Loading...
EAC-SC Minutes 07/25/2012Minutes of 7 -25 -2012 Environmental Advisory Council sub - committee meeting. Meeting held in room 609 at the Horseshoe Drive location. 9 am to 11 am. Chris D'Arco, Steve Preston, Jeremy Franz, Andrew Dickman, David Bishof, Gary McNally, Gina Downs in attendance David Bishof stated that EAC sub - committee recommendations need to be brief. The recommendations should be presented to the planning commission by an EAC member. Would like to see the recommendations posted on the website and suggested the language be in layman terms. Some discussion ensued concerning the watershed management plan. The plan was 'accepted' by the board of county commissioners. Perhaps 'adoption' of the plan by the BCC would move the plan beyond the recommendation stage to the implementation stage. Steve Preston stated that the BCC accepted the plan as a technical document and the North Golden Gate flow way is being studied using criteria from the new watershed management plan. EAC members were concerned that the watershed management plan not be 'put on the shelf'. A lot of time and money went into developing the plan and the EAC would like assurances that it was not a wasted effort. Gary McNally recommended development of a schedule for implementing the watershed management plan. Would like to see it adopted in resolution form. It was suggested that the committee might pull specific items from the plan and promote their implementation. In essence, have the committee develop the timeline and not just suggest that one be developed. Andrew Dickman wondered if we needed a manual for the Low Impact Development criteria. He said if the LID principles are to move forward into the land development code, they should be organized in a manual first. Gary McNally suggested that the credits program for implementing LIDs be compared with credit programs for same in other Florida counties. He thought the demographics would be helpful. Discussion took place regarding what should or should not be included in spreadsheet format for county comparisons.