRESS 10041500 68644306 001- 155410 - 641950 -00000 0.00 24.90 0.00 101066 SHIPPING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558513 VENDOR 263680 GUARDIAN EQUIPMENT INC 10040290 4544 408 - 253211. 655100 -00000 0.00 478.00 0.00 57451 - PARTS FOR CHLORINE SYSTEM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558764 VENDOR 343250 - GULF COAST PRINTING 10041489 22343 194. 101540- 634999 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 058933 OUTPUT MAP TO CD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558533 VENDOR 275710 - GULFSTREAM S.W. FLORIDA 10042034 1656 408 - 233351 - 655200 -00000 0.00 434.00 0.00 056963 AURORA PUMP PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558281 VENDOR 147410 - H.W. WILSON CO. SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6J 1 PAGE 94 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041015 54096855 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 915.00 0.00 915.00 107456 PUBLIC LIB CATALOG IITH ED 10040309 54090105 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 163.00 0.00 163.00 58725 - FICTION CATALOG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,078.00 CHECK NO 558829 VENDOR 900050 - HABITAT FOR HUMANITY 212624 REFUND MS74417 HABITAT 113. 138900 - 329200 -00000 0.00 125.00- 0.00 125.00 - HABITAT REFUND MS74417 RIGHT OF WAY 212621 REFUND MS74417 HABITAT 113 - 138900 - 322420.00000 0.00 40.00- 0.00 40.00 - HABITAT REFUND MS74417 PLAT REVIEW 212622 REFUND MS74417 HABITAT 113 - 138900. 323700 -00000 0.00 175.63 0.00 175.63 HABITAT REFUND MS74417 UTILITY REVW. 212625 REFUND MS74417 HABITAT 113 - 138900 - 341260 -00000 0.00 23.65- 0.00 23.65 - HABITAT REFUND MS74417 TREE PERMIT 212620 REFUND MS74417 HABITAT 113 - 138900 - 322420 -00000 0.00 642.33 0.00 642.33 HABITAT REFUND MS74417 SUBDI.REVIEW 212619 REFUND MS74417 HABITAT 113 - 138900. 322430 -00000 0.00 1,841.50 0.00 1,841.50 HABITAT REFUND MS74417 SUBDI.INSPEC. 212623 REFUND MS74417 HABITAT 113 - 138900 - 323710 -00000 0.00 526.90 0.00 526.90 HABITAT REFUND MS74417 UTIL.INSPEC. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,997.71 CHECK NO 558603 VENDOR 302880 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER 10041621 REFUND 286932 HABITAT 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 68.61 0.00 68.61 HABITAT REFUND 286932 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 68.61 CHECK NO 558341 VENDOR 169540 HANNULA LANDSCAPING, INC. 10042095 #5 111 - 163646 - 763100.60039 0.00 197,927.85 0.00 197,927.85 103372 - THRU 8/22/01 10042095 #5 (RETAINAGE) 111 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 19,792.79- 0.00 19,792.79- 103372 - THRU 8/22/01 (RETAINAGE) CHECK TOTAL 0.00 178,135.06 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558253 VENDOR 131720 - HARCROS CHEMICALS. INC. 10041484 740054432 408 - 233312 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1.400.67 0.00 100522 CHEMICALS 10040992 740054345 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,732.44 0.00 100252 CHEMICALS 10040985 740054422 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2,598.66 0.00 100260 CHEMICAL 10042071 740054294 408 - 233312 - 652310.00000 0.00 2,881.52 0.00 100528 CHEMICAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558447 VENDOR 232340 - HARLEQUIN SALES GROUP 10038299 18902 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 10.52 0.00 100726 NOVELS FOR JAIL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558504 VENDOR 261480 - HARRINGTON COURT REPORTING 10040993 FILE LR -29 -B J,HERMANN 681 - 410310 - 633051 -00000 0.00 29.00 0.00 00 -2084 J,HERMANN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558659 VENDOR 323370 HARRIS COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 10041866 PP #26 001. 000000 - 218810 -00000 0.00 179.08 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558753 VENDOR 342180 HAWTHORN SUITES HOTEL 10039576 133096 R LINCOLN 001 - 121143- 640300.00000 0.00 515.00 0.00 107235 R LINCOLN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558185 VENDOR 106690 - HAZEN & SAWYER, ENGINEERS 10042100 #1.40397 413 - 263611. 763100.73077 0.00 76,708.00 0.00 603943 - 5/01 THRU 7/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558830 VENDOR 900050 - HECTOR ORTEGON 212606 REFUND PARKS H ORTEGON 670 - 000000 - 220010 -00000 0.00 REFUND PARKS H ORTEGON CHECK NO 558270 VENDOR 140110 - HEDBERG ASSOCIATES 10041482 2001070486 111 - 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 2001070486 10041482 2001070487 111 - 138911. 634804 -00000 0.00 2001070487 10041482 2001080201 111 - 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 2001080201 10041482 2001071140 111 - 138911 - 634804.00000 0.00 2001071140 10041482 2001080143 111 - 138911 - 634804.00000 0.00 2001080143 10041482 2001070470 111 - 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 2001070470 10041482 2001070360 111 - 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 2001070360 10041482 2001080023 111 - 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 2001080023 10041482 2001071056 111 - 138911. 634804 -00000 0.00 2001071056 10041482 2001071128 111. 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 2001071128 10041482 2001070462 111 - 138911 - 634804.00000 0.00 2001070462 10041482 2001070795 111 - 138911. 634804 -00000 0.00 2001070795 CHECK NO 558101 VENDOR 8430 - HELENA CHEMICAL CO 10041202 22719409 109 - 182602 - 652310 -00000 0.00 100310 CHEMICALS 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 200.00 CHECK TOTAL 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 110.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 850.00 0.00 PAGE 96 VCHR NET 200.00 200.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 110.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 715.00 850.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041206 22719410 100310 CHEMICALS 10041207 22719513 100310 CHEMICALS 10041492 22719275 102851 CHEMICALS CHECK NO 558698 VENDOR 331450 - HIRECHECK, INC. 10041007 9002HD0107 001 - 121810- 634999 -00000 104424 BACKGROUND CHECK 10041007 9002HD0106 001 - 121810 - 634999 -00000 104424 BACKGROUND CHECK 10041007 9002HD0108 001 - 121810. 634999 -00000 104424 BACKGROUND CHECK CHECK NO 558102 VENDOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 AND ASSOC INC PAGE 97 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 152.50 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 102671 - 7/28/01 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 8/24/01 3,666.00 10041687 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 109 - 182602- 652310 -00000 0.00 1.000.00 0.00 1,000.00 109 - 182602 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 495 - 192330 - 652310 -00000 0.00 357.00 0.00 357.00 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33326 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,207.00 CHECK NO 558698 VENDOR 331450 - HIRECHECK, INC. 10041007 9002HD0107 001 - 121810- 634999 -00000 104424 BACKGROUND CHECK 10041007 9002HD0106 001 - 121810 - 634999 -00000 104424 BACKGROUND CHECK 10041007 9002HD0108 001 - 121810. 634999 -00000 104424 BACKGROUND CHECK CHECK NO 558102 VENDOR 8810 - HOLE MONTES AND ASSOC INC 10041680 41822 0.00 152.50 0.00 497 - 192340 - 631400 -33010 102671 - 7/28/01 THRU 8/24/01 3,666.00 10041687 41816 0.00 14,560.00 0.00 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33383 0.00 106876 6/30/01 THRU 7127101 1,497.00 10041681 41818 0.00 2.896.80 0.00 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33326 0.00 102558 6/30/01 THRU 7/27/01 1,400.00 10041682 41823 0.00 2,943.50 0.00 496 - 192341 - 631400 -33330 7479 - 6/30/01 THRU 7/27/01 10042000 41824 496 - 192340 - 631400.33343 103670 - 6/30/01 THRU 7/27/01 10041685 41821 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33327 103671 6/30/01 THRU 7/27/01 10041684 41849 413. 263611 - 631400 -73076 105917 THRU 7/27/01 10041686 41819 496 - 192340- 631400.33327 103672 6/30/01 THRU 7/27/01 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 425.00 0.00 425.00 0.00 152.50 0.00 152.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 607.50 0.00 3,666.00 0.00 3,666.00 0.00 14,560.00 0.00 14,560.00 0.00 3,014.80 0.00 3,014.80 0.00 1,497.00 0.00 1,497.00 0.00 2.896.80 0.00 2,896.80 0.00 4,835.00 0.00 4,835.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 2,943.50 0.00 2,943.50 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041673 1999053 (REVISED) 916827 - THRU 9/14/01 10041680 41994 102671 - 7/28/01 THRU 8/24/01 10041684 41975 105917 THRU 8/24/01 10041683 41976 105918 THRU 8/24/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 16.70 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 0.00 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 496. 192341- 631400 -33377 0.00 413.67 0.00 497 - 192340. 631400 -33010 0.00 1,463.00 0.00 413 - 263611 - 631400 -73076 0.00 250.00 0.00 413 - 263611. 631400 -73076 0.00 851.00 0.00 001 - 122240 - 652989.00000 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558248 VENDOR 127470 - HOLIDAY INN BUSCH GARDENS 10040149 #61626766 J.CLEMMENTS 113 - 138915 - 640300 -00000 58882 - #61626766 J.CLEMMENTS CHECK NO 558321 VENDOR 164250 - HOME DEPOT 10041208 7021018 104681 BUILDING MATERIAL 10041200 5041376 104678 BUILDING MATERIAL 10041201 7021121 102741 BUILDING MATERIALS 10041208 5071348 104681 BUILDING MATERIAL 10040287 7022137 57793 - SUPPLIES 10041201 8072064 102741 BUILDING MATERIALS 10041969 6021157 104681 BUILDING MATERIAL 10041201 4011908 102741 BUILDING MATERIALS 10041208 0150796 104681 BUILDING MATERIAL 0.00 260.00 CHECK TOTAL 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 22.93 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 16.70 001 - 122240 - 652989 -00000 0.00 116.12 111. 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 120.13 111 - 156349 - 652910.00000 0.00 160.93 111. 156349- 652990 -00000 0.00 208.73 001 - 122240 - 652989.00000 0.00 36.54 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 14.97 001 - 122240 - 652989 -00000 0.00 23.24 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 878.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 98 VCHR NET 413.67 1.463.00 250.00 851.00 37.790.77 260.00 260.00 22.93 16.70 116.12 120.13 369.66 36.54 14.97 23.24 878.75 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041208 8011702 104681 BUILDING MATERIAL 10041208 8011741 104681 BUILDING MATERIAL CHECK NO 558683 VENDOR 328710 - HOME DEPOT 10041581 6071290 059112 SIGN SECTION SUPPLIES 10040293 6041343 58313 - SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 652990 -00000 146 - 144380 - 646110 -00000 CHECK NO 558556 VENDOR 281640 - HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 10041919 8212121 VCHR NET 206.29 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 206.29 8264064000 J GARCIA 107041 CHECK TOTAL 10041925 3220095 0.00 568.69 191 - 138785 - 884100.00000 568.69 36302960003 R WELLS 58924 306.00 10041987 3192371 0.00 2.106.73 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 361.71 36438320009 A FEOJ00 107040 35.00 10041922 2192421 0.00 1,037.33 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 1.037.33 36438320009 A FEIJ00 58553 218.88 10041923 4192343 0.00 1,111.78 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 1,963.42 80240000149 M LEPORE 58425 44.91- 10041985 1212220 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 80240000149 M LEPORE 107158 10041920 421739 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 36962520003 S BRYAN 57517 10041983 4192344 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 62156480004 E SIMEUS 107039 10041986 3192370 191 - 138785. 884100 -00000 36123720008 I AGUILERA 107038 10041921 3202331 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 30805000385 L TORRES 58624 16J1 PAGE 99 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 206.29 0.00 206.29 34.35 0.00 34.35 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,839.68 0.00 47.08 0.00 47.08 0.00 56.88 0.00 56.88 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 103.96 0.00 568.69 0.00 568.69 0.00 306.00 0.00 306.00 0.00 2,106.73 0.00 2.106.73 0.00 361.71 0.00 361.71 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 0.00 1,037.33 0.00 1.037.33 0.00 218.88 0.00 218.88 0.00 1,111.78 0.00 1,111.78 0.00 1,963.42 0.00 1,963.42 0.00 44.91- 0.00 44.91- SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6J 1 PAGE 100 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041984 9212404 191 - 138785- 884100 -00000 0.00 1.257.65 0.00 1,257.65 36249160005 T LYONS 107377 10041922 4190088 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 88.00- 0.00 88.00- 36438320009 A FEIJOO 58553 10041918 3212187 191. 138785- 884100 -00000 0.00 723.88 0.00 723.88 40624400004 S NAVARRO 107157 10041924 9192189 191 - 138785 - 884100.00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 10624400004 S NAVARRO 58426 10041921 7212284 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 403.75 0.00 403.75 30805000385 L TORRES 58624 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,996.91 CHECK NO 558831 VENDOR 900050 - HOMESCHOOLERS OF COLLIER COUNTY 212618 REF.PARKS HOMESCHOOLERS 670 - 000000 - 220010 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 HOMESCHOOLERS REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 558546 VENDOR 279710 - HORVATH ELECTRIC MOTORS 10042031 0968 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 577.50 0.00 577.50 104472 LABOR &PARTS PUMP /MOTOR REPAIR 10041963 0966 408 - 233312. 634999 -00000 0.00 2,106.63 0.00 2,106.63 104474 MOTOR PARTS & REPAIRS 10041507 0984 408. 253211- 634999 -00000 0.00 2,621.27 0.00 2,621.27 104476 MOTORS & PUMP /MOTOR REBUILD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,305.40 CHECK NO 558832 VENDOR 900050 - HOUCHIN CONSTRUCTION 212617 REFUND 286420 HOUCHIN 113 - 000000- 209102.00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 HOUCHIN CONSTRUCTION REFUND 286420 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 558833 VENDOR 900050 - HOWARD BOYNTON 212614 REFUND 285379 H.BOYNTON 113 - 000000. 115420 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 H.BOYNTON REFUND 285379 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 101 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558459 VENDOR 238740 - HY TECH WHOLESALE 10041011 40824 113 - 138312- 652920 -00000 0.00 41.00 0.00 41.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 10041005 44444 001 - 121140 - 652910 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 US ROBOTICS MODEM EXTERNAL 10041008 42452 001 - 121140 - 651950 -00000 0.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 105872 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT 10041012 39743 113 - 138312 - 652920 -00000 0.00 246.00 0.00 246.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 10041008 40920 001 - 121140. 651950 -00000 0.00 416.00 0.00 416.00 105872 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT 10041008 40977 001- 121140 - 651950 -00000 0.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 105872 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT 10041801 43960 470 - 173435 - 764900.00000 0.00 898.00 0.00 898.00 106614 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT 10041008 40975 001 - 121140 - 651950 -00000 0.00 226.00 0.00 226.00 105872 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT 10041008 42310 001 - 121140 - 651950 -00000 0.00 99.00 0.00 99.00 105872 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,216.00 CHECK NO 558103 VENDOR 9020 - HYDRAULIC HOSE AND EQUIP 10041586 096006 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 57.15 521- 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 57.15 100101 PARTS 10041586 095968 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 159.12 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 159.12 100101 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 216.27 CHECK NO 558260 VENDOR 134560 - ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 10041849 PP #26 001. 000000- 217001 -00000 0.00 24,145.04 0.00 24,145.04 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24,145.04 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558450 VENDOR 234180 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 10041269 12438658 001 - 432020 - 646710 -00000 0.00 119.69 0.00 102720 9/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558104 VENDOR 9140 IMMOKALEE ANIMAL CLINIC 10041659 146052 001 - 155410. 631980 -00000 0.00 34.00 0.00 58586 COMP CARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558207 VENDOR 112220 IMMOKALEE BULLETIN 10041244 55984133 SUBSCRIPTION 001 - 157110 - 654110 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 59022 SUBSCRIPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558105 VENDOR 9180 IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL CO 10042075 114 9/01 001 - 061010 - 643300 -00000 0.00 533.06 0.00 114 9/01 10041876 #100 8/01 001 - 122240 - 643300.00000 0.00 195.52 001 - 156150 - 643300 -00000 0.00 20.03 111. 163645 - 643300 -00000 0.00 74.47 0.00 #100 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558261 VENDOR 134950 - IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL COMPANY 10041237 9/01 COLLECTIONS 473 - 173412 - 634800 -00000 0.00 26,581.93 0.00 101040 9/01 COLLECTIONS 10041237 9/01 FRANCHISE FEE 473 - 173412. 313720 -00000 0.00 763.66- 0.00 101040 9/01 FRANCHISE FEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558284 VENDOR 147920 - IMMOKALEE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 10042108 2126066400 8/17 -9/19 111. 156334- 643400 -00000 0.00 81.25 0.00 2126066400 8/17.9/19 10042108 2126065400 8/19 -9/17 001 - 122370 - 643400.00000 0.00 7.97 0.00 2126065400 8/19 -9/17 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PAGE 103 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041982 1130014810 815- 9110101 001- 061010 - 643400 -00000 0.00 436.94 0.00 436.94 1130014810 8/5- 9/10/01 10042108 1112090300 8/01 -9/04 198 - 157440 - 643400 -00000 0.00 21.77 0.00 21.77 1112090300 8/01 -9/04 10042108 1110071000 8/09.9/16 111 - 156334. 643400 -00000 0.00 45.57 0.00 45.57 1110071000 8/09 -9/16 10041982 1108012000 8/6- 9/13/01 001. 061010 - 643400 -00000 0.00 602.60 490 - 144610. 643400 -00000 0.00 200.86 0.00 803.46 1108012000 8/6- 9/13/01 10042108 1110070100 8/09 -9/16 111. 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 21.77 0.00 21.77 1110070100 8/09 -9/16 10042108 1130055000 12/6 - 1/4/01 470 - 173435 - 643400 -00000 0.00 9.62 0.00 9.62 1130055000 12/6- 1/4/01 10042108 1108090320 8/06.9/13 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 21.77 0.00 21.77 1108090320 8/06 -9/13 10042108 1106022600 8/03 -9/06 111 - 163646 - 643400.00000 0.00 244.38 0.00 244.38 1106022600 8/03 -9/06 10042108 1108096100 8/06 -9/13 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 71.43 0.00 71.43 1108096100 8/06 -9/13 10042108 1105031400 8/02 -9/06 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 18.69 0.00 18.69 1105031400 8/02 -9/06 10042108 2126060700 8/17 -9/19 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 7.97 0.00 7.97 2126060700 8/17 -9/19 10041982 1108010300 8/6 -9/13 01 001. 061010 - 643400 -00000 0.00 375.34 0.00 375.34 1108010300 8/6- 9/13/01 10042108 1130055000 8/05 -9/10 470 - 173435 - 643400 -00000 0.00 11.01 0.00 11.01 1130055000 8/05 -9/10 10042108 1111161100 8/09 -9/14 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 18.69 0.00 18.69 1111161100 8/09 -9/14 10042108 1111160400 8/09.9/17 001 - 156150 - 643400 -00000 0.00 87.41 0.00 87.41 1111160400 8/09 -9/17 10041982 1130010100 8/5- 9/10/01 001 - 061010 - 643400 -00000 0.00 4,256.14 0.00 4,256.14 1130010100 8/5- 9/10/01 10042108 1110100200 8/09 -9/16 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 26.13 0.00 26.13 1110100200 8/09.9/16 CHECK NO 558322 VENDOR 164780 - INFO PLUS 10041266 #102 106304 8/01 10041522 PO 107330 107330 START UP FEE 408. 210151- 634999 -00000 0.00 473 - 173411 - 634999.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558583 VENDOR 290590 - INTELITRAN 10042038 CCSS0701 123 - 155975. 634104 -33075 0.00 106980 7/01 557.80 0.00 557.80 3.200.00 0.00 3,200.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J 1 PAGE 104 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042108 1106250800 8/05.9/07 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 33.89 0.00 33.89 1106250800 8/05 -9/07 10042108 1111160300 8/01 -9/04 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 125.86 0.00 125.86 1111160300 8/01 -9/04 10042108 1111161400 8/09 -9/14 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 289.10 0.00 289.10 1111161400 8/09 -9/14 10042108 1106250700 8/06 -9/13 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 47.33 0.00 47.33 1106250700 8/06 -9/13 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,063.49 CHECK NO 558106 VENDOR 9270 - INDUSTRIAL AIR PRODUCTS 10041880 29150 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 101596 CYLINDER 10041267 108221 470 - 173441 - 652990.00000 0.00 32.59 0.00 32.59 102788 PARTS 10041268 31614 146 - 144380 - 652720 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 101750 CYLINDERS 10041879 107487 408- 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 42.50 0.00 42.50 100945 OXYGEN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 125.09 CHECK NO 558178 VENDOR 103240 - INDUSTRIAL REFUSE SALES, INC. 10041238 01188 472 - 173422. 764990 -00000 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 9,000.00 107413 RECYCLERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,000.00 CHECK NO 558322 VENDOR 164780 - INFO PLUS 10041266 #102 106304 8/01 10041522 PO 107330 107330 START UP FEE 408. 210151- 634999 -00000 0.00 473 - 173411 - 634999.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558583 VENDOR 290590 - INTELITRAN 10042038 CCSS0701 123 - 155975. 634104 -33075 0.00 106980 7/01 557.80 0.00 557.80 3.200.00 0.00 3,200.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,757.80 264.00 0.00 264.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042038 CCSS0701 123 - 155973 - 634104 -33073 0.00 8,129.00 0.00 104341 7/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558259 VENDOR 134360 - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 10041873 PP #26 001 - 000000. 218900 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 PP #26 10041872 PP #26 001. 000000 - 218900 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558449 VENDOR 234030 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 10041871 PP #26 001- 000000 - 218900.00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558834 VENDOR 900050 INTERPLAN LLC 212639 283705 INTERPLAN 113 - 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 87.00 0.00 283705 INTERPLAN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558628 VENDOR 313840 IOSCAPITAL 10041265 52648403 681 - 421510 - 644620 -00000 0.00 311.69 0.00 100763 9/15 -10/14 10042043 52839830 001 - 157110. 644620 -00000 0.00 661.24 0.00 104701 10/4 -11/3 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558687 VENDOR 329450 - IRON AGE CORPORATION 10041242 122506PB 001. 155410- 652110 -00000 0.00 198.00 0.00 58533 SAFETY SHOES 10041881 095437PB 101 - 163620 - 652140.00000 0.00 111.00 0.00 104358 SAFETY SHOES 10041881 128918PB 101 - 163620 - 652140 -00000 0.00 111.00 0.00 104358 SAFETY SHOES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041881 1243589 101 - 163620 - 652140 -00000 0.00 111.00- 0.00 104358 SAFETY SHOES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558366 VENDOR 182380 ISLAND GARDEN CENTER 10041649 14494 001. 156160 - 634999 -00000 0.00 680.00 0.00 107444 PLANTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558108 VENDOR 9800 J C DRAINFIELD REPAIR 10041954 3820 413 - 263611 - 763100.73031 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 107656 PUMPING SUS 10041954 3821 413 - 263611. 763100 -73031 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 107656 PUMPING SVS 10041954 3819 413 - 263611- 763100 -73031 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 107656 PUMPING SVS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558733 VENDOR 339070 - J &J WHOLESALE NURSERY 10041289 1135 322 - 183825 - 763100.00000 0.00 1,950.00 0.00 106410 ORNAMENTAL PLANTS 10040352 1155 322 - 183825 - 763100.00000 0.00 546.00 0.00 106410 PLANTS 10040351 1147 322 - 183825 - 763100 -00000 0.00 240.00 0.00 106410 PLANTS 10040351 1147 322 - 183825 - 646320 -00000 0.00 675.00 0.00 107379 ROW PLANTINGS 10040353 1152 322 - 183825. 763100 -00000 0.00 780.00 0.00 106410 PLANTS 10040350 1134 322. 183825. 646320 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 58820 ROW PLANTINGS 10040354 1153 322 - 183825 - 646320.00000 0.00 168.30 0.00 107379 ROW PLANTINGS 10040350 1134 322 - 183825. 763100 -00000 0.00 780.00 0.00 106410 PLANTS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041662 1168 58824 PLANTS 10040353 1152 107379 ROW PLANTINGS 10041282 1146 106410 ORNAMENTAL PLANTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 322 - 183825- 646320 -00000 0.00 270.00 0.00 322 - 183825 - 646320 -00000 0.00 135.00 0.00 322. 183825- 763100 -00000 0.00 2,359.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558317 VENDOR 163520 - J. DANIEL LABS, M.D. 10041255 T MCDONALD 8/21 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 59037 T MCDONALD 8/21 CHECK NO 558340 VENDOR 169530 - J. ROLAND LIEBER, P.A. 10041288 0101 -0103 109 - 182900 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100182 SUS 7/28- 8/25/01 CHECK NO 558111 VENDOR 10570 J. W. CRAFT 10041263 20288 102304 8/5 -9/1 10041263 20292 102304 8/5 -9/1 10041264 20281 101278 8/5 -9/1 10041263 20290 102304 8/5 -9/1 10041263 20287 102304 8/5.9/1 10041263 20289 102304 8/5 -9/1 10041263 20291 102304 8/5 -9/1 10041263 20285 102304 8/5 -8/13 29.58 CHECK TOTAL 190.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 107 VCHR NET 270.00 135.00 2.359.50 8,003.80 29.58 29.58 190.00 190.00 111 - 156332 - 644600 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 111 - 156332 - 644600 -00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 470. 173443 - 634999 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 111 - 156334 - 644600 -00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 111 - 156334. 644600 -00000 0.00 252.00 0.00 252.00 111. 156332 - 644600 -00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 111. 156334 - 644600.00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 111 - 156332 - 644600 -00000 0.00 40.50 0.00 40.50 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PAGE 108 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041264 20282 470 - 173441 - 634999.00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 101278 8/5 -9/1 10041263 20284 111 - 156334- 644600 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 102304 8/5 -9/1 10041263 20283 111. 156332 - 644600.00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 102304 8/5 -9/1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,111.50 CHECK NO 558721 VENDOR 336570 J.A. WEBSTER, INC. 10041239 1115712 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 0.72- 0.00 0.72- 107296 DISC 10041239 1115712 001- 155410- 652710.00000 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 107296 SUPPLIES 10041239 1107001 001- 155410. 764990 -00000 0.00 21.51- 0.00 21.51- 107296 DISC 10041239 1107093 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 0.39- 0.00 0.39- 107296 DISC 10041239 1115856 001- 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 6.22- 0.00 6.22- 107296 DISC 10041239 1107001 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 2,863.40 0.00 2,863.40 107296 SUPPLIES 10041239 1107001 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 28.62- 0.00 28.62- 107296 DISC 10041239 1107048 001. 155410- 652710 -00000 0.00 117.00 0.00 117.00 107296 SUPPLIES 10041239 1105196 001 - 155410 - 764990 -00000 0.00 2,482.00 0.00 2,482.00 107296 SUPPLIES 10041239 1105196 001 - 155410 - 764990 -00000 0.00 24.82- 0.00 24.82- 107296 DISC 10041239 1107048 001 - 155410. 652710 -00000 0.00 1.17- 0.00 1.17- 107296 DISC 10041239 1107093 001- 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 107296 SUPPLIES 10041239 1105196 001 - 155410 - 652710.00000 0.00 0.70- 0.00 0.70- 107296 DISC SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041239 1115856 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 614.50 0.00 107296 SUPPLIES 10041239 1107001 001 - 155410 - 764990.00000 0.00 2.151.30 0.00 107296 SUPPLIES 10041239 1105196 001- 155410 - 652710.00000 0.00 68.96 0.00 107296 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558443 VENDOR 229750 - J.C.PRODUCTIONS 10041653 #082521 111 - 156313 - 634999 -00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 58259 ENTERTAINMENT 8/25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558445 VENDOR 231020 - J.M. TODD COMPANY 10041243 63136 001 - 121140 - 651210 -00000 0.00 14.82 0.00 58954 8/01 10041243 63135 001 - 121140 - 651210 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 58954 9/8 -10/7 10041524 61261 001- 010510. 651210 -00000 0.00 447.48 0.00 101957 7/9 -8/8 10041524 62688 001 - 010510- 651210 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 101957 7/3.8/29 10041524 63109 001 - 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 484.68 0.00 101957 8/9 -9/8 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558767 VENDOR 343350 J.W. CRAFT 10041661 20293 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60071 0.00 200.00 0.00 58602 8/30/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558107 VENDOR 9540 JACK AND ANN'S FEED 10041240 61008 001. 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 5.95 0.00 105637 SUPPLIES 10041240 61038 001 - 122240. 652990 -00000 0.00 15.09 0.00 105637 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041648 61091 105637 SUPPLIES 10041240 61032 105637 SUPPLIES 10041240 61007 105637 SUPPLIES 10041240 61078 105637 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 558297 VENDOR 156680 - JACK LYONS TRUCK PARTS, INC. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 0.00 PAGE 110 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 100149 PARTS 366.70- 10041261 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 100149 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 10041241 142599 0.00 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 001- 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 6.58 0.00 6.58 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 13.57 0.00 13.57 001. 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 2.69 0.00 2.69 001 - 122240 - 652990.00000 0.00 4.38 0.00 4.38 107243 7112 GG MASTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 48.26 CHECK NO 558297 VENDOR 156680 - JACK LYONS TRUCK PARTS, INC. 10041261 142606 0.00 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 100149 PARTS 366.70- 10041261 142803 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 100149 PARTS 509.41 10041241 142599 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100149 CREDIT 297.50 10041261 142460 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100149 PARTS 223.45 CHECK NO 558200 VENDOR 109260 - JACQUELINE SILANO 10041256 8/22 GG MASTER PLAN 0.00 111 - 138317 - 634999 -00000 0.00 107243 8/22 GG MASTER PLAN 366.70- 10041256 7/17 GG MASTER PLAN 0.00 111 - 138317 - 634999 -00000 107243 7/17 GG MASTER PLAN 509.41 10041262 8/10/01 LELY 0.00 152 - 162541. 649990 -00000 0.00 100192 8/10/01 LELY 0.00 297.50 10041664 8/14/01 GG 0.00 136. 162590 - 649990 -00000 0.00 59127 8/01 0.00 223.45 10041256 8/9 GG MASTER PLAN 0.00 111 - 138317 - 634999.00000 0.00 107243 8/9 GG MASTER PLAN 218.75 10041256 7/12 GG MASTER PLAN 111 - 138317 - 634999 -00000 107243 7112 GG MASTER PLAN 0.00 236.16 0.00 236.16 0.00 273.25 0.00 273.25 0.00 366.70- 0.00 366.70- 0.00 366.70 0.00 366.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 509.41 0.00 297.50 0.00 297.50 0.00 297.50 0.00 297.50 0.00 209.45 0.00 209.45 0.00 223.45 0.00 223.45 0.00 297.50 0.00 297.50 0.00 218.75 0.00 218.75 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558690 VENDOR 330170 JAMES J. GUERRA, M.D. 10041254 G TARVIN 8/28 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 81.25 0.00 59038 G TARVIN 8/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558780 VENDOR 343670 JAMIE MACCOU 10041068 8/27.31 TRVL J MACCOU 001.121140- 640200 -00000 0.00 52.20 0.00 8/27 -31 TRVL J MACCOU CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558188 VENDOR 107070 JANE S. SILVERSTEIN, M.D., P.A. 10041253 D CURRY 8/28 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 33.15 0.00 59039 D CURRY 8/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558109 VENDOR 9920 JEFFREY MCCARTNEY, M.D. P.A. 10041252 D BRILICH 8/17 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 81.25 0.00 59040 D BRILICH 8/17 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558232 VENDOR 121740 JEFFREY WALKER 10041086 9/10 TRVL J WALKER 518 - 121630 - 640300 -00000 0.00 69.31 0.00 9/10 TRVL J WALKER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558792 VENDOR 344050 JENINE C. OUILLETTE 10042039 9/13 2 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 26.00 0.00 OULILLETT 9/13 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558189 VENDOR 107490 JENKINS & CHARLAND, INC. 10041678 107624 331 - 163650 - 763100 -62031 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 107624 - 7/25/01 THRU 8/24/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 PAGE 112 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558771 VENDOR 343450 JENNIFER BELPEDIO 10041658 REIMB 001. 010510- 654360 -00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 58994 REIMB CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18.00 CHECK NO 558802 VENDOR 900030 JENNIFER PERRY 212664 9/18,21 TRVL J PERRY 198 - 157410 - 640300.00000 0.00 31.03 0.00 31.03 9/18,21 TRVL J PERRY 212663 7/17,9/17 -19 TRVL J PERRY 198 - 157410. 640200 -00000 0.00 16.82 0.00 16.82 7/17,9/17 -19 TRVL J PERRY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 47.85 CHECK NO 558586 VENDOR 292620 JM TODD, INC. 10041271 63110 001 - 122240 - 651210 -00000 0.00 161.29 0.00 161.29 102152 8/8 -9/8 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 161.29 CHECK NO 558110 VENDOR 10160 JOHN COLLINS AUTO PARTS, INC. 10041957 722353 408 - 210130 - 652910 -00000 0.00 5.99 0.00 5.99 103275 PARTS 10041957 724925 408 - 210130 - 652910 -00000 0.00 14.56 0.00 14.56 103275 PARTS 10041956 720683 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 222.18 0.00 222.18 102587 PARTS 10041958 723407 408 - 233312 - 652910.00000 0.00 27.13 0.00 27.13 101094 PARTS 10041957 724828 408 - 210130. 652910 -00000 0.00 2.25 0.00 2.25 103275 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 272.11 CHECK NO 558474 VENDOR 249800 JOHN DEERE CO. 10042035 05 -58859 111 - 156332 - 764990 -00000 0.00 19,802.88 0.00 19.802.88 107031 MOWERS 10042042 05 -58844 109 - 182901 - 764990.00000 0.00 6,398.64 0.00 6.398.64 106409 UTILITY VEHICLE SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558768 VENDOR 343360 - JOHNNY'S SELECTED SEEDS 10041249 SEED ORDER 001 - 157110. 646320 -00000 0.00 001- 157110 - 641950 -00000 0.00 58963 SEED ORDER PAGE 113 VCHR NET 26,201.52 14.75 3.95 0.00 18.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18.70 CHECK NO 558397 VENDOR 198950 JOHNSON CONTROLS INC. 10041542 10923436 113 - 138900- 762200 -00000 0.00 25,252.00 0.00 25,252.00 105743 TECH SVS /MAINT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.252.00 CHECK NO 558194 VENDOR 108280 JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. 10041647 10854136 301- 120435 - 763100 -80525 0.00 189,895.00 0.00 189,895.00 105922 RETROFIT CARD ACCESS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 189,895.00 CHECK NO 558257 VENDOR 133420 - JOHNSON ENGINEERING INC. 10042013 34 REVISED 331 - 163650 - 631400 -60134 0.00 104.500.00 0.00 104,500.00 801731 - THRU 7/29/01 10042013 34 REVISED 334 - 163650 - 631400 -60134 0.00 2,964.10 0.00 2,964.10 801731 - THRU 7/29/01 10042013 34 REVISED (RETAINAGE) 331 - 000000. 205100 -00000 0.00 5,225.00- 0.00 5,225.00- 801731 - THRU 7/29/01 (RETAINAGE) 10042013 34 REVISED (RETAINAGE) 334 - 000000- 205100.00000 0.00 148.20- 0.00 148.20- 801731 - THRU 7/29/01 (RETAINAGE) CHECK TOTAL 0.00 102,090.90 CHECK NO 558247 VENDOR 127280 - JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 10041273 182237 001 - 122240. 652996 -00000 0.00 56.71 0.00 56.71 107579 PARTS 10041273 181765 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 33.69 0.00 33.69 107579 PARTS 10041273 181995 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 33.57 0.00 33.57 107579 PARTS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041273 181326 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 289.39 0.00 107579 PARTS 10041273 181663 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 39.99 0.00 107579 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558791 VENDOR 344040 - JOSE A REY, PH D 10042040 L JUMPER 95 -2054 681- 431590 - 635700.00000 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 REY - L JUMPER 95 -2054 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558635 VENDOR 316820 - JOSEPH CHEATHAM 10038396 9/19 -20 TRVL J CHEATHAM 408 - 210120 - 640300 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 9/19 -20 TRVL J CHEATHAM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558723 VENDOR 336740 JUST PICTURE THIS, INC. 10041657 8/21 LIBRARY 001- 156180 - 646110 -00000 0.00 242.30 0.00 58439 MINI BLINDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558745 VENDOR 340660 JUST RITE SUPPLY 10041650 337224 111 - 156334 - 646313 -00000 0.00 572.00 0.00 107196 MARBLE DUST CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558640 VENDOR 317750 KAMELA MOTE 10042036 9/26/01 111 - 156313 - 634999 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 101724 9/26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558651 VENDOR 321380 KAROKE SHOWCASE, INC. 10041272 1129 111 - 156395 - 764990.00000 0.00 895.00 0.00 107252 KAROKE MACHINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 115 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558835 VENDOR 900050 KAYE HOMES 212646 REF 284598 KAYE HOMES 113. 000000. 115420 -00000 0.00 114.00 0.00 114.00 REF 284598 KAYE HOMES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 114.00 CHECK NO 558433 VENDOR 221100 KEEP COLLIER BEAUTIFUL, INC. 10041877 #63 472 - 173426. 634999 -00000 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 107728 PRINTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,500.00 CHECK NO 558409 VENDOR 204660 KEEP LEE COUNTY BEAUTIFUL INC. 10042114 080601 -1 470 - 173410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2,026.35 0.00 2,026.35 106498 7/01 10042113 092001 -3 470 - 173410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 7,999.00 0.00 7,999.00 106243 9/01 10042115 092001 -5 470 - 173410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 4,780.40 0.00 4,780.40 106180 8/01 10042113 090501 -1 470 - 173410 - 634999.00000 0.00 7,100.30 0.00 7,100.30 106243 8/01 10042115 092001 -2 470 - 173410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 5,255.40 0.00 5,255.40 106180 9/01 10042114 092001 -4 470 - 173410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2,327.50 0.00 2,327.50 106498 7/01 -9/01 RECY 10042114 082701.1 470 - 173410. 634999 -00000 0.00 5,452.05 0.00 5,452.05 106498 8/01 10042113 080601 -2 470. 173410- 634999 -00000 0.00 5,318.10 0.00 5,318.10 106243 7/01 10042115 081701 -3 470 - 173410 - 634999.00000 0.00 5,916.60 0.00 5,916.60 106180 7/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 46,175.70 CHECK NO 558235 VENDOR 125980 - KEITH P. HUSSEY, M.D., PA 10041251 B DRILICH 8/9 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 32.50 0.00 32.50 59041 B DRILICH 8/9 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558213 VENDOR 115150 - KELLY TRACTOR CO. 10041274 P2006060276 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 68.19 0.00 100102 PARTS 10041275 P2006062417 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 3.11 0.00 100102 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558650 VENDOR 321160 KILGORE SEED COMPANY 10041246 SEED ORDER 001 - 157110 - 646320 -00000 0.00 11.30 001 - 157110 - 641950.00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 58961 SEED ORDER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558389 VENDOR 194110 KILPATRICK TURF EQUIPMENT 10041276 1468502 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 95.45 0.00 100103 PARTS 10041276 1816600 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 37.26 0.00 100103 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558412 VENDOR 210340 KINKO'S 10041270 589900028066 001 - 156110 - 647110 -00000 0.00 50.94 0.00 100964 PRINTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558610 VENDOR 305300 KONE, INC 10041260 15434873 001 - 122240 - 646285.00000 0.00 2,941.96 0.00 100006 MAINT 8/01 10041260 15434874 001 - 122240. 646285 -00000 0.00 106.00 0.00 100006 MAINT 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558112 VENDOR 10890 KRAFT CONSTRUCTION 10042007 #8 (RETAINAGE) 355 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 42.067.60- 0.00 102846 - THRU 8/25/01 RETAINAGE SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 PAGE 117 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042007 #8 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 451,816.30 0.00 451,816.30 102846 - THRU 8/25/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 409,748.70 CHECK NO 558787 VENDOR 343870 KRISTIN LOFBLOOM 10041652 REIMB 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 17.28 0.00 17.28 59188 REIMB CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17.28 CHECK NO 558358 VENDOR 179430 KYLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 10042111 21.92 408 - 233351 - 646980 -00000 0.00 20,910.72 0.00 20,910.72 107368 REPAIRS 10042112 21 -91 408 - 233351 - 646980 -00000 0.00 5,564.72 0.00 5,564.72 107367 REPAIR 10041523 21 -93 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 599.33 0.00 599.33 107423 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 27,074.77 CHECK NO 558448 VENDOR 233740 LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIALS 10041656 2- 167176 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 465.80 0.00 465.80 55329 REST MATS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 465.80 CHECK NO 558613 VENDOR 305820 LANDMARK AUDIOBOOKS 10041651 84373 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 668.00 0.00 668.00 107658 AUDIO BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 668.00 CHECK NO 558638 VENDOR 317010 LAUREN BEARD 10041461 9/20 MBA LUNCH L BEARD 191 - 138785 - 654360 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 9/20 MBA LUNCH L BEARD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 CHECK NO 558262 VENDOR 135200 - LAWN EQUIPMENT CENTER 10041278 47778 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 69.34 0.00 69.34 100180 PARTS /RETURN SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6J 1 REPORT 100 -601 0.00 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041284 47748 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 67.71 0.00 100178 PARTS 10041278 47779 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 61.80- 0.00 100180 PARTS /RETURN 10041286 47674 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 224.11 0.00 100180 PARTS 10041285 47718 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 255.49 0.00 100180 PARTS 10041283 47606 109. 182901- 652990 -00000 0.00 27.14 0.00 100178 PARTS 10041278 47803 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 91.67 0.00 100180 PARTS /RETURN 10041287 18975 109 - 182901. 652990 -00000 0.00 109.16 109 - 182901 - 634999 -00000 0.00 67.50 0.00 100180 REPAIR MOWER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558686 VENDOR 329400 - LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 10041277 8407999 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 563.20 103749 PARTS CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 558401 VENDOR 201490 - LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES INC. 10041257 DIRECTORIES- LIBRARY 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 2,166.00 107472 DIRECTORIES CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 558114 VENDOR 11170 LEAHCHEM INDUSTRIES, INC. 10041259 19835 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 100254 CHEMICALS CHECK NO 558113 VENDOR 11110 LEE CO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 10041981 20195 - 110589 8/7 -9/7 470 - 173442- 643100 -00000 0.00 20195 - 110589 8/7 -9/7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,143.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 125.94 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 PAGE 119 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041981 20195. 101183 8/9 -9/11 001 - 156150 - 643100 -00000 0.00 554.79 0.00 554.79 20195 - 101183 8/9 -9/11 10041981 20195 - 145917 8/1 -31/01 001. 155410 - 643100 -00000 0.00 26.66 0.00 26.66 20195 - 145917 8/1.31/01 10041981 20195 - 154714 9/5 146 - 144380- 643100 -00000 0.00 294.50 490 - 144610 - 643100 -00000 0.00 172.38 0.00 466.88 20195. 154714 9/5 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,174.27 CHECK NO 558563 VENDOR 283250 - LEHIGH SAFETY SHOES 10041281 696712 101 - 163620. 652140 -00000 0.00 71.24 0.00 71.24 104094 SAFETY SHOES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 71.24 CHECK NO 558115 VENDOR 11240 - LEO'S SOD & LANDSCAPING 10041280 22979 111 - 163645. 646314 -00000 0.00 159.60 0.00 159.60 100818 SOD 10041290 6272 322 - 183825 - 646320.00000 0.00 2,726.00 0.00 2,726.00 107100 SOD 10041280 22951 111. 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 79.80 100818 SOD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,965.40 CHECK NO 558181 VENDOR 105260 - LESCO SERVICE CENTER 10041279 2B20J9 109 - 182901 - 652310 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 102101 CHELATED IRON 10041279 CM2B20T1 109- 182901. 652310 -00000 0.00 2.00- 0.00 2.00- 102101 CREDIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 98.00 CHECK NO 558325 VENDOR 165410 - LESCO SERVICE CENTER 10042037 2B1XN3 111 - 156332 - 652310 -00000 0.00 6,540.00 0.00 6,540.00 100749 MOLE CRICKET BAIT 10041955 2B2105 111. 156332 - 652310.00000 0.00 1,090.00 0.00 1,090.00 107291 FERTILIZER SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041258 2B2OA5 107291 FERTILIZER 10041258 2B2OA4 107291 FERTILIZER 10041955 2B2106 107291 FERTILIZER 10041258 2B2100 107291 FERTILIZER 10041955 2B21C3 107291 FERTILIZER 10041258 2B2OA3 107291 FERTILIZER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111 - 156332 - 652310.00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 652310 -00000 0.00 111- 156332 - 652310 -00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 652310 -00000 0.00 111- 156332 - 652310 -00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 652310 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558737 VENDOR 339350 - LIBRARY OUTREACH REPORTER 10041247 SUBSCRIPTION 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 57561 SUBSCRIPTION CHECK NO 558376 VENDOR 189850 - LIFE FORMATIONS 10040237 8/30 PIONEER WOMAN 198. 157410 - 764700 -00000 0.00 106423 8/30 PIONEER WOMAN 10040237 9/10 PIONEER MAN 198 - 157410. 764700 -00000 0.00 106423 9/10 PIONEER MAN CHECK NO 558772 VENDOR 343480 - LILIANA CARRENDER 10041878 9/13 4 HRS 681 - 431590. 634402 -00000 0.00 CARRENDER 9/13 CHECK NO 558794 VENDOR 344080 - LINDA FASULO 10042017 4/17,7/29 -8/2 L FASULO 001 - 156110- 640300 -00000 0.00 7/14,7/29 -8/2 TRVL L FASULO 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 3,720.00 0.00 2,976.00 0.00 1,080.00 0.00 4.75 0.00 1,080.00 0.00 2,232.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 32.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 120 VCHR NET 3,720.00 2,976.00 1,080.00 4.75 1,080.00 2,232.00 18,722.75 32.00 32.00 1,400.00 0.00 1.400.00 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,900.00 52.00 0.00 52.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52.00 289.10 0.00 289.10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 289.10 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558746 VENDOR 340920 LINE 1 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 10041663 CCEM 9/01 118 - 144210 - 641210 -33791 0.00 14.90 0.00 106951 9/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558836 VENDOR 900050 LISA CONYER 212647 REFUND PARKS CONYER 111 - 156341 - 347270 -00000 0.00 28.00 0.00 REFUND PARKS CONYER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558495 VENDOR 258940 LITTLE CEASARS 10041655 9/7/01 VINEYARDS 111 - 156390 - 652210 -00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 57219 PIZZA 10041654 8/30/01 VINEYARDS 111. 156390- 652210 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 57218 8/30/01 VINEYARDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558428 VENDOR 217720 LOUISE HARDY 10041736 9/13 -19 TRVL L HARDY 111. 156310 - 640200 -00000 0.00 6.96 0.00 9/13 -19 TRVL L HARDY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558320 VENDOR 164110 LOYAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO 10041870 PP #26 001- 000000 - 218400 -00000 0.00 218.29 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558837 VENDOR 900050 LUDE FERNANDEZ 212649 REFUND PARKS FERNANDEZ 111 - 000000 - 208901 -00000 0.00 1.80 0.00 FERNANDEZ REFUND PARKS 212648 REFUND PARKS FERNANDEZ 111 - 156381 - 347911.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 FERNANDEZ REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558734 VENDOR 339110 - LUXAM, INC. SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10040344 1265 198 - 157430 - 634999 -00000 0.00 4,782.00 0.00 107012 WINDOW TRTMT 10040344 1265 198 - 157430 - 634999 -00000 0.00 765.55 0.00 107012 WINDOW TRTMT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558779 VENDOR 343660 LYN WOOD 10041245 REIMBURSEMENT 001- 121710 - 654360 -00000 0.00 15.14 0.00 59058 REIMBURSEMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558646 VENDOR 320440 LYNDA BRISBOIS 10041250 8/13 -15/01 001 - 432030 - 634999 -00000 0.00 330.00 0.00 59014 8/13 -15/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558225 VENDOR 118170 LYNN EVANS 10041575 9/12 -14 TRVL L EVANS 521 - 122410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 9/12 -14 TRVL L EVANS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558549 VENDOR 280100 MAIL STATION COURIER 10041387 16160 408 - 210151 - 634999 -00000 0.00 264.00 0.00 101714 COURIER SERVICES 10041724 16161 408 - 233351.649990 -00000 0.00 111.67 408 - 233352 - 649990 -00000 0.00 111.67 408 - 233312 - 649990.00000 0.00 111.66 0.00 101235 COURIER SERVICE 10040978 16033 111 - 138110 - 634999 -00000 0.00 105.00 0.00 MAIL CORIER SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558679 VENDOR 327410 - MANODIX MEDIA 10041392 90401 355.156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 145.00 0.00 58777 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 56239342 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 0.00 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 612.00 0.00 10041403 56239247 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER CHECK TOTAL 102662 TEMP HELP 1.474.81 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER 155 - 112593 - 634999 -68062 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558175 VENDOR 100800 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 56239248 10041375 56239323 0.00 001 - 126334 - 646311 -00000 0.00 101601 TEMP HELP 10041375 56239324 001 - 126334 - 646311.00000 0.00 101601 TEMP HELP 10040955 56239325 150 - 162545 - 649990 -00000 0.00 102011 TEMP HELP CHECK NO 558573 VENDOR 285890 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 10040980 56239342 001. 100130- 634999 -00000 0.00 0.00 TEMP EMPLOYEE 612.00 0.00 10041403 56239247 155 - 112593. 634999 -68062 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 102662 TEMP HELP 1.474.81 91.20 10041403 56239246 155 - 112593 - 634999 -68062 0.00 72.97 102662 TEMP HELP 0.00 17.74 10041403 56239248 155 - 112593 - 634999 -68062 0.00 0.00 102662 TEMP HELP CHECK NO 558541 VENDOR 278190 - MAP SUPPLY INC 10040962 2291 001 - 121140. 654110 -00000 0.00 MAP OF COLLIER COUNTY CHECK NO 558592 VENDOR 298490 - MARC INDUSTRIES - TRANSCOM USA 10040959 3212390025 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100105 FLLET INVENTORY PARTS 10040959 3212470012 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100105 FLLET INVENTORY PARTS CHECK NO 558246 VENDOR 127090 - MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 10042016 107120538 001 - 121148 - 651110 -00000 0.00 101157 SUPPLIES 16JI PAGE 123 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 660.96 0.00 660.96 612.00 0.00 612.00 201.85 0.00 201.85 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.474.81 91.20 0.00 91.20 72.97 0.00 72.97 17.74 0.00 17.74 111.22 0.00 111.22 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 293.13 149.00 0.00 149.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 149.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 162.40 0.00 162.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 302.40 280.86 0.00 280.86 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 124 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041561 108280642 001 - 172910 - 651110 -00000 0.00 166.24 0.00 166.24 101193 SUPPLIES 10041576 106060658 113. 138930 - 651110 -00000 0.00 501.68 0.00 501.68 100394 SUPPLIES 10041576 106150653 113 - 138930 - 651110.00000 0.00 114.80 0.00 114.80 100394 SUPPLIES 10041224 108270672 001 - 156140. 651110 -00000 0.00 142.46 0.00 142.46 100928 SUPPLIES 10041576 108240590 113 - 138930 - 651110 -00000 0.00 62.88 0.00 62.88 100394 SUPPLIES 10041132 108290575 408 - 253212 - 651110 -00000 0.00 76.10 0.00 76.10 100224 SUPPLIES 10041227 108220544 408 - 210155 - 651110.00000 0.00 34.93 0.00 34.93 101072 SUPPLIES 10041411 108300632 113 - 138312 - 651110 -00000 0.00 131.20 0.00 131.20 100481 SUPPLIES 10041665 108280533 111 - 156380 - 652990 -00000 0.00 46.00 0.00 46.00 100883 SUPPLIES 10041136 108290653 408 - 210105 - 651110 -00000 0.00 79.58 0.00 79.58 100240 SUPPLIES 10041559 108240587 669 - 100220 - 651110 -00000 0.00 6.98 0.00 6.98 100982 SUPPLIES 10041162 108270678 198. 157410- 651110 -00000 0.00 5.76 0.00 5.76 057780 SUPPLIES 10041168 108280609 408 - 253212 - 651110.00000 0.00 103.00 0.00 103.00 100224 SUPPLIES 10041136 108290711 408- 210105. 651110 -00000 0.00 7.72 0.00 7.72 100240 SUPPLIES 10041140 107170571 001. 421070- 651110 -00000 0.00 4.40 0.00 4.40 100826 SUPPLIES 10041157 108270591 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 100647 SUPPLIES 10041563 101230734 001 - 000000. 142500 -00000 0.00 9.23- 0.00 9.23- 100647 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 125 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041577 108290623 473 - 173413. 651110 -00000 0.00 254.50 0.00 254.50 101531 SUPPLIES 10041233 108280514 470 - 173435 - 651110 -00000 0.00 407.04 0.00 407.04 103080 SUPPLIES 10041215 108150666 313 - 163611 - 651110.00000 0.00 8.37 0.00 8.37 100368 SUPPLIES 10042016 108080589 001. 121148- 651110 -00000 0.00 216.60 0.00 216.60 101157 SUPPLIES 10041174 108130515 001 - 121152 - 651110.00000 0.00 137.40 0.00 137.40 101157 SUPPLIES 10041222 108300681 101 - 163630. 651110 -00000 0.00 29.49 0.00 29.49 100803 SUPPLIES 10041170 108270593 001 - 010110 - 651110.00000 0.00 394.48 0.00 394.48 100621 SUPPLIES 10041164 108280616 001 - 156110 - 651910 -00000 0.00 85.74 0.00 85.74 058600 SUPPLIES 10041413 108280519 001. 121152 - 651110 -00000 0.00 54.44 0.00 54.44 101157 SUPPLIES 10041576 109060571 113 - 138930 - 651110 -00000 0.00 148.05 0.00 148.05 100394 SUPPLIES 10041229 108280557 408 - 253211. 651110 -00000 0.00 9.64 0.00 9.64 101628 SUPPLIES 10041227 108300704 408 - 210155 - 651110 -00000 0.00 65.00- 0.00 65.00- 101072 SUPPLIES 10041234 108230604 101 - 163612 - 651110 -00000 0.00 4.97 0.00 4.97 104394 SUPPLIES 10041561 108240595 001 - 172910 - 651110 -00000 0.00 21.50 0.00 21.50 101193 SUPPLIES 10042016 107100603 001 - 121148 - 651110 -00000 0.00 253.69 0.00 253.69 101157 SUPPLIES 10041158 108060670 001 - 155410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 910.49 0.00 910.49 100917 SUPPLIES 10041140 107160515 001 - 421070 - 651110 -00000 0.00 15.12 0.00 15.12 100826 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 126 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041576 107120650 113 - 138930 - 651110 -00000 0.00 162.68 0.00 162.68 100394 SUPPLIES 10041413 108290555 001- 121152 - 651110 -00000 0.00 87.48 0.00 87.48 101157 SUPPLIES 10041165 108280548 001 - 122240. 651110 -00000 0.00 1.84 0.00 1.84 100015 SUPPLIES 10041561 109050634 001. 172910- 651110 -00000 0.00 30.33 0.00 30.33 101193 SUPPLIES 10041234 108280655 101 - 163612 - 651110.00000 0.00 14.68 0.00 14.68 104394 SUPPLIES 10041407 107030563 408 - 253212 - 651110 -00000 0.00 187.50 0.00 187.50 100224 SUPPLIES 10041576 106200715 113 - 138930- 651110 -00000 0.00 89.27 0.00 89.27 100394 SUPPLIES 10041414 108080600 101 - 163612 - 651110 -00000 0.00 40.75 126 - 138332 - 651110.33202 0.00 40.75 0.00 81.50 106853 SUPPLIES 10041412 107090505 111 - 156341 - 651110 -00000 0.00 104.37 0.00 104.37 100868 SUPPLIES 10041163 108280522 001- 121143 - 651110 -00000 0.00 226.59 0.00 226.59 058558 SUPPLIES 10041169 108310617 001 - 121810. 651110 -00000 0.00 166.25 0.00 166.25 100373 SUPPLIES 10041135 108290556 001. 157110 - 652990.00000 0.00 68.92 0.00 68.92 100421 SUPPLIES 10041138 108280549 516 - 121650 - 651110.00000 0.00 31.68 0.00 31.68 100381 SUPPLIES 10041576 106220526 113 - 138930. 651110 -00000 0.00 77.00 0.00 77.00 100394 SUPPLIES 10041228 108270595 113. 138900- 651110 -00000 0.00 18.82 0.00 18.82 101450 SUPPLIES 10041226 108270631 111 - 156390- 651110 -00000 0.00 131.80 0.00 131.80 100889 SUPPLIES 10041561 108310633 001 - 172910. 651110 -00000 0.00 23.40 0.00 23.40 101193 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 127 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041134 108160518 001 - 122310 - 651110 -00000 0.00 35.45 0.00 35.45 100136 SUPPLIES 10041227 109060622 408 - 210155 - 651110 -00000 0.00 29.21 0.00 29.21 101072 SUPPLIES 10041576 108240545 113 - 138930 - 651110 -00000 0.00 271.84 0.00 271.84 100394 SUPPLIES 10041221 108300566 111 - 138317. 651110 -00000 0.00 63.24 0.00 63.24 100447 SUPPLIES 10041174 108140670 001 - 121152 - 651110 -00000 0.00 1.84 0.00 1.84 101157 SUPPLIES 10041215 108080666 313 - 163611 - 651110.00000 0.00 172.87 0.00 172.87 100368 SUPPLIES 10041834 107260673 001 - 121152 - 651110 -00000 0.00 370.00 0.00 370.00 101157 SUPPLIES 10041563 101190578 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 109.23 0.00 109.23 100647 SUPPLIES 10041156 108130567 111 - 156332 - 651110 -00000 0.00 118.61 0.00 118.61 100600 SUPPLIES 10041577 12200699 473. 173413 - 651110 -00000 0.00 873.38 0.00 873.38 101531 SUPPLIES 10040208 108290645 111 - 156395 - 651930 -00000 0.00 822.03 0.00 822.03 107130 SUPPLIES 10040216 103270561 PD 2X 470. 173410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 37.25- 0.00 37.25- 101797 CREDIT PD 2X 10041140 107200599 001 - 421070 - 651110.00000 0.00 169.60 0.00 169.60 100826 SUPPLIES 10041563 108290636 001 - 000000. 142500 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 100647 SUPPLIES 10041670 108310523 001. 144210- 651110 -00000 0.00 57.85 0.00 57.85 100948 SUPPLIES 10041133 108200513 490 - 144610 - 651110.00000 0.00 35.01 0.00 35.01 100069 SUPPLIES 10041561 108310609 001 - 172910. 651110 -00000 0.00 12.16 0.00 12.16 101193 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 128 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041140 107240541 001 - 421070. 651110 -00000 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 100826 SUPPLIES 10041232 108150651 126 - 138333 - 651110 -33725 0.00 17.92 0.00 17.92 102982 SUPPLIES 10041560 109100507 408 - 210155 - 651110 -00000 0.00 10.19- 0.00 10.19- 101072 SUPPLIES 10041562 108240586 113 - 138931. 651110 -00000 0.00 16.34 0.00 16.34 101429 SUPPLIES 10041666 108140598 001 - 454010 - 651110 -00000 0.00 375.00 0.00 375.00 101143 SUPPLIES 10041140 108270622 001 - 421070 - 651110 -00000 0.00 67.68 0.00 67.68 100826 SUPPLIES 10041231 108290665 001 - 100130 - 651110 -00000 0.00 183.95 0.00 183.95 102232 SUPPLIES 10041133 108200518 490 - 144610 - 651110 -00000 0.00 63.70 0.00 63.70 100069 SUPPLIES 10041407 108290681 408 - 253212 - 651110 -00000 0.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 100224 SUPPLIES 10041140 108270656 001. 421070 - 651110 -00000 0.00 23.00 0.00 23.00 100826 SUPPLIES 10041165 108280633 001 - 122240 - 651110 -00000 0.00 32.40 0.00 32.40 100015 SUPPLIES 10041229 108310510 408 - 253211. 651110 -00000 0.00 14.34 0.00 14.34 101628 SUPPLIES 10041227 109060513 408 - 210155 - 651110 -00000 0.00 176.55 0.00 176.55 101072 SUPPLIES 10041174 101230653 001 - 121152 - 651110.00000 0.00 86.50 0.00 86.50 101157 SUPPLIES 10041227 108280629 408 - 210155 - 651110 -00000 0.00 92.82 0.00 92.82 101072 SUPPLIES 10041232 108150651 126 - 138333 - 651110 -33204 0.00 53.74 0.00 53.74 102982 SUPPLIES 10041173 108240551 109 - 182900 - 651110.00000 0.00 31.50 0.00 31.50 100186 8/01 OFFICE SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 129 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041220 108310569 001. 157110- 651110 -00000 0.00 51.45 0.00 51.45 100421 SUPPLIES 10041576 109060584 113 - 138930 - 651110 -00000 0.00 178.00 0.00 178.00 100394 SUPPLIES 10041215 108160508 313. 163611 - 651110 -00000 0.00 27.48 0.00 27.48 100368 SUPPLIES 10041155 108270648 113 - 138312 - 651110.00000 0.00 179.78 0.00 179.78 100481 SUPPLIES 10041815 108290696 111 - 156349 - 651110 -00000 0.00 2.301.07 0.00 2,301.07 100881 SUPPLIES 10041563 101230505 001 - 000000- 142500 -00000 0.00 13.60 0.00 13.60 100647 SUPPLIES 10041227 108210675 408 - 210155 - 651110 -00000 0.00 14.12- 0.00 14.12- 101072 SUPPLIES 10041215 108080679 313 - 163611 - 651110 -00000 0.00 25.52 0.00 25.52 100368 SUPPLIES 10041576 108020619 113 - 138930 - 651110 -00000 0.00 217.41 0.00 217.41 100394 SUPPLIES 10041411 108310554 113. 138312 - 651110 -00000 0.00 60.49 0.00 60.49 100481 SUPPLIES 10041162 108270625 198 - 157410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 147.65 0.00 147.65 057780 SUPPLIES 10041168 108290590 408 - 253212 - 651110 -00000 0.00 138.00 0.00 138.00 100224 SUPPLIES 10041137 108130550 408 - 210125 - 651110 -00000 0.00 59.02 0.00 59.02 100241 SUPPLIES 10041576 107200554 113 - 138930. 651110 -00000 0.00 129.00 0.00 129.00 100394 SUPPLIES 10041576 106190611 113. 138930- 651110 -00000 0.00 47.88 0.00 47.88 100394 SUPPLIES 10041227 108270516 408 - 210155 - 651110.00000 0.00 79.81 0.00 79.81 101072 SUPPLIES 10041212 108270579 001 - 138710. 651110 -00000 0.00 65.39 0.00 65.39 100398 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041167 108280637 100163 SUPPLIES 10041227 108290597 101072 SUPPLIES 10041225 108300678 100917 SUPPLIES 10041227 108280665 101072 SUPPLIES 10041558 108230529 100398 SUPPLIES 10041172 109070601 100186 9/01 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10041158 107260540 100917 SUPPLIES 10041563 101230735 100647 SUPPLIES 10041223 108280507 100867 SUPPLIES 10041219 108280636 100871 SUPPLIES 10041135 108290556 100421 SUPPLIES 10041140 107220511 100826 SUPPLIES 10041577 108290508 101531 SUPPLIES 10041123 108280623 100868 SUPPLIES 10040216 103200536 PD 2X 101797 CREDIT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 97.34 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 408 - 210155. 651110 -00000 0.00 001. 155410- 651110 -00000 0.00 408 - 210155 - 651110.00000 0.00 001 - 138710. 651110 -00000 0.00 109 - 182601 - 651110 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 651110.00000 0.00 001. 000000- 142500 -00000 0.00 111 - 156310 - 651110 -00000 0.00 111 - 156313. 651110 -00000 0.00 001. 157110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 001 - 421070 - 651110 -00000 0.00 473 - 173413 - 651110 -00000 0.00 111 - 156341- 651110 -00000 0.00 470 - 173410. 651110 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558585 VENDOR 292200 - MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 10041230 108290558 470 - 173410 - 651110 -00000 101797 SUPPLIES 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 9.52 0.00 97.34 0.00 142.08 0.00 16.11- 0.00 12.29 0.00 71.12 0.00 199.00 0.00 9.23 0.00 11.96 0.00 38.96 0.00 138.20 0.00 9.72- 0.00 26.96 0.00 1,144.46 0.00 111.38- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 182.17 0.00 PAGE 130 VCHR NET 9.52 97.34 142.08 16.11- 12.29 71.12 199.00 9.23 11.96 38.96 138.20 9.72- 26.96 1,144.46 111.38- 16,170.65 182.17 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558118 VENDOR 12070 - MARCO TRUE VALUE, INC. 10041390 268359 470 - 173442 - 652990 -00000 0.00 8.99 0.00 106497 SUPPLIES 10041390 268181 470 - 173442 - 652990.00000 0.00 36.48 0.00 106497 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558451 VENDOR 234410 MARCY KRUMBINE 10041075 9/4 -7 TRVL M KRUMBINE 001 - 157110 - 640200 -00000 0.00 155.73 0.00 9/4.7 TRVL M KRUMBINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558793 VENDOR 344060 MARIE A. MALEBRANCHE 10042028 9/6/01 4 HRS 681- 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 19.50 681 - 431590 - 634402.00000 0.00 32.50 0.00 9/6/01 4 HRS MALEBRANCHE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558711 VENDOR 334100 - MARK E. PETRITES, MD 10040952 A,CAGE 06/26- 06/27/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 2,015.00 0.00 107550 A,CAGE 06/26- 06/27/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558838 VENDOR 900050 MARLENE J SANTILLI 212673 CANC PHA 111 PARC 65 605 - 000000- 220030 -00000 0.00 222.60 0.00 CANC PHASE 111 PAR 65 DEP OF 6/28/98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558839 VENDOR 900050 MARVIN DEVELOPMENT CORP 212653 REF 286722 MARVIN DEV 113. 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 REF 286722 MARVIN DEV CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558749 VENDOR 341420 MARY TORO SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041572 8/15 -30 TRVL M TORO 001 - 178985- 640200 -00000 0.00 71.34 0.00 8/15 -30 TRVL M TORO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558626 VENDOR 312600 MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT ACCOUNT 10041864 PP #26 001. 000000 - 218810 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558393 VENDOR 197040 MATRIX MEDICAL 10041386 752141 490 - 144610. 646970 -00000 0.00 641.37 0.00 106138 REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558116 VENDOR 11640 MATTHEW BENDER 10041393 12550256 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 122.60 0.00 58836 FAMILY PRACTICE MANUAL 10041712 6450643001/10896317 001. 432030 - 654110 -00000 0.00 289.56 0.00 59017 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558117 VENDOR 11700 MATULAYS CONTRACTORS SUPPLY 10038808 301248 109 - 182901. 652990 -00000 0.00 51.96 0.00 58376 - SMALL TOOLS,DRILL BITS.MASKS 10040960 301594 313. 163611 - 652990 -00000 0.00 133.96 0.00 ENGINEER RULERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558518 VENDOR 266470 - MAYO CLINIC WOMEN'S HEALTH SOURCE 10041725 RENEWAL D MITCHELL 681 - 410510. 654110 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 59004 RENEWAL D MITCHELL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558123 VENDOR 12200 - MCCONNELLS TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 10041382 160606 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 9.26 0.00 105640 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 133 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041382 160358 001 - 122240 - 652987 -00000 0.00 32.47 0.00 32.47 105640 SUPPLIES 10041384 160536 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 9.70 0.00 9.70 100636 SUPPLIES 10041382 160441 001. 122240 - 652989 -00000 0.00 96.52 0.00 96.52 105640 SUPPLIES 10041711 160578 001 - 122240 - 652990.00000 0.00 15.04 0.00 15.04 105640 SUPPLIES 10041385 A11462 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 8.70 0.00 8.70 105640 SUPPLIES 10041385 160456 001 - 122240 - 652990.00000 0.00 2.65 0.00 2.65 105640 SUPPLIES 10041382 160674 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 19.78 0.00 19.78 105640 SUPPLIES 10041708 160365 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 25.16 0.00 25.16 100590 SUPPLIES 10041711 160502 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 11.48 0.00 11.48 105640 SUPPLIES 10040954 160542 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 78.26 111. 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 2.69 0.00 80.95 100590 SUPPLIES 10041385 160566 001 - 122240 - 652987 -00000 0.00 10.24 0.00 10.24 105640 SUPPLIES 10041707 160426 408 - 233352. 652910 -00000 0.00 51.37 0.00 51.37 100531 SUPPLIES 10041708 160425 111. 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 12.59 0.00 12.59 100590 SUPPLIES 10041717 160500 408 - 210130 - 652990 -00000 0.00 35.16 0.00 35.16 101434 SUPPLIES 10041385 160483 001 - 122240. 652987 -00000 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 105640 SUPPLIES 10041384 160537 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 11.69 0.00 11.69 100636 SUPPLIES 10041382 160648 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 15.52 0.00 15.52 105640 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6J 1 PAGE 134 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041708 160577 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 15.01 111 - 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 17.88 0.00 32.89 100590 SUPPLIES 10041382 160679 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 3.32 0.00 3.32 105640 SUPPLIES 10040964 160439 521- 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 2.42 0.00 2.42 100129HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10041382 160632 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 22.62 0.00 22.62 105640 SUPPLIES 10041704 160529 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 23.36 0.00 23.36 100129 SUPPLIES 10041706 160362 001- 172930 - 652990 -00000 0.00 5.66 0.00 5.66 100277 SUPPLIES 10041710 160595 111 - 138911. 652910 -00000 0.00 47.68 0.00 47.68 103170 SUPPLIES 10041705 160575 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 16.49 0.00 16.49 100225 SUPPLIES 10041385 160460 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 10.13 0.00 10.13 105640 SUPPLIES 10041384 160450 001. 156363- 652910.00000 0.00 11.69 001 - 156363. 652990 -00000 0.00 2.69 0.00 14.38 100636 SUPPLIES 10041704 160531 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 7.72 0.00 7.72 100129 SUPPLIES 10041709 160475 111 - 156313 - 652910 -00000 0.00 32.38 0.00 32.38 101221 SUPPLIES 10040964 160471 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 4.50 0.00 4.50 100129HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10041704 160546 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 3.93 0.00 3.93 100129 SUPPLIES 10041382 160664 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 14.75 0.00 14.75 105640 SUPPLIES 10041709 160410 111 - 156313 - 652910 -00000 0.00 11.68 0.00 11.68 101221 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041384 160478 100636 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558840 VENDOR 900050 - MCCULLOUGH CONSTRUCTION 212654 REF BAL DEP MCCULLOUGH 670 - 000000 - 220113 -00000 REF BAL DEP MCCULLOUGH 8/4/98 CHECK NO 558675 VENDOR 326750 - MCDONALD TRANSIT ASSOCIATES, INC. 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 21.53 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 24,572.01 CHECK TOTAL 10042026 8U01 126 - 138333. 634999 -33247 0.00 126 - 138333 - 634999 -33725 0.00 126 - 138333 - 634999.33204 0.00 102999 TRANSIT SYSTEM 8/01 CHECK NO 558120 VENDOR 12140 - MCGEE AND ASSOCIATES 10040984 103544 -0901 US 41 111 - 163646 - 631403 -60039 0.00 103544 EAST PART B 9/01 0.00 10041812 4924.2 CC RRW 104924 9/01 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 104924 9/01 0.00 10041365 CCTS /DB MTQ 101196 1001 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 101196 10 /01 0.00 10041362 CCTS PRSE 100857 1001 111. 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 100857 10 /01 0.00 10041366 US41 PHASE B 103539 0901B 111 - 163646 - 631403 -60039 0.00 103539 WO TS PW 011 0.00 10041364 LELY 100915 0901 152 - 162541 - 631403 -00000 100915 9/01/01 10041365 1011960901 DAVIS BLVD LRD 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 101196 9/01 10040355 CHIP SHOT 100824 0901 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 100824 9/01 10041366 US41 PHASE A 103539 0901A 111 - 163646 - 631403 -60039 103539 PHASE A 0.00 12.269.82 36.809.45 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 135 VCHR NET 21.53 724.08 24,572.01 24,572.01 49,079.27 49,079.27 0.00 6,165.00 0.00 6,165.00 0.00 3,100.00 0.00 3.100.00 0.00 985.00 0.00 985.00 0.00 895.00 0.00 895.00 0.00 3,750.00 0.00 3,750.00 0.00 695.00 0.00 695.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 880.00 0.00 880.00 0.00 3,105.00 0.00 3,105.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041810 1008230901 GGMSTD /MSTULRD 100823 8/01 10041363 IMB 100874 -0901 100874 TS MA 0103 10041361 IMM RD 100856 1001 100856 IMM RD 100856 1001 10041405 FIDDLER CREEK 100860 1001 100860 9/01 10041813 CCTS /AR -MTQ 1008499 -0901 100849 9/01 10041367 1051320901 DAVIS BLVD 1 R 105132 9/01 10041365 CCTS DB 101196 0901 101196 9/01 10041364 LELY 100915 1001 100915 10 /01 10041813 CCTS /AR -MTQ 1008499 -1001 100849 10 /01 10041405 FIDDLER CREEK 100860 0901 100860 9/01 10041366 US41 PHASE B 103539 0901B 103539 PHASE B 10041362 CCTS PRSE 100857 0901 100857 9/01 10041361 IMM RD 100856 0901 100856 9/01 10041406 GG 100823 0901 100823 9/01 10041363 IMB 100874 -1001 100874 TS MA 0103 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111- 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 111. 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403.60098 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403.00000 0.00 152. 162541 - 631403 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403 -60039 0.00 111. 163646- 631403 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403.00000 0.00 111 - 163646. 631403 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558277 VENDOR 144810 - MCMASTER -CARR 10040958 45635824 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 102588 PAINT MARKERS 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 2,800.00 0.00 750.00 0.00 265.00 0.00 260.00 0.00 887.50 0.00 3,400.00 0.00 887.50 0.00 870.00 0.00 895.00 0.00 695.00 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 887.50 0.00 740.00 0.00 887.50 0.00 620.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 42.37 0.00 PAGE 136 VCHR NET 2,800.00 750.00 265.00 260.00 887.50 3,400.00 887.50 870.00 895.00 695.00 1,400.00 887.50 740.00 887.50 620.00 37,020.00 42.37 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 137 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.37 CHECK NO 558758 VENDOR 342730 MED -VET INTERNATIONAL 10040981 08011932 001- 155410 - 652720 -00000 0.00 395.00 001. 155410 - 641950 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 400.00 UNDERPAD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400.00 CHECK NO 558604 VENDOR 303130 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL 10041811 IV824348 490 - 144610 - 644650 -00000 0.00 2,553.00 0.00 2,553.00 100328 MAINTENANCE 10041811 IV533649 490 - 144610 - 644650.00000 0.00 149.00- 0.00 149.00- 100328 CREDIT MEMO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,404.00 CHECK NO 558220 VENDOR 115820 MERCHANTS ASSN CREDIT BUREAU INC. 10041703 08095004 490 - 144618 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.55 0.00 1.55 59079 TRACE REPORT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.55 CHECK NO 558526 VENDOR 271720 MERIDIAN BROADCASTING. INC. 10041726 8291 -01 111 - 156341 - 648170 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 57811 J CONRAD 8126/01 10041727 8281.01 111 - 156341. 648170.00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 56508 8/24/01 R BACHMAN 10041727 7650 111. 156341- 648170 -00000 0.00 180.00 0.00 180.00 56508 ADVERTISING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 480.00 CHECK NO 558044 VENDOR 194880 METRO DADE POLICE 10041050 98 4628 001 - 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 21.00 0.00 21.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.00 CHECK NO 558046 VENDOR 194880 METRO DADE POLICE 10041059 98 4340 001 - 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 AND SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558045 VENDOR 194880 METRO DADE POLICE 10041056 98 3293 001 - 013010 - 649040.00000 0.00 84.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558047 VENDOR 194880 METRO DADE POLICE 10041060 97 1188 001 - 013010. 649040 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558048 VENDOR 194880 METRO DADE POLICE 10041064 98 4603 001 - 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 21.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558226 VENDOR 118890 METRO ICE, INC. 10041730 10599 111 - 156395. 652990 -00000 0.00 115.00 0.00 58674 ICE 10041728 11538 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 115.00 0.00 58254 ICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558430 VENDOR 218750 - METROPOLITAN LIFE 10041853 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 217700 -00000 0.00 2.803.60 001 - 000000 - 217710 -00000 0.00 600.00 001 - 000000. 217720 -00000 0.00 507.37 PP #26 001 - 000000- 217730.00000 0.00 173.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558323 VENDOR 165080 - MICHAEL J. PROVOST 10041358 00- 1216CFA -DRM K,ROYAL 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 158.74 00- 1216CFA -DRM K,ROYLE TRAVEL EXPSPE 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558431 VENDOR 220520 - MICHAEL S. FLYNN, M.D. 10041341 M,MOUNT 08/29/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 08/29/01 M,MOUNT 10041341 R,VIOLETTE 09/01/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 09/01/01 R,VIOLETTE CHECK NO 558644 VENDOR 318910 MICHAEL T. HAVIG, MD 0.00 10041340 K,COWART 08/14/01 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 0.00 08/14/01 K,COWART 286.00 0.00 286.00 CHECK NO 558124 VENDOR 12620 MICHAEL W. NYCUM, M.D. 0.00 10041339 C,FERNANDEZ 08/22/01 0.00 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 0.00 08/22/01 C,FERNANDEZ 509.83 0.00 509.83 10040951 J,WITHROW 08/07/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 107551 J,WITHROW 08/07/01 CHECK NO 558656 VENDOR 323000 - MICHELLE DORALUS 10041721 9/12/01 3 HRS 681. 431590- 634402 -00000 0.00 9/12/01 3 HRS DORALUS 10041721 9/10/01 4 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 9/10/01 4 HRS DORALUS 10041721 9/11/01 4.5 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 9/11/01 4.5 HRS DORALUS CHECK NO 558411 VENDOR 205860 - MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 10040953 361794 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 107490 VIDEO CASSETTES 10041377 366314 001 - 156150 - 652670 -00000 0.00 107489 VIDEOCASSETTES 10040953 370714 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 107490 VIDEO CASSETTES 16JI PAGE 139 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 45.50 0.00 45.50 26.00 0.00 26.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 71.50 286.00 0.00 286.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 286.00 389.35 0.00 389.35 1,644.50 0.00 1.644.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,033.85 48.00 0.00 48.00 64.00 0.00 64.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 184.00 569.75 0.00 569.75 1.354.64 0.00 1.354.64 509.83 0.00 509.83 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10040953 362846 355 - 156190 - 652670.00000 0.00 569.81 0.00 107490 VIDEO CASSETTES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558291 VENDOR 151250 - MITY -LITE INC. 10042025 384315 306 - 116360. 652910 -00165 0.00 0.00 368 - 116360. 652910 -00165 0.00 15.280.48 0.00 106554 FURNITURE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558125 VENDOR 12900 MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORP 10041714 859 - 271 -078 -7 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 815.79 0.00 100107 SEPT BILLING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558303 VENDOR 159310 MODERN RECYCLING INC. 10041698 1145 472 - 173423 - 634999 -00000 0.00 297.50 0.00 105232 TIRE RECYCLING 10042023 1104176 472 - 173423 - 634999 -00000 0.00 7.595.00 0.00 107731 TIRE CRUMBS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558611 VENDOR 305500 - MORGAN MEDICAL CORP 107567 D BROWN 7/18/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 585.00 0.00 107567 D BROWN 7/18/01 107567 K COWART 8/3/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 747.50 0.00 107567 K COWART 8/3/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558491 VENDOR 257030 - MULLER- THOMPSON FUNERAL CHAPEL 10041699 S THOMAS 9/1/01 001 - 155930 - 634150 -00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 59045 S THOMAS 9/1/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558126 VENDOR 13000 - MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & SIGN CO 10040356 074411 101. 163630 - 653710 -00000 0.00 947.50 0.00 106845 SIGN POSTS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10040501 074412 101 - 163630. 653710 -00000 0.00 1.912.50 0.00 107059 SIGN SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558390 VENDOR 195160 - MYRON MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 10041713 6219984/34770743 408 - 233350- 652990.00000 0.00 413.22 0.00 57077 POCKET PAL DIARIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558295 VENDOR 155630 NACO /SOUTHEAST 10041848 PP #26 001.000000- 217001 -00000 0.00 29.239.36 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558803 VENDOR 900030 NANCY SIEMION 212602 7/18 -21 TRVL N SIEMION 113 - 138312 - 640300 -00000 0.00 75.75 0.00 7/18 -21 TRVL N SIEMIOM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558657 VENDOR 323300 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10041394 962877 408 - 233312 - 652410 -00000 0.00 177.13 0.00 101682 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558361 VENDOR 180690 NAPLES AIR FORCE 10040975 533624 518 - 121630.652990 -00000 0.00 230.12 0.00 PROMOTIONAL GIFTS FOR PEAK FITNESS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558127 VENDOR 13080 NAPLES ARMATURE WORKS 10041400 61004 408 - 253221 - 655100.00000 0.00 33.75 0.00 102002 MOTOR PARTS AND FITTINGS 10040961 61009 001- 172930 - 652990 -00000 0.00 20.51 0.00 056279 PARTS 10041400 60931 408 - 253221 - 655100 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 102002 MOTOR PARTS AND FITTINGS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 142 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041400 60959 408. 253221- 655100 -00000 0.00 93.90 0.00 93.90 102002 MOTOR PARTS AND FITTINGS 10040961 60963 001 - 172930 - 652990 -00000 0.00 75.24 0.00 75.24 056279 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 259.40 CHECK NO 558128 VENDOR 13200 - NAPLES CAR WASH 10041397 CAR WASHES 8/01 521 - 122410. 646415 -00000 0.00 686.95 0.00 686.95 104845 CAR WASHES 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 686.95 CHECK NO 558129 VENDOR 13230 - NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 10042024 2/4- 2/29/00 G TOWNSEND 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 1,834.03 0.00 1,834.03 2/4- 2/29/00 G TOWNSEND 107402 10042024 3/1- 3/21/00 G TOWNSEND 001- 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 6,296.64 0.00 6,296.64 3/1- 3/21/00 G TOWNSEND 107402 10042024 4/5- 4/21/00 G TOWNSEND 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 2,299.30 0.00 2,299.30 4/5- 4/21/00 G TOWNSEND 107402 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10,429.97 CHECK NO 558130 VENDOR 13250 - NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 10041732 MERRITT FIRE 4/11- 4/18/00 001 - 144209- 634999.00000 0.00 9,036.76 0.00 9,036.76 107269 MERRITT FIRE 4/11. 4/18/00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,036.76 CHECK NO 558255 VENDOR 132380 - NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 10041378 G COLE 6/8/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 762.08 0.00 762.08 107591 G COLE 6/8/01 10041380 A MCGEE 7/1- 7/31/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 314.50 0.00 314.50 107575 A MCGEE 7/1- 7/31/01 10041380 T VOSBURGH 3/15/01 001. 155930- 634101 -00000 0.00 762.08 0.00 762.08 107575 T VOSBURGH 3/15/01 10041379 A HUNT 3/1- 3/31/01 001. 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 4,034.27 0.00 4,034.27 107617 A HUNT 3/1. 3/31/01 10041380 E PINEDA 7/17/01 001. 155930- 634101 -00000 0.00 762.08 0.00 762.08 107575 E PINEDA 7/17/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 143 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041378 C EMERTON 7/11- 7/31/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 172.30 0.00 172.30 107591 C EMERTON 7/11- 7/30/01 10041380 S NIESEN 5/26/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 48.69 0.00 48.69 107575 S NIESEN 5/26/01 10041380 D SAYRE 6/1- 6/30/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 226.50 0.00 226.50 107575 D SAYRE 6/1. 6/30/01 10041380 B JONES 3/1- 3/31/01 001 - 155930. 634101 -00000 0.00 561.25 0.00 561.25 107575 B JONES 3/1- 3/31/01 10041378 R AUSTIN 2/26/01 001 - 155930 - 634101.00000 0.00 206.25 0.00 206.25 R AUSTIN 2/26/01 107591 10041380 M VIGEANT 6/21/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 136.43 0.00 136.43 107575 M VIGEANT 6/21/01 10041378 V BLACK 5/7/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 762.08 0.00 762.08 107591 V BLACK 5/7/01 107591 10041380 J SERRANO 6/28/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 762.08 0.00 762.08 107575 J SERRANO 6/28/01 10041378 B KELLY 5/18/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 617.83 0.00 617.83 107591 B KELLY 5/18/01 10041380 E PINEDA 3/8/01 001. 155930- 634101 -00000 0.00 762.08 0.00 762.08 107575 E PINEDA 3/8/01 10041379 J POWERS 1/30/01 001. 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 1,166.25 0.00 1,166.25 107617 J POWERS 1/30/01 10041380 B JONES 4/1- 4/30/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 936.25 0.00 936.25 107575 B JONES 4/1- 4/30/01 10041380 A MCGEE 6/1- 6/30/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 386.23 0.00 386.23 107575 A MCGEE 6/1- 6/30/01 10041378 A DURAN 2/1/01- 2/28/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 2,821.20 0.00 2,821.20 107591 A DURAN 2/1- 2/28/01107591 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.200.43 CHECK NO 558497 VENDOR 259460 - NAPLES COURT REPORTING, INC. 10041391 T -2352 681. 410310 - 633063 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 R ROE 99 1034 10041391 6732 -2 681 - 410310 - 633051 -00000 0.00 11.20 0.00 11.20 A GODWIN 00 2799 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558214 VENDOR 115170 - NAPLES CUSTOM HITCH & TRAILER SALES 10041399 43870 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 7024 PARTS 10041398 44001 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 103347 PARTS 10041398 44082 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 103347 PARTS CHECK NO 558133 VENDOR 13300 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 10040965 1933941 001 - 138710 - 649100 -00000 0.00 LEGAL CLASSIFIED AD 0.00 10041373 1928464 111. 138317 - 649100 -00000 100448 ADVERTISING 0.00 10041374 1928449 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 100480 ADVERTISING 0.00 10040972 1932854 113 - 138910 - 649100 -00000 0.00 AMEND ORDINANCE NOTICE 0.00 10041373 1900795 111. 138317 - 649100 -00000 0.00 100448 ADVERTISING 0.00 10041383 1933938 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 100480 ADVERTISING 0.00 10040957 1930083/050862 681 - 421510 - 648160 -00000 0.00 100775 ADS 0.00 10041374 1928445 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 100480 ADVERTISING 0.00 10040968 1933124 001 - 122240 - 649100 -00000 0.00 058930 ADS 0.00 10041373 1923074 111 - 138317- 649100 -00000 100448 ADVERTISING 10040973 1932853 001 - 121810- 648160 -00000 058874 ADS 16JI PAGE 144 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 74.20 0.00 70.24 0.00 70.24 0.00 14.40 0.00 14.40 0.00 3.37 0.00 3.37 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 88.01 0.00 141.16 0.00 141.16 0.00 41.61 0.00 41.61 0.00 144.57 0.00 144.57 0.00 290.43 0.00 290.43 0.00 41.61 0.00 41.61 0.00 183.55 0.00 183.55 0.00 284.20 0.00 284.20 0.00 208.92 0.00 208.92 0.00 108.50 0.00 108.50 0.00 41.61 0.00 41.61 0.00 178.89 0.00 178.89 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 145 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041383 1933939 113- 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 170.99 0.00 170.99 100480 ADVERTISING 10040971 1933943 001 - 138710 - 649100 -00000 0.00 123.89 0.00 123.89 LEGAL ADS 10041373 1794736 111 - 138317 - 649100 -00000 0.00 37.18 0.00 37.18 100448 ADVERTISING 10041374 1928448 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 211.78 0.00 211.78 100480 ADVERTISING 10041374 1928447 113 - 138312 - 649100.00000 0.00 233.23 0.00 233.23 100480 ADVERTISING 10040956 1928692 126 - 138332 - 649100 -33202 0.00 41.61 0.00 41.61 106212 ADVERTISING 10040982 1932856 101 - 163610 - 649100.00000 0.00 156.01 0.00 156.01 100469 ADS 10041374 1928444 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 138.85 0.00 138.85 100480 ADVERTISING 10040966 1933942 001. 138710 - 649100 -00000 0.00 120.75 0.00 120.75 LEGAL CLASSIFIED AD 10041373 1904761 111 - 138317. 649100 -00000 0.00 41.61 0.00 41.61 100448 ADVERTISING 10041373 1926558 111 - 138317 - 649100 -00000 0.00 41.61 0.00 41.61 100448 ADVERTISING 10040968 1933123 001 - 122240 - 649100 -00000 0.00 91.75 0.00 91.75 058930 ADS 10041723 1937066 001. 010510 - 649100.00000 0.00 140.30 0.00 140.30 101958 LEGAL ADVERTISING 10040973 1932855 001. 121810 - 648160 -00000 0.00 191.76 0.00 191.76 058874 ADS 10041383 1933940 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 166.28 0.00 166.28 100480 ADVERTISING 10041373 1898721 111. 138317 - 649100 -00000 0.00 128.70 0.00 128.70 100448 ADVERTISING 10040950 1930521. 055786 001 - 100130. 648160 -00000 0.00 4,503.51 0.00 4.503.51 102611 ADS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041373 1917880 111. 138317. 649100 -00000 0.00 3,140.28 0.00 100448 ADVERTISING 10041373 1901582 111 - 138317 - 649100.00000 0.00 153.15 0.00 100448 ADVERTISING 10041374 1928446 113 - 138312- 649100 -00000 0.00 147.43 0.00 100480 ADVERTISING 10041373 1913317 111 - 138317 - 649100.00000 0.00 41.61 0.00 100448 ADVERTISING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558134 VENDOR 13310 NAPLES DAILY NEWS 10041731 45096 307 - 156110 - 652650 -00000 0.00 190.19 0.00 59153 SUBSCRIPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558192 VENDOR 108150 NAPLES DAILY NEWS 10040969 1934556 001 - 121710 - 648160 -00000 0.00 72.08 0.00 CLASSIFIED AD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558645 VENDOR 319160 NAPLES DAILY NEWS 10040970 1933923 001 - 155110 - 649100 -00000 0.00 103.48 0.00 LEGAL AD FOR HEALTHCARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558678 VENDOR 326860 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 10040974 1932857 195 - 110406. 649100 -10266 0.00 137.42 0.00 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING 10040983 1928683 413 - 263611 - 649100 -73949 0.00 74.50 0.00 LEGAL AD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558135 VENDOR 13330 - NAPLES DAY SURGERY 10041372 R RABASSA 7/26/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 845.00 0.00 107630 R RABASSA 7/26/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041372 E TORRES 9/6/01 107630 E TORRES 9/6/01 10041372 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 107630 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 CHECK NO 558136 VENDOR 13340 - NAPLES DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING 10041376 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI 17641 PAGE 147 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10041376 B DRILICH 7/18/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 ANIMAL SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 10041376 B DRILICH 7/18/01 001 - 155930. 631990.00000 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 0.00 10041371 A TOGHER 7/27/01 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 845.00 0.00 845.00 001 - 155930. 634101 -00000 0.00 1,131.00 0.00 1,131.00 0.00 10041371 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.821.00 CHECK NO 558136 VENDOR 13340 - NAPLES DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING 10041376 D CULHANE 8/1/01 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 17641 107593 D CULHANE 8/1/01 0.00 10041376 B DRILICH 7/18/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 ANIMAL 107593 B DRILICH 7/18/01 0.00 10041376 B DRILICH 7/18/01 001 - 155930. 631990.00000 0.00 107593 B DRILICH 7/18/01 0.00 10041371 A TOGHER 7/27/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 107636 A TOGHER 7/27/01 16801 10041371 S NICHOLS 8/23/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 107636 S NICHOLS 8/23/01 ANIMAL 10041371 T SANDERS 8/23/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 107636 T SANDERS 8/23/01 0.00 10041371 G TARVIN 8/16/01 001 - 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 107636 G TARVIN 8/16/01 0.00 10041376 L CASTILLO 7/6/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 107593 L CASTILLO 7/6/01 0.00 CHECK NO 558137 VENDOR 13370 - NAPLES FEED & SEED, INC. 10041389 17641 384.80 0.00 001. 155410 - 652210 -00000 0.00 101555 ANIMAL SUPPLIES 0.00 10041388 17630 318.50 0.00 001- 156363. 652255 -00000 0.00 101394 ANIMAL SUPPLIES 0.00 10041388 16801 715.00 0.00 001 - 156363 - 652255 -00000 0.00 101394 ANIMAL SUPPLIES 0.00 CHECK NO 558138 VENDOR 13380 - NAPLES FERTILIZER & SUPPLY 0.00 596.05 0.00 596.05 0.00 384.80 0.00 384.80 0.00 715.00 0.00 715.00 0.00 1,446.25 0.00 1,446.25 0.00 318.50 0.00 318.50 0.00 149.50 0.00 149.50 0.00 715.00 0.00 715.00 0.00 1,010.75 0.00 1,010.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,335.85 0.00 281.95 0.00 281.95 0.00 49.40 0.00 49.40 0.00 52.80 0.00 52.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 384.15 CHECK NO 558190 VENDOR 107670 - NAPLES PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES 10041342 M,WALOEN 06/15/01 001- 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 5.20 0.00 5.20 06/15/01 M,WALOEN 10041342 V,NITTOLO 06/08/01 001. 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 06/08/01 V,NITTOLO SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 148 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10040967 007123 111- 163646 - 652310 -00000 0.00 61.95 0.00 61.95 LANDSCAPING SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 61.95 CHECK NO 558522 VENDOR 271100 - NAPLES HEART CENTER 10041343 L,KODAK 08/28 -29/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 266.50 0.00 266.50 MEDICAL SERVICES L,KODAK 08/28 -29/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 266.50 CHECK NO 558197 VENDOR 108550 - NAPLES MEDICAL CENTER 10041370 A MCGEE 8/22/01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 40.95 0.00 40.95 107637 A MCGEE 8/22/01 10041370 C JONES 5/1- 5/2/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 261.30 0.00 261.30 107637 C JONES 5/1- 5/2/01 10041370 J DISTEL 8/14/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 99.45 0.00 99.45 107637 J DISTEL 8/14/01 10041370 R RODRIGUEZ 1 /10 /01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 57.20 0.00 57.20 107637 R RODRIGUEZ 1 /10 /01 10041370 T SANDERS 8/27/01 001- 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 1,415.70 0.00 1,415.70 107637 T SANDERS 8/27/01 10041370 L CONLEY 8/28/01 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 60.45 0.00 60.45 107637 L CONLEY 8/28/01 10041370 R RODRIGUEZ 12/13 1 /10 /01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 98.15 0.00 98.15 107637 R RODRIGUEZ 12/13 1 /10 /01 10041370 R VIOLETTE 8/10/01 001 - 155930. 631210.00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 29.25 107637 R VIOLETTE 8/10/01 10041370 T SANDERS 8/20/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 75.40 0.00 75.40 107637 T SANDERS 8120101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,137.85 CHECK NO 558190 VENDOR 107670 - NAPLES PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES 10041342 M,WALOEN 06/15/01 001- 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 5.20 0.00 5.20 06/15/01 M,WALOEN 10041342 V,NITTOLO 06/08/01 001. 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 06/08/01 V,NITTOLO SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 149 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041342 C,ORTEGA 08/08,10,12/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 224.15 0.00 224.15 08/08,10,12/01 C,ORTEGA 10041342 R,NAVARRO 03/14/01 001 - 155930. 631990 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 03/14/01 R,NAVARRO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 359.35 CHECK NO 558140 VENDOR 13700 - NAPLES RADIOLOGISTS 10041369 R VIOLETTE 8/10/01 001 - 155930. 631990 -00000 0.00 78.00 0.00 78.00 107638 R VIOLETTE 8/10/01 10041369 C CINTRON 5/16. 5/18/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 331.50 0.00 331.50 107638 C CINTRON 5/16 - 5/18/01 10041369 R GRIFFIN 8/22/01 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 18.20 0.00 18.20 107638 R GRIFFIN 8/22/01 10041369 A TOGHER 2/13/01 001- 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 91.00 0.00 91.00 107638 A TOGHER 2/13/01 10041369 R GRIFFIN 8/23 - 8/24/01 001. 155930. 631990 -00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 107638 R GRIFFIN 8/23- 8/24/01 10041369 A TOGHER 4/22/01 001. 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 18.20 0.00 18.20 107638 A TOGHER 4/22/01 10041369 A TOGHER 4/5/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 91.00 0.00 91.00 107638 A TOGHER 4/5/01 10041369 M FARRILL 5/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 102.05 0.00 102.05 107638 M FARRILL 5/26/01 10041369 R VIOLETTE 8/12/01 001 - 155930. 631990 -00000 0.00 71.50 0.00 71.50 107638 R VIOLETTE 8/12/01 10041369 R VIOLETTE 8/13/01 001 - 155930. 631990.00000 0.00 18.20 0.00 18.20 107638 R VIOLETTE 8/13/01 10041369 B DRILICH 8/29/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 107638 B DRILICH 8/29/01 10041369 J VEENSCHOOTEN 7/28/01 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 234.00 0.00 234.00 107638 J VEENSCHOOTEN 7/28/01 10041369 8/14/01 001. 155930- 631990.00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 107638 R VIOLETTE 8/14/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,131.65 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558287 VENDOR 150000 - NAPLES SCOREKEEPERS ASSOCIATION 10041806 9/10- 9/21/01 MENS SOFTBAL 111 - 156341 - 634999 -00000 0.00 102137 SOFTBALL 10041806 8/1- 8/27/01 SOFTBALL 111 - 156341 - 634999 -00000 0.00 102137 SOFTBALL CHECK NO 558766 VENDOR 343310 - NCTRC 10040976 48842 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE FEE 16JI PAGE 150 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 904.00 0.00 904.00 424.00 0.00 424.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.328.00 111 - 156341 - 654210 -00000 0.00 65.00 CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 558841 VENDOR 900050 - NELSON MARINE 212651 REF 267834 NELSON MARINE 113 - 138900 - 341275.00000 0.00 REF 267834 NELSON MARINE 212650 REF 267834 NELSON MARINE 113 - 138900- 343901 -00000 0.00 REF 267834 NELSON MARINE CHECK NO 558643 VENDOR 318580 - NEUBERT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 25.00 10042096 #1 (RETAINAGE) 473 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 0.00 105608 TO 8/31/01 (RETAINAGE) 424.45- 0.00 10042096 #1 473 - 173411. 634999 -00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 105608 TO 8/31/01 3,820.08 841.75 CHECK NO 558466 VENDOR 248010 - NEUROSCIENCE & SPINE ASSOCIATION 247.00 10041368 8/23/01 R BURNS 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 94.25 8/23/01 R BURNS 107639 0.00 133.90 10041368 6/23- 25,27/99 K BROWN 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 6/23- 25,27/99 K BROWN 107639 10041368 S GONZALEZ VALEZ 7/20/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 S GONZALEZ VALEZ 7/20/01 107639 10041368 8/24 - 8/28/01 J MCDAVITT 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 8/24 - 8/28/01 J MCDAVITT 107639 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.025.00 424.45- 0.00 424.45- 4,244.53 0.00 4,244.53 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,820.08 841.75 0.00 841.75 247.00 0.00 247.00 94.25 0.00 94.25 133.90 0.00 133.90 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 151 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041368 7/21. 7/22/99 K BROWN 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 123.50 0.00 123.50 7/21. 7/22/99 K BROWN 107639 10041368 6/28- 6/29/99 K BROWN 001- 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 123.50 0.00 123.50 6/28- 6/29/99 K BROWN 107639 10041368 6/30/99 K BROWN 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 4,875.00 0.00 4,875.00 6/30/99 K BROWN 107639 10041368 6/22/99 K BROWN 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 193.05 0.00 193.05 6/22/99 K BROWN 107639 10041368 6/30/99 K BROWN 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 845.00 0.00 845.00 6/30/99 K BROWN 107639 10041368 A GREENMAN 8/30/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 62.40 0.00 62.40 107639 A GREENMAN 8/30/01 10041368 8/24/01 J MCDAVITT 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 94.90 0.00 94.90 8/24/01 J MCDAVITT 107639 10041368 K COWART 8/20/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,268.80 0.00 1,268.80 K COWART 8/20/01 107639 10041368 8/31/01 R BURNS 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 82.55 0.00 82.55 8/31/01 R BURNS 107639 10041368 7/20/99 K BROWN 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 116.35 0.00 116.35 7/20/99 K BROWN 107639 10041368 8/28/01 R BURNS 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 8/28/01 R BURNS 107639 10041368 7/23- 7/24/99 K BROWN 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 134.55 0.00 134.55 7/23- 7/24/99 K BROWN 107639 10041368 B MILLS 6/13/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 55.25 0.00 55.25 B MILLS 6/13/01 107639 10041368 9/5/01 J MCDAVITT 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 78.65 0.00 78.65 9/5/01 J MCDAVITT 107639 10041368 N VENABLE 8/27/01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 29.25 N VENABLE 8/27/01 10041368 D BEAN 8/29/01 001 - 155930- 631210.00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 107639 D BEAN 8/29/01 10041368 A MCGEE 2/15- 2/19/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 128.70 0.00 128.70 A MCGEE 2/15- 2/19/01 107639 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 152 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041368 S NEWELL 8/27/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 110.50 0.00 110.50 S NEWELL 8/27/01 107639 10041368 A GREENMAN 8/23/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,119.30 0.00 1,119.30 A GREENMAN 8/23/01 107639 10041368 8/27/01 J MCDAVITT 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 74.75 0.00 74.75 8/27/01 J MCDAVITT 107639 10041368 8/29/01 R BURNS 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 63.70 0.00 63.70 8/29/01 R BURNS 107639 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10,974.60 CHECK NO 558756 VENDOR 342530 - NEW ENGLAND SERUM COMPANY 10041338 P1110133001 001- 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 341.82 0.00 341.82 LEASHES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 341.82 CHECK NO 558402 VENDOR 201540 NEW READERS PRESS 10041843 2811361 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 391.37 0.00 391.37 59147 LITERACY TITLES 10041842 2818706 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 50.07 0.00 50.07 59163 LITERACY TITLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 441.44 CHECK NO 558740 VENDOR 339580 NEW YORK SCU 10041863 PP #26 001 - 000000. 218810 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 CHECK NO 558575 VENDOR 286930 NEXTEL 10041807 4/15 - 5/14/01 0002099947 -0 473 - 173413 - 641700 -00000 0.00 619.94 470 - 173410 - 641700.00000 0.00 6.65 0.00 626.59 4/15 - 5/14/01 0002099947 -0 105695 10041807 6/15- 7/14/01 0002099947 -0 473 - 173413 - 641700 -00000 0.00 491.89 0.00 491.89 6/15- 7/14/01 0002099947 -0 105695 10041807 5/15- 6/14/01 0002099947 -0 473 - 173413 - 641700 -00000 0.00 224.01 470 - 173410 - 641700 -00000 0.00 278.33 0.00 502.34 5/15- 6/14/01 0002099947 -0 105695 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041401 0002176489 -9 8/7- 9/6/01 101545 8/7- 9/6/01 0002176489 -9 10041809 0002109182 -2 7/25- 8/24/01 100329 0002109182 -2 7/25 - 8/24/01 10041716 000211604.1 8/2- 9/1/01 105731 8/2- 9/1/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 118 - 144210 - 634999 -33791 0.00 490 - 144610 - 641700 -00000 0.00 492 - 144641 - 641700 -00000 0.00 001 - 443010 - 641700 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558624 VENDOR 310560 - NORA SEHEULT 322.54 0.00 10041722 9/10/01 3.5 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 0.00 1,123.33 209.92 681 - 431590 - 634402.00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 9/10/01 3.5 HRS SEHEULT 8.00 10041722 9/13/01 5 HRS 0.00 681- 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 0.00 9/13/01 5 HRS SEHEULT 0.00 136.00 CHECK NO 558142 VENDOR 14070 NORMAN J. DERY, CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10041344 A,FAISON 08/22/01 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 0.00 08/22/01 A,FAISON 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK NO 558141 VENDOR 14060 NORTH COLLIER ANIMAL CLINIC 0.00 10041396 01 8848 L PANZARELLA 0.00 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 106415 VET FEES 10041396 01 8497 R PUTIER 610- 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 106415 VET FEES 10041396 01 8498 R PUTIER 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 106415 VET FEES 10041396 01 8251 D YOUNG 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 106415 VET FEES CHECK NO 558676 VENDOR 326790 NORTH NAPLES VETERINARY HOSPITAL 10041395 01 8812 E KELLEY 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 103819 VET FEES 16JI PAGE 153 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 322.54 0.00 322.54 923.33 200.00 0.00 1,123.33 209.92 0.00 209.92 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,276.61 8.00 48.00 0.00 56.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 136.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 230.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 154 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 CHECK NO 558569 VENDOR 285170 - NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT 10041729 4990293 RI 111 - 156313 - 652910 -00000 0.00 439.21 0.00 439.21 058257 PORTABLE CANOPY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 439.21 CHECK NO 558438 VENDOR 226410 - NOTARY PUBLIC UNDERWRITERS INC. 10041404 BAL DUE E FROLOFF 408 - 210151 - 654210 -00000 0.00 79.00 0.00 79.00 058917 BAL DUE E FROLOFF CHECK TOTAL 0.00 79.00 CHECK NO 558454 VENDOR 237270 - NUCO2, INC. 10041402 NI13139748 111 - 156313 - 652311 -00000 0.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 101595 CO2 AND TANK RENTAL 10041402 NR 08397567 111 - 156313 - 644600 -00000 0.00 53.98 0.00 53.98 101595 CO2 AND TANK RENTAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 213.98 CHECK NO 558475 VENDOR 250350 OAKLAND COUNTY FRIEND OF THE COURT 10041868 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 218810 -00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 80.00 CHECK NO 558211 VENDOR 114770 OFFICE DEPOT 10041715 135475274 -001 001 - 121710 - 651930.00000 0.00 216.75 0.00 216.75 106523 FURNITURE 10040963 135468876 -001 001 - 121710- 651930.00000 0.00 469.95 0.00 469.95 106523 OFFICE SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 686.70 CHECK NO 558143 VENDOR 14140 - OFFICE FURNITURE & DESIGN 10040321 1568 001 - 121710- 651930 -00000 0.00 8,999.87 0.00 8,999.87 105483 OFFICE FURNITURE 10040321 1569 001 - 121710 - 651930 -00000 0.00 960.00 0.00 960.00 105483 OFFICE FURNITURE 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558572 VENDOR 285590 - OFFICE MAX 10040979 3279J241/601118001227258 001 - 155410. 652990.00000 0.00 18.98 0.00 CDRW PACK 10040357 940738/601118001227258 118- 144210. 651910 -33791 0.00 897.00 0.00 107297 PRINTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558269 VENDOR 139350 - OFFICE PAVILION 10040320 21659 113 - 138900 - 764310 -80532 0.00 42,861.34 0.00 106398 - FURNITURE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558364 VENDOR 182210 - OFFICE PAVILION 10040977 21622 681 - 421510 - 651930.00000 0.00 252.65 0.00 WALL SUPPORTS AND PARTS 10040199 21615 111 - 156313 - 651930 -00000 0.00 1,087.92 0.00 105491 FURNITURE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558731 VENDOR 338800 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 10041865 PP #26 001 - 000000. 218810 -00000 0.00 117.69 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558738 VENDOR 339380 ONESOURCE 10042022 9/24/01 001. 122220 - 634999 -00000 0.00 58,939.94 0.00 106599 JANITORIAL SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558652 VENDOR 321600 - ONONDAGA COUNTY SCU 10041869 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 218810 -00000 0.00 14.00 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 VCHR DISC COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 584.52 REPORT 100 -601 584.52 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 671.71 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.256.23 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 515.70 245.00 0.00 245.00 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER 139.65 DESCRIPTION 139.65 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558299 VENDOR 157710 - ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC. 2,430.00 10041719 366499689 -01 973.44 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 258.00 101612 CRAFT AND PARTY SUPPLIES 0.00 499.20 10041718 366449668.01 5,799.91 111 - 156390 - 652990 -00000 0.00 101386 CRAFT AND PARTY SUPPLIES CHECK NO 558748 VENDOR 341100 - OSPREY GULDSHORE BUILDING MATERIALS 10041808 25545 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES 10041808 25747 355. 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES 10041808 22820 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES 10041808 77876 355 - 156175 - 762200.80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES 10041808 25591 355 - 156175 - 762200.80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES 10041808 25564 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES 10041808 25445 355 - 156175. 762200 -80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES 10041808 25717 355 - 156175. 762200 -80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES 10041808 25791 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES 10041808 25628 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 106905 BUILDING SUPPLIES CHECK NO 558144 VENDOR 14820 - P. T. GATOR 10041604 T SHIRTS /SETUP 6132 59091 T SHIRTS /SETUP 16JI PAGE 156 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 584.52 0.00 584.52 671.71 0.00 671.71 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.256.23 515.70 0.00 515.70 245.00 0.00 245.00 190.72 0.00 190.72 139.65 0.00 139.65 499.20 0.00 499.20 49.00 0.00 49.00 2,430.00 0.00 2,430.00 973.44 0.00 973.44 258.00 0.00 258.00 499.20 0.00 499.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,799.91 472. 173422- 652990 -00000 0.00 283.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 283.00 0.00 283.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558437 VENDOR 224590 - PALM MEDICAL SUPPLY CORP. 10041070 D WARREN 9/7 001 - 155930. 652810 -00000 0.00 185.82 0.00 59054 D WARREN 9/7 10041070 N RAMIREZ 9/4 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 159.90 0.00 59054 N RAMIREZ 9/4 10041071 K CORBIN 9/10 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 21.56 0.00 059055 K CORBIN 9/10 10041070 C MAHER 9/7 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 47.96 0.00 59054 C MAHER 9/7 10041071 B ROGACKA 9/10 001. 155930- 652810 -00000 0.00 121.02 0.00 059055 B ROGACKA 9/10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558413 VENDOR 210500 - PAPA JOHNS 10041998 351010043 111- 156343 - 652210 -00000 0.00 72.09 0.00 56091 CORKSCREW SUMMER CAMP PIZZA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558691 VENDOR 330350 PAT'S PUMP AND BLOWER 10041740 301567 408 - 233351 - 646510.00000 0.00 3,171.75 0.00 104092 VACTOR PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558417 VENDOR 212260 PATRICK H. NEALE 10041183 20727 113 - 138912 - 631100.00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 100395 PROF SVC 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558544 VENDOR 278590 PAUL E. MATTAUSCH 10041184 9/9 -10 TRVL P MATTAUSCH 408- 210125 - 640300.00000 0.00 46.25 0.00 9/9 -10 TRVL P MATTAUSCH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558419 VENDOR 213470 - PBS AD SPECIALITIES, INC. 10041613 10561 472 - 173422 - 634999.00000 0.00 7.800.00 0.00 107662 PUZZLES /PENCILS 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558463 VENDOR 247350 - PEDERSEN PRINTING 10039132 1412 001. 121148- 647110 -00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 058723 PRINTING 10039935 1413 001 - 122310 - 651110.00000 0.00 64.00 0.00 058522 SUS CARDS 10041570 1424 490 - 144610 - 651110.00000 0.00 64.00 0.00 059084 PRINTING 10039134 1411 001 - 000000. 142900.00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 100799 PRINTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558804 VENDOR 900030 PETER HAYDEN 212601 9/6 TRVL P HAYDEN 001 - 172970 - 640300 -00000 0.00 8.50 0.00 9/6 TRVL P HAYDEN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558565 VENDOR 284370 PETER WILTSIE 10041574 8/24 -9/19 TRVL P WILTSIE 111 - 156310 - 640200 -00000 0.00 43.50 0.00 8/24 -9/19 TRVL P WILTSIE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558536 VENDOR 276020 - PETROLEUM TRADERS CORP. 10041616 276021 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 2,763.70 0.00 100062 FUEL 10041616 275123 521. 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 417.46 0.00 100062 FUEL 10041616 276122 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 274.16 0.00 100062 FUEL 10041616 276125 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 158.44 0.00 100062 FUEL 10041616 277105 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 579.26 0.00 100062 FUEL 10041616 276123 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 371.18 0.00 100062 FUEL SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 159 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO ' AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041616 276124 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 31.15 0.00 31.15 100062 FUEL 10041616 275129 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 407.68 0.00 407.68 100062 FUEL 10041616 274804 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 7,278.08 0.00 7,278.08 100062 FUEL 10041616 274497 521 - 122450.652410 -00000 0.00 2,445.75 0.00 2,445.75 100062 FUEL 10041616 275132 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 133.52 0.00 133.52 100062 FUEL 10041616 277104 521. 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 798.23 0.00 798.23 100062 FUEL 10041616 275136 521 - 122450 - 652410.00000 0.00 1,060.13 0.00 1,060.13 100062 FUEL 10041616 276019 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 7,296.66 0.00 7,296.66 100062 FUEL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24,015.40 CHECK NO 558429 VENDOR 217960 PHIL BURNHAM SUPPLY 10039575 354 408. 253212 - 646510 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 058458 REGROUND H S DRILLS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 558494 VENDOR 257160 - PHILIP T. REGALA. M.D. 10041181 B DRILICH 8/29 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 48.75 0.00 48.75 107641 B DRILICH 8/29 10042109 J AVILES 9/10 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 66.95 0.00 66.95 107771 J AVILES 9/10 10041181 J AVILES 8/22 001 - 155930.631210 -00000 0.00 48.75 0.00 48.75 107641 J AVILES 8/22 10042109 B DRILICH 9/4 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 3,933.80 0.00 3,933.80 107771 B DRILICH 9/4 10041181 J AVILES 8/31 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 149.50 0.00 149.50 107641 J AVILES 8/31 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042109 J BYRNS 9/12 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 48.75 0.00 107771 J BYRNS 9/12 10041181 J AVILES 8/23 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,318.20 0.00 107641 J AVILES 8/23 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558050 VENDOR 344070 PHILLIS ADAMS 10042018 R SOGNESS 9/01 #W3730 001 - 155930 - 634153.00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558606 VENDOR 303600 PHYSICIAN SUPPORT SERVICES 10041600 CCG 500 1 001 - 121810. 631230 -00000 0.00 2,678.00 0.00 101242 PRE EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558765 VENDOR 343270 PHYSICIAN'S DESK REFERENCE 10041989 PDR 2002 001. 443010 - 654110 -00000 0.00 69.95 0.00 107503 PDR 2002 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558523 VENDOR 271120 PHYSICIANS DAY SURGERY CENTER 10041180 R CADET 8/2 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 1,391.00 0.00 107594 R CADET 8/2 10041180 J CERVANTES 8/1 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 1.251.90 0.00 107594 J CERVANTES 8/1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558271 VENDOR 140310 - PHYSIO CONTROL 10040151 IV822902 492 - 144641. 652990 -00000 0.00 308.75 490. 144610 - 652990 -00000 0.00 21.98 0.00 58227 - TRAINING MACHINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558039 VENDOR 133180 - PINELLAS COUNTY SHERIFF 10041052 98 4518 001 - 013010 - 649040 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 AND SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558560 VENDOR 282390 - PITMAN - HARTENSTEIN & ASSOCIATES.INC 10042004 20881 336. 163650. 631400 -60101 0.00 4,167.50 0.00 104922 - 8/1/01 THRU 8/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558590 VENDOR 295900 - PITMAN - HARTENSTEIN ASSOCIATES 10041688 #11 313 - 163673 - 631400.69133 0.00 477.50 0.00 918060 - 6/1/01 THRU 7/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558661 VENDOR 324050 - PITNEY BOWES 10041292 5482808 SPO1 408 - 210151. 644650 -00000 0.00 10.392.00 0.00 102156 MAILING SYSTEM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558180 VENDOR 104390 - POM INCORPORATED 10040136 40716 001 - 156363 - 646970 -00000 0.00 2.400.00 0.00 101409 - PARTS /REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558680 VENDOR 327490 POWER & CONTROLS 10041067 601147 408 - 253221 - 649990 -00000 0.00 204.41 0.00 103185 REPAIR SVC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558553 VENDOR 281580 POWERSPORTS OF NAPLES INC 10040267 99071807 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 37.97 0.00 100113 - SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558487 VENDOR 255770 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST,LLC 10041465 PJ750225 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 25.80 0.00 101103 WELDING SUPPLIES 10040147 PJ 746856 111 - 156332. 646313 -00000 0.00 10.29 0.00 100611 - GASES CHECK NO 558352 VENDOR 174760 - PROCRAFT BATTERIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 162 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041927 PJ759721 408 - 233312 - 652990 -00000 0.00 71.95 0.00 71.95 101089 WELDING SUPPLIES 10039936 PJ 744368 490 - 144610 - 652710 -00000 0.00 30.09 490 - 144610- 641950.00000 0.00 2.26 0.00 32.35 100122 GASES /DELIVERY 10041927 PJ744365 408. 233312- 652990 -00000 0.00 156.98 0.00 156.98 101089 WELDING SUPPLIES 10039936 PJ 744941 490 - 144610 - 652710.00000 0.00 87.50 490 - 144610. 641950 -00000 0.00 4.50 0.00 92.00 100122 GASES /DELIVERY 10039936 PJ 745577 490 - 144610 - 652710 -00000 0.00 87.50 490 - 144610 - 641950 -00000 0.00 4.50 0.00 92.00 100122 GASES /DELIVERY 10041607 PJ 750226 490 - 144610 - 652710 -00000 0.00 209.59 0.00 209.59 100122 GASES /RENTAL 10041571 PJ744363 490 - 144610 - 652720 -00000 0.00 248.28 0.00 248.28 59808 GASES /OXYGEN HOSE 10041080 PJ 750227 408 - 253211 - 652990.00000 0.00 22.10 0.00 22.10 101544 WELDING SUPPLIES 10040152 PJ750223 109 - 182901. 644600 -00000 0.00 7.95 0.00 7.95 100159 - RENT WELDING TANK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 969.29 CHECK NO 558302 VENDOR 159000 PRECISION CLEANING INC. 10040137 1388 001 - 122220. 634999 -00000 0.00 342.12 0.00 342.12 101768 CLEANING 10040137 1402 001. 122220- 634999 -00000 0.00 171.06 0.00 171.06 101768 CLEANING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 513.18 CHECK NO 558403 VENDOR 201890 PREMIUM TRAVEL OF NAPLES, INC. 10041074 S MARESCA (99- 26.28) 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 345.00 0.00 345.00 99 -26 -28 S HARRISON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 345.00 CHECK NO 558352 VENDOR 174760 - PROCRAFT BATTERIES 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041081 152014 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 27.35 0.00 101133 BATTERIES 10041081 421341713 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 152.70 0.00 101133 BATTERIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558754 VENDOR 342190 - PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PUBLICATIONS 10041078 02114983 101 - 163609- 654110 -00000 0.00 299.00 0.00 058565 SUBSCRIPTION 12MTHS /23 ISSUES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558498 VENDOR 259910 - PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES 10039133 5156941 -000 301 - 120435 - 763100.80508 0.00 685.00 0.00 107118 PHONES BLGD W 10041083 S155410 000 001 - 122240 - 652910.00000 0.00 780.00 0.00 107548 DIG. SET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558647 VENDOR 320540 PROLIME CORPORATION 10041599 7245 408 - 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 3,900.00 0.00 100390 HAULING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558778 VENDOR 343620 PROQUEST 10041554 90453911 355. 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 6,137.25 0.00 107663 NY TIMES INDEX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558666 VENDOR 325880 PROSOURCE ONE 10041072 84992000 109 - 182602 - 652310 -00000 0.00 423.50 0.00 105870 2 -4 -D 10038294 06740400 109 - 182901 - 652310 -00000 0.00 581.64 0.00 105904 FERTILIZER 10041073 06828400 109 - 182602 - 652310.00000 0.00 101.00 0.00 102709 FERTILIZER 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558300 VENDOR 158120 PUBLIX 0410 10041931 I03663710/321600600 408 - 253211. 652310.00000 0.00 395.76 0.00 057453 FOOD /SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558512 VENDOR 263260 PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS #0076 10041926 I03752314/321600600 001 - 156130 - 649990 -00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 100651 FOOD /SUPPLIES 10041926 I03752254/321600600 001 - 156130- 649990 -00000 0.00 0.90 0.00 100651 FOOD /SUPPLIES 10041926 I03752336/321600600 001 - 156130 - 649990 -00000 0.00 5.20 0.00 100651 FOOD /SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558639 VENDOR 317040 PULSAFEEDER, INC 10041460 338396RI 408 - 253221. 652990 -00000 0.00 388.81 0.00 056995 AMP FUSES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558148 VENDOR 15350 PUMP AND IRRIGATION SUP 10041066 143838 322 - 183825- 646311.00000 0.00 508.20 0.00 107328 SPRINKLER SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558276 VENDOR 144550 - PYRAMID II JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 10041468 287549 408. 253211- 652510 -00000 0.00 53.52 0.00 101629 JANT SUPPLIES 10041459 286567 001- 156363 - 652510 -00000 0.00 936.97 0.00 100666 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 10041930 287179 111 - 156395. 652510 -00000 0.00 23.88 0.00 055324 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 10040460 286576 111. 156313- 652510 -00000 0.00 54.75 0.00 105536 JANT SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10040460 284634 105536 JANT SUPPLIES 10040153 287178 100666 - JANITORAL SUPPLIES 10041930 287493 055324 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 10041468 287976 101629 JANT SUPPLIES 10041930 286491 055324 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 10041930 286479 055324 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 10040460 284154 105536 JANT SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111 - 156313 - 652510 -00000 0.00 001 - 156363 - 652510.00000 0.00 111 - 156395. 652510 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211 - 652510 -00000 0.00 111 - 156395 - 652510.00000 0.00 111 - 156395 - 652510 -00000 0.00 111 - 156313 - 652510 -00000 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 324.00 0.00 83.52 0.00 225.10 0.00 30.00 0.00 38.00 0.00 191.80 0.00 219.23 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 165 VCHR NET 324.00 83.52 225.10 30.00 38.00 191.80 219.23 2,180.77 CHECK NO 558405 VENDOR 202510 - PYRAMID II, INC. 10041191 287391 001. 155410. 652510 -00000 0.00 33.87 0.00 33.87 103630 JANT SUPPLIES 10041566 286971 001 - 155410 - 652510 -00000 0.00 464.80 0.00 464.80 101416 JANT SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 498.67 CHECK NO 558529 VENDOR 272640 - QUALITY CONTROL BUILDERS, INC 10042102 #11 121 - 138755 - 762100 -33023 0.00 8,300.00 0.00 8,300.00 102856 - CEMENT 10042102 #11 (RETAINAGE) 121 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 830.00- 0.00 830.00- 102856 CEMENT (RETAINAGE) 10042002 #3 496 - 192340 - 763100 -33326 0.00 1,409.00 0.00 1,409.00 102644 THRU 8/20/01 10042102 #5 497 - 192340 - 763100 -33010 0.00 11.182.00 0.00 11,182.00 102686 THRU 8/20/01 10042101 #1 496 - 192340 - 763100.33383 0.00 4,268.50 0.00 4,268.50 107571 THRU 8/20101 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 166 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042003 #3 496 - 192340 - 763100 -33326 0.00 560.00 0.00 560.00 102642 - THRU 8/20/01 10042102 #5 (RETAINAGE) 497 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 729.00- 0.00 729.00- 102686 THRU 8/20/01 (RETAINAGE) 10042001 #5 497 - 192340 - 763100 -33010 0.00 1,564.00 0.00 1,564.00 102685 THRU 8/20/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25,724.50 CHECK NO 558674 VENDOR 326710 - QUALITY MAINTENANCE 10041079 1056 408 - 253212. 634999 -00000 0.00 720.00 0.00 720.00 103781 8/31/01 SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 720.00 CHECK NO 558407 VENDOR 202830 - QUICK KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES 10041192 10664 001 - 122240 - 639965.00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 100033 LOCKSMITH SVCS 10041929 10787 001 - 122240. 639965 -00000 0.00 99.25 0.00 99.25 059126 LOCKSET /LABOR 10041192 10664 001. 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 0.06- 0.00 0.06- 100033 2% DISCOUNT 10041192 10772 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 389.70 0.00 389.70 100033 LOCKSMITH SVCS 10041192 10760 001 - 122240. 639965 -00000 0.00 82.50 0.00 82.50 100033 LOCKSMITH SVCS 10041928 10786 001. 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 100033 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 10041192 10761 001- 122240 - 639965.00000 0.00 93.75 0.00 93.75 100033 LOCKSMITH SVCS 10040148 10765 111 - 156334 - 639965 -00000 0.00 215.26 0.00 215.26 100690 - LOCKSMITH SERVICES 10041928 10785 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 139.25 0.00 139.25 100033 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 10041192 10762 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 152.20 0.00 152.20 100033 LOCKSMITH SVCS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041192 10778 100033 LOCKSMITH SVCS 10041929 10783 059126 LOCKSET /LABOR 10041928 10776 100033 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 10041192 10777 100033 LOCKSMITH SVCS 10041192 10777 100033 2% DISCOUNT 10041928 10663 100033 LOCKSMITH SERVICES 10041192 10666 100033 LOCKSMITH SVCS 10041192 10666 100033 2% DISCOUNT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240- 639965 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 639965.00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001- 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 639965.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558622 VENDOR 310080 - RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ASSN 10041349 A,FAISON 08/30/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 MEDICAL SERVICES CHECK NO 558805 VENDOR 900030 - RANDY BASS 212660 5/24 TRVL R BASS 5/24 TRVL R BASS 212658 4/22 -28 TRVL R BASS 4/22.28 TRVL R BASS 212655 11/21. 9/30/01 TRVL R BASS 11/21. 9/30/01 TRVL R BASS 212656 7/31 TRVL R BASS 7/31 TRVL R BASS 212657 8/6 TRVL R BASS 8/6 TRVL R BASS 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 66.25 0.00 68.75 0.00 73.75 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.02- 0.00 127.50 0.00 15.00 0.00 0.30- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 156.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 167 VCHR NET 66.25 68.75 73.75 1.00 0.02- 127.50 15.00 0.30- 1,529.78 156.00 156.00 001 - 156130. 640300 -00000 0.00 23.11 0.00 23.11 001. 156130 - 640300 -00000 0.00 144.17 0.00 144.17 001 - 156130- 640200 -00000 0.00 685.28 0.00 685.28 001 - 156130 - 640300 -00000 0.00 16.15 0.00 16.15 001 - 156130 - 640300 -00000 0.00 12.18 0.00 12.18 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 212659 8/6 TRVL R BASS 001 - 156130 - 640300 -00000 0.00 62.55 0.00 8/6 TRVL R BASS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558842 VENDOR 900050 - RAY PATTERSON 212607 REFUND PARKS R,PATTERSON 670 - 000000 - 220010 -00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 R,PATTERSON REFUND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558713 VENDOR 334420 - RAY'S LAWN & GARDEN 10039647 10010 001 - 126334. 646314 -00000 0.00 877.50 0.00 105084 - MOWING SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558343 VENDOR 170630 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 10041906 75066 111 - 156313 - 652990.00000 0.00 493.50 0.00 58247 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558532 VENDOR 275110 REDDY ICE CORPORATION 10039649 00104837 109 - 182602 - 652990 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 100152 - ICE 10039650 105333 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 54.00 0.00 100921 - ICE 10039649 00104837 109 - 182901- 652990 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 100152 - ICE 10041432 00100707 109 - 182602. 652990.00000 0.00 63.00 109 - 182901. 652990 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 100152 ICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558396 VENDOR 198940 - REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOC. 10040132 REIMB FOR RECYCLED TIRES 472 - 173423 - 634999 -00000 0.00 11,013.00 0.00 107302 - REIMB FOR RECYCLED TIRES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558296 VENDOR 155680 - REED REFERENCE PUBLISHING 10041896 376078 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 663.79 0.00 059157 BOOKS 10041896 904013 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 331.90- 0.00 059157 CREDIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558293 VENDOR 152130 - RESPECT OF FLORIDA 10041897 33605 IN 109 - 182602 - 652990.00000 0.00 97.89 109 - 182901- 652990 -00000 0.00 97.89 0.00 57733 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558557 VENDOR 281860 - ROBBINS TELECOMMUNICATIONS 10039648 C4496.0801 001 - 122240 - 641150.00000 0.00 109.10 0.00 100008 - MESSAGE SERVICES 10040421 C4498 -0801 470 - 173410. 634999 -00000 0.00 33.02 0.00 106687 - MESSAGE SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558492 VENDOR 257090 ROBERT ASBEL JR. LANDSCAPING 10041356 152162 111 - 138911 - 634804.00000 0.00 55.00 0.00 2001061384 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558195 VENDOR 108430 ROBERT FLINN MOVING AND STORAGE 10041433 0108 00055 001. 443010 - 634999.00000 0.00 154.60 0.00 101503 STORAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558605 VENDOR 303240 ROBERT FLINN RECORDS MGMT CENTER 10041429 0108 00047 001 - 122240 - 639964 -00000 0.00 2.842.47 0.00 100024 STORAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558795 VENDOR 900020 ROBERT SCHMECBPERPER SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 170 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 212675 BOOK REFUND R SCHMECKPEPE 001 - 156110 - 347110 -00000 0.00 8.99 0.00 8.99 BODO REFUND R SCHMECKPEPER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8.99 CHECK NO 558471 VENDOR 248090 - ROBICON 10040445 HR285980 408 - 253221. 634999 -00000 0.00 1,886.44 0.00 1,886.44 106420 - REPAIR SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,886.44 CHECK NO 558559 VENDOR 282070 ROCHA CONTROLS 10041891 6071 408- 253212 - 634999.00000 0.00 495.00 0.00 495.00 57433 SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 495.00 CHECK NO 558274 VENDOR 142320 ROSANN SCHWARTZ, M.D., P.A. 10041439 J CHELLO 8/14 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 107642 J CHELLO 8/14 10041439 J YOUNG 9/10 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 438.75 0.00 438.75 107642 J YOUNG 9/10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 503.75 CHECK NO 558762 VENDOR 343090 - RUTH LEONARDI 10041419 RIEMBURSE R LEONARDI 408 - 233351 - 649990 -00000 0.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 58964 REIMBURSE PIPE BROKEN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 140.00 CHECK NO 558843 VENDOR 900050 RWA INC 212681 REF RWA 286890 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 20.12 0.00 20.12 REF RWA 286890 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.12 CHECK NO 558665 VENDOR 325750 RWA INC. 10042009 8750A 313 - 163673 - 631400.60027 0.00 123,663.00 0.00 123,663.00 102659 - THRU 8/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 123,663.00 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558149 VENDOR 16530 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 10041455 3781631 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 955.90 0.00 107120 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558314 VENDOR 161990 SAFECO 10041894 5697794 408- 233312 - 652990 -00000 0.00 293.30 0.00 103146 SAFETY EQUIPTMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558306 VENDOR 159900 - SAFECO INC. 10041886 5695452 408- 253211 - 652990.00000 0.00 15.80 0.00 103313 SAFETY EQUIPTMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558520 VENDOR 267020 - SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 10041434 301057 101. 163620 - 652140 -00000 0.00 384.70 0.00 106084 SAFETY SUPPLIES 10040440 300538 101 - 163620 - 652140.00000 0.00 9,010.40 0.00 106084 - SAFETY SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558368 VENDOR 184630 - SAM GALLOWAY FORD 10040423 515670 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 70.56 0.00 100082 SUPPLIES 10040423 516114 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 528.74 0.00 100082 SUPPLIES 10040422 CM513238 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 9.51- 0.00 100082 - SUPPLIES /CREDIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558304 VENDOR 159590 - SAM "S CLUB #6364 NAPLES 10041337 09/08/01 SAMS CLUB 518 - 121630 - 649990 -00000 0.00 117.01 0.00 REFRESHMENTS FOR RISK MAN. OPEN HOUS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558543 VENDOR 278410 SAMUEL ADDAMS, INC 10041357 188 111 - 138911 - 634804.00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 2001040952 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558770 VENDOR 343390 SANDI BRUNKER 10041345 08/29/01 RIBBON CUTTING 333 - 163650 - 652990 -60061 0.00 45.17 0.00 OPERATING SUPPLIES PURCHASED CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558354 VENDOR 174790 SATCO 10041909 230127 408 - 253221. 652310 -00000 0.00 1,090.96 0.00 100265 ACID 10041909 230206 408. 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,065.25 0.00 100265 ACID 10041909 230055 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,065.68 0.00 100265 ACID 10041909 230187 408- 253221. 652310 -00000 0.00 1,067.82 0.00 100265 ACID 10041909 230227 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,069.96 0.00 100265 ACID 10041909 230119 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,070.82 0.00 100265 ACID CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558150 VENDOR 16660 SCIENTIFIC SOUND SYSTEMS, INC 10041430 POP 71601 001 - 100130 - 634999 -00000 0.00 5,455.88 0.00 107165 PODIUM MONITOR 10041420 SDP90701 001. 100130- 634999 -00000 0.00 120.00 0.00 58895 REPAIR SPEAKERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558385 VENDOR 193330 - SCOTT PAINT CORP. 10041421 9050640 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 92.37 0.00 101978 PAINT SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 173 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041445 7784 408 - 253212. 652990 -00000 0.00 19.32- 0.00 19.32- 102353 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041421 9050662 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 21.42 0.00 21.42 101978 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041421 9050583 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 11.02 0.00 11.02 101978 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041421 9050887 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 69.94 0.00 69.94 101978 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041445 9050776 408- 253212 - 652990.00000 0.00 19.32 0.00 19.32 102353 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041424 9050739 408- 253211 - 652990 -00000 0.00 89.09 0.00 89.09 102492 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041445 9050574 408. 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 18.14 0.00 18.14 102353 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041446 9050484 111 - 156332 - 652999 -00000 0.00 21.92 0.00 21.92 102636 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041446 9045306 111 - 156332. 652999 -00000 0.00 30.30 0.00 30.30 102636 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041421 9050599 001. 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 162.03 0.00 162.03 101978 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041445 9050908 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 19.32 0.00 19.32 102353 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041445 9050649 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 73.46 0.00 73.46 102353 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041421 9050623 001. 122240- 652999 -00000 0.00 31.85 0.00 31.85 101978 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041444 9050719 408. 210130- 652990 -00000 0.00 858.00 0.00 858.00 102253 PAINT SUP 10041445 9050596 408- 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 31.14 0.00 31.14 102353 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041424 9050914 408 - 253211 - 652990.00000 0.00 1,550.00 0.00 1,550.00 102492 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041445 9050677 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 60.60 0.00 60.60 102353 PAINT SUPPLIES 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041421 9050193 001 - 122240 - 652999.00000 0.00 985.00 0.00 101978 PAINT SUPPLIES 10041446 9050685 111 - 156332. 652999 -00000 0.00 98.02 0.00 102636 PAINT SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558231 VENDOR 120930 - SEAL DISTRIBUTORS INC. 10041428 01 6468 408 - 233351 - 655100.00000 0.00 4,948.32 0.00 101925 REPAIR SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558609 VENDOR 305140 SECURITYLINK 10041435 50580666/22 681. 431310- 634999 -00000 0.00 499.51 0.00 100835 MONITORING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558844 VENDOR 900050 SEMMER ELECTRIC INC 212678 REF 283412 SEMMER 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 REF 283412 SEMMER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558230 VENDOR 120880 SEMSCO 10041908 3481592 413 - 263611 - 763100 -73945 0.00 2,200.00 0.00 102881 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558581 VENDOR 290100 SENIOR SOLUTIONS OF 10041436 APRIL MODEM CHARGES 123 - 155975. 641900 -33075 0.00 375.37 0.00 ARIL MODEM CHARGES 10041883 CCE COPAYS 8/28 -9/24 01 123 - 000000 - 208400 -00000 0.00 440.00 0.00 CCE COPAYS 8/28 -9/24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558578 VENDOR 288890 - SEVERN TRENT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 10038477 9/01 PEL BAY SVS 109 - 182601 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,320.00 109 - 182900- 634999 -00000 0.00 1.360.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 102683 9/01 PEL BAY SVS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 778 - 182700 - 634999 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558584 VENDOR 290970 - SHARON DOWNEY 10041660 PETTY CASH 116 - 121830 - 651110 -33297 0.00 116. 121830- 649992 -33297 0.00 PETTY CASH CHECK NO 558567 VENDOR 284700 - SHARON L. JOHNSTON, D.O. 20.01 10041437 S JOHNSTON 7/13 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 101.47 107595 S JOHNSTON 7/13 0.00 84.50 10041437 S JOHNSTON 8/3 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 0.00 107595 S JOHNSTON 139.75 0.00 10041348 K.PAYNE 08/30/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 100.75 08/30/01 K,PAYNE 100.75 100.75 10041437 S JOHNSTON 7/15 -17 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 799.50 107595 S JOHNSTON 7/15 -17 10041437 S JOHNSTON 7/10 -14 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 0.00 107595 S JOHNSTON 7/10 -14 20.39 0.00 10041437 L BOYD 7/9 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 107595 L BOYD 7/9 10041348 L,BOYD 08127101 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 08/27/01 L,BOYD CHECK NO 558769 VENDOR 343370 - SHEPHERD'S GARDEN SEEDS 10041360 E,MIAUITZ SEEDS 001 - 157110 - 652990 -00000 0.00 001. 157110- 641950 -00000 0.00 SEED ORDER FOR LEARNING GARDENS CHECK NO 558151 VENDOR 16910 - SHERWIN WILLIAMS 10041885 4044 0 001 - 122240. 652999 -00000 0.00 101979 PAINT SUPPLIES 16JI PAGE 175 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 1,320.00 0.00 4,000.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,000.00 81.46 20.01 0.00 101.47 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 101.47 84.50 0.00 84.50 100.75 0.00 100.75 42.25 0.00 42.25 139.75 0.00 139.75 230.75 0.00 230.75 100.75 0.00 100.75 100.75 0.00 100.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 799.50 43.85 12.95 0.00 56.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 56.80 20.39 0.00 20.39 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041885 4533 2 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 12.74 0.00 101979 PAINT SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558501 VENDOR 260670 SHIPP MATES 10041440 2249 408 - 210151 - 652110 -00000 0.00 602.00 0.00 106511 SHIRTS 10041884 2248 473 - 173411 - 652990 -00000 0.00 0.00 473 - 173411 - 652110 -00000 0.00 566.00 0.00 107478 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558502 VENDOR 260690 SIGNCRAFT 10041422 16689 346- 116360. 646316 -80081 0.00 1,102.50 0.00 106546 SIGNS 10040444 16691 111. 156332- 646316 -00000 0.00 840.00 0.00 106550 SIGN 10039658 16693 195. 156393- 646316 -80214 0.00 546.00 0.00 106546 SIGNS 10041893 17294 111 - 156332. 649010.00000 0.00 150.00 111 - 156334 - 649010.00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 106550 PERMITS 10040444 16690 111 - 156334 - 646316 -00000 0.00 840.00 0.00 106550 - SIGN 10041892 17293 195 - 156393. 763100 -80214 0.00 150.00 0.00 106546 PERMIT FEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558210 VENDOR 114210 SMALL ENGINE WORLD 10041441 8196 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 51.83 0.00 105950 EQUIPTMENT 10041441 8882 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 35.55 0.00 105950 EQUIPTMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558152 VENDOR 17120 - SMITH'S TRACTOR SERVICE SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041355 2001070967 2001070967 10041355 2001071029 2001071029 10041355 2001070956 200107956 10041355 2001070960 2001070960 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10041423 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 0.00 4,127.50 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 111 - 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 55.00 0.00 111 - 138911- 634804.00000 0.00 55.00 0.00 111 - 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 55.00 0.00 111. 138911- 634804 -00000 0.00 55.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558627 VENDOR 313450 - SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 10041513 11083 001 - 101520 - 652920 -00000 0.00 74.20 FRONTPAGE 2002 LICENSE CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 558446 VENDOR 231730 - SOURCE COMPUTING, INC. 10041423 2001045 408 - 210111. 634999 -00000 0.00 4,127.50 101352 UPGRADE 10041423 2001038 408 - 210151 - 634999 -00000 0.00 476.90 101352 UPGRADE 10041423 2001038 408. 210111 - 634999 -00000 0.00 715.00 101352 UPGRADE CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 558400 VENDOR 201320 - SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT 10041442 019490 490 - 144610 - 652720.00000 0.00 107061 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 558851 VENDOR 900140 - SOUTHERN BANK 212610 01- 8288 -MMA- ECT -AJK M,LAR 681- 431590- 635700 -00000 0.00 M,LARA 01- 8288 -MMA (ECT) (AJK) CHECK NO 558530 VENDOR 273150 - SOUTHERN COMPUTER SUPPLIES, INC. 178.00 CHECK TOTAL 28.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 177 VCHR NET 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 220.00 74.20 74.20 4,127.50 476.90 715.00 5,319.40 178.00 178.00 28.20 28.20 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 178 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10040133 0180107 001 - 010510 - 764900 -00000 0.00 6.546.21 0.00 6,546.21 106961 - PRINTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,546.21 CHECK NO 558845 VENDOR 900050 - SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT CO INC 212679 REF 284183 SOUTHERN DEV 113 - 000000 - 115420.00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 REF 284183 SOUTHERN DEV CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.00 CHECK NO 558612 VENDOR 305680 SOUTHWEST FL PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHT 10041860 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 218700.00000 0.00 2,036.83 0.00 2,036.83 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,036.83 CHECK NO 558337 VENDOR 168150 SOUTHWEST FLA SAFETY COUNCIL INC. 10041350 10989 408 - 233351 - 654360.00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400.00 CHECK NO 558763 VENDOR 343200 SOUTHWEST FLORIDA CHAPTER FERDERAL 10041605 REGIST R ABREU 001 - 010510 - 654360 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 59056 REGIST R ABREU 10041605 REGIST J HUBBARD - ROBINSON 001 - 010510- 654360 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 59056 REGIST J HUBBARD- ROBINSON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 558153 VENDOR 17410 - SPEEDY BLUEPRINTING 10041346 10193228 001 - 122240 - 651110 -00000 0.00 36.41 0.00 36.41 PAPER FOR LARGE ZEROX 10041352 10193813 320. 183800- 651210 -00000 0.00 103.46 0.00 103.46 BLUELINE PRINTS 10041454 10193695 101. 163630 - 652990 -00000 0.00 628.98 0.00 628.98 107234 PRINTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 768.85 CHECK NO 558571 VENDOR 285390 - SPORTS ILLUSTRATED SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 179 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041903 1092709664 8/21 111 - 156313 - 654110 -00000 0.00 81.95 0.00 81.95 55327 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 10041904 1092709672 8/21 111 - 156349 - 654110.00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 56078 MAGAZINE RENEWAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 101.45 CHECK NO 558486 VENDOR 255040 - SPRINT 10041525 593 3511 226 9/4 10/3 001 - 156110 - 641900 -00000 0.00 94.60 0.00 94.60 593 3511 226 9/4 10/3 10041525 695 2020 933 9/4 10/3 490 - 144610- 641900.00000 0.00 116.18 0.00 116.18 695 2020 933 9/4 10/3 10041910 263 0740 460 6/1 6/30 001 - 100110 - 641210 -00000 0.00 31.66 0.00 31.66 263 0740 460 6/1 6/30 10041525 657 1188 274 8/28 9127 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 26.18 0.00 26.18 657 1188 274 8/28 9/27 10041525 657 6566 069 8/28 9/27 470 - 173435 - 641900 -00000 0.00 109.61 0.00 109.61 657 6566 069 8/28 9/27 10041525 514 2377 377 9/4 10/3 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 31.70 0.00 31.70 514 2377 377 9/4 10/3 10041448 657 8336 098 8/28 9/27 681 - 431310 - 641900 -00000 0.00 204.38 0.00 204.38 101477 657 8336 098 8/28 9/27 10041431 092 4177 894 8/16 9/15 001 - 121143 - 641900 -00000 0.00 525.90 0.00 525.90 107354 092 4177 894 8/16 9/15 10041449 657 9003 434 8/28 9/27 495 - 192330 - 641900.00000 0.00 216.09 0.00 216.09 101983 657 9003 434 8/28 9/27 10041525 353 6816 050 8/25 9/24 408 - 253211 - 641100.00000 0.00 31.58 0.00 31.58 353 6816 050 8/25 9/24 10041525 435 4556 724 9/4 10/3 101 - 163630 - 641900.00000 0.00 31.58 0.00 31.58 435 4556 724 9/4 10/3 10041525 101 0486 976 9/1 9/30 001 - 156110 - 641400.00000 0.00 129.23 0.00 129.23 101 0486 976 9/1 9/30 10041525 101 1739 184 9/1 9/30 408 - 253221 - 641100.00000 0.00 164.10 0.00 164.10 101 1739 184 9/1 9/30 10041525 695 0008 900 9/4 10/3 198 - 157430 - 641900.00000 0.00 193.23 0.00 193.23 695 0008 900 9/4 10/3 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041525 498 4726 837 9/4 10/3 498 4726 837 9/4 10/3 10041525 354 1145 200 9/4 10/3 354 1145 200 9/4 10/3 10041525 263 0740 460 9/1 9/30 263 0740 460 9/1 9/30 10041525 657 2655 649 8/28 9/27 657 2655 649 8/28 9/27 10041525 513 9519 307 9/4 10/3 513 9519 307 9/4 10/3 10041525 642 0818 064 9/4 10/3 642 0818 064 9/4 10/3 10041447 775 5538 558 8/22 9/21 100787 775 5538 558 8/22 9/21 10041525 354 1144 112 9/4 10/3 354 1144 112 9/4 10/3 10041525 657 3391 060 8/28 9/27 657 3391 060 8/28 9/27 10041910 695 3473 779 9/4 10/3 695 3473 779 9/4 10/3 10041525 513 1235 601 9/4 10/3 513 1235 601 9/4 10/3 10041525 513 7928 493 9/4 10/3 513 7928 493 9/4 10/3 10041525 642 6652 151 9/4 10/3 642 6652 151 9/4 10/3 10041525 435 3255 255 9/4 10/3 435 3255 255 9/4 10/3 10041525 417 5243 947 8/28 9/27 417 5243 947 8/28 9/27 10041910 657 3391 060 5/28 6/27 657 3391 060 5/28 6/27 10041525 775 0534 663 8/22 9/21 775 0534 663 8/22 9/21 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 31.58 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 156363 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 100110 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163620 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900.00000 0.00 001. 156363- 641900.00000 0.00 681 - 421510 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101- 163630. 641900 -00000 0.00 113 - 138936. 641900 -00000 0.00 146 - 144380. 641900 -00000 0.00 188 - 140480- 641400 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 641400 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 113 - 138936 - 641900 -00000 0.00 113 - 138915 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 443010 - 641900.00000 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 34.49 0.00 31.58 0.00 31.70 0.00 207.67 0.00 31.58 0.00 55.22 0.00 34.35 0.00 31.58 0.00 187.46 0.00 68.65 0.00 25.74 0.00 31.58 0.00 23.53 0.00 33.43 0.00 37.85 0.00 196.69 583.23 0.00 35.68 0.00 PAGE 180 VCHR NET 34.49 31.58 31.70 207.67 31.58 55.22 34.35 31.58 187.46 68.65 25.74 31.58 23.53 33.43 37.85 779.92 35.68 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 181 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041525 513 9506 864 9/4 10/3 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 31.58 0.00 31.58 513 9506 864 9/4 10/33 10041525 101 1680 085 9/1 9/30 408 - 233352 - 641100 -00000 0.00 143.59 0.00 143.59 101 1680 085 9/1 9/30 10041525 101 1824 383 9/1 9/30 408 - 253212 - 641100.00000 0.00 143.59 0.00 143.59 101 1824 383 9/1 9/30 10041525 101 1724 306 9/1 9/30 408 - 253221. 641100 -00000 0.00 142.46 0.00 142.46 101 1724 306 9/1 9/30 10041525 695 2226 723 9/4 10/3 521 - 122410. 641400 -00000 0.00 23.53 0.00 23.53 695 2226 723 9/4 10/3 10041525 867 5435 137 8/28 9/27 521 - 122410 - 641400 -00000 0.00 102.46 0.00 102.46 867 5435 137 8/28 9/27 10041525 334 1040 979 9/4 10/3 001 - 443010 - 641900 -00000 0.00 541.06 0.00 541.06 334 1040 979 9/4 10/3 10041910 695 4450 232 9/4 1/03 146 - 144380 - 641900 -00000 0.00 40.65 0.00 40.65 695 4450 232 9/4 10/3 10041525 498 1789 018 9/1 10/3 490 - 144610 - 641900.00000 0.00 37.19 0.00 37.19 498 1789 018 9/1 10/3 10041525 657 3234 151 8/28 9/27 521 - 122450 - 641400.00000 0.00 19.98 0.00 19.98 657 3234 151 8/28 9/27 10041525 354 1142 838 9/4 10/3 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 31.58 0.00 31.58 354 1142 838 9/4 10/3 10041525 101 1612 761 9/1 9/30 001 - 156110. 641400 -00000 0.00 143.59 0.00 143.59 101 1612 761 9/1 9/30 10041525 657 1446 244 8/28 9/27 111 - 156349 - 641900 -00000 0.00 329.94 0.00 329.94 657 1446 244 8/28 9/27 10041525 263 8246 103 9/1 9/30 001. 156110 - 641900 -00000 0.00 87.80 0.00 87.80 263 8246 103 9/1 9/30 10041525 695 4331 144 9/4 10/3 470 - 173443- 641900.00000 0.00 41.31 0.00 41.31 695 4331 144 9/4 10/3 10041525 513 9264 452 9/4 10/3 001 - 156363 - 641900.00000 0.00 66.98 0.00 66.98 513 9264 452 9/4 10/3 10041431 093 2466 572 8/16 9/15 001 - 121143 - 641900.00000 0.00 241.03 0.00 241.03 093 2466 572 8/16 9/15 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041525 430 1583 085 9/1 9/30 430 1583 085 9/1 9/30 10041525 101 1549 760 9/1 9/30 101 1549 760 9/1 9/30 10041525 101 1611 759 9/1 9/30 101 1611 759 9/1 9/30 10041910 695 2902 083 9/4 10/3 695 2902 083 9/4 10/3 10041525 695 44425 196 9/4 10/3 695 4425 196 9/4 10/3 10041525 657 3002 010 8/28 9/27 657 3002 010 8/28 9/27 10041525 513 9546 668 9/4 10/3 5139546 668 9/4 10/3 10041525 101 1609 763 9/1 9/30 101 1609 763 9/1 9/30 10041525 101 1371 919 9/1 9/30 101 1371 919 9/1 9/30 10041907 179 9178 165 9/4 10/3 100787 179 9178 165 9/4 10/3 10041450 695 2778 742 9/4 10/3 101986 695 2778 742 9/4 10/3 10041525 498 5799 216 9/4 10/3 498 5799 216 9/4 10/3 10041525 513 9545 018 9/4 10/3 513 9545 018 9/4 10/3 10041525 101 2152 615 9/1 9/30 101 2152 615 9/1 9/30 10041525 354 1143 584 9/4 10/3 354 1143 584 9/4 10/3 10041525 592 6672 441 8/22 9/21 592 6672 441 8122 9/21 10041910 695 4114 945 9/4 10/3 695 4114 945 9/4 10/3 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VCHR DISC BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 408 - 253212 - 641100 -00000 0.00 001. 156110 - 641400 -00000 0.00 146 - 144380 - 641900.00000 0.00 188 - 140480- 641400 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410. 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410. 641200 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900.00000 0.00 001 - 156110 - 641400 -00000 0.00 408 - 233352 - 641100 -00000 0.00 681 - 421510 - 641900.00000 0.00 495 - 192350 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 156363 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630. 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101. 163630 - 641900.00000 0.00 146 - 144380 - 641900.00000 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 35.17 0.00 143.59 0.00 164.10 0.00 84.61 0.00 26.18 0.00 29.53 12.28 0.00 31.58 0.00 143.59 0.00 80.00 0.00 3.13 0.00 314.50 0.00 38.17 0.00 31.70 0.00 241.03 0.00 35.17 0.00 32.60 0.00 67.62 0.00 PAGE 182 VCHR NET 35.17 143.59 164.10 84.61 26.18 41.81 31.58 143.59 80.00 3.13 314.50 38.17 31.70 241.03 35.17 32.60 67.62 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041910 101 1087 919 9/1 9/30 101 1087 919 9/1 9/30 10041910 455 2275 227 6/10 7/9 455 2275 227 6/10 7/9 10041525 101 2218 703 9/1 9/30 101 2218 703 9/1 9/30 10041525 774 6251 228 8/19 9/18 774 6251 228 8/19 9/18 10041525 353 2874 099 8/25 9/24 353 2874 099 8/25 9/24 10041525 657 2525 608 8/28 9/27 657 2525 608 8/28 9/27 10041447 657 6608 321 8/28 9/27 100787 657 6608 321 8/28 9/27 10041525 430 1689 835 9/1 9/30 430 1689 835 9/1 9/30 10041525 593 0336 468 9/4 10/3 593 0336 468 9/4 10/3 10041525 101 1087 919 8/1 8/31 101 1087 919 8/1 8/31 10041525 513 9548 261 9/4 10/3 513 9548 261 9/4 10/3 10041525 774 5952 219 8/19 9/18 774 5952 219 8/19 9/18 10041525 513 7928 493 9/4 10/3 513 7929 493 9/1 10/3 10041525 657 5501 211 8/28 9/27 657 5501 211 8/28 9/27 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 75.62 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 121143 - 641400 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221 - 641100 -00000 0.00 130 - 157710 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 443010 - 641210 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211 - 641100 -00000 0.00 113- 138915 - 641900 -00000 0.00 681 - 421510 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 408 - 233313 - 641100 -00000 0.00 001 - 121143 - 641400 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630. 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 443010 - 641210 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 113 - 138915 - 641900.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558788 VENDOR 343880 - SPRINT ROTHHAMMER INTERNATIONAL,INC 10041905 108593 111 - 156313 - 652990.00000 58250 SUPPLIES 1� AMT NET VCHR DISC 497.54 0.00 75.62 0.00 124.10 0.00 35.38 0.00 27.98 0.00 262.21 0.00 80.57 0.00 35.17 0.00 123.51 0.00 497.54 0.00 31.58 0.00 30.74 0.00 31.58 0.00 81.95 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 288.90 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 PAGE 183 VCHR NET 497.54 75.62 124.10 35.38 27.98 262.21 80.57 35.17 123.51 497.54 31.58 30.74 31.58 81.95 9,206.37 288.90 288.90 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 184 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558229 VENDOR 120640 - ST. FRANCIS II ANIMAL CLINIC 10041443 R WOODS O1 8785 610- 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 106411 R WOODS O1 8785 10041443 J WATKEVICH O1 8570 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 106411 J WATKEVICH O1 8570 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 105.00 CHECK NO 558601 VENDOR 301540 STATE OF FLORIDA DISBURSMENT UNIT 10041857 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 218810 -00000 0.00 4,451.24 0.00 4,451.24 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,451.24 CHECK NO 558154 VENDOR 17510 STEPHEN Y. CARNELL 10041902 WINN DIXIE 001 - 121710 - 652210 -00000 0.00 11.25 0.00 11.25 59167 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 10041902 PIZZA HUT 001 - 121710 - 652210 -00000 0.00 67.45 0.00 67.45 59167 EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 78.70 CHECK NO 558846 VENDOR 900050 - STEVEN MICHAEL MEDINGER 212677 REF 284689 STEVEN M MEDIN 113- 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 REF 284689 STEVEN M MEDINGER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,000.00 CHECK NO 558316 VENDOR 163460 - STEVEN P. MARESCA 10041359 99.2628CFA -WLB S,HARRISON 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 282.75 0.00 282.75 S,HARRISON TRAVEL EXPENSES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 282.75 CHECK NO 558625 VENDOR 312170 - SUCCESSORIES 10041898 21148108 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 39.95 0.00 39.95 57794 SUPPLIES 10041898 21148383 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 9.90 0.00 9.90 57794 SUPPLIES 10041898 21147932 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 201.10 0.00 201.10 57794 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558159 VENDOR 17800 - SUMMIT HOME RESP. SVC, INC 0.00 10041438 G KOGER 9/4 001. 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 268.75 107644 G KOGER 9/4 268.75 0.00 10041438 A NAVA 9/5 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 0.00 107644 A NAVA 9/5 0.00 106.50 10041438 W JOHNSON 9/01 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 0.00 107644 W JOHNSON 9/01 0.00 195.13 10041438 G KOGER 9/4 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 0.00 107644 G KOGER 9/4 0.00 68.00 CHECK NO 558160 VENDOR 17820 SUMMIT MEDICAL SUPPLIES 0.00 10041427 154496 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 107645 SUPPLIES 10041427 154699 001 - 155930 - 652810.00000 0.00 107645 SUPPLIES 10041427 154766 001 - 155930 - 652810.00000 0.00 107645 SUPPLIES 10041427 154122 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 107645 SUPPLIES 10041427 154946 001 - 155930. 652810 -00000 0.00 107645 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 558266 VENDOR 136600 SUN BELT MEDICAL /EMERGI- SOURCE 10041899 87156 490 - 144610 - 652710 -00000 0.00 58177 DRUGS 10041425 087044 490 - 144610 - 652710.00000 0.00 106429 SUPPLIES 16JI PAGE 185 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.95 213.75 0.00 213.75 268.75 0.00 268.75 268.75 0.00 268.75 55.00 0.00 55.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 806.25 106.50 0.00 106.50 54.00 0.00 54.00 945.16 0.00 945.16 195.13 0.00 195.13 224.42 0.00 224.42 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.525.21 68.00 0.00 68.00 2,223.07 0.00 2,223.07 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,291.07 CHECK NO 558176 VENDOR 101420 - SUNCOAST SCHOOLS 10041847 PP #26 001 - 000000- 218300 -00000 0.00 123,552.28 PP #26 0.00 123,552.28 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558757 VENDOR 342720 - SUNCOAST SURGICAL SUPPLY INC. 10041890 86537 0.00 001 - 155410- 652710 -00000 0.00 59063 SUPPLIES 22.00 10041889 91664 109 - 182901 - 652990.00000 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 100170 59065 SUPPLIES 10041453 10041888 85868 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 101748 59064 SUPPLIES 10040431 10041888 91522 111 - 156332. 652910 -00000 001 - 155410 - 652710.00000 100591 59064 SUPPLIES 10040431 10041890 85840 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 100591 59063 SUPPLIES 10040429 10041888 86618 0.00 001 - 155410- 652710 -00000 - HARDWARE SUPPLIES 59064 SUPPLIES 379061 CHECK NO 558157 VENDOR 17660 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 10039657 379391 0.00 001. 122240- 652990 -00000 0.00 105639 - SUPPLIES 22.00 10039652 196980/4825 109 - 182901 - 652990.00000 79.20 100170 - HARDWARE SUPPLIES 0.00 10041453 379271 233.48 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 233.48 101748 SUPPLIES 0.00 10040431 379307 26.42 111 - 156332. 652910 -00000 26.42 100591 SUPPLIES 0.00 10040431 379611 14.21 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 14.21 100591 SUPPLIES 0.00 10040429 197263/4825 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100170 - HARDWARE SUPPLIES 34.11 10040435 379061 0.00 001- 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 105639 SUPPLIES 41.60 10040431 379529 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 100591 SUPPLIES 16JI PAGE 186 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 123,552.28 0.00 56.80 0.00 56.80 0.00 189.50 0.00 189.50 0.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 0.00 79.20 0.00 79.20 0.00 136.80 0.00 136.80 0.00 233.48 0.00 233.48 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 717.78 0.00 26.42 0.00 26.42 0.00 165.64 0.00 165.64 0.00 14.21 0.00 14.21 0.00 43.11 0.00 43.11 0.00 35.01 0.00 35.01 0.00 34.11 0.00 34.11 0.00 14.53 0.00 14.53 0.00 41.60 0.00 41.60 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 187 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041453 379396 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 7.53 0.00 7.53 101748 SUPPLIES 10040431 379305 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 7.18 0.00 7.18 100591 SUPPLIES 10040435 196461 001 - 122240 - 652987.00000 0.00 2.74 0.00 2.74 105639 SUPPLIES 10041453 379565 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 9.68 0.00 9.68 101748 SUPPLIES 10040431 379309 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 15.93 0.00 15.93 100591 SUPPLIES 10040431 379206 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 10.04 0.00 10.04 100591 SUPPLIES 10039657 196753 001 - 122240- 652990 -00000 0.00 2.68 0.00 2.68 105639 SUPPLIES 10041895 379236 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 18.16 0.00 18.16 100591 SUPPLIES 10040435 378347 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 28.60 0.00 28.60 105639 SUPPLIES 10040435 378681 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 42.30 0.00 42.30 105639 SUPPLIES 10040431 379615 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 35.07 0.00 35.07 100591 SUPPLIES 10041452 378990 101 - 163630 - 652310 -00000 0.00 26.03 0.00 26.03 100336 SUPPLIES 10039651 196716/4825 109 - 182901 - 652990.00000 0.00 33.12 0.00 33.12 100170 - HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10040431 379536 111 - 156332. 652910 -00000 0.00 39.51 0.00 39.51 100591 - SUPPLIES 10041895 378914 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 19.79 0.00 19.79 100591 SUPPLIES 10040435 195371 001. 122240- 652990 -00000 0.00 23.38 0.00 23.38 105639 SUPPLIES 10040431 379568 111- 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 23.33 0.00 23.33 100591 SUPPLIES SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558158 VENDOR 17670 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 10039655 443986 0.00 408 - 210130 - 652990 -00000 0.00 101401 SUPPLIES 450.29 10039655 443864 0.00 408 - 210130 - 652990.00000 0.00 101401 SUPPLIES 13.49 10041887 442680 0.00 408 - 233312 - 652910 -00000 0.00 100765 SUPPLIES 25.55 CHECK NO 558234 VENDOR 123170 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 10039654 379314 001 - 172930 - 652990 -00000 100298 - SUPPLIES CHECK NO 558399 VENDOR 200380 - SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 10039653 379557 0.00 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100231 - SUPPLIES /CREDITS 450.29 10041451 379435 0.00 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100231 SUPPLIES 13.49 10041451 379438 0.00 408- 253212 - 652990.00000 0.00 100231 SUPPLIES 25.55 10039653 379552 0.00 408- 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100231 - SUPPLIES /CREDITS 2.50 10041451 379437 0.00 408 - 253212. 652990 -00000 0.00 100231 SUPPLIES 2.32- 10039656 738238 0.00 408. 253211- 652990 -00000 0.00 101631 - SUPPLIES 106.22 10039641 378866 0.00 408 - 253212 - 652990.00000 0.00 100231 SUPPLIES 129.52- 10040433 379212 408- 253211 - 652990 -00000 101631 SUPPLIES 10039653 379554 408 - 253212. 652990 -00000 100231 SUPPLIES /CREDITS 16JI PAGE 188 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 719.70 0.00 18.85 0.00 18.85 0.00 54.62 0.00 54.62 0.00 450.29 0.00 450.29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 523.76 0.00 13.49 0.00 13.49 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13.49 0.00 25.55 0.00 25.55 0.00 6.75 0.00 6.75 0.00 2.50 0.00 2.50 0.00 143.91 0.00 143.91 0.00 2.32- 0.00 2.32- 0.00 3.02 0.00 3.02 0.00 106.22 0.00 106.22 0.00 9.89 0.00 9.89 0.00 129.52- 0.00 129.52- SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 189 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041451 379626 408. 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 20.98 0.00 20.98 100231 SUPPLIES 10041555 377806 191. 138785 - 884200 -00000 0.00 569.99 0.00 569.99 36118720000 S FRANCOIS 106682 10039653 379556 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 14.39- 0.00 14.39- 100231 - SUPPLIES /CREDITS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 742.58 CHECK NO 558847 VENDOR 900050 SUNSHINE ON THE GULF LLC 212680 REF 285381 SUNSHINE 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 REF 285381 SUNSHINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.00 CHECK NO 558493 VENDOR 257140 SUNSHINE STATE ONE OF FL.INC 10041882 0109030186 408 - 210130 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,683.68 0.00 1,683.68 100533 UTILITY DIGGING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,683.68 CHECK NO 558279 VENDOR 147220 - SUNSTATE METER & SUPPLY INC. 10041351 15078 408 - 253212 - 646510 -00000 0.00 185.06 0.00 185.06 NEPTUNE UME TRIDENT TURBINE METER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 185.06 CHECK NO 558539 VENDOR 277090 - SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS 10041837 34120BENNE 700J 001 - 157110. 654110 -00000 0.00 13.50 0.00 13.50 058960 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13.50 CHECK NO 558773 VENDOR 343490 - SURETY TITLE & JOSE AVILA 10041742 D/P J AVILA 39770920009 191 - 138785 - 884100.33751 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 2.500.00 39770920009 J AVILA 107640 D/P CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.500.00 CHECK NO 558774 VENDOR 343500 - SURETY TITLE & JOSE HERNANDEZ 10041743 D/P HERNANDEZ 38901240009 191 - 138785- 884100 -33751 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 38901240009 D/P J HERNANDEZ 107643 16JI SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558729 VENDOR 338360 - SURFACE AMERICA, INC. 10041901 1385 130.157710- 646315 -00000 0.00 486.75 0.00 56482 SURFACE REPAIR MATREIALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558631 VENDOR 315490 SURVIVALINK 10041000 42340 111 - 156313 - 652910.00000 0.00 450.36 0.00 58252 TRAINER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558796 VENDOR 900020 SUSAN BAVARO 212676 BOOK REFUND SUSAN BAVARO 001 - 156110 - 347110 -00000 0.00 4.99 0.00 BOOK REFUND SUSAN BAVARO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558357 VENDOR 179250 SW FLORIDA NEURODIAGNOSTICS INC. 10041347 A,GREENMAN 08/23/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 254.15 0.00 08/23/01 A,GREENMAN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558534 VENDOR 275930 SWEETWATER TECHNOLOGIES 10041426 10260 408- 253211. 652310 -00000 0.00 2,392.00 0.00 100256 ORTHOPOLY 10041426 10260 441. 256110 - 652310 -00000 0.00 314.16 0.00 057418 ORTHOPOLY 10041426 10037 408 - 253211 - 652310.00000 0.00 2,392.00 0.00 100256 ORTHOPOLY 10041456 10091 408- 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 9,702.88 0.00 100266 SUPPLIES 10041426 10387 408- 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2,392.00 0.00 100256 ORTHOPOLY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558165 VENDOR 18690 - T -SHIRT EXPRESS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041977 26285 107286 T -SHIRT 09/13/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 472 - 173426 - 634999 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558162 VENDOR 18020 - TAMIAMI FORD INC 10041029 86149 3,080.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100117 ARM & BRKT ASY, 8/29 0.00 10041029 86314 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 54.40 100117 LK SET, 9/4 8.89 10041029 86301 408.35 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 408.35 100117 TRANS ASY -ALRM, 9/4 36.19 10041029 86339 201.34 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100117 SENSOR ASY, 9/5 0.00 10041029 86303 0.00 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 36.19- 100117 PARTS, 9/4 8.54 10041029 86159 30.59 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 30.59 100117 CAM STRATON ASY, 8/29 1.223.34 10041029 86145 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 100117 BELT & RETRACT, 8/30 10041029 86241 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 100117 PARTS, 8/31 10041029 86231 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 100117 COIL ASY -IGN, 8/31 10041029 86199 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 100117 SPARK PLUG ASY, 8/30 10041046 CM86159 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 100117 CREDIT, 8/29 10041029 86203 521- 122410 - 646425 -00000 100117 RESISTOR ASY, 8/30 10041029 86179 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 100117 SENSOR ASY, 8/29 CHECK NO 558528 VENDOR 272270 - TAMPA BAY ENGINEERING. INC. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16JI PAGE 191 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 3.080.00 0.00 3,080.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,080.00 58.14 0.00 58.14 42.89 0.00 42.89 54.40 0.00 54.40 8.89 0.00 8.89 408.35 0.00 408.35 36.19 0.00 36.19 201.34 0.00 201.34 304.01 0.00 304.01 88.03 0.00 88.03 18.16 0.00 18.16 36.19- 0.00 36.19- 8.54 0.00 8.54 30.59 0.00 30.59 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.223.34 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041677 081763R TTJ 414 - 263611 - 631400 -73045 0.00 4,680.58 0.00 103888 THRU 7/31/01 10041677 081763R TTJ 412 - 273511 - 631400 -70045 0.00 4,680.58 0.00 103888 THRU 7/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558224 VENDOR 117110 - TAMPA BAY TRANE SERVICE 10041041 00300519 001 - 122240 - 652997.00000 0.00 219.00 0.00 100043 . REPAIRS ON 8/30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558653 VENDOR 321740 - TANYA R WILLIAMS 10041735 9/13 -19 TRVL T WILLIAMS 001. 156150 - 640200 -00000 0.00 44.08 0.00 9/13 -19 TRVL T WILLIAMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558163 VENDOR 18040 - TAYLOR RENTAL 10041035 1- 209105 -03 001 - 172930 - 644600 -00000 0.00 47.00 0.00 056278 - RENT CEMENT MIXER ON 8/31 10041917 113389 001 - 122240 - 644600 -00000 0.00 217.84 0.00 057881 SUPPLIES FOR RECEPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558460 VENDOR 240210 TAYLOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 10041913 31667 -01 111. 156313 - 652311 -00000 0.00 85.74 0.00 058244 CHLORINE TEST CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558398 VENDOR 199520 TECH OF COLLIER COUNTY 10041976 09/01/01 AUGUST 111 - 156332. 634999 -00000 0.00 1,339.00 0.00 103340 LANDSCAPING SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558724 VENDOR 337100 - TERI WIDES 10041076 8/15 TRVL T WIDES 001- 121810 - 640300.00000 0.00 40.78 0.00 8/15 TRVL T WIDES 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558370 VENDOR 184950 - TERRY SIDENER 10041914 9/21/01 SOCCER INST 111 - 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 260.00 0.00 059193 SOCCER INSTRUCTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558227 VENDOR 118970 - THE CONSERVANCY, INC. 10041553 DOCTORS PASS 8/01 001. 178985- 634999 -00000 0.00 1.551.00 0.00 102602 SEA TURTLE MONITOR 8/01 10041553 DOCTORS PASS 9/01 001 - 178985 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.551.00 0.00 102602 SEA TURTLE MONITOR 9/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558087 VENDOR 5440 - THE DUMONT COMPANY 10039043 079570 111 - 156349 - 652311 -00000 0.00 469.00 0.00 101245 HYPOCHOLRTIE SULOTION 10039044 079593 111 - 156313 - 652311 -00000 0.00 407.00 0.00 101243 HYPOCHORITE SOLUTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558593 VENDOR 298860 - THE EQUIPMENT BOOKIE 10039779 3550 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 172.06 0.00 105949 PARTS 10039781 3417 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 188.00- 0.00 105949 PARTS 10039543 3273 109 - 182602 - 646970.00000 0.00 639.45 0.00 107105 REPAIR 30 GALLON SPRYER 10039779 3379 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 320.09 0.00 105949 PARTS 10039780 2926 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 18.84- 0.00 105949 CREDIT 10039779 3485 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 144.40 0.00 105949 PARTS 10039779 3506 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 65.21 0.00 105949 PARTS SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 194 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10039779 3487 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 115.84 0.00 115.84 105949 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,250.21 CHECK NO 558722 VENDOR 336620 - THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY 10041556 #3 5/1- 8115/01 113 - 138312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 5,097.69 0.00 5,097.69 105924 INTERSHIP PROGRAM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,097.69 CHECK NO 558600 VENDOR 301350 THE NAPLES STUDIO 10041814 2974 490.144610- 634999 -00000 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 107574 TRAINING VIDEO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,500.00 CHECK NO 558146 VENDOR 14880 THE PHOTO LAB 10041189 75695 UTILITIES 408- 210130 - 647210 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 100535 FILM PROCESSING 10041932 76926 PUBLIC INFO 001.100130- 647210 -00000 0.00 11.65 0.00 11.65 59024 FILM PROCESSING 10041189 75387 UTILITIES 408 - 210130 - 647210 -00000 0.00 7.05 0.00 7.05 100535 FILM PROCESSING 10041932 76014 PUBLIC INFO 001 - 100130 - 647210.00000 0.00 21.45 0.00 21.45 59024 FILM PROCESSING 10041190 76920 DOMESTIC ANIMAL SVC 001 - 155410 - 647210 -00000 0.00 19.20 0.00 19.20 101192 FIM PROCESSING 10041069 75413 NATURAL RESOURCES 001 - 178985 - 647210 -00000 0.00 11.60 0.00 11.60 102650 FILM PROCESSING 10041733 76937 DOM ANIMAL SVC 001 - 155410 - 647210 -00000 0.00 6.40 0.00 6.40 101192 FILM PROCESSING 10041734 76751 WASTEWATER 408 - 210130 - 647210 -00000 0.00 16.10 0.00 16.10 100535 FILM PROCESSING 10041189 74467 UTILITIES 408 - 210130 - 647210 -00000 0.00 11.95 0.00 11.95 100535 FILM PROCESSING 10041734 76864 WASTEWATER 408 - 210130 - 647210 -00000 0.00 19.40 0.00 19.40 100535 FILM PROCESSING CHECK NO 558755 VENDOR 342410 - THE SALVATION ARMY 10040131 REIMB FOR MATERIALS 8/31 472 - 173423 - 634999 -00000 0.00 8,522.20 0.00 107306 - REIMB FOR MATERIALS 8/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558744 VENDOR 340580 - THE WORLD'S BEACH 10041911 22380 111 - 156341 - 646970 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 059195 ALUMINUM SEAT TUBES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558620 VENDOR 309470 - THOMAS M. MAGARDINO. MD 10041531 CERVANTES,J - 8/1/01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,625.00 0.00 107597 - CERVANTES, J - 8/1/01 PAGE 195 VCHR NET 45.20 18.70 4.90 21.15 34.00 20.40 107.45 381.60 654.16 654.16 8,522.20 8,522.20 65.00 65.00 1,625.00 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041573 73588 TRANSPORTATION 101 - 163610- 647210 -00000 0.00 45.20 0.00 59104 FILM PROCESSING 10041069 75901 NATURAL RESOURCES 001 - 178985- 647210.00000 0.00 18.70 0.00 102650 FILM PROCESSING 10041189 75139 UTILITIES 408. 210130. 647210 -00000 0.00 4.90 0.00 100535 FILM PROCESSING 10041077 76058 FACILITIES MGMT 001 - 122240 - 647210 -00000 0.00 21.15 0.00 058991 FILM PROCESSING 10041733 76958 DOM ANIMAL SVC 001. 155410 - 647210 -00000 0.00 34.00 0.00 101192 FILM PROCESSING 10041988 73730 TRANSPORTATION 126 - 138333 - 647210 -33204 0.00 15.30 126 - 138333 - 647210 -33725 0.00 5.10 0.00 059119 FILM PROCESSING 10041573 43623 TRANSPORTATION 101 - 163610 - 647210 -00000 0.00 107.45 0.00 59104 FILM PROCESSING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558147 VENDOR 15270 - THE PRINT SHOP 100648 45158 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 654.16 0.00 100648 PRINTING BROCHURES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558755 VENDOR 342410 - THE SALVATION ARMY 10040131 REIMB FOR MATERIALS 8/31 472 - 173423 - 634999 -00000 0.00 8,522.20 0.00 107306 - REIMB FOR MATERIALS 8/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558744 VENDOR 340580 - THE WORLD'S BEACH 10041911 22380 111 - 156341 - 646970 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 059195 ALUMINUM SEAT TUBES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558620 VENDOR 309470 - THOMAS M. MAGARDINO. MD 10041531 CERVANTES,J - 8/1/01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,625.00 0.00 107597 - CERVANTES, J - 8/1/01 PAGE 195 VCHR NET 45.20 18.70 4.90 21.15 34.00 20.40 107.45 381.60 654.16 654.16 8,522.20 8,522.20 65.00 65.00 1,625.00 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558848 VENDOR 900050 - THOMAS TOMERLIN 212612 REIMB INTERVIEW TOMERLIN 111 - 138313 - 640300 -00000 0.00 530.55 0.00 REIMB INTERVIEW T TOMERLIN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558527 VENDOR 271800 - TILDEN LOBNITZ & COOPER, INC. 10041676 139546 414 - 263611 - 631400 -73916 0.00 145.00 0.00 4539 - THRU 8/17/01 10041675 139535 414 - 263611. 631400 -74015 0.00 745.00 0.00 4475 - THRU 8/17/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558330 VENDOR 166380 - TRANE COMPANY 10041049 00300223 001. 122240 - 646286 -00000 0.00 2,183.75 0.00 101749 - FILTER SERVICE, 8/13 10041970 00299992 001 - 122240- 646286 -00000 0.00 4,512.50 0.00 101749 FILTER SERVICES 08/3 -13 10041049 00300110 CM 001 - 122240 - 646286 -00000 0.00 1,652.40- 0.00 101749 - CREDIT, INVOICED TWICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558849 VENDOR 900050 TREISER, LIEBERFARB,COLLINS & VERNON 212666 REF 286970 TREISER 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 REF 286970 TREISER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558164 VENDOR 18490 TRI- COUNTY BLUEPRINT & SUPPLY 10041044 5.020781 408 - 210105- 647110 -00000 0.00 0.96 0.00 100243 - BLUEPRINTS, 8/28 10041044 5.020795 408 - 210105 - 647110 -00000 0.00 3.84 0.00 100243 - BLUEPRINTS, 8/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559252 VENDOR 130300 - TRIPLE J SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042090 C12722 107619 CREDIT GRADING 10042090 12705 107619 HORATAM SOD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 322 - 183825- 763310 -00000 0.00 285.00- 0.00 322. 183825 - 763310.00000 0.00 11,485.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 197 VCHR NET 285.00- 11,485.00 11,200.00 CHECK NO 558363 VENDOR 182050 - TROPIC SUPPLY INC. 10042054 T10 -83422 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 105.44 0.00 105.44 107086 - HVAC PARTS, 8/15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 105.44 CHECK NO 558315 VENDOR 162300 . TROPICAL FENCE 10041838 1076 408 - 233352 - 646970 -00000 0.00 123.00 0.00 123.00 057932 REPAIRS 10041036 30214 408.253211.634999 -00000 0.00 438.00 0.00 438.00 057459 - REPLACE CANTILEVER WHEELS8/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 561.00 CHECK NO 558681 VENDOR 327510 - TROPICAL INTERIORS & ASSOCIATES,INC 10041043 16744 001 - 126334 - 646311 -00000 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 103196 . MAINT FOR SEPTEMBER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 250.00 CHECK NO 558478 VENDOR 253060 - TRUTWIN INDUSTRIES, INC. 10042059 26960 101 - 163630 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,910.00 0.00 1,910.00 100472 - TRAFFIC DEPT - PAINT, 8/29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,910.00 CHECK NO 558264 VENDOR 135240 - TUFF PUBLICATIONS, INC 10041030 8/28/01 ECHO AREA DIR. 198 - 157430 - 648160.00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 058785 ECHO AREA DIRECTORY AD 10041030 8/14/01 ECHO AREA DIR. 198 - 157430 - 648160 -00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 058785 ECHO AREA DIRECTORY AD 10041045 8/21/01 GAZETTE AD 001 - 100130 - 648160 -00000 0.00 199.50 0.00 199.50 107352 3 X 8 AD SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 198 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041030 8/7/01 ECHO AREA DIR. 198- 157430 - 648160 -00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 058785 ECHO AREA DIRECTORY AD 10041030 8/21/01 ECHO AREA DIR. 198 - 157430 - 648160 -00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 058785 ECHO AREA DIRECTORY AD 10041045 8/14/01 GAZETTE AD 001 - 100130 - 648160.00000 0.00 199.50 0.00 199.50 107352 3 X 8 AD 10041045 8/28/01 GAZETTE AD 001 - 100130 - 648160 -00000 0.00 199.50 0.00 199.50 107352 3 X 8 AD 10041045 8/7/01 GAZETTE AD 001 - 100130 - 648160 -00000 0.00 199.50 0.00 199.50 107352 3 X 8 AD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 810.00 CHECK NO 558457 VENDOR 237480 U.S. FILTER /DAVIS 10041529 7673525 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 739.78 0.00 739.78 104028 - TUBING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 739.78 CHECK NO 558456 VENDOR 237380 U.S. FILTER /DAVIS PROCESS DIVISION 10041702 36 703866 408 - 233352 - 652310 -00000 0.00 147.50 0.00 147.50 100891 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 147.50 CHECK NO 558671 VENDOR 326460 - UNIFIRST CORP. 10042051 23668 408 - 210130 - 652110 -00000 0.00 33.44 0.00 33.44 102880 - UNIFORMS, 8/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 33.44 CHECK NO 558735 VENDOR 339180 - UNITED LABORATORIES. INC. 10041034 36504 001 - 122240 - 652990.00000 0.00 416.24 0.00 416.24 057876 - UNITED 077 BIATRON, 8/21 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 416.24 CHECK NO 558167 VENDOR 18900 - UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 10041047 0000363797341/363797 001 - 000000. 142900 -00000 0.00 241.67 0.00 241.67 101177 - SHIPPING FOR 8/25 PAGE 199 VCHR NET 237.90 479.57 542.55 542.55 425.00 425.00 25.00 25.00 47.25 47.25 6.05 136.28 35.00 1,824.65 21.28 1 6 J 1 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041048 0000363797351/363797 001 - 000000. 142900 -00000 0.00 237.90 0.00 101177 - SHIPPING FOR 9/1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558177 VENDOR 102380 UNITED WAY 10041861 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 217100 -00000 0.00 542.55 0.00 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558313 VENDOR 161870 UNIVERSAL COMMUNICATIONS CO. 10041912 10842 111 - 156380 - 652910 -00000 0.00 425.00 0.00 056055 VIKING EMERGENCY PHONE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558166 VENDOR 18850 - UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 10041973 09/07/01 AGIC. DEPT. 001. 157110- 654110 -00000 0.00 21.00 001 - 157110 - 641950 -00000 0.00 4.00 0.00 GUIDE AND WORK BOOK SPASL20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558519 VENDOR 266510 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 10041836 058962 001 - 157110 - 652990 -00000 0.00 47.25 0.00 058962 NAME TAGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558580 VENDOR 289040 US HOME CORPORATION 10042118 REF 288662 US HOME 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 6.05 0.00 REF 288662 US HOME 10041846 REF US HOME 288412 113. 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 136.28 0.00 REF US HOME 288412 10042118 REF 288421 US HOME 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 REF 288421 US HOME 10041846 REF US HOME 287095 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 1,824.65 0.00 REF US HOME 287095 10041846 REF US HOME 287092 113 - 000000 - 115420.00000 0.00 21.28 0.00 REF US HOME 287092 PAGE 199 VCHR NET 237.90 479.57 542.55 542.55 425.00 425.00 25.00 25.00 47.25 47.25 6.05 136.28 35.00 1,824.65 21.28 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041846 REF US HOME 283637 REF US HOME 283637 10041846 REF US HOME 287098 REF US HOME 287098 10041846 REF US HOME 288403 REF US HOME 288403 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558378 VENDOR 190630 - VACCARO CONSULTING 15.99 10041974 08/10/01 CONSULTING 1,980.43 412 - 273511 - 763100 -70882 0.00 41.28 105377 SERVICES 41.28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10041974 07/23/01 CONSULTING 0.00 412 - 273511 - 763100.70882 0.00 0.00 105377 SERVICES 2,425.00 0.00 2,425.00 10041974 09/08/01 CONSULTING 7,980.29 412 - 273511. 763100 -70882 0.00 22.99 105377 SERVICES 0.00 22.99 22.99 CHECK NO 558458 VENDOR 237510 - VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL CHANGE 22.99 10042048 396812 91.96 521. 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 142.00 100063 OIL CHANGE, 8/1 142.00 9,392.00- 10042048 131811 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 100063 OIL CHANGE, 8/1 10042048 396821 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 100063 OIL CHANGE, 812 10042048 396792 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 100063 OIL CHANGE, 8/1 CHECK NO 558707 VENDOR 333670 - VAN ROEKEL & ASSOCIATES, DVM 10042049 85482 001- 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 058973 - VET VISIT, 8/3 CHECK NO 558219 VENDOR 115650 - VANDERBILT BAY CONSTRUCTION, INC. 10042012 #2 (RETAINAGE) 301 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 106702 - 7/27/01 THRU 8/27/01 RETNGE 16JI PAGE 200 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 15.99 0.00 15.99 1,980.43 0.00 1,980.43 41.28 0.00 41.28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,060.96 2.325.00 0.00 2,325.00 3,230.29 0.00 3,230.29 2,425.00 0.00 2,425.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,980.29 22.99 0.00 22.99 22.99 0.00 22.99 22.99 0.00 22.99 22.99 0.00 22.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 91.96 142.00 0.00 142.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 142.00 9,392.00- 0.00 9,392.00- SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042012 #2 301 - 110472 - 762200 -80535 0.00 93,920.00 0.00 106702 - 7/27/01 THRU 8/27/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558472 VENDOR 248570 - VARGAS LAWN MAINTENANCE 10041972 08/24/01 AUG MOWING 139 - 172531 - 634999 -00000 0.00 750.00 0.00 103479 MONTHLY MAINT FOR AUGUST CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558850 VENDOR 900050 VERA HOGAN 212665 REFUND PARKS V. HOGAN 111 - 156341 - 347270.00000 0.00 28.00 0.00 REFUND PARKS V. HOGAN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558630 VENDOR 314680 VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 10041527 A2106885BI 521. 122410- 641150 -00000 0.00 29.43 0.00 101129 - PAGERS FOR SEPTEMBER 10042046 A2003669BI 408- 233351. 641150 -00000 0.00 184.83 408- 233312. 641150 -00000 0.00 36.99 408 - 233352. 641150 -00000 0.00 34.00 408 - 233313. 641150 -00000 0.00 22.90 408- 233350 - 641150 -00000 0.00 9.54 408- 210130 - 641150.00000 0.00 173.70 408 - 210105 - 641150.00000 0.00 8.50 0.00 101031 - PAGERS FOR SEPTEMBER 10041528 A2120817BI 001 - 121143 - 641150 -00000 0.00 73.97 0.00 101171 - PAGER FOR SEPTEMBER 10042047 A2116210BI 113 - 138930. 641150 -00000 0.00 6.05 0.00 PAGERS F /SEPT /REF: PO 101295 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558488 VENDOR 256050 VETERANS INFORMATION SERVICE 10041193 WHAT EVERY VET SHOULD KNO 001- 155230 - 654110 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 059103 2 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558169 VENDOR 19260 VICS SHOE REPAIR CHECK NO 558714 VENDOR 334620 - VOPAK USA INC SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 202 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041526 906 - 03/9060101492 490. 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- OCCHIPINTI, 8/20 10041324 906. 08/9060101511 408 - 253212 - 652120 -00000 0.00 129.20 0.00 129.20 102791 - SHOES -PUGH, 8/22 10041526 906 - 03/9060101495 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- JENSEN, 8/20 10041325 906 - 05/9060101476 101 - 163610 - 652140 -00000 0.00 123.25 0.00 123.25 103199 - BOOTS -HALL, 8/18 10042050 13856 313 - 163611 - 652140.00000 0.00 102.00 0.00 102.00 056812 - BOOTS- RUSSETT, 7/26 10041324 906 - 08/9060101502 408. 253212 - 652120 -00000 0.00 129.20 0.00 129.20 102791 - SHOES- ESCOBAR, 8/22 10042052 906. 06/9060101475 408 - 210130. 652140 -00000 0.00 113.90 0.00 113.90 102462 - SHOES- VANDERMEULEN, 8/18 10041526 906 - 03/9060101496 490 - 144610. 652110 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- WILLIAMS, 8/20 10041526 906 - 03/9060101468 490 - 144610 - 652110.00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- LOVING. 8/18 10041526 906- 03/9060101494 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- MENDEZ, 8/20 10041324 906. 08/9060101512 408 - 253212- 652120 -00000 0.00 120.70 0.00 120.70 102791 - SHOES- HARRIS, 8/22 10041526 906 - 03/9060101493 490 - 144610. 652110 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- BEATTY, 8/20 10041526 906 - 03/9060101497 490- 144610 - 652110.00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- KOSHLAP, 8/20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.819.00 CHECK NO 558289 VENDOR 150650 - VISION CARE, INC. 10041855 PP #26 001 - 000000 - 217900 -00000 0.00 2.045.71 0.00 2.045.71 PP #26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,045.71 CHECK NO 558714 VENDOR 334620 - VOPAK USA INC SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10041328 TA- 609392 105138 - CHEMICALS, 8/30 10041327 TA- 609396 105139 - CHEMICALS, 8/30 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 625.00 0.00 408 - 253221. 652310 -00000 0.00 625.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558637 VENDOR 316950 - VORTEX AQUATIC STRUCTURES INT'L INC 10041916 343 111 - 156313 - 634999 -00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 057815 REPROGRAMMONG OF NEW COMPUTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558615 VENDOR 307620 - VULCAN PERFORMANCE CHEMICALS 10042089 310801 408 - 233312 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2,177.50 0.00 107629 CHEMICALS 8/31 10042089 310701 408 - 233312. 652310 -00000 0.00 2,177.50 0.00 107629 CHEMICALS 7/31 10042089 300601 408- 233312 - 652310.00000 0.00 5,972.50 0.00 107629 CHEMICALS 6/30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558371 VENDOR 185990 - VWR SCIENTIFIC 10042053 8476114 408 - 233350 - 652310 -00000 0.00 91.95 0.00 100563 - CHEMICALS, 8/29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558717 VENDOR 335990 - WALGREEN COMPANY 10042058 211609 001 - 155930 - 652710 -00000 0.00 1,213.51 0.00 107752 - PRESC.DRUGS FOR 8/15 -8/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558743 VENDOR 340230 - WASTE MANAGEMENT 10042099 N0801 -01 408. 233312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 11,870.37 0.00 106688 - DISPOSAL 10042098 50801 -01 408 - 233352 - 634999 -00000 0.00 17,740.36 0.00 106689 - DISPOSAL SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16JI AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558228 VENDOR 119030 - WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. 10041236 9/01 FRANCHISE FEE 473. 173411 - 313710 -00000 0.00 13,483.53 101038 9/01 FRANCHISE FEE 10041236 9/01 COLLECTIONS 473 - 173411 - 634800 -00000 0.00 464.769.41 101038 9/01 COLLECTIONS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 204 VCHR NET 29,610.73 13,483.53- 464,769.41 451,285.88 CHECK NO 558199 VENDOR 109110 WASTE MGMT OF COLLIER COUNTY 10042044 2275574/0141541 9/01 101 - 163620- 634999 -00000 0.00 178.18 0.00 178.18 2275574/0141541 9/01 100357 10042060 1507838/0139563 9/01 001 - 156145 - 643300 -00000 0.00 9.60 0.00 9.60 1507838/0139563 9/01 10042060 1496321/0142174 9/01 146 - 144380- 643300 -00000 0.00 9.60 0.00 9.60 1496321/0142174 9/01 10042060 1499835/0141486 9/01 001 - 061010 - 643300.00000 0.00 86.69 0.00 86.69 1499835/0141486 9/01 10042060 1492687/0141828 9/01 111 - 156332 - 643300 -00000 0.00 561.40 0.00 561.40 1492687/0141828 9/01 10042060 1586193/0141517 9/01 408 - 233351. 643300 -00000 0.00 122.06 0.00 122.06 1586193/0141517 9/01 10042060 8656808/0140353 9/01 001 - 061010 - 643300.00000 0.00 211.17 0.00 211.17 8656808/0140353 9/01 10042060 1490811/0139990 9/01 113 - 138900 - 643300 -00000 0.00 390.54 0.00 390.54 1490811/0139990 9/01 10042060 8656743/0136927 8/01 408 - 253212 - 643300 -00000 0.00 122.06 0.00 122.06 8656743/0136927 8/01 10042060 1514605/0141514 9/01 001 - 061010 - 643300.00000 0.00 175.59 0.00 175.59 1514605/0141514 9/01 10042060 1496518/0141481 9/01 001 - 061010 - 643300 -00000 0.00 86.69 0.00 86.69 1496518/0141481 9/01 10042060 2392724/0139598 9/01 001. 156180- 643300 -00000 0.00 86.69 0.00 86.69 2392724/0139598 9/01 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042060 1487683/0141816 9/01 1487683/0141816 9/01 10042060 8657431/0140453 9/01 8657431/0140453 9/01 10042060 1487276/0141456 9/01 1487276/0141456 9/01 10042060 8656593/0141561 9/01 8656593/0141561 9/01 10042060 1494949/0141832 9/01 1494949/0141832 9/01 10042060 8657481/0141606 9/01 8657481/0141606 9/01 10042060 1487705/0141817 9/01 1487705/0141817 9/01 10042060 8657645/0141614 9/01 8657645/0141614 9/01 10042060 2392759/0139599 9/01 2392759/0139599 9/01 10042060 1481553/0139509 9/01 1481553/0139509 9/01 10042060 1484455/0141441 9/01 1484455/0141441 9/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111 - 156332 - 643300 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410. 643300 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 643300.00000 0.00 001 - 061010 - 643300 -00000 0.00 001 - 156363 - 643300 -00000 0.00 001. 122240 - 643300 -00000 0.00 111 - 156332. 643300 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 643300 -00000 0.00 001- 156160 - 643300.00000 0.00 001. 156140 - 643300 -00000 0.00 001 - 061010 - 643300 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558391 VENDOR 196570 - WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 10042045 MEMB RENW'L- #1456142 408 - 210155 - 654210.00000 058807 - MEMBERSHIP F /ABBOTT,ALICIA CHECK NO 558418 VENDOR 212440 - WATER EQUIPMENT SERVICES. INC. 10042094 97.4453CA SETTLEMENT 408 - 210111. 631100 -00000 107691 - 97- 4453CA. SETTLEMENT CHECK NO 558379 VENDOR 191500 - WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 621.22 0.00 230.68 0.00 301.46 0.00 122.06 0.00 741.98 0.00 211.17 0.00 692.00 0.00 122.06 0.00 86.69 0.00 9.60 390.54 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 108.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,500.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 205 VCHR NET 621.22 230.68 301.46 122.06 741.98 211.17 692.00 122.06 86.69 9.60 390.54 5,569.73 108.00 108.00 6,500.00 6,500.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041915 055247 111 - 156313 - 652910 -00000 0.00 309.25 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 177.00 0.00 058258 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558292 VENDOR 151900 - WATER TREATMENT & CONTROL CO. 10041326 051943 408. 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 77.15 0.00 101290 COUPLING, 8/27 10041323 052054 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 7,246.22 0.00 104286 CARICA PUMP STATION REPAIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558373 VENDOR 187100 - WAVV -RADIO 10041038 8027 001. 100130- 648160 -00000 0.00 336.60 0.00 058698 - RADIO ADS, 8/11.26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558514 VENDOR 264010 - WEISS RATINGS INC 10041320 1502470 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 1,178.85 0.00 107238 - BOOKS, 8/29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558703 VENDOR 332390 - WENDY KLOPF 10041463 9/20 MBA LUNCH W KLOPF 191 - 138785 - 654360 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 9/20 MBA LUNCH W KLOPF CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558525 VENDOR 271140 - WEST COAST GRADING 10041040 2609 346- 116360 - 646314 -80081 0.00 135.00 0.00 058145 - GRADING F /SUDGEN PARK 8/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558170 VENDOR 19660 - WEST PUBLISHING CO 10041835 470278064 001 - 155230- 654110.00000 0.00 112.50 0.00 059102 VETERANS APPEALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558280 VENDOR 147370 - WILLIAM E GRUBBS JR, M.D. 10041322 ABRAHAM,D - 3/11- 12/2000 001. 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.00 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 207 REPORT 100 -601 10041322 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 197.60 0.00 197.60 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 4/1- 2/2000 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 10041322 CINTRON,C - 5/17- 18/2001 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 0.00 74.10 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558696 VENDOR 331220 - WEVU TV10 0.00 197.60 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 5/28- 2912000 10041330 3213 001 - 100130 - 634999 -00000 0.00 650.00 0.00 650.00 98.80 104305 - PRODUCTION CHRG F /AUGUST 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 12/27/99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 650.00 CHECK NO 558699 VENDOR 331470 - WGCU -TV 10041334 00501 -60 001. 100130 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,162.00 0.00 1,162.00 106737 - STUDIO TAPING 8/6 & 8/20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,162.00 CHECK NO 558172 VENDOR 19810 - WIEGOLD & SONS. INC. 10041039 128372 146 - 144380. 646110 -00000 0.00 116.00 0.00 116.00 058666 SERV AC IN FIRE STAT, 8/30 10041033 126444 146 - 144380. 646110 -00000 0.00 248.00 0.00 248.00 058808 MAINT OF AC UNITS, 8/30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 364.00 CHECK NO 558380 VENDOR 192170 - WILKISON & ASSOCIATES 10042014 17530 313 - 163673 - 634999 -66076 0.00 6,300.00 0.00 6,300.00 105280 7/30/01 THRU 8/26/01 10042103 17510 336 - 163650 - 631410 -60101 0.00 3,325.00 0.00 3,325.00 104921 7/30/01 THRU 8/26/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,625.00 CHECK NO 558280 VENDOR 147370 - WILLIAM E GRUBBS JR, M.D. 10041322 ABRAHAM,D - 3/11- 12/2000 001. 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.00 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 3/11 - 12/2000 10041322 ABRAHAM,D - 4/1- 2/2000 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 197.60 0.00 197.60 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 4/1- 2/2000 10041322 CINTRON,C - 5/17- 18/2001 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 74.10 0.00 74.10 107647 - CINTRON,C - 5/17- 18/2001 10041322 ABRAHAM,D - 5/28- 29/2000 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 197.60 0.00 197.60 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 5/28- 2912000 10041322 ABRAHAM,D - 12/27/99 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 98.80 0.00 98.80 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 12/27/99 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041322 ABRAHAM,D - 2/12- 13/2000 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.0( 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 2/12- 13/2000 10041322 ABRAHAM,D - 1/8- 9/2000 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.0( 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 1/8- 9/2000 10041322 ABRAHAM,D - 12/24- 26/1999 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 214.50 0.00 214.5( 107647 - ABRAHAM,D - 12/24- 26/1999 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,250.6( CHECK NO 558806 VENDOR 900040 - WILLIAM S. SMITH, JR. 212674 03902430900 WM SMITH 408 - 000000 - 115001 -00000 0.00 840.60 0.00 840.6C WM SMITH 100 KAULA LANE OVPYMT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 840.6C CHECK NO 558684 VENDOR 328770 - WILLIS OF WISCONSIN, INC. 10041971 0760196 517 - 121640. 631150 -00000 0.00 1.770.00 0.00 1,770.00 103579 CONSULTING FEES FOR AUGUST' CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,770.00 CHECK NO 558789 VENDOR 343900 WILSON RACQUET SPORTS USA 10041839 7098893 111 - 156390 - 652990 -00000 0.00 228.38 0.00 228.38 057210 CARNIVAL KIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 228.38 CHECK NO 558171 VENDOR 19690 WIN -CAR 10041329 027442/4114 146 - 144380 - 652990.00000 0.00 3.67 0.00 3.67 101917 - TAPE & POSTERBOARD, 8/31 10041329 027419/4114 146 - 144380- 652990 -00000 0.00 2.69 0.00 2.69 101917 - SUPPLIES, 8/31 10041329 026401/4114 146 - 144380- 652990 -00000 0.00 4.40 0.00 4.40 101917 - INSECT SPRAY, 8/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.76 CHECK NO 558632 VENDOR 315760 - WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE PHYSICIANS 10041840 D. VIGNEAULT 8/15 -8/17 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 4,259.45 0.00 4,259.45 107688 D. VIGNEAULT 8/15 -8/17 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041840 D. VIGNEAULT 8/17/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 1,017.25 0.00 107688 D. VIGNEAULT 8/17/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558273 VENDOR 141840 - WOODSIDE LANES 10041975 07/23/01 111 - 156381- 634999 -00000 0.00 535.00 0.00 105664 BOWLING 10041975 07/26/01 130 - 157710 - 634999 -00000 0.00 840.00 0.00 105664 BOWLING 10041975 07/23/01 130 - 157710- 634999 -00000 0.00 425.00 0.00 105664 BOWLING 10041975 07/27/01 111. 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 730.00 0.00 105664 BOWLING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558564 VENDOR 283990 - WSGL FM- MIX 103 10041032 4731 001 - 100130. 648160 -00000 0.00 255.00 0.00 058898 - RADIO ADS FOR 8/8 -28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558655 VENDOR 322200 - XEROX ADVANCED BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 10041031 424 113 - 138910 - 651110 -00000 0.00 231.00 0.00 058593 - TONER CARTRIDGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558173 VENDOR 19970 - XEROX CORPORATION 10041978 083959207 111 - 138313. 651210.00000 0.00 117.00 0.00 101060 BASE CHARGE 07/24 TO 08121 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558435 VENDOR 223690 - XEROX CORPORATION 10041332 083959177 109 - 182601- 644600.00000 0.00 81.40 109 - 182900- 644600 -00000 0.00 81.40 778 - 182700 - 644600 -00000 0.00 81.41 0.00 100169 - 8 /01 RENTAL 10041333 590526723 001 - 172910 - 644600 -00000 0.00 138.90 0.00 100318 - LEASE PYMT 35 OF 36 SEPTEMBER 26, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 210 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 383.11 CHECK NO 558473 VENDOR 249650 - XEROX CORPORATION 10041335 083959117 113 - 138900 - 644620 -00000 0.00 1,524.80 0.00 1,524.80 105181 -LEASE BASE CHRG & EXTRAS -AUG 10041335 590617826 113 - 138900 - 644620 -00000 0.00 232.48 0.00 232.48 105181 - LEASE PYMT 4 OF 60- FIERY #12 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,757.28 CHECK NO 558174 VENDOR 20050 - ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 10041037 89160859 198 - 157410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 33.60 0.00 33.60 058750 - FIRST AID SUPPLIES, 8/31 10041331 89160844 408. 233351- 652720 -00000 0.00 43.85 0.00 43.85 104981 - MEDICAL SUPPLIES, 8/30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 77.45 CHECK NO 558319 VENDOR 164080 - ZEP MANUFACTURING CO. 10041530 64237951 408 - 233312. 652410 -00000 0.00 256.50 0.00 256.50 101670 - MAINT SUPPLIES, 8/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 256.50 752 CHECKS WRITTEN GRAND TOTAL 0.00 4,787,295.27 16J1 � Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County, Florida Finance & Accounting Department MEMORANDUM Date: 10/02/01 To: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners From: Constance C. Murray, General Operations Manager Finance Department /Clerk to the Board Re: Board of County Commissioners Disbursements Please find attached a listing of the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period September 26, 2001 through October 2, 2001. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1) I request that these reports be included as miscellaneous correspondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made part of the official records. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please telephone me at 774- 8481. Disc. Corres: Date: ' item# ) (f_\ \ i Copies To: OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 559419 VENDOR 343800 - PHILIPS MEDICAL SERVICE HSG 10041996 5558541 492 - 144641. 654360.00000 0.00 59166 AED TRAINER 16JI PAGE 1 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 343.40 0.00 343.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 343.40 CHECK NO 559416 VENDOR 343710 - A/C ELECTRIC SERVICE OF SW FL, INC. 10042674 2441 191 - 138785 - 884200 -33751 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 357590000009 L SMITH 059130 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 559210 VENDOR 267110 - AAA EXPRESS BAIL BONDS 10043290 L.DIAZ 00 -2862 08/14/01 001 - 431510. 351100 -00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 08/14/01 L,DIAZ 00- 2862CFS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,000.00 CHECK NO 559045 VENDOR 161100 - AAA GENERATOR & PUMP INC. 10041027 G01 -0940 408 - 253221 - 634999.00000 0.00 1,154.20 0.00 1,154.20 100400 REPAIR TO GENERATORS 10043304 G01 -0989 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 835.47 0.00 835.47 100400 GENERATOR SERVICE AND REPAIR 10043304 GO1 -0992 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 3,008.88 0.00 3,008.88 100400 GENERATOR SERVICE AND REPAIR 10041027 G01 -0937 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,038.20 0.00 1,038.20 100400 REPAIR TO GENERATORS 10041106 G01 -0930 188 - 140480 - 646970 -00000 0.00 172.44 0.00 172.44 100413 MAINT OF GERNERATORS 10043304 G01 -0988 408 - 253221 - 634999.00000 0.00 469.50 0.00 469.50 100400 GENERATOR SERVICE AND REPAIR 10043304 G01 -0986 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 523.50 0.00 523.50 100400 GENERATOR SERVICE AND REPAIR 10041027 G01 -0941 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,074.20 0.00 1,074.20 100400 REPAIR TO GENERATORS 10043304 G01 -0990 408. 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,187.74 0.00 1.187.74 100400 GENERATOR SERVICE AND REPAIR CHECK NO 559104 VENDOR 201440 - AAA MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY COMPANY 10042898 9241P -40 408 - 253211- 652990 -00000 0.00 184.35 0.00 184.35 KORALEX II FLAG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 184.35 CHECK NO 559480 VENDOR 900080 - AARP HEALTHCARE OPTIONS 212770 AMB REF JOY 03/16/01 490- 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 6.17 0.00 6.17 AMB REF JOY 0116584 -1 03/16/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6.17 CHECK NO 559266 VENDOR 297120 - ABA ENTERTAINMENT CONSULTANTS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 PAGE 2 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ENTERTAINMENT FOR ICE CREAM SOCIAL SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 559138 VENDOR 237370 - ABB WATER METERS INC. VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042498 GO1 -0936 001 - 122240. 634999 -00000 0.00 750.07 0.00 750.07 104185 - GEN REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 10043273 175457 408. 253212- 655100.00000 0.00 10043304 GO1 -0987 408 - 253221 - 634999.00000 0.00 379.50 0.00 379.50 100400 - GENERATOR SERVICE 10043273 173344 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 10042498 G01 -0952 001 - 122240 - 634999.00000 0.00 908.00 0.00 908.00 104185 - GEN REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 10043273 172442 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 10043277 GO1 -0901 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 376.09 0.00 376.09 GENERATOR REPAIR 10043273 173406 408. 253212- 655100 -00000 0.00 209.57 0.00 209.57 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11,877.79 CHECK NO 559104 VENDOR 201440 - AAA MANUFACTURING & SUPPLY COMPANY 10042898 9241P -40 408 - 253211- 652990 -00000 0.00 184.35 0.00 184.35 KORALEX II FLAG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 184.35 CHECK NO 559480 VENDOR 900080 - AARP HEALTHCARE OPTIONS 212770 AMB REF JOY 03/16/01 490- 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 6.17 0.00 6.17 AMB REF JOY 0116584 -1 03/16/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6.17 CHECK NO 559266 VENDOR 297120 - ABA ENTERTAINMENT CONSULTANTS 10042347 07/31/01 ICE CREAM SOCIAL 111 - 156341 - 634999 -00000 0.00 495.00 0.00 495.00 ENTERTAINMENT FOR ICE CREAM SOCIAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 495.00 CHECK NO 559138 VENDOR 237370 - ABB WATER METERS INC. 10043273 175355 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 209.57- 0.00 209.57- 102912 RADIO READ METERS 10043273 175457 408. 253212- 655100.00000 0.00 2,932.32- 0.00 2,932.32- 102912 RADIO READ METERS 10043273 173344 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 32.59 0.00 32.59 102912 RADIO READ METERS 10043273 172442 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 3,598.75 0.00 3,598.75 102912 RADIO READ METERS 10043273 173406 408. 253212- 655100 -00000 0.00 209.57 0.00 209.57 102912 RADIO READ METERS OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10043273 169458 102912 RADIO READ METERS 10043273 175929 102912 RADIO READ METERS 10043273 175352 102912 RADIO READ METERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 286.00 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 0.00 FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 0.00 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 408- 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 4,413.60 0.00 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 143.95- 0.00 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 32.59- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559026 VENDOR 147860 - ABE SKINNER, PROPERTY APPRAISER 10042311 2001 -28 113 - 138323 - 651110 -00000 0.00 BLUE LINE MAP IMMOKALEE HOUSING CHECK NO 559252 VENDOR 288960 - ABLE BODY TEMPORARY SERVICE 10041099 115005365 109 - 182602 - 634999 -00000 0.00 109 - 182901 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100151 TEMPERARY LABOR 10041028 115005435 109 - 182602 - 634999 -00000 0.00 109 - 182901 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100151 TEMPERARY LABOR CHECK NO 559332 VENDOR 325040 - ACE TOOL COMPANY 10043288 2942270 -00 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 HEAVY DUTY IMPACT SHOP SUPPLY CHECK NO 559132 VENDOR 231690 - ACOUSTI ENGINEERING COMPANY OF FL 10042342 001544 001 - 122240 - 652989 -00000 0.00 708 USG CEILING TILES 10042340 001545 001 - 122240 - 652989 -00000 0.00 769 ARM 96 CEILING TILE 10042341 001546 001 - 122240 - 652989.00000 0.00 418 USG CEILING TILE 286.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,290.84 3,160.32 1,416.07 3,466.93 CHECK TOTAL 270.59 CHECK TOTAL PAGE 3 VCHR NET 4,413.60 143.95 - 32.59- 4,936.08 0.00 286.00 0.00 286.00 0.00 4,451.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,883.00 9,334.16 270.59 270.59 464.60 0.00 464.60 446.18 0.00 446.18 235.32 0.00 235.32 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,146.10 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559355 VENDOR 332690 - ADAMS MARK HOTEL 10038085 JUDGE E. TURNER 10110 -12 001 - 432020 - 640300 -00000 0.00 198.00 0.00 58318 - JUDGE E. TURNER 10110 -12 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559162 VENDOR 248270 - ADAMS TANK & LIFT 10042196 79919 521 - 122450 - 646510 -00000 0.00 319.88 0.00 100087 INSPECTION AND REPAIR 10042897 79923 521 - 122450 - 646510.00000 0.00 397.24 0.00 SUBLET WORK AT CARNESTOWN REPAIR PU CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559311 VENDOR 317580 ADECCO 10043316 57958685 470. 173410- 634999 -00000 0.00 442.37 0.00 106678 TEMPERARY HEP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559446 VENDOR 344490 ADRIENN BONNYAI 10042805 7/17,9/25 TRVL A BONNYAI 001 - 156110. 640300 -00000 0.00 39.84 0.00 7/17,9/25 TRVL A BONNYAI CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559417 VENDOR 343770 - ADVANCED BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC 10042194 4384 111 - 156332 - 652910.00000 0.00 594.85 0.00 107723 DIGITAL CAMERA 10042194 4385 111- 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 594.85 0.00 107723 DIGITAL CAMERA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559213 VENDOR 268650 - ADVANCED FIRE SYSTEMS INC 10042316 49338 408 - 233312. 649990 -00000 0.00 276.40 0.00 TROUBLE SHOOT AND REPAIR FIRE ALARM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559223 VENDOR 276040 - ADVANCED FIRE SYSTEMS. INC OCTOBER 02. 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 5 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041102 48967 001- 122240 - 634007.00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 100003 MAINT OF EXTINGUISHERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.00 CHECK NO 558976 VENDOR 113770 - ADVANCED MEDICAL CENTER 10043271 47330 001. 121810 - 631230 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 101248 FEE FOR PRE EMPLOYMENT 10043271 39991 001 - 121810 - 631230 -00000 0.00 885.00 0.00 885.00 101248 FEE FOR PRE EMPLOYMENT 10043271 30154 001 - 121810. 631230 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 101248 FEE FOR PRE EMPLOYMENT 10043271 44160 001- 121810 - 631230 -00000 0.00 170.00 0.00 170.00 101248 FEE FOR PRE EMPLOYMENT 10043271 33739 001 - 121810 - 631230.00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 101248 FEE FOR PRE EMPLOYMENT 10043271 35286 001 - 121810 - 631230 -00000 0.00 115.00 0.00 115.00 101248 FEE FOR PRE EMPLOYMENT 10043271 32932 001 - 121810 - 631230 -00000 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 101248 FEE FOR PRE EMPLOYMENT 10043271 45315 001 - 121810 - 631230 -00000 0.00 195.00 0.00 195.00 101248 FEE FOR PRE EMPLOYMENT 10043271 42114 001 - 121810 - 631230 -00000 0.00 205.00 0.00 205.00 101248 FEE FOR PRE EMPLOYMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,805.00 CHECK NO 559186 VENDOR 256950 - ADVANCED OVERHEAD SYSTEMS 10043278 6672 408 - 253212 - 634999.00000 0.00 600.00 0.00 600.00 106750 INSPECTION OF CRANES 10043278 6671 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 198.40 0.00 198.40 106750 INSPECTION OF CRANES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 798.40 CHECK NO 559319 VENDOR 320830 - AEC NATIONAL /WILKISON JOINT VENTURE 10043155 090704 412 - 273511 - 631400 -70074 0.00 9.795.00 0.00 9.795.00 7239 - THRU 8/31/01 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042998 090712 412- 273511 - 631400.70077 0.00 2,539.00 0.00 106976 THRU 8/31/01 10043003 17513 306. 156311 - 631400 -80071 0.00 850.00 0.00 105618 THRU 8/31/01 10043155 090704 414 - 263611 - 631400 -73060 0.00 790.00 0.00 7239 - THRU 8/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559481 VENDOR 900080 - AETNA US HEALTHCARE INS 212771 AMB REF MATTHES 06/15/01 490. 000000- 116004.00000 0.00 2.65 0.00 AMB REF MATTHES 0125252 -1 06/15/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558862 VENDOR 300 - AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. 10043004 010575 109 - 182602. 631400 -00000 0.00 507.50 0.00 106078 SERVICES THRU 9/11/01 10043005 010576 320 - 183800 - 631400 -00000 0.00 0.00 320 - 183800 - 631400.10268 0.00 9,106.25 0.00 106080 SERVICES THRU 9/11/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559236 VENDOR 281770 - ALAN AND PATRICIA BOOLE 10042505 9/01 001 - 061010 - 644100 -00000 0.00 1,960.00 0.00 100544 9/01 10042505 8/01 BALANCE 001 - 061010 - 644100 -00000 0.00 1,960.00 0.00 106652 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559284 VENDOR 306130 ALBERTA DRURY R.N. 10042474 P.EVANS 01 -1093 681 - 421190 - 631990 -00000 0.00 175.00 0.00 P.EVANS 01 -1093 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559294 VENDOR 311580 ALERT RESPIRATORY SERVICES, INC. 10042346 1810 G,COOK 09/11 -18/01 123 - 155975 - 634104 -33075 0.00 115.46 0.00 WALKER FOR CLIENT G,COOK OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559181 VENDOR 256320 - ALFAX 10042932 V60046 -UNI 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 249.90 0.00 055332 WASTE RECEPTACLE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559482 VENDOR 900080 - ALICE M. WARE 212775 AMB REF WARE 05/18/01 490 - 000000 - 116004.00000 0.00 320.00 0.00 AMB REF WARE 0122852 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559084 VENDOR 184390 - ALL STATE BIOGUARD SERVICES, INC. 10042895 35824 111 - 156349 - 634999 -00000 0.00 26.00 0.00 104421 BIOHAZARD PICK UP 10040342 35371 111 - 156313 - 634999 -00000 0.00 26.00 0.00 104419 BIOHAllARD WASTE PICKUP 10040342 35372 111 - 156313 - 634999 -00000 0.00 17.00 0.00 104419 BIOHAllARD WASTE PICKUP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558973 VENDOR 109450 - ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORPORATION 10041016 211707 408. 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2,544.91 0.00 100262 SODIUM HYDROXIDE 10041016 211844 408. 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2,448.46 0.00 100262 SODIUM HYDROXIDE 10042192 212569 408 - 233352. 652310 -00000 0.00 1,754.78 0.00 100461 BLEACH 10043272 200149 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,725.04 0.00 100245 SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE 10042192 211863 408 - 233352 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,704.51 0.00 100461 BLEACH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558863 VENDOR 460 - ALPHA CHEMICAL OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042314 209862 130 - 157710 - 652510 -00000 0.00 201.90 0.00 ENRICHED LOTION HAND SOAP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558864 VENDOR 550 - ALPHA OMEGA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 10042318 029250 001 - 010510 - 646710 -00000 0.00 101948 COPIES AND MAINT 10041627 029429 101 - 163620 - 646710 -00000 0.00 100342 COPIER MAINTENANCE 10041117 029263 408. 210151 - 651210.00000 0.00 101708 COPIER 10041105 029255 113 - 138915 - 644600 -00000 0.00 113 - 138915 - 651210 -00000 0.00 113 - 138915 - 641950 -00000 0.00 101554 RENTAL OF COPIER 10043279 029267 495 - 192370. 651210 -00000 0.00 100554 COPIER MAINTENANCE 10040341 029306 408- 210105 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100236 COPIER MAINTENANCE CHECK NO 559301 VENDOR 314200 - AMBIANCE AUDIO DESIGN & SECURITY 10041116 6299 408 - 210151 - 634999 -00000 0.00 TRIP CHARGE AND LABOR ADD AND DELETE CHECK NO 559403 VENDOR 342750 - AMERICAN FLAG AND BANNER COMPANY 10042908 455 111. 156332- 652990 -00000 0.00 107325 WIND DANCE SET CHECK NO 558865 VENDOR 690 - AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION 10042939 8475470 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 2001 PUBLIC LIBRARY DATA SERVICE STA 178.35 89.42 90.35 83.25 149.76 2.35 100.10 276.29 CHECK TOTAL 58.00 CHECK TOTAL 1,500.00 CHECK TOTAL 81.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 8 VCHR NET 201.90 201.90 178.35 89.42 90.35 235.36 100.10 276.29 969.87 58.00 58.00 1,500.00 1.500.00 81.00 81.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 558866 VENDOR 730 - AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 10042906 961522 111 - 138317 - 654110 -00000 0.00 65.95 0.00 PUBLICATIONS FOR PLANNING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559353 VENDOR 332550 - AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 10042901 038894 113 - 138312 - 654110 -00000 0.00 285.00 0.00 LAND USE LAW AND ZONING DIGEST CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559095 VENDOR 193950 AMERIGAS 10043315 A5578- 219915 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 6.36 0.00 TANK REFILL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558982 VENDOR 115830 AMJ EQUIPMENT CORPORATION 10042193 2001 -6413 408 - 233312 - 652990 -00000 0.00 3,740.00 408 - 233312 - 764990 -00000 0.00 1,660.00 408 - 233312 - 641950 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 106680 MAG METER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559338 VENDOR 326290 AMY TOZIER 10043223 TRVL 9/17 -28 A TOZIER 123. 155960 - 640200 -33060 0.00 31.32 0.00 TRVL 9/17 -28 A TOZIER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559280 VENDOR 303170 ANCHOR HEALTH CENTERS 10043275 R.PITTMAN 09/05/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 26.00 0.00 059369 MEDICAL SERVICES 10043275 M.DORNELUS 09/04/01 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 45.50 0.00 059369 MEDICAL SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559333 VENDOR 325730 - ANCHOR INDUSTRIES 10042427 563833 RI 111 - 156334 - 764990 -00000 0.00 2,739.73 0.00 107200 - FUNBRELLA OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559368 VENDOR 336510 ANCHOR TREE SERVICE 10042315 09/17/01 CLAM PASS 111 - 156332 - 646314.00000 0.00 497.00 0.00 PRUNE TREES CLAM PASS TRAN AREA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559285 VENDOR 306500 ANDREA TAYLOR 10043383 9/9 -26 TRVL A TAYLOR 001 - 156130. 640200.00000 0.00 19.72 0.00 9/9 -26 TRVL A TAYLOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559483 VENDOR 900080 ANGELO M. GASPARINO 212774 AMBREFGASPARINO1- 21 -31 &28 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 179.43 0.00 GASPARINO 0110514 -1 1 -21 -31 &2/8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559443 VENDOR 344460 - ANN RIFFLE 10042808 P EVANS 01 -1093 681 - 421190 - 631990 -00000 0.00 175.00 0.00 P EVANS 01 -1093 10042808 D RATLIFF 10 -1084 681 - 421190. 631990 -00000 0.00 175.00 0.00 D RATLIFF,STRONGHORSE,KLADO 01 -1084 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559383 VENDOR 339570 - ANOTHER PRINTER 10043129 09/19/01 COPIES ADGENDA 001 - 100130 - 647110.00000 0.00 1,092.00 0.00 107827 PRINTING COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559025 VENDOR 147700 - APAC OF FLORIDA, INC 10043002 #19 RETAINAGE 412- 000000 - 205100.00000 0.00 301.50- 0.00 4480 THRU 8/26/01 RETAINAGE 10043002 #19 412. 273511. 763100 -70844 0.00 3,015.00 0.00 4480 THRU 8/26/01 10043002 #19 (RETAINAGE) 313 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 50,721.28- 0.00 4480 - THRU 8/26/01 RETAINAGE OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 11 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043002 #19 313 - 163673. 763100 -69101 0.00 507,212.85 0.00 507,212.85 4480 - THRU 8/26/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 459,205.07 CHECK NO 559170 VENDOR 254050 - APPLIED TECHNOLOGY, INC. 10043282 7660 495 - 192330 - 646410 -00000 0.00 210.59 0.00 210.59 PRINTER DRIVER CKT BOARD TO REPAIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 210.59 CHECK NO 559337 VENDOR 325930 AQUA PURE OF SW FLORIDA, INC 10042916 647432 001 - 155910 - 652990.00000 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 WATER SOCIAL SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 70.00 CHECK NO 559382 VENDOR 339470 AQUAGENIX 10043305 307.2056 111 - 178980- 634999 -00000 0.00 3,420.00 0.00 3,420.00 107493 EXOTIC CONTROL 10043305 307 -2056R 111 - 178980- 634999 -00000 0.00 380.00 0.00 380.00 107493 EXOTIC CONTROL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,800.00 CHECK NO 559360 VENDOR 333590 AQUAM 10042313 060116 111. 156313- 652910 -00000 0.00 498.80 0.00 498.80 RESCUE EQUIPMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 498.80 CHECK NO 559046 VENDOR 161840 - AQUIFER MAINTENANCE & PERFORMANCE 10043270 21179 -1 408 - 253221. 634999 -00000 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 104758 MAINT OF HAWTHORNE WELLFIELD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.200.00 CHECK NO 559352 VENDOR 332490 - ARCHITECTURAL ACCENTS OF NAPLES, 10040739 99108 355 - 156175. 762200 -80259 0.00 6,290.00 0.00 6,290.00 104591 8FT FOUNTAIN FOR NCRL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,290.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10043280 5610394 -CM 408 - 233350 - 652990 -00000 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 18.40- 0.00 103428 SUPPLIES FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559415 VENDOR 343700 - ARCTIC AIR 103428 SUPPLIES 10042663 267200 191 - 138785 - 884200 -33751 0.00 1,700.00 0.00 408 - 233350. 652990 -00000 68890760000 G PAXTON 107694 95.00- 0.00 103428 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559279 VENDOR 302200 - AROMA EXPRESSIONS INC 408 - 233350 - 652990.00000 0.00 10042893 2241 495 - 192370 - 634999 -00000 0.00 38.00 0.00 101485 RESTROOM DEODERIZERS 10043280 5610258 -IN 408. 233350- 652990 -00000 0.00 764.82 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559029 VENDOR 148190 - ARSENE MAJUSTE 10043285 A,MAJUSTE 09/17/01 4 HRS 681 - 421190- 634402 -00000 0.00 64.00 0.00 204.50 4 HRS A,MAJUSTE 09/17/01 103428 SUPPLIES 10043285 A,MAJUSTE 09/25/01 3 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 48.00 0.00 3 HRS 09/25/01 MAJUSTE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559328 VENDOR 323320 - AT & T CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559313 VENDOR 318600 - ASTORIA- PACIFIC 10043280 5610394 -CM 408 - 233350 - 652990 -00000 0.00 18.40- 0.00 103428 SUPPLIES 10043280 5610278 -IN 408 - 233350- 652990 -00000 0.00 103.97 0.00 103428 SUPPLIES 10043280 5610393 -CM 408 - 233350. 652990 -00000 0.00 95.00- 0.00 103428 SUPPLIES 10043280 5610275 -CM 408 - 233350 - 652990.00000 0.00 250.00- 0.00 103428 SUPPLIES 10043280 5610258 -IN 408. 233350- 652990 -00000 0.00 764.82 0.00 103428 SUPPLIES 10043280 5610309 -IN 408- 233350 - 652990.00000 0.00 204.50 0.00 103428 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559328 VENDOR 323320 - AT & T 10042335 056 282 6925 001 09/13/01 001 - 156170 - 641900.00000 0.00 14.94 0.00 09/13/01 056 282 6925 001 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10043284 730 511 5383 001 09/18/01 09/18/01 730 511 5383 001 10043286 056 286 3919 001 09/07/01 09/07/01 056 286 3919 001 10043313 056 286 0364 001 09/21/01 09/21/01 056 286 0364 001 10042317 056 282 7604 001 09/13/01 09/13/01 056 282 7604 001 10042896 056 282 5935 001 09/13/01 09/13/01 056 282 5935 001 10043313 056 286 0993 001 09/21/01 09/21/01 056 286 0993 001 10042317 056 285 1090 001 09/10/01 09/10/01 056 285 1090 001 10043286 056 286 3920 001 09/07/01 09/07/01 056 286 3920 001 10043309 056 281 8867 001 09/21/01 09/21/01 056 281 8867 001 10043284 730 511 5457 001 09/18/01 09/18/01 730/511/5457/001 10043286 730 511 3524 001 09/03/01 09/03/01 730 511 3524 001 CHECK NO 559137 VENDOR 236190 - AT &T 10042350 030 091 6198 001 09/09/01 09/09/01 030 091 6198 001 10042350 056 282 6124 001 09/13/01 09/13/01 056 282 6124 001 10043314 730 511 5702 001 09/21/01 09/21/01 730 511 5702 001 10042336 030 295 0956 001 09/07/01 09/07/01 030 295 0956 001 10042894 020 017 6053 001 09/01/01 09/01/01 101991 LONG DISTANCE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155230 - 641900 -00000 0.00 146 - 144380 - 641900 -00000 0.00 408 - 233313 - 641100.00000 0.00 198 - 157410- 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 155810 - 641900 -00000 0.00 198 - 157430 - 641900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630. 641900 -00000 0.00 146. 144380 - 641900 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211 - 641100 -00000 0.00 001. 100110 - 641900 -00000 0.00 146 - 144380- 641900 -00000 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 37.64 0.00 17.24 0.00 30.47 0.00 14.94 0.00 14.94 0.00 112.93 0.00 14.94 0.00 14.94 0.00 26.36 0.00 14.23 0.00 15.43 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 13 VCHR NET 37.64 17.24 30.47 14.94 14.94 112.93 14.94 14.94 26.36 14.23 15.43 329.00 408 - 253212 - 641100 -00000 0.00 10.33 0.00 10.33 441 - 256110 - 641100 -00000 0.00 17.35 0.00 17.35 408 - 253212 - 641100 -00000 0.00 77.25 0.00 77.25 001 - 121710 - 641400 -00000 0.00 11.22 0.00 11.22 495 - 192350 - 641900 -00000 0.00 37.32 0.00 37.32 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 14 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042350 030 091 6198 001 09/09/01 408- 253211 - 641100 -00000 0.00 6.11 0.00 6.11 09/09/01 030 091 6198 001 10042336 730 510 1276 001 09/12/01 001 - 156110. 641900 -00000 0.00 25.69 0.00 25.69 09/12/01 730 510 1276 001 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 185.27 CHECK NO 559361 VENDOR 333620 • AT &T WIRELESS 10043287 10042487 09/13/01 001 - 454010 - 641700 -00000 0.00 14.10 0.00 14.10 09/13/01 1042487 CELL PHONE 10043276 10053654 09/13/01 146 - 144380 - 641700.00000 0.00 46.87 0.00 46.87 CELL PHONE BILL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.97 CHECK NO 559270 VENDOR 298920 AVATECH SOLUTIONS 10042460' REGISTRATION Y.XUE 001 - 172970 - 654360 -00000 0.00 995.00 0.00 995.00 107674 - REGISTRATION FOR Y.XUE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 995.00 CHECK NO 559314 VENDOR 318740 AVAYA, INC. 10043192 2710895948 9/1/01 001 - 000000 - 202800.00000 0.00 1,947.78 0.00 1,947.78 2710895948 9/1/01 10043192 2710111440 7/16/01 001. 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 2710111440 7/16/01 10043192 2710895305 9/2/01 001 - 000000. 202800 -00000 0.00 334.80 0.00 334.80 2710895305 9/2/01 10043192 2710886202 9/1/01 001- 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 3,719.00 0.00 3,719.00 2710886202 9/1/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,026.58 CHECK NO 559247 VENDOR 286720 AZTEK COMMUNICATIONS 10041101 1371 001 - 121143 - 634999 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 CAT -5 COMPUTER RUNS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 559318 VENDOR 320020 AZURIX NORTH AMERICA OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 15 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043281 201678 001 - 122240 - 652994 -00000 0.00 760.00 0.00 760.00 107573 EMERGENCY CALL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 760.00 CHECK NO 558974 VENDOR 109970 - B & B HYDRAULICS 10042886 42710 408 - 233312 - 652990 -00000 0.00 498.10 0.00 498.10 100738 HYDRAULIC HOSES AND FITTINGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 498.10 CHECK NO 559028 VENDOR 147980 - B & B TOWING 10041007 46002 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 100184 TOWING SERVICE 10041007 46070 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 100184 TOWING SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 70.00 CHECK NO 559079 VENDOR 179760 BACK BAY MARINA 10043283 80997 109 - 182602 - 646810 -00000 0.00 591.44 0.00 591.44 107772 REPAIR MOTOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 591.44 CHECK NO 558871 VENDOR 1740 BAKER & TAYLOR CO 10042499 5003281277 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 28.50 0.00 28.50 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041949 5003274276 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 1,679.14 0.00 1.679.14 101707 BOOKS 10042499 2008052662 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 20.97 0.00 20.97 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10042499 5003281280 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 71.11 0.00 71.11 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041017 5003262087 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 184.73 0.00 184.73 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003273732 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 1,069.82 0.00 1.069.82 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003259938 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 275.01 0.00 275.01 101707 BOOKS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 16 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041949 5003271782 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 45.34 0.00 45.34 BAKER & TAYLOR CO 10041017 5003255379 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 92.88 0.00 92.88 101707 BOOKS 10042499 5003281282 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 141.95 0.00 141.95 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041017 5003255378 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 58.10 0.00 58.10 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003255374 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 178.84 0.00 178.84 101707 BOOKS 10042499 3004743343 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 275.98 0.00 275.98 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041017 2007980977 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 155.80 0.00 155.80 101707 BOOKS 10042499 5003277133 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 98.34 0.00 98.34 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041017 5003253141 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 136.40 0.00 136.40 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003274277 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 159.75 0.00 159.75 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003262113 355. 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 154.57 0.00 154.57 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003274461 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 1,766.00 0.00 1,766.00 BAKER & TAYLOR CO 10042499 5003279123 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 30.40 0.00 30.40 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10042499 2008052494 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 116.27 0.00 116.27 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041949 2008034523 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 461.27 0.00 461.27 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003274260 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 660.27 0.00 660.27 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003255376 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 245.00 0.00 245.00 101707 BOOKS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 17 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042499 2008052516 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 116.29 0.00 116.29 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041017 5003254393 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 1.380.23 0.00 1,380.23 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003274278 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 438.14 0.00 438.14 101707 BOOKS 10042499 3004783361 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 245.99 0.00 245.99 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041949 5003273736 355. 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 286.45 0.00 286.45 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003258626 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 85.26 0.00 85.26 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003262086 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 506.38 0.00 506.38 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003274289 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 119.80 0.00 119.80 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003254528 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 26.34 0.00 26.34 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003264245 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 208.29 0.00 208.29 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003271782 129 - 156110 - 766100 -33773 0.00 13.19 0.00 13.19 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003274594 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 28.68 0.00 28.68 101707 BOOKS 10041017 2007967293 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 703.55 0.00 703.55 101707 BOOKS 10042499 5003281278 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 47.72 0.00 47.72 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041949 5003274274 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 388.42 0.00 388.42 101707 BOOKS 10041949 3004761661 355- 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 419.78 0.00 419.78 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003255377 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 422.08 0.00 422.08 101707 BOOKS OCTOBER 02, 2001 VCHR DISC COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 5.37 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 80.23 0.00 463.55 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 0.00 112.02 0.00 FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10042499 5003281279 0.00 355. 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 14.24 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041017 5003264246 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 101707 BOOKS 10042499 2008053054 355. 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041949 5003274452 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003274275 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 101707 BOOKS 10041949 5003274273 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003255375 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 101707 BOOKS 10042499 2008061445 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10041949 5003275541 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003262085 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 101707 BOOKS 10041017 5003262084 355 - 156190. 766100.00000 0.00 101707 BOOKS 10042499 5003281281 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 107787 - TITLES FOR ALL LOCATIONS 10042499 5003280353 355. 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 107787 - 10041017 5003259902 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 101707 BOOKS CHECK NO 559484 VENDOR 900080 - BARRY L. MARK 212772 AMB REF MARK 06/24/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 AMB REF MARK 0125972 -1 06/24/01 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 64.56 0.00 5.37 0.00 80.23 0.00 463.55 0.00 175.39 0.00 112.02 0.00 99.68 0.00 16.09 0.00 257.72 0.00 85.96 0.00 14.00 0.00 14.24 0.00 2,082.45 413.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.19 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 18 VCHR NET 64.56 5.37 80.23 463.55 175.39 112.02 99.68 16.09 257.72 85.96 14.00 14.24 2,082.45 413.30 17.427.59 15.19 15.19 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559151 VENDOR 240380 - BAYSIDE UPHOLSTERY 10040336 382194 111 - 156313. 646970 -00000 0.00 550.00 0.00 101402 REUPHOLSTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559321 VENDOR 321490 - BEACH CONSTRUCTION CO 10043389 #5 412- 273511 - 763100 -70072 0.00 45,893.48 103418 THRU 8/23/01 10043389 #5 411 - 273511 - 763100 -70073 0.00 45,893.48 103418 THRU 8/23/01 10043389 #5 (RETAINAGE) 411 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 2,294.68- 103418 - THRU 8/23/01 (RETAINAGE) 10043389 #5 (RETAINAGE) 412. 000000- 205100 -00000 0.00 2,294.67- 103418 - THRU 8/23/01 (RETAINAGE) CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 559131 VENDOR 231290 - BEACH TECH 10042195 10117005 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100064 FLEET INVENTORY CHECK NO 559071 VENDOR 173430 - BEAUMONT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 10042892 22952 495 - 192370- 634999 -00000 0.00 102255 SECURITY MONITORING CHECK NO 559458 VENDOR 900050 - BEAZER HOMES FLORIDA. INC. 212722 REF: 289067 BEAZER HOMES 113 - 000000- 115420.00000 0.00 REF: 289067 BEAZER HOMES FLORIDA,INC CHECK NO 559116 VENDOR 214780 - BERRY'S BARBELL & EQUIPMENT CO. 10042344 014192 111 - 156313 - 646970 -00000 0.00 101405 VETERANS PARK REPAIRS 10042344 014478 111 - 156313 - 646970 -00000 0.00 101405 VETERANS PARK REPAIRS 679.85 CHECK TOTAL 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 530.00 CHECK TOTAL 172.50 450.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 20 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042344 014511 111 - 156313. 646970 -00000 0.00 73.00 0.00 73.00 101405 VETERANS PARK REPAIRS 10042594 00421 -00 111 - 156313 - 652910.00000 0.00 8,381.06 0.00 8,381.06 106277 DUMBELL RACK 10042900 08/27/01 111 - 156349 - 652910 -00000 0.00 109.00 0.00 109.00 HOIST WEIGHT TREE TO HOLD WEIGHTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,185.56 CHECK NO 559291 VENDOR 310090 - BETH YANG PLANNER II /MPO 10042462 9/11 -13 TRAVEL BETH YANG 101 - 163612 - 640300 -00000 0.00 161.68 0.00 161.68 9/11 -13 TRAVEL BETH YANG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 161.68 CHECK NO 558872 VENDOR 1910 - BETTER ROADS, INC. 10042349 21605 111 - 156332 - 646315 -00000 0.00 757.24 0.00 757.24 106836 BASE ROCK 10043274 21008 408 - 253212 - 653130 -00000 0.00 109.05 0.00 109.05 101153 ASPHALY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 866.29 CHECK NO 559427 VENDOR 344100 BEUCHEL & BEUCHEL TOTAL JOINT 10042915 R,NICHOLS 07/27/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 2,899.00 0.00 2,899.00 107842 MEDICAL BILLS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,899.00 CHECK NO 559254 VENDOR 290060 BIG CYPRESS BASIN /SFWMD 10043409 IN -01 -199 325. 172952. 631990 -31012 0.00 135,000.00 0.00 135,000.00 916395 - BELLE MEADE MAPPING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 135,000.00 CHECK NO 559244 VENDOR 285340 - BILL SMITH APPLIANCES 10042345 559743 111 - 156395. 652910 -00000 0.00 499.98 0.00 499.98 27" SHARP TV FOR NEW FITNESS CENTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 499.98 CHECK NO 558873 VENDOR 2310 - BOB DEAN SUPPLY, INC. OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 21 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042319 875170 408 - 233352 - 655100 -00000 0.00 337.00 0.00 337.00 101829 METAL AND RELATED ITEMS 10042319 875109 408 - 233352 - 655100.00000 0.00 304.26 0.00 304.26 101829 METAL AND RELATED ITEMS 10042907 853524 521 - 122410. 646425.00000 0.00 63.64 0.00 63.64 PAYMENT FOR CREDIT WE SHOULD NOT TAK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 704.90 CHECK NO 559010 VENDOR 133300 - BOB TAYLOR CHEVROLET 10041098 112366 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 19.76 0.00 19.76 100126 SERVICE AND LABOR 10041098 112458 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 15.94 0.00 15.94 100126 SERVICE AND LABOR 10041098 112429 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 41.36 0.00 41.36 100126 SERVICE AND LABOR 10041108 CM108100 *1 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 40.00- 0.00 40.00- 100126 CORE RETURN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 37.06 CHECK NO 559061 VENDOR 168720 BONITA AUTO SUPPLY /NAPA 10041109 538944 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 41.96 0.00 41.96 100148 AUTO PARTS 10041110 539718 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 17.02 0.00 17.02 100148 AUTO PARTS 10041110 539729 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 102.00 0.00 102.00 100148 AUTO PARTS 10041110 538578 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 51.57 0.00 51.57 100148 AUTO PARTS 10041110 539644 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 6.28 0.00 6.28 100148 AUTO PARTS 10042200 539966 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 4.83 0.00 4.83 100148 FLEET PARTS 10041110 538818 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 13.14 0.00 13.14 100148 AUTO PARTS CHECK NO 559261 VENDOR 293380 - BQ CONCRETE 10043303 1011 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100212 INSTALLATION OF DRIVEWAYS 10043303 1010 408 - 253212. 634999 -00000 0.00 100212 INSTALLATION OF DRIVEWAYS 10043303 1009 408. 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100212 INSTALLATION OF DRIVEWAYS CHECK NO 559033 VENDOR 151240 - BSN 10042914 498755 107166 AUTHLETIC SUPPLIES 10042312 90744764 MEGAPHONES 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 111 - 156313 - 652910.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559350 VENDOR 332300 - BUMPER TO BUMPER A/P 10042201 290810 521 - 122410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 TRAINING CLASS 1,121.23 0.00 1,121.23 1,404.16 0.00 1,404.16 966.72 OCTOBER 02, 2001 CHECK TOTAL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 22 REPORT 100 -601 462.00 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 462.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.523.06 198.00 0.00 198.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 198.00 FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10041110 539408 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 5.24 0.00 5.24 100148 AUTO PARTS 10041110 538828 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 7.82 0.00 7.82 100148 AUTO PARTS 10041110 538574 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 13.14 0.00 13.14 100148 AUTO PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 263.00 CHECK NO 559088 VENDOR 187560 - BOOKS ON TAPE INC. 10042899 4544990M 307 - 156110 - 652670 -00000 0.00 105.00 0.00 105.00 059339 BOOKS ON TAPE 10042899 4546709P 307 - 156110 - 652670 -00000 0.00 164.00 0.00 164.00 059339 BOOKS ON TAPE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 269.00 CHECK NO 559261 VENDOR 293380 - BQ CONCRETE 10043303 1011 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100212 INSTALLATION OF DRIVEWAYS 10043303 1010 408 - 253212. 634999 -00000 0.00 100212 INSTALLATION OF DRIVEWAYS 10043303 1009 408. 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100212 INSTALLATION OF DRIVEWAYS CHECK NO 559033 VENDOR 151240 - BSN 10042914 498755 107166 AUTHLETIC SUPPLIES 10042312 90744764 MEGAPHONES 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 111 - 156313 - 652910.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559350 VENDOR 332300 - BUMPER TO BUMPER A/P 10042201 290810 521 - 122410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 TRAINING CLASS 1,121.23 0.00 1,121.23 1,404.16 0.00 1,404.16 966.72 0.00 966.72 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,492.11 2,061.06 0.00 2,061.06 462.00 0.00 462.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.523.06 198.00 0.00 198.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 198.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 23 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 559274 VENDOR 299180 - BUMPER TO BUMPER PARTS DEPO 10041111 I260077 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 12.38 0.00 12.38 101131 FLEET FILTERS 10042198 I260023 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 45.52 0.00 45.52 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041111 I259737 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 4.99 0.00 4.99 101131 FLEET FILTERS 10042198 I259754 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 323.73 0.00 323.73 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I259976 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 17.55 0.00 17.55 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I259795 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 19.92 0.00 19.92 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042197 C22421 521. 122410. 646425.00000 0.00 11.46- 0.00 11.46- 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041111 I260071 521. 122410- 646425.00000 0.00 25.84 0.00 25.84 101131 FLEET FILTERS 10042198 I259736 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 4.09 0.00 4.09 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I260043 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 45.85 0.00 45.85 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I260045 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 137.54 0.00 137.54 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I260013 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 16.62 0.00 16.62 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I259770 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 9.13 0.00 9.13 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041111 I260015 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 25.84 0.00 25.84 101131 FLEET FILTERS 10042198 I259640 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 5.98 0.00 5.98 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041111 I259729 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 2.31 0.00 2.31 101131 FLEET FILTERS OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042198 I259668 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I260020 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I259762 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041111 I259898 101131 FLEET FILTERS 10042198 I259980 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I260016 101524 FLEET PARTS 10041111 I259697 101131 FLEET FILTERS 10042197 C22422 101524 FLEET PARTS 10042198 I259922 101524 FLEET PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559376 VENDOR 338610 - BURNS VETERINARY SUPPLY 10041112 5266135 001 - 155410. 652710 -00000 106276 VET SUPPLIES 10041112 5264911 001 - 155410 - 652710.00000 106276 VET SUPPLIES 10041112 5265362 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 106276 VET SUPPLIES CHECK NO 559330 VENDOR 324500 - BUSINESS HEALTH 10041100 CCS0800 -1 001. 122255 - 649010 -00000 BRIEF PHYSICAL FOR SIX SECURITY OFFO CHECK NO 559459 VENDOR 900050 - C.H.E.A.C.C. 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 3.62 0.00 11.17 0.00 46.22 0.00 6.98 0.00 3.17 0.00 37.25 0.00 16.90 0.00 5.98- 0.00 27.41 CHECK TOTAL 484.60 335.65 51.28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 330.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 24 VCHR NET 3.62 11.17 46.22 6.98 3.17 37.25 16.90 5.98- 27.41 832.57 484.60 335.65 51.28 871.53 330.00 330.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 212777 REFUND -PARKS C.H.E.A.C.C. 670 - 000000. 220010 -00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 REFUND -PARKS C.H.E.A.C.C. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558970 VENDOR 108520 CAMP, DRESSER & MCKEE, INC. 10043154 80098944/2 470 - 173410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 11,504.00 0.00 105840 - 7/29/01 THRU 9/1/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558875 VENDOR 2860 CAPRI LAWN & GARDEN EQUIP 10041564 72839 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 31.31 0.00 105953 SUPPLIES 10041564 72850 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 303.96 0.00 105953 SUPPLIES 10041564 73004 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 22.27 0.00 105953 SUPPLIES 10041564 12823 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 20.43 0.00 105953 SUPPLIES 10041564 72887 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 132.95 0.00 105953 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559159 VENDOR 247990 - CARDIAC SURGICAL ASSOCIATES 10042501 L. KODAK 7/11- 12,7/31 SVC 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 4,926.35 0.00 107520 - L. KODAK 7/11- 12,7/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558874 VENDOR 2810 CARLTON, FIELDS, WARD, EMMANUAL, 10042158 236211 111 - 138317 - 631100 -00000 0.00 7,962.72 0.00 101931 - THRU 5/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559485 VENDOR 900080 CARMELA MICELI 212776 AMB.REF C.MICILI 7/3/01 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 60.98 0.00 AMBULANCE REFUND C.MICELI 7/3/01 PAGE 25 VCHR NET 200.00 200.00 11,504.00 11,504.00 31.31 303.96 22.27 20.43 132.95 510.92 4,926.35 4,926.35 7,962.72 7,962.72 60.98 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 26 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.98 CHECK NO 559107 VENDOR 201920 CARTER FENCE COMPANY INC. 10042562 7997 111 - 156332 - 646317 -00000 0.00 595.00 0.00 595.00 103224 REPAIR FENCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 595.00 CHECK NO 559460 VENDOR 900050 CASSANDRA RAMIREZ 212781 C RAMIREZ REFUND PARKS 670 - 000000- 220010 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 C RAMIREZ REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 559259 VENDOR 291140 CENTER POINT PUBLISHING 10041408 227677 355 - 156190. 766100 -00000 0.00 65.88 0.00 65.88 105223 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 65.88 CHECK NO 559171 VENDOR 254690 CENTURY RAIN AID 10042561 545677 109 - 182901. 646311 -00000 0.00 247.90 0.00 247.90 SPRINKLER PARTS 10042502 526085 322 - 183825 - 646311 -00000 0.00 825.10 0.00 825.10 107560 - SPRINKLER SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,073.00 CHECK NO 559040 VENDOR 158370 - CHARLES RICE 10042452 9/4 -6 TRAVEL CHARLES RICE 681 - 431310 - 640300 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 9/4 -6 TRAVEL CHARLES RICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.00 CHECK NO 559239 VENDOR 283030 - CHARRETTE CORPORATION 10042136 91139870 111 - 138313 - 651110 -00000 0.00 339.60 111 - 138313 - 641950 -00000 0.00 37.58 0.00 377.18 57262 - PLOTTER BOND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 377.18 CHECK NO 559011 VENDOR 133880 - CHECKPOINT OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 27 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042415 5617 9/1- 8/31/02 470 - 173435 - 634999 -00000 0.00 297.00 0.00 297.00 59098 - ANNUAL MONITORING AGREEMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 297.00 CHECK NO 559054 VENDOR 165950 - CHECKPOINT, LTD. 10042560 I15737 001. 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 SIMPLEX SECURITY SYSTEM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 300.00 CHECK NO 559094 VENDOR 193460 CHEMICAL LIME COMPANY 10042159 00126791 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2,792.96 0.00 2,792.96 100248 - SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,792.96 CHECK NO 559322 VENDOR 321610 CHRISTINE STYLES 10042687 8/1.9/20 JAllERCISE INST. 111 - 156380. 634999 -00000 0.00 818.35 0.00 818.35 107805 8/1 -9/20 JAllERCISE INSTRUCT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 818.35 CHECK NO 559341 VENDOR 326780 - CINDY LONG 10042456 9/6 -8 TRAVEL CINDY LONG 490. 144618 - 640300 -00000 0.00 122.60 0.00 122.60 9/6 -8 TRAVEL CINDY LONG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 122.60 CHECK NO 558876 VENDOR 3390 CITY OF NAPLES 10043407 1264/3016 194 - 101540 - 882100.10296 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 105393 - 7/4 -7/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25,000.00 CHECK NO 559062 VENDOR 168900 CITY OF NAPLES 10043394 COLLECTIONS WE 9/28/01 408 - 000000 - 208750 -00000 0.00 1,736.19 408- 000000 - 208751 -00000 0.00 436.73 408 - 000000- 208756 -00000 0.00 3,045.00 408 - 000000 - 208758 -00000 0.00 650.00 408 - 000000 - 208762.00000 0.00 75.00 408. 000000- 208764 -00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 6,022.92 COLLECTIONS WE 9/28/01 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 28 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043395 LOCKBOX W/E 9/28/01 408 - 000000- 208750 -00000 0.00 5,111.66 408 - 000000 - 208751 -00000 0.00 1,280.44 408 - 000000 - 208764 -00000 0.00 19.34 0.00 6,411.44 LOCKBOX W/E 9/28/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 12,434.36 CHECK NO 559486 VENDOR 900080 - CLAIR LONG 212750 AMB REF LONG 6/6/01 490. 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 28.42 0.00 28.42 AMB REF LONG 0124481 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 28.42 CHECK NO 558877 VENDOR 3420 - CLEAN AIR 10042134 461738 408 - 233351. 652990 -00000 0.00 463.75 0.00 463.75 57953 - CLEANING RAGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 463.75 CHECK NO 558854 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 10042426 CC VS. WILLIAM KRAMER 313 - 163673 - 761100 -63041 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400.00 CHECK NO 558855 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 10043100 PARCEL 99/915 #91 -3983 138 - 112555 - 635700.68065 0.00 14,700.00 0.00 14,700.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14,700.00 CHECK NO 559487 VENDOR 900080 - CLIFFORD E DAVIS 212754 AMB REF DAVIS 5/9/01 490- 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 63.95 0.00 63.95 AMB REF DAVIS 0122137 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 63.95 CHECK NO 559188 VENDOR 257590 - COLLIER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 10043406 SEPTEMBER 2001 001 - 155810 - 881100 -00000 0.00 53,416.67 0.00 53,416.67 100261 SEPTEMBER 2001 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 53,416.67 CHECK NO 558853 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 29 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043302 #20010162 TAGS 8 TITLE 408 - 233351 - 649010.00000 0.00 52.85 0.00 52.85 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52.85 CHECK NO 558879 VENDOR 3690 - COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DIV. 10042812 05101636000 8/8 -9/10 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 117.38 0.00 117.38 05101636000 8/8 -9/10 10042813 04901636200 8/9 -9/11 111 - 163646- 643400 -00000 0.00 44.00 0.00 44.00 04901636200 8/9 -9/11 10042812 05404171300 8/13.9/12 111 - 156313 - 643400 -00000 0.00 1,204.06 0.00 1,204.06 05404171300 8/13 -9/12 10042813 05108341500 8/10 -9/12 408 - 233312 - 643400 -00000 0.00 1,408.52 0.00 1,408.52 05108341500 8/10 -9/12 10042812 05400738300 8/13 -9/12 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 05400738300 8/13 -9/12 10042813 04305557801 8/2 -9/5 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 109.28 0.00 109.28 04305557801 8/2 -9/5 10042813 04901635900 8/8 -9/5 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 22.15 0.00 22.15 04901635900 8/8 -9/5 10042258 04817635000 8/8- 9/10/01 408 - 233351 - 643400 -00000 0.00 12.80 0.00 12.80 04817635000 8/8. 9/10/01 10042813 02033620900 8/13 -9/13 470 - 173431 - 643400 -00000 0.00 1,436.66 0.00 1,436.66 02033620900 8/13 -9/13 10042813 04901636100 8/8 -9/5 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 98.81 0.00 98.81 04901636100 8/8 -9/5 10042813 05100642800 8/10 -9/12 408. 233351- 643400 -00000 0.00 45.44 0.00 45.44 05100642800 8/10 -9/12 10042813 04809876801 8/8 -9/11 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 04809876801 8/8 -9/11 10042813 04304356201 8/2.9/5 111 - 163646. 643400 -00000 0.00 209.07 0.00 209.07 04304356201 8/2.9/5 10042812 05104076500 8/10 -9/13 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 103.17 0.00 103.17 05104076500 8/10 -9/13 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,949.34 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559125 VENDOR 227020 - COLLIER TIRE & AUTO REPAIR 10042847 069564 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 37.88 0.00 59414 10042845 069739 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 208.56 0.00 59423 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559348 VENDOR 330810 COLOR TEC COPY CENTER 10042844 4817 408. 233351 - 647110 -00000 0.00 480.00 0.00 53746 PRINTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559136 VENDOR 235530 COLOR TEC COPY CNETER 10042795 4824 111 - 138911. 647110 -00000 0.00 316.89 0.00 101637 COPIES 10042121 4772 111 - 156380 - 651210 -00000 0.00 125.05 0.00 101085 COPIES 10042126 4816 111 - 156381 - 651210 -00000 0.00 32.56 0.00 104979 - COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559195 VENDOR 260030 COLOR WHEEL PAINT 10042264 117033137 111 - 156332 - 646313.00000 0.00 1,092.50 0.00 100616 PAINT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559402 VENDOR 342620 COLORADO TIME SYSTEMS 10042120 74224 306 - 116360- 764990 -00162 0.00 999.00 0.00 107279 INFINITY SYSTEMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559296 VENDOR 313220 - COLUMBIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP 10043188 3640 111 - 100210 - 631990 -00000 0.00 2,788.75 0.00 104877 CONSULTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 135.83 71.17 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 96,592.00 0.00 FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 559289 VENDOR 309030 - COM -NET ERICSSON CRITICAL RADIO 96,974.83 10043102 0781921/CO28657 188 - 140480 - 646610.00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 100414 REPAIRS 8,928.45 0.00 10043102 0781922/CO28657 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 300.00 100414 REPAIRS 300.00 10043102 0852098/CO28657 188 - 140480- 646610 -00000 0.00 100414 MAINT. 10043102 781919/CO28657 188 - 140480- 646610 -00000 0.00 100414 REPAIRS 10043102 0781912/CO28657 188 - 140480 - 646610 -00000 0.00 100414 REPAIRS CHECK NO 558960 VENDOR 103750 - COMMERCIAL GLASS & RESTAURANT SUP 10042257 091996 114 - 178975 - 764990 -00000 107221 ICE MACHINE CHECK NO 558979 VENDOR 115280 - COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTENANCE 10041744 994325 001 - 126334 - 634999 -00000 107690 LAWN MAINT. 10043182 994322 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 100876 BAL. REF.INV.993139 10042912 994015 413 - 263611 - 763100 -74036 107792 WORK ON RADIO ROAD 10042124 992756 111- 163646 - 634999 -00000 100859 LANDSCAPING CHECK NO 559200 VENDOR 263070 - COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 10042252 422224 146 - 144380- 646610 -00000 107632 BATTERY 10042843 421105 001 - 121143. 646610 -00000 58944 SUPPLIES 16JI PAGE 31 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 135.83 0.00 135.83 71.17 0.00 71.17 96,592.00 0.00 96,592.00 155.83 0.00 155.83 20.00 0.00 20.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 96,974.83 0.00 1,800.00 0.00 1,800.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,800.00 0.00 1,600.00 0.00 1,600.00 0.00 207.00 0.00 207.00 0.00 3,435.50 0.00 3,435.50 0.00 3,685.95 0.00 3,685.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8,928.45 0.00 625.25 0.00 625.25 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559180 VENDOR 256240 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC 10042846 422833 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 58739 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559488 VENDOR 900080 CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE 212748 AMB REF MORRIS 3/16/2001 490- 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 59.81 0.00 AMB REF MORRIS 0116584.1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559489 VENDOR 900080 - CONNIE J CAHILL, GUARDIAN 212749 AMB REF MCPARTLIN 6/8/01 490. 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 201.54 0.00 AMB REF MCPARTLIN 0124685 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559233 VENDOR 281620 - CONSOLIDATED POWER SERVICES, INC. 10042801 210692 408 - 253211. 634999 -00000 0.00 4,791.18 0.00 101614 REPAIRS 10043101 210730 408- 233352 - 634999 -00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 100462 REPAIRS 10042802 210727 408 - 253221- 634999 -00000 0.00 369.80 0.00 100401 REPAIRS 10042801 210701 408 - 253211 - 634999.00000 0.00 3,330.45 0.00 101614 REPAIRS 10042802 210727 408 - 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,230.20 0.00 101614 REPAIRS 10042801 210728 408 - 253211 - 634999.00000 0.00 1,280.00 0.00 101614 REPAIRS 10041551 210712 414 - 263611 - 763100 -73916 0.00 11,200.00 0.00 103782 MODIFY VALVES 10042802 210717 408 - 253221- 634999.00000 0.00 1,040.00 0.00 100401 REPAIRS 10043101 210718 408 - 233352 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 100462 REPAIRS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 33 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042800 210714 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 560.00 0.00 560.00 104267 REPAIRS 10042802 210691 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 4,900.00 0.00 4,900.00 100401 REPAIRS 10042799 210726 441 - 256110 - 634999.00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 100282 REPAIRS 10043101 210746 408 - 233352 - 634999 -00000 0.00 120.00 0.00 120.00 100462 REPAIRS 10042801 210705 408. 253211- 634999 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.00 101614 REPAIRS 10043101 210739 408- 233352 - 634999 -00000 0.00 6,661.15 0.00 6,661.15 100462 REPAIRS 10042802 210708 408 - 253221 - 634999.00000 0.00 4,040.00 0.00 4,040.00 100401 REPAIRS 10042801 210709 408. 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2,160.00 0.00 2,160.00 101614 REPAIRS 10042266 210715 408 - 253212. 634999 -00000 0.00 3,200.00 0.00 3,200.00 100280 SERVICE 10042265 210716 408 - 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 800.00 0.00 800.00 101614 SERVICE 10042802 210661 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,628.60 0.00 1,628.60 100401 REPAIRS 10042800 210714 408 - 253211. 634999 -00000 0.00 1,120.00 0.00 1,120.00 101614 REPAIRS 10042801 210705 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 884.00 0.00 884.00 100280 REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 51.551.38 CHECK NO 558861 VENDOR 325820 CORPORATE BENEFIT SERVICES 20000013 10 /01 ADMIN FEES 517 - 121640. 631153 -00000 0.00 25,770.00 0.00 25,770.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25,770.00 CHECK NO 559457 VENDOR 900040 CRAIG & KAREN DAHL OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 212745 03300572801 C DAHL 408 - 000000- 115001 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 821.109 AVE N (C DAHL) CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559436 VENDOR 344310 CRC PRESS LLC 5.94 10042842 A1O61339 14.85 001 - 172970 - 654110.00000 0.00 35.64 56285 HANDBOOK 2.97 0.00 2.97 CHECK NO 559288 VENDOR 308630 CREEL TRACTOR, CO. 10042129 176142 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100701 SUPPLIES 10042129 175958 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 100701 SUPPLIES 10042129 176150 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 100701 SUPPLIES 10042129 175979 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 100701 SUPPLIES 10042129 176015 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100701 SUPPLIES 10042129 176007 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 100701 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 558880 VENDOR 4400 - CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 10043319 811612 9/24/01 408 - 233352 - 652990 -00000 0.00 101216 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 10043322 295923 9/24/01 470 - 173435 - 652990 -00000 0.00 101949 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 10043320 207258 9/24/01 408- 233312 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100746 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 10043024 876367 9/24/01 101 - 163630 - 634999.00000 0.00 102640 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 10043023 789834 9/24/01 001. 101520 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100454 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 145.94 CHECK TOTAL 83.44 125.04 212.44 14.38 5.52 141.12 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 34 VCHR NET 30.00 30.00 145.94 145.94 83.44 125.04 212.44 14.38 5.52 141.12 581.94 11.88 0.00 11.88 5.94 0.00 5.94 14.85 0.00 14.85 35.64 0.00 35.64 2.97 0.00 2.97 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10043318 305144 9/24/01 100900 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 10043028 240291 9/24/01 101016 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 10043027 206631 9/24/01 100620 BOTTLED WATER 10043021 805119 9/24/01 100405 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 10043321 206714 9/24/01 100566 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 10043025 869164 9/24/01 100470 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 10043026 207803 9/24/01 101279 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 559206 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408 - 210130- 652990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 001 - 010110 - 652990 -00000 0.00 001 - 138710 - 652990 -00000 0.00 408 - 233350 - 652990 -00000 0.00 101. 163610 - 634999 -00000 O.OQ 470 - 173441 - 652990.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558958 VENDOR 102780 - CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 10043022 884841 9/24/01 518 - 121630 - 649990 -00000 0.00 103580 BOTTLED WATER 9/24/01 CHECK NO 558984 VENDOR 117260 - CYNTHIA'S PARTY WORLD 10041514 09/05/01 RENTAL OF TABLES 333 - 163650 - 644800.60061 0.00 RENTAL OF SEVERAL BANQUET CHECK NO 559206 VENDOR 265700 - DADE PAPER COMPANY 20.79 10042421 342639 0.00 111 - 156390 - 652510 -00000 0.00 35.64 59299 - SUPPLIES 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 10043183 326501 111 - 156334 - 652510 -00000 0.00 100674 CAN LINERS 10043184 337429 111 - 156313 - 652510 -00000 0.00 101231 CAM LINERS 10043186 360316 111 - 156395 - 652510.00000 0.00 106590 CAN LINERS 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 17.82 0.00 51.55 0.00 20.79 0.00 5.84 0.00 190.32 0.00 35.64 0.00 29.70 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 23.76 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 171.61 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 35 VCHR NET 17.82 51.55 20.79 5.84 190.32 35.64 29.70 422.94 23.76 23.76 171.61 171.61 250.87 0.00 250.87 475.54 0.00 475.54 109.74 0.00 109.74 91.45 0.00 91.45 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 36 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 927.60 CHECK NO 559112 VENDOR 208790 - DANIEL CROFT 10042458 9/12.14 TRAVEL DAN CROFT 521 - 122410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 36.00 9/12 -14 TRAVEL DAN CROFT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 36.00 CHECK NO 559490 VENDOR 900080 - DANIEL N HEETER 212751 AMB REF HEETER 3/31/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 62.00 0.00 62.00 AMB REF HEETER 0118303 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 62.00 CHECK NO 559303 VENDOR 314930 - DAVID CHALICK 10042667 9/13 TRVL D CHALICK 001. 156110 - 640200 -00000 0.00 10.44 0.00 10.44 9/13 TRVL D CHALICK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10.44 CHECK NO 559434 VENDOR 344260 - DAVID GONZALEZ 10042457 8/20. 9/20/01 TRVL GONZLEZ 130 - 157710 - 640200 -00000 0.00 22.91 0.00 22.91 8/20- 9/20/01 TRAVEL D.GONZALEZ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 22.91 CHECK NO 558881 VENDOR 4610 - DAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH 10043107 H MCPARTLIN 99 -10027 681 - 431590 - 631010 -00000 0.00 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 H MCPARTLIN 99- 10027,00- 0082,99.6260 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,350.00 CHECK NO 559372 VENDOR 337500 - DAVID P. ROGOFF 10043103 8/11 - 9/7/01 001 - 155810- 631700 -00000 0.00 10,807.35 0.00 10,807.35 106349 CONSULTING FEES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10,807.35 CHECK NO 558991 VENDOR 126650 - DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 10043150 00510.00- 0000007 126 - 138332- 634999.33202 0.00 775.28 0.00 775.28 102389 - 7/26/01 THRU 8/25/01 10043151 00508.00- 0000005 126 - 138332 - 634999 -33202 0.00 9,354.63 0.00 9,354.63 102364 - 7/26/01 THRU 8/25/01 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 37 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10,129.91 CHECK NO 559053 VENDOR 165270 - DAVIDSON TITLES INC. 10042425 23978 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 145.08 0.00 145.08 59234 - CHILDRENS BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 145.08 CHECK NO 559193 VENDOR 259540 - DAWN CHRISTENSEN 10042473 P.RATLIFF,KLADO,STRNGHRSE 681. 421190 - 631990 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 D.RATLIFF,KLADO,STRONGHORSE 01 -1084 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 CHECK NO 559017 VENDOR 138670 - DEBBI MAXON 10043225 D MAXON TRVL 9/17 -28 123. 155960- 640200 -33060 0.00 15.08 123 - 155960 - 640300 -33060 0.00 24.94 0.00 40.02 D MAXON TRVL 9/17 -28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.02 CHECK NO 559092 VENDOR 193310 DEHART ALARM SYSTEMS, INC. 10042262 10295 111 - 156334. 646970 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 100791 LABOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.00 CHECK NO 559351 VENDOR 332420 DELL COMPUTER CORP 10041545 644296659 113 - 138900. 764900 -00000 0.00 13,095.00 0.00 13,095.00 107218 COMPUTER HARDWARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13,095.00 CHECK NO 558882 VENDOR 4970 - DEMCO 10042259 455139 001 - 156110 - 652610 -00000 0.00 121.19 0.00 121.19 100972 DISPLAY UNIT 10042259 454689 001 - 156110 - 652610.00000 0.00 69.99 0.00 69.99 100972 SLATWALL SHELF CHECK TOTAL 0.00 191.18 CHECK NO 559059 VENDOR 166780 - DENNIS GULLEY OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043108 9/4 -27 TRVL D GULLEY 111 - 156341 - 640200 -00000 0.00 118.90 0.00 9/4 -27 TRVL D GULLEY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559043 VENDOR 160920 DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES 10043179 23 -2574 7/01 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 6,513.26 0.00 23 -2574 7/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559035 VENDOR 153460 DICK BLICK 10042263 1481862 111 - 156381 - 652990 -00000 0.00 82.19 0.00 106839 ART SUPPLIES 10042263 1483669 111 - 156381. 652990.00000 0.00 1,049.72 0.00 106839 ART SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559290 VENDOR 309990 DIEGO'S SIGNS 10042255 4006 001 - 155410 - 652990.00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 59198 PLASTIC SIGN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559354 VENDOR 332580 DIGITAL NETWORK SYSTEMS, INC 10042127 24686 408 - 210130 - 651110 -00000 0.00 92.00 0.00 104980 - TONER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559339 VENDOR 326300 DIGITAL OFFICE SOLUTIONS 10042423 1890 111 - 156381 - 646710 -00000 0.00 35.00 111 - 156381 - 651210 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 59337 - COPIER MAINTENANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559127 VENDOR 228240 - DIVERSIFIED WELDING & MACHINING 10043201 9601 408 - 233312 - 646440 -00000 0.00 14,795.75 0.00 105501 REFURBISH TRAILER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 38 VCHR NET 118.90 118.90 6.513.26 6,513.26 82.19 1,049.72 1,131.91 200.00 200.00 92.00 92.00 71.00 71.00 14,795.75 14,795.75 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 559101 VENDOR 197160 - DIXIE GUN WORKS, INC. 10042849 1132095 01 198 - 157410 - 652960 -00000 0.00 59289 CHECK NO 558883 VENDOR 5270 - DOMESTIC CUSTOM METALS 10042261 10095 408 - 253211 - 655200 -00000 0.00 102330 STEEL PLATE CHECK NO 559327 VENDOR 323200 - DOMINO'S PIZZA 10042268 245 111 - 156349 - 652210 -00000 0.00 101636 9/2/01 CHECK NO 558961 VENDOR 104880 - DON HUNTER, SHERIFF 10043391 ADDT'L 9/30 CLAIM 199 - 611040 - 640980 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040 - 641100 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040- 651110 -00000 0.00 199. 611040 - 654360 -00000 0.00 199. 611040 - 764210 -00000 0.00 ADDT'L 9/30 CLAIM 10043391 ADDT'L 9/30 CLAIM 199 - 611040. 512100 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040 - 514100 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040 - 521100.00000 0.00 199 - 611040- 522100.00000 0.00 199 - 611040 - 523150 -00000 0.00 199. 611040 - 523160 -00000 0.00 199. 611040 - 524100 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040 - 640380 -00000 0.00 ADDT'L 9/30 CLAIM CHECK NO 558962 VENDOR 104885 - DON HUNTER, SHERIFF 10043093 CLAIM 9/26/01 199. 611040- 512100 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040 - 514100 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040. 521100 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040. 522100 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040 - 523150 -00000 0.00 199 - 611040 - 523160.00000 0.00 16JI PAGE 39 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 476.95 0.00 476.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 476.95 569.80 0.00 569.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 569.80 120.00 0.00 120.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 120.00 434.10 31,957.66 28.00 525.00 36,001.67 0.00 68,946.43 7,926.12 461.85 607.89 612.32 1,616.65 28.35 23.48 217.11 0.00 11,493.77 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 80,440.20 7,926.12 461.85 607.89 612.32 1.616.65 28.35 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 40 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 199 - 611040 - 524100.00000 0.00 23.48 199 - 611040 - 640380.00000 0.00 217.11 199 - 611040 - 640980 -00000 0.00 434.10 0.00 11,927.87 CLAIM #12 10043093 CLAIM 9/26/01 199 - 611040 - 641100 -00000 0.00 62.981.99 199 - 611040 - 651110 -00000 0.00 28.00 199 - 611040. 764210 -00000 0.00 36,001.67 199- 611040. 654360 -00000 0.00 525.00 0.00 99,536.66 CLAIM #12 10042693 DUI CLAIM #10 115 - 000000 - 206903.00000 0.00 9,979.50 0.00 9,979.50 DUI CLAIM #10 10043094 WIRELESS 911 9/01 189 - 000000 - 206903 -00000 0.00 15.752.36 0.00 15,752.36 WIRELESS 911 9/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 137,196.39 CHECK NO 558966 VENDOR 106680 DON HUNTER, SHERIFF 10043191 A5330 -26367 001 - 061010 - 643200.00000 0.00 694.42 0.00 694.42 A5330.26367 REIMB AMERIGAS 10043191 13874 REIMB COMBS 001 - 061010 - 643200.00000 0.00 2,307.85 0.00 2,307.85 13874 REIMB COMBS 10043191 14175 REIMB COMBS 001. 061010- 643200 -00000 0.00 2.067.75 0.00 2,067.75 14175 REIMB COMBS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,070.02 CHECK NO 559334 VENDOR 325740 DONNA L. FIALA 10042668 9/26 NAACP D. FIALA 001. 010110 - 640310 -01001 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 9/26 NAACP D. FIALA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 558884 VENDOR 5280 DONOVAN COURT REPORTING 10043189 11445 R DEVARISTE 01 -469 681 - 410310 - 633033 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 11445 R DEVARISTE 01- 469CFA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.00 CHECK NO 559396 VENDOR 341480 - DOUBLETREE COCOA BEACH- OCEANFRONT 10038754 84945668 N.GOETZ 10 /10 681 - 421510. 640300 -00000 0.00 184.00 0.00 184.00 58595 - 84945668 N. GOETZ 10 /10 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10038089 86905886 H.EISEN 10 /10 /01 058367 H EISEN 10 /10 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681 - 421510 - 640300 -00000 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 184.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559018 VENDOR 139090 - DOWNTOWN BOOK CENTER, INC. 10041515 00181769 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 242.01 SPANISH TITLES CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 559359 VENDOR 333540 - DR. RONALD HAMILTON, DVM BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 10042356 9/10- 14,9/24 -28 001 - 155410- 634999 -00000 0.00 2,500.00 313 - 163673 - 651210 -60171 104859 9/10- 14,9/24 -28 0.00 2555261 COPIES 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 559055 VENDOR 166500 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 0.00 10043204 NSF FEES 9/24 -9/28 001 - 000000 - 206901.00000 0.00 60.00 10042798 408 - 000000 - 206901.00000 0.00 260.00 001. 010510 - 651210 -00000 NSF FEES 9/24 -9/28 2556896 COPIES CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 559058 VENDOR 166510 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 0.00 10042794 2555261 0.00 313 - 163673 - 651210 -60171 0.00 0.00 2555261 COPIES 0.00 50.00 10043180 2557968 27.25 113 - 138312 - 649030 -00000 0.00 40.00 2557968 RECORDING 10042798 2556896 001. 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2556896 COPIES 10043180 2548292 681 - 421190 - 649035 -00000 0.00 2548292 RECORDING 10043180 2551613 681- 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 2551613 GUARDIAN AUDIT FEE 10042794 2555739 191. 138785 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2555739 RECORDING 10042798 2556536 313 - 163673. 651210 -00000 0.00 2556536 COPIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 41 VCHR NET 184.00 368.00 242.01 242.01 2,500.00 2,500.00 320.00 320.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 31.40 0.00 31.40 3.00 0.00 3.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 27.25 0.00 27.25 40.00 0.00 40.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10043403 2558006 0558006 RECORDING 10043180 2558123 2558123 RECORDING 10042794 2555263 2555263 COPIES 10042798 2557019 2557019 COPIES 10043180 2551615 2551615 GUARDIAN AUDIT FEE 10043180 2559889 2559889 COPIES 10042256 2551148 2551148 RECORDING 10043180 2558650 2558650 GUARDIAN AUDIT FEE 10042794 2557860 2557860 COPIES 10042254 2556484 2556484 RECORDING 10043180 2554274 2554274 GUARDIAN AUDIT FEE 10043180 2549505 2549505 RECORDING 10042798 2557029 2557029 RECORDING 10042798 2541150 2541150 COPIES 10042260 2548800 2548800 COPIES 10043180 2554277 2554277 GUARDIAN AUDIT FEE 10043180 2558124 2558124 RECORDING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 42 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 001 - 122310. 651210.00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 113 - 138312 - 649030.00000 0.00 68.90 0.00 68.90 313 - 163673 - 651210.60171 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 001 - 010510- 651210.00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 681 - 421190 - 634401.00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 001 - 010510- 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 414 - 263611 - 647110.74125 0.00 64.50 0.00 64.50 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 001 - 010510 - 651210.00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 001 - 156110 - 649010 -00000 0.00 13.20 0.00 13.20 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 681- 421190 - 649035 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 111 - 138911 - 651210 -00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 336 - 163650- 651210 -60101 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 001 - 122310- 651210.00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 113 - 138312 - 649030.00000 0.00 45.70 0.00 45.70 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6J 1 PAGE 43 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043180 2557971 113 - 138312. 649030 -00000 0.00 30.70 0.00 30.70 2557971 RECORDING 10042794 2558526 191 - 138785 - 651210 -00000 0.00 37.50 0.00 37.50 2558526 RECORDING 10043180 2556316 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 2556316 GUARDIAN AUDIT FEE 10043180 2558127 113 - 138312 - 649030 -00000 0.00 30.70 0.00 30.70 2558127 RECORDING 10043180 2558126 113 - 138312 - 649030 -00000 0.00 70.40 0.00 70.40 2558126 RECORDING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 816.25 CHECK NO 559461 VENDOR 900050 - EAGLE CREEK PROPERTIES, INC. 212730 REF.DEP.7 /8/98 EAGLE CRK. 670 - 000000 - 220113 -00000 0.00 1,067.30 0.00 1,067.30 EAGLE CREEK PROP.REFUND DEP.OF7 /8/98 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,067.30 CHECK NO 558886 VENDOR 5530 - EAST NAPLES FIRE DEPT 10043190 5/25,6/25 WASTE 001 - 061010 - 643300.00000 0.00 160.67 0.00 160.67 100396 UTILITY MAINT 10043190 8/5/01 WASTE 490 - 144610 - 643300 -00000 0.00 107.11 0.00 107.11 100396 UTILITY MAINT 10043190 5/1 -9/1 ENFD GENERATORS 490 - 144610 - 634999 -00000 0.00 120.00 0.00 120.00 100396 UTILITY MAINT 10043190 8/3,31/01 UTILITIES 490 - 144610. 643400 -00000 0.00 201.97 0.00 201.97 100396 UTILITY MAINT 10043190 8/12/01 NAPLES LAND 001- 061010- 646314 -00000 0.00 45.60 0.00 45.60 100396 UTILITY MAINT 10043190 6/4,7/9/01 UTILITIES 001 - 061010 - 643400.00000 0.00 302.96 0.00 302.96 100396 UTILITY MAINT 10043190 6/30/01 NAPLES LAND 490 - 144610 - 646314 -00000 0.00 68.40 0.00 68.40 100396 UTILITIES MAINT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.006.71 CHECK NO 559097 VENDOR 194820 - EASTERN AERO MARINE OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042905 110073 INSPECTION AND RECERTIFICATION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001- 144510 - 649990.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559074 VENDOR 174350 - ELITE FIRE & SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC 0.00 10042848 17121 0.00 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 0.00 59408 SUPPLIES 120.00 0.00 120.00 10042128 8852 12.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 32.00 100095 BATTERY 20.00 72.00 CHECK NO 559198 VENDOR 261550 - ELIZABETH MINDOR 272.00 10043213 9/21/01 1.OHR MINDOR 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 13.34 9/21/01 1.OHR MINDOR 80.44 109.20 10043213 9/19/01 7.5HRS MINDOR 681 - 431590. 634402 -00000 0.00 9/19/01 7.5HRS MINDOR 10043213 9/19/01 3.75HRS MINDOR 681. 421190- 634402 -00000 0.00 9/19/01 3.75HRS MINDOR 10043213 9/21/01 2.OHRS MINDOR 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 9/21/01 2.OHRS MINDOR 10043213 9/20/01 1.25HRS MINDOR 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 9/20/01 1.25HRS MINDOR 10043213 9/20/01 4.5HRS MINDOR 681 - 431590 - 634402.00000 0.00 9/20/01 4.5HRS MINDOR CHECK NO 559251 VENDOR 288340 - ELIZABETH NAGENGAST 10041568 6/29 -8/23 TVL E.NAGENGAST 001 - 156110 - 640300 -00000 0.00 6/29 -8/23 TRAVEL E. NAGENGAST 10041568 7/31.9/21 TVL E.NAGENGAST 001 - 156110- 640200 -00000 0.00 7/31,9/21 TRAVEL E. NAGENGAST CHECK NO 558978 VENDOR 114800 - ELLIS K. PHELPS & COMPANY 10043404 050656A 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 100936 WEMCO PUMP PARTS 16JI PAGE 44 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 300.62 0.00 300.62 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 300.62 225.00 0.00 225.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 285.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 120.00 0.00 120.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 272.00 67.10 0.00 67.10 13.34 0.00 13.34 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 80.44 109.20 0.00 109.20 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 45 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 109.20 CHECK NO 559090 VENDOR 190020 - ELSIE GONZALEZ 10043212 9/21/01 2.5HRS GONZALEZ 681 - 431590. 634402 -00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 9/21/01 2.5HRS GONZALEZ 10043212 9/25/01 5.5HRS GONZALEZ 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 88.00 0.00 88.00 9/25/01 5.5HRS GONZALEZ 10043212 9/24/01 7.5HRS GONZALEZ 681 - 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 120.00 0.00 120.00 9/24/01 7.5HRS GONZALEZ 10043212 9/11/01 1.5HRS GONZALEZ 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 9/11/01 1.5HRS GONZALEZ 10043212 9/20/01 4.5HRS GONZALEZ 681- 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 9/20/01 4.5HRS GONZALEZ 10043212 9/20/01 2.OHRS GONZALEZ 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 9/20/01 2.OHRS GONZALEZ 10043212 9/11/01 2.5HRS GONZALEZ 681. 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 9/11/01 2.5HRS GONZALEZ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 416.00 CHECK NO 559329 VENDOR 324180 - EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS 10041093 INV225652 490 - 144610- 652720 -00000 0.00 904.00 0.00 904.00 107019 MEDICAL PRODUCTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 904.00 CHECK NO 559122 VENDOR 222570 ENDLESS SUMMER 20000026 R O'BRIEN 10 /01 RENT 001 - 155930 - 634153 -00000 0.00 350.00 0.00 350.00 R. O'BRIEN 10 /01 RENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 350.00 CHECK NO 559032 VENDOR 150820 ENTERPRISE RENT -A -CAR 10042422 DX3514071 119 - 156342. 634999 -00000 0.00 349.14 0.00 349.14 59336 - VAN REPAIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 349.14 CHECK NO 559135 VENDOR 232360 ENVIRONMENTAL EXPRESS, LTD. OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 46 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042253 1000029721 114. 178975 - 764990 -00000 0.00 4,821.92 0.00 4,821.92 107141 HOTBLOCK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,821.92 CHECK NO 559491 VENDOR 900080 - ETHEL E HORSTE 212752 AMB REF HORSTE 6/7/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 56.29 0.00 56.29 AMB REF HORSTE 0124642 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 56.29 CHECK NO 559022 VENDOR 144470 - EUGENE T. FINAN, M.D. 10042911 A,DIEUSEUL 1 /00 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 689.65 0.00 689.65 107839 MEDICAL SERVICES 10042911 A,DIEUSEUL 4 -5 -6/00 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 645.45 0.00 645.45 107839 MEDICAL SERVICES 10042911 A,DIEUSEUL 04/00 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 659.10 0.00 659.10 107839 MEDICAL SERVICES 10042911 A,DIEUSEUL 3/00 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 659.10 0.00 659.10 107839 MEDICAL SERVICES 10042911 A,DIEUSEUL 2100 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 659.10 0.00 659.10 107839 MEDICAL SERVICES 10042911 A,DIEUSEUL 12100 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 591.50 0.00 591.50 107839 MEDICAL SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,903.90 CHECK NO 558887 VENDOR 6120 EVANS OIL COMPANY 10042122 214358 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 882.61 0.00 882.61 100906 SUPPLY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 882.61 CHECK NO 559070 VENDOR 173160 EVERETT H. ALSBROOK JR. M.D., P.A. 10043187 10/2 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 121.55 0.00 121.55 59373 L KODAK8/29/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 121.55 CHECK NO 559118 VENDOR 214900 F.P.L. OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10043019 53212 -55092 8/24 - 9/25/01 53212 -55092 8/24- 9/25/01 10042589 28385 -65485 8/20- 9/19/01 28385 -65485 8/20- 9/19/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101 - 163630. 643100 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211 - 643100 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559184 VENDOR 256660 - FDLE /USER SERVICES BUREAU 10042709 T.RIVERA BACKGROUND CHECK 111 - 156381 - 634999 -00000 059335 T.RIVERA BACKGROUND CHECK CHECK NO 558888 VENDOR 6250 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 10042213 5- 944 -19170 408 - 210105 - 641950 -00000 0.00 100238 SHIPPING 0.00 10042215 5- 931 -39804 001- 122310 - 641950.00000 0.00 100138 SHIPPING 0.00 10042215 5- 931 -67154 001. 122310- 641950 -00000 0.00 100138 SHIPPING 0.00 10042233 5- 940.81919 001 - 144510 - 641950 -00000 0.00 059145 SHIPPING 0.00 10042579 5- 940 -25883 001- 144510. 641950 -00000 0.00 059347 SHIPPING 10043210 5- 933 -65868 681. 421510 - 641950 -00000 0.00 100759 SHIPPING 0.00 10042650 5- 913 -53889 001 - 010510 - 641950.00000 0.00 059285 SHIPPING 10042653 5- 913 -81786 001 - 010510. 641950 -00000 059318 SHIPPING CHECK NO 559069 VENDOR 172870 . FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 10042210 5- 931 -41471 408 - 210120- 641950 -00000 101591 SHIPPING 10042578 5- 919 -74990 001 - 138710. 641950 -00000 100406 SHIPPING 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 15,294.16 0.00 75,822.19 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 32.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 PAGE 47 VCHR NET 15,294.16 75.822.19 91,116.35 32.00 32.00 0.00 12.80 0.00 12.80 0.00 15.10 0.00 15.10 0.00 12.95 0.00 12.95 0.00 124.80 0.00 124.80 0.00 9.90 0.00 9.90 0.00 22.05 0.00 22.05 0.00 30.25 0.00 30.25 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 245.85 0.00 12.55 0.00 12.55 0.00 8.65 0.00 8.65 0 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042212 5- 929 -66740 100449 SHIPPING 10042581 5- 871 -94016 101201 SHIPPING 10042209 5. 943 -06372 100494 SHIPPING 10042214 5- 958 -17974 106979 SHIPPING 10042581 5- 891 -84043 101201 SHIPPING 10042211 5. 913 -83172 101269 SHIPPING 10042703 5- 952 -19461 101276 SHIPPING 10042209 5- 942 -48302 100494 SHIPPING 10042580 5- 905 -89351 101276 SHIPPING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VENDOR 105760 - SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111 - 138317 - 641950 -00000 0.00 001 - 000000. 142900 -00000 0.00 114 - 178975 - 641950 -00000 0.00 123 - 155975 - 641950 -33075 0.00 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 470 - 173410 - 641950 -00000 0.00 111- 156310 - 641950.00000 0.00 111 - 156313 - 641950.00000 0.00 111 - 156341 - 641950 -00000 0.00 111 - 156349 - 641950 -00000 0.00 130 - 157710 - 641950 -00000 0.00 119 - 156342 - 641950 -00000 0.00 114 - 178975 - 641950 -00000 0.00 111 - 156310 - 641950 -00000 0.00 111 - 156313 - 641950 -00000 0.00 111. 156341 - 641950 -00000 0.00 111. 156349 - 641950 -00000 0.00 130 - 157710. 641950 -00000 0.00 119 - 156342 - 641950.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558964 VENDOR 105760 - FERGUSON UNDERGROUND 10042086 824526 8.50 414. 263611 - 655100 -74023 52.50 106387 FIRE HYDRANTS 0.00 10042588 822657 408 - 253212 - 655100.00000 100215 BACKFLOW PARTS 10042208 829796 408 - 233352. 652910 -00000 101826 PARTS /SUPPLIES 16JI AMT NET VCHR DISC 9.15 0.00 100.00 0.00 9.05 0.00 8.50 0.00 52.50 0.00 9.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.35 0.00 0.00 53.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 48 VCHR NET 9.15 100.00 9.05 8.50 52.50 9.65 15.90 6.35 53.40 285.70 0.00 11,574.00 0.00 11,574.00 0.00 15.178.00 0.00 15,178.00 0.00 182.59 0.00 182.59 0 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6J 1 PAGE 49 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042204 829537 408 - 210130 - 655200 -00000 0.00 898.00 0.00 898.00 101420 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10042715 826168 412 - 273511 - 655100 -70057 0.00 95.57 0.00 95.57 058474 FILLER FLANGES 10042204 827732 408 - 210130 - 655200 -00000 0.00 798.15 0.00 798.15 101420 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10042086 824526.1 414 - 263611 - 655100.74023 0.00 3,926.00 0.00 3,926.00 106387 FIRE HYDRANTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 32,652.31 CHECK NO 559187 VENDOR 257370 - FERGUSON UNDERGROUND INC. #125 10042704 828053 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 547.74 0.00 547.74 100752 PARTS 10042704 828020 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 194.46 0.00 194.46 100752 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 742.20 CHECK NO 559413 VENDOR 343520 - FGCA 10043140 J.MERRITT RENEWAL 01 -02 001. 100130 - 654210 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 059393 J.MERRITT RENEWAL 01 -02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 559117 VENDOR 214800 - FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC 10042592 16210 001 - 122240. 646281 -00000 0.00 240.00 0.00 240.00 107789 FIRE ALARM SYS.MAINT /REPAIR 10042592 16247 001. 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 161.00 0.00 161.00 107789 FIRE ALARM SYS.MAINT /REPAIR 10042718 16057 001 - 122240 - 646281.00000 0.00 4,384.80 0.00 4,384.80 107748 7/01 FIRE SPRINKLER INSPECT. 10042592 16246 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 107789 FIRE ALARM SYS.MAINT /REPAIR 10042592 16171 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 550.00 0.00 550.00 107789 FIRE ALARM SYS.MAINT /REPAIR 10042592 16172 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 180.00 0.00 180.00 107789 FIRE ALARM SYS.MAINT /REPAIR 0 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10042655 16169 001 - 122240 - 646281.00000 0.00 104572 FIRE SPRINKLER REPAIRS 10042592 16221 001- 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 107789 FIRE ALARM SYS.MAINT /REPAIR 10042592 16094 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 107789 FIRE ALARM SYS.MAINT /REPAIR 10042592 16193 001- 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 107789 FIRE ALARM SYS.MAINT /REPAIR 10042592 16222 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 107789 FIRE ALARM SYS.MAINT /REPAIR CHECK NO 559230 VENDOR 280030 - FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTION 10042249 10471561 313 - 163611 - 634999.00000 0.00 313 - 163611 - 641950 -00000 0.00 101 - 163612 - 634999 -00000 0.00 101 - 163612 - 641950 -00000 0.00 106647 COLLIER FL AERIAL MAP BK. CHECK NO 559492 VENDOR 900080 - FLORIDA 1ST (DSBCC) 212742 AMB.REF.MCNALLY 3/15/01 490- 000000. 116004 -00000 AMB.REF.MCNALLY 0116471 -1 212741 AMB.REF.EDMONDS 6/6/01 490. 000000 - 116004 -00000 AMB.REF.EDMONDS 0124504 -1 CHECK NO 559087 VENDOR 187250 - FLORIDA BAR ASSOCIATION 10043294 DUES /SECTION MEM /BELPEDIO 001 - 010510 - 654210 -00000 059445 DUES /SECTION MEM /BELPEDIO CHECK NO 559143 VENDOR 238130 - FLORIDA COMFORT SYSTEMS 10042664 4481116 -R 191 - 138785 - 884200 -33751 35759000009 L SMITH 107744 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 400.00 0.00 150.00 0.00 446.75 0.00 397.93 0.00 180.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 575.00 17.40 571.85 17.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 50 VCHR NET 400.00 150.00 446.75 397.93 180.00 7,180.48 1.181.75 1,181.75 0.00 266.00 0.00 266.00 0.00 202.30 0.00 202.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 468.30 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 0.00 2.386.00 0.00 2,386.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.386.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 559115 VENDOR 214550 - FLORIDA DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 10042575 WPI #1612071 313 - 000000 - 202000 -00000 0.00 WPI #1612071 CHECK NO 558889 VENDOR 6670 - FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY 10042708 S.CHRZANOWSKI 10/01 -9/02 113 - 138312 - 654210 -00000 059360 S.CHRZANOWSKI 10/01.9/02 CHECK NO 559126 VENDOR 227700 - FLORIDA HERITAGE MAGAZINE 10042232 1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTION 198 - 157410 - 654110.00000 059245 1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTION CHECK NO 559264 VENDOR 294600 - FLORIDA IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC 10043215 378564 CHECK TOTAL 408. 253212 - 655100 -00000 283.00 107826 SPRINKLER EQUIP. /SUPPLIES 0.00 10042654 378565 CHECK TOTAL 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 19.95 101388 IRRIGATION PARTS /DISCOUNT 0.00 10043215 370596 45.09 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 45.09 107826 DISCOUNT 0.00 10043215 378564 0.21- 408- 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.21- 107826 DISCOUNT 0.00 10043214 376040 13.88 111 - 156332. 646311 -00000 13.88 100589 SPRINKLER PARTS /DISCOUNT 0.00 10043215 377960 2.83- 408. 253212- 655100 -00000 2.83- 107826 SPRINKLER EQUIP. /SUPPLIES 0.00 10043215 376039 408 - 253212 - 655100.00000 107826 DISCOUNT 10042707 377959 408. 233352. 646311 -00000 102583 SPRINKLER PARTS /DISCOUNT 10043215 376039 408 - 253212. 655100 -00000 107826 SPRINKLER EQUIP. /SUPPLIES 16JI PAGE 51 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 11,543.45 0.00 11,543.45 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11,543.45 0.00 283.00 0.00 283.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 283.00 0.00 19.95 0.00 19.95 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 19.95 0.00 10.32 0.00 10.32 0.00 45.09 0.00 45.09 0.00 0.92- 0.00 0.92- 0.00 0.21- 0.00 0.21- 0.00 214.90 0.00 214.90 0.00 13.88 0.00 13.88 0.00 1.01- 0.00 1.01- 0.00 2.83- 0.00 2.83- 0.00 50.55 0.00 50.55 OCTOBER 02, 2001 0.00 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 0.00 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 181.20 0.00 574.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 0.00 3.62- 0.00 FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10043215 377960 141.32 408 - 253212. 655100 -00000 0.00 0.00 107826 DISCOUNT 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10043215 370596 408. 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 107826 SPRINKLER EQUIP. /SUPPLIES 10043211 382200 109 - 182901 - 646311 -00000 0.00 100167 SPRINKLER PARTS 10043215 377958 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 107826 SPRINKLER EQUIP. /SUPPLIES 10043215 370595 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 107826 SPRINKLER EQUIP. /SUPPLIES 10043215 376785 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 107826 SPRINKLER EQUIP. /SUPPLIES 10043214 376040 111 - 156332 - 646311.00000 0.00 100589 SPRINKLER PARTS /DISCOUNT 10043215 370595 408. 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 107826 DISCOUNT 10042654 378565 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 0.00 101388 IRRIGATION PARTS /DISCOUNT 10043211 382200 109 - 182901. 646311 -00000 0.00 100167 DISCOUNT 10043215 377958 408. 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 107826 DISCOUNT 10042654 377961 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 0.00 101388 IRRIGATION PARTS /DISCOUNT 10042707 377959 408 - 233352 - 646311.00000 0.00 102583 SPRINKLER PARTS /DISCOUNT 10042654 377961 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 0.00 101388 IRRIGATION PARTS /DISCOUNT 10043215 376785 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 107826 DISCOUNT CHECK NO 558857 VENDOR 204830 - FLORIDA MEDICAID /COUNTY BILLING 10043377 RB 0108 P0102117 001 - 155930 - 634106 -00000 AND 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 0.28- 0.00 45.95 0.00 244.79 0.00 41.36 0.00 181.20 0.00 574.00 0.00 4.30- 0.00 3.62- 0.00 0.90- 0.00 4.90- 0.00 0.83- 0.00 1.21- 0.00 141.32 0.00 60.72 0.00 11.48- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 52 VCHR NET 0.28- 45.95 244.79 41.36 181.20 574.00 4.30 - 3.62 - 0.90 - 4.90 - 0.83 - 1.21- 141.32 60.72 11.48- 1,591.59 0.00 34,215.55 0.00 34,215.55 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558858 VENDOR 204830 - FLORIDA MEDICAID /COUNTY BILLING 10043378 CB 0108 P0102069 001 - 155930 - 634107 -00000 0.00 AND CHECK NO 558859 VENDOR 204830 - FLORIDA MEDICAID /COUNTY BILLING 10043379 CB 0108 P0102117 001 - 155930 - 634106.00000 0.00 AND CHECK NO 558856 VENDOR 204830 - FLORIDA MEDICAID /COUNTY BILLING 10043206 RB 0108 P0102069 001 - 155930 - 634107 -00000 0.00 AND CHECK NO 558893 VENDOR 6790 - FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CHECK TOTAL 10043205 87091 -34053 8/21- 9/20/01 490 - 144610 - 643100 -00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17,545.00 001 - 061010 - 643100 -00000 0.00 52,564.43 87091 -34053 8/21- 9/20/01 52,564.43 1,650.00 10043205 89618 -38201 8/29- 9/28/01 001 - 156180 - 643100 -00000 0.00 265.01 89618.38201 8/29- 9/28/01 290.26 0.00 10042694 22122 -81469 8/23 - 9/24/01 001 - 155410.- 643100 - 00000• 0.00 0.00 22122 -81469 8/23- 9/24/01 0.00 960.23 10042572 99914 -46015 8/22- 9/21/01 001 - 156170 - 643100 -00000 0.00 338.31 99914 -46015 8/22- 9/21/01 9.09 10.54 10043133 85942 -34000 8/22 - 9/21/01 770 - 162710- 643100 -00000 0.00 85942 -34000 8/22- 9/21/01 10043205 35318 -65347 8/22- 9/21/01 490 - 144610 - 643100 -00000 0.00 35318 -65347 8/22. 9/21/01 10042694 92617 -71175 8/24 - 9/25/01 160 - 162518- 643100 -00000 0.00 92617 -71175 8/24- 9/25/01 10042572 60927 -43068 8/22- 9/21/01 150 - 162545 - 643100.00000 0.00 60927 -43068 8/22- 9/21/01 16JI PAGE 53 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 34,215.55 17,545.00 0.00 17,545.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17,545.00 52,564.43 0.00 52,564.43 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52,564.43 1,650.00 0.00 1,650.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,650.00 265.01 290.26 0.00 555.27 1.027.18 0.00 1,027.18 4,790.12 0.00 4,790.12 960.23 0.00 960.23 960.25 0.00 960.25 338.31 0.00 338.31 9.09 0.00 9.09 10.54 0.00 10.54 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 54 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042572 42477 -61549 8/22- 9/21/01 111 - 163646 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 42477.61549 8/22- 9/21/01 10042572 77760 -35086 8/21- 9/20/01 152. 162541 - 643100 -00000 0.00 18.87 0.00 18.87 77760 -35086 8/21- 9/20/01 10043133 03801 -54062 8/22- 9/21/01 150 - 162545 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.62 0.00 9.62 03801 -54062 8/22 - 9/21/01 10043205 75152 -48438 7/12- 8/22/01 408 - 233351. 643100 -00000 0.00 33.87 0.00 33.87 75152 -48438 7/12 - 8/22/01 10043205 80381 -36118 8/22- 9/21/01 001 - 061010 - 643100 -00000 0.00 181.07 490 - 144610 - 643100 -00000 0.00 120.71 0.00 301.78 80381 -36118 8/22. 9/21/01 10043205 75264 -82588 8/29- 9/28/01 408 - 233313 - 643100 -00000 0.00 10.45 0.00 10.45 75264.82588 8/29- 9/28/01 10043205 52568 -34341 8/21. 9/20/01 490 - 144610 - 643100 -00000 0.00 545.91 0.00 545.91 52568 -34341 8/21- 9/20/01 10042694 32053 -34091 8/24- 9/25/01 001 - 155410 - 643100 -00000 0.00 37.11 0.00 37.11 32053 -34091 8/24 - 9/25/01 10042572 75532.38077 8/22- 9/21/01 778 - 182701 - 643100 -00000 0.00 1,030.34 0.00 1.030.34 75532 -38077 8/22- 9/21/01 10043133 67247 -36027 8/24 - 9/25/01 111 - 156332 - 643100 -00000 0.00 1,215.68 0.00 1.215.68 67247 -36027 8/24- 9/25/01 10042572 26881.33004 8/22- 9/21/01 109 - 182901 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 26881 -33004 8/22 - 9/21/01 10043133 88172 -16313 8/24- 9/25/01 111 - 156313 - 643100.00000 0.00 4,981.87 0.00 4,981.87 88172 -16313 8/24 - 9/25/01 10042694 22502 -32044 8/24- 9/25/01 001 - 155410 - 643100 -00000 0.00 1,007.71 0.00 1,007.71 22502 -32044 8/24. 9/25/01 10042572 76800 -30082 8/22 - 9/21/01 109 - 182901 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 76800 -30082 8/22 - 9/21/01 10042572 05453 -33056 8/22. 9/21/01 778 - 182701- 643100 -00000 0.00 556.51 0.00 556.51 05453 -33056 8/22- 9/21/01 10043205 11784 -34336 8/27- 9/26/01 408 - 253221 - 643100 -00000 0.00 35.73 0.00 35.73 11784 -34336 8/27- 9/26/01 10043317 33496.39108 8/16 - 9/17/01 144 - 144360 - 643100 -00000 0.00 519.92 0.00 519.92 33496 -39108 8/16- 9/17/01 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 55 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042694 97229 -32085 8/22- 9/21/01 001 - 157110. 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 97229 -32085 8/22- 9/21/01 10042572 75552 -32029 8/22- 9/21/01 778 - 182701 - 643100 -00000 0.00 47.26 0.00 47.26 75552 -32029 8/22- 9/21/01 10043133 05233 -32088 8/22 - 9/21/01 760 - 162711. 643100 -00000 0.00 193.81 0.00 193.81 05233 -32088 8/22- 9/21/01 10042572 24493 -33059 8/21- 9/20/01 109 - 182901 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 24493 -33059 8/21- 9/20/01 10043133 11744 -78113 8/22. 9/21/01 160 - 162518 - 643100 -00000 0.00 19.81 0.00 19.81 11744 -78113 8/22 - 9/21/01 10043205 87091 -34053 8/21- 9/20/01 001 - 000000- 115400 -00000 0.00 706.70 0.00 706.70 87091 -34053 8/21- 9/20/01 10042572 29323 -04062 8/22. 9/21/01 150 - 162545 - 643100.00000 0.00 9.62 0.00 9.62 29323 -04062 8/22- 9/21/01 10042572 87251 -32073 8/21- 9/20/01 001 - 156140- 643100 -00000 0.00 1,109.13 0.00 1.109.13 87251 -32073 8/21- 9/20/01 10042572 90299 -32127 8/20- 9/19/01 408 - 233312. 643100 -00000 0.00 28,432.07 0.00 28,432.07 90299 -32127 8/20 - 9/19/01 10043133 95132 -36068 8/22- 9/21/01 101. 163630- 643100 -00000 0.00 10,577.39 0.00 10,577.39 95132 -36068 8/22- 9/21/01 10042572 19681 -76089 8/22- 9/21/01 109 - 182901 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.25 0.00 9.25 19681.76089 8/22- 9/21/01 10042572 75562 -30055 8/22- 9/21/01 778. 182701 - 643100 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 75562 -30055 8/22- 9/21/01 10042572 68644 -35182 8/22- 9/21/01 109 - 182901 - 643100.00000 0.00 57.65 0.00 57.65 68644 -35182 8/22- 9/21/01 10042572 80138 -36302 8/21- 9/20/01 130 - 157710. 643100 -00000 0.00 3,699.30 0.00 3,699.30 80138 -36302 8/21- 9/20/01 10043133 19773 -44306 8/22- 9/21/01 111 - 156332 - 643100 -00000 0.00 46.51 0.00 46.51 19773 -44306 8/22- 9/21/01 10042694 72478 -62076 8/23. 9/24/01 188 - 140480. 643100 -00000 0.00 759.10 0.00 759.10 72478 -62076 8/23- 9/24/01 10043133 74697 -39044 8/23- 9/24/01 001 - 172930 - 643100 -00000 0.00 61.68 0.00 61.68 74697 -39044 8/23- 9/24/01 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043205 75152 -48438 8/22 - 9/21/01 408. 233351- 643100 -00000 0.00 16.82 0.00 75152 -48438 8/22- 9/21/01 10043205 81290 -37431 7/24- 9/12/01 408- 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 65.24 0.00 81290 -37431 7/24- 9/12/01 10043205 06515 -54057 8/22- 9/21/01 490 - 144610. 643100 -00000 0.00 295.22 001 - 061010. 643100 -00000 0.00 442.83 0.00 06515 -54057 8/22. 9/21/01 10043205 83557 -30154 8/24- 9/25/01 408 - 253212 - 643100 -00000 0.00 24.38 0.00 83557 -30154 8/24- 9/25/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559283 VENDOR 305020 FLORIDA RESEARCH, INC 10040157 93667 470 - 173410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 59.00 0.00 101327 - NEWSLETTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558975 VENDOR 112450 FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES 10042206 1140011095 111. 163645 - 653110 -00000 0.00 246.62 0.00 100813 LIMEROCK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558894 VENDOR 6910 FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES, INC. 10042248 1140010755 001 - 172930. 653110 -00000 0.00 61.50 0.00 056284 3 " -8" RIP RAP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559212 VENDOR 267420 - FLORIDA ROOFING. SHEET METAL & AIR 10042651 MEM.FEE 15608 J.BALLARD 113 - 138915 - 654210.00000 0.00 120.00 059316 MEM.FEE 15608 J.BALLARD CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 559015 VENDOR 135230 - FLORIDA STATE UNDERGROUND, INC 10043001 #2 (RETAINAGE) 346 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 13,303.94- 106251 7/26/01 THRU 8/25/01 10043001 #2 346 - 116360 - 763400 -80013 0.00 133,039.37 106251 7/26/01 THRU 8/25/01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 56 VCHR NET 16.82 65.24 738.05 24.38 65.638.58 59.00 59.00 246.62 246.62 61.50 61.50 120.00 120.00 13,303.94- 133,039.37 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 57 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 119,735.43 CHECK NO 559312 VENDOR 318590 - FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC 10042711 PINV0009517 521. 122410- 641950 -00000 0.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 059394 SHIPPING 10042711 PINV0009591 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 21.11 0.00 21.11 059394 LAMP, DOME 10042711 PINV0009517 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 163.20 0.00 163.20 059394 COVER,SEAT BACK /CUSHION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 191.31 CHECK NO 558895 VENDOR 6940 - FLORIDA TREND 10043139 SUBSCRIPTION /PUBLIC INFO. 001 - 100130 - 654110 -00000 0.00 19.95 0.00 19.95 059395 SUBSCRIPTION /PUBLIC INFO. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 19.95 CHECK NO 559153 VENDOR 243280 - FLORIDA WATER SERVICES 10042716 009723515 -4 8/16- 9/17/01 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 355.55 0.00 355.55 009723515 -4 8/16- 9/17/01 10043296 009727305 -6 8/8- 9/7/01 470 - 173442 - 643400 -00000 0.00 178.70 0.00 178.70 009727305 -6 8/8- 9/7/01 10042702 001612805 -0 8/10- 9/6/01 495. 192370- 643400 -00000 0.00 175.05 0.00 175.05 101965 001612805 -0 8/10- 9/6/01 10042716 009738135 -4 8/20- 9/20/01 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 455.69 0.00 455.69 009738135 -4 8/20- 9/20/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,164.99 CHECK NO 559388 VENDOR 340300 - FORESTRY SUPPLIERS, INC. 10041767 301453 -00 001- 178985 - 651110 -00000 0.00 121.49 001 - 178985 - 641950 -00000 0.00 16.42 0.00 137.91 058751 OFFICE SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 137.91 CHECK NO 559369 VENDOR 336540 - FORT DODGE ANIMAL HEALTH 10041765 715054 001 - 155410 - 652710.00000 0.00 97.20 0.00 97.20 059074 TELAZOL OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J1 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041766 715025 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 54.00 0.00 058972 KETASET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559166 VENDOR 252050 - FPL 10042699 475226 111 - 156332 - 652991.00000 0.00 476.00 0.00 057140 METER FOR SR951 BOAT RAMP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559493 VENDOR 900080 - FRANCES I. FLOYD 212739 AMB.REF.FLOYD 6/25/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 59.81 0.00 AMB.REF.FLOYD 0126077 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559462 VENDOR 900050 - FRANK DISILVIO 212732 REFUND PARKS F.DISILVIO 111 - 000000 - 208901 -00000 0.00 4.20 0.00 F.DISILVIO REFUND PARKS 212731 REFUND PARKS F.DISILVIO 111 - 156313 - 347909 -00000 0.00 70.00 0.00 F.DISILVIO REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559494 VENDOR 900080 - FREDERIC M. MEAD 212740 AMB.REF.MEAD 5/4/01 490 - 000000. 116004 -00000 0.00 47.85 0.00 AMB.REF.MEAD 0121643 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559037 VENDOR 157320 - FREEMAN AND FREEMAN INC. 10042660 #22 191 - 138785 - 884200.33751 0.00 12.000.00 0.00 00117040005 V PRESTON 107698 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559255 VENDOR 290310 - FREIGHTLINER OF TAMPA 10042712 104350P 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 79.10 0.00 059396 PARTS 10042712 104676P 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 56.54 0.00 059396 PARTS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559438 VENDOR 344360 - FSI CLEAN AIR 10043384 7/25 -9/22 TRVL D MCMAHON 001 - 156160 - 640200 -00000 0.00 200.97 0.00 7/25 -9/22 TRVL D MCMAHON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559278 VENDOR 301510 - G GEDNEY GODWIN INC 10041768 044501 198 - 157410- 652990 -00000 0.00 232.95 0.00 058791 DRESS FOR OLD FL FESTIVAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559365 VENDOR 333980 - G &K SERVICES 10042612 601993 408 - 233312 - 652130.00000 0.00 121.10 0.00 106418 UNIFORMS 10042608 601983 001 - 156363 - 652130 -00000 0.00 45.93 0.00 106465 UNIFORMS 10042615 601992 408 - 233313 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.60 0.00 106355 UNIFORMS 9/3 10042605 597905 408- 233350 - 652130 -00000 0.00 29.40 0.00 106348 UNIFORMS 10042608 601977 111 - 156332. 652130 -00000 0.00 47.63 0.00 106465 UNIFORMS 10042608 602713 111. 156334- 652130 -00000 0.00 26.38 0.00 106465 UNIFORMS 10042609 927219 (CREDIT) 001 - 122240 - 652130.00000 0.00 20.00• 0.00 106526 CREDIT /UNIFORMS 10042605 601981 408 - 233350 - 652130 -00000 0.00 29.40 0.00 106348 UNIFORMS 10042618 601984 408- 253212 - 652130 -00000 0.00 248.75 0.00 106333 UNIFORMS 10042613 601990 408 - 210130. 652130 -00000 0.00 307.44 0.00 106366 UNIFORMS 10042608 605169 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 106465 UNIFORMS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 60 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042607 601979 001. 172930 - 652130 -00000 0.00 64.09 0.00 64.09 107034 UNIFORMS 10042609 601986 001 - 122240 - 652130.00000 0.00 106.22 0.00 106.22 106526 CREDIT /UNIFORMS 10042619 605138 470 - 173441. 652130 -00000 0.00 34.65 0.00 34.65 106675 UNIFORMS 10042613 606059 408 - 210130 - 652130 -00000 0.00 301.74 0.00 301.74 106366 UNIFORMS 10042617 601989 101 - 163630 - 652130 -00000 0.00 61.22 0.00 61.22 104974 UNIFORMS 10042619 602741 470 - 173442- 652130 -00000 0.00 20.99 0.00 20.99 106675 UNIFORMS 10042614 601988 101 - 163646 - 652130 -00000 0.00 35.17 0.00 35.17 106335 UNIFORMS 9/3 10042620 601982 111.156381- 652130 -00000 0.00 4.03 0.00 4.03 106955 UNIFORM /MOPS 10042613 610119 408 - 210130 - 652130 -00000 0.00 301.74 0.00 301.74 106366 UNIFORMS 10042616 601973 408 - 253211. 652130 -00000 0.00 134.91 0.00 134.91 106359 UNIFORMS 9/3 10042608 597918 111. 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 30.41 0.00 30.41 106465 UNIFORMS 10042611 605161 408 - 253221 - 652130.00000 0.00 73.31 0.00 73.31 106402 UNIFORMS 10042608 605166 111.156332- 652130 -00000 0.00 20.15 0.00 20.15 106465 UNIFORMS 10042608 601972 111 - 156332 - 652130.00000 0.00 27.40 0.00 27.40 106465 UNIFORMS 10042607 606048 001 - 172930. 652130 -00000 0.00 64.09 0.00 64.09 107034 UNIFORMS 10042610 601980 408 - 233352 - 652130 -00000 0.00 122.61 0.00 122.61 106368 UNIFORMS 10042603 601974 001 - 155410. 652130 -00000 0.00 21.75 0.00 21.75 106300 UNIFORMS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 61 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042620 601982 111 - 156381 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.92 0.00 1.92 106955 - UNIFORM /MOPS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,295.15 CHECK NO 559380 VENDOR 339190 - G &K SERVICES 10042186 589728 521.122410- 652130 -00000 0.00 122.61 0.00 122.61 106407 UNIFORMS, 8/13 10042604 601991 109- 182901 - 652130.00000 0.00 42.30 0.00 42.30 106430 UNIFORMS 10042186 593827 521 - 122410. 652130 -00000 0.00 117.39 0.00 117.39 106407 UNIFORMS, 8/20 10042606 602714 101 - 163620 - 652130 -00000 0.00 79.53 0.00 79.53 106566 UNIFORMS 10042604 601991 109 - 182901 - 652990.00000 0.00 1.95 0.00 1.95 106430 UNIFORMS 10042186 597900 521 - 122410 - 652130 -00000 0.00 127.39 0.00 127.39 106407 UNIFORMS, 8/27 10042604 601991 109 - 182602 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 16.12 106430 UNIFORMS 10042606 601975 101 - 163620 - 652130 -00000 0.00 256.83 0.00 256.83 106566 UNIFORMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 764.12 CHECK NO 559463 VENDOR 900050 - G.L.HOMES OF NAPLES ASSOCIATES, LTD. 212733 REFUND 288967 G.L.HOMES 113. 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 162.75 0.00 162.75 G.L.HOMES REFUND 288967 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 162.75 CHECK NO 558896 VENDOR 7400 - GALE RESEARCH COMPANY 10042861 11007850 001 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 371.71 307 - 156110 - 766100.00000 0:00 14.90 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 94.12 0.00 480.73 059341 BOOKS 10042235 SO 9595742 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 175.00 0.00 175.00 059165 AM- SALARIES & WAGES SURVEY 6 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10042234 10985944 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 059150 CONT.AUTHORS NEW REVISION 10041475 10979276 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 107585 BOOKS 10041475 10977324 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 107585 BOOKS 10041763 10980814 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 059007 BOOKS CHECK NO 559495 VENDOR 900080 - GILES F. BUSH 0.00 212738 AMB.REF.BUSH 12112100 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 0.00 AMB.REF.BUSH 0106509 -1 0.00 220.40 CHECK NO 559240 VENDOR 283160 - GLOBE TICKET & LABEL 0.00 10042576 142809 0.00 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 0.00 057795 ID WRISTBANDS /POOL PATRONS CHECK NO 558897 VENDOR 7770 - GOLDEN GATE NURSERY 10042714 71891 408 - 233351 - 646314 -00000 0.00 059351 SUPPLIES 10041759 71929 111- 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 100814 TURF 10041760 71947 408 - 253212. 646314 -00000 0.00 100920 TURF 10041760 71951 408 - 253212 - 646314 -00000 0.00 100920 TURF 10041760 71976 408 - 253212 - 646314 -00000 0.00 100920 TURF 10041761 71933 001. 155410. 652210 -00000 0.00 101556 HAY 16JI PAGE 62 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 152.00 0.00 152.00 132.53 0.00 132.53 551.10 0.00 551.10 220.40 0.00 220.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,711.76 335.00 0.00 335.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 335.00 435.51 0.00 435.51 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 435.51 374.94 0.00 374.94 45.00 0.00 45.00 21.25 0.00 21.25 50.00 0.00 50.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 721.19 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559428 VENDOR 344110 - GOLDEN GATE PHYSICAL THERAPY 10043138 P.GONZALEZ 8/24,27,29/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 152.75 0.00 059442 P.GONZALEZ 8/24,27,29/01 10043138 P.GONZALEZ 8/22 -23/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 143.00 0.00 059442 P.GONZALEZ 8/22 -23/01 10043138 P.GONZALEZ 9/5/01 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 52.00 0.00 059442 P.GONZALEZ 9/5/01 10043138 P.GONZALEZ 8/29,31 &9/4/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 139.75 0.00 059442 P.GONZALEZ 8/29,31 &9/4/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559067 VENDOR 171810 - GOLDEN GATE POOL SUPPLIES INC. 10043207 14050 111 - 156313 - 652311 -00000 0.00 262.50 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 101240 CHEMICALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558977 VENDOR 114580 - GOLF AND ELECTRIC CARRIAGES, INC. 10042574 51912 -IN 368. 116360 - 764990 -00165 0.00 0.00 368. 116360 - 764110 -00165 0.00 2,895.00 0.00 106977 1996 CLUB CAR GOLF CART CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559082 VENDOR 182590 - GOLF VENTURES 10042590 621231 111. 156334. 764990 -00000 0.00 8,895.80 0.00 107037 TURF JR. TRUCKSTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559421 VENDOR 343860 - GOOD HOUSEKEEPING 10042236 0905085/1 111 - 156395 - 654110 -00000 0.00 19.97 0.00 055328 MAGAZ.SUBSC. /NW.FITNESS CNTR. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559077 VENDOR 178630 - GRAINGER 10042244 931 - 987649.7 408 - 253212 - 655100.00000 0.00 117.36 0.00 100287 SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 172.07 0.00 423.73 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 0.00 146.14 FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10042246 973 - 728116 -3 408 - 210130 - 652910 -00000 0.00 0.00 101453 SUPPLIES 10042247 834 - 606282 -4 111. 156313 - 652910 -00000 0.00 107257 ALUMINUM DOLLY 10042244 833 - 049550 -1 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 100287 SUPPLIES 10042239 834 - 689358 -2 001. 122240- 652990 -00000 0.00 057883 WATER COOLER 10042238 483 - 832583 -7 001- 122240 - 652110 -00000 0.00 057884 RAINSUITS 10042717 931 - 367313 -0 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 059359 SUPPLIES 10041762 482 - 932974 -9 101 - 163620 - 652990.00000 0.00 101 - 163620 - 652910.00000 0.00 101= 163620- 653900 -00000 0.00 101 - 163620 - 651930 -00000 0.00 101 - 163620. 652140 -00000 0.00 100588 KNEEPADS 10042244 835 - 611837.5 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 100287 SUPPLIES 10040158 973 - 704780 -4 111 - 156332 - 646316 -00000 0.00 107058 - WATER COOLER 10042245 833 - 509197.4 408- 233352 - 652990 -00000 0.00 101124 SUPPLIES 10042698 835 - 606242 -5 408. 210130- 652910 -00000 0.00 101453 SUPPLIES 10042244 931 - 970839 -3 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 100287 SUPPLIES 10042698 973 - 731343 -8 408 - 210130 - 652910 -00000 0.00 101453 SUPPLIES 10042573 048 - 712871 -2 408 - 233352 - 652990 -00000 0.00 101124 SUPPLIES 10042246 834. 832584 -9 408 - 210130. 652910 -00000 0.00 101453 SUPPLIES 10042698 961 - 119701 -4 408 - 210130- 652910 -00000 0.00 101453 SUPPLIES 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 361.25 0.00 123.89 0.00 172.07 0.00 423.73 0.00 359.76 0.00 146.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.69 0.00 94.08 720.25 19.43 251.60 101.28 244.96 1,057.32 456.49 105.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 64 VCHR NET 361.25 123.89 172.07 423.73 359.76 146.14 20.69 94.08 720.25 19.43 251.60 101.28 244.96 1,057.32 456.49 105.17 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042245 287 - 625264 -0 101124 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408 - 233352 - 652990 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558903 VENDOR 7900 - GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 10042243 0630201410 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 105978 DISCOUNT 0.00 10043295 0630204622 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 101097 CREDIT 0.00 10043209 0630203847 408. 253221 - 655100 -00000 0.00 101271 PARTS /DISCOUNT 0.00 10043141 0630203406 001 - 122240 - 652993.00000 0.00 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 0.00 10043208 0630203742 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 0.00 10043141 0630203169 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 0.00 10042705 0630203256 408- 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 100518 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 0.00 10043141 0630203493 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630197124 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 105978 CREDIT 10042240 0630202042 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 100997 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042243 0630201410 001 - 122240. 652991 -00000 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10043141 0630197556 001. 122240 - 652993 -00000 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10043209 0630187152 408 - 253221 - 655100 -00000 101271 PARTS /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203406 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10042706 0630203250 408 - 233312 - 655200.00000 101097 SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 26.52 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.35- 0.00 0.00 2.14- 0.00 0.00 1.89- 0.00 0.00 46.25 0.00 0.00 2.69- 0.00 0.00 121.30 0.00 0.00 0.35- 0.00 0.00 3.84 0.00 0.00 1.508.00- 0.00 0.00 0.04- 0.00 0.00 17.28 0.00 0.00 185.50 0.00 0.00 249.87 0.00 0.00 0.46- 0.00 0.00 0.80- 0.00 PAGE 65 VCHR NET 26.52 4.801.99 0.35 - 2.14- 1.89- 46.25 2.69- 121.30 0.35- 3.84 1.508.00 - 0.04- 17.28 185.50 249.87 0.46 - 0.80- OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 66 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042242 0630202188 408. 233312- 655200 -00000 0.00 134.44 0.00 134.44 101097 SUPPLIES 10043209 0630203847 408 - 253221 - 655100 -00000 0.00 99.68 0.00 99.68 101271 PARTS /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203493 001 - 122240. 652991 -00000 0.00 0.08- 0.00 0.08- 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630202582 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 132.18 0.00 132.18 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630202505 001 - 122240 - 652991.00000 0.00 11.56 0.00 11.56 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630195618 001- 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 1,508.00 0.00 1,508.00 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10043208 0630203921 001. 122240- 652991 -00000 0.00 0.53- 0.00 0.53- 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630202580 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 105.60 0.00 105.60 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS 10042706 0630203250 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 43.60 0.00 43.60 101097 SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042695 0630203889 408- 233351 - 655100.00000 0.00 0.10- 0.00 0.10- 101003 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630202582 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 2.54- 0.00 2.54- 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10042240 0630202042 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 68.44 0.00 68.44 100997 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203407 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 0.67- 0.00 0.67- 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203744 001 - 122240. 652991 -00000 0.00 0.25- 0.00 0.25- 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042695 0630203889 408 - 233351 - 655100 -00000 0.00 7.28 0.00 7.28 101003 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042241 0630202544 408 - 233351 - 655100 -00000 0.00 289.80 0.00 289.80 101003 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10041756 0630202246 111 - 156332 - 652991 -00000 0.00 652.32 0.00 652.32 100609 SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043141 0630202749 001 - 122240 - 652991.00000 0.00 57.15 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043208 0630203988 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 31.59 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203744 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 12.50 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043208 0630203996 001- 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 1.82- 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203155 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 125.34 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042240 0630202736 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 39.22 0.00 100997 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042242 0630201899 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 24.11- 0.00 101097 CREDIT 10042205 0630202916 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 0.29- 0.00 100518 DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203153 001 - 122240. 652993 -00000 0.00 0.43- 0.00 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10043208 0630203742 001- 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 134.61 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042240 0630202736 408 - 233351. 652990.00000 0.00 0.74- 0.00 100997 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042705 0630203256 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 17.31 0.00 100518 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042242 0630202188 408- 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 2.47- 0.00 101097 DISCOUNT 10043141 0630197556 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 1.80- 0.00 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10042205 0630202916 408- 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 15.20 0.00 100518 PARTS /SUPPLIES 10043208 0630204097 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 1.61- 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203169 001. 122240- 652993 -00000 0.00 2.00- 0.00 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043141 0630203407 001. 122240. 652993 -00000 0.00 33.34 0.00 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10043208 0630203988 001. 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 0.63- 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10042696 0630204624 408 - 233312. 655200 -00000 0.00 358.47 0.00 101097 SUPPLIES 10042241 0630202544 408 - 233351 - 655100 -00000 0.00 5.79- 0.00 101003 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10041756 0630202349 111 - 156332 - 652991 -00000 0.00 428.44 0.00 100609 SUPPLIES 10043141 0630202749 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 1.14- 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043208 0630203996 001. 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 91.45 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203155 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 2.38- 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630202505 001 - 122240 - 652991.00000 0.00 0.12- 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043208 0630203921 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 26.81 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT 10043141 0630203153 001 - 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 21.68 0.00 105978 LIGHTING /BALLASTS /DISCOUNT 10043208 0630204097 001 - 122240. 652991.00000 0.00 80.63 0.00 105978 PARTS /SUPPLIES /DISCOUNT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559147 VENDOR 239140 - GREAT AMERICA LEASING CORPORATION 10041476 2045857 111 - 156310 - 644620 -00000 0.00 577.00 130 - 157710 - 640300 -00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 101210 LEASED COPIER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559060 VENDOR 167590 - GREG MIHALIC 10042465 9/10 MBA LUNCH G.MIHALIC 191 - 138785 - 654360 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 9/10 MBA LUNCH G.MIHALIC OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 69 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 CHECK NO 558967 VENDOR 106780 - GREGORY COURT REPORTING 10042652 955126 001 - 010510 - 633010 -00000 0.00 72.31 0.00 72.31 059287 APPEARANCE FEES 10042577 955776 681 - 410310 - 633043 -00000 0.00 86.95 0.00 86.95 D.RICE 00- 681 - CFA -DRM 10043136 956156 313. 163673 - 633043 -60071 0.00 43.75 0.00 43.75 058574 DEP.GOODLETTE 01- 1088 -CA 10042583 955989 681 - 410310- 633033 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 W.GANLEY 01- 575 -CFA 10043135 956179 313 - 163673 - 633043 -60071 0.00 78.75 0.00 78.75 058573 DEP.HENDERLONG 01- 1088 -CA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 311.76 CHECK NO 559429 VENDOR 344120 GULF COAST SURGICAL ASSISTANTS 10043165 C EMERTON 4/19 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 260.00 0.00 260.00 59441 C EMERTON 4/19 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 260.00 CHECK NO 559201 VENDOR 263220 GULF STATES INC. 10043000 #1 414 - 263611 - 763100.74015 0.00 11,700.00 0.00 11,700.00 105814 - THRU 8/31/01 10043000 #1 RETAINAGE 414 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 1,170.00- 0.00 1,170.00- 105814 - RETAINAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10,530.00 CHECK NO 558904 VENDOR 8180 HARBORSIDE ANIMAL CLINIC 10042710 121670 001 - 155410. 631980 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 059377 COMPREHENSIVE CARE 01 -2554 10042700 121726 001 - 155410 - 631980.00000 0.00 96.00 0.00 96.00 059379 COMPREHENSIVE CARE 01 -2588 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 253.25 CHECK NO 559009 VENDOR 131720 - HARCROS CHEMICALS, INC. OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041758 740054585 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,154.96 0.00 100252 CHEMICAL 10042593 740054554 408 - 233312 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2.320.80 0.00 100529 CHEMICALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559373 VENDOR 337970 - HARRELL'S 10042237 INV00053557 111 - 156332 - 652310 -00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 056297 CHEMICALS 10043134 INV00053247 111 - 156334 - 652310 -00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 058150 TURFACE MVP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559004 VENDOR 130140 - HAWKEYE SIGNS 10042203 52858 681 - 421510 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 106627 UPGRADE DIRECTORIES /NEW SLATS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559411 VENDOR 343340 - HEFTY TRUCKING INC 10042701 10908 111 - 156332 - 646315.00000 0.00 520.00 0.00 107558 2 LOADS FILL DIRT 10043020 10922 111 - 156332 - 646315 -00000 0.00 9,361.00 0.00 107544 HAUL CLAY FROM BABSON PK.,FL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559102 VENDOR 199810 HELENE ROSSLER 10043224 TRVL 9/5 -26 H ROSSLER 123 - 155960 - 640200 -33060 0.00 30.45 0.00 TRVL 9/5.26 H ROSSLER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558905 VENDOR 8810 HOLE MONTES AND ASSOC INC 10043013 41997 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33383 0.00 26.920.00 0.00 106876 THRU 8/24/01 10043387 42032 413 - 263611 - 631400.73128 0.00 450.00 0.00 105581 THRU 8/24/01 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J I PAGE 71 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043010 41999 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33343 0.00 6,216.40 0.00 6,216.40 103670 7/28/01 THRU 8/24/01 10043009 41998 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33326 0.00 1,056.80 0.00 1,056.80 102558 THRU 8/24/01 10043011 41995 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33327 0.00 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 103671 THRU 8/24/01 10043385 41854/2000055 413 - 263611 - 631400 -73949 0.00 40,427.50 0.00 40,427.50 402887 - 6/30/7/27/01 10043012 41996 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33327 0.00 5,887.00 0.00 5,887.00 103672 - THRU 8/24/01 10043385 41656/2000055 413 - 263611 - 631400 -73949 0.00 73,963.00 0.00 73,963.00 402887 - 5/26- 6/29/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 156.420.70 CHECK NO 559051 VENDOR 164250 - HOME DEPOT 10042216 9081948 001- 156363. 652990 -00000 0.00 4.98 0.00 4.98 104678 BUILDING MATERIAL 10041757 8220031 313 - 163673 - 763100.66066 0.00 1,869.84 313 - 163673 - 763100.60016 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,869.84 104495 RIP RAP 10042697 7012265 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 64.46 0.00 64.46 104681 BUILDING MATERIAL 10042697 3150889 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 75.85 0.00 75.85 104681 BUILDING MATERIAL 10043216 5021935 001 - 156363. 652990.00000 0.00 47.76 0.00 47.76 104678 BUILDING MATERIAL 10042697 8021795 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 59.49 0.00 59.49 104681 BUILDING MATERIAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,122.38 CHECK NO 559344 VENDOR 328710 - HOME DEPOT 10041770 9190337 101 - 163646 - 652990 -00000 0.00 75.76 0.00 75.76 058771 LADDER /DIAZ 10041769 8090559 101- 163646 - 652990 -00000 0.00 24.43 0.00 24.43 058832 GLOVES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 72 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.19 CHECK NO 559235 VENDOR 281640 - HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 10042678 6212310 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 158.65 0.00 158.65 35763120001 W LAUGHREY 058802 10041983 4192344 191 - 138785. 884100 -00000 0.00 1,111.78 0.00 1,111.78 62156480004 E SIMEUS 107039 10041921 3202331 (CREDIT) 191 - 138785. 884100 -00000 0.00 44.91- 0.00 44.91- 30805000385 L TORRES 58624 10041984 9212404 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 1,257.66 0.00 1.257.66 36249160005 T LYONS 107377 10041922 2192421 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 361.71 0.00 361.71 36438320009 A FEIJOO 58553 10041922 4190088 (CREDIT) 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 88.00- 0.00 88.00- 36438320009 A FEIJ00 58553 10041923 4192343 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 80240000149 M LEPORE 58425 10041919 8212121 191. 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 568.69 0.00 568.69 8264064000 J GARCIA 107041 10041986 3192370 191 - 138785. 884100 -00000 0.00 1.963.42 0.00 1,963.42 36123720008 I AGUILERA 107038 10041925 3220095 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 306.00 0.00 306.00 36302960003 R WELLS 58924 10041921 7212284 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 403.75 0.00 403.75 30805000385 L TORRES 58624 10041985 1212220 191- 138785- 884100.00000 0.00 1,037.33 0.00 1,037.33 80240000149 M LEPORE 107158 10041918 3212187 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 723.88 0.00 723.88 40624400004 S NAVARRO 107157 10041924 9192189 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 10624400004 S NAVARRO 58426 10041920 4211739 191. 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 218.88 0.00 218.88 36962520003 S BRYAN 57517 10041987 3192371 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 2,106.73 0.00 2.106.73 36438320009 A FEOJ00 107040 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559299 VENDOR 314010 - HORSESHOE DEVELOPMENT L.C. 10042401 8/01 LEASE 101 - 163612 - 644100 -00000 0.00 4,240.77 0.00 107483 8/01 LEASE 10042401 9/01 LEASE 101- 163612 - 644100 -00000 0.00 4,240.77 0.00 107483 9/01 LEASE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559228 VENDOR 279710 - HORVATH ELECTRIC MOTORS 10042251 0148 408 - 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.152.75 0.00 104476 MOTOR /PUMP REBUILDS 10042251 0989 408- 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,864.13 0.00 104476 MOTOR /PUMP REBUILDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559207 VENDOR 266220 - HOWARD R. BOURDAGES M.D. 10043137 E.SANCHEZ 9/13/01 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 059375 E.SANCHEZ 9/13/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559167 VENDOR 252720 - HUDSON PUMPS & PROCESS EQUIPMENT 10041474 I- 42114 -0 408 - 253221 - 655100 -00000 0.00 433.34 0.00 100290 PARTS FOR PUMPS /N.PLANT 10041474 I. 42114 -0 408 - 253221 - 655100 -00000 0.00 152.35 0.00 058472 PARTS FOR PUMP /N.PLANT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559089 VENDOR 189680 - HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS 10043149 8953 195 - 110406 - 631400 -10293 0.00 5,815.89 0.00 104107 - 7/01 SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559144 VENDOR 238740 - HY TECH WHOLESALE 10042228 44484 470 - 173435 - 764900 -00000 0.00 434.50 0.00 058405 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041764 43961 470 - 173435. 764900 -00000 0.00 497.00 0.00 055914 DATA PROCESSING EQUIP. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559276 VENDOR 301000 - HY -TECH WHOLESALE NAPLES 10042582 43294 101- 163612 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 057364 56K EXTERNAL MODEM & CABLE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558906 VENDOR 9020 - HYDRAULIC HOSE AND EQUIP 10042713 96116 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 425.94 0.00 059426 PARTS 10042164 096052 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 72.90 0.00 100101 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559287 VENDOR 308470 - I -CON SYSTEMS INC 10042511 70142 001 - 122240 - 652995 -00000 0.00 198.24 0.00 57905 BATTERY FLUSH VALVE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558907 VENDOR 9110 ICMA 10043167 #302330 J DUNNUCK 001- 100110- 654210 -00000 0.00 333.75 0.00 59413 J DUNNUCK DUES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559385 VENDOR 339830 IKON /IOS CAPITAL 10042409 52786587 101 - 163612 - 644620 -00000 0.00 229.63 0.00 106592 9/29 -10/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558908 VENDOR 9250 - IMMOKALEE UTILITY CORP 10043081 1140010100 8/9 -9/16 495 - 192330 - 643400 -00000 0.00 56.40 0.00 1140010100 8/9 -9/16 102161 10043081 1140010200 8/9 -9/16 495 - 192330 - 643400.00000 0.00 27.93 0.00 1140010200 8/9 -9/16 102161 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043081 1140010500 8/9 -9/16 495 - 192330 - 643400 -00000 0.00 27.64 0.00 1140010500 8/9 -9/16 102161 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559027 VENDOR 147920 - IMMOKALEE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 10043401 1130010200 8/5 -9/10 101. 163620 - 643400 -00000 0.00 124.16 0.00 1130010200 8/5 -9/10 10043401 2111161500 8/7 -9/17 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 1,460.13 0.00 2111161500 8/7 -9/17 10043401 2104011800 8/21.9/19 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 24.57 0.00 2104011800 8/21 -9/19 10042517 62951 496. 192340 - 763100 -33349 0.00 365.00 0.00 59090 REVIEW DEV DRAWINGS 10042518 62949 496 - 192340 - 763100.33327 0.00 267.50 0.00 59088 REVIEW DEV DRAWINGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559099 VENDOR 196420 - IMSA 10042519 DUES ID 16164 BATHON 313 - 163611 - 654210 -00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 58572 DUES ID 16164 BATHON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559496 VENDOR 900080 - INEZ BOURLAND 212761 AMB REF BOURLAND 11 /10 /01 490 - 000000. 116004 -00000 0.00 320.00 0.00 AMB REF BOURLAND 013542 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559052 VENDOR 164780 - INFO PLUS 10043079 108 473 - 173411 - 634999 -00000 0.00 0.00 408- 210151. 634999 -00000 0.00 600.00 0.00 106304 9/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558980 VENDOR 115600 - INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT SERV. 10043091 12344 516 - 121650 - 645910 -00000 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 BUILDERS RISK OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 559256 VENDOR 290590 INTELITRAN 10043202 TD000801 102147 VASQUEZ /FAULK 10043202 CCDOT0801 102147 7/01 DENIALS 10043393 CCDOT0801 102147 8/01 10043393 CCDOT0801 106739 8/01 10043092 CCSS0801 106980 8/01 10043202 CCDOT0801 102147 8/01 10043092 CCSS0801 104341 8 /01 10043392 CCDOT0801 105575 8/01 10043393 CCDOT0801 105575 8/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 126 - 138330 - 634999 -00000 0.00 126 - 138330 - 634999 -00000 0.00 126 - 138330- 634999 -00000 0.00 126 - 138330 - 634999 -33722 0.00 123 - 155975 - 634104 -33075 0.00 126. 138330 - 634999 -00000 0.00 123 - 155973 - 634104 -33073 0.00 126. 138333- 634999 -33278 0.00 126 - 138333. 634999 -33278 0.00 CHECK NO 559265 VENDOR 296020 - INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS 10043193 2057749 THRU 8/14/01 001 - 000000. 202800 -00000 0.00 2057749 THRU 8/14/01 CHECK NO 559298 VENDOR 313840 - IOSCAPITAL 10043160 52769856 102870 9/26 -10/25 10042504 52769859 103581 9/27 -10/26 10043160 52786594 102870 9/29 -10/29 16JI PAGE 76 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,000.00 3,836.89 0.00 3,836.89 96.00 0.00 96.00 35,746.00 0.00 35,746.00 29,857.00 0.00 29,857.00 120.00 0.00 120.00 574.00 0.00 574.00 9,421.50 0.00 9,421.50 8,322.00 0.00 8,322.00 8,322.00 0.00 8,322.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 96,295.39 23.39 0.00 23.39 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 23.39 681 - 431310 - 644620 -00000 0.00 391.73 0.00 391.73 681 - 410710 - 644620 -00000 0.00 268.40 0.00 268.40 681 - 431310 - 644620 -00000 0.00 9.70 0.00 9.70 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10043080 52806693 100763 9/30.10/30 10043080 52806700 100763 9/30 -10/30 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681 - 421510. 644620 -00000 0.00 681 - 421510 - 644620.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559128 VENDOR 229190 - IRON MOUNTAIN 10042407 8630519 111 - 138911 - 649990 -00000 101347 8/01 10042407 8630518 113 - 138930- 644170 -00000 102437 8 /01 10042407 8630520 113 - 138312 - 644170 -00000 100482 8/01 CHECK NO 559378 VENDOR 339070 - J &J WHOLESALE NURSERY 10042529 1175 322 - 183825 - 763100 -00000 106410 PLANTS CHECK NO 559134 VENDOR 231810 J. M. TODD COMPANY 10042506 64117 311.69 001 - 000000. 142500 -00000 311.69 101200 8/29.9/28 1,605.84 10042403 60230 0.00 001 - 000000- 142500 -00000 0.00 101200 6/25 -7/24 560.00 10042411 59569 0.00 001 - 000000. 142500 -00000 0.00 101200 STAPLES 81.73 10042403 60233 0.00 001 - 000000- 142500.00000 0.00 101200 6/29 -7/28 73.11 10042506 64115 0.00 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 101200 8/29 -9/28 372.41 10042403 60227 0.00 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 101200 6/25 -7/24 539.94 10042506 64120 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 101200 8/29 -9/28 16J1 PAGE 77 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 624.32 0.00 624.32 311.69 0.00 311.69 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,605.84 0.00 76.19 0.00 76.19 0.00 487.35 0.00 487.35 0.00 87.53 0.00 87.53 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 651.07 0.00 560.00 0.00 560.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 560.00 0.00 81.73 0.00 81.73 0.00 307.02 0.00 307.02 0.00 73.11 0.00 73.11 0.00 132.68 0.00 132.68 0.00 372.41 0.00 372.41 0.00 277.42 0.00 277.42 0.00 539.94 0.00 539.94 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 78 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042506 64114 001 - 000000. 142500 -00000 0.00 268.05 0.00 268.05 101200 8/25 -9/24 10042506 64112 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 229.59 0.00 229.59 101200 8/25.9/24 10042506 64111 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 398.53 0.00 398.53 101200 8/25 -9/24 10042403 60229 001 - 000000- 142500 -00000 0.00 69.21 0.00 69.21 101200 6/25 -7/24 10042506 64118 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 82.95 0.00 82.95 101200 8/29 -9/28 10042403 60395 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 300.76 0.00 300.76 101200 6/25 -7/24 10042403 60234 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 494.60 0.00 494.60 101200 6/29 -7/28 10042506 64110 001 - 000000. 142500 -00000 0.00 158.67 0.00 158.67 101200 8/25 -9/24 10042403 60231 001- 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 307.88 0.00 307.88 101200 6/29 -7/28 10042403 60232 001 - 000000. 142500 -00000 0.00 108.10 0.00 108.10 101200 6/29.7/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,202.65 CHECK NO 559063 VENDOR 169530 J. ROLAND LIEBER, P.A. 10042530 0101 -0103 109 - 182900 - 634999 -00000 0.00 380.00 0.00 380.00 100182 SVS TO 9/22/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 380.00 CHECK NO 558911 VENDOR 10570 J. W. CRAFT 10042508 20991 001 - 172930. 652990.00000 0.00 82.50 0.00 82.50 100301 8/5.9/1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 82.50 CHECK NO 559370 VENDOR 336570 J.A. WEBSTER, INC. 10042500 1121883 001 - 155410 - 652710.00000 0.00 0.10- 0.00 0.10- 107296 - SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042500 1139949 107296 SUPPLIES 10042500 1141665 107296 SUPPLIES 10042500 1141665 107296 SUPPLIES 10042500 1139949 107296 SUPPLIES 10042500 1121883 107296 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155410- 652710 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652710.00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 001. 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559019 VENDOR 139990 J.C. DRAINFIELD 10043088 4028 0.00 10.25 408 - 233351. 634999 -00000 CHECK TOTAL 100205 TANKER SVS 1,100.00 10043088 4091 0.00 1,100.00 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 CHECK TOTAL 100205 TANKER SVS 10043088 4030 408- 233351 - 634999 -00000 100205 TANKER SVS 10043088 3993 408. 233351- 634999 -00000 100205 TANKER SVS 10043088 3989 408 - 233351. 634999 -00000 100205 TANKER SUS 10043088 4029 408 - 233351 - 634999.00000 100205 TANKER SVS 10043088 4089 408. 233351 - 634999 -00000 100205 TANKER SUS 10043088 4027 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 100205 TANKER SVS 10043088 4088 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 100205 TANKER SVS 10043088 4090 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 100205 TANKER SUS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 10.69- 0.00 49.56- 0.00 4,956.00 0.00 1,067.96 0.00 10.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 800.00 0.00 2,325.00 0.00 1,600.00 0.00 1,725.00 0.00 800.00 0.00 1,925.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 2,625.00 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 80 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 559130 VENDOR 231020 - J.M. TODD COMPANY 10043082 63768 408 - 233313 - 651210 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 104287 9/22 -10/21 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.00 CHECK NO 558909 VENDOR 9540 JACK AND ANN'S FEED 10042507 61446 111. 156334- 652990 -00000 0.00 21.49 0.00 21.49 100696 SUPPLIES 10042503 61737 001 - 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 512.00 0.00 512.00 107677 PANELS 10042413 61675 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.74 59156 SUPPLIES 10042522 62052 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 35.16 0.00 35.16 59315 SUPPLIES 10042507 61446 111 - 156334. 652910.00000 0.00 81.89 0.00 81.89 100696 SUPPLIES 10042507 60930 111 - 156334 - 652990 -00000 0.00 136.32 0.00 136.32 100696 SUPPLIES 10042412 61067 111 - 156334 - 652910 -00000 0.00 23.27 0.00 23.27 100696 SUPPLIES 10042522 59670 001- 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 4.79 0.00 4.79 59315 SUPPLIES 10042507 61970 111 - 156334 - 652990 -00000 0.00 48.68 0.00 48.68 100696 SUPPLIES 10042412 61060 111. 156334- 652990 -00000 0.00 212.99 0.00 212.99 100696 SUPPLIES 10042412 61067 111- 156334 - 652990 -00000 0.00 33.93 0.00 33.93 100696 SUPPLIES 10042510 61841 001 - 155410- 652910 -00000 0.00 381.70 0.00 381.70 59300 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,492.96 CHECK NO 559036 VENDOR 156680 JACK LYONS TRUCK PARTS, INC. 10043083 143102 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 18.40 0.00 18.40 59407 BOLT PART OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 81 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18.40 CHECK NO 559149 VENDOR 239620 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 10042404 48871 101 - 163630 - 652910 -00000 0.00 1,632.00 0.00 1,632.00 107316 DMI KIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,632.00 CHECK NO 558989 VENDOR 122410 JAMES B. BOORSTIN, M.D. 10043300 W CRANE 00 -778 681 - 421190. 631010 -00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 W CRANE 00 -778 10043300 J SALSBURY 97 -2189 681 - 421190 - 631010 -00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 J SALSBURY 97 -2189 10043300 K TALBOT 00.617 681 - 421190 - 631010.00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 K TALBOT 00 -617 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 900.00 CHECK NO 559258 VENDOR 290640 - JAMES C. ABNEY & ASSOC. 10043168 #248 346 - 116360. 634999 -80081 0.00 85.00 0.00 85.00 58729 IRRIGATION LAYOUT /SUGDEN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 85.00 CHECK NO 559229 VENDOR 279840 JAMES CARTER 10042790 9/27 TRVL J CARTER 001 - 010110 - 640310 -01002 0.00 13.92 0.00 13.92 9/27 TRVL J CARTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13.92 CHECK NO 559346 VENDOR 329950 JAMES COLETTA 10042791 9/19 REP DUDLEY /J COLETTA 001. 010110 - 640310 -01005 0.00 17.00 0.00 17.00 9/19 REP DUDLEY /J COLETTA 10043109 9/28 NAACP /J COLETTA 001 - 010110- 640310 -01005 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 9/28 NAACP /J COLETTA 10043109 5/01 -9/01 TRVL J COLETTA 001 - 010110. 640200 -00000 0.00 697.86 0.00 697.86 5/01 -9/01 TRVL J COLETTA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 764.86 CHECK NO 559497 VENDOR 900080 - JAMES E DIMENT OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 212762 AMB REF DIMENT 3/10/01 490. 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 50.03 0.00 AMB REF DIMENT 0115943.1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559464 VENDOR 900050 - JAMES MITCHELL 212723 REIB INS - J MITCHELL 517 - 121640- 645920 -00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 J MITCHELL REIMB INS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559498 VENDOR 900080 - JAMES SPIVEY 212763 AMB REF SPIVEY 6/24/01 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 315.00 0.00 AMB REF SPIVEY 0125934.1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558983 VENDOR 116700 - JAMESON SUPPLY INC. 10042514 73930 001- 122240 - 652995.00000 0.00 38.40 0.00 59320 SPUDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559439 VENDOR 344420 JAMIE MACCOU 10042810 9/4 -24 TRVL J MACCOU 001 - 121140 - 640200 -00000 0.00 60.18 0.00 9/4 -24 TRVL J MACCOU CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559445 VENDOR 344480 JANE MARTIN 10042806 6/1 -7/31 TRVL J MARTIN 001 - 156140 - 640200.00000 0.00 145.00 0.00 6/1 -7/31 TRVL J MARTIN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559293 VENDOR 310970 JASON C SEITZ 10041088 9/2 -30 TRVL J SEITZ 001 - 178985 - 640200 -00000 0.00 174.00 0.00 9/2 -30 TRVL J SEITZ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559441 VENDOR 344440 JAY SEIDEL 10042809 9/10 -13 TRVL J SEIDL 001 - 100130 - 640300.00000 0.00 116.24 0.00 9/10 -13 TRVL J SEIDL OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559146 VENDOR 239070 - JEAN MERRITT 10042671 7/31 -9/20 TRVL J MERRITT 001 - 100130 - 640200 -00000 0.00 27.84 0.00 7/31 -9/20 TRVL J MERRITT 10042671 8/7 -9/20 TRVL J MERRITT 001- 100130- 640300 -00000 0.00 69.60 0.00 8/7 -9/20 TRVL J MERRITT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559221 VENDOR 275830 JEAN MERRITT 10043087 PETTY CASH 001. 100130 - 652990 -00000 0.00 41.76 0.00 PETTY CASH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559425 VENDOR 344050 JENINE C. OUILLETTE 10043170 9/17 2 HRS 681 - 431590. 634402 -00000 0.00 26.00 0.00 OUILETTE 9/17 2 HRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559515 VENDOR 900090 JEREMY M. HARROLD 212729 WITNESS FEES- J HARROLD 681 - 421190 - 635900.00000 0.00 6.20 0.00 WITNESS FEES - J HARROLD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559448 VENDOR 344510 JERRY KURTZ 10042803 9/19 -21 TRVL J KURTZ 001 - 172910 - 640300 -00000 0.00 195.50 0.00 9/19 -21 TRVL J KRUTZ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558910 VENDOR 10160 JOHN COLLINS AUTO PARTS, INC. 10042513 726134 109 - 182901- 652990 -00000 0.00 9.94 0.00 58829 V BELTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559164 VENDOR 249800 - JOHN DEERE CO. 10043159 05 -58861 111 - 156334. 764990 -00000 0.00 13,201.92 0.00 107002 MOWER OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043157 05 -58843 111 - 156332. 764990 -00000 0.00 13,201.92 0.00 107056 MOWER 10043156 05 -58842 111 - 156332 - 764990 -00000 0.00 0.00 111 - 156332 - 764150 -00000 0.00 15,577.20 0.00 106990 TRACTOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558969 VENDOR 107980 - JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. 10042402 49751185 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,383.62 0.00 107599 SECURITY SVS 10042402 49751215 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2.287.04 0.00 107599 SECURITY SUS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559499 VENDOR 900080 - JOSE DIEGUEZ 212764 AMB REF DIEGUEZ 5/25/01 490 - 000000. 116004 -00000 0.00 255.00 0.00 AMB REF DIEGUEZ 0123530 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559500 VENDOR 900080 - JOSEPH A WESCOTT 212765 AMB REF WESTCOTT 3/19/00 490 - 000000- 116004.00000 0.00 96.52 0.00 AMB REF WESTCOTT 0015209 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559310 VENDOR 316820 - JOSEPH CHEATHAM 10042466 9/19 -20 FUEL J.CHEATHAM 408- 210120 - 640300.00000 0.00 28.45 0.00 9/19 -20 FUEL JOSEPH CHEATHAM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559430 VENDOR 344130 - JOSEPH GAUTA, M.D., P.A. 10043163 M GREGORY 7/5/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 293.80 0.00 59440 M GREGORY 7/5/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559501 VENDOR 900080 - JOSEPHINE IRENE 212766 AMB REF IRENE 6/7/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 56.29 0.00 AMB REF IRENE 0124643 -1 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559502 VENDOR 900080 - JOYCE THWAITS 212767 AMB REF THWAITS 5/6/01 490.000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 59.81 0.00 AMB REF TWAITS 0121809 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559211 VENDOR 267290 - JUDI BODINE 10042520 PETTY CASH 001 - 100110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 16.91 0.00 PETTY CASH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559091 VENDOR 190380 JUST COMPENSATION 10042414 SUB RENEWAL 001 - 122310 - 654110 -00000 0.00 115.00 0.00 59220 SUB RENEWAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559148 VENDOR 239450 KAREN D. ARNOLD 10043226 9/10 -13 TRVL K ARNOLD 001 - 100130.640300 -00000 0.00 83.96 0.00 9/10 -13 TRVL K ARNOLD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559442 VENDOR 344450 KATHERINE SMITH 10043089 J WAGONER 9/01 001 - 155930 - 634153 -00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 J WAGONER 9/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559324 VENDOR 322300 KATHLEEN CASEY 10042406 8/2 -9/20 YOGA 111 - 156380 - 634999.00000 0.00 447.20 0.00 100679 8/2.9/20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558912 VENDOR 10690 KELLY BLUEPRINTERS 10042509 6686 001 - 172910 - 647110 -00000 0.00 1.23 0.00 106422 BLUELINE 10043161 7057 113 - 138312 - 651210.00000 0.00 13.21 0.00 104822 SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042509 6796 001 - 172910. 647110 -00000 0.00 10.56 0.00 106422 BLUELINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559465 VENDOR 900050 - KELLY DUFFY 212728 REFUND PARKS DUFFY 111 - 000000 - 208901 -00000 0.00 2.40 0.00 REFUND PARKS DUFFY 212727 REFUND PARKS DUFFY 111 - 156313- 347911 -00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 REFUND PARKS DUFFY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558913 VENDOR 10770 KELLY SERVICES 10042516 37154986 113 - 138913- 634999 -00000 0.00 359.04 0.00 59308 TEMPS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559466 VENDOR 900050 KENCO DEVELOPMENT INC 212714 REF 289041 KENCO 113 - 000000. 115420 -00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 REF 289041 KENCO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559467 VENDOR 900050 KENCO DEVELOPMENT, INC. 212784 245892 PEBBLEBROOK LAKE 113 - 138900. 341260 -00000 0.00 650.00 0.00 245892 PEBBLEBROOK LAKE PH 4 212784 245892 PEBBLEBROOK LAKE 113 - 138900 - 323700 -00000 0.00 1,880.71 0.00 245892 PEBBLEBROOK LAKE PH 4 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559145 VENDOR 238950 KENNETH B. SEIFERT MD.PA. 10043164 R ADAMS 6/6 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 113.76 0.00 59387 R ADAMS 6/6 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559468 VENDOR 900050 KEYSTONE CUSTOM HOMES 212713 REF 288771 KEYSTONE 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 33.00 0.00 REF 288771 KEYSTONE OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559424 VENDOR 344020 KIND NEWS 10042512 96764 001 - 155410 - 654110 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 59253 SUBSCRIPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558914 VENDOR 10900 KREHLING INDUSTRIES 10043200 180183 111 - 156334 - 646316 -00000 0.00 947.33 0.00 107255 BLOCK 10043076 180342 111. 156334 - 646315 -00000 0.00 465.41 0.00 107195 SAND 10042408 383747 111 - 163645 - 653150 -00000 0.00 284.00 0.00 100817 CEMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559078 VENDOR 179430 KYLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 10043146 21.102 408- 253212 - 634999.00000 0.00 4,406.96 0.00 107705 REPAIR 10043158 21 -86 408 - 253212.634999 -00000 0.00 5,175.24 0.00 106973 REPAIRS 10043145 21.98 412 - 273511 - 634999.70057 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 107225 REPAIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559469 VENDOR 900050 LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION 212712 REF 289232 LANDMARK 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 11.45 0.00 REF 289232 LANDMARK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559400 VENDOR 342270 LAURIE CARLSON AND ASSOCIATES 10042405 26324 111 - 156334 - 646315 -00000 0.00 1,190.00 0.00 107194 LINE STRIPER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559470 VENDOR 900050 LAURIE SCHEND OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 212779 REFUND PARKS SCHEND 111 - 156380 - 347990 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 SCHEND REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559503 VENDOR 900080 - LAVETA S. ALLEY CHECK TOTAL 212768 AMB REF ALLEY 5 -6 -01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 285.00 AMB REF ALLEY 0121850 -1 285.00 CHECK NO 559008 VENDOR 130950 - LAW ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 40.23 10043171 4033506552 346. 116360 - 634999 -80013 0.00 119.95 58733 TESTING 0.00 57.50 CHECK NO 559014 VENDOR 135200 LAWN EQUIPMENT CENTER 815.88 10043078 47761 111. 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 229.44 107648 CHAIN SAWS 0.00 331.96 10042525 47912 109 - 182901- 652990.00000 0.00 0.00 100180 EQUIP PARTS 10042526 47847 109. 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100180 EQUIP PARTS 10042524 47977 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100180 EQUIP PARTS 10042523 46285 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100180 EQUIP PARTS 10043077 47913 111 - 156332. 652910 -00000 0.00 107348 CHAIN SAW 10043172 46368 109 - 182901 - 652990.00000 0.00 100180 PARTS 10042515 46284 109 - 182901 - 652910 -00000 0.00 58830 GRASS TRIMMER CHECK NO 559105 VENDOR 201490 LEADERSHIP DIRECTORIES INC. 10043085 242370 -7 RENEWAL 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 59352 RENEWAL PAGE 88 VCHR NET 60.00 60.00 28.15 0.00 28.15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 28.15 285.00 0.00 285.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 285.00 957.83 0.00 957.83 40.23 0.00 40.23 119.95 0.00 119.95 57.50 0.00 57.50 39.85 0.00 39.85 815.88 0.00 815.88 229.44 0.00 229.44 331.96 0.00 331.96 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,592.64 325.00 0.00 325.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 89 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 325.00 CHECK NO 558915 VENDOR 11110 - LEE CO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 10043402 20195. 114172 8/17 -9/19 001- 156160- 643100 -00000 0.00 2,318.68 0.00 2,318.68 20195 - 114172 8/17 -9/19 10043402 20195 - 171307 6/19 -9/20 101 - 163630 - 643100 -00000 0.00 125.80 0.00 125.80 20195 - 171307 6/19 -9/20 10043402 20195 - 154754 9/24 001 - 013010 - 643100 -00000 0.00 980.94 0.00 980.94 20195 - 154754 9/24 10043162 20195. 154798 9/12 495 - 192330 - 643100 -00000 0.00 986.48 0.00 986.48 20195- 154798 9/12 101969 10043402 20195- 154733SL 9/19 760 - 162711 - 643100 -00000 0.00 4.016.46 0.00 4,016.46 20195- 154733SL 9/19 10043402 20195 - 113340 8/15 -9/17 441 - 256110 - 643100 -00000 0.00 926.76 0.00 926.76 20195. 113340 8/15 -9/17 10043402 20195 - 158280 8/20 -9/20 111. 156334 - 643100 -00000 0.00 54.24 0.00 54.24 20195 - 158280 8/20 -9/20 10043402 20195 - 154732 9/24 111 - 156334 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9,122.31 0.00 9,122.31 20195 - 154732 9/24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18,531.67 CHECK NO 559106 VENDOR 201910 LELY STABLES 10043086 17887 001- 155410. 634999 -00000 0.00 155.00 0.00 155.00 59380 HORSE CARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 155.00 CHECK NO 558916 VENDOR 11240 LEO'S SOD & LANDSCAPING 10042410 22982 111 - 163645. 646314 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 79.80 100818 SOD 10042527 6379 322 - 183825 - 646320 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 79.80 107100 SOD 10042410 22997 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 79.80 100818 SOD 10042410 22885 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 79.80 100818 SOD OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043075 6427 111 - 156332 - 646314 -00000 0.00 984.00 0.00 107343 SOD 10042410 22886 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 159.60 0.00 100818 SOD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558963 VENDOR 105260 LESCO SERVICE CENTER 10042528 2B21O0 109 - 182901 - 652310 -00000 0.00 245.00 0.00 102101 CHELATED IRON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559412 VENDOR 343480 LILIANA CARRENDER 10043169 9/20/01 4 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 52.00 0.00 CARRENDER 9/20/01 4 HRS 10043169 9/21/01 5 -1/2 HRS 681 - 431590- 634402 -00000 0.00 71.50 0.00 CARRENDER 9/21/01 5 -1/2 HRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559450 VENDOR 900030 - LINDA CHAPMAN 212715 2/2,5/18 TRAVEL L.CHAPMAN 001 - 156140 - 640200 -00000 0.00 11.60 0.00 2/2,5/18 TRAVEL L.CHAPMAN 212716 4/3 TRAVEL L.CHAPMAN 001- 156140 - 640300 -00000 0.00 17.60 0.00 4/3 TRAVEL L.CHAPMAN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559426 VENDOR 344080 - LINDA FASULO 10042669 4/2.8/20 TRVL L FASULO 001 - 156110 - 640200 -00000 0.00 89.90 0.00 4/2 -8/20 TRVL L FASULO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559471 VENDOR 900050 - LISA NICHOLS 212726 REFUND PARKS NICHOLS 111 - 000000. 208901 -00000 0.00 1.80 0.00 REFUND PARKS NICHOLS 212725 REFUND PARKS NICHOLS 111 - 156313 - 347911.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 REFUND PARKS NICHOLS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559179 VENDOR 255940 - LORENZO WALKER INSTITUTE OF 10043166 T RIVERA - TRAINING 111 - 156381 - 654360 -00000 0.00 116.00 0.00 59403 T RIVERA TRAINING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559418 VENDOR 343780 - LORIN CLEMENTS 10043301 INTERVIEW EXP - CLEMENTS 114 - 178975- 640310 -00000 0.00 951.28 0.00 107739 INTERVIEW EXP CLEMENTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559379 VENDOR 339110 LUXAM, INC. 10043084 1268 198 - 157430 - 634999.00000 0.00 350.00 0.00 59356 WINDOW TRTMT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559072 VENDOR 174240 LUZ PIETRI 10043090 PETTY CASH 001 - 156145 - 641950 -00000 0.00 34.00 001 - 156145 - 652990 -00000 0.00 32.59 001 - 156150- 641950 -00000 0.00 4.30 001. 156150- 651110 -00000 0.00 23.92 001. 156150 - 652990 -00000 0.00 29.37 001- 156160 - 641950 -00000 0.00 6.80 001 - 156160. 651110 -00000 0.00 4.00 001 - 156160 - 652990 -00000 0.00 58.79 001 - 156180 - 652990 -00000 0.00 16.31 0.00 PETTY CASH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559356 VENDOR 332820 LYNN CLARKE 10042792 9/6 -25 TRVL L CLARKE 111 - 156341 - 640200 -00000 0.00 10.15 0.00 9/6 -25 TRVL L CLARKE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559020 VENDOR 141870 M. JEAN RAWSON 10042634 SERVICES 4/01 111 - 138911. 634999 -00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 100505 - SERVICES FOR 4/01 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559472 VENDOR 900050 MALENA CINTRON 212734 REFUND PARKS CINTRON 670 - 000000. 220001 -00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 REFUND PARKS CINTRON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558957 VENDOR 100800 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 10042279 56239426 473 - 173411 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,924.40 0.00 105113 TEMP HELP 10042629 56239408 001 - 126334 - 646311 -00000 0.00 612.00 0.00 101601 - TEMP HELP 10042734 56239435 111 - 163646 - 649990 -00000 0.00 410.01 0.00 106309 TEMP HELP 10042279 56239344 473. 173411- 634999 -00000 0.00 1,174.46 0.00 105113 TEMP HELP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559246 VENDOR 285890 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 10042645 56238750 408 - 210151 - 634999.00000 0.00 470.00 0.00 104696 - TEMPORARY HELP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559387 VENDOR 340050 - MAP SUPPLY INC. 10042292 02498 101 - 163630- 652990 -00000 0.00 139.93 0.00 58727 - PURCHASE OF ATLAS MAPS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559257 VENDOR 290630 MAP SUPPLY INCORPORATED 10042300 02455 490 - 144610 - 652720 -00000 0.00 950.00 0.00 106896 - MAPS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559269 VENDOR 298490 MARC INDUSTRIES - TRANSCOM USA 10042162 3212490042 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 48.70 0.00 100105 PARTS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 93 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042162 3212530050 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 86.10 0.00 86.10 100105 PARTS 10042162 321540024 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 359.95 0.00 359.95 100105 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 494.75 CHECK NO 559209 VENDOR 267060 - MARCIA GALLE 10042735 9/5- 9/28/01 DANCE INSTR 111 - 156390 - 634999 -00000 0.00 826.15 0.00 826.15 107566 9/5- 9/28/01 DANCE INSTRUCTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 826.15 CHECK NO 558917 VENDOR 11590 - MARCO ACE HARDWARE 10042639 220184 001. 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 3.38 0.00 3.38 100669 SUPPLIES 10042639 220184 001- 156363 - 652910 -00000 0.00 54.99 0.00 54.99 100669 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 58.37 CHECK NO 559204 VENDOR 264860 MARCO ISLAND FILM FESTIVAL 10043408 CC090101 194. 101540- 882100 -10298 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 2.000.00 105573 - 8/26- 9/14/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.000.00 CHECK NO 559002 VENDOR 127090 MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 10042563 109040577 001 - 121710 - 651110 -00000 0.00 52.56 0.00 52.56 100303 SUPPLIES 10042566 108240521 490 - 144610 - 651110 -00000 0.00 2.56- 0.00 2.56- 100069 SUPPLIES 10042628 108300637 001 - 010510 - 651110.00000 0.00 416.41 0.00 416.41 100779 - SUPPLIES 10042628 108010556 001 - 010510 - 651110 -00000 0.00 186.37 0.00 186.37 100779 - SUPPLIES 10042152 109040569 113 - 138931 - 651110 -00000 0.00 11.52 0.00 11.52 101429 SUPPLIES 10042628 108160572 001. 010510- 651110 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 100779 - SUPPLIES 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042139 109050559 001. 138710- 651110 -00000 0.00 243.14 0.00 100398 SUPPLIES 10042627 107300535 111 - 138911 - 649990.00000 0.00 27.10 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES 10042921 1008070528 001 - 156110. 651110 -00000 0.00 70.56 0.00 100928 SUPPLIES 10042571 109130504 521 - 122410. 651110 -00000 0.00 12.14 0.00 100106 - SUPPLIES 10043144 107160564 001. 156130 - 651110 -00000 0.00 42.64 0.00 100928 - SUPPLIES 10042628 108240578 001 - 010510- 651110 -00000 0.00 17.98 0.00 100779 - SUPPLIES 10042567 108310655 111 - 138313 - 651110 -00000 0.00 232.24 0.00 SUPPLIES 10041166 108240549 521 - 122450 - 651110 -00000 0.00 30.10 0.00 100106 SUPPLIES 10042924 108270513 408 - 210120 - 651110 -00000 0.00 249.14 0.00 101592 SUPPLIES 10043143 101230626 001. 157110 - 652990 -00000 0.00 28.30 0.00 100421 SUPPLIES 10043143 105210570 001- 157110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 79.30 0.00 100421 SUPPLIES 10042140 109040687 (CREDIT) 001 - 157110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 51.45- 0.00 100421 - SUPPLIES 10042926 108230540 408 - 233312 - 651110.00000 0.00 117.43 0.00 101090 SUPPLIES 10042145 109050711 001 - 010110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 10.84- 0.00 100621 CREDIT 10043144 107070505 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 319.96 0.00 100928 - SUPPLIES 10040555 108230599 123 - 155967 - 651110 -33067 0.00 25.00 0.00 059334 SUPPLIES 10042157 103260606 001 - 144210 - 651110.00000 0.00 70.53 0.00 1 100948 - SUPPLIES 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042924 108290509 408 - 210120 - 651110 -00000 0.00 143.03 0.00 101592 SUPPLIES 10042690 108300517 111 - 156341 - 651110 -00000 0.00 19.54 0.00 100868 SUPPLIES 10043143 101220585 001 - 157110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 119.37 0.00 100421 SUPPLIES 10042566 108170530 490 - 144610 - 651110 -00000 0.00 496.17 0.00 100069 SUPPLIES 10042144 109070581 001- 100110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 76.50 0.00 100680 SUPPLIES 10042918 108290682 408- 210130 - 651110 -00000 0.00 1.23 0.00 101425 SUPPLIES 10042591 108310525 408 - 210151 - 651110 -00000 0.00 113.18 0.00 101032 SUPPLIES 10042925 109110619 116 - 121830- 651110 -33297 0.00 135.30- 0.00 102820 SUPPLIES 10041409 108310626 001. 144110- 651110 -00000 0.00 45.10 0.00 100594 SUPPLIES 10042147 109060039 001 - 156363 - 651110 -00000 0.00 5.48 0.00 100655 SUPPLIES 10043143 11300521 001 - 157110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 26.67 0.00 100421 SUPPLIES 10042564 108160686 101 - 163646 - 651110.00000 0.00 50.98 0.00 100305 SUPPLIES 10042153 109060628 113 - 138900 - 651110 -00000 0.00 859.39 0.00 101450 SUPPLIES 10042140 109060700 001 - 157110- 651110 -00000 0.00 106.16 0.00 100421 - SUPPLIES 10043144 102280738 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 15.28- 0.00 100928 - SUPPLIES 10042918 108310506 408 - 210130- 651110 -00000 0.00 18.16 0.0c 101425 SUPPLIES 10042686 106280594 001 - 155230 - 651110 -00000 0.00 7.80- 0.0c 100770 SUPPLIES P 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042923 109250609 490 - 144618 - 651110 -00000 0.00 5.56- 0.00 101842 SUPPLIES 10042627 109070521 111 - 138911 - 649990 -00000 0.00 474.78 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES 10042627 104090056 111 - 138911 - 649990 -00000 0.00 366.81 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES 10042684 108120547 408 - 233352 - 651110 -00000 0.00 3.09- 0.00 100530 SUPPLIES 10042917 109060714 492 - 144641. 651110 -00000 0.00 16.47 0.00 100069 SUPPLIES 10042151 109070568 001 - 144210 - 651110 -00000 0.00 92.16 0.00 100948 SUPPLIES 10042628 108030707 001 - 010510. 651110 -00000 0.00 126.00- 0.00 100779 - SUPPLIES 10042569 109070554 001 - 138710. 651110 -00000 0.00 48.07 0.00 100398 SUPPLIES 10043144 102160666 001 - 156160 - 651110 -00000 0.00 1.385.20 0.00 100928 - SUPPLIES 10042143 109040527 001 - 000000 - 142500 -00000 0.00 135.30 0.00 100647 SUPPLIES 10042628 1085030669 001. 010510- 651110 -00000 0.00 102.00 0.00 100779 - SUPPLIES 10042566 109240598 490 - 144610- 651110 -00000 0.00 4.51- 0.00 100069 SUPPLIES 10042627 107310667 111 - 138911 - 649990 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES 10043144 107160564 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 729.10 0.00 100928 - SUPPLIES 10042571 109040675 521 - 122410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 100106 - SUPPLIES 10042921 108100631 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 47.36 0.00 100928 SUPPLIES 10042627 108160552 111 - 138911 - 649990 -00000 0.00 73.92 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 97 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042140 109060698 001 - 157110. 651110 -00000 0.00 9.77 0.00 9.77 100421 - SUPPLIES 10042564 108140649 101. 163646 - 651110 -00000 0.00 24.64 0.00 24.64 100305 SUPPLIES 10042153 109050512 113 - 138900. 651110.00000 0.00 59.64 0.00 59.64 101450 SUPPLIES 10042628 107270618 001 - 010510 - 651110 -00000 0.00 7.65 0.00 7.65 100779 - SUPPLIES 10043144 107250702 001 - 156150 - 651110 -00000 0.00 964.52 0.00 964.52 100928 - SUPPLIES 10042691 109070510 198 - 157410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 3.47 0.00 3.47 10120 SUPPLIES 10043143 104270537 001 - 157110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 120.57 0.00 120.57 100421 SUPPLIES 10042628 108220525 001 - 010510 - 651110 -00000 0.00 305.00 0.00 305.00 100779 - SUPPLIES 10042919 109060516 101 - 163612 - 651110 -00000 0.00 12.86 0.00 12.86 104394 SUPPLIES 10042591 101220700 408 - 210151 - 651110 -00000 0.00 250.00 0.00 250.00 101032 SUPPLIES 10042141 109070538 111 - 138317 - 651110 -00000 0.00 122.22 0.00 122.22 100447 SUPPLIES 10042927 101230700 001. 121152 - 651110 -00000 0.00 2.77 0.00 2.77 101157 SUPPLIES 10042146 10905043 101- 163630- 651110 -00000 0.00 113.96 0.00 113.96 100803 SUPPLIES 10043143 101220585 001 - 157110 - 652990 -00000 0.00 187.08 0.00 187.08 100421 SUPPLIES 10041166 108310584 521 - 122410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 188.76 0.00 188.76 100106 SUPPLIES 10042925 109060695 116 - 121830 - 651110 -33297 0.00 427.86 0.00 427.86 102820 SUPPLIES 10042683 109050617 114 - 178975 - 651110 -00000 0.00 13.58 0.00 13.58 100491 SUPPLIES 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042569 109060540 001. 138710- 651110 -00000 0.00 30.56 0.00 100398 SUPPLIES 10041409 109060567 001 - 144110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 70.56 0.00 100594 SUPPLIES 10042148 109070605 001 - 122240 - 651110 -00000 0.00 120.54 0.00 100015 SUPPLIES 10042154 109040570 408 - 253211. 651110 -00000 0.00 53.85 0.00 101628 SUPPLIES 10042565 108270658 001. 121710- 651110 -00000 0.00 17.15 0.00 100303 SUPPLIES 10042923 101020648 490. 144618 - 651110 -00000 0.00 56.55 0.00 101842 SUPPLIES 10042627 108100581 111 - 138911 - 649990 -00000 0.00 9$.98 0.00 , 101351 - SUPPLIES 10042627 106070713 111 - 138911 - 649990 -00000 0.00 61.95- 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES 10042685 108300575 001 - 010110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 66.25 0.00 100621 SUPPLIES 10042917 109050556 492 - 144641 - 651110 -00000 0.00 276.53 0.00 100069 SUPPLIES 10042688 108230644 111. 156380- 651110 -00000 0.00 134.93 0.00 100883 SUPPLIES 10042570 109060668 101 - 163610 - 651110 -00000 0.00 186.14 0.00 100475 SUPPLIES 10043144 10720528 001 - 156145 - 651110 -00000 0.00 430.52 0.00 100928 - SUPPLIES 10043144 12220550 001 - 156110 - 651110.00000 0.00 2.52 0.00 100928 - SUPPLIES 10042920 108060629 113 - 138323 - 651110 -00000 0.00 1,483.45 0.00 105567 SUPPLIES 10042591 109070622 408 - 210151 - 651110 -00000 0.00 84.09 0.00 101032 SUPPLIES 10042142 109060592 111 - 156332 - 651110 -00000 0.00 125.17 0.00 100600 SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 31.84 0.00 5.56- SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10043143 101230626 001 - 157110- 652990 -00000 0.00 100421 SUPPLIES 10043143 101230626 001 - 157110 - 652990.00000 0.00 100421 SUPPLIES 10042689 109060671 490 - 144618 - 651110 -00000 0.00 101842 SUPPLIES 10042628 108150574 001. 010510- 651110 -00000 0.00 100779 - SUPPLIES 10042924 109100511 408 - 210120 - 651110 -00000 0.00 101592 SUPPLIES 10042627 108310637 111 - 138911. 649990 -00000 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES 10042149 108310511 111 - 156349 - 651110.00000 0.00 100881 SUPPLIES 10042137 109070628 408 - 210105 - 651110 -00000 0.00 100240 - SUPPLIES 10042565 108290505 001 - 121710 - 651110 -00000 0.00 100303 SUPPLIES 10042155 109050548 001 - 178985 - 651110 -00000 0.00 103130 SUPPLIES 10042692 109040673 408- 253212. 651110 -00000 0.00 100224 SUPPLIES 10042628 108300717 001 - 010510 - 651110.00000 0.00 100779 - SUPPLIES 10042684 108270621 408 - 233352 - 651110.00000 0.00 100530 SUPPLIES 10042569 109120710 001- 138710 - 651110 -00000 0.00 100398 SUPPLIES 10042627 108100676 111 - 138911- 649990 -00000 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES 10043144 107090616 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 100928 - SUPPLIES 10042922 106110026 001 - 432020. 651110 -00000 0.00 102719 SUPPLIES 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 16.92 0.00 31.84 0.00 5.56- 0.00 63.86 24.06- 284.81 27.54 87.29 50.00 85.23 64.30 5.16- 53.86 18.10- 22.40 39.75 199.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 99 VCHR NET 16.92 31.84 5.56- 63.86 24.06- 284.81 27.54 87.29 50.00 85.23 64.30 5.16- 53.86 18.10- 22.40 39.75 199.99 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042627 107300523 111. 138911- 649990 -00000 0.00 42.13 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES 10042591 104110531 408- 210151 - 651110 -00000 0.00 305.46 0.00 101032 SUPPLIES 10042628 108090688 001 - 010510 - 651110 -00000 0.00 811.87 0.00 100779 - SUPPLIES 10042569 109060654 001 - 138710. 651110 -00000 0.00 18.24 0.00 100398 SUPPLIES 10042591 101220527 408. 210151 - 651110 -00000 0.00 154.68 0.00 101032 SUPPLIES 10040555 108230599 001 - 155910. 651110 -00000 0.00 44.38 0.00 101009 SUPPLIES 10042138 109050562 518 - 121630. 654360 -00000 0.00 14.99 0.00 100379 - SUPPLIES 10042150 108230535 111 - 156390 - 651110 -00000 0.00 43.84 0.00 100889 SUPPLIES 10042156 109060596 118- 144210 - 652990 -33791 0.00 169.89 0.00 105828 SUPPLIES 10042627 106050583 111- 138911 - 649990 -00000 0.00 63.72 0.00 101351 - SUPPLIES 10042569 109110555 001 - 138710 - 651110 -00000 0.00 136.66 0.00 100398 SUPPLIES 10042591 108290695 408 - 210151- 651110 -00000 0.00 616.65 0.00 101032 SUPPLIES 10042138 109070621 518- 121630- 654360 -00000 0.00 73.34 0.00 100379 - SUPPLIES 10043144 107130510 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 65.20- 0.00 100928 - SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559504 VENDOR 900080 - MARGUERITE CONNELLY 212758 AMB REF CONNELLY 6/7/00 490- 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 62.57 0.00 AMB REF CONNELLY 0021955 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 101 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02. 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 559473 VENDOR 900050 MARIA G LUCID 212778 REFUND PARKS LUCID 670 - 000000. 220010 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 LUCID REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 558990 VENDOR 122850 MARIA G. DELASHMET 10043325 9/25/01 6 HRS 681. 431590. 634402 -00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 9/25/01 6 HRS DELASHMET 10043325 9/25/01 6 HRS 681 - 421190- 634402.00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 9/25/01 6 HRS DELASHMET 10043325 9/24/01 7 HRS 681- 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 112.00 0.00 112.00 9/24/01 7 HRS DELASHMET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 208.00 CHECK NO 559505 VENDOR 900080 - MARIE FINKBEINER 212757 AMB REF FINKBEINER2 /28/01 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 335.00 0.00 335.00 AMB REF FINKBEINER 0114759.1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 335.00 CHECK NO 559451 VENDOR 900030 - MARILYN HAMACHECK 212717 9/20 TRAVEL M HAMACHECK 517- 121640 - 640300 -00000 0.00 15.28 0.00 15.28 9/20 TRAVEL M HAMACHECK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.28 CHECK NO 558920 VENDOR 11860 - MARILYN MATTHES 10042670 6/29 -9/25 TRVL M MATTHES 001 - 156110 - 640300 -00000 0.00 209.35 0.00 209.35 6/29 -9/25 TRVL M MATTHES 10042666 2/21 -9/24 TRVL M MATTHES 001 - 156110 - 640200 -00000 0.00 90.77 0.00 90.77 2/21- 9/24/01 TRVL M MATTHES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 300.12 CHECK NO 559007 VENDOR 130890 - MARILYN NORRIS 10043382 8/3 TRVL M NORRIS 001 - 156110 - 640300 -00000 0.00 12.38 0.00 12.38 8/3 TRVL M NORRIS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 12.38 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559199 VENDOR 261580 - MARK MIDDLEBROOK 10042451 9/4 -6 TRVL M.MIDDLEBROOK 681 - 421510 - 640300 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 9/4 -6 TRAVEL M.MIDDLEBROOK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559219 VENDOR 272890 - MARKETRONICS, INC. 10042297 071328 408 - 233351 - 641950 -00000 0.00 4.11 0.00 106790 ELEMENT /FREGHT 10042297 071328 408. 233351 - 652910 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 106790 ELEMENT /FREGHT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559275 VENDOR 300390 - MARY & JIMMY'S BAIL BONDS 10043297 BOND ESTREATURE OBRIEN 001- 431510 - 351100 -00000 0.00 760.00 0.00 BOND ESTREATURE OBRIEN 99.5914 10043289 J,ELLSWICK O1.702MMA 001 - 431510 - 351100.00000 0.00 950.00 0.00 07/10/01 J,ELLSWICK 01- 702MMA 10043289 K,FLEMISTER 00- 2266CFA 001 - 431510- 351100 -00000 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 05/11/01 K,FLEMISTER 00- 2266CFA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559377 VENDOR 338870 - MARY BALSIERO 10043380 9/8 -25 TRVL M BALSEIRO 001- 156130 - 640200 -00000 0.00 40.31 0.00 9/8 -25 TRVL M BALSEIRO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559030 VENDOR 148280 - MARY CORNELISSE 10042521 PETTY CASH 114 - 178975 - 640200 -00000 0.00 1.50 114 - 178975. 652990 -00000 0.00 1.39 114 - 178975. 652910 -00000 0.00 8.34 0.00 PETTY CASH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559042 VENDOR 160610 - MARY ELLEN DONNER 10042461 9/1 -26 TRVL MARY DONNER 111. 156313- 640200 -00000 0.00 47.56 0.00 9/1 -26 TRAVEL MARY DONNER 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559124 VENDOR 224910 - MASUNE COMPANY 10042290 640311 111 - 156395 - 652720 -00000 0.00 343.69 0.00 55323 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 10042290 647200 111 - 156395 - 652720 -00000 0.00 8.75 0.00 55323 MEDICAL SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558918 VENDOR 11640 MATTHEW BENDER 10043047 12705349 355. 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 62.16 0.00 58758 BOOK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559357 VENDOR 333100 MATTHEW BENDER 10042640 2550841 001- 443010- 654110 -00000 0.00 68.60 0.00 104743 - REFERECE MATERIAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558919 VENDOR 11700 - MATULAYS CONTRACTORS SUPPLY 10042747 A13838 313 - 163673 - 763100 -66066 0.00 834.40- 0.00 100351 CREDIT 10042747 A20722 313 - 163673 - 763100.66066 0.00 56.60- 0.00 100351 CREDIT 10042747 58034 313 - 163673 - 763100.66066 0.00 3,302.92 0.00 100351 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559506 VENDOR 900080 - MCARE ADMIN OFFICE REFUND DEPT 212756 AMB REF MATTLER 3/25/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 5.29 0.00 AMB REF MATTLER 0117664 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558923 VENDOR 12200 - MCCONNELLS TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 10042289 160759 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 9.58 0.00 105640 - SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 104 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042287 160169 001. 156363. 652990 -00000 0.00 3.59 0.00 3.59 100636 SUPPLIES 10042289 160934 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.89 105640 SUPPLIES 10042286 160588 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 66.55 0.00 66.55 100531 SUPPLIES 10042289 160730 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 20.67 0.00 20.67 105640 SUPPLIES 10042285 160809 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 61.98 0.00 61.98 100590 SUPPLIES 10042285 160672 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 35.06 0.00 35.06 100590 SUPPLIES 10042287 160389 001. 156363- 652990 -00000 0.00 8.34 0.00 8.34 100636 SUPPLIES 10042289 160808 001 - 122240. 652990 -00000 0.00 15.28 0.00 15.28 105640 SUPPLIES 10042745 160474 111 - 156313 - 652990.00000 0.00 60.85 0.00 60.85 101221 SUPPLIES 10042283 160902 408 - 253212 - 652990.00000 0.00 56.38 0.00 56.38 100225 SUPPLIES 10042289 160828 001. 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 4.03 0.00 4.03 105640 SUPPLIES 10042281 160853 113 - 138915- 652990 -00000 0.00 26.12 0.00 26.12 104128 SUPPLIES 10042285 160821 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 21.38 0.00 21.38 100590 SUPPLIES 10042289 160690 001 - 122240 - 652987.00000 0.00 32.52 0.00 32.52 105640 SUPPLIES 10042289 160941 001 - 122240- 652990 -00000 0.00 4.84 0.00 4.84 105640 SUPPLIES 10042285 160330 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 34.33 0.00 34.33 100590 SUPPLIES 10042289 160940 001 - 122240. 652990 -00000 0.00 2.33 0.00 2.33 105640 SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042285 160005 100590 SUPPLIES 10042289 160990 105640 SUPPLIES 10042284 160848 100352 SUPPLIES 10042289 160109 105640 SUPPLIES 10042285 160747 100590 SUPPLIES 10042289 160587 105640 SUPPLIES 10042287 160654 100636 SUPPLIES 10042289 160110 (CREDIT) 105640 SUPPLIES (CREDIT) 10042286 160686 100531 SUPPLIES 10042289 160699 105640 SUPPLIES 10042289 160948 105640 SUPPLIES 10042285 160809 100590 SUPPLIES 10042637 159781 59214 OPERATING EQUIPMENT 10042289 160970 105640 SUPPLIES 10042284 160714 100352 SUPPLIES 10042282 160591 100911 SUPPLIES 10042285 160747 100590 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 40.92 0.00 001 - 122240 - 652987 -00000 0.00 20.91 0.00 101. 163620- 652990 -00000 0.00 494.80 0.00 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 33.84 0.00 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 20.63 0.00 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 8.44 0.00 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 34.99 0.00 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 33.84- 0.00 408. 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 17.61 0.00 001. 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 56.64 0.00 001 - 122240 - 652987 -00000 0.00 26.09 0.00 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 16.18 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 363.64 001 - 155410 - 652990.00000 0.00 135.60 0.00 001 - 122240 - 652987 -00000 0.00 6.98 0.00 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 24.28 0.00 408 - 233351 - 652910 -00000 0.00 5.38 0.00 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 62.23 0.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 106 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,800.04 CHECK NO 559024 VENDOR 144810 MCMASTER -CARR 10042756 4615504 408. 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 52.67 0.00 52.67 102588 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52.67 CHECK NO 559507 VENDOR 900080 MEDICARE PART B FINANCIAL SERVICES 212753 AMB REF JOY 3/16/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 24.70 0.00 24.70 AMB REF JOY 0116635 -2 212755 AMB REF MORRIS 3/16/01 490- 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 239.27 0.00 239.27 AMB REF MORRIS 0116584 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 263.97 CHECK NO 559437 VENDOR 344330 - METAL SAMPLES COMPANY 10042769 65406 408 - 253250 - 652990 -00000 0.00 329.00 0.00 329.00 57463 TESTING KITS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 329.00 CHECK NO. 559110 VENDOR 204140 - METCALF & EDDY INC. 10043007 78437 -A 411 - 273511 - 631400 -70054 0.00 62.91 0.00 62.91 917436 THRU 12/31/01 10043388 101495 411 - 273511 - 631400 -70054 0.00 22,517.47 0.00 22,517.47 917436 THRU 6/29/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 22,580.38 CHECK NO 559508 VENDOR 900080 - MICHELE VENTURA 212759 AMB REF VENTURA 6/27/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 AMB REF VENTURA 0126187 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 CHECK NO 559326 VENDOR 323000 - MICHELLE DORALUS 10043324 9/25/01 3 HRS 681 - 421190- 634402 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 9/25/01 3 HRS DORALUS 10043324 9/23/01 6 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 96.00 0.00 96.00 9/23/01 6 HRS DORALUS OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 107 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043324 9/20/01 6 HRS 681- 431590. 634402 -00000 0.00 96.00 0.00 96.00 9/20/01 6 HRS DORALUS 10043324 9/17/01 4 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 24.00 681. 431590- 634402 -00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 64.00 9/17/01 4 HRS DORALUS 10043324 9/25/01 3 HRS 681 - 431590- 634402 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 9/25/01 3 HRS DORALUS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 304.00 CHECK NO 558924 VENDOR 12420 MID CONTINENT ELECTRIC 10043298 3962 313 - 163673 - 763100 -66065 0.00 19,498.00 0.00 19.498.00 101587 SVS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 19,498.00 CHECK NO 559242 VENDOR 283970 MIKE JONES 10042463 8/29/01 OPS TRAINING CLSS 114- 178970 - 654360 -00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 50273 - 8/29/01 OPS TRAINING CLASS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400.00 CHECK NO 558965 VENDOR 106140 - MILLIPORE CORP. 10042633 2917777 114 - 178975- 764990 -00000 0.00 2,419.00 114 - 178975- 641950.00000 0.00 49.93 0.00 2.468.93 107136 - CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,468.93 CHECK NO 559183 VENDOR 256580 MINOLTA CORPORATION 10042304 A101962383 001 - 155230 - 646710 -00000 0.00 23.50 0.00 23.50 100768 - MAINTENANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 23.50 CHECK NO 559003 VENDOR 129260 MITCHELL & STARK CONSTRUCTION 10043008 #1 (RETAINAGE) 325 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 9,217.40- 0.00 9,217.40- 106024 7/15/01 THRU 8/10/01 10043008 #1 325 - 172984 - 763120.31801 0.00 92,174.00 0.00 92.174.00 106024 7/15/01 THRU 8/10/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 82,956.60 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559154 VENDOR 245150 MITRON SYSTEMS CORPORATION 10042753 MSC 3779 001- 156363 - 646970 -00000 0.00 181.60 0.00 104547 PARTS /REPAIRS 10042753 MSC 3772 001- 156363 - 646970 -00000 0.00 108.00 0.00 104547 PARTS /REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558925 VENDOR 12900 MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORP 10042749 859 271 0787 5/01 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 721.73 0.00 100107 FUEL 5/01 10042749 859 271 0787 5/01 521. 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 613.38 0.00 100107 FUEL 5/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559447 VENDOR 344500 MONA BUTTER 10042804 6/27 TRVL M BUTLER 001 - 156140 - 640300 -00000 0.00 11.60 0.00 6/2 TRVL M BUTLER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559317 VENDOR 319710 MOWERS INC 10042770 30452 408 - 233313 - 652990.00000 0.00 168.84 0.00 57950 SUPPLIES FOR MOWER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558988 VENDOR 122330 - MULLER'S TACK & TOG SHOPPE 10042768 30501 001 - 156363 - 652255 -00000 0.00 59.00 0.00 58740 NATURAL GLOW SUPPLEMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558926 VENDOR 13000 - MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & SIGN CO 10042632 074461 101 - 163630 - 653710 -00000 0.00 3.573.00 0.00 100808 - SUPPLIES 10042785 074577 111 - 178980 - 634999.33880 0.00 1,668.00 0.00 106930 SIGN MATERIAL 10042740 074579 101 - 163630 - 653710 -00000 0.00 474.00 0.00 107335 SIGN SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 109 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042636 074339 001 - 156363 - 646316 -00000 0.00 553.25 0.00 553.25 106998 - LETTERS FOR SIGNS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,268.25 CHECK NO 559098 VENDOR 195160 MYRON MANUFACTURING CORPORATION 10043323 6219984 / 34770685 408 - 233352 - 652990 -00000 0.00 435.13 0.00 435.13 59431 PENS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 435.13 CHECK NO 559012 VENDOR 134940 N & N ASSOCIATES, INC. 10042635 4167 408 - 233352 - 652990.00000 0.00 737.51 0.00 737.51 102260 - SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 737.51 CHECK NO 558985 VENDOR 118880 NABORS, GIBLIN, & NICKERSON, P.A. 10043376 001 00000 9191 GTS 001. 010520 - 631100 -00000 0.00 9,165.85 0.00 9,165.85 107867 8/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,165.85 CHECK NO 558927 VENDOR 13030 NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY 10043147 AIRPORT RD SAFETY IMPRVMT 313 - 163673. 763100 -00000 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 107824 - AIRPORT RD SAFETY IMPROVEMT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100,000.00 CHECK NO 558928 VENDOR 13080 - NAPLES ARMATURE WORKS 10041701 61080 109 - 182901. 652990 -00000 0.00 407.15 0.00 407.15 58816 - EQUIPMENT PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 407.15 CHECK NO 559192 VENDOR 259460 - NAPLES COURT REPORTING, INC. 10042630 6848 681 - 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 L.JAMES 01 -601 10042630 6875 681 - 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 J. THOMPSON 01 -143 10042630 T -2377 681 - 410310. 633022 -00000 0.00 92.00 0.00 92.00 F. ROBINSON 00 -605 OCTOBER 02. 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 110 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042630 6851 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 T.PRICE 01 -1006 10042776 4860 681. 410310 - 633033 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 PAREDES 99 9381 10042630 6963 681. 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 L.PAZ 01- 001238 10042630 6598 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 B.HADDAD 01 -670 10042630 6671 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 M.SCHWEDERSKY 01 -846 10042646 6939 681 - 410310 - 633033 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 S.HENDERSON 00.1300 10042630 6878 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 K.PULVER 01 -1073 10042630 6874 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 C.SCOTT 01 -475 10042630 6867 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 B.LESTOCK 01 -293 10042630 6674 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 M.SCHWEDERSKY 01 -846 10042630 T -1133 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 M.GIBBONS 00 -389 10042630 6925 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 J.BENITEZ 00.02854 10042630 6840 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 B.DAVIES 01 -30 10042776 T -2358 681. 410310 - 633023 -00000 0.00 243.80 0.00 243.80 S RIVERA 00 01688 10042630 6920 681. 410310- 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 D.YOUNG 00- 002670 10042630 6847 681. 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 O.GONZALEZ 01.751 10042630 6856 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 W.CANADA 01 -805 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 111 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042646 6908 681. 410310 - 633033 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 F.PINEIRO 00 -2473 10042630 6942 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 G.GARCIA 00 -2201 10042776 6924 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 N ORTIZ O1 1397 10042630 T -2199 681- 410310- 633022 -00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 S.KNIGHT 96. 002280 10042630 6362 681 - 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 R.JANSSEN 01- 000567 10042630 6320 681 - 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 G.PRIDA 01 -521 10042630 6642 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 C.CARNRICK 091 - 000811 10042646 6552 681 - 410310 - 633033 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 DT 01- 046 -CJA 10042630 6892 681. 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 C.COBB 01- 001152 10042630 6898 681. 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 M.SANCHEZ 01 -00053 10042630 6871 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 B.DAVIES 01 -30 10042630 6891 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 D.YOUNG 00 -2670 10042630 6942 -1 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 195.50 0.00 195.50 G.GARCIA 00- 002201 10042776 6723 681 - 410310 - 633033 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 S HENDERSON 00 2738 10042630 6729.1 681. 410310- 633042 -00000 0.00 48.00 0.00 48.00 T. SAUNDERS 00 -2813 10042630 6793 681. 410310- 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 D.MOURIDAN 00.2885 10042646 6403 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 C.WEAVER 01 -628 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 558930 VENDOR 13300 NAPLES DAILY NEWS 10042761 1928691 495 - 192310 - 648160 -00000 0.00 101486 ADS 0.00 10042765 1935591 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 100480 ADVERTISING 0.00 10042765 1935590 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 100480 ADVERTISING 0.00 10042730 1935589 001 - 100130 - 649100 -00000 0.00 102611 AD 0.00 10042280 1935596 001 - 100130 - 648160 -00000 0.00 102611 - ADS 0.00 10042763 1936394 126 - 138332 - 649100 -33202 0.00 106212 ADVERTISING 0.00 10042762 1935612 111. 138317 - 649100 -00000 0.00 100448 ADVERTISING 0.00 10042764 1936280 101 - 163610 - 649100 -00000 0.00 100469 LEGAL AD 0.00 10042280 1935595 001 - 100130 - 648160 -00000 0.00 102611 - ADS 0.00 10042762 1936380 111 - 138317- 649100.00000 0.00 100448 ADVERTISING 0.00 10042761 1933937 495 - 192310 - 648160 -00000 101486 ADS 10042638 1934547 111 - 138911 - 649100 -00000 59209 - LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT 10042763 1936393 126 - 138332 - 649100 -33202 106212 ADVERTISING 10042765 1935593 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 100480 ADVERTISING 10042762 1936334 111 - 138317- 649100.00000 100448 ADVERTISING 10042763 1936395 126 - 138332 - 649100 -33202 106212 ADVERTISING 16JI PAGE 112 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,845.30 0.00 25.88 0.00 25.88 0.00 211.81 0.00 211.81 0.00 254.20 0.00 254.20 0.00 90.92 0.00 90.92 0.00 2,007.00 0.00 2,007.00 0.00 45.39 0.00 45.39 0.00 45.39 0.00 45.39 0.00 172.56 0.00 172.56 0.00 267.60 0.00 267.60 0.00 45.39 0.00 45.39 0.00 24.98 0.00 24.98 0.00 122.32 0.00 122.32 0.00 45.39 0.00 45.39 0.00 161.57 0.00 161.57 0.00 112.90 0.00 112.90 0.00 40.68 0.00 40.68 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559342 VENDOR 326860 NAPLES DAILY NEWS 10042766 1936281 412 - 273511. 649100 -70066 0.00 241.64 0.00 59354 AD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558931 VENDOR 13330 NAPLES DAY SURGERY 10042302 L. CHELLO 9/10/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 845.00 0.00 107767 - L. CHELLO 9/10/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559431 VENDOR 344140 - NAPLES EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN LLC 10043036 A MENDO 5/13/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 124.80 0.00 59439 A MENDO 5/13/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559073 VENDOR 174250 - NAPLES ENGRAVING 10042305 9740 111 - 138911 - 652990 -00000 0.00 102.95 0.00 59000 - WALNUT PLAQUE W /NAME PLATES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558932 VENDOR 13370 - NAPLES FEED & SEED, INC. 10042540 17694 001 - 155410 - 652210 -00000 0.00 61.18 0.00 059211 FEED FOR ANIMALS 10043031 17659 001 - 155410 - 652210 -00000 0.00 5.99 0.00 101555 ANIMAL SUPPLIES 10042641 17645 001 - 156363 - 652255 -00000 0.00 86.40 0.00 101394 ANIMAL SUPPLIES 10042641 17643 001 - 156363 - 652255 -00000 0.00 36.80 0.00 101394 ANIMAL SUPPLIES 10042540 17624 001. 155410- 652210 -00000 0.00 45.78 0.00 059211 FEED FOR ANIMALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559068 VENDOR 172110 - NAPLES FUNERAL HOME CHECK NO 558968 VENDOR 107670 - NAPLES PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES 10043044 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 001 - 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.00 59434 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 156.00 CHECK NO 559432 VENDOR 344150 - NAPLES PLASTIC SURGERY 16JI PAGE 114 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET VOUCHER 10042303 J. WILSON 9/11/01 001. 155930 - 634150 -00000 0.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 107768 - J. WILSON 9/11/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 900.00 CHECK NO 559214 VENDOR 271100 - NAPLES HEART CENTER 10042787 7/14- 7/15/01 KODAK 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 162.50 0.00 162.50 7/14- 7/15/01 KODAK 107687 10042787 J SERRANO 6/28/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,511.25 0.00 1,511.25 107687 J SERRANO 6/28/01 10042787 7/11- 7/13/01 KODAK 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 1,202.50 0.00 1,202.50 7/11- 7/13/01 KODAK 107687 10042787 7/2/01 KODAK 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 107.25 0.00 107.25 7/2/01 KODAK 107687 10042787 7/11/01 KODAK 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,712.75 0.00 1,712.75 7/11/01 KODAK 107687 10042787 8/6/01 KODAK 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 71.50 0.00 71.50 8/6/01 KODAK 107687 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,767.75 CHECK NO 558933 VENDOR 13580 NAPLES LUMBER AND SUPPLY 10042299 164091 408. 233352- 652990 -00000 0.00 50.90 0.00 50.90 102257 - CONCRETE MIX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.90 CHECK NO 558971 VENDOR 108550 NAPLES MEDICAL CENTER 10043046 L CONLEY 9/6/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 60.45 0.00 60.45 59424 L CONLEY 9/6/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.45 CHECK NO 558968 VENDOR 107670 - NAPLES PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES 10043044 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 001 - 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.00 59434 C FERNANDEZ 8/22/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 156.00 CHECK NO 559432 VENDOR 344150 - NAPLES PLASTIC SURGERY 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042746 D HIGGINBOTHAM 7/18,24/01 001 - 155930 - 634101.00000 0.00 1,765.14 0.00 107841 D HIGGINBOTHAM 7/18,24/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558934 VENDOR 13700 - NAPLES RADIOLOGISTS 10043042 R RABASSA 8/30/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 78.00 0.00 59435 R RABASSA 8/30/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559316 VENDOR 319080 - NAPLES SAFARI ANIMAL HOSPITAL 10042642 22077 001 - 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 100977 - VET SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559408 VENDOR 343240 - NAPLES SHIPS STORE 10041700 9/6/01 SIGNAL HORN KIT 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 286.80 0.00 58605 - SIGNAL HORN KIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559268 VENDOR 297770 NAPLES SIGNS INC 10042298 3073 118- 144210. 652990 -33791 0.00 530.00 0.00 107693 - BANNER /SIGNS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559474 VENDOR 900050 NATALIA SOTELO 212736 REFUND -PARKS (N.SOTELO) 670 - 000000 - 220010 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 REFUND -PARKS (NATALIA SOTELO) CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559397 VENDOR 341780 NATIONAL DIAMOND 10042301 133856 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 889.00 0.00 107153 - BLADES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559305 VENDOR 315230 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSOCIATION - FLORIDA 10042533 09/30/01 S,CORNELISON 313 - 163611 - 654210 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 NOTARY ERRORS AND OMISSIONS INSURANC 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559218 VENDOR 272820 - NATIONS RENT OF FLORIDA, INC. 10041702 36- 703866 408 - 233351. 644600 -00000 0.00 147.50 0.00 100981 - EQUIPMENT RENATL 10042631 35- 701130 109 - 182901 - 644600 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 58825 - DELIVERY CHARGES 10042631 35- 101130 109 - 182901- 644600 -00000 0.00 1,250.00 0.00 107123 - RENT LIFT 10042631 400056114 (CREDIT) 109 - 182901 - 644600 -00000 0.00 50.00- 0.00 107123 - (CREDIT) CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559325 VENDOR 322510 - NATIONWIDE DATA SYSTEMS 10042291 9971019 001 - 172910 - 651110.00000 0.00 192.00 0.00 55752 - OFFICE SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559343 VENDOR 327990 - NCH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM 10042294 WWC0800 -1 408 - 233351 - 631230 -00000 0.00 550.00 0.00 103317 - HEALTH SERVICES 10042293 FPO #58103 EMP.VACCINES 408 - 233312 - 631230 -00000 0.00 330.00 0.00 58103 - VACCINES FOR EMPLOYEES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559021 VENDOR 143900 - NCH /CPR FUND 10041697 090801 001 - 122255 - 649010 -00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 58860 - FIRST AID CERTIFICATION RNWL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559160 VENDOR 248010 - NEUROSCIENCE & SPINE ASSOCIATION 10043041 R BURNS 9/12/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 87.75 0.00 59436 R BURNS 9/12/01 10043041 J MCDAVITT 9/7/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 126.10 0.00 59436 J MCDAVITT 9/7/01 1 6 J 1 PAGE 117 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043041 J MCDAVITT 9/11/01 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 152.75 0.00 152.75 59436 J MCDAVITT 9/11/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 366.60 CHECK NO 559227 VENDOR 278890 . NEWS -PRESS 10042296 0001614299 111 - 156332 - 648160 -00000 0.00 182.70 0.00 182.70 58737 - EMPLOYEE SEARCH ON -LINE AD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 182.70 CHECK NO 559248 VENDOR 286930 - NEXTEL 10042648 0002131764 -9 8/15- 9/14/01 001 - 121810 - 649990 -00000 0.00 113.76 0.00 113.76 59296 - 0002131764 -9 8/15- 9/14/01 10042643 00021702105 8/15- 9/14/01 516 - 121650 - 641700 -00000 0.00 209.85 0.00 209.85 102164 - 00021702105 8/15- 9/14/01 10042649 0001855146.5 8/15- 9/14/01 001 - 122240- 641700 -00000 0.00 394.21 0.00 394.21 59225 - 0001855146 -5 8/15- 9/14/01 10042643 00021702105 8/15- 9/14101 518 - 121630 - 641700 -00000 0.00 162.60 0.00 162.60 102164 - 00021702105 8/15- 9/14/01 10042732 0002179829 -3 8/15- 9/14/01 001 - 144510 - 641700.00000 0.00 50.94 0.00 50.94 101534 0002179829.3 8/15- 9/14/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 931.36 CHECK NO 559292 VENDOR 310560 - NORA SEHEULT 10043326 9/21/01 7 HRS 681. 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 112.00 0.00 112.00 9/21/01 7 HRS SEHEULT 10042647 9/11/01 2 HRS SEHEAULT 681- 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 9/11/01 2 HRS SEHEAULT 10043326 9/17/01 6 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 96.00 0.00 96.00 9/17/01 6 HRS SEHEULT 10042647 9/11/01 2 HRS SEHEAULT 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 9/11/01 2 HRS SEHEAULT 10043326 9/24/01 4 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402.00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 9/24/01 4 HRS SEHEULT 10043326 9/20/01 4 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 64.00 0.00 64.00 9/20/01 4 HRS SEHEULT 16JI PAGE 118 OCTOBER 02 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043326 9/24/01 681 - 421190.634402 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 9/24/01 SEHEULT 10043326 9/19/01 5 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 56.00 80.00 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 9/19/01 5 HRS SEHEULT 10043326 9/25/01 4 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 64.00 0.00 64.00 9/25/01 4 HRS SEHEULT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 512.00 CHECK NO 559509 VENDOR 900080 - NORA SHAFER 212760 AMB REF SHAFER 6/22/01 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 199.50 0.00 199.50 AMB REF SHAFER 0125753 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 199.50 CHECK NO 559475 VENDOR 900050 - NORMA MADAFFER 212735 REFUND -PARKS (N.MADAFFER) 111 - 156390 - 347290.00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 REFUND -PARKS (NORMA MADAFFER) CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400.00 CHECK NO 559155 VENDOR 245520 - NOVA INFO SYS 10042733 BANK FEE 8/01 490 - 144618 - 634999 -00000 0.00 76.69 111 - 156313.634999 -00000 0.00 269.60 111 - 156341 - 634999 -00000 0.00 132.55 130 - 157710 - 634999 -00000 0.00 79.25 111 - 156380. 634999 -00000 0.00 35.15 0.00 593.24 BANK FEE 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 593.24 CHECK NO 559048 VENDOR 162490 OFFICE DEPOT 10042288 188118406000 001 - 121148 - 651110 -00000 0.00 159.96 0.00 159.96 58883 - CD'S WRITERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 159.96 CHECK NO 559245 VENDOR 285590 OFFICE MAX 10042295 4960J249 118 - 144210 - 651910 -33791 0.00 399.99 0.00 399.99 57760 - OFFICE JET G55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 399.99 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559407 VENDOR 343230 - ONDEO DEGREMONT, INC. 10043299 5803 408 - 253211 - 655100 -00000 0.00 4.501.48 0.00 107671 CONNECTORS /TUBING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559039 VENDOR 157710 - ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC. 10042736 368655668 -01 111 - 156381 - 652990 -00000 0.00 211.04 0.00 101385 HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559406 VENDOR 343220 - PALM TREE SERVICE 10043114 163070 191 - 138785. 884100 -00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 35880600006 DELSA /CHERY 107480 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559347 VENDOR 330350 PAT'S PUMP AND BLOWER 10041994 301593 408. 233351 - 646510 -00000 0.00 42.75 0.00 104092 VACTOR PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559510 VENDOR 900080 PATRICIA ROCHE 212744 AMB REF P. ROCHE 4/24/01 490 - 000000- 116004.00000 0.00 335.00 0.00 AMB. REF. P. ROCHE 0120702 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559158 VENDOR 247350 - PEDERSEN PRINTING 10041090 1420 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 29.00 0.00 100799 BUS CARDS 10041090 1418 001. 000000- 142900 -00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 100799 BUS CARDS 10041090 1419 001 - 000000 - 142900.00000 0.00 38.00 0.00 100799 BUS CARDS 10040159 1417 113 - 138900- 647110 -00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 101539 - BUS CARDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559111 VENDOR 204950 PEEK TRAFFIC, INC. 10041194 43624 313 - 163673- 763100 -60172 0.00 13,629.00 0.00 106474 GROUP 6.300 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559405 VENDOR 342980 PELICAN MEDIA GROUP 10042469 #63 111 - 156341 - 634999.00000 0.00 620.00 0.00 107387 - POSTER DESIGN 10042675 #60 111 - 156341 - 648170 -00000 0.00 120.00 0.00 058688 1/2 PAGE AD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559034 VENDOR 152460 - PELUSO MOVERS INC. 10041091 8935 198 - 157430 - 634999.00000 0.00 220.00 0.00 102972 STOREAGE 8/8/01 10041092 8865 198. 157410- 634999 -00000 0.00 220.00 0.00 102973 STORAGE 8/8101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559049 VENDOR 163500 PENINSULAR PAPER COMPANY 10040295 60108 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 1,680.00 0.00 107150 - HANDWIPES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559452 VENDOR 900030 PENNY COSTIN 212769 10 /1- 9/28/01 TRVL P COSTI 001 - 156110 - 640200 -00000 0.00 55.68 0.00 10 /1. 9/28/01 TRVL P COSTIN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559222 VENDOR 276020 - PETROLEUM TRADERS CORP. 10042475 275739 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 1,061.09 0.00 100062 - SUPPLIES 10043105 277193 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 392.28 0.00 100062 FUEL 10043105 278434 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 1.039.65 0.00 100062 FUEL OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10043105 277192 100062 FUEL 10043105 278435 100062 FUEL 10043105 277160 100062 FUEL 10043105 277159 100062 FUEL 10043105 277162 100062 FUEL 10043105 277158 100062 FUEL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 521. 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 521 - 122450 - 652410.00000 0.00 521 - 122450 - 652410.00000 0.00 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559120 VENDOR 217960 . PHIL BURNHAM SUPPLY 10041993 364 408- 233351 - 652990.00000 0.00 101666 HARDWARE CHECK NO 559511 VENDOR 900080 . PHYLLIS H. GROSS 212743 AMB REF P GROSS 4/2/01 490 - 000000. 116004 -00000 0.00 AMB REF P. GROSS 0118520 -1 CHECK NO 559476 VENDOR 900050 . PHYSICANS PRIMARY CARE 212724 JACQUELINE MITCHELL 9/99 517 - 121640 - 645920 -00000 0.00 REIMB INS J MITCHELL 9/99 CHECK NO 559281 VENDOR 303600 - PHYSICIAN SUPPORT SERVICES 10042662 CCG0400 -1 001 - 121810 - 631230 -00000 0.00 101242 PRE - EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS CHECK NO 559307 VENDOR 316240 - PINEGATE VETERINARY CENTER 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1,332.06 0.00 601.66 0.00 4,356.94 0.00 5,759.20 0.00 2,304.15 0.00 4.355.67 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 90.10 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 59.81 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 104.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 121 VCHR NET 1,332.06 601.66 4,356.94 5,759.20 2,304.15 4,355.67 21,202.70 90.10 90.10 59.81 59.81 104.00 104.00 3,876.00 0.00 3.876.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,876.00 1 6 J 1 PAGE 122 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043113 154084 001 - 155410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,036.01 0.00 1,036.01 105956 VET SVC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,036.01 CHECK NO 559215 VENDOR 271160 - PITNEY BOWES, INC. 10043227 589880 408 - 210151 - 651110.00000 0.00 46.19 56.14 408- 210151 - 641950 -00000 0.00 9.95 0.00 59125 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 56.14 CHECK NO 558936 VENDOR 15030 PLASTIC SPECIALTY OF FL 10041992 5566 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 103088 WHITE POLYMER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.00 CHECK NO 559306 VENDOR 315440 PLUMBMASTER 10041995 50907090 001 - 122240 - 652995 -00000 0.00 199.98- 0.00 199.98- 57882 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 10041995 50931419 001. 122240 - 652995 -00000 0.00 478.42 0.00 478.42 57882 PLUMBING SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 278.44 CHECK NO 559121 VENDOR 222290 - POMEROY COMPUTER SERVICES 10041195 B090502427 001 - 421060 - 764900 -00000 0.00 1,686.00 0.00 1,686.00 107177 PRINTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.686.00 CHECK NO 559161 VENDOR 248180 - POWERS ELECTRIC PRODUCTS CO. 10042788 23935 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 65.48 0.00 65.48 058461 BRASS ELECTRODES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 65.48 CHECK NO 559178 VENDOR 255770 - PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST,,LLC 10041997 PJ759720 111 - 156332 - 646313 -00000 0.00 6.01 0.00 6.01 100611 MAINT /REFILLS 10042665 PJ750224 521.122410. 652990.00000 0.00 51.57 0.00 51.57 100122 GASES 16JI OCTOBER 02 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10041997 PJ758564 111 - 156332 - 646313 -00000 0.00 10.29 0.00 100611 MAINT /REFILLS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559384 VENDOR 339730 PRESSTIGE PRINTING 10042796 1160 001. 156363- 647110 -00000 0.00 801.08 0.00 106533 BROCHURES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559016 VENDOR 138230 PRIDE OF FLORIDA, INC. 10041469 ZI077110 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 214.00 0.00 100798 ENVELOPES 10041469 ZI077412 001 - 000000. 142900 -00000 0.00 22.50 0.00 100798 3 -PART 10041469 ZI077285 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 89.00 0.00 100798 CARDS 10041469 ZI077106 001. 000000- 142900 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 100798 LETTERHEAD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559271 VENDOR 299040 PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE LEARNING 10041991 900244262 146 - 144380 - 654360 -00000 0.00 228.00 0.00 101753 SVC 9/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559423 VENDOR 344010 PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR SQL 10042677 MEMBERSHIP /R. HIGDON 001 - 121148 - 654210 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 059247 PASS VOTING MEMBERSHIP HIGDON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559420 VENDOR 343810 - PROFESSIONAL HEATING & COOLING 10042811 J NAVARRO 8/21/01 191 - 138785- 884200 -33751 0.00 2,845.00 0.00 54550440001 J NAVARRO 107743 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559194 VENDOR 259910 - PROGRESSIVE TECHNOLOGIES 16JI PAGE 124 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042661 5157778 -000 121 - 138755- 641900 -33024 0.00 1,175.00 0.00 1,175.00 107361 HEADSETS 10043229 S157432 000 681 - 431310 - 641100 -00000 0.00 4,560.00 0.00 4,560.00 107184 PHONES 10042679 5158146 -000 001 - 010110 - 641900 -00000 0.00 190.00 0.00 190.00 058996 PHOES W /DISPLAY & POWERPACK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,925.00 CHECK NO 559157 VENDOR 246310 - PROJECT INTEGRATION 10043148 #22 (RETAINAGE) 413 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 28,082.15- 0.00 28,082.15- 3122 TO 8/25/01 (RETAINAGE) 10043148 #22 413 - 263611 - 763100.73031 0.00 561,643.25 0.00 561,643.25 3122 TO 8/25/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 533,561.10 CHECK NO 559336 VENDOR 325880 PROSOURCE ONE 10041470 06787100 152 - 162541.652310 -00000 0.00 106.92 0.00 106.92 106710 FERTILIZER 10041317 06786800 111 - 163646 - 652310 -00000 0.00 142.56 0.00 142.56 106711 FERTILIZER 10043112 06852600 109.182602- 652310 -00000 0.00 731.70 0.00 731.70 102709 HYDROTHOL 10041317 0678700 111 - 163646. 652310 -00000 0.00 178.20 0.00 178.20 106711 FERTILIZER 10041317 0812526875 111 - 163646 - 652310 -00000 0.00 582.12 0.00 582.12 106711 FERTILIZER 10041317 06787200 111 - 163646 - 652310 -00000 0.00 272.84 0.00 272.84 106711 FERTILIZER 10041317 06786900 111 - 163646 - 652310 -00000 0.00 148.50 0.00 148.50 106711 FERTILIZER 10042672 06808000 111- 163646 - 652310 -00000 0.00 297.00 0.00 297.00 106711 FERTILIZER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,459.84 CHECK NO 559109 VENDOR 203520 PUBLIX #2453 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043228 I03672616/3216 004 00 111 - 156390 - 652210 -00000 0.00 134.86 0.00 101321FOOD /SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559023 VENDOR 144550 - PYRAMID II JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 10042789 282922 408. 253212- 652510 -00000 0.00 48.24 0.00 058478 JANT SUPPLIES 10042448 282413/BAL 111 - 156313 - 652510.00000 0.00 2.54 0.00 101312 - BALANCE ON INVOICE 10041089 288696 111 - 156313 - 652510 -00000 0.00 265.21 0.00 105536 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 10041089 288696 111. 156313. 652510 -00000 0.00 51.50 0.00 101312 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559108 VENDOR 202510 PYRAMID II, INC. 10041990 288094 001. 155410 - 652510 -00000 0.00 307.14 0.00 101416 JANT SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559300 VENDOR 314170 RANDSTAD NORTH AMERICA 10042390 2395643 490 - 144610 - 634999 -00000 0.00 263.63 0.00 104906 TEMP LABOR 10042390 2403938 490.144610- 634999 -00000 0.00 257.20 0.00 104906 TEMP LABOR 10042390 2399710 490 - 144610 - 634999 -00000 0.00 257.20 0.00 104906 TEMP LABOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559449 VENDOR 344550 RANDY BASS 10043110 9/14 -27 TRVL R BASS 001 - 156130 - 640200 -00000 0.00 84.10 0.00 9/14.27 TRVL R BASS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559435 VENDOR 344300 RANSOM & BENJAMIN PUBLISHERS LLC 1dU1 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043239 2866516 R3 001 - 121810 - 654110 -00000 0.00 199.95 0.00 59365 SUBSCRIPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559444 VENDOR 344470 - RATNE S. DAS M.D. 10042807 P EVANS 01 -1093 681.421190- 631990 -00000 0.00 325.00 0.00 P EVANS 01 -1093 10042807 D RATLIFF 01 -1084 681 - 421190 - 631990 -00000 0.00 325.00 0.00 D RATLIFF,STRONGHORSE,KLADO 01 -1084 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559129 VENDOR 229720 RAYMOND SMITH 10043111 9/24 -26 TRVL R SMITH 114 - 178970. 640300 -00000 0.00 44.00 0.00 9/24 -26 TRVL R SMITH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558938 VENDOR 15730 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC. 10042399 1326959 001. 156110 - 652670 -00000 0.00 17.85 0.00 100854 SUPPLIES 10042399 1327318 001 - 156110 - 652670 -00000 0.00 20.79 0.00 100854 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559065 VENDOR 170590 RECREONICS CORPORATION 10042391 240476 111. 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 216.41 0.00 107287 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559220 VENDOR 275110 REDDY ICE CORPORATION 10042395 00106533 408 - 210130 - 652990 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 101432 ICE 10042395 00106853 408 - 210130- 652990 -00000 0.00 54.00 0.00 101432 ICE 10042394 00105132 408- 253212 - 652990.00000 0.00 54.00 0.00 100921 ICE FLORIDA 16JI OCTOBER 02 2001 , COLLIER COUNTY, REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558939 VENDOR 15740 REDENBAUGH BILLIARD SUPPLY 10042355 9/5 POOL TABLE 368 - 116360 - 764990 -00165 0.00 2,300.00 0.00 107161 POOL TABLE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559440 VENDOR 344430 RENEE SPENCER 10043232 D ROBETS W 11797 001 - 155930 - 634153 -00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 D ROBERTS W 11797 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559202 VENDOR 263810 RESOURCE MEDIA GROUP 10041519 809008 490 - 144610- 654110 -00000 0.00 95.00 0.00 THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO FL FOUNDATIONS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559393 VENDOR 341110 REW MATERIALS 10043247 2135027 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 58.85 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2136666 355 - 156175. 762200.80259 0.00 223.20 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135033 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 1,626.50 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135047 355. 156175- 762200 -80259 0.00 67.80 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135016 355 - 156175 - 762200.80259 0.00 73.66 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135039 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 123.00 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135036 355 - 156175. 762200 -80259 0.00 145.25 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2136347 355 - 156175 - 762200.80259 0.00 394.25 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135128 355. 156175- 762200 -80259 0.00 1.146.94 0.00 106904 STUCCO 1 6 J 1 PAGE 128 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043247 2135041 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 788.50 0.00 788.50 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2134960 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 103.20 0.00 103.20 106904 STUCCO 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 1,019.00 0.00 1,019.00 10043247 2135685 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2136349 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 788.50 0.00 788.50 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135181 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 788.50 0.00 788.50 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135049 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 1,140.00 0.00 1,140.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135703 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 19.98 0.00 19.98 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2134998 355. 156175 - 762200.80259 0.00 264.70 0.00 264.70 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135052 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 560.00- 0.00 560.00- 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135010 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 1.92 0.00 1.92 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135655 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 135.00 0.00 135.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135025 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 215.25 0.00 215.25 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135365 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 788.50 0.00 788.50 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135023 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 730.20 0.00 730.20 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135001 355. 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 102.09 0.00 102.09 106904 STUCCO 10043247 21363530 355 - 156175 - 762200.80259 0.00 557.16 0.00 557.16 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2136351 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 373.80 0.00 373.80 106904 STUCCO FLORIDA 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10043247 2135012 355. 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 430.00 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135018 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 372.50 0.00 106904 STUCCO 10043247 2135030 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 8.07 0.00 106904 STUCCO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559304 VENDOR 315150 REXEL CONSOLIDATED 10042857 12 244092 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 31.73 0.00 57887 FILLER PLATE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559422 VENDOR 343910 RICHARD B. & MARY ANN LANSDALE 10042400 SELLER'S PROCEEDS 336 - 163650 - 761100 -60101 0.00 3,700.00 0.00 107810 SELLER'S PROCEEEDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558940 VENDOR 16050 RICHARD'S PORTABLE WELDING 10041516 09/07/01 109 - 182602 - 634999 -00000 0.00 95.00 0.00 WELDING REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559066 VENDOR 170740 RITA ROSE MEYER 10042392 8/7.9/18 BALLET 111 - 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 577.20 0.00 107806 8/7 -9/18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559358 VENDOR 333400 ROBERT S. COX 10042449 9/19 -21 TRVL ROBERT COX 001- 172970 - 640300 -00000 0.00 195.50 0.00 9/19 -21 TRAVEL ROBERT COX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559208 VENDOR 266940 - ROCHESTER MIDLAND CREATIVE CHEM 10042393 009040445 001 - 122220 - 652990 -00000 0.00 505.05 0.00 100376 SANITATION OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559453 VENDOR 900030 - RONALD HOVELL 212721 9/19 -21 TRVL RON HOVELL 195. 110407 - 640300 -00000 0.00 46.50 0.00 9/19 -21 TRAVEL RONALD HOVELL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559225 VENDOR 277750 RONNEY D. COX 10043381 9/13 -28 TRVL R COX 129 - 156110 - 640200 -33014 0.00 74.24 0.00 9/13 -28 TRVL R COX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559409 VENDOR 343300 ROSA CASTILLO 10042382 AD VIVA MAPLES 111 - 156341 - 648170 -00000 0.00 230.00 0.00 58684 AD VIVA NAPLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559477 VENDOR 900050 RTR ELECTRIC INC 212737 2001090657 RTR ELECTRIC 113 - 138900. 322110 -00000 0.00 321.50 0.00 2001090657 RTR ELECTRIC CHECK TOTAL •0.00 CHECK NO 559262 VENDOR 294080 RUSSELL TROUTMAN M.D. 10043237 L KODAK 8/21 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 107.25 0.00 59437 L KODAK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559282 VENDOR 304960 RUTH SZABO 10042464 7/17 -9/25 TRVL RUTY SZABO 001 - 156110 - 640300 -00000 0.00 55.12 0.00 7/17 -9/25 TRAVEL RUBH SZABO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559335 VENDOR 325750 - RWA INC. 10042354 7801 113 - 138900 - 634999 -00000 0.00 425.00 0.00 105322 MEETINGS 10042354 7798 113 - 138900 - 634999 -00000 0.00 212.50 0.00 105322 MEETINGS 1941 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042354 7799 113. 138900- 634999 -00000 0.00 1,105.00 0.00 105322 MEETINGS 10042354 7796 113 - 138900. 634999 -00000 0.00 722.50 0.00 105322 MEETINGS 10042354 7800 113 - 138900 - 634999 -00000 0.00 297.50 0.00 105322 MEETINGS 10042354 7797 113 - 138900- 634999 -00000 0.00 467.50 0.00 105322 MEETINGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559241 VENDOR 283800 SAFECO, INC. 10042375 5696051 408 - 210130 - 646970 -00000 0.00 699.93 0.00 107745 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559013 VENDOR 135030 SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY 10042396 176695 408 - 210130 - 652910 -00000 0.00 135.04 0.00 107082 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559041 VENDOR 159590 SAM "S CLUB #6364 NAPLES 10042379 101 44366342988 9/19 111 - 156341 - 652990.00000 0.00 479.90 111 - 156341. 652210 -00000 0.00 18.77 0.00 59066 SUPPLIES 10042385 101 24366342988 9/7 111 - 156395 - 652210 -00000 0.00 64.85 111 - 156341 - 647210 -00000 0.00 12.98 0.00 58673 SODA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559249 VENDOR 287230 SANDRA RAMOS 10042793 8/28 TRVL S RAMOS 111 - 156349 - 640200 -00000 0.00 11.02 0.00 8/28 TRVL S RAMOS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559478 VENDOR 900050 SANIA BAROSY 212711 REFUND PARKS S BAROSY 670 - 000000 - 220010 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 REFUND PARKS S BAROSY OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 559075 VENDOR 174790 - SATCO 10043230 230438 100265 ACID 10043230 230455 100265 ACID 10043230 230449 100265 ACID 10043230 230407 100265 ACID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408- 253221. 652310 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221. 652310 -00000 0.00 408. 253221- 652310 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221 - 652310.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559308 VENDOR 316590 - SBC DATACOMM CHECK TOTAL 10042357 375 036526 001 - 121143 - 764950 -00000 0.00 1,071.25 106953 COM PROG 0.00 1,071.25 10043398 375 036525 001 - 121143 - 764900.00000 0.00 0.00 106954 POWER CORDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10042358 375 036235 301. 121810- 764900.01800 0.00 20,366.00 107730 COM PROG 20,366.00 690.18 10042358 375 036235 301 - 121810. 764900 -01800 0.00 2,744.41 107730 COM PROG 0.00 25,497.19 CHECK NO 559093 VENDOR 193330 - SCOTT PAINT CORP. 80.70 10042373 9050937 001. 122240- 652999 -00000 0.00 59.65 101978 SUPPLIES 0.00 24.51 10042531 9050760 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 59228 PAINT SUPPLIES 10042858 9050891 408- 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 102353 PAINT SUPPLIES 10042373 9050954 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 101978 SUPPLIES 10042531 9050821 001 - 122240 - 652999.00000 0.00 59228 PAINT SUPPLIES 16JI PAGE 132 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 1,071.25 0.00 1,071.25 1,071.25 0.00 1,071.25 1,066.54 0.00 1.066.54 1,072.54 0.00 1,072.54 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,281.58 1,696.60 0.00 1,696.60 20,366.00 0.00 20,366.00 690.18 0.00 690.18 2.744.41 0.00 2,744.41 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25,497.19 167.99 0.00 167.99 80.70 0.00 80.70 59.65 0.00 59.65 24.51 0.00 24.51 15.78 0.00 15.78 CHECK NO 559394 VENDOR 341120 - SEAMON RESTORATION 10038603 8/13 REPAIR 198 - 157410 - 646710 -00000 0.00 275.00 0.00 275.00 106900 8/13 REPAIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 275.00 CHECK NO 558986 VENDOR 120880 - SEMSCO 10043246 3525087 413 - 263611 - 763100 -73945 0.00 710.00- 0.00 710.00- 102881 SUPPLIES CREDIT 10043246 3500114 413 - 263611 - 763100.73945 0.00 3,667.95 0.00 3,667.95 102881 SUPPLIES CREDIT 16JI PAGE 133 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042373 9050962 001. 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 15.57 0.00 15.57 101978 SUPPLIES 10042373 9051003 001 - 122240. 652999 -00000 0.00 176.43 0.00 176.43 101978 SUPPLIES 10042373 9050959 001 - 122240- 652999 -00000 0.00 32.74 0.00 32.74 101978 SUPPLIES 10042531 9046357 001. 122240- 652999 -00000 0.00 152.07 0.00 152.07 59228 PAINT SUPPLIES 10042531 9050611 001 - 122240 - 652999.00000 0.00 193.47 0.00 193.47 59228 PAINT SUPPLIES 10042531 9050862 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 27.47 0.00 27.47 59228 PAINT SUPPLIES 10042374 9050934 111 - 156332- 652999.00000 0.00 26.39 0.00 26.39 102636 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 972.77 CHECK NO 559250 VENDOR 287680 - SCOTT W. HOLZEM 10042397 324 681- 431590 - 631020 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 101473 TRAFFIC COURT 9/4 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 90.00 CHECK NO 558987 VENDOR 120930 - SEAL DISTRIBUTORS INC. 10042497 01.7296 408 - 210130 - 655100 -00000 0.00 3,335.93 0.00 3,335.93 107653 - SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,335.93 CHECK NO 559394 VENDOR 341120 - SEAMON RESTORATION 10038603 8/13 REPAIR 198 - 157410 - 646710 -00000 0.00 275.00 0.00 275.00 106900 8/13 REPAIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 275.00 CHECK NO 558986 VENDOR 120880 - SEMSCO 10043246 3525087 413 - 263611 - 763100 -73945 0.00 710.00- 0.00 710.00- 102881 SUPPLIES CREDIT 10043246 3500114 413 - 263611 - 763100.73945 0.00 3,667.95 0.00 3,667.95 102881 SUPPLIES CREDIT FLORIDA 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559238 VENDOR 282410 - SHAMROCK PLUMBING & MECHANICAL INC 10042378 34096 111 - 156332- 646311 -00000 0.00 120.00 0.00 58735 CLRAN AND REPAIR PUMP 10042352 33726 111 - 156313 - 763100 -00000 0.00 2,710.00 0.00 103713 PLUMB LABOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559205 VENDOR 265590 SHARI FERGUSON 10043233 552 111 - 156341 - 634999 -00000 0.00 789.18 0.00 105344 WEBSITE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559243 VENDOR 284700 SHARON L. JOHNSTON, D.O. 10043240 K PAYNE 1112 1/31 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 273.00 0.00 59438 K PAYNE 1/12 1/30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559216 VENDOR 271730 - SHELL OIL COMPANY 10042188 079020467107 AUGUST BILL 521 - 122450 - 652410.00000 0.00 119.17 0.00 GAS FOR AUGUST CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559196 VENDOR 260670 - SHIPP MATES 10041518 2285 408 - 210151 - 652110 -00000 0.00 93.00 408 - 210151 - 641950 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 SHIRTS FOR STAFF 10042388 2286 473 - 173413 - 652110 -00000 0.00 152.00 0.00 58984 SHIRTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559362 VENDOR 333860 - SHORELINE FLOORING SUPPLIES 10042673 540773 191 - 138785 - 884100 -00000 0.00 572.95 0.00 83291760008 C MONTEJO 107482 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559345 VENDOR 329790 - SKILLPATH SEMINARS 10042455 6351688 001 - 121141 - 654360.00000 0.00 16JI PAGE 135 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 10042453 635169 R.HOGDON 001 - 121148 - 654360 -00000 0.00 189.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 59203 REGISTRATION R.HOGDON FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 10042453 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 559277 VENDOR 301270 SIEGFRIED,RIVERA,LERNER, 10043397 SEPT 25 LEGAL FEES 001 - 010520 - 631100 -00000 0.00 13,756.45 0.00 13.756.45 0.00 107868 SEPT 25 LEGAL FEES 189.00 59204 - REGISTRATION (M.BERRIOS) CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13.756.45 CHECK NO 558941 VENDOR 16950 SIGN CRAFT 189.00 0.00 189.00 10042187 16711 521 - 122410 - 647110 -00000 0.00 2,626.00 0.00 2,626.00 10042472 106708 SUPPLIES 001 - 121140 - 654360.00000 0.00 189.00 0.00 189.00 59201 - CONFERENCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.626.00 CHECK NO 559197 VENDOR 260690 SIGNCRAFT 10042398 16732 1,134.00 001 - 156363 - 646316 -00000 0.00 642.00 0.00 642.00 107198 LOGO 10041517 17469 198 - 157410 - 647110 -00000 0.00 54.60 0.00 54.60 VINYL NUMBERS FOR OUTDOOR SIGNS 10042387 17200 001 - 122240 - 649990 -00000 0.00 420.00 0.00 420.00 57833 LETTERING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,116.60 CHECK NO 559345 VENDOR 329790 - SKILLPATH SEMINARS 10042455 6351688 001 - 121141 - 654360.00000 0.00 189.00 0.00 189.00 59202 - MGR /SUPERVISOR CONFERENCE 10042453 635169 R.HOGDON 001 - 121148 - 654360 -00000 0.00 189.00 0.00 189.00 59203 REGISTRATION R.HOGDON 10042453 635169 T.SMITH 001 - 121148.654360 -00000 0.00 189.00 0.00 189.00 59203 REGISTRATION T.SMITH 10042454 6351701 (M.BERRIOS) 001- 121143 - 654360 -00000 0.00 189.00 0.00 189.00 59204 - REGISTRATION (M.BERRIOS) 10042454 635170 (J.BOLEN) 001. 121143 - 654360 -00000 0.00 189.00 0.00 189.00 59204 - REGISTRATION (J.BOLEN) 10042472 6351685 001 - 121140 - 654360.00000 0.00 189.00 0.00 189.00 59201 - CONFERENCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,134.00 CHECK NO 559119 VENDOR 215640 - SNAP -ON -TOOLS FLORIDA 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042841 70403 521. 122410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 43.00 0.00 59391 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559297 VENDOR 313450 - SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 10042389 13278 516 - 121650 - 764950 -00000 0.00 74.20 0.00 58655 LICENSE 10042377 13DB5 408 - 210155 - 652920 -00000 0.00 223.41 0.00 58583 MEDIA WINDOWS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558942 VENDOR 17260 SOLINET 10042359 285813 129 - 156110 - 634210 -33774 0.00 2,411.57 0.00 102694 USER FEES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559114 VENDOR 210810 SOUTHERN SERVICES 10042856 1666 111 - 163645 - 634999 -00000 0.00 9,468.50 0.00 100821 MOWING SVS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559516 VENDOR 900140 SOUTHTRUST BANK 212610 01- 8288 -MMA M.LARA 681 - 431590 - 635700 -00000 0.00 28.20 0.00 01 -8288 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559096 VENDOR 194210 SPECIALTY TECHNICAL PUBLISHERS INC. 10042381 780395 118.144210- 654110 -33791 0.00 364.00 0.00 58936 RENEWAL SUBCRIPTION 10043238 780950 118 - 144210 - 654110 -33791 0.00 285.00 0.00 59343 RENEWALFEDERAL TOXIS PROGRAM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559038 VENDOR 157700 - SPORTIME 10042386 87134085 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 90.75 111 - 156349 - 652910 -00000 0.00 223.63 0.00 57792 SUPPLIES 16JI OCTOBER 0 2 , 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559433 VENDOR 344160 - SPORTS SPECIALTY & REHAB CENTER INC 10043234 L OJEDA 8/2,6 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 216.95 0.00 L OJEDA 8/2,6 107864 10043234 L OJEDA 7/17 26 30 001- 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 302.25 0.00 L OJEDA 7/17 26 30 107864 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559267 VENDOR 297500 - SPRI PRODUCTS INC 10042383 45281 111 - 156313 - 652910.00000 0.00 497.00 0.00 58682 SUPPLIES 10043236 15927 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 290.10 0.00 107488 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559165 VENDOR 250020 - SPRINT 10042360 362935190 9/7 109 - 182601- 641400.00000 0.00 37.34 109 - 182900 - 641400 -00000 0.00 37.34 778 - 182700. 641400 -00000 0.00 12.44 0.00 362935190 9/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559177 VENDOR 255040 - SPRINT 10042361 597 8444 092 9/7 10/6 001- 156170 - 641900 -00000 0.00 108.91 0.00 597 8444 092 9/7 10/6 10043194 643 8400 8/16.9/15 001. 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 2.338.00 0.00 643 8400 8/16 -9/15 10043194 775 6687 8/21 -9/20 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 33.24 0.00 775 6687 8/21 -9/20 10042361 403 8397 392 9/7 10/6 101. 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 32.27 0.00 403 8397 392 9/7 10/6 10043194 774 1146 8/19 -9/18 001 - 000000 - 202800.00000 0.00 519.82 0.00 774 1146 8/19 -9/18 10042361 394 3272 147 9/7 10/6 001 - 156160 - 641900.00000 0.00 87.11 0.00 394 3272 147 9/7 10/6 16JI PAGE 138 OCTOBER 0 2 , 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043194 774 9106 8119.9118 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 33.24 0.00 33.24 774 9106 8/19 -9/18 10042361 597 2255 452 917 1016 101. 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 28.61 0.00 28.61 597 2255 452 9/7 10/6 10042361 348 2784 799 9/7 10/6 408 - 253211. 641100 -00000 0.00 29.92 0.00 29.92 348 2784 799 9/7 10/6 10043194 732 3168 8/22 -9/21 001 - 000000- 202800.00000 0.00 43.50 0.00 43.50 732 3168 8/22 -9/21 10042361 455 8088 880 9/10 10/9 001. 156145. 641900 -00000 0.00 218.89 0.00 218.89 455 8088 880 9/10 10/9 10042361 597 6707 284 9/7 10/6 109 - 182601 - 641400.00000 0.00 14.25 109 - 182900 - 641400 -00000 0.00 14.25 778- 182700 - 641400 -00000 0.00 4.75 0.00 33.25 597 6707 284 9/7 10/6 10042361 394 6750 137 9/7 10/6 441 - 256110 - 641100 -00000 0.00 33.00 0.00 33.00 394 6750 137 9/7 10/6 10043194 101 2081 8/1 -31 001- 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 495.49 0.00 495.49 101 2081 8/1 -31 10042361 394 2134 664 9/7 10/6 470 - 173442 - 641900 -00000 0.00 76.17 0.00 76.17 394 2134 664 9/7 10/6 10042361 103 8402 532 9/7 10/6 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 32.16 0.00 32.16 103 8402 532 9/7 10/6 10042361 455 2830 960 9/10 10/9 470. 173435- 641900 -00000 0.00 96.23 0.00 96.23 455 2830 960 9/10 10/9 10043194 657 3232 8/28 -9/27 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 27.71 0.00 27.71 657 3232 8/28 -9/27 10042361 455 1441 953 9/10 10/9 001 - 156140 - 641900 -00000 0.00 171.02 0.00 171.02 455 1441 953 9/10 10/9 10043194 658 7300 8/13 -9/12 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 566.00 0.00 566.00 658 7300 8/13 -9/12 10042361 774 1667 780 6/19 7/18 001 - 155230 - 641900 -00000 0.00 33.12 0.00 33.12 774 1667 780 6/19 7/18 10043194 657 8228 8/28 -9/27 001 - 000000 - 202800.00000 0.00 63.80 0.00 63.80 657 8228 8/28 -9/27 1 6 J 1 PAGE 139 OCTOBER 0 2 , 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043194 334 6249 8/4.9/3 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 980.48 0.00 980.48 334 6249 8/4 -9/3 10042361 657 9696 109 7/28 8/27 111 - 156334 - 641900 -00000 0.00 26.17 0.00 26.17 657 9696 109 7/28 8/27 10042361 455 2612 627 9/10 10/9 001 - 156145 - 641900 -00000 0.00 28.64 0.00 28.64 455 2612 627 9/10 10/9 10042361 597 3653 597 9/7 10/6 001 - 156170 - 641210 -00000 0.00 36.61 0.00 36.61 597 3653 597 9/7 10/6 10043194 658 0781 8/13 -9/12 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 32.74 0.00 32.74 658 0781 8/13 -9/12 10042361 394 3402 652 9/7 10/6 001 - 122240 - 641900.00000 0.00 32.16 0.00 32.16 394 3402 652 9/7 10/6 10043194 774 7686 8/19 -9/18 001 - 000000 - 202800.00000 0.00 23.41 0.00 23.41 774 7686 8/19/ -9/18 10042854 455 6188 294 9/10 10/9 408 - 253211. 641100 -00000 0.00 377.19 0.00 377.19 455 6188 294 9/10 10/9 10042361 597 5355 941 9/7 10/6 408 - 233312 - 641100.00000 0.00 255.23 0.00 255.23 597 5355 941 9/7 10/6 10043194 101 1919 8/1 -31 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 291.70 0.00 291.70 101 1919 8/1 -31 10043194 092 2026 8/16 -/15 001. 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 199.79 0.00 199.79 092 2026 8/16 -9/15 10042361 597 2265 030 9/7 10/6 109 - 182601 - 641400 -00000 0.00 49.49 109 - 182900- 641400.00000 0.00 49.49 778. 182700 - 641400 -00000 0.00 16.47 0.00 115.45 597 2265 030 9/7 10/6 10042361 455 2275 227 9/10 10/9 408 - 253221 - 641100.00000 0.00 67.82 0.00 67.82 455 2275 227 9/10 10/9 10042361 394 2793 738 9/7 10/6 001 - 156363 - 641900 -00000 0.00 28.81 0.00 28.81 394 2793 738 9/7 10/6 10042361 394 6835 293 9/7 10/6 521 - 122410 - 641400 -00000 0.00 28.73 0.00 28.73 394 6835 293 9/7 10/6 10042361 353 3958 762 8/25 9/24 001 - 122240 - 641900 -00000 0.00 63.94 0.00 63.94 353 3958 762 8/25 9/24 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 284.72 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 26.30 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 35.63 0.00 FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 10042361 394 2383 111 917 10/6 001 - 156160 - 641210 -00000 0.00 75.53 394 2383 111 9/7 10/6 25.17 0.00 10043194 101 1943 8/1 -31 001- 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 49.55 101 1943 8/1 -31 32.16 0.00 10043194 774 8049 8/19.9/18 001. 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 774 8049 8/19 -9/18 10042361 657 5199 643 8/28 9/27 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 657 5199 643 8/28 9/27 10042361 403 8374 468 9/7 10/6 101 - 163630 - 641900.00000 0.00 403 8374 468 9/7 10/6 10042361 394 7776 689 9/7 10/6 001. 156160- 641900 -00000 0.00 394 7776 689 9/7 10/6 10042854 455 4211 062 9/10 10/9 490 - 144610- 641900 -00000 0.00 455 4211 062 9/10 10/9 10043194 643 6575 8/16 -9/15 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 643 6575 8/16 -9/15 10042854 732 2098 633 8/22 9/21 101. 163620 - 641900 -00000 0.00 732 2098 633 8/22 9/21 10042361 455 9282 744 9/10 10/9 001 - 156363. 641900.00000 0.00 455 9282 744 9/10 10/9 10042361 597 1749 015 9/7 10/6 109 - 182601. 641400 -00000 0.00 109 - 182900. 641400 -00000 0.00 778 - 182700. 641400 -00000 0.00 597 1749 015 9/7 10/6 10042361 348 0218 433 9/7 10/6 490 - 144610 - 641900 -00000 0.00 348 0218 433 9/7 10/6 10043194 732 2700 8/22 -9/21 001. 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 732 2700 8/22 -9/21 10043194 774 9207 8/19 -9118 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 774 9207 8/19 -9/18 10042361 348 0337 918 9/7 10/6 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 348 0337 918 9/7 10/6 10042361 455 2343 947 9/10 10/9 130 - 157710. 641900 -00000 0.00 455 2343 947 9/10 10/9 16JI AMT NET VCHR DISC 33.06 0.00 284.72 0.00 1,716.78 0.00 26.30 0.00 32.04 0.00 35.63 0.00 25.58 0.00 1,612.32 0.00 30.42 0.00 93.68 0.00 75.53 75.53 25.17 0.00 47.04 0.00 808.21 0.00 49.55 0.00 32.16 0.00 291.41 0.00 PAGE 140 VCHR NET 33.06 284.72 1,716.78 26.30 32.04 35.63 25.58 1,612.32 30.42 93.68 176.23 47.04 808.21 49.55 32.16 291.41 CHECK NO 559454 VENDOR 900030 - STAN CHRZANOWSKI PAGE 141 VCHR NET 30.15 32.04 725.24 33.24 162.19 29.70 32.08 7,760.05 32.27 29.63 61.63 21,913.68 44.00 44.00 155.65 155.65 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042361 394 6667 062 9/7 10/6 490 - 144610 - 641900.00000 0.00 30.15 0.00 394 6667 062 9/7 10/6 10042361 348 0256 115 9/7 10/6 101. 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 32.04 0.00 348 0256 115 9/7 10/6 10043243 261 2382 171 8/25 9/24 001 - 121143 - 641400 -00000 0.00 725.24 0.00 261 2382 171 8/25 9/24 10043194 774 9356 8/19 -9/18 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 33.24 0.00 774 9356 8/19 -9/18 10042854 455 1202 295 9/10 10/9 408 - 253212 - 641100 -00000 0.00 162.19 0.00 455 1202 295 9/10 10/9 10042361 597 8078 038 9/7 10/6 408. 233313- 641100 -00000 0.00 29.70 0.00 597 8078 038 9/7 10/6 10042361 455 5051 078 9/10 10/9 470 - 173435 - 641900 -00000 0.00 32.08 0.00 455 5051 078 9/10 10/9 10043194 774 8999 8/19 -9/18 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 7,760.05 0.00 774 8999 8/19 -9/18 10042361 403 8373 012 9/7 10/6 101 - 163630 - 641900 -00000 0.00 32.27 0.00 403 8373 012 9/7 10/6 10042361 597 2917 580 9/7 10/6 490 - 144610 - 641900.00000 0.00 29.63 0.00 597 2917 580 9/7 10/6 10043194 657 1035 8/28 -9/27 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 61.63 0.00 657 1035 8/28 -9/27 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559375 VENDOR 338370 SPRINT YELLOW PAGES 10042380 206811078 DIR 113. 138900- 634999 -00000 0.00 44.00 0.00 58212 YELLOW PAGES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559113 VENDOR 209310 SPRINT /UNITED TELEPHONE - FLORIDA 10042376 B090504883 001 - 156110- 646710 -00000 0.00 155.65 0.00 100932 MAINT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559454 VENDOR 900030 - STAN CHRZANOWSKI PAGE 141 VCHR NET 30.15 32.04 725.24 33.24 162.19 29.70 32.08 7,760.05 32.27 29.63 61.63 21,913.68 44.00 44.00 155.65 155.65 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 212720 9/19 -21 TVL S.CHRZANOWSKI 113- 138312 - 640300.00000 0.00 59.15 0.00 9/19 -21 TRAVEL S.CHRZANOWSKI CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558959 VENDOR 102890 STANDARD & POOR'S CORPORATION 10042855 8730123 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 5,847.88 0.00 107516 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559031 VENDOR 149220 STEELE TRUCK CENTER 10042370 52801 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 65.68 0.00 100116 SUPPLIES 10042370 52664 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 100.72 0.00 100116 SUPPLIES 10042370 52825 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 83.58 0.00 100116 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559286 VENDOR 306810 - STEPHEN WHITTIER 10043106 9/10 -28 TRVL S WHITTIER 111 - 156341 - 640200 -00000 0.00 88.16 0.00 9/10.28 TRVL S WHITTIER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559169 VENDOR 253560 STERLING SOLUTIONS, INC. 10043181 00359.010 001 - 155230 - 646710 -00000 0.00 600.00 0.00 107736 MAINT. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559455 VENDOR 900030 STEVE SEAL 212719 9/19 -20 TRVL STEVE SEAL 113 - 138312 - 640300.00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 9/19 -20 TRAVEL STEVE SEAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559231 VENDOR 281040 - SUBWAY OF NAPLES 10040426 INV #1109010 001 - 122240 - 652210 -00000 0.00 800.00 0.00 107446 - 125PP EMP APR LUNCH OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559295 VENDOR 312170 - SUCCESSORIES 10042384 21151954 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 180.25 0.00 55334 SUPPLIES 10042384 21152691 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 37.90 0.00 55334 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558946 VENDOR 17800 - SUMMIT HOME RESP, SVC, INC 10042859 W JOHNSON 6/1,7/1 001 - 155930 - 652810.00000 0.00 110.00 0.00 107780 W JOHNSON 6/1.7/1 10042859 A NAVA 6/5,7/5 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 110.00 0.00 107780 A NAVA 6/5,7/5 10042859 G KOGER 5/31,6/4 001 - 155930.652810 -00000 0.00 513.75 0.00 107780 G KOGER 5/31.6/4 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558944 VENDOR 17660 SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 10042366 379618 111.156313- 652910 -00000 0.00 49.82 0.00 101346 SUPPLIES 10042532 379874 111 - 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 123.58 0.00 100591 SUPPLIES 10040432 379683 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 8.21 0.00 100591 SUPPLIES 10040436 379719 001. 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 35.99 0.00 105639 SUPPLIES 10043235 379839 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 44.99 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 5.03 0.00 100591 SUPPLIES 10042532 379898 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 11.65 0.00 100591 SUPPLIES 10042362 197156 001 - 172910. 652990 -00000 0.00 28.33 0.00 100284 SUPPLIES 10040437 379666 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 15.90 0.00 106581 - SUPLIES 16JI PAGE 144 OCTOBER 02 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042532 379620 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 32.38 0.00 32.38 100591 SUPPLIES 10042532 379724 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 11.99 0.00 11.99 100591 SUPPLIES 10042532 379620 111. 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 65.21 0.00 65.21 100591 SUPPLIES 10042366 379371 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 8.99 0.00 8.99 101346 SUPPLIES 10042532 379832 111 - 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 4.69 0.00 4.69 100591 SUPPLIES 10042365 379727 111 - 156313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 18.56 0.00 18.56 101225 SUPPLIES 10040432 379701 111 - 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 19.89 0.00 19.89 100591 . SUPPLIES 10042532 379898 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 18.57 0.00 18.57 100591 SUPPLIES 10042372 379765 001 - 122240. 652990 -00000 0.00 17.05 0.00 17.05 105639 SUPPLIES 10040436 379720 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 8.98 0.00 8.98 105639 SUPPLIES 10040432 379683 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 49.44 0.00 49.44 100591 SUPPLIES 10042532 379591 111- 156332. 652910 -00000 0.00 22.46 0.00 22.46 100591 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 601.71 CHECK NO 558945 VENDOR 17670 SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 10042367 444555 408 - 210130- 652910 -00000 0.00 891.01 0.00 891.01 101418 SUPPLIES 10042368 44466 408 - 233351 - 652910 -00000 0.00 228.85 0.00 228.85 101440 SUPPLIES 10042364 445114 408 - 233313 - 652990 -00000 0.00 21.55 0.00 21.55 101007 SUPPLIES 10042363 444452 408 - 233312 - 652910 -00000 0.00 8.18 0.00 8.18 100765 SUPPLIES FLORIDA 16JI OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559103 VENDOR 200380 SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 10042369 379856 408 - 253211 - 652990 -00000 0.00 16.15 0.00 101631 SUPPLIES 10042369 9/11 SUPPLIES 408. 253211- 652990 -00000 0.00 7.09 0.00 101631 SUPPLIES 10042371 379835 408 - 253221 - 652990 -00000 0.00 32.12 0.00 101748 SUPPLIES 10040434 379662 408 - 253211 - 652990 -00000 0.00 49.43 0.00 101631 - SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559456 VENDOR 900030 - SUSAN ANDERSON 212718 10/18- 7/10/01 S.ANDERSON 001 - 156140. 640200 -00000 0.00 43.50 0.00 10/18- 7/10/01 TRVL SUSAN ANDERSON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559367 VENDOR 335100 - SUSAN PETR 10042467 5/22,9/18 TRVL SUSAN PETR 001 - 156130 - 640300 -00000 0.00 26.50 0.00 5/22,9/18 TRAVEL SUSAN PETR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559182 VENDOR 256420 - SWFLN 10042353 M MATTHES MEM 001. 156110. 652630 -00000 0.00 3,000.00 0.00 107470 M MATTHES MEM 10043399 JUNE O1- MAY -03 001 - 156110 - 654380 -00000 0.00 1,011.67 355 - 156190 - 654380 -00000 0.00 11,988.33 0.00 107843 JUNE O1 -MAY 03 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558949 VENDOR 18690 - T -SHIRT EXPRESS 10043052 26131 111 - 156332 - 652110 -00000 0.00 972.26 111 - 156334 - 652110 -00000 0.00 177.32 0.00 107201 JACKETS, 8/30 10042952 26394 111 - 156341 - 652110 -00000 0.00 213.10 0.00 102025 T- SHIRTS, 9/25 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042952 26394 102025 3% DISCOUNT 10043050 26336 107202 JACKETS, 9/5 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111 - 156341 - 652110.00000 0.00 001. 156363 - 652110 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558947 VENDOR 18020 - TAMIAMI FORD INC 0.00 10042185 86435 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 0.00 100117 PARTS, 9/7 0.00 140.33 10042185 86435 360.74 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 37.86 100117 PARTS, 9/7 538.93 63.00 10042185 86385 CHECK TOTAL 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 228.99 100117 PARTS, 9/6 228.99 251.92 CHECK NO 559512 VENDOR 900080 - TAMMY STROHL P.A. - TRUST ACCOUNT 219.49 212747 AMB REF.JONES 8/4100 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 312.00 AMB REF.JONES 0026237 -1 312.00 CHECK NO 559217 VENDOR 272270 - TAMPA BAY ENGINEERING, INC. 10043152 R081821 TTJ 412 - 273511 - 631400.70048 0.00 917924 THRU 8/30/01 10043152 R081821 TTJ 414 - 263611. 631400.73048 0.00 917924 THRU 8/30/01 10043152 R081821 TTJ 412 - 273511. 631400 -70047 0.00 917924 THRU 8/30/01 CHECK NO 559340 VENDOR 326360 - TERMINIX 10042438 RENEWAL PLAN - OCHOPEE 146 - 144380 - 646110 -00000 0.00 59105 - RENEWAL PLAN - OCHOPEE FIRE CHECK NO 559083 VENDOR 183920 - THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST I PAGE 146 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 6.40- 0.00 6.40- 547.96 0.00 547.96 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,904.24 140.33 0.00 140.33 360.74 0.00 360.74 37.86 0.00 37.86 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 538.93 63.00 0.00 63.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 63.00 228.99 0.00 228.99 251.92 0.00 251.92 219.49 0.00 219.49 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 700.40 312.00 0.00 312.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 312.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20000014 LH20101 7/01- 6/30/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 212 - 939030 - 873100.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 558885 VENDOR 5440 - THE DUMONT COMPANY 10042267 079744 111. 156313. 652311 -00000 101243 HYPOCHLORITE 10042424 079866 111 - 156349 - 652811 -00000 101245 - HYPOCHLORITE CHECK NO 559410 VENDOR 343320 . THE ENERGY BAR COMPANY 10041087 4399 516 - 121650 - 652990 -00000 058948 FITNESS BARS CHECK NO 558935 VENDOR 14880 . THE PHOTO LAB 10043405 77089 WASTEWATER 408- 210130 - 647210.00000 391.50 100535 FILM PROCESSING 593.00 10043405 76971 WASTWATER 408. 210130- 647210 -00000 CHECK TOTAL 100535 FILM PROCESSING 984.50 10042471 76851 /WASTEWATER 408 - 210130 - 647210 -00000 123.60 100535 - FILM PROCESSING CHECK TOTAL 10042797 77061 LIBRARY 001- 156110 - 652990 -00000 30.90 103746 FILM PROCESSING 30.90 10042676 76939 PUBLIC INFO 001. 100130 - 647210 -00000 4.00 059236 FILM PROCESSING 17.60 10042676 76940 PUBLIC INFO 001 - 100130 - 647210 -00000 14.10 059236 FILM PROCESSING 14.10 10042470 77028/DAS 001 - 155410 - 647210 -00000 30.00 101192 - FILM PROCESSING 5.65 CHECK NO 558937 VENDOR 15270 - THE PRINT SHOP 10042459 51471 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 100648 - CITATION BOOK 16JI PAGE 147 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 400.00 0.00 400.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 400.00 0.00 391.50 0.00 391.50 0.00 593.00 0.00 593.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 984.50 0.00 123.60 0.00 123.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 123.60 0.00 30.90 0.00 30.90 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 17.60 0.00 17.60 0.00 14.10 0.00 14.10 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 5.65 0.00 5.65 0.00 16.40 0.00 16.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 118.65 0.00 319.17 0.00 319.17 16JI OCTOBER 0 2 , 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 10042459 51566 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 49.20 0.00 100648 - HVAC CARDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559390 VENDOR 340580 THE WORLD'S BEACH 10042348 00022352 111 - 156313 - 646970 -00000 0.00 31.00 0.00 ALUMINUM SEAT TUBES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559414 VENDOR 343530 THOMAS HARLAN 10042602 WEB PAGE FOR MUSEUM 198 - 157410 - 634999.00000 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 107625 - WEB PAGE FOR MUSEUM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559395 VENDOR 341150 TONI'S FURNITURE 10042942 106902 301 - 157110 - 763100 -00000 0.00 16,000.00 0.00 106902 - PERGOLAS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559150 VENDOR 239650 TOTAL COMMUNICATION CONCEPTS GROUP, 10042435 1342 408 - 233352 - 649990.00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 53872 - REPROGRAM ANSWERING MACHINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559064 VENDOR 169660 - TRAFFIC PARTS, INC. 10042428 149479 313.163673- 763100 -60172 0.00 3,180.85 0.00 106484 TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT 8/31 10042428 149536 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60172 0.00 3,035.25 0.00 106484 TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT 8/31 10042428 149480 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60172 0.00 4,348.30 0.00 106484 TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT 8/31 10042428 149481 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60172 0.00 3,031.85 0.00 106484 TRAFFIC EQUIPMENT 8/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559260 VENDOR 291440 - TRAVEL CREATIONS CHECK NO 559047 VENDOR 162300 - TROPICAL FENCE 16JI PAGE 149 OCTOBER 02 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043177 T.OLLIFF - 10/9.14/01 001 - 100110 - 640300 -00000 0.00 257.45 0.00 257.45 058356 - AIRFARE F /GOVERNING CONF. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 257.45 CHECK NO 558948 VENDOR 18490 - TRI- COUNTY BLUEPRINT & SUPPLY 10042430 4020377 408. 210105- 647110 -00000 0.00 28.80 0.00 28.80 100243 - BLUE PRINTS 9/5 10042431 4020353 414 - 263611 - 647110 -74125 0.00 7.20 0.00 7.20 58803 - XEROX BOND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 36.00 CHECK NO 559479 VENDOR 900050 - TRICIA MURPHY 212780 REFUND - PARKS, MURPHY,T. 111 - 156390 - 347290 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 REFUND - PARKS, MURPHY, TRICIA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 559005 VENDOR 130300 TRIPLE J 10042944 12729 322 - 183825- 763310 -00000 0.00 5,565.00 0.00 5,565.00 107619 - UPGRADE SOD, 9/14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,565.00 CHECK NO 559081 VENDOR 182050 TROPIC SUPPLY INC. 10042432 T10 -84192 001 - 122240. 652996 -00000 0.00 29.70 0.00 29.70 107086 - HVAC PARTS 10042432 T10 -84183 001- 122240- 652996 -00000 0.00 202.97 0.00 202.97 107086 - HVAC PARTS 10042432 T10 -84173 001. 122240- 652996.00000 0.00 19.38 0.00 19.38 107086 - HVAC PARTS 10042432 T10 -84021 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 15.17 0.00 15.17 107086 - HVAC PARTS 10042432 T10 -84172 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 208.41 0.00 208.41 107086 - HVAC PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 475.63 CHECK NO 559047 VENDOR 162300 - TROPICAL FENCE 16JI PAGE 150 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET VOUCHER 408- 233352. 652910 -00000 0.00 2,243.00 0.00 2,243.00 10043250 1066 105741 - MOTOR & WHEELS FOR GATE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.243.00 CHECK NO 559226 VENDOR 278670 - TRUGREEN 001 - 126334 - 646314 -00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 10042429 713444 106090 TREE /SHRUB 9/6 10042429 713442 001 - 126334 - 646314 -00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 106090 TREE /SHRUB 9/6 10042429 713443 001 - 126334 - 646314 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 106090 TREE /SHRUB 9/6 001 - 126334 - 646314.00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 10042429 713476 106090 LAWN CARE 9/6 10042429 713477 001 - 126334 - 646314.00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 106090 LAWN CARE 10042433 713481 001. 126334 - 646314 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 106090 LAWN CARE 9/8 10042429 713478 001 - 126334. 646314 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 106090 LAWN CARE 9/6 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.210.00 CHECK NO 559168 VENDOR 253060 - TRUTWIN INDUSTRIES, INC. 10042599 26982 313 - 163673 - 763100 -66065 0.00 6,165.56 0.00 6,165.56 100471 TRAFFIC MARKINGS 10042599 27097 313 - 163673 - 763100 -66065 0.00 1,008.58 0.00 1,008.58 100471 TRAFFIC MARKINGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7.174.14 CHECK NO 558950 VENDOR 18780 - U. S. GAMES 10042950 90744766 111 - 156332. 646315 -00000 0.00 76.05- 0.00 76.05- 058143 - CREDIT. 9/5 10042950 492161 111 - 156332 - 646315 -00000 0.00 146.25 0.00 146.25 058143 - ANCHOR & PLUGS, 8/23 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 70.20 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 559140 VENDOR 237480 - U.S. FILTER /DAVIS 10043174 7754046 504.40 408 - 233312 - 652310.00000 101 - 163620 - 653210 -00000 100919 104832 PIPE, 9/13 10041321 10043174 7712596 4,550.80 408 - 233312 - 634999 -00000 101 - 163620 - 653210 -00000 103735 104832 PIPE, 9/5 10042445 10043174 7760959 34,087.13 408 - 233352 - 652310.00000 101. 163620 - 653210 -00000 100891 PIPE, 9 /17- REF:PO #104832 10043173 10043174 7761027 2,640.00 408. 233312 - 652310 -00000 101 - 163620 - 653210 -00000 100919 104832 PIPE, 9/17 10043173 10043174 7737353 6,517.50 408 - 233312 - 652310.00000 101. 163620- 653210.00000 100919 104832 PIPE, 9/13 10043173 10042600 7408662 2,308.35 408 - 233312 - 652310 -00000 414 - 263611- 655100 -74023 100919 106117 UTILITY PARTS 2,308.35 CHECK NO 559139 VENDOR 237380 - U.S. FILTER /DAVIS PROCESS DIVISION 10043173 8913822 0.00 504.40 408 - 233312 - 652310.00000 10,294.20 100919 BIOXIDE, 7/25 1,562.40 10041321 8914228 0.00 4,550.80 408 - 233312 - 634999 -00000 4,550.80 103735 SERVICE MAINT F /SEPT 10042445 8914198 0.00 34,087.13 408 - 233352 - 652310.00000 6,352.50 100891 BIOXIDE 9/4 1,645.00 10043173 8913979 0.00 2,640.00 408. 233312 - 652310 -00000 2,640.00 100919 BIOXIDE, 8/3 6,393.75 10043173 8914398 0.00 6,517.50 408 - 233312 - 652310.00000 4,867.50 100919 BIOXIDE, 9/21 CHECK TOTAL 10043173 8914409 0.00 2,308.35 408 - 233312 - 652310 -00000 2,308.35 100919 BIOXIDE, 9/24 2,308.35 CHECK NO 559386 VENDOR 339960 - UDT- UNITED DATA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 10042443 13863 470 - 173435 - 764900 -00000 107231 - LASER JET PRINTER 16J1 PAGE 151 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 0.00 1,386.00 0.00 1,386.00 0.00 504.40 0.00 504.40 0.00 10,294.20 0.00 10,294.20 0.00 1,562.40 0.00 1,562.40 0.00 4,550.80 0.00 4,550.80 0.00 15,789.33 0.00 15,789.33 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 34,087.13 0.00 6,352.50 0.00 6,352.50 0.00 1,645.00 0.00 1,645.00 0.00 2,640.00 0.00 2,640.00 0.00 6,393.75 0.00 6,393.75 0.00 6,517.50 0.00 6,517.50 0.00 4,867.50 0.00 4,867.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 28,416.25 0.00 2,308.35 0.00 2,308.35 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,308.35 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6J 1 PAGE 152 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 559404 VENDOR 342850 - UNI -GLIDE TRAILER COMPANY INC 10042941 8/28/01 111 - 156332 - 763100 -00000 0.00 0.00 111 - 156332 - 762120.00000 0.00 15,700.00 0.00 15,700.00 107342 - 4 TICKET SELLER BOXES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15,700.00 CHECK NO 559401 VENDOR 342500 UNISOURCE WORLDWIDE 10042446 760241411 001 - 443010 - 652990 -00000 0.00 3,216.00 0.00 3,216.00 107210 - BONDED WHITE PAPER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,216.00 CHECK NO 559374 VENDOR 338010 UNITED ENGINEERING CORPORATION 10043386 #1 (RETAINAGE) 411 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 57,612.40- 0.00 57,612.40- 106019 THRU 7/27/01 (RETAINAGE) 10043386 #1 411 - 273511 - 763100 -70054 0.00 576,124.00 0.00 576,124.00 106019 THRU 7/27/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 518,511.60 CHECK NO 558951 VENDOR 18900 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 10042623 0000363979361/363797 001. 000000- 142900 -00000 0.00 89.50 0.00 89.50 101177 - SHIPPING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 89.50 CHECK NO 559237 VENDOR 282270 UNITED RENTAL 10041536 16990030 -006 408 - 253221 - 644600 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 101288 - HOSE RENTAL 8/17 -9/14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 CHECK NO 559389 VENDOR 340550 - UNIVERSAL DEVELOPMENT 10043104 #62 191 - 138785- 884200.33751 0.00 5,537.00 0.00 5,537.00 3600972009 E PERRY 107825 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.537.00 CHECK NO 559315 VENDOR 318860 - US BIOSYSTEMS, INC. 10042951 89179 408 - 233350. 634999 -00000 0.00 245.00 0.00 245.00 100561 - CHEM. ANALY, 8/24 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 153 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10042444 88736 114. 178975 - 634999 -00000 0.00 432.00 0.00 432.00 100485 CHEM ANALY 10042444 87892 114 - 178975 - 634999 -00000 0.00 246.00 0.00 246.00 100485 CHEM ANALY 10042951 89345 408 - .233350- 634999.00000 0.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 100561 CHEM. ANALY, 8/31 10042444 89335 114 - 178975 - 634999 -00000 0.00 287.00 0.00 287.00 100485 CHEM ANALY 10042444 89330 114 - 178975 - 634999.00000 0.00 287.00 0.00 287.00 100485 CHEM ANALY 10042444 87978 114 - 178975 - 634999 -00000 0.00 205.00 0.00 205.00 100485 CHEM ANALY 10042444 89336 114 - 178975.634999 -00000 0.00 328.00 0.00 328.00 100485 CHEM ANALY 10042444 87893 114 - 178975 - 634999.00000 0.00 246.00 0.00 246.00 100485 CHEM ANALY 10042444 89329 114 - 178975 - 634999 -00000 0.00 205.00 0.00 205.00 100485 CHEM ANALY 10042444 88032 114 - 178975 - 634999 -00000 0.00 246.00 0.00 246.00 100485 CHEM ANALY 10042444 88082 114 - 178975 - 634999 -00000 0.00 328.00 0.00 328.00 100485 CHEM ANALY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,180.00 CHECK NO 559253 VENDOR 289040 US HOME CORPORATION 10042442 REF: 28908 US HOMES 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 112.73 0.00 112.73 REF: 289508 US HOMES 10042442 REF: 289525 US HOMES 113 - 000000 - 115420.00000 0.00 17.73 0.00 17.73 REF: 289525 US HOMES 10043049 REF #289511 US HOME 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 92.73 0.00 92.73 REF #289511 US HOME 10042442 REF: 289518 US HOMES 113 - 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 92.73 0.00 92.73 REF: 289518 US HOMES 10042442 REF: 289522 US HOMES 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 17.73 0.00 17.73 REF: 289522 US HOMES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 154 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 10043049 REF #289522 US HOME 113 - 000000. 115420 -00000 0.00 17.73 0.00 17.73 REF #289522 US HOME 10042442 REF: 289511 US HOMES 113 - 000000 - 115420.00000 0.00 92.73 0.00 92.73 REF: 289511 US HOMES 10043049 REF #289525 US HOME 113. 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 17.73 0.00 17.73 REF #289525 US HOME 10042442 REF: 289503 US HOMES 113 - 000000. 115420.00000 0.00 7.73 0.00 7.73 REF: 289503 US HOMES 10042442 REF: 289515 US HOMES 113 - 000000 - 115420.00000 0.00 42.73 0.00 42.73 REF: 289515 US HOMES 10043049 REF #289515 US HOME 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 42.73 0.00 42.73 REF #289515 US HOME CHECK TOTAL 0.00 555.03 CHECK NO 559349 VENDOR 331850 - US LIQUIDS OF FLORIDA INC 10042601 280442 114 - 178971 - 634999 -00000 0.00 6,288.40 0.00 6,288.40 104809 - HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6.288.40 CHECK NO 559366 VENDOR 334260 US OFFICE FURNITURE 10042622 04DJ3569 001 - 443010 - 646440 -00000 0.00 650.00 0.00 650.00 OFFICE MOVE /REF105878 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 650.00 CHECK NO 559398 VENDOR 341810 UTILITIES SYSTEMS CONSULTING 10042940 9202001 414 - 263611 - 631400 -73071 0.00 9,631.10 0.00 9.631.10 107110 - PROF SERV F /AUGUST & SEPT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,631.10 CHECK NO 559142 VENDOR 237510 - VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL CHANGE 10042956 132408 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 24.86 0.00 24.86 059399 OIL CHANGE, 8/15 10042958 396948 521. 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 22.99 0.00 22.99 059397 OIL CHANGE, 8/6 10042957 397081 521 - 122410. 646415 -00000 0.00 22.99 0.00 22.99 059398 OIL CHANGE, 8/10 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042958 132014 059397 OIL CHANGE, 8/6 10042957 132162 059398 OIL CHANGE, 8/9 10042956 397159 059399 OIL CHANGE, 8/13 10042957 132212 059398 OIL CHANGE, 8/10 10042958 396956 059397 OIL CHANGE, 8/6 10042956 397179 059399 OIL CHANGE, 8/14 10042955 132786 059400 OIL CHANGE, 8/24 10042955 397399 059400 OIL CHANGE, 8/22 10042958 396953 059397 OIL CHANGE, 8/6 10042955 397571 059400 OIL CHANGE, 8/29 10042956 397206 059399 OIL CHANGE, 8/15 10042956 397251 059399 OIL CHANGE, 8/16 10042957 397005 059398 OIL CHANGE, 8/8 10042958 131927 059397 OIL CHANGE, 8/3 10042957 397028 059398 OIL CHANGE, 8/9 10042955 397517 059400 OIL CHANGE, 8/27 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 22.99 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521 - 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415.00000 0.00 521. 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415.00000 0.00 521. 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521. 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 24.86 0.00 22.99 0.00 22.99 0.00 25.61 0.00 24.11 0.00 24.11 0.00 25.61 0.00 24.11 0.00 22.99 0.00 22.99 0.00 22.99 0.00 22.99 0.00 24.86 0.00 25.61 0.00 24.86 0.00 24.86 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558860 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 10043248 61Y941410070477108 AUGUST 001 - 443010 - 641210 -00000 0.00 2.35 0.00 2.35 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.35 CHECK NO 559302 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 1 PAGE 156 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 101145 - PAGERS FOR SEPTEMBER SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 558952 VENDOR 19260 - VICS SHOE REPAIR VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 558981 VENDOR 115650 - VANDERBILT BAY CONSTRUCTION. INC. 105217 - BOOTS- DISCHLER, 9/7 10042999 9 301 - 110472. 762200 -80531 0.00 28,719.90 0.00 28,719.90 124.85 102784 - 5/26/01 THRU 8/30/01 124.85 104091 10042999 9 (RETAINAGE) 301- 000000 - 205100.00000 0.00 2,871.99- 0.00 2,871.99- 157.25 102784 - 9 (RETAINAGE) 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- JOSEPH, 8/30 10042999 10 (PARTIAL RET.RELEASE) 301 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 61,548.18 0.00 61,548.18 123.32 102784 - PARTIAL RETAINAGE RELEASE 123.32 102363 - BOOTS- BLANCO, 9/4 10042624 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 87,396.09 CHECK NO 558860 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 10043248 61Y941410070477108 AUGUST 001 - 443010 - 641210 -00000 0.00 2.35 0.00 2.35 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2.35 CHECK NO 559302 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 10043051 A2102038BI 001 - 454010 - 641150 -00000 0.00 6.05 0.00 6.05 101145 - PAGERS FOR SEPTEMBER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6.05 CHECK NO 558952 VENDOR 19260 - VICS SHOE REPAIR 10042182 906- 021/9060101648 521. 122410- 652140 -00000 0.00 123.25 0.00 123.25 105217 - BOOTS- DISCHLER, 9/7 10042624 90602219060101650 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 124.85 0.00 124.85 104091 10041532 906 - 020/9060101597 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- JOSEPH, 8/30 10042953 906 - 019/9060101625 001 - 172930. 652110 -00000 0.00 123.32 0.00 123.32 102363 - BOOTS- BLANCO, 9/4 10042624 9060101673 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 51.95 0.00 51.95 104091 10041532 906. 020/9060101596 490 - 144610. 652110 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 157.25 104953 - BOOTS- ALVAREZ, 8/30 10042953 906 - 019/9060101619 001 - 172930 - 652110.00000 0.00 123.32 0.00 1'23.32 102363 - BOOTS- REYES, 8/31 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042624 9060229060101655 104091 10042953 906 - 019/9060101618 102363 - BOOTS- HERRERA, 8/31 10042953 906. 007/9060101589 102363 - BOOTS- DOMINQUEZ, 8/28 10041533 906 - 023/9060101649 102755 - SHOES- RODRIQUEZ, 9/7 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101 - 163620. 652990.00000 0.00 001 - 172930 - 652110 -00000 0.00 001 - 172930. 652110 -00000 0.00 408- 233312 - 652120 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559080 VENDOR 180740 VINEYARDS UTILITY, INC. 0.00 10042946 ACCT #347, 8/01 123.25 111 - 156332 - 643400.00000 0.00 0.00 ACCT #347, 8/01 100.17 - CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559085 VENDOR 185990 VWR SCIENTIFIC 67.59 10042621 8566289 CHECK TOTAL 408. 253211- 652990 -00000 0.00 14.40 100991 LAB SUPPLIES 14.40 10042945 8577927 408 - 253221 - 652990 -00000 0.00 100541 LAB SUPPLIES, 9/10 10043249 8093772 408. 233350 - 652310 -00000 0.00 100563 CHEMICALS, 7/24 10043249 8412506 CM 408 - 233350. 652310 -00000 0.00 100563 CREDIT ON #8093772 CHECK NO 559156 VENDOR 246170 - W.E. JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO. 10042184 3393 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 100121 PARTS, 9/5 10042183 3390 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 100121 PARTS, 9/4 CHECK NO 558953 VENDOR 19370 - WALLACE INTERNATIONAL 10042948 FC62648 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 059390 - ELBOW, 8/29 16J1 AMT NET VCHR DISC 123.25 0.00 123.32 0.00 123.25 0.00 123.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 282.70 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 PAGE 157 VCHR NET 123.25 123.32 123.25 123.25 1.354.26 282.70 282.70 137.96 0.00 137.96 152.60 0.00 152.60 143.56 0.00 143.56 100.17- 0.00 100.17 - CHECK TOTAL 0.00 333.95 151.23 0.00 151.23 67.59 0.00 67.59 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 218.82 14.40 0.00 14.40 OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042948 FC62940 059390 - HOSE, 9/5 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521 - 122410. 646425.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559513 VENDOR 900080 - WALTER T. CRANT VCHR NET 212746 AMB REF.CRANT 9/24/2001 490 - 000000. 116004 -00000 0.00 0.00 AMB REF.CRANT 0030422 -1 257.00 0.00 CHECK NO 559152 VENDOR 241500 - WALTERS SWIM SUPPLIES, INC. 257.00 10042436 13768 111 - 156313 - 652110 -00000 0.00 0.00 58246 - LIFEGUARD JACKET 18.02 0.00 CHECK NO 558972 VENDOR 109110 - WASTE MGMT OF COLLIER COUNTY 160.00 10043197 1495295/0139494 9/01 495 - 192370 - 643300 -00000 0.00 0.00 1495295/0139494 9/01 101972 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 10043195 1484889/0141445 9/01 001 - 061010 - 643300.00000 0.00 1484889/0141445 9/01 10043198 1602415/0141770 9/01 495 - 192350 - 643300 -00000 0.00 1602415/0141770 9/01 101488 10043195 1484889/0141445 9/01 001 - 000000- 115400.00000 0.00 1484889/0141445 9/01 10043195 1478943/0141794 9/01 130 - 157710 - 643300 -00000 0.00 1478943/0141794 9/01 10043195 1484889/0141445 9/01 490 - 144610 - 643300 -00000 0.00 1484889/0141445 9/01 10043196 2431240/50895 6/01 195. 110406 - 634999 -10264 0.00 2431240/50895 6/01 104313 10043196 2431219/50893 6/01 195 - 110406 - 634999 -10264 0.00 2431219/50893 6/01 104313 10043196 2431215/50891 6/01 195. 110406 - 634999 -10264 0.00 2431215/50891 6/01 104313 16JI PAGE 158 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 15.55 0.00 15.55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 29.95 257.00 0.00 257.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 257.00 475.26 0.00 475.26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 475.26 122.06 0.00 122.06 56.04 0.00 56.04 86.69 0.00 86.69 48.00 0.00 48.00 230.68 0.00 230.68 18.02 0.00 18.02 160.00 0.00 160.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,041.49 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI PAGE 159 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 559100 VENDOR 196570 - WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 10042949 MEMB RENW'L- #1428597 408- 210155- 654210 -00000 0.00 108.00 0.00 108.00 059353 - MEMBERSHIP F /ROY ANDERSON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 108.00 CHECK NO 559381 VENDOR 339390 - WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION 10043176 106849 408 - 233352. 654360 -00000 0.00 268.25 0.00 268.25 057930 - TRAINING & OPERATIONS MATERIA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 268.25 CHECK NO 559224 VENDOR 276690 - WEATHER SERVICES INTERNATIONAL 10042625 328828 001 - 144510. 644620 -00000 0.00 147.00 0.00 147.00 SERVICE FOR 9/1 -30 REF #102563 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 147.00 CHECK NO 559203 VENDOR 264470 - WESCO 10042441 676063 408- 233313 - 655200 -00000 0.00 237.69 0.00 237.69 57936 SERIES RELAY 10042440 676068 408 - 233313 - 655200 -00000 0.00 376.15 0.00 376.15 53252 OVERLOAD RELAY 10042439 676846 408 - 233313- 655200 -00000 0.00 175.59 0.00 175.59 59110 COIL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 789.43 CHECK NO 559185 VENDOR 256920 - WEST GROUP 10043175 184 - 852 - 200/49068 001 - 454010- 654110 -00000 0.00 649.00 0.00 649.00 101138 - ACCESS CHRGS FOR JUNE 10043178 800121185 (Ml-454010-654110-00000 0.00 55.50 0.00 55.50 FL CASES V781- 782 /REF:PO#101138 10043175 184- 852 - 200/32514 001 - 454010 - 654110 -00000 0.00 561.00 0.00 561.00 101138 - ACCESS CHRGS FOR JULY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,265.50 CHECK NO 559331 VENDOR 324550 - WEST MARINE 10042434 9243 313 - 163673 - 763100.66066 0.00 449.82 0.00 449.82 58604 - SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558954 VENDOR 19660 WEST PUBLISHING CO 10042954 800122044 001 - 010510 - 654110.00000 0.00 777.00 0.00 101962 - BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559371 VENDOR 337490 WILCOX APPRAISAL SERVICES, INC. 10042943 8/20/01 FINAL PYMT 001 - 155110 - 631600 -00000 0.00 8,750.00 0.00 105860 APPRAISAL REPORT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559309 VENDOR 316740 - WILLIAM D LORENZ JR 10042450 9/11 -14 TRVL W.'LORENZ 111 - 178980. 640300 -00000 0.00 99.00 0.00 9/11 -14 TRAVEL W.LORENZ 10042450 8/20.9/17 TRVL W.LORENZ 111 - 178980- 640200 -00000 0.00 17.40 0.00 8/20,9/17 TRVL W.LORENZ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559086 VENDOR 186530 - WILLIAM J. VARIAN CONSTRUCTION CO. 10041544 #2 - 9/6/01 301 - 120435 - 762200 -80525 0.00 34,855.14 0.00 106408 - FINAL PYMT ON REMODELING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559514 VENDOR 900080 - WILLIAM R. NIENOW 212773 AMB REF NIENOW 5/18/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 305.10 0.00 AMB REF NIENOW 0122885 -1 05/18/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559006 VENDOR 130660 - WILSON, MILLER ET AL 10043153 0045496 109 - 182602 - 631400 -00000 0.00 592.00 0.00 104811 SERVICES THRU 8/31/01 10043006 0045027 109 - 182602 - 634300 -00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 100188 BAY COLONY ACCESS ROAD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 OCTOBER 02, 2001 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JI REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 559323 VENDOR 322200 XEROX ADVANCED BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 10041535 430 001 - 100130. 634999 -00000 0.00 984.00 0.00 107312 - TONER, 9/6 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559123 VENDOR 223690 XEROX CORPORATION 10041534 083959201 518 - 121630 - 644600 -00000 0.00 256.00 0.00 100144 - BASE LEASE CHG -7/23 TO 8/23 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559163 VENDOR 249650 XEROX CORPORATION 10042626 084115127 113 - 138900 - 634999 -00000 0.00 546.28 0.00 103974 - BASE CHARGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559320 VENDOR 321440 XPEDX PAPER & GRAPHICS 10042947 650- N298612 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 127.26 0.00 103585 - PAPER, 9/27 10042947 650- N298612 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 2.55- 0.00 103585 - 2% DISCOUNT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 559399 VENDOR 341870 YANEISY SANTOS 10042468 TUITION REIMB. Y.SANTOS 490 - 144610 - 654310 -00000 0.00 271.55 0.00 TUITION REIMB Y.SANTOS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558955 VENDOR 20020 - YOUNGQUIST BROTHERS, INC. 10042447 REF 288977 YOUNQUIST 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 REF: 288977 YOUNQUIST BROTHERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 558956 VENDOR 20050 - ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 10042437 89402861 111 - 156313. 652720.00000 0.00 397.65 0.00 58253 - MARINE KIT SUPPLIES OCTOBER 02, 2001 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 10042437 89402868 58253 - MARINE KIT SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED OCTOBER 02, 2001 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111 - 156313 - 652720 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 559050 VENDOR 164080 - ZEP MANUFACTURING CO. 10043199 64235849 408 - 210130. 652990 -00000 0.00 107866 - ZEP ARRESTER, 7/30 614 CHECKS WRITTEN 16J1 PAGE 162 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 78.40 0.00 78.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 476.05 508.20 0.00 508.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 508.20 GRAND TOTAL 0.00 4,294.582.41 Q: /Manual Checks /APMLOG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A/P Manual Check Log DATE ISSUED TO: CK # 9/28/2001 Sheraton World Resort 240 9/30/2001 Clerk of Courts 241 10/212001 Check Run Beginning 558852 10/2/2001 Check Run Ending 559516 16J1 F- 31J[411111ki 238.00 40.00 16J1 AGENDA Collier Soil and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors September 19, 2041 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call I Disposition of 8 -15 -01 Minutes 4. Reports a. Financial b. DC Report c. BCB MIL Quarterly Report 5. New Business a. Budget b. China Trip c. ROMA Process 6. Other Business 7. Adjournment Misc. Corres: Date:. L Iteim# I U J Copies To: 16J1 Subject to Board Approval Collier Soil & Water Conservation District Regular Meeting August 15, 2001 Supervisors present: Michael R. Ramsey, Chair Carmine Pittelli, Vice -Chair Stanley Weiner Supervisors absent: Sean Morton, Secretary/Treasurer Michael Simonik Others present: Nancy Hughes, Administrative Assistant Anthony Polizos, NRCS Bob Beck, MIL Team Leader David Rodriguez, MIL Team Member The meeting was called to order by Chair Michael Ramsey at 4:10 p.m. at the Collier County Extension Service at 14700 Immokalee Road. Motion was made by Stan Weiner to approve the minutes of the last meeting, seconded by Carmine Pittelli, motion passed. The Financial Report for July was passed out for board review. Stan. Weiner recommended that the District purchase work shirts and hats for the MIL Team with our name on the front. Nancy Hughes will check into this matter. Tony Polizos briefly went over the DC Report. The Soil and Water Conservation Assistance Program will not cover exotic plant control; thus three of the sign -ups have dropped out. Bob Beck gave a summary on the LWC MIL 3'a Quarter Report. During this time the LWC MIL completed 28 evaluations, all agricultural, one of which was a follow up re- evaluation. The agricultural evaluations were on large and small citrus groves in Collier and Hendry counties. The follow up was on a citrus spray jet system after recommended improvements were implemented. There was a significant increase in emission uniformity on this follow up. First item under New Business was the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with Malibu Lakes. Jeremy Sterk of Boylan Environmental Consultants had requested, on behalf of their client, that the CSWCD enter into a MOA to satisfy a requirement of their permit to provide off - site compensatory mitigation. After a discussion on various aspects of this project, Carmine Pittelli moved to adopt the MOA to Transfer Funds for Purchase of Land as Mitigation Compensation. Stan Weiner seconded the motion and the motion passed. Nancy will forward the signed MOA to Jeremy Sterk for their review. 16J1 Next item discussed was the FY00 -01 Budget. Nancy updated the board as to amendments that needed to be made to the budget due to the following reasons: Revenues: Needed to be increased to show approved funding for the LWC MIL 3' and 4' quarters and to show the grant fund for the 1 *9c and 2nd quarters of the BCB Urban MIL. Expenditures: Contingency Fund and Vehicle Expenses were added to the budget and the board needed to make line item adjustments for existing budget items. Carmine Pittelli moved to approve the amendments to the FY00 -01 budget. Stan Weiner seconded and the motion passed. Last item discussed under New Business was compensation to David Rodriguez for health insurance. After some discussion it was decided to pay David $75.00 /month for health insurance, retro- active to the date of his hire. Carmine Pittelli moved to accept this arrangement,' seconded by Stan Weiner and the motion passed. The next meeting of the Collier Soil & Water Conservation District will be held on Wednesday September 19th at 5:00 p.m. at the Extension Service at 14700 Immokalee Road. Meeting adjourned at 5:45 p.m. Collier Soil & Water Conservation Distrij 6J 1 09/18/01 Profit and Loss August 2001 Aug '01 Income Misc Income 610 - Sales Tax 620 • Shipping & Handli... 630 - Soil Survey Total Misc Income 600 • Florida Plats 640 • Interest Total Income Expense Office Expenses 730 • Office Supplies 740 • Other Supplies 750 - Books /Publications Total Office Expenses Payroll Expenses 701 • Employer FICA 702 • Employer MC Total Payroll Expenses 700 • Salaries Employee FICA Employee MC Withholding 700 • Salaries - Other Total 700 • Salaries 710 • Dues 720-Insurance 760 • Printing / Advertising 790 - Cellular Phone 800 • Vehicle Expense 820 • Miscellaneous Total Expense 2.10 5.00 20.00 27.10 35.00 11.82 73.92 261.38 84.78 25.00 371.16 376.96 88.16 465.12 376.911A :: 808.00 3,676.56 100.00 2,021.00 216.60 68.17 489.77 165.04 7,573.42 Net Income - 7,499.60 Owwe 4 16J1 DC Report Naples Field Office September 19, 2001 Land User Acres Location Irrigation Systems Ken Werner (EQIP) 2 NGGE Everglades Farms (design) 22 Hy858E Hedgerow Planting Ken Werner (EQIP) 1,089ft. NGGE Conservation Plans (revised or beina revised Ken Werner (EQIP) 5 NGGE Eddie Henderson (EQIP) 437 Hy858 Eddie Henderson (EQIP) 230 Hy858 Guy Masters (EQIP) 362 Immokalee Others *SGGE - Revised 3 years of water table well data to show in graph form. *Feasibility Team - Participated on the Natural Systems Committee to gather data and model natural areas remaining in SW Florida for the restudy. *Citrus Expo - Provided MIL booth and personnel for the 2 day event in Ft. Myers. *SGGE - Attended regular Interagency technical committee meeting. Final draft NRCS technical report is out. Will finalize in September. *BCB - Attended a Big Cypress Basin sponsored breakfast welcome for Henry Dean with co. commissioners, co. staff, environmental groups, and governing board members in Naples. *ROMA - Met with Jim Coletta, co. comm., to discuss purpose, benefits, etc. of ROMA. *CSWCD Personnel - Interviewed 2 applicants for the MIL technician's position. Made recommendation to hire Michelle Shafron. Anthony P izos District nservationist 16J1 BIG CYPRESS BASIN URBAN MOBILE IRRIGATION LAB Quarterly Report Second Quarter Project Year 2001— June 1 to August 31, 2001 Sponsored by: BIG CYPRESS BASIN OF THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT a COLLIER SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT usv4k NRCS NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE 14700 IDMOKALEE ROAD NAPLES, FLORIDA 34120 (941) 455 -4100 16J1 USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720 -2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250 -9410 or call (202) 720 -5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 16J1 Abstract The Second Quarter of Project Year 2001, from June 1, 2001 through August 31, 2001 continues the first year of the Big Cypress Basin Mobile Irrigation Lab ( BCBMIL). The BCBMIL completed 25 evaluations during the second quarter, one of which was a follow -up re- evaluation. The evaluations were of sprinkler systems at single- family homes in Naples and Marco Island, and condominiums in Naples. Most of these systems were rated as Poor, a few were Fair, and the one Follow -up re- evaluation rated Good. Potential Water Savings were estimated at 7.8 million gallons a year, and Actual Water Savings were calculated for the Follow -up, after recommended changes were completed, at .11 million gallons. Public awareness /educational activities included attendance at the Collier Environmental Education Consortium (CEEC) meeting, and the Water Symposium Planning Meeting. Staff introduced the BCBMIL to County and agency representatives and committed to participate in educational programming. Staff also attended the Irrigation Conservation Committee meeting. Reference to the BCBMIL and a photo of the staff in action appeared in the SFWMD Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Newsletter. Staff researched and purchased a digital camera and computer for use in planned educational programs. These 25 evaluations and public education/awareness activities represent one quarter of the project contract goals for FY 2001. It is anticipated that the contract goals will continue to be met in the third quarter. 16J1 SYSTEMS EVALUATED This report covers the second quarter of Project Year 2001. Twenty -five evaluations of sprinkler irrigation systems were completed, one of which was a follow -up re- evaluation. All evaluations were of single - family homes in Naples and Marco Island, and condominiums in Naples. System evaluations were completed using methods contained in the Mobile Irrigation Laboratory Urban Irrigation Evaluation Teaching Manual prepared by the USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service. System evaluations are rated based on the Distribution Uniformity (DU) of systems. The DU is a measurement of how evenly irrigation water can be applied to an area of turf. A DU of 85% is possible for a well designed sprinkler system. As DU decreases some areas of turf will receive less water while other areas are over - watered. Systems are often run longer to compensate for the uneven application of water. The DU can be measured through the use of a "catch can test ", when appropriate, and is more frequently determined through a thorough visual inspection of the system in operation and measurement of pressures and flow rates. RESULTS The system ratings for the DU values are as follows: Distribution Uniformity % Rating 80 and above Excellent 70 -79 Good 60 -69 Fair < 60 Poor Of the 25 evaluations, 19 systems were rated Poor, 4 systems were rated Fair, and 2 were rated Good (Chart 1), one of which was a Follow -up re- evaluation. The one Follow -up re- evaluation was completed after recommended changes were done to improve the Distribution Uniformity of the system. WATER SAVINGS Potential Water Savings are based on first time evaluations and estimate the amount of water that would be saved by making the recommended system improvements and/or following recommended irrigation scheduling guides. Potential Water Savings (PWS) for second quarter evaluations were estimated at 7.8 million gallons (23.87 acre feet) a year. Actual Water Savings are calculated from Follow -up re- evaluations. Actual Water Savings (AWS) for the one second quarter Follow -up re- evaluation was .11 million gallons (.35 acre feet). An analysis of the Potential Water Savings shows that the average water savings per system was 0.18 million gallons, or 188,000 gallons per year. As a result of mandatory Phase 2 Water Restrictions declared by the South Florida Water Management District, many irrigation systems have been adjusted to operate only twice a week, on specified days, and during the hours of 4:00 AM to 8:00 AM. This has reduced the quantities of water unnecessarily used by overly frequent operation and irrigating during the heat of the day, which can cause significant losses from evaporation and wind drift. The BCBMIL adjusts irrigation controllers, upon request, to comply with the current Phase 2 Water Restrictions. 16J1 Following is a list of common problems that were encountered which limited the efficiency of the systems evaluated: -Lower pressure than manufacturer's specifications -Poor overlap, improper sprinkler spacing -Turf and landscape area irrigated in the same zone - Sprinkler precipitation not matched -Mixed sprinkler brands or types -Leaks in pipes, laterals, sprinklers - Sprinkler overflow - Clogged sprinklers - Stream of water blocked by vegetation - Operating time too long -No rain shut -off device PUBLIC AWARENESS AND EDUCATION The Public Awareness and Education element of the BCBMIL project is designed to deliver the water conservation message to large groups of people to complement the education of individual irrigation system owners and operators during evaluations. During the Month of July the BCBMIL did on site evaluations with the Lee County MIL. The purpose was to exchange techniques, provide an opportunity for the new BCB Technician to gain exposure with other labs and to spark new ideas. As a result there are some tentative plans to be involved with the Edison Estate renovation plan. Also in the month of July, the BCBMIL attended a meeting of the Collier Environmental Education Consortium (CEEC) and is now planning on being involved as a guest speaker at the "Know the Flow" program scheduled for this October. The BCBMIL is also in the process of contacting organizations and resources to put on a one or two day event in which irrigation will be the center of focus. The goal of the event is to inform and educate residents of Collier County of the various ways they can improve the efficiency of sprinkler systems while saving water and maintaining quality turf and landscape. The BCBMIL Team Robert Beck has been the Lower West Coast Mobile Irrigation Lab (MIL) Team Leader since February 1996, and now also leads the new Big Cypress Basin MIL. He received a B.S. degree in Environmental Studies from Stockton State College. He was an Environmental Specialist with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection for 15 years before re- locating to southwest Florida. He is now a Soil Conservationist with the USDA — Natural Resources Conservation Service and serves as the chair of the State Irrigation Conservation Committee, which represents the fourteen MIL'S in Florida. David Rodriguez has been the MIL technician since June of this year for the Collie{Soil and Water Conservation District. He received his B.S. from the University of Central Florida, Orlando in Social Sciences Education. C 0 c� W 0 C� a 0 U .n ^y Q C as rn U Lr Cr U U 0 0 N it U .O i.l a 1 i. •1..1 �.1 e� O a O U d C r a c C �O .1�Z W 5 0 x a. Uz Q F a a 3 O a a 0 I 3 0 .�CL M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M w° M M M M ♦ M M M M M C7 0 0 3d' � u � h Q A v-, rn .n rn oo v, rn rn rn o .n o� rn v, o, rn a o 0 0 0 0 00 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C, o � a .n V C1 Vl 10 n O, V1 M N O� .!1 'O n 10 �fl O, V1 N V't �o n O, V7 01 h 10 n M 01 O. �!1 00 h h y„ O O O O O O V O O O It O O O O O M O h O O V1 O vNl YN1 .N/1 00 Mj 3 w r+ W W a000 00000S00w0000000 . n � A A E vi T tai O N N N vi C' O N N O� N --+ N Cl M M C M vi N y N `7 N Vl N O N O� M N N Oi N M O N N R N Oi v� N N N to M N M wl O� O N N O N O N N O N O N C N N N �'D C N N h N C'i MN , N 'O N M O N N M O Gw N N N �� p O N vti N N b N N �D _M M _M M M 00 00 00 M 'ct 00 C' o et ... 00 M 00 00 M 00 .M-. 00 00 00 00 V 6 u u u u u u u u u u U U U v u u u u v u u u v u u o w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w � a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a w w+ w� 6 W � W � W � W A. w u W u W u u u u u W u W u W u u u u u u W u u u u u u v c s y A « F x aCIO cn C/) cn cn cn &n Cn Ell) &n Ell C.1) C En En V) Ln cn tn En cn V O O O O O O O O O o M v, C o v, Cl v, o v, O v, O v, O v, O v, O o N 0 0 0 0 0 .-. Un p� V Q a. � � (A � � � w � w w � � � w w 0 k�, uh, tic, u�, u�, k�, uW, u�, u�, uw., u , uh, �.r�., �O n oo N 0% N O M --� M N M M M a M vi M W M n M m M O. M O et et N V M �{ et .n �D •� n � 00 V. p. 't p u a+ Q r N F � A O F .1�Z W 5 0 x a. Uz Q F a a 3 O a a 0 I fC�fil Key to Table 1. Undersized pump for number and type of sprinkler heads 2. Undersized pipe creating excessive friction losses 3. Higher pressure than manufacturer's specifications 4. Lower pressure than manufacturer's specifications 5. Low system pressure due to water supply 6. Different pressures between manifolds. 7. Poor emitter orifice uniformity 8. Poor overlap, improper sprinkler /emitter spacing 9. Small wetted area 10. Pressure loss due to inadequate pipe size 11. Application rate > soil infiltration rate (ponding) 12. Air in lines 13. Turf and landscape area irrigated in the same zone 14. Pressure variation due to elevation differences 15. Mixed sprinklers /emitters - precipitation not matched 16. Mixed sprinkler /emitter brands or types in same zone 17. Various riser heights in same zone 18. Missing /malfunctioning emitters or sprinklers 19. Missing /malfunctioning pressure gauge, regulator, valves 20. Leaks in pipes, laterals, tubes, emitters /sprinklers 21. Clogged filter 16J1 22. Missing/broken emitters /sprinklers 23. Sprinkler overflow 24. Clogged emitters /sprinklers 25. Stream of water blocked by vegetation 26. Variable crop spacing 27. Poor drainage, requiring water control 28. System used for frost protection only 29. Operating time too long 30. Operating time too short 31. No rain shut -off device 32. No soil moisture measuring device Follow -up Requirements 1. Not necessary. 2. Review and evaluate recommendations through computer modeling. Document changes implemented by cooperator. A redesign may be needed in accordance with NRCS standards and specifications. 3. Re- evaluate system in the field after recommendations have been implemented. ** Follow -up re- evaluation. Soil Type (Urban) CS Coarse Sand S Sand FS Fine Sand VFS Very Fine Sand NOTE: Evaluation and /or design may involve private consultants in cooperation with USDA -NRCS. [MII Public Awareness and Educational Activities June • The BCBMIL submitted descriptions and photos of the MIL to the SFWNID which appeared in the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan Newsletter. July • The BCBMIL attended a staff training session with the Lee County MIL. • The BCBMIL attended a meeting of the Collier Environmental Education Consortium (CEEC). • The BCBMIL attended the Water Symposium Planning Meeting. • The BCBMIL staff chaired the Irrigation Conservation Committee for all Florida MIL's held at the Collier County Extension Service. Agenda items included MIL methodologies and NRCS created software, future MIL funding, and a soils workshop. The BCBMIL Team Leader was re- elected as Chairperson, and the Technician was elected as Secretary. August • The BCBMIL staff researched and purchased a digital camera and computer for educational programs. • The BCBMIL staff began planning for a major workshop event on urban irrigation systems to be held in the fall. Sep 06 01 05:24p COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS "A PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BUDGET HEARING TO BE HELD AT THE FOUNDATION CENTER 8962 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA AGENDA Wednesday, September 12, 2001 6:00 p.m. p.I 16J1 ,Wqft NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM T O BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99 -22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS ". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING — BCC A. PRESENTATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2002 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION BUDGET. B. RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL AS THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ADOPTING SAME AS THE NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR PURPOSES OF UTILIZING THE UNIFORM METHOD OF COLLECTION. 3. ADJOURN Misc. Corres: Date: ALL__ l � Item# I Le 1 1 September 12, 2001 Copies To: Fiala � =- Hr"" Mae, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE SUITE 605 NAPLES, FL 34108 (941) 597 -1749 FAX: (941) 597 -4502 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE AT THE FOUNDATION CENTER, 8962 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 ON September 12, 2001 AT 1:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Update on the Clam Bay Restoration Project 3. Update on Clam Pass Dredging 4. Discussion Regarding the Scope of Services for Beach Renourishment Studies 5. Discussion on Removal of Seagate Drive Flap Gates 6. Audience Participation 7. Adjourn ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMOATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE DIVISION OFFICE AT (941) 597 -1749 AT LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEEING. Misc. Corres: Date:.. ). item# I b A 1 Copies To: 16J1 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE MINUTES - JULY 19, 2001 Naples, Florida LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Clam Bay Sub - committee of the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee met in Regular Session on this date, July 19, 2001 at 3:00 P.M. at the Foundation Center, 8269 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Mr. David Roellig, Chairman Mr. John Domenie Mr. M. James Burke Mr. George Werner ALSO PRESENT: Approximately eleven (11) Pelican Bay residents; Mr. Todd Turrell and Ms. Cloe Essex, Turrell & Associates; Mr. Kyle Lukasz, Field Manager, Pelican Bay Services Division; Mr. James P. Ward, Department Director, Pelican Bay Services Division; and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Discussion of Status of the Mangrove Restoration 3. Consideration of Beach Restoration 4. Audience Participation 5. Adjourn ROLL CALL Mr. Roellig called the meeting to order and asked that the record show all members present. Mr. Roellig explained that the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee has appointed a Clam Bay Sub - committee to look into Clam Bay problems and we will also look at the possibilities of beach renourishment for the beach in front of Pelican Bay. This is our first meeting of the new Sub - committee. There was a Sub - committee during the construction period about two years ago and after the construction was completed we found that the hydraulics appeared to be working as planned and in my opinion is still functioning quite well. The pass is getting a lot of water in it with each tide cycle. I was out canoeing some months ago and found with the incoming tide that going around some of the curves was pretty tricky because of the strong currents. There is a good deal of flushing going on. To be candid we have to realize that the mangrove situation, in my opinion, has not improved too much and in fact we have some areas of new die off. We do 1 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 have some areas of re- growth. It was felt that we needed to take a more concentrated look at these problems which time would not permit during a normal MSTBU meeting. Mr. Roellig continued that it is anticipated that the Sub - committee would meet once a month between the normal MSTBU meetings. What I think we would do as we did in the previous Sub - committee is to go into more depth than is possible in our regular MSTBU Meetings. DISCUSSION OF STATUS OF THE MANGROVE RESTORATION Mr. Turrell reported that we are done with the plantings. We planted some starter islands and different plots of grasses. We have been out to look at the results and as anticipated, some of the grasses are doing rather poorly, but some of them appear to be doing very well. I think it is the Spartina and/or Juncus that appear to be doing well. As long as that continues to do well and we get through the year and that is thriving this time next year, then it opens the opportunity to do an expanded planting plan if you wish. At that point we will bring photos of Juncus marshes so that you can see what that would look like out there. I think if we could get one of those grasses established out there it would improve the looks tremendously because you would not see all of the old mangrove stumps. You would just see a kind of a grass plain with mangroves in the back. From an ecological standpoint, those grasses in a lot of ways are just as good as mangroves. A lot of times those grasses serve as a precursor to mangroves. If the mangroves decide that they like it in there again, the seeds will get in there and out compete that grass and eventually a canopy of the new mangrove forest will take over. By planting the grasses you are not excluding mangroves and may even be encouraging them. The biggest news to me is that since the last phase of cuts were finished, the water is getting out of there much more efficiently. It is drying out at high tide, even at this time of year. I think what has kept that area so dead over the year is that at this time of the year when we get heavy rains and we get three or four inches of standing water in there, it stayed there and never drained off and at times it was almost hot to put your foot in it. It isn't surprising that nothing would live in that environment. Now that the water is draining there are Fiddler Crabs all over the place. Those Fiddler Crabs are burrowing holes everywhere, which aerates the soil; there is a lot of Batis and Saltwort growing and doing better. I am real encouraged about how things are changing in the die off area. I am concerned about the extent 2 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 of the die off which seems to be growing a little to the north or at least is becoming noticeable now. We are going to ask Mr. Lewis his opinion on that, but that is my only real area of concern at this point. Mr. Werner asked if there were channels dug in the northern area where the die off seems to be spreading? Mr. Turrell replied there are some, which were done around January. We are just coming into the monitoring and Mr. Lewis has monitoring plots as well as my firm. We will make sure that we look at that area where there seems to be additional die off and maybe those cuts that Mr. Lewis has done has stabilized it. We will specifically look at that. There are also areas, which have recovered very well, but unfortunately none of them are along the road where you can see them. There are some areas that are very visible on the aerial if you compare the old and new aerials. They appear to be in areas where Mr. Lewis did the cuts. We did the coronary by -pas with the dredging a few years ago, now we are getting to the capillaries and getting those all cleaned out. I am more encouraged now than I have been for the past couple of years with regard to the die off area. It has looked so horrible, but I see hope now. A year ago I was still scratching my head. Mr. Burke asked if recovery in the die off area means that there are mangroves showing some signs of growth? Mr. Turrell replied there is some mangrove growth; there is life. By recovery I mean living soil, instead of this sterile wasteland where we didn't see crabs or anything. That is a very good first sign. I think more than anything those flushing cuts are doing it. The water is getting out of there. Fiddler Crabs will move. The crabs can be under water during a high tide, but they cannot live under water. Mr. Turrell explained that there are also starter islands in the original permit, so we did nine starter islands. There are mangroves planted in those islands and they are probably six inches higher than the rest of the terrain and all of those mangroves appear to be doing pretty well. We may have success with not only one or more grass species, but with planting mangroves at a higher elevation. There is also a kind of testament to the fact that a higher CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 elevation might work better because there is a channel that has been there for a couple of years now, one of the first channels, which has white mangroves established and are doing great. They are growing on a little higher elevation adjacent to one of those cuts. We are throwing a lot of ideas around out there and it appears as if we are getting some return. Mr. Werner asked how high the starter islands are? Mr. Turrell replied six inches. They are ten feet by ten feet by six inches and are made out of soil that came out of the cuts. Mr. Roellig asked if there was anything other than grasses and mangroves in those plots? Mr. Lukasz replied we ended up putting in a few of the Buttonwoods, which are a close relative of the mangrove. Mr. Turrell stated that there are four different species of grasses, two of which appear to be doing well. There was not a source of white mangroves so we planted black and red mangroves. The white mangrove are what have come in on a voluntary basis, so I would not be surprised to see a lot of white mangroves growing all over the place just like they naturally recruited along the one channel. This time next year we will have some interesting data. Actually I think the time to plant is exactly when we planted and that is right before it starts raining for obvious reasons. Maybe the time to reassess this and decide if we want to do more planting is next spring, so that we have the summer to get it planted. Planting those grasses is not an inexpensive proposition. I did a little math with one of my biologists and you are probably talking about $10,000 an acre to plant little containers of Spartina or Juncus. We have a forty -acre die off area and if you wanted to plant the whole thing that is a pretty big number. If we are getting success, then maybe next year we plant an acre or two if you decide that you like it. If we can get the grass growing out there it will change how everybody feels about the looks of that, even without a new mangrove forest and it will be ecologically viable. Mr. Roellig asked if that grass tended to spread fairly fast or is it a slow process? 4 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE July 19, 2001 16J1 Mr. Turrell replied to get forty acres would take a long time. If it is ideal conditions and seeding, it can spread in two ways via rhizome or via seeds. I think you are going to have to do some plantings to get it jump - started. Mr. Werner asked if Mr. Turrell or Ms. Essex have had a chance to look at the Riley encasements? Mr. Turrell replied that I have not seen his monitoring report that he just finished and I have not looked at them. Mr. Roellig asked if we had a monitoring report? Mr. Ward replied we have a fax that indicated what his results are. Mr. Roellig replied okay, maybe it can be put in the Board package. Mr. Roellig stated that we have not gone into the Seagate Culverts and asked if there was any information on that? There was some talk that there was not much head difference between Venetian Bay and Clam Bay. Mr. Turrell stated that Mr. Humiston has given Mr. Lukasz a couple of memorandums, but I think that it is basically his position that because of the changes in the tidal regime created by the dredging, that the function of the Seagate Culverts may have been negated by the dredging. I think that Mr. Humiston, at least from a hydrologist's standpoint, would indicate that they are not realty doing anything. Mr. Roellig asked if there was any data generated on that as far as the change in water levels from one side to the other over a tide cycle? Mr. Lukasz replied there was one done in December, which was pretty consistent with what we had the year before, after the dredging. Mr. Roellig asked if someone went out and measured every fifteen minutes? Mr. Lukasz replied during one entire tidal cycle. Mr. Domenie asked which way was it going? Mr. Lukasz replied it could only go into Clam Bay. On the rising tide it goes north into Clam Bay, but it wasn't a significant amount. 5 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 Mr. Werner stated that I could remember that when we were talking about this we weren't sure if it was going to do a heck of a lot of good, but was pretty sure it was not going to hurt and could do some good. Mr. Turrell stated that I am not sure if Mr. Humiston has made a recommendation or not, but if you decide to take the flap gates off you can take them off. It is a changeable situation. Before anyone thinks it was a big waste of money to do, the old culverts were failing. You really needed to fix that anyhow. It is just a matter of whether you keep the flap gates on or not. From a personal observation standpoint, that is where Ms. Essex and I launched a canoe to go do some of our monitoring and in the old days without those gates the water would roar through there. There were all sorts of oxygenation and fish and things going on, but now the water kind of trickles through there. Mr. Roellig stated that I don't know if it is a function of the type of flap gate on there, but it probably takes a pretty good head difference to make those gates operate. Mr. Turrell replies yes and once again Mr. Humiston and Mr. Moore's Report indicates that because of the dredging there is not that significant of a head difference any more. Another observation that I have had is and I think we would all agree, that any water movement is good. Sometimes I look at those flap gates and I see it kind of trickling out three or four inches above the water level and I think are we holding back four inches which may not sound like much, but if you hold that back for twenty -four hours a day, over the years you are cutting down a lot of circulation. I would rely on our hydrographic consultant for that recommendation, but it would not hurt my feelings to see them go away. Mr. Roellig stated that I think that is something we would want to look at over the next couple of months and if there is some way to improve it, we just have to see what our options are there. I do not feel real comfortable with something in there if we are not sure what is happening. Mr. Turrell stated that you are an old Corps of Engineer's man and Mr. Humiston did a pretty technical memorandum specific to those culverts that may interest you. Mr. Roellig stated that I guess I had higher hopes for them. The few times I have been out there I have seen turbulent flow going through them, but it is pretty hard to determine by [y CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 eyesight the actual volume. You cold have turbulent flow and not a lot of volume. It is something we would want to look at during the next few months. Mr. Turrell stated that they might have been great if there was still the tidal difference that there used to be. Now there isn't. Mr. John Carlson — St. Simone — You talk about dredging having an impact on the tidal flow. Is that the dredging of Clam Pass or Doctor's Pass that you are talking about? Mr. Roellig replied Clam Pass. Mr. John Carlson asked who controls whether the valves stay on the culverts? Mr. Roellig stated that it would be the Pelican Bay Services Division. Mr. Carlson replied that is not a part of Pelican Bay. Mr. Roellig replied that Seagate Drive is one of our boundaries, so it is basically our southern boundary. At the time this plan was formulated, it was recognized that until all of the condominium construction it had been an open connection between Clam Pass and Venetian Bay. The thought was that we would want to ensure that we got as much water flowing through Clam Pass as possible to keep it flushed out, such as the tidal prism would be large enough to blow the sand out that naturally comes in with each wave action. Mr. Domenie asked if we would have to get permission from Venetian Bay, Save The Bays or any group like that? Mr. Roellig replied we did that a long time ago. Mr. Carlson replied I assume you have to go through that again to take them off. Mr. Ward replied no. Mr. Roellig replied I don't think so. What you have is the culverts on there, which are like a rubber elephant nose and with enough pressure the water goes through. They are basically held on with a strap, so they would be relatively easy to take off should we decide to do that. Mr. Carlson replied I understand they would be easy to take off, but you would be having an impact on Venetian Bay and the Seagate community, which is outside of Pelican Bay. Wouldn't you have to ask those people? 7 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE July 19, 2001 16J1 Mr. Roellig stated that it is my recollection that they were in favor of the installation because they felt the flaps would cause water at the upper end of Venetian Bay to flush out rather than just oscillate back and forth. That was their feeling and I think what we want to determine in the relative near future is how effective that has been. Mr. Domenie stated that if permitted, I would like to take ten minutes of the Sub- committee's time to make some general comments as well as comments on some personal observations from last week. Mr. Domenie continued that in my opinion the subject of mangrove rehabilitation and beach renourishment is very closely related and interdependent. Anyone who has walked Pelican Bay beach has observed the mangrove roots which protrude at various places at low tide. Some years before the beach renourishment took place at the Ritz, a backhoe removed stumps there. I am not a technician but this means that at one time in the past, mangroves were growing where the beach is now and they were not growing in the open Gulf, but in the protected backwaters. Perhaps the actual shoreline at that time was where we now see the sand bank at certain times. Perhaps Humiston and Moore can locate some old maps or nautical charts, which could confirm this. Is this all an indication that we are rapidly losing our beach? Further, those of us who have been here longer can still remember when Clam Pass was located about one hundred yards further south. Our shoreline is in constant flux. Something else I noted about twelve years ago, before the Strand was built, I used to walk north from the Sandbar restaurant in the direction of the Ritz. When I was about 3/a of a mile south of the Ritz the sand always felt soft at my feet and my feet would sink into the sand. Does this mean that at one time there was some form of humidity flowing under the sand linking the Gulf to the present die off area? I cannot answer that but I recall that and I believe that it was Ms. Essex who made a presentation she had obtained that rain failing east of the Trail was seeping under US 41 and was welling up as it hit compacted earth at the Strand. Who can confirm this data and does that tie in, in any way with my own personal observation? Is this a source of freshwater, which puddles in the die -off area? F CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE July 19, 2001 16J1 Mr. Domenie continued that now I would like to address the issue of mangroves. I am not a chemist, environmentalist, hydrologist or a trained observer, but I feel that I do have some common sense. In the past I tried to be informed by attending the MSTBU Advisory Committee and Mangrove Action Group meetings. As I understand it, there are three major issues, which we are trying to solve to save the mangroves. What to do about the Stormwater runoff, which may contain high concentrations of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, which may be killing or stressing the mangroves? What to do about the rain that falls and puddles in the mangrove area? How to bring more saltwater flushing into the entire area? With regard to the storm water that runs into the estuary, I have a very basic question, which no one has been able to answer. If this rainwater containing pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers are so harmful to our mangrove, is it not strange that the mangroves along the berm are not dying, but the mangrove most distant from the runoff die? Has anyone ever addressed this mystery? Has anyone ever provided an answer? I have always felt that this is a problem. Why not add an 2 x 8 eight inch board on top of all of the existing weirs, thus holding back a large quantity of fresh water after each rainfall, permitting the water to seep slowly into the mangroves? The MSTBU has agreed to pay W IlsonMiller to divert part of the storm water runoff to the south where it will find a shorter route to the Gulf. Is this necessary if the mangroves closest to the berm are not dying and how will the removal of the cattails affect the sheet flow of either rain or saltwater in that area? For those of us who go into the Sandpiper after crossing the main channel of the estuary, we see Clam Bay to our south. Until the recent channel was dug linking these two systems together there was no natural linkage except at very high tides, thus the water that accumulated in Clam Bay especially during the rainy season was all rainwater, not containing any herbicides, pesticides or fertilizers. If this is so and fresh water is the sole culprit of mangroves dying, why have we not seen these mangroves die? The next two problems of removing rainfall water from the die off area and bringing saltwater there are related. I assume that the weather here has not altered dramatically over the last fifty years, thus the mangroves in the die off area received little water during the dry season but received a lot of fresh water during the rainy season. Why did they suddenly die off? Did try CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 man, by blocking off Vanderbilt Beach Road, as well as the southern end of the estuary, cause or affect the die off or did the construction of the Strand cause the die off? Some years ago I heard a local historian speak explaining how Indians canoed from Estero to Napes Bay uninterrupted, now this is impossible. If the die off area is solely due to the fact that too much rain puddles and not enough saltwater reaches the area we can find a means of draining excess rainwater by digging channels. These same channels can bring saltwater to the area. This however assumes that Clam Pass, the arterial channels and the smaller channels are deep and wide enough to provide sufficient volumes of water to reach these areas. I seem to recall that within the last few months someone commented that the pass is still good, in fact it is 35% better than it was. It was terrible before the last dredging, so I ask is it now 35 % better than terrible and have we set specific goals as to when we must again dredge not only the pass, but well into the estuary? Do we dredge when the water flow gets down to 60 %, 40 %, 20% and who determines the desirable water flow volume? We have a ten -year permit in hand. Should we not plan today to dredge Clam Pass 200% as soon as the turtle season is over? I know the following comment will incur the wrath of every conservationist within earshot, but if there is too much fresh water, if there is not sufficient saltwater, if the elevation does not permit efficient draining and if soil samples do not provide conclusive evidence for the die off, shouldn't we be looking at other alternatives? We have already spent $2,000,000 without arriving at a firm solution. Instead, should we consider trucking in sand and topsoil, raising the level three feet, plant palms, palmettos and other native vegetation, import squirrels and other animals, lay out some foot paths and install some benches along the way? Then instead of looking at dying and decaying mangroves we would be enjoying a green panorama, which would still act as a buffer to any storm surge. Finally, who has noticed that as you walk or ride up to the Sandpiper and look north, you can now see the die off area in the not too great distance? Does this indicate that existing mangroves are losing their leaves and slowly dying? Who, if anybody, is monitoring this? I know that our colleague Mr. Bawduniak and a friend take periodic pictures, but would these indicate a slow die off? That is how my thinking has been. 10 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16J1 July 19, 2001 Since being asked to serve on this Sub - committee I determined that the first thing I need to do is see and feel he problem first hand and I asked Mr. Lukasz if he could provide such a guided tour for me. We determined that the best time would be to go in the morning to avoid the afternoon rain and at or soon after high tide, so that I could witness how effective the channels are at high tide. As a result Mr. Lukasz picked me up on the morning of Friday, July 13 for a tour of the die off area. I came prepared in old blue jeans and high rubber boots. I should have known that Friday the 13'h might not be the best day to enter the die off area. Mr. Domenie continued I am not a scientist or trained observer, hence the following are my impressions. Two things become apparent immediately when you climb over the parapet at the Strand and descend into the die off area. In first place, the atmosphere somehow affected my watch. After tramping and tripping through this area for what I thought was at least three hours, my watch had only advanced seventy -five minutes. Secondly, there are dozens of mean gremlins whose only purpose in life is to suck your boots into the mud and then pull them off as you try to step forward. Although I will admit to four such events, I am sure that Mr. Lukasz will testify that this happened ten to twenty times. I also must thank Mr. Lukasz again for rescuing me when I fell flat on my face in the mud when my shoes did not follow me. Although I had expected to see some water, this being the wet season, I was surprised at the amount of water everywhere and how soggy most of the soil was. Basically, only by stepping on dead twigs, braches or on patches of green Batis could you be assured of not sinking into the muck. One of the first items I saw was one of Mr. Riley's experimental `Tube Cities" as 1 call them. From close up Mr. Lukasz was able to identify the type of mangrove saplings in some of the plastic tubes. Frankly I do not understand how these saplings can survive. They sit in a narrow tube, their roots are about six to nine inches above the surrounding terrain, they get no sun, rainwater enters the pipe and the temperature inside must be stifling. Yet from the few that I observed close up, about 75% seemed to be alive with green leaves, yet these leaves were still about twelve inches below the top of the tubes and none of the tubes were showing any signs of opening at the seam. Please do not say that I stated that 75% of the plants were healthy. I only observed a hand full of the plants out of the hundreds planted in three of the plots, nor do I know when they were 11 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16J1 July 19, 2001 planted. Hence, the 75% quotes may be vastly over or understated in terms of all of these plantings. Mr. Turrell has expressed a different point of view. Mr. Domenie explained that the area is crisscrossed with channels, some newly dug. I observed that in three of these channels, about two feet wide, it appeared water was flowing slowly into the die off area. Remember this was about ninety minutes after high tide at the mouth of Clam Pass. This would indicate that salt or brackish water may be entering the area, or is it fresh water that is being backed up every time? I do not know what would have happened had I remained there for six more hours. When would the current reverse, how much would the water level in the channels drop and what is the salinity, if any, of the water? Frankly, I was not tempted to stick my finger into the water to taste it, but this information would certainly be crucial. Are the channels bringing saltwater into the area in addition to draining off rainfall water? I can't answer the question. Mr. Domenie stated that the next item which Mr. Lukasz very patiently pointed out to me were some of the ten or twelve starter islands. I had heard about these but had no idea what to look for. As best as I can describe is that an Island is a slightly raised area with freshly piled soil, raising the level about six to nine inches above the surrounding area. Each starter island was about ten x twelve feet square containing fifty to eighty, twelve to eighteen inch seedlings. Since they were all recently planted it was impossible for me to judge the effectiveness of this possible solution. Mr. Lukasz informed me that the starter islands were planted with white and black mangroves, but that is incorrect. However, I did notice that as we tramped through the wet muck at various locations you could observe small mangrove saplings growing. Most of these according to Mr. Lukasz were not planted by anyone, but represent new naturally deposited seeds. They were about twelve to eighteen inches in height and scattered around in various places, but all appeared to be on high ground. Don't be misled by my use of the term high ground. I am not referring to various feet of elevation, but ground that appeared to be an inch or two higher than the surrounding land, most of which was already covered by a green growth which Mr. Lukasz identified as Batis. We continued to an area where nothing grew and Mr. Lukasz stated that this had been one of the areas that had been lying under rainwater and it 12 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE July 19, 2001 [[aril covered a considerable expanse. It was not under water now but I did not venture to test its' firmness. As we reached the northern border of our trek we entered a narrow band of mangroves, all looking very fresh and healthy and reaching about six feet in height. This runs east/west and the bushes are located on each side of a channel that was cut a few years ago. You could not see the channel because of the dense growth and Mr. Lukasz told me that these grew naturally after the channel was dug. Mr. Lukasz then took me eastward towards the major canal, which had been dug and dynamited few years ago. Tall mangroves surrounded this water and I observed that the water was stagnant. No doubt the tide had reached its' high point at this location and would soon start to reverse and ebbing would begin. By this time I had been trudging, stumbling and teetering for over and hour and I was elated when Mr. Lukasz turned me southward again. However he still had one more area to show me, which was one of the eleven test areas that were started a few years ago by Mr. Lewis. I have no idea how many seedlings where originally planted nor how many survived, but frankly I did not see many. However there are three plastic capped pipes in this area that apparently are used to test the salinity of the water in and adjacent to this plot. I have not seen any data regarding this and what has this data been used for? Mr. Lukasz also showed me some of the grass test plots that had been planted. I was not impressed, as about 50% appeared dead or stressed, again, strictly the opinion of an untrained guy and only one or two such plots. At various locations there were PVC pipes, some only six inches high, others three feet high, there are wooden sticks with some form of calibration on them, white flags, red ribbons on trees and stumps. The various people involved in trying to solve our problem each have their own form for marking or delineating their areas. Mr. Domenie stated that he is on the Board of the Mangrove Action Committee. If this appears to be an area of conflict for the Sub - committee or the Advisory Committee, I will submit my resignation from the Mangrove Action Group. Please let me know your opinion. I know that many of you frown on the Mangrove Action Group, but I would invite each and everyone of you to attend one of their meetings. They do not have the financial resources that the MSTBU has, but right now together with the Conservancy they have agreed to invest money in a new instrument, which as I understand it will give us an accurate total analysis of the soil. 13 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 In summary, I still have many unanswered questions. My personal observation indicates that there is some natural rebirth, especially along older channels and on high grounds. As to the test plots, the jury is still out. My preliminary gut feeling is that many people with good intentions are trying to solve our problem, but do we really have a mangrove czar to whom all data is provided and who can digest this data and provide us with regular quarterly updates summarizing the works and opinions of all parties? I am sorry for the length of my comments. This is the first time I have had the opportunity of expressing my thoughts. Mr. Roellig stated that as far as the Mangrove Action Committee, I have no problem with that. I think it has been a useful Group. This is a public meeting and anyone is welcome to come and provide comments and information. We have heard about some of the work that you are doing with the Conservancy and we would like to have the Mangrove Action Group keep us informed and provide information to us so that we can integrate it into our programs. You have asked a lot of questions and there are two ways to answer those. Unfortunately with the Sunshine Laws it is hard to sit down and go over them with you one by one. The more onerous way is that there have been many reports prepared over the last two or three years that would cover these in one way or the other. We do have a Water Quality Report that we get annually. To basically summarize it is that the Report shows the analysis of the water in the lagoon and the east side of the berm and also the water on the Gulf side of the berm. It appears from the Reports that I have seen that the present system seems to be working pretty well. It is hard to tell about the pesticides. The fertilizers are being taken up as planned east of the berm in the lagoons. It is hard for me to answer all of your questions, but there are some reports that we might make available to Mr. Domenie. Some of us have been at this for a while and some come in with a new perspective and it gives us an opportunity to discuss these things in more detail, which is a major part of it. CONSIDERATION OF BEACH RESTORATION Mr. Roellig stated that he does not know how Mr. Turrell interfaces with Humiston & Moore, but in any case there is a report that I received a long time ago from the County and one of the sections is on the coastal environment in Pelican Bay. This was a precursor to the 14 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE July 19, 2001 Management Plan and one of the things I have taken out of there is a chart of shoreline changes. I took the most extreme one showing the shoreline change from 1885 to 1994, remembering that this report was dated 1995. As I mentioned in the MSTBU Meeting, over a long period of time we have had a very slow erosion loss. You can see on the bottom, just north of Clam Pass, over those 100 years or so, they show about thirty feet of erosion. On an annual basis that is not very much. The thing you have to realize when you look at a long period like this is that there are some decades where there may have been significant accretion. Other periods of ten to fifteen years there has been significant erosion. You have a long term average. You can't depend on it running back five or six inches a year, but it is a long -term trend. What we were looking at with our beach renourishment is that we have a situation where twenty years have passed and we may have lost maybe ten or fifteen feet of what it was back then and whether or not we want to have a ribbon of sand along these erosion areas is pretty much in my view what we would be looking at. I think we also have to realize, in my opinion, what is a very stable beach compared to other areas of the Unites States and the world, it's vulnerable to rapid change based on storms and other factors. One of the things that has happened since 1995 is the county -wide beach renourishment program where they renourished from Wiggins State Park down to Vanderbilt Beach Road and then from south of Clam Pass down through most of the City of Naples. I would think that would have some effect on the erosion rate. Mr. Roellig continued that my view on the beach renourishment is that there have been times when I have walked the beach at a high tide and it goes up to the vegetation. I don't think that is the case right now anywhere on the beach, but that does happen from time to time. My view of what we would be looking at with beach renourishment is doing some analysis of areas where the beach is relatively narrow and maybe for a segment of anywhere from a quarter of a mile to maybe a mile or so of adding some strip of sand along there to widen it up. I think that would be well received by the environmental community and the permitting people because you have to realize that this is a very important sea turtle nesting area. When the high tide goes to the vegetation line there is very little area for the sea turtles. While we have our own selfish reasons for having a nice beach, it would also be beneficial for the sea turtles. One of the things 15 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 we wanted to look at is possibly getting another proposal from Humiston & Moore to look at limited nourishment. This stretch of shoreline is periodically surveyed at about 1,000 foot intervals and there are reports put out by the County on this over time. I think what we want to do is have a analysis made of that and possibly depending upon the process, do our own interim survey to see how the beach is eroding or accreting as the case may be. It doesn't necessarily have to be done using survey techniques. The way I worked for many years on the Great Lakes is that there are techniques that can be used to measure the width of the beach and the angle of the sand towards to Gulf that are relatively inexpensive and in some cases we actually had volunteers go out and do it. I am not proposing that today, but that is something further down the road. I think we do need to monitor our beaches to see how they change with the seasons, etc. I think we would be advised to get some sort of a permit that would allow us to provide enough sand as is necessary to ensure that we don't have the high tide getting into areas where it would be eroding out our vegetation or, worse yet, some of our facilities. That is basically what I had in mind. Mr. Roellig continued that the other thing is that in the original proposal Humiston & Moore talked about structures in the vicinity of Clam Pass. Clam Pass is one of the few natural passes in this area. I personally do not think that is something that Pelican Bay should get involved in trying to provide structures for Clam Pass to basically train the pass in one specific location. It is something we could discuss in future meetings. There are certainly ways, if you go down to Doctor's Pass, of training a pass so that it will stay in one spot. You can make it a certain width to ensure that when the tide goes out you have flow go out at sufficient speed to flush out sand that may be brought in by way of wave action. That might be necessary at some point in time down the road, but I don't think that would be necessarily a type of project that Pelican Bay on it's own would take on. If anybody, it would be a kind of Collier County project. What I am trying to say is that I don't think we want to get into a big analysis of structural measures of training Clam Pass. I would look forward to possibly Humiston & Moore providing us with a revised proposal on relatively simple beach renourishment without getting into any 16 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 particular analysis in what I call training Clam Pass. I don't know how the other Sub - committee member's feel. Mr. Werner stated that he just wanted to make one comment about what Mr. Domenie said. Mr. Domenie said that we agreed to pay WilsonMiller to divert the runoff to the south. As far I know that has not been done. We paid them for a study. Mr. Werner asked that when we decided we wanted to participate in the landscaping of the US 41 median, did we have to amend the description of the Ordinance to include that in our jurisdiction for the Pelican Bay Services Division? Mr. Ward agreed. Mr. Werner asked where does our jurisdiction go toward the west and if it goes halfway on the beach and we start re- nourishing what are we going to have to do if we are going to participate in that? Mr. Ward replied that your boundary goes to the Coastal Construction Control Line. Mr. Werner stated that sounds as if it is on the beach somewhere. Mr. Ward replied it is on the beach somewhere. That is the defined line. Mr. Werner stated that if it were agreed that we wanted to do something, would they then also have to amend the description of our jurisdiction? Mr. Ward replied yes, I would think that we would have to do that. Mr. Turrell stated that with regards to the beach I basically agree with everything that Mr. Roellig said. If you start getting into structures you start getting involved in a very complicated, time consuming permitting issue. I think when you go back to Humiston & Moore and get more focused on the smaller scale thing I think you will be surprised at how low the numbers get. Mr. John Carlson — St. Simone — Mr. Domenie, I thought your letter was very well written, clear thoughts, good questions and I would like to follow up on your main point, which is that all the other activities don't do any good at all unless you can move the water in and out through the pass. That is crucial to success. Mr. Roellig earlier said that plenty of water is flowing through the pass. I believe if you go at high tide at any one time there is quite a bit of flow. The truth is that if you go down now and look at how much of the original pass was opened, it is probably `VA CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 25 % -30 %. We are not talking about a reduction of flow of 35 %, now we are talking about a reduction in flow, which is much greater than that. It doesn't flow directly to the pass anymore, it flows and then it has to "y' out. It is very constricted. I don't see how any of the other measures can continue to be successful if we don't increase the volume of flow through the pass and the only way to do that today is to re- dredge the pass. The only thing that makes any sense to me in this whole business is that we establish a date; my preference would be November 1, for every year going out and re- dredging the pass. I am told the arguments against that are that you would cause a lot of expense because they would have to set up the dredging equipment every year. I believe that you would have less dredging equipment to set up if you did it every year rather than if you waited until the pass is almost closed as it is now. The other argument against it is that it will be require an extended development time. We have to go ahead and plan and then do it. I am saying establish a date. Do a date now and have that date go on for the next ten years. That is how long our permit is good so let's go and see what that kind of treatment of our problem brings. As it is now we are dealing with slight increases in elevation of these islands, we are trying to plant different grasses, we are planting mangroves in tubes and other methods, we are digging channels, we are talking about beach renourishment or perhaps adding materials to increase the height of these islands. The reality is that if we don't move water in and out with great efficiency, it doesn't make any difference whether we have Seagate flap valves open or we have a new pass through Vanderbilt. None of that makes any sense unless you really open the throat and the throat is nearly closed now. What do we do wait until the throat gets closed? What does 35% reduction mean? Does that mean 35% reduction from the ideal flow? We don't know that. We don't know what the ideal flow is and will never know what the ideal flow is. That is not a number that anyone can sit down and calculate or a number that we have any historical values for. We do know that there have been changes in the infrastructure caused by all of the construction from Vanderbilt north. We know that the mangroves are dying, maybe more now, maybe less now. We know we are trying to do some other things. All of those things are valuable, but if we don't increase the flow through the throat it will not make any difference and then you can't compare apples to apples and make your numbers meaningful. CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE July 19, 2001 16J1 Mr. Roellig replied that we do have periodic surveys of that and know how it changes from time to time. I can also tell you that we already have money set aside to do the dredging at the end of turtle season. I am not sure it will be exactly the first of November, but the County, which should do the job, has set money aside, which is primarily coming from the Tourist Development Tax. This is an on -going situation that we do look at. It is surveyed on an annual basis. We are looking at it and financial plans have been made to do the dredging assuming it is necessary, which it certainly appears this time for something after November. Mr. Werner stated that we have a permit, but just because we have a permit does not mean that we can go out and dredge it anytime we feel like it. We still have to show that there is a need for it. I don't think you can schedule it and say we are going to need it every year. Just because we have the permit does not mean that we can do whatever we want. We still have to get their approval. Mr. Logan replied there are different ways of establishing what your need is. It is often the matter of the language you use and what you are trying to achieve. My proposal is that what we try to achieve is a ten -year plan during which we don't decide okay now the pass is closed down 50% or some magical number based on no real knowledge, but that every year we are going to go out and do it on a certain date. At the end of our ten -year program we will at least have some sort of hard numbers. If you do it in June this year and in November next year and October the year after that, you will never have data. data. data. Mr. Werner replied you are going to be limited to when the turtles are not on the beach. Mr. Logan replied if you spread it out, you would never be able to get good comparative Mr. Roellig stated that this has been studied over the last few years and we have a lot of Mr. Logan replied yes, and the mangroves are still dying. Mr. Roellig stated don't switch the question. You asked about the pass. I am not trying to be argumentative. If you want to talk about the throat of the pass we will talk about that. The plan is that there has been quite a bit of analysis on that. There is periodic surveying and funding 19 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 scheduled for that. If there are areas that you would be interested in looking at reports, perhaps we could make them available. It is not a situation that we are not looking at because we do have periodic surveys, we do go through the process of seeing that money is scheduled and I might add that this money is not strictly speaking from Pelican Bay, it is part of the Tourist Development Tax money that the County distributes for various beach projects because they recognize that Clam Pass is a County asset. It is an area where you could always do more study, but there have been extensive studies of what an optimum cross - section would be for the pass for the amount of water that can come through it and flush the estuary system. Mr. Logan asked when the last survey was done? Mr. Lukasz replied in January. It is done on an annual basis, but we did two, post storm analysis surveys of the Pass. One was done in October and the other in January. Mr. Roellig stated that I would assume that this year because we had already gone through the efforts of scheduling the money for dredging we would do some surveying in October because you obviously need that for construction drawings. Mr. Lukas stated that the annual survey is going to be done within the next week or two and that data will be used for the bid specifications that will put together for dredging that will be done in November. Mr. Carlson asked if that was a commitment to dredging or what do we have to do? Mr. Roellig replied as much of a commitment as anybody can make. Money is set aside. Mr. Werner stated that what I said was that we have this permit from the Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Natural Resources and just because we have the permit does not mean that we can go out and dredge whenever we feel like it. We don't have to go through all the formal steps we had to do to get the original permit, but we still have to provide justification to these agencies for the dredging. Mr. Logan asked if we believe we have justification? Mr. Ward replied yes. Based on the January survey there was a reduction in flow and that was the basis that we used to go ahead and plan to have the pass dredged in November. The survey data that is collected this month will be used for the bid specifications. The bid 20 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 specifications and survey data will be submitted to the State to show them what we propose as far as dredging the pass. Mr. Logan stated that I don't mean to be argumentative, but I must be missing something. What I am hearing is that based on the data, which was generated in January we knew that we needed to dredge. Mr. Ward replied no. We generated data in January; generated additional data subsequent to storm events where we did more data analysis that showed a reduction and the consultants recommended that we go in and dredge. We can't do that until November because you are in turtle nesting season. We are going through the process now of collecting the balance of the data that we need, applying to the regulatory agencies, we have applied to the County for funding for the project and it has gone through a couple of the processes. It has one final step to go through and that is to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. We will bid it, award the bid, sign contracts and hopefully start construction in November. Mr. Domenie asked if that permit is only for Clam Pass or does it include 200 yards into the estuary. Mr. Lukasz replied it is approximately 700 feet into the estuary. Mr. Roellig stated that the permit is for the management area, so we are talking all of Clam Bay. Mr. Domenie stated that there is something else to defeat our argument and that is if we get a storm in December, which could close up the pass and we would then have to get ball rolling to open it again at that time. Mr. Roellig stated that you have to recognize that when you are on a sandy beach it could close at any time. The mouth can move, it can open up by itself; it is a very dynamic situation. Mr. Domenie stated that we would not have to go through what we did in 1992/1993 where it closes up for months. 21 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 Mr. Roellig stated that it is a constant struggle with nature trying to flush the pass out and the waves are trying to put sand in the pass. They work back and forth and are fighting each other and we try to intervene to try to keep it open. Mr. Logan replied right now the waves seem to be winning. If it did close this weekend, how long would it be before we could open it? Mr. Domenie replied November 1. Mr. Ward replied that is real iffy, but there are provisions in the permit that we could go in and do an emergency opening, but that does require some assistance from the regulatory agencies which at this point in time would not be difficult to obtain. Plus, we would have to figure out how to pay for it and get the approval from the County to do it. I can't tell you if it is a week or a month, but it is possible. Mr. Roellig stated that if something has just plugged it a backhoe might do it or a relatively minor piece of equipment. Mr. Burke asked when the pass closed last? Mr. Roellig replied about three years ago. Mr. Ward replied that the major dredging was three years ago and we do the survey every year. Based on that survey it gets evaluated then we look at it in the context of what happened in the original dredging through now and the consultants make a determination of whether you should do it every two or three years. Right now it looks like it is on an every three - year schedule based upon the data, which has been generated from three years ago through today. That gets evaluated every year and we update that and advise the Advisory Committee as to what to do in the future. It looks like we will dredge this year and be okay until the third year when you will have to do it again. It appears to be on a three -year schedule versus what was happening was that it went from five years to three years to every year. Now, through the restoration program, we have been able to extend that back up to a three -year time schedule at this point. 22 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 Mr. Logan stated that if you have not been down to look at the pass over the last three or four days you might try to do that. The thunderstorms last week have had a big impact and it seems to me that it gets closer to being closed up as smaller storms have a larger impact. Ms. Cloe Essex — Turrell & Associates — It has probably closed up every few years during its' existence. We just cannot go out there and make it a big deep pass and say that is going to fix the mangrove problem. Nobody can say what caused that die off. You mentioned a Mangrove czar. I keep thinking about our role in the project and there are lots of people who have opinions and many people's opinions are valuable as many people have good points to make. We can't necessarily have one person say this is the right thing. What we try to do is listen to everyone and make our best guidance decision. Mr. Logan asked if the pass were to close permanently would the mangroves live or die? Ms. Essex replied in this situation they would probably die. How long it would take we cannot say that. What we have tried to do over the past year is try all of the different options such as plantings, starter islands and keeping up the experimental approach. We can come to a year after this point and say what did or did not work and then we can move to the next step. Where we are going to be going now is to look at the water management system. We have already started to think about that with the reconnection and adjustments to Systems III and IV. That is where we need to keep our minds focused, but we are going to give these starter islands and plots a summer to establish themselves. Mr. Werner asked if you are the czar? Ms. Essex replied there is no czar and no one can be the czar. If you had a czar you may not always like what they had to say. Mr. Domenie stated that when I said czar, I meant one person responsible for gathering all of the information and disseminating it to this group. Ms. Essex replied in that case it would be us. Mr. Turrell is the project manager that is working with the consultants and listens to their opinions and comes to a unanimous decision about what we should do and that is what we will continue to try to do for you. 23 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 Mr. Domenie asked if we have to take a vote on what we will recommend to the Advisory Committee as far as the beach renourishment? Do we want to go back on the second letter that we received from Humiston & Moore? Mr. Roellig replied that I think we need another proposal from Humiston & Moore. Maybe I need to get together with Mr. Lukasz and Mr. Ward to talk about that a little more. My understanding is that Humiston & Moore has an open contract with the County. They have negotiated labor rates and we just call on them to provide us a scope and estimate. I would prefer a little more detail to bracket out the survey work items so that we can evaluate it a little better. Mr. Domenie asked are we talking about the whole beach or only about one mile, which would be a half -mile on each side of the Sandpiper? Mr. Roellig replied that I think what we would want, and I do not want to make a final decision or maintain a motion, is ultimately we would want an open ended permit if we could get one that would allow us to add sand in small increments as needed. My personal view is that we are not looking at a big beach renourishment project for Pelican Bay. As time goes by there may be hot spots that need some sand and we should have a permit to be able to do that. Mr. Domenie stated that I am not talking about the permit. I am asking what are we going to ask Humiston & Moore to do, the whole beach or only a half -mile north and south of the Sandpiper? Mr. Roellig stated that what I think we would like to have them do is an analysis of the whole beach. There have been surveys at 1,000 foot intervals and we want to have that analyzed to see where we are having problems and then come up with a permit proposal that we could get a general permit to add small increments of 20,000 — 40,000 cubic yards of sand that we could use on an as needed basis. Mr. Domenie asked what are we going to ask of Humiston? Mr. Roellig replied to look at the whole beach. Mr. Domenie stated that they made the proposal for $95,000. Do we want them now to do a reduced proposal? 24 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 Mr. Roellig replied that we are a small segment of the Collier County beach and we do not have to do these big scientific studies. Mr. Werner stated that the first step is to find out if we are of a mind that we as a private entity can renourish a State beach legally. Secondly, I don't see this ending up being a small project. I see this in the millions. Once we make up our minds or get community consensus that we want to be involved in this as far as funding it, once we commit to it we are not going to get help from anybody. We have decided that we are not going to get help from the State or County because it is more or less a private beach. I am wondering if there are other avenues that we can pursue for assistance with the funding of it. You know that as soon as we commit to it and are willing to pay for it, nobody else is going to chip in. I would kind of like to make sure that we are not overlooking something. Mr. Domenie stated that we are getting ahead of the story. My question is what sort of study, I am not talking about permitting or funding, and we were only talking about Humiston's $95,000 proposal. What do we want them to come back with? Mr. Werner stated that if we couldn't do it anyway, why waste their time? Mr. Jim Bush — Member of the Foundation Board — You say that you cannot get County financing, but I read in the paper a few months ago that Hideaway Beach in Marco has County funding for its' renourishment. Hideaway Beach is more of a private beach than Pelican Bay and I was just wondering the difference? Mr. Roellig replied that I am on the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee and I have worked on beach projects over the years. The general criterion for getting public money on a beach such as ours where it is a public beach and anybody can walk on our beach. The problem is to get public money you have to have public access. Public access is defined as a parking area where people can park and get to the beach and when they get to the beach they can go a quarter of a mile either way for public access. Hideaway Beach comes up all the time and particularly now it is not accessible to the public, but there is a history there. As I understand it, there was a time when the beach did connect to Tigertail Beach and people could walk there. I believe one of the projects that the Tourist Development Funds are going to be approved for is to 25 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 provide access to Hideaway beach via a boardwalk. As I recall the estimate was $400,000 to provide this access. Hideaway Beach is a little different in that they were part of the Marco Beach renourishment back in the early 1990's so there is some precedent. In addition, we have a Marco channel that goes by there and the feeling is that that dredging has caused the sand to wash away from Hideaway Beach. There is sort of a cause and effect between the dredging of the pass and the erosion to Hideaway Beach. Whether or not you agree with it or I agree with it is another matter. There is some precedent and some cause and effect to public dredging that have aggravated their situation. I can tell you that the budget for next year has money for Hideaway Beach and currently there is some dredging going on in that pass and pumping some of that sand on shore. I don't want to say that you couldn't get public access here. It is a matter of what the people of Pelican Bay want. If we turned the Commons over to them as a parking lot and provided tram service, I could guarantee you that they would put all the sand we could ever want on that beach. We would be paying a price we may not want to pay. Mr. Bush stated that I am certain as a former member of Hideaway Beach that the Hideaway people are not interested in that becoming a public access. Mr. Logan asked what would prevent us from going to the County to ask them to help us before we do it? Do we have the ways and means to approach the County? Mr. Roellig replied what you have to do is be willing to provide access to the beach. That does not mean people walking in from five miles away. Basically you have to provide some parking or something where people could reasonably get to the beach. Mr. Carlson asked if there are other places in the County? Mr. Ward replied there are only two. If you want TDC Funding you have to be able to access the beach restoration area within one quarter of a mile would essentially preclude all of Pelican Bay with the exception of an area one quarter mile north of the existing County beach facility at the south end of Pelican Bay and one quarter mile south of Vanderbilt Beach Road would be eligible. Anything in between that would not be available. That is the same for State Funding. There are grants available for beach renourishment projects and those grants are all CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 tied to beach access and you have to have beach access within a certain relatively minimal distance of your restoration project in order for it to be qualified. Mr. Werner stated that maybe we could go to the Sea Turtle Foundation or something like that, which they would probably like for not having public access. It sounds funny, but if they want a wide beach for the sea turtles, help pay for the sand. Mr. Burke stated that we had a member at the last meeting who was talking about pursuing other organizations or interested people for some help. Mr. Roellig stated that we could go to the Kressge Foundation or the Ford Foundation, who knows, but I would say the odds are small. To say you can't is something I cannot say, but the chances are beyond normal. Mr. Burke stated that I want to come under Mr. Domenie's cloak of immunity. I am not a hydrologist. Where has it been established that we need beach renourishment? Maybe I haven't dug through the materials deeply enough, but I saw some letters from other residents of Pelican Bay saying we need it done and I do walk the beach quite a bit and I cannot tell that it needs it. Mr. Roellig replied that at the present time there is not a pressing need. I can recall maybe a year or so ago walking north of the Sandpiper at high tide and there was water on the beach up to the sea grass. That is not good, but since then there is more sand there now. The problem is if you have a problem it either gets too narrow and if you don't have a permit it is going to take a minimum of one year to get that permit. We need to start planning for the periods when we may need renourishment, but without a permit we are dead in the water. This is basically what we would want from Humiston & Moore is some kind of analysis of what kind of incremental nourishment we would need. I would favor ultimately getting the authority of putting it on the beach and have the authority available if we need it and just use it on an as needed basis. Right now the beach is pretty, good. Mr. Werner asked if once you get that permit you are going to be committed to doing some of this work? Mr. Roellig replied that you could have a permit and not use it. 27 CLAM BAY SUB- COMMITTEE July 19, 2001 16J1 Mr. Ward replied that in beach restoration you can have a permit and not use it and it just expires. It is different than a mangrove permit. Mr. Domenie asked if Mr. Werner is saying that we should not proceed with any sort of study from Humiston & Moore unless we know that we can get funding? Mr. Werner replied no. I was saying we ought to find out if we legally can do it and have a little more proof that the beach needs or will need renourishment in the near future. Mr. Ward stated that since I know Mr. Huber who is the Beach Guru for Collier County is in the room today listening to us, the one nexus that I think we ought to explore with the County on beach renourishment is the fact that this happens to be next to the Clam Bay estuary system, which is a part of that Natural Resource Protection Area. There may be an ability or opportunity to make a nexus to the beach restoration with respect to the inclusion of the NRPA in the County's Comprehensive Plan and funding from that perspective versus through this other mechanism that we have been talking about. I tend to agree with Mr. Werner and we need to get past step one first and then talk about what Mr. Roellig wants to talk about and that is to explore the other alternatives at that point. I don't hold out a lot of hope, but it is the only nexus that I can legally think of at the local level, with respect to beach renourishment, other than the TDC Funds. Mr. Carlson speaking from his seat in the audience was not legible on the tape. Mr. Roellig stated that the County has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars finding a sand source that the regulatory agencies would allow us to use. It is a land source. For the kind of nourishment that we would do, there is no way that you could do it from a hydraulic dredge in the Gulf. In my experience when you use a dredge. the first check is $1,000,000 to bring the dredge in and after that you start paying for the sand. I don't think we would ever agree on such a major program if we would end up that way. In a sense we are getting some support from the County indirectly by them going ahead and finding sand sources where we could purchase the sand and have it trucked to us. How we get it onto the beach is another story. At the present time there is an approved source, we know how much the County paid, which is about $18.00 per cubic yard in place. If this question came up a year or so ago I would not even want to discuss it because at that time they did not have an approved source and in fact the source had been CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 disapproved. Since we are a division of the County and looking toward the future I think the County will find additional sources of sand that we can basically piggyback on them finding the sources and getting approved and we buy the sand and have it trucked. That sounds like it would be feasible, but that is my general feeling of where we would be long term. Mr. Carlson speaking from his seat in the audience was not legible on the tape. Mr. Werner stated that what Humiston and Moore said was that if you did not put in some kind of structures to hold it back and you renourish the south beach it will fill up the pass again more quickly. Moore. Mr. Domenie asked what our next step is now? Mr. Roellig stated that I would hope that we could get another proposal from Humiston & Mr. Domenie asked if Mr. Werner would agree with that? Mr. Werner replied that is fine. Is there some way that we can be assured that we are legally able to do that? Mr. Ward stated that he would handle the legal issues with the County Attorney's office. I will also work on getting the revised proposal from Humiston & Moore and will work with your Chairperson to make sure that the scope is consistent with what we talked about today. Mr. Roellig stated that we have four members on this Sub - committee and that means that a quorum is three. At the next meeting I will propose to Mr. Vlasho whether or not we can add an additional member. If we had five members, the quorum would still be three, but from past experience people travel and it is a problem getting people together at times when you only have four members. I. would prefer another member just for quorum purposes if nothing else. If there is a MSTBU Committee member who would like to serve we could find that out. On the past Sub- committee we had Pelican Bay residents and even representation from the County. Unless someone has an objection; I would like to see us have five members. Mr. Werner asked if you need more than half for a quorum? Mr. Ward replied you need a majority of those on the Sub - committee. 29 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 Mr. Werner stated that again, I think it is great that you add someone else, but let's remember I specifically asked the question of the County Attorney. You do not have to have a quorum to conduct a meeting. All you have to do is have a quorum to make any decisions, motions or anything like that. You can always conduct a meeting without a quorum. Mr. Roellig replied that's true. Mr. Ward stated I am aware of that and there are ninety -nine other lawyers that will disagree with that opinion. Mr. Roellig stated that normally the Sub - committee would not have a lot of motions or decisions. Mr. Domenie stated that the decision would be to take something to the full Advisory Committee, perhaps. Mr. Roellig stated that we could do that by discussion. There is a way around it. Mr. Roellig stated that l am going to be gone most of August. I believe our next meeting will be in September, but we can discuss that at the Advisory Committee meeting? Mr. Domenie asked if there was anybody that Mr. Roellig had in mind? You have mentioned someone who was not on the Committee who was a resident. Mr. Ward stated that he had this discussion with the Chairman and he has tried to limit Sub - committees to members who are on the Advisory Committee, so we would not get into a debate. That is why the four of you are on this Sub - committee and there are four on the other Sub - committee, but they are all Advisory Committee members. I agree with him on that concept. Mr. Roellig stated that we will discuss it and whether or not we get another member remains to be seen. Experience kind of indicates that it is hard to get a quorum. It is nice to have a quorum then there is never any question about what happens. You can have informational meetings, but you then open yourself up to questions. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Mrs. Alice Kaye Potter — Grosvenor — I think you are aware that my balcony overlooks the mangroves and every day I do see more deterioration. 1 see more hot spots. I am thrilled with all of the work that is being done in the north. I am just praying that it will work, but I am thinking if 30 CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI July 19, 2001 there is something we could do to halt the deterioration in the south before it becomes as bad as the north. I wonder if we are focusing any efforts there? Mrs. Potter continued. Ms. Essex you said you were going to check that spot that I showed you, which was hit by lightening. Ms. Essex replied I would be doing that next week. Mrs. Potter stated that I don't know what you can do; the spots are here and there. I just hate for them to. get so bad. Fknow that Mr. Bontemps once said to me that the south looks like the north looked -two years ago.- We are behind the north, but I sure don't want to catch up. I just appeal to you to try to halt the deterioration. Mr..Werner asked if Mr; Lewis in the last year didn't dig some flushing channels in the south? Mrs. Potter replied there were some channels dug and I check them on my morning walk. They are flowing, but it doesn't seem to have attacked the basic problem. I am also noticing how many bare branches there-are.... I don't see that wonderful curtain of green that I used to see. All I see now are bare branches. You can look completely through the mangroves. Mr. Werner stated we might have to go with Mr. Domenie's suggestion to raise the elevation six feet and plant some palm trees. ADJOURN There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 4:55 PM. David Roellig, Chairman 31 w 0 g mi wI ifl m Lu LL m' w, N'. O' Cl2I ml w 2 m� Iwl OIL Z �ml w I 1 ml LU m ..... �w o_ w c 2 m' w�QBQ m w 0 m i m wi is ss 888888 888. 8. 8. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 E k 2 2 a CP z ¢3r2 a 3� c cii L31 LL w Im O !. 1 !w im 10 I� i'� m I.� I! m I(OV I;; :,NN $ 8 8 8 x x � z r r g E C s I a tt ui w w E E 2 N E w a a E U tLLy aN0 o� co ca W CD o� W o� g z m LU o� - m W � m Q W �Im i W OIL 7' m w m w old Q,m w o� �i M. w old 0 CO LL , W i ro m LU I T t C � a a C m � m y ' n `` O QQ fn o a N 0 a d d c 0 C°- �' 0 a s °' ` E ro m p _ w u U a > y E `2 a c a c a3i CC v -0 `1 � a S E� � � a�i N c E in in ¢ o¢ o a Un w o a: vi o¢ CO o �, ° 3 d Z ,. = m N C O H � p NN r I.. N. CO V tp I- 00 W .- r .�- .�- T i- N N 1�I. N N N N N N m N � cl I lo, fYq N W W [ 1 ro E E 21 in E 3 S cn a c ro CL N N N Q A? a g Y «. F- cn 0 w �o O C �U O LL O 45 ao I-I1. 3 M tSTON I NGIN'I-Ef. r. NO NFr-,LN6 P1`0,lj grlr. PkRA MJIJ,, August 3, 2000 Mi. Kyle Lukasz Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 60S Naples, FL 34.108 16J1 1 066 � ,vRPOM Pend N. SL xzr 14 rvWLFS FLV!1� X4109 FAX 94 [ ; 94 ; O.% 13HONF 941 594 2a71 SENT VIA FAX 597 -5400, 3 pages Re: Seagate Culvert Flow Study, H &M File No. 9068 Dear Kyle. We have completed the study of tidal flow through the Seagate Road culverts, comparing the pre -Ciam Bay Restoration dredging condition to the post dredging condition. Please note that this study is based on comparing data collected in 1996 by Dave Tackney to the data which you collected in January 2000. Attached Figure 1 ,shows the correlation between head difference across the culverts to the average culvert flow velocity, and Figure 2 shows the change in volumetric flow. Although there is some scatter in the data, it is evident that the velocity to head difference ratio is much lower for the January 2000 data than for the 1996 data. The main differences between conditions at the time of data collection is that the dredging of the inlet and bay channels and installation of the flap gates on the culverts were completed between the two times of data collection. The dredging contributed significantly to the reduced head difference because it increased the tine range and reduced the tidal phase lag in Clam Bay. This would of course reduce the flow velocity. However, the reduction in flow velocity is much greater than would occur from the reduction in head difference alone. It therefore seerns apparent that the flap gate presents a significant restriction to flow. Figure 1 illustrates that, assuming the data collection procedures, atmospheric conditions, and tidal conditions were similar, under present conditions the flow is only about 10% of what it would be without the flap gate in place. The volume of tlOW results are presented on the chart in Figure 2. The results are presented for flood tidni flow only, because the post dredging condition flow rates were measurers after the flap -gates were installed on the culverts and the flap gates only allow flow freim south to north. 16J1 Figure 2 illustrates that the flow volume has been reduced by approximately 90 %. The dredging was expected to reduce the flow significantly because it increased the Clam Bay tide range and reduced the phase lag. This means that the tide range and phase tag for Clam Bay are now much closer to the tide range and phase lag in Venetian Bay. The head difference across the culverts is therefor much smaller than prior to the dredging, and the smaller head difference results in much lower flow velocities and volumes. However, as discussed above, it appears as if the flap gates offer flow resistance which has contributed significantly to the lower flow volumes. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS i Kenneth K. Fllurniston, f'.B Attachment "I'M I'; 1;1N & U0Or(L It Nl; I ?Jf 6171 • NA 1'1.1) x10171 D 16J1 SEAOATre CULVERT FLOW VELOCITY DATA l ! � 1 p 3.4 - 2.5 `. _._ _ ..__..., . _ .. _. _- --....__._...._.___..:..._ .. - ._ f -A-. -) .__. IUN tBBG .._ .._. ___ I _....... ('fA('K1YEY DATA) I 2 1 j • JAN 2000 tC01J.ICR ( •,, COUNTY LIATA) t6 . 1 fly �• — --- -.__. ;_. __ __. ._.__-- -- -•--_. _ ! sense 0 2 4 b tt 10 12 14 16 1b GRAD MFFMMTIAL JW-HV" Flu.. • CHANGE IN SEAGATE CULVERT FLOOD TIOAL.FLOW VOLUME REEULTWO FROM ONE WAY VALVE WSTALLATION ow w 4W) a000 _ . _.. j t}ACKNeY uara) ■P0!3TC0N9TR Ti 2000 Ic (GOLLiER COLMY DATA) low WEST MrppLf CAST CULVIMT. LaCATIOM Fiavro 2 ub /UJ /UU 111U UJ:Utt rAA .79140004.74 PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 INSTALLATION 16J1 A Valve shall be installed in accordance with manufacturer's written Installation and Operation Manual and approved submittals. 3.02 MANUFACTURER'S CUSTOMER SERVICE A. Manufacturer's authorized representative shall be available for customer service during installation and start-up, and to train personnel in the operation, maintenance and troubleshooting of the valve. B. Manufacturer shall also make customer service available directly from the factory in addition to authorized representatives for assistance during installation and start-up, and to train personnel in the operation, maintenance and troubleshooting of the valve. 3/17199 -59102 Vr 011- MMICINTOS rummC7Yw M103-011-0091®84-231 IS 0$/03/00 THU 03:08 FAA U41Zb3b4U4 RILJWVfilLLLtt—L'11Uii�i:ui�a,w �,___ SERIES TF -1 SLIP -ON CHECK VALVE4 6J 1 Specification #RV -TF -1 CLAM BAY OUTFALL CE: WILSON MILLER PART 1 GENERAL 1.01 SUBMITTALS A. Submit product literature that includes information on the performance and operation of the valve, materials of construction, dimensions and weights, elastomer characteristics, flow data, headloss data, and pressure ratings. B. Upon request, provide shop drawings that clearly identify the valve dimensions. 1.02 QUALITY ASSURANCE A Supplier shall have at least ten (10) years experience in the manufacture of "duckbill' style elastomeric valves, and shall provide references and a list of Installations upon request. PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.01 'DUCKBILL" ELASTOMERIC CHECK VALVES A Diffuser Check Valves are to be all rubber of the flow operated check type with a slip -on connection. The Check Valve is designed to slip over the specified pipe outside diameter and attached by means of vendor furnished stainless steel clamps. The port area shall contour down to a duckbill, which shall allow passage of flow in one direction while preventing reverse flow. The valve shall be one piece Neoprene rubber construction, EPDM exterior for UV and Ozone protection, and nylon reinforcement. The duckbill shall be offset so that the bottom line of the valve is flat, keeping the invert of the pipe parallel with the invert of the valve. The top of the valve shall rise to form the duckbill shape. The bill portion shall be thinner and more flexible than the valve body, and formed into a curve of 1800. Anti- foul paint to be supplied by the manufacture and field applied by the contractor. B. Manufacturer must have available flow test data from an accredited hydraulics laboratory to confirm pressure drop data. Company name, plant location, valve size and serial number shall be bonded to the check valve. Valves shall be manufactured in the USA. 2.02 FUNCTION A When line pressure inside the valve exceeds the backpressure outside the valve by a certain amount, the line pressure forces the bills of the valve open, allowing flow to pass. When backpressure exceeds the line pressure by at the same amount, the bills of the valve are forced closed. The flat bottom allows the valve to be installed where minimal bottom clearance exists. 2.03 MANUFACTURER A. All valves shall be of the Series TF -1 as manufactured by the Red Valve Co., Inc. of Carnegie, PA 15106 or approved equal. VnI99 59102 Var. 011- AMCIlMS nA&ALC�w M10S-001.0094M S -221IS I a fa r. Im4a�a'� 0. x Ci � 944 1 i g I a N"{ wi i°o r a o s 2 i I 1 c t a 3:1NtlW3l'J 1 annipt h ` 1 1l I ♦ � .19'96 Wi Eff.w 1199,151 0 � U o a is j 5 ? g "W LE Vloo LD m_ v � W H � Z � J 0. `IA atom V3 ca ZE o �Z 3 C9 ,r x N W f�py sQ sC3 ♦ x — ♦ co Z .Q I cL. o Q r- U e[ W CL- J �s .Q C7 � Z c © V. is HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS Ili I COASTAL ENGINEERING OESIC,N ANO PERMITTING January 17, 2001 MEMORANDUM 16J1 S679 STRAND COURT. uNR i I o WPUS. FLORIDA 341 10 FAX 941 594 ZOZ5 PHONE. 041 M loll Sent via Facslmlle To: Kyle Lukasz, Todd Turrell From: Ken Humiston Re: Seagate Culvert Flow Measurements, H&M Fite No. 9478 The minutes of the December 6, 2000 Board meeting indicate that there was apparently some difficulty In interpreting our August 3, 2000 memo. That memo states that northward flow velocities through the Seagate Drive Culverts have been reduced by approximately 90% as the result of dredging and installation of flow valves at the culverts. Although improvements to the hydraulic efficiency of Clam Pass increased the tidal range in Clam Bay which would reduce flow from Venetian Bay into Clam Bay, it appears as if resistance to flow offered by the flow valves Is responsible for most of this flow reduction. Since the time of the data collection discussed in that memo, we have analyzed data you provided to us from your follow -up measurement of flow through the culverts during December 2000. The December 2000 data has been included in attached Figures 1 and 2, which are updated figures from our August 3, 2000 memo. This information confirms the conclusion presented in the August memo. Figure 1 shows flow velocity through the culverts as a function of head difference. Data is presented from both before dredging and flow valve installation, and after. This data shows that flow velocities were considerably higher prior to the dredging and flow valve installation. Although the dredging improved tidal exchange in Clam Bay, which reduced the average head difference across the culverts, the post dredging velocities in Figure 1 are disproportionately lower regardless of head difference. This confirms the conclusion stated in our earlier memo, that in addition to stopping flow in the southward direction from Clam Bay into Venetian Bay on ebb tide, the one -way flow valves are significantly restricting flow to the north on flood tide. 16J1 ; F n G (ON003S t L33d) ut0013A o Q o Z Q QW Z 4 O O WOO I. 77- 4 44 to N I � i l V ( uj ! I � V 4 � 1.• i i i i I m Z z 1 i j W ul w N i ; F n G (ON003S t L33d) ut0013A W J O Z HO H 05 J J LL. d dy p Z P W C J OQ 7 U. Q LL �i W W J Z �O V � Q� 00 Q Z N J Z M IiJ � Z c Q S U § $ ° N !' iw 1 SNOT" Z O P uj4 o Q J J V W 3 N a gCM o . z Q Lu D 0� �� �� 00 i,D� o mo! a:p U) U NU ZW OUJ J J Ow U- i W � N o aU O U gV IL • 0 ti § $ ° N !' iw 1 SNOT" Z O P uj4 o Q J J V W 3 N a 16J1 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE MEETING SUMMARY MINUTES — AUGUST 9, 2001 Naples, Florida Mr. James Carroll, Chairman Mr. Joseph Bawduniak Mr. Glen Harrell (Absent) Mr. Christopher Sutphin ALSO PRESENT: Approximately five (5) members of the public; Mr. James P. Ward, Department Director, Pelican Bay Services Division; and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. Mr. Vlasho, Chairman of the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee spoke to the Sub- committee requesting that they refrain from making any motions or taking any action on certain items until the Brock Report comes out to see what it contains. Several members have spoken to Mr. Brock about his report and most feel quite comfortable with the direction that Mr. Brock is taking. After much discussion the Sub - committee agreed that Summary and verbatim Minutes would be prepared for the Sub - committee Meetings. It was determined that the Advisory Committee needs to become more proactive rather than reactive when issues come before the Committee. The Committee needs to look at itself internally and reflect on evaluating itself, its relationships and what it has done as an organization or a Committee. The group consensus was that once we have a specific agenda, and that probably won't happen until after the Brock Report has been published, read and digested, if it was in conformance with policy and regulations, it might make more sense to have more frequent but shorter and more focused meetings on the specific issue and invite the public that might be interested in one issue, but not an entire agenda. Keep the meetings short and more focused. It was determined after a lengthy conversation that any and all correspondence coming into a Committee or Sub - committee member is a public document and deserves to be answered or referred to Mr. Ward for a reply in timely manner. The Sub - committee determined that it would not be appropriate to ask a member of the Foundation Board to sit at the table of the Advisory Committee because you have to be equal in how you disperse that policy across your residential base. It would open the door to any 1 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE 16JI SUMMARY MINUTES August 9, 2001 organization within Pelican Bay asking to have a representative sit at the Committee table. You can't discriminate in the public sector against one group over another because of a status that you perceive they have or do not have. You have to be equal in the treatment of all. There was a lengthy discussion regarding the Sunshine Laws and Mr. Carroll's feeling that we are less effective in the way we do business as a result of the laws and not being able to communicate with each other outside of a public meeting. The Sub - committee determined that regular articles in the Pelican Bay Post should continue to keep people informed of what we are doing. They should be made aware that certain items are under preliminary consideration and in no way final and will have to come before the entire Advisory Committee for discussion. The Sub - committee agreed that discussion on the following items would be postponed until after the Brock Report has been released: Evaluation of the Brock Report Review of Manager's Job Description and Scope of Services Manager Performance Review Request for Bids on Manager Position It was determined that the Sub - committee would_ continue to discuss the issue of a reduction in the size of the MSTBU Advisory Committee. There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 4:30 P.M. 2 16J1 CLERK OF COURTS DRAFT REPORT ON PELICAN BAY MSTBU ISSUES At the request of County Commission Chairman Jim Carter, Clerk of Courts Dwight Brock became involved in the issues surrounding the direction of the Pelican Bay MSTBU. It was, and is, the Clerk's intention to "listen to the residents of the community in order to discover if there is any common ground among the citizens of Pelican Bay." In order to accomplish that goal, Mr. Brock met numerous times with groups and individuals of the Pelican Bay community, received phone calls, messages and letters from residents, and held four open community forums on April 9" and 10h and 16`h and 17" , 2001, at which the citizens of Pelican Bay were encouraged to share their perceptions and ask questions. The outcome of these many and varied contacts produced several areas of general agreement. These have been listed in a section below. Available at the Clerk's office are letters received by the Clerk related to these matters. These letters are reviewable at your pleasure during normal business hours. The various Ordinances related to the MSTBU and the Minutes of the Board of County Commissioners meetings at which the Pelican Bay MSTBU was discussed can be found at other locations within the Clerk of Courts website at �� \\ �\ .cicrk.colher.11.us. The following areas of consensus were found as a result of meetings with numerous individuals and groups within the Pelican Bay Community. • That the MSTBU form of governance is the form preferred by the citizens of Pelican Bay. • That the MSTBU Advisory Board exercise as much control as possible subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. • That members appointed to the MSTBU Advisory Board should be selected by the stakeholders in the process (Stakeholders being property owners.) • That both the residential interests and the commercial interests within Pelican Bay should be represented on the Advisory Board (The Board consisting of 11 members; 9 representing residents and 2 representing commercial interests.) • That residents would select only residential representatives and commercial interests would select only commercial representative. • That the Pelican Bay MSTBU manager should be responsible to the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Board to the maximum extent allowed by the MSTBU statutory structure. • That the process for selecting members of the MSTBU Advisory Board occur during the period ol' time when a majority of the residents of Pelican Bay are in Naples. • That any changes to the current MSTBU Advisory Board take place through a transition Process. As a result of' this process there are copies of a draft Ordinance and preliminary draft Letter of A''reenient for everyone's review. It has been a pleasure for us to work with the people of Pelican Bay. We hope that our efforts are m some way helpful. We anticipate continuing our efforts to refine the product. Please keep in mind that this process has not concluded, but rather has only moved into a different stage. More than ever, your input is now needed so that the final product is something that ��orks for the community. A time line of further activity will be developed as circumstances permit. 1 look forward to your comments which can be sent to dwight .brook @clerk.collier.fl.us. 16J1 ORDINANCE NO. 09/10/01 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 90 -111 AS AMENDED; REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -22; REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 98 -113; REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 99 -98; REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2000 -22; REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2000 -82, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2001 -19; IN THEIR ENTIRETY; CREATING THE PELICAN BAY MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING AND BENEFIT UNIT; SETTING FORTH THE BOUNDARIES OF THE UNIT; DESIGNATING THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE UNIT; PROVIDING FOR PURPOSE AND POWERS; PROVIDING FOR ANNUAL ESTIMATES OF EXPENSES, TAXATION AND ASSESSMENT RATE; PROVIDING FOR TAX AND ASSESSMENT IMPOSITION AND COLLECTION; PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION OF THE PELICAN BAY MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING AND BENEFIT UNIT ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR COMPOSITION, NOMINATION AND APPOINTMENT; PROVIDING FOR TERMS OF OFFICE; PROVIDING FOR REMOVAL FROM OFFICE, FAILURE TO ATTEND MEETINGS; PROVIDING FOR OFFICERS, QUORUM, RULES OF PROCEDURE; PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES; PROVIDING FOR FUNCTIONS, POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR THE DUTIES OF THE COUNTY MANAGER; PROVIDING FOR A REVIEW PROCESS; PROVIDING FOR OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT PRIOR TO INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF USE OF TAXING OR ASSESSING AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR SUPERCESSION, REPEAL AND CONSOLIDATION OF PRIOR ORDINANCES RELATING TO STREET LIGHTING; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Creation of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit. Pursuant to Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, and Collier County Ordinance No. 88- 23, the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit (hereinafter "Unit ") is hereby created for the purpose of providing street lighting, water management, Revised 6- 25- 01/7 -31 -01 CADOCU ME- 11SMITH_BI LOCALS- 11TEMPTELICANBAYORDI gANCE.DOC extraordinary law enforcement service and beautification, including but not limited to beautification of recreation facilities, sidewalk, street and median areas, identification markers, the maintenance of conservation or preserve areas and to finance the landscaping beautification of only that portion of U.S. 41 from Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road. While repealing the various ordinances dealing with the Unit, the purpose of this Ordinance is to adopt a new ordinance that consolidates said preexisting ordinances into one easily read and understood ordinance, with some modifications that express the will of the property owners within the Unit. SECTION TWO: Boundaries of the Unit. The Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit is comprised of and includes those lands as described on the attached Exhibit "A" and as depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" SECTION THREE: Governing Body. The governing body of the Unit shall be ex- officio the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. SECTION FOUR: Purpose: Powers. The Unit is formed for the purpose of providing street lighting, water management, extraordinary law enforcement service and beautification, including but not limited to beautification of recreation facilities, sidewalk, street and median areas, identification markers, the maintenance of conservation or preserve areas and to finance the landscaping beautification of only that portion of U.S. 41 from Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road in the above - described taxing and benefit unit and to Revised 6- 25- 01,7 -31 -01 CADOCUME -1 \SMITH_B \LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANBAYORDIt4NCE.DOC 16J1 that end shall possess all the powers to do all things reasonably necessary to provide such services. SECTION FIVE: Annual Estimates of Expenses; Taxation Rate. For the purpose of carrying into effect and the administration of this Ordinance, the Board of County Commissioners shall annually, at the time required by general budgetary law, review and adopt an itemized estimate of the amount of money required to carry out the business of the Unit for the next fiscal year, which shall be from October 1 to and including September 30 following (the "Budget "). The proposed Budget shall be prepared in consultation with and reviewed by the Advisory Committee (the "Committee ") prior to its consideration by the Board of County Commissioners and after review by the Committee shall be heard, considered and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners as provided for herein. The proposed Budget shall describe the purpose or purposes for which the moneys are required and the amount necessary to be raised by taxation and assessment within the Unit. At the time and place for establishing the annual rate of taxation for County purposes, the Board shall fix and cause to be levied on all property within the Unit subject to taxation or assessment a millage and assessment sufficient to meet the requirements of the Budget; provided, however, the total millage shall not exceed the millage authorized by law for municipal service taxing and benefit units. SECTION SIX: Tax Assessment, Imposition and Collection. Taxes and assessments herein provided for shall be assessed, imposed and collected in the same manner and form as provided for the assessment and collection Revised 6- 25- 01/7 -31 -01 CADOCUME- 1\SMITH_B \LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANBAYORDIr�kNCE.DOC 16J1 of general County taxes subject to the same fees for assessing and collecting as general County taxes in accordance with general law. SECTION SEVEN: Creation of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit Advisory Committee. Concurrent with the passage of the Ordinance, an eleven (11) member advisory committee to be known as the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit Advisory Committee (hereinafter "Committee ") is hereby created. Those individuals who are members of the Committee as of the moment prior to the effective date of this Ordinance, shall continue on as members of the Committee until the natural expiration of their term as set forth in the prior ordinances. SECTION EIGHT: Composition, Nomination and Appointment A) The Committee shall be representative of the residential, business and commercial interests and landowners in Pelican Bay. To that end, nine (9) of the Committee members shall be representative of the residential interests within the Unit and two (2) of the Committee members shall be representative of the commercial and business interests within the Unit. Members of the Committee shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board of County Commissioners pursuant to the procedure outlined herein. The nine (9) Committee members representative of the residential interests within the Unit shall be permanent residents of and qualified electors within the Unit. The two (2) Committee members representative of the commercial and business interests shall be permanent residents of and qualified electors in Collier County. Appointment of members to the Committee shall be by resolution of the Board of Revised 6- 25- 018 -31 -01 CADOCUME -1 \SMITH_B\ LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANBAYORDRgANCE.DOC 16J1 County Commissioners, which resolution shall set forth the date of appointment and the term of office. Any member of the Committee who ceases to meet the requisite qualifications during his or her term of office shall immediately advise the Board of County Commissioners in writing of such change in status. Upon the Board of County Commissioners receiving such notice, otherwise becoming aware of such vacancy, or if a vacancy occurs by any other process, the Board of County Commissioners shall declare the position to be vacant and shall promptly consider filling the vacant position with a person meeting the requisite qualifications as outlined herein: i) who continues to desire to be appointed and ii) who, in the immediately preceding recommendatory balloting received the greatest number of votes among the unsuccessful candidates vying for the position (i.e. "Residential interest" or "Commercial and Business interest ") which has become vacant. B) The terms and provisions of Section Six of Collier County Ordinance No. 86 -41, as amended, titled "PROCESS OF APPOINTMENT" shall not be applicable to appointment of members to the Unit. C) On and after March 1, 2002 and thereafter, all of the members of the Committee shall be appointed by, and all vacancies shall be filled by, the Board of County Commissioners, in the manner outlined herein, beginning with appointment to the Committee of members to fill expiring memberships . All appointments of members to the Committee shall be at the sole and complete discretion of the Board of County Commissioners. Provided however, that the Board of Revised 6- 25- 01/7 -31 -01 CADOCUME- 1 \SMITH_B \LOCALS- 1 \TEMPTELICANBAYORDIN�NCE.DOC 16J1 County Commissioners will take into consideration and give great weight to the recommendations of the property owners within the Unit, utilizing the process outlined herein. Beginning with the second Tuesday in December, 2001, and each second Tuesday in December thereafter, the Board of County Commissioners shall publicly announce and advertise all upcoming vacancy(ies) on the Committee and shall request that applications be submitted or nominations made to the Board of County Commissioners to fill the expiring term(s). All such applications or nominations shall be submitted in writing to the Board of County Commissioners no later than 28 days after said announcement as determined by the postmark on mailed applications /nominations and the time stamp on hand delivered applications /nominations. The name(s) of all appropriately qualified individuals timely submitted to the Board of County Commissioners shall be considered nominees for appointment to fill said expiring term(s). The Board of County Commissioners shall then publish said list of nominees and the positions on the Committee for which they have been nominated (i.e., for the "residential interests" or for the "commercial and business interests ") and deliver a conformed copy thereof to the Clerk of Courts (the "Clerk "). D) The Clerk shall cause the name of each nominee as reported and published by the Board of County Commissioners to be included on the mail ballot, which ballot shall be mailed to all of the non - governmental property owners of the class (i.e." Residential or Commercial /Business) corresponding with the class for which the balloting is occuring ( "Residential or Commerical /Business ") within the Unit no less than thirty (30) days prior to the balloting date. Said balloting date being set by the Board of Revised 6- 25- 01/7 -31 -01 CADOCUME -1 \SMITH_B \LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANBAYORDI(6ANCE.DOC 16J1 County Commissioners. E) i. One (1) indivisible vote may be cast for each parcel in the Unit regardless of the number of persons who have an ownership interest in the property or the manner in which title is held by them, with each discrete parcel being those as listed by the Property Appraiser of Collier County and as approved by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. Commercial or Business owners cast ballots only for "Commercial and Business interest" positions and Residential owners cast ballots only for "Residential interest" positions. Only one property owner shall have the right to cast a ballot for each parcel. If the property is owned jointly by two or more natural persons, all of the record owners must sign the ballot. If two or more owners do not agree among themselves how to cast the ballot, that ballot shall not be counted for any purpose. If the owner is not a natural person, the owner thereof shall have the responsibility and obligation to designate in writing one (1) natural person who is authorized to cast the ballot. The written designation shall accompany the ballot and shall be filed with the Clerk. Failure to file the written designation shall result in the ballot being disregarded. ii. For purposes of determining record title owners of property entitled to cast ballots, the listed record title owners of property as evidenced by the Collier County Property Appraiser's tax rolls as of sixty (60) days prior to the balloting date shall be utilized and deemed conclusive. Not less than forty -five (45) days prior to the balloting date, the Property Appraiser shall provide the Clerk and the Board of County Commissioners with the list of all parcels within Revised 6- 25- 0117 -31 -01 C:\DOCUME -1 \SMITH_S \LOCALS -1 \TEMP\PELICANBAYORDIrrNCE.DOC 1r, IM the Unit, each parcel's identification number, the names of the property owners and their addresses, with said list designating each parcel as either residential or commercial (based upon the Property Appraiser's classification system). iii. The mail ballots shall be cast directly with the Clerk. At the place and time stated in the notice of the balloting published by the Board of County Commissioners, the Clerk, with the assistance of the County Attorney's Office, shall open and count the ballots, which have been returned to the Clerk as of the date and time stated in such notice of balloting, in a manner which the Clerk deems advisable and not inconsistent with the positions of this ordinance. Any member of the public shall be entitled to attend and observe. The determination of the Clerk and the County Attorney of validity of any ballot shall be final. iv. The nominee(s) receiving a plurality of the ballots cast in each category of membership shall be deemed the successful nominee(s) and their name(s) shall be reported and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners shall then, at their next regularly scheduled meeting, make the necessary appointments to fill said positions. F. The cost of the nomination and balloting process shall be borne by the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION NINE: Terms of Office. In 2002, of the four (4) terms which are expiring: i) two (2) positions shall be filled with persons representative of the residential interests who shall each be Revised 6- 25- 0117 -31 -01 CADOCUME- 1 \SMITH_B\ LOCALS- 1 \TEMP\PELICANBAYORDITNCE.DOC 16J1 appointed for a four (4) year term; and ii) two (2) positions shall be filled with persons representative of the commercial and business interests, wherein one (1) person will be appointed for a four (4) year term and one (1) person appointed for a two (2) year term. Thereafter, each appointment or reappointment shall be for a term of four (4) years. A member of the Committee may be reappointed by the Board of County Commissioners for one (1) successive term, if there are no other qualified applicants for the member's position. Appointments to fill any vacancies on the Committee shall be for the remainder of the unexpired term of office. SECTION TEN: Removal From Office; Failure to Attend Meetings. A) Any member of the Committee may be removed from office by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners. B) Notwithstanding the provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 86 -41 as to attendance, if any member of the Committee fails to attend two (2) consecutive Committee meetings without a satisfactory excuse, as determined by the committee, or if a member is absent from more than one -half of the Committee's meetings in a given fiscal year, the Committee shall declare the member's seat to be vacant and the vacancy shall be filled by the Board of County Commissioners in conformance with this ordinance. SECTION ELEVEN: Officers; Quorum; Rules of Procedure. A) At its earliest opportunity, the membership of the Committee shall elect a chairman and vice chairman from among the members one (1) year, with eligibility for re- election. Revised 6- 25- 01/7 -31 -01 CADOCUME- 1 \SMITH_B \LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANBAYORDIN*NCE.DOC Officers' terms shall be for Lrflwi C) The presence of six (6) or more members shall constitute a quorum of the Committee necessary to take action and transact business. In addition, an affirmative vote of a majority of the members present shall be necessary in order to take action, except that an affirmative vote of seven (7) or more members present shall be required to adopt the Budget for the Unit. D) The Committee shall, by majority vote of the entire membership, adopt rules of procedure for the transaction of business and shall keep a detailed record of meetings, resolutions, findings and determinations. SECTION TWELVE: Reimbursement of Expenses. Members of the Committee shall serve without compensation, but shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of their duties upon prior approval of the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION THIRTEEN: Functions Powers and Duties of the Committee. The functions, powers and duties of the Committee shall be as follows, and shall be carried out consistent with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding/ Letter of Understanding referenced herein: A) With the assistance of the County Manager, provide input to the Board of County Commissioners in carrying out the purposes of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit as set forth in this Ordinance. B) Upon any decision by the Board of County Commissioners to dissolve, merge or otherwise change or discontinue the functions or services provided by the Pelican Bay Improvement District, the Committee shall be prepared to and shall aid, Revised 6- 25- 01/7 -31 -01 CADOCUME- 1 \SMITH_B \LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANBAYORDIttNCE.DOC 16J1 assist and provide input to the County Manager and the Board of County Commissioners, within the time frame requested, in effectuating a smooth and expeditious transfer of street lighting, water management and beautification services, responsibilities and obligations to the Unit. C) With the assistance of the County Manager, to prepare and recommend to the Board of County Commissioners an itemized Budget of the amount of money required to carry out the business of the Unit for the next fiscal year. D) The Committee shall recommend work programs and priorities to the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with the adopted Budget or Budget amendments which may be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in accordance with law. The execution of work programs shall be under the direct supervision and responsibility of the County Manager with the assistance of the Committee and County staff in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding /Letter of Understanding. Said work may be performed under contract (in accordance with law and County policy) or by County forces. E) To enter into a Memorandum of Understanding /Letter of Understanding with the Board of County Commissioners, and with the County Manager, wherein the parties outline that the intent in the operation of the Unit is to allow the Committee to exercise decision and control of the day to day operational affairs of the Unit to the maximum extent allowed by law, unless and except when there is some overriding governmental reason to do otherwise. SECTION FOURTEEN: Duties of the County Manager. Revised 6- 25- 0117 -31 -01 C:\DOCUME- 1 \SMITH_B\ LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANSAYORDIVfNCE.DOC 16J1 The duties of the County Manager or his designee shall be: A) To administer the activities of the Unit in accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding /Letter of Understanding, and the established policies of the Board of County Commissioners, subject to the terms of this Ordinance. B) To assist the Committee performing its functions as defined by this Ordinance including the preparation of the proposed annual Budget. C) Provide periodic written reports to the Committee and the Board of County Commissioners on the activities of the Unit and its finances. D) To require any contract manager or employee manager of the Unit to report directly to the County Manager. SECTION FIFTEEN: Review Process. This Ordinance shall be reviewed once every four (4) years commencing in 2003, in accordance with the procedures contained in Collier County Ordinance No. 86- 41, as amended. SECTION SIXTEEN: Opportunity to Comment Prior to Initial Implementation or Use of the Unit's Taxing and Assessment Authority. Prior to adopting the Budget for the Unit and implementing any taxing or assessment authority under this Unit, the Board of County Commissioners shall hold a public hearing upon reasonable notice in a local newspaper of general circulation. At such public hearing the Board of County Commissioners will consider the Budget prepared by the Advisory Committee and provide the public in general the opportunity to comment on the Budget and the implementation or use of the Unit's taxing and Revised 6 -25 -01/7 -31.01 CADOCUME- 1 \SMITH_B \LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANBAYORDItJ�NC E.DOC 16J1 assessment authority. SECTION SEVENTEEN: Supercession, Repeal and Consolidation of Prior Ordinances. A) Collier County Ordinances No. 91 -22, 98 -113, 99 -98, 2000 -82, and 2001 -19 are hereby repealed in their entirety. B) Collier County Ordinances No. 78 -67, 80 -53, 82 -122, 85 -9, 86 -29, and 88 -35 are hereby superceded and repealed to the extent same are either inconsistent or not harmonious with this Ordinance and consolidated with the Unit for the purposes of providing street lighting. SECTION EIGHTEEN: Conflict and Severability. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION NINETEEN: Construction. This Ordinance shall be liberally construed to effectuate its public purpose. SECTION TWENTY: Inclusion in Code of Laws and Ordinances. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be numbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section ", "article ", or any other appropriate word. SECTION TWENTY -ONE: Effective Date, Revised 6- 25- 01/7 -31 -01 CADOCUME -1 \SMITH_B\LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANBAYOR DI "NCE. DOC I M1 This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State of the State of Florida. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 2001. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: , CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David Weigel County Attorney Revised 6- 25- 0117 -31 -01 CADOCU ME- 1 \SMITH_B\LOCALS -1 \TEMP \PELICANBAY0RD1V4NCE.D0C 16J1 Memorandum of Agreement/Letter of Understanding This is a Letter of Understanding/Memorandum of Agreement between the Office of the County Manager and the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit Advisory Committee. In so far as the common good of the residents, businesses and commercial interests located in the community of Pelican Bay can be furthered and advanced by the activities of a municipal service and benefits unit, and that end the most efficient method of operations is to allow the Advisory Committee those powers and duties as may be necessary to achieve the benefits related to those purposes described in Section Four of Ordinance No. 2001 - _, the Office of the County Manager does make this declaration: 1. That the Functions, Powers and Duties of the Committee as listed in Section Thirteen of Ordinance No. 2001 - _ are a full and complete listing of the responsibilities of the Committee. That the County Manager shall accept the direction of the Committee in its exercise of decision and control of the day to day operations relating to the purpose and powers of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit in conformance with Section Thirteen of Ordinance No. 2001 - to the maximum extent allowed by law, unless and except when there is some overriding governmental reason to do otherwise. 3. That all ultimate administrative and ministerial powers, duties, responsibilities, decisions, and control related to the operations of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit are appropriately retained by the Office of the County Manager, in conformance with County Ordinances 93 -72 and 95 -49 (Collier County Administrator Ordinances), under the policy direction of the Board of County Commissioners sitting as the ex officio Board of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit. Entered into this day of , 2002. County Manager Chairman of the Advisory Committee 16J1 Memorandum of Agreement/Letter of Understanding This is a Letter of Understanding/Memorandum of Agreement between the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit Advisory Committee. In so far as the common good of the residents, businesses and commercial interests located in the community of Pelican Bay can be furthered and advanced by the activities of a municipal service and benefits unit, and to that end the most efficient method of operation is to allow the Advisory Committee those powers and duties as may be necessary to achieve the benefits related to those purposes described in Section Four of Ordinance No. 2001 - , the Board of County Commissioners do make this declaration: 1. That the Functions, Powers and Duties of the Committee as listed in Section Thirteen of Ordinance No. 2001- _ are a full and complete listing of the responsibilities of the Committee. 2. That the Board of County Commissioners shall accept the direction of the Committee in.its policy decisions relating to the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit in conformance with Section Thirteen of Ordinance No. 2001 -_ to the maximum extent allowed by law, unless and except when there is some overriding governmental reason to do otherwise. 3. That all ultimate policy making powers of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service, Taxing and Benefit Unit are reserved unto the Collier County Board of County Commissioners sitting as Ex officio Board of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit pursuant to Florida Law. Entered into this day of , 2002. Chairman of the Board of County Chairman of the Advisory Committee Commissioners Fiala ✓ Cam J 1 � Henning Maa'Kie Coietta COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE SUITE 605 NAPLES, FL 34108 (941) 597 -1749 FAX: (941) 597 -4502 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE PELICAN BAY MSTBU ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO BE HELD AT THE FOUNDATION CENTER, 8962 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 at 3:00 P.M. AGENDA Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of the August 9, 2001 Sub - committee Meeting 3. Discussion of Mr. Brock's Report 4. Committee Requests 5. Audience Participation 6. Adjournment ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE DIVISION OFFICE AT (941) 597 -1749 AT LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. misc. Corres: Date: _J aL_1 =� Item# I IQ S k Cokes To: rail ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES - AUGUST 9, 2001 Naples, Florida LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Pelican Bay Organization Review Sub - committee of the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee met in Regular Session on this date, August 9, 2001 at 3:00 P.M. at the Foundation Center, 8269 Hammock Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Mr. James Carroll, Chairman Mr. Glen Harrell (Absent) Mr. Joseph Bawduniak Mr. Christopher Sutphin ALSO PRESENT: Approximately five (5) members of the public; Mr. James P. Ward, Department Director, Pelican Bay Services Division; and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of the July 12, 2001 Sub - committee Meeting 3. Administrative - Number, Timing and Location of Meetings - Detailed Minutes vs. Summary Minutes - Letter, E -Mail, Etc. 4. Preliminary List of Issues to be reviewed 5. Review of Manager's Job Description - Revisit at request of two members - Manager Contract vs. Manager Job Description 6. Initial reaction to Mr. Brock's Report if it is available. 7. New Business 8. Next Meeting 9. Adjournment ROLL CALL Mr. Carroll called the meeting to order and asked that the record show Mr. Glen Harrell with an excused absence. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE JULY 12.2001 SUB - COMMITTEE MEETING Mr. Carroll explained that he has proposed that he have a one -page summary-type set of Minutes. Mr. Ward recommends against this approach pretty strongly and I am going to withdraw from pushing that unless another member on this Sub - committee would want to consider it. Mr. Bawduniak stated that we have certain obligations to have verbatim minutes available at some time, to anybody who objects or wants them. We received two sets of Minutes last time and since I wasn't at the meeting they were very valuable to me. One was the verbatim, which certainly brought me up to speed, but before I read that I read the summary written by Mr. Carroll 43 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 and the summary really captured the nuts and bolts of it so I got up to speed in minutes and not hours. To find out how we got to the elements of the summary I went back and read the verbatim minutes. I think the summary has a significant advantage to the public. They are our customers and the people we work for, albeit for nothing, but if somebody wants to get up on a subject of what happened at a meeting, I think it is human nature to read a page or two real quick, whereas if you hand them twelve or fourteen pages you get less communication through more paper. If it is at all reasonable, I think we ought to consider doing both. With one you have it in the record to really beat it up for the people who have to be and want to be involved and when someone asks what happened at the meeting it is nice to hand them a page or two. I think that to serve the people we are working for, the best and easiest, I would say the summary is very helpful. Mr. Sutphin stated that I agree with the summary, but I was unaware that there was a level of interest in the detailed Minutes until I asked Mrs. Smith if anyone ever asks about them. Apparently there is a lot of interest. Certainly in all of my experience, a summary of what is in the underlying document is extremely useful. Mr. Carroll stated that I wrote the last summary and would be happy to do it. I don't know whether Mrs. Smith could do a one page summary, do you think you could? Mrs. Smith replied yes. Mr. Carroll stated that I am happy to suggest that we go ahead with a set of summary minutes and I agree that a lot of people will just want to read the one page. I think we need to go on and ask if the detailed minutes need to be distributed to all of the Advisory Committee members? Mr. Ward replied we would transmit both the detailed and summary Minutes and they can then choose whichever they desire to read. Mr. Carroll stated that Mr. Sutphin had mentioned that it is a whole lot of work to type forty -three pages of minutes. Mr. Sutphin replied that was before I asked her if anyone ever looked at the Minutes and apparently there are a lot of hits on the website and a level of interest that I was not aware of. 44 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Carroll replied then let's do it that way. If you want me to read them or have any questions, just contact me. I did mine from memory the next day and I found it easy to do. If I had waited a week or so it may not have been so easy. Mr. Ward stated that it would not be hard to do a summary as we do the detailed Minutes. Mr. Sutphin moved, seconded by Mr. Bawduniak and unanimously approved the Minutes of the July 12, 2001 Organization Structure Sub - committee Meeting. Mr. Vlasho — Chairman, Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee - When I appointed this Sub - committee my thinking was that we had to have a Sub - committee that would come in with no preconceived notion, to explore the whole situation on how we as an Advisory Committee handle our responsibilities and determine if any improvements could be made. Coming from the school that doesn't buy if it isn't broke, don't fix it; I subscribe to if you think it is not broke you haven't looked at it, so there are always opportunities for improvement. Mr. Vlasho continued that after the last Advisory Committee Meeting where our Chairman had reported to the entire Committee, I was asked to contact Commissioner Carter and discuss with him how we thought this group could coordinate the activities that were going on by the individual he appointed, Mr. Dwight Brock and see if there was a way we could get on the same page. I did call Commissioner Carter and had quite a lengthy conversation with him, at the conclusion of which he said he would speak to Mr. Brock and get back to me. He got back to me and said that you and Mr. Brock should have a conversation, so we did. We had a long conversation, a good conversation and I had sort of been in the position of saying that this whole discussion is a Pelican Bay issue and is an MSTBU issue and the MSTBU ought to pick up the ball now. I think appointing this Committee did put some other groups at ease and I did not want to use the words "to bed ", but they sort of said okay we agree and let's let this Committee pick it up. That is the first conversation I have had with him and as you know I have stayed out of the discussions on this issue since the Commissioner's voted to rescind the Ordinance that had been approved. I was pleased with what he had to say and at the conclusion I had to say I was impressed with what he was doing and how he was going about it. As he reviewed with me and indicated he would review with anyone who called him, his preliminary findings and I don't know 45 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 where he is in the status of drafting his report, I tried to get a date but he said when it is finished it will be finished and we will get it out. I discussed with him trying to use this Sub - committee as the focal point to either review it, host a meeting that would introduce it to the community and as we talked about it we sort of agreed, he from the very beginning and I had to have a mind change on it and I am not sure that would be good. While I think there are no problems out there now, the old issue is dead, this is an all new effort and I don't know how anyone can be lining up on sides of an issue that hasn't become an issue yet. I do appreciate the situation where people come up with preconceived ideas and they maybe jump off because they think there is an issue. With that said, I am sort of really pleased with where he is going, the things he reviewed with me I am in agreement on. I might not have done it exactly the way he may eventually end up proposing them, but he is on the right track. Mr. Vlasho continued that the reason I asked to be able to address you is that I am going to suggest that you reorient your direction. I would suggest to you that you wait as a Sub- committee to a time when Mr. Brock releases his report, then use that as the basis for your discussions to agree with it, disagree with it, change it, make comments just as others in the community will be doing. Once that whole issue is resolved as to what's going to come out of it and incidentally it appears there are no big changes, which is good because we don't need to be on that discussion again, and once that is done then pick up your other discussions. I am a little concerned if you go out discussing pieces that they might not fit with how the pie is going to be baked and you may create a lot more consternation than you need to. My suggestion is rather than getting into Job Descriptions and who reports to whom and that entire sort of thing, let that evolve. I am comfortable now that Mr. Brock is going to give an unbiased report. He has talked to as many people as would want to talk to him, pros /cons, and I think he has done a good job of beginning to focus those on a couple of issues. As I said, I don't see big changes coming, but I think they will be good changes and perhaps they will allow us to do our job better. Then you could continue your work on whatever has to be done to implement that within the MSTBU Advisory Committee. I wanted to report that to you before you got onto all sorts of discussions. If I had to guess, his report will be out later this month or early September. I think Mr. Bawduniak 46 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 and Mr. Carroll have both spoken to Mr. Brock. In a preliminary way you can give him a call and he is willing to bring you up to date and he is not playing cat and mouse saying when I am ready I will tell you. He tells you where he is today and what he thinks and if you have a comment he listens to that, which may or may not alter his thinking. The conclusion in my mind is that I don't care who solves this issue, but I would like to see it resolved and go away. I don't care who takes credit or gets blamed for it and I think too much effort has gone on by Mr. Brock and I think in a sincere and unbiased way he will come out with something that will be pretty good and not a significant change. Mr. Carroll stated that I had this conversation with Mr. Brock on Friday. I don't know if you got some of the same thoughts, but even though he hasn't published it yet, he gave me some ideas he was going to use. For example, he was going to recommend strongly that the Manager report to the County Manager and that seemed to be a given to him. Of course that is what we wanted anyway and what we voted on. Even beyond that he was talking about some way that he was going to talk to the County Manager about the relationship and that kind of thing. He also seemed to be quite anxious to acknowledge the need for the community to have some kind of a selection process where people in the community had the opportunity to select their members and pass those recommendations on to the Commissioners to appoint. That was something I thought he was pretty clear on. Mr. Vlasho replied he gave me the four major points and how he is going to resolve them, but I didn't think it was my place to publicly talk about them. That is the reason I have couched it. I don't think we want to preempt his report, but on the other hand I think it is gelling and I think the four points will be in it and from what he told me it sounds very good. I was impressed with the work he has done. Mr. Carroll replied I have been also. I really think he has focused on the entire issue in a very positive way and I am delighted that he is involved to the degree that he is. Mr. Vlasho stated that when you gave your report to the Advisory Committee, I expressed a concern that I thought this Sub - committee was moving too fast. You had already gotten to issues and votes and some dissention, which is good, but I am saying wait a minute. If you are 47 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 going to have those discussions you ought to have them within the framework of whatever modifications would be made and then pick up and talk about Job Descriptions and anything else that you can find that would help us to do a better job. I may not have said that initially when I appointed this Sub - committee, but that is really the tone of what I wanted. At the last meeting I reminded you that we ought to look at ourselves and what we do and how we do it. When you point a finger and say this person or that person ought to be doing things differently, the thumb is always pointing back at you. I think I came to the conclusion after I read your Minutes that we really haven't looked at how we could do a better job. Those are my thoughts, I am not here to re- charter the scope of this Sub - committee, but I strongly suggest that you do that. Mr. Carroll stated that in light of what Mr. Vlasho said and to continue my thinking, based on what I heard from Mr. Brock, is that I do question whether we should be delving into a couple of these issues right now prior to his report coming out. I am wondering how the other members feel? Mr. Bawduniak stated that I had a little advantage. I missed our first meeting and then I heard comments about it at the General Meeting so I was able to read the Minutes and then get a little further advice that you and your associates did not have. One of the initial things we are going to deal with is Mr. Ward. He is a consultant. It has been my experience that when you are dealing with consultants, one of the first things you want to do and what Mr. Vlasho just alluded to, is let's take a look at ourselves. We have an organizational structure and we are not going to change that today. A good organizational structure involves interrelating functions. I think we ought to take a look at our role, specifically because we have a hand full of people who range from, and I don't mean this in a hierarchy, but they range on a spectrum from someone who manages a group of retail stores to people have been corporate officers. I don't think anybody on our Committee today has had extensive municipal experience or consulting or managing governmental instrumentalities, so we have a little homework to do ourselves to see how we can work better with Mr. Ward and he work better with us. Mr. Ward is a consummate professional with tremendous experience. That is great, but it is also a problem because he is used to doing so many things automatically. Sometimes we don't hear about the general things he does and M. ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 when we do we say we don't know about that. Well, sometimes it is important, but most of the time it isn't. We have to set up a structure for ourselves on how we conduct ourselves in dealing with him. One of the things I am concerned about is sidewalks among others. I know we have talked about it over many months, but yet I don't recall us coming out of one of meeting, and this is just an example, saying we are really worried about it and sidewalks over three years is not a practical timetable for us to live with. Mr. Ward, order of the day, management by objectives, will you please consider it, we will do follow up and control and what do you need from us if there are issues beyond you and we didn't do that. We found out that it was going to take three years and I am going back through the Minutes trying to figure out when I first heard about this. We hear a lot at these meetings and we each have our own pet interests and things that don't interest us much. I had to go back months and months to find out when we had a commentary and Mr. Ward had done some communicating and ferreting out information from the County and came back to us and said that it is going to take three years. That day I did not jump up and say hey wait a minute; I just wrote myself a note. I think we have to take a look at our priorities and dealing with Mr. Ward in a way that we can somehow make it easier for him to know what to communicate to us, because clearly he does some things that are real interesting and they are d6j& vu with him and he just rolls right alone with his routine and we don't know about it and I don't think there are any dramatic things that happen that scare us. What I am trying to say is that maybe in our discussions, along the way here we can try to evolve a scheme or criteria where we feel more comfortable with what he is doing and maybe we can participate in a non - micro management way with the priorities we think are important for our customers. It is not as simple as communication; it is more understanding. One of the first things I said was that he is an extremely professional guy who has done this job many years, which maybe makes it a little tough for us because he just rolls along and does not appreciate sometimes the fact we have different backgrounds and maybe a different approach or different need for information. We are not him and I don't want to turn him into a report writer because he costs us money. You don't want to pay a consultant to work an hour and report an hour. There has to be some challenge that we come to an equilibrium on to get maximum information out of him with minimum taxation ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 on him and a maximum satisfaction to us that the important things are being done and in a way we think is a priority. Mr. Sutphin stated that I agree with the substance of what you said entirely and this Board, whether it is in Sub - committee or the entire Board, should become more proactive rather than reactive in terms of what we look at. I agree with that. In terms of how Mr. Ward fits into this whole scheme, I have a couple of naive questions that I would like to ask. The County contracts with your firm and not with you. This is hypothetical, but could the firm under the terms of the contract assign anyone of your caliber that they chose to fill that slot or are you specified in the contract as being the person? Mr. Ward replied I am specified in the contract. Mr. Sutphin stated that answers my question. In other words as an example, if we were not happy with you, under the terms of the contract could the County say we would prefer another executive to fulfill the contractual responsibilities? Mr. Ward replied yes, you could request that and under the contract my company would have to comply, but it is not unilateral. If I said I was leaving and they brought someone else in and you said you don't like them, they could not leave that other person with you. You have to agree to whomever sits in this seat. Mr. Sutphin stated that in my mind divides it into two separate issues; the real time issue of Mr. Ward doing his job for the Division, keeping the customers happy, how the Board interrelates to that and then the legal aspects of the contractual obligation between the County and your firm for services. Mr. Carroll stated that I am going to build on what Mr. Bawduniak was saying and he used the one example of the sidewalks. If you look at that list and that is the list I read from the last time and I said we would like to have Mr. Ward be more proactive. When you look back at that, about half of these items I really think go back to the Committee itself rather than to him. If we had taken the initiative when Mr. Ward first came to us and said whoever told us that it was in his budget for three years, we should have said wait a minute that is not good enough. Other items on this list like when Mr. Ward who used to report to the Manager got knocked down three 50 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 notches to the Transportation Department, he brought it up to us, but we did nothing about it. We should have said we don't agree with that. What can he do? He reports to those people and if they tell him he has to report to the Transportation Department there is not much he can do about that, but we can. We can go to Mr. 011iff or Commissioner Carter and say we are not satisfied with that. As I re -read this list and thought about them, I think half of them were issues that we simply did not do what we could have done and I think this was tying in a little with what Mr. Vlasho was alluding to of what we should be doing as a Committee. I am not entirely sure that everybody on the Committee agrees to the idea that we be more proactive. I think if Mr. Harrell were here he could state his position on that and there may be others on the full Committee who don't feel that we should be that aggressive. Mr. Bawduniak stated that proactive is a very generic term. It can range from us calling Mr. Ward everyday as to what you are doing and here is what we want you to do, which is absolutely absurd, to perhaps a more sensible ground of us in someway being more attuned to priorities such as what is really wrong or needs fixing. I happened to jump on the bike paths because there has been a barrier at 6608 Ridgewood Drive for many months. I walk by it and sort of look down and don't say much, but the other day I bumped into two people coming the other way and they were reaching for the barriers. I said what are you doing and they said they were getting it out of the way. I thought, something is wrong here. There is an exposure for us liability wise. These people don't like walking around the barrier and they are going to move it. I thought to myself we talked about this months ago and that sort of got me going as an example of something that at the time we could have either had a little more information as an input or ourselves gotten the information of how many problems there are like 6608 Ridgewood Drive, probably not more than ten or twelve, but let's address them in a sensible fashion. Let's jump on them and if it takes the County two or three years and can't do anything about it, we have at least taken the edge off the exposure to our citizens. Mr. Carroll stated that what we may be drifting into now is the working relationship with Mr. Ward and I am wondering if we want to do that at this time or do we want to set that aside in 51 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 light of what Mr. Vlasho is saying and see what Mr. Brock's report says and would that alter how we might approach that relationship? Mr. Sutphin stated that I think in terms of this Committee making recommendations for policy changes, reporting relationships or whatever, it would be non - productive at best and counter - productive at worst, to do anything prior to having Mr. Brock's report in front of us and knowing where he is coming from. As Mr. Vlasho said we will have the opportunity to agree or disagree with it. Mr. Bawduniak stated that is a separate issue. What Mr. Carroll was alluding to when he started to speak about us examining ourselves, we are into an arena that is us. It is pretty difficult to be faulted for going back and reflecting on our own conduct and evaluating yourself and your relationship and what you have done as an organization or a Committee and that is what I am proposing. That is a nice starting point because it is a win /win. Mr. Sutphin replied there is no question about it. It is internal and we are examining ourselves. Mr. Bawduniak stated that as we both just admitted, when the bike paths came to me and it was said I don't have a problem with that, well there were problems that happened shortly thereafter and maybe we could have handled that differently so that we might have gotten more attention or the problem areas woud be addressed to reduce our exposure. Initially we have a lot of work just keeping it internally, looking at ourselves and past examples because that is how we are going to learn, but looking over our shoulders and saying well, we went left and should have gone 100 right and we will do better next time. Mr. Carroll asked if you are saying we don't have to wait for Mr. Brock's report to address that issue? Mr. Bawduniak stated that I don't think Mr. Brock's report is going to come out and tell us how to optimize our performance as a function. I heard what is going to be in his report and again, I have a high level of comfort with what is in that report, especially since a lot of other people are going to have a say about it. I don't think he is going to come out and say I think you ought to be doing this and why don't you prioritize that. Why don't you come up with a 52 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16J1 August 9, 2001 mechanism so that if you hear something you go out and investigate it yourselves or have Mr. Ward appoint someone from the existing Services Division to give him a note on it, on how many roots there are, where they are and how bad they are. That is something we have to be able to absorb even though it is detailed, it is some of these issues we have to know about to do an intelligent observation and say this is hotter than we thought and make sure he knows what our concerns are. Mr. Carroll stated that maybe one way to get at this is to look at the preliminary list of issues to be discussed. I think if we focus on these we can maybe say this item we ought to wait on, but this other item has nothing to do with Mr. Brock's report and we should put it higher on our priority list. ADMINISTRATIVE NUMBER, TIMING AND LOCATION OF MEETINGS Mr. Carroll stated that we have only had one meeting and this is the second meeting. This was addressing whether we should meet more often or less often and whether this is the best place to meet. Do we just go along just as we have been doing? Mr. Bawduniak stated that this is a period of the year where people are traveling and out of town a couple of weeks at a time. Possibly the driving force of having a meeting is when everybody can get together and probably not more than every three or four weeks for now. When Mr. Brock's report comes out and it heats up, the time of year is going to be more settled as far as traveling and we will have more issues to address with greater frequency. My feeling is to have another in the next few weeks. Mr. Carroll stated that we ought to try to have all four of us here. We have had two meetings and for various reasons there have only been three of us in attendance. It would be very good if we had four and there would be more balance. Mr. Sutphin stated that once we have a specific agenda, and that probably won't happen until after the Brock Report has been published, read and digested, if it was in conformance with policy and regulations, it might make more sense to have more frequent but shorter and more focused meetings on the specific issue and invite the public that might be interested in one issue, but not an entire agenda. Keep the meetings short and more focused. 53 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Carroll stated that our meetings would be different from the entire Committee because they cover so much in full Committee. Ours' are very much focused. What you are saying is that we could have our next meeting on a certain subject? Mr. Sutphin replied if the subject is the contract with the County for Mr. Ward's services that would be it for that meeting. Mr. Carroll stated that makes sense. DETAILED MINUTES VS SUMMARY MINUTES Mr. Carroll continued that we have already covered the item on summary versus detailed minutes. LETTERS, E -MAIL. ETC. Mr. Carroll stated that he gets letters and you have gotten some. Mr. Ward tells me those are a matter of public record and I just can't toss them in the wastebasket if I don't agree with them. Mr. Ward replied and you don't do that, right? Mr. Carroll stated that he did not plan on reading the letters at this meeting, but I was looking for guidance. These were directed to me, do I need to respond? Should I acknowledge or do nothing about them? Mr. Bawduniak stated that if we get them before hand and they ought to be an agenda item, we put them on the agenda and we have the advantage of speaking to them crisply because we have all done our homework and come in here with our own preconceived opinions, which we are going to share. I just scanned the letter from Mr. Laughlin and unless you want to take the time to read and digest it today, I would ordinarily have said if I got it yesterday it could have been an add on item to cover if appropriate. Mr. Carroll stated that if we go that approach we would get overloaded. Mrs. Smith said that she has a multiple number of hits on E -Mail and do we have to address each and every hit physically, there has to be some criteria for identifying those that would be of interest to the general residents. I guess that is one of our challenges to figure out what to respond to. 54 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Carroll asked does this come up on the Advisory Committee or why does it only come up on this Sub - committee? Mr. Bawduniak asked with the letters that come in and the hits that come in on the website, what is the criterion that suggests we really have to address them versus items, which may be of a very select interest? Mr. Ward replied it is very individualized. You have to look at each letter and what I do is I look at it and if it is a matter that I can respond to and answer that individual's question because I know what the policy of the Advisory Committee or the Sub - committee might be, then I will write that individual a letter and respond to it. If it is a matter that the Committee has taken up and they have chosen not to do, I may write them back and tell them the same thing. If it is a matter that will appear before you in the future, I will write them back and tell them it is coming up at such and such a meeting, we will keep you advised as to when that will occur or you may check our website with respect to a future meeting. If it is a policy that has never been addressed, I would write to them and say this is an issue that has never been addressed by the Committee and there is no policy on it currently. If you would like, I would be glad to schedule this on an agenda and provide your letter to the Advisory Committee and you may attend and make your case on the policy issue. I then go over those kinds of issues with your Chairperson and then we schedule the monthly agenda at the appropriate moment and move on. You have to look at each letter and make a determination as to what to do. Mr. Laughlin's letter is not something I would put on an agenda, I would read it and respond to it and say thank you very much and make some comments. Since it was addressed to Mr. Carroll he should reply and say thank you for writing, I have these opinions and if you have anything else please let me know, but thank you for providing us your opinion of that. I always respond to the letters and say thank you for giving us your opinion, but here is the way we are doing it or yes, we are consistent with that and that is going to be handled in such and such a time frame. You have to look at each one of them individually and address it. With respect to the website, the hits are based on the level of interest within the community. This Sub - committee got an issue, which was of relatively high value within the community and so we got a lot of hits for it and we got a lot of phone calls for it. I think the 55 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 article in the Naples Daily News a few days after the meeting generated a lot of the conversation internally in our organization about the hits and phone calls we got as a result of it. That is of prime importance, but if we are talking about cattails in System III I don't think we are going to get a lot of hits on the website over that issue. Mr. Carroll stated that from what I am hearing you say, I am really obligated to respond to those three letters. I actually did call the one fellow and did respond, then he wrote back again and I did not respond to that letter. Mr. Ward stated that the other thing you can do as a Chairperson is, if you get something and you don't know the answer to it and it really is an operational question, you can forward it on to me and ask me to respond and you write back to the resident and tell them that it was forwarded on to me. I do respond and I always copy the Committee on the letters when that happens. PRELIMINARY LIST OF ISSUES TO BE REVIEWED Mr. Carroll stated that I would like to review the Preliminary List of Issues that I came up with keeping in mind that some of these ought to be delayed because of our anticipating Mr. Brock's report and then perhaps any others that are not on here that you think ought to be, can be added. This list may have to be rearranged because half of these may need to wait until the Brock Report comes out. The first is "Evaluate Mr. Brock's report and that is an issue that will have to wait. Mr. Carroll stated that the second is Review the Manager's Job Description and Scope of Services. I put that on a week ago, but I think what I believe we are saying is, let's postpone that one. I am comfortable, if that feels right for you. Mr. Carroll continued that the third and fourth items to Consider approving a process for reviewing the performance of the Manager and determine if and when we should request bids for the manager's position for 2002 should all be postponed until the Brock Report comes out. We will have to decide to extend his contract or go through the process of requesting competition, but I don't think we are ready for that yet. 56 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Carroll stated that the next item may not involve the Brock Report and is to propose closer ties between the MSTBU and the Foundation Board. This is a little personal and I feel very strongly that it is a key element in our operation of Pelican Bay that these two organizations work closer together. I had some suggestions about what we might do about it and is that an issue that we can discuss without the Brock Report affecting it? Mr. Bawduniak stated that is a part of the way we do our job, as it exists today. I can't see the Brock Report getting into that. Mr. Carroll stated that is an issue we can deal with at the next meeting if we wanted to. Mr. Carroll stated that the sixth issue has to deal with the relationship and the working relationship of the MSTBU and Foundation and this says to consider moving the Manager and the staff into the Foundation offices at the Commons. The purpose of that would be gain, to have these two organizations physically together and hopefully working more closely together. That is an issue that we could talk about whether it is a good idea or not. I suspect Mr. Ward would not think it is a good idea, but I haven't asked him. Mr. Ward replied I don't have an opinion, that doesn't bother me at all. Mr. Vlasho stated that about two meetings ago we requested that Mr. Ward work with Mr. Kinney to begin discussions as to whether it could be done or how this could be worked out. If you want to change that you can, but right now he is charged with beginning to have those discussions and coming back to us from a logistics point of view. Mr. Ward replied yes, and I actually have started those discussions with Mr. Kinney. I do want to go back and make a comment on the item 513 about the Foundation Member of the Board. Remember in government, I have always told you that equality is extremely important and when you begin as an Advisory Committee or as a Commission to open up who sits at the table with you on the dais, you cannot essentially leave organizations out of that debate. To the extent that you have a policy or create a policy that would allow other organizations to sit at the table with you, you have to be equal in your treatment across the board with all of that. Whether it is the Foundation, or the Property Owners Association or Chanteclair Homeowners Association, you have to be equal in how you disperse that policy across your residential base. I would counsel 57 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 you that would not be a good idea to do, because if the Foundation Board sat with you here initially that might be great and then four months later it might be another group that says you are allowing the Foundation Board to sit there with you, we want to sit there too. It would be very difficult for you to say no, we don't want you to sit at the table with us. Be careful what you ask for in an instance like this. Mr. Carroll stated that maybe this can't be done, but I conceive of the Foundation being a very different organization from all the rest of them. It is part of the governing operation of Pelican Bay, so I want to give it, if I can, a different identification or identity than the myriad of others that you alluded to. Mr. Ward replied in the private sector that is easy to do, in the public sector that is not possible to do. You can't discriminate against one group over another because of a status that you perceive they have or do not have. You have to be equal in the treatment of all. Mr. Bawduniak stated that one of the issues I see there is voting. If you have the public coming, some very infrequently, most of them not knowing what we are doing and not knowing us and have a row of eleven people and the twelfth one sitting there and you have eleven votes and the twelfth doesn't vote, that could be a confusion factor to the public. That is a small negative, although I can see where Mr. Carroll is coming from. The Foundation is the only other group that levies taxes of a sort, so they have a special voice. They are spending our money and there is certain camaraderie of intent there, but there may be other ways to have a reserved seat up front. It would make them feel very welcome and respects the equality concept that we have to live with. Mr. Carroll stated that there would be no problem the other way. Mr. Ward replied no, it is a private organization so they may do what they want under the law, but in the public sector you have to be equal in the treatment of all. Mr. Sutphin stated as long as there are not two of us sitting on their dais. Mr. Ward replied that is a debatable point, but I would not recommend it. I am sure Mr. Weigel would say it is okay and it probably is, but it it's not good policy. M ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Carroll stated that you mentioned a point there. I think Mr. Weigel is more liberal in his interpretations. Mr. Ward replied he has probably not been sued as much as I have seen in my career. He is a very liberal attorney. Mr. Carroll stated that I called him a month ago when Mr. Vlasho appointed me to this Sub - committee and I went over some things about constraints and when I talked with Mr. Ward he was tougher than Mr. Weigel. Mr. Ward replied I take a very simple approach. Most of you know I represent municipal agencies and personally I handle over thirty of them. I have 150+ members at any one time that I am working on. I take a simple approach to it. Don't do anything in this business that you could be brought up on ethics charges for. Play it on the conservative side of the law when it comes to the implication of the ethics standards. Remember any one individual, i.e. Mr. Domenie, could run down to the State Attorney's office tomorrow and file an ethics charge and it reflects on you as an individual, not as an organization. I try to make sure that I at least advise my Boards, don't get into the debate, just don't do anything that would ever harm your integrity because that is what you go home with tonight is your integrity. I tend to be a little more conservative than some lawyers. You can't discriminate against one group over another because of a status that you perceive they have or do not have. You have to be equal in the treatment of all. I am totally convinced of that. I can't call Mr. Sutphin and kick things around a little and ask what we ought to do or what should be put on this list. There is no doubt in my mind that it affects our total ability to do things. Mr. Ward replied that your comment of I couldn't call up Mr. Sutphin and do that is a clear violation of the law. There is no question that even Mr. Weigel would tell you that you just don't have the authority under the law to do that. If the question is two or more board members who want to go to a Foundation meeting, is that legal? It probably is, it is probably not good policy, but it is okay to do that. I am indicating and I won't be different in the application of it in any way 59 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 anymore strictly than Mr. Weigel will, there are certain things you cannot do one of which you just mentioned, which is blatantly illegal. Mr. Carroll stated there is no question about that one, but this business of one -way communication that he says is okay and you feel is risky. I just want you to understand and you probably do, is that there is a trade off here and we are losing something. We are less effective. Mr. Ward replied it is risky. I would not necessarily agree with you on the fact that you are less effective. You work in the governmental sector. When you work in the public sector there are constraints that are placed on you and the legislature has essentially said as we move forward it wants government to be open in the application of the proceeding. That means it wants as much input from all of the public as you can garner in how you do your business. It doesn't want you as a matter of law to call Mr. Sutphin, Mr. Vlasho or Mr. Bawduniak and say this is what it is. The legislature is saying we want you to be more effective by opening up the process and allowing input from residents and the balance of the community in the process itself. I am not going to sit here and tell you others don't argue what you argue, that it is less effective, but at the end of the day what you deal with in Florida is a Sunshine Law that says we want to open up government to be more effective in the application of the way we provide services to residents, which we tax and they don't have the ability to say no to that tax. That is what government in Florida is all about. That is why the Sunshine Laws exist as a matter of law today. It is a part of the Florida Constitution and was a Constitutional Amendment in the mid- 1960's that was codified in law subsequent to the Constitutional Amendment. All of the residents of this great State that we live in have said we want government to be open in the application in the way in which we process and we believe that is a more effective way in which to provide it. What comes out of my mouth isn't necessarily my opinion, but what has been borne across the State since the mid - 1960's when all of the voters of this State said this is exactly what we want you to do and we, as a matter of right, believe that is more effective to us. That is the framework in which you operate. Mr. Carroll stated that I understand that framework but I don't agree that it is more effective, but I can't do anything about it. If we want to discuss Item #5 again, we can. .1 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Carroll stated that with regard to item #7 to decide whether to recommend downsizing of the MSTBU from eleven (11) members to Nine (9) members. Several years ago we had a Committee and we were fifteen (15) members and the Committee decided to move us to thirteen (13), then to eleven (11) and then to nine (9). We all approved that and the Commission essentially nodded their heads on that. We have gone two of the three steps and we would have gone in the spring of this year to nine (9) members had we not had all of the other confusion. I think this Sub - committee needs to decide whether we should stick with eleven (11) members and in effect say we don't want to follow what that other Sub - committee decided two years ago or not. Mr. Bawduniak asked Mr. Ward to enlightened the Sub - committee on the historical perspective of this issue. Obviously the Committee reviewed it in detail and had some valid reasoning for doing that and would benefit from hearing what you recollect. Mr. Carroll stated that when I first joined this Committee there were fifteen (15) members. I think the general perception that I had and there wasn't much disagreement, was that this Committee was too big. We wanted to shrink it and when it was brought up it was changed to thirteen (13) members and then to eleven (11) and there was very little discussion or objection to it. Now whether to go from eleven (11) to nine (9) members is a current issue and we can just say leave it at eleven (11) and recommend that to the Committee. Mr. Ward explained that prior to the MSTBU there was an Independent District that sat overlying this community that had a five (5) member independently elected Board. That is the normal size of a Board, anywhere between five (5) and nine (9), depending upon the size of the government that you work in. Most of them are five (5), large counties you will have at nine (9) and the mid -range is seven (7), but all municipal governments in Florida are essentially five (5). When we went from five (5) to fifteen (15) 1 suspect, although I was not a part of that discussion because at the time I was sitting on the PBID side of it and not the Collier County side of it, when they wrote the original Ordinance there was a load of interest as to who was going to sit on the Board. Because of the volume of people who wanted to be on the Board, I think the compromise the Commission came up with was to expand the Board to fifteen (15) individuals and added everybody on there that they wanted and it stayed that way for a very long time. Fifteen (15) 61 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 people are hard to work with on a Board, so a couple of years ago we had a long discussion about starting to reduce its size, but trying to keep a composition that showed some diversity within the community and we thought that going from fifteen (15) to five (5) was probably not a good idea, but to slowly start to reduce it a little to try to get the Board down to a size that was a little more manageable that you could actually work with on a little better basis at these monthly meetings. We went from fifteen (15) to thirteen (13) to eleven (11) and there was really no opposition and everyone was supportive of that. I still think it is a good idea to go down to the smaller number. It is just easier to work with from an administrative perspective also. It also goes to the issue of how you interact and interface with a Board member. It is easier to get work done with a smaller body than it is the larger body because the size itself just makes it hard to work with. Mr. Bawduniak asked aren't there also parameters that say we are a more mature than less mature community and while we have maintenance issues, etc., a lot of the build -out issues are disappearing and a lot of other land questions should be disappearing shortly? Mr. Ward replied in the affirmative. Mr. Sutphin stated that fifteen (15) members is certainly a horrendous size group to work with under the best of conditions. I would certainly not oppose a plan for shrinkage in the size of the board. Mr. Carroll stated that what I think we should do is just identify it as an issue and bring it up and discuss it some more. When I was talking to Mr. Brock last week, he mentioned the eleven (11) member Board. I guess he is assuming that we are eleven (11) and will keep it that way. I think his report is going to show eleven (11). That would not prevent us from perhaps next year or the following year saying, let's go down to nine (9) because it is too big. Mr. Bawduniak stated that I have to agree with the historical perspective from what we have heard here that nine (9) is probably better than eleven (11). It is more efficient and you have enough diversity to still have heated dialect, which is constructive. M ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Sutphin stated that it is interesting just in the thinking that has gone into this by people outside of this Committee that the Ordinance that got repealed called for a smaller group of seven (7) as an elected Board to basically perform the same functions. Mr. Carroll stated we would keep that one on the list. I don't know how much more information we can get on that, but it is going to become a matter of opinion I would guess. Mr. Carroll continued that we have covered Item #8. Item #9, 1 had considered an approach to acquaint the community with the changes that the Sub - committees are considering recommending, whether we use the Post, reports, etc. I am sensitive to this concern that we are doing things in the summer and not communicating with people. I know Mr. Brock has this very much on his mind, where you do not want to do what you did last year in that regard. The way I read him is that he is going to come out with his report and ask for comments and then kind of cycle it back and forth until he gets to January when we have a full compliment of people here, before he sees it headed towards finalization. That is what he is thinking. What I want us to think about is what do we need to do if we decide that we want to recommend to the full Committee that we reduce from eleven (11) members to nine (9), to use that as an example? Do we as a Sub - committee need to communicate with the public on this or do we say we don't need to do that, we are going to bring that to the Advisory Committee and the full Committee is going to deal with it? Mr. Bawduniak stated that we know whatever we come up with is going to go back to the full Committee for discussion, debate, acceptance or rejection. The public wants to know what is going on and since there is a bit of unsettled air in the community and you have done a very good job so far with your little articles in the Pelican Post, that you should tell them that these are items in the very preliminary stages. That makes it very clear that they are going to be or are being considered and they will be kept up to date on the final decisions made by the MSTBU Committee in its' entirety at sometime in the future. I guess it is better to err in telling them some things, which they may be ho hum about, rather than not tell them and have a minority of the people say uh oh we are being kept in the cold again and we don't know what you are doing. I would rather have them know we are doing something in an intermediary step, than to not tell 63 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 them anything and have them worried about what we're really doing. If that is not too much of a burden, I think the Post has been a big help. Keep them plugged in and know what that our actions are preliminarily and nowhere final, because they have to be discussed before the entire MSTBU. That sets the position of where we are in the hierarchy of getting things done with a particular task. Mr. Carroll stated that I would have to go somehow to Mr. Roellig. I obviously do not know what his Sub - committee is doing and both Sub - committees would need to be reported. I can do it for us, but I would have to get something from him somehow because I cannot talk to him. Mr. Ward replied we could coordinate that for you. Mr. Bawduniak stated that it sounds like more work and more communications, but does that make sense to you or do you have a bright idea to get that done without the work? Mr. Ward replied no, it takes work to get communications. Mr. Domenie stated that I sit on that Sub - committee and I can pass the work on at our next Sub - committee meeting. Mr. Sutphin stated that this is a slow on -going public education program. More and more people are becoming computer literate and are using the Internet for one thing or another. Whereas the Pelican Bay Post might not be available to someone in Michigan, but the web works anywhere in the world and they can certainly access the website from anywhere in the country that they are. If they want to stay informed, they can. One of the things that honestly bothers me is someone saying I was up North and did not know what was going on. That might have worked twenty or thirty years ago, but I am not sure it is as legitimate an excuse today as it was then. Mr. Bawduniak stated that if a very short article is in the Post, can't the same article be put on the website? Mr. Sutphin stated that is where the Foundation could come into play. They have a website. They can put anything they want on the website. If they want to put Mr. Carroll's articles on their website, I see no reason they cannot do that and I am sure that if they are asked they will. 64 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Ward stated that we could also put it on ours. Mr. Sutphin asked if there was a recommendation from the Committee to reduce the Committee to nine (9) members that got put on hold because of the issue over the Ordinance? Mr. Carroll replied it never got to that point. In other words it would have come up in January, but because of all of this other stuff it did not move forward. Mr. Sutphin asked if it was in the thinking pattern? Mr. Carroll replied that it was definitely in the thinking pattern because we had talked about doing it in three steps some three years ago. Mr. Sutphin asked if it seemed like a good idea then? Mr. Ward stated that it was and is still a good idea. Mr. Carroll stated that I would have to caution you that I don't think that you will find the full Committee in agreement on that issue. There are some that are going to want it at eleven (11) members. I am sort of neutral on it personally. Mr. Sutphin asked if the reductions to date have been done by attrition? Mr. Ward replied in the affirmative. We would amend the Ordinance, which is what we did not do this past year because of what was going on, to reduce it to nine (9) members and as the terms expire, then you just replace those expiring members. Mr. Carroll stated that you do get an issue. For example if in January we want to take it to nine (9), there are four (4) members whose terms are due to expire. If two of us decided to reapply, then there would be no room for any fresh blood on the Committee, which is the negative side of that. Mr. Sutphin stated that is certainly something that should be debated by the full Committee. Mr. Carroll asked if there are any items that need to go on the list? We have talked about holding some things back and indicated an interest in several of these that would require further discussion. 65 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Sutphin stated that it would be wonderful to have Mr. Brock's report because it will serve as the basis as to where you see the Sub - committee going in the future and will give us items of substance to talk about. Mr. Carroll stated that I agree and there may be others. Mr. Carroll explained that from what we have said we are going to postpone this item. INITIAL REACTION TO MR. BROCK'S REPORT IF IT IS AVAILABLE Mr. Carroll indicated that this item would be postponed because the report is not available as yet. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATIOM Mr. Charles Popper stated that he returned last week and two things absolutely startled me. One was the cattail removal. I know that this has been an ongoing program, but I think it is probably the worst thing that I have ever seen happen to this community. It looks like Agent Orange was disbursed and I don't know what kind of ecological involvement this has been, but from a pure looks point of view, I think it is an absolute travesty. I am sure there is some plans for it and if you would like to share that with me at some other time, I don't want to take the time of the Board today, but maybe they know what is going on. In terms of communications and you have spent a great deal of time talking about communications, I think that needs to be addressed. Mr. Popper continued that the other issue is that in the last two months, very frankly, U.S. 41 is again an absolute disaster. I know when people come back in October they are going to say this looks like the same as when we left in May or June. I bring these things up and if you want to bring them to the Board or do absolutely nothing about it that is entirely up to you. I think from a communication point of view, it would seem that it needs to be addressed somewhere. Mr. Carroll stated that with regard to U.S. 41 there has been much discussion, mostly frustration, and there is almost nothing that we can do about it. They have told us that they were going to finish to Vanderbilt Beach by July 15, which is a month gone by. Mr. Ward explained that what we are essentially doing is that as part of the Clam Bay Restoration Program and as we complete the interior tidal cuts east and west in the Clam Bay .. ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 system, we are starting to get tidal action in the northern part of Clam Bay. The more tidal action we get, we knew that there was going to be a time that once saltwater hit those cattails they would just die. We have gone in and because it was such a dense and so difficult of an area to work in, they have been cut down and are being treated. They will probably be left that way for about six months. We are going to take some water elevations over the fall and come up with a planting program to put other materials in there that are not cattails and are salt tolerant or salt friendly. I have told the Advisory Committee for a long time now that it is just not going to be a pretty site when we get in there and do all of this, which it isn't. Hopefully within the next twelve to eighteen months, we will start to see a little bit of a turnaround ecologically in that portion of the system. The one thing I was trying to do, although it is ugly, it is probably not as ugly as it would have been if we just had the saltwater in there and they all died and they would have stayed dead. That is what the intent is and what we are trying to do out there. Mr. Popper asked if there had been any communications to the public about what you are doing? Mr. Ward replied that Mr. Carroll has placed two articles in the Post. The Foundation had been notified and we also have a sign posted at both ends of the berm to let everyone know what we are doing. Most residents have said we are glad you put the sign up because that tells us most everything and I think Mr. Carroll's articles answered a lot of the questions. Mr. Sutphin stated that U.S. 41 has been a frustration to me also and I think there is an element of communication missing here and I am not so sure whose responsibility it is. As I understand it, the driving force is the State Department of Transportation. It is not the County's job and is not the PBSD's job. I am not sure the average resident understands that. Mr. Popper stated that I have been involved with this from various Board experience and it goes back many years to planning. From purely a frustration point of view, it just seems like government in its worst possible actions are taking place with this highway. I am wondering and maybe it is a naive question, but can we not approach this from another venue or somebody going to Tallahassee? We have lived with this for years and people have gotten injured and even killed as a result of that highway. Isn't there something else that can be done? 67 ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE 16JI August 9, 2001 Mr. Carroll stated that Commissioner Carter, with his level of frustration, got into it and he did go to the head of FDOT and reported in the newspaper a few weeks ago. The only satisfaction that he got was that it was on their high priority list. Does that mean they are going to be one year late instead of two? We have the bridge over the Gordon River that took five years and it still isn't finished. Mr. Popper stated that he feels that the public becomes apathetic after a while because they have been told the same thing you are telling me. I was at the meeting when they told us July and nothing has happened. Here we are now in the middle of August and after a few months I see minimal progress. Mr. Carroll stated that there has been a reasonable amount of progress in the last three weeks in this area. Mr. Sutphin stated that I made one call to the State Highway Department in Fort Myers and the people who are in charge of the project. I was told that the contractor has a performance clause on the entire stretch and he is under no obligation in the contract to complete a specific section and then move onto the next section. It is for the total job. The contractor is going to perform the work in the manner that is best for him, not what is best for the driving public. That is a bad contract in my opinion. Secondly, there is an interagency problem. Some work was hung up for some extended period of time waiting for the Department of Environmental Protection to come and inspect the new water line before they could rip the old water line out. Everything was on hold until one bureau got in to check the work of the other. I agree that it has not been well communicated. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 4:30 P.M. James Carroll, Chairman - F i a 4 6 Carter ,,..._..._ Henning Mac'Kie AGENDA Coletta COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL METROOMO AD., FRIDAY, SENT BUIER 7, 2001 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: July 19, 2001 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. BCC RECAPS 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. BD- 2001 -AR -985, Miles L. Scofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing Peter A. Guglielmi, requesting a 25 -foot extension for a boat dock facility protruding 35 feet into the waterway (45 feet as measured from the property line) for property located at 119 Heron Avenue, further described as Lot 25, Block T, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates, Unit 3, Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Misc. Corres: Date: Item# (CQ.) t 1 Copies Ta 16J1 B. BD- 2001 -AR -938, Miles L. Scofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing Henry and Monica McVicker, requesting a 45 -foot boat dock extension to allow for a boat dock protruding 65 feet into the waterway for property located on Keewaydin Island, Lot 3.5, South Naples Shores, in Sections 23 & 24, Township 51 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. C. VA- 2001 -AR -979, Terrance Kepple, of Kepple Engineering, representing Shader - Lombardo Properties, LLC, requesting a 12.1 -foot variance from the Vanderbilt Villas PUD required distance between structure setback of 20 feet to 7.9 feet for property located at 515 Roma Court, further described as Lot 22, Vanderbilt Villas, in Section 21, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. D. PUD- 2000 -21, Robert L. Duane, A.I.C.P., of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Robert Vocisano and Angelo Favretto, requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Terafina PUD for a maximum of 850 residential dwelling units, golf course, clubhouse, and a maximum of 40,000 sq. ft. of Neighborhood Village commercial retail uses, for property located approximately 1.5 miles east of I -75, one mile north of Immokalee Road (C.R. 846), in Section 16, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 646.5± acres. E. PUDZ- 2001 -AR -432, Karen Bishop of PMS, Inc. of Naples, representing Kenco Development, Inc., requesting a rezone from "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development known as Indigo Lakes PUD and "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Indigo Lakes PUD for the purpose of increasing acreage from 140.85 acres to 181.37 acres and reducing density from 3.14 to 2.43 units per acre for a maximum of 442 residential dwelling units, for property located on Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), south of the existing Oak Ridge Middle School, in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. F. PUD -92 -08(1) Dwight Nadeau, of RWA, Inc., representing William T. Higgs, requesting a rezone from PUD to PUD known as White Lake Industrial Park PUD having the effect of changing the name to White Lake Corporate Park PUD, increasing the industrial land use from 67.4 acres to 86.3 acres, and changing the property ownership, for property located northeast of and adjacent to the intersection I -75 and Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. G. RZ- 2001 -AR -823, Tim Hancock of Vanasse & Daylor, LLP, representing Sunset, LLC, requesting a rezone from "GC" Golf Course to "RSF -4" for a maximum of 12 single - family dwelling units for property located at 100 Forest Hills Boulevard, in Section 19, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 3.51± acres H. CU- 2001 -AR -1156, Robert Duane, of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Collier County Public Works/Wastewater Administration, requesting Conditional Use for an essential service allowing for the expansion of the South County Water Reclamation Facility per Section 2.6.9.2 of the Land Development Code for property located on 5600 Warren Street, in Section 20, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 48:1: acres : - -- 2 16J1 I. PDI- 2001 -AR -949, Donald A. Pickworth, Esq., of Donald A. Pickworth, P.A., representing Naples Commercial, LLC, requesting an insubstantial change determination to the Forest Glen of Naples PUD Master Plan, to reinstate access points for the commercial tract for property located in Section 2, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. J. LDC and Related Amendments OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 8. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM 9. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 10. ADJOURN 9n1011CCPC AGENDA/SM/lo 3 "lain L / V 16A - i?nning AGENDA olette COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2001, IN THE BOARD O ENTE, COUNTY 1 COMMISSIONERS MIAMI OONER EAST, NAPLES, ROOM, , ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL- A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- AUGUST 16, 2001 Nyisc. corres. 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES — RUSSEL PRIDDY Cate. �_ _,..... 5. BCC REPORT Item# 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS Copies b: A. BD- 2001 -AR -938, Miles L. Scofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing Henry and Monica McVicker, requesting a 45 -foot boat dock extension to allow for a boat dock protruding 65 feet into the waterway for property located on Keewaydin Island, Lot 3.5, South Naples Shores, in Sections 23 & 24, Township 51 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Ross Gochenaur) B. BD- 2001 -AR -985, Miles L. Scofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing Peter A. Guglielmi, requesting a 25 -foot extension for a boat dock facility protruding 35 feet into the waterway (45 feet as measured from the property line) for property located at 119 Heron Avenue, 1 16J1 further described as Lot 25, Block T, Conners Vanderbilt Beach Estates, Unit 3, Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida (Coordinator: Ross Gochenaur) C. PUDZ- 2001 -AR -620, Anita L. Jenkins, AICP, of WilsonMiller, Inc., representing Long Bay Partners, L.L.C., requesting a rezone from "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" and "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development known as Mediterra PUD having the effect of increasing acreage from 954± acres to 1168± acres, adding a Village Center District with a maximum of 20,000 sf, reducing density from 0.56 units per acre to 0.65 units per acre, for property located approximately one mile west of I -75 along the north side of the Livingston Road East/West corridor in Sections 11 and 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Ray Bellows) 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM 11. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 12. ADJOURN CCPC AGENDA/SMAo 2 1611 ITEM 7 -A TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE: 24 JULY 2001 RE: BD 2001 -AR -985 GUGLIELMI BOAT DOCK EXTENSION AGENT /APPLICANT: Agent: Miles L. Scofield Scofield Marine Consulting 3584 -B Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 Owner: Peter A. Guglielmi TR 8111 Woodside Lane Burr Ridge, IL 60525 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting a 25 -foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, which would allow for a boat docking facility protruding a total of 45 feet into the waterway. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 119 Heron Avenue, further described as Conner's Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 3, Block T, Lot 25, Section 29, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. PURPOSE /DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the project is to create a boat docking facility which would protrude a total of 45 feet into the waterway and consist of a U- shaped dock and boatlift. The requested extension would allow an additional 10 feet seaward of the dock for temporary mooring of a second vessel, although no mooring pilings for this are proposed. The shoreline is reinforced by a rip -rap revetment, and the property line is at one point 15 feet from the toe of the rip -rap. The protrusion is measured from the most restrictive point -the property line - and the dock itself would protrude no more than 25 feet into the actual waterway if measured from the toe of the rip -rap. The entire facility, including the 10 feet allowed for the second vessel, would protrude a total of 45 feet beyond the property line. -1- m ,m / 7 ME — - - -' - ttttt itttt Stitt itttt itttt ttttt= immr ittit itt�t tt��t Stitt ttttt o ..- .••..•• S WE m li ON mm OVOtl •owmnd- 1lgdHIV � IIyy � 3j m m Ld mm I g €jj q WE E + 1`nFY� # S� . _ . i�� � I a FRANK BoUIFV (C.R. 651 o n 113 I I 9a E NF� R y P tit a x @ 88Sg y C n i m ,m / 7 a LU co Q Q O J m� a� �I i �I ZI0 ai — - - -' ovoi mmsoNV.n o S li S U OVOtl •owmnd- 1lgdHIV � IIyy � 3j P Ld I g €jj q �5 E + 1`nFY� # S� i�� � I a FRANK BoUIFV (C.R. 651 o n 113 I I 9a E NF� R y P tit a x @ 88Sg y C n I W Q (n s'N iFrat I Inri O TµF1 AL6 tR/d� (U.& a1) y QQygg I g�g�j 7q��Q� �3y (L a 17 Am 1 I Z gg '3 106 lro ) �, a LKiy jjQtl30NVA uuff i � w q7 J � GULF OF MEXICO 8 9 a LU co Q Q O J m� a� �I i �I ZI0 ai 16J1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Existing: Single- family residence, zoned RSF -3 Surrounding: North - Single- family residence, zoned RSF -3 South - Single- family residence, zoned RSF -3 East - Heron Avenue ROW West - Vanderbilt Waterway EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Planning Services staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. Section 2.6.22. (Manatee protection) of the Collier County Land Development Code, is applicable to all multi -slip docking facilities with ten (10) slips or more. The proposed facility consists of one slip and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. View from site looking N along waterway -2- ivV g � ; � ��.�a ��� � 4 �!' . ,�,. . ��� � w a `�_,.� r a,. �' '�,� ', .�,,:. §3 i ;�; �%� •� .� tb:f x—J�+:y =rte i� �'s.:�.`. �. '��aa, Staff Comments: 16J1 Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 2.6.21 of the Collier County Land Development Code and finds the following: a. Whether or not the number of dock facilities or slips to be located on the subject property is appropriate in relation to the length of waterfront property available for the location of the proposed facilities. The single dock with one slip, and temporary mooring accommodations for one visitor's vessel, is appropriate in relation to the property's 193 feet of waterfrontage. b. Whether or not the water depth where the proposed dock facility is to be located is sufficient to allow for safe mooring of the vessel, thereby necessitating the extension request. Due to the location of the rip -rap revetment in relation to the property line (see Item "e ") there is not enough water depth to allow construction of the proposed facility without an extension. C. Whether or not the proposed dock facility and moored vessels in combination may have an adverse impact to navigation within an adjacent navigable channel. The waterway at the site is relatively broad, and current aerial photos do not reveal the presence of a distinct navigable channel. The proposed facility should not have an adverse impact on navigation in the adjacent waterway. d. Whether or not the proposed dock design and moored vessel protrude greater than 25 percent of the width of the _waterway or greater than 20 feet for boathouses, and will a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock structures /moored vessel(s) on the opposite side of the waterway be maintained in order to ensure reasonable waterway width for navigability. The requested 45 feet represents 22 percent of the waterway width. The actual dock, with the requested 10 feet for temporary mooring, would measure less. According to an addendum to the application submitted by the petitioner, the dock facilities on the opposite side of the waterway protrude 35 feet beyond the seawall. Over 60 percent of the waterway width would be maintained for navigability. -4- 16J1 e. Whether or not there are special conditions related to the subject property or waterway which will justify the proposed dimension and location of the subject dock. As noted earlier, the rip -rap revetment is up to 15 feet seaward of the property line, leaving no room to construct a viable facility without an extension. The waterway is relatively broad. A dock extending 30 feet into Vanderbilt Waterway was approved for a similar property on Flamingo Avenue to the north (Block U, Lot 23), and another to 30.5 feet into the narrower canal for a property on Egret Avenue to the south (Block S, Lot 26). f. Whether or not the proposed dock is of minimal dimensions necessary in order to adequately secure the moored vessel while providing reasonable access to the boat for routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area. The proposed dock is not of minimal dimensions, but the requested deck area is not excessive. The walkways around the lift are minimal, and the deck area to the north would be used for loading and unloading the vessel. g. Whether or not the proposed structure is of minimal dimensions to minimize the impact on the view of the waterway by surrounding property owners. The dimensions, and the location of the proposed facility at the waterway end of the street, are such that the view of surrounding property owners would not be adversely affected. h. Whether or not the moored vessel is in excess of 50 percent of the length of the waterfrontage such that the addition of a dock structure will increase the impact on, or negatively impact the view of, the surrounding property owners. The facility is intended to accommodate one 28 -foot vessel and temporarily accommodate one visitor's vessel of indeterminate length. In view of the property's 193 feet of waterfrontage, it is unlikely that these in combination would exceed 50 percent of the length (95 feet). There would be no negative impact on the view of surrounding property owners. -s- 16J1 i. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock /vessel combination is such that it may infringe upon the use of neighboring properties, including any dock structures. The facility would be set back 25 feet from the property line to the south, and about 120 feet from the property line to the northeast. The location and design of the facility, and the configuration of the subject property, are such that the dock would not interfere with the use of the existing docks on either property. j. Regarding benthic organisms in the vicinity of the proposed extension: (A) Whether or not seagrasses are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock. No seagrasses are located within 200 feet of the proposed facility. (B) Whether the proposed dock is subject to the manatee protection requirements of this code (Sec. 2.6.22). Planning Services staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. At least one "Manatee Area" sign shall be posted during construction. Appeal of Boat Dock Extension to Board of Zoning Appeals As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Collier County Planning Commission takes action, an aggrieved petitioner or adversely affected property owner may appeal such final action to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Such appeal shall be filed with the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator within 14 days of the action by the Planning Commission. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant shall be advised that he /she proceeds with construction at his /her risk during this period. Staff Recommendation: Based upon the above findings, staff recommends the Collier County Planning Commission approve Petition BD 2001 -AR -985 subject to the stipulations listed in the resolution. -6- 16J1 PREPARED BY: 0 HENAUR D TE PLAN ER II REVIEWED BY: �% AAeA�� 8 aoo0'L SAN MURRAY, AICP, DATE CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER THOMAS E. KUCK, P.E. DATE INTERIM PLANNING SERVICES DIRECTOR APPROVED BY: C�) I VM L4 IZ1 JOH M. DUNNUCK, III, INTERIM ADMINISTRATOR DATE COM UNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Petition Number: BD 2001 -AR -985 Staff Report for 20 September 2001 for CCPC meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: JOYCEANNA J. RAUTIO, CHAIRMAN -7- I 16J1 CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 01- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD- 2001 -AR -985 FOR AN EXTENSION OF A BOAT DOCK ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance 91 -102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly elected and constituted Planning Commission for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 25 -foot extension of a boat dock from the permitted 20 feet to allow for a 45 -foot boat dock facility in an RSF -3 zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.6.21. of the Collier County Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given the opportunity to be heard by this Commission in public meeting assembled, and the Commission having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Collier County Planning Commission of Collier County, Florida, that: The petition filed by Miles L. Scofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing Peter A. Guglielmi Trust, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Conner's Vanderbilt Beach Estates Unit 3, Block T, Lot 25, as described in Plat Book 3, Page 89, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. be and the same is hereby approved for a 25 —foot extension of a boat dock from the permitted 20 feet to allow for a 45 —foot boat docking facility in the RSF -3 zoning district wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: 1. All docks, or mooring pilings, whichever protrude the greater into the water, regardless of length shall have reflectors and house numbers four (4) inches minimum size installed at the outermost end on both sides. 14J1 I 2. In order to address the protection of manatees, at least one (1) "Manatee Area" sign shall be posted during construction. 3. Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection shall be presented prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. All exotic vegetation as defined in Section 3.9.6.4.1 of the Land Development Code shall be removed from the site and the property shall be maintained exotic -free in perpetuity. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number BD- 2001 -AR -985 be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of , 2001. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JOYCEANNA J. RAUTIO, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: JOHN M. DUNNUCK, III Executive Secretary Community Development and Environmental Services Interim Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: MaxjoA6 M. Student Assistant County Attorney RG /m 16J1 z; DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION PETITION Petition number: BD- 2001 -AR -985 PETER A. GUGLIELMI Planner: PROJECT # 2001060003 DATE: 6/5/01 ROSS GOCHENAUR " • -. Received: ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF Property owner: Peter A. Guglielmi, TR Owner's Address: 8111 Woodside Lane Burr Ridge, IL 60525 -0000 Telephone: ( 630) 654-1440 Fax: ( 630) 654 -8690 Agent's Name: Miles L. Scofield - Scofield Marine Consulting Agent's Address: 3584 -B Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104 Telephone: 643 -1900 Fax: 643 -6632 Legal Description of Subject Property: Subdivision: Conners Vanderbilt Unit 3 Lot (s) 25 Block (s ) "T" Beach Estates Section 29 Twp. 48 Range 25 Property I.D. # 27635040007 COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SERVICES /CURRENT PLANNING 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE - NAPLES, FL 34104 PHONE (941) 403- 2400/FAX (941) 643 -6968 PAGE 1 OF 8 16J1 Address of Subject Property: 119 Heron Ave ..Naples Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: RSF -3 S e F mil Residence Adjacent Zoning & Land use: A site plan to scale showing dimensions and location of existing and proposed dock structures, as well as a cross section showing the facility in relation to mean high/low water and shoreline (bank, seawall or rip -rap revetment) should be submitted with this application. Site Information: Width of waterway: __Lo ft.; measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ® other (specify) laser rangefinder Total property water frontage: 19 3 ft. Setbacks: provided 25 ft. required __L5 ft. Total protrusion of proposed facility into water 3 5 ft. Number and length of vessels to use facility: 1. 2 8 ft., 2. ft. 3. ft. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total Protrusion into the waterway of each: Most docks in the residential area extend out 20 ft but they are Iona- -d in th manmade canals The applicant's dock only extends 20 ft= out from th shoreline but the property line is 15 ft inland We are requesting 45 ft total in order to temporarily tie a boat up on the outside of dock. '' I• •: �� I WMANVIal Lei 044111 RIM PAGE 2 OF 8 Zoning Land use Length of existing dock facility N Vanderbilt Waterway & Canal E RSF -3 Single Family Home 5 ft. S RSF -3 Single Family Home 20 ft. w/ Boathouse W Vanderbilt Waterway A site plan to scale showing dimensions and location of existing and proposed dock structures, as well as a cross section showing the facility in relation to mean high/low water and shoreline (bank, seawall or rip -rap revetment) should be submitted with this application. Site Information: Width of waterway: __Lo ft.; measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ® other (specify) laser rangefinder Total property water frontage: 19 3 ft. Setbacks: provided 25 ft. required __L5 ft. Total protrusion of proposed facility into water 3 5 ft. Number and length of vessels to use facility: 1. 2 8 ft., 2. ft. 3. ft. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total Protrusion into the waterway of each: Most docks in the residential area extend out 20 ft but they are Iona- -d in th manmade canals The applicant's dock only extends 20 ft= out from th shoreline but the property line is 15 ft inland We are requesting 45 ft total in order to temporarily tie a boat up on the outside of dock. '' I• •: �� I WMANVIal Lei 044111 RIM PAGE 2 OF 8 16J1 The following criteria, (pursuant to Section 2.6.21.3 of the Land Development Code) shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Collier County Planning Commission, and by the Planning Commission in its decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. Please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Attach additional pages if necessary. 1. What are the number of dock facilities or slips to be located on the subject property in relation to the length of waterfront property available (include required setbacks) for the location of the proposed dock facilities? We are proposing to install one dock with a boat lift and requesting to temporarily moor on outside of dock There is 193 if of shoreline with minimum setbacks of 25 ft., required setbacks are 15 ft. 2. Is there sufficient water depth to allow for safe mooring of the vessel without the use of a dock facility extension request? There is sufficient water depth within 20 ft.-of the seawall but the problem is the property is located 15 ft landward of the rip rap seawall. We can't build a dock without an extension. 3. Will the proposed dock facility and moored vessel(s) in combination have an adverse impact to navigation within an adjacent navigable channel? Rio. As stated above the dock only extends 20 ft into the waterway. Mooring on the outside slip will be temporary and the waterway is wide enough for proposed dock not to impact navigation. 4. Does the proposed dock design and moored vessel protrude greater than 25 percent of the width of the navigable canal or greater than 20 feet for boathouses, and is a minimum of 50 percent of the platted canal width between dock structures /moored vessel(s) on the opposite side of the canal maintained in order to ensure reasonable waterway width for navigability? _Please note the proposed dock only protrudes 10% of the waterway, with the added distance to the property line, the • • • • ZaTre RTC= WAAKOYMN ST.-MR&I atza • I R • • • NISR - • - - • 45 ft., it protrudes 22% of the waterway. PAGE OF 8 More than 50% of waterway is left open. 16J1 5. Are there special conditions related to the subject property or waterway which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the subject dock? Yes_ The applicant bought the property with the existing conditions - the rip rap seawall was constructed waterward of the property line, thereby the need for a BDE. The waterway is wide enough to allow for the extension. 6. Is the proposed dock of minimal dimensions necessary in order to adequately secure the moored vessel while providing reasonable access to the boat for routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area? We believe it is. The access catwalks on each side of the lift are 3 & 4 ft. wide allowing reasonable access to the boat. The main dock is 12 ft. wide, but within 20 ft. of seawall. 7. Is the proposed structure of minimal dimensions to minimize the impact of the view of the waterway by surrounding property owners? Proposed dock and lift are located on end of cul de sac with no apparent impact view to surrounding neighbors. Setback from nearest neighbor is 25 ft. Again, dock will be out 20 ft. from seawall. 8. Is the moored vessel in excess of fifty (50) percent of the length of the waterfrontage such that the addition of a dock structure will increase the impact on or negatively impact the view of the waterway by surrounding property owners? No_ The proposed moored vessel is 28 ft. and the length of the waterfrontage is 193 lf. View will not be impacted by the proposed dock and lift. PAGE 4 OF 8 [MII 9. Will the proposed location and design of the dock /vessel combination be such that it may infringe upon the use of neighboring properties, including any existing dock structures? No. The neighbor to the south has his dock located on the canal side as does the neighbor to the east. Proposed dock and lift will not infringe upon neighboring properties. 10. Regarding existing benthic organisms in the vicinity of the proposed extension: (a) Are seagrasses located within 200 feet of the proposed dock? No. (b) Is the proposed dock is subject to the manatee protection requirements of this code (Sec. 2.6.22)? No. In addition to the above, the following criteria shall apply to Boathouses. Please indicate whether or not the following fisted criteria have been met: Criteria Minimum side setback requirement Maximum protrusion into waterway Standard 15 feet 25 percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less Complies YES[] NO ❑ YES❑ NO ❑ APPUCATION FOR DOCK FACILrrY LXTENSION PETMON OF Cri= Maximum height Max. number of boathouses per site All boathouse structures shall be completely open on all four (4) sides 16J1 Standard 15 feet as measured from top of seawall or bank, whichever is more restrictive One (1) Roofing material and roof color shall be the same as materials and colors used on the principal structure or may be of palm frond "chickee" style Co— mpl_ies YES❑ NO YES ❑ NO ❑ YES [:1 NO YES ❑ NO ❑ I HEREBY ATTEST THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I UNDERSTAND THAT, IN ADDITION TO APPROVAL OF THIS DOCK EXTENSION, A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. I UNDERSTAND THAT IF THIS DOCK EXTENSION PETITION IS APPROVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, AN AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNER MAY FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE HEARING. IF I PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION DURING THIS TIME, I DO SO AT MY OWN RISK. PAGE 6 OF 8 16J1 ,a DOCK FACILITY EXTENSIONIBOA THOUSE ESTABLISHMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET! REQUIREMENTS # OF COP>�S REQUIRED 1. Completed Application 14 2. Completed Owner/Agent Affidavit, Notarized 1 3. Pre-application notes /minutes 14 4. Site Plan illustrating all of the following: 14 a. The lot and dimensions where proposed docking facility is to be located. b. All yard setbacks c . Required setbacks for the dock facility d. The total number and configuration of the proposed facilities, etc. (include all dimensions to scale). e . The water depth where the proposed dock facility is to be located and the distance to the navigable channel. (Water depth at mean low tide should be shown at approximately every five (5) feet of length for the total length of the proposed facility. f . Illustrate the land contour of the property on which the dock facility is proposed g. The dock facility should be illustrated from an aerial view, as well as side view. 5. Application Fee and Data Conversion Fee. Check shall be made - payable to Collier County Board of Commissioners As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary _�4bmittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. Agent/Appli A01k) Signature NS[ON PETMON - 3/98 Date PAGE 7 OF 8 r• faN.1!; ;; .t�.1'IAi�! f 11111 Sam 111« 'n .It�.�- �. • P • ►.. a . Vr- wmati'_: 6J es 0 wo- FO-O..md r r E Z ♦ . milia! I -; al At Is3i� I& - V-4d wowums I among m9pq.- .1.1�.�is1► � � � 1 � Ualum� 0 :. IFOW- - cs 1i1t1rn :[es:6: :16M,; 3 i. :;4 --as -� / / 0 .1� O o" •S J J w a. q 16J1 zz� w Li o O Z LLJ !z rb U z F- `L`'V �� ��k -q _ � Lo I ° P \ \j /hod 4, Iwo c°yWm 0 \ / r1 0 [�, N � A. / oo. 1 .00, �S= � 1 w z J H �w � NI w F- Cl- s�N 0 J N n- 0- 1 1 J L ,OL•92 r86.8a M.SL.i�Z.00N °Z � �F m °v to Z K LO �N N z il8 iL—j LLJ z ° ,sz M z Q <w Of 0Z Q i-0 a- 9w i owo 16J1 g '2 REQUESTED BDE 45' to .ice, w i. q E N st q LO J Q J Q_ Of �: E, w z J H LLJ Lin "In EL O x IL w u ii r i ii cn W N O d. C7 W Z N Z 20 m P= W U a� O to LL Z w O w U a� O C� Z p �W Q O W- Z ow W Z (r)F- W ziE zz LO q- w 0 m 0 LLJ V) w Or w ry 16J1 O V 03 O q to EN o c� A to w 0 w to u ) FAB o m a 0.+ Q Q Z 0 U W U) C� O w U co W J Q U Ln ui 0 z J z o r IL z � 3 J m o in �- W� a Y = .0 = Q' �7 ° y z F- z o LLI o AGENDA ITEM 7 -13 16J1 MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE: 23 JULY 2001 RE: BD 2001 -AR -938, MCVICKER BOAT DOCK EXTENSION AGENT /APPLICANT: Agent: Miles L. Scofield Scofield Marine Consulting 3584 -B Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 Owner: Henry J. McVicker 4100 Cutlass Lane Naples, FL 34102 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting a 45 -foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, which would allow for a boat docking facility protruding a total of 65 feet into the waterway. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on Keewaydin Island, further described as Lot 3.5, South Naples Shores, Sections 23 & 24, Township 51 South, Range 25 East. PURPOSE /DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the project is to create a boat docking facility which would protrude a total of 65 feet into the waterway and consist of a dock and two slips, including one boat lift. Keewaydin is an unbridged barrier island, subdivided into long, narrow, 5 -acre lots running east -west between the waterway and the Gulf of Mexico. The base zoning of these docks is "A" (Rural Agricultural) with an "ST" (Special Treatment) overlay indicating an area of environmental sensitivity. Since the development area is less than 20 acres and involves clearing of less than 10 percent of the native vegetation on site, this project is exempt from the requirement for Environmental Advisory Council review. Owners of these lots avail themselves of the LDC provision that allows a dock as a principal use on unbridged barrier islands, as the owner of the subject property has done. These docks are typically the sole means of access to the property. -1- I W 4 ^ S Z f 0 � W U O y GYMS 7 S 9 7 b A � � � J Z n M a r1 � � ��•• r rrr „xa a CL TQ W a 0 Q U 0 1a ffi z 0 F- f- W d OVA is, CL TQ W a 0 Q U 0 1a ffi z 0 F- f- W d r--4 W VIEW LOOKING TO THE NORTH OF THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY. VIEW LOOKING TO THE SOUTH OF THE APPLICANT'S PROPERTY. (applicant's photos) W r"4 W VIEW OF THE SHORELINE ON APPLICANT'S PROPERTY. NOTICE THE SURVEY STAKE IN CENTER OF PHOTO ON BEACH, THE DOCK WALKWAY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED 15 FT. TO THE LEFT IN OPEN AREA. NO MANGROVES WILL BE IMPACTED. (applicant's photos) 16J1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Existing: Unimproved lot, zoned A -ST Surrounding: North - Unimproved lot, zoned A -ST South - Unimproved lot, zoned A -ST East - Waterway West - Gulf of Mexico EVALUATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Planning Services staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. Section 2.6.22. (Manatee protection) of the Collier County Land Development Code, is applicable to all multi -slip docking facilities with ten (10) slips or more. The proposed facility consists of two slips and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. Staff Comments: Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 2.6.21 of the Collier County Land Development Code and finds the following: a. Whether or not the number of dock facilities or slips to be located on the subject property is appropriate in relation to the length of waterfront property available for the location of the proposed facilities. The proposed single dock with two slips is appropriate in relation to the 157 feet of waterfrontage, particularly since the principal means of access to the property is by boat. b. Whether or not the water depth where the proposed dock facility is to be located is sufficient to allow for safe mooring of the vessel, thereby necessitating the extension request. According to the drawing attached to the application, water depth at the site is very the proposed facility could not be constructed extension. -2- petitioner's shallow, and without this ri C. Whether or not the proposed dock facility and moored vessels in combination may have an adverse impact to navigation within an adjacent navigable channel. According to the petitioner's the site is about 600 feet rangefinder, and the proposed impact on navigation. application, the waterway at wide as measured by laser facility would have no adverse d. Whether or not the proposed dock design and moored vessel protrude greater than 25 percent of the width of the waterway or greater than 20 feet for boathouses, and will a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock structures /moored vessel(s) on the opposite side of the waterway be maintained in order to ensure reasonable waterway width for navigability . The proposed 65 -foot facility would occupy only about 11 percent of the width of the 600 -foot wide waterway. There would be no impact on navigation. e. Whether or not there are special conditions related to the subject property or waterway which will justify the proposed dimension and location of the subject dock. Due to the shallow water and mangrove growth along the shoreline, Keewaydin docks typically require relatively long extensions, some in excess of 150 feet. The proposed facility would be similar in protrusion and configuration to existing docks in the area. f. Whether or not the proposed dock is of minimal dimensions necessary in order to adequately secure the moored vessel while providing reasonable access to the boat for routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area. DEP requirements limit the deck area of Keewaydin docks, and that of the proposed facility is minimal. g. Whether or not the proposed structure is of minimal dimensions to minimize the impact on the view of the waterway by surrounding property owners. Houses on these relatively large lots are normally situated on the Gulf side and, in any case, the dock would be approximately centered on the 157 -foot waterfrontage. The view of surrounding property owners would not be affected. -3- 16J1 h. Whether or not the moored vessel is in excess of 50 percent of the length of the waterfrontage such that the addition of a dock structure will increase the impact on, or negatively impact the view of, the surrounding property owners. The proposed facility would accommodate two vessels of 32 and 18 feet. In combination, these would occupy only about 32 percent of the length of the waterfrontage. i. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock /vessel combination is such that it may infringe upon the use of neighboring properties, including any dock structures. The proposed facility would be set back 67 feet from the south property /riparian line and 40 feet from the north. There would be no infringement on the use of similar docks if constructed on the neighboring lots. j. Regarding benthic organisms in the vicinity of the proposed extension: (A) Whether or not seagrasses are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock. No seagrasses are located within 200 feet of the proposed facility. (B) Whether the proposed dock is subject to the manatee protection requirements of this code (Sec. 2.6.22). Planning Services staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. At least one "Manatee Area" sign shall be posted during construction. Appeal of Boat Dock Extension to Board of Zoning Appeals As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Collier County Planning Commission takes action, an aggrieved petitioner or adversely affected property owner may appeal such final action to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Such appeal shall be filed with the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator within 14 days of the action by the Planning Commission. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Planning Commission, the applicant shall be advised that he /she proceeds with construction at his /her risk during this period. -4- 16J1 'j Staff Recommendation: Based upon the above findings, staff recommends the Collier County Planning Commission approve Petition BD 2001 -AR -938 subject to the stipulations listed in the resolution. PREPARED BY: Rt5S8 GO ENAUR DA E PLANNE II REVIEWED BY: EMAMAJ SUSA1V MURRAY, AICP, / DATE CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER P , ILL 2-:?112-51291 THOMAS E. KUCK, P.E. DATE INTERIM PLANNING SERVICES DIRECTOR •- '• g'r 7/c, I JOfp M. B1JNNTJCX, III, INTERIM ADMINISTRATOR DATE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Petition Number: BD 2001 -AR -938 Staff Report for 20 September 2001 for CCPC meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: JOYCEANNA J. RAUTIO, CHAIRMAN -5- 16J1 CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 01- RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BD- 2001 -AR -938 FOR AN EXTENSION OF A BOAT DOCK ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance 91 -102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly elected and constituted Planning Commission for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 45 -foot extension of a boat dock from the permitted 20 feet to allow for a 65 -foot boat dock facility in an A -ST zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.6.21. of the Collier County Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given the opportunity to be heard by this Corrunission in public meeting assembled, and the Commission having considered all matters presented; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Collier County Planning Commission of Collier County, Florida, that: The petition filed by Miles L. Scofield, of Scofield Marine Consulting, representing Henry and Monica McVicker, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lot 3.5. South Naples Shores, as described in Plat Book 3, Page 11, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. be and the same is hereby approved for a 45 —foot extension of a boat dock from the permitted 20 feet to allow for a 65 —foot boat docking facility in the A -ST zoning district wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: I. All docks, or mooring pilings, whichever protrude the greater into the water, regardless of length shall have reflectors and house numbers four (4) inches minimum size installed at the outermost end on both sides. 16J1 2. In order to address the protection of manatees, at least one (1) "Manatee Area" sign: shall be posted during construction. 3. Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection shall be presented prior to issuance of a building permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number BD -2001 - AR -938 be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and filed with the County Cleric's Office. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of 2001. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JOYCEANNA J. RAUTIO, CHAIRMAN ATTEST: JOHN M. DUNNUCK, III Executive Secretary Community Development and Environmental Services Interim Administrator Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjorie M. Student Assistant County Attorney RG /cw Petition Planner: 16J1 E; DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION PETITION ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF Property owner: -- Henry J McVicker Owner's Address: 4100 Cutlass Lane Naples, FL 34102 Telephone: 430 -2261 Fax: 430 -6557 Agent's Name: Miles L. Scofie-ld _ Scofield Marine Consulting Agent's Address: 3584 -B Ex -hanger Ave Naples FL 34.1 04 Telephone: 643-1900 Fax: 643 -6632 Legal Description of Subject Property: ( SEE ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION) Subdivision: South Naples Shores Unit _Lot (s)_ Block (s) Section & 2 4 Twp. 51s Range 2 Property I.D. # 74080720006 _5e COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SERVICES /CURRENT PLANNING 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE - NAPLES, FL 34104 PHONE (941) 403- 24001FAX (941) 643 -6968 PAGE 1 OF 8 16J1 Address of Subject Property: See legal description on warranty deed Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: A -ST Vacant lot - Proposed dock and house in near future. Adjacent Zoning & Land use: Zoning Land use Length of existing dock facility N A -S Vacant E - _Inland Waterway S _A-S T Vacant W Gulf of Mexico A site plan to scale showing dimensions and location of existing and proposed dock structures, as well as a cross section showing the facility in relation to mean high/low water and shoreline (bank, seawall or rip -rap revetment) should be submitted with this application. Site Information: Width of waterway: -LO —0 ft.; measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ® other (specify) Laser rangefinder Total property water frontage: 15 7 ft. Setbacks: provided 6 7 & 4 0 ft. required __15 5 ft. Total protrusion of proposed facility into water 6 5 ft. Number and length of vessels to use facility: 1. 32 ft., 2. 18 ft., 3 ft List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: Most of the docks on Keewavdin Island extend out 40-80 ft from the shoreline The proposed dock extends out 43 ft and an additional 20 ft for the mooring piles We are reguesting an additional 2 ft for insurance during the spot survey, PAGE 2 OF 8 16J1 The following criteria, (pursuant to Section 2.6.21.3 of the Land Development Code) shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Collier County Planning Commission, and by the Planning Commission in its decision to approve or deny a particular. Dock Extension request. Please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Attach additional pages if necessary. 1. What are the number of dock facilities or slips to be located on the subject property in relation to the length of waterfront property available (include required setbacks) for the location of the proposed dock facilities? There are two slips on the proposed dock. A boatlift is proposed for the inside slip The waterfronta e is 157 if and the proposed setbacks are 67 & 40 ft The required setbacks are 15 ft. for this lot. 2. Is there sufficient water depth to allow for safe mooring of the vessel without the use of a dock facility extension request? No. The water is shallow near the shore and the requested extension is needed to moor the vessels during normal low UdaLa. See the attached cross-section for water depths 3. Will the proposed dock facility and moored vessel(s) in combination have an adverse impact to navigation within an adjacent navigable channel? No. This is a very wide waterway (600 ft.) with most of waterway naviaahle, except near the shorelines Existing mks -in the area extend out as far or farther than the one proposed with no impact to navigation. 4. Does the proposed dock design aad moored vessel protrude greater than 25 percent of the width of the navigable canal or greater than 20 feet for boathouses, and is a minimum of 50 percent of the platted canal width between dock structures/moored vessel(s) on the opposite side of the canal maintained in order to ensure reasonable waterway width for navigability? The proposed dock and mooring piles protrudes a total of 65 ft. into the waterway The waterway is 600 ft wide No structures on opposite side of waterway, More than 50% APPLICATION FOR rxrrr FACILEry E MNSION PETITION 5M of waterway is left open. PAGE 3 OF 8 16J1 5. Are there special conditions related to the subject property or waterway which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the subject dock? _Yes. This is a barrier island with shallow water near the shoreline. Keewavdin Island is located in the Aquatic Preserve where dredging is discouraged when docks can be extended out into deeper water without impact to navigation. 6. Is the proposed dock of minimal dimensions necessary in order to adequately secure the moored vessel while providing reasonable access to the boat for routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area? Yes. The proposed dock is of minimal dimensions because the State only permits a total of 500 sa ft of deck area. The terminal platform is limited to 160 sq. ft. and the walkway is limited to 4 ft. wide. 7. Is the proposed structure of minimal dimensions to minimize the impact of the view of the waterway by surrounding property owners? Yes, but this is not a factor with docks on Keewavdin _Island. All docks protrude out about the same distance and homes built on these lots are generally much farther inland without a view of the waterway. 8. Is the moored vessel in excess of fifty (50) percent of the length of the waterfrontage such that the addition of a dock structure will increase the impact on or negatively impact the view of the waterway by surrounding property owners? ► relm CREW *1 • r am - - • • 1 • the property is 150 ft. wide. View is not an issue with the property owners on Keewavdin Island as stated in NO. 7. PAGE 4 OF 8 16J1 9. Will the proposed location and design of the dock /vessel combination be such that it may infringe upon the use of neighboring properties, including any existing dock structures? No. At the present, the lots on both sides of the applicant are vacant but the dock is designed with large setbacks to prevent any access problems in the future when docks are built. 10. Regarding existing benthic organisms in the vicinity of the proposed extension: (a) Are seagrasses located within 200 feet of the proposed dock? No. (b) Is the proposed dock is subject to the manatee protection requirements of this code (Sec. 2.6.22)? No. In addition to the above, the following criteria shall apply to Boathouses. Please indicate whether or not the following listed criteria have been met: Criteria Minimum side setback requirement Maximum protrusion into waterway Standard 15 feet 25 percent of canal width or 20 feet, whichever is less Complies YES❑ NO ❑ YES❑ NO ❑ PAGE 5 OF 8 16J1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET! REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED 1. Com leted Application 14 2. Com leted Owner/Agent Affidavit, Notarized . 1 3. Pre-application notes /minutes 14 4. Site Plan illustrating all of the following: 14 a . The lot and dimensions where proposed docking facility is to be located. b. All yard setbacks c . Required setbacks for the dock facility d. The total number and configuration of the proposed facilities, etc. (include all dimensions to scale). e . The water depth where the proposed dock facility is to be located and the distance to the navigable channel. (Water depth at mean low tide should be shown at approximately every five (5) feet of length for the total length of the proposed facility. f . Illustrate the land contour of the property on which the dock facility is proposed g. The dock facility should be illustrated from an aerial view, as well as side view. 5. Application Fee and Data Conversion Fee. Check shall be made payable to Collier County Board of Commissioners As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. Agent/Ap 5 -13-01 Date PAGE 7 OF 8 16J1 • r. AFFIDA VIT Weil, �/� r' J t v e being first duly sworn, depose and say that we /, am/are the ners of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, i►rcluding the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our k►aowledge and belief. WeII understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted As property owner We /I further authorize Miles L. Scofield as ourimy representative in any matters regarding this Petition. 0111re of Property Owner 1, M`41,4ej Typed or Printed Name of Owner Signature of Property Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instruments rwas aciarowledged before me this clay of V J r. by H 5 M c � � who is personally Inrown [o me or has produced �L DL— as identification. State of Florida +•►.+L' , Denise Franco County of Collier *4g *My Commission CC676308 Expires September 0 t, 2001 Gt/I/1 (Signature of Notary Public - State of lorida) ✓ Gl.v� (' (Print, T)pe, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) PAGE 8 OF 8 to act rq.. 1 •1 ' g, � l? Q .. 1 co ► A. C A a 1 oa a o p eek . • �a.'9 N N .W C N W ♦ — • A O. a N / w jS In = v / 0 ee- Y .� 6 N —J . \ o w ♦ e s W 330 ° 11 n � \ : v0 � . c l / w'�•' w N °� �„.,llulll�urf,N ka; �000 •� N •� \ = � 11 1111` I Il l�r 1 i C �! ca / o CD Z O• \ NAG £Tip /I i ab 0 lf0 D 0 w Q 07 /Cb ur 90h� O N N /tv, P. Ep'f 9 \ irA ��O ��/ / /ii // //I I�IIII,1111111\ \ ``\ m �• S( }, J 7 P , / y • i5 0 '33 -60 4 /ih,/ 7 N11\I — p 18 /llrllllll' fill if II 111111 11111111 \` 1 N O a 50 a w 4b Il s jo � Y a f O OD T y I A* p L <O O N �• � \\ A i En A W N A> 3 0; l0 G ]((GJ••/,,. to C!1 f 0% S1 re ay p� 250 _ w B U ° n` 4c, I a0 8i V W D -4 v i A N y ; A N (J >� D O C � Oil. / j Cb >4 D13 4�ya�A+ •� �_s M• W '' ,• W Jty a m a v W`8�+•,N•,�! � V� Oyy� M-1 J• ab J A W ' ....................... .. •' D r�a dot 1 1.• p N ° o m m it.';ar'1„�,y'b %= ; i 2cTiwai t�jjOU 6 • �D N o / W V N •.�.._ +� / _ 7 w ... t0 N Q O •.� i �m >✓3 99N • 1 °IIt A A — O' IN ZW :T ca N 2 ^� AN Q -. n0 0 .mow Y > � A o' OMNI"= ww--:IF ; 3FI-W.919i • S k • a • A Fce% W &A 1.� dr- qc-iwA,M�P-w 0 P. 19 b 16J1 MV) �Q� TWO off) = W Y WAS =8 aWOO 59Z 0 cr o w � � ul F N� � 62 �•• t� N12�}.2g•W'� w t 52.34 MARCO BOULEVARD 60� ROAD ROW (NOT OPEN) I � 1 W' .� 5 51 .'', ��w 1 rn�I I ■ _.deS' S9A9 29-11 m� al @7 viv,�wtl O � � JL4 O b LO 4 b F cn �o w c V O 0 z J z O N W N O CL � as >> CL a zF U N a� W V) C3 Z �Z o �- 0 z �jZ 77O N �� N m W F l W � N I j N J 1 W 2 � MARCO BOULEVARD 60� ROAD ROW (NOT OPEN) I � 1 W' .� 5 51 .'', ��w 1 rn�I I ■ _.deS' S9A9 29-11 m� al @7 viv,�wtl O � � JL4 O b LO 4 b F cn �o w c V O 0 z J z O N W N O CL � as >> CL a zF U N a� W V) C3 Z �Z o �- 0 z 16J1 RIPARIAN LINE PROPERTY LINE & MEAN HIGH WATER LINE ELEV. 1.57' NGVD '29 AS LOCATED 03/14/01 40 43 1 20' - HANDRAIL TO PREVENT MOORINGI 1 4' HANDRAIL TOJj PREVENT MOORING [A] M192mm 16 I I Cl 0 MPA Scofield Marine Consulting 3684 Exchange Ave. Suite B Naples, Fl. 33942 Phone: (941) 643 -1900 Fax: (941) 843 -8832 HENRY J. Mc VI CKER SOUTH 160' OF LOTS 3 & 4 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA z52 ' * 0 z r^ D oz 0� N o m D m m ozm m N O 5pa m v m cli m r- 0 z y� m ma z c N D z � 0 a rn m r. to a o n U l J � Ui ,-. o 'O V // rn � , V J Co c ►-a M I rn U O N m s �'J "- o C) O 0 CNJt O z z mo V D O D 0 0 O 2 -P r cn z m v 01 b r. to a o n � Ui ,-. E03 AO rn � CA n�o Co c ►-a M rn '1 !�yi � • O N s �'J "- W m O h�0�64 o � C-) s o tti t4 lip N CA N Nw04 r Pi of � % O O 0 M. 6310 w 0 16J1 APPX. MHW LINE & PROPERTY LINE D z 0 D ON O ox O -P 1 w N CD m O m J m r N 0 � o m 0 Ul O x- c- w T� N F:O m O z 1611 NDA ITEM 7 -C CO�r X 17 PF MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DATE: AUGUST 27, 2001 RE: PETITION NO: PUDZ- 2001 -AR -620, MEDITERRA PUD AGENT /APPLICANT: Agent: Mrs. Anita L. Jenkins WilsonMiller, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: Owner: Long Bay Partners, L.L.C. 3461 Bonita Bay Blvd., Suite 104 Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 The subject property is located on the north side of the Future east /west Livingston Boulevard right -of -way and approximately one half mile west of I -75 in Sections 11 & 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Planning Commission consider a proposed rezone of the subject site from "A" Agriculture, "A -ST" and PUD to Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the purpose of adding 213.7 -acres to the Mediterra PUD and to permit a 20,000 square foot Village Center. PURPOSE /DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner proposes to rezone 213.7 -acres from Agricultural to PUD for the purpose of incorporating the land into the Mediterra PUD. The additional land will increase the overall acreage of the PUD from 954 -acres to 1,168 -acres for that portion of the project within Collier County. This currently approved PUD project also contains approximately 491 acres in Lee County. Since no additional dwelling units are proposed with this petition, the maximum density will be reduced to 0.64 units per acre. In addition, this petition allows for a 20,000 square foot Village Center to be located on the proposed added lands. The Village Center permits small -scale retail uses that primarily serve the residents of Mediterra. 16J1 ;1' -di The PUD was approved for a maximum of 750 dwelling units in Collier County and 950 units overall. The Master Plan remains essentially the same except for the 213.7 -acres proposed to be added at the southeast corner of the approved PUD. The intent for the consolidated area is to allow for some of the approved uses including residential units, village retail uses, lakes and preserve areas to be to be relocated from the currently approved boundaries and thereby providing for a lower density development. Lastly, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council has reviewed a binding letter amendment and they have determined that the proposed changes do not create regional impacts and that the Mediterra Development, including the proposed expansion areas, is not a Development of Regional Impact. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Existing Conditions: The subject 213 -acre site that is to be added to the Mediterra PUD is currently undeveloped and is zoned Agricultural. Surrounding: North: Lee County and the undeveloped Ronto Livingston DRI is approved for 1,380 units at a density of 2.98 units per acre. East: Vacant agricultural land and the undeveloped Ronto Livingston PUD /DRI. South: Developed single- family residential zoned RSF -3 and vacant agricultural land. West: Developed industrial zoned land. 2 16J1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: This PUD has been distributed to the appropriate jurisdictional review entities specifically for review of the PUD for consistency with the current Growth Management Plan and land development regulations. Future Land Use Element: The subject PUD is designated Urban (Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub - district) on the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Map of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). This district permits a base density of 4 dwelling units per acre pursuant to the Density Rating System of the FLUE of the GMP. A consistency analysis with applicable elements of the GMP is as follows: The original 954 -acre development that lies within Collier County was approved in 1999 and permits 750 dwelling units, 36 holes of golf, ancillary recreational uses, and a Village Center. As previously noted, this petition will increase the overall land area to 1,168 -acres while maintaining the same number of dwelling units. As a result, the density will be reduced to 0.64 units per acre, which are 3.36 units per acre less than the base density of 4 units per acre the project is eligible to receive. As a result, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project is consistent with the Density Rating System of the GMP. In addition, the PUD permits a Village Center that allows for small -scale retail uses that are in accordance with the PUD Neighborhood Village Center Sub - district of the FLUE. It is also consistent with Section 2.2.20.3.14 of the Land Development Code, which limits the gross acreage of the neighborhood village retail center to 4.5 acres and a maximum floor area ratio of 0.25. Since the PUD limits the commercial floor area to 20,000 square feet (below this limit), this criterion has been complied with. However, the Mediterra PUD document does not contain the specific deviations from the Neighborhood Village Center Sub - district. The Board of County Commissioners (BCC) should be aware that deviations exist and that they may approve these deviations pursuant to Section 2.2.20.3.14 of the Land Development Code. These deviations are as follows: (1) The petitioner is requesting deviations from the provision of providing a pedestrian walkway system throughout the PUD. (2) Section 4.5 ( "D" & "E ") of the PUD Document allows deviations from the location standards as provided for in the Village Center criteria of the LDC. (3) The PUD Document does not reference the phasing of the Village Center as required by the Neighborhood Village Center provision of the LDC that states that no commercial building construction in the Village Center shall be allowed until construction has commenced on at least 30 percent of the residential units. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the applicant's Binding Letter of Interpretation Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) and has the following comment. The existing PUD Zoning could generate 7,072 Average Vehicle Trip Ends at the proposed build -out in 2004. Since no additional dwelling units are proposed, the difference in site - generated trips of the proposed amendment versus the currently approved PUD zoning is insignificant. As a result, no roadway segments will be significantly or adversely impacted by this proposed amendment. Therefore, this petition is consistent with Policies 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. 3 16 JZ J Open Space /Conservation Element: The currently approved Mediterra PUD far exceeds the minimum thresholds required for open space and conservation preservation. The annexation of an additional 213 -acres will not reduce those levels. Sewer and Water: The subject property will become an integral part of the Mediterra PUD that will be connected to Collier County's sewer and water system. Because this petition doesn't allow for additional dwelling units, there are no additional demands to the sewer and water system over the amount that was previously approved. Other Applicable Elements: Staff review indicates that this petition has been designed to account for all the necessary relationships dictated by the GMP. Mitigation measures and stipulations have been developed to ensure consistency with the GMP during the permitting process. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Section 3.15 of the LDC, Adequate Public Facilities, at the earliest or the next to occur of a final local development order. Therefore, this petition is consistent with the goals and policies of the GMP. Staff has concluded that no level of service standards will be adversely affected by this amendment. Appropriate mitigation measures and stipulations will assure that the County's interests are maintained. Consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of other applicable elements of the GMP and level of service relationships are to be achieved by stipulations and/or development commitments made a part of the approval of this development order. HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT: Staff's analysis indicates that the petitioner's property is located outside an area of historical and archaeological probability as referenced on the official Collier County Probability Map. Therefore, no Cultural Survey and Assessment is required. EVALUATION ENVIRONMENTAL. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: The subject petition has been reviewed by the appropriate staff responsible for oversight related to the above referenced areas of critical concern. This includes a review by the Community Development Environmental and Engineering staff, and the Transportation Services Division. The petitioner has submitted an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the 213.7 -acres of land to be added to the PUD. This EIS indicates that the site contains 62.9 -acres of SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands. These consist of hydric pine flatwoods, pine cypress mix and melaleuca. The proposed project will preserve 24.2 acres while impacting 43.8 -acres or approximately 70 percent of the jurisdictional wetlands. The project related wetland impacts will be compensated for by reforestation, removal of exotics and hydraulic improvements. 4 16J1 In addition, the PUD allows for additional mitigation to be purchased from an approved mitigation bank such as the Panther Island Mitigation Bank. The Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) heard this item on June 6, 2001 and they recommended approval as submitted. The Transportation Services has also recommended approval. EVALUATION: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition and the criteria on which a favorable determination must be based. This evaluation is intended to provide an objective, comprehensive overview of the impact of the proposed land use change, be they positive or negative, culminating in a staff recommendation based on that overview. The listed criteria are specifically noted in Section 2.7.2.5 and Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Land Development Code thus requiring staff evaluation and comment, and shall be used as the basis for a recommendation of approval or denial by the Planning Commission to the BCC. Each of the potential impacts or considerations identified during the staff review are listed under each of the criterion noted and are categorized as either pro or con, whichever the case may be, in the opinion of staff. The review of each of the criterion is followed by a summary conclusion culminating in a determination of compliance, non - compliance, or compliance with mitigation. These evaluations are completed as separate documents and are attached to the staff report. Appropriate evaluation of petitions for rezoning should establish a factual basis for supportive action by appointed and elected decision - makers. The evaluation by professional staff should typically include an analysis of the petition's relationship to the community's future land use plan, and whether or not a rezoning action would be consistent with the Collier County GMP in all of its related elements (See Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B "). Other evaluation considerations should include an assessment of adequacy of transportation infrastructure, other infrastructure, and compatibility with adjacent land uses, a consideration usually dealt with as a facet of analyzing the relationship of the rezoning action to the long range plan for future land uses. In addition, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed similar rezone requests within this "Urban Residential" designated area where there is an opportunity to approve residential uses when deemed appropriate. Notwithstanding the above, staff in reviewing the determinants for adequate findings to support a rezoning action advise as follows: Relationship to Existing Land Uses - As shown in the photo below, the 213 -acre site will to be incorporated into the Mediterra PUD is located on the east side of Livingston Road. Furthermore, the adjacent Ronto Livingston PUD has been approved for 1,380 dwelling units and permits similar dwelling types. Clearly, the annexation of this additional 213 - acres and its inclusion in the Master Plan is preferable to its development independent from Mediterra where traffic circulation and design would be different and less compatible. Lastly, the proposed development regulations, landscaping, screening and buffering requirements contained in this PUD are consistent with the LDC. 5 16J1 ., View from Livingston Road Relationship to Future Land Uses - A discussion of this relationship, as it applies specifically to Collier County's legal basis for land use planning, refers to the relationship of the proposed zoning action to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The property is located within the Urban Residential Sub- district as depicted on the Future Land Use Map. Since this district permits residential uses with a base density of 4 -units per acre. The proposed rezone from Agriculture to the Mediterra PUD is consistent with the GMP. These uses are also compatible with the adjacent and nearby residential communities. Given the urban influence impacting this area, the proposed rezone to allow a commercial development similar to those uses approved in this area are consistent with requirements of the FLUE to the GMP. Traffic Circulation and Impact - Staff has identified the fact that the proposed project will not add additional dwelling units over the amount that was previously approved. Furthermore, this amendment allows the shifting of some of the approved Village Center uses to the added lands in order to serve the residents within the eastern side of the Mediterra PUD. The Village Center areas will provide goods and services for residents within the PUD. This is intended to reduce the need of residents to travel outside the development thereby reducing traffic on the local arterial road network. As a result, this petition will not have an adverse impact on county road network by virtue of the fact that vehicular site generated trips resulting from the rezone petition will not lower the level of service below adopted standards. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition Number: PUDA- 2001 -AR -620 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval. 6 I PREPARED BY: /,--L AFt,_ - - RAY BALOWS , PRINCIPAL PLANNER C PLANNING SECTION REVIEWED BY: ��_ 144 A-ge USAN MURRAY, AICP, MANAGE CURRE PLANNING SECTION THOMAS E. KUCK, P.E., ACTING DIRECTOR PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 8/2,7/o/ DATE DATE DATE APPROVED BY: %lL 4M4�j qhiloj ffiHN M. DUNNUCK, III, INTERIM ADMINISTRATOR DATE OMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS. Staff Report for September 20, 2001 CCPC meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: JOYCEANNA J. RAUTIO, CHAIRMAN RVB /rb/ STAFF REPORT /AR -620 ibJ1 � FINDINGS FOR PUD PUDZ -01 -AR -620 Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning Commission to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the following criteria: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Pro. (i) Intensifying land development patterns produces economics of scale relative to public utilities, facilities and services, which are currently available in this area. (ii) Development of land that has legal access, is adjacent to existing residential uses is particularly suitable for a mixed -use development that includes a golf course, a neighborhood commercial center and residential. Con: (i) Existing neighboring residents often perceive new development as an intensification near their existing neighborhood as contributing factors to inconveniencing traffic movements to and from their place of residence, increasing noise and pollution, and reducing property values. Finding: Jurisdictional reviews by County staff support the manner and pattern of development proposed for the subject property. Development conditions contained in the PUD document give assurance that all infrastructure will be developed and be consistent with County regulations. Any inadequacies that require supplementing the PUD document will be recommended to the Board of County Commissioners as conditions of approval by staff. Recommended mitigation measures will assure compliance with Level of Service relationships as prescribed by the Growth Management Plan. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. Finding: Documents submitted with the application provide evidence of unified control. The PUD document makes appropriate provisions for continuing operation and maintenance of common areas. Exhibit "A" 1 16J1 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Pro: (i) The development strategy for the subject property is entirely consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP. Con: None. Finding: The subject petition has been found consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP. A review of consistency relationships with elements of the GMP is as follows: The subject PUD proposes to allow residential uses at a density under one unit per acre, which is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Pro: The subject 213 -acre site has been designed to provide an architectural design and development standards that reflect the approved Mediterra PUD design character. In addition, landscaping has been provided to buffer the adjacent residential tracts. Con: None. Finding: The PUD Master Plan has been designed to optimize internal land use relationship through the use of various forms of open space separation. External relationships are automatically regulated by the Land Development Code to assure harmonious relationships between projects. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Finding: The amount of open space set aside by this project is consistent with the provisions of the Land Development Code. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Finding: Timing or sequence of development in light of concurrency requirements automatically triggers the mechanism for ensuring that further LOS degradation is not allowed or the LOS deficiency is corrected. 2 16J1 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Pro: This petition seeks to modify the existing residential zoning on the subject site that will allow for a more compatible project. Lastly, this project will not adversely impact any adopted level of service standard. Con: None. Summary Finding: Ability, as applied in this context, implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal system, potable water supplies, characteristics of the property relative to hazards, and capacity of roads, is supportive of conditions emanating from urban development. This assessment is described at length in the staff report adopted by the CCPC. Relative to this petition, development of the subject property is timely, because supporting infrastructure is available. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Finding: This finding essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The development standards in this PUD are similar to those standards. FINDINGS FOR PUD-0 I -AR-620/RVB/rb 3 16J1 REZONE FINDINGS PETITION PUDZ -01 -AR -620 Section 2.7.2.5. of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following, where applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives & policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Pro: i. The subject property is located within the Mixed Use Urban Residential Sub - District on the FLUE of the Growth Management Plan. ii. Development Orders deemed consistent with all applicable elements of the FLUE of the GMP should be considered a positive relationship. Con: None Summary Findings: The proposed development is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The density permitted within this PUD is consistent with the Density Rating System contained in the Growth Management Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern; Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. (A detailed study is contained in the staff report.) Summary Findings: The subject 213 -acre site will be incorporated into the Mediterra PUD to the west and is located outside the Traffic Congestion Boundary. The adjacent uses include residential to the north, west and east and agricultural to the south. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; Pro: The subject site is of sufficient size and is located within the Urban Residential Sub - district on the Future Land Use Map. Con: None. EXHIBIT `B" 1 16J1 Summary Findings: The parcel is of sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also consistent with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Pro: The district boundaries are logically drawn and they are consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Con: None. Summary Findings: The boundaries are logically drawn by virtue that the subject PUD provides an extension of the existing residential PUD to the west. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Pro: The proposed zoning change is appropriate based on the approved residential land uses to the east and west. Furthermore, the subject PUD has a positive relationship to the GMP. Con: None. Summary Findings: The proposed change in zoning is appropriate since it is consistent with the FLUE and Growth Management Plan. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Pro: (i) The proposed development standards (i.e. setbacks and landscaping) made a condition of approval will go a long way towards offsetting any potential adverse influences by Mediterra on the residential subdivision to the south. Con: (i) The location of the subject site could cause increased noise and traffic impacts on the nearby residences. However, due to the proposed landscape and buffer areas, along with the low- density areas, the proposed PUD should not adversely impact the adjacent properties. Summary Findings: The proposed PUD will not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood because the recommended development standards and other conditions for approval have been promulgated and designed to ensure the least amount of adverse impact on adjacent and nearby developments. Recommended mitigation actions should serve to ameliorate impact on the adjacent residential area. 2 16J1 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. Pro: (i) An action to rezone the property as requested is consistent with the Transportation Element. (See Staff Report) (ii) The property has legal access thereby providing access to Livingston Road, which connects to the arterial road network over which traffic from this development will draw and defuse traffic. Con: (i) As urban intensification increases, there is some loss of comfort and ease of travel to the motoring public. However, by law this degree of discomfort is regulated by concurrency requirements as adopted in the Growth Management Plan. (ii) In the short run construction traffic made necessary for development may be irritating to local residents. Summary Findings: Evaluation of this project took into account the requirement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP and was found consistent, a statement advising that this project when developed will not excessively increase traffic congestion. Additionally certain traffic management system improvements are required as a condition of approval (i.e. turn lanes, traffic signals, dedications, etc.). In the final analysis all rezone actions are subject to the Concurrency Management System. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; Pro: (i) The Land Development Code specifically addresses prerequisite development standards that are designed to reduce the risk of flooding on nearby properties. New development in and of itself is not supposed to increase flooding potential on adjacent property over and above what would occur without development. Con: (i) Urban intensification in the absence of commensurate improvement to inter - county drainage appurtenances may increase the risk of flooding in areas when the drainage outfall condition is inadequate. 3 16J1 Summary Findings: Every project approved in Collier County involving the utilization of land for some land use activity is scrutinized and required to mitigate all sub - surface drainage generated by developmental activities as a condition of approval. This project was reviewed for drainage relationships and design and construction plans are required to meet County standards as a condition of approval. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; Pro: The proposed PUD development conforms to the approved zoning on the adjacent property to the east. In addition, the maximum height for the structures as provided for in the approved Mediterra PUD is similar to the maximum height permitted within the nearby projects to the east. The overall development standards are compatible with the standards listed for the similar residential districts in the LDC, which are designed to protect the circulation of light and air to adjacent areas. Con: None. Summary Findings: All projects in Collier County are subject to the development standards that are unique to the zoning district in which it is located. These development standards and others apply generally and equally to all zoning districts (i.e. open space requirement, corridor management provisions, etc.) were designed to ensure that light penetration and circulation of air does not adversely affect adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; Pro: Typically urban intensification increases the value of contiguous underutilized land. Con: None. Summary Findings: This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property that can affect property values. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning, however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by market value. The mere fact that a property is given a new zoning designation may or may not affect value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. 4 16J1 Summary Findings: The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the zoning division of the LDC is that their sound application when combined with the administrative site development plan approval process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in a deterrence to improvement of adjacent property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings: The proposed PUD complies with the Growth Management Plan, which are public policy statements supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said plans. In light of this fact the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings: The subject property can be developed in accordance with the existing zoning, however to do so would deny this petitioner of the opportunity to maximize the development potential of the site as made possible by its consistency relationship with the Growth Management Plan. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; Pro: The project is designed in a manner that is compatible with surrounding and approved PUD property in size and scale. Con: Existing neighbors within the adjacent subdivision to the east may feel that the proposed change is out of scale with the neighborhood. However, no objections to this petition have been received at this time. Summary Findings: The subject PUD complies with the Growth Management Plan while the intensity of land uses is deemed acceptable for this site. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. 5 16J1 Summary Findings: There are many sites, which are zoned to accommodate the proposed development. This is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a rezoning decision. The determinants of zoning are consistency with all elements of the GMP, compatibility, adequacy of infrastructure and to some extent the timing of the action and all of the above criteria. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Pro: The subject property is undeveloped. Presently exotic vegetation has invaded the site, however the environmental impacts are minimal. Con: Development of the site may create a need for additional fill and site alteration for infrastructure improvements. Summary Findings: The extent of site alteration will be determined as a function of obtaining a Site Development Plan approval to execute the PUD's development strategy. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. Pro /Con: Evaluation not applicable. Summary Findings: A multi - disciplined team responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP has reviewed this petition and they have found it consistent with the GMP. The conditions of approval have been incorporated into the PUD document. Staff reviews for adequacy of public services and levels of service determined that required infrastructure meets with GMP established relationships. REZONE FINDINGS /01 -AR- 620 /RVB /rb R I. II. III. 16J1 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT MEETING OF JUNE 6, 2001 NAME OF PETITIONER/PROJECT: Petition No.: Petition Name: Applicant/Developer: Engineering Consultant: Environmental Consultant: LOCATION: Planned Unit Development No. PUDZ- 2001 -AR -620 Mediterra PUD Long Bay Partners, L.L.C. Wilson Miller, Inc. Wilson Miller, Inc. The subject property is located on the north side of future east/west Livingston Road, approximately one mile east of Interstate I -75 and two miles north of Immokalee Road, in Section 11 & 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The 213.71 acres to be added to the PUD are located immediately to the east of the existing PUD, on the east side of north /south Livingston Road. The existing PUD lies on the west side of north /south Livingston Road. DESCRIPTION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES: Surrounding properties include a mixture of developed and undeveloped parcels. ZONING DESCRIPTION N - Lee County Partially Developed PUD (Ronto Livingston) Undeveloped S- R.O.W. east/west Livingston Road Agricultural Undeveloped RSF -3 (Imperial Golf Estates) Developed E - R.O.W. north/south Livingston Road Agricultural Mostly Undeveloped Item V. EAC Meeting Page 2 of 11 IV. MAE PUD (Ronto Livingston) Industrial PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 16J1 Undeveloped Partially Developed The intent of this petition is rezone 213.7 -acres from "A" Agriculture and A/ST to the Mediterra PUD. The purpose is to allow a 20,000 square foot Village Center within the added Mediterra east property and to shift some of the approved residential dwelling units over a larger area. This additional land will increase the overall PUD size to 1,168 -acres while reducing the overall density to 0.56 units per acre. The Master Plan indicates that the main access points to this added property is from the Future Livingston Road Boulevard while the primary access to the Village Center will be from an internal project road. Lastly, water and sewer service are readily available to support development of the site. V. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element: The subject PUD is designated Urban Residential Sub - district on the Future Land Use Map and Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management (GMP). This designation permits residential land uses and the proposed Village Center is consistent with the provisions in the Future Land Use Element permitting PUD neighborhood village centers to serve the residents within the development. Based on staff review of the approved land uses on the adjacent and nearby properties, the proposed uses are consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the GMT. Conservation & Coastal Manaeement Element: Objective 2.2. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan states "All canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall meet all applicable federal, state, or local water quality standards. To accomplish that, policy 2.2.2 states "In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater runoff, stormwater systems should be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity, and quality of fresh water (discharge) to the estuarine system. This project is consistent with the objectives of policy 2.2.2 in that it attempts to mimic or enhance the quality and quantity of water leaving the site by utilizing EAC Meeting Page 3 of 11 lakes and interconnected wetlands to provide water quality retention and peak flow attenuation during storm events. With regards to native vegetation preservation and wetland issues, the following Objectives and Policies apply: Objective 6.2 states, "There shall be no unacceptable net loss of viable naturally functioning marine and fresh water wetlands, excluding transitional zone wetlands which are addressed in Objective 6.3 ". Policy 6.2.10 states, "Any development activity within a viable naturally functioning fresh -water wetland not part of a contiguous flow way shall be mitigated in accordance with current SFWMD mitigation rules. Mitigation may also include restoration of previously disturbed wetlands or acquisition for public preservation of similar habitat ". Objective 6.3 states, "A portion of the viable, naturally functioning transitional zone wetlands shall be preserved in any new non - agricultural development unless otherwise mitigated through the DEP and the COE permitting process and approved by the County ". Objective 6.4 states, " A portion of each viable, naturally functioning non - wetland native habitat shall be preserved or retained as appropriate ". Policy 6.4.6 states, "All new residential developments greater than 2.5 acres in the Coastal Area and greater than 20 acres in the Coastal Urban Area shall retain 25% of the viable naturally functioning native vegetation on site, including both the understory and the ground cover emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible. When several different native plant communities exist on site, the development plans will reasonably attempt to preserve examples of all of them if possible. Areas of landscaping and open space which are planted with native plant species shall be included in the 25% requirement considering both understory and groundcover. Where a project has included open space, recreational amenities, or preserved wetlands that meet or exceed the minimum open space criteria of Collier County, this policy shall not be construed to require a larger percentage of open space set aside to meet the 25% native vegetation policy. This policy shall not be interpreted to allow development in wetlands, should the wetlands alone constitute more than 25% of the site. Exceptions shall be granted for parcels that cannot reasonably accommodate both the native vegetation and the proposed activity ". This petition is consistent with staff's policy, as directed by the Board of County Commissioners, to allow for impacts to jurisdictional wetlands when State and Federal agency permits are issued. The petition is consistent with Objective 6.4 in EAC Meeting Page 4 of 11 16J1 that it provides for 25% on -site native vegetation preservation pursuant to Policy 6.4.6. VI. MAJOR ISSUES: Water Management: The proposed stormwater management system for Mediterra East will route runoff from the roads, roofs, and "green" spaces to a series of interconnected lakes to provide water quality retention and peak flow attenuation. These lakes are connected via pipes under Livingston Road N/S to the existing stormwater management lakes in the original Mediterra project. The petitioner has committed to incorporating natural drainage patterns into the surface water management system wherever possible. The project will be reviewed by the South Florida Water Management District, and once their requirements are met, the project will be permitted. Environmental: Site Description: The Mediterra east property is undeveloped with large areas altered from their natural state by past agricultural activities and construction of electrical power lines. Undisturbed vegetation associations are concentrated in the northern third of the site. Roughly 70% of the property is uplands. Of the upland areas, over 38% are comprised of pastures and agricultural fields while over 18% consist of cleared power line easements and rights -of -way (ROW) for north/south Livingston Road (under construction) and future east/west Livingston Road. The remaining uplands mainly include areas dominated by pine flatwoods and Melaleuca. Wetlands comprise roughly 30% of the site (based on SFWMD jurisdictional determination). Remaining native vegetation associations mainly consist of pine flatwoods and mixed pine and cypress forests. EAC Meeting Page 5 of 11 16J1 Pine Flatwoods - Graminoid Understory (FLUCFCS Code 416E2) According to the Collier County Soil Survey prepared by the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), five soil map units are present on the Mediterra east project site. These units include the following: (Unit 2) Holopaw fine sand, limestone substratum; (Unit 14) Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum; (Unit 17) Basinger fine sand; (Unit 25) Boca, Riviera, limestone substratum and Copeland fine sand, depressional; and (Unit 27) Holopaw fine sand. All these units are classified as hydric soil units by the MRCS. Wetlands: The Mediterra east project site contains 62.69 acres of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) jurisdictional wetlands. The major vegetation types within the wetlands on site include hydric pine flatwoods, pine /cypress mix and Melaleuca monoculture. Minor areas of cypress and willow also exist on the property. Existing seasonal high water (SHW) levels in representative portions of wetlands on site were determined using hydro - biological indicators and groundwater monitoring well data collected in 1999 and 2000. Hydro - biological indicators used to assess SHW included water stain lines, moss collars, and lichen lines. Historic SHW levels were estimated using biological indicators such as lichen lines and buttressing. Table 4 in Appendix B of the EIS contains topographic and hydrologic data for wetlands within the Mediterra east property. A comparison of the existing and historic SHW levels indicates that site wetland hydrology has been altered as a result of surrounding obstructions (roadways, berms, FPL easement, adjacent EAC Meeting Page 6 of 11 16J1 development, etc.) and ditches that have caused diversion of historic flow through the site. Water table data collected from site piezometers indicates that the current SHW levels are approximately 0.7 -1.1 feet lower than historic SHW levels. Additionally, the existing average wet season water table (WSWT) is approximately 2.0 -2.3 feet lower than the existing SHW. The reduced hydrology has allowed Melaleuca to invade the site. Melaleuca (FLUCFCS Code 424) The proposed Mediterra east expansion will impact approximately 70% (43.86 acres) of wetlands on site. Wetland loss will be compensated for by on -site mitigation activities. Wetland conservation areas on site will be enhanced by removal of exotic plants, reforestation with native species, and hydrologic improvements. Of the 24.20 acres to be placed in a conservation area, 18.45 acres represent existing wetlands to be preserved and enhanced while 0.93 acres represent wetlands to be created (restored) from present -day uplands (a dirt road). Approximately 4.82 acres of uplands will also be preserved in the conservation area, and will be enhanced through eradication of exotics. In the event proposed on -site mitigation is insufficient to compensate for wetland losses, additional credits will be purchased from an approved mitigation bank such as Panther Island Mitigation Bank. It is estimated that approximately 11.3 credits would be purchased to compensate for the on -site mitigation deficit. Lands within the Mediterra east expansion area were designed so the conservation area would connect with the off -site preserve in Tuscany Reserve, thus providing for a larger more functional preserve area. Preservation Requirements: EAC Meeting Page 7 of 11 16J1 Approximately 51 acres of the 214 -acre Mediterra east expansion area are vegetated with native vegetation. In calculating the percentage of native vegetation within a given FLUCFCS type which counts towards the native vegetation preservation requirement, any areas with 75% or greater cover of exotic plants were considered to be non - native and not counted towards this. Areas that had been completely cleared of former native vegetation (power line easements, roads, etc.) were similarly considered as having no native vegetation remaining. Many areas on the site have been disturbed in the past but still have remnants of the forested systems originally present. In these areas, the amount credited towards the native vegetation requirement was estimated based on the percent of native canopy remaining (Table 2, Page B -2 of the EIS). Fallow Agricultural Land ( FLUCFCS Code 216E1) with Woodland Pasture ( FLUCFCS Code 213133) in background. A total of approximately 24.20 acres of native vegetation are proposed for preservation within the Mediterra east expansion area. This exceeds the 25% (12.75 acres) required by the Land Development Code. Listed Species: Biological surveys of the Mediterra east property were performed during the period from November 1999 through November 2000 using field methodology that met Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) guidelines. The surveys were performed to document vegetative associations and to locate and document any listed plant or wildlife species that may occur on the project site. Results of the survey are provided in Appendix D in the EIS. This EAC Meeting Page 8 of 11 16J1 report encompasses the entire Mediterra expansion project which involves the addition of two parcels: Mediterra east, the 213.71 acre parcel that is the subject of this submittal; and Mediterra north, a 41.12 acre parcel located in Lee County. The report includes information regarding the Lee County property because a Binding Letter of Determination and an amendment to the Lee County Mediterra RPD are being submitted concurrently with this amendment to the Mediterra PUD. During the listed species survey, three active gopher tortoise burrows were observed on the Mediterra east property (Exhibit 1 in the EIS). It is estimated that two or three tortoises represent the population. Two of the burrows are in close proximity to each other and may be utilized by a single tortoise. All the burrows appear to have been constructed by adult tortoises. The habitat occupied by these tortoises is of low quality. Gopher tortoises located on the Mediterra east property will be relocated to the existing permanent gopher tortoise preserve which spans both Collier and Lee Counties within the existing Mediterra property. The location of the gopher tortoise preserve is shown in Figure 9 of Appendix C in the EIS. Vegetative communities in the gopher tortoise preserve include live oak, pine flatwoods with palmetto understory, and limited areas of improved pasture, scrubby flatwoods, and mixed pine and cypress. Tracts of a single American alligator were observed on the edge of wetland #49 in the Mediterra east property (Exhibit 1). Judging from the size of the tracts, the alligator is likely young and no more than 3 to 4 feet in length. It is unlikely the animal remains in the wetland since it is only inundated for a couple of weeks during the peak of the normal wet season and there is no prey base (no fish, few amphibians or reptiles). No other listed wildlife species were observed nor were signs of such animals detected on the Mediterra east property during the course of the listed species survey or during prior site inspections. No listed plant species were observed on the property. VII. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of Planned Unit Development No. PUDZ- 2001 -AR- 620 " Mediterra PUD" with the following stipulations: Water Management: 1. A SFWMD Surface Water Management System permit for this project must be obtained prior to any construction drawing approval. EAC Meeting Page 9 of 11 16J1 Environmental: No additional stipulations. EAC Meeting Page 10 of 11 .. � . . STAN CHRZANOWI, P.E. SENIOR ENGINEER STEPHEN LENBERGER ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST II REVIEWED BY: RA ND V. BELLOWS PRINCIPAL PLANNER SUSAN MURRAY, AICP V INTERIM CURRENT PLANNING MANAGER THOMAS E. KUCK, P.E. IN'T'ERIM PLANNING SERVICES DIRECTOR APPROVED BY: 16JI DATE S' 1 '-) c DATE S lE Lof DATE 6 / / 0 / DATE 4� �elQ/ DATE If EAC Meeting Page 11 of 11 JO M. DUNNUCK, III 16J1 15 1 2-3 � - DATE R Tm C OMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR SlJgdh/c: StaffReport 16J1 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: PUD REZONE PUDZ - 2001- AR_620 Mediterra PUD Petition No.: Prof. # 2001040010 ATE: 4/6/01 Commission District: ABOVE TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF 1. General Information: Name of Applicant(s) Long BU Partners, L.L.C. .eceived: ied: N?U W 3_ Applicant's Mailing Address 3461 Bonita Bav Blvd., Suite 104 City Bonita Springs State FL Zip 34134 Applicant's Telephone # (941) 495 -1000 Fax # (941) 498 -1193 Name of Agent Anita L. Jenkins ACIP Firm Wilson Miller, Inc. Agent's Mailing Address 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 City Naples State FL Zip 34105 -8507 Agent's Telephone # (941) 649 -4040 Fax # (941) 643 -5716 Name of Agent Neale Montgomery Firm Pavese, Garner, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison & Jensen L L P Agent's Mailing Address PO Drawer 1507 City Ft Myers State FL Zip 33902 Agent's Telephone # (941) 336 -6235 Fax # (941)332 -2243 COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING SERVICES /CURRENT PLANNING 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 PHONE (941) 403 -2400 / FAX (941) 643 -6968 3/W1-91557 V-. 01!- f�enlons U 11] 02934 -008 - I8 -PPUD -25314 16J1 2. Disclosure of Interest Information: a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary.) Name and Address Percentage of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address and Office Percentage of Stock see attached C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest 3/5,01 91557Ver: 01! -NJ klnc U /43 02934-008-0 1 8 -PPUD -25314 16J1 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Date of Contract: Name and Address Percentage of Ownership f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired ® leased ❑ Term of lease yrs. /mos. If Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing date h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 3. Detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre- application meeting. 3r5,01 -91557 Ve 0 H44 nk- G 113 16J1 NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section: Township: Lot: Block: Subdivision: _ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. #: Metes & Bounds Description: Range: Please see attached Description of Mediterra Expansion East. 4. Size of property: ft. x ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres 214± 5. Address /general location of subject property: Northeast corner of Livingston Road N/S and Livingston Road E/W 6. Adjacent zoning and land use: Zoning Land Use N Ronto Livingston PUD Residential S Agriculture vacant E Ronto Livingston PUD Residential W Mediterra PUD Residential Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page). Section: Township: Range: Lot: Block: _ Plat Book: Page #: Metes & Bounds Description: 3/5 01 -91557 V— 01!- A4enwm U 143 02934 -008- 018.PPUD -25314 Subdivision: Property I.D. #: 16J1 7. Rezone Request: This application is requesting a rezone from the Agricultural "A" Mmk -A- -, 1 zoning district(s) to the PUD zoning district(s). Present use of the property: The property is currently vacant. Proposed use (or range of uses) of the property: Residential and village center uses. 8. Evaluation Criteria: Pursuant to Section 2.7.2.5 AND Section 2.7.3.2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below. Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. 3/5,01 -91 557 Ver: 01144mkl U#43 02934-008-01 B -PPUD -25314 16J1 9. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 10 315/01 -9 1 5 57 V- 01 !44-k- U#13 02934 -008- 018 -PPUD -25314 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: hearing been held on this property within the last year? hearing? To your knowledge, has a public If so, what was the nature of that 16J1 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR STANDARD REZONE REQUEST 1. Name of Applicant: Long Bay Partners, L.L.C. 2. Mailing Address: 3461 Bonita Bay Blvd., Suite 104 City Bonita Springs State FL Zip 34134 3. Address of Subject Property (if available): Northeast corner of Livingston Road N/S and Livingston Road E/W 4. Legal Description: Section: 12 Township: 48S Range: 25E Lot: Block: Plat Book: Page #: Metes & Bounds Description: Subdivision: Property I.D. #: See attached Exhibit "B" 5. Type of sewage disposal to be provided (check applicable system): a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name d. Package Treatment Plant El (GPD capacity) e. Septic System 6. Type of water service to be provided: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System C. Franchised Utility System Provide Name d. Private System (Well) 7. Total population to be served: approximately 600 people 8. Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water - Peak 328,421 GPD B. Sewer-Peak 285,210 GPD 3/5101 -91557 V¢ 01! -Ner*m G ♦73 02934-006 -01 B -PPUD -25314 Average Daily 91,228 GPD Average Daily _ 71,303 GPD 16J1 9. If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: June 2002 10. Narrative Statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of effluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Not applicable. 11. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Please refer to Section 7.5 of the Mediterra PUD document. 12. Statement of availability capacity from other providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre - application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. Not applicable. 3!5,01-91557 Ve 01! -AJe ki U #13 02934 - 008018 -PPUD -25314 16J1 PUD REZONE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST This completed checklist is to be submitted with application packet! Requirements # of Copies Required Not Required 1. Completed Application 15 x 2. Copy of Deed(s) and list identifying Owner(s) and all Partners if a Corporation 1 x 3. Completed Owner /Agent Affidavit, Notarized 1 x 4. Pre - application notes /minutes 15 x 5. Conceptual Site Plans 15 x 6. Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 4 x 7. Aerial Photograph (with habitat areas identified) 4 x 8. Completed Utility Provisions Statement (with required attachments and sketches) 4 x 9. Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) 4 x 10. Historical & Archaeological Survey or Waiver Application 4 x 11. Copies of State and/or Federal Permits 4 x 12. Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s) 4 x 13. Application Fee, Check shall be made payable to Collier County Board of Commissioners -- x 14. Other Requirements - As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. A nt/Applicant Sig ture 3/5,01 -91557 Vv 01144- - asu 02934-008-0 1 B-PPUD-25314 Date AFFIDAVIT 1, David H. Graham , being first duly sworn, depose and say that Long Bay Partners LLC is the owner of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner, I further authorize Neale Montgomery and Wilson Miller, Inc. to act as my representative in any matters regarding this Petition. Long Bay Partners LLC A Florida Limited Liability Company It's Managing Member By. Bonita Bay Properties, Inc. Signature of Property Owner David H. Graham Vice President Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this A , 2001, by �Q,y�t d- f i rGtitCL who hm prodomrd State of Florida County of �- e e- �,►ns Thuyvi D Gates * k My commWalon CC960445 y+ry irk Expires August 13,20N V e' -I- is day of Fe b personally known to me -er- es...id #ic-�- (Signature of Notary Public - State of Florida) Thuyvi Gates (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) PIN: 0 34-041-001 FIGURE 1 LOCATION MAP Wilsoomiller Feb 01, 2001 — 22:09:14 QJ0NESjX: \Env \2934 \H0J1135 \02— HQJ,dwq 16J1 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST FORM FOR: Bonita Bay Properties, Inc. Managing Member of Long Bay Partners, LLC A Florida Limited Liability Company fDU0 t I -g �JO 0 0 1 [� Co O (')! 0 0 CASE NO. 1. If the property is owned in fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. N/A 2. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officer and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Marital Trust for the Benefit of 48% Lois Shakarian Blackburn under the Will of David B. Shakarian %Edward G..Beimfohr 99 Park Avenue New York, New York 10015 Linda S. Lucas, Daughter 26% 13141 Ponderosa Way Fort Myers, Florida 33907 Louise S. Ukleja, Daughter 26% 6468 Bixby Hill Road Long Beach, CA 90815 David Lucas, Chairman 0% 13141 Ponderosa Way Fort Myers, Florida 33907 Dennis E. Gilkey, President, CEO 0% 27850 Riverwalk Way Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Edmund W. Rodgers, Jr., Vice President 0% General Manager of Bonita Bay 3330 Oak Hammock Court Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 David H. Graham, Vice President 0% Planning and Development 14780 Caleb Drive Fort Myers, Florida 33908 Harvey R. Schestag, Vice President 0% Finance 3310 Oak Hammock Court Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Gary Sandor, Sr. Vice President 0% Sales & Marketing 3381 Oak Hammock Court. Bonita Springs, FL 34134 John Gleeson, Vice President/ 0% General Manager of The Brooks 27240 Ridge Lake Court Bonita Springs, FL 34133 Ms. Susan Watts, Vice President/ 0% General Manager of Mediterra 3981 Lakemont Drive Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Ms. Sabra Spaugh, Vice President 0% Human Resources 3451 Bonita Bay Blvd, Suite 202 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Mr Jim McGowan, Vice President 0% Business Development 3451 Bonita Bay Blvd., Suite 202 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Mr. Leonard B. Jaffe, Vice President 0% Sales 8751 Estero Blvd., #502 Ft. Myers Beach, FL 33931 16J1 A" 3. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with percentage of interest. N/A 4. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL PARTNERSHIP OR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the names of the general and limited partners. N/A 5. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, whether contingent on this application or not, and whether a Corporation, Trustee, or Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. N/A 6. If any contingency clause or contract terms involved additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if corporation, partnership, or trust. N/A For any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase subsequent to the date of the application, but prior to the date of final public hearing, a supplemental disclosure of interest shall be filed. 2 16J1 The above is a full disclosure of all parties of interest in this application, to the best of my knowledge and belief. Bonita Bay Properties, Inc. Managing ber o ong B Partners, LLC Signature : plicant David H. Graham Vice President Printed or typed name of applicant STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEE 010 �! The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisO(Oday of 4ruar 2001, by David H. Graham who is personally known to me and did not take an oath. " Signature of Notary Public Thuyvi Gates rhuyA D G9tes atvp pR1Y'�us113, 2004 Thuyvi D Gales 4 * * Nly Commission CC960445 V, ,y Ezplres Aupus113, 2004 irilsdaffiller 16J1 New Directions In Planning, Design & Engineering Description of Mediterra Expansion East being a part of Section 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida All that part of Section 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Section 12; thence along the south line of said Section 12, South 88 °40'22" West 2657.64 feet to the south % comer of said Section 12; thence leaving the south line of said Section 12 along the north -south '/ line of said Section 12, North 00 051'30" West 1315.48 feet; thence continue along said line North 00 °51'12" West 1316.19 feet to the center of said Section 12; thence along the east - west' /4 line, North 88 051'44" East 1160.07 feet; thence leaving said east - west'/ line and along the west line of that land described in O.R. Book 2641, page 3405, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, North 00 053'36" West 657.34 feet to a point of the south line of the North %2 of the SW' /4 of the NE' /4 of said Section 12; thence along said south line, North 88 054'36" East 165.65 feet to a point on the west line of that land as described in O.R. Book 1439, page 1770, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said west line North 00054'01" West 30.03 feet to a point on the south line of that land as described in O.R. Book 1952, page 284, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said south line, South 88 °54'36" West 1325.19 feet to the north -south '/ line of said Section 12; thence along said north -south '/ 1ine, North 00 050'59" West 628.30 feet to the northwest corner of that land as described in O.R. Book 1952, page 284, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along the north line of said land, North 88 °55'21" East 1324.63 feet to the northwest corner of that land as described in O.R. Book 1439, page 1770, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line, North 88 °55'21" East 1059.38 feet to a point that is 265 feet west of as measured at right angles to the east line of said Section 12; thence along said line South 00 057'34" East 657.27 feet; thence continue along said line South 00 058'26" East 656.84 feet to the east - west' /4 line of said Section 12; thence along said line North 88 051'44" East 264.89 feet to the east'/ corner of said Section 12; thence along the east line of said Section 12, South 00059'11" East 2622.86 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described Containing 213.71 acres more or less Certificate of authorization #LB -43. John Inc. gi ers and Land Surveyors Boutwell, P.S.M. #3934 Date JAa-. 19, &0 ) Ref. 4L -1530 Not valid unless embossed with the Professional's seal. Naples Fort Myers Sarasota Bradenton Tampa 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 -8507 941- 649 -4040 941 - 643 -5716 1/19/DI-99692 Ve 01!- DRAMOS www.wilson.77iller.com 02934000 -028 -0 WilsonMil/er,lnc. — FL Lic./ LC- C000170 16J1 ORDINANCE NO. 01- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 851112; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A" RURAL AGRICULTURAL, "A -ST" AGRICULTURE WITH SPECIAL TREATMENT AND "PUD" TO PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS THE MEDITERRA PUD, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE FUTURE LIVINGSTON ROAD BOULEVARD AND APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE WEST OF 1 -75, IN SECTIONS 11 AND 12, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 1168+ ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2000 -36; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Anita L. Jenkins, AICP of WilsonMiller, Inc., representing Long Bay Partners, L.L.C., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Sections 11 and 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "A" Rural Agricultural, "A -ST" Agriculture with Special Treatment and "PUD" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Mediterra PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 851112, as described in Ordinance Number 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 2000 -36, adopted on May 23, 2000 by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. -1- PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency Marjorie M. Student Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: -2- JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN 16J1 MEDITERRA A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Approximately 1168± Acres Sections 11 and 12 Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Long Bay Partners, LLC 3451 Bonita Bay Boulevard, Suite 202 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 .. . WilsonMiller, Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 1: 16J1 DATE FILED 2/17/99 DATE APPROVED BY CCPC 5/20/00 DATE APPROVED BY BCC 6/8/99 ORDINANCE NUMBER 99 -41 DATE AMENDMENT FILED 2/18/00 DATE APPROVED BY CCPC 5/4/00 DATE APPROVED BY BCC 5/23/00 ORDINANCE NUMBER 2000 -36 DATE AMENDMENT FILED 3/5/01 DATE REVISED BY COLLIER COUNTY 8/29/01 DATE APPROVED BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER 8/5/2001- 52048 Ver 10& AJerkkw CAW 02934.007 -001- ESSM- 22959 16JI TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE SECTION I GENERAL DESCRIPTION SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SECTION III RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SECTION IV VILLAGE CENTER SECTION V RECREATION and OPEN SPACE DISTRICT SECTION VI PRESERVE DISTRICT SECTION VII GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS SECTION VIII CROSS JURISDICTIONAL PROVISIONS EXHIBIT A MEDITERRA MASTER PLAN (Collier County) (WilsonMiller File No. D- 2934 -54) 4/25/2001 -52046 Ver. 10A- AJenklns :AM 3 02934 - 0074001- ESBM- 22959 11 PAGE 1 -1 2 -1 3 -1 4-1 5 -1 6 -1 7 -1 m- 16J1 ,_3 thence run South 88 °54'42" West along the north line of the southeast '/4 of the northeast '/4 of said Section 11, for a distance of 1325.63 feet to the northwest corner of the southeast' /4 of the northeast' /4 of said Section 11; thence run South 00 °45'23" East along the west line of the southeast '/4 of the northeast %4 of said Section 11, for a distance of 1320.39 feet to the southwest corner of the southeast '/4 of the northeast '/4 of said Section 11; thence run South 0 °45'04" East along the west line of the northeast '/4 of the southeast '/a of said Section 11, for a distance of 1321.73 feet to the southwest comer of the northeast '/4 of the southeast' /4 of said Section 11; thence run South 88 °46'37" West along the north line of the southwest '/4 of the southeast '/4 of said Section 11, for a distance of 1325.33 feet to the northwest corner of the southwest' /4 of the southeast i/4 of said Section 11; thence run South 00 °45'39" East along the west line of the southwest' /4 of the southeast '/4 of said Section 11, for a distance of 1323.80 feet to the southwest corner of the southeast '/4 of said Section 11; thence run North 88 °41' 15" East along the south line of the southeast' /4 of said Section 11, for a distance of 2650.25 feet to the northwest corner of Section 13, Township 48 South, Range 25 East; thence run South 00 °43'28" East along the west line of the northwest' /4 of said Section 13, for a distance of 675.60 feet to the southwest corner of the northwest '/4 of the northwest '/4 of the northwest '/4 of said Section 13; thence run North 88 °38' 13" East along the south line of the northwest' /4 of the northwest %4 of the northwest '/4 of said Section 13, for a distance of 664.12 feet to the southeast corner of the northwest '/4 of the northwest' /4 of the northwest' /4 of said Section 13; thence run North 00 °41'49" West along the east line of the northwest '/4 of the northwest '/4 of the northwest '/4 of said Section 13, for a distance of 675.07 feet to the northeast corner of the northwest '/4 of the northwest '/4 of the northwest '/4 of said Section 13; thence run North 88 °41'00" East along the south line of the southwest' /4 of Section 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, for a distance of 1993.31 feet to the Point of Beginning. Less and excepting therefrom the Northwest '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of the Northwest '/4 of said Section 13. containing 472 acres more or less. and; The Northeast' /4 of the Northeast' /4 of Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, O.R. Book 2211, page 606 containing 40 acres more or less. and; The North %2 of the North '/2 of the Southwest '/4 of the Southwest '/4 of Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida containing 10 acres more or less. and; 4125/2001- 52046 Ver. 10A- AJenkine CA"3 02934 -007 -001- ESBM. 22950 16J1 , -< The South % of the North %2 of the Southwest 1/a of the Southwest '/4 of Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida containing 10 acres more or less. and; The North %2 of the South '/z of the Southwest '/4 of the Southwest '/4 of Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida containing 10 acres more or less. and; The North %2 of the Southeast '/a of the Northeast '/4 of the Northwest '/a of Section 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, containing 5.0 acres more or less. and; The South '/2 of the Southeast '/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, containing 5.0 acres more or less. and; All that part of Section 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast comer of said Section 12; thence along the south line of said Section 12, South 88 °40'22" West 2657.64 feet to the south '/4 corner of said Section 12; thence leaving the south line of said Section 12 along the north -south '/4 line of said Section 12, North 00 °51'30" West 1315.48 feet; thence continue along said line North 00 °51' 12" West 1316.19 feet to the center of said Section 12 and a point hereinafter referred to as Point "A "; thence along the east-west V4 line, North 88 °51'44" East 1160.07 feet; thence leaving said east- west' /4 line and along the west line of that land described in O.R. Book 2641, page 3405, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, North 00 °53'36" West 657.34 feet to a point of the south line of the North %2 of the SW '/a of the NE 1/4 of said Section 12; thence along said south line, North 88 °54'36" East 165.65 feet to a point on the west line of that land as described in O.R. Book 1439, page 1770, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said west line North 00 °54'01" West 30.03 feet to a point on the south line of that land as described in O.R. Book 1952, page 284, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said south line, South 88 °54'36" West 1325.19 feet to the north - south' /4 line of said Section 12; thence along said north -south 1/4 line, North 00 °50'59" West 628.30 feet to the northwest corner of that land as described in O.R. Book 1952, page 284, Public Records of Collier County, Florida and a point hereinafter referred to as Point `B "; 412512001• 52040 Ver. 10A. AJenkins CAM/9 02934- 007 -001• ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,.; thence along the north line of said land, North 88 055'21" East 1324.63 feet to the northwest corner of that land as described in O.R. Book 1439, page 1770, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line, North 88 055'21" East 1059.38 feet to a point that is 265 feet west of as measured at right angles to the east line of said Section 12; thence along said line South 00 °57'34" East 657.27 feet; thence continue along said line South 00 °58'26" East 656.84 feet to the east - west' /4 line of said Section 12; thence along said line North 88 °51'44" East 264.89 feet to the east '/4 corner of said Section 12; thence along the east line of said Section 12, South 00'59'11" East 2622.86 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein described Containing 213.71 acres more or less 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently under the equitable ownership of, or contract with LBP, or their assigns, whose address is 3451 Bonita Bay Boulevard, Suite 202, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. Mediterra is an in -fill project to be developed on 1696 acres located west of I -75 in north Collier County and south Lee County. Approximately 1168 ± acres of the project are in Collier County and the remaining acres are in Lee County. The PUD jurisdiction applies only to the property located in Collier County. B. The Collier County project site is located in Sections 11 and 12, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and is generally bordered on the west by Industrial and Residential zoned property and Old US 41; on the north by Lee County Agricultural zoned property; on the east by Agricultural zoned property; and on the south, by RSF -3 (Imperial Golf Estates) zoned property and Agricultural zoned property. The location of the site is shown on Exhibit "A ". C. The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of PUD application is Agricultural and Agricultural with ST overlay and PUD. D. Elevations within the site vary from approximately 11 to 14 feet -NGVD. The Project is located outside the 100 -year floodplain. Specifically, the Project is located within Zone X of the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (panel numbers 120067 0185D, 0191D, and 0195D, dated June 3, 1986). E. According to the Collier County Soil Survey prepared by NRCS, 14 soil units are present on the project site. These units, all of which are common to Collier County 4125/2001- 52046 Ver. 10A. AJenkins CA"3 02934 - 007 -001- ESOM- 22959 16J1 1 -6 and southwest Florida include the following: Malabar fine sand; Riviera - limestone substratum/Copeland fine sand; Immokalee fine sand; Hallandale fine sand; Pineda fine sand- limestone substratum; Basinger fine sand; Riviera fine sand - limestone substratum; Boca fine sand; Boca/Riviera- limestone substratum/Copeland fine sand, depressional; Holopaw fine sand; Urban land- HolopawBasinger complex; Satellite fine sand; Urban land- Satellite complex; and Hallandale/Boca fine sand. Vegetation on site primarily consists of pine flatwoods with palmetto subcanopy, pine flatwoods with graminoid subcanopy, cypress -pine- cabbage palm, melaleuca, fallow agricultural land, and other open agricultural lands. Exotic vegetation (i.e., Brazilian pepper and melaleuca) has invaded most habitat types. The levels of infestation of melaleuca and Brazilian pepper have increased significantly since the original site mapping. Many of the wet prairies, pine flatwoods, pine graminoid and pine - cypress- cabbage palms habitats have been heavily invaded by melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper. A detailed vegetative inventory and FLUCCS map is included. F. The Project is located within the Cocohatchee River Basin (Class II) as depicted within the Collier County Drainage Atlas (June 1998). 1.5 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT LBP has received a Binding Letter of Interpretation of DRI status from the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) determining that the project is not a DRI and will result in no regionally significant impacts. At the time the binding letter was received, the project was known as Toulon. 1.6 DENSITY A. Mediterra is to be developed on 1,696 acres in north Collier County and south Lee County. The number of dwelling units authorized to be built pursuant to the DCA's binding letter, dated February 5, 1999, is 950 units. The gross project density, therefore, will be a maximum of 0.56 units per acre. The number of dwelling units to be built in Collier County pursuant to this PUD will not exceed 750. B. At all times all property included within Mediterra as described in Section 1.2 shall be included in determining the Collier County project area density. 1125/2001- 52046 Vef: t0A- Menkim cnw 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.1 PURPOSE 16J1 ,., The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of development for Mediterra, and to identify relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures. 2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES A. Mediterra, a private golf course community, will include a range of single family and multi - family housing along with a Village Center, which will provide many services and facilities that support its residents, including, but not limited to club facilities, community meeting rooms, small scale neighborhood retail goods and services, and a recreation and aquatic center. B. The Master Plan is illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A" (WM, Inc. File No. D- 2934-54). A Land Use Summary indicating approximate land use acreages is shown on the plan. The location, size, and configuration of individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval with minor adjustments at the time of Final Plat approval, in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2, of the LDC. 2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES A. Regulations for development of Mediterra shall be in accordance with the contents of this PUD Ordinance, and to the extent they are not inconsistent with this PUD Ordinance, applicable sections of the LDC and Collier County Growth Management Plan which are in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of improvements, such as but not limited to Final Subdivision Plat, Final Site Development Plan, Excavation Permit and Preliminary Work Authorization. Where this PUD Ordinance does not provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the specific section of the LDC that is otherwise applicable shall apply. B. Unless otherwise defined herein, or as necessarily implied by context, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of development order application. C. Development permitted by the approval of this PUD will be subject to the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, Division 3.15 of the LDC, and the Developers Contribution Agreement dated February 17, 1998, as amended, with respect to road impact fee credits and the vesting of Certificates of Public Facilities Adequacy. CAW].... - .o'. 'w — 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,2 D. Unless modified, waived or excepted by this PUD or by subsequent request, the provisions of other applicable sections of the Land Development Code remain in effect with respect to the development of the land which comprises this PUD. E. All conditions imposed herein are part of the regulations which govern the manner in which the land may be developed. F. The Subdivisions Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.2) shall apply to Mediterra, except where an exemption is set forth herein or otherwise granted pursuant to Land Development Code Section 3.2.4. G. The Site Development Plans Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.3) shall apply to Mediterra, except where an exemption is set forth herein or otherwise granted pursuant to Land Development Code Section 3.3.4. H. For purposes of the various impact fee ordinances, residential uses, other than the conventional single family detached dwellings, shall be classified as either multi- family or condominium/townhouse in accord with definitions of the applicable impact fee ordinance. 2.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A. LBP may elect to establish a Community Development District (CDD) to provide and maintain infrastructure and community facilities needed to serve the Project. Such a CDD would constitute a timely, efficient, effective, responsive and economic way to ensure the provision of facilities and infrastructure for the proposed development. Such infrastructure as would be constructed, managed and financed by such a CDD shall be subject to, and shall not be inconsistent with, the Collier County Growth Management Plan and all applicable ordinances dealing with planning and permitting of Mediterra. B. The land area is amenable to infrastructure provision by a district that has the powers set forth in the charter of a Community Development District under Section 190.006 through 190.041, Florida Statutes. Such a district is a legitimate alternative available both to the County and to the landowner for the timely and sustained provision of quality infrastructure under the terms and conditions of County development approval. 2.5 ROADWAYS Standards for roads shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the LDC regulating subdivisions, unless otherwise modified, waived or excepted by this PUD or approved during Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval. LBP reserves the right to request substitutions to Code design standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2 of the LDC. LBP retains the right to establish gates, guardhouses, other access controls, signs and monuments 4/2512001- 52046 6 Ver: 10A- Menldns CAM 02934- 007-001- ESBM- 22969 16J1 ,.3 as may be deemed appropriate by LBP on all privately owned and maintained project roadways. A. Roadways within Mediterra shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Section 3.2.8.4.16. of the LDC with the following substitutions: 1. LDC Section 3.2.8.4.16.5. - Street right -of -way width: The minimum right - of -way width to be utilized for a local street within Mediterra shall be forty (40) feet. 2. LDC Section 3.2.8.4.16.8. - Intersection radii: Street intersections shall be provided with a minimum of a twenty (20) foot radius (face of curb) for all internal project streets and a thirty -five (35) foot radius for intersections at project entrances. 3. LDC Section 3.2.8.4.16.10. - Reverse Curves: Tangents shall not be required between reverse curves on any project streets. 4. LDC Section 3.2.8.4.16.6. - Cul -de -sac radius: The minimum right -of -way radius to be utilized shall be fifty -five (55) feet. B. Sidewalks/bike paths shall conform with Section 3.2.8.3.17. of the LDC except as follows: 1. LDC Section 3.2.8.3.17.2. - The Mediterra loop road shall be considered a minor collector street and shall have an eight -foot (8') wide pathway on one side of the street that will meander in and out of the right -of -way. 2. LDC Section 3.2.8.3.17.2. - Both project entrance streets shall require a sidewalk or bikepath on one side of the street. 3. LDC Section 3.2.8.3.17.3. - All cul -de -sacs shall not be required to have a sidewalk or bikepath provided the following conditions are satisfied: a) the right -of -way section shall include two ten foot (10') wide travel lanes, with two foot (2') mountable curbs, and b) the gross density of the cul -de -sac shall be less than two (2) units per acre. 2.6 LAKE SETBACK AND EXCAVATION A. An excavation permit will be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with Division 3.5 of the LDC and SFWMD rules. The minimum lake setbacks from lakes to roadways shall be 20 feet from the back of the non - mountable (barrier) curb to the edge of water. Upon approval by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator, equal substitutes to non - mountable 4/2512001 - 52048 Ver: 10A- AJenldns — — CAW 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,< (barrier) curb will be allowed. The minimum lake setback from lakes to the Project boundary shall be 20 feet. B. Upon receipt of a development excavation permit, all lakes greater than two (2) acres may be excavated to the maximum commercial excavation depths set forth in Section 3.5.7.3.1, however removal of fill and rock from Mediterra shall be administratively permitted in an amount up to 10 percent per lake (20,000 cubic yards maximum), unless a commercial excavation permit is issued. C. Excavation for Livingston Road construction north of Immokalee Road and off - site hauling of rock and fill materials shall be a permitted use within this PUD subject to the receipt of a development excavation permit which shall be administratively processed by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. D. Commercial excavation and offsite hauling of up to 500,000 cubic yards of rock and fill materials shall be a permitted use within this PUD subject to the receipt of a commercial excavation permit which shall be administratively processed by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. 2.7 USE OF RIGHTS -OF -WAY Utilization of lands within all project rights -of -way for landscaping, decorative entrance ways, and signage shall be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by LBP and the Collier County Development Services Director for engineering and safety considerations during the development review process and prior to any installations. 2.8 MODEL HOMES /SALES CENTERS /CONSTRUCTION OFFICES Model homes, sales centers, sales offices, construction offices, and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real estate including, but not limited to, pavilions, viewing platforms, gazebos, parking areas, tents, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout Mediterra. These uses may be either wet or dry facilities. These uses shall be subject to the requirements of Section 2.6.33.4 and Section 3.2.6.3.6, of the LDC, with the exception that five (5) dry models shall be allowed within each development tract, and the temporary use permit shall be valid through the buildout of the project with no extension of the temporary use required. These uses may use septic tanks or holding tanks for waste disposal subject to permitting under F.A.C. 1013-6, and may use potable or irrigation wells. 2.9 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance or PUD Master Plan as provided in Section 2.7.3.5 of the LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described herein may be made by LBP in connection with any type of development or permit application required by the LDC. 4/2512001- 52045 Ver: 10A- Menidns CAMS 02934- 007-001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 =, The Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the Mediterra Master Plan upon written request of LBP. A. The following limitations shall apply to such requests: 1. The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Mediterra PUD document. 2. The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a substantial change pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5.1. of the LDC. 3. The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with adjacent land uses and shall not create detrimental impacts to abutting land uses, water management facilities, and conservation areas within or external to the PUD. B. The following shall be deemed minor changes or refinements: 1. Reconfiguration of lakes, ponds, canals, or other water management facilities where such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District and Collier County. 2. Internal realignment of rights -of -ways, other than a relocation of access points to the PUD itself, where water management facility, preservation areas, or required easements are not adversely affected or otherwise provided for. 3. Reconfiguration of parcels when there is no encroachment into the conservation area. C. Minor changes and refinements as described above shall be reviewed by appropriate Collier County Staff to ensure that said changes and refinements are otherwise in compliance with all applicable County Ordinances and regulations prior to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator's consideration for approval. D. Approval by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator of a minor change or refinement may occur independently from and prior to any application for Subdivision or Site Development Plan approval, however such approval shall not constitute an authorization for development or implementation of the minor change or refinement without first obtaining all other necessary County permits and approvals. 2.10 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE 4/2572001 -520x8 Ver: 10A- AJenldne - -- - -- - CAM 02934 -007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,6 Most common area maintenance will be provided by a CDD or a Property Owners' Association. A CDD is a legitimate alternative for the timely and sustained provision of quality common area infrastructure and maintenance under the terms and conditions of a County development approval. For those areas not maintained by a CDD, LBP shall create a property owners' association or associations, whose functions shall include provision for the perpetual maintenance of common facilities and open spaces. A CDD or the property owners' association, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and management of the surface water management systems and preserves serving Mediterra, in accordance with the provisions of Collier County Ordinance 90 -48 and Resolution 90 -292, together with any applicable permits from the South Florida Water Management District. 2.11 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout Mediterra. The following standards shall apply: A. Landscape berms shall have the following maximum side slopes: 1. Grassed berms 3:1 2. Ground covered berms 2:1 3. Rip -Rap berms 1:1 4. Structural walled berms - vertical B. Fence or wall maximum height: Ten feet (10'), as measured from the finished floor elevation of the nearest residential structure within the development. If the fence or wall is constructed on a landscape berm that is higher than the nearest residential structure, the wall shall not exceed eight feet (8') in height from the top of berm. C. Upon submission of a typical cross - section, aerial, plan view and vegetation removal permit application, the Community Development and Environmental Services Department Administrator may approve landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls to be constructed along the perimeter of the Mediterra PUD boundary prior to preliminary subdivision plat and site development plan submittal. Subsequent to construction, all such areas must be included in a landscape easement or tract on final plats, or identified in a separate recorded instrument. D. Fences or walls may be placed zero feet (0') from internal right -of -way provided that shrubs are provided in the right -of -way pursuant to Section 2.7 and may be located five feet (5') from project perimeter. E. Fences and walls which are an integral part of security and access control structures such as gate houses and control gates shall be subject to the height limitations for principal residential structures. In the case of access control structures within rights - of -way adjoining two or more different districts, the more restrictive height standard shall apply. 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 =, F. Pedestrian sidewalks and/or bike paths, water management systems, drainage structures, signs and utilities are allowed in landscape buffers /easements as approved by the Mediterra Design Review Team. G. Landscape berms located within the Mediterra PUD boundary and contiguous to a property line and/or right -of -way line may be constructed such that the toe of slope is located on the property line and/or right -of -way line. H. Internal recreational and community facilities do not require perimeter buffers. 2.12 CLEARING AND FILL STORAGE Fill storage is generally permitted as a principal use throughout Mediterra. Fill material may be transported and stockpiled within areas which have been disturbed/farmed or are shown as development areas on an approved PSP. Prior to stockpiling in these locations, LBP shall provide written notification to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. Residential areas 25 acres or less (including building footprints) shall be allowed to be cleared prior to the issuance of the building permits, provided the areas to be cleared are shown on an approved subdivision construction plan or SDP. The following standards shall apply for all stockpiling on -site: A. Stockpile maximum height: forty -five feet (45') B. Stockpile maximum slide slopes: 2:1 C. Fill storage areas in excess of ten feet (10') in height shall be separated from developed areas by fencing, excavated water bodies or other physical barriers if the side slope of the stockpile is steeper than 4 to 1 (i.e. 3 to 1). D. Soil erosion control shall be provided in accordance with LDC Division 3.7. 2.13 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS A. The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control, as set forth in the LDC, Section 2.2.20.2.3. B. Mediterra is planned as a private, functionally interrelated community under unified control. LBP has established community -wide design guidelines and standards to ensure a high and consistent level of quality for community features and facilities, which include features and facilities such as landscaping, hardscape, waterscapes, signage, lighting, sidewalks, bicycle paths, pavement treatments, roadway medians, fences, walls, buffers, berms and other similar facilities. To further ensure that the 412512001- 52046 Ver- 10A- AJenMns Ca 02934 -007 -001- ESBM- 22969 16J1 ,s Mediterra design guidelines and standards are complied with, no SDP or PSP may be submitted or approved without the Mediterra Design Review approval. 2.14 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT PHASING Submission, review, and approval of Preliminary Subdivision Plats for the project may be accomplished in phases to correspond with the planned development of the property. 2.15 AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES The site is currently undeveloped or used for agriculture or cattle grazing purposes, and associated and accessory uses thereto. These existing agricultural uses shall be permitted to continue throughout the project site and will be phased out as development occurs within individual parcels. 2.16 GENERAL PERMITTED USES Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the Mediterra PUD except in the Wetland Conservation Area. General permitted uses are those uses which generally serve LBP and residents of Mediterra and are typically part of the common infrastructure or are considered community facilities. A. General Permitted Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under LDC, Section 2.6.9.1. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Temporary sewage treatment facilities. 4. Septic system for remote golf shelters 5. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 6. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 7. Community and neighborhood parks, trails and recreational facilities. 8. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for LBP and LBP's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 4/2512001- 52048 Ver: 10A- Menktrm CAW 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22969 16J1 , -, 9. Landscape/hardscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences, water features and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.11 of this PUD. 10. Fill storage, site filling and grading are subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.12 of this PUD. 11. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible. B. Development Standards: Unless otherwise set forth in this document, the following development standards shall apply to structures: 1. Guardhouses, gatehouses, signage and landscape features, and access control structures shall have no required setback. 2. Setback from property lines: Front: ten feet (10') Side: five feet (5') Rear: ten feet (10') 3. Minimum distance between structures which are part of an architecturally unified grouping - five feet (5). 4. Minimum distance between unrelated structures - ten feet (10'). 5. Maximum height of structures - thirty -five feet (35'). 6. Minimum floor area - None required. 7. Minimum lot or parcel area - None required. 8. Sidewalks and bikepaths may occur within County required buffers. 9. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein or within Mediterra development standards, are to be in accordance with the applicable LDC provision in effect at the time this PUD is approved. 4/25!2001 -52046 Ver. IOA- AJenldne CAW 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,,a 2.17 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS The PUD Master Plan identifies approximately 646 acres included in the preserve area, lakes, recreation, open space, golf and buffer designations. These areas, in conjunction with open space areas included within the Residential District, fully satisfy the open space requirements of Section 2.6.32 of the LDC. 2.18 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS The preserve areas on site shall satisfy the requirements of Policy 6.4.6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. There may be some minor adjustments to the proposed preserve areas during SFWMD permitting. 2.19 SIGNAGE A. GENERAL 1. All Collier County sign regulations in force at the time of approval shall apply unless such regulations are in conflict with the conditions set forth in this Section, in which case the PUD Document shall govern. 2. For the purpose of this PUD Document, each platted parcel shall be considered a separate parcel of land and shall be entitled to any sign as permitted herein. 3. Should any of the signs be requested to be placed within a County dedicated right -of -way, a right -of way permit must be applied for and approved. 4. All signs shall be located so as not to cause sight line obstructions. 5. All internal project rights -of -way may be utilized for decorative landscaped entrance features and signage subject to review and approval from the Planning Services Department for consistency with the requirements set forth herein. 6. Signs may be allowed in landscape buffers /easements with the approval of the Mediterra Design Review Team. B. BOUNDARY MARKERS 1. One boundary marker or monument may be located at each property corner. The boundary marker may contain the name of the community, and the insignia or motto of the development. 4/25/2001 -52048 Ver: 1 QA- AJenlans CAMS 02934 -007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J12-11 2. The sign face area may not exceed 80 square feet and may not exceed the height or length of the monument upon which it is located. If the sign is two - sided, each sign face may not exceed 60 square feet in area. 3. Sign face area is calculated by total square footage of name, insignia, and motto only. 4. The setback for the signs from Livingston Road rights -of -way and any perimeter property line shall be 5 feet. C. PROJECT ENTRANCE SIGNS 1. Three ground or wall- mounted entrance signs maybe located at on both sides of the entrance right -of -way and in the entry median. Such signs may contain the name of the subdivision, and the insignia or motto of the development. 2. No sign face area may exceed 100 square feet and the total sign face area of Entrance Signs may not exceed 200 square feet. If the sign is a single, two -sided sign, each sign face may not extend beyond 100 square feet in area. The sign face area shall not exceed the height or length of the wall or monument upon which it is located. 3. The setback for the signs from Livingston Road rights -of -way and any perimeter property line shall be 5 feet. 4. Entrance signs may not exceed a height of 20 feet above the finished ground level of the sign site. For the purpose of this provision, finished grade shall be considered to be no greater than 18 inches above the highest crown elevation of the nearest road, unless the wall or monument is constructed on a perimeter landscape berm. D. TEMPORARY SIGNS 1. Temporary signs may be permitted and may consist of the following types: project identification, boundary marker, real estate, sales center identification, and directional. 2. Each sign may not exceed 160 square feet in area. If the sign is two - sided, each sign face may not exceed 160 square feet in area. 3. The setback for temporary signs from Livingston Road rights -of -way and any perimeter property line shall be 5 feet. 4/2512001- 52048 Ver 10A- AJeNdns caws 02934 -007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 2.,, 4. Temporary signs may not exceed 20 feet in height above the finished ground level of the sign site. 5. Temporary signs may remain in place simultaneously with permanent signage until the project reaches 99% build -out. 6. Special event signs not exceeding 32 square feet per side in size may be displayed to announce or advertise such temporary uses as open houses, community fairs or programs or any charitable, educational event. Such sign shall be located no closer than 10 feet to any property line. Such signs may be displayed on light poles. 7. Grand opening signs: LBP may display on -site grand opening signs not exceeding 32 square feet total. 8. No building permit is required for temporary signs as listed above. E. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SIGNS 1. Two "construction ahead" signs may be located at appropriate distances ahead of a construction entrance, with a maximum of 20 square feet each in size. No building permit is required. 2. One sign, with a maximum of 20 square feet in size, may be located at each construction entrance to identify the entrance as such. No building permit is required. F. INTERNAL SIGNS 1. Residential and community facilities entrance signs may be located on both sides of the neighborhood entrance street and within the entry median. Setbacks from internal road right -of -way may be zero feet (0'). Such signs may be used to identify the location of neighborhoods, club house, recreational areas and other features within Mediterra. Individual signs may be a maximum of 100 square feet per sign face area. Such signs may have a maximum height of 12 feet. No building permit is required. 2. Directional or identification signs may be allowed internal to the subdivision. Such signs may be used to identify the location or direction of approved uses such as sales centers, model centers, recreational uses, information centers, or the individual components of the development. Individual signs may be a maximum of 6 square feet per side or signs maintaining a common architectural theme may be combined to form a menu board with a maximum size of 64 square feet per side and a maximum height of 8 feet. 4125/2001- 52048 Ver. 10A- AJsnkins CANS 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,„ 3. LBP may have real estate signs with a maximum size of 6 square feet per side in residential districts. Such signs may advertise "For Sale ", "Sold To ", "Lot # ", etc. No building permit is required. G. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic signs such as street signs, stop signs, and speed limit signs may be designed to reflect a common architectural theme. 4125/2001 -52046 Vw: wA- AJeMdne CAW 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22969 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 3.1 PURPOSE 16J1 The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within Mediterra designated on the Master Plan as "R." 3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS The number of dwelling units authorized to be built pursuant to the DCA's binding letter, dated February 5, 1999, is 950 units. The number of dwelling units to be built in Collier County pursuant to this PUD will not exceed 750. 3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "R" on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of residential dwelling types, compatible non - residential uses, a full range of recreational facilities, essential services, and customary accessory uses. The approximate acreage of the "R" District is indicated on the PUD Master Plan. This acreage is based on conceptual designs and is approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3, and Division 3.2 respectively, of the LDC. Residential tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, recreational facilities and other similar uses found in residential areas. 3.4 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single Family Detached Dwellings 2. Single Family Patio and Zero Lot Line Dwellings 3. Single Family Attached Dwellings 4. Multi - Family Dwellings 5. Guest Houses 8/5/2001- 52046 Ver: 108- Aimidne 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 a 6. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in the "R" District. B. Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this district including neighborhood community recreational facilities. 2. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in the "R" District. 3.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table I sets forth the development standards for land uses within the 'R' Residential District. B. Site development standards for single family uses apply to individual residential lot boundaries. Multi - family standards apply to platted parcel boundaries. C. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein or within adopted Mediterra design guidelines and standards, are to be in accordance with the LDC in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. D. Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table I shall be established during Site Development Plan Approval as set forth in Article 3, Division 3.3. of the Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use. E. Required property development regulations may be approved that are different than those set forth in Table I, subject to approval by the Collier County Planning Commission, in accordance with the criteria contained in Section 2.6.27.4.6.1 through 2.6.27.4.6.3 of the LDC. Common open space requirements are deemed satisfied pursuant to Section 2.17 of this PUD. F. The Collier County Public Works Division shall allow the installation of potable water and irrigation water service connections to distribution mains during construction of the single family subdivision utilities. The installation will be scheduled upon request and payment of fees by LBP, its successors and/or assigns. The installation will be in accordance with the approved plans and specifications, 4/2512001- 52048 Ver: 10A- AJenidm 02934-007-001- ESSM- 22959 _ 16J1 n current policies and procedures, and performed by LBP's contractor. The contractor must be approved for the installation by the Collier County Public Works Division. Fees will be determined in accordance with the impact fee ordinance in effect at the time of the request for connections. 4/2512001 -52046 Ver: 1 GA- AJwWns CY19 02934- 007 -001- ES13M- 22959 16J1 TABLE I MEDITERRA DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR "R" RF,STDRNTTAT. ARFAQ BH: Building Height SBH: (Sum of Building Heights): Combined height of two adjacent buildings for the purpose of determining setback requirements. Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the development standards to be applied by the Customer Services Department during an application for a building permit. For all patio or zero lot line units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations shall be submitted to the Customer Services Department with the application for the first building permit. The conceptual exhibit may be modified as needed. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. Any structure more than two stories in height will maintain a 20 foot minimum building separation. Guest houses shall meet the applicable principal structure setbacks. Flag lots shall have no minimum lot width but will meet lot area requirements Project walls shall be allowed within 1 foot of the right -of -way line. With approval from LBP, front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right -of -way, setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). *1 - Setback from lake for all accessory uses may be 0 feet providing architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from LBP Design Review Committee and Project Plan Review. *2 - Building height shall be the vertical distance measured from the first habitable finished floor elevation to the uppermost finished ceiling elevation of the structure. *3 - Units with side entry garage may have a 12 foot front yard setback. Units with front entry garage must have a minimum 20 foot front yard setback. *4 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 S.F. for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 S.F. *5- Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul -de -sac lots provided minimum lot area requirement is still maintained. *6 - Zero foot (0') minimum side setback on either or both sides as long as a minimum 10 foot separation between principal structures is maintained. Patios, pools and screen enclosures may encroach into the 10 foot principal structure separation and may attach to the adjoining dwelling provided an easement is granted from the adjoining dwelling unit owner. Where this option is used a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations for patio or zero lot line units shall be submitted to the Customer Services Department with the application for the fast building permit. This conceptual exhibit will be used to determine the 10 foot spacing requirement between principal and accessory structures. The conceptual exhibit may be modified as needed. *7 With written approval from LLBP Design Review Committee, the setback from the twenty foot (20') lake maintenance easement for principal structures may be zero feet (0') with a minimum twenty feet (20') from the waters edge. *8 Setback from lake may be 0 feet providing architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from LBP Design Review Committee and Project Plan Review &512001- 52046 Ver: 108- AJenkine CAM 02934- 007 -001- ESSM- 22959 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED PATIO & ZERO LOT LINE TWO FAMILY DUPLEX & DUPLEX SINGLE FAMILY '+ ATTACHED AND TOWNHOUSE MULTI FAMILY DWELLINGS Minimum Lot Area 7,500 SF 5,000 SF 3,500 SF *4 3,000 SF NA Minimum Lot Width *5 75 50 35 30 NA Front Yard Setback (Principal and Accessory) 20 20 *3 12/20 *3 12/20 *3 20 Front Yard for Side Entry Garage 12 12 12 12 12 Rear Yard Setback *7 (Principal) 10 5 *8 10 10 .5 BH Rear Yard Setback*] (Accessory) 5 5 5 5 10 Side Yard Setback 7.5 0 *6 0 or 7.5 0 or .5 BH .5 BH Maximum Height *2 40 35 35 35 50 Floor Area Minimum (SF) 1800 SF 1600 SF 1600 SF 1200 SF 1000 SF Distance Between Principal Structures 15 10 0 or 15 .5 SBH .5 SBH BH: Building Height SBH: (Sum of Building Heights): Combined height of two adjacent buildings for the purpose of determining setback requirements. Minimum lot areas for any unit type may be exceeded. The unit type, and not the minimum lot area, shall define the development standards to be applied by the Customer Services Department during an application for a building permit. For all patio or zero lot line units, a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations shall be submitted to the Customer Services Department with the application for the first building permit. The conceptual exhibit may be modified as needed. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. Any structure more than two stories in height will maintain a 20 foot minimum building separation. Guest houses shall meet the applicable principal structure setbacks. Flag lots shall have no minimum lot width but will meet lot area requirements Project walls shall be allowed within 1 foot of the right -of -way line. With approval from LBP, front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right -of -way, setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). *1 - Setback from lake for all accessory uses may be 0 feet providing architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from LBP Design Review Committee and Project Plan Review. *2 - Building height shall be the vertical distance measured from the first habitable finished floor elevation to the uppermost finished ceiling elevation of the structure. *3 - Units with side entry garage may have a 12 foot front yard setback. Units with front entry garage must have a minimum 20 foot front yard setback. *4 - Each half of a duplex unit requires a lot area allocation of 3,500 S.F. for a total minimum lot area of 7,000 S.F. *5- Minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% for cul -de -sac lots provided minimum lot area requirement is still maintained. *6 - Zero foot (0') minimum side setback on either or both sides as long as a minimum 10 foot separation between principal structures is maintained. Patios, pools and screen enclosures may encroach into the 10 foot principal structure separation and may attach to the adjoining dwelling provided an easement is granted from the adjoining dwelling unit owner. Where this option is used a conceptual exhibit showing typical building configurations for patio or zero lot line units shall be submitted to the Customer Services Department with the application for the fast building permit. This conceptual exhibit will be used to determine the 10 foot spacing requirement between principal and accessory structures. The conceptual exhibit may be modified as needed. *7 With written approval from LLBP Design Review Committee, the setback from the twenty foot (20') lake maintenance easement for principal structures may be zero feet (0') with a minimum twenty feet (20') from the waters edge. *8 Setback from lake may be 0 feet providing architectural bank treatment is incorporated into design and subject to written approval from LBP Design Review Committee and Project Plan Review &512001- 52046 Ver: 108- AJenkine CAM 02934- 007 -001- ESSM- 22959 SECTION IV VILLAGE CENTER 4.1 PURPOSE 16J1 The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within Mediterra designated on the Master Plan as "Village Center." 4.2 MAXIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE A maximum of 60,000 square feet floor area of non - commercial uses as listed below, and 20,000 square feet floor area of commercial uses as listed below, may be constructed on lands designated "Village Center." 4.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The approximate acreage of the Village Center District is indicated on the Master Plan. This acreage is based on conceptual designs and is approximate. Actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3, and Division 3.2 respectively, of the LDC. The Village Center tract is designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar uses. 4.4 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Golf courses, golf clubhouses, and golf facilities. 2. General store with convenience goods and deli. 3. Tennis, health and fitness, swimming and other recreational clubs. 4. Project information and sales centers. 5. Community and golf course maintenance areas, maintenance buildings, essential services, irrigation water and effluent storage tanks and ponds, water and wastewater treatment plants, septic systems, utilities pumping facilities and pump buildings, utility and maintenance staff offices. 6. Public administration facilities. 61512001- 52046 Ver: 106- AJerJdns CAW 02934. 007-001- ESBM- 22069 16J1 ,, 7. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters. 8. Temporary construction access roads. 9. Commercial banks - drive - through facilities are prohibited (Groups 6021- 6029) 10. Real estate agents and managers for property within PUD only (Group 653 1) 11. Hardware store only - 2,500 sq./ ft. maximum floor area (Group 525 1) 12. Variety stores - 2,500 sq. ft. maximum floor area. (Group 533 1) 13. Miscellaneous general merchandise stores, except catalog showrooms - 2,500 sq. ft. maximum floor area (Group 5399) 14. Grocery stores, except frozen food and freezer plans - 10,000 sq. ft. maximum floor area (Group 5411) 15. Fish, meat, and seafood markets only (Group 542 1) 16. Fruit and vegetable markets (Group 543 1) 17. Retail bakeries (Group 5461) 18. Health food store only - 2,500 sq. ft. maximum floor area (Group 5499) 19. Gasoline service stations, except truck stops (Groups 5541) 20. Apparel and accessory stores - 2,500 sq. ft. maximum floor area (Groups 5611 -5661) 21. Record and prerecord tape stores (Group 5735) 22. Eating places, except caterers and industrial and institutional food service establishments, dinner theaters, drive -in restaurants and restaurants with drive- through facilities (Group 5812) 23. Liquor stores (Group 5921) 24. Gift, novelty, and souvenir shops (Group 5947) 25. Sewing, needlework, and piece goods stores (Group 5949) 26. Florists (Group 5992) 4/25/2001 - 52048 Ver: I OA- AJeNdne CA"3 02934-007 -001- ESBM- 22969 16J1 ,, 27. Agents for laundries and dry - cleaner only (Group 7212) 28. Coin - operated laundries and dry- cleaning (Group 7215) 29. Diaper service, and garment alteration and repair shops only (Group 7219) 30. Beauty shops, except beauty schools and cosmetology schools (Group 723 1) 31. Barber shops, except barber colleges (Group 7241) 32. Depilatory salon, electrolysis, massage parlor, shopping service for individuals, and tanning salons only (Group 7299) 33. Housekeeping and maid service only (Group 7349) 34. Video tape rental (Group 7841) 35. Physical fitness facilities (Group 7991) 36. Offices and/or clinics of physicians, and offices and/or clinics of dentists (Groups 8011 -8021) 37. Offices and clinics of chiropractors (Group 8041) 38. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses (including general and professional offices not specifically listed above) and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible in the Village Center District. B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this District. 2. Customary accessory uses include, but are not limited to, recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of the permitted uses such as pool, tennis facilities, parks, playgrounds and playfields. 3. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in the Village Center District. 4.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard: Principal Structure - Twenty feet (20') minimum or one -half the building height, whichever is greater. Accessory structure - Ten feet (10'). 4/25/2001- 62046 Ver: ton- A.Ienldns CAW 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,, 2. Side Yard: Principal Structure - Fifteen feet (15'). Accessory structure - Five feet (5'). 3. Rear Yard: Principal Structure - Twenty feet (20'). Accessory structure - Five feet (5'). 4. Setback from a lake for all principal and accessory uses may be zero feet (0') provided architectural bank treatment is incorporated into the design. B. Exterior lighting shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and residential properties from direct glare or unreasonable interference. C. Maximum height of structures - Fifty feet (50'), except clock towers or similar architectural features, which shall be permitted up to sixty -five feet (65'). D. Commercial uses shall be located a minimum of two hundred and fifty feet (250') from the perimeter boundaries of the PUD and the nearest external roadway providing access to the PUD. E. Commercial uses shall be located within a 1/3 mile radius of at least 80% of the residential units that are east of Livingston Road North- South. F. Minimum distance between all other principal structures - Fifteen feet (15') G. Minimum distance between all other accessory structures - Ten feet (10'). H. Minimum floor area - None required I. Maximum floor area ratio for commercial uses - 0.25 J. Minimum lot or parcel area - None required K. Minimum lot width - None required L. Parking for any and all uses and structures constructed in the Village Center District: one (1) space per 200 square feet of building area. M. Standards for landscaping, architecture, and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein are to be in accordance with LDC in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. 4/25/2001 - 52046 Vx: IOA- AJwIdna Cu 02934 -007 -001- ESBM. 22969 16J1 SECTION V RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within Mediterra designated on the Master Plan as "R/O ". 5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "R/O" on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of golf course, recreational, water management and open space uses, as well as to provide lands for community- related ancillary uses and essential services. 5.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. Golf courses, golf clubhouses, and golf facilities. 2. Tennis, health and fitness, swimming and other recreational clubs. 3. Project information and sales centers. 4. Community and golf course maintenance areas, maintenance buildings, essential services, irrigation water and effluent storage tanks and ponds, water and wastewater treatment plants, septic systems, utilities pumping facilities and pump buildings, utility and maintenance staff offices. 5. Public administration facilities. 6. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, bikeways, landscape nurseries, gazebos, canoe docks, fishing piers, picnic areas, fitness trails and shelters. 7. Temporary construction access roads. 8. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible in the "R/O" District. 6/612001 -52046 Vw: 1 GB- AJenkine cA#ea 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22969 16J1 ,_ B. Permitted Uses And Structures Within Archaeological Site 1. Opens space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, nature trails, bicycle trails, gazebos, picnic areas, fitness trails, shelters, playground equipment and associated playground areas, landscaped areas, irrigation pipes, volleyball courts, rest shelters, and drinking fountains. Any uses and structures permitted shall not disturb areas beneath the existing soil surface and a minimum of 6 inches of clean fill dirt shall be placed over the area except in places where the area will be left in its natural state or will be landscaped. A certified archaeologist shall be present on site to monitor any excavation for irrigation pipes and landscaping. 2. Any other uses and structures which are comparable in nature with the foregoing and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible. C. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this District. 2. Pro - shops, practice areas and ranges, golf cart barns, rest rooms, shelters, snack bars. 3. Retail establishments accessory to the permitted uses of the district such as, but not limited to, golf, tennis, and recreational related sales. 4. Restaurants, cocktail lounges, and similar uses intended to serve the residents of Mediterra and their guests. 5. Telecommunications facilities. 6. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible in the "R/O" and Miscellaneous Open Space/Buffer District. 5.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Principal structures shall be set back a minimum of ten feet (10') from "R/O" District boundaries and private roads, and twenty -five feet (25') from all PUD boundaries and residential tracts, except where the PUD abuts a public right of way, in which case the setback shall be one half (V2) the height of the structure. B. Accessory structures shall set back a minimum of five feet (5) from "R/O" District - boundaries and private roads, and twenty feet (20') from all PUD boundaries and 41252001- 52046 Ver: 10A- AJeridm cA.0 02934- 007 -001- ESSM- 22969 16J1 ,., residential tracts, except where the PUD abuts a public right of way, in which case the setback shall be one half ('/2) the height of the structure. C. Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and residential properties from direct glare or unreasonable interference. D. Maximum height of structures - Sixty -five feet (65'). E. Minimum distance between principal or accessory structures which are a part of an architecturally unified grouping - Ten feet (10'). F. Minimum distance between all other principal structures - Fifteen feet (15'). G. Minimum distance between all other accessory structures - Ten feet (10'). H. Minimum floor area - None required. I. Minimum lot or parcel area - None required. J. Parking for the community center /clubhouse shall be one space per every two hundred (200) square feet of gross floor area, excluding cart storage areas, which shall be considered inclusive of required golf course parking K. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein or within Mediterra design development standards, are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. L. Golf course rest stations and secondary maintenance buildings will be permitted to use septic tanks or holding tanks for waste disposal subject to permitting under Rule IOD -6 F.A.C., and may use potable and irrigation wells. 4126/2001- 52046 Ver: 10A- AJenkins caw 02934.007 -001- ESBM- 22959 SECTION VI PRESERVATION AREA 6.1 PURPOSE 16J1 The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for the area within Mediterra designated on the Master Plan, as Preservation Area. 6.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Preservation Area on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate conservation interpretive /educational trails and limited water management uses and functions. 6.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. Boardwalks golf cart paths and nature trails (elevated and at grade), and gazebos. 2. Water management facilities. 3. Temporary construction access road. 4. Utility or roadway crossings. 5. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible in the Preservation Area. 6.4 RESERVE DISTRICT CONSERVATION EASEMENT A non - exclusive conservation easement or platted tract, whichever is applicable, is required for preservation lands included in the Preservation Area. LBP, their successor or assigns, or the Mediterra CDD shall be responsible for the control and maintenance of lands within the Preservation Area. 52048 Ver: 108- AJwWne 1-001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,, SECTION VII GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 7.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the general development commitments of LBP within Mediterra. 7.2 GENERAL A. All facilities shall be constructed in accordance with the final site development plans, the final subdivision plats, and all applicable state and local laws, codes and regulations relating to the subdivision of the land, except where specifically noted or otherwise set forth in this document, or as otherwise approved by Collier County. All state and federal permits shall be effective according to the stipulations and conditions of the permitting agencies. Final master plans, final site development plans or final subdivision plats, and standards and specifications of the Collier County Land Development Code relating to the same shall apply to this Project, except as otherwise set forth herein. B. In addition, the Master Plan and the regulations of the PUD document as adopted along with any other specific conditions or stipulations as may be agreed to in the rezone hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, shall control and be applicable to development of the subject property. LBP, its successors and assigns shall be bound by said documents, commitments, and stipulations. 7.3 MONITORING REPORT An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Article 2, Division 2.7, Section 2.7.3.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 7.4 TRANSPORTATION A. LBP shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal at the main project entrance onto Livingston Road (North- South) when deemed warranted by Collier County. The signal shall be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. B. Collier County and LBP entered into a Developer Contribution Agreement dated 17 February 1998, as amended (herein "Agreement'), to address the design, right -of -way acquisition, permitting, and construction of Livingston Road from Immokalee Road to the Lee /Collier County Line. C. As depicted on the Master Plan, Exhibit "A ", LBP has reserved, pursuant to the terms authorized in the Agreement, a 100 foot wide right -of -way along the eastern edge of the project for the construction of Livingston Road (North/South), and LBP has 6/&2001- 52048 Ver 198 - AJenkim o�ew 02934- 007 -091- ESBM- 22959 16J1 7-2 reserved a 170 foot wide right -of -way along the southern edge of the Project for the construction of Livingston Road (East - West). D. It is acknowledged that the cost of construction of Livingston Road is an advanced payment of Road Impact Fees pursuant to the terms of the Agreement (and that LBP is eligible for impact fee credits). Notwithstanding the determination of the adequacy of other public facilities and the payment of any other appropriate impact fees, LBP has complied with the requirements for transportation adequacy for the issuance of Certificate(s) of Public Facility Adequacy. E. As depicted on the Master Plan, Exhibit "A ", LBP has reserved a 200 -foot wide right - of -way along the southern property boundary, east of Livingston Road North/South, for the construction of Livingston Road East/West. Collier County will compensate the owner based on the fair market value at the time of acquisition. F. Connection permits shall be required for all temporary construction access points. Such permits shall require any necessary auxiliary lanes and apron paving to be constructed prior to the use of any temporary access point. 7.5 UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission systems shall be constructed throughout the project by LBP. Potable water and sanitary sewer facilities constructed within platted rights -of -way or within dedicated County utility easements shall be conveyed to Collier County, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance 97 -17, as amended, except as may be provided in Section 2.4 of this Document. B. Upon completion of the utility facilities, they shall be tested to insure they meet Collier County's utility construction requirements in effect at the time construction plans are approved. C. All customers connecting to the potable water and sanitary sewer system shall be customers of the County, except as may be provided in Section 2.4 of this document. D. Existing vegetation will be saved where possible; therefore, the County owned potable water mains and forcemains will be allowed to meander during construction to save vegetation. The meander will be accomplished by deflecting the pipe or using fittings in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Ordinance. For horizontal adjustments over 12 inches from the original alignment, an as -built survey of the utilities will be required and shown on the record drawings. E. Landscaping and sidewalks will be allowed within the right -of -way /County utility easement (R.O.W. /C.U.E.) and over the County owned potable water mains and forcemains. Small vegetation with unobtrusive root systems shall be allowed anywhere within the R.O.W. /C.U.E. For large vegetation and trees (palms and/or tap rooted trees), root guards will be installed to prevent roots from coming in contact with County owned potable water mains and forcemains. The Collier County Public 4125/2001- 52046 Ver: l0A- AlenMns 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,, Works Department will not be responsible for the repairs, replacement, maintenance or restoration of above - ground improvements or landscaping installed by LBP within the R.O.W. /C.U.E. The aforementioned costs shall be the sole financial responsibility of LBP, its successor and assigns. This clause will be shown within the homeowners' association documents and on the construction plans. F. The County owned potable water mains will end at the beginning of the cul -de -sac with a fire hydrant. Potable water services will be extended to serve residential lots along the cul -de -sac. Conduits will be provided for the potable water services, where necessary. G. For the County owned potable water mains and forcemains located within a 50 foot R.O.W. /C.U.E. serving single family residential parcels, the potable water main will be located a minimum 7.5 feet off the back of curb (BOC) and the forcemain will be located a minimum 5 feet off the BOC. The minimum distance from the BOC to the right -of -way line will be 13 feet. Reference the typical cross - section attached as Exhibit `D', Section A. H. For the County owned potable water mains located within a 40 foot R.O.W /C.U.E. serving single family residential parcels, the potable water main will be located a minimum 5.0 feet off the BOC. The minimum distance from the BOC to the right -of- way line will be 8 feet. Reference the typical cross - section attached as Exhibit `D', Section B. I. For the County owned potable water mains and forcemains located along the loop roadway, the potable water main will be located a minimum 7.5 feet off the BOC and the forcemain will be located a minimum 5 feet off the BOC. For the loop roadway section without a median, the minimum distance from the BOC to the right -of -way line will be 15 feet. For the loop roadway section with a median, the minimum distance from the BOC to the right -of -way shall be 13 feet. Reference the typical cross - section attached as Exhibit `D', Sections C & D. J. The County owned potable water distribution system will be allowed to connect to the Collier County potable water transmission system along the Livingston Road (East - West) corridor, if necessary, to enhance pressures and chlorine residuals within the Project. To assist the County's operation and maintenance activities, LBP will provide a stabilized access in areas where there is not paved access adjacent to the County owned potable water main. K. Collier County and LBP entered into a Utility Facilities Reimbursement and Contribution Agreement dated 12 January, 1999 to address the design, permitting and construction of utilities along Livingston Road from Immokalee Road to the Lee /Collier County Line. L. Irrigation water will be provided with a separate non - Collier County owned distribution system supplied by on -site wells, reclaimed water and/or other non - potable sources. 412512001- 52048 Ver: 10A- Menidne 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 16J1 ,< 7.6 WATER MANAGEMENT A. In accordance with the rules of the South Florida Water Management District, this Project shall be designed for a storm event of a 3 -day duration and 25 -year return frequency. B. The applicant is allowed to not provide 10 percent littoral zone planting within every lake provided that compensatory littoral plantings are provided in other interconnected lakes within the Project phase. The applicant will provide the required total littoral zone plantings that would be required for the Project. 7.7 ENVIRONMENTAL A. The Collier County `ST' overlay will be eliminated. A conservation easement will be provided for the proposed preservation areas per Section 6.4. Based upon final SFWMD permitting there may be some minor adjustments to the proposed preservation areas. B. In order to avoid repetitive review of environmental issues in subsequent stages of the County development approval process, upon approval of the Mediterra PUD, the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) submitted in conjunction with the application for public hearing for PUD Rezone shall serve as the EIS and the requirement for obtaining approval of an EIS pursuant to Division 3.8, Section 3.8.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code shall be deemed satisfied for all future activities which take place within the Mediterra PUD boundaries that require County permits for or County approval of development or site alteration. If the Preservation Areas' boundaries significantly change, the County may require additional information or an EIS supplement. C. Collier County shall defer environmental permitting regarding wetlands, wetland impacts and wetland mitigation to the SFWMD. LBP shall coordinate with and copy Collier County on approved permits. D. Location of gopher tortoise burrows and gopher tortoise relocation area(s) shall be indicated on the site development plans. A Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission Gopher Tortoise Relocation or "Incidental Take Permit" will be obtained prior to construction in areas where gopher tortoise burrows exist. E. All conservation areas shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or easements with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Conservation areas including those that are recorded on a plat shall be dedicated to LBP, their successor or assigns, or the Mediterra CDD for the responsibility of the control and maintenance of lands within the Preservation Area. F. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic free) plan for the site, with emphasis on the preservation areas, shall be submitted to Current Planning 412512001- 52048 Ver: 10A- AJenkine 02934- 007-001- ESSM- 22959 16J1 ,, Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. This plan shall include the methods and time schedule for removal of exotic vegetation within preservation areas. G. Petitioner shall comply with all permit conditions and stipulations contained within US Army Corps of Engineers and SFWMD permits issued for Mediterra which concern protected wildlife species. H. The Preservation Areas incorporate wetlands as well as buffers including upland and structural buffers. The Project will be consistent with SFWMD criteria including any wetland buffering requirements. For these reasons, no additional buffering contiguous to the Preservation Areas will be required. 4125/2007 - 52048 Vw: 10A- Menkirro 02934- 007 -001- ESBM- 22959 SECTION VIII CROSS JURISDICTIONAL PROVISIONS 8.1 PURPOSE 16J1 e, The purpose of this Section is to address and resolve potential inter jurisdictional issues related to Mediterra PUD resulting from its location in both Collier and Lee Counties, pursuant to meetings and coordination between staff of both Counties. 8.2 ADDRESSING A. As stated in Exhibit C - Letter dated February 19, 1998 from United States Postal Service Postmaster C. M. Kigin, the main entrance for Mediterra is located within Collier County and therefore mail for the entire project will be delivered by the Naples Post Office. B. As to streets and roadways within Mediterra PUD that cross the boundary between Lee and Collier Counties, LBP shall select the names of internal roadways and determine in both counties that the name selected for each roadway is available and reserved in each county for the roadway before requesting either county to assign street addresses or numbers to lots or parcels located on such internal roadways. C. Collier County and Lee County representatives have agreed to work cooperatively to ensure the assignment of consistent street names and addressing on all internal roads crossing the County boundary. 8.3 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES A. Fire suppression, law enforcement and emergency medical services shall be the responsibility of the county entity or service provider having jurisdiction over particular parcel or lot. 8.4 UTILITIES A. The plans for utilities serving the Mediterra PUD will be submitted for review and approval to the appropriate utility company that has jurisdiction over the subdivision improvements and/or golf course. 8.5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS The Development Review Process will be performed in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code and the Lee County Development Standards Ordinance. For subdivision improvements and/or golf courses that are located within both counties, the following will apply: - -- __ 6&2101 -62046 Ver: toe- AJenldne 02834- 007 -011- ESBM- 22959 - — - 16J1 „, A. For the portion of the subdivision improvements and/or golf course located within Collier County, the development plans and plats will be submitted to Collier County for review and approval. Likewise, for the portion of the same subdivision improvements and/or golf course located within Lee County, the development plans and plats will be submitted to Lee County for review and approval. B. Approval of subdivision improvements and/or golf course improvements within the jurisdiction of one County will not be contingent upon the review and approval of the County not having jurisdiction over the improvements. 8.6 PLATTING A. Individual residential lots shall be planned so that they are located in one county or the other. B. Plats for the Mediterra PUD shall be approved and recorded by each County for land located within its jurisdiction. C. Building permits for lots in one county within a platted subdivision severed by the county boundary shall not be issued by that county until the remaining portion of the subdivision located in the other county has been approved and recorded in accordance with the respective county subdivision plat ordinance and land development code. 4125!2001- 52046 Ver: 10A- AJenklne GAW 02934-007 -001- ESBM- 22959 SUE FILSON .� I B 6J Fiala Carter Henning AGENDA Mac'Kle Colette COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 5:05 P.M., WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2001, IN THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS TRAINING ROOM, MARTIN LUTHER ICING BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 3. CYCLE 2A — 2001 "SPECIAL" LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) AMENDMENT . e J. CCPC AGENDA/SMAo 1 Misc. Corres: Date: Item# Copies To: August ?A.4 T` TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, August 16, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:33 a.m. In REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: NOT PRESENT: Joyceanna J. Rautio Michael Pedone Dwight Richardson Lora Jean Young David J. Wolfley Russell A. Budd Kenneth L. Abernathy Russell A. Priddy ALSO PRESENT: Marjorie M. Student, Asst. County Attorney Susan Murray, Chief Planner, Planning Services Misc. Corres: Page 1 Date: Item# Copies To: August 16, X001 CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: I do believe we're live. Ladies and gentlemen, I would like to call the Collier County Planning Commission to order for August 16th, 2001. The first item on the agenda -- the first item on the agenda is roll call. Mr. Priddy, absent but excused. Mr. Budd, absent but excused. Mr. Richardson. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. Pedone. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Yeah. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Ms. Rautio, here. Ms. Young. COMMISSIONER YOUNG: Here. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. Wolfley. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: Here. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. Abernathy, absent but excused. We do have a quorum. Do we have any addenda to the agenda, Ms. Murray? MS. MURRAY: Good morning. Susan Murray, current planning manager. We have a couple of -- three changes, actually. The first two are Item 7 -C, which is noted on your agenda, is continued to the meeting of September 7th. Then staff is requesting to continue Item 7 -G, which is the variance request for Vanderbilt Villas. We're requesting to continue that to the meeting of 9/7. And then I understand Item 7 -F, there's a conflict, and I'd like the county attorney -- assistant county attorney to speak to that. MS. STUDENT: Okay. This is on the Indigo Lakes matter, which is Item F on the agenda under -- it would be 7 -F. And I have been advised -- and I need the commissioner to state for the record the nature of the conflict. But what -- on this item what will happen, then, is that he will not be able to take any action on the item. And Page 2 Augu #O.KOPI that means we don't have a quorum to take action on that item, and that will have to be continued. But I need him to state -- if he would, please, just state for the record the nature of the conflict. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: David Wolfley. For the record, my company has done business with the developer of Indigo Lakes, and there may be a potential conflict there. MS. STUDENT: That constitutes a voting conflict of interest. And even when the item comes up on the next agenda, he will also have to state it at that time, but hopefully we will have a quorum. So this results in the lack of a quorum, so I believe I will need the board to just make a motion to continue that item to the 7th meeting. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: He could not just abstain, and we still have five members? MS. STUDENT: We don't have a quorum. He can't vote on it because it is a voting conflict of interest, but we need five members to take official action on an item. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: So I need a motion to continue Item F, PUDZ - 2001 -AR -432, the Indigo Lakes PUD. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I make a motion we continue. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We have a motion. COMMISSIONER YOUNG: Second. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We have a motion by Mr. Pedone, a second by Ms. Young to continue the item until the September 7th meeting. Any discussion? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Just a quick discussion. Ms. Murray, I notice in looking at Item 7 -F -- just so that we don't have to waste time when it does come up -- that there's a great deal of detail that seems to be required by the applicant that's not provided, a whole list of things, you know, all the numbered items that show the sorts of things that needed -- are normally associated with the application that are missing in my packet. Page 3 Augu"sf 0,401 MS. MURRAY: Why don't I get with you after the meeting, Commissioner, and I'll go over that with you, and then we'll make sure you get that before the next meeting. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. So no further discussion? Call the question. All in favor, aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Those opposed, same sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Motion carries. Thank you. Any further addenda to the agenda? MS. MURRAY: No further. I'm sorry. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. The next item on the agenda is approval of the minutes. We have a June 21 st set of minutes, and I would just like to state that for consistency we want to have the cover page corrected. Do we have a motion to pass the minutes as corrected? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I'll make a motion that we pass the minutes of June 21 st as corrected. COMMISSIONER YOUNG: Second. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We have a motion by Mr. Pedone, a second by Ms. Young to pass the minutes of June 21 st with the minor correction of the cover page, which was vice - chairman instead of chairman. I guess I should put that on the record. All those in favor say aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Those opposed, same sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Motion carries. Thank you. Now, fourth item is Planning Commission absences. We have -- we know that Mr. Priddy, Abernathy, and Mr. Budd are absent for this Page 4 Au&ul 6W01 time. Do we have any planned absences in the near future? September 7th would be the next one, which is on a Friday. It's a different date due to a different conflict that we had, so it's on a Friday, not Thursday. MS. MURRAY: That's correct. And it's here in this boardroom on Friday, September 7th. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. No planned absences, and remember to come to this boardroom on Friday, not Thursday. We have one recap from the Board of County Commissioners for July 31 st. Susan, did you want to give us any highlights? MS. MURRAY: No, not unless you had any specific questions. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do any commissioners have questions? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Yes, if I may. I notice in the minutes of the meeting that I missed you covered the results from the Board of County Commissioners actions on the hearing examiner in particular, and at that time there were questions that were asked that you didn't have the answer to relating to ombudsman and some of the detail. And since I missed a good bit of that discussion, I would particularly appreciate finding out how we finally came out relative to which items the Planning Commission is still going to be in business on, because it seems that we're still going to be involved in some zoning issues that earlier we were going to be written off on. So however that sums out, I'd like to catch up on. MS. MURRAY: How about if I -- we have a summary sheet that's actually in -- in writing for you. How about if I go ahead and just make a note to bring that to the next meeting, or I could just mail it out to you, if you'd like, and you could -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: That would be fine. MS. MURRAY: -- read it. And then if you want to discuss it at the next meeting, we could do that. Page 5 Augu46J4 COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. Any further questions? Next item is the chairman's report. I would like to comment to our audience out there and those of us that are watching us on television that we do have three positions that will be up on the 1 st of October and that I believe the deadline for applications for appointment to this board by the Board of County Commissioners is this Friday, the 17th. So if anyone's listening to me that's interested in applying, please do SO. There seemed to be a lack of applications when I checked on Monday with Sue Filson in the commissioners' office, so I want to encourage people to apply so they can -- we can have a full complement to this board come the 1 st of October. Our enabling ordinance is a little different than some of the others that I've served on; therefore, a person does not continue to serve until replaced. They actually have to depart the board when their term expires, and we will need three new people come October 1 st. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Which districts are -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Those districts would be Mr. Budd, District 3; Mr. Priddy, District 5 -- and there are a couple of applications for that; and then I believe Mr. Wrage's vacant seat will be considered on the 11 th of September at the Board of County Commissioners; and then Mr. Pedone, District 1. Are you going to reapply, Mr. Pedone? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: No, I'm not. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. Long service on this board. Okay. That's the end of my report. We are at Item No. 7, advertised public hearings. The first item will be BD -2001 -AR -619, a boat dock extension on Keewaydin Island. All those wishing to give testimony, please stand, raise your right and, and be sworn in by the court reporter. Page 6 August ]6; 2J� (The speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Good morning, Mr. Gochenaur. MR. GOCHENAUR: Good morning, Madam Commissioner. For the record, Ross Gochenaur, planning services. The petitioner is requesting a 63 -foot extension to create a docking facility protruding a total of 83 feet into a waterway which is about 400 feet wide. The property's located on Keewaydin Island and contains about 102 feet. of water frontage. The project consists of the construction of a dock with one boat lift and one additional slip. There is a single - family home on the property. No objections to this petition have been received. The project meets all criteria, and staff recommends approval. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do we have any questions of staff? Would the petitioner care to talk for a moment until the quorum comes back? MR. SCOFIELD: For the record, Rocky Scofield representing the petitioner. Do you have any questions? This is an existing dock on Kee Island. Ms. Ferrone, Jean Ferrone, owns it. She lives -- she actually lives full time on the island. And there's an existing dock there which we're removing, and we're replacing it with one that's a little bit longer. The new dock going in is going to be 11 feet further out than the existing dock, but then the extra 20 feet is for mooring pilings outside of that. And we're going to put a boat lift on the inside. They have a small boat, and then they're going to have a little bit larger boat that they'll moor on the outside between the end of the dock and the mooring piles. We're allowed to go out a little bit further. This is in the aquatic preserve, so we're allowed to go out to minus 4 feet mean low water, according to the DEP rules and regulations. So that's how we were able to extend the dock out 11 more feet. If you have any questions, I'd -- or do you want me to keep talking? Page 7 CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. Richardson. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I noticed in some of the in the last meeting there was some discussion about removal of the exotics and whether that was required or not. And can you tell us what the situation is on this particular site? MR. SCOFIELD: Well, on this site, there's an existing home. They do live there full time. So the only time the exotic removal comes in is when you are going in to develop or place a home on that -- on that lot or if we have a substantial impact through the mangroves to put a boardwalk through, then that kicks in also to remove the exotics. This one the dock just goes right up to the shoreline. There is no mangrove forest on this. It's just a beach right there. So they would have been required a long time ago to remove those. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do we have any registered public speakers? MS. MURRAY: No registered speakers. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Are there any other questions from the commission? I close the public hearing. What's the pleasure of the board? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Madam Chairman, I'd recommend that we approve this BD- 2001 -AR -619 and forward it to the Board of County Commissioners. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: Second. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. We have a motion by Mr. Richardson, a second by Mr. Wolfley for approval of the petition. Any discussion? All those in favor say aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Those opposed, same sign. (No response.) Page 8 August �2�0� CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Motion carries. Thank you. The next item on the agenda is another boat dock extension on Keewaydin Island, BD -2001 -AR -928. Mr. Gochenaur, your turn again. That's right. We probably would like to swear you in. All those wishing to speak, please raise your right hand and swear before the clerk of the courts. (The speakers were sworn.) MR. GOCHENAUR: For the record, Ross Gochenaur, planning services. The petitioner is requesting a 235 -foot extension to create a docking facility protruding a total of 255 feet into a waterway which is about 420 feet wide. The property is located on Keewaydin Island and contains about 111 feet of water frontage. The project consists of the construction of a dock with one boat lift and mooring pilings at the terminal end to accommodate a second vessel. Although the protrusion is measured from the most restricted point as 255 feet, only the last 80 feet would protrude beyond the mangroves into the actual waterway. There is no residence on the property; however, the Land Development Code allows docks as a permitted principal use on unbridged barrier islands such as Keewaydin. We've received no objection, and staff recommends approval. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do we have any questions of staff? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: It's always eye - popping to see such a big number, 235 -foot extension, when 20 feet is usually -- but I recognize the situation here, and I guess we're going to have a pattern of these any time those are developed in that area. MR. GOCHENAUR: Yes, pretty much. The situation is similar for most of the properties on Keewaydin. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. Scofield, would you care to comment? MR. SCOFIELD: Rocky Scofield, for the record. I just -- one comment on that. Ross and I just talked about this, the staff report. Page 9 When -- and I made the comment it always says -- when you read the first sentence, it says 255 feet into the waterway. Well, it's actually not into the waterway. But if you read a little further, it explains that. But that's what -- if you read that, a lot of times you'll stop -- and I know I did a couple of times -- without reading further. And into the waterway, the dock is only out 64 feet into the waterway, and then we have, 20 feet further out, the mooring piles to tie the boat off. So it is a staggering figure when you first look at it, read the first sentence. It's 171 feet of boardwalk through the mangroves. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Any other questions of staff? Do we have any registered public speakers? MS. MURRAY: No registered speakers. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: With no speakers, we close the public hearing. What's the pleasure of the board? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I'd like to make a motion that we approve Petition BD- 2001 -AR -928 subject to the stipulations. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: Second. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We have a motion by Mr. Pedone, a second by Mr. Wolfley to approve the petition. Do we have any discussion? Hearing no discussion, I call the question. All those in favor say aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Those opposed, same sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Motion carries. Thank you. The next item on the agenda was continued, so we're at D, PUDA- 2000 -AR- 500 (sic), a rezone for Falling Waters Beach Resort PUD. All those wishing to give testimony today, please stand, raise your right hand, and be sworn in by the court reporter. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: The applicant's in the hallway. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Mr. Anderson should be Page 10 here. His time's up. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: They did not realize that the item before that was continued. That's why they were in the hallway. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: That's why they're in the hallway? Well, we'll go ahead and -- (Woman in audience speaking.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: You can only speak from the microphones. I'm sorry. Okay. All those wishing to give testimony, please raise your right hand and be sworn in by the clerk of the courts. (The speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. And for those of you who do wish to speak, please make sure that you fill out a speaker slip and give it to Ms. Murray up here at the front so we have a record of your names and addresses. MS. MURRAY: And, Madam Chair, you may want to remind the audience if you have a cell phone, that if you would, please turn those off or put those on vibrate so it's not disruptive to your public hearing. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: All pagers and cell phones need to be in the vibrate position or turned off. And each person has an opportunity of about five minutes to speak, and we'd like to hear new information from each speaker, if possible. Okay. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Good morning, Commissioners. Chahram Badamtchian from planning services staff. Bruce Anderson, representing the purchasers of this tract within the Falling Waters PUD, are requesting a PUD amendment in order to remove some of the existing uses -- approved uses and add one new use. The uses that are being deleted include restaurants, fast -food restaurants, food markets, and automobile service stations. The use that's been added is self - storage use. Page 11 Augus��/1/3 Some other changes, they are reducing the maximum height from 50 feet to 36 feet, increasing the building area from 49,000 to 73,000, and reducing the front setback from 50 to 20. These changes will reduce the amount of traffic that could have been generated if permitted uses were not removed. This will reduce the traffic by 4400 trips per day. They are reducing the front setback because when this PUD was approved, the county -- they owned this parcel of land here, but the county came later and purchased the 50 -foot strip for road widening. That's why these monument signs, these big large monuments, which are cascading water monuments -- block, granite, whatever they are -- they are right at the property line. They were built with the 50 -foot setback, but now they are right on the property line. That's why the applicant is requesting to reduce this to 20. Even with this reduced setback, as you can see, the buildings are going to be 20 feet further back than those monument signs. The commercial tract and residential tracts, they share the same entrance. There's only one entrance from 951, which will be shared by the residents and the commercial tract. That makes it difficult for any substantial commercial development there because of the number of trips that commercial tracts may generate. That's why staff is supporting this change and removing all those uses and adding self - storage. Self - storage is going to generate the least amount of traffic. And as you can see from this -- let me orient -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Are we having trouble with our visuals? MS. MURRAY: Sorry about that. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Sorry. And this commercial tract which is located in here is within -- within Activity Center No. 18, which allows a full array of commercial uses, and there are commercial developments in the area. And this property's bordered by Marco Island Water Treatment Plant to the north, which will not Page 12 AugusflV, 4dJ be developed in a residential or commercial way. It is a water treatment plant. And basically they have tried to transition from higher commercial to storage to a water treatment plant. Based on this staff recommends approval of this request. Staff has received around 26 letters of opposition. Around 25 of them are attached to your petition -- to your packet. The rest were received after the packet was mailed. They basically all say the same thing. They are opposed to the reduction of the setback, and they basically don't want more traffic in the area. And they don't want an increase of the commercial area's square footage from 49,000 to 73,000. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: I have a question. With reference to the concept of reducing the maximum height from 50 to 36, it would appear, then, that that's a trade -off to give additional -- another 24,000 square feet of commercial space. Is that something that's done very often in the county? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: It depends on the use. In here the trade -off is that even by increasing the area of commercial, they are reducing the traffic. Basically the traffic generated by this will be, as I said, 4400 less than if they developed these tracts with gas stations and restaurants, which are permitted uses. And reducing the height, they don't really need the height for a ministorage building, so that's why they are reducing, to reduce the visual impact for the residents in the area in the residential tract, so they don't see the roof of the 50- foot high building. And I think it's a fair trade. And one more thing, they don't need as many parking spaces as a restaurant or gas station would need. So instead of having a big building with a large parking lot, they are asking for a larger building. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. So we're reducing the heighth because self - storage is generally not something that you want a 50 -foot building for, and they're requesting additional square footage. And you're saying that that, in itself, will give a different visual Page 13 Augusti"1 impact, and those are -- and in addition to that, the reduction of traffic is why staff is recommending approval. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: The reduction of traffic is the main thing. Since they are sharing the same access with the residential tract in the back, which they will have -- when finished they will have around 430 units, they will share the same access to the site. That's why it's important to reduce the amount of traffic that these commercial tracts are going to generate. That's why staff is supporting this. This is going to generate the least amount of traffic. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. Now, the other aspect of this that so many people did mention was the 20 -foot minimum setback. Would you clarify for me, once again, what that visually does? And you say the county bought 50 feet of right -of -away, so we lost a lot of right -of -way -- I mean, they lost their setback, Falling Waters did? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Originally -- I don't know exactly where the property line used to be -- it used to be 50 feet from this line here. And the county came and purchased 50 feet of right -of -way from Falling Waters Beach Resort, and that used to be the setback. That's why these two structures are right now on the property line, because they were built with 50 -foot setbacks. Once the county purchased that, that reduced the amount of land that can be developed. That's why they have already lost 50 feet of land. They don't want another 50 -foot setback. That's why they are requesting a 20 -foot setback. And usually setbacks in commercial tracts are used for parking. And in here there's no need for parking, not as many parking spaces as a commercial -- traditional commercial development would need. That's why they are asking to reduce the setback and build the building closer to the road. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: So the corollary of that, if this commission decides that we want to stay with the 50 -foot setback, Page 14 Augu�o,, JJ they would still -- they would lose about 30 square feet -- 30 feet all the way down the property on the front. They could not have a building on that 30 feet. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: That will -- this being 20, that will bring them to somewhere in here. They will lose substantial amount of building. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Did anyone calculate the loss of that square footage? I guess that would be something we'll ask the petitioner. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: The applicants probably have the number. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: I just wanted to be clear why you were supporting the specific aspects of it. Do we have other questions of staff? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: If I may. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. Richardson. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: First of all, the geographic location, the west east side of Collier Boulevard, I was puzzled by that. I'm not sure how to read west east when it's all on one side of the road. That may just be -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: I'm sorry. It's on the east side of Collier Boulevard. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Okay. In terms of the -- of this application, which is a replacement PUD as I understand it, this replaces the old PUD. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Correct. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I don't have a strike and underline to indicate that. We had asked for that sort of thing to be provided to us so that we can really see what the changes are. But on the basis of what you've provided us, you know, this idea that the county came along and just took this land, the developer was Page 15 August J01 enriched by this, was he not? He was paid for the property? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: I believe they were paid, yes. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Was it donated? We'll find that out I guess, but I suspect it was purchased. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: It was purchased. Correct. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So, you know, to come along now and say that they need to have a variance of the PUD to reduce it from 50 down to 20, you know, it's in the guise of a new PUD, but it's really a variance that they're coming in for. And with that variance they're able to put a bigger footprint on the property, the commercial property that's there. I have some real problems with us providing this kind of a relief. So I offer that as comment. We'll have to hear what the applicant has to say, but I question your judgment in -- in granting this kind of a variance. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I have a question. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. Pedone. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Yes. Was the selling of that piece of property, that 50 foot, in lieu of an eminent domain for the widening of County Road 951? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Maybe Bruce Anderson can answer that question in detail. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Before we get to the applicant -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Save that question. Mr. Richardson. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: The open space requirements, 30 percent, can you -- is that tracked by tract, or is that MR. BADAMTCHIAN: No. That's for the entire PUD. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: The entire PUD? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Yes. That's how we measure for PUDs. Page 16 COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well, it doesn't seem to say that in the notes here. It says the said amount of open space is equal to the open space requirement of 30 percent for commercial and industrial PUDs. So I would assume that would mean just the commercial portion of this PUD. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: For mixed -use PUDs, the Land Development Code says we go with the commercial open space requirements. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Okay. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: So all they have to do is provide 30 percent open space for the entire PUD. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: For the entire PUD? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Yes. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So you're going to -- they can cram it all on the front end, then, and pick it up in some water management areas in the back. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: That's the way our Land Development Code reads, yes. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: That doesn't seem -- it doesn't seem to follow the intent of what the -- our Land Development Code is trying to prescribe. We're trying to get a balance of open space on all the structures within the buildings that take place within a PUD. And what we're being asked to look at is a -- taking a vacant piece and making it, you know, brutally intense by -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Commissioner Richardson -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: -- giving a variance allowing for -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: -- I understand that. But, like, in Pelican Marsh, they have tracts built with 20, 22 units per acre. They don't have any open space. And on the other side of Airport Road, Page 17 Augusll6i;4 which is still the same PUD, they have a large golf course. And the average is 60 percent open space, but it doesn't go tract by tract. It's for the entire development. That's how it was interpreted in the past, and that's how our Land Development Code reads. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well, maybe it's something that this board needs to revisit as we go down the line in considering Land Development Code changes, because I don't think it achieves the purpose that we want to see. And this is a good example. It's all crammed up in the front, and I think it's going to create a real hardship for the people that are there. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Any other questions from staff at the moment? Mr. Wolfley. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: Well, this seems to be -- the Land Development Code seems to be rather dynamic at this point. And, I mean, when a developer can purchase a piece of property 20 miles away to get a higher density in a property or PUD they're working on, I don't really see where that differs much from an overall density of the whole project, in exact opposition of what was just said. MS. MURRAY: If I might add a little bit of perspective to that, when you're designing a site, of course there's many factors you have to take into account, and one most important one is some of the environmental considerations. When you start regulating the exact location of open space, you would run into issues -- I mean, this is just off the top of my head here. There's plenty of other issues I could bring up. One of the most important issues, of course, you would run into is some of your environmental considerations and your permitting requirements. So just something to keep in the back of your mind. If you want to discuss it through the LDC cycle or through a workshop or something, we can certainly do that and bring you a little bit more detail in terms of open space and why it's Page 18 AugusY1V401fi calculated the way it is and where it's located and why and some of the impacts of adjusting the Land Development Code to force open space in very specific locations. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Before we have any more questions, I did want to ask, Marjorie, we had asked before when we do a repeal, as Mr. Richardson pointed out, of a PUD and bring another one forward, that we were going to have the strikethroughs so we can see the comparisons. Is that -- MS. STUDENT: Yeah. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: -- too huge of a document to give us? MS. STUDENT: I don't know. Usually that's what -- staff usually prepares it that way so you know. But, in fact, what really happens in the final product is really the new PUD document because, in fact, the -- it is a new PUD document. I don't know how it may have been that that wasn't provided for you in your backup. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: We usually do when we do a PUD amendment to show the changes, but in here we are basically repealing the PUD and adopting a brand -new PUD. MS. MURRAY: We can provide it if -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: We can provide -- MS. MURRAY: -- you would prefer. It's probably my oversight, and I apologize. We can provide that for PUD rezones as well. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. MS. STUDENT: And I just wanted to state something, too, more or less for the record, that I believe there are some uses that are changed from this -- in this PUD from the previous, and Florida does not permit use variances. Those things must always be accomplished by rezone. Other jurisdictions do permit use variances, but in Florida they are prohibited. So I just wanted to state that for the record because I believe somebody mentioned something in terms of a Page 19 August 6Jol variance so .... COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Marjorie, I wasn't questioning about the change in uses. I was questioning about the setbacks. MS. STUDENT: I see. Okay. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: And that setback is clearly a -- I would view it as a variance request, at least. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Chahram, do you have -- Ms. Young, questions? COMMISSIONER YOUNG: You are increasing the commercial building areas from 49,000 square feet to 73,000 square feet. What is the justification for that? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: The justification is the main objective here is to reduce the traffic. By not allowing gas stations and restaurants and allowing storage, we are reducing the traffic by -- or the applicants are proposing to reduce the traffic by 4400 trips a day. That's a major reduction in traffic, so in exchange for that, they want a larger building. Basically, it's one of those things that they give something, and in exchange they want something else. And I believe it's a fair trade since, as I said, one access point to 951 is going to be the only access for the residential and commercial. The main objective should be to reduce the amount of traffic as much as we can. If this wasn't the case, if the commercial tract had its own access to 951 or the Collier Boulevard, staff would not be recommending approval of this PUD. We are recommending approval because that's the only access. If we can reduce the traffic on that small segment of drive -- the road by 4400 trips a day, that's a major reduction for the people living in this development. COMMISSIONER YOUNG: However, you realize that most of the people who have written letters of objection to this are bringing up that very point, the real -- really intense enlargement of Page 20 Augusf1o, M04 commercial activity -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Yes. I realize that. COMMISSIONER YOUNG: -- on a very congested boulevard. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: I realize that. But I also realize that the number of people who objected is roughly 10 percent of the unit owners. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Any other questions? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Just one final question. In the -- since I don't have the strikethroughs, looking at Section 3 of the PUD -- the new PUD, the minimum yards, was that the language that was in the original PUD, or is this now what they're asking as part of the new PUD? If that's always been there, then they didn't need to come here, for the variance at least. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Section 3? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: 3.4 -D. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. Richardson, it's not a variance. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well, it's effectively a variance. It's effectively a variance. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: No. It basically says abutting Collier Boulevard 20 feet. It used to say abutting Collier Boulevard 50 feet. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: It should say 50 feet? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: It used to say. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Oh, it used to say. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: The old PUD document says 50; the new says 20. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So if we were given a strikethrough, this would have shown 50, and then we could see that it's 20 now. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Yes. MS. MURRAY: That's correct. That was also summarized in your staff report. As well, let me just also point out to you, just for Page 21 Augl"1q 1 your information and consideration, that the front yard setback in the C -4 zoning district is 25 feet or one -half of the building height, whichever is greater. In this case you told me the building height was going to be 36 feet -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Thirty -six. MS. MURRAY: -- which would be 16 (sic), so the required setback would be 25 feet front yard. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: That's if this were going in asaC -- MS. MURRAY: C -4. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: And that's not the case. We're talking about PUD, which is a contract between the county and the developer for some special considerations which we balance out. MS. MURRAY: That's correct. I just wanted you to have the information so you would realize the difference between if this was a straight zoned parcel or C -4 zoned parcel and they were coming in for a conditional use for a storage facility, what they would be required to build at versus what they're asking within the PUD. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Just didn't want us to be misled, though, by the conditions we're really faced with in this case. MS. MURRAY: No. Me neither. That's why I wanted to give you that information. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Chahram, are you finished with your presentation now -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: I believe I am, yes. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: -- that we've distracted you with lots of questions? Okay. Would the petitioner care to present? MR. ANDERSON: Good morning, Madam Chairman, Members of the Commission. My name is Bruce Anderson, and I represent the applicant. I'd like to introduce Dave Cheslyn, vice president from Skinner & Broadbent Company; and Bruce Tyson of Page 22 AuguJI0,4A1 WilsonMiller, who's the project planner; and Dan Johnson, who's the project engineer with WilsonMiller. We're all here to answer any questions that you might have. I want to be real clear about what the choices are here today. The choice is between 49,000 square feet of intensive commercial uses, including fast -food restaurants set back 10 feet from the new 951 right -of -way line, which -- and these uses will generate approximately 3500 vehicle trips per day by cars and semis serving the numerous businesses located on the property. Or the other choice, the one we propose today, is 73,000 square feet of enclosed self - storage with a caretaker's apartment set back 20 feet from the new 951 right -of -way line. And this use will generate only approximately 175 vehicle trips per day. Additionally, the building height is proposed to be reduced from 50 feet to 36 feet to allow for the office and caretaker's apartment. Otherwise, the storage buildings themselves are limited to one story. Now, I'll admit I'm biased, but it sure seems like a commonsense choice to me. Would you rather have a single use that generates 175 trips per day or an assortment of uses that generate more than 3500 trips per day? Make no mistake. Those are the choices before you today. The PUD allows as a matter of right, without any public hearing, fast -food restaurants, other kinds of restaurants, grocery stores, and other miscellaneous retail uses. This PUD amendment eliminates those uses and substitutes self - storage in its place. Not only does this PUD amendment dramatically decrease by more than 90 percent the amount of traffic to be generated by the retail uses that are already allowed, there is also a more - than -90- percent reduction in the demand on the county's water and sewer system by a self - storage use as compared to these other retail uses that could be built there today. These are real and substantial public benefits and benefits to the neighboring residents that would result from approval of this PUD amendment. Page 23 Augusl"l I'd also point out in response to one of the questions that Mr. Commissioner Richardson had, when you compare the self - storage use to the retail uses that could be built there today and you compare the decrease in the amount of asphalt area needed for parking as compared to the amount of asphalt area needed for parking for a 49,000- square -foot shopping center, there is no change in the amount of greenspace available. My client and I have worked closely with the residents of Falling Waters. We have met with their group twice to explain the project, answer their questions, and receive their input and address their concerns. In response to the requests from residents, we have modified landscape plans, reduced our signage, and agreed to a monument sign. We have decreased our storage space in order to increase internal vehicle turnaround areas, and we agreed to install a light at or near the property line at the northern end of where our property abuts the remainder of the PUD in order to provide a safety light in a darkened corner along their interior roadway. Even before this petition was filed, my client and I worked to anticipate and address in advance the concerns that residents of Falling Waters might have. As examples, we oriented the buildings so that the access to the self - storage unit is only from an internal courtyard so that no exterior doors are visible, either from the Falling Waters' residents or from 951. The plan also chose to propose stucco buildings and a barrel tile roof on the two -story office in order to blend with the structures that already exist in Falling Waters. Lastly, I'd like to address myself to the phantom issue of a setback reduction along the 951 right -of -way. Although I use the term phantom, it is completely understandable how someone could be confused. It is a little complicated, but the bottom line is that we are changing -- that although we are changing the language in the PUD to Page 24 AuguJ1N461 provide for a 20 -foot setback rather than a 50 -foot setback, the reality is that we are increasing from 10 to 20 foot the amount of setback that would be required on this property by the Land Development Code. Let me explain. When the Falling Waters PUD was originally approved, it contained a future requirement that the developer had to convey to the county, whenever the county was ready for it, up to 50 feet of right -of -way along the east side of County Road 951. And in connection with that 50 -foot dedication requirement, the county also imposed a 50 -foot setback requirement from the then - existing right - of -way for 951. The purpose in doing that was to guarantee that no buildings or other structures would have to be removed when the 50 foot was eventually conveyed to Collier County. That 50 feet has been conveyed to Collier County. And, as Chahram told you, the Falling Waters entry signs are placed at the edge of the new right -of- way sign (sic). Section 2.1.13 of the Land Development Code provides that where land that was to be used to satisfy setback requirements is conveyed for a public use, the minimum setback is also reduced by the same amount as the land conveyed for the public use, except that a minimum front yard setback of 10 feet must be provided. Under this section, in the case of Falling Waters, that would mean when the original 50 -foot setback area was conveyed to the county for 951 right -of -way, the buildings would have to be set back 10 feet only from the new right -of -way line. Our PUD amendment proposes to increase that setback from 10 feet to 20 feet, measured from the new right -of -way line. Our buildings would be set back 20 feet from behind where the Falling Waters monument signs begin. Let me try to explain that. I see some -- it is complicated. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: But, however, I guess the point I Page 25 Augusdl6[E!W missed earlier, Mr. Anderson, was is from -- staff did not tell us that this dedication of right -of -way, the 50 foot to the county, was part of the PUD from the very beginning. MR. ANDERSON: Well, and you wouldn't know that because you didn't get a strikethrough and highlight version where we took that out and restated that it had already been conveyed. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Right. And it does make a big difference, as you are presenting at this point, for all the discussion we had earlier. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: If I just -- since I brought up that issue, just for my clarification, and I'll ask staff. They could - - they can -- based upon the existing PUD, if they hadn't come in for a change, they could put a building 10 foot from the property line? MS. MURRAY: That's correct. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Then the strikethrough -- or what I have that says 20 feet, you're saying that's just a generosity on their part, then. MS. MURRAY: It's an increase of 10 feet over the minimum 10 feet that they're required today to build to. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So the other assortment of uses that they're currently permitted to do based on the previous contract on the PUD could come in at the 10 -foot mark. MS. MURRAY: That's correct. Today. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Such as a fast -food restaurant. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well, I'm not against assortment of uses. I'm not -- you know, that's a marketing question. And I'm not sure that the people that live out there would object to having some additional amenities available to them, so I'm not sure how strong that argument is. MR. ANDERSON: That's for you to decide. MS. MURRAY: I just want to apologize on behalf of staff. I Page 26 AuguJIF 41 think that there was just -- I personally didn't know the history of the dedication of the roadway, and it wasn't obvious in our presentation. But Mr. Anderson is correct in his statements. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: That certainly clarifies, in my mind, a number of things on the right -of -way issue. You can continue, Mr. Anderson. MR. ANDERSON: Thank you. As a result of our good neighbor outreach efforts to the residents of Falling Waters, yesterday I received by e -mail a letter of no objection from the boards of directors of the Phases 1, 2, and 3 homeowners' associations, which I will distribute and make a part of the record. We appreciate the support of these neighbors. I do want to clarify one statement that is in their letter of no objection. It says there will be a minimum 6 -foot hedge around the building. That 6 -foot hedge is on the side of the building that faces the residents of Falling Waters. It's only a 3 -foot hedge adjacent to 951. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Is that not a safety issue? MR. ANDERSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: The 3 -foot hedge. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. And that's what's required by the county's code. And I -- like I said, I'll distribute copies of the letter of no objection and give one to the court reporter. And if there are any other questions, I or -- you need another one? We'll be glad to try to answer them. And I would request the opportunity to respond to any public comments. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Mr. Anderson, I only have one other comment. My document looks like it came out of war time. It has a lot of blackouts in it. Was there something in there that I should be interested in? MR. ANDERSON: No. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: It's not -- it doesn't bear on Page 27 AuguSl16l1 -- it doesn't bear on the issue at all? MR. ANDERSON: No. What's blanked out there are dollars. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: You might be of interest (sic), but you're not going to get that information. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: It's not a requirement to have complete documents provided to us? MR. ANDERSON: You have a complete document. You have confidential information that has been excised out. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: How would I know that? MR. ANDERSON: Because I just told you, and I'm under oath. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. We do have registered speakers? MS. MURRAY: Yes. The first speaker is Joe Geoffroy. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Please state your name for the record, and it does help if you include your address. MR. GEOFFROY: Good morning. My name is Joe Geoffroy. I live at 6650 Beach Resort Drive. I have some concerns with the building, mainly the traffic congestion that will arise from the trucks, cars, and trailers exiting and -- and entering the -- also the traffic from over 400 residents coming and going on County Road 951 and also 41, which has been designated the fifth most dangerous corner in Collier County. I feel that if this project does go through, a curb cut is essential so that the congestion burden can be held to a minimum. What I'm saying by that is that if they were to enter our entrance and go out the back and was able to get a curb cut, I think that would alleviate a lot of problems. I don't know if -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Could I ask a question? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Yes. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'm not sure -- you mean some other entrance and exit onto -- or exit onto 951? Page 28 Augusfl0, 2IX1 MR. GEOFFROY: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So they would go -- MR. GEOFFROY: They would come in and then go out the back way of that property. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Has staff taken a look at that? Is that a possibility? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Russ Muller is here, but I believe this is a limited access road, 951, and the Growth Management Plan doesn't allow us to provide additional access points. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: You can continue. We'll talk about that a little more. MR. GEOFFROY: Okay. When we purchased our condo, we were given a set of documents containing the rules and regulations. When I read Exhibit 7 on page 2 -- I'd like to pass them out. I don't know when this was changed, and I'd like to have somebody clarify -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: You can just hand it to him and then go back to the mike. Thank you. MR. GEOFFROY: I know that the PUD was changed, but we weren't notified. It says, "Commercial property shall mean and refer to all commercial property within the Falling Waters Beach Resort Planned Unit Development; however, under no circumstances shall convenience stores /gas stations be constructed or maintained within the Falling Waters Beach Resort Planned Unit Development." I know this might be old, but people continue to get these documents. When are we going to be told of the correct ones? MS. STUDENT: For the record, Marjorie Student, assistant county attorney. These documents do not emanate from the county. The condo documents emanate from -- I don't know if the developer still has control or if the association itself now has control of the condo, but I would suspect that the developer /property owner originally prepared those documents. That's a private matter, and the Page 29 Augusl6/1/0l county does not enforce or really have anything to do with those private docs that exist between the original developer of the property and the people that purchase the condos in the property. I would point out, however, that this is a change. And those uses, as I understand it, that you referenced in the docs are not going to be a part of this development so -- you referenced, I believe, gas station and -- MR. GEOFFROY: Yes. And I was told that because of the Marco water supply, gas stations were not allowed on that north end. MS. STUDENT: And I believe prior to this amendment, that a full range of commercial uses were going to be -- could have been permitted there. But as a result of this amendment, it's going to be limited to the self - storage facility. And I would also point out that our Comprehensive Plan calls -- which controls all development in the county and was adopted back in 1988 and approved by the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, that sets up that corner as an activity center. And in the county activity centers were where the commercial development was to be funneled. And you get into some issues when you deal with deed restrictions vis -a -vis zoning, and there's case law about that, and it's a rather complicated area. But I don't believe that anything that's being done here today, really, is not, you know, in -- or isn't in line with what you have in your docs. MR. GEOFFROY: So our documents here is not a true representation of how -- when we purchased our property. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: It may not be; however -- MS. STUDENT: That's a matter between -- MR. GEOFFROY: It's a matter between the developer and -- MS. STUDENT: The developer. That's correct. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: It's not under our purview at this point, but I would suggest you go to your board of directors and carry on Page 30 AugusTl6JUT that conversation with them. MR. GEOFFROY: Okay. I would like to just say that if someone could just check into a curb cut for this property, I think that this would alleviate a lot of hardship for all the residents in Falling Waters. I mean, we're going to be -- you're going to have tractor - trailer trucks coming in there and you're going to have -- they're going to be trying to enter and exit in two different directions. It's going to be -- it's going to be a circus. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. MR. GEOFFROY: Thank you very much for your time. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Next speaker. MS. MURRAY: Gerry Krisanda. Following Gerry will be Vincent Mattaliano. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: And if Vincent would step up and be ready to speak, that would be helpful. And you need to -- if you have a slip, please bring it to Ms. Murray up here. MS. KRISANDA: My name is Gerry Krisanda. I'm a resident of Falling Waters. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Would you spell that. MS. KRISANDA: K- r- i- s- a- n -d -a. 6560 Beach Resort Drive, No. 3. I am a resident. I'm not on the board of directors. I just wanted to express my opposition to this, and I would just question, where are they getting the figures, the 3500 trips that the present usage would -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. -- Chahram. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: I can answer that. It's not the traffic generated by the residential development at this point. That number is if the commercial tracts are developed with permitted uses, that's how many trips they would generate. MS. KRISANDA: I know. But, I mean, do you just pull these figures out of the air? Page 31 Au8u3 MWI MR. BADAMTCHIAN: No, ma'am. We have -- there is a way of doing the calculations. MS. KRISANDA: There's formulas, but you really don't know. Anyway, it is a real problem. I -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: There's a manual. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: One at a time, please. MS. KRISANDA: I don't know if you understand how this is going to work. When the trucks come in or the people come in for their storage units, they are going to cut across our exit way. I mean, it's not just they're going to have a straight shot. They're going to cut across this way. Our -- we will be coming out in this direction. They're going to be cutting across to go into the units on the left. When they come in, also they can go to the right. There's going to be more storage units on the right. Possibly they can travel from this section, go across our incoming and outgoing traffic to go to the other side. I mean, it just -- on paper it doesn't look bad, but when you go there and you see what we have to put up with, I mean, it's -- it's very discouraging. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I have a question. What -- what kind of a traffic problem do you think you would have with people going into a Kentucky Fried Chicken and an Arby's? MS. KRISANDA: Honestly, I can't see that a Kentucky Fried Chicken would want to share an entranceway. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: There is that possibility. If you're zoned for that -- let me finish. MS. KRISANDA: I know. I know. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: If you're zoned for that right now, you could have Kentucky Fried Chicken. You can have a hardware store, maybe, or a dentist and doctors' offices or whatever they want to put there. You're going to generate traffic either way. Wouldn't it be better to have the less of the two evils where you're Page 32 AuguJl0,4A going to have less traffic rather than more traffic? MS. KRISANDA: That's how it's been presented to everybody, but I honestly don't think that a business would want to share -- this is an aging community that we live in. There's going to be approximately 450 units. I mean, and we're -- people are coming and going all day, and I don't see where a businessman would want his -- his business located in there. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: What would you suggest they do with that property? MS. KRISANDA: Sell it to the residents. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Sell it to the residents, and you would make it into a nice treed area and have a nice entry and not worry about -- MS. KRISANDA: Which would certainly enhance 951. I mean, if you travel north on -951,- it's beautiful up- there- -I mean, there's some very, very expensive homes up there, golf courses. Well, anyway, thank you. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. Next speaker would be? MS. MURRAY: Vincent Mattaliano followed by Margaret Mattaliano. MS. MATTALIANO: May I speak first? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: No. We're -- you need to give your slips here to Ms. Murray, and then ask her -- right. She needs to call -- bring them to her. MR. MATTALIANO: Could you swear me in, please? I was in the rest room. (The speaker was sworn.) MR. MATTALIANO: Vincent Mattaliano, 6610 Beach Resort Drive. I don't know if yous could see the entrance that we're talking about. Right now that's fine at this time of the year. But when we have everyone here and everything is finished with 450 residents, Page 33 Au si b plus, they said, 800, what are they going to do? Allow once a week that you could go into there? Suppose most of these people are starting to come in at one time. Right now there's times when, even though it's not the busy time, that we get stuck out in traffic, and we're waiting on the side to pull in. And there's not a lot of traffic. This isn't the busy time of the year. This is 951. Yesterday they had a car overturned right on the corner. I mean, this is a very, very bad section. Are we going to make it worse? I mean, we have elderly people that are there. They're not going to move as fast as maybe young people or drive as fast. We're going to create such a hazard. I mean, it's going to be on people's heads. People are going to get killed on this corner waiting to walk into -- drive into an area that is so small now. There's only two cars going in. The ones on the left have to wait until they are checked -in because they're coming in -to see -- you know, see somebody so they park there. Now this is stopped. You only have one lane. You don't have two lanes anymore. That one side is completely stopped. And so the guard at the gate checks them in and calls and finds out where this person's going or this truck is going, if he has a delivery. It -- right now they have backups once in a while. It's ridiculous now. And to say that there's 10 percent of the people that oppose this, when you don't tell the people, that's how you have 10 percent. No notification to the residents. Nobody was told. We're just finding all this out now, and most of them didn't know. And the people that live there and are away right now have no idea at all. There was no meetings saying, "This is what's going to happen." No meetings at all, none, zero. Not for the residents, anyway. Maybe there was a meeting for a chosen few. But in order to have a meeting, you have to have everybody involved. There's something drastically wrong here. I Page 34 Augus 0,, jj don't know what it is, but I understood that everybody was supposed to be involved. If yous check out the entrance and exit to this, somebody -- we're causing a problem on 951 on the entrance. If they said they have a 50 -foot setback now, suppose the state later on wants to widen this road? What do they do? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: That's not an issue we're going to be able to handle here today, the widening of the road. MR. MATTALIANO: That's true. But you might be having -- you might have a problem down the road. You can't think about down the road and not handle it today. You have to have everything in your mind now, no? Thank you. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: For the record, you did give notification to the -- the proper notification -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: - -Everybody was notified at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and I -- I sent out around 500 -and- something letters. I have copies of that, and I have record of that. Everybody was notified. People received notification where they receive the tax bill. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. And I believe the attorney for the applicant has already stated that we had two meetings, so perhaps you missed those meetings, but thank you for -- MR. MATTALIANO: We had two meetings, but the people weren't involved. I mean, let's -- we're going to call something something. The people themselves weren't involved in the meetings. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Should your board of directors, who the meeting was with, have informed the residents that there was going to be a meeting of this sort and -- MR. MATTALIANO: They don't. They said this was -- you're right. That's your -- right. This is our problem here, but you have to understand when somebody says to you, "Well, we agree to it," it's Page 35 6,i% i L 111 not so. I mean, you have to understand. If you're listening to somebody and there's a few that say, "We agree to it, and we represent" -- they're not representing the people that are here. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Well, that -- you can get into the problem of that you've elected a board of directors to represent -- MR. MATTALIANO: No. I didn't elect nobody. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We're not going to have a debate here. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: And they made the decision. That's your problem with your board of directors. MR. MATTALIANO: You're right. It's supposed to be just like you said, but what's supposed to be is not, unfortunately. It's not your problem. It's my problem. But what's supposed to be is not. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. Thank you very much. MR. MATTALIANO: You're welcome. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: The next speaker? MS. MURRAY: The next speaker is Margaret Mattaliano followed by Sylvia Grinder. MS. MATTALIANO: I'm Margaret Mattaliano, wife of Vinnie Mattaliano. You have the address. Basically, what he's saying is my feelings also. I'd like to make one comment. You have in your possession a letter from the representatives of Falling Waters. I would also like to see the letters that they solicited from the owners that said we agree to this. Where are those letters? If it's important to have something in writing, they should have something in writing, and I would like to see it. In addition to that, Mr. -- I'm sorry. Your first name is Chahram. Excuse me for calling you by your first name. When did you visit that property? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Excuse me. We're not going to have a discussion back and forth. You ask -- MS. MATTALIANO: No. I just am asking -- Page 36 Augusl'1G, JJ CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: You ask us the questions, and -- MS. MATTALIANO: Okay. Could I ask -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: -- then I would ask the staff. MS. MATTALIANO: -- Mr. Chahram (sic). CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Go ahead and ask us. That's how it works. MS. MATTALIANO: When did he visit this property, this entranceway? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Three weeks ago. I don't recall exactly what day it was. MS. MATTALIANO: And you saw the entranceway and the congestion that would be caused by this. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. We can't go back and forth. MS. MATTALIANO: All right. I'm sorry. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: But go ahead and make your next point. MS. MATTALIANO: The point is what -- the point -- what people have been saying. When we're trying to get out, when we're trying to come out from this entrance -- the units are over here. We're coming out here. The trucks or whoever it is is going to pass across us and try to go into -- they say now 800 units. I mean, there's -- 600 units, 800 units. With the increase in the size for the commercial property, it's going to be a traffic jam even, on the other side. The space between the fence and the -- the waterfall is so small. I mean, if somebody has to make a decision, we have to get, you know, people that evaluate these things and say, "Well, this is the congestion." Okay. You're going to reduce the congestion on 951. What are you going to do to the people that are trying to live there? What about the accidents within that area? And in addition to that, they say the water, the drainage from this area here now, is going to go back into our lakes over there. Page 37 August 1b,401 They have to drain off into our lakes over there. I called the water commission when I first came here the end of July, the lake was up on my property. Now they're going to put more water in that lake? I don't understand that. When they're going to do something that's going to interfere with the canals and the rivers and every -- don't you have, like, the water commissioner or somebody goes out and evaluates that? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: I believe the PUD has been designed to handle the water and the drainage for the residential areas and the commercial areas. MS. MATTALIANO: Though now, with the heavy rain, it was very, very bad. It was very bad. And I think basically -- I -- again, I take -- take exception to the 10 percent, only 10 percent of the people here. We're only 10 percent of the people that are here. The people are up north. They're going to come in January. If you want to hear a voice, you know, I could say to you I called -- and I have.-- I called people in Brooklyn that I know that have units. "Are they crazy? What are they doing ?" And what are you going to say to me? "Where are their letters ?" Where are the letters from the homeowners to the board of directors that said I approve of it? I'm sorry. That's it. Thank you. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. Our next registered speaker. MS. MURRAY: Sylvia Grinder followed by K. Wagner. MS. GRINDER: Sylvia Grinder, 6720 Beach Resort Drive, No. 13. I'm in Phase 3. Phase 3 was not advised of those meetings, and I would like to see what's in those letters that you have. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Which letters you are -- MS. GRINDER: The opposition. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: The notification -- MS. GRINDER: And how many were in Phase 3? Page 38 August 16, 41 MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Notification was sent to everybody within the development. MS. GRINDER: Not of the meetings that transpired on Beach Resort Drive clubhouse. MS. MURRAY: Excuse me. I'm sorry. The notification Mr. -- Chahram is referring to is the official notification of this public hearing. If your board had other meetings, ma'am, that's not a notification that -- MS. GRINDER: It was with these gentlemen, and Phase 3 was not advised. MS. MURRAY: We're not required to notify other than -- I'm sorry -- our legal notification for the public hearing. That would be an issue you would need to take up with your board of directors. MS. GRINDER: Is there any way to find out how many letters are from Phase 3 and from Phase 4 that Mr. Chahram has? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Why don't we let him -- you finish your part, and we'll have him count through -- MS. GRINDER: I'm finished. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. Thank you. And then as we get to that -- when he comes up with an answer, we'll let you know. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: I don't know what address would be Phase 3. I have letters with addresses on them. I don't know which one's Phase 3, which one's Phase 2. 6680 would be -- I don't know which phase it would be. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: You are representing, though, that a letter was sent to every property owner in the area. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Correct. MS. MURRAY: We would have the addresses of all those that were sent, so you're, you know, welcome to look at the file after the hearing. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Chahram, why don't you hand her the Page 39 Auguslo, JA letters that were included for us and let her look through them. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I don't know if she's wanting the objections. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Well, if she -- anybody from Phase 3 said anything about support -- those are the only ones we have available. Our next speaker. MS. MURRAY: Eileen La Rocco. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: And the one after that? MS. MURRAY: The final speaker after that is Robert Williams. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. And would you spell your name, please. MS. LA ROCCO: My name is Eileen La Rocco, and I'm at 6580 Beach Resort Drive. Okay. First of all, I also have to say I heard nothing about the 10 percent in favor of it until right now. I was not asked to sign anything, whether I was for it or against it or anything. This is the first I've heard of it. We were also wondering when the PUD was changed. Okay. Does anyone know that? Because according to the documents, none of -- fast food and all that stuff was not allowed, and then all of a sudden it is allowed. So we were wondering when it was changed because nobody was aware of their right to oppose it. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: I'm going to defer to our county attorney. MS. STUDENT: I think I can address that. I think the PUD document, just so everybody understands, is a document -- a zoning document that's approved by the local government. I think the document that you're referring to are condo documents, which are private documents. The local government has nothing to do with those. So that is a matter between the developer and the property owners. Page 40 August O, And sometimes you find situations -- and there is just a plethora of case law that deals with these issues, particularly with deed restrictions that have different requirements than zoning. And problems can evolve with that because the local government does its zoning on the basis of the police power that's reserved to the state by virtue of the United States Constitution, and these other documents are private matters between property owners. So there can be some inherent conflicts, and it gets rather complicated. MS. LA ROCCO: But if the zoning was changed giving it the okay to have the fast -food restaurants, we did not have to be notified? MS. STUDENT: I think, just by way of history again, what typically happens is you have a developer or property owner that comes in and has his -- applies to have his property rezoned to PUD. This occurs, obviously, before he develops it. Once he develops it with the residential component, then you have other property owners involved. So this property would not have been developed at all when the first PUD was approved. And subsequent to that if a PUD amendment, as the case is here, is applied for and processed, then the property owners are notified. So what I'm trying to say is that original PUD was done -- it had to have been done before the property was even developed. MS. LA ROCCO: I know. But I guess it's either a yes -or -no question. when it was changed -- now we were notified of this. But when it was changed, gust yes or no, were we supposed to be notified like we were now? MS. STUDENT: You couldn't have been because you didn't even own it yet. It was owned by the person that developed it, and that was when the first PUD was done. And rezone -- MS. LA ROCCO: But I thought it was done sometime in between, like maybe a couple years ago. Page 41 AugueF1640PI CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Now, we do -- MS. STUDENT: That's my understanding. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Right. Chahram, you did provide us information in the -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Originally -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: One moment, Chahram. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Sorry. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: You provided this information in our executive summary that this PUD document has been changed two different times since 1988. Would you care to clarify that? Thank you. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Yes. It was done in 1988. Then in 1992 they amended. It wasn't a major amendment, just a minor amendment. But in 1998 they added recreational tract. They added this tract, and that was another amendment. These uses, commercial uses, have been there since 1988, so they did not -- they were on here when this was approved, the commercial uses. I believe that there was a sales trailer sitting where the commercial tract is, and it was nicely landscaped, and people did not realize that that's a commercial tract. They thought that was the landscape buffer or something when they bought those units. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Does that clear -- MS. LA ROCCO: Yeah. Okay. I have a few other things. One thing to make clear, most people that live in Falling Waters Beach Resort have really been intimidated with "if you don't have this, look at what else you could have" and making it seem very bad. It's sort of like asking all of us, "What would you rather have, a punch in the mouth or a punch in the head? Take your pick." And you're standing there -- "I don't know," you know. So, I mean, we -- but I have -- I have a solution, as I go on, to what we -- possibly what we could have. Page 42 AugEscYJ, A01 Also we should not have to share the same -- I'm also a Realtor, and I've been a Realtor for 25 years. And we should not have to share the same entrance with something that is going to be busy. Now, I don't know about any of you on the panel, but I ask you to consider this: Wherever you live, if you live in a gated community, would you want to share your entrance with -- with another? All right. I have another point. There -- I personally cannot think of any other developments that share an entry that are gated communities. There may be. I may be wrong. I don't know of every single community in -- okay. But another very good point, I think, and nobody brought this up yet, is when you come in on the left side where the trailer is right now, okay, where they're proposing the building, there's an awful lot of children that live in the development, and they-walk outside the gate right there. They can't stand on 951. They'll for surely be killed. They're little kids. Now, if they stand on the side where this proposal is supposed to be built -- and that's where they stand there, so when the cars are going in and the cars are coming out, they're not hit by any cars coming out neither. So they stand there. Now, can you imagine these little kids, littler than me, and standing there and waiting for trucks. The trucks aren't going to see them, and you know kids. I ask you people not to make a mistake because this is an accident waiting to be -- happen. And you don't want to have, God forbid, a child -- and I -- I do not have any children that live in the development. My children are adults. But I would not want to see any child, God forbid, killed or maimed and then have somebody on the panel say, "You know what? In hindsight I think I made a mistake." Also, they should have their own entrance and their own exit. Not only an exit, they should have their own entrance and exit because Page 43 AuBUai"I this is an accident waiting to be -- happen. Every day kids are standing there waiting to get on the school bus, and then they get off and they walk home. And you're having transient drivers a lot, you know, coming in and out. I would say to all of you if you could -- before you make your decision, if you could visit the entry and say to yourself, what would you want if it was your decision? I think, you know, you have to look at it personally. I think it's fine to look at pictures, but go there personally and look at it. See where the kids right now stand and wait for their bus. If you were to see it visually, I think you would understand it more. And someone asked, "Well, what do you propose instead? What's the other proposal ?" And we were never given this opportunity, but I was figuring something out. Yeah, why not have all the people buy - - and I wouldn't handle the transaction, so I wouldn't take any commission. All right. Why not have all the people just offer to put in -- and it would only be whatever -- and buy it. And, you know, even if some people didn't want to buy it, I was figuring out that over five years' of time, it would only amount to about $40 raised per month in their maintenance fee. I was doing different calculations. I do not have the exact sales price, but I was doing some calculations. There should be an alternative. And you say, "Well, what would they want it for ?" To keep it beautiful. Why do you think they bought there for? You know, even if they leave it totally green and with flowers and nothing -- just to keep it the way it is. People bought there, with children, wanting a nice place, gated, quiet. The kids can't stand on the highway. I mean, it's a lot of -- it's a lot of problems. And I guess finding there's problems with the water. There's so many, and I won't even go into it, that other people did. But I'm =., .. Augul i64,JI going to ask you if you would please postpone it until you can come out there personally and view everything. And also, even if you give us limited time to ask the people of Falling Waters if they want to buy it, I think they should be given that right. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Just as a comment to that, you do have that right. Enter into negotiations with the current owner. MS. LA ROCCO: Pardon me? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: There is a contract on the property now with this specific sales -- excuse me, self - storage as a condition in the requirement, so you may wish to talk to your people to determine that, because you do have that option, and you do have time between now and the time that -- MS. LA ROCCO: What do you mean? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: You could discuss with the owner of the property the purchase of it, if you chose to. But there is a contract on the property right now. MS. LA ROCCO: Oh, I know. But I mean, if this -- if this -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: But that's not something that we can -- MS. LA ROCCO: Okay. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: -- offer for you -- MS. LA ROCCO: Right. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: -- to do. There's no help that we can be in that particular category. It's -- we could almost get into a discussion about the rights of private property and what you can and can't do with it. MS. LA ROCCO: Right. Okay. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: The zoning that is currently there right now, and they -- as you mentioned you were concerned that -- whether you get a knock in the head or a knock in the face, it's two different things. But we're talking about a private property that is zoned, and you can literally have over 4,000 trips a day if it is Page 45 AuBUSN�EE04 developed to what is allowed in the PUD right now before we make any changes. MS. LA ROCCO:, I know. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: And there would be a lot of traffic coming in and out. So a self - storage presented to us is a lot less traffic. And I believe it's the Uniform Traffic Code that you do something with for calculations, and I would like to hear from staff to get it on the record -- MS. LA ROCCO: Can I just make -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: -- when you're through. I want to be able to have a couple of comments made with reference to the limited access on 951 in this entrance, that type of thing. MS. LA ROCCO: Okay. Yes. I understand that. But, you know, if that were to be so, that -- that their contract went through and so forth and that was so, no matter what was built there should not have the same entry and exit that we have. This is an accident waiting to happen. As you know, many times things have been passed, and then somebody is either killed or maimed, and then they say, in hindsight, "Maybe we should have reviewed this a little more." If this self - storage, for whatever reason, did go through, I think the biggest concern that people have over all -- anything is sharing the entrance because it's backed up now when you get there, and it's summer. And imagine if you're going to turn in there when it's season. Where's the cars going to be, backed up on 951? And what about the children that stand there? This is really creating a very, very hazardous problem, dangerous. And I don't think any one of you, if, God forbid, something happened, would want that hanging over your head. I think maybe you should review with the people who are petitioning this and see if there's another access road or some way. Page 46 AugusTl6AJ CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: It's up to the county, and so we've made that particular point, and we will have transportation explain just a little bit more for the clarification of why -- MS. LA ROCCO: Okay. But -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: -- there's only one entrance into this -- MS. LA ROCCO: But rules can always be changed. That's what happened in between, and that always happens. Rules are changed. I mean, let's face it. Foxfire was a private road and became a gated road, I mean -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We're not going to discuss Foxfire. MS. LA ROCCO: -- without bringing that up again. But, you know, there's always rules to be broken. And this is kind of a silly rule, to have two -- a gated community be an access with another business. I ask you to just review that. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: And I will say that I have been there before myself, and I do not live in a gated community. MS. LA ROCCO: Pardon me? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: I do not live in a gated community. MS. LA ROCCO: Well, that's fine. I mean, I'm not saying any preference over a gated community or not a gated -- even if it wasn't a gated community, I don't think anyplace should have to share an access road like that and cause more of a havoc with traffic. I ask you to please visit it and see what I'm talking about. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. We'll hear from transportation to clarify that point, and then we'll have additional public speakers. MS. MURRAY: We have one more public speaker. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Let's have the additional public speaker first, and then we'll -- MS. MURRAY: That's Robert Williams. MR. WILLIAMS: Good morning. I'm Robert Williams, and Page 47 16J1 August 16, 2001 I'm kind of naive to this process so very unprepared. But from what I've listened to here, I feel for all these people because I get a sense of deceivement here. It says here -- all the focus has been on 951 and Collier Boulevard, but it also involves 41, I believe, and it says right here it does, anyway, which is my agenda more. And as I drive down there where I own some property there, I notice that there is another access being installed there to -- to Falling Waters, I believe. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: No, sir. That's a different property. MR. WILLIAMS: That's a different property. Okay. Well, it looks like it's going into Falling Waters from what I see. And the square footage being raised to 74,000, my property only has 65,000 so that would do -- wouldn't do me any good at all for resale purposes or -- or future benefit for my property. So I just feel like there's more that needs to be revealed on what's going on over there and have a future -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Could I ask a question? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Where did you live, sir? MR. WILLIAMS: I live in Golden Gate. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: In Golden Gate? And the prop -- I'm trying to understand your concern. Your concern is that you own property on Tamiami Trail that's nearby that might be impacted by this? MR. WILLIAMS: Exactly right. It's on 41, and it's not up to the new changes that they're proposing in here, which I bought it, you know, under the PUD now. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Is your property in the activity center? MR. WILLIAMS: It's on 41 on the canal there, the water management canal, Henderson Creek. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: And you have a PUD on Page 48 AuguJliS,401 it? You have a PUD now? MR. WILLIAMS: Well, I'm unprepared. I'm sorry. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I just wanted to make sure I understood your concern. MR. WILLIAMS: But I did get this letter, and it says in here intersection of Collier Boulevard and U.S. 41 in Section 3, Township 51, which is where my property lies. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: It would appear that the instant issue doesn't really impact you, if I understand correctly. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: I don't believe it's going to impact this gentleman, no. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. MR. WILLIAMS: Okay. Well, that's -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. MR. WILLIAMS: -----all I have, so I'm going -by that - Thank you. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Can we have a clarification from transportation about that limited access road, 41, 951 or Collier Boulevard? MR. MULLER: I must apologize. I wasn't sworn in. (The speaker was sworn.) MR. MULLER: Russ Muller, for the record. I think the trip generations that were calculated were calculated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, and the limited access on 951 is controlled by the access management plan. It's a Class 3 road, and they can only have intersections or driveways every 660 feet. There isn't enough room. If they would put something on the north side, it would conflict with what's across the street. Somebody would be trying to go all the way across and make a U- turn. The PUD allows for access to U.S. 41 under certain criteria. And if you have any other questions -- it's a controlled access. The Page 49 Augusl N,,J board has -- has seen that 951 in the future is going to be a heavily traveled road. And it's control of access. We don't want a number of driveways on it. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Mr. Wolfley. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: In view of the children, is it not so -- and maybe you don't know -- that, for one, the right side of the entry is wider than -- the entry is wider than the exit and that school buses come in, get the children, and then do the U -turn right back out the exit before it hits the gate? To your knowledge, is that what happens? I've watched it. So I'm wondering -- if there were a McDonald's there, I'm afraid that would cause a tremendous amount of traffic -- people back there in the morning, getting a cup of coffee or something, and going to work -- than a storage facility, who I don't believe would create the traffic and the opportunity for a child to be injured. Since the school bus comes in and goes a couple hundred feet, picks up the children, and immediately goes out, I'm having a hard time seeing the validity of that -- that problem. I just don't see it. Do you? Do you see something with what the lady -- MR. MULLER: Well, children are always a problem in traffic. We try to separate them as much as we can. In a number of locations, the -- they've put in bus - stop -type facilities through a PUD. This one doesn't. But if the, you know, residents would go together, I'm sure that the county would permit such a thing to where the people that are entering the -- the development will know that this is a place for kids and where they hang out to wait for the bus. But you're correct. A McDonald's would generate a lot more traffic than a storage unit. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Can I ask a question? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Yes. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'm not in scale here. How Page 50 Augusil6 AA wide is the frontage on 951? You talk about curb cuts every 660 feet. MR. MULLER: Maybe the petitioner can help me with that. I can't read my little thing. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: So the only access is on U.S. 41? There's nothing on Collier Boulevard? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: No. On 951. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Right. It's on -- right. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'm just wondering how far it is over to the corner of the tract. Is that more than 660 feet? MR. TYSON: For the record, I'm Bruce Tyson with WilsonMiller. The access point -- this distance right here is 100 feet. The -- that right -of -way is 100 feet. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: My question was, if we were -- you know, if we were considering, with transportation's interest in this, having another entrance /exit, some way to make a better traffic pattern, they've thrown up that we have a access management plan that decrees that it can only be 660 feet, and I'm wondering if this is within 660 feet. I just want to know how wide that is from there to the corner of your property. MR. TYSON: There's another major access that is already with a median in this location, and the distance between those two is approximately 800 feet. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So then it would be very conceivable that you could have an exit because -- MR. TYSON: No. Impossible. It's got to be 660 feet apart. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: It's not within? It has to be exactly 660 feet? MR. MULLER: Minimum. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well -- MR. MULLER: The access management -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: You've got 800 feet now. Page 51 AugusF�4OA1 MR. MULLER: The access management plan would say a minimum of 660 feet. We do have that controlled access corridor which goes beyond that, and it would probably not look at minimums. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well, just simply, at the corner of -- I'm looking at Falling Waters Beach Resort. This thing right here that you have up. If you'd point, Chahram. The one you had up. On the upper right -hand corner, that's all facing 951. It looks like, as has been indicated, there's a curb cut right there going out to wherever it goes. Right? On the north? Here. This is the curb cut; right? MR. MULLER: Right. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Now, I'm wondering why you can't get a connection from here -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Turn this way when you talk so she can hear. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'm wondering why you can't get a exit or some kind of traffic control arrangement just to go out on 951. You're right there. I'm not seeing how that violates the access management plan. MR. MULLER: We wouldn't want that to be a full median. It's too close to 41. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: It's already there. You already have a full median. MR. MULLER: That's directional. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'm not sure I understand your -- MR. MULLER: It's a left hand. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Coming which direction? MR. MULLER: Northbound. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Going northbound and I Page 52 Augu Tlb41 can only turn left? MR. MULLER: Yeah. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well, that's the way that people would want to come out. I mean, give them that opportunity. You know, we're trying to solve a problem here. This is a PUD that was designed in 1988, and I'm sure, you know, the wisdom of staff, we wouldn't design a PUD this way anymore. I mean, it's -- has created its own problems. We have it. Now we're trying to see if we can't be a little innovative and figure out a way to solve some of these problems. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: That would require the property owners to the north giving permission to connect and grant easement to this property to go through the existing driveway. So that's not a -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Those property owners are what? You said that's a water treatment plant or something? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: It's not the county water treatment plant. It's a private plant. It supplies water to Marco Island. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: It doesn't sound to me like it's such a big stretch for the applicant to get a little bit involved here and see if we can't work something out. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: But I don't think, Mr. Richardson, that we can require the private property owner to talk to another property owner at this point. That is not part of what we can do here. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: We can certainly request it, and I'd like to see that as part of at least the considerations to resolve some of these issues. MS. MURRAY: Madam Chair, you could certainly make that as part of your recommendation, as part of your vote, to the Board of County Commissioners. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: And the issue is to have another access, entry, egress and ingress, into Falling Waters specifically by Page 53 16J1 August 16, 2001 the commercial tract? Is that what we're -- MR. BADAMTCHIAN: The feasibility of that being explored. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: The feasibility being explored. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Because, you know, I think clearly -- and what I'm hearing from the residents, they got kind of an unfortunate situation here, but it is a situation we're all faced with. It's a really -- with a single entrance like this, you're going to have conflicts, and it's a poor design. I think we're moving in the direction of the lesser of two evils to reduce some of the traffic volumes here with the proposed use, but you're still left with a potential that could -- I think could be more innovatively explored. And I just would like to encourage the people that are involved in this, and the BCC as they get to it, to consider that. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do we have any further public speakers? Any further comments from staff? Excuse me. Ms. Murray, is that the last public speaker? MS. HURRAY: I'm sorry. That's the last public speaker. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. Okay. Close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Could I ask -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Yes. Let's have some -- oh, yes. I believe the applicant may wish to comment, but I closed the public hearing. Do you wish to say anything further? I guess I have to give some latitude because we closed the public hearing. MR. ANDERSON: Well, a lawyer rarely gives up the opportunity -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: That's true. MR. ANDERSON: -- to speak. I just would ask you to take a cold hard look at the facts, particularly with regard to the traffic issue. I mean, all the commercial uses that are presently permitted and that we propose to eliminate were in the original approved PUD. The Page 54 Augu st6 AUr joint access was in the original approved PUD. We'll check into the possibility of -- of that connection on the side, but perhaps the thing that is really most accomplishable, that the residents could do on their own, is try to get that access open on 41 so that they have two ways to get in and out. That would be -- seem to me to be the thing to do. That way they'd have an option. And this is a prime parcel in an activity center, and it will be developed commercially. Let there be no question about that. And we can't please everybody, but we did try. And we do have a letter of support -- or no objection from the elected representatives of three of the condominium associations. Thank you. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Mr. Anderson, there were a couple other issues raised that I wonder if you might be able to creatively respond to. The children and the safety issue and the school bus, it seems that that might be something that your -- your client could help us deal with in terms of some sort of representation there. Is there -- could you design a better pickup and drop -off area for the school children as part of what you're going to plan on your space? I mean, if that's -- you know, that's brought up as a question, and I just thought -- MR. CHESLYN: I'm David Cheslyn. I'm with Skinner & Broadbent, the applicant. A comment about that is, I don't know how we would work out a bus stop acc -- you know, location for the kids. We could look into that. But one thing to keep in mind, everyone visiting our facility is a tenant, and it's a secured facility. We don't have -- you know, if it is a fast -foot restaurant, McDonald's, whomever, you have a number of different people coming through the facility every day. The only people visiting our facility are tenants. They've leased a space from us. And they make very few trips, generally speaking. Less than 15 percent of our business is commercial business. Page 55 A46l� to I Everything else is the individuals. So as far as the traffic flow in and out of the project, it's going to be greatly reduced from what potentially would be on the site of a commercial development. Now, we can look into a bus stop, but keep in mind, like I said, we don't have people just driving through our parking lots. If it's a shopping center, you know, you can have people coming and going that are just making turnarounds, whatever. They can't even get into our facility. It's gated so we limit access. We limit traffic. So from that standpoint I think it's a safer environment for the children than what it would be if it were a commercial shopping center. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: You bring up an issue that I've not heard discussed before. I did not realize that you were going to have gated entry into these two parcels. MR. CHESLYN: Correct. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Would you explain that? MR. CHESLYN: It's a gated, monitored system. We have full security cameras. We have 24 -hour on -site management that lives in an apartment/office. And we also monitor, via our computer system, trips made to the facility. So we know who's coming, who's going, when they're leaving, so on. So that is all -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Is this something like a keypad sort of thing? MR. CHESLYN: Keypad. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: And the gate swings open and -- MR. CHESLYN: Yes. Either lifts or swings, depending on the actual design, but correct. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So even if we had another entrance /exit arrangement on the -- what I'll call the front right -- top right -hand side, it would only be available to people that had already securely entered your facility. Page 56 Augu3k 6.41 MR. CHESLYN: That's correct. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: It wouldn't be available for any other traffic, for instance, from the rest of the residents? MR. CHESLYN: For the rest of the residents? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well, I had not assumed that this was -- it wasn't explained. MR. CHESLYN: Right. It's a gated facility for security reasons, and so we can -- and that way we can limit, you know, who is accessing our property. I mean, that's, again, why, you know, the traffic generation is -- I mean, it's very limited. And someone asked about -- pointed out something else. Someone mentioned that, you know, someone -- what, someone's only going to visit this facility one time a day? The reality is people won't visit it one time a day. I mean, we -- less than 15 percent is commercial. So on the commercial side, sure, you may have somebody making -- you know, manufacturers' reps store shoes in the space, whatever. He goes there to, you know, pick up product and go. He may be there a few times a week. The average person, you or I. renting a storage facility is going to store something in that facility. Maybe you're moving. You're going to store it, you're going to leave it, and you're going to come back and pick it up when you're ready to move. I mean, so you could go months with making just two trips: One there, one back to pick up your stuff, and you're done. And like I said, that's 85 percent of our traffic. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Your comments are very helpful. Thank you. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. Do we have any further discussion or questions? COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: We are here to discuss setback; correct? Page 57 CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: That's part of what the changes are for this PUD, yes. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: I want to try to stay focused here. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Just in the way of commentary before you call for a motion, I'd just like to summarize where I am on this. And I must say that -- and I want to say this as gently as I can -- I don't feel that I had as much information from the staff as I could have had that would have made this whole process a little smoother. In terms of my reaction to this, I look at this as -- the proposal as a lesser of a number of evils, all of which were put in motion when this PUD was originally put in place back in 1988, meaning there was a commercial area that was established. As I said before, and I'll say it again, I don't think we would be designing a PUD or permitting a PUD to come in with this current design if we were looking at it fresh. We'd try to plan some other entrances and exits. But this is what we've got. It's a poor traffic design. This is a lesser of two evils. Right now the residents there are looking at this as vacant property, so they're not seeing the impact that could happen. And so on that basis I would encourage the applicant to do as much as he can to be a good neighbor there, including looking at some way to -- on the safety issue for the children, if there's a way to work that out. But absent that, I would certainly move in favor of approving this. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Is that a notion to move for approval? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We have a motion for -- move for approval. Do we have a second? COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: And I will second it. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We have a motion by Mr. Richardson Page 58 and a second by Mr. Wolfley to approve this particular petition. Do we have some discussion? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: If I may, I was on the boards that -- that changed the PUD for the side entrance. That's now a recreation area. If I remember correctly -- and sometimes my memory isn't as good as it used to be -- you were supposed to have an entrance onto 41 from Falling Waters, and the people at that time didn't want it, and we changed it to a recreation area. So there was an entrance and exit that you could have had that you didn't want. I think it's the lesser of two evils, and I'm going to vote for it, although I can sympathize not wanting change to your entry. Nobody likes change. Once they've moved in, they sort of get used to what they have. But that's the nature of the game in Collier County. Everything changes. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: They certainly could reopen that issue of an entrance and exit to 41 as possibly a little self - improvement of their own. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Ms. Young. COMMISSIONER YOUNG: I agree. I've -- I know that entrance and have checked it out, you know, with some care and am very sympathetic to the problems of the residents. But I can only conclude, under the law, that this is the lesser of two evils. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Any other comment? No further discussion, I'd like to call the question. If you want to make a statement when you vote, that's okay. All those in favor say aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Those opposed say no. (No response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: The motion carries. My comment is that I have to vote for this because of the reduction in traffic very specifically. It is a poor design entryway. And I would like to Page 59 Auglt0G,12L1 encourage the residents to see if they could get another entry -- excuse me -- exit from their development, and you may want to chat with your -- the owners to see if there is a possibility to buy in case this contract does not come through. Your next opportunity to talk about this will be before the Board of County Commissioners, and that, I believe, is scheduled the 11th of September, according to the information we have in front of us. So thank you very much for taking your time to come today. We'll move on to the next agenda item unless we need a break for the court reporter. We'll take a short recess for the court reporter. (A break was held.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. We'd like to go back into session again here. Our next item is PUDZ -- Item No. E, PUDZ- 2001 -AR -3 83; is that correct? Okay. All those wishing to present testimony today, please stand, raise your right hand, and be sworn in by the clerk of the courts. (The speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Is the petitioner here? MR. REISCHL: Yes. Good morning, Commissioners. Fred Feischl, planning services. This is a request for a rezone of property that's currently C -1 and C -1 /ST to PUD. You see the location on the visualizer. Here's Pine Ridge Road, Airport Road. So it's in the northeast quadrant. The blue is the subject parcel. To the south is the existing Park Central office complex. To the east is the YMCA, and to the north is the Tall Pines subdivision. The site is 3.78 acres, and the petitioner proposes approximately -- not approximately -- proposes 36,000 square feet of office and medical office. The land uses are generally compatible with the C -1 zoning district that currently exists today. There are a few exceptions. I've noted them in the staff report. If you have any questions on them, I'd be happy to address them for you. Page 60 AuguR 0,4,4 The reason that the petitioner is proposing this rezone because it's, basically C -1 to C -1, is that the configuration of the -- size and the configuration of the wetland on site. You can see the -- in green the wetland, and it takes up a considerable portion of the site. The petitioner -- the rule of thumb that generally developers use is -- and, again, it's a rule of thumb; it's not a code or anything -- but generally 10,000 square feet per acre is expected to be usable, developable land. And with a 3.78 acre parcel, they are proposing 36,000 square feet of office and medical. It generally goes along with that rule of thumb. What the petitioner proposed in the PUD was to keep, generally, all the C -1 uses but, because of the limited footprints, to go up higher. And in C -1 the building height limitation is 35 feet. They propose going to 45 feet. The petitioner and staff entered into discussions, and we came up with a compromise that the -- any of the tracts along Cougar Drive, which is closest to the Tall Pines subdivision, would be limited to 35 feet, which is the C -1 height limitation and also the height limitation in the Tall Pines subdivision. That would provide a visual transition between the res -- I'm sorry -- between the residential subdivision, the 35-foot buildings here, and the taller buildings on the south side adjacent to existing Park Central. Access -- this is Airport Road over here, and this is YMCA Road. Access would be through an existing easement on the east side of the existing Park Central development here. Actually, that easement goes all the way up to Cougar Drive. Cougar Drive is controlled by the school board. They did not grant an access off Cougar Drive. There will be also no access from Airport Road, so the only access is from YMCA Road. The parcel is within Activity Center 13, and it's consistent with the Future Land Use Map and the Growth Management Plan. The EAC recommended approval 7 -0. I've received no calls or letters, pro or Page 61 AugusE��� con, and staff recommends approval. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do we have any questions of staff? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I have a question, if I may. This site is a really good example of where -- what I think we should be trying to do with application of our zoning ordinances. It has a rather large area that needs to be preserved, and it has an area that can be developed. I guess I'm going to work on contesting this rule of thumb that you've used to come up with the square footage that's permitted on this particular application. Would you help me if -- understand if you took the -- just area that was able to be built on, the white areas indicated on this, and give me an idea of what square footage the applicant would be entitled to under a strict application of just building on what he could build on? MR. REISCHL: If the wetland was configured the same way it is on this master plan? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Yes. MR. REISCHL: That's approximately an acre and a half, I believe. So, again, using a rule of thumb, that would be about 15,000 fewer square feet. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So if we were applying a standard that said that unbuildable land should not be built on and no bonus density credits should be given for its preservation, this application would be entitled to something in the order of 15,000 square feet, following my assumptions. MR. REISCHL: Closer to twenty if my -- if I'm doing my math correctly. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Okay. Twenty versus the 36,000 that's presently being requested? MR. REISCHL: That's correct. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: And I direct your attention back to the -- your summary here where we talk about the Page 62 AugustI0,41 consistency with the Growth Management Plan. And I'm looking back on conservation and coastal management element and going down through the recitation of the policies that we're trying to implement in the county. MR. REISCHL: Oh, are you talking about the EAC staff report? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Yes. I guess that's it. I'm sorry. They're not numbered. It's page 3 of 10. And I can understand why the EAC approved this, because it's -- it's complying with these policy objectives. I mean, we're preserving land. But as I go through these policy objectives, it's -- each one of them talks about incentive to try to preserve land that shouldn't be built on, but no one -- nowhere in here do I see in these policies a statement that says that we should award bonus density, then, to the developer that's -- that owns the rest of the property - -- owns this site. And I wonder how staff feels about that, how -- how you can make it consistent for me that -- that these bonus density credits go to support these policies when the policies don't require us to do that. MR. REISCHL: You're correct. However, this is an activity center. And in an activity center, we -- we accept off -site mitigation for wetland impacts. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Is there off -site mitigation in this case? MR. REISCHL: I don't think so. They -- the petitioner -- yes, there is. Okay. I'm sorry. There is a small amount of wetland impact to create the drive aisle between the two parcels that -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: As I understand off -site -- I didn't mean to interrupt you. As I understand the concept of off -site mitigation, that allows you to fill in something that shouldn't be built on. So you built on it, so you make up for it someplace else. MR. REISCHL: By creating wetland in a mitigation bank. Page 63 AuguX 61,4bP1 COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: But except for this little piece that you've identified, the wetlands that are being preserved is the area that's right on the site, the green area shown here. MR. REISCHL: That's correct. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So under -- absent a mitigation off site, that property would have to be -- this ST overlay, that would have to be preserved, would it not? I mean, is there any any circumstance the county would allow him to build on that? MR. REISCHL: With off -site mitigation. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well, I know. MR. REISCHL: But except for that, no. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So without significant off - site mitigation, the only buildable land he has is this one point something acres. MR. REISCHL: That's -- the unbuildable is the 1 1/2. It's two point something for the buildable. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'm getting my numbers wrong. It's two point something that's buildable by your assessment? MR. REISCHL: Yes. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: All right. Then I would think that the staff would be looking at this to scale this down to the amount of square footage that would be permitted on the buildable land. I mean, that's where I come out. MR. REISCHL: Well, we looked at it -- and, again, the EAC looked at it -- from the perspective that you were getting -- that the petitioner is getting the desired square footage, and the county is preserving a wetland on site without preserving something at the Lee - Collier line in the Panther Island mitigation bank, which is a rural area. Here you've got the busiest intersection in Collier County, and you're preserving a cypress wetland and some surrounding vegetation. Page 64 Augusf1320@1 COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I understand -- MR. REISCHL: That was -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I understand you're preserving it, but you're also giving him density as if it weren't even there. MS. MURRAY: It's -- there's nothing in the land Development Code that -- that limits the intensity. And it's not density. When we speak of commercial, we talk of intensity. When we speak of residential, we talk of density. So there is no limitation. It's simply a rule of thumb. And in many cases in PUDs where there's been preservation areas, we've allowed additional -- I mean, we've agreed with additional square footage over and above the rule of thumb of 10,000 square feet. Another consideration is, as Fred pointed out, this is in an activity center. This is basically a C -1 use, which is the least intense commercial district, at a very intensely developed intersection. So I think by -- there's a trade -off there. When you've got C -1 less intense uses generating less traffic, I think it's reasonable to allow, you know, a little bit of leeway in terms of this rule of thumb that we apply. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Well, the applicant has an opportunity to come in and make an application based on the zoning that's there. He has chosen C -1. I mean, don't say he could have done something else. If he wanted something else, I'm sure he would have come in for something else. So he comes in with C -1, so C -1 has certain -- MS. MURRAY: Unfortunately, that's not the way we apply our -- our policies and objectives in the Growth Management Plan. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: And this is an activity center. MS. MURRAY: That's correct. MR. REISCHL: Yes. Page 65 ,01 CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Right. So he has -- it's not the full range of uses, or is it the full range of uses? MR. REISCHL: Yes, full range. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: All commercial from 1 through 5? MR. REISCHL: C -5, correct. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. So that's significant to me. Plus, I just want to reiterate to those that are out there listening to us that the EAC has done a unanimous approval, which is very unusual in the year and a half, almost two years, I've been sitting on this board, to get the economic -- excuse me -- the Environmental Advisory Council to agree on something. So they -- I take a lot of stock in what they have said, and apparently they've discussed it at length. To actually say, "This is a good project" and get a unanimous approval out of them has a lot of weight for me. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: And I have no problem with that, Madam Chairman, because I think what they are -- what they're trying to enforce or trying to persuade the government to consider more seriously is preservation of this kind of space, so that's why they would vote. But they're not considering the density of the use. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Intensity. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Excuse me. Whatever "ensity" you want to put on it. They're considering the intensity of the use. They're considering the preservation of sensitive wetlands in this case. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: I think they would have discussed the trade -off for the square footage, would they not have? MR. REISCHL: They had -- most of the questions were not environmental at the EAC. They were asking me how the footprint ratio compared to the size of the building. It was mostly planning- type questions rather than environmental questions. They were Page 66 AuBuslIGAfR happy with on -site preservation and then just had me basically explain the planning process to them. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: And I certainly understand what Mr. Richardson is saying, but I want to repeat again, I put a lot of weight on the EAC's unanimous decision. MR. REISCHL: And, again, to just emphasize how staff looked at it, it's on -site preservation rather than -- I'm not picking on Panther Island, but Panther Island is the one that comes to mind -- which is at the Lee - Collier line tucked behind Corkscrew Swamp, and not too many people are ever going to enjoy that wetland. We looked at here's a very intensely developed corner. You're preserving and enhancing, because you'll have water flow into it, a small wetland on site. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Right. Any other questions of staff? I think it's time to hear from the petitioner. MS. FARMER: For the record, Megan Farmer with Butler Environmental, agent. If you have any questions, I'll be happy to answer them. If you have any regarding the mitigation issues or -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Would you clarify the little bit of off - site mitigation? I think -- MS. FARMER: I believe at the time that this PUD was submitted there was no off -site mitigation proposed. Since then in beginning to go forward with the permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District, we have -- looking at past projects and how they were permitted, we are going to propose a small amount of off -site mitigation. That does not change what was proposed for the county. There is a total of 1.2 acres of on -site mitigation or on -site preserve. That does not include any open space that you see around the border, so the heart of the wetland is being preserved, the highest quality. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: And when you say a little off -site Page 67 AuguJ1O, A0} mitigation, what would you call a little? MS. FARMER: Less than a credit. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Less than a credit. Okay. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'm not familiar with that terminology. What does that mean? What does a credit mean? Is it an acre, or is it -- MS. FARMER: No. It has to do with the value -- the functional value of the wetland. If you have 1 acre of wetland impact, for example, depending on the functional value of that wetland, how it provides habitat for wildlife, for the state of the hydrology, the state of the vegetation, there are conversion units for -- it's kind of a complicated process. There are conversion units on how to -- how to calculate what a credit -- I'm sorry -- what an acre of impact is worth for a credit. So you may have 1 acre of impacts, and you may have to pay -- or purchase 4 credits. It just depends on the value of the wetland. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: There is a process. MS. FARMER: There is a process. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: A complicated one at that. Any other questions? Do we have any registered public speakers? MS. MURRAY: No registered speakers. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. In the event of the no registered public speakers, I close the public hearing. What is the pleasure of the board? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I'd like to make a motion that we recommend approval of Petition PUDA- 2001 -AR -3 83 (sic) to the Board of County Commissioners. COMMISSIONER YOUNG: I second it. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We have a motion by Mr. Pedone, a second by Ms. Young for approval of this petition. Do we have -- excuse me. Do we have any discussion? Augus[ l0. 40T COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'd like to offer -- excuse me. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Yes. Go ahead. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'd like to offer a little additional discussion to supplement, compliment, my vote of no for this project as it's presently presented. I -- I really am supportive, as the chairwoman is, of the EAC's approval of this, but I feel that their responsibility is as we've identified it, and they really don't have the purview of the intensity relative to the nonsensitive area. I think that is our purview. And I feel that staff, though they have these, quote, unquote, rules of thumb which are not in the zoning code that they apply to these kinds of situations, I would seriously consider and suggest that we should be looking at these rules of thumb. To take a look at a site -- and this is as good an example as I've currently seen, and there's been a lot of them, because it's so small and it's easy to comprehend -- that there's really only a certain portion of this site that's buildable, and we've identified what that is. The rest of it is going to be preserved, either directly on site, as it is here, or with some off -site mitigation. They could have come in and off -site mitigated, I guess, the whole thing. But either way, what we're left with is the buildable land that's been brought in front of us to consider for its intensity. And that intensity, following your rule of thumb of 10,000 square feet per acre, would yield them only -- whatever that number was. Was it 15,000? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: About twenty, twenty -one. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: 20,000 square feet versus the 36,000 that they're asking for. That 36,000 feet, you see, it compounded the other problems. It causes us to raise the buildings taller than we normally would permit in this area. It -- you know, and you've done a good job by stacking them, you know, putting the Page 69 Augusl1o4M14 lower ones up towards Tall Trees (sic). But I see this as an intensity that we don't have to have and -- by following our own codes. So I'm really very strongly objecting to the board approving this. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do we have any other comments about -- MS. MURRAY: May I comment? CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Comment from Ms. Murray. MS. MURRAY: I just think it's important to know that the Growth Management -- understand that the Growth Management Plan is the plan that's adopted by the county, by the Board of County Commissioners. And in there it discusses how we calculate density and intensity, and that's on gross acreage. I guess I'm going to just keep it short and sweet here, and that is by voting no -- and that certainly is your option -- I don't think -- if the message you intend to send to the board is we don't like the way the Growth Management Plan reads, I think there are better ways to probably send that message. And you as -- collectively as the Planning Commission need to decide if you all agree with that, Mr. Richardson, or not. Otherwise, I mean, we're -- you know, we're basically going to stand up in front of the Board of County Commissioners and tell them why you voted no, Mr. Richardson, and they're going to go, "Okay. Thank you." And I think if you're trying to send a message, there's better ways to do it other than vote no on these petitions and force this in front of the board rather than letting it go forward on a summary agenda. And I would just -- with that as food for thought, in your future meetings if you want to discuss the issue and send -- you know, and vote on it and send another message to the board about how you don't like the Growth Management Plan or you do, we could do that at a different time. Page 70 AugusTlb,AQl CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. Mr. Wolfley. MS. STUDENT: I'm just going to -- and this is something that will have to be looked at legally. But what this really amounts to is a mini transfer of development rights. And later on this year and into the next year, you will, as part of the rural fringe -- it's being evaluated, but it's very possible that the TDR program for that area, you know, will be coming before the board if our economist, in his evaluation, determines that this is a viable option for us. And this is a method that's used to preserve land and give incentives to preserve land. And if it's the Planning Commission's direction, at the appropriate time we can consider taking those lands that are preserve areas out of the area, if you will, that would be calculated for density. I would have to do research. I am not sure at this point whether that may be considered -a taking or not. The Supreme Court, United States Supreme Court, has been corning down hard on governments and very staunchly supporting private property rights. We have another case that was recently decided in June that, in fact, gives not even the original developer, but subsequent individuals that purchased from that developer, rights against governments when the property's been taken. And this is, you know, a little new twist. So that's something that would have to be evaluated if it's the will of the commission for us to put this in the mix. But I did want to explain that it operates like a mini TDR, which is an acceptable means that has been developed -- if it works, that is -- to -- for a local government to avoid a takings' claim. So these are all issues that would have to be looked at and so forth as part of that, from the legal side. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. I think Mr. Wolfley had a comment. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: I just feel that there's certainly Page 71 AuguJ1�4691 a need for some more development like this in the area as far as for medical, you know, for attorneys or whoever wants to work there. I think 1.29 acres of preserve is more than generous, especially concerning the area where it is. I mean, we're on, again, Airport and Pine Ridge, very busy area. And I strongly support the motion. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Any other comments? We have -- we do have a motion and a second on the floor. With no further discussion, I'll call the question. All those in favor say aye. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Aye. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Aye. COMMISSIONER YOUNG: Aye. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: Aye. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Those opposed, same sign. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'm opposed. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. Motion carries 4 to 1. MS. MURRAY: Marjorie, does that -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Does it carry? MS. MURRAY: Does it carry forward? It was 4 to 1. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Or is this a rezone? MS. STUDENT: No. It should -- let me think a minute. It should carry because it's -- it is a -- it is a majority of the board that's here. Where we would have the problem is with the comp plan amendment that requires, under our Special Act that we still have, an absolute majority of the board whether they're here or not. So that would take a five vote, but this should be fine. MS. MURRAY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Am I to understand this will not be on the summary agenda, then; it will be fully heard before the BCC? MR. REISCHL: Correct. Page 72 Augusf1OZ00i CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. Moving along to the next item on our agenda, it would have been the Indigo Lakes. Do we discuss this again, or has this been -- that's right. We did continue it by motion. Our next item was the variance for Vanderbilt Lakes, and I believe that's been continued. So we are VA- 2001 -AR -113 8, a almost -4 -foot after- the -fact variance. All those wishing to give testimony, please stand, raise your right hand, and be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were sworn.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Thank you. Mr. Reischl. MR. REISCHL: Fred Reischl, planning services. This is a request for an after - the -fact variance in RSF -3 zoning. And on the visualizer you can see the location. Santa Barbara Boulevard is to the left,- Coronado and Hunter, and you see the single- family lot- located there. Zoom in there. The required front yard in the RSF -3 district is 30 feet. The building permit for this house was issued with the front and rear setbacks reversed on the permit. It was a county error, a customer service agent error. The builder built according to the setbacks that were on the permit. The error was caught at the spot survey so the system of checks and balances did work at that point. And here you can see the blue is the property line, the red is the house, and the yellow is the paved right -of -way. I have shown on both sides of the -- on both sides of that the unpaved right -of -way. The ameliorating factor that I found in my analysis of this is that the house will still be over 45 feet from the edge of the pavement. It's not -- that's technically not how yards are measured. They're measured from the property line. But that may be considered as an ameliorating factor. There were -- no calls or letters were received, pro or con, and because of the county error and the ameliorating Page 73 AugusL,6401 9 factor of the unpaved right -of -way, we've recommended approval. That's the -- the site. You can see the block has been placed but no tie beam. The tie beam would be the next inspection. You can't get a tie beam inspection until the spot survey's approved. They did proceed at their own risk to put up the block before the spot survey was approved or, in this case, not approved. But they did not get as far as tie beam at this point. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: And before we go further, I'd just like to disclose that I had a brief conversation during the break with Johnnie Gebhardt, the customer services manager, about this issue. Do we have any questions of Mr. Reischl? COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: I just have one. What is the normal setback from the property line to the structure? MR. REISCHL: Thirty feet. Thirty feet front, twenty -five rear. It was reversed, and they marked twenty -five front. COMMISSIONER WOLFLEY: So we're asking for a 3.93 -- MR. REISCHL: Variance. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Further question, if I may. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Yes. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Is there any possibility -- I don't suppose there's any possibility this street is going to be widened any time in the future that that right -of -way would be required? MR. REISCHL: I don't know for sure, but it's a typical local street in Golden Gate. It -- when I did my site visit, there was plenty of room for both cars to pass. I can't see it being four - laned. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I notice in the -- in our packet we have a letter from Edward Perechio (phonetic) -- MR. REISCHL: Perico. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Perico, sorry -- to the applicant saying that we're going to take care of this, so don't worry about it. I'm just concerned about taking our prerogatives away from Page 74 Augusil0,, AJ us before we even have a chance to look at it. MR. REISCHL: Mr. Perico was the author. I just included it for your information. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: "We will do everything in our power to expedite processing of your variance so that your construction can continue on your house." MR. REISCHL: Okay. I think he was referring in that case to expediting the timing of it. This was put on a fast track. Reviewers were given a shorter time to review it. Unfortunately, the July 31 st board meeting was missed. This is going to go to the September 11th meeting. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Right. And just as a comment, we're very -- we look very closely at the variances that come here. People make mistakes and all, and this mistake was made by our own building department, customer services. And I think that's probably why Mr. Perico is referring to speeding this along as fast as they can because we have individual property owners attempting to build, in good faith got a permit, and there was a mistake made. And we're very hard on subcontractors and contractors when they come before us, and now we have a property owner here because something within our own organization created the difficulty for them. So I'm tending to be very supportive of this particular petition. And if we don't have any further questions of Mr. Reischl -- oh, he must have some more presentation. MR. REISCHL: Well, not a presentation, but Ms. Gebhardt asked me to put on the record that we probably have three or four county- caused variances per year, and she processes over 25,000 building permits per year. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. Do we have the petitioner? Would you like to speak? Do we have any registered public speakers? Page 75 AujsbJ11 MS. MURRAY: No registered speakers. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do we have any more questions of staff? I'll close the public hearing. What is the pleasure of the board? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I'll offer a motion this time, that we recommend approval for this Petition VA- 2001 -AR- 1138 -- COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Second. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: -- to the BCC acting as the Board of Zoning Adjustments. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Board of Zoning Appeals. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Appeals. Excuse me. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Second. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We have a motion by Mr. Richardson and a second by Mr. Pedone to approve this petition. Any further discussion? All those in favor say aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Those opposed, same sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Motion carries. Thank you. Do we have any old business? That's the end of our public hearings. Any new business? MS. MURRAY: I just have a couple of announcements. I handed out to you -- there's a Collier County logo in a packet: ''mat is the draft commissioner introductory packet that you've asked for. And rather than -- we're going to bind it and everything, but rather than do that first, I thought we'd pass that out, have you take a look, comment. Feel free to write on it and/or send me an e -mail, or if you want to discuss it at the next meeting, that's fine. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Excellent. Thank you. Page 76 Augusti62D01 MS. MURRAY: The other thing I had to hand out was the NAICS books we ordered for you. Unfortunately, I only brought four instead of five. I'll bring the next one -- COMMISSIONER PEDONE: I already have mine. MS. MURRAY: You have yours? COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Yeah. I found Ray in the hallway, and he gave me one. MS. MURRAY: That's right. I'm sorry. Thank you. And this is really going to become pertinent for the second LDC cycle -- not the special cycle, which is next, but the second LDC cycle -- when we take a look at converting the C -1 through C -5 districts to the NAICS. So you don't have to worry about looking at that right now, but you will need that for the future. We also have ordered the SIC code books for you, and as soon as they come in, I'll bring those in. I think that's all I have. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do we have any -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Just in new business. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: New business? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Perhaps a thread to old. I'm very concerned about how we deal with the conserved or to -be- conserved spaces in our -- in our county, as I'm sure we all are. I'm seeing cracks, if you will, in the way our zoning code is being applied relative to giving density credits. And I know the attorney has views on this, and I know there's a lot of issues. I have found out, with the help of staff, that there are counties in Florida that do not use gross acreage. They deduct sensitive lands and other things before they apply the intensity or density, and I plan to pursue those to clarify just what those conditions are and whether they could be applied here in our county. So I guess in short, I'm asking for the board, and particularly as we get our newer members on and we get a full complement, that we Page 77 Augur 0,4JI try to set some sort of agenda that would permit us to have a workshop and have some -- a fuller discussion with staff and others that could help us understand this and perhaps lead us in -- away from the error of our ways or perhaps to new vistas of opportunity to preserve things in the county and not make things necessarily more intense. And that would be my interest, to see if there's some way we could do that. So I request that through the chair. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Okay. So we could possibly have a workshop with reference to the intensity when it comes to commercial and the density when it comes to residential. And, of course, we do have to remember the big picture of where we are in the urban area. And part of our goal in this county, the way I understand it, is to sort of create -- not create a problem on the rural fringes and not overly intensely develop out in our rural areas. So there is some logic to intensifying in your urban area versus intensifying, or even developing to any great degree, out near rural areas. So we will have, a number of times, an opportunity to discuss this, I believe, again, through the Land Development Code and maybe even a workshop. MS. STUDENT: I think what we would need would be a workshop because if the TDR process is going to be, you know, utilized -- and we don't know that yet, but -- because the economist is looking at it -- for the rural fringe, that will involve having receiving areas that may -- I'm just saying may -- be in the urban area. So that will also result in an intensification by changing that density, if this program goes forward, and retiring it, I guess you could say, from an area in the fringe. And part of that receiving area may be in the urban area. It may be in areas of the fringe where, you know, there's nothing really to preserve. That's not known yet because that's under study, and we had our first meeting with the economist just a couple days ago. Page 78 F] AuguJlN, 44 But those are things that, I think, that we need to keep in mind and maybe somehow, if we can, you know, work in tandem because I do -- staff, I hope, agree with me, but I see a relationship between, you know, what actually works as a mini TDR on a given piece of property and the larger issue of the larger TDR process. So I think we need to, you know, keep that going and keep -- and look at it together. And that's not to say that there could be a legal problem with just using net density, but it's an area that we do need to look at and make sure that there is not one; or if there is one, if we want to pay for that some way. That's all. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: And can I make a suggestion? That on behalf of Commissioner Priddy and Commissioner Russell, that you do that, maybe, after October. COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: I think that's a good suggestion. We want a full complement of people that will be able to follow through on whatever the -- CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Right. I think that is a good suggestion, the waiting until after October, maybe even into November. MS. MURRAY: We would also -- I would concur with Marjorie, and we would need to look at the schedule for the rural fringe issues as well and just kind of keep that in mind. So we'll take a look at that and then maybe suggest a time frame and see if that's acceptable to you. I would need everything -- I would prefer to have all your issues out in writing to me so that if there is some research that we need to do or things of that nature, that we could be aware of that before we -- COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: Is an e -mail acceptable? MS. MURRAY: Sure. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: Do we have any public comment? No public comment. Page 79 Augustil01 No discussion of addenda. Do we have a motion to adjourn? COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON: So moved. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Second. CHAIRMAN RAUTIO: We have a motion and a second. We are adj ourned. Thank you. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 11:20 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION JOYCEANNA J. RAUTIO, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY BARBARA DRESCHER, NOTARY PUBLIC Page 80 Fiala Cart Henning =' Mac'Kie COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION August 28, 2001 Meeting Notice PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 Rural Fringe Assessment Area Oversight Committee A meeting of the Rural Fringe Area Assessment Oversight Committee has been scheduled for Wednesday, September 12, 2001 at 3:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at Development Services Center, Conference Room "E ", 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. Enclosed please find an agenda for the meeting. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at the Collier County Planning Services Department (941- 659 - 5737). Linda BaAe* Planning Technician II Misc, Corres: Date'. L -;X � JD ltemJ t �� ^s TO. PHONE (941) 403 -2400 ��� �_ FAX (941) 643 -6968 www.co.collier.fl.us 16J1 *Draft RURAL FRINGE AREA ASSESSMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AGENDA MEETING DATE: September 12, 2001 MEETING TIME: 3:30 p.m. LOCATION: Development Services Center Conference Room "E" 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 8, 2001 - Revised August 29, 2001 III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. OLD BUSINESS A) Discussion of Senate Bill 1922: Richard Woodruff V. NEW BUSINESS A) Discussion of Draft GOP Language: "Density Blending ", "Minimum Clearing Standards" and "Buffers" VI. FUTURE MEETING DATES September 26, 2001 October 10, and 24, 2001 November 7, 14, and 28, 2001 December 5, and 12, 2001 VII. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT VIII. ADJOURNMENT *Draft �16JI ji F�\ RURAL FRINGE AREA ASSESSMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MINUTES August 29, 2001 Members Present Members Absent Ty Agoston David Bryant David Ellis Gary Hayes Dawn Jantsch Patrick Miller Chuck Mohlke Ray Pelletier Kathy Prosser County Staff Present Others Present Linda Bedtelyon, Planning Services Bruce Anderson Mac Hatcher, Natural Resources Dept. Maureen Bonness Stan Litsinger, Comp. Planning Manager Gary Chensoff Bill Lorenz, Natural Resources Director Commissioner Coletta Ann Marie Saylor, Public Utilities Brad Cornell Marjorie Student, Assistant Co. Attorney Robert E. Davenport Robert Duane Tim Hancock Commissioner Henning Mitch Hutchcraft Bob Mulhere John Norman Kathleen Slebodnik Eric Staats CALL TO ORDER (Item I.) The meeting was held at Development Dervices Center, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, Conference Room "E ". Chairman, David Ellis called to order at 3:40 p.m. with a quorum present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Item II.) David moves to approve the August 8, 2001 meeting minutes, and discussion follows; Ray Pelletier requests changes, staff duly notes and will submit revision to committee for next meeting; Chuck Mohlke motions to adopt the minutes provisionally with Ray agreeing to submit amended language; Ty Agoston seconds, and the motion passes unanimously, 9:0. Ty Agoston comments on previously adopted minutes, noting his 'ongoing concern" about public input and 16J1 the role of the committee as part of the public input process; David comments that he's "not uncomfortable with the progress we've made" and is encouraged by the amount of public awareness of the study; APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Item III.) Several changes to the agenda were made: Ray Pelletier requests discussion of Big Corkscrew Island Community petition be added to "New Business" (C), Stan Litsinger presentation of TDR information to be sent to Dr. Nicholas "New Business" (A), Discussion of Schedule and Work Assignments, " New Business" (B); "New Business" (D) addition: Mitigation Discussion; "Old Business ", item (B) Discussion of Senate Bill 1922, deferred until next meeting; Gary Hayes moves to approve amended agenda, seconded and approved unanimously, 9:0. OLD BUSINESS (Item IV.) Election of Vice -Chair for Rural Fringe Committee: Chuck Mohlke nominates Patrick Miller, Patrick accepts; David calls for further nominations and receiving none, calls the question; the committee votes unanimously, 9:0 to elect Patrick Miller as Vice - Chairman; David comments that he will be absent from the next scheduled meeting; NEW BUSINESS (Item V.A.) Stan Litsinger introduces Jean Jourdan, Planner with Comprehensive staff, who presents mapped detail identifying sales data (between years 1998 - present) of parcels in the proposed Sending and Receiving Areas as part of the information requested by Dr. Nicholas; the data is contained on spreadsheets, coordinating with maps, which will be sent to Dr. Nicholas as a data set for his Transfer of Development Rights model; Stan notes that "we identified, initially, for the Study purposes, in the Urban Area alone, using 10 acre parcels or larger that are currently un -zoned or agriculturally zoned, 10,000 acres that could potentially be receiving area for TDRs in the Urban Area alone; that's not including what we already know about the areas A, B, C, and D of the Rural Fringe Study Area or the 1, 200 acres out in Orangetree "; Stan also comments that Dr. Nicholas will be evaluating both the committee and staffs scenarios; David Ellis comments, "one of the real principals of "smart growth" is encouraging urban infill and in order to really make urban infill work on these smaller parcels, density's going to be critical and I think housing issues will change a good bit as we look at the Urban Area, as the prices go up and the demand stays the same, people are going to be looking at denser development in the Urban Area and I think that's one of the things we want to create good opportunity for people to take advantage of, so we don't push as much of that out into the rural area, that's probably a summary of (one of the reasons) why we're here "...Bob Mulhere concurs, "that's a very important point and the structure of the TDR program, we talked about creating that so that its attractive to take units out of the highest environmentally sensitive land first... "; Tim Hancock comments that," the Environmental Advisory Council is considering an ordinance that may limit you to only impacting 5% of your wetlands; I just want to make you aware that there's something separate going on out there, that Dr. Nicholas needs to be aware of in looking at TDRs'; Dawn Jantsch asks if staff is going to make him aware of that; Bob Mulhere responds that, "as a policy determination, we've got to resolve how we're going to treat wetlands; Nicholas is aware of the fact that basically, there are wetlands everywhere in Collier County, in what's left "; David asks Jean to provide copies of the data to Ty Agoston, Gary Hayes, and Ray Pelletier at their request; 16J1 (Item V.B.) Discussion of Schedule and Work Assignments: Bob Mulhere references Memo from Stan Litsinger of projected schedule of Tasks, Issues, Responsibilities, and anticipated meeting dates; Bob says the he sees the most aggressive work to be done by the committee over the next 2 -3 months would be reviewing and responding to draft language from the staff on GMP amendments, recognizing that those that coincide with the Nicholas report will come later; Bob says staff will try to get draft language on "Density Blending, Minimum Clearing Allowances" to committee before next meeting (a week before next meeting); Bob also says Dr. Nicholas will be present to the committee in late September with an interim report; Gary Hayes asks if the committee can have access to the report before Dr. Nicholas arrives in order to prepare for the discussion; Ray Pelletier and Ty Agoston voice concerns about the TDR program being the only incentive for property owner's protection; Bob responds that the Governor's Growth Management Study Commission and resulting SB 1922 (Rural Lands Stewardship Act and Rural and Family Lands Protection Act) adoption has addressed those concerns as well; Bob responds to comments by Kathy Prosser, saying "TDRs are not the only mechanism that we're proposing to use to compensate property owners; we started out with basic concepts of clustering, a huge benefit to property owners, to off -set preservation (standards); we're also talking about provisions to extend central water and sewer into the receiving areas which will further accommodate clustering and natural resource protection; as far as NRPAs go .... acquisition is a legitimate option; outright purchase of the land, at fair market value; conversely, you may sell your development rights, retain your land and still enjoy some uses on that land; it's a viable option "; Bob says that Bill Lorenz and staff have been working on narrowing the preservation standards down to possibly a maximum of five, since considering the idea of Sending and Receiving areas and those different standards; Bill comments that he and Mac have been crunching numbers and should be ready with new data the latter part of September; "The advantage of the concept," says Bill, "is that we get to propose a set of standards for the Receiving Areas that's probably going to be a lot less restrictive than the standards that we developed on the A, B,C, and D areas "; Discussion continued around the draft schedule with Bruce Anderson commenting that "Acquisition" should be added to the list of issues for consideration; he also pointed out the need to include the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) Transmittal date to the calendar; Bob Mulhere notes; Chuck Mohlke suggests moving to discussion of future meeting dates; the committee agrees; FUTURE MEETING DATES (Item VI.) A tentative schedule through the end of the year is reached: September 26 October 10 and 24; Dr. Nicholas interim report, tentatively, October 3 November 7, 14, 28 December 5 and 12 (Item V.C.) Discussion of Big Corkscrew Island Community opposition petition: Ray Pelletier comments on the Naples Daily News article concerns and petition in regard to receiving area; Maureen Bonness, property owner and resident distributes a copy of Memo to Commissioner Coletta and Rural Fringe Committee with petition signature results to date; the memo states" the 16J1 owners and residents of Big Corkscrew Island Community are petitioning Collier County to keep the housing density of their community at no more than one dwelling per five acres'; David Ellis asks for staff comment; Bob Mulhere says, 1 there ' s a concern out there, but we don't even have a policy fleshed out, it's just a concept right now; g it's a legitimate concern, but we have an obligation to those property owners out there to have a really specific plan so that they can react to it; it's hard to say whether someone thinks this is a good idea or a bad idea until they really know what the idea is "; David encourages Maureen Bonness to participate in the regular Rural Fringe Committee meetings as well as the meeting with Dr. Nicholas; Ms. Bonness comments, "I was hoping to get into the planning side, not the reaction side"; Bob responds, "the point is, through the Nicholas analysis, we may find that we have such a large area to accept transfer of development, that we don't really need to include Corkscrew, for example, and if the folks in Corkscrew don't want to be included and we don't need to include them, why would we do that ? "; David thanks Ms. Bonness for her comments; (Item V.B.) Mitigation discussion: Chuck Mohlke asks Bill Lorenz if the preliminary draft of the "Uniform Assessment Procedure is still in the comment period; Bill replies, "yes; we will be utilizing this methodology once it gets adopted, so we're purposing as staff, to use it "; David comments that he sent a letter to Thomas Sansbury, EAC Chairman at the request of the Rural Fringe Committee; he summarizes, "we're waiting on the Nicholas study to talk about TDRs; once we get the study, we'll talk about TDRs; the EAC, the public at large, everybody's welcome to be a part of that discussion "; GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT (Item VII.) David calls for general public comment; Dawn Jantsch and the committee thank Commissioner Henning and Commissioner Coletta for their attendance; ADJOURNMENT (item Vill.) David motions to adjourn, seconded by Patrick Miller; the committee unanimously agrees and the meeting concludes at 5:35 p.m. A taped and hard copy of these minutes in final form are available at the Clerk of Courts, Minutes and Records Office, Building F, Collier County Government Complex and can also be viewed at www.nasites.com /collier on the Rural Assessments page 16J1 MEMORANDUM DATE: Thursday, September 6, 2001 TO: Rural Fringe Committee FROM: Stan Litsing CP,Comprehensive Planning Manager RE: Revised Schedule; Outstanding Issues & Development of GMP Amendment Language As was discussed at the August 8`h and August 29`h Committee meetings, in order to fully evaluate and incorporate the report and recommendations from Jim Nicholas, Ph.D., and to allow for sufficient time for public review and input, staff has revised the projected schedule for transmittal and adoption of GMP amendments for the Rural Fringe Area. The revised Schedule is as follows: Table I: Rural Fringe Committee Timeline ' Duration is the amount of calendar days measured from the date on which the task commenced or is projected to commence through the Rural Fringe Committee meeting date at which the issue or task is projected to be completed. 16J1 10. BCC Transmittal Hearing 1 02/20/02 02/20/02 N /A` 11. Objection, Recommendation & 65 02/27/02 05/01/02' Comment Report from DCA . 12. CCPC Adoption Hearing 1 05/23/02 05/23/02 13. BCC Adoption Hearing 1 06/11/02 06/11/02 Total Days to Projected 205 4, z M Total Days to Projected) 310 Adoption There is much work yet to de done in order to meet this schedule. Staff and Bob Mulhere, the County's Planning Consultant, have begun to write GMP amendments. These amendments will initially focus on issues that are not, to a significant degree, dependent upon or likely to be impacted by the work being conducted by Dr. Nicholas. Based upon of discussions last week, Table II provides a preliminary list of proposed amendments, the principal individual assigned to develop the respective draft, and the anticipated date by which the respective GMP language will be brought to the Committee in draft format for review and comment. Please note that these "issues" are listed in order of those least likely to be impacted by Dr. Nicholas' evaluation, to those that almost certainly will need to be developed with Dr, Nicholas recommendations in hand. 2 At this point, the Committee's work is complete. Nevertheless, the Committee will understandably want to be kept informed of the BCC action and subsequent Objection, Recommendation and Comment Report form DCA. 3 It is understood that in drafting all GMP language, input shall be requested from the County Attorney's Office and from The County's outside legal counsel, Carlton Fields, et al. 4 These are target dates and may vary. 14. 15. 16. 17. 16J1 Outstanding Issues: There are several outstanding issues or areas of separation between the staff recommendation and the Committee recommendation. Staff is optimistic that these issues can be resolved and that consensus can be achieved. The following is a list of these issues: Preservation Standards Preservation Incentives Mitigation Standards NRPA Boundaries (particularly North Belle Meade) Wetland Protection Standards and (to a lesser degree) Habitat Protection Standards TDRs & Delineation of Sending and Receiving Areas It does not make sense to attempt to resolve the TDR/Sending and Receiving Areas or Preservation Incentives, at this time since those issues are dependent upon Dr. Nicholas' evaluation. Additionally, staff understands that the single largest landowner in the North Bell Meade is currently working with his legal, land use and other consultants to evaluate potential options related to protection measures on the most valuable environmental lands under his ownership. It will be several weeks before the property owner (or his representative) is in a position to discuss this issue with staff and the Committee. Therefore it would not be productive to spend time on this issue at this point in time. Based upon this information, staff recommends that staff and the Committee further examine the following outstanding issues, in order of priority, over the next 2 to 4 meetings in an attempt to achieve consensus. 3 Hancock Institutional Uses, FLUE, FLUM Mulhere, Litsinger, October 24, 2001 (schools) Commercial, Weeks Industrial, etc. Emergency FLUE, FLUM Mulhere, Weeks November 7, 2001 Preparedness NRPA or other FLUE, FLUM, CCME Lorenz/Hatcher November 7, 2001 Resource Protection Boundaries Preservation Standards FLUE, CCME? Lorenz November 7, 2001 Density Incentives FLUE, FLUM Mulhere, Lorenz November 14, 2001 (Bonuses) Wetland Protection CCME, FLUE Lorenz November 14, 2001 Standards TDRs /sending & FLUE, FLUM Mulhere November 28, 2001 receiving & acquisition ALL Mulhere, Lorenz, December 5, 2001 Wrap -up Litsinger, Student Wrap -up continued ALL Mulhere, Lorenz, December 12, 2001 Litsinger, Student Outstanding Issues: There are several outstanding issues or areas of separation between the staff recommendation and the Committee recommendation. Staff is optimistic that these issues can be resolved and that consensus can be achieved. The following is a list of these issues: Preservation Standards Preservation Incentives Mitigation Standards NRPA Boundaries (particularly North Belle Meade) Wetland Protection Standards and (to a lesser degree) Habitat Protection Standards TDRs & Delineation of Sending and Receiving Areas It does not make sense to attempt to resolve the TDR/Sending and Receiving Areas or Preservation Incentives, at this time since those issues are dependent upon Dr. Nicholas' evaluation. Additionally, staff understands that the single largest landowner in the North Bell Meade is currently working with his legal, land use and other consultants to evaluate potential options related to protection measures on the most valuable environmental lands under his ownership. It will be several weeks before the property owner (or his representative) is in a position to discuss this issue with staff and the Committee. Therefore it would not be productive to spend time on this issue at this point in time. Based upon this information, staff recommends that staff and the Committee further examine the following outstanding issues, in order of priority, over the next 2 to 4 meetings in an attempt to achieve consensus. 3 16J1 Preservation Standards Mitigation Standards Wetland Protection Standards At the September 24, 2001 meeting staff can be prepared to bring back to the Committee a draft preservation policy that is a hybrid of the Preservation Policies developed to date and which, in the opinion of staff, would address the concerns raised by the committee with the current staff recommendation for preservation standards. Generally, the preservation policy would be structured as follows. Create a set of preservation standards for sending lands which: - Either varies from subdistrict to subdistrict (A, B, C & D) based upon the existing data for the respective subdistrict, or; Is a singular set of preservation standards for all sending areas, regardless of which subdistrict the sending lands are located in; and Create a singular set of preservation standards for all receiving areas, regardless of which subdistrict the receiving lands are located in. This would allow for the development of preservation standards in receiving lands that is based on the cumulative data analysis for all receiving lands, excluding data from sending lands. This will allow for lower preservation standards in receiving lands, and, conversely, a higher preservation standard in sending lands, where the most valuable resources and habitat are located.) Staff recommends that Mitigation standards and wetland protection standards be revisited again by the committee at the Committee's October meetings. Final Comments: It is clear that there is a great deal of work to be done if we are to meet the deadlines established in the Final Order and complete our task in an exemplary and timely manner. Staff understands that the committee consists of civic minded individuals who voluntarily give up there time to serve for the betterment of the community at large. We are grateful for your service and are respectful of your time, but it is likely that additional committee meetings will be necessary over the next 4 -5 months. Cc: John Dunnuck, Interim Community Dev. & Env. Services Administrator Nancy Linnan, Esquire, Carlton Fields Jack Sullivan, Carlton Fields William Lorenz, P.E., Natural Resources Director Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney David Weeks, AICP, Chief Planner Bob Mulhere, AICP, Director of Planning, RWA, Inc. 4 'Draft 16J1 RURAL FRINGE AREA ASSESSMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: MEETING TIME: LOCATION: AGENDA September 26, 2001 3:30 p.m. Development Services Center Conference Room "E" 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 12, 2001 III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. OLD BUSINESS V. NEW BUSINESS Discussion of Draft GOP Language: "Minimum Clearing Standards" "Buffers" VI. FUTURE MEETING DATES October 10, and 24, 2001 November 7, 14, and 28, 2001 December 5, and 12, 2001 VII. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT VIII. ADJOURNMENT V Fiala Carter I 6J1 _.-- -_ - Vk=2160 COLLIER COt` TY GO iRENMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION September 13, 2001 PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 Meeting Notice Rural Fringe Assessment Area Oversight Committee A meeting of the Rural Fringe Area Assessment Oversight Committee has been scheduled for Wednesday, September 26, 2001 at 3:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at Development Services Center, Conference Room "E ", 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. Enclosed please find an agenda for the meeting. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at the Collier County Planning Services Department (941- 659 - 5737). Linda Bedwl) i Planning Technician II Misc. Corres: Date: Item# Codes To: PHONE (941) 403 - 2400 FAX (941) 643 -6968 www.co.collier.Mus *Draft 16J1 RURAL FRINGE AREA ASSESSMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MINUTES September 12, 2001 Members Present Members Absent Ty Agoston David Bryant (exc.) Gary Hayes David Ellis (exc.) Dawn Jantsch Kathy Prosser (exc.) Patrick Miller Chuck Mohlke Ray Pelletier County Staff Present Others Present Linda Bedtelyon, Planning Services Bruce Anderson Mac Hatcher, Natural Resources Dept. Roy Anderson Stan Litsinger, Comprehensive Ping. Manager Vince Cautero Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney Brad Cornell Shannon Cromwell Robert Duane Bill Hill David Key Walt Kozlowsky Bob Mulhere Nancy Payton Eric Staats CALL TO ORDER (Item I.) The meeting was held at Development Services Center, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, Conference Room "E ". Vice - chairman, Patrick Miller called to order at 3:40 p.m. with a quorum present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Item II.) August 8, 2001 meeting minutes revisions were approved, 6:0, following a motion by Ray Pelletier, seconded by Chuck Mohlke; August 29, 2001 meeting minutes Item V.B. comment by Bruce Anderson corrected to: the draft schedule needs to include the "Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC)t% date "; Chuck Mohlke motions to approve the minutes with amendment, Gary Hayes seconds, and the committee agrees unanimously, 6:0. 16J1 APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Item III.) Chuck Mohike moves to approve the agenda with amendment to "Old Business, Item IV.A" to reflect the "Discussion of Senate Bill 1922" led by Robert Duane, instead of Richard Woodruff; Ray Pelletier seconds, and the committee approves the motion, 6:0. OLD BUSINESS (Item IV.) Discussion of Senate Bill 1922: Robert Duane distributes outline (provided by Richard Woodruff) of the "Rural and Family Lands Protection Act" and the "Rural Land Stewardship Act and briefly reviews with committee; Bob Mulhere comments, " there probably are some applications of the Rural and Family Lands Protection Act, providing there is funding available at the state level, relative to acquisition of sensitive lands in the Rural Fringe'; The Rural Lands Stewardship Act, which allows for five trial areas throughout the state to be classified, "Rural Land Stewardship Areas" by meeting specific criteria, "may be something applicable to the eastern "Rural Lands" study and may be something that we'd want to pursue; I think there are some real good tools of reference, we should keep them in mind and develop some objectives to further these goals "; NEW BUSINESS (Item V.) Discussion of Draft GOP Language: "Density Blending ": Bob Mulhere takes committee through proposed recommendations to the Growth Management Plan, Future Land Use Element (FLUE); Bob says, were only proposing to allow extension of central sewer and water into receiving areas, and that's another reason why we don't want to put additional density into these sending areas, which we've identified as being high in valuable natural resources'; Bob concludes with committee's input, to revise language to stipulate sub - districts, to omit the Big Corkscrew and North Belle Meade Sub - Districts, and that the "committee discussion contributed significantly to the formation of drafts "; Bob comments that the committee members should feel free to contact himself, Stan Litsinger, or Bill Lorenz with any questions or comments on the draft proposals; Patrick Miller calls for any further discussion of the item, including public comment; Chuck Mohlke motions, "that the committee adopt the recommendations with the changes in bullet point number one on pages 3 of 4 that excises Big Corkscrew sub - district and North Belle Meade sub - district from the first bullet point, and for the fifth bullet point, "the project is currently zoned to a Planned Unit Development" and to adopt all the underlined sections with those amendments under Roman (numeral) II, A. 1., A through the conclusion on page 4; Dawn Jantsch seconds the motion; Bob Mulhere proposes to revise the language of the "project shall meet the higher preservation standards of the sub - districts and probably spell out the two, wherein the project lies" (page 4 of 4, bullet); also, Patrick Miller clarifies that Bob will add a paragraph that specifies the committee's input with regard to drafting the language; the committee passes the motion, 5:1, with Ty Agoston opposing; Patrick reiterates, " please look at the "Buffering" package that has been added to your folder (binders provided with drafts to all committee members); that will be a topic for the next meeting on the 26th "; FUTURE MEETING DATES (Item VI.) No discussion GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 16J1 (Item VII.) Gary Hayes asks if the "Minimum Clearing Standards" draft will be discussed; the committee agrees to discuss at next meeting; Chuck Mohlke acknowledges the maps identifying the Sending, Receiving and Neutral TDR Areas Mac Hatcher has provided the committee; Mac comments they are for future reference; Bob Mulhere comments that staff will try to get a color version of the maps to the committee, that ultimately will be the precursor toward a series of Future Land Use maps that will get adopted; ADJOURNMENT (Item VIII.) Patrick Miller calls for motion to adjourn, Chuck Mohlke moves, and committee agrees unanimously. The meeting concludes at 4:57 p.m. A taped and hard copy of these minutes in final form are available at the Clerk of Courts, Minutes and Records Office, Building F, Collier County Government Complex, minutes may also be viewed on the website: www.nasites.com /collier, Rural Assessments page 16J1 �, *y bn 15 .2 o o p o o v ct Q V) ct cs bQ p O • b��A � 'C7 � � O Q' � Q O �'"' � O .� cu p cn +' cd ou ct ti C p cd U V ` Q to W ° o 'd U Y O U O •, U N cd O cd O� rn N O ct to O O 'd N O p :� O Z cd cad U> N --. () b IS I� o cl a cd U C's w C13 'b Ems- 'cl o o cUd ^~ vi ten, In U N o p ° o ? o .O s.. N �°, y o.�fs, � 95, E� 0-4 wd..� cdti ro 0 0 4-4 h O N vUi O U Q ch 6" U) ^mod Q, m bb In P. a" C:) CD C:) c) Cl C7 O O p 2 OC13 000 � v rte, obi .� p C a> U • i. cd ,-" cn CA ct U 3 iC p 0 14 Ln 64 Ln ej a N U 0 N� CA ^ to N cz r w U vl p U O O cn O N cd Cd rU En N c O rp� O p N O Op in i1 ;:I y N V i� pVj O+ U O U O� 7F N O Y •v + '� ) O N Q, ct -0 x Q w O O O b 'C3 $-4 'L3 W N M d ti O �r 0 7j � N 'd ��/' � ►: 0 � cd U � � O O � � U O ^1 0.1 Cif cd cd ¢ + N v� in o' a cxr' w: +Q 0 0 0� h 0 0 obi d R sue.' a �A m �01 ti 0 ti rt O Q; �v or, o �1 RS PLO C7 U rA aro c� e� 0 C7 U c� a> U b U 0 0 a 16J1 w s y O H i 0 U 0 U U d w f.•' a�i Qo "'d G '^ N U W O •w H 3 N E-h � r. ^O W - tea, as Ln � o cn o v 3 V o COO a3 cl, v ° cn o En y W F-y •�•r ° ^ LI:! U w C cn ia U �I U0 OU O �I a o b °" w s y O H i o 0; W �U ti 0.1 �1 cA♦ O W TV O 16J1 r U 4i w h h p, V V G'. .ti N Q CKI �Y. O ra O N Y ti Y f,H Q� ul b N U H cn := O 0 O c� cd p O W u ~ cd C� Y W W Q% U) Y O 73 Fri Y 1 h Y�i ce cl cl N `n N O 16J1 r U 4i w h h p, V V 1 �q o-0 o� V o� v O .G Q v 0� bQ' O cd b a� O N W I 6J1 I=,wll�i13� vo,� 0 0 0 0 0 C) kn o to o O N O [— O O ^ H N �n 0 x 0 0 N N x Q w O a bq �v >������ o U) bEn o � o o H •� bin Q n � cr 0 to IN cd ° N N U _ O cd �' to A, b b V N VE _ O cd N N p E 64 .° sU, �.� C,3 � �' U bD'�, � o a� a� O 10 M .� 64 ' ( ° o �.+ "3 O bn �_ .O O E 4 cr Q) Q. Q. b CA Ln �:!O CA O > U U O m vUi cd b a� O N W I 6J1 I=,wll�i13� vo,� 0 0 0 0 0 C) kn o to o O N O [— O O ^ H N �n 0 x 0 0 N N x Q w O a bq �v f�l 4r y w 's 4 bA O O p V ' cl "Cl , 'd L � � •U� p v AO� aj p �� Cd Z En H O is it g vi U .o 4- R > ° c`', �o a3 rTly tz, o �, o �, a 'r.4 o bD vi o V O � y •" 0.� O N V 'rn V an Q En "C p O p O O .� b y O Q p cd bb 40 •--i cd cl J` O cad a� Q cd � w ca'd o o v o 41 vn cd �" b O N N ~— 'C'n v cu N 424 4 ct O .-- ? ¢Nb �b o �' b o o �' Cd -(n cz o a� o ° o aoi o Q, +- w b o a� ou can) cad a� a� c e ¢, o m o Q o 0 0 0 cd N Oi cd cd Q O� N N tp Q O a +� O 'd N lc� CL 00 � O �.� O bn 4. 9b sm. N 3y w N En �d b ■ ■ Q. cn O O 0 M v 'u t1• O: o 0 •G O a � G y w V � v� y � b 0 � O f�l 4r y w 's 4 bA O O p V ' cl "Cl , 'd L � � •U� p v AO� aj p �� Cd Z En H O is it g vi U .o 4- R > ° c`', �o a3 rTly tz, o �, o �, a 'r.4 o bD vi o V O � y •" 0.� O N V 'rn V an Q En "C p O p O O .� b y O Q p cd bb 40 •--i cd cl J` O cad a� Q cd � w ca'd o o v o 41 vn cd �" b O N N ~— 'C'n v cu N 424 4 ct O .-- ? ¢Nb �b o �' b o o �' Cd -(n cz o a� o ° o aoi o Q, +- w b o a� ou can) cad a� a� c e ¢, o m o Q o 0 0 0 cd N Oi cd cd Q O� N N tp Q O a +� O 'd N lc� CL 00 � O �.� O bn 4. 9b sm. N 3y w N En �d b ■ ■ Q. cn O O 0 M v 'u t1• O: o v' O 4� O v �O Q •v 0� O d4 � � O A w a au GA e� c� a 3 0 s. L L R G> a� .d a O Or O a 16J1 b O � cu w O A Cd o +- N O U -- � o w 4° (A E o Co O 6 cl -d O bo U V �� off•° 3�,� ��° ° o m o o a W a�i � co, d � Q v ,O— O •y r h Q rn vi O U +CA v O "� CIS U" 0..4 W N cd 'C7 .fl O := m O 40. � O cl cC 0 c c7 I.M O o � 05 �. 4: Con h y � Z U H O O O b V��W S1 bb cd W a d' 4 �A A� ti a° V �w 4� C3 b4 V► � O 16J1 r-L CL ~ p p O N rte. r �+ ~ +�-+ ►- O + Cd b N N -- cd O O C V 0 00 v N N cd U scd, O UO N O 3 '� r. O O a� O U O U O co UvUi cd .� C's .b U ct N U cis N � : cd > ^O �� - ��1 p Y�-i O i--+ .^$ V I•-il ice. '~ h+1" 0 Qi Q) 14UI CL U +� (� b o 'c� rc a> O w v� sue- U O O b ') >I z ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ o G' w" OI' v h' h O O c o� 0 on O a Qn v � O a3 f N U .+. � +r Or aY •� CJ O� cyd cd tm+ o b U o UO•° CIS 3 o C4 r Cd a, En o C�� bf 60 � Q) U � .� O U .y cd O i"j. O cUd n. t � 'n i v o cC s" � cd H U b O cc3 ¢ y ■ Cd En U ° Q) > 16J1 Uarc� � U � U U � � U O � � O O � � � � b U O � � O � 64 �� N to O O •� U p, U to U � y U tn. O ai s.w Av a> Cd .O bA -d A r 0 w o won M o U L" U r•-� 0 O C' *DrafbRevised 8.29.01 Approved 9.12. 01 Final Fiala �."_... Carter Henning Mac'Kle _ Colette —�— 16J1 RURAL FRINGE AREA ASSESSMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MINUTES August 8, 2001 Members Present Members Absent David Ellis Ty Agoston (exc.) Gary Hayes David Bryant (exc.) Dawn Jantsch Patrick Miller (exc.) Chuck Mohlke Ray Pelletier Kathy Prosser County Staff Present Others Present Linda Bedtelyon, Planning Services Larry Basik Mac Hatcher, Natural Resources Dept. Maureen Bonness Bill Lorenz, Natural Resources Director Vince Cautero Margie Student, Assistant Co. Atty. Gary Colecchio David Weeks, Chief Planner Comm. Jim Coletta Brad Cornell Robert Duane Tim Durham Beth Grapengeter Tim Hancock John Hinson Joe Howard Chris Johnson Andrew Mackie Bob Mulhere Maxine Shafer Kathleen Slebodnik Eric Staats Richard Woodruff CALL TO ORDER (Item I.) The meeting was held at Development Services Center, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, Conference Room "E ". Chairman, David Ellis unofficially calls to order at approximately 3:45 p.m. without a quorum present. David introduces Tim Durham, Director of Environmental Services at WilsonMiller, to begin mitigation discussion; Tim comments that for purposes of discussion, he wil rim rily speak to the "wetland" mitigation issue; he explains generally the permitting processV§srrnming project impacts, and where wetland impact is unavoidable, mitigation is required; Tim cites the two permitting agencies that developers must work through as, 1) South FI ®*ft Water It ,.m# E p'ps To: 16J1 Management District ( SFWMD) and 2) The (U.S. Army) Corps of Engineers, and explains their programs' similarities and differences: SFWMD uses ratios to measure wetland impact; the Corps of Engineers uses a "functional assessment" standard, meaning mitigation will equal (wetland) function; Tim refers to the Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (oppaga) document on Wetland Mitigation Policy Review, March 2000, (copies provided to committee members), which is an arm of the legislature that acts as an investigative office that provides research recommendations to the state legislature; the resulting document summarized the need for some changes in the state -wide wetland mitigation process; the legislature has mandated that the state come up with methodology to assess wetland functions for mitigation purposes; there is a draft rule which will define how those functions will be assessed, due to go into affect in January 2002; Chuck Mohlke asks Bill Lorenz to share the rule with the committee; Bill to provide; Tim went on to say the new rule will be similar to what the Corps of Engineers currently uses, called, wetland rapid assessment procedure (RAP), which is a scoring process to grade wetland functions; he explained range of types of mitigation as 1) wetland "enhancement" (one of the most commonly used), 2) wetland "creation ", 3) wetland "preservation" (used in combination with other types of mitigation) and 4) wetland "restoration "; (Commissioner Coletta arrives at 4:05 p.m.) Some mitigation options: Tim demonstrates mapped areas to clarify projects and wetland mitigation determinations, on and off -site, saying that on -site mitigation is preferable; Regional Off -site Mitigation Areas (ROMAs) are pre- identified area(s) for mitigation to be directed to; mitigation bank(s) are pre - permitted site projects that can be mitigated to; smaller pieces of property (single - family homes) create wetland fragmentation, in which off -site mitigation solutions are best used; (such as ROMA); Tim says that recognizing some unique problem - solving is really the best way to go on some projects; Bob Mulhere comments that in keeping with the Final Order and establishing percentages, allow flexibility to encompass protection standards for the highest quality (wetlands); Bill Lorenz adds that the comprehensive protection measures such as the NRPAs, identifying the sending zones, buffers, TDRs, will all be part of the DCAs determinations in wetland protection; Brad Cornell comments that what is to be protected and where are they located ( the wetland systems) needs to be identified and mapped; Tim Durham agrees and says he has been working with SFWMD to come up with maps to address concerns of cumulative impacts(as it relates to going across different basins); David Ellis asks about overlay maps; Bill Lorenz responds that an overlay flow -way area map would be a useful; Tim asks to set up projection of maps in order to continue discussion; David agrees to use time for meeting housekeeping because there is a quorum; APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Item II.) Chuck Mohlke motions to approve the July 18, 2001 meeting minutes, Kathy Prosser seconds, Gary Hayes comments on Tom Conrecode's resignation; motion passes, 6:0. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Item III.) Bill Lorenz adds EAC Action discussion, as well as, schedule to transmit amendments discussion under "New Business "; David revises agenda order, Ray Pelletier comments to discuss Growth Management Policies 30 day update requested by Tom Conrecode; David moves to approve amended agenda, Kathy Prosser seconds, motion passes, 6:0. 16J1 OLD BUSINESS (Item W.A.) Discussion of election of vice - chair: The committee agrees to wait until everyone is present (three members absent today) to decide vice - chairmanship; Kathy Prosser suggests staff contact individual committee members to determine if they have an interest in being vice - chair or a recommendation for the position so a decision can be reached at next meeting; Staff notes; Roy Pelletier states, he withdraws his. name for cons d 'aratidn,* Tim Hancock offers to present his discussion while technicians continue to work to bring up the remaining portion of Tim Durham's mitigation presentation; (Item IV.B) Rural Village Overlay Discussion: Tim Hancock begins his presentation referring to the "Final Order" requirement to "provide creative land -use planning techniques including, but not limited to public and private schools, urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area based allocations, clustering and open space provisions and mixed use development "; Tim says the Eastern Rural Lands Study (committee) is looking at the issue of "new towns" and that in his opinion, there are areas within the Rural Fringe that qualify for consideration for "a more appropriate and new manner of development "; specifically, the nation -wide trend of medium and large scale developments as self- sustaining communities; Tim says that the term "smart growth" is very closely linked with the concepts of urban villages and new towns, consisting of a central, commercial core with a variety of housing types, housing by income, reminiscent of the old, urban villages of the past; Tim states that when he presented his proposal to the BCC, they asked that the Rural Fringe Committee include looking at this (concept) as a part of their deliberations: the creation of a Rural Village Overlay District (DRI) within the Rural Fringe Assessment Area, in concert with standards already discussed by the committee; he goes on to say that this concept would provide an economic alternative to low- density golf course development; he requests that the Rural Fringe committee consider bringing back to its next meeting, specific language (which would be provided in advance) that would permit a property owner to pursue a rural village overlay within the Rural Fringe if they meet certain criteria: project to include at build -out: school sites, central water /sewer, commercial development of a sufficient size to serve the village, preservation of native vegetation or farmland through greenbelts, habitat re- creation if immediately adjacent to natural resource protection areas, true mix of housing providing for a broad spectrum of income levels, a binary public street network with interconnection where appropriate, use of duel water systems for irrigation and restoration of flow -ways where deemed appropriate, minimum size criteria to support commercial node; Chuck Mohlke responds that the TDR sending /receiving areas are still in question and that the economic study about to be undertaken by Dr. Nicholas could include this ingredient for receiving area analysis; Tim states that under the maximum density proposals, (draft conceptual strategies report) the concept of a rural community cannot be achieved; Bob Mulhere suggests that Tim work with staff to incorporate these elements into the overall growth management GOPs; Brad Cornell comments that this "Smart Growth" planning concept should be first applied to our current Urban areas, including Immokalee and Orange Tree, before moving into the Fringe area; Tim responds that there isn't enough available acreage left in the urban areas to support the market; Ray Pelletier motions Tim work with staff to develop (new town concepts) policies to bring back to the committee, Gary Hayes seconds, the motion passes unanimously; 16J1 Bill Lorenz asks to discuss GOP /schedule items: Bill states expected transmittal of GOPs to be February, 2002 with adoption hearings in May or June, 2002; Bill says that staff will be bringing back a schedule of transmittals to EAC and CCPC at next meeting as well as a schedule of items to be accomplished; Bob Mulhere says staff will begin to draft GOP language and bring to committee for deliberation; Bill Lorenz also comments that conceptual points will be brought to committee for work/decision; Tim Durham continues with mitigation discussion, displaying several graphics, demonstrating various maps of flow -ways, protection areas, areas slated for protection; he states, "roughly 80% of the wetlands within the Study Area, are or will be in a protected status" (through acquisition); Chuck Mohlke asks Tim if he could provide a wetland overlay map for the Rural Fringe Study area; Richard Woodruff and Tim say they'll try; Discussion of Senate Bill 1922 tabled until next agenda; NEW BUSINESS (Item V.B.) Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) Action: Bill Lorenz explains TDR Sending /Receiving Areas Recommendations; Memo has been distributed at beginning of meeting: Bill says that the EAC has been receiving updates from both Rural Assessment Committees and their Growth Management Subcommittee has been reviewing materials /recommendations from the committees; The Growth Management Subcommittee has presented the EAC with a proposal of recommendations for each area (A, B, C, and D) within the Rural Fringe Study Area and will address the proposal further at their September 5, 2001 meeting; Area A: Bill points out that the property owner history within portions of Area A has reflected the owner's desire of the zoning 1 house per 5 acres" Ray »�11lt!�:r `��t�rt rtts i";, derts[tyreducd ";(Ray to submif revised language) Richard Woodruff comments that we need to give the consultant (Jim Nicholas) the largest latitude, because if we want that program to work, we can't keep restricting and saying, not here, not here, not here... the people who live in that area ... are not forced to receive additional land... "; Bill Lorenz says," this is additional input from another group that's coming from this material as you developed it out "; Chuck Mohlke says, "There's an important difference here; the one thing I don't want to have happen to the work of this committee is for people seeking friendly venues, to state their views ... we now know that there's an agenda out there; I'm very appreciative that there's an agenda out there, but we need to hear that, or have available to us a transcript of that discussion and a better understanding of what those issues are... ";Bill says," I'm a messenger presenting the information from the EAC, but the other thing is, it's a matter of how do we coordinate best with this, because the EAC is going to be looked at to provide some information, they're reviewing the wetlands policies... "; David Ellis asks Bill to walk committee through rest of memo; Bill explains that Area B: the density of ownership, there's a lot of smaller lots; Kathy Prosser addresses Chairman Ellis, saying "I think this is a dangerous road to go down for this committee ... he said this, she said that, they said this ... and we make mistakes; it seems to me this may be valuable information, but we have no idea for context for why they're thinking this, and it would be a good thing to have them come here and meet with us jointly... "David agrees; he advises that committee read the memo and contact staff (Bill Lorenz) with direct questions "; Dawn Jantsch asks" (Bill ) .... where the priority will be when this finding is all done, which is the commission going to be looking at in terms of recommendations, does one have a priority over another? Why are we meeting ?" Bill responds, " the way I look at it, you all are developing the thrust and direction; 16J1 when that goes out, there's going to be additional public comment and input and the EAC is another advisory board that the county commission looks at; as you work through your process, then you're putting out a proposal, the EAC, at it's earliest opportunity is giving you feed - back..." Richard Woodruff suggests that David Ellis, as acting chairman of the Rural Fringe Committee, contact the EAC requesting that they "respectfully post -pone further discussion on delineating boundaries until the county's study (economic TDR study by Dr. Jim Nicholas) is back and both committees have had a chance to see it and then possibly after that, have a joint meeting "; the committee agrees and so directs David, who consents; Bill explains that the EAC, which is Board (BCC) appointed, has broad responsibilities, so they have input; David responds "we have a job to deliver the final report.... and I'm going to meet with staff tomorrow and try to pull the process together in a little neater way "; FUTURE MEETING DATES (Item VI.) August 22, 2001; September 12th /19th? ADJOURNMENT (Item VIII.) The committee unanimously agreed to adjourn at 5:50 p.m. A taped and hard copy of these minutes in final form are available at the Clerk of Courts, Minutes and Records Office, Building F, Collier County Government Complex and can also be viewed at: www.nasites.com /collier on the Rural Assessments page Fiala V/ Carter ._�...�. Henning I 6JI Mac'Kle Al Colette *Revised 9.12.01 -Final RURAL FRINGE AREA ASSESSMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MINUTES August 29, 2001 Members Present Members Absent Ty Agoston David Bryant David Ellis Gary Hayes Dawn Jantsch Patrick Miller Chuck Mohlke Ray Pelletier Kathy Prosser County Staff Present Others Present Linda Bedtelyon, Planning Services Bruce Anderson Mac Hatcher, Natural Resources Dept. Maureen Bonness Stan Litsinger, Comp. Planning Manager Gary Chensoff Bill Lorenz, Natural Resources Director Commissioner Coletta Ann Marie Saylor, Public Utilities Brad Cornell Marjorie Student, Assistant Co. Attorney Robert E. Davenport Robert Duane Tim Hancock Commissioner Henning Mitch Hutchcraft Bob Mulhere John Norman Kathleen Slebodnik Eric Staats CALL TO ORDER (Item I.) The meeting was held at Development Services Center, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, Conference Room "E ". Chairman, David Ellis called to order at 3:40 p.m. with a quorum present. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Item II.) David moves to approve the August 8, 2001 meeting minutes, and discussion follows; Ray Pelletier requests changes, staff duly notes and will submit revision to cc r Miti% gr next meeting; Chuck Mohlke motions to adopt the minutes provisionally with Ray agreeing r6 submit amended language; Ty Agoston seconds, and the motion passes unanimous! Y, 9:0. Ty Agoston comments on previously adopted minutes, noting his 'ongoing concern" aboL bl e4R Item# Ccy ni;Tc T0. 16J1 the role of the committee as part of the public input process; David comments that he's "not uncomfortable with the progress we've made" and is encouraged by the amount of public awareness of the study; APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Item III.) Several changes to the agenda were made: Ray Pelletier requests discussion of Big Corkscrew Island Community petition be added to "New Business" (C), Stan Litsinger presentation of TDR information to be sent to Dr. Nicholas "New Business" (A), Discussion of Schedule and Work Assignments, " New Business" (B); "New Business" (D) addition: Mitigation Discussion; "Old Business ", item (B) Discussion of Senate Bill 1922, deferred until next meeting; Gary Hayes moves to approve amended agenda, seconded and approved unanimously, 9:0. OLD BUSINESS (Item IV.) Election of Vice -Chair for Rural Fringe Committee: Chuck Mohlke nominates Patrick Miller, Patrick accepts; David calls for further nominations and receiving none, calls the question; the committee votes unanimously, 9:0 to elect Patrick Miller as Vice - Chairman; David comments that he will be absent from the next scheduled meeting; NEW BUSINESS (Item V.A.) Stan Litsinger introduces Jean Jourdan, Planner with Comprehensive staff, who presents mapped detail identifying sales data (between years 1998 - present) of parcels in the proposed Sending and Receiving Areas as part of the information requested by Dr. Nicholas; the data is contained on spreadsheets, coordinating with maps, which will be sent to Dr. Nicholas as a data set for his Transfer of Development Rights model; Stan notes that "we identified, initially, for the Study purposes, in the Urban Area alone, using 10 acre parcels or larger that are currently un -zoned or agriculturally zoned, 10,000 acres that could potentially be receiving area for TDRs in the Urban Area alone; that's not including what we already know about the areas A, B, C, and D of the Rural Fringe Study Area or the 1, 200 acres out in Orangetree "; Stan also comments that Dr. Nicholas will be evaluating both the committee and staffs scenarios; David Ellis comments, "one of the real principals of "smart growth" is encouraging urban infill and in order to really make urban infill work on these smaller parcels, density's going to be critical and I think housing issues will change a good bit as we look at the Urban Area, as the prices go up and the demand stays the same, people are going to be looking at denser development in the Urban Area and I think that's one of the things we want to create good opportunity for people to take advantage of, so we don't push as much of that out into the rural area, that's probably a summary of (one of the reasons) why we're here "...Bob Mulhere concurs, "that's a very important point and the structure of the TDR program, we talked about creating that so that it's attractive to take units out of the highest environmentally sensitive land first... "; Tim Hancock comments that," the Environmental Advisory Council is considering an ordinance that may limit you to only impacting 5% of your wetlands; I just want to make you aware that there's something separate going on out there, that Dr. Nicholas needs to be aware of in looking at TDRs "; Dawn Jantsch asks if staff is going to make him aware of that; Bob Mulhere responds that, "as a policy determination, we've got to resolve how we're going to treat wetlands; Nicholas is aware of the fact that basically, there are wetlands everywhere in Collier County, in what's left "; David asks Jean to provide copies of the data to Ty Agoston, Gary Hayes, and Ray Pelletier at their request; 16J1 (Item V.B.) Discussion of Schedule and Work Assignments: Bob Mulhere references Memo from Stan Litsinger of projected schedule of Tasks, Issues, Responsibilities, and anticipated meeting dates; Bob says the he sees the most aggressive work to be done by the committee over the next 2 -3 months would be reviewing and responding to draft language from the staff on GMP amendments, recognizing that those that coincide with the Nicholas report will come later; Bob says staff will try to get draft language on "Density Blending, Minimum Clearing Allowances" to committee before next meeting (a week before next meeting); Bob also says Dr. Nicholas will be present to the committee in late September with an interim report; Gary Hayes asks if the committee can have access to the report before Dr. Nicholas arrives in order to prepare for the discussion; Ray Pelletier and Ty Agoston voice concerns about the TDR program being the only incentive for property owner's protection; Bob responds that the Governor's Growth Management Study Commission and resulting SB 1922 (Rural Lands Stewardship Act and Rural and Family Lands Protection Act) adoption has addressed those concerns as well; Bob responds to comments by Kathy Prosser, saying "TDRs are not the only mechanism that we're proposing to use to compensate property owners; we started out with basic concepts of clustering, a huge benefit to property owners, to off -set preservation (standards); we're also talking about provisions to extend central water and sewer into the receiving areas which will further accommodate clustering and natural resource protection; as far as NRPAs go,... acquisition is a legitimate option; outright purchase of the land, at fair market value; conversely, you may sell your development rights, retain your land and still enjoy some uses on that land; it's a viable option "; Bob says that Bill Lorenz and staff have been working on narrowing the preservation standards down to possibly a maximum of five, since considering the idea of Sending and Receiving areas and those different standards; Bill comments that he and Mac have been crunching numbers and should be ready with new data the latter part of September; "The advantage of the concept," says Bill, "is that we get to propose a set of standards for the Receiving Areas that's probably going to be a lot less restrictive than the standards that we developed on the A, B,C, and D areas "; Discussion continued around the draft schedule with Bruce Anderson commenting that "Acquisition" should be added to the list of issues for consideration; he also pointed out the need to include the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) adoption date to the calendar; Bob Mulhere notes; Chuck Mohlke suggests moving to discussion of future meeting dates; the committee agrees; FUTURE MEETING DATES (Item VI.) A tentative schedule through the end of the year is reached: September 26 October 10 and 24; Dr. Nicholas interim report, tentatively, October 3 November 7, 14, 28 December 5 and 12 (Item V.C.) Discussion of Big Corkscrew Island Community opposition petition: Ray Pelletier comments on the Naples Daily News article concerns and petition in regard to receiving area; Maureen Bonness, property owner and resident distributes a copy of Memo to Commissioner Coletta and Rural Fringe Committee with petition signature results to date; the memo states" the 16J1 owners and residents of Big Corkscrew Island Community are petitioning Collier County to keep the housing density of their community at no more than one dwelling per five acres "; David Ellis asks for staff comment; Bob Mulhere says, "there's a concern out there, but we don't even have a policy fleshed out, it's just a concept right now; it's a legitimate concern, but we have an obligation to those property owners out there to have a really specific plan so that they can react to it; it's hard to say whether someone thinks this is a good idea or a bad idea until they really know what the idea is "; David encourages Maureen Bonness to participate in the regular Rural Fringe Committee meetings as well as the meeting with Dr. Nicholas; Ms. Bonness comments, "I was hoping to get into the planning side, not the reaction side "; Bob responds, "the point is, through the Nicholas analysis, we may find that we have such a large area to accept transfer of development, that we don't really need to include Corkscrew, for example, and if the folks in Corkscrew don't want to be included and we don't need to include them, why would we do that ? "; David thanks Ms. Bonness for her comments; (Item V.B.) Mitigation discussion: Chuck Mohlke asks Bill Lorenz if the preliminary draft of the "Uniform Assessment Procedure" is still in the comment period; Bill replies, "yes; we will be utilizing this methodology once it gets adopted, so we're purposing as staff, to use it "; David comments that he sent a letter to Thomas Sansbury, EAC Chairman at the request of the Rural Fringe Committee; he summarizes, "we're waiting on the Nicholas study to talk about TDRs; once we get the study, we'll talk about TDRs; the EAC, the public at large, everybody's welcome to be a part of that discussion "; GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT (Item VII.) David calls for general public comment; Dawn Jantsch and the committee thank Commissioner Henning and Commissioner Coletta for their attendance; ADJOURNMENT (Item VIII.) David motions to adjourn, seconded by Patrick Miller; the committee unanimously agrees and the meeting concludes at 5:35 p.m. A taped and hard copy of these minutes in final form are available at the Clerk of Courts, Minutes and Records Office, Building F, Collier County Government Complex and can also be viewed at www.nasites.com /collier on the Rural Assessments page I. II III Flele / Ceder n K e Colette ._ IMMOKALEE BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE AUGUST 15, 2001 The meeting was called to order by Denise Smith at 3:45 PM at the Immokalee Community Park. ATTENDANCE: A. Members: Denise Smith; Rita Avalos; Cherryle Thomas; Dorcas Howard; Sharon Tims B. Collier County: Val Prince and Bob Petersen, Landscape Operations; Dora Vidaurri and Maria Benavides, Immokalee Code Enforcement C. Other: Mike McGee, McGee and Associates; Steve Fabiano, Commercial Land Management; Allen Jost, Manpower Inc, Secretarial Services. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was moved by Rita Avalos and seconded by Sharon Tims that the minutes be approved. Unanimous approval. IV. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. BUDGET: Val Prince presented the Fund 156 Budget figures as of this date. A copy of which is made a part of the minutes. He stated that a purchase order has been made for the 50 palms that will going to the south end of the project on 846 at a total cost of $30,000. He was asked why they had died and he speculated that it was probably the dirt that kept piling up from the roadway. He stated that the MSTU revenue is up. V. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT: Mike McGee entered his Memorandum to Commercial Land Maintenance, pertaining to his quarterly observation of the project area for the last three months, into the minutes. Cherryle Thomas asked about the light that was missing for several months and was returned for the second time to the vendor. Mike reminded her that he has continually asked the committee to order more than one light at a time so that there could be replacements on hand. The problem is that there is no place to store them and they get damaged lying around. He reiterated that he had suggested that the cement slab that they stored stuff on could be chain link fenced to keep things from disappearing or getting damaged. Bob Petersen stated that the light has already been shipped. Cherryle Thomas said that there will be a grand opening for the new building and there are certain merchants that want to display banners. Mike said that the committee must come to an agreement on the type and size of banner that can be used. He said that he would bring the welcome banner that was never developed back to the meeting next month. Corres: Mike went on to say that the Luna sisters put in a new sidewalk buR nas never been sodded and irrigated to the asphalt and the sand is washing; n��cc� street on the west side of second street. Dare: _,1 jn� 5. Item# I b S � Copies To: 16J1 RCMA has done some patchwork on the walls and someone emptied a bucket of cement into the ground around the palm tree. It might kill the tree but will be impossible to get it out without doing so. Steve Fabiano said he did a site inspection with Mike McGee, Bob Petersen and Val Prince, where they found many of the things that were listed in Mike's Memo plus that generally there is a lot of debris and trash throughout 846 and 29 in the median and along the roadways. He said that he took digital pictures and would have a representative of CML and the sweeping company to come to Immokalee tomorrow to be shown where more attention must be given. There are many areas that the sweeping machine cannot get in to and he is going to tell his people to pay more attention to blowing those inaccessible areas out. He pointed out many deficiencies and agreed that the workers need more field supervision and would ask Bob Kindelan to schedule that type of thing. Hopefully by next month most of the things on Mikes Memo can be started, if not finished. Mike stated there are several immediate hazardous conditions that must be taken care of such as broken planters, tree grates and numerous things, indicating slack practices going on. There must be more communication from the Maintenance Company to the County. They should also be reporting on a weekly basis what plantings are missing or what things are happening that have to be corrected. This is part of the maintenance contract. Mike would like to create some type of plantings that would discourage people from crossing the medians. The committee is spending a lot of money on replacements and asked Val Prince to bring back the figures of how much has been spent. VI. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS REPORT: Mike McGee presented the plan for landscaping the triangle at the north end of SR29 and New Market Road. He qualified his presentation with the fact that about 100 feet south from the intersection there is a 45 MPH zone on the southbound and a 55 MPH zone on the northbound. This puts the entire plan in a 55 MPH zone. In order to implement as is, the speed would have to be changed to 45 because the plantings would have to be spread further apart in the higher zone. Until there can be some change he cannot submit it to the state. He suggested that for safety purposes the committee seek to have a stop light put in at the intersection. Costs were then presented for the plan as laid out. Including the sign structure and electric it would cost between $55,000 and $60,000 for the plantings. A well would be about $8,000 to $10,000. Cherryle Thomas asked if a well could be put in. Mike suggested that the well could be deferred to a later date and then city water could be used temporarily. Cherryle Thomas made a motion to approve the well. Motion died for lack of a second. Mike presented three different scenarios for lighting. First, there is in grade lighting that will take six underground fixtures installed to the back of the sign. This would cost about $3600. Second would be to place eleven single street lights in the corners of the intersection and that would be $49,500. The third scenario would be to place the double lighted fixture with the banner arms that would be $53,500 or more. Denise Smith brought up that since all this money was being spent on beautifying the area, could there be a way of keeping all those trucks from parking there. He recommended that curbing and some additional trees be put in to keep the trucks from parking and entering the roadway at that point which would make it a safety problem because of line of sight. He said that parking is not legally allowed there and it is just a matter of enforcement to keep them from parking there. Rita Avalos moved to go ahead and start with the landscaping, to include the site work, irrigation and dropping in the sleeving. The lighting is to be delayed but the site should be prepared for it. Cherryle Thomas seconded it. Motion carried unanimously. VII. COMMITTEE MEMBERS REPORT: None VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. CODE ENFORCEMENT COMPLAINT FOLLOWUPS: Dora Vidaurri stated that her office is The Immokalee Initiative Housing Project. This office comes under Housing Urban Improvement which along with Code Enforcement comes under the County Community Services. She said her office does have a code enforcement person in it to facilitate their mission which is to remove substandard housing and thus far have removed 30% of those considered substandard and under scrutiny. She said they are authorized one full time inspector and two full time inspectors. They have been operating with one of the inspectors because one was out on medical leave and when he returned the other accepted another position. She said they do take all complaints and she has expressed the MSTU's concern to Michele Arnold, the Director of Code Enforcement. She said they do process the complaints however they do not enforce them unless they are of life threatening proportions. She brought some Immokalee Voluntary Code Patrol forms, a copy of which is made a part of the minutes, and passed them out and answered questions on how to fill them out and dispose of them. Their office will then process it and record it which will help in future compliance enforcement. A letter dated August 6, 2001 from Jim Coletta, Collier County Commissioner, District 5 to the committee was read and it was recommended by them that Dora Vidaurri pass the Commissioners concerns upward to her supervisors. A copy of the letter is made a part of the minutes. Dora said she wants to work hand in hand with this community and she would like to see the end result to be a miniature community development service because this community is in great need at this point but unfortunately with only one inspector, who has just returned from medical leave, and another not scheduled to come on for several weeks. She said being a member of this community she is also very concerned and can relate to the issues. She was asked if the county would be able to budget another body for Immokalee. She was uncertain but said it would be looked into. It seems like this Immokalee Center is 16J1 budgeted out of many different centers and being new she is still investigating why all of the changes in this office have occurred. It was stated that the committee was under the impression by E -Mails from the County Code Enforcement Office that there would be a representative attending each of the meetings to follow up on the violations, however to date that has not happened. B. CLOSING OF NEW MARKET FINGER: Mike McGee said that after looking at the heavy truck traffic that would be backed up if it was closed that a light at the corner would be the better solution. C. CURB PAINTING: Val Prince said he is trying to get a response from the contractor to pick up a set of plans for the painting. IX. NEW BUSINESS: Cherryle Thomas asked Mike McGee about expanding the boundaries of the taxing district. He said that nothing has been done on that. She then asked if he could bring information back to the committee on that. X. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None XI. ADJOURNMENT: It was moved by Sharon Tims and seconded by Rita Avalos to adjourn. Motion Carried. Meeting adjourned at 5:50 PM. Next meeting is scheduled for 3:30 PM, Wednesday September 19, 2001 by .O � o o N w od' � C O C O y v � C ^O+ V 00 H 16J1 m n N V C O n u ~ c w J J Z U. a ! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n 0 0 0 "7 0 o q O !:% O O C n a oci000000o0cJ000 o O C. v b o o 9 0 0 000 0I OI IOII 0 O u 0 O o 0 0 0 0 O CD O o 0000 N 0 0 (rill N 0 0 lC> N W o000000o0000v00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o o v r. 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a O Z 0 00 00 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 o o .= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 n N n e- V 'C m M `OV. 000 077 In C CD l0 W Q O N N M n T N m N N N CO N 000000000000 w 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O CO � 000 0 0 0 O O O O O 0000 O CO a j o O O O O O O O O O O O O co 0 0 G O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O �- CD a M 0 O .- N N X W V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0( 0 0 0 0 O Q1 0 0 0 C C C O O O O 0 0 0 0 O o W 0000000000(n 0000 000 N (700 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m N r m O 0 0 0 N I- O O N 000 Im M IT 0 w 0 2 F- O =) Z o Cn C CO O N CO N M h M C N UO Z w W 000000000000000 000000000000000 0 O 000 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0000 O 000 r-� N n O tf O O w N 000 O M V' O 10 w W O .- U) �4 CO U-) C) M It N M � M CID 1� ° O W w a. d X w 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 C 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 W N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 W 1/1 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N r e- O V O— C � 0 0 0 0 (Ti M V 0 t0 0 0 O 0 0 m O CO W) �2 00 U') O M Q7 N Cl) In M n i- C14 CO a M am r CN N M Z 0070000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 000 O O O o O O O 0000 o O WLU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O 002 o Z O m�� Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O C7 O O U F- Ur C (O N P- ."I C V O — O lr O O O Cn M ,t O 10 � n 100 M m O0 ° (O V)N CO U') O M M M O NMI M N 0 m O m N N 'Cr M a W N Zrn U w wa ❑ m w > W o w> w w w o a a w F W f a �0x � � L D I= a w a w Z W m (n a a ❑ W Q F- OLL w 0 Q Fa- W Cr ❑ z m J ¢¢ Q U ❑ W y Z(L F a } C7 w F- O ~ Z w W w Z Z ZQ z ¢ W IX �a 4 ¢ rz 5? W v1pi x~ t= m p QN U w w F- Iw- ❑ J cr Z F- LL LL uw. W n' U O j ui ❑ W F W D i7 } Z Z J W I' w (n (/J N - U m U li W w Z Ur z w p Z w W V) C m U= aw O Q z z O ? O tr w p F- LL I LL LL w R W LL W U 0 U �y Z W O c� g O W F- Q W W W _N Z Z Z W w W Z= F- F X J a' m W w a m !Y F- Z ❑ Z❑ .W.1 Q N a (7 a' H W F=- 2' D D W 0 W Q w? O w ? N J m o W O F- m m X CL W W W m X C' Lo W W 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 r aD O O O O n.V Op O O O O M O Oi aV { p PV 'I [7 N f0 f`0 0 o N N O 0 O O O N OY'1 0) U X M enF CO m rn 00 0 a rn m Ov J W y N N N N N N N o O O LO O o O O Z 0 g o q U W Oo U ONi 0_o 1 T O v�Wo°o W N a W W c Y W O o U. Q � N 16J1 Ift p o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w o O O O O O O O O O O O O O o cn O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N IM 00 M T T gZ aLL a O V M T� O (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M w O I- Iq w (f) O a) O O m(D 0 t}' O O p U O (D N N (D O M O O T O O r- O 00 z u7 V M I`- T (D M O u) (D ti Z (D N M M (h -r O O r- M O V r V N N N T W; (N m p O r- r` M (D O d 0(D 0(D 0 0 0 O (D w;T 'IT O O O O m 0 0 w O ti W w~ p Z r z D 0 O O a0 00 M O (D O O T O O N O T M CO T 00 00 (D O LO M T M S T (D M O LO I`- (D r (C N W O O I- T M V O T N (L Q O w 00 M T T p � U W r IM o M z O L) U W cn pW w Q' T" CD w p o 0 Z o W as X w LU c j CW9 0 Q m a LU ZC90 u o a 0° p � W w r V a o Im Op = O Q m w I_- J E W p a x w w i- w CC pO w V IL x w O T(nvaaaaaaaaaa O of m N0000000000 (D r- rl- rnOVOOOO O t- (n T-1 V c� cc� Ct C W) CD 0 T MNr- cMMr`T cr N T O I- T T O T(n IQ- aO0oo00000 O IT m N O 0(D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r-. T T 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <rD (l Iq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r- O U M N P_ M N r` � O a) O r N T O d T N T T O T(nvaa0aaaaaaa O llt M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I T T C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (.0 C) r- 0 0 0 0 0 0(D 0(D 0 0 r- L T 'q- 0 0 0(D (D 0 0r,- O (n T M N r- M N r` T (D a) O T N T O IT T N T T O o 0 0(D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0(D 0 0(D 0 0 0 0 0 Cl C) 000000(0000000 r` O Tu') Nta000aaaaaa O eI M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O r- T T 0 0 0 0 0 0(D 0 0 0 r-r- rn0000000000 (nTll;�0000o0oti0(n M N r- M N rl- T (D a) O T N O V T N T T W U W Z W U Q W LL LU > Q W U W W W U) C-6 J 4U) a z � Ana wQ `" � Q o� M: W � c) OQ Q�WIw- �Qrz co W cA Q U W I- C7�� �'SO� 2E_< z z U M �� a w w w U w woU o- 3rEC6 z_3 Q -j NO Z� coo m�� =w<zUO�F =W QU) z 0ujQo =Z .6 � LU D F OUn"w zai2:5wwriO = M ai O O O o T 00 O T 0 0 O a) O O O O T T N N T a) a) T M V T M M M M M Q) �- ct M M M (Y) O (D (D (D N N M M V' d' V Iq q ` r Ict qT (r) LO (D (D (D (D (D (D w w w (D (D w H ti O N 1 ti M N I� M N 0 0 0 m r O a N z w a O ri O o) O ;I N 0.1 � � O � 0 � v 0 O N 0 O O N d v N LL D O O O O O O N O O O O O N M 0 0 0 0 I- O O O O O V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M r O iN �- M CD > O M w N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO CZ) OOOCi00000 O o O O W IX r0 O O M I,-- G Lf) 00 'IT N N O N W W D Z Z W U) U�0 W � Q U) W J�CE WF- U�� c O O Q�W U E -w1-gW U ZQw LU F- U) J OJ LU Lu U U< J Z w OjXWF- O�owzcr U) W W > w Q0F -OLL LL >QOW�pQO2W w 1 3: o O F- -1 2 (n U' F- QZW r XLO W i W W } F- OpQW WOI — < W W w J W a p W W Of U Q W UZxZ 000LL..OZ? W W ce W 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 •- O O O O N 1'- " N O O d O p O Zr t -N V NN�- M q N M MO e- �- —d'r -- q MM 0 W V .- .- �MM(D(D(DWWMC) M M M M M m m M 'I �Y It M IL X W F- W N N N N M M M M M M 0 0 0 O N N N N N N N CO N O Z r- rl- r- r- Imo- O O O O N N N N N N N N O M 0) 0) ci W U (D (0 C0 C0 (0 C0 CO C0 � t N 00 r r r r r r r(Y) 0) 0) a) N O O 0 O CDI lP Cl) C) Q W D Z W > W w nclee 8c 4,adaawed. 16J1 Landscape Architecture MEMORANDUM: Date: August 15th, 2001 To: Mr. Val Prince, Engineer II, Contract Manager Collier County Transportation Landscape Operation Services From: Michael A. McGee, r.l.a., President, McGee & Associates, LC 098 ' M.S.T.U. Beautification Landscape nsultant Copy: Mr. Robert Kindelan, President Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc. Maintenance Contractor Signature Date: Subject: Immokalee M.S.T.U. Beautification District June 2001 Quarterly Maintenance Observation Report On -site observations were performed during 06/01, 07/01 and 08/01 of the project areas (C. R. 846 - Phase one, S.R. 29/West Main St. - Phase two, S.R. 29 /East Main St. - Phase three) with the following conditions being observed. Condition of the project areas being maintained are considered to be in accordance to the contract specifications unless otherwise noted below. These observations and comments are not intended to be all- inclusive and any items or service item not addressed does not constitute approval or acceptance of services. The contractor shall check off listed items as they are addressed or completed as soon as possible, then sign, date and return this report to the consultant prior to the next quarterly report at the end of March 2001. General Conditions: (See specific area list for detailed information.) Canopy Trees, Palms and Tree Grate Locations: 1. Multiple tree grates on CR 846 are not flush with the adjacent sidewalk by more than 1/4 inch above creating potential trip hazards. Any time a tree grate is found to be broken or unleveled and is causing a potential trip hazard for pedestrian it must be replaced as soon as possible. Until a replacement is installed a warning /protective barrier must be installed over the problem area. 2. Any trees within the tree grates along CR 846 that are leaning or are in a state of decline shall be removed prior to replacement with the Foxtail palms. If the trees are removed then the tree grate opening must be filled with gravel to the top edge of the tree grate. 3. Any tree with guying or bracing must have the wires or guys reviewed with each site service and kept taut at all times. If the supports are not working then they need to be removed. 4. Any tree grates with missing trees must have the tree hole filled or a warning cone installed until tree is replaced. 5. Many tree grate locations along SR 29 need to have the tree grates removed and the pits cleaned to determine if it is dirt or the palms that are lifting the tree grates. Design * Environmental Management * Planning 5079Taralami Trail East / P.O. Box 8052 Naples, Florida 34101 Phone (941) 417 -0707 * LC 098 * Fax (941) 417 -0708 16J1 Page two, 1. M. B. D. June Qtdy. Report 08/15/01 Palms: 1. The Cabbage palms and Foxtail palms appear to be in generally good health, except for three Foxtail palm locations that keep being damaged by vehicles or have been damaged by pedestrians. Shrubs: 1. The shrubs overall are in generally good health, except for the areas that are being damaged by pedestrian traffic. 2. All shrubs need to be reviewed with each site service to prune out dead or diseased wood. 3. The Thryallis shrubs along CR 846 need to be pruned down for visibility purposes. Ornamental Grasses I Ground Covers: 1 In general most of the ground covers and ornamental grasses are in good condition. The exceptions are along West Main St, that are being crushed by pedestrians. Turf: 1. The turf areas within the phases are being mowed and edged per the specifications, except for the west right -of -way area along CR 846 that is too wet to mow during some weekly services in the rainy season. 2. The St. Augustine turf areas must continue to be treated for weeds per the specifications. Mulch: 1. CR 846 has sand build up over the mulch, as well as some bare areas. It is recommended to turn the mulch at this time and then top dress thin areas. Watering I Irrigation Systems: 1. The Contractor needs to continue reviewing and cleaning all valve box locations. Valve boxes were observed with excess dirt and debris covering the boxes. Contractor is required perform contract irrigation specifications during the rainy season. Brick Paving: 1. Several medians have brick damage, (see specific areas listed for locations and amounts). Trash Pickup & Containers: 1. The Contractor generally is keeping up with the trash pickup per the specifications, except within the street level planters of the bulbouts. Banners: 1. None installed at this time. Bike Racks: 1. One automobile damaged rack has been removed and needs to be replaced (see specific areas listed for location). Bulbout Benches: 1. Benches are collecting dirt and need to be blown clean with each site visit. Addition hand cleaning appeaers to be needed to remove dirt and markings. Street Sweeping /Cleaning 1. The day time street sweeping is not collecting enough dirt in the curbing and turn lane areas due to the daytime parking of cars. It is recommended a three day a week hand operated street sweeper be added to the contract in order to keep up with the street sweeping. Lightinq: C.R. 846, Phase One 1. The median accent lights visually appear to be in good condition, except for damaged or missing poles in median # 1 and 2 (see specific areas listed for locations). 16J1 Page three, I.M.B.D. Jun. 01 Qtdy. Report 08/15/01 SR 29, Phase Two 1. Generally the streetlights and pedestrian accent lights appear to be in good condition. 2. There are three leaning median accent lights that need to be addressed. 3. The first streetlight west of N 5`" St. base cover damaged. Specific Areas: C.R. 846 Phase One - East RIW Areas: ❑ Two Holly trees missing adjacent to median #1. ❑ Adjacent to middle of median #2 one tree is missing. ❑ Adjacent to north end of median #2 Holly tree has been cut down and the stump needs to be removed. The tree grate is also broken and damaged. • Adjacent to the north end of median # 3 Holly tree is leaning into the sidewalk and needs to be removed. • Adjacent to middle and north end of Median # 4, three Holly trees in grates are missing. • From the middle to the south end of median # 5 there are two Holly trees in grates that are leaning and two missing. • North end of median #7 Holly tree is leaning due to growing out from under exotic tree growing on adjacent property. Exotic tree needs to be removed. C.R. 846 Phase One West R/W Areas ❑ Curb and gutter returns on side streets need to be reviewed and cleaned. ❑ North end of median #5 Holly tree missing and tree grate is broken and needs to be removed as soon as possible and a temporary wood plate needs to be installed until new grate can be installed. Adjacent to middle and south end of median #5 three Holly trees are missing. • The tree grate on the west r/w adjacent median # 7 or the first one south of SR 29 must be reset and made flush with the surrounding concrete sidewalk. • The tree grate along the west R/W at the north end of median #4 is broken and raised creating a trip hazard and must be replaced as soon as possible. A temporary wood plate needs to be installed until new grate can be installed. ❑ South end of median #4 one Holly tree is missing. • South end of median #3 one Holly tree is missing. • Sod area at the end of curbing along the edge of pavement adjacent to the north ends of median # 1 needs to be regraded and re- sodded to correct the drainage problem. ❑ On the west r/w within the turf areas in front of 411 1st St. the existing irrigation valve boxes have been run over and damaged and need to be repaired with the covers properly replaced on the boxes. It is further recommended to relocate the existing valves toward the sidewalk in order to move them out of the standing water area, ❑ Three Holly trees are missing along the r/w adjacent to median # 2. • A piece of curbing at the linear ramp on the northwest corner of the intersection of C.R. 846 & Colorado Ave. is broken and is a potential trip and bike hazard to pedestrians. • Four Holly trees in the St. Augustine turf area adjacent to median #2 are missing. Sign Area ❑ Sign brick support cap brick on west side needs to be re -set. Median #1 ❑ Brick damage, 4' on south and 4' north end. ❑ South light fixture 1A is missing. ❑ Remove volunteer lilies at back of curbing. ❑ Remove volunteer Purple Queen out of Juniper. ❑ Remove water sprout/suckers off Cape myrtles. ❑ Remove weeds. 16J1 Page four, 1. M. B. D. Jun. 01 Qtrly. Report 08/15/01 Median #2 ❑ South end Juniper damaged and need to be replaced. ❑ Brick damage, 3' on south end and 14' west side north end. ❑ Light pole 2A on south end is missing. ❑ Remove dead Holly tree. Median #3 ❑ Remove Confederated jasmine from within tree and shrub trunks. ❑ The brick area on the south end needs to have the back one third cut away and the concrete repoured and brick paving replaced. Approximately 45 sq. ft. The brick area on the north end needs to be replaced. Approximately 50 sq. ft. Median #4 ❑ Brick damage, 3' south end and 14' on west side north end. ❑ Replace Juniper pedestrian damage. ❑ Prune down Thryallis shrubs. Median #5 ❑ Brick damage 3' on the south end and 7' on the west side north end. ❑ Juniper need to be replaced due to pedestrian damage. Median #6 ❑ Brick damage, 1' south end. Median #7 ❑ Brick damage, 3' south end and 10 sq. ft. on north end. ❑ Light fixture 7B in median #7 has the internal bulb assembly broken. S.R. 29, Phase Two General 1. It is recommended the streetlight pole numbering be removed and replaced with 2" x 6" aluminum identification tags riveted to the pole base access door. The tags shall be blue with white letters. 2. Additional cleaning by hand washing of bulbout benches is needed, as well as the entire bulbout areas need to be cleaned of debris and dirt. Dirt and debris is built up at the base of the raised planters and under the benches. The all buldout areas need to be pressure cleaned. 3. Remove all Dune sunflowers and spray areas to remove new growth. 4. Blow dirt or debris from under plants along curbing if trapping dirt or debris. 5. Raised planters irrigation time needs to be cut back. 6. All pedestrian sidewalk ramps need to have the dirt removed and the ramps cleaned. 7. All brick areas need to be reviewed and sand added where needed to fill joints. 8. Valve cover box lids in paver areas need to have the covers repainted brown. Foxtail Palms: Missing or damaged palm locations ❑ 2nd palm west of west of N. Ord St. has harden plaster poured into tree grate. ❑ 5`h palm west of N. 7`h St. has been cut off and needs to be replaced. ❑ 3`d palm west of S. 7'h St. has been hit by cars and is leaning and the trunk is cracked. ❑ 2nd palm west of S. 7`h St. tree grate is covered with dirt and weeds. ❑ 2nd palm east of S. 7`h St. S.R. 29 North R/W Areas ❑ Sand brick paving, treat for weeds and review areas of sunken bricks for repair. ❑ Remove weeds from tree grates. Bulbout east of N. 2nd St. ❑ Two broken corners on raised planters. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" 16J1 Page five, I.M.B.D. Jun. 01 Qtrly. Report 08/15/01 Bulbout west of N. 2nd St. • Street light upper banner arm broken. • Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout east of N. 3rd St. ❑ One broken comers on raised planters. ❑ Juniper in east raised planter needs to be replanted. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout west of N. 3rd St. ❑ Two broken corners on raised planters. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout east of N. 4th St., • Clean up and treat Purple Queen for fungus. • One raised planter corner is broken Bulbout west of N. 4th St., • One raised planter corner is broken. • Cut Purple Queen away from valve boxes, clean up and treat for fungus. • Remove Purple Queen volunteer at bottom of trash container. Bulbout east of N. 5th St., ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout west of N. 5th St., • One raised planter corner broken. • Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout east of N. 6th St. ❑ One raised planter corner broke. • Clean up and treat Purple Queen for fungus. • Clean pruning and /or dead foliage off raised planters after pruning. ❑ Pedestrian walk ramp covered with dirt. ❑ Clean up and treat Purple Queen for fungus. Bulbout west of N. 61th St. ❑ Second Foxtail west brick area has settlement problem. ❑ One raised planter corner broken. Bulbout east of N. 7th St. ❑ East raised planter damaged and bike rack destroyed. ❑ Brick settlement at electric box on east side of bulbout. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout west of N. 7th St. ❑ Automobile damaged east raised brick planter. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout east of N. 9th St ❑ Two raised planter corners broken. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" ❑ Irrigation valve box covered with debris. S. R. 29 South RIW Areas ❑ More permanent and decorative bollards need to be installed around the backflow location. ❑ Sand set bricks around replaced Foxtail palm adjacent to median #2 settled. ❑ Remove weeds from tree grates and brick areas. ❑ Remove hose attached to bottom of backflow preventer filter. Bulbout east of S. 9th St. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 — 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" 16J1 Page six, I. M. B. D. Jun. 01 Qtdy. Report 08/15/01 Bulbout west of S. 7th St. • Two raise planter corner and one cap brick broken. • Street level planter to be replanted with 40 - 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout east of S. 7th St. ❑ Western raised planter 50% damaged from vehicular accident. ❑ Ramp covered with dirt. ❑ Channel drain is blocked corner holding water. ❑ Remove dirt that has been placed within street level planter at bulbout. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 - 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout west of S. 6th St. • One raise planter corner broken. • Prune back Lantana and Purple Queen. ❑ Clean up private property area adjacent to blubout and keep clean under contract. Bulbout east of S. 6th St. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 - 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout west of S. 4th St. ❑ One raise planter corner broken. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 - 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout east of S. 4th St. ❑ One raised planter corner broken. ❑ Prune back Lantana and Purple Queen and treat for fungus. Bulbout east of S. 3rd St. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40'- 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout east of S. 3rd St. ❑ One raised planter corner broken. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 - 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout west of S. 2nd St. ❑ Two raised planter corners are broken. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 - 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" Bulbout east of S. 2nd St. ❑ Street level planter to be replanted with 40 - 3 gal. dwarf Ixora "Red" General Comment for Medians: 1. The mortar support edge along the brick paving on the ends of the medians has given away and the bricks have settled. The damage in our opinion is not pedestrian or vehicular related, but due to settlement from improper installation of limestone subbase and/or mortar edging. The original installation Contractor Hannula Landscaping, Inc. needs to be informed and requested to make the repairs as warranty work. 2. Paint numbers on medians. Medians # 1 ❑ Remove Dune Sunflower and built up dirt to base of brick mortar. ❑ Areas of brick mortar supporting the brick edge has given away and the brick have ❑ settled away. Repairs need to be made by • Hannula Landscaping. • Remove old Cabbage palm bracing and banding. ❑ Replace missing Juniper on west end. Medians # 2 ❑ Prune dead wood out of Holly trees. ❑ Replace missing Bougainvillea. ❑ Remove Dune sunflower and built up dirt per note #1 above. Medians # 3 ❑ Remove Dune sunflower and built up dirt per note #1 above. 16J1 Page seven, I.M.B.D. Jun. 01 Qtriy. Report 08/15/01 Medians # 4 ❑ Remove Dune sunflower and built up dirt per note #1 above. ❑ Replant areas of missing Juniper. Medians # 5 ❑ Clean dirt out of pedestrian crosswalk in west end. Median # 6 ❑ Remove Dune sunflower and built up dirt per note #1 above. ❑ Replant areas of missing Juniper. Median # 7 ❑ Remove Dune sunflower and built up dirt per note #1 above. ❑ Add 3 gal. Juniper between existing plants. Median # 8 ❑ Add 3 gal. Juniper between existing plants. S.R. 29, Phase Three 1. There were no major problems observed and the area is being maintained per the specifications. ❑ Build up of dirt at ends of median separators. General Project Area Recommendations and Comments: 1. The dirt and debris is not being handled along the SR 29 Phase II area, The roadway parking areas, curb gutters, brick paver areas, pedestrian walk ramps, bulbouts and the tree grates have large amounts of dirt covering or within them. Previous Comments: 1. All areas in the median within Phase one where pedestrian have created pathways through the plant materials needs to be replanted and if necessary signs installed to alert the public that mid -block crossing through the medians is not permitted and is unsafe. 2. There are multiple locations along all the sidewalks within all phases that the sidewalk is not flush with adjacent pieces and are creating potential trip hazards for the pedestrians. These locations should be corrected as soon as possible and barricades installed warning of problems until fixed. 3. Within Phase two in order to help stop the dirt run off into the street and gutters from the intersecting or side streets need to have the dirt right -of -way areas re- graded to the proper elevation and grassed. It is further recommended that any businesses without proper driveway access ramps be required to install them in order to help with the dirt build up accumulating in the streets. 4. The medians in all phases need to have numbers painted on the curbing, as well as on the bulbouts for easy reference. It is our recommendation to number Phase One (CR 846) medians # 1 - 7 starting with number one at Carver Ave. and go north. Phase Two and Three (S. R. 29) start with number one at 9th Street and head east. The bulbouts start with number one at the east corner of S. 9th St. then run east along the south R/W and then turn at CR 846 along north R/W and head back to the east side of N. 9th St. with the last bulbout being # 24. cc: Mr. Bob Petersen, Collier County Transportation Department 16J1 3301 East Tamiami Trail • Naples, Florida 34112 -4977 Donna Fiala (941) 774 -8097 • Fax (941) 774 -3602 District 1 James D. Carter, Ph.D. District 2 August 6, 2001 Tom Henning District 3 Pamela S. Mac'Kie District 4 Jim Coletta District 5 Ms. Denise Smith, Chairwoman Immokalee Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee 607 Nassau St. Apt. #1 Immokalee, FL 34142 RE: June 20, 2001 Minutes of Immokalee Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee Dear Ms. Smith: In reviewing the minutes of the June 20, 2001 meeting, I see where reference was made to Code Enforcement and that a list exists as to the numerous problems that were presented due to the lack of enforcement of violations in Immokalee that were vigorously enforced in other parts of the county. I would like very much to see that list. When anything comes up having to do with Code Enforcement or the lack of it in Immokalee, please keep me in the loop and I'll see what I can do to move these things forward. Also, if you would copy me on any a -mails that went back and forth or go back and forth on this subject, I'd appreciate it very much. I'm here to serve you, you have only to call and ask for assistance when needed and I will intervene where necessary. Thant: you for the wonderful job that you and the committee are doing. SiWerely, Commissioner, District 5 JC: nkr 16J1 IMMOKALEE RESIDENTS IMMOKALEE VOLUNTARY CODE PATROL Case Number: Date: Assigned Area Number: Alleoed Violation Type: ❑ Unlicensed/Inoperable Vehicle, 91 -102, 2.6.7.1 ❑ Docks, 91 -102, 2.6.21 ❑ Recreational Vehicle /Equipment, 91 -102, 2.6.7.2 ❑ Building Permit (obtaining /post), 91 -102, 2.7.6 ❑ Commercial Vehicle /Equipment, 91 -102, 2.6.7.3 ❑ Addressing (posting /inaccurate), 99 -76 ❑ Road Side Sale /Shopping cart(s), 91 -102, 2.1.15 ❑ Right -of -Way (offending mat /permit) 93 -64 ❑ Illegal Land Use, 91 -102, 1.5.6 ❑ Minimum Housing, 89 -06 ❑ Litter, 99- 51(6,768) ❑ Building Construction Admin Code, 98 -76 ❑ Weeds, inches, 99 -51, 11 ❑ Rental Dwelling Unit Registration, 99 -58 • Exotics, 99 -51, 11 ❑ Swimming Pool Code (enclosures), 93 -66 • Fence, 91 -102, 2.6.11 ❑ Seawalls, 85- 02/85- 26/86 -5 • Signs, 91 -102, 2.5.6 ❑ Newsracks, 93 -12 ❑ Home Occupation, 91 -102- 2.6.20 ❑ Temporary Sales /TUP ❑ Occupational License, 81 -42 ❑ Other; Owner /Resident's Name if Known: Location: Legal /Physical Address: Address #: Narrative: *Please check any applicable box and describe your observations • Unimproved Property ❑ Improved Property ❑ Improved, Vacant ❑ Multi- family • Repeat Violator ❑ Bad Dog on Property At above time and place observed... DO NOT LIST YOUR NAME OR PHONE NUMBER ON THE COMPLIANT FORM - UNLESS THE COMPLIANT INVOLVES: EXOTICS, HOUSING OR NOISE. THEN THE FORM MUST BE SIGNED AND YOUR PHONE NUMBER LISTED. COMPLAINANT PHONE NUMBER x6i Carler =.kV COLLIER COUNTY HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD WILL MEET AT 9:30 AM, FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2001, AT THE COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION, CONFERENCE ROOM "E", LOCATED AT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES FLORIDA: NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE HAPB WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. 1. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA: 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 17, 2001 3. PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT: 4. OLD BUSINESS: A. HD -01 -1, Roberts Ranch Historic Update B. Little Palm Island Update 5. NEW BUSINESS: A. ADA Course for Historic Preservation Commissions (Part 2) 6. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 7. ADJOURN Misc. Comes: 16J1 COLLIER COUNTY Minutes from the Meeting of August 17, 2001 AT t FNDANCE:: Present: Alexander Dusek, Chairman Staff: Ray Bellows, Principal Planner John Thompson Bill Tyson Diane Gonzalez, Vice - Chairman Joanne Quinn William Dempsey Tomas Franchino Absent: Other: The meeting was officially called to order at 9:30 am. 4V)1)F fDA f: tnCyLNDA. A. McIntosh Professional Office Survey and Assessment Waiver Update B. Little Palm Island The Board voted 7 to 0 to approve the minutes from the July 20, 2001 meeting. e1! ,A 4NIN(� -,t,:RV1GES DEPARTMENT REPORI`: Ray Bellows welcomed back Thomas Franchino as a member of the Preservation Board. He replaces Charles Dugan who resigned a few months ago. '4'o LA - =1i;k A. HD -01 -1, Roberts Ranch: Ray Bellows gave an update on all the preservation efforts to date and noted that the County is still advertising for the position of Operations Manager for the ranch. He also met with Donna Ridewood, Ron Jamro and the project engineer to discuss the site plan for turning the ranch into a working museum. The Preservation Board has already approved a Certificate of Appropriateness that includes the Visitors Center, parking areas and plans for restoring the historic structures. The old church will be moved to a new location on site and turned into a conference room. B. Training for Collier County Inspections Staff: The proposal to set up a time and a date in order to hold a review for County Staff of this information has been delayed until the new Planning Services Director is hired. It was determined that this new Director should have a chance to review the scope of service along with determining the dates of the training. A. Survey and Assessment Waiver: The Preservation Board reviewed the waiver application for the McIntosh Professional Office Complex located on the northeast corner of Goodlette -Frank Road and 13th Street. The subject site is proposed to be rezoned from residential to commercial to allow 16J1 for an office building. The 4 -lot site currently contains three single homes. The Preservation Board determined that the site was outside the Probability Area as designated on the official map. Therefore, no survey and assessment or waiver is required to be submitted with the rezone application. Ray Bellows reviewed the survey and assessment and waiver procedures. A survey and assessment is only required when a land use petition for either one of the following procedures is submitted: A site plan, rezone, conditional use and /or subdivision for property located within an area designated as a "Probability Area" on the official map. If the property located outside a Probability Area, then no survey and assessment is required to be submitted with the land use petition. B. ADA Course for Historic Preservation: Ray Bellows passed out copies of part 2 for a self - guided training course developed for Historic Preservation Commissions. The members were encouraged to review the material and questions. Part 2 will be presented during the next meeting. 11 A[MENDA A. Survey and Assessment Waiver: The Board discussed the waiver request for a site on the east side of US -41 and south of Michigan Avenue. The site is surrounded by existing development and was previously cleared for development. No motion was made during the last meeting in order to allow for a site visit. The site visit confirmed that no archaeological sites were probable for this project. The. Preservation Board voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the waiver application. Little Palm Island: The Preservation Board discussed the proposed residential development for the vacant land located south of Imperial Golf Estates that is known as Little Palm Island. It was mentioned that the subject site may contain a portion of the old Tamiami Trail dirt road along with the abandoned rail road right -of -way. Since the site is located outside a Probability Area, no survey and assessment is required for the land use petition. A question was asked as to what is the historic significance of this abandoned road. Several members volunteered to take a site visit to determine if there is anything worth preserving. The Board considered having the property owner conduct a survey and assessment that would indicate the historic significance or the site. The other issue was what could be done with the site if it were designated historic. t.t � i �lt-FI INIG� Friday, September 21, 2001 at the Development Services Building in Conference Room "E ". Fiala L'` Page 1 of 2 Carter 6J 1 Henning / Mac' Kie V/ tuckersam Coietta From: wright —m Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:14 To: merritt j; tuckersam Subject: September 2001 Agenda AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTORS' LICENSING BOARD_ DATE: September 19, 2001 TIME: 9:00 A.M. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING COURTHOUSE COMPLEX ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THAT TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. I. ROLL CALL II. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS: III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DATE: July 18, 2001 V. NEW BUSINESS: Vasile G. Brisc — Req. to qualify a 2nd entity. Paul Cretella — Req. to qualify a 2nd entity. Fred J. Svenson — Req. to qualify a 2nd entity. Nikita J. Kravcik — Req. to waive exam for Painting license. Gervacio J. Andrade — Req. to waive exam for Floor Covering license Robert Rodriquez — Req. to waive exam for Floor Covering license. Michael Faulconer, Sr. — Req. to reinstate Masonry license without retaking exam. James L. DeMarco — Review of credit report. VI. OLD BUSINESS: MIS, Corres: Approve ordinance amendments. �_ Date: 2nd Entity Form — use of revised state form. Item# i LQ J i VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Copies To, 9/11/2001 Page 2 of 2 16J1 Charles M. Abbott — Contesting Citation #0989 issued on June 27, 2001. VIII. REPORTS: IX. DISCUSSION: X. NEXT MEETING DATE: October 17, 2001 9/11/2001 Fiala Ca Hen Mac Coletta (06Wex I2, ,x'001 1. Meeting called to order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of August 10, 2001 4. Landscape Maintenance Report 5. Landscape Architect's Report - Mike McGee A. Condition of project 6. Transportation Landscape Services Report - Val Prince, Robert Petersen A. Current budget B. Reappointment of George Pearson and Bob Cole C. Follow up on auto accidents of October 31s' and December 31St 7. Committee Members' Reports 8. Old Business 9. New Business 10. Public Comments 11. Adjournment Misc. Corres: Date, 4L Item# \)4p J \ D1Q aG : Ames 9, 200 / 0 -OOA m.. ��,� ®AQwnp: 16J1 LeCy Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee .Minutes - .Meeting of .. Ugust 10, 2001 SUMMARY OF MOTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 3. Minutes of July 1311 — Bill Erickson made a motion to accept the minutes as submitted; seconded by Bob Slebodnik and carried unanimously. 7. TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS REPORT A. Copies of the current budget status were provided and reviewed. Val Prince advised that Mike McGee's purchase order has been reduced; there is a $15,585 balance with two remaining invoices due. Val will request documentation from the budget office for the indirect costs for administration and engineering fees as well as electric bills. He noted that some of the encumbered figures were mistakenly put in as expended. 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. George Pearson advised that he and Bob Cole have received notices from the County that their terms will expire on October 1St. If no one else applies for the positions, then they will be able to renew. IeCy Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee - Minutes - - Meeting of August 10, 2001 1. Meeting called to order at 4:05 p.m. 2. Location — Transportation Operations Department Conference Room. 3. Attendance Taken: Present — George Pearson, Bob Slebodnik, Bill Erickson, Robert Weyers, members; Robert Peterson and Val Prince, Transportation Services; Robert Kindelan, Commercial Land Maintenance; Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Jacqueline Silano, recording secretary. Excused Absence: Robert Cole, member. 4. Minutes of July 1311 — Bill Erickson made a motion to accept the minutes as submitted; seconded by Bob Slebodnik and carried unanimously. 5. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A. Mr. Kindelan advised that the palm trees were trimmed last week and seedpods were cut from the Carpenteria. A Black Olive and a couple of Tabebuias were also trimmed. B. There are some dry areas. A few times recently, the effluent water system has been shut down from the plant. Normally the system runs four days a week. A leak at the plant caused them to shut it off two weeks ago. They will continue to monitor the system. 6. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT A. Mike McGee said that the project looks pretty good. He reminded the contractor to check the irrigation boxes. He noted that the aphids on the hibiscus would be retreated. 7. TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS REPORT A. Copies of the current budget status were provided and reviewed. Val Prince advised that Mike McGee's purchase order has been reduced; there is a $15,585 balance with two remaining invoices due. Val will request documentation from the budget office for the indirect costs for administration and engineering fees as well as electric bills. He noted that some of the encumbered figures were mistakenly put in as expended. 16J1 B. Val Prince brought the committee up to date regarding the drainage ditch and culvert pipe. The lines are open. The members requested that the area be put on the County's regular spraying schedule. 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. George Pearson advised that he and Bob Cole have received notices from the County that their terms will expire on October 11. If no one else applies for the positions, then they will be able to renew. B. George Pearson asked to have the palm fronds picked up from the top and behind the exit monument. He also noted that none of the four cul de sacs have been mulched with pine straw. Mr. Kindelan will follow up with his crew. George also noted that pine needles on median #4 were always being blown back after the sod was has been cut and that the manhole cover on Heather Grove was totally covered with pruning clippings. C. George asked Val Prince to follow up on two accidents that occurred on October 31St and December 31St As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 5:05 p.m. As there will be NO meeting in September, the next scheduled meeting will be held on October 12th @ 4:00 p.m. at the Transportation Operations conference room on South Horseshoe Drive. .August io, 2001 Lely GOT Estates Beautification .Advisory Committee Page 2 of 2 I. II. III. IV. V. Fiala Carter 1 Hennir Mac'Kie lot Colette :=t= Roadway and Drainage M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 August 17, 2001 The meeting was called to order at 10:10 AM by Bill Seabury. ATTENDANCE: A. Members: Bill Seabury; Bob Cunningham. Robert Jones and Tom Watts were excused. Andrew Reiss has resigned due to moving out of the community. B. Collier County: Bob Petersen C. Other: Roger Sommerville, Robert Gracey, Bill Hoef, Jim Lyon and Donald E. Haviland Sr, Residents of Quail Run Communities; Allen Jost, Manpower Secretarial Services APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of minutes of May 11, 2001 postponed to next meeting due to lack of a quorum. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Budget Report: Bob Petersen presented the Fund 155 Budget to date. The millage rate will remain the same. The revenue is estimated at $100,000 however it could change if the property values increase on the first of October. He stated that it is pretty much on budget with FLP but because of a survey, that was necessary to relocate the poles into the right of way, it cost $650 more than anticipated. B. Bob Petersen reported on the three projects that are in progress. The streetlights out front have been turned on. FPL still has not dropped the power lines because of some mix -up in scheduling. The paving and curbing is done. Maintenance on the back canal is being done regularly and that has done a lot to keep the water from flooding like it used to. He asked the committee for some direction on how they want the county to proceed on the paving of roads and the preparing of roadways for upgrade to the standards that would allow the county to take them over. The committee request that he review the process and report back at the next meeting of the approximate costs of such a project so that they could consider authorizing the necessary monies. M,isc. Comes: COMMITTEE MEMBERS REPORTS: None Cale: O 1--- VI. OLD BUSINESS: Discussed in Transportation Services Reportilemff I QJ t Codes To: 16J1 VII. NEW BUSINESS: A. Additional Road Resurface: Bob Petersen reported that the resurfacing is completed and was discussed in the Transportation Services Report. B. Mary Gracey, a resident had communicated her concern that the speed bumps had not been put in. The committee had been opposed to having speed bumps however they do realize that there is a necessity for some type of speed control. In view of this the committee requested a survey and review of the methods be studied. Bob Petersen said he would contact Gerald Morris, Traffic Calming Engineer, to come in at the September meeting and talk to the committee and after he talks to the committee that all of the members of the community be invited in to be able to give their opinions and discuss it. C. Mailing of Minutes: It was agreed that all of the Condominium Associations and Quail Run Country Club should be on the mailing list and receive the Agenda and Minutes each month. If the Condo Associations publicized the date and time of the meetings it might encourage attendance. The members are taxpayers and paying for the improvements brought about by this committee. D. Drain Blockage: There was concern expressed for the backup of water near the new paving on Forest Lakes Boulevard in the front caused by the blockage of the 6 drains from leaves, branches and lawn clippings. This was preventable if the lawn services would start to blow the cuttings up on the lawns rather than into the gutters and also if nearby residents and maintenance who see the blockage would just clear it away from the grates to allow the water to escape. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None IX. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 11:18 AM. Next Meeting is Scheduled for 10:00 AM, Friday, September 21, 2001 at Forest Lakes Clubhouse 16J1 FISCAL YEAR 2000 -2001 COST OBJECT EST REV REV RECD CENTER CODE REVENUE TITLE 00/01 00/01 112593 311100 CURRENT AD VALOREM TAXES 100,700.00 97,474.05 112593 361170 INTEREST-SBA 0.00 0.00 112593 311200 DELINQUENT AD VALOREM TAXES 0.00 3.92 112593 361320 INTEREST - TAX COLLECTOR 0.00 127.76 919010 489200 CARRY FOREWARD - GENERAL 90,300.00 919010 489900 NEGATIVE 5% OF ESTIMATED REVENUE 5,300.00 989080 300000 INTEREST - GENERAL SUMMARY 0.00 REVENUE SUMMARY 196,300.00 97,605.73 O CO 2 CO � O V A A O O co CO CO CD CO O O O O N O O O (O CO 0 0 0 0 0 o pp A W O O AO 0 00 0 (.71 0 A 0 A CO O A C. CO CO CA c0 A O CD A W O Cc C oO0 co OJO O CD O W W O 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 .y 0 N N 0 _ OV 00I O 0 0 0 0 0,, °00 O N O _ O O O �rnmm O o 0 0 o O zm a�w� mcnvncn 00 m CO 0 0OC wmmm 0 0 M—i 0 �mmm v 'D 0 o 0 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M <00m D O m �n m m ;d --1 x �� O r' < m 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Z N Z Z O W T-no ,nnc0C� Z D C m N m m ;a m m r, 0mz N 3 y `�`ny � G) cn c� 3 0 °o c � � z 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 DZz0 $ m m ° Z m S<0m �m� 3 0 0 0 0 C7 u X cnQ 000 0 0000000000 0-4 o m 0 0 0 0 >rn 16J1 :i== ------- 00 N N N N N N N N N N m 0 C"Cn crco000mtoocl o my O CO tp CO CD O (0 CO CD CO W W W W W W W W W W 11M m O W m m o m 0 0 m O A A A Cl) CW W W W w j 110 M CO j' A A A A A CO00000O COp ODD V m0O �m 000cDCnooco +o m0 -i OZmOp —Zm3m xc�y =�om3� 0. nnn°�ZO �Dm� ym� Zm= z m -nm. m M, 0) M w mN.n �Z N m m D m r� i cX m O p O V N C pp A O O 00 O A N V A CD A j N -+ -+ N O f.Ji O Cc C oO0 0 0 PP. 0 0 0 0 00 0,, °00 W Co O01OCo0 °0, °0000 O O o 0 0 o O O 00 0 0,00,0000, °m1n M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 o 0 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3v 0 °o 0 °o 0 0 0 0 °oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m ° Z m °OO o °0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 000 0 0000000000 0-4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O i3 z Cwt O V O O A N CNp N3 W C o O -+ V A A N N 0 O Cn W Co O 01 O Cn O O C L O O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 00 00 0 O O 000 0 0 0 0 0 iii ca °0 00000000 0 00 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 1 o° 0° C) O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0000000000 0 0 0 -am 00 0 0 0 0 O 0 m 0Z Z C V 'A 3 O O co tC W W O Q! W A Ai W O 0000 .oAD co O 00 O OOO OOOOOCW110000 m m o o0 o0 OO o 0 o 0 c 0 00 0 0 0 0 000 0 Cl ,t°Di1 cc 00000m 0000 -o p 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 w N ? a A k w w W N O W °o00m m O O 0 0 0 0 A A O N a aO�D w O W o 00 o Z A O O O O O O O O O O W CT O O O W pOD N COTD O O p 0 C C O O O O O O O O O O N 1 0 0 co O N N 0 O O V0 0 0 O i Z M CO 0 Cf W W CWi yt00 A A N O1 m 6D O W A m W O 0000 A A O Of W V Co C O O 00 (ASi O N O OM V 000000 Zz co O 00000 O O O O O N W O ? O Odo j CoO O O O O 0 OD OD O O to A 0 0 0 0 0 m T D W ro a 0W Cl -co (n co O Q � fD O _ N O RD O a7 D CD Z 2 N Co O O 3050 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 145 Naples FL 34104 phone: 9411403 -2398 fax: 941/403 -2331 Fiele CW*W Henning 1Nea'Kie CO1008 ""F ERPRISE ZONE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DRAFT MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 209 2001 EZDA MEETING The Enterprise Zone Development Agency meeting was held on Thursday, September 20, 2001, at the Immokalee Community Center, Immokalee, FL Officio and Ex- Officio members in attendance Fred Thomas, Jr., Chair Denise Blanton Floyd Crews Raymond Holland Jerry Hubbart John Kirchner Ira Malamut Herman Spooner Dora Vidaurri not in attendance: Lucy Ortiz, Vice Chair Robert Asbel Bill Dillon Al Neuman Tony Sanchez Guests attending Jill Greenfield, EDC staff attendiniz: Marlene Foord, Planning Helene Caseltine, HUI 1. Roll Call - Ms. Caseltine called the meeting to order at 3:20 p.m.; a quorum was present. Note: Ms. Caseltine served as Chair to open the meeting until a new chairman could be elected. 2. Membership Activity - Ms. Caseltine announced that Raymond Holland, Fred Thomas and Bill Dillon were all re- appointed by the Board of County Commissioners on September 11 th and are officially members of EZDA again. - Mr. Thomas made a motion to elect Raymond Holland as Chair; seconded by Mr. Kirchner, approved unanimously. Mr. Kirchner made a motion, seconded by Mr. Crews to elect Mr. Thomas as Vice Chair, approved unanimously. Misc. Corres: 3. Approval of Minutes from August 16, 2001 Motion made to approve, seconded by Mr. Hubbart, approved unanimctygq- � -- Item# 1(o J Copies To: EZDA Meeting Minutes of 9/20/01 Page two 16J1 4. Zone Activity • Ms. Caseltine stated that El Ranchito Ice Cream store has applied for a sales tax refund for the new equipment they've purchased. Mr. Thomas mentioned that the other ice cream store off New Market Road has recently opened as well in the 2 -story office building. • Wally Wash will not have the employees to qualify for the job tax credit, but will be submitting a request for sales tax refunds on building material and equipment purchases. • Ms. Caseltine spoke to Florida Specialties about the EZ program, at Mr. Hubbart's suggestion; the company may relocate to the State Farmers Market. • Ms. Caseltine mentioned that homeowners can qualify as well and will look into whether new construction can qualify. • Chairman Holland mentioned that Wendy's restaurant is trying to come into the area. • Dr. Blanton mentioned that Suncoast Credit Union is opening up a satellite office, possibly with an ATM as well. • Chairman Holland asked Ms. Caseltine to give an overview of the Fast Track permit process. She described the application process and explained that Naples has certain criteria for companies to qualify for the program, but that in Immokalee, it's available for any project and only dependent on job creation (not high wage or industry specific). • Effective October 1 st, the County will no longer do simultaneous plan and permit review, however, this will still be provided to EDC Fast Track projects. • Everyone was asked to make note of any new projects to make sure the new owners are aware of the Fast Track permitting and review program. 5. Committee Updates Mr. Thomas made a motion to re- evaluate the need for the committees, seconded by Mr. Kirchner. Mr. Thomas continued to explain that the committees were originally established to fill an existing gap because there was no executive director for the Chamber. However, now that the Chamber is fully staffed and tax credits are a routine function, and that perhaps the committees are no longer necessary and could be dissolved entirely. Chairman Holland said if no one objects, that the committees will be dissolved. With no objections voiced, the Chairman dissolved the committees by decree. • Strategic Plan Monitoring — no report, committee dissolved • Tax Credits — no report, committee dissolved • Marketing — no report, committee dissolved • Touring — no report, committee dissolved 6. Old Business Mr. Thomas provided background on the dormitory housing project, stating that dirt will be moved by January 1, 2002, and completed by August 1, 2002, and that the facility will be managed by Friendship House. Funding and support is coming from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, The Empowerment Alliance, and Collier County government. The total project funding is $5.4 million. He also mentioned that the dormitory will be up to Red Cross standards and will therefore be able to serve as a hurricane shelter during hurricane season. It will be the only such structure available as a hurricane shelter in southwest Florida. EZDA Meeting 16JI Minutes of 9/20/01 Page three 7. New Business Ira Malamut and Ms. Caseltine provided an overview of the grant received to provide computers and computer training to 95 RCMA families in Immokalee. Part of the grant is available for the Microloan program. Ms. Caseltine mentioned there hasn't been much participation in Immokalee, but that RCMA is helping to advertise the existing Microloan program through its involvement in the community. Chairman Holland mentioned that the important part of the program is the education aspect, which provides information on how to start and manage a business, through the Small Business Development Center at FGCU. Chairman Holland also mentioned that is sometimes a turnoff since most people just want to get started in business and do not necessarily want to bother with the education. The classes as SBDC are free. Ms. Caseltine mentioned that 15 -18 people have applied and there are 12 active loans, with 3 of them defaulting. Chairman Holland mentioned that this is one more program to advertise to the community so they are aware of it and can take advantage of it. Dr. Blanton mentioned that Julio Estremera (the SBDC counselor) is only able to spend a small portion of his time in the Zone and that more focus needs to be provided in this area. Jill Greenfield mentioned that EDC is doing an Enterprise Zone brochure and reminded everyone about the re- districting workshops; and about the 3�d Workforce Summit in Estero in November. Mr. Thomas encouraged everyone to go to the re- districting meetings because there is a move from a representative to change the districts to do away with the southwest district for the congressional seat. The meeting dates are listed in the Naples Daily News. 8. Adjourn With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 4:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Helene Caseltine, CED Economic Development Manager Fiala c�rtCart 1 ef .� Henning Colette MEMORANDUM To: Commissioner Carter, PhD., Commissioner Mac'Kie, Commissioner Fiala, Commissioner Henning, Commissioner Coletta, From: Winona Walker Stone, Productivity Committee Staff Liaison Date: September 20, 2001 Re: Productivity Committee Meeting Minutes The following items are enclosed for your information: 1. Productivity Committee September 19, 2001Agenda 2. August 15, 2001 Minutes. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions regarding the above information or enclosures. C: Tom 011iff, County Manager, Bob Byrne, Director, Internal Audit, Clerk of Courts Mike Smykowski, Budget Director Misr. Corres: Date: .L (A j Collier County Item# Office of Management and Budget 3301 Tamiami Frail, East Copies To: Naples, FL 12 Voice: (94 1) } $935 Fax: (941)' T -1 y� w 16J1 Collier County Government Productivity Committee Agenda September 19, 2001, 3:00 P.M. I. Introduction A. Opening Remarks B. Approval of August 15, 2001 Minutes II. Old Business A. Airport Authority Project Subcommittee Reports 1. Organization, Accountability and Communications Subcommittee 2. Business Plan and Development Subcommittee 3. Financial Management and Compliance Subcommittee III. New Business IV. Comments/Suggestions V. Adjourn The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, October 17, 2001, at 3:00 P.M. in the County Manager's Conference Room on the 2nd floor of the W. Harmon Turner Building (Bldg. F, Administration Bldg.) N 16J1 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE Minutes August 15, 2001 3:00 P.M. Members Present: James Gibson, William Adams, Thomas Casale, Edward Ferguson, Thomas Grootemaat, James Horner, and Janet Vasey Members Absent: Donald Campbell, Sharon Hanlon, Karl Otto, Jean Ross - Franklin and Commissioner Pam Mac'Kie Staff. Winona Stone Introduction: Jim Gibson, Chairman, opened the meeting at 3:00 P.M. Minutes: The minutes of the July 18, 2001 meeting were unanimously approved after a one -word revision was made. Jim Gibson noted for the record that the Pro- Freight/American Express Airport Authority billing issue had been satisfactorily resolved. Old Business: A. Airport Authority Project Subcommittee Reports: I. Organization, Accountability and Communications Subcommittee Ed Ferguson noted that he had meet with Commissioner Henning and among other things they discussed Immokalee development as it relates to activities at the Immokalee Airport. Ed and Sharon meet with Robin Doyle, Airport Authority member. Ed is still hoping to meet with Commissioner Carter and Jim Mitchell. Sharon Hanlon was planning on meeting with Commissioner Mac'Kie. Ed reviewed the subcommittee's findings, conclusions and recommendations. 2. Business Plan and Development Subcommittee Tom Casale noted that after initially reviewing the Airport Authority's Business Plan and meeting with John Drury, Jo -Anne Leamer and Gary Vincent he had viewed the Authority as a business, whereas in actuality it is currently a quasi - governmental entity. As such the Authority's economic impact on the County needs to be evaluated to determine its value to the community and what return the County is receiving for its investment in the Authority. 3. Financial Management and Compliance Subcommittee Janet Vasey reported there was no subcommittee activity since the submission of their final draft report last month to the full committee. ,r "',;, Page 1 oft 16J1 The Committee agreed on three follow -up activities: ➢ Ed will attempt to schedule a meeting with Commissioner Coletta. ➢ Tom Casale will provide draft text regarding actions needed by the Authority to enable them to measure progress and package a vision statement. ➢ Jim Gibson will schedule a follow -up meeting with the Director of Finance, Jim Mitchell. The following scenario was agreed upon: ➢ For the Productivity Committee's September meeting Jim Gibson will provide a draft report consolidating the three subcommittee reports. ➢ Once the full committee agrees upon a final draft report, a copy will be forwarded to the Airport Authority for comment prior to submission to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). ➢ The final report should be provided to the BCC in October or November, 2001. New Business: There was no new business discussed. Comments /Sueeestions: The meeting concluded at 5:15 P.M. Next Meetina: The next meeting of the Productivity Committee is scheduled for Wednesday, September 12, 2001, 3:00 P.M. in the County Manager's Conference Room, 2nd Floor of the W. Harmon Turner Building (Building F, Administration Building). Page 2 of 2 r; 1' Page 2 of 2 r; � J AGENDA Henning Mac�'Kfe Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization ---! Collier County Government Center Building "F', 3rd Floor Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room Naples, Florida September 28, 2001 10:00 a.m. This meeting of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is open to the public and citizen input is encouraged. Any person wishing to speak on any scheduled item may do so upon recognition of the Chairperson. Any person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing, with a description and summary of the item, to the MPO Manager or the MPO Chair 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled meeting of the MPO. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this committee will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. 1. Chair's Report 2. MPO Manager's Report 3. Committee Chairman's Report A. Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Report B. Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Report C. Pathway Advisory Committee (PAC) Report 4. Approval of .Tune 29, 2001 Meeting Minutes 5. Consent Section A. Annual Certification of Transportation Disadvan�tagcr g�l Coordinating Board Membership MM Date: Item# I Lod i Copies To: 16J1 6. Board Action A. Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Appointment B. Pathway Advisory Committee Appointment C. FY 2002/03 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Amendment D. FY 2001/02 to 2005/06 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) Amendment 7. Reports and Presentations (May Require Board Action) A. FDOT Report B. CAT Bus Shelters 8. Discussion Section May Require Board Action) A. Revised Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Bylaws B. Revised Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Bylaws C. Revised Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Bylaws D. Draft Tentative MPO Meeting Schedule 9. Other Business 10. Open to the Public 11. Next Meeting Date October 26, 2001,10:00 a.m. 12. Adiournment NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING F '// Carter Henning Mac'Kie Colette ._' The Collier County Public Utilities Division announces a public meeting of the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee to which all interested persons are invited. DATE: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 TIME: 5:30 P.M. PLACE: BOARD ROOM, THIRD FLOOR, HARMON TURNER BUILDING COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. Roll Call 3. Discussion of Procedural Matters 4. Project Overview 5. Review of TDC Funding Applications for FY02 6. Establish time and dates for regularly scheduled meetings 7. Public Input 8. Adjourn For additional information, please contact Harry Huber at 530 -5341. Harry Huber, Project Manager III Public Utilities Engineering Department Misc. Comes: o� item# I � J 1 Copies To: NOTICE,.OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AT THE BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM ON THE THIRD FLOOR OF THE HARMON TURNER BUILDING, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA :34112 ON JUNE 7, 2001 at i:30 P.M. R AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Presentation to Advisory Committee Members on the Review of Government -in- the - Sunshine Laws by David Weigel, County Attorney 3. Distribution of Ordinances that govern advisory committees. A. Length of Tenure /CCCAC Members B. Distribution of excerpts of the TDC minutes. 4. Budget Overview A. Work Plan FY02 - Adoption S. Old Business 6. New Business A. 10 -Year Plan 7. Audience Participation 8. Adjournment ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 16J1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AT THE BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM ON THE THIRD FLOOR OF THE HARMON TURNER BUILDING, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 ON JUNE 27, 2001 at 1:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. TDC Overview — Jane Eichhorn - Jacqueline Robinson, Esq. • Distribute State Law • Distribute Rural County Ordinance FY02 Work Plan — Roy Anderson 10 Year Plan — Roy Anderson 3. Old Business • May 29 minutes approval (available on web site — see attachment) • FY02 Work Plan — Roy Anderson • 10 Year Plan — Roy Anderson • Financial Disclosure Form 4. New Business • TDC Meeting of June 25 • New Project Manager Hire 5. Audience Participation 6. Adjournment ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 16J1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AT THE BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM ON THE THIRD FLOOR OF THE HARMON TURNER BUILDING, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 ON AUGUST 02, 2001 AT 1:30 P.M. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Additions to Agenda 3. Presentation by Humiston & Moore Engineers • Hideaway Beach T- Groins, 3 -Year Post Construction Monitoring Report. 4. Post -Storm Damage Assessment Report 5. Project Status Report 6. Old Business • Approval of Minutes for May 29, June 07 and June 27, 2001 • Discussion regarding telecast of meeting on Channel 54. • Discussion regarding Pets on the Beach. 7. New Business • Discussion regarding proposed field trips • Request for Proposals a. RFP #01 -3271, Professional Engineering Services for Coastal Zone Management Projects. b. RFP #01 -3272, Production of Beach Compatible Sand. 8. Audience Participation 9. Adjournment ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 16J1 / Fiale ✓ MayHening ---- � Mac'Kie Coietta TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE May 29, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 5:30 p.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRPERSON: NOT PRESENT: Gary Gallenberg Anthony P. Pires, Jr. David Roellig John P. Strapponi Ashley D. Lupo Robert B. Stakich William Kroeschell Robert Gray James L. Snediker ALSO PRESENT: James Mudd, Public Utilities Administrator Jon C. Staiger, Ph.D., City of Naples Natural Resources Manager Misc. Corres: Date: 6 Page 1 Item# Copies To: 16J1 May 29, 2001 MR. MUDD: Ladies and gentlemen, welcome. It's kind of interesting to see everybody up here -- up here on the dais. 1 hope 1 never have to sit in this chair for real life. It's a hot seat. I'm Jim Mudd. I'm the Public Utilities Administrator for Collier County. I'm -= I'm making an assumption now that everybody has received this packet in the mail (indicating). Has anybody not received the packet? MR. GRAY: I got it today. MR. MUDD: You got it today. You speed read, sir? I'm sorry it didn't make it sooner than that. Harry Huber, the guy that sent it out, is in the hospital in Gainesville. He normally runs the program management side of the house for beach and beach renourishment for -- for Collier County. Hopefully he'll be back on his feet. He had some intestinal problems. He had an operation about a year ago, and it kicked up over the Memorial Day Weekend and put him in the hospital. So we're hoping for a speedy recovery, and I'm so glad that Jon's here with me -- Dr. Jon Staiger is with me from the City of Naples, who's also the subject - matter expert. The two of them are almost like the dynamic duo. And so we will try and get through that process. But this is the Coastal Advisory Committee, and it has a brand -new charter. The charter was part of that packet. It, hopefully, will take a fresh look -- and not that anything in the past was bad -- but a fresh look in the fact that we start taking a look at the out years about how the beach and beach renourishment, beach access; those things need to be looked at, so that we have a game plan that looks out there five to ten years out. Part of your packet was also a ten -year budget. You'll say "Well, what happened there ?" Well, we tried to do the best we Page 2 16J1 May 29, 2001 could with the ten -year budget because there is also a move afoot to talk about how the dollars get disbursed in that 3 cents tax. And there is a special TDC meeting on the 4th of June that's going to take place where they are going to talk about changing that ordinance. So what we tried to do with that ten -year plan was make sure there was enough money in the coffer in order to take care of our beach and -- and the beach on Marco Island, the City of Naples and in Collier County in general to make sure that it is a world -class beach. Some of the things in that document for beach renourishment 1 had Harry Huber, the project manager, put in some place where this 50,000 cubic yards of upland sands that goes on the beach that it would be increased every year to a -- to a bigger quantity, so when we get to some of those issues where for five years we really haven't put a lot of sand on the beach since the rocks -on- the -beach incident and to try and catch up a little bit to -- to get those quantities and put it in the budget so that there was enough there in order to do it. We'll talk about that in just a little bit. 1 guess the first thing we should do is a roll call. Or, ma'am, did you already do a roll call? COURT REPORTER: I did a roll call. MR. MUDD: Okay. The roll call is done. And then we can discuss some procedural matters with the ordinance. But while we are here, just as an introduction in case everybody doesn't know each other, if we can start with you, sir, and introduce yourself to the rest of the members of the committee. MR. GRAY: My name is Bob Gray. I'm representing the City of Naples. MR. PIRES: My name is Tony Pires. I'm the representative of the unincorporated area of Collier County. MR. STRAPPONI: My name is Jack Strapponi. I'm with Page 3 16J1 May 29, 2001 Collier County. MR. STAKICH: Bob Stakich. Marco Island. MR. GALLENBERG: I'm Gary Gallenberg, one of the City of Naples seats. MR. ROELLIG: David Roellig, Collier County. MS. LUPO: Ashley Lupo, City of Marco. MR. KROESCHELL: Bill Kroeschell, City of Naples. MR. MUDD: And we have one -- one person that Is absent; is that correct? MR. GALLENBERG: There should be -- MR. MUDD: Mr. Snediker is the one -- MR. STAKICH: He's absent. He's out of town. MR. MUDD: Okay. MR. GALLENBERG: Is he a Marco rep? MR. STAKICH: He's a Marco rep. MR. MUDD: Okay. The next thing that we need -- we need to do and it's what you always do -- when 1 was joking with the councilmen, 1 said, "Sitting in the center seat doesn't necessarily mean you are going to be chair." But if you get in the middle of this dais, you never know what's going to happen. But we are going to have to elect a chair and vice chair of the committee; that's -- that's appropriate. And then 1 think we -- we probably want to take a look at the ordinance real fast to make sure that everybody is up to speed with it, to make sure that everybody knows what it says, knows what the charter is. And 1 would -- and I would postpone -- there's a -- there's a thing in the charter that talks about different tenures for different members based on a year, two years, three year. 1 would like to put that off until -- until the next meeting and let everybody make sure that they are familiar with that process, and then we can figure out who's going to be on for a year, who's going to be two, who's going to be four; that kind -- that kind of process. Because they want to Page 4 16J1 May 29, 2001 make sure that there's continuity in the -- in the committee as the years go on. So without further ado, do 1 have a nomination for chair? MR. PIRES: Tony Pires, for the record. 1 will nominate Gary Gallenberg as chair. MR. MUDD: Do t have a second? MR. KROESCHELL: I will second that motion. MR. MUDD: 1 guess, do you want -- you know, 1 don't want to put you in a spot. But from a voluntary standpoint, is that okay with you, sir? MR. GALLENBERG: I'll do it. Yes, 1 can do it. MR. MUDD: Okay. Now, let's take a vote. All in favor. (Unanimous response.) MR. MUDD: Opposed? (No response.) MR. MUDD: Unanimous. And one absent. I need a nomination for vice chair. MR. PIRES: 1 will pipe up again, if it's okay. Tony Pires, for the record. David Roellig. MR. MUDD: Do 1 have a second? MR. GALLENBERG: I'll second. MR. MUDD: Mr. Roellig. MR. ROELLIG: I -- 1 will accept that. MR. MUDD: Okay. Do 1 have any other nomination? Okay. A vote. All in favor. (Unanimous response.) MR. MUDD: Opposed. (No response.) MR. MUDD: And -- and one is not here. So by unanimous -- If 1 can get you to turn in your packet to -- to the charter. It's to the rear of the packet. MR. GALLENBERG: When you say "charter, " you are Page 5 16J1 May 29, 2001 referring to the ordinance? MR. MUDD: The ordinance, I'm sorry, 2001 -03. And then right behind it is 2001 -14, which is the amendment to the ordinance. No sooner than it was out, we had an amendment. The amendment has to do with -- with how the candidates come from the City of Naples and the City -- and the City of Marco Island. The -- we can go -- we can start on page 1, if you like. Chair, do you want to take this down? Or do you want to take us through this, or do you want me to keep working through this process? MR. GALLENBERG: 1'd -- 1'd like for you to keep going. As with Mr. Gray, 1 -- I have the packet. I just received it. MR. MUDD: Certainly. That's fine. This is basically the ordinance that established the Coastal Advisory Committee. There are three members from Marco Island, from the City of Naples, and from the unincorporated part of Collier County that are part of -- that are part of this committee. This -- this committee is to advise the Board of County Commissioners and the Tourist Development Council of project priorities with respect to funding sources that are available to Collier County for restoration and protection of its shoreline. The functions, powers, and duties of the committee shall be to advise and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners and TDC on matters pertaining to the following: And then it goes A through E; the development and implementation of long -term beach erosion control program within Collier County to include identification of peach -- of beach segments with common erosion and -- and acretion histories, recommendation of beach management strategies for each segment and the development of long -term strategies for areas of chronic erosion. And -- and this is just in my mind's eye is that identification, Page 6 fG�ffl May 299 2001 as you identify those projects and you become the sounding board for the residents of the county with -- with good ideas for programs, once you determine you want that in your -- in your plan or that it is an applicable project, we'll go out at that process and we'll contract out and get the -- an engineering firm to -- to develop a plan, take a look at the feasibility, take a look at the cost benefits, so that you'll have that information so that you -- it -- it won't be just one of these, "Well, here's the project, and here's what we think the estimate is." We'll basically come back to you with that -- that program and share that information, and then it's basically up to the committee at that juncture if it's a -- if it's an appropriate project or not. Planning and prioritization of capital improvement programs related to coastal issues including recommending alternative funding sources for the development and implementation of coastal management and erosion control projects. We'll look at grants from the State of Florida, the beach erosion control program, and federal navigation and coastal management project. And then C, coordinating with regional and statewide groups that may be necessary to further the goals and policies of Collier County. Outlining the coastal zone management policies and construction procedures for beach renourishment, sediment borrow -site identification, inlet management plans, inlet improvement projects, dredging -- dredge disposal and -- excuse me -- dredge spoiled disposal site identification, coastal erosion trend evaluation, coastal and estuarine habitat protection and restoration and other similar activities. And then, finally, reporting on innovative proposals by the public and staff. And then that's what 1 talked about Section 3, 1 asked that -- that we defer that part that -- that identification of who and how Page 7 16J1 May 29, 2001 long the tenures are going to be for the different members until the next meeting. Really, the -- the -- that's something that we can talk about. We've got some time in that process to figure out, if that's all right with you. Then I turn to Section 4 then. Let's turn to Section 5. 1 will talk about removals: We're just starting. 1 don't think we want to go there. It's not a good thing to do, but -- but officers and. Quorums, rules of procedures. We've elected a chair and the vice chair. Officers terms shall be for a period of one year with eligibility for reelection. The presence of five or more members shall constitute a quorum so that they can take action in necessary action. The committee shall by majority vote of the entire membership adopt rules and procedures for the transaction of business and shall keep a written record of meetings, resolutions, findings, and determinations -- that's why we have a court reporter here with us today. Copies of all committee minutes, resolutions, reports, and exhibits shall be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners. Section 6, this committee shall be reviewed once every four years in accordance with the procedures contained in the Ordinance 86 -41 as amended or its successor ordinance. In the event this ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phase or portion of the ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portions shall be deemed a separate distinct an independent provision, and such holdings shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. And it goes on and basically says the effective date. Page 8 16J1 May 29, 2001 1 think the real key is -- is on page 2 where it talks about A through E, which is basically the charter, the charter of the committee. Do 1 have any questions on the ordinance at all? Okay. The other -- the other issue we need to talk about is -- and we can talk about this at the end or at the beginning is when do we -- how often do we want to meet as a committee as we run through this process. And 1 know it's new for many folks that are sitting on the dais right now. Something that had come across would be on a monthly basis, and if you want to have it sooner because you want to get a couple of -- a couple of meetings so that we've got a good feel for where we're going in the projects and -- and part of the project review, we'll figure out if we have lots of questions and if we have to come back and review those particular issues, we might want to have a more frequent meeting than once a month. But 1 throw that at you, and as we finish this meeting, we'll come back to that issue to figure out when our next meeting will be -- when you would like that to happen and what times you'd like it to happen and things like that. MR. GALLENBERG: How often -- 1 know we have at least two members here that were on the Beach Renourishment Committee. How often did that meeting meet? MR. GRAY: Once a month -- MR. ROELLIG: Once a month we met -- COURT REPORTER: Okay. Wait. I'm going to need for everyone to identify themselves -- MR. ROELLIG: Sorry. COURT REPORTER: -- and speak one at a time. Okay. MR. GALLENBERG: 1 was, and still am. Gary Gallenberg, asking the question. MR. ROELLIG: David Roellig. We met once a month, the first Page 9 May 29, 2001 Thursday of the month virtually always at 9 a.m., and occasionally we had an afternoon meeting that first Thursday. MR. GALLENBERG: And while the committees aren't exactly the same -- there's substantial overlap -- did you find that that was -- that you have enough to do and not too much to do? MR. ROELLIG: i think it worked out very well. We got our packages a week or so ahead of time, and everyone seemed to be able to get up to speed and cover the agenda. MR. GRAY: Bob Gray. I would like to add that there toward the end we were meeting at one o'clock in the afternoon. I felt like that was more satisfactory. It seemed like when we met at nine o'clock in the morning we were running way past lunchtime. And it just wasn't too workable. MR. GALLENBERG: Is there a feeling including -- including staff advisors, whether -- whether we ought to try for a daytime schedule or whether something like this is more convenient to people? MR. KROESCHELL: I would prefer a daytime schedule myself. Bill Kroeschell. 1 would definitely prefer a daytime schedule. MR. STAKICH: If we meet around one -- because of things we have to do at Marco at -- from noon on -- usually meetings, 1 would say 1:30 would be a much -- fine time, as far as I'm concerned. MR. GALLENBERG: Any others? Tony, 1 know you have daytime -- MR. P1RES: Daytime Is fine, 1:30. Generally, 1 have -- four times a month, at least, on CDDs that I represent and otherwise. Daytime is fine, as far as -- and Tuesday is county commissioner meetings, so I guess we •- MR. GALLENBERG: 1 think daytime consensus then. Does Thursday work, generally speaking, for everyone? Page 10 16J1 May 29, 2001 MR. GRAY: Thursday would be great, as far as I'm concerned. MR. STAKICH: Same here. MR. GALLENBERG: So that we'll at least initially -- provided we -- 1 guess we'll need a motion and a vote proposing Thursdays. And then at 1 or 1:30, how do we feel about that? MR. GRAY: Either one is okay with me. MR. STAKICH: Ashley and 1 go to Rotary at twelve. We get out at one. It takes a half hour to get up here. MR. GALLENBERG: Okay. Well, then, if someone wants to make a motion that we'll initially schedule meetings for the first Thursday of each month, and that would commence June 7th. 1 think that probably works out well timewise. MR. GRAY: 1 so move. MR. ROELLIG: 1 will second that. MR. GALLENBERG: All in favor. (Unanimous response.) MR. GALLENBERG: Opposed. (No response.) MR. GALLENBERG: Passes unanimously. One member absent. MR. MUDD: Okay -- MR. GALLENBERG: Colonel Mudd, did -- is it your -- do you think we should go through these -- the various applications this evening, or were they intended more for review? MR. MUDD: I think we need to go through those projects because we went in front of the -- went in front of the TDC, and when we got to this -- to this portion, we laid out the program, and it was all subject to your approval, so 1 got their approval subject to your approval. 1 really only asked them for 4.5 million, but if you look at the minutes they gave us up to S. Maybe it was a slip, but 1 smiled and looked at everybody else and said, "Now, Page 11 16J1 May 299 2001 what are you -guys going to do, okay, during that meeting ?" But -- but really they want to know what your recommendation is for next year's packet. And I -- and 1 know this is -- this is a short period of time. But if you feel -- if you feel more comfortable with coming back to us on the 7th after you have read these, then we can postpone it until then. Or if -- if you would like to get at it this evening, I have got -- 1 have got our consultant here that can talk about that process. We can lay out those projects. You might not want to approve them tonight, but you might want to hear the description of the project and what it entails. So that on the seventh you can -- then you can vote on the program. MR. PIRES: Mr. Chairman, just a question for the Chairman, in going through the materials -- and I'm new to this process, so I'll apologize for -- if anyone else has been through the process is much more familiar. I noticed during the questionnaires and the form of the application referenced whether or not the project would further the missions statement. I think that would be helpful to have the missions statement and also possibly to have the TDC guidelines. I understand they have written guidelines for various categories of the tourist development tax. MR. GALLENBERG: Uh -huh. MR. PIRES: And possibly even the tourist development ordinance, even though as Mr. Mudd indicated, it's going to be revamped. I just think that would be helpful and the suggestion of Mr. Mudd that they have a description tonight and a vote at the next meeting, so if it's not time - sensitive projects -- MR. GALLENBERG: Well, I will agree with that and -- and ultimately the Board of County Commissioners has the final say, but if we're not hamstringing their timing process, I -- I would agree. If we could have - have a relatively brief overview of the different projects tonight, including, perhaps, some of the bigger- Page 12 16J1 May 29, 2001 picture items, as Tony just mentioned. And 1 was thinking, too, briefly the -- if you think it applies, the settlement that has occurred or at least is in the process regarding the beach renourishment -- and the money, 1 assume, comes back to TDC, or does it go for the general -- MR. MUDD: It gees on -- it goes back to TDC. MR. GALLENBERG: One could go on forever about that depending how technical one wants to get. But 1 would propose just briefly what impact that has for the funds available for beach renourishment related. MR. MUDD: What -- 1 would ask you to take a look at the back of your packet real quick, is go to a sheet that looks like this (indicating). Okay. We did -- we did this ten -year budget to -- to make sure as they were -- as people were talking about doing museums and other things that didn't have a whole lot to do with beach, 1 wanted to make sure that -- that Harry and crew had -- had done -- had done their homework to make sure that we wouldn't get shorted, okay, in our funds in order to do beach renourishment or Category A type -- type of projects. So 1 had him lay out this process, and what -- what this entails -- the assumption behind it, it's a 5 percent -- a 5 percent increase in revenues and 5 percent increase in -- in cost of project. Just to make it -- 5 percent was a good number at the time, and -- and some folks talked about revenues being a different percentage and projects being another. 1 said, "Time out. Let's not confuse this system. Let's just keep it one number of revenues and -- and project costs." So we basically laid out the expenses that we have had for -- for the different inlets, and there are six of them that are put down at the time or -- or on the left -hand side under "Expenses." And -- and some of those projects change in quantity based on the historical applications when we had to go -- go in and Page 13 iG�fil May 29, 2001 dredge that particular pass or that inlet in order to do it, or when we just had to maintain it or monitor it. So you will see things like Wiggins Pass in 2001 only being $70,000, but then in '02 Wiggins Pass has a huge increase of $472,000. And then you can see over the totals at the far end. Tried to concentrate on that to give you some kind of prospective. That $1.3 million will go back into -- will go back into the revenues of -- of the particular fund, to the best of my knowledge. Now, one of the things I'm going to check for sure is I'm going to check with Mr. Weigel, the county attorney, to make sure that haven't misspoken. But -- but from what 1 understand, those dollars will come back into the tourist development tax. And that would be a source of revenue and -- and on reserve that would be there for future applications. What 1 would say to you is you're not hamstrung by this list. Okay. That's another thing that I want to make sure that you know as you sit there. You say, "Why do we need" -- if I took a look at this list and 1 was sitting in your chair, 1'd say, "Okay, why do we need to have a committee? You've got everything laid out." Don't be hamstrung by this list. There are some things that have been habitual that we've had to take a look at, but there is enough flux in this -- in this -- there is enough wiggle room in this project or sheet to just put anything that you need to put in there in order to get into the process. And 1 think Jon Staiger, Dr. Jon Staiger, will back me up on that. I don't think we've been hamstrung in the past. I just asked him -- asked Harry to put together a sheet to make sure that we weren't going to get shorted as they were talking about changing the tourist development tax and the application in dollars. MR. GALLENBERG: So this Is a beginning point from county Page 14 ITIM May 29, 2001 staff? MR. MUDD: Absolutely. MR. GALLENBERG: Didn't have input from the former committee or anything like that? MR. MUDD: No. it's just a -- It is a strawman for you to mark out as you're laying -out the grandiose plan for the county for beach renourishment. This -- this could become your working document, and we -- we can make changes as we go along into this -- into this process. MR. GALLENBERG: What happens in years -- you know, understanding that naturally it's the county commission that actually sets the budget, but what happens in years where the projected revenues are different than the projected expenses, if, indeed, that happens? 1 guess it doesn't happen. MR. MUDD: It -- it doesn't happen. If -- if you take a look at -- if -- if you take a look -- let's take a look at that shaded area at the bottom. And this bottom part is the shaded area (indicating), and that is pretty much the way the new tourist development tax ordinance is going to look. And take -- take a look at the carry forward, and 1 think the only year, at least that I could see, in this projection is 2007 we get a little close -- MR. GALLENBERG: Uh -huh. MR. MUDD: -- by a half million dollars. One of the things that 1 -- that 1 -- that's kind of disturbed me a little bit is they always talk about the catastrophe money in case we have the really bad hurricane. In order to get that -- one of the things -- reserves for catastrophe on F -- 1 had Harry put in $500,000 a year into that fund so that -- that -- that money could -- could start to build up. Right now 1 think it's about 150,000, in that ballpark. There is not a whole lot there. if we had a -- a significant event, we would have to go out and find 1.5 someplace from reserves, and then leverage that in order to come up with that hypothetical $10 Page 15 16J1 May 29, 2001 million that people throw around as far as the figure is concerned. MR. GRAY: In effect that "carry forward" gives you a reserve? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. That carry forward is that reserve that's moving; that's just a good way to keep your eye on it. If you keep a look under the carry forward above it in a different scheme as far as the allocation of funds are concerned, you can see that there are some hefty chunks of money that are being carried forward in the tourist development tax. And that was one of the reasons that they -- they wanted -- they, the Board of County Commissioners and the county manager, wanted to take a look at the funds to see how we could allocate it better to some projects that would bring tourist into -- into the -- into Collier County. DR. STAIGER: Jim? MR. MUDD: Sir. DR. STAIGER: Jon Staiger. One of the things that some of you may be aware of and some may not, the State of Florida has a beach management fund that is supposed to have about $30 million a year in it. We have applied annually for support from that fund for the last probably 12 or 14 years. It's only been the last few years that they actually had a dedicated fund with this fixed amount of money in it. But occasionally the state will spring loose with some funds for various projects, and Harry has been very active in applying for that funding support. Part of the process is a -- is a ten -year rolling forward budget that the State wants to see from all of the eligible counties on an annual basis. So -- so they want something with a fair amount of detail for about three or four years, and then in the out years they just want a rather lump -sum type of thing. But it's important for the continued effort to get state. Page 16 iC�ffl May 29, 2001 Funding support that this kind of a spreadsheet is -- is updated and -- and kept as accurate as possible. Because the -- the state has a workshop every spring or early summer when they are putting the Department of Environment Protection beaches and coastal systems people are putting their budget together to go to the legislature the following year, and so Harry has been pretty careful in trying to keep this sort of thing as -- as updated as he can. There are some expenses on here that 1 -- that 1 just may talk about a little bit. If you look at, for example, under A, "Inlets Clam Pass," you see the -- you have got fifty -some thousand every couple of years on alternating and then two- hundred -and- some thousand; that's the inlet management plan they're trying to keep maintaining there, causes -- calls for that inlet to be dredged every couple of years, and in the intervening period you've got money in there for monitoring and -- and either -- you know, either monitoring and/or modest dredging events. Doctor's Pass -- similarly, we dredge Doctor's Pass on about a four -year cycle, so that's what the four hundred to five hundred thousand dollar cost estimates are, is the actual dredging. And in between it's the cost of the -- the monitoring that is necessary. Gordon Pass, we're still trying to convince the Corps of Engineers to dredge it, and they might. And if they do, then some of that expense will not have to be undertaken. But the -- as we - - as we progress through discussing these things, presumably when Harry gets back, some of the details of some of these projects can be elaborated. But -- MR. GALLENBERG: Also in your judgment in fundamental -- let's just take Wiggins and Clam, if we might, that -- because of water flows or whatever causes the need to dredge -- that Wiggins -- you know, to keep on equal footing, more or less -- Wiggins does need every two years and Clam Pass, for example, Page 17 16J1 May 29, 2001 simply needs every four, is that -- are those generated sort of from a technical basis -- DR. STAIGER: No. MR. GALLENBERG: -- or from a political basis? DR. STAIGER: No. They have -- they actually have inlet management plans that were worked out. And for Wiggins, for example, was having -- used to have to dredge it almost on an annual basis, and they finally got a permit in the last year or two to remove rock that was in the throe of the inlet that keep the -- the dredging contractors from being able to get a deep enough cut, so they have -- they have got that Impediment out of the way, so now it should be every two years. And Clam Pass is a very small one that silts shuts very readily so that it has to be dredged more often. It doesn't have any kind of navigation problems with it. It's basically just so that the estuary In there behind the Pelican Bay /Clam Bay preserve area gets reasonable water circulation through it, and they -- this big mangrove die -off that they had up there doesn't get bigger. But all of those inlets; Wiggins, Doctor's, Gordon, Capri, Big Marco, and Caxambas all have formal inlet management plans which have been prepared by consultants and call for certain steps to be done including periodic dredging. At -- at Caxambas they -- they talked about putting in some offshore breakwaters, and that's -- I think there is going to be some more of that done in the next year. Bret or Carl may -- MR. GRAY: Dr. Jon, 1 would like to ask you a question. You have been involved in these things for many years. Back in March 1 cut an article out of the paper that alluded to the fact that if a community would come up with 35 percent of the monies required to maintain their beaches, the Corp of Engineers would pay the other 65 percent. Does that ring a bell with you at all? Page 18 16J1 May 29, 2001 DR. STAIGER: Yeah. Yeah. We -- we have -- we had, in fact, in the City of Naples a -- an authorized Corps of Engineers Beach Restoration Project, and it was deauthorized because it was never undertaken. It was authorized back in the early 70s. We had the opportunity when this beach management plan was being worked on for the restoration of the Vanderbilt and Park Shore and Naples beaches to ask the Corps of Engineers to participate and, in fact, with Porter Goss's help we had a -- a reconnaissance study done by the Corps, which they paid for. And they concluded that we did need a beach restoration project and that -- that it was something that was doable. The next step in the thing was a feasibility study which cost about a million dollars and has to be cost shared between the Corp and the sponsor, which would have been the Board of County Commissioners. And their time schedule was such that -- this was, 1 think, about 19 -- 1992 maybe, and it would have been '98 or '99 before they got the project underway. And the -- the beaches in Naples and in Vanderbilt were in such desperate shape that the decision was made by the beach committee and recommended to the Board, and they then endorsed it, to not pursue the Corps project because it would just take too long. And rather than spend $500,000 on a reconnaissance they would rather spend the money on -- on furthering the permitting effort that was underway at the time. About the same time that that all went on, Clinton got elected president, and he pulled the plug on all the Corps of Engineers beach projects for a period of some years. So that the -- the -- their whole effort at being major beach restorations was sort of stymied. The Corps was anxious to continue doing some of them, and they have kept up with -- with the maintenance of the ones that they built some years ago, but they haven't undertaken very Page 19 16J1 May 29, 2001 many new projects. They're now talking about instead of being a -- a 65 percent, 35 percent split making it 50/50. And there is some maneuvering between the Corps and Congress over that sort of thing. But we could always go back to the Corps and try to get them interested in helping us maintain the beach. 1 don't think that's an impossibility. The difficulty we had in the past was that there -- their program stretches this whole decision - making process out over so many years that we just didn't want to wait. And we were lucky because basically all the projects that were in the hopper got put on hold while the Clinton administration was in power. MR. GRAY: So it would be possible that we could in effect, run into a stumbling block because of having to wait for bureaucracy to work? DR. STAIGER: Yeah. Well, the thing is, though, the -- the state monies -- and much of what the legislature is concerned about in -- in having the state funds granted to -- to a thing like. Collier County is they want to see it matched with some federal money. So if we could get some federal participation -- participation, that gives us a step up in getting some state support as well, which then reduces the local government's piece of it; so that's something that I think there's -- should be pursued. MR. MUDD: Jon, if I can interject real quick -- I'm Jim Mudd, for the record -- 1 have a little bit of experience with the Corps of Engineers. The recon studies done in six months, it's 100 percent federally funded. If you say you want a project, they will take that process on -- normally takes them a year to get It on their program. Now, I want you to take a look at - under FY -2006 on -- on your sheet. I want you to go down to B -2 on the left -hand side Page 20 16J1 May 29, 2001 where it says "Construction." Collier County, City of Naples, six million -- 6.1 million dollars; that's the next big dredge -- hydraulic dredge event to put -- put sand on a large portions of -- of -- large portions of the beach that we have. If you wanted to start now, we could call it ticklers or whatever you want -- you could send -- 1 can call Greg May, who is a good friend up in Jacksonville, and say, "Greg, they want -- they want to start looking at a recon for a project in 2006." He could get that on his schedule. Do the recon -- recon looks for two things -- two results from a reconnaissance study; do you have a cost -share partner, and does it have -- does the benefits exceed the cost, okay, for the project; that's what they're -- they're basically looking for. Is there a federal interest in the project? And if the benefits exceed the cost, then there is. Then you go into a feasibility study. It's a 50/50 cost share with the partner. Now, you can -- you can get that 50/50 with in -kind service if you want. In other words, if you have a firm or you have in -house engineers that you want to put on that, you can get some credit in order to do that process as they do their study. But, again, it's 50 percent federal and 50 percent cost -share partner. The reason they want to know if they've got a cost share partner is when you go to the feasibility study you have to figure out whose going to pay half the bill -- pretty smart group of folks; either that or they have been stiffed before, okay. So at the end of the feasibility study, you get preliminary engineering and design. It's not full up, but you have an inkling about what the project is going to cost, where it's going to go, what the -- start with the permit requirements in that process and Ron -- or Jon is right; it can be upwards of a million dollars in that feasibility. Then when you get to execution it's 65/35 right now. There's been talk on the hill that it go 50/50. President Bush has Page 21 16J1 May 29, 2001 said "We want it to flip. We want it to be 35 federal, 65 local." What -- what 1 would say if it goes that way -- if you start getting 50150 or you get the inverted cost share where it's 35 federal and 65 -- the feds don't like beach renourishment, okay, for some strange reason. It keeps getting Into tourism, okay, and they have real problems with that. They don't have the picture of the -- the poor family sitting there flooded out, okay, with all of their belongings washed away. You just don't get that kind of mental image, so it's tough for them to leverage the — the federal dollars in order to do that. But if you get the cost share switched, timing is right for Collier County to get on that bandwagon. At this juncture we're going to get nothing In the past. if we can get 35 percent of six million dollars, that's -- that's not a bad exchange for us. And what you'll get are you'll get other communities along the coast that will balk at the new cost share, and that -- they'll bump themselves off the list, so then those monies get freed up. So 1 would say to you is -- as that conversation transpires on the Hill, our opportunities get more abundant -- and if they do switch it. But to do the recon, we can ask the question, and if you get to the recon part and they start giving you some information and you don't like the way it's going, you can bow out because that's 100 percent federally funded. So that's no -- that's no -- it doesn't really cost us anything to have -- MR. GALLENBERG: In very basic terms in your numbers, the county would -- would be betting in round figures half a million dollars in cash or in kind in order to get shared funding of two to three -- MR. MUDD: Only if you want -- MR. GALLENBERG: -- of the project. MR. MUDD: -- to go to feasibility with them. If you go to recon and they -- they say there is no federal interest -- Page 22 16J1 May 29, 2001 MR. GALLENBERG: Then it dies there. MR. MUDD: --it dies. MR. GALLENBERG: If you go to the next step, you still don't have the funding, but you have got to put out in effect, using these numbers, half a million to get your shot at two or three million? MR. MUDD: That's right. MR. ROELLIG: Well, I might add also, from my perspective as a retired Corps of Engineers, the other thing that is a possibility and has happened a number of times — 1 think we call it a section number in the law -- obviously, the reimbursement by the federal government as authorized by Congress -- some years they don't authorize as much money, but there is a possibility of getting reimbursed. If you spend your money for the construction up- front, in accordance with the plan, then you can apply for reimbursement at a later date. So if for some reason you don't make 2006 if we spent the money in 2006, possibly get reimbursed in 2007 or whenever Congress appropriates the sufficient money to cover these type of projects. MR. MUDD: Make -- make sure you have got an authorized project that has been authorized by the Water Resource -- they call it, Word of the Water Resources Development Act -- they normally come on even years, and that your project has been authorized in that process, and if it has been and it's through the feasibility, then your chances are a whole lot better to be reimbursed -- MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. MUDD: -- for your share if, for instance, the appropriation dries up that year. The other -- the other program the Corps has in beach renourishment and maintenance and things like that it's -- it's one of the chiefs continuing authorities. And now you're asking Page 23 16J1 May 29, 2001 me for a number which 1 didn't have. 1 said that 1 would bring my briefcase because 1 -- MR. ROELLIO: Because it -- MR. MUDD: -- keep their little cheat sheet in there. But -- but the continuing authorities process is a whole lot slicker, and Kos a lot quicker than the long -term fees -- or the recon feasibility and then the project. This one you basically cut your. Time periods down to two years from the time they look at it until the time that it actually gets constructed. And it -- it's a 65/35 cost share. They do a -- a quick- and -dirty recon -- they call it something else. It's a DRP, which is the final design report, for -- for plan or whatever it is, and then they get into the construction, and -- and they can leverage a million bucks. Their federal share on -- on continuing authorities for a beach renourishment project under that is -- is a thousand federal -- and if they're bringing in 65; so you're having a project that is about 1.4 to 1.6 million dollars in total to be constructed, and you can get at those kind of dollars too. And, basically, that is, you get yourself on a list, and they go down the list and you're next. But there are some opportunities there and -- in 2003 to leverage some of that, if we need to -- or any project. It could be a habitual maintenance project that you want to get them to -- to look at. It's a way to leverage your dollars to spread them out to get more projects that you want. And I don't think it really hurts us to try, and I'll -- I'll see what 1 can do. MR. KROESCHELL: Well, I'm In agreement with that. The other point that 1 can make that they made decide to break up the coastline of Collier County -- the segments where some will be congressionally authorized, the big projects, and the small independent projects, maybe there would be something on Marco Island that wouldn't impact the general Collier County coastline that could go under the so- called small project authority so that Page 24 16J1 May 29, 2001 we can work that out with the Jacksonville district. MR. MUDD: Sure. MR. GRAY: Mr. Chairman, 1 -- I just brought that up because it did come to my attention. 1 really don't think at this meeting we probably should go in to depth on it. 1 think -- 1 just wanted to get it on the table. It is something for this committee to look at because there is a -- you know, a tremendous amount of money here that we could tap into. MR. GALLENBERG: 1 think that's right. And this kind of gets back a little bit to Mr. Pires' point, at the next meeting, perhaps, we can have -- while the function of this meeting is -- is technical in nature, as we get started, maybe staff can give us a presentation, as you said earlier, about, you know, what are TD funds exactly, what can they be used for, and some other funding sources, such as what we've just been discussing. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. Without further ado, let's see if we can't get into some of these project descriptions for you. As we - - so that you will have something to ponder here over the next week or so. The first thing on the -- in your packet is for $213,000, and that basically pays the salaries of a Project Manager III, which Harry Huber is sitting in right now; a Project Manager 1, which we are out advertising in Collier County; a Construction Inspector that goes out and looks at the projects to make sure that we're getting what we paid for and -- and 1 can't tell you the history of the construction inspector -- and maybe Dr. Staiger can help us a little bit on this one. 1 don't know if this was as a result of the rocks on the beach or -- DR. STAIGER: Yeah. The -- I think that was the genesis of it. The construction inspector right now is AI Madson, and he's sitting back there in the back of the room. But the gentleman goes out on a very frequent basis and runs the length of the Page 25 16J1 May 29, 2001 beach in a vehicle looking for problem areas, whether they are rock outcrops or escarpments or whatever needs to be dealt with so that the county's beach cleaning equipment can address these problems and then, of course, during something like the more recent episode where we trucked thirty- thousand yards of sand onto. The Park Shore Beach and about, 1 think, fifteen or twenty thousand down to Hideaway. His -- his role Includes bouncing back and forth between those two projects and making sure they're being done properly. And 1 think -- I don't think we had that position until this rock issue became to the forum. I'm not sure how long. 1 think it has been the last couple of years. MR. MUDD: 1 would -- 1 would say from a construction aspect it's well worth the cost of that individual to make sure that you're getting what the heck that you paid for. We have -- we've got some experience -- bad experience. And it is one of those -- it's one of those issues, "You can pay me now or you can have -- pay me later. But when you pay me later, you are going to pay me a whole heck of a lot more than you would if you took that ounce of prevention." There is the construction inspector and there is overtime in there and overhead. I've got a figure on the -- on the sheet that says it's $213,300. When I talked to Harry before, he's got some - - he took a look at the salary aspect, and it's up to 280,200. But I'm going to wait until Harry gets back so he can define what those increases are, okay. 1 just noticed there was a difference as 1 was going through the numbers. So he's got to tell you what the $66, 900 are in the difference in that process. But this is Exhibit A, which we represented to the TDC as a strawman in the process, and 1 just wanted to talk about what the -- what those figures are so you have an idea. And in the last page of that packet normally breaks down what those dollars are Page 26 May 29, 2001 used for kind of in a short summary, In case you just got this packet today. The Project Manager 1 position was added last year to be -- to be -- to be filled this year. What's that all about? It's more eyes on target, more people watching the project, okay, because you've got 30- some -odd miles of beach. You can't be everywhere at one time. And so you've got another person out there watching the projects that are going on and making sure that you've got monitoring. And another -- another piece to that is, maybe we can contract less out in particular areas and -- and have this person to take a look at some cross - sections and things like that, so we can cut some cost on that side of the house and still have enough folks to make sure we've got a good program that -- that works out. 1 would tell you from -- If it wasn't for Dr. Staiger and the help from the City of Naples in this process and the help from the City of Marco Island with their -- with their other committee, we would have been strapped in years past, because we have been doing this on a shoestring. And so we're feeling it out a little bit better to make sure that we've got good execution. And one of the things that Dr. Staiger mentioned, yes, we put -- we put 41 tons -- excuse me -- 41,000 cubic yards of material out on -- out on those beaches, and -- and there wasn't a word heard, nor were there rocks, nor were there any lawsuits, and that's good news. There is another nine -- 9,000 cubic yards that we have on hold in case we have some severe erosion during this hurricane season that we can bring to bear in order to take care of that. But we plan to have multiple contractors with sand that's been approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection that you've had the opportunity to sample -- hopefully, not taste -- and -- that you've seen and it meets all the specs and -- and that they're waiting, and then we -- Page 27 16J1 May 29, 2001 instead of having one source and do it in a hurry -- 1 always chuckle the -- the reason -- the reason that this Is here is because of sunshine, sand, and surf; that's why tourists come. And you have to do beach renourishment around the three Ts, which are tourist, tarpons, and turtles, and so that gives us about a 90 -day window of a 360 -day year to put sand on the beach or do any major construction. And you get a little bit of time in the fall and a little bit of time in the spring in order to do that, so it's limited. So you really have got to have your projects ready to go, permits in hand, in order to get at that stuff in those short periods of time. And then you do need those -- those eyes that are watching to make sure we are getting our monies worth and somebody isn't taking a shortcut. MR. GRAY: Is that 9,000 that's in reserve, did that come from the $50,000 that was bought? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. GRAY: Okay. MR. MUDD: And that's -- that's paid for. All we have to do is say when we want it. DR. STAIGER: Jim, one -- one additional point, on this first item, which is the staff management fees, for the first five or six years of use of this tourist tax, these -- these fees were charged on each individual project as a -- as a percentage, and the beach committee asked Harry to just put it into basically one -- one application because it's -- it's essentially a full -time job for several people and to try to allocate It, you know, little bits and pieces through all of the projects seemed awful awkward; so it's -- it's essentially the staff support that the county needs to get these projects managed. And it -- it just made more sense to the committee five or six years ago or so to stop putting it in as a line item in each one of the projects and just have a separate budget for that staff support because it is essentially a couple of Page 28 wilm May 29, 2001 full -time staff members. And it just -- it just seemed a lot cleaner to do that, so that's why you have this one application for -- for that item. MR. GALLENBERG: It's not -- MR. ROELLIG: It's not the first time, as you indicated -- DR. STAIGER: Yeah, it's -- MR. ROELLIG: -- it's ongoing. And 1 don't recall the dollars last year, but -- DR. STAIGER: Yeah. Last three or four years, 1 think. MR. ROELLIG: Right. Right. MR. MUDD: Any questions on that -- on that first -- that first sheet. Then we will go to the second case which is Wiggins Pass Inlet Management. It's for $472,000. MR. GRAY: 1 have a question. On the fiscal years that were shown on the big ten -year chart, is that October through September? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. GRAY: Okay. MR. MUDD: Based on the fiscal year. MR. GRAY: That's the county's fiscal year, October through September? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. PIRES: Mr. Mudd, maybe 1 won't have these questions once we go over the other materials, but part of one of the questions indicates on page 3 of the application -- and all the applications -- is that the proposed project required by regulatory agency as a condition for approval /funding the Collier County Beach Restoration Project. As to this one as to Wiggins Pass, it says "Yes," without any further detail or back -up described. Would that be provided at some point? I'm not sure what that "yes" means in the context of the Page 29 [Ut Im May 29, 2001 professional services and construction activities for Wiggins Pass and the management plan. Some of the projects 1 think 1 can sort of ferret it out. This one I'm not sure that 1 understand. DR. STAIGER: It's -- It's called for by the Wiggins Pass Inlet Management Plan. And -- and that question is, is it part of the ongoing beach restoration project or past maintenance /dredging management project; that's the thing. All of these inlet management projects have a -- an inlet management plan that they are implementing and -- and so that's -- they're all essentially called for in the inlet management plan, either -- either out -year monitoring or periodic actual dredging and the engineering work that goes with the dredging. And that's what this one -- this one is for, is actually maintenance dredging of Wiggins Pass and the engineering that goes with that. MR. PIRES: And the inlet management plan is part of a permit that was issued by regulatory agency -- DR. STAIGER: Yeah. MR. PIRES: -- or governmental agency? DR. STAIGER: Yeah. The DEP some years ago indicated that they wanted to have these inlet management plans done for all the inlets they were going to permit periodic dredging for, and the -- the -- the sword hanging over everybody's head was, if you didn't have an approved plan, you had a lot harder time getting a permit to do -- to do the dredging. All the plan really did was say, "Okay, this is how much sand that is going into the inlet, and this is how much sand we have to take out of it." And there is a state law called the Swim Bill that says you have to bypass as much sand down drift as normally would do it if you didn't have the inlet there. So that's -- the whole thing is to make sure that the sand keeps moving in the system. And those plans are all in place. Humiston & Moore did one or two of them, Coastal Page 30 16J1 May 29, 2001 Engineering Consultants did a couple of them, SubOceanic Consultants they have -- they have been done by various groups of consultants around this area. But we have an active inlet management plan for every one of those inlets. MR. PIRES: And, again, you know, 1 don't mean to be redundant; the inlet management plan becomes part of the actual permit is a condition of the permits -- DR. STAIGER: Well, they're -- they're -- MR. PIRES: -- that is issued by the agency? DR. STAIGER: 1 think they're referred to in the permits, or the permit application itself refers to whatever the -- the sand budget is what it's referred to as. But what the sand budget calls for in bypassing is what the permit applicant is talking about satisfying in the dredging activity. MR. MUDD: Okay. Now, we can get -- we can get the members of the -- of the committee copies of the plans, if you -- if you so desire. And 1 -- anybody from -- how big are they? Carl, can you help me? A couple of inches thick? MR. GALLENBERG: 1 think we have enough papers as it is. MR. ROELLIG: Yeah. One for each -- MR. MUDD: If you -- if you have an interest, we can -- we can get those for you, okay. I'm not going to say that we're going to deliver them for you, but we can bring them out or wherever you would like to -- to put those and -- and take a look at the process. Just maybe it -- maybe it would be good to just have one or two of them at the next meeting so you can thumb through them and kind of see what they are. If you don't have experience with them, we can bring a couple of them in, this one in particular so that you have an idea of -- of what they consist of and how detailed they are. MR. GALLENBERG: i think that would be good as part of -- with maybe start calling it our general orientation -- Page 31 16J1 May 29, 2001 MR. MUDD: Sure. MR. GALLENBERG: -- that we can address next time. MR. STRAPPONI: Mr. Chairman. Jack Strapponi. Apparently these strand applications are pretty much a standard form. As 1 looked at them, they all have the same questions. And my question was -- and on the last page -- the second -to- the -last page prior to the project budget breakdown it says -- the last line it says, "Has the project been reviewed and recommended by the Beach Renourishment Maintenance Advisory Committee ?" Is it my understanding that that committee no longer exists and was replaced by this committee. MR. GALLENBERG: That's my understanding, yes. MR. STRAPPONI: Is that correct? MR. MUDD: And the way that he answered -- yes, sir. And the way that he answered him is "Yes, this application will be considered by the Coastal Advisory Committee upon implementation of their regularly scheduled meeting." They haven't changed the -- the form to bring the Coastal Advisory Committee, so -- so Harry put this -- put this process in, and the recommendation would come under separate cover. So -- MR. STRAPPONI: 1 take it in the future this application will actually change? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. GALLENBERG: And in the changeover of one committee to the next these were or were not reviewed by the former committee? MR. MUDD: These were not reviewed. MR. GALLENBERG: Were not -- were not. So it's just a typo, a matter of -- MR. MUDD: That's right. Well, this -- this basically was submitted before -- these things have a submittal time a lot -- a lot sooner than this meeting. And the TDC that looked at this Page 32 16J1 May 29, 2001 process happened in the first part of April, so it would have been the February /March time frame when they would have been reviewed. One of the -- one of the reasons -- and -- and Harry Huber asked me, he said, "Do you want to take this in front of the Beach Renourishment Committee ?" I said, "Well, you know, it would be a -- be a shame to get a Coastal Advisory Committee that comes up -- you get them organized, you get them sitting there, and then they all look at each other for a year because somebody else approved their program." I said, "That wouldn't be fair to them either. So why don't we just" -- it was a little cumbersome with the TDC to say, "Hey, it hasn't been approved, but here it is. 1 want you to see it as part of the overall package for the $9 million." wanted to make sure we had a placeholder there, that we didn't lose those dollars. But I didn't want to do a disservice to this committee and not give you the opportunity to review that application and -- and if there are any changes to be made or any additions to be made, that we could do that. MR. ROELLIG: I believe some of the applications from the City of Naples were approved by the former committee. DR. STAIGER: Yeah. The -- the two applications in there were. They were approved by the committee in March, but the rest of these were in prep at the time. MR. MUDD: This project maybe Humiston & Moore your rep - - do you -- do you have anything to say about Wiggins Pass Inlet Management? MR. MOORE: No, not right now. MR. MUDD: Okay. Basically what I'm gathering from the last page, professional services are coming into the tune of $72,000; and that's an estimate, and then construction of the maintenance dredging is 400,000. This price isn't -- isn't Page 33 ITIM May 29, 2001 necessarily set in concrete because you haven't awarded the contracts yet. So we can -- we can get underbids, but this is a budgeted amount. We're in the ballpark. Next project is Sea Turtle Monitoring, and there was -- there was a question in -- and -- and 1'd ask our -- 1 will call you the Sea Turtle specialist. Could you please come forward. There was some questions at the TDC meeting, why do we do sea turtle monitoring? And it was -- it was a pretty good exchange that was transpiring. Some folks on -- on -- on this committee know why there is sea turtle monitoring and some don't. And 1'd ask you to be so very kind to -- to give them the specifics of why this program exists. MS. KRAUSE: I'm Myra Krause, Senior Enviromental Specialist for the Collier County Natural Resource Development. And I did bring a letter with me that I have prepared for the tourist development committee, and it does explain why we need sea turtle monitoring. And it also has a -- I have got a copy for everyone -- it has a chart in the back that goes over every -- that goes over the different projects of beach. Nourishment, inlet management plans, et cetera. And the sea turtle permit requirements seem like they're getting a -- more and more intricate every year. There's different beach compaction studies that have to be done, including the normal sea turtle monitoring and quite a bit of reporting to the state and the federal government. And the chart pretty much goes through the major projects, and the -- the date of permit expiration on them. So sea turtle monitoring is required by -- they are protected. They are a protected species under the Endangered Species Act and also under the state acts. And if you -all would like 1 will prepare a formal presentation for you at one of your future meetings explaining more about the program and -- and we'll also take Page 34 fC�fil May 29, 2001 someone out -- if you -all would like to come out with us one morning monitoring, just let us know, and we can take you out and show you exactly what we do. Any questions? MR. STRAPPONI: I have a question. In your program I guess the nesting period is predictable season -wise. And this was probably obvious, but when we do get into renourishment, that's planned around that season so it doesn't interfere with? And what impact does that have after the fact -- after we've replenished, turtles come back to a -- to a new environment? Does it seem to have any impact? MS. KRAUSE: Well, we've done a lot of different types of beach renourishment. In the past we have used upland sands -- several sources of upland sand, hydraulic renourishment. In the beginning with the 1996, the major renourishment -- and also the 1999 Marco Island renourishment -- the nesting on the renourished beaches did go down for the first year, and incrementally we see the nesting coming back to normal. The sand that we just used on the Park Shore Beach, we have seven nests already -- on Park Shore and Hideaway. We are hoping that this new sand source will have less impact than some of the other ways we have done beach renourishment in the past. MR. STRAPPONI: Was that hydraulic or was that upland sand? MS. KRAUSE: No. This is our new upland sand. It's brand new. We have never been -- used this type of sand before, and sea turtles really seem to like it, so we are quite excited about that. And there are certain projects that do occur during sea hurtle nesting, and they require -- we have Hideaway Beach going on right now -- a dredging project and a renourishment project, and it required additional monitoring and incidental tape permit from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, biological opinions -- and Page 35 16J1 May 29, 2009 there's -- there is quite a lot Involved when do you do a project during sea turtle season. But it's been -- the county's experience in the past is that if you do it outside of season, there's a lot less permitting requirements, and it's easier to get a job permitted. MR. STRAPPONI: How long is the season? MS. KRAUSE: The season is officially from May 1st to October 31st. However, depending on the project if we're done early -- we know when the sea turtles nest, et cetera, et cetera, then the state and feds do give us a little bit of leeway in the October part of it. Many projects have also extended beyond the May 1st, and we start monitoring a month early -- beach and nourishment projects we start monitoring a month early, and the state usually gives us a permit extension to work the first couple of weeks in the nesting season. MR. MUDD: You get about 30 days wiggle room in the beginning and the end. MR. STRAPPONI: Have you ever had a situation where we are in the middle of a replenishment and the contractor was running behind schedule? What do you do? Stop the project? MS. KRAUSE: If you don't get -- don't get that permit extension, yes. But in the past we -- the permit -- you know, you contract with the contractors, and they have to have everything off the beach by April 30th or April 15th. I think the state is trying to open their windows up for sea turtles a little bit, and one month to finish the project has been enough in the past. MR. STRAPPONI: Typically, Jim, do those contracts have penalty clauses in them if they don't -- M R. MUDD: Yes. MR. STRAPPONI: -- complete by a certain time? MR. MUDD: Yes. And one of the things we need to look at as a county -wide in our organization, not only beach -- beach Page 36 16J1 May 290 2001 contracts and all the other contracts -- is make sure they are stiff enough in order to get their attention. When it's only $2,000 a day, and it's a multi - million dollar project, you know, that doesn't really get your attention. It's "So -- so charge me, okay, I will catch you on something else." I'm just telling you the way they work. And so -- then -there is enough site - condition changes out there that they'll get the days back. You just need to get their attention a little bit with a -- with a bigger hammer. It's just one of the things we're doing in all of our contracts are looking at the penalty issues. At the same time you look at penalties, you should have some incentives in there too, incentive clauses to get them done early, especially if you want to get through that process. MR. GRAY: Usually the courts will hold that if you have a penalty clause you have to have a clause up front for rewarding. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. ROELLIG: 1 might also add that Myra does a very nice annual report on the entire county beaches, so this funds also the end report. And I might also add, on beach renourishment there are cases like the Park Shore where there probably would not have been turtle nests in certain locations because during high tides the water went up to the vertical seawall. So with the added sands, you actually provided nesting opportunities which wouldn't have been there otherwise. MS. KRAUSE: A couple of those nests are in areas that did not have a beach several months ago. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MS. KRAUSE: Yeah. MR. KROESCHELL: Bill Kroeschell. 1 have a question for Myra. You're -- you're a full -time employee of the county; is that right? MS. KRAUSE: Yes, 1 am, sir. Page 37 16J1 May 29, 2001 MR. KROESCHELL: Do you have any help in this project? MS. KRAUSE: Actually, my -- my funding of me is not included in this application. MR. KROESCHELL: Oh. MS. KRAUSE: It funds -- we have two permanent staff, and we also have two temporary part -time staff. We have some volunteers and we also have an intern that helps us with data entry. But we have a lot of data entry. It also includes all of our equipment and -- just everything; administration of the project. MR. KROESCHELL: And your salary is not included? MS. KRAUSE: No, it is not, sir. MR. KROESCHELL: Do you have any -- any other responsibilities for the county other than the sea turtle project? MS. KRAUSE: Sea turtles, beach renourishment. We do do beach - legging compliance that is not part of this application; public awareness, budget, and just regular- administrative duties. MR. KROESCHELL: Okay. MR. PIRES: Mr. Mudd, as far as the $134,400 requested, does it show or not show up on the spreadsheet in the back? 1 think I missed it. Or is it part of some other aspect? MR. MUDD: I think it's part of the beach maintenance, the incremental beach maintenance, the dune structure miscellaneous, and the -- the beach raking. MR. PIRES: Okay. MR. MUDD: He's got it in -- he's got it sitting in there, but 1 -- I -- let me draw your attention to -- I think -- let me -- let me go back on that. Take a look at Section D. You remember 1 said had a difference in -- in this submission of two - thirteen and two - eighty and change, and 1 said Harry will have to talk to you about that process when he get's back; that's where it's sitting right there, okay, in his estimate. So it's sitting on D -1, project maintenance fees, administration. Page 38 16J1 May 29, 2001 DR. STAIGER: The program that Collier County has had working on sea turtles is been underway for quite a few years, and it has received a lot of applause and praise from the environmental community, which -- which I know -- in some cases 1 know some people on the TDC don't particularly enjoy that. But the fact is that it's an outstanding program, and it has produced a lot of very, very useful data, among other things, because a lot of people assume that if you renourish a beach you automatically destroy its usefulness for turtle nesting, and the fact is that our beach renourishments have demonstrated that the turtles will come back to the renourished beach and over time nest again. And so Myra -- the report that she produces every year, which summarizes all the data on nesting and false crawls and numbers of eggs that hatch versus didn't and all of that kind of stuff is -- is data that is very, very reliable data and data that is used by a lot of people who do turtle research because it's hard to find a lot of those -- those data that are reliable with a good amount of credibility behind them. So the program has been very well received. And the permitting agency is just -- you know, they don't want you to do anything on the beach without knowing what's going on with the turtles, and it isn't -- it isn't going to get any better. It's going to be that -- they're going to be that strict, if not more so. MS. KRAUSE: Any other questions? Thank you. MR. GALLENBERG: Colonel Mudd, one thing if the -- if the other members think this might be a good idea, we've got 22 projects listed here, and maybe we don't need to spend a lot of time on -- on each one of them this evening since we'll have the opportunity to June 7. Maybe of these there are some that are -- one might regard as routine and recurring in nature, last year the budget was X, this year it's X plus 2 percent. And then if members have specific questions tonight about some of the Page 39 16J1 May 29, 2001 projects, or conversely, since we're just getting geared up, if there are certain things that either you or Dr. Staiger feel that should be pointed out, then we'll be able to take that knowledge home -- MR. MUDD: Okay. MR. GALLENBERG: -- and deal with it again on what 1 would call our first regular meeting on June 7th. MR. GALLENBERG: Incremental beach maintenance is a million dollars. That's pretty much what we've been doing. In the process we've spent in the $900,000 range this last year. It has got the 5 percent in it. It's basically planned to put 50,000 cubic yards on the beach again this year. And -- and I can't tell you right now if the specifics on where it's going to be put have been -- have been delineated yet. Dr. Staiger, I don't think so. 1 think the money has just been budgeted. It's -- it's a habitual process and -- and that's one of the things that is up -- up to this committee to -- to point out where it's needed the most on the beach. And we need to give you some staff input on that and whatever your -- your constituents supply to you. Beach cleaning operations is for -- the next one is $210,000. It -- we basically have three rakes now, three operators; one on Marco, one in the City of Naples, and one In the unincorporated part of the county. And they go out on a daily basis and rake the beach, clean the beach. There is a program with the City of Naples now. If Dr. Staiger gets word from one of his scouts out on the beach that he sees rocks, he'll report that in. And we'll get it to the beach - cleaning folks, and they'll go out there and pick 'em up and get them out of the way in case they get washed up where they appear -- in that process. So that -- that seems to be working quite well and -- and by getting the -- by getting the three dedicated tractors and rakes and things like that seems to Page 40 16J1 May 299 2001 work a lot better. They only used to have two, and they had to switch them back and forth, and having them located in those in those positions seems to work out a lot better. Dr. Staiger, can you add anything to that? DR. STAiGER: Uh, well, one thing the -- the part of the -- uh, don't know if you would call it a settlement or conclusion of the -- of the discussions between the county and the -- the state on the rock -on- the -beach issue is that we have this equipment available to deal with the rock issue and -- and that is the conclusion that the state came to, I believe, was that you have done enough excavation and -- and shifting, and now what little rock shows up, when and if it does, you can deal with this -- this equipment. So there is one piece of equipment that actually sits at the city's public workyard. And if there is any kind of a problem on the beach at Vanderbilt or -- or the city those -- those machines are used, and that's part of our arrangement with the State to kind of settle this -- this whole permit- violation business of the rocks on the beach. MR. MUDD: The next piece on beach - cleaning equipment, it's basically a new rake that is needed on one of the tractors; that's the majority of it, and there are some incidentals like a compressor and whatnot. Number 71 beach inlet maintenance -- maintenance activities. 1 would ask you to just draw your attention to page 5 of the application. It's a series of -- it's a series of maintenance activities to -- to take a look at -- at two events for post- storm, beach grading, beach tailoring, dune maintenance, repairing T- groins, channel markers, and breakwaters. It's pretty much a routine process that transpires every year. The next issue is a — Is $471,000 for annual monitoring; that's -- that's a normal process that transpires every year. One Page 41 16JI May 290 2001 of the things that we want to look at in the out years is to see if we can't use the folks that go out there and do sea turtle monitoring to see if we can't teach them how to do some cross - sections and provide them with some training so they can get some eyes and ears out there. We can start reducing some of the contracted amounts that we have there and -- and see if we can't get the maximum amount of efficiencies out of the people that we have that are already under -- on the county payroll to make sure that they're doing a little bit more into that issue. And 1 have had some conversations with natural resources here in Collier County to see if we can't train those sea turtle folks -- 1 mean, for -- for a good seven to eight months of the year they are out intensely looking at turtles and turtles nesting and things like that. If there is some erosion or whatnot that transpires out there, then they can report those and hopefully give some of those measurements so we don't have to contract and put a contractor out doing the same things. There are some ways we can gain some efficiencies to do that process. Seems like to me -- seems like a lot of money to be paying for monitoring, and maybe we can take some dollars out of -- out of that pot in the future. Next application is for Hideaway Beach Renourishment. We did a little bit this year. This is a more robust project -- how much, Mr. Moore? Any help with this one? MR. MOORE: For the record, Brent Moore with Humiston & Moore Engineers. This is the area where we have two T -groin fields that have been installed on. Hideaway Beach, and we have been monitoring those. They're constructed out of sandbags because that's -- that was the first installation, and they wanted to review that performance. So through the years it's been truck hauling operations, and Page 42 16J1 May 29, 2001 there has been some of these temporary structures placed in the area where we have the highest erosion stress. Um, it's a very diagnostic system. Coconut Island has been migrating substantially. And we are trying to look at what's -- what's going to be the future for Hideaway Beach. Now, if we don't do anything and the temporary structures come out, then what are the property owners going to do? They are probably going to just erect seawalls along the whole length, and there goes the beach. So we are looking at and recommending to the county that they look at a larger -scale maintenance project or renourishment project to really add some sand to the system. And the other projects that we have been working on the state has acknowledged that there will be the need for some structures in the higher erosion areas to try to work in conjunction with the nourishment. So this is a step to kind of look at the Hideaway Beach along. Big _Marco Pass as a whole, which really needs to be done so ... MR. MUDD: 1 draw your attention to the last page again. This isn't basically putting any sand on the beach; this is basically making sure that we have a plan so that when we're ready to put sand on the beach we are able to do it. As he mentioned before, this is a complicated issue. Because if you have got -- you've got a migration of an island that is moving. When you have an island that is moving down the channel, then it makes it very difficult to figure out if the T- groins are working because the one that you used to have there that was protecting it is now exposed, and it's not doing the job that you had. There's things that people can talk about chevrons in the middle of the channel where they hold -- hold the sand in that process. They did -- on this island they did some exotic species Page 43 16J1 May 29, 2001 removal, and it -- it has caused the island to move even quicker as far as its erosion pattern is concerned. So there's -- it's a complicated issue. it's just not something easy to do and, "Oh, by the way, we're just going to go out there and -- and put the sand on the beach." You can put it there, but is it going to stay there? So they're taking a good hard look at this complicated problem because it has a lot to do with The Conservacy and some -- and some other folks and what they are trying to protect. MR. GALLENBERG: What is sand search for $130,000? MR. MUDD: What they are going to do is go find -- out there in the offshore, they're going to take a look and -- and survey a place that has sand that meets the specification that can be hydraulically dredged and put on the beach, sir. MR. STRAPPONI: Excuse me. You talked about removal from these -- this pine removal here. Is that the Australian pines that were removed? Why were they removed? Because they are foreign? MR. MUDD: Exotic species. Somebody -- I don't know the history. Dr. Staiger, I'm talking out of turn. DR. STAIGER: That island belongs to the -- it's part of the Rookery Bay Reserve. And the -- they had a major program over the last few years to remove all the exotics from Key Island, and they -- they also took the all the Australian pines off of Cannon Island and -- and there was an awful lot of vegetation there that seemed to be stabilizing that if it's gone -- they have planted other things; seagrapes and stuff like that in its place, but that was done by the -- by the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve did it. And there was an awful lot of concern raised from Hideaway Beach and other areas on Marco Island about it because it -- it was -- seemed to be providing a certain amount of storm protection to Hideaway Beach, and if the island keeps maneuvering around in that inlet, the storm protection Page 44 16J1 May 29, 2001 shifts. So it's -- Mr. Steniker, 1 think is the -- who lives in Hideaway, and he's very familiar with all of that stuff. But that was not something that was undertaken by the county. It was undertaken by the research reserve. MR. STRAPPONi: Jon, was the county consulted or brought into the loop what their intentions were? DR. STAIGER: 1 think there was -- I think there was a certain amount of information transferred. I'm not sure whether there was any permission asked or anything like that. I mean, 1 know that they did -- they let us know they were going to be a bunch of tree removal on Key Island, and then they went ahead and did it. I don't -- don't remember. It has been several years ago. But it was in -- in some ways a public relations disaster for the reserve because a lot of people were unhappy about it. MR. STRAPPONI: I understand. 1 would be. MR. GRAY: In connection with this particular one, 1 would like to point out within the year -- with the old committee, the old beach renourishment committee, there was a considerable amount of money spent, 1 think, with Coastal Engineering in studding sand sources offshore. And I don't know -- you know, this is kind of a ticklish subject because of what has happened with Coastal Engineering and the lawsuit and all of that. But 1 don't know if we -- if staff or this committee still has available to it those studies that were made, because 1 know it was either our last meeting or the meeting before the last meeting when they presented a pretty detailed report of their sand search and brought some specimens in, Dr. Jon. DR. STAIGER: Yes. MR. GRAY: I don't know how to -- I'm trying to figure out a way to bring this into this new committee's province, if at all we can do it. Page 45 16J1 May 29, 2001 DR. STAIGER: Well, that was -- that was a formal report on a project to -- to the -- to the county, and so Harry has that information, and I'm sure that the -- you know, when this project goes forward they will be able to -- to base some of their searching on that. The sand that did the original renourishment on Marco came from -the shoal system off of Big Marco Pass and the shoal system off of Caxambas, and the logical place for the sand to come to do this work on Hideaway would be somewhere out there in the shoal system off of Capri, Big Marco Pass Area. The search is going to have to be to make sure that -- that the sand is available out there and that taking it away doesn't create some kind of a change in the way the waves impact the northwest corner of Marco, because that was -- when we were looking for sand for the Naples beach, we looked at that area. But there was considerable question about whether taking a million cubic yards of sand out of that shoal system would create something that would then impact the beaches on Marco adversely, and -- and it was one of those things. There were a couple of different engineering opinions out there as to whether it would or would not have an affect. And rather than get into a big court fight over this thing, we just opted to forget about that thing. But if you are looking at -- at a lesser volume of sand and you get far enough away from the beach -- and this is something that Brad Moore is very familiar with -- that there is sand out there. It's whether or not it is suitable material. The stuff that Coastal found, I think, that would be suitable for just about any beach in the county is down off of Cape Ramono where it's just going and sitting down there in a huge -- ever increasing shoal. MR. MOORE: Just to help you a little further in that, there is a lot of sand out there, but everybody seems to be trying to protect a different interest. And there is a lot of concerns about Page 46 16J1 May 29, 2001 potential impact to Sand Dollar Island and shore bird nesting activities that occur out there. One of the things that we're doing right now is we are doing a feasibility -- brief feasibility study to look at the different areas and contact the state, and these are the areas that we would like -- the county would tike to look at. The county has not selected a consultant to do this project yet, but one of the first things that I'm sure would naturally occur would be to look at any other reports in the areas that have been evaluated so as not to duplicate it so that you can make good use of your reports -- MR. GRAY: That's my concern. MR. MOORE: Yeah. Absolutely. That should be a concern. That shouldn't be a problem, I suspect. MR. GRAY: Okay. MR. MUDD: Without further questions, the breakwater modifications that Marco Island -- if you look at the beach, you see the breakwaters out there. 1 scratched my head the first time I looked, and I said, "What the heck are those doing out there? " 1 came back and talked a little bit, and then as 1 talked with Harry - what they are basically going to do, they are going to extend the breakwaters that are out there right now. They're doing the job, but they are not doing the fully intended job as they got put in. And so they're going to bring them a little bit closer together and -- and spread them out just a little bit in order to -- to have a breakwater stop the erosion that is occurring and hopefully leave some sand in its -- in its wake; that's what that process is all about. The engineering and design is 60,000. There Is the MODS to submerge land easements for $10,000, and the construction is estimated at five- seventy -one and there is a contingency of 64,000 or 10 percent as far as that total is concerned; and this is a relatively new project, as the Chair would like to have us bring Page 47 16J1 May 29, 2001 out. Caxambas Pass permits and dredging is pretty much standard -- done -- done in the past. It's time for this particular project on its -- on its cycle to -- 1 guess it's on a four -year cycle based on -- it's more like a seven -year cycle. And this is its -- this is its year to take a look at that. Now, you've taken a look at the hydraulic survey in order to find out if the shoaling is there to make sure there's time in order to do the dredging. It isn't just that every seven years you go out there and everything -- you are just going to do it whether it needs it or not; that is not the case. You make sure the hydraulic survey is out there and it basically shows you that there is enough shoaling that requires a dredge event to transpire; so that part is there. The next one is Hideaway Beach Access Improvement. This is a new project and -- and probably the last one we'll talk about tonight unless there is -- unless there is any comment. On Hideaway Beach to get from Tiger Tail to Hideaway you normally have to wade in water in order to get there. There's two alternatives that I've seen in this process; one is to put a renourishment of sand between the two so that you can walk over, and the other alternative I've seen is a boardwalk that goes some -- I'm really out of turn here, okay, because I have seen it briefly -- 1 think it was eighteen hundred feet. Don't quote me on it -- in that ballpark. And 1 think it's about a four -foot width. And 1 think it's negotiable of how wide you want it to be, and is there places that you can dismount the boardwalk in case you want to go out there and wade in the water? Those are all discussions that -- that need to take place and -- and pending your approval once we get some feasibility of the project and something a little bit more concrete as we go along. But that's been brought forward a couple of times that -- that live seen it at least. It's Page 48 16J1 May 29, 2001 something that we might want to discuss a little further. 1 think we have some -- some Interests In the -- out there in the audience, I think, on this particular project; is that correct? Do you have -- if you could just kind of give me a brief overview or show somebody a picture so they have a better idea, I would appreciate it. Is that okay? MR. KROESCHELL: We have a picture in this handout that you gave us, in case nobody has looked at it. It's near the end. COURT REPORTER: Excuse me. I'm going to need a break to change my paper. I'm out. MR. MUDD: Mr. Chairman, is it okay if we take a five- minute break? MR. GALLENBERG: Absolutely. MR. MUDD: Does everyone know where the facilities are on this -- on this hallway? They are down at the end of the hall. The ladies room and the men's room are both in the same location, not necessarily the same doors, though. (A short break was held.) MR. GALLENBERG: Colonel Mudd, are we ready to start again? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. If I can get your attention again, we can start the meeting again. I have been told in your packet there is -- there is a display of Hideaway Beach. The first one that has the blue outline -- that's -- that's the walkway, the pedestrian walkway. Yeah, the four feet was right, and it's about 1,440 feet. I said about sixteen. And if you turn to the next page you will see that outline, the blue, the small walkway is still there that basically covers that outlet. But then you will see the median line of where the beach renourishment and sand would go behind so that you would have a walkway to Tiger Tail and Hideaway. Those are the two alternatives that we have seen so far that Is part of that project. Page 49 16J1 May 299 2001 There has been a small report, fact sheet, that has been prepared. We need to get that to you before the next meeting. What we tried to do with this packet was to give you a visual of what some of the projects look like and -- and what transpires during them so that you have an idea as we came to this. As 1 said before, Harry was out. I found out about it, okay, this morning when 1 came to work. 1 said, "This isn't good." 1 said, "Make sure Jon -- Jon Staiger comes to the meeting. There is the institutional knowledge, please. So 1 had them put together as many visuals as we possibly could to give you an idea, depending on what your experiences were. What 1 would like to do is -- is stop at that juncture, as far as the projects are concerned, because those are the $4.5 million that -- that we -- basically we're going to put in front of the board that had to have your approval or your recommendation on. The Pelican Bay Service Division came up and -- and defended their $205,000 for Clam Pass monitoring and dredging. The parks and recs department, I have Barefoot Beach access parking lots, rennovations of parking lots, redecking boardwalks at Barefoot Beach, Barefoot Preserves, South Marco Beach access, and a refurbishment of Gulf Shore Boulevard North access. And then the City of Naples defended their projects to the tune of $94,000 in front of -- in front of the TDC at their meeting in March or April. And so what 1 would like to do at -- at this juncture is if you have any additional questions, 1 would like to take them and take some notes and see if 1 can get you those answers before the next meeting on the projects. MR. PIRES: Mr. Chairman, if I may, maybe just a couple of procedural things that might help at the next meeting. If it's the desire of the committee, possibly, the minutes of the TDC, as opposed to have a rehash of all the presentation. If they are that Page 50 16J1 May 29, 2001 detailed presentations before the TDC that they were verbatim transcripts, such as this proceeding, 1 think that might be helpful. And if it's possible, once again, from the committee's perspective, if there is someone from the county attorney's office to help advise the committee as a whole or a primer, a real quick primer, on Sunshine Law and conflict -of- interest issues to make sure that we don't run afoul of any of those issues. Just a suggestion, I'm not sure what the committee's thoughts would be on that. MR. GRAY: Our -- I'm sure some people are familiar with the rules of Sunshine. Is there anyone not familiar with that, which says, in essence, when you serve together on a public body, you can't -- we can't speak with each other about matters that are before us or could come before us unless we're in a public meeting, such as this; that's Sunshine in a nutshell. MR. MUDD: And what 1 will do is have the county attorney or his representative show up at the meeting and give you that short primer. 1 will also check out and make sure that we didn't - - didn't mess up and not have somebody swear in, okay. That is another issue that 1 will -- that 1 -- work for the next process. So there are a couple of unanswered questions that 1 had prior to coming to this meeting today as we went on, one of which is, do we have a recorder, okay, and we made sure that that was on track and tried to stay out of as much trouble as we possibly could. So 1 will answer -- at least get those questions answered and have somebody here from the county's attorney office. If there -- if there has to be a swearing in or signing of particular documents, 1 will make sure they are available at the -- at the June 7th meeting too. MR. GRAY: Back to the projects. 1 just had one -- one overriding question and that is the total funds for the projects we discussed is about 5.3 million, and the spreadsheet anticipates Page 51 16J1 May 29, 2001 revenues without even any carry forward of about six -eight -- if 1 have done my math right -- six - seven, six- eight. It also shows anticipated expenses of about 7.4 million. Even if we take away the five hundred catastrophe -- I would like to bridge the gap between the 5.3 million and the numbers on the spreadsheet. MR. MUDD: Okay. MR. GALLENBERG: To explain that do we leave some leeway for other proposals, or do we anticipate other proposals coming in? MR. MUDD: There's some -- there's some room In this budget. MR. GALLENBERG: We don't need to discuss that tonight, but 1 would like to, perhaps, discuss at our next meeting. Do we have any other questions or comments? MR. ROELLIG: 1 would like to make a comment. We do have projects that were approved -- that was by the prior years, but the funds weren't expended, such as the -- the Naples project on the sand net -- DR. STAIGER: The Parker -- MR. ROELLIG: -- the sandtrap. So we -- those funds would presumably start being expended in the year 2002, so does that -- don't see it on the spreadsheet. 1 mean, they may have been previously approved. Apparently the monies have already been set aside for the Parker Sandweb Project and other projects; that probably should be on this sheet somewhere as an expenditure. DR. STAIGER: Yeah. 1 think it's -- MR. ROELLIG: The revenues have been set aside, as I understand it, but the expenditure has not been approved yet. MR. MUDD: Yes. What 1 need to do -- MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. MUDD: -- it's got Parkers Sandweb on it. I need to have Harry explain the previous part -- part of the things that we'll do Page 52 16J1 May 29, 2001 from a staff perspective is to give you an explanation of expenditures previous versus projects that were done, not done for some strange reason, whether it's been carried forward in -- in, for instance, the Parkers Web, and lay that process out for you. MS. LUPO: Is there a procedure for asking staff questions between meetings, and to whom do we direct those? MR. MUDD: 1 would say that you would direct them to Harry Huber, okay, the project manager. And then he'll try and get those answered for you. You can either give him a call, or you can get them on e-mail. But if you have a burning desire, use my phone number right now, okay, and it's 732 -2540, and 1 can get that information for you. MR. GRAY: As 1 understand it, under the Sunshine Law, we can correspond, however, with Harry -- MR. MUDD: Absolutely. MR. GRAY: - e -mail, phone -- MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. GRAY: -- letter, what have you. It's okay to do that. We just can't do that amongst ourselves? MR. MUDD: Right. MR. GALLENBERG: One housekeeping item, if there's nothing else that anyone has, is that each of us probably knows some of the other members here, but 1 doubt that anyone knows all the other members. So maybe In our next packet, while we'll get to know each other soon enough, that if we can have a contact sheet, so to speak, even though we can't contact each other; name, affiliation, perhaps a number or address or something like that. MR. GRAY: Yeah. That will be good. MR. MUDD: 1 will give you Harry's e-mail, things like that, certainly. Page 53 16J1 May 29, 2001 MR. GALLENBERG: And then is there anything else from any of the members? We have some members of the public here. MR. MUDD: Yeah, we have public input. MR. GALLENBERG: If there is public Input, we would be ready to take that now. MR. MUDD: Anybody? Nobody basically gave me a written sheet. MR. GALLENBERG: Everyone is nodding no. So if there is nothing else then, pending final confirmation that we have this room for Thursday morning, we'll meet next on June 7th at 1:30 p.m. And for tonight, then, we're adjourned. Thank you. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 7:30 p.m. COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE GARY GALLENBERG, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY EMILY C. UNDERWOOD, RPR Page 54 COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETINI 6J 1 JUNE 27,2001 — TUESDAY 1:30 — 2:30 P.M. Gary Galleberg, Chairman Phone: 593 -0341 Office Fax: 593 -0344 David A. Roellig 6000 Pelican Bay Blvd., #504 Naples, F134108 Phone: 594 -2210 William O. Kroeschell (won't be in town) 272 Mooring Line Drive Naples, FL 34102 Phone: 262 -6639 E -mail: juneandbillk @aol.com John P. Strapponi 589 St. Andrews Blvd. Naples, FL 34113 Phone: 775 -2882 Fax: 776 -0249 E- mail:., jstrapponi @aol.com Anthony P. Pires 209 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 649 -6555 Fax: 649 -7342 e -mail: apires(a)wpl- lezal.com James L. Snediker 3000 -417 Royal Marco Way Marco Island, FL 34145 Phone: 642 -3566 (1- 734 - 429 -2589) Robert D. Stakich P.O. Box 1907 Marco Island, FL 34146 ? ?? Phone: 394 -8881 Phone: 642 -6069 Robert E. Gray 4001 Gulfshore Blvd., N.; Unit #205 Naples, FL 33940 Phone: 434 -5783 16J1 Ashley D. Lupo 478 Echo Circle Marco Island, FL 34145 Phone: 394 -8192 (Office) Phone: 389 -1483 (Home) Jon Staiger (213 -1030) JU 4"l ft� ...................... L / CGC'Khi TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE June 7, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Area Advisory Committee met on this date at 1:30 p.m. In REGULAR SESSION in Building F of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRPERSON: Gary Galleberg Anthony P. Pires, Jr. David Roellig John P. Strapponi Ashley D. Lupo Robert B. Stakich William Kroeschell Robert Gray NOT PRESENT: James L. Snediker ALSO PRESENT: James Mudd, Public Utlilities Administrator Roy Anderson, Public Utilities, Director of Engineering David Weigel, County Attorney Page 1 JUL6J4 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We'll call to order the June 7th, 2001, meeting of the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee. We'll call the roll. I'm Gary Galleberg, present. Mr. Roellig. MR. ROELLING: Present. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Kroeschell. MR. KROESCHELL: Here. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Gray. MR. GRAY: Here. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Strapponi. MR. STRAPPONI: Here. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Pires. MR. PIRES: Here. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Snediker. (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Lupo. Pardon me, Ms. Lupo. MS. LUPO: Here. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Stakich. MR. STAKICH: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All present except Mr. Snediker. Item on our agenda, presentation to the advisory committee members on a review of the government and the Sunshine laws. MR. WEIGEL: Thank you, Mr. Galleberg. And hello, committee members. Some of you I've worked with before and some not, but it's certainly a pleasure to be before you today. I'm David Weigel, your county attorney, and I wanted to take the opportunity -- we appreciate that you could put us on your agenda so that we could discuss briefly an overview of the government -- governant (phonetic) and the Sunshine Law. And, as you are aware, this committee, as approximately 39 other committees of the Board of County Commissioners, as well as Page 2 JU16J4 the -- the board itself, is subject to the strictest Sunshine Law in the country, and that is the Florida Government in the Sunshine Law, which is found in Section 286.011 of the Florida Statutes. It actually even has a reference in the Florida constitution, so it's certainly here to stay, it would appear. I've provided for you -all a booklet, perhaps a book -- it's big enough -- and it has four tabs in it. And the first tabbed area is the "Government in the Sunshine Law" materials that we have. And you'll note within that first tab three types of materials that have been provided. After you get past the bullet -point pictures that we have which would have been a PowerPoint presentation, which technically we can't do -- but after you get past that, you'll find that there is a synopsis and discussion of the Government in the Sunshine Law. Also included is what 1 call the December 12th, 1995, county attorney memo on the Sunshine Law which- was provided at that time to the commissioners, all county advisory committees and boards, and their liaisons with the hope at that time that it would continue to be transmitted to new members and new committees as they were created. To some extent that was fulfilled but not entirely, so we've included that material with this package today. And then the third element in the package that you have is an Attorney General memo from 1992, 1993. I've noted on that memo that although the material is dated, that which is there is still valid. It also includes a public records law synopsis which 1 think you'll find helpful as a reference point in regard to public records and your activities on behalf of government in Collier County. Why are we here about the Sunshine Law? Well, we're here to talk about the Sunshine Law because you have put yourselves in a position of volunteer service, civic service. You're working hard, going to be working hard over a potentially long period of Page 3 time, and your efforts shouldn't go unrewarded, but they also should not be put at risk. And there's certainly no need for individuals of this committee to find through their efforts that there is either a technical violation, a meaningful violation, or even a perceived violation of the Government in the Sunshine Law. And so the materials we provide you today and the discussion I'm going to give you in just a few minutes -- it will take just a few minutes -- is here to make sure you're on the right track and also give you opportunity to answer -- to ask and have answered the workaday questions that may come along the line here. Now, Sunshine Law requires only three things. And if you wish to follow what would have been the PowerPoint presentation, under Tab 1 you'll see several pictures. The print's a little fine. 1 have to use my glasses. But -those -- I'm going to be following that format there, and we would actually be on the second picture on what's called page 1 in the first tab. The Sunshine Law really requires just three things: that the meetings of public boards and committees must be open to the public; secondly, that reasonable notice of the meeting must be given to the public; and, third, that minutes of the meeting must be taken. Sounds pretty simple. Sometimes in the practice it gets a little more difficult. Now, the meetings must be open to the public. In this case you're here in a boardroom; it's a very accessible facility at the government center. And as long as you're meeting in facilities like this, 1 expect you'll never have a problem with that element of the Sunshine Law, and that is that the interested public, those that wish to come at any given day for a noticed meeting, will have an opportunity to see the decision - making process in action, which is what you have in regularly -- in your regular- Page 4 JU46X1 noticed meeting. This is the decision - making process. But, secondly, there has to be adequate notice provided to the public so that they will come to these meetings, if they have a desire to, to observe the decision - making process. An adequate notice can take several forms, and it has to be reasonable under the circumstances. The county's typical notice requirements and procedures that we follow is through -- through our pers -- public information department, is that a committee such as this will have a notice that is transmitted to all of the print media, transmitted to the electronic media, television stations. It will be posted at various regular- noticed places around the county. It's available typically on -- on the government TV channel, Channel 54. We try to make it as available in as many different access points that the different kinds of public that pick up information in different ways will be aware of the meeting. If there's something controversial, if there's something that is of great public importance in the eyes of the public, they have to have the opportunity to know to be there, but they also have to have the opportunity ahead of time, appropriately ahead of time, as opposed to last- minute notice, so that they can attend a public meeting. We've found in the past when our Board of County Commissioners has wanted to have a -- an emergency or special meeting and the time is very, very tight, county attorney office has worked with the state attorney here posing the question: "if we put notice out with less than 24 hours before the board wants to hold its meeting and we get it out on the TV and we post it in the libraries, physically post it on the libraries and the museum and other -- other public places in the county but that -- that time of notice is less than 24 hours before the proposed board meeting, we asked the Amira Swett, the local representative for Page 5 JU&6J4 the state attorney, if a challenge was presented concerning an alleged violation of the Sunshine Law for the Board of County Commissioners under those circumstances, would you dismiss the challenge upon the basis of reasonable notice and back- breaking efforts to get it out in a very short period of time? And - - and Miss Swett indicated to me that, no, out of hand she wouldn't dismiss the challenge. So we came back and advised our Board of County Commissioners. "we think we've done wonderful notice in a very short period of time. We're trying to put this thing together for you, board." but at the same time we must advise the board -- and we did -- that they might be at some risk if a challenge were to be filed at the state attorney level concerning an alleged violation of the Sunshine Law. And so our board opted not to have the meeting on that Friday. They had the meeting on the following Monday afternoon. We got notice out with a few days' notice, and there was no challenge filed. But beyond that we also knew that we had coordinated well with the state attorney office. So in regard to notice, working with your liaison, this committee itself, the county attorney office will always be available to assist and make recommendations concerning the scheduling that you may have for the meetings so that you can conduct your business. You'll want to get your business done. You want to do it efficiently. Business that is conducted contrary to the Sunshine Law is business that is not given legal validity. So if you miss one of the elements of the Sunshine Law at a regular meeting that you have, whether it's notice or the lack of people to access the facility or failure to take minutes, it's very possible that one of the outcomes of a failure to meet the Sunshine Law is that the very business that you did in good faith, Page 6 ,UJ541 bringing people in, experts, whomever, will be ruled null and void and have to be redone. And that's a separate and apart from any challenge to you individuals on a civil or criminal liability standpoint for the potential violation of the Sunshine Law. What you'll find as a committee from time to time -- 1 know this is a relatively new committee, this incarnation. You may find from time to time that you will want to break out into subgroups. You may want to have subcommittees to perform an assignment for you. That's okay, not a problem. But you must take into account that that subcommittee may well have to abide by those three requisites of the Sunshine Law also; that is, the subcommittee is performing a function which is part of the decision - making process and information - gathering, decision - making process of this committee. So, therefore, it and as a subcommittee may have to provide reasonable public notice, reasonable access to see what they're doing, that subcommittee is doing, and that minutes must be taken of the activity that the subcommittee does. There is an exception to that, and that exception is when an individual from a committee or a group of individuals of a committee are delegated pure fact - finding tasks from the committee at large -- in whole. Those two or more persons of the committee who go and perform the fact - finding project can go out, don't have to have notice, can ask questions and get facts. They still can't really talk to each other about the decision - making process, so that can be a problem from time to time. Another thing to keep in mind is, when is a -- when are the members of a committee potentially subject to having a meeting outside of the Sunshine? Well, it's anytime that two or more members come together. It doesn't take a quorum. It doesn't take a supermajority. It's just two or more members getting together. And if two or more members should discuss matters Page 7 JU4 6J4 that reasonably would be expected to come before this committee or, in fact, are part of their ongoing agenda with this committee, then it would be a violation of the Sunshine Law for two or more members to come together in any setting outside of the regular- noticed, public access, minute - taking type of circumstance to conduct the business that is really the business of the committee as -- as a whole. You'll find in the December 1 -- 22nd, 1995, memo that I've provided you what 1 call the workaday questions and answers that you may -- that you may have as you -- as you go about your business in the future. It discusses chance meetings in restaurants. It talks about where two or more members may find themselves at a civic association, a neighborhood association, maybe at the Heart Ball. You may find yourself at some philanthropic endeavor. These things are not problematic for you as individuals to go to, but 1 will tell you how we advise our Board of County Commissioners and advise and advise them. And that is that they may find themselves at the civic organization, Republican executive committee. It could be Second District. It could be East Naples Civic Association. More than one commissioner may be there. In your case more than one committee member may be at a function which is not your function; someone else is holding it, but you're there. If it's purely a social function, things of that nature, well, you can even talk with your fellow committee members there. Just don't talk about business. And we also suggest that if you are in a position where you come up against, brush up against, another fellow committee member in public, it's not a bad thing to have a totally outside party, nonconflicting party there to observe the kind of discussion that you may have had, whether you're talking about grandchildren or graduation or vacations or anything else Page 8 .ACr,TI but the business to which you're appointed. At -- at -- if two or more committee members should find themselves at civic associations where the discussion of the civic association may be matters that are pertinent to the work you do as a committee, well, that's okay for those committee members to be there. And they can answer questions from the -- from the chair of the civic association. They can even appear on the dais and talk to the public and answer questions to the public. The individual committee members can do this. But you cannot use that for a subterfuge for one committee member indirectly to talk to another committee member. What that means, then, is you may find yourself in a position of perception as well as technical alleged violation. And we, again, tell our other committee members and the commissioners, "Remember, if you put yourself in a position of a perception problem, we can defend you. We may win. -We may even tell them we think we'll win." but the fact is sometimes by the allegation the damage is done. And for some of the committees I've been handing out some of the recent copies of the recent newspaper articles that talked about the school board finding themselves together in a restaurant or even Board of County Commissioners recently at a Conservancy function where a question- answer situation came up. Those can be dicey, and even though there may be no complaint that's filed, by virtue of the fact that the committee members or board members may find themselves in a position of -- call it visual compromise -- it puts them on the defensive, and I think it -- it -- it takes them out of the -- being on the clear track for the position that they're appointed. We don't need controversy, so it's often better -- you know, discretion is the better part of valor sometimes -- to avoid finding yourself in positions where someone can cast an allegation, an Page 9 Jul 611 aspersion, even if it has no basis whatsoever. You may find yourself in your communications amongst each other -- well, let's put it this way: Communications amongst each other must be very careful. As with our board members, there can be one -way communications. We don't advise our board that that's a wonderful thing to do. But if Commissioner Carter says, "1 want to bring up X, Y, Z topic on the board meeting next Tuesday," he, in fact, can send an e-mail or a letter, a memo to the other committee -- commission members telling that, and he won't be in violation of the Sunshine Law. 1 can assure you that. But woe to the person who responds to that message because once you have communication between two or more committee members outside of a situation where the three requisites of the Sunshine Law are in place, then you have clearly potentially a -- a violation of the Sunshine Law. So the chairman, in this case, my example, shouldn't ask fellow commissioners, "What do you think of this ?" or "Shall 1 do this ?" or "Do two or more of you want me to put this on the agenda ?" never ask a question like that. That's what we tell them, and that's what 1 advise you. The same way with e-mail and telephonic conversations. You can't call each other and talk about business on the phone. That's outside the Sunshine. You can't do it on the computer. Again, it's outside the Sunshine. You're -- the -- the public has this jealous right to see every aspect of the decision - making process, and it's supposed to be done in the Sunshine with proper notice so that they can observe what's going on. That's pretty much the overview of the Sunshine Law, and you may have some individual questions, and I'm sure happy to answer any of those. But 1 also want to mention to you that if you should have questions that come up on the Sunshine Law, feel free to ask them. Field them, if you wish, through your Page 10 J.i6iI liaisons, or come straight to the county attorney office. We will respond individually. It doesn't take a vote of the committee to send a question to us. We're here for you, both individually as well as collectively, along that line. And although our office is not talking to you today about the public records law, the fact is, is you will create public records from time to time. Public records of this committee will be created, and the liaisons, the staff people will have those things. There are some admonitions, some requirements under state law that we would be telling you about in a little more in detail if we have an opportunity to address that in the future, and we look forward to do that. The gift and ethics presentation, which we're not making today, the materials for that are also in your book there. And think it makes for fairly interesting reading. If nothing else, you can see what some of the other -- what the Board of County Commissioners and the county staff have to contend with. This body having its role with a -- as a recommendatory body with certain decision - making authority may find itself at a slightly lesser mode of the gift and ethics requirements than the commissioners and the county staff themselves have to reckon with. But 1 think that it's -- I'm glad you have the material. It's there for source referral -- and be very happy to answer questions on those things in the future too. So with that I'm finished, but if you have any questions, I'm sure happy to respond, and thank you for having us. MR. GRAY: I'm curious. Is it okay for any of us as individuals to correspond with staff, support staff, for this committee, either by telephone, e-mail, regular mail? MR. WEIGEL: Excellent question. I'm sorry 1 didn't cover that. Yes, you as individuals can talk with staff. Staff can talk with you. Staff shouldn't be used as a go- between to get to other Page 11 JU16JI committee members, but you can clearly have ongoing unlimited dialogue with staff members. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And also it pertains just in -- among us as a committee. For example, you can speak to a commissioner because you don't serve on the same body. It just is restricted in this case to the nine of us. MR. WEIGEL: That's right. Thank you. Thank you very much. 1 appreciate it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Thank you, Mr. Weigel. MR. ANDERSON: Excuse me, Mr. Chairman. We're passing out the ordinances for the makeup of the board right now. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. MUDD: One of the things that we talked -- I'm Jim Mudd, public utilities administrator for the record. I'm sorry 1 came in late, Commissioner. 1 was in a meeting. Roy Anderson, did you introduce yourself? MR. ANDERSON: No, 1 haven't actually officially introduced myself, no. MR. MUDD: Roy Anderson is the public utilities engineer director. He comes to us from -- from Newport, Rhode Island, where he was the public works administrator up there, a new hire for us. Harry Huber works for him in his section. Harry's still convalescing. He had to go under the knife. It had -- it was a complication from last year's surgery, so he's trying to get back on his feet again. So, again, Roy and I are doing the best we can, what we're trying to get at. One of the things you asked for last time -- and we'll postpone it hopefully with your concurrence until the next meeting when 1 can get Harry on board -- you asked to go over the present program and how it's doing and those things that are carried forward. If you would be so indulgent to give us another month, and hopefully Harry will be on his feet, and he can give us Page 12 JU46JI all the nuances of that program and where it is and what things are moving forward or didn't get done two years ago. They're still on the plate and moving through that process. And 1 will tell you as -- as public utilities got this program, I found out that -- that an awful lot of that corporate institutional knowledge rests in Harry and nowhere else, so we're -- we're a little bit of -- at a loss on this juncture. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You don't -- you're not referring to the fiscal '02 work plan; you mean what's already in the pipeline? MR. MUDD: No. I'm talking what's already happening in some of the older programs that didn't get funded because of a permit issue, that the money's still there and it's rolling forward, and we're waiting for the permit in order to get that. And that -- that way we can bring the board up on the active programs that are actually -- that are actually on board and on -- on the -- on the table to be done so that we don't have to reinvent the wheel either. And we were hoping that Harry would be back and we'd have that as part of your agenda this time. It just isn't there. One of the things from the -- from the -- there was another question that asked about swearing in of committee members. That doesn't need to happen, nor does there need to be any documents that are signed. So we went through that request for legal service and got all of those things out of the way so we didn't have some kind of an infraction or have the second instance of an infraction, and the process doesn't have to happen. It's been approved by the Board of County Commissioners for -- for the membership of the committee, and -- and that's pretty much what they need. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So -- and there's no filing -- maybe this hasn't been asked. But is anyone required to file with the -- the state as a -- we're not state officials by serving on this committee. Page 13 jule6411 MR. MUDD: That's right. You're county officials. So -- and -- and the minutes -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: 1 think the term is public officials. There's a term, however, that requires -- MR. MUDD: I'll ask that question. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'm not sure of the term, but that may just be elected people. I'm not sure. MR. MUDD: But we went through the -- and I asked. 1 specifically got the -- after the last meeting 1 was a little unsure, and it came up. And 1 basically asked the question: Do I need to swear them in? Does there need to be documents that need to be done and filed? And -- and 1 was told no, but I'll go back and ask one more time. MR. ROELLIG: One other question. On the previous committee we had to do the short form of financial disclosure, whatever they call it. I -- 1 don't know if that applies to this committee or not. MR. MUDD: I'll ask the question. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. MR. MUDD: It's always -- financial disclosure is always an interesting -- MR. ROELLIG: It's a minimal thing, but it still was required on the other committee. MR. MUDD: Okay. The -- and -- and, Mr. Chairman, if -- if your members determine that they would like to -- to get the gift issue from -- from Mr. Weigel, he'll be glad to come in. There's two more parts that are in that booklet. He'll be glad to come back in and do a 15- or 20- minute and make sure everybody's up to speed on the committee and has all the issues in law just to -- to bring you up to date. But 1 -- 1'd leave that up to you based on what you've been given as far as a written product is concerned. And maybe -- I've Page 14 JA 6XI looked at the charts. They seem to be pretty self - explanatory, but there might be an issue or whatnot. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, 1 think what we can do -- we all have these binders, and each of us should look at them. And if you have any questions, as Mr. Weigel said, everyone should feel free to contact him directly. If there's an issue that you think merits a discussion with the group as a whole, raise that, and we'll make sure we get it on an agenda. MR. MUDD: 1 -- the -- another thing on the -- on the agenda that we were going to talk about this meeting was -- was No. 3 on your agenda. We distributed the ordinances to govern the advisory committee, and one of the things that we -- we're going to tackle this time around was the length of tenure of the members. Let me find it exactly in the -- in the ordinance. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: 1 think we have -- and this is so that there isn't a complete turnover in any given year. The terms are four years typically. But to get the ball rolling with us, we're going to have three members that have a two -year term, three members that have a three -year term, three members that have a four -year term. And 1 was thinking about that a little bit, and I'd be happy to take any suggestions. I just thought since we have three representatives from three different municipalities 1 guess you would call it -- the county, Marco, and Naples -- it would seem to me that one -- that -- that each -- each group should have a two - year, a three -year, and a four -year. And beyond that 1 just made little numbered slips to pull out of a cup. If anyone has a better idea or a different -- a different preference, that's how we'll do it. MR. ROELLIG: Sounds fine. . GALLEBERG: Okay. So 1 will do that. This is going to be a big drama now. MR. STAKICH: I'll volunteer for two -year for Marco. Page 15 J46J4 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. STAKICH: So that will eliminate that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Stakich then will be a two - year. I'm going to do it alphabetically by location and name. So Mr. Pires is going to be this one. And that is -- these are Post -its, so I'm going to have a devil of a time getting them open. Mr. Pires is going to havewa four -year term. Mr. Roellig is next. And he -- I can see it in here now, although I didn't see it before I pulled. He is the three -year term. That will make Mr. Strapponi a two. And if I recall the resolution correctly, any one of us may be reappointed, so it doesn't mean service is limited to that. It's just for your first term. I'm going to try to -- four, three, two, I'm going to see if 1 can get them all mixed up. Okay. Next is Marco. Ms. Lupo, we know we're not going to have the two -year term. That is a two, so I'm going to take the next one. Ms. Lupo will be three years. And Mr. Snediker, who -- is he still"- is he still on his same vacation? MR. MUDD: Yes. I -- 1 called him this week -- or last week. He -- 1 talked to him about what we did at the last meeting. He will have to miss this one, but he will be at the next one. He's still on a vacation. He was talking about Africa. MR. GALLEBERG: Oh, my gosh. MR. MUDD: I said don't bring back anything. MR. ROELLIG: He was a very faithful attendee of our other committee so ... CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Well, that's naturally very good to hear. Then Naples, how about if 1 let you do the honors for Naples since I'm one of the Naples people? This will be me since I'm first alphabetically. Four. Pick a second one. Mr. Gray, two . MR. KROESCHELL: Makes me three. Page 16 JU4 6XI CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And Mr. Kroeschell, of course, three. You can be sure this wasn't a setup since I pulled a four for myself. Okay. I'll read -- I'll read through this now. The Collier County reps, Mr. Pires will have the four -year seat; Mr. Roellig will have the three -year seat; Mr. Strapponi, the two -year seat. From Marco Island, Ms. Lupo, the three -year seat; Mr. Snediker, the four -year seat; Mr. Stakich, the two -year seat. From the City of Naples, Gary Galleberg, four -year seat; Mr. Gray, two -year seat; Mr. Kroeschell, three -year seat. And then I don't -- I don't know that we need it technically, but it's probably good practice if someone would want to make a motion to approve those terms to a second, and then we'll take a vote. MR. KROESCHELL: I so move. MR. ROELLIG: Second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We have a motion and a second. All those in favor, aye. (Unanimous response.) MR. GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) MR. GALLEBERG: It passes 8 -0. MR. PIRES: Mr. Chairman, Mr. Galleberg, is it possible -- as I'm not sure if the current iteration of the county's advisory board ordinance that has to do with attendance requirements. Maybe we just need to make a determination by this board that Mr. Snediker's absences are satisfactory -- satisfactorily excused so that there isn't any issue about him possibly -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We can -- yes, we can note for the record that they're excused absences. I don't believe we do have an attendance -- an explicit attendance policy in our resolutions. In reading it, I don't recall if 1 did see that. MR. PIRES: Yeah. I believe the county commission has Page 17 JA 611 adopted overall advisory board ordinance that addresses attendance requirements. MR. LUPO: There's -- it's Ordinance 86 -41 under Section 4. Can we get a copy of that? MR. MUDD: Yes. MR. PIRES: Do you want a copy? MR. GRAY: I would just like to note that 1 -- I would think it would be good for us to adhere to that, because in the previous committee we did have a lot of absences, and it really caused us problems. There were times we didn't have quorums and couldn't get things done. So I would be very much in favor of making sure that we follow some strict guidelines on that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, 1 think that's helpful too. And 1, quite frankly, don't know what 86 -41 says exactly but in -- MR. MUDD: Sir, it -- I have it. Mr. Pires gave it to me. "any board member shall be automatically removed" -- and this gets into attendance requirements. "any board member shall be automatically removed if he or she is absent from two connective board meetings without a satisfactory excuse or if he or she is absent for more than one -half of the board meetings in a given physical year. A member of the board shall be deemed absent from a meeting when he or she is not present during at least 75 percent of the meeting." CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MR. PIRES: There are some amendments to that also that would vary that, but 1 think it would -- that would be helpful for the board to see that to stress the importance of attendance as Mr. Gray's indicated. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Thank you. Now Item -- we're finished with that, if no one has anything else. Item 3 -13 concerns excerpts from the TDC minutes. MR. MUDD: You asked last time, sir, if you could -- if the Page 18 J46JA board mem -- or if the committee members could see the excerpts of the Tourist Development Council meeting prior to doing our budget for '02 to see exactly what was said during that meeting and what was approved and not approved. Roy, can you give me -- and -- and to -- to avoid going through the entire meeting, okay, we tried to pull out just the parts that had to do with the beach re -- beach renourishment and the Category A projects that were of interest to this committee. So that's what I've passed out to you as far as the TDC minutes. The -- one of the things that -- that might be of -- of some confusion -- 1 went before the -- the TDC asking for four -plus million dollars. 1 think it was 4 112 with change. And when I got finished, they gave me 8 million, the whole thing. That's not what I asked for, and that was a mistake on their part. You'll see on page 6 where it's asterisked, it says eight -- eight million thirty -seven -- thirty -seven thousand two hundred and nineteen dollars. That wasn't all Category A. That was the entire TDC budget. And the -- the chairman got confused and said, okay, we approve the -- the 8 million subject to the approval of the Coastal Advisory Committee of those projects on that -- on that sample draft document that we gave them. And we'll talk about that at some length. But just to -- to get -- let the -- the committee members see exactly what happened during that TDC -- I basically stood up, explained the program, and -- and told them that -- that the Coastal Advisory Committee was still in a formation stage, told them that one of the reasons that we didn't go in front of the Beach Renourishment Committee and get these approved it would be -- it wouldn't serve the new committee correctly if they just had to spend the year with somebody else's decision going through that process, and they should at least have a say in Page 19 Jun 6JoI what's going to happen in the '02 budget. And no -- no sense in being an absentee landlord for a year. And that was kind of the gist of what we were getting into. They concurred with that idea. They listened to our program, because it was part of the bigger program. And -- and 1 thought it was beneficial for us to -- to put that out in forum to make sure we had a bookmark in there, kind of a -- a placeholder so that when the budget was done that they didn't have to convene the whole thing over again and people would start fighting for a thousand dollars or a half a million here or there, that we already had our place set for those dollars. And so we were successful in accomplishing that in that process. They asked a little -- one of the members asked about turtle monitoring and -- and how that got involved in beach renourishment. And I think what our expert talked about last time and gave you a handout that talked about how you have to have turtle monitoring. If you're going to do any kind of renourishment projects or any kind of coastal projects, you've got to be able to monitor how you're impacting an endangered species, and that's part of the program. So it's -- it's -- it's -- you have to have it or you just -- you won't have your renourishment program. So -- and Marla runs a good program, as far as that's concerned. 1 talked to her today. Of interest, she said we had one big loggerhead that had problems on the pipes on Hideaway. They're doing a little bit of dredging down at Hideaway now. We've got an exception. One of the rather large female loggerheads got stuck on the pipes and couldn't lay her eggs and had about 12 of them laid around. We had one of our folks pick it up and bury it for her and get her back in the water so she wasn't disoriented. But that's how our projects can impact turtles. So we've got Page 20 Jul 6XI to be very careful after the 1st of May -- normally May you can get a waiver. You can also get a waiver in October, but you got to watch your waivers for your projects, and you've got to be very cognizant of the fact that you could have an adverse impact. And those pipes on the beach, those dredging pipes, did have an impact on that one turtle, but we worked it the best we could with a little bit of human interface. But that was a -- an issue; the turtle monitoring was an issue. It was only the really -- it was the only big controversial issue that I had. And -- and after the meeting was over, we got back with them with -- with the fact sheet and answered their questions as far -- as far as the turtle monitoring program was concerned. Subject to your questions, that's pretty much what happened in my part of the TDC when I presented, and that's what's in front of you in -- in written form. MR. ROELLIG: Mr. Chairman, 1 noticed outside that there apparently was a special TDC meeting this past Monday. Do you know anything about that? MR. MUDD: We're going to talk about that a little bit. We're going to talk about how they -- there's a new ordinance about how the money gets allocated, and we'll talk about -- we can either talk about it when we talk about -- MR. GRAY: I'm curious. What -- what is the difference between Category A and Category B? MR. MUDD: Okay. MR. GRAY: I've heard that come up before, and 1 just -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Also, Colonel Mudd, we -- we don't have to do it today. It could be today or it can easily be next meeting if we want to explicitly put it on the agenda, just a general overview for the members of -- of what the TDC does and how we relate to the TDC. It might be technically best to do that Page 21 JU4 6J4 next meeting. We'll put it on the agenda. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So that we can more fully understand how we fit into the entire process. MR. MUDD: Category A, sir; that's the finance beach park facilities or beach improvements, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion con -- control, including pass and inlet maintenance, shoreline protection enhancements, cleanup or restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access as these uses relate to the physical preservation of the beach shoreline or inland lake or river. Category B, to promote and advertise county tourism within the State of Florida, nationally and internationally, which encourages tourism with an emphasis on off - season visitors to Collier County. However, if tax -- tax revenues are expended for an activity -- for an activity, service, or venue or event, the activity service or venue or event shall have, as one of its main purposes, the attraction of tourists as evidenced by the promotion of the activity, service, venue, or event to tourists. Category C, because that's also -- there's a couple of them that I'll get through we -- we really relate to Category A, but there's a Category C in the tourist development, and that's to -- MR. GRAY: And all the money that funds these things comes through the TDC? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. GRAY: Okay. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. They -- they've always talked three pennies. I like to think of it as percent, but let's talk about it as three pennies for simplicity. Category A -- and this is what happened at that special meeting, sir, on -- on Monday for the Tourist Development Council. They basically were approving a new tourist Page 22 J46J4 development ordinance. And -- and what happens in this particular case is, the pennies came at us in two increments. There was a two -cent increment, and then later on about two years ago there was the third penny that came in. The third penny was specifically designated for Category A. The two pennies, the previous ordinance said 30 perc -- excuse me, 70 percent of those -- of those 2 pennies would go to beach renourishment Category A. The new ordinance says 50 percent. So in -- in other words, the Category A gets the 2 -- 2 pennies of the 3 that are collected in the tourist development tax, okay. Before the -- the other -- the other piece to Category A is we -- we put aside $200,000 each year for the Naples Pier for maintenance and renovation that comes out of Category A and that gets into the Category D part. And it's basically to acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate, and promote one or more fishing piers which are publicly owned and operated. And -- and so there's part of that designation that goes to the Naples Pier, and it comes out of the Category A to go into Category D. Category C is to acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate or promote one or more county -owned museums or museums that are owned and operated by not - for - profit organizations that are open to the public. And so that's kind of how it goes through the process. And we'll talk about the percentages. We have a handout for that. Am I right, Roy? MR. ANDERSON: Yes, we do. MR. MUDD: Let me give it to them right now while we're on the topic. Kind of give you an idea of how that breaks down. So in the Category A particular field, we could get into -- I won't call it a conflict, but we -- we would have to share some of the proceeds with park and rec if they were doing beach access. Page 23 JU4"I And one of the projects on the ten -year program that you've got is the Vanderbilt Beach parking garage, okay, and that has to do with -- and that's been in the paper. 1 don't have to go over the -- the process there, but it -- but it's there, and it's in part of the ten -year program, and we'll lay that specifically out when we get to the ten -year program as far as new business is concerned. But this is how -- and this is what they approved at the last meeting with the percentages as far as museums and -- and tourism and -- and then the money that they need for fishing piers in that process. So you've got A, B, and C. And, again, the D category comes out of A in the tune of about $200,000 a year for the Naples Pier right now. But that doesn't mean that we couldn't -- you couldn't, as a committee, establish a fishing pier someplace else and use those dollars. For instance, the Naples pier doesn't need to be renovated or repaired this year and there's money in that particular category and you -- you decided that there needed to be another fishing pier someplace else, maybe not in such a grandiose method but -- but another one where people could fish from, then we could go out there and use those dollars in order to get that done. Do 1 have any questions on the TDC rec -- sir? MR. STRAPPONI: Are these ones that have already been collected, or are these -- are these projected funds? MR. MUDD: These are -- these are projections. MR. STRAPPONI: Okay. MR. MUDD: You know, because we're not finished with '01, and then they're talking about '02, so it's a projection on what they'll get. They're pretty close, though. MR. STRAPPONI: Are they? MR. MUDD: They really are. They're pretty close. MR. STRAPPONI: Do you just adjust -- excuse me. You just Page 24 1.6jo I adjust accordingly if it's over or under? MR. MUDD: Based on the percentage, yes, sir. MR. GRAY: So we essentially are having funding for Category A, B, and C but not for D at this point? MR. MUDD: No, sir. We have -- we have funding for all of those. The D category isn't there because it's in the A category. That's the $200,000 1-talked about. MR. GRAY: Oh, okay. MR. MUDD: And in -- and in particular, we -- you as a committee deal with the Category A. There is another committee that talks on the parks and rec side of the house for beach access, and they will do the parking - garage issue, so we won't have to get into that. We'll concentrate on how do we update the beach and how do we work the control structures in that process. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But also we have -- on the ten -year spreadsheet we got last time, we have A, B, C, D, E, F. Those are not the same as -- A is not the same as A, etc. MR. MUDD: No, sir. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: They're two different designations. MR. MUDD: No, sir. All I did on that sheet was have Harry concentrate on Category A. And you do have some park and rec stuff in there on the Category A business ten -year plan. MR. PIRES: Mr. Mudd, if I may, the mission statement, then, are those the guidelines in the ordinance, or are they the guidelines adopted for the board for the TDC? Only because in the grant app -- applications 1 see the phrase about whether or not -- whether the proposed expenditure furthers the objectives outlined in the mission statement. I'm just trying to get an understanding of what the mission statement is. MR. MUDD: The mission statement for this committee? MR. PIRES: Or just the commission statement. That phrase Page 25 j46J& is used in all the grant applications that we have in our packet. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. It would be -- it would be to -- the mission statement of the TDC based on the categories -- MR. PIRES: Okay. MR. MUDD: -- and what it would be used for, not necessarily the mission statement for the particular committee that came up with those recommendations. And as -- as my -- my finance director just came up to me, he says that Category D, the pier, the money's there; the $2007000 is there, but it doesn't necessarily get used every year. Okay. So it's up to the committee to -- you know, you've just -- we've just done a major renovation. For instance -- let's take an example. You just done a major renovation to the Naples pier last year. You did -- we did something to it, okay, replaced the planks or whatever. And it looks like it's going to be good for a three -year period of time, and we don't foresee a problem. You've got 200 K there and you decided that you wanted to put a fishing pier in Marco Island someplace; you could use those dollars in order to start that project, may it be a design or site -- a site survey or the permit process in order to get ready to -- to do that, and the pier could be -- could be done in stages. Okay, you could put on one section, and then you could extend it out a little bit farther the next year or whatever. But it's there, and it doesn't get used every year and hasn't been used every year. And 1 think that most people that have some -- some experience with the committee, in the past we have not been very successful in spending all our program, okay. And that -- and -- and I think that's a pretty true statement. And 1 think it would be a real -- my -- my opinion it would be a real success story if we put projects out on the agenda that were doable and we got the TDC to allocate those dollars and then executed that program instead of letting those dollars and projects just kind of slip away Page 26 J ule641 and then all of a sudden somebody has a good idea and -- and they move those monies from its intended purpose. So 1 will tell you, in the past we haven't been successful in expending the dollars that have been allocated in order to get the beach done, and 1 don't think it was because of a lack of projects. MR. GRAY: As - -"as we are looking at the proposals for this coming fiscal year, all of these projects have come from TDC. Does that mean that projects will always come from TDC, or can this committee bring forth projects of their own? MR. MUDD: No, sir. Those -- those projects all came from the staff and were submitted to the TDC. The way -- the way 1 look at your mission statement, your charter, this committee devises the projects that need to be done for the beach and the areas around the beach in order to maintain it as a quality -- as a -- as a quality site for tourists. We go out -- once you -- once the committee comes to consensus on it's a good project, then they need more detail; then we'll go out there and get an AE firm to look at it, do site surveys, get all those things that need to be done, and come back with estimates. In that process I would say to the committee, 1 wouldn't worry that much about the dollars, okay. I really wouldn't. I'd really worry about the projects. And we'll put them together. And we'll make them fit. Okay. As far as the budget is concerned, I think we have enough leeway -- and we'll talk about the ten -year program you asked me about before, Mr. Chairman, where the latitude is in that, and we'll talk about specifically where it is. And once those projects are there and we start laying those out as far -- in a prioritized manner and we can lay them out over a ten -year program or whenever it needs to be, or if we want to go out farther than that, we can -- or you can, and we'll lay those out, and we'll start notching them down. And if somebody Page 27 J46J4 doesn't spend their dollars in their program, then we have a -- 1 call it a UFR, an unfinanced requirement, but it's our next priority down from the cut line, and we have the dollars based in the TD fund -- TDC funds to -- to bring it up forward, we can -- you as a committee can -- can go to the TDC and say, "Hey, we'd like to -- we'd like to bring that up on the line instead of doing it next year," and that project that you have as a slippage, you can move out in its place, and you can get your project done a little bit earlier. We can do the savings and slippage, too, with them, and we haven't done that in the past. At least 1 haven't seen it done in the past. MR. GRAY: So the projects can basically then come from most anywhere but probably would be funneled through staff and then to TDC and then to us. MR. MUDD: No, sir. MR. GRAY: Or to the Board of County - Commissioners. MR. MUDD: it would be -- it could be funneled from the staff or to you, and you can bring them up in this committee section, or we'll bring them up to you. If -- if the TDC comes up with an idea for a project, my recommend -- and the Board of County Commissioners, my recommendation is that they talk to the chairman or the vice - chairman or one of the members on the Coastal Advisory Committee and get that project going through the proper process. 1 think some people have been frustrated in the Beach Renourishment Council meetings that 1 saw -- 1 heard one time -- 1 heard a couple times when 1 went to the meetings where they said, "Well, it doesn't make a difference what we recommend because they're going to outvote us." and 1 -- 1 think they got the committees out of whack. if you think of the Coastal Advisory Committee as the -- as the committee that has the ideas for the projects, they submit them to the TDC for the dollars, and then Page 28 iul6JI those two things tie together, and they go to the Board of County Commissioners for an approval. 1 think if they go that way like they're supposed to in the manner 1 just described, you won't be frustrated because you get overvoted because everybody knows if you have an idea for a project, it goes to this forum and you don't get circumvented at the TDC or the BCC. And -- and 1 will fry, when it -- if somebody comes up on the di -- I've only heard it one time on the dais of the Board of County Commissioners, and 1 talked to the commissioner afterwards and asked if they would be so kind to put that down in the proper process so that it could be -- it could be diagnosed -- the problem could be diagnosed and a solution could be formed and, therefore, put in -- in the proper perspective as far as the projects are concerned. So from my side, as the public utilities administrator, 1 will try to make sure that the ideas for projects always come -- come back to this committee and that they don't get formed someplace else. They get formed here; they get examined here, scrutinized here, and formed; and they're part of the overall program. And so it just isn't a good idea that bounced around a little bit and then showed up on a thing and then you're stuck with it, but it really doesn't fit in, but it -- but it might have served a particular interest. MR. ROELLIG: Well, just as a matter of history for some of the new board members, what happened this year was an anomaly because most of these projects didn't come before the old advisory committee. And then the TDC met, and they approved them subject to the approval of -- of the new committee, this -- the sitting committee. Normally these projects would have been approved that we're looking today, let's say, in the April time frame. And 1 assume that's what will happen next year. Next April, somewhere around there, it will come before Page 29 j46J4 this committee, and then the TDC will meet in May or whatever, and it will go up the normal progression, but this year is sort of anomaly as far as how it's -- the TDC approved it subject to the approval of this committee. But normally it would be the other way around, as I understand it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: When you talked earlier about not effectively spending all the funds available in years past, even our ten -year spreadsheet here shows substantial carry forwards. And am 1 -- am 1 mixing apples and oranges or -- MR. MUDD: No, 1 think what -- as you lay out your ten -year plan, you -- you've got a -- I'm looking for my ten -year plan. MR. ANDERSON: This is the new one, the newer version. MR. MUDD: As carry you carry out your ten -year plan, and 1'd really ask you to focus on the projects. To the top where it says "revenues, alternative 1," ignore that because that's the old TDC ordinance. I'd ask you to focus on "revenues, alternative 21" which is that shaded area. Sir, you're absolutely right. You do have carry forward in in the -- on the programs. But if you take a look at the carry forward down in Alternative 21 what'll happen is you'll have a rather large event, in particular 2006 and 2007. And, oh, by the way, this is the best the staff could do at the time. You'll notice that there's a $6.1 million program in -- if you look at Section B -2 -A where it says construction, Collier County, City of Naples, $6,100 (sic), that's the next major hydraulic dredge renourishment of the beach. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yeah. And -- and as you said last time, it's fiscal year 107. We get down to half a million when we're projecting out like that, that is, you know, for planning purposes, more or less zero. But then I guess after that it builds up significantly again. So -- a lot of it is -- maybe all of it is cash flow management, 1 guess, waiting for the big projects -- Page 30 ,U4 6X1 MR. MUDD: No, not necessarily. You were asking before about where's our flexibility. And 1 -- and I think you'll see after that big event -- oh, and by the way, we also talked about the Corps of Engineers and the ability to cost share with federal partners. If we're able to -- to get a coastal renourishment project approved and cost shared through that -- it's normally a two -year study process; we got time to do it -- if 1 can have them belly up to the bar with 65 percent of that, okay, you're talking about a $4 million influx of dollars from the federal government against our 2 million, our 35 percent cost share. And oh, by the way, you now have $4 million worth of flexibility in your budget to bring in projects. And -- and you were asking about where that leeway was, and that carry forward is one place; that's in another. Those dollars are allocated, and it -- and it behooves this committee to have a list of potential projects lined up so -that they're there. They're based on a year's budget. If one slips because of a permit issue, then you can slip one in that you had a permit for. You can -- you can move that one to the next FY. The permit comes in; you can add it to that budget. If you have a couple that are below the line that we're looking for that federal cost -share money or grant money that costs in order to bring them above the cut line, it shows up, we're now in business for those projects. So you're going to have to have those permits there, the plans done, the design ready to go. And then, oh, by the way, we have enough folks on standby on -- independent -- excuse me, IDIQ, indefinite quantity type quantit -- or contracts so that you can get them done. One of the things I've asked the PMs to do is to -- in -- in the upland sand issue, to -- to find at least three vendors that have the right quality -type sand so we don't get into this dilemma that we just went through with the -- with the sand we put on the Page 31 J46J4 beach this last time. We have the sand samples all approved by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. We've learned by our mistakes a little bit. Make sure that they're sampled. The vendors are there. We give them a minimum quantity that we want from them in any given year, and we also give them a maximum that we could want from them, have that truck contract set for multiple years, that hauling contract. And then when our windows, our 45 -day windows in the spring and the fall, come upon us, we engage. We don't go through a panic in order to get the sand and then another panic to get the truck company bonded like we did this time. 1 mean, there was some real panic. 1 said, "Wait a minute. We got a contract with somebody that isn't bonded ?" well, they got a letter coming. I'm going, "Oh, you got to be kidding me." And as the time's ticking away, our -- it's -- we're in our 45 days, and now we've got 29 days to execute. And then we -- we're jumping through hoops. That's not the right way to do business. We know when those times are. We should be ready. We've got 270 other days in a year we can get ready to go do this. Let's get ready to go do this and make sure that when the -- when the gun sounds we're out of the box and we're running and we're executing. And that's been one of problems in the past. We haven't thought -- the staff hasn't thought far enough ahead -- and I -- I'll say staff in this particular case, but when you only have one person on it, you've got a lot of things going on, and that's why we've added another PM in that process so that we can have more eyes on -- on the different projects, and at the same time we can get ahead of the ballgame a little bit as far as projects, permits, and -- and the paper requirements from -- from all the different bureaucracies that have to touch it before we can execute and to get that ready to go in order to do it. Page 32 J46J$ So in the past we haven't been able to spend it for one reason or another. We'd like to get ourselves in a very proactive manner in the future so that if you have it on the agenda and it's on for that year's budget, we're going to execute it to the best of our ability. Now, there's always some event that happens, the sea turtles come in early or something -- 1 don't know -- you get invaded by sea turtles, and it has to stop the project. Okay, you have to postpone it maybe into the next FY, into the next fall. But there's ways to do that, and there's projects that you can bring on instead and still execute your program that you have envisioned for the county, and it's a multiple -year program. It's not necessarily what's tomorrow and what are we doing today. But you got out there, and you've got some flexibility within your own committee. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MR. MUDD: And I -- 1 think at -- at this juncture we need to talk about the budget overview in the -- in the work plan. One of the -- the key ingredients of this forum this time was to get the tenures down and to get the work plan approved or not approved or modified or whatever so that we could get to the TDC on the 25th of June before the summer recess so that we didn't miss the budget window. And, again, the TDC has said, "It's tentatively approved based on your approval." so if you don't like it or you don't want it or you don't vote for it, it's not there. And so that's -- it isn't a foregone conclusion is what I'm trying to say. MR. PIRES: Mr. Chairman, if I may, just for discussion before we get into the presentation, our law firm in the past has performed legal services for Brett Moore individually. And we're not retained by them at the present time, and I just wanted to make sure -- I talked to David Weigel briefly about that. One of our associates who used to be in our firm did do some other legal Page 33 J.4641 work for some individuals. And I'm not sure if they are under contract with the county and that their contracts are contingent upon any of the funding sources here. Just a quick reading of the statute, 1 don't believe 1 have a conflict, but I wanted to make that known to the committee and to the staff. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MR. ANDERSON: 'Yes. We'd like to make a little presentation on the recommended projects for the FY '02. Once again, I'm Roy Anderson, director of engineering for the public utilities division. Basically, we have -- we've based the projects that we've contained in here on the submittal that was made by Harry Huber -- well, by our department -- to the TDC. There have been some minor changes here and there which I'll explain as we go through, but it's mostly because this process occurred at the same time our administrative budget process was going on where we were, you know, projecting what we needed to spend for next year, so there has been some upward and downward refinement. If you will open your package to the first page, that's where the list of projects starts. And what I've also done is to insert some photographic references in the back which -- where -- you know, in cases where we had pictorials, you know, to illustrate what we're talking about or, you know, we -- or if we had them available or if they fit, we -- we enclosed them to -- to help with your understanding of the project. The first project is project management fees, and that's really the heart of our operation. It's this -- this element has a total cost of $2809200, and it's comprised of three staff positions which -- who run the program: Harry Huber, who is the project leader, and a Project Manager 1 /11 and a field inspector, Al Madsen, who is our full -time field inspector. And basically this is Page 34 J.16Jo1 the group that puts all this documentation together, coordinates with all the consulting engineers, supervises the contractors, and applies for any grants, whatever, takes care of public information requests. So this is our core function. And previously when we made the original submission, the amount was $21393009 and now we're at 280,000. And there are two primary reasons for that. One is just simply because we went into a more detailed budget presentation -- or preparation for the whole county for our entire budget. So there were some refinements. And, secondly, there was a -- a increase infringe benefit, you know, in medical insurance and those kind of things which -- which caused the price to -- to go up. So that's -- but that's where we are, and that's -- that's what's reflected in our approved -- well, our -- our budget submittal to the county is 280,000. Would you -- would you like to discuss each item individually, or did you just want me just to run through everything and hold the questions to the end, Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, we -- we -- I'd welcome questions from anyone, of course, but we discussed many of the items in -- in some detail last time. So what 1 would suggest is running through them very quickly -- MR. ANDERSON: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- or -- or even just pausing at each one to see if we have any further questions from the committee. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But we did do a lot of that last time. MR. GRAY: 1 have just one question. That difference between the two thirteen and the two eighty, the app, grant application that came through, is that going to be changed? Page 35 i.laG31 MR. ANDERSON: Yes, it will. Yes, yes. That will be updated after this meeting. That is correct. Number two -- MR. ROELLIG: Are we going to approve each one as we go along, make a motion to approve this? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: What I thought, we would go through and discuss the work plan. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And then take a motion to approve. And if there's something that someone objects to, I'm sure we can take a motion to approve except for this project or that project. MR. ANDERSON: The next project is the Wiggins Pass inlet, and this is a project to do engineering and construction for dredging in Wiggins Pass, $472,000. MR. MUDD: Did you bring a -- did you bring one of those inlet pass management -- MR. ANDERSON: Yes, 1 did. 1 brought a sample for Caxambas Pass. MR. MUDD: Caxambas Pass. We asked last time what the management plan looked like. We just bring it by. We didn't bring stacks of them. They're pretty thorough when you -- when you get into when you need to dredge and how you do the inlet management so ... MR. PIRES: If I may, the professional services that would be needed for this, have they already been -- the design engineers or engineers already been selected, or is that subject to an RFP down the road? MR. MUDD: That's -- that's subject to an RFP down the road. We -- the county let Coastal leave, okay, and let them go, and that's been in the paper here lately too. And I won't go back over that. And Humiston we're using right now. We need to submit back out for an IDIO for an AE firm or two AE firms multiple years Page 36 j46JI that will serve as -- as our architect engineering firms to help us as we start examining projects and laying out that design. So we're going to send out a RFP and probably select two firms to help us in that process. But right now we're using Humiston because they do have some subject matter expertise in their firm as far as coastal engineering is concerned. MR. PIRES: And so with the new FY 2001 -2002, it will be a new -- MR. MUDD: We're going to put out -- we're going to put out new -- I'm sorry. MR. PIRES: Okay. MR. MUDD: We're going to put out new contracts this -- this summer and get those awarded before the new fiscal year starts. MR. ANDERSON: The next item is sea turtle monitoring. This is a program we discussed earlier. Maura Kraus, who was here at the last meeting, is head of that program, $134,400. For incremental beach maint -- MR. ROELLIG: 1 have a question on that. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. MR. ROELLIG: It talks about giving a grant to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service out of some of this money. 1'd like -- you know, it's just a little unusual to me for the county providing grant money to the federal government. 1 don't know where I picked that up. MS. LUPO: The second -to- the -last page. MR. ANDERSON: What are you referring to, Mr. Roellig? MS. LUPO: It says under the question, "Does the proposed expenditure promote environmental awareness ?" my understanding -- Does the proposed project address environmental considerations ?" and it says yes. And then the last sentence, "A separate grant to the USFWS will hopefully fund this aspect of the program. ". Page 37 ,Ulbid MR. ROELLIG: This is on -- that's -- well, it's just a bullet. MR. MUDD: 1 will -- 1 will -- 1 will find out real quick, and we'll make a phone call. But 1 think that's a grant from, not a grant to. agree with -- 1 agree with you, sir. We don't normally give grants to federal agencies. MR. ROELLIG: No. It's not unheard of, but it's a little unusual. That's my comment. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: One thing, as we go through these -- I raised this last week. If you could note with some of these -- we don't have to have exact dollar figures, but if you could note items which are -- are really continuing programs that we do annually. For example, 1 assume sea turtle monitoring would fall into that -- MR. ANDERSON: Yes. Yeah, uh -huh. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- in that -- you know, that is just a normal progression in costs. It's not a -- an unusual or -- or intermittent project, or there's not a huge change in activity. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. That's certainly the case with 3, the sea turtle monitoring. And it's the case with 41 the incremental beach maintenance. That's the -- that's the placement of the 50,000, roughly, cubic yards of sand per year. MR. MUDD: Now, that -- that hadn't been done for five years and was done this year, should have been done every year. We've got some catching up to do, as far as that's concerned. And as the years progress, we're adding 5 cubic yards. And then when you get around 2006 in the 10 -year plan, when we get there, we'll talk about it. We start doubling it, and we get into quantities of a hundred thousand cubic yards, putting them on the beach. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And the -- the surveying or whatever you might call it to find exactly where the sand will be Page 38 J46JI placed, that's not been done yet, has it, the locations that will be MR. MUDD: It has. There's several places that we have active permits for in order to -- to do the beach renourishment. But 1'd ask the committee as they go out and talk to their constituents and people start funneling ideas or areas that need to be refurbished, that you bring them to us so that we can get out on the permit side of the house, find out if the permit is active or if we have to go on out there and get one. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Does it typically work in a reactive mode like that where -- where somebody from the public has to say, "My beach isn't any good anymore" or -- or is there an engineer or surveyor or something that -- that traverses the coast annually ? MR. ANDERSON: Yeah. Our inspector does traverse the area, so he's got a good -- a regular update- on the conditions. And 1 might add that that -- that's a good point that these conditions are subject to change very rapid -- very rapidly with storm events so that our priority list today may -- may need to change tomorrow, but we would bring that information back to -- to you and -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So we'll take public's -- as we always should, we'll take public comment, but also we actively go out and -- and monitor. MR. ANDERSON: Exactly. Yes, sir. MR. ROELLIG: As a -- as a backup, the past meetings always -- either a weekly or a biweekly inspection of all of the beaches here -- Mr. Madsen -- and so at every meeting we got an update on any hot spots or critical erosion areas that were coming up. So we were always informed of that at every meeting as a matter of history. MR. MUDD: We still have that. Page 39 JU46X1 MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. MUDD: The worst thing is Harry's in the hospital and AI's on leave, so I'm at a little bit of a -- but -- but I've seen Al -- I've seen AI's logs, and he -- he does on a daily basis go out and inspect and bring those logs back, take pictures and those kind of things. For instance, thisuyear we put 41,000 cubic yards during the month of April out on the beach. We kept 9,000 cubic yards as a standby to see how the hurricane season goes. And if there is a hot spot that we can get to it in October with sand that's available and has already been produced and we still have some - - some -- some truck money with the firm that we have that we finally got them to be bonded in order to do that in the April time frame. MR. GRAY: Also, pricing this at $20 a cubic yard, then that's assuming that our -- our source will be an inland source, as we used this past year? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. This is -- this is -- this is specifically laid on as an in -- as an upland source for sand. And we do it on a -- on a yearly basis. And in about every five years, we do a very large hydraulic renourishment effort. The last large hydraulic effort that transpired had rocks on the beach, and -- and we -- 1 think we all know about the consequences of that problem. MR. GRAY: And 1 guess it could be that as we go forward, we might want to always use an upland source, as long as there is supply there -- MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. GRAY: -- rather than go back to the gulf. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. One of the things that -- that 1 had a conversation with -- with a person that we're going to hire, okay, for -- for -- for beach -- we're going to move Harry to a -- to a different job and transition another gentleman into the PM -3 Page 40 J4611 position, and we're out there looking for a hire right now, and I've got a contingent hire on that person. He's an Annapolis graduate, 20 years dredging coastland design, that process, all kinds of training structures, pretty -- has the requirements for the job. But as 1 was talking to him, in the dredging event, you know, he basically said, "Well, what happens if 1 have the dredging event and -- and we've basically done our job but we still have time and equipment and there's money out there, and it takes time to mobilize a dredge ?" 1 said, "You're absolutely right." and he says, "Is there anything wrong with finding a storage site for the material so that you could use it in follow -on years in order to -- to put that sand out there ?" 1 said, "Absolutely not." and he -- he said, "Is there anybody that says you can't do that ?" and 1 said, "Well, 1 don't think 1 want to put it next to the Ritz - Carlton." but we can find those places, and it's that kind of initiative that we need in the program to do those kind of things. But we're concentrating in making sure that we have an upland source of sand every year if we need it in those -- in those indefinite delivery and definite quantity -type contracts there so that it's there if we have to have it, and -- and we've got that sand to put out there. And you're right; you need to have it. You need to have that source there readily available, and you need to be able to execute on it -- MR. GRAY: Quick. MR. MUDD: -- quick. And you've got that -- again, you've got that 45 -day and -- 45 -day window that you've got to work. MR. ANDERSON: The next item, No. 5, is beach - cleaning operations, and that's a slight -- that's a downward adjustment. Originally we had 241,500, and based on updated projections, it's 206,400, and that's a continuing program. No. 6 is beach - cleaning equipment, and this varies a little bit Page 41 J.k6J4 from year to year. Last year we bought a lot of equipment. This year this -- for this proposed fiscal year we just proposed to replace one beach rake for $42,000 so that the total for that is forty -six five. And, again, that's a recurring -- MR. ROELLIG: 1 have a question on that. MR. ANDERSON: Yes, sir. MR. ROELLIG: The previous one you have parts and maintenance for forty -six five. 1 presume it's just coincidental they're both the same amount . MR. ANDERSON: It's -- they're just termed different. They're -- it's the same amount. It's the same item. It's the same item. MR. ROELLIG: Well -- no. The -- this -- the item you're talking about now, the forty -six five, is not included in the -- what was it - - two oh six, is it? MR. ANDERSON: That is -- that is over the two oh six. MR. ROELLIG: What I'm saying, in the -- in the previous number, two ten, there was item for parts and maintenance for forty -six five. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: There's a line -- there's a line item for beach - cleaning operations. Looking at the application, there's a line item for parts and maintenance -- MR. ROELLIG: 1 just want to make sure we're not double counting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- which is forty -six five. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. The beach -- yeah. The breakdown that I have here is Item A -6, beach - cleaning equipment, was in the original application. That's forty -six five and -- MR. ROELLIG: The prior one, the beach - cleaning operation, we have -- Item No. 2, parts and maintenance, also is coincidentally two -- forty -six five . CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: In essence, 1 think the question is, is it a coincidence that it's the same number, or is it a double Page 42 Jul 6J4 count? MR. MUDD: Sir, I'm going to have to find that out. MR. ROELLIG: No problem. MR. GRAY: While we're talking about that, you said in Item 5 that we're going to two ten five? The app that we had from the last time we met said two oh six four? I'm sorry. The last time it said two ten five, and now it says two oh six four. MR. MUDD: Yeah. You started it and said it -- he's come -- we've come down off that number a little bit as we sharpened our pencil. MR. GRAY: Okay. I thought he said that -- okay. I'm with you. MR. ANDERSON: The next item, No. 7, beach and inlet maintenance, is -- is a continuing project, and we propose $195,000 for that. And that's exactly as it was in the original application. Number 8, annual monitoring, likewise, that's the same as it was previously. And 1 have a photo exhibit for that, 471,800. MR. ROELLIG: Excuse me again. Item 7, on the first item, dune maintenance, you have 2 1/2 acres at $5,000 an acre. Is that -- I'm not nickel- diming you here, but I'm just kind of curious what -- what that was -- MR. MUDD: What he basically does on those dunes? MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. MUDD: From what I can get from Harry when 1 talked about dune maintenance with him, they go out in those particular areas where there's erosions from the dunes, and they start planting sea grasses and things like that that -- that -- that go through that process in order to hold them in place. And that's basically an estimate of what -- what's -- what it's cost us in a particular area in the past. So he puts it down in the budget, says, "Hey, it -- we normally do about 5 acres a year," and -- and Page 43 146k4 that's how the budget part came about. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. MR. MUDD: But it's a continuing effort to make sure that they're planted. Once you've got dunes, you want to keep them. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. MUDD: And -- and so you got to stay on top of the -- that process because as things die, you got to replant them to keep it there so ... MR. ROELLIG: So this has a lot of unit -- items on it. This could fluctuate -- MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. ROELLIG: -- year to year. MR. MUDD: You could -- you could go out there and say, "Hey, I don't -- 1 only had to do an acre this year." okay. And those dollars would -- those dollars would move forward. And that's -- that's the particular issue I was getting with you earlier. Yes, you have a plan; you have the budget. It could change based on whether it could be a really good year where you don't have to maintain as much and then you've got those extra dollars. That -- that's why it behooves the committee to have several projects on -- on -- below the line but prioritized that could slip in when those dollars are there in order -- in order to get those projects funded because your next year could be a very bad year. You could have -- 1 can't find any wood, but you could have a severe -- an event, and it would cause you to put a lot of extra dollars into -- into projects that you didn't have before. So maybe some projects would have to not get done in that particular year. So you've got some room, and we need to make sure that we -- we're agile enough in that -- in that program in order to get and have that room and have those projects identified. And 1 would say in this budget submission they're not there. Page 44 J46J4 I asked -- I asked Harry as he was drawing it up, 1 said, "Harry, do me a favor." i said, "Show me what the budget's going to look like based on stuff that we've habitually done." I don't see anything new except Hideaway Beach, that -- that one area that's in there as far as the boardwalk or beach renourishment is the two options that we talked about last time that really jumped out of the page at me. And that's because they were previously submitted to several committees. MR. ANDERSON: The next item is annual monitoring. And in general this involves field measurements for recording and preparation of reports that describe the -- the impact -- that refer to the impact of the projects that we do and to create background information. So these are the proposed locations, and the amount is 47 -- $471,800. MR. GRAY: Question on that: Does, in fact, it cost a half million dollars to do this kind of work? Historically is that what it's cost? MR. ANDERSON: Yes. For this magnitude of work. Yes. There's a lot of mobilization, field work, putting of sophisticated instrumentation there for continuous recording of -- of -- of water levels and cross - sectional areas to see the change in the bottom contours that occur so that there's a tremendous amount of field work. And it's done by consulting engineers . MR. GRAY: These -- these are through the engineer -- MR. ANDERSON: Yes. MR. GRAY: -- like Humiston Moore or -- MR. ANDERSON: That is correct. MR. GRAY: Also -- MR. MUDD: And, sir, you might have a -- and during this -- you know, this is -- this is a best guess of where it is right now. 1 mean, the contract hasn't been cut for any of this yet, so it you -- it could come under. And -- and habitually in -- in the past if, for Page 45 JU16JI instance, you got this monitoring group and it's such and such a dollar and you decide that you need a project in this particular area that falls in that thing, that that -- that examination by the AE firm for that project to lay that out would be part of the dollars that were in there. So it does a little bit more. You'll notice in the budget there's no place that says, well, this is for AE firms, okay, to go -out there and -- and examine your particular areas. It basically happens in that annual monitoring budget. MR. PIRES: And with these, once again, as you indicated, you're asking for RFPs or requests for proposals for the various firms; are they annual contracts or multiyear contracts? because, as Mr. Anderson indicated, that it entails mobilizing, you know, various equipment and monitoring devices at times. Are they out there continuously or just on an intermittent basis? MR. MUDD: No. The -- for instance, the Coastal Engineering contract was a multiple -year contract, and I can't tell you how far it went back, but it --it was a fairly lengthy process. 1 mean, see Mr. Pollack -- Pollack's (phonetic) going all the way back to `95, okay, as you went through the "beaches through the rocks case." and -- so that was a lengthy con -- what I'd like to do is get at least two contracts and have them so that they're offset so that they don't give up both of them in -- in the third year. You have one for three years; you have another for two, and then you can start offsetting them so that you don't lose all your expertise or your institutional knowledge in the -- in the contract process. And you don't have all your eggs in one basket. And 1 think we need to do that to be a little bit more successful. And if -- and if we -- if you as a committee look at a report that -- that one of those engineering firms provides to you or the staff provides you and you -- and it doesn't pass the common -sense test -- okay, you -- engineers are supposed to use Page 46 ,u1bb1 that -- and it doesn't -- and it doesn't make it, you have another firm that can go out and take a look and do an independent technical review for you, and we haven't had that in the past. And 1 think it -- it -- it would be smart business process for us to have that so that you can -- you can get two opinions if you need it. It isn't a simple project, and it looks a little complicated. It just -- something just isn't right, doesn't smell right, doesn't feel good in your gut; you can go out there and get a second opinion. MR. GRAY: 1 have another question on 8. 1 think this is a safe assumption, but 1 have to ask. The Item 1, the 244,200 for Collier County beach restoration, that's including Naples, City of Naples, and Collier County, other than Marco Island -- MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. GRAY: -- basically. Okay. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. GRAY: 1 just want to make sure Naples is taken care of. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. 1 don't think Dr. Staiger would let me get away with that. MR. ANDERSON: The next item is Hideaway Beach renourishment, a project to renourish Hi -- Hideaway Beach on Marco Island. This is the permits, the engineering design, meetings, sand, survey, permits, and permit fees and -- and -- and other contingencies, about 335,500. And, again, this is as per the original application. MS. LUPO: And that's for the entire area -- from the T -groin at the west end of the fill, that's for the existing beach? That doesn't include the proposed new fill that they've requested? That's under a different item? MR. MUDD: That's right, ma'am. MS. LUPO: And this is just an annual renourishment? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It's annual? Page 47 J U16641 MS. LUPO: Or biannual. MR. MUDD: Well, this isn't -- this isn't -- this is not annual, okay. This is -- this is -- right now Hideaway Beach has got themselves a problem. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Because 1 was going to say -- 1 mean, my understanding is -- I'm going to clearly not be very technical, but what we consider renourishments generally need to be done every five years or so; isn't that correct? MR. MUDD: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I know that conditions can vary along a coastline, but as a general statement -- MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- that would be pretty much on the mark, I hope. MR. MUDD: This is a particular project for Hideaway Beach. In order to -- in order to get them up to -- Hideaway Beach is to the point in time, the beach is going away. And it looks like they're going to run into a bunch of walls if they don't do some -- some -- if we don't take some -- some -- 1 call it drastic action, some immediate action. And this is part of that process in order to get that beach in some kind of shape where it just doesn't disappear on them. This also gets into the T -groin aspect that we're doing right now. We're putting two T- groins -- and we are right now taking dredge material -- 1 talked about those pipes that the turtle got stuck on. We're -- we're trying to renourish right now and get part of that process done along with two additional T- groins put in so that we try to protect that beach. MS. LUPO: Is there public access to that beach right now? MR. MUDD: Yes, there is. But right now you have to wade through water in order to get to it. And if -- if we -- if we get to Item No. 12, that's the access issue we need to talk about a little Page 48 Jul"I bit. MR. KROESCHELL: That's what 1 -- my question is. This assuming that there will be public access to the beach, then, that -- MR. MUDD: Sir, it is a pub -- it is public beach right now. MR. KROESCHELL: It is a public beach. MR. MUDD: Yes,-sir. It's just -- you've got to get through private landowners in order to get there, okay. And that makes it difficult. So the only way that you can get to the beach is through Tigertail or to bring your boat and -- and -- and bring it up to the sand side. But it is a public beach. If it wasn't a public beach, we wouldn't be talking about it right now. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think, also, the question is more - - even if the beach itself is public, you know, is it reasonably easy to -- to get there? MR. MUDD: Right now it's not -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: The answer is no. MR. MUDD: It's not easy to get there, ma'am, unless you're really determined. Now, 1 can get determined with you one day, and we'll go find it, but you -- basically, if you're going to walk, you need to get there from Tigertail Beach, which has parking and things in order to get there, and you have to go north from Tigertail and walk. And if it's low tide, you'll be high and dry. And if it -- if the tide's going up, you're going to get knee deep. MS. LUPO: So if we renourish their beach, we have to get to the beach through adjacent landowners? We can't get through it to Hide -- through Hideaway per se? MR. MUDD: That's right. MS. LUPO: Okay. MR. GRAY: The $130,000 item in here that's labeled as "sand search," is that the actual sand? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. What -- what -- what we do with Page 49 JU46J4 Hideaway, because you can't get to it with a truck, 1 have no way -- we just talked about it. You can't get to it from somebody's backyard or from a side street or whatnot. The only way to get Hidea -- to get Hideaway Beach and get sand to it is to find a sand source out in the water. And once you find it and it's the right - quality sand and you test it, you do the samples, is to hydraulically dredge that sand and put it on the beach. The other way to do it is to bring it in by barge, but that's quite expensive. MR. GRAY: We need -- MR. ROELLIG: 1 thought we brought some sand into Hideaway this -- MR. MUDD: We -- MR. ROELLIG: -- past April. MR. MUDD: We did -- we -- we did a little bit, and I think it was a limited access. We didn't get as much as we would have liked to. But it was about, 1'd say, one - quarter of the total quantity. MR. ROELLIG: You know, prior knowledge, there was about 15,000 yards we were looking to put there earlier this spring. MR. MUDD: 1 think we got about twelve. MR. ROELLIG: Twelve. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You know, 1 think we almost have to talk about 9, which is the renourishment, and 12 together, because I'll be the first to admit, I have not -- I've been to Marco Island. If you told me to meet you at Hideaway Beach, I'd have to ask. I'll get familiar now that I'm serving on -- on this committee. But I know in principle what 1 would object to, and that is, even if it's a public beach, to renourishing it, if the only reasonable access was if you own beachfront property right there. MS. LUPO: Do we have a presentation, or is a presentation going to be made on No. 12? because I don't think that we Page 50 JU11AJ011 actually got to that at the last meeting. I think that was towards the end where we compiled them altogether and said we'd talk about them next time. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And someone -- 1 think that's a very good point. And anyone who is more familiar with Marco than 1 -- 1 -- we need to -- to address the meat of what the access will be and also my query. I don't think we should be -- I'll - I'll hedge it because I -- I also understand that we need to maintain our coastline. But in principle, if we're renourishing a beach that has realistically only private access, even though it's a public beach, 1'd have a problem with that. MR. PIRES: 1 guess, just following up on what you indicated, the Item No. 12, 1 agree with you, tends to go together that when we talk about in the applications, describe how the project enhances county tourist development programs, No. 9 says it will enhance the public access and viability of -the area's major tourist attraction, that seems like that almost goes with No. 12, as opposed to No. 9, whereas No. 12 says the success of this project will ensure appropriate use of public funds, which I'm not sure where that goes. That's a big circle, that if you use money right, then we will be -- so I think -- 1 tend to agree that No. 12 needs to be looked at in conjunction with No. 9, because if that's successful and that works, then we have the beach access. Number 9 by itself doesn't provide that. MR. ROELLIG: I'd like to make a comment on this. And I'm -- 1 want to give a little more history on Hideaway Beach. And 1 don't want to speak for the Marco Island people that are more familiar, but there's two other reasons why this has been funded in the past. One, back in the early '90s when they did a renourishment on -- on Marco Island, this was part of that project, so there is some precedent. That's No. 1. Number 2, my understanding is -- and -- and if we had a Page 51 iu1e6JDJ consultant, they could discuss this -- the dredging of the passes there has led to a condition where the -- the water is flowing out faster during the tidal exchanges and has contributed to the erosion here at Hideaway Beach. So there's a couple of other factors that are -- come to play in this. And 1 just bring this up for your consideration. And one is that, as 1 said, it had been in a previous beach nourishment project; and, two, you might say activities funded by the TDC, in a sense, dredging of those passes, seems to increase the -- the speed of the flow which is a cause of increased erosion there. It's not a -- quite a black -and- white situation. And -- and 1 don't want to put words in the Marco Island people's face -- mouth, but that's basically been my somewhat comfort level with -- with doing Hideaway. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And that's why I'd like to understand it a little bit more because that's what I was trying to say by just saying, you know, I wanted to hedge myself a little bit because there can be other coastal or environmental reasons. But I think it's -- I think it's a hurdle to climb if -- if we're talking about a beach that doesn't in -- in a common -sense fashion doesn't have public access. MR. MUDD: One of the -- one of the problems with the Hideaway Beach has been the public access. And if -- and I don't think this is too far of -- astray, but 1 -- if it would be all right with the -- with the chairman, I'd like Mr. Anderson to talk about that a little bit, if -- because he has more knowledge into this particular issue than 1 do, okay, and he -- and everything I do know about it he's given to me either in a paper or in conversations or -- or whatever. Would that be -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'd be happy to do. Mr. Anderson, are you appearing as a citizen or in an advocacy role or -- or what? MR. ANDERSON: Mr. Chairman, my name is Bruce Anderson. Page 52 JUL-614 I'm here as the attorney for the Hideaway Beach Association. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. ANDERSON: We have here in the audience a member of the Hideaway Beach Association board and the general manager of the Hideaway Beach Association. As the former chairman of the beach renourishment committee was just sharing with you, there is a long history to the renourishment efforts out on Marco Island and at Hideaway Beach. And just by way of some -- 1 need to get some legal background on -- to share with you. In 1996 there was an appeal that went all the way to the Florida Supreme Court about the legality of using tourist development funds on Marco Island, including Hideaway Beach. And the Florida Supreme Court upheld the use of TDC funds on Marco Island for renourishment efforts. This past January, January 9th, 2001, the county commission made a finding that the use of TDC funds for renourishment and erosion control in the context of the T- groins at Hideaway Beach serves a public purpose. And it was at that meeting that they also directed that the staff come back to them with a plan to enhance the existing public access at Hideaway Beach from Tigertail Beach Park to Hideaway Beach. That plan is before you as Item No. 12 on your agenda. That plan is based on a feasibility report that Hideaway Beach provided at its cost to Collier County in order to enhance the public access. put up here an aerial photograph from 1973 that shows the beach as it existed at that time. And, as you can see, one could walk all the way from Hideaway -- or from Tigertail down here (indicating) along a nice sandy beach to get all the way around Hideaway. Through no fault of Hideaway Beach, this area (indicating) has eroded. So people do need to get their feet wet when they go to the beach if they want to go from Tigertail to Hideaway. Page 53 r , The proposal is, with Item No. 12, to either replenish this beach with sand or to construct a boardwalk. Certainly the preference of the Hideaway Beach Association is to have the sand replaced. However, we -- we understand that that may or may not be technically feasible to eventually do that, and that's why you have Item No. 8 on there to explore those two alternatives. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Also -- and I'm just being very forthright about my lack of background at this stage. This is our first real meeting. But those of you who know me know I'll get up to speed. Is the Hideaway Beach Association a property owners' association, and is -- are those -- is that development reflected on that map, or did that come after? MR. ANDERSON: That came after. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So could you just point out from -- from our benefit, where it is? MR. ANDERSON: The Hideaway Beach property begins about here (indicating) and wraps all the way around on up. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So it begins at Tigertail, then wraps into Hideaway? MR. ANDERSON: Yes. Yes, in fact. A portion of Hideaway Beach -- sand of Hidea -- the sand meets from Tigertail to Hideaway. It's just that a portion of Hideaway has eroded away now. But you can still walk directly from Tigertail to -- to -- to sand in front of Hideaway Beach. You just can't get all the way around without getting your feet wet at the beach. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And the property on that map behind -- behind where the Hideaway property owners currently are -- not that, but on -- on that old map it -- it appears to just be undeveloped land, you know, east of Hideaway Beach. What is that now? Is this -- as you indicated is about 25 -year old -- MR. ANDERSON: Yes. This is all developed. I mean, it's a Page 54 JUL6J& preserve area. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: 1 would assume -- I had assumed so, but 1 just wanted to be sure because, as 1 said, I'm not, frankly, that familiar with Marco Island. MR. ANDERSON: There are a number of preserve areas within Hideaway Beach. So 1 don't want you to be misled that this is all populated now. 1 mean, there are preserve areas. MR. GRAY: That -- that is the only public access into Hideaway Beach would be from Tigertail Beach. 1 think that's been stated before. And this would -- this would be, I think, similar to what we have in the county with Pelican Bay beach. There's no public access to Pelican Bay beach except from an upper or a lower beach through Pelican Bay itself. You cannot get to Pelican Bay beach. It's a similar situation to that. MR. PIRES: If 1 may ask a few questions, again, I'm -- trying to get up to speed just on this particular issue. I'm not sure if it's for Mr. Anderson or for some of the staff. 1 guess to date the materials that we have, which were handed out with the last package, were talking back and forth between Items 9 and 12. Number 12 is a boardwalk alternative plan, and Number 9 is a beach erosion control. Were those paid for by TDC funds or by the Hideaway Beach property owners? The initial sort of analysis -- MR. ANDERSON: Oh, this? This -- this report was paid for by the Hideaway Beach Association. MR. PIRES: The materials that we have here -- MR. ANDERSON: Yes. MR. PIRES: -- the analysis was paid for? What existing beach access exists for the residents within Hideaway beach now? They -- do they have a beach facility? MR. ANDERSON: Yes. They have a -- a clubhouse. MR. PIRES: And from the standpoint of sequentially con -- Page 55 ,Ul6dA the permitability of the beach access plan under No. 12, is that something that the staff feels is very permitable with a boardwalk to extend from Tigertail, the boardwalk pedestrian system, to go from Tiger -- Tigertail to Hideaway? 1 guess what I'm getting at is the old cart before the horse. If there's enhanced public access by virtue of the Project No. 12, that creates the access to get to Hideaway. Then it makes it much easier to say we have a continuous beach all the way around and then to then look at No. 9 and say, yes, that works well. MR. MUDD: If -- if there's a sand source that's close enough, okay, to do the beach renourishment, it would behoove us to probably do the beach renourishment instead of the boardwalk. The reason for it, at least in the plan that I see, the boardwalk is 4 foot wide. You got to have places where you can get off the boardwalk. And God help me if I go out there and have a heart attack. Okay. You got to get to them somehow to extract and do some other things. And I'm not saying we don't have helicopters to do those kind of things, but you've got to think through that process a little bit. It is a -- it is a feasible alternative. And one of the reasons that they put the boardwalk there is because the sand source is important. You have to find it in order to get it. And if you have to -- if the quantity of sand is -- is such and there isn't a good source for it, that $130,000 worth of search and define, if I can't find it in quantities enough and you have to barge it in, then it gets expensive. If I have to truck it in, it gets more expensive. So part of it is that -- that benefit cost ratio you -- you have to do as you do that project. They provided two alternatives. It doesn't mean there isn't a third or a fourth, and it doesn't mean that when we get into it as a committee as this summer rolls on that we couldn't find different alternatives that are there. Page 56 i46J& MR. PIRES: Is -- is it possible that for a recommendation of the committee to be that -- just without forecasting what the committee's recommendations might be that No. 12 be recommended for funding and also a contingent recommendation for No. 9 dependent upon the permitting ability or the ability to get the necessary permits and engage in the activity outlined in No. 12? Does that pose difficulties for you? MR. MUDD: 1 think -- I think they're two separate things. Okay? And 1 think you still -- I think you still want to renourish Hideaway Beach. I don't think you want that beach to get any worse. And -- but I do think we need to think about how the access needs to transpire in order to get there too. And it would be a shame if we had one that was contingent on the access and we had a permit issue that held it up for two years and then the beach just eroded even further than it is today. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Why don't ---is it fair to -- to change words? And we're -- we're raising some questions, and they -- at least in my part, are -- really are questions. 1 don't know if I'm right or wrong at this stage even on an opinion matter. We're raising questions, kind of equity, everyone's tax money going to possibly a beach that a limited number of people realistically can use. And 1 think you're saying, even if that's true -- and 1 don't know that it is -- even if that's true, there's sort of a health, safety, and welfare aspect or a coastal management aspect separate from public use of a beach that merits serious consideration for doing this project. MS. LUPO: Well, I would think that Hideaway Beach in a certain aspect protects the beaches that are to the south end of - - of the coastline. And if we lose Hideaway Beach, we might be in danger of losing the beach off -- off residents' beach. I don't know it, but I'd like to see the report on that. MR. PIRES: 1 think -- following on what Ashley has indicated, Page 57 JU16641 and if that is the case, then 1 think that we may want to look at the committee -- look at No. 12 of the grant application for the Hideaway Beach renourishment because right now it states that -- how does it enhance the existing TDC program? It says it will enhance public access and viability if there's a better, more honest reason for it, more -- more specific, accurate reason, mean, for it. 1 think we may want to do it if they -- if the indication is that it protects other beaches, other facilities. MS. LUPO: Well, the whole -- whole geology of the area, mean, the -- the beach is there for a reason. And if -- and if that goes away, then it's going to have to affect other aspects of the coastline. 1 guess another question 1 would have is, how often -- if we get into the fill aspect of that, how often are we going to have to renourish that fill, and where is that fill going, 1 mean, as far as -- is it going to end up somewhere where we're going to have to end up dredging in order to preserve other aspects of the coastline, just to look at it from a cost - analysis basis of what we want to do? MS. LUPO: 1 just have a lot of questions, and I'd like to have a presentation . MR. ANDERSON: If 1 could, I'd like to ask Ken Humiston who prepared this report for us to address your question, ma'am. MS. LUPO: Thank you. MR. HUMISTON: Ken Humiston with Humiston Moore Engineers. I guess the first thing I'd like to mention is that we are the county's consultant on the county project down on Hideaway Beach. We also did prepare this little access report for the Hideaway Beach Association. We did -- we were asked by the Hideaway Beach Association to do that because we have a fair amount of experience in the area, and they felt like we could probably do that fairly easily with the background that we had in Page 58 JU16J4 that area. And we discussed that with Harry Huber and the county staff to be sure that there was no question of a conflict for us to do that. A couple of issues that were just raised: One is the question of whether or not there are other benefits besides the beach access that accrue from beach nourishment, and certainly there are. There have been some fairly detailed economic studies of beach restoration projects in Florida that quantify what are -- what are called secondary benefits from beach restoration projects. They help the -- the property values in the area which improves the tax base for the county, and the biggest beneficiary of that is the county school system, for example. The question of whether or not ongoing erosion in Hideaway Beach could have adverse effects in other areas, it could -- if you have erosion that's uncontrolled and it ends up being addressed by building seawalls to protect the shoreline, what that does is it transfers the erosion problems to the adjacent areas. And the question of Hideaway Beach, if that weren't nourished, then, you know, in the extreme situation, if that all was -- that entire shoreline was sea - walled, it would essentially remove some of the supply of sand and the natural transport processes to the beaches to the south which is Tigertail Beach. Of course, the other thing is that the beaches are also the nesting habitat for the endangered turtles, and we have -- through the monitoring that Maura Kraus has been doing for the county and the physical monitoring that we've been doing of the county's erosion control efforts in there, we have been able to demonstrate that there have been benefits to the nesting sea turtles in that area as well. Those are several questions that came up. I'll be glad to answer any other questions that -- MR. STRAPPONI: 1'd like to ask a question. I -- I'm first Page 59 juJe6A& inclined to think that natural renourishment of the beach is -- is probably the way to go as opposed to a boardwalk. 1 -- 1 share the concerns of some of the other committee members on how long that would stay there before we had to get into a renourishment and what that cost would be. 1 don't know if you can see this aerial from -- from there. My concern is this section right here (indicating). 1 can't understand -- maybe you can explain to me -- how we can put a natural nourishment in here so that we could have foot traffic access to this beach without blocking what appears to be a -- a small inlet there. MR. HUMISTON: Yeah. The -- the figure that we're looking at here is Figure No. 2 in the lower right -hand corner, that title block. What's shown there, the -- the blue line is, of course, the boardwalk. The little short segment of boardwalk that -- to the south there actually goes across an inlet which is known as Clam Pass. It's sometimes referred to as Little Clam Pass to avoid confusion with the other Clam Pass that's up in Pelican Bay. But there's no -- in this plan there was no proposal for nourishment in that area. There is a wide natural beach there. The only purpose in putting that boardwalk across that little inlet is to facilitate pedestrian traffic across the inlet to the areas further to the north. And that is why the -- that little segment of boardwalk over the inlet is shown in both alternatives, the beach restoration alternative as well as the boardwalk alternative. This study that we prepared for the Hideaway Beach Association was -- was not an in -depth study. It was a rather cursory look at a couple of alternatives for improving access in that area. There certainly are some permitting issues that would have to be resolved, and there are permitting issues with both the boardwalk and the beach restoration. The beach restoration would be placing sand in front of some mangroves that fringe that shoreline which would be a Page 60 JU46X1 concern to the agencies. This is also close to the -- the Sand Dollar Island area, which is a bird, rookery, and roosting area. And it may very well be that the -- the optimum solution to this might be a combination of nourishment and boardwalk. And 1 think the next phase, the next step in pursuing this, would be a consultation with the permitting agencies on those permitting issues. MR. STRAPPONI: So it's my understanding that if you went strictly with beach renourishment, that would include this -- the small section of boardwalk across the inlet? MR. HUMISTON: Right. There would just be a little foot bridge across that inlet. MS. LUPO: It is a very small area for anybody who hasn't been to that -- the boardwalk, the south boardwalk is -- is minimal. I don't have a -- do you have a footage on that? MR. HUMISTON: No. That -- that little, inlet is only 15 or 20 feet wide. MR. PIRES: 1 guess assuming for the sake of discussion that all these were permitted and constructed, how would you get access over the T- groins to get to the balance of Hideaway Beach once you get off of the boardwalk and get to that -- MR. HUMISTON: The T- groins have essentially stabilized the beach in that area. So the T- groins kind of stick out into the water, but there are pocket beaches between the T- groins, and there is no problem walking across there. The T- groins are very low profile. And, in fact, the landward portion of them is under the sand, and you don't even see them. MR. PIRES: Thank you. MR. KROESCHELL: You touched on a problem that 1 -- that 1 have in my mind, so 1 went down there. I went down -- I don't know if anybody else has been down there, but 1 went down there last week, and 1 walked the beach. 1 hadn't been down Page 61 ,1.C� there since 1980, and then in 1980 1 -- I walked that whole beach from Tigertail around to Hideaway before Hideaway was much of anything. And we got as far as -- well, beyond that little inlet. We walked across the inlet -- that was no problem -- and -- and got up a little ways further, and then we ran out of beach. And -- and as my -- those are mangroves after that; right? MR. HUMISTON:- Some of it is mangrove. MR. KORESCHELL: And -- and -- and would -- would renourishing the beach do anything to the mangroves? Would they just be destroyed? MR. HUMISTON: 1 don't know that they would be destroyed. It would certainly, in -- in the terms that the permitting agencies use, it would sever the tidal exchange to the mangrove area which can injure the mangroves. MR. KROESCHELL: We might have trouble getting a permit to do that. MR. HUMISTON: That's correct. It might require some mitigation. That's what was -- MR. KROESCHELL: And that's why 1 say to my colleague here, 1 -- I'm -- I'm afraid that a boardwalk would be about the only alternative because of that -- of those mangroves being in there . MR. HUMISTON: That's very possible. That's why 1 mentioned the ultimate solution might be a combination of nourishment in some areas where it won't affect the mangroves and the boardwalk in other wear -- in other areas to preserve the tidal exchange. MR. KROESCHELL: As 1 recall, back in those days, 1 -- 1 -- there was some small amount of building going on, and 1 noticed that some of the people were cutting down mangroves in -- in those days. But 1 guess that was -- that was before the laws started taking effect in this area. But -- but there are -- there are Page 62 mangroves there. MR. HUMISTON: A lot of it is. There are -- there are some other species in there as well, but a lot of it is mangrove. MR. KROESCHELL: Yeah. Just a -- a small point: It -- it -- it would be accessible from Tigertail, but I'll bet there's nobody going to do it because it's a long haul. It's a -- it's a -- we -- we walked a half an hour before we got -- got -- got to the point where we were turned off, and then we were still -- if you -- if you had another -- it would take another 45 -- it would take 45 minutes to get to Hideaway Beach from Tigertail if you were walking at any speed. It's -- it's not public access per se. It's -- it's a pretty difficult access. MR. PIRES: Ken, two questions, if 1 may -- Ken, I guess -- how would you then for the Hideaway Beach renourishment -- how would you answer No. 12 on the grant application about describing how the project enhances existing county towards development programs? I'm wrestling with the existing answer that says this project will enhance the public access and viability of the area's major tourist attraction. MR. HUMISTON: By improving access, you provide the opportunity for people to walk from Tigertail Beach around to the Hideaway Beach, which is public beach. There is an erosion control line established there in the project in 1990. But there -- you know, 1 can't really address the question of, you know, to what level will people who go to Tigertail beach use that beach. MR. PIRES: And 1 guess from a concept of utilization, assuming the boardwalk is in, is there a concept of -- in part of the proposal to increase awareness of its existence and to have other ways to encourage people's utilization of the facility other than just mere beach access, such as, you know, stations where they describe the -- you know, the nature of environment that's out there a little ways to -- Page 63 J46JI MR. HUMISTON: I think 1 would prefer to turn that back over to Bruce Anderson to -- MR. PIRES: Okay. MR. HUMISTON: -- address that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: 1 wanted to ask Mr. Humiston if -- if this is something even possible to answer, how -- you know, I -- 1 had said before -- and I don't know if I'm literally correct, but laymen at least generally anticipate that renourishments will -- should last around five years, and then you expect to have to perhaps do more work on it. Would -- would this project fit into that general observation, or is it even possible to answer something like that? And I'm not asking you to, like, really commit -- MR. HUMISTON: Yeah. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And I'm saying look into the future, but you do know more about this than 1 do . MR. HUMISTON: Yeah. I can answer that in -- in general terms. Basically when you do a beach restoration project, you make a projection of how long it will last. And that projection is usually simply based on what the background erosion rates are prior to doing the nourishment project. In this particular area, the nourishment proposed for access, 1 don't think the erosion rates have been very high in that area. I think it's been a very slow, gradual process. And just based on that, 1 would think it would be a good prospect for a successful project with a renourishment interval probably even greater than five years, depending on how wide a beach would be constructed there. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And this will carry into fiscal '03, right, because last time 1 asked, and 1 think you said this isn't -- this request -- I guess I'm addressing this to the county staff. This request isn't really the actual renourishment; it's the design. MR. MUDD: It's the design. It's getting everything set up so Page 64 J46J4 that you can do it in the next year. There's -- there's not a dredging event in No. 9. Okay. It's the search, it's the permit, it's the design, survey, and all of those other things that you must do in order to get it done. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So then in '03 --1 realize I'm shifting to the 10 -year plan now and then -- even though it's a separate item, but it's hard to do this in complete isolation. In '03 city of Marco Island beach renourishment is 280,000 -- I -- no, two -- no, two -- 638,000, and I couldn't see from our requests here where that figure comes from. Mr. Huber did the spreadsheet, I think. MR. MUDD: Yeah. He did the spreadsheet. And Harry com -- and Harry combined some of the things so -- it's one of the things that we've been trying to decipher because it isn't in the same specificity as the -- as the budget request. So, you know, the question was, well, where is turtle monitoring at? Well, we found where that was. It's rolled up into the monitoring issue. But that's a good question, okay, when you -- when you -- the city of Marco, as far as beach renourishment is concerned, and 1 -- and 1 can't tell you if part of the access route -- access is in there in that number. I'm at a little disadvantage because Harry isn't -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: No, 1 understand. And that's why I wanted to -- to say it out loud -- MR. MUDD: Sure. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- that we -- we all understand that. MR. PIRES: One question, Mr. Mudd: The initial construction of the two groin fields that were constructed as advanced implementation of the management study, do you know if they were paid for out of the TDC funds? MR. MUDD: Yes. 1 can -- I can tell you that the previous T- groins were -- were -- were paid for out of TDC, and the two that we're inputting right now are paid out of the TDC funds. Page 65 J46J4 MR. PIRES: And this Hideaway Beach renourishment would help with that initial groin -field construction and implementation of the inlet management -- MR. MUDD: Yes. The T- groins are there to -- to try to keep the beach that's there and to capture any that's -- that's eroding out. It's a -- it's a training mechanism. One of the problems we're having is somebody mentioned an -- an island that's -- that's -- because of the Australian -- MR. ROELLING: Pines. MR. MUDD: -- pines -- MR. GRAY: Coconut Island. MR. MUDD: Yeah. -- Coconut Island and the Australian pines -- help me out a little bit. I'm working through this one -- where they took out the -- they took out the pines, and then now all of a sudden the island's moving. Well, it's okay if the island's staying in one place. Then you got the T- groins and water's going around it, and you pretty much got the hydrology finished. The island starts moving; which T -groin is going to be the final one? What you'd like to do with those training structures is you'd like to keep the last one on -- on -- in the inland side farther north, and you'd like to have the -- the most southern one, for lack of direction. And in the in- betweens you'd like to be able to pull out sometime. MR. PIRES: Is it possible, then, to say, as far as how this project enhances the existing county tourist development program, is that it compliments and supplements a prior TDC- funded program and maintains its viability ?. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. PIRES; I think that what it really does as opposed to enhance its public access. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. We can do -- we can do part of the -- MR. PIRES: Just a thought. I'm just trying to be more Page 66 JA 6X1 accurate as to what it does. 1 don't know how the rest of the committee feels but -- MR. GRAY: 1 have another thought on it. 1 share, I think, several of the opinions that have been expressed about what we're theoretically looking at here is using public funds to fund a private project. 1 would like to point out two things. 1 mean, 1 do have some concerns about that, but 1 would like to point out two things. I think that right now we have that in effect going on in the county already. 1 mentioned Pelican Bay. You can make an argument that that's going on there. Number 2, 1 think to keep this beach in good shape is part of the overall integrity of the beaches in Collier County, and 1 think it's in the county's best interest and in our best interest to keep that beach in good shape just because we need to have a good beach program. And I think if this beach went away and caused other problems, it would detract from our total beach situation in the county. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MR. STAKICH: I'd like to make some observations here. love been on Marco Island for 20 years and been involved in renourishing the beach, the main beach. At that time, as the picture up there shows, that area there was accessible from Tigertail. We -- we have solved already the problem, all -- should public money be spent for Hideaway Beach. It isn't being spent for Hideaway Beach; it's being spent for Marco Island. The people on Marco Island, the county, for years have been complaining that they have not been able to get to the beach on Marc -- on Hideaway Beach, and this solves that problem. 1 think that tying -- as has been said here, tying these beaches together are very important for the entirety of all the beaches. 1 think the funds being spent there are intelligent. 1 think that the use of the sand when we originally dredged the Page 67 9 r� main beach, we had to go out in the gulf. We had to get the sand out there. We brought it on the beach and did a magnificent job. As far as maintenance of this, whether it's going to be there or not, 1 don't think anybody here, including our engineers, could tell us that this is going to exist any more than it's going to tell us that the stuff in the past is going to exist and how long it's going to exist and whether we've got to maintain it. 1 think our job is to understand that if we're going to maintain all the other places that are going to erode or move, which it has been shown that Coconut Island, for example, is moving. 1 remember 20 years ago it was a great picnic spot. Today it's just an little -- unbelievable little -- little sand pit. Things do change, and I think our job here is to understand that these dollars are available to the city of Marco Island, to the county for use to tie Tigertail and have public access to the beach that we renourished at Hideaway Beach. And 1 think it is well -spent dollars and consideration that we renourish and think of -- of filling sand, if possible, if the engineering can be done and if you can find it. I'm sure you can find sand to pump on this area. 1 -- as a final remark, 1 think a boardwalk there has a lot of drawbacks: safety, getting to it, maintenance, blocking the views of many things and adding another obstruction out there in the water that 1 don't think we really need. So I'm not being prejudiced, but remembering that 20 years of development and concern of the people of Marco Island and the people of Collier County that have always said, "Let's find a way to get to Tige -- to Hideaway Beach.". Now, we certainly can get to Hideaway Beach by boat, and we certainly can use the beach on Hideaway. 1 think the courts have determined that the use of these funds are proper. I think the county has already determined that the use of these funds for Page 68 16,k11 Hideaway Beach are proper. So 1 think continuation of this and adding this sand to this portion pretty well develops the whole situation that ties it altogether. MR. ROELLIG: 1'd like to make a comment. Because -- know we've discuss -- decided that we would vote on this in a block, but there may be items like this that we may want to have a separate vote on because we may not get , you know -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, right. Exactly right. What 1 was going to sugg -- 1 said that in the beginning because I -- most of these things 1 think we can group. But -- but when we get to the end, we can have a little discussion, and we can tailor our motion any way we choose to -- to separate certain ones out or to put certain conditions -- for example, on Item 6, 1 would assume we're going to want to discuss if that's an inadvertent double count will accrue such confirmation that it's a unique item, that type of thing. 1 also wanted -- this is a little off topic. 1 meant to say this at the beginning, and I forgot. I apologize. But 1 have to leave at four. That, of course, doesn't end the meeting, but as -- as we're gearing up here, we've all, I'm sure, had commitments we had made before we knew we'd be on this committee. And then I'll -- I'll hand the chair over, of course, but 1 will have to leave at about four o'clock. Back to the -- the business at hand. I think we'll get to the access -- get into it in more detail probably in sequential order. 1 understand that 9 and 12 do relate. Is there anything more that anyone has to ask or to comment on on the Hideaway Beach renourishment or anyone from the public who wishes to say anything? MR. SOMERS: Just real quickly, My name's David Somers. I'm the general manager at Hideaway. And just to go back to Dr. Staiger's point that he brought out earlier, Hideaway was part of Page 69 iu1e6JDJ the original renourishment back in 1990 that occurred on all of Marco's beaches. And the renourishment that occurred on really the main portion of the beach has been very stable and has lasted and gone, 1 think, well beyond what the engineers anticipated. The area that we have that's adjacent to Hideaway Beach is unique in the sense that it is on an inlet. It is on a river. And it has a lot of different energies working into it besides just the normal beach erosion that would come backwards and forwards, the tidal flow, the river that goes in front. The Big Marco Pass certainly creates a lot of difference on that. 1 thought Mr. Moss, who's the city manager, would be here today. 1 mentioned to him about the meeting. He wasn't able to. And this item has been brought before the Marco Beach committee when that was in existence. It was approved unanimously before them, both projects. And 1 believe it did go to the county -- or the city councilmen for review as well. And Mr. Moss certainly is a supporter of this, and he feels that, as Mr. Stak -- or Mr. Stackich mentioned, that, you know, this is part of all of island and that this is an integral part to the rest of the beach that if something does happen up here and occurs up here, that it's just going to create additional property damage or damages down the rest of the island and the island beaches. So there has been a lot of discussion on Marco. It's not the first time coming before you. And there have been a number of items, 1 think -- I've been there nine years. We've been before the TDC and the different -- Naples committee and the Marco Beach committee. And all of the projects that have been for that particular area, Hideaway Beach area, have always been approved using the TDC funding. And as Bruce, Mr. Anderson, mentioned, 1 think there has been a lot of resolve in the last six months or so, in particular in response to the county commissioners' questions of the use of that money and in Page 70 J1611, reference to the meeting that that occurred at. So if you have any additional questions, I'll be happy to help with that, but 1 just wanted to get a little bit of the history into it as well. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Are there any further questions from the committee? Okay. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. Number 10 is Marco Island segmented breakwater modifications, project to improve performance of the breakwater. This involves engineering work and modification of a -- of an underwater easement for 10,000 and construction and tote -- for a total of 705,100. And this project is identical to what was in the original application. MR. MUDD: This is a -- this is basically -- I think there's two of them out there, breakwaters, right now. This is to add a third and to bring the two that -- there a little bit closer together. MR. ROELLIG: I understand the permit is basically approved already on this -- MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. ROELLIG: -- or it is approved. MR. ANDERSON: Caxambas Pass, project to improve the pass by dredging, engineering and dredging, 335,000. And that's the -- the -- the report that we passed out. That's the project for that that report refers to. MR. KROESCHELL: Is this the -- is this the first dredging of Caxambas Pass? MR. ANDERSON: 1 don't know. 1 don't know. MR. MUDD: No, sir. 1 think -- 1 think if you take a look at the ten year -- now, 1 can't tell you the pass, but I think it's been dredged before. In '02 there's -- there's three thirty -five in the long -term plan for Caxambas. It's No. 6, A -6, on your ten -year plan. There's some minor maintenance that goes on with it around the tune of about 25,000 a year. Page 71 JU46J4 MR. KROESCHELL: For, like, seven years; right ?. MR. MUDD: And then in 2009 you do it again, about seven years -- MR. KROESCHELL: So was it done seven years ago? just want -- want to know. MR. MUDD: 1 can't tell you, sir. MR. ROELLIG: My recollection, it was, but Mr. Humiston probably could give us a specific answer. MR. HUMISTON: Caxambas Pass was dredged back in 1990 and 1991 as part of the source for the beach restoration project on Marco Island that was completed then. And it was dredged again several years later, more for navigation purposes, 1 think, about 1995 or '96. So it's been dredged twice before, actually. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions on Item 11? MR. ANDERSON: The next item, then, would be No. 13, Pelican Bay Services Division, the Clam Pass project. This would dredge the inlet to provide for a -- a healthy ecosystem there. It's monitoring and dredging for 169,100. In the original application we showed an amount of 205,100. And the reason for this reduction is that we've gone ahead with monitoring of -- in this present fiscal year to the tune of $36,000 to advance that. That was based on some previous discussions that Harry had, you know, with -- on the project. So for the amount for FY '02, then, would be $169,100. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Any questions? MR. MUDD: This looks like a every- three -year event. MR. ROELLIG: I might make a comment. This is an excellent source of beach - quality sand for the Clam Pass county park. It's very high - quality sand, and it's very low -- very low cost to put on -- put on the beach. There is a strong benefit for dredging this and placing the sand on the county beach typically. MR. ANDERSON: Uh -huh. Page 72 JU4 6XI CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Anything else on 13? 1 just want to go back briefly and clarify for -- for the Hideaway Beach projects, Items 9 and 12 -- and obviously they're getting the most action from us -- the county staff recommends approval of those item -- 1 appreciate Mr. Anderson's background, but he's here as an advocate. MR. MUDD: Sir, the county staff recommends those two projects, one, to get the -- to get all the -- the permits and the sand search and everything done so that you can renourish Hideaway Beach the correct way. And the -- and the -- and the -- No. 12 and the fact that we go out and find a way to link those beaches together, since they -- and as the gentleman at the far end mentioned that when he took a walk, the only way to really get in is to get in and out of those mangroves, you have to go back in and kind of skirt it around in order to get up. We need to improve that process. Some beach has been lost. We haven't had a -- a gain of beach, okay, in a very long time. We're losing it, and we're fighting that process that nature has as far as erosion is concerned. And it would be a shame if we -- if we get it any more eroded than it already is, and then it gets to be at a point in time that you'll never be able to bring them back together again. MR. ANDERSON: On Item No. 12, 1 would mention that we will be moving forward doing preliminary design work first and looking at the two different alternatives and pursuing the permit issues. So we -- we don't know which way we'll be going, but -- and we will certainly keep the committee informed of that development. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Then if there aren't any other further questions, 1 think -- 1 did want to avoid doing 13 motions when 1 or maybe 2 might do the trick just in hopes of efficiency. Six is a fairly minor matter. But, nonetheless, we'll Page 73 J46J4 need to clarify if that's a double count or if it's a unique item. Is there anything else that any member would -- would like to have voted on separately? MS. LUPO: Did we get an answer on No. 3 regarding the -- MR. MUDD: Yeah. We don't give -- we don't give grants to the Fish and Wildlife Service. That's a typo. We accept them. MR. STRAPPONI:- Mr. Chairman, 1 have a question on -- back on Item 12. What are the time lines? Are there any projected time lines? Are we on a -- on a clock on this? MR. MUDD: Sir, as soon as -- as soon as it gets -- as soon as it gets through this process, then it becomes an accepted project, and it -- and it gets approved by the TDC, then we need to do staff work in order to cut the contracts in order to get that to get it rolling, and you -- and we really don't get into '01 dollars in order to get that done. So that would have to go to contract and be ready to execute on 1 October. So we go out there into the bid issue, ask -- ask firms to solicit their bids; go low -- low bid, unless it gets very technical, and then you go best value, but to get it ready to go so that when October comes, you can start spending those dollars that you have allocated to that project on that project. And then when -- once you -- once you have it locked in, then you can start doing it. In -- in this particular case, this shouldn't have a sea turtle impact unless you're out there dredging where it's going to have a sea turtle impact and you've got to worry about the incidental takes. But because there's no beach there, there isn't much of a nest area for them. So we will probably be into the execution side of this project around this time next year. As you get through the designs and that bit and the -- and the permits, next year around this time you'll be into construction. MR. STRAPPONI: Well, that -- that brings up my next question: construction of what? That's the boardwalk? Page 74 JU1111"11 MR. MUDD: No. No, sir. What -- what will happen, as we go out there and ask for the bid and that -- we'll go out to that engineer firm. We'll meet with the -- with the permitting agencies to figure out what they permit and what they won't permit. No sense coming up with a project you're never going to see a permit for. You're going to waste a lot of money to get nothing. Get them on board as you go through that and figure out if you can find a viable alternative that everybody can agree to that gets the job done that acts as -- to the beach from Tigertail to -- to Hideaway and then go out there and get the AE firm to do the design and then come back to this board with the design and say, "Okay. Is this really what we want, and does anybody have a tweak?". You're the expert panel. We're going back to you with the design. We don't go into autopilot. We're going to come back to you as a board and say, "Okay. Is this -- is -this what we had envisioned? Is -- is this what we want to have ?" and then if -- if you say it is, fine. If you have a modification to it, we'll go back, get the permitting agencies, go through that process. If you say, "No, it's not," it's dead. Okay. We can go back and say, "We can't get there from here. It was a good idea. We had it budgeted, but we -- we can't spend the dollars." and then we'll go back to the TDC with a different project and get that one that's below the line brought up to the front. MR. GRAY: Mr. Chairman -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MR. GRAY: -- I would move that we accept all 13 of these items. MR. STAKICH: 1 second that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Would you add with the provision as to Item 6 that we simply have confirmation that it is a unique item? Page 75 J46J4 MR. GRAY: Yes. MR. MUDD: Can -- can you also add that if when 1 find that out I can confirm that, I can -- 1 can give it to the chairman and say it is a separate item -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, 1 think we can approve -- 1 think we can approve it subject to it being a distinct item. And if it's not, you know, if we have -- we haven't approved it, it doesn't exist. MR. GRAY: I -- 1 think my motion has included in -- in it inherently that we're just talking about one item here, that -- that we're just buying one piece of equipment. That's included in one place or the other or not both. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Right. In effect that's what we're saying. MR. GRAY: In effect that's what we're saying. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. MR. GRAY: So I'll let my motion stand. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And then we did have a second? MR. STAKICH: 1 second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All in favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It passes 8 -0. This will be a good time for me to exit since 1 do have to exit. And, again, 1 apologize. Our next scheduled meeting, 1 want to note, is July 5th, which is an odd -- not an odd day, but being after the 4th, it may be a -- a difficult day. 1 will, in general, be a good attendee, but 1 probably will not be in town on July 5th. And maybe others can communicate to -- to the staff whether we'll be available. And 1 don't know if a lot of people might be gone. We -- are we going Page 76 J46J4 to have a quorum problem? Wait. Maybe that's -- is the 5th a holiday? MR. MUDD: No. MR. ROELLIG: No. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Would it -- would it be better -- I know it's the first Thursday, but -- in this particular month, because of the day that it falls on, it would be better to have it on the second Thursday of July. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That would certainly work for me. You know, 1 will -- MR. KROESCHELL: It doesn't make any difference to me. 1'11 be gone both times. MR. ROELLIG: Well, I'm gone the second Thursday. Maybe we could just have a hand of who -- who will miss the first Thursday and go from there. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'll miss the first. MR. GRAY: (Indicating) MR. KROESCHELL: (Indicating) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We still have a quorum. MR. ROELLIG: Yeah. We have a quorum. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But we'd have no Naples people. I think all the Naples people put their hands up. MR. STRAPPONI: 1'd like to make a motion that we just change it for the one time to the second Thursday. MR. STAKICH: 1 have no problem with that. I -- I'll check on that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. ROELLIG: 1 know I'll miss the second Thursday. MR. KROESCHELL: I'll miss the second Thursday. MR. ROELLIG: Well, we have two missing the second Thursday but -- MR. GRAY: I will too. Page 77 J46J4 MR. STAKICH: There's one missing on the second and two on the first Tues -- so let's go with the second Thursday. And don't forget; it's 1:30 instead of 1:00. MR. ROELLIG: Well, first, we're missing three on both Thursdays. MR. STAKICH: You're -- you're missing both? MR. ROELLIG: No. But there's two people missing on both the first Thursday and the second Thursday. 1 don't know what. MR. MUDD: How about -- how about the third Thursday of July? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: What day is that? MR. GRAY: Still gone. I'm gone all of July. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Does it work -- MR. STRAPPONI: Or do you want -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We just had a suggestion of the last Thursday of June. MR. STRAPPONI: That would work. I'll be back. MR. GRAY: I -- 1 think that would be a good idea if we can get all of us here because we are still a new committee, and we're learning. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. GRAY: And we made some major decisions here today in short order, and I'm not very comfortable with that, but 1 felt like we should do it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yeah. We have to -- we have to start somewhere. 1 agree with you. MR. GRAY: We got -- we got to get it going. But I think it would be -- if we can get all of us here the last Thursday in June, 1 would suggest we do that. MR. ROELLIG: 1 can do that. MR. STRAPPONI: Mr. Chairman, the -- the last Thursday in June is only three business days prior to the first Thursday in Page 78 Jui0111 July, so I'm going to pass a motion that we have our next meeting on the last Thursday in June. MR. GRAY: Second. MR. ROELLIG: Second that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Before we take a vote on that, noting that it is only three business days' difference, does that make sense from a work -flow standpoint, the staff and commission ?? MR. MUDD: That would be fine. The only thing I have to find out, if this room is available. If it's not, I'll find an alternative location. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. I'll do it formally then by motion. All in favor of holding our meeting on June 28th? (All those in favor responded.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? It passes. MR. KROESCHELL: Me. I'm opposed. I can't make that one either. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. So we have our first dissent as -- as a -- as a committee. That passes -- that passes 7 to 1. As 1 said, this is a good time for me to break. I will hand the chair to Mr. Roellig for the further business and see you -all in a few weeks. (Chairman Galleberg left the room.) MR. MUDD: Is there any -- we're at the point in time of old business. Is there any additional old business that we need to talk about? MR. ROELLIG: Are we going to talk about parks and recreation and all of that kind of thing, or is that not in our purview anymore? MR. MUDD: That's no longer in our purview anymore, sir. MR. ROELLIG: All right. MR. MUDD: Now, I will -- now, 1 will say to you that I think it Page 79 JA 611 would -- it would benefit this committee if the parks and rec folks came to us twice a year to tell you how their particular programs are working because -- because it does come out of Category A. And if they do have any slippages and we have projects that they don't, that we could use those dollars to make sure -- I'll talk staffwise, but 1 think it would be good if you knew how the Vanderbilt Beach parking garage was coming and -- and that so you have an idea on that. But there is another committee that parks and recs uses to -- to provide those projects to them within their purview of this budget. MR. ROELLIG: The other point 1 might make on the earlier Category A funding was this -- this sheet here, Item D, City of Naples. That was passed by the previous committee in April. don't know if we need to revisit that. MR. MUDD: And that -- and that was -- and that was approved by the TDC because it had seen that beach -- MR. ROELLIG: Right. Just to give everybody -- so we're not going to -- unless somebody has some questions on it, we're not going to be looking at the monitoring of South Florida T- groins or monitoring of Doctor's Pass. MR. MUDD: But in -- in -- in the future, as we look at the program, those particular projects are in that program. MR. ROELLIG: Right, right. MR. MUDD: Based on -- MR. ROELLIG: That would be one of the things we talked about earlier that we will see how it's progressing. Okay. So we're on to Item -- Item 5. Is there any old business? MR. GRAY: 1 don't know if this is old business or not, but I'll bring it up now. MR. ROELLIG: All right. MR. GRAY: 1 would like to suggest that staff somehow Page 80 PTA provide us with some name placards to put up here. 1 think it would help everyone, the transcriber, the folks in the audience, even all of us, because we're new to each other. MR. MUDD: Done. 1 had already -- making a note of it as we were -- started. 1 said, "We need to do something for names. ". MR. ROELLIG: Okay. Going on to Item 6, do we need any additional discussion on the ten -year plan? MR. MUDD: Well, there's an old business that -- item that did come up -- and 1 mentioned it earlier -- where we owe you a briefing upon the present programming and what stuff moved forward. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. MR. MUDD: Okay? So the next -- the next agenda that we have, the last Thursday of -- of this month, we plan -- God willing that Harry's back, and I'll get -- or I'll get Dr. Staiger to help me, we owe you a briefing on the present program; what's been done, what's been spent, what's being carried over for a project that didn't get done last year so that you're up to speed where that is. MR. GRAY: Along with that, would you include -- 1 guess this would be under maybe old business. Rather than to go into the ten -year plan today, I would like to go into it then. We've talked about it to some degree, but as I've looked at it, there have been a lot of questions that have come up in my mind. But with the chairman having been gone and the hour is late, I would like to put that on the agenda for next time. MR. ROELLIG: You weren't looking for an approval of the ten -year plan at this point anyway. MR. MUDD: Oh, no, no, no, no, no. That -- the part -- the reason the ten -year plan was there, you asked us to take a look and show you where there was some flexibilities, and we talked about it a little bit earlier. MR. ROELLIG: All right. Page 81 i MR. MUDD: There's millions in there that you've got flexibility with. MR. ROELLIG: Right. Well, we may want to talk about it today, I mean, to get the background on it . MR. MUDD: And so what I wanted to show you, where -- where it is. And it's basically on that carry - forward line. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. MUDD: And if you -- you look at the shaded area underneath, you'll -- you'll see where that exists. And as projects get completed and you get bids that come under what your estimate is, you'll have additional dollars to put up against different projects. So there -- there is flexibility in the process. And, again, this was just our best guess. MR. GRAY: I understand that. I -- 1 would like to put that on the agenda for next time, though, and review it. MR. MUDD: Sure. MR. ROELLIG: Especially if Harry is available. MR. GRAY: Yes. And 1 also wondered, too, is Dr. Staiger going to be attending our meetings? MR. MUDD: Yes. I've -- I've -- I've asked him to, and 1 -- I think as -- as -- as 1 start -- well, when Harry comes back, that will help a little bit as I transition to another lead PM in that 1 think Dr. Staiger's presence, and his ex -- he doesn't carry any bias, don't think. He just comes out with expertise and gives you a lot of data. He just said he couldn't make it today. MR. GRAY: I see. sir. MR. MUDD: But -- but his plan is to make these meetings, MR. ROELLIG: Good. I guess we could go on to Item 7, audience participation. Is there any -- anybody from the audience want to comment on anything? (No response.) Page 82 Jul"11 MR. ROELLIG: Seeing none, I guess my turn during the last five minutes, we have a motion for adjournment. MR. STAKICH: 1 make a motion that we adjourn. MR. STRAPPONI: 1 second. MR. ROELLIG: All in favor ... (Uanimous response.) There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:05 p.m. COASTAL AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE GARY GALLEBERG, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY BARBARA A. DONOVAN, RMR, CRR Page 83 Jury kill Carter i•ienMnp �--� -- Coletta TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE June 27, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee met on this date at 1:40 p.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building F of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRPERSON: Gary Galleberg Anthony P. Pires, Jr. David Roellig John P. Strapponi Robert B. Stakich Robert Gray NOT PRESENT: James L. Snediker Ashley D. Lupo William Kroeschell ALSO PRESENT: James Mudd, Public Utilities Administrator Roy Anderson, Public Utilities, Director of Engineering Allen Madsen, Inspector Misc. Comes: Jane E. Eichhorn, TDC Coortor Dom% f Item# /W 1 Page 1 Copies To: JUJ441 Jacqueline Hubbard Robinson, Assistant County Attorney Jon C. Staiger, Ph.D., City of Naples Natural Resources Manager Page 2 Jul 6JJ, CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We'll call to order the June 27th, 2001, meeting of the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee. We've got some absent members today. Why don't we just do a voice roll down at the end starting with Mr. Gray. MR. GRAY: Bob Gray here. MR. PIKES: Tony Pires here. MR. STRAPPONI: John Strapponi here. MR. STAKICH: Bob Stakich. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Gary Galleberg here. MR. ROELLIG: David Roellig. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And the remaining members are absent today as we start. Mr. Anderson, first we have TDC overview. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. We -- at the last meeting, it was requested that TDC be invited to come here to explain the relationship of their program and our program and how the funding fits together, so Jane Eichhorn has been gracious enough to -- and Jackie Robinson, their attorney, have been gracious enough to agree to give us a presentation this -- this afternoon. So I would just turn it over to -- to them. Jane . MS. EICHHORN: Good afternoon. For the record, Jane Eichhorn. I'm the TDC coordinator for the county. I gathered some information for all of you today; some statistical information, the revenue that is generated each month from the tourist development tax. If you flip to the first section of your pamphlet ... MR. MUDD: Does everybody have one now? MS. EICHHORN: This information is the statistical information that is generated each month by the tax collector. The revenue is received in at the tax collector's office and then is sent to the county, and the data is faxed to our office, and I generated this Page 3 ,unlbJd statistical information. And this is up until, I think, May. Yes, the revenue collected is up until May. We've projected about $9.2 million in revenue this fiscal year. You can see on the third page of that chart -- that is the monthly revenue by area -- Naples, City of Naples, generates approximately 28 percent; Marco Island, about 26 percent. Collier County at this point is 45 percent of the revenue. Immokalee is zero right now. Everglades City is 1 percent, and there's other. And other -- the other category is late fees, penalties, and things like that. The next page is where the revenue comes from, where it's generated from. As you can see, the majority of the revenue is generated from the hotel /motel industry. At this point there's -- $5 million have been generated from the hotel /motel industry. The next section in your booklet is the new ordinance, the new TDC ordinance, that was approved approximately two weeks -- two to three weeks ago. We used the $9.2 million that we estimate being generated this year and multiplied it by an average of 5 percent. We used the 5 percent increase -- that is approximately what it's increased every year -- to give us $9.66 million for next year. And you can see the breakdown with the new percentages. 100 percent of the 1 percent will always go to beach renourishment. That will never change. And one hundred -- or 50 percent of the 2 percent will go to beach renourishment. That's the portion that has changed. It used to be 70 percent. Now we reduced it to 50 percent. Fifty percent will go to Category B and C; which breaks down to 23.236 percent; Category B, which is advertising promotion and special events. Category C -1 is county -owned museums, which is 19 percent, and C -2, which is other county museums not -- not owned and operated by the county, 7.764 percent, which totals the $9.6 million for next year. il 6,Jol, And you've already seen the ten -year plan that Jim Mudd has presented to you at your last meeting. This is the -- that is the ordinance that went to the board. Then next -- next section in your pamphlet is the state statute. That basically gives you the guidelines that you can follow how the revenue is spent, gives you all the guidelines for using the tourist tax. Jackie, feel free to jump in anytime -- MS. ROBINSON: Okay. I'll wait. MS. EICHHORN: -- you're comfortable. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I just -- I wanted to ask. Is there a functional reason to make the -- to state things as 100 percent of 1 percent for Category A and then 50 percent of the next 2 percent, because that's 1 1/2 percent? Why -- why is it broken out that way? MS. ROBINSON: It's broken out that way -- I can go into that once Jane finishes -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MS. ROBINSON:. -- if you don't mind, so I won't -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MS. ROBINSON: But I'll explain that to you when I come up there. There are taxes that are levied -- MS. EICHHORN: The next section in your pamphlet is the Tourist Development Council. That is the list of all the tourist development advisory committee. I put that in there because I wanted you, if you had any questions, to feel comfortable in calling the TDC members for any reason if they -- when your items go to them, you can call them, write them. M The last section in the book is the tourist development ordinance creating the Tourist Development Council. There's actually two ordinances in here. 92 -16 (sic) is a little further back, and 2000 -44. The 92 -18 is the original ordinance that created the Tourist Development Council. The Tourist Development Council reports Page 5 A 6JJ, their recommendations -- or makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. On 2000 -44, which is the beginning of that, we amended that to allow a rotation between Marco Island, the City of Marco Island, and the City of Everglades so that there would always be one member from each one of them rotating in the council. If there -- if Immokalee becomes the City of Immokalee and they want a city member on the board, then they will fall right into the rotation also of that, so there will always be someone representing them. If you have any other questions -- that's basically the pamphlet here. Jackie's going to go in with you the connection between your advisory committee, the tourist development committee, and the Board of County Commissioners, how you all fit together. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MS. ROBINSON: Good afternoon. It's nice to appear in front of all of you this afternoon. For the record, I'm Jacqueline Hubbard Robinson, assistant county attorney for Collier County. In your handout, you have a little bit in there. You have a copy of Florida Statutes 125.0104. If you could find that, it would be helpful. Now, to answer the question of the gentleman regarding why we separate the -- the 100 percent of one tax and then a portion of another tax, this statute allows a county to impose, first, a 1 or 2 percent tourist development tax. Collier County imposed a 2 percent development tax. Then after three years of imposing that tax, the county can impose a second one -cent tax, which Collier County also did. And when the one -- the additional one -cent tax is imposed, it's imposed for a specific purpose. And in this case it was imposed for beach restoration and cleanup and that sort of thing, so it's limited in its use to just beaches, so 100 percent of that tax must all -- always be dedicated to -- to the beaches in Collier County. So you'll always see 100 percent of the 1 percent tax and then a portion of the 2 JUJA41 percent tax because they're actually two separate taxes. Okay? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Uh -huh. MS. ROBINSON: And that's provided in the statute on page 2 of 23 in the handout I gave you at the top in subparagraph D. And what Collier County has done, it has taken the state statutory scheme that's set forth in this handout and adopted it to Collier County in the Ordinance 2001 -31, which is an amendment of the original ordinance. And I believe you have a copy of that. Is that in the handout? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. MS. ROBINSON: No. I -- I mean our county ordinance. That should be in the handout also. The important purpose -- the important section of this ordinance, for your purposes especially, would be where you've already been discussing which is the -- the plan. The state statute requires -- and that's -- on the second page of the ordinance you'll see tourist development plan. Under the state statutory scheme, the county must develop a tourist development plan, and it's sort of like a charter on how you send these tax revenues. And these revenues can only be spent pursuant to the plan, and the plan must be consistent with the statutory uses of the tax. Category A is the category of uses that pertain to this advisory board, and that is defined as beach park facilities, beach improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration, and erosion control, including pass and inlet maintenance, shoreline protection, enhancement, cleanup or restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is a public access. Now, 100 percent of the 1 percent tax is dedicated to Category A. So there are a number of things that can be done under Category A as they pertain to beaches, but only those precise matters really -- these are the only matters for which that 1 percent of the tax can be spent and 50 percent of the 2 percent of the Page 7 Jul Oij, tax. So all of the duties of your advisory board should pertain to the Category A uses of the tax. Now, under the ordinance that created your board -- and I don't know if you have a copy of this ordinance or not, but it's 2001 -3. If you don't have a copy of the ordinance, we will certainly provide you with a copy, the ordinance that created the Coastal Advisory Committee. MR. GRAY: I think we got that the first meeting. MR. MUDD: The first meeting we gave that to them. MS. ROBINSON: Good. In Section 1 it sets forth why you were created, and in Section 2 it tells you what your functions are. Essentially you were created to assist the Board of County Commissioners in the methods by which it will establish beach erosion control and inlet management programs within all of Collier County, whether incorporated areas or unincorporated areas. Section 2 sets forth the functions of your board. The Tourist Development Council, which is the council essentially that you will make recommendations to, has the overall responsibility for advising the county commission on how to spend all of the tourist development tax funds according to a plan that was adopted with their recommendation. But this board is limited to the Category A expenditures, and so your function basically is to advise the Tourist Development Council of how those funds in Category A should be spent. And I think it goes without saying that the maintenance and preservation of the beaches in Collier County are of the utmost importance to everyone that lives here and -- and to the whole country, really, because the beaches are so unique and incredibly beautiful. And so your task is a very heavy one in terms of the responsibility that's being placed upon you. So in that Section 2 there are five sections of duties and Jul 641 responsibilities of your board. And -- and so you would have to identify certain areas of the beaches and determine where money should be spent in erosion control, try to develop a program of long- term erosion control, because that is a major problem, by the way, in Collier County, which I'm sure you're -- you're very familiar with that. Marco Island in particular is having a tremendous problem with beach erosion, and the county has implemented a number of plans in an attempt to -- to actually resand the beaches. But this is an ongoing problem, so that's one of them. The second one is prioritizing capital improvement plans. There is, as you know, a ten -year plan for capital projects pertaining to the beaches, and I think that those have been -- I've been told that you've been made aware of what those are also. So you're fairly familiar with the projects that the public utilities department intends to implement as they pertain to the beaches. And those will come up, and new ones will be presented to you, and you'll have to make a decision on whether to recommend the implementation of those to the TDC. The TDC will then examine those and -- and -- and rely, to a large extent, I would presume, upon your recommendation and then make a final recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners on how these funds should be spent. So this is an attempt to enlarge the input on these issues by forming the board that you're a part of. Second -- thirdly, there may be other regional and statewide groups that are performing a similar function as you are -- as you are performing, and our job as staff will be to bring this information to you to see if you want to coordinate any of your activities with other regional organizations or statewide organizations who may have the same purpose, that is, beach restoration and erosion control and beautification, which is your major duties. Four, you are -- you have the responsibility of helping the Page 9 Jun126. J1 5 county outline its coastal zone management policies, which will obviously have a long -term, long -range effect on the status and state of Collier County beaches. Five -- finally, innovative proposals will be presented to you from the staff and also from the public at large. So this is -- this is the -- the task as it's been presented to us, and as it's being presented to you today. So you have a monumental task. You have a tremendous amount of responsibility in terms of advising us, Collier County staff, on how we are to proceed in maintaining the beautification of our beaches. Are there any questions? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Go ahead. MR. PIRES: Can I? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Sure. MS. ROBINSON: Tony? MR. PIRES: Jacqueline -- good afternoon. How are you? MS. ROBINSON: -Okay. MR. PIRES: Good to have you here in front of us. MS. ROBINSON: Thank you. MR. PIRES: Just one question on the functions and duties and roles of -- of this advisory committee -- MS. ROBINSON: Uh -huh. MR. PIRES: -- in Section 2 -D, which was the fourth, sort of, category of -- of the advisory role of this coun -- committee, in the last two lines mentions outlining the coastal zone management policies and coastal and estuarine habitat protection and restoration. Now, do we end up getting involved in any of the processes? Say the county was to go back through the process of reevaluating the Comprehensive Plan and some of its elements, including the conservation and coastal management element. Do we have an advisory role with regards to that? Do we have an advisory role with Page 10 JA Oil any Land Development Cbde regulations that have impacts on the beach and estuary and coastal areas such as the recent vehicles -on- the -beach issue that came up during the last round of the Land Development Code? MS. ROBINSON: Right. On this -- MR. PIRES : I want to know how broad or how narrow the scope of that is. MS. ROBINSON: Well, you know, I -- I really believe that the possibilities exist for this group to have a role in those decisions. And I think the manner in which you will participate in decisions that appear to be zoning matters or whatever will depend on how this group evolves as tasks are brought to you. I would also think that if there are things that obviously concern you as a citizen and not as a - - you know, as an attorney but as a citizen of Collier County you would have the ability to bring those issues to staff to bring as an agenda item for your board. In other words, I think this is going to be an evolving process of exactly what you wind up doing. I don't see any parameters that limit your ability to participate in those issues. Those issues are obviously quite relevant to what you're -- you're doing here. But your main function, as I see it, is to determine, to a large extent, recommendations that will be passed on to the TDC. The TDC's function is a bit more limited in terms of what is set forth in the ordinance as to what it can and cannot do. And it primarily exists to advise the county on the expenditure of the tax funds. Your -- and which is pretty interesting that you raise this issue because the -- I don't know how you would exactly phrase it, but your task as set forth in the ordinance that created you is a bit broader in many ways than the ordinance that created the TDC, so it -- I think it's going to be an evolving process. MR. PIRES: Thank you. Page 11 Jui.4401 MS. ROBINSON: Are there any other questions? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: One question, just looking back how does -- how does the -- the enabling legislation for this committee compare to -- to the tasks that were undertaken by the beach renourishment committee which did similar things but then was replaced by this group? MS. ROBINSON: I'm -- you know, the beach renourishment committee existed, unfortunately for me anyway, prior to my tenure here in Collier County. I haven't been here quite a year yet, so I'm not very familiar with what they did, although my understanding is that their prior task was similar to -- to what yours are now. Am I correct with that? MR. MUDD: I would say -- Jon, you -- you've been on it longer than just about anybody, and I think you got a better handle on that one as far as that question is concerned. Go ahead. MR. STAIGER: Yeah. It -- they're comparable. The beach committee evolved into getting -- or -- or it -- it gradually got more involved in things that were somewhat astray from the original charge, which was to look at, you know, do we need beach restoration and, if so, how do we pay for it and what's the -- the logical way to accomplish it. And I think that's one of the -- one of the problems that the committee had is it got involved in -- in things that were sort of far afield, such as discussions of public access and the like, which are really not, you know, relevant to -- to the erosion control issues and how you address it. And initially the charge to that committee was -- was to look at, you know, is there a need for beach restoration and, if so, you know, how is it funded. And that was early on in the -- in the late'80s and early '90s before the tourist tax was set up. And -- and -- and then once the tourist tax was established, then the issue was -- was do we do it as a single -phase project, or do we phase it over time given the Page 12 ,UJfjd6J, -- the prognostications on revenue. And, also, they spent a lot of time looking at different technologies for doing -- doing the actual beach restoration project. And they settled on -- on the dredge and fill as being the most appropriate because of the need we had for a considerable volume of new sand in the system. And -- and they -- but they kind of digressed from that after the beach restoration project got completed in '96, and then when that rock in the -- rock -in- the -beach issue came up, they -- they spent a great deal of time arguing about the rocks. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, it sounds then like -- and partly because of the passage of time, there -- there were different mandates. They both related to the coastal line and all that -- MR. STAIGER: Yeah. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- but theirs was a specific activity, some of which was funded by TDC eventually, whereas ours is really taking an estimated availability of funds and determining how they'll be spent. MS. ROBINSON: Yes. And they will -- you will probably need to remember that it -- that information that you need, as it pertains to any of these issues, can be made available to you by Collier County staff. MR. ROELLIG: I might add also that we got involved in the -- the beach parking and that sort of thing, which I guess has now been -- now falls under the parks and recreation advisory committee -- MS. ROBINSON: Yes. MR. ROELLIG: -- whereas before we discussed that at the beach renourishment committee as far as parking structures and parking availability, access issues of that type. MS. ROBINSON: Right. I think the best -- you know, the best thing to do is to take your mandate which is brand new and fresh and just use that going forward and not be tied to what occurred in the Page 13 JuA61 J1 9 past. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Oh, certainly we will. I was just looking for a little context. MR. ROELLIG: I think we're focused here a little more on beach issues as opposed to whether or not there should be two, three stories of a parking structure or that sort of thing. MR. MUDD: I -- let me add just a little bit into this -- just a little bit in the process and -- everybody tried to do their best, no matter what the position was or no matter what the old committee was. They were doing what they thought was the best possible process. I will tell you that the Tourist Development Council won't do anything with your dollars unless you agree to it. Okay. That is the first thing in the budget this year. "What did the CAC say ?" And I said, "I really don't want you to approve this until they approve it or make it subject to their approval," and they did -- they approved it on Monday when I presented it, basically, as -- as you approved it prior to that. And the Board of County Commissioners did it subject to the TDC approving it subject to the CAC approving it. So I guess what I'll say to you is you have a big input. And if you, on a long -term plan, decide, hey -- and it -- that was a $4.7 million program, if you remember -- if you decide, "Hey, the projects next" -- "2003, okay, only require 3.2, but in 2004 we really need to go in there with 3 -- $3 million extra of what it is," you basically say, "Hey, this is why it's this way this year. And, oh, by the way, next year our plan says that it has to be significantly increased." And they pay attention to that process. And this way you won't get those dollars diverted someplace else, as long as you have a plan for that process. And -- and I'm not too sure -- and I might be speaking out of turn, and I don't -- I don't mean to cast a shadow on anything. But Page 14 Jul 641 I'm not too sure we were that forthcoming in the past to the TDC and to the program, okay. That -- that's just my take on it from what I've been told. And I think we have a bright future because if you can lay that plan out and that process and we can do the best we can with our crystal ball to foresee some things that need to transpire, I think we can do a load of good for Collier County with the dollars that we get that are allocated to us in this process. And -- and the ten -year plan that we -- that we put together, based on what you -- what the last beach renourishment committee had for a ten -year plan and -- and some other things that we've added, like putting more upland sand on the beach, when we put that together, we wanted to make sure that the new allocation of funds, you know, that 2 percent, the 2 pennies, what our percentage would be of that, we wanted to make sure that we had enough allocated to get the job done. And you still have some discretion, some movement in that process, and we'll talk about that a little more. But I really think you have a lot of power. I think there's a whole lot of people looking to this committee to -- to give them the direction on the projects that should be undertaken. And -- and there's no other organization out there, except special interests, that will tell you everything that they need yesterday that -- that's willing to put it altogether in that -- in that plan in order to lay that -- that function out. And it's a significant function. We're talking about $5 million worth of dollars that everybody wants, and -- and I -- I think it's a -- I think it's a pretty good charter. It gives you lots of latitude. If you wanted to talk policy and this committee had the -- was into the finesse side of, you know, what things should be built and where the Land Development Code's a little bit off, you've got -- you've got all the wherewithal to get into there and elbow it and say, "Hey, we don't like this because it doesn't make sense, and we want it Page 15 Jul 0 4�11 to be changed" and to go forward with that recommendation. And that would be -- I think people would be joyful if you'd do that, okay. They'd welcome it with open arms because nobody really gets into it except the special interests. And then the Board of County Commissions get bombarded by the special interests, and it's tough to figure out where the wheat and the chaff is and who's just giving you their side of the story. Then all of a sudden you pass it. Then you find out, well, that wasn't such a smart deal. And I think we've seen that a couple of times this year already where they've gone back and said -- after they've thought about it and said, "You know, we shouldn't have made that decision. And I think they'd look at a -- at a committee that had looked at that process, had looked at all the pros and cons to it, and -- and was willing to give their advice to the Board of County Commissioners; I think they would welcome that with open arms. MS. ROBINSON: Right. Miss Eichhorn just reminded me that the TDC is waiting for your input, and they will be relying quite heavily on your recommendations. MR. GRAY: I would like to add -- Bob Gray for the record. This is a new committee. We're in transition, and -- and we realize that. I think as we go forward we'll be a more proactive group, whereas to date we've been kind of a reactive group. But I think as we all get up to speed on what's going on with the beaches and what needs to be done and we may have public input to us as a committee, we'll become more proactive, whereas in three meetings we've been reactive. But that's fine. I mean, I think we all realize that we are in transition, and that's probably the only purpose we could serve during the last couple of months. MS. ROBINSON: I agree. Yes. MR. STRAPPONI: Miss Robinson, I have a question. Miss Eichhorn was certainly gracious enough to point out the TDC Page 16 Jul 0911, members with their phone numbers and extended an invitation for us to feel free to contact them at any time. My question is in regard to the Sunshine law; we were briefed on it last meeting. And I think I have a pretty good understanding on intercommunication amongst the committee members. I'd like to know how that Sunshine law impacts on intracommunication of -- intracommunication with other committee members. MS. ROBINSON: Right. You mean, for instance, your communication with the TDC members? MR. STRAPPONI: As opposed to members of the CAC. MS. ROBINSON: Yes. Well, the -- the Sunshine law obviously applies to both boards, and there's nothing to prevent you from conversing one on one with a member of the TDC board, since you're separate boards. If, however, you engage in a conversation with more than one member of the TDC or more than one member of this board with one member of the TDC, then you will be subject to the sun -- having your conversation open to the sunshine. And also, by the way, the Sunshine law prevents a serial kind of communication. So, you know, if you wanted to call one commissioner and ask their opinion on an issue that's going to be before them, then call another one and maybe tell that one what the other one said, it would still apply. So I would be cautious. There's nothing to stop you from talking one on one. But if there's more than two -- there's more than one, two of you, from either board, then you're going to be subject to the sunshine. And -- and -- and bear in mind that you're probably going to be under intense scrutiny anyway because you will be making recommendations on a very substantial sum of money each year that has to be spent so ... MR. STRAPPONI: Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions or comments? Page 17 JUJOij, (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you very much. MS. ROBINSON: Okay. You're welcome. Oh, and also, if you have any questions and you -- and you feel -- of a legal nature, please feel free to give me a call in the county attorney's office, and I'll be happy to help you out to the extent that I'm able to. MR. MUDD: Thanks, Jane and Jackie. The next -- subject to your questions, the next item on the -- on the agenda under No. 2 is the physical (sic) year'02 work plan, and - - and Roy's going to talk about that a little bit. MR. ANDERSON: Yes, Mr. Chairman and members of the committee. The -- as was indicated, the -- we -- we -- we did attend the meeting with the TDC on Monday, and we're happy to report that we got full approval of the entire $4.7 million that we requested for the FY '02. And I have a sheet, a handout here, just to summarize the -- summarize the changes. And they're all basically what we had discussed. There were four items which -- which were affected out of our total of 13 projects, if you recall. The first item, No. -- the first item was 280,200; that was the project management. That was the increase of sixty -six nine. The third item was the -- the sea turtle monitoring program. That had an increase of $5400. And the -- No. 5 was the -- the beach - cleaning operation, and that involved a reduction of $4100. In connection with that, you may recall there was also a question at our last CAC meeting whether there was double counting of a particular item, and we did check that, and there was no double counting. Those were two separate items which unfortunately have exactly the same dollar -- dollar figure, so just wanted to let you know about that. And the last item was the No. 13, the Clam Pass project. That had a decrease of $33,200 for a net overall bottom -line increase of $35,000. Page 18 JA 641 So the final as approved by the TDC and the CAC -- and, I might add, is consistent with the city's sub -- or the county's submittal to the -- to the budget -- budgetary process, the approved amount is $4,752,000. So that basically constitutes the -- the '02, FY '02, budget. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MR. PIKES: If I may, Mr. Chairman. Just real quick, Roy, on the Pelican Bay, the Clam Pass, is that Clam Pass monitoring and dredging together? MR. ANDERSON: Yes, it is. MR. PIKES: And I guess you mentioned a number of two oh two three hundred. Maybe it's just a matter of I'm suffering from having lots of different sheets. But I guess initially was that proposed- at two oh five one hundred? My sheet didn't indicate that. MR. MUDD: Two oh two three hundred. That's No. 13. And what -- what happened is we were able to get some of that work done this year. MR. PIKES: Okay. I have another sheet that was handed out at one of the meetings that has two oh -- the first handout, I guess, the first packet we had, it was two oh five one -- MR. ANDERSON: Okay. That was one of the -- one of the very early, early submittals. MR. PIRES : Then it reduced down to two oh two three hundred MR. ANDERSON: Yes. MR. PIKES: -- and then further because-- - MR. ANDERSON: That's right. MR. PIKES: -- from the activities done this fiscal year. MR. ANDERSON: That's right. Yes, yes. MR. PIRES : Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Anything else? Page 19 JUJ Oil (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. ANDERSON: The next item is the -- is the ten -year plan which was also submitted to the TDC. And this is basically -- as we described last meeting, it's -- it's kind of a reformatting of these basic projects. And we made -- we basic -- we've made the changes in this table to -- to reflect those projects, so it's pretty much as -- as discussed last month except now the total bottom line is -- for FY '02 it comes to nine million three ten nine hundred, and the total revenues are nine million three ninety -three eight hundred. That's the gray area down at the bottom which reflects the new change in the -- in the revenues we have to deal with. And then the rest running on out follows suit. So this is just primarily to update your information on the latest ten -year plan as approved by the TDC. MR. MUDD: Do you want to talk to them a little bit, Roy, about what's in those particular items? Here, use my sheet. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. MR. MUDD: A previous comment from the -- from the committee was, "Well, how does this relate to the budget, and where are those numbers at ?" And -- and what I had Roy and -- and Tom Wides, my -- my finance officer, do is to break those out a little bit. And he'll talk about them. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. The first item is the needs -- well, the first -- the first item, inlets, that's all fairly -- that's all straightforward. There's a one -to -one correspondence on the items on our list and -- and -- and these items. M But now it starts to get a little interesting when we get into B. B, beach renourishment, 1 -A, as you'll see on the sheet that Jim just passed out, that's a total of three fifty -one seven. And in terms of this translation, it's basically part of the sea turtle monitoring program which is D -3. You can just eliminate the D, and it's the third work Page 20 Jul Oil order, you know, the third item. It's the sea turtle monitoring portion of one oh seven five and the portion that relates to Collier County and Naples versus the entire area. And then we have CCBR -- BR which is the Collier County beach renourishment, D -8 or number work -- Item No. 8 for 244,200 for -- so that's the breakout of the three fifty -one seven. Any questions on that particular item? (No response.) MR. ANDERSON: If not, the next one was B -1 -B, which is the engineering monitoring for the City of Marco Island. And there we have Item No. 3 which corresponds to the sea turtle monitoring portion for Marco Island, which comes out to twenty -six nine. And then we have the Marco Island segmented beach mon -- segmented breakwater monitoring, No. 8, for $27,000. And then we have the Marco Island beach restoration for $75,000. And then we have breakwater -- MR. MUDD: That was ninety seven -- that was $97,900. MR. ANDERSON: 97,900, sorry. Then the next item is Hideaway Beach for improvements which relate -- it's $77,000. And then we have hydrogen -- or I'm sorry, Hideaway Beach renourishment, Item No. 9, for three thirty -five five. And that all totals six thirty -nine three, which is the number you'll see under -- under B -1 -B . And the last item is B -2 -B, the 954,100. And that's made up of the Hideaway Beach Item 12, the three twenty -six thousand, and the breakwater modifications for six hundred and twenty -eight thousand one hundred for a total of nine fifty -four. So that's -- that's kind of the cheat sheet for these -- these items that appear in your table. MR. MUDD: So, Chairman, when you asked me the question, "Well, how does that break down in those subtotals," when you asked, you asked a very complicated question very simply, okay, Page 21 JUJAJI because -- because they break out by monitoring and actual construction. And some of the totals -- for instance, if you look at -- if you look at No. 8 -D -2 in a -- in a previous sheet, it said it was $472,000, and you'll notice that that amount is divided in two places on that little crib sheet that we gave you, okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Uh -huh. MR. MUDD: So we owed you that, as far as coming back to you because of the question. And we had to do some research, and we've had Harry come in. Harry's not doing real well. Harry Huber is recovering but very slowly. He's on limited duty. We get to see him. He's doing work at home. Keep him in your prayers. He doesn't look real good so -- any questions on the -- on the 10 -year breakdown on -- or the 10 -year plan and how that breakdown came about in 2002 and how it firmed up against the budget? That's what we tried to show you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any questions? MR. ROELLIG: I don't know if this applies specifically. But one of the questions I had earlier was -- or the previous meeting, we had projects that were approved in prior years. Apparently the money was set aside. For instance, the Parker sand webs project. Will we get some update information on that? MR. MUDD : What we're going to do is try to let you know where we are on this year's project list. And I wanted to get back to the sand web issue with you and get your particulars so we could get back -- get back with Harry, okay, and say, "Okay, Harry. Where is that in that process ?" But what we've done, in -one of the old business things -- and I think it's -- I think it's -- it's a good time to -- to give me the updates on the program. And let me get those to you. Then we can talk about where this year's program is -- it was going to be under old business, but you asked the question -- and see if we can get an answer. Do you want Page 22 JUJAJA me to take your only copy? MR. ANDERSON: No. That's okay. There might be some blank sheets in between there. MR. ROELLIG: This is kind of a explanation for other members of the committee. For a period of years, we've had projects that apparently were funded somewhere in the past and for permit reasons or other reasons weren't accomplished, and I guess the money is in escrow somewhere. So what I'm trying to develop is how many of these are out there in escrow and what kind of money were -- we're talking about -- about and what the probability is of some sort of a schedule on how these are going to work out. of MR. PIRES: Dave, are you saying you're thinking that part the monies not expended might be in that cash carryforward? Is that what that is? MR. MUDD: Okay. The question was, do you think it could be in the carryforward member -- from one of the -- the committee members. And -- and I would say to you, yes, it is. And what happens, Harry, the way he sets up the projects, he puts a brand -new project number on that project every year, so he doesn't keep the same number going from year to year. He puts a particular number to that process. So when you asked the question about the webs, that has a separate project number. We go in and check the project, figure out what the funds are and what was allocated and what's going on with it. And that's why I want to get into the specifics that you got in the questions. What I tried to do is take a look at this year's program, okay, and give you a -- a status of this year's program on this -- on this sheet. We have the dollar figures to back that up in the process, but I asked Roy today -- I said, "They've asked some questions about it in the past. We need to be able to tell them where we're sitting on this year's program. And then if they have questions of -- in a particular Page 23 J16401 nature about a project, we'll go back and research that a little bit." and now that I've got Harry back from the hospital, I can at least call him at home and start digging through the boxes, because we've given him his library. It's by his bedside. So it's it's working. But go ahead, Roy. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But in principle, if monies aren't spent, they're not lost. MR. MUDD: No, no, not at all. They -- not at all. You -- you continue to have them in those project categories, and you can -- and you can get at them because they were approved to be done. You'll get -- you'll get -- in some terminology that you'll remember, you'll have savings and slippage, okay. And savings is when an estimate -- you put an estimate on a project but it bids lower, then you have a delta that day -- that delta is savings, and you'll also get slippage, which you'll slip into another FY or one after that because of a permit issue. We did everything we were supposed to; we did our biological opinion, biological assessment; Fish and Wildlife didn't like a particular aspect of it, tells us to modify it. Then all of a sudden it takes us out of the sea turtle window or the absence of sea turtle windows where we can do any beach restoration. And then you have to push it off into the next FY because you get your permit. You might find that your permit -- they don't like an incidental taking. And -- and so we might have to do something different during a particular time of the year so that you don't have that problem. For instance, right now we're doing Hideaway Beach dredging, and you probably saw that in Sunday's paper. And Mr. Humiston was -- was quoted significantly in that paper on the article about one turtle that got stuck on a pipe during high tide and was -- and by the time it got to be low tide the turtle was basically stuck on the thing and was doing a teeter - totter dance. But in the process of doing the teeter - totter dance, she had dropped 13 eggs. Okay. Well, our folks Page 24 164,11 went there. Marla, the sea turtle person, okay, that came to speak to you before, went out there as a good samaritan and picked up those eggs and -- and buried them. And everything's okay, and we got the turtle back in the water. So we didn't really do a taking, and there was no harm. We just had a turtle that was stranded. And when you're 250 pounds and you're dancing on a round pipe, you have a problem, and that's what basically was happening in there. But Fish and Wildlife was a little slow with that permit, oh, by the way. That biological assessment, in contacts that I had with the local fish and wildlife office, was supposed to be out at the end of November. We didn't get the approval for that thing until March, early April, and that was after weeks of calling, and -- and it had everything to do with being overworked, or at least that's what the other end of the phone was saying to me. And so the reason we're into turtle season during that project is because they were a little slow at moving pieces of paper. We should never be in this predicament right now that we're in the middle of sea turtle season doing a dredge event. It could have been prevented. And I think in large part that's why they weren't very outspoken about our activities. They being that agency weren't very outspoken about our agencies because part of the reason we're out there right now sits squarely on their chest because they got us there, and it wasn't -- and it wasn't very good timing. So -- so in our defense, we're doing everything we can so we don't harm the turtles, and we're staying away from nests and things like that. But you've got to be able -- you've got to be able to understand that there will be some slippages with projects, and we won't lose the dollars. Those dollars will be there. We just need to make sure that we do the carryforward paperwork. We have to identify to the Board of County Commissioners as the FY ends and goes into the new FY what dollars we want to carry Page 25 Jul oi�ji over into those accounts into the next physical (sic) year. If we don't identify those categories of dollars, those dollars get taken out and get put into the reserves. And then it takes another thing where we said, 'loop, made a mistake, we need to bring that stuff back out of reserves and bring it on." You see it all the time in the Board of County Commission meetings. The best way to do it is, if you plan to spend it, you have slippage, you identify it so that you just keep the money in those accounts and you let them know as the FY ends. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, at the next meeting or the meeting after, I think an inventory of that would be interesting for us, even though we don't actually have to do anything about that. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. ANDERSON: Yeah. I'd like to just go over this handout for FY '01 projects. Just -- I should mention that the FY '01, the county goes on a -- on an October 1 st to October 1 st fiscal year, so when we're talking about FY '01, that means -- that means October 1st of 100 through the - September 30th of'01. The first item here is produce and stockpile sand. That was a contract with Bonita Grande Sand Company for the 50,000 cubic yards. This is our recurring annual contract, and that was terminated or completed last year. That would have been completed at the start of the sea turtle season or about May 1 st. So that -- but that -- that still was within this current fiscal year, so that -- that was -- that's why it's included. MR. MUDD: If you remember, the Bonita Grande sand had -- had a calcium content to it that when you put it on the beach and it dried up, it left a crust. You probably saw that in the paper. We terminated that contract and came to a settlement here in the last month or so with Bonita Grande for $10,000 because they basically charged us for the space that they were stockpiling the sand that no longer passed the Florida Department of Environmental Protection JUJ4401 standards. So we never really got to use all of it. At the time that it was purchased, it passed FDEP's, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, passed their requirements. But when they had a different employee come on board, there was a new standard that was applied. And it -- and it -- and, oh, by the way, when we put it on the beach, it wasn't the right stuff. I have to admit it reacted with the saltwater, and it reacted to it in a negative way. It wasn't nice, fluffy sand. Then it turned more like hard pan again. We had to tell them it's like a concrete piece to it that there's no way to determine unless you take it through a -- a chemical analysis, and that's what the Florida Department of Environmental Protection did. When they identified that, we didn't use the sand. We stopped, and we finally came to settlement and closed and terminated that account. Sir. MR. STRAPPONI: Chairman, real quick question. How long did it take that sand to develop that crust? MR. MUDD: As soon as it was placed, as soon as -- as soon as the air hit it after the water hit it, whew, it started to cake. MR. STRAPPONI: And how many square yards had we laid down when we realized that? MR. MUDD: I wish I had that answer. Jon, can you help me? MR. STAIGER: Yeah. They -- I don't recall exactly, but they had put -- they had put some of it at the beach hotel, and they had put some of it up close to Doctor's Pass. And I think it was probably less than 10,000 yards. I don't recall the exact figure. The -- the carbonaceous material over time washes away--so that the beach is now in better shape. It was just that it -- it stayed crusty, which some people liked because it was easy to walk on. But it was -- it was not appropriate material, and the -- and the -- the crusty nature of it made it troublesome to the people who are concerned about turtle nesting. And the original material from that source of sand met the spec Page 27 jo,il pretty well, and somewhere along in the process of mining it, they -- they either ceased washing it or short -- put some kind of shortcut in their washing process, so that stuff stayed in the sand. And I think that was part of the problem. But it -- where it was placed, we -- we didn't try to excavate it off again. We left it. And it's -- it's weathered now to something that's much more acceptable . MR. MUDD: Yeah. Al, you go -- Al Madsen's sitting next to Jon. He's -- he's our beach inspector. Al, on those two areas, are we having problems with the sand, or is it turning flaky now or -- MR. MADSEN: It's starting to fluff up nicely. There is no -- no problem in the area. I think it's -- it's turned out okay. It just was very uncomfortable for a while when it was first placed. MR. STRAPPONI: When we get this upland sand and if it meets the spec, have we in the past or do we intend to in the future maybe laying down a small test patch area to see how it reacts with the saltwater or -- apparently that had met the spec, and so we purchased it and found out it didn't meet the spec. MR. MUDD: Yeah. We've gotten a lot more sophisticated in our sand purchase since that time. We just -- on one of the projects down here with Jahna Industries soil, we purchased 50,000 cubic yards and went through excruciating methods to make sure that it met the specs. They dumped two or three truckloads out at the point where they were going to do renourishment, and we -- and the beach renourishment council, the City of Naples, went out there, and they even had a split vote out there, okay, when I was out there that day and went out to look at the sand that actually existed versus the sand that's there, felt it, touched it, put it by the water, see if it would crust, and -- and looked at the gradations and things like that. And oh, by the way, we had an impromptu public meeting, and - - and we got a lot of public there that day, people that live there, and they made their comments known to the committee. So it was a Mm ,un1A, J I pretty good meeting. And we had the reporters there and everything else. And it was probably the day you -all got to see my bald spot. But we were out there touching it, and the committee was out there too. What we'd like to do this summer is we'd like to go out with an indefinite delivery and definite quantity contract for about three soil -- or sand producers, upland sand producers, and put them on multiyear contracts, give them a minimum level that we -- we would like to get and a maximum amount that we could get from any particular year and bid that out and have multiple sources that we get to look at, FDEP gets to sample and take to their labs to make sure it meets -- and, oh, by the way, they'll do anything we want in this particular case just so we don't make more work for them with rocks on the beach or sand that crusts up, okay. So they would like to help us and -- and do that and have those readily available for us so that when we get around the sea turtle nesting periods in the fall and in the spring, we're able to get those particular quantities and move them. And then if one of the suppliers has trouble -- and that's what happened with Jahna. We -- there was -- there was a discussion between two levels of sand, one of which they could produce at the 50,000 quantity, but it was missing some of the fines, okay, the very, very small pieces to it, and -- and that was a contentious issue, especially for Mr. Bow -- Boggess at the time, as I remember, and -- and the other -- and the other sand -- and they could produce both. But the ones with the fines would take a lot longer, and in the quantities that we wanted, 50,000 cubic yards, it would take them all year to make it, okay, and we wanted it in 45 days. Well, if you want it bad, you get it bad, and we wanted it bad. And what -- to preclude that from happening in the future, you need to have multiple sources that are identified under contract so it's being stockpiled so if somebody is having problems mining it and Page 29 ijojol washing it and having it right -- available in the quantities you need, you got another source that can take some of that off. So we plan to do that this summer, get those out and -- and bring those by this committee to make sure that you approve and show you what it looks like, try to do it in baggies and things like that that you can see it and, as we take it up there, make sure you get the results from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. And when we get the go- ahead, then we can award the contract. But you'll sample it before we ever get into any contracts, as far as that's concerned. But I'd like to have that happen, one of those long -range processes we're talking about so that we get it. Right now the Jahna contract is -- is pretty much -- it says 3 percent on the piece of paper or underway or something, but we haven't got the bills back. But we put 41,000 cubic yards of that stuff on the beach up -- up on Park -- is it Parkview? MR. STAIGER: Park Shore. Park Shore. MR. MUDD: Park Shore. I'll get the names of these places. Park Shore, and on Hideaway Beach, and we still have 9,000 cubic yards that we have to put out on the beach, and we kept that kind of in reserve pending the hurricane season, where if we had a severe erosion problem in one of them, then we could -- we could go for the permit, if we didn't already have one, in order to -- to fix it fast. But we need to get additional sand sources identified and producing so that we're raring to go. In that ten -year budget, you always have as a minimum five -- 50,000 cubic yards. And as the years progress, especially around 2006, 2007, we start getting into 75,000 cubic yards. And then by the end of your ten -year period of time, we're placing a hundred thousand cubic yards on the beach. And you're saying why? Because in the last event in '96 we shorted -- the project, when it was completed, Page 30 JUJO�JJ4 didn't do the complete process. And there were several feet, 35, I think, total as far as the beach extension was -- that we didn't get done. And -- and so there are parts of the beach that aren't -- they're -- they're not at their approved width, okay. And so we've got some work to do. MR. GRAY: So far as -- as that project that we just completed this past spring is concerned, I was involved in that. And, yes, we did inspect it. And -- and, of course, their sands were presented, and they did get approval from the state and from local authorities. But it always -- I always wondered in my mind, as they mined this, this inland source and they trucked it in, did -- did we or did the county staff have some way of monitoring what they were producing and bringing here on a continuing basis to make sure that all the way through we were getting what we thought we were getting? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. We -- we did. And every time it was delivered, I had Al sitting on the -- on the receiving end to make sure that they weren't giving-us a bunch of shells or rocks that was intermingled in the loads, and it was of the same consistency. And we watched it really hard. That's one of the reasons we want to bring another PM on board. And it's in the budget to go from a PM -III to a PM -I, and plus you got an inspector. You get more eyes on target, and you can see it at the source and at the other end. What we've got right now is -- we're spot - checking. MR. GRAY: Well, that was one of the things that went wrong in '96. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. STRAPPONI: Jim, is it my understanding that the 50,000 square yards that you stockpile -- and I understand that amount will increase to seventy -five, a hundred. Is that more or less in escrow so that if our upland source all of a sudden doesn't meet spec we don't stop the project, we have a stockpile that we can -- Page 31 Jujk, 411 MR. MUDD: That's what I'm trying to get at with multiple sources to give us some flexibility. Right now we are on a single source -- and -- and we're -- you know, we need it within a certain period of time and produce it all. That's -- we found out this last time -- lessons learned. You've got to be smart -- that they couldn't give us the sand of the specification that we wanted in particular in the amount of time -- we wanted it in 45 days. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Pardon me. MR. MUDD: I'm sorry. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I thought you were done. Is your question whether or not it's a contract to deliver or whether the sand physically exists in the minimum quantity? MR. STRAPPONI: I guess I was asking if we were stockpiling escrow in that 50,000 square yards so that if a contract to deliver, if they start delivering us something that's not unacceptable, it doesn't shut the restoration down, we have the stockpile that we can continue it. MR. MUDD: That's why we're going to do the multiple source where we give a minimum quantity in a year and what we'll take for them, and we'll also tell them what the maximum quantity is and do it multiple year so they can stockpile and they can hold it for us so that when we need it we've got it. And if we want more of it, then -- then what our partic -- if we have an emergency, then we can go in there and get it from them. That's the -- that's the way to do business in this particular case. Once it's been approved and it's there and we've inspected it and we sample it and if it's stockpiled for -- we sample it again on a quarterly basis or whatnot to make sure that something hasn't gone astray with it, and -- and put some checks and balances in the process, I think we can do a whole lot better and have a lot more flexibility. From what I understand, we -- we -- we pretty much limited Page 32 KMO-11 ourselves -- well, we haven't done any major beach renourishment until this year, and we limited ourselves to the springtime event. You've got another 45 days you can deal with. You got a total of 90. Why limit yourself to just the springtime? And -- and normally after hurricane season you have some beach erosion, so you might as well have it standing by. MR. ROELLIG: I'd like to add also that I want to emphasize that -- I think that's why we need the additional employee, because in any given sand pit, as they move around the pit to -- and go to various depths to obtain the material, you can go from acceptable to unacceptable. So that's just something that we've got to keep our eye on all the time because that can happen in any pit. So if there's something that -- stay ahead of the curve on. MR. ANDERSON: If we could go back to the list. Oh, by the way, I just received some information that the project that you mentioned, the Parker -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Park Shore. MR. ANDERSON: No. The Parker sand web that Mr. Roellig asked about, that is included under the FY '01 on the big sheet under 2 -A, the $1.923 million. So that's -- which is part of this fiscal year. So that is in progress, so that's where you'll find that is within that -- that amount. MR. ROELLIG: That's in this fiscal year, but it won't be accomplished until the next fiscal year. MR. ANDERSON: Well, we're getting it ready to get to -- but it's -- yeah. It will probably carry over. The work itself will carry over to next fiscal year. MR. ANDERSON: But the money will be obligated, and the project will start this year. It will continue into next year. MR. GRAY: That will be a slider. MR. ROELLIG: Right. Well, I guess the reason I just was Page 33 JJ4�iox curious about that, whether or not we have all the permits in hand now, or we're ready to go basically on that one? MR. STAIGER: We -- we have the -- we have submitted back to DEP the signed easement for the submerged land that the thing will occupy, and that's the last piece. When that gets signed at DEP, then they will issue their permit, and the corps will issue its permit. We -- the permits are ready to go. That was the last thing, which the mayor signed last week and -- so I will imagine we'll have the permits in hand within the next month. We're ready to go. MR. ROELLIG: As I understand, that we will -- we will -- this notice of procedure will be at the end of sea turtle season basically. MR. STAIGER: Yeah. They will start probably beginning of November. MR. ROELLIG: Right. Okay. MR. MUDD: One of the things that's interesting, unlike the P lace that I came from where the congressmen like to have flexibility with their appropriations, they can start a project in multiple years but only appropriate the money every year, and they don't have full funding for projects. And when it did happen about a couple of years ago, everybody threw a fit, and they changed it back to the old way. Collier County does it full funding up front, so when you obligate, that's when you -- that's how we carry the books. When you obligate it to cut contract, the money's got to be available. Even though the execution might be in the next year, once it's obligated, I don't have to go through the paperwork and say it's a carryover because it's obligated in that FY and, therefore, the dollars move automatically. And it's a little bit different than the system I'm used to, but -- but it's okay. I feel a whole lot better about this system than the other one because you were always praying, on the come, and you have to go talk to your congressman in order to get the dollars. MR. ANDERSON: The next item, No. 2, is our basic sea turtle Page 34 monitoring program, and that's continued monitoring being performed by the natural resources department, and that's in its continuing status. It's continuing ahead. The next item, Hideaway Beach T -groin repair and modification of five existing T- groins, that's just about completed, 95 percent complete. We do have a monitoring report handout -- we do have a monitoring report that we can hand out. It's right in that box there. The next item, Collier Bay entrance dredging, that's design, permitting, and construction activities. That's actively ongoing. It's about 60 percent complete as we speak. It should be finished up next month. Number 5, transporting and placing sand, this, again, refers back to the project which was completed in April 30th of last year. That's related to the Item No. 1. Six, beach cleaning operations, this is our standard beach cleaning program that we -- we have every year. Number 7, related beach cleaning equipment, this is the equipment that we purchased this past -- this year. It's two tractors, a beach rake, and a pickup truck. So that's all purchased, and it's just about all expended. Number 8, be -- beach maintenance, that's our routine beach maintenance, dune maintenance, beach tilling, miscellaneous maintenance of the beach profile as necessary. And that's about 40 percent complete. Number 9, the annual monitoring, this is the monitoring of the Collier County beach restoration project as required by permit conditions, and that's a continuing effort. Hideaway Beach T -groin maintenance, that project's just starting, monitoring of the existing T- groins pursuant to permit conditions. That's about 10 percent complete. Marco Island breakwater, annual monitoring of the segmented Page 35 iuiojol breakwater performance, and that's about 25 percent complete at this time. Producing and transporting and placing sand, No. 12, this is the contract we were just talking about where we did Park Shore and Hideaway Beach. And that's completed. That was completed as of May 1 st. And we have a monitoring report to pass out to you also that was prepared by our consulting engineers. MR. GRAY: While -- while we're waiting, I'll just ask a question: The new sand that was put at Park Shore and at Marco and Hideaway, was that completed satisfactorily by the contractor, and have they been paid in full, or is there anything that's outstanding there? MR. ANDERSON: No. To my knowledge, from talking with Harry just this morning, that's -- that's pretty much complete. I believe there is an issue of a possible change order there. He did mention that, but I don't have any specifics on that. MR. MUDD: They still have 9,000 cubic yards that are in a stockpile. We paid for the whole 50,000. It's sitting there, okay. And we still have an outstanding with the truck company that needs to haul it. They haven't finished hauling all 50,000, so they haven't charged us for the last nine. MR. GRAY: But everything else went according to the way we expected. The quality of the sand was okay, the quantity and -- MR. MUDD: Absolutely. And what I'd -- what I'd ask Al to do for me is to -- when I -- when I give you the e -mail addresses of these gentlemen, what I'll -- what I'll do is, you did a report for me on that sand placement, okay, to show you the before and after effects. It's a really good project, and I think it's enlightening. He'll give it to me, and I'll -- and I'll ship it to you. It's a -- it's a -- he did a very good job putting it together as far as the before and after and the exact quantities that were put there. But Page 36 Jul Oil Al could tell you a little bit more. But from -- from the staff standpoint, they did a really good. MR. GRAY: My view is that they did a good job too. I live there on the beach, and I -- I watched it, and I felt like that we got what we paid for. But I didn't know what your -all's perspective was. MR. MUDD: Right. It -- it was good. We would have liked to have a little bit more time. Maybe we wouldn't have that 9,000 cubic yards left. But we ran into turtle season, and that was part of the reason that we had it. I was a little dissatisfied with the trucking firm because they bid it, but they didn't have bond, okay, and they -- and they forced us to - - to do -- they forced us to do a lot of over -- I call it overtime. They condensed the time period to place it a lot shorter than I would have liked it to be because they didn't have the bonding issue done. And - - and it forced them to deliver -- I think they did some Saturday work, too, Al. MR. MADSEN: Yes, sir. MR. MUDD: But we pushed them hard to get the quantities out there. I would have wished they would have had the bonding issue like they said they would have had. Again, we got ourselves into one contractor. We got ourselves forced into the line. Instead of having multiple options, we only had one. And, oh, by the way, they -- they -- they didn't have what they said they were supposed to, even a letter of credit, okay, that -- that rating that you need, they couldn't come up with it. So we -- we pushed them for about a three -week period of time. We did a lot of hammering and a lot of phone calls trying to get people to answer the question. And -- and really what happened, they changed the name. They went from -- it was Dad's ownership to the kids' ownership. And when they did that, they lost their bonding. They thought they had it at the time. Live and learn. Page 37 JUJ441 They got it done. They did a good job, but we learned a little bit on this last one too. We probably need to have a couple of trucking firms that are on the contract multiple year so that we can engage them so we don't get ourselves in a fix and we lose half of the 45 -day window. MR. GRAY: Did they -- did they get the bond? MR. MUDD: Yes, they did. We wouldn't -- we wouldn't let them carry unless they -- they were bonded. They got to hold Collier County harmless, and the only way to do that is to have that kind of issue. So, yes, they -- they were able to do that before we could let them start to haul, but we got ourselves in a bond -- a bind again. We got ourselves into a bond -- a bind again because we went -- we went with only one firm and didn't have some other options. MR. ANDERSON: Just continuing on the list: Thirteen, Hideaway Beach renourishment feasibility study for future renourishment of Hideaway Beach, that's a relatively new project just starting. And then I put on the bottom here No. 14, all the projects that we completed during this year were closed out: Marco Beach maintenance, Capri, Big Marco Pass inlet management plan, county beach study, Wiggins Pass management plan, and Caxambas Pass dredging. Those were -- were closed out this year. MR. PIRES : Mr. Chairman, not to interrupt the staff presentation, I have a three o'clock appointment downstairs, so I'll be leaving at about five minutes to three. And if this meeting is still ongoing after that, then I'll step back in if that's okay. I didn't want to just leave abruptly and think I had been offended by anyone. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. PIRES: Okay. (Mr. Pires left the room.) MR. MUDD: That -- that completes your update as far as the -- Page 38 J1441 the status is concerned. What I would like to do for next meeting is provide you the numbers that go behind -- go behind those issues so I can get you into -- just this backup information. I don't want to give you something to make your eyes glaze over, but we'll give you the backup data in that project. What I had was the main numbers. We'll have them updated so that I can give you that entire spreadsheet. It's your turn, Roy. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. If we're back on old business, I just wanted to -- the first item we put on there was the May 29th minutes approval. They are now available on the web site, so -- both -- actually, both previous minutes, the minutes from the May meeting and the June meeting that we had are now both on there. So if you -- and I did send out a little instruction sheet that you can use to go through it -- go through the -- to go through to get to the -- to the minutes, and -- and Mr. Pires had sent me some comments. He had gone through the May 29th minutes and found a number of typographical errors, and we're having our clerk -- the finance clerk who is responsible for the -- the program -- programming of that check out the problems with those minutes. But we had some 14 typographical errors in the minutes, and we're trying to get to the bottom of that. So -- MR. MUDD: And they basically boil down to it took the J in just and made it an L, okay. So they -- they were kind of X -rated -- no. I'm kidding -- so it turned into "lust." CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: The reporter with us today had mentioned to me before the meeting that there's apparently some kind of bug or something in -- in the software. I would think -- MR. MUDD: Well, what we'd like to do is to get the -- to get the committee to approve the minutes pending those changes, those typos as -- as part of the old business. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That's what I was going to Page 39 JUJ4,iol suggest that unless -- they're not really substantive in nature and we have a handle on the problem, that we have them corrected as a scribner's -type issue. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. MR. GRAY: I have a question on that. Is -- is this going to be our procedure in the future, to always have the minutes just available on the internet and not have a hard copy here at the meetings or at least mailed out to us as part of our packet before we have a meeting so that -- MR. MUDD: If you want -- MR. GRAY: Because some people might not have a computer. MR. MUDD: Okay. If you need them mailed, I'll mail them. MR. GRAY: I would prefer that. MR. STAKICH: I'd prefer it. MR. MUDD: Okay. We'll have that done. MR. STRAPPONI: Jim, I have a question. The May 29th minutes, I was able to download that and read through it and -- but the next site I had a great deal of difficulty trying to access it. I think you had problems, too, didn't you? MR. GRAY: Yeah. I did too, and that's one of the reasons why I would like to have a hard copy and have it in our packet before we meet each month because, you know, I love my computer, and I love all the stuff it can do, and I think it's great, but it's not quite there yet, I think, for something like this. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think probably -- I thought maybe it was just my connection at -- at the time, but I had the same experience. The June 7th minutes I don't think I ever got. If I got them, I probably, you know, gave up and it downloaded two hours later or something. It may have been just that site. I don't know. I'd like to get them on the computer, but that particular file, I think there's a problem accessing it. il Oil MR. MUDD: Why don't -- why don't we do this then: Why don't we hold on approving the minutes. Let us take all minutes from all three meetings now that we have, and we'll mail those out to you. And at the next meeting that we'll have on the 2nd of August we'll have all three mailed out to you ahead of time, and then you can approve them in the process. And then some folks that have been gone to Africa hopefully will be back and -- and read what he missed. MR. ANDERSON: They take about two weeks to -- to be transcribed, so it will probably be a couple -of -week time frame when we send them out. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. ANDERSON: Okay? MR. GRAY: That will be fine, as long as we get them before the next meeting. We did have a problem with our previous committee in that we would meet and we wouldn't have the minutes from the last meeting, and it was because of a backlog, I think, in the clerk's office. As far as- I was concerned, that was always a problem because I just don't think we were functioning efficiently unless at the meeting that we're at we have the minutes of the last meeting and, you know, that's just not according to Robert's Rules. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We should also as a procedural matter then probably take a motion, if anyone wants to make it, to continue the approval of the May 29th meetings until August 2nd. MR. ROELLIG: So moved. MR. GRAY: So moved -- second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All in favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It passes unanimously, that being at the moment, 510. Page 41 116401 MR. ANDERSON: The next item -- we talked about the work plans. The next item, Jim just handed out the financial disclosure form which was -- which was requested the last meeting. I did get this from the supervisor of elections so -- and it -- I spoke with the -- with the county attorney who indicated that because you -all are in a position where you're in the chain of approval of projects, it's necessary for you to -- to -- to fill this out. So it does have to be completed, and there are instructions in there. I think it's on page 2 at the bottom that indicates that it's to be submitted to the supervisor of elections here in Collier County. So it's -- so if there's any questions on that or any further -- you can call me at any time if I can help you with -- with that. MR. ROELLIG: Is this an annual submission? MR. ANDERSON: Yes, sir. MR. MUDD: Best -- best I -- MR. ROELLIG: I know they did it -- in the previous committee, I think I did-it once, but I don't know if that is -- MR. MUDD: Well, we'll find out. My -- my best read on this is it's an annual submission. MR. GRAY: I never did it at all. MR. ROELLIG: Oh, really? MR. MUDD: We won't say that, sir. MR. GRAY: Right or wrong. MR. ROELLIG: At the appropriate time, if we're prompted, we will be glad to do -- MR. ANDERSON: In terms of when to file, in the third column there it indicates (as read): "thereafter, local officers, state officers, and specified state employees are required to file by July I st following each calendar year in which they hold their positions." So it's apparently an annual filing. MS. ROBINSON: It is annual. Page 42 Jul 6 J1 I MR. ROELLIG: Pardon me? MR. MUDD: She just confirmed it is annual. It's always good to have an assistant attorney still with us. Back to you, Roy. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. Item 4, new business: TDC meeting of June 25th. That's, basically, just -- we -- we already covered that. That's pretty much a -- a summary of the approval process, the — we -- we indicated that we got the approval of the '02 and the 10 -year -- 10 -year program at that meeting. MR. MUDD: Now, the ten -year program was not up for approval. I want to correct something he said. It was given to them and explained to them as a working paper, okay, that -- that -- that -- that your committee would be using, okay, and changing as -- as time goes on. And that process, it was a snapshot. It was also used to make sure that the percentages with the new TDC ordinance was -- was going to be corrected, and that's how I portrayed that on Monday evening. I -- it was unanimous vote on -- on your 4.717 -- $4.732 million after the explanations were made to the changes that were different than -- than the report that I gave them on -- on 9 April. And so explained and passed. Again, they weren't going to do anything until -- until you approved it. And -- and they were so particular about it on 9 April that they said that they would accept it, okay -- they would only accept the draft without your approval on 9 April and that you had to approve it before they would -- it would come to them. So they were very, very particular about the verbiage they used when I gave it to them on 9 April. So I will tell you, they look to you for -- for that guidance and for those projects that need to be done in -- in Collier County, and -- and they're dead serious about it. They're very hesitant to touch anything without having gone through this committee. Now, I would tell you, if I can get the Board of County Page 43 JUJ6401 Commissioners to be this particular and -- and in the past I've heard them from the dais say, "Well, that's a project," and I think what we need to do is when that happens, say -- and you -- you have a -- you have a group that will do that, all you have to do is bring the project to their attention and let them evaluate it. So I'm trying to focus them back to you when it gets to project identification so that they don't start taking it upon themselves to pass it without going through the prop -- the proper committees. And we'll work on that. And in the past sometimes I -- I think the beach renourishment committee of Naples got a little frustrated, "Well, they'll just pass it anyway." I heard that one or two times in the meetings that I attended. And I'd like to focus it back down so that, hey, there is a -- there is a mechanism to bring those projects to bear where there is a good evaluation done and a prioritization of those projects on a -- on a complete list and what's good for the county as it goes forward. So I'll do my best, as I attend those meetings, to make sure that they focus that way, that nobody's -- nobody's particular charter gets usurped. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Very good. MR. MUDD: We -- we did hire a new project manager. Did you give them a resume or -- MR. ANDERSON: No. We'll send that out. MR. MUDD: -- a bio? I owe you a bio. The guy -- the gentleman's name is Ron Hovell. He's a 20 -year Navy Seabee, graduate of Annapolis, has lots of experience with dredging, beach restoration, and issues like that. Today he's still in the Navy, but when he comes here on 1 August, he won't be. We were lucky to get him, and it was -- it was -- it was a rare find, as far as -- as far as I'm concerned, because I looked at the other folks that -- that applied for the job, and by -- by far he was most qualified, best qualified, to be -- to be exact, and he was head -- head and shoulders over the rest. So 0-. ii1 Jul 64J, we're lucky to have him on board, and we'll get to meet him at your 2nd August meeting. So you'll see a new face. And -- and we'll do some transitions with Harry, if he gets -- even if he has to go to Harry's house and check him at bedside, but we'll do some good transitions with that process. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: As he gets -- as he gets up to speed with the new position, will he be the primary liaison -- MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: --with us? MR. MUDD: What I'm going to do -- and it's been kind of a transitional period of time. What I'd like to do in the -- in the future, the next couple of meetings, I'll sit here and help through the process. But I'd like to have Ron and Roy take this meeting on as the staff liaisons, and I'll -- and I'll watch them and make sure that process goes on to make sure that there is a good transition so that you're fully up and you get to see the same faces and I don't get pulled away because my buzzer goes off or whatever I just got. But you deserve better than that, and -- and I've got my hands on lots of stuff. So, yeah, I'm going to make sure that that happens. And he's dedicated. He's full time to that position. And there will be another PM -I and Al that are full time. They do nothing else but beach. And there is no other projects on their plate. Even their training is -- is tapped to TDC dollars and -- and their -- their benefits. So they're yours, and you should use them to your maximum extent. We want to have a first -class process, and we're bringing on first -class people to see that that happens. Now, Al did take a shot today in the editorial page. MR. ROELLIG: Letters to the editor, yeah. MR. MUDD: Yeah. In the letters of the editor, he took a shot. Now I -- in his defense, he wasn't going more than 4 miles an hour, and he stopped before he came to that family some 30 feet away and Page 45 J641 asked the -- the lady if she would be so kind to hang on to her kids while he passed. She didn't like that process too much. And -- and so he took a little bit of a un -- unnecessary shot in today's paper. But he -- he only -- he does the beach once a week, okay, to make sure he gets to see all the areas. He does Naples beach twice a week. And in this particular case he had to get a little closer to the water than he would have liked to because of a sea turtle nest. And that's where we got into turtles over kids in today's paper. And I think it was pretty -- an unfair shot. Now -- and -- and -- and Commissioner Henning did call that lady and -- and talked to her, and she said that the person, the county employee, was most kind and most courteous, and that's the way Al has always been, and -- but that didn't come out in the paper today. MR. ROELLIG: Surprise. MR. MUDD: But it's not us riding up and down on the beach doing -- doing those kind of things. He was doing his job, and he was being very careful about the folks that were there. So they are our -- they are your employees, your eyes and ears in -- in that process so ... MR. GRAY: Do I -- do I understand it right, the new man that is coming on, will he be taking Harry's place? MR. MUDD: Yes. MR. GRAY: Okay. MR. MUDD: Harry's -- this isn't an unstressful job. And you do take some -- you do take some heat in the paper and things. And Harry's health over the last year or so hasn't been -- hasn't been too good. I think part of it has to do with stress. Harry needs a break. I'm going to move him to some utility projects. He's done a good job. I just need to get him -- get him out of the stress -laden processes and -- to do that, and I think Harry deserves that. He's been a good county employee. He hasn't -- he hasn't done anything wrong that I Page 46 JJ4,JJ1 can -- that I can determine. He just takes -- he's been taking some unneeded heat. So I'm going to -- I'm going to move him on in my engineering division to do some utility projects, some water and wastewater projects, and the new gentleman will take over for beach. MR. ANDERSON: Yeah. There will be an extended transition between Harry and -- and Ron Hovell of probably two months, three months or more if need to -- because I've found, just myself, there's so much depth to the -- to this -- to this work, it really takes a long time to -- to grasp all the dimensions of it. MR. GRAY: His name's Ron Hovell? MR. ANDERSON: Yes. And when I send the minutes out, in that same package I'll also include the -- the resume of Ron in that package. MR. GRAY: Good. MR. MUDD: Subject to -- to your questions, I think we've gone down this agenda. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Uh -huh. We have a few members of the public here. MR. STRAPPONI: Excuse me, Mr. Chairman. I -- I do have a question for Mr. Mudd. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Sure. MR. STRAPPONI: Before I ask the question, I'd like to extend my sincerest wishes for a speedy recovery for Harry. I know you talk to him probably and -- my question: Apparently Lee County has just approved their first off -leash park for a waterfront area designated for pets. Has the public at large or has staff ever considered it, or does Collier County have anything of this nature? MR. MUDD: I'd have to check with Mr. Ochs who's the administrator for -- for public services, okay. I'll get it before I leave. MR. STRAPPONI: Okay. MR. MUDD: I -- I don't know of any. And the reason I don't Page 47 ,un126dd know, it hasn't hit the paper here in that process, but I'll -- but I'll check and get back with you at the next meeting to give you an answer yes or no. MR. STRAPPONI: Well, I raise the question because if -- if there has been any input from the public at large, you know, I -- I think I would like to know about it and have a look at it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'm virtually certain we don't have anything in the county now. We do have the so- called bark park but nothing on the coast. A few years ago -- and by that I mean maybe five years, six years -- there was a -- some thought to -- to doing a -- an off -leash section of the beach. And I don't recall if that was considered at the county level or City of Naples, and there was an outcry of what would happen and health risks and safety risks and all that. You never know if it's the -- certainly the most vocal people were against it. Whether -- whether the more people than not were against it or not, I don't know. And I'll never forget somebody wrote to the newspaper and said, "Well, if we allow this, what next? Elephants ?" And that kind of killed it. MR. STRAPPONI: Dr. Staiger, has it ever come up before the City of Naples? MR. STAIGER: Well, we have an ordinance in the city that says you can't have dogs on the beach. And I know that there are people who go out in the evening after the beach patrol has gone away and run their dogs in the water because some law -- some dogs love it but -- but it's come up periodically, and J think that the public - health concern has -- has always sort of put it to rest, but it's -- it's something that -- that does get asked for periodically. We are wrestling right now with an issue of a gentleman who trains or at least climatizes guide dog puppies prior to their actual guide dog training. And he's been trying to figure out a way that he can take ,, JunIA J I these dogs on to the beach so that they can get used to that environment and people without breaking the law. And I think he's sort of at an impasse with the city manager right now. But the -- there have been questions about dogs and horses. And I know people let their dogs run on the beach at Key Island, but, of course, you've got to have a boat to get there, which, of course, doesn't make it very accessible to the general public. But with -- that's one of the things that -- that your committee, I think, might very easily want to look at is -- is how much of a desire is there, and is there a way it can be done. If Lee County is going to do it, you know, perhaps they've got some guidelines that -- I know, you know, dogs like it so much, it's kind of a shame to deny it. MR. STRAPPONI: Apparently they have done it and got some positive press. I think most people like animals, even if they don't own one, and they thought it was a pretty good thing. MR. MUDD: We'll check on it. We'll get with Lee County. We'll check our ordinances and see what we have. And the next meeting we'll give you -- MR. STRAPPONI: Maybe if someone on staff could contact the people in Lee County and get their input. MR. MUDD: We will. No problem. MR. STRAPPONI: Thank you. MR. GRAY: I have a question: This may be better fitted under old business. But, Jon, I don't know if this is in your province or if this is in Jim's. The dredging at Doctor's Pass, has that contractor completed that job? MR. STAIGER: Yeah. The -- the sand dredging part of it has been completed, and he has taken his dredge and his equipment and gone to another job. The -- he retained a local contractor as a subcontractor to do the rock removal part of it, and that is underway now, and it's probably going to be underway for at least another Page 49 ,unl�dd month or so because there's a -- a fair volume of rock that has to be taken out of the bottom of the dredge cut out in the gulf. And they're basically doing it with a -- with a crane with a clam bucket on it, putting it on the barge, and then that material is being off - loaded on the south jetty at Doctor's Pass. And that's underway now. So the project is -- is in the rock removal phase, but it isn't completed yet. MR. GRAY: Did he complete the sand removal and dredging of -- according to the way it was expected to be completed? I know it was supposed to be done, like, last November. MR. STAIGER: Yeah. Yeah. He -- he completed the project to -- to the engineer's satisfaction. It just took him an extra 5 1/2 months to do it. MR. GRAY: Is he being hit for liquidated damages? MR. STAIGER: Yes. Yeah. We haven't really calculated all that yet. But most of the work that's been done by the engineer since December or so is -- is chargeable at -- at -- for liquidated damages because he had to supervise so much of the job. And we've had an awful lot of -- of concern from private property owners about propeller damage running into the dredge pipe and the like. So there have been a fair number of charges. But we'll -- we'll not reconcile that until they get the rock removal finished. MR. GRAY: Okay. MR. ANDERSON: I did want to just mention very briefly, if I could, that I did receive a copy from our consulting engineer on a monitoring report for the -- for Gordon Pass, and I'm prepared to pass that out to you, if you like, for your information. It's a -- it looks like a very nice report. And if you don't mind carrying any more bulk, I can give you -- give you that report if that's okay. MR. STRAPPONI: I'd like a copy. MR. GRAY: Uh -huh. I would too. Are -- there are any other projects -- I mean, we've talked about Page 50 JUIJ441 9 some of them here. I know they're kind of like ongoing. But I just was trying to think of other projects that were going on with our other committee, like the -- the rope project I call it? MR. ROELLIG: The sand web? MR. GRAY: The sand web. Is that -- is that supposed to be after sea turtle season -- MR. STAIGER: Yeah. That -- that will get underway -- yeah, that's Parker -- that's -- will be underway in the fall. And the other project that is -- is in the permitting process right now is -- is sand tightening the jetty at Gordon Pass. And that is -- the engineering work is being done right now by the adjacent property owner. So that's not being paid for by TDC. And the -- there was an estimated, I think, four or five hundred thousand dollars for the actual project. And it looks as though we will get at least half of that money from the state. The owner of the jetty is going to, I believe, deed the jetty over to the city so that it will become a public -- public structure. And in that case the state can give us some grant money for working on it. They -- they can't give the grant to a private property owner for -- for something like that. But that's in the process right now, and the state rep -- rep from DEP has been working with Harry on that. But that's -- that's one project that's -- that's still out there that we have the TDC grant for that. And I can't remember the exact dollar figure. MR. GRAY: And that -- that will be a part of this committee's -- this new committee's doings as we go forward. MR. STAIGER: Yeah. We will as -- the previous committee approved it and the -- the TDC and the Board of County Commissioners have -- have handled it all. But it will -- will -- as we get into the actual construction, we'll keep you aware of what's going on. That's part of the overall inlet management plan for Gordon Pass. MR. GRAY: Okay. Page 51 MR. STAIGER: Thank you. MR. MUDD: I had snuck that report into you already. You should have three reports: one with a green cover with some T- groins on it; one with a dozer. That's the -- that's the Park Shore beach renourishment. It's got all the picts on that e -mail, okay, that they have. And then there's the one that -- the first one I put out is Collier County Board of Commissioners, Hideaway Beach T- groins. Okay. So you had three reports. MR. ROELLIG: I have one item the committee might want to consider, and it depends on what the county's wishes are. The previous committee's meetings were televised by the City of Naples. I don't know if there's any interest or -- from the county or the committee as far as having these meetings televised. MR. MUDD: We can do that. I mean -- MR. ROELLIG: I don't -- you know, whatever -- if that's -- I just bring it up as something that was done in the past. It doesn't mean we need to do it now. MR. MUDD: Or we could -- we could do it -- MR. ROELLIG: It's something for us to think about. MR. MUDD: If there's a -- for instance, in the future if we decide to do, like, quarterly updates as far as how the projects are when we get a little more sophisticated and we start showing pics, pictures of that process, like on a PowerPoint or whatever, we might want to televise that particular one to let the folks know that the program's working. If you want it every meeting, we can -- we can make it available. It's not that hard to beam it up. I just have to get the allocation of time on the TV station. So I don't think it's an issue. And this room is set up to do that. MR. GRAY: I -- I would be in favor of it as long as we don't have performances for the TV camera. And I don't know how we control that, but some of you are laughing, and I think you know Page 52 JUJ OJOI what I'm speaking of, because it can be a problem. But I think the -- the work of this committee is important enough to the county that the public should know, and that's probably going to be the best way for them to know. I would be in favor of it. MR. MUDD: Yeah. I'm just -- if you want to do it periodically, if you want to do it all the time, and I think that's probably the -- the question -- or do you want to do it? But I think he's -- Mr. Gray has a point about grandstanding. You'll get some folks that will come in and grandstand and -- and, you know, look at TV land and say, "Hello, I'm here. Now, they're not listening to me." I've seen that a couple of times with the Board of County Commissioners, okay, and then you have to have due diligence to make sure that they stick to the subject and -- subject at hand and keep them focused and keep them moving. MR. ROELLIG: I think -- excuse me. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Go ahead. MR. ROELLIG: I-would think that maybe we might wait until we have more members of the committee and have a discussion on that some time. I don't think there's any big rush to start, but there are pros and cons to it. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I was just going to say it had occurred to me also -- I, too, I would think it would be a good idea, at least certainly when we really get geared up in the fall or whenever that occurs. The possibility of grandstanding exists with any televised meeting. And while it can occur, I don't believe it's that big a problem. I think that if these meetings are televised there are a topic -- it's a topic that concerns a lot of people. And if they're televised it'll make more people aware that we're considering various beach projects. I think it can be very beneficial. MR. MUDD: It's not -- it's not a problem. We can do whatever Page 53 Jui 0ji you like. MR. GRAY: It's a good source, too, for committee members to go back and see what we talked about. I have found that, you know, because they do have reruns. And I don't know if that's the purpose of the reruns or not, but it can be a very good source for -- you know, you walk away from a meeting like this and you wonder, what did we decide? Well, you can go back and take a look, and it's quite helpful. MR. ROELLIG: I have to admit that I have videotaped some of those, and it was helpful to -- certain things are fuzzy in your mind. MR. GRAY: Yes. MR. ROELLIG: The next time the next month comes back, you look at it. MR. GRAY: You don't need minutes that way. MR. ROELLIG: Well -- no. We need minutes. MR. ANDERSON: Mr. Chairman, would you like us to maybe put it on the next agenda as an item for -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Let's put it on for discussion, yes. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. Okay. Will do. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Now we've come to the time for public comment if we have anyone. Mr. Humiston. MR. HUMISTON: Ed Humiston with Humiston Moore Engineers. I just wanted to talk for a minute about the issue of constructing a beach project during turtle nesting season which Jim Mudd had alluded to as being an extremely important matter. As -- as he had said, it did cause the project that's under construction now to slide, actually, for more than a year that we've been working on trying to get the permits for this. But I want the -- the committee to understand that Collier County has their natural resources staff down on the beach at dawn every morning patrolling the beach. If there are any turtle nests in the area, they're relocated to an area where they Page 54 A 6JJ, won't be affected by construction. There's either a member of our firm or Al Madsen on the beach at all times during construction. The -- the contractor has been briefed and is constantly briefed and is, in fact, adhering very strictly to the permit conditions. He's being very cooperative adhering to those conditions to ensure that there won't be any injury to any endangered sea turtles. So although we do have the Fish and Wildlife document that has the -- what's known as the incidental take statement in it so that there would not be any legal problem if something did happen, I don't think anyone who is involved in this project anticipates there would be any injury whatsoever to any sea turtles. The incident that Jim Mudd had -- had alluded to was the turtle that got caught behind the pipe. What actually happened was the turtle crawled up the beach and crawled laterally down the beach until it found the place where it wanted to nest. It successfully completed its nesting. It was on its return to the water that it found out that it had crawled behind the pipe. And as it crawled around down there, the eggs that were dropped in that area were, in fact, collected and buried with the relocated nest. But I've talked to some experts on sea turtle nesting that indicated that if -- if the turtle had, in fact, completed its nesting successfully and the pipe hadn't been there, those eggs probably would have been dropped in the river and become snook food. So we don't feel this incident in any way caused any injury to the turtle, and we don't expect there to be any injury during the course of the project. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: As long as you're up at the podium, I had a question. One of the handouts we got today from the county staff is the interim monitoring report on South Naples -- MR. HUMISTON: That's correct. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- that was prepared by your firm. Page 55 Jui 0, J0 I MR. HUMISTON: That's right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And I just happened to be leafing through it, and there's a picture -- it's a before picture, basically -- it's page 20 of this report. Preconstruction at approximately mid to low tide, and then there's a diagram of the project -- the project goals, I guess, for the work that would be done. And in the current picture it looks like it's succeeded fabulously. Have the groins retained more sand than anticipated, or is that because the picture was taken at lower tide or what? MR. HUMISTON: I'm not sure exactly what the tide stage was there, and that certainly could affect it. But we also have monitoring data that shows that the -- the structures are performing very well. We're, in fact, very pleased with the way they are working. This is an interim monitoring report. We are in the process of preparing the one -year monitoring report. And I had, in fact, suggested to Jim Mudd at that time after the committee has an opportunity to review this report and become familiar with the project, we would be very happy to make a technical presentation to the committee. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Very good. Thank you. I will bet there's no one else from the public that needs to speak now. Is there anything else from any of the committee members? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: If not, then we're adjourned, and we'll be back together on August 2nd. MR. MUDD: And we should have name-tags, too, by that time. Okay. We've got them out for order. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Page 56 Jui 6'jjl There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 3:26 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE GARY GALLEBERG, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY BARBARA A. DONOVAN, RMR, CRR Page 57 enning August 2H e TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMM ITTEE Naples, Florida, August 2, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:30 p.m. In REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: NOT PRESENT: ALSO PRESENT: Gary Galleberg Anthony P. Pires, Jr. David Roellig John P. Strapponi Ashley D. Lupo Robert B. Stakich James L. Snediker Robert Gray William Kroeschell • e arm- Roy Anderson, Public Utilities Engineering P . es: Harry Huber, Public Utilities Engineering+ Depai�'�ialk Jon C. Staiger, Ph.D., City of Naples, Natural Ipurccs l Page 1 Item# a j Copies To: Ju 1 -27 -01 22:34A Col l iwr County Public Wks 16J1 NOTICE OF PURIJC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF RFGULAR BOARD OFN COi 1.iER f CO'.OU14TY ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMISSIONERS MEETING IL ROOM 31 THIRD FLOOR OF THE NAPLES, IIARMON TURNER BUILDING, FLORIDA 34112 ON AUGUST (12.2001 AT 1:30 T.M. ACD A 1. Roll Call 2. Additions to Agenda 3. Presentation by Humistott tic Moore Engineers • Hideaway Beach T- Groins, 3-Year Post Construction Mona tarinR Report. 4. Post -Storm Damage Assessment Report S. Project Status Report 6. Old Business Approval of Minutes for May 29, June 07 and .Tune 27, 2001 • I)iscussion regarding telecast of meeting on Channel • I)Iscussion regarding Pets on the Beach. 7, New Business • 1)iscussion regarding proposed field trips • Rcquest for Proposals a. IMP #01 -3271, Professional F.ngineerinr. Services for Coastal Zone Managemeut Projects - b. RFP 001 -3272, Production Of Beach Compatible Sand. 8. Audience Participation 9. Adjournment ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISEE THAT, IF A PL +'KSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE:. WITH Rj;SPEC:'T TO ANY MAT "1'F.R CONSIDERED A•1' THIS MFF:TING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE:, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD IMONY AND EViDENC;F U H UPON WHICH E RECORD PPEAL IS TO BE TFS THE BE BASED. P.02 16J1 August 2, 2001 August 3rd (sic), CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Welcome to the A Committee. 1 meeting of the Collier County Coastal Advisory embers are in 200 , 'm Gary Galleberg. I will note for the record that all members I rY attendance today other than Mr. Gray and M� . Mr. Anderson, would you like to begin . MR. ANDERSON: I did get a call this morning from Mr. Gray who indicated that he was out of town and won't be able to make t tin today, but he will certainly be here next time. is just a meeting enda, and t � The next item is Additions to the Ag here in case any board ht we would place lace on the standard item we thought embers -- any committee members, had any items to if here are no m at the last minute. 5 agenda or something came up additional items, we'll just continue. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG Okay. MR. ROELLIG: I have -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Vice Chairman. e FA club map. I R. ROELLIG: ' Yes. It's a -- relates to the FEM his path. M understand that the county and the city have gone down f that would They have a consultant now and so forth. I don't know i a very -- Th y be an item that this committee would be involved in. es revolve rather complexed technical issue, and -- but e something that the around coastal matters. Would this would b should we wait and see et involved in,� I m just putting this committee would want tog , what is assigned to us by the city or the county up for general consideration because what we are talking about is a significant nificant coastal aspect of that as far as storm surge an wave heights and all that sort of thing. RMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. That certainly is an item CHAI which affects -- has a multi - dimension effect, and I would under i oka ,� I would like to suggest that we take that matter ack at the next Y advisement, and we can check into it and report , Page 3 16J1 August 2, 2001 We'll talk to our attorneys and the various county kxiow at our meeting. �W . ents that are involved with that, and we'll let you kno next et a report back at the next - September next meeting. We'll g meeting -- good- MR. ROELLIG: very g if that's acceptable. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: the city building department DR. STAIGER: Mr. Cha n administration have been and the county development services working on that issue and they have hired an outside consultant And or so a o, and they have been doing a lot of and ive about a year g probably could come i g the FEMA coordinator for the city p it' going. We have been back you a briefing on just where wher e s g and forth a number of times with FEMA on these maps. And s You __ 's a lot of homework that has already been doneou all there's there n et him in -- Bob Devlin to come in and brief oblem know, we ca g significant insurance p on what it's all about because it is a with county and city residents. presentation. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think ohap his counterpart at From Mr. Devlin from the city and, p e We have spent a fair the county would be helpful. It s a big issue. addressing it on the city amount of time receiving information commission has. It's something that council -- and I know the county I hope everyone in the community is aware of, but we all need to Lion al that it's a federal program and other than legal level, understand a ' all have. direct influence on the county or the y we don It really helpful. however a presentation next month might be st a suggestion on that MR. PIRES : Mr. Chairman, if I may, just Mr. Anderson was u ossibly what item -- and I think following p p possibly the staff through thinking -- I don't intend to read his mind -- ee of their this committee can also advise the committee ht be an appropriate recommendations as to whether or not g Page 4 16J1 August 2, 2001 ate in because it may not be appropriate, or it issue for us to participate be slow down efforts. I may, actually, as supposed to assist may think that can be part of the direction to the staff. be art of the CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that received direction presentation. Both the city and county staffs have A proposal, so as Mr. from the elected officials to not accept the FE alread been done. -- Dr. Staiger said there is a lot of work that ha s Y Did you have anything else, Mr. -- MR. ROELLIG: No. Roellig MR. ANDERSON • Humiston & Moore Engineers on Item No. 3 is a presentation by Fear Post Construction the Hideaway Beach T- Groins and the Three - iston &Moore is Monitoring Report. ort. So Ken Humiston from Hum give a brief presentation on that effort as the next item here tog there? Ken, are you all set with your technology MR. HUMISTON: It will be just add this presentation that MR. ANDERSON: Okay I might basically a report that we had Ken Humiston is going to give is all the members last month, so it's submitted to you last month -- to something that has already been made available to you. But we can certainly give you a -- another cop y if Y ou need it or which just wanted to mention that. you have that MR. MUDD: Jim Mudd for the record. Sirs, do up on your monitors up there? . Ye, we do. CHAIRMAN GALLEBE RG s MR. MUDD: Okay. MR. H UMISTONen : K Humiston with Humiston & Moore Engineers. As Roy Anderson said I'm going to talk about the most n report of the T -Groin Project on Marco Island. over recent monitoring p going to o 0 That report was handed out at the last meeting. I m g g g Tha p a couple of things. Page s 16J1 August 2, 2001 The first thing . in that I would like to do is spend a couple of minutes talking about these erosion control structures that are are ca g llin the T- Groins, what their function is, and how is they of the expected to work, and then I will talk about the re monitoring. you where The exhibit up there is just a location map to show function of j is. As I said, just a couple of words about ces in the upper the project ese groins. This is a schematic drawing that illustrates like. There is th g lain view what the T groin to right -hand corner in p t is perpendicular to the shoreline coming down from an element that p the he picture. Then there is a shore parallel segment in tion the top oft p of the picture. And the lower part of this exhibit iast s bottom P view through that shore perpendicular trunk section. rank section roughly approximates a natural bench shows is that that t slope. It's done this way so that sand will be able to pass profile p across the top of it. generally have sand moving in With conventional groins you g side and cause erosion on the one direction that will pile up on on other side. The purpose of this design was to -- once the updrift side fills up with sand to allow that sand to -- cross over the low - profile st ructures so we get a more symmetrical shoreline response an established beach on both sides of it. in the upper right -hand This is essentially the same diagram lower art of it shows the shore parallel T- section. I corner, but the p is u in the middle. There is a little notch in it. The . If sa nd dust put th p to come through purpose of that is to allow wave energy ea bch fates behind this structure to the point where the dry ea a accumu that beach itself could become actually connects to the structure, sand bypassing the structur wave energy e. And the notch is to allow en. barrier to Yp ener to knock that down a little bit if that tries to happen. This is an illustration of a p permanent permanent structure, Page 6 16J1 August 2, 2001 T -groin structure. This is the shore parallel T -head. I would just like to mention there are only three of these installations that have been -- or anywhere in the world, for that matter that This built in Florida Gordon Pass ow of -- the one at Marco Island and the one by Captiva know is from a permanent installation up on just wanted to ears now. I j Island that has been there for about three these things will work use that as an example of how we anticipate because it is working very well. between this and what we have on Marco Island is The contrast b materials as a that the Marco Island project is built out of temporary requirement of the permitting agencies. It's built out of sand - filled geo textile bags. The difference is that what y ou see on your monitor is steel sheet pile with a rock apron out in front of it. The steel sheet pile is completely impermeable. So when the sand builds up behind it, eican through the structure, and at the same time the sheet ion at can t go g cut off at a very precise elevation, so it controls the keep the sand be c by waves and so forth to k p which it will be overtopped moving behind it. his is the structure on Marco Island made out oft the In contrast, t these bags are piled up, they eo textile bags. If you look at the way are filled with sand, but g illows once they are -- they are like large p they are very hard. There are gap s between them and interstitial ass through. spaces at the seams that allows sand to pass the North Captiva project. just a couple of more illustration This is wha t it looked like before the installation of the erosion- land, control structures. Very similar to what happ ened on Marco Is very rapid erosion rates. Here the erosion rates were as high as 80 feet p er year. Qn Marco Island we actually had one erosion. of monitoring where we had about 70 feet per s I mentioned, the just another shot of North Captiv. Page 7 16J1 August 2, 2001 you y conventional groin has sand building up on one side, an what typically get down-drift erosion. This is a schematic illustrating the protect on North Captiva would have looked like with ins. We op ted for the T -groin approach. conventional gro This is what it looked like during construction. Construction to at this time. You can see the sand already was almost complete ht in. This u I want to point out that no sand was brought rocesses . building p was all sand that was accumulated from the natural fter, and six This is what it looked like about three months toa , essentially months after, which is essentially what it looks like Y three years later. ' ect, as I mentioned that we are require to The Marco island p roJ Structures that came about because we are in Marco use the temporary management Plan for the Big Ma process of preparing an inlet mana been adopted by the state at the Capri Pass area. That plan had not the erosion - control project. time we wanted to move forward to move forward with the project The state agreed to allow the county with t p in nature. he sti ulation that the structures would be temporary like with the Conceptionally this is what the design was t o oAnd that is what it first three structures put in at Royal Marco read the date on it -- I From here I can' t rea looked like (indicating). see that on your monitors. think you can probably putting is what the shoreline looked like in that area prio p a -- This what you see here is actually the T- groins in (indicating ). Now, sand had been placed in this area. And you can see the ongoing away at that erosion- control project, and there eosion was eating Y e sand was not placed there re a have been various times when th easement in area. lot o g f vegetation was lost from a conservation This is what it looks like now (indicating). of Hideaway Beach we put At Sound Point on the west end been eroding very rapidly. It in two structures; that point of land has b Page 8 16J1 August 2, 2001 undermining vegetation, as it was in the other area. This is what was and g which, It looked like as of the date of that photograph (indicating), again, I can't see here. To get to the monitoring report, this is -- shows the scope of the monitoring. . We have done surveys on each one of those lines shown n this dia ram. And there are several of these that I would like to o g just show you some examples of the results of the surveys used to create a First of all, all the survey data on those lines is contour map. This is the contour map at Southpoint. I'm showing th is to you because it illustrates the very deep canal where the oreline. contour lines are close together, just 100 feet or so from the shoreline re is that we have that very deep Some of the problems down here channel there; that is why in 1991 a m ore comprehensive beach Wput a -- about 70, 000 restoration project was not done here e p yards of sand along this shoreline with the intention of monitoring it monitoring and i maintaining t with periodic renourishment because to bull wider beach would have involved filling in that channel. It would have taken a tremendous amount of sand to get a relatively narrow beach, so we are looking for another solution. placement periodically, And after maintaining that with the be t p and stabilize those we realized that a better approach would that's how we small amounts of nourishment with these structures; got to the T -groin project. If s a This is an illustration of exactly the same area (indicating). If contour of change map. In this case the green areas indicate whe as the water got deeper. Green areas are areas of erosion. The red are are where it got shallower. the contour map where If you recall the previous illustration, and yellow there that runs that deep channel was, the area of red a y n the north side of the channel is where sand had been pushed along e from the shoaled system into that channel, and the green area on t Page 9 16J1 August 2, 2001 south side is where erosion occurs. So the channel is still migrating towards Hideaway Beach, which is contributing to this erosion problem. This is the area at Royal Marco Point (indicating) A ain, we • here have the contour change map. There is more green areas indicating erosion which indicates that the stabilization of the i g structures has not been effective as it has been at Southp elns•that But I would like to point out a couple of things. On Coconut Island, which is the island right in the middle of the inlet, has been migrating to the south very signficantly over the recent and years. In fact, in 1991 when the nourishment project was done, and there was not even an erosion problem in this area. So this fairly recent erosion problem that cropped up while we were maintaining the 1991 beach restoration proj eci We replaced the three T gro ns in what was the center of the most severe erosion in this area. Since that time the erosion stress the expanded to the east. One of the discussions that we've had you p regulatory agencies is over the possibility that the erosion h that the g see to the east of the structures could be a down-drift impact, interrupting sand is moving from west to east and the structures he down-drift side. that; then it would transfer the erosion problem to ase because the To some extent that -- that probably is the are If those structures have stabilized the area right where they re. ld be structures weren't there, the sand eroded from that area ft would act that moving to the east. But this is not the classic do drithere actually you get with a traditional groin. Because, if you look, little bit of erosion on the west side of these structures as well. is a bypassing the That's an indication that sand from that area is byp structures the way the structures are allowed to byp ass. Yet the structures are holding enough material there that we of that are not significant ing t losing any more of the conservation easement. Because Page to 16J1 August 2, 2001 erosion to the east of the structures, we had recommended and are now, even as we speak, in the process of constructing a fourth T- g roin in this area to the east of the three that are there. I would also like to point out in the lower left -hand Y comer e and this you can see there is an area of accretion, which extend f the limit of this exhibit. That area is -- a significant Coconut accretion has occurred there because that is the shadow o to the east Island. So part of this problem is that sand that oward this project is accumulating in the shadow of Coconut Island and not getting to this area (indicating) where the erosion is occurring. I have several exhibits here that show the actual monitoring data profiles. This first one is on a DNR monument. As you can see the in the upper panel here (indicating), its a profile that across the island that northwest corner of Marco Island -- actually out he profile, you can is known as Sand Dollar Island. If you look at t see where Sand Dollar Island is. And you can see that there are very significant changes occurring there. The second one is a profile t hat is actually right in the T -groin le of things field and runs across that channel (indicating). A couple in that I wanted to point out here is that the area right up in the T-g ro o field in the very right -hand part of the picture has been very stable nce the T- groins were constructed. And no sand has been placed in si �' that area since the T- groins were constructed. The other thing this shows is the notch the re near the right-hand the north side of that side is that channel. you can see the changes channel. On the scale of channel in the shoal is encroached on the is erosion going on in the this drawing it is not as evident, but there migrates towards the south side of that channel as the channel shoreline causing the erosion problem. t one of these sections that I This is the -- I think this is the Page i 1 16J1 August 2, 2001 have here. I included this because it is in the area that's in the shadow of Coconut Island. You can see on the very right-hand Side of the panel on the bottom the significant accretion of sand that's occurred there. One more section that is right in the T -groin field at Royal Marco Point. What this shows -- if you look at the very right -hand side of the lower panel, the construction profile did erode back considerably. Again, this is a pretty small scale to see it, but these profiles are in the monitoring report that was passed out at the las e meeting. Once that initial readjustment occurred, that profile been very stable, even through some periods of time that we did not place any sand in that area. This is an illustration of shoreline change in the area of the T- groins at Southpoint at the west end of Hideaway Beach. What it shows over on the left -hand side is that the period of time from the 191 nourishment project until the T- groins were put in in 1996, the erosion rates were higher on those two monuments than -- on the right-hand side of this exhibit, where you can see at M -3, I think - - er again, I can't see the numbers from here -- I believe it was 2.6 feet p year. And further to the east about -- I think that's about 700 feet to the east of the other monument -- again, we had lower erosion rates. One of the things that's a little bit tricky about analyzing this monitoring data is that on a very small scale we have been putting sand in there periodically and surveying it and trying to determine what the overall affects are. So both of these periods of times shown in this exhibit had sands placed in there. In an effort to try a nd see -- to try to determine what would have occurred had that sand not been placed in there, we made some adjustments to these numbers. a Again, you can see that the -- at Monument M -3 there was significant reduction in the erosion; that's the same as it was before because no sand has been placed in that area since the T- groins were Page 12 16J1 August 2, 2001 placed. The other area further to the east, sand has been placed in there a number of times since the T- groins were put in. The erosion rate is still lower than it was prior to the T- groins, although not as significantly so. This is why we made the recommendation to construct an additional T -g roin in this area, which was just completed last week. Just one final comment. One of the things that we're hoping to accomplish with these structures is, of course, stabilizing the beach, which is habitat for nesting sea turtles, and we have coordinated with Maura Kraus on some of the sea turtle data. ongoing debate We think it's very interesting. We have had an on g w with the permitting agencies over the actual meaning of this, but if you look at this diagram, it does show that there has been an increase in the nesting density on Hideaway Beach since the T-groins put in. We do know from the physical monitoring data that the beach has been more stable since they were put in there. There could very well be a cause - and - effect relationship. elaborate on this, if I get In talking to Maura -- she's here al variation in turtle nestings for anything wrong -- but there are annual a lot of other reasons. One thing that Maura pointed out is that the lower nesting density last year for the year 2000 -- on the right -hand side of this -- may be due to the fact that Sand Dollar Island actually extended across the entrance to Big Marco Pass that obstructed would have obstructed the turtles access to this beach. s of last This year the preliminary data, I believe, there was, a week about 25 nests in the Hideaway Beach area. This is something that needs to be monitored much longer to determine if there really is a cause - and - effect relationship, but it certainly does not seem there has been any harm to the turtle nesting in this area. Page 0 16J1 August 2, 2001 And this is the final exhibit that -- I have included this in here because it does show how Sand Dollar Island is grown across the entrance to Big Marco Island Pass channel there, which is actually broken off, and that is open again this year. I will be glad to answer any questionsn CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Does one have any questions? being installed, I assume, The results from the first three T-groins °gas hoped for or anticipated; is were significantly worse than what p that right? MR. HUMISTON: We had hoped that they would be better. We did put those in with the understanding that the T g o Stabilize P in to help stabilize, but the management approach was t from the T- groins and do periodic nourishment as needed, and it has been necessary to do additional nourishmwould the differing results CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And in the be due to different erosion forces or kind of miscalculatin g beginning or -- MR. HUMISTON: We -- we believe it's largely due to the large -scale changes that have been going on in the inlet system, primary the migration of Coconut Island towards the southwest now than it because that has opened up -- Capri Pass is much wider was when the structures were originally put in. opened u to exposure to That area to the east of the structures is open hich is where some more wave energy directly out of the northwest, the tidal of the most severe wave energy comes from• on that shoreline. currents now appear to be impinging more directly � We believe that the erosion is a result of both t he increased wave that we are energy as well as tidal currents. Some of the things r that e there, we looking at right now is with the very strong tidal formations around the ends may be getting some circulation or eddy of these structures that could be part of the problem. Page 14 16J1 August 2, 2001 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: With the additional data you have and the results from the three T- groins, is it anticipated t hat this fourth groin will stabilize it or -- MR. HUMISTON: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- or is further work to be projected? That is th MR. HUMISTON: e purpose to further stabilize it. Additionally, we did complete the dredging of the entrance to Collier Bay, and all of that sand has been placed in that area where the severe erosion was. MR. SNEDIKER: Do you think another T -groin may be, in the foreseeable future, required? MR. HUMISTON: That's possible. But by the same token, these are temporary structures, and we are monitoring them for a period of time under the permit after which we will be making recommendations on what would be a more appropriate way to go. MR. SNEDIKER: How about the condition of the existing T- groins, the five that are out there now; the two and the three . There has been some rolling over the bags. Some of the bags have deteriorated. A number of the bags have broken up. Are they going to be repaired while you have got the crews out there now? MR. HUMISTON: We have no plans to repair those right now. That is another problem with these temporary structures is they are nearly as durable at the permanent ones. We have looked at -- we did some repairs last year on these structures. There are some other considerations. The wave attenuating capability of these structures is a function of both the height as well as the crest width. MR. SNEDIKER: Right. MR. HUMISTON: And when we had the bags roll off the top of it, it made them a little bit lower but a little bit wider. But at the same time we identified the loss of sand through the spaces between Page 15 16J1 August 2, 2001 the bags as part of the problem. We went in last year and put other filtering material on the back side and held that in place with a row of bags. So the structures actually now are considerably wid er than they were originally designed, and we feel the combination of the slightly lower elevation, but a wider crest width should make them as effective as the original design. variety. In some cases they are MR. SNEDIKER. But there is a va ty still the original height, but they have not -- the bags have not come off, and some are wider where the bags -- in some cases the g have just broken up and deteriorated and gone, and the sand has fell out of them. MR. HUMISTON: Yeah, that's correct. We just don't feel that it would be economically practical every time a bag is dislodged by a storm -- which is happening to us a number of times -- to go in there and mobilize the crew to remove the misplaced bags and to try and restore the structure and to try and maintain them on an annual basis at the same configuration as they were originally designed, because we don't believe functionally there is a large difference between the way they are now and the way the original design plan showed them. MR. SNEDIKER: I guess I would have thought when the crews were out there now, that might be a time to redo that -- to do the repair work. MR. HUMISTON: Well, it certainly would be, but, you know, we were focusing primarily on the additional structures to try and address the severe erosion in the areas where it was the most important. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Anything} else? Thank you, Mr. Humiston. you can MR. HUBER: If just -- if you don't mind, stay there. if you could go through those slides And getting into this next item, that you have. Page 16 16J1 August 2, 2001 MR. ANDERSON: I just wanted to interject something. Mr. Chairman, I just wanted to -- the next item on the agenda is a post- storm damage assessment, and what -- what we wanted to basically describe to you was the damage -- give you an update of the damage that had occurred due to the storms -- the storm of last week. And what we've got here is a -- kind of a three -part presentation. that The first is a -- first of all, we passed out some photographs we've taken that illustrates some of the storm damage. And we've also got Ken Humiston has loaded some photographs that he took, f which are very similar to what we handed out, and we've asked him i he could walk through the series of photos he's done, which are set p the same way as your handout. We started in the northern part up in Vanderbilt area and then were working south. in to give you an Then we also have Maura Kraus, who is Ha Willy et into a update about the turtle nesting damage, and estimates. report on the magnitude of the damage and som e And so with your indulgence we'll begin that presentation. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Very good. u I want MR. ANDERSON: Maybe while they are getting eat up to make a couple of notations, if I could. As you notic Harry Huber is back with us. He's back working with us on a full -time basis, and we are glad to have him back. So he ' s -- hell be at the n ext few meetings. And we were also pleased to announce that Ron Hovell, our new project manager for the beach program, is with us of Jul and he's helping out already. He started on the 31 st CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Welcome back, a nd welcome starting. MR. ANDERSON: And the last item that I wanted to mention is that we have made up the nameplates. We have them here. However, we have got some additional logistical problems. There to have are only five holders, so I think what we are probably going Page 17 16J1 August 2, 2001 to do is get nine freestanding holders to put up top. And we'll have those set for next month. MR. SNEDIKER: Here is a whole bunch of them right now. MR. ANDERSON: Oh, there are. Okay. Okay. Maybe we can -- if we -- set those up during the meeting and try not to be too disruptive. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, maybe we'll take a short break after this. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. That's fine. Ken, would you like to proceed with the photos? MR. HUMISTON: Yes, I think I'm ready now. Here are some pictures that were taken last week of the effects of the storm that we experienced. I believe it was the 21 st and 22nd of July. Starting at the north end of the county, this is Vander bilt Beach (indicating). In the upper right -hand side of this, you can see there is an erosion escarpment there. It's not very pronounced here. It's probably in the order of a foot to a foot - and -a -half high. there is a This is in front of the Ritz- Carlton (indicating). Again, fairly mild erosion scarp. Both of these photographs are in the area that was nourished with the beach - restoration project. this is in A little farther to the south in the Pelican Bay Strand, front of one of the condominiums there (indicating). You an s e there is very pronounced erosion scarp. The erosion has occurred s of underneath this walkover. If you look closely at the bottom p that walkover, it's a pretty large step down to the beach. all the Farther to the south there is a continuous erosion scarp way down to Clam Pass and on down into Naples. I included this one (indicating) because it shows some of the old relic stumps that were in this area is an indication the storm uncovered some things that had not been uncovered before. One of the other problems is that the erosion ate into the dune. Page is 16J1 August 2, 2001 As Maura can attest, there's a number of the -- large number of the nests in Collier County were washed out by this storm. The ones that survived in areas like this was where the turtle managed to get up into the vegetative part of the dune beyond where the erosion scarp progressed to. This is the north beach facility at Pelican Bay. This picture was taken on a very low tide. Somewhere around the middle of the n picture, you can see the high tide line by a little bit of the debris on the beach, which you can imagine the water up there it doesn't leave very wide beach. I also want to add the storm is taking all of that material away from the dune in creating that erosion scarp, a lot of that materia l is still in the near shore area as an offshore bar. At a high tide, o would be would have a trough between the bar and the beach, but t ex ect very shallow on that offshore bar. And we would normt that under general wave -- gentle wave climate, a lot of that sand would move back to the beach. We expect the beach to recover somewhat in the near future. This is just south of Clam Pass and the county park (indicating). This area has the highest erosion scarp as anywhere in the county. Here, again, you can see the erosion went past one of the boardwalks coming from the beach facility out there, and the that board walk is closed. And here's a picture with a live human being in it to illustrate the scale of that scarp; that's on the order of about five feet high. This is in the Park Shore area, which was recently nourished with the material hauled in by a truck. There is no erosion scarp here. There may be a couple of reasons for that. One is that material that was hauled in was fairly coarse good beach material that you would expect to hold up better. The other is there is really no dune here on this beach. It just Page 19 16J1 August 2, 2001 goes up to the seawall. The beach berm was an elevation of about plus 5. It may very well have been overtopped by a lot of the storm action. The places in the county where we see the erosion scarp is where that was a dune that went to a higher elevation of 6 or 7 maybe S feet. The storm waves ate into that higher elevation creating a scarp. This is in front of the Beach Club (indicating). There is an erosion scarp there, not as high as farther north. And then that is farther south along Naples Beach. I'm not sure exactly which street this is at (indicating). This is just north of Gordon Pass. This is a panorama view showing the T- groins at Gordon Pass. And on the very left -hand side of that picture there is a turtle nest, which you can see more clearly here. This is -- this is an area where there was no beach prior to this erosion control project, so there was no possibility of nesting in that area. I think it's significant for two reasons; one, now there is a beach there. Not only that, this nest did survive that storm provided that it wasn't overtopped to the extent that it would have been adversely affected by that. On Marco Island in the area of the T- groins projects that area held up very well. It may not have been exposed to as direct wave action as the open coast where we saw the escarpment formation, but it did hold up very well, both at -- Royal Marco Point was the previous one (indicating), and this is at Southpoint. Farther south of Marco Island this is very close t o the south end of the island looking north. This is in the area of the beach restoration project in 1991. There is a small erosion scarp there. This is not really a problem. There is a very wide beach in that area. That scarp will probably be knocked down by weathering. There is still a very wide beach in that area. Page 20 16J1 August 2, 2001 This is just the final photograph (indicating) looking south toward the segment of breakwater at Caxambas Pass. MR. ANDERSON: Thank you. Thank you very much, Ken. Next we would like to ask Maura Krause if she would come up and give us an overview of the sea turtle nest damage and what -- how the prognosis looks at this point. MS. KRAUS: Hi, I'm Maura Kraus, Collier County Natural Resource Department. Before the storm we had 945 sea turtle nests. After the storm we have 414 left. We lost 56 percent. And the sea turtle hatching has been real slow because the month of May was very cool, and the turtles started nesting a little bit later. So when the storm hit we had most of the nests on the beach. We lost a total of 56 percent, which was a lot. We did lose a lot of markers but possibly not all the nests. We mark them with wooden stakes. It's a really hard job to try — to refind a lost nest. We're trying to locate two of them right now so that the area can be opened to beach cleaning. We're having a little bit of difficulty with that, but hopefully by the end of the week we will find these two areas so we can mark them off. We did have 35 nests on the new beach -- on the new beach sand at Park Shore and also in Hideaway Beach. We have 18 left. So we still have a good number that we can get a good idea with the new sand -- how those sea turtles are acting with the new sand. We have success of -- three of the nests on the new sand was over 90 percent; so it looks pretty good. We are real happy with the new sand. Does anyone have any questions? MR. PIKES: Maura, just a quick question. You mentioned about the staking or identify stakes are missing from a lot of the nests are wooden stakes. Is there thought to, perhaps, having one more permanent -- sort of like a steel rod placed where you stake it out for Page 21 16J1 August 2, 2001 identification later on? MS. KRAUS: That could be a possibility. Right now we have them GPSed, and we've never had to locate a nest that has been lost before, so we're just in a learning process now. We are trying to navigate back to the areas. We have a pretty good GPS, so we should be able to get within, you know, 5 or 10 feet of the nest. MR. ANDERSON: One of the impacts of -- of the storm is that because of the problem with the turtle nests we are precluded from going back and doing any restoration of any kind for the beach areas, so we -- we can't do anything with any mechanical equipment. We did have manual work. We arranged for some prisoners to work there this past Saturday to go along and pick up some of the rocks. But we can't do anything with any mechanical means, and we can't do any reshaping until the -- actually, until -- we got a letter from our Community Development Services indicating that the state is saying that we can't do anything until -- until November 1 st. And I understand we're supposed to be getting a formal notification from the DEP to that effect in the very near future; is that correct, Maura? Did I state that all correctly? MR. KRAUS: Yes. MR. PIRES: Maura, does that also affect any vehicle- on -the- beach permits for any other entities such as the hotels and things like that? MR. ANDERSON: I can't answer that. Do you have any clarification on that one, Maura? MS. KRAUS: Yeah. It depended on where the nests were. Like the Ritz - Carlton, for instance, they had four nests on their property at the time the storm hit, and they are all still there. So, you know, certain areas are allowed to do the beach cleaning and raking. The Ritz- Carlton is one of them. Clam Pass Beach is not. MR. PIRES: Thanks, Maura. Page 22 16J1 August 2, 2001 MS. KRAUS: Thank you. MR. STRAPPONI: When we first identified the nests, I imagine that's a visual identification probably from the disruption from the sand when the nests first goes in? MS. KRAUS: Yes. We see the tracks. Then we see the — the nests. MR. STRAPPONI: Bear with me. MS. KRAUS: Sure. MR. STRAPPONI: You will have to walk me through this. At that point in time, we go ahead and we stake the nests, and we put some markers on it. And then imagine with the normal wind and rain that's probably not visually recognized because it levels out with the rest of the sand and the tracks are gone. MS. KRAUS: Yes. MR. STRAPPONI: So the only identification from that point on would be the stakes and the ribbon? MR. KRAUS: Yes -- yes, sir. MR. STRAPPONI: And if we lose that, we have marked these apparently using GPS numbers. The GPS is how accurate? MR. KRAUS: Supposed to be within a meter. MR. STRAPPONI: Within a meter. MS. KRAUS: Yeah. MR. STRAPPONI: Three feet, approximately. Then why would we be having difficulty relocating these nests after the markers have been washed away by the storm? MS. KRAUS: Because it's a learning process for us too. We haven't had to locate a nest before, and there's -- you have to take certain weigh points and -- it's kind of a complicated thing. So we are just trying to figure it out right now. MR. STRAPPONI: I'm not -- MS. KRAUS: So there's also -- we lost 531 nests. It didn't -- Page 23 August 2, 2001 MR. STRAPPONI: How many people do we have to find them? MS. KRAUS: How many people? We have one person that is responsible for each beach. MR. STRAPPONI: Okay. Four people. I'm surprised to learn the GPS has a one -meter accuracy because as a — MS. KRAUS: That's after it's corrected. So we have to do some corrections. MR. STRAPPONI: Okay. So you have to do the correction. MS. KRAUS: Yes. MR. STRAPPONI: Is there any way to -- obviously you can't use a metal detector. But do we have any kind of electronic means of possibly from noise to identify the nest? MS. KRAUS: No. MR. STRAPPONI: Strictly GPS? MS. KRAUS: Strictly GPS. You know, when we GPS we don't always know exactly where the eggs are. So we hold the GPS over the nest site. So, you know, it's hard to find the eggs. It's hard to find the eggs when you see the turtle nesting and she leaves. It's like finding a needle in a haystack. The area that opens up into the cavity of the nest is only about that big (indicating). MR. STRAPPONI: Thank you. MS. KRAUS: Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. ANDERSON: Now, we are putting Harry to work right away. So, Harry, would you like to give us your report? MR. HUBER: Okay. As Maura had mentioned and Roy had mentioned before, this situation with the sea turtle nests is significantly affecting our beach - cleaning operation. And they say we are trying to open up as many areas as we can by -- through the process of trying to relocate the lost nests and remark them because, you know, if the nests were marked and we can theoretically continue Page 24 16J1 August 2, 2001 our beach - cleaning operation in that area, since we know where the nests are and we can avoid them. But right now we have -- the most -- I guess the most serious situation is down on Marco where we have all the seaweed So accumulated down there which is getting pretty rank at this point. we do have an area down there between Residents Beach and South Seas Condo, which is an area of maybe 4, 000 feet where we have been given permission to go in there and resume our beach cleaning because all the nests are still marked in that area. There was none lost. So -- but there is also some -- an area of about 3, 000 feet up in Vanderbilt, which there is -- only one nest was lost in that area. We are going to try and relocate that, so it will be, you know, a continuing, evolving process where we try to resume the beach cleaning in as many areas as possible. But my understanding that -- the stipulation that came down, you know, not only from our Community Development, but I think that came from direction from DEP, was that all beach - cleaning operations would be suspended until September 30th, you know, unless you had a specific authorizations, just like I was just referring to in certain areas where the nests have been relocated. Then I also went through to try to quantify the damage that was done as far as beach fill goes, you know, the sand that was lost because of the erosion. And here again, these are real rough figures. Here's the procedure that I used to make the determination. I took Vanderbilt Beach, and I just took the whole length of the beach that was restored back in '96. It was about 7,300 feet, and I took a beach width of 70 feet and average erosion of 2 feet in depth, which equates to about 38, 000 cubic yards. I went down to Clam Pass, and I took an area of about 3, 000 foot length of beach -- here again, 70 foot wide. Here I took a depth of 4 foot average, which equates to Page 25 16J1 August 2, 2001 31, 000 cubic yards. Then for Naples I took the entire length of the restored beach, which is about 15,600 feet. Here, I just took an average width of about 50 feet and 2 foot deep, and it comes to 58, 000 yards. And taking all of those and adding them up, it comes 127, 000 cubic yards. So immediately -- theoretically, immediately after the storm if we were going to consider going in there and restoring the beach to where it was right before the storm, theoretically that's what the volume of beach fill that we would have to put back in there. As Ken Humiston mentioned before, there is a certain amount of recovery that happens, maybe within the next couple of weeks or month, and so that figure could be considerably reduced. But I thin k if we were to recommend some kind of action in this regard, first of all, we want to monitor the recovery, and then we need to -- based on that monitoring, we need to identify areas where we feel we are going to recommend we need to place some fill after November 1 st after the sea turtle season is over and during the next off sea turtle season. And that in conjunction with our incremental beach maintenance program where we have planned on an annual basis to place 50, 00 cubic yards on the beach. Not only for this purpose but also for that purpose, we need within the next month or so, identify those areas where we want to put that 50, 000 cubic yards next year or more if being necessary. So we are going to be looking at next month's meeting to try and make those determinations, because we need to get started to prepare the plans and get those submitted to DEP so they can give us the authorization by November as to where we will be placing those materials. MR. PIKES: Harry, I guess one thought on -- maybe sort of follow -up on Maura was mentioning part of this -- for next year recognizing that we are in a learning curve -- the staff is learning on the nesting -- the nest marking and relocating and finding, it seems to Page 26 16J1 August 2, 2001 be a critical component of the ability to do -- engage in quite a few activities between May and November including construction activities, I guess, like, sea control line, beach raking; is there an opportunity as far as this assessment while you are doing the measurement of the damage to the beaches as far as sand loss to also look at boosting the staffing for the nesting aspect to locate the nesting to be able to engage maybe in more activities between now and November? Is that possible? Just a thought. MS. LUPO: Going back to, I guess, the beginning of your speech, you stated there is a moratorium absent special authorization until September 30th for beach cleanup because of the turtle nests? MR. HUBER: Yes, ma'am. MS. LUPO: Does that coordinate with the end of hatching season, or is that just an arbitrary date they placed on it? MR. HUBER: I think the basis of that -- and Maura can confirm -- the basis, I think -- that's the anticipated time when all the nests would probably be hatched. MS. LUPO: So if we haven't found them by September 30th, then they are deemed destroyed and you can go ahead with your beach cleanup? MR. HUBER: Well, I -- we would probably -- that would be subject to -- at least in my mind, I would want to have confirmation from DEP that that would be the situation at that point in time. MS. KRAUS: The September 30th date came from 70 days after the storm. An average nest hatches between 65 and 70 days; that's where that September 30th came from. What we could do is we could look at the--nests by DNR monument and as that 70 or 80 days after that nest should have hatched, we can mark it off and keep opening up areas; so that's the only other thing we can do. The state is worried that we have nests out there that, you know, we might damage. And -- for instance, we Page 27 16J1 August 2, 2001 have one nest in Pelican Bay that lost most of the sand off of the top. The eggs were exposed, and a raccoon got it two days later, so we found that nest. So -- and there are areas where the nests are totally lost. MS. LUPO: Do you have to -- I'm sorry. Do you have to locate the physical nests, or do you just have to mark it off? So if you know the GPS is accurate within a yard, can you mark off a 2 by 2, or do you actually have to find the eggs? MS. KRAUS: No. I think we would probably mark off about a 15 -foot area. MS. LUPO: Okay. Once you marked off the 15 -foot area, within that stretch of beach, then you can bring the cleanup crew in at that point? MS. KRAUS: We are hoping so. MR. STRAPPONI: I would just like a clarification. When we talked about the 56 percent lost, are we talking about the nests were lost to the storm, destroyed, or we just lost the locations? MS. KRAUS: Both. MR. STRAPPONI: Both? MS. KRAUS: Yes, we have no idea. MR. STRAPPONI: So that 56 percent, a good portion of those could still be active nests? MS. KRAUS: Yes. MR. STRAPPONI: We don't know where they are? MS. KRAUS: Yes. MR. STRAPPONI: Okay. Thank you. MS. KRAUS: I do have a copy of this. M MR. PIKES: Thank you, Maura. MS. LUPO: Well, this happens -- pretty much every summer when we have this rainy season. What is the average casualty? Is 56 percent normal for this time of year for a storm, or is this unusual? Page 28 August 2, 2001 MS. KRAUS: This is definitely very unusual. Usually the storms are later in the season, and the turtles have started nesting very late this year because of the water temperature. It was didn't hit until, like, the third week, I believe, of May, and also the whole month of May was very cool. They usually hatch, you know, anywhere between 55 and 65 days. Well, we are not seeing hatching now for 70 days. So we had an incredible amount of nests that should have already been gone had we had a normal season before the storm hit. MS. LUPO: Thank you. MR. SNEDIKER: Harry, last winter we had a major problem in locating sand. As we -- those of us who were involved know about it -- and then we got into the trucking and then we got into the bonding of the truck drivers -- the trucking companies, et cetera, et cetera. Just so we can alleviate that problem, it looks like we wil l needing 100, 000 yards maybe -- somewhere in that nature of sand - shou ld we be taking steps now to find sand sources and meeting the specifications that we want; the S curve and all we went through before, plus, obviously, the state DEP approval for that sand. MR. HUBER: Well, as a matter of fact, if you go down on the agenda, down there under "New Business, Request For Proposals, one of those requests for proposals is for production of beach sand. And so we've already started the process to do that. MR. SNEDIKER: Very good. I will wait. I just got the agenda. I did not see that far. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions or comments? Thank you. Why don't we take a short break? Not more than 5 minutes and get the name plates up, and we will get back to business. (A short break was held.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Anderson, why don't we -- Page 29 16J1 August 2, 2001 MR. ANDERSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We can resume. And the -- committee members, why don't we get started again. During the break a member of the public came to me -- and before we move on to the next item, they would like to make a comment regarding the storm damage and turtle nesting. MR. RATH: Good afternoon. My name is Carson Rath. I'm the manager of the Ritz - Carlton of Naples. The reason that I asked to share with you the storm at the Ritz - Carlton, share also the impact the storm had on the entire county, we at the Ritz - Carlton currently are in a situation like we haven't been for many years. The storm -- MR. ANDERSON: I'm having trouble hearing. MR. RATH: I'm sorry. The storm impacted us so badly that our -- our guests are actually literally checking out. From a career standpoint of view, we have lost 31 percent of our business since the storm in comparison to the last three years. So that, of course, doesn't only affect us immediately, but it also affects the county in a sense, that we use their tax. We are very concerned that there was a date out there that this -- that the beach would not be able to be cleaned up and be restored before November 1. Of, course, off season as you would appreciate, is already a very difficult time for us because, obviously, we don't have the same amount of guests coming to town as we did in season, l but the ones we have, we would like to spoil at the beach. We would like them to have the access to the beach and use the beauty of the Gulf. Now, 31 percent lost in business, which we can, you know, track back to not having beach access or at least very limited beach access for our guests is deteriorating. Moreover, we are also concerned about the reputation of the Ritz - Carlton of Naples and the entire county. We have guests complaining. In fact, this morning I got a letter from a guest and Page 30 16J1 August 2, 2001 telephone calls to our corporate office -- that the guests have checked out are taking it further and saying "You didn't tell us about the storm. You didn't tell us about what the beach looked like, and we came down to Naples to enjoy ourselves." support and to ask The reason I got up here is to ask for y our pp you to put yourselves in our shoes, be concerned that November I is, indeed, the date that we lose business. We lose bed tax. If, indeed, the date is September 30th, which was mentioned early on, we would be, of course, very eager to ask you to help us to start right on that date with cleaning the beach where the Ritz - Carlton is located. I know my colleague has some other questions, if that wou ld be okay too. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Sure. To what degree do we does the county have authority on dates? Isn't that mandated mostly from the state? MR. ANDERSON: Yes, it is, along the parameters of what Maura had indicated, the -- so we are really -- until September 30th we really can't move, with -- with the exception of there are some nests that are confirmed to either be hatched or -- you know, we get the all clear for certain specific areas. That -- with that exception. But other than that, no, we don't have any flexibility. rake their MS. KRAUS: The Ritz - Carlton will be allowed to beach, you know, after we do the morning monitoring because no nests in the Ritz - Carlton were lost or unmarked. MR. RATH: Well, first of all, we are, of course, Maura, are happy to learn that the three nests didn't get -- have any damage. Raking is very good and is important. But restoring, bringing the sand back, is what we are looking for. MS. KRAUS: The state won't let us do that, not until after sea turtle nesting season. They don't allow beach renourishment during turtle season. Page 31 16J1 August 2, 2001 MR. RATH: You are saying November 1 is the date that you are referring to? Maybe I misunderstood early on. I understood you to say that September 30th would be 70 days and, therefore, the September 30th would be the date that we could start restoring beach. MR. SNEDIKER: That's after beach renourishment. That was beach cleaning, I think she was referring to. Beach renourishment is a different subject entirely, that I'm sure you know. MR. RATH: So you are saying it's a DEP issue. Is that what you are saying? MR. SNEDIKER: DEP. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: DEP at the state level. MR. RATH: Yeah. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Environmental agency but at the state level. MR. RATH: Right. MR. ANDERSON: As we indicated we expect a letter -- a letter from the DEP in the next week -- week or so. We'll have the citations and the legal authority and all of that, so we would b e happy to share that with you, if you give us a call. MR. RATH: That would be wonderful. Thank you very much. Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Okay. That will then conclude Item 4. Next on our agenda is Item 5, Project Status Report. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. Thank you. Harry -- I have asked Harry to put together a brief status report on our present projects in this FY '01, which is going to be coming to a close on October I s and then to give a brief look ahead in terms of our projects for the next year of FY '02. Harry. MR. HUBER: Okay. What was intended here was just to bring Page 32 16J1 August 2, 2001 you up to date on projects that we have ongoing right now, actually under construction or we are doing some studies on. Collier Bay Entrance Dredging, that -- that has been completed. It was completed earlier this month. And probably just like we gave to you also on the beach fill for Park Shore and Hideaway Beach, we'll be preparing a post - construction report and get it to you as soon as that is finished. And the project that was sort of related to that, Collier Bay Entrance Dredging, the additional T- groins that Mr. Humiston referred to down at Hideaway Beach, the additional one down at Southpoint has been completed, and the one at Lower Marco Point is about 80 percent completed. We are anticipating that -- hopefully that -- that one will also be completed by probably the end of next week. There again, we will be preparing the post - construction report on that. Also Humiston & Moore is working on a feasibility report for using the offshore shoals for a source of sand for renourishing -- major renourishment of Hideaway Beach, which is the design for that is included in next year's budget. But he's currently doing the feasibility report on that; that could be completed here within a week or so. And we will be distributing that report for you for discussion at next month's meeting. And also we're sort of gearing up and preparing the design and bid documents for implementing the majority of the projects that are . budgeted for next year. And we're also conducting at this point in time a joint county -wide monitoring of the beaches in the offshore area with DEP. DEP is doing all the offshore monitoring, and we are doing the -- surveying the upland profile of the beaches, and that should be completed probably by the end of this month. And so -- we -- normally we used to -- we had an annual concert -- we would do the annual monitoring of all the beach - restoration areas, but this particular program here where DEP is cost sharing with us to perform Page 33 16J1 August 2, 2001 this monitoring this year -- that's how we are accomplishing that this year. Now, also Clam Pass dredging is -- my understanding Pelican Bay Services Division administers that project. I think they are in the process of trying to start the design and get the plans and bid documents ready for dredging as soon as possible after the sea turtle season is over. So -- I think that material dredged out at Clam Pass will then be placed on the area of Clam Pass park where we had the significant erosion here. Now, I will defer to Dr. Staiger for those projects that are currently going on in the City of Naples. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Before we go to Dr. Staiger, I have one question. Did you say, Mr. Huber, that next month we will be receiving a report from Humiston & Moore, a presentation, regarding the use of offshore sand for Hideaway Beach? MR. HUBER: Yes. We currently have a project where he's performing that feasibility study and that will be completed within about a week, and we will distribute that report and their recommendations to you for discussion at next month's meeting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That would include, perhaps, steps that are being taken or safeguards that are being put in place to avoid the problems that Naples experienced in the last few years with rocks on the beach? MR. HUBER: Yeah. Well, actually, this is just determining whether it's feasible to use those particular areas for a sand source. They have already -- they have met with DEP .in Tallahassee, and we have met with Rookery Bay, so after they complete this feasibility study, then there'll be a number of other steps to go out there and actually make further tests to determine whether it is, in fact, beach - compatible material. So it's a long ways to go before we would actually -- and then we would ultimately have to get a permit to use Page 34 August 2, 2001 that particular sand, so this is just the first step in a long process. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Well, we appreciate that. Then given the experience that the city and county has had in the last few years, I'm sure everybody will be interested in knowing what additional safeguards are in place this time around. MR. PIKES: Mr. Chairman, if I may, just one question to Harry, if possible? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Sure. MR. PIRES: I think in the packet that I received was the Hideaway Beach Marco Island April 2001 incremental maintenance post - construction report. Is that a proper discussion for today under this presentation for Harry, I guess? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Sure. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. MR. PIKES: I guess just a question. I note in the back -- I'm not a technical guy -- I have Humiston and you -guys -- but it has examples of beach profile of the design versus the place. And I guess from the standpoint of the agencies do these reports go to the agencies and then they analyze it to ensure that the permit conditions are being complied with? And I guess the question is, it seems like the sloping is substantially different as far as the fill being placed as opposed to the design fill. And I don't know if that would have an effect on the agencies' review of future permit applications. MR. SNEDIKER: Harry, do we have an extra copy of that -- another copy? MR. HUBER: I can get you one. MR. SNEDIKER: I guess we need a few, yeah. MR. HUBER: Okay. We'll get that. MR. HUMISTON: Ken Humiston of Humiston & Moore. We do send that information to the agencies, and the profiles that are sent up there for the permit approval are to estimate the quantity. The Page 35 16J1 August 2, 2001 technical staff up there recognize that when you're placing material on kind of a slow process by bringing it in by trucks that the profile may not look exactly like the lines and grades of the design. We are really more interested in the quantity of the material. The permit always specifies that it's approximate anyway. So there will not be -- I don't anticipate there's going to be any regulatory problems with that. MR. PIRES: Okay. So the sloping appears to be within parameters of the agency review and the permit criteria; right? MR. HUMISTON: Right. MR. ROELLIG: I can't remember -- excuse me -- when were the surveys done for the -- there were four surveys? MR. HUMISTON: I don't remember the exact dates. I believe the surveys before were done within a week or two of when the sand was placed there. MR. ROELLIG: So those were actually design surveys -- the side profiles were the actuals of when the project started? MR. HUMISTON: Right. MR. PIRES: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions or comments? Dr. Staiger. DR. STAIGER: Okay. We have a number of things underway in the City of Naples. We do have progress on some things, which is kind of pleasant. The Doctor's Pass dredging project is a tad troublesome. The contractor had engaged a local marine contractor to do the rock - removal portion of it that they had not been able to do themselves, and the -- they then ordered that local contractor to stop working. And we are going to be taking a resolution to city council. For the next meeting, which is August 15th, to declare the contractor in default. And we have already notified the performance bond company that they are probably going to have to take the Page 36 16J1 August 2, 2001 project over to get it finished. The contractor has -- the contractor that's doing the project, United Contractors and Engineers, from the Fort Lauderdale area, they are hard to get a hold of and kind of hiding out in the Bahamas. And so we don't know for sure what, if any, reconciliation there's going to be on this thing at this point. They may come back with some kind of a -- of an idea as to how to do it without losing their bond, but they may or may not. At any rate, we need to get the roc k removed from the -- from the inlet, and we are going to be pressuring the bonding company to get somebody to do that. There really isn't enough money left in the project right now to -- to pay for that; that's one of the problems. They -- they racked up some rather substantial bills with local businesses that the city has been paying the bills for them rather than paying the contractor himself. So we'll see what happens with that one. MR. SNEDIKER: Jon, is this the same firm that we had problems with last winter with not showing up and the barge getting over here -- DR. STAIGER: Yes. Yes. Yes. MR. SNEDIKER: -- and the barge grounding out? It had to be repaired? DR. STAIGER: Yeah. They had 120 days to finish the project, and they started at about Day 90. So it's -- they were supposed to be done on the 8th of December of the year 2000. And so there's a rather significant amount of liquidated damages going on in there too. But, you know, we will just have to play it by ear. We paid them for the dredging they did, and they did dredge the sand out of the inlet. It's basically the rock that remains that we need to get taken out of there. We have obtained all of the necessary permits from the state and the Army Corp of Engineers to do this Parker Sandweb experiment Page 37 16J1 August 2, 2001 on the beach in Olde Naples starting in November, so we will see that get cranked up and see how that thing works. For those of you who don't know, it's essentially a field of groins made out of webbing -like fishnetting, but it's not fishnet; it's much more substantial. But a series of these things on about -- I think 100 - foot centers for about 1,200 linear feet of beach south of the Naples Pier, and the installation will go in from the upper beach out into mean low water or lower low water in that area. So these things will be three or four hundred feet in length, and they function like a groin. They interrupt the movement of sand down the beach. And we did an experiment using that method back in the late 1980s, and it was a relatively short duration and only a500 -foot stretch of beach so that it was not a particularly conclusive experiment. So we are looking at a half a mile -- or excuse me, a quarter of a mile of beach, as long as -- many months as we can. It could go in for the entire length of the nonturtle nesting season, November through April. It could -- could last that long. At any rate, we have got all the permits for that, which was quite an accomplishment. We also have the permit in hand now for sand tightening the jetty at Gordon Pass, which is a permit Humiston & Moore has obtained. And that project involves the outer length of the Gordon Pass jetty reinforcing additional rock and sheet pile and filter- fabric type of material to prevent the sand that moves north on the north end of Key Island from going through the jetty into the inlet. There's a sand transport reversal on Key Island from -- from a seven or eight hundred or a thousand feet south of the inlet down to the south, the sand moves down towards Big Marco /Capri Pass. But in the -- the quarter mile or so area that is just immediately south of the inlet there is a reversal, and the sand is pushed north, and it tends to go right through the jetty into the inlet. And the inner third or so of that jetty or maybe half of it was sand tightened some years back, Page 38 16J1 August 2, 2001 but the sand continues to go around so the jetty has a big curve in it that tends to keep the sand in that area if -- if it's not permeable. So that is a project that will be undertaken pretty soon. I think the next step is the design of the actual -- I mean, the repair has been designed, but the actual contracting I haven't talked to Ken about it. We do have the permit for that. The other two projects underway that involve tourist tax dollars are the restoration of the pavilion at Lowdermilk Park and also the repair of some City of Naples beach access ends, and the beach access -- the street -end repairs have been accomplished. The Lowdermilk Park progress has been designed. I'm in the process of filling out the permit application, but we have decided we don't want to do that project because it involves either demolishing or almost demolishing the entire pavilion at Lowdermilk; that we will probably hold off on that until next summer. We don't want to end up with the -- with the concession stand and all of that stuff out of commission the end ---the end of the season this winter, so we will probably hold off on that until the Summer of 2000 -- or 2002. But that -- that project is underway, and I believe'the previous beach committee was familiar with it. But what we are trying to do essentially there is -- is bring that thing into compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. The present structure, the bathrooms are noncompliant. The kitchen for the concessionaire is too small, and kitchen storage in some places is accessed through the bathroom. So there is a lot of problems with just code conformity and ADA compliance. And there should be a lot of termites; I mean, that's the impression that we have is the termites are kind of holding it together. So we need -- we need to get that whole thing rebuilt. It will be built in it footprint. We are not -- we are making it a little bigger to the north, but otherwise it's going to be a comparable structure. I can't think of anything else Page 3s 16J1 August 2, 2001 that we are doing in the city, unless Harry can. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any questions or comments? I have just one question. As of a few months ago, a similar project to the Parker Web system had been approved by the state, I think, to run the test in the Panhandle. DR. STAIGER: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Is that -- that was ahead of our project at the permitting stage. But is that going to commence on the ground -- on the shore in November, or is that up and running already? DR. STAIGER: No. It's up and running. And it has been up and running since last winter or earlier this -- it has been running for a good bit of this year, and it's still in place. The -- there are no turtle nesting concerns in that -- in that area because it's north of the range; so that it's been there. And apparently it's working. It's a different energy -- wave energy climate up there, so we -- have -- we haven't -- I haven't been keeping track of it, but the Parker people have been watching it rather closely and apparently succeeding. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Are the conditions in the system itself similar enough that we will be able to perhaps glean some knowledge from that test? DR. STAIGER: They have, I think, utilized some -- you know, they have done some learning from that one just on what -- what they need to do to make sure the thing doesn't fall apart in a storm. They had some fairly significant damage to that installation. It's -- it's on the beach in front of Eglin Air Force Base. I think it's in Destin is where that project is underway. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Any other questions or comments. Okay. Now, we move to old business. We have three Items 6, Page 40 16J1 August 2, 2001 old business. The first is an action item. Approval of the minutes from May 29, June 7th, and June 27, 2001. And if there are any corrections, bring them up now; otherwise, we can entertain a motion -- MR. STAKICH: I make a motion they be approved. MR. STRAPPONI: I second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All in favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes unanimously. Next, my understanding is that we are being televised as we speak. The next item on our agenda is discussion regarding the telecast of our meetings on Channel 54. MR. ANDERSON: Right. Yes. This was brought up,at the last meeting. It would -- we discussed discussing it at the next meeting, but I guess it's -- they are here tonight -- this afternoon, so the -- it's whatever your pleasure is. If you want to have a discussion, or we want to just -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We will take comments. I don't see much need for a discussion. It's the county's practice to televise public meetings -- MR. ANDERSON: Sure. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- and we have information, I'm sure, the public is interested in. MR. PIKES: That was going to be my only comment I found them, just living in the county, very informative all the various boards that are being televised. And my attitude and approach, I think, and the committee as a whole and the staff is, the more the public is advised and informed of various issues in the community, the better off the community as a whole is. They are in the Page 41 16J1 August 2, 2001 community. So I applaud the fact that it's being televised. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'm sure we all agree. Okay. Pets on the beach. MR. ANDERSON: At the last meeting, Mr. Chairman, there was a question raised as to allowing pets to go on the beach, as was indicated is being done in Lee County. There is a newspaper article presented by Jack Strapponi, committee member, to that effect, so it was agreed that we would look into the history of this and give you a report back. And this memo is -- is to that end. Basically just to paraphrase it, we looked into the issue of allowing the pets on the beaches. I communicated with Marla Ramsey, who is the Director of Parks and Recreation for the county, and she indicated that no pets have been allowed on Collier County beaches historically, although there was a dog park approved for Veterans Park. I think it was about a year -- a year or so ago. In 1997, January, there was an action on the Board of County Commissioners to turn down an ordinance to allow the dogs on beaches. So there seems to be a, you know -- historically there seems to have been kind of a -- a negative attitude towards allowing the dogs on the beach, so -- but if anyone is interested in following this up further, the contact could be directed to Ms. Ramsey at -- and I have her telephone number, 353 -0404; that really is primarily a recreation -type issue, as opposed to, you know, a -- as to -- opposed to an action before the subject of -- you know, that would be taken up as a subject matter of this committee, I would suggest. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. There has been substantial turnover in the membership of the County Commission since '97, but this is one of those issues that sets people off one way or the other. It's not so much a technical issue. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It would be good to have -- if we Page 42 16J1 August 2, 2001 were to do anything at all -- or if it were even appropriate for us to do anything -- is to have some guidance whether it's in the political ends or not. MR. ROELLIG: I think my comment would be, I don't think that the dogs on the beach would have an adverse impact on the coastal processes; that we could stipulate that and be off of our agenda pretty much. It's a -- it's an area that would generally fall outside of our purview once we stipulate that it would have no impact on the coastal issues. MR. ANDERSON: I might add there is a Parks and Recreation Advisory Board similar to this Coastal Advisory Committee, and the matter could be referred to them, you know, through Ms. Ramsey; so I'm sure anyone could, you know, make an inquiry to -- request that the action be considered before that board, you know, if there is interest. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Why don't we -- if it's amenable to everyone handle it that way; that we can as individuals, perhaps, contact Marsha (sic) Ramsey or even the commissioners themselves. And if there is some element of interest, we can take a look at it. We will bring it back again. MR. ANDERSON: Good. MR. STRAPPONI: Roy, I just have one question. MR. ANDERSON: Yes.. MR. STRAPPONI: The longstanding prohibition of pets on the beaches, I imagine, that excludes handicap and utility dogs or animals. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. I would think so, yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It does -- for sure, as a matter of city policy. MR. STRAPPONI: It does GALLEBERG: In other words, if you have a Page 43 16J1 August 2, 2001 seeing -eye dog, it's allowed on the beach. If there is nothing else for the moment, at least regarding pets on the beach, we have a couple of items. Under Item 7, new business. The first is a discussion regarding proposed field trips to our various coastal regions. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. At the last meeting, we had discussed the possibility of having some field trips in the near future. And we developed a suggestion -- suggested format which -- which we -- I believe, we have sent out to everyone. And basically what we are proposing is that in the next three months -- over the next three meetings, that those meetings could be held at field locations, one area being -- the first area being down in the Marco area and the second meeting being in the Barefoot Beach/Wiggins Pass /Vanderbilt area, the northern part; the third meeting being in the Naples Park Shore area. The concept would be that we could -- we could meet and have a meeting, say, around noontime. It could even be a lunch meeting. We could maybe have lunch, maybe 12 to 12:30 and then go into a meeting 1 to 1:30, let's say. And then starting at 1:30 -- it would be in a public location, a pavilion or some central location. And then at 1:30 to 4:30 we could go out in the field and view the beaches and the area and do that -- you know, basically that would be the format. Another option would be that we could -- we -- well, certainly there would be many options, but another possibility would be -- the one we have suggested here is actually where we will start out at nine in the morning and go until two in the morning (sic ) . We would actually do the fieldwork first and then have a meeting. Another option would be to start it at noontime and, you know, have the meeting and then have the field trip in the afternoon, so that would be one decision that we would want. I mean, the whole thing is really on the table. If you want to Page 44 16J1 August 2, 2001 hold this off for a few more months or -- but we thought it might be good to give -- to have these in the very -- you know, fairly not -too- distant future because, you know -- to get everyone familiar with all the various, you know, beaches in our county, so it's really before you for consideration. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any thoughts or comments? MR. PIRES: Mr. Chairman, I like -- I think the idea is good as far as having the opportunity for the field trips. I guess my only comments would be from the standpoint of the parameters of the conduct of the activity from the Sunshine Law. I think Mr. Anderson sort of alluded to that and referenced it to make sure we are operating well within the parameter of that whenever we engage in this activity. I'm not sure it will take this extent of time each day, five hours or not; that might be a little bit much. I would tend to favor the afternoon just from my own personal schedule from my thought standpoint. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MR. ROELLIG: The previous committee did this, and basically I think they spent maybe a couple of hours for the field trip and then had the meeting afterwards. So -- do you recall, Harry? I don't remember. It didn't run five hours. MR. HUBER: No. We just used this as a -- MR. ROELLIG: Right. I understand that. MR. HUBER: -- as an outside parameter. Yes. Yeah. I recollect the field observation, yeah, took several -- at least a minimum of two hours, I think, and then the meeting afterwards. But, yeah, I think most of the ones that we did we -- I think started around nine o'clock in the morning, and they were usually over with by noon. MR. ROELLIG: Right. Because we generally had a short agenda, and -- as far as I know, we were well within the Sunshine Page 45 16J1 August 2, 2001 Laws because it was advertised and the public was invited, and we had some members of the public, I don't remember, five or six or so. I think the public provided their own transportation, but the committee was, for the most part, on the city bus or something of that sort. And, you know, it seemed to work out fine. I think it's a very valuable thing to do. It's just a matter of whether we want to start right after Labor Day or what for the convenience of the board. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think it's a good idea as well, particularly for all of us as a group to see the various locations. I think it makes it a lot easier to deal with these issues and more advantageous. On the Sunshine -- I think we're talking sort of technical compliance rather than any great danger to the public or anything, but the county commission just. Had a meeting earlier this week up in Glades County, and I know they went to great lengths to go in separate vehicles and all of that stuff. I would just say that we ought to be sure that we are complying with Sunshine when we are in the van -- if we're in the van together -- that's where the trouble logistically could be. If we are on the beach, we can have a notice of public meeting on the beach. We would just have to ask, perhaps, the county attorney's office to give us guidance. Maybe it's just simpler in the end for all of us to drive there. I mean, we are not talking great distances, and we all manage to get here. We could probably all manage to get to two or three different locations. And I think it would be good to start sooner rather than later at the next meeting. MR. PIRES: Yeah. I tend to agree with you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Provide -- provided that we can clear the logistics -- or we can just have a consenus that we'll get -- we'll get notice of the exact location from the staff and all be responsible for getting ourselves there, which I personally think is easier than anything else. Page 46 16J1 August 2, 2001 MR. PIRES: I tend to agree. MR. ANDERSON: Is there -- seem to be -- is there a preference for mornings or afternoons? Would you prefer the afternoons over the mornings, let's say? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I don't -- unless someone disagrees, I don't see any reason why we wouldn't just meet at 1:30 wherever the location is, just as we're doing with these meetings. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We will just have three of them that aren't in chambers here. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. We will have a meeting, and then we will go from there. Sure. Okay. MR. STRAPPONI: Excuse me. Mr. Chairman, like yourself and Tony, I'm concerned about violations and compliance with the Sunshine Law, but I understand we are allowed to consult with staff and if the staff or the people who are going to bring us these various locations and show us -these projects and process and some of the impact that the storms have done and some of the issues we are going to have to pass judgment on, I think it's something that maybe we should have counsel look at. I don't know how you can get together as a group and make it totally public. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, we can. They -- we can do that part, because as long as you advertise the meeting, that the meeting will be held at the Naples Pier, then it's a public meeting. Indeed, we can all run around in a van together under the Sunshine Law provided we don't talk about business. However, when you do ' that, then, potentially one has to deal with, What did you talk about? it and proving a negative and all of that. For all of us -- and in my case, for sure, it's just not worth the potential grief. MR. PIKES: That's my concern. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We can -- and I do think the Page 47 16J1 August 2, 2001 county attorney might take a few minutes and give us guidance on this. It doesn't have to be in person but just to relate through the staff, you know, how we properly notice it and all of that type of thing, and we can hold our meeting. MR. SNEDIKER: You just said we all take our own vehicles. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: As long as we drive ourselves to the location that is advertised and -- MR. SNEDIKER: We have to have a court reporter or have the minutes -- the appropriate minutes taken. MR. PIRES: As the Chairman has indicated, I think if the county attorney's office gives some guidance as to the parameters -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. There is a way to do it. There is absolutely for sure a way to do it. We just need to make sure we are doing it correctly. MR. SNEDIKER: You do it in your own vehicles. MR. ANDERSON: I would think that everyone could come in their own vehicles. We will have the court reporter -- court recorder at the meeting, and we could -- when we go out in the field, the public could -- could come -- come along on the bus and the court reporter can be there. And it would just be a continuation of the meeting; so, yeah, that would be fine. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We will plan, then, on the way you have it listed here September 6th, Marco Island. We will do it at 1:30; however, just as with our normal meetings -- MR. ANDERSON: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- and naturally you will have to give us all specifics of the location. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. Very good. MR. SNEDIKER: Do we establish a meeting location at this time so everyone knows or mail that out to us? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'd be happy to do that. If Marco Page 48 16J1 August 2, 2001 is first -- we'll do that. MR. SNEDIKER: Nancy Richie. Nancy, what is your suggestion? You're from the City of Marco Island. MS. RICHIE: Yeah -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It would be better if you came to the mike, please, and stated your name. MR. SNEDIKER: Nancy is an employee of the City. MS. RICHIE: Hi. Nancy Richie, City of Marco Island. I do have a room reserved at Mackle Park for you on September 6th, in case you were going to decide today, and you can meet there at 1:30 if you want the meeting beforehand and go out to the beach or vice versa. It doesn't matter what you want to do then. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, let's congregate there. It's all a meeting -- MS. RICHIE: I think it would be easiest -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- under the rules. MS. RICHIE: Yeah. -- to congregate at -- Mackle Park is easily located. We can get a map to everybody. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MS. RICHIE 1:30 Mackle Park. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Very good. Thank you. Then, of course, we will plan on Barefoot Beach in the vicinity for October and Naples and Park Shore for November. We will settle those details in the future. Okay. The second item that we have under new business, we have two different requests for proposals. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. Harry, would you like to start that? MR. HUBER: Sure. Yeah. These are two of the items that I referred to before when Mr. Snediker asked the question that in trying to prepare and gear up for the projects we have got scheduled for next year. Page 49 16J1 August 2, 2001 The first one, the Professional Engineering Services for Coastal Zone Management Projects, the intent here is to get a number of consultants onboard to give us, you know, consulting services relative to all of our projects that we have scheduled next year and beyond. And so that -- that particular one I think I mailed out with the agenda. Also, I passed out today was the top sheet -- was the appointment letter for the selection committee and the notice on there Chairman Galleberg is on that selection committee. So I believe the projected schedule for that -- you notice in the RFP that was distributed the receipt of proposals is due -- or due on August 24th, and then I've projected a contract approval by the Board of County Commissioners by October 23rd. So if there is any way that we can shorten that time span, we certainly will, but I think that's -- from a realistic standpoint, I think that is probably what we are looking at. MR. PIKES: Mr.- Chairman. MR. HUBER: And what -- what will occur here, we will probably select a number of consultants, maybe three -- depends on how many submit proposals, and then we will get the board -- a board a contract of those three firms, and we will use those three firms -- like, if we have a specific project we are talking about -- and then we will get proposals from those three firms to do that work. And then we will issue -- select one of them, and issue a work order to them under the fixed -term contract. And I think in the RFP documents, I think this is for -- I think a two -year period and then we -- with the option for renewal for additional terms. Any questions on that particular one? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Pires. MR. PIKES: If I may briefly. Harry, I noticed when Ken Humiston and Humiston & Moore did their -- again, their Hideaway Page 50 16J1 August 2, 2001 Beach, April 2001, Incremental Beach Maintenance and Construction Report, they noted as a recommendation for the future that in getting sands from upland sources in the future, it's recommended that beach fill quantities from future truck hauling from upland sources be based on the volume capacity of the truck, in lieu of volumes based on a unit weight to volume ratio. And not having had a chance to review the bid specs for the beach - compatible sand, do you know if this recommendation as to how to measure beach fill quantities -- was that incorporated into these specs? MR. HUBER: Yeah. Well, I was getting ready to go into that particular document. We were discussing the engineering surveys. MR. PIKES: I'm sorry. I thought we were on the beach - compatible sand. I'm sorry about that. MR. HUBER: Mr. Roellig. MR. ROELLIG: Yes. The question on the -- if we end up with these three firms, are these firms available to everybody in the county government then? They are not just strictly for your utilities department? MR. HUBER: No. These three firms will be strictly for coastal zone management projects; that's what this RFP is for, that we are going to make a selection of firms to provide services related to coastal zone management projects. We have a number of fixed -term engineering contracts for -- for other purposes. MR. ROELLIG: I see. But this will be for any coastal project? MR. HUBER: Yes. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I just have one comment, and that's sort of in the nature of a typo. On the memorandum to Mr. 011iff concerning the fixed -term professional services, it says in the second line a five- member selection committee, and then we have six people listed. Page 51 16J1 August 2, 2001 MR. HUBER: The one from the purchasing department is non- voting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Oh, non - voting. Okay. I see that now. And this is in terms of this committee this is simply an informational item; correct? Mr. 011iff will authorize this, and then ultimately the board will -- MR. HUBER: Actually, he already has. I did not have the signed copy, but -- he had to approve that before we distributed the package. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So no action is required by us? MR. HUBER: No. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Very good. That concludes that new business. MR. HUBER: Well -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Next on the -- oh, it doesn't conclude -- MR. HUBER: We have that one more, that other RFP, which. is for beach -- the protection of the beach - compatible sand. And, there again, your question, Tony, we will be going out with a separate -- this is just for the production of the sand. Okay? Then we will be going out -- and, in fact, I'm preparing those documents right now for the transport and the placement of the sand. So I think your question comes into play during that process, if I'm not mistaken. If you want to repeat that question. MR. PIRES: Yes. I guess -- I'm sorry I jumped ahead before, Harry. I apologize. In the Humiston & Moore Hideaway Beach Naples 2001 post - construction report, Incremental Beach Maintenance Report, they made a recommendation that "due to variability and moisture content of sand from upland sources, which has a significant effect on the weight to volume ratio, it's recommended beach -fill quantities from future truck hauling from Page s2 16J1 August 2, 2001 upland sources be based on the volume capacity of the truck, in lieu of volumes on a unit weight to volume ratio." I didn't know if that criteria was made part of the specifications for the beach - compatible sand. MR. HUBER: Well, there again, that will be part of the specifications for the upcoming RFP for the transport and placement of the fill. Like I said, this particular RFP that I distributed to you today is just for the production at the mine, so then we will have a separate selection for the contract that -- and transport the material that is produced -- transport it from that location to the beach and actually place it on the beach; that's what he's talking about is -- is -- rather than basing the unit cost on a weight, but base it on the volume of the truck. MR. PIKES: I guess possibly, though, maybe I misunderstand, but if we are talking about a certain capacity -- tonnage capacity, I think, is in the beach - compatible contract, RFP? MR. HUBER: Yes. MR. PIKES: It indicates, in fact, in here there is a range of, you know, cubic yard will have depending on 1.9 to 1.29 tons. I guess it would depend upon the moisture content. MR. HUBER: Yes. MR. ANDERSON: Would it be significant to be part of the beach - compatible sand production contract. MR. HUBER: Of course, the -- we've -- I think it would be from probably -- you are going to have certain variations either way you do it. I think we probably would come the closest, would be more accurate by using the weight, in my estimation. Because if you try to do by volume, it depends -- if they don't load the truck up to its full capacity, you know -- if you are going to have to measure that. Truckload every time -- you know, it's not very practical. And I think from an accuracy standpoint, I think, even though it might be a Page 53 16J1 August 2, 2001 slight variation in the moisture content and what have you, it's not going to be enough -- I think that's something that we are going to have to look at real closely when we finalize these specifications as to which way we ga. But like I say, you will find basing it on the weight is going to be just as accurate as if you are going to base it on the volume of the truck. MR. PIRES: Yeah. I was sort of thinking the same thing as you. I mean, you have a truck, and is it topped off or leveled off or -- MR. HUBER: But weighing -- MR. PIKES: -- from the standpoint of the volume -- MR. HUBER: Weighing it there is no question as to how much it weighs, and then base the unit cost on per ton. And then -- I mean, all -- as far as converting it to cubic yards, as far as how many cubic yards do you have on the beach, you know, if you have -- if you are within a certain range -- I think it's going to be close enough as far as determining what volume we actually placed on the beach. In fact, we can even survey that after we place it on the beach. But I think for payment purposes I think we are much better off using a weight parameter. MR. PIKES: Easier to track. MR. HUBER: Right. MR. PIKES: Thank you. I just wanted to know the basis for the bid specs and whether or not this was incorporated. MR. ROELLIG: Well, some as much as 30 percent, would you be -- would you be testing the sand for moisture so you know how much cubic yard would weight? There has got to be -- I mean, there is a way, of course, to test it to find out what the -- what the correction factor would be, so -- MR. HUBER: Sure, we can do that. Assuming that the sand is going to be produced in advance of this trucking it to the site, and we certainly could determine the conversion factor to cubic yards per ton Page 54 16J1 August 2, 2001 prior to transporting it. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. HUBER: Unless, of course, you know, if you got -- let's just say when we started hauling it the sand was dry but then halfway through the -- that operation of the transporting it to the beach, you had a couple of days where it rained and everything; that is going to naturally change the moisture consent. MR. ROELLIG: But generally the moisture content is pretty easy to determine, so you could do it on a daily basis, if necessary, I would think. I'm a little uncomfortable with the 30 percent range as far as, you know, what you end up by buying it by the ton versus by the yard. I realize it can be sort of a problem, but I think, you know, the inspectors could see whether or not the trucks were carrying the proper yardage. It would just seem kind of odd you would pay for so many tons and so many yards, you know, but ... MR. HUBER: Either way we are going to -- I don't think we are going -- based on the proposals we are asking for right now, I think they are going to be consistent both ways. We will either go one way or the other -- MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. HUBER: -- for both of them. MR. ANDERSON: One other thing I wanted to point out, Mr. Chairman, is that the -- we're -- we're adding some language in these specifications to conduct some bacterial -- bacterialogical testing because there has been an issue of water quality at the beaches. But just to -- our indication is that it's not really due to the sand -- because we have done some testing -- but we think it would be in an abundance of caution to add some testing requirements to the sand as part of the other quality criteria for the sand that is supplied at the beaches. So I just wanted to mention we will be putting that language into the specification as well. Page 55 16J1 August 2, 2001 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Very good. MR. STRAPPONI: Mr. Chairman. MR. SNEDIKER: Go ahead. MR. STRAPPONI: There has been a couple of articles in the newspaper recently in regards to what Roy just referred to. And the Department of Engineering supervisor, Mr. Dennis, had made some comments about the fact that the bacteria count in upland sand that was placed at two locations appeared to be higher, although he didn't strictly point his finger at that. I wonder if we would be out of line to request that Mr. Dennis address this board and give us a briefing as to what his findings have been and, you know, why he has this position. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think -- Mr. Dennis, I'm not familiar with him. Did you say he's on the county staff? MR. STRAPPONI: Apparently. DR. STAIGER: He's with the Collier County Public Health Unit. He's -- he's in charge of environment engineering for the health unit. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I clearly think that's within our writ, and it may be -- may be several months if we are going to be taking our field trips for the next three. I think it would be helpful to hear from him. And, indeed, with the few months for the data that, perhaps, will get more definite information from him. MR. PIRES: And possibly the timing might be appropriate because our first field trip is down at Marco. This involves Hideaway Beach, I think, so maybe if we can limit it to just a five - minute presentation down there. MR. MUDD: I can help you a little bit. Jim Mudd, for the record, Public Utilities Administrator. As soon as I saw the article, I had pollution control go in there and check both places on Park Shore and down at Barefoot where we put that sand, plus to go back to the sand pile and do tests, okay. The tests that he took, basically, didn't Page 56 16J1 August 2, 2001 show any elevation of bacterial count in that process. Pretty much was mundane. So I went back to make sure -- I said, you know, "It seems a little weird to me that nobody has brought that up yet, " so I had our folks go do that. And part of that request -- our folks do have the capability to do those, the bacterial counts, in that process. So we are going to make sure that we head this off -- this public- relations issue off at the pass before it shows back up in the headline, because as far as we're concern and what we saw after the fact, there is no basis for it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So the county does ongoing testing, and in this incident that Mr. Strapponi is referring to is more -- more or less a false alarm. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. The next issue I'd say in those two, to let you know, we have been kind of hostages as far as our contracts have been concerned in the past. It was alluded to earlier. First one for the indefinite delivery and indefinite quantity for the engineering firms, so we are looking for multiple firms so we are not stuck with one. The other issue that you heard Harry allude to is the fact that if we get a job we're going to go out to those three firms, even though the bid into the IDIQ, and we are going to ask them to give us an estimate, okay, so that we can get a better price. So you are not just stuck with one. "This is what you have got, and this is what you are going to pay for. And, Oh, by the way, the government estimate is exactly what you get with 10 percent -- a little added to the process." I'm not saying that happens all the time, but I have seen it quite a number of times happen in this county already. The other issues on the sand is that you are going to get multiple vendors. Okay. If you take a look at the Jhana contract that we just ran with the 41, 000 cubic yards that we put on the beach, if you take a look at the transportation and the cost of producing the sand, you'll find out it breaks out one -third to produce the sand and two- thirds to Page s7 16J1 August 2, 2001 transport. One of the reasons we wanted to go to multiple vendors is because you get them at different locations. And if two -- 66 percent of your cost or thereabouts is going to be for transportation, you might pay a higher cost to produce the sand at a small quarry that is closer in but save money on the transportation cost on the end. And in the long run that particular quarry site -- even though you pay higher for the sand to be produced, it meets the requirements in the S curves that Mr. Snediker alluded to earlier. We get a better price. And then you can go to a cheaper sand production, okay, even further out. And you are going to get to certain firms can only produce so much,, and that's what we found out with the Jhana Company of the kind that we really wanted, they could only produce about a third of what we needed. But we need the whole 55 -- or excuse me, 50, 000 cubic yards, so we went to a less quality type of sand and - -„ and that's what we got on the beach in Park Shore and down at Barefoot. So I would say having multiple vendors gives you the opportunity to get that Grade A sand that you want. We'll be able to test it. We'll be about to get S -test to test it. Yes, it will cost a little bit different, but you've also got to put in the transportation cost into that equation to -- to roll it out so that you've got the whole deal and not just the part to what the sand cost to produce. So don't hone into the cheapest price. You've got to bring the transportation element in. And when that is done, then you can ID the vendor that you want to use first. MR. STRAPPONI: I think the concern on the transportation is that if we are paying by weight as opposed to volume, a third of -- two- thirds of the total cost would be substantial. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. We will take a look at that. Your comments are well taken -- well noticed, and we will get in that process to make sure that we don't get gypped. Page 58 16J1 August 2, 2001 MR. SNEDIKER: Mr. Chairman, I would like to point out one thing. As I read this, no member of this committee will have anything to do with the -- seeing the sand, feeling the sand at all that is going to be purchased. Now, last winter just got -- got into just a horrible situation in trying to determine what sand. It got out of control last year. But I'm wondering do we want to -- all of us give up that idea of seeing the sand or knowing exactly what sand is being purchased. Sand is a very, very delicate issue in this county. Do we want to pass that on to other people? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that -- MR. SNEDIKER: As I read this, we are passing it on. We will not know what the sand it. MR. STRAPPONI: I think, Jim, at a previous meeting that you may not have attended, offered to bring samples in. This committee or its predecessor has certainly gotten some bad press in the past, and that was the reason why I was particularly concerned about the bacteria content of the sand, in addition to the quality of the sand. But maybe you want to expand on that. You did offer to bring samples of that -- MR. MUDD: You are -- you are going to see the sand. You are going to touch the sand. You are going to see the stats and the test on the sand -- MR. SNEDIKER: We are? MR. MUDD: -- before we award any contract. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You are specing it out according to the specifications that were preferred last time around; correct? MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. You will get to go through that whole process. MR. SNEDIKER: As I read this, we did not. MR. MUDD: We are not going down that road. We understand Page 59 16J1 August 2, 2001 that it's a delicate situation, okay. We are not going to put something -- there has been too many instances where stuff has hit the beach -- MR. SNEDIKER: Right. MR. MUDD: -- okay, that everyone hasn't -- you really need to have a lot of people's eyes on target to make sure it's right. MR. SNEDIKER: Thank you. MR. MUDD: You represent the people. You need to see the sand, and you will have that opportunity. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. To the bacteria, Mr. Strapponi if that, apparently, was something of a false alarm, I don't know that we should have the gentleman come in or not. How do you feel about that? MR. STRAPPONI: Should we have a press release as to what the current status of that is after looking into it? I'm concerned about the public perception. You know, the committee that preceded this one had a problem with the rocks on the beach, and now we have got a deal with that. So I think it's important that we -- the public gets both point of views in terms of the quality of the sand -- MR. PIKES: Hopefully Eric Staats, who is sitting in the back from the Naples Daily News, will give. Prominent attention to that in his news stories -- emphasis, hopefully. MR. ROELLIG: I have looked at many sources -- beach sand sources in my career, and I have never run into that problem, except one time when it turned out that taking sand out of a -- basically an abandoned pit that the septic tank was being dumped into by the haulers. I have never run into that problem in any location in the country, so it will be extraordinarily rare to run the bacteria -- (Mr. Pires exits meeting.) MR. ROELLIG: -- as long as we keep out the honey zippers, I don't think that will be a problem. MR. ANDERSON: Another option, Mr. Chairman, is that we Page 60 16J1 August 2, 2001 could draft, like, a press release for your signature to send into the local media, if you like. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That we are against bacteria in the sand? No. If it turned out a false report, I'm not -- you know, there were rocks on the beach. There was something to address. If there isn't -- and we obviously hope there won't be -- and it's good that the county is taking safeguards and will be monitoring bacteria in the sand. It would seem at this point there isn't anything to address. MR. ANDERSON: Yeah, that's right. It was somewhat speculative on the part of the newspaper, and the -- there wasn't any -- it was just mentioned as speculation. And then the next day the tests turned out okay, and the beach never was closed. So, yeah, you are right; there wasn't any real event that occurred. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you, then. If we are finished with the RFPs, if there is nothing else, we move on, to public comment, if there is any. If anyone in the public would like to address us, now is the time. MR. STRAPPONI: Mr. Chairman, I would like to bring up some new business. If I may, I had a question. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Sure. MR. STRAPPONI: I will try and make it brief. Once again, in the newspaper there has been some articles about the potential to purchase some beachfront property. The TDC, apparently, is looking to fund this purchase. My concern is what impact that's going to have on the CAC's budget and whether or not the CAC will be kept abreast or get involved in the progress of that potential purchase. And apparently there is -- the commission is spending -- has put up the funds for an independent appraisal on the property. And I would be curious as to when that's done if we can get a copy of it. MR. MUDD: Backup, Roy. When I -- for the record, Jim Mudd again. I talked to Leo Ochs about the beachfront property and Page 61 16J1 August 2, 2001 that process as it came along. You have a ten -year plan with certain things broken out between parks and rec -- in Category A between parks and rec and what the CAC is going to recommend and use as that process. I looked at Leo and I said, "Okay, Leo, if you are going to do this, and I don't have an estimate yet, there are some things that you need to move on your ten -year plan to make sure that the reserves are capable." Because, if you remember, the ten -year plan around 2006, we get real tight around $450, 000 in the reserves before we get that next -year buildup, and that has everything to do with the garage -- a second garage that he estimates that could go in. I said, "If you are thinking about making that purchase, you need to adjust a little bit." So I'm keeping an eye on what that cost is and where that process is and what he's going to do with his figures. And if it impacts into this particular committee's jurisdiction or funds in that process, then outside of what is in reserve that we know about right now, then, yeah, we will bring it to your attention. We will bring the whole issue to your attention so that you know exactly the full -cost accounting of the entire process. I have asked him to be very careful and to work within his -- within his range of dollars that he has got in that ten -year plan to adjust so that he can get to it. If, for instance, there are some things that he can postpone or push off until 2008, 2009, you will notice there are great sums of money in that reserve to the tune of eight to ten million dollars that he can get to without impacting the stuff up front. So I'm -- I'm asking him to take a look at his projects, his long term, in order to move things around and orchestrate that a little bit. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But if that were to come to pass, would it come out of the same class of TDC funds, or aren't we in our section or class or something? MR. MUDD: Sir, I wish -- it's not clean. Category A is not clean, because it does have some beach- access stuff to it, and that's Page 62 16J1 August 2, 2001 not -- I have not talked to the attorneys exactly what fund it will come out. But I know Mr. Ochs, who is the -- who's the public services administrator is the person that is working that acquisition. The only dollars that he's getting come out of Category A, which we touch. How that is all going to break down I don't know. But I'm watching it, okay, because I have the same -- I have the same cautious attitude that you do. Okay. There are certain things that need to happen to the beach as far as restoration is concerned, and how those dollars are divided we have to do it smartly. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Clearly, we would like to weigh to it. I'm sure you will bring it to us if there is an impact on the restoration funds. MR. MUDD: Yes, sir. Sure. What we will do -- as an update on old business, we will just give you the current status of that process as we go along. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. That could be something very important. Any of the members have anything else? If not, we will next meet on September 6th, Marco Island, Special Field Trip Meeting. With that, this meeting is adjourned. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 3:45 p.m. Page 63 16J1 August 2, 2001 COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE GARY GALLEBERG, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY EMILY C. UNDERWOOD, RPR. Page 64 Fiaa Ca He0MI1111- Maac'Kie Coletta BavlAore Beautificatio" M.S.T.V. Advisory Committee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 September 5, 2001 I. The meeting was called to order by Bill Neal at 4:07 PM. II. ATTENDANCE: A. Members: Bill Neal, Tom Briscoe, Mike Bruet and Maurice Gutierrez were present. Jean Carpenter was absent. B. Collier County: Bob Petersen and Val Prince, DOT Landscape Operations C. Other: Rev. William Gianola; Sandra King, Vice Chair of CRV; Allen Jost, Manpower Secretarial Services. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was moved by Mike Bruet and seconded by Maurice Gutierrez to approve the minutes of the meeting of August 1, 2001. Carried unanimously. IV. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Budget Report: Bob Petersen handed out the Fund 160 budget as of September 4, 2001 and attached to it was an Operating Expense Summary and a Capital Outlay Summary. Bill Neal stated that he has never been able to read the budget in the five years he was on the committee. Bob Petersen stated that Mike assured him that as of October 1st they would be changed and much easier to read. Bill Neal asked how much the committee had left to spend. Bob Petersen stated that the last page shows the operating budget has $101,069.16 left to spend minus any additional operating expenses yet to come up. Bill Neal stated that we should know if there are any current obligations against that. Val Prince stated that there was still the outstanding three month maintenance contract of $48,363 that would be charged against that which would pay it up to October 1st. Next years contract is out to bid and there were two companies that attended the pre -bid conference today. They were Commercial Land Maintenance and Landscape Florida. Both companies had experience with doing the maintenance and wanted to stress the amount of detail that is involved in maintaining Bayshore Drive. In addition there will be some charges coming out of the Capital Budget for the hiring of an Engineer Consultant for the bridge. Right now the purchase order is cut for $3,350 for a preliminary study to see idl's: are with the bridge. Because Botner discontinued his services at the point Date: Item# t (.q � Copies To: 16J1 where the pavilions were removed, we have no engineering that has determined that the bridge is safe. Details will be given later in the meeting at the time Pam Lulich was scheduled to give her report in Old Business. Bob Petersen discussed the repair of the pavers. He said that there was an estimate of about $16,000 to do the repairs to the pavers. The committee should not have to end up eating any of that cost. There will be a meeting with the contractors to determine who is responsible for the damage so that it can be charged back to them. Some of the damages will probably be included in the damages that will be sought as a claim against Mr. Botner's liability insurance since he was responsible to see that the compaction and inspections were done so that this would not have happened. Bob recommended that the committee, for the purposes of safety, go ahead and get the sidewalk fixed now rather than wait to get the money back from the responsible persons. This amount would come out of the capital budget. Bill Neal said to let the minutes show that Tom questioned this. He then stated that we have contracts with certain people, who have not completed their job to our satisfaction, and we are going to go ahead and pay for that work and then go and try to get it back. He questioned why the committee even consider paying this when the people who have control of the contracts paid that in full before insuring that the contingencies were met. He asked who was responsible for this. Bob Petersen stated that it was Mr. Botner, your project manager. Bill Neal said that Mr. Botner was hired because the county staff was not moving along with the project. We hired him to work in liaison with the county to get the project done. He said that we have been trying to get the bridge done for over a year and we have had every stumbling block place in front of us. To sum it up, we did not hire George Botner to take over the counties responsibility. We only hired him to work in liaison with the county to make sure that the plans met all the laws and restrictions. Bob Peterson reminded Bill Neal that he was present at the meeting in Tom 011iffs conference room where the 12 point contract or agreement was approved with Mr. Botner. Bob said he was only to shuffle the papers and that Bill agreed to it. Bill Neal said he did not agree to that, what he agreed to do was have Mr. Botner supervise the project. This did not mean that the county could bail out of all their responsibility. Botner did not have full control of what was being done. He had to subscribe to all the policies and procedures of the county and we should not have let it be done. Bob Petersen said that he tried to tell Bill that but he replied that we could not have this project held up any longer. Bill Neal denied this and said that Botner and your department head were Arguing constantly about the plans. He said he sat in meetings where your department head walked out of three meetings. Very unprofessional and I have told this to him before. You guys, county and Botner couldn't come to agreement on whatever, whatever. This committee sat here in limbo 2 16J1 hoping that somewhere along the line this project would be kicked off. We discussed what we could do to get it going and someone said that we could hire a project manager. Now let me ask you, do you have any project manager on any project that has total control to violate county laws and regulations? Bob Petersen said it was the first for him. He was told by John Dunnik, the Assistant County Manager personally and that not only him but also Linwood in purchasing, code enforcement, utilities and right of way inspectors were told the same thing. We were told not to let anything to stop or slow this project. Bill Neal asked why would any county encourage the violation of their own laws. If John Dunnik did that he was wrong. Bob Petersen said we don't disagree. He said that it could not be built this way but was told you cannot stop this project. Bill Neal said that this committee was led to believe that the project manager and the county were communicating with each other. He said he was frustrated with the progress and went to 011iff and said we have to do something on Bayshore. That's when we came up with that agreement to let Botner supervise the project. Bob Petersen said that was at the same time that staff was recommending that you terminate his other contract and let us build it. Bill Neal said that the reason that they didn't do that was because the project had been mishandled and bogged down for over a year then, fighting between the Public Utilities, the Purchasing Department and the Roads Department. If you go back and read the memo's you will find that there was constant disagreement and arguments between George Botner and Ed Kant. Bob Petersen said that he knew that Mr. Botner promised you a lot of things that were not possible timewise. It was pointed out by Dan DeCesare........... Bill Neal interrupted to say that Dan DeCesare was the guy who walked out of the meeting ........ Bob Petersen said that he tried to tell George what was involved as far as permitting and inspections and reviews of plans and how long it takes to get those things through and then how long it takes to get to the Board of County Commissioners. Bill Neal said that it seems like George Botner is the focal point of everything that has gone wrong with this project. Bob Petersen said he could not answer that. I only know that poor design is the cause of your sight line problems and the cause of your bridge safety issues. Bill Neal said that he sat in a meeting with Val Prince and George Botner with Kant as the mediator, because they were arguing about sight lines. The last comment I heard when I asked as I walked and asked, `Are you in agreement with these sightlines ?' and they said, yes, they agree. Val Prince stated that if that was the meeting where Ed Kant left then the understanding was that Botner was going to accept the liability and pay the cost to correct the sightline and visibility problems. That was in a memo and submitted to the committee and made a part of the minutes. Bill Neal said he had not seen in the minutes. You mean that this committee agreed that Botner could violate county codes and regulations? Val didn't feel that they had. He said that the staff felt very frustrated that 3 16J1 they could not get the project done too. Bill said there was constant arguing between, Purchasing, Public Works, Roads and Botner and that was what was holding it up. Val said that it was because he would not follow instructions. Bill Neal said that no matter what he suggested there was always a problem. It is like the bridge. If you go back to the minutes you will find that the bidding will occur this month and next month this will be done and next month that will be done and it never seems to get done. It has dragged on all year long too. He said that he was not condemning or criticizing you guys (referring to Bob Petersen and Val Prince) but when I talk to Tom 011iff and Pam Lulich I am going to say that this committee did not encourage George Botner to violate any rule or regulation but we are concerned why the county would let that go and do nothing about it. If John Dunnik took it upon himself to say let that project alone, I ask you how in the world can anyone in the county say to a project manager we don't care what regulation you violate. You can't do that. Val Prince said that in this particular case we were told to leave it alone. Bill Neal said that then his problem will be with the guys above you then. Val said that their main and only concern was to keep this project going and to do it safely, do it properly, follow the guidelines and get the plans squared away and to get it done right. Bill Neal said he understood what Val was saying and that it was a point of frustration that you wanted to get it done. He said that it was total frustration after months and months and months of work and getting nothing done. We would never have gone to a Commissioner and I never go over anyone in the organization unless I feel that its important and necessary. Up to now I have never said anything about the bridge to any of them yet, but a year is enough. I want you to know that there are letters in here about Bayshore plant removal, that if you look in our minutes it says one thing and if you look at the letter from Bob Petersen to Ed Kant it says something else and I will take this up with Bob. We were concerned at the last meeting about plants being removed, going against the plan that was agreed and accepted by the county office, we were in meetings with our taxpayer where these plans were presented and people voted on them. We were under the impression that we all agreed on this. Where did it go wrong? Bob Petersen said, that the plans voted on by the public were conceptual plans and during the same time Mr. Botner was doing the design on 41 North. We had to do three reviews and Peter Hayden, the project manager for a short time hired Wilson Miller to project manage that to oversee George. After three design reviews of those plans for 41 North, and this included Bryan Dennis, FDOT and Wilson Miller, that after those reviews the plans had still not been fixed. He went on to say that the county has never misinformed you as far as anything I can see or read in the memos or minutes but I cannot say that is true from the design professional side. 4 16J1 Bill Neal said that I can safely tell you that all we ran into was constant problems. We had five project managers. Even before we had Botner there was constant problems with the county and the project manager. That is history but like right now I am looking at these numbers. I cannot tell you how many tax dollars we collected for three years, I cannot tell you how many dollars we spent against those tax dollars. This is supposed to be a budget and summary but there is no way we even know how many dollars we spent and how many dollars we collected. I been asking the budget office for that ever since we had this committee. We need to know and now there is no one here from the budget department when we need to know how much we can change the millage, and we are committed to change that millage. We have no way to know because we are shooting in the dark. This is a crucial meeting, it is a budget meeting and it is a tax cut meeting, it is a meeting to say how many dollars we are going to need next year and how we are going to arrive at that. Bill Neal told Bob Petersen that he knows how hard he has worked since he has been there and that he got a lot of things done, but I see us tied down again to bureaucratic, administrative roadblocks. Now you tell us we are going to hire an engineer for this bridge. Weren't the plans already accepted? If not, why weren't they accepted? Val Prince said they were never sealed. Botner did not, well...... Bob Petersen said that Botner had discontinued his contract with Kris Jain Associates and he even refused or didn't pay his last invoice from Mr. Jain. Mr Jain was the original engineer who did the original design. Mr. Botner chose to not continue using him and we don't know who continued the design. A letter from Kris Jain & Associates dated August 30, 2001 was handed out showing the timeline of the bridge. Bob said that if you notice their services were discontinued on August 14, 2000 but the plans for the new bridge were submitted on August 17, 2000 but as far as could be determined they were not drawn up by an engineer. If you read on in the letter it points out some of the failures such as the railing, spaces in the railing, the fact that the sink holes are not in the posts. These are things that must be worked out before we build the bridge and we will not be rushed into a building a bridge that is unsafe. Bill Neal said he knew that and that this guy will probably pass away and we will have to call in another engineer to check his work. Bob Petersen said he had scheduled Mr. Jain to come to talk at next meeting. Bill said that we need to get the bridge going. Now, do I go back to Dunnick and say call everybody off and violate all the rules of the county and go build a bridge? Bob Petersen said that if you want an unsafe bridge you could do that. Bill said that he didn't want anything unsafe but that he just wanted the project finished and not be like the Gordon River Bridge. Bob Petersen said that our attorneys are reviewing the forms. We cannot start the bridge until your funding is in line unless you want to loose the $200,000 from the state. Bill Neal said that we have been hearing that 5 16J1 since January. Can you understand the frustration we are going through. We have been promising the taxpayer since last October that the bridge would be completed in October and now it has gone a whole year past that. I want you to get MOT to approve whatever has to be approved and get it it done so that we can get on with the completion of the bridge. In January and February you said it would be a short time but each time it isn't done. Bob said that he was also told that, but each time there were new forms that had to be done. He said it was very frustrating for him too, especially because he had to come on the first Wednesday each month and listen to this. Bill Neal said that each month we have complimented you on these things but this month we are asking why can't we get something done. Bob said we are having your bridge inspected so that it is safe. Someone said, `And we have to pay for that, was that not in Bowers proposal ?' Bob said it was and that was part of the package that Kelsey Ward in purchasing was putting together to go against his liability insurance. Bill Neal said that it is very interesting that we had to change the specifications on the bridge because Botner did them wrong. We had to change the specifications on the site lines because Botner did them wrong. We had to change the specifications on the landscaping because Botner did them wrong. Everything that we talked about in this guy, that we hired to do this job, apparently wasn't done right. Val Prince agreed. Bill said that someone in the county should have said to us that we need to change this guy. We went through a process where we were talking about doing it and then the county and Botner got together and said no, they could work out their problems. Bob Petersen said that we have been pointing out these problems. Bill said that he had a lot of correspondence that went back and forth between departments that this committee was not aware of Bob said that correspondence was to try to explain some of the statements you made in the last meeting and were in the minutes. Staff felt you needed more information about what actually happened and what was said. Bill said can you point out any case where the line of site requirements are violated. Bob said that any place where a left turn is being made and you cannot see the oncoming traffic there is a violation. Val said that every tree on Bayshore violated because of the caliper. The staff advised the design architect that they were in violation but he refused to comply with our request. Bill said that the county staff should not have let any of this proceed if they were in violation. We are responsible for spending the taxpayer money and I be damned if I would have let it be spent if we had known that it was going to be pulled up after we planted it. Guys, the only good a MSTU is, is to collect the taxes because we have no control. Bob said that the committee has a lot more control that you are taking credit for. It is because of the pushing of this committee that staff was forced to sit and not make the changes that should have been made. There was not that much of a hurry that you could have waited a month or 3 16J1 two to get it made proper. Bill said they did and they waited months and months and it never happened. Bob said not after he got there and if you read every report that Val wrote he stated about the site line problems and if you read Mr. Botners reply he denied that they had to meet the FDOT standard because it was just a small collector road. Bill asked if Botner was wrong and Bob said that he was and that they had tried to convince the committee of that. Bill stated that he heard at the meeting that Val and and George Botner were in agreement. Val said they were in agreement that Botner would assume total liablility for any cost incurred because of the plantings, however later Botner said in a letter that rejects that he accepted that responsibility. Bill Neal said this could have been such a nice smooth project except for the vendetta between the architect and the county. The committee was ready to kick both of you out except we couldn't do it. Bob said that you had staff saying you shouldn't design it this way because it isn't safe, and you have a design professional saying he is going to design it the way he wants. Bill said then if I was a design professional in this town I could get by with anything I want. Val said that seems to be true. You take Vanderbilt Beach Drive, Vanderbilt Beach Road, North 41, Davis Boulevard Phase I and II, Bayshore and Fiddlers Creek and that gentleman did whatever he wanted to do. Tom Briscoe said that why in the world would it go that long. Once, twice and three times you're a real sucker. Bob said they tried to stop from awarding the RFP to Mr. Botner but he went over everybody's head by complaining to Ed Elsnore, former Utilities Director who then reversed the committee that made that decision and awarded it to him anyway. At that time Transportation was under Utilities. Bob said he stopped it from being awarded the second time and Botner protested it, but then left town when he realized that he would not get the award. Bill Neal read a letter from George Botner to the County Manager, dated August 13, 2001 which was made a part of the minutes. It was the latest attempt to collect the $673.50 that he feels is due on his contract. Previous correspondence leading up to this letter is also attached. Bill Neal said that Botner claimed that he received approval from both Petersen and Prince on their last survey of the project. The question of when the lights could be put in was brought up. Bob Petersen said that he was drafting an Executive Summary to Sole Source their acquisition however even then they would not be available until the last part of October. Mike Bruet made a motion that the process of securing the lights be given the go ahead. It was seconded by Maurice Gutierrez. Motion carried, three votes for with Tom Briscoe voting against it. Bill Neal said the lights will not be here until the middle or late October. Bob Petersen said we can have Simmons start pulling the wire as soon as the contract year begins and that he would take care of that. Bill Neal asked about the lights on the existing lights on the bridge. Bob Petersen said they were not UL approved and could not be used. The 7 16J1 question was raised as to how they could be used. It was put on the Agenda for next month when a decision would be made as to where they should be donated. The bridge subject was brought up again. Mike Bruet moved to authorize $4,000 to pay the engineer to review the plans and make sure the design is okay, that it is buildable the way it is but that should the county be successful in its suit against Mr. Botner that we would like to be reimbursed. Maurice Gutierrez seconded. Unanimous approval. It was asked what kind of schedule the bridge would be on. Bob Petersen said that he was assured by the County Attorney's office that he should have the Lap Agreement, which allows us to proceed with construction, back this week. If that happens I can get it to the State and Bryan Dennis said that the State Attorney should be able to sign off on it in about two to three weeks time. At that point we can start building the bridge providing that Kris Jain has the design ready to go. If everything goes as scheduled the target date to start construction is October 1St. Bob stated that we will have to go out to bid again but we will use annual contractors who will not want to work with their old bid since the design may have changed. Also it might require that we have Board approval since it is $160,000. V. COMMITTEE MEMBERS REPORT: None VI. OLD BUSINESS: A. Report from Pam Lulich: Subject covered by Bob Petersen during the Transportation Services Report. B. Light at Lakeview: Bob Petersen said he had requested a survey to be done to determine the probability of a traffic light being put on Lakeview. This normally takes several months to be done and is dependent on what is called the seven warrants. C. Millage Rate for 2002: Bill Neal said that this is a particulary important decision to make and we have no representation from the Budget Office. Bob Petersen reviewed some of the unknowns that are projected for next year. He suggested the committee hold to a reduction of 1 mill, bringing the rate to 2 mills. Bill asked what the amount of dollars was coming in with the current rate. Bob stated that 3 mills was bringing in $661,000 and reducing it to 2 mills would still give you 440,000. With the requirement of $160,000 in lights, a $200,000 maintenance contract, plus your water, fertilizer and mowing for next year, you are close. Maurice Gutierrez moved to reduce the millage rate to 2 mills. Seconded by Tom Briscoe. Mike Bruet voted nay. Motion carried 3 to 1. Bill Neal said that it is important to include in the minutes that we would have liked to reduce the millage rate to one and a half but because of the absence of information from the County Budget Office we could not take a chance to do so. D. Introduction of Documentation to Refute Allegations: Mike Bruet moved that the attachments that accompanied the minutes of September 5, 2001 16J1 be made an official part of those minutes. Seconded by Maurice Gutierrez. Motion carried unanimously. VII. NEW BUSINESS: None VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Sharon King suggested that the Bridge Lamps be donated to the CRA. Bill Neal said that would be added to the next months agenda. Ms. King asked about the six packages for maintenance that were sent out. Bob Petersen said that the bid was advertised and the means of how to get on it. He said the bid was open until September 19, 2001. Ms. King said she was amazed to hear that this committee is working without proper financial knowledge that is up to date and current. Bob explained that the way the county budget works is that it ends on September 30`" and begins again on October 1 ". The committee does know how much it has but the difficulty is in understanding the report that is given to them. The balance of the money is carried forward to next year. IX. ADJOURNMENT: Bill Neal adjourned the meeting at 6:02 PM The next meeting is scheduled for 4:00 PM, Wednesday October 3, 2001 at the Collier County Department of Transportation Operation Office 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 9 t S N O � H U O O N M o U O .r 16 ,11 4 W J CO N gZ a� LL a O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 O O O 00 O O 0 0 O O c1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O p O O O 0 0 0 O OO 00 D (D r O O O O O O t0 O O u) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O O r 0 0 V O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O M M (D o O M r M O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O m r W 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 (n 0 0 0 00 c/ O O O N m co N o Op 0 0 O co p V 0 D N t00 �= �`" m z N r OD N CO M N It W O LL a m 0 0 (D O O O O O m O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O� 0 0 0 0 D1 O O n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N V u' M O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N p O O N 0 0 0 0 00(n 000000 M V 00 N O O O O 00 O 0co�0 V t0 O 00 O O W F p Z r n 000000 OMi M M (D N c t0 m r W C D CD W O O M N mr N 0) N n O IL o OODD (D W O O O O O O O O O m O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 m O O o 000 O O O O o0 O o O u7 O Ornv� 0 .- O O O O OOOO O O M ei p W F- CDgc o0o00vor- O (^00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vi M OD 0000000 coo O co O O fnU '- 0m n 0000 O n wo W mM�mm r N •7 m N 0 O e") ( N(D0 C6 c7i (6 L6 a cs �? m 0 co co n co Or n M N I- °o OD (mD V tD jZ Z V W O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o O O 00 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 O 0 O 0 (n W O 000 O O 0000 0 0 00000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O OO Q w� o 00000 0000 000 M m r_ O O O (t) O M O c (n u) 0 O 000 M M cc .f Q r N 0 m r t N G t` m W M N V W Q r M r C-4 N O W O as X w O O O O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 C. 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 9099 p W f' o o O O O O o O O O 0 O O O O o o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 00 O O O 0 0 0 0 O D O O O O O 0 o O O F W (' O O O O coo 0 0 0 0 000 M m r 0 0 0 V7 O co O O in N O O M M m O G N 01 �O m N �0 N 7 p 0 r N 0 m r 'T N C r- m 0 N M Ln co ka r M a '7 7 0 T � M N M N Q m F- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O O O O o 0 o 0 00 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o c c Z O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O c F w O o jW °0 m 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 o O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O c C Q F- O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0p pp O O C O O O O O O c U W w O 0 0 0 M cc r c O O (D O M c O u (n O M M m V O Naa_ O0poi1 m fD 1/N� IL 0 p O � � r N 0 m r [T N n m D) co N N r M 'Q d m O O M C N M C Q= am agw v w °x m F- (n— 01 CD z w°) z o� waJ°�p DaJ m U) a a(n < LU 0 to o Q LL b� 0 w > e w w V m a O z W ix Z o # N 0(nw O> F aD)(()wU) ww� (nw 0) (n °a� z y Zw wm# Y ��UFa- N t caw Qom -j L) o 00 y oLL a ?X0 ( Q =oowwwW z U) aww W w yFaoc�io azFZ Fa�w w F- m 0 F- a F..p 00�U) x omm(wiw�d �X w�0 w `n gw ga �vLLi(D w x ww�v~io�ZQ ° ML) LL w W C�ooc -wi- r- v�LL�a wx W ogzZ qz u = p w°o"zm� woo> w i }� ZZZ W OdZFi -W W m U)R: Q F F -> 0 O QU a 0 O a LL LL LL w F-W W W 00q W W F-W 0 V V aB Zw �N p 2 <02'U- V » >� W�ZUW twi f -F- W� W W W LU ZZZrjFZZ�mW�0 FW z(D0 � � S�(nma ~FO JaU) d�Fx -W Fx- �DD co F• m�Za W a W W W W zzz Om Oz0 W W W Uaa W ZZo0w�i?<nmoLLo F-mm O? LL1Z > U U w M M M O O O O O O) O o O r m 0 0 o O O O u) LO LO m O D) O O O a) O) O O O O O O M 0 0 0 0 N O (On DO) W p -� Q � (D M M D) 0) 0 D) V M M O M D) sr �{ M u') m O o N N V O (D r PO7 M c N n f� n O) OV M M M M M M M 7 V V V' (n u7 mm(DmmmmmmmmfD m(D '7 mm(Do a) m a> mm rn rn V W 1" W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m O O O N M u) O O V N N 0 0 0 0 0000 mF- 0�)GU-) n- 0in0(n(n0(n n n n n n n o0o O CA 01 m Q1 0) Of 0 Q Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m(D Dmmmmmmmmmm D(Dmmmm m m O) mCDC) CD CD a, mcn D) vw V r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r 111 1 IF O� 0� o� , O A ems. O ttl 4� O H O O N 0� � O 00 O O � N � v r O O N O O O N R io V y Fm �I 4 'S J 16J1 N CD O O CD Cl) O CD O T LO 00 W O d � cD > co O O o 0 0 0 0000000 W V- 00000coo CO N O N CD T O T M W O W D Z W W V) > J co QQW¢ H <C� Owww F- F- w U W `t W w 2w �O -j U) O< W Z LU X >Qm¢�0U) DF- U) wo (n w �WF -F-OW(f) Z D U) U) LL > U) WGW W>-F - Q w Z w W w Q D 5 W Q W O U D Z Z U Z W C)W 000000• - oor-- NOOv Lu T N T M N M M O CO U T T T T C) Qi T T T CD CD 00 00 00 O M cM M CO �7' d' d' F" W 00 w w w O O O T T T T T T N O Z LO Lo LO LO 0 0 CD N N N N O M M U W C) CO (D (D (D T T N T T T T CA CA O! �I 4 'S J 16J1 F /EXPN FCN:CN EXPENSE FILE CONTROL . FND CC OBJ PROJ ACCOUNT TITLE 1 6JI TYPE 160 162518 60000C OOOOC OPERATING EXPENSE SUMMARY SU CURR YEAR LAST YEAR PRIOR YEAR PROD L APPROPRIATIONS 207,000.00- 134,200.00- 166,745.00- N/A PRIOR YEAR APP 3,246.46- 36,408.38- 0.00- N/A REQUISITIONS 0.00- 0.00- 0.00- N/A ENCUMBRANCES 51,833.34- 3,246.46- 36,408.38- N/A EXPENDITURES 57,343.96- 108,857.61- 124,356.42- N/A BALANCE 101,069.16- 58,504.31- 5,980.20- N/A FORECAST $$$.$$$.$$$.$$ - NOTATION $$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ CLOSE FUNCTION /ACTVTY $$$$ OLD ACCT NO CATEGORY$ F /EXPN FCN:CN EXPENSE FILE IN6j FND CC OBJ PROD ACCOUNT TITLE TYPE 160 16251E 70000C 66069 CAPITAL OUTLAY SUMMARY SU CURR YEAR LAST YEAR PRIOR YEAR PROD L APPROPRIATIONS 590,148.00- 1,232,200.00- 0.00- N/A PRIOR YEAR APP 797,761.30- 0.00- 0.00- N/A REQUISITIONS 0.00- 0.00- 0.00- N/A ENCUMBRANCES 2,050.00- 797,761.30- 0.00- N/A EXPENDITURES 1,212,902.17- 77,165.15- 0.00- N/A BALANCE 172,957.13- 357,273.55- 0.00- N/A FORECAST $$$,$$$.$$$.$$ - NOTATION $$$$$ $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ CLOSE FUNCTION /ACTVTY $$$$ OLD ACCT NO CATEGORY$ 16J1 STRUCTURAL KRIS JAIN & ASSOC., INC. BUILDINGS BRIDGES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING ENGINEERS REPAIRS INVESTIGATIONS 660 NINTH ST. N. • SUITE 36 NAPLES, FL 34102 • (941) 262 -4225 FAX 262 -4101 REPORTS INSPECTIONS FAILURE ANALYSIS Pam Lulich, ASLA August 21, 2001 Landscape Operations Manager Transportation Operations Dept. 2705 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Ref: Bayshore Bridge Beautification Proposal for Preliminary Engineering Services Dear Pam: Pursuant to our meeting with you and Bob Petersen on August 16, 2001, our understanding is as follows: The Transportation Department is interested in modifying the bridge improvement design documents prepared by Bother Land Design (closed office) and put them out for bids and construction. Since we were involved in structural services on the bridge for Botner (later discontinued), that we might be in a position to assist the County with answers to certain items such as bridge anchorage for Planters, Railings etc. (pre - purchased). In addition, the County is interested in a professional opinion on issues such as Pedestrian and Traffic Rails on the bridge complying with the Bridge Code. On an interim basis, until certain issues of modifications to documents prepared by Botner are cleared up, we shall be pleased to provide engineering services in connection with the above understanding on a Time and Expense basis not to exceed $2,500.00. This can be set up on the basis of our established fixed term professional engineering contract with Collier County. A separate proposal shall be submitted for the main engineering services connected with modifications to the bridge improvement documents for bids, bid assistance and construction administration. Please issue a Work Order and a Purchase Order at your earliest authorizing us to proceed with the outlined services. Should there be any questions, please let us know. Very truly yours, KRIS JAIN & ASSOC., INC. Kris K. Jain, P.E. cc: Bob Petersen wp511bayshorelletter 1 MEMBER: FES ASCE ACI PCI PTI Kris Jain & Assoc. Fax:941 -262 -4101 Aug 23 '01 �� P.01 1 STRUCTURAL KRIS JAIN & ASSOC., INC. BUILDINGS BRIDGES CONSULTING ENGINEERS 01 tc�+ �q ENVIRONMENTAL `' 1 23 �. FS�� REPAIRS 660 NINTH ST. N. • SUITE 35 NAPLES, FL 34102 (941) 282.42 a 288.4101 INVES11GATIONS REPOR'T'S INSPECTIONS FAILURE ANALYSIS FAX MEMO Date: August 23, 2001 To: Bob Petersen, Project Manager Collier Transportation Oper. Dept. Fax: 659 -5787' Pages: 1 From: Kris K. Jain, F.E. Xr- r' Subject: Bayshore Bridge Improvements Interim Service Contract The Interim Fee proposal of $2,500,00 indicated in our letter of August 21, 2001 does not include time for meetings or presentation in front of the MSTU Beautification committee. In case we need to be involved in meetings with MSTU or any other authority (as indicated by you yesterday) the time and expense NTE amount would need to be increased to $3,300.00 for the possible additional time that may be incurred. Should there be any questions, please let us know. wp511bayshoreWaxmemo 1 MEMBER: FES • ASCE ACI PCI PTI n Kris Jain & Assoc. Fax:941- 262 -4101 Aug 21 '01 1 01 STRUCTURAL KRIS .lAlN & ASSOC., INC. "tt {`�' � ti' BUILDINGS BRIDGES CONSULTING ENGINEERS ENVIRONMENTAL ' ' - i 1 g g: REPAIRS INVESTIGATIONS 9$4 NINTH ST. N. SUITE 3t3 NAPLES, FL W02 (90.1) 262 -4225 FAX 282 -4101 REPORTS INSPECTIONS FAILURE ANALYSIS FAX MEMO DATE: August 21, 2001 TO: Bob Petersen, Project Manager Collier County, Transportation Dept. Fax: 659 -5787 Pages: 2 FROM: Kris K. Jain, P.E. o% REF: Baysbore Bridge Improvements Past Unpaid Invoice by Bower As per our conversation of 8/16/01, we are submitting Invoice 9906 -3, dated July 21, 2000 for $480.00 which was never paid by Botner Land Design Inc, We would appreciate payment on services rendered. Should there be any questions, please give me a call. Thanks. Encl: wp5 llbotner1082101 fm MEMBER: F6S • ASCE ACI PCI PTI Kris Jain & Rssuc STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS BRIDGES ENVIRONMENTAL REPAIRS INvESTIGATIONS REPORTS INSPECTIONS FAILURE ANALYSIS Fax:941 -262 -4101 Rug 21 °01163wI P.02 KRIS JAIN & A5SOC., INC- CONSULTING ENGINEERS 990 NINTH ST. N. - SUITE 36 • NAPLES, FL 34102 • (941) 262 -4225 FAX 262.4101 INVOICE 9906-3 Bower Land Design, Inc. 3uly 21, 2000 3050 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Ref: Bayshore Drive, Landscaping Structural Engineering Services (KJA X19906) PROFESSIONA SERVICES RENDERED AMOUNT • BID PHASE Attend Pre -bid meeting & Structural Addendums 4 hours a $120inr. 1480. 00 Total this invoice $ 480.00 D: ws \invoice \bother MEMBER: FES ASCE AGI PGI DTI - 22, -01 04:03P Neubert Const Svcs Inc 941 33 O369-T P 0 t NFuarRT CON9TRUCTt0N tt EERVICES INC. Four W4mRs Ft�CRlbw 3390&t,"2 A I 1 {1'� 22 4: 25 CGC- 055911 941- 332 - 8800 FAX 332 -1991 August 22, 2001, Mr. Robert L. Peterson Landscape Operations Section Collier County 2705 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Bayshore Drive Beautification Project Dear Mr. Peterson; Attached for your review, are the estimated costs from Pavers, Inc. for repairs to the paving brick sections on the above referenced project. The price of $16,486.00 includes the repairs caused by other subcontractors, adjacent property owners, median repairs, and what could be classified as maintenance repairs. Additionally, the cost to fix the curbs south of the Mobil Station would be $1500.00. We apologize for the time in getting this estimate to you. Please review and call with any questions. Sincerely, t. Robert 4Weubert Vice President Aug -22 -01 !04:03P Neubevt Const Svcs Inc 941 33 Aug -13 -01 03:12P PavQrs InCW 941 992 Pavers., Inc. Interlocking Paver Installations Bonita Springs Pax 1941) 992 -1221' (941) 992 -7443 10955 L l.mnse Avenuc - Suite 11 2 - Bonita Springs, Fi, 34135 Cvr►tnwrcial -- Readential Driveways — Pool Decks — Patios Fully Licensed do Insured ;-()l1)'1't):0AV --N —ER 1F111 #,3)F.l: — . - .. N Ott:_ Mr. Bob Neubert Neubert Cvrmftuction CO- PHt)Nl: 332 -8800 Bay_wwre Drive Nacpkm FL I BLOC:1 Pavers, inc. PROPOS=fi TO PERFORM THE FOi_.LOWING: Repairs to paver Installation an both sides of 8ayshom Drive, Naples, to include rradtan from corrinwicar point adjacent to Eaves/ Trail m Station 181 an south side and Station 180 on the north side. Medians to station 180 to be included. Price does not include trv*tence of traffic. IdL4 ig4man A bnakdowtn of damaps to Individual lots Includes: South Side of Bays ivre thrive: At station 207.5, Irrigation pipes caused collapse of pavers. 1.715.00 At station 208, property owner driving flit dump trucks over sidewalk causing pavers to be aurtksn In two bag grooves. 2.175.00 Median at station 181 has had vehicular traffic nmu*V over it. Needs pavers removed and compac" with iimerock irtaoducaed to give better sub -bless actability. 2.600.00 Replaaa pavers at station 198.!50. Edge pavers sunk due to washout. Check for leaking pipe hem or problem will continua. 613.00 At sht-ron 182, replaos pavers wtrere pole was removed. 60.00 P.02 P.01 PAVERS SUPPLIED BY: All borders to be secured by w rr regiiircrl. 1. i )WNlik:'ll' 11l .C11 ?K is : ;:pOnsible fur rile lbllowir.l,: Any demolition work to be quote separately. A . `Co inspc :t nawri ils io- proper color avd sl• apc prior to instailation. B. All unde•grouod mili.ics, sprinkler pipes, electrical sleeving, etc. i Suh -ha-;L roust be 7" vlow finished grade for driveways, ail other 3" below finished grade. D. Wartr and deWi6iy ;tvail,-thic on jub site. _ . 1 inal invoit ing to bt ?dlw ted by field measurruren plus 10% for cuts and waste. 4tny addltrt''l ?.l worli ciu s lit of the conaract to be cl argnd at a labor rate of thirty -five dollars per man hour. "L 11), atiditirnt'111-ucoif tx ork al Corry dollars per how. `. !•.try !:haogc s in Iayc1!.. 1 ich require oddiriov it ma crials, will he on a separnte contract and in- talked after miginl contract flax beer compla�d.lnioat. `ALES PERSON. _ � � .��r �_} ACCEPTED BY. DATE: t:'t.ati "1 t)A11ilt i alxf3J t P.N►)5 I 1 �.(1CiRLl:�1Firr ANL) TERMS O# "f1lIS CONTRACT F.XPt.fLI1�F.n t)N'I'I IF. RACK till) F. For 'tl re finest installation of Interlockinz Pavers Aug - 22-01 04:03P Neubert Const Svcs Inc 941 33 %1,P P.03 r Aug -20 -01 02:24P PavQs Incw 941 992 P.01 Pavers, Inc. Interlocking Paver Installations Bonita Springs Fax (911) 991 -1221 (941)992-7443 10955 Fnw Anse Avenuc - Suite 9 2 - Bonita Springs, FL 34133 Cornrr+ercial -- Residential Driveways — Paul Dec1s — Patios Fully Licensed A Purred �nt..t� Ttf: OwNEWBIJII.UER JOB PHONE; DATE: P02 2 of 2 81201'01 n,�ylE: Mr. slob NeubaK JOB NAMir: Neubert Construction Co. _ S Pavers Repeft JOB ADDRESS: _ 111LUNC AD )RESS: Bayelone Drive ._ —SLIP CODE CITY: ZIP CO Naples, Ft. LOT #: K #: Fax: 332 -1991 Fevers, Inc. PROPOSZS TO PERFORM THE FOLLOWING: North Side of 8ayahore Orfve: At station 190, Wt poets up to curb top level. Then have, waken due, to IIIBileC cumv across comets 200.00 At sts om 190. norttt side of Shonwiew Drive, re&W border powers due to tragic damage and in dail pav em where pole removed 280.00 Station 202, take up, compact sub-ben and reinstall powers due to traffic damage, replace broken concrete edge. 512.00 StM m 208, neaiign pavers due to ttslffic cutting comer of Becca Avenue 180.00 Station 215, refit pavers around W poet base 112.00 Station 218, mudsat pavers at curb dowr »lope for extra strength and security 340.00 Station 248, 80' wr*w pavers due to irriptiian pipe, remove pavers, recomped rand bad, relay pavers, replacing broken pavers as necessary 1,800.00 Station 208, Approx. 30' diagonal slrtB kv due to electric conduit being installed at this locatit 2.730.00 PAVERS SUPPLIED BY: All borders to be secure! y mcrclo� ing w terc requircd7 1. t: WNLIt/l'3'Al.D R k *a }ponsible for the rollowirl;: Any demolition work to be quoted separately. A. 'lo inspe•:t materials Cur proper color and shape prior to installation. U. AB undt:'ground «tilides, sprinkler pipes, electrical sleeving, etc. C. Sub -bass MUST be 71' below nnished grade for driveways, all others 3" below finished grade. 0. %rer and electricity available on job sits_ Final invoit ing to be adjusted by field measuretneir plus 10% for cuts and waste. Any ath)44 pal worl; eutsidc of the uoatntct to be charged at a labor rate of thirty -five dollars r.w man hour. 4 . Any addit it mil tractor u ork at forty dollars per hon Any Chang, s in layout vAtich require additional ma"ea'ials, will be on a separate contract and installed after origial contract has been tutttplete(f. Utitinl. _ SALES PERSON; _ � .wl _ ACCEPTED BY: DATE: _ ._ "t1Sl�UMI: t Ut to "!'A,NUS Tl (iRks1:ML'Nf AND TLPMS OF THIS CONTRACT EXPLAINED ON THL' BACK SIM. Kris Jain & Assoc. Fax :941- 262 -4101 KRIS JAIN & ASSOC . , INC. 660 Ninth St. N,, Suite #36 Naples, FL 34102 Ph: (941) 262 -4225 Fax: (941) 262 -4101 TO: - [34S COMPANY: FAX NO. FROM: SUBJECT: F. (0 4 ,11-- s� Sep 4 '01 9 :37 P. 01 16J1 TRANSMITTAL kit DATE:_ n .r d(\� a NO. OF PAGES (Including the cover sheet): + 2 MESSAGE: E- L �- 6 G.Lk �--\s. 01 Cc. �ftm Note: If not received satisfactorily, please call (941) 262 -4225 Kris Jain & Assoc STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS BRIDGES ENVIRONMENTAL REPAIRS INVESTIGATIONS REPORTS INSPECTIONS, FAILURE ANALYSIS Fax :941- 262 -4101 Sep 4 '01 9 :38 P.02 1 16J1 KFOS JAIN & ASSOC., INC. CONSULTING iNGINEERS 660 NINTH ST. N. • SUITE 36 • NAPLES. FL 34102 • (941) 262 -4225 FAX 262 -4101 Mr. Robert L. Petersen Project Manager Transportation Operations Dept. 2705 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Ref: Bayshore Bridge Bridge Railings - Dear Mr. Petersen: LETTER REPORT Report September 4, 2001 As requested by you, following I report gives an evaluation and a professional opinion on the pre - purchased pedestrian railing syst m, and vehicular safety issues an the Bayshore Bridge across the Haldeman Creek. We understand that the original pi Botner ASLA) has closed his of] County and MSTU are interested reflect deleting the bridge decll construction. Our office was invl Design when the Gazebos were b Gazebos were postponed and the • Summary, Evaluation The purchased pedestrian the original Architect, do corrections and retrofit. For vehicular traffic six (vehicle traffic) back on walk is recommended. Appendix I gives detail Drawings and specificatio Code and inspection of th Applicable Code The bridge structure and governed by FDOT whit] Code. MEMBER: FES .ne professional involved on the project (Landscape Architect, George :e and all relevant documents may not be available for review. The n proceeding with the modifications to the construction documents to extensions for the 4 end Gazebos and advertising for bids and ved originally as a structural engineering consultant for Botner Land ng included, but services were discontinued in August 2000 when the ailing system was put out for bids and procurement. the following: ling system (metal railings, posts and planters), though approved by not comply with certain Code aspects and will require some field in absence of the current edge barrier, to contain and redirect it bridge, a 27" high concrete barrier on inside edge of the raised side of the relevant information on the original Design Professional, is, Fabricators involved, Shop Drawings furnished, Applicable Bridge stored railing system etc. the associated railing system for vehicular and pedestrian traffic are ( in turn refers to Federal AASHTO Bridge Design specifications as a ASCE ACI PCI PTI Kris Jain & Assoc. EVALUATION REPORT Pedestrian Railing Fax :941 -262 -4101 Our investigation indicates utilized to pre - purchase the railing system along the br the bridge edges. The prol boxes G 30' o.c., with 8 "'. high painted aluminum rai been pre - purchased by the undertaken. Railing Anchorages The metal handrail panels Spencer S.D's but omitte+ concrete planters and cony be anchored to the bridge and epoxied holes. The pl deck with s.s. concrete a design compliance is pr professional. Railing Mon Code Fxcessive space b (Retrofit required Questionable stn design loads in ab Engineer. Engini engineering and G Omitted 4" high Sep 4 '01 9:39 P.03 16J1 hat Landscape Architectural drawing B -1, dated August 17, 2001 was railing system. The plans indicate a raised side walk with a pedestrian dge side edges after demolition of the existing concrete traffic rail at used pedestrian railing system comprises of precast concrete planter 8" precast concrete posts 0 5' o.c in between the planters and a 42" ing panels in between the posts and planters. The railing system has County and stored offshe for use when the bridge improvements are ave been fabricated to be bolted into cast threaded inserts (shown on from delivered precast posts and planters) on the side faces of the etc posts with painted machine bolts and washers. The posts are to leek by the projecting threaded rods from post bases set into drilled iters have cast projecting steel base plates for anchoring them to the ;hors. Details of anchoring the railing system and certification for umed shown on shop drawings approved by the prime design Den curved railings at each end at bottom. b" max space permitted. compliance) ral strength of precast Posts and Planters for the Code specified :e of reinforcing steel shop drawings and design certification by an certification required by plans but not enforced. (Additional g for compliance will be necessary) aired toe plate or toe guard. (Retrofit may be necessary) Railing Problems • Failure to accoumt for sloped & curved bridge deck. Design plans show the railing on a flat bridge decks Bridge sides are sloped @ 1.2% with a vertical curve. (Special care and field adjustrnents will be required in installation). • Omitted cast Imirts in precast for bolting the aluminum railing panels. (New painted, special longer bolts set in pre - drilled & epoxied holes may be necessary) • Misfit of Railing system on the bridge, Precast Planters spaced at 30 ft o.c. instead of 31 ft o.c. of bridge pier beams to fit satisfactorily on the bridge. (Re- spacing of planters may be necessary for symmetry and satisfactory fit) Vehicular traffic Safety We feel it is .pertinent to - evaluate vehicular traffic safety in view of modifications to the bridge by removing the existing concrete traffic barrier wall at the bridge edge and replacing it with only Page -2- Kris Jain & Assoc., Inc. Kris Jain & Assoc. EVALUATION REPORT a pedestrian railing situations. Fax :941 -262 -4101 Sep 4 '01 9:39 P.04 16J1 particularly when an Owner's liability may be involved in accidental The Railing section of AASHTO Bridge design specifications, Section 13.4 requires that "Railings shall be provide along edges of the structure for protection of the traffic (vehicular) and pedestrians" for bo entities. On low speed highways such as the subject bridge, a combination barrier in con unction with a raised curb and sidewalks are indicated in the guideline (Fig 13.4 -1). The lower portion of the combination barrier, a concrete wall, is to take vehicle impact and re- direct traffli & back to the roadway. The current plans indicate raised curb and sidewalk (9" with the pavers) above the roadway and a Pedestrian type railing ystem at the bridge side edge replacing the original concrete traffic barrier. While the 9" hig sidewalk curb may contain the slow speed posted traffic of 35 mph, it is not likely to contain redirect accidental high speed vehicle (drunk driver or police chases) within the bridge by the it railing. Such an accidental speeding vehicle is likely to jump the curb and sidewalk and go over the bridge sides. Not an acceptable condition for traffic safety. Another possible option, ough not viable, is to install a traffic rail outside the new pedestrian railing system with plante s etc. This option is not feasible from the view point of traffic safety. Having metal railings, co to planters etc. infront of the traffic rail present projecting hazard to the out of control on-c ming vehicle, usually unacceptable for traffic safety. In addition, in the future, when the bridg deck is extended outward for the Gazebos, a traffic rail on the outside curve of the extension wil be unable to re- direct the accidental traffic. Redirection is usually with straight and flared sectior of a traffic rail. Traffic Rail Recon a tion: We recommend installing a concrete traffic rail (27" high. above roadway, acceptable for low speeds) along the inside edge of the sidewalk curb with extended ends toward the onco traffic and tapered down to curb height at start. Such a traffic rail will contain and redirect tr c as required by the bridge code. A good example are the concrete traffic rails separating th roadway and sidewalk on the Gordon River Bridge, where a similar traffic speed of 35 mph is posted, A pedestrian type of handrails are mounted on the outside edge of Gordon River bridge. The tire scuff marks on the concrete rail indicates that they are essential to contain and redirect ac-.idental traffic. We hope the above report is help 1 in assessing the railing system and the vehicular traffic safety. Should there be any questions, please let us know. cc: Pam Lulich Encl: Appendix I Very truly yours, KRIS JAIN & ASSOQ., INC, Kris K. Jain, P. E. wp511bayshorelletter2 Page -3- Kris Jain & Assoc., Inc. Kris Jain & Assoc. For: County Transportation Fax :941- 262 -4101 • Evaluation Method: Re County Transportation b • Original Prime Design R George Botner, ASLA Botner Land Design, Na) • Applicable Codes FDOT code for structure Traffic and Pedestrian ra • Relevant Railing Drawin Drawing B -1 dated Augi Notes included requiring Bridge Specs. • Pedestrian Railing Systei Broker: Al. Handrails: Precast Conc. Posts 1 and Planters: Shop Drawings Aluminum Handrails. S indicated on letter from Posts & Planter Base stamped drawing ind: during this report. Posts & Planter APPENDIX I Sep 4 '01 9 :40 P.05 16JI hore Bridge Improvements Railings - Evaluation Report of available design plans, shop drawings and documents with aent and on -site observation of purchased materials. . (Closed office) which refers to AASHTO Bridge Design Specifications, 1998 edition. ings are governed by Railings Section -13 in the Bridge Code. 17, 2001. sign compliance for Handrails, Posts, & Planters with the AASHTO Fabricators ►P Architectural Products. ntact: Elena Allison, Ph:(407) 645 -2854 mcer fabrications, Tavares, FL. ntact: Alex Ellis, Ph :(352) 343 -0014 .ra Art Stone Morrow, Ga. Contact: GAP Products. Fabrications Sheets 1-4 w Engineers stamp. Architect's approval (on tile). gage: Dura Art Stone 81/2 "x 11 " shop drawing. Required Engineers design compliance with Bridge Code may be in files. Not available Shop drawing not available for review. Iris Jain & Assoc., Inc. Kris Jain & Assoc. Fax:941- 262 -4101 Sep 4 '01 P.06 611 FIELD OBSERVATI1 (s /28/ol at Gulfshore Precast . Posts of Stored Railing System Cast inserts for bolting r dling panels omitted. Inserts required on railing shop drawings by Spencer fabricators. Post base rough with projecting threaded dowels. A bed of grout will be required for .plumbing ark, setting the post on bridge deck. Precast Planters Planters have cast galvan• d anchor plates with bolt holes on all sides for anchoring to bridge deck side walk. Sides ar recessed as shown on Spencer shop drawings to receive the metal railing panels. Cast thre inserts were omitted on the sides. Precast Planters appeared hollow with space for a planter a top. Painted fabricated panels 9tored outside on pallets exposed to the weather. Anchor holes in side plate slotted vertically t" for field adjustment during installation. Noticed some scratch marks. Fastening side .bolts 1/2" dia.x. 1" long painted machine bolts with painted washers shipped loose (in a cardboard box). Page -2- Kris Jain & Assoc., Inc. Kris Jain & Assoc. STRUCTURAL BUILDINGS BRIDGES ENVIRONMENTAL REPAIRS INVESTIGATIONS REPORTS INsPBCTIONS FAILURE ANALYSIS Fax:941 -262 -4101 Sep 4 '01 9:41 P.07 16J1 K IS JAIN & ASSOC., INC. CO SULTING ENGINEERS 660 [NTH ST. N. - SUITE 36 • NAPLESS, FL 34102 • (841) 268-4225 FAX 262 -4101 Robert L. Petersen Project Manager Transportation Operations Dept. 2705 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Bayshore Bridge l Background on S1 to George Botner Dear Mr. Petersen: As requested, to the best of our structural services provided to G discontinuation of our services in August 30, 2001 Services Botner Land Design :dge, following gives a general background information on the Botner by our firm (KJA) and what may have transpired after It 2000. • Dec. 2, 1999 Contract ith Botner Land Design to provide struct. engineering services for demo of c acrete rail, new traffic rail, anchorage for edge pedestrian rail system, median pl ters and deck extensions for 4 gazebos at bridge ends. • January, 2000 Meetings n re- location of 12" dia. WW main on west side of the bridge. • April -May, 2000 Meetings ith Collier County Transportation on Texas DOT traffic rail. • May 11, 2000 Signed & sealed structural plans (S1 -S4) for bids, showing deck extension for gazebos ind bridge anchorage of pedestrian H.R. system (planters, posts & aluminum rails). • May, 2000 Advertis for bids. (Bridge improv, included with Bay Shore Drive landscaping) • June, 2000 • July 10, 2000 • August, 2000 • August 11, 2000 • August 14, 2000 Attend pre-bid meeting and issue addendums. One bid r ceived on bridge improvements - Disqualified by County. Verbal R 7P from Botner to amend struct. design plans and specs deleting the 4 gazebos s ad proposal for construction phase services. Submitted proposal for amending plans & construction services to Botner. Discon ued structural services. (Disag ement on proposed fee) MEMBER: FES ASCE • ACI * PCI * PTI Kris Jain & Assoc Fax:941 -262 -4101 Events presumed occurred after • August 17, 2000 New include d specs. between Decision Sep 4 '01 9:42 P.08 16JI of structural services. tectural plans, B -1 by Botner showing bridge improvements and hand rail system (planters, posts & aluminum railing panels). Plans oign notes requiring compliance with AASHTO pedestrian rail design ote on earlier Arch drawing BP -1, requiring 6" maximum space dls not included on B -1. :) pre purchase items. • Sept. -Oct., 2000 Aluminu rail shop drawings by Spencer Fab Inc (available for review). Precast p anters, posts, coping stone shop drawings by Dura -Art Stone (not available or review). Letter al roval of shop drawings by Architect (10 /18100). (No co nts or written approval stamp on any available shop drawings) • November, 2000 Delivery of pre purchase items. a. A uminum handrail panels & hardware. b. R ecast planters, H.R. posts, planter, coping etc. C. L ght post and lighting. Items a d b stored at Gulfshore Marina's yard on Bayshore Drive. Should there be any questions, cc: Pam Lulich wp511bayshorelletter3 let us know. Very truly yours, KW JAIN & ASSOC., INC. Kris K. Jain, P.E. Page -2- 16JI STRUCTURAL KRIS JAIN & ASSOC., INC. BUILDINGS BRIDGES CONSULTING ENGINEERS uJ SE, _5 PM 2: 25 ENVIRONMENTAL REPAIRS INVESTIGATIONS 660 NINTH ST. N. SUITE 36 NAPLES, FL 34102 (941) 262 -4225 FAX 262 -4101 REPORTS INSPECTIONS FAILURE ANALYSIS Robert L. Petersen August 30, 2001 Project Manager Transportation Operations Dept. 2705 Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Bayshore Bridge Improvements Background on Structural Services to George Botner ASLA, Botner Land Design Dear Mr. Petersen: As requested, to the best of our knowledge, following gives a general background information on the structural services provided to George Botner by our firm (KJA) and what may have transpired after discontinuation of our services in August 2000. • Dec. 2, 1999 Contract with Botner Land Design to provide struct. engineering services for demo of concrete rail, new traffic rail, anchorage for edge pedestrian rail system, median planters and deck extensions for 4 gazebos at bridge ends. • January, 2000 Meetings on re- location of 12" dia. WW main on west side of the bridge. • April -May, 2000 Meetings with Collier County Transportation on Texas DOT traffic rail. • May 11, 2000 Signed & sealed structural plans (S1 -S4) for bids, showing deck extension for gazebos and bridge anchorage of pedestrian H.R. system (planters, posts & aluminum rails). • May, 2000 Advertised for bids. (Bridge improv. included with Bay Shore Drive landscaping) • June, 2000 Attend pre -bid meeting and issue addendums. • July 10, 2000 One bid received on bridge improvements - Disqualified by County. • August, 2000 Verbal RFP from Botner to amend struct. design plans and specs deleting the 4 gazebos and proposal for construction phase services. • August 11, 2000 Submitted proposal for amending plans & construction services to Botner. • August 14, 2000 Discontinued structural services. (Disagreement on proposed fee) MEMBER: FES ASCE ACI PCI PTI 16J1 Events presumed occurred after discontinuation of structural services. • August 17, 2000 New architectural plans, B -1 by Botner showing bridge improvements and pedestrian hand rail system (planters, posts & aluminum railing panels). Plans include design notes requiring compliance with AASHTO pedestrian rail design specs. Note on earlier Arch drawing BP -1, requiring 6" maximum space between rails not included on B -1. Decision to pre purchase items. • Sept. -Oct., 2000 Aluminum rail shop drawings by Spencer Fab Inc (available for review). Precast planters, posts, coping stone shop drawings by Dura -Art Stone (not available for review). Letter approval of shop drawings by Architect (10/18/00). (No comments or written approval stamp on any available shop drawings) • November, 2000 Delivery of pre purchase items. a. Aluminum handrail panels & hardware. b. Precast planters, H.R. posts, planter, coping etc. C. Light post and lighting. Items a and b stored at Gulfshore Marina's yard on Bayshore Drive. Should there be any questions, please let us know. cc: Pam Lulich wp51 \bayshore \letter3 Very truly yours, KRIS JAIN & ASSOC., INC. Kris K. Jain, P.E. Page -2- 08/14/2001 08:28 FAX QD02 16J1 August 13, 2001 Mr. Thomas �Iv'. 011iff George Botner ASLA 1474 The Pointe Dri-:e County manager West Palm Beach, F Collier County Government 334)9 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Fl 34112 Re: Your letter of August 7, 2001 Bayshore Beautifiction MSTU Final invoice Dear Mr, 0111 ff. Your letter in response to our request for final payment does not comport with th.- facts of our contract for services, the authorizing purchase order # 004425, or our services rendered completing these services referred to. Further, your statement that this work was closed out is in violation ofterminaticn requirements in our contract with Collier County. We were never advised of the : ounty's intention either verbally or in writing to terminate our agreement. Had you done =o, we would certainly have provided final invoicing prior to a legal termination date. The County owes us for the services provided as part of our lump sum agreement. We conducted 3 -days of inspections for this project after my departure from the area on February I5", 2001. Mr. Robert Petersen and Mr. Val Prince were in attendance at all of these inspections. and Ms Pam Lulich was in attendance at the last inspection. Lti fact, my taped field notes for all inspections carry the voices of these three persons. We do not wish to make further issue of this, since in the main, we have enjoyed a favorable relationship with Collier County over the years. However, in this case we have a contract with stipulated sum, far which services were rendered, and for w:zich the invoice must be paid. This is not an arbitrary matter. it is a matter of legal cont.r -.xt. if you should require further factual information can this subject please feel free t) call. Otherwise, we expect to be paid for contracted services rendered in the amount c f $573.50. Sincerely, George Botner SLA 08/14/2001 08:28 FAX George Botner ASIA 1474 The Pointe Drive West Palm Beach, Fi 31409 (561)515.8518 (561) 515.8543(FAx) 107!1 GEORGE BOTN ASL.A land5.cape arch t To: ib1 L�,,,, N aesj— l:rorn: George Botner iFax: C4A 4 Pages: Z Phone: Dole: gj is}-`C Re: Ai4iL" CC_ all', "rgent O For Review O Please, Continent ❑ Please Reply Q Pleas* l ecyele e Con wnentst Select this text and delete it or replace it with your own. To save Chang 3s to this template for future use, choose Save As from the File menu. to the Save As Type bo: :, choose Document Template, Next time you want to use it, choose New from the File menu, and then double - dick your template. 1b 01 16J1 WA COLLIER COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE August 7, 2001 George Botner, ASLA 1474 The Pointe Drive West Palm Beach FL 33409 Re: Your letter of July 19, 2001 Bayshore Beautification MSTU Final Invoice Dear Mr. Botner: 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774 -8383 FAX (941) 774 -4010 Thank you for your letter as referenced above. In your letter you requested payment of the "Final Invoice" for the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Project in the amount of $673.50. 1 have reviewed your request with the Landscape Operations Section staff and unfortunately find no basis for payment of same. The Purchase Order for this work was closed out on June 18. If you performed services after that date, you did so at your own risk. Since you did not correspond with or contact Mr. Petersen prior to your alleged inspections, we have no way of knowing exactly what services were performed. You have not provided any backup for your claim of payment. In summary, Collier County completed the Phase I Bayshore Beautification Project subsequent to your departure from the area in February. You were paid for those work items that were part of your contract up to the point at which the Purchase Order was closed. We do not believe you are entitled to additional payments. We wish you success in your new endeavors and best of luck on Florida's East Coast. Sincerely, Thomas W. 011iff County Manager CC: The Honorable Donna Fiala, Commissioner, District 1 Norman E. Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator / Bill Neal, Chairman, Bayshore Beautification MSTU Edward J. Kant, P.E., Transportation Operations Director Pam Lulich, ASLA, Landscape Operations Manager Bob Petersen, Landscape Operations MSTU Liaison Lyn Wood, CPM, Purchasing Department File: Bayshore MSTU July 30, 2001 George Botner, ASLA 1474 The Pointe Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Re: Your letter of July 19, 2001 Bayshore Beautification MSTU Final Invoice Dear Mr. Botner: Thank you for your letter as referenced above. In your letter you Invoice" for the Bayshore Beautification MSTU Project in the ai reviewed your request with the Landscape Operations Section st payment of same. 16J1 I V �v� "Final for The Purchase Order for this work was closed out on J 18. you ormed servi s a at date, you did so at your risk. Since you did not correspon with r c nt ct Mr. Peterse p ' r to your alleged inspections, we have no way of knowing exac y w es were per ed. You have not provided any backup for your claim payment,; - W- ktter. I \ In summary, Collier County completed the P e I your departure from the area in February. Yo your contract up to the pom which the Pur as entitled to additional pa ent s-ai Very truly yours, W. ►ore Be utifibpdbn Project subsequent to for thosl w items that were part of vas c ed. We do not believe you are f cc: a Ho le Donna Fiala, Commissioner, District 1 N Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator Bil , Chairman, Bayshore Beautification MSTU Ed d J. Kant, P.E., Transportation Operations Director Lulich, ASLA, Landscape Operations Manager Bob Petersen, Landscape Operations MSTU Liaison Lyn Wood, C.P.M., Purchasing Department File: Bayshore MSTU To: From: Date: 16J1 Memorandum Thomas W. 011iff County Manager Edward J. Kant, P.E Transportation Oper ' s Director July 30, 2001 JUL 2 0001 Subject: Requested Response to Botner Letter Dated July 19, 2001 Bayshore MSTU Beautification Project Attached is a draft response to the subject letter as you requested. Your original request was sent to Bob Petersen, but Bob asked me to review it before sending it along to you. I know you are intimately familiar with Mr. Botner and his performance on the Bayshore Beautification Project so I will not bore you with the details. There were several statements in Mr. Botner's letter to which staff takes strong exception. Chief among our concerns is Mr. Botner's allegation of unprofessional conduct. Mr. Botner repeatedly ignored our concerns and repeatedly went over or around the chain of responsibility set up by your office for this project. For example, we have spent a considerable amount of time and effort fixing sight line problems in response to residents' complaints and motorists inquiries. We have also had to bring contractors back to the site to convect or re- install items that were never installed correctly. We have yet to receive any corroboration of the time and expenses Mr. Botner alleges that he spent on behalf of the project and for which he sent the July 5, 2001 invoice. Specifically, the invoice requests payment for "Post- construction Warranty Inspections" as the major cost item. To date we have no work product, in the form of a report, letter or even a verbal update as to his findings and recommendations. He left town in February so quickly that we had to step in to assure that the contractors received their final payments to avoid potentially costly and negative legal proceedings. In summary, we maintain our position that Mr. Botner is not entitled to any additional payment for this project. cc: The Honorable Donna Fiala, Commissioner, District 1 Lyn Wood, C.P.M. Purchasing Department Bill Neal, Chairman, Bayshore MSTU Bob Petersen, Landscape Operations Liaison Pam Lulich, ASLA, Landscape Operations Manager File: Bayshore MSTU Transportation Operations Department ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL 6J 1 Rata AGENDA Carter October 3, 2001 Henning 9:00 A.M. Cc's �---- (Back half of) Commission Boardroom W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F ") — Third Floor I. Roll Call II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of September 5, 2001 Meeting Minutes IV. Land Use Petitions V. Old Business A. Wetlands Policy discussion VI. New Business A. LDC amendments VII. Growth Management Update A. Proposed Amendments I. Buffers H. Minimum clearing allowance III. Density blending VIII. Subcommittee Report Misc. Corres: A. Growth Management Subcommittee pate: 41-L� B. Rural Fringe Advisory Committee Liaison IX. Council Member Comments item# X. Public Comments Codes To: XI. Adjournment Council Members: Please notify the Current Planning Secretary no later than 5:00 p.m. on September 28, 2001 if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on a particular petition (659 - 5741). General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Sep 21 01 03:113p Fiala -V/ P. l carom Henning Mac'Kie NOTICE OF MEETING & AGE Ot a COLLIER COUNTY HISPANIC AFFAIRS ADVISORY BOARD THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2001 7:00 P.M. County Commission Meeting Room Turner Building (Building F), Third Floor Collier County ('government Center, Naples, Florida NOTICES ** Public comments will be limited to 5 minutes unless permission for additional time is granted by the Chairman. Collier County Ordinance No. 99 -22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 1, * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AGENDA 7:00 P.M: Meeting called to order and determination of quorum. Il. Welcome new members to the Board II1. Approval of minutes of the July 26, 2001 meeting. IV. Approval of minutes of the August 23, 2001 meeting. V. Determination of excusal of absences from the meetings. V1. Discussions: Update from Chairman Correa regarding farm worker issues. VII. Old Business: VIII. New Business Discussion by David Correa about banks charging employee /laborers who receive salary by check a $3.00 fee for cashing the check in the issuing bank when the employee /laborer has no account with the bank.' 1X. Public Comments. ** X Meeting adjourns. M,isc. Corres: Me* �Cl� item# 1 tj l Copies To: EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL (EMSAC) Fiala Cartel- """ AGENDA Henning MeeKle -- Colette September 26, 2001 * * * * *PLEASE NOTE — MEETING TO BE HELD AT THE MARCO MARRIOTT HOTEL TAMPA ROOM AT 2: 00 P.M. * * * * * CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES OLD BUSINESS ➢ By Laws ➢ Inter -local Agreements ➢ District #3 Replacements NEW BUSINESS ➢ Consent Agenda Item for Ambulance Fee increase ➢ Other Consent Agenda Items Misc. Corres: Date: Item# I l03 Copies To: V/ EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL MINUTES August 29, 2001 COUNCIL: Fay Biles, Chairman — District 1— Commission District — Present Bob Laird, District 1 — At Large — Present Heather Rockcastle — District 1— At Large — Absent Tuckey Ramsey — District 2 — Commission District — Present Vacant — District 3 — Commission District Dr. Michael Geraghty — District 4 — Commission District — Absent Kathryn M. Godfrey — District 5 — Commission District — Present Gail Dolan — Naples Community Hospital — Absent Dr. Mohl — Cleveland Hospital Representative — Present Gary Young — Collier County Sheriff s Office — Present Sheldon Reed — City of Naples — Present Stephanie Vick — Health Department — Present Fay Biles, Chairman called the meeting of the Collier County EMSAC committee to order at 2:00 pm. There were no minutes to be approved from the July meeting. There were not enough members present for a quorum. New Business: Ambulance Accident: Director Page gave a report on the ambulance accident. The crew was bringing in a patient with high blood sugar from Immokalee. The roads were wet. The driver lost control of the vehicle it ran off the road and overturned in a wooded area. Risk Management Department is conducting an investigation. One medic has returned to duty, one medic is still off due to injuries. At this time there has not been a lawsuit filed. Inter -local Agreements: The City of Marco, East Naples, and the Collier County Board of Commissioners have signed the Inter -local Agreements. EMS is working with Marco to get training completed. The City of Marco ALS engine has an approximate start up date of September. Chief Murphy stated there was a very positive relationship working with Jeff and the EMS staff. I think we are in the right direction. The Fire Chiefs at their last meeting agreed they are looking forward to utilizing their personnel on the street. East Naples will probably be ready in October. District #3 Replacement Two candidates have sent in applications for the vacant position, they are Robert Potteiger and Carolyn Spatta. A discussion was held on the two candidates. Bob Laird recommended Robert Potteiger and Tuckey Ramsey recommended Carolyn Spatta. Dr. Moll suggested they be invited to the next EMSAC meeting. Tuckey Ramsey made a motion to have both candidates come to the next meeting before voting on either candidate. Kathryn Godfrey second the motion. By -Laws Chairman Biles went over the changes the Board requested to me made. The corrections will be made and presented at the next meeting for approval before they are sent to the County Attorney for legal sufficiency. OLD BUSINESS EMS 200i Anniversary Picnic The picnic was held at Sudgen Park. There were 125 tickets sold. Everyone had a great time there was plenty of food and everyone had a good time. Chief Murray made the suggestion that the next meeting September 26 be held on Marco Island. That meeting will be held at the Marco Marriott in the Tampa Room, 400 South Collier Boulevard. Meeting Adjourned 3:10 p.m. AuBu'st l; 200T TRANSCRIPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Naples, Florida, August 7, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Environmental Advisory Council, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Thomas W. Sansbury COUNCIL MEMBERS: Chester Soling ABSENT: Alexandra Santoro Michael Coe Ed Carlson Erica Lynne William Hill Larry Stone Alfred Gal ALSO PRESENT: Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney Stan Chrzanowski, Development Services Barbara Burgeson, Senior Environmental Specialist Stephen Lenberger, Planning Services Page 1 16J1 August 7, 2001 Ray Bellows, Planning Services Chahram Badamtchian, Planning Services William Lorenz, Natural Resources Page 2 Au6 stTIQL CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Barb, are you ready to go? Okay. Why don't we call the roll. MS. BURGESON: Sansbury. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Here. MS. BURGESON: Coe. MR. COE: Here. MS. BURGESON: Carlson. MR. CARLSON: Here. MS. BURGESON: Hill. MR. HILL: Here. MS. BURGESON: Santoro. MS. SANTORO: Here. MS. BURGESON: Larry Stone has an excused absence. Alfred Gal has an excused absence. Lynne. MS. LYNNE: Here. MS. BURGESON: Soling. MR. SOLING: Here. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: We have a quorum with seven of our nine members with us today. Okay. The agenda, does anyone have any additions, deletions, comments, or anything to the agenda? (No response.) MR. COE: I move we approve. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It's been moved and approved. Do I hear a second? MR. CARLSON: Second. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It's seconded. All in favor -- (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: There being no opposed, the agenda is approved as written. Page 3 16J1 August 7, Zooi How about the minutes from July 3? Any corrections, additions, deletions? MR. HILL: I move we accept them as written. MR. COE: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Moved by Mr. Hill and seconded by Mr. Coe. All in favor -- (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing no opposed, the minutes have been approved. Okay. Let's go home. Barbara or Steve. MR. LENBERGER: Good morning. For the record, Stephen Lenberger, development services. The petition before you is a special treatment permit, an ST permit, on Keewaydin Island for a single- family homesite. On the visualizer I have an aerial with the subject property shown on it. It's bordered in white. The property about a year ago was covered with quite a bit of Australian pine and Brazilian pepper, and the applicant received an exotic vegetation removal permit to remove the exotics from the property, which he did. So as you you can see, there's quite a bit of open sandy areas on the site. The petitioner would like to build a single - family home with a pavilion, generator building, and a tennis court. They also have a request in for a dock extension into the pass on the east side of the property. Since the petitioner is requesting to alter more than 10 percent of the site area, we cannot do administrative approval of the ST permit. It has to go forward to the EAC, the Planning Commission, as well as the Board of County Commissioners. Site alterations are not that much over the 10 percent site alteration. They're 13.3 percent. I'll put another aerial on the visualizer. What the applicant has done for us is indicated in white lines. It's roughly the area of the proposed site improvements. The Page 4 Au 1,44A single- family home is basically the area outlined on the lowest portion of the visualizer. The tennis court is off to the side, and smaller buildings are the pavilion and the generator building. The area where the structures are going has been disturbed as mentioned previously with the removal of exotics on the property. I'd like to put up another aerial. The aerials -- the two photographs in the center of the visualizer pretty much show the area cleared with scattered seagrapes and grass as well as some cabbage palm, younger cabbage palm. There are no protected species on site although there are gopher tortoises on the island. They may eventually colonize the area. The petitioner will be doing some revegetation on the site as stated in the staff report to make up for the difference in area altered over 10 percent allowed by administrative approval. The petitioner is here if you have any questions specific to his proposal. I'm here to answer any questions. That concludes my presentation. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. Hill. MR. HILL: We did not receive a staff report with the -- at least I didn't. Did anybody else? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: No. MS. LYNNE: I didn't either. MR. HILL: Are you saying that the real petition is based on 13.3 percent as opposed to 10 that's the criteria? MR. LENBERGER: Yeah. The site alteration is 13.3 percent. It should be on the site plan. Hopefully you'll be able to read it. You'll have to excuse me. When I did the staff report, it was right before I went on vacation, so I was not here for the mailing. Apparently some of the members did not receive some of the staff reports for some of the projects on public petitions. -I can pass around my staff report. You can take a look at it. There's also an original that should be attached to here somewhere. Page 5 16J1 August 7, 2001 MR. COE: I've got two questions. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Mr. Coe. MR. COE: Two questions. I notice there's -- it looks like Marco Boulevard. Is this a proposed road down the middle of the island? MR. LENBERGER: Yeah. That's the platted easement down the length of Keewaydin Island. Obviously, there's no bridge to Keewaydin Island, so it will not be built. MR. COE: So what is that going to be? Is that for golf carts or something? MR. LENBERGER: Well, it was historically for a road. I guess maybe Stan can answer a little bit more of the history on that. He probably is more familiar with, than I am, the area. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: Not Keewaydin. MR. LENBERGER: But it was an easement that was platted on Keewaydin Island historically. Obviously, there's no bridge to Keewaydin Island, so it probably will not be built in the future. MR. CARLSON: My understanding -- my historical perspective is that that was the issue, building the road to Marco Island. Rather than its present alignment, building it through Keewaydin. The community rallied against it. They started The Conservancy of Southwest Florida and the establishment of Rookery Bay. It was the issue over this road, if this is the same road. Yeah, that's it. MR. SOLING: Question. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. SOLING: If this is an easement, how do you build on it or under it because there's the potential of somebody in the future exercising the easement? MR. LENBERGER: That's a good question. The petitioner has located the structures outside the easement. Page 6 August Y, 200f MR. SOLING: Well, you have a septic -- MR. LENBERGER: But he does have a septic area, that's correct. MR. SOLING: And the back of the house is right on the easement. It looks or appears to be right on the easement line. There's no setback. Some day somebody 50 years from now builds a bridge or makes that road, which is a perpetual government easement, then the house is going to have to be -- it's right on the line of the road with no setback. MR. LENBERGER: I honestly don't know if it's a government easement. I think it's just a private easement. MR. SOLING: Well, whoever's easement. MR. LENBERGER: It would be the developer's risk to put a structure in there, yes. MR. SOLING: Second question: Just out of curiosity, how will the McVeys get to this -- McVickers get to this house? Are they going to build a dock or something? MR. LENBERGER: Yes. They currently are in for a petition for a boat dock extension so, yes, they'll get there by boat and have a dock. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Do we have any questions for the petitioner? Yes, ma'am. MS. LYNNE: Under what circumstances are exemptions usually made? Is it like with zoning where there has to be a special quality? What are the guidelines for issuing exemptions over the 10 percent? MR. LENBERGER: For single family, that is the exemption, 10 percent site alteration. The only other exemption for single family is in the area of critical state concern. You're allowed a minimum of 2,500 square feet of alteration for your very small lots such as in Copeland or Plantation Island. But it's spelled out in the code. That's Page 7 AugusPq,.4r the only exemption for single family. MS. LYNNE: Is there supposed to be an extenuating circumstance why we should allow an extra 3 percent or 3 1/2 percent? I mean, I just don't know. MR. LENBERGER: This is the first petition that I know of that we've had over the 10 percent site alteration. Obviously the lots on Keewaydin are fairly large. The petitioner wishes to have a tennis court for his children, and that's why the petitioner has forwarded it to you. MR. HILL: What is the total acreage of the lot? MR. LENBERGER: Perhaps -- MR. McVICKER: It's about 2.4 acres. THE COURT REPORTER: Your name, sir. MR. McVICKER: Henry John McVicker. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. McVicker, come on up to the podium. MR. McVICKER: It's about 2.4 acres. That's my understanding of the calculation. It's about 96,000 square feet. The 10 percent would have been about 9,600 square feet. I think we're at about 13,000 feet with the tennis court. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: So 12,642. A question for either one of you. I go up there all the time. You'll notice as you look at the pictures that Mr. McVicker's property has had all the exotics removed, but then when you get down there, you've got one lot down here that has not had the exotics removed. Is that because of the permit requirements or somebody just hasn't done it? A lot of Keewaydin down there completely has all of the Australians gone. Did you do that yourself? MR. McVICKER: When we purchased the property, it had had some work done by a previous owner who apparently owned it for a year or two. There were still a significant amount of exotics on the AuguSf 0,. 200f property. So in talking to Mr. Lenberger, he recommended that prior to the issuance of a permit we would need to eventually deal with the exotic cleanup. So we took the opportunity to essentially get the site in order by removing the exotics. That way we could also understand the siting of the home and basically put together our plan. So we did that recently, about two months ago, and then took those photographs that you have in front of you to try and indicate, basically, the existing remaining natural vegetation, native vegetation, and also give you some good pictures of where the site elements would go on the property. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It looks to me, like, about half of your site coverage is that tennis court. MR. McVICKER: Yes. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It's essentially in an area -- it looks to me like there's nothing there but sand right now. MR. McVICKER: Unfortunately, they take up a lot more space than we appreciated, yeah. Tennis courts take up over 6,000 square feet. That's correct. In fact, they're normally 7,200 square feet. We reduced the size of it to 6,000 square feet. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Anything else? Yes, sir. MR. CARLSON: Well, my understanding is to get a certificate of occupancy on this house, it's county regulations that you have to take the exotics off the property anyway. MR. McVICKER: Yes, that's correct. MR. CARLSON: So that would happen no matter what. MR. McVICKER: That's correct. We just chose to do it at this time so that we could understand what would be left on the site and how we could essentially prepare the site plan to present to you and to the state for permitting. MR. CARLSON: So with the rule in place, the 10 percent rule in place, why would we approve or set a precedent to go above that Page 9 16J1 August 7, Zooi 10 percent for this project? MR. McVICKER: That's a good question. We thought that in the spirit of how we've understood the vegetation issues and natural resource issues to relate to the island, that what we would try and do is create a natural environment there, even though clearly we'd be disturbing 13.3 percent. We would revegetate a significant portion of the area at a 2 -to -1 ratio to try and essentially bring it back to a natural state, in fact, more natural vegetation than would be there after the removal of the exotics, so the site location for the tennis court and for the house essentially doesn't disturb the area any further than was required for the exotic removal; slightly in -some areas, but not much. It's 1 or 2 percent. That's what we tried to illustrate with the overhead, showing those things would be placed in areas that are essentially open spaces. But we would be very willing, and actually would like to do it anyway, to revegetate the area with native vegetation. We think it would just look nicer and be appropriate in this case. So if we were doing that, essentially, we would build it back up to an area of net disturbance to be significantly less than 10 percent. So in the spirit of conservation and compatibility, that was our thought. MR. CARLSON: Well, I think, you know, for me to approve the deviation from the rule, I would have to see some sort of plan about how this is an advantage to go to 13 percent, and I just don't have that. MR. McVICKER: Okay. I can try and take a shot at that. If we were to go to the 10 percent, we could do that, as I understand it, without needing to revegetate anything. We could go along with our plans and develop the site. If we go to 13 percent, we will actually revegetate 6 percent of the space. Six thousand feet is what we talked J a8ut, and I believe it's reflected in the staff report. So the net disturbance after revegetation would be 6 percent according to this Page 10 Au6u4t Y, 200T proposal as opposed to the 10 percent that we would be allowed under normal administrative procedures. In any case, we're very motivated owners to make this an extremely natural landscape, and we do recognize that you have guidelines, and we don't want to create a scenario where a precedent makes your life more difficult. We think in the spirit of what you're trying to do -- and we applaud it on the island and elsewhere -- we would embrace trying to make that a very natural environment. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Are we correct in this case that Mr. McVicker just told us that there is no requirement -- if he does the 10 percent coverage -- to do any replanting of native vegetation? What he's saying is he's going to do about 3,000 square feet greater coverage than allowed and for that 3,000 square feet he's going to revegetate 6,000 square feet. Is that what I'm reading here? MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: So it's a 2 -to -1 ratio. MR. LENBERG: Right. For the area over the 10 percent site alteration, that's correct, 2 to 1. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I think that's a pretty reasonable approach to it. MS. LYNNE: If this land and buildings are sold, can the next owner relandscape, in other words, put in exotics and change the whole character? MR. LENBERGER: Well, the code prohibits planting exotic vegetation, non - native species on undeveloped coastal barrier islands. MS. LYNNE: So there's no allowable planting of any non- native species on the island? MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. MS. LYNNE: Okay. I just wanted to verify that. MR. LENBERGER: The only exceptions that I am aware of is occasionally coconut palms are placed in because they're naturalized. Page 11 16J1 August 7, Zooi MS. LYNNE: Yeah. MR. HILL: Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. HILL: Two quick ones. Steve, is there any way if this is approved of making it a covenant attached to the deed that the revegetated area cannot be disrupted by subsequent owners? Can that be put into the approval? MR. LENBERGER: It will be stipulated in a resolution with the final -- MS. STUDENT: I don't think the deed is the proper place to put it. The county's resolutions and ordinances control, and they run with the land. Any property owners, when they are a perspective purchaser, are put on notice to exercise due diligence and ascertain what the restrictions are on the use of that land, not only private as well as public. MR. HILL: Would that be fairly binding to the new owner? MS. STUDENT: It should be. MR. HILL: The other question I have -- I see nothing in the report about the dock and nothing on the photographs. Is this a city dock requirement that needs to be satisfied? MR. LENBERGER: No. It's a county dock extension. It's not on the property. Technically it's off the property and into the water, so it's a separate petition. MR. HILL: Okay. So we're not to consider the dock itself? MR. LENBERGER: Right. Because it's not orn the property or the area that -- MR. HILL: So that's not part of the 13.5 percent -- MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. MR. HILL: Okay. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. CARLSON: Just one last question. Since you've discussed Page 12 AuBUS[ l; 2901 this with staff, why don't we have a revegetation plan to look at? MR. McVICKER: We felt we would come before you to get a sense of the board's position on this, and we're certainly happy to develop that and represent or resubmit that to you. We're also open to suggestions from the board as to what revegetation. I had a brief conversation with Stephen. The island is new for us, and so the species are -- we're still learning about what species are appropriate. I know the coastal dune area has some sea oats and seagrapes up in there. We would continue to expand those and revegetate the area in consistency with those types of elements. Then as far as the balance of the property and where it would be revegetated and what would be used, we're very open to that. We do have some resources. There's several people who have worked on the island revegetating, and we would look to them to get some guidance. But we would be more than happy to submit a plan. MR. CARLSON: There's certainly lots of help out there in that department. Let me ask one more question. For 6,048 square feet, how many tennis courts do you get? MR. McVICKER: One. MR. CARLSON: Just one net? MR. McVICKER: Yeah. MR. CARLSON: One tennis court? MR. McVICKER: Yeah. MR. CARLSON: Wow. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It's 60 x 120. MR. McVICKER: It takes a lot of space. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Would you consider, Mr. Carlson, if we took No. 3 on the recommendations and added a sentence to No. 3 that would require the submission of a revegetation plan to -- if it's acceptable to staff -- prior to approval by the County Commission? Page 13 16J1 August 7, 2001 MR. COE: I'd go for that. That would solve the problem as far as I'm concerned. MR. HILL: A point of interest, Mr. Chairman, on the aerial. Is that line the mean -high water line? MR. McVICKER: It's very close to it. That's the vegetation line which -- I don't have the site plan in front of me, but the mean- high water line and the top of that dune are pretty close to each other, yeah. There's actually a pretty good elevation there. It's about six feet at the top of the dune there. It happens to be one of the higher pieces. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yes, ma'am. MS. LYNNE: From what I know about Keewaydin Island and the fact that it has been sold and houses will be put on it, I do like this approach, and I do like -- I do see a justification for granting more disturbance based on preserving the rest in a really natural -- not only vegetation, but what's going to fit in with the tortoises and the rest of the life there, and it seems that that might encourage other landowners to do similar -type things. The only thing I would like to see is something that's somehow more permanent and enforceable beyond your tenure there, and I don't know what those possibilities are. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I think Miss Student just told us that a resolution is binding on future landowners. Is that not correct? Is that what you told us? MS. STUDENT: Yes. Land -use regulations run with the land, and so any new person purchasing the land is subject to those regulations. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Subject to this resolution that would approve this? MS. STUDENT: Yes. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: So it is binding with the land, and Page 14 Augu3l�41 it would go to the next one. MR. SOLING: One -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. Go ahead. MR. SOLING: -- simple question. Where do you get water? What do you do with the sewage on this property? MR. McVICKER: You have to have a self - contained system, obviously, on the island. MR. SOLING: Can you drill and get water? MR. McVICKER: Apparently there is an aquifer that runs under the island. That would not be our plan. I know that there's one home that has done that. It's brackish water that needs to be treated. The typical process for water is a cistern system or rain collection off the roof, and that's what we would do, and you'd have solar panels. MR. SOLING: Is electric there too? MR. McVICKER: Solar panels. MR. SOLING: Oh. MR. McVICKER: You use a battery system, and then a septic field for the septic. Also, Mr. Soling, to your point on the right -of -way, I do have some knowledge that some of the owners in different parts of the island that also have that right -of -way on their property have had that vacated. MR. SOLING: Oh, yeah? MR. McVICKER: So pieces of it are missing. And I think also somebody mentioned The Conservancy has been motivated to try and block a development of that as well, so I don't know that that would ever be utilized. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. MR. COE: I'd like to make a motion. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. Coe. MR. COE: I'd like to make a motion, please, that we pass this Page 15 AugusFo, 40r particular project with the caveat that an appropriate revegetation plan be submitted to the staff, and if they approve it, then the project's good to go. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Do I hear a second? MR. HILL: Can we add to that motion a request for a resolution attached to the property that that vegetation be maintained? MR. LENBERGER: It will be stipulated in the resolution. ST permits are approved by resolution. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yes, sir. MR. CARLSON: Discussion on the motion. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Second on the motion by Mr. Carlson. Discussion. MR. CARLSON: I didn't second it. I'm discussing it. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Oh, you're discussing it. Mr. Hill seconded it. Okay. Now you can discuss it. MR. CARLSON: Yeah. I'm going to hang tough on this one because I don't like being in this position. If you come in for an exception to the rules, then you should have a plan in hand, and we should see what we're getting for the 3 percent above the rule that we're giving up. MR. McVICKER: I apologize for that. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. MR. McVICKER: We'll get that in order. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Any further discussion on the order? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. A motion is on the floor that we approve the staff report with the additional language that requires the petitioner to submit a detailed revegetation plan to staff that's acceptable to staff prior to the time that final approval of the resolution is submitted to the County Commission. Does that satisfy Page 16 AuBuAs 0, 4J you, Mr. Coe? MR. COE: That's correct. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. All in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. MR. COE: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Aye. MR. SOLING: Aye. MR. HILL: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed? MS. SANTORO: Aye. MR. CARLSON: Aye. MS. LYNNE: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: So it's 4 -3, thus we do not have a it does not pass from the standpoint of the requirements of the -- or how we're put together. We have to have five to pass it. So, basically, it will go forward to the Planning Commission with a report -- MS. BURGESON: Actually -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Excuse me. Go ahead. MS. BURGESON: At this point we usually recommend to the board to try to make another motion that can pass with a vote of five, if anybody is willing to try to make another motion. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Someone who voted for that would have to make that amendment. Mr. Coe? Mr. Hill? Anybody have any ideas? MR. COE: Three negatives. We ought to let the negatives figure out how they're going to get it passed. MS. LYNNE: I'd really like to see the petitioner come back with more information and more assurances for how it's going to happen. I think it is a good idea. I'd just like to have more work on it before we see it. Page 17 16J1 August 7, 2001 MR. McVICKERS: In terms of -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: If I could, please. You know, we just got the petitioner to agree to submit a detailed landscape plan to staff that would be approved by the staff. What additional information can the petitioner submit other than a detailed landscape plan? We've had the county attorney tell us that the resolution that's passed will run with the land so that anybody else that takes it has got to live by it. If we ask for additional information, we need to tell them what additional information we're asking for. MR. CARLSON: Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. CARLSON: All I'm asking is we not be in the position of approving things that we haven't seen. That's all I'm asking. So I would move that we move for denial of this petition'until petitioner can come forward with a detailed plan so we can see what he's proposing to compensate for the impacts above the 10 percent rule that's now in place with the county. MS. BURGESON: One option you might want to consider is to continue it rather than deny it. So you would continue it until next month's meeting and they can bring forward that. MR. CARLSON: I amend my motion to continue this until next month's meeting. MS. LYNNE: Is that what the petitioner would like? MR. McVICKER: Whatever you would like. We're happy to comply with the needs of the board. MS. LYNNE: I second the motion to continue. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: A motion has been made and seconded to continue this until next month. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: All in favor of the motion? (Unanimous response.) Page 18 Augus[ 0, JJ CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing none, it continues until next week -- next month. MR. McVICKER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. MS. BURGESON: Before we start this next petition, I just wanted to ask the EAC members -- we were not aware on a staff level that some of those staff petitions did not get -- that staff EAC reports didn't get out to you with these packages. Can you tell me if there are any other projects or petitions in front of you today that you don't have staff reports for, and I'll make copies of those right now and hand them out. MS. SANTORO: We have all the others. MS. BURGESON: Oh, you have all the others. This was the only one. Okay. In the future if anybody's missing one MR. COE: I don't have one. I don't have one for Silver Lakes and Walnut Lakes. MS. BURGESON: Okay. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: You don't? MR. COE: Nope. MS. BURGESON: Okay. I'll make copies of those. MR. COE: Now, remember, my mail gets forwarded if they haven't changed that address yet. MS. BURGESON: Okay. MR. COE: So that could be the reason. It may have been sent out separate and I just didn't get it. MS. BURGESON: Okay. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Did we send it up to Pontico (phonetic) or what? Page 19 1 Au o,,401 MR. COE: No. They've been sending it to Egypt. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Silver Lakes. Here we go. Okay. MR. BADAMCHIAN: Good morning, council members. My name is Chahram Badamtchian. I'm from planning services staff. This is a PUD amendment to the master plan of the PUD, only, for a Silver Lakes PUD which is located along 951, Collier Boulevard, almost two miles south of the 951 and U.S. 41 intersection. This PUD was approved with the master plan which -- with the large recreation tract at the top and smaller conservation tracts, and what they are proposing, basically, is to make most of the recreation tract at the top a conservation tract up to here, and they are changing these back to recreation. Let me give you a list of things that they are doing basically. They are increasing the acreage of conservation tract from 3 to 18. They are reducing the park/TTRV area from 26 acres to 24 acres. They are reducing the buffers from 5 to 3 acres and reducing the recreation areas from 97 acres to 86 acres, and they are reconfiguring some lots. As you can see in the older master plan, this street went all the way to the end, and there are lots on both -- on the south side. And in here, this street ends here, and they were proposing a lake and some golf course. Basically, that's the extent of changes, and I believe most of the changes are due to the permitting or environmental permitting through the state and federal agencies. Steve Lenberger, the environmentalist who reviewed this in detail, is here to answer all your questions. That's basically the extent of the changes. MR. LENBERGER: Good morning again. For the record, Stephen Lenberger, development services. The subject property -- I have an aerial on the wall here -- is pretty much developed on its southern two- thirds. It has an undevelopment portion roughly of about one -third of the property on the north end. Page 20 16J1 August 7, aooi Vegetation on the site is a mixture of pine flatwoods, hydric pine flatwoods to the east, and basically a kind of mixed wetland forest, wax myrtle cabbage palm, laurel oak to the west. The whole area was claimed as jurisdictional wetlands by the state and federal agencies. The property is located -- part of the property is located in the Deltona settlement. I have a map of the Deltona settlement on the wall. The areas in red indicate the developable portion within the Deltona settlement agreement. This property sits -- this red portion at the top and the yellow portion outside the Deltona settlement area here is this vegetative strip that you see in front of you which the EIS pertains to. The PUD master plan -- the original master plan identified this whole northern strip as a recreation area with a large lake and, I believe, also a maintenance facility as well as nature trails. There was also a preserve area, roughly, in this portion of the PUD and in this area two very small preserve areas. The petitioner has reconfigured the master plan and removed these two preserve areas. There are no preservation requirements on the southern two parts of the property since they are within the Deltona settlement area and also identified as developable area within the Deltona settlement area. So we're dealing with the north piece here. We're designating roughly -- or at least over three- quarters of it as preserve or conservation area. They'll have a commons recreation area in the front, and there will be some lots encroaching on the south end over here. Wetlands on site -- well, the whole northern portion is wetlands, 37.3 acres, and they'll be impacting 11.7 acres for the project. Preservation will be 25.9 acres of wetlands by the north end of the PUD. The petitioner is also proposing, in addition to on -site restoration Page 21 A�1620� U -- and there are quite a few exotics on the property -- the petitioner has removed quite a bit of melaleuca, an early vacation on this portion of the preserve. There were also some berms and agricultural ditches which will be removed, leveled off, as necessary. They're also doing off -site mitigation. At the time we processed the EIS, there was about 4.89 acres of off -site mitigation proposed or credits, I should say. MR. CARLSON: Could you repeat that? MR. LENBERGER: 4.89 mitigation credits are proposed or were proposed at the time I reviewed the EIS. I did a protected - species survey. There were no protected species observed on site. The petitioner is here as well as the environmental consultant to answer any questions you may have, and I, of course, will answer any questions. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. Carlson. MR. CARLSON: Have you been on the site? MR. LENBERGER: Yes, I have. MR. CARLSON: The condition of the wetlands hydrologically? I mean, I know there's exotics, but are they hydrologically intact or impacted? MR. LENBERGER: They look pretty good. There are a lot of exotics, mostly Brazilian pepper towards the west, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. The areas they removed the exotics look pretty good, so the habitat has pretty good quality. The laurel oaks and other woody vegetation towards the west are still fairly young. They're not very large trees. Towards the east property of the property the pines are fairly large. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. HILL: In the existing layout compared to the proposed, the internal lakes look like they're identical, the two lake areas inside your pink. Page 22 August MR. LENBERGER: Okay. MR. HILL: Apparently that large lake up in the original north portion is gone. MR. LENBERGER: That's correct. MR. HILL: Has that been cleared by water management to be acceptable with respect to water control on the site? You're losing a significant lake up there. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: It's not necessary for the water management. MR. HILL: Okay. They have passed on the removal of that lake? MR. CHRZANOWSKI: Uh -huh. MR. HILL: Okay. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, ma'am. MS. SANTORO: Steve, which way does the drainage flow in that area? Does it go south? MR. LENBERGER: I'll let Stan answer that question. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: Excuse me. I was listening -- MS. SANTORO: Which way does the drainage go from that area? Does it go south? MR. CHRZANOWSKI: Some of the drainage passes under -- yes, it goes south. Some of the drainage passes under 951. Stan Chrzanowski from development services. It passes under 951 to the other side of the road and flows south. There is some drainage out through the mangroves directly -- I guess it's to the west. As you drive down there, you see all the culverts under the road and drainage just going out into the mangroves both to the south and west. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Any other questions of staff? Would the petitioner like to address the subject? MR. NADEAU: Yes. Good morning, council members. For the record, my name is Dwight Nadeau, planning manager for RWA, Page 23 16J1 August 7, aooi Inc., representing Conquest Development USA, LC. Dr. Badamtchian and Mr. Lenberger have done a fine job explaining the project. I will again emphasize that the purpose behind the petition is merely to reflect the current development intent. They have platted and recorded eight phases in the project. The amenity for a golf course, which was originally proposed in this area on the old plan, had a strip of lots along its southern boundary. What the petitioner found was necessary was to have some additional room to make a playable nine -hole executive course. Therefore, they've opted to remove this tier of lots in here and move them up slightly above the Deltona settlement agreement line, thus the permitting process with the Army Corps of Engineers and the water management district. Really, with the changes in residential opportunities and RV opportunities, there's been a reduction of two acres of those lands for development and a net increase of two acres of open space, not to mention the increase of the conservation tract from 3 acres to 26 acres, not 18 as Dr. Badamtchian had said. I have members of -- the environmental consultant here as well the project engineer if you would like to ask any questions. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: The area, previously, that we're saying is preservation now was previously recreation? MR. NADEAU: This area on the north side of the Deltona settlement agreement was designated as commons recreation. Everything around the development, including the lakes, is all classified as commons recreation. So the commons recreation area in here was reduced such that it could be redesignated as conservation. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Questions for the petitioner? MR. HILL: Would nature trails be compatible with the conservation area? In other words, the original says you have nature trails in that upper northeast portion. Page 24 Augus MR. NADEAU: Passive recreation, yes, nature trails. MR. HILL: That doesn't destroy the conservation designation, does it? MR. NADEAU: The environmental consultants tell me that the district or Corps will not allow any -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Excuse me. MR. NADEAU: We're not requesting nature trails in the application to the district and Corps. MR. LENBERGER: It would be a compatible use in a preserve area as far as staff is concerned, yes. MR. HILL: That was my question. You're saying that this now becomes conservation where it was not conservation before. MR. NADEAU: That is correct. MR. HILL: But all you had in that area originally is nature trails. MR. NADEAU: Over on the left -hand side of the page for you, sir, you can see a -- you can see the lake. That would not be consistent with a conservation area. And then on the right side of the page right up in the corner, you'll see a dashed line that says "storage area." So there was development proposed in the commons recreation designation. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Further questions by the council? Hearing none, what's your pleasure? MR. COE: I'd like to make a motion to approve. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Motion by Mr. Coe to approve. Do I hear a second? MS. SANTORO: Second. MR. COE: A second from Ali. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Second from Ms. Santoro. Discussion? (No response.) Page 25 16J Au 2�. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing none, all those in favor of Mr. Coe's petition signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed, same sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Motion passes 7 -0. MR. NADEAU: Thank you, council members. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: You're welcome. Okay. Mr. Carlson has a request, Barbara. MR. CARLSON: That map and Mr. Lenberger's comments are the best explanation I have seen of where the Deltona line is and how all that played out. Could we please have a copy of that map for future reference? MS. BURGESON: We can mail that out to the EAC members. MR. CARLSON: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. MR. BELLOWS: For the record, my name is Ray Bellows. I'm a principal planner with planning services staff. Petitioner is proposing to rezone the subject 204 -acre site from agriculture and RSF -3 to a planned unit development to be known as Walnut Lakes. As you can see on the visualizer, it's located on the north side of Tamiami Trail approximately two miles east of Collier Boulevard. The proposed 240 -acre PUD is a mixed -use development consisting of multi- family and single - family residential, an assisted - living facility, golf course, and a neighborhood village center to serve the residents of the community. The project is designed around the golf course and lakes. As you can see on the master plan, the lakes are intermittent throughout the middle, and the golf course comes around the side. The preserve area is along the north and in the southeast corner. The subject site is consistent with the future land -use element. Page 26 16J1 August 7, zooi Here, this is a copy of the future land -use map. The sub j ect site where the arrow points is urban residential. It has a base density of four units per acre in this area. The petitioner is proposing development of three units per acre. The village center commercial is consistent with the PUD requirements for location of the village center. It's consistent with all elements of the Growth Management Plan. If you have any questions, I'll be happy to answer them. Otherwise, Mr. Lenberger will do the environmental review. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Questions. Yes, ma'am. MS. SANTORO: Is it within the growth management line? I thought it was -- MR. BELLOWS: The growth management line? MS. SANTORO: Yeah. I thought it was a mile west of 951. MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. The striped area here is the urban fringe. This area here is -- you can't see it very well on this map, but it's yellow. It's the urban residential area, so it is designated urban residential. So the one -mile part goes -- it stretches out right up to this line right here. Maybe I can zero in on it a little more. The line comes up here and here, and that's basically urban residential, the same as up in here. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. MR. CARLSON: Your map is not as good as the Deltona settlement map. MR. BELLOWS: No, it's not as good. I'll never get a better quality map. Is that it? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yeah. Mr. Lenberger. MR. LENBERGER: For the record, Stephen Lenberger, development services. The subject property is located on the East Trail. The area along the wall shows the site outlined in red. Most of the site -- and it's a little deceiving looking at the aerial -- is disturbed Page 27 16J1 August 7, zooi and altered. Historically, there was a project called the Naples Isle project. It was supposed to be a subdivision. With approval of that subdivision -- and Stan and I looked in the file at the site plan --.this lake was dug. The fill was dumped in the surrounding area. And although it � looks vegetated around the area indicated as lake, �� much of it is dust Brazilian pepper, Australian pine, just exotics and grasses. The subject property is located -- a portion of the subject property is located in the Deltona settlement area, and that would be the larger piece here. This area is identified as this red block north of Tamiami Trail on the Deltona settlement map, and it's all indicated in red as an area to be developed in the Deltona settlement area. This portion here, 21 acres, is outside the Deltona settlement area. Native habitats on site are primarily restricted to this portion of the property outside the settlement area, and they're mostly pine flatwoods, pine cypress mix, as well as some palmetto prairies. There is some cypress in this portion of the property. as well as some live oak area. I believe it's in this area right here. For impacts to wetlands, the subject site has 71.46 acres of wetlands. Pretty much most of the area outside the Deltona settlement area is wetlands. There are some uplands in there, obviously the palmetto prairie, but most of it is wetlands. The petitioner will be impacting 84 percent of the wetlands on site. Now, granted, a lot of those wetlands fall within the Deltona settlement area. The petitioner will also be impacting a fair amount of wetlands here. As mitigation for those wetland impacts, the petitioner is proposing to create wetlands along the north portion of the property in this area on the aerial, as well as this portion here, putting the cypress area in this portion down here. The subject property is indicated right here. This is the Naples Page 28 Au I Reserve PUD, which I believe is currently under construction right now. The reason they're doing the mitigation at the north end of the preserve is to align with the preservation at the south end of Naples Reserve. If you're not familiar with Naples Reserve, the native vegetation on the property pretty much is in this corner of the property. There were some native areas here, but most of this is farm field. That's why they have most of the preserve at this end of the property. They did a protected species survey on site. They didn't find any. The project meets the 25 percent native vegetation requirement. They're preserve 25 acres -- I mean, 21 acres of vegetation on the site. Technically, they would only have to preserve 5.25 acres for impacting this portion outside the Deltona settlement area. The petitioner is here, as well as their environmental consultant, to answer any questions you may have. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. Go ahead. MR. CARLSON: So when the Deltona settlement deal was cut, the areas in red were exempted from preserve requirements -- natural -- from preserve requirements; is that correct? MR. LENBERGER: That's right. They were identified as developable areas. Some of them were indicated in the EIS done by the Army Corps of Engineers as uplands. Some were just indicated as areas to be for construction, but they're all identified areas for development. MR. CARLSON: That's the crux of my question here. Did the regulatory agencies say, "We're not going to exert jurisdiction over the wetlands in those red areas "? MR. LENBERGER: Pretty much no mitigation is required. That's my understanding in areas indicated in red on that map in the Deltona settlement area. And there's no preservation by the county Page 29 Augus�7; 2401 for areas indicated in red on that map because the lands were set aside in other portions of the Deltona settlement area to satisfy the county's requirement. MR. CARLSON: I mean, that's a really important question. Is there an expert in the house? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: The petitioner may have a comment on it. MR. PASSARELLA: Good morning. Ken Passarella with Passarella & Associates here on behalf of the petitioner. Real quick, I'm not a, quote, expert on the Deltona settlement agreement. It was before my time. But I can tell you it's my understanding that the areas in red did have identified wetlands on them, and the wetland impacts were assumed when they colored those areas in as red. And the areas or the remainder of the property was set aside as mitigation for those impacts. So the wetlands that are being impacted in the areas in red were accounted for by the preservation of the remainder of the wetlands on the property. So there was mitigation done. As Steve mentioned those areas are considered mitigated for. So there are wetlands on the property that have to be accounted for with the water management district. They keep a running tabulation of all the wetlands within those development areas, and they account for those impacts. It's an internal bookkeeping process. But all the mitigation has been done up front by the preservation and the setting aside of those other areas on the map. MR. CARLSON: Which would be the areas that look black to me? MR. PASSARELLA: Correct, yes. MR. LENBERGER: Yeah. Both of the areas, black and blue. Some of it is open water bodies, of course. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. Mr. Hill. MR. HILL: Correct me if I'm wrong, but Naples Reserve came Page 30 August before us a couple years ago, and as I remember, they made some definite strides toward handling the waterflow south from their property. Does anybody remember that? Is that going to flow on to this property? MR. CHRZANOWSKI: Stan Chrzanowski from community development. I think July Adarmes has been pursuing that with the developer. The water management district has looked at it. I don't know. I don't remember which way they're running their water. MR. HILL: It seems to me they made a very, very concerted effort to handle that flowing south, and I didn't see anything in the staff report relative to that. MS. MINOR: Good morning. My name is July Adarmes Minor, senior engineer for the stormwater management department. I spoke to the district a couple of days ago to understand this project a little bit better. The Naples Reserve is not taking any off -site flows. The Winding Cypress, which is on 951, is taking most of the off -site flows in that big region. So this one has old berm around it. There's no off -site flows coming into this project, the Walnut Lakes, or the Naples Reserve. They are discharging directly into 41 through their access road; is that correct? MR. PASSARELLA: Yes. MR. HILL: I stand corrected. It was Winding Cypress that came before us that had the -- MS. MINOR: And they're taking all the outside flows. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Those Winding Cypress guys are really good guys. MR. HILL: Really? Do you have that on good authority, Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Uh -huh. MR. HILL: Yeah. It was Winding Cypress. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Do we have further Page 31 16J1 August 7, aooi questions for staff or for petitioner? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Again, hearing none, what's the pleasure? Have we heard from everyone? We heard Steve. We heard everybody involved; right? Okay. MR. HILL: I have one just very minor one. I don't know. On page 2 of the staff report, it says the final density will be approximately three units per acre. Does the petitioner have any more exact figure than that? MS. BISHOP: Karen Bishop, agent for the owner. Density -- we're asking for three units to each acre. It may end up being less by virtue of how many single family you do versus how many assisted living. We have a conversion rate in there for assisted living to single- family and multi - family units. So at this time we can't really do that. Actually, most of my projects end up building less just by virtue of whatever the market is. So they may start out saying, "Here's the maximum we're going to do," but it's all based on what the market is going to bear. MR. HILL: Part of the case was to reduce it from 4 to 3, and then approximately 3 to -- I was just curious if you had a better figure. MS. BISHOP: No, sir. MR. CARLSON: Since you're there. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Go right ahead, Mr. Carlson. MR. CARLSON: Would you describe what the preserve area is going to look like at the north end of this project and how it's going to integrate with the one to the north. Is it all going to be planted from a scraped downgrade, or is there something there already that can be preserved? MR. PASSARELLA: Well, let me go to the map over there, if I may. As Steve mentioned what we tried to do is tie into the Naples Page 32 August ], jj Reserve preserve area located to the north of the site. Unfortunately, this part of the site here, as Steve described, has been previously disturbed. This area was all ag field, as far as I know, back as far as in the '70s, and then around 1980 they excavated the lake here, and then they spread the fill around the property. So this stuff was all disturbed. There has been some revegetation that has happened naturally in this area here, and we're trying to save some of those cypress areas that have come back naturally. This area up here is -- there's really nothing there worth saving at this point. So this is a system we're going to have to actually restore. We're going to have to move some dirt, and we're going to have to come in and plant vegetation. The idea here is that we're going to be planting a forested system, so we're going to be planting with, you know, cypress and pine and material like that. We're going to try to tie it into this system here. We're going to preserve a portion of this area here so we can create this connection and bring it on up into here. Unfortunately, the area that is existing native vegetation, if we were to stay out of this area, this area would become isolated within the landscape surrounded by this development, and this development, and this neighborhood over here. And then there's more ag over here that will -- you know, that's over in this area that's already developed. So what we try to do is create something in here that would compliment the preserve area to the north. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay? MR. CARLSON: Okay. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: All right. Any other questions for staff or for the petitioner? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: All right. Hearing none, what's the Page 33 August T, 2001 pleasure of the council? MR. CARLSON: Okay. When I look at this project, I hate the 80 percent wetland loss, but I think there's -- it's a very unusual project with the predisturbance and it's location in the Deltona settlement area, so I'm going to move for approval. MR. COE: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Moved by Mr. Carlson and seconded by Mr. Coe. Questions? Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing none, all in favor of Mr. Carlson's motion signify by saying aye. MR. SOLING: Aye. MR. COE: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Aye. MR. CARLSON: Aye. MS. LYNNE: Aye. MR. HILL: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed, same sign. MS. SANTORO: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Motion passes 6 -1. Okay. MR. BELLOWS: For the record, my name is Ray Bellows. The petitioner is requesting to amend the Indigo Lakes PUD to add approximately 40 acres of land to the site without changing the actual number of dwelling units approved for the existing Indigo Lakes PUD. As a result the density from the proposed additional land will decrease from 3.14 dwelling units per acre to 2.43 dwelling units per acre. As you can see on the visualizer, the subject site is located on the west side of County Road 951 just south of the elementary school. It goes back in along the section line. In the petitioner's project, the added land is located to the south. Page 34 Auguls T JJ I have a copy of the master plan to show where the added lands are. Basically, the agriculture zoned lands are along this portion of the southern property line and then down in here. The amendment is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and the Future Land Use Element since none of the previously approved density will be increased or the number of dwelling units will be increased and no other use changes are proposed. They're just adding these additional lands. I'll be happy to answer any questions. Oh -- and I'd also like to point out that I have a memo from stormwater management. They would like the petitioner to add two stipulations to the stormwater management section of the PUD document. The first one is prior to approval of construction plans, a 20 -foot drainage easement along the west property line of the parcels shall be dedicated to the county for access and maintenance of the adjacent canal as required by the Harvey Basin stormwater management plan. The second stipulation is Section 4.9 of the PUD document shall be revised to read, " Stormwater management" department director instead of "water management." That's all I have as additional stipulations. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Steve, do we have any questions? Any questions of staff? MR. LENBERGER: For the record, Stephen Lenberger, development services. The Indigo Lakes PUD is an existing PUD, as Ray mentioned. The petition here is to add two 20 -acre parcels roughly here and here. It's these pieces right here. From the map it looks like the native vegetation preservation was pretty scant. It only included these two areas. You have to remember that much of Indigo Lakes PUD was farm field historically. You can see that on this aerial. These are the two parcels to be added. This is some of the original PUD. You can see it was a farm. Page 35 16J1 August 7, aooi Vegetation on site is mostly pine- cypress mix, pine. This particular site is heavily impacted with melaleuca. Of the 40 acres to be added to the PUD, about 25 acres are wetlands. The petitioner will be impacting almost 18 acres of wetlands. As far as mitigation is concerned, the petitioner will have some preservation areas, and they will do on -site restoration and removal of exotics as well as replanting of the native species. They have proposed some off -site mitigation. The last I heard it was 1.46 mitigation credits to purchase the site. The protected- species survey did not reveal any protected species on site. Do you have any questions? I would be glad to answer them. The petitioner is here as well as their environmental consultant. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Questions for staff? Questions for the petitioner? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I'd just like to ask a question of the petitioner. I mean, it's got to run -- I don't quite follow you. I see the additional land, but just run through what you guys are doing here. MR. PASSARELLA: As far as the two additional parcels there? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. PASSARELLA: Sure. Ken Passarella with Passarella & Associates. I'm here on behalf of the petitioner. The project is for the addition of two 20 -acre parcels, as Steve described, on the south end of Indigo Lakes. The idea there is to add additional residential units in those areas. I have the project planner and project engineer to address specific questions as far as the units and the road layout and the lakes and that type of thing. With respect to the environmental items, those areas south of the existing Indigo Lake, as Steve mentioned, are heavily infested with melaleuca. There are jurisdictional wetlands in there which we will be impacting. We have set up a preserve area on site and are looking Page 36 August ��o1 at mitigating off -site for wetland impacts. Now, specific questions to the site plan, I can have somebody else answer those if that's what you have. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Questions? MR. SOLING: I have a question. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. SOLING: Just out of curiosity, you're adding housing on these two sites, and you're adding roads from the existing site. Do you have houses where the roads are being extended, or have you left the space vacant to build onto? I'm just curious. MS. BISHOP: Karen Bishop, agent for the owner. We originally had plans that showed housing along those. We are in the process now after our petition is completed to replat those area. We have not built those into those areas. That's a phase: That's for the future. But we will be changing that design to accommodate the access through this project, the existing project. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Do we have any input from the public on this item? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing none, do we have any further questions for the petitioner? Yes, sir, Mr. Carlson. MR. CARLSON: Just so I completely understand, you're adding 40 acres to the site which is dominated by jurisdictional wetlands. You're not asking for additional units, but you're going to relocate units that were already approved into jurisdictional wetland areas. Is that just -- is the goal there just to lower the density of the development? MS. BISHOP: No, sir. Actually, when you look at this whole neighborhood where these last pieces are, this is predominantly in the area of these 20 -acre parcels. You're bounded on the north by Indigo Page 37 August 4011 Lakes. You're bounded on the west by Island Walk. You're bounded on the east by 951. You're bounded on the south by Wolfe's Road. What you have there is a series of these 20 -acre parcels, some farm, some not, and what has happened over the years -- Island Walk used to be a big farm field, and they had these huge pipes. For years and years and years there was pumping in this area. What has happened is the pumping stopped, and now you're getting a tremendous amount of melaleuca and infestations there. What's happening is the district has looked at this area as a whole and has seen that each of these 20 -acre parcels could be developed on their own, and access to these pieces are going to disjoint this whole section. There's no flow -way here. The stuff is becoming highly infested. And so what they're looking at is trying to create corridors of preserves from project to project, which is what we're doing. Our project preserve connects to another approved project called Brittany Bay, which has some preserves to it. So what we're trying to do is trying to create a corridor out of these disjointed 20 -acre parcels. Some of these people, I think, at one time had tried to assimilate a bunch of them together. I think farther south there's some other cypress heads that are nicer, and it doesn't work out that those are going to be in development. In any kind of development scheme that I can see, those are definitely going to preserve -- this is, like, the fringes of those areas that the district is looking at as trying to keep continuity for preserves. MR. CARLSON: Then why wouldn't it be appropriate to have a preserve on the south boundary of that southeast corner? MS. BISHOP: Actually -- MR. CARLSON: You can almost hook those up and then on the -- you can almost hook those preserves up across the south end of this property. MS. BISHOP: Actually, during our negotiations with the Page 38 Au it 4,11 district, we, in fact, have done that. That master plan will be updated based on the latest district's agreement. We are in the process now of doing that, but they did negotiate with us to do that. I do have a picture of what the plan is going to look like, but it does, in fact, wrap around that bottom piece now. MR. CARLSON: So does that mean there's less wetland impact? MR. PASSARELLA: Yes. If you were to look at your EIS -- I don't know -- Figure 4 in the actual document. MR. CARLSON: Is there a page? MR. PASSARELLA: That would be page 8. I'll step over to the drawing that Steve just put up over there. MR. PASSARELLA: This is preserve on the existing Indigo Lakes, this little corner here. This was the proposed preserve here. This preserve area has been added to the plan. So this ties in down here, and then this preserve is here. When this piece would be developed, this preserve would then connect up through here, and this preserve connects to another off -site preserve over here. MR. CARLSON: You could connect them in this project right there. MR. PAS SARELLA: Right there. Well, what we did was in negotiating out this with the water management district, these are the areas that made sense to connect the preserve up. The habitat in this area is of poor quality, and the idea was that this piece -- when this piece comes in, all these would be connected up together. MR. CARLSON: Are you saying that -- MS. BISHOP: Excuse me. Those are uplands too. Karen Bishop, again, for the agent. Those are uplands on that one corner there, not wetlands. So we are not impacting wetlands there. MR. CARLSON: But since you are impacting 80 percent of the wetlands that you're acquiring, it would be nice to have some upland Page 39 16J1 August 7, aooi preservation there. MR. PASSARELLA: Those areas have been disturbed from the farm fields, and there's really not much native vegetation left in that little corner there. So there's really not much left to preserve. MR. CARLSON: All right. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yes, ma'am. MS. LYNNE: I don't understand. The point of wetlands -- the county policy is to direct development away from impacting wetlands. You have clustered the development all in one place and have approved that, and now you're asking us to move that development into wetlands, and that seems like the opposite of county policy. MR. PASSARELLA: As Karen touched upon, we have been looking at this area from a bigger picture. Unfortunately there was -- Tim Durham from WilsonMiller was going to be here, and he's working on a study that's looking at these areas from a standpoint of what's in the basin and working with the water management district on identifying areas that, from a basin -wide standpoint, are areas that they can identify as impacts without creating overall cumulative impacts within the basin. This Harvey Basin area here -- and I can put up a little aerial I have and try to explain this the best I can. Unfortunately Tim's not here. I don't know how well you can see this aerial here, especially all the . way down at the far end there, but this is the project site right here. This is a recent aerial of the property. These are the two additional 20 -acre parcels that we're looking at right here. The ownership pattern, as Karen mentioned, in this area is scattered. These are 20 -acre pieces that are coming in and being developed either one or two together or by themselves or three to four together. This area is building in and developing in here. Now, the water management district has looked at this area from Page 40 1 Au o, OJ the standpoint of what the existing vegetation is, the current hydrology of this area, the potential for restoring or creating flow - ways through this area, as part of the overall West Collier drainage basin. And this is a particular area where they've looked at, and we've got a high degree of exotic infestation in here. We've got problems with the hydrology and the wetland. As Karen mentioned, historically, these farm fields here used to pump into these wetlands here; that would alter the hydrology during the wet season. When there was too much water, they dumped all the water in here, and these areas had elevated water levels. During the dry season, there wasn't water there because the farm fields were using the water themselves, and these wetlands remain dry. The draining in this area from the Cocohatchee Canal north and the canal on 951 and all the other drainage areas or ditches have basically drained these wetlands. Historically, a good portion of this area was jurisdictional wetlands. To date, the majority of the wetlands up in this area are no longer jurisdictional. They have not been exerted jurisdiction over by the agencies. So this is a system that's in decline. It's -- the hydrology is no longer there to support these wetlands. You have exotic infestation coming into these areas, and you have an ownership pattern that doesn't allow or lend itself to preserving large portions of this. As such, based on the study that Tim Durham had been working on and in working with the water management district, they have identified this area as an area that would be acceptable as far as wetland impacts, where other parts of the basin, around here in the West Collier Basin, you know, may not be acceptable for impacts. But that's why we're moving into these areas in here, because the water management district and the Corps of Engineers and other folks have looked at this and identified this area as an area that would be Page 41 16J1 August 7, 2001 acceptable for wetland impacts. MR. CARLSON: Have we got some documentation of that with this? MR. PASSARELLA: Unfortunately, one, we were hoping that Tim would be here and, two, we were hoping that the water management staff would be here. Unfortunately, Karen Johnson is not here, because she's been part of those negotiations. They've been also working with Rob Robbins in the West Palm Beach office on this as well, so I can't speak on their behalf. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, ma'am. MS. LYNNE: For staff, in the new wetlands policy where Class III would be the most disturbed type wetlands, what was the major impact we're considering for those, I mean, the maximum amount of impact for Class III wetlands? MR. LORENZ: For the record, Bill Lorenz, natural resources director. We specified 50 percent that's allowed to be directly impacted. We would allow it to go all the way up to 100 percent if there was appropriate offsetting upland mitigation. MS. LYNNE: If there were appropriate -- MR. LORENZ: Offsetting upland protection. MS. LYNNE: Okay. And then how much -- what's the percentage impact on this new additional property? MR. PASSARELLA: We're looking at 63 percent, so we're slightly above the 50 percent. MS. LYNNE: So 20 percent above the 50 percent. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: 13 percent. Okay. Other questions for the petitioner? Staff? No one from the public wants to comment on it? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: What's the pleasure? MR. SOLING: I'll move for approval. Page 42 1 August 0, 0J CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. Soling moves for approval. Do I hear a second? MR. CARLSON: Discussion. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Mr. Carlson. Questions? Discussion? MR. CARLSON: I hate to be put in this spot. You know, I don't think this was complete as presented. We don't. have the documentation from the district. Even if the district wasn't here, any kind of correspondence or anything from them with this would have helped. You know, the ordinance to avoid wetland impacts, you know, I don't understand -- I really don't understand the motivation of maintaining the density and buying wetlands and moving into them. I just -- somehow that's just not -- I just don't understand that. I would -- having heard the motion, I would not vote in favor of that at this time, but perhaps an extension where we -can get more information from the district for the overall planning in this area, because we're going to have other projects coming to us. I think we might as well know what's going on there up front. It's news to me that there's an overall plan for this basin, and if we've got projects coming to us, I mean, we need to know that. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Could you request the maker of the motion to revise his motion to add such language? Mr. Soling, would you be willing to do that? MR. SOLING: Yes, I would. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: And that revision would be to request a continuance until we have South Florida -- now, what would that do to us on the schedule before the Planning Commission and the County Commission? MS. BURGESON: It would just require that -- in the past the Planning Commission has required that petitions go to the EAC prior Page 43 16J1 August 7, 2001 to them hearing them. So if it is scheduled to go to CCPC later this month, they would just need to continue that or reschedule that hearing. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yes, ma'am. MS. STUDENT: Just a point of clarification. Is the motion then being amended by the motion maker from one of approval to a continuance? MR. SOLING: Yes. MS. STUDENT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, ma'am. MS. LYNNE: I'd like to agree with Mr. Carlson and also ask -- I don't know who's responsible for this, but it seems to me to be a routine problem that projects are being presented to us with critical pieces of information missing. Is there anything that we can do or that staff can do when they're discussing this with petitioners to make sure that all the information is available, because this wastes everybody's time? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Steve. MR. LENBERGER: I guess the question would be, how much or what degree of information do you need as far as the wetland impacts? What are you looking for? We would be more than glad to request those of the petitioner prior to coming and writing a staff report, but we'd like to know what degree or level of comfort you're looking for. MS. LYNNE: That's a good question. But, for example, in this -- it just seem to me if -- maybe that's why we're the EAC and not staff or the petitioner. When I look at this, there's not enough information. If there's really a master plan, that should have been presented to us. That seems fairly obvious. I don't think that's something I should have to Istiggest. MS. LYNNE: That's a good question. But, for example, in this Page 44 Au- uslo, AJ -- it just seem to me if -- maybe that's why we're the EAC and not staff or the petitioner. When I look at this, there's not enough information. If there's really a master plan, that should have been presented to us. That seems fairly obvious. I don't think that's something I should have to suggest. If you guys are aware of the proposed classification systems where even a Class III -- assuming this is a Class III wetlands -- would only allow 50 percent impact, this seems to be going entirely against county -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Remember, that is not -- it's a proposed ordinance. That is not the law at this point. MS. LYNNE: This isn't the law, but the current policy does say that we are to direct development away from wetlands, and this project specifically puts current development into wetlands. So there's just a lot of problems with this. MS. BURGESON: What I can recommend from what I'm hearing you say is that if it appears to staff that the impacts to wetlands are against Collier County either comprehensive policies or Land Development Code policies, then you would ask us to present to you with the staff report justification from South Florida Water Management District for those impacts. MS. LYNNE: Yeah. Sounds great. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I think what we have here is -- and staff has done a good job presenting this. Normally Miss Johnson or somebody from the district is here to answer those kind of questions. I think your question could probably be answered if they were here. Unfortunately, they're not. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: If I may -- Stan Chrzanowski from development services. If you -all go back and check your e- mails, I think on Monday -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Exactly. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: -- you got the e-mail from Karen Page 45 16J1 August 7, Zooi Johnson saying that she would not be here -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Right. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: -- and she had no major problems with this project or with any of the other projects we heard today. I forwarded that to everyone. We always check with them a couple days ahead of time to see if they're going to be here or if they do have any problems with it. I'm not aware of any Harvey Basin study that they're doing, but I do know that about six or seven years ago John Boldt did a study on the entire Harvey Basin, and we've been going by their discharge rates and their off -site flows ever since. If the district's doing one, it's news to me, but I'd like to see it too. I don't see how it affects what's going on here. That's just -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. Carlson. MR. CARLSON: Stan, a lot of us work for a living, and we have other jobs and are on the road and out of town, as I was yesterday. So an e-mail the day before the meeting doesn't always get to me, and that sort of information should be in our package so we can review it. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: The packages are done well ahead of time. We don't always know that the district is not going to show up. This time Karen had intended on being here, but something came up, and she had to cover a meeting for Chip Merriam, so she went to that meeting instead. Like I said, with me it's always just a reminder to them, "Hey, we've got a meeting coming up. Are you coming down? And if you're not coming down, do you have anything you want me to go over with the board ?" This time she had nothing or apparently thought it was not important enough to send anybody down either. You'll probably see that when you get back and check your e- mails. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I did read the e-mail. Miss Lynne. Page 46 16JI August 7, 2001 MS. LYNNE: I didn't receive that e-mail, so I'll look into that with whoever sent it out. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: I think I'm lacking two of your e-mail addresses. I noticed that when I was sending them out. I got one back that the e -mail is no longer active either. It might have been yours. MS. LYNNE: So you may need a new e-mail address. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: Yes, ma'am. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Go ahead and check on that. MS. LYNNE: If I could just say, I do not mean this as criticism to staff. I just meant this as an observation of things that I've seen coming in here. I don't think you guys are doing anything wrong. I just see sort of a chronic problem, and I'm hoping that petitioners and staff and everybody can work together to have this information when we meet. MR. PASSARELLA: Well, I have to apologize from the standpoint that, you know, unfortunately Tim was not here. Tim is ill today, and he couldn't be here, and Karen Johnson couldn't be here. So the two people we're relying upon, you know, hopefully one of them could make it, and neither of them made it. So this was additional information that we were going to provide to the EAC to help you -all in your decision. This is no reflection on the staff report or the EIS. This was additional supporting information that we thought would be helpful in your decision. So, you know, I don't reflect that upon staff, you know, not having that in the staff report. But what we focused on in the EIS is the particulars of this particular site. This additional information became, you know, available, and we wanted to present it to you -all. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: If I could ask the petitioner a question on this. We have a motion on the table right now for a continuance. I would like to, you know, have your thoughts on your Page 47 August preference of this situation, and then put this before the council. A continuance means going back on the schedule and going back for an additional month on the Board of County Commission and Planning Commission's schedule versus proceeding as we are proceeding and taking the risk that you're going to get a negative vote from this council. Which of those two would you prefer? MS. BISHOP: Unfortunately, we really do need to move forward. With the vacation of the board as it is, the schedules being moved puts us in jeopardy of contracts that we have for that site, and we need to get moving on that. So, unfortunately, even though I certainly am sympathetic -- and believe me, the reports that Tim had - - I mean, he became very ill last night. This wasn't something that's been ongoing, or we would have had someone else come and speak for him. But we really do need to have a vote, and we really do need to move forward as much as -- and we can forward you this information, which will substantiate that. And since Karen Johnson did e-mail Stan, I feel confident that you can -- she would have spoken up had there been a problem, like she does on any other project that comes before you, so I would respectfully request a vote. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. What's the pleasure? Mr. Soling? MR. SOLING: I'm at a loss right now. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Excuse me? MS. LYNNE: Which way do you want to go on your motion? MR. SOLING: I guess I'll go back to my original motion, and we'll see how it goes. I move the approval. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, ma'am. MS. LYNNE: I have a question. Is it up to the petitioner for whether we do a continuance? Can we vote for a continuance? I mean, is that -- Page 48 August 6� A CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: No. It's not up to the petitioner, but I just asked the petitioner to let council know what their preference would be. MS. LYNNE: Okay. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Now, if the maker of the motion after hearing that from the petitioner determines that he would like to revise his motion, that's entirely up to the maker of the motion. If the motion fails and we want to put another motion on the table, I don't know where we go from there. The first time we had a motion on the table to approve the project. We had a second to that motion from Mr. Carlson. Do you continue with that second, Mr. Carlson? Hill. MR. CARLSON: No. I withdraw my second. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. What's the pleasure? Mr. MR. HILL: I can be sympathetic towards what we've before been asking from water management and perhaps the Harvey Basin study. To me we are looking at it as having a non - negative impact on the rest of it rather than a positive impact. I don't see a justification for approving this expansion and encroachment into questionable lands simply by saying we don't think it's going to negatively impact the rest of those areas. I would vote for disapproval as presented. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. We don't have a second to the motion that's on the table right now, so the motion dies for lack of a second. Okay. Do we have a replacement motion? MR. CARLSON: I'll move -- I appreciate your problems with timing, but I would move to continue until we get further information on this, specifically from the water management district and not just WilsonMiller. MS. STUDENT: Just a point of clarification. Would that be a Page 49 16J1 August 7, Zooi continuance, then, until the September meeting? MR. CARLSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. There's a motion on the table by Mr. Carlson to continue this item until the September meeting and request staff and the petitioner to have information to us from South Florida and their professionals additionally. MS. SANTORO: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Second by Santoro. Any questions on that or discussion on that motion? MR. HILL: I prefer we go the other way. If you're going to assist the petitioner, I'd rather us go through, in my mind, with a disapproval which would allow it to go through into*the process but with our disapproval based on not having proper information. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I concur with you, sir, but that motion failed for lack of a second, so let's vote on what we have. We have a motion on the table for a continuance. All in favor of that motion signify by saying aye. MR. SOLING: Aye. MS. SANTORO: Aye. MR. CARLSON: Aye. MS. LYNNE: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: That's four votes. THE COURT REPORTER: What four? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: We have Soling, Santoro, Carlson, and Lynne; correct? MR. COE: Uh -huh. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Against the motion say aye. MR. COE: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Aye. MR. HILL: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Coe, Sansbury, and Hill. So the Page 50 16J1 August 7, Zoos motion does not pass; is that correct? MS. SANTORO: Uh -huh. Try another one. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Do I hear another motion? What are we going to do here? Are we going to take action on this item? MR. HILL: I move that we recommend disapproval of this project because of insufficient information regarding the full impact of the encroachment on the lands -- the added lands in question. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. MR. HILL: And that this necessary positive -- the necessary impact be substantiated by the water management district. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Do I hear a second to that motion? MR. COE: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Seconded by Mr. Coe. Discussion. (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing none, all in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed, same sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Motion passes unanimously. Thank you very much. Miss Burgeson -- we lost our folks, didn't we? MR. COE: Yeah, they left. You may want to give her a break. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Do we need a little break? THE COURT REPORTER: Sure. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Let's take five. (A break was held from 10:35 a.m. to 10:47 a.m.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: All right. MR. HILL: Mr. Chairman -- Page 51 16J1 August 7, 2001 CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. HILL: -- when they do come back, would you ask, I guess, Barb to produce a new member list with appropriate addresses. MR. COE: I think there's one on the internet site, isn't there? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mine's getting a little -- MR. COE: I think the one on the internet site has got the names and addresses and e-mail addresses and all that business. MR. HILL: Of the council? MR. COE: I'm assuming that it's up to date. The last time I checked it was. MS. SANTORO: I had trouble getting into it. I think a printed one would be in order for everybody in case they don't have e-mail. MR. SOLING: That means you have to know the internet address. MS. SANTORO: That's right. MR. HILL: Is it Colliergov.net? MR. CARLSON: Yes. MR. HILL: That would be the web address? MR. CARLSON: And then you go to -- MR. HILL: EAC? MR. COE: I think there is a site for committees, and then it kind of gets you in there. I don't know. I just -- I don't know how to do it. I just do it. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. The young gentleman at the podium would like to speak. MR. LORENZ: Yes. Thank you. For the record, Bill Lorenz, natural resources director. The item in front of you is to have council further discuss the wetland policies. Everything that we've been doing here recently is, quite frankly, more of a discussion of the classification system that staff initially proposed, and that's the November 8th, 2000, draft that we presented to the EAC back then. Page 52 August �� 1 The other objective would be also to allow for the public to comment on the wetland policies. Again, I kind of break it down to a classification system. There was a lot of problems that everybody had with how do we bring in the idea of functionality in the classification system. Once we determine the appropriate classification system, then we can kind of go on and, look at further details of the impacts, the allowable impacts, on the wetlands with all of the -- with the additional level of details in the policy knowing, of course, to some degree some of this is an integrative process, and you go back and forth a little bit. But what I would like to try to get from the council is some really good input on what would be your preference for the classification system. Now, I have two documents here -- and I've got some extras for the public as well -- but there's two documents. One is this November 8th, 2000, document that you have been provided and are working through the comments on. The second is the document that I believe we got into your hands that says, "Possible alternatives for wetland classification, August 7, 2001, EAC meeting." This was supposed to have been mailed out to you. I can see some people have it. I see some people -- okay, everybody has it. MR. CARLSON: I've got that one, but what was that first document? MR. LORENZ: This was the original GOPs, the county -wide policies. MR. CARLSON: Okay. MR. LORENZ: Again, for the public, we've got some extra copies up here. Let me first just run down it just so everybody has the appropriate context here. Working off of this document, which is the possible alternatives for wetland classifications, again, the current proposal that you have -- that we have is -- we looked at the initial descriptions of the wetlands, the functional descriptions then, having Page 53 AuSlYROdI columns for melaleuca, hydrologic connection, and wetland vegetation. It seems like for the comments that we received from not only the council but everybody else, it pretty much doesn't seem to be pursuing that particular alternative. So I think we can, to some degree, put that aside. The second alternative that we can look at is, to some degree, have a proposal for looking at the school of classification scheme of Class I, Class II, Class III, and then incorporated WRAP scores. And when I say the WRAP score, for the public, it's the -- WRAP is an acronym for Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure. This particular procedure is being conducted by the South Florida Water Management District. So it's a kind of functional assessment. I'll let everybody also know that the state is pursuing a uniform functional assessment methodology, and ultimately -- certainly it's staff s recommendation whatever the state adopts we should be using that functional assessment. Sometimes I'll say WRAP and functional assessment, and at the moment I'm kind of meaning the two terms to be the same thing. Then we have the ability to specify the classification of wetlands and modify them based upon their functional assessment. Typically 100 percent functional assessment means that you have 100 percent functioning wetlands that -- it's doing everything that it's supposed to do. On the other end of the scale, as you get closer and closer to zero, you basically have a trash system that's so altered that it doesn't perform a lot of functions. The other thing you need to realize is in terms of the functional assessment systems, both the WRAP with the South Florida Water Management District and the state system that's proposed -- they basically concentrate on vegetation and wildlife issues. They do not provide functional assessment for storage, flood attenuation, and for recharge. So you have to realize that even though we're modifying Page 54 �l AU0, 401 the functional assessment here, it doesn't encompass those other functions. So you have to keep that in mind. However, it's still a very good tool for us to try to identify certain wetland systems that are so severely altered that they no longer function properly. Therefore, our classification system, then, is dependent upon a WRAP or functional assessment score. And that's basically the Alternative II that we provided for you to review, and we can get more detailed in that. In fact, you have the report -- you have the report that I provided to look at the classification systems -- Class I, Class II, Class III -- using the functional assessment. If I can get Barbara to hand this out. I know she's also handed out some comments that we received from one of the biological consultants in town, and I've kind of summarized his classification system in a tabular form just so we can talk about some of the elements again. MS. LYNNE: Excuse me. Did you say that we have some kind of recommendation from a biologist? Which is that? MR. LORENZ: Barbara, did you pass that out? MS. BURGESON: Did I hand it out? MS. LYNNE: It's titled "I. Wetlands Protection." MR. LORENZ: It has a -- on the right -hand side it has "Draft -2 (8- 20 -01)" on it. MS. LYNNE: Okay. Thank you. MR. LORENZ: We did receive some written comments for that. In this particular alternative, he's incorporated size into the classification system. So he's looking at making some breaks of greater or less than 10 acres tied with the functional assessment, and he also basically broke the descriptions down for the wetlands looking at a natural surface water body and adjacent wetland buffer and then any other wetland. So that's the approach that he's kind of taken. Page 55 1 Au o,401 Again, if I summarized the table of my handwritten notes for you, it should match up with the text. But my whole point here, simply for illustration purposes, is that this is another way of trying to look at an alternative classification system that takes into account size, wetland type, and functional assessment. ultimately Again, breaking it down into three classifications, y y ou have to answer the question, "Why is it important to classify the wetlands ?" It's because each classification is going to have a different set of rules written for it in terms of how much of that wetland will be allowed to have direct impact that ultimately will still be mitigated for. But the higher - functioning wetlands system is going to have the least amount of wetland impacts. The wetland systems that -- the Class III systems are going to have higher allowable impacts, so that's ultimately what were getting at. I MR. CARLSON: I think there is a dilemna here. You know, know part of the Governor's order directs us to classify -- to have classifications of wetlands so, you know, we feel this, you know, need to classify these wetlands. We wind up with a classification system that rates them, and in that we include size. You could have a small isolated wetland that's extremely important and perfectly functional, but just because of its size i t s classified at a lower level. I dust think that's wrong. I mean, it is wrong. Some of those small isolated wetlands with certain, you know, special populations of amphibians should have, you know, a value above Class I because they're unique, and they're supporting a special species. But we automatically downgrade them because they're a small wetland. I dust think we're going in the wrong direction here. I don't think we're sensitive to the ecology behind what we're trying to do. MR. LORENZ: Well, I think if you wanted to elevate or have some criteria for, let's say, a small isolated wetland system that Page 56 16J1 August 7, aooi embodies certain characteristics, we could draft -- if we have those characteristics, specify them, and we could raise that to a level of Class I if you're so inclined. MR. CARLSON: That's why I don't think, you know, classifying them by size should be that important. I mean, if they're hydrologically intact and functioning, they should automatically be a Class I wetland. MR. LORENZ: Okay. Well, this is -- that leads down to the Alternative III that staff has just put on the table for consideration, whereby the allowable impact is determined solely by the functional assessment or the WRAP such that the impacts are proportional to the WRAP -- to basically the WRAP score. Then size doesn't enter into it at all. Location doesn't enter into it at all or type of wetland, whether it's marine, you know, a tidal wetland or a freshwater wetland, or whether it's an isolated wetland or any other characteristics that we want to give it. You just simply say that the allowable impacts are solely dependent upon the functional assessment. So what I've tried to outline for you here is the starting point where we started back almost a year ago in terms of an initial attempt at a classification scheme. There's several different alternatives for your consideration to get to in terms of the classification. Ultimately, of course, the goal is to adopt policies that translate into what we will allow the impacts to be under that broad direction from 9(J)5 that we need to -- after considering the values, types, sizes, and locations of wetland systems in Collier County, we are to direct incompatible land uses away from those systems. Also, that's recognizing that mitigation is always an option. The state criteria for the comp plan allows for that. MS. LYNNE: Mr. Chairman -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yeah. Go ahead. Page 57 16J1 August 7, 2001 MS. LYNNE: I've been looking over the WRAP policy. It's 1997, so I assume there's been some updates on it. But, basically, it uses -- instead of the categories that we've been presented in the past, it utilizes wildlife utilization, wetlands, overstory, shrub, canopy, wetlands vegetative groundcover, adjacent upland - wetland buffer, field indicators of wetland hydrology, water quality input and treatment system. Not being an expert in those things, it still looks like a pretty good system to me. It's looking at functionality. Its looking at the species that are there. If something's really functioning well and has the high - quality native vegetation and animal life and water quality, then it's going to get a high rating. I think it shows real promise. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. classification MR. HILL: When we were going through those c matrixes, I -- again, my background is not in that area -- I was very confused, and I could translate that to a petitioner and staff and everybody else trying to wind their way through that matrix of classes and functionality. Your Option III, which was discussed in great length by our subcommittee, seemed to me to take away all of these potential pitfalls and is very straightforward and includes basically three areas p plant life, and of functionality: Wildlife, p hydrology. Any one of Y those can upgrade a wetland or grade a wetland significantly on the basis of three points for the WRAP score using those three components, and it seemed to be a very clear -cut procedure, methodology, and one which took into account all of the functions of a wetland that we want to preserve and condensed it into a fairly straightforward procedure. I don't know how Ali and Ed feel about that, but that's -- MR. CARLSON: Yeah. I mean, the idea is -- we've been -- well, I've been at this reviewing projects for over a year now. You Page 58 16J1 August 7, zooi know, we're presented with jurisdictional wetlands, and we don't say, "Well, are those flow -way wetlands? Are they adjacent to a water body? Are they this? Are they that ?" No. They're jurisdictional wetlands. They're wetlands, you know. Then we say, "Well, what's the hydrology like? You know, are they viable? What's the exotics invasion? Any special listed species there ?" So these are the things we do, you know, month after month after month as we review wetlands on those three criterias. That's what this graph has boiled down to, basically. MR. HILL: I don't know how we want to proceed from here, Mr. Chairman, but if it's appropriate I'd like to move that council -- MR. COE: Public comment. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Public comment. I'm sorry. Yes, sir. Michael. MR. SIMONIK: Good morning. Michael Simonik with The Conservancy of Southwest Florida. Eventually I'm going to try and be high tech and use this, so that's why I came to this podium. I think it was over a year ago when I came before the EAC and brought with me ordinances and documents from another county that has a no net -loss wetlands policy. That's really what I was looking for and The Conservancy was hoping we'd see in Collier County, no net loss of wetlands. We have not been critical of the process up until today and are still very supportive of going through with these wetland policies that staff has brought forward to you today. I'm glad -- I heard something this morning about not caring about the size. Size doesn't matter. I totally agree with Ed on that. And I'm glad we're going to include the three components: Wildlife, vegetation, and hydrology. I understand that those aren't all three included in WRAP, so I don't know what the state's going to bring -- Page 59 16J1 August 7, aooi CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yeah, they are. MR. SIMONIK: They are? All three are included in WRAP. Okay. But not storage and recharge? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: That's right. wetlands MR. SIMONIK: Storage and recharge. So somehow we have more value than WRAP says they have, I guess, is my point, and a lot of us know that. A lot of people who are interested in preserving wetlands don't really care if there's exotics on them. They're a wetland. They don't really care what the alterations have been. They're wetlands that need to be preserved. That's a lot of thought, a lot of people, but not mine today because I think we have to balance some private - property rights with wetlands protection. When I came here a year ago, it was because we had seen so much wetland loss in this county. And month after month, week after week I sit in the audience and watch things go through the EAC, the Planning Commission, the Board of County Commissioners, through the water management district, through the Army Corps of Engineers with wetland loss in this county and Southwest Florida. So now I'm going to give it to you visually. I'm going to get high tech. A couple weeks ago I had one of our interns investigate wetland loss in Lee and Collier County as permitted by the water management district. They have been working on it themselves as well, and they supplied us with the document of all of the approvals in 1999, year 2000, and the first 6 months of 2001. This is total wetland acreage loss in Collier and Lee County. Those are not numbers to be proud of in our county. I did this because I read in the National Geographic last month that throughout the country 20,000 acres of wetlands are impacted a -year. That s 20,000 for the whole country. We're looking at close to a thousand in the y ear 2001 for the first six months. That says 5 percent of wetland loss in the United States of America in the year 2001 is going to Page 60 16J1 August 7, Zooi occur in Collier County, one of 67 counties in the State of Florida, one of 50 states in the union. We should be embarrassed by that. That's why we need to push this wetland ordinance, these wetland policies through. The numbers show it all. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. Hill -- MR. SIMONIK: I know that the policies have -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: -- do you have a question? MR. SIMONIK: Do you have a question? MR. HILL: I was just wondering, was mitigation taken into account? MR. SIMONIK: This with wetlands impacted through permitting. MR. HILL: But it does not account for wetlands that were mitigated off site? MR. SIMONIK: There are no new wetlands created. There are sometimes enhanced and improved wetlands that already exist. So we still lose area -wide net loss of wetlands when we impact them. These are -- they've all been mitigated for. Everything permitted is mitigated for, for sure. Absolutely. I'm just saying that this is the impacts we're permitting of wetlands that are then mitigated for. That doesn't mean we gain wetlands. It's not a one to one if you ask me. It's not at all one to one. We've lost these wetlands. So that's really my point and has been my point for a year, that we need a wetlands ordinance and policies in this county. We cannot rely on the state. We cannot rely on the federal government. We have to rely on our own county ordinances and policies to take care of the obligation that we have in this county to protect the natural resources of this county. I think that's all I have. MR. CARLSON: Well -- Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. Go right ahead. MR. CARLSON: Well, amen. He's preaching to the converted Page 61 Auxf7; ZOIII up here. Now, listen, so where is your proposed ordinances? MR. SIMONIK: We're supportive -- that's what I'm saying. I've been supportive of what we've been hearing from staff and what I just heard this morning, too, making sure that we're not talking about the size of it. MR. CARLSON: Well, would you give us an official Conservancy review of our proposal? MR. SIMONIK: I think we support it. It doesn't go below a 50 percent loss. What I asked for and what The Conservancy's position is is no net loss. So that line might start at 5 percent of 100 percent functionality and go straight across the bottom all the way to 50 percent regardless of functionality. It stays at 5 percent, and 5 percent because we do believe there are truly unavoidable impacts, like when you have to take a road from one end of the development to the other end of the development, and you've got to get through the wetlands because there's developable land on the other side of the property, so you need to take a road or utilities or something. That's unavoidable. Choosing a pretty place for your tennis courts is not unvoidable wetland impact, but that's what we hear. "Well, we can't rearrange it because, you know, that's where this has to go or that has to go." They're not trying hard enough. That's not unavoidable in my mind. Unavoidable means a crossover of a road or utilities or something like that, the bare minimum to be able to utilize the property. But that's why we're talking no net loss. So the official Conservancy position is no net loss, 5 percent across the board. But am I going to object to this? No. We're supportive of it. I wish it were better. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, ma'am. MR. SIMONIK: Lower the line. MR. CARLSON: Well -- Page 62 16J1 August 7, aooi MS. LYNNE: Go ahead. MR. CARLSON: We would love those comments. We would love to see those comments. MS. BURGESON: You can submit those in writing to staff, and we can forward them to the EAC members if you'd like. I wanted to ask you a quick question. When you're supporting 50 percent impact, are you supporting us making the exception of going above 50 percent impact to 100 percent if they're mitigating with where we make uplands, or are you supporting .a maximum of 50 percent impacts? MR. SIMONIK: I didn't understand that this went below 50 percent impact with mitigation of -- MS. BURGESON: I'm not sure if this -- MS. SANTORO: It doesn't. MR. BURGESON: -- last position -- MS. SANTORO: The proposal says that no more than 50 percent onsite wetlands can be impacted. MR. SIMONIK: Period. That's what I understand. MS. BURGESON: Okay. MR. SIMONIK: That's the third one; right? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: That's what that's saying right there. MR. SIMONIK: That's what that means. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: That's what that says right there. MR. SIMONIK: It has zero percent functionality, and we're still going to preserve 50 percent of it because I don't think we're covering all the functionality when you do that WRAP, maybe half. MS. LYNNE: When you do the graph, you're covering half functionality. What's the other half? MR. SIMONIK: The actual pieces of a wetland that we're not covering in WRAP, like recharge and a lot of other things, and things Page 63 that may not make the criteria list in a WRAP that just aren't there because NVRAP isn't good enough. MR. HILL: That was part of our rationale, that 50 percent came at zero because there's always going to be some recharge and those kind of things. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Flood control and things like that. MR. SIMONIK: You may not cover all the criteria for wildlife or vegetation and its objective, for one thing. MS. LYNNE: When I read all of this stuff and I see what the state is requiring and what -- and so and on and so forth, I get caught between what I would like to see and what seems to be possible. I would encourage The Conservancy to get all of its members to write in and say, "No more than 5 percent impact on any wetland." That's the only way it's going to change in this county. MR. SIMONIK: That's our official position, but I'm not objecting to what staff is putting forward. MS. LYNNE: I understand. I'm just encouraging more public - level comment. MR. SIMONIK: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. Hill. MR. HILL: I'm still going back to your graph, Mike. Do you consider -- when mitigation results in new wetlands off -site created or credits in Panther Island mitigation bank, wetland bank, is that built into that? I can't believe that we've lost a thousand acres, a net loss of a thousand acres in 2001, when we've mitigated and purchased rights to the Panther Island bank and created in certain cases new wetlands. So what numbers go into that thousand acres? MR. SIMONIK: Those -- you're right. All of those acres that were permitted to be impacted were all mitigated. But I don't know of any newly created wetlands out of uplands, and actually we're opposed to that. Why would you create it? Page 64 16JI Au �� MR. HILL: I agree. MR. SIMONIK: Because it never works. You can't create a wetland in an upland. You can try but -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It would be pushing it though. Isn't Panther Island creating wetlands in whole fields -- MR. COE: That's what -- MS. BURGESON: For the most part, they're enhancing wetlands as opposed to creating. They're creating where they can where the soils may accommodate that. MR. SIMONIK: And where they may have been before. MS. BURGESON: They're typically not creating new uplands - MR. SIMONIK: New wetlands. MS. BURGESON: -- or not creating new wetlands. MR. HILL: It's net loss, though, even if it's a new one out in Panther Island according to your figures. MR. SIMONIK: It's a net loss because an enhanced or improved wetland already is a wetland. So it counts in the number of wetlands we have in the county. MR. HILL: I wasn't sure that Panther Island was already a wetlands. MR. SIMONIK: I don't know what's counted as actually created, but when you go to mitigate, that's the very last thing you want to do. You want to improve and enhance, and then at the bottom of it is to create a whole new wetland. It would be nice if we could start creating them, but they don't work usually. There's reasons why they're not there in the first place. MR. CARLSON: You told -- you were here last time telling us about one in West Palm Beach that was working beautifully. MR. SIMONIK: At the wastewater treatment plant; that's true. So we can start building those, and we'll be happy. Page 65 16J1 August 7, zooi MS. LYNNE: It's also true that there's been a study recently done in the Chicago area that's showing that created and mitigated wetlands are not really working. MR. SIMONIK: We've had many studies in South Florida. The biggest study said none of them are working. I think 75 or 80 percent were not working. That was 10 or 12 years ago. I think we're getting better at it. I don't think it's 80 percent failure these days. I think it's a lot better with mitigation banks and things like that, but in the past it was a lot worse. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Let's move along. Bill. MR. LORENZ: I think it's important -- because I have these figures, too, that Michael has shown you just because here's the tabulated value. For 1999, of that 385 acres that were impacted, the total number of acres was 3,600 acres, so that was roughly 10 percent for that year. Under wetland acres created, slash, restored -- and I'm not sure of the exact definition -- that column is 545 acres. So, I mean, there is -- maybe not to take away . Michael's complete point, but there is tabulated information here for which this graph is developed, and we're going to be using that as part of our data and analysis. But for 1999 we're looking at 10 percent of those acreages were impacted. In the year 2000, it looks like there was — of the 1,300 acres that were subject to the permitting process, 373 acres were directly impacted. Now you're getting up to about 20 -some percent for that year of which 580 acres of wetlands were restored or created. They tabulate -- this information is tabulated across so you can get some of the more specific information, Bill, that you asked. But I'm interested in it from a standpoint of looking at the percentages, because when we start talking about where we fall on the percentages of allowable impacts, these are two years that the water management district has tabulated that we can kind of compare our numbers with. Page 66 A� 14�Ij, CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Very good. Bill, you started to have a discussion a little bit ago -- oh, excuse me. Yes, ma'am. I'm sorry. MS. BARNETT: Thank you. I'm Eileen Barnett, environment consultant with Vanasse & Daylor. I'll keep my comments brief. I just had an opportunity to look over this proposal recently and will be providing more comments as the process goes on. We're very supportive of using a unified method for functional assessment of wetlands. The WRAP is what was being mentioned today, and Bill and his group are aware that the state right now with the water management district are working on a unified wetlands assessment procedure that defers from WRAP. They're also taking comments, and this might be an opportunity for them to be on notice that these other factors, such as aquifer recharge and things like that, should be considered. I do appreciate The Conservancy's opinion on trying to save as much in the way of wetlands as possible. I have questions, however, about the "no net loss" or limiting net loss to 50 percent. This is a question for Bill. Maybe you can clarify it. If there are very low functioning wetlands on site that the site plan requires to be impacted, would there be an opportunity to make new wetlands somewhere else on the site or mitigate them off -site? What I'm thinking is -- I agree that it's very difficult a lot of times to create wetlands from uplands. There's a very long time lag, also, in a lot of cases to get that created wetland functioning. But on the other hand there's a category called restoration which sometimes is not differentiated from enhancement, and that is where a wetland has been so impacted that it's not even a jurisdictional wetland anymore, but the soils and the conditions can be recreated. In other words, possibly a spoil berm along a drainage ditch. That ditch may be aquatic, but it lost a lot of its wetland function.. The berm is not a Page 67 AEG s�O,40Ql wetland at all anymore. But if you took that material from the berm and put it back in the drainage ditch, that whole area would become a functioning wetland. That's usually called restoration, which may not be captured in those figures. I was just wondering. That is one example -of different opportunities where a situation may be improved for wetland function. How would that be captured in this proposal? MR. LORENZ: The way this would work is that we're saying that the allowable direct impact you have to mitigate for. So on that curve, if we go from 5 percent down to 50 percent at zero functionality, even with a zero - functioning wetland system, you still have to maintain 50 percent of those wetlands on site. Then the other 50 percent you're going to have to mitigate for. MS. BARNETT: So the 50 percent of wetlands protected on site would be where they were located in the field prior to -- well, while it was being mapped out, basically, before development. In other words, a particular pond or pit -- 50 percent of that, at least, would need to be preserved at its location, not somewhere else on the property. MR. LORENZ: That's correct. MS. BARNETT: Okay., MR. LORENZ: And we would be looking at it. I mean, we would be crafting language and looking at that as the average condition under this alternative. MS. BARNETT: Okay. MR. LORENZ: And, quite frankly, let me state this, too, from a staff perspective -- I know the subcommittee and maybe the EAC is taking a position that that third alternative is the preferred alternative. I'm not willing to say that from a staff perspective yet, but that's the preferred alternative from what we would be recommending up the line. I think we still have to have a little bit more discussion amongst Page 68 Au 1tO,4JI ourselves and the biological consulting community. But that would be -- but if we were to move with that third alternative, that line, that's how that would work out. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yes, sir. Mr. Hill. MR. HILL: I think in our -- correct me if I'm wrong, Ali and Ed -- but I think in our discussions on the subcommittee we recognized that WRAP was going to be updated -- MS. SANTORO: Yeah. MR. HILL: -- so this caption here should perhaps not refer specifically just to WRAP, but any updated -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Updated version. MR. HILL: Yeah, that's in the process. MR. LORENZ: That's correct, yeah. We would be doing that. MR. HILL: This isn't perfect, but I sure feel comfortable with it. It goes a long way towards solving the problem. If it's appropriate, Mr. Chairman, I move that the EAC go on record as recommending lt. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Do I hear a second? MR. COE: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Seconded by Mr. Coe. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: The motion on the floor is that we recommend to the county commission that this procedure set up into wetlands -- well, just verbalize it if you would, Mr. Hill, in case I mess it up, what we're voting on. MR. HILL: Okay. I move that Option III, according to the documents, Exhibit D, the graphical representation of impacts and WRAP or adjusted WRAP assessment -- that we recommend that this be a methodology of assessing and delineating impact, allowable impacts on wetlands -- I guess that's it; that's sufficient -- recognizing Page 69 AugdSto,YM1AI that the language which will be developed to accompany this will tie up any loose ends in the verbiage. Did that confuse matters or -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. It sounds good. Mr. Coe, do you concur? MR. COE: Sure. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Any further discussion on the motion? MS. SANTORO: Could I just add one word? There seems to be some confusion. Just adding "on site wetland impacts." I think there's some confusion if we're talking about wetlands on site versus mitigation. MR. HILL: I don't understand what you mean. This is on -site wetlands. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Everything is on -site wetlands. MR. HILL: Yeah. The mitigation policy would then follow, or the rider. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. All in favor of the motion signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed, same sign. (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It passes unanimously. MR. LORENZ: Then what staff will do is we'll put together the associated language with that alternative as to how the rest of the mitigation language and the impacts and some other information that we have to put together -- how that will work with your recommended classifications. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. MS. LYNNE: May I ask one more question? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, ma'am. Page 70 16J1 August 7, Zooi MS. LYNNE: Earlier we also talked about -- and Mr. Simonik brought it up about what is a justifiable impact. Is there going to be any language anywhere in here about what -- I can't remember the word. It's not justifiable, but unavoidable -- unavoidable impacts. I mean, is unavoidable impacts the second golf course, for example? MR. LORENZ: Yes, there will be language. At the moment we'll be borrowing a lot or heavily upon the language that we have currently proposed to you. Although I have seen some additional language come through, perhaps in what Barbara had passed out to you from the one commenter, and I think there's some other language that I've seen that we might be able to beef up that second draft with, so we'll be putting that language together for you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Very good. All righty. Moving right along. An update on beach events and sea turtles. MS. BURGESON: Again, Barbara Burgeson with planning services. As a result of the recent storms and the bad weather that we've had, we've had notice from the state that there will be no beach raking of the beaches until -- it's 90 days past that storm event. I believe it goes until September. Don't quote me on that. I think it's, like, September 11th from the date of the original storm event. So we've notified everyone who was issued a vehicle- on -the- beach permit that they cannot beach rake up until that time. Because what happened is a great deal of the nest markings were destroyed or washed away during those storms or those high tides. What that leaves us with is the only vehicles that are allowed on the beach are vehicles that are being used below the mean-high tide and for access through corridors that we identify and then down to that wet sand for traversing along the beach for any environmental -- typically if there's environmental work that's being done. MR. HILL: That dates back to June, not July. The major impact was in June. Page 71 AuguS 94tl1 MS. BURGESON: Again, it's 90 days past the storm event. MR. HILL: I was thinking that it would be July, which would have put it in October. MS. BURGESON: I could double check and forward that e- mail out to the EAC members. In fact, that's what I'll do when I get back to the office. I'll forward that notice from the state which gives the date of when we'll be allowed to beach rake again. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. MR. CARLSON: Since the nesting season, we commonly have storms. Is this a common occurrence for the nest markings to be washed away? MS. BURGESON: No, it's not. This was an unusual result of a combination of a number of -- most of it was the heavy rains that washed them away, and the combination, I think, with probably some of the winds. Maura is not available to be here today. I should have asked her by e -mail. MR. CARLSON: Because, certainly, we can figure out a way to mark those nests that wouldn't wash away. MS. BURGESON: What they do is they tried to get some satellite information to remark those nests. However, I understand that it's not as accurate as originally field marking them. That's why the state has requested that no beach raking occur until that 90 -day period because of the possibility of not being able to accurately remark those nests. But they're looking at a different way in the future to mark them -- MR. CARLSON: Sure. MS. BURGESON: -- to prevent something like this from happening. MR. LORENZ: Well, we can take a look at that. We've had -- I mean, in places where we lost the nest, we lost -- that scarp on the Clam Bay system was dropped down the beach about 5 feet at the Page 72 16J1 August 7> aooi dune level and in other places, you know, 18 inches to the point where we washed the whole nest away. One of our concerns is when we start driving stakes, even though we think we know where the nest is, we don't want to go too far down. MR. COE: Uh -huh. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Right. MR. LORENZ: But when you lose, you know, 18 inches of beach, whatever you've got as a stake is going to be washed away as well. But we can -- I can -- we can still ask the question and check. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Very good. One other -- just an update on old business. As you -all remember, you gave me the honor several months ago of sitting on the selection committee for the new community development/enviromnental. services administrator. I know that that -- we have been having our meetings. We had some -- oh, in excess of 35 or 45 applications for the job. The county HR staff narrowed that down to about 24 or 25 that did meet the requirements of the job description. We have then reviewed all of those resumes and have met and selected six individuals who we are going to be personally interviewing next Monday with the goal of passing three or four recommendations onto the county administrator. So that's proceeding. Okay. Growth management update. New business. Any new business? Yes, sir. MR. HILL: Could we get an updated list of addresses, numbers, and e-mail addresses of the council? MS. BURGESON: Yes. I spoke to Ali about that earlier. I'm going to mail that out when I mail out the colored map of the Deltona settlement area. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Do we have anything on the growth management update? MR. LORENZ: For the record, Bill Lorenz, natural resources Page 73 AuBUS` 411 director. I think the biggest thing to update you on is the schedule; that we're having our economist, Jim Nicholas, take a look at the transfer of the development rights program, the TDR program, and to evaluate the viability of the various density bonuses that we are proposing for vegetation preservation. That was part of the conceptual plan of the rural fringe. The feedback he's given us is he's going to have a final report for us at the end of October. So that means we're slipping on the schedule a little bit more. It's getting somewhat uncomfortable. So that's the way the time line falls out. We'll have that -- of course, we'll try to keep the EAC through its subcommittee briefed as to where that process moves forward. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Subcommittee report on growth management. MS. SANTORO: I'm trying for the second month in a row. Ed wanted me to be sure and tell you that what we're trying to do in the growth subcommittee is to look at some of the items that are coming up, to keep the EAC appraised, and to have your input. This particular item is on the use of receiving and sending. It's a device whereby -- where we want to direct activities away from natural resource areas. The device is that the person who is keeping the land out of development can sell it to a receiver. The receiver pays money for this right. The receiver can increase density in a different area. So it's one device that's being advocated. Now, I think Bill mentioned that all of this will be subject to review by an economist to try to assess how much sending and receiving -- how much receiving lands are necessary for those who want to send. We don't know that yet. We don't know, also, with some of the other transfer devices how this will fit in, and that's being looked at by the economist. But what the subcommittee would like is -- and, again, you may want to bring this up next month allowing for public input, but what Page 74 August�40i we did discuss was setting up some priority receiving lands. So this is in the proposal that's before you and on the map. The other area was in C -2, but it's in the upper corner. If you look at your map in C -2, it's the upper northeast corner. We want to consider changing that from what was designated as a receiving land to a sending land. That upper northeast corner has the same wetland wildlife and other qualities as the other sending lands. So we wanted to change that area from a receiving land to a sending land. Then the other portion of our report we would like to have you endorse are the areas where we've designated are priorities as far as receiving lands go. This is where we would like to see the direction, at least in first phase. I've tried to give you an introduction as to what sending and receiving are. I've tried to give you the proposal and the map. The rest of it is just background as to why we selected these sections as priority areas. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Discussion. MR. SOLING: I have a question. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. SOLING: Am I to understand you're talking about transferring building rights from one site to another? MS. SANTORO: Let's say that someone has land in a NRPA. MR. SOLING: Pardon me? MS. SANTORO: Let's say we have someone that owns land in a NRPA area, you know, where it's very less dense, and they want to develop it. We want to keep the density of population away from the natural resource areas and wetlands and so forth. So this device allows the person who owns that land to leave it from -- to not develop it, but also have the economic benefit by selling his right to someone in another area, in other words, into the receiving area so that that person can pay the one who's sending, keeping his land Page 75 Auglf],4URI undeveloped. The receiver pays for it and also gets a credit to allow higher density where the receiver land is. MR. SOLING: Which leads me to a question. What about zoning? Here we have a governmental organization laying out a zoning plan which takes into effect surrounding areas and says we will have a certain amount of density here as compared to a different density there. You're saying you're going to obfuscate this by transferring building rights. That sort of negates all of the zoning principles. MS. STUDENT: I think maybe I can address that and maybe Bill, too. I think the regime is going to be set up is that those areas will be identified, and no doubt as part of the study it will be looked at to make sure that they are compatible at those maximum densities that would be allowed with surrounding areas. There would also be language in the comp plan and much more detailed language in an ordinance that would spell it all out as to how it's going to work. So it would sort of like an overlay of what we already have in our zoning district. Is that an adequate explanation, Bill? MS. SANTORO: Can I just mention -- also, we're talking about the rural fringe right now, and this report will go back to the rural fringe subcommittee. What they're trying to do is to look at devices where we're going from very dense urban to not dense rural area and how in the middle -- how are we going to accommodate how we're going to have it mesh. So all of this is part of discussions as to this kind of middle area. MS. STUDENT: It's a transitional area between the lower and the higher. MR. LORENZ: We'll have to identify within those receiving areas what we would want to see as the maximum density so that we'll have a maximum density cap. We'll also have -- or at least I Page 76 August 7, 06I envision that we would have various performance or zoning standards that if someone wants to utilize a TDR program, that he's going to have to build according to these types of principles, where we start looking at the smart - growth new town village types of principles for him to be able to utilize those additional density units, such that we have a well - planned community at that point. From an Environmental Advisory Council's perspective where, for one thing, it's very important to get your input into the process, is to look at the sending areas as being those that are of high enough environmental sensitivity that we want to direct development away from and that the receiving areas that we've specified are truly those areas that do not have a lot of environmental sensitivity, and we're saying from an environmental perspective that it's okay to increase the density in those areas. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yes, sir. MR. CARLSON: I have a comment. For those who are looking at this map and trying to evaluate it, part of the logic was if you now have lands that are designated rural agricultural, zoned rural, very low density, and those become receiving areas, and they are contiguous with a NRPA, and those densities go way up, well, then you're putting a subdivision -- you're putting residential -- you're putting a suburban -type development next to an NRPA. A NRPA is a preserve area. Most of them are wetlands, very sensitive hydrology. Well, you're not going to put that kind of development up against a NRPA without requiring, you know, drainage. You're going to be infringing on wildlife habitat, existing low density where large animals can move around that won't go through those suburbs. And then as a land manager in a NRPA, I can tell you that NRPAs will continue to manage property and that includes the use of fire. So if you have your receiving area up against a NRPA, you're Page 77 16J1 August 7, Zooi inviting a residential community to move next door to a natural area that's going to be continued to be burned, and we know that doesn't work because of the problems with the affects of smoke on the residents. So, you know, it's just, basically, poor planning. We're going through all of this to plan properly, and right out of the box, in my opinion, you know, having a receiving area adjacent to a NRPA is just bad planning for a lot of reasons. So that's part of the justification for why the map looks like the way it does. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Bill. MR. LORENZ: Just one point in terms of the process and coordination. If the EAC were to accept this in terms of their subcommittee report, my intention will be to take the information, transfer it to the rural fringe advisory committee that meets tomorrow evening, and let them know that you have been -- that this is your current discussion. Then if you put it on your agenda for your September meeting and try to get some additional public input, then we're trying to broaden the base of the public input for these types of issues. I then will provide that feedback back to the rural fringe advisory committee at the same time staff will be working with the consultant. I notice that David Ellis must have left, but David Ellis was here for the wetland discussion. He's the current chair of the rural fringe advisory committee. I thought maybe he might want to say something as well. But that's the process to try to have staff coordinate the efforts of these two committees. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I was going to ask Miss Santoro, do we need to have a motion from the council now that you're back on this side? MS. SANTORO: I would like a motion. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Go ahead. Why don't you do that. MS. SANTORO: I would like to move that the Environmental Page 78 Augu� Advisory Council accepts this report. MS. LYNNE: I'll second it. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: And by accepting this report, it will be passed on to the rural fringe advisory committee; is that correct, Bill? MR. LORENZ: Correct. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: All right. It's been moved and seconded. All in favor? MS. LYNNE: Or some discussion. MR. HILL: Well, I think Ed fell short. It was, I think, at his initiative that we included the concept of a NRPA buffer relating to the comments he made, and I think that ought to be stressed in this report, perhaps even more so than the starred footnote or whatever we have on that page. I think that's a very, very important item, and I think it was at Ed's instigation that we included that.. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Now can we vote on this? All in favor of the motion? MS. SANTORO: Aye. MR. COE: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Aye. MR. CARLSON: Aye. MS. LYNNE: Aye. MR. HILL: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed? MR. SOLING: Opposed. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It passes 6 to 1. Okay. Do we have any comments from members of council? MR. COE: Nope. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Any comments from anybody in the public? MR. COE: Nope. Page 79 16J1 August 7, 2001 CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: We're adjourned. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 11:45 a.m. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL THOMAS W. SANSBURY, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY MARGARET A. SMITH, RPR Page 80 Septe101 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL Naples, Florida, September 5, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Environmental Advisory Council, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:05 a.m. In REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Thomas W. Sansbury Michael G. Coe William W. Hill Erica Lynne Alexandra "Allie" Santoro Alfred F. Gal, Jr. NOT PRESENT: Larry Stone Chester Soling Ed Carlson ALSO PRESENT: Patrick White, Asst. County Attorney Stephen Lenberger, Env. Specialist, Dev. Serv. Stan Chrzanowski, Senior EnginAc. C""' Date: Page 1 Item# Codes To: Septefi6r4, to I CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Why don't we call the September 5th meeting of the Environmental Advisory Council meeting -- to order, I should say. And we have six of us here which I believe is a quorum. Would someone like to call the roll. MR. LENBERGER: Carlson called in with an excused absence. Coe. MR. COE: Here. MR. LENBERGER: Stone. (No response.) MR. LENBERGER: Lynne. MS. LYNNE: Here. MR. LENBERGER: Gal. MR. GAL: Here. MR. LENBERGER: Soling. (No response.) MR. LENBERGER: Santoro. MS. SANTORO: Here. MR. LENBERGER: Sansbury. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Here. MR. LENBERGER: Hill. MR. HILL: Here. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Show that we have six folks. Okay. We have the agenda for the meeting in front of us. Are there any additions, deletions, revisions to that agenda? MR. LENBERGER: None. But Stan would like to discuss an item he handed out this morning. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. Chrzanowski. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: I was going to do it under new business. You want me to do it now? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: If you'd like to, go right ahead. MR. COE: We got to approve the minutes. Page 2 SepterAiiK9, 1O1 CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Why don't we approve the minutes real quickly, and then we'll take a look at that. MR. HILL: Move to approve. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Moved by Mr. Hill. MR. COE: Second. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Second by Mr. Coe. In favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing none, passed unanimously. Now Mr. Chrzanowski. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: Good morning. I'm Stan Chrzanowski with development services engineering department. And the item I handed out is a rewrite of the county's excavation ordinance, which is Section 3.5 of the Land Development Code. Over the last many months, this item has been looked at by every department in the county that has any concern about these type of items, like transportation, utilities, stormwater management. They all received copies. They all made comments. It has been reviewed by the Development Services Advisory Committee Subcommittee. I think it's being looked at by the DSAC later this week. It's going to be looked at by the Collier County Planning Commission and then eventually by the Board of County Commissioners. I've given you a copy today so that you can have a month to review it prior to the next meeting. If you have any questions, you can bring them up then. I attached my card with my e -mail address to each one so that if there's a question that you have that you think I might be able to answer via e -mail, you can e -mail me, and I'll do it that way. And then I can -- legally I think I can forward it to everybody else that we're making this change for this following Page 3 Septlb�r`S, X001 reason; or I'll tell you why I don't want to make the change, and then you can bring it up at the next meeting. That might save a little time that way. By way of reminder real quickly, if you look at the map of Golden Gate Estates -- and a lot of this rewrite was prompted by what's going on in Golden Gate. Up in the northeast corner of Golden Gate up here, this is Ed Carlson's Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary up in there. This is an area known as Big Corkscrew Island. It's -- the pink marks are every excavation we've permitted out there. It's all deep sand. We don't allow blasting in the Estates. You don't have to blast in deep sand. You can just dig. The water table is the groundwater table. It's the table in the canals. It's the table in the lakes. It just follows the water table up and down. It comes up in the summertime within a foot or two of the ground. It drops down 6 feet in the wintertime. That -- most of the excavations that we've permitted out there, almost all of them, are up in that area and for that reason; it's a very good sand. That is what prompted this rewrite. But the last time the ordinance was rewritten was a long time ago, and you'll see a lot of housekeeping in that rewrite. The deletions are all struck through, and the additions are all underlined, so it should be pretty clear as to what we did. And come next month you can question me about anything you think that you don't agree with that I've already told you I agree with. Any questions? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Questions? We will agenda this for next month's meeting to review. MR. CHRZANOWSKI: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, ma'am. We do have a question, Stan. MS. LYNNE: Does this apply only to Golden Gate Estates? MR. CHRZANOWSKI: No. This is every excavation in Collier Page 4 Septe164 10 1 County. And you'll see we have different types of excavations, and before you ask, the reason for so many types of excavations is there is some intention on making the way we collect fees or -- assess and collect fees a little more equitable than it is now, and this was done with an eye toward that. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Thank you very much, sir. Okay. Land use petitions. MR. LENBERGER: Good morning. For the record, Stephen Lenberger, development services, planning services department. The petition in front of you is for a special treatment permit to allow for a single- family home site on Keewaydin Island. The petition was brought to you last month, and the petitioner is requesting a site alteration slightly over 13 percent of the site. As I mentioned during the last meeting, the Land Development Code allows for administrative approval of single- family home sites on ST -zoned land up to 10 percent site alteration. At the last meeting, you requested to see a revegetation plan. If you remember correctly, staff requested that petitioner revegetate about -- let me look at my notes. Excuse me -- that the petitioner replant about 6,000 square feet of native vegetation on site, basically double the area exceeding the 10 percent site alteration allowed by administrative approval. You had wanted to see site -- a revegetation plan. We had sent that out to you. And I am here and the petitioner is here to answer any questions you may have regarding the proposal. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Questions for Mr. McVicker? Questions for staff from the council? Yes, ma'am. MS. LYNNE: Could one of you tell me what experts were consulted in providing this plan, developing this plan? MR. McVICKER: For the record, Jack McVicker -- Henry John McVicker. Excuse me. I worked with two consultants on this. One was Dwight Oakley, who is a local architect but also has experience Page 5 SeptelbOY, X001 in landscaping, familiar with Keewaydin Island and native plant species; Michael Scheller (phonetic), who is owner of Franciscan Gardens Landscaping here in town; also Jerry Robinson, who works on Keewaydin Island extensively and -- as a landscaper, and he worked with us as well on that. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Any other comments? Yes, ma'am. Go ahead. MS. LYNNE: Which of these people has expertise on the biology of an offshore island? MR. McVICKER: I couldn't tell you what their biology expertise is, but they all have experience in planting in coastal areas. We used some reference materials as well. There are a couple books. I shared one with Stephen Lenberger that we used as a guide. I did not review their credentials extensively, but I felt assured, through some of the work that they had done previously, that they were qualified to make recommendations. MS. LYNNE: What was the book? MR. McVICKER: Excuse me. I'll bring it up to you, but it's called Landscaping for Florida Wildlife, Recreative -- or Recreating Native Ecosystems and Your Yard. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Any other questions for Mr. McVicker or for staff? I -- you know, I look at this, and we've done -- not on Keewaydin but in a lot of other areas, and I think he's done a very nice job on this, over and above. MR. COE: I'd like to make a motion to approve. MS. SANTORO: Second. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Motion by Mr. Coe, second by Ms. Santoro. Any discussion? Yes, sir, Mr. Hill. MR. HILL: One question. One item that was discussed last month, and that's the location of the septic tank on that, quote, Marco Boulevard, unquote, right -of -way. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: light on top of it. Septe161 �,101 Bill, they're going to put a traffic MR. HILL: I know that road probably won't be developed, but is it necessary to put that tank right in that right -of -way? MR. McVICKER: No, it is not. That was chosen because that's a vacant piece of land that was reasonably close to the house. That could be moved. I can tell you that we're going to file for a vacation of that right -of -way, along with some other landowners down in the adjacent area, to try to get that formally vacated. But at the time that the plans are submitted for construction, we certainly will put that wherever the county requires us to. It does not need to be there, no. MR. HILL: It's not an environmental issue, but I'm sure the Planning Commission will be interested in something like that. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Any further discussion? Any input from the public? Hearing none, all those in favor of approving the -- excuse me? MR. COE: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: You got to wait until I ask for the vote -- in favor of the petition? MR. COE: Aye. MS. SANTORO: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Aye. MR. HILL: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed? MS. LYNNE: Aye. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Passed 5 -1. Thank you very much. MR. McVICKER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Old business. Do we have any old business? We've already discussed new business. No other new business? MR. LENBERGER: No new business. No old business. Page 7 1-.6Jj S eptemer , 01 CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Who would like to give the growth management update? MS. SANTORO: I will. You received our minutes in the mail. It's up to the council as to whether they would like to make a formal motion. Basically we were addressing the habitat section in the rural fringe assessment reports. And there was some dissension, but not with our committee. There are two things that I would like to impress upon you, that we looked at the staff s proposal. And the staff s proposal had, one, a site preservation requirement so that if it needed to be restored and there was a native vegetation, this would be under this standard. And the second was a native vegetation standard where there's already existing strategic habitat, that that would be looked at as well. So the staff recommended using these two criteria with the percentages and to come up with the amount of acreage to be preserved or saved, and the greater of those would prevail. Now, there was some conflict with other committees. They did not want the site preservation requirement, and I'd like to see if the EAC would like to promote that, the two standards. The second thing were (sic) the percentages, and we concurred with staff s higher percentages. Basically what staff did was take the strategic habitat percentages within each of the areas, A, B, C -1, C -2, D. and the NRPAs and use those percentages saying that, for instance, if 90 percent has native vegetation, then preserving 90 percent overall in that area would concur. So I would -- the committee reinforced using both criteria, the site vegetation and the native vegetation standards, and also concurred with staff s higher percentages in each of those sections, A, B, C -1, C -21 D, and the NRPA. So it's up to EAC if they would like to also promote that, but that was the subcommittee's feeling. MR. LORENZ: For the record, Bill Lorenz, natural resources SeptelbOY 1O1 director. Just to let the EAC know that as a result of hiring Jim Nicholas (phonetic), our economist, to look at the transfer of development rights program, TDRs, we are looking at coming up with a different alternative for calculating the preservation standards for different areas. Let me -- let me modify that statement a little bit. We are looking at -- at changing the areas for which we're going to be making the calculations for the preservation standards, because what we've realized as Dr. Nicholas has come on board is that we're starting to craft the sending zones for TDR programs, and sending zones are those environmentally sensitive areas that we want to send development rights out of. So we want to send them to what we call receiving areas. The receiving areas are those areas that do not have a lot of environmental sensitivity, and those receiving areas, for instance, are Areas A and D, for instance. There are portions of Area C. I think we've shared that map with you at your last meeting. So instead of coming up with -- with preservation standards for Areas A, B, C, D, what we're looking at is recalculating the numbers based upon sending areas and receiving areas. So staff has committed to doing that because we feel that that will fit well with the proposed transfer of development rights program if it is determined by the economist to be viable and marketable in Collier County. We would be applying the same methodology that Allie had mentioned to you earlier, that we would be looking at -- still we'd be looking at for the receiving areas, for instance, a site preservation standard based upon total project site. In addition, we'd be looking at a native vegetation retention standard based upon the amount of vegetation there and the proportion of vegetation on an average condition that has been identified as strategic habitat. Again, we'd be kind of shooting at that 90 percent level for retention. •,_. . 6 Septem er )01 So we will still be applying those same procedures on the sending and receiving areas as opposed to simply the areas that we identified earlier as A, B, C, and D. So I just want to let you know that we're still going to be making recalculations here and that it may be premature for the EAC to take a position right now until you see how those other calculations come up. The effect of those calculations, we think, is going to be that the receiving areas are going to be more -- have the same characteristics because we've identified them as being not environmentally sensitive based upon a whole host of parameters that we've looked at. So we'd like to think that when we make those calculations that we'll get areas that are going to have smaller site preservation standards and smaller habitat preservation standards because there's not a lot of habitat in those particular areas the way we now have drawn them. On the other hand, the environmentally sensitive areas, which are going to be the sending areas, will have very high preservation standards because we have now aggregated those areas to the degree that they are highly environmentally sensitive. They have a lot of habitat in those areas. So we will see a difference between the sending and receiving areas. The advantage of this is that -- is that we won't have a lot of different standards for different areas. The areas will be -- have identified as boundaries more along the lines of the environmental future as opposed to right now when we've identified Areas A, B, C, and D, and we've broken them up. Those were an initial disaggregation of the areas based upon some topographic type of features, a road here splitting the area, certain other locations. So we think that this next set of calculations is going to get closer to a better preservation process. So I just need to let you know that we're in the act -- action right now of re -- of making those recalculations. Page 10 Septelbo�J, 1O1 CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Any questions? Yes, sir. MR. COE: Have buffer zones been addressed yet? MR. LORENZ: They were addressed in the conceptual plan just very briefly. We will be -- I have a staff working graph now that I've circulated among all the internal staff and some of our consultants for a set of buffer policies that I hope to release September 12th. The Rural Fringe Advisory Committee, their next meeting is September 12th. I expect to put that in their hands at that date. They are to review those at their next meeting on -- I believe it's September 26th. That should be a Wednesday. So on the 12th when I release those policies, I can release -- I can -- I'll provide a copy to the -- all the EAC members, because these will be the -- these will be the -- the working drafts for which we will have actual amendments and -- language and amendments to the current Comprehensive Plan. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Any other questions for Bill? MS. SANTORO: No. It sounds like you're going to use some of the same standards, but the percentages in the areas may change. So I think what you're saying is you'd like a response at some later date on more specifics? MR. LORENZ: I think there are -- yes. The answer's yes. But there are two issues that -- in terms of developing the methodology, and you touched on them. And one is whether or not to have a dual standard, that is a standard that's based upon a set -aside on total project size, in which case, for instance, you may have a hundred - acre site that's completely farm fields, and we will have -- for instance, at 25 percent preservation on that site, you'll have to set aside 25 percent of a denuded farm field as a preserve area, establish it, take -- clear the exotics, and have it be restored into a preserve area. That's the effect of having that kind of standard. The other standard would be -- of course, is the vegetation Page 11 1641 September , 01 retention standard that -- and this is where it works, for instance, on -- if you have a hundred -acre site and it's a hundred percent vegetated, then the retention standard is going to be higher to be able to capture a lot more vegetation than would simply be able to be captured if you had the 25 percent site preservation standard. So it's a little bit of a -- it's somewhat of a -- it's a little bit of a safety net on -- and you use the higher number. But that's the effect of having the dual standard, and that's -- that is an issue. MR. COE: Why have a dual standard? If a guy's got, say, a hundred acres of farmland that was originally vegetated with whatever was out there, another guy's got a hundred acres of untouched trees, bushes, what have you, why have a different standard? Land is land. Why not have them both go to the 40 percent, for example? MR. LORENZ: I think it's the recognition of existing conditions of what's there now. If we have -- we can -- we can craft the standard -- excuse me. Our methodology is still trying to shoot for a 90 percent preservation of habitat within the whole fringe area, but that's based on averages, because we know that we have some sites that are a hundred percent denuded; some sites are a hundred percent vegetated. So when we try to apply the average condition to all the sites, we know that we're going to have some sites that are going to be higher or lower. So that's why we developed the dual standard. The site -- the preservation -- site preservation standard allows us to at least bring it up to a point where it would be restorative in the case where it's denuded, and the vegetation retention standard ensures that we don't take out too much vegetation on the site because we'd be applying that lower site preservation standard to it. So because we're developing the numbers on averages, that's why we determined that we needed to have the dual standard. MR. COE: Totally confused me. I still say 40 percent is 40 Page 12 SepteILY4, 101 percent, for whatever you got. I mean, it's, like, you got a fort, and I got a fort. What's the difference? MR. LORENZ: Well, you're -- but we don't have that. We -- you're analogizing the fort to land. What I'm saying is that -- I'm saying that each site is different based upon the amount of vegetation that is present on the site. MR. COE: Okay. I see that. But if the goal is to preserve, on one hand, what's already there and the other one is to bring the land back to a natural standard, why not bring them both up to 40 percent? That's -- I'm just -- MR. LORENZ: I'll give you an example. When you look at the numbers, in one of the areas we had the preservation standard worked out to be 35 or 40 percent, but the vegetation standard worked out to be 60 percent. So in that particular case, if you wanted -- if you have a hundred percent vegetation, if you applied a -- let's say if you took the average in that particular situation, you'd still be losing more vegetation on that site because it's a hundred percent vegetated. MR. COE: I see what you mean. Yeah. MR. LORENZ: So, I mean, it's kind of like one of those -- it causes some complexity in the regulations when you try to account for it. You know, I mean, there's the old adage of keep it simple. But, you know -- MR. COE: But, you know, when you throw in the buffer also into that -- I know one of the things that I have real problems with with any projects that come before us is this 25 percent preservation is all stuck on the buffer. We strip down everything in the middle, and we have this little 15 -yard buffer around commercial property, whatever it may be. So how that 25 percent is applied is very important and whether it's going to relate to the property that's next to it. MR. LORENZ: Let me modify my statement in terms of the Page 13 6 Septem er 1 buffering policies. The buffering policies that we're developing now are policies that will provide buffers or buffer language to large conservation or preserved areas, such as -- let's say if we have a project in the rural fringe that may be adjacent to the CREW project, the buffer language that we're developing now will be applied to projects that are adjacent to conservation lands. At the moment we're not developing the language that deals with individual projects that -- that are set aside. We will have some language later on that will deal with that. On the wetlands -- for instance, on the wetlands protection, we do specify -- the policy language that we've currently drafted, we've specified a 50 -foot buffer which I think is consistent with what the water management district provides but -- MR. COE: It's been my experience on this board that when we talk about the 25 percent vegetation to be on the land, that the developers almost invariably take and that 25 percent is in a buffer around the -- which is -- it's -- environmentally it appears to be almost worthless. As a matter of fact you remember the one project where the guy wanted to put all the turtles in the -- in that one little buffer that was, like, 15, 20 yards, something like that. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Tortoises. MR. COE: Yeah. Turtles, tortoises, they're all the same thing. MR. LORENZ: We are developing, just to let you know, a different set of standards that will be applied to the urban area and a different set of standards that will be applied to the rural fringe area. At the moment standards that we are proposing within the rural -- within the urban area basically are not that much different from our existing code. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Satisfied? MR. COE: Yeah. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Good. Any other questions Page 14 Septel", 101 for Bill? Yes, ma'am. MS. LYNNE: I just have a comment about the -- in terms of biological and ecological value, the value of land that currently has native vegetation on it is higher than land that is farmland. And, to me, that would be the ecological value in requiring 90 percent of that to be preserved and less of the farmland to be preserved because, at least so far, our effort toward reestablishment is uncertain. So something that's already there is more valuable, so that would be my comment on that. My other concern with this is the buffer areas. If we're transferring development rights from one area to another, there's the potential for having a big development right next to natural areas, and that's not going to be good for the natural areas. MR. LORENZ: When we begin crafting the language for the receiving areas -- that's where we'd be talking about dumping additional density, in those receiving areas -- we will be developing specific language of how that can be clustered. In utilizing those TDRs to increase their densities, we will provide language to ensure that there's going to be as -- or minimize the impact to any conservation lands that perhaps that receiving area abuts because it will abut some type of conservation land or at least a sending area, which is environmentally sensitive lands. So when we craft those regulations for how you can utilize your TDRs to increase your density in a clustered development, we will address that concern. At the moment the pol -- the buffer language that we're working on now is base -- is more -- is more general than that and simply provides guidelines and criteria for what you can and can't do when you have a development adjacent to a conservation land, but it's not -- it doesn't have any additional requirements that would be developed through the TDR program. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Very good. Any other questions Page 15 Septe#hb�r`S, 2001 for Mr. Lorenz? Hearing none -- MR. LORENZ: I would like to add one thing, and it just came UP in terms of the -- I believe the -- I'm not sure whether it got in your packet or not. The letter from the rural fringe chairman, David Ellis, did everybody see that, a copy of that? Perhaps the chair may want to read it or at least pass it through. That -- this dealt with the EAC's recommendation to look at a modification of the sending and receiving areas. And the rural fringe committee heard the -- at least I provided the Rural Fringe Advisory Committee the EAC's position paper. They -- they felt that the EAC needs to provide them some more information, some more -- some more study of that issue and would like to have a representative attend one of their meetings or at least try to develop some type of working relationship with -- with the EAC. You may want to consider that. I know in the past that EAC members have attended the Rural Fringe Committee's meetings. We are now getting down to a point where we're starting to discuss language. And the intent, also, in the total scheme of the schedule is to have the EAC provide a review -- a final review and recommendations in January, mid- to late January 2002. So everything is starting to move quickly. One thing I would like to just ask the EAC is to start to be -- thinking flexible of holding some special workshops because as we develop the schedule and bring it to the Rural Fringe Advisory Committee, we're on their schedule, and we may not have the opportunity to run the language by you initially. So there's going to have to be some -- maybe some joint review or some mechanism to be established to help provide that committee some degree of input. But I'm not sure whether you can always take -- have a formal position through the EAC simply because of the way that the schedule and materials go out to the Rural Fringe Advisory Page 16 SeptelLYY210 1 Committee. But I will be providing the EAC with all of the drafts from now on of all the material that we're developing language on, so you will get the same package that the advisory committee is getting, so that hopefully will help expedite your review and deliberations when we come to you for your final positions in January. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I know Ms. Santoro has talked to Mr. Ellis. What's the feeling? Should we have one of our own attend a rural fringe meeting? MS. SANTORO: I would be glad to, but they have it at four to six, and that's my problem. After work I'd be happy to, but I can't go at four. MR. COE: What time could you go, Allie? MS. SANTORO: I get out at 5:00, and then with traffic, probably 5:15. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Would anyone else like to attend, since Ms. Santoro -- timewise she can't do it? MR. COE: I can't do it either. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: How about Mr. Hill? MR. HILL: I put it down for the 12th at four o'clock. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you. MR. LORENZ: I just put on the screen here, just to show you that their -- they've calendared their meetings. September will be the 12th and 26th. October will be the 3rd, 10th, and 24th. November will be the 7th5 14th, and 28th, and December will be the 5th and the 12th. And it's a recognition that they may have to add some additional meeting times in there, so at this point it's very, very ambitious. It's a lot of work and a lot of material that's going to be developed between now and the end of the year. The current schedule is to bring it to the Board of County Commissioners, the transmittal hearing in February, so that's why we Page 17 Septelo �10 1 wanted to have the EAC meeting sometime in January. And it's going to have to be some special meetings that you will have to hold. We're just not going to be able to get all of this through in a couple of hours. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Could we add -- could you ask Barbara to add a regular agenda item under growth management subcommittee that Bill's going to attend just for a short report every month of what happens at the rural fringe meetings, just a report on rural fringe attendance or whatever we want to call it. MR. HILL: Is there any particular item that the council would like me to take to the fringe committee on the 12th? MS. LYNNE: Yeah. I think the buffer issue is a big one. MR. HILL: They have in their possession our TDR, which included a semi - recommendation that a mild buffer be used for NRPAs based on drawdown -- water table drawdown, so they know we're talking about severe buffer restrictions. MR. LORENZ: That's correct. That report was provided to them. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Anything else for Mr. Lorenz? Hearing none, any comments from the councilmembers? MR. HILL: Since that's -- let me ask the council to review that report that's in your hand on the TDR that came before us last month. Make sure you review that and let me know before the 12th if there's anything in particular you want to emphasize or disagree with on that. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. We'll do. Very good. Mr. White is with us, has been with us for a month or so. And I just wondered -- I haven't heard anything on the status lately, Mr. White, but where's the old hearing examiner question and procedure and everything presently? MR. WHITE: Assistant County Attorney Patrick White. To the Page 18 Septe H 1O1 best of my understanding, we're at the place where some of the LDC amendments that are being brought forth in this cycle are precursors, if you will, or requirements that the Board of County Commissioners had asked the staff to bring to them for their review and consideration, in particular the public participation plan. And pending the satisfactory approval of that by the board, I believe that that's one of the central elements that need to be met before the board will go ahead and take a look at bringing into effect the hearing examiner provisions. As far as the more administrative and managerial aspects of that, I'd have to defer to staff, in particular, perhaps, Administrator Dunnuck on that. And I don't have any information other than they're working actively on this particular special cycle of the LDC amendment and have discussed to some degree, I'm not sure what, what they're going to do with respect to the actual process for solicitation and review of potential applicants. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Do you know if staff plans to bring the -- you know, the actual -- what was the term you used, Mr. White -- how it's going to work and how the input's going to be and so forth before the EAC just for their input before it goes to the commission, regarding the hearing examiner? MR. LENBERGER: I believe that was -- next agenda will have the proposed LDC amendments that are in the current cycle. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Set it next time? All right. Any other comments? You know, this is one meeting I was hoping was going to run long because I have a dentist's appointment, and unfortunately I'm going to make it. Come on up, sir. Yes, sir. MR. CORNELL: I'm Brad Cornell, and I'm representing Collier County Audubon Society. And I just wanted to compliment and Page 19 SepteiLYS' 2601 applaud you as an advisory board for taking a look at and reviewing the rural assessment that's going on. I know that there are two advisory committees already seated that are looking at this by name in their mission, but as a -- as a growth management policy advisory council yourselves, this is very, very appropriate. And I want to applaud you very much for doing that and encourage you to continue that. I know that we, in the public, and the committees themselves can really use the information that you provide them and your opinions, so please continue what you're doing with that. I also wanted to support what staff is saying about focusing on sending areas. Really, our sending areas in the rural parts of the county are big systems that -- they're -- that's what we want to protect. So in whatever way we can leverage the values that exist throughout the rural area and focus the protections on these large systems, like Camp Key (phonetic) Strand and OK Slough, our NRPAs, and the other public lands and projects like CREW, we need to do whatever we can for those. That means the largest buffers for those. If that means that we're sacrificing some of the receiving areas, unfortunately that is going to have to be part of the trade -off in the long run, but we need to find ways to do that. And I also want to encourage you -- you mentioned that you want -- you're going to send Mr. Hill to the rural fringe. I want to encourage you also to take a look at what the Rural Lands Committee is doing because they, likewise, are accelerating their meeting schedule. In October staff and the consultants have laid out a schedule to start examining land use scenarios, which is essentially proposals. They will be proposals to look at, what are we going to do with all the data that has been gathered around -- in the Immokalee area study? How are we going to put that on the map? What are we going to protect? How is agriculture going to fit into this picture? And I Page 20 Septe1l6JJL01 would encourage you to keep close tabs and provide input on these land use scenarios that come forward from that committee. Keep up the good work. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you, Mr. Cornell. MR. LORENZ: Yes. Brad made a good point, and I apologize for not briefing you on the Rural Lands Committee as well, but they will be meeting at 5:30 on September 17th -- that's a Monday -- out at -- I believe they're still going to be out at OrangeTree, the middle school there out at OrangeTree. MR. CORNELL: Corkscrew Middle School. MR. LORENZ: Corkscrew Middle School. That's their -- that's their advisory committee meeting. Then on September 26th, the Board of County Commissioners will be hearing a presentation on the rural -- on the progress of the Rural Lands Committee. So they will have -- they will be conducting a workshop from 9 -- probably from 9 to 12 on September 26th in their -- here in their chambers. And they will then hear an update of where that -- that effort is going and the information that has been gathered to date there. So you may want to just put it on your schedule there to either attend or watch it on -- it'll be on Channel 54, I'm sure. MR. HILL: Would you put both committees' schedule and appropriate board schedule and send it to us? MR. LORENZ: Yes. MR. HILL: I didn't get all those dates down. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Any further public comment? Hearing none, we are adjourned. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 9:47 a.m. Page 21 Septelb�J, X901 ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD THOMAS W. SANSBURY, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY BARBARA DRESCHER, NOTARY PUBLIC Page 22 I. II 1 -75 /Golden Gate Interchange Advisory Committee Transportation Operations Department 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 3410 August 30, 2001 Fiala Carter 1 Hennl j: M RL ac'Kle Colette 203 "U ..,'` The meeting was called to order at 10:00 AM by Al Moore. Attendance: A. The City of Naples: the honorable Bonnie R. Mackenzie, Mayor; honorable Gary Galleberg. B. Golden Gate Civic Association: Glenn E. Wilt; Bill H. Poteet, Jr. C. Unincorporated Collier County: Al Moore; Thomas A. Collins II; Mark B. Morton. D. Collier County: Edward J. Kant, PE, Transportation Operations Director; Pamela J. Lulich, ASLA, Landscape Operations Manager; Bob Petersen, Landscape Operations; Nancy Siemion, ASLA, Landscape Architect; Amy Taylor, Principal Planner. E. FDOT: Bryan Dennis, District 1 Landscape Liaison; Sarah Clarke, SWAO Project Manager; Johnny Limbaugh. F. Other: Gene Lozano, Carter & Burgess; Norman J. Trebilcock, RWA Project Coordinator; Sharon Rice, McGee and Associates, FDOT Landscape Architect Consultants; A. Gail Boorman, Landscape Architects; Rev. William Gianola; Allen Jost, Manpower Secretarial Services. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Bonnie MacKenzie made a motion that the reading of the minutes of the August 9, 2001 meeting will be dispensed with and they be approved. Seconded by Bill Poteet. Carried unanimously. IV. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: Pam Lulich presented each member with a copy of a report covering each of the areas listed below and went on to explain it in detail and answer questions that were brought up. A copy of this report dated August 20, 2001 is made a part of the minutes and attached herewith. A. Blown Up Map: A large 11 x 17 inch fold out map in color with a legend was the first part of this report. The landscape areas are in green, the pond or wet areas are in blue and will be 4 to 6 feet in depth. Dry ponds are in beige and will be one foot in depth. Misc. Corres: Date: s-1- -- Item# I Le 3 1 Codes To: 16J1 B. Costs of Landscaping: On the two pages following the map, the areas of proposed landscape are broken into ramp areas with acreage and square footage which can be used later in our estimates. She stated it was difficult to put a square footage price on just the ramp area because it is designed for 75 MPH traffic and the median landscape design is based on a 45 mph speed limit. The next item she presented was a look at the improved corridor /medians in regard to their cost to construct. Three existing areas were presented with pictures and prices to give the committee some idea to base a decision on. Those areas were Golden Gate Parkway /Airport- Goodlette; Golden Gate Parkway /Santa Barbara to 951; and the landscaping of Collier Blvd/951. Each page in addition to pictures has a description of the type plantings, total area, costs per square foot, and the total cost of the project. Each corridor included a summary page of the Installed Median Beautification Corridors. This page then can be used to compare to the Proposed Segments page. The proposed segments page took each segment of Golden Gate Parkway, within the project area, and did an approximation of cost based the styles presented in each of the three existing projects. The costs were compared based on linear miles or square footage of improvements. (See attachment). Pam went on to state that this did not include the landscaping of the ramps or the frontage roads. She did however present the Landscaping Costs of Western Beltway which included costs of landscaping on ramps based on similar design speeds. Bryan Dennis explained the Western Beltway costs were based on the hard costs of landscaping projects in Orange County for the Orlando /Orange County Expressway Authority. He stated that a lot of the work and cost estimates would be typical to what the Golden Gate Project would be with ramp plazas and overpasses. This would give the committee some idea of what their costs would be using a Type B landscape theme (A "Type B" landscaping was defined and referenced in the "Visual Assessment of Interchanges" handout presented in the first meeting). Pam said that there are five ramps on the blowup plan that need to be included. Bryan Dennis stated that each of these ramps would be about $90,000 each, which would not include irrigation. The costs did include a one year maintenance which is about 20% of the budget since the plant contractors require some assurance of maintenance in order to provide their one year guarantee. Ed Kant brought up the various methods of irrigation, which include potable water, reclaimed water, wells and a combination of any of these. When there is a need to augment by irrigation it can be a very costly thing. The original outlay of capital becomes insignificant when comparing to the subsequent costs of maintenance. Maintenance costs can run 10 to 20 times the original capital outlay over a period of 20 years. The largest component of maintenance is the cost of water. To keep the costs low we would probably go to wells but the water may need treatment before applying. IQ 16J1 Reclaimed water is not always available in Collier County at this time therefore we do not recommend it. As a last resort we use potable water but it is about 8 times as expensive. Tom Collins asked if Collier County typically purchases the one year guaranties and whether the committee should even be concerned with this aspect. Ed Kant went on to explain the various ways of approaching the aspect of determining whether the longer guarantee should be sought or not. It appeared that since Collier County is set up to do landscape maintenance and the supplier normally will warrant the plantings for 90 days it could be more cost effective to not go for the one year guarantee. Many other variables would have to be taken into consideration before the committee should make such a decision though. As a rule of thumb, you can take a million dollar cost of landscaping and expect to spend 15 to 20 million in maintenance costs over the next 20 years. Therefore the initial investment should not be the primary thing that is looked at when considering what type of landscaping should be considered. Most of the maintenance is labor intensive and very little of it can be done by machine. The fancier it is, the more maintenance is required. Gary Galloway suggested that we lean toward a xeriscape approach to reduce the cost of maintenance. Bill Poteet asked if we had potable water at the site. It was thought that there was but it should be put at the bottom of the list of alternatives because of the cost. It was later brought up that the potable water that is there is the raw water from the City of Naples to which the Mayor said this would not be an option to use. The thought of taking irrigation water from the canal came up however taking water from there is not always possible during seasons where the water level is low and subject to chemical treatment which would be injurious to the plant material. Wells are also an alternative but also may need treatment before it can be used. Mark Morton commented that since this is a rural residential area it might be best to consider more native plantings such as used by FDOT along the freeways and that would help to make it more of a xeriscape planting. He went on to move that the committee focus upon that type of planting. The numbers are surprisingly high to do the nice stuff like Golden Gate where it cost $600,000. Bill Poteet said that although he agreed with the concept, the motion was maybe a little premature since there has not been sufficient investigation into the various options that the committee may desire down the road and to pass it at this time would close the doors to some of those possibilities. Glen Wilt suggested that we should Blue Sky it and then see where the cost is. Then approach it by cutting back to meet the levels of money available. The general consensus is that they should lean toward plants that use less water but still can be attractive. The motion died for lack of a second. Pam Lulich stated that the County Landscape Operations implements the seven xeriscape principles presently. C. Cost to Landscape Lake: Pam Lulich said that there are 4 wet ponds and 3 dry ponds in the plan. The excavated dirt taken to create the pond is used 16J1 for fill material on the roadway. The lake profile proposes a 4:1 slope. For littoral plantings, a gentler 10:1 slope is preferred for aquatic plantings. Collier County requires 10 percent of the shoreline to be planted with littoral aquatic plant material however she thought the percentage could higher than that to be lusher. Santa Barbara Boulevard has a similar pond that was done in -house at a cost of $4,000. Something that would have to be taken into consideration is the fact that the water level fluctuates from 4 to 5 feet. The dry ponds only run about a foot in depth and it is proposed to have only sod around the edge with a maintenance strip around the edge. With native cypress as the planting it could be very attractive. Complete details can be found in the Aquascaping section of the attachments to the minutes. D. Cost of Concrete Finish and Decorative Rails: Because there is a pedestrian sidewalk on the bridge, a railing is required. The FDOT Plan also proposes a chain link pedestrian cage. Details are in the Propose Railing Section of the attachments to the minutes. Bonnie MacKenzie thought that putting a pedestrian cage over a bridge in a residential area is not a topic for conversation. The look and the message it sends it absolutely horrible. Ed Kant discussed pricing of chainlink fencing and thought the committee might want to address some inquiry to the FDOT as to how they might accomplish the same purpose without using chainlink with something more aesthetically pleasing. Gary Galleberg questioned the need for a walkway across the bridge. Ed Kant said that there is an epiphany of calls to the county because of the lack of attention to this type of facility. Many people are bicycling and using the pathways and walkways than ever thought. Glenn Wilt said he thought that some kind of covering is mandated by FDOT. He asked the county representative to follow up and see what requirements are necessary. He thought there must be some other type of barrier to keep things from being thrown from the bridge that would be more eye pleasing. Tom Collins agreed and asked the DOT to look further into this issue. Mark Morton said he would like to see some type of protection. He said that it is nice to have nothing there when walking or riding a bicycle but when driving on the freeway it is a good feeling to know that you can approach the bridge without the fear of having something thrown over the side. Al Moore asked that it be reiterated that this is in a residential area and that is a consideration for not having something ugly. Tom Collins asked that FDOT be asked if it could be arranged to have the walkway on only one side of the bridge. Pam Lulich continued on with the explanation of costs per linear foot of various examples of bridges, which are pictured in the prepared packet that is attached and made a part of the minutes. E. Decorative Lighting: Pam Lulich presented some possibilities if the committee decides that it wants decorative lighting. She presented a packet with pictures of typical lighting associated with the Golden Gate area which is attached as part of the minutes. Sarah Clarke described the standard lighting that is being furnished with the project by FDOT. The 4 16J1 committee could then better see what additional things they could do if they desired to adopt a decorative style. F. Point of Clarification: Pam Lulich asked Sarah Clark, FDOT, for clarification of the fact that the Carter & Burgess plan shows a rural profile for frontage backroads with a swale for drainage and no curb. When a curb and gutter is put in, that changes the complexity of the drawings. Collier County Landscape Operations normally use a Type F curb on the center medians however FDOT plans show Type E, mountable curb on Golden Gate Parkway. The Type E curb is 51/2" in height and the Type F curb is 6" in height and generally the Type F is considered safer for vehicles. FDOT stated they would review the choice of curb type. She also asked if the same clearance applied to both types of curbing. The FDOT answer is yes, the same horizontal clearance requirements apply regardless of type of curbing; trees can be planted 4' from the back of curb (whether Type E or Type F) on the outside of the roadway and 6' back of curb in the medians. Pam also asked about curb and gutter profiles on the frontage road. The frontage roads are currently shown with a rural typical section (no curb). In this case, the higher clearance distance applies (16' setbacks for tree plantings which is based on the design speed). FDOT is looking into designing the frontage roads with curb and gutter; this will reduce the horizontal clearance requirement to 4' from the back of curb. The curb and gutter profile will greatly influence the cost. of our landscaping. Glenn Wilt suggested that since Type F gives more protection we should push to get this included in the plan. Sarah Clarke also said that they were looking into moving various underground utilities and depending on their placement it could inhibit where trees will be planted. She said there would be more information from the Utilities in a couple of months. Ed Kant suggested that FDOT go back and re- examine the issue of curbing and utility problems so that in the next meeting or the following one we could get answers. There are very many more utilities now being used that come into consideration. (See package provided Landscape Operations which includes a summary sheet, typical sections of Golden Gate Parkway and Collier Blvd /951). V. OLD BUSINESS: A. Detail Report of Budget From FDOT: Berm vs. Wall — the discussion was regarding using a berm rather than a wall if a wall is required. Ed Kant presented a letter from Florida Department of Transportation signed by Michael G. Rippe a copy of which is made a part of the minutes. This showed a breakdown of the $874,000 that was in question at the last meeting. Bonnie MacKenzie questioned that she didn't see an allocation for the concrete formwork for the noise wall and bridge. It would have to come out of one of the seven items listed in the letter or be in addition to what is shown there. Ed Kant thought that the FDOT was going to consider including that cost in the construction of the wall, if needed, and the bridge. Gary Gallenberg asked if the money was locked into the seven 5 16J1 pockets shown or if it could be shifted around. Sarah Clarke stated that the money was not locked in to those categories and could be shifted. As an example, if it was determined that the noise wall was not needed, that $80,000 could be shifted to another purpose and would not be lost to the interchange. Al Moore asked if the cost of constructing the noise wall could also be moved into this fund if it was determined not to be necessary. Sarah Clarke said that it could not be used. Bill Poteet asked when FDOT would be able to determine if a noise wall was necessary or not. Sarah Clarke said they are working on the studies right now and the studies that are completed show it right on the cuff. She said that Carter & Burgess said it would probably be another 30 days before they would know if the analysis meets or does not meet the criteria. There is still the public involvement portion of it that has to be completed. Bill Poteet then asked if a noise was not determined necessary could it be substituted with a berm. Gene Lozano stated during the early processes it was looked at and it would mean taking much more land for right of way and it would mean that what was presented to the public would have to be redone. It is virtually a non -issue at this point. Bonnie MacKenzie asked if the property owners could give an easement for this purpose. Gene Lozano said that this would open up some very sticky issues since it would involve public expectation that was presented to the general public during the start of this planning, federal involvement. The committee could, through the involved property owners, bring it to the FDOT for consideration however he said that there were too many agencies involved for him to give an answer to that. It would require unanimity of all of the property owners to accomplish this. Bill Poteet asked if FDOT had drawn the lines of where a berm would be if it was put in. The answer was in the affirmative since that was how it was determined how much property would be taken by the interchange. Gene Lozano said he was not sure that any drawings still existed and that it would take a search of the files. Ed Kant requested that the FDOT files be searched for any type of drawings that might assist the committee in determining the amount of land necessary to accomplish a berm. Sarah Clarke said this could be done. She further stated that it is the policy that any noise abatement device be located in the right of way rather than on an easement or right of way to keep control over the object. Bonnie MacKenzie said that since the committee does want to have a meeting with the involved property owners that are involved with the interchange, it would be a good item to bring up at that time. Ed Kant asked if Sarah Clarke could furnish the berm information to Pam Lulich prior to the next meeting. She stated that she would. VI. NEW BUSINESS: A. Coordination with Golden Gate Master Plan: Ed Kant introduced Amy Taylor, one of the planners in our Comprehensive Planning Section at the 3 ITIM county and is who has been assigned to restudy the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. She stated that the Board of County Commissioners requested that staff restudy the Golden Gate Master Plan which is an element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. A citizens committee was appointed to assist with that restudy. Glenn Wilt who is on this committee is also on the Golden Gate Master Area Plan Restudy committee. The sharing of information between the committees will be greatly enhanced by this. The area that is of common interest is in the proposed segments from 66'h Street SW to Santa Barbara. The land uses along those segments are the "Estates Designation" that allows for residential with some conditional uses allowed. Mark Morton asked if all conditional uses are permitted now. She stated that if any additional properties are eligible for a conditional use they must be located between two existing conditional uses. Amy Taylor said that they would be looking at land uses and would like to share the staff's and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy committee's ideas with this committee. She said they could propose that the ideas of this committee be incorporated into the Golden Gate Area Master Plan so that both are consistent with one another. Tom Collins asked if there was any chance of putting a moratorium on any amendments to the Golden Gate Master plan. Amy Taylor said there has been a hold on accepting private petitions from the Golden Gate Estates area particularly east of 951. During the restudy the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy Committee would be supporting that the area remain residential. Tom Collins asked if it was a possibility to make changing the land uses in the area around the interchange from residential to anything else anytime in the future as difficult as possible. B. Coordination with Golden Gate Beautification MSTU: Glenn Wilt suggested that this committee try to coordinate with the chairman of this MSTU Committee and have an exchange of ideas. Ed Kant said that the chairman was Cherryl Newman and we can invite her or a representative to one of our meetings. He said that they had inquired of his staff as to whether or not it would be advisable to extend the boundaries of their MSTU to include the interchange. They currently only cover Golden Gate Parkway to Santa Barbara. C. Commendations: Bonnie MacKenzie took the opportunity to thank Ed Kant and his staff members for the information that was presented at this meeting. She also thanked the FDOT representatives for providing the information that they did. The presentation was very informative and helped to answer a lot of the questions that they had and gave a lot of direction to them. Ed Kant stated that "that package ", (referring to the enclosures to these minutes) was put together by Pam Lulich and her staff. Glenn Wilt asked that his thanks be include for a job well done. D. Requests Made to FDOT: Bryan Dennis made a request on behalf of FDOT that all future requests for information be made in writing so that 7 16J1 they can better track what is requested and to insure that they don't forget what they will be required to bring. VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS: None VIII. ADJOURNMENT: Glenn Wilt moved to adjourn. Seconded by Bonnie MacKenzie. Meeting was adjourned at 12:00 Noon. The next meeting is scheduled for 10:00 AM, Monday, September 24, 2001 County Commissioners Board Room Turner Building(Bldg F, 3rd Floor) 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples E:3 16J1 �I I i 16J1 Golden Gate Interchange Collie- RAN(i� j, oz I ldv I A k 3 'Alp; I IT. M. 11 oc, k in, gam( y 1� Ile; AN �tl a`'• A W N gF *lit r nt. � - � je, MS� J'4 Alo L4 I LU!'79SM 315 " tli A(f) Yl I Ir OWL 7'r ii1 1.2 � d N E oc :a O L.; Z on � 0 IOU - m c i3 � Y N r.+ O v � � f0 H N f0 N � d i O Cs E E E w O Z U N E N :a O m Z p c 0 IOU - m c V � Y N E v � � f0 cc c N f0 N O m v cu V± to :3 a c W N U U b .W C OOO M N C d co m Cl) d0U)C) N - -- V N LL L1 11 Q E goo � � N i O Cs E E E w O Z U i� ry R O N V Z 16J1 X N N y U N N 3 m U O U �O O. C 0 U G (0 a. f6 .r- E N :a m Z p c 0 - m c V � Y N ._ � � f0 cc c f0 N O m v cu :3 a c N �cnU E C E N d0U)C) i� ry R O N V Z 16J1 X N N y U N N 3 m U O U �O O. C 0 U G (0 a. f6 .r- 3 O r�-, ca � E m o W +� cc N Uco m Q E c� _ O m E E E is 0 V d E w z m .E 2 O m O w, .0 -E E co O H 16 ,11 ca W Q W 0 C 0 �v d a co C d cn C E m O Z U E co z R v 0 m 0 .Q 'C i► co � w+ CY loll M010101LO101010 O O M O O O OO O r - WI— CD C 0 N N U z U Z z c N N CL 11 G N N i C cn -0 y co a 0 C CO (r ,c ° aa) I d > d c c H o a O m S aR g O E- U c V. axi J d c a� E t W U N 'C _ W C C ll N Co -6 LL c � a N O 0 c N 0 o c U m v N„ 0 t6 O m l6 9- ml m .N a a� m �z E d H ID o `o LL LL c W a� C) C) z d 00 000 woomw dui 66M 66M64 O- ; C(QC NCmDOCOD0 NO Nr Cr1 V V' rCOM fA 69 69 69 6% 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 40 M010101LO101010 O O M O O O OO O r - WI— CD C 0 N N U z U Z z c N N CL 11 G N N i C cn -0 y co a 0 C CO (r ,c ° aa) I d > d c c H o a O m S aR g O E- U c V. axi J d c a� E t W U N 'C _ W C C ll N Co -6 LL c � a N O 0 c N 0 o c U m v N„ 0 t6 O m l6 9- ml m .N a a� m �z E d H ID o `o LL LL c W a� C) C) z d W 4a m N W i+ O U U- E m I.I.. O N C O v d cc O N TZ O C� E E E m O Z V d E w Z t4 V r O m E N CY 16A ., N O ti J H O H m fl. m 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O M V W N v (OD O M OI V) 64 613. 64 69 64 ff} 64 6% 69 6A 64 69 w 0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O V- LOOM LO LO It V) V- 000000N� OD (D v (D N O M C14 0 H 64 64 fin, fA 64 64 64 6), 64 64 69 6R (/3. fn U) p > •a •a N y C y a) w N W d as N O O a� � w n O O w 3 UU 3 (j m c c Bo Zr) •E N :3 = :3 _ C N C C = X = a a � =c"I n.a2 (Y pp -�. V1 (V aO pp �OQ� m m (D CD _ - mia�j O0 LO a�mi00�n000Lno0 r.- M- r•r- Mr- M - N I- E E rn N'C a T N •L N C_ N C_ N C_ N C_ m C_ Y � as a) a) m� Taaaaa m m rnrn� O O U xx U) w N m M- m m m m m m m >> m m m Ix U�:(nv7Z5cn(n to C c c cc E m m m m_ _ __ 'c c p p- E E w e :: 21 a) a) 3 a) C:.O p o o p' j' j E E �- N c VJ N N N p V m m m p Q J Q. D_ D_ d C3 C'i m U5 m 05 m F- of w1www »aa❑ QJ�aaaaaC�Ci(nw 0 0 0 O M 10 N M m M O O d NI i H 16A ., N O ti J H O H m fl. m 3 0 O c� c M W N a O � c as � = N i L r d' d' c o m E E E R o Z U m E m Z v 'c 0 m o w, � c E �v Cl 16J1 0 N c O m m � N ca -a Ec m N N W N i+ N O V N m IL m O 4) EE Ecc „z w E m z m .E m r O O ,, E -F A � N 16J1 16J1 GOLDEN GATE INTERCHANGE ,�\-reus for L-andscapima Landscape A rews Acres e SF Ramp .A. I -'"5 twidscape are.o 48 I ' 5 15 8'4 8 Landscaping ai pond B2 (01 13 50' 6 Land,,capingarnund Dry Pon"I 0,76 ' 105 Utilit , , Strip t> {)"u X71,1 Landscaping it Ramp-WQ,,,! 0.0d 7``;•t} Utilitv Strip ().01 Pond I (Wet - 6'-8' -Depth L 2 5— Landscaping area - Pond 1 u,44 1� -1 2 Litior3i Pla=jtjng, -,,-kquatsi -, 1'hinun1g, is Pcind A t Dry - I' Depth ): 1-75 Central Median: 1-7' awdizin Ramp B. L'irldscap"ing"ll P01M cS MINI) arldscapi ml X�3 I Lands,�apulg Pond Bi O� , �3 L"midscapin L and wapmg 2 5— t1illy strlj;,tyt w kalllp 0,02 1� -1 2 Lalld�7capl:"4, 1, 7� wff R'lrylpi Pond. BJ ('W"et - 6'-S' ILLL�)th)- ljq ,iral Plantinv rAqLldtiC Plarlllf)141 Pond B2 —(Wet - W-SLDe T 1"imoral Ramp C: Vtiht> Landscaping S 0 "N Lank cap-,ng 9j 1124, 4 j 1,437,4k Pond C' i Wet - 6',S' QieD—th): Ramp D- 75 NE .1 �sl Lanjscamrw 4 Pond Q 13 Dr v - I ' Q!e li Pond D2 (Dr v Lj_l Depth 16J1 GOLDEN GATE INTERCHANGE ,Nreas for Landscaping Landscape Area-S Acreaae SF Access Road B /,-access Road C/ Golden Gate to 60'h St. SW: Strip - GGP -Acccss Road B 0,06 -161 Swale Road B Landscaping at ROW edge - GGP West 1 k) 204 Landscaping - Acccss Road R 13 1 -16136 Lwidscaping - Access Road C 0, 1 26 i. Utility Strip -- Access Road C 0,01 Sv.,ale - Aczc,s Road C 0,09 3( - Landscaping- Median - Cj(--TP - Easit 0,51 _' "2215, Landscaping 'Median 0, 16 "'19o"O Access Road,D/Golden Gate to 66Th St. SW: Utility Strip . West 0,06 Land,waping at mediar, - GGP Nest Landscaping at ROW edge - GGP West Landscaping? - Ac,:xss R(%at 1) 13 1 Swale - Access Road 1) O'N Utilay Stnp - Access Road 1) t t,07 Access Road A- Swale-A,:ccs Road Road A 0,0Q 0-0-1 Brill e. BriklU WOSI 0 04 Udit• Strip o'l"JI I L't-ffl(v Noe 2 ot, c 26 1 5 Is 3 ^9-10. 4 3t,"f4 2 16J1 n�!Mw • The Golden Gate Parkway between Airport and Goodlette-F rank. is characterized by naturalistic planting and long spans of sod. o Trees: Live Oak, Slash Pine, Strawberry Guava. c Palms: Washington Palm, Cabbage Palm pa'2e I of, _' 16J1 Golden Gate Parkway Al',Toft-Goodlefte o Shrubs jAccents: Thryallis, Spider Lily, Parson's juniper, variegated pittosporum, silver saw palmetto o Groundeovers: Dwarf bouganvillea, Giant Liriope, Hai Nrthorn. c Sod: St. Augustine o Construction Costs: S275,000.00 16J1 Goldet GateParkway Santa Barbara to 951 IIIIIIII III� I • The Golden Gate Parkway construction bean in 1.986. The medians are wider with a t-yreater vanety of mature plant. material. o Trees: Florida Maple, Hong Kong Orchid', Black Olive, Floss-silk Tree, Green Buttonwood, Jacaranda, Live Oak, Mahogany, Silver Ta'bebuia, Tabebuia o Palms: Cabbage Palm Golden Gate Par�vay Santa Barbafa 'to 9J'1 o Small Trees/Large Shrubs: Marlberry, Sweet Acacia, Orange Geiger, Spanish Stopper, Dahoon holly, Crape Myrtle, Sweet Bay Magnolia, Wax ?n Myrtle, Rapanea, Wild Lime o Medi*um Height Shrubs: Erect Bottlebrush, Pampas Grass. Red Stopper, Thryallis, Red Star Hibiscus, Wild Coffee, Saw Palmetto. 16J1 Golden Gate PAway Santa Barbara to 951 Low Shrubs: Bush Daisy, Prairie iris, Jasminum, Dwarf wax mvTtle, Boston Fern, Plumbago, HaNvthorn, Facahatchee Grass, Coontie. c Groundcovers: Sprengeri Fern, Pineland snovvberry, Daylily, Parsonii juniper, Weeping lantana, CT'opher apple, Liriopel, African iris c Sod: St. Augustine "'floratam" 16J1 Golden Gate Pa�way Santa; Barbara Curbing: NIoLintable Type ­A" 4.'* Pedestrian Walkways: 5 foot wide asphalt v* Side Riaht of Wav: Grassed ShOUlders sloped down into a sale system adjacent to the riaht-of-way. Construction Costs; approximately $400.000/Mile Irrikyation & landsc,,C,IPI'n2 Only Total Area: approximately 1.9 median mile, 130-foot right-of-way easements. 16J1 Col.11'er Blvd. /951 Landscapi`ng Collier Blvd. /95 1 RoadNvay.Median Beautification has a wide variety of trees, shrubs and gl-Mindcovers. o Trees: Red Nlaple, White Hong Kong Orchid, White Geiger Tree, Jacaranda, 4 Varieties of Crepe Nth rtles, Wax Nplyrtle, Slash Pine, Copperpod , Live oak, Silver Trumpet, Purple Trumpet, and Bald Cypress. o Palms: Cabbage Palm pate I ot, 3, 16J1 Collier,Blvd. /951 Landscaping o Shrubs ZAccents-. Dwarf Bouganvillea, Thrvallis, Ixora, Plumbago, f4a,,N-thorn, Saw palmetto, Yellow Alder G D roundeovers: aylily, Juniper. La ntana, Yellox,v- African Iris, Purple Queen,'Gama Grass. Coontie -:o, The project ��,-as diNrided into t,,Nro segments: Phase A. extends from Golden Gate Parkwa,� South to the Golden Gate Canal Bridge. The medians are an average width of 15 feet. The length is one mile. * Construction Costs: S261,250 ■ Total Area: 79,200 SF * $3.30 / SF Ruae ` ot, I 16J1 CoI11'er Blvd. /951 Landscapi'lig o Phase B is from Golden Gate Canal Bridge to Green Blvd. The medians vary in �Nridth but are generally= 20 feet or xvider. The length is one mile * Construction Costs: $410,000 * Total Area: 142,431 SF * $2.88 / SF Maintenance Cost: $.50 per SF anniially or S81,250 per linear foot. P!i,-,e 3 of 3 GOLDEN GATE INTERCHANGE Approximate Estimates for N'tedian Beautification Installed Medlan BeaUtification Corridors: i. Golden Gate Parkway (Goodlette- Frank to Air port- Pulfina): Area/Distance: 1.3 Miles of improved medians. Medians are narrow', Construction was almost 10 years ago thereforeS-50'0(y) price adjustment Nvas added to the�cost of: - ffie project, Construction Cost: approx. S217,501), ri,iodified adjusted price S 3225 MO Cost per.Ntile: �21 1 —500/ni4le, modified adjusted price S2,;0,000/mile Golden Gate Parkway (Santa Barbara to 951. ): Area/Distance- -.*- Approx. 2.5 Miles Roadway. -.*- Construction C ost I'Or Installation: S400,()(X) per infle 3. 951 (Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd.): .Xrea/Dista nce- Phase A tGolden Gate Parkway South to Golden Gate Canal BrIdae), I mile length. 15' medians. -*.- Cowstruction Cost: S261 .250, Total Area: 79.200 SF. S3.306 Phase B (Golden Gate Canal Bridue to Green Blvd), I mile lenalth. -*.- Construction Cost: S410.000, Total Area: 142,431 SF, S2,88/ SF Pa L,,e 3 of 5 16J1 Proposed Segan_, i,e..,. n L s L Golden Gate Parkway (Airport- Pulling to 66'b SL SW): Area/Distance: 1. 5 M i les, Unimproved medians, Medians 10'- 15' Future Cost for landscaping and irrigation: GOOdlette Frank-Airport Pulling Design Style: S3 171,150.W, modified '--,375,0('X) ❖ Golden Gate Parkway -Santa Barbara to 951 Design Sode: $600,000 951 Phase .-k (Golden Gate Parkway South to GiOlden Gate Canal) Design Style: $391,375 951 kase-B Golden Gate Canal to Green Bk,,,d) Design Style: "615,0W Golden Gate Parkway (66"' St. SW to 60'0 St, SW)-. Area/Distance: Approx. .81"Ailes, 71,4318,40SF Future Cost ror landscaping and irrigation- Goodlette Frank-Airport Pulfirq-, Deign Styte:`,,-,l69,20O, modified price "S-200,f)(10 Golden Gate Parkway - Santa Barbara to 951 Design Stele: "'320,00 951 Phase A (G4,4den Gate Parkway South to Golden Gate Canal I Desion Stele; S209,000 951 Phase B K'Jolden Gate Canal to Green Blvd) Design Style: S128.(,H)O 3. Golden Gate Parkway ('60"' SW to Santa Barbara): Area/Distance: Approx. .5 Miles Future I ost for landscaping and irrigation: ❖ Goodlette Frank,kiiport Pulling De>lgn Stile: 5105.769, triodiried price S,125,000 Golden (,-;ate Parkway - Santa Barbara to 9,i I Desitm Stile: S 2100. 000 951 Phase A (Golden Gate Parkway South to Golden Gate Canal) Desi in Sty le: S 10,625' 951 Phase 6 (,Golden Gate Canal to Green Blvd) Design Style: 205,(,X)O Pa,_ ,e 4 of 5 16JI Li*ttoral Planti*ng I . # 0 6 1 The 'Wet Po-)nds are excavated for fill material and the depths can exceed 20 feet as seen �)n Livinty-ston P,(.)ad. The installation cost was approximately ",)7,,0()(). The pond depths propt)sed for the Golden Gate Interchange are 6'-8' f- .)r W'et Ponds and I' depth fOr Dry P(,)tlds. ❖ 1: 10 Slope required, 3.5' [)epth, 18" variation itt surface depth. A sloped shelf should be graded prior t.(.) filling the T,),(,)nd �vith water. Pil�)t pr(.�ject on Santa Barbara exists t(�) test theories and Maintenance requirements. The installation cost was approx. '-,4,()Oj) and was installed by Rtiad & Bridge and Natural Resources, Collier County. I Vill 3: 16J1 C'% a; (v cc Z LLJ LU Uj z uj F- uj tn F- 3: 16J1 C'% a; (v cc F, Fm Hi rra�i 1. yy 44 1. 16J1 Rai*lm*g 1-75 / Golden Gate Interchange There is a pedestrian sidewalk, on the bridge and therefore railing is required. Linear length of railing is 588 feet on each side of the bridge for a total Of 1176 feet. Per FDOT Plan Preparation Manual, Fig 8.1 a chain link pedestrian cage is proposed as the railing. c) Purpose of a Cage: to keep people from climbing over the fence. o Types: Full Curve and Half Curve Fence. o Height: 13' -q" with a radius cif 4 1-6" o Average linear foot price for Chain Link Fencing is approximately $6.c)o/LF 10 16J1 O aql � �dl '� • EL'M In Railing: 16" high Barrier Wall Rallinsz *+** Steel, Primed. Wet Spray Paint ***# Installation bid 77.00 per linear foot uninstalled Prefabricated by Spencer Fabricators 6 1 1 Concrete Form )e(ort -*.- 320 SF re- usable finer at a Cost $15-$30 per SF + Stained and Grouted 41-69 SF of textured Concrete -.*- Supervised Installation of Custom Rock -*.- Vattern 1104 - Random Cut Stone (14-3/4 coursing) Prt�ject: N-fississippi River Flood Wall -+.- Owner: City of St. Paul 16 1 rm it Concrete Fo Wor Concrete Form Work.: Textured Coping wing between the wall an the parapet zn -15 1'- 10,864 SF architectural surface treatments on parapets, win,-), vvalls and abutments using Custorn Rock. ❖ Staining and ,routing It, - -*.- Pattern 11(")3 Rustic Aslar, 1203 New England Drystack 16J1 Landscaping Costs of Western Beltway Design Conceut: Naturalistic Tree Plantings of Slash Pine, Live Oak, Cabbage Palm, Bald Cypress, and Crape Myrtle; Native Grasses; Shrubs and Groundcovers comprise the plant palette. Other items include: hand watering, Erosion Control, Weed Barrier, No -Mow area preparation, bed preparation and pine needle mulch. The Western Beltway is a parkway system 23 miles long. The client is the Orlando Orange County Expressway Authority (OOCEA). Cost Estimate: **.*Ramp A: $90,770.89 r " :•Ramp B : $90,168.70 ❖Ramp E: $77,795.10 ****Ramp F: $57,780.25 ❖ 441 Interchange: $185,788.85 - ".Eastern ,most terminus of the Beltway e' y •:� Mainline Plaza: $4614,200.20 i�vestern Beltway's Toll Collection Plaza houses administration, office, parking and operations. 16J1 VISUAL ASSESSMENT L�JJ NTERCHANGES for the Golden Gate Interchange Advisory Committee Transportation Operations Department NANCY SIMON Community Development & Environmental Services -TYPE A LANDSCAPING 16J1 ......_._....._. _........ . Type A Landscaping is minimal planting with flowering, trees, oaks or pines and sod. There are few planting beds. FiV16'777'17""i INTERCHANGE IN SARASOTA INTERCHANGE IN SARASOTA Minimum Planting: flowering trees, live oaks and sod. 16J1 INTERCHANGE IN SARASOTA HIGHWAY 1 -4 Minimum Planting: existing pine trees, additional oaks and palms. Minimum Planting: replanting pine stands, sabal palm trees and sod. 16J1 Minimum Planting: Minimal palm, ornamental grass bed and required retention pond. 16J1 ffifl�] I ]III, I ' I MqiU Type B Landscaping is characterized by plantings along embankment and naturalistic plantings along corridor edges. Minimum Planting: exterior shrub and palm planting along embank- ment. 16J1 Minimum Planting: planting beds along embank- ment, clustering of pines and ornamental grass along the edge. e TY LANDSCAPING 16J1 PE Type C landscaping is characterized by plantings of trees, palms and ___......____ shrubs along the embankment with additional hardscape features such as civil linear terracing and a more manicured landscape. Minimum Planting: lush planting of trees, palms and shrubs along the embank- ment with curvilinear terracing and manicured landscape, Minimum Planting: terracing along embankment accented with trees, palms shrubs set within a park -like setting 16J1 Minimum Planting: variation of tree, palm and shrubs along terraced embank- ment, GOLDEN GATE MASTER PLAN establish zoning district to maintain residential character. Commercialization: gas stations and food prohibited at interchange GATEWAY OF NAPLES R ailing typical railing details/what will the bridge looks like? PRESERVE THE CHARACTER OF THE PINE LANDS Natural pine berms between service road and Golden Gate Parkway � as � 4 ri 7 4fw =wok° .. t '."` k '" g. r shy* f` *5 t'�K'� ,• � '� f "t k.`s rH 77 S e ✓ '`�' �,'� to 'w • t yr r t y 16J1 DETAIL OF PRECAST CONCRETE NATURALISTIC PINE BERM POSSIBLE SERVICE ROAD SITUATION 16J1 OPPORTUNITIES CONCRETE FINISHES on bridge, retaining walls and sound walls. A Yo�i� i �m ry IN 2' St3 r 1 T- 4on ..... .... 50R; Imil e r G A B o u le v a r d IF I y o v. c r � ; t j vj , ii f nn f> x:;., , k U a ri f-?.T., i. f &,.i J, J �I 16J1 A KC HI T lc 'r V R U • r X C 1,0 t OX Dt' S 1 0 N IJ zl �zz 51 All, 16J1 r&qwm lob 01,1Vrik - (;IJDf)FN & PARTNERS �R( tl'mll�CILRI! - t%li.itioR "Li"N ko �21 • --7:7 16J1 lob I I- c 1 112 R 1, 16J1 A !- Vz" V, a WAN ()[,I% F.R, (; LIDDEN & J'AR I'NrRS AR I It 1 1: "'I -.;;' I • I I: 1s " l" Si Cl L 1 I C; N "'1 13 o !f MIS zt.t,-- -Thi 16J1 rZORM LVA- W- m OLIVER PARTNERS ARClttl!;(-ILRL • :N'Llti-11 Ui:ll(iN / i � t 16J1 A ft, A I.A o B r i P is to n OLIN ER (-LIDDEN & PARTNERS A R(: H i r L c r U R 1: • I NT FR 1 0 R D F 4 1 Q N 16J1 Typical Roadway Sections Considerations: ❖ FDOT has proposed a rural profile for frontage, back roads, and rural 2 lane traffic areas. There is a swale for drainage and no curb. (Typical Section, Sheet 7, Carter- Burgess Construction Set) o Curb and gutter changes the complexity of the drainage. o Type F Curb and gutter allows for more landscaping in the horizontal clear zone. ■ With the 6" Type F curb, the trees can be planted 4' behind back of curb. The curb is higher and generally r , ' considered safer. The standard use is on the outside t, ■ Without a curb and gutter, trees are planted 16'off the edge of pavement per the 'FDOT indexes. This means no trees. The proposed curbing for Golden Gate Parkway .medians is the Type "E" Mountable Curb. This curb is generally flatter. Clarification is needed whether trees can be planted 4' behind curbing or if the 16' rule applies. o Collier County Landscape Operations & Maintenance recommends Type "F" curbing to be used on improved center medians to protect the irrigation, landscaping, and vehicular traffic. The curbing is considered safer. o Transportation Operations requests that FDOT respond to these observations and clarify the issues involved on this particular project. q� OL M -VNI Figure 6 a � � v N m M iT s 3 � w fl o°. D 4 og � a � � v N m M iT O N i-i mM HJ: os 4 � a Wf J O O C' I I �z so O N i-i mM HJ: os 16 J1 Roadway #11 Golden Gate Parkway, West Existing Conditions (Santa Barbara Blvd., North to Interstate 75 Passover.) Roadway descriptions: A .90 mile roadway running east and west within a 106 foot wide road right -of -way easement. The road is a mostly uncurbed divided four lane roadway. The posted speed limit is 45 MPH. This roadway is a major County, Community and Golden Gate City east / west arterial roadway. This roadway is the main entrance to the Golden Gate Community from the Naples Urban area. This section of roadway lies within the Corridor Management Overlay District per the County land development code Sec. 2.2.21. Signalized intersection: Santa Barbara Blvd. N. and this intersection is designated as major intersection per the 1988 "Corridor Management Study ". Curbing: The medians are generally uncurbed, except for mountable type "A" curbing on the noses of the median crossover locations and at medians with turn lanes built into them. The medians with turn lanes built in them have solid 6 foot concrete separators the distance of the stacking area of the turn lane, and then mountable type "A" curbing extending back to where the turn lane taper starts. Median Description: There exist .63 miles of median green area divided into 6 medians. The medians are grassed and level with the pavement or curb. The medians range in width from 6 feet at turn lane locations to 18 feet ( + / -) at the widest points. Side Rights-of-Way: The sides are typical grassed shoulders sloped down into a Swale system adjacent to the right -of -way lines. Roadway signage: The roadway signage consist of metal traffic and road identification signs mounted on 4" x 4" wood post. Overhead utilities: There are overhead electric transmission lines running along the north right -of -way line. Roadway lighting: There are no street lights continuously along the roadway only at the intersections on the corners with other roadways. Pedestrian walkways: There is a 5 foot wide asphalt sidewalk along the north right -of -way line. Bike pathways: Designated off -road, 5 foot wide facility shared with pedestrians. Roadside Development: The property along both sides of the roadway is less than 50% developed. The development is sporadic and consists of single family residences, day care facilities, model centers, health facility, church facilities, and private club facilities. The remaining properties are undeveloped. 3 -29 March 12th, 1997 3 a Q 2 d Q �r M 2NII n7l�d ��avN J amn rn% IN 3 a z tD J d un to .,l w w 3 z w off. a: o y M 111 Ca. IX y J } �z 1' d 1ME �Q V` flC �r I� W, W n� LL �3 N i1.. � M U- t z IL 0 J � v r 3 -M N n C O yS3M J X Q 4z n� LL �3 N i1.. � M U- t z IL 0 J � v r 3 -M N n C O yS3M 16 J1 1-1 ff s� SrAlln Iz- r �r a t %3 r. IV . . I z 11: -in .r4 r,4 CV) _-3 z 11: -in .r4 r,4 CV) 3 .p '8 J fl d Jr- z43 sz a 4 s Fiqure 4 u. �v �zz W N v d t- \21 � rQ 3� D� 7 OEM a � rQ to / s1t I'1 yS3 M 1r 7� OEM AESTHETIC L1GHTINq 4FFLORIONBRIDGES Page 1 of 3 16JI Tees Point Bridge, Jacksonville Florida ;TIC L;IGHTINC .�+UF t t . s� t ut 't rn -t s � • �iru t , nm �f consideraf -jp "stir a'1 naw be a t Florida, r:,r =ji,44,tigh esecYallyor 1 profile mlaldeAbg can be a low cci t alter `uAt `� e"O' 'd' irable aesthetic effects. What better way to dramatize the design rule that `form follows function' than to light it up for all to see! In addition to the obvious visual idesi'�n caMraints `enaineers must also consider cost, fixture type and maintainability. Rdos�evq Bridgei uart 'lo 'ida t Utilizing bridge feature lighting is not new in Florida, but has grown in popularity in recent .years,' On an International level, the Dame Point Bridge in Jacksonville, Florida was; named as a winner in the 1989 Internnational Association of Ii' htitn i 4ers t tae i tp om etition. It tr g. � 1�. � was one ofs *-Vien pr`tljocts�selp0- dilrom over 100 enlriesxhi uhQut;the wbti about 1987,man� net `high o ile' 44.idges built in Floriddhave incorpoeated decorative lighting Merrill Barber Bridge, Vero Beach Fl. features. These include the Sunshine Skyway dh http: / /www. dot. state.fl.us / Structures/ botm /bridgelightipg /"lighting.htm. 8/28/2001 r AESTHETIC LIGHTING OFFLORIDA BRIDGES Dodge Island Bridge, Miami Florida Page 2 of 3 16J1 Bridge over Tampa Bay with "up lighting" which accent the cable stays (see following page), the Acosta Bridge in Jacksonville (see following page), the Clearwater Pass Bridge in Clearwater, and more recently the Roosevelt Bridge, the Merrill Barber Bridge, and the Dodge Island Bridge (see bridges shown on this page). Bridge lighting can be installed at relatively low cost. The Roosevelt Bridge and Merrill Barber Bridge pier flood lighting costs were approximately $110,000 and $84,000, respectively (less than 0.3 % of the total bridge Jacksonville Florida A key issue of bridge lighting systems is the ability to maintain such systems throughout the life of the structure. The Florida Department of TransportAtion has worked closely with local governments through Joint Party Agreements to obtain,assistance witb,lighting. maintenance. Although the maintenance and power costs of these lighting systems are relatively low, experience has indicated that routine maintenance is generally more res onsi ,e using local government forces. tsources are°tsually'�dsign¢d +using flood lights that have specific beam p " y `np[dt S ieWing to gi�e;viel,d siredrgffect. Fixtures are generally either high P oll ,a t 4eiuminaries. High pressure,sodium lamps are generally 1 'n b d,can be # guishedfrom metal halide because of t 'A � Y *A ?Ilt i ,Qr gold: coq �bp,a+cltie�ed y adding.ienses to the fi age iture tiQ the;:pka�ius pale sltowing,a blue lighting O` s °cansci be added to the lighting systems to allow for variations in the bridge illumination during holidays or special local events such as boat parades. Upcoming Florida bridge projects that include decorative 1ighting are the Broadway Bridge in Daytona Beach and the 17th Street Bridge in Ft. Lauderdale. Existing bridges, such as the MacArthur Causeway Bridge in Miami, are being retrofitted vv th'lightiil"""f'he'¢roposed lighting scheme for the MacArthur Causeway Bridge is to be similatr to the�Dodge Island bridge which is also located in the vicinity. The District Six M ff" ' (� ' "'ifas v+�t'`1te& c�l9ei' wviihlheTP rt of Miami to coordinate the lighting of the 1. 'd �.724�f t•s p8 .'3,'�. "n� , +I..Y..4 y ' ,�� . $_d'. it ,.p Y .. , p .�fl� w `/ structures rK elightn1g %lighting htm 8/28/2001 /lww't ot�ste� AESTHETIC LIGHTING OFFLORIDA BRIDGES 16J1 Page 3 of 3 MacArthur Causeway Bridge and the Dodge Island Bridge aesthetic lighting schemes because cruise ships pass through the area making this a very high profile location for tourism. In summary, while bridge lighting is not suited for every site, it should be considered for bridges in `high profile' locations. Bridge lighting may be added at relatively low initial cost. The maintenance and electric costs of the lighting system must also be considered. While the lighted structures are picturesque, often reflections from boat wakes add an interesting dynamic effect as well. Ellen Daniel is a Design Engineer in the Florida Department of Transportation District Four Office in Ft. Lauderdale. Tom Andres is a Structural Engineer in the Florida Department of Transportation Central Office in Tallahssee. See More Pictures http: / /www. dot.state.fl.us / Structures / botm /bridgelighting /lighting.htm 8/28/2001 16J1 Decorative Lighting Lighting: o Golden Gate Typical Luminare: o Domus Series Lumec o Luminous Dome o Approximately $2,600 for single fixture, $3,400 for double fixture. o Direct relationship between spacing and fixture height. o Fixture Assembly similar to fixtures on US41E project. The spacing is 27 feet. naplesnews.com I Printed story Page 3 of 4 The loop road and the access roads are expected to make it easier to mana tend the interchange. Access roads will be constructed in the northeast, southeast, northwest and southwest quadrants around the interchange. The northeast access road will run in an east -west direction and will connect with 66th Street Southwest and 64th'Street'S'outhwest north 'of `the" Golden Gate interchange. Both 65th'Street Southwest and 64th Street Southwest are north -south roads that intersect with Golden Gate Parkway. The southeast access road will ruri from 66th Street Southwest to 64th Street Southwest in an east -west direction. That road will be built to the south of Golden Gate Parkway. The northwest access road will be north of Golden Gate Parkway and will go west from 62nd Street Southwest until it is parallel with 60th Street Southwest, which is a road south of Golden Gate Parkway. The road will then make a sharp south turn and reconnect with Golden Gate Parkway when it is parallel to 60th Street Southwest. The southwest road will run from 62nd Street Southwest to 60th Street Southwest and will be south of Golden Gate Parkway and run in an east -west direction. E -mail this story to a friend. iii Format this story for printing. Search our archive for related stories: advanced search Navigation: Go to today's Naples section front Go to our 7 -day Naples archive (-Go to another section... IF I_ Also in today's Naples section: 'Decline' in Marco population won't hit pocketbooks for now sward Bound' at work through ECC to get low- income students ready for college 2 Bonita Springs men die in crash; 6 others hospitalized Alert about possible hazardous materials turns up drums of fat, oil City to unveil boat slip plan for Pulling site; Pulling says he's taking ... Collier's indigent health plan may get a scaled -back budget Computerized map system gets ready for election test in Collier Development vows sidewalks will be connected in North Naples Homeowner's digging causes water main break street flooding in N. Naples Hundreds turn out for 'Old-Fashioned Ice Cream Social' Local deaths: Naples Michael Peltier: Internet is 'bleeding' state of much needed revenue Owner defends plans for towing company in Golden Gate Police Beat Shooting hoops (photo) State DOT continues on plans for I -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway Feedback: E -mail the naplesnews.com staff Write a letter to the editor View our directory of Daily News staff http: / /cf pps.n plesnews.c m/sendlink/printthis.cfm 8/27/2001 0 7 J I GOLDEN GATE 4--�. -3'6" U 16' 0" U." tic. VOrt013, aL DMS50-S LUMINAMS - r- �WhENQi�S► Gr�r»� f�1t� Et'Xl, LL7tIMAIM tQB+�. rC c�tit 1. .z 16JI.- ��n '�Acp�i�7 �G+P.A'ftVE. faA�LUAMiZ6i� S'i�= LS�GKKE� /�Lurttwtt day [�v MW tZCAJ- WWI? toaP5w. Pedestrian /Accent Decorative Light ht Fixtures 1322 Southeast 3e Terrace Cape Coral, Florida 33904 Phone: 941- 549 -5354 Fax 941- 549 -8209 0 R.J. Steedman, Inc. To: Collier County attn: Pam Lulich From: Ron Steedman Fam Pages: Phone Date: 8/27/01 Re: Golden Gate Interchange CC: I have reviewed the interchange drawings to determine the viability of performing the roadway lighting with the "Golden Gate" typical luminaire. As you are aware, there is an MOT criteria for roadway lighting levels and uniformity. I have looked at the bridge, the general roadway, and the ramp areas to ' determine., possible uses there. I do not have full construction drawings, and all concepts herein would tmeed 66 reviewed to determine compatibility with structural design, and possible interferences with uJildmrgr6und utilities. I would be pleased to coordinate with your consultants to make a complete review of all ramifications of this concept. In that the bridge structure is, as per your memo, to have all new concrete components, it should be possible to address the location and mounting of anchor bolts for the pole bases within the new components. This will eliminate the need for "retro-fit" drilling and epoxying of anchor bolts. It is possible to reach normal FDOT lighting criteria on the bridge by utilizing double luminaires in the median, with single luminaires at the pedestrian barrier wall. These assemblies would use the same approximately 16' luminous center as the standard "Golden. Gate" assembly. This, staggered type installation has been used on other MOT projects.. The ramps, areas; similarly, can also be lighted to MOT roadway lighting criteria with the standard luminaire asembly .,: Luminaire spacings and roadways sections that can be effectively lighted are dependent on the mounting height of the luminous source, as well as the optical system specified. If we were to increase the mounting height of the "Golden Gate" luminaire, we could increase the spacing between them and reduce the quantity necessary to perform the lighting function. This becomes an issue when we have a wide! roadway, as is the balance of "Golden Gate Parkway" and do not want to use the median for locatidin )f lighting fixtures. It is in this area that we would need to explore the option of increasing the luminous center to 25-27 feet, and/or use an optical system with different photometric characteristics. The luminaire assemblies on the recent US41 East MOT project have a luminous center of approximately 27' so as to perform the lighting function on that section of roadway. The optics employed there are the same as the "Golden Gate" assembly. The number of combinations of height and reflector are immense, and so some criteria as to height and light spill need to be addressed in the final'design considerations. The estimated installed cost of the decorative lighting can be ascertained upon completion of the design criteria in that spacings and mounting heights` do'bave cost impact. Generally, there should be no increase in wire or conduit costs as the system will still be the'sarrte length; and the electrical -loads will be I no greater, and pr I obably less, , than those . associated with a taller lighting system. Th6refore,'ihe quantity of luminaires, with pole bases, will be the primary cost adjustment in cost to a typical FDOT installation. Again, I would be pleased to work with your consultants in finalized design and costing. The "Golden Gate" fixture far exceeds the requirements for full cutoff classification under I ES. It is dark sky friendly, and efficient, an excellent combination for roadway lighting within urban environments. It has been used successfully on numerous FDOT and municipal projects. We look forward to being able to work with you on this new interchange and bridge. Thank you. 'A '41 • Page 2 16J1 GOLDEN GATE LUMINAIRE ASSEMBLY Luminaires shall be single or double pole mount units as shown on plans. Single luminaires shall be as specified herein, and double units shall be similar, except with two units mounted at 180 degrees. All poles shall conform to applicable windloading requirements. GENERAL Luminaires shall be decorative fixture /pole assemblies as shown on the drawings, and as per specifications herein. In the event of conflict, these specifications shall take precedence over the drawings. Luminaires are for use as street lighting equipment and shall meet applicable roadway lighting performance and wind load requirements of Cllier County. Luminaires shall provide full cut -off style lighting distribution as specified herein under "Optics ". All luminaires shall be U.L. labeled "Suitable for wet locations ". All design features of the specified products are included by reference herein, whether or not expressly noted in these specifications. All components shall exhibit quality workmanship and be free of defects. Manufacturer shall be IS09002 certified, an international quality assurance standard. Luminaires and poles shall have been approved previously for use on FDOT roadways. All welding shall be per ANSI /AWS D1.2 -90 standards. CONSTRUCTION Cast aluminum components shall be produced completely from certified ASTM 356.1 ingot per ASTM B- 179 -95A or ASTM B26 -95 and be free of any foreign materials, remelt, or other aluminum alloys. Copper content of ingot shall not exceed 0.25 %. Mill certifications shall be furnished on request. Castings shall be free of porosity or any foreign materials. Surface imperfections including pits, holes, etc. are not acceptable. No fillers or cosmetic repairs of any kind are allowed to correct or improve the surface finish of the castings. All castings must exhibit uniform wall thickness. Cast parts shall not appear to be warped, offset or shifted. Components of the luminaire assembly are as further specified below. LUMINAIRE Housing shall consist of a one piece cast aluminum mounting adaptor that is mechanically assembled to a spun aluminum dome housing. The dome shall be secured to the optical assembly with a 27 1/2" aluminum skirt. Total height of the unit shall be 19 1/2 ". Luminaire shall be furnished with a 16J1 decorative opal acrylic luminous dome, which is illuminated by means of a loo uplight reflector system slot. LENS AND LENSE FRAME Lens shall be tempered glass with a light transmission value of 98% and be secured to the lens frame by concealed aluminum parts. Lens frame shall consist of a single cast aluminum piece with a copolymer ethylene propylene gasket inserted in the sash position. The lens frame locking system shall provide tool -free access to the lamp by means of a latching mechanism. OPTICAL SYSTEM The reflector shall consist of a triple stage, multifaceted arc -image duplicator and shall provide a total downward coefficient luminaire utilization of no less than 70 %; total contribution of light above a 75 degree vertical angle shall not exceed 1.2% of rated lamp lumens on the streetside. The optical distribution shall be IES types I, II, III, IV, or V, as required per drawings, and shall be field rotatable in 90 degree increments. BALLAST Ballast assembly shall be mounted on a removable steel pan with quick- disconnect terminals. Ballast shall be 175 watt metal halide, UL or CSA recognized CWA -type with a power factor of 90% or better. Voltage shall be quad -volt, unless shown otherwise on drawings. ARM Arm shall be curved 2 3/8" OD aluminum tubing formed as per the drawings, with a .84" OD decorative tubing attached between the arm and central tubing. POLE Pole shall consist of a 4" diameter, ASTM6061 -T6 extruded seamless aluminum pole shaft welded to a 6 5/8" pole base. The shaft wall thickness of single assemblies shall be no less than .226 ", and of the double assemblies shall be no less than .318 ". A decorative two -piece cast aluminum joint cover shall conceal this transition. Pole shall be provided with a two -piece cast aluminum base cover which is mechanically fastened to the pole with stainless steel screws. Pole shall provide a nominal mounting height of 16 feet. FINISHES Surface preparation for aluminum shall consist of a four - stage "Hot Dip" chemical etching preparation. A special 16J1 environmentally friendly reactive organic conversion coating is then applied. This creates a continuous barrier between the aluminum surface and the powder coat for excellent corrosion protection and adhesion. A specially formulated U.V. resistant textured super- durable polyester powder coat shall then be electrostatically applied with at least 100 microns thickness. This shall be 100% solid powder, of high molecular weight to provide superior corrosion, impact, chip, and scratch resistance, with every powder particle containing the total color system. Powder shall comply with AAMA605 requirements. The powder coat will then undergo a controlled thermosetting process. The finish coating shall meet or exceed salt -spray resistance tests according to ASTM- B117 -73, and humidity resistance tests as per ASTM- D2247-68. Color shall be textured green, Lumital # "GN6 -TX ". Finish shall carry a published manufacturer's five -year warranty against corrosion, peeling, cracking, or fading. Single luminaire assembly shall be Lumec, Inc., catalog number 175SMH- DMS50SG *- FB- QV- LD- lA- RSV8094A- AM6U /16- GN6 -TX, or equal. 16J1 Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH THOMAS F. BARRY, JR. GOVERNOR August 16, 2001 SECRETARY MGR- L13 -01 I -75 /Golden Gate Interchange Advisory Committee Transportation Operations Department 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, FL 34104 Reference: Breakdown of Estimated Costs of Amenities 1 -75 at Golden Gatc ;Parkway New Interchange Financial Management ID No. 200732- 1 -32 -01 Dear Committee Members: Sincere y, Michael G. Rippe Director, Southwest Area Office MGR \lss cc: Nicole Mills, FDOT Bryan Dennis, FDOT Johnny Limbaugh, FDOT Sarah Clarke, FDOT District One, Southwest Area Office 2295 Victoria Avenue *Post Office Box 1030 *Fort Myers, FL 33902 -1030 (941) 461 -4300 *(941) 338 -2353 (Fax) * MS 1 -98 www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER As requested at the Committee meeting of August 9, 2001, the following is a detailed breakdown of the estimated costs of the amenities that were agreed to by the FDOT during the PD &E Study; 1. Landscape & Irrigation $300,000.00 2. Conventional Lighting (in lieu of high mast) $208,000.00 (increase) 3. Special Signal Poles (2 locations) $ 60,000.00 (increase) 4. Noise Wall Aesthetic Treatment $ 80,000.00 5. Special (Aesthetic) Light Poles $ 32,000.00 (increase) 6. Bike Lanes $ 32,000.00 7. Wider Sidewalk (from 5' to 6') $ 16,000.00 Subtotal = $728,000.00 S. 20% Contingency (includes Mobilization, MOT, etc.) $146,000.00 Grand Total = $874,000.00 If you':1ave a:.y — esticno, pleas:: co -+act nie at (9 11.1) 461 -A300. Sincere y, Michael G. Rippe Director, Southwest Area Office MGR \lss cc: Nicole Mills, FDOT Bryan Dennis, FDOT Johnny Limbaugh, FDOT Sarah Clarke, FDOT District One, Southwest Area Office 2295 Victoria Avenue *Post Office Box 1030 *Fort Myers, FL 33902 -1030 (941) 461 -4300 *(941) 338 -2353 (Fax) * MS 1 -98 www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER naplesnews.com I Printed story Page 1 of 4 To print this page, select File then Print from your browser. 16JI URL: htti)://www.napiesdailynews.com/01/08/naples/d633553a.htm H L D Naples front I Naples archive I help State DOT continues on plans for I -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway Monday, August 27, 2001 By LARRY HANNAN, Ijhannan@naplesnews.com Relief is on the way for Collier County's overworked interchanges. The Florida Department of Transportation is continuing its work on constructing a new interchange that will connect Interstate 75 to Golden Gate Parkway. Construction on the new interchange is expected to begin in 2004. The project, which is being supervised by the Florida Department of Transportation, is expected to take about two years to complete and will cost about $24.4 million. A new interchange will greatly ease congestion on the interchanges on Pine Ridge Road and Immokalee Road, said DOT spokeswoman Debbie Tower. "Right now there is a heavy reliance on those interchanges and without another one that reliance will only increase," Tower said. "Pine Ridge would have a lot of problems if we didn't construct a new interchange sometime soon." This interchange will be different from other interchanges in the area because state and Collier County officials have vowed to make sure this interchange remains residential. Most interchanges in the area have hotels, fast food outlets, gas stations and other commercial properties around them. The area around the future interchange is residential now and steps are being taken to ensure that it stays that way. t.of Trani polrtatiort GEORGE STERLING III/Staff The County Commission has begun taking steps toward establishing a residential zoning overlay around http: / /cf pps.n plesnews.c m/sendlink/printthis.cfm 8/27/2001 naplesnews.com I Printed story rage L or 4 p out ment. 16JI to keep develo that area designed p A zoning overlay would prohibit certain types of development around the Golden Gate interchange and the surrounding area. Exactly what would be prohibited has not yet been determined, but the development seen along Pine Ridge Road is likely to be banned at the new interchange. Tower said most interchanges that are built in Southwest Florida are constructed in rural areas. Development then springs up around them after they're built. "South of Tampa Bay development occurred around the interchanges," Tower said. "More often than not commercial development was spurred because of the interchanges." Collier County Transportation Administrator Norman Feder said a model for the new interchange should be Interstate 4. That interstate has interchanges that were zoned residential. "Typically around interchanges you see commercial stuff coming up," Feder said. "But there are ways to guard against that if you have a plan." The goal with the Golden Gate interchange is to maintain the integrity of the surrounding neighborhood and not disturb the residential nature of the community, Feder said. "We want this interchange to be a gateway into Naples," Feder said. "It should give people the sense that they're coming into a nice area when you get off the interstate." When built, the Golden Gate interchange should make a difference in the lives of Collier County citizens, Feder said. "It will make a very significant change in the road network of Collier County and provide much - needed relief to the interchanges on Pine Ridge and Immokalee Road," Feder said. Earlier this year an advisory committee was formed to handle issues relating to the area around the future Golden Gate Interchange. It is composed of representatives from the city of Naples, Collier County, local residents and organizations such as the Golden Gate Civic Association. County Commission created the committee earlier this year because the planned interchange led some nearby residents to express concern about its potential impact on their community. The commission will watch over all plans and attempt to be a public resource for residents near the proposed interchange. Committee responsibilities include recommending how the area will be landscaped after the interchange is built and being involved in planning whether to construct noise walls around the area. The committee also has a mandate to keep the area around the interchange residential. Mike Rippe, DOT district manager, said the project is now in its design phase, with the design plan 30 percent completed. DOT officials plan to construct a diamond- shaped interchange, with a winding loop road that will send traffic ftom Grolden,Gate.Parkway. onto northbound 1 -7.s: The design. als,o,,will.include the constructior_ of four access roads near the interchange. http: / /cf pps.n plesnews.c m/sendlink/printthis.cfm 8/27/2001 Cart 611 arter Henning _ Mac'Kie ►� COWMA WZA COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT August 28, 2001 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 Meeting Noti ce Rural Lands Area Assessment Oversight Committee The next meeting of the Rural Lands Assessment Area Oversight Committee is scheduled for September 17, 2001 at 5:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Corkscrew Middle School, 1165 Oil Well Road (C.R. 858), Naples, Florida. Enclosed please find an agenda for the meeting. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me at the Collier County Planning Services Department (941 -659- 5737). Sincerely, Linda Bartel m Planning Technician II /lb Enclosure Disc. Torres: Date: !?)I a'n . Item# l U ( Copies To: PHONE (941) 403 -2400 FAX (941) 643 -6968 www.co.collier.fl.us *Draft 16J1 RURAL LANDS ASSESSMENT AREA OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE AGENDA MEETING DATE: September 17, 2001 MEETING TIME: 5:30 p.m. LOCATION: Corkscrew Middle School Cafeteria 1165 Oil Well Road (C.R. 858) Naples, Florida I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 20, 2001 III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. OLD BUSINESS BCC Workshop 9 -26 -01 Summary Presentation V. NEW BUSINESS VI. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT VII. FUTURE MEETING DATES October 15, 2001 October 22, 2001 VIII. ADJOURNMENT 16J1 *Draft RURAL LANDS ASSESSMENT AREA OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MINUTES August 20, 2001 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Joseph Boggs Grady Miars (exc.) Floyd Crews David Santee (exc.) Ron Hamel, Chairman Sonya Tuten (exc.) Rodney Harvey James Horner James Howard Dawn Jantsch Andrew Mackie Ann Olesky Kathy Prosser Neno Spagna Fred Thomas COUNTY STAFF PRESENT OTHERS PRESENT Linda Bedtelyon, Planning Services Roy Batty Stan Litsinger, Comprehensive Ping. Manager Brad Cornell Bill Lorenz, Natural Resources Dept. Director Mike Duever Marjorie Student, Assistant Co. Attorney Terry Flora Mitch Hutchcraft Tom Jones Bernie Lester Mark Morton Bob Mulhere Jeff Perry Al Reynolds Ann Marie Saylor Jerry Schoenfeld Michael Simonik Eric Staats Mike Taylor CALL TO ORDER (Item I.) The meeting was held at Corkscrew Middle School, 1165 Oil Well Road (C.R. 858), Naples, Florida, with a quorum present. Chairman, Ron Hamel called to order at 5:40 p.m. 16J1 APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Item II.) Jim Horner moves to approve the June 18, 2001 meeting minutes, Kathy Prosser seconds, and the motion passes, 11:0. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Item III.) Chairman Hamel notes requests to revise the agenda, including: adding item to "Old Business ": Discussion of county staff role and Bob Mulhere's consultancy contract as staff liaison; and deferral of "New Business" item: "Tourist Impact Tax'; Jim Horner motions to approve amended agenda, seconded by Floyd Crews; motion passes, 11:0. OLD BUSINESS (Item W.A.) Ron Hamel introduces Stan Litsinger who says that," staff is coming back in a more active role to join with the committee and also the WilsonMiller team, which has done an excellent job collecting the data and continuing to work on scenarios and various options in the toolbox that we will deal with over the next several months..." Stan went on to say that Bob Mulhere has been retained as an "extension of county staff', who will be working very closely with county staff, the committee, and the WilsonMiller team; "Bob will be drafting a lot of the work products for us and coordinating with you and senior staff at the county "; Bob to address the work -plan and schedule later in the agenda; (Item W.B.) Discussion of June 18, 2001 workshop results: Jerry Schoenfeld asks for question /comment on the survey results from the June workshop meetings: A discussion as to how the information tabulations will be used to follow. NEW BUSINESS (Item V. A.) (Summary handout prepared by WilsonMiller) Discussion of Rural Lands Stewardship Act: Bob Mulhere says that two bills that were passed could potentially have some bearing on the work that the Rural Lands Committee is doing; He notes the Rural and Family Lands Protection Act is intended to provide some funding mechanisms to agricultural property owners for various types of easements: agricultural easements, resource conservations agreements, etc.; The Rural Lands Stewardship Act, (F.S. 163.3177) Bob notes, some of the purposes and goals coincide with some of the objectives of the Final Order that the committee has been dealing with over the past year; Bob says the Rural Lands Stewardship Act would initially provide for the creation of five areas (state -wide) that could be classified by local governments as "Rural Lands Stewardship Areas "; the program will be administered by the Department of Community Affairs; he goes on to state some of the requirements of designation and the application and selection process as listed in the summary handout. He tells the committee that this may be "something we may want to explore; it may be part of the scenarios as we develop them" and "what's contained in this summary ... are the kind of things you've all been talking about throughout the process; what's most encouraging is that the act addresses these and should give you some sense that you're moving along the correct path; the act is largely an adjunct to the Governor's Growth Management Study Commission and is one of the elements of recommendation as a result of the study that has become law "; Fred Thomas asks how the "test sites" will be chosen, and says "if we want to have this option available, and be one of the initial test sites, we may need to get kicked in gear if there's going to be any competition for it around the state "; iC�II Bob says, he'll find out when a local government will have to designate an area and go through the process;" it's going to take some time if you have to amend the Comprehensive Plan, so they obviously are aware of that "; he says he'll try to come back with answers about the time - frame and flexibility in terms of the transfer of development rights process; (Dawn Jantsch arrives at 6:00 p.m.) (Item V.B.) Board of County Commissioners Workshop Presentation: Al Reynolds addresses the committee saying the September 26, 2001 workshop with the BCC will consist of a summary of the Rural Lands Committee's progress; topics to include: history and future of agriculture in the county as it relates to the Rural Lands study; condensed version of Stage I Study, Power Point presentations, involving committee, staff and assistants with work done up to date, including Stage II thus far; as well as the work plan going forward; question /answer, public participation will follow; Al asks for committee input and says summary will be provided at meeting prior to the workshop; Kathy Prosser asks if there are any concepts that the Rural Fringe Area Assessment Committee is working on that "overlap" so it can be noted to the BCC that "they see that we are looking comprehensively at this issue "; Ron Hamel comments that because of the mandated process, and the funding, in part, by private property owners, that make a difference between the Rural Fringe /Rural Lands committees, be noted in the introduction to the BCC; Bob Mulhere distributes proposed work and committee meeting schedule for remainder of 2001: Discussion followed and Fred Thomas motions to approve, seconded by Kathy Prosser; the motion to approve the proposed schedule passes, 12:0. (Item V.C.) Scenario Toolbox: Al Reynolds discusses Technical Memorandum on Scenarios and Draft Rural Lands Assess ment/Immokalee Area Toolbox saying scenarios are described in the scope of the study as a tool to evaluate options to achieve the Final Order objectives, "scenarios are intended as a vehicle to get us to an answer, there are not the answer'; it is a tool to be used to refine processes; the scenarios will be evaluated using an evaluation matrix and the GIS database to evaluate future land use scenarios, as well as a transportation and economic assessment model "; Al goes on to describe "Toolbox" as a term that's used in the market that makes a lot of sense in this situation: a variety of tools /techniques are available to achieve compliance with the Final Order objectives; "Collier County is going to have a set of Goals, Objectives, and Policies that are going to guide every decision that gets made in the Study Area and presumably, we are going to have a different set (of GOPs) than we have today; that's the reason we're doing this study "; Al says that the survey results from the "Visioning Workshop" that the committee produced this summer are another tool that will be used; he goes on to say that the planning process has to be flexible in the long view, to cover the next 25 years; Discussion and comment followed while viewing several maps depicting sub - areas, including "interim" NRPA boundaries and Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC); Andrew Mackie stresses the NRPA boundaries are designated "interim" until and if, at such time they are re- appointed; Fred Thomas asks Al for copies of map - analysis sub - areas; Al points out all the maps used are in the Stage I report; Andrew comments that the 11,000 acres of privately held lands in Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary are not public lands, though public use is permitted through permission of the owner, which is the National Audubon Society; he recommends to staff, when calculating publicly owned lands, not to include the privately owned conservation areas; Kathy Prosser asks Al if the NRPA depictions on the map could be changed from green to another color; Al says they can, and that 16J1 privately owned conservation lands such as Corkscrew Swamp can be labeled as "conservation ". GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT (Item VI.) Andrew Mackie asks when the Transportation model will be ready and Al Reynolds responds that it's based on the adopted County's MPO model and was presented to the committee by Jeff Perry earlier this spring; Ron Hamel asks Al if all public comment is in on the GIS data and if it's been determined that it is the most comprehensive, best available data; Al responds, "yes, it's been out there now for six, seven months and we did get some very specific comments that have been addressed and incorporated into it. By common acknowledgement we are working with the best data base that we can have "; Chairman Hamel called for any further public comment and there was none. FUTURE MEETING DATES (Item VII.) September 17, 2001 and follow agreed upon schedule distributed by Bob Mulhere ADJOURNMENT (Item VIII.) Committee decides unanimously to adjourn at 7:15 p.m. A taped and hard copy of these minutes in final form are available at the Clerk of Courts, Minutes and Records Office, Building F, Collier County Government Complex, minutes may also be viewed on the website: www.nasites.com /collier, Rural Assessments page Fiala Carter Henning! Mac'Kie Colette *Final Approved 9.17. 01 16J1 Ed-chcomm, o RURAL LANDS ASSESSMENT AREA OVERSIGH' COMMITTEE MINUTES August 20, 2001 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Joseph Boggs Grady Miars (exc.) Floyd Crews David Santee (exc.) Ron Hamel, Chairman Sonya Tuten (exc.) Rodney Harvey James Horner James Howard Dawn Jantsch Andrew Mackie Ann Olesky Kathy Prosser Neno Spagna Fred Thomas COUNTY STAFF PRESENT OTHERS PRESENT Linda Bedtelyon, Planning Services Roy Batty Stan Litsinger, Comprehensive Ping. Manager Brad Cornell Bill Lorenz, Natural Resources Dept. Director Mike Duever Marjorie Student, Assistant Co. Attorney Terry Flora Mitch Hutchcraft Tom Jones Bernie Lester Mark Morton Bob Mulhere Jeff Perry Al Reynolds Ann Marie Saylor Jerry Schoenfeld Michael Simonik Eric Staats Mike Taylor CALL TO ORDER (Item L) The meeting was held at Corkscrew Middle School, 1165 Oil Well Ro it .fir 8), Naples, Florida, with a quorum present. Chairman, Ron Hamel called to order at 5:40 p.m. Gate: Item# Copies To: V 16JI APPROVAL OF MINUTES (Item 11.) Jim Horner moves to approve the June 18, 2001 meeting minutes, Kathy Prosser seconds, and the motion passes, 11:0. APPROVAL OF AGENDA (Item III.) Chairman Hamel notes requests to revise the agenda, including: adding item to "Old Business ": Discussion of county staff role and Bob Mulhere's consultancy contract as staff liaison; and deferral of "New Business" item: "Tourist Impact Tax "; Jim Horner motions to approve amended agenda, seconded by Floyd Crews; motion passes, 11:0. OLD BUSINESS (Item W.A.) Ron Hamel introduces Stan Litsinger who says that," staff is coming back in a more active role to join with the committee and also the WilsonMiller team, which has done an excellent job collecting the data and continuing to work on scenarios and various options in the toolbox that we will deal with over the next several months..." Stan went on to say that Bob Mulhere has been retained as an "extension of county staff', who will be working very closely with county staff, the committee, and the WilsonMiller team; "Bob will be drafting a lot of the work products for us and coordinating with you and senior staff at the county "; Bob to address the work -plan and schedule later in the agenda; (Item IV.B.) Discussion of June 18, 2001 workshop results: Jerry Schoenfeld asks for question /comment on the survey results from the June workshop meetings: A discussion as to how the information tabulations will be used to follow. NEW BUSINESS (Item V. A.) (Summary handout prepared by WilsonMiller) Discussion of Rural Lands Stewardship Act: Bob Mulhere says that two bills that were passed could potentially have some bearing on the work that the Rural Lands Committee is doing; He notes the Rural and Family Lands Protection Act is intended to provide some funding mechanisms to agricultural property owners for various types of easements: agricultural easements, resource conservations agreements, etc.; The Rural Lands Stewardship Act, (F.S. 163.3177) Bob notes, some of the purposes and goals coincide with some of the objectives of the Final Order that the committee has been dealing with over the past year; Bob says the Rural Lands Stewardship Act would initially provide for the creation of five areas (state -wide) that could be classified by local governments as "Rural Lands Stewardship Areas "; the program will be administered by the Department of Community Affairs; he goes on to state some of the requirements of designation and the application and selection process as listed in the summary handout. He tells the committee that this may be "something we may want to explore; it may be part of the scenarios as we develop them" and "what's contained in this summary ... are the kind of things you've all been talking about throughout the process; what's most encouraging is that the act addresses these and should give you some sense that you're moving along the correct path; the act is largely an adjunct to the Governor's Growth Management Study Commission and is one of the elements of recommendation as a result of the study that has become law "; Fred Thomas asks how the "test sites" will be chosen, and says "if we want to have this option available, and be one of the initial test sites, we may need to get kicked in gear if there's going to be any competition for it around the state "; 16J1 Bob says, he'll find out when a local government will have to designate an area and go through the process;" it's going to take some time if you have to amend the Comprehensive Plan, so they obviously are aware of that "; he says he'll try to come back with answers about the time - frame and flexibility in terms of the transfer of development rights process; (Dawn Jantsch arrives at 6:00 p.m.) (Item V.B.) Board of County Commissioners Workshop Presentation: Al Reynolds addresses the committee saying the September 26, 2001 workshop with the BCC will consist of a summary of the Rural Lands Committee's progress; topics to include: history and future of agriculture in the county as it relates to the Rural Lands study; condensed version of Stage I Study, Power Point presentations, involving committee, staff and assistants with work done up to date, including Stage II thus far; as well as the work plan going forward; question /answer, public participation will follow; Al asks for committee input and says summary will be provided at meeting prior to the workshop; Kathy Prosser asks if there are any concepts that the Rural Fringe Area Assessment Committee is working on that "overlap" so it can be noted to the BCC that "they see that we are looking comprehensively at this issue "; Ron Hamel comments that because of the mandated process, and the funding, in part, by private property owners, that make a difference between the Rural Fringe /Rural Lands committees, be noted in the introduction to the BCC; Bob Mulhere distributes proposed work and committee meeting schedule for remainder of 2001: Discussion followed and Fred Thomas motions to approve, seconded by Kathy Prosser; the motion to approve the proposed schedule passes, 12:0. (Item V.C.) Scenario Toolbox: Al Reynolds discusses Technical Memorandum on Scenarios and Draft Rural Lands Assessment/Immokalee Area Toolbox saying scenarios are described in the scope of the study as a tool to evaluate options to achieve the Final Order objectives, "scenarios are intended as a vehicle to get us to an answer, they are not the answer "; it is a tool to be used to refine processes; the scenarios will be evaluated using an evaluation matrix and the GIS database to evaluate future land use scenarios, as well as a transportation and economic assessment model "; Al goes on to describe "Toolbox" as a term that's used in the market that makes a lot of sense in this situation: a variety of tools /techniques are available to achieve compliance with the Final Order objectives; "Collier County is going to have a set of Goals, Objectives, and Policies that are going to guide every decision that gets made in the Study Area and presumably, we are going to have a different set (of GOPs) than we have today; that's the reason we're doing this study "; Al says that the survey results from the "Visioning Workshop" that the committee produced this summer are another tool that will be used; he goes on to say that the planning process has to be flexible in the long view, to cover the next 25 years; Discussion and comment followed while viewing several maps depicting sub - areas, including "interim" NRPA boundaries and Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC); Andrew Mackie stresses the NRPA boundaries are designated "interim" until and if, at such time they are re- appointed; Fred Thomas asks Al for copies of map - analysis sub - areas; Al points out all the maps used are in the Stage I report; Andrew comments that the 11,000 acres of privately held lands in Corkscrew Swamp Sanctuary are not public lands, though public use is permitted through permission of the owner, which is the National Audubon Society; he recommends to staff, when calculating publicly owned lands, not to include the privately owned conservation areas; Kathy Prosser asks Al if the NRPA depictions on the map could be changed from green to another color; Al says they can, and that 16J1 privately owned conservation lands such as Corkscrew Swamp can be labeled as "conservation ". GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT (Item VI.) Andrew Mackie asks when the Transportation model will be ready and Al Reynolds responds that it's based on the adopted County's MPO model and was presented to the committee by Jeff Perry earlier this spring; Ron Hamel asks Al if all public comment is in on the GIS data and if it's been determined that it is the most comprehensive, best available data; Al responds, "yes, it's been out there now for six, seven months and we did get some very specific comments that have been addressed and incorporated into it. By common acknowledgement we are working with the best data base that we can have "; Chairman Hamel called for any further public comment and there was none. FUTURE MEETING DATES (Item VII.) September 17, 2001 and follow agreed upon schedule distributed by Bob Mulhere ADJOURNMENT (Item VIII.) Committee decides unanimously to adjourn at 7:15 p.m. A taped and hard copy of these minutes in final form are available at the Clerk of Courts, Minutes and Records Office, Building F, Collier County Government Complex, minutes may also be viewed on the website: www.nasites.com /collier, Rural Assessments page O/U-y� COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR COURTHOUSE - BLDG. C -1 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 -4997 (941) 774 -8171 September 6, 2001 Honorable James D. Carter, Ph.D., Chairman Board of County Commissioners Collier County Courthouse — Admin. Bldg. /3 Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioner Carter: 16J1° �. Carter Hen K16 0040tta In accordance with the Department of Revenue Rules and Regulations (12D — 13.03), please find your copy of the Tax Collector's Recapitulation of the 2000 Tax Roll for Collier County, Florida (DOR Forms 502 and 503) for your records. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, Guy . ton Tax ector Enclosures Misc. Corres: Dde:.li. Item # - I Loa ( Copies To: O O O N' a 0 rLL r Z m /O V W J J U I� 41 � � O 'a V R R y C � 7 C N m C o V N C w O �p R E y 0 C CD R. w � m m t {4 V W J a LU ? Q Z c V N (O M M W r V- t: N O? O O OMi O fA W a0 . 7 r N 1L V N t- ° m°° W .w ad. W a co W (31 n v o v _ o p N r 0 Nc�E O p 0 N O 04 O O CO `OD O W r N N O Q ¢ °w z m co M p F- co coo_ N m r 0 M Q Lu V w n Irj Cl) co > J y y W M Q� U CJ N~ C '0 y co U y .+... 0 w a LLJ a Q U w o '> �j a o ' y a a w w Ja ° �O Q � � Q aci d c E w N m v r V cp ~ ° a x > z U C c o �° o ,0 W 0 w U x 0 w + O U W W p w O p 0 0 0 O O O O O v O O 0 0 Op p 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 a' y O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 } F W >1 It z z w � U N a pp pp pp 0 0 0V• Qa N O 000 4 N [°O c7 l0 0 Ix O a CN r 00 co N r^ O O O co U 0- O co M c+> sh r �f M ZN W a N N ti r !� � W 00 - W fV OLO LO a v IO Q w >O a Q Q N O 1n � W eO O> r Oi N W O W r w r 0 0 M 00 fD O O W m 0� Y m °o �� °° m w W Cl o LQ L M .- M IL ° O N N 117 •- N as a to O J -o V d o! 0 r 0 m O N a 0 0 0 V 0 �t 07 N O? ? O O O O O N O O O O O R NO M O 0 0 0 0 0 to N it w 00 o w U cn D UJ In O 0 M N a0 0 O O O O N n v o o S to Q H > w r o o W ro m° r- m O 10 M OD m po o 0 0 0 U a M N M V o N r to aO co r C R co rn 01 of t6 W LLl a ° N ° t0 o m m U) r o m r Q 0 J z ow E Q > Q Z 00 a0 W M p 0 Cl) O W N 0 O p p co d' f0 0 0 10 D O W w W O Ifl 1p t0 T O N N N OO IV m Oi N 0) m pO O O fV Lq� O N U K� 0 a00_ 000 r co N aQ Ori 1`r- O O is v N O N V S cn co K I� 41 � � O 'a V R R y C � 7 C N m C o V N C w O �p R E y 0 C CD R. w � m m t {4 V W J a LU ? Q Z c a aDo_ c C c a -" m .3 c w x O a m m U °- 0 Si LU LL V j O W Q' O 2— N .0 X m m J cr C N C p Ol N 'O > J y y W M Q� U CJ N~ C '0 y co U y .+... Y Q U w o '> �j a o ' y a a w w Ja ° a x m= Q aci d c E w N m v r V cp ~ ° a x v y U C c o �° o ,0 W 0 x 0 w + O U W W v U I- d 0 a' W Q Q _ N M a 0 V .o 0 0 N Q D O J LL F— z /D V W J J O V O U. W_ W J N H z W N U) W U) U) Q W w O J Q z O z LL O z O h- J a Q w 0 W J J ci i°n m F, m o z a W Z Z Q z s W H W J W H U. V W Q m W N J :2 a v W W d U Uj a W CL H H w Z W W 'S Q N H CD W 0 o � m � c � c � 0 F O � i c x : — H z Q, d o i — � N E o i do aAi O C > O J C = U = O N � o a � a N i �j�r�++ 0 CL i- w h (li ri v U L i ) O O Q) M co d CD (O LO N s o J l f- 6) OD � Cl) O OD aD Z pi r CO QC q CD N M) co O = l w — V N O ^ m f0 ID (O O M V Q X O N N m N � m U � co O o Q CD 0) i cfl r- Obi dK' f`7 W N I (O I h C7 e- N N N N co to m rn w .- ir U O Q Q Z O Z W Z Z Q z s W H W J W H U. V W Q m W N J :2 a v W W d U Uj a W CL H H w Z W W 'S Q N H CD W 0 o � m � c � c � 0 F O � i c x : — H z Q, d o i — � N E o i do aAi O C > O J C = U = O N � o a � a N i �j�r�++ 0 CL i- w h (li ri v U L i ) O O Q) M co d CD (O LO N s o J J � CL n c o o � N = o w — C O ID V m _ O v E ID Q � Q U X O N O y m N � m U 4 O o Q CD i cfl ao of ° r 16JI s V C R • L C � s _m m N c cts c o -� � o c o cc O N E �O o 0 cc c � m � t � R m o 0 0 J 0 a w Z m � a o 0 � A N a d v w a �U.O C) Q LLI W N LL F 0 O W V t- O N LO M M O ti N CD v N LO O N V LL I Cl) -,:r N O y 0 Z cc W. Z LL O W J D y uW— w Z a N 0 W W 0 Q H � } W V) J to IL w 2 U O C) a ca w �- Z F- N W } LL W w d N C) Q 0 0 0 0 co 3 3 N Q'. a Q m W a m N N N IL 0 �IZ w0 ZQ.' ZO�F' tea.: a O 0 Z a Z LL H Z Z V' i O M r a CO O ; O L . � CC "Co O O 07 M OD CCD co 0^D_ COi rW co lrM -- NOtn 1n C0MOMaDO 6J1 � N M M N I�- In I� 00 N p� M 1�- W N I'. M O M � r.- - W O LO M O N COD T M N O V' h N In N (h r N M co 0 0 C10Y O N N 0 N O O d 3 3 3 3 3 tc� cog m oc c U-1 m a� >. >. d g. ?, T O z Z to an d M° 0 N U) -1 m Z = F- w g V LLI F- W Z OU 0 Z m W N V W Ir w 0 w E Z W W o c O w o N/ .1 0. H QD� w m W E m {i O OLL' 0 c °� x d V 0 d cr Z ON w a c' d W O a ¢ Q av IN c m O J m LL. LLF 0 N m N C C) C C o 0 C 0 rn 0 rn 0 rn -T 2 c 06 Ga ca h F=V �mmQm N W F=- z It N U) -1 x Z = F- P g LLI F- W Z OU 0 Z m W 0 Z Ir w 0 w w j O a Q-1 O w g L U cn Q W F- m OQ MOu~0a U. 0 U C 0 cr Z iZ w00^�� Q av IN Z 0 M 0 � 0 t!) 0 CO 0 0 rn 0 rn 0 rn 0 rn 0 rn N x U c m N� N g co m d 00 Q Z 0 x C m c� .o c 07 m Q Z yl U fl.m ca O O U d N o� E CD m CO c f0 � c d � 3 � E � S c cn m xx m C ..4. c .to d c N m X 0 O O O U CL a a c E E E o O o C c c c 0 0 0 0 u U U 0 m LLJ Z ❑ Y a 0 Q Q Z ❑ 0 m m a co LL� w Y Z Z M w 4¢ W Q m CO Mo w ~ a❑ w w 0D- wQa2cncnOC7� W��(aj�❑ -iWWOU❑❑~ wa }� (r -jn ❑xJJ❑ - z Q w w w 0 Q 0<00W EzYam(nz E2c7c92 co O O- N _M O w t- G O O N 00 00 0 0 — 8 — 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn 0) m rn cn r8 rn rn rn rn rn rn rn 1OK1 MEMORANDUM Date: October 25, 2001 To: Jennifer Edwards, Supervisor of Elections From: Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Agreement For Election Services By And Among The City Of Naples, Collier County And The Supervisor Of Elections Enclosed please find one (1) original document, as referenced above, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on October 23, 2001 (Agenda Item #16K1). Kindly forward the agreement to the appropriate parties for the required signatures and return one fully executed original to Minutes and Records. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774- 8411. Thank you. Enclosures 16K 1 AGREEMENT FOR ELECTION SERVICES By and Among the City of Naples, Collier County and the Supervisor of Elections This Agreement for Election Services (Agreement) is for the February 5. 2002 city council election and is by and among the City of Naples (City), Collier County by and through the Collier County Board of Commissioners (County) as owners of the County's voting and ballot tabulation equipment, and the Collier County Supervisor of Elections (Supervisor) as custodian of the County's voting and ballot tabulation equipment. WITNESSETH In consideration of the premises and covenants set out below, and for $10 and other valuable considerations in hand received by the County and the City, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed by the parties hereto as follows: 1. The City acknowledges that only the Florida Constitution and the Florida Legislature may confer jurisdiction on the Board of County Commissioners and the Supervisor of Elections through various legislative enactments. Jurisdiction cannot be conferred by agreement, consent, waiver, or other voluntary act or involuntary act since jurisdiction is established solely by general law. 2. Section 97.021(7), Florida Statutes, provides the definition for "election" used throughout the election code and by definition, those elections for which the County and Supervisor are responsible. The City acknowledges that such definition does not include municipal elections. 3. Under the terms of the City Charter, the City is responsible for the conduct of all its municipal elections except when the City chooses to call a special election to be held by mail ballot. Such an election is subject to a separate Agreement for Services. 4. The home rule powers granted to cities by the Florida Constitution provide for the conduct of the February 5, 2002 City council election under the City Charter. 5. To facilitate the City's conduct of its February 5, 2002 election, the Supervisor of Elections shall do those items enumerated in Exhibit A identified as §19.1, Security Procedures for Municipal Elections of Collier County. 6. The City shall provide to the Supervisor of Elections and the Florida Attorney General a copy of the City's letter of submission and response to and from the U.S. Department of Justice relative to any changes which the City makes relative to polling site locations or any applicable charter amendment referendum questions. Such copy shall be provided no later than 5:00 p.m. on the fourth day preceding the election. 7. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, the County agrees to lease the following items to the City for use at the polls in its election: •120 Voting booths, ELS or equivalent self- contained Model 5 aluminum •120 228 position vote recorders and templates •120 Magnifying lens attached to the stylus chain •120 Voting Stylus -- one per booth\ extras to be provided • 20 Handicapped stylus -- one per precinct • 20 Demonstration vote recorders • 20 Ballot Boxes and ballot box tables • 20 Ballot Box padlocks and keys • 20 Long -stub Ballot Transfer Cases, aluminum 16K? • 20 Precinct Signs with mounting assembly • Precinct directional street signs and mounting assembly additional signs for 660 and 661 • 20 Precinct file caddy and supplies • 20 American Flags • 20 Flag Poles • 20 Vote Here Alphabet Card sets • 20 Alphabet card holders and assembly • Disabled Access Ramps only if precincts used match that for which the County had constructed a ramp • Laptop computer for each precinct 8. The City shall contract for and acquire all consumable supplies used in the election directly from the Vendor. The City shall contract for and acquire ballot cards which conform to the standards provided by administrative rules adopted by the state. Consumable supplies are those which may be used once. 9. The City shall arrange for the voting equipment preparation to occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Thursday and/or Friday preceding the election date. 10. The City shall arrange to have the voting equipment supplies picked up from the Elections Warehouse at 8:15 a.m. on the Monday preceding election day. 11. No later than the third day following the election, the City shall check or clean out the equipment to insure that no City election supplies remain in the file caddy, the ballot boxes, transfer cases, or voting units — either used or unused. 12. The City shall remove the masks and ballot pages from the voting machines and identify them for their records retention. 13. No later than 5:00 p.m. of the Friday immediately following the election, the City shall remove its supplies — both used and unused -- and transfer them to the City's own storage facility. 14. The City shall use the County's certified tabulating systems, as certified for use after July 1, 1993 under the new state standards, and pay directly to the approved vendor all costs for programming, on -site election support, and any repairs required as a result of the City's use. 15. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require the County or the Supervisor to provide the setup of equipment for use by the City. 16. This Agreement shall be construed to require the County or the Supervisor shall provide all oaths, forms, and training materials to the City's Pollworkers, Clerks and Oath Persons. 17. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to infer the County or the Supervisor interpreted the provisions of the City's charter or interfered in any way with the City's exercise of its home rule powers pursuant to the conduct of the City election. 18. Nothing in this Agreement shall require the County or the Supervisor to arrange for the acquisition or construction of additional equipment for use by the City at its poll sites should such equipment not already be in the County's inventory for that specific poll site facility. 19. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require the County or the Supervisor to arrange for the installation and delivery and pickup of voting machines or equipment to the City or to the poll sites for use on election day. 16K' waft 20. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require the County or the Supervisor to arrange for or acquire any supplies for use by the City for either the voting equipment or at the polls. 21. Neither the County nor the Supervisor shall be held accountable for equipment needs not contained within this Agreement. There shall be no last minute adjustments to this Agreement for equipment or consumable supplies. 22. The County and the Supervisor or the Supervisor's staff shall not provide equipment service calls during the course of the City's election. 23. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, the County agrees to lease to the City the ballot tabulation equipment components enumerated herein: • A Novell 3.2 file server with monitor and keyboard • A HP Laser Jet 5 printer; • A "host" Pentium 3 with monitor, keyboard • Three F & C M1000N card readers; • All existing cabling and power cords; • Current county configured and attached Best UPS Systems; • Three remote Pentium 3 work stations with monitors and keyboards. 24. The County agrees to lease the foregoing ballot tabulation equipment to the City subject to the following additional conditions: *The City shall utilize the services of Softech to program the system for ballot tabulation of the city election; •The City shall not remove the ballot tabulation equipment from the Collier County Government Center where it is in the Supervisor's custody or take any action which would jeopardize the security of the system or interrupt the custody chain. •The City shall conduct its Logic & Accuracy Test at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the election. •The City shall arrange for its County- approved contract agent to load the election— specific ballot tabulation software onto the County's equipment between the hours of 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. no later than Tuesday, one week before the election. The City shall arrange for storage of its copy of the ballot tabulation program at a site other than the Collier County Government Center. The City's failure to comply with any of these provisions as determined by the Supervisor of Elections shall invalidate this Agreement except for paragraphs 33 and 34 since such action would have implications for subsequent County elections. 25. The Supervisor's office shall be and is solely responsible for the content and format of any affidavits and training materials used in the course of its election. 26. The Supervisor shall be responsible for any training of City's election workers, and the development of its training materials. The City shall be liable for all actions taken by the City's poll workers during the course of its election day. 27. The City shall be responsible for all activity relating to any absentee ballots it chooses to provide voters for its election — including processing requests; addressing absentee envelopes; verification of voter signatures; and providing lists of absentee voters to city candidates subject to the oath requirements of §98.095, Florida Statutes, being filed with and authorized by the Supervisor of Elections. 1 6-K I 28. With the sole exception of the voter registration book closing advertisement, the City shall run proper bilingual advertisements for required election notices in a newspaper of general circulation within the county. 29. The City shall provide the necessary training and personnel on election day to verify absentee voter signatures, open absentee ballots and prepare the voted ballots for actual tabulation. Such work shall be conducted under the rules established by the City Canvassing Board. 30. Except for precinct registers, the City shall be responsible for retention of all election materials and for records destruction once 22 months have lapsed per the Voting Rights Act time frame. 31. With the exception of activities relating directly to the Supervisor's determinations regarding voter registration and eligibility and to the extent permitted by law, the City shall pay for the Supervisor's selection of defense counsel and indemnify and hold harmless the County, the Supervisor of Elections, their officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all actions, in law or in equity, from liability or claims for damages, injuries, losses, and expenses including attorney's fees, to any person or property which may result now or in the future from City's activities associated with this City election, arising out of or resulting from any and all acts of omission or commission relating to the City's election or the City's responsibility under this Agreement. Further, to the extent permitted by law, the City shall pay for the Supervisor's selection of defense counsel and indemnify and hold harmless the County, the Supervisor of Elections, their officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all actions, in law or in equity, from liability or claims for damages, injuries, losses, and expenses, to any person or persons authorized by the City, its employees, or agents to participate in the City election when not otherwise eligible or from events relating expressly to City election activity. 32. All costs, including attorney's fees and court costs, shall be paid by the City for: a. litigation involving payment due to the County or Supervisor and for collection for any judgment recorded against the City, or b. litigation involving the City's election whether brought by an elector, the U.S. Department of Justice, or others. 33. The Supervisor or her staff shall prepare and advertise bilingually the voter registration book closing in accordance with general law and obtain an Affidavit of Publication for same. Said advertisement shall subsequently be billed to the City which shall be responsible for payment. 34. To lease voting units, ballot boxes, and other supplies listed within this contract, the fee shall be $50 per voting unit ($50 x 120 units = $6,000). The fee shall cover replacement parts and shipping necessary to repair any damages to the County's voting unit or equipment leased to the City. In the event the cost of such replacement parts exceeds the amount of the fee, the City shall reimburse the County for the difference. The fee shall be paid to the Supervisor no less than 45 days prior to election day. 35. Within 10 calendar days of the city election date, the City shall provide any replacement parts or equipment that were lost, stolen, or damaged while in the City's possession. 36. If the Supervisor's actual City election costs exceed the amount of the fee, the City shall pay the Supervisor's bill within ten calendar days of its receipt. Rates for the Supervisor's bill shall be actual costs associated with the following: • computer sort time at the rate of $75 per sort: • computer printing at the rate of $.15 per page 16K1 • computer printing at the rate of $.27 per page • actual costs of advertising the voter registration book closing; • actual staff labor costs for work unique and peculiar to the City's election; • actual records retention storage costs at the rate of $.25 per cubic foot of material kept 22 months; • actual costs of containers used to store election related materials @ $5.50 /box; • $.34 for postage on #10 envelopes, or current rate; •$2.32 for certified mail postage, or current rate; •$.0125 per page of county Precinct Register paper used (does not include data processing sorts or printing costs); •$.032 per page of letterhead stationery or current cost; •$.0328 per #10 letterhead envelope or current cost; •$.0348 per #10 window letterhead envelope or current cost; 9$.11 per purchase order or current cost; •$.082 per voucher check or current cost; •$.15 per page for 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" copies; •$.20 per page for duplexed copies; •$1.00 per page for certified copies of available public records; •$15.00 labor costs for each page of letters or documents produced; *actual cost of any expenditures required by the City's election and paid by the Supervisor. 37. Notwithstanding all provisions for payment set forth in this Agreement, Section 101.002(2), Florida Statutes, provides the City shall be responsible for all costs associated with manpower, equipment, postage, and any other City election costs as enumerated in Section 97.021(9), (9) Florida Statutes, whether or not specifically set forth in this Agreement. 38. Nothing in this Agreement relieves the City of its responsibility to develop security procedures for its election. The County and Supervisor of Elections responsibility for security regarding the City's election are limited to those items contained in the attached Exhibit A. 39. The County and the Supervisor of Elections has no liability for costs or expenses or other liability incurred by the City in preparation for this election should the U.S. Department of Justice note an objection in its response to the City Manager's request. Further, should there be a response noting an objection which would delay or prohibit the conduct of the election, the City is not relieved of any related financial obligation owed to the County and Supervisor arising from fees, goods and services, or other costs and expenses whether or not specifically set forth in this Agreement, incurred by the Supervisor up to the time the City notifies the Supervisor in writing of the Department of Justice objection. 40. The City shall obtain an insurance policy which shall name the County as additionally insured or agree to provide coverage through the City's self - insurance and shall assure that the County will have no financial obligation which includes the City's responsibility for paying any deductible for any damages to the County's voting and ballot tabulating equipment and systems used in a City election. The City shall provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance for said coverage or resolution indicating such coverage under the City's self- insurance program. 41. In the event there is an election protest, contest, or sequestration order arising from the City's election involving any component of the County's voting system and/or equipment which would preclude its further use until the matter has been resolved by the courts and the County has an election scheduled where the equipment must be used, the City shall make a $25,000 security deposit to Collier County within four calendar days of the issuance of the sequestration order for the tabulation component and an additional $25,000 if voting units are involved. The unused balance on the security deposit shall be returned to the City when the legal matter has been resolved. 16K1 42. The City shall arrange for candidates, candidate supporters, and members of the press to congregate and await election results in some publicly accessible meeting area such as the County Commission meeting room, City Hall, or other comparable location. Candidates only may be given tours of parts of the secured areas of the Elections Office. The City Canvassing Board, its precinct election workers, its election night workers, and the Elections employee designated with custodial supervision of the facility for the day will be admitted to the secured area for processing. 43. This Agreement shall be valid only for the City election held February 5, 2002. 44. In the event any part of this Agreement is determined to be unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, said ruling shall not invalidate the remaining parts of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto authorize this Agreement, consisting of six consecutively numbered pages plus a one page "Exhibit A" attachment, and affix their hand and seal this day of 2001 by the Naples City Council and this a day of 4D 0—TV ja 2001 by the Collier County Board of Commissioners and Supervisor of Elections. ATTEST!", . „ , Dwigli a t:. Sr6c:k; , ejk Attl atyt>rs � �i+rsiln s AOpro f@�- hd•legal sufficiency for the County, a �Maft�fich Chief Assistant County Attorney ATTEST: Tara Norman, Naples City Clerk p Approved as to form and legal sufficiency for the City: Naples City Attorney Collier County Board of Commissioners Z!, / i �_ _y Supervisor of Elections I nifer J. Ed arcW City of Naples Bonnie MacKenzie, Mayor 16K1 Exhibit A Collier County, Florida §19.1 SECURITY PROCEDURES for Stand Alone Municipal Elections (not scheduled concurrently with state /county dates or mail ballot elections) 1. The Elections Office will advertise the registration book closing. 2. Provide the City with a precinct by precinct demographics report within seven days of registration book closing. 3. On the 6th day preceding election day, the Elections Office will run the computer sort to produce precinct registers for use by the City (not required for mail ballot election). 4. On the 4th day preceding election day, the Elections Office shall deliver the precinct register(s) to the City Clerk no later than 5:30 p.m. (not required for mail ballot election). 5. If the City leases the County's voting equipment (not supplies), permission must be obtained from both the County Commissioners and the Supervisor of Elections for each election date per F.S. 101.36. The City shall provide the County with an itemized list of requested equipment no less than 45 days prior to election. day. The County shall not be required to provide equipment it does not have nor shall it be required to provide all equipment requested. 6. If authorized by the County, the City shall arrange to pick up the leased equipment, prepare it for use in its election, and deliver it to their polling place(s). 7. The City shall return leased County equipment to the Elections Office the day after the election. The equipment shall be in the same condition as when it was received by the city. 8. If the City issues absentee ballots, the Elections Office will, prior to the canvass of votes, provide the City with records access for their verification of voter signatures on absentee ballots brought to the Elections Office by the City. 9. No later than the 2nd day after the election, the City shall deliver to the Elections Office the precinct register(s) organized in ascending precinct order. No later than the 3rd day after the election, the City shall deliver to the Elections Office, the voter affidavits organized in alphabetical order for use to the Elections Office in updating elector records. 10. If the City leases the County's ballot tabulation system, only the Supervisor of Elections security procedures for building and system access shall apply. The City shall be responsible for all other security measures for its procedures and supplies. 11. The Elections Office shall retain the precinct register(s) for twenty-two (22) months and then shall seek Bureau of Archives authorization for destruction. Revised September 2001 ficity%conwe%seauity 1oL 2 +, SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is entered into and made on this 13r1i day of D tu-t-- , 2001, by and between Collier County (the "County ") and Hiwasse, Inc., J. Dudley Goodlette, As Trustee and Individually, Kensington Park Master Association (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Property Owner "), with respect to Circuit Court Case No. 01- 1088 -CA, Collier County v. Hiwasse, Inc. WITNESS ET H: WHEREAS, the County has filed an eminent domain action in the Circuit Court of Collier County, Case No. 01- 1088 -CA, to acquire a perpetual Road Right -of -Way, Drainage, Utility and Maintenance easement in Parcel 175A, and a perpetual slope easement interest in Parcels 575A and 5756, which are more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; WHEREAS, title to these parcels vested in the County upon making a good faith estimate of value on July 16, 2001 in the total amount of $490,200.00; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner has an interest in the parcels acquired by the County; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner and the County desire to resolve all issues pertaining to full compensation, including severance damages, costs to cure, any other damages, and attorneys' fees and costs, relative to the acquisition of Parcels 175A, 575A and 57513, in Case No. 01- 1088 -CA; and 1 6 L 2 WHEREAS, the Property Owner maintains that as a result of the taking the remainder property, or approximately 12 acres, can only be utilized for agricultural uses, thereby causing severance damages in the approximate amount of $400,000; and WHEREAS, the Property Owner seeks an amendment to the future Land Use Element of the County's Growth Management Plan establishing a commercial in -fill district for the remainder property allowing for office and /or indoor storage uses; and WHEREAS, County staff has no objection to the proposed plan amendment but requires a complete review before determining whether it will support the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto recognize the cost and risks involved in the continued litigation and wish to settle all pending claims in this case as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, it is the County's and the Property Owner's desire to reduce their settlement to writing and to be bound by the terms of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and consideration set forth in this Agreement, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the Parties and with the intent to be legally bound hereby, the County and the Property Owner mutually agree as follows: 1. Parties agree that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and said recitals are incorporated by reference into the terms of this Agreement. 2. The County agrees to waive its application deadline and fee and permit the Property Owner to submit a proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan to establish a commercial in -fill district on the remainder property allowing for professional and medical offices and /or indoor storage 2 16L2 uses. The County agrees further that the proposed plan amendment will be reviewed as a non - transmitted comprehensive plan amendment to be considered by the Board of County Commissioners in the current comprehensive plan amendment cycle. The text of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "B ". 3. Staff agrees that within two weeks of the receipt of the supporting documentation from the Property Owner, it shall review the supporting documentation and notify the Property Owner, in writing, as to whether the Staff will: 1) Support the proposed amendment; 2) Support the proposed amendment with certain specific revisions; 3) Will not support the proposed amendment; or 4) Require additional information in order to evaluate the proposed amendment. 3.1 In the event staff will not support the proposed amendment or staff will support the amendment but only with specific revisions that are unacceptable to the Property Owner, then the Property Owner may elect to terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7 below. 3.2 Supporting documentation shall include a limited market study, a limited traffic analysis, a conceptual plan, which will include the depiction of access on Eatonwood Lane, and a survey of the remainder property. However, the County reserves the right to request additional information needed to evaluate the proposed amendment. 3.3 As a condition for staff recommendation, the Property Owner agrees that all 3 access to the remainder property shall be provided via an access connection on Eatonwood Lane. To the extent the current Collier County Access Management Policy will allow it, the Property Owner may apply for a right -in /right -out connection onto Livingston Road. 3.4 The Property Owner acknowledges and agrees that, as a necessary part of the review and adoption process, the proposed amendment must be presented to the Collier County Planning Commission for its recommendation vel non and to the Board of County Commissioners for its ultimate determination as to adoption. 4. The parties acknowledge and agree that Staff recommendations shall be based upon an independent review conducted pursuant to state and local law. 5. The parties expressly acknowledge and agree that the approval or adoption of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment is subject to the Board of County Commissioners' review and approval. Such review shall be conducted pursuant to state and local law. 6. The Property Owner understands that in the event the plan amendment is adopted by the Board, it will be submitted to the Department of Community Affairs ( "DCA ") for review and that by proceeding with a non - transmitted amendment there exists the possibility of a finding of non - compliance by the DCA after adoption of the amendment. In the event the DCA finds that the adopted amendment is not in compliance, the Property Owner agrees to assume responsibility for defending the plan amendment, which may include intervening in an administrative proceeding, participating in a consent agreement, or any other action deemed necessary and appropriate to obtain DCA approval. If the Property Owner elects not to defend the plan amendment against the DCA's Notice of Intent to find the plan amendment not in compliance, the County may 4 16L2 elect to take no further action. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed or interpreted as requiring the County to defend the plan amendment once adopted if the Property Owner fails to participate in the administrative process. In the event the Property Owner chooses not to defend the plan amendment and /or the plan amendment is ultimately found not to be in compliance, the Property Owner may terminate this Agreement pursuant to Section 7 below . 7. The parties agree that in the event the Board of County Commissioners does not approve or adopt the comprehensive plan amendment; or County Staff proposes changes to the proposed amendment which are not acceptable to the Property Owner; or County Staff notifies the Property Owner, in writing, that it no longer supports the amendment; or the DCA funds the plan amendment not in compliance and the Property Owner elects not to defend the plan amendment; or the plan amendment is ultimately found not to be in compliance the Property Owner may elect to terminate this Agreement, in which event the terms of this Agreement shall not be binding on either party. Upon such election by the Property Owner, the parties shall notify the Court and request that pending litigation be placed on the Court's next available trial docket for a jury trial on the matter. The terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be inadmissible for any purpose at the trial in this cause. 8. In the event the Board of County Commissioners approves and adopts the proposed plan amendment, the parties shall effectuate a full and final settlement of the case by obtaining a Stipulated Final Judgment which shall provide for the following: 8.1 The Property Owner shall have and recover from Collier County the sum of FOUR HUNDRED AND NINE THOUSAND, THREE HUNDRED AND 00 /100 DOLLARS 5 16L2': ($409,300.00) for Parcels 175A, 575A and 5756, as set forth below, less any amounts already paid to Property Owner, as full payment for the property interest taken, all damages resulting to the remainder, and all other damages in connection with the taking of these Parcels, including all expert's fees, except a reasonable and necessary appraisal fee: As for Parcel 175A $ 395,400.00 (Land) As for Parcel 575A $ 100.00 (Land) $ 8,600.00 (Improvements) As for Parcel 5756 $ 5,200.00 (Land) 8.2 The Property Owner shall recover reasonable attorney's fees in the amount of EIGHTY THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($80,900.00) as provided under Chapter 73, Florida Statutes. 8.3 In the event the Property Owner has withdrawn the good faith deposit prior to operation of Section 8, the Stipulated Final Judgment shall reflect that the Property Owner has received the full compensation, expert and attorney's fees as set forth above and that no additional payment shall be due and owing from the County except for a reasonable and necessary appraisal fee as provided by s. 73.091, Fla. Stat. 9. The Property Owner represents and warrants to the County that Hiwasse, Inc. owned the subject property as described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto as of July 16, 2001, and continues to own the remainder property as of the execution of this Agreement Hiwasse, Inc., further represents that it will not relinquish or transfer any rights in said property where to do so would hinder its ability to comply with the requirements of this Agreement. 16L2'9 10. This Agreement has been entered into freely and voluntarily by the Property Owner after having been apprised of all relevant information concerning this Agreement and the consequences thereof and after having received advice from its legal counsel, Richard Yovanovich, Esquire. 11. The Property Owner acknowledges and agrees that the terms of this Agreement are subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners at a duly noticed public meeting of the Board and that the terms hereof shall not be binding on any party until formally accepted and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 12. Upon Board approval of this Agreement, the parties shall execute and file a stipulation for continuance of the trial in this matter. The trial shall be continued indefinitely until such time as the Board adopts the proposed plan amendment or the Property Owner elects to terminate this Agreement. 13. The parties agree that this Agreement supersedes and replaces all prior Agreements and understand that it constitutes the entire Agreement between the Property Owner and the County and that there exists no other Agreements, oral or written, between them relating to any of the matters covered by this Agreement or any other matter whatsoever. In executing this Agreement, the Property Owner does not rely upon any inducements, promises, or representations, other than those expressed in this Agreement. 14. The parties expressly acknowledge and agree that this Settlement Agreement represents a negotiated compromise of all issues, damages, claims, and the like arising out of the acquisition of Parcels 175A, 575A and 575B, in Circuit Court Case No. 01- 1088 -CA, and as such is inadmissible to establish fair market value of the property for any purpose. 15. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. VA 16L2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Property Owner and the County have executed this Settlement Agreement consisting of ATTEST', DW16�--E`. I K, Clerk _ i .� �• .. 7 1 Sign'Ad0*' ON Y. Print Name Print Name i ess Print Name pages on the day and year first written above. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAMES CARTER, Ph.D., Chairman Date: / e)`j� d HI ASSE, INC. By: Date: Nj "A %D-/9 - (3 j J. DUDLEY GOODLETTE, as Trustee and Individually J. DUDLEY GOODLETTE Date /C)— / 9-0 16L2 KENSINGTON PARK MASTER ASSOCIATION, 1.`l is Date /0-vi-<3 % Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: / �1116 EL EN T. CHADWELL Assistant County Attorney HAPublic \Litigation \Eminent Domain\OPEN CASES \Livingston lll%Hiwasse\SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT.doc 0j PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE EXHIMT ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY, DRAINAGE, 6 UTILITY dk MAMT. EASEMENT k L PROJECT: NO. PROJECT PARCEL -NO: ITS TAX PARCEL NO. r gZ0831 9 SECTION U TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SKETCH OF RIGHT —OF —WAY PARCEL NOT SURVEY) (SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT —OF —WAY PARCEL) MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2 OF 6 N a IL 3 Ws 7 N� m� 110' a' EASEMENT I FP.&L izEASE! A PG. 311) (O.R. 504. PG u3 n I I 119 I I 20' PROPOSED — UNNGSTON ROADaw 1 � � I 170' FP.dkL. EASEMENT I S (O.R. 642, PQ 31 100' N- 6 SCALE. I' - 100' maw C f75 0° @ a: t7{ I I� I a4{ u3 n I I 119 I I 20' PROPOSED — UNNGSTON ROADaw 1 � � I 170' FP.dkL. EASEMENT I S (O.R. 642, PQ 31 100' N- 6 SCALE. I' - 100' maw C f75 0° @ a: t7{ 42 N 3 Q od' {� 2 I Oa � 18 k= to Y a I ;3, a BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTEM, EASt ZONE PREPARED BY: 1/24/00 BY: M RUB eR a a 25 00 E AGN�U• fi•S•M•. NO. 5335 RUNDAUX,rr 1 8 Ol SCALE: Q Ptot�salomt tnftuNn, OLm�n. ! 4�ud �orw�en DRAWN JAN OAT✓ : NOV. 9. 1990 �° ° + m rw +..err *ti► w.w �N» n «m m ii +o� . PROJECT NO.: 7841 CHECK BY FILE N : 7274 ACAD NO: 7274 -17A I� n a4{ I I �— �— -4- N T - --� -- -J __ - -- — - -- ------ -i - - -1 - -�— - - cd 4 -,'— -- ^ - -- w 42 N 3 Q od' {� 2 I Oa � 18 k= to Y a I ;3, a BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTEM, EASt ZONE PREPARED BY: 1/24/00 BY: M RUB eR a a 25 00 E AGN�U• fi•S•M•. NO. 5335 RUNDAUX,rr 1 8 Ol SCALE: Q Ptot�salomt tnftuNn, OLm�n. ! 4�ud �orw�en DRAWN JAN OAT✓ : NOV. 9. 1990 �° ° + m rw +..err *ti► w.w �N» n «m m ii +o� . PROJECT NO.: 7841 CHECK BY FILE N : 7274 ACAD NO: 7274 -17A 16L2 PROJECT: N0. u PROJECT PARCEL NO: TAX PARCEL NO. SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP ,49 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SKETCH OF RIGHT -OF -WAY PARCH( 07 A SURVEY) (SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT —OF -WAY PARCEL) MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 3 OF 6 N •x 110' I 125' F.P.&L EASEMENT F.P.&L. EASEMENT -. O.R, 184 PQ 205 (QR. 429, PQ J54) N 1 SCALE: i" 100' m 1 of !R I I I I I 20' PROPOSED R.QIlI PROPOSED M.0 IN Z I N U4WOSICW ROAD : I PARCEL 175A y� i Ok ci I ►` rro' I rzd' F.P.Id.. EASEMENT F.P,«L. EASEMENT i 170' F.P.dI.. EASEMENT (QR. 1511 PQ JII ), MR. 504. P0. 4'115) (O.R. 542. PQ 31) I I I8 MATCHUNE SEE SHEET I OF B BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTEM,• EAST ZON . 3;1g0. PREPARED BY: SHE 2 OF 'S Lr 1/24/00 BY 4 8 25 00 ; A Lt. R.S.4. NO: 8335 1111tUR UMAOS40C 1 /8/01 SCA . >' ' !'n(n,Mwl•g11a�+�. Plou"m k Lrd ,w+.rs+ DRAWN : JAN "' YAtE: IJj)V. 9. ta99 CHEC By.—MA PROJECT NO.: 7841 «" r vw .-�w "»• s' wN .r n r.., fu . -wu FILE 0: 7274 ACA6 NO:. 7274 -17B lbl2 PROJECT: NO. PROJECT PARCEL 140: TAX PARCEL NO. SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP „49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SKET H OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PARCEL (NOT A SURVE)L, (SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR DESCRIP17ON OF RIGHT -OF -WAY PARCEL) MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 4 OF 8 N 110' 125' t kF.P.AL. EASEMENT F.P.AL. EASEMENT O.R. 182. PG 205J� (MR. 431, PG 15) I --� I i I I rdf SCALE. 1" - 100' i I,N i 1:; ,, I�, f i f o f I I e a --- - -1 - -- -� I vi i td ° f z �° N Dl h �h ui 120' PROPOSED R.O.W. IL LIUINOSTON ROAD �j k PARCEL 174 A, + N lie ,.j 110' i 125' N $ F.P.41.. EASEMENT F. ,AL. EASEMENT OR. 112. PG 201 (QR. 429, PD. 354) Ira �- N 1930'13" E 20.00 8 +21.04 _- rao aD1 • ,x 20 PROPOSED R.O.W. MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2 OF 8 s 00v9s7' E 11 BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTkQ, EAST 83%90; PREPARED BY: SHE 3 OF 6 NOLI 1 %24/00 BY: RR k 8/25/00 D. AGNOLI, R.S.M. N0, 5335 UNDA6Era 1/8/01 8 ply, k hW ,mwyv� DR Y. JAN DATE. NOV. 9. 1999 ryl.N n a�a a� au CHE BY.- WDA PROJECT NO.: 7841 FIL 7274 ACAO NO: 7274 -17C 16L2 PROJECT: NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO: TAX PARCEL N0. SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP _,49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SKETCH OF RIGHT -OF -WAY PARCEL' (NOT A SURVEYS (SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR DESCRIP710N OF RIGHT —OF —WAY PARCEL) MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 5 OF e N I I I I I l I { I ! 1 i r I ( I I' w ( F.P.&L.1EASEMENT I F.P.&L'EASEAIENT i P.R. 102, PG. 203)1 (QR. 420. PG. .354) 1 i EAST —KST {GNE-- OUARIER SEC71 LINE ' �(L o_ s N L4 w O is 175A K L r 0 0:L W • N MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 3 OF e BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSIM,- EAST PREPARED BY: SH-E iltnosuli 1 24/0 0 BY: 9/28/00 :'A N( AGi o 1/9/01 SCALE. m preladsnnl na�1e�"es, pl�nwn, k Ind ourny m ORAWN JAN samaw..o�ftnwin "w. nk iw s..r.., nw �.w, �.N., n aro ��ra�,.rr -uu CNEC BY: �QS w r" a ��". .ai° ni.,i tuifr"ra FILE 0: 7274 SCALE: i" — 100' 4 Q • 2 w s�. �a f.f 1. r OF /B0. 6 - DATE: Ugy 8. 1998 PROJECT NO.: 7941 ACAD NO: 7274 -17D 16L2 PROJECT. NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO: TAX PARCEL NO. SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP :.;49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SKETCH OF RIGHT —OF —WAY PARCH (NOT A SURVEY) (SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION OF RIGHT —OF —WAY PARCEL) I I lv 275'1 I I D.R. 2487 Pa 1484) c oaaer"` r'9 d I I a I RIGHT - -OF —WAY DEDICATION couNTY PRoJECr No. 50111 o! I PINE RIDGEI ROAD SCALE 1" — 100' I g I Flo, 121' I FP.kL EASEMENT F.P.& f,ASEAII]4f7 0.R. 171, PG, 43J (0.01. 431, P0:• 207) 151' � g N 897"2-w I I 1 �M1 I I I i PR09 DOW.R LINNOSwm ROAD f= 4 I 1 PARCEL 17PA q I 0. I I o IF. M..IEASEIIENT 1 125' i' N I O r0.R. f6Z PG. 203T F.P.AL EASEMENT 41 I I I ( 4 Z MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 4 OF 6 BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTEM, EAST ZON KF, PREPARED BY: SHEET` _ - u 1/24/00 BY. '1 " 11ti'UNDAGUIM BR k 8/25/00 NOLI:,,R,S.M. NO. 8338 p,,,lessimal aughmem plaumm k bwA wneyen SCALE. o ' DRAWN BY DATE: NOV. 9. 1999 1 /$/01 rwwr arb, � ..a ww w. WN t..ir s.o, a..W r.*w. n WIN 04§WT -4181 WAW uu«w:u: i. w�u~i'i�..� o u Iuiiin -u°i CHECKED :DS FILE N PROJECT IJO.. 7741 ACAD N0: 7274 -17E .•ERPEMAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE FA 2 ROAD RIGHT- OF -WA-6, DRAINACM, UTILITY do MAINT. EASEMENT PROJECT: NO. PROJECT PARCEL N0: TAX PARCEL. NO. SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP ,;49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA S-C-RJPIION OF RIG ALL THAT PART OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE EAST 310 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TONNSHIP 49 SOUTH, HANCE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13. THENCE NORTH 0009'57' NEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAO SECTION 14 A DISTANCE OF 2641.14 FEET TO THE EAST ONE — QUARTER CORNER OF.SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00'1$'70' NEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 1319.96 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION KITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THESE LANDS AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2467, PAGE 1483 PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE LEAVNG SAID EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 13. NORTH 8973'42' NEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS A DISTANCE OF 120.01 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY LWE OF SAID LANDS SOUTH 0075'30' EAST 1321.70 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION MTH THE EAST —NEST ONE — QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE SOUTH 00'09'57' EAST 965.52 .FEET TO AN WTMSECRON OF A NORTHERLY LINE OF THOSE LANDS AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2636, PACE 1080, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 69'30'13' EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH' 00'09'57' EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS A DISTANCE OF i6OQ00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION KITH THE SOUIN LINE OF SAID SECTION 13,• THENCE SOUTH 68"3641' EAST ALONG SAM SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 1J, A DISTANCE OF 100.03 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; CONTAINING 10.15 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE ,SYSTEM, EAST Z PREPARED BY: GHEE. - OF .S 11112 8/25/00 BY: k 1/8/01 AGN JI,..R:S, N0. 5335 aAaa,.,a SCA Pnlawleaal ._.,!AUa, Naaa.sa, Y land aur"ye" ORA JAN DATE. NOV. 9. 1999 Gall. NI. TIN Trlrl ten. now Myy�lbN rL N1N tNl nn CHE BY' —WDA PROJECT NO.: 7841 1.. Ow4 ans lIWr4�M Y, k" , 10 NN R = (1Il It ,1NI11 ..,._43iSL_ o�Wrw 1 FI O: 7274 ACAD NO: '7274 -17F o 16L2 P�RF'IeT'U - • . ,••• t.>c.xcL_U31JE SL.OF"@" >E/45�an�T3T" PROJECT: N0. _ PROJECT PARCEL F10: . TAX PARCEL NO. SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP „49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SKETCH OF SLOPE EAS MENT (NOT A SURVEY) (SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR DESCRIPTION OF SLOPE EASEMENT) MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2 OF 3 N f EAST. 910' OF THEI SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE MORTHEASTI QUARTER OF SECTION 13 I I h to ;eiat>t �) Gas 1A I n H�:� tiI 2 an 2 y 110 125' ?gam V BZ PG. 205 4 (O.R. 429. APG. 354) r A i �WW W � SCALE: 1" 100' q. h 5= a n }off yin O 2� S Z- 4 �1; all n in in in rq i x a CO Lz ±116.56 -- -'- N 120' IZ PROPOSED R.O.W. f2D.00 LINNOSTON ROAD PROPOSED f0'— SLOPE EASEMENT �I PARCEL 3736 S �4I � N ^'I'p• 2 N �WW W � SCALE: 1" 100' q. h 5= a EAST =NEST IME- QUARTER SECTI W b �6 }off yin O 2� S Z- 4 �1; - rl rq i EAST =NEST IME- QUARTER SECTI LINE -1 Lz ±116.56 -- -'- aWI IZ f2D.00 mtl �I � �4I � N ^'I'p• 2 ( m, . BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTEM, EgST.:904 0 PREPARED BY: H�E7 ? F .3 11111hAl.e. OLI k 1/5/01 BY: Ail D GNDL. R.S.M. •! pp q, u; oZ q � w i llNDAO>i na SCAVO: Pnlwdowl �a61a��n, pl*onoan, k land onraqucs DRA SAN .. - , p� _... - -pm. • 8;' 2000 awr.. a..a laws. na, aua aw..r s u. *"W = n run u+ as - m CHE Y: NKIA_. PROJECT `NO.i 7841 aal L' a°isenarr : wu:n&.iwN a- u aw -6 a uu ` n raw 4141 i nii FILE 7274 ACA D NO:" 7274 -44A 16L2 PROJECT: NO. PROJECT PARCEL N0: E TAX PARCEL NO. SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP „49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SKETCH OF SLOPE EASEMENT (NOT A SURVEY) (SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR DESCRIPTION OF SLOPE EASEMENT) i I 278'1 N (0.'R. 2407, PG. } 463 C � EXHRIIT B ?a' RIGHT -OF -WAY DEOICATION Q o d COUNTY PROJECT NO. 60111 Xto PINE R6)CEI ROAOD SCALE: 1' 100' 110' 125' I 04 I F.P.d:L. EASEMENT ! F•P,m- EASEMENT (O.R. 171, PC. 433 (O.R. 431, PG. 207) 155, 16 I I . • I I 5 8823'42 "E• �_ 10,00 I 120 I 'j I PROPOSED R.0.1 ? 4 I UWNGSTON ROA CPS a I 4 ( I = ( PROPOSED-10' N SLOPE EASEMENT I I I PARCEL. 5758 I W I I EAST 510' OF THEI SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF t11 7HE NORTHEAST QUARTER'OF SECTION 13 I I I q r� 110' I n F.P.d�l. EASEMENT I 125'�I 1(O R. 162, G. 20* r.P.&L EASEMENT I I 2 EAST 120' Or THE EAST 810 i� •a. a pill 4. MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 1 OF 3 BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTF9, 'EAST' ZOIJt: w3 "Q0.'`. PREPARED 9Y: 'SHEE_T, 2 QF' NOLI 1/a/01 BY: R8)cR k W A R.S.M. NO. •p N 2 _ A IL Oct a r 11 RUNDAtiZAK SCALE: w ': Prola�Ma�1 .o�lo.as,_ pl�oawa, k Mad aurvTon DRAWN BY. ` °.b!{'[1~;_• f`EB: 6: 2000 awv a...tp swr +N. rrw tw.r n 441W 16141 iN 9,11 CHECKED CHECKED B ' PROJECT NO.: 7841 �~.w. , aw.`�"y R � �1•n� FILE NO: ACAD, NO: 7274 - -44R _ 16L2 PROJECT: NO. sonzi PROJECT PARCEL N0: TAX PARCEL NO. SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP..,49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA OF SLOPE EAS ALL THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND ALL THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 23 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 7, KENSINGTON PARK, PHASE ONE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 21, PACES 82 THROUGH 87, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THENCE NORTH 0009'57' WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 0 OF SAID PLAT, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH UNE OF SAID TRACT 0 OF SAID PLAT AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE EASEMENT HEREIN BEINC DESCRIBED; THENCE SOUTH 8900'24" WEST ALONG THE NORTH 'LINE OF SAID TRACT D A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 0 NORTH 0009'57' WEST 7148 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST -WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE NORTH 00'15'30" WEST 1321.83 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION IJ; THENCE SOUTH 8973'42" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH UNE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A UNE THAT IS 120.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL {ITN THE EAST ONE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION IJ; THENCE SOUTH 0015'30" EAST ALONG SAID LINE THAT IS 120.00 FEET NEST OF AND PARALLEL IMTN THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13, A DISTANCE OF 1321.70 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST -NEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE SOUTH 0009'57' EAST 73.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIBED; CONTAINING 13,952 SQUARE FEET OF LAND MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSWM;.E.kST ZWE'83 190. PREPARED BY: S EET•3 Q NOLI 1 8 OT BY: R8>c8 M A Lt, V.S.M. 'up. 5335 SCA RT]ND ►aRr■ DRAWN BY• N� 'T)ATe ' F.,^F9�e 2000 ProNodo■■1 ■o�fe. ■n, pl■morn, k 1■nd wumy■n r.w.r fewer wa. M, 140 s«w.l D.Y, lww >t./M. n u1N w -Ifu CHECKED Y:— �l►�nq P.RtSJ60T': 7841 W 9—%F UM. 111. IW M■6r low"t. r.n �.. A /INI 111 �,.f -UIl I.Nhw .1 u■■n1..u.■ �... o Nu w a aNi/ 7u, �u11in -Ilw FILE NO: • " AGABrN6-. 7274 -448 ... . . 6 . 16L2 MIEPETUAL - Nicx%l mASwomim -r PROJECT: NO. PROJECT PARCEL N0: TAX PARCEL NO. 09226=17a SECTION 13, iuml ;HIM ;49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SKETCH OF SLOPE EASEMENT NOT A SURVEY) (SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR DESCRIP71ON OF SLOPE EASEI4IENT) W N T b 110' 123' j IF.P.3L EASEMENT F.P.&L EASEMENT (OR. 162, Pa 206 (a& 434 PG 16) Ix a <g�N IA 4 in �a c O ( �Iz PARCEL 575A PROPOSED f0'- SLOPE EASEMENT ell, IL T o" t� I . A;L 1E EASEMENT I F^&L.EASEMENT O.R. 162, PR 20Ji (O.R. 426. P0. ]54) t:l 4 N .0 fttllI O � ( N I I P.O,B. �uC +ae.ae I -- y p I _ 120.00 +46,40 •S 6830'02 "W 10.00 1 120' N SCALE. 1" - 100' cli �a N V poO^p� N o�i Ix a <g�N IA 4 in �a c t:l 4 N .0 fttllI O � ( N I I P.O,B. �uC +ae.ae I -- y p I _ 120.00 +46,40 •S 6830'02 "W 10.00 1 120' N SCALE. 1" - 100' cli �a N ,M _d' O U HEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTE6(, -&ST ZONE` BT /9[I,. PREPARED BY: :SHEET :1:''dF I ' HOLI 1/8/01 0Y: _ RBSA k W i R.S, .�.NO. 53 QtiDAOa a. SCALE: Ynhad�l w m, Ltma�, k Lnd "nrw n DRAwN BY: A .A 1 2R ODO s� f ! s� *—ti R" +N. rwr s.r..t WWL n.rw Sol- n wo nt rrrttt - CHECKED .�IiA PROJECT NO.: 7845 w tw v_&W N..a r... v a n NNt Iru Nrntt FILE N0: ACAD NO: 7274 -42 Oa.YAaala V MVaaLaWa Y.a D NN W N NN Tao 1NL YN N Mew � I c O ( ,M _d' O U HEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE SYSTE6(, -&ST ZONE` BT /9[I,. PREPARED BY: :SHEET :1:''dF I ' HOLI 1/8/01 0Y: _ RBSA k W i R.S, .�.NO. 53 QtiDAOa a. SCALE: Ynhad�l w m, Ltma�, k Lnd "nrw n DRAwN BY: A .A 1 2R ODO s� f ! s� *—ti R" +N. rwr s.r..t WWL n.rw Sol- n wo nt rrrttt - CHECKED .�IiA PROJECT NO.: 7845 w tw v_&W N..a r... v a n NNt Iru Nrntt FILE N0: ACAD NO: 7274 -42 Oa.YAaala V MVaaLaWa Y.a D NN W N NN Tao 1NL YN SECTION 13, 16L2 PROJECT: NO. 80071 PROJECT PARCEL NO: �A TAX PARCEL NO. TOWNSHIP .,49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SCRIPT ON OF SLO ALL THAT PMT OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION IX TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE' 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 7. KENSINGTON PARK PHASE ON& ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 21. PAGES 82 INROUGH 87, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLDRIDA, THENCE SOUTH 0009'07' EAST ALONG A• LINE 120A0 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL MTN THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION IA A DISTANCE OF 110.19 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNOt OF THOSE LANDS AS DESCRIBED -IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2934 PACE 1089, PUBLIC RECORDS OF. COWER COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 893D'D2" WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LANDS A DISTANCE OF 10,00 FEET; THENCE LEANNG SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID LANDS NORTH 9009.57' WEST 110.18 FEET TO AN INTERSECAON WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 7: THENCE NORTH 8930.02' EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 7, A DISTANCE OF IGLOO FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNMO OF THE EASEMENT HERON DESCRIBED; CONTAINING IfO2 SQUARE FEET OF LAND MORE OR LESS 30051 BEARING5 ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLAN COORDINATE 9Y37Fd, 'EAST'&NE BJ /90. PREPARED BY: SHEET,2 2 NOL , RBER k 1 8 01 BYa . WA OLI,• R.$TA.', NO. 5335 �2 ■ RUNnAGS.r SCALE'. Pnb■■iewl ■lYlo■ ■n, �1■an■r■, k 1■od ■ mSpr■ DRAWN ,.;:Dj.�;E:, :•aL /G. 25. 2000 a■wr ■...y. wa ■■■. 2'.w r. "."ww. F.,w ■.N.. rL ■r�■■ Nt ■■+ -■tu CHECKED ••r : ' W[] "PROJECT NO.: _ 7841 � �.". aA-Uw .w. ax... u M -4 ■2'"^i ■W � V— (Ni�Fiiii FILE NO: 274 ACAD NO 7224 -42 16L2 Livingston Road /Eatonwood Lane Infill Subdistrict- This subdistrict consists of approximately 11.8 acres at the intersection of Livingston Road and Eatonwood Lane. In addition to uses allowed in the Plan, the intent of the Livingston Road /Eatonwood Lane Infill Subdistrict is to provide professional and medical offices and /or indoor self storage facilities to the surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance. Access to the property within the Subdistrict shall be from Eatonwood Lane and shall be located as far west as reasonably possible. Additional access to the property in the form of a right -in /right -out onto Livingston Road may be allowed where compliant with access management standards. EXHIBIT ... 16L2 The East 510 feet of the Southeast Quarter and the East 510 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter located in Section 13, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida,: Less and except the following from the above described parcel: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Section 13, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida and run North 00 degrees 09 minutes 47 seconds West along the Easterly line of said Section 13 for 2126.61 feet; thence run South 89 degrees 50 minutes 13 seconds West for 120.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continue South 89 degrees 50 minutes 13 seconds West for 390.00 feet; thence run North 00 degrees 09 minutes 47 seconds West for 430.00 feet; thence run North 89 degrees 50 minutes 13 seconds East for 390.00 feet; thence run South 00 degrees 09 minutes 47 seconds East for 430.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. EXHIBIT 16L3 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 16L4 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 16L6 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 16L7 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 • DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: Public Hearing I'Advertisement ( location, etc.) ❑ Other: i Originating Dept/ Div: OMB Person: Mike Smykowski Date: 10 /01 /01 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): Collier County, Florida Proposes to Amend its Fiscal Year 2000 -01 Adopted Budget Petitioner: (Name & Address): Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before: XX BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearing 2 days before hearing.) Tuesday, October 23, 2001 Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): X Naples Daily News ❑ Other ❑ Legally Required Proposed Tent: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Notice of Public Hearing, Collier County, Florida Proposes to Amend Its Fiscal Year 2000 -01 Adopted Budget Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? X Yes ❑ No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 001 - 101520. (.Dqq too Reviewed by: Division Administrator or Designee Date List Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Administrator. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Administrator. The Administrator's office will distribute copies: ❑ County Manager agenda file: to ❑ Requesting Division Clerk's Office ❑ Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: I O / 1 Date of Public hearing: 0 3 —Date Advertised: &%A00 l &I / COUNTY OF COLLIER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSES TO AMEND ITS FISCAL YEAR 2000 -01 ADOPTED BUDGET 17A All interested parties are invited to attend a public hearing on this matter to be held on October 23, 2001, at 9:00 AM or soon thereafter, in the County Commissioners' Boardroom, 3rd Floor, W. Harmon Turner Building (Building F), Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, . Naples, Florida. A copy of the proposed Budget Amendment Resolutions and background material will be available for public inspection on weekdays between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM at the Office of Management and Budget, 2nd Floor, Administration Building. A final decision on the amendments will be made at this meeting. Listed below are the amendments to be considered and their purpose. Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Board of County Commissioners Collier County Florida James D. Carter, Ph.D., Chairman Budget Amend. Fund Change Fund No. No. Fund Title Amount Total 01 -512 413 County Sewer Impact Fees $12,800,000 $49,823,503 PURPOSE: To appropriate transfer from loan proceeds for wastewater plant expansion. 01 -513 410 County Water Sewer Debt Service $12,800,000 $39,316,300 PURPOSE: To appropriate SRF Loan proceeds for wastewater plant expansion. 01 -518 490 EMS $275,659 $12,029,751 PURPOSE: To appropriate carryforward and merit reserve for 800 MHz communication equipment repair and for overtime. 01 -525 001 General $19,091 $160,844,854 PURPOSE: To appropriate revenues for building maintenance special services items. RESOLUTION NO. 01 -BAR- A RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 17 At 129.06(2), FLORIDA STATUTES, TO AMEND THE BUDGET FOR THE 2000 /01 FISCAL YEAR. WHEREAS, Section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes, provides that the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter also referred to as 'Board ") at any time within a fiscal year may amend a budget for that year, and provides the procedures therefor; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, has received copies of budget amendments which provide for but are not limited to: anticipated carry forward, unanticipated revenue, and/or receipts of a nature from a source not anticipated in the budget and received for a particular purpose; appropriations for expenditures in particular funds that should be decreased and other appropriations in the same fund that should be correspondingly increased; appropriations from the reserve for contingencies; appropriations from the reserve for future construction and improvements; and increased receipts for enterprise or proprietary funds received for a particular purpose; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is appropriate to amend the Budget for Fiscal Year 2000/01 by resolution pursuant to Section 129.06, Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the budget amendments to the FY 2000 /01 Budget described below are approved and hereby adopted and the FY 2000/01 Budget is so amended. BUDGET AMENDMENT FUND NUMBERS INCREASE (DECREASE) CARRY FORWARD OR INTERFUND TRANSFERS 413 01 -512 $12,800,000 410 01 -513 490 01 -518 $275,659 001 01 -525 INCREASE INCREASE INCREASE INCREASE (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE) INTERFUND RECEIPT EXPENDITURE RESERVES TRANSFERS $12,800,000 $547,659 $19,091 $19,091 $12,800,000 ($272,000) $12,800,000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to spread this Resolution in full among the minutes of this meeting for permanent record in his office. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATED: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: iro Manalich Chief Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: James D. Carter, Ph.D., Chairman - 1 - .4 -I TO: Pam Perrell LOCATION: Naples Daily News FAX NO.: (941) 263 -4703 COMMENTS: Please advertise the enclosed notice as indicated FROM: Teri Michaels Board Minutes & Records LOCATION: COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE FAX NO: (941) 774 -8408 PHONE NO: (941) 774 -8406 DATE SENT: 10/12/2001 TIME SENT: 9:00 AM # OF PAGES: (Including cover) .3 17 P, October 12, 2001 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND FY 2000/01 ADOPTED BUDGET Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, October 21, 2001, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Teri Michaels, Deputy Clerk P.O. /Account # 001 - 101520 - 649100 l M NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that they serve as the Administrative Assistant To The Publisher of the Naples Daily, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising, being a in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper 1 time(s) in the issue on October 21, 2001. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. ( Signature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me this `h day of October, 2001 (LWJ4 Signature of notary public frr*► Y Donne Chesney My Commission DD0W336 a w Expires September 11, 2006 PUBLIC NOTICE U MAK, Au i n1r. - -- - COUNTY OF 7 CO COLLIER HEARING NOTICE IF PUB COLLIER COUNTY, . LORIDA PROPOSES TO AMEND ITS FISCAL YEAR +r 2000 -01 ADOPTED BUDGET 111 interested parties are invited to attend a public hearing on this matter to be held m October 23, 2001, at 9:00 AM or soon thereafter, in the County Commissioners' 3oardroom, 3rd Floor, W. Harmon Turner Building (Building F), Collier County government center, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples Florida; A copy of the proposed Budget Amendment Resolutions 8:00 AM background nd 5 06 PMratlthell be available for public inspection on weekdays b Office of Management and Budget, 2nd Floor, Administration Building. A final decision on the amendments will be made at this meeting. Listed below are the amendments to be considered and their purpose. Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Board of County ol r County Florida " James D. Carter, Ph.D., Chairman Budget Amend. No. Fund No. Fund Title 01 -512 413 01 -513 410 01 -518 490 01 -525 001 9951 Change Fund Amount Total County Sewer Impact Fees $12,800,000 $49,823,503 PURPOSE: To appropriate transfer from loan'proceeds for wastewater plant expansion. County Water Sewer Debt Service PURPOSE: To appropriate SRF Loan proceeds for wastewater plant ex- pansion. EMS r. PURPOSE: To appropriate carryfor- ward and merit reserve for 800 MHz communication equipment repair and for overtime. General PURPOSE: To appropriate revenues for building maintenance special services items. $12,800,000. $39,316,300 $275,659 $12,029,751 $19,091 $160,844,854 E A o` �f �o EAo �T ,g o= I � 3 un RESOLUTION NO.O1 -BAR- 2001-05 17A A RESOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION 129.06(2), FLORIDA STATUTES, TO AMEND THE BUDGET FOR THE 2000/01 FISCAL YEAR. WHEREAS, Section 129.06(2), Florida Statutes, provides that the Board of County Commissioners (hereinafter also referred to as "Board ") at any time within a fiscal year may amend a budget for that year, and provides the procedures therefor; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, has received copies of budget amendments which provide for but are not limited to: anticipated carry forward, unanticipated revenue, and/or receipts of a nature from a source not anticipated in the budget and received for a particular purpose; appropriations for expenditures in particular funds that should be decreased and other appropriations in the same fund that should be correspondingly increased; appropriations from the reserve for contingencies; appropriations from the reserve for future construction and improvements; and increased receipts for enterprise or proprietary funds received for a particular purpose; and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that it is appropriate to amend the Budget for Fiscal Year 2000/01 by resolution pursuant to Section 129.06, Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the budget amendments to the FY 2000/01 Budget described below are approved and hereby adopted and the FY 2000/01 Budget is so amended. BUDGET AMENDMENT FUND NUMBERS INCREASE (DECREASE) CARRY FORWARD OR INTERFUND TRANSFERS 413 01 -512 $12,800,000 410 01 -513 490 01 -518 $275,659 001 01 -525 INCREASE INCREASE INCREASE INCREASE (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE) (DECREASE) INTERFUND RECEIPT EXPENDITURE RESERVES TRANSFERS $12,800,000 $547,659 $19,091 $19,091 $12,800,000 ($272,000) $12,800,000 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to spread this Resolution in full among the minutes of this meeting for permanent record in his office. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATED: ATTEST: DW.LQ1IfP-'-J�ROCK, Clerk 13eputj� Cler AtUst ai to Chairman's $19hAWO only. 61 App'rr ved as to forindnd legal sufiRipy. Ramiro Manalich Chief Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: James D. er, Ph. ., - 1 - r� COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: R ✓ ✓ ✓Normal legal Advertisement ❑ Other: `� 3 (Display Adv., location, etc.) Originating Dept/ Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./ Engineering Services Person: Rick Grigg Q«w GrzrGv� CoS17-573 J Date: September-26, 2001 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): AVPLAT200 I -AR 1365 (Collier's Reserve Lots 45 & 46, Block B) Petitioner: (Name & Address): John Jassy 895 Turtle Court Naples, Fl. 34108 (owner and agent) Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) 1) See list of adjacent owners. Hearing before ✓ ✓ ✓ BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: OCTOBER 23, Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): ✓ ✓ ✓ Naples Daily News Other 2001 ✓ ✓ ✓ Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: PETITION AVPLAT2001- AR1365 TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A PORTION OF A 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 45 AND 46, BLOCK `B ", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF "COLLIER'S RESERVE ", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 59 THROUGH 87, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: NONE Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? ✓ ✓ ✓ Yes ❑ No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: For Advertising costs, charge to: P.O. 912501 For Recording costs, charge to: 113- 138312- 649030 Reviewe 14-;Av Approved by: County Manager Date List Attachments: 1) RESOLUTION WITH EXHIBIT "A" 2) LIST OF ADJACENT OWNERS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ✓ ✓ ✓ County Manager agenda file: ✓ ✓ ✓ Requesting Division ✓ ✓ ✓ Original to Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONL / r� / /a/% Date Received: Z/ / Date of Public hearing: �b Date Advertised: 1� RESOLUTION NO. 2001- RESOLUTION FOR PETITION AVPLAT2001- AR1365 TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A PORTION OF A 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 45 AND 46, BLOCK "B ", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF "COLLIER'S RESERVE ", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 59 THROUGH 87, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 177.101, Florida Statutes, John Jassy, Owner and Petitioner, does hereby request the vacation of a portion of the platted 10' wide Utility Easement on Lots 45 and 46, Block "B ", according to the plat of "Collier's Reserve ", as recorded in Plat Book 20, Pages 59 through 87, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider vacating said portion of the platted 10' wide Utility Easement located on Lots 45 and 46, Block `B ", according to the plat of "Collier's Reserve ", as more fully described below, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required by law; and WHEREAS, the granting of the vacation will not adversely affect the ownership or right of convenient access of other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following portion of the 10' wide platted Utility Easement is hereby vacated: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, and to make proper notation of this vacation on the recorded plat as referenced above. This Resolution is adopted this majority vote favoring same. DATED: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal ciency: I A Patrick G. White, Esq. Assistant County Attorney day of , 2001, after motion, second and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA James D. Carter, Ph.D., Chairman 176 EXHIBIT "A" SHEET I OF 1 ♦O12CC A V Y LP►1 Lw � -�+,� s.i..+ yam- ip, ac I r /LATiW tpt Oat � ` 4 < N ^ i! Shill AIR" fit MOR CA LAJ M « a � S flifiZ l Mi I IN, II I gig. -� G O,uu ca iced ww►do 09/05/2001 13:42 9415667708 JASSY LIST OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS AVPLAT2001- AR1365 PAGE 02 17B . t.." 5 M s T 1 ,;= S ** NAME -LEGAL -NOTES ING /ENTRY /CHANGE ** (N) ** RES471 FC [2 ] OC (SF] FOLIO [271850046031 ,.. ID - -> [27185004603] ( 1 MSG - ADDRESS - ^ ^ ^ ^ ^.........(U]< -TYPE (U F N) TYPE[T] TO[ ] OWNER..[DAVIS TR, JEFFREY DEFOREST ] (B U S H M - 2 ... [JEFFREY DEFOREST DAVIS REV /TR 1 D R W T X Y Z) - 3 ... [UTD 7/19/90 ] - 4...[12207 COLLIERS RESERVE DR ] FGN: CITY PR -5 ... [ ] [IV] < -PC OWN US: CITY-ST-ZIP ... [NAPLES ][FL] [34110][0911] FGN: COUNTRY.......[ ] [ ] <- - - -FGN MAILGD TRS >[481[25][22][229900] <SCN TP> 01 [ Bl[ 411< -BB LU FOR STRAP... LEGAL 1.[COLLIER'S RESERVE ] BLOCK /LOT FOR SUBD .[BLK B LOT 41 ] BLDG /UNIT FOR CONDO 3. ] PAR -NUM FOR ACRG MR -SALE 4.[ ][ ] < -LE D[17]MY[ 80O]BK[2711]PG[1995]TR[ 0]$[ 759,100]V(V)VI[I]TD[WD ]NP[ 11BY[ ] N 1.[ ] EXEMPT :FLAGS OE2.[ ] HX AX WX:SP HO SL IV T 3.[ l [O] (OHON 11 l [ *l [Yl PG /ITM 9859 / 3 WW 20 WK -MDY 102400 BY NLB EI 0000 EY 00 PN 00000000000 20 LU 01 EX i CF[ ] Esc F1 Exit Update Date: 08/16/2001 Time: 10:15:16 176 ' �j 1-1 E E.T Z of 5 ** NAME - LEGAL -NOTES INQ /ENTRY /CHANGE ** (N) ** RES471 FC [2 ] OC [NR] FOLIO [27185004629] ... ID - -> [27185004629] [ ] MSG - ADDRESS - ^ ^^^^.........[U]< -TYPE (U F N) TYPE[B] TQ[ ] OWNER..[TOUSSEL HOMES INC ] (B U S H M - 2...[6017 PINE RIDGE ROAD EXT # 255] D R W T X Y Z) -3 ... [ ] -4 ... [ l FGN: CITY PR -5...[ ] [BS] < -PC OWN US: CITY-ST-ZIP ... [NAPLES ][FL] [34119][3956] FGN: COUNTRY.......[ ] [ ] <- - - -FGN MAILCD TRS >[48][25][22][229900] <SCN TP> 01 [ B][ 42] < -BB LU FOR STRAP... LEGAL 1.[COLLIER'S RESERVE ] BLOCK /LOT FOR SUBD 2.[BLK B � ] BLDG /UNIT FOR CONDO 3.[ ] PAR -NUM FOR ACRG MR -SALE 4.[ ][ ] < -LE D [28]MY[1200]BK[2758]PG[2526]TR[ 0]$[ 215,000]V[V]VI[V]TD[WD ]NP[ 1]BY[ ] N 1.[ ] EXEMPT :FLAGS OE2.[ ] HX AX WX:SP HO SL IV T 3.[ ] [Ol[O][Ol[ ][ l[ *][ ] PG /ITM 9859 / 4 WW 24 WK -MDY 61501 BY KEY EI 0000 EY 00 PN 00000000000 24 LU 00 EX 1 CF[ ] Esc F1 Exit Update Date: 08/16/2001 Time: 10:15:26 179 .. �H EF--r ** NAME - LEGAL -NOTES INQ /ENTRY /CHANGE ** (N) ** RES471 FC [2 ] OC [NR] FOLIO [27185004645] •• ID - -> [27185004645] [ ] MSG - ADDRESS - ^^^^ ^...••••..[U] <-TYPE (U F N) TYPE[M] TQ[ ] OWNER..[FA000NNEAU, GUY =& KITTY ] (D R W T X Y Z) - 2...[1789 IVY POINTE CT ] -3 ... [ ] -4 ... [ l FGN: CITY PR -5...[ ] [JR] < -PC OWN US: CITY-ST-ZIP ... [NAPLES ][FL] [34109][3376] FGN: COUNTRY.......[ ] [ ] < - -- - FGN MAILCD TRS >[48][25][22][229900] <SCN TP> 01 [ B][ 43] <BBOCLUFORF STRAP.. LEGAL 1.[COLLIER'S RESERVE l 2.[BLK B L0� l BLDG /UNIT FOR CONDO 3 [ ] PAR -NUM FOR ACRG MR -SALE 4.[ ][ ] < -LE D[25]MY[ 500]BK[2679]PG[2484]TR[ 0]$[ 225,000]V[V]VI[V]TD[CORPD]NP[ 1]BY[ ] N 1 [ ] EXEMPT :FLAGS OE2.[ ] HX AX WX:SP HO SL IV T 3.[ ] 10110][011 ][ ][ *][ ] PG /ITM 9859 / 5 WW 20 WK -MDY 81800 BY KEY EI 0000 EY 00 PN 00000000000 20 LU 00 EX 1 CF[ ] Esc F1 Exit Update Date: 08/16/2001 Time: 10:15:36 09/05/2001 13:42 9415667708 JASSY PAGE 03 17B Date: 08/16/2001 Time: 10:15:41 ** NAME -LEGAL -NOTES INQ /ENTRY /CHANGE ** (N) ** RES471 FC [2 ] OC [NR] FOLIO (27185004661) ID - -> [27186004661] [ MSG - ADDRESS " " " ^ ^.........[U]< -TYPE (U F N) TYPE[S] TQ[ ] OWNER..[GAST, GAIL N ] (B U S H M - 2 ... [268 LADUE LAKE DR ] D R W T X Y Z) -3...[ 3 -4 ... ( ] FGN: CITY PR -5...[ ] [IV] < -PC OWN US: CITY-ST-ZIP ... (SAINT LOUIS ][MO] [63141][7452] FGN: COUNTRY.......[ ] [ ] <- - - -FGN MAILGD TRS >[48][25 }[22][229900] <SCN TP> 01 [ 8][ 44] < -BB LU FOR STRAP... LEGAL 1.(CO IER'S RESERVE ] BLOCK /LOT FOR SUBD ] BLDG /UNIT FOR CONDO 2 LK B LOT 4 ] PAR -NUM FOR ACRG 3.[ MR -SALE 4.[ ][ D[31]MY[ 300]BK[2657jPG[1933]TR[ O]$[ 224,000]V[V]VI[V]TD[WD ] < -LE ]NP[ 1]BY[ ] ] EXEMPT :FLAGS N 1,[ ] HX AX WX:SP HO SL IV OE2.[ ] [0][0][0][ ][ ][ *][ ] T 3.[ ^ A PG /ITM 9559 / 5 WW 20 WK -MDY 50300 BY NLB EI 0000 EY 00 PN 00000000000 20 LU 00 EX 1 CF[ ] Esc F1 Exit Update Date: 08/16/2001 Time: 10:15:41 17B 4,w E.e-r- 5 aI= 5 FC 2 OC NR ID 27185003756 27185003963 FOLIO 27185003756 OWNER> COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOC INC CERTIFIED STRAP 2299000106 13A22 1055 CROSSPOINTE DR ORB /P 2754 / 1114 COLLIER COUNTY, FL SALE DATE 14 1200 -TAX ROLL - $AMT ACRES NAPLES FL 34110 0930 AREA NA TRS -> 48 25 22 CERT- 00 -VAL PRELIM -2001 LEGAL -1 COLLIER'S RESERVE 0 LND $ 200 200 -2 TRACT 01 -06 L -USE IMP $ -3 MKT $ 200 200 -4 ASSD $ 200 200 CURRENT -EX -AMT TAXABLE $ 200 200 HMSTD -X $ MILL -CODE 100°6 -X $ 169 CNTY $ 0.71 MSTU $ 0.17 SR -X $ S -SL $ 1.03 WMB $ 0.12 DIS -X $ MILL -RATE S -LB $ 0.51 ISD $ 0.23 BLD -X $ 13.8877 CITY $ VADP $ 0.01 WID -X $ -2000 - AG-X $ FINAL (2000 TAXES) TOTAL $ 2.78 WH -X $ -CERTIFIED - LOCATION NA 229900 RES477 Esc Fl Exit Update 17 B '" September 28, 2001 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: AVPLAT2001- AR1365(Collier's Reserve Lots 45 & 46) Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, October 7, 2001, and again on Sunday, October 14, 2001, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk P.O. /Account # P.O.912501 a NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on October 23, 2001, in the Boardroom, 3" Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AVPLAT- 2001- AR1365, John Jassy, Owner and Petitioner, requesting to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County's and the public's interest in a portion of a 10' wide Utility Easement on Lots 45 and 46, Block "B ", according to the plat of "Collier's Reserve ", as recorded in Plat Book 20, Pages 59 through 87, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISISONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 172 ..° Ellie J. Hoffman To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: Petition AVPLAT-2001 -AR1 365 Hi Pam, Please advertise the above as noted on the attached. Thank you. Ellie AVPLAT2001 -AR13 AVPLAT2001 -AR13 65.doc 65.doc Ellie J. Hoffman 17 B ""'Is From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 12:43 PM To: Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: Delivered: Petition AVPLAT-2001 -AR1 365 i Petition ,VPLAT- 2001 -AR136 <<Petition AVPLAT- 2001- AR1365>> Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com' Subject: Petition AVPLAT- 2001- AR1365 Sent: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:45:37 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Fri, 28 Sep 2001 12:43:25 -0400 1 179 September 28, 2001 Mr. John Jassy 895 Turtle Court Naples, F1. 34108 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AVPLAT2001- AR1365 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 23, 2001, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 7, 2001,and again on Sunday, October 14, 2001. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure o�gt1E CIRCGlT COMy Dwight E. Brock Clerk September 28, 2001 Dear Property Owner: County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101 -3044 179 ' CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition AVPLAT2001- AR1365 Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 23, 2001, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 7, 2001 and again on Sunday, October 14, 2001. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Naples Daily News Naples, F" 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHRIS HORION PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101 -3016 REFERENCE: 001230 912501 58332125 AVPLAT2001- AR1365 NO State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared Angela Bryant, who vn oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising -was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Maples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said CoLLier County, Florida, each day and has becn entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Napes, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discour .- ebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 10/07 10/14 AD SPACE: 96.000 INCH FILED ON: 10/15/01 Signature of Affiant _ Sworn to and Subscribed Personally known by me me this of�_ 200' Qyde' cronna Chesney My Comrniman DD056336 • Expires september 17B 011dIrq, , Collier .. Cawrdy Government Center, 3301 East Tamlaml Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consid- er Petition AVPLAT- 2001-AR1365 John Jassy, Owner and Paloner, re- questing to disclaim, re- nounce and vacate the County's rt In a the ioo public's 10' wide UHlltv Easement on Lots 45 and 46 Block "B" accordsrq to %e plot of rCollier's Reserve", as recorded In Plat Book 20, Pages 59 through 87, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. NO 441- Persons wishing to speak on any agenda Ifem must regis- ter with the County Ad- i ministrator prior to pre - sentation of the agenda Hem to be addressed. In- dividual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an Individual to speak on behalf of an organiza- tion or group Is encour- aged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesper- son for a group or orga- nization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an Item. Persons wishing to hove written or graphic materials Included In the Board agenda packets must submit sold materl- al a minimum of 3 weeks prior to' the respective' public hearing. In any case, written materials Intended to be consid- ered by the Board shall be submitted to the op- propriate County staff a Board will Warne a per- manent part of the re- c Any person who decid- es to appeal a decision of the Board will need a re- cord of the proceedings S taining thereto and refore mat need to ure float a verbatim ord of the proceed- ings Is made, which re- cord includes the testi- mony and evidence upon which the appeal is ow E Retn: 2876664 OR: 2913 PG: 3034 CLARK TO THH BOARD RECORDED in the OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL RBC FHB 10,50 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 10/24/2001 at 01 :52FN DWIGHT H. BROCK, CLERK SIT 7240 RESOLUTION NO. 2001- 411 RESOLUTION FOR PETITION AVPLAT2001- AR1365 TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN A PORTION OF A 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON LOTS 45 AND 46, BLOCK "B ", ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF "COLLIER'S RESERVE ", AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 59 THROUGH 87, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOCATED IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 177.101, Florida Statutes, John Jassy, Owner and Petitioner, does hereby request the vacation of a portion of the platted 10' wide Utility Easement on Lots 45 and 46, Block "B ", according to the plat of "Collier's Reserve ", as recorded in Plat Book 20, Pages 59 through 87, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider vacating said portion of the platted 10' wide Utility Easement located on Lots 45 and 46, Block `B ", according to the plat of "Collier's Reserve ", as more fully described below, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required by law; and WHEREAS, the granting of the vacation will not adversely affect the ownership or right of convenient access of other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the following portion of the 10' wide platted Utility Easement is hereby vacated: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, and to make proper notation of this vacation on the recorded plat as referenced above. MThis Resolution is adopted this day of , 2001, after motion, second and majority'votefavoring same. DATED: ,�. AV, ,2,ow ATTEST -" BOARD OF COUNTY CONWISSIONERS WIGHT �PBROCK Clerk COLLIER Y FL • BY: De uty Clerk Jamo. Carter, Ph.D., Chairman Attest " to Cki MW, I $tern alto Approved as to form and legal zq I wl�l Patrick G. White, Esq. Assistant County Attorney L s. y * ** OR: 2913 PG: 3035 * ** 17 B EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 1 OF 1 ,1« v6 - _--__- --. 1 ,i �f�pO y -� at s�1 Y4 RB bl Mf 1 i N W As M a z A �g � Y a=. a el e4a'�u � 1,111 Net. w wroa COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQU T OR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Boar : P ase place the following as a: x Normal legal Advertisement ❑Other: 17C (Display Adv., location, etc.) "1° Originating Dept/ Div: County Attorney's Office Person: David C. Weigel, County Attorney Date: 10 /02 /01 Brief Description: Adoption of the General Advisory Boards Ordinance Petitioner: (Name & Address): Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before x BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearin 10 , ys before hearing.) 10/23/01 Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): x Naples Daily News ❑ Other ❑ Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size): ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR CREATION AND REVIEW OF COUNTY BOARDS AND PROVIDING FOR A POLICY DECLARATION; PROVIDING DEFINTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF NEW BOARDS; PROVIDING EXEMPTION; PROVIDING QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP; PROVIDING PROCESS OF APPOINTMENT; PROVIDING TERMS OF OFFICE; PROVIDING ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENT; PROVIDING SCHEDULE FOR REVIEW OF BOARDS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 86 -41, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? x Yes ❑ No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 001- 010510- 649110 Reviewed by: David Weigel, County Attorney Division Head List Attachments: Ordinance /t%tv a --e)/ Date Approved by: County Administrator Date 17C ORDINANCE NO. 2001- ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR CREATION AND REVIEW OF COUNTY BOARDS AND PROVIDING FOR A POLICY DECLARATION; PROVIDING DEFINTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF NEW BOARDS; PROVIDING EXEMPTION; PROVIDING QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP; PROVIDING PROCESS OF APPOINTMENT; PROVIDING TERMS OF OFFICE; PROVIDING ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENT; PROVIDING SCHEDULE FOR REVIEW OF BOARDS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 86 -41, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Policy Declaration. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to promote economy, efficiency and improve service in the transaction of the public business by County Boards. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to prohibit or restrict the County Commission from amending or abolishing, at any time, any Board currently in existence or thereinafter created. SECTION TWO: Definitions. The term "Board" is defined to include every agency, advisory board, regulatory board, quasi - judicial board, committee, task force or any other group created and funded in whole or in part by the Board of County Commissioners. The term "Commission" is defined as the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. The term " Exempt" is defined to include Ad -Hoc Study Committees appointed by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners for a duration of not more than one (1) year and created to serve a specific short term function. SECTION THREE: Creation of New Boards. A. All Boards created after the effective date of this Ordinance shall be created by ordinance only, except for Ad -Hoc Study Committees that fall under the definition of exempt. Such ordinance shall set forth the Board's purpose; functions; powers; responsibilities; jurisdiction; membership requirements and restrictions; terms and conditions of appointment to and removal from the Board; and the specific staff support, if any, necessary to prepare an annual report, either oral or written, to be presented to the Commission. B. Prior to the advertised public hearing held for the adoption of said ordinance, the County Manager shall submit to the Commission a report setting forth following information concerning the proposed new Board: 17 ''. 1) Whether the establishment of the board will create sufficient betterment to the community to justify the Commission's delegation of a portion of its authority. 2) Whether another Board, either public or private, already in existence, could serve, or is serving the same purpose. 3) The costs, both direct and indirect, of establishing and maintaining the new Board. 4) Whether creation of the new Board is necessary to enable the County to obtain state or federal grants or other financing. 5) Whether the Board should have bonding authority. 6) Whether creation of a new Board is the best method to achieve the benefit desired. SECTION FOUR: Exemption. The Commission may, by resolution, appoint an Ad -Hoc Study Committee for a specific project, if the duration of the Ad -Hoc Study Committee does not exceed one (1) year duration. The resolution must set forth the duties and responsibilities of the Committee and contain language that automatically dissolves the Committee within 1 year from the date of adoption by the Commission. SECTION FIVE: Qualifications and Requirements for Membership on Boards. All members of County Boards shall be permanent residents and electors of Collier County and should be reputable and active in community service. In addition, all Board members should have demonstrated an interest in the activity or service, which is the purpose of the Board. Any member of a County Board who ceases to be a resident of Collier County during his or her term of office shall immediately advise the Commission of such change in status. Upon such notice, the Commission shall declare the position to be vacant and shall promptly fill same pursuant to the provisions of Section Six, herein. The Commission's primary consideration in appointing Board members shall be to provide the Board with the technical, professional, financial, business or administrative expertise necessary to effectively accomplish the Board's purpose. Categories of expertise referenced by County Boards' Ordinances as qualifications for Board membership are considered to be primarily directory and not mandatory. No person shall serve on more than two County Boards simultaneously. If application is made for service on a third Board, the applicant must resign simultaneously from one of his or her current Board positions, or the application for a third Board shall be disqualified. This provision, however, may be waived to allow for service on additional Boards provided the Commission votes unanimously to waive such provision. No member of any County Board shall become a candidate for an elective political office and continue to serve on such Board during his or her candidacy. Should any County Board member become a candidate for an elective political office, such candidacy shall be deemed a tender of resignation from such Board and the Board PA 17C members shall immediately advise the Commission of said resignation. The Commission shall, as soon as practicable after such resignation, declare the position to be vacant and shall promptly fill same pursuant to the provisions of Section Six of this Ordinance. The Board member shall not serve at any meetings after his or her position has been declared vacant by the Commission. The commencement of a legal challenge by a Board member as a plaintiff in a lawsuit against Collier County shall constitute a conflict of interest with Collier County and shall be deemed a tender of resignation from such Board. The County Board member's position shall automatically be considered vacant and the Commission shall promptly fill same pursuant to the provisions of Section Six, herein. No member of any County Board, as defined herein, shall print or create, or have printed or created, or use or distribute any business or informational card depicting the County logo or in any way representing such Board member as a representative of Collier County or as a County Board member. The County Manager or his or her designee may, upon request and prior approval in writing, authorize the County Board members to obtain a County photo identification card identifying such members as a County advisory Board member. SECTION SIX: Process of Appointment. A. Vacancies occurring on any Board shall be publicized, but need not be advertised, in a publication of general circulation within the County, and vacancy notices are to be posted in the County libraries and the County Government Center. B. Prior to making appointments to Boards, the Commission's staff shall provide the Commission with a list outlining the qualifications and demographic background of each candidate for Board membership, along with a list detailing the qualifications and demographic backgrounds of present members seeking reappointment on each board to which an appointment is being made. SECTION SEVEN: Term of Office. A. Terms of office shall be staggered. B. Terms of office for Board members shall be limited to two consecutive terms of service on any one Board; provided, however, that appointment of a Board member to an initial term of one year shall not be considered a "term of office" for purpose of the limitations set forth in this Section, and such members shall be entitled to serve two additional terms if so appointed. C. Appointments to fill a vacancy for the remainder or balance of a term of office shall be considered a term of office for the purpose of the limitations set forth in Section Seven B, above, only if the remainder of the term to be served exceeds fifty percent (50 %) of the full term. D. By unanimous vote of the Commission, the limitations set forth in Sections Seven B and C above may be waived. E. Nothing set forth in this Section shall prohibit any individual from being reappointed to a Board after a hiatus of two (2) years. 3 17C "- F. All members of Boards created by the Commission shall serve at the pleasure of the Commission and may automatically be removed by a majority vote of the quorum of the Commission. SECTION EIGHT: Attendance Requirement. It is the intent and strong desire of the Commission that there be full attendance of advisory Board members at all meetings of the Boards, recognizing, however, that it may be necessary for Board members to be absent from a meeting due to unusual or emergency circumstances. Nevertheless, full attendance at Board meetings is encouraged and necessary for the proper operation of the Boards and in furtherance thereof the following requirements are established: A. Any Board member who is absent for more than one -half of the Board's meetings in a given fiscal year shall be deemed to have tendered his or her resignation from such Board. The Commission shall, as soon as practicable after such resignation, declare the position to be vacant and shall promptly fill same pursuant to the provisions of Section Six herein. The Board members shall not serve at any meetings after his or her position is declared vacant by the Commission. B. In the event that any Board member is absent from two consecutive meetings without a satisfactory excuse acceptable to the Board chairperson, the Board chairperson shall state such fact at the next regularly scheduled Board meeting and shall thereafter notify, in writing, the Administrative Assistant to the Commission of the Board member's failure to attend without a satisfactory excuse. The Commission shall review the Board chairperson's notification at the Commission meeting and shall declare the Board member's position to be vacant if the Commission concurs that the Board member was absent from two consecutive Board meetings without a satisfactory excuse, and shall promptly fill same pursuant to the provisions of Section Six herein. The Board member shall not serve at any meetings after his or her position is declared vacant. C. A member of a Board shall be deemed absent from a meeting when he or she is not present during at least seventy five percent (75 %) of the meeting. SECTION NINE: Review of Boards. Each Board shall be reviewed in the following manner: A. Boards shall be reviewed every four (4) years from the year the Board was first established. B. On or before January 15th of the year in which a Board is to be reviewed, its Chairperson shall submit to the County Manager a report setting forth the following information regarding the Board: 1.) Whether the Board is serving the purpose for which it was created. 2.) Whether the Board is adequately serving current community needs. 3.) A list of the Board's major accomplishments for the preceding twelve month period. 4 17C 4.) Whether there is any other Board or agency, either public or private, which is serving or would better serve the purpose for which the Board was created. 5.) Whether the ordinance creating the Board should be amended to allow the board to more adequately serve the purpose for which it was created. 6.) Whether the Board's membership requirements should be modified. 7.) The cost, both direct and indirect, of maintaining the Board. C. On or before February 15th of the year in which a Board is to be reviewed, the County Manager shall deliver to the Commission the report submitted by the Chairperson of each Board, pursuant to Section Nine (B) of this Ordinance, together with any recommendation or comments the County Manager may have. In order to assist the County Manager and the Commission in the evaluation of the Chairperson's report, the County Manager and Commission may review applicable minutes of meetings of the Boards. All Boards shall be required to forward the minutes of all Board meetings to the Commission in a timely manner. D. During March of the year in which a Board is to be reviewed, the Chairperson shall make an oral presentation to the Commission. Said presentation shall be based upon the report submitted to the County Manager pursuant to Section Nine (B) of this Ordinance. At the conclusion of said oral presentation any Commissioner may request the formation of a subcommittee consisting of three (3) members of the Commission. Said subcommittee shall evaluate the Chairperson's report, the County Manager's recommendations and any other information it deems relevant to determine whether the Board shall continue in its present form. The subcommittee shall report to the Commission not later than within ninety (90) days after their initial meeting. E. At the conclusion of this review process, the Commission shall determine whether to abolish, continue, consolidate or modify the Board for the ensuing four years. SECTION TEN: Repeal of Ordinance No. 86 -41, As Amended. Collier County Ordinance No. 86 -41, as amended by Ordinance No. 92 -44, 98 -46, and 2000 -24, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION ELEVEN: Conflict and Severability. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION TWELVE: Inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word 'ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. All references in the E 17C Code of Laws and Ordinances to Ordinance No. 86 -41 and its amendments shall be changed to reflect the number assigned to this Ordinance. SECTION THIRTEEN: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been filed with the Secretary of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of October, 2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk a Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel County Attorney h: public /kay /ordinances BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. By: JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., Chairman on 4 17 October 2, 2001 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Standards for County Boards Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Friday, October 12, 2001 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: 001 - 010510 - 649110 17C NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Harmon Turner Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR CREATION AND REVIEW OF COUNTY BOARDS AND PROVIDING FOR A POLICY DECLARATION; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF NEW BOARDS; PROVIDING EXEMPTION; PROVIDING QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP; PROVIDING PROCESS OF APPOINTMENT; PROVIDING TERMS OF OFFICE; PROVIDING ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENT; PROVIDING SCHEDULE FOR REVIEW OF BOARDS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 86 -41, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 17C "' JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 17C Ellie J. Hoffman To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: Policy Standards for County Boards Good Morning, Pam, Please advertise the above as indicated on the attached. Thanks and have a great day! Ellie Policy County Policy County Boards.doc Boards.doc �a Ellie J. Hoffman From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 8:48 AM To: Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: Delivered: Policy Standards for County Boards I Dolicy Standards for County Bo... «Policy Standards for County Boards» Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com' Subject: Policy Standards for County Boards Sent: Wed, 3 Oct 2001 08:50:14 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Wed, 3 Oct 2001 08:47:54 -0400 1 day and has been entered as second class mail F( matter at the post office in Naples, in said 0 Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year PF EF next preceding the first publication of the Cq attached copy of advertisement; and affiant Ordw further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any ton., discount, rebate, commission or refund for the are purpose of securing this advertisement for ON( publiction in the said newspaper. fa PUBLISHED ON: 1012 mint sent Item divk Ilmll MY an I beh AD SPACE: 122.000 INCH roe or FILED ON: 10/12/01 +_ ---- ------ --- - - - --- mar - - - -- I - --y'r---- -- - - - - -- - - - - --- - a t Signature of Affiant 0 / Sworn to and Subscribed before me this day of Personally known by me ........... Nancy Er '•_� := MY COMMISSION # CC July 18, 21 ' BONDED THRU FAW RECEIVED Ex RES NCE c. c. 17C Of the All persons speak on any n must regis- . Couniv ad- sen Oat jW to speak on an orbanizaRlon a nnmmu w a prior to respective public hearing. In any case, wrtiten moteriais in- tended to be considered by the Board sholl be sub - mlMed to the WW rlate County staff a minimum of van days prior to the public hearIM All materi- al used In Ovsentatlons before the Board will be- come a permanent part of mAn meson who derid- es to appeal a dedslon of the Board. will raW-q, re• CONS�F Naples Daily News N N0 f Naples, FL 34102 a aR, Affidavit of Publication ( (Hoofer Naples Daily News _ m ment, -------------------------- -------------------------- ---- -- --- -- ------ - - - - -- +- T count) will r rl Itlet c nonce. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS c cornmi CHRIS HORTON O Ordnc Po Box 413016 0 R NAPLES FL 34101 -3016 0 R REV BOA VIDI CY PRC REFERENCE: 001230 0010105106491 N NEV 58330347 NOTICE OF INTENT TO VID State of Florida C CA County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally M MC appeared Phil Lewis, who on oath says that he A API serves us the Editor and vice President of the VIE Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published a AT attached copy of advertising was published in said F FQ newspaper on dates listed. s so News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said p Collier County, F F4 published in said Collier County, Florida, each F FC Bli Signature of Affiant 0 / Sworn to and Subscribed before me this day of Personally known by me ........... Nancy Er '•_� := MY COMMISSION # CC July 18, 21 ' BONDED THRU FAW RECEIVED Ex RES NCE c. c. 17C Of the All persons speak on any n must regis- . Couniv ad- sen Oat jW to speak on an orbanizaRlon a nnmmu w a prior to respective public hearing. In any case, wrtiten moteriais in- tended to be considered by the Board sholl be sub - mlMed to the WW rlate County staff a minimum of van days prior to the public hearIM All materi- al used In Ovsentatlons before the Board will be- come a permanent part of mAn meson who derid- es to appeal a dedslon of the Board. will raW-q, re• " 17C ORDINANCE NO. 2001- s -, ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR CREATION AND REVIEW OF COUNTY BOARDS AND PROVIDING FOR A POLICY DECLARATION; PROVIDING DEFINTIONS; PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF NEW BOARDS; PROVIDING EXEMPTION; PROVIDING QUALIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR MEMBERSHIP; PROVIDING PROCESS OF APPOINTMENT; PROVIDING TERMS OF OFFICE; PROVIDING ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENT; PROVIDING SCHEDULE FOR REVIEW OF BOARDS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 86 -41, AS AMENDED; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Policy Declaration. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to promote economy, efficiency and improve service in the transaction of the public business by County Boards. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to prohibit or restrict the County Commission from amending or abolishing, at any time, any Board currently in existence or thereinafter created. SECTION TWO: Definitions. The term "Board" is defined to include every agency, advisory board, regulatory board, quasi - judicial board, committee, task force or any other group created and funded in whole or in part by the Board of County Commissioners. The term 'Commission" is defined as the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. SECTION THREE: Creation of New Boards. A. All Boards created after the effective date of this Ordinance shall be created by ordinance only, except for Ad -Hoc or Task Force Committees. Such ordinance shall set forth the Board's purpose; functions; powers; responsibilities; jurisdiction; membership requirements and restrictions; terms and conditions of appointment to and removal from the Board; and the specific staff support necessary to prepare an annual report, either oral or written, to be presented to the Commission. B. Prior to the advertised public hearing held for the adoption of said ordinance, the County Manager shall submit to the Commission a report setting forth following information concerning the proposed new Board: 1) Whether the establishment of the board will create sufficient betterment to the community to justify the Commission's delegation of a portion of its authority. 2) Whether another Board, either public or private, already in existence, could serve, or is serving the same purpose. 17C ^ -,� 3) The costs, both direct and indirect, of establishing and maintaining the new Board. 4) Whether creation of the new Board is necessary to enable the County to obtain state or federal grants or other financing. 5) Whether the Board should have bonding authority. 6) Whether creation of a new Board is the best method to achieve the benefit desired. SECTION FOUR: Exemption to Ordinance Requirement: Ad Hoc Committees and Task Force Committees. The Commission may, by resolution, appoint an Ad -Hoc or Task Force Committee for a specific project, if the duration of the Committee does not exceed three (3) years duration. The resolution must set forth the duties and responsibilities of the Committee and contain language that automatically dissolves the Committee within the specified year from the date of adoption of the Committee members by the Commission. SECTION FIVE: Qualifications and Requirements for Membership on Boards. A. All members of County Boards shall be permanent residents and electors of Collier County and should be reputable and active in community service. The foregoing requirement may be exempted, however, if an ordinance creating a board specifies the need for membership outside Collier County's boundaries. In addition, all Board members should have demonstrated an interest in the activity or service, which is the purpose of the Board. The provisions of this paragraph may be exempted, however, if an ordinance creating a board specifies the need for membership outside Collier County's boundaries. B. Any member of a County Board who ceases to be a resident of Collier County during his or her term of office shall immediately advise the Commission of such change in status. Upon such notice, the Commission shall declare the position to be vacant and shall promptly fill same pursuant to the provisions of Section Six, herein. C. The Commission's primary consideration in appointing Board members shall be to provide the Board with the technical, professional, financial, business or administrative expertise necessary to effectively accomplish the Board's purpose. Categories of expertise referenced by County Boards' Ordinances as qualifications for Board membership are considered to be primarily directory and not mandatory. D. No person shall serve on more than two County Boards simultaneously. If application is made for service on a third Board, the applicant must resign simultaneously from one of his or her current Board positions, or the application for a third Board shall be disqualified. This provision, however, may be waived to allow for service on additional Boards provided the Commission votes unanimously to waive such provision. E. No member of any County Board shall become a candidate for an elective political office and continue to serve on such Board during his or her candidacy. Should any County Board member become a candidate for an elective political office, such 0 17C candidacy shall be deemed a tender of resignation from such Board and the Board shall immediately advise the Commission in writing of said resignation. The Commission shall deem the position vacant upon receipt of written notice of said resignation. The Board member shall not serve at any meetings after his or her position becomes vacant pursuant to this Ordinance. F. The commencement of a legal challenge by a Board member as a plaintiff in a lawsuit against Collier County shall constitute a conflict of interest with Collier County and shall be deemed a tender of resignation from such Board. The County Board member's position shall automatically be considered vacant and the Commission shall promptly fill same pursuant to the provisions of Section Six, herein. G. No member of any County Board, as defined herein, shall print or create, or have printed or created, or use or distribute any business or informational card depicting the County logo or in any way representing such Board member as a representative of Collier County or as a County Board member. The County Manager or his or her designee may, upon request and prior approval in writing, authorize the County Board members to obtain a County photo identification card identifying such members as a County advisory Board member. SECTION SIX: Process of Appointment. A. Vacancies occurring on any Board shall be publicized, but need not be advertised, in a publication of general circulation within the County, and vacancy notices are to be posted in the County libraries and the County Government Center. B. Prior to making appointments to Boards, staff shall provide the Commission with a list outlining the qualifications and demographic background of each candidate for Board membership, along with a list detailing the qualifications and demographic backgrounds of present members seeking reappointment on each board to which an appointment is being made. SECTION SEVEN: Term of Office. A. Terms of office shall be staggered. B. Terms of office for Board members shall be limited to two consecutive terms of service on any one Board; provided, however, that appointment of a Board member to an initial term of one year shall not be considered a "term of office" for purpose of the limitations set forth in this Section, and such members shall be entitled to serve two additional terms if so appointed. C. Appointments to fill a vacancy for the remainder or balance of a term of office shall be considered a term of office for the purpose of the limitations set forth in Section Seven B, above, only if the remainder of the term to be served exceeds fifty percent (50 %) of the full term. D. By unanimous vote of the Commission, the limitations set forth in Section Seven B above may be waived. E. Nothing set forth in this Section shall prohibit any individual from being reappointed to a Board after a hiatus of two (2) years. 3 17C F. All members of Boards created by the Commission shall serve at the pleasure of the Commission and may automatically be removed by a majority vote of the quorum of the Commission. SECTION EIGHT: Attendance Requirement. It is the intent and strong desire of the Commission that there be full attendance of advisory Board members at all meetings of the Boards, recognizing, however, that it may be necessary for Board members to be absent from a meeting due to unusual or emergency circumstances. Nevertheless, full attendance at Board meetings is encouraged and necessary for the proper operation of the Boards and in furtherance thereof the following requirements are established: A. Any Board member who is absent for more than one -half of the Board's meetings in a given fiscal year shall be deemed to have tendered his or her resignation from such Board. The Commission shall, as soon as practicable after such resignation, declare the position to be vacant and shall promptly fill same pursuant to the provisions of Section Six herein. The Board members shall not serve at any meetings after his or her position is declared vacant by the Commission. B. In the event that any Board member is absent from two consecutive meetings without a satisfactory excuse acceptable to the Board chairperson, the Board chairperson shall state such fact at the next regularly scheduled Board meeting and shall thereafter notify, in writing, the Executive Manager to the Commission of the Board member's failure to attend without a satisfactory excuse. The Commission shall review the Board chairperson's notification at the Commission meeting and shall declare the Board member's position to be vacant if the Commission concurs that the Board member was absent from two consecutive Board meetings without a satisfactory excuse, and shall promptly fill same pursuant to the provisions of Section Six herein. The Board member shall not serve at any meetings after his or her position is declared vacant. C. A member of a Board shall be deemed absent from a meeting when he or she is not present during at least seventy five percent (75 %) of the meeting. SECTION NINE: Review of Boards. Each Board shall be reviewed in the following manner: A. All Boards shall be reviewed every four (4) years from the year the Board was first established. B. The County Manager or his designee shall provide notice to the Board prior to its date of review. On or before January 15th of the year in which a Board is to be reviewed, its Chairperson shall submit to the County Manager a report setting forth the following information regarding the Board: 1.) Whether the Board is serving the purpose for which it was created. 2.) Whether the Board is adequately serving current community needs. 3.) A list of the Board's major accomplishments for the preceding twelve month period. 4 17C 4.) Whether there is any other Board or agency, either public or private, which is serving or would better serve the purpose for which the Board was created. 5.) Whether the ordinance creating the Board should be amended to allow the board to more adequately serve the purpose for which it was created. 6.) Whether the Board's membership requirements should be modified. 7.) The cost, both direct and indirect, of maintaining the Board. C. On or before February 15th of the year in which a Board is to be reviewed, the County Manager shall deliver to the Commission the report submitted by the Chairperson of each Board, pursuant to Section Nine (B) of this Ordinance, together with any recommendation or comments the County Manager may have. In order to assist the County Manager and the Commission in the evaluation of the Chairperson's report, the County Manager and Commission may review applicable minutes of meetings of the Boards. All Boards shall be required to forward the minutes of all Board meetings to the Commission in a timely manner. D. During March of the year in which a Board is to be reviewed, the Chairperson shall make an oral presentation to the Commission. Said presentation shall be based upon the report submitted to the County Manager pursuant to Section Nine (B) of this Ordinance. At the conclusion of said oral presentation any Commissioner may request the formation of a subcommittee consisting of three (3) members of the Commission. Said subcommittee shall evaluate the Chairperson's report, the County Manager's recommendations and any other information it deems relevant to determine whether the Board shall continue in its present form. The subcommittee shall report to the Commission not later than within ninety (90) days after their initial meeting. E. At the conclusion of this review process, the Commission shall determine whether to abolish, continue, consolidate or modify the Board for the ensuing four years. SECTION TEN: Repeal of Ordinance No. 86 -41, As Amended. Collier County Ordinance No. 86 -41, as amended by Ordinance No. 92 -44, 98 -46, and 2000 -24, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION ELEVEN: Conflict and Severability. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of the Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION TWELVE: Inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. All references in the 1, 17C 't''A Code of Laws and Ordinances to Ordinance No. 86 -41 and its amendments shall be changed to reflect the number assigned to this Ordinance. SECTION THIRTEEN: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been filed with the Secretary of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this s day of October, 2001. ATTE$- ' .` BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DV iG'*H" ,g �aC ic,. �,lerk` COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 'test as ,t 'w �ix�aari''s By: Deputy berk JAMES "CARTER, Ph.D., Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel County Attorney h:public /kay /ordinances STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -55 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 23rd day of October, 2001, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 24th day of October, 2001. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts grid =;. k. Ex- officio to Boa'd County CommissiAz e By: Teri Michaelh ' ' Deputy .. + +`+ P Y Clerk ,;, + r +ill::Si1 _ COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF,PI TRI•IC_ HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: w -! XXX Normal legal Advertisement ❑ Other: 170 a (Display Adv., location, etc.) ** r+rrrr * * *rr *w *• * *r.w « *r• *r * * * *, rat**, r *w * *,r,r *,r *,t *r * * *rrw * *t,t *t,r Iw * *,,* « * * * «,r «•,r,t *. *,r* •mow *,rw * * * * * * * * « * *• * « «• * * * *+rw* Originating Dept/ Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person: xuj,$„� Date: it Petition No. (If none, give brief description): CU- 2001 -AR -1105, Lodestar Telecommunication Tower #11006 Petitioner: (Name & Address): Scott E. Gustafson, Lodestar Towers, Inc., 218 US Highway 1, Suite 300, Tequesta, FL 33469 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before XXX BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing =Qctober2 Ba sed on advertisement appearin 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other ❑ Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: CU- 2001 -AR -1105, Scott E. Gustafson from Lodestar Tower, Inc., representing Florida Department of Transportation, requesting conditional use for a telecommunication tower in the CON - ACSC /ST zoning district per Section 2.6.35.7 for property located on the south side of the existing Florida Department of Transportation fence within the Department of Transportation Right -of -Way in Section 1, Township 50 South, Range 34 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? XYes ❑ No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 113- 138312- 649110 Revie ed by: Approved by: 4,mudd" Q i7 Division Head Date List Attachments: County Manager Date A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ❑ County Manager agenda file: to ❑ Requesting Division Clerk's Office ❑ Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. wws *+r * * *wrrrr * * * *,► * * * *r *w * ** wow* w*, rw*****« r**«****« •w *w. * * «r * * * * * *• * *,r *,r * * * * *. ** *tom * *w * * * * * * * * * « * * * * * * * * *.r *w* FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: Date of Public hearing: /o /ZJ /e Date Advertised: &2,/ / J-70 RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE "CON /ACSC /ST" ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.6.35.7 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of an essential services conditional use pursuant to Section 2.6.35.7. in a "CON /ACSC /ST ", Conservation Zoning District with Area of Critical State Concern and Special Treatment Overlay for a communications tower with a maximum height of 240 feet on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A ") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida that: The petition filed by Lodestar Tower, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein be and the same is hereby approved for an essential services conditional use pursuant to Section 2.5.35.7 in a "CON,'ACSC SST ", Conservation Zoning District with Area of Critical State Concern and Spcclal Treatment 0, erlay for a communications tower with a maximum height of 240 feet in accwdarsce with the Conceptual \faster Plan (Exhibit "C ") and subject to the following conditions: - 1 - 17D Exhibit "D" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of '2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Mar orieUM. Student, Assistant County Attoney CU- 2001 -AR- 1105 /CB/lo BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN -2- 17C FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the stipulations, approval DATE: above findings, this conditional use should, with (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for EXHIBIT "A" 17D FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval DATE: MEMBER: 0 Collier County For Lodestar Site 11006 I -75 MM 51.2 Alligator Alley SURVEYOR'S REPORT SPECIRIC PURPOSE SURVEY FOR LODESTAR TOWERS, INC. OF THE TOWER SITE AT MrTERSTATE ROUTE 75 REST MILE MARK 61.2 (SITE 1-75 MM 61M COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LZOAL DWSMIPT10N. All that lot. piece or parcel of land situate, tying and being in Section 1, Township 50 South, Range 34 Cost, Collier County, Florida, the some being a portion of the area commonly known as Interstate Route 75 at Mile Mork 51.2 (Collier County) and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows. vlz.: BEGIN at the most Southeasterly Corner of the Subject Property, having for its coordinates a Northing of 668271.98 feet and an Easting of 693883.01 feet (The Preceding and following coordinate values being based on the North American Datum (NAD) 1983/1990 adjustment for the State Plane Coordinate System of the Florida East Zone.); thence 588'46'40 "W along the Southerly Boundary Line of the Subject Property for 110.00 feet to the most Southwesterly Corner of the Subject Property, having for its coordinates a Northing of 668269.64 feet and on Eosting of 693788.04 feet; thence N01'13'20'W along the Westerly Boundary Line of the Subject Property for 34.00 feet to the most Northwesterly Corner of the Subject Property. having for its coordinates a Northing of 668303.63 feet and an Eosting of 693787.31 feet; thence N88'46'40"E olong the Northerly Boundary Line of the Subject Property for 110.00 feet to the most Northeasterly Corner of the Subject Property. having . for its coordinates a Northing of 668306.00 feet and on Eosting of 693897.29 feet; thence S01"13'20 "E along the Easterly Boundory Line of the Subject Property for 34.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Parcel contains 3.740 square feet or 0.09 acres, more or less. by calculation. Scott Gustafson EXHIBIT "b" Spectrasite Communications CU- 2001 -AR -1105 218 US Highway 1 Suite 300 Tequesta, FL 33469 (561) 748 -9300 Ext. 29 17D 'I ��q g QR k§ i / | § -� Sm¥13a 31S / o __� _$_ ,VNV, SCI -nsw SIN � - -- � 170 � � � FIR | jai! \ i - J L - - -n2- _ k � ! \ � � i f | � f| � || | ■� \ / \/ P LP o \]\ - o ® �= z 7 =] \ � e 0 a < i e 0 0 C14 _ — - . c - -� o I § �® || � � }g q"b ■ ¥ m / k m 17D '.. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CU- 2001 -AR -1105 This approval is conditioned upon the following stipulations a. The Current Planning Manager, may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and Approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance (91 -102), as amended. EXHIBIT "D" 17D October 1, 2001 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1105 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, October 7, 2001 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: 113 - 138312 - 649110 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 23, 2001, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1105, Scott E. Gustafson from Lodestar Towers, Inc., representing Florida Department of Transportation, requesting Conditional Use for a telecommunication tower in the CON - ACSC/ST zoning district per Section 2.6.35.7 of the Collier County Land Development Code, for property located on the south side of the existing Florida Department of Transportation fence within the Department of Transportation Right -of -Way, in Section 1, Township 50 South, Range 34 East, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Ellie J. Hoffman To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1105 Hi Pam, Please advertise the above as noted on the attachment. Thanks Ellie 91� "I CU- 2001 -AR -1105. CU- 2001 -AR -1105. doc doc 17D Ellie J. Hoffman 1.7D "' From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:22 PM To: Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: Delivered: Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1105 Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1105 <<Petition CU- 2001 -AR- 1105» Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com' Subject: Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1105 Sent: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:24:12 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:22:01 -0400 1 .� kw 17Di� October 1, 2001 Mr. Scott E. Gustafson Lodestar Towers, Inc. 218 U.S. Highway 1, Suite 300 Tequesta, FL 33469 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1105 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 23, 2001, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 7, 2001. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 170 '*w Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 CU- -AR -1105 ��2p000��1 Affidavit of Publication °.. IPUBL11CWNIG ' Naples Daily News the Is hereby of oColiirdY --------------------------------------------- ----- +--------------------- - - - - -- ~ Commissioners of Caller County will hold a public hewing on Tuesday, Oc- ' Bober 23, 2001, in the Boardroom 3rd Floor, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Co eir Co � Building, CHRIS HORTON PO BOX 413016 ' ,ment Center, 3301 East Tomlaml Trail, Nopie Florida. The meeting will { NAPLES FL 34101 -3016 n at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consid- er Petition CU- 2001-AR-1105, Scott E. i. Gustafson from Lode - � star Towers Inc., rep resenting Florida REFERENCE: 001230 1131383126491 a f p o r t m e t o f 58328796 CU- 2001 -AR -1105 NOTI Transportati on re•, l yqesting Conditlonol State of Florida ` ni�aAloonn towelr In the County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally CON- ACSC�ST zoning per Section district Cooler the appeared Phil Lewis, who on oath says that he County County Lanof d ` nd Develop- serves as the Editor and Vice President of the at merit Code, for proper- ty on b1Q S0�' Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published Side f h Side of the existsrrg " Naples in Collier County, Florida: that the Florida Department of �' Transportation fence attached copy of advertising was published in said the Deportment newspaper on dates listed. of of Transportation Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily �` Right -of -way, In Sec - flan 1, Township 50 News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said 5 " South, R�angqee 34 East, Collier County, Florida, and that the said Cotilar CorrmY, Florida. NOTE: AN Persons newspaper has heretofore been continuously wishing it speak on a*. published in said Collier County, Florida, each em must regIs- day and has been entered as second class mail r wtih the County Ad. min�pr� to prime. matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year into-lion m to be addressed. In. next preceding the first publication of the iduai speakers will be fled to 5 minutes on attached copy of advertisement; and affiant any Item. The selection of further says that she has neither paid nor on Individual to speak on beh of an organization promised any person, firm or corporation any or grr oo up is encouraged. M discount, rebate, commission or refund for the for recognised by the Chair, a spokesperson for ° purpose of securing this advertisement may 9;01T 0 publiction in the said newspaper. to mine lotted- l0 minutes t0 speak ak Item. on an Persons to PUBLISHED ON: 10/07 wishing ha ve written or graphic' materials Included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. in any case, written materials In- AD SPACE: 103.000 INCH tended to be considered the Board shall be sub. FILED ON: 10/08/01 - -- ----- -----=---- -- - --- - - -- - m i tted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing All maters - Signature of Affiant �J al used In presentations before the Board will be. Sworn to and Subscribed before me this day of c/ 20 �` come a permanent part of the record Any person who decid. Personally known by me es to appeal-; decision of the will need.o re- fFle cord of proaeadl oertalnina thereettoo and oa.' "v'•., Nancy Evans �4�11t= MY COMMISSION # CC849370 EXPIRES i July 18, 2003 Vf ,14 9ONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCIv INC 7D RESOLUTION NO. 01- 41 9 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE "CON /ACSC /ST" ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.6.35.7 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 34 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of an essential services conditional use pursuant to Section 2.6.35.7. in a "CON /ACSC /ST ", Conservation Zoning District with Area of Critical State Concern and Special Treatment Overlay for a communications tower with a maximum height of 240 feet on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A ") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida that: The petition filed by Lodestar Tower, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein be and the same is hereby approved for an essential services conditional use pursuant to Section 2.6.35.7 in a "CON /ACSC /ST ", Conservation Zoning District with Area of Critical State Concern and Special Treatment Overlay for a communications tower with a maximum height of 240 feet in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") and subject to the following conditions: -1- 17D Exhibit "D" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this 01:3&& - day of ne.,- ]o E (Z , 2001. �41VT1rIT, .E.-BRO Clerk " At t- s to Chairman's _, Appro 'vdd as to' Form and Legal Sufficiency: MarjoricUM. Student, Assistant County Attoney CU- 2001 -AR- 1 105 /CB /lo BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLO A BY: JAMES 6. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN -2- t 17D FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes , No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended or approval J DATE: �(� ?.PSCS CHAIRMAN . J 44- EXHIBIT "A" F - 170 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes �_ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ing res & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, gla37'e, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use wi%h'n district Yes No Based on the above this k stipulations, (copy be recommended for approval �'rr DATE: MUBIT "A" 17D r FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes_ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes x _ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No —X— Based this—c recommended for step approval /J 4-1 CHAIRMAN: DATE : -0 1 EXHIBIT "A" 17D FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed_ structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ing s & egress re Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glarQ; economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use witVZ district Yes II// No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulati:7LAR=- ched) (should not) be recommended for approval �./ DATE: / O O 1161150 EXHIBIT "A" 17D FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1, Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorizeF t he conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: / Yes v No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress "egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or t/ Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use withi i.strict Yes No Based on the above this k stipulations, (copy be recommended for approval DATE: o EXHIBIT "A" I' 17o FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the La Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in ase of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingres & egress Yes No C. Affects eighboring properties in relation to noise, glare,,,,,' economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within strict Yes No Based on the above findings, thi itional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) should,) be r c mmended for approval DATE: t v �� EXHIBIT "A„ 17D FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes V No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed_ structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes_ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, gla , economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes V No rte--- - Based on the above findings, this conditional use shoul4) with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommend,& for approval ma"e'"l 0 � l� DATE: E) ffi IT "A" 17D FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1105 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: ✓ No Yes B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingres & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: —_kl No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes -z- No Based on the above findings, stipulations, (copy attached) approval �C,H,A, EXI-BBIT DATE: I (GJ this conditional use should, with (should not) be recommended for 17D Collier County For Lodestar Site 11006 I -75 MM 51.2 Alligator Alley SURVEYORS REPORT SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY FOR LODESTAR TOWERS, INC. OF THE TOWER SITE AT NTERSTATE ROUTE 75 REST (SITE 1-75 M 51M COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEG" DESCWTM MILE MARK St2 All that tot. piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in Section 1, Township 50 South, Range 34 Cost, Collier County. Florida, the some being a portion of the area commonly known as Interstate Route 75 at Mile Mork 51.2 (Collier County) and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows. viz.: BEGIN at the most Southeasterly Corner of the Subject Property, having for its coordinates a Northing of 668271.98 feet and an Eosting of 693883.01 feet (The Preceding and following coordinate values being based on the North American Datum (NAO) 1983/1990 adjustment for the State Plane Coordinate System of the Florid* East Zone.); thence S8846'40 "W along the Southerly Boundary Line of the Subject Property for 110.00 feet to the most Southwesterly Corner of the Subject Property, having for its coordinates a Northing of 668269.64 feet and on Eosting of 693788.04 feet; thence N01'13'20 "W along the Westerly Boundary Line of the Subject Property for 34.00 feet to the most Northwesterly Corner of the Subject Property, having for its coordinates a Northing of 660303.63 feet and an Eosting of 693787.31 feet; thence N88'46'40 "E along the Northerly Boundary Line of the Subject Property for 110.00 feet to the most Northeasterly Corner of the Subject Property. hosing . for its coordinates a Northing of 668306.00 feet and on Eosting of 693897.29 feet; thence S0113'20 "E along the Easterly Boundary Line of the Subject Property for 34.02 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said Parcel contains 3,740 square feet or 0.09 acres, more or less. by calculation. Scott Gustafson EXHIBIT "b" Spectrasite Communications CU-20.01-AR-1105 218 US Highway 1 Suite 300 Tequesta, FL 33469 (561) 748 -9300 Ext. 29 J� CD p SlIV130 311S Li 1VNV3 8Z1 - Z -l9 WW 9L-I .� i 00'YS I 1NDGH TV%GAO ,GG9 I alls3 UYU O' O f'- C C G G J V Q f _ W C 0 u C O � Ln I a a I 0 0 N I U o Q W J W U DO H H W 7 D CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CU- 2001 -AR -1105 This approval is conditioned upon the following stipulations: a. The Current Planning Manager may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance (91 -102). b. An Special Treatment (ST) Permit shall be approved prior to the final SDP approval. EXHIBIT "D" COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: 17E -1 XXX Normal Legal Advertisement 0 Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) ***** wr** wr* wrrw+ tw. r* w*, r* w* w, r, r*, r *,► * *rw *tw * * *w * * * * * * *r * *w *,► *rw *w *** wt, rt**** * * * * * *w *,r *ww *te * * *wrrt *,r *tr *w Originating Dept/ Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person cgl�` ate: q 2, r Petition No. (If none, give brief description): CU- 2001 -AR -1103, I -75 Rest Area Replacement Tower #11007 Petitioner: (Name & Address):Lodestar Towers, Inc., 218 US Highway 1, Ste. 300, Tequesta, FL 33469 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before 0 BCC 0 BZA O Other Requested Hearing date _October 23,200 l., Based on advertisement appearm 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News 0 Other 0 Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size:CU- 2001 -AR -1103, Scott E. Gustafson from Lodestar Towers, Inc., representing Florida Department of Transportation, requesting conditional use for a telecommunication tower in the CON - ACSC /ST zoning district per Section 2.6.35.7 for property located on the north side of I -75, Mile Marker 63.3, within the rest area on the south side of Alligator Alley in Section 1, Township 50 South, Range 32 East, Collier County, Florida Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? 0 Yes 0 No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 113- 138312 - 649110 Re vie d by: A roved by: O Division Head Date County Manager List Attachments: DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS Date A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request ff same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: 0 County Manager agenda file: to 0 Requesting Division 0 Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: a 6 Date of Public hearing: /�P� 3 Date Advertised: D o 17E - _U RESOLUTION NO. 01- A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE "CON /ACSC /ST" ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.6.35.7 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 32 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of an essential services conditional use pursuant to Section 2.6.35.7. in a "CON /ACSC /ST ", Conservation Zoning District with Area of Critical State Concern and Special Treatment Overlay for a communications tower with a maximum height of 280 feet on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A ") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida that: The petition filed by Lodestar Tower, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein be and the same is hereby approved for an essential services conditional use pursuant to Section 2.6.35.7. in a "CON /AC3C /ST ", Conservation Zoning District with Area of Critical State Concern and Special Treatment Overlay for a communications tower with a maximum height of 280 feet in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") and subject to the following conditions: -1- 17 E Exhibit "D" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of , 2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: MarjoriO M. Student, Assistant County Attoney CU-2001 -AR-1 103 /CB/lo BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA -2- JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN 17E., FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval DATE: EXHIBIT "A" 17E FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the stipulations, approval DATE: above findings, this conditional use should, with (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for MEMBER: 17E "! Collier County For Lodestar Site 11007 I -75 MM 63.3 Rest Area Replacement Tower LEGAL DESCRUMON SURVEYOR'S REPORT REVISED SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY FOR LODESTAR TOWERS, INC. OF TIC TOVMR SITE AT SITERSTATE 11-75 M 03.7 1TOVMR NO. 110071 COLLAR COUNTY, FLORIDA AN that lot. piece or Parcel of land situate. lying and being in Section 1. Township 50 Sou tin. Range 3L East. Collier County: Florida. the some being a portion of the area commonly known as Interstate I-75. and being more porticulbriy described by metes and bounds as follows. vis.: BEAN at the most Easterly Comer of the Subject Property, having for its coordinates a Northing of 656531.1559 feet and an Eosting of 630823.3732 feet (The preceding and following coordinate values being boxed an the North American Datum (MAD) 1983/1950 adjustment for the State Plane Coordinate System of the Florida East Zone.); thence S54 '42'31 "W along the Southeasterly Boundary line of the Subject Property for 130.00 feet to the most Southerly Corner of the Subject Propert . having for its coordinates a Northing of 666455.7472 feet and an Easter of 630717x4793 feet: thence N24'S5'09 "W long the Southwesterly Bounds��r Line of the subs* ct Property for 100.00 feet to the most Wester) Corner of the Subject Prolw . having for its coordinates o Northing of 666546.4375 feet and on Eosting of 53067x5.3454 feet: thence N67'50'25 "E along the Northwesterly Soundar ' Line of the Subject Property for 130.00 feet to the most Northerly garner of the Subject Pro ertyy, having for Its coordinates a Northing of 666595.47Z2 rest and an Costing of 0795.7432 feet: thence S2314054 "E along the Northeasterly Boundary Lane of the Subject Property for 70.00 feet to the POINT OF BEANNINC, Sold Parcel contains 10.840 square feet. more or Ism by calculation. Scott Chisudon Spectruite COIIIiilttnications 218 Us Highway 1 suite 300 Tequesta, FL 33469 (561) 748 -9300 Ext. 29 EXHIBIT "B" CU- 2001 -AR -17103 �_ SIIV130 311S i `=`T '°' °" ,.. s w C'Cwww SH 5L-I [ v e r� (-I) V zr i fill s sxwd owm wr —, - - -- waft Mum" An An w» 7mm - -- -- -- - uam nwrio .at 17E �$o V) _J LLJQ � F- • t W H M O A� H x H I H O yy� x ON R W D U ' 17E "! CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CU- 2001 -AR -1103 This approval is conditioned upon the following stipulations a. The Current Planning Manager, may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by this conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and Approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance (91 -102), as amended. EXHIBIT "D" 1 7 E� October 1, 2001 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1103 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, October 7, 2001 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: 113 - 138312- 649110 17E NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, October 23, 2001, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1103, Scott E. Gustafson from Lodestar Towers, Inc., representing Florida Department of Transportation, requesting Conditional Use for a telecommunication tower in the CON - ACSC/ST zoning district per Section 2.6.35.7 of the Collier County Land Development Code, for property located on the north side of I -75, Mile Marker 63.3, within the rest area on the south side of Alligator Alley in Section 1, Township 50 South, Range 32 East, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) _ 7 ; AQjuy� �C"1 Ellie J. Hoffman To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1103 Hi Pam, Please advertise the above hearing as indicated on the attached. Thank you. Ellie CU- 2001 -AR -1103. CU- 2001 -AR -1103. doc doc Ellie J. Hoffman 17 E From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:18 PM To: Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: Delivered: Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1103 I Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1103 <<Petition CU- 2001- AR -1103>> Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com' Subject: Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1103 Sent: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:20:22 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:18:11 -0400 1 17E October 1, 2001 Lodestar Towers, Inc. 218 U.S. Highway 1, Suite 300 Tequesta, FL 33469 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1103 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, October 23, 2001, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, October 7, 2001. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscribed before me this day of 20 ©� Personally known by me !�- -- Nancy Evans .�` MY COMMISSION # CC849370 EXPIRES f )uiy 18, 1003 BONDED THRU TROY FAiN INSURANCE, INC ' ED come a permorrent part of the record. Any Person who decld- es to appeal a decision of the Board will need a re- and the 17E " Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 - CU- 2001 -AR -1103 - Affidavit Of Publication NOTICE PUBLIC HEARING Naples Daily News NQ11ce is hereby given -------------------------------------------------- +------- ------- -- ----- - - - - -- that the Board of County Commissloroers of C0111er CauntY wIN hold gg public. Tuesday, � hearing on tuber 23, 2001, In the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Boardroom 3rd Filloor, Adminlsh-aon Building, CHRIS NORTON Cotiler County Govern - marl Center, East PO BOX 413016 Tamlaml Troll, Nap,es , Florida The meeflng wlli NAPLES FL 341 01 -301 6 begIn at 9:00 A.M. The Bou d will conskl- er Petition CU- 2001 -AR -1103, Scott E. Gustafson from Lode- star Tow�s, Inc., rep* Dfl REFERENCE: 001230 1131383126491 resaeriftno Felonrlda 58328788 CU- 2001 -AR -1103 NOTI Tronsportotion re. State of Florida Use for a teleciommu- r izoning Count of Collier Y �� CON ACSCt /S Before the undersigned authority, personalty district er Section of the Collier appeared Phil Lewis, who on oath says that he County Land Devele County serves as the Editor and Vice President of the r'• menu Code, for Proper- Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at ty located on the north 1-75 Mite Mark - Naples in Collier County, Florida: that the side of er''63.3, wlih►n the rest attached copy of advertising was published in said area on the south side in newspaper on dates listed. of ion 1, or Aliey Section t, Township 50 Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily South, Range 32 st, News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Coal (Rai ,Florida. NOTE: All Persons Collier County, Florida, and that the said � r any newspaper has heretofore been continuously newspaper agenddaa Item must ter the Countyid- in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail with sen�nalio o?ihe oil matter at the post office in Naples, in said Item to be Wdressed. In- dividual speakers will be Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year limited to minutes on next preceding the first publication of the copy of advertisement; and affiant any the selection of It em. T h an individual to speak onl attached further says that she has neither paid nor behalf of an cour zcdioif or group is encour� If the promised any person, firm or corporation any for the spokesperson by afiai�a discount, rebate, commission or refund or or Irson may be al- purpose of securing this advertisement for lotted 10 minutes to speak publiction in the said newspaper. on on Item. Persons wishing to PUBLISHED ON: 1007 mmaterials included InPthe Board agent! packets moterl0l must submit sold a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, wrtiten materials in- tended to be considered AD SPACE: 101 .000 INCH by the Board ahatl boepprrsub- am late FILED 10/08/01 1,� _ -------- - - - - +- Couunty staff OON: of seven days prior to the Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscribed before me this day of 20 ©� Personally known by me !�- -- Nancy Evans .�` MY COMMISSION # CC849370 EXPIRES f )uiy 18, 1003 BONDED THRU TROY FAiN INSURANCE, INC ' ED come a permorrent part of the record. Any Person who decld- es to appeal a decision of the Board will need a re- and the 17E RESOLUTION NO. 01- 4 1 3 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A COMMUNICATIONS TOWER IN THE "CON /ACSC /ST" ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.6.35.7 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 1, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 32 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of conditional uses; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of an essential services conditional use pursuant to Section 2.6.35.7. in a "CON /ACSC /ST ", Conservation Zoning District with Area of Critical State Concern and Special Treatment Overlay for a communications tower with a maximum height of 280 feet on the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A ") that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsection 2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida that: The petition filed by Lodestar Tower, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein be and the same is hereby approved for an essential services conditional use pursuant to Section 2.6.35.7. in a "CON /ACSC /ST ", Conservation Zoning District with Area of Critical State Concern and Special Treatment Overlay for a communications tower with a maximum height of 280 feet in accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") and subject to the following conditions: -1- 17E " r Exhibit "D" which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this ta3' =4 day of 6_&TO8 C. P-- , 2001. ATT DWIVi tE.,BJR0 clerk , °;At as to Cha roan s #!P rAly. .e• tip'. Approvedd,a$,tiR, orm and Legal Sufficiency: Mar on M. Student, Assistant County Attoney CU- 2001 -AR- 1103 /CB /lo BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS -2- 17E '- FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes ✓ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes ✓ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes l/' No Based on the above findings, this conditional use 1 with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recomm n ed for approval DATE: I. h l Z CHAIRMAN : — �L I wfap I I: 17E FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the L d Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes V No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in ase of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingres & egress Yes No C. Af/e, neighboring prope ties in relation to noise, glconomic or d fects: affect or Affect mitigated by Affect ca not be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use withi district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for approval �l DATE: EXHIBIT "A„ 17E FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management PlAn: Yes ✓ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, gla e, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use ithin district Yes No Based on the stipulations, approval above findings, this conditional use should, with be recommended for t l DATE: G MEMBER: 17E FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes Y No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes V No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, gla'e, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use �"'ithin district Yes V No Based on the above findings, this conditional use giidid with stipulations, (copy attached) (should not) be rec for approval DATE: ' G G MEMBER: 17E FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes k No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes _X_ No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use within district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) should not) be recommended for approval DATE: I o `) ( MEMBER: T 17E 14 FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management P�fan: Yes ✓✓ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & gress Yes No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects: ✓✓ No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use ithin district Yes No Based on the above findings, this conditional use should, with stipulations, 41fa attached) (should not) be recommended for approval DATE: MEMBER: ZOJA� 17E FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan- Yes ✓ No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & eg ess Yes X7 No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare economic or odor effects: Z/ No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible use wi in district Yes No Based on the above findings, th' ditional use should, with stipulations, (copy attached) should n>a be recommended for approval - �-h DATE: O �-/ MEMBER: I 7E FINDING OF FACT BY COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION FOR CU- 2001 -AR -1103 The following facts are found: 1. Section 2.6.35.6.3. of the Land Development Code authorized the conditional use. 2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property or uses in the same district or neighborhood because of: A. Consistency with the Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan: Yes tit No B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe: Adequate ingress & egress Yes y No C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to noise, glaze, economic or odor effects: No affect or Affect mitigated by Affect cannot be mitigated D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district: Compatible usewithin district Yes No Based on the stipulations, approval DATE: above findings, this conditional us-e should; with (copy attached) (should not) be recommended for MEMBER: 17E Collier County For Lodestar Site 11007 I -75 MM 63.3 Rest Area Replacement Tower LEGAL DESCRIPTION SURVEYOR'S REPORT REVISED SPECIFIC PURPOSE SURVEY FOR LODRSTAR TOWIsRS, W., OF TIC TOWER SITE AT MITERSTATE 1-76 AIWA 83.3 [TOWER NO. 110071 COLLIER COUNTY, FLOREIA AN that rot, piece or parcel of land situate. lying and being in Section 1. Township 50 South. Range os inteCollier eCl� 75 '0n boring hmore Partticularly es described by the and bounds as follows. viz.: BEGIN of the most Eosterly Corner of the Subject Property. having for its coordinates a Northing of 666531.1559 feat and an Eosting of 530823.3732 feet (The preceding and following coordinate values being based on the North American Datum (NAD) 1983/1990 adjustment for the State Diana Cooroinota System of the Florida East Zone.); thence S5474V31 "W along the Southeasterly Boundary Una of the Subject Property for 130.00 feet to the most Southerly Corner of the Subject Propert . having for its coordinates o Northing of 666455.7472 feet and on Eosting of 630717'4793 fact: thence N24'55'09 "W along the Southwesterly Boundary tine of the Subject Property for 100.00 feet to the most WestaiY Corner of the Subject Propartty having for its coordinates o Northing of 666546.4376 feet and on Eosting of 630675.3454 lest: thence N67'50'25 "E along the Northwesterly 6oundar Line of the Subject Property for 130.00 feet to the most Norther) Corner of Y the Subject Property having for its coordinates a Northing of 666995.4722 (set and on Costing of 63078.7432 feet: thence S2314'54 "E along the Northeasterly Boundary tine of the Subject Property for 70.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINMNG. Said Parcel contains 10.940 square feet. more or less, by calculation. EXHIBIT "B" CU- 2001 -AR -13'03 Scott Gustafson Spectrasite Communications 218 US Highway 1 Suite 300 Tequesta, FL 33469 (561) 748 -9300 Ext. 29 ur r� T Isi , n CI> � 7p n -- -- -- WOW- -- -- — - SIIV130 31IS s•ssww Sa SL I 5 Kr ill s zoZ s� s �o #o J a' w � w F- m M O U -+ E- H I W � H O O fil � U F , .w CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL CU- 2001 -AR -1103 This approval is conditioned upon the following stipulations: a. The Current Planning Manager may approve minor changes in the location, siting, or height of buildings, structures, and improvements authorized by the conditional use. Expansion of the uses identified and approved within this conditional use application, or major changes to the site plan submitted as part of this application, shall require the submittal of a new conditional use application, and shall comply with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time of submittal, including Division 3.3, Site Development Plan Review and approval, of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance (91 -102). b. An Special Treatment (ST) Permit shall be approved prior to the final SDP approval. EXHIBIT "D" COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please -place the following as a: x Normal legal Advertisement (Display Adv., location, etc.) ❑ Other: Originating Dept/ Div: County Attorney's Office Person: David C. Weigel, County Attorney Date: 09/25/01 Brief Description: Ordinance Amending the Collier County False Alarm Ordinance Petitioner: (Name & Address): Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before x BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appearin 10 ys before he g.) 10/23/01 Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): x Naples Daily News ❑ Other ❑ Legally Required AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 97 -8, THE FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE; ELIMINATING FALSE ALARM REPORT FORMS; REQUIRING AN ANNUAL REGISTRATION FORM FOR EACH FALSE ALARM SYSTEM; ELIMINATING FINE FOR SECOND FALSE ALARM; AUTHORIZING NOTICE TO APPEAR IN COURT FOR SIXTH OR SUBSEQUENT FALSE ALARMS; PROVIDING FOR FALSE ALARM PREVENTION EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM CLASSES AND CERTIFICATES OF ATTENDANCE; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WITH A DEFERRED ENFORCEMENT DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2001. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? t Yes ❑ No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 001- 010510- 649100 Reviewed by: David Weigel, eounty 90orney List Attachments: Ordinance Q-Z -G-a t Date Approved by: County Administrator Date r 4 DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS 17G A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Administrator. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ❑ County Administrator agenda file: ❑ Requesting Division to Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. **************************************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: Date of Public hearing: 101!�O Date Advertised: 17G ORDINANCE NO. 2001- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE 'NO. 97 -8, THE FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE; ELIMINATING FALSE ALARM REPORT FORMS; REQUIRING AN ANNUAL REGISTRATION FORM FOR EACH FALSE ALARM SYSTEM; ELIMINATING FINE FOR SECOND FALSE ALARM; AUTHORIZING NOTICE TO APPEAR IN COURT FOR SIXTH OR SUBSEQUENT FALSE ALARMS; PROVIDING FOR FALSE ALARM PREVENTION EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM CLASSES AND CERTIFICATES OF ATTENDANCE; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WITH A DEFERRED ENFORCEMENT DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2001. WHEREAS, as of April 1, 1997, the Collier County False Alarm Ordinance became effective; and WHEREAS, the initial False alarm Ordinance provided that False Alarm Report Forms had to be filed to report each False Alarm; and and WHEREAS, the False Alarm Ordinance is administered by the Sheriffs Office; WHEREAS, The Sheriffs Offices desires to eliminate such reports; and WHEREAS, The Sheriffs Offices desires that fines for False Alarms not be applied until the third or subsequent false alarm occurs at the respective Secured Premises and that a notice to appear for a mandatory court appearance not be authorized until the sixth or higher False Alarm occurs at the respective Secured Premises; and WHEREAS, the Sheriffs Office desires to institute and maintain an educational program that false alarm users may attend to learn to better prevent false alarms; and WHEREAS, a "Certificate of Attendance" at a false alarm prevention class can be credited to the respective Secured Premises to void one past or future false alarm incident except for a sixth or higher False Alarm at such Premises; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners accepts all amendments recommended by the Sheriffs Office. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Ordinance No. 97 -8, the Collier County "False Alarm Ordinance" is hereby amended as follows: 1 Text underlined is added; text n-et*h is deleted. 17G ? m SECTION ONE: Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -8, the "Collier County False Alarm Ordinance" (codified as Article 5 of the County's Code of Laws and Ordinances) is hereby amended as follows: SECTION ONE: This Ordinance is titled and should be cited as the "Collier County False Alarm Ordinance." SECTION TWO: DEFINITIONS. As used herein, the following terms shall have the specified meanings unless another meaning is clearly required by the context: Enforcement official means the Sheriff of Collier County, each Deputy sheriff, and /or any authorized representative or designee of the Sheriff. False alarm means activation of a security alarm signal caused by something other than an actual or attempted forced or unauthorized entry into or forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, and which signal results in a law enforcement response. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a security alarm signal is a false alarm whenever an enforcement officer responds to an alarm signal and the responding officer determines that the alarm signal was triggered by (a) a cause other than an attempted or actual forced or unauthorized entry into or forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, or (b) by intentional activation of that alarm signal based upon a good faith, reasonable mistake that a crime was being committed at the secured premises. Official response means when any enforcement officer responds by traveling to ''a secured premises in response to a security alarm signal from that premises. Owner means owner of the secured premises, including each co -owner of co- owned property, including, and not limited to, each tenant by the entireties, each joint tenant, and each tenant in common. Premises means any residence, any building or structure, and any apartment, office, condominium, or any other unit thereof. Responsible party means (a) each owner, (b) each 18 years or older occupant of the secured premises, and (c) each tenant and each subtenant, and (d) other persons or entities, if any, that have by written agreement with the owner agreed to be responsible for false alarms emitted from that secured premises. Secured Premises means the premises intended to be protected by the security alarm system. Security alarm malfunction means emission of any alarm signal caused by mechanical failure, improper system design, equipment malfunction, improper maintenance or lack of maintenance, power failure or power surge, or other substantially 2 Text underlined is added; text str-uek thFeu is deleted. 17G Cb similar cause. Malfunctions do not include any accidental activation of the alarm signal by an action that the system was designed to be triggered by. Security alarm system means any alarm device that is used to emit a signal to alert persons of an attempted or actual forced entry into or forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, and which system emits a signal (electrical impulse and /or tone) to prompt an official response from any Collier County enforcement officer. Excluded are (1) alarm devices that emit alarm signals because of unauthorized acts to a vehicle, and (2) systems installed by a telephone company to protect only the company's telephone equipment. Signal means a power impulse or audible tone emitted from a security alarm system which indicates that a true or. false alarm has occurred. Vacant means premises that are not physically occupied by any responsible adult at any time during an official response by an enforcement officer. SECTION THREE: RESPONSIBILITY FOR SECURITY ALARM SYSTEM AND FALSE ALARMS; REQUIRED RESPONSE. (a) Responsibility for Security Alarm Systems. Neither the County, nor the Sheriffs Office, nor any member of either shall have or assume any responsibility for the installation, repair, maintenance, operation, or effectiveness of any security alarm system not then owned by Collier County. Responsibilities for false alarms emitted by the respective security alarm system rest solely, jointly and severally, with each responsible party. Each active security alarm system in unincorporated Collier County must always have at least one (1) responsible party. No person or entity shall maintain any security alarm system that automatically dials the statewide emergency telephone number (currently "911 "), or any other telephone number assigned to the Sheriffs Office except as then required by federal law, state law, or county ordinance. (b) Responsibility For False Alarms. Each owner of the secured premises is primarily responsible under this Ordinance for false alarms at the secured premises. Owners may by lease or other written agreement assign that primary responsibility to persons or entities that occupy the secured premises, or to managers of the secured premises; however, failure of any such non -owner to fully comply with any warning or citation under this Ordinance shall render the owner responsible for such false alarms and the resulting penalties. Each responsible party is jointly and severally 3 Text underlined is added; text str-uek thr- is deleted. 17G 4 responsible under this Ordinance for all false alarms at the respective secured premises. the County. SECTION FOUR: WARNING OR CITATION OF FALSE ALARM VIOLATIONS. (a) First and Second False Alarm. A written warning shall be issued for the first and second false alarm at the respective secured premises. __A.:..h oeei after the cc elate of 4tis O aiitaf , . The warning may be left at the secured premises or otherwise delivered to a responsible party. The warning may be left at a conspicuous place within a vacant secured premises, or may be left with any adult occupant, employee, or agent of an occupant of an occupied secured premise. Alternatively, the warning may be mailed to any responsible party by regular United States mail, but if returned undelivered, then mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by actual service by any other lawful service of process. (b) Third Seeetd and Subsequent False Alarms. An enforcement official may issue a citation of a false alarm violation of this Ordinance for the third seeand or any other subsequent false alarm that occurs at that secured premises within 180 days of the last false alarm at that premises. The citation may be served upon any responsible party by any lawful service of process. Cci For the sixth or more false alarms at the secured premises, a "Notice to A1212ear" (in Court) can be issued, which "Notice" shall require prompt payment of a $100 fine or a mandatory court appearance. If the $100 fine is paid by its due date, the mandatory court appearance will thereby be cancelled. Failure to pay the $100 fine by its due date will require the specified mandatory court appearance unless otherwise continued or excused. The judge or other trier of fact can impose a fine from $100 to $300 plus other applicable costs. 4 Text underlined is added; text stFuek thF is deleted. 17G ;44 19 ' REGISTRATION SECTION FIVE: FALSE ALARM FORM& REPOWF FORM GORR ! a!-! il. 1\. }aa•}SL.I:lnlltl�l�S•!_w.1�T }f. l.... l•1! }.k.wm �'��.�•.�w./ —,M \�Iw `1, V-wp :. - -pI , 0 w s: 7. Sal Oa.•.\' w!1 \•.i • ��saa. s: r% a: �\: r�wi\ �: a�aii\: i• a:\: ��rri�: �• a�aw: a\ :\i�:s:�a:�ise.:i.:w:r�► :��wi\• -- - : • : I� • f• T w: i a nl• i \:I ll ..: r:>'�l:..t \l :.'w.:,•�.: a: \:}.�... f w � l:l�.!i�l:.:\:1 w:l� f:l� w. }� \:f:I f w: \• PIPP • maw If ow e ! a!-! il. 1\. }aa•}SL.I:lnlltl�l�S•!_w.1�T }f. l.... l•1! }.k.wm �'��.�•.�w./ —,M \�Iw `1, V-wp :. - -pI , 0 w s: 7. Sal Oa.•.\' w!1 \•.i • ��saa. s: r% a: �\: r�wi\ �: a�aii\: i• a:\: ��rri�: �• a�aw: a\ :\i�:s:�a:�ise.:i.:w:r�► :��wi\• -- - : • : I� • f• T w: i a nl• i \:I ll ..: r:>'�l:..t \l :.'w.:,•�.: a: \:}.�... f w � l:l�.!i�l:.:\:1 w:l� f:l� w. }� \:f:I f w: \• Text underlined is added; text st-tek thr- is deleted. PIPP • Text underlined is added; text st-tek thr- is deleted. 4 r G MR "MEM 2001, the completed Registration • (a� No Security Alarm System installed on or after November 1 2001 shall be operated until a completed Alarm Registration Form has been received by the Collier County Sheriffs Office False Alarm Unit. A separate Registration Form is required for each es curity alarm system. The Registration Form shall be supplied by the Sheriff's Office or the alarm company and shall be filled out completely with the required information. For each security alarm system that was installed at the secured premises prior to November 1 2001, the completed Registration Form must be filed entity, or site. not later than five (5) week days of the first false alarm that occurs after November 1, 2001. (c) Each Registration Form shall automatically expire three hundred and sixty- five (365) days after its date of issuance Each registration renewal must be received by the Sheriffs False Alarm Unit before the then effective Registration Form expires At least thirty (30) days before the expiration date of each then effective Registration Form, the Sheriffs False Alarm Unit will attempt to provide written notice of the need to renew that Form (dl No Registration Form shall be transferred to any other person, entity, or site. (ee) Not later than five (5) week days after each respective change, a responsible person for the respective security alarm system shall mail or otherwise deliver to the Sheriff s Office False Alarm Unit written notice of all changes that alter any information in the then current Registration Form Each Registration Form must include the following information: (1) The full name(s), mailing address, residence and /or work place t=elephone number of at least one responsible person regarding the respective security alarm system at that secured premises. (2) The name, mailing address, and telephone number of at least one (1) authorized individual representative of a responsible person who can be immediately notified in the event of a false alarm or any emergency at that secured premises. 43 If applicable to the secured premises, the name and 24 -hour telephone numbers) of the individual or entity monitoring the respective security alarm system. 6 Text underlined is added; text stFuektY3r-eu is deleted. 17G (41 And dangerous or special conditions present at the Secured Premises that would be of value to the safety of security of a responding person or to the secured premises. .(5) Other information that may assist responding persons in the event that a false alarm occurs at the secured premises (g) Information contained in the registration application form is confidential and is exempt from public disclosure to the extent authorized in Section 281 301, Florida Statutes, as now or hereafter amended or superceded which as of November 1 2001, applies to propel owned by or leased to the State of Florida or any of its political subdivisions, including Collier County, and to every other public or private agency, person, partnership corporation, or business entity acting on behalf of any public Agency as false alarm prevention now or hereafter defined in, or incorporated by reference into, Subsection 119.011(2, Florida Statutes. (h) Failure to register or renew a complete Registration Form by its due date shall be a separate violation of this Article and shall require prompt payment of a late fee of $25.00, Late fees are in addition to fines SECTION SIX• FALSE ALARM PREVENTION PROGRAM. fat The Sheriffs Office will provide educational program classes for the prevention of false alarms and shall allow individuals to attend any false alarm prevention program class Each person who attends s_false alarm prevention program class must pay a fee of $5.00 to cover some of the administrative costs This fee rust be paid before or at the time of attendance at the program class ,(b) After attendance at a program class by a person associated with the respective secured premises, the Sheriffs Office shall issue one (1) "Certificate of Attendance" to the credit of that respective secured premise The certificate may be used by a representative of the secured premises to void one (1) prior or one (1) future false alarm, including the penalties that would otherwise result from that false alarm No certificate shall apply to a sixth or higher false alarm SECTION SIX SEVEN: FALSE ALARM FINES; EXCEPTIONS. (a) False Alarm Fines. A written warning (for the first and second false alarms) does not require payment of a fine. After a citation for a 1hird seeand or subsequent false alarm violation is issued, a responsible party shall, within Text underlined is added; text stfuel - is deleted. . CIA rll 17G thirty (30) days of the date of that alarm, pay to the Clerk of the Courts a false alarm civil fine as follows: FALSE ALARM FINE SCHEDULE Number of False Alarms Within a 180 Day Period False Alarm Fine Per False Alarm: First Response ...............Mttsf File Repere, Warning issued, no false alarm fine. Second Response............ File Report pitts $75.00 fifte.-War ning issue no false alarm fine. Third Response .............. File - Citation issued: $75.00 fine. Fourth Response ............. File ReportlAtis Citation issued: $75.00 fine. Five at mare ... , and firte of not less thaft $100.00 tiat more than $30 nn Fifth Response . Citation issued. $75.00 fine. Sixth or more Responses Notice to Appear issued and a $100, 00 fine if the fine is paid on time Timely 12& yment of the S100.00 fine cancels that mandatory court appearance Mandatory, court ap2pearance can result in a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $300.00 at the discretion of the trier of fact (b). Exceptions: (1) 180 Days Without a False Alarm. If one hundred eighty (180) days pass without a false alarm from the respective alarm system, a "clean slate" status shall be automatically granted to that system if each Report has been filed and all false alarm fines arising out of every prior false alarm' for that system have been paid. The first false alarm after "clean slate" status shall require only a written warning and shall commence a new 180 day time period form subsequent false alarms from that alarm system. (2) New Alarm System Installed. Installation of an entirely new security alarm system at the secured premises, upon written notice of same to the Sheriffs Office and all prior false alarm fines and late fees are paid, shall be classified as a new system and shall be treated as an alarm system that had no prior false alarm(s) — "clean slate" status. (3) Good Faith Mistake of Crime Being Committed. No person shall violate this Ordinance by intentionally setting off a security alarm signal to prompt an official response if that was alarm set off based upon a reasonable mistake of fact that a crime was then being committed at the secured premises. The responding enforcement official will determine 8 Text underlined is added; text stnaek thr- is deleted. 17G �m° whether there was a reasonable mistake of fact to justify that intentional activation of that alarm signal. If excused, that alarm shall not be counted as a false alarm. SECTION Sri EIGHT. ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY PROVISIONS. (a) Incorporation of Section 1 -6 of the County Code of Laws and Ordinances. In addition to all enforcement provisions specified in this Ordinance, and as provided for in Section 125.69, Florida Statues, any person who shall violate any provision of this Ordinance shall, at the election of the County, be subject to the enforcement provisions of Section 1 -6 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, excluding possible imprisonment, except for contempt of court. Violations of this Ordinance may be referred by the Sheriff to the Code Enforcement Board for enforcement pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes, including filing liens against the secured premises. (b) Joint and Severable Responsibility to Pay Fees and Fines. All fees and /or fines charged under this Ordinance shall be an obligation owned jointly and severally by each responsible party. Fees and fines shall be paid to the Clerk of Court within the time periods specified in this Ordinance except as may be ordered otherwise by a trial judge. Prompt payment of each false alarm fine shall clear and settle that false alarm violation, but shall not affect the duty to file aW the respeetive False Alarm Rep Registration Form. (c) Fines and Costs Imposed by Court. Fines and costs imposed against a responsible party are to be distributed as follows: Five Few dollars ($4:80) 5.00 to the Clerk of the Courts as an administration fee, and the balance of the funds of each fine is to be deposited in the fine and forfeitures fund of the Sheriffs Office to offset the Sheriffs operating budget costs. SECTION TWO: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event that this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. 9 Text underlined is added; text str-uek r is deleted. SECTION THREE: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE — ENFORCEMENT DEFERRED. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State, but shall not be enforced until 12:01 A.M. on the 1" day of November, 2001. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney 2001. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONEIIS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES D. CARTER. Ph.D., CHAIRMAN 10 Text underlined is added; text stmt is deleted. 17G �0' September 28, 2001 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 97 -8 (False Alarm Ordinance) Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Friday, October 12, 2001 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: Account 001- 010510- 649110 17G ! NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 97 -8, THE FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE; ELIMINATING FALSE ALARM REPORT FORMS; REQUIRING AN ANNUAL REGISTRATION FORM FOR EACH FALSE ALARM SYSTEM; ELIMINATING FINE FOR SECOND FALSE ALARM; AUTHORIZING NOTICE TO APPEAR IN COURT FOR SIXTH OR SUBSEQUENT FALSE ALARMS; PROVIDING FOR FALSE ALARM PREVENTION EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM CLASSES AND CERTIFICATES OF ATTENDANCE; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WITH A DEFERRED ENFORCEMENT DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 2001. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 7 G JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 17G Ellie J. Hoffman To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: An ordinance amending 97 -8 (False Alarm Ord.) Good Afternoon, Pam, Please advertise the above as per the attached. Thanks. Ellie ill ®-1 Amend 97 -8.doc Amend 97 -8.doc Ellie J. Hoffman ­ "0 R4 -7G I Al From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 11:42 AM To: Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: Delivered: Petition LDC- 2001 -2 Petition LDC- 2001 -2 <<Petition LDC- 2001 -2» Your message To: 'paperrell@naplesnews.com' Subject: Petition LDC- 2001 -2 Sent: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:44:22 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:42:14 -0400 1 Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHRIS HORTON PO BOX 413016 NAPLES Fl 34101 -3016 REFERENCE: 001230 0010105106491 58330389 AMEND ORD. 97 -8 NOTI State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared Phil Lewis, who on oath says that he serves as the Editor and Vice President of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier. County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 10112 AD SPACE: 121.000 INCH I FILED ON: 10/12/01 -------- ------------ -------------- ----- ----------- - - - - -- - -- ---- - - - - -- Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscribed before me this, day of 20 Personally known by me Nancy Evans f.1Y COMMISSION # CC849370 EXPIRES ?r , July 18, 2003 EP,it; SCNDEDTHRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE INC ment nance. I, t s h- I- II d E R E V 5 of ani. G are ovallaote Tor inw - are Invited Interested parties and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda Item must regis- ter with. the County ad- ministrator �+rlor to Pre- sentation of the agenda Item to be addressed. In- dlvidual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on .any item. The selection of an Individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group Is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair- man, a spokesperson for a group or orgOnIZ0110131 umteasy be s� n IF min- to Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included In the Board aq nda =kettsF a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials in. tended to be considered by the Board shall be sub- miffed to the approprlate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to file public hewing. All materi- al used in presentations before the Board will be- come a permanent part of the record Any person who decld- es to appeal a decision of the Board will need a. re- '� }yvt� 17G ORDINANCE NO. 2001- 5 6_ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE -NO. 97 -8, THE FALSE ALARM ORDINANCE; ELIMINATING FALSE ALARM REPORT FORMS; REQUIRING AN ANNUAL REGISTRATION FORM FOR EACH FALSE ALARM SYSTEM; ELIMINATING FINE FOR SECOND FALSE ALARM; AUTHORIZING NOTICE TO APPEAR IN COURT FOR SIXTH OR SUBSEQUENT FALSE ALARMS; PROVIDING FOR FALSE ALARM PREVENTION EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM CLASSES AND CERTIFICATES OF ATTENDANCE; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WITH A DEFERRED ENFORCEMENT DATE OF NOVEMBER 11 2001. WHEREAS, as of April 1, 1997, the Collier County False Alarm Ordinance became effective; and WHEREAS, the initial False alarm Ordinance provided that False alarm Report Forms had to be filed to report each False Alarm; and and WHEREAS, the False Alarm Ordinance is administered by the Sheriffs Office; WHEREAS, The Sheriff's Offices desires to eliminate such reports; and WHEREAS, The Sheriffs Offices desires that fines for False Alarms not be applied until the third or subsequent false alarm occurs at the respective Secured Premises and that a notice to appear for a mandatory court appearance not be authorized until the sixth or higher False Alarm occurs at the respective Secured Premises; and WHEREAS, the Sheriffs Office desires to institute and maintain an educational program that false alarm users may attend to learn to better prevent false alarms; and WHEREAS, a "Certificate of Attendance" at a false alarm prevention class can be credited to the respective Secured Premises to void one past or future false alarm incident except for a sixth or higher False Alarm at such Premises; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners accepts all amendments recommended by the Sheriffs Office. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Ordinance No. 97 -8, the Collier County "False alarm Ordinance" is hereby amended as follows: 1 Text underlined is added; text str-uek +t-,rougt-, is deleted. 17G SECTION ONE: Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -8, the "Collier County False Alarm Ordinance" (codified as Article 5 of the County's Code of Laws and Ordinances) is hereby amended as follows: SECTION ONE: This Ordinance is titled and should be cited as the "Collier County False Alarm Ordinance." SECTION TWO: DEFINITIONS. As used herein, the following terms shall have the specified meanings unless another meaning is clearly required by the context: Enforcement official means the Sheriff of Collier County, each Deputy sheriff, and /or any authorized representative or designee of the Sheriff. False alarm means activation of a security alarm signal caused by something other than an actual or attempted forced or unauthorized entry into or forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, and which signal results in a law enforcement response. There shall be a rebuttable presumption that a security alarm signal is a false alarm whenever an enforcement officer responds to an alarm signal and the responding officer determines that the alarm signal was triggered by (a) a cause other than an attempted or actual forced or unauthorized entry into or forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, or (b) by intentional activation of that alarm signal based upon a good faith, reasonable mistake that a crime was being committed at the secured premises. Official response means when any enforcement officer responds by traveling to a secured premises in response to a security alarm signal from that premises. Owner means owner of the secured premises, including each co -owner of co- owned property, including, and not limited to, each tenant by the entireties, each joint tenant, and each tenant in common. Premises means any residence, any building or structure, and any apartment, office, condominium, or any other unit thereof. Responsible party means (a) each owner, (b) each 18 years or older occupant of the secured premises, and (c) each tenant and each subtenant, and (d) other persons or entities, if any, that have by written agreement with the owner agreed to be responsible for false alarms emitted from that secured premises. Secured Premises means the premises intended to be protected by the security alarm system. Security alarm malfunction means emission of any alarm signal caused by mechanical failure, improper system design, equipment malfunction, improper maintenance or lack of maintenance, power failure or power surge, or other substantially 2 Text underlined is added; text st ^'r, through. is deleted. 17G similar cause. Malfunctions do not include any accidental activation of the alarm signal by an action that the system was designed to be triggered by Security alarm system means any alarm device that is used to emit a signal to alert persons of an attempted or actual forced entry into or forced or unauthorized exit from the secured premises, and which system emits a signal (electrical impulse and /or tone) to prompt an official response from any Collier County enforcement officer. Excluded are (1) alarm devices that emit alarm signals because of unauthorized acts to a vehicle, and (2) systems installed by a telephone company to protect only the company's telephone equipment. Signal means a power impulse or audible tone emitted from a security alarm system which indicates that a true or false alarm has occurred. Vacant means premises that are not physically occupied by any responsible adult at any time during an official response by an enforcement officer. SECTION THREE: : RESPONSIBILITY FOR SECURITY ALARM SYSTEM AND FALSE ALARMS; REQUIRED RESPONSE. (a) Responsibility for Security Alarm Systems. Neither the County, nor the Sheriffs Office, nor any member of either shall have or assume any responsibility for the installation, repair, maintenance, operation, or effectiveness of any security alarm system not then owned by Collier County. Responsibilities for false alarms emitted by the respective security alarm system rest solely, jointly and severally, with each responsible party. Each active security alarm system in unincorporated Collier County must always have at least one (1) responsible party. No person or entity shall maintain any security alarm system that automatically dials the statewide emergency telephone number (currently "911 "), or any other telephone number assigned to the Sheriffs Office except as then required by federal law, state law, or county ordinance. (b) Responsibility For false Alarms. Each owner of the secured premises is primarily responsible under this Ordinance for false alarms at the secured premises. Owners may by lease or other written agreement assign that primary responsibility to persons or entities that occupy the secured premises, or to managers of the secured premises; however, failure of any such non -owner to frilly comply with any warning or citation under this Ordinance shall render the owner responsible for such false alarms and the resulting penalties. Mach responsible party is jointly and severally 3 Text underlined is added; text strueli. thrett& is deleted. 176 responsible under this Ordinance for all false alarms at the respective secured premises. _ - - ; :- SECTION FOUR: WARNING OR CITATION OF FALSE ALARM VIOLATIONS. (a) First and Second False Alarm. A written warning shall be issued for the first and second false alarm at the respective secured premises. w +tie' aeei c-. r the eff t date of this Ordi .... ee. The warning may be left at the secured premises or otherwise delivered to a responsible party. The warning may be left at a conspicuous place within a vacant secured premises, or may be left with any adult occupant, employee, or agent of an occupant of an occupied secured premise. Alternatively, the warning may be mailed to any responsible party by regular United States mail, but if returned undelivered, then mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by actual service by any other lawful service of process. (b) Third Seeend and Subsequent False Alarms. An enforcement official may issue a citation of a false alarm violation of this Ordinance for the third seeond or any other subsequent false alarm that occurs at that secured premises within 180 days of the last false alarm at that premises. The citation may be served upon any responsible party by any lawful service of process. (c) For the sixth or more false alarms at the secured premises, a "Notice to Appear" in Courtl can be issued which "Notice" shall require prompt payment of a $100 fine or a mandatory court appearance If the $100 fine is paid by its due date, the mandatory court appearance will thereby be cancelled. Failure to pay the $100 fine by its due date will require the specified mandatory court appearance unless otherwise continued or excused The judge or other trier of fact can impose a fine from $100 to $300 plus other applicable costs. 4 Text underlined is added; text str-uek ' hr-o • ``h is deleted. 17G SUCTION DIVE: FALSE ALARM REGISTRATION DORMS. REPOR-T FORM rnuurcT -j-V- AC-410N- w�� !\��ift.iil�l�/!• \i•1�7►Tfl•i \i t•A l�l i2 •l:li \��i.• ...•1NO�: /�!.! \�flf�ll<:2ia���I ��. �t.• 11I . \R4l.Il.J�lll��ilR7!•1.1t.11: �:y�•i.JSf�A.l ll1.1! \.I•l •.!.•!. •1.1 �•I �!•l� Fei'raiiii�i�Gi�:i�:�i►i�•.— iii = -° - -- •• ' : ' — °— - -° — =- --- FR. ►t��•�Ili�R/ ■mil lll�� \.)l•l: ►.1tl.- • • ___ _ —___•_ _ -- —•- -•})��� •\. i�. i• l .I!!•fR!•l:ll�!•ftl�i. ►!• =R.\lU flis••l.��li \Ai• \� \� .i \Raf •.t!• \•, • 01-3111 Q - •- • . Text underlined is added; text struek taro^.'' is deleted. - - - - WAN - - - : - is ro MGM •: w�� !\��ift.iil�l�/!• \i•1�7►Tfl•i \i t•A l�l i2 •l:li \��i.• ...•1NO�: /�!.! \�flf�ll<:2ia���I ��. �t.• 11I . \R4l.Il.J�lll��ilR7!•1.1t.11: �:y�•i.JSf�A.l ll1.1! \.I•l •.!.•!. •1.1 �•I �!•l� Fei'raiiii�i�Gi�:i�:�i►i�•.— iii = -° - -- •• ' : ' — °— - -° — =- --- FR. ►t��•�Ili�R/ ■mil lll�� \.)l•l: ►.1tl.- • • ___ _ —___•_ _ -- —•- -•})��� •\. i�. i• l .I!!•fR!•l:ll�!•ftl�i. ►!• =R.\lU flis••l.��li \Ai• \� \� .i \Raf •.t!• \•, • 01-3111 Q - •- • . Text underlined is added; text struek taro^.'' is deleted. 17G a No Security Alarm System installed on or after November 1 2001 shall be operated until a completed Alarm Registration Form has been received b the Collier County Sheriffs Office False Alarm Unit. A separate Registration Form is required for each security alarm system. The Registration Form shall be supplied by the Sheriffs Office or the alarm company and shall be filled out completely with the required information. (b) For each security alarm system that was installed at the secured premises prior to November 1 2001 the completed Registration Form must be filed not later than five (5) week days of the first false alarm that occurs after November 1, 2001. (c) Each Registration Form shall automatically expire three hundred and sixty- five (3651 days after its date of issuance Fach registration renewal must be received by the Sheriffs False Alarm Unit before the then effective Registration Form expires At least thirty (30) days before the expiration date of each then effective Registration Form, the Sheriffs False Alarm Unit will attempt to provide written notice of the need to renew that Form. (d) No Registration Form shall be transferred to any other person. entity, or site. (e) Not later than five (5 week days after each respective change, a responsible Verson for the respective security alarm system shall mail or otherwise deliver to the Sheriffs Office False Alarm Unit written notice of all changes that alter any information in the then current Registration Form. Each Registration Form must include the following information: �1) The full name(s), mailing address, residence and /or work place telephone number of at least one responsible person regarding the respective security alarm system at that secured premises. (22) The name, mailinV address, and telephone number of at least one (1) authorized individual representative of a responsible person who can be immediately notified in the event of a false alarm or any emergency at that secured premises. (31 If applicable to the secured premises, the name and 24 -hour telephone number of the individual or entity monitorinr, the respective security alarm system. Text underlined is added; text t F:ue thre ``'' is deleted. 17G (4) Any dangerous or special conditions present at the Secured Premises that would be of value to the safety of security of a responding person or to the secured premises. (5) Other information that may assist responding persons in the event that a false alarm occurs at the secured premises. Information contained in the re istration application form is confidential and is exempt from public disclosure to the extent authorized in Section 281.301, Florida Statutes, as now or hereafter amended or superseded. which as of November 1, 2001, applies to property owned by or leased to the State of Florida or any of its political subdivisions including Collier County., and to every other public or private agency, person partnership, corporation, or business entity acting on behalf of any public Agency as now or hereafter defined in, or incorporated by reference into, Subsection 119.011(2). Florida Statutes. (h) Failure to register or renew a complete Registration Form by its due date shall be a separate violation of this Article and shall require prompt payment of a late fee of $25.00. Late fees are in addition to fines. SECTION SIX: FALSE ALARM PREVENTION PROGRAM. (a) The Sheriff's Office will provide educational program classes for the prevention of false alarms and shall allow individuals to attend any false alarm prevention program class Each person who attends a false alarm prevention program class must nay a fee of $5.00 to cover some of the administrative costs This fee must be paid before or at the time of attendance at the program class. After attendance at a program class by a person associated with the respective secured remise~, the Sheriff's Office shall issue one (1) "Certificate of Attendance" to the credit of that respective secured premise The certificate may be used by a representative of the secured premises to void one-(I) Drior or one (1) future false alarm including the penalties that would otherwise result from that false alarm. No certificate shall app] y to a sixth or higher false alarm. SECTION � SEVEN: FALSE ALARM FINES; EXCEPTIONS. (a) False Alarm Dines. A written warning (for the first and second false alarms) does not require payment of a fine. After a citation for a third seeatid or subsequent false alarm violation is issued, a responsible party shall, within 7 Text underlined is added; text t -••ek th "ough is deleted. 17G thirty (30) days of the date of that alarm, pay to the Clerk of the Courts a false alarm civil fine as follows: FALSE ALARM TINE SCHEDULE Number of False Alarms Within a 180 Day Period False Alarm Fine Per False Alarm: First Response ............... N4t"if - File -Repo t; Warning issued, no false alarm fine. Second Response............ Warninr, issued, no false alarm fine. Third Response .............. Citation issued; $75.00 fine. Fourth Response ............ File ReportfAtts Citation issued; $75.00 fine. Five or more Responses. ... File Report; mftndatory ourt-appearatte-e and fine of not ess that, $!00.00 nor more thatt $300.00 Fifth Response Citation issued. $75.00 fine. Sixth or more Responses Notice to Appear issued and a $100, 00 fine if the fine is paid on time Timely payment of the $100-00 fine cancels that mandatory court appearance Mandatory court appearance can result in a fine of not less than $100 nor more than-S300.00 at the discretion of the trier of fact. (b). Exceptions: (1) 180 Days Without a False Alarm. If one hundred eighty (180) days pass without a false alarm from the respective alarm system, a "clean slate" status shall be automatically granted to that system if each Report has been filed and all false alarm fines arising out of every prior false alarm for that system have been paid. The first false alarm after "clean slate" status shall require only a written warning and shall commence a new 180 day time period farm subsequent false alarms from that alarm system. (2) New Alarm System Installed. Installation of an entirely new security alarm system at the secured premises, upon written notice of same to the Sheriff's Office and all prior false alarm fines and late fees are paid, shall be classified as a new system and shall be treated as an alarm system that had no prior false alarm(s) — "clean slate" status. (3) Good faith Mistake of Crime Being Committed. No person shall violate this Ordinance by intentionally setting off a security alarm signal to prompt an official response if that was alarm set off based upon a reasonable mistake of fact that a crime was then being committed at the secured premises. The responding enforcement official will determine 8 Text underlined is added; text stmek thr -etigh is deleted. 17G whether there was a reasonable mistake of fact to justify that intentional activation of that alarm signal. If excused, that alarm shall not be counted as a false alarm. SECTION EIGHT. ENFORCEMENT AND PENALTY PROVISIONS. (a) Incorporation of Section 1 -6 of the County Code of Laws and Ordinances. In addition to all enforcement provisions specified in this Ordinance, and as provided for in Section 125.69, Florida Statues, any person who shall violate any provision of this Ordinance shall, at the election of the County, be subject to the enforcement provisions of Section 1 -6 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, excluding possible imprisonment, except for contempt of court. Violations of this Ordinance may be referred by the Sheriff to the Code Enforcement Board for enforcement pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes, including filing liens against the secured premises. (b) Joint and Severable Responsibility to Pay Fees and Fines. All fees and /or fines charged under this Ordinance shall be an obligation owned jointly and severally by each responsible party. Fees and fines shall be paid to the Clerk of Court within the time periods specified in this Ordinance except as may be ordered otherwise by a trial judge. Prompt payment of each false alarm fine shall clear and settle that false alarm violation, but shall not affect the duty to file An y the respeetive False Alanin Rep Registration Form. (c) Fines and Costs Imposed by Court. Fines and costs imposed against a responsible party are to be distributed as follows: Five Fear dollars ($4.00) ($5.00) to the Clerk of the Courts as an administration fee, and the balance of the funds of each fine is to be deposited in the fine and forfeitures fund of the Sheriffs Office to offset the Sheriff's operating budget costs. SECTION TWO: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event that this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent Jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. 9 Text underlined is added; text s iek thr-e "`r' is deleted. 17G SECTION THREE: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The Provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE — ENFORCEMENT DEFERRED. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State, but shall not be enforced until 12:01 A.M. on the 1" day of November, 2001. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 2"6 day of e0a TDa t 9_ 52001. ATTESM" `ftttif CfibOF /f lF�,� •�``$- L, t *AP ' T BOARD 01, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS C3 Att a .`H to Chalr�an'j01,l.lI,R COUNTY, 11,01 `Icr1rlcrk J,1Nt1?S 1 . CARTF R. Ph.D., CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: d Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney 10 Text underlined is added; text stFuek through is deleted. 17G STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -56 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 23rd day of October, 2001, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 24th day of October, 2001. DWIGHT E. BROCK , Clerk of Courts..•'ai4d It zk. , Ex- officio to Board••of••:'r / -, "= County Commiss1b "V B Teri Michaels ' Deputy Clerk'.. '.V .may,,.. COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: ® Normal legal Advertisement (Display Adv., location, etc.) ❑ Other: i 4 Originating Dept/ Div: Public Utilities Division Person: Jim McGee Date: August 29, 2001 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance Petitioner: (Name & Address): Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before X BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appeari g 10 d s before heari a t=25,2001 Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): ❑ Naples Daily News ❑ Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: pages). Olfdiitarirre °an� xect t� it ur asnary At t, Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: ® Legally Required Consolidate the Utilities Standards and Procedures (88 Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? ® Yes ❑ No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 412 273511 649100 Reviewed by: Division Administrator Date List Attachments: Agenda Speakers List DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ❑ County Manager agenda file: to ❑ Requesting Division Clerk's Office ❑ Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ON Date Received: D Date of Public hearing: Date Advertised: J 171 ORDINANCE NO. 2000-X COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES AN ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS ESTABLISHING THE COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES; PROVIDING FINDINGS AND PURPOSE; PROVIDING TITLE AND CITATION; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF PREVIOUS ADOPTED WATER AND SEWER ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SERVICE AREAS BY THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER AUTHORITY; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR POLICIES AND STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL AND DOCUMENT SUBMISSIONS; PROVIDING FOR OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR UTILITIES CONVEYANCE PROCEDURES AND FORMS; PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE OF A UTILITY TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER, AND IRRIGATION FACILITIES; PROVIDING FOR PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NOS. 97-17,98-53 AND 2000 -53; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NOS. CWS -97 -2, MWS -97- 2, AND GWD -97 -2; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County and Resolved as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District, has determined that it is in the best interests of the public's health, safety, and welfare to establish the minimum utility requirements for development of potable water, wastewater, and irrigation water facilities within the unincorporated areas of Collier County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND RESOLVED AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, THE MARCO WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT AND THE GOODLAND WATER DISTRICT, that: 1 f TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE: FINDINGS AND PURPOSE ` ECTI €)N °TWO: TITLE AND CITATION SECTION THREE: APPLICABILITY SEC" HON F€ WR: WATER AND SEWER ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS SECTION FIVE: -SERVICE AREAS SUX "I" ON SIX: DEFINITIONS S[i:('1'10N Sl�XI% ]:N _ PO 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 7.9 LILIES AND STANDARDS Utility Service: Availability FDEP Permits Design and Performance Standard Manuals and Publications Utility Leases Construction Observation and Inspection Utilities Conveyance and Acceptance Utility Easement Building Permits — Connection Fees and Charges Certificates of Occupancy CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL & DOCUMENT I;C "'1 "I }N 1 If a11'(` SUBMISSION 8.1 General 8.2 Construction Documents 8.2.1 Preparation of Construction Documents 8.2.2 Presubmittal Conference 8.2.3 Submittals 8.2.4 Schedule of Fees and Charges 8.2.5 Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates 8.2.6 Ordinance 80-112 8.2.7 Rights- of-Way Permits 8.3 Fire Control District Approval RA 171 8.4 Plats 8.5 Utilities Performance Security 8.6 Construction Commencement 8.7 Construction Document Modification CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND INSPECTION 9.1 General 9.2 Pre-Construction Meeting 9.3 Construction Scheduling 9.4 Construction Observation and Inspection 9.4.1 General 9.4.2 Construction Inspections by County 9.4.3 Preliminary Inspections 9.4.4 Final Inspections IJt,:I'9(3r''l :fit. UTILITIES CONVEYANCE PROCEDURES ........................................................ ............................... 10.1 General 10.01.1 Water Line Acceptance 10.01.2 Gravity Sewer Line Acceptance 10.03.1 Lift Station and Force Main Acceptance 10.2 Conveyance Documents 10.3 Inspection 10.4 Record Construction Drawings 10.5 Bacterial Analysis 10.6 Final Costs 10.7 Test Results 10.8 Lift Station Submittals 10.9 Recordation Fees Not used 3 0 171 '� SI;CTION'I' ............ . _..._.................. I=;CVTION THIR`I TEN; ... AMENDMENTS SECTION I <`O R'I'EEN:...PENALTY SECTION TION FIF`T'EEN :..... REPEAL OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS SIFT "I "I()N SIXTEEN: ..... INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS & ORDINANCES SECTION SEVENTEEN: N: - CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY S1, .0 "TIC N 1AGII'I'I? EN.... EFFECTIVE DATE APPENDIX A - STANDARD LEGAL DOCUMENTS APPENDIX II - CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT CHECKLIST SECTION APPENDIX C - UTILITY DEVIATION FORM 11 • 171 SECTION ONE. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE It is the intent and purpose of this Ordinance to promote, protect, and improve the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Collier County by the establishment, herein, of standards and procedures for the construction, development, maintenance, and operation of safe, reliable water and wastewater systems, that meet the demands of Collier County's rapid land development and population growth and that are constructed, developed, maintained and operated according to the latest technical and professional standards. This Ordinance, therefore, establishes minimum utility requirements for development of water transmission and distribution and for wastewater collection and transmission facilities within the unincorporated areas of Collier County, Florida. This Ordinance attempts to ensure that, with respect to all utility construction performed reliable and economical utility services shall be provided to users of the water and /or wastewater systems within Collier County. All requirements set forth herein are in conjunction with and supplemental to the Collier County Land Development Code (the "LDC "), to the Collier County Growth Management Plan and to such other applicable Collier County Ordinances, Resolutions and/or regulations as are related to land development and /or subdivision of lands within Collier County. The administrative procedures, ordinances, and policies contained herein, as they apply to the extension and /or development of water and /or wastewater facilities and utility service, shall take precedence if in conflict, over those contained in the LDC. Public Utilities shall review variations, from the standards and procedures established herein, which are brought about by innovative applications of design principles /solutions to individual projects. Upon such review, the Public Utilities Administrator, in his discretion, may approve such variations, provided that, such variation shall not result in system/facility operation or maintenance performance that is less than that which would be provided, in this Ordinance, if recognized, accepted standards are used, and provided further that such variation promotes, protects, and improves the health, safety and welfare of Collier County, Florida. The Collier County Water -Sewer District, established in February 1977, by the Board of County Commissioners, was created for the following purposes: 1) to develop safe, reliable and financially self - supporting potable water and sanitary sewage systems which will meet the water and sewerage needs of the rapidly developing areas of Collier County; 2) to ensure that existing and future water and /or wastewater utility systems are constructed, operated and managed at the minimum cost to users and with no direct/indirect financial aid from the General Fund; and 3) to develop water and /or wastewater systems requiring the most reasonable operating and maintenance costs. 5 171 Section II (Wastewater Technical Specifications) and Section 12 (Water Technical Specifications) and Appendix C (Standard Details) have purposely been omitted. These documents are now included in the COLLIER UTILITIES TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL. By reference, the Public Utilities Administrator shall publish the MANUAL and provide for annual revisions thereto, consistent with good engineering practices and standards. SECTION TWO: TITLE AND CITATION This Ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the "Collier County Utility Standards and Procedures Ordinance." SECTION THREE: APPLICABILITY This Ordinance shall be applicable to development activities, within the unincorporated areas of Collier County, Florida. For the purposes of simplicity and brevity, references herein, to Collier County Water -Sewer District shall also refer to the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District, where appropriate, as the context requires. This Ordinance shall not apply to the Immokalee Water -Sewer District, which was created by Special Act of the State Legislature as an Independent District. SECTION FOUR: WATER AND SEWER ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS To implement the objectives set forth in this Ordinance, the Board of County Commissioners, acting in their regular capacity, as well as, the Ex- Officio Governing Board of the various water and /or sewer districts, has adopted Ordinances, Ordinance amendments and Resolutions on behalf of the County and the various Districts, and therefore, such Ordinances, Ordinance amendments and Resolutions, together with all such duly adopted subsequent Ordinances, Ordinance amendments and Resolutions relating to the standards and procedures regarding water and /or wastewater and /or irrigation water utilities within Collier County are incorporated in this Ordinance by reference. SECTION FIVE: SERVICE AREAS The following requirements shall apply with respect to the County's review of utility construction within Service Areas in the unincorporated area: 0 171 _ 5.1 Construction shall comply with the LDC and with the TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL. Requested deviations from the requirements of this Ordinance shall be referred to the Water and Wastewater Departments for resolution. 5.2 Within the Collier County Water and Wastewater certificated Service Areas and other Board approved Service Areas, which are granted to individual or joint development projects and which are providing interim utility service, the utility construction documents for each project shall comply with this Ordinance. Construction shall not commence until the documents have been reviewed and approved by the County and thereafter, the County has issued a written authorization to construct. Conveyance of completed interim utility facilities within these certificated or other approved Service Areas shall be in compliance with this Ordinance. h 17I SECTION SIX: DEFINITIONS 6.1 For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms, phrases, and words, shall have the meaning specified herein. When not inconsistent with the context, words in the present tense include future tense, words used in the singular number include the plural, and words used in the plural include the singular. "Shall" is always mandatory; "may" is discretionary. 6.2 Board: Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida, and, where appropriate, as the Ex- Officio Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, the Marco Water and Sewer District, and /or the Goodland Water District. 6.3 CCWSD or District: The Collier County Water -Sewer District, and the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District, where appropriate, as the context requires. 6.4 Construction Document: Construction drawings, technical specifications, hydraulic design reports, Florida Department of Environmental Protection ( "FDEP ") Permit Application, Plats, where required, and other supportive documents and data necessary to permit the review of proposed water and /or wastewater system improvements. 6.5 Contractor: Individual, partnership, agency, organization, corporation or the like licensed in the State of Florida to do underground utility construction in Collier County. 6.6 County: Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and when the context requires or warrants, shall refer to the Public Utilities Administrator and /or the Division designee. 6.7 County Inspector: A representative of Collier County designated to provide periodic inspection of all water and /or wastewater system construction. 6.8 Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAQ: The 15 member committee created pursuant to Ordinance No. 95 -60 to provide reports and recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners to assist in the enhancement of the operational efficiency and budgetary accountability within the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and to serve as a primary communications link between the Division, the development industry and the citizens of Collier County. • 17I 6.9 Community Development and Environmental Services Division: Division of Collier County which, for purposes of this Ordinance, shall be responsible for processing, reviewing and approving water and /or wastewater service requests, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance and /or the LDC, including the engineering evaluation, design and construction of public water and /or wastewater utility systems. As outlined herein, and as set forth in the LDC the "Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator" shall mean the site development review director and any successor in function. 6.10 CUE: Collier County Utility Easement. 6.11 Developer: An individual, partnership, corporation, owner, sub - divider, including a governmental agency, or designated agents, successors, or assigns, or such other entity that proposes and/or undertakes the construction of public water and /or wastewater facilities to provide service for any property or properties, area development or subdivision in which the water or wastewater facilities are to be extended from, connected to or ultimately become part of the water supply or wastewater system of Collier County Water -Sewer District, Collier County, Florida. 6.12 Distribution Mains: Potable or irrigation mains less than 16" in diameter that distribute water at the project or customer level. 6.13 Easement: An interest in land, granted to holder by owner of land. Such grant entitles holder to a specific limited use or enjoyment. Holder can be person, persons or the public generally. 6.14 Effluent: The treated liquid end product of a wastewater treatment facility, that is reused as reclaimed water for irrigation or other approved purposes. 6.15 Engineer of Record: The "Project Engineer," a registered professional engineer of record responsible for the preparation of plans and specifications and other related design documents for the water and /or wastewater facilities being constructed within Collier County, and responsible for certifying the project upon completion. 6.16 Fee: means the non - reimbursable monetary compensation rendered to the County for construction document review and inspection service provided. 6.17 F.A.C.: Florida Administrative Code. 9 171 ' 6.18 FDER Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State Agency responsible for regulating environmental programs and water and /or wastewater utility systems within the State of Florida. 6.19 FDOT.• Florida Department of Transportation. 6.20 Inspection: Periodic construction site visits by a County representative the purpose of which is to ascertain /insure compliance with County- approved construction documents. Such periodic visits shall occur during construction of the water and /or wastewater improvements, after completion of construction for preliminary acceptance prior to conveyance of the required water and /or wastewater facilities to the District, and after the one (1) year Contractual Guarantee period for final acceptance of the water and /or wastewater facilities by the County. 6.21 Interim Utility Facility: A water distribution, transmission treatment and /or supply facility, a wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and /or disposal facility, which, while under construction, is owned by the applicant/developer or other person /entity other than the CCWSD or other dependent District, and which, upon completion of construction, shall be dedicated to CCWSD or other dependent District. Such facilities shall remain interim if the CCWSD or other dependent District utility facilities are not available for connection and in such event, shall be leased back to the applicant/developer, pursuant to a Facilities Agreement, with operation and maintenance responsibilities, until such time as the CCWSD or other dependent District, where appropriate, are available for connection. 6.21A Irrigation System: Any and all plant, system, facility or property, and additions, extensions and improvements thereto at then future times, constructed or acquired as part thereof, useful or necessary or having the then present capacity for future use in connection with the development of sources, treatment or purification and distribution of irrigation water, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes dams, wells, meters, reservoirs, storage tanks, lines, valves, pumping stations, laterals and pipes for the purpose of carrying irrigation water to the premises connected with such system; also includes all real and personal property and any interest or rights therein, easements, and franchises of any nature whatsoever relating to any such system and necessary or convenient for the operation thereof 6.22 LDC: Collier County Land Development Code, as amended from time to time. 10 171 6.23 Lateral Sewer: A sewer which discharges into a branch or other sewer facilities and has only building sewers tributary to it. 6.24 Letter of Commitment: Written verification from a privately -owned or franchised utility as outlined in Sec. 7.1, which a Developer is required to submit to County prior to submittal of construction document. This Letter shall clearly verify the type and capacity of water and /or wastewater utility services available, as well as any restrictions or requirements the utility may have regarding issuance of a binding written commitment for service to a proposed development. 6.25 Master Plan Development: A tentative plan showing the proposed development of a tract of land for which development is to be carried out in one (1) or more stages. See: Site Alteration Plan, Site Development Plan, and Site Improvement Plan as described in LDC. 6.26 Modification: Revisions to construction documents, as requested by the Engineer of Record and which have been approved by the County, when such revision necessitates an additional review and approval process. Revisions requested by the County are exempt from this fee. 6.27 Non - Potable Water Facility: A facility used as a source of water for irrigation, cooling, or other uses. Facilities used as a source for drinking, culinary or domestic purposes are excluded from the definition of non - potable water supply wells. 6.28 Person or Entity: Individual, partnership, agency, association, private or public corporation, organization, or political subdivision or the like which desires to construct water and /or wastewater system improvements and /or requires the services of the County. 6.29 Potable Water Facility: Facility used as a source for drinking, culinary, or domestic purposes. 6.30 Probable Cost of Construction: Cost estimate prepared by the Engineer of Record for the water and /or wastewater system improvements submitted for review. 6.31 Project: Water and/or wastewater system improvements illustrated and described in the construction documents for the development of land in the unincorporated areas of Collier County. 11 17I !4_ 632 Public Utilities Division: Division of Collier County comprised of various departments including Water and Wastewater Departments. Public Utilities is responsible for the management, operation and maintenance of the Collier County Water -Sewer District. The Public Utilities Division, together with the Community Development and Environmental Services Division shall have the responsibility for approving water, wastewater, and, in some cases, effluent irrigation system requests and the engineering evaluation, including the design and construction for all County -owned water, wastewater and effluent irrigation systems as outlined within this Ordinance. Requested variation(s) from the requirements of this Ordinance shall be referred to the Water and Wastewater Departments for resolution and require a written response from the Public Utilities Administrator (PUA) in order to be implemented. 6.33 Right -of -Way: A strip of land, public or private, occupied or intended to be occupied by a street, crosswalk, railroad, electric transmission line, oil or gas pipeline, storm drainage way, water main, sanitary or storm sewer main, or for similar special use. The usage of the term "right - of -way" for land platting purposes shall mean that every right -of -way, whether public or private, or as an easement, hereafter established and shown on a plat is to be separate and distinct from the lots or parcels adjoining such right -of -way and not included within the dimensions or areas of such lots or parcels. 6.34 Sanitary Sewer Facility: A wastewater utility facility. 6.35 Service: Work incurred by the County to review and approve water and /or wastewater system construction documents and provide inspection during and after construction of said improvements. 6.36 Sewerage System, Central ( "Wastewater System, Central'): A system for the collection and disposal of sewage, in accordance with the approval of requisite federal, state, and county agencies. The system shall serve residential dwellings, commercial, industrial, institutional or other uses and shall include pipes, manholes, pumps, wet wells, tanks, treatment plants and other appurtenances, that comprise the system. 6.37 Sewerage System, Individual (Wastewater System, Individual'): A system designed to serve one unit (as defined in the health code used by Collier County) comprised of pipes, tanks, and subsurface absorption field, or other approved treatment device, for handling and disposing of sewage wastes. 12 171 6.38 Service Area: The geographical area described in a Franchise Certificate or other approval granted by the Board to a utility to provide utility service within the boundaries of a specified geographic area or areas and the geographical areas served by the Board. The geographical area may be referred to also as "territory," "service areas," or "certificated area." 6.39 Sewer Service: A gravity sewer pipe, that extends from the main sewer pipe to the customer's point of connection at the public right -of -way or the utility easement limit. 6.40 SFWMD: The South Florida Water Management District, established pursuant to Chapter 373, Fla. Stat. 6.41 Transmission Mains: Potable or irrigation mains 16" in diameter and larger that distribute water over a regional or sub - regional area. 6.42 Unincorporated Area: Areas lying outside any established corporate city or municipal boundary line and outside the boundaries of any independent Special Improvement District or service area established by the State Legislature for water and sewer service. 6.43 Utility: Any person or business entity, lessee, trustee and/or receiver, owning, operating, managing, or controlling a system, or proposing construction of a system, who or which is providing or proposes to provide potable water and /or non - potable water, or bulk water, and /or wastewater service, or any combination thereof, within any unincorporated area of the County to the public for compensation, but excluding only the following: a) Property used solely or principally in the business of bottling, selling, distributing or furnishing bottled water or portable treatment facilities; or b) Systems owned, operated, managed, or controlled by a Governmental Agency; or c) Manufacturers providing such utility service solely in connection with their own manufacturing operations; or d) Each public lodging establishment providing such utility service solely in connection with lodging service to its guests; or 13 17I e) Each landlord or Homeowners' Association providing utility service to their own tenants or unit owners without specific compensation for any such utility service; or f) Each water system and /or sewer system which has a rated capacity (at maximum day system peak) of less than 2,000 gallons per day per utility service; or g) Any Utility that derives less than fifty percent (50 %) of its revenues from unincorporated areas of the County with the balance derived from the incorporated area. Any Utility which derives fifty percent (50 %) or more of its revenues from the unincorporated areas of the County shall be subject to the provisions of this Ordinance as they relate to only the rates, fees, and charges charged by the Utility in its unincorporated area(s); or h) Any utility system that is then serving less than one hundred (100) customers with water and /or sewer service. For the purpose of this subparagraph, a "customer" is not each individual served. Each residence, apartment unit, condominium unit, office or other unit of a building or structure, each mobile home, each recreational vehicle, etc., is one (1) customer. A duplex is two (2) customers; a triplex is three (3) customers, etc. i) Systems solely for tenants or occupants of. governmental buildings, religious, educational or cultural institutions or facilities, or for recreational, scientific or institutional facilities. j) Systems not owned by a Franchisee that are downline from the Franchisee's master meter and are operated and sub metered by a master metered customer of the Franchisee for resale to individual residential or commercial consumers occupying property owned or otherwise lawfully controlled by that master metered customer. 14 171 6.44 Utility Code Subcommittee of DSAC: A subcommittee of DSAC, created pursuant to Ordinance No. 95 -60 to review and make recommendations on technical and other issues relating to utility matters and to act as a liaison between the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and the Public Utilities Division on such matters. 6.45 Utilities Performance Security (UPS): A Performance Bond, Cash Bond or an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, or other authorized form of security furnished by a community development district pursuant to the LDC, furnished by the Developer to the County or the District, prior to commencement of construction, for all water and wastewater construction to guarantee the construction and the workmanship and materials for the warranty period after the utility facilities have been conveyed to the County or appropriate Water -Sewer District, or upon completion of the utility facilities when construction occurs on private property. See Sec. 8.5 for specific details on this Performance Security. 6.46 Water Service: A water service installation which includes: tapping saddle, corporation stop, service line and meter installation, meter box and backflow prevention device, if required, extended to property line or utility easement limit. 6.47 Wastewater: "Sewage," or "sewerage," means a combination of the liquid and water - carried pollutants from a residence, commercial building, industrial plant, or institution, together with any groundwater, surface runoff, or leachate that may be present. 6.48 Wastewater System: "Sewer," "sewer system," or "sewerage system" means any and all plant, system, facility or property, and additions, extensions and improvements thereto at any future time constructed to acquire as part thereof, useful or necessary or then having capacity for future use in connection with the collection, treatment, purification and disposal of sewage of any nature, originating from any source, and without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes treatment plants, pumping stations, lift stations, valves, force mains, intercepting sewers, laterals, pressure lines, mains, and all necessary appurtenances and equipment; also includes all wastewater mains and laterals for the reception and collection of sewage from premises connected therewith; also includes all real and personal property and any interest therein, rights, easements, and franchises of any nature relating to any such system and necessary or convenient for the operation thereof. 15 171 .. 6.49 Water System: Any and all plant, system, facility or property, and additions, extensions and improvements thereto at then future times, constructed or acquired as part thereof, useful or necessary or having the then present capacity for future use in connection with the development of sources, treatment or purification and distribution of water, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes dams, reservoirs, storage tanks, lines, valves, pumping stations, laterals and pipes for the purpose of carrying water to the premises connected with such system; also includes all real and personal property and any interest or rights therein, easements, and franchises of any nature whatsoever relating to any such system and necessary or convenient for the operation thereof SECTION SEVEN: POLICIES AND STANDARDS 7.1 Utility Service: Availability As a requirement to Developer's submittal of construction documents, Developer shall obtain prior written verification, from the Public Utilities Division, which shall 1) ascertain the current status of utility service, if any; 2) identify restrictions, if any, of availability of such services; 3) provide pertinent facts regarding location and availability of County's existing and /or proposed utility systems. The Division shall respond in writing to all such requests. Provided that, if current and available County utility facilities do not exist, Developer shall provide, or otherwise obtain, interim utility service, only, to the subject property. In the event the proposed development is outside the service area of the CCWSD, but within the Service Area of a private or franchised utility company, a Letter of Commitment for service must be submitted from the private or franchised utility outside its Service Area upon approval by the Board. The Letter shall clearly describe the type and capacity of the utility services available, as well as any restrictions or requirements the Utility may have regarding the issuance of a binding written commitment for service to the proposed development. In the event that central water and /or wastewater service is not available to a proposed project, it shall be the Developer's responsibility to clearly and fully detail the steps that will be taken to provide interim utility services. 7.2 FDEP Permits 16 r 171 With respect to development and /or release of FDEP Construction Permit Applications from the Community Development and Environmental Services Division, approval of the construction documents for the water and /or wastewater facilities is mandatory before the County executes and releases applications for any required FDEP permits. Prior to commencement of construction, FDEP permit must be issued. Provided that, with respect to development of and /or construction activities for an interim utility facility, the Developer may obtain executed FDEP permit applications prior to County's final written approval of construction documents. However, under no circumstances shall construction commence with such an interim utility facility until the construction commencement criteria in Section 8.6 have been met. With respect to those service areas outside the CCWSD, copies of all approved FDEP construction and operating permits shall be submitted to the County immediately upon issuance and receipt. With respect to the FDEP Certification of Completion of Construction forms, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division will have the forms executed by the Public Utilities Division after they receive the Preliminary Inspection approval letter during the Preliminary Acceptance process. Community Development and Environmental Services will release the forms as soon as they are returned to them. 7.3 Design and Performance Standard Manuals and Publications The minimal, but mandatory, utility design requirements of this Ordinance are established by the most recent technical standards, procedures and criteria, as set forth in the latest edition of the publications, listed below, and as are supplemented by the standards specifically set forth in the Technical Standards Manual. The minimal, but mandatory, utility design requirements set forth in the listed publications are incorporated herein and are, thereby, an integral part of this Ordinance. Deviation from the established criteria, as set forth below in the manuals /publications, is not precluded, provided that, the Engineer of Record shall provide, for County's review, a design deviation based on such rational criteria that promotes, protects, and /or improves the public's health, safety and welfare and upon such showing, receives the County's prior written approval. County approval shall not be granted to any proposed design that jeopardizes the public health, safety and welfare, or that otherwise would result in a system performance less than that which would otherwise be provided to the public by adherence to the recognized and accepted industry standards set forth in the following manuals /publications: 17 17I 7.3.1 Water Pollution Control Federation, Manual of Practice No. 8, Wastewater Treatment Plant Design, W.P.C.F., 2626 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. 7.3.2 Water Pollution Control Federation, Manual of Practice No. 9, Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers, W.P.C.F., 2626 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. 7.3.3 Great Lakes /Upper Mississippi River Board of State Sanitary Engineers, 1978 or latest edition. Recommended Standards for Sewage Works, Health Education Service, Inc., P.O. Box 7283, Albany, New York 12224. 7.3.4 Great Lakes /Upper Mississippi River Board of State Sanitary Engineers, 1982 or latest edition. Recommended Standards for Water Works, Health Education Service, Inc., P.O. Box 7283, Albany, New York 12224. 7.3.5 Rules of the Department of Environmental Protection, Chapter 17 -6, Wastewater Facilities and Chapter 17 -22, Water Suppliers. 7.3.6 American Water Works Association, Inc., Water Treatment Plant Design. AWWA, 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado, 80235. 7.3.7 American Water Works Association, AWWA Standards. AWWA, 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80235. 7.3.8 Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association, Handbook, Ductile Iron Pipe /Cast Iron Pipe. Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association, 245 Riverchase Parkway East, Birmingham, Alabama 35244. 7.3.9 Uni -Bell Plastic Pipe Association, Handbook of PVC Pipe, Uni -Bell Plastic Pipe Association, 2655 Villa Creek Drive, Suite 164, Dallas, Texas 75234. 7.3. 10 American National Standards Institute, latest revision. 7.3.11 American Society for Testing and Materials, Volumes 1.02, 4.01, 4.02, 4.05, 6.02. 7.3.12 American Water Works Association, Inc., AWWA Manual, M -14, 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80235. FRO • 171 7.3.13 American Water Works Association, Inc., AWWA Manual, M -22, 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80235. 7.3.14 Collier County Utilities Technical Standards Manual 7.4 Utility Leases Water and /or wastewater facilities constructed for a development which cannot immediately connect to a District owned - and - operated system shall be dedicated to the Board, or as appropriate to the context, the Marco Water and Sewer District or the Goodland Water District, and, at the time of such dedication, shall be leased -back to the Owner of such water and /or wastewater treatment facility. Such facility shall be deemed an interim utility facility for the lease term, i.e., until such time, as such facility is capable of and is, in fact, connected to a District owned - and - operated system. At no time shall the District operate and /or maintain an interim utility facility. The terms and conditions of such lease term shall be set forth pursuant to a written lease agreement, "Facilities Agreement," executed by and between the Owner /Developer and Board /District, the standard form of which is set forth in Appendix A, as may be amended. The Facilities Agreement shall further set forth the terms, conditions, and mutual responsibilities of the signatory parties, their successors, and assigns, with respect to the dedication, the lease -back, the operation and maintenance of such interim utility facility, and the ultimate connection to the off -site facility owned and operated by the Board. Each Facility Agreement shall be negotiated on a case -by -case basis, agreed to and executed by and between the parties prior to construction commencement of the proposed facilities. Such Facilities Agreement shall be a part of the legal documents to be approved and accepted by the Board at the time that the water and /or wastewater facilities are conveyed to the Board. Project developers, their successors, or assigns, shall be responsible for costs incurred by County in order to maintain interim utility facilities in compliance with FDEP water quality regulations. Such costs shall be borne by the Developers, their successors, or assigns, until sufficient construction has occurred, to create usage significant enough to properly maintain the system without additional maintenance activities on the part of County. Charges for water used shall be billed at the District irrigation rate. 7.5 Construction Observation and Inspection 19 171 The construction of all water and /or wastewater facilities must be observed and certified by the Engineer of Record and be inspected by the County. The nature and extent of the construction observation and inspection is detailed in Section 9.4. 7.6 Utilities Conveyance and Acceptance The transfer of ownership of any utility facility, including an interim utility facility, to the District shall comply with the requirements of law, as set forth in the Florida Statutes, County Resolutions, and /or Ordinance Nos. 78 -10 and 79 -33, as amended and /or their successors. Reference Section 10: Utility Conveyance Procedures. 7.7 Utility Easement All uses of Collier County utility easements (CUE) shall be in accordance with this Ordinance or other Board approved uses and shall be for the exclusive sub - surface use of the Board or other County approved uses. All CUEs shall comply with relevant LDC requirements, unless specifically authorized to do otherwise, in writing by the Water and/or Wastewater Directors. Any other use of a CUE not authorized by County and /or approved by the Board is prohibited, other than service crossings. Any use of a CUE that creates a hazard to the water and /or wastewater facilities or the employees of the Board /County /CCWSD in the performance of their duties is prohibited. Private road right -of -ways with CUE overlays are exempt from the exclusive use provision, however, all design setback and construction requirements of the Ordinance shall be adhered to. Privately -owned utilities may be allowed within a CUE, subject to prior approval by the County, and provided that such privately -owned utility does not hinder operation and maintenance activities or does not create an unnecessary financial burden to the rate payers of the District. Aboveground improvements such as, but not limited to, paved parking, decorative walls and landscaping shall be permitted to be installed within a CUE by the grantor, its successors or assigns. However, the cost of any and all repair, replacement, maintenance and restoration of the aforementioned improvements shall be the sole financial responsibility of the grantor, its successors or assigns as set forth in the County's standard CUE language. Combined water -sewer easements shall be agreed upon on a case -by -case basis, dependent on depth of lines and shall not be combined, unless and until approved by the Water and Wastewater Directors and the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. M 171 '.. Width of Easements. a) Minimum width of water main, force main, and /or effluent main easements shall be 15 feet. b) Minimum width of gravity sewer easements shall be twice the depth of the line or 15 feet, whichever is greater; and c) Lift station easements shall be twice the depth by twice the depth of the lift station or 30 feet by 30 feet, whichever is greater; and d) Combined water -sewer easements shall be agreed upon on a case -by -case basis, dependent upon depth of lines. Minimum distance between water and sewer lines shall be 10 feet as required by FDEP and this Ordinance. 7.8 Building Permits — Connection Fees and Charges County shall not approve the issuance of a building permit until the utility construction documents, together with the associated Plat has been reviewed and approved pursuant to the LDC, and all appropriate water and /or wastewater system development charges, impact fees and connection fees have been paid. The Developer shall be responsible for coordinating development activities with the County, to ensure that all the necessary utility construction documents, plats, etc., are submitted for review and approval. Temporary use permits shall be exempt from the utility construction document approval requirement prior to Building Permit approval, unless specific conditions preclude such exemption. 7.9 Certificates of Occupancy A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued for any structure prior to preliminary acceptance of all water and /or wastewater facilities required by this Ordinance or the LDC. SECTION EIGHT: CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL AND DOCUMENT SUBMISSIONS 8.1 General This section establishes the County's minimum requirements, pursuant to, or in addition to, the minimum LDC requirements, for the submission of the following construction documents, by the W to 171 Developer /Owner and /or Contractor, for County's review; however, County may require additional data, as County deems necessary, to complete its review of: a) Water and /or wastewater facilities for proposed new developments connected to existing water and /or wastewater systems; and b) Water and /or wastewater facilities for proposed new developments to be served by interim water and /or wastewater treatment plants. 8.2 Construction Documents 8.2.1 Preparation of Construction Documents. Construction drawings and technical specifications for the construction, extension and/or modification of water and /or wastewater facilities shall be prepared by, or under the supervision of, and shall be certified by the Engineer of Record, a Professional Engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Florida, under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes. 8.2.2 Presubmittal Conference. It is recommended that prior to initial submission to County of construction documents, the Owner /Developer or their authorized agent, (the "applicant ") confer with the Public Utilities Administrator and Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator to obtain information and guidance, to initiate an informal preliminary review, pursuant to the LDC, as may be amended, before substantial commitments of" time and /or money are made in preparation and submission of further documentation. 8.2.3 Submittals. Unless instructed otherwise at the Presubmittal Conference, initial submittal of construction documents, together with any supportive materials, shall be submitted to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator or designee and shall be accompanied by a descriptive cover letter. The cover letter shall contain, but not be limited to, the following: a. Project Name. b. Location of Project. c. Type of utility construction proposed. d. Estimated number of water and sewer users to be served by the proposed construction. 22 171 . e. Explanation of what action the County is being requested to take regarding the materials submitted. f. List of documents attached. g. Engineer's Report - A concise report summarizing the proposed construction including connections, phasing, assumptions and estimated flows. In the event the proposed construction is part of a proposed subdivision development and plat review process, applicant shall additionally follow, unless set forth otherwise, herein, the "Development Requirements" procedures set forth in LDC, as may be amended. LDC references to Ordinance 88 -76 shall for all purposes be deemed references to this Ordinance. The County requires complete data and information with this initial submission in order to efficiently provide the necessary review. For this reason, a "standard transmittal" form will not be acceptable for the initial submission. However, transmittal forms may be utilized for the subsequent submittal of revised documents, additional items requested by the County and other information pertinent to the review and approval process. 8.2.4 Schedule of Fees and Charges. The Board shall establish by Resolution, a Schedule of Fees and Charges for construction document processing, inspection services and sales. The Schedule shall be posted in the Division of Community Development and Environmental Services. The Resolution shall be filed with the Clerk to the Board. The Schedule may be changed from time to time, pursuant to standard resolution adoption and amendment procedures. The Construction Document Review Fee shall be submitted with the construction document submission. The Construction Document Review Resubmission Fee shall be required if County's review requires a third review, in addition to the initial review and one resubmission. The resubmission fee shall be submitted at the time the third submission is made. The Construction Inspection Fee shall be submitted prior to the final construction plan approval. The Construction Document Modification fee shall be submitted upon written request by the County prior to final approval of the modifications requested. The Developer shall be responsible for the payment of all fees identified above. 8.2.5 Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate. The Engineer of Record shall furnish three (3) complete sets of the construction drawings and two (2) sets of the technical specifications or, as otherwise required by the LDC. Construction drawings shall be prepared on standard size 24" x 23 0 171 36" sheets. Technical specifications shall be typewritten on 8 -1/2" x 11" sheets and bound in an acceptable manner. Technical specifications shall include an estimate of probable construction cost, prepared by the Engineer of Record, which contains a summary of quantities and estimate of installed cost for the water and /or wastewater facilities proposed for construction. The cost estimate shall be prepared by the Engineer of Record and submitted in itemized form to include the cost of all required improvements or the contract bid price for all work necessary to complete the required improvements. Incorporation of technical specifications into the construction drawings, in lieu of a separate set of written specifications as described above, shall not be acceptable, unless written waiver is granted by the Public Utilities Administrator or his designee. The construction documents shall be submitted to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for review and written approval prior to the commencement of construction. The construction documents shall consist of, but not be limited to: a) Cover Sheet with Location Map b) Site Utility Master Plan, indicating the overall site development and all proposed utility improvements including easements, with references to the appropriate plan and profile sheets. if phasing of the project is proposed, phases shall be indicated on this drawing. For proposed points of connection to existing water and /or wastewater facilities, the site utility plan shall indicate the method and materials to be used. Actual location of existing sewer mains or laterals and water lines stubs shall be shown, where applicable c) Identification of individual lots for subdivisions and /or buildings and structures for condominiums, multi- family projects, etc.; d) For all projects, except single - family subdivisions, the proposed meter location to service each structure shall be illustrated (final meter sizes shall be determined by the Collier County customer service representative.) For preliminary meter sizing, see impact fee Ordinance, as amended, superseded or consolidated. e) All existing utility easements on the particular property shall be shown on the drawings. Proposed easements may be required to be shown if the site working space is confined, as determined by County on a case -by -case basis. Easements No 171 required to be shown, shall be clearly labeled and shall show the width and limits. See Section 10.2.1 -2. f) Plan and profile sheets shall indicate the horizontal and vertical locations for all water and /or wastewater improvements, including all appurtenances, as well as, other proposed and /or existing facilities, together with all conflicts in the same general location. Special profile sheets shall be required when unique situations or complex conflicts occur that cannot be clearly detailed on standard plan and profile forms. Profiles shall be positioned on the sheet directly below the plan section they are illustrating, with the exception of utilities, that will not be owned and maintained by Collier County. For such utilities that are not owned and maintained by Collier County, profiles shall be provided, but do not have to be positioned on the sheet directly below the plan section. g) Water and /or wastewater standard details. Use of the technical standards contained in the COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY STANDARDS TECHNICAL MANUAL shall be required for all construction projects. Pavement restoration, backfill standards, compaction requirements, etc., regarding work. within the public rights -of -way or CUE shall be governed by the rules and regulations established by the Public Utilities Division. Standard details involving these items shall reflect the requirements of the Public Utilities Division h) Complete Lift Station drawings, specifications, as required, and details including shop drawings, when necessary, shall be submitted. A special site plan of the lift station and appurtenances shall be provided. It shall contain specific details on the configuration of the station, location of appurtenances, such as electric service and transformers, guard posts, control panel, fencing, landscaping, etc., and the proposed location with respect to roadways, sidewalks or bike paths, driveways and proposed or existing rights -of -way or utility easements. i) Water and wastewater system hydraulic calculations. W, 7 j) Construction plans shall include a symbols and abbreviations legend. k) A list of all County inspections that require 48 notice. 1) A statement as to who owns and maintains the onsite water and sewer systems. 8.2.6. Ordinance 80 -112. When connection to a central wastewater system, other than those operated and maintained by the County or an appropriate Water -Sewer District, is proposed, the requirements of County Ordinance No. 80 -112 and amendments or successor Ordinance thereto shall be satisfied and shall comply with Sec. 7.1 herein: "Utility Service: Availability." 8.2.7 Rights -of -Way Permits. Construction within dedicated public rights-of-way shall require an approved permit from the appropriate governmental County, State and /or Federal agency. A copy of the approved permit shall be submitted, to the County, prior to the project pre - construction meeting. Utility construction within a right -of -way owned by the State of Florida, shall require a FDOT Utility Permit. When companion FDEP permit applications must be obtained, they will be released for processing prior to final FDOT permit approval, provided the construction documents are satisfactory to the Public Utilities Administrator. 8.3 Fire Control District Approval All construction drawings containing water distribution facilities shall be reviewed by and shall require written approval by the appropriate independent Fire Control Districts. Fire hydrant location design shall be in compliance with the LDC or NFPA Regulations, latest edition, whichever is more restrictive. The Fire Control District must provide the County with a letter approving the number and location of the fire protection facilities to serve the project. This letter shall contain an agreement by the Fire Control District to accept the ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the hydrants after construction is complete pursuant to the established policy of each individual Fire Control District on the effective date of this Ordinance. The Public Utilities Division will be responsible for the fire hydrant lead up to and including the gate valve as specified in the UTILITIES TECHNICAL MANUAL unless the Fire Districts do not accept ownership of the fire hydrants and leads after the isolation valve in which case the entire lead and fire hydrant should be dedicated to the County. 26 171 .: Upon completion of the water system construction, the Engineer of Record must provide to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator or designee, field fire -flow testing documentation that establishes that adequate fire -flow capabilities exist. The Engineer of Record must incorporate demand capacity and meter sizing data into the construction drawings for those projects which utilize a master water meter, to which fire hydrants shall be connected, which establish that the water meter selected does pass the total flows required by the project. The County or appropriate Water -Sewer District shall not be responsible for, and /or shall be held harmless from any damages, or loss, resulting from inadequate sizing of a water meter to supply fire flow, in addition to domestic coincident drafts, for a particular project. Data on the meter sizing analysis shall also be contained in the hydraulic design report discussed in Paragraph 8.2.3(g). 8.4 Plats A copy of the proposed plat for new subdivisions that contain water and /or wastewater facilities shall be submitted with the construction drawings to the County for review and approval. All utility easements that will be required for the water and /or wastewater facilities shall be shown on the plat, if possible. Further, the dedication block on the cover sheet shall contain statements for the following: a) That all Utility Easements for water and /or wastewater facilities and Ingress and Egress rights, where appropriate, are provided to Collier County and the appropriate Water -Sewer District to install, operate and maintain water and /or wastewater utility facilities within the Platted Area; and b) Applicable water and/or wastewater facilities constructed within this Platted Area shall be conveyed to the Board for the appropriate Water -Sewer District upon acceptance of the improvements required by the Plat. All plats shall include a signature block for the Board, (or where appropriate, the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District). Final approval of construction documents for a project will not be made until the Board pursuant to the LDC requirements has duly approved the proposed plat. Plats submitted and approved by the Board shall be in complete accordance with this Ordinance. Any requests for deviations from this Ordinance shall be clearly outlined in the executive summary, with a copy sent to the affected Department(s). Deviations 27 r 171 approved as part of the plat shall not be valid unless clearly outlined in the applicant's submittal letter. If a plat is not required for a specific project, the Engineer of Record shall provide documentation confirming that fact so that the County can determine the extent of utility easements that must be provided. 8.5 Utilities Performance Security The Developer shall be required to furnish a utilities performance security ( "UPS ") in an amount equal to 110% of the Engineer's Probably Cost of Construction for Water and /or Wastewater Facilities. The Developer shall submit the UPS with the final construction documents; the UPS must be approved by the Collier County Attorney's Office prior to commencement of utility construction. A UPS is not required for the construction phase of a project, provided development is occurring on private, un- subdivided property, or if the UPS has been previously provided to the County, pursuant to the LDC requirements. The UPS shall be required on all projects during the guarantee or warranty period as described herein. Upon conveyance of utility facilities to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County as the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida, and Ex- Officio the Governing Board for the appropriate Water -Sewer Districts, the Developer may request a reduction in the UPS in an amount equal to ten percent (10 %) of the probable cost of utility construction for the required guarantee or warranty period. For completion of facilities constructed on private, un- subdivided property, a ten percent (l0 %) UPS must be provided to, and accepted by, the County prior to preliminary acceptance of the completed utility facilities. Whenever reasonably possible, the UPS amount shall be based on the actual bid price of the water and /or wastewater facilities. Whenever a bid price is utilized, a copy of the accepted bidders proposal form must be submitted with the UPS. The UPS shall be held by the County and shall secure and cover the performance of the Developer in construction and maintaining the subject water and /or wastewater improvements. Acceptable types of UPSs shall be a Performance Bond, a Cash Bond or an irrevocable Letter of Credit. No other form of security will be accepted unless a waiver of the requirements herein is granted by the Board. All surety companies associated with a performance Bond shall hold a current Certificate of Authority, as issued by the Treasury Department, as an acceptable surety on federal bonds under an Act of Congress approved July 30, 1947. Attorneys -in -fact who sign a Performance Bond must file with the Bond a certified copy of their Power of Attorney Certificate. The Bond must either be signed, or countersigned by a Florida U:3 171 "1 resident agent. The surety shall be directly responsible to the County, should the bond have to be utilized to complete any repairs or work on the project. The issuer of any Letter of Credit shall be a federally insured and regulated savings and loan association or commercial bank, authorized to do and doing business in the State of Florida. Any Letter of Credit must be irrevocable and address both the construction and maintenance obligations of the Developer in a form acceptable to the Collier County Attorney. The beneficiary of any Letter of Credit shall be the Board. The beneficiary of a Letter of Credit provided as a UPS shall be entitled to draw on the Letter of Credit if: 1) the Developer has failed to construct or maintain the subject water and /or wastewater improvements; or 2) if the Letter of Credit is scheduled to expire prior to final inspection, as described in paragraph 10.3 hereof, and alternative performance security has not been provided and accepted in accordance with this Ordinance within three (3) business days prior to the expiration date. A final inspection of the subject water and /or wastewater facilities shall be conducted prior to release of a UPS. All construction and maintenance obligations covered by a UPS shall be guaranteed and maintained by the Developer until satisfactory completion of the final inspection. To schedule the final inspection, the County shall provide written notice to the Engineer of Record, if practicable, approximately thirty (30) days prior to the completion of the one -year period from the facilities acceptance by the County. The representatives of the County, Engineer of Record, Contractor, and Developer shall conduct final inspection. The UPS shall remain, at all times, in full force and effect until the county provides written notification that the final inspection has been satisfactorily completed. Upon such written notification, the County shall return and release the UPS to the Project Engineer or the Developer's designated agent. 8.6 Construction Commencement Water and /or wastewater facilities construction shall commence only after receipt of the following: a) Final written approval of the construction documents, or M W 171 b) Preliminary Work Authorization (PWA) approval as outlined in LDC. 2. FDEP construction permits for the water and /or wastewater systems. 3. Any other permit that may be required for water and /or wastewater construction, including, but not limited to, a SFWMD ERP or MSW, ACOE Dredge -Fill, NPDES, FDOT, etc. 4. Pre - construction meeting as outlined in Section 9.2. 8.7 Construction Document Modification The County prior to construction must approve all modifications to County- approved construction documents. The Engineer of Record shall submit a Construction Document Modification including a written technical description of all modifications, the review fee, and the revised construction drawings to the County for written approval prior to construction. SECTION NINE: CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND INSPECTION 9.1 General Installation of all water and /or wastewater facilities and /or connections to existing utility facilities within the County shall be observed and inspected by qualified professional and technical personnel. Construction observation and inspection is required to ensure that the facilities accepted by the Board have been installed in substantial accordance with the County- approved construction drawings and technical specifications. Construction observation and inspection is further necessary to ensure that the County and the water and /or wastewater Districts shall receive utility facilities that require minimum capital expenditure for operation and maintenance. 9.2 Pre - Construction Meeting Upon County approval of a project's construction documents and prior to the commencement of construction, a pre- construction meeting shall be conducted, pursuant to the LDC. The pre - construction meeting shall be held in the offices of the County or, if deemed appropriate, at the office of the Engineer of Record. Representatives of the County, the Applicants, the Engineer of Record, the Utility Companies, the Contractor and the Developer shall attend the pre- construction meeting, where necessary. At the pre - construction meeting, a schedule of construction activities 30 171 ? and copies of all applicable state and federal permits shall be provided to the County representative(s). At least 48 hours written notice shall be provided for scheduling the pre - construction meeting with the County. Should any utilities construction commence prior to the pre - construction meeting, the County shall have the right to require partial or full exposure of all completed work for observation, inspection and verification that the utilities were installed in substantial accordance with the approved construction documents and technical specifications. 9.3 Construction Scheduling All water and/or wastewater facilities construction in right -of -way areas including pressure testing and sewer lamping shall be completed in substantial accordance with the approved construction plans and technical specifications prior to proceeding with the stabilization of the roadway subgrade. Installation of improvements, that would complicate corrective work on the water and /or wastewater facilities, shall be considered in scheduling all adjoining or related phases of the construction. The County shall be notified within 24 hours, with written follow -up, of any problems and/or conflicts with the construction of required improvements as they affect the completion of the proposed facilities in substantial accordance with the approved construction plans and technical specifications. Failure to comply with this regulation shall constitute just cause for the issuance of a Stop Work Order by the County; and the County shall have the right to require partial or full exposure of any related work which has been completed in order to observe, inspect, and verify that the utilities were installed in substantial accordance with the approved construction plans and technical specifications. 9.4 Construction Observation and Inspection 9.4.1 General Pursuant to the F.A.C., Chapters 17 -6 and 17 -22, the construction of water and /or wastewater facilities requires a Professional Engineer ( "P.E. ") to certify the construction was completed in substantial accordance with the approved construction plans and technical specifications. The certification must be based upon on -site observation of construction; therefore, all water and/or wastewater facilities construction shall require on -site construction observation complying with the LDC and F.A.C., Chapters 17- 6.140(5)3 and 17- 22.108(6)4, as may be amended. The construction observation shall be performed by a P.E. licensed to practice in the State of Florida or a designated technical representative under the P.E.'s direction. 31 171 __ The P.E.'s certification of construction compliance with County- approved construction documents, verifies that the water and/or wastewater facilities are constructed in compliance with Record Drawings. Reference Section 10: Utilities Conveyance Procedures. 9.4.2 Construction Inspections by County Upon final approval of construction documents by the County, the Engineer of Record will be provided with a list of standard inspections that require the presence of a County representative. All required inspections shall be identified in the County's approval letter for the project. Based upon the scheduling and progress of construction, the Engineer of Record or applicant's contractor shall be responsible for requesting County inspections. Written requests for inspections shall be provided to the County at least 48 hours prior to the requested inspection to allow scheduling of the County Inspector. Verbal confirmation of the inspection time or a request to reschedule the inspection during the County inspection, the Engineer of Record or his /her designated representative will be available on -site. Routine County inspections will be carried out without notice on all water and /or wastewater facilities construction to ensure compliance with the approved construction documents. In the event the County Inspector, or an employee of the Public Utilities Division, during an on -site inspection, find construction in progress which does not comply with the procedures and policies contained herein and /or the approved construction documents, the County Inspector, or employee of the Public Utilities Division shall have full authority to issue a Stop Work Order. Such Stop Work Order shall remain in full force and effect, with respect to the defective work, until the documented discrepancies have been corrected and to the full satisfaction of the Public Utilities Division. Construction - related inspections, where applicable, shall include, but not be limited, to the following: a) Hot taps to water and sewer facilities.* b) Master meter and bypass piping. c) Jack & Bore casings. d) Pressure tests.* e) Infiltration /Exfiltration tests. f) Lift station installation, prior to cover -up and start-up. 32 171 g) Lift station start-up.* h) Lamping of sewer lines. i) Flushing of sewer lines, force mains, water mains and effluent lines.* j) Television video taping of sewer lines at end of construction and the warranty period ( "in -office review "). k) Fire hydrant thrust blocks. 1) Conflict box construction.* m) Connections to existing water and sewer facilities.* n) Casing installations. o) Other special requirements as specified by the County at the time of construction document approval. The County must be present at the inspections noted with " *" above. 9.4.3 Preliminary Inspections A preliminary inspection of the completed facilities is required prior to any conveyance to and acceptance by the Board. During this inspection, the utilities will be checked for compliance with the approved construction drawings and /or approved revised construction drawings. All facilities must be in full compliance with the County- approved record construction drawings, or County - approved revised construction drawings, prior to conveyance to the Board for acceptance. Reference Section 10: Utilities Conveyance Procedures. 9.4.4 Final Inspections The final inspection shall be conducted no earlier than one (1) year after acceptance and conveyance of the utility facilities by the Board. During this inspection, the utility facilities shall be examined for any defect in materials and workmanship and for physical and operational compliance with the County- approved record construction drawings. The UPS shall remain in effect until the final inspection has been satisfactorily completed and the Developer is so notified in writing. Reference Section 10: Utilities Conveyance Procedures. 33 SECTION TEN: UTILITIES CONVEYANCE PROCEDURES 10.1 General Water and /or wastewater facilities, constructed pursuant to the standards and procedures established herein shall be conveyed to and accepted by the Board. Preliminary acceptance shall be approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator or designee. Final acceptance shall be approved by the Board after the one (1) year warranty period and the Final Inspection. 10.1.1 Water Line Acceptance 1. Board shall accept for ownership and operation potable water systems with pipes six inches (6) or greater in diameter, including the water meter and /or backflow device with the exception of internal potable water distribution (PWD) systems The for such facilities as rental apartments, shopping centers, strip malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile home parks or any other multi - family projects that cannot or do not provide the required CUEs paralleling a typical single family street cross - section or any other project that does not comply with or meet the intention of this Ordinance. 2. Gravity Sewer Line Acceptance. The Board shall accept for ownership and operation gravity wastewater collection systems with pipes eight inches (8 ") or greater in diameter with the exception of internal gravity wastewater collection systems for such facilities as rental apartments, shopping centers, strip malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile homes parks or any other multi - family projects with gravity wastewater collection systems that cannot or do not provide the required CUEs paralleling a typical single family street cross - section. The gravity wastewater collection system shall lie within a CUE if it is to be owned and operated by the Board. The minimum acceptable as -built slope shall not be more than 10% below the allowable slope or 10% less than the design slope See Section 17- 6.140(a)2 Florida Administrative Code, for details. 34 v 171 All non - potable reuse irrigation water systems not currently owned by or required to be owned by the District shall be owned and maintained, in their entirety by the applicant, his successors or assigns, from the connection valve from the County Master Meter at the entrance to the project. 10.1.2 Gravity Sewer Line Acceptance. The Board shall accept for ownership and operation gravity wastewater collection systems with pipes eight inches (8 ") or greater in diameter with the exception of internal gravity wastewater collection systems for such facilities as rental apartments, shopping centers, strip malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile homes parks or any other multi- family projects with gravity wastewater collection systems that cannot or do not provide the required CUEs paralleling a typical single family street cross- section. The gravity wastewater collection system shall lie within a CUE if it is to be owned and operated by the Board. 10.1.3 Lift Station and Force Main Acceptance. The Board shall accept for ownership and operation wastewater collection systems including force mains with pipes four inches (4 ") or greater in diameter and lift stations with the exception of internal wastewater collection systems for such facilities as rental apartments, shopping centers, strip malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile homes parks or any other multi - family projects with gravity wastewater collection systems that cannot or do not provide the required CUEs paralleling a typical single family street cross - section. The wastewater collection system shall lie within a CUE if it is to be owned and operated by the Board. Telemetry may be required for private lift stations. All other internal wastewater collection systems shall be owned, operated and maintained by a master property owner's association or comparable private ownership. 10.2 Conveyance Documents At the time of the County's final approval of construction documents, County shall provide Developer with County's checklist of the conveyance documents required for submission at the time the constructed facilities are dedicated to County. All conveyance documents, including but not limited to, Deeds, Bills of Sale, Affidavits, Easements, Facilities Agreements, Facilities Leases, Subordination by Lien Holders or Mortgages, Master Condominium /Homeowner's Association documents, Irrevocable Standby Letters of Credit, and UPSs, shall be in a form acceptable to the Collier County Attorney. A schedule of standard legal documents forms, 35 171 tis approved by the County Attorney, shall be utilized as a guide for the preparation of the conveyance documents. This schedule is located within Appendix A and B. Revisions to these forms must be reviewed and approved by the County Attorney. All documents shall be submitted to County for review and written approval and prior to acceptance of the utility facilities and commencement of service. Recording of all documents shall be made by the County only after written acceptance by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator or designee. All documents recorded hereafter, which do not follow this procedure, shall be returned as unacceptable. For projects which the water and /or wastewater facilities are not being conveyed to the Board, the final association documents shall contain a disclaimer stating: "The on -site water and /or wastewater facilities are to be owned and maintained by the Master Condominium /Homeowner's Association" (or other comparable private ownership). 10.3 Inspection County requires a preliminary and final inspection of all water and wastewater facilities constructed. The construction of all water and/or wastewater facilities must be observed and certified by the Engineer of Record and be inspected by the County. The nature and extent of the construction observation and inspection is detailed in Section 9.4. 10.4 Record Construction Drawings The record construction drawings shall accurately depict the constructed configuration of the water and wastewater facilities to be conveyed to the Board. All revisions to the approved construction drawings shall be precisely identified and illustrated on the record construction drawings. The following items shall be accurately depicted on the record construction drawings: a) Sewer system inverts, pipe slopes, manhole rim elevations and run lengths. A negative ( -) 10% sewer slope deviation from design slope is considered a substantial deviation and will not be accepted. See Section 17- 6.140(a)2, Florida Administrative Code, for details. b) Sewer lateral locations stationed from the nearest downstream manhole. 36 r 17I _� c) Sewer main stub extension inverts at both ends, pipe slope, run length and location. d) Tie -ins and /or stationing location to all valves, air release assemblies, fire hydrants, manholes, blowoffs, etc. e) Location and dimensional ties to lift station electrical services and transformer. All record construction drawings of utility facilities that are not being conveyed to the Board for a particular Water -Sewer District shall bear a prominently displayed DISCLAIMER, in bold lettering at least 1/4 inch high, stating: "The on -site water and /or wastewater facilities are to be owned and maintained by the project developer and /or the master condominium /homeowners' association," or other comparable private ownership. Five (5) sets of signed and sealed record construction drawings for the water and /or wastewater facilities to be conveyed shall be submitted to County. When water and wastewater facilities are being conveyed, seven (7) sets of signed and sealed record construction drawings shall be submitted to County. Each sheet of the record construction drawings shall identify the entity that provided the record data. Record drawings shall be provided magnetically in ACAD14 or later version. 10.5 Bacterial Analysis Pursuant to FDEP requirements and regulations, bacterial analyses are required for all potable water transmission and distribution facilities to be constructed. Bacteriological samples for new water facilities construction shall be performed during or after preliminary acceptance of the facilities. All such analysis shall be performed only by the Water Department laboratory and, at no cost to County, with test results submitted within 15 days of being placed in service for transmission lines and 30 days of being placed in service for distribution lines. The Public Utilities Division will not process meter installations and the Certificates of Occupancy until satisfactory bacterial tests are submitted and the Division receives the FDEP placement in service approval. The Developer shall be responsible for coordinating all aspects for the submission of all necessary test results and State approvals for placement in service of the water facilities. 10.6 Final Costs 37 17 i of The Developer or Engineer of Record shall submit a detailed schedule of the materials utilized for the utility facilities construction. This schedule shall include the type of items, quantities utilized, unit cost and total cost for each individual item utilized in the water and/or wastewater facilities construction. The total cost of all items utilized for the water and /or wastewater facilities shall be clearly shown on the schedule. Costs shall be tabled separately for County Owned and Privately Owned infrastructure. 10.7 Test Results All test data, i.e., pressure, inflow and infiltration, fire flow capacity, etc., required for submission with the conveyance documents shall be certified by an Engineer licensed to practice in the State of Florida. Certification shall bear the raised seal and an original signature of the engineer. Each certification shall contain computations illustrating the allowable limits for each test based on current accepted test standards and the actual field test data obtained. Leakage within water systems and sewage force main systems shall comply with AWWA Standards. Sewer system infiltration /exfiltration data shall conform to a standard of 50 gallons /inch of diameter /mile /day for all types of pipe and conform to procedures in the UTILITIES TECHNICAL MANUAL Fire flow capacity within the water distribution system must be verified through field- testing to demonstrate that required fire flow rates are available. Fire flow testing shall be accomplished during peak flow hours. 10.8 Lift Station Submittals A copy of the manufacturer's startup report for each facility shall be provided. Included with these items shall be a written verification from the electrical contractor for the lift station verifying the wire type and size for the electric service and certifying that the voltage drop across the service under full loan startup will not exceed 5% of the power company's line voltage at the transformer supplying the station. All tools, such as access cover lock handles, valve wrenches, keys or panel locks, required for the ready access and use of the facilities shall also be submitted with the documents. 10.9 Recordation Fees The Developer of a project will be responsible for the payment of all recordation fees associated with the utilities conveyance procedures. The Public Utilities Division or designee shall invoice DR I` 1 71 �1 1 r. -t1 and the Developer shall remit the total amount of the recording fee associated with recording the conveyance documents prior to the final acceptance of the water and /or wastewater facilities. SECTION ELEVEN THIS SECTION HAS NOW BEEN INCLUDED IN THE COLLIER UTILITIES TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL: SECTION TWELVE: THIS SECTION HAS NOW BEEN INCLUDED IN THE COLLIER UTILITIES TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL: SECTION THIRTEEN: AMENDMENTS County may recommend amendments to this Ordinance as may be necessary upon prior review by the Utility Code Sub - committee of the Development Services Advisory Committee, by the Public Utilities Administrator on technical matters and, in case of conflicts with the LDC, upon the additional prior review by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. Revisions shall be made annually to the "Collier Utilities Technical Standards Manual" by the Public Utility Administrator to reflect best engineering practices, technology advances, compliance with other agencies, and public input. These revisions shall also be reviewed by the parties listed above. SECTION FOURTEEN: PENALTY Section 6.1 of the Collier Code of Ordinances applies to this Ordinance, In addition, any person who violates any section or provision of this Ordinance shall be prosecuted and punished as provided by Section 125.69, Florida Statutes. Each day the violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. Additionally, the Board may bring suit for damages, to restrain, enjoin or otherwise prevent the violation of this Ordinance in the Circuit Court of Collier County. This Ordinance may also be enforced by Collier County Code Enforcement Boards. SECTION FIFTEEN: REPEAL OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17, 98 -53 and 2000 -59 are hereby repealed and superseded in their entirety. SECTION SIXTEEN: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES KU r 171- The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "Ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION SEVENTEEN: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY The provisions of this Ordinance shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purposes in the interest of public health, safety, welfare, and convenience. If any section, phrase, sentence or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION EIGHTEEN: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon being filed with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, As the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District, this day of 12001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, THE MARCO WATER ANI) SEWER DISTRICT AND THE GOODLAND WATER DISTRICT. ill James D. Carter, Ph.D. Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: gull David C. Weigel County Attorney APPENDIX A — STANDARD LEGAL DOCUMENTS INSTRUCTIONS 171 _ The following forms are to be used as a guide to preparers of instruments which shall be submitted to the Board for acceptance of water and /or wastewater utility facilities. Adherence to the form and instructions contained below will assure an expeditious review by the Collier County Attorney's Office, which in turn will speed the process of utility facilities acceptance by the Board. Deviation in substance or form from the suggested specimen forms may result in a substantial delay or disapproval of the utility facilities acceptance documents by the County Attorney's Office. PLEASE CAREFULLY READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PREPARING INSTRUMENTS INSTRUCTION NO. 1. Each specimen form is prepared in a manner that indicates to the preparer the location and the type of information that needs to be inserted. This is indicated by [brackets which contain instructions]. Most bracketed information is self - explanatory. However, where an in -depth instruction of the type of information to be inserted is appropriate, the bracketed information gives a brief explanation followed by a reference to an instruction. That instruction correlates to the following instructions. INSTRUCTION NO. 2. Name of grantor /mortgagee/ developer /lessee /owner /surety /issuer/ applicant (hereinafter collectively referred to for the purposes of this instruction as "grantor "). If grantor is an individual, insert the grantor's name followed by the grantor's marital status. If the grantor is married, the grantor's spouse must join in any conveyance instrument. As an alternative to having a grantor's spouse join in a conveyance instrument, a paragraph can be added below the reference to Exhibit "A" which says: "The subject lands are not homestead lands." 41 171 If the grantor is a corporate entity, show the correct name of the corporation and identify the state or other jurisdiction in which it is incorporated. If the grantor is a partnership entity, show correct name of the partnership, identify whether the partnership is a general or limited partnership, and identify the state or other jurisdiction under which the partnership was created and presently operates. If the grantor is a trust insert the trustees name, as trustee. If appropriate (Section 689.071, Florida Statutes), identify the trust and recite the authority of the trustee to convey. Your attention is directed to Chapter 689, Florida Statutes. INSTRUCTION NO. 3. Witness and signature block. All instruments, unless otherwise noted thereon, require 2 witnesses. Example witness and signature blocks are as follows: Execution by an individual: Witness - Signature Witness - Printed Name Witness - Signature John Smith Witness - Printed Name Execution by a corporation: Witness Development Corporation, Inc. a Florida corporation Witness 42 171 '"? By: President NOTE: In lieu of using two witnesses, a corporation may execute instruments by signing as noted below and affixing its corporate seals. Sections 692.01 and 692.02, Florida Statutes. A hand written or imprinted scrawl, scroll or seal, affixed as the corporate seal below the corporate officer's signature, is effectual as a seal. Section 695.07, Florida Statutes. Vice President Infrastructure Corp., Inc., an Indiana corporation (Corporate Seal of Infrastructure Corp., Inc.) Execution by a partnership with an individual acting as its general partner: Project Partners, a Florida Witness limited partnership By: General Partner Execution by a partnership with an entity acting as its general partner: Witness - Signature Building Joint Venture, a Kentucky general partnership by its entity general partner Witness - Printed Name 43 Witness - Signature Smith Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation on behalf of the partnership Witness - Printed Name Vice President Execution by a Section 689.070, Florida Statutes, Trustee: Witness - Signature Witness - Printed Name Witness - Signature Fred Fidelity, individually and as Trustee Witness - Printed Name Execution by a Section 689.071, Florida Statutes, Trustee: Witness - Signature .. i 171 1 171 Witness - Printed Name Witness - Signature Sally Springfield, Trustee of the above referenced Trust Witness - Printed Name INSTRUCTION NO. 4. ACKNO'%'LEDGMENT AND NOTARY BLOCK. The following forms of acknowledgment and notary block «nll be sufficient. For an execution by an individual: State of County of The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_, personally known or produced identification Type of identification produced: (Affix notary seal) Notary Public iti-iy Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name For execution by a corporation: State of 45 17f 4ft County of The foregoing [insert exact name of instrument] was acknowledged before me by [name of person], [corporate title must be either President, Vice President or Chief ExecutiNe Officer unless an appropriate corporate resolution is attached which specifically authorizes execution by some other corporate officer] or [exact name of corporation], a [insert the name of the State in which corporation is incorporated] corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Personally known or produced identification. Type of identification produced: WITNESS my hand and official sea] this _ day of , 20 Notary Public (Affix notary sea]) I%Iy Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name For an execution by a partnership a general partner who is an individual: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing [insert exact name of instrument] was ackmouvledged before me by [name of individual], general partner, on behalf of [exact name of partnership], a [insert name of state or jurisdiction under whose laws the partnership was formed and presently operates] [.identify type of partnership by inserting either general or limited] partnership. Personally known or Produced identification _. Type of identification produced WITNESS my hand and official seal this (Affix notary sea]) Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name day of , 20_ , me 171 "a For an execution by a partnership whose general partner is an entity: S'AT'E OF COUNTY OF The foregoing [insert exact: name of instrument] was acknowledged before me by [name of person], [corporate title, must be either President, Vice President or Chief Executive Officer unless an appropriate corporate resolution is attached which specifically authorizes execution by some other corporate officer] of [exact name of corporation], a [name of State in which corporation is incorporated] corporation, as entity general partner, on behalf of [exact name of partnership], a [insert name of state or jurisdiction under whose laws the partnership was formed and presently operates] [identify type of partnership by inserting either general or limited] partnership. Personally known or Produced identification _ Type of identification produced WITNESS my hand and official seal this (Affix notary seal) Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name day of , 20_ For an execution by a Section 689.070, Florida Statutes, Trustee: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing [insert exact name of instrument.] was acknowledged before me by [insert exact name of person], individually, and as Trustee. Personally known or Produced identification _. 'I'� -)e of identification produced WITNESS my hand and official seal this _ day of 120 47 171 (Affix notary seal) Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name For an execution by an individual as a Section 689.071, Florida Statutes, Trustee: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing [insert exact name of instrument] was acknowledged before me by [insert exact name of person], as Trustee on behalf of the above - referenced Trust. Personally known or Produced identification _. Type of identification produced WITNESS my hand and official seal this day ofd 1.20— (Affix notary seal) Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name For an execution by a corporation as a Section 689.071, Florida Statutes, 'Trustee: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing [insert exact name of instrument] was acknowledged before me by [name of person], [corporate title must be either President, Vice President or Chief Executive Officer unless an appropriate corporate resolution is attached which specifically authorizes execution by some other corporate officer] of [exact name of corporation], a [insert the name of the State in which i • 171 corporation is incorporated] corporation, on behalf of the corporation as Trustee of the above referenced Trust. Personally known or Produced identification _. Type of identification produced WITNESS my hand and official seal this (Affix notary seal) Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name day of , 20_ INSTRUCTION NO. 5. Exhibits attached to all instruments must describe the real property that encompasses the subject utility facilities or easement. Language on the legal description Exhibit that alters or qualifies the instrument to which it is attached is unacceptable. INSTRUCTION NO. 6. For the purposes of simplicity and brevity, references in this Appendix and Collier County Ordinance No. 97- , as amended, to the Collier County Water -Sewer District shall also be construed to refer to the Marco Water and Sewer District or the Goodland Water District, where appropriate and as the context requires. Preparers of legal documents are cautioned to determine to which District their documents should run before preparing and submitting documents. INSTRUCTION NO. 7. Notarization of an oath. The proper notarization of an oath (or affirmation) is as follows: "SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of 20_." An acknowledgment is not acceptable for any affidavit (Subsection 117.05 (13), Florida Statutes. The affiant must both swear to the document in the presence of the NotaU and sign the document in the presence of the Notary. E 171 INSTRUCTION NO. 8. This Appendix is provided as a guide to preparers and is riot intended to be all- inclusive. All documents will be reviewed on an individual basis. If the prepares is unsure of the required form or content of any document, he or she should seek professional advice or assistance prior to preparing and submitting the document for acceptance. Form 1 - Rev. 07/00 (Facilities Agreement) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 *[Identify type of treatment facility by inserting either water or sewer in title of this instrument] * FACILITIES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this [day] day of [month], [year], by and between [Name of developer - see Instruction No. 2] (hereinafter referred to as "Developer "), and THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER- SEWER DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as "County "). Developer is used as singular or plural, as the context requires. RECITALS: WHEREAS, for the purposes of this Agreement the term "Developer" shall include the Developer, the Developer's heirs, successors, and assigns, including but not limited to any wholly owned or controlled subsidiary entity who leases back any utility facilities from the County; and RULE 171 WHEREAS, the Developer is the Owner of the [insert name of project shown below referenced construction plans] development, (hereinafter "Project ") and has submitted construction plans for an interim [identify type of treatment facility by inserting water or sewer] treatment facility (hereinafter "interim treatment facility") to the County for review and approval; and WHEREAS, the Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Developer is required to provide on -site interim utility facilities which service the Project until the utility facilities within the Project can be connected to the off -site utility facilities operated by the County and the County facilities have the available capacity to service the Project; and WHEREAS, Collier County land development regulations require, and Developer covenants and agrees, that the Developer shall connect any interim, utility system serving that Project to the off - site utility system operated by the County when the County's system has been extended to within two hundred (200) feet of the Project and the available off -site utility system has available capacity to service the entire Project; and WHEREAS, the extension of the off -site utility system operated by the County to within two hundred (200) feet of the boundary of the Project shall be not required of the County as performance under this Agreement; and WHEREAS, all parties to this Agreement acknowledge and agree that the decision as to whether or not any off -site utility system operated by the County has the capacity to service the Project shall be made solely by the County; and WHEREAS, the Developer acknowledges its obligation to dedicate all appropriate collection, distribution and transmission facilities and appropriate easements to the County prior to placing said facilities into service; and WHEREAS, the Developer, or other successor entity satisfactory to the County, will maintain and operate the interim treatment facility and the associated on -site collection, distribution and transmission plant pursuant to a lease agreement with the County as set forth herein below; and WHEREAS, the developer has previously accepted the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement as part of the County's review and approval of the Developer's land use petitions. WITNESSETH: 51 171 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained the parties agree as follows: I. RECITALS INCORPORATED. The above Recitals are true and correct and shall be incorporated herein. 2. INTERIM FACILITY. The appropriate on -site treatment, collection, distribution and transmission facilities are to be constructed as part of the proposed Project and shall be an interim facility; all utility facilities shall be constructed to State and Federal standards and are to be owned. operated and maintained by the Developer or other successor entity satisfactory to the County until such time as the County's off -site utility facilities are available to service the project. The interim treatment facilities shall supply services only to the Project or, subject to the County's approval, other lands owned by the Developer. The interim treatment facilities may not provide service outside the Project without the written consent of the County. 3. DEVELOPER TO DISMANTLE INTERIM TREATMENT FACILITY. Upon connection to the County's off -site utility facilities the Developer shall abandon, dismantle and remove from the site the interim treatment facility. All work related with this activity shall be performed at no cost to the County whatsoever in accordance with FDEP standards. 4. CONNECTION TO COUNTY'S OFF -SITE SYSTEM AT NO COST TO COUNTY. The Developer at no cost to the COUNTY will make connection to the County's off -site utility facilities to the County within ninety (90) days after such facilities become available. The cost of connection shall include, whenever the County requires, but not be limited to, all engineering design and preparation of construction documents, permitting, modification or refitting of existing pumping facilities, construction of new pumping facilities, interconnection with County off -site utility facilities, any transmission, distribution or collection lines necessary to make the connection and any required environmental audits, including the expense of bringing the subject facilities into compliance and response costs for clean -up removal or remediation. 5. CONVEYANCE OF INTERIM TREATMENT FACILITIES NEEDED FOR CONNECTION AND OPERATION OF COUNTY'S OFF -SITE SYSTEM. At the time the County's off -site facilities are available for the Project to connect, all utility facilities required by the County to make the connection with the County's off -site utility facilities shall be conveyed to the County pursuant to County ordinances and regulations then in effect, together with all utility easements 52 .r 171 P� required by the County. All construction plans and technical specifications related to the connection of the County's off -site utility facilities shall be submitted to the County for review and approval prior to commencement of construction. COUNTY at its option may require conveyance of facilities internal to the project. 6. CUSTOMER TURNOVER. All customers served on an interim basis by the utility system constructed by the Developer shall become customers of the County at the time when the County's off -site sewer facilities are available to serve the Project and such connection is made. Prior to connection of the interim utility system serving the Project to the County's off -site utility facilities, the Developer shall turn over to the County a complete list of customers served by the interim utility system and shall not compete in any way with the County for the service of those customers. The Developer shall also provide the County with a detailed inventory of the facilities served within the Project and cooperate fully in the transfer of any billing procedures. 7. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES TO BE PAID PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. The Developer agrees to pay all applicable system development charges at the time that Building Permits are required, pursuant to County Ordinances and Regulations then in effect. This requirement shall be made known to all prospective buyers of properties for which building permits will be required. 8. LEASEBACK OF DEDICATED FACILITIES. The County and the Developer shall enter into a leaseback of the collection, distribution and transmission facilities to the Developer, or other utility entity satisfactory to the County, to allow for continued operation of the interim utility system. Such a leaseback shall be upon terms comparable to utility facilities lease agreements then entered into by the County as required by and in accordance with applicable County land development regulations and /or utility standards and procedures. Any such lease agreement shall be in a form approved by the Office of the Collier County Attorney. 9. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. [Developer's witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] 53 • 171 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS , Clerk OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE Deputy Clerk GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT Chairman Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney [Developer's acknowledgment and notary block - see Instruction No. 4] STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared , well known to me to be the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, As The Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of The Collier County Water -Sewer District, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing [insert exact name of instrument] for the purposes therein contained under authority duly invested by the Board of County Commissioners, and that the seal affixed thereto is the true seal of said Board. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of ,20 (Notarial Seal) 54 Notary Public My Commission Expires: TCP /forms/ 10112 ri 17! Form 2 - Rev. 07/00 (Performance Bond) Utilities Acceptance Documents -Doc. 320 UTILITIES PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: that [Insert name of Owner - See Instruction No. 2] [Insert current business address of Owner] (hereinafter referred to as "Owner ", and [Insert name of Surety - See Instruction No. 2] [Insert current business address of Surety] (hereinafter referred to as "Surety "), are held and firmly bound unto Collier County, Florida, (hereinafter called "County "), in the total aggregate penal sum of [insert written dollar amount] Dollars $[insert numeric dollar amount] in lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Owner and Surety are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Owner entered into a certain Utilities Facilities Construction Contract, dated the [day] day of [month], 20[year], a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS the County has a material interest in the performance of said Contract; and 55 1 � +ipa WHEREAS the County has adopted Ordinances and Resolutions (hereinafter "Land Development Regulations ") concerning the Owner's obligations to the County regarding the construction, conveyance and warranty of water and sewer facilities constructed within the unincorporated area of Collier County; NOW, THEREFORE, if the Owner shall well, truly and faithfully perform its obligations and duties to the County under said Land Development Regulations and all the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions, and agreements of said contract during the original term thereof, and any extensions thereof which may be granted by the Owner, with or without notice to the Surety and during the guaranty period established by the County, and thereafter, and if the Owner shall satisfy all claims and demands incurred under such contract, and shall fully indemnify and save harmless the County from all costs and damages which it may suffer by reason of failure to do so, and shall reimburse and repay the County all outlay and expense which the County may incur in making good any default, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that the said Surety, for value received hereby, stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to work to be performed there under or the specifications accompanying same shall in any way affect its obligation on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work or to the specifications. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that it is expressly agreed that the bond shall be deemed amended automatically and immediately, without formal and separate amendments hereto, upon amendment to the Contract not increasing the contract price more than 20 percent, so as to bind the Owner and the Surety to the full and faithful performance of the contract as so amended. The term "Amendment ", wherever used in this bond, and whether referring to this bond, the Contract or other documents shall include any alteration, addition or modification of any character whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Instrument to be executed this day of 120 [Owner's witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] 56 �t [Surety's witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Notary and acknowledgment blocks for both Owner and Surety required - See Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] TCP /forms /10113 Form 3 - Rev. 07/00 - (Letter of Credit) Utilities Acceptance Documents - Doc. #320 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. [Insert issuer's identifying number] ISSUER: [insert full name and street address of Issuer] (hereinafter "Issuer ") PLACE AND DATE OF ISSUE: [insert address where credit is issued and date of issue]. PLACE OF EXPIRY: At Issuer's counters located at . [ONLY In Collier County] DATE OF EXPIRY: This Credit shall be valid until [insert date of first anniversary of date of issue], and shall thereafter be automatically renewed for successive one -year periods on the anniversary of its issue unless at least sixty (60) days prior to any such anniversary date, the Issuer notifies the Beneficiary in writing by registered mail that the Issuer elects not to so renew this Credit. 57 e. 171 z APPLICANT: [insert full name of person or entity - see Instruction No. 21 (hereinafter "Applicant ") [insert Applicant's current business address]. BENEFICIARY: The Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida (hereinafter "Beneficiary") Collier County Courthouse Complex, Naples, Florida, 34112. AMOUNT: $[insert dollar amount] (U.S.) up to an aggregate thereof. CREDIT AVAILABLE WITH: Issuer. BY: Payment against documents detailed herein and Beneficiary's drafts at sight drawn on the Issuer. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED: AVAILABLE BY BENEFICIARY'S DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON THE ISSUER AND ACCOMPANIED BY BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY THE COUNTY MANAGER, CERTIFYING THAT: "[insert name of Applicant] has failed to construct and /or maintain the [identify type of improvements by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] improvements as shown on the plans for [insert exact name or title of project shown on construction plans], or a final inspection satisfactory to Collier County, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17, as amended, has not been performed prior to the date of expiry, and satisfactory alternative performance security has not been provided to and formally accepted by the Beneficiary ". DRAFT(S) DRAWN UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MUST BE MARKED: "Drawn under [insert name of Issuer] Credit No. [insert Issuer's number identifying this letter of credit], dated [insert original date of issue] ". The original letter of credit and all amendments, if any, must be presented for proper endorsement. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full the terms of the Issuer's undertaking and such undertaking shall not in any way be modified, amended, or amplified by reference to any documents, instrument, or agreement referenced to herein or in which this letter of credit relates, and any such reference shall not be deemed to incorporate herein by reference any document, instrument or agreement. Issuer hereby engages with Beneficiary that draft(s) drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this credit will be duly honored by Issuer if presented within the validity of this credit. This credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits [1993 (or later generally applicable) Revision] International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 500 [or later Publication No.]. [Name of Issuer] {Insert title of corporate officer - must be signed • 171 President, Vice President, or Chief Executive Officer] TCP/forms/ 10 114 NOTE: Collier County shall not accept Letters of Credit that cannot be presented in Florida. Form 4 - Rev. 07/00 (Utilities Facilities Subordination Consent and Joinder) Utilities Acceptance — Doc #320 Leave 3" blank space in upper right hand corner for recording purposes UTILITY FACILITIES SUBORDINATION, CONSENT AND JOINDER THIS SUBORDINATION, CONSENT AND JOINDER given this [day] day of [month], [year], by [Name of Secured Party - see Instruction No. 2] (Hereinafter referred to as "Secured Party"), in favor of the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, its successors and assigns, (hereinafter referred to as "County "). Secured Party is used as singular or plural, as the context requires. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Secured Party is the owner and holder of that certain [insert the exact name of each instrument to be subordinated] recorded in Official Records Book , Page 59 i 171 [insert the Official Records Book and first page reference for each instrument to be subordinated] et seq of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as "Securing Instruments) "), encumbering the premises legally described therein, (hereinafter referred to as the "Encumbered Property "). WHEREAS, County has requested and received from the fee simple owner of the Encumbered Property non- exclusive easements for the installation, relocation and /or maintenance of utility facilities over, under and /or across a portion of the encumbered premises legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by virtue of this reference, which premises are hereinafter referred to as the "Easement Property". WHEREAS, County has requested that Secured Party consent to, join in and subordinate its Securing Instruments) to the interest that County has in the Easement Property to which request Mortgagee has agreed. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Secured Party does hereby consent to, join in and subordinate the lien of its securi to the grant of that certain easement described herein over, under, and across the Easement Property and any interest of the County in any utility facilities located therein, thereon, or affixed thereto. Except as subordinated to the easement described herein over, under, and across the Easement Property or any utility facilities located therein or affixed thereto, said security interest shall remain otherwise in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Secured Party has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Acknowledgment and notary block - see Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] •1 [Address of person preparing this instrument] TCP /forms/ 10123 Form 5 - Rev. 07 /00 - (Attorney's Affidavit) Utilities Acceptance - Doc #320 ATTORNEY'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF [name of State] COUNTY OF [name of County] 171 'All BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, per-senally on this day of , 19 , personally appeared , who to me is well known, and having been sworn and under oath, deposes and states: 1. My name is , I am over the age of twenty -one (21) years, am otherwise sui juris, and have personal knowledge of the facts asserted herein. 2. I am a licensed attorney, Florida Bar # , authorized to practice law in Florida and am practicing law in the State of Florida. My business address is My business telephone number is My business mailing address is 3. This Affidavit is given as an inducement to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the governing body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District to accept the dedication or conveyance of [identify type of utility facility by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities located 61 171 within or upon the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A ", which is incorporated herein by reference, said land being located in Collier County, Florida. 4.The Affiant has examined record title information to both the real and personal property referenced in this affidavit, including but not limited to, information requested from the Florida Secretary of State relative to any Uniform Commercial Code financing statements. S.The record owner of the real property described herein is [give full legal name of owner as it appears in title information; if owner is an entity make reference to the laws of the state or jurisdiction under which entity was created and presently operates] (hereinafter "Owner "). The Owner acquired record title to the subject real property by instrument recorded at Official Records Book , at Page [insert official record book and first page of instrument where owner acquired title], Public Records, Collier County, Florida (copy attached) [If the record owner is an entity, the Affiant must indicate that he has examined corporate or partnership information obtained from the jurisdiction under which the entity was created and presently operates, that the entity is current and active within said State or jurisdiction, that the entity is currently authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and identify the exact name and title of the persons authorized to execute the instruments on behalf of the entity in conjunction with the conveyance of the subject real and personal property.] [Pursuant to Section 689.071, Florida Statutes if the record owner is a trustee, the Affiant shall state that the Trustee has full power and authority to execute instruments of conveyance on behalf of the Trust and, if applicable, incorporate by reference and attach supporting documentation.] [If the record owner is an individual, the Affiant must state the marital status represented to the Affiant by the individual and, if married, state whether or not the individual has represented the subject real property is homestead property.] 6. [The Affiant shall state whether the subject real and personal property is encumbered of record, or is the subject of any financing statements filed in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida 62 171 or the Office of the Secretary of State. If the subject real or personal property is encumbered the Affiant shall specifically describe each lien, encumbrance or financing statement, citing appropriate recording information and the Affiant shall attach and incorporate by reference a copy of each lien, encumbrance, or financing statement.] 7. Affiant further states that the information contained in this Affidavit is true, correct and current as of the date this Affidavit is given. [INFORMATIONAL NOTE: Per Ordinance the date of this Affidavit must not be signed and dated more than sixty (60) days prior to the meeting at which the Board of County Commissioners considers the acceptance of the subject utility facility documents.] FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. DATED this day of , 20 Affiant Signature Affiant Printed Name [No witnesses required] [Notary block] - SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of 20_1 by (Insert name of person taking the oath), who is personally known OR produced identification Type of Identification Produced 63 171 Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] TCP /forms/ 10122 Form 6 - Rev. 07/00 (Owners Affidavit) Utilities Acceptance - Doc #320 OWNER'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF [name of State] COUNTY OF [name of County] BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared who to me is well known, and having been duly sworn and under oath, deposes and states: 1. My name is , I am over the age of twenty -one (21) years, am sui juris, and have personal knowledge of the facts asserted herein. 2. I am the owner of said real property located at described on Exhibit "A ". and legally 3. All persons, firms, and corporations, including the general contractor, and all subcontractors and sub - subcontractors and suppliers who have furnished services, labor or materials according to H e► 17! a' plans and specifications, or extra items; used in the construction or repair of [identify type of utility facility by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities on the real estate hereinafter described, have been paid in full and that such work has been fully completed and unconditionally accepted by the owner. 4. No claims have been made to the Owner, nor is any suit now pending on behalf of any contractor, subcontractor, sub - subcontractor, supplier, laborer or materialman, and no chattel mortgages or conditional bills of sale have been given or are now outstanding as to the subject utility facilities placed upon or installed in or on the aforesaid premises. 5. The utility facilities described herein are not included in, encumbered by, or subject to any real property mortgage, chattel mortgage, security agreement, Uniform Commercial Code financing statement, or any other encumbrance that might affect marketable title to the subject utility facilities and /or easement(s). 6. As and on behalf of the owner of the subject utility facilities, does for valuable consideration hereby agree and guarantee, to hold the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the governing body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District harmless against any lien, claim or suit by any general contractor, subcontractor, sub - subcontractor, supplier, mechanic or materialman, and against chattel mortgages, security interests or repair of the subject utility facilities by or on behalf of Owner. Affiant is used as singular or plural, as the context requires. The utility facilities referred to herein are located within the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A ". 65 • 171 FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. DATED this day of , +9 Affiant Signature Printed Name [No witnesses required] [Notary block] - SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 20_, by (Insert name of person taking the oath), Personally known OR produced identification Type of Identification Produced Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] MS A 171 [Address of person preparing this instrument] TCP /forms /10121 Form 7 - Rev. 07/00 (Utility Easement) Utilities Acceptance — Doc #320 Leave 3" blank space in upper right hand corner for recording purposes UTILITY EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, granted this [day] day of [month], 43[year], by [Name of Grantor - see Instruction No. 21 as Grantor, to the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, its successors and assigns, as Grantee. WITNESSETH: That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, non - exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install, relocate and /or maintain utility facilities, in, on, over and under the following described lands being located in Collier County, Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. CY1 V 171 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee and its assigns, together with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, relocate and /or take materials for the purpose of constructing, operating, relocating and /or maintaining the subject utility facilities thereon. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Witnesses and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Acknowledgment and notary block - see Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] TCP /forms/ 10120 Form 8 - Rev. 01 /00 (Warranty Deed and Bill of Sale) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. 4320 Leave 3" blank space in upper right hand corner for recording purposes UTILITY FACILITIES WARRANTY DEED AND BILL OF SALE THIS INDENTURE made this [day] day of [month], 20[year], between [Name of Grantor - see Instruction No. 21 (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor "), and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY [. a 171 AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER- SEWER DISTRICT, its successors and assigns, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee ") WITNESSETH: That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever, all [identify type of utility facilities by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities lying within the following described land, together with appurtenant easement rights for the operation, relocation, installation and maintenance of said facilities, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to wit: (See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.) and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said utility facilities; be they realty, personalty, or mixed, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. For the purposes of this conveyance, the utility facilities conveyed herein shall not be deemed to convey any of the lands described in Exhibit "A ". Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as context requires. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee and its assigns, together with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, relocate and /or take materials for the purpose of constructing, relocating, operating, and maintaining utility facilities thereon. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Acknowledgment and notary block - see Instruction No. 41 Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] •• s 171 '? TCP /ks /forms /10119 [NOTE: The 'BILL OF SALE" has been dispensed with, it is not needed with the revised combination Deed and Bill of Sale.] Form 10 - Rev. 01 /00 - (Facilities Lease) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 Leave 3" blank space in upper right hand corner for recording purposes * [Identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer in the title of this instrument] * FACILITIES LEASE THIS LEASE, executed this [day] day of [month], by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessor ") and [Name of Lessee - see Instruction No. 21 (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessee "). RECITALS: WHEREAS, [identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer] utility facilities lying in the lands described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference were conveyed to Lessor by Lessee, and the Lessor is now the owner of said facilities; and WHEREAS, the Lessee is the owner of a [identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer] treatment plant and has agreed to provide service to the [insert name of project] development (hereinafter "Project ") until such time as the Lessor desires to provide treatment by means of the Lessors treatment facilities; and 70 171 WHEREAS, the Lessee needs to have possession and use of the facilities described in Exhibit "A" for so long as it is obligated to provide interim treatment service to the Project. WITNESSETH: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration exchanged among each of the parties, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS INCORPORATED. The above recitals are true and correct and shall be incorporated herein. 2. LEASED PROPERTY. The Lessor shall lease to the Lessee all of the utility facilities described herein and located on the lands described in Exhibit "A ". 3. TERM. The term of the lease shall be ten (10) years. At the end of ten (10) years, the lease shall be automatically renewed for successive five (5) year terms, unless terminated by either party as herein provided. 4. RENT. The Lessee shall pay the Lessor the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per year as rent under this Agreement. Rent shall be paid upon submission of a statement by the Lessor to the Lessee, and shall be paid yearly at the offices of the Utility Department of the Lessor. 5. TERMINATION. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Agreement, the parties agree that this lease shall terminate at such time as the Lessor undertakes to provide the treatment service for the Project. 6. OPERATION OF TREATMENT FACILITY. During the period of this lease, the Lessee agrees that it or a wholly owned subsidiary shall provide treatment services to the Project, provided all initial connection fees and user rates are paid. The Lessee further agrees that so long as it provides such services, it will charge utility rates approved and regulated by the State of Florida Public Service Commission. 7. STANDARD OF MAINTENANCE. Lessee shall maintain all utility facilities, including but not limited to, all transmission, collection, distribution and treatment facilities, at standards equal to the maintenance standards for comparable utility facilities maintained by the Lessor. 71 171 8. FACILITIES TO BE IN GOOD WORKING ORDER UPON CONNECTION TO OFF -SITE SYSTEM. Lessee shall be solely responsible to have all utility facilities subject to this Agreement in good working order and in compliance with all County, State, and Federal requirements when the facilities are conveyed to the Lessor and are connected to the Lessors off -site utility facilities. At no cost to the Lessor, Lessee shall conduct and provide to the Lessor an environmental audit, together with a written declaration from an environmental consultant acceptable to the Lessor, which verifies that the facilities subject to this Agreement are in compliance with all applicable State and Federal environmental laws, and that the facilities and property surrounding the facilities are free of unlawful contamination. The environmental consultant shall demonstrate its qualifications to the satisfaction of the Lessor prior to commencing the environmental audit. Its qualification shall be presumptively established if the project manager is a professional engineer who is registered and in good standing with the State of Florida, or a certified environmental professional by the National Association of Environmental Professionals or some other like national professional organization. The Lessors acceptance of the environmental consultant shall not be unreasonably withheld. At least ninety (90) days prior to the connection of the interim utility system to the Lessor's off -site utility system, the Lessor shall notify the Lessee to commence the environmental audit. The failure of the Lessor to give timely notice to the Lessee or acceptance by the Lessor of any interim utility system in the absence of receipt of the negative declaration, shall not relieve the Lessee of any obligation hereunder for the cost of conducting the environmental audit, bringing the subject facilities into compliance and the response costs for clean -up, removal and remediation, if any, which shall be borne solely by the Lessee. 9. INSURANCE. Until such time as the interim utility system serving the Project is connected to the off -site utility facilities operated by the Lessor, Lessee shall provide and pay for all property damage and liability insurance for the entire utility system servicing the Project, including, but not limited to, flood damage insurance for any lift, eductor or pump station facilities. Lessee shall provide the Lessor upon each renewal of the required insurance policies or inclusion of additional facilities under this Agreement, with a Certificate of Insurance evidencing coverage for the full replacement value of the entire utility system which services the Project, and showing the Lessor as an additional insured for any interim utility facilities ultimately necessary for connection to and operation of the Lessors off -site utility system. 10. GUARANTEE BY LESSEE. The Lessee shall have the sole responsibility for repairing and /or replacement of defective materials and guaranteeing all facilities covered by this Agreement for a period of approximately one year from date of preliminary acceptance by 72 r 171 e Lessor. Further, at the end of the guarantee period it shall be the sole responsibility of Lessee to prepare all facilities for final inspection by the Lessor at no expense to the Lessor. 11. BINDING EFFECT. This Lease shall be binding upon all of the parties to this Lease, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Lessee's witness and signature block - See Instruction No. 31 ATTEST: LESSOR: Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney [Lessees acknowledgment and notary block - See Instruction "No. 4] 73 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared , well known to me to be the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, As The Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of The Collier County Water -Sewer District, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing [insert exact name of instrument] for the purposes therein contained under authority duly invested by the Board of County Commissioners, and that the seal affixed thereto is the true seal of sail Board. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of ,2001._ Notary Public (Notarial Seal) My Commission Expires: Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] 74 TCP /forms / 10117 Form 11 - Rev. 01/00 - 17j -, (Facilities Lease including Sub - Developer) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 Leave 3" blank space for in upper right hand corner for recording purposes * [Identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by o inserting water or sewer in the title of this instrument] * FACILITIES LEASE THIS LEASE, executed this [day] day of [month], 4- 4[year], by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS 'THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessor ") and [Name of Lessee - see Instruction No. 2] (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessee "), and [Name of Developer - see Instruction No. 2] (hereinafter referred to as "Developer "). RECITALS: WHEREAS, [identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer] utility facilities lying in the lands described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference were constructed and installed by Developer, and thereafter conveyed to Lessor by Developer, and the Lessor is now the owner of said facilities; and WHEREAS, the Lessee is the owner of a [identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer] treatment plant and has agreed to provide service to the [insert name of 75 171 ' project] development (hereinafter "Project ") until such time as the Lessor desires to provide treatment by means of the Lessors treatment facilities; and WHEREAS, the Lessee needs to have possession and use of the facilities described in Exhibit "A" for so long as it is obligated to provide interim treatment service to the Project. WITNESSETH: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration exchanged among each of the parties, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS INCORPORATED. The above recitals are true and correct and shall be incorporated herein. 2. LEASED PROPERTY. The Lessor shall lease to the Lessee all of the utility facilities described herein and located on the lands described in Exhibit "A ". 3. TERM. The term of the lease shall be ten (10) years. At the end of ten (10) years, the lease shall be automatically renewed for successive five (5) year terms, unless terminated by either party as herein provided. 4. RENT. The Lessee shall pay the Lessor the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per year as rent under this Agreement. Rent shall be paid upon submission of a statement by the Lessor to the Lessee, and shall be paid yearly at the offices of the Utility Department of the Lessor. 5. TERMINATION. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Agreement, the parties agree that this lease shall terminate at such time as the Lessor undertakes to provide the treatment service for the Project. 6. OPERATION OF TREATMENT FACILITY. During the period of this lease, the Lessee agrees that it or a wholly owned subsidiary shall provide treatment services to the Project, provided all initial connection fees and user rates are paid. The Lessee further agrees that so long as it provides such services, it will charge utility rates approved and regulated by the State of Florida Public Service Commission. 76 1 17I "' 7. STANDARD OF MAINTENANCE. Lessee shall maintain all utility facilities, including but not limited to, all transmission, collection, distribution and treatment facilities, at standards equal to the maintenance standards for comparable utility facilities maintained by the Lessor. 8. FACILITIES TO BE IN GOOD WORKING ORDER UPON CONNECTION TO OFF -SITE SYSTEM. Lessee shall be solely responsible to have all utility facilities subject to this Agreement in good working order and in compliance with all County, State, and Federal requirements when the facilities are conveyed to the Lessor and are connected to the Lessors off -site utility facilities. At no cost to the Lessor, Lessee shall conduct and provide to the Lessor an environmental audit, together with a written declaration from an environmental consultant acceptable to the Lessor, which verifies that the facilities subject to this Agreement are in compliance with all applicable State and Federal environmental laws, and that the facilities and property surrounding the facilities are free of unlawful contamination. The environmental consultant shall demonstrate its qualification to the satisfaction of the Lessor prior to commencing the environmental audit. Its qualification shall be presumptively established if the project manager is a professional engineer who is registered and in good standing with the State of Florida, or a certified environmental professional by the National Association of Environmental Professionals or some other like national professional organization. The Lessor's acceptance of the environmental consultant shall not be unreasonably withheld. At least ninety (90) days prior to the connection of the interim utility system to the Lessor's off -site utility system, the Lessor shall notify the Lessee to commence the environmental audit. The failure of the Lessor to give timely notice to the Lessee or acceptance by the Lessor of any interim utility system in the absence of receipt of the negative declaration, shall not relieve the Lessee of any obligation hereunder for the cost of conducting the environmental audit, bringing the subject facilities into compliance and the response costs for clean -up, removal and remediation, if any, which shall be borne solely by the Lessee. 9. INSURANCE. Until such time as the interim utility system serving the Project is connected to the off -site utility facilities operated by the Lessor, Lessee shall provide and pay for all property damage and liability insurance for the entire utility system servicing the Project, including, but not limited to, flood damage insurance for any lift, eductor or pump station facilities. However, as between the Lessee and the Developer, it is agreed that the Developer shall reimburse the Lessee, upon demand, for any expenses associated with insuring the utility facilities subject to this lease. Lessee shall provide the Lessor upon each renewal of the required insurance policies or inclusion of additional facilities under this Agreement, with a Certificate of Insurance evidencing coverage for the full replacement value of the entire utility system which services the Project, and showing 77 171 the Lessor as an additional insured for any interim utility facilities ultimately necessary for connection to and operation of the Lessors off -site utility system. 10. GUARANTEE BY DEVELOPER. The Developer shall have the responsibility for repairing and /or replacement of defective materials and guaranteeing all facilities covered by this Agreement for a period approximately of one year from date of preliminary acceptance by Lessor. Further, at the end of the guarantee period it shall be the responsibility of Developer to prepare all facilities for final inspection by the Lessor at no expense to the Lessor. 11. BINDING EFFECT. This Lease shall be binding upon all of the parties to this Lease, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Lessees witness and signature block - See Instruction No. 3] [Developers witness and signature block - See Instruction No. 3] ATTEST: LESSOR: Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT C Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: VS] 171 Assistant County Attorney [Lessees acknowledgment and notary block - See Instruction No. 4] [Developers acknowledgment and notary block - See Instruction No. 4] STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared , well known to me to be the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, As The Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of The Collier County Water -Sewer District, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing [insert exact name of instrument] for the purposes therein contained under authority duly invested by the Board of County Commissioners, and that the seal affixed thereto is the true seal of sail Board. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of 120 (Notarial Seal) My Commission Expires: Notary Public 79 Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] TCP /forms/ 10116 Form 12 - Rev. 01 /00 (Final Attorney's Affidavit) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 FINAL ATTORNEY'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF W41I r+IVLS" 171 BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally on this day of , 20 , appeared , who to me is well known, and having been sworn and under oath, deposes and states: 1. My name is . I am over the age of twenty -one (2 1 ) years, am otherwise sui juris, and have personal knowledge of the facts contained herein. 2. I am a licensed attorney, Florida Bar # authorized to practice law in Florida and am practicing law in the State of Florida. My business address is . My business telephone number is . My business mailing address is all 6 " 17I ' 3. This Affidavit is given as an inducement to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, to conduct a final inspection of [identify type of utility facility by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities located within or upon the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A ", which is incorporated herein by reference, said land being located in Collier County, Florida. 4. The Affiant has examined record title information to both the real and personal property referenced in this affidavit, including but not limited to, information requested from the Florida Secretary of State relative to any Uniform Commercial Code financing statements. 5. The record owner of the utility facilities described herein is the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (hereinafter "County"). The County acquired its record interest by [insert exact name of each instrument] recorded at Official Records Book , at page [insert official record book and first page of each instrument where owner acquired title] [if a utility easement was also acquired continue sentence and add: together with an appurtenant utility easement recorded at Official Records Book , page ] Public Records, Collier County, Florida (copies attached). 6. Subsequent to the time that the County recorded its interests in the subject utility facilities and, if applicable, easement, as specified in paragraph 3, above, no interest of the County in the subject utility facilities and, if applicable, easement, is encumbered of record by any document filed by or on behalf of the landowner (or predecessor in title to the underlying real estate in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and /or the Office of the Secretary of State. 7. Affiant further states that the information contained in this Affidavit is true, correct and current as of the date of the recordation of the recorded documents referenced herein which conveyed or granted the subject utility facilities and/or easement interests to the County. [INFORMATIONAL NOTE: Per Ordinance the date of this Affidavit must not be signed and dated more than sixty (60) days prior to the meeting at which the Board of County Commissioners considers the acceptance of the subiect utility facility documents. FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. r DATED this day of 120 Affiant Signature Affiant Printed Name [No witnesses required] [Notary block] - SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of ,2001_, by (insert name of person taking the oath), who is personally known OR produced identification Type of identification produced Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] "� 171 APPENDIX B — CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT CHECKLIST CHECKLIST #1 WATER AND /OR WASTEWATER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE PROJECT Date Legal Documents 1. Utilities Performance Security (UPS) 2. Copy of Recorded Condominium /Homeowner's Association Documents 3. Utilities Facilities Subordination Consent and Joinder (Required for each mortgage and other Security Interest that affects title to the facilities being conveyed is involved). UCC -1's can be subordinated by a Subordination other than UCC -3 4. UCC -1 and /or UCC -3 Forms (if not covered by Item 3) above 5. Attorney's Affidavit 6. Owner's Affidavit 7. Utility Easement and Copy of the Grantor's Deed for the Associated Real Property 8. Warranty Deed and Bill of Sale 9. I.D. Number or Folio Number of Property 10. Facilities Lease when applicable 11. Facilities Lease (including Sub - Developer) use form 10.1 12. Final Release of Lien from Utility Contractor for the Facility(ies) constructed. 13. Legal Description, if Utility Easements required, with Surveyor's Sketch of Easement. Submit four (4) signed and sealed copies of each easement. Easements not required if all facilities are installed in existing CUE'S. 14. Two (2) Copies of Recorded Plat 15. Engineer's Final Payment Confirmation. CHECKLIST #2 RE 1 171 WATER AND /OR WASTEWATER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE Tests Certifications and Supplemental Documents 1. Certification of pressure testing of water mains by Engineer of Record. 2. Certification of pressure testing of sewer force mains by Engineer of Record. 3. Certification of the inflow /infiltration tests for the sewer lines by Engineer of Record. 4. Bacteriological clearance (DER Certification) for water facilities and DER placement in service letter for sewer facilities and interim water and /or sewage treatment facilities, where necessary. 5. Lab results on bacteriological test for water mains. 6. Up -to -date list of customers and /or owners of individual lots. 7. Letter by Engineer certifying that all water and /or sewer facilities are located within the public right -of -way or dedicated easements. 8. Payment of water usage, laboratory and administrative charges for filling and flushing and bacteriologically certifying water mains from invoice prepared by the Utilities Division. (Obtain payment data from Utilities Division Finance Department) 9. Electrical Contractor's certification on Lift Station electric service wire sizing and voltage drop pursuant to National Electrical Code Specifications 10. One -year (1) warranty for work from Utility Contractor 11. Videotape of gravity sewer facilities constructed 12. Certification of field fire flow capacity testing by the Engineer of Record 13. Letter from Fire District regarding ownership and maintenance of fire hydrants 14. Lift station(s) startup report(s) 15. Letter from Compliance Services Section certifying that the Final Inspection reveals that the Utility Facilities have been constructed in accordance with County Ordinances and regulations ., 171 16. Test and certification of backflow device by the Collier County Cross Connection Control Section, Collier County Utility Division prior to placement of device in service. 17. Coating certification from the manufacturer or a professional testing laboratory for the manholes, wetwells and dry wells. CHECKLIST #3 WATER AND /OR WASTEWATER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE Engineering Documents 1. Five (5) complete sets to include all utilities and all related underground work si ned and sealed by the Engineer of Record for water OR sewer facilities 2. Seven (7) complete sets to include all utilities and all related underground work sned and sealed by the Engineer of Record for water AND sewer facilities. 3. One (1) set of reproducible mylars of record drawings. 4. Verification of final cost (detailed; quantities, sizes, unit cost, total cost, etc.) 5. For all computer generated construction documents, one (1) disk of the master site plan including CUEs and water and /or wastewater facilities. The disk shall be in accordance with Utility Division's layer standards and file format. 6. Certification of completion, placement into service, and other documents required by regulatory agencies. r 171 APPENDIX C UTILITY DEVIATION FORM Please print and complete the Deviation }Form and mail it to Joseph Cheatham, Wastewater Department, or Paul Mattausch, Water Department, at: 3301 Tamiami "Grail East Building H, 3rd Floor Naples, FL., 34112 DEVIATION FORM Petitioners Request Date: Attach Plan or Drawing Site Development Plan required Number (SDP#) Subdivision Improvement required Number 9 Name & Location of Project: Contact Name & Business Phone # Fax # 171 Reason for request? How does this request differ from Ordinance? Impact of this request on affected area? Impact of this request on the maintenance of the Water/Wastewater systems? Explain benefits this request will have to the operation or maintenance of the Collier County Utility system Additional Comments: Water Distribution Routing: Supervisor(s) Approve: Disapprove: Water Director Approve: Disapprove: Wastewater Collections Supervisor Approve: Disapprove: Wastewater Director Approve: Disapprove: Authorizing Signature: Date: Collier County Water Director Authorizing Signature: Date= Collier County Wastewater Director Copy to: Engineering Review & Inspections Public Utilities Administrator Wastewater Collections and Water Distribution I .. 171 .. l 171,-" September 6, 2001 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Friday, September 14, 2001 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: 412 - 273511- 649100 171 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2001, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS ESTABLISHING THE COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES; PROVIDING FINDINGS AND PURPOSE; PROVIDING TITLE AND CITATION; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF PREVIOUS ADOPTED WATER AND SEWER ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SERVICE AREAS BY THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER AUTHORITY; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR POLICIES AND STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL AND DOCUMENT SUBMISSIONS; PROVIDING FOR OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR UTILITIES CONVEYANCE PROCEDURES AND FORMS; PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE OF A UTILITY TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER, AND IRRIGATION FACILITIES; PROVIDING FOR PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NOS. 97 -17, 98 -53 AND 2000 -53; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NOS. CWS -97 -2, MWS -97 -2 AND GWD -97 -2; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are interested parties are invited to attend available for inspection. All and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN 171 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) Ellie J. Hoffman 171 To: jlmoore @naplesnews.com Subject: Notice of hearing to consider Utilities Standards Good Morning, Juanita, Please advertise the above notice as indiated on the attached. Thank you and have a great weekend! Utilities Standards.doc Utilities Standards.doc 171 _ Ellie J. Hoffman From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 8:37 AM To: Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: Delivered: Notice of hearing to consider Utilities Standards ' Notice of hearing to consider... <<Notice of hearing to consider Utilities Standards>> Your message To: 'jlmoore @naplesnews.com' Subject: Notice of hearing to consider Utilities Standards Sent: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 08:38:40 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Moore, Juanita on Fri, 7 Sep 2001 08:36:37 -0400 Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHRIS HORTON PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101 -3016 REFERENCE: 001230 4122735116491 58317116 NOTICE OF INTENT TO State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, -in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 09/14 AD SPACE: FILED ON: 152.000 INCH 09/14/01 Signature of Affiant �� e Sworn to and Subscribed before me this ' day of 20 =`L Personally known by mew 171 BIORy ERV DII F OBSER- VATION PROVIDING mvFy.. ATION ANO MKrvvi4 N TE All MAINTENAp� OF A Per UTILITY TECHNICAL ng to speak on STANDARDS MANU• ' CO"Ido %M must I At CnR SANITARY for ,With the County "'" PENALTY; PKV V 1L- ING FOR AMEND- iimfted to 5 minute MENTS• PROVIDING I any Item. The selectl FOR REPEAL OF OR- , an Individual to spec DINANCE NOS. 97.17, , behalf of on organiz 98.53 AND 2000.53• or group Is encourag PROVIDING FOR THE recognized by the C REPEAL OF RESOLU- man, a spokesperson TION NOS. CWS -97 -2, a group or organlz MWS -97.2 AND GWD- may be allotted 10 97 -2• PROVIDING FOR utes to speak on an Iter CORFLICT AND SEVE- Persons wishing RABiLITY; PROVID. ave written or grc ING FOR INCLUSION materials included In IN THE CODE OF 3oard agenda pac LAWS AND ORDI.'nust submit sold mad NANCES; AND PRO. 1 minimum of 3 w VIDING AN EFFEC- )rior to the respe TIVE DATE. >ublic hearing. In ase, written material , �Mannce are on fille with ended to be consld he Clerk to the Board and IV the Board shall be ware available for inspec- lifted to the appr , t o lon. All Interested parties aunty staff a min f are invited to attend 0_14 seven days prior tc be hearth -- public hearing. All me al used in preserrta before the Board will come a permanent pa the record. Any person who do es to appeal a decislc the Board will need c card of the proceec Pthereto tthherefore may neec ensure {hat a verb record of the proceed .is mode which retort j cludes file testimony ,evidence upon which appeal is based Chanel A McDonald MY CCMMISSIOM # CC850752 EXPIRES - ,_• -�_ June 29, 21703 '• °" ��' BO,, DMIHRUTk0YF,VN'.N`?l1RANCE,INC. 171 BIORy ERV DII F OBSER- VATION PROVIDING mvFy.. ATION ANO MKrvvi4 N TE All MAINTENAp� OF A Per UTILITY TECHNICAL ng to speak on STANDARDS MANU• ' CO"Ido %M must I At CnR SANITARY for ,With the County "'" PENALTY; PKV V 1L- ING FOR AMEND- iimfted to 5 minute MENTS• PROVIDING I any Item. The selectl FOR REPEAL OF OR- , an Individual to spec DINANCE NOS. 97.17, , behalf of on organiz 98.53 AND 2000.53• or group Is encourag PROVIDING FOR THE recognized by the C REPEAL OF RESOLU- man, a spokesperson TION NOS. CWS -97 -2, a group or organlz MWS -97.2 AND GWD- may be allotted 10 97 -2• PROVIDING FOR utes to speak on an Iter CORFLICT AND SEVE- Persons wishing RABiLITY; PROVID. ave written or grc ING FOR INCLUSION materials included In IN THE CODE OF 3oard agenda pac LAWS AND ORDI.'nust submit sold mad NANCES; AND PRO. 1 minimum of 3 w VIDING AN EFFEC- )rior to the respe TIVE DATE. >ublic hearing. In ase, written material , �Mannce are on fille with ended to be consld he Clerk to the Board and IV the Board shall be ware available for inspec- lifted to the appr , t o lon. All Interested parties aunty staff a min f are invited to attend 0_14 seven days prior tc be hearth -- public hearing. All me al used in preserrta before the Board will come a permanent pa the record. Any person who do es to appeal a decislc the Board will need c card of the proceec Pthereto tthherefore may neec ensure {hat a verb record of the proceed .is mode which retort j cludes file testimony ,evidence upon which appeal is based 171 -r-ft Ellie J. Hoffman From: Mary Brock Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:22 PM To: Maureen K. Kenyon; Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: FW: Public Hearing FYI -- thanks, Mary -Jo • - - - -- Original Message - - - -- • From: McgeeJim • Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 1:18 PM • To: brock_m • Subject: Public Hearing • The proposed ordinance "Consolidate the Utilities Standards and • Procedures" has been advertised for public hearing. I am now informed that • the DSAC must approve on their Oct. 3 meeting. The Clerk's office suggests • that the advertisement is good for five weeks and that we should simply • continue the item on the September 25 agenda to the October 9 meeting. • Thanks, • Jim McGee 1 1 ., ORDINANCE NO. 2001- 5 7 COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES AN ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS ESTABLISHING THE COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES; PROVIDING FINDINGS AND PURPOSE; PROVIDING TITLE AND CITATION; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCORPORATION OF PREVIOUS ADOPTED WATER AND SEWER ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTIONS; PROVIDING FOR SERVICE AREAS BY THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER AUTHORITY; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR POLICIES AND STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL AND DOCUMENT SUBMISSIONS; PROVIDING FOR OBSERVATION OF CONSTRUCTION; PROVIDING FOR UTILITIES CONVEYANCE PROCEDURES AND FORMS; PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION AND PERIODIC MAINTENANCE OF A UTILITY TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATER, AND IRRIGATION FACILITIES; PROVIDING FOR PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENTS; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NOS. 97-17,98-53 AND 2000 -53; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF RESOLUTION NOS. CWS -97 -2, MWS -97 -2, AND GWD -97 -2; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County and Resolved as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District, has determined that it is in the best interests of the public's health, safety, and welfare to establish the minimum utility requirements for development of potable water, wastewater, and irrigation water facilities within the unincorporated areas of Collier County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND RESOLVED AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, THE MARCO WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT AND THE GOODLAND WATER DISTRICT, that: TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE FINDINGS AND PURPOSE SECTION TWO TITLE AND CITATION SECTION THREE: APPLICABILITY SECTION FOUR WATER AND SEWER ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS SECTION FIVE SERVICE AREAS SECTION SIX DEFINITIONS SECTION POLICIES AND STANDARDS SEVEN 7.1 Utility Service: Availability 7.2 FDEP Permits 171 SECTION CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL & DOCUMENT Design and Performance Standard 7 3 Manuals and Publications 7.4 Utility Leases Construction Documents Construction Observation and 7.5 Inspection 8.2.1 Construction Utilities Conveyance and 7.6 Acceptance 7.7 Utility Easement 8.2.2 Conference Building Permits — Connection Fees 7.8 and Charges 7.9 Certificates of Occupancy SECTION CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL & DOCUMENT EIGHT SUBMISSION 9.2 8.1 General 8.2 Construction Documents Construction Observation and Preparation of Inspection 8.2.1 Construction 9.4.1 General Documents Construction Presubmittal 9.4.2 Inspections by 8.2.2 Conference 8.2.3 Submittals Schedule of 8.2.4 Fees and Charges Plans, Specifications 8.2.5 and Cost Estimates Ordinance 80- 8.2.6 112 Rights-of-Way 8.2.7 Permits 8.3 Fire Control District Approval 8.4 Plats 8.5 Utilities Performance Security 8.6 Construction Commencement 8.7 Construction Document Modification SECTION CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND INSPECTION NINE 9.1 General 9.2 Pre- Construction Meeting 9.3 Construction Scheduling Construction Observation and 9.4 Inspection 9.4.1 General Construction 9.4.2 Inspections by 2 9.4.3 9.4.4 171 County Preliminary Inspections Final Inspections SECTION UTILITIES CONVEYANCE PROCEDURES TEN 10.1 General Water 10.01.1 Line Acceptance Gravity Sewer 10.01.2 Line Acceptance Lift Station 10.03.1 and Force Main Acceptance 10.2 Conveyance Documents 10.3 Inspection 10.4 Record Construction Drawings 10.5 Bacterial Analysis 10.6 Final Costs 10.7 Test Results 10.8 Lift Station Submittals 10.9 Recordation Fees SECTION Not used ELEVEN SECTION Not used TEWLVE SECTION THIRTEEN .. AMENDMENTS SECTION FOURTEEN ...PENALTY SECTION FIFTEEN ..... REPEAL OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS SECTION SIXTEEN..... INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS & ORDINANCES SECTION SEVENTEEN .. CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY SECTION EIGHTEEN ... EFFECTIVE DATE 3 APPENDIX A STANDARD LEGAL DOCUMENTS APPENDIX B CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT CHECKLIST SECTION APPENDIX C UTILITY DEVIATION FORM SECTION ONE. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE It is the intent and purpose of this Ordinance to promote, protect, and improve the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Collier County by the establishment, herein, of standards and procedures for the construction, development, maintenance, and operation of safe, reliable water and wastewater systems, that meet the &mands of Collier County's rapid land development and population growth and that are constructed, developed, maintained and operated according to the latest technical and professional standards. This Ordinance, therefore, establishes minimum utility requirements for development of water transmission and distribution and for wastewater collection and transmission facilities within the unincorporated areas of Collier County, Florida. This Ordinance attempts to ensure that, with respect to all utility construction performed reliable and economical utility services shall be provided to users of the water and/or wastewater systems within Collier County. All requirements set forth herein are in conjunction with and supplemental to the Collier County Land Development Code (the "LDC "), to the Collier County Growth Management Plan and to such other applicable Collier County Ordinances, Resolutions and/or regulations as are related to land development and/or subdivision of lands within Collier County. The administrative procedures, ordinances, and policies contained herein, as they apply to the extension and/or development of water and/or wastewater facilities and utility service, shall take precedence if in conflict, over those contained in the LDC. Public Utilities shall review variations, from the standards and procedures established herein, which are brought about by innovative applications of design principles /solutions to individual projects. Upon such review, the Public Utilities Administrator, in his discretion, may approve such variations, provided that, such variation shall not result in system/facility operation or maintenance performance that is less than that which would be provided, in this Ordinance, if recognized, accepted standards are used, and provided further that such variation promotes, protects, and improves the health, safety and welfare of Collier County, Florida. The Collier County Water -Sewer District, established in February 1977, by the Board of County Commissioners, was created for the following purposes: 1) to develop safe, reliable and financially self - supporting potable water and sanitary sewage systems which will meet the water and sewerage needs of the rapidly developing areas of Collier County; 2) to ensure that existing and future water and/or wastewater utility systems are constructed, operated and managed at the minimum cost to users and with no direct/indirect financial aid from the General Fund; and 3) to develop water and/or wastewater systems requiring the most reasonable operating and maintenance costs. Sectionll (Wastewater Technical Specifications) and Section 12 (Water Technical Specifications) and Appendix C (Standard Details) have purposely been omitted. These documents are now included in the COLLIER UTILITIES TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL. By reference, the Public Utilities Administrator shall publish the MANUAL and 4 0. 171 APPENDIX A STANDARD LEGAL DOCUMENTS APPENDIX B CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT CHECKLIST SECTION APPENDIX C UTILITY DEVIATION FORM SECTION ONE. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE It is the intent and purpose of this Ordinance to promote, protect, and improve the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Collier County by the establishment, herein, of standards and procedures for the construction, development, maintenance, and operation of safe, reliable water and wastewater systems, that meet the &mands of Collier County's rapid land development and population growth and that are constructed, developed, maintained and operated according to the latest technical and professional standards. This Ordinance, therefore, establishes minimum utility requirements for development of water transmission and distribution and for wastewater collection and transmission facilities within the unincorporated areas of Collier County, Florida. This Ordinance attempts to ensure that, with respect to all utility construction performed reliable and economical utility services shall be provided to users of the water and/or wastewater systems within Collier County. All requirements set forth herein are in conjunction with and supplemental to the Collier County Land Development Code (the "LDC "), to the Collier County Growth Management Plan and to such other applicable Collier County Ordinances, Resolutions and/or regulations as are related to land development and/or subdivision of lands within Collier County. The administrative procedures, ordinances, and policies contained herein, as they apply to the extension and/or development of water and/or wastewater facilities and utility service, shall take precedence if in conflict, over those contained in the LDC. Public Utilities shall review variations, from the standards and procedures established herein, which are brought about by innovative applications of design principles /solutions to individual projects. Upon such review, the Public Utilities Administrator, in his discretion, may approve such variations, provided that, such variation shall not result in system/facility operation or maintenance performance that is less than that which would be provided, in this Ordinance, if recognized, accepted standards are used, and provided further that such variation promotes, protects, and improves the health, safety and welfare of Collier County, Florida. The Collier County Water -Sewer District, established in February 1977, by the Board of County Commissioners, was created for the following purposes: 1) to develop safe, reliable and financially self - supporting potable water and sanitary sewage systems which will meet the water and sewerage needs of the rapidly developing areas of Collier County; 2) to ensure that existing and future water and/or wastewater utility systems are constructed, operated and managed at the minimum cost to users and with no direct/indirect financial aid from the General Fund; and 3) to develop water and/or wastewater systems requiring the most reasonable operating and maintenance costs. Sectionll (Wastewater Technical Specifications) and Section 12 (Water Technical Specifications) and Appendix C (Standard Details) have purposely been omitted. These documents are now included in the COLLIER UTILITIES TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL. By reference, the Public Utilities Administrator shall publish the MANUAL and 4 171 provide for annual revisions thereto, consistent with good engineering practices and standards. SECTION TWO: TITLE AND CITATION This Ordinance shall be known and may be cited as the "Collier County Utility Standards and Procedures Ordinance." SECTION THREE: APPLICABILITY This Ordinance shall be applicable to development activities, within the unincorporated areas of Collier County, Florida. For the purposes of simplicity and brevity, references herein, to Collier County Water -Sewer District shall also refer to the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District, where appropriate, as the context requires. This Ordinance shall not apply to the Immokalee Water -Sewer District, which was created by Special Act of the State Legislature as an Independent District. SECTION FOUR: WATER AND SEWER ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS To implement the objectives set forth in this Ordinance, the Board of County Commissioners, acting in their regular capacity, as well as, their capacity as the Ex- Officio Governing Board of the various water and/or sewer districts, has adopted Ordinances, Ordinance amendments and Resolutions on behalf of the County and the various Districts, and therefore, such Ordinances, Ordinance amendments and Resolutions, together with all such duly adopted subsequent Ordinances, Ordinance amendments and Resolutions relating to the standards and procedures regarding water and/or wastewater and/or irrigation water utilities within Collier County are incorporated in this Ordinance by reference. SECTION FIVE: SERVICE AREAS The following requirements shall apply with respect to the County's review of utility construction within Service Areas in the unincorporated area: 5.1 Construction shall comply with the LDC and with the TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL. Requested deviations from the requirements of this Ordinance shall be referred to the Water and Wastewater Departments for resolution. 5.2 Within the Collier County Water and Wastewater certificated Service Areas and other Board approved Service Areas, which are granted to individual or joint development projects and which are providing interim utility service, the utility construction documents for each project shall comply with this Ordinance. Construction shall not commence until the documents have been reviewed and approved by the County and thereafter, the County has issued a written authorization to construct. Conveyance of completed interim utility facilities within these certificated or other approved Service Areas shall be in compliance with this Ordinance. SECTION SIX: DEFINITIONS 6.1 For the purposes of this Ordinance, the following terms, phrases, and words, shall have the meaning specified herein. When not inconsistent with the context, words in the present 5 171 .a tense include future tense, words used in the singular number include the plural, and words used in the plural include the singular. "Shall' is always mandatory; "may" is discretionary. 6.2 Board: Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida, and, where appropriate, as the Ex- Officio Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, the Marco Water and Sewer District, and/or the Goodland Water District. 6.3 CCWSD or District: The Collier County Water -Sewer District, and the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District, where appropriate, as the context requires. 6.4 Construction Document: Construction drawings, technical specifications, hydraulic design reports, Florida Department of Environmental Protection ( "FDEP ") Permit Application, Plats, where required, and other supportive documents and data necessary to permit the review of proposed water and/or wastewater system improvements. 6.5 Contractor: Individual, partnership, agency, organization, corporation or the like licensed in the State of Florida to do underground utility construction in Collier County. 6.6 County: Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida and when the context requires or warrants, shall refer to the Public Utilities Administrator and/or the Division designee. 6.7 County Inspector: A representative of Collier County designated to provide periodic inspection of all water and/or wastewater system construction. 6.8 Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee (DSAQ: The 15 member committee created pursuant to Ordinance No. 95-60 to provide reports and recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners to assist in the enhancement of the operational efficiency and budgetary accountability within the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and to serve as a primary communications link between the Division, the development industry and the citizens of Collier County. 6.9 Community Development and Environmental Services Division: Division of Collier County which, for purposes of this Ordinance, shall be responsible for processing, reviewing and approving water and/or wastewater service requests, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance and/or the LDC, including the engineering evaluation, design and construction of public water and/or wastewater utility systems. As outlined herein, and as set forth in the LDC the "Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator" shall mean the site development review director and any successor in function. 6.10 CUE: Collier County Utility Easement. 6.11 Developer: An individual, partnership, corporation, owner, sub - divider, including a governmental agency, or designated agents, successors, or assigns, or such other entity that proposes and/or undertakes the construction of public water and/or wastewater facilities to provide service for any property or properties, area development or subdivision in which the water or wastewater facilities are to be extended from, connected to or ultimately become part D of the water supply or wastewater system of Collier County Water -Sewer District, Collier County, Florida. 6.12 Distribution Mains: Potable or irrigation mains less than 16" in diameter that distribute water at the project or customer level. 6.13 Easement: An interest in land, granted to holder by owner of land. Such grant entitles holder to a specific limited use or enjoyment. Holder can be person, persons or the public generally. 6.14 Effluent: The treated liquid end product of a wastewater treatment facility, that is reused as reclaimed water for irrigation or other approved purposes. 6.15 Engineer of Record: The "Project Engineer," a registered professional engineer of record responsible for the preparation of plans and specifications and other related design documents for the water and/or wastewater facilities being constructed within Collier County, and responsible for certifying the project upon completion. 6.16 Fee: means the non - reimbursable monetary compensation rendered to the County for construction document review and inspection service provided. 6.17 F.A.C.: Florida Administrative Code. 6.18 FDEP: Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State Agency responsible for regulating environmental programs and water and/or wastewater utility systems within the State of Florida. 6.19 FDOT. Florida Department of Transportation. 6.20 Inspection: Periodic construction site visits by a County representative the purpose of which is to ascertain/insure compliance with County- approved construction documents. Such periodic visits shall occur during construction of the water and/or wastewater improvements, after completion of construction for preliminary acceptance prior to conveyance of the required water and/or wastewater facilities to the District, and after the one (1 ) year Contractual Guarantee period for final acceptance of the water and/or wastewater facilities by the County. 6.21 Interim Utility Facility. A water distribution, transmission treatment and/or supply facility, a wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and/or disposal facility, which, while under construction, is owned by the applicant/developer or other person/entity other than the CCWSD or other dependent District, and which, upon completion of construction, shall be dedicated to CCWSD or other dependent District. Such facilities shall remain interim if the CCWSD or other dependent District utility facilities are not available for connection and in such event, shall be leased back to the applicant/developer, pursuant to a Facilities Agreement, with operation and maintenance responsibilities, until such time as the CCWSD or other dependent District, where appropriate, are available for connection. 6.21A Irrigation System: Any and all plant, system, facility or property, and additions, extensions and improvements thereto at then future times, constructed or acquired as part 7 171 of the water supply or wastewater system of Collier County Water -Sewer District, Collier County, Florida. 6.12 Distribution Mains: Potable or irrigation mains less than 16" in diameter that distribute water at the project or customer level. 6.13 Easement: An interest in land, granted to holder by owner of land. Such grant entitles holder to a specific limited use or enjoyment. Holder can be person, persons or the public generally. 6.14 Effluent: The treated liquid end product of a wastewater treatment facility, that is reused as reclaimed water for irrigation or other approved purposes. 6.15 Engineer of Record: The "Project Engineer," a registered professional engineer of record responsible for the preparation of plans and specifications and other related design documents for the water and/or wastewater facilities being constructed within Collier County, and responsible for certifying the project upon completion. 6.16 Fee: means the non - reimbursable monetary compensation rendered to the County for construction document review and inspection service provided. 6.17 F.A.C.: Florida Administrative Code. 6.18 FDEP: Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the State Agency responsible for regulating environmental programs and water and/or wastewater utility systems within the State of Florida. 6.19 FDOT. Florida Department of Transportation. 6.20 Inspection: Periodic construction site visits by a County representative the purpose of which is to ascertain/insure compliance with County- approved construction documents. Such periodic visits shall occur during construction of the water and/or wastewater improvements, after completion of construction for preliminary acceptance prior to conveyance of the required water and/or wastewater facilities to the District, and after the one (1 ) year Contractual Guarantee period for final acceptance of the water and/or wastewater facilities by the County. 6.21 Interim Utility Facility. A water distribution, transmission treatment and/or supply facility, a wastewater collection, transmission, treatment and/or disposal facility, which, while under construction, is owned by the applicant/developer or other person/entity other than the CCWSD or other dependent District, and which, upon completion of construction, shall be dedicated to CCWSD or other dependent District. Such facilities shall remain interim if the CCWSD or other dependent District utility facilities are not available for connection and in such event, shall be leased back to the applicant/developer, pursuant to a Facilities Agreement, with operation and maintenance responsibilities, until such time as the CCWSD or other dependent District, where appropriate, are available for connection. 6.21A Irrigation System: Any and all plant, system, facility or property, and additions, extensions and improvements thereto at then future times, constructed or acquired as part 7 r 171 .1 thereof, useful or necessary or having the then present capacity for future use in connection with the development of sources, treatment or purification and distribution of irrigation water, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes dams, wells, meters, reservoirs, storage tanks, lines, valves, pumping stations, laterals and pipes for the purpose of carrying irrigation water to the premises connected with such system; also includes all real and personal property and any interest or rights therein, easements, and franchises of any nature whatsoever relating to any such system and necessary or convenient for the operation thereof 6.22 LDC: Collier County Land Development Code, as amended from time to time. 6.23 Lateral Sewer: A sewer which discharges into a branch or other sewer facilities and has only building sewers tributary to it. 6.24 Letter of Commitment: Written verification from a privately -owned or franchised utility as outlined in Sec. 7. 1, which a Developer is required to submit to County prior to submittal of construction document. This Letter shall clearly verify the type and capacity of water and/or wastewater utility services available, as well as any restrictions or requirements the utility may have regarding issuance of a binding written commitment for service to a proposed development. 6.25 Master Plan Development: A tentative plan showing the proposed development of a tract of land for which development is to be carried out in one (1) or more stages. See: Site Alteration Plan, Site Development Plan, and Site Improvement Plan as described in LDC. 6.26 Modification: Revisions to construction documents, as requested by the Engineer of Record and which have been approved by the County, when such revision necessitates an additional review and approval process. Revisions requested by the County are exempt from this fee. 6.27 Non- Potable Water Facility: A facility used as a source of water for irrigation, cooling, or other uses. Facilities used as a source for drinking, culinary or domestic purposes are excluded from the definition of non potable water supply wells. 6.28 Person or Entity: Individual, partnership, agency, association, private or public corporation, organization, or political subdivision or the like which desires to construct water and/or wastewater system improvements and/or requires the services of the County. 6.29 Potable Water Facility: Facility used as a source for drinking, culinary, or domestic purposes. 6.30 Probable Cost of Construction: Cost estimate prepared by the Engineer of Record for the water and/or wastewater system improvements submitted for review. 6.31 Project: Water and/or wastewater system improvements illustrated and described in the construction documents for the development of land in the unincorporated areas of Collier County. 632 Public Utilities Division: Division of Collier County comprised of various departments including Water and Wastewater Departments. Public Utilities is responsible for the 171 management, operation and maintenance of the Collier County Water -Sewer District. The Public Utilities Division, together with the Community Development and Environmental Services Division shall have the responsibility for approving water, wastewater, and, in some cases, effluent irrigation system requests and the engineering evaluation, including the design and construction for all County -owned water, wastewater and effluent irrigation systems as outlined within this Ordinance. Requested variation(s) from the requirements of this Ordinance shall be referred to the Water and Wastewater Departments for resolution and require a written response from the Public Utilities Administrator (PUA) in order to be implemented. 6.33 Right -of -Way: A strip of land, public or private, occupied or intended to be occupied by a street, crosswalk, railroad, electric transmission line, oil or gas pipeline, storm drainage way, water main, sanitary or storm sewer main, or for similar special use. The usage of the term "right -of -way" for land platting purposes shall mean that every right -oway, whether public or private, or as an easement, hereafter established and shown on a plat is to be separate and distinct from the lots or parcels adjoining such right -of -way and not included within the dimensions or areas of such lots or parcels. 6.34 Sanitary Sewer Facility: A wastewater utility facility. 6.35 Service: Work incurred by the County to review and approve water and/or wastewater system construction documents and provide inspection during and after construction of said improvements. 6.36 Sewerage System, Central ( "Wastewater System, Central "): A system for the collection and disposal of sewage, in accordance with the approval of requisite federal, state, and county agencies. The system shall serve residential dwellings, commercial, industrial, institutional or other uses and shall include pipes, manholes, pumps, wet wells, tanks, treatment plants and other appurtenances, that comprise the system. 6.37 Sewerage System, Individual (Wastewater System, Individual "): A system designed to serve one unit (as defined in the health code used by Collier County) comprised of pipes, tanks, and subsurface absorption field, or other approved treatment device, for handling and disposing of sewage wastes. 6.38 Service Area: The geographical area described in a Franchise Certificate or other approval granted by the Board to a utility to provide utility service within the boundaries of a specified geographic area or areas and the geographical areas served by the Board. The geographical area may be referred to also as "territory," "service areas," or "certificated area." 6.39 Sewer Service: A gravity sewer pipe, that extends from the main sewer pipe to the customer's point of connection at the public right -of -way or the utility easement limit. 6.40 SFWMD: The South Florida Water Management District, established pursuant to Chapter 373, Fla. Slat. 6.41 Transmission Mains: Potable or irrigation mains 16" in diameter and larger that distribute water over a regional or sub - regional area. 0 171 6.42 Unincorporated Area: Areas lying outside any established corporate city or municipal boundary line and outside the boundaries of any independent Special Improvement District or service area established by the State Legislature for water and sewer service. 6.43 Utility: Any person or business entity, lessee, trustee and/or receiver, owning, operating, managing, or controlling a system, or proposing construction of a system, who or which is providing or proposes to provide potable water and/or non - potable water, or bulk water, and/or wastewater service, or any combination thereof, within any unincorporated area of the County to the public for compensation, but excluding only the following: a) Property used solely or principally in the business of bottling, selling, distributing or furnishing bottled water or portable treatment facilities; or b) Systems owned, operated, managed, or controlled by a Governmental Agency; or c) Manufacturers providing such utility service solely in connection with their own manufacturing operations; or d) Each public lodging establishment providing such utility service solely in connection with lodging service to its guests; or e) Each landlord or Homeowners' Association providing utility service to their own tenants or unit owners without specific compensation for any such utility service; or f) Each water system and/or sewer system which has a rated capacity (at maximum day system peak) of less than 2,000 gallons per day per utility service; or g) Any Utility that derives less than fifty percent (50 %) of its revenues from unincorporated areas of the County with the balance derived from the incorporated area. Any Utility which derives fifty percent (50 %) or more of its revenues from the unincorporated areas of the County shall be subject to the provisions of this Ordinance as they relate to only the rates, fees, and charges charged by the Utility in its unincorporated area(s); or h) Any utility system that is then serving less than one hundred (100) customers with water and/or sewer service. For the purpose of this subparagraph, a "customer" is not each individual served. Each residence, apartment unit, condominium unit, office or other unit of a building or structure, each mobile home, each recreational vehicle, etc., is one (1) customer. A duplex is two (2) customers; a triplex is three (3) customers, etc. i) Systems solely for tenants or occupants of governmental buildings, religious, educational or cultural institutions or facilities, or for recreational, scientific or institutional facilities. 10 r� 171 J) Systems not owned by a Franchisee that are downline from the Franchisee's master meter and are operated and sub metered by a master metered customer of the Franchisee for resale to individual residential or commercial consumers occupying property owned or otherwise lawfully controlled by that master metered customer. 6.44 Utility Code Subcommittee of DSAC: A subcommittee of DSAC, created pursuant to Ordinance No. 95 -60 to review and make recommendations on technical and other issues relating to utility matters and to act as a liaison between the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and the Public Utilities Division on such matters. 6.45 Utilities Performance Security (UPS): A Performance Bond, Cash Bond or an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, or other authorized form of security furnished by a community development district pursuant to the LDC, furnished by the Developer to the County or the District, prior to commencement of construction, for all water and wastewater construction to guarantee the construction and the workmanship and materials for the warranty period after the utility facilities have been conveyed to the County or appropriate Water -Sewer District, or upon completion of the utility facilities when construction occurs on private property. See Sec. 8.5 for specific details on this Performance Security. 6.46 Water Service: A water service installation which includes: tapping saddle, corporation stop, service line and meter installation, meter box and backflow prevention device, if required, extended to property line or utility easement limit. 6.47 Wastewater: "Sewage," or "sewerage," means a combination of the liquid and water- carried pollutants from a residence, commercial building, industrial plant, or institution, together with any groundwater, surface runoff, or leachate that may be present. 6.48 Wastewater System: "Sewer," "sewer system," or "sewerage system" means any and all plant, system, facility or property, and additions, extensions and improvements thereto at any future time constructed to acquire as part thereof, useful or necessary or then having capacity for future use in connection with the collection, treatment, purification and disposal of sewage of any nature, originating from any source, and without limiting the generality of fie foregoing, includes treatment plants, pumping stations, lift stations, valves, force mains, intercepting sewers, laterals, pressure lines, mains, and all necessary appurtenances and equipment; also includes all wastewater mains and laterals for the reception and collection of sewage from premises connected therewith; also includes all real and personal property and any interest therein, rights, easements, and franchises of any nature relating to any such system and necessary or convenient for the operation thereof. 6.49 Water System: Any and all plant, system, facility or property, and additions, extensions and improvements thereto at then future times, constructed or acquired as part thereof, useful or necessary or having the then present capacity for future use in connection with the development of sources, treatment or purification and distribution of water, and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, includes dams, reservoirs, storage tanks, lines, valves, pumping stations, laterals and pipes for the purpose of carrying water to the premises connected with such system; also includes all real and personal property and any interest or rights therein, 11 r 171 .. easements, and franchises of any nature whatsoever relating to any such system and necessary or convenient for the operation thereof SECTION SEVEN: POLICIES AND STANDARDS 7.1 Utility Service: Availability As a requirement to Developer's submittal of construction documents, Developer shall obtain prior written verification, from the Public Utilities Division, which shall 1) ascertain the current status of utility service, if any; 2) identify restrictions, if any, of availability of such services; 3) provide pertinent facts regarding location and availability of County's existing and/or proposed utility systems. The Division shall respond in writing to all such requests. Provided that, if current and available County utility facilities do not exist, Developer shall provide, or otherwise obtain, interim utility service, only, to the subject property. In the event the proposed development is outside the service area of the CCWSD, but within the Service Area of a private or franchised utility company, a Letter of Commitment for service must be submitted from the private or franchised utility outside its Service Area upon approval by the Board. The Letter shall clearly describe the type and capacity of the utility services available, as well as any restrictions or requirements the Utility may have regarding the issuance of a binding written commitment for service to ,the proposed development. In the event that central water and/or wastewater service is not available to a proposed project, it shall be the Developer's responsibility to clearly and fully detail the steps that will be taken to provide interimutility services. 7.2 FDEP Permits With respect to development and/or release of FDEP Construction Permit Applications from the Community Development and Environmental Services Division, approval of the construction documents for the water and/or wastewater facilities is mandatory before the County executes and releases applications for any required FDEP permits. Prior to commencement of construction, FDEP permit must be issued. Provided that, with respect to development of and/or construction activities for an interim utility facility, the Developer may obtain executed FDEP permit applications prior to County's final written approval of construction documents. However, under no circumstances shall construction commence with such an interim utility facility until the construction commencement criteria in Section 8.6 have been met. With respect to those service areas outside the CCWSD, copies of all approved FDEP construction and operating permits shall be submitted to the County immediately upon issuance and receipt. With respect to the FDEP Certification of Completion of Construction forms, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division will have the forms executed by the Public Utilities Division after they receive the Preliminary Inspection approval letter during the Preliminary Acceptance process. Community Development and Environmental Services will release the forms as soon as they are returned to them. 12 171 7.3 Design and Performance Standard Manuals and Publications The minimal, but mandatory, utility design requirements of this Ordinance are established by the most recent technical standards, procedures and criteria, as set forth in the latest edition of the publications, listed below, and as are supplemented by the standards specifically setforth in the Technical Standards Manual. The minimal, but mandatory, utility design requirements set forth in the listed publications are incorporated herein and are, thereby, an integral part of this Ordinance. Deviation from the established criteria, as set forth below in the manuals /publications, is not precluded, provided that, the Engineer of Record shall provide, for County's review, a design deviation based on such rational criteria that promotes, protects, and/or improves the public's health, safety and welfare and upon such showing, receives the County's prior written approval. County approval shall not be granted to any proposed design that jeopardizes the public health, safety and welfare, or that otherwise would result in a system performance less than that which would otherwise be provided to the public by adherence to the recognized and accepted industry standards set forth in the following manuals /publications: 7.3.1 Water Pollution Control Federation, Manual of Practice No. 8, Wastewater Treatment Plant Design, W.P.C.F., 2626 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. 7.3.2 Water Pollution Control Federation, Manual of Practice No. 9, Design and Construction of Sanitary and Storm Sewers, W.P.C.F., 2626 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. 7.3.3 Great Lakes/Upper Mississippi River Board of State Sanitary Engineers, 1978 or latest edition. Recommended Standards for Sewage Works, Health Education Service, Inc., P.O. Box 7283, Albany, New York 12224. 7.3.4 Great Lakes/Upper Mississippi River Board of State Sanitary Engineers, 1982 or latest edition. Recommended Standards for Water Works, Health Education Service, Inc., P.O. Box 7283, Albany, New York 12224. 7.3.5 Rules of the Department of Environmental Protection, Chapter 17 -6, Wastewater Facilities and Chapter 17 -22, Water Suppliers. 7.3.6 American Water Works Association, Inc., Water Treatment Plant Design. AWWA, 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado, 80235. 7.3.7 American Water Works Association, AWWA Standards. AWWA, 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80235. 7.3.8 Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association, Handbook, Ductile Iron Pipe /Cast Iron Pipe. Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association, 245 Riverchase Parkway East, Birmingham, Alabama 35244. 7.3.9 Uni -Bell Plastic Pipe Association, Handbook of PVC Pipe, Uni -Bell Plastic Pipe Association, 2655 Villa Creek Drive, Suite 164, Dallas, Texas 75234. 7.3. 10 American National Standards Institute, latest revision. 13 171 7.3.11 American Society for Testing and Materials, Volumes 1.02, 4.01, 4.02, 4.05, 6.02. 7.3.12 American Water Works Association, Inc., AWWA Manual, M -14, 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80235. 7.3.13 American Water Works Association, Inc., AWWA Manual, M -22, 6666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80235. 7.3.14 Collier County Utilities Technical Standards Manual 7.4 Utility Leases Water and/or wastewater facilities constructed for a development which cannot immediately connect to a District owned- and - operated system shall be dedicated to the Board, or as appropriate to the context, the Marco Water and Sewer District or the Goodland Water District, and, at the time of such dedication, shall be leased -back to the Owner of such water and/or wastewater treatment facility. Such facility shall be deemed an interim utility facility for the lease term, i.e., until such time, as such facility is capable of and is, in fact, connected to a District owned- and - operated system. At no time shall the District operate and/or maintain an interim utility facility. The terms and conditions of such lease term shall be set forth pursuant to a written lease agreement, "Facilities Agreement," executed by and between the Owner/Developer and Board/District, the standard form of which is set forth in Appendix A, as may be amended. The Facilities Agreement shall further set forth the terms, conditions, and mutual responsibilities of the signatory parties, their successors, and assigns, with respect to the dedication, the lease -back, the operation and maintenance of such interim utility facility, and the ultimate connection to the off -site facility owned and operated by the Board. Each Facility Agreement shall be negotiated on a case -by -case basis, agreed to and executed by and between the parties prior to construction commencement of the proposed facilities. Such Facilities Agreement shall be a part of the legal documents to be approved and accepted by the Board at the time that the water and/or wastewater facilities are conveyed to the Board. Project developers, their successors, or assigns, shall be responsible for costs incurred by County in order to maintain interim utility facilities in compliance with FDEP water quality regulations. Such costs shall be borne by the Developers, their successors, or assigns, until sufficient construction has occurred, to create usage significant enough to properly maintain the system without additional maintenance activities on the part of County. Charges for water used shall be billed at the District irrigation rate. 7.5 Construction Observation and Inspection The construction of all water and/or wastewater facilities must be observed and certified by the Engineer of Record and be inspected by the County. The nature and extent of the construction observation and inspection is detailed in Section 9.4. 7.6 Utilities Conveyance and Acceptance The transfer of ownership of any utility facility, including an interim utility facility, to the District shall comply with the requirements of law, as set forth in theFlorida Statutes, County 14 Resolutions, and/or Ordinance Nos. 78 -10 and 79 -33, as amended and/or their successors. Reference Section 10: Utility Conveyance Procedures. 7.7 Utility Easement All uses of Collier County utility easements (CUE) shall be in accordance with this Ordinance or other Board approved uses and shall be for the exclusive sub - surface use of the Board or other County approved uses. All CUES shall comply with relevant LDC requirements, unless specifically authorized to do otherwise, in writing by the Water and/or Wastewater Directors. Any other use of a CUE not authorized by County and/or approved by the Board is prohibited, other than service crossings. Any use of a CUE that creates a hazard to the water and/or wastewater facilities or the employees of the Board/County /CCWSD in the performance of their duties is prohibited. Private road right -of -ways with CUE overlays are exempt from the exclusive use provision, however, all design setback and construction requirements of the Ordinance shall be adhered to. Privately -owned utilities may be allowed within a CUE, subject to prior approval by the County, and provided that such privately -owned utility does not hinder operation and maintenance activities or does not create an unnecessary financial burden to the rate payers of the District. Aboveground improvements such as, but not limited to, paved parking, decorative walls and landscaping shall be permitted to be installed within a CUE by the grantor, its successors or assigns. However, the cost of any and all repair, replacement, maintenance and restoration of the aforementioned improvements shall be the sole financial responsibility of the grantor, its successors or assigns as set forth in the County's standard CUE language. Combined water -sewer easements shall be agreed upon on a case-by-case basis, dependent on depth of lines and shall not be combined, unless and until approved by the Water and Wastewater Directors and the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. Width of Easements. a) Minimum width of water main, force main, and/or effluent main easements shall be 15 feet. b) Minimum width of gravity sewer easements shall be twice the depth of the line or 15 feet, whichever is greater; and c) Lift station easements shall be twice the depth by twice the depth of the lift station or 30 feet by 30 feet, whichever is greater; and d) Combined water -sewer easements shall be agreed upon on a case -by -case basis, dependent upon depth of lines. Minimum distance between water and sewer lines shall be 10 feet as required by FDEP and this Ordinance. 15 171 7.8 Building Permits — Connection Fees and Charges County shall not approve the issuance of a building permit until the utility construction documents, together with the associated Plat has been reviewed and approved pursuant to the LDC, and all appropriate water and/or wastewater system development charges, impact fees and connection fees have been paid. The Developer shall be responsible for coordinating development activities with the County, to ensure that all the necessary utility construction documents, plats, etc., are submitted for review and approval. Temporary use permits shall be exempt from the utility construction document approval requirement prior to Building Permit approval, unless specific conditions preclude such exemption. 7.9 Certificates of Occupancy A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued for any structure prior to preliminary acceptance of all water and/or wastewater facilities required by this Ordinance or the LDC. SECTION EIGHT: CONSTRUCTION APPROVAL AND DOCUMENT SUBMISSIONS 8.1 General This section establishes the County's minimum requirements, pursuant to, or in addition to, the minimum LDC requirements, for the submission of the following construction documents, by the Developer /Owner and/or Contractor, for County's review; however, County may require additional data, as County deems necessary, to complete its review of: a) Water and/or wastewater facilities for proposed new developments connected to existing water and/or wastewater systems; and b) Water and/or wastewater facilities for proposed new developments to be served by interim water and/or wastewater treatment plants. 8.2 Construction Documents 8.2.1 Preparation of Construction Documents. Construction drawings and technical specifications for the construction, extension and/or modification of water and/or wastewater facilities shall be prepared by, or under the supervision of, and shall be certified by the Engineer of Record, a Professional Engineer, licensed to practice in the State of Florida, under Chapter 471, Florida Statutes. 8.2.2 Presubmittal Conference. It is recommended that prior to initial submission to County of construction documents, the Owner/Developer or their authorized agent, (the "applicant ") confer with the Public Utilities Administrator and Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator to obtain information and guidance, to initiate an informal preliminary review, pursuant to the LDC, as may be amended, before substantial commitments of time and/or money are made in preparation and submission of further documentation. 8.2.3 Submittals. Unless instructed otherwise at the Presubmittal Conference, initial submittal of construction documents, together with any supportive materials, shall be submitted to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator or designee and shall be Ebel r•1 171 accompanied by a descriptive cover letter. The cover letter shall contain, but not be limited to, the following: a. Project Name. b. Location of Project. c. Type of utility construction proposed. d. Estimated number of water and sewer users to be served by the proposed construction. e. Explanation of what action the County is being requested to take regarding the materials submitted. f. List of documents attached. g. Engineer's Report - A concise report summarizing the proposed construction including connections, phasing, assumptions and estimated flows. In the event the proposed construction is part of a proposed subdivision development and plat review process, applicant shall additionally follow, unless set forth otherwise, herein, the "Development Requirements" procedures set forth in LDC, as may be amended. LDC references to Ordinance 88 -76 shall for all purposes be deemed references to this Ordinance. The County requires complete data and information with this initial submission in order to efficiently provide the necessary review. For this reason, a "standard transmittal" form will not be acceptable for the initial submission. However, transmittal forms may be utilized for the subsequent submittal of revised documents, additional items requested by the County and other information pertinent to the review and approval process. 8.2.4 Schedule of Fees and Charges. The Board shall establish by Resolution, a Schedule of Fees and Charges for construction document processing, inspection services and sales. The Schedule shall be posted in the Division of Community Development and Environmental Services. The Resolution shall be filed with the Clerk to the Board. The Schedule may be changed from time to time, pursuant to standard resolution adoption and amendment procedures. The Construction Document Review Fee shall be submitted with the construction document submission. The Construction Document Review Resubmission Fee shall be required if County's review requires a third review, in addition to the initial review and one resubmission. The resubmission fee shall be submitted at the time the third submission is made. The Construction Inspection Fee shall be submitted prior to the final construction plan approval. The Construction Document Modification fee shall be submitted upon written request by the County prior to final approval of the modifications requested. The Developer shall be responsible for the payment of all fees identified above. 8.2.5 Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimate. The Engineer of Record shall furnish three (3) complete sets of the construction drawings and two (2) sets of the technical specifications or, as otherwise required by the LDC. Construction drawings shall be prepared on standard size 24" x 36" sheets. Technical specifications shall be typewritten on 8 -1/2" x 11" sheets and bound in an M 171 acceptable manner. Technical specifications shall include an estimate of probable construction cost, prepared by the Engineer of Record, which contains a summary of quantities and estimate of installed cost for the water and/or wastewater facilities proposed for construction. The cost estimate shall be prepared by the Engineer of Record and submitted in itemized form to include the cost of all required improvements or the contract bid price for all work necessary to complete the required improvements. Incorporation of technical specifications into the construction drawings, in lieu of a separate set of written specifications as described above, shall not be acceptable, unless written waiver is granted by the Public Utilities Administrator or his designee. The construction documents shall be submitted to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for review and written approval prior to the commencement of construction. The construction documents shall consist of, but not be limited to: a) Cover Sheet with Location Map b) Site Utility Master Plan, indicating the overall site development and all proposed utility improvements including easements, with references to the appropriate plan and profile sheets. If phasing of the project is proposed, phases shall be indicated on this drawing. For proposed points of connection to existing water and/or wastewater facilities, the site utility plan shall indicate the method and materials to be used. Actual location of existing sewer mains or laterals and water lines stubs shall be shown, where applicable c) Identification of individual lots for subdivisions and/or buildings and structures for condominiums, multi - family projects, etc.; d) For all projects, except single - family subdivisions, the proposed meter location to service each structure shall be illustrated (final meter sizes shall be determined by the Collier County customer service representative.) For preliminary meter sizing, see impact fee Ordinance, as amended, superseded or consolidated. e) All existing utility easements on the particular property shall be shown on the drawings. Proposed easements may be required to be shown if the site working space is confined, as determined by County on a case-by-case basis. Easements required to be shown, shall be clearly labeled and shall show the width and limits. See Section 10.2.1- 2. f) Plan and profile sheets shall indicate the horizontal and vertical locations for all water and/or wastewater improvements, including all appurtenances, as well as, other proposed and/or existing facilities, together with all conflicts in the same general location. Special profile sheets shall be required when unique situations or complex conflicts occur that cannot be clearly detailed on standard plan and profile forms. Profiles shall be positioned on the sheet directly below the plan section they are illustrating, with the exception of utilities, that will not be owned and maintained by Collier County. For such utilities that are not owned and maintained by Collier County, profiles shall be provided, but do not have to be positioned on the sheet directly below the plan section. 171 g) Water and/or wastewater standard details. Use of the technical standards contained in the COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY STANDARDS TECHNICAI. MANUAL shall be required for all construction projects. Pavement restoration, backfill standards, compaction requirements, etc., regarding work within the public rights -o €way or CUE shall be governed by the rules and regulations established by the Public Utilities Division. Standard details involving these items shall reflect the requirements of the Public Utilities Division h) Complete Lift Station drawings, specifications, as required, and details including shop drawings, when necessary, shall be submitted. A special site plan of the lift station and appurtenances shall be provided. It shall contain specific details on the configuration of the station, location of appurtenances, such as electric service and transformers, guard posts, control panel, fencing, landscaping, etc., and the proposed location with respect to roadways, sidewalks or bike paths, driveways and proposed or existing rights -of -way or utility easements. i) Water and wastewater system hydraulic calculations. j) Construction plans shall include a symbols and abbreviations legend. k) A list of all County inspections that require 48 notice. 1) A statement as to who owns and maintains the onsite water and sewer systems. 8.2.6. Ordinance 80 -112. When connection to a central wastewater system, other than those operated and maintained by the County or an appropriate Water -Sewer District, is proposed, the requirements of County Ordinance No. 80-112 and amendments or successor Ordinance thereto shall be satisfied and shall comply with Sec. 7.1 herein: "Utility Service: Availability." 8.2.7 Rights -of -Way Permits. Construction within dedicated public rights -of -way shall require an approved permit from the appropriate governmental County, State and/or Federal agency. A copy of the approved permit shall be submitted, to the County, prior to the project pre - construction meeting. Utility construction within a right -of -way owned by the State of Florida, shall require a FDOT Utility Permit. When companion FDEP permit applications must be obtained, they will be released for processing prior to final FDOT permit approval, provided the construction documents are satisfactory to the Public Utilities Administrator. 8.3 Fire Control District Approval All construction drawings containing water distribution facilities shall be reviewed by and shall require written approval by the appropriate independent Fire Control Districts. Fire hydrant location design shall be in compliance with the LDC or NFPA Regulations, latest edition, whichever is more restrictive. The Fire Control District must provide the County with a letter approving the number and location of the fire protection facilities to serve the project. This letter shall contain an agreement by the Fire Control District to accept the ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the hydrants after construction is complete pursuant to the established policy of each individual Fire Control District on the effective date of this Ordinance. The Public Utilities Division will be responsible for the fire hydrant lead up to and including the gate valve as specified in the UTILITIES TECHNICAL MANUAL unless the 19 171 Fire Districts do not accept ownership of the fire hydrants and leads after the isolation valve in which case the entire lead and fire hydrant should be dedicated to the County. Upon completion of the water system construction, the Engineer of Record must provide to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator or designee, field fire - flow testing documentation that establishes that adequate fire#low capabilities exist. The Engineer of Record must incorporate demand capacity and meter sizing data into the construction drawings for those projects which utilize a master water meter, to which fire hydrants shall be connected, which establish that the water meter selected does pass the total flows required by the project. The County or appropriate Water -Sewer District shall not be responsible for, and/or shall be held harmless from any damages, or loss, resulting from inadequate sizing of a water meter to supply fire flow, in addition to domestic coincident drafts, for a particular project. Data on the meter sizing analysis shall also be contained in the hydraulic design report discussed in Paragraph 8.2.3(g). 8.4 Plats A copy of the proposed plat for new subdivisions that contain water and/or wastewater facilities shall be submitted with the construction drawings to the County for review and approval. All utility easements that will be required for the water and/or wastewater facilities shall be shown on the plat, if possible. Further, the dedication block on the cover sheet shall contain statements for the following: a) That all Utility Easements for water and/or wastewater facilities and Ingress and Egress rights, where appropriate, are provided to Collier County and the appropriate Water -Sewer District to install, operate and maintain water and/or wastewater utilty facilities within the Platted Area; and b) Applicable water and/or wastewater facilities constructed within this Platted Area shall be conveyed to the Board for the appropriate Water -Sewer District upon acceptance of the improvements required by the Plat. All plats shall include a signature block for the Board, (or where appropriate, the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District). Final approval of construction documents for a project will not be made until the Board pursuant to the LDC requirements has duly approved the proposed plat. Plats submitted and approved by the Board shall be in complete accordance with this Ordinance. Any requests for deviations from this Ordinance shall be clearly outlined in the executive summary, with a copy sent to the affected Department(s). Deviations approved as part of the plat shall not be valid unless clearly outlined in the applicant's submittal letter. If a plat is not required for a specific project, the Engineer of Record shall provide documentation confirming that fact so that the County can determine the extent of utility easements that must be provided. ME 8.5 Utilities Performance Security The Developer shall be required to furnish a utilities performance security ( "UPS ") in an amount equal to 110% of the Engineer's Probably Cost of Construction for Water and/or Wastewater Facilities. The Developer shall submit the UPS with the final construction documents; the UPS must be approved by the Collier County Attorney's Office prior to commencement of utility construction. A UPS is not required for the construction phase of a project, provided development is occurring on private, un- subdivided property, or if the UPS has been previously provided to the County, pursuant to the LDC requirements. The UPS shall be required on all projects during the guarantee or warranty period as described herein. Upon conveyance of utility facilities to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County as the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida, and Ex- Officio the Governing Board for the appropriate Water -Sewer Districts, the Developer may request a reduction in the UPS in an amount equal to ten percent (10 %) of the probable cost of utility construction for the required guarantee or warranty period. For completion of facilities constructed on private, un- subdivided property, a ten percent (10 %) UPS must be provided to, and accepted by, the County prior to preliminary acceptance of the completed utility facilities. Whenever reasonably possible, the UPS amount shall be based on the actual bid price of the water and/or wastewater facilities. Whenever a bid price is utilized, a copy of the accepted bidders proposal form must be submitted with the UPS. The UPS shall be held by the County and shall secure and cover the performance of the Developer in construction and maintaining the subject water and/or wastewater improvements. Acceptable types of UPSs shall be a Performance Bond, a Cash Bond or an irrevocable Letter of Credit. No other form of security will be accepted unless a waiver of the requirements herein is granted by the Board. All surety companies associated with a performance Bond shall hold a current Certificate of Authority, as issued by the Treasury Department, as an acceptable surety on federal bonds under an Act of Congress approved July 30, 1947. Attorneys -in -fact who sign a Performance Bond must file with the Bond a certified copy of their Power of Attorney Certificate. The Bond must either be signed, or countersigned by a Florida resident agent. The surety shall be directly responsible to the County, should the bond have to be utilized to complete any repairs or work on the project. The issuer of any Letter of Credit shall be a federally insured and regulated savings and loan association or commercial bank, authorized to do and doing business in the State of Florida. Any Letter of Credit must be irrevocable and address both the construction and maintenance obligations of the Developer in a form acceptable to the Collier County Attorney. The beneficiary of any Letter of Credit shall be the Board. The beneficiary of a Letter of Credit provided as a UPS shall be entitled to draw on the Letter of Credit if: 1) the Developer has failed to construct or maintain the subject water and/or wastewater improvements; or 2) if the Letter of Credit is scheduled to expire prior to final inspection, as described in paragraph 10.3 hereof, and alternative performance security has not been provided and accepted in accordance with this Ordinance within three (3) business days prior to the expiration date. A final inspection of the subject water and/or wastewater facilities shall be conducted prior to release of a UPS. All construction and maintenance obligations covered by a UPS shall be guaranteed and maintained by the Developer until satisfactory completion of the final inspection. To 21 0 171 8.5 Utilities Performance Security The Developer shall be required to furnish a utilities performance security ( "UPS ") in an amount equal to 110% of the Engineer's Probably Cost of Construction for Water and/or Wastewater Facilities. The Developer shall submit the UPS with the final construction documents; the UPS must be approved by the Collier County Attorney's Office prior to commencement of utility construction. A UPS is not required for the construction phase of a project, provided development is occurring on private, un- subdivided property, or if the UPS has been previously provided to the County, pursuant to the LDC requirements. The UPS shall be required on all projects during the guarantee or warranty period as described herein. Upon conveyance of utility facilities to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County as the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida, and Ex- Officio the Governing Board for the appropriate Water -Sewer Districts, the Developer may request a reduction in the UPS in an amount equal to ten percent (10 %) of the probable cost of utility construction for the required guarantee or warranty period. For completion of facilities constructed on private, un- subdivided property, a ten percent (10 %) UPS must be provided to, and accepted by, the County prior to preliminary acceptance of the completed utility facilities. Whenever reasonably possible, the UPS amount shall be based on the actual bid price of the water and/or wastewater facilities. Whenever a bid price is utilized, a copy of the accepted bidders proposal form must be submitted with the UPS. The UPS shall be held by the County and shall secure and cover the performance of the Developer in construction and maintaining the subject water and/or wastewater improvements. Acceptable types of UPSs shall be a Performance Bond, a Cash Bond or an irrevocable Letter of Credit. No other form of security will be accepted unless a waiver of the requirements herein is granted by the Board. All surety companies associated with a performance Bond shall hold a current Certificate of Authority, as issued by the Treasury Department, as an acceptable surety on federal bonds under an Act of Congress approved July 30, 1947. Attorneys -in -fact who sign a Performance Bond must file with the Bond a certified copy of their Power of Attorney Certificate. The Bond must either be signed, or countersigned by a Florida resident agent. The surety shall be directly responsible to the County, should the bond have to be utilized to complete any repairs or work on the project. The issuer of any Letter of Credit shall be a federally insured and regulated savings and loan association or commercial bank, authorized to do and doing business in the State of Florida. Any Letter of Credit must be irrevocable and address both the construction and maintenance obligations of the Developer in a form acceptable to the Collier County Attorney. The beneficiary of any Letter of Credit shall be the Board. The beneficiary of a Letter of Credit provided as a UPS shall be entitled to draw on the Letter of Credit if: 1) the Developer has failed to construct or maintain the subject water and/or wastewater improvements; or 2) if the Letter of Credit is scheduled to expire prior to final inspection, as described in paragraph 10.3 hereof, and alternative performance security has not been provided and accepted in accordance with this Ordinance within three (3) business days prior to the expiration date. A final inspection of the subject water and/or wastewater facilities shall be conducted prior to release of a UPS. All construction and maintenance obligations covered by a UPS shall be guaranteed and maintained by the Developer until satisfactory completion of the final inspection. To 21 schedule the final inspection, the County shall provide written notice to the Engineer of Record, if practicable, approximately thirty (30) days prior to the completion of the one -year period from the facilities acceptance by the County. The representatives of the County, Engineer of Record, Contractor, and Developer shall conduct final inspection. The UPS shall remain, at all times, in full force and effect until the county provides written notification that the final inspection has been satisfactorily completed. Upon such written notification, the County shall return and release the UPS to the Project Engineer or the Developer's designated agent. 8.6 Construction Commencement Water and/or wastewater facilities construction shall commence only after receipt of the following: 1. (a) Final written approval of the construction documents, or (b) Preliminary Work Authorization (PWA) approval as outlined in LDC. 2. FDEP construction permits for the water and/or wastewater systems. 3. Any other permit that may be required for water and/or wastewater construction, including, but not limited to, a SFWMD ERP or MSW, ACOE Dredge -Fill, NPDES, FDOT, etc. 4. Pre- construction meeting as outlined in Section 9.2. 8.7 Construction Document Modification The County prior to construction must approve all modifications to County- approved construction documents. The Engineer of Record shall submit a Construction Document Modification including a written technical description of all modifications, the review fee, and the revised construction drawings to the County for written approval prior to construction. SECTION NINE: CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND INSPECTION 9.1 General Installation of all water and/or wastewater facilities and/or connections to existing utility facilities within the County shall be observed and inspected by qualified professional and technical personnel. Construction observation and inspection is required to ensure that the facilities accepted by the Board have been installed in substantial accordance with the County - approved construction drawings and technical specifications. Construction observation and inspection is further necessary to ensure that the County and the water and/or wastewater Districts shall receive utility facilities that require minimum capital expenditure for operation and maintenance. 9.2 Pre - Construction Meeting Upon County approval of a project's construction documents and prior to the commencement of construction, a pre - construction meeting shall be conducted, pursuant to the LDC. The pre- 22 171 schedule the final inspection, the County shall provide written notice to the Engineer of Record, if practicable, approximately thirty (30) days prior to the completion of the one -year period from the facilities acceptance by the County. The representatives of the County, Engineer of Record, Contractor, and Developer shall conduct final inspection. The UPS shall remain, at all times, in full force and effect until the county provides written notification that the final inspection has been satisfactorily completed. Upon such written notification, the County shall return and release the UPS to the Project Engineer or the Developer's designated agent. 8.6 Construction Commencement Water and/or wastewater facilities construction shall commence only after receipt of the following: 1. (a) Final written approval of the construction documents, or (b) Preliminary Work Authorization (PWA) approval as outlined in LDC. 2. FDEP construction permits for the water and/or wastewater systems. 3. Any other permit that may be required for water and/or wastewater construction, including, but not limited to, a SFWMD ERP or MSW, ACOE Dredge -Fill, NPDES, FDOT, etc. 4. Pre- construction meeting as outlined in Section 9.2. 8.7 Construction Document Modification The County prior to construction must approve all modifications to County- approved construction documents. The Engineer of Record shall submit a Construction Document Modification including a written technical description of all modifications, the review fee, and the revised construction drawings to the County for written approval prior to construction. SECTION NINE: CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION AND INSPECTION 9.1 General Installation of all water and/or wastewater facilities and/or connections to existing utility facilities within the County shall be observed and inspected by qualified professional and technical personnel. Construction observation and inspection is required to ensure that the facilities accepted by the Board have been installed in substantial accordance with the County - approved construction drawings and technical specifications. Construction observation and inspection is further necessary to ensure that the County and the water and/or wastewater Districts shall receive utility facilities that require minimum capital expenditure for operation and maintenance. 9.2 Pre - Construction Meeting Upon County approval of a project's construction documents and prior to the commencement of construction, a pre - construction meeting shall be conducted, pursuant to the LDC. The pre- 22 ' 171 m construction meeting shall be held in the offices of the County or, if deemed appropriate, at the office of the Engineer of Record. Representatives of the County, the Applicants, the Engineer of Record, the Utility Companies, the Contractor and the Developer shall attend the pre - construction meeting, where necessary. At the pre - construction meeting, a schedule of construction activities and copies of all applicable state and federal permits shall be provided to the County representative(s). At least 48 hours written notice shall be provided for scheduling the pre - construction meeting with the County. Should any utilities construction commence prior to the pre - construction meeting, the County shall have the right to require partial or full exposure of all completed work for observation, inspection and verification that the utilities were installed in substantial accordance with the approved construction documents and technical specifications. 9.3 Construction Scheduling All water and/or wastewater facilities construction in right -of -way areas including pressure testing and sewer lamping shall be completed in substantial accordance with the approved construction plans and technical specifications prior to proceeding with the stabilization of the roadway subgrade. Installation of improvements, that would complicate corrective work on the water and/or wastewater facilities, shall be considered in scheduling all adjoining or related phases of the construction. The County shall be notified within 24 hours, with written follow - up, of any problems and/or conflicts with the construction of required improvements as they affect the completion of the proposed facilities in substantial accordance with the approved construction plans and technical specifications. Failure to comply with this regulation shall constitute just cause for the issuance of a Stop Work Order by the County; and the County shall have the right to require partial or full exposure of any related work which has been completed in order to observe, inspect, and verify that the utilities were installed in substantial accordance with the approved construction plans and technical specifications. 9.4 Construction Observation and Inspection 9.4.1 General Pursuant to the F.A.C., Chapters 17-6 and 17 -22, the construction of water and/or wastewater facilities requires a Professional Engineer ( "P.E. ") to certify the construction was completed in substantial accordance with the approved construction plans and technical specifications. The certification must be based upon on -site observation of construction; therefore, all water and/or wastewater facilities construction shall require on-site construction observation complying with the LDC and F.A.C., Chapters 17- 6.140(5)3 and 17- 22.108(6)4, as may be amended. The construction observation shall be performed by a P.E. licensed to practice in the State of Florida or a designated technical representative under the P.E.'s direction. The P.E.'s certification of construction compliance with County- approved construction documents, verifies that the water and/or wastewater facilities are constructed in compliance with Record Drawings. Reference Section 10: Utilities Conveyance Procedures. 9.4.2 Construction Inspections by County Upon final approval of construction documents by the County, the Engineer of Record will be provided with a list of standard inspections that require the presence of a County representative. 23 0 All required inspections shall be identified in the County's approval letter for the project. Based upon the scheduling and progress of construction, the Engineer of Record or applicant's contractor shall be responsible for requesting County inspections. Written requests for inspections shall be provided to the County at least 48 hours prior to the requested inspection to allow scheduling of the County Inspector. Verbal confirmation of the inspection time or a request to reschedule the inspection during the County inspection, the Engineer of Record or his/her designated representative will be available on -site. Routine County inspections will be carried out without notice on all water and/or wastewater facilities construction to ensure compliance with the approved construction documents. In the event the County Inspector, or an employee of the Public Utilities Division, during an on�site inspection, find construction in progress which does not comply with the procedures and policies contained herein and/or the approved construction documents, the County Inspector, or employee of the Public Utilities Division shall have full authority to issue a Stop Work Order. Such Stop Work Order shall remain in full force and effect, with respect to the defective work, until the documented discrepancies have been corrected and to the full satisfaction of the Public Utilities Division. Construction- related inspections, where applicable, shall include, but not be limited, to the following: a) Hot taps to water and sewer facilities.* b) Master meter and bypass piping. c) Jack & Bore casings. d) Pressure tests.* e) Infiltration/Exfiltration tests. f) Lift station installation, prior to cover -up and start-up. g) Lift station start-up.* h) Lamping of sewer lines. i) Flushing of sewer lines, force mains, water mains and effluent lines.* j) Television video taping of sewer lines at end of construction and the warranty period ( "in- office review "). k) Fire hydrant thrust blocks. 1) Conflict box construction.* m) Connections to existing water and sewer facilities.* n) Casing installations. o) Other special requirements as specified by the County at the time of construction document approval. The County must be present at the inspections noted with " *" above. M 9.4.3 Preliminary Inspections A preliminary inspection of the completed facilities is required prior to any conveyance to and acceptance by the Board. During this inspection, the utilities will be checked for compliance with the approved construction drawings and/or approved revised construction drawings. All facilities must be in full compliance with the County- approved record construction drawings, or County- approved revised construction drawings, prior to conveyance to the Board for acceptance. Reference Section 10: Utilities Conveyance Procedures. 9.4.4 Final Inspections The final inspection shall be conducted no earlier than one (1) year after acceptance and conveyance of the utility facilities by the Board. During this inspection, the utility facilities shall be examined for any defect in materials and workmanship and for physical and operational compliance with the County- approved record construction drawings. The UPS shall remain in effect until the final inspection has been satisfactorily completed and the Developer is so notified in writing. Reference Section 10: Utilities Conveyance Procedures. SECTION TEN: UTILITIES CONVEYANCE PROCEDURES 10.1 General Water and/or wastewater facilities, constructed pursuant to the standards and procedures established herein shall be conveyed to and accepted by the Board. Preliminary acceptance shall be approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator or designee. Final acceptance shall be approved by the Board after the one (1) year warranty period and the Final Inspection. 10.1.1 Water Line Acceptance 1. Board shall accept for ownership and operation potable water systems with pipes six inches (6) or greater in diameter, including the water meter and/or backflow device with the exception of internal potable water distribution (PWD) systems The for such facilities as rental apartments, shopping centers, strip malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile home parks or any other multi - family projects that cannot or do not provide the required CUES paralleling a typical single family street cross-section or any other project that does not comply with or meet the intention of this Ordinance. 2. Gravity Sewer Line Acceptance. The Board shall accept for ownership and operation gravity wastewater collection systems with pipes eight inches (8 ") or greater in diameter with the exception of internal gravity wastewater collection systems for such facilities as rental apartments, shopping centers, strip malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile homes parks or any other multi - family projects with gravity wastewater collection systems that cannot or do not provide the required CUEs paralleling a typical single family street cross - section. The gravity wastewater collection system shall lie within a CUE if it is to be owned and operated by the Board. The minimum acceptable as -built slope shall 25 171 not be more than 10% below the allowable slope or 10% less than the design slope. See Section 17- 6.140(a)2, Florida Administrative Code, for details. All non - potable reuse irrigation water systems not currently owned by or required to be owned by the District shall be owned and maintained, in their entirety by the applicant, his successors or assigns, from the connection valve from the County Master Meter at the entrance to the project. 10.1.2 Gravity Sewer Line Acceptance. The Board shall accept for ownership and operation gravity wastewater collection systems with pipes eight inches (8 ") or greater in diameter with the exception of internal gravity wastewater collection systems for such facilities as rental apartments, shopping centers, strip malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile homes parks or any other multi - family projects with gravity wastewater collection systems that cannot or do not provide the required CUES paralleling a typical single family street cross - section. The gravity wastewater collection system shall lie within a CUE if it is to be owned and operated by the Board. 10.1.3 Lift Station and Force Main Acceptance. The Board shall accept for ownership and operation wastewater collection systems including force mains with pipes four inches (4 ") or greater in diameter and lift stations with the exception of internal wastewater collection systems for such facilities as rental apartments, shopping centers, strip malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile homes parks or any other multi - family projects with gravity wastewater collection systems that cannot or do not provide the required CUES paralleling a typical single family street cross - section. The wastewater collection system shall lie within a CUE if it is to be owned and operated by the Board. Telemetry may be required for private lift stations. All other internal wastewater collection systems shall be owned, operated and maintainedby a master property owner's association or comparable private ownership. 10.2 Conveyance Documents At the time of the County's final approval of construction documents, County shall provide Developer with County's checklist of the conveyance documents required for submission at the time the constructed facilities are dedicated to County. All conveyance documents, including but not limited to, Deeds, Bills of Sale, Affidavits, Easements, Facilities Agreements, Facilities Leases, Subordination by Lien Holders or Mortgages, Master Condominium/Homeowner's Association documents, Irrevocable Standby Letters of Credit, and UPSs, shall be in a form acceptable to the Collier County Attorney. A schedule of standard legal documents forms, approved by the County Attorney, shall be utilized as a guide for the preparation of the conveyance documents. This schedule is located within Appendix A and B. Revisions to these forms must be reviewed and approved by the County Attorney. All documents shall be submitted to County for review and written approval and prior to acceptance of the utility facilities and commencement of service. Recording of all documents shall be made by the County only after written acceptance by the Community Development and 26 171 Environmental Services Administrator or designee. All documents recorded hereafter, which do not follow this procedure, shall be returned as unacceptable. For projects which the water and/or wastewater facilities are not being conveyed to the Board, the final association documents shall contain a disclaimer stating: "The onsite water and/or wastewater facilities are to be owned and maintained by the Master Condominium/Homeowner's Association" (or other comparable private ownership). 10.3 Inspection County requires a preliminary and final inspection of all water and wastewater facilities constructed. The construction of all water and/or wastewater facilities must be observed and certified by the Engineer of Record and be inspected by the County. The nature and extent of the construction observation and inspection is detailed in Section 9.4. 10.4 Record Construction Drawings The record construction drawings shall accurately depict the constructed configuration of the water and wastewater facilities to be conveyed to the Board. All revisions to the approved construction drawings shall be precisely identified and illustrated on the record construction drawings. The following items shall be accurately depicted on the record construction drawings: a) Sewer system inverts, pipe slopes, manhole rim elevations and run lengths. A negative ( -) 10% sewer slope deviation from design slope is considered a substantial deviation and will not be accepted. See Section 17- 6.140(a)2, Florida Administrative Code, for details. b) Sewer lateral locations stationed from the nearest downstream manhole. c) Sewer main stub extension inverts at both ends, pipe slope, run length and location. d) Tie -ins and/or stationing location to all valves, air release assemblies, fire hydrants, manholes, blowoffs, etc. e) Location and dimensional ties to lift station electrical services and transformer. All record construction drawings of utility facilities that are not being conveyed to the Board for a particular Water -Sewer District shall bear a prominently displayed DISCLAIMER, in bold lettering at least 1/4 inch high, stating: "The on -site water and/or wastewater facilities are to be owned and maintained by the project developer and/or the master condominium/homeowners' association," or other comparable private ownership. Five (5) sets of signed and sealed record construction drawings for the water and/or wastewater facilities to be conveyed shall be submitted to County. When water and wastewater facilities are being conveyed, seven (7) sets of signed and sealed record construction drawings shall be submitted to County. Each sheet of the record construction drawings shall identify the entity that provided the record data. Record drawings shall be provided magnetically in ACAD14 or later version. 27 • 171 10.5 Bacterial Analysis Pursuant to FDEP requirements and regulations, bacterial analyses are required for all potable water transmission and distribution facilities to be constructed. Bacteriological samples for new water facilities construction shall be performed during or after preliminary acceptance of the facilities. All such analysis shall be performed only by the Water Department laboratory and, at no cost to County, with test results submitted within 15 days of being placed in service for transmission lines and 30 days of being placed in service for distribution lines. The Public Utilities Division will not process meter installations and the Certificates of Occupancy until satisfactory bacterial tests are submitted and the Division receives the FDEP placement in service approval. The Developer shall be responsible for coordinating all aspects for the submission of all necessary test results and State approvals for placement in service of the water facilities. 10.6 Final Costs The Developer or Engineer of Record shall submit a detailed schedule of the materials utilized for the utility facilities construction. This schedule shall include the type of items, quantities utilized, unit cost and total cost for each individual item utilized in the water and/or wastewater facilities construction. The total cost of all items utilized for the water and/or wastewater facilities shall be clearly shown on the schedule. Costs shall be tabled separately for County Owned and Privately Owned infrastructure. 10.7 Test Results All test data, i.e., pressure, inflow and infiltration, fire flow capacity, etc., required for submission with the conveyance documents shall be certified by an Engineer licensed to practice in the State of Florida. Certification shall bear the raised seal and an original signature of the engineer. Each certification shall contain computations illustrating the allowable limits for each test based on current accepted test standards and the actual field test data obtained. Leakage within water systems and sewage force main systems shall comply with AWWA Standards. Sewer system infiltration /exfiltration data shall conform to a standard of 50 gallons /inch of diameter /mile /day for all types of pipe and conform to procedures in the UTILITIES TECHNICAL MANUAL Fire flow capacity within the water distribution system must be verified through field- testing to demonstrate that required fire flow rates are available. Fire flow testing shall be accomplished during peak flow hours. 10.8 Lift Station Submittals A copy of the manufacturer's startup report for each facility shall be provided. Included with these items shall be a written verification from the electrical contractor for the lift station verifying the wire type and size for the electric service and certifying that the voltage drop across the service under full loan startup will not exceed 5% of the power company's line voltage at the transformer supplying the station. All tools, such as access cover lock handles, valve wrenches, keys or panel locks, required for the ready access and use of the facilities shall also be submitted with the documents. J 10.9 Recordation Fees The Developer of a project will be responsible for the payment of all recordation fees associated with the utilities conveyance procedures. The Public Utilities Division or designee shall invoice and the Developer shall remit the total amount of the recording fee associated with recording the conveyance documents prior to the final acceptance of the water and/or wastewater facilities. SECTION ELEVEN. THIS SECTION IS BY OPERATION OF THIS ORDINANCE HEREAFTER INCLUDED IN THE COLLIER UTILITIES TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL: SECTION TWELVE: THIS SECTION IS BY OPERATION OF THIS ORDINANCE HEREAFTER INCLUDED IN THE COLLIER UTILITIES TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL. SECTION THIRTEEN: AMENDMENTS County may recommend amendments to this Ordinance as may be necessary upon prior review by the Utility Code Sub - committee of the Development Services Advisory Committee, by the Public Utilities Administrator on technical matters and, in case of conflicts with the LDC, upon the additional prior review by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. Revisions shall be made annually to the "Collier Utilities Technical Standards Manual' by the Public Utility Administrator to reflect best engineering practices, technology advances, compliance with other agencies, and public input. These revisions shall also be reviewed by the parties listed above. SECTION FOURTEEN: PENALTY Section 6.1 of the Collier Code of Ordinances applies to this Ordinance, In addition, any person who violates any section or provision of this Ordinance shall be prosecuted and punished as provided by Section 125.69, Florida Statutes. Each day the violation continues shall constitute a separate offense. Additionally, the Board may bring suit for damages, to restrain, enjoin or otherwise prevent the violation of this Ordinance in the Circuit Court of Collier County. This Ordinance may also be enforced by Collier County Code Enforcement Boards. SECTION FIFTEEN: REPEAL OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17, No. 98 -53 and No. 2000 -59 are hereby repealed and superseded in their entirety. The following Collier County Resolutions are also repealed: Resolutions Nos. CWS No. 97 -2, MWS No. 97 -2, and GWD No. 97 -2. SECTION SIXTEEN: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "Ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION SEVENTEEN: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY The provisions of this Ordinance shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purposes in the interest of public health, safety, welfare, and convenience. If any section, phrase, sentence w:7 s 171 or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. SECTION EIGHTEEN: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon being filed with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, As the Governing Body of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, the Marco Water and Sewer District and the Goodland Water District, this Jj 0 day of t00—Tp IB E R- , 2001. IrtlllIli„ GHT'E: BKOCK CLERK ; � d Deputy lerlZ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF 'Aft t as : o tr*W S COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING SWitl0e�;;aa"► 7 • BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF-JUE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICTi',, THE MARCO WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT AND TNE: � ... ; w GOODLAND WATER DISTR) &h I0 -rd Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By:_ n V Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney APPENDIX A, B, AND C FOLLOW ON FOLLOWING PAGES: JAMES DARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN Kill APPENDIX A — STANDARD LEGAL DOCUMENTS INSTRUCTIONS do 171 1 The following forms are to be used as a guide to preparers of instruments which shall be submitted to the Board for acceptance of water and/or wastewater utility facilities. Adherence to the form and instructions contained below will assure an expeditious review by the Collier County Attorney's Office, which in turn will speed the process of utility facilities acceptance by the Board. Deviation in substance or form from the suggested specimen forms may result in a substantial delay or disapproval of the utility facilities acceptance documents by the County Attorney's Office. PLEASE CAREFULLY READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE PREPARING INSTRUMENTS INSTRUCTION NO. 1. Each specimen form is prepared in a manner that indicates to the preparer the location and the type of information that needs to be inserted. This is indicated by [brackets which contain instructions]. Most bracketed information is self - explanatory. However, where an in -depth instruction of the type of information to be inserted is appropriate, the bracketed information gives a brief explanation followed by a reference to an instruction. That instruction correlates to the following instructions. INSTRUCTION NO. 2. Name of grantor/ mortgagee /developer/lessee /owner /surety/issuer/ applicant (hereinafter collectively referred to for the purposes of this instruction as "grantor "). If grantor is an individual, insert the grantor's name followed by the grantor's marital status. If the grantor is married, the grantor's spouse must join in any conveyance instrument. As an alternative to having a grantor's spouse join in a conveyance instrument, a paragraph can be added below the reference to Exhibit "A" which says: "The subject lands are not homestead lands." If the grantor is a corporate entity, show the correct name of the corporation and identify the state or other jurisdiction in which it is incorporated. If the grantor is a partnership entity, show correct name of the partnership, identify whether the partnership is a general or limited partnership, and identify the state or other jurisdiction under which the partnership was created and presently operates. If the grantor is a trust insert the trustees name, as trustee. If appropriate (Section 689.071, Florida Statutes), identify the trust and recite the authority of the trustee to convey. Your attention is directed to Chapter 689, Florida Statutes. INSTRUCTION NO. 3. Witness and signature block. All instruments, unless otherwise noted thereon, require two (2) witnesses. Example witness and signature blocks are as follows: 31 17I Execution by an individual: S/ An individual First Witness - Signature First Witness — Print or Type Name Second Witness - Signature Witness — Print or Type Name Execution by a Corporation: XYZ Corporation, Inc., a Florida Corporation By: (L.S.) Note: (L.S.) is effective as the Corporate Name, [ President] or [Vice- President] Seal. First Witness - Signature First Witness — Print or Type Name Second Witness - Signature Second Witness — Print or Type Name NOTE: In lieu of using two individual witnesses, a corporation may execute these instruments by having the President's or the Vice - President's signature witnessed by the Corporation's Secretary (a Corporate Officer) and by affixing the Corporation's seal. Sections 692.01 and 692.02, Florida Statutes. A hand written or imprinted scrawl, scroll or seal, affixed as the corporate seal below the corporate officer's signature is an effective seal. Section 695.07, Florida Statutes. XYZ Corporation, Inc., a Florida Corporation Name, Title (Corporate Seal) [The corporate seal can either be by simply typing the words "Corporate seal" OR by printing or stamping the words "Corporate seal" on the page under the President's or a Vice - President's signature. RM Witness: 174I By: John R Smith, Corporate Secretary * The Corporate Secretary is effectively the same as two individual witnesses. Execution by a partnership with an individual acting as its general partner: ABC Partnership By: [Name], as the General Partner Execution by a partnership with an entity acting as its general partner: ABC, a Florida Partnership By XYZ Corporation, Inc., a corporate General Partner acting on behalf of the Partnership By: S/ Name, President [or Vice - President] First Witness - Signature First Witness — Print or Type Name Second Witness - Signature Witness — Print or Type Name Execution by Section 689.070, Florida Statutes, Trustee: S/ [Name], as Trustee First Witness - Signature First Witness — Print or Type Name It Second Witness - Signature Witness — Print or Type Name Execution by Section 689.071, Florida Statutes, Trustee: By: Sally Springfield, as Trustee of the above referenced Trust 33 171 First Witness - Signature First Witness — Print or Type Name Second Witness - Signature Second Witness — Print or Type Name INSTRUCTION NO. 4. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTARY BLOCK. The following forms of acknowledgment and notary block are sufficient. For execution by one individual: State of County of The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by who is personally known OR who produced identification . Type of identification produced: (Affix notary seal) S/ Notary Public Notary [Typed of Printed Name (or stamp)] My Commission Expires: For Execution by a Corporation: State of County of The foregoing document was acknowledged before me by [insert the name of person signing], [corporate title must be either President, Vice President or Chief Executive Officer [unless an appropriate corporate resolution is attached and which specifically authorizes the respective execution by some other corporate officer] of [insert the name of the corporation], a [insert the State of incorporation] corporation, on behalf of the corporation, who is personally known OR who produced identification. Type of identification produced: Vv=SS my hand and official seal this Notary Public My Commission Expires: day of $20 (Affix notary seal or stamp) Notary's Typed or Printed Name [if not in Notary stamp] 34 171 For execution by a partnership by a general partner who is an individual: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing document was acknowledged before me by [name of individual who signed], general partner, on behalf of the partnership, a [insert name of state or jurisdiction under whose laws the partnership was formed and operates] [identify the type of partnership] partnership. Personally known OR who Produced identification_. Type of identification produced WIINESS my hand and official seal this S/ Notary Public Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires: day of , 20 For execution by a partnership whose general partner is an entity: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing document was acknowledged before me by [name of person signing], [corporate title, must be either President, Vice President or Chief Executive Officer [unless an appropriate corporate resolution is attached which specifically authorizes execution by some other corporate officer] of [exact name of corporation], a [State of incorporation], as the corporate entity general partner, on behalf of [insert exact name of partnership], a [insert name of state or jurisdiction under whose laws the partnership was formed and presently operates] [identify type of partnership]. Personally known or Produced identification _. Type of identification produced WITNESS my hand and official seal this Notary Public day of , 20_ (Affix notary seal) Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires: For an execution by a Section 689.070, Florida Statutes, Trustee: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing document was acknowledged before me by [insert exact name of person signing ], individually, and as Trustee. Personally known OR Produced identification _. Type of identification produced WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of 20_ (Affix notary seal) 35 171 Notary Public Notary Printed Name My Commission Expires: For an execution by an individual as a Section 689.071, Florida Statutes, Trustee: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing document was acknowledged before me by [insert exact name of person signing], as Trustee on behalf of the above - referenced Trust. Personally known OR Produced identification _. Type of identification produced WITNESS my hand and official seal this Notary Public Notary Printed or Typed Name day of (Affix notary seal) My Conunission Expires: 20_ For execution by a corporation as a Section 689.071, Florida Statutes, Trustee: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing document was acknowledged before me by [name of person signing who must be either the President, a Vice President or the Chief Executive Officer, OR an appropriate corporate resolution must be attached to prove that the person signing is authorized to sign on behalf of the corporation as Trustee of the above referenced Trust.. Personally known or Produced identification _. Type of identification produced WITNESS my hand and official seal this Notary Public Notary Printed or Typed Name day of , 20_ (Affix notary seal) My Commission Expires: INSTRUCTION NO. S. Exhibits attached to all instruments must describe the real property that encompasses the subject utility facilities or easement. Language on the legal description Exhibit that alters or qualifies the instrument to which it is attached is unacceptable. INSTRUCTION NO. 6. For the purposes of simplicity and brevity, references in this Appendix and Collier County Ordinance No. 97- , as amended, to the Collier County Water -Sewer District shall also be construed to refer to the Marco Water and Sewer District or the Goodland Water District, where appropriate and as the context requires. Preparers of legal documents are cautioned to determine to which District their documents should run before preparing and submitting documents. INSTRUCTION NO. 7. Notarization of an oath. The proper notarization of an oath (or affirmation) is as follows: "SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of 36 0 IV 171 , 20_." An acknowledgment is not acceptable for any affidavit (Subsection 117.05(13), Florida Statutes. The affiant must both swear to the document in the presence of the Not and sign the document in the presence of the Notary. INSTRUCTION NO. 8. This Appendix is provided as a guide to preparers and is not intended to be all- inclusive. All documents will be reviewed on an individual basis. If the preparer is unsure of the required form or content of any document, he or she should seek professional advice or assistance prior to preparing and submitting the document for acceptance. Form 1 - Rev. 10 /01 (Facilities Agreement) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 *[Identify type of treatment facility by inserting either water or sewer in title of this instrument] * FACILITIES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this [day] day of [month], [year], by and between [Name of developer - see Instruction No. 2] (hereinafter referred to as "Developer "), and THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as "County "). Developer is used as singular or plural, as the context requires. RECITALS: WHEREAS, for the purposes of this Agreement the term "Developer" shall include the Developer, the Developer's heirs, successors, and assigns, including but not limited to any wholly owned or controlled subsidiary entity who leases back any utility facilities from the County; and WHEREAS, the Developer is the Owner of the [insert name of project shown below referenced construction plans] development, (hereinafter "Project ") and has submitted construction plans for an interim [identify type of treatment facility by inserting water or sewer] treatment facility (hereinafter "interim treatment facility ") to the County for review and approval; and WHEREAS, the Developer acknowledges and agrees that the Developer is required to provide on -site interim utility facilities which service the Project until the utility facilities within the Project can be connected to the off -site utility facilities operated by the County and the County facilities have the available capacity to service the Project; and WHEREAS, Collier County land development regulations require, and Developer covenants and agrees, that the Developer shall connect any interim, utility system serving that Project to the off -site utility system operated by the County when the County's system has been extended to within two hundred (200) feet of the Project and the available off -site utility system has available capacity to service the entire Project; and 37 171 WHEREAS, the extension of the off -site utility system operated by the County to within two hundred (200) feet of the boundary of the Project shall be not required of the County as performance under this Agreement; and WHEREAS, all parties to this Agreement acknowledge and agree that the decision as to whether or not any off -site utility system operated by the County has the capacity to service the Project shall be made solely by the County; and WHEREAS, the Developer acknowledges its obligation to dedicate all appropriate collection, distribution and transmission facilities and appropriate easements to the County prior to placing said facilities into service; and WHEREAS, the Developer, or other successor entity satisfactory to the County, will maintain and operate the interim treatment facility and the associated on -site collection, distribution and transmission plant pursuant to a lease agreement with the County as set forth herein below; and WHEREAS, the developer has previously accepted the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement as part of the County's review and approval of the Developer's land use petitions. WITNESSETH: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants hereinafter contained the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS INCORPORATED. The above Recitals are true and correct and shall be incorporated herein. 2. INTERIM FACILITY. The appropriate on -site treatment, collection, distribution and transmission facilities are to be constructed as part of the proposed Project and shall be an interim facility; all utility facilities shall be constructed to State and Federal standards and are to be owned. operated and maintained by the Developer or other successor entity satisfactory to the County until such time as the County's off -site utility facilities are available to service the project. The interim treatment facilities shall supply services only to the Project or, subject to the County's approval, other lands owned by the Developer. The interim treatment facilities may not provide service outside the Project without the written consent of the County. 3. DEVELOPER TO DISMANTLE INTERIM TREATMENT FACILITY. Upon connection to the County's off -site utility facilities the Developer shall abandon, dismantle and remove from the site the interim treatment facility. All work related with this activity shall be performed at no cost to the County whatsoever in accordance with FDEP standards. 4. CONNECTION TO COUNTY'S OFF -SITE SYSTEM AT NO COST TO COUNTY. The Developer at no cost to the COUNTY will make connection to the County's off-site utility facilities to the County within ninety (90) days after such facilities become available. The cost of connection shall include, whenever the County requires, but not be limited to, all engineering design and preparation of construction documents, permitting, modification or refitting of existing pumping facilities, construction of new pumping facilities, interconnection with County off -site utility facilities, any transmission, distribution or collection lines necessary to 171 '. ­ make the connection and any required environmental audits, including the expense of bringing the subject facilities into compliance and response costs for cleanup removal or remediation. 5. CONVEYANCE OF INTERIM TREATMENT FACILITIES NEEDED FOR CONNECTION AND OPERATION OF COUNTY'S OFF -SITE SYSTEM. At the time the County's off -site facilities are available for the Project to connect, all utility facilities required by the County to make the connection with the County's off -site utility facilities shall be conveyed to the County pursuant to County ordinances and regulations then in effect, together with all utility easements required by the County. All construction plans and technical specifications related to the connection of the County's off -site utility facilities shall be submitted to the County for review and approval prior to commencement of construction. COUNTY at its option may require conveyance of facilities internal to the project. 6. CUSTOMER TURNOVER. All customers served on an interim basis by the utility system constructed by the Developer shall become customers of the County at the time when the County's off -site sewer facilities are available to serve the Project and such connection is made. Prior to connection of the interim utility system serving the Project to the County's offsite utility facilities, the Developer shall turn over to the County a complete list of customers served by the interim utility system and shall not compete in any way with the County for the service of those customers. The Developer shall also provide the County with a detailed inventory of the facilities served within the Project and cooperate fully in the transfer of any billing procedures. 7. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES TO BE PAID PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. The Developer agrees to pay all applicable system development charges at the time that Building Permits are required, pursuant to County Ordinances and Regulations then in effect. This requirement shall be made known to all prospective buyers of properties for which building permits will be required. 8. LEASEBACK OF DEDICATED FACILITIES. The County and the Developer shall enter into a leaseback of the collection, distribution and transmission facilities to the Developer, or other utility entity satisfactory to the County, to allow for continued operation of the interim utility system. Such a leaseback shall be upon terms comparable to utility facilities lease agreements then entered into by the County as required by and in accordance with applicable County land development regulations and/or utility standards and procedures. Any such lease agreement shall be in a form approved by the Office of the Collier County Attorney. 9. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall be binding upon the parties, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. [Developer's witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] 39 0 171 '.. ATTEST: Clerk By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT I01YA , Chairman [Developer's acknowledgment and notary block - see Instruction No. 4] Form 2 - Rev. 10/01 (Performance Bond) Utilities Acceptance Documents -Doc. 320 UTILITIES PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: that [Insert name of Owner - See Instruction No. 2] [Insert current business address of Owner] (hereinafter referred to as "Owner ", and [Insert name of Surety - See Instruction No. 2] [Insert current business address of Surety] (hereinafter referred to as "Surety "), are held and firmly bound unto Collier County, Florida, (hereinafter called "County "), in the total aggregate penal sum of [insert written dollar amount] Dollars $[insert numeric dollar amount] in lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. Owner and Surety are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Owner entered into a certain Utilities Facilities Construction Contract, dated the [day] day of [month], 20[year], a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS the County has a material interest in the performance of said Contract; and WHEREAS the County has adopted Ordinances and Resolutions (hereinafter "Land Development Regulations ") concerning the Owner's obligations to the County regarding the construction, conveyance and warranty of water and sewer facilities constructed within the unincorporated area of Collier County; NOW, THEREFORE, if the Owner shall well, truly and faithfully perform its obligations and duties to the County under said Land Development Regulations and all the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions, and agreements of said contract during the original term thereof, and any extensions thereof which may be granted by the Owner, with or without notice to the Surety and during the guaranty period established by the County, and thereafter, and if the Owner shall satisfy all claims and demands incurred under such contract, and shall fully indemnify and save harmless the County from all costs and damages which it may suffer by t 171 '- reason of failure to do so, and shall reimburse and repay the County all outlay and expense which the County may incur in making good any default, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that the said Surety, for value received hereby, stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to work to be performed there under or the specifications accompanying same shall in any way affect its obligation on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the contract or to the work or to the specifications. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that it is expressly agreed that the bond shall be deemed amended automatically and immediately, without formal and separate amendments hereto, upon amendment to the Contract not increasing the contract price more than 20 percent, so as to bind the Owner and the Surety to the full and faithful performance of the contract as so amended. The term "Amendment ", wherever used in this bond, and whether referring to this bond, the Contract or other documents shall include any alteration, addition or modification of any character whatsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Instrument to be executed this day of 920 [Owner's witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Surety's witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Notary and acknowledgment blocks for both Owner and Surety required - See Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] Form 3 - Rev. 10 /01 - (Letter of Credit) Utilities Acceptance Documents - Doc. #320 IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. [Insert issuer's identifying number] ISSUER: [insert full name and street address of Issuer] (hereinafter "Issuer ") PLACE AND DATE OF ISSUE: [insert address where credit is issued and date of issue]. PLACE OF EXPIRY: At Issuer's counters located at _ . [ONLY In Collier County] DATE OF EXPIRY: This Credit shall be valid until [insert date of first anniversary of date of issue], and shall thereafter be automatically renewed for successive one -year periods on the anniversary of its issue unless at least sixty (60) days prior to any such anniversary date, the Issuer notifies the Beneficiary in writing by registered mail that the Issuer elects mt to so renew this Credit. APPLICANT: [insert full name of person or entity - see Instruction No. 21 (hereinafter "Applicant ") [insert Applicant's current business address]. 41 BENEFICIARY: The Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida (hereinafter "Beneficiary") Collier County Courthouse Complex, Naples, Florida, 34112. AMOUNT: $[insert dollar amount] (U.S.) up to an aggregate thereof. CREDIT AVAILABLE WITH: Issuer. BY: Payment against documents detailed herein and Beneficiary's drafts at sightdrawn on the Issuer. DOCUMENTS REQUIRED: AVAILABLE BY BENEFICIARY'S DRAFT(S) AT SIGHT DRAWN ON THE ISSUER AND ACCOMPANIED BY BENEFICIARY'S STATEMENT PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY THE COUNTY MANAGER, CERTIFYING THAT: "[insert name of Applicant] has failed to construct and/or maintain the [identify type of improvements by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] improvements as shown on the plans for [insert exact name or title of project shown on construction plans], or a final inspection satisfactory to Collier County, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17, as amended, has not been performed prior to the date of expiry, and satisfactory alternative performance security has not been provided to and formally accepted by the Beneficiary". DRAFT(S) DRAWN UNDER THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MUST BE MARKED: "Drawn under [insert name of Issuer] Credit No. [insert Issuer's number identifying this letter of credit], dated [insert original date of issue] ". The original letter of credit and all amendments, if any, must be presented for proper endorsement. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full the terms of the Issuer's undertaking and such undertaking shall not in any way be modified, amended, or amplified by reference to any documents, instrument, or agreement referenced to herein or in which this letter of credit relates, and any such reference shall not be deemed to incorporate herein by reference any document, instrument or agreement. Issuer hereby engages with Beneficiary that draft(s) drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this credit will be duly honored by Issuer if presented within the validity of this credit. This credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits [1993 (or later generally applicable) Revision] International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 500 [or later Publication No.]. [Name of Issuer] Lo {Insert title of corporate officer - must be signed President, Vice President, or Chief Executive Officer] NOTE: Collier County shall not accept any Letters of Credit that cannot be presented in Florida. Form 4 - Rev. 10 /01 (Utilities Facilities Subordination Consent and Joinder) Utilities Acceptance —Doc #320 Leave 3" space blank space in upper right hand corner for recording purposes UTILITY FACILITIES SUBORDINATION, CONSENT AND JOINDER THIS SUBORDINATION, CONSENT AND JOINDER given this [day] day of [month], [year], by [Name of Secured Party - see Instruction No. 2] W 171 (Hereinafter referred to as "Secured Party "), in favor of the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, its successors and assigns, (hereinafter referred to as "County "). Secured Party is used as singular or plural, as the context requires. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Secured Party is the owner and holder of that certain [insert the exact name of each instrument to be subordinated] recorded in Official Records Book , Page [insert the Official Records Book and first page reference for each instrument to be subordinated] et seq of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as "Securing Instrument(s) "), encumbering the premises legally described therein, (hereinafter referred to as the "Encumbered Property"). WHEREAS, County has requested and received from the fee simple owner of the Encumbered Property non - exclusive easements for the installation, relocation and/or maintenance of utility facilities over, under and/or across a portion of the encumbered premises legally described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by virtue of this reference, which premises are hereinafter referred to as the 'Basement Property". WHEREAS, County has requested that Secured Party consent to, join in and subordinate its Securing Instrument(s) to the interest that County has in the Easement Property to which request Mortgagee has agreed. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Secured Party does hereby consent to, join in and subordinate the lien of its securi to the grant of that certain easement described herein over, under, and across the Easement Property and any interest of the County in any utility facilities located therein, thereon, or affixed thereto. Except as subordinated to the easement described herein over, under, and across the Easement Property or any utility facilities located therein or affixed thereto, said security interest shall remain otherwise in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Secured Party has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Acknowledgment and notary block - see Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] W Form 5 - Rev. 10 /01 - (Attorney's Affidavit) Utilities Acceptance - Doc #320 ATTORNEY'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF COUNTY OF 171 BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personal! on this day of , 20 , personally appeared , who is to me is well known, and having been sworn and under oath, deposes and states: 1. My name is , I am over the age of twenty -one (21) years, am otherwise sui juris, and have personal knowledge of the facts asserted herein. 2. I am a licensed attorney authorized to practice law in Florida and am currently practicing law in the State of Florida. My Florida Bar Number is is address .. My business address My business telephone number is My business mailing 3. This Affidavit is given as an inducement to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the governing body of Collier County and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District to accept the dedication or conveyance of [identify type of utility facility by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities located within or upon the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A ", which is incorporated herein by reference, said land being located in Collier County, Florida. 4. The Affiant has examined record title information to both the real and personal property referenced in this affidavit, including but not limited to, information requested from the Florida Secretary of State relative to any Uniform Commercial Code financing statements. 5. The record owner of the real property described herein is [give full legal name of owner as it appears in title information; if owner is an entity make reference to the laws of the state or jurisdiction under which entity was created and presently operates] (hereinafter "Owner "). The Owner acquired record title to the subject real property by instrument recorded at Official Records Book , at Page [insert official record book and first page of instrument where owner acquired title], Public Records, Collier County, Florida (copy attached) [If the record owner is an entity, the Affiant must indicate that he has examined corporate or partnership information obtained from the jurisdiction under which the entity was created and presently operates, that the entity is current and active within said State or jurisdiction, that the entity is currently authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and identify the exact name and title of the persons authorized to execute the instruments on behalf of the entity in conjunction with the conveyance of the subject real and personal property.] 44 171 [Pursuant to Section 689.071, Florida Statutes if the record owner is a trustee, the Affiant shall state that the Trustee has full power and authority to execute instruments of conveyance on behalf of the Trust and, if applicable, incorporate by reference and attach supporting documentation.] [If the record owner is an individual, the Affiant must state the marital status represented to the Affiant by the individual and, if married, state whether or not the individual has represented the subject real property is homestead property.] 6. The Affiant shall state whether the subject real and personal property is encumbered of record, or is the subject of any mortgage or other financing statement(s) that encumber title to the Utility Facilities being conveyed and/or easement filed in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida or the Office of the Secretary of State. If the subject real or personal property is encumbered the Affiant shall specifically describe each lien, encumbrance or financing statement, citing appropriate recording information and the Affiant shall attach and incorporate by reference a copy of each lien, encumbrance, or financing statement. Note: [Every item listed in paragraph 6 of the Affidavit must be subordinated. Do not list any items that does not encumber title to either the utility facilities or any easement being conveyed. 7. Affiant further states that the information contained in this Affidavit is true, correct and current as of the date this Affidavit is given. [INFORMATIONAL NOTE: Per Ordinance the date of this Affidavit must not be signed and dated more than sixty (60) days prior to the meeting at which the Board of County Commissioners considers the acceptance of the subject utility facility documents.] FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. DATED this day of , 20 Affiant Signature Affiant Printed Name [No witnesses required] [Notary block] - SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of ,20 by (Insert name of person taking the oath), who is personally known OR produced identification Type of Identification Produced Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed of Typed Name Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] 45 Form 6 -Rev. 10/01 (Owners Affidavit) Utilities Acceptance - Doc #320 OWNERS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared who to me is well known, and having been duly sworn and under oath, deposes and states: 1. My name is , I am over the age of twenty -one (21) years, am sui juris, and have personal knowledge of the facts asserted herein. 2. I am the owner of said real property located at described on Exhibit "A ". and legally 3. All persons, firms, and corporations, including the general contractor, all subcontractors and sub - subcontractors, materialmen and suppliers who have furnished services, labor or materials according to plans and specifications, or extra items, used in the construction or repair of [identify type of utility facility by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities on the real estate hereinafter described, have been paid in full and that such work has been fully completed and unconditionally accepted by the owner. 4. No claims have been made to the Owner, nor is any suit now pending on behalf of any contractor, subcontractor, sub - subcontractor, supplier, laborer or materialmen, and no chattel mortgages or conditional bills of sale have been given or are now outstanding as to the subject utility facilities placed upon or installed in or on the aforesaid premises. 5. The utility facilities described herein are not included in, encumbered by, or subject to any real property mortgage, chattel mortgage, security agreement, Uniform Commercial Code financing statement, or any other encumbrance that might affect marketable title to the subject utility facilities and/or easement(s). 6. As and on behalf of the owner of the subject utility facilities, does for valuable consideration hereby agree and guarantee, to hold the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the governing body of Collier County and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District harmless against any lien, claim or suit by any general contractor, subcontractor, sub - subcontractor, supplier, mechanic or materialman, and against chattel mortgages, security interests or repair of the subject utility facilities by or on belalf of Owner. Affiant is used as singular or plural, as the context requires. M • 17I3 . ;,� Form 6 -Rev. 10/01 (Owners Affidavit) Utilities Acceptance - Doc #320 OWNERS AFFIDAVIT STATE OF COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared who to me is well known, and having been duly sworn and under oath, deposes and states: 1. My name is , I am over the age of twenty -one (21) years, am sui juris, and have personal knowledge of the facts asserted herein. 2. I am the owner of said real property located at described on Exhibit "A ". and legally 3. All persons, firms, and corporations, including the general contractor, all subcontractors and sub - subcontractors, materialmen and suppliers who have furnished services, labor or materials according to plans and specifications, or extra items, used in the construction or repair of [identify type of utility facility by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities on the real estate hereinafter described, have been paid in full and that such work has been fully completed and unconditionally accepted by the owner. 4. No claims have been made to the Owner, nor is any suit now pending on behalf of any contractor, subcontractor, sub - subcontractor, supplier, laborer or materialmen, and no chattel mortgages or conditional bills of sale have been given or are now outstanding as to the subject utility facilities placed upon or installed in or on the aforesaid premises. 5. The utility facilities described herein are not included in, encumbered by, or subject to any real property mortgage, chattel mortgage, security agreement, Uniform Commercial Code financing statement, or any other encumbrance that might affect marketable title to the subject utility facilities and/or easement(s). 6. As and on behalf of the owner of the subject utility facilities, does for valuable consideration hereby agree and guarantee, to hold the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the governing body of Collier County and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District harmless against any lien, claim or suit by any general contractor, subcontractor, sub - subcontractor, supplier, mechanic or materialman, and against chattel mortgages, security interests or repair of the subject utility facilities by or on belalf of Owner. Affiant is used as singular or plural, as the context requires. M 171 ; r The utility facilities referred to herein are located within the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A ". FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. DATED this day of Affiant Signature Printed Name [No witnesses required] [Notary block] - SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of S/ 20_, by (Insert name of person taking the oath), Personally known OR produced identification Type of Identification Produced Notary Public Notary Printed or Typed Name My Commission Expires: Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] Form 7 -Rev. 10 /01 (Utility Easement) Utilities Acceptance —Doc #320 Leave 3" blank space in upper right hand corner for recording purposes UTILITY EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, granted this [day] day of [month], 20 [year], by [Name of Grantor - see Instruction No. 2] as Grantor, to the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, its successors and assigns, as Grantee. WITNESSETH: That the Grantor for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the Grantee, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, non - exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install, relocate and/or maintain utility facilities, in, on, over and under the following described lands being located in Collier County, Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee and its assigns, together with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, relocate and/or take materials for the purpose of constructing, 47 operating, relocating and/or maintaining the subject utility facilities thereon. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Witnesses and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Acknowledgment and notary block - see Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] Form 8 - Rev. 10 /01 (Warranty Deed and Bill of Sale) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 Leave 3" blank space in upper right hand corner for recording purposes UTILITY FACILITIES WARRANTY DEED AND BILL OF SALE THIS INDENTURE made this [day] day of [month], 20[year], between [Name of Grantor - see Instruction No. 2] (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor "), and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, its successors and assigns, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee "). WITNESSETH: That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever, all [identify type of utility facilities by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities lying within the following described land, together with appurtenant easement rights for the operation, relocation, installation and maintenance of said facilities, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to wit: (See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.) and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said utility facilities, be they realty, personalty, or mixed, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. For the purposes of this conveyance, the utility facilities conveyed herein shall not be deemed to convey any of the lands described in Exhibit "A ". Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as context requires. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee and its assigns, together with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, relocate and/or take materials for the purpose of constructing, relocating, operating, and maintaining utility facilities thereon. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. .• s 17 I .. N #t operating, relocating and/or maintaining the subject utility facilities thereon. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Witnesses and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Acknowledgment and notary block - see Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] Form 8 - Rev. 10 /01 (Warranty Deed and Bill of Sale) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 Leave 3" blank space in upper right hand corner for recording purposes UTILITY FACILITIES WARRANTY DEED AND BILL OF SALE THIS INDENTURE made this [day] day of [month], 20[year], between [Name of Grantor - see Instruction No. 2] (hereinafter referred to as "Grantor "), and the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, its successors and assigns, (hereinafter referred to as "Grantee "). WITNESSETH: That said Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration to said Grantor in hand paid by said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee, and Grantee's heirs, successors and assigns forever, all [identify type of utility facilities by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities lying within the following described land, together with appurtenant easement rights for the operation, relocation, installation and maintenance of said facilities, situate, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to wit: (See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein.) and said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said utility facilities, be they realty, personalty, or mixed, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. For the purposes of this conveyance, the utility facilities conveyed herein shall not be deemed to convey any of the lands described in Exhibit "A ". Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as context requires. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee and its assigns, together with the right to enter upon said land, excavate, relocate and/or take materials for the purpose of constructing, relocating, operating, and maintaining utility facilities thereon. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. .• v 171 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Witness and signature block - see Instruction No. 3] [Acknowledgment and notary block - see Instruction No. 4] Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] [NOTE: The 'BILL OF SALE" can be been dispensed with, it is not needed if the combination Deed and Bill of Sale is used.] Form 10 - Rev. 10 /01 - (FACILITIES LEASE) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 Leave 3" blank space in upper right hand corner for recording purposes * [Identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer in the title of this instrument] * FACILITIES LEASE THIS LEASE, executed this [day] day of [month], by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessor ") and [Name of Lessee - see Instruction No. 2] (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessee "). RECITALS: WHEREAS, [identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer] utility facilities lying in the lands described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference were conveyed to Lessor by Lessee, and the Lessor is now the owner of said facilities; and WHEREAS, the Lessee is the owner of a [identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer] treatment plant and has agreed to provide service to the [insert name of project] development (hereinafter "Project ") until such time as the Lessor desires to provide treatment by means of the Lessors treatment facilities; and WHEREAS, the Lessee needs to have possession and use of the facilities described in Exhibit "A" for so long as it is obligated to provide interim treatment service to the Project. WITNESSETH: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration exchanged among each of the parties, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, the parties agree as follows: .• Of 171 1. RECITALS INCORPORATED. The above recitals are true and correct and shall be incorporated herein. 2. LEASED PROPERTY. The Lessor shall lease to the Lessee all of the utility facilities described herein and located on the lands described in Exhibit "A ". 3. TERM. The term of the lease shall be ten (10) years. At the end of ten (10) years, the lease shall be automatically renewed for successive five (5) year terms, unless terminated by either party as herein provided. 4. RENT. The Lessee shall pay the Lessor the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per year as rent under this Agreement. Rent shall be paid upon submission of a statementby the Lessor to the Lessee, and shall be paid yearly at the offices of the Utility Department of the Lessor. 5. TERMINATION. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Agreement, the parties agree that this lease shall terminate at such time as the Lessor undertakes to provide the treatment service for the Project. 6. OPERATION OF TREATMENT FACILITY. During the period of this lease, the Lessee agrees that it or a wholly owned subsidiary shall provide treatment services to the Project, provided all initial connection fees and user rates are paid. The Lessee further agrees that so long as it provides such services, it will charge utility rates approved and regulated by the State of Florida Public Service Commission. 7. STANDARD OF MAINTENANCE. Lessee shall maintain all utility facilities, including but not limited to, all transmission, collection, distribution and treatment facilities, at standards equal to the maintenance standards for comparable utility facilities maintained by the Lessor. 8. FACILITIES TO BE IN GOOD WORKING ORDER UPON CONNECTION TO OFF -SITE SYSTEM. Lessee shall be solely responsible to have all utility facilities subject to this Agreement in good working order and in compliance with all County, State, and Federal requirements when the facilities are conveyed to the Lessor and are connected to the Lessors off -site utility facilities. At no cost to the Lessor, Lessee shall conduct and provide to the Lessor an environmental audit, together with a written declaration from an environmental consultant acceptable to the Lessor, which verifies that the facilities subject to this Agreement are in compliance with all applicable State and Federal environmental laws, and that the facilities and property surrounding the facilities are free of unlawful contamination. The environmental consultant shall demonstrate its qualifications to the satisfaction of the Lessor prior to commencing the environmental audit. Its qualification shall be presumptively established if the project manager is a professional engineer who is registered and in good standing with the State of Florida, or a certified environmental professional by the National Association of Environmental Professionals or some other like national professional organization. The Lessors acceptance of the environmental consultant shall not be unreasonably withheld. At least ninety (90) days prior to the connection of the interim utility system to the Lessor's offsite utility system, the Lessor shall notify the Lessee to commence the environmental audit. The failure of the Lessor to give timely notice to the Lessee or acceptance by the Lessor of any interim utility system in the absence of receipt of the negative declaration, shall not relieve the Lessee of any 50 r 17I obligation hereunder for the cost of conducting the environmental audit, bringing the subject facilities into compliance and the response costs for clean -up, removal and remediation, if any, which shall be borne solely by the Lessee. 9. INSURANCE. Until such time as the interim utility system serving the Project is connected to the off -site utility facilities operated by the Lessor, Lessee shall provide and pay for all property damage and liability insurance for the entire utility system servicing the Project, including, but not limited to, flood damage insurance for any lift, eductor or pump station facilities. Lessee shall provide the Lessor upon each renewal of the required insurance policies or inclusion of additional facilities under this Agreement, with a Certificate of Insurance evidencing coverage for the full replacement value of the entire utility system which services the Project, and showing the Lessor as an additional insured for any interim utility facilities ultimately necessary for connection to and operation of the Lessors off -site utility system. 10. GUARANTEE BY LESSEE. The Lessee shall have the sole responsibility for repairing and/or replacement of defective materials and guaranteeing all facilities covered by this Agreement for a period of approximately one year from date of preliminary acceptance by Lessor. Further, at the end of the guarantee period it shall be the sole responsibility of Lessee to prepare all facilities for final inspection by the Lessor at no expense to the Lessor. 11. BINDING EFFECT. This Lease shall be binding upon all of the parties to this Lease, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Lessee's witness and signature block - See Instruction No. 3] ATTEST: [Name, CLERK] By: Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT Lota Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney Chairman [ADD Lessees acknowledgment and notary block - See Instruction No. 4] STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER ) 51 171 I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared well known to me to be the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, As The Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of The Collier County Water -Sewer District, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing [insert exact name of instrument] for the purposes therein contained under authority duly invested by the Board of County Commissioners, and that the seal affixed hereto is the true seal of said Board. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of ,2001 S/ Notary Public (Notarial Seal) My Commission Expires: Printed or Typed Name of Notary (if not on stamp) Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] Form 11 - Rev. 10 /01 - (Facilities Lease including Sub - Developer) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 Leave 3" blank space for in upper right hand corner for recording purposes * [Identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer in the title of this instrument] * FACILITIES LEASE THIS LEASE, executed this [day] day of [month], 43[year], by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY, AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessor ") and [Name of Lessee - see Instruction No. 2] (hereinafter referred to as the "Lessee "), and[Name of Developer - see Instruction No. 2] (hereinafter referred to as "Developer "). RECITALS: WHEREAS, [identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer] utility facilities lying in the lands described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference were constructed and installed by Developer, and thereafter conveyed to Lessor by Developer, and the Lessor is now the owner of said facilities; and WHEREAS, the Lessee is the owner of a [identify the type of utility facilities to be leased by inserting water or sewer] treatment plant and has agreed to provide service to the [insert name of project] development (hereinafter "Project ") until such time as the Lessor desires to provide treatment by means of the Lessors treatment facilities; and 52 171 'a WHEREAS, the Lessee needs to have possession and use of the facilities described in Exhibit "A" for so long as it is obligated to provide interim treatment service to the Project. WITNESSETH: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration exchanged among each of the parties, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, the parties agree as follows: 1. RECITALS INCORPORATED. The above recitals are true and correct and shall be incorporated herein. 2. LEASED PROPERTY. The Lessor shall lease to the Lessee all of the utility facilities described herein and located on the lands described in Exhibit "A ". 3. TERM. The term of the lease shall be ten (10) years. At the end of ten (10) years, the lease shall be automatically renewed for successive Eve (5) year terms, unless terminated by either party as herein provided. 4. RENT. The Lessee shall pay the Lessor the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per year as rent under this Agreement. Rent shall be paid upon submission of a statement by the Lessor to the Lessee, and shall be paid yearly at the offices of the Utility Department of the Lessor. 5. TERMINATION. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Agreement, the parties agree that this lease shall terminate at such time as the Lessor undertakes to provide the treatment service for the Project. 6. OPERATION OF TREATMENT FACILITY. During the period of this lease, the Lessee agrees that it or a wholly owned subsidiary shall provide treatment services to the Project, provided all initial connection fees and user rates are paid. The Lessee further agrees that so long as it provides such services, it will charge utility rates approved and regulated by the State of Florida Public Service Commission. 7. STANDARD OF MAINTENANCE. Lessee shall maintain all utility facilities, including but not limited to, all transmission, collection, distribution and treatment facilities, at standards equal to the maintenance standards for comparable utility facilities maintained by the Lessor. 8. FACILITIES TO BE IN GOOD WORKING ORDER UPON CONNECTION TO OFF - SITE SYSTEM. Lessee shall be solely responsible to have all utility facilities subject to this Agreement in good working order and in compliance with all County, State, and Federal requirements when the facilities are conveyed to the Lessor and are connected to the Lessors off -site utility facilities. At no cost to the Lessor, Lessee shall conduct and provide to the Lessor an environmental audit, together with a written declaration from an environmental consultant acceptable to the Lessor, which verifies that the facilities subject to this Agreement are in compliance with all applicable State and Federal environmental laws, and that the facilities and property surrounding the facilities are free of unlawful contamination. The environmental consultant shall demonstrate its qualification to the satisfaction of the Lessor prior to IM] 1 171 commencing the environmental audit. Its qualification shall be presumptively established if the project manager is a professional engineer who is registered and in good standing with the State of Florida, or a certified environmental professional by the National Association of Environmental Professionals or some other like national professional organization. The Lessor's acceptance of the environmental consultant shall not be unreasonably withheld. At least ninety (90) days prior to the connection of the interim utility system to the Lessor's off site utility system, the Lessor shall notify the Lessee to commence the environmental audit. The failure of the Lessor to give timely notice to the Lessee or acceptance by the Lessor of any interim utility system in the absence of receipt of the negative declaration, shall not relieve the Lessee of any obligation hereunder for the cost of conducting the environmental audit, bringing the subject facilities into compliance and the response costs for clean -up, removal and remediation, if any, which shall be borne solely by the Lessee. 9. INSURANCE. Until such time as the interim utility system serving the Project is connected to the off -site utility facilities operated by the Lessor, Lessee shall provide and pay for all property damage and liability insurance for the entire utility system servicing the Project, including, but not limited to, flood damage insurance for any lift, eductor or pump station facilities. However, as between the Lessee and the Developer, it is agreed that the Developer shall reimburse the Lessee, upon demand, for any expenses associated with insuring the utility facilities subject to this lease. Lessee shall provide the Lessor upon each renewal of the required insurance policies or inclusion of additional facilities under this Agreement, with a Certificate of Insurance evidencing coverage for the full replacement value of the entire utility system which services the Project, and showing the Lessor as an additional insured for any interim utility facilities ultimately necessary for connection to and operation of the Lessors offsite utility system. 10. GUARANTEE BY DEVELOPER. The Developer shall have the responsibility for repairing and/or replacement of defective materials and guaranteeing all facilities covered by this Agreement for a period approximately of one year from date of preliminary acceptance by Lessor. Further, at the end of the guarantee period it shall be the responsibility of Developer to prepare all facilities for final inspection by the Lessor at no expense to the Lessor. 11. BINDING EFFECT. This Lease shall be binding upon all of the parties to this Lease, their successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. [Lessees witness and signature block - See Instruction No. 3] [Developers witness and signature block - See Instruction No. 3] [Lessees acknowledgment and notary block - See Instruction No. 4] [Developers acknowledgment and notary block - See Instruction No. 4] ATTEST: [Name, CLERK] By: Deputy Clerk 54 171 'a BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWER DISTRICT LIN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: Assistant County Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Chairman I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State and County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared , well known to me to be the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida, As The Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of The Collier County Water -Sewer District, being authorized so to do, executed the foregoing [insert exact name of instrument] for the purposes therein contained under authority duly invested by the Board of County Commissioners, and that the seal affixed thereto is the true seal of sail Board. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of ,20 S/ Notary Public (Notarial Seal) My Commission Expires: Typed or Printed Name of Notary if not on stamp Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] Form 12 - Rev. 10/0 1 (Final Attorney's Affidavit) Utilities Acceptance - Doc. #320 FINAL ATTORNEY'S AFFIDAVIT STATE OF COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally on this day of , 20 , appeared , who to me is well known, and having been sworn and under oath, deposes and states: 55 171 1. My name is . I am over the age of twenty -one (21) years, am otherwise sui juris, and have personal knowledge of the facts contained herein. 2. 1 am a licensed attorney, Florida Bar # , authorized to practice law in Florida and am practicing law in the State of Florida. My business address is My business telephone number is My business mailing address is 3. This Affidavit is given as an inducement to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, to conduct a final inspection of [identify type of utility facility by inserting water, or sewer, or water and sewer] utility facilities located within or upon the real property described in the attached Exhibit "A ", which is incorporated herein by reference, said land being located in Collier County, Florida. 4. The Affiant has examined record title information to both the real and personal property referenced in this affidavit, including but not limited to, information requested from the Florida Secretary of State relative to any Uniform Commercial Code financing statements. 5. The record owner of the utility facilities described herein is the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, as the Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (hereinafter "County "). The County acquired its record interest by [insert exact name of each instrument] recorded at Official Records Book , at page [insert official record book and first page of each instrument where owner acquired title] [if a utility easement was also acquired continue sentence and add: together with an appurtenant utility easement recorded at Official Records Book , page _� Public Records, Collier County, Florida (copies attached). 6. Subsequent to the time that the County recorded its interests in the subject utility facilities and, if applicable, easement, as specified in paragraph 3, above, no interest of the County in the subject utility facilities and, if applicable, easement, is encumbered of record by any document filed by or on behalf of the landowner (or predecessor in title to the underlying real estate in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, and/or the Office of the Secretary of State. 7. Affiant further states that the information contained in this Affidavit is true, correct and current as of the date of the recordation of the recorded docurpents referenced herein which conveyed or granted the subject utility facilities and/or easement interests to the County. [INFORMATIONAL NOTE: Per Ordinance the date of this Affidavit cannot be sieved and dated more than sixty (60) days prior to the meeting at which the Board of County Commissioners will consider its acceptance of the subject utility facility documents.) FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT. DATED this day of , 20 56 171 Affiant Signature Affiant Printed Name [No witness required] [Notary block] - SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of ,20_ by (insert name of person taking the oath), who is personally known OR produced identification . Type of identification produced S/ Notary Public My Commission Expires: Notary Printed or Types Name (if not on stamp) Prepared by: [name of person preparing this instrument] [Address of person preparing this instrument] APPENDIX B — CONVEYANCE DOCUMENT CHECKLIST CHECKLIST #1 WATER AND /OR WASTEWATER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE PROJECT Date Legal Documents 1. Utilities Performance Security (UPS) 2. Copy of Recorded Condominium/Homeowner's Association Documents 3. Utilities Facilities Subordination Consent and Joinder (Required for each mortgage and other Security Interest that affects title to the facilities being conveyed is involved). UCC - 1's can be subordinated by a Subordination other than UCC -3 4. UCC -1 and/or UCC -3 Forms (if not covered by Item 3) above 5. Attorney's Affidavit 6. Owner's Affidavit 7. Utility Easement and Copy of the Grantor's Deed for the Associated Real Property 8. Warranty Deed and Bill of Sale 9. I.D. Number or Folio Number of Property 10. Facilities Lease when applicable 11. Facilities Lease (including Sub - Developer) use form 10.1 12. Final Release of Lien from Utility Contractor for the Facility(ies) constructed. 57 4 171 13. Legal Description, if Utility Easements required, with Surveyor's Sketch of Easement. Submit four (4) signed and sealed copies of each easement. Easements not required if all facilities are installed in existing CUE'S. 14. Two (2) Copies of Recorded Plat 15. Engineer's Final Payment Confirmation. CHECKLIST #2 WATER AND /OR WASTEWATER FACILITIES ACCEPTANCE Tests, Certifications and Supplemental Documents 1. Certification of pressure testing of water mains by Engineer of Record. 2. Certification of pressure testing of sewer force mains by Engineer of Record. 3. Certification of the inflow /infiltration tests for the sewer lines by Engineer of Record. 4. Bacteriological clearance (DER Certification) for water facilities and DER placement in service letter for sewer facilities and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities, where necessary. 5. Lab results on bacteriological test for water mains. 6. Up -to -date list of customers and/or owners of individual lots. 7. Letter by Engineer certifying that all water and/or sewer facilities are located within the public right -of -way or dedicated easements. 8. Payment of water usage, laboratory and administrative charges for filling and flushing and bacteriologically certifying water mains from invoice prepared by the Utilities Division. (Obtain payment data from Utilities Division Finance Department) 9. Electrical Contractor's certification on Lift Station electric service wire sizing and voltage drop pursuant to National Electrical Code Specifications 10. One -year (1) warranty for work from Utility Contractor 11. Videotape of gravity sewer facilities constructed 12. Certification of field fire flow capacity testing by the Engineer of Record 13. Letter from Fire District regarding ownership and maintenance of fire hydrants 14. Lift station(s) startup report(s) 15. Letter from Compliance Services Section certifying that the Final Inspection reveals that the Utility Facilities have been constructed in accordance with County Ordinances and regulations 16. Test and certification of backflow device by the Collier County Cross Connection Control Section, Collier County Utility Division prior to placement of device in service. 171 17. Coating certification from the manufacturer or a professional testing laboratory for the manholes, wetwells and dry wells. CHECKLIST #3 WATER AND /OR WASTEWATER FACILITIES ACCEPT. Engineering Documents 1. Five (5) complete sets to include all utilities and all related underground work signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record for water OR sewer facilities 2. Seven (7) complete sets to include all utilities and all related underground work signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record for water AND sewer facilities. 3. One (1) set of reproducible mylars of record drawings. 4. Verification of final cost (detailed; quantities, sizes, unit cost, total cost, etc.) 5. For all computer generated construction documents, one (1) disk of the master site plan including CUES and water and/or wastewater facilities. The disk shall be in accordance with Utility Division's layer standards and file format. 6. Certification of completion, placement into service, and other documents required by regulatory agencies. APPENDIX C UTILITY DEVIATION FORM Please print and complete the Deviation Form and mail it to Joseph Cheatham, Wastewater Department, or Paul Mattausch, Water Department, at: Date: Site Development Plan Number (SDP#) Subdivision Improvement Number Name & Location of Project: 3301 Tamiami Trail East Building H, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 DEVIATION FORM Petitioners Request 59 Attach Plan or Drawing required required 171 Contact Name & Business Phone # Reason for request? How does this request differ from Ordinance? Impact of this request on affected area? Fax # Impact of this request on the maintenance of the Water/Wastewater systems? Explain benefits this request will have to the operation or maintenance of the Collier County Utility system: Additional Comments: .1 Routing: Water Distribution Supervisor(s) Water Director Wastewater Collections Supervisor Wastewater Director Approve Approve Approve Approve: Authorizing Signature: Collier County Water Director Authorizing Signature: Collier County Wastewater Director Copy to: Engineering Review & Inspections Public Utilities Administrator Wastewater Collections and Water Distribution 61 171 Date= Date= Disapprove: Disapprove: Disapprove: Disapprove: 171 STATE OF FLORIDA) I COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -57 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 23rd day of October, 2001, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 24th day of October, 2001. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and.,,c e. C c. v Ex- officio to County Commissioh s A.T rrl? By.Teri Michaels,% - -, Deputy Clerk //:l17111.f lililt`t COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Cleric to the Board: Please place the following as a: ® Normal legal Advertisement (Display Adv., location, etc.) ❑ Other: 17 1 17J Originating Dept/ Div: Transportation Operations/Trans Svcs Person: Marquita King Date: 9/19/01 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): N/A Petitioner: (Name & Address): N/A /2 ✓? O% Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (1f more space is needed, attach separate sheet) N/A Hearing before ® BCC ❑ BZA ❑ Other Requested Hearing date: (Based on advertisement appe ' 10 ys before hearing. Newspapers) to be used: (Complete only if important): ® Naples Daily News ❑ Other ® Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: An Ordinance repealing Collier County Ordinance No. 80 -45, The Retreat Unit One Street Lighting Municipal Service Taxing District (MSTU); providing for inclusion in Code of Laws and Ordinances; providing conflict and severability; providing an effective date. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: N/A Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? ❑ Yes ® No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 101- 163610- 649100 4, or Designee Date List Attachments: Executive Summary, Ordinance, Property Owner List DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ® County Manager agenda file: to ® Requesting Division Clerk's Office ® Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY- Date Received- 9Z2- Date of Public hearing: ' D L 0 _ Date Advertised: —� j 17J ORDINANCE NO. 2001 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 80 -45, THE RETREAT UNIT ONE STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING DISTRICT (MSTU); PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, The Retreat Unit One Street Lighting MSTU was created by Collier County per developer request in accordance with stipulations set forth in the Collier County Subdivision Regulations; and WHEREAS, the developer of The Retreat Unit One had street lighting installed within the subdivision after submitting the request to Collier County; and WHEREAS, neither the property owners individually nor The Retreat Homeowner's Association have shown any interest in having Collier County manage the street lighting system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: REPEAL THE RETREAT UNIT ONE STREET LIGHTING ORDINANCE NO. 80 -45 Collier County Ordinance No. 80 -45, which created The Retreat Unit One Street Lighting MSTU, is repealed in its entirety. SECTION TWO: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section ", "article ", or any other appropriate word. SECTION THREE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any court of competent jurisdiction holds any phrase or portion of the Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Secretary of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2001. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA i JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., Chairman 17J October 1, 2001 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider an Ordinance Repealing Ordinance 80 -45, The Retreat Unit One Street Lighting MSTU Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Friday, October 12, 2001 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman Deputy Clerk Enclosure Charge to: 101 - 163610- 649110 17J NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2001, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Harmon Turner Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE REPEALING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 80 -45, THE RETREAT UNIT ONE STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING DISTRICT (MSTU); PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 17J Ellie J. Hoffman To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: An Ordinance Repealing Ord. 80 -45 Hi Pam, Please advertise the above notice as indicated on the attached notice. Thanks, Ellie W W Repeal 80- 45.doc Repeal 80- 45.doc Ellie J. Hoffman 17J From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 2:33 PM To: Ellie J. Hoffman Subject: Delivered: An Ordinance Repealing Ord. 80 -45 I An Ordinance Repealing Ord. 80... «An Ordinance Repealing Ord. 80 -45» Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com' Subject: An Ordinance Repealing Ord. 80 -45 Sent: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:35:20 -0400 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Mon, 1 Oct 2001 14:33:06 -0400 1 0 >o Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHRIS HORTON PO BOX 4'13016 NAPLES FL 34101 -3016 REFERENCE: 001230 1011636106491 58330370 REPEAL ORD. 80 -45 NO State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared Phil Lewis, who on oath says that he serves as the Editor and vice President of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples in COLLier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 10112 AD SPACE: 103.000 INCH FILED ON: 10/1201 Signature of Affiant Sworn to and Subscribed before me this Personally known by me 01 day of 20� ei Nancy Evans _,. *- MY COMMISSION # CC849370 EXPIRES =A' July 18, 2003 ',;Q5 dti BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC the commence The title a Copw&__af,tW proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for InsPec- are Invitedeto attend andd be heard NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda Nem must regis- ter ni Istrraatora for to pro. pre- sentation aP the agenda Item to be addressed. In- divickml speakers will tx Ilrntted to S minutes on any Nern The selectlan of an Individual to speak on behalf of on organlzotlon r if rec pnlpzed by thee Chal man, a spokesperson for a group o organization may be ollotMd 10 utes to speak on an Item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic maierlols included In the Board agenda packets must submit sold material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective Public hearing. In any case, written moterlols In- tended to be considered by the Board shall be sub- mitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the gublic hearing. All matet- boa the rese mi� cm ppermanent part of the record. Any person who ctsdedd- tthhe Board wNl deed I* re cord of the proceedings rtalning there% and e may need to enstm that o verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record In- dudes vldence a = ftwh the CONTY LIDAWTY, PLO 17J ORDINANCE NO. 2001 58 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 80 -45, THE RETREAT UNIT ONE STREET LIGHTING MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING DISTRICT (MSTU); PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, The Retreat Unit One Street Lighting MSTU was created by Collier County per developer request in accordance with stipulations set forth in the Collier County Subdivision Regulations; and WHEREAS, the developer of The Retreat Unit One had street lighting installed within the subdivision after submitting the request to Collier County; and WHEREAS, neither the property owners individually nor The Retreat Homeowner's Association have shown any interest in having Collier County manage the street lighting system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: REPEAL THE RETREAT UNIT ONE STREET LIGHTING ORDINANCE NO. 80 -45 Collier County Ordinance No. 80 -45, which created The Retreat Unit One Street Lighting MSTU, is repealed in its entirety. SECTION TWO: INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section ", "article ", or any other appropriate word. SECTION THREE: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any court of competent jurisdiction holds any phrase or portion of the Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Secretary of State. PAS�AQ,A, ND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 'thayr C 2001. AT > Attest as to Chairman ' DWIWT E. BROC;;aCl��k Signature 061y. BOARD OF COUNTY COM SIGNERS COLLIER COUT TY�, FLO JAMES D. CARTER, Ph.D., Chairman Approved as to forii' and legal sufficiency: 4— Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney 17J STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -58 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 23rd day of October, 2001, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 24th day of October, 2001. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts •ark( §(�- r Ex- officio to Boa d... -0 � County Commissioiat's OVA •cam' '. dr By :Teri Michaels, ,;;••••••';�����.�'` �i 3 •' SST ti�� Deputy Clerk