Loading...
Backup Documents 02/11/2014 Item #10B 10 Patricia L. Morgan From: Durham, Tim Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2014 8:02 AM To: Patricia L. Morgan Subject: BCC 02.11.2014 -Item 10 B Attachments: La Peninsula Exhibits.pdf Trish, Attached are my slides from yesterday. CT/4/2014 e Executive Manager of Corporate Business Operations for Collier County, Florida Website: www.colliergov.net E-mail: timdurham @colliergov.net Phone: (239)252-8383 lotto r,Al.adaiesees ere uL,b e;i ,orris if you do not your e-ma E eadress r.eased respons.e to a pubic record.request nor send e. t n row ro t E ;c=airy L S 1000.C.once:this office k°y telephone or rn vrtithrg. 1 0B _ . V N D m . r x eg 0 Q 0 t s t ‘ ... . '14::, ...I I 'N1104,44_ .4„...,..,,::.,...::.,„ T. 4r ; .. s' .+w s t} S t� -a G ' /am W �>% Z b"1-1 %dd '':::;:1,1.,".. J ,A m ,'s Sri ' '; __., -::'..74: 't 1 �' P , °*am- " ! ri''' ?'o _l; l ".to r�is � .A ;' R�" • rie 3s^ ' l'.:..,. „, . :....:::„......2,. .,,,,.. .„.........,......,...,,,...,.r. .,,.: ,.,..,.:0..,. r . . ,...„. semi ,, . rilis .,.. ..,,, .:. „ , ....,. . . :„..... . ,....,44 .„„ „.. . .,...„ . ,, .. .. ,. . .. . , ... .. .......,... ......,,,,:„.,..-. ZtFryfk Ili ♦. a"r of v„ . v'�/r -- fh` ��`' yr Nv! 9 ;/• d:•I. :,. 06 N a a O W 111111 m x s r- v x O O f \4040144041/4., t ' if C S:t,...":':4'. II i:k),,,,,,11111111111H1 611°11°:III..- ' e a A a @ ON , VSt ,,,, ,,, * �1 ) ,40 - ,' - - '4:‘-:,ar _ t -:".;'*:,g' yf ~ ' t y,I".* ' r e. ♦ a i 41.14:---.4 $ a ,r-0° ri ,„ a = X .1--- i '' ; P1 : � . . _ f ., � o b iii . a / sy..t^�, 4,,wh 1e .0,,, ... .Fti a , 0.114...�:.• 0B 17-1 N O N m 5 r X O 1 O t, a .. • r .' i T :20411\1 tr 1 .4„ ,r.,..,,ii,, ik....„ 4 „,,,.... c..i„....\ 1 It , ? �a l' b ..", ?.a� °,� ° ik \ rill r art. Y r ..v X�jil 4 ),t + _ Y �. •,,-,� _- cG = k. l Mel X . , j r cif " s AIJI ;y : u t �� y aw t� r!r ♦ yxrfir w r 1,a „4 , � e 1� , { � � r y;.[ :: } .ti. ' S►, , � `III ' [tu ( . _: a .. ' �'a t r a st y a rA . {F ,/,.-r r V. �., k d' i r, o VI 4y4 4 j Itti° . : w. 1 p A. ti w / f t ,:e y ` ' �i*` �*ar 4 fir; :.■ "Atelt, or ,14 /� ! • 1. ■+fi a tj +"r ,. A -kikr'i..aka" a ' so 10B i itiel, ," l' ...... , a ■ I, „„Itor',.,,--.41. ... , .,' ii It...tii; fff�aa ^, a ,a 1.., Sx ) .1. y ; * "�� A 4�' �t it ,., ,, • k f' k ' o i# . 4 wtr �• it 1' c.. ! 0 � *Y .fi - r , r. . � • 'Ilk.t = V , .,., f- 0•4•7: -,'a , lc .:�} ,,,.... • , --0 01,, ...-.1 di ".. . It- '''' i i , • .„I',4 ,1. ,111: S. , 1 0 B . 1 ,, . -7 , 2 „ . .. = cD s',..-4';'-'; 'rs..-.:::.---' . ",' V '4'4 .,”a• (-, o , ' ' 4 , . . j I ..,4' ci ;.. tf i 41" " 1 * - ` 4 4... ..,"; °.t.'..,-.:-. . fi.- ' at _ . - - ) . -4.i4' .• II* ''' ' '. . -.... . .• • .. , )1. •S 41., . .,, .. ,,.. • lit ,. ),iij i: ipt, ' ;•,, tit .• zit, ti • 0 0. AI i, _. 0- I - ' 4:4 /1 - . k , ,... euti,t • CI 4::. I',, :iiiiii° I liTifl' (2:. F-8 .' • ;t) : . 5 )ti, ' „ 1 a-. 0 1 0) .,it- -3 CU n • 4 • Hitt ..!. i , u.,. CD 1 . . ...., 51.\:t CD = 1 N 1 c?)., ii • 14, • :i )..,.. .• co to. 1 , , < N.... ch c, Fi tit * , , lg... I g .., =. . i4 ---„,i.,., i; ' ,_ ... ,_, s, if .-. r- , ;4.. , • . 10'4.:'.• : __ a . . t- tot '' --.474 -t• 4., -24 ._. Jr , ll -. .....,t , . ,, , ..1'' 4,, . ., . . • . . . - ..,. I. . --. 10 B .\,,v 1 )1 WOODWARD, PIRES & LOMBARDO, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CRAIG R.WOODWARD February 10, 2014 Bond CacEet Real Ease MARX J.WOODWARD Board CatifiodRalEt t ANTHONY P.PIRES,JR bawl Caofioa:CANCamtx Board of County Commissioners Via Hand Delivery&Email and LacliG°"mnicnt Collier County, Florida J,CHRISTOPHERLOMBARDO 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 202 Bond FIL Naples, Florida 34112 Re: Agenda Item 10.B, February 11, 2014 Agenda; La Peninsula Adni Seawall Municipal Services Benefit District (MSBU)to Of Cawrel ROBERT E.MURRELL Dear Commissioners: Of Caard As you are aware from my presentation at your meetings of October JENNIFERL()EYRIES 8, 2013 and December 10, 2013 concerning the above referenced MSBU, I JENNIFER M. TENNEY have been retained by the La Peninsula Condominium Association Inc., to EW P FLORES represent it and provide assistance requesting that the Board of County I.TODD MURRELL Commissioners of Collier County adopt an ordinance establishing the MSBU to fund La Peninsula seawall repairs and/or replacement. Since the date of the establishment of the MSBU by Ordinance No. 2013-70 (the "MSBU Ordinance"), a public petition was filed by a non- resident of La Peninsula requesting that the County Commission reconsider and repeal the MSBU Ordinance and the initial assessment resolution, Resolution No. 2013-292, that were adopted on December 10, 2013. The reconsideration is scheduled to be heard as Agenda Item 10.B on February 11, 2014. I have been authorized by my client to request that the Board of REPLY TO: County Commissioners not repeal or rescind either Ordinance No. 2013-70 or Resolution No. 2013-292 and the following are some of the matters that I XD 37AOTAMIAMISUITE will address on my client's behalf at the upcoming County Commission NAPLES,FL 34103 meeting, with the recognition that additional matters and materials may be 239-649-6555 239-649-7342 FAX presented at the meeting. 606 BALD EAGLE DRIVE SUITE 500 We County of th t th respect recommendation oe Coun Attorney that a P.O.BOX ONE p `7 Y MARCO ISLAND,FL 34146 validation proceeding should be filed, later on in the process, as to the 239-642-6402 FAX MSBU purpose and financing. Nonetheless, in order to avoid waiting until a later date to initiate and pursue a validation proceeding, my client has WWWWPL-LEGALCOM authorized me to propose an alternative method for obtaining a "third party " review of the issue that has been raised and asserted. 10 8 The alternative, less expensive and shorter process or mechanism for having a review of the "public purpose issue" would be for the County Commission to direct the County Attorney to request a formal Attorney General's Opinion. On behalf of my client it is hereby requested that the County Commission direct the County Attorney to request a formal Attorney General's Opinion on the question as to whether the scope of the proposed project, i.e. the repair and or replacement of the seawall at La Peninsula within the boundaries of the MSBU, serves a valid public purpose under Florida law. Further, I have had an opportunity to review the on-line materials associated with this agenda item and concur with the opinions of both the County Attorney and Nabors Giblin & Nickerson that the creation of the MSBU and its purposes are legally supportable and defensible. In addition to the "public purpose" analysis contained in the agenda materials, I would suggest that any analysis relating to the public purpose should also recognize prior action(s)/program(s) of the County Commission authorizing or using tax increment financing (TIF) funds, which are County funds, public funds, to fund a portion of private seawall repairs in the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA (see attached "A", excerpts of materials, Shoreline Stabilization Grant Program) as well as the well stated public purpose rationale articulated by the City of Punta Gorda (see attached "B"). Thus it is requested that the Board of County Commissioners not repeal or rescind either Ordinance No. 2013-70 or Resolution No. 2013- 292, to allow the continued existence of the MSBU and your MSBU Advisory Committee to address this public safety issue. Sincerely, / A t " -s, Jr., Esq. APP/Ig Enclosure(s) cc w/encl: Jeff Klatzkow 106 ATTACHMENT “A” Monday, February 10, 2110 8 . .„. ,,,. . , „ .., , , . ,.. , ...„,, ., „,....„ ... it: ,,l,„. 4 „. ..„, ,„ __ „n, a h 4 ANI 111114:k i K G' I -{c ii ''W ,`may ``. `� `�``` ^ - ate r ..,^ ik......Lz..t,__ �a Before After http://bgtcra.com/wp-conte... Page 1 of 1 7:13:47 AM 10 B BAYSHORE GATEWAY 'n AIL TRIANGLE COMMUNITY Fdf UCVF FOPMCNT AC,F:NCY 4",+4`do• Memorandum To: Finance From: Sue Trone (suetrone©colliergov.net/643-1115) Date: Re: Payment of Shoreline Stabilization Grant The Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Board approved Shoreline Stabilization Grant 01/2008 for Mrs.Mary A.Luedtke for her property located at 2854 Becca Avenue,Naples,FL 34112.The local contact for Mrs.Luedtke is her husband,Mr.Randall Luedtke,who has her power of attorney(attached).The grant was approved on May 27,2008,item 16G1.The total grant amount to be paid is$5,000. Please find the following documents attached for your review: 1. The executed CRA Agreement; 2. Signed and notarized Payment Request Form; 3. Cancelled checks for all payments to contractors for CRA-approved work;and 4. After photos as verification of work completed. Please send Mrs.Luedtke a check for$5,000 to the following address: 2180 Snook Drive Naples. FL 34112 Please deduct the reimbursement funds from Fund 187/138325/884200.Thank you. 1 BAYSHpRE lOB ;' GATEWAY ,' ` TRIANGLE 4M, cM As.g Mrs.Mary A.Luedtke Mr.Randy Luedtke Commissioner 6947 Madrid Drive James N.Colette Demotte,Indiana 46310 Commissioner Fred W.Coyle May 30,2008 Cornmissioner Donna Fiala Chairman Dear Mrs.and Mr.Luedtke: Commissioner Frank Hales This letter is being sent to you to notify you that your application for a Shoreline Commissioner Stabilization Grant was approved by the CRA on May 27th,2008.I am enclosing a Tom Henning copy of the Agreement which specifies the terms of the grant You may now agylasnt commence work. awl Chairman Please note that you have been awarded$5,000 based on an estimated cost of Lindsey Thomas $65,000 to repair your seawall at 2854 Becca Avenue,Naples,Florida 34112.You vice-Chair have one year to complete the work(May 27,2009)and submit your Project Jill Bwy Summary Report Form and Payment Request Form(this requires of all receipts, Karen Beatty cancelled checks,credit card validations to be attached). Ron Fovde cx,uac our Please call me with any questions. Maurice Gr Regards, Steve Main VNliam Mears Bruce Prattle Sue Trone Operations Analyst CRA Staff David L.Jackson Executive Director Jean Jourdan Project Manager Sue Trone Operations Analyst 2740 Bayshore Drive,Unit 17• Naples,Florida 34112 P:(239)843-1115•F:(239)775-4458 www.colliercra.com 10B 4 COPY 2008 GRANT AGREEMENT - zA3 • GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CRA AND OWNER FOR SHORELINE STABILIZATION IMPROVEMENT FOR BAYSHORE/GATEWAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT AREA THIS AGREEMENT ENTERED this day of W1 , gbO g by and between the Collier unty Community Redevelopment Age y (hereinafter referred to as "CRA")and M 0.( t 1-ved'I' . (hereinafter referred to as"Owner"). WITNES SETH: WHEREAS, in Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-38, the Board of County Commissioners delegated authority to the CRA to award and administer CRA grants including contracts with owners for CRA grants;and WHEREAS, CRA Resolution No. 07-55 established the Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant;and WHEREAS, Owner has applied for a Shoreline Stabilization Grant in the amount of 51000,0 0 dollars;and WHEREAS,the CRA has determined that Owner meets the eligibility requirements and was approved for a grant award in the amount of S,v o 0.0 0 dollars on , J0 ("CRA Approval"), which is 8 % of the costs to the shoreline improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other valuable consideration,the parties agree as follows: 1. Owner acknowledges to the CRA that Owner has received a copy of the Collier County Community Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant Program referred to as "Grant Program'), that Owner has read the Grant Program, and that Owner has had ample opportunity to discuss the Grant Program with Owner's counsel or advisor. Owner further acknowledges to the CRA that Owner understands and agrees to abide by all of the terms and conditions of the Grant Program. Owner agrees to the terms and conditions of the Grant Program. 2. Owner is the record owner of property described as 2-esq $e cat AV o, R.-30thil. 3. Owner has agreed to make certain improvements to the property pursuant to the grant application submitted to the CRA dated no) o, g.Ing attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 4. Owner agrees to complete the construction of the Shoreline Stabilization • Improvements within one(1)year of CRA Approval. Owner also agrees to fund at least 50%of the costs of the shoreline improvements. • Shoreline Stabilization Grant Agreement FY2008 1 1013 2008 GRANT AGREEMENT 5. CRA has approved a grant to Owner in the amount of $ S,000 •o 0 to be administered pursuant to the terms of this Agreement based on an estimated cost of t.000 to 0 . If the actual costs are less than the estimated costs to construct the shoreline improvements and less than $5,000, the grant amount shall be reduced dollar for dollar in matching CRA funds as determined by ratio of matching private funds required. 6. Unless prior disclosure is included in the grant application, no Owner, or any immediate relative of Owner, shall serve as a contractor or subcontractor for the construction of the shoreline improvements and no Owner, or any immediate relative of Owner, shall receive compensation for labor for the construction of the shoreline improvements. An immediate relative of Owner shall include mother, father,brother, sister, aunt,uncle and cousin or family member by marriage to include mother-in-law,father-in-law,brother-in-law and sister-in-law. 7. Owner agrees to obtain all necessary Corps of Engineers, Department of Environmental Protection permits and submit any required plans to the County's Community Development and Environmental Services Division. Upon completion of the work, Owner shall submit to the CRA staff a project summary report,two(2) 8 x 10 after photos,a list of materials and construction techniques used, a list of architects and/or contractors, and any other information specific to the project or requested by the CRA staff. The CRA, through its staff, shall confirm that the shoreline improvements were constructed pursuant to the terms of the application approved by the CRA. 8. Within forty-five (45) days after confirmation that the shoreline improvement were constructed pursuant to the terms of the approved application, Owner shall be issued a check in the amount of the grant However,if Owner fails to make the improvements pursuant to the terms of the approved application,or if the project is not completed within one(1)year of CRA approval,or if Owner fails to fund at least 50%of the cost of the shoreline improvements, the grant shall be deemed revoked and Owner shall be entitled to no funding. 9. This Agreement shall be governed and construed pursuant to the laws of the State of Florida. • 10. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties and their representatives and agents, and incorporates all prior understandings, whether oral or written. No change, modification or amendment, or any representation, promise or condition, or any waiver, to this Agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized officer of the party to be charged. 11. This Agreement is personal to Owner,and may not be assigned or transferred by Owner or to Owner's respective heirs,personal representatives,successors or assigns without the prior written consent of the CRA. Shoreline Stabilization Grant Agreement FY2008 2 . 10B • : 2008 GRANT AGREEMENT IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties have executed this Agreement on the date and year first written above. OWNER(s • / (1)4 By: P, au, riAl Atiolg ..rtne:.: Signature ► gut' Tr.orf --- 1aHIAJ V.1l//Dri( ee , hi aryAtuethgeg Printed/Typed Name Printed/Fyped Name • (2) )J ±. /tit 1 rA By: Witness Sb i . ,S1-1421 (j).a.2614 Name Printed/Typed Name . ..,.. .., 'AtiTteg,67.0:',:.'•' .. COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY GHTE:. • a."..C1erk REDEVELO AGENCY r'rr, rs, vy;l'..�` 1,...7,'") 3: T4 OrrruLd el/4a DO A FIALA,Chairman 4c 1ohture on 1 r Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: 404 w FLORIDA linty of COWER I HAM CI:R11 1t THAT this in a!tweed r• 771• j2b1di.. td :erred copy of a document on,fHe In MarjodelL Student-Stirling Board Minutes and Reams of ,, ,1; Assistant County Attorney Nrra 88 my ti-nu end Off- .26,. yof .,_! _ )R - 't-��'•••; ,: Wit . BROG a: 0'iy'°' ' JyY I ti. ` t •Shoreline Stabilization Grant Agreement FY2008 3 10B 'Tan 1(260 COPYc _ 2.-+ zodg BAYSHORE Gt-TEW Y TRIANGLE ,,,, . . . . _ _____ v. . I I , .'i!_ , n ul i EB BEi • lr COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPLICATION I i :E1!I N E STABUZAT1OP,. GRANT 01 / 2008 Mary .A Luedtke 2854 Becca Avenue Naples, Florida 34112 1o . Memo to File From Sue Trone Date:05/07/2008 RE:Mary A.Luedtke's Power of Attorney held by Randal J.Luedtke This Shoreline Stabilization Grant is for a property in the name of Mary A.Luedtke.Due to a family emergency she is unable to sign the documents.Her husband,Mr.Randal J. Luedtke,has her Power of Attorney and has signed the documents on her behalf The following two pages verify the Power of Attorney. 10 [ 2008 GRANT APPLICATION SHORELINE STABILIZATION IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM General Provisions The Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) created the Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant Program to provide financial assistance to residential and commercial property owners in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area by offering financial assistance for shoreline stabilization (rip-rap, bulkhead or seawall) improvement . projects. Improvements must be along one or more sides of the deeded property. All improvements must meet the criteria listed below as well as the current requirements of the land development code, building code, construction inspections and permits, any applicable zoning overlays, and permits from US Army Corp of Engineers, Florida Department of Environmental Protection,and Collier County. The CRA is funded by Tax Increment Financing(TIF),a capture of Collier County's property taxes above the year 2000 property tax value. TIF is a unique tool that CRAs can use to leverage public funds and to promote private sector activity on the shoreline: • The Grant is a"limited"two(2)year program funded in fiscal years 2008&2009 budgets. All approved applicants will have twelve(12)months to complete their project from the date of Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approval. • For residential and commercial properties within the project boundary,the CRA will provide up to 50%but not to exceed$5,000.00 of the cost of installation and/or maintenance of"RIP RAP,"bulkheads and seawalls on subject property. The funding awarded will be leveraged by the personal financial contribution made by each applicant/property owner as well as the extent of improvements to be made.All applications will include two written proposals from qualified contractors to complete the improvements,and all required permits as required by Corps of Engineers(COE),Department of Environmental Protection(DEP)and Collier County. All proposed work must be approved before beginning any work. Grant funding is not retroactive. All work must be completed within one year of approval by CRA.Applicants are required to request a meeting with st 'prior to submittal of application. All shoreline work to be completed under this program must.be: • Reviewed and recommended for approval by the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA Local Advisory Board, • Pre-approved by any applicable county departments that would normally review such improvements, and • Pre-approved by the CRA Board. Eligibility:All properly owners with parcels within the project area are eligible for grant funds for installation and/or maintenance of"RIP RAP,"bulkheads and seawalls. Properties must be within.the Haldeman Creek MSTU boundary and also within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA boundary and abutting tidal canals including Haldeman Creek and its tributaries. See attached project area map. Excluded areas are lakes,ponds,water retention areas,swales and dsir sg ditches. Shore ine Stabilization improvement Grant FY2008 1 2008 GRANT APPLICATION I B Project Evaluation: All projects will be evaluated based upon the following: • Possession of two licensed contractor bids/quotes • Possession of required permits(Corps of Engineers,Department of Environmental Protection,and Collier County) • Ability to fund and begin work immediately • Ability to complete project within one year • Remedy of code enforcement problems PROCESS Step 1:Applicant must make application to: • First make application to the US Army Corp of Engineers for permit. The offices for this area are US Army Corp of Engineers,P.O.Box 4970,701 San Marco Blvd.,Jacksonville,FL 32232-0019.Telephone: 904-232-2241, Fax: 904-232-1213. Application is available on line at www.usace.armv.mit • After permit issuance by US Army Corp of Engineers, applicant will contact the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and make application for permit Offices located at:FDEP, South District,2295 Victoria Avenue, Suite 364,Ft.Myers, FL 33902-2549.Telephone: 239-332-6975.Application is available on line at www.dep.state.f1.11s/waterAvetlandslerp/lorms.htm • Upon completion of permitting from US Army Corp of Engineers and Florida Department of Environmental Protection application will be made to the Collier County Permitting Department located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,FL 34104. • Note: Some local contractors will provide all permitting for the contracted job. Additional fees could be applied to original estimate. Consult your contractor. Step 2: • Shoreline Improvement Grant Application(all permits must be submitted with application) • Project Initiation and Completion Form • Two 8 x 10 color photos of the existing shoreline("before"photos) • Sketch of proposed improvements • Submit two(2)written estimates/quotes from qualified/licensed contractors Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant FY200S 2 10P 2008 GRANT APPLICATION Step 3:CRA Staff and Advisory Board Review • CRA staff reviews application and then places the application on agenda of next Advisory Board meeting • Advisory Board checks project to make sure it meets all grant criteria and Redevelopment Plan criteria • Applicant is required to be present at the Advisory Board meeting to answer any questions that may arise during the review or to provide additional material if requested • If project meets all criteria,the Advisory Board makes a recommendation to CRA to approve the application • Grant funding is limited to a one-time application per parcel Step 4:CRA Review and Approval • CRA staff prepares Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant Agreement for the CRA to review and approve • Applicant signs Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant Agreement • Application with Advisory Board recommendation and agreement placed on CRA agenda for review and approval • CRA reviews Advisory Board recommendation and agreement during regular meeting and approves or denies project Step 6:Project Work • Applicant begins work and completes same in twelve(12)months Step 7:Project Completion and Submittal of Project Summary Report • Upon completion of work and after all inspections have been completed to insure work conforms to the work that was proposed,applicant submits: o "Project Summary Report,"including description of completed improvements, two 8X10 color"after"photos,contractor invoices,list of materials and construction techniques used,list of contractors and any additional information specific to the project. • Notarized"Payment Request Form"and all materials receipts and/or canceled checks as proof that all materials and contracted improvements have been paid Step 8:CRA Staff Submits Project Completion Report for Payment • CRA Staff visits site and documents improvements. • CRA Staff forwards Completion Report and documents to County for payment. Shoreline S1abffizaiion Improvement Chant FY2008 3 106 • 2008 GRANT APPLICATION SHORELINE STABILIZATION IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION Section 1: Applicant Information Owner Name: Yr]4.r A . L I�eGQ �Gi 1Q, Owner Address: Coq 4-1- a i t V r 'r '0CYYIA+f. (N 4 6310 Site Address(if different from owner address): 2g9 ge cr c,, Avunit-t Naples Z- Legal Description of Site: 341.64 o 0 b 'D ev.v.ww &Art(► Lois Daytime Phone: C2?) &q' - '3-- Alternate Phone: E-Mail Address: How long have you owned this property? y 2a.-eS Number of Years in Business at Site Address: Occupational License Number: First Time Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant Applicant? Yes [ [to If no,how many applications submitted? Grant(s)awarded?Yes [] No E Shoreline Sadxiii�ian Improvement Grant FY2008 4 108 Details Page 1 of 1 Property Record I Aerial I Sketches I a Current Ownership a I Folio No.1 29830200006 1 Property Address/2854 BECCA AVE I Owner Na LUEDTKE,MARY A Addressee 8947 MADRID DR Clan DEMOTTE 1 State/IN I Zip/46310.9411 I Leger DEMERE LANDING LOTS 8+7 I Section I Township I R Range e I Acres I No. 0 264100 8 rap N . Sub No. I 284100 I DEMERE LANDING 11 AllibeaMaa I I Ma IU a.Cod. 1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 111 14.1874 2007 Preliminary Tax Roll Latest Sales History (Subject to Change) If all Values shown below equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Land Value $103,680.00 Date Book-Page I Amount + kn• • • Value $214 888.00 0512005 4042-2400 $600,000.00 s Market Value 3 318 368.00 0612000 2588-2896 ;130,000.00 - SOH Exam• Value $0.00 iv Assessed Value $318 •• 00 - Homestead and other Exam• Value $0.00 • Taxable Value $318 388.00 SOH-'Saw Our Homes"exempt value due to cap on assessment Increases. COMOI The Information Is Updated Meekly. httpJ/www.collierappraiser.com/RecordDetail.asp?Map=&FolioID=0000029830200006 9/4/2007 Collier County Property Appraiser 108 P 1 of 1 • YAP:J LE SMALL I MEU:UM I LARGE I n j ' I 41 Introduction I i' ; r l', a G '� ?o,ia Layers f '?s �J' • L III egend + 41 Print t - �'r � 's- _ I ,. 7j j ��j ' r f An:1 Help FeedBack ,G I'. �t CIF, f i 'm,. r."t' ) ` fi_ aW Ce ual Prop+lyApp er,ti Fss.FL I , 0�...,.,.,.? It 1. V Aed Aerial Photography:January Urban-2007-Rural-2007 b- Sale rol Page Refreshed at 9/4/100710:26:09 AM htto://maps.collieraouraiser.com/webmap/Map2.aspx?msize=S&folio=29830200006 9/4/2007 10 B 2008 GRANT APPLICATION Section 2: Project Information Existing Condition of Project(attach additional sheets if necessary): C xN Nxot 4, n k In owe vine 50 ''1A4,-1) C. ATTACH `BEFORE"PHOTOS AT LAST TWO 8X10 COLOR PHOTOS, OTBERS MAY BE ADDED 70 AC'CURATE.LYDESCRIBE THE SITE). Outline Proposed Improvements in Detail(attach additional sheets if necessary): 2e.vvleAre (Dk flock S i&u cLU . Pei texc ,4.,Q NAA1 Sea wcill v ul c/ . Aikb ,,, - ie., f;1( c,c vie. ApA List Materials to be Used and Construction Methods to be Utilized(i.e. Slope,type of rock, underlayment,bulkhead type,etc.)(attach additional sheets if n1 ) n c k $-eI�1 r ,om ib c.t. 60«, a Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant FY2008 5 10 B t .,,. . . .. ,.. :,:. ,41-4-::- I •. ,,.„, .. , ,,, , • .. , z.. ,_,, , , .. • ., . ,„;:12- 1 ,..-.. • ,,,. _ 7 , i. . .., i 0' •.,-:-•;\ - .., .. . _• " -....1 I.: k4SH .‘ . .... ,.::.. , ,!;,1 -,C'':•.'Pec,-, ,t.: 3 -•.1 ,If...4%'f ii.:':::?4. '',,_, . . ,,, ., ..,,,.. it' f 1 i r•! - . • -.,:-% 1.0•41P . nitial ••. .,i 7 11,1k , . - - k ' , •-■41Irsi . -'-,•-=e"g,: „...:1: ... , . : ,,aik filli' --.-, - . .•• a'' • 4 • ,Itil • - :,-,01,rill .i.211111v, ' • riai .04 saw asf ....'4.,4.,:..\, • 1 4,-,, . i 4... . *Imo mow 0 ,, , . . , A %Ow. as GI „ • ' -A., ,11, ,;,.., - \ h,. t Iii liSt,24111•811 •;,, . 7:11RitAil.. .. ..* • - -' • - /k-•!-. Erl Wil ■ . s '-', I 4'-' cr"ii,C;1 • , , , . • '414 e. . ' ' ,,-1- '-'6. • ,;:.,,A --.. - , : , , _ .,,, .. imik : ' -,.::: , 1',..,7d : . ,..; ',..■ ,'Jo, , , - •/. .-4- i ,.,/,, g w mat:)'A..-:,-.9•,-i ,P•-• ._,,J,f2 .4 '-.',,, {, i,,- • . • - n.t,- $is SIP /„y..1'. tt!,, • tr'?c ..".,..,Gr.pc.1,,- , .:,0: t . .1 ' ii 15 ikli i;-_,4,C4•:)+Iial,,:.'021-31 :7' ' '1 , 4 .,k '41 -,1 a iik II , - Ift-'1'iiiik 1/I lib %Is „,\:',,1-7: '-'-' ' ,7"‘-`7'. ‘.‘,.•'''.:"'• .- . •• .44,-. 01•.. ,,L.s., -;. :.. .-.. ..., ,..,,,• , •,.-... =.-. .,...-.:,,**1''.2.,'i,,,A5 s, !awl, .• „, :, -.L, ,.-:,,, .,„ .,, , '-'3 • ' ' •. ,'ii'.., lif•-4.ti,' %gat , . , • . '"..- ''. 4.1, 11,i; III1 ‘`'. '•"' C..,,• ''.. -''.. ..,'-' . '., •' ' ' 4 AI,frk,,,ifit "%II . .• - .c. .-..,- ' . , ._:... ', '''i'li`V,11 likw,Voekk ... , ' •, .. , .' , . . - ' ....., • 's4''41% 1111'lk la .••2'.-,- :'- .'., ".'',--, ' h =..,(.1.4 A:i-ft. ,Illiilk IB,2'..• , ',, ' -Y''.: --•, '.. • .,, .,' ' 471%''' It '' '' wN't l'''' 611 Ikliti ----...• '.. '','"fti-••'..:',,;:...Y. ..' ,•-. '''i 1'• ...il'S ' .:,, '.,• ,, '., . ''''t=1,,..■ \ ,110111 i, IV ..-`.. 'I, ••r,,' •'':13„',,_':' •. . ..•• •''''.,-....4.,1:1i ' ''•;1 k Vii VI ‘.L.,Vii.' ' . ' - '-'r A. ' 1•.''' ' •'' ' , ,-.,..::'.',.,.:1,- ,c,, 4 ,,,,,,v,, . ,. -,',1,.,,i.s'.,• , ! '„,.., , ,, L ' . " 1 VIVA w'4. IL, , ' . ,in:i11.4'1 1 • ' ' , -'''', -.".A4•, i ....AVM* -1L• ...'. ',,,' r'' 1.'4'.15.■T`• ' ' • . - -."- ',..•.. . ....„. ....,' \ t SM.,1111. ,- A•<''' 4i,\.(,;,`, j' c ''' i j ,... ,q, t'' i ii ,, ' .: •' ., ' ,•• -'`' ';'..*.l..`tti Ik:fe SOIL -,-,...: , , • -• .:','....•,-.--:2,4-At.,A , . .■ +J ._ . . . . • .i..,.4''III .%,6t,.. 't _0 lip, -. • - -':-.:7-A, ',,,,'el!, I% • VIP. im. .... a , . -,.,.,,,:,„;:.,,,r,...=:-..„.::,„I:4ST,,,A,.-4 A ''F • ‘li , ,1„.-..,•',,1::"..,::::':::t-r.r.,:.•:',qYvi.,"'' Ableii. XI% 111 11 . -':•''',,,•;.,:;•;,....,,,-:.:;'.,'''1--.- . 3. '•,. — X . . . . .. '.. • .",...,'.:=.4.''''.f...:,'.s'''''.•••:,,".•...;:,4,'''.,.•,' „i,:(4N 1,tow LT F '.:14'.'''': t'' '. ',..2.'"',.• /6,-. ,r-'' 'kei 'N tiklit. • , .._-.,-.<,,...,.,-.;.-,.;-,...'''...-,. ' ','' le''i' ) c:,s."' • . ,j.i7:::',.:::`,.1%"•;;.,..,.:-....444. ...;t.' ,,,,,i,,,i''-, ) 0(4 fo. Tea II;i*-,:k-,-- ''''*";-''''•:-..4•-• .,,,,tk :.- '', *If 0 ti, \ s IL ..4&',‘,.---.,-...;:r ..'.4.k. '-...ki. ',... ' ‘1.alik ,. , 4.41A in ■ :',.^11k-"i;t:' '',7ker '.14.;1''11.■'4.', to:4 0 Vita'!. la gi lb IL . I 111 -;:-.;',,r,;.,),..,,,,■ 4,,:,...,*.a:,:,.:Y;:"-,..,4,61,„41A.`-..;; : ' 0..tiet:' :'113 4,1„ n -'2.(,,,,,,,,, -,1. ..,,,,_,.41,...ip. =4:,.J.i,, ,, ■t-Lo -,"1,40, ik fi . i i ±i.'-' -..,*"-,,,-."4 -.i.'..f.'.--:';'',.Y.',-,L.`( ,.,1 ' G.vc? • .',,,.„ ' Ism'- - - ,,,i...,-.,',..,,-;:,,t,:-i.4' :•----...,,,3. 1,.4i,v• • 7- ' (fut te - - e ,‘, ;,,,, ,..,,,"70,•,.,:,..4", -A-f-",,,,,v,..! 0•,.1: :11,7,1,,,$,..,.tJ ' . - " '.6' ' 4'.''..'-,..17'''.'.:■_"All,,,G.e.,,, ,-4..,,,, ,. .-ii,,.. "e I■0 A Uli .4'.. ' -I. - . . . ,. 1 0 B .1, .. . . .,...,•5,;,...., _ ... ...41/41 , .4 • - ,•:, 1 i. "4:-e• j 1 - • • 1' . . 111 t,. ....." - . , .. :.„, .;,..,.._.,.4.N: •.2, ., . . . E-- a/11 ,i, :. I I kil ' 1: - \ot). I I ' • I, ' 1 i , .. . . .. . ,. fr...I.'. ..:-.:!;•-,.. 3 , .,.. ' .. •\11111 ill Ill I. I I ' . .t", . it 11 k ji" .0 . I 1 .. * . . ■ it,!, ■ Or , . . , 7 •, , , . .. gillisk t Vii .'). . h • . :. . . , I . . id ktilii‘l ., ''.i''1' -1,..-':3. i:,iii ■ - ii. • ,,,,,,,,,.. , . k., .. , A ..‘ i a ih., , .. .. .v, t(." .=- • .; .'.. • 11117111. III Illir Ilik. .r.- •v....:1, .P.:;'..--';41:::'14:_,::,::1' iv -(-• . .. VA I 111 1 i „I-,-.....74 4 f'• . . •• t. i A!.' V.\-i.f.', . .r: 421 ,,.. :. 10B 2008 GRANT APPLICATION Section 3: Project Cost Information Estimated Project Cost: • ALL WORE'TO BE COMPLETED BYA LICENSED CONTRACTOR • APPLICATION MUST HAVE AT LEAST TWO(2) WRITTENESTBIATBS OR QUOTES ATTACHED TO THE APPLICATION • COPIES OF FLORIDA/COLLIER COUNTY CONTRACTORS LICENSE AND COLLIER COUNTY OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE MUST BE ATTACHED TO ESTIMATES/QUOTES Estimated Requested from CRA$ i O O a (up to 50%of the total project cost(bulkheads,seawalls,rip rap,installation and/or repairs only), up to,but not exceeding$5,000.) • COPIES OF ALL RECEIPTS AND/OR CANCELED CHECKS WILL BE REQUIRED UPON PROJECT COMPLETION AS PROOF THAT ALL MATERLUS AND CONTRACTED IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN PAIA NO REIMBURSEMENT WILL BE MADE BY THE CRA UNTIL ALL RECEIPTS'AND/OR CANCELED CHECES HAVE BREN RECEIVED AND VERIFIED FoaCRAIIss ONLY Total Estimated Project Cost: /000,°° Request from CRA: �J,b00 . d 0 Percentage of Total: (7° R °- 19- 1-11 Aott‘a • ••"er Signature Date ,076 Owner Signature Date Date Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Gant FY2008 6 lOB 2008 GRANT APPLICATION PROJECT INITIATION AND COMPLETION FORM (to be submitted with Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant Application) I, Mal A-. Lie4'1-4— , owner of the property located at 2? c* eze.a.11'v+C N'ap(psiR3ttv, have the funding and capability necessary to begin the shoreline improvements listed under Section 2 of the completed Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant application and have the ability to complete all improvements within one year of the approval of the Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant by the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency. /A e mp �i 6--6-015 ignature o Date Signature of Owner Date NOTARY STATE OF: VIP 2-; 0 G. COUNTY OF: VI)t\I RA The foregoing Owner Authorization F• s' as -• vatted • -1 • me this day of 111 at oIYS"f $.t CCO2 q�by 0.10�S,� d who: ,owner of the property located is personally known by me OR g7 ,*>e who has produced �L-L-29.010 li as proof of identity. Affix notary seal �.� .1 ( , •NOTARY I BLJC.STATE 0a?note :, Public A•ignature) ripS6il bL C�rda n ap=THUATLANTICHQmQ10CO3,DfC Print Name dfNotary Public • Commission No: My Commission expires: Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant FY2008 7 10B . . D. S. I. General Contractors, Inc.,TIA Dock Savers T!A Docksavers 1417 SE 47th Ter. 1 Cape Coral,FL 33904 Phone: 239-898-1676 Fax: 239-542-6803 License#CGC1511928 ROPOSAL Ma Lnanke 4/22/1008 2854 Baca Ave. S.Naples,P1 239-398-3707 Supply all labor Irncl materials Its the Following: SEAWALI4 TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF HEWING SBAWAIL AND INST. I 1. Install 47' seawall 10'x 5'x 6'concrete slabs. l I To include: All labor and materials to install seawall. Cap and tiebacks using 4,000 psi concrete and epoxy coated rebar. , Fill dirt hauled to the jobsite floc baddfliag and grading. • ` h (3 Rip Rap if rn"/�J LiPT p1LINGS: f(9 / 06° � 1. Remove replace existing lift. 2. Install(4) lift pilings. All pilings to be(2.5ccs)praesoie treated pc"brtgs. 3. Wrap pilings with 5'black poly wrap. Installed with 1 1/2"STAINLESS STEEL calls. i DOCK: 5X30'TO INCLUDE: 1. Install 8"dock pilings as needed ter new dock. 2. Install 2" 260cca)rough sawn pressure treated header and stringers. Install with 20D 11130 and U2"carriage bolts. 3. Install 2"x,6""Langdale"decking with 3"STAINLESS STEEL screws. 4. Contractor Irlll remove all debris from property and maintain a clean warkelte. 5. Refbrn es1 �c ates of insurance supplied upon request(USLerli) 6. Docksav will pull all and pay Dr all necessary permits. 7. Customer pay all and any engineering fees and any needed survey work. 8. All and any electrical and plumbing to be done by others. HOLD - • 1 :--5CLAUSE: Owner agrees •hold Doobavees banning for any damage to swimming pool,underground utilities, apriniders and .• ,., ,: Docbaveas agrees to use duo diligence in all areas of work perlbsmed. Landscaping:,..sod replacement to remain impossibility of the owner. Seawall panels •be pounded to rased. If rock is ea000ntaed contactor to Bing in dfittent equipment topunch/drill , rock for a proper ibotlngfor an additional$39500 per hour. I S . - • VERS WILL BEAT OR MATCH ANY COMPETITORS PRICE 10B D. S. 1. General Contractors,Inc.,T/A Dock Savers T/A Docisavers 1417 SE 47th Ter. • Cape Coral,FL 33904 Phone: 239-898-1676 Pax: 239-542-6803 License 11 CGC1511928 ROPOSAL Mary L e moos 2854 Bea A S.Naples,Fl 239-398-3707 • PAYMENT $5,000.00 with :4 contract. 1/3 once barge ., 1/3 once panels: >installed. Balance upon ocmpletion. TOTAL. .........___._.....S65,000.00 ACCE TED DATE • • 0 VERS WILL BEAT OR MATCH ANY COMPETITORS PRICE • 10B 'di col '-. 0 e , . I N 5 P,:g,,i) u; ca. a 1 tr."`;.i.IF 0 e- M • EtT84 <1 a mo ii i -1 ., .0.. ., 2 g g 1 i 'k' . `' CM Hi II A . . r 1 r g Z. P P,.. '• 8 pt.. I t's . \ : 1 ;, ‘ 1 tli` *,.. 7* . 1 t g ki w 1 1,\-1 1 1 it:1 b, II= .-"! ,ii. .k, 1. ;) og is P , LI t iz. : if. 1, 1 ■A % i .kk= ,- 1 [ 1 , 481 0 . 4 4 1 !, ft ,: , ' t- gg. . $ : . . I 10B D. S. I. General Contractors, Inc.,T/A Dock Savers T/A Docksavers • 1417 SE 47th Ter. Cape Coral,FL 33904 Phone: 239-898-1676 Paso 239-542-6803 • License#C0C1511928 PROPOSAL Randylf Latiake-Ac 2854 Becca Ave 4/2212008 S.Naples,111 . 239-398-3707• Supply all1abor and materials for the following: SEAWAUL:TO INCLUDE REMOVAL OF EXl IlNO SEAWALL AND INSTALL NSW. 1. Install 47i of seawall using 10'x 5'x 6'concrete dabs. To include: Ali labor and materials to install seawall. Cap and tiebacks using 4,000 psi concrete and epoxy coated rebar. Fill dint hauled to the Jobsite for bacidilling and grading. Rip-Rap if required. LIFT AND PILING: 1. Remove aid replace eacisdng lift. 2. Install(4)110"lift pilings. All pilings to be(2.3cca)pressure treated pilings. • 3. Wrap pilI igs with 5'black poly wrap. Installed with 1 Ir2"STAINLESS STEEL DOCK s X 30'TO INCLUDE: 1. Install 8" ptliugs as needed for new dock. 2. Install 2" 8"(.60cca)rough sawn pressure treated headers and stringers. Install with 20D r• r nails and I/2"carriage bolts. 3. install 2" 6""Langdale"decidng with 3"STAINLESS STEEL screws. 4. a, • , ' remove all debris from property and maintain a clean woriksite. 5. • -, .•- and certificates of insurance supplied upon request(US &H) 6. •...•. will pall all andpay for all necessary perndts. 7. Customer .pay all and any engineering fees and any needed survey work. 8. AR and dec rival and plumbing to be done by others. ! • BOLD • r .ztv--CLAUSE: Owner agrees hold Docksavea harmless for any damage to swimming pool,underground utilities, sparkler and • Docksavers agrees to use due diligence in all areas of work perlbrmed. Landscaping •• sod replacement to renaln responsibility of the owner. Seawall panda .be pounded to refusal. If rock is encountered contactor to bring hi dli sent equipment to punch/MU rock for a proper footing for an additional$395.00 per hour. • • VERS WILL BEAT OR MATCH ANY COMPETITORS PRICE • • 108 D. S. I..General Contractors, Inc., T/A Dock Savers • T/A Doc savers 1417 SE 47th Ter. Cape Coral,FL.33904 Phone 239-898-1676 • Fax 239-342-6803 Licence#CGC1511928 PROPOSAL Randy l.ued,4k,� 2854 Beoca Ave. 4/22n008 S.Naples,F1 239-398-3707 PAYMENT SCHEDULE: $5,000.00 with signed contract. 1/3 once barge arrives. 1/3 once panels are installed. Balance upon completion. • TOTAL..... �....._ .......» 465,000.00 ACCEPTED ; ! _ DATE • • • • DOCKSAVERS WILL BEAT OR MATCH ANY COMPETITORS PRICE O'fi .nnw w.w ww� 109 2008 GRANT APPLICATION PAYMENT REQUEST FORM (PROJECT COSTS) (attach all receipts,invoices and/or cancelled checks) ° On 5 / /260 ° , the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency approved a portion of the following improvements(50%of the total up to$5,000)to be funded through the Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant Program: Improvement Cost ,Sea,v a. r' fetal*c- V 6, o 0 0. o0 Total # 65; 660. g a COPIES OF ALL RECEIPTS AND/OR CANCELED CHECKS WILL BE REQUIRED UPON PROJECT COMPLETION AS PROOF THAT ALL MATERIALS AND CONTRACTED IMPRO VEMEPI TS HA PR BEEN PA ID.NO REIMBURSEMENT WILL BE MADE BY ME CRA UNTIL COPIES OF CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. I hereby confirm that all items listed above have been completed as per the Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant application submitted to the CRA and authorized by the CRA Therefore, I am requesting the approved funding in the total amount of $ / 0 d ( ,v u as approved by the CRA. The foregoing Payment Request Form was executed before me this 0 day of _cgfiettikt4_,2005 by / Ledike owner of the property located at al Its /112h5 ,35#0Z. ,who: is personally known by me OR _"/� who has produced �Qc VtIS U021d( as proof of identity. Affix notary seal / t Notary Publi ) NOTARY POBLIC3TATE OF FLORIDA f Shirley Garcia Expires: pM.g� 21,2 Print Name of Notary Public scabs"' r6RVATUlmcsoteeto co,we Commission No: My Commission expires: Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant FY2008 9 108 2008 GRANT APPLICATION PROJECT SUMMARY REPORT FORM (Submit after project completion) A Describe Condition of Project: � °fX,c.)ate d,e/41,La e C( 3 Co//ark/ k • o ATTACH "AFTER" PHOTOS (INCLUDING AT LEAST TWO 8X10 COLOR PHOTOS, OTHERS MAY BE ADDED TO ACCURATELY DESCRIBE THE SHORELINE IMPROVEMENTS). List Materials and Construction Methods used,especially if unique methods were necessary to preserve or enhance some aspects of the improved site(attach additional sheets C Ni�ss and Contact Information for Contractors Involved to Provide Proper Credit frociii-err _ Provide any other important information specific to the project. All projects will be listed in the annual project report of the CRA so details and noteworthy information about the project is very critical. ti Po A m 9- s-o Owner Signateu'e Date* • Owner Signature Date Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant FY2008 8 108 G.'UHT Y i ITEM NO.: ° FILE NO.: ROUTED TO: �'C/" ` ! o D Y S'7 DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS SPACE(Ong.9/89;Rev.6/97) REQUEST FOR LEGAL SERVICES (Please type or print) Date: 05/07/2008 To: Office of the County Attorney,Attn:M.Student-Stirling From: Sue Trone Operations Analyst (Name) (Title) CRA Bayshore Gateway (Division) (Department) Telephone#(Very Important): 643-1115 Re: Shoreline Stabilization Grant application for Mary A. Luedtke for her property at 2854 Becca Avenue. (Subject) BACKGROUND OF REQUEST/PROBLEM: (Describe problem and give background information-be specific,concise,and articulate.) This Shoreline Stabilization Grant(SSG)is for a property in the name of Mary A.Luedtke.She was unable to come here to sign off on the documents due to an on-going family emergency in Indiana;therefore,her husband,Randal J.Luedtke signed for her.Mr.Luedtke has Power of Attorney for Mrs.Mary Luedtke and I am endosing the documentation of the POA. (Are there documents or other information needed to review this matter? Ryes,attach and reference this information.) This item has/has not been previously submitted. pQ.7 (If previously submitted provide County Attorney's Office File No.) 1�`L J ✓ ACTION REQUESTED: _J P (Be very specific. Identity exactly what you need in the way of legal services.) I 008. I want to get this on the May 27 agenda. Please review an sign the agreement. Call me when ready and I will pick it up. OTHER COMMENTS: Thank you. cc: David Jackson (An requests must be copied to your appropriate Division Head or Constitutional Officer.) `ala(0c _14J mu(LAX f 10B Agenda Item No. 1664 February 24,2009 Page 1 of 16 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To approve and execute Shoreline Stabilization Grant Agreement(s) between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency and a Grant Applicant(s) within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment area.(2772 Riverview Drive) OBJECTIVE: To approve and execute a Shoreline Stabilization Grant Agreement(s)between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and a Grant Applicant(s) within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment area(2772 Riverview Drive). CONSIDERATIONS: Annually, the Community Redevelopment Agency's Shoreline Stabilization Grant Program is funded at a level that satisfies existing grant obligations from prior fiscal years and future grant opportunities. The purpose of the grant program is to provide an incentive to revitalize the area by providing a matching grant to encourage the private sector to upgrade/rehabilitate the shoreline of waterfront property. The grant requires applicants to provide a project cost-match of at least 50% with the remaining project dollars supported by Tax Increment dollars generated from the CRA District.For FY 09,a total of$320,000 is budgeted for all grant programs. From this allocation, $302,500 is available for new projects and $17,500 is committed and due to previously approved applicants upon satisfaction of all grant stipulations. The Shoreline Stabilization Grant application submitted by William C. King, owner of the property at 2772 Riverview Drive, Naples Florida, 34112 was recommended for approval by the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Local Advisory Board. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney Office and is sufficient for Board consideration and approval. This item is not quasi-judicial and therefore no ex parte disclosure is required. This item requires a simple majority vote. (MMSS) FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient budget exists within the FY 09 Bayshore Gateway Triangle Fund (187)to satisfy this new grant application.A Shoreline Stabilization Grant may fund up to 50%of the applicant's project cost up to a ceiling of$5,000. This shoreline stabilization project totals $28,405.00 and the grant request is$5,000 which is 17%of the estimated project cost. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas within the County, including the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA that may consider alternative land use plans, modifications to development standards, improvements to infrastructure and incentives to encourage redevelopment. RECOMMENDATION: That the CRA Board approves and authorizes for execution the Shoreline Stabilization Grant Agreement between the Community Redevelopment Agency and William C. King, owner of the property at 2772 Riverview Drive, Naples Florida, 34112 in the amount of$5,000.00. Prepared by Sue Trone on February 10,2009 Operations Analyst,BayshorelGateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Agency - 1 - lOB Agenda Item No. 1665 February 24,2009 Page 1 of 14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY To approve and execute Shoreline Stabilization Grant Agreement(s) between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency and a Grant Applicant(s) within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment area. (2736 Riverview Drive) OBJECTIVE:,To approve and execute a Shoreline Stabilization Grant Agreement(s)between the Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) and a Grant Applicant(s) within the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment area(2736 Riverview Drive). CONSIDERATIONS: Annually, the Community Redevelopment Agency's Shoreline Stabilization Grant Program is funded at a level that satisfies existing grant obligations from prior fiscal years and future grant opportunities. The purpose of the grant program is to provide an incentive to revitalize the area by providing a matching grant to encourage the private sector to upgrade/rehabilitate the shoreline of waterfront property. The grant requires applicants to provide a project cost-match of at least 50% with the remaining project dollars supported by Tax Increment dollars generated from the CRA District. For FY 09,a total of$320,000 is budgeted for all grant programs. From this allocation, $302,500 is available for new projects and $17,500 is committed and due to previously approved applicants upon satisfaction of all grant stipulations. The Shoreline Stabilization Grant application submitted by William C. King, owner of the property at 2736 Riverview Drive,Naples Florida, 34112 was recommended for approval by the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Local Advisory Board. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney Office and is sufficient for Board consideration and approval. This item is not quasi-judicial and therefore no ex parte disclosure is required.This item requires a simple majority vote. (MMSS) FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient budget exists within the FY 09 Bayshore Gateway Triangle Fund (187)to satisfy this new grant application.A Shoreline Stabilization Grant may fund up to 50%of the applicant's project cost up to a ceiling of$5,000. This shoreline stabilization project totals $28,470.00 and the grant request is$5,000 which is 17%of the estimated project cost. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan states that redevelopment plans may be developed for specific areas within the County, including the Bayshore Gateway Triangle CRA that may consider alternative land use plans, modifications to development standards, improvements to infrastructure and incentives to encourage redevelopment. RECOMMENDATION: That the CRA Board approves and authorizes for execution the Shoreline Stabilization Grant Agreement between the Community Redevelopment Agency and William C. King, owner of the property at 2736 Riverview Drive, Naples Florida, 34112 in the amount of$5,000.00. Prepared by. Sue Trone on February 10,2009 Operations Analyst,Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Agency - 1 - 10B 11 ORDINANCE NO.08- 61 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 2002-38, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY REDEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM ORDINANCE, PROVIDING FOR: ESTABLISHMENT BY ORDINANCE OF A MODIFIED SWEAT EQUITY GRANT PROGRAM; ESTABLISHMENT BY ORDINANCE OF A MODIFIED SHORELINE STABILIZATION GRANT PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NEWLY CREATED LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NEWLY CREATED COMMERCIAL BUILDING IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on March 14, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopted Resolution No. 2000-83 creating the Community Redevelopment Agency of Collier County, Florida(CRA);and WHEREAS, on March 14, 2000, the BCC adopted Resolution No. 2000-82, which established and described the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area.aid the lmmokalee Community Redevelopment Area;and WHEREAS,on June 13,2000,the BCC adopted Ordinance No. 2000-42 establishing'tile Redevelopment Trust Fund which • ` p appropriated "incremental tax revenues" for �gmmuaity redevelopment purposes;and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2000, the BCC approved Resolution No. 2000-181 adopting a Community Redevelopment Plan for the"Community Redevelopment Area,"which included the Words underlined are added;Words euek-threugh are deleted. Page 1 of 6 0 Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area and the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area;and WHEREAS, on July 30, 2002, the BCC adopted Ordinance No. 2002-38, the "Collier County Redevelopment Grant Program Ordinance" creating a Site Improvement Grant and Impact Fee Assistance Grant for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area;and WHEREAS,on March 13,2007,the CRA approved Resolution No. 2007-55 creating the Shoreline Stabilization Improvement Grant Program and Sweat Equity Improvement Grant Program as amendments to the Site Improvement Grant Program originally established by Ordinance No.2002-38;and WHEREAS,the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA desires to establish a modified Sweat Equity Improvement Grant Program for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area by ordinance;and WHEREAS, the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA desires to establish a modified Shoreline Stabilization Grant Program for the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area by ordinance;and WHEREAS,the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA desires to encourage local area water conservation and to discourage landscaping with invasive pest plants within its CRA boundaries by creating the Landscape Improvement Grant Program to provide financial and technical assistance for residential landscape improvements and general area beautification;and WHEREAS, the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA recognizes that representatives of businesses located within its CRA boundaries have expressed interest in improving commercial buildings but the cost of such improvements have prevented them from doing so, and as an Words undszlingd are added;Words sued are deleted. Page 2 of 6 1013 incentive to commercial redevelopment desires to create a Commercial Building Improvement Grant;and WHEREAS, upon request of the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle CRA, the BCC desires to amend Ordinance No. 2002-38, as amended, in order to re-establish by ordinance the Sweat Equity Improvement Grant Program and the Shoreline Stabilization Grant Program and to establish a Landscape Improvement Grant Program and Commercial Building Improvement Grant Program within the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area using a portion of the funds in the Redevelopment Trust Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE: Title and Citation. This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Collier County Redevelopment Grant Program Ordinance". SECTION TWO: Annual Appropriation. The Board of County Commissioners shall annually, during its budget process, allocate funding for grant programs from the Redevelopment Trust Fund for the community redevelopment area. The Board of County Commissions, in its discretion, may adjust the amount allocated for grant programs at any time during its fiscal year. SECTION THREE: Adoption of Site Improvement Grant and Impact Fee Assistance Grant Programs. The Site Improvement Grant and Impact Fee Assistance Grant programs are hereby adopted. A copy of said programs are annexed to this ordinance and adopted and made a part of Words underlined are added; Words seek-through are deleted. Page 3 of 6 10B this ordinance by reference. Either Site Improvement Grant or Impact Fee Assistance Grant program may be amended by resolution of the CRA. SECTION FOUR: Adoption of the Modified Sweat Sanity Improvement Gran* Program for the Savage/Gateway Triangle Community, Redevelopment Area The Modified Swot Wit' Improvement Giant Program for the Bayshore/Gateway T ten,,'. 0 i! _ice _.i.� ,J•1!! a 1- l s 'A X12'. i _J, I !._ 1.04.111 !! i __! I./. to this Ordinance as Exhibit "A" and made a art of this Ordinance by referee. The Sweat Equity Improvement Grant Program may be amended by resolution of the CRA. SECTION FIVE:, Adoption of the Shoreline Stabilization Grant Program for the Bavehor}IGetewav Triangle ommunity Redevelopment Area The Shoreline Stabilization Grant Program for the Bayshore/Gatcwav Triangle Community Redevelopment Aregis hereby adoz)ted, A copy of the program is -_' !: ed to this Ordinance as Exhibit "B" and made a part of this_Ordinance by reference. The Shoreline Stabilization Grant Program may be amended by resolution of the CRA. SECTION SIX: Adoption of the Landman, Improvement Grant Program for the BavahorelGatewav Trlande Community Redevelopment Area The Landscape Improvement Grant Program for the Bayshore/Gatewav Triangle Community Redevelopment Area is hereby adopted. A copy of the program is annexed to this Ordinance as Exhibit "C" and made a part of this Ordinance by reference. The Landscape Improvement Grant Program may be amended by resolution of the CRA. SECTION SEVEN: Adoption of the Commercial Building Improvement Grant Progrant for the Bayshore/Gatewav Triangle Community Redevelopment Area Words underlined are added; Words ugh are deleted. Page 4 of 6 10B The Commercial Building Improvement Grant_Proara n#or the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Area is hereby adagtgad._A cony of the proparam is annexed to this Ordinance as Exhibit_"D" and made a part of this Ordinance by reference. The Commercial $uildina Improvement Grant Program may be amended by resolution of the CRA. SECTION FOUR EIGHT: Adoption of the Facade Grant Program for the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area. The Facade Grant Program for the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area is hereby adopted. A copy of said program is annexed to this ordinance and adopted and made a part of this ordinance by reference. This Facade Grant Program may be amended by resolution of the CRA. SECTION FIVE NINE: Administration by CRA. The Board of County Commissioners delegates the administration of the grant programs to the CRA including, but not limited to, selection of recipients, contracting with owners and contract enforcement. The CRA shall approve all applicants for funding after the Board of County Commissioners allocates grant program funding for each fiscal year. The recipients of any grant funds shall be required to execute an agreement in a form approved by the County Attorney's Office for legal sufficiency and approved by the CRA. SECTION SIRS ESN: Conflict and Severability. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law,the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,such portion shall be deemed a Words updasi are added; Words are deleted. Page 5of6 1 0 separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION SWAN ELEVEN:Inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION EIGHT TWELVE: Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED L by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this t day of Oda 6 ,2008. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Dwi0I4T E:BROCK,Clerk COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA sr j 4~ • ;� • 1 �iV sf,∎� t. "la"Deputy Clerk TOM i C3,CHAP -I 1Ne ti 1 Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: This ordinance filed with all• Marj a Student Stirling of Sto Offlc Assistant County Attorney Mary dry of�+••. and ocknowiedQer^wn of thot fitinp„ ived �daY ofi� 05-CMD 01233/$3 WA,Chet Words underlined are added; Words atmek-threugh are deleted. Page 6 of 6 10 " EXERBIT B PB*J_1IINjL g Bsyshore Oy Triangle CRA 1%nArr!n..S!,tNf:trmniI r,••■•!.innnly+. Shoreline Stabilization Grant Program The Shoreline Stabilization Grant(SSG)Program is a redevelopment initiative funded and administered by the Bayshore Gateway Triangle Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA)as partial reimbursement for installation or repair for shoreline stabilization improvements such as rip-rap,bulkheads,or seawalls. Overview of the Program The CRA encourages everyone with property located on Haldeman Creek to maintain a stabilized shoreline,slowing the rate of sedimentation in the canals.Owners and tenants of residential and commercial properties along Haldeman Creek within CRA boundaries we eligible to receive SSG funding for shoreline improvements.The SSG Program fiords only installation of or repair to rip-rap,bulkheads,or seawalls.Grantees are required to contribute a minimum of 50 percent of project costs with a maximum award of$5,000. Grantees have twelve months from the date of CRA approval to complete shoreline improvements.All improvements must be approved by the CRA before grantees commence improvements—no finding will be awarded for work commenced prior to CRA approval.Funds are disbursed after the completed improvements are approved by CRA staff as reimbursement. Applicant Eligibility Owners and tenants of residential and commercial properties on Haldeman Creek may apply for SSG funding.Properties("property"is defined by parcel ID number through Collier County Property Appraiser)receiving SSG funding for improvements are eligible for only one award for the life of the program. Bids for Work Grantees must obtain a minimum of two cost estimates from contractors listed in the Collier County database of actively licensed marine seawall and dock construction contractors which can be found online at http://apps2.colliergov.net/webgpps/vision/Con Cert/default.asp'.Bids from contractors not listed in this database will not be accepted for the SSG program.No funding will be awarded for"do-it-yourself'improvements or to subcontractors.The amount of the grant will be determined by the lowest bidding contractor for each improvement though grantees may actually use any licensed contractor from the database. Permitting Most contractors handle permit applications and the CRA strongly encourages grantees to give careful consideration with regard to permitting.Applicants who wish to procure permits on their own must first apply through the US Army Corps of Engineers at P.O. Box 4970,701 San Marco Boulevard,Jacksonville,Florida 32232.Applications are available online at www.usace.army.mil. 1 10B • BGTR��ii GL� Shoreline Stabilization rant Information After obtaining the appropriate permit above,applicants must apply for a permit through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection:FDEP South District,2295 Victoria Avenue,Suite 364,Fort Myers,Florida 33902.Applications are available online at www.dep.statelLus/water/wethuuls/erp/forms.htm. Upon receiving the above two permits,applicants must apply for a permit from the Collier County Permitting Department at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive,Naples,Florida 34104. Project Requirements Eligible Activities Only the installation of or repair to rip-rap,bulkheads,or seawalls is eligible for SSG funding under this program.No portion of SSG grants may be used to reimburse the grantee for construction of or repair to docks or other related amenities.Grantees who wish to construct improvements not funded through this program are encouraged to inquire about other grant programs offered by the CRA. Required Documentation for Reimbursement Grant funds are disbursed after CRA staff verify that the improvements are complete(this includes review of necessary permits).To receive reimbursement,grantees must prove that payment for the work was paid DIRECTLY to ACTIVELY LICENSED CONTRACTORS LISTED IN THE ABOVE DATABASE by personal check or credit card in the name of the grantee.Under no circumstance will payment to subcontractors or unlicensed contractors be reimbursed.Grantees must provide receipts or invoices with the payment amount clearly indicated clearly along with cancelled checks and/or credit card validations.No reimbursement will be disbursed for work paid for with cash. Change Orders and Time Extensions Change Orders to Increase Funding After the SSG agreement is executed,if a grantee discovers previously undiscovered flaws in the shoreline a change order may be issued to increase funding not to exceed the maximum award available.Change orders must be requested in time for staff to process the request and secure approval.IMPORTANT:Change orders cannot be processed within the last two weeks of the grant period. Time Extensions The CRA understands that redevelopment projects can take more time to complete than is originally anticipated.For grantees who cannot complete their projects within one year, time extensions may be granted.Grantees needing extensions must request the within two months of grant expiration.No extensions can be granted within the last two weeks of the grant period.IMPORTANT: Grantees must verify that some activities associated with the improvements have been performed at least six months after execution of the agreement. 2 108 ATTACHMENT « B» 1O81 WHY ARE SEAWALLS IMPORTANT? Seawalls perform multiple functions, all of which are important to property owners and to the City of Punta Gorda. The most important function is to protect private property from loss of land mass into the water due to erosion from drainage and wave action. Seawalls also serve navigational purposes by maintaining the proper water depth in a canal system. Another function is the seawall delineates the boundary between private property (the owner's land) and public property (the water which covers sovereign lands of a government entity). The seawall also is used to define the width of a waterway for dock and boat permitting. A properly maintained seawall will contribute to the stability of neighboring properties, provide structural support to roads and bridges and add to the value of the property. Pino...021194G014 YJ its=a�; 7 I 'I- ■,,', ,_ . I 10 B .•, u -,,, ..•..,. , . :•,•, . _.•. I • y,.. •,i , . .. ,i • ' '-',..;,,.. ..,, • ,- , . ; ',,,,,,:',,,,1.•., .'' , , • ■ .... . • ' ' 1111M . 0 " \ ,,,,.,:- °,r-,7:!:, . , '.=, Ti•..' ...4 ,' , t t. --; • , v ,* :*:,...,. '.,'',4.,:',:••;::::.;'. 1 .4 • 1 ..ii4A:,,r, , . . ,,..„ .... •,:'1, ,,,... . . ,,. .. ,„, '•:•.':,,,,,,---- - 10 - . . . . 1 . ,t- v. ••' •0 , ' • 14. •0-. ' . , , , 4 ,.. .,. , ..t. •%. -.- .- I R4 4 ., :0,4,, .,. , ,... •. ,.., .„..„_ . . „..,..,,, 1 ... . , • 0 ' i 0 , 0 , , .. , .., ,. / „...... ... ' r • . . . 1 . . .. , I . ... .., ..„,. , ..,„ ,,.......„. . , . *,... , . , 0 ., . • '- IP e ,... I , , . ....n.......„ ., . ..: . ,......,..„. px ° of „,,„ ,,,,, - 1,- ,,,,i-,,,*,,'„f':x v.,„,iiiit,•.,.„,. ., , ;;.itto. '.. iittli .4,,,,g 4, ,„ 4 ' ' s Y v” v iv§ i " tee" t A ■ z 4 r . e 4'' w it a, - 1f , �g s �..._� - stbr '+ 4. � x i117� h , e , kit,w � 4 L� ra a r . t It i ».� ..t. '''' i\ s 1. ,, 7.1sinifigesi_ „ilia 0 ,.., .-. i. 9- Y , ,! . m : i 1 s4 . M.. " • ': , , ., ' ..i...• . , :4. ,,', • I,. * ' "40,, _ . •'mom 4m ,"t 4f; 4_ 3 w° ...Ili i , ,...:4„. , ., ,.. 4. .. .. ;-r---- # , i ,.... , 1 t ■ ii. e li i «• 7 ate. ''..'` ,'' t A, •. r ..in., 4 0 !„1. kor ET ar, ,......„,„, „.., ., ON . . . :, : i , 1 .. .e i • ,4„'",40'. ###, s�� .1 i i I ii. � I 1 . ., : , , .* ,,. . , , �r 10 El , iii. 43 410 .. .. Ir.. : . . . „.. , . ,„ , -1: . , i - --', ,,,,t,,„: 4 , , ir ,* 0 ' fit„ Or- _ * I',.,,, 40 , ilii .. 4 . ; t lir 1 1 1Sil /4 I ' nil , . ., aims i i i t;11;4* I*/41111 t n P . 4 #* �,4;1;i .441111. i 16, , 1,...! .... if v ,,. I; ,.de .., .. tf.t..t. 10B 125.01 Powers and duties.— (1) The legislative and governing body of a county shall have the power to carry on county government. To the extent not inconsistent with general or special law, this power includes, but is not restricted to,the power to: (q) Establish, and subsequently merge or abolish those created hereunder, municipal service taxing or benefit units for any part or all of the unincorporated area of the county, within which may be provided fire protection; law enforcement; beach erosion control; recreation service and facilities; water; alternative water supplies,including,but not limited to,reclaimed water and water from aquifer storage and recovery and desalination systems; streets; sidewalks; street lighting; garbage and trash collection and disposal; waste and sewage collection and disposal; drainage; transportation; indigent health care services;mental health care services; and other essential facilities and municipal services from funds derived from service charges, special assessments,or taxes within such unit only. Subject to the consent by ordinance of the governing body of the affected municipality given either annually or for a term of years, the boundaries of a municipal service taxing or benefit unit may include all or part of the boundaries of a municipality. If ad valorem taxes are levied to provide essential facilities and municipal services within the unit,the millage levied on any parcel of property for municipal purposes by all municipal service taxing units and the municipality may not exceed 10 mills. This paragraph authorizes all counties to levy additional taxes, within the limits fixed for municipal purposes, within such municipal service taxing units under the authority of the second sentence of s. 9(b), Art.VII of the State Constitution. (w) Perform any other acts not inconsistent with law,which acts are in the common interest of the people of the county,and exercise all powers and privileges not specifically prohibited by law. 170.01 Authority for providing improvements and levying and collecting special assessments against property benefited.— (1) Any municipality of this state may,by its governing authority: (f) Provide for the construction or reconstruction of seawalls; 197.3631 Non-ad valorem assessments; general provisions.—Non-ad valorem assessments as defined in s. 197.3632 may be collected pursuant to the method provided for in ss. 197.3632 and 197.3635.Non-ad valorem assessments may also be collected pursuant to any alternative method which is authorized by law,but such alternative method shall not require the tax collector or property appraiser to perform those services as provided for in ss. 197.3632 and 197.3635.However, a property appraiser or tax collector may contract with a local government to supply information and services necessary for any such alternative method. Section 197.3632 is additional authority for local governments to impose and collect non-ad valorem assessments supplemental to the home rule powers pursuant to ss. 125.01 and 166.021 and chapter 170, or any other law. Any county operating under a charter adopted pursuant to s. 11,Art.VIII of the Constitution of 1885,as amended, as referred to in s. 6(e),Art. VIII of the Constitution of 1968,as amended,may use any method authorized by law for imposing and collecting non-ad valorem assessments. 1OBIQ-- From: McKennaJack Sent: Monday, May 06,2013 2:38 PM \(C_,- 0- To: Dick Van Deelen Cc: Mike Pierpaoli; Dennis Nelson; Robert Gerard Gerard; Bob White; Eric Loth; Bob Wilcox; DeGramThomas; LetourneauJeffrey Subject: RE:Seawall Having read the reports and had several conversations with Code Enforcement inspectors as well as the Building Official, I have no reason to believe there to be eminent danger of the wall collapsing. As far as I can tell, you have had at least 4 firms look at the wall, all providing somewhat different (but none inappropriate) information. As we have discussed, and is clear, the wall is in need of repair and sooner is better than later as the cost will most likely rise as deterioration ,continues. It seems to me that you are approaching this in a good and logical fashion. 1acJ Jack McKenna P.E. County Engineer Growth Management Division (239) 252-2911 Original Message From: Dick Van Deelen [mailto:vandeer020comcast.net] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 1:57 PM To: McKennaJack Cc: Mike Pierpaoli; Dennis Nelson; Robert Gerard Gerard; Dick Van Deelen; Bob White; Eric Loth; Bob Wilcox Subject: Seawall Mr McKenna, Persuant to our telephone conversation this afternoon, on behalf of the LaPeninsula Master Board I am asking for confirmation that neither Code Enforcement or any other county department has found any reason or evidence to believe that there is any imminent safety issue having to do with our seawall. You have been made aware that we are proceeding with Forge Engineering for mostly geotechnical testing and along with Turrell, Hall are now favoring a remedy for the wall largely using riprap. We are awaiting notice from the county that you are supportive of our direction. Thank you. Dick Van Deelen, President LaPeninsula Master Board 1013 TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARINE& ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3584 Exchange Avenue,Suite B •Naples,Florida 34104-3732•(239)643-0166•Fax(239)643-6632 December 22, 2011 Jim Kabcenell,Aircraft Investment LLC C/O George H. Hermanson, P.E. Senior Vice President/Principal Hole Montes,Inc. 950 Encore Way Naples,FL 34110 RE: SEAWALL ASSESSMENT,REPORT REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LA PENINSULA,ISLES OF CAPRI Dear Mr. Kabcenell, Turrell,Hall and Associates recently reviewed seawall assessments by Coastal Engineering Consultants,dated August 6,2010 and Turrell,Hall&Associates,Inc.by Mr. Rocky Scofield dated April 17,2009. After reviewing the previous assessments, our staff conducted a site visit to analyze the condition of the seawall and compare our results to previous recommendations. We concur with the previous seawall analysis and most of the recommendations in both reports, however we have identified alternative construction methods that can save money in areas and phase the work over time. Our recommendations have been overlaid on an exhibit outlining the approximate areas for each condominium building. Seawall Recommendations: • From station 0+00 to 0+50(Tract A)—Figure 1 o Remove existing rock along face of the seawall. o Add filter fabric in front of the seawall and along bottom,underneath where the rock armor will be set. o Replace the removed rock and add additional rock to entomb the seawall. This will support the entire wall with riprap. This creates habitat for aquatic life,reduces wave energy and is a value engineered approach to replacing an existing seawall. o We recommend installing riprap retaining piles within loft of the seawall if DEP will not permit the riprap to protrude to the proper distance to entomb the wall. o Previous recommendations suggest replacing this portion of seawall with steel sheet piling. 1 B Seawall Assessment,Recommendations and Budget Estimate3� La Peninsula December 2011 Page 2 of 9 79f 1 11 I: 1 ENTOMB SEAWALL : A t .. - ••SIT.' vie= ' w u•'^+ ✓ "_ j Figure 1:Entomb seawall from 0+00 to 0+50 • From station 0+50 to 5+23 (Twin Dolphins/Condominium Parcel 800&900)—Figure 2 o In areas where the depth of Capri Pass is to deep to obtain proper riprap slope we recommend installing new steel sheet panels or steel I-beams along the base of the existing boulders. o The panels or I-beams should be spaced to prohibit boulders migrating seaward. o Install filter fabric in front of the seawall face and along bottom. o Place rock armor along seawall to entomb the seawall. o By entombing the seawall with riprap it eliminates the need for a new seawall in this area. o The seawall in this area is adequate if future bottom scouring does not occur. The recommendations above are for a long term solution and an alternative to replacing the seawall. o Previous recommendations suggest replacing this portion of seawall with steel sheet piling. LES' , :g.:'. '..:'..RIpRAI?,RETAINING;I?I .: AND ?:.:':; :'.;r ;?':, s y.,_ l CL 74- yr " , ,04:n f �e per" .z R-,'--A Figure 2:Entomb seawall from 0+50 to 5+23 Seawall Assessment, Recommendations and Budget Estimates 0 8 La Peninsula December 2011 Page 3 of 9 • From station 5+23 to 8+00(Twin Dolphins and Adjacent Retention Pond)—Figure 3 o Remove the existing rock in sections (to not compromise wall integrity) and install filter fabric from the seawall cap and replace the rock. o Install new steel sheet panels or steel I-beams along the base of the existing boulders. o The panels or I-beams should be spaced to prohibit boulders migrating seaward. o Refurbish rock where a 2 to 1 slope is not present. o By entombing the seawall with riprap it eliminates the need for a new seawall in this area. o Previous recommendations suggest replacing this portion of seawall with steel sheet piling. ‘,./4 olgelf, r �= ______- Figure 3:Entomb seawall from 5+23 to 8+00 • From station 8+00 to 12+10(Condominium Parcel 600 &500)--Figure 4 o Install new steel sheet panels or steel I-beams along the base of the existing boulders. o The panels or I-beams should be spaced to prohibit boulders migrating seaward. o Add additional rock to elevate the revetment to the top of the seawall cap. o Repair the seawall cap, this can be accomplished by chipping away the concrete where bleeding is present and patching/sealing the areas with the proper epoxy. o Previous recommendations suggest replacing this portion of seawall with steel sheet piling. We recommend that a properly engineered seawall should be installed as a second line of defense landward of the existing wall(if repair budget allows). Note: Although the rock acquired from the construction of the new Lowes on US-41 and Collier Blvd was placed on top of the existing rock, the slope and majority of rock size is not adequate for direct waves from the Gulf of Mexico. Properly sized rock and slopes will stabilize the revetment and entombing the seawall eliminates the need to install a new wall. Seawall Assessment, Recommendations and Budget Estimates La Peninsul December 2011 O g Page 4 of ,i6 ....:::::::::::.:: :i.:':::'::::';.::;-:;::::::::::::::::::.....:.i...,::.:::::'-':.....:::::.. . ....:.:....s.;:::,....:.),...i.:::•. ' 010-1-etiS;:7,4411i115...Z!'''. .. . :.:...%A . .-.1:,:.:.:--::'':'j:.I''-:-.-.;:=..:.:'"i---*'Tzs:'I'-'':.±=::f::.-4.V-Ir4;f4,f4''?;-..I':1-..13:::.-:-0,-;':';::::; ---::;:'"\'' - --'' Figure 4: Install rip rap retaining piles and entomb seawall from 8+00 to 12+10 • From station 12+10 to 25+40--Figure 5 o Install steel sheet pile panels with a new cap landward of the existing concrete seawall. o Previous recommendations suggest replacing this portion of seawall with steel sheet piling. Note: The depth of the water in Big Marco River is too deep to allow the seawall to be entombed with rip rap and to allow docks. The existing concrete seawall panels are not long enough for the depths of the river, therefore a new seawall must be constructed behind the existing one. I 1 t F is Figure 5:Install new steel seawall from 12+10 to 25+40 I ij Seawall Assessment, Recommendations and Budget Estird es` La Peninsula December 2011 Page 5 of 9 • Upland walking path o We do not recommend using any concrete matting as suggested by previous reports. Regular maintenance with the small 3A"drainage rock should continue to maintain a stable walkway. Seawall and Riprap Construction Phasing: While completing all portions of the seawall stabilization at the same time will minimize the mobilization costs for the project,it may be more feasible to stretch the project out in phases. Our proposed phasing plan is shown below and is described on the following pages to help spread out the costs. PHASE-3. • RIPRAP RETAINING PILES;.; / .. AND ENTOMB SEAWALL ..::.gip. N Figure 6:Phasing plan Seawall Assessment,Recommendations and Budget Estimatel 0 B La Peninsula December 2011 Page 6 of 9 • Phase I(Condominium Parcels 500&600)—Install riprap retaining piles as suggested in the recommendations. The 27ft shown below is the protrusion distance our firm permitted, for La Peninsula, before Isles of Capri had been placed within the Aquatic Preserve. Figure 8 shows a depiction of our recommendations for Phase II. REFURBISHED RIPRAP r MLw .1-4 �l. itilf#0,4111tatepl- 40-1-0,.. 4040 et wegocat awls -sag ° lilwa�m0"� lip. FILTER FABRIC tee RETAINING PILE Figure 7:Phase II cross section • Phase II(Condominium Parcels 100,200, 300,400 &500)—Install new seawall behind the existing concrete seawall as suggested in the recommendations. Figure 9 shows a depiction of our recommendations for Phase III. OLD SEAWALL CAP IS REMOVED \ TO FORM AND POUR THE NEW CAP GRAVEL INSTALLED BETWEEN y NEWAND OLD WALL MLw \,+ ` Atka EXISTING f I RIPRAP JOI ' NEV1!STE SG.SEAWALL•': 4. %. . :.,:._ RIPRAP THAT HAS FALLEN • INTO CHANNEL Figure 8:Phase III cross section Seawall Assessment, Recommendations and Budget Estimle0 B La Peninsula December 2011 Page 7 of 9 • Phase III(Tract A,Twin Dolphins &Adjacent Retention Pond) -Entomb the seawall with new filter fabric and rock armor as suggested in the recommendations. The riprap retaining piles will only be used in deeper areas where future scouring is a concern. . If the DEP will not permit the riprap to protrude further than 10 ft. from the seawall than we suggest using the retaining piles along the entire northern shoreline. This will allow the entire seawall to be entombed eliminating the need to install a new wall. Figure 7 shows a depiction of our recommendations for Phase I. Yearly monitoring of the water depth in front of the seawall is recommended to track any future scouring, this will determine the timeframe of when the repair is required. REFURBISHED REFURBISHED RIPRAP de are RIPRAP `4 �® RIPRAP ®PA •) RETAINING q„by ®�^ .®� PILE al ea • FILTER FABRIC - 20. FILTER FABRIC Figure 9:Phase I cross section While the construction can be phased, all of the surveying,engineering and permitting should be completed at the same time. Being prepared with the proper drawings and documents will ensure a timely bid process for construction or in the event of a seawall failure. We recommend yearly seawall assessments to monitor the condition of the wail. Although the wall is currently stable, the structural integrity is difficult to estimate. If a sever storm event were to hit the southwestern coast of Florida, the aged seawall is susceptible to failure. In addition to the seawall and riprap work we recommend the following: • Rebuild the docks during Phase III construction to provide adequate access for constructing the seawall. Building the docks within their existing footprint will help reducing the time required for permitting. • Replace the upland rock stabilizing the berm of the 600 building. Larger rock is needed to absorb wave energy from waves that crest over the seawall. • Install an upland knee wall faced with rip rap to help protect the storm water retention pond between Twin Dolphins and the 600 building. We can provide consulting prices and construction estimates for this additional work if requested. • lOB Seawall Assessment,Recommendations and Budget Estimates La Peninsula December 2011 Page 8 of 9 Permitting,Engineering and Construction Budget Estimates: Please find below our recommendations to permit,engineer and create bid documents for the seawall stabilization/replacement. La Peninsula Budget Estimates Phase# Description THA Budget Est Updated bathymetry survey,will be used to establist Survey current rock quantities to calculate the amount of $7,500 riprap required for construction. Permitting Permit the new seawall, riprap retaining piles and $26,000 riprap with state,federal and local agencies. Conduct core borings (50ft deep)around project sit( Core Borings to be used for engineering the seawall and riprap $6,000 retaining piles. - Construction Drawing: Detailed drawings including structural engineering. $115,000 Bid Documents Bid documents so the project and be quickly bid to $11,000 area contractors in the event of a seawall failure. Solicit bids from area contractors and recommend Bid Process which contractor to secure for the construction $4,500 (based off of price and relevant experience). _ Construction Oversigh Daily site visits during construction to ensure the and Compliance every portion of the project is built to specifications $50,000 and permits. (Based on 25 weeks of construction) Total $220,000 Table 1:Permit and engineering budget recommendations The above prices are based on doing the project in one phase. If the project is phased over time the bid documents,bid process and oversight will cost more than what is estimated above. We recommend allocating the following amounts,shown below in Table 2,for construction. La Peninsula Budget Estimates Phase# Description THA Budget Est. 1 Rip rap retaining piles,epoxy and seal cap and entomb wall $287,665 2 Install new seawall $3,325,000 3 Rip rap retaining piles and entomb wall $437,310 _ Total $4,049,975 Total with 5%Contingency $4,252,474 Table 2: Construction budget recommendations These prices do not include moving or replacing any utilities or docks. Portions of the docks may need to be removed to provide adequate access for installing the new seawall along the Big Marco River. Seawall Assessment,Recommendations and Budget Estimat La Peninsu O B December 20 Page 9 of 9 Comparison between THA and Previous Reports and Recommendations: Our report outlines a value engineered approach to reinforcing the seawall rather than replace it as suggested by other firms. This will save La Peninsula money in the areas where entombing the existing wall is feasible. We reviewed the previous seawall replacement price estimates and feel the costs are not adequate. We have used pricing gathered from previous projects to establish a more realistic budget and have included a 5%contingency to allow for any future price fluctuation in the cost of steel. Below are two tables comparing our recommendations to previous recommendations(Table 3)and construction budgets(Table 4)from the recommendations. La Peninsula Seawall Recommendations Phase# THA Recommendation Previous Recommendation Phase 1 Rip rap retaining piles and entomb wall New seawall Phase 2 Install new steel seawall New seawall and concrete armor mat Phase 3 Rip rap retaining piles and entomb wall New seawall Upland Pathway Continue small gravel maintenance Armor mat pathway Table 3: Comparison between seawall recommendations La Peninsula Seawall BudSSet Comparisons Phase# THA Budget Est. Previous Budget Est. 1 $287,665 $615,000 2 $3,325,000 $2,839,000 3 $437,310 $990,000 Upland Path Continue Maint. $105,000 Total $4,049,975 $4,549,000 Total w/Cont._ $4,252,474 N/A Table 4: Comparison between budget estimates If you have any questions regarding this report please contact Todd Turrell,Joshua Maxwell, Butch Morgan or Rocky Scofield at our office. Regards, Joshua W. Maxwell,E.I.T. . OB COASTAL CEC1_t3rouu Services ENGINEERING civil Enginaertg Planning Services CONSULTANTS Survey&Mapping P. INC. Coastal Engineering A CECI GROUP COMPANY 'Environmental engfna Services Website:vmw coasta[engtneertng Dom August 6,2010 Via email:rcomeriato@rp-prop.com. Mr.Robert Comedato • GeneralManager RAP Property Management 265 Airport Road South Naples,Florida 34104 Re: La Peninsula Condominium Seawall Assessment CEC No.09.093 . Dear Robert: We are pleased to submit this letter roport from the inspection observations of the concrete seawall and Aprap protecting the condominiums association properly at the southerost point of Isle of Capri. The inspection was completed on Rem 24,2010. The purpose of this report is to assess the condition, to estimate the remaining service life, and to evaluate alternatives for maintenance. A total of 2,540 feet of seawall was included in tbis inspection omtbe north properly line at Must A to the east side along the Marco River. The seawall was visually inspected above and below water. Observations were conducted by an inspection team consisting of a prothssionaI engineer and a technician. Utilities were not tested or inspected;however,observations were reported on,apparent deficiencies during the inspection. A horizontal stationing system was established along the wall Co facilitate the location of observed Inspected conditions. This stationing originates at the north property line. Attachment A.includes a drawing depicting this stationing and two drawings depicting typical Dross sections. Speedo deficiencies on the seawall are tabulated in Attachment B. Photographs are included as Attaohnaent C to depict the reported conditions. General Inspection observations are described below. . BACKGROUND • • Reportedly constructed in 1969 by Garland and Garland,Inc., the seawall is an anchored concrete retaining wall consisting of 6-inch thick by 6-toot wide by 14-foot long,precast tongue and groove reinforced concrete panels with a cast-in-place concrete cep beam. The . ' 10B Mc RcbvrtCentedato August 6,2010 Pege2 ot:9 seawall anchoring Mel*of steel bars(tie rods)embedded in the cap beam that extend perpendicular torn the cap beam Iandward to burled concrete anchor blears(deadmen)at some distance behind the seawall. Spacing on the tie rods was not verified. The tie rods and *admen were not accessible fbr inspection. Al Garland,who built the original seawall, reportedthe river depths along the wall at the time of constraction were 3 to 4 feet. Several repairs to the Association's seawall have occurred since the property was developed in the mid 1980's,however details are not available on earlier dates. The most recent repair included replacement of a segment of wall between Station 0+20 and Station 5+23. This work was reportedly conducted.by Naples Dook and Marine around 2001 and consisted of rennovalkeplacement of the original seawall,including new tiebacks,and increasing the wall elevation by one foot. Other work observed included installation of ziprep along the base of the well between Station 4+27 to Station 25+40. Iiiprap installation has occurred several times at the same locations, as the Nooks have been displaced or have settled. Multiple modifications have been performed on the cap beam occurring at different periods. It appears the entire original cap beam has brae replaced. In an attempt to reduce overtopping, an overlay was conshuot dd'between Stations 5*25 and 25+40. The overlay thickness varies from 12 to IS Inches high. The cap beam overlay was constructed after 2001. • Between Station 7+00 and Station.25+40 a replacement cap and replacement tiebacks were constructed on the original panels. The date of this work is unknown. The replacement cap is 2 footfall and encapsulatesthe added tiebacks terminated with a nut and*4 inoh by 4 inoh by 2-fb of long steel angle plate. The plate was installed through**panel joints immediately beneath the original cap beam on the seaward side of the panels. The old cap was then removed and areplacement cap was formed to encepsulatethe tieback terminal hardware. I NSPEcIION OBSERVATIONS Concrete Seawal4.S?otlon 0+110 to Station S+25 At Station 0+00,near the north property line, approximately the first 20 feet of seawall eenslsts of the original seawall panels. The exposed portions of the panels were observed to be in poor condition exhibiting horizontal cracks with rust bleed out The top 18 inches of the panels has been repaired by extending the east-in-place cap beam. Extensive ornoldng was observed onthe top surface ofthe cap beam. The seawall panels between Stations 0120 and 5425 appeared in.good condition. Exposed concrete surfhces above and below water wore firm when sounded with an inspection hammer. No significant defects were fbund onihe panels. Panels were installed out of plumb starting at Station 3+00. As conahuctlonprogressed,the angle of installation became more severe. At Station 5+25 concrete was poured in the triangular shaped gap between the out of plumb panels and the existing panels. Photo 7 in Attachment C showatbis filled gap. • 7 10 Mr.ltobect Comariato August6,2010 Page3 of9 A.jet probe was used to locate and measure the bottom of the seawall panel. One probe was conducted at Station 0+550. Penetration of the panel below the olrannal bottom was determined to be 4.8 fret. A measurement fiom the lop of the cap beam to the channel bottom was observed to be 9.5 fret. The total length of the wall at this location was measured to be 14.3 fleet The water depth at Station 0+50 was measured at 5.5 fret The water depth at Station 3-x50 was measured as 6.8 fleet leaving only 3.5 /het of panel • penetration. Bvidence indieatingthe channel bottom has scored was observed. Concrete spilled from the casting of the cap beam,during original construction,adhered to the panel at Station 3+15. The concrete formed to the shape of the existing channel bottom at the time of construction. Observations made during this inspection f bunts the concrete adhered to the panel forming a shelf approximately 18 inches above the current channel bottom. This indicates the channel bottom has experienced significant scour since the lime o£construction. boints between panels have been sealed with grout from the underside of the cap beam to 2 feet below mean low water(IVILW). Below this elevation them are three locations where open joints were observed allowing sediment to wash out from behind the wall. Evidence indicates this section of wanes rotated seaward at the top,potentially indicating problems with the tiebacks. The cap beam is not stdaigbt Photos 5 and 6 in Attachment C depict bows and associated oraokiug of the cep. Cracks indicative of stressed concrete appear in the bowed areas. Cracks are not ofvnlformwidtb,indicatingdefleetton of the cap. Concrete Seawall Station 5+25 to Station 12+10 The radius at the southwest corner of the properly brim in this section.of the wall. The age of this section of wall is not known. The panels appear to be of a different vintage than the panels alonglireriver. A.12-inch thick overlay was constructed on top ofthe original cap beam. The overlay is not structural and is not believed to be tied into the original cap beam. The purpose of this overlay was to raise the seawall elevation to reduce overtopping from extreme high tides, storm surge and waves. Small stones and gravel have been placed'immediately behind the cap beam. Storm waves breaking on the seawall,overtop the cap overlay and wash out tine sod and landscaping. Reportedly,during the past winter,waves overtopped the wall and displaced the gravel and stones,pushing the gravel into the landscaping and steoidng it against the adjacent building. Water from the overtopping waves is allowed to flow from behind the wail back to the river through catch basins conneetedto sreali outfall pipes penetrating the seawall panels. Deficiencies In the overlay are xtotrolevant to the seawall condition. There were numerous open cracks and rust bleed outs observed,but these do not impactthc tlmetlon ofthe seawall. The defects are aesthetic end do not affacttha fiunotloaality ofthe overlay northe seawall. • 10B Mr.Robed Comadalo August 6,2010 Page 4 of9 • Strong cutients and atone waves have scoured the channel bottom In fleet of the seawall along this section of wall allowing the toe of the wallto kick seaward. The riprap placed In front ofthe wail compensates for the lost sand and the riprap may reduce scour at the base of the wall. A.large quantity of riprap has been placed in front of this section of wall with no evidence of underlying filter cloth. The aim of the rook placed in front of the wall in this area Is estimated to average 3 feet in diameter. The rock observed was not tightly placed or chinked. Many large rocks could be moved by hand and were displaced from-the wall lying on the channel bottom. Rooks were placed at an elevation even with the top ofthe cap beam between Stations 8+00 and 11+25. Along this section,rode;have settled an average of 2 kat and between Stations 8+80 and 10400 have settled vertically approximately 4 to 6 feet Wave action and outran washing around the rooks has contributed to the settling of the rooks Because ofthepresenct of riprap,no jetprobes were conducted to determine the embedment of the seawall panels into the channel bottom. Visual observations and measurements through the riprap Indicate the channel bottom was 9.5 to 10.5 feet below the original cap beam. As shown in the cross section of Station 12+00 included in Attachment A„the penetration of-the panels in this section of wall is less than 5 feet. Beginning at Stati0a6+00,the patude tlunyghout this section are kicked out at the toe. This would indicate the inadequate penetration of The panels. It was not apparent if the wall movement ocourrcdpriior to or after(or both)placement ofthe limestone ripraap. Tote seawall panels between Stations 5+25 and 12+10 appeared in fair to poor condition. Exposed concrete sut1boes above and below water were soft up to 1/2 inch deep when. sounded with=inspection hammer. The riprap In front of the wall hindered accessibility to . inspect the panels. Where panels were viable,eight panels exhibited open cracks. The widths ofthe cracks ranged Flom 1/32 Inch to 114 Inch. At Station 9+82 the 114 inch vertical crack in the center of the panel is aligned with a expansion Joint in The cap. The cap has shifted 112 inch and the panel is broken along the plane of the crack. A constraotlon joint in the cap beam at Station 7-3/6 has shifted horizontally 4 to S inches. The joint was placed directly above a joint between seawall panels. The panels have also shifted 4 to 5 inches,allowiogfill frombebhal the wall to Washtbrougbiihe gap. Seawall panel construction.changes at Station 12+10. The adjadent panels are net seated and { an open gap 2 Inches wide was observed. The panels to the east were oast with a different concrete mix and appear older. A section of steel sheet pile was driven in front of the gap to prevent fill from washing out from behind the wall. A storm.water outfaii pipe was missing an aluminum flap at Station 6+'/S. • 1OB { Waded Neale* Augusta,2010 Fags o 9 • anemia&awalI Simian 12+100 Station 35+40 The seawall panels between Stations 12+10 and 25444 appeared in poor condition. Exposed concrete surfaces above sad below water exhibited advance eallhte attack. The deterioration has meted the cement matrix and the coarse aggregate,eroding the audhce of the prneb an average of 12 inch deep. At some locations,the panels are deteriorated up to 1 inch deep. The deteriorationofiha panels extends frontthe rep beam down to 2 that below(MLW}. A j et probe was used to locate and measure the bottom ofihe seawall panel. One probe quoted at Station 20+10. Penetration of the panel below the °banal bottom was determined to be 4.8 (bet A measurement from the top of the cap beans overlay to the cbaonatbottom was observed to be 11.2 feet. 'Thetotal Iecgtb,of the wall et this location was measured to be 16.0 tact. The vista depth at Station 0450 was mowed to.be 65 feet. The water depth at Station 23+00 was measered to be 9.2 feet leaving loss than 3 ibet of panel penetration as a own in the cross sadden of Station 23-1.00 included in Attachment A. The drawing ofthe cross sectional Station 23+00 also depicts the serious scour condition of the river bottom. Water depths have seemed to near 30 that within.30 feet of the wall. The riprep pieced in trout of the wall provides some compensation for the lost sand and the rook may tedium scour at the base of the wall. No evidence of underlying filter cloth was .,\ observed under this large quantity of*rap placed in front of Ibis section of wall, The size Otte rook placed in front in this area is eetimaGod to average 3 het in diameter. The Moak observed was not tightly placed or chinked. Many large rooks could be moved by brand and whoa observed displaced from the wall lying on the channel bottosm. Nom moue rocks placed along the toe ofthe wall were observed at*,toe ofthe slope on the*tonal'bottom. Between Station 22440 and Station 23450, a vertical settlement of the entire seawall structure was observed. The settlement can be detected bye 0.7 feet dip retire cap beam tend overlay near the midpoint of the motion of wall.Seephoto 25 inAttac#maeut C. A large spell caused by the erosion of poor quality concrete in.the Underside Mho cap beam was observed. The span is 70 feet long intending temStawion21+98 to Station 22+68. The spell has exposed the reinforcing stool and the terminal ends oftbeilorods. Steel exposed by the spell is heavily corroded. Pacing the seawall,a thin shell of concrete along the lower edge of the cap beam masks the severity of the;pall from view. Photos 20 through 24 In AMtaohmsnt C show the typical conditions. Open jamts with gaps up to 2 inches and a horizontal shift between scawrail panels occurred at two imagoes, Station 32+10 and Station 20+93. Times horizontal shifts indicate movement oflhe wall resulting from faadaquste penetration isauca prior to re pleoement of the cap. Two other open Joint locations were fond with gaps of up to 2 inches. Shell and till was observed washing outfron behind the seawall ataU fear locations. Numerous panel jointa exhibited small spells increasing the size of the gaps and peamittiug oven more sediment to wash out from behind the wail. 108 ' • Mr Robert comedato August 6,2010 Page6of9 Open creeks up to Y itch wide running diagonally and horizontally were observed in 13 panels. Several crack locations were bleeding rust indicating corrosion of the reinforcing steel. These cracks were located from immediately below the cap beam to MI.W. Within ibis same section of wall,the toes of the panels were observed to bo Ideated seaward. FACI.I ITY ASSEgSNwT While the seawall panels Mills section of wall replaced in 2001(Ste 0+20 to Sta 5+23)are in good condition,the minimal penetration Is aslgnifioantissue. The defeleaaiesnoted in the cap beam indicate the wall has moved. Plating riprap in front of the wall may help stabilize it temporarily,but will notprovide apeanmanentsolution, Sealing the joints between the seawall poets prevents the equalization of the hydrostatic pressure item behind the wall. While the joints are not completely scaled to the channel bottom,over 75 percent of the exposed lengths of the joints are sealed. Restriction of joints to allow drainage from the backside of the wall may increase the lateral pressures and result in extended durations of saturatedsoil, cracking and bowing of the cap beam indicate the well has moved. Given the minimal penetration and noting the potential for the channel bottom to continue to scour,repair of this section ofwallmay not bepractical. • The concrete seawall protecting the property from Station 5+23 to 25+40 3s in Mir to poor condition and is=thing the end of its wend life Sections of the wall where the panel toes have kdo edwaterwardindicateinadequatepenetrationdepthofthepanels. urther scour of the deemed bottomwilt decrease the wall's stability. Sections of the wall Mating waterward at the top indicate failure ofthe tlebaelc system. The most serious condition observed during this inspection was located near the east property line. A 150--fbot section of wall centered at Station 23+00 has settled vertically as aresult ofthe severe scour condition of the adjacent river bottom. Only about 3 that of the seawall panel is believed to be penetrating the channel bottom at this location. While about 7 feet of riprap was pined alongthe Awe of the wall,it does not provide the same protection as the equivalent depth of sand. This condition is depicted ht the drawing in Attachment A. If the scour of the charnel bottom continues the risk ofthe seawall tbiiingishigh. The entire length of wall is currently ibnctionbrg as designed. However,the spelling and cracking in the cap beam,as well as the sulfate attack and mocking in the panels allows moisture mid salt to penetrate the concrete into the reinforcing steal. As the steel corrodes and expands,the concrete will continue to amok and spell. This wall has reached a point where the deterioration rate will continue to accelerate exponentially. Repairs to the wall at this stage of deterioration are not cost effective and will provide minimal e extension ofthe service litb. 108 ' ... • . . Robot t omhedeta • August 6,2010 Page 7 of 9 Major fedora in.the seawall repair cost are the design depth of the existing panels and the rook present that would(impede the installation of the new panels. Panels ics3talted at this property have inadequate length relative to the present depth of the channel. This is evident by the panels licked out watexward at the toe of the wall. Horizontal cracking indicates the piles are being stressed by the lateral forces floor the soils they are retaining. We recommend increasing the design parameters of the wall to exceed the existing wall, speci tally,the penetration depth and the capacity ofthe wall panels. 1EECOMMgNDATIONS Sewall replacement This structure was constructed 41 years ago, and is nearing the end of its design 11th. Complicating the situation is the:Bast that the channel bottom adjacent to the.wall has significant scoured. The large quantity of riprap placed in front of the wall has helped stabilize tho watt. However,the channel has continued to scow. It is recommended that the seawall be replaced within the next four years. The cost to replace the existing concrete wall will vary depending ante type of material used and the geoteohnioal conditions encountered. Based on our knowledge of the site,our experience with coneretepanels or steel sheetplling seawall alternatives and the associated costs, we have concluded the steel sheet piling alternative would serve as the most °Motive construction material f r this project. Comparlsons of the materials considered for this project analyzed condruotion costs, maintenance coats,material strength and service life. We recommend leaving the existing wall in place if feasible and installing the new wall Immediately landward. This may reduce the demolition and disposal costs and not impact the large q„anlity ofriprap. The visible portion of the mdsting wall would be removed above water after the installation of the steel sheetpiling. In developing a project budget we interviewed several marine oontraotors. The contractors provided budgets for the project on two different materials to be considered for the repair: concrete and steeL The budgets were developed from the following assumptions. The replacement wall would be 18 feet long with a cast4n-place concrete cap beam for the section of wall along the bay from Station 0+00 to Station 7+00. As the water depth Increases and the exposure to storm waves increases,between Stations 7+00 and 19+00,we . recommend the length of the wall increase to 22 fbct. At the east end of the property between Station 19+00 and Station 24+50 It is recommended to increase the seawall length to 35 stet The installation ofthe steel aheetpillng with cast.heplace concrete cap beam was estimated to mange from$t,too to Sar5 d?per linear foot. This range relates to the varying walipenetrationdepts. 1 10B ....., I Mr.Robert Cumulate August 6,2010 Po8e8of9 These costs do not take into account the presence of natural subsnr£ace rook. We recommend collecting additional geotecbnloal data to determine the depth of rook. We propose conducting a jet probe survey along The seawall alignment and conducting core borings along the river. Any boring iniormation available from the construction of the buildings would be helpful and could reduce the data collection costs. This information would enable us to evaluate the wall penetration depth requirements, Improve the construction alternative, pr and provide a preliminary opinion of probable construction cost. Further,this datawouid be necessary for design and bidding Asenroing borings do not encounter significant subsuritueo rock that would hinder the Installation to the designed penetration depth; we estimate the conceptual construction budget for repining the seawall to be$3,984,000.A breakdownby station is as follows: From Station To Station Distance f , Len 1 th ft : , Er • 0+00 7+00 70+ 18 1040,008 7+00 19+00 1200 22 I, t d ab 19+00 _ 25+40 640 35 j,3li4,000— These estimates do not include landscaping, utilities or dock renovations. Additional information as described above will be required to provide a more refined estinaate. -.N Scour Protection The seawall along the river is more susceptible to scow and wave action because of its pro7tlmity to the gal£ We recommend scour protection be added in front of the wall between Stations 12+00 and 25+40 to reduce or eliminate the possibility of the channel deepening and Increasing the exposed height of wall. Riprgp designed with Etter cloth is one possible solution. An alternative to installing riprap is articulating concrete armor mat. .Opr exp edema.with thin material has demonstrated it has excellent sorn:protection qualities and will also provide a hard aurtkoo for mine growth to attach. The product is easier to txanapoxt and quicker to install than riprap. The estimated budget to install 27,000 squats That of armor mat at thebase ofthewall,is$i}60,0/00 . Storm Protection Between FSYetion 6+00 and Station 11+00 The seawall protecting the property between Station 6+00 and Station 11+00 is susceptible to overtopping from storm.waves. This situation needs to be addressed. Water and wave forces have caused property damage and flooding To design a wall to withstand the wave forces and to be of adequate height to eliminate overtopping will be challenging and the construction costs will be prohibiting The currant approach to manage this problem has had limited success and requires maintenance after each atone ev+ant. We recommend exploring the possibility of constructing a.wave absorbing rock stmoture seaward of the wall in this high energy area of the property, , 10 ,E a 1 • ' • r • • Alt gobntCamodaty - 909 The adoob6srn is way ftabnaes io be betted wkbbu.aae of Bla id*tapes R 'F f o w e t t e l t h e plemthing poems for this W o e of*voters ht ate atm&pewe a IOW be ample& We reauttgeld 0 0031vep1 piton is()develop&deOtbig the petendsi tweets of this mots*and abmad atIk the ROW and Roo)cq Hey staff for tbefr krt. Faeeher peasaitoftdsooaroeptmgdepend otttbepegoseaof daregicaiex To address In i:raoatsppoteottnn needs adds tma,woo rcoommaod tits leatightlos of aaUaal ting copatels annoy reds beddaadtlawall melba ealdingpawl.*ataadeIdled peovect the lime e from n area bat w$1 ve u*d the resale lb tees teeHm a badti6 rasa mama newts�psmaeahieund A m Whew deentem cif potnetel. selitement eteuadetkdessoner.The intimated%utette tnebdt 8,.000squaea fret ofa mat Wad the wall is SWUM We awed fattens the ease between S u kam 6.100 amd 11400 whit.*161bot vddaoQeoaaf mats. We tgpyraaiste the� to be envies. rhea boss toy phase do tat laehatat °slimed ,2324}adeueloal28. linsesek • A • of tidy PA ` Attachments • r i , a isormi q,Now,timil ►Oe t asos34 NutW9)40.0i3'Sa tb afaeaaowmoniom stem . 1 1 • 10 El• ATTACHMENT A DRAWINGS • • ___ 0 1 -. . . • 1 1 . . ......__ ___ ... . ,, r,. /1.------ --. v , • , . , .` t..,..4,30 .4 . !I 1 .4 , , a N. 1 . t' ' . to 44 i 1 1 ig $' i \ ;g \ r L ...._-Z-wp.-- , . • f ' N e. \ 1 : Iliq � !rill g . ti I . . vliii. hp,i- 1. 7 • . ovii : - ..,_ .‘\ (..„,a,..--- II 0\0 L yr l ' K .. _i_ri tft m t r MMsimman ogig pp' • 10 B • EI.LVAYION (FT NM) • 0 o is 1114/ ,_1, i 2 cl;�r I fill/ ���� 10 B - , • . 11111146F "•- ELEVATION (FT NAYD) _ . Ilkti i L I � ;, 1 t J 11 ■ l 4. t FI „t •i• 1 » ..1 I a.I 1 ��lLl11L` '- 'ice �S�l♦�k ,�. -7t+,41'f ,,y'r+� >}"}i 1' 't/�,�yy;�7S ii,`T{� .- it t r.il.,,niir Or, �SCIl.F.,5` 2•.fJ"geJl}1!ll� -J1�' X,Z >.t: lH'N . 5'.1. , , F. 1 . 11.1.--119.. ` ' f ± 11-1 . lt,:t. ,,. 1 _i ,.... 1=11, I 11 1F•: raj -{ 0- rii i1 f 11- 4 � III. . P i , 1 : +►M ,---1 11!111" i`-1 . r 3 , . - i I • II I 1 . 10B • . , . . . I .. x. KLEunOK (Ft auVO) % ppit 1 d► kil 4. A n . w •I , if 11" . `,1 IL•=11: '- I • II= I=11' Immi a I1- 1 g 1 = II:I�y`�► �4 i I . Il:� • liz., is it a i \. P i : P I! r=1 i , P Its'iki i„._-• • �.IL 1 , I: 111 } '`. It' } 3111 g I { 31111 ► I i I V = ` • i 106 ATTAC MEN'S C PHOTOGRAPHS 111 tD 109 LA A SEA PENINSULA NASLULLPA OHCOOTNODGR AM M June 2010 • ,,,,--,,r7:4,:,7,-, 7,::-.-47„.,:.1-... . „ ,.19.-:k 4,:/4,'? ' ..V41;,_.r.1-11:?-,;11-::- .4.--/;;:' ., t -:. ', 34-!t4.11--..,kr,-,,,4 ,g•-:.;','-i.,,.,.k --•:- „:,.•,,4-::-. jA : .-.';‘," : '?' ' ''':', • : 7 `'%..4' ,-,•••• • `-..Y..r?,":: .• ,1 f ' --7'"'.-;':,••`''icrls'.--.. *-;-,-;•/ ;711:. '.•,-'----i-1-1'it4.4,..:=-." ' ' -4,.1-''-,:'•.:,-,7--..,..- ,.-. , . I.' ?,.:('`..t.,A tz'cr; ,:,,,,,4,..., ..., „, --,...,-.. .....;;;Isicl;;-1,, e .- ,-1...,c. ' • ' r;,-%,... -.*,,, ' -'-'.----`- r .:."54-e* 4It'- _, ,, ,.: -,..._- : 1.4(..----.".t..,;,-, .,;-.,;-1...,,,:--..• . *".m.M...v.-,, f'A'F...-:;s- . •- 0 - -.L ' ,,tx7:-.:,:f..:..A .ttv- - -),,,,5, -,--,..-- . ' -.-',,•-'' , ' '-' - -'-'1-.---.t-4 ..;,,,,,W-.„,g4o.,-,. •-,;:: , <1<:.:It_,(4..-- -4-ikvo-,-.,. ‘ . .-. ':::.--..-4.;f:'--•1.;:5t--.`4. v ..,z,.....) -, C:■-f ■ '' (4;:'0 ' 3'-',.':',:-''. ''.,--.4>•.‹* , -I..,..s.--•,,,,_ t C.:-..-04A•44, - • -' J.:'CIA...NI ,ili4 A.,...xvi,a; . . 6.:, v. • :3,....g zi:V;W:,:k "L:"st•PA0L: .:,-k,1 :114)11.: 1•'• ': 1..;•,:••:.1.1.14W,,,,/, ....,,f4v-,1 ' ••:('-'41eV>I1Noitv""'"":1 4.4-39 •■•':).-:":31,1: 7:14‘::..,1•-"i444;-':c ".t)ei • •'-;::::'W Yak-t4Ittesel ...., •;.-4;f:',4:.f.k•(- :i,k‘-,„,r.,,.,.....,*t..--az; , • , • . :• : qi)„,-..4A,-,g;ef,*, ••,, ,-' -1•1A,.'-,..O.,•,f,. .-t*p,,,-- ;,-.•:••,•:`-•4•-•:••:.4 • • •:.?'•.:'•;;:..1•-e; Zt:'4 Z•ic,tolSi..r.k‘-•kvtr.f4i1t.„!.l.w--,.;6-.1•t..;.314t4 4v4.i44;:Vz.-w1..,- , ,,, ,y .L„,,,,,,,,,,tiat....:\„,, • ; . ' ,. ;t•O.',.;11 -'44,1,1L1 .. • - .- 04;-4iNqm,z-s.,& - -,-- • tli;;,'... • 1 ;-,- A .- .,•.• , •i yoi•.c ta-,' Photo No. 1 -Station ;:. 0+00: Cracking of cap beam, - .: ..), .-,..:.:„-.-.' t . , . . N,,,t • , • ,.k.,. .,:...,-.A."s A ,•-•,-4,1-rt. c . -,. • • ... iiliff•'•;.'' V - , ' :,..-. '. ".. . . - , - t.,,,-"v II....e .... , ''''-'• - - .,••':....•.;2'•- :In.7• ''.. • . pi. •k ,.., , ''. ..'... ... •'••.7,;• . : .,:).■ ' 1 Z' i 1: '''• . ''1-' , %.13.'`' ,.4 ,■-:-' ,..4,,i ."--F..--% - ' ,:, .- -;;.„ .';, ti ' V ..- ..n..: .. - ,- _ \ ' ‘. s-R\4 , •II' 4t( '''''''!...' .1.. 4 ....A. • * •`',.1,0- ----..:. 1,.' ' ,',, '' '• 14,.. , s,1 ,...4-1 IrA.t --■:'. • '. '2'1 ';',-. -;.k' .--,-,--=',,?..-• VI .-'2'''''',7,(t. V . ..- .:•,., - '....A..z. -1'. 4-,,-. / _ ,- -/"' '''' ---'. '' titi-, ' ' ''' ' -. >i!'1.-•`-;=.:•.4.'"•, ' '':''' .1) -tc-1.1 ■ g.,.!■61#.!‘ ' ''-, ',,;I,,,'• ''''4 '',1 . , . 4'''. •i .k-1 ... !...S4V .; - . '''_. -;:'''':•,::;,.. j,',i 1 , r 1 -:.•.,11.1 •, . ...'sS:tt‘te",:. '`.3",1!‘I'd.:t Ai, • . , . ,...i...'i t..-,.±: , ---.■ , 7z.u.., _. . , ;,-:S 11 ,....' •'VI.''''''n..''' ' ,• _ , . .,...:::..,: ..,....,t„, ,,..„, . , .. .,..,,,..0:„. ...1.,.i t,,. • .. .... , .... . ,...,.,, t,......_., ,,,:y ,.. .'. A ;:lif ' • - o. -, -"'.•-• . - - -'• • ',r i .-- ,,,..' -, , y r,. , •-'. - •i .-;-' 4- . : ..,/,;•,i ., ,,,,i, ..- , - i,::• ,...,:- 6i-`1"-;;;Q:A „,.:„..,, -,. -7, .,....• Photo No. 2 - Station re a • repair exhibit cracks with crac s v‘i i beam. Panels below p extending cast-in-place cap Station 0+00: Broken seawall panel was. •epaired by rust bleed outs. Page 1 of 13 I 0 B 1 11,1t Peninsula Condominium June 2010 .,=.1. i'.Q 12 ---....,..`;' - if k 17-7-':-.". ,,,..51.,31;.4-:.'-'---s._,3t•t1%..,, , .,,,,_ --Li t 1.--,vi r, " "4, 1''.."::,.:;1".,-,:.A■!:,-,,,,i'•.".t•'•''ts.';1"'- ':-• I' 1 lt: " "' 1 1.-.". -;' '•/--,;•'"`;`--. -_ ••--.1. ,-• -4, ..- • -, . ' ■ e.rtirk,),--•••■,,', ,' •i,,,,t.; t t '• .• it'''.."'-.•-.?fie4,4 -4",-;,---744. 4;-4-_-% ..... .-:2,--7-•.....*:y4C...,k,. , vl__. 4,..i•` Vl•t..As • ;•:'......':.: 1-1•,01"sf•"?itY, Va.' V` -'''-•-g-,`.. ,,1i:AtiiikVrIaltjpi, . .,• "•.• " + , - • • • "",.,• ' 4t.,)!::”.....'.AP ilC$,-.-*` t-,11'44..{.-V.':N%•(7C ""-1.•'''',; • '. ts'c-- s fke 2 A. )AV, ',MN, -''' -,7,•,•,t.,1 :,,,•-, '--,• • ,), z, .. - -4. —vet f•::- '.?4 - -,' k**';*.V 41-.4- ‘,X.-;'',,.:• '' ; ,-1 -1,' '. ' '-f'‘',-:'i*.l'A, 1,.. 011'; Ni;-,(,As(*-vs-b*V&*.sq:`_-'-,■ ' ,diftj*.i --S-•,..w 6,1z.::4.1•• , **,.-4.z 1‘..t.gt - ..-il tiim, N.,•,',:' A, k--._ 1 .-.' ,.-,,,c,itoe•- ,•■••.i•-••,„..-t, Al A.•rt A" ... ' .,3t3.s2'+'.-,a2,Z;,''' • .,,..6F‘Tir,7.:.."1 -".,-..->„1,,i 'V....314'0?: AV=.94'6, 11%,,..-;----'', --1:-....,....,.,,t.,:- ..‘-:-.4.,.., -----.. . t• _.,,,...,,,,:i r .,.. 4, .,,irY- = . e.,,,7itiit. i;ef2f, - -.,.;.::= •. '.'0,.. :. '-.1‘.'';,t-:-•.L-V 's, 44 ...;-.rw,--„rv-.91...,,,A.,,,,....1, .34k:",,-.;-."4-, ::-'-...: 1/4. .-: .,t.,a.-v,:fs:-fr- i.5•':,i.:,-4,\I .i.- ' ."1 ,i,(.tP''''/,....zo,,, -1/ '!.;- ...-A,sy . • - ,i, ,;,,,.....,..‘•„:": ti..,,,,,,; 0.• ,, *II .4 ;.,"...,,,‘0,,,,A,-,,`,,•:14.1:. ,,:p...,• .,-.,ff.'..•- •' ..;;;•.. .;•.7,..t,, 'Kt> • x,:•••t•';I:4'i v,,,,N-, „, :Aj -,,,,',.y.}•tp:1...,0 .::'-'t: NA'‘.. ...;,.p . h'••.•'.. . • : ,1 ,,, '• 11...V. t 4.44,-... .-`•-'''T • ,•,. ' 4, ,' '•.•'' .. • t'!%.•‘'.-. 1".311-Pl".4,-- ., 'Ilk.i-1'., 1.st' -.4. '3.•,.., '1,`k '1--, k-.7ii, k .- . - -:c1-..,$ta.sieeitar......tei40. ttx42,14.,1,k'i;t1'4,4;I);C. ''.1-4'.:514'-',- -"•-..— ,.....•)'''Z,'' Photo No. 3-Station 0+10: Open cracks in cap beam. fragiVA,kras,A:.'fi,W11, 1.4".M.-1(7j.e.4* *'• .st,t:* .:,■ :'‘.-4e.e.--(4g.*."t' ii-'• ''', It.V47k10-40410 tas. .:.. :.■ ';'11''',11'k,.;**,:*,'i*;, -,Y,.‘11,:' 4 z1;.;:i.,- - - •,4t;t:-,:;-c:2.:,-,,i,_°r,,,,k: , cs---\ -citp.• ,;171:iipi,4''. ‘-•;•....7.4.}1..:A-t.:,-...',4_,..•„if„ 1. ..Z.s.-','-i&.-'-`---Vii"--, 54.';4•.:?4,7i-4.=g-4,',•, -,;-!:,•-i.\-s',i t,%"*.%, 4.1%,-itrclitc "9,1 ,f4- ' gi- ., `Vk-.1,'.. 1%.(c..- .-,.,-,?,;A .. -..,-:."A' ...,,r, .w..,e..,•,. C*1-ifg. E;$7:4".1*,1,•4-' "::,c(1.4-4•06 ' • 'CI,;* :* *4, ' IN'I`..2-■ ''ki. - '!- ‘''.- -sx. s 4:4,--.-ro Vtst-v',' C-A-tkip4z.1/4%'-- 4" s'•<-,• ."'''. ''''..-;," -0 "•!-At'l ....k ' — ' k. -.1,A • Aii. -,--,1.:1.-.. 03..?..,Q4.4,-,..,5,‘,1---,: _ , ,.., -..:,.,- ..,, te ". 4.44:.. A Fr 4'.• is -,,.. '5 4:k.v .et-4'3%zi.,.;WhiS•414.- ...:i1144..-9,,I;;;:;\ei-,, 14 : ' '4', ?k147-ht4* -'• ,„;4 1 ■,- i. .,•-,ol.V.,,..-1::'`4,,,f"''..gtf‹.-rgl-fg-1-..m.P;-,-.:11 qwf-t,4,4, -...w.1.4.,4&,. ,,, ,., -i. - 4-04.,-,= i. f- ..g-F,x'..54-'" l'ie-t.t.) ,... .,..,.‘, .41,„,,,I....... rp„.„.pt.t.:,..:w,,, t i. 1 =L . ,,,,...,..,‘4.1. r • 14,..v:9•Nz.•'-',.1 15/.(.....44;:,S. LA,'}•iiiP; •Ptitj.,,1 Alt4In'i.. t;"11.4. n li.4-!'(.,,' 'f, i 'rtkit K:Vgfp:4‘'?:/*, ‘-'4'nf.‘,•43Vst4 -•.*A'*M6C‘,7"CiN''f!,1'11',, 1‘..‘'.,V"r':19' 4 ''''A Ts . 1,'"`.. Als.lfliiii. ..•.•.:. k.:''''•;:eV. s T,Ii'*•WPZI-''\-',1‘. I\411'11''.r.',-'• ..:,,,,kAii: , Avz.,.•;,,,,/,.4.4ta,,,.-.. •,,4 I.: ,'i,Acca:,*,..‘■",s,, y‘l. $,.-;_V*) +.,`.,,,,i-,,*-k.k i ,•,., ,.• - .01;.• -..,, ;kw ,-k ..c il,..-fo,„•Esz.:-11.N! t........-'•;.'''--,`t''''i3-'t'`•?..-1: /,'=•:.s'•-`,..l-V-;1•:.1V.,,,-',.%- .` ''',■,..: 't , '‘'‘,`,..li'‘• ,A-g.'.• .1', ,..., -,,,--- . -.• V.: -, ,z..: `"4•4, :) ,;„,,,,i,' ..4l-.• 2,;•,,,., s ;,e•;, ‘;v1 , •>, ,,v. fri' ", -t, . . : 0.,-.;„,;,.,;,.-..,1.:,.:,,s:-\ -;:i.4-1.,,,-.41. ,•'.-"."A,Z10::.;,-,,,q...,..."-,. :. ;,i li..,,4''' 44.■,:,:Iv's,' :,-22!•--...../-:,\ ..-.,1,......-, si'-‘,,,.... ..,,.•, ,-7-.„.''1.!,.',' -.-.-,..; ''s.-\.;,::'!, zAkt,.1/4,e r..,..T..,. .--,; ".'..;.. 1- •-2.i, ,-,:;-...••1' :;,4,3 Y-, :`,•'-'.-,*:,-''''';',','.z., ''',T \'--,::i !I:j'Y 'i• ..s.)':,,:;.'"kc"'"'V•11 tr.'''.:0-_.'s:•le*.1, ; " - :, ,t • ..-.b., ` 1 ' ".<,-V... ',.- • %.,•‘,..V.- t.' ''',4:,"Oii.1'1'•\,1'1:fc','.%`,,,..1.•'Ifs .- -',,''-•- -..,.." ,.. 's,"Z'. ' -:-- .: •'.-L',',. - .'I 4 k)tCli'0' x:•;Va-iCt•‘•-• •V ii\-.'''-''' ':',„1.'''. '''. .4'•■,■-`..s.:*'.t....■'1,`...'':?i'-',,,,''1, '. .i'-',. : .;•-\\,i'''..Vjl'iii.,\,0...).,s‘iZ.4.,/,,;...-,3 , ' '1.4 '' ... , 7N".. '-'..)7; - '''- -..''f'- ■I, ;-Iv`',1'i:1*-:..)\'' ,-'' ''''',;:l.:".1,3'Y',,i-f''-'';'.1?'";?..,:1-': . - . • ': s.;,::-•'''.. A ;.'"'',' ''A:'...-.-,t`1'..-•.;'-i .--:t'.s‘' - .,'\A!_A; '.-:>",,S-*..,..)-il. . .. . . ■' c,..4f4;11' A •I`',-:is t ,,!. i.'lf.".:.k.t-k tt? ` '•'.. .. .. ,;,. „,.''\4••`.. ^ ''s• ..'..,‘•',A t. i),•s;_tP l'' •-\• '• 'Ws1;•`(----:.:e-: ‘,:f.:1'-`‘:ks..".1,t *•*, . • '' ',,i-,,''.11%-', ..Z,<!1*.••...'1,0;-,....'„i ' ' I.-c7--1. ,ici,:14•:‘,4,ff...,*,...:;.**,...** ,k7 A ' *. '';': ,■ **'4`'' 'il':1;',:'r1,64f;---,f-'1*,*%' ■-;* : - *."-,*'--.:,.9.{,.'":.5,*:7'. -;*: s' ' '';i]- ',:V.Z, ■ •-%,f , tk.,,,c,;;?,..4.-?, :;`'41yi ;, ,t.,$-... ,,,,.?3,4...........--,-.:-: . , - ,-. 4. '• :.cpc?„,., ., 1=,-:,s..---;&i..": ' i.=:::'A?"-1"04-.,-4-4.A'-':-•-,.:.',-,t,...'-,-,,- • ‘,. -..,. . ... Photo No.4-Station 3+76 Open joint,misaligned panel, toe of far panel kicked out 5.5 inches at mud line. Tongue and groove not seated;sedimen behind panel washing out of joint. Page 2 of 13 10B La Peninsula Condominium June 2010 •i ,, ,![-- ;_'-iT, s Hlic � =. +V? ,... o1..--;::-.; .:. y-..:'•'� ..•F Y �•y rl >'i: f .•'.•t3 Jj.4 ::!.1511,'-1∎!J•a •i• r'Y•�;,:.p.,....F k :ft:j hI h cii ' �, �'-�•: jib :.:•.. • i�te.g t� �,:S€�a mss!' yet`',ice. .kr• "! ' ' • 2 1:ikAv.:i4.4'..:•1,7.%,,)kftr:::::::1"••Vg.',A,trri.i.1:4-.1•:.;: 417 1r, C. � ,• •t::,, • }� _;:;,•,...-...1..c •',1,:s 4t...-: -1.4',7:g-1!!I -...41...r...,..;:. se ;•:, Photo No.5-Station 4+50:Photo looking east shows bows it cap beam indicating movement of wall. • Y �. ` .� ta . , t1 • .. +y Ill ii 1. 1,k. a ./ .' ' _ * i } '-+ le " C4 AW'f f !ft.4''*: t._i1.1'�4 T. "i.',1,. ;^`i.+`:a�'1-�•t x: . ;? 1 '::•-., . '1"1:'Z:g;24 lies.'✓,yYiN - 4.,1'i'J'o� ,}":(,tii):411: :'....0::Y: : .. n 1 ;S:•y •w�s�fVi', 4. 41 ii •' i., - zT:''•.•� s a _f S'. •K:•I ' -:r ♦t {: -,..y '. ;, " . :.):?•::::.•••..i: i....!.1'..'..:' ''....,...-. ....,.•'...1'-:•••:-.:.r� 1r• Y.• i t• is `.: f:f> • t: ,, ylic C.::''''(/.(1''-''''';'.:;';''''-'::• t ' t 1F t ./. ti\ rt t k•. / �} '2):::,`,, L )/�,1/ {it)) ,t 3 ;i'•::::‘,.,.'�1 •,(te ),af`♦ ,` 3t Q,_1'.,•''•'r ♦ <�t3. 1.(S'u .� i " . � lF� �i y S� SF: i ! •/: )-5. ,1 r ( r: / � L l �, , i y1::✓ .1. /t 1. �.. )r .,.1-?t ••/ 1a,u1�l-.111t•L•i ..tai a i� : .-?! ,4 3: Photo No. 6 -Station 3+60 to 4+50: Typical photo of numero is cracks in top of cap beam. Cracks open on outboard edge and closed on landward ide are indicative of movement in cap beam. Page 3 of 13 � I 3 , , 10B L<a Peninsula Condominium June 2010 11111111111111 I llllIIlft}llli x u• =;fig q l% II1l�I111I1 I it lit Mill fit' 1;`1t� ! s:: lintsi�i milli �..), ' '`' \ N 1 111�I�It'111S1 rt . :-..7.--,,,- + ti � u :' *c sST 3.!�• . L aTn st : "L � Q 1 i 4.g.4.,cril -i , r % V(/`' , xj p•iV V,' ! • :_ - w 4 1 c ; {S y Y'� r, , '+t i, ,..- . -t +s t+s y x„ �. err c fi. r t q, . ', . <.� • i--• f '-. r i.1 :j::=,_. • -.: 4 e,. ei o r . kFL •. .. :. '.`. :.-:!..-.F.:• <fi!:Atiifi:.;`;:b:`:: ::.,.::..,- :; : 1 • • • °r= Photo No.7-Station 5+25: Construction change,cap beam!overlay begins. I, . a _ • t3 • r ti : _; � 4 Y •' 7, s. s .ses 1i.�•-r. Z k L>+'m' v t ili,I.s-'r� n .Fi S + ; fi< ) +� {�••; '_:+: '-..t y � i7 :7 % {`: S% • Y_ii,r:i:'n.;.a h ]5 ' � jY'4` 'i C y; q 5=-{1' ti � ;i.�;A.. •',c.:..<:.�. r'': .a.`�'•1., ..4 {s rr ._rc...;: w . �:, " :: ;3._c h= :i. 1< , 4�f.��.„ . < 43:,..±::;,,,. ...1 �,N F �tr � _ • _ .l: '.: t1i z s r,r .r r y�t . .s f 7....-•rr '�aY QQirt i; !i u �t,\ 1 '' r”- d- 1.. Y ,-.,10t --z 3I t,.# s`' .?ra 4 i`_- •s.. ,- .c,-.?"..-- ,...t,...: tr; + f1. $; S ,Ya -sayz Sj t 5•,.,[7Ji' � rS j''',..:17:'3 44, x. • t "y*1 Sic ,q1 �y_. ... K,s t. 'vv F�"t �`�,, 'e> t � �' t 4' ,.t.-,„"..'s e a lad k try is y j A� i ' i i ay y'i Y s tr,�1 .:. `' i� ., ._„-S!Ya ? �.e.�,1` -,i'-. <, , ss f!r-.-t. v• Photo No.8-Station 7+50: m Severe cracking of cap bean oNierlay with rust bleed out. i I Page 4 of 13 • La Peninsula Condominium 1 0 B June 2010 ---,,-; :-.--_,,..1.-4.ilf..-•:,:',' --...":-. . '''....,,,,'....ii(f.fif ,",:.;',;."'?3.,4?'',"."--(.'<...,;-..,"...-';"....-: ,„..:4 / .,i-.,..y,-. -.;•7..ir••:'-x'...4.4'.„4-1,K,'..?•:4„,-,,.;',0,.....-;:yo,yd:iii. - - : ,' ,„;,..;',•,:.:4,' ,:'q;6:-,.,..;,-„,,,„-;:,..;,;, .;‘,4...,.. ,.,-ei . .. --_=-,..,,,,,,..•_,,-,-7 ,,,,-,J. --,,,• ..-• 14-(' '''' • ,.. . . ;'.:.,, . ,,.., .'. ,.',.f iS.'1-- .. • • ' '' '': ••.,-; . - ' • '.,';'`Ir '''.k%.1 k41--r.7---i•. „•' ,%, . , 4' 1 .•,..;t- e • ' '' '-:•.-.z.::,:.".: ,.t:3N.,1.,_.•.. . ' r" . I.: -;-•-• ..,,,,,;:i• •-•,:•••,".,-.....,:,-1,.....•;,,..,../..1"-- • •".• '. , : if . ..'' $- .-., .,:,..............s.7.V44.•:-...t„.. ;--:1'...,'\• ' :: ...;:..:.....i. .:.:'-';.,...;i:....:- =' -, ,q, .'•'i•• •••••• •••• •'4,' '-;-•,,,- ;`• , , . 4 ..,. ;:-.•:t. .. :i. ..,'" •••;;,":1:::=;;;•.:=. .,. ,,:.•"‘.-4' ',,,...,1..:)i.7.:•,....4.•..V . ,....1,,., .. . , , • • •„2-i.:;.! ::,.."! ...• - •.:4..... ."••:,..:.:,-..J;\,. "..;.4...;:... „I'ef,;.-.,'A.:"...frr-,:te':'...:"'...` • '•' i • .- ,••. •-...i:e ..• •...-• -.,. -. ,/,'.:.',... .: . ... '. .;-.,...:...: . ••• . •.-s. I-'-.•r',..: ii •• '• .: '... ..•-.1 V .,....'.;-• •".•''• : .:'.•••.„,:.1 '..;...:••. ::-.•......• . - •• — .'—i..-.•-••7":V••:1-:-! !S• •-.. . : ••••-•,.r.,A/•••••,•••••••••.":4.....`--ce••••••-•.,,., '-i.-:•;",.- , .11;1- :-. -,. ;;i1Vg,-;;,- ,' '-'• •. ' •-•-: .•. • . . • ..•' '• •.-i....'7"...t.:.'".!•.--,::s":.>"•"•,!-' f'r.: ;•.) ••:••.,. : ,:.. 'A ".- .,;:••••• ..-•••••..:-...'•••• • • 1.. • • 0■. , ,•., • • •••':•••••••••'•••• •••••:•••,::..•.:-.. .•••••:-.. . ••::p..':; "'. ;• • • • r•-• ;.ittolii• , • '?iv' S . . . • • j."-.1•1,,.4sV,.-- '.■'+'..:.T.''-•,,t• . ; .,r 1 ,-l. -;.-NI. `,. 1.(,,AP!., • • t v, i,. `i, .,,, --"1_, ..,c,I. ...1;•„1,- ,... -, ,s t ,•''t ,• ,s1'1.-, ‘,*.r• •-•,. .-'' ••;-j ft"r• 4. . '..,:- : i.,.1, .;',4t,r. ,e1 ii(,,n.:, :I.t i.,,,;.,:e ...,. .._ ,._, ,..-I. , ..- .,. .,,,1 1:::-...; .-.4 .4-?;,."4 A '' .71,- :.::.,,t-ri,4 ,..4', A),•. 1 : ! rilprt r'i,',:,-- : ti ‘.r,... '' k.`•,,. .'.4 ..?.- i--. ' :, •'r ;, :,...- 'i •.,,,,:;;;;,.‘.....; , .,,..,.1 :. ;r-,.... 1 ■ :41;4...ri-1........ - 1.:....., ,-;i'1-% ,.. '.-74: ..i:',"1' -•),,--4:,•1;‘,i, ,":. ,,-1:;t,x,.--41 1:1 ,,i1 I -I II.• .1. f '''.'Si tfl.i .': 14 .,•2,•,ii •••••• '„ 1,-..- '`,'-;r1.:.'- • '-.:0,I);-:!,f' 41,"... .,'• a ...., • i 143,44:IA';4 't•''ri'l'',j),'...,'44:.; ,...• . ,i?.-,.• . ''j',,,.i,.-:&k i,:,- . ..4...,:: I.:. ..'. ...? '*-. ',-. ■ :.; .„„... „ • Photo No. 9 -Station 7+55: Severe cracking of cap beam overlay with rust bleed out. • .... :• ,.• . • •• •:.1.,;; .,.;.-liVir...R: '••••!.;-.....;:.'....1.-:•:''....:'::f•:::': ........,:Y...••••.i,.. '. . ...''..::;-;•.-:- f..:•.' ,:-.‘,-1 . •••• ' ... ' • ---..`-''"' --.' ' • • . -• - • - -- .- :‘"t- , , -v; - .-..... • „ --.. ....,..-_,;.;.-.-.:•...,,,•.."..:-:::.•:.-::!:',••:::::-..,."•,-;:..; V, •------,-,' '''-'''' '--">"- : -:,.‘,. ,,i. , • ..: ....:;-.,.:.-;:•;•,•-•,:....-..:-..i.,..:!....•',•....... 'f ,....,.! 't ....L.Z, '.7 W.': ' ''....‘,. ' .% ICil....:,.Z..-''-'..'. ..:......:::: .::•... ' ......i..;;'i'?..;,.;!,_.",,..:. ,, ..' . •....Z. ..- s' ...".•, 4, .1;ii..',;'i-;•:!...:,.C;;.,';;:.......'.''...; '.,''...':''. , . : ,5 tli ...."-'7-'•..sz,'s'aTh?... 1..2....... . .-ilit: ". la,';4' i;;;.':: ............:.:.'.'......,i'L.J.::•.:'......;::....?.• ":'-2..'.. . ...-:-;..i;r:''.:S.:- :?:,• :..1%, . .1...:• :-..... .••••••:-...•••••••,..-.......:.•:•:,..i 7. c •k ..-':.- --, •- ;,,-,... '1 ..,..4-Y:..:;''. '\-...'-..... '. .. •;:"....."::';':':'........,...!....;.-[ist.S.....,::z.. -'''''' '';.'•,>,..1--.--.-,--....- . .;--..i 11 .... 6,— . • i ,..-4.: ., ' • ;:..-.. :,.......,...•-•:....:: .':::•• • ..'`-..-- -',',.'-.:,'`.• „-.'-','::?..1'.-'-r.--;' .' i tE•:.,,ek'•,,•$. -'.• . - pi!.. . ..,. ,- N--:,•,.:•;,...;•.-7.,I.': .A.:14*...,'',..,,....",;. ,,.`....,%;,;-.:!...'4.}.■;".''','1';'...--...,..';',-,1.''..-T; Vir'1.' t....... . .'... ' . .., ..'''. ..:-.5',..7.-1,4-.Q..al.47`■'-'4`-'-ti'-',,,..r e't.iI-.' ' '''''‘'.-"Is .-;C:. • :...• ti•!,.• •A 1•A.• '., ' r.!'.'".1.",k,s2' ::-.,...*': •!-ii:,,,..4%;',.A' ,•‘:-' '.''' -----1 '' .-N- *.K. I s, • it i•••••.:••••••‘.,•••••-ii-r' " . •:::•.•••!,:s!''''Y'•...:::.•.''.1;•••• •.•:,'••: , •'i,-• •.--'. '. ---?. ' '' ',..,, - 1" •••'... -... ty.i.:4. t::• '''. - .'•::•,1::-..:•••7:•:•V;•;•:..'-',.••....•;..,..•••••.;-.74--;.-V,'.1' i..,Mi,', '; 1 4t..k..': ....-.-..'.••• - ■.. .'......: ,...- , ::.v.. .,..-..1‘...*-...- :..• !''. li''''''• ..;,,..,./•:.... ..4.-... v, .-;.;•,...,.•',I.:, 440c2)001, Ni..• -.•n.....c.:ATi .-• ..z...........:••••.,...\.....-.........i.,•• •i.6-:......:..,..,;;. ,, .:..,...,,. :-.,•-•.. - ..,; . ,.. ., , •,.; "...",-ilii.'.: 3.....! ,,...,;:•:-....-:-.';': .•:if•ig--....: 7.!`1,:.!.1.; ..'-',".i.--..--'-'',:- . ' , ••:-.*-:-.' •• ,, • . ., -.. j-,.. ...!,. ...::..;:.*:::*.•-;:••6V:'•!;'::.,..,,,, :••••;`..t.',:=.. ...- ,.,. - • .".. -• :, ' ' ,,.. - •.". ...= I i.J,:i :..:- '.-1.0..Npt.k.,..:.•...".1. )i.rt., ...•.. '',.. •■• . :,'•,••• . ;. ......., ti:...-..,„....i..,..:::!'!;, I',. ,-:i. • •• '‘'. -,,' .: 4,-.,1 ;:.•,.. • .4,..,. • .. L..;,•' ....— • • -.. i.. ' •-,.'.. -.'' ' .',.''. . . ...:... . , "' • . . . . . •:, , . .• -. -, . .r, -.%. Is.... •, ,:.-.:•:-.:•,:...,..t iiii.-;,- ,•-=•.:-.:..4.?±:?:,,...... . •.., , , ,... • •.• , • r•-•• .•••• n;••, .• •••• , r , '..• •"••‘. (1.4'-...4 ••'•.'.':.• '.--:: ....(.... • - ,, - . Photo No. 10-Station 7+76: Cap beam overlay shifted 1.5 itichcs. 1 Page 5 of 13 f I II lOB 1.a Peninsula Condominium Juno 2010 • "^ i 4• yt P 1 Gi � - �,t��3Z .• - 1. �{3. .• ti L , X -1 t �x�ti.l E = e:'" ert 1rl∎t r1 3 a -- e� 3 r s,r .i, 6 +rC 4 )r t �V s;,i "?.'7,1-',;'1,'. 'i �. 4 ' h t s t F '. (rb,•�.ttr• i iy';r�.i $• i , �; 3i', `i tZe.,ii ��r +i' ct , '* k'� , �� lam' '' !s' �i t � {.... Photo No.11-Station 7+7'6: Original cap beam shifted flinches;panel tongue and groove broken and shifted fl to 5 inches. • • 17774-.1,..1'Y IY.'2 "� IliVfI.7k.t' ,,�`.liYy'y•`3 3e,�;y,.rd rC j r$j` i '+ i�"i} i�� X• _* Y'F€,�±Y ` 3 .-y itiq t7 A� S`"�"Zk ash # cj`"v' T.'�fcs"stl �r0` 2}p� z i 1' �S rr``� eSt�S Eva 4e i , ` r +�,.- .i L. 1. I • • r 3-z'x ,rr ift t{7� r - r ' {�. -'));;;a4-f....;,.,' ' '-1,:- .4:`,., t5,.} 1-1,...� ' .,-,, 1 ,� • } _ `1 }<"i�fed - r .` '1 t ' 3 t�E ,,I„• ! +1 ,�� -ft ,*.11'.: z '`•£ i !F: ' L art a ,3E .+F ,f_e ♦t, �7t !,fir C•�. srr 4j • e: f, �' i , cYr1,i' ' 'i a'..qty e •c r ? ii j+te r' fs"q Ee ter.4, 1 ; '.1 r£ f, I s, g ;O..? J `' ( It,,ti .; � t e � � s� v ,. rd t -' J�. , 1r F s ` x- s 1' { wate:•, `4 2=' ,4'to-4,•,......_ •5.•5 i�*r�.•24,0.��.•i l �f2 'Y4 'ii Photo Noe 12--Station 9+82: Seawall panel broken, open vertical crack % inch wide aligned with expansion joint. i i i Page 6 of 13 li i a Ei ORDINANCE NO. 85- 2 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION, RECON- STRUCT.ON, REPAIR, ALTERATION, PROJECTION AND J .° PROLONGATION OF SEAWALLS AND REVETMENTS IN THE UN�IOORPORATED AREAS OF COLLIER COUNTY; PROVIDING p` 1 DE1INYTIONS; PROVIDING THAT A FAILED SEAWALL OR REyttMENT IS UNLAWFUL AND A PUBLIC NUISANCE; • ��•1 • PROVIDING FOR ENFORCEMENT JURISDICTION BY AMEND- " 'F - el ---. ING SECTION THREE, SUBSECTION 2 OF ORDINANCE NO. i4 83-43;,:TO PROVIDE THAT THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD Or-COLLIER COUNTY SHALL HAVE JURISDICTION TO HEAR AND DECIDE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE; • ; PROVIDING FOR OTHER ENFORCEMENT REMEDIES AND PENAL- • TIES; PROVIDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEA- • WALLS AND REVETMENTS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • • • WHEREAS, there are many areas in the County which are adjacent to natural or man-made bodies of water; and • 4 WHEREAS, many of these areas adjacent to bodies of water are bordered by seawalls and revetments; and r-----"WHEREAS, properly designed and constructed seawalls and revetments servo to protect waterfront upland property and improvements located thereon against wave attack and servo to stabilize the position of the shoreline; and : -_ __ __ • L" WHEREAS, seawalls and revetments have a tendency to fail and • fall into bodies of water because of the passage of ti;no, strong ; winds, heavy rains, erosion, corrosion, and high and low tides I among other reasons; and - • rl WHEREAS, seawalls and revetments which have failed or collapsed aro a hazard to navigation in navigable bodies of water . and a hazard to drainage and flood control in non-navigable bodies of water; and WHEREAS, a failed seawall or revetment with accompanying r. • loss of fill, unless promptly replaced or repaired, may cause continuing loss of soil on adjoining properties which can seriously and adversely affect the stability of seawalls and revetments on those adjoining properties as well as the value of adjoining properties; and . WHEREAS, a failed seawall or revetment deprives adjoining property owners of the additional strength that derives from the • • n 100K 019 NCI 263 B . . •.� common benefit of a continguous seawall or revetment; and WHEREAS, individual property ownors are presently respon- Bible for maintenance, repair, and replacement of seawalls and revetments along their property; and • • WHEREAS, there presently exists a threat to public health, safety, and welfare because of the failure of some individual property owners to maintain, repair, or replace their failed seawalls or revetments; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY • COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: Section One: Definitions: As used in this Ordinance, the following words shall have the following meanings: "County": means the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida. • "Seawall": means any solid upright structure which -- —.-- serves tn separate real property and/or any improvements thereon from any natural or man-made body ""• of water. • • "Failed seawall or revetment": means a seawall or • • revetment that has failed structurally or that has • • moved from its original position or that does not • serve to stabilize the position of the shoreline. "Revetment": means a sloping structure which serves to separate real property and/or any improvements thereon from any natural or man-made body of water. a Section Two: Failed Seawall Or Revetment Declared To Be Unlawful And A Public Nuisance. • It is hereby declared unlawful and a public nuisance for any property owner in the County to permit, cr to fail to repair or reconstruct, any failed seawall or revetment upon his property. Section Three: Enforcement Jurisdiction. In any area of the County where a Code Enforcement Board exists, such Code Enforcement Board shall have jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance, however the jurisdic- tion of the Code Enforcement Board shall not be exclusive. The Code Enforcement Board shall have such enforcement powers to be 2 MAK 019 rt,. NMI 1 0 B.i • exercised in such manner as may be provided by county ordinance or state statute, including the authority to levy a fine not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) for each day a viola- tion continues past the date set by the Code Enforcement Board's order for compliance. In connection therewith, Section Three, Subsection 2 of Ordinance 83-43 which created the Code Enforce- ment Board of Collier County, is hereby amended by adding the following language: (j) Seawalls and Revetments - Collier County Ordinance No. 85- 2 and amendments thereto. Section Four: Other Enforcement Remedies And Penalties. • Violation of the provisions of this Ordinance, or failure to comply with any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall consti- tute a misdemeanor. Any person who violates this Ordinance or ---- fails to comply with any of the provisions cf this Ordinance shall upon conviction thereof be fined or imprisoned, or both, as provided by law, and in addition shall pay all costs and expenses involved in the case. Each day such violation continues shall be considered a separate offense. In addition, the hoard of County Commissioners may take any other lawful action in any court of competent jurisdiction as is necessary to prevent or remedy any failure or refusal to • comply with any of the provisions of this Ordinance. Such other lawful action shall include, but shall not be limited to, an e • equitable action for injunctive relief or action at law for damages or foreclosures of liens. Nothing contained in this Ordinance shall be construed to limit or otherwise adversely affect an adjoining property owner's right to seek redress for • . damages resulting from a failed seawall or revetment. Section Five: Technical Specifications For Seawalls And Revetments. There is attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein a document entitled "Collier County Seawall and Revetment Regulations - Technical Specifications," consisting of pages one LOOK Q19 rarA 265 3 AWN 6-1 1 B ,e • through nine, inclusive of design figures. All seawalls and revetments constructed, reconstructed, repaired, altered, pro- • jected or prolonged in the County after the effective date of this Ordinance must meet or exceed these technical specifica- tions as follows: A. Minor repairs to the seawall or revetment which do not o necessitate physical alteration to the existing structural support system are exempt from the technical specifications. • B. Major repairs to the seawall or revetment which necessi- tate physical replacement of any portion of the structural • support system, except sheet piling, shall comply with the appropriate material specification of the technical specifi- • cations for the proposed repair only. • C. Reconstruction of any seawall or revetment requiring the complete reinstallation of the sheet pile portion of the structural support system, or any new seawall or revetment - • section installed Adjacent to or independently from any existing seawall or revetment shall require complete con- .. �. formance with all sections of the technical specifications for that portion of seawall or revetment. Failure to comply with these technical specifications shall constitute a vic.lation of this Ordinance. . Section Six: Conflict and Severability. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other • ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, t1:o more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or pertion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. _ ►_._� ' Section Seven: Effective Date This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice 1001( h i P 4 0 ., , , Of • � i "" :: . . . . .. . . . . b. from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been filed with the Secretary of State. . . DAtilis. January 8, 1985 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS . "'ATTESTtw' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ^,� , `itiLLl : .REACAN, Clerk y `�. w Byt .'4/;4 , • FREDE ICK J. VOSS, Chairman ilk I .w. .)fit e' .• r Xppi^ovad is to form and • ;,-• eq, 1, g fficiencyt R. ruce Anderson • • Assistant County Attorney 4' • STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER ) - ---- I, WILLIAM J. REAGAN, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a ., . true original of: . ORDINANCE NO. 85-2 which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners during Regular Session ' ' the 8th day of January, 1985. ' WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 8th day of January, 1985. WILLIAM J. REAGAN This ordinance hied with the Clerk of Courts and Clerk N• Secretory of$1p te's Otf Ex-Officio to Board of , , . .[faof(1�.,i fj County Ccrosni.eloners , end ocfunowledgenent of that • f{I weehnrd - ... of�� Q By �uty ' — - � ,�s,� Virgin 'Magri, Deputy 'eerie .« • tee.ar Cana . .. .',on . . . � R ' • • • 108R 01.9n,J. r• 5 r qt. . WINEll 114004 11"'"4 (:) 113 , . COLLIER COUNTY SEAWALL AND REVETMENT REGULATIONS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SECTION 1: DESCRIPTION • The work described in this Specification consists of the design old construc- • tion of waterfront upland property and building protection structures such as seawalls and revetments which serve to protect against wave attack and to sta- bilige the position of the shoreline. • The Design and Construction standards herein described shall provide minimum requirements for all seawalls and revetments constructed, reconstructed, repaired, altered, projected or prolonged. SECTION 2: DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS A. General 1. All plena and specifications for seawalls and revetments shall be prepared by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida. —�--- 2. The design of the structures shall adequately address all possible soil, live, dead and hydrostatic loadings existing during the life of the structure. D. Criteria 1. Soil and site parameters essential to the structural design are summarized on Figure 1. • 2. The active failure soil wedge on the upland side of the structure shall assume saturated soil to the top cap of the seawall/revetment. I. The low water depth on the vatervard side of the structure shall be assumed to he a "low, low" tide. • SECTION l: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS • ,• • A. Location • Seawalls shall be placed so that the vaterward fete of the wall is coincidental with the platted property or bulkhead line, if one exists, or at the intersection of the mean high water line with the existing shoreline. Revetments shall be placed so the exposed rock face intersects the platted property or bulkhead line at the mean high water line. B. Elevation The cap elevation for all seawalls and revetments fronting on protected tidal waters shall be equal to, or greater than, eleva- tion 4.5 feet N.G.V.D. (National Geodetic Vertical Datum) and equal to or greater than, 5.5 feet N.C.V.D. on open bays and channels. The elevation for all seawalls and revetments fronting on freshwater canals and lakes shall be equal to, or greater than, the local high water elevation as determined for a 25 year return frequency design storm event. $O K 019!X!2,68 Januar,/ 5, 1955 1 10 B . • , • C. Filling The only filling authorized herein shall be for backfill behind the seawalls or revetments and shall not extend any further water— • • ward than existing seawalls or revetments. The backfill shall be from upland sources and consist of suitable granular material free from toxic pollutant■ in other than trace quantities. At no time shall this Specification be construed to allow the filling of any County, State or Federal wetland. • D. Code Enforcement 1. The County Manager, or his designated representative, shall • review the plans and specifications to determine if all • appropriate Engineering Certifications are provided. Upon determination that all certifications are provided, the County • Manager, or his designated representative, shall issue a • Permit to perform such work. 2. At the conclusion of all permitted work relating to an indi- vidual 11 or revetment improvement, a certification by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Florida shall be provided to the County Manager, or his designated representative, verifying compliance with the design and • • construction requirements of this Specification. • E. Special Conditions The County Manager, or his designated representative, may waive/ Abate only those requirements detailed herein that are in direct conflict with existing conditions at or adjacent to the property location for the proposed ■eaysll or revetment improvements. �L Substitutions may be authorized by the County Manager, or his • designated representative, for seawalls or revetments constructed • of materiel and/or by methods other than as detailed in th:a Ordinance only if the design considerations of Section 2 herein are • complied with. This authorization does not allow substitution of Co any requirement detailed in Section 4 herein. SECTION 4: RESTRICTIVE SPECIFICATIONS A. General 1. The Standard Specifications of the Florida Department of • Transportation for Road and Bridge Construction, Latest Edition, shall govern all construction, including materials and workmanship, where applicable. 2. The references to tie—back rods and anchors in the following • subsections shall not be construed as a requirement by Collier County for that particular means of sheet piling support sys- tem but are included for Specification information purposes only. When utilized, the tie—back rode shall be straight between wall cap or waler and anchor plate. 3. Sheet piling shall be installed plumb in both the horizontal and vertical directions. • 100( 019J'IC 2.6.9 January R. ORS 2 MCI 10 IP • 4. Sheet piling shall penetrate into firm ground a minimum of • 40% of the total length of the sheet pile but never less than 4 feet. This penetration requirement may be abated in the . event the toe of the sheet pile can be embedded a miniumum of 12 inches in solid bedrock. • 5. The toe-berm of all sheet pile seawalls shall be protected by a stone rip-rap revetment placed on a filter fabric erosion control blanket in accordance with Section 4.D as follows: a. At locations where soils will not adequately resist toe-out failure by additional penetration depth alone; b. At locations where lateral tidal flows create excessive scour and erosion of the toe-berm; c. At any other location where the design Engineer deems it • necessary for the preservation of the integrity of the seawall. e • B. Concrete Sheet Pile Seawalls •� I. All seavalls under this Section may be of concrete, utilizing -- - the tongue And groove, nr other approved method of construc- • tion, with poured-in-place concrete cap. 2. Thi concrete shall have a minimum test strength of 3,000 psi after 28 days. 3. Each sheet piling slab shell have a minimum thickness of six inches and provide a minimum reinforcing steel cover of two and one-half (2y) inches of concrete. 4. The concrete cap shall not be less than 10 inches in thick- . noes, nor less than 16 inches in width, and contain one-half • (y) inch expansion joints of pre-molded sealer at all property a lines but in no case more than 100 foot intervals. 5. All tie-hack rods shall be of a size, material and compost- tion to ensure a three-to-one (3:1) safety factor under the , • design criteria outlined in Section 2.A.2. Tie rods shall be integral with the slab vertical reinforcing steel and be environmentally protected against corrosion by "hot-dip" galvanizing in accordance with ASTII A-153, epoxy coating in accordance with ASTM A-775, or any other equivalent protection • material. 6. Tie-rod anchors shall have not less than six square feet of h • vertical surface area perpendicular to the alignment of the tie-rod and be located within the area of full passive rests- . • tance. C. Aluminum Sheet Pile Seawalls 1. All seawalls under this Section may be of aluminum, with all members conforming to the appropriate ASTM standards so specified. 2. Sheet piles shall be fabricated from aluminum alloy 5052-H141, conforming to ASTM B-209 alloy 5052 for chemical composition; also having a minimum thickness of 0.125 inches and a minimum ultimate tensile strength of 35,500 p.s.i. • 400( 019r"270 January 8, 1985 3 , PIM . 0 B 3. Cap and joint extrusions shall be fabricated from aluminum alloy 6063-T6, conforming to ASTM B-221 alloy 6063 for chemical composition; also having a minimum thickness of 0.15 inches and a minimum ultimate tensile strength of 30,000 p.s.i. The cap shall be a minimum of six inches wide and five and three-quarters (5.75) inches deep. 4. Anchor rods and anchor plates shall be fabricated from aluminum alloy 6061-T6, conforming ASTH11-221 alloy 6061 for chemical composition; also having a minimum thickness of • 0.125 inches for anchor plates and a minimum diameter of 0.75 inches for anchor rods, both with a minimum ultimate tensile • strength of 38,000 p.s.i. Anchor rods shall be designed to ensure a three-to-one (311) safety factor under the design • criteria outlined in Section 2.A.2. 5. Installation procedures shall follow the guidelines and ♦ ' methods required by the aluminum seawall manufact.mer. 6. If the aluminum material is brought in contact with concrete, ' a coating of clear nethscrylsr. lacquer shall be applied to the aluminum contact surface to prevent corrosion. There shall be no dissimilar metal■ or metal systems bonded to the • . wall. D. Revetments I. The work under this :,ectiun is comprised of a heavy armor facing of precast co-crete block., natural stones and boulders, bags filled with sand-cement mixture of grout, or some other durable facing material placed on • stable natural • sloping shore. 2. The revetment shall be placed on • smooth, even, compacted slope with a gradient not exceeding one foot vertical drop for every two feet of horizontal distance. 3. All revetments shall be placed on • woven plastic filter - fabric in accordance with F.D.O.T. Specifications, Section 514. This fabric shall be overlaid by a layer of one inch to four inch atone which shall serve as a cushion for the armor layer protection. The fabric shall be folded over and anchored by larger rock at the toe of the revetment slope. '. The stone revetment armor layer shall be comprised of ' • boulders of sufficient quantity and size to withstand all tide and wave forts.. but in no case be less than that specified by F.D.0.T. Specifications Section 530. 5. Alternative armor layers of protection s.ay be sand-cement bags interconnected by 04 reinforcing dowels, in accordance with F.D.0.T. Specifications Section 530, "Armorflex", • "Terrafix", "Tri-lock" or any other approved interlocking, precast, modular concrete armor system. c Q • n i 19ira271 January g, 1985 4 .. 4' . . 151111 1011 • 10B : SECTION Si PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS y• These Specifications detail minimum requirements for seawalls and revetments which are to be constructed in Collier County. Individual design is the rsspon- sibility of the landowner, based upon specific site conditions, type of shore stabilisation structure desired, method of construction, and all other factors affecting the stability of the structure. These Specifications are minimum ' requirements only and are not intended to be a final design relating to a specific site or any other affecting conditions. • • 4 , s 01,911..t272 Y M ___• Y 0 y - • • • • P P • Y ✓ 0 C a at ✓ .. I. 7 0 ..1 F. G. • • F. • G • M w/ q ... 1 1/1 S 2 L• Y g ~ das P t J a q L L i Z ^ 7 7 • c •0 1 0 C < 7 4 L • ° c s v I v c : ) ..-R a o J t x 1n ° I • I I i • . __X W II • F-Q u � Zo - .- w— 0. , oho .� . . _ 0 • IS • y... • M off. U p . C N • t. _ c.} •. Y • O I.• • ✓ q Z►^ ' • .� > G • 0 VY d •• J L c •y OWW m • >. E : z O ✓ c Cr. G u 3 o-z0 E iC wca • l L • 7 : 1 Boa O19��•��273 ? m ' F . , . g a w �! 108 . .. . . • ••••....- . . . , . z . .. ., • .. . . , , ., r ..•....N 9 N1 - . • _ A r Imbed _... + •• 4.. IO I / (fir -P.11 I I I I I I I.I I I Illj -1:', --°'1 4._....._:i • , ..,, 1 —1---- / , .- • . !1:85-1 2 r'. N N Qf f7 h ,...!4 ;5 4 i N P �6=Min. CI! a�$o "v I � -� a . a fNg n • - lie li' n„ 1 , .--,,-. .1.1 . N 1 "4-_-. ` • o, ut X a: R 3 31 (Min.) 1. R �.. () '_r t • j / L z . W 5.9 , 1 LeL2:t I. • • \� ,e, I' --I Ss . . N I y _o } ill Slob R1 n i lo" CO • CO-D.-1 fc . . A if sr 1 • • 1 : j IT, -.. x la .9....- 9:1 di. F . 37 c6 ` v �_ R •a -in (TYP ) — ,, • F..i -+moo D f xi 0 N' N- • F-" I $ ° m ; L 3 '-4" k H N `A. fi .$a 019m-4214 £ 8,0614 . . t.osti;- _._ _ . . . ,. .51.4 1 132 • . R a v ' m t 2z1 I N -� A 2 2..\ (TYR) . ., : J•I IM1� fl -•0 1 AI r ii co r o r g .. rn 2 . o ■ -4 ' ass • . 2 ,.. az ..p .. _ al IT Al 2 - r I i • A "• = * t" J •• I i I !I' '-1. 17.1 I r _, ida . _ . _ ... s., % ril . • ....... ;› . r. _V i,l U 1 r • �s.—Sir ��_ [ern M '-1 N r'1 !. ° 1. 3 - --i = 3 cz2, o o / iE i ! o$• g 119 E s T$:411 11'1 y rAo M .�r� � = SOCK U19ret 2!J 4 1 .,11,10....._.--•-- ...... - > - • . .t9'' Establish Vegetation .f:*. ' -Armor Rip-Rap �,. _ &T9 of Bonk _`.wei : _./ _... _Rip-Rap Toe - 'us :),.. ...4:3,.. I' Protection & HWI , Stone Filler Cushion ,(Y r` emu' • Fitter Fabric TYPICAL STONE REVETMENT • • , Estoblts1 Vegetation �� . Y Too of Bank - — - -- f _, i . . • ..- Interlocking Blocks . HWL ' C� s_Grorel Blanket on ' AWL `' ;d- / Filter Fabic Seabed V ',---Filter Fabric r ice ,. . . _Stone Toe Protection . , TYPICAL, CONCRETE-BLOCK REVETMENT VI10 • 2,0 . O.J _y, Z . I 0 (yJ o 2 t--+--..._ _! tT _—__ _ w , i U _I I u.�$ IL, PLAN VIEW SECTION A-A =o WW a a U >- :8 t- TINERLOCG BLOCK w i Z .1a F . . uo 019 vs + rrl.! E Figure 4 a 1 E iS L' JP • , ,. , Agenda Item No. la " Agenda Item Topic /y1r /i - 5 (ForPublicComment,listtopic) ` G Meeting Date: �;.®_ Name: 1 ld..%AI!`� Address: 2tt c0' /1 > '- /( f, � , Representing/Petitioner: Other /Y/.�i , ` , COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ' ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT ' YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. "- PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS-PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY r 4h ■ IkgellUa 'lei!' IIV. I(I 0 y UUllIV IUt nrr.I.ir _a aorrar x.—,,--- I.*-4"1,. :, (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting Date: fq °3 I I a.a,'(4-1-' -,. \ Name: i c 1C.(i; .k...k, l‘4,,.0-o oL I Address; r;a ).... s. r il'i5ft t 1 0- Other: . RepresentinglPetitioner: - `r, I`"h tlL 11 Vie' COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53,AS1AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING iN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR Jr AI in■ •ra...ri,T,n.,n7 iforrn,ncn TA DC A Gh01 Ine CrIP CFI F-pfpnlvinnnw PI IRI tn.(flMMFt,LT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING s, i Agenda Item No. l ti 8 Agenda Item Topic (c �.L;,l. ci i,,, s c, (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting ate: I F:, i I a 0 / / ` 9 /1 , Name: 1-4a,/'c,.; I 'l v� v-2_ Address: 6 7 L� / —4// S t.-� /cs 1�t1 - : RepresentinglPetitioner: /�n 4 k, o f 1‘9/ I C -. Other: I COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO 2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR , PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING t THEIR.RI ICIMFSS_RFRCf)NIlI..Rf I ITICKW(A rip(IT1.1FO FflPMS f1c sr)c PRf)MATIf)M WII I RE..IlCKFr1 Tri I FIlIJF TI-P'RMII!6A r` Agenda Item No. ice-) Agenda Item Topic La. 7,1,111 11 s tt.4 //),5131,,t (For Public Comment,list topic) kt a Meeting Date: -44—.-(' I I, ._L'l q x Name: JIM �.C"&I V Address: v5`3 '��a_. 6 1 r sit �a x Representing/Petitioner: . ` °Ikc`ri I�re-S Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN tt 1 ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE ', ~-- , 4 Agenda Item No. iO Agenda item Topic f_. 11 n ',/,(11_,,t_.)11,/,<S . ( \ (For Public Comment,list topic) Opt' 0 t g Meeting Date: 1 I.,;1 I t 2 01' ( Name: ,,,r f I t')ru a.; Address: °II Li: ran i Iii, Gt.f a.., RepresentinglPetitioner. T�t6 � V'rt'_`_� Other: 6 t COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53 AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004.055 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY r COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT 4+ ,: YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR 4 PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. \fi 4 -' p PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS-PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY iiii Agenda Item No. r c Agenda Item Topic L J41)(150-(&.., b' ? "'' (For Public Comment,List topic) Meeting Date: C '7 e- i i r x�' ) fifitt � / ���, � Name: burr 5nC?.t Address: `f � IyJ JJL Lt,l y Representing/Petitioner:COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE 140.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2409 0 AN Other: 5 D 2047 24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BU7 NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING'THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT ;,� YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING } THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS—PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY F r ::,„,. r Agenda Item Na Agenda Item Topic L-4 Pe{) fit, , g (For Public Comment,list topic) ri Meeting Date: 22//// ` —�- 1-,6, Name: r- { (41 Addtess: ( ) / t�r} tl' Representing/Petitioner; � � ' o lfrt-' Other:, COWER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY "F COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT : '1. YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE W ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS-PLEASE'PRINT CLEARLY is f ,g t''. Agenda Item No Ids Agenda Item Topic Prr , �` (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting Date: I I I H J - jjName: �� 1 �`[c(/�tr Address: �� � ./ .� n 1 Representing/Petitioner: Oct( t-t-' / � � � �; Other: � COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003 53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY , COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR ' PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS-PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY It Agenda Item No. fth,: Agenda Item Topic _A- Pe �s �z ` ( Comment,list topic) >a g� For Public C Meeting Date: J , ((.( � Name:� � "'41 Address: .6tGrss 7 ;14- 1 C 3rP1/�-- Representing/Petitioner: �e �f o ` �-' " ` Other: l.. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE N0.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2v04.,'"1 004 05AND 2407 24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING I ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS},REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE !tel., BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT 1 YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR' , PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTJOI+I PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POUTICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL 8E ASKED TO,LEAVE THE PODIUM y' PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LIFT OF THE DAIS—PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Agenda Item No. /O r6 Agenda Item Topic 10 r p (S J (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting Date: .L/(((0G I it Name: 0.5/4 irY7a(2-((tV7 Address: � 4-*1 � � � t;� 3 ' RepresentinglPetitioner CPS MAp -I-"o ,�4 j ez;,e ( ; � Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN a �` ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE t /, BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING r THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS-PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Agenda Item No. 11' c Agenda Item Topic L,. Pew (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting Date: 2/ I I/I 4 Name: \rS\Iva Yec.rcA.'"" Address: lc-)En F.. .,,C. '1' K, .1,.3 RepresentinglPetitioner: G cLQ T.vile av � -e.c. ( r't- ,` Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE ' BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKFD To I FCVF TI4P cnnil no Agenda Item No. Agenda Item Topic /p, . (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting Date: cam'��jj —/ (7 Name: AI 1/ G 1 1 Address: _ Representing/Petitioner: Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR ' PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING 7- THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Agenda Item No. 10 # Agenda Item Topic A A'/,`-"' iii/s4(./ I (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting Date: ( -//////cT AI Name; t /�rG/1f t'i- Address: LI-7: Lt 0 e se 4l V �j " - , RepresentinglPetitioner: s' /4 Other: / COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO.2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST a F. SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE.BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR r PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOT)ON..PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR.BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. , PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO"THE LEFT OF THE DAIS-PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ` rag: 1 Agenda Item No. ° Agenda Item Topic / _ r f 0 / (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting Date: e2,jf,,////y �ry Name: /t,� . '.G*✓.0r�, Address: /0 `_ `f 5(9^ 144,.... -f` /Representing/Petitioner: C ^jr. t y� C- r" `t4 1''4 ", t s j Other COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO 2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINM CE 2004.05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BO ARBOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND D OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE �'. RECOMS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR .• PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. I PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS-PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Agenda Item No. " ,D Agenda Item Topic / ' 0e2 A ` (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting Date: 77"J `1 / r 4 V s Name: �l : c-" e kJ, fw, ,.,., 5 Address: 'a ti , ', c"--6i../ /*`�I r• Representing/Petitioner: -/„ Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO 2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY t �•- I COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR ' PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. y PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS-"PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY, .5 Agenda Item No. /of) Agenda Item Topic LA Pe-ill 05Le i F 1115,f3 L4 (For Public Comment,list topic) Meeting Date: j 4, H 1 "i I Name: N a4 Ck .8r� hrt,cYLS Address: Gi�. ( a I tilt�l5L(.! JU Representing/Petitioner: k.a��t 1C-e...471 Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO,2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR k PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS...PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY Agenda Item No. /012) Agenda Item Topic t V)(11 i)n5cc( . Y' 6 t. ''' (For Public Comment,list topic) ,, g 2.-b I/ / c:2.0 1 L�' Meeting Date: #- Name: .\ ) I+'1<'( x-Tu a, - Address: ( Representing/Petitioner: ci I)"+1) 7x_1:(-L Other: COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO 2003-53,AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 2004-05 AND 2007-24,REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYIST ,4,t SHALL,BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES(INCLUDING,BUT NOT LIMITED TO,ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY 1 COMMISSIONERS),REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT YOU ARE LIMITED TO THREE(3)MINUTES FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND ARE TO ADDRESS ONLY THE CHAIR PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A FORUM FOR SELF-PROMOTION. PUBLIC COMMENT SPEAKERS WHO ENGAGE IN ADVERTISING THEIR BUSINESS,PERSONAL POLITICKING OR OTHER FORMS OF SELF-PROMOTION WILL BE ASKED TO LEAVE THE PODIUM. PLACE COMPLETED FORM ON THE TABLE TO THE LEFT OF THE DAIS-PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY V _... ..-,.. _..< .... .,.,ter .....ate.......,, h: ,,,,._