Loading...
Resolution 1984-027 ' ; 6Y�-. r,r 7 b M`. '; a'y.., r ''!,` " , r e ;1 .. o- . t '!'. r ti4 "A6+k ' " '° r.o.4 � 0 dt Y"Yd S ° ,�t's'dM1Aidqr'�. r w; 4 b !t !� � „,,,,',..;,,/,..,,.,.!$ a t4° ,m t 5 , rr r ° ',vi e 'te $W a u ^ r / 1 g+t a ��, �r , $� s} � ' •� i" r.. pdr �+e,'� t r a r 4,C P h!r ,rl t,k 3 ,d x �tl r1„ F `+ r } " k c r �, ,') e v s , Y +h ea g.,q { .4,101:r n w n r�.r! 4 t { k , W Fim„£r is it+ . � , 0 ° t) t '� fi Hk ° k, ; a I k',RESOL TZON 84b 1 r 7 4;r� t;;t . ;) '+ L s,,; ",9? p 1 r ‘'SY r ; e. r i `v °” �Y � ; � d Rt o 4; � da1/”r'Y 4 r•s ;�o-t) „f .i l t� v 4 4'4;1,7.'4' .3 r r Yl - `• C ,V'r FOR AVk IANL F I!RO ' ' ` k 7F Y 4 a. 4 0� ""`` o r " ' RELATING .TO PETITION FDPO-$4- 1 ARC 2 r�` a,„k t�,a �;�,'' , U 248 MUM RASE �OOD'�ELEVATION NgQUIR� 11Y �HE , � ,w inO PAGC , ORDINANCE O fDINAN R NtMg$R ' x � " s�°`�,4 FLOOD AMAGEPREVE TYON % r.,n I'' '. ,1 t li s �r F d i' 8t ,4 y S t ,i• 4 4t ti ' 6<Mt „;�a4• . _ 4 a' a”i ', tV rte 3 x � Ati ,' ii' WHEREAS► the petitioner Edward R. Moulton has built a,ein lea s ilY1 1g�u b� - '4k44'"'4 ', �''� home at 188 columbua Way' g !dr:.' ,11► `W ,, y (Lot 7, Block 276, Marco' Beach Unit 8) ,and hae� C S S ,rl requested a variance from the Minimum Base Flood Elevation required ibloA 1 , . Ordinance Number 79-62; and, , A +� +MA'��M�+Yr �. ,.•... }:r r4 4a 1�S N t' WHEREAS, the''Board"of ZoningAppeals has�held "a pu%1lar �ng a r,x� required by -law; has reviewed Petition FDPO-84-V-1 in accordance with r= ' ��,our r Section 18 (5), (6) and (7), and has made a finding that the granting of thin petition complies with the intent and purpose of Ordinance Number �, t � , 79-62 as follows: r"' -" �' : �'a hl`4rfis ,. „.. (5) The 0.49 foot reduction from the Flood Ynsur ante Rate Map ,'': `�et' �¢ (FIRM) 13.0' National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) requi» `,, �9' `x ` " t�v A � cement t o 12.81' NGVD is the minimum variance necessary, a,. considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. r4� . (6) The variance is issued upon: ...,..... i.'„ 04,4,4,-..,./.., wp of 0tw g good and sufficient cause based on review df �' (a) A showing considerations contained in (7), following. krr , Al ��' (b) A determination that failure to grant the variance would � ` " 7 4 ' result in exceptional hardship to the applicant. 41` � ,�r ( a (c) A determination that the granting of a variance ,will' not � �` 1i�7"{' result in increased flood heights, additional threats. t,; � � g public safety, extraordinary public expense, create , r nuisances, cause,.fraud,..on, or:,;.victimiaatla v �; - or conflict with existing local laws or ordinances, .,,4 ���s# 0 ' ' (7) In passing upon this variance, the Board of Zoning Appeals has ��ra� ' M1 h: ��tkt F considered all technical evaluations provided to it, all` {g4 ,,,,., relevant factors, the standards specified in Ordinance Nutiabe* "� ; w �`nx4 t' P 1 4Fak P 79-62, especially those contained in Paragraph" 18 ( )(al)� � y 04- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Zoning Appeals, that, ' ^3`. , 6 Petition FDPO-84-V-1 is hereby granted subject to the. �followinE � � � r ,rr `{ conditions• fi A vf ' 0� a Z ��i yg�w�' 0.5 ` 9, tM' 1. ` The variance shall be for` the reduction of the Minimum,,8ase ` oil 41.; �` Elevation required by Ordinance Number 79-62 from 13,0 feet �0 `", a '�k, ^ ��{y12:51 feet NGVD, �r; ; ,� ) ,• ^ �4`� {A ��''': l a ry i S "'E s 4 t"3 vrpk-7y ,{ir?r ' - �,..- �sa,'�yes ; 'd �� � �`�'�� •t � � �r vtx c ,��4 ��� �9�i"��;s,t'yr bra �b : 2. ,The '.Chief Administrative".Official Chill ma 1 , ,. l) i i 0 , t ry ; Resolution to the ,fix°°� ° � , pe�i•tiaher by �M�ittired rl��ur�t1 r�ea+t;� � `� ;k r�r � ���y)�r.�, _ ,� mailing ,ehaiX diiaitue,�Y slin4 , 4 k"i lyyi iii' r 4141 �''9ar-, )':' ° ,,;�, ;��'• u,„ 1 std 4n ' t, At)s i�'k,:r 'kr x� ) Y1,n yry,,. ¢ akiee1go {,A 7t>at'r { k;T i @4p, 7} ofOdit►an r� J/g h u '�Jy,0 'y A�9A}}Y�yyi °' 0 1 e�V+ : n.. °?�y7q °k . �.yd � ����� f,��+ 1 �� �bef Ylv;:"� 1C'�h�c1� teak ;fV��� �V��� Y 1.� '1 4 1 S �, %� 5 r y,;;' t.� t i 'k' 7g ' ° rh#1 tf $'�4fk)rap.7 Hy P,. ; O�' i 1. ,,� v�... ,k'z!a4 v ¢4 g e ,Jt, 4kt)�r )tti-' a its, i `rRilsVik 1 y,i{u`$J'1r'4.4��)y4✓4 i s+dA 4�it'' ?p9 ° '��., }�d) , vj CC )C „ •'+' r .`.:4 r t°e 'ii o 4 .;' �y y7.'it is�, • of; 4.i,i �4/,q,,,4,i $E�M 4 nti tiN4.,,k4tk 1 4 yf k �;'41p r,q ;.j ' � � Y p �` �ya4 b:: x s �i f yl .:,..,'.!,.;.,1,,,'"?.�i �91 `A F�^4te �h,,11p f ,p t ., .' St kl':' ,}� i gap' 41 ! * lir J ? i� rt, r A't3k4k,L� Ai,1y°`� ,. 3 '< t nr•fy .9... Nk,f�w�+.a yr "' +nw t yro. �'iM kA`�"? f',1 ` 'ti . ........... j.i "�; (fi fi r 1 S,te • +r �. , ty }s sy Y A yb(Aa' t i ,",1 .� ' x 3 u r.£' '� '' fA `,4 i ,i, 4 Feb'uar 14 1 e .rib �< * f i•�� gu y applicant► 'to whom g'variance fe granted► shall rey 3 r ,l �4 'fib A� l4y-; y 1, ('� be. given written='notice' that ��when� a `atruetuie ia` ;z ' y r,,," • i, ;° �'E^ permitted to be built,with the'lowest Floor ilevato0d,-4�'�,, A 4 ,�, k �`,`� ,s below "the .base �� �,� �, 1 flood `e14Vati0n� the;.Coat ,of f100d' ,�9''1 t x - ; insurance wi11 be .' .. „ , ,'"�' . , ,h v } f,'omgtenat#rate'with the inaxaaaed�iiak �.�4 `,`� resulting from they reduced lowest 'f1oor livet3o i '• � ,; q£��4j b ; ,, 9. `The granting of Ehisilvariance has.',een 'predicated p in e X Q w , ' the engineering data and: inforetation`provided by`�''thb petl� „?`�'�,� ` ti , a- review of same with respect',to .the conaiderationa, Ye u,r d ;1i, Ordinance Number 79-62. The r ���? Y oi t'���, granting of this variance by the Board of Zoning i �� ' Appeals does .not tasks,.or imply en- a.. that'`the Feuj acct b ,. ya Property or structures,are not subject to flood damagesiIP 61 ''�'' �t , '� „, Further► the granting of this°variance shait' riot•`.ar to � `` t}gs ;. k ' ° liability on the part of ;Collier Count or any ;. a , ', y y of or �� � `y employee thereoffor any flood damages that result from,J 1 " reliance on this variance or an admini �� Y is dee�i,iion s ;'' lawfully made thereunder. �� +� ti ` ¢ % u'1 �d f „ � Im accepting this °'variance,w�the °petitioner `assume.+ all"� -' 4 spy °k ;b responsibility for any property damage resulting from its .. application. ,�1� °� '' Commissi©ner 1'istor � ' ; � �,� ���� . motioned, seconded by Commissioner , , `.,{?' Vdss for the adoption of this Resolution. upon :Cali '1,, N for the vote, the notion curried. ��£ �, ' a 4.' r ,,, 3 �rd Y @; "" ` DATES February 14, 1994 BO OP COUNTY, COt.AIISSYOI�ERB � s '`rs CO-- CO�JB1TY, FLORIDA �; a�, ,..,,,',',,,P4,•, ,' ATTESTS l��fj� ' `�`„r' ' ` ,�' ° ? �J li LIAM J REACAN, CLERK BY! C 2, ^ EB .Ua3Rrsar '. , , �� J� a ` �.a���� "� M`o • f Y 1� !IYM,l�ilffirMxu"M iFna'y,1im,Wy „Y�y � MSL aY���"i ) T g1,d�r a,*i ,?anan+µu�,,f..n�.wanWa'! .yC+r W+X drt 'A 3In f a /i ,,,4 i�� a £� A4�„4�r a`�I��� r k 5a4 #; 'j f�,,,9 a t ,'1 �S {{ s� p fir r �4���7� `� a dst� ,,yy„„� t t,s, i °7 y�rpp' >� $ �ly���7��p�r ,�+ �� L , 4 s � ,S ytie4 �` `'M1 �r Wks pw7? l° ' "• "'� tip G ds t r y, i ar Pl ' ?� f4,,i,,;'9 {4 7 •t ;:,7„,,,,,..,,,!,,;-,,,,,..;.4,1,•,,„.,,,,,,:t srb t � >< ; 4hg rk�21 t( �1�i1� fr�£`h� r X6:8 t a ' i6� '4 �; , t '` 4YK. r n, ”+e7�$4' + r,+ ahs.,�4 'i g� 4 4� �t >, yid jj ^i, fZ4,. „'•4 +. a s j,5;,, 5 f,P4''>rft{ �4'' 44%4 e d��:-" .i.` e "faq `*5�. s.'"', 2' �'� 4y�� ,psp 9�'' �s i. +t.� , �+ n ti ' y 'n t t,r„1wz, r n a w•1••, ,'4�t y", �.r& b,i t 1 's M'�" 3 4s r, d „,� ,�” , ', 4"1",,i,. 1.� ,a ,m, ££� . C o ,14. ti ,,�i ' ,j '.. } , C C±v t ., c, h u v,` , ..,.. ,,,,1 ,,,J 1 (� Y'�F { ' a �ter MY' a d v f,,, r >m tt ` �i,, ')> i', 0. e. r f. ,,. u t1,, Jl ,�Y k, ;_, w £iW,f$,,,•,:i•,. r , y s Ic.,P9A� r i A ,1.4 ,•0 snot,, k"% . ., y rt � �� ,' Vn 'P'' ,,qq O H ' 'a X�'da >t l•r v n0� � t y t ,, bh + 4■t,a1,K, :a'Xbhq ` "'�1 } 6, tt it �i �+,�WS .?1�' ti -!b.j t f k +' tr �'`;-=ra1�k a q � `,m �` sM,�4""H fa'