Loading...
BCC Minutes 03/13/1990 R Naples, Florida, ~arch 13, lggo LET IT BE REHF. J4BERED, that the Board of County Conelseloners tn and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, ~et on this date at 9:00 A.H. In ~ S~SZON In Building 'F' of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, wtth the following ~abers present: CHAIRHAN: Hax A. Hasse, Jr. VICE.-CRAIRNAN: Nlchael J. Volpe Richard $. Shanahan Burr L. Saunderm Anne Ooodntght ALSO PRESENT: Janes C. Giles, Clerk; Carol L. McClenathen and Ellis Hoff~an, Deputy Clerks; Nell Dorrlll, County hnagerl Ron HcLe~ore, Assistant County ~nager; Thomas Olllff, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; David Welgel, Assistant County Attorney; Ken Baglnskl, Planning Services ~nager; Robert Nulhere, Ray Bellows, Ron Ntno, and Robert ~ord, Planners= Frank Brutt, Co~-unlty Development Services Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator= William Lorenz, Environmental Services Administrator; Tom Conrecode, Director, Office of Capital Projects N~nage~ent; Robert Lord, Project Planner; Sue Fllson, Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Byron Tomllnson, Sheriff,s Office. 00001 Page Narch 13~ lggO with tb foll~ln~ c~es: Item dF1 EMrgen~ Se~lceo, an lnforutional and direction seeking lunma~ off ~tters amsocIated with an Interim plan of service for afl K.rgen~ Medical Aid Station In the lnokalee Area - Added. Item 12D (Continued from 3/8/90) discussion regarding Impact Fees - Added. Item gH3.A recommendation directing the County Attorney to draft a ~oratorlus ordinance for those steam surrounding State Roads which will not ~eet the County's Growth Nanageaent Plan Concurrency requirements - Added. (To be heard prior to Item ~9H3) Board Nesting will break to Attend 4-H "KNOW YOUR OOVERNNENT" Luncheon at 12:30 P.N. Item 9H6 - Recommendation that the Board of County Coulesionere approve the renovation of Building "A" as designed and authorize the use of the line of credit as a source of financing - Continued to 3/20/90 at the request of Chairman Halle. Item ?A2 - Petition A-87-8, recowndat!on to hear an appeal of the Planning/Zoning Director's decision to refuse the Issuance of an occupational license for Sub, ay of Narco, Inc., due to non-conformance with Ordinance 82-2 - Continued to 3/20/90 at the request of Commissioner Volpe. Employee Service Awards and pine were presented to the following employees: Susan I~euy, Emergency Nedlcal Services Nalter Nolflnger, Compll&nce Services Geoffrey J. Grabner, Utllltes/Water Juan B. Cruz, Traffic Operations 5 years 5 years 5 years 10 years (Absent) PROCLJAtTX~ RECOGIXZXIO PARCH 12 - 18, 1990 AS "EIOWYOUIt ~ WEIX" - ADOFTED Open reading of the proclmtion by Co~tmaloner Shanahan ~oved, macerated by Coutseloner Goo~night ami curtal m~nl~ously, that the proclmtton recognizing Narch 12 - Hatch 13, 1990 J~rch II, ]990, a~ =~o~Tov~ ~overnnent Neek= ~ Receiving the proc]asatlon ~ere ~nnts ~nn of Naples High School ~d ~rcel~a Nedrano of ~okalee High School. Hr. Qul~ thanked Ltnda ~nntng of the 4-H and Ann Ca~p~]l fro~ the Lea~e of Voters for organizing the 1990 program, as well as the Board of County Couissioners, ~partment Heads and the Collier County ~b~lc School System for the t~e spent ~lth the ~tudents during 'Kn~ Your G~e~nt Hs. ~drano added her th~nks to all those involved ~d h~gh- ]lghted the Parks ~nd Recre~tlon visit ~nd the HRS ~tre~ch Programs as t~ of the ~st ~rab]e for her. Co~lesloner Ooodnlght lnfor~d the ~ard of County Co~lexlonere that the ~a~e of ~oeen Voters and Ne. Denning won ~ award pr~raa through the National Asooclation of Co~tle~ ~d received ~tlo~l rec~ltton. Page 3 1990 01~~ go-20 ltZ PrrxTxoM ZO-sg-30, COt~fl~MXTY D~O~ DXVXSXOM, TO O~D~ 82-2 RXSA~DXWG TZMI~ORARYUSE PZl~IX~ - ~WXTII Legal notice having been published In the Naples Daily N~wo on Fsbruax~ 22, 1990, as evidenced b~ Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was o~ed to consider Petition Z0-89-30, fJled ~ the Community Development Division, representing the Board C~ty Co~lssloners r~uestlnG an amendment to Ordinance 82-2 a~ndln~ Section 10.6 te~ra~ u~e permits, C-1, Jn order to the stl~latlons and regulations Governing th~ Issuance o~ such pora~ sales. Planner ~ulhere stated staff pro~seo to amend ~he verbiage sec~ofl 3~.6, tem~ra~ use permit, Sub-Section ~-1, ~n order ~o flexibility when issuing ~rmltm. He explained that ~rrently the Ordinance alJ~o one, two-week use ~rmlt ~r calendar year, and the revision ~ld ~rmit up to t~o non-rentable two-week permits. He said the a~nd~nt ~uld also enable the ~ard of County to issue tem~ra~ use ~rmltm for a time greater than four wmekm not greater than on~ year, and further explained that such a would ~ sub,eot to constraints and stl~latlons am deemed ~ the ~ard of County Oo~lmmlonmrm on m cam~-by-camm bamlm. Co~lmmloner Hmmmm asked why Pla~er ~]here thought At was nmClllary to have m tmm~rary ume ~rmtt for over four weeks, whim fJsrJng on t~o ~emk megmentm. P]a~er Hulhere indicated moms plaza and retail shop ~mrm Nould ZJke to ~ve temporary sa]es and at the mo~nt are restricted to one ~o week ~rait ~r slx months. ~ese shop ~ers ~ve e~ressed a deslro to carry those sales consecutively due to seasonal de~n~, he otate~. ~t la, he continued, the reason for the re~eet and to all~ rot flexibility, the ordinance has been wrltten to all~ the ~ard of County Contsstoners to issue permits of greater t~n four ~eks ~t not greater than one year. He cited ~ ample as t~ Ritz Page 4 Hatch 13, 1990 Carlton and It ~ temp~)r4r¥ Imae peralt. Commissioner H&eae stated that the period of tine is smch too long. Planner Nulhere added that the Collier County Planning Commission held their public hearing on February 15, 1990, and forwarded Petition Z0-89-30 to the Board of County Con~lssloners with a unanimous recom- nendatton of approval. Commissioner Shanahan asked Planner Hulhere about the specifics of the aa~ndaent, which as he understands, could be ~ade for two two-week segnenta and tf the petitioner cooes before the Board of County Commissioners, the Board could hake a decision to go to 364 days. Planner ~tulhere indicated Connlssloner Shanahen Is correct, he-ever, the petition Is subject to any constraints and stipulations sa deunded on a caa~-by-ca~ baals. Coulislon~r Volpe stated ha had th~ ma~ reservation about the one year period as did Commissioner Hasse, saying he did not see this as a Ritz Carlton Issue because the amendsent says "temporary ssles~ sports events, religious events, sad coemunity events.. He wanted to know what type of use te anticipated that would require the granting of a one year perslt. Planner Nulhere did not have any examples, but Indicated the ver- biage la used only to allow flexibility. Planning Services I~nsger Ken Baglnskl said there are no specific sx~plse~ but various situations have arleen In the past, exhibitions or festivals, extending beyon~ the four week period, and the &nendnent will provide the Board with the flexibility to extend the tesporary uss permit. Nr. George Keller of the Collier County Civic Federation spoke tn In opposition to the proposed smendsent stating be approves of two and four ~eek perslta, but Indicated others should not be allowed. Hr. B&glnskl explained that this amendment is not tailored for the Ritz Carlton who are ~aktng other arrangenents, and when situations &rise such as charity events on Narco Island for the Narch of Dines, Page 5 Hatch 13~ 19gO they will b~ allowed ~ore than a two week permit for their fund raiser if this amendment is approved. Conaissioner Hesse Indicated that he feels the Board already has the ps-er described by this proposed amendment. Conniesioner Shanahan ~nd~ca~ed tha~ h~ knows Chris,mas tree sales are longer than 4 weeks and, therefore, flexibility ~e a good 2dea, ~t he feels that one year lo t~ ~ong. Co~isstoner Volpe suggested striking the lan~age proposed ~ginning with "when approved ~ the Board of County Co~leeloners. Such s~cia] approvals shall ~ eub~ect to stipulations or additional constraints deemed necessa~ and appropriate to the re.est. Such sti- pulations or constraints dee~d necessa~ ~ the ~ard of Cowry Couissioners ohal~ ~ noted as condltions to the issuance ~rm{t; and the permitee ~ha~ ~ re~ired to si~ a notarized agree~nl to said stipulations or constraints.- He suggested adding ]an~age saying the Co~nity Develop~n~ Services Administrator or his desires may gran~ up to two non-rentable, two-week permits during any calendar year, and the Community Development A~lnl~trator or his designee ~y grant a non-renewable five week per- mit, and tea~rary ~rmite ~y ~ al~ed for up to an additional weeks when approved by the ~ard of County CooissJonero. Co~issioner Saunders and Co~ieoloner S~nahan agreed they do no~ want to limit flexibility alt~ether, however, CommJseloner Volpe ~ndicated the ~xlmum tl~ ~riod should ~ five weeks. County A~torney Cuyler res~nded by saying that ~he a~ve- referenced ~entence could ~ ~truck. Hr. BagJnski and Hr. Hulhere indlcated that they underst~d ~he direction o~ the Board regarding the verbiage. Hr. ~ginski indicated that he feels the ~ard should consider some kind of flexibility. Co~tssioner Hesse asked whether the Board ha~ the ~urisdiction to extend the time, to which Coun~ Attorne~ Cuyler re~nded that the ~ard does not under ~he current Ordinance. O00J4 Page March 13, leg0 flexibility of mo.~ kind. Hr. Hulhere indicated this alen~ient could be .et up .o the ~rden proof ~or an exten, lon ~11 ~ ~lth the ~tltloner. ~~ ~ ~teT~ into Ordl~ce ~k No. 3e ~lth t~ e~d pr~ ~1~ with ~ cam Oi~DZNA31'C~ 90-20 A~ ORDInAnCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY BY AMENDING SECTION 10.6 SUBSECTION C-i, TEMPORARY USE PERMITS TO BETTER DEFINE THE TIME CONSTRAINTS AND FREQUENCy OF SUCH TEMPORARY USE PERMITS; TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAl, TINE LIMITS FOR SUCH PERMITS UPON APPROVAL OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOliERS; TO CHANGE REFERENCES FROM ZONING DIRECTOR TO COMMUNITy DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABXLI?y; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ~u AJI~TA N. p~ Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on February 22, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition R-89-30, flied by Robert L. Duane, of Hol~, Hontes and Associates, Inc. repre- senting Anita N. Pltt~an, requesting a rezone of &pProxJs~tely .5 acres froa IO~RP to C-6 to a]lo~ for the expansion of the parking Jot and accessory uses for the funeral hOaeo PJanner Ray Bellows stated the Petitioner wishes to rezone .5 acres and to obtain a provisional use which Is a companion Petition, to alloM for the expansion of the existing funeral ho~e and parking lot. The subject site Is not located In an Activity Center, Planner Bellc~s said, and the rezone to C-6 would peralt in-fill colulerclel zontng which Is allo~ed outside of Activity Centers. This would allow Page 7 0001,5 Na~ch 13, 1990 a transition In land uae from higher to lower intensities for proper- ties that are no longer ideally suited for residential development, he noted. The petitioner proposes to add a buffer along the outside of the property to screen tt from adjacent land, he continued° Responses from all Collier County reviewing agencies have not identified any conflicts with the Growth Hanagement Plan and on Februar~ 15, lggo, the Collier County Planning CouJssion recommended approval of the plan 6/0, Planner Bellows told the Commission. He indicmted that staff reconnends approval and no correspondence to the contrary has been received. Co~tsstoner Bases asked Planner Bellowm to define accessory uses as they apply to this petition. Hr. Bellows stated that there is a shed on the southwest corner that will be used for storage or addi- tional offices. Co~uaisaloner Volpe noted that the petitioner has indicated he wll! not uae Banboo Drive for accaamo Hr. Bellows and Hr. Robert Duane both confiraed thim. Conniasioner Volpe also inquired if there is an existing septic tank in the area and Hr. Duane confiraed this. Commissioner Volpe asked what will happen to the septic system and the drainfia]d? Hr. Duane indic&ted they will continue to use the exlmting mtruc- ture but do not anticipate any sewage generation. Coulesioner Hesse wanted to know If there ia a law regarding the filling in of the septic area and Nr. Duane Indicated that If it were hooked up to a permanent sewe~ system, the septic tank will have to be disconnected and filled. Conaisstoner Hesse asked tf parking.will be on top of the septic tank area, to which Mr. Duane referred to the site plan and deaonotrated that there will be no pavement directly over the septic tank area. Coolasloner Volpe questioned if the rezone ia granted, will there be parking on the existing septic tank and drain field or will it have to be relocated. 0001G Page 8 March 13~ 1000 Mr. Duane ~ndlcated that the septic tank lo located next to the exlettng etngle family structure and the parking will be to the North. CoBItlilon4~ ~ ~oved, Hconded by ~lsoi~r c~tg ~lmly, to close the ~bllc batik. ~i~ ~t~2y, t~t t~ ordl~e ~ nu~r~ ~ tlt2~ bl~ b ~tg with ~ access fr~ h~ ~tve, ~ ~t~ Into ~~ ~ ~o. 38: O~DZ~MICZ 90-21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONIN~ ATLAS MAP NUMBER 50-25-1 BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY lOCATED ON SOUTH SIDE OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST (US-41} AND WEST SIDE OF BAMP~)O DRIVE IN SECTION 11, TOI4NSIIIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 KAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONTAINING .5 ACRES, FROM MHRP TO C-6 FOR EXPANSION OF FUNERAL ROI(E; AND BY PROVIDING AN KF~ECTIVE DATE. Page 9 0001 ? Hatch 13, 1990 J~0Jl 90-152 RI PrfX?10Jf PU-89-21, ROBERT L. Dq2AII OF X0LK, F~OVISZ~ U~ =C= OF T]~ C-6 ZONZ~G DXSTRZCT FOR PA, KKI~ r, OTAB~ AC~'*ES~USLS fOR & I~3'B'KRAL HOMI AT ~FI~RSKCT~OW or ~,S. 41 &~D BJtJqBOO DRZVE - &lX)pTKD WITH C~_~GE (C~AJ~,ZO~ TO R-89-30) Co~m/eeJoner Saundere moved, eeconded by CommleoLoner Voll;M and carrJedm~onimou~ly, that ReoolutJon 90-152 re Pet/t/on PU-89-21, roqueoting PrOV/olonal uoe 'C' or the C-6 zonlng dLetrict for expan- sion or the perking lot and ecceeoory me for a funeral home be mSoptod mzb~ect to there hetngno accede from Bamboo Page 10 Hatch ~3, 1990 O~III&JIC~ ~O-22, lq~l~XC llI~RX~O ~0 COlffiXI~X All ~X~ ~X~ ~~ ~ ~X~ WO. 87-100, ~Z~X~ ~, ~DZ~ ~ ~Z~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ PX~ ~A~ ~Z~ ~ ~gal notice having ~en ~blJshed in the Naples Dally Re~s on lebrum~ 22, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of ~bltcatlon flied ~lth the Clerk, ~blic hearing ~as o~ned to consider an ordinance amending Ordl~ce 87-100, ~e~tlon One, providing for Inclusion of t~ entrance ~mnts for Plnehur.t ~states ~Jth~n the ~]y Oolf Estates ~tiflcation Director of Capital Projects, Tgi Conrecode, told the ~ard that the ordinance 1~ to revise the ~ndaries to include two entr~ce ~n~nts ~Ithln the ~autifJcation District for ~y Golf ~states. Co~tlstoner Hasee asked If th~ were on the origlna~ p~an and Conrec~e s~ld they ~ere not Included. ~ ~J~ ~1~1y, to clo~ t~ ~bllc ~a~/ng. ~ ~tH m/~ly, t~t t~ ord/~ce u ~r~ ~ 0~~ 90-22 &N O~ZNAKCE ~E~DZ~G CO~Z~R COU~ ORDZNANCE NO. 8~-100, S~CTZON 0~, BY PROViDing ~OR ]~C~US~OR OF ~O (2) E~CE ~E~S PINKHURST ESTATES ~ITHIN ~K LELY OOL~ ESTATES BEAtifICATION ~NICIPAL SK~ICK TAXING UNIT; ~OVIDING FOR CONVICT A~ SKVK~BZLITY; PROVIDING FOR AN K~ECTIVK DATE. Itu ~2 u.~ o~ SO ~ lO C _ Legal not/ce having ~en ~bllehed In the ~a~le~ Daily Re~ on Yeb~m~ 25, 1990, and Harc~ 4, ]990, a~ ~denced ~ Affl~vJt o~ ~bl/catlon flied ~lth the Clerk, public hearing ~am o~ned to con- eider Petitioner AV-89-020, tiled by Agno]l, Barber and B~dage, ~epre~entlng Nonterey Ae~oclate~, requemtlng ~ vacation off m portion o~ ~ drainage easement Jn Tract A, and all of Lot~ 125 throug~ 132, Page J~arch 13, 1990 Viii&gee of J(onterey, Unit One, eo the Petitioner can rapist. Hr. George Archibald of the Transportation Department acknowledged that In processing the vacations es requested they would like to have the new plat and the vacation occur at the same leering or within the same period of tine. Nr. Archibald asked the Board of County COmllsetonere to take one of two neaeures; to defer the Petition until the actual platttng of Unit Four occurs, or to consider continuing this Item for about three weeks, et which time the plat for Unit Four may be scheduled. The appropriate letters of no ob~ectlon from the utilities have been received and staff has no objection to this Petition, he noted. The ordinance dictates that the Board should take ltl action concurrently with the replattlng of the proPerty for the purpose of not leaving proPerty unplatted, Hr. Archibald said. Hr. Jack NcKenna of Agnoll, Berber end Brundsge, representing Monterey Associates, Indicated the Petitioner would like to have the vacation contingent upon the approval of the plat aa the advertising does not becose an Issue. The plat should be ready very soon, he said, as It la currently being reviewed b~ county staff. Hr. NcKenna slid the plat will not be recorded until ~uet prior to the approval of Unit Four. County Attorney Cuyler Indic&ted that this Is pommlble but the Bo&rd usually tries to stay &w&¥ frei approving resolutions lub~ect to later conditions. OomudoelotM~ Yelps ~oved, seconded b~ Commissioner Smzndear8 end Legal notice baying been publiahed la the Naples Dally N~8 on Feb~a~ 2~, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of ~bllcatton filed ~ith Page 12 000 Has'ch 13, I990 the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consJder Petltlon 5HP-89-19 filed by y. ff. Rowe of Portella-Rowe Associates, Inc. representing Porter AG Richardson, requesting subdivision mester plan approval for Untt 32, Tract 94, Golden Gate Estates according to plat thereof recorded /n Plat Book ?, Pages 21-22, public records, Call/er County, Florida, In Section 9, Township 49, Range 26, cons/st/rig of nine acres. (Sunrise Subd. J Senior Project Planner Ran Nino stated that the Petttton tm to re-~ubd/v/de a tract located on the North s/de of Second Avenue and Fast of Logan Boulevard. Re lnd/cated that the Pet/tion has been reviewed and no /nconslstenc/es were found. ~ach lot would be more than 2-1/4 acres, he continued, and the Pet/t/on has been approved b~ the Collier County Planning Commissioner and staff recouends appro- val. Comlssloner Volpe asked bow the single faally residence which currently exists on the property will be accessed? Planner RinG Indicated they will be accessed by the prlvste street w~/ch currently exists w/th a 30e right-of-way and a 12~ pavement. Coulee/Gnat Va]ps expressed concern that tf the petition ts granted the o~ners of the homes currently accessed by the street, w/il not have access. Planner N/no explsined that in the future when rseubdlv~a/on pet/- tionl Ira reviewed, stsff will insure the 30e dedicat/on w~ll occur /~m~distel¥ sd~acent to the 30~ dedication previously mede, ~nd require the buIlder to bring about a 12' pavement wh/ch would g~ve a 60~ r/ght-of-wa¥ and 24~ pavement, done /n 2 d/fferent segments. Co~m/ss/oner Volpe asked ho~ this wll! be addressed ~n th/s pet/- t~on? P1L~mer #lno exp]a/ned that when the id~acent p~ope~ty ~a deve- loped the 12~ of pavement along the property 1/ne w/Il be required to be paved, which s~ounts to planning ~ha]f Ntreets~ on a te~porsry balls. Couissloner Volpe noted the 30* right-of-way Is a reduct/on In amount of right-of-way, but needs clef/ricer/on as to how much 000 9 Page 13 hoses will actually front on the existing public street thus 4 holes will be served In this plan. Planning Services Nanager Ken Baginski Indicated that the safeguards are In place because all applicants Lust subLlt site plans for proposed developments which Include adjacent or existing roads and they are reviewed by lany different divisions of the planning staff which constitutes a nuLber of checks and balances. Co~mlssloner Volpe asked If the 12f access will be adequate for the fire department and their equipment. Planner Nlno Indicated the fire dep&rtlent has accepted the plan. March 13, 1990 psvelent and ho~ much right-of-way will be present upon co-pletlon of the property development, which Planner Nlno Indicated that there be a total of 60' of right-of-way and 24~ of paveLent, noting that 2 lq~eTe being no eecoelled bT Commissioner Ooodntght and ca. led ~n~ntlo~ely, to clo~ c~lseloMr ~ ~ved, seconded by co~laetone~ ~oodnlo~t smd ~led 4/1 (Colllloloner Volpe opposed), th4t Petition be ~i~ed, tberebT Mtopttng Jteeolution 90-1a3. 00030 Page March 13, 1990 1,ooo FI:ET TO PIqUeT & FARM ~-~-~ ~.-.~ ~ ~ Y~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ 951 D ~~LT Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on February 25, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with tbs Clerk, public h-driflg was opened to cons]der Petit]on V-89-11 flied by Nons Spagna, represeflt/ng Harvey Brothers Farms, Inc. requesting a 744 foot vsrlance from the required front ysrd setback of 1,OO0 feet to 256 feet to p~rmlt a farm labor camp for property located approximately 1/4 mile west of C.R. 95! and approximately 285 feet north of Vanderbilt Beach Road, ]n Section 34, Totmsh]p 48 South, Range 26 East, toll]er County, Florida. Project Planner Robert Lord indic&ted to the Board that the variance request lo to allow a farm labor camp with 15 mobiJe homes to provide living accommodations for 8 to 10 tndividua~ farm workers per mobile ho~e on 5 acres of an 820 acre agricultural farm operation. He continued, the site is adjacent to and east of two existing metal farm buildings used for farm material storage and several axJst]ng mobA~s hom~s that house the farm*m key permonnel. Planner Lord further Indicated this ]and is zoned A-2 smd land to the North, East, and West is zoned A-2 also, adding that Jafld to the South ]s zoned "K' with a few homes, but is mostly vacant land. Five letters of objection from the neighbors to the south, strongly objecting because of neg~tlve Impact and adverse affect on their property value have been received, Planner Lord stated. Staff found, Mr. Lord said, granting the variance wlJ] not be in harmony with the genera! intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance and recommends denial. Ne also noted that the ColJJer County Planning Commission for~arded Petition V-89-11 to the Board of Zoning Appea~s w~th a recommendation of denial (5/1). Mr. Nons Spagfla, representing Harvey Brothers* Farms, presented p~ctures to the board representing the subject property and explained Page 15 March 13, 1990 each of the eight pictures which included a typical layout with irri- gation ditch, rods, plat rows, etc., the immediate areas to the east, went, and south, and the amount of vi·lbiJity the mite would have from various locations. Re also noted the variance ia not what it appears because 145 feet was taken as right-of-way for the VanderbJlt Be·ch Road Extension, ·nd originally the distance required was 600 feet and · change to 1000 feet made compliance difficult. Hr. ipagna indicated that if it were not for the fact that Harvey Brothers needs a variance due to the close proximity to the re·d, he would not be in front of the Board° Be also indicated that the Petitioner would be willing to accept · temporary variance for a period of five years if the Board as decides. Nfo Steve Otto, property owner in the described ·rea spoke to the Board regarding the eyesore he feels the the labor camp will create and the amount of congestion that will be created on the 951 corridor in that area. Mr. Oeorge ~ller, representing the Go]den Gate Estate· C/vic Association, indicated the association feels th·t this particular spot la not appropriate and will be an eyesore due to the debrta, etc. that this particular typ~ of camp creates. Mr·. Dorothy Box, representing Golden Oats Estate· Area Civic Association, told the Bo·rd that the ~eabers have ~et and concluded that the variance should not be granted because the 1000 feet buffer zone Is vlt&l. She ·leo Indicated there would prob&bly be · violation of the county easement because the cars from the labor camp ~ould be parked on Vanderbllt B~ach Road, adding that the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Assocltlon believes the petition does not fit with Collier Countyfs Growth Nanage~ent Plan mad urges the Board to deny the Petition. Mr. Fred Harvey spoke to the Board regarding the need ha has to house the laborers on the farm because they are presently transporting the ~orkers from Pt. Myers, Bonita Springs and Iuokalee, whtch la too grs&t · distance. O003? Page I~re. Elaine Oll~ore indicated that ]f she had taken the pictures eho~n to the board they would have been taken different]y, because the property is not kept up and wil! be worse If the variance ]e granted. She indicated approve! will lower property values and be detrimental to future developeent of adjacent propert]ee. Co"""tseloner Vamps noted that since staff has done a factual and- lye~e of the requested variance and ham recommended denial, he can see no basts for the granting of the variance. OmmmAmmAomer Volpe moved, oeconded by Commiealonm~ S~ end OmmmAmmio~er Volpm movmd, seconded by Com~immlonmr Smunderm m~d (ml'~Ml~mslmoT~Zy, to ~CC~l)t the ~tion of Staff ~3d the Collier Comet3, Plmmlng Comelealon m~ den~ Petition V-89-11. 00' I~puty Clerk ~off~n r~laced Deput~ Clerk Nc~le~then at thim time Xtem ~TI1 S~~ ~0-154, PETXTZOM PU-l~-26C, II10 3. IPA~MA, Project Planner ~l]~s advised that the subject property located at the intersection of EuotJo Avenue and ~oker ~ulevard l~kalee. He infor~d that 'the Zoning Ordinance re~irmm that a praisings use extension be approved before the expiration date the origi~2 provJm/o~] ume req~)eot. Hr. hli~s infor~d that Dr. Xeno J. Spagna, of Y~or/~ Urban I~t/tute, Inc., representing the IKka]ee HaJtJ~ Free Church, b advised that his c~lent ~8 started const~ct/on mm this date. Commissioner OoodnJght noted that Af the petitioner ham been issued a building permit, the Commies/on does not need to ~ule on this ,item. Dr. Spagna affirmed that construction of the church lo underway, however0 he counted that if there should be a contingenc~Z of some Page 17 00035 Hatch 13, 3990 sort and th? petitioner needs the additional time, he would like to h~ve It, County Attorney Cu¥Ier advised that there is no harm tn approving ~o~aleetoner Ooodnlght noved, seconded by Commissioner Samndere ~i~ ~i~ly~ t~t Petltl~ ~-88-25C ~ ~rmd~ there~ ~t~ b~lutta 90-154. Page 18 March 13~ 1000 ~ a~ xw ~X~ C~ACX~ ~s. ~rbara M. Hattemer, representln9 ~orallty in MedJa of Naples, Inc., advised that the final recommendation of the Orand Jury in 1983 was that Collier County consider the adoption of a cosprehenslve ordl- ~nce re~latin9 adult entertaln~nt establlshaents. She noted that this issue has not ~en addressed until n~. She stated t~t the intent ts not to establish a co~nlt~ s~andard, ~t aerel~ to deal with the Issue and alternative channels for sexually explicit ~terlal. ~. ~atte~r re.fred that State Attorney ~oseph D'Alessandro ~rts t~ zonln9 concept to re. late the sale of se~lly oriented ~terlal as op~sed to obscene ~terlal. ~. Hatteser provided a co~ of a saaple ordi~nce which contains a state~n~ that sakes It ve~ clear that obscene uterlal la welco~: It As not the Intent of the C~nty Council to condone or legttlalze the distrACtion of obscene ~terla~, and the C~ncll rec~izes that state 1~ prohibits the distribution of obscene uterlals and ex~cts and encourages state enforcesen~ officials to enforce state obscenity statutes a~ainst any such llleoal activities. Sh~ lnfor~d that there have been ~ny studies An other cities that have found that these ~slnesses have ~n~erous effects on ~bllc health, and result In the Increase In sexual diseases and encourage the spread of AIDS, cause a decline An property values and an Increase in cri~ rates close to the facilities. She indlcated tha~ the of t~ ordinance Is to pro~te the heal~h, safety, ~rals ~d 9eneral welfare of the citizens of the County and to lessen t~ effects of ~ch ~lne~e~ on ~he ~urround~ng co~unA~. N~. ~e~er sta~ed that ~he Supre~ Court ha~ eaAd t~t any coa- ~rcAal es~ablAsh~n~ ~y be re~lated which ~ a~ one of t~lr prin- ciple ~sJnes~ puttees, the sale of oe~ally explicit ~ter~a}l. She Page 19 March 13, 2990 ~oted that this applies to adult book stores; adult arcades; adult nightclubs, bars and restaurants that feature live sex perforaancss or film sexual activities; adult motels; adult theaters and motion pic- ture theaters: escort agencies; nude model studios; sexual encounter studios; and video stores which rent a wide variety of ~oviee Including family ~ovles, If one of the rental of hard 'R* or 'X' rated video cassettes. She indicated that the ordinance muggeeta setbacks and disbursement requirements so that there Is no concentration of these businesses in the co.~.unit¥, and their effects are lessened. I~, Hatte~er requested that the County review the ~aterial, and draft an ordinance for the Com~isston*a consideration. Capt. Jackie K]ine of the Sheriff's Office, advised that the ordinance ae proposed has been reviewed, and It la found to be vex-~ complete. He stated that the iheriffes Office supports the adoption of a similar ordinance in Collier County. Reverend Andrew De~ong com.~ented that it would be an asset for Collier County to adopt such an ordinance which would keep the com- munity's standards very high, and it would mak~ a difference relative to the youth in Collier County. He advised that he te In receipt of a letter fro~ the $heriff of Lee County, end he says that an ordinance of this type will eliminate ~any cease of murder, rape, drug dealing, etc. Reverend ~e~ong stated that statistics from a pornography study reveal that lO0~ of ~ale Junior and high school students and 89~ of the female students are seeing so~e of these things, and are drawing false conclusions as to what sexuality ia al! about. Commissioner Shanahan indicated that he feels that tt ts very im~ortant that the Commission consider an ordinance, aa proposed, to protect the quality of life and Collier County's youths. C4~mm~ml~r ~l~nahan moved, ~ecomied that tk C~t~ ittor~j, d4~r~lo~ to C~lll~z- Co~nt~ ~nd bring b~ck to the Comm~esiou; Its. htt~ to 00(],1.1 Narch 13, 1~90 mndc with the Co,ntT Attorney ~n ~ ~ 8h~]d ~ underst~d ~ l~ goes ~yond ~he Ls~es of obsceni- ties. He noted that the o~dJnance wou~d a]~ sexually o~ented acti- vities to ~ re~lated within a s~c~al zoning district. He Indicated t~ t~ C~n~y will ~ establishing ~ldeltnes to give ~eglt~ to thtm kl~ of activity. Co~lsslon~r ~aund~rs l~lcated that h~ do~s not ~1t~ that ~sl~tng this kind of ordinance ~Id motivity, ~t ~rely reco~lzlng t~t there are certain things that · r~ ~r~itt~d under th~ ~.~. Constitution that cannot ~ prohibited. ~ note~ tMt this ~oul~ ~ s ~y to re. late those activities. Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on February 2, 1990, as evidence¢; b~ Affidavit of Publication flied with the Clerk, bids were received for Bid #90-1525 for two replacement Hydraulic excavators until 2:30 P.N., February 14, 1990. Transportation Services Administrator Archibald tnfor~d that this Item is a follo~ up to the Com/selon'e directive of January 23, 1990, when bid results were considered for Bid 189-1489. He reported that specifications were prepared for a 6 x 6 hydraulic excavating unit, and the prices that were submitted were approximately $290,000, but the budget was In the vicinity of $244,000. He stated that Staff was directed to bid out a smaller unit. 000,15 Page 21 March I3, 1990 Nfo Archibald advised that a smaller unit was bid through Bid · 90-1525. He noted t~t one bid propoea! was received, and 2 letters fro~ other bidders were received indicating a concern relative to meeting the specifications. He stated that the one bid that was received is not only competitive, but it also represents a piece of machinery with go~ productlvJty and ~ntenance experience w~th other C~ntlem thr~g~t the State of F~orlda. Mr. Archibald stated that Staff ls reco~end~ng that the bid from 0.9. ~iwnt Co. in the aunt of 8213,500 ~ ~ppr~ed. ~~ ~i~ly, to ~d Bid ~9~1525 for ~ ~1c rests to S.S. ~t~t ta t~ ~t of It~ ~l ~blic Services Administrator O'~nnel] stated that on Feb~a~ 27, 1990, the Co.lesion directed Staff to attend a ~rch 1, 1990, auc- tion for the Hainland ~rtlon of the Co~lin Point pro~rty and authorized a purchase a~nt not to exceed 15~ of the higher value of the Bluebill pro~rty ~s of W~em~r, 1989. He advtmed Zhat Staff was the muccessful bidder at the auction and the property was ~rchased for ,2,075,000. Nr. O'~nnell lnfor~d that the Clerk of C~rts will Isle Cert~ficate of Title to Collier C~nty, and noted t~t Staff Is in the procesm of acquiring ~ll the necessary documents to clear the title to t~t pro~rty. Hr. O'~nnell indicated that the pro~rty was f~ded ~de~ real{ocation of f~ds within ~nds 306 and 345. He mtated that there are ~tmta~lng t~es and fees ~n the a~t of ~195,549 that will be paid to complete the tr~sactlon. Mr. O'~m]] stated that the disposition of the Blueblll site ~lng ~nitored by the County Attorney's office ~nding any 11tlgatlon t~t ~y re~lt from se~rlng the Conkltn site. He noted that upon O00.1G Page 22 approval from the County Attorney, Staff will come back to the Commission to obtain authorization to sell the Blueblll site. In answer to Co~mlssloner Haase, Mr. O'Donnell informed that he Is optimistic that the County will be able to acquire sufficient funds fro~ the sale of the Blueblll property to not only cover the cost of the land acquisition, but also for development costs associated with the boat launching facility. He stated that ~ore land was acquired th~n ~t~t was originally anticipated. Commissioner Sh~mh~nquestloned the ~ount of the November appraisal of the Bluebill property, to which Nr. O'Donnell affirmed was $2,350,000. Hr. O'Donnell stated that there ham been a great demand for parking at the SR-9SI, Caxambaa, and Bayvie~ boat launching facili- ties, arid noted .that the additional acreage of the Conklln site will allo~ the flexibility for addltion~l parking spaces. Commissioner Shanahan ~entioned that he would like to see the $R-951 and C~bas ra~p facilities expanded since they are both over utilized at this point In tl~e. Comelssioner Volpe questioned the amount of the ~ost recent appraisal of the Blueblll site? Nr. O'Donnall Informed that one appraisal was $l,?00,000, and another was $3,300,000. Hr. O'Donnell stated that no action la required on this tree. Its ~l D~OEJ, LKE, llrVZ~L~ COI~I~IBOTI01~ TI~T KIlT BZ AVAXLABLE TO DEFRAY COSTS; air!) ~ ~,~aoz TO ,1sCC OX 3/20/90 ~mergenc¥ Services Adalnlstrator Reardon explained that at the Harch 6, 1990, meeting, the Co~mlsslon directed staff to gather infor- smtlon associated with an Interim Emergency Nedlcal Aid System in the I~mok~lee area. He stated that the executive summary Identifies some of the operational problems, operational needs, what may be required as elements of the system, and the minimum fln&ncIal costs to I~pls- meat the program. Page 23 000,17 Narch I3, 1990 Nr. Reardon advised that the slnlmua cost to start the program Is approximately 0348,000. He noted that one area that wall provide a tremendous anount of help to the service delivery for emergenc~ and ~n-~rgency is the elelent of trans~rtatJon. He ~ndJcated that ~y ~ wise to ~e into this syste~ Jncrenentally ~ starting with the trans~rtatlon ele~nt so that the citizens of the Z~oks~ee ares ~uld h~ve a ~ay to get thesselves into the gre~ter Naples ~re~ and ~ck ho~, rather than r~dlng In an a~lance. He noted that this ~lll .ll~ Staff to g~ther additional data u~n ~hlch future actions could ~ based for on-site se~lce pr~lslons. In an~er to Commissioner Hesse, ~r. Reardon explained that Staff is ~ooklng at ~n lnterl~ plan to solve the need whtch exlsts, ' for up to · t~ ye.r ~rl~, a~ to ~rk closely ~tth ~aples Co~tty Bospit.l, the private sector ~nd the ~dlcal casualty to arrange a fixed facility tn the I~kalee ,rea for a long ter~ solution to pro- vide e~rgen~ health care. In mr to Co~tssloner VoI~, Nr. Reardon stated that 8t~ff can ~ve ~lckly to ~t s tr~s~rtatlon shuttle into effect and the cost ~uld ~ a~roxi~tely ,52,0OO-,14~,000. He indicated that if th~ step ~]d ~ tranf~rtatlon. He suggested that a ohut~le ~g~n 2 tripe ~r day, mild this could ~ expanded in the future, dependlng on the lo~d de~fld. He explmined that the shuttle ~lll le~]ce those ~roono ~ need otabil1~atl~n .Jnd tremt~nt, as welA as providing access for other area residents that can not ge~ tats the c~nAc but do ~ed to seek medlcal care ~ha~ 18 not e~rgency tn Cou~sslofler Vo]~ questioned wha~ the p~ck up and drop off ~ld ~? Mr. Reardon lnformed that the I~kalee Clinlc~ Naples Co~nity Hospital, and the North Collier Clinic wl]~ be the pick up ~ drop off Nr. ~ardon ~ggeoted t~t ~ voucher ~otem ~ used. He stated t~ this ~ld ~ vall~ted ~ ~ para~dlc or ooMone mt the He ~ted ~hat the voucher ~ou]d ~ndtcate the peroon*l name~ mn Page 24 Hatch 13, 1990 authorized signature, and the round trip would be used one tl~e only during · 24 hour period after Issuance. Re stated that this would hopefully control that the appropriate people are using the shuttle. Co--Ieeloner Shah·hen questioned whether Staff is prepared to move on the transportation element of the plan? Hr. Reardon replied that if the Comsisston so directs, he could get the competition ~nvolved and arrive at firs figures. County Hen·get Dorrl]l indic·ted that St·fl la prep·red to do this during the coming ~eek and suggested that the Commission waive the normal sealed bid process. He stated that sealed quotes will be received from local transportation, van, or airport shuttle co~panies for two trips l~r day, and coordinate the voucher system with the Clerk's Office to verify ho~ the provider will be paid. He noted that · system can be ready to go by the end of next week. Commissioner Shah·hen stated that there is an urgency to have a plan In place as soon as possible, and he suggested that Staff be directed to obi·in figures for transportation. County Nan·get Dorrll] reported that he has had conversations with the personnel from Collier County Health Services and Naples Community Hospital. He advised that the hospital ts willing to provide resour- ces, but he would ·leo like to d·termine what Collier Health Servicesf ability is to help pay for this program. Commie·loner Shah·hen suggested that CURE be advised of what ts transpiring. Hr. Rsardon advised that he will contact Reverend Allen · s quickly as possible, and noted that he would like to meet with Trl- County personnel one ~ore time. r.~rrl~4 .m4~lmmamly0 that the County I~m~r be dirmcte4 te ml~ the oomp~tltlv~ biddt~ process and put together · trsm~portation mhuttls ~temo begl~al~ with 2 tripe per da~ which ~a~ I~ mrpa~sd in tbs future; CovatT#m~ger to look into contributions which~ be ~m/lable to belpdefr~ the co~ts, and preeent ·p~ckage to the ~J~m o~ 9/20/90. Page 25 OO0,19 14~rch 13, 1990 Co~/~Jo~er Sa, n~e~s ~GGe~ted that tn the f~ture. ~taff look at ~hether the Glo~y 3 or 4 ~Ge color ,e~ratton~ are needed. ~ ~i~ ~inly, to nt~rize ~t in th ~t of to ~1~ ~Lntt~ ~ for t~ pr/nt/~ of t~ C~W'I 2989 It~~ Gr~th Hnnnge~nt Director LJtsJnger explained that this Item recomn~tlon that the Coulssion direct the C~nty Attorney's offlce to draft ~r~torin and ASI ordinances for those ~rea8 ~rr~ndJng rolds ~lch do not ~et the C~nty'e Gr~th ~nage~nt Plan con- ~rrency r~uire~nts. Hr. LJtsinger call~ attention to his ~nd ~t, entltled ~blLc YacllLtle~ OrdJ~nce', Section ?.2.1, which ~tlt~8 alter- nit,yes to the Collision, sh~ld the neceesa~ proJect~ as Iden- tified, not ~ able to ~ funded. Hr. Llt~lnger Itated that the Cou~l~Jon ~1~ ~ prelented ~n the ve~ near future ~lth the Re,dial Amend~ntB ~8 cal~ed for Ln StJ~lited Settle~nt Agree~nt with ~A, m~clfJc~lly, 2.5.1F ~ 1.5.3F. Hr. LJt~Lnger re,fred t~at It Js Staff'e ~s1tJon that the optl~ to the ~ard of County Coul/sloners at this ~/nt ire ~rr~. He advlsed that on Apr1~ 24, 1990, ~hen the a~nd~nt~ to the Gr~th ~ge~nt Plan are ~opted there ~Jll be the choice to: 1. Continue Jssulng developMnt ordere along deflclen~ Toads ~lch ~LII require tht the C~nty fund the rold ~Jth or without the Sales Tax revenue; or 2. Place a ~ratorium or designate ASI'I iro~ road t~t are defJcLent for a ~rJod of t1~ until i can ~ held and the outco~ of a eales t~x dete~1~d. Hr. Lttsinger referred to CIE - 20, Policy 1.5.2F, ~d t~t t~ ~age that ~tll ~ Included In the Plan on April 24, 1990, Page 26 Hatch 13, 1990 The construction of required facilities scheduled in the County's Schedule of Capital Improvements prior to October 1, 1994 will not be delayed, deferred or removed from the Capital Improvement ile~nt if the facilities have been relied upon for issuance of a development order. Mr. Lltalnger stated that there tm a similar Policy relating to ro~ls on CIE - 22, Policy 1o5.3F. He noted that It takes a plan a~enda4nt to eliminate, defer, or delay construction of any Category '&' public facilities. He Informed that the current CIE and the CIE update that the Commission will be presented with during the next 60 days, Include projects which are Category 'A" and they are dependent upon the ?th cent sales tax. He indicated that an alternate funding source, which may be relied upon to fund those projects, has not been tdel~tifled. He advised that after April 24, 2990, if development orders ire Issued that are dependent on those projects in the plan, the County has bought those Improvements. Nr. Lltslnger related that there ere other options, but Staff Is not recosmending thee for several reasons. He lnforsed th&t those options are as follows: Lo. er the level of Service on the deficient roads: Staff has previously attempted to lo~r the Level of Service on 951, but this was rebutted by the State. Lowering the Lt~vel of Service on Local roads would involve lowering the quality of life in Collier County, and Staff does not believe this reflects the desires of the community. This would require a plan aNndment. Change the way the 'Peak Hour' is measured: This would require a plan a~endlent. Use a level of Service averaging system: This has been used In other Counties, ~tnd would require a plan alendment. Noratorlusm on State Roads until the State improves the roads that they are responsible for: Noratorlums cannot be of an indefinite period. There must be a definite plan to remedy the situation. Refocus all non-CIE funding toward CIE deficit projects: There Is $?? million in deficient State Roads; if all of the I Hill Capital Fund were rededicated, the deficiency could not be met. Do not adopt the amendments agreed to within the stipulated settleuent agreement: This would result in the edJilnistra- tire hearing process and the loss of revenues. Mr. Lltainger advised that Staff is recouendlng that the Couisston direct the County Attorney's office to prepare for adver- Page 27 00¢)51 March 13, 1000 timing, ordinances which will establish ASX*o and place a moratorium on development which negatively impacts the deficient Reade listed upon the attached exhibit and provide direction as to the scope of the area to be included within the moratorium. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Litsinger stated that this item is being presented at this time, in order to meet the necessary advertising re(pxlrements for public hearings on the ASI and Moratorium ordinances so that the~ stay be adopted by the April 24, 1990 deadline. Commissioner Volpe indicated that he has a problem with being put up against the well without an opportunity to reflect upon what is being presented. He noted that he feels that the options as presented by Staff are no options at all= either declare a moratorium around certsin ASI'e around State Roads, or continue to issue development orders end commit to $?7 million of improvements without a revenue mource. He questioned whether any consideration was given to m com- bination of any of the other alternatives? Mr. Llteinger informed that other things were considered, and will be presented later in the meeting when the moles tax presentation is m~de. He advised that Staff felt that to commit the entire I Mil! fund ~ould not only create the precedent of funding State smd/or County Road improvements with property taxes, but it ~ould alas put the County In & difficult situation regarding its men¥ other Capital needs that will be faced In future years if mi! those dollmrm were committed to the CIE. Chief Transportmtion Plmru~r Perry mdvised that if it im deter- mined that the ASI approach is to be used, direction is needed as to the scope of the ASX*e: the acres of land and the areas that will be covered by e~. He informed that there is presently a conwultant*s study underway to confirm or deny the deficiencies, and noted that the preliminary results should be received by mid April. In anwwer to Commifeloner Volpe, Mr. Perry explained that the report analyzing the Davis Boulevard corridor has been completed. He noted that there are several DRX*e that have committed to their fair Hatch 13, 1990 share of funding provided that there la an area wide funding ecanario, i.e. the creation of a apecial taxing diatrtct in that area. fie indi- cated that Berkshire Lakes has provided for a portion of the four- lantng, and Staff la tn the process of negotiating with the Brettone Park DRI since they have agreed to participate financially In extending the existing four-lane Job ao~e distance based on their contributions. Ne remarked that this will b~ a help to the problee, but unfortunately, it does not rectify the entire problem, ·nd there will still be a deficient segment of highway. Hr. Perry displayed three ~apa depicting three approaches of dealing with the deficient roadway segments. He informed that the first approach is the direct access approach where any parcels of land that have direct access to · particular deficient link ~ould be affected by a ~oratorium. Re indicated that in the case of arterial segments, this appro&ch does not satisfy the concurrency a~ndate. Hr. Perry lnfor~d that the opposite side of the scale Is the approach that would uae computer ~odel traffic that la coming to and from developments using e particular arterial highway. He noted that this takes Into consideration the travel from ~arco Island, up $R-951 to the ~ainland, the Oolden Oats traffic that goes Into Davis Boulevard, and the North Naple·/Bonit· Springs Bonita B~ach are· that co~ea do~n U.S. 41 to arrive at services and eaploy~ent centers in the Naples area. He advised that this accounts for 80~ of the traffic using these roadways. In answer to Cosmtaaloner Volpe, Nr. Perry reported that the total a~ount of acreage that would be impacted by the ~oratorltus ordinance ia: 2,645 acres in the narrow case; ?8,800 acres in the larger case; and 33,3?5 acres In the siddle ground approach. Nr. Perry indicated that Staff believes that the ~edtum range approach la ~ore defensible than the first approach, and less defen- sible than the third approach. County ~lanager Dorrlll stated that this approach includes the compromise concept relating to alternate corridors and · credit would Page 29 Na~ch ~3. 1990 be given to 50~ of those people If some corridor trip could be taken other than those that are below the Level of Service. Mr. Perz-y stated that there Is also a concern relative to the Bonita Beach Road corridor that Is west of Vanderbtlt Drive, and noted that this Is presently at a deficient level. He reported that this megBent is currently funded in the Capital Improvement Element, but the Transportation Department is considering removing the funding for that project and relocating to other projects, due to the lack of funding on the ~ee County side. He remarked that this would put this section of P, or~ita ~ach Road In the deficient category, and a sora- torlum would have to be established there*. Nr. Perr~ stated that the medium approach identifies the fact that approximately 401~-45~ of the traffic using the impacted link begins or ends within the areas ss colored on the map, and the larger approach identifies spproxi~tely 80~ of the locations where the traffic is coming from or going to, using these links. He related that in the concurrency ordinance draft which Is going through the public hearing process, there is the built-in flexibility for the Commission to choose whatever Is most appropriate for a particular road segment Where the Ali's are needed, fie Informed that In the call of Vanderbllt B~ach Road or Bonita Beach Road where s very narrow approach is identified, and medium access concerns, there My be a ver~ narrow ASI. He stated tJ~ut, In the case of a larger arterial hIgb~ay with a greater surface area or a collector road ss beginnings L~d ends adjacent to arterials, there may be the third type of scope. He pointed out that there is ver~ little impact upon the City of Nsplee with the middle approach. He noted that Davis Blvd. corridor and the East Trail over]ap, and they would be affected by either were It created. He stated that both of these areas and the North Naples ares tn the larger approach encompass much, if not al! of the City of Naples, since it is a great attractor of traffic from the OO05.1 Page 30 March 13~ 1990 outlying areas of the County. Re related that when the Ctty approves an off]ce or commercial building, there are people from the outs]de co~lng to that particular loc&tion, and soae of the blame has to be put on the attractor as well aa the producer. He Indicated that the same example ~ay be applted to the Collier/Lee border. In answer to Co--lmmtoner Volpe, Nr. Perry informed that there are no par~ters In the Growth Hanagement Plan to establish ASIea, but there are general concepts, i.e. the balloon approach, but tn other cases where there Is no beginning and end of a roadway where the balloon approach stay be inappropriate, a different approach may be necessary. He indicated that the ordinance should be left without specific para~eters since different roads require different lustlflca- tlonm for these areas. Commissioner Shanahan questioned ~hether a plan amendment would be required If, I.e. the moderate approach Is chosen today, or does it become the standard? Hr. Perry advised that the application of the shape, size and scope of the ASI does not require any growth ~anage- merit plan a~endments, but if the Coulaslon directs Staff to place mlni~u~/~axl~us standards within the ordinance, Staff w111 prepare ~lch0 Co~-Imaloner ihanahan questioned whether a plan amendment would be requlrad if the district or corridor approach were selected? Nr. Perry informed that because the plan does not specify a mpectflc sppro&ch to be used, and to try ~nd adopt an ordinance that doem say It shall be measured by I slle on either side of the roadway, an ~ndment uy be required. Commissioner Hasae questioned whether the ASI would be alleviated If · ro~d systen were isproved In a certain area? Hr. Perry advised that after 1994, the four year wlndo~ shrinks to s three year windo~, but if the funding for that particular pro~ect is within the Capital I~provement Element, credit Is given for that particular are·, and the mor&toriu~ ~ould never go Into place. He stated that If funding beco- mes available six months into the ~oratorlu~, the moratorium ordinance Page 31 Hatch 13, 1990 ~m2d tl~n b~ re~aled, and everything ~ould go beck to normal. In anm~er to Coulesioner Volpe, Mr. Perry related that part of the con~ltant'~ ~co~ of ~ork ~s to Jdentlf~ those .ca.urea, that l~le~nted at a ~re reasonable approach ~y fix Intersection or add tu~ l~es, etc., ~hich could provide cap~clty In the ~t$~e. He Indicated t~t an l~r~e~nt of c~paclty at 10~ or 15~ ~y only one ~$tlo~l year, ~fo~e the situation get~ beck to where It He noted t~t the ~ale~ tax Isle ~s not a ~arantee that c~ be relied a~n, and the C~nty ~e to co. It and obligate to fix the ~oa~ay Jn o~de~ to take advantage of the concu~en~ CmJasione~ Vo]~ ca,led ~ttentJon to Option t2, to place a ~a- to~ a~nd those State ~oad me~nte which a~e deficient fo~ a ~r~od of tJa until a ~efe~endua can ~ held and the ~tcoae of the ea]e~ tax determined. He ~eet]oned why a ~rato~lua c~]d not ~ placed ~ these State ~oada until such t$~ that a funding a~ce ~dent~fJed? Hr. Litetnge~ stated that Jf that dec~ston was Mde, the p~ob%ea ~ the plan ~n~nte on A~J~ 24. He advised that tf these p~o~ectm a~e ]eft in the CIE, and deve]op~nt o~de~e continued to ts~ed wtth~t the identified funding e~rce ~o~ the aa]es tax ~enue, the County has committed to build those p~o~ectm. C~tsmioner 5sunders stated t~t he does ~t believe t~t Option · 1 la really a choice since he does ~t see h~ develo~nt orders c~ contln~ to ~ Issued on road seg~nte ~lth deficiencies ~lth the hope t~t t~ sales tax ~lll ~ appr~ed ~ the voters In Nove~r. He l~lcated t~t he feels t~t Option ~2 Is probably the only thing that s~uld ~ done at this ~int. lie noted that If Staff la directed to co~ ~ck to the Coulsston for consideration of a ~ratort~ ordt- ~nce, as ~ell as what other counties have done In ter~ of defining ~l's, and go ~lth Option a2, It does not preclude the ~ard at ~y ~lnt In tl~, when a road seg~nt ~co~e an Issue, to do needs to ~ done. He Indicated that this would give so~ flexibility ~t ~ld not require the County to laprove a road ~tth~t any f~dtng s~rce available as Option ~1 does. Page March 13, 1990 Hr. Alan Reynolds of Hlleon, Hiller, Barton, $oll & Peek, Inc. stated that a substantial nuaber of the tripe into Naples will be sade by p~ople who have their residences In the County and their employment tn the City, or are going to the City for ao~e other purpose. He commented that if Collier County imposes a ~oratorium unilaterally the City te under no obligation to likewise Impose this upon the City. He stated that the County le obligated to provide the earvicea and facilities at an acceptable level, and the City te the beneficiary, to a certain extent of the employeea who live in Collier County. He Indicated that if he were a resident of the City of Naples, and looking at this p4rticular issue, he might be encouraging the County to take a hard line atance on a ~oratorlum since it allows additional cap. city to be available for the City at the expense of the County. Hr. Nr~molde noted that the Executive Sumry Identifies ? or 8 different options and each has been dinieeed ae one that ia not viable for one reason or another. He indicated that the ~ain reason Is that it would require an amendment to the Growth ~nageMnt Plan, and noted that this ia not a valid reason not to have further discussions about so~e of the alternatives. He consented that gro.~th ~anageMnt and concurrency ere not issues that will go away any time soon, He said that ha does not feel that any of the options solve the problasm, and it will probably take a combination of all of the.. He atatad that the State Imposed growth ~anagement, but did not co.att to fund growth ~an&ge~ent, and n,,~ the County la left with the task of the lmple~entation. He Indicated that whether it ia the sales tax, ad valorem taxes, etc., growth ~anages~ent cannot be lmpoaed without the co--lt~ent to fund lt. He stated that If Option #2 ia a foregone conclusion, Option tl should also be expanded and endorsed by the Co--lesion to co--it and fund growth ~anageaent. Hr. Reynolds provided a hand out to the Conieeton (not provided to the Clerk"a Office) describing how an AS! ~ay be eetabltehad. Ha noted that he also presented this to the Collier County Planning Co~leelon a fe~ weeks ago. Ha stated that he believes that Page 33 ~ Hatch 13, 1990 sta.~tarda should 134 placed In the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance mo that the general extent of the A$I*I can be forcasted. He suggested that thio be considered aa an alternative. Hr. ReTnolds indicated that Hr. Perr~ identified three techniques for Identifying the ASI*I, and suggested that collector and arterial roads be treated differently since they have different criteria. He indicated that there should be different ne thodology for an arterial road, i.e. State road versus a County collector Road. Commissioner Sounders stated that If there lo a complete nora- torlum on new construction in Collier County there will still be more and more traffic on those roads from Ft. Laudardale, Ft. I~tero, otc.. He noted that he does not believe that it lo fair to i~enallze o large area of prolP~rty owners because of increased traffic on those State Roads. He noted that he belleve8 there vfould be Justification If an ASI ts defined In a narrow fashion around the 8tats Roads. Re affirned that tf Option ~2 to selected, and a segekent falls below the itandards, the Commission will then have to n~lce the decision to either raise rtve- nu~s, e~t up a taxing district, otc. Hr, Perry/ Informed that he has reviewed the language aa suggested by Hr. Re~nolda, and noted that from a traffic analysis Itandpolnt, his numbers do not atop the degradation of the Level Of Service and the roads continue to get worse. Hr. Oeorge Keller coeueented that ha understands that itnce there are an ~any units on the books, the County lo obligated to provide the facilitlos for those units, a~d if they ara not provided, &d valorem taxes will need to be Increased to take care of them. He indicated that he does not believe that the State Legislature can impose thio on the County. He stated that predicating decisions on the salel tax to ridiculous. He questioned whether the County lo responsible to pro- vide the Infrastructure for all the units that are on the books today? County Attorney Cuyler advised that it is not how nan¥ units have been approved, but rather the impact of the development orders that have been issued on the roadway, and In that case, the infrastructure Page 34 #aroh 1:~ SgQO hal to be there concurrent with those deve]opaent orderm. He noted that development orders can continue to be 18sued regardless of the nunber of approved POD's as long as the Lave! Of Service Is maintained for that infrastructure orJ the roa~aya. Hr. Keller stated that he doe. not believe that Collier County has even begun to analyze what the Iapact fees should be to provide for develol~aent. Re noted that in the case of Davis Boulevard, It $3,000 p~r unit was charged, there would be no problea, and the sue applies to all ne~ develops~ent on Narco and Narco Shores. Re added that growth mhould pay for growth. Hr. Bill Barton explained that the State of Florida has ~ade the decision to lapo~e the growth ~anage~ent system on Collier County. He Indicated that they have also ~ade the decision to default on their responsibilities to fund their ~ State Roads, and therefore, passed along a taxing Issue to the County and the City. He remarked that the decision that the Co. lesion sakes relative to State roads will have a draaattc aspect on Collier County. Be stated that the County ~ust fund growth unageaent, and the State Roads cannot be excluded. Be said that to create ~oratorluss around State Roads will not solve the problems for a very long period, and noted that If those funds are not found by the County, the moratortuas will be Indefen- sible In court, and they will have to be ellatnatsd. Hr. Barton stated that If the citizens of the coountty ars really opposed to funding growth unage~nt, he believes that when they realize 127 square al]es will be affected by the aoratorlua, he feels that they will vote differently on the various ts~es at the polls In November. Hr. Barton reported that the ANrIcan Association of State ~igt~ay And Transportation Officials (ASHTO) recently cor~ucted a nation-wide study that sho~a that the volu~e of traffic on highways Is Increasing at the rate of 5X per year, excluding growth factors. He noted that sore people own cars, and transportation lo aovJng away free rail and to truck, and transportation Is moving away from buses Harch 13, 1990 ~nd trains to the suto~blle. Ha explained that he feels the 5~ figure is quite 1o~ In Collier County, since regardless of what hap- pens In growth, the tourlas will continue to Increase. In addition, he Indicated that ~any of the roads In the soratorlum area will con- tInue to b~ affected by l~e County growth, He noted that the City of Naples .ay or ~ay not enter Into an tnterlocal agreement and their continued Issuance of developlent orders will continue to III)act those roads. He remarked that since DRI's are exespt, they will continue to lspact the roads. Xe advised that a ioratorlml of any kind will not stop the increased areas of ASI'a; the tspact fees for the moratorlusl area will b~ eliainated, resulting In a decrease In the sources of revenue which are being anticipated to lest the Capital Iaprove~ent Ble-.ent; the roads continue to get worse which increases the area of ASlfs, and reduces further the Income from lspact fees. Re stated that If construction of those roads are delayed for several years, It can be assured that the dollars that are earaarked tn the Capital lmproveMnt Element today w111 be drasatlcally Increased through the inflation process. Hr. Barton explained that he believes the Coutaston needs to .~ake a decision to co--it to growth .~lnage~ent, and rely on the sales tax passing, he, ever, tn order to fall safe, Staff should advise during the next three ~onths ho~ these lsprove~ents lay be funded In the event that the salsa tax does nnt psis. Coauilssioner Saunders stated that Sr. Barton's couents are elo- quent and persuasive, but he disagrees. H~ noted that It sounds great to say that the County Is going to fund growth lanageaent, but there are only a couple of ways to do this: the local option sales tax, and If that falls, possibly other funding sechanla-- free the state, and If that does not work, the only other alternative Is ad valorem tues. He indicated that he believes that In the real world, the County w111 be required to adopt a ~oratortus ordinance, and to either tlpose a Ioratorlu~, or finding a funding source. He stated that he Il suggesting that the Coulasion allow the greatest degree of flexlbI- Page 36 O00GO Narch 13, 2990 ]lty in the way the ordinance wJl! be drafted. Nr. Barton stated that his concern is that the Ce.mission Is about to esbark upon taking steps of a ~oretorJum, and this will be the cos- · ence.ent of plunging collier County Into a governmental induced recession. He noted that the ]argero .~re successful developers who can develop the Pelican Bays, Lely Resorts, and the Grey Oaks will find better places to develop with less risks. Attorney 3tm Scarborough, representing k'hJaperlng Pines, Znc., indicated that he concurs with Hr. Barton'. re~arks relating to the philosophy of adopting ~oratoriusa. Re stated that he feels that the adoption of a ~oratorius Is the .sst drastic step that the Cosmisslon should consider. He Indicated that the DCA is dictating specifics as to ~ Collier County's Plan will be adopted, and the State refuses to fund Its ~ obligations. Re advised that he feels that Staff's Option ~6 is not necessarily an unreasonable alternative. He noted that he would rather be in court with the State of Florida rather than with the land owners who have better cause to be disturbed, if the State Is not forced to take asea ~eaeure of Its responsibility. He said that he feels that consideration should be given to the possibi- lity of Incorporating an a~nd~ent to the Plan that is based upon seas funding through the State for the required infrastructure. He noted that if the County does not allow the Level of Service to deteriorate, the State will never spend any ~oney. Attorney Scarborough renarked that the Concurrency Ordinance as presently drafted states that no development orders wll! be Issued unless the Infrastructure ts In place. Re stated that lo his opinion, the only thing the ~oratoriu~ would do, would be to cast In concrete ~h~t the ASI was, and this Is so, thing that Staff did not want to do. He said that the County la not obligating Itself by falling to enact a ~oratorlu~, or to construct laprovem~nta to the State roads unless specific d~velopment orders are approved baaed upon those roads being completed within the 5-Year Road Improvement Plan. He stated that he O00ol March 15, 1990 would lika to ese clear direction from the Couleelon to the Staff to explore alternative sources, and squeeze as nuch am possible out of the State. Mr. Sewell Corkran stated that tf the Intent and ~urpose of the Public Facilities Ordinance had been In place the past 5-10 years, there would be os discussion today of a aoratorJue. He stated that when a con~oeJnlua has been coapleted, closings are nade, the new occupants co~e tn and turn on the w&ter, tt should be there. He noted that when these sam folks get Into their cars and go out to drive, the~ should be able to be utilize roads that are in reasonably good condition. He said the facilities ~ust be there and ready when they need to be used. He stated tha~ the honey for the facilities as iden- tified In the ordinance should be directed I~f nanagelent Into contracts to deliver the facilities Io th&t they are available. He stated that he Is confident that the Conalsslon and the coemunlty will cam up with the necessar~ funding, and his plea Is that when the road portion of the ordinance ts being considered, the public Interest will be kept in lind. es, Deput~F Clerk McClenath~n replaced Depu~l, Clerk at this tA~ else Couissloner Saunders noted there are two very extren~ approaches, the first of which Is to continue approving developnent orders which will result In funding reade for which there is no funding source. This, he said, would be Irresponsible. He said the other approach Is to utilize this Issue as a nechanlee to establish a very broad, almost county-wide, aoratorlun. This, he continued, veould be Irresponsible also. Co,,~tsstoner Iaunders indicated the only available approach In hie opinion is to go with option No. 2, and prepare sn ordinance which, in effect, could be utilized to inpose a ~or&torlu~ In a very narro~ area around stats roads, and to direct staff to define the areas of signi- ficant lapact on state roads as narrmely as Is reasonable, recognizing that state roads are a little different than county roads. Page 38 March 13, 1990 Commissioner Seundare continued by laying that the county hal not been prepared In the last several years to fund state roads. Co~lon4r Saunderl moved, that Itaff concept Type Il, I#diun Coverag~ AS! ~p, ~ a~~; to ~ a ~ratorL~ ord~e ~, ~ to dtr~ t~ otaff to ~fl~ ~ ~ea of oJ~lf~c~t ~ a ~ ~ ~ea. ~otsetoner Vol~ co~nted t~t the ~ard of C~ty ~tss~oners ts concerned a~t causing a disturbance tn the con- ~lty ~cause the words "deferral" and "~ratorSun' do have negative concepts. He stated he feels ~t ~e tentative to get a consultant on ~ard aa e~n as ~eslble, tn order to get a re.ri to the ~ard regarding the a~unt o~ re~nlng capacity on state road Hr. ~eff Per~ Indicated that the contract .Ill be delivere~ to the Tr~e~rtatlon ~ard this date, ~d as soon as tt Is revl~ed and el~d, the consult~C ~1~ ~ under contract. Co~testoner Vol~ t~tred whether the consultant Is re~tred to co~ ~ck to the ~ard within a tt~ para. tar and Hr. Per~ responded t~re are eo~ tJ~ ~tdel~nes tn the contract. Cowry Attorney Cuy~er re~rked that Jf the County advertises par- tJcular areas they will not ~ all--ed to expand those areae~ they .~11 ~ all.ed to reduce the areas, and therefore, the ~ard should not ~.~ee restrictions on the~elves. County Attorn~ Cuyler idvl~ed thlt If the ~rea Il In excess of of land In the county, night hearings ~ill be tn order; h~er, ~ less, notices to the probity ~ers will have to ~ len~. Co~lllloner Vol~ stated that the County should asiu~i It Is ~re th~ 5~, a~d County Attorney Cuyler Indicated that the County le going to notify the pro~rty ~ers and ~ve night ~etlngs trregard/ell. ~e problei Is, he indicated, the idvertiling re~lre~ntl Ire dif- ferent de.riding on what decillon the ~ard ~kee. Co~l~sJoner Volpe inquired further a~ut the itudy ~d noted option Xo. 2 Is t~ o~n-ended and does not ~11~ for al~er~tlve~, ~ltlng for the ou~co~ of the lale~ t~ ~eferen~. He ~nde~ed Page 39 O0(}G3 Narch 13, 1990 there lea Nay to m~ke thil option I bit ~ore general, Coulemloner Saunders Indicated that his ortglr~! intention ts to have a ~oratortu~ on state road segments until avail&bls to correct the deficiency. To force a focus on this the tl~ limit could ~ shortened, rather th~ walt ~tll N~e~ber? Nr. Perry Indicated a ~ssible source of revenue ~y co~e out of t~ ~gt~lature, prior to that tl~, and Co~tmsloner Volpe Indicated they need to cospress the tl~ to 45-60 d~ys. Coulmmioner $~n ~emttoned ~at the alternative f~ds are · ~ m~ld he ~ould r~ther not rely on th~ ~glsl~ture, ~hlch ~y be an tllumlve plan. Co~lssloner Vol~ indicated he does not ~nt the out- co~ to ~It the ~glmlature~s action either. Co~lmmloner S~unders Indicated that the ~re rem~nmlble ~ctton Is option No. l, ~nd feels It ~111 se~e the citizens of Collier cowry ~st. Couimmloner ~klng the greatest Impact is the pl~ on the right, Indicating the first ~p of the three on Co~lssloner Volpe reslnded Co~lmsloner H~sme that ~ch of tho trlfftc on the North ~ [~st Tr~ll is ~ople ~ ~re p~mstng thr~gh. Therefore, he continued, the residents of Collier C~nty ~y be pena- lized for 10~ of the ~torlng public. Co~lmsloner O~lght Indicated she ~ould like to see the ~tion broken Into t~o (l) parts~ ~ first to ~ ~hether or not the board · gre~m on a ~ratorl~, ~d the second to ~, the selection of one of the three ~ps. ~.~m t~ ~i~ him ~tla. to ~t ~ ~ II ~lu Co~lmmloner S~unders questioned If this im the ~p thlt ~111 be used for A~l's ~round st~t~ roads that ~re deficient or ~tentlally deficient? ~ olll for t~ ~mtion, ~g~ 40 kflol~ le r~ ~ n ot~r C~ty Attorney Cuyler indicated that his office ~111 evaluate the r~$re~nte a~d prepare the necee~a~ decantation to bring back to the ~erd at 4 ~bllc ~earlng. C~$ii~oner Vo]~ ~t~cted C~nt~ Attorne~ ~ler to f~nd out the r~lre~nt~ regarding ~bllc BearSnge and pr~lde that lnfor- ~t~ to the ~r, LStmtnger l~$clted thit ~nlta Beach Road 1~ ~rrentl~ t~ed ~n the CI~ ~t $~ conlldered to ~ the County'l ~rtlon d~elo~nt order~ ~lll ~ lilued on the a~mu~pclon that the road going to ~ Improved. He ~elt~oned ~f the Count~ 1~ obligated to ~e that Jm~rove~nt If ~l Count~ ~1 unable or un~l12$ng to ~et theSr ~rtlon of the conlt~ct$on? C~ ~nager ~rrtll itated t~t th~l Itel doee not ~ve ~artng on Bonita ~ch Road, lm St 1~ not a ~tate road. Co~lme~oner ~a~ie itated he th~ght St dependi on ~hether Count~ le goSng to ~ork ~$th CollSer C~t~. Co~$1eloner Volpe Snd~cited thit ~ d~lcumllon I~ut ~ ASI ar~d ~nitl ~lch Ro~d le Inappropriate It th$l tike. lt~ C~ty ~nager Dorrill indicated t~t the Co~Aom~onerm need to set a ~te for a ~orkohop In accordance Mlth the ocheduled ~bltc Bearing on April 3, 1990, to con8lder ~ndator~ garbage collection. Conl~etoner Saunders questioned If it 1~ ~o~ible to work~hop off for a couple of weeko becmuoe of the he8~ upcoming mgen- dss. Mr. ~rrtll oatd there ~111 ~ a ~ctflc vote needed on thio Page O00G5 Public Bearing on Aprl! 3, and tt has been advertised as r~ch0 ~~lg=imom~ll, th~tth~t~r~ahopfo~th~l~u~mtor~ ~11~ ~~ ~ ~1~ ~ ~ch 20, Nr. ~rrlll lndicate~ to the ~ard that this agreement is to ~slst the County In the ~ach ren~rls~nt pro~ect. ~e told the ~tmsio~rs the ]an~age of this agree~nt ~as ~de ~ the City's pr~l~s ~lnlstratlon, and Is reflected In this year~s ~dget. 00066 Page 42 Harch 13, 1990 ~ W'IT~[ I~. DAVID I~ZLLTAJ~ R~O~INO ~ O~ ~ O~ZON David ~llllass of Florida Atlantic ~lverslty to provide the Co~lsslon with an ~nalysis of th~ ~rc~ntag~ of sales t~ paid by ~t-of-c~nty residents and to ~k~ sales tax projections ~er the n~t 10 1~ ~1~ tnfrutnc~e nles t~ b a~d In the mt of Page 43 March 13, 1990 90-124/126~ 90,1:29/132.* AND C-1 - ~~ tht ~get ~ntl 90-124/126; 90-12 - ~~ m~d cs~rlodu~un/mouoly, that B~dget Amendment Resolution 90-12 be o6op~od. Page 44 ~a~ch ~3~ ~::/- II~SO~2TIOI IlO. 90-155 REAPPOINTING I(R. PAUT, CHZVJLLZEIt AID APPOZNTI]I~ ~'~r. ' ~ C. (]UTZI~LLI3~, ~R. TO T~E NATZR i(&IA(IIXEXT &DVISORT BOARD -- NS. SUe Yilson, Administrative A~sJstant to the Board, advised that two (2) terem expired on th~ ~Ater 14anagement Advisory Board as of Pebruary 26, 1990. Therefore, aha aaid, appotnt~nta or reappoint- lents need to be lade, adding that staff recommends the reappolntment of both Mr. Mles and Mr. Chevalier. Colualssloner Shanahan reco~Jiended that Hr. Edwin C. Outzwlller, Jr. replace Hr. Bo~lee who baa aerved for 3 years. Commissioner Volpe inquired if CommlaaJoner Shanahan knel~ both men and ha anmeered affir~tlvel¥. Colllleloner Ih4z~hmn loved, leconded I~ Col~teltoner Volpe and clrrled~m~n~Mo~llT, that lteeolutlon 90-155 appointing I~. Outzwtller, ~r. elm ~l~F~o~ntlng I~. Chevll~er to the Ititer ~t ldvtloz~ 00077 Page 45 Hatch 13, ~ggo Ztem ~12B I1~~01 ]10. 90-156 ~PPOIITZ]IG ~. I~IG B~ON TO ~ ~ ~ ~. Sue Filson, Administrative laalst~t to the Board, advised t~t there Is a vacancy on the Or~nd ~ater Protection TecMlcal Uvtmou Coulttee and an ap~intment needs to ~ ~de, adding that Staff reco~nds that l~tng L. ~rzon ~ ap~tnted. 00O';'.9 Page 46 1990 O DV&C&TXO TO Bg FRO :mrr 24 - 22, 2090 - APPRO ZD Ms. Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the Board, stated that the Budget Director is requesting that the Board he au·liable the week of June 18 - 22, for Budget Workshops in preparation of ·dopting the millage rate. Commissioner Hasse Sndic·ted July 3 thru 24th would seem to be appropriate. Contssioner Volpe said there are many Important issues and the entire Board should not be on vac·tlon at one time, but could neet throughout the sumr with a maJortty In ·ttend·nce. And, he con- tinued, if the Board goes on v·c·tion, they will loose four Tuesd·ys Jn· ro~ where no officl·l ·ctlon will be t·ken. Commissioner Goodnlght stated th·t Lee County does not t·ke time off for vacation, but their attend·mca during the year h·s not been good. She said she attributes the successful ·ttend·nce of the Bo·rd to the fact th·t they t·ke a vacation and kno~ when it to far enough :n a:v&=¢~ ~ s¢~du]es can be ·rr·nged by st·ff. ~tssion~F ~mdnlght moved, seconded by Commissioner Shannhnn 22, I~0. lte~#12D cou~rr~ &YTOJ~EY TO EXPLORE ALL POSSIBLE INP~'T FEE~ A~D PROC~ED~TH County Attorney Cuyler In&lc·ted to the Bo·rd he circulated a memo (no coi)y to Clerk to the Board} with attachments which outlines two Impact fees that are common throughout the state: EJ4S fees and Law Enforcement Fees. He indicated his office ts prepared to dr·fi ordt- ~ances with some assistance from experts in that ·re·. County Attorney Cuyler continued by saying that a study regarding · ne~ administration and governmental services Impact fees sho~ed that a nexus could not be dra~m between roads and those types of facilities, adding that this should be dons by · firm with expertise 00081 Hatch 13, 1990 ~: in that area, and, If the Board t· interested in ~oving quickly, the firm of Henderson & Young, specifically Randy Young, who did the last two ordinances, could be contacted. He indicated that the Board can w·ive the bid requirements or send out for proposals. Comissioner Shah·has Indicated that he feels the county needs to collect Jap·ct fees wherever and whenever they can be collected, so this option needs to be explored to the naxi~umo Comissionsr Volpe discussed · study he read celled "P·ylng for Florida's Growth' which was a survey of use and impact fees. He said there are other impact fees such as drainage, schools, se~er, libraries and beaches, as well as other impact fees. County Attorney Cuyler indicated that his office Is prepared to ~ork on a ~&xlsum of two Impact fee ordinances at attse and wants to · kno~ which ones the board would prefer. Co--Is·loner Volp~ reit·rated that l~pact fees need to be collected where possible to pay for growth. ~ssioner ih~lmn moved, seconded b~ Co~lw·ton~r am·tiers ? .... ¢~rrle~ ~n~ni~o~sly, that Co~nt~ lttorne~ Cycler proceed with th~ peratto~ of draft ordinances for t~pact fee· for !0~ and :. ~n~or~e~o~t and to ~k the assistance of Henderson and Young and ,~: brin~ ~ l~ck to the Board. · ,,,,Co~lealoner Ooodntght ~md, seconded b~Co~temioner ~ ~d carried unanimously, that the follo~ing the Consent ~ he aP1~'ove4 ~n~/or 1. Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as security to guarantee completion of the subdivision improvements. Authorize the recording of the Final Plat of Briarwood Plaza. Authorize the Chairman to execute the construction and ~lntenance agreement. That no Certificates of Occupahc¥ be granted until the required lmprovementm have received preliminary acceptance. Page 48 Accept the Irrevocable ~etter of Credit (Poeted) security for ~atntenance of the infrastructure until the Board of County Conlssloners grants final acceptance of all Improvements. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Halntenance Agreement for Preliminary Accoptance and Resolution authorizing preliminary acceptance. Prelimtnar~ acceptance of t~rove~nts will not becose effective until water and sewer facilities have been conveyed to Collier County ~ater-Sewer District. see Rl~O~fl011 ~C). 90-15a AFPROVING TI~ RECORDZIG O, TI~ ,ZNAL PLAT O, .~&~~m ~ GJL4J'TZJrG OY I:~ZLIM/NA,.R'YACCKP'TAHCE C), TKEROA. DMAY, 1. Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit as security for ~tntenance of the infrastructure until the Board of County Couleelonera grants final acceptance of all Improvements. 2o Authorize the recording of the final plat of 'Gatee Hills'. 3. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Halntenance Agreement for Preliminary Acceptance and Resolution authorizing preliminary acceptance. 4. Preltsinary acceptance of the leprovements will not become effective until water and seteer facilities have been conveyed to Collier County ~ater-$e~eer District. Zt~ ~ON lC). 90-1S9 Z~:~ZDZN43 ~OR &SS~SS14g31~ O' LZ~ ZN OR3:~E~ TO See age. /I~SOZ4~ZO~ NO. 90-161 FROVIDIXG ,OR ASSESSt~NT O, LIE31 IN ORD~IK TO /~ZC~3t~ EXI~B~F.D BY TBZ COUNTY TO ABAI~ ~IUZSAXCI ON TOT 42, See Page 49 000S3 Hatch 13, 1990 ~,: .... ~ FUW~ ~ ~f ~ COUW~ TO ABATg MUZSAWC~ OM LOT 8, BLOCK ': 3~3, ~ ]WE&CHUMXT 22, MXL~AJ~ ~,,.]KV~Sr .TR. ItE~3Z~fZOM I0. 90-164 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMKFF OF LZER IN ORDER TO ~ ~ EXI~NDKD BT TR~ COUNTY TO ABATE NUISAMCE OR LOT 31, LELY CCmWTI~ cT,~rs, pAx~n~ro ~ s~rrzow, A. PA~r;, (3REGa Xtem #14All See Pagem~ Xtem t14A12 R~4Yf~fXOW MO 90-168 FROHXBXTXMG TRUCE~ AMD COMMY~XAL V~ZCLt9 BAVZMO & BATED LOAD-C~WG CAPACITY lW KXCESS OF OW~ (1) TOW ~ROM ~ OW POMI:'~I LAA~ B~ GOODLZTT~-~ ROAD ~ SeePage ~OM MO 90-169 ~POXMTXMG AND AOTHORZZZNG T~ TP~IJ~POl~fATXOW .~VI:CI~DM/NI~TO~ ~ DZRr~--~TOR TO B:X~CDT~RL~MZTH ~'T.,AR'~A,9 TlgS ADOFT-A-ROAD Flt0~ COORD~M&TOR See Page ~_ ~_ ~. ~ / Page 50 March :~, lggo K&TERAID SEIeZ3K FACILITIES ACCI~TAJ~'~ IK:)R DgAOV/LLI LAJ~ CLUB, A 1. The ~lorida Depart~nt of Envtron~nta] Repletion furnlshe~ a letter approving the water distribution systea for service and the bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements. The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a letter authorizing to place the ae~er system into service. The fire flo~ requirements of the project have been satisfied and the Firs District furnishes · letter accepting the fire hydrants for ownership and maintenance. The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a letter placing the s~ar ~ystsm into eervtce and authorizing the water system Into service. Bacteriological testing hms mat the County's requirements. The fire flc~ requirements of the project have been satisfied and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrants for mensrmhlp and smintenancs. 0~ ~o, ,~,B ,'-g.. ~ .nd so. ~.g.. ~% ~/' ~'/~ The Florida Departsent of Environmental Regulation furnishes · letter authorizing to place the sewer system Into service and approving the water distribution system for service. Bacteriological testing has met the county's requirements, The fire flo~ requirements of the project have been satisfied and the Fire District furnishes · letter accepting the fire-hydrants for o~nsrshlp and maintenance. 00O85 Ma:'~h :t:~ :tgg0 ~gl! notice bering been pub]lehed in the ~(sp]el Daily N~e on ~eb~ary 2 1990, ae evidenced b~ Aff~davit of Publication f~led w~th the Clerk, bids ~ere received.for Bid ~90-1526 for the hauling ot sludge to a final disposal site, unti~ 2:30 P.N., February 21, 1990. Xtmm #14~2 Xtmm #14M1 lqTB~XO EffJJXIKZ TO CC~XDKR ADOI*TXOM Oil ORDXMAMCE$ AMZWDXMG COLLX~ COUF~Y C~D~ JO 77-~2 r0R SEPARATE TAXXMG OlrXTS ~ LXOHTXI~ ArO Itel ~ldXl Page 52 March I3, 1990 RZ:SOLaTX0g 00-170 Ai'POXITXIG ~ 110iqIXI:RAJIX) RIAPPOXITXIG BJJE:BARA Xtra #1431 po. DA'~ 253 - 254 02/09/90 250 - 251 395 258 Xt~m#143~ 02/09/g0 02/27/90 02/27/90 135 Oi/l?/go 14g - 152 02/22/90 154 - 156 02/2T/go - 03/01/90 1989-108 02/20/00 There b~lng no objection, the follo~Ing miscellaneous correspon- dence w~m filed and/or referred to t~ var:Gus departments as indi- cated )~so to All Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Reclpleflte d~ted 2/27/90 from T.,ewla O. Burnalde, Jr., Director DCA with aubJect Federal Flacal Year I990 HouaIng Rehabilitation Workshop. xc: flied. DCA, Florida Small Cities Community Development Block Grant Program Notice of Workshop. xc: Nell Dorrlll; Frank Bruttl Start hltslnger; and flied. letter dated 2/26/90 to BCC Chairman re: Collier County Police Traffic Services Program/Project #90-O4-K-315-35 from Page 53 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. March l~; lggo Gordon Outhrie, Director, DCA. xc: Nell DorrlII; Don Hunter; and filed. DCA, Division of E~ergency Management, Bureau of Public Safety Hanage~ent Grant Adjustment Notice. xc: Nell Dorrlll; Say Reardon; Ken Plneau; and filed. Letter dated 2/2?/90 to BCC Chairman re Modification No. 1, Contract No. 90-LP-22-09-2~-210 from Paul Bradahaw, Director, Division of Resource Planning & Management, DCA. xc: Nell Dorrlll; Frank Brutt; Start Lltslnger; and filed. Letter dated 3/1/90 from the Department of the Army, to Mr. Ken Humtston, Costal Engineering Consultants, Inc., Collier County to BCC re permit instrument, xc: Hell Dorrlll; George Archibald; and filed. Letter dated 2/20/90 to Chairman Hesse re Hazardous Waste Collection Center Grant Program from DER. xc: Nell Dorrlll; Bill Lorenz; Frank Brutt, 2/28/90; and flied. Notice of Proposed Rule and Hula,eking dated 2/23/90 from DER. xc: Hell Dorrlll; Frank Bruit; and filed. Order Granting Continuance end placing file in abatement from Veronica Donnelly, Hearing Officer, Division of Administrative HearinGs re Case #flg-I841DRI, DCA vs. BCC. xc: Ken Cuyler; and filed. Letter dated 2/26/90 to Handcrafted Homes, ~nc. of Zee County re Administrative Approval of Permit Nuiber: C0-235 and Permittee WaN: Robert C. and Shirley M. As~ue, from Tony McWeal, Bureau of Coastal Engineering & Regulation, DNR. xc: Nell Dorrlll; Frank Bruit; and filed. letter dated 1/31/90 to Kenneth K. flumlaton, P.E., Costal Engineering Consultants, Inc., from Tony McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Costal Engineering and Regulation, Division of Beaches and Shores, DNR, re Governor and Cabinet Permit Number: DB$ 88-208 CO, Permittee'a Name: Collier County County Board of Couleeloners. xc: filed. Florida Transportation Couisalon Agenda for March 8, 1990. xc: flied. Collier County Fire Consolidation Study Group Agenda for 2/22/90, 3/8/90, Minutes of 2/8/90 and Minority Report. XC: filed. Notice to Owner dated 2/22/90 re ~aterlala furnished by Krehllng Industries, Inc. for Improvements of the United Telephone Systems Building, 2311 Orange Blossom Drive under an order given by N. W. Beaudoln & Sons, Inc. xc: Nell Dorrlll; Skip Camp; $ohn Yonkosky; and filed. Notice to O~ner, H. D. Rutledge, dated 3/2/90, re ~aterials furnished by Florida Contractor Rentals & Salem, Inc. for the Collier Health Services Bulldlng under an order given by BCH Mechanical. xc: Nell D~rrill; Skip Ca~rp; 3ohs Yonkosky; and filed. Notice of Public Nearing: Department of Health Rehabilitative Services. Rule Title: E~ergency Itedical Servtcea. Rule Number: 10D-66. xc: Nell Dorrlll; Jay Reardon; and flied. Notice of Public Meeting re AnnounceNnt of two DCA public ~eetlngm to all interested persons, Wednesday, 3/14/90. xc: Wail Dorrll]; Start Litstngerl and flied. Hatch 23, 1990 10. Re.slutish No. C-1990/01~ fron Deerfield Beech dated 2/~/90 re Jnt~rotat~ ,lloc, tlon of gr,nt fund,, sc: Net] Ken Cu¥1er; and tiled, 19. Twentieth Judicial CircuJt Court Case #88-2173-CA-O2, Judge Hugh D. Hayes. Tacksusrk, Ltd., Plantitt vi. Terence Fitzgerald. Order appointing mediator, xc: filed. 20. Hotion, ~otice and Judgo~nt of Dlsaissal re Case 8?-2??2-CA-01-~LB, Sandra Crockett Pierce, Plant,fl vs. Lo~l~ John Brenner and Sunbrella Homes, Inc., Defendant. xc: Ken Cuyler; and ti]ed. C~ty ~ger ~rrJll J~Jcated that the last ti, there was a dlm~set~ re a Sales Tax referendun, Coo~ss~oner Sanders ~de a n~r of r~ests for additional Jnfor~tlon as well as establishing a ~ce of ~ento. Part of the r~uest, he continued, Js for a day ~r~ ~d a nlght ~bllc hearing will ~ scheduled as a re~lt t~ ~rkshop. Hr. ~rrlll indicated t~t the Coulssion 1m~med ~eetlone as~clat~ with the prior pre.entatlon, ~n partl~lar the length of tJ~ which is pro~sed to ~ 10 years, and the a~t of ~ pro~d to ~ a tull cent. The ~olc list of projects, ~ con- tJnu~, is schools and the ten year capital Jmpr~e~nt needs, which are ,175 ~1111on including county and state roads, ~allm, law enfor- ce~nt facilitlem, and ~ach re~rJeh~nt. Hr. ~rrlll l~lcated the purc~se of the sensitive lands through the ~ ~UST s~u~d ~ discussed at the publlc hearing. Dlocretlo~ 1te~ need to ~ o;~ the list and eh~d ~ part of the refere~ so the ~ople kn~ ~hat they are votlng for, he sa~d. He ~ld t~ priory reason for this referendu~ le to replace ad valoren tums with a sales t~ and to schedule the referendum for th~s fall. Hr. ~rrlll said t~t he tried to tncor~rate the ~ coot avoldance as part of the referehdun which was in a ~tion ~e ~ Co~$eeloner 5sunders the last rise thio ires ~ao dJocumoed. Co~lseloner Vol~ inquired 1f any action will ~ t~en at ~ett~ ~ Hr. ~rrlll lndlcated the action he ho~s to receive ~ to OOO89 Page 55 Hatch 13, 1990 give the County Hanager's Office further direction. Assistant County Hansgsr HcLeeore said that the males tax cossit- tee has developed a plan that will achieve everyone's goals and will b~ a balanced prograa that the co..m~nlty can accept for s referendos in ~htch ali interests will be served. He outlined the benefits as follows: 1. Funding of the growth s~anage~ent plan. 2. Quality of life standards in the comsmnity being aain- tsined0 30 Funding of Non-CIE projects. 4. Benefits of ~onetary savings. Be said If this plan is equated to the alternative of property taxes and/or assess~nts there will be a relief of $263 nlllton, and, he continued, the opportunity to reduce the one alii fund by 886,300,000 is gained by stabilizing the cap at 812 ·lllion. In addi- tion, he said, constmption of public dollars ~hen using cash flow var- mss twenty-five (25) year bonds for school i·prove~nts a~rants to a $230 alllton s~vi~gs and ~o by using cash flow free sales tax rather than · twenty (20) year bond, another $120 million could be saved for · cunulatlve total of $?00 ·1111on. Hr. 14cI~ore indicated that the costs related to using the sales tax will be $541 ·llllon and 28~ should be deducted for the portion Imld by non-residents of Collier County, which leaves the total out- of-pocket expenses to the citizens of the county at spproxiaately $390 million. In teru of a net benefit gained, the qualitative issues will be acco·pllshed and the qu&lity of life In Collier County w111 be ~alntained. Co-~tssloner Hasse suggested that at the March 24th ~etlng the followlog lteas should be discussed; 1. The tourist development tax. 2. The 5 and 5 year referendtm option. 3. Expenditure of ~oney if the ~eferendu· passes. Coamissioner Hesse suggested the Sepia·bar primary for the Tourist Development Tax and the November prlnary for the one cent sales tax. Co~lssloner S~nahan reiterated the re.eats of Coulsstoner regarding the 28~ being verified, as presented O00DO Page ~6 ~? ~ #arch 13, lggo ~.i:! presentation, the Tourist Development Tax being · part of a package subject to a vote In September, and to hear additional discussion on the 5 year/5 year referendum option plan. Co-~lesioner ihanahan requested that Narco Island be exempt from the Tourist Development Tmx because their items are already fundpd. Nr. NcL~ore indicated that hie concern Is that the revenue fron the t~x might be overstated, and the county will have to be very care- ful not to over spend in order to keep reserves at the rata discussed. · ~. He continued that he does not see ho~ the tim rrm could be lees than ten years. At the end of 10 years, he said, the county will be beck on a cash flo~ basis. Co-~Iesloner Volpe stated that ha feels this ts really planning for the future, because, as he understands the proposal, the 'crunch' will co~e in the 6th, ?th, end 8th years, and the County needs to be usured that the funds will be available at that tiN. Nr. Nc~e~ore indicated that he will ~ake the chart available at the public hearing and said there will be t~o 'crunch' periods, adding that the first will be l~dlately, and the peak will he In the ?th year because of early project delays, which will bulge In the second ftys year period. ~e Indicated that tt will take 10 years of revenues to solve the problems. Co--leeloner Yelps questioned the earlier 3 year budget, and Mr. · .~<' NcLe~ore indicated that ha thinks the 3 year 'scenario' is on the ~:i b~sie of renewal, if needed, ~,ot ae · total ~easure. Nr. HcL~ore said he feels that everyone should understands ho~ this is going to happen, and cited an example with $30 nilllon in pro- ~ects being updated to Include ne~ road segments coning up next south. Ce.missioner Yelps questioned whether operating and ~atntenance costs have been included, and Hr. HcLe~ore assured him those costs will be included, and added that the cost Involved in building Jails ties into the correction study due to the operating costs for these facilities. He continued, saying, because of cost, he supports 00091 ~rch 13, 1990 finding alternative methods of Incarceration. Hr. Dudley Goodlette, Chatlman of the Se]es Tax Coutttee, thanked the commission, the school board, the city council of Naples and Everglades for selecting those who had the opportunity to serve. He / consented on the referendum of the bed ~ax or tourist development t~ that the conittee recomnds for referendum in September. Mr. Goodlette Indicated the Couittee discussed the allocation being reco~nded by staff, which is different then the one from the Committee. He said he feels what staff has recomnded ~ore clearly reflects the needs that were provided to the contttee. Co~lssioner Hesse asked Mr. Ooodlette how his coulttee looked et the recommendations,and Hr. Goodlette indicated that the coutttee considered the position of staff and the needs of the County as well as ho~ it will tsq~ct the schools. He indicated there was a great deal of discussion, but the Board of County Commissioners should determine the percentages based on need. Comlasloner Volpe questioned the basis of allocation for the city of Naples? Nr. NcLe~ore indicated the Coutttee used the prior administra- tion's sub~loelofl of projects ~hJch was unco--ltted and the fl~re ~tch was recom~ed was the ~rcentage of ~llars r~lred to ~r- fo~ t~se projects that met the criteria the coulttee let. He further stated that the committee cut $104 million In projects from tha Initial list, adding that the projects that were funded ~et the four service areas. He said the ?.75~ will fund the projects that relate to the four priority areas as outlined by the sales tax cosmlt- Co~tsstoner Volpe asked if the only f~mded projects will be drainage for 5 years for $4.5 allllon, a~d ~ach ren~rll~ for 812 million. Mr. NcLe~ore indicated that the Oordon River Bridge is included ~d tbelr project is es follo~s: $6.5 million for state roads 014 million for beach renourlsh~ent 84.5 million for water ~anage~ent or drainage (Page 13) Page 08 f~rch 13~ 1000 Col. John K. Beet)e, Jr. President of l~kewood CIvic Aeon., Executive Vice President of the Greater Naples Civic Assn., and aember and spokesman for the Presidents Council of the Naples Property 0wharfs Assn., currently representing 11,000 homeo~rners, indicated they regard the one cent sales tax as a key element in rupporttng the gTowth management ordinances and recomuexxds approval of these ordinan- ces without delay. He continued that the use of the sales tax to fund the Infrastructure is the fairest method of paying because It will relieve the property owners of the burden of paying the entire cost and visitor's and residents who do not pay property tax will also be contributing. Col. Beebe asked what the Board will do If the voters turn down the sales tax and the budget has already been approved, would the Board raima ad valores taxes, or, would they order moratorJua on new conmt~uctlon? Col. Beebe expressed other concerns regarding the funding of 867 million In state projects between 1990 and 1994. and 859 aillion bet- ~en 1995 &nd 1999. The question, he Indicated, is whether the miata will actually reimburse the county for this money or will the funds be Jeopardized? Commissioner Halle Indicated that the DOT ~lll not give the county any guarantees of reisbursement, but that negotiations are Possible. Nr. I~cl, emore and Co~liSSioner Yelps concurred by saying that the reimbursement My not come In money but as a trade-off, on a value for value contract. Col. Beebe indicated that this light be a suitable arrangement aa long as the Interest of the cltlzen*s of Collier County are protected. Re inquired, if the tax is proposed for 10 years, could Dr. Richey live with a 5 year tax If the second 5 years was turned down? The $choo! Board needs the funds to ~ove forward, he continued, and, questioned if the Board has considered the fact that if the tax referendu~ for 10 years ts turned down, it will cost $100,000 of tax- payers money to conduct another referendul in 5 years. 0(1(193 Fags 80 Nal'ch 13, 1990 Col, Keeb~ Indicated the Pres/dent's Council endorses the referen- dum only if the safe guards as lasted An the ad hoc couittee report are aade an Integral and irrevocable part of the sales tax referendma issue. Both the Greater Raples CIvic Assn. and the Lakewood ClvAc Assn. ~upport the ad hoc report aI~. ~fhen the issue is franed for the voters, it should be worded so that the voter knows he is chooalng to pay for infrastructure by the 1¢ sales tax if he votes in favor of the tax, and if he (the voter) votes agalnat It, he (the voter) wll! pay as much or ~ore In Increased ad valorun taxes, Col. Beebe saAd. He continued by sayAng that the sales tu, aa pre~ented t~ the ad-hoc connittee represents the beat way to fund the capital infrastructure needs for the next ten years. Col. Beebe encouraged the Board to educate the taxpayers An understanding water shortages, traffic congestion, beach erosAon and unacceptable degradation of the quality of life In the Naplea area which could occur if the tax la defeated. We aust, aa a cosmunity, he continued, co~e together and support the one-cent salsa tax, and the Board should lead the campaign for ~upport. Dr. Rlchey addressed the hoard and presented a prepared statement Nr. Nike Slayton, Administrator of the Big Cypress Basin Board, offered his support for the one-cent sa~es tax and also Bade a request that the CREW project be included, addlng that the CREW project be Investigated by the Coral Coulttee in July with reference to adding it to the Coral List. He said the CRE14 project's monetar~ need Is $10 Billion over the next 4-5 year period. Dr. Frae Stallings, representing the Conservancy, indicated he spanking An ~u~rt of the CR~ T~t ~nd Ac~l~ltlon on the of ecol~tcal value, ~ater contro~ and w~ter ~upp~y am~ctm. Dr. ~talllng~ l~lcated that the Conservancy ~ not taken a ~tand a~ yet on the one-cent sales tax and, ~hen Co~mlssloner ~~n asked if th~ Intended to take a stud, he Indicated he is not Nr. ~rold Hall of Everglades City s~ke on ~half of ~yor Butler 000'3-1 Page 60 Hatch 15, t990 to Indicate that the Everglades City Council supports the one-cent tax, and also indicated that the council will be happy with an equitable percentage. Hr. Frank Jones, City Nanager of the City of Naples, related the position of the City Council by ~a'~ that they recognize the sales tax option is available to the county to ~eet Growth Hanagement needs. The city has developed a plan and ~ust look at alternatives such as user fees, etc., he said. The City, in response to a request from the County developed a five year plan for capital costs, he con- tined, but not a 10 year plan; therefore, the plan before the Board represents five years and General needs. Hr. Jones pointed out the distribution will fall back to an lntsrlocal agree·ant and the city is prepared to negotiate such an agree~nt, reassuring the county that the cities projects will meet the criteria for sales tax usage. Co~nlmmioner Volpe lndlcsted that the voters need definitions for projects to be funded and the City of Naples will have to specifically define the ne·dm before the referendum. Co~missioner Shanahan added that the Board should ~aks the deci- sion and an lnterlocal agreement should be worked out with the city. Commissioner Volpe inquired whether the city has a fall back pro- vision in case ao~ of their projects do not get funded or the sales tax does not pass and Hr. Jones Indicated that the city has such a plan. Hr. 0eorge Keller Indicated that the figures change fro~ ~oment to ~o~ent, and according to fha State Department the county will collect 8521,657,742.00, but the countytm list totals to $541,902,000, which is · short fall of $20 aillion. He said the county's figures show $322,440,000 for the total list and $276.478,000 will be the countyts share wtlich ~eana shortfall of 845,962,000. Hr. Keller noted that the countytm list is bigger than the revenue that will be collected and indicated that the sales tax is not a reliable source of Hr. ~sller counted that he realm the sales tax had a 50/50 chance of passing, but people are disturbed about more taxes. He Page 61 N~rch 19, 1990 noted that t~o counties In Florida are reneging on bond Issues and he doee not want to see Collier County In the ease position. Commissioner ¥olpe requested that the public hearing on this ~tter be put off until after April 3. The Public Hearing on the AS! do~s not have a specific date, County Attorney Cuyler indicated, and Nr. NcLe~ors asked to have the public hearing on the Sales T~x prior to the A$I establlshsent. Co-missioner Hasse Inquired as to the date the Board wants to utablieh and C~lssloner Volpe indicated that he would like the hearing after the 3rd of April. Commissioner ihanahan suggested April 10, 1990, durlr~ the regular meeting. Nr. Keller added that he still supports a referendun aa long as the public Is advised and educated. Commlmmtoner ihanahan agreed with Nr. Keller. c~rried~n~m~ly, that a Public--lng on th~ Sales T~ le~u~ be held es ikprtl 10, 1990, ts~edlately follmelng tbe regul~ly scheduled 00096 Legal nottce having been publl~bod In the Naples Daily News on December 20, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, bids were received until 2:00 P.M. on January 19, 1990, to consider RFP-89-1503 - Hater Treatment Plan Design Services. Utilities Administrator Arnold stated that Items 901 and 9D2 are consultant selections for utility projects. He noted that six firms will ~ake presentations relative to RFP #89-1503. Hr. Ed Edwards of B~yle Engineering Introduced members of his teas, P~essrs. Vernon Lynch, lan Natson of Ross Technology, and Paul lk~dlon. Re advised that Boyle is a national firm, and has been serving i~ut~est Florida since 1981. He stated that the Ft. Myers office was opened in 1985, Is a full service office Including planning and pilot scale testing, design, and cad system construction manage- ~ent. ~e Indicated that all ~embrane technology capabilities are done at the Ft. Hyers office. Hr. Edwards Informed that his firm has completed projects in Ft. Nysre, Sarasota County, and Veto Beach. He advised that the team Staff will be dealing with has the expertise In membrane technology, and there will be no middle a~anage~ent. X~ Indicated that the sub consultants and the reviewing agencies are local, and everyone involved Is experienced In Implementing a project of success. He Indicated that Boyle will neet their commitments on time, within budget and to the satisfaction of Collier County. In answer to Coulasioner Rases, Hr. Lynch advised that the Veto Beach plant Is a reverse osmosis system with membrane softening. He lnfor~ed that the membranes that ars used In softening are not suitable for ~esoftening. Page 63 OOJ. O0 March 13, 2990 Zn response to Coniasioner Shanahan, Mr. Watson stated that ~embrane softening units do soften the water, and blending the water wll! result in acceptable potable water directly to the user. Conissioner Goodntght questioned what the team would reco~end for the excess wastewater? Hr. Edw-.rf~ replied that in Ft. Myers, the reject Nater Is being softened and used for the irrigation of golf courses, and recomaended that the eau thing be done in Collier County. Cmisstoner Goodnight stated that if one of the alternatives will ultimately be to go to a R.O. system, she would hope that the Commission and Staff will have enough foresight so that the plant that will be built no~ will hold that capacity. She questioned whether there will be sufficient tl~e to give Boyle enough notice to add that facility to the building7 Hr. Arnold advised that NlsaJJer & Associates have been previously retained to do the three dimensional ~odeling on the Lo, er Tamiami Aquifer in Golden Gate Estates, and that has been Identified, thus far, as Collier County's source of water to the year 2000. He Indicated that the concurrent teat drilling to look at deeper zones will sho~ whether there ts the capability to pu~p reject water in that area. He stated that the County needs to get water on line before the and of another season, or there mmy be a serious deficit situation. Ha noted that when the consultants co~ aboard there will be the professional expertise to discuss these things during the design process. Mr. Edwards stated that t~m County has ~ade the right decision with regard to ~e~branes, and noted that the flexibility goes from ttmre. Commissioner Hesse asked If the pumping will be equipped to bring up higher pressures for E.G. systems? Nr. Watson replied afftr- ~tivsly, noting that the Itt, es ~lll Im the ~a~ ~nd th~ volumes going in will be nearly the sm. 00101 Page 84 March 13, 1990 ~ro Richard ~4oore of Cup, Dresser and McKee (CD~), Introduced the team of John Callse and Bill Suratt. He stated that he and Mr. Suratt ers currently working on the completion of an R.O. Plant and wellfteld Jn Venice, Florida. Hr. ~oore informed that his ft~ vtll produce a ~lllty product t~t ~ets the needs of the County, and ~111 ~et the tl~ and ~dget c~mtraints of the project. He stated that he understands the project to ~ve ~ 18 ~nth schedule so that the treatment plant ca~c~ty will ~ on line prior to the ~ak de.nd ~riod tn 1992. Nr. Suratt stated that his fl~ ~s a lot of recent ex. fiance with ~brane pl~tm, and ~ted that the technolo~ Is ch~glng con- tin~sly a~ ve~ rapidly. He re~rted that the n~ Venice plant demised for 4 ~D and there will ~ 2 ~D Initially, and 2 NGD to folly. He stated t~t this lm blended with their existing line eof- tenl~ plant~ ~Jch is ~lmllar to the ~ltuatlon In Collier Count~. In mr to Coulssloner Hasse, Hr. ~ore re,fred that the plant c~ ~ ~sJ~d to convert to a R.O. syste~ at a later date'. Cmlssioner O~dnight ~eztloned what Is recomnded for the wast~ter fros the ~brane softening plant? Hr. Noore repl~ed t~t M feels t~t the deep Injection ~11 Is pro~bly the ~*t conser- vative ~lutlon. Co~llsloner S~nah~n questioned ~hether the walt~ater c~ld used for irrigation7 Hr. ~re stated that he does not ~lleve t~t this s~ld ~ considered, since he doubts whether the ~cles ~ld all~ this ~lt~.out a ~ckup well. Co~lssloner S~han questioned whether there Is ~ch odor clat~ ~1th the ~br~e plants? Hr. Hoots advised ~f there 1e hydro- g~ ~lflte In the ground ~ater, It ~11 co~ out at the p~ant, and ~t~ t~t the plant In Venice ~s a hydrogen sc~b~r to t~ ~. ~re concluded that the key advantages t~t C~ will bring to ~lller C~ty ~s its local presence, full se~lces within the fur track e~rlence, immediate availability, and they are the only M~rch 13, 1990 firu that has been fortunate enough to have been short-listed on both the Treatment Plant and the WellflSldo He stated that tf his firm is selected for both projects, the County will realize a cost savings of be~een 5H and 2OH. Commissioner Goodnight questioned the length of tiaa Involved tn designing the plant? Hr. Hoers replied that the actual design of a aJallar project on a fast-track effort took approxtsmtely 4 months. He reported that the 4 MGD module system Is currently on CDM~s con- p~lter 8fld he believes that the design could be cospleted within a 3-4 month time frame. Nr. Wllllas Town,end of Coflaoer Townsend & Associates (CT&A) stated t~t this is one of the most iaportant utility decisions that the Commission will ~uke. He informed that the teas of CT&A and Stone & #sharer Includes 13 key professionals with IZ5 years of cosblned experience. He noted that hie firs has worked on the County's water plant exparmton, a nusber of waatewater plant expansions, and a nusber of pipe line projects which have been performed on an extremely tight time schedule due to the rapid growth of Collier County, and all the projects have been coapleted within the construction budget set forth. He explained that CT&A understands what Staff expects of an engineer, the quality and timeliness of the work, and how they like things done. Nr. Bill Conlon of Stone & Webster, advised that his firs celebrated their lOOth year in business this past year, and was recently cited b~ Business Weuk as one of the fires in the United 8tares with the most assets. He informed that his firs has been involved with project studies ranging free 400,000 OD to 92 HOD, and rioted that Pale Beach County has recently requested that Stone & #abater review the design of another engineering firs of what will goon be the world's largest sesbrane softening plant consisting of 28 J~3D. He stated that he was the first person to design a low pressure reverse osmosis brackish water plant which resulted tn a 40~ savings to the industry energy wise. He indicated that the brackish water 00~03 Page 66 March ~3, IggO :plant takes the waste free the concentrate under pressure and reco- vers the energ~ that ts sill! there by turning a turbine backwards In generating po~er. He explained that he was the first person involved in using deep well Injection on two different projects for reverie oseo~le. Mr. Conlon related that he was Involved with the design of the mbrane ~oftening plant tn Pelican Bay, and he also worked for the senbrane smnufacturer that produced the first softening senbrane. He advised that he is currently designing the Marco Island R.O. Plant which ia a very difficult project since the water la degradattng et ?0~ In a 10 year period. Mr. Con]on reported that the proposed plant hen been laid out with 8 M~D initially, and ultimately an additional 4 MGD. He stated that tbs plant will be constructed In e ~odular fashion noting that the lelbrane building will consist of tNo stories and will contain the R.O. equipment. He Indicated that a scrubber and concentrated dllpo- I~l ~11 will be used to provide for irrigation or whatever lathed Is approved for disposal. In an~eer to Comilaelonar ihanahan, Mr. Conlon advised that he believes that the concentrate disposal should be nixed with the waatewater effluent and supplemented with other well water for golf course Irrigation. He reported that he would recownd deep well Injection aa a last resort since It la the ~oat expensive way to go. ~r. Charles Gear, Project Director, Klale¥-Horn and Associates, Itu:. explained that It la very llport~nt for the Couleilon to look at the firm th4t has the beet recent experience, the people associated with that fire who have the experience, and who has th~ beet technical approach. Nr. Deer advised that [Inlay-Horn has had operating senbr~ne plante In Florida for 20 years, and these plants are producing good ~ater today. ~e noted that there ts a 12 NOD plant under construction 0010.1 Page 67 Narch 13, 1990 in Jupiter and will be on line within a fe~ months, and a 4,5 NOD plant tn 14~rtln County is currently In the design phase. He Informed that u rapidly as menbrane technology ts changing, If a firm does not have m plant that is currently goin9 on, they are falling behind. He mdvlsed that a water shortage wam fast approaching in the Jupiter area, and without Innovative solutions, they were facing a moratorium. He reported that as of today, the plant will start up In a fe~ ~onths. Nr. Oeer stated that he believes that the same approaches that ~re used In Jupiter can be used In Collier County, and will save 11 month~ and 1.5 million dollars. He advlmed that his flr~ does the process design, ~hereas, ~any fir~s simply write a perfor~mnce spec and then turn It over to a vendor systems house who does the design conmtruct process. He Informed that ell the details of the design are done tn Klmley-Horn~s shop, and they are able to choose nation-wide the best equipment to put in the plant. He noted that uny of the system houses are equlp~nt reps for various ~anufacturerm and they only design in the equipment they represent. Hr. Geer called attention to the issue of concentrate disposal. He related that Staff has talked about recycling this through the existing plant, and noted that this could work, but offered another Idea ~hlch he believes will save e lot ~ore money: using the con- centrate es an irrigation resource. He Informed that the last thing hm ~ould reco~nd, is deep well injection mince It takes perfectly good water and flushes It do~n a hole, and It Is lost forever. He stated that In Florida, water cannot be wasted In that ~anner, and added that deep well injection Is very expensive, and could add millions of dollars to this pro~ect. Nrc Geer explained that the range of operation of the ~e~brane · ymte~ is determined by the number of contamlnentm that need to be removed from th~ water. H~ affirmed that th~ groundwater quality in South Florlde la getting worse, and noted that salt water lntrumlon tm · threat to ~ells all around the coast. He stated that provisions be ~ada In the design to add ptmps for the future and the piping Is 00105 Page 68 Hatch 13, 1990 sized for the higher concentrate. Ne indicated that if 8-10 yeare down the road there are water prob]en, with salt water intrusion, modifications would be made, the ~embranes would be changed to the ]~ pr~re R.O. ~abr~es and the available fresh water will ~ used to ~ the softening plant t~t already exists. Hr. Gear Jnfor~d that in addition to himself, other team memberm, ~smrm. Pltchford, PeAts, and Rlminger are ~er9 of K~mley-Horn ~Jch ~m stability to the County. He advlmed that ham farm Am a top 100 firm In the nation, and there are over 400 empl~eem wlth off~ce~ fr~ Florida to California. In mr to Cmieeloner Hames, Hr. Gear replied t~t de--dAng ~ ~ available the wast~ater lm, him firm has ~en ~ccemsful in ble~ing the bracklmh water with wamt~ater effluent to the ~tnt ~ere It wee fremh en~gh to ume for ArrJgatJon. He noted that the ~co~ option ~ld ~ to ~k mt the dAmtance for m ~rface dlsc~rge, a~ ~d that, the ~et costly option w~ld ~ deep ~]~. He mtmted t~t If a good ~urce of grey water can ~ f~nd, the ~mt m~roach ~]d ~ to blend d~ mo that the golf courmm grammem could ha~le the malJnity. Hr. Gear adv~med tht other ~m~rm of the team are: John Lee~n, Glen Hiller, Julia O'Meml, and lan Marmon, who Am a full tJ~ ~mbrane e~rt. Hr. ~er orated that the Jupiter plant la the model for Collier C~ty*e plant, and the ex~rAence Am dArectly tranm~rtable to this project. He re~rked that a]J tl,e drawlngm are on h~m fArm*m CADD ~mt~, ~ the~ are readAly a~ptable which Am another way to marx Hr. Dill Durkln, Vice President of Halcolm Plrnie, stated that his firn wll! handle the project management and the waatewater plant design, and they are Joined by Hileon, Hiller, Barton, Boi3 & Peek, Inc., who will handle the local Issues: rezonlng, P~r~ltm, and pipelines. He Indicated that him team is alas Jo/ned by Rostek 00106 Page 69 Hatch 13, I990 · ervices, Inc., who will be the process consultant. Hr. Durktn Informed that his firm presently has under construction a 12 N~tD plant, slsllar to Collier County's, and a 2 NGD water treat- stent plant for ~ltona Utilities under desto. Hr. ~rkln re.fred that 'revers~ os~sls' is a te~ t~t ts used ve~ l~sely, and the process Is one that de~nds a ~ch higher ener~ t~ ~r~e softening and it d~s not have the reJectl~ or ~re ~ter cs~biltty of a ~sbrane ~ftenlng plant. i-~rt~nt that the water Is ~tched ~lth the process. He advised that a sable of the r~ water ~pply has ~en analyzed, and he con.rs t~t the process for Collier C~nty Is a ~e~brane softening process. Hr. ~rkln indicated that he understands that a co~letton date of ~ua~, 1992 Is of ut~st ls~rtance. He noted t~t based on ~rlence. of two other S~th Florida plants, a .yste. has be~n laid ~t ~Ich will ~et that goal. He related that the design of the ~br~ne packag~ ~Jll lnw~lve the pilot plant testing, bid package for the ~sbr~, the ~ard, the ~nufacture of those ~sbr~nes, ~d con-. ~rrent with that, the desl~ of the ~lldlng ~tll co~nce. ststed tM~ there ~111 ~ approxl~tely 8 ~nths of the const~ctlon p~se, 3 ~nths for the Installation of the ~.brane., I ~nth start up, ~d I ~nth of shake d~. In mr to Cos. lssloner 5hanahan, Nr. ~rkln replied that the antlclp~te~ co~ettt;ct:o~ ~.,~-tlon date t~ Janunry, 1992. Mr. Bill ~rton, of Hllso,~, ~iller, Barton, Soil & Peek, Inc., ~vl.d tMt he wtll ~ ~rso~lly res~nslble to see that this pro- Ject continues to ~ on tlse and ~lthtn budget tMt ts develo~d. He tndic~ted that if at any tl~ the Co~lssloa dsslres to h~ve an lnterts u~te, or has questions, etc., he ~111 res~nd tuedlately. Co~tssioner ~sse questioned where the discharge of westerner b~ ~en directed? Nr. ~rkln Informed that thr~e ~sslbllttles ~tll ~ st~led ~rlng the design: Irrigation, deep well ln~ectton, ~nd ble~t~ with the existing water supply. He advised that deep well Page 70 00107 Narch 13, 1990 injection is the ~ost co~only used. Mr. Durktn explained that hie fir~'e relevant experience Includes: two ~embrane softening plants either under construction or desi~ in S~th Florida; local kn~ledge, represented by Bill ~rton and his co~y~ re~la~o~ Issues are ~deratood; technical ~r~lse~ a pro- Ject ~ger who ~s been lnvolved with the two ~embrane moftenlng pl~m~ ~d a preen track record of ~lng able ~o desA~ theme . Of plants. staff; R~tek S~rvJcel; and Nll~on, Hiller, Barton, Soll& Peek, Inc. as a unite teas, ~ich ~J]l result Jn dollar savings to Colller ~ty ~ a ~tJsfled In a~r to Co~tssloner Hesse, Hr. ~rkJn lnfor.ed that a ~odu- ~ar desl~ ~ld all~ for future expanslon, If needed. CmJssJo~r S~n~n ~est~oned whether considerations should be given to an upfront design of t~ faclllty that can ~ c~verted to R.0. ~ pressure/R.O, high presets? Nr. lan ~atson, of Rostek Se~lces, Inc., replied that the life of one of these plants Is generally m~t 20 years, and if within that 20 year period Staff and t~ desi~ engineer feel that there ~ay ~ a ~sslbllity to go to hight pressure o~ratlon, the dest~ should definitely ~ Included. Nr. ~rton lntr~uced Mike Kennedy who will ~ Ntlson, Miller.s Project ~ger for the local Issues. Nr. Jon ~er, of Post, BuCkl.~y, Schuh & Je~tgan, Inc. {PBS&J) stat~ t~t his fire ~s the sincere Interest and desire In ~rking with Staff to give the Co~ty a plant which will sect Its needs ~d be ~ c~t effective as ~sslble. Hr. ~er lntr~uc~ Fr~ Bte~, Senior Vice President of 0.J. ~rta, Project ~ger and ~eebr~e s~clallst, and ~b Vice Presl~nt, PBS/J, who ~111 ~ coordinating the as~cts of the pl~t facility. Hr. ~er lnfor~d that the first membrane techno~o~ pl~t In the OO1O8 Pag~ 71 Stite of Florida wag PBS&3*o Ocean Reef Club I M(3D, Re reported that the first lo~ pressure ~embrane system was a PBS&J plant in Pelican Bay In 1978, and in 1979 a 2 NGD plant follo~ed In Venice. He noted that In 1986 his firm did the first full scale conceptual design of a 16 NGD le~brane softening plant in Boynton Beach, and as of last loath, the conceptual design was colpleted for a 30 NOD ~eibrane sof- tening plant in Brevard County. Nr. O.J. Herin called attention to displayed exhibits of two wbrane softening designs: conventional/standard design, and a ~odlfled design, that his fire, if selected, w111 propose to discuss with County Staff. He noted that the conventional design incorporates three stages, and the sodlfled design incorporates four stages. He lnforled that the advantage of the Iodlfled design ts a 95~ recovery, ·nd the concentrate is approximately 1/3 of the conventional design. Commissioner Shanahan questioned what PBS&.I recosm~nde for dispo- sal of the brine? Nr. Herin replied that his first choice would be to go beck to the line softening plant. Mr. Norln related that sase of the options offered by the proposed design is a higher recovery, and the slaller treatment plant sits w111 result in i higher drinking water quality and ~ore raw water can be blended with the product water. He stated that the ~odlfled design is about 1§~ lo.er tn capital costs than the conventional design. noted that ha understands that Staff prefers a two-story arrangesent with the sesbrane plant being on the first floor. He noted that the second floor w111 contain the control room, laboratory and offices. Comaissloner Shanahan questioned whether the plant will be designed to step up from membrane sc~tenlng to R.O. low pressure to high pressure, If the need arises? Mr. Herin responded that this option will be discussed with Staff, but it la not being recommended at this tiM. it thtm tiaa, the Co~l~lon co.plated the Consultant kle~cion ~- ~t~e~l. ~lomer Yelps lift the sting prior to the 00109 Itt. al~nold ~mounc~d that ~ completion o£ the tsb~latlon~, the Colaisiloa has selected Boyle [~gtneiring ~i the #1 r~aked fizl; the ~2 flrl is Ltlley-~orn; I~d the #3 firl resulted in a tie between l~egal notice having been published In the Naples Dally News on December I?, 1989, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication flied with the Clerk, bids were received until 2:00 P.N. on January 12, 1990, to consider RFP 89-1505, #ellfleld Design. ~--o ~, ~q.~.~c~, Inc. Hr. John Callse, of Cs=p, Dresser, and NcKee, Inc. (Cl~}, Intro- duced Presets. Richard ~re ~nd Fred ~eir. He advised t~t am project ~ger, he is co~$tting to ~]ntaln the County's schedule and pro- Ject as advertised, and noted that he understands that this project to be compatible with the Treatment Plant design. Re indicated that his tau has sire·dy reviewed the plans and data for the existing ~ellftsld and they ·rs up to speed and are ready to couence the tnt- tl·l design within · 90 day period In · fast track effort. Hr, Csliee lnforud that one itel of Interest la the telsletry which is s very significant aspect of the operational needs of the facility to interface with the raw water supply and the treatment facility. Nr. Callse st·ted that If selected, his firm's mission will be the design and construction of the welld and the transmission piping that ts needed to get to the booster pulp station. Nr. Fred Nelr Informed that the expansion of the existing wellfield will increase the capacity by approximately 6 NOD. Ne noted that there are presently 16 supply wells and another 5-8 dt I ~IGD are r~eeded. Ne stated that since this will be a supply well for the Page 73 00.I 10 l~ch 13, 1990 mbrane filter treatment procees, attempts will be made to reduce the proble-- with steel casings and corrosion and the formation of scale. He indicated that another thing that will be looked at Is minimizing air getting into the system which promotes growth of bacteria and pre- cipitation of Iron and other solld~. He informed that non-ferrous types of Mterlal ~111 be considered for the ~ell casings. ~r. ~lr advised t~t ~hen the ~11s are drilled, casings ~111 ~ s~t d~ to a~t 50 feet, and ce~nted at the land ~rface to provide an ade~te seal. He noted that an o~n hol~ ~lll then ~ drilled In the ll~stone ~ith a cir~latlon system ~lthout any drilling fluids. He e~lalned that pu~plng tests In the ~ells w111 ~ conducted to dete~tne the depth that the ~sps should ~ set. Nr. Calise stated that he ~lleves t~t C~ sh~ld ~ selected for this pro~ect since they ~re a full se~tce fl~ ~lth tn-h~se ca~bllltles la facilities engineering and hydr~eolo~, ex~rlence with water supply ~ells, kn~ledge of Southwest Florida hydrogeolo~, ~ledge In working ~lth Staff, ex~rlence with the co~nlty ~p- ~rt, and they are available and can l~edlat~ly co~nc~ the work. He ~ted t~t they ~111 provide tbs ~st res~nslbl~ se~lc~ on th~ project and ~111 ~t th~ County*s goals. Hr. B~ce ~frenz stated t~t his Ilr~ started In 19Y~ with 13 ~ople ~ served land develop~nt interests and civil engineering le~ice8 In Central Florida. He noted that Presently, the company empl~s 260 ~ople, ~s four offices, and serves the Northeast, Central, and South~es~ Florida In a wide range of environmental hydro- geol~lc civil engineering ~d surveying services. Hr. ~frenz lnfor~d tht ~llklson Engineering ~ill ~ a partner ~ this pro~ect. ~ ~ldentified s~aker from ~llkJson ~ngln~ering stlted thlt his firs ~111 ~ the local sub-consultant, and ~ill ~ involve6 in ~ virlety of tasks as the day-to-day couunlcator ~lth the Otilltlcs Division, ~d ~y tasks relating to the wellfleld dest~ that re, ire 00.! 11 Page 74 14arch 13, 1990 m~m~ne to go out to the site, Nr. Imfrenz that his firs Is currently participating as lead engineer in ~ellfleld design for a Port St. Lucia project, an Edgewater ~ellfteld expansion which ts a 4°5 HGD, and a Lakeland 16 HOD deep ~ell construction. He noted that the approach In general la to do specific testing of wellfleld sites for hydraulic parameters, look at the existing wells and problesm that ~ay be encountered, and then design the wellflelds to prevent those problems. Comlssloner Haase noted that there Is an existing 30~ main that runs ali the way down Golden Gate BlVdo, and questioned whether this Is mafflcient to handle the additional pu~pa? Hr. Arnold advised that the husker of wells Is still to be determined. I~leo I~mt~ ~mdA~s<~$~te~o Inc. Nr. Tom Taylor of Role, Hontes & Associates (HHA}, stated that his firm has been Involved with the County's watur supply efforts for several years, and noted that the sase team that has been working on these Issues for the past 6 years will participate in this project, If selected. Hr. Taylor Introduced HesSrao atanle~ Hole, Lloyd Horvath of Hleslmar & Associates, who will be in charge of hydrology, And Hr. [Irk Hartin of Htssimar & Associates who will be in charge of design of the actual well drilling and casing efforts. Hr. Taylor advised that HHA will be the prime conmaltant for the project, but it was felt that it was lsportant to Involve Hlsstmar & Associates in order to contiaue the eama team that has been utilized for pa~t projects in Collier County. Hr. Taylor outlined so~e of the unique qualifications of HNA, and the key tasks and issues for cospletlon of the project. He Indicated that I~A has been Involved wlth the wellfteld expansion effort since 1984. He called attention to the plant on C.R. 951 and the major transstssion facilities running up C.R. 951 and out to tim wsllfteld In the area of ~llson Boulevard. Page 75 00.I la Ha=ch 13, 1990 #lth regard to converting at a later date to an R.O. process, Hr. Taylor co.~ented that this could be done by keeping part of the NIbrane softening process and then doing a blend. He indicated that he belles, es that the lllits that will be ~stabltshed relative to the addttlor~al contaminant levels will be able to be net. In an~er to Co~sstoner Hasse, Hr. Tay~o~ re.fred that ~lll ~lect the ~st location for the additional we~ls, and th~ advise ~ether the expansion sh~]d go to the east, north, ov south. He related t~t there Is a ~tantial ~t of water available that will not effect the I~l]~ ~ells, ~t there Is the ~ssibiltty of effectl~ ~ of the Individual dee~r ~lls going into the ~r T~t~t ~lfer. He comnted that the ~dellng effort wll~ dateline h~ ~y ~lls ~y ~ effected and If the existing ~s need to ~c~nged for larger capacity In mr to Co~lszioner Shmn, ~r. Taylor stated that ~tenttal proble~ with effects on the ~branes are scaling, iron, ~d hydr~en sulfite, but these can ~ addressed prior to ent~ to the pl~t. Hr. Taylor re~rked that no one kn~s the Collier C~nty ~ste= ~tter t~ ~, and no one ~s the hydr~olo~ ~tter t~n Nlssl~r and Associates. He noted that his ftr~ has demonstrated the ability to ~et project mchedules and ~dgets, and they keep t~ir c~nge orders to the very ~lntsu~. He tnfor=ed that he the Coulsslon will entrust th~tr confidence In ~A to parlors a solid project that ~111 ~ successfully Cmlssloner Shanahan asked Hr. Taylor what he ~lleves is the ~zt s~iflc~t reason that ~ should be selected for this ~rt~t project? Nr. Taylor replied that he feels that ~ should ~ selected based on the t~st and confidence that they have ea~ed fr~ t~ Co~ission and County Staff, and tn the succ~s they have de. narrated on p~t projects during the past 6 yearm. 00113 March ~ ,~ Bt'. M'nold ~ tim rem~lte of the tatmlatioa~ a~ follM~ ~ ~ ~, I~. ~ ~r, Rl~ile, Mills ~ P~t, lng. There being no further buslneee for the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 8:30 BOARD OF COUNTY COI~IISSIO~S BOARD OF ZOIIIIIG APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVEIU(IIIG BOARD(S) OP SPKC~AI, DTSTR~ICTS URDKR CONTROF. me preoented approved by the Board on / or as corrected 001 J .1 Page 77