HEX Final Decision 2014-36 HEX NO. 2014—36
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
PETITION NO. SV-PL20140001151 —Two Lakes of Naples, LLC requests a variance from
LDC 5.06.04.F.1, which limits multiple-occupancy parcels with 150 feet or more of public
street frontage to one pole sign, or two pole signs if there is a minimum of a 1,000-foot
separation between such signs, to instead allow two pole signs with a minimum of a 570.52-
foot separation, for the Two Lakes commercial condominium, located within the Two
Lakes Plaza PUD, Ordinance 00-63, on the east side of U.S. 41, in Section 9, Township 48
South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
DATE OF HEARING: November 13, 2014.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval.
FINDINGS:
Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant and the public,
and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Section
5.06.08 B of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition should be approved.
ANALYSIS:
One member of the public from the adjacent residential area to the east requested additional
information and clarification pertaining to the sign location, how the applicant's property is
divided, and illumination of this second sign. The applicant explained their reasons for the
separation between signs, and that any lighting of this sign will be limited to that allowed by the
LDC. The applicant noted that both the increased preserves along the north of the property as
well as the splitting of the south parcel to another entity created the necessity for a reduced
distance as requested by this variance.
DECISION:
Petition SV- PL20140001151, filed by Chris Lascano of Phoenix Associates of South Florida,
Inc., on behalf of Two Lakes of Naples, LLC, is hereby approved for a variance from Section
5.06.04.F.1, to allow two pole signs with a minimum of a 570.52-foot separation, for the Two
Lakes commercial condominium located within the Two Lakes Plaza Planned Unit Development
on the property hereinafter described, in accordance with the Proposed Site Plan attached as
Exhibit "A".
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—Proposed Site Plan
[14-CPS-01339/1130408/1]30 1 of2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See the Two Lakes Plaza PUD, Ordinance No. 00-63.
APPEALS:
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as
amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County
Commissioners, Collier County. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing
Examiner Decision is rendered.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS
DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL
USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Date Mark Strain, Hearing Examiner
Approved as to fo and legality:
Scott tone
Assistant County Attorney
[14-CPS-01339/1130408/1130 2 of 2
MI MOM DOI NI MAI.01.1.04..141.WOfw*CCt Mas,¢u-}w IVO NW 11.D,13.Ya
_ 11a 1_ ' \\ ( XHIBIT A
,,l
+-- + WIT aM,0,t a I t I I
+ i ` - d I I I I
+4 i fI I I I I
h.,..k‘k i 1 I I . II
i CPcP ■ e I I I1
I z m-"i ce_ I I$I
1 _ A"0 2pate,__ 15 1. p lai
t6F 1+ ++++++ I++++ + r + J _=
/ m
. ,. a I I I I
I I I
¢ + + + + + - + +
+ + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + 0 I I ! II 11 1 i i
1 I I I
I1 t I I I+ + + + + + + + + +
�+ + + r'' F a 1 1 I I
I++++ I CO `y ._ I I I I I sa •�c 4 ICJ
B _i + + I Tm 1y A RI! T =
+ + 1 ■ M M a . -i r
.
y rrl
+ + Eii 1 i 5 9 I
+ +?E i I P
+ + , 1 g I I I I i+ + +�' \s, aoo I I I
+ + + sic I I I
.+ + + + � ;_,22 11 I
+++++++++ . `��� a m I I I
+ + + + + + I> 1 I I I
riffp,tr a;i+ + + + + + + .. 11 I
ty t + + + + + + + I I I 1 I
`` �S i
I i 't + + + + + + + + I 'III
•-i•#19? i+ + + + + + + + + I I I I
to i I
I. + + + + + + + t T Imo_ I I I
AI 9 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + - + + \1, I I I
�.,°.ib h c I+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + • I I I I 1
+ + + + + + + + -$ + + + + + + + + + +-1-,,,=i. +
II I
HI€ t;1 i+ + + + + + + + +: + + + + 4 *1 it + + + °F4 + 4 1 1 I
I,Ef + + + + + + + + 5E• + + + + +{ _R + + + + + I I I
ri 111 , 'u + + + + + + + + 1 + + + + + a + + +', + + H I I
i#;i p d i + + + + + + - + + + + + + - + + + +1°r + +
"1= i? + + + + + + + + +°,,2, + + + + + -Rs; ' + + + + + o H I I
i& i + + + + + + - + iar + + + + + f;{t + + + +d., + +„,•, I I I
iu;C g+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + -CF,;.,,. + + + .' +:'r+ H I I
I E a + + + + + + - + Fr + + + + + f..,i'+ + + +,� +„ H I I
It e�I, `i+ + + + + + + + 1- + + + + + -0& ; + + + I I I
- I + + + + _ „„+ + + + + + § + + + +
• •••• ,+ + + + •,+ + - + + + + + + - I I I
6A*iiii + + + +. - + + + + + 11 I
` ry 0 II I 4'
_'\ H I I
B r% \\, 11 1
{1- ------- 1/4•. J�' ' I I I
$ Z & .-- 1, I I 1 r
5�0 — ill I
A Q,�DDID•NIFTDDEOmDLMSDfHI,✓ 4I I I
4 _ &EKAt0EO..MDD)owENIPON.ws .....000......DAT®masmN
•♦DDEO510∎1GI MUGS 1.511 CDILO;COUNTY m111154T 18fD1 DATED 0615f2014
CA D''' "",is Ur TWO LAKES PLAZA` 4.55e,..;,,,-.5 'P H O E N I x
= .....GR4'4llb\_ SECTION 09-TOWNSHIP 485-RANGE 25E P+ e P'v ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH FLORIDA,INC.
.. < : wt.. i\� NAPLES FLORIDA AI yoH,y,y,d„�D,�,y"yswy,a„Ia Ma.... r.mgieum
E 3 V fs7� \ COLLIER 1 , - ■ GOO*a.+�--+- m+
a.,..a ofDSnsmu \( SIGN VARIANCE ) `:4 • r..====. �STa..7.=”�2�—_l
151 SCALE 1.-50,0' •` .•9 --• / .._ w_:..tr 1.z r