Loading...
Memos Division of MEMO Public Safety To: Bob Franceschini, Purchasing Services From: David G. Kainrad l\ Subject: EMS Billing Contract `. Date: July 30, 1996 Since Purchasing Services played an important role in the securing of an outside ' "' C':- vendor to perform ambulance billing services for EMS, I wanted to provide your department with an update of how the program is going. I would like to preface, that `, j the contracting of a professional service to handle the entire billing and collections system for EMS, is proving to be most beneficial to both Lee County and it's residents. The billing vendor, Ambulance Medical Billing Inc. (AMB), took over the ambulance billing and collection services from the Lee County Tax Collector, on April 1,1995. Since that time and after a rather hectic transition of records and information between the two agencies, AMB has done both a professional and admirable job for Lee County. As an example, in comparing the amount of revenue collected by AMB during the first six months of the current fiscal year, to that of what the Tax Collector's Office recorded in the same time period the previous year, AMB records reflect a 48% increase in revenue collection. Also, for your information, EMS anticipated that the revenue collection for Fiscal Year 96 would be $3,500,000.00. As of this date, AMB has collected over $4 mil. and could realistically reach the $5 mil. mark before the end of the fiscal year. This would equate to a 43% increase in the anticipated collection of ambulance billing revenue. Lee County benefits intrinsically with the use of an outside billing vendor by having all monies mailed to a bank lock box of the County's choice. The money is counted, recorded and deposited in the County's account on a daily basis. This allows Lee County to begin earning interest immediately on the revenue collected. The revenue is placed in Lee County's General Revenue Pool, that enables the County's Finance personnel to make short or long term investments as needed on behalf of Lee County. The revenue may also be used to pay off bonds secured for capital projects. In summary, it has proven advantageous for Lee County out -source the ambulance billing services. In my honest opinion, EMS would not have been able to put the detail bid specifications together without the assistance of Purchasing Services. The guidance and direction Purchasing provided this department during the entire bid process was invaluable and beneficial Bob Franceschini, Purchasing Services Page 2 July 30, 1996 Should you desire additional information regarding the data provided, please do not hesitate to contact me at 335-1600. Other wise, I will endeavor to keep you apprised of the development with the EMS billing program. Thank you. 7 MEMORANDUM TO: Joe Young, Chairman Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council FROM: Diane B. Flagg, Director Emergency Services Department. DATE: April 30, 1996 RE: EMS Department Operations Report I am in receipt of your correspondence regarding a request for a monthly EMS Department operations report. It will be our pleasure to develop a report for the members of EMSAC. Lt. Paul Weber has been asked to compile the activities for presentation at the monthly EMSAC meetings. Please do not hesitate to contact our office if we may provide any further assistance. DBF/sr cc: Lt. Paul Weber 04/17/1996 09:34 18133942263 JOSEPHPY,OUdig PAGE 01 17 April 1996 To: Diana Flagg Director, SS Freon: Joe Young Chairman, SNSAC It will be helpful to the Council if you would please give an MS Update at each of our monthly meetings. This update could include such its as your discussions with the City of Naples, the need for an alternate site in North Naples because of traffic complications, noteworthy 1'i6IS rescues, problems as they occur and actions to solve theca etc. This would give a formal approach to everyday programs instead of having them kind of incidentally come out (if at all) as part of the meeting. Thanks for you continued support of SaC. Cc R. Saunders \ 1. LAW OFFICES VEGA, STANLEY, ZELMAN 8C HANLON, P.A. SHARON M. HANLON JOHN F.STANLEY GEORGE VEGA,JR. 2660 AIRPORT ROAD SOUTH THEODORE ZELMAN NAPLES, FLORIDA 33962-4899 PAULA J. RHOADS TELEPHONE(941) 774-3333 JOHN G. VEGA TELECOPIER(941)774-6420 THOMAS J.WOOD OF COUNSEL THOMAS R. BROWN June 17, 1996 1, 7 r ^ f( EMSAC attn: Joe Young, chairperson Re: vote proxy At a recent meeting, a question was posed of whether a voting committe member • could give their vote proxy to another member without first dictating what candidate to vote for. The committee members were concerned that if a voting member gave their proxy vote to another member, which they can do under the revised EMSAC bylaws, they first had to dictate the candidate of choice. Our revised bylaws do not address this question. Corporate attorney's informed me that bylaws can address this issue,and our's can be modified to reflect our decision herein. The general consensus on this issue, of whether the receiving member can freely exercise their choice if not dictated to by the offering member, is "it's up to your committee what they want to do". Corporation proxy votes operate both ways. Some control the choice of voting, and others do not. Our bylaws can state: 1. When giving their proxy vote to another member, such proxy vote may be limited to voting for the candidate choice of the offering member. 2. The offering member may opt to allow the receving member to exercise the proxy vote for the candidate of their choice. 3. If no election is designated by the offering member, the receiving member may exercise the proxy vote for the candidate of their choice. With elections approaching in September/October, we may want to have this issue clarified. Sincerel ; Sharon M. Hanlon