Resolution 1984-206 k
it
November 6, 1984 gym; ",`
j Y
RESOLUTION 84 06 ,titn •,
RELATING TO PETITION FDP0-84-V-13 FOR A !,�� �W
• c VARIANCE FROM THE MINIMUM BASE FLOOD ' k rfilly s'
i"a `' ELEVATION REQUIRED ` BY THE FLOOD DAMAGE r , }',,y, .
PREVENTION ORDINANCE (ORD. NO. 79-62) ,:k, "��,
t r ;, '' , i` , .,.
WHEREAS, the petitioner-Ebb Tide'Club Condominium desires to build'a oolrl ,
° . 'il''''.,:,':',.'''';:•":'''''.',.'.L ': bath at 871 Collier Court (Lot 32, Block 338, Marco Beach Unit 10) and has r� ; `
requested' a variance from the Minimum Base Flood Elevation required by,,,` the,,,,,,g11�4 , , �� .
Ord. No. 79-62; and, � .,
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a g pp public hearing as i
required by laws has reviewed Petition FDPO-84-V-13 in accordance with Section
° i' 18 (5), (6) and (7), and has made a finding that the granting of this petition �; `
complies with the intent and purpose of Ord. 79-62 as follows: ,i" �i„:„.,,,,,,,.
<
(5) The 6' reduction from the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 13' `'' �1',.` t "
National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) requirement to 7' NGVD is �h*
the minimum variance necessary, considering the flood hazard. ;}xt,'
(6) The variance is issued upon: yf
(a) A showing of
' q good and sufficient cause based on review of � a �� Y»•
� Ski,•,.,
c
considerations contained in (7) , following. A
(b) A determination that failure to grant the variance would result � ' �{"�,
,' in exceptional hardship to the applicant. P f
(c) A determination that the granting of a variance will not result
, in increased flood heights, additional threats to public
? safety, extraordinary public expanse, create nuisances, cause _i �f
:rand on or victimization of the public, or conflict `with 4 ,��
exiting local laws or ordinance.
' ' (7) In passing upon this variance, the Board of Zoning Appeals has .,..a ,i;
considered all technical evaluations provided to,it, all relevant } f `
factors, the standards specified in Ordinance No. 79-62, especially f,, +,�
those contained in Paragraph 18 (7) (a-1). �' ..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals, that 1, .
Petition FDPO-84-V-13 is hereby ''�j
y granted subject to the following conditions: ,„,
• n, 1. The variance shall be for the reduction of the Minimum Base Flood . ' '
' Elevation required by Ord. No. 79-62 from 13' feet NGVD 'to 7' NGVD. Ff '
2. - The Chief Administrative Official shall mail a copy of this'Resolution to , �` . r'
the Petitioner by registered return receipt and such mailing shall
w .,,,,,'•,,.:,,,,, , constitute compliance with Section 18, Paragraph (10) of Ord. No. 79-62
which reads as follows: � r x ,
e ,FaS !
.Any applicant, to whom a variance is granted, shall be given '" v.
t, written notice that when a structure is permitted_�to be ,built ' s� `,, °,2
with the lowest habitable floor elevation below the''base ,flood s ,
4 r' elevation, :the' costa of flood insurance:will" commensurate*with , �;,� r
f
,� the increased rislt resulted from the reduced.'''lowest habitable ,.S” a ,
floor elevation." � r r ' ,f,:
td
Y
i v t o F
i00( 084 rgt 118 , ,t Ft ..
' by * 4..,+,j $ ,u' 4�'tf R
Q November 6 1984
4:� a,`„ 3. The granting of this variance has ,been predicated principally on the � 4�
a engineering data and information,provided by the'petitioner and;ar`reviews r , 4 1 �jy;�°,
_� of same with respect''to the r considerations required by the,Ordinance No:� ;��
t 8 ''7{ 1 Y ! h �tb 3�.4F7
v a dtiu 17-v2. y 145'�fi ' 14;`7 j1Y t ky� � '
.t�
d;?r ` The granting of'' this variance r by the Board of',Zoning Appeals doe{d ''} `� , � ,'a
';' ti ' not make or imply'any,assurances that the subject property or structur�b ,i '£i ? pbY� ,,,
' YE are not subject to flood damages, ..
d „t , l'Orf.„',..;,.',.,„,tFurther, the granting of,this,variance shah not.create liability on , y, ti7 ,. the part of Collier County?or,by any officer or employee thereof for ark 7", r,�},, ;
flood damages that result from reliance on this variance or .
f � , /+,5d°r aka
administrative decision lawfully made thereunder. ,. ;„ „Y r,,",,„
In accepting this variance, the petitioner assumes all qtr. '�'
res onsibility for »„ <t+ � ��
r . p any property deimage resulting from its application. . �'�
�7� Commissioner Pieter motioned, seconds by Commissioner ,,� '
Voss for the adoption of this Resolution. Upon call for a� ';r
4g{`` the vote, the motion parried, ; ,i ,,1 •.
y , ,,Sax
2 ' DATE: November 6, 1984 : BOARD.OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ,, , ,r” ' ,,
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
x
e. r, f'
BY:; ` WILLIA• ,. , CLER _ " , CHAD x � °�
"C
. '',',i;.,,),, r 3 : . / it'.'" '‘'' ./•••.• ' ' . . ;'..., '',:.). L'',..,;'.L.1', , . `';' �',�,� f
`,h'
Approved as to form tapal curflclanc 9, ,
1ST, County Attor `,
,s
0.
flag
1?,:,;:: i a
St
6 k
k t•
G
�',u_aarr p ,.t '.L '1'
,,,'..i...,;.;‘,..., _ 4�tb0 Y ;Y,
44 s
,pgq�i'� 5 ,.'.,.,',.:,,A.4.,
b�;v��4 , h'+ ‘
� d
S tsl. 4. �rk� r d
r' 2�1 Y
r. ���r TMcD/sgg/MON r�+ `ti ,t �� ', t,
1� Planning Dept. ,�r ` i' ,b"� .
�, Z , ? rr 'z4'', tr 3v .(