The URL can be used to link to this page

CAC Agenda 09/13/2012 Meeting Agenda and Notice COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 - 7:00 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS THIRD FLOOR, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES •Sunshine Law on Agenda Questions •2012 CAC MEETING DATES I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda V. Public Comments VI. Approval of CAC Minutes 1. August 9, 2012 VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report 2. FSBPA Conference on 9/26-28 Waldorf Astoria. Naples VIII. New Business 1. FEMA Deobligation Discussion 2. Local Management Funding Request (LGFR) to FDEP a. Collier County Beach Nourishment Project b. South Marco Island Beach Renourishment 3. Wiggins Pass Plans and Specification Proposal 4. Peer Review Wiggins Pass Straightening 5. Renourishment Options; Discussion and Recommendations Main Collier County Beaches IX. Old Business X. Announcements XI. Committee Member Discussion XII. Next Meeting Date/Location October 11, 2012 Government Center, 3rd Floor XIII. Adjournment All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board prior to the meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Gail D. Hambright at (239) 252-2966. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380. Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Anthony P. Pires, Jr.,Esq., Chairman Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee FROM: Colleen M. Greene, Assistant County Attorne)(Gh,1 DATE: March 18,2010 ��....�!_ ' RE: Sunshine Law and Agenda question The issue presented is whether the Sunshine Law requires that an agenda be made available prior to board meetings. In summary,the answer is no. The Sunshine Law Manual(2009 Ed. Vol. 31)provides the following: The Attorney General's Office recommends publication of an agenda, if available, in the notice of the meeting;. if an agenda is not available, subject matter summations might be used. However, the courts have held that the Sunshine Law does not mandate that an agency provide notice of each item to be discussed via a published agenda. Such a specific requirement has been rejected because it could effectively preclude access to meetings by members of the general public who wish to bring specific issues before a governmental body. See Hough v. Stembridge, 278 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). And see Yarbrough v. Young, 462 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (posted agenda unnecessary; public body not required to postpone meeting due to inaccurate press report which was not part of the public body's official notice efforts). Thus, the Sunshine Law has been interpreted to require notice of meetings, not of the individual items which may be considered at that meeting. However, other statutes, codes or ordinances may impose such a requirement and agencies subject to those provisions must follow them. Accordingly, the Sunshine Law does not require boards to consider only those matters on a published agenda. "[W]hether to impose a requirement that restricts every relevant commission or board from considering matters not on an agenda is a policy decision to be made by the legislature." Law and Information Services, Inc. v. City of Riviera Beach, 670 So. 2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Today's Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee was properly noticed in compliance with the Sunshine Law on or about February 1, 2010. Further, the agenda for today's meeting was also publically'noticed on the County's website on Monday, March 15, 2010. The related back-up materials for the agenda were supplemented and available on the County's website on Wednesday, March 17, 2010. In addition, a number of these materials also appeared on the agenda for the Coastal Advisory Committee meeting on Thursday, March 11, 2010. In my opinion, there is no violation of the Sunshine Law and no legal issue regarding the date the agenda was published. cc: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management o �rer County rty Public Services Division Coastal Zone Management TO: CAC Board Members FROM: Gail Hambright, Accountant DATE: December 1, 2011 SUBJECT: 2012 CAC Scheduled Meetings Please mark your calendar for the following 2011 CAC scheduled meeting dates: January 12, 2012 February 9, 2012 March 8,2012 April 12, 2012 May 10, 2012 June 14, 2012 July 12, 2012 August 9,2012 September 13, 2012 October 11, 2012 November 8, 2012 December 13, 2012 All meetings will be held in the Board of County Commissioner's chambers,third floor,Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, unless otherwise noted. A public notice will be sent out before each meeting. t :rµ Cofer County Coastal Zone Management•3299 Tathiami Trail East,Suite 103•Naples,Florida 34112-5746.239-252.2966•FAX 239-252-2950 www.colliergov.netfcoastalzonemanagement CAC September 13,2012 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 1 of 4 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, August 9, 2012 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: John Sorey, III VICE CHAIRMAN: Jim Burke (Excused) Anthony Pires (Excused) Robert Raymond (Excused) Joseph A. Moreland Victor Rios Wayne Waldack Linda Penniman (Vacancy) ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management Jeff Klatzkow, County Attorney Gail Hambright, Accountant Dr. Michael Bauer, City of Naples CAC September 13,2012 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 2 of 4 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations Department or view online. I. Call to Order Chairman Sorey called the meeting to order at 1:00 P.M. II. Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. III. Roll Call Roll call was taken and a quorum was established. Linda Penniman was welcomed as a new member of the Coastal Advisory Committee. Chairman Sorey acknowledged Randy Moity was present(he is waiting for the Board of County Commissioners to re-appoint him to the Committee). IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda Mr. Rios moved to approve the Agenda subject to the following addition: • Item IX.1 —Update on Wiggins and Doctors Pass projects Second by Mr. Moreland. Carried unanimously S—0. V. Public Comments None VI. Approval of CAC Minutes 1. June8,2012 Mr. Rios moved to approve the minutes of the June 8, 2012 Coastal Advisory Committee meeting as presented. Second by Mr. Waldack. Carried unanimously S-0. VII. Staff Reports 1. Expanded Revenue Report—Gary McAlpin The Committee reviewed the "Collier County Tourist Tax Revenue FY 12 Revenue Report" as reported through June 31, 2012. VIII. New Business 1. Beach Renourishment; Emergency Truck Haul; Options and Discussions Gary McAlpin presented"the Executive Summary"Review and Discuss Beach Renourishment and Emergency Truck Haul Options"dated August 9, 2012 for consideration. He reported there are currently two beach erosion"hot spots" in the County located adjacent to the La Playa to just north of the Ritz Carlton(R26—R30)and from Lowdermilk Park to Naples Golf and Beach Club(R61 —R633.5). The BCC has previously directed staff to develop a modified plan to move up the proposed FY13/14 renourishment to FY12/13. Upon investigation,the Biological Opinions required in the permit process preclude any renourishment other than a small scale truck haul project this year. CAC September 13,2012 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 3 of 4 In order to address the"hotspots," staff has developed two options for consideration: Option 1 Emergency truck haul sand to the hotspots in Vanderbilt Beach and Naples Beach immediately after turtle nesting season to be followed by a comprehensive renourishment in 2014. Option 2 Do nothing immediately,and continue with the 9/15/2013 to 6/1/2014 renourishment. Committee discussion occurred on the status of the major beach renourishment, ramifications of the required biological opinions, and the merits of the options outlined by Staff to address the"hot spots." Speakers Mick Moore, Vanderbilt Beach Resort Bob Krasowski John McGaunn,Ritz-Carlton Hotel Hunter Hansen,Waldorf Astoria Naples Mr. Rios moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners authorize an emergency beach renourishment project for the two areas outlined by staff, to be completed in the most timely and economically efficient manner. Second by Mr. Moreland. Carried unanimously 5—0. Chairman Sorey requested staff to communicate with representatives of the hotels/resorts affected by the erosion to ensure they understand the physical locations and related quantities of sand to be placed under the auspices of the project. Gary McAlpin reported the CAC will be holding a workshop immediately prior to their next regular meeting (September 13, 2012)to discuss the major beach renourishment options. The options will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners at their September 25, 2012 meeting for consideration. IX. Old Business 1. Update on Doctors and Wiggins Pass projects Wiggins Pass Gary McAlpin provided an update on the project noting the Florida Department of Environmental Protection is in receipt of all technical information required for the permits and is awaiting submittal of a"letter of consistency" from the County and the Delnor Wiggins State Park Use Agreement. Doctors Pass Gary McAlpin reported Tropical Storm Debby caused shoaling in the area of Doctors Pass. The areas affected have been marked with temporary buoys. The City CAC September 13,2012 VI-1 Approval of Minutes 4 of 4 of Naples and Moorings Bay Taxing District are taking the necessary steps to remove the sand. X. Announcements None XI. Committee Member Discussion None XII. Next Meeting Date/Location September 13,2012 6:00 p.m.—Government Center,Administration Bldg. F,3rd Floor There being no further business for the good of the County,the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 2:27 P.M. Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee John Sorey, III, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX REVENUE FY 12 TDC Revenue Report 31-Aug-2012 Budget FY 12(5%) FY 12 Adopted Reserved by FY 12 Net FY 12 Variance to FY Fund _ Budget Law Budget Forecast 12 Budget 183 2,153,300 (107,700) 2,045,600 2,368,600 215,300 184 3,262,500 (164,100) 3,098,400 3,588,800 326,300 193 310,900 (15,500) 295,400 342,000 31,100 194 1,516,100 (75,800) 1,440,300 1,667,700 151,600 195 4,371,800 (218,600) 4,153,200 4,809,000 437,200 196 0 - 0 0 0 198 1,435,500 (71,800) 1,363,700 1,579,100 143,600 Gross Budget $13,050,100 (653,500) $12,396,600 $14,355,200 $1,305,100 Less 5%Rev Res (653,500) Net Budget 12,396,600 Collections %Budget Collected to %over FY 11 %over FY 10 %over FY 09 Month Actual FY 12 Cum YTD Date collections collections collections Oct 525,334 525,334 4.026% 9.71% ' 18.07% 31.38% Nov 691,705 1,217,039 9.326% 10.65% 26.46% 11.70% Dec 924,729 2,141,768 16.412% 23.29% 24.11% 15.79% Jan 1,208,561 3,350,329 25.673% 19.69% 14.27% 7.17% Feb 1,907,069 5,257,398 40.287% 19.09% 13.61% 16.67% Mar 2,325,647 7,583,045 58.108% 14.78% 14.40% 17.73% Apr 2,787,652 10,370,697 79.469% 8.60% 15.86% 37.87% May 1,437,632 11,808,329 90.485% 5.96% 8.65% 16.90% June 934,544 12,742,873 97.647% 9.86% 18.35% 24.82% July 730,332 13,473,205 103.243% 7.44% 24.99% 25.91% Aug 778,252 14,251,457 109.207% 6.50% 16.27% 21.70% Sept 14,251,457 109.207% Total 14,251,457 14,251,457 12.43% 16.07% 21.03% Projected 14,355,200:' Bal to Collect 103,743 Budget Comparison 5 Yr Collect 5 Yr Collect Budgeted Actual Month over Month )forecast Month History-Cum History-Monthly Collections Collections Variance s Oct 3.4% 3.46 441513 525,334 83,821 '485,567 Nov 8.0% 4.6% 597,184 691,705 94,521 , 6�7 Dec 13.8% 5.9% 765,938 924,729 158,791 642,637, Jan 22.0% 82% 1,063,785 1,208,561 144,776 1,170,178 Feb 34.8% 12.8% 1,676,256 1,907,069 230,813 1,843,893 Mar 50.6% 15.8% 2,063,999 2,325,647 261,648 2,270,443 Apr 68.8% 18.2% 2,376,287 2,787552 411,365 20134982 May 792% 103% 1,348,215 1,437532 89,417 )'483045 f: June 85.3% 6.2% 804559 934544 129,985 021 .. July 90.46 5.0% 653,390 730,332 76,942 716,724 ., Aug 95.5% 5.2% 678,131 778252 100,121 745,948 Sept 100.0% 4.5% 580,844 0 n/a 638,932 . Total 100.0% 100.0% 13,050,100 14,251,457 1,782,201 14,356,200' 110.00% Tourist Tax Revenue Collection Curve i $3 0 [... .. _.. .... ........... ...... .... I c c '$ __ ...._...___. ---Budgeted si.s s -r.e.Actual $1.0 __ ._. ___.. _.._, ... --,-,'...Forecast , $0.0 _'' _.... _...... ___... .______.. '& o i o , LL i $ U , , 9/5201210'.29 AM H.\Revenue Report`Monthly Gras,Sales,and TX Receipts BED32ORD 09/04/2012 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX - /TD REPORT BY CITY PAGE 1 ** NAPLES ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 124889 171672 257204 310088 463661 581690 646118 359807 239314 156429 192882 3503754 ** MARCO ISLAND ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 742329 171194 201691 244744 391683 485677 628522 372070 226574 231338 221306 3317128 ** IMMOKALEE ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 528 489 863 1067 681 740 983 879 807 709 635 8381 ** EVERGLADES CITY ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 4057 5607 7144 9161 12338 17648 18666 9921 6879 4220 4310 99951 ** COLLIER COUNTY ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 253531 342743 457827 643501 1038706 1239892 1493363 694955 460970 337636 359119 7322243 ** OTHER ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS ** TOTALS ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN' JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 525334 691705 924729 1208561 1907069 2325647 2787652 1437632 934544 730332 778252 14251457 PED33ORD 09/04/2012 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX - YTD REPORT BY ACCOUNT TYPE PAGE 1 ** APARTMENT ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 896 435 1497 863 5735 6040 10405 4081 1847 1221 166 33186 ** CONDOMINIUM ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 39952 21515 35761 82154 118188 264235 531116 59412 47525 37085 14978 - 1251921 ** CAMPGROUND/RV/PARK ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 1892 3546 5271 11540 28012 27270 22208 7704 19524 2046 3239 132252 ** HOTEL/MOTEL ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 410547 599695 765114 796797 1113647 1478881 1662425 1202831 787911 585887 662575 10066310 ** INTERVAL ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 4990 7843 11914 14375 18080 18075 22054 23386 10833 11349 16720 159619 ** MOBILE HOME PARK ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 228 517 543 1455 1392 3710 4826 1441 466 126 156 14860 ** SINGLE FAMILY ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 45000 11899 21462 49877 28960 51324 151981 26449 21948 38055 14146 461101 ** REALTOR ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 21829 46255 83167 251500 593055 476112 382637 112328 44490 54563 66272 2132208 ** OTHER ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS ** TOTALS ** OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP TOTALS 525334 691705 924729 1208561 1907069 2325647 2787652 1437632 934544 730332 778252 14251457 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX APLE FISCALYEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER pECEMBEq !A[ ABY fEBRUARE f493Qj AEBIL MAY IUNE 1LY AUGUST SEREMBER YEARLY TOTALS 2005/2006 $76,843 $149,990 $236,963 $316,250 $512,938 $580,227 $570,569 $334,191 $217,611 $152,642 $175,256 $127,802 $3,451,282 2006/2007 $111,854 $151,746 $217,262 $291,277 $532,706 $589,595 $640,395 $340,926 $205,947 $156,476 $174,238 $145,286 $3,557,708 2007/2008 5122,094 5174,235 $231,470 $306,731 $564,747 $617,010 $664,907 $330,698 5233,938 $145,532 $172,641 5150,743 $3,714,746 2008/2009 $105,937 $154,246 $209,703 $298,657 5500,986 5528,321 $471,924 5327,310 $179,344 $133,913 $159,039 $120,786 $3,190,166 2009/2010 5102,425 5147,706 5202,271 $304,284 $473,406 $536,310 $578,659 $314,492 $192,256 $129,009 $150,982 $123,268 $3,255,068 2010/2011 $107,247 5144,923 $207,947 $296,553 $469,260 $537,127 $620,402 $342,016 $210,346 $150,143 $191,212 $144,535 $3,421,711 2011/2012 $124,889 $171,672 $257,204 $310,088 $463,661 $581,690 $646,118 $359,807 $239,314 $156,429 $192,882 $3,503,754 TOTAL: $751,289 $1,094,518 $1,562,820 $2,123,840 $3,517,704 $3,970,280 $4,192,974 $2,349,440 $1,478,756 $1,024,144 $1,216,250 $812,420 $24,094,435 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX MARCO ISLAND fISCALJEAR Q4TQQE8 NOVEMBER 9(CEMBER wain FEBRUARY maw AP86 M9Y LU,NE 15!12 AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEPRLYJOTALS 2005/2006 $71,763 $112,414 $147,512 $199,030 $344,074 $525,468 $576,530 $374,000 $261,791 $218,203 $208,955 $150,041 $3,189,781 2006/2007 $73,397 $88,576 $141,951 $189,026 $335,898 $517,149 $595,449 $379,673 $225,816 $216,858 $194,291 $183,007 $3,141,091 2007/2008 $165,745 $166,397 $93,819 $321,400 $408,079 $503,575 $666,564 $507,602 $140,088 $322,017 $245,721 $151,743 $3,692,750 2008/2009 $99,516 $168,129 $185,986 $280,663 $372,230 $457,015 $473,292 $324,558 $204,748 $183,654 $186,855 $210,702 $3,147,348 2009/2010 $124,837 $158,522 $168,816 $229,316 $364,347 $466,758 $550,969 $361,520 $197,005 $167,786 $223,954 $215,814 $3,229,644 2010/2011 $149,854 $169,786 $175,540 $198,803 $307,625 $416,029 $571,019 $363,648 $210,320 $192,412 $210,599 $230,248 $3,195,883 20/11/2012 $142,329 $171,194 $201,691 $244,744 $391,683 $485,677 $628,522 $372,070 $226,574 $231,338 $221,306 $3,317,128 TOTAL: $827,441 $1,035,018 $1,115,315 $1,662,982 $2,523,936 $3,371,671 $4,062,345 $2,683,071 $1,466,342 $1,532,268 $1,491,681 $1,141,555 $22,913,625 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX IMMOKALEE FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER away FEBRUARY mM$t1 81.BI$ 6781 !ll71 lkL1 AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLYIOTAIS 2005/2006 $842 $1,151 $1,306 $1,450 $1,683 $1,837 $2,050 $1,786 51,900 $1,774 $1,602 $1,372 $18,753 2006/2007 $1,306 $1,258 $1,837 $1,447 $2,307 $1,932 $1,982 $1,691 $1,466 $504 $786 $1,159 $17,675 2007/2008 $731 $746 $776 $966 $749 $828 $2,806 $1,501 $887 $650 $488 $530 $11,658 2008/2009 $410 $553 $686 $687 $808 $1,137 $952 $944 $618 $723 $671 $468 $8,657 2009/2010 $676 $624 $558 $754 $633 $912 $580 $596 $541 $965 $670 $663 $8,172 2010/2011 $625 $470 $639 $649 $649 $768 $928 $937 $440 $990 $517 $667 $8,279 2011/2012 $528 $489 $863 $1,067 $681 $740 $983 $879 $807 $709 $635 $8,381 TOTAL: $5,118 $5,291 $6,665 $7,020 $7,510 $8,154 $10,281 $8,334 $6,659 $6,315 $5,369 $4,859 $81,575 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX EVERGLADES CITY RSCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER ]ANUM$ FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL 516! LLNL 5.41 AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEAR(Y TOTA3 2005/2006 $2,246 $3,922 $4,783 $6,921 59,386 $15,217 $14,334 $13,423 $7,670 $3,754 $4,162 $3,331 $89,149 2006/2007 $4,678 $5,602 $5,705 $9,961 $12,884 $14,766 $16,860 $14,152 $8,653 $3,929 $4,101 $3,677 $104,968 2007/2008 $4,018 $5,424 $6,879 $9,724 $11,917 $16,032 515,800 $11,327 $11,881 $4,136 $4,136 $3,481 $104,755 2008/2009 $3,443 $4,975 $7,186 $8,987 $11,486 $15,137 $15,206 $10,315 $5,932 $3,302 $3,729 $3,447 $93,145 2009/2010 $3,783 $4,473 $5,706 $8,704 $12,423 $15,656 $18,852 $10,467 $6,149 $3,705 $4,019 $3,055 $96,992 2010/2011 $3,270 $5,011 $6,326 $7,626 $10,020 $13,210 $17,210 $10,847 $6,870 $4,054 $5,237 $5,113 $94,794 2011/2012 $4,057 55,607 $7,144 $9,161 $12,338 $17,648 $18,666 $9,921 $6,879 $4,220 $4,310 $99,951 TOTAL: $25,495 $35,014 $43,729 $61,084 $80,454 $107,666 $116,928 $80,452 $54,034 $27,100 $29,694 $22,104 $683,754 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX COLLIER COUNTY FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER mum fEBRUARY maw APRIL MU LUNE LAY AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLYTOTA3,1 2005/2006 $86,479 $255,807 $446,229 $534,560 $867,498 $1,119,215 $1,277,646 $777,494 $465,272 $357,870 $335,272 $262,452 $6,785,794 2006/2007 $245,217 $358,486 $492,296 $564,991 $952,204 $1,215,359 $1,354,022 $765,087 $465,420 $368,234 $336,767 $289,157 $7,407,240 2007/2008 $233,050 $342,484 $467,648 $602,044 $937,713 $1,172,727 $1,363,500 $726,065 $479,408 $332,957 $334,056 $280,120 $7,271,772 2008/2009 $190,563 $291,340 $395,097 $538,743 $749,012 $973,781 $1,060,618 $566,718 $358,045 $258,429 $289,170 $234,304 $5,905,820 2009/2010 $213,228 $235,663 $367,743 $514,622 $827,789 $1,013,235 $1,256,966 $636,092 $393,674 $282,867 $289,743 $235,133 $6,266,755 2010/2011 5217,861 5304,930 $359,617 $506,087 $813,768 $1,058,980 $1,357,406 $639,303 $422,707 $332,170 $323,179 $259,566 $6,595,574 2011/2012 $253,531 $342,743 $457,827 $643,501 $1,038,706 $1,239,892 $1,493,363 $694,955 $460,970 $337,636 $359,119 $7,322,243 TOTAL: $1,439,929 $2,131,453 $2,986,457 $3,904,548 $6,186,690 $7,793,189 $9,163,521 $4,805,714 $3,045,496 $2,270,163 $2,267,306 $1,560,732 $47,555,198 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX TOTALS NAPLES,MARCO ISLAND,IMMOKALEE,EVERGLADES CITY,COLLIER COUNTY EISGLYEAR =CLUB MIME 9ECEM8ER IESME81 £1880681 M6818 APRIL 8181 NNE NU &MEL =M82 Y LYT321635 2005/2006 $238,173 $523,284 $836,793 $1,058,211 $1,735,579 $2,241,964 $2,441,129 $1,500,894 $954,244 $734,243 $725,247 $544,998 $13,534,759 2005/2007 $436,452 $605,668 $859,051 $1,056,702 $1,835,999 $2,338,801 $2,608,708 $1,501,529 $907,302 $746,001 $710,183 $622,286 $14,228,682 2007/2008 $525,638 $689,286 $800,592 $1,240,865 $1,923,205 $2,310,172 $2,715577 $1,577,193 $866,202 $805,292 $757,042 $586,617 $14,795,681 2008/2009 $399,869 $619,243 $798,658 $1,127,737 $1,634,522 $1,975,391 $2,021,992 $1,229,845 $748,687 $580,021 $639,464 $569,707 $12,345,136 2009/2010 $444,949 $546,988 $745,094 $1,D57,680 $1,678,598 $2,D32,871 $2,406,026 $1,323,167 $789,625 $584,332 $669,368 $577,933 $12,856,631 2010/2011 $478,857 $625,120 $750,069 $1,009,718 $1,601,322 $2,026,114 $2,566,965 $1,356,751 $850,683 $679,769 $730,744 $640,129 $13,316,241 2011/2012 $525,334 $691,705 $924,729 $1,208,561 $1,907,069 $2,325,647 $2,787,652 $1,437,632 $934,544 $730,332 $778,252 $14,251,457 TOTAL: $3,049,272 $4,301,294 $5,714,986 $7,759,474 $12,316,294 $15,250,960 $17,546,049 $9,927,011 $6,051,287 $4,859,990 $5,010,300 $3,541,670 $95,328,587 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX APARTMENT FISCAL YEAR MOO NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY WO AVRIL 555$ NINE 55$ AUGUST 5$PTEMBER YEARLY TOTALS 2035/2006 $1,466 $198 $874 $1,987 $3,447 56,076 $10,463 $1,504 $4,446 $1,740 $179 $29 $32,409 2006/2037 $2,403 $320 $1,387 $2,519 $3,479 $4,476 $7,976 $1,601 $624 5692 $1,447 $284 $27,208 2007/2008 $296 $2,797 $964 $2,770 $6,901 $4,396 $5,539 $2,817 $587 $1,045 $176 $158 $28,446 2008/2009 5675 $111 $1,162 $1,700 $3,571 $4,192 $7,489 $1,210 $710 $349 $63 $41 $21,273 2009/2010 $367 $165 $947 52,776 $3,910 $4,729 $6,041 $2,607 $1,350 $799 $133 $150 $23,974 2010/2011 $1,113 $260 $1,018 $2,495 $4,802 $5,119 $4,555 $3,300 32,706 $879 $140 $133 $26,520 2011/2012 $896 $435 $1,497 $863 $5,735 $6,040 $10,405 $4,081 $1,847 $1,221 $166 $33,186 TOTAL: $7,216 $4,286 $7,849 $15,110 $31,845 $35,028 $52,468 $17,120 $12,270 $6,725 $2,304 $795 $193,016 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX CONDOMINIUM f,TSC6tYEAR QCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER IANUARY fEBRUART M6BSII Bf3IL M9$ IM11L MY AUGUS$ Hauswg YEARLYTOJA,S 2005/2006 $18,115 $9,286 $24,892 $46,267 $62,578 $172,726 $290,466 $55,985 $24,142 $17,905 $14,052 $10,670 $747,084 2006/2007 $17,081 $12,475 $21,751 $61,089 $79,540 $188,992 $323,240 $57,775 $23,138 $20,648 $14,595 $19,893 $840,217 2007/2008 $26,279 $14,948 $26,623 $60,871 $114,344 $203,054 $362,939 $60,403 $34,262 $19,440 $17,944 $15,076 $956,183 2008/2009 518,344 $13,399 $23,789 $52,809 $91,805 $192,617 $347,817 $58,346 523,642 $19,728 $12,954 $10,983 $866,233 2009/2010 519,477 514,463 $32,182 $63,689 $67,669 $240,487 $412,028 $65,444 $26,234 $23,042 $50,203 $55,623 $1,070,541 2010/2011 $84,551 $18,112 $30,208 $63,785 $91,669 $231,388 $462,079 $56,684 $32,886 $37,981 $18,278 $15,431 51,143,052 2011/2012 $39,952 $21,515 $35,761 $82,154 $118,188 $264,235 $531,116 $59,412 $47,525 $37,085 $14,978 $1,251,921 TOTAL: $223,799 $104,198 $195,206 $430,664 $625,793 $1,493,499 $2,729,685 $414,049 $211,829 $175,829 $143,004 $127,676 $6,875,231 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TA)( CAMPGROUND-RV-PARK NSCALYFAR QQQfi NOVEMBER DECEMBER MUM( FEBRUARY NAM APRIL 5j$ WA MI AUGUST $EPTEMBEK YEARLYTOTAI2 2005/2006 $2,009 $2,462 $6,622 $17,116 $21,543 $30,174 $33,024 $11,607 $5,331 $3,474 $3,313 $3,135 $139,810 2006/2007 $3,579 $4,746 $11,676 $11,640 $20,946 $27,551 $38,732 $9,843 $5,634 $2,542 $2,679 $2,917 $142,485 2007/2008 $2,813 $3,141 $5,568 $14,015 $22,010 $27,176 $32,516 $13,625 $3,740 $3,059 $2,716 $2,530 $132,909 2008/2009 $2,648 $3,212 $4,849 $13,465 $39,031 $26,499 $40,324 $8,261 $3,491 $2,910 $1,959 $1,859 $148,508 2009/2010 $2,494 $2,999 $5,825 $13,772 $21,117 $30,227 $41,973 $7,260 $3,551 $1,501 $3,616 $1,954 $136,289 2010/2011 $1,903 $3,102 $5,296 $14,095 $18,919 $25,457 $42,028 $7,013 $3,961 $1,735 $3,441 $2,802 $129,752 2011/2012 $1,892 $3,546 $5,271 $11,540 $28,012 $27,270 $22,208 $7,704 $19,524 $2,046 $3,239 $132,252 TOTAL: $17,338 $23,208 $45,107 $95,643 $171,578 $194,354 $250,805 $65,313 $45,232 $17,267 $20,963 $15,197 $962,005 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX HOTEL-MOTEL FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER mum FEBRUARY MARCR MIL BMX $MSL L41 AUGUST ;EPTEMBER YEARLYT9TAj$ 2005/2006 $284,057 $467,480 $720,774 $761,245 $1,112,751 $1,512,646 $1,716,480 $1,253,822 $855,707 $647,441 $626,697 $488,099 $10,447,199 2006/2007 $371,144 $531,060 $735,510 $744,056 $1,163,479 $1,582,476 $1,772,635 $1,282,854 $829,704 $641,921 $614,936 $533,317 $10,803,092 2007/2008 $450,926 $600,629 $663,134 $899,608 $1,210,928 $1,557,503 $1,811,406 $1,370,272 $738,197 $715,412 $647,247 $503,218 $11,168,480 2008/2009 $326,143 $547,238 $683,525 $804,914 $926,626 $1,244,914 $1,240,850 $1,012,168 $653,733 $484,556 $539,652 $482,466 $8,946,785 2009/2010 $367,978 5469,435 $611,459 $712,102 $1,010,110 $1,243,041 $1,434,996 $1,081,251 $698,121 $477,576 $532,222 $454,761 $9,093,052 2010/2011 $333,456 $555,623 $619,659 $684,174 $953,504 $1,315,029 $1,587,010 $1,132,637 $737,285 $567,319 $611,275 $569,446 $9,666,417 2011/2012 $410,547 $599,695 $765,114 $796,797 $1,113,647 $1,478,881 $1,662,425 $1,202,831 $787,911 $585,887 $662,575 $10,066,310 TOTAL: $2,544,251 $3,771,160 $4,799,175 $5,402,896 $7,491,045 $9,934,490 $11,225,802 $8,335,835 $5,300,658 $4,120,112 $4,234,604 $3,031,307 $70,191,335 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX INTERVAL FISCAL YEAR mom NOVEMBER DECEMBER IANUARY FEBRUARY A1AML11 APRIL MAX ISNE $5,$ AUGUST $EVTEMBER YEARLY TOWS 2005/2006 $865 $2,254 $3,617 $4,037 $7,099 $8,669 $15,490 $9,765 $8,182 $4,710 $7,116 $5,100 $76,904 2036/2007 $2,028 $3,691 $9,886 $10,092 $19,130 $24,221 $26,340 $17,397 $9,043 $6,290 $12,221 $6,099 $146,438 2007/2008 $6,597 $7,295 $10,353 $10,716 $20,438 $19,074 $20,960 $13,613 $7,614 $7,215 $7,767 $6,333 $137,975 2008/2009 $4,897 $5,623 $7,807 $10,438 $14,909 $13,650 $20,868 $21,687 $10,080 $11,449 $13,356 $13,307 $148,071 2009/2010 $10,156 $9,509 $13,274 $20,198 $17,462 $28,801 $34,980 $31,383 $12,115 $19,999 $15,197 $9,839 $222,913 2010/2011 $7,444 $5,816 $13,426 $18,029 $17,347 $22,275 $27,152 $28,303 $16,540 $6,406 $14,542 $9,450 $186,730 2011/2012 $4,990 $7,843 $11,914 $14,375 $18,080 $18,075 $22,054 $23,386 $10,833 $11,349 $16,720 $159,619 TOTAL: $36,977 $42,031 $70,277 $87,885 $114,465 $134,765 $167,844 $145,534 $74,407 $67,418 $86,919 $50,128 $1,078,650 1 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX MOBILE HOME PARK f1SCALYEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER ;ANUARY fEBRUART MR = APRIL MU 0151 WM AUGUST SEPTEMBER YEARLITOTall 2005/2006 $26 $312 $554 $517 $129 $779 $2,399 $45 $51 $89 $14 $2 $4,917 2006/2007 $3,093 $4132 $203 $620 $1,110 $2,831 $2,017 $700 $828 $133 $160 $170 $12,347 2007/2008 $172 $288 $768 $1,444 $3,492 $1,941 $4,349 $557 $218 $461 $348 $450 $14,488 2008/2009 $43 $162 $1,057 $1,229 $1,982 $3,139 $4,012 $1,175 $702 $278 $249 $194 $14,172 2009/2010 $438 $746 $974 $1,688 $2,479 $1,940 $5,061 $2,170 $911 $516 $292 $464 $17,679 2010/2011 $352 $705 $1,477 $2,940 $3,895 $4,309 $5,743 $1,692 $879 $312 $266 $257 $22,827 2011/2012 $228 $517 $543 $1,455 $1,392 $3,710 $4,826 $1,441 $466 $126 $156 $14,860 TOTAL: $4,352 $3,212 $5,576 $9,893 $14,479 $18,649 $28,407 $7,780 $4,055 $1,865 $1,485 $1,537 $101,290 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX SINGLE FAMILY FISCAL YEAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 1ANUARY FEBRUARY MASH APRIL MY 0MNE 5515,5 AUGUST ;MEMBER YEARLY TOTALS 2005/2006 $9,710 $3,439 $4,409 $18,100 $17,773 $24,067 $52,042 $15,400 $5,945 59,955 $6,729 $3,319 $170,888 2006/2007 $13,559 $4,549 $6,049 $20,838 $14,666 $23,955 $67,207 $13,573 $6,254 $16,936 $7,301 $8,453 $203,340 2007/2008 $17,673 $7,136 $12,482 $27,895 $15,617 $22,793 $82,815 $18,577 $11,121 $19,502 $8,797 $10,929 $255,337 2008/2009 $17,263 $11,147 $10,098 $33,205 $16,416 $33,371 $97,716 519,903 $11,470 $23,375 $12,173 $9,587 $295,724 2009/2010 $24,226 57,933 $12,349 $33,206 $16,749 $41,749 $113,111 $20,584 59,537 $23,926 $12,516 $17,674 $333,560 2010/2011 $31,981 $9,989 $12,618 $39,011 $20,626 $40,342 $126,367 $27,892 512,448 528,622 520,527 59,345 $379,768 2011/2011 545,000 $11,899 $21,462 549,877 528,960 551,324 5151,981 $26,449 $21,948 $38,055 $14,146 $461,101 TOTAL: $159,412 $56,092 $79,467 $222,132 $130,807 $237,601 $691,239 $142,378 $78,723 $160,371 $82,189 $59,307 $2,099,718 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX REALTOR RSGYFAR OCTOBER NOVEMBER pECEMBER /ANI53I FEBRUARY mem Mil MAX LUNE LACY 8L652$I ;MEMBER YEARLYT9TALS 2005/2006 $21,925 $37,853 $75,051 $208,942 $510,259 $486,827 $320,765 $152,766 $50,440 $48,929 $67,147 $34,644 $2,015,548 2006/2007 $23,565 $48,345 $72,589 $205,848 $533,649 $484,299 $370,561 $117,786 $32,077 $56,839 $56,844 $51,153 $2,053,555 2007/2008 $20,882 $53,052 580,700 $223,546 $529,475 $474,235 $393,053 $97,329 $70,463 $39,158 $72,047 $47,923 $2,101,863 2008/2009 $29,856 $38,351 $66,371 $209,977 $540,182 $457,009 $262,916 $107,095 $44,859 $37,426 $59,058 $51,270 $1,904,370 2009/2010 $19,813 $41,738 $68,084 $210,249 $539,102 $441,771 $357,570 $112,468 $37,806 $36,973 $55,189 $37,468 $1,958,231 2010/2011 $18,057 $31,513 $66,367 $185,189 $490,560 $382,195 $312,031 $99,230 $43,978 $36,515 $62,275 $33,265 $1,761,175 2011/2012 $21,829 $46,255 $83,167 $251,500 $593,055 $476,112 $382,637 $112,328 $44,490 $54,563 $66,272 $2,132,208 TOTAL: $155,927 $297,107 $512,329 $1,495,251 $3,736,282 $3,202,448 $2,399,533 $799,002 $324,113 $310,403 $438,832 $255,723 $13,926,950 COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX TOTALS APARTMENTS,CONDOMINIUM,CAMPGROUD/RV/PARK,HOTEL/MOTEL INTERVAL MOBILE HOME PARK,SINGLE FAILY,REALTOR FSCALYEAR QQ288 NOVEMBER 7ECEMBER mom fEBRUARY 5588555 APRIL M81 889E 085 AUGUST ;EPTEMBER YEARLYTQTA5,S 2005/2006 538,173 5523,284 5836,793 51,058,211 $1,735,579 52,241,964 $2,441,129 51,500,894 $954,244 5734,243 $725,247 $544,998 $13,334,759 2006/2007 $436,452 $605,668 $859,051 51,056,702 51,835,999 $2,338,801 $2,608,708 $1,501,529 5907,302 $746,001 $710,183 5622,286 $14,228,682 2007/2008 $525,638 $689,286 $800,592 $1,240,865 $1,923,205 52,310,172 $2,713,577 $1,577,193 $866,202 $805,292 $757,042 $586,617 $14,795,681 2008/2009 $399,869 $619,243 5798,658 $1,127,737 $1,634,522 $1,975,391 $2,021,992 51,229,845 5748,687 $580,021 $639,464 $569,707 $12,345,136 2009/2010 5444,949 5546,988 $745,094 $1,057,680 $1,678,598 $2,032,871 52,406,026 $1,323,167 $789,625 $584,332 $669,368 $577,933 $12,856,631 2010/2011 $478,857 $625,120 $750,069 $1,009,718 $1,601,322 $2,026,114 $2,566,965 $1,356,751 $850,683 $679,769 $734,744 $640,129 $13,316,241 2011/2012 5525,334 5691,705 5924,729 $1,208,561 51,907,069 52,325,617 $2,787,652 $1,437,632 $934,544 $730,332 $778,252 $14,251,457 TOTAL: $2,849,272 $4,301,294 $5,714,986 $7,759,474 $12,316,294 $15,250,960 $17,546,049 $9,927,011 $6,051,287 $4,859,990 $5,010,300 $3,541,670 $95,128,587 A :. ': FLORIDA SHORE & BEACH kik.4: PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION w' ,S. .,,,,,kk,...,,„:„„ „..„4„..,........ i i11 ‘,,,,,ti:-..-,,,,,,,,:,,,...;:::,,,..�.nF "�'�. K 1 r �I:. •'C .»1«tiif'• '"��%::':' nJ ,; -�.` s N r{. ri. `<i 4,, i. Div .''y:" •."x. . 4 iI»_ ? t .'. i;� -,P"< .. '.3.. bra�t,. _..� , L" Y: .'?4�ti ...f k F«: , h � . Conference n n ur j...: « ...£.:`I -...K.s . .r..--♦.; r '.p...: -f xiE 41'.. r.',,' ♦'i?'.:.; .S'r t. •,"'•:R: ?w N >r .. .'' . g W{a'.i I --H. '+'i:4t{}�k.. ° . " rte•. 4c' 1 ,� �. i.,�.',..'..`:xK .,,.4� .. }IA � at. r4. ::fir ((( '4' '' '' ,1.,Fi <!:„.:-!-...‘..:;,,,,,;;;;:. ;.' .�.i•. f:�Y ',_ wj- ^;ir s,s it'd .' 4 :"�;"> "'OW. .='•-='. ' ,: i°f• :i Y' , s, ••''.4,,,14' :'r.1%.,r"v ,,„-,,,,,,,,„,,,,,...1.,...c.,....., 9Y., . , ...,vv,'•y r ...,•,... w -:.4 ..{'.j •„1.'.' i0„ F ,i'i'.} 1: ,. .i7!«4',∎ 4' - 'S, ✓. - •Y.- i w, :3'l.,:t: ik •?• .^w s' s.:.' A".!K., i?!1 fir. ..,.;' ~•a •' "«:�..r':: "".".�. W n�i�":�:”: s rr,�' k.w'i't1r'>""�a q'.S r>»v..♦<i "•f •=.�.r•�s: 1,..'.: ,x,�.. "i.. ��S�y'y...t`r. •'• a..ix4 s.; ;:r• .c�x -'I ss.:':4',.......44-.,..5.......y.,......,......: �. .♦3rw., ` .s v� .�y:..:R: ♦. �5r�t L :f:Yxx 'f•. .� ^ ,. .!. .1:A..,,,...• P .!� r .».N•, ed; !:11°-;.:. = '" ";' ...:«'YC ,:. .t,.' ;s3"?vti�: + . •Pg; ,,,,, ••rz .•z <, as:i' *,,,us_. u ','.,.,. - 1 r,..:. a.. ...r.1s .nom. ,0:,,. .1. 1 H - �'i 4:. '., ,:.. a.°.:.' 1 :S�` `k!' •( k t^ ;�' : s r;may::t �:CA::" ..:.... a.. , .,, .� x:, ,�� •:�� :�'•�'� u, A ._.Y`� .......�.::��';y:._.y..::.S•.;1....:yy;'::'£^r v#Sit ran�.. }:� ; .a •:�wy�:�:�� '?:i�'"°. ;•2�i�:Y C`x-+T'�� !^e� �a }: ♦ �.,iY 7:. ham.; '...A ._ :,Z04$41- .. i? •aY.. ..:.�. � .y.'�Yi.•.<. : ......e:�.!'i �r 4:i:E ..::f::: w•.i':':."� �:. , is•.Y•:...... 1 K.. ..x..:. S'+ •.: .}'3• ., .�,W I' j��Sa; 7' �y .A' aY:,.rF �r' s< 1 - t _ - • • • .. ri‘:: . '''' ..A '. , ife: ::::. i.I'lifi 1,, ,' tfro, ., • ,; 5' CC, _ y tit's r1 �3syl may. ;ors:.. ' .vot.‘ ip�• i:k. � „ � s � 5S £ , 31 y • x y4j ►' . :• r Septembt Y . .. yy. . .„ Lida Ixt +f ft's fd, Y;Of 1,.�? 1orida`,,t?tr, 'Y".d ` "• 4 Na a A sa Naples Pier ..,, . , . - ,,, , ,1,, ! ---- ,.- ` ` ` '�;♦Pho o courtesy of Coastal Engineering Consultants r �, ' . CONFERENCE PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 26, 2012 • Welcome by Mayor John Sorey,City of Naples,and Chairman •Changing Roles,Options and Alternatives for Managing and Fred Coyle,Collier County Board of County Commissioners Funding Florida's Shallow-Draft Inlets: A Focus on St.Lucie Inlet Commissioner Doug Smith,Martin County Board of County • Collier County:Comprehensive Beach Management Commissioners • Gene Rauch,Town Manager,Town of Jupiter Achievements Over the Past Decade Island • Jerry Scarborough,Chief,Water Resources Branch, J.Gary McAlpin,Coastal Zone Management Director,Collier Jacksonville District,U.S.Army Corps of Engineers• Mark Crosley, County and Stephen Keehn,Senior Coastal Engineer,Coastal Assistant Executive Director,Florida Inland Navigation District • Planning&Engineering,Inc. Don Donaldson,Chair of FSBPA and County Engineer,Martin County • Collier County Tourism and the Value of Beaches •A Comparative Assessment of Florida's Beach Management Jack Wirt,Executive Director,Naples,Marco Island,Everglades Efforts Convention&Visitors Bureau Tom Campbell,President,Coastal Planning&Engineering,Inc. • Nourishing Florida's Eroding Beaches: Should We Keep •Regional Sand Source Management: The Purpose and Status Doing This? 1,4 of the Southeast Florida Sediment Assessment and Needs Michael Walther,President,Coastal Technology Corporation Determination(SAND)Study Colonel Alan Dodd,District Engineer,Jacksonville District,U.S. • What a Difference a Year Makes: 2012 Legislative Reform Army Corps of Engineers•Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson, of the Permitting Process for Beach and Inlet Projects St.Lucie Board of County Commissioners • Jeff Littlejohn, Representative Jim Frishe,District 54,Pinellas County • Kevin Deputy Secretary,Regulatory Programs,Florida Department of Bodge,Senior Vice-President,Olsen Associates,Inc. • Danielle Environmental Protection •Gretchen Harkins,Assistant to the Fondren,Chief,Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems,Florida County Administrator,Broward County• Jacqueline J.Keiser,Chief, Department of Environmental Protection • Diana Ferguson, Coastal/Navigation Section,Jacksonville District,U.S.Army Corps of Rutledge,Ecenia&Purnell,P.A.,and Legislative Services,FSBPA Engineers • Fireside Chat Series: A Bucket List of Policy,Funding,and FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2012 Permitting"Reform"Recommendations to Insure the Future Sustainability of Florida's Beach Management Program • Federal Funding and Processes in Changing Times A Roundtable Discussion with Florida's Senior Coastal Colonel Alan Dodd,District Engineer,Jacksonville District,U.S.Army Statesmen including Tom Campbell • Erik Olsen • Michael Corps of Engineers Stephen • Michael Walther • Florida Tourism Sets Record in 2011 and Beaches Played an • Honeymoon Island: Restoring the Beach at Florida's Most Important Role Visited State Park Tony Lapi,Chairman of the Board of VisitFlorida and CEO'Tween Brett Moore,Humiston&Moore Engineers and Andy Squires, Waters Inn,Captiva Coastal Manager,Pinellas County • Indian River County Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration • 35 Years of Beach Management on Marco Island Project-Summary and Perspectives Using an Upland Sand Michael Poff,Vice-President,Coastal Engineering Consultants Source James Gray,Coastal Engineer,Indian River County•Tem Fontaine, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 Senior Engineer,Coastal Technology Corporation • Hillsboro Beach:Renourishment Lessons Learned • Solutions for Chronic Erosion Implemented Along Sections of Tim Blankenship,Director,Coastal Systems International,Inc. Collier County's Shoreline Since 1997,15 Years and Counting Bill Hanson,Vice President and Lynn Nietfeld,Project Sponsor, Brett Moore and Kenneth Humiston,Humiston&Moore Engineers Great Lakes Dredge&Dock • Local Funding Case Studies:Factors Leading to Framework, • Beach and Navigation Synergy Implementation and Success Jacqueline J.Keiser,Chief,Coastal/Navigation Section, Jimmy Sellers,Coastal Management Specialist,Coastal Technology Jacksonville District,U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Corporation • William B.Stronge,President,Stronge Consulting,Inc. • • Port Everglades: Sand Management at a Major Urban Port The Timing of Project Funding Requests: How to Improve Eric Myers,Natural Resources Administrator,Broward County• Coordination between Federal,State,and Local Partners- Christopher Creed,Vice-President,Olsen Associates,Inc. Asking,Needing and Using Dan Haubner,Programs Section Chief,Jacksonville District,U.S. • Wiggins Pass:An Inlet Management Study Army Corps of Engineers•Danielle Fondren,Chief,Bureau of Stephen Keehn,Senior Coastal Engineer,Coastal Planning& Beaches and Coastal Systems,Florida Department of Environmental Engineering,Inc. Protection • Thomas Pierro,Senior Coastal Engineer,Coastal Planning&Engineering • Virginia Barker,Watershed Program Manager,Brevard County • Lisa Armbruster,Director of Governmental Affairs,FSBPA Subject to change,actual program with specific times will be available online. THIS YEAR'S CONFERENCE CONFERENCE REGISTRATION Coming off an outstanding year for Florida's beaches Early Registration Regular Registration in terms of a significant increase in state project Through September 5,2012 After September 5,2012 funding for FY 2012-13,and passage by the Legislature Member Registration $325 Member Registration $375 of a permitting reform package initiated by FSBPA, Non-Member Registration $375 Non-Member Registration $425 there will be ample opportunity to celebrate at this *Spouses $125 *Spouses $125 year's conference. We anticipate some very special **Full Time Students $125 **Full Time Students $125 award winners, and have invited Governor Scott to acknowledge and express the appreciation of FSBPA and *Spouse registration fee includes Welcome Reception and Awards Banquet its coastal government communities for his support of **Students must provide current student ID the state's beach management program and his specific recognition of beaches as"amazing resources:' Yet,the major focus of the 2012 program will continue to be on issues and concerns that may impact the THREE WAYS TO REGISTER sustainability of Florida's beach program in the future. We hope this conference has found the proper balance -important discussion and a good time! ONLINE: www.fsbpa.com/annual.htm Additional conference announcements will be made FAX: 850-201-6782 on-line and in e-mail blasts. For Thursday afternoon, MAIL: FSBPA,PO Box 13146,Tallahassee,FL 32317 September 27, we are planning a DEP Q&A Session To fax or mail,download the registration form from the link above led by Danielle Fondren, Chief, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems,with the dredging industry,and coastal FOR MORE INFORMATION engineering and other professional interests,as well as a boattrip focusing onWiggins Pass and inlet management. Contact,Teri Besse,Conference Manager Further details on both will be forthcoming. 850-906-9227 or teri @fsbpa.com CANCELLATION POLICY September 26,2012 POLICY Cancellation Fee:$50 10:00 a.m.to 11:00 a.m. FSBPA must receive cancellation requests in writing,by email or Beaches 101:An Introduction to How Beaches Work regular mail,no later than September 17,2012.Send requests Kevin Bodge,Ph.D., P.E.,Olsen Associates, Inc. to FSBPA Cancellations,PO Box 13146,Tallahassee,FL 32317 or mail @fsbpa.com HOTEL RESERVATIONS Waldorf Astoria Naples Room Rates: $139* single/double plus taxes 475 Seagate Drive For reservations online,visit www.fsbpa.com/hotel.html Naples, FL 34103 For reservations by phone,call 1.888.722.1270 or 239.597.3232 TO RECEIVE THE GROUP RATE,MENTION FSBPA *the hotel has waived the resort fee.There will be complimentary self parking and valet �.; f eg parking will be offered at a discounted rate of$12.00 per day.Complimentary internet access �_ will be provided in guest rooms. Mli! , (, °� To ensure that a room is available,reservations should be made by - ' September 5,2012. After this date,rooms may not be available. Old ar Most major credit cards are accepted. All reservations must be accompanied by a first night room deposit,or guaranteed with a major credit card. A one-night cancellation fee will be charged for cancellations made less than seven(7)days prior to arrival. Check in:4:00 p.m. I Check out: 12 noon t.---...,\ FSBPA NONPROFIT ORG. PO Box 13146 US POSTAGE PAID Tallahassee, FL 32317 Tallahassee FL www.fsbpa.com PERMIT#871 WHO SHOULD ATTEND? Members of the Legislature and Committee or Member Staff State Environmental Resource Protection Agencies City and County Commissioners City and County Environmental Resource Managers and Beach Management Coordinators Tourist Development Councils and Convention&Visitors Bureaus Coastal Engineers and Coastal Industry Interests U.S.Army Corps of Engineers , : c r I Inlet Districts and other Special Interest Districts Other General Government and Coastal/Ocean Association 4 *, A r .. 1 , Environmental Groups and Alliances >' • -•'. �" a Coastal Geologists and.Biologists_: __ti , • ° .4: ;:' '"''' `- `7 : r Community Associations and • n Be ch l vitor , . , ``: _°,,� 1:14-4-ai-- , a ti ,. , , Coastal Residen nd other In=-4 ' $'c itizen ::1{ E (HIaJTRSLSPONSORS _ „.... , — . . ... ,„7., s ' The�F aP nnual.Conference o" ° :.en R g os � B -n m M,e ,��::� r � �_ wets.°for detailed in form ti i • se con act Teri Meager FSBPA,850-906-9227 or teri @fsb i.com , ... M , Lowdermilc Parkin Naples " � . , Photo courtesy of Coastal Planning&Engineering ,,``. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 1 of 14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to direct the County Manager to pursue the recovery of de-obligated Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) payments from Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma and authorize expenditures up to $100,000 for technical, legal and professional resources to support the recovery effort. OBJECTIVE: Request that the Board of County Commissioners direct the County Manager to pursue the recovery of de-obligated FEMA payments from Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma and provide up to $100,000 in initial funding for technical, legal and professional resources to support the recovery effort. CONSIDERATIONS: On November 16, 2011, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) instituted a "Disallowed Cost Initiative" program aimed at recouping reimbursements made by the Agency to grantees from previous funded disasters. On June 26, 2012, the FEMA Region IV Office located in Atlanta de-obligated $11,116,689.17 from the Florida Department of Emergency Management (FDEM) as a result of reevaluating previously approved and paid reimbursements from Hurricanes Katrina and Wilma. Also associated with this de-obligation were administrative fees of $55,583.45 bringing the total de-obligated amount to $11,172,272.62. Subsequently, on July 23, 2012 FDEM invoiced Collier County the amount of $11,172,272.62 for the reimbursement of these de-obligated funds. Mr. Craig Fugate was the Director of FDEM and ultimately approved/authorized Collier County reimbursement payments for these federally declared disasters. Mr. Fugate is now the FEMA Director and responsible for the implementation of the program that de-obligated Collier County funding. Collier County is not alone in this situation. Based on recent correspondence, it appears that FEMA has de-obligated at least $87,000,000 from 11 municipalities and/or state organizations. A partial lists of these organizations include the City of Ft. Lauderdale, Hillsborough County, the City of Deerfield Beach, the City of Vero Beach, the Department of Juvenile Justice, South Florida Water Management District, the City of Miramar, the City of Coral Springs and the City of Hollywood. This is a national FEMA issue affecting localities throughout the country. Collier County took all direction and guidance directly from FDEM relative to the submission of reimbursement requests. The due diligence by the FDEM and FEMA was extensive. Both the State and FEMA spent over a month reviewing Collier County's funding requests. In all cases, the work and payments were approved by MEM at the Lake Mary-Florida Recovery Office and FDEM-Tallahassee. FEMA officially approved our work and payments three times; once in the Florida Recovery Office in Lake Mary; once at region Headquarters in Atlanta and once at FEMA Headquarters in Washington, DC. All approvals by both FDEM and FEMA were performed by authorized individuals with clearance to make these funding decisions. Relative to Collier County, the Lead Deputy Public Assistance Officer from FDEM states in a August 23, 2012 email, "The bottom line to all of what has occurred is that neither the State or CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 2 of 14 Collier have made any mistakes in the application of 44 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) programmatic issues. Also, the cost numbers, which are all substantiated with historical cost documentation, were included in the Project Worksheet package provided electronically to FEMA. All of the damages documented were eligible per the Public Assistance Regulations in 44CFR according to FEMA Management. At the risk of being redundant, the cost numbers were complete and accurate and the PA Program regulations were correctly applied at the time of entry into the National Emergency Management Information System (NEMIS)." These expenditures represent work that was required to maintain the integrity of our beaches. Collier County would have been required to perform this work regardless if reimbursement was received from FEMA. FISCAL IMPACT: The immediate objective is to obtain authorization for the expenditure of $100,000 to support the recovery effort. Funds will be provided from TDC Category A — Fund (195)reserves. Fund (195) reserves total $25,438,178. A budget amendment will be required. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There are no Growth Management Impacts from this action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, requires majority vote, and is legally sufficient for Board action.—CMG RECOMMENDATION: That the Board Of County Commissioners authorize the County Manager to take the following actions: 1. Retain the services of James Lee Witt, a nationally recognized firm specializing in FEMA related issues to consult and lobby on the Board's behalf. 2. Continue to retain the services Mr. Bruce French of the York Corporation to provide technical consulting on FEMA and FDEP rules, policies and regulations. 3. Develop and implement a federal representative lobbying plan through the Ferguson Group supporting our recovery efforts. 4. Draft a letter to the governor for the Chairman's signature asking for his support and FDEM's assistance in our recovery efforts. 5. Work with the County Attorney's Office to review legal remedies. 6. Expend up to $100,000 for professional support services to accomplish the above recommendations and approve required budget amendments. Prepared by: Gary McAlpin, Growth Management Division—Department of Natural Resources CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 3 of 14 C 5. Dcpa rtvne u1 trf)iorteei!ted Security Wastingt n.DC 2052$ • * FEMA 1r 2011 MEMORANDUM FOR: Regional Administrators J FROM: Norman Deng' � Chief Financial Officer SUBJECT: FEMA Disallowed Cost Initiative As discussed,in the Regional Administrator's meeting in Austin,TX,October 4,2011,the Office of the Chief Financial Officer(OCFO)is beginning to pursue open audit findings associated with disallowed costs and will need assistance neon.your office, The attached spreadsheet includes all open recommendations for your region that tie to the"Aging 010 Finding"report that was presented at the meeting. Because the regions are continually working 010 findings,°CFO wants to ensure that we are working from the latest status on the listed audits. Below outlines the process that OCFO will follow: 1) On the attached spreadsheet in the top left area,please provide the name of a Regional primary POC and their contact information,along with an alternate(s)POC,if you have one. The POC designated will need to have the authority to coordinate the OCFO Audit Resolution deliverables for all grants including Grants Program Directorate,Recovery, Response,National Preparedness Directorate and Mitigation Grants, 2) To validate the status of the audit: a) Review the information for each audit and in the current status column(0)of the spreadsheet Indicate if you concur,non-concur or if finding has been closed, Below are the definitions of these status' to assist you, i) Concur-=Your office agrees with the disallowed cost ii) Non-Concur—Your office has received additional information that would cause your office to reconsider the disallowed cost iii) Closed—Your office has worked this finding and subsequently closed it 3) Documentation to be provided to OCFO as finding reviews are completed: a) For the Concur items,your office needs to provide copies of any OIG correspondence,grant paperwork that applies to the audit,and any additional information and documentation that supports resolving the findings. b) For the Non-Concur in addition to the above noted documents and also provide an explanation of why you are now non-concurring with the recommendation. 4) If the Audit finding is closed,please provide the actual amount recouped in the recouped amount column(P)of the spreadsheet.Enter the date it was closed in the date of closure column(Q)and how it was recouped(De-obligation,repayment,allowable,etc.)in the method of recoupment column(It). Documentation must be provided in order to send evidence to the 010 and to have them officially close as we 1, CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business • 4 of 14 I Please complete the reviews by 12/02/2011 and forward the completed spreadsheet and any documentation-to Kathy Hill.OCFO/Risk Management and Compliance at Kathy,hi1l, fema.dhs.eov. You may submit the spreadsheet as you complete the reviews. As concur responses are received,°CFO will be mailing a notification letter(an example is attached)to the grantee providing them 30 days to send any additional information pertaining to the disallowed cost. if grantees do not provide any additional information,()CFO will complete the necessary paperwork for debt collection(this is the reason we are asking for copies of documents)and forward to the FEMA Finance Center. If additional paperwork is received, OCFO will contact the POC for your region and work • collaboratively with the grantee to adjudicate the disallowed cost within 7 days of receiving the documents. If determined any of the disallowed cost remains unsupported,OCFO will forward the paperwork to FEMA Finance Center for billing- If it is determined that this additional documentation justifies any of the disallowed cost,°CFO will provide necessary memo and documentation to the FDA 01G/GAO liaison office requesting closure from the 0113. In order to provide background and clarification to your POCs,attached is a GAOKHQ Open Recomn ectdation Analysis that was completed January 2010,which identified what the common causes are for the disallowed costs and a copy of the briefing deck from the Regional Administrators meeting. OCFO is also responsible for ensuring timely responses to FEMA's A-I33 futdings. OCFO will begin to provide monthly status reports at the leadership meeting on each regions status. OCFO will start sharing with you the status report the 2id and 4th Friday of each month to provide you the opportunity to ensure that your region is In compliance with the Management Decision Letter timeline of 180 days from the date it is entered into Federal Audit Clearing House(FAC)system. Reporting on process and responses will begin Tuesday,December 06,2011,at the Senior Leadership meeting. Any questions please feel tree to contact Kathy Hill,Director Risk Management Sr.Compliance,on '202-645-7057 or ata .y. i4t fc.ine...dlts,gov- cc: Administrator Deputy Administrator Deputy Administrator for Protection and National Preparedness Associate Administrators Acting U.S.Fire Administrator Chief of Staff Assistant Administrators Acting Assistant Administrators . Chief Counsel Office Directors Attachment(s): Regional audit spreadsheet 0I0/GAO Recommendations Analysis,January 2010 OCFO briefing presentation Grantee notification letter A-133 status report as of 10/31/2011 • Page 2 of 2 CAC September 13,2012 • VIII-1 New Business 5 of 14 OIG Region IV Disallowed Cost Analysis • April 24 2012 016 Adjusted FRO Final Total FllgIble$per Current EligI6fe$ Final inspection Original Total Findings Deduction Inspection$ FRO Final w/Inpect of DIG Inspection Completion FRO Labor& Subgrantee OR S PV## Eligible Amount Total Adjustment Inspection Adjusted$ Begin Date Data Expense Cost Est. Fort Lauderdale,Lltyol 1609 2932 $23,532,420.60 ••$10,325,949.00 511,335,878.51 $34,868,299.11 57.4,.542,350.11 6/30/2009 12/18/2009 581,765.00 . Fort Lauderdale,City of .1602 695 53,934,705.04 -$3,902,864.00 $3,634,862.25 $7,549,067.29 $3,646,183.29 1/21/2011 _ 4/18/2011 $40,882.50 Fort Lauderdale,CO of 1602 741&743 5130,000,00 -$665,267.00 5809,100.91 5809,100.91 $143,833.91 4/12/2011: 10/13!2011 $8176500 Closeout labor Cost Negated by DIG?Findings $204,412.50.. . l4iliborough County • 1561 2399 5644,702.85 •$182,289.00 $192,076.90 5666,177.95 $483,838.95 1101bcre,j h County 1561 2390 54,285,065.62 4749,263.00 5149,263.W 54,185,665.62 $4,135.802.62 DeerffeldBeact+ 1609 2927 $10,213,014.12 -$799,274.00 $]132,450.22 510.729,414.11 $?,429,740.11. .. Vero Beach,City of 1561 4935 $59,113.61 •559,113.61 50.00 539,113.61 $0:00• Vero Beach,CO of 1561 2293 $1,705,298.47_ •$399,34$.00_ -$36,233.62 51.669,064.85 $1,269,719.85 Vero Beach,City of 1561 201.8 $56,289.95 -$56,289.95 50.00 556,289.95 $0.00• Vero Bead),City of 1361 1863 51,739,686.W -$204,131.00 $5,485.04 $1,745,151.04 $1,541,020.04 Vero Beach,City of 1545 4173 5651,207.53 -5331,950.00 50.00 $651,202.53 $269,252-53 Dept of Juvenile Justice 1545 6407 $108,617.00 -$108,617.00 50.00 5108,617.00 50.00 Worthington Springs,City of 1545 6119 5407,849.00 $0.00, -$31,652.10 $375,196.90 $376,196.90 Totals 13 14 $47,463,444.79 -337,234,371,56 $16,221,231.31 $63,074310,87 $45,837,938.32 Variance 0167 vs FRO Find 433,455,603.67 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 6 of 14 t I' STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT RICK SCOTT • BRYAN W.KOON Governor Director July 25, 2012 Ms. Cheryl Pryor •• Collier County 3301 Tamiami Trail, Admin. Bldg. • Naples, FL 34112 • • Re: Overpayment Dear Ms. Pryor: The attached invoice is in reference to an overpayment for Hurricane Wilma: FEMA-DR-1609-FL. (see attachment) • Please remit to the State of Florida: $ 11,172,272.62 at: Division of Emergency Management 5900 Lake Ellenor Drive Orlando, FL 32809-4634 Attention: Renee Singh, Deputy State Public Assistance Officer of Finance Please contact Renee Singh via e-mail, Renee.Singh@em.mvflorida.com or by phone 407-858-2761 should you have any questions or need any additional information. Respectfully, • • L,44L1, Charles Shinkle Deputy Bureau Chief • Division of Emergency Management Attachment: CS/tca • FLORIDA RECOVERY OFFICE • DIVISION HEADQUARTERS • STATELOOISTICSRESPONSECENTER • 5900 Lake Ellenor Drive 2656 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2702 Directors Row Orlando, FL 32809-4834 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Orlando, FL 32809:6831 407-858-2761 Tel: 850-413-9969•Fax: 850-488-1016 www.Florida Disaster.orq • CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 7 of 14 INVOICE STATE OF FLORIDA Division of Emergency Management . Date: Jul 23, 2012 Invoice #: 122 • To: Collier County(FIPS: 021-99021-00) 3301 Tamiaml Trail, Admin Bldg . Naples, FL 34112 Disaster PW# Federal Share Adman State Share Line Item Total 1809 2700 $11,095,283.52 $55,476.42 $0.00 $11,150,759.94 . 1609 2704 ($16,816.80) L ($84.08) $0.00 ($16,900.88) 1609 6733 $38,222.45 $191.11 $0.00 $38,413.56 SubTotal $11,172,272.62 Make checks payable to State of Florida for total amount of: $11,172,272.62 State of Florida Public Assistance, 5900 Lake Ellenor Drive, Orlando, FL 32809-4634 Phone(407) 858-2761 Fax(407)$58-4429 renee.singh @em.myflorida.com • • • 1 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business • 8 of 14 Payment#122 Protect 2700 FEMA-1609-DR-FL 021-99021-00 Payment #122: Project 2700 (L - Cat G) Collier County . • • Eligible Federal Admin State Obligated &Approved Version 0(Large)-Initial Obligation $3,381,940.54 $2,536,455.41 $16,909.70 n/a System Administrator-Apr it 2006 • Version 1 (Large)-Federal Share Change • $0.00 $507,291.08 $0.00 n/a System Administrator-Jan.'s,2007 Version 2(Large)-Federal Share Change $0.00 $338,194.05 $0.00 n/a • System Administrator-Jun 19,2007 Version 3(Large)-Eligible Amount Change $9,486,535.40 $9,486,535.40 $47,432.68 n/a Renee Singh-Aug 30,2010 Version 4(Large)-Version Modification $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 n/a Renee Singh-Oct 18,2010 Version 5(Large)-Version Modification $0.00 $0.00 . $0.00 n/a Renee Singh-Jan 6,2011 Version 6(Large)-Eligible Amount Change ($11,095,283.52) ($11,095,283.52) ($55,476.42) n/a Renee Singh-Jul 16,2012 • $1,773,192.42 $1,773,192.42 $8,865.96 $0.00 Justified by RFRs (100.0°/x) . RFR#1 -Expense Approval $761,256.08 • John Schmidt-May 16,2008 • RFR#1 -Expense Approval $1,272,301.32 Nick Behrman-Jul 28,2006 RFR#1 -Expense Approval $255,883.14 Melissa Vallejo-Aug 2,2008 RFR#1 -Expense Approval $803,931.91 Darryl Cox-Jun 27,2007 • RFR#2-Expense Approval $9,775,103.49 Katherine(Lenie)Hulett-Sep 3,2010 Reversal of Overrun -$11,095,283.52 • $1,773,192.42 $1,773,192.42 $8,865.96 .$0.00 Previous Payments Payment#54 $570,942.06 $3,806.28 $95,157.01 Orlando Rodriguez-May 16,2006 Payment#77 $954,225.99 $6,361.51 $159,037.67 Nick Behrman-Jul 28,2006 Payment#79 • $191,912.38 $1,279.42 $31,985.39 Orlando Rodriguez-Aug 2,2006 Payment#91 $343,416.08 $0.00 ($171,708.04) Orlando Rodriguez-Mar 12,2007 Payment#107 $723,538.72 $4,019.66 $0.00 Yen Cal-Jul 27,2007 Payment#108 $309,337.24 $0.00 ($114,472.03) • Van Cal-Oct 31,2007 • Payment#119 $9,775,103.49 $48,875.52 $0.00 Jamie Booth-Jan 8,2008 Payment#117 ' $0.00 ($0.01) $0.00 Jamie Booth-Jan 8,2009 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 9of14 • -$12,868,475.94 - $64,342.38 - $0.00 Adjustments + $0.00 + $0.00 + $0.00 This Payment ($11,096,283.62) ($65,476.42) $0,00 This payment leaves a balance of$0.00. • Payment calculations es et Jul 19,2012. • Printed from FlorldaPA.org on Jul20,2012 at 12:54 PM. • • • • • • • • • • • • CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 10 of 14 Payment#122 Project 6733 FEMA-1609-DR-FL 021-99021-00 Payment #122: Project 6733 (L - Cat G) • Collier County • • • Eligible Federal Admin State Obligated &Approved Version 0(Large)-Initial Obligation $625,964,16 $469,473.12 $3,129.82 n/a System Administrator-May 22.2006 Version 1 (Large)-Federal Share Change $0.00 $93,894.62 $0.00 n/a System Administrator-Jan 18,2007 Version 2(Large)-Federal Share Change $0.00 $62,596.42 $0.00 n/a System Administrator-Jun 20,2007 Version 3(Large)-Eligible Amount Change ($107,135.18) ($107,135.18) ($535.87) n/a System Administrator-Jan 30,2008 Version 4(Large)-Eligible Amount Change $31,993.47 $31,993.47 $159.96 n/a Renee Singh-Aug 17,2010 Version 5(Large)-Eligible Amount Change ($38,222.45) ($38,222.45) ($191.11) n/a Renee Singh-Jul 18,2012 • $512,600.00 $512,600.00 $2,563.00 $0.00 Justified by RFRs (100.0%) RFR#1 -Expense Approval $625,964.16 Aaron Harden-Jun 11,2007 • Reversal of Overrun -$113,364.16 $512,600.00 $512,600.00 $2,563.00 $0.00 Previous Payments Payment#106 $563,367.74 $3,129.82• $0.00 Yen Cal-Jun 12,2007 . Payment#110 $62,596.42 $0.00 $0.00 Van Col-Oct 31,2007 Payment#119 ($75,141.71) ($375.71) $0.00 • Jamie Booth-Jan 8,2009 —$550,822.45 — $2,754.11 -- $0.00 Adjustments + $0.00 + $0.00 + $0.00 This Payment ($38,222.45) ($191.11) $0.00 Thls payment leaves a balance of$0.00. Payment calculations as at Jul 19,2012. • • Printed from FlortdaPA.org on Jul 20,2012 at 12:55 PM. • • • • CAC September 13,2012 L';'+�1.t X v r>S r i i t 1:ra�+�,C,v't?- h w.y.a M.r`?yt f 4" ";i t >F mt4 !R 1 kI �-r Zt r4 a�f .'nv':.f . ; ,tr'„s,11.K N t r<: ' D !+ �•�' �.P 7 . , ,_ r VII-1 New Buness 12;r'ry,,,o� a '"° „ ,' ` Sa " ° „RIDA RECOVERY OFFICE b$ + 1 ERTSEIB � ' 4 a 0 LAKE DR 4TH FLOOR a -LANDO FL 3 ?aD 3479 9[0 -4 ?� .cg DE213 1OO ��gV;£ x 4 = = o- ' fiT,' .�n � � : ''11t�t gS'4 t �n r.3, L r am :(y r ;�„-. N� 1t ` '�4 ;. � � pw'' S` wk " y v - f #.` M N '� nAl ., 1 x 7L te a.4 4 � F ' .;.� ^G � J40s 4 rk k4 r 7 d rJ i sA ' Z c ?. ' +d;14&rip v F , 7- t y r N $a a * F P r° :4 A ,,, y ,ec S , �l�r 9 Tk tiw ar0.X 5 R. 9 1 li x ,;:r S ID + k .'%11:3` .,r 2 Y } a, r 4 A4 t . ' „+ 4 .r 1,' , ° '� > '�.f fi t.: '' ,AS' r7 4 9 + t ar � t I p v...rz� r - \0 � f '. A ��s to ai�`S.. ) L L � lY t 1 5i-s 5 3 01 TAMAMI IMIL ADMIN BLDG I• NAPLES FL 34112 h ; ATTN:CHERYL PRYOR• CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 12 of 14 PryorCheryl From: McAlpinGary Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 1:18 PM To: LorenzWilliam; CasalanguidaNick; IsacksonMark; FinnEd; PryorCheryl; SummersDan Subject: FW:Collier Beach Data Request August 21, 2012 Attachments: Region IV Audit Follow-up DD-11-23.pdf; Collier County PW-566-3 Gabrielle.pdf; Collier County PW-568-2 Gabrielle.pdf;Collier County PW-575-2 Gabrielle.pdf; Collier County PW-673-3 Gabrielle.pdf; Disallowed Cost Initiative-FEMA Letter.pdf; Region IV Audit Follow- up DD-11-23(2).pdf Importance: High All, Attached is a response that I requested from FDEM relative to the FEMA de-obligation of funds,our appeal and the "Disallowed Cost Initiative Program" recently instituted by FEMA. Bob Seibert is the Lead Deputy Public Assistance Officer from the State who we received all our direction from. Bob is clear and direct in his statements and has indicated the effect of the Disallowed Cost Initiative in the State as Nick has requested. In addition to the 11 organizations mentioned, I know of 3 Cities in Broward County where reversals have occurred. If you have any questions, Please give me a call. I have not forwarded this to Leo and am suggesting that you do. Gary From: Seibert, Robert [mailto:Robert.Seibert@ecn.myflorida.com) Sent:Thursday, August 23, 2012 10:41 AM To: McAlpinGary Cc: French, Bruce Subject: Collier Beach Data Request August 21, 2012 Gary, This is in response to our previous conversations on the Collier Beach FEMA Region IV issues. • Attached are the latest PW versions of the GabrielleDR1393 PWs that are a request in Bruce's email. • PW566 V3,PW568 V2,PW575 V 2,PW673 V3. • All of the other PWs requested are available in FloridaPA.org. • The laws and regulations in effect in 1988 and 2000 are available at FEMA.gov.. • The Policy Guide 322 is also available at FEMA.gov. The 1999 version may not be available on line because FEMA normally keeps the current versions available to avoid confusion. • The point of reference for the laws in effect during the requested time lines would be in the applicable yearly version of 44CFR,which is available on line. • The other items listed in your request are available on line at the FEMA.gov site,and or Floridapa.org. • A search of the FEMA.gov site should be able to bring up copies of the other items that are requested. • The latest versions of the four Gabrielle PWs would have all of the notes applicable to each PW in the General Comments section of the PW. 1 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 13 of 14 I do not see the need for all of the additional information that Bruce is requesting,but it is available from the FEMA on line site provided above. Establishing a position to counter the de-obligation of the funding within DR1609—PW2700 is premature at this time because we do not yet have a FEMA determination specific to the First Appeal.I would caution bringing up all 10 PWs that are involved in the Collier nourishment because to date only DR2700 has been de-obligated. It would be in your best interest to review the status of all 10 PWs in FloridaPA.org prior to adding a list of more PWs to FEMA Region IV. Regarding the position that FEMA is in an austerity position,attached are two documents that outline and or discuss the "Disallowed Cost Initiative"that began in 2011 whereby FEMA is in the recovery of cash mode.This brings the timing of the recent de-obligation of Collier's beach projects into play.While the de-obligation of PW2700 funds are not associated with an OIG Audit,the$11M dollars shows a recovery of funds by Region IV,which also adds to the Disallowed Cost Initiative total of recovered dollars. • The DHS Disallowed Cost Initiative Memorandum to FEMA management outlines the methods that the FEMA Regional Managers are to employ in order to recoup Federal funding that is determined to be questionable in OIG audits. • The attached Region VI memorandum is an OIG audit conducted to identify areas where that Region was deficient in following the recoupment of FEMA funding.This is provided to establish in one's mind's eye that there is a concerted effort to recoup funds. • In addition to this memorandum,the results of the OIG audit of Region IV in Atlanta provides a vanilla view of findings,which continue to show up in the memoranda to the OIG that Region N concurs with the OIG findings. This includes concurrence on items where Region N's findings agree with the OIG even when the findings in question disagree with the FEMA Closeout work product of their own Region IV employee's who were working out of the FRO in Orlando.This action also casts aspersion on each Management level that signed and approved these apparent incorrect documents. The Region N DHS OIG audit follow up report is attached. Gary, Regarding the extent of the affect of OIG audits within the State of Florida,the following summary indicates the DHS Disallowed Cost Initiative is having a significant effect of the Government organizations in the State. • There are 11 State organizations that have borne the brunt of 0I0 questioned items. • The total dollars that were de-obligated in the 11 audits are$86.9 Million. • This makes the average OIG audit items questioned per audit at$7.9 Million. • These audits all occurred in calendar years 2011 and 2012. • The Collier de-obligation dollars are included in the numbers above. There are a number of issues with the Region IV position on the Collier DR1393 items challenged in the audit report.The eligibility of the Collier PWs for Gabrielle were upheld in a FEMA SECOND APPEAL and it is my understanding that once a second appeal is ruled upon the items included in the appeal are NOT subject to change.FEMA would have to contradict their own guidelines to make any changes to the Gabrielle PWs. The issues with the DR1609 de-obligation of the$11 Million are basically that the FEMA position relative to annual maintenance authorized by the pre-2001 permit from DEP was ignored along with the$1.9 Million in the cost associated with the 50,000 cubic yards of sand placed to offset annual dune erosion.The other significant issue with the DR1609 FEMA action is that the appeal findings in the DR1393 document state that the ineligible costs in the(DR1609— PW2700)PW should be evaluated further,not acted upon.FEMA took action on the DR1609 PWs without this subsequent evaluation of the facts.Another factor in this relative to the FEMA ruling is that Collier County provided copies of all of the invoices for the replenishment of the sand,whereas FEMA has made these costs ineligible without a substantiating historical basis. Also,please note that this is now under a first appeal status that FEMA will have to provide a basis for their de-obligation action.This response to the first appeal will be developed by Region N staff. The bottom line to all of what has occurred is that neither the State nor.Collier have made any mistakes in the application of 44 CFR programmatic issues.Also,the cost numbers,which are all substantiated with historical cost documentation were part of the PW package provided electronically to FEMA.All of the damages documented were eligible per the Public Assistance Regulations in 44CFR according to FEMA Management. At the risk of being redundant,the cost 2 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-1 New Business 14 of 14 numbers were complete and accurate and the PA Program regulations were correctly applied at the time of entry into the NEMIS System. What is being used to make PW2700 ineligible is opinion regarding storms that were not named as disaster events.These storms that were not declared by FEMA are not documented by date in their appeal determination statements,which means the issues cannot be challenged with specific data.This is futile as trying to punch holes in smoke.It is my opinion that the first appeal rebuttal case should not be developed further until the first appeal response is received from FEMA. That is,there is no position to challenge until the FEMA first appeal position on DR1609—PW2700 is in hand.What is under a first appeal for PW2700 is the de-obligation of the$11 Million and this has not been done properly according to the determination letter in the DR1393. Gary, Please give me a call when you receive this email. Bob Robert M. (Bob) Seibert Lead Deputy Public Assistance Officer Florida Division of Emergency Management Phone: 407-858-2803 Blackberry: 850-528-5096 Fax: 407-858-4429 email: robert.seibert(u�em.myflorida.com t.'ncer Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not Send eiectranlc mail to this enfrfy.Instead,contact this:Nice by telephone or in writing. 3 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2 New Business 1 of 1 CPE COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD,BOCA RATON,FL 33431 561-391-8102 PHONE 561-391-9116 FACSIMILE Website: www.coastalplanninq.net E-mail: maik coastalplanninq.net September 18, 2012 Alex Reed Environmental Administrator Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mail Station 300 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000 RE: Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Fiscal Year 2013/2014 Funding Request Dear Ms. Alex Reed: On behalf of Collier County, please find enclosed the FY 2013/2014 Local Government Funding Request for Collier County. Both the Collier County Beach Renourishment and South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Projects' Local Government Funding Requests are included within this submittal. The Collier County Beach Renourishment LGFR is provided as Attachment A, and the South Marco Island Beach Renourishment LGFR is provided as Attachment B. Included are the following for each of the projects: 1) Completed FY 2013/14 Local Government Funding Request Application for each project (including project descriptions, eligibility and project schedule and funding information) 2) Project Maps 3) Lodging Occupancy and License Information The Local Sponsor Resolution will be sent under separate cover. If you have any questions or comments regarding this submittal, please feel free to contact me or Gary McAlpin. Sincerely, COASTAL PLANNING &ENGINEERING, INC. Stephen Keehn, P.E. Senior Coastal Engineer cc: Gary McAlpin, Collier County Vince George, BBCS CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 1 of 51 FY 2013-14 Local Government Funding Request Project Name: Collier County Beach Nourishment Project Project Description: This project includes the yearly physical beach monitoring, biological monitoring for the nearshore hardbottom, permitting, and design leading to renourishment in 2013/2014. The proposed nourishment project for 2013/2014 is described in a recent engineering report (CPE 2011). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of existing structures and beach fill design templates, and changes needed to resolve hot spots and improve project performance and durability. The proposed design addresses the renourishment needs of the three segments constructed as part of the 2006 renourishment project with an increased beach width and height. The project's goal is to optimize both cost and design. The design volume is based on the quantity of sand needed to re-establish the design berm and provide 6 years of advanced nourishment using the 2006 project design. The permit limits of the Vanderbilt project area are approximately R-22 to R-31, but fill will be placed south of R-25 + 500. The permit limits of the Park Shore project area are approximately R-44 + 450 to R-54 + 400 with a gap between R-47+500 and R-50. The permit limits of the Naples Beach project area are approximately R-58A to R-79. There are two gaps at R-64+500 to R-68+200 and R-72+600 to R-79. The amount of fill needed to bring the historic project areas back to design standard with a six year design life is 420,000 cubic yards based upon the 2012 monitoring survey, with some areas having a larger construction template compared to the 2006 design. The equilibrium toe of fill will not encroach upon the hardbottom and will be landward of the 2006 permitted equilibrium toe of fill. Table 1 provides the fill limits, sand volumes, design beach width and berm elevation for each segment of the proposed renourishment project. This volume takes into account the impacts incurred from Tropical Storm Debby which passed through Collier County on June 25, 2012, but not Hurricane Isaac which affected the gulf coast of Florida in August 2012. The primary sand source (borrow area T1) is located in federal waters approximately 33 miles from'Vanderbilt Beach (see Figure 1). The construction window will be September 15 to May 31,'which'avoids peak sea turtle nesting season. Mobilization is targeted for September 2013. Table 1.Fill volume,design beach width and berm elevation for each segment of the proposed renourishment project. Beach Segment Fill Limits Fill Volume Diesign Berm Elevation Beach Width (NAVD) Vanderbilt Beach R-25 +500 to 60,000 cy 100 ft. 4 ft. R-30+500 Park Shore R-43 +500 to 119,000 cy . 85 ft. 4 ft. R-54+400 Naples Beach R-58A to R- 241,000 cy 100 ft. 4 ft. 72+600 TOTAL VOLUME=420,000 cy POTENTIAL TOTAL VOLUME* =500,000 cy CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 2 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment REDFISH--,. I PASS u . CAPTWA vl ISLAND A '\BLIND .1 } t v ASS ` SANIBEL a'' V� 'a. �9 SAN b ISLAND `� ^'f CARLOS BAY �'' a 4"a' a,A a'1.t., ES'TERO ISLAND - \ Cd ',� 'N1^...% 16 LOVERS KEY \ .... �� %° ) ■y +k SORROW''•� ' AREA 11 '`,. 9„ ",�s \ iti, .....,..,,tee t rte.-......>t/ 3,/,jEs, , Vii. BAREFOOT -°..-. \..._.,ti WIGGINS-.. ,;�BEACH PASS L� M>012ki 8 ` VANDERBILT 4.,,,,w, \ BEACH ' /,‘ Rat• � CLAM-a} PARK f i PASS ; / l;/T SHORE 9 MILE LIMIT-i R DOCTORS ASS ,,y ` t NAPLES GULF OF 1 , MEXICO � Ni6Ji:k` I R:i.,i H`. AOSS RDON : .,,., 0 20000 40000 loom CAP I PASS-. It ...h✓' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT \.. BIG RCO PASS 4.F'• f' "A,.., \ v`.. '.1. . ,-..,,, , ..,,,i , ,,t,.,, NOTES: :} 1.COORDINATES HEREON ARE BASED ON FLORIDA STATE \ �` Y C PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM,EAST ZONE.NAD 1983. \ 2 ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET BASED ON \ ^ \1 e .L"• NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM.1929(NGVD 29) \ \ CAPE ROMANO'\ BORROW AREA \ It � 6 .. Figure 1. Borrow area T1 located in federal waters, approximately 33 miles from Vanderbilt Beach off of Collier County. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 3 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment BAREFOOT BEACH 1i WlGGINS PASS / �l TALLAHASSEE JACKSONVILLE v iv*DELNOR-WIGG6i� :- PROJECT-.� STATE PARK N TS. LOCATION ORLANDO ' • `TAMPA AnANTiL: OCEAN HENDRY CO \ O BOLA LEE --------. ..—.-...- RATON f y CO. 4 . r MIAMI .:NDERBLT c / GULF N roo400 VANDERBI� „_, CH ° q m' OF „�" till; MEXICO *¢ I R ' C s r MEXICO 00."' .d'°¢ PERMITTED "'o - PIPELINE CORRIDOR R40 CLAM PASS `r $3�$fit ' SR 898 + N 660000 er 4 ,, N 680000 10 50 III PARK SHORE ...,-- ^--- .,�=r ; ARK ••■: 4., DOC +RS PASS.r I SR 886 , (.4:.„oat 4 , SR 856 NAPLES Y ,'- N 660000 ^+t- " �J N WOW_ mw µ °'a-r. p � � SR 84 woo . arms :\. LEGEN?� ' f _——- PERMITTED PIPELINE CORRIDOR `�� MEM 2006 PERMITTED TEMPLATE .'''."°50-:',.-X--1 NEW SEGMENTS GULF k 1 PROPOSED NEARSHORE �F lOPERATIONAL AREAS !RE SO PERMITTED OPERATIONAL ASREAS MEX/GO . 1-:#)RT ROYAL A R70 FDEP MONUMENTS NOTES: GORDON PASS 1. COORDINATES ARE IN FEET s BASED ON FLORIDA STATE EAST ZONE, ORTHEmERICM, i. 8 t� FOOD 8000 EAST ZONE.NORTH AMERK:AN rqi DATUM OF 1983(14A083). B }c' GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT 2 FILL WIDTHS ARE NOT TO SCALE. m . Figure 2. Project location map of the Collier County Renourishment Project depicting the pipeline locations, pipeline offloading areas,and fill extent for the proposed project. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 4 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment The 2005/2006 re-nourishment project consisted of the restoration, using approximately 665,000 cubic yards of hydraulic fill, and maintenance of up to eight miles of Gulf of Mexico shoreline along unincorporated Collier County and the City of Naples. This project was completed in May 2006 with the main goal to avoid environmental impacts such as hard-bottom coverage and a design project life of six years. The borrow area (T1) was located just over 33 miles north- northwest of Vanderbilt Beach and was chosen due to the coarser sand availability which will avoid near-shore hard-bottom coverage. A one acre artificial reef was constructed to satisfy mitigation permit requirements. The performance of the beach in avoiding hardbottom coverage has exceeded permit expectations, and the results of 4 years of physical monitoring indicate that the beach can be widened without a significant increased risk of hardbottom impacts. In 1995/1996 much of the same project area was hydraulically nourished with approximately 1.2 million cubic yards. Project Location: The City of Naples/Collier County Beach Renourishment Project is located on the southwest Florida coastline in Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental Protection monuments R-22 to R-31 (Vanderbilt Beach), R-44 to R-55 (Park Shore) and R-58A to R-79 (Naples Beach). The project permit limits consists of approximately 8 miles of Gulf shoreline, shown on Figure 2, but approximate 4.8 miles needs nourishment. Use of Requested Program Funds: Funds requested for FY13/14 will be used for permitting and construction costs associated with the renourishment in FY 13/14. Local Government Support Does this sponsor have dedicated support staff whose sole priority is to manage beach erosion control activities? Yes, the staff dedicates over a man-year to beaches each year. Name Title Email Percent Commitment Gary McAlpin Director,Coastal Zone GaryMcAlpin @colliergov.net 80% Management Clint Perryman Project Beach Inspector ClintonPerryman @colliergov.net 50% Address 1: 2800 N.Horseshoe Drive Phone: 239-252-2966 Address 2: Naples,FL 34104 Fax: 239-252-2950 Quarterly Report Compliance: 2011-2012 End Date Report Sent Compliant Qtr 1 (Sept) Sept. 30 N Qtr 2 (Dec) Dec. 31 N Qtr 3 (Mar) Mar. 31 N Qtr4 (June) June 30 N CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 5 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment How will revenue for the local funding cost share be established? Local funding for the project will be obtained by Collier County through a Tourist Development Tax. This provides a dedicated long term funding source through a `bed tax'. Collier County levies a four (4%) percent Tourist Development Tax on all rental income received from accommodations rented for six months or less. The four-percent (4%) Tourist Development Tax revenue is allocated by the Tourist Development Plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners as follows: 50% for beach park facilities and beach improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration and erosion control, including pass and inlet maintenance shoreline protection, enhancement, cleanup or restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access as these uses relate to the physical preservation of the beach, shoreline or inland lake or river. This funding source and dedication was approved by referendum. 13.4% for County owned or operated museums, to acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate or promote one or more county owned museums and for non- County owned museums that are owned and operated by not-for- profit organizations and open to the public. 36.6% for Advertising/Promoting and Special Events to bring tourism to Collier County. Is the funding from a dedicated long term source for this project? Yes Collier County has dedicated the majority of the Tourist Taxes to beach maintenance, including funding projects within the City of Naples, proof of which is attached. In order to acquire funding, a resolution from the local governmental entity must be provided by the application deadline which declares: • Support from the Sponsor for the Proposed Project • Willingness to serve as the Local Sponsor • Ability to provide the full Local Cost Share • Funding Source Has the local sponsor resolution been attached to the application fulfilling all of these requirements? It will be provided after approval later this month This project is detailed in Collier County's 10-year Capital Plan for Beach Projects which has been approved by Collier County Board of County Commissioners(Attachment 5). Has the State cost-shared in a feasibility or design phase of this project? Yes Previous State Cost Share percentage 36.2% 10-Year Project Schedule and 5-Year Estimated Budget Does this project have Congressional Authorization? No CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 6of51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment Does this project have a Federal Project Cooperative Agreement? No What is the end date of the Federal Authorization? n/a Federal cost share available for this erosion control project: n/a Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and Naples have FEMA Category G funds due to damage as a result of Tropical Storm Fay. This has beep included within the 5-year estimated budget under the Federal Cost Share column at 75% of FEMA eligible cost. It is essential that construction be funded by the State in a timely manner, since Federal (FEMA) funds are time limited with restricted extension rules. Schedule and Budget(Include estimated phases for 10 years and estimated project costs for 5 years): Total Proposed Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost Year Method Description Estimated Share Share Share Cost 2013/2014 Design& Survey $200,000 $0 $76,280 $123,720 Survey Construction Nourishment& $17,279,000 $4,988,000 $4,687,787 $7,603,213 Construction Services Monitoring Post Phys,Biological, $350,000 $125,000 $85,815 $139,185 Sea Turtles 2014/2015 Monitoring Post Phys,Biological, $400,000 $0 $152,560 $247,440 Turtles,Tilling 2015/2016 Monitoring Post Phys,Biological, $412,000 $0 $157,137 $254,863 Turtles,Tilling 2016/2017 Monitoring Post Phys,Biological, $424,360 $0 $161,851 $262,509 Turtles,Tilling' 2017/2018 Monitoring Post Phys, Biological,, $437,091 $0 $166,706 $270,384 Turtles,Tilling Design Engineering Report $300,000 $0 $114,420 $185,580 and Permit Application 2018/2019 Monitoring Phys, Biological, Design Engineering Report 2019/2020 Monitoring Phys,Biological, Design Plans&Specs Construction Renourishment 2020/2021 Monitoring Phys,Biological, 2021/2021 Monitoring Phys,Biological, 2022/2023 Monitoring Phys,Biological, CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 7 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment Length of Project Boundary in Feet: 25,300 ft. Length of commercial or recreational property fronting the project shoreline: 5,863 ft. Percentage of project shoreline designated as commercial or recreational property 23.17% Eligibility: Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments: See Attachment 1 for detailed listing and maps. Cost Sharing Summary Total Eligible Total Adjusted Commercial & Reach Shoreline Length (ft.) Shoreline Lengths Recreational (without gaps) (ft.) Vanderbilt 4,991 5,300 2,656 Park Shore 3,937 8,800 987 Naples 10,375 11,200 2,220 Total 19,303 25,300 5,863 Eligible Shoreline% 76.29% 23.17% State Cost Share % * 38.14% Licenses for the hotels are listed in Attachment 2 Additional Ranking Criteria Will this project enhance or increase the longevity of a previously- constructed project? Yes Although the design life will be the same, the physical plan will enhance the design. The design project life will be 6 years, similar to the 2006 project design. The next project is scheduled for a September 2013 construction start, a'7.6 year life. The 2013/2014 project is being designed with less uncertainty, greater economy and should perform better than the 2006 project. The two greatest hot spots are receiving special attention in the latest design. In addition, gaps are being left where no fill is needed, creating a savings. Will this project nourish a previously restored shoreline? Yes Rate of Erosion as determined by the Bureau based on long term data (ft/yr) 3.7 ft./vr CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 8 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment Severity of Erosion: The beach performance at Collier County has improved the last few years, but the hot spot will govern future performance and they are in need of immediate nourishment. A majority of the project area has been designated by FDEP as critically eroded. The Naples Beach and Park Shore areas are currently experiencing severe erosion at their hot spots as illustrated in Figure 1. The hot spot are influenced by the being down drift of inlets with a couple of structures which don't function well under current condition. The project area is losing an average of 3.7 ft/yr since June 2006. The two major hot spots south of Doctors Pass in Naples and at Seagate Blvd. in Park Shore are 85 feet and 70 feet behind the design width at their worst locations. These receded shorelines exist after an interim truck haul project at each location. These two hot spots are critical, since they act as a feeder beach for the down drift beaches. The two other major hot spots are located in Vanderbilt beach (Vic. R-27) and Park Shore (Vic. R-52). The large hot spots are offset by areas where beach nourishment will not be needed this year. The asymmetry is reflected in the fact that as of 2012, the project area has 77%of the volume remaining from the 2006 nourishment, but the shoreline width has only 49% remaining. The shoreline perform is very important because the tourist judge a beach by its' dry beach size, and not underwater volume. Threat to Upland Structures: N/A CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 9 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment 2012 TOTAL BEACH WIDTH REMAINING -DESIGN STANDARD —NOV.OS — —JUNE 2006 --JULY 2011 •AUG.2012 1 200 1\ 1 I 4—Park Shore-4 r-Vanderbilt-4 \ it t 175 1 11 I 1lt I ‘ ' k I 150 r-,.1F kF , ?I i1 { 1\ 141v J1�f\ ! .' \y1 125 r " rr�►�.ra t/�tl. «� 100 \ ► s ' ‘ V; '':1 ' ' V q4 1 k 75 1t: � 50 t3 gg d 4, iEi 'Y. 25 4 Naples Beach '* r ° t Vii° 1 J t 9 0 'Air ll ' It .. 1St; NOTE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM 2003 BASELINE SET AT BACK OF BEACH �.,. -25 ;'° 747 7 7 11; ;;;;; ; ;§ ;;i;;;-4; ;;;N "TI 4 74f� i74.7ar ; ; a 0 Hot Spots in 2012 1® Clam Pass Park and Pelican satin( F R-MONUMENT LOCATION NORTH Bay not in project limits Figure 3. Beach Width Performance Trends throughout northern Collier County Project Benefits: Shoreline development within the project area consists of over 19,000 linear feet of publicly accessible beach. 2,651 linear feet of the Vanderbilt Beach property is commercial or recreational. This includes six hotels, Delnor-Wiggins State Park and Collier County's Vanderbilt Beach Road Park. 987 linear feet of the Park Shore property is zoned commercial or recreational and eligible. This includes three public access streets (City of Naples). 2,220 linear feet of the Naples Beach property is zoned commercial or recreational. This includes the City of Naples' Lowdermilk Park, two hotels and numerous public access streets and walkways. The attached maps identify public beach access points, hotels, and other commercial facilities within the project area. Threatened and endangered marine turtles utilize the entire project area for nesting purposes although none of the areas within the project area have been designated as a sea turtle refuge. Mitigation of inlet effects: Periodic dredging and bypassing has taken place at Wiggins Pass, Clam Pass, Doctors Pass and Gordon Pass in recent decades. The total volume of sand bypassed to adjacent beaches from the four inlets since completion of the 1996 project is estimated at approximately 600,000 cubic yards. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 10 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment Since December 2005, Doctors Pass has been dredged twice, for a total volume of 86,000 cy. All of the material was by-passed south of the inlet to Lowdermilk Park. The State Strategic Management Plan calls for bypassing 10,000 cy per year, which recent efforts have exceeded. Sediment bypassing has exceeded 100% of the goal. Bypassing has occurred at both Wiggins Pass and Clam Pass to meet state and local non-numerical objectives. Use of Innovative Applications of Existing Technologies: Current and new technologies will be used for the upcoming renourishment project and subsequent monitoring. An investigation to improve hot spot performance and tune structures (modify, eliminate or add) using the latest modeling methods was completed. Modeling shows that tuning structures and expanding the project limits will improve performance, but will be held for future budgeting. Major outfall and groin combinations will be redesigned to reduce their impact on the adjacent beaches and reduce hot spot sizes. Removal of groins is being considered to alleviate the impact of major lake outfalls on Naples Beach. Sand performance of the active profile has exceeded permit expectations, and beach widening is feasible without significant threat to nearshore hardbottom. This will allow design of a beach that can last the nourishment interval. Nourishment Interval (years): 6 years (2013/2014 project design) Project Performance: The next project is scheduled for a September 2013 construction start, a 7.6 year life. The 1996 project lasted 10 years between nourishment. The last project was built between January 23, 2006 to May 23, 2006, with dredging starting on February 21, 2006. Is this project being planned or constructed in cooperation with another local government? Explain? Yes Collier County and Longboat Key have been actively planning a joint project for the 2013-14 construction seasons. They have developed a joint agreement and set out preliminary project timing. Captiva Island is tentatively supportive of joining the team for the potential saving, but has not commented on the agreement. All three communities used similar equipment for their 2005-6 projects, which bodes well for a successful joint project. The communities have discussed the methods and potential saving with 3 dredging company and are developing strategies to achieve the savings. Savings are achievable for both mobilization and unit costs, and can amount to millions of dollars. A copy of the proposed joint agreement and documents from the dredgers are provided in Attachment 4. Captiva Island is also interested in a joint project because of the savings. Collier County and the City of Naples are jointly sponsoring this project, and monitoring for all of Collier County projects is combined for economy, including both the physical and biological monitoring. The communities have discussed potential savings with 3 dredge companies and are developing an agreement and strategies to achieve savings. Savings are achievable for both mobilization CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 11 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment and unit cost. A copy of the proposed joint agreement and documents from the dredge companies are provided in Attachment 4. Significance: The project is 25,300 feet long or 4.79 miles long. Ready to Initiate Construction: The Collier County project has 10-year Federal and State permits, requiring a modification. The Collier County TDC has the local share available for immediate construction. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 12 of 51 ATTACHMENT 1 Basis for Local Funding and Project Maps CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 13 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment ATTACHMENT 1 FUNDING ELIGIBILITY COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT Vanderbilt Beach Segment Project Boundary: 300 ft. south of R-22 to 500 ft. south of R-30 Approximate Shoreline Length: 8,204 ft. Project Gaps: R-22 + 300 to R-25 + 500: 2,904 ft. Adjusted Shoreline Length: 5,300 ft. On-site Adjacent Total Public Access Spaces Spaces Spaces Delnor Wiggins State Recreation Area* 355 0 355 Vanderbilt Beach Road* 340 21 361 Qualifying Hotels Qualifying Shoreline Vanderbilt Shorest (In Gap) 550 ft. Bayshorest (In Gap) 297 ft. Gap La Playa 360 ft. Vanderbilt Beach—Beach Cottages' 100 ft. Vanderbilt Beach Resot 100 ft. Ritz Carlton' 741 ft. Area determined to be publicly accessible Total Length 300' south of R-22 to 110' north of T-25 (In Gap) 2,640 ft. R-26 to R-30.5 4,137 ft. Area determined to be critically eroded R-22.3 to R-30.5 Total eligible shoreline length: 4,991 ft. Total adjusted shoreline length: 5,300 ft. Percent eligible for State funding: 94.17% State eligibility incorporates the total project length(critical and non-critical)and eligibility only recognizes publicly accessible critically eroded shoreline. *Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms. 'Overlap CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 14 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment FUNDING ELIGIBILITY COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT Park Shore Project Boundary: R-43 +500 to 400 ft. south of R-54+400 Approximate Shoreline Length: 11,412 ft. Project Gaps: R-47+ 500 to R-50: 2,575 ft. Adjusted shoreline length: 8,800 ft. On-site Parking Spaces Adjacent Total Public Access Metered Permit* Spaces Spaces Horizon Way 21 17 0 38 Vedado Way 25 14 6 39 Via Miramar 29 12 0 41 Seagate Drive (within .25 mile) 0 0 38 38 Clam Pass Park 0 172 0 172 Area determined to be publicly accessible Total Length R-42 to 494 ft. south of R-44 3,870 ft. 1,087 ft. south of R-50 to 60 ft. north of R-54 2,210 ft. Area determined to be critically eroded R-50.5 to 390' south of R-54 +400 3,940 ft Total eligible shoreline length: 3,937 ft. Total adjusted shoreline length: 8,800 ft. Percent eligible for State funding: 44.74% State eligibility incorporates the total project length(critical and non-critical)and eligibility only recognizes publicly accessible critically eroded shoreline. *Permit spaces are available to residents and the general public for the same price. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 15 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment FUNDING ELIGIBILITY COLLIER COUNTY BEACH RENOURISHMENT PROJECT Naples Segment Project Boundary: 1,050 ft. north of R-58 to R-79 Approximate Shoreline Length: 19,340 ft. Project Gaps: R-64+ 500 to R-68 +200: 2,880 ft. R-72 +600 to R-79: 5,260 ft. On-site Spaces Adjacent Spaces Total Public Access Public Permit** Public Permit** Spaces Lo dent ilk Park* 46 164 0 0 210 8' Avenue North 20 1 0 0 2l 7h Avenue North 10 4.1164 0 0 14 Nor th Lake NAvenue 19 20 0 0 9 Fill 6th Avenue North 5 5 0 0 10 5th Avenue North 0 0 0 0 0 4th Avenue North 11 4 0 0 15 3rd Avenue North 10 4 0 0 14 2"d Avenue North 12 4 0 0 16 1st Avenue North 11 6 0 0 17 Central Drive 8 4 0 0 12 1 s Avenue South 5 12 0 0 17 2n Avenue South 7 4 0 0 11 3rd Avenue South 8 6 0 0" 14 4th Avenue South 8 7 0 0 15. 5,,, Avenue South 0 20 0 ' 54 6 `Avenue Sou i 4 8 0 0 7th Avenue South 7 9 0 0 16 8th Avenue Szouth , 6 5 _ 0 0 11 9th Avenue South =.F, 11 4 0 {} '' 15' Fill 10th Avenue South 9 35 0 0 44 11th Avenue South 8 5 0 0 13 Broad Avenue 49 22 0 0 71 12th Avenue South 25 8 0 0 33 Pier Parking Lot 81 0 0 0 81 13th Avenue South 31 13 0 0 44 14th Avenue South 16 14 0 0 30 15th Avenue South 10 7 0 0 17 16th Avenue South 16 14 0 0 30 17th Avenue South 7 3 0 0 10 18th Avenue South 12 13 0 0 25 19th Avenue South 0 0 0 0 0 21St Avenue South 0 0 0 21 21 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 16 of 51 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—Collier County Beach Renourishment Adjusted Shoreline Length: 11,200 ft. *Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms **Permit spaces are available to residents and the general public for the same price Qualifying Hotels Qualifying Shoreline Edgewater Hotel 333 ft. Naples Golf and Beach Club 939 ft. Area determined to be publicly accessible Total Length 85 ft. north of R-58 to R-79 10,375 ft. Area determined to be critically eroded 85 ft. north of R-58 to R-79 11,200 ft. Total eligible shoreline length: 10,375 ft. Total adjusted shoreline length: 11,200 ft. Percent eligible for State funding: 92.63% State eligibility incorporates the total project length(critical and non-critical)and eligibility only recognizes publicly accessible critically eroded shoreline. *Primary beach access contains a minimum of 100 parking spaces and public restrooms. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 17 of51 �✓.-_ T r } +6' 0i,"5� '' a end: Q Project Boundary 706000 � Pmjaq Boundaries wRh Gap R°22�+ h- QPublic Beech Access&Parking �,+.�'�r`� ._ � Zoning: � ra -k 4'.. ClCommemial °°" ' iRecreational °y � ..„,c Atical Erosion Area ° - t. ♦ FDEP Monuments � � � � ,'`Notes: -"gt ieia 1.Coordinates am in feet based on the Florida R 23 'fi° State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone, ��, "" � - _ North American Datum of 1983.(NAD83). r+gAYry 4 ,E 2.Date of Aerial Photography'January 3,2012. i.:: j ;:y' '{ �- .".'3.Publicly-Owned Property and Beach Hotels � 4 �,,'�,��c`"y and Resort Contlos basetl on the Al- 2012 parcels provided by the �-, Collier County GIS Department 704000 I24 R sG . + 3 td4 •W --- rSe"^^ +i.:'.4NR" a9af^ y.'"'k a ,, � �d 1 C'" `s -',7:/".1+4- ,x¢!; ,� n +4, e x y� ,,‘, 2f �,� ,� tl,�j aq� e g dx p 4 "iR 26 - :� ',a 702000 e ,4....04 i .,-' T.4sMexf " s #"4 C � / 4an."; ss {" vt r a "� Gulf � .�' ° y VP iP S�,c x�r F�q�'✓r akA ��_ - a. " �C-, l �8 �` -. 4 61'0 A v ';700000 t. f s . 4 It: .0. g alp �✓ ! y 1� 4 •ix COASTAL PLANNING i `r ENGINEERING,INC. ice✓ 3r R 3Ut., ><< . # �- Collier County Beach r � ;�t Long Range Beach Plan e ' Vanderbilt Beach Segment 0 350 700 r r �� r-; " lig Feet 2 a" 8 •, ....o. l inch=700 feet E y " CAC September 13.2012 VIII-8 New Business 18 of 51 �„" r..��, Leoend• = .,�^°°•° r LeProject Boundary R at y;e, Project Boundaries with Gap { a 0\1;1 ©Public Beach Access&Pailong � � X � ?o a�n Zoning: r r �, ,t4).'. I � pam " Recreational • ^�' fig. NCritical Erosion Area R-41 � • a 4 s4', ` O FDEP Monuments . i't °�+ �k a"�' Notes: �ark 1 Spares '„*iR�✓-; 1 '.1 Coordinates are In feet based on the Florida •.,, ■ s fix= State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone, 4q� ° North American Datum 011983.(NAD83). R 12 a�+, .' i1 ro fi+`2 Dale of Aerial Photography:2009. �_ "1r .? 3.Publicty-Owned Property antl Beach Hotels SS�; and Resort Condos based on the s�P' .,;'...::,4''`f r w\ 2012 parcels provided by the a .. Cotner County GlS Department ro 5.. . rr ✓` - t , R a5 g ,, ., A. •r "f y�,' wF d i � s t I kI }�r� < r a .Ta wN ®t.5° as, } z r r - r - 'Art., D f p 9* < Parlii fA51 s ,, .� g �$y rY 4 �T� °+ P.�r Y f I ,47":0:.°--e-, T.','4,"X' '� , .1 4. ��-•KI1"3� -9 ) sgyd P R F "4' ;/ $',,,n4',.., rtQ}9pw�ep»�vye&4-•, + ''41'',n v .a ,�� s 9 t i , - : z =� �i 4 s r'13' :'..,„..t. per-R ' ,s ° ,, F a '" �t 44.3�" .* ^ss eta# � a 1� ° !:. � 'T+° _a a izf c a 8 ms R Std � '1` t e 1 ., iei , ' xi 4',f�f G v ;a D R ,, °P^ } •�. *� T +n3 M MN .X " + > 52 ' '' a de 4r%dds ' nd vi 1.198 S , y spa es z e ± ,o x We �/''';'w .::,) a M #.- z t r` 674000 ;A °� g !" r ,�.t s �"^- • t ID t t*: COASTAL PLANNING& °?'��"'_y,�'q�+�1• it b u ENGINEERING,INC. iiii ^ 4. r s& ,It 1 0 fix .�E pfma. :;'$''' y'r 7b . �Lx Y f i i.� »# „e...%-a:.�i "� ��a � Collier County Beach hhy r er •"c. Long Range Beach Plan ReSb q a1 �''i.� '� c...� Park Shore Segment 0 625 1250 ? .--y`key Sl •• �; � ".p"°■ i Feet c rb .74.'':::.;!.sa ....,®. moo.. 1 inch=1,250 feet fii Imo�,�. ' e i CAC September 13,2012 Vile New Business 19 015 1 670000 '°Y`. e ; Le eel' °q t -I Project Boundary A > '3 ,tea k 4� ,. d * Project Boundaries with Gaps Doctors Pass rid ; 9 ®Public Beach Access 8 Perking snt� � � �1�b t>. Zoning: "`� r -�i'" t t rs-'a Commercial y t _1 �.� � ^� � � Re � 'l.' °- ,,,,�Recreabonal 665000 \/Critical Erosion Area Edgewater BeachHot� R r. ,�° "�s ♦ FDEP Monuments ��V x �"; g Notes: p, 'y c s * 1.Coordinates are in feet based on the Fbrtde � '�1. # x P r State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone, 7 ' y North American Datum ec 1953.(NAD53). r' m 2.Date of Aerial Photography:January 3,2012. `1 § �, s.:� :?-3.Publicly-Owned Property and Beach Hotels g`.a ^4 ,4, { V;., and Resort Condos based on the 666000 .a f 4 3 ...,x,.4 2012 parcels Provided by the R 6+.21ctP'`tk si r "�, i Collier County GIS Department. a ,i. mJ Y -f ) !::;',Ii;!:::,..,1:!:.;,•.';‘,'„ & Naples Beach&Golf x1 ee4000 ` n R 63 ..' 1a a .f { a k �* w: uk J S1.';7.';' :;'' »"-1 t "vq4 3fi 7 tR R1 6J 0 >i4 .if 0 '4 F 14 Pa k J SI �'� ‘;'::''''''411.1'41' �" +f A JP k JSP. 'r� � d � �.u°riia '"� 1< 662000 10 Pr k y 51 ai, m R 6 a1'n rh J t a�• 3 t: 1gq�e t �p'V r 175 s' r , 4r R 6 514 1 k J SI fl YB ; *"4 4 V1 Gulf of r,16,P k �Sild t Lm 660000 Mexico •�''rr t5 i"t ) •,3 °pri S `t-7�P g SI Y r '4 6 �R68°i} . p 1 p g` 12 k 1 SPqa� J r =�� a� ^'" j ^, i; S t 5 a ,f x g s i r 17rP k 751A , -r`yx tfr �. 1; ffi1 T hs';'''''''':79"'"" C'-: s t .. 2-a ,11 P c,1 P»>��.� a g �x °"' t°5r9; rz14 P k J SI £ •,r„f ''....F.--,A!,':°'44'•. 701 ck-,.;00i* ,V ,3 ,a5, y V , 658000 1 tsP k V .':r° ;4::f,',',1' ' ; ' es4Pk IV ,, V V aT .�� .;r 12 P i9�S x ...13;;..�t'8�°" �f 6 P k I SI R7Z ,.:, ^ f . s $ ,. 3 +1�" 'sa i 11TP.gh 1sP . 1 1,� ' ' ... 656000 15 P'rk Jt51 A" t r�r t * ' ?= pfd kInll Sl l 4, ,,r P be s J Sl.ices ‘ ''74 ar� w5»?e vC t RKM!=5��, .s w°,`»?4.y tc �33 P k J Sn -� } a p � Y� 654000 .P1','`''''es ._ �:-` t6 V k 951 ;2 '''''t 1'Y> ' k>s 4 J .V *'f° COASTAL PLANNING 6 R �10 P§ark �Sptcy .i ENGINEERING INC. gyOP rk J51 b " 'Y 25.1 k yt$li c 1s'W !,�r� i.+��+ s,r,Y, i. R^k OP h y5pa "4 t s=", *� Collier County Beach '� Long Ran a Beach Plan zi P�tk� r:'spa�es Naples Segment a. Y 0 750 1,500 ' 5 i""`'r'.°FF:.•Feet s '. '• Y<,� � e 1 Inch=1,500 feet s g■ ,' 5'.. 0 .�. t�� CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 20of51 ATTACHMENT 2 Hotel Licenses and Property Information CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 21 of 51 Collier County Local Government Funding Request Property Name:Cape Marco Property Address: 970 Cape Marco Dr. Marco Island, FL 34145 License Number: PR1G025964 The referenced property has a total of 683 units,of which,683 are available to the public on a rental basis.Therefore,a total of 100%percent of the property is available on a rental basis. The above information was obtained from the Rob Hart, Manager in August of 2012. Collier County Local Government Funding Request Property Name: Edgewater Beach Hotel and Club Property Address: 1901 Gulf Shore Boulevard North, Naples, FL 34102 License Number: HOT2100269 The referenced property has a total of 126 units,of which,126 are available to the public on a rental basis.Therefore,a total of 100%percent of the property is available on a rental basis. The above information was obtained from the hotel website in August of 2012. Collier County Local Government Funding Request Property Name: Naples Beach &Golf Hotel Property Address: 851 Gulf Shore Boulevard North, Naples, FL 34102 License Number: HOT2100044 The referenced property has a total of 317 units,of which,317 are available to the public on a rental basis.Therefore,a total of 100%percent of the property is available on a rental basis. The above information was obtained from the hotel website in August of 2012. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 22of51 Collier County Local Government Funding Request Property Name: LaPlaya Beach Resort Property Address: 9891 Gulf Shore Drive License Number: H0T2102616 The referenced property has a total of 189 units,of which, 189 are available to the public on a rental basis.Therefore,a total of 100%percent of the property is available on a rental basis. The above information was obtained from the hotel website in August of 2012. Collier County Local Government Funding Request Property Name:Vanderbilt Beach Resort Property Address: 9256 Gulf Shore Drive, Naples, FL 34108 License Number:CND2100054 The referenced property has a total of 47 units,of which,47 are available to the public on a rental basis.Therefore,a total of 100%percent of the property is available on a rental basis. The above information was obtained from the hotel website in August of 2012. Collier County Local Government Funding Request Property Name: Ritz-Carlton Property Address: 280 Vanderbilt Beach Rd, Naples, FL 34108 License Number: H0T2101047 The referenced property has a total of 450 units,of which,450 are available to the public on a rental basis.Therefore,a total of 100%percent of the property is available on a rental basis. The above information was obtained from the hotel website in August of 2012. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 23 of 51 Collier County Local Government Funding Request Property Name:Vanderbilt Shores Rec Assn Inc. Property Address: 10701 Gulf Shore Drive, Naples, FL 33963 License Number: PR1M006385 The referenced property has a total of 28 units,of which, 28 are available to the public on a rental basis.Therefore,a total of 100%percent of the property is available on a rental basis. The above information was obtained from the hotel website in August of 2012. Collier County Local Government Funding Request Property Name: Bayshores of Vanderbilt Beach Property Address: 10475 Gulf Shore Drive. Naples, FL 34108 License Number: PR1M007820 The referenced property has a total of 30 units,of which,30 are available to the public on a rental basis.Therefore,a total of 100%percent of the property is available on a rental basis. The above information was obtained from the hotel website in August of 2012 Collier County Local Government Funding Request Property Name:Vanderbilt Beach-Beach Cottages Property Address: 9467 Gulf Shore Drive, Naples, FL 34108 License Number: TRM2102697 The referenced property has a total of 19 units,of which, 19 are available to the public on a rental basis.Therefore,a total of 100%percent of the property is available on a rental basis. The above information was obtained from the hotel website in August of 2012. DBPR-VANDERBILT BEACH MOTEL; Doing Business As: VANDERBILT .Ptembtra e2R3f I I-a eii13usinegs 24 of 51 i-09:49 PM 8/21/2012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: VANDERBILT BEACH MOTEL (Primary Name) VANDERBILT MOTEL CONDO (DBA Name) Main Address: 9256 N GULFSHORE DR NAPLES Florida 34108 County: COLLIER License Mailing: 9256 N GULFSHORE DR NAPLES FL 34108 County: COLLIER LicenseLocation: 9256 N GULFSHORE DR NAPLES FL 34108 County: COLLIER License Information License Type: Vacation Rental - Condo Rank: Condo License Number: CND2100054 Status: Current,Active Licensure Date: 01/01/1901 Expires: 12/01/2012 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective Group 11/15/2002 View Related License Information View License Complaint View Recent Inspections 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee Ft,32399 Email: Customer Contact Center: Customer Contact Center: 850.487.1.395 The State of Honda is an AA/EEC.,employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida.Privacy Statement Under Florida law,email addresses are public records.If you do riot want your email address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.If you have any questions,please contact 850.487.1395. 'Pursuant to Section 455 275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed tinder Chapter 455,F.S.most provide the Department with an ernail address if they have one.The mails provided may he used for official communication with the licensee However email addresses are public record Ti you do not wish to supply a personal address,please FP ovide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chapter 455 page to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=88C748F6EF238E311 BF... 8/21/2012 DBPR-VANDERBILT BEACH LLC; Doing Business As: BEACH COTTAGES c �w at, r2F1�f 25 of 51 1-00:03 PM 8/21/2012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: VANDERBILT BEACH LLC (Primary Name) BEACH COTTAGES (DBA Name) Main Address: 9467 GULF SHORE DR NAPLES Florida 34108 County: COLLIER License Mailing: 9467 GULF SHORE DR NAPLES FL 34108 County: COLLIER LicenseLocation: 9467 GULF SHORE DR NAPLES FL 34108 County: COLLIER License Information • License Type: Rooming House Rank: Transient Rooms License Number: TRM2102697 Status: Current,Active Licensure Date: 02/26/2004 Expires: 12/01/2012 • Special Qualifications Qualification Effective View Related License Information View License Complaint View Recent Inspections • 1940 North Monroe Street.Tylig,haAyee F4 32399 Email: Customer Contact_C4-_nt4,E Customer Contact Center 850 487 1395 The State of Honda is an AA/EEO employer.C,okyLight 2007-2910 State of Florida.Privacy StaSeme t Under Florida email addresses are public teCords.if you tic`not;"ant your email address released to response to a pubi c:records request,do not send eiecir true mail to this entity.Instead,contact the oflice by phone or by traditional snail,if you nave any questions,please contact 850.487.1395. 'Puisuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.5.must provide the Department with an email address if they have.one.The emails provided may be used lot official communication with the.licensee. However email addresses are public record.If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chapter 4'5 page to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/L icenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=497EA343 BBC4FEA3 87... 8/21/2012 DBPR- LA PLAYA LLC; Doing Business As: LA PLAYA RESORT, Hotel CAC NeeWeB�Sil21°�f 1 26 of 51 10:58:48 AM 8/21/2012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: LA PLAYA LLC (Primary Name) LA PLAYA RESORT(DBA Name) Main Address: 9891 GULF SHORE DR NAPLES Florida 34108 County: COLLIER License Mailing: 9891 GULFSHORE DR NAPLES FL 34108 County: COLLIER LicenseLocation: 9891 GULFSHORE DR NAPLES FL 34108 County: COLLIER License Information License Type: Hotel Rank: Hotel License Number: HOT2102616 Status: Current,Active Licensure Date: 01/30/2002 Expires: 12/01/2012 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective View Related License Information View License Complaint View Recent Inspections 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahagsee FL 32399 • Email:Customer Contact Center Customer Contact Cenrer. 850 487;395 The State of Honda is an AA)CEC employer.Couvrigh_2007-29Y.Q.State of Florirla. iy,asy Statement Under Flni:da law,entail addresses are public records.H you do not want yeas ewe address released in response to a publtecreccrds iequest,do not send electronic mad to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.If you have any questions,please contact 850.487.1.355. `Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 451,F.5 must provide the Department with an email address if they have one.The emads provided may he sued for official communication with the licensee However email addresses are public record.If you do not with to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our chapter 455 page to determine it you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=C3 5DD7D743 EC92D8F 1... 8/21/2012 • DBPR-VANDERBILT BCH MTL INC; Doing Business As: VANDERBILT BEA ?temt> 2p I a ew Busin s 27 of 51 11'0415 AM 8/21/2012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: VANDERBILT BCH MTL INC (Primary Name) VANDERBILT BEACH MOTEL (DBA Name) Main Address: 9225 GULF SHORE DR NAPLES Florida 34108 County: COLLIER License Mailing: 9225 GULF SHORE DR NAPLES FL 34108 County: COLLIER LicenseLocation: 9225 GULF SHORE DR NAPLES, FL 34108 County: COLLIER License Information License Type: Motel Rank: Motel License Number: MOT2100006 Status: Current,Active Licensure Date: 01/01/1901 Expires: 12/01/2012 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective View Related License Information View License Complaint View Recent Inspections 1940 North Monroe Strget,_7oltahassee FL 3233 Email: Customer Contact Center Customer Contact Center: 8S0 487.1.395 The State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer.Cpsyrioht 2007-2010 State of Clojidaz Privacy Statement Under Florida law,email addresses are public records If you do not want your email address released in response to is public-records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mad. If you have any questions,please cuotar't 850.487 1395. ,Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,Icensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department with en email address if they have one.The mails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. however;mad addresses are public record.If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can he mode available to the public.Please see our ChapitL4.k.5 page to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myrfloridalicense.cam/LicenseDetail.asp?SIDoo&id=43EE4D78714309680E6... 8/21/2012 DBPR-RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY LLC & CCRC;Doing Business Agri iv`eW m1ba 2P13f 1 28 of 51 11'01.48 AM 8121/2012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL COMPANY LLC & CCRC (Primary Name) RITZ CARLTON NAPLES (THE) (DBA Name) Main Address: 280 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD NAPLES Florida 34108 County: COLLIER License Mailing: 280 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD NAPLES FL 34108 County: COLLIER LicenseLocation: 280 VANDERBILT BCH RD NAPLES FL 34108 County: COLLIER License Information License Type: Hotel Rank: Hotel License Number: HOT2101047 Status: Current,Active Licensure Date: 01/01/1901 Expires: 12/01/2012 r i Special Qualifications Qualification Effective View Related License Information View License Complaint View Recent Inspections • 1940 North Monroe Str et,Tallahassee FL 32399:• Email: Customer Contact Center • Customer Contact Center: G',;0 487 1305 The State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer Coovright 2007-20.1k5:01e of Florls10A Prlvacy$tetement Under Florida law.email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request,co not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mad. If you have any questions,please contact 850.181.1395. 'Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department with all email address if they have one The ernails provided may be used for official comrm nrcvt:on with the licensee. However email addresses are public record If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide.the Department wits an email address which cat he made available to the public.Please see our cbipter 455 page to determine if you are affected by this change https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=347876E1 F8D253FCC8F... 8/21/2012 DBPR- PANTHERS RPN LLC; Doing Business As: EDGEWATER BEACH HO.pfcq§wtemtphg2pv.f 1 t5ew Basin s 29 of 51 10:53:17 AM 8/21/2012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: PANTHERS RPN LLC (Primary Name) EDGEWATER BEACH HOTEL AND CLUB (DBA Name) Main Address: 1901 GULFSHORE BLVD N NAPLES Florida 34102 County: COLLIER License Mailing: 1901 GULFSHORE BLVD N NAPLES FL 34102 County: COLLIER LicenseLocation: 1904 GULFSHORE BLVD N NAPLES FL 34102 County: COLLIER License Information License Type: Hotel Rank: Hotel License Number: HOT2100269 Status: Current,Active Licensure Date: 12/20/2004 Expires: 12/01/2012 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective View Related License Information View License Complaint View Recent Inspections 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee FL 3239„.2 Email: Customer Contact Center •Customer Contact Center 850.487 1395 The State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer.Couvright 2007-2010 She or Florida.Privacy Statefleat Under Florida law,email addresses are public records.If you do not want your email address released in response to e public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.II you have any questions,please contact 850.482.1395. 'Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department,with an email address If they have one.The mails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee however email addresses are public record.If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department rv:th an email address which can be made available to the public.Please sec our Chapter 455 page to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=4BC416781 D74B3 E7FB... 8/21/2012 DBPR- WATKINS H B & JONES E A; Doing Business As: PENT HOUSE HOTE'�,�4BWegbfav52P1t3f 1 30 of 51 12'28.03 PM 8/22/2012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: WATKINS H B &JONES E A (Primary Name) PENT HOUSE HOTEL(DBA Name) Main Address: 851 N GULF SHORE BLVD NAPLES Florida 339405332 County: COLLIER License Mailing: 851 N GULF SHORE BLVD NAPLES FL 34102 County: COLLIER LicenseLocation: 851 N GULF SHORE BLVD NAPLES FL 34102 County: COLLIER License Information License Type: Hotel Rank: Hotel License Number: HOT2100044 Status: Current,Active Licensure Date: 01/01/1901 Expires: 12/01/2012 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective View Related License Information View License Complaint View Recent Inspections 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee FL 32399 :: Email: Custome_r_conta_ct Center• Customer Contact Center•850.467 1395 The State or Florida is an AA/FCC,employer.c_cjovriQht 200_-7Q10 State of Florida,Privacy Statement Under Porida law,email addresses are public records.If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic:mall to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail,If you have any questions,please contact 850.487.1395. 'Pursuant to Section 455 275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department with an email address if they have one.The ernails provided may be used for official comrnuremil vn with the licensee. However email addresses are public record.It you do riot wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chanter 455 page to determine if you to e affected by this change https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=C9FFCC6AC3 C665C935... 8/22/2012 DBPR- BAYSHORES OF VANDERBILT BEACH PH 1, Condominium Project CA a Neeptem 4 108f 1 31 of 51 3:30.21 PM 8272012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: BAYSHORES OF VANDERBILT BEACH PH I (Primary Name) (DBA Name) Main Address: 10420 GULFSHORE DR NAPLES Florida 33940 • County: COLLIER License Mailing: LicenseLocation: License Information License Type: Condominium Project Rank: Condo Project License Number: PR1M007819 Status: Approved,Recorded Licensure Date: 07/30/1979 Expires: 01/01/2013 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective Multi View Related License Information View License Complaint View Additional Information 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallaha,_,s_ee Ft.32399 .. Email Customer Contact Center.. Customer Contact Center 850.487.1395 The State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Floriiia.privacy Statement Under Florida law,email addresses are public records.If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.If you have any questions,please contact 850.487.1395 "Pursuant to section 455.275(1) Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department with an email address if they have one.The emails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee. However email addresses are public record.if you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chapter 455 page to determine it you are affected by this change, https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=49AA7A99D778251 EA8... 8/27/2012 DBPR-BAYSHORES OF VANDERBILT BEACH PH II, Condominium Project CAC New B Sil�it 2°�f 1 32 of 51 3:30:32 PM 8/27/2012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: BAYSHORES OF VANDERBILT BEACH PH II (Primary Name) (DBA Name) Main Address: 10475 GULFSHORE DR NAPLES Florida 339632034 County: COLLIER License Mailing: LicenseLocation: License Information License Type: Condominium Project Rank: Condo Project License Number: PR1M007820 Status: Approved,Recorded Licensure Date: 07/30/1979 Expires: 01/01/2013 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective Multi View Related License Information View License Complaint View Additional Information 1940 North Monroe_street,Tallahassee FL 32399:: Email:Customer Contact Center::Customer Contact Center:050.487.1395 i he State of Florida is an AA/EEO employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida.Privacy Staternetit Under Florida law,email addresses are public records.If you do not want your entail address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic malt to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.If you have any ruesfions,please contact 850.4237 1395."Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes,effective October 1,2012,I.censees licensed under Chapter 455,F S.rnusi. provide the Department with an email address they have one.The emails provided may he used for official communication with the licensee However ei nail addresses are public record. If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be rnade avadahle to the public.Please see our Chapter 455 page to determine if you are affected by this change https://www.myfloridalicense,com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=F253 8501 BE4D28EA 15F... 8/27/2012 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 33 of 51 ATTACHMENT 3 Corps of Engineers Study Authorization for Naples, Park Shore and Vanderbilt Beaches CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 34 of 51 From: Val Gelnovatch [mailto:vgelnovatch @tfgnet.com] Sent:Tuesday, September 04, 2012 12:25 PM To: WightDebbie; McAlpinGary Cc: Amanda Wood Subject: RE: Collier County and Marco Island Beach Collier County's WRDA 2007 authorization authorized the USACOE to undertake a reconnaissance study when it stated: "The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples beaches,Collier County, Florida." Ever since then the USACOE needed to allocate$100k to undertake the recon study. We have worked with the delegation and USACOE on many different strategies to get USACOE to fund this recon study. Collier's delegation has requested funding to complete the reconnaissance study for more than several years. After several congressional cycles went by with the study unfunded,we met with USACOE at county offices in April of 2011, and subsequently submitted a request to Senator Nelson to authorize USACOE to be able to sign, upon completion, a USACOE-approved, County-funded study, and move it to the Feasibility phase. There has been no movement on WRDA since that submission 18 months ago (mostly due to the earmark moratorium hindering this highly-earmarked bill.) The Congress would like to move a WRDA bill now; however,the bill cannot contain anything that is project or location specific, since that would be considered an earmark. During the past two years the USACOE and the White House have not included funding in the President's budget for our recon study. Congress has not been prevented from earmarking funds for the project during this Congress, and the USACOE has not been able to include funds for the project in its Workplan because Congress will not allow appropriations to be used for new start projects. From: WightDebbie [mailto:DebbieWight @colliergov.net] Sent: Friday,August 31, 2012 4:19 PM To: McAlpinGary; Val Gelnovatch Cc: WightDebbie; Amanda Wood Subject: RE: Collier County and Marco Island Beach Importance: High Gary, Here are FY 11 and FY 12 briefs/requests for Beach Renourishment. Both also indicate we were authorized in 2007 in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA). Val, You are probably gone for the long weekend. Please see Gary's request below. I put the attachments above for requests in FY 11 and FY 12. Do we have CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 35 of 51 anything in writing? We received the 2007 WRDA authorization for Beaches, then we have been working on getting the Recon. Thanks! Have a GREAT weekend, ladies. -Debbie From: McAlpinGary Sent: Friday,August 31, 2012 3:52 PM To: WightDebbie Subject: FW: Collier County and Marco Island Beach Debbie, Can I get some help with this on Tuesday? Steve needs confirmation that Collier was approved for a beach recon study and also proof that we have requested funding. From: Keehn, Stephen [mailto:Steohen.Keehn(ashaworp.com] Sent:Thursday, August 30, 2012 10:34 AM To: McAlpinGary Cc: Sharp, Nicole Subject: Collier County and Marco Island Beach Gary Do you have any letters or agreements from the Corps stating they are working on or towards a phase of a Corps project for you beaches? I need this for the LGFR iydtaia %dm,P.E. Senior Coastal Engineer Coastal Planning& Engineering, Inc. Shaw Group Direct 561-361-3151 Office 561-391-8102 (fax 9116) Mobile 561-441-5499 stephen.keehn@shawgrp.com CAC September 13,2012 Colter County - ►- • 'less Collier County Federal Legislative Agenda FY 2012 Appropriations 2011 Grants Funding Priorities • Priority Targeted Potential Federal Resources 1-75/Everglades Boulevard Interchange Federal Transportation Appropriations $4 million for design Transportation Reauthorization Bill FHWA Grant Opportunities 1-75/Collier Boulevard/SR 84(Davis Boulevard) Federal Transportation Appropriations $4.5 million to update PD&E and begin design Transportation Reauthorization Bill FHWA Grant Opportunities Naples Bay Restoration Federal Energy and Water Appropriations (project authorized in 2007 Water Resources& Direct USACE Allocations Development Act) $450,000 for US Army Corps of Engineers study Beach Renourishment Federal Energy and Water Appropriations (project authorized in 2007 WRDA) Direct USAGE Allocations $100,000 to fund engineering studies and permitting Vanderbilt Lagoon Federal Energy and Water Appropriations (project authorized in 2007 WRDA) Direct USACE Allocations $250,000 to study feasibility of environmental restoration Tri-County Water Interconnect Federal Energy and Water Appropriations (project authorized in 2007 WRDA) Direct USACE Allocations $5,000,000 for water interconnections with the cities EPA Grant Opportunities of Naples and Marco Island Collier Health Services Federal Health and Human Services Appropriations $500,000 for Assistance to Rural and Senior Health and Human Services Grant Opportunities Residents Ochopee EMS/Fire Station on 1-75 National Park Service Cooperative Agreement $3,000,000 for 3,000-square-foot facility with 2 bays DHS and DOJ Grant Opportunities $6,000,000 for Med Flight Aircraft OHS and DOJ Grant Opportunities Collier Area Transit Federal Transit Administration Grant Opportunities $6,000,000 for Radio Road Transit Site Development Transportation Reauthorization Bill As New Federal Funding Opportunities Arise During the Year,Additional Projects May be Identified CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 37 of 51 Colt County Collier County Beach Renourishment Congressional District: Representative Connie Mack Problem: Collier County Beaches are designated as critically eroded by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Past renourishments have occurred within a 8-10 year cycle with the last renourishment occurring in 2005. Project Description and Status: A Reconnaissance Study is necessary for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to determine a federal interest in the project. The purpose of the project is to renourish Collier County, Florida beaches to protect the upland structures, promote a healthy ecosystem and advance tourism within the county. Beaches that are in need of renourishment are Vanderbilt Beach, Park Shore Beach, Naples Beach and Marco Island Beach. The project received the following authorization in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2007: SEC.4033. COLLIER COUNTY BEACHES,FLORIDA.The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Vanderbilt, Park Shore,and Naples beaches, Collier County, Florida. Funding Needs and Budget: The County is seeking $100,000 in the USACE budget for the USACE to perform the Reconnaissance Study,generate a project management plan and a cost sharing agreement with the county. Federal Funding History: There is no history of federal funding for this project. For More Information: Debbie Wight, Collier County, (239)252-8113,debbiewight @colliergov.net Amanda Wood,The Ferguson Group, (202)261-3684,awood @tfgnet.com Val Gelnovatch,The Ferguson Group, (202)270-4074,vgelnovatch @tfgnet.com CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 38 of 51 ATTACHMENT 4 Copy of the Proposed Joint Agreement and Documents from Dredgers CAC Se003iiay 13,2012 VIII-a 14,411Vit ffd3eports 39 of 53 of 10 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT The(/4tyyi own of Longboat Key and Collier County, Florida FY 2013/14 Beach Renourishment Project I THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT(the"Agreement")made between the(ityl(jPriov,n of Longboat Key(Longboat Key),a municipal corporation of the State of Florida,having its I principal offices at x-kckxx� v- 501. Isles Road,1 orte,boatLLl\;e‘_l iorida 31228 and Collier County,a political subdivision of the State of Florida,having its principal offices at 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples Florida 34112, and 1. WHEREAS,Collier County Beach Renourishment 2. WHEREAS,t he(i-tv_l ov n of Long-13boat Key Beach Renourishment 3. WHEREAS, in recognition of the mutually beneficial goals of working together cooperatively and in order to reduce costs through mobilization savings and economies of scale, the Parties are desirous of entering into an Interlocal Agreement for the project known as The ( n of Longboat Key and Collier County FY 2013/14 Beach Renourishment Project. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING AND THE MUTUAL COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS HEREIN CONTAINED THE PARTIES AGREE,WARRANT AND COVENANT AS FOLLOWS: 1. Description of Collier County Project: 12. Description of the(itv fawn of Longboat Key Proiect: 3. Term of this Agreement: I The term of this Agreement shall be for the completion of the ci1y 1 own of Longboat Key and the Collier County,Florida FY 2013/14 Beach Renourishment Project. This Agreement shall terminate upon the satisfactory completion of the Participating Parties' financial, construction,and construction monitoring obligations and responsibilities. 4. Schedule: I The + t+I ooti,^n of Longboat Key and Collier County both agree that providing optimum schedule flexibility to the dredging contractor is critical in obtaining favorable pricing. A conceptual schedule is outlined below and subject to mutually agreed modifications at CAC Sitlbay 13,2012 VIII-a Ratv33SisiffElleports 40 of 54 of 10 contract award. • Beach renourishment scheduled during FY2013/2014 • Bidding by 1/1/2013 • Collier County can only renourish from 9/15/2013 to 5/31/2014. Pipeline corridors and mobilization can precede 9/15/2013 renourishment start date. • Longboat Key has the ability to conduct year round renourishment. The first section of Longboat Key's renourishment is expected to occur prior to the Collier County renourishment. The second section of Longboat Key renourishment is expected to be completed after the Collier County renourishment is complete. 5. Contracting and Project Approach There are three sections of the bidding, contracting,and execution of this contract; the common areas where both agencies will share the costs;the renourishment and associated costs specific to Longboat Key; and the renourishment and associated cost specific to Collier County. Each section will be clearly identified in the contract documents,the bid tabulation sheet and the instruction to bidders. A copy of this finalized Interlocal Agreement between the k-tit Iov■"n of Longboat Key and Collier County for the FY 2013/14 Beach Renourishment Project will be included in the bid and contract documents. 6. Area of Shared Financial Responsibility:, The Ci y lotwn of Longboat Key and Collier County will jointly be responsible for mobilization and shared contracting costs. Three areas of shared financial responsibility are anticipated as part of this agreement. They are Mobilization/Demobilization, common bid documents and Performance and Payment Bonds. Mobilization/Demobilization is defined per this agreement as • The costs to mobilize equipment;material;labor and supervision to Longboat Key to complete the first section of the Cita-to wt's renourishment,plus: • The costs to demobilize and remobilize equipment;material;labor and supervision to complete Collier County's renourishment,plus: • The costs to demobilize and remobilize equipment;material;labor and supervision to complete the second section of Longboat Key's renourishment,plus: • The cost to demobilize from Longboat Key. These costs will be split evenly between Longboat Key and Collier County with 60%of the overall mobilization/demobilization costs paid to the contractor once 2,000 CY's are pumped and accepted on the first section of the Longboat Key project. The final 40%for demobilization will be paid once all equipment,materials and supplies have been removed from all beaches. Both munieipaiifies t.�c;ncua will need to sign off on these —Formatted Stnkethrough payments. ---- ---- - ---Both municipal governments will share the costs for the preparation of common bid Formatted:Stnkethrough ocuments. It is anticipated that these will consist of bid instructions,bid tab,bid forms and common specifications. 2 CAC 949tdritteef 13,2012 VIII-a IVIW33i3taffElleports 41 of 55 of 10 Performance and Payment Bonds will be prorated between the its[i}w) of Longboat Key and Collier County based 911...the percentage of the total renourishment costs each ageth ie.;-agenc\'s portion represents. Both agencies will need to sign off on these payments. If one agency elects not to move forward with this agreement and not enter into a renourishment contract then the remaining agency will have the option to cancel the project or move forward individually to fund the mobilization as required to execute its portion of the project. This may include the entire mobilization costs. 7. Areas of Specific Financial Responsibility Each agency will be responsible for all costs associated with the renourishment of its own beaches.This will include but not necessarily be limited to: • Design Engineering • Plans and individual specifications • Permitting • Agency/Individual plans and specifications • Agency beach renourishment costs($/CY) • Beach tilling • Buoys and Pipeline Corridors • Turbidity monitoring • Pre and post construction surveys • Biological monitoring • Construction management,engineering,monitoring and QA/QC • As-built drawings,record drawings and project certifications • Individual schedule management • Turtle Trawling including mobilization and demobilization,if any • Endangered Species observers • Relocation trawling • Legal expenses 8. Biddine/Evaluation/Contract Award The(=ityTown of Longboat Key and Collier County working independently have both retained Coastal Planning and Engineering as the Engineer-of-Record for their respective portions of the project. Both agencies working concurrently and with the Engineer-of-Record shall prepare the bid documents including, but not limited to, the Technical Provisions, Supplemental General Conditions, Insurance, Notice to Bidders, Advertisement of Bids, and Bid Reporting Forms to undertake the project. The bid documents, as prepared by the Engineer-of-Record, shall identify the portion of the Project within the jurisdictional boundary of each Party and further require that the bid submission identify the cost for each Party's portion of the Project. Each agency shall ensure that the bid specifications, prepared by the Engineer-of-Record, are in compliance with any governmental permits and/or approval requirements. Upon completion of the draft bid specifications, they will 3 CAC SQAt6111day 13,2012 VIII-a 1,18WEIDIsiffElleports 42 of 56 of 10 be forwarded to the municipalities for comment and review. Comments shall be incorporated into the final bid specifications and released for advertisement and bidding. Each agency must agree on the following contracting procedures. • Approval of the bid documents,. • Joint review and evaluation of all submitted proposals. Proposals will be sent to both the E it;,Town of Longboat Key and Collier County concurrently by the contractors. • Participate in all discussions and negotiations with potential contractors. • Selection criteria will be the lowest overall responsible bidder to both the individual nttaraic.ipalitr s--tagenciesand the lowest overall total project price. Il_the <tgencie. cannot agree u s n th wc-icct cl...C_tin ricJ/i - agencA desienets will negotiate a resolution betwcen the two v. rreies ttiwu lr the rank, until such resolution is reached,rust [LI the rvo r proje tn an ers then In the project dual tment heads then by the two agency R-1anaeers. If no resolution is reached. the next lowest overall responsible bidder may be awarded the bid. • Contractor selection will be subject to approval by both the City I own (<)st*taril t;r+m_m,ssipn_of Longboat Key and Collier County Board of County Commissioners or their designees (Note: this is an added step for "town of Longboat Key and will affect a change in normal project scheduling for the Town(. • Collier County will take the lead in the development of shared contract documents and contract bidding with complete review and approval by the tTawn of Longboat 4xyl g . • Each agency by authorizing resolution shall independently award its portion of the Project. By awarding the contract, each agency shall have committed to the expenditure of funds necessary for their share of the Project, which include mobilization/demobilization, common bid documents and performance and payment bonds as identified in];item 6,regardless of the amount of sand that shall be placed on the agency's beach. 9. Sufficient Funding Appropriation By executing this Agreement,each Party represents that the Party has undertaken all the necessary legal requirements to allocate sufficient funds for its anticipated expenditure/portion of the Project and has authorized the funding in accordance with applicable law. Funding is subject to appropriation by each government agency. 10.Escrow Account: ******to be reviewed with OMB and the Clerk's Finance Office. ,- Formatted:Highlight In order to facilitate and ensure the necessary shared financial responsibility of this project, the agencies alt+e---do _hereby agree to pay their share of the mobilization/demobilization, common bid documents and performance and payment bonds into a non-interest bearing escrow account and held by a mutually agreed to Escrow Agent as authorized by the municipalities. The Escrow Agent shall receive and hold the funds and shall be authorized to disburse the necessary funds upon authorization of both municipalities. 4 CAC SIVO3nrbay 13,2012 VIII-a libise33Dhaffdleports 43 of 57 of 10 11.Compliance Upon the award and execution of the contract,each agency shall be responsible to ensure that any work undertaken in connection with the Project complies with all governmental permits/approvals,the bid specifications and contract terms. Each agency shall comply with all Federal, State and Local Laws, rules, regulations, codes and ordinances in the performance of this Agreement. 12.Commencement of Project The schedule of work shall be arranged and coordinated by both agencies with the Contractor in such a manner so as to achieve the timely completion of the Project. Each agency will be responsible to coordinate with the Contractor to renourish its jurisdiction according to the contract plans and specifications or an approved modification. 13.Indemnification of Participating Parties The bid specifications and contract documents shall require that the Contractor defend, indemnify and save harmless each of the Participating Parties from any claims, suits, actions or demands from and against all losses,and all claims,demands,payments,suits, actions,recoveries,judgments,costs and expenses including without limitation attorney's fees,in connection therewith,of every nature,including but not limited to claims for bodily injury,or death,by any third party and by or on behalf of the contractors,agents,servants or employees arising out of or in connection with the Project work and caused,in whole or in part,by the Contractor,its agents,servants or employees. 14.Participating Parties'Contact Persons and Notices Each agency shall provide the name,address and telephone number for its contact person in connection with this renourishment project. The contact persons are as follows: Formatted:Indent:Left: 0",First line: 0" *...._The i i_r tToyac of Longboat Key: • Formatted:List 2,Bulleted+Level:1+ • 7 u l o i 1 3. Aligned at: 0.25"+Indent at: 0.5" Formatted:List 2,Right: 0 25, No bullets ... Town. t...._. or numbering,Tab stops: 2",Left 5u t Vii, t r Fiorida 34128 4 1) 316-19U9 Town of Longboat Lev Longboat .. Disrlda 34:12,D ;941) 198 b Pers3on, Tbwn Attorney 3.a_ iii:. r., :.son Davis i... _..Ci. .. a _: " D ar)n:;li, ?:, 365—1 • Collier County: 5 CAC S141 Mititay 13,2012 VIII-a ridiV3EIBtafffifieports 44 of 58 of 10 All notices required to be given under this Agreement shall be sent registered mail,return receipt requested,or as the Parties may later determine in writing,to the parties at the following addresses: The t--if 1 tip}...of Longboat Key: Collier County: Dave Bullock_Town Manager. $01 Flay Isles Road 1.(ngni ot...Key_,_[(orida.._4228.._...... ....................... _._._. 9=11-316-1999 .1nan J I laren a. Public Works Director 501 13a'y Isle Road I,onebo atK!.a,Florida '4'22 ..........................__....._...._...._.. 941-316-1988 David P Persson.Tours Attorney Rankin Persson Davis Mc(lenathan&I3arnell.PA_ l}i't)R ingling_Ro ulctiarl_............_..___...__.._............._. Sarasota Florida 34250 941-365-4950 15. Insurance ****this is really contract language—the parties agree to have uniform documents Formatted:Highlight above *****subject to approval by Risk Management Upon the award of the Contract Work,and prior to the Contractor commencing any work, the the-required certificates of insurance, which shall name each agency as an additional insured will be forwardg.l to the respective entities. All certificates and insurance policies shall bear the policy numbers,the expiration date of the policy,and the limits of liability hereunder. Said insurance shall be on an occurrence basis and shall be provided for thirty(30) days written notice of cancellation and/or non-renewal in a form delivered to each aa+++Ri fipi+li+ie*--agency as follows: The following insurance shall be required: • Commercial Automobile Policy—Commercial automobile coverage shall be required with limits of not less than $1,000,000 coverage for bodily injury and property damage. The policy and certificate shall provide coverage for "any auto", "hired auto" and "non owned auto" with symbols 1, 8 & 9 reflected on the certificate of insurance. • Commercial General Liability — Comprehensive general liability shall be required with limits of no less than $2,000,000 general aggregate(for both bodily injury and property damage), $1,000,000 per occurrence. Coverage shall be issued on a per location basis or per project basis. In addition,said policy is to provide coverage for (a) premises operations (b) completed operations/products liability, (c) explosion, collapse and underground(when required for work to be performed underground),(d) independent contractors,(e)broad form property damage,(f)contractual liability,(g) 6 CAC Self Critiblef 13,2012 VIII-a RaW3BillsiffElleports 45 of 59 of 10 personal injury liability. • Pollution Liability Insurance in the amount of$1,000,000 per occurrence,$2,000,000 aggregate. • Workers Compensation Insurance—Proof of workers compensation insurance must be submitted to the in+, 4it4e; agencies. The Contractor(s) shall take out and maintain during the life of this Agreement, workers compensation for all of their employees employed at the site of the project, and in case of any of the work being sublet the contractor shall require the subcontractor similarly to provide workers compensation insurance for all of the subcontractor's employees, unless such employees are covered by the protection afforded by the contractor. • Disability Benefits Liability Insurance—Proof of disability benefits liability insurance must be submitted to the irm+itipaii+i entities. • Inland Marine (Heavy Equipment) in the amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence, $2,000,000 aggregate. • Insurance notifications shall be sent to the rtiwtioil,ai-ities—Partie by certified mail, return receipt requested. 16.Invalidity of Particular Provisions If any term of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall to any extent, be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable,shall not be affected thereby and each term and provision of this Agreement shall be valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 17.No Assignment No Party shall assign,transfer,convey,sublet or otherwise dispose of this Agreement,or any of its right, title or interest therein, or its power to execute this Agreement, to any other person or corporation, except for the purposes described herein, without prior consent in writing by all Parties,and any attempt to do any of the foregoing without such consent shall be of no effect. 18.No Modification No modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless written in the form of an Addendum or Amendment signed by all parties. 19.Law Provisions All provisions as required by Law are hereby deemed inserted. The Parties agree that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed so as to interfere with or diminish any local government authority. 20.Entire Agreement It is expressly agreed that this instrument represents the entire agreement of the mrtuH-ieipakitics Parties and that all previous understandings are merged in this Agreement. This Agreement shall take effect and be legally binding upon each Party upon its execution hereof. CAC Sepki lbw 13,2012 VIII-a Raisaitillsiffelleports 46 of 510 of 10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the parties hereto have set their hands and seal the date and year first above written. FOR THE COUNTY: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA, By: ,Deputy Clerk Fred W.Coyle,Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Colleen M.Greene Assistant County Attorney I FOR THE CITY TOWN: A 1 PEST: £Il l OwN OF LONGBOAT KEY PATRICIA.l CiRAN(3l'.R,TOWN CLERK By 1) tC1ci£1 Ci r'311 ui',l ilt'VI7 Clerk Dave 7:3UllCrCkTi3wn 11'I allflkrri Formatted:Indent Left 0",First line: 0", ~— Widow/Orphan control,Tab stops: 0.57',Left Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David P low)Atiorncry 8 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 47 of 51 Z Great Lakes 2122 York Road Dredge&Dock Oak Brook,lumo!s 60523 a Company 630.574 3000 1 November 2011 J. Gary McAlpin, Director Coastal Zone Management 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Gary, Re: Upcoming Beach Projects Thanks for taking time to meet with Sam Morrison, our Area Manager and me at the FSBPA conference. It is always good to see you. I wanted to reiterate some of the constructability comments we shared during that discussion which also included the folks from Captiva as well as Steve Keehn from CPE. 1. Mobilization Savings. For sure,one of the biggest costs on a large scale dredging project is mobilization. We often encourage our clients and consulting engineer friends to combine similar projects whenever possible to allow for cost efficiencies, Based on our past experiences and your anticipated plans, combining projects with the Captiva Erosion Control District appears to be the right thing to do As we discussed, there are no hard and fast numbers to apply, but with mobilization costs in the general in the range of $2,000,000 to$5,000,000 per project there are certainly significant cost savings to be realized. 2. Environmental Windows.Working around the turtle windows can result in significant cost savings also. Most of the industry's annual hopper dredge work gets compressed into the winter months by Federal budget delays and endangered species issues. This impacts our costs not only by increased scheduling pressures, but also puts the work into the more difficult weather months when working in the ocean becomes more dangerous and costly. Our industry typically has our best equipment availability in the summer months and as a result, the Corps and other clients look to schedule whatever projects that have such flexibility for those months when costs are reduced and schedules are more reliable. 3. Scheduling. Flexibility is always important for a vessel operator,like a hopper dredging company. There are two ways for you to show that flexibility and win favorable pricing. One is to bid the project with sufficient lead time to allow the contractor to get his support equipment(pipeline,etc)to the job site on a reasonable schedule. What is important for this point is that it is not critical when the work starts, it is more important when it ends. If you have scheduling issues, identify them, but provide flexibility wherever you can. In line with that, the second way is to provide as much completion time as possible and then not object to the contractor performing other projects often called'opportunity projects". While it is difficult to quantify the cost benefits to you upfront, we can tell you that we do lower our prices for those projects on the order of 5%to 20%when such flexibility is allowed. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 48 of 51 Gary McAlpin 1 November 2011 4. Partnering.One of the best things you can have with industry is a good relationship. While in any given contract or project there may be issues and conflict, in a perpetual business like ours,we have to assure each other's success. Engaging us in the conversation upfront is valuable to us on a lot of levels as we hope it is for you. You have always been straight with us and that has allowed us to put our best price on the table. Good luck as this project moves forward,we look forward to working with you again. Please don't hesitate to contact Sam or I with other questions or comments. Regards Great Lakes Dredge&Dock Company William H. Hanson Vice President CC:Sam Morrison,GLDD CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 49 of 51 mum Memorandum To: Gary From: Rick Cc: Date: 10/6/11 Re: Captiva/Collier Beach Work Following is a brief recap of my thoughts regarding the joint construction of the beaches at Captive Island and Naples, FL. 1) Both projects require a very sizeable amount of pipeline to place the sand. The hopper dredging contractors that will bid on this work are "national" in nature and will need to bring pipeline to your area from distant parts of the country. This is an expensive endeavor, so it would certainly be fiscally responsible to do it once. A single contract would generate a sizeable mobilization and demobilization savings. 2) There are 9 hopper dredges in the U.S. industry that have pumpout capability. There are two others that can't pumpout, totaling 11 in the industry's fleet. The"turtle window" is that period when turtles are not in the area of a project. It is approximately 1 November through 30 April for offshore areas north of Jacksonville, FL, and 1 November through 31 March for offshore areas south of Jacksonville, FL. It is typical that there is 1,500 to 2,000 dredge days programmed (bid) for the "window". This is in addition to the 300 to 500 days that are remaining from various summer projects. Summer occupancy is approximately 2/3 of that during the window, so equipment is much more available during that time, increasing competition for your project and lowering the price. 3) Following number 2 above, in order to take advantage of available summer dredges, you must bid your work with enough lead time to allow the Contractor to fit it around other projects with a less flexible schedule. Short bid periods and short show-up times will limit your responses and your competition. You should bid your work 6 months before the "drop dead" start date. 4) Following number 3 above, don't prevent the Contractor from starting during the window if market conditions have decreased the number of"window" dredge days to such an extent that dredges are available. WEEKS MARINE WOW Dredging Division 985-875-2500 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 50 of 51 Keehn, Stephen From: Henry Schorr<HSchorr @mansonconstruction.com> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:51 PM To: Keehn, Stephen Subject: RE: FSBPA: Collier County and Captiva Island Joint Project Discussion With Great Lakes Stephen A quick review of the plans leads me to the following comments Pipeline lengths are quite long as you explained There is quite a bit of shell in material-this means higher horsepower to move material through pipe If this project could be done in May to October timeframe it would likely be cheaper because Lower Dredge utilization means contractors are looking for work Less weather impacts particularly during setup and breakdown of long sublines Less weather means less beach losses to account for lower cost Less delay to project for weather-lower cost Project could be"piggybacked"onto end of another project-less setup cost(just move pipeline from previous project and not have to disassemble) Widening pipeline corridors would alleviate some risk of damage to nearby coral A few areas have a thin beach-the wider beach (more cy/ft)results in less beach loss and lower cost. If borrow area depths can be kept consistent it helps dredge efficiency Make sure plenty of material is available in accessible water depth-have to manipulate dredge to find material costs money Rehandling areas make for a good alternative Keep all pipelines, including beach line,as short as possible-this increases production and lowers cost. If trawling is required to work in summer do it.A trawler is cheap compared to impacts from working in the winter Same thing with relocating turtle nests Give the contractor as much flexibility as possible-where to start, how to progress,etc.-this lowers cost Combining both projects should result in savings-short mob without many contingencies-but let contractor dictate order of work Make sure there is sufficient,wide and close beach access for land operations Keep turbidity monitoring to daylight only Hope these comments help. Let me know if you want to talk some more about it. Henry Original Message From: Keehn,Stephen [mailto:Stephen.Keehn @shawgrp.com] Sent:Thursday,September 15,2011 11:11 AM To: Henry Schorr Subject: Fw: FSBPA:Collier County and Captiva Island Joint Project Discussion With Great Lakes See attached joint project description Original Message From:Steve Keehn (mailto:Skeehn @coastalplanning.net] Sent:Sunday,September 11,2011 05:47 PM To: Keehn,Stephen 1 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-a New Business 51 of 51 ATTACHMENT 5 Capital Plan for Beach Projects CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-b New Business 1 of 15 FY 2013-14 Local Government Funding Request Project Name: South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project Description: This project includes the yearly physical beach monitoring, beach tilling, and turtle/shorebird monitoring leading to beach nourishment and improved structures in 2013/2014. All the monitoring activities are required by the FDEP permit. Collier County plans to place approximately 95,000 cubic yards of beach compatible material to restore approximately 2,600 feet along South Marco Island (R-146 to G-4). The beach fill will be within the 2005 permitted project limits. The main goals of the upcoming renourishment project are for restoring storm protection, natural resource habitats, and recreational beach areas to offset the storm damage caused by Tropical Storm Fay in 2008. The beach renourishment project is scheduled to go to construction in winter 2012. Plans are currently being prepared for the structural repair of the five existing erosion control structures scheduled for 2013/14. The design project life for the recent nourishment is between six to eight years. Project Location: The South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Project is located on the southwest Florida coastline of Collier County between Florida Department of Environmental Protection monuments R-143 and beyond R-148 to the terminal groin. The project's borrow area is the 1997/2007 Caxambas Pass Borrow Area. A supplemental borrow area is the Cape Romano Shoal. Use of Requested Program Funds: Funds requested for FY13/14 will be used for re- construction of the five existing erosion control structures and for re-environmental and physical monitoring of the 2012/2013 renourishment project as required by permits. Additionally, this funding request is for 2012/13 reimbursement for work to be started in the near future. Local Government Support Does this sponsor have dedicated support staff whose sole priority is to manage beach erosion control activities? Yes Name Title Email Percent Commitment Gary McAlpin Director,Coastal Zone GaryMcAlpin @colliergov.net 100% Management Address 1: 3301 East Tamiami Trail Phone: 239-252-2966 W.Harmon Turner Bldg., Suite 103 Address 2: Naples,Florida 34112 Fax: 239-252-2950 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-13 New Business 2 of 15 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Quarterly Report Compliance: 2012-2013 End Date Report Sent Compliant Qtr 1 (Sept) Sept. 30 N Qtr 2 (Dec) Dec. 31 N Qtr 3 (Mar) Mar. 31 N Qtr4 (June) June 30 N How will revenue for the local funding cost share be established? Local funding for the project will be obtained by Collier County through a Tourist Development Tax. This provides a dedicated long term funding source through a `bed tax'. Collier County levies a four (4%) percent Tourist Development Tax on all rental income received from accommodations rented for six months or less. The four-percent (4%) Tourist Development Tax revenue is allocated by the Tourist Development Plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners as follows: 50% for beach park facilities and beach improvement, maintenance, renourishment, restoration and erosion control, including pass and inlet maintenance shoreline protection, enhancement, cleanup or restoration of inland lakes and rivers to which there is public access as these uses relate to the physical preservation of the beach, shoreline or inland lake or river. 13.4% for County owned or operated museums, to acquire, construct, extend, enlarge, remodel, repair, improve, maintain, operate or promote one or more county owned museums and for non- County owned museums that are owned and operated by not-for- profit organizations and open to the public. 36.6%for Advertising/Promoting and Special Events to bring tourism to Collier County. Is the funding from a dedicated long term source for this project? Yes Collier County has dedicated the majority of the Tourist Taxes to beach maintenance, including funding projects within Marco Island. The funding was approved by referendum (see attached). Collier County has a dedicated staff. In order to acquire funding, a resolution from the local governmental entity must be provided by the application deadline which declares: • Support from the Sponsor for the Proposed Project • Willingness to serve as the Local Sponsor • Ability to provide the full Local Cost Share • Funding Source Has the local sponsor resolution been attached to the application fulfilling all of these requirements? It will be provided shortly. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-b New Business 3 of 15 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—South Marco Island Beach Renourishment This project is detailed in Collier County's 10-year Capital Plan for Beach Projects which has been approved by Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Has the State cost-shared in a feasibility or design phase of this project? Yes Previous State Cost Share percentage 20.88% 10-Year Project Schedule and 5-Year Estimated Budget Does this project have Congressional Authorization? No Does this project have a Federal Project Cooperative Agreement? No What is the end date of the Federal Authorization? n/a Federal cost share available for this erosion control project: 75% Marco Island Beach has FEMA Category G funds due to damage as a result of Tropical Storm Fay. This has been included within the 5-year estimated budget under the Federal Cost Share column at 75%of eligible cost. Schedule and Budget (Include estimated phases for 10 years and estimated project costs for 5 years.): Total Proposed Federal Cost State Cost Local Cost Year Description Estimated Method Share Share Share Cost Monitoring Phys, Turtle $77,386 $0 $26,536 $50,850 2013/2014 Construction Renourishment $1,701,000 $200,000 $514,693 $986,307 Erosion Control Construction Structures $1,234,000 $0 $423,139 $810,861 2014/2015 Monitoring Phys,Turtle $78,233 $0 $26,826 $51,407 2015/2016 Monitoring Phys,Turtle $79,098 $0 $27,123 $51,975 2016/2017 Monitoring Phys,Turtle $79,980 $0 $27,425 $52,555 2017/2018 Monitoring Phys,Turtle $80,880 $0 $27,734 $53,146 2018/2019 Monitoring Phys, Turtle 2019/2020 Monitoring Phys, Turtle 2020/2021 Monitoring Phys, Turtle 2021/2022 Monitoring Phys, Turtle 2022/2023 Monitoring Phys, Turtle *Construction is anticipated to occur in fall-winter 2012. Funds for this project are being requested as a reimbursement for project costs Regional and Economic Benefits CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-b New Business 4 of 15 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Length of Project Boundary in Feet: 2,681 ft Length of commercial or recreational property fronting the project shoreline: 1,473 ft Percentage of project shoreline designated as commercial or recreational property 54.96% Eligibility: Access Points and Public Lodging Establishments: Project Boundary: R-146 to G-4 Approximate Shoreline Length: 2,681' Public Access Parking Spaces Swallow Avenue (Secondary Access) 72 (on site) Qualifying Hotels Qualifying Shoreline Cape Marco Property Owners 1,473 Licenses for the above hotels are attached. Area determined to be publicly accessible Total Length 20' north of R146 to R148+600 1,880' (1,860' within project area) Area determined to be critically eroded R143 to R148 1,838 ft Total eligible shoreline length: 1,838 Total adjusted shoreline length: 2,681 Percent eligible for State funding: 68.58% State eligibility incorporates the total project length(critical and non-critical)and eligibility only recognizes publicly accessible critically eroded shoreline. See attached map of eligible shorelines. Additional Ranking Criteria Will this project enhance or increase the longevity of a previously- constructed project? An engineering analysis is fine tuning and rehabilitating structures to increase durability and sand retention on the island,which will increase project life. Yes Will this project nourish a previously restored shoreline? Yes CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-13 New Business 5 of 15 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Rate of Erosion as determined by the Bureau based on long term data (ft/yr) 7.2 ft/yr Severity of Erosion: The project area's shoreline has been designated by FDEP as critically eroded. Using the January 2007 and February 2011 monitoring surveys, the MHW shoreline change was found to be eroding at an average rate of-7.2 feet per year. Threat to Upland Structures: Only awarded to new projects for shorelines that have not been restored. Project Benefits: 1,475 linear feet (31.38%) of the Marco Island Beach property is zoned commercial or recreational. This includes Cape Marco and a public access point with parking across the street. Periodic dredging has taken place at Caxambas Pass. The total volume of sand dredged and hydraulically pumped to the adjacent beach from Caxambas Pass since 1990 is estimated at 800,000 cubic yards. Though Collier County has no federally designated sea turtle refuges, loggerhead sea turtles nest throughout the county, and this project will enhance those opportunities. Beach tilling will directly support turtle nesting by decreasing beach sand compaction. Use of Innovative Applications of Existing Technologies: Improvements to the combined breakwater and groin system at the south end of the project area are being investigated for improvements to control sand being lost off the south end of the island. This investigation is being completed through a computer modeling study. It will increase the project life. Project Performance: The last nourishment occurred in 2007 and the upcoming renourishment is planned for 2012. Nourishment Interval(years): 6-8 years Is this project being planned or constructed in cooperation with another local government? Explain? Yes Collier County and the City of Marco Island are jointly sponsoring this project. The project combines beach nourishment with inlet dredging. All county monitoring, including the two cities, is combined for economy. Mitigation of Inlet Impacts: The Marco Island project is nourished in synergy with maintaining Caxambas Pass for navigation. The type of project is widely practiced in North Carolina and New Jersey, and it is economical and reduces cumulative environmental impacts. This practice meets the objective of the Strategic Beach Management Plan. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-b New Business 6 of 15 Collier County Long Range Budget Plan FY 13/14—South Marco Island Beach Renourishment Technologies New to Florida: None Regionalization: This is a joint Collier County and Marco Island project. Project Significance: The project is 2,681 feet long or 0.508 miles Readiness: The County has Tourist Development Council funding dedicated to this project. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-b New Business 7 of 15 ATTACHMENT 1 Basis for Local Funding and Project Maps CAC September 13,2012 Vlll-2-b New Business 60115 / ` Paz , Legend: ,, Ili QPublic Beach Access 8 Parking �s :6' Projed Boundaries fit`' {^ till C *. , - QCommemial � f ,,,,3Recreational .:...tad; ,„, ',OIL /�/Crhical Erosion Area u }rt R - •A FDEP Monuments }� Noea:Ill 't 5" 1.Coordinates are in feet based on the Florida R 143 State Plane Coordinate System,East Zone , North American Datum of 1963.(NAD63). ' }s w �' 2.Date of Aerial Photography:January 3,2012. ' �` 3.Publicly-Owned Property and Beach Hotels ' and Resort Condos based on the ,7 t ;.; ,p. 2012 parcels provided by the '", Collier County GIS Department �- -� -` �. :u , ,. " 4 , law , , .. 1 Y y tiw Ilk 1 R 144 . d i I ' ..psi „} L �,, 1 ? ate' lr- t Gulf ''''° O w ` 4,- ,wA of f � ' Mexico ' 676000 � _ ^:, !d!` 1 x' r.±� .1 14 t s X1 $µ li i � f f dam{ �� _ PS ,� �. y5 r '. 1 '« 1, e''',,''' sii 1 R#1� : 8147 �. � ,, f 4 ,' I ,41.. - s„ 3• . � y CY r 5 j 5. 'i 3 �e � A .,; L 11 , 1mo.I lit P k51 Cape Property 674000 ir �� ' q Cz7i,„P4ANNINGa a. G2 ,s yNGINEuR^NG'IC c Collier County Beach Long Range Beach Plan kill South Marco Segment 0 275 550 Feet a ..MO. 1 Inch=550 feet _ v CAC September 13,2012 VII I-2-b New Business 9 of 15 ATTACHMENT 2 Hotel Licenses and Property Information DBPR-BELIZE AT CAPE MARCO, A CONDO, Condominium Project CAC Septembpr42p11f 1 VIII-2-b New Busetess 10 of 15 2:29:33 PM 8/23/2012 Licensee Details Licensee Information Name: BELIZE AT CAPE MARCO, A CONDO (Primary Name) (DBA Name) Main Address: 970 CAPE MARCO DRIVE MARCO ISLAND Florida 33937 County: COLLIER License Mailing: LicenseLocation: License Information License Type: Condominium Project Rank: Condo Project License Number: PR1G025964 Status: Approved,Recorded Licensure Date: 07/03/2001 Expires: 01/01/2013 Special Qualifications Qualification Effective Group • View Related License Information View License Complaint View Additional Information 1940 North Monroe Street,Tallahassee Ft.32399:: Email. Customer Contact Center::Customer Contact Center. 850.487.1395 The State of Florida is an AA/EE0 employer.Copyright 2007-2010 State of Florida.Privacy statement Under Flor■da lam:,email addresses are public records.If you do not want)roux emari address released in response to a public-records request,do not send electronic mall to this entity.Instead,contact the office by phone or by traditional mail.If you have any questions,please contact 850 487.1.395..Pursuant to Section 455.275(1),Florida Statutes;effective October 1,2012,licensees licensed under Chapter 455,F.S.must provide the Department with an email address If they have one.The mails provided may be used for official communication with the licensee However email addresses are public record.If you do not wish to supply a personal address,please provide the Department with an email address which can be made available to the public.Please see our Chapter ASS page to determine if you are affected by this change. https://www.myfloridalicense.com/LicenseDetail.asp?SID=&id=73449A1 C4E8DAE4A3B... 8/23/2012 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-b New Business 11 of 15 ATTACHMENT 3 TDT Vote CAC September 13,2012 FROM : ELECTIONS OFFICE FAX NO. : 941-774-9459 Jun. 0°CAC3NaR lEalabiss F3 12 of 15 P12 1 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION Collier County,Florida-November 3,1992 _ "' '�t`S�'.e. +:'i1tre�w,._. -� stN-,•Ry$,b"Fuw+P� (: :i ,00, =Also .mss 10e#00 <al d REFERENDUM ELECTION TO APPROVE THE LEVY OF 2%TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX SHALL COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO 92-90 BE APPROVED TO LEVY,IMPOSE ANO SET A TWO PERCENT TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX ON EACH DOLLAR OF THE TOTAL RENT CHARGED ON ANY LIVING QUARTERS OR ACCOMMODATIONS IN ANY HOTEL MOTEL RESORT,APARTMENT. ROOMING HOUSE,MOBILE HOME PARK,RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK,OR CONDOMINIUM FOR A TERM OF SIX MONTHS OR LESS FOR FINANCING BEACH RENOURISHMENT ANC MAINTENANCE, AND TO PROMOTE AND ADVERTISE TOURISM? • YES FOR THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX 219-* NO AGAINST THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX 220- I STRAW BALLOT SHALL THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS VOTE TO LEVY AN ADDITIONAL CENT TO THE ORIGINAL TWO PERCENT TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX ON EACH DOLLAR OF THE RENT CHARGED ON ANY LIVING QUARTERS OR ACCOMMODATIONS IN ANY HOTEL,MOTEL,RESORT,APARTMENT, ROOM:NGHCUSE,MOBILE HOME PARK,RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK,OR CONDOMINIUM FOR A TERM OF SIX MONTHS OR LESS IN ORDER TO PAY DEBT SERVICE ON BONDS ISSUED TO FINANCE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL FRANCHISE FAC'LITY? YES 226-* NO 227-O CouNrrNIDE I CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-b New Business �1 15 • = 1) CI) Fa a E4 6) J ._- 3--.3 -21--4 Q ‘p 6 0-_,,,__' gek--... *, = 2 ,ir. . ...... : - E. A N G'� io 4) 4) r• Co Cs ti CI 4.„ • Z • V ./caczer-wv . . . .. . _ . .... • CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-b New Business E u C E in 0 14 of 1g _ J o p q C C y co cl E.. J • .ti. u E o O - Q L O . ' .0° C 0._ 3 h co ' u Oc37". C tn O V= E 0 o+ z a cea . � s C i 8 c a 0 O O V X O O ca Co f. a E cJ C V J O. L r. 1 L 00 .0 0.n 'O u .2 ° 0O 0 `� t. .c G 0 C . O 'G V v-r' 7 4J R C � C C. Q tec a 3 a 0 o O E E. c o C C o Z ° o o ° E � c 0 F W -• . c y y a _°. o `: 0 ►-� o a0J c 0 0 ea c G w c c V gn E-y 0 0 w p h 0% V E O .°. C u 17 V V y •� R ....� . c"_ — �O c. O� V O 0. V "O E i°. O L Til t. C ei O u. pu r 'Q. 5 - c., ,r, y C O L a at 4) . O ' ' A . in ... 0...▪ 0 C 0 .0 C O L ... C3 R. e L � _ 0 -O C .+ c § S 0 E .. ' O t E cu V O > C 'C V y O O O co°J O O 6J O 1... O O p y 0 'O '0 Z R V 0 5 z : E'+ V) .0 Fa ... o i.. .0 0 e. at as O En.0 0 '0 V C▪ = cs > 8 C O u to ... • aft c_. ..1.1 �.. E C o o s R•� u y u � C °0. E co a 0 o 0 °• I. a a � E 2 ..a G C C 0 V U 0 •C %p N V ,1 0 O -F, y .O O. GA y O L O ^ V o y 0 u u V � 6y C x 2 L 8 E to t 0 •7.� 'a D k 0 O , C po u ° a � o C .-t w y � eg � O 0 GI u o a o � c C o U ' E �m a.0 E 5 s o = A o W1... o 0.8 O J G.�• O L C� .w � ' 0 o. '- 0 U � O w v i _ �•p 0 O • 0 C e Q C O C o c 0 c u E.. ° . c � . 3 O V a G t' C . ° 7 •p VR a V y a, .O Q - G v R a , v, o 'C 0 g C N G 0 .� 0 pp CC ,2 u QQcs 0 >° C C .s l•+ ^ �' O 0 .0 0 G V co 0 O .0 L 'O CO � E Q V V U 0 o O V r O L R C 0 C p O O V .2 y .+ ea 03 u e 0 g - p_ E a u G °' 'v R 10 _ Q ° 3 0� ilI _ N ,E 3U >+ a., v u .. C E S �° GVJ 0 0 y u O �r .y�G > r �+ O °J " to C C ��-.S o O ti. .. ..o c ' O a� 'p .Z e 'C ° H o 'C 'fl at C •3 C 0 ° '= co V as lit�" g1o 'o° rac. a � ovyEH °' �' 0a c ° E ,� 8 E o o as a •e� r� ? °' -[ a ._' ° 9 a) 3 jp� ~ ... sL°• p t� V 0 tin .0 y 0.... C �+ ..T of 0 - .0 G. E .o a� U C/] U J ° a O h o. V ^ u v y 'D c t. o C aJ - 0 = ,..2 ''.' E " .� 'fit = ° 1,. ' S 'E E o ,c E rcd' -a c ,., o N o °a -3 7+ ►,� 0. ° ° CD CS ''• > c o u; ° in 4.. CO E ° o L o V 0 D. C QIA $ o ,E .. 0 c a 3 E o c nJ .o "c3 '- o 0 u Z 2. c°.. E > E 7 °J o u - o L o .° * 0 ° ` o E E a a E a e o s E ° x x 4. �' .� U V .°. o ego p c. x o c ��, O 0 0 .� v, O in ;d :Q § 0 v „•r to G E is v .O 0. -0' V ^ vl n o > �"" U .O E a... t„ ....0 O u ca c O ^� L °CJ n C 0 c . 4 — C y c �•' $ O�,J ° U .'L.. •p v� O t;,) a't.°.. a' Cp C.•• C°.J 0 o.o 3 G O -c ►:•. c t 60 O G % G to to .� 41, W _.. a o E c a.o c cu 4"4 - =-J - a, i ° E 3 b w a tv ° O O �. y 4l N �• ._ ►�i o a 3 O 0 , 1 > .o 'g O o E v t 's E o s 0 ° a .0 p i' ° },.` 0 L .a aJ O ^ — V E °J Z ° V O -- - ° a. ;- 3 -a a e a.a r .� 3 Es0cl .° w � = a•.6 3U E as C.) o. 3 .. E- a In CAC September 13,2012 VIII-2-b New Business 15 of 15 • w M d bb -0 -0 b •a -0,1""0 -a ti '(� 13;•c a i U•CO co _ : 6 o a7• - d N 1 N. a) al N'w!a7 a) I.@'l' I di y' " "•il, VI (0 U.l ,N R7,R7 (0 :Rt (t71 fD (o (C)'(CI c (0 A mu'•ft!I(i 1(i L,ly;lL' m j '.n0 7•' y A ` 0. I c O � O•O co Q�I�I.itO'.OL`- N rIN r co!O OC[)i -'c4 (D (D'•- w (n• - i 0 u-.) N;1 -• -; O r- r l O --; z' • ,C,7i•� Co'Co O In Mlco;co,coIln O (`') t'7IN!(p!c0'(5ao1(:I (li O Z` !.q.!v N co N N NI ir' .r r e-: :r, ■ IC nC);N;I) CO;N1e- OOpp ��ppp r) c' ,n L1).- O's C*):CD Cr);M:0 C))'Q;N T•- r- O u O 0 �'w 0'0,141' r- r•-•,1.0 I co,*�• GN, a' I^ C�;1� �a�.tt r: (� OILOCD to CA' - c7��' co 1,.:'- -- tem I C y j (p r:li INN 1- N:,O'.N- NiI-:s-IN'N I�.1- to i I , J 1 I i W 'c - • I Z v c v. I _Q N 1 E , U ° 0- 100` • I• J W IN:� - • I • E 4 c. «i• 1.5! 1:_s:o • c'D W [=. of I ;v I Ca) - g.tl °.Y : - I a) f o c 4A ra Z 3 I z i(AI aaj. -. DI I� S j` O c '-{ T' y o 00 v 1 Z; I "gym o1E' I : 2.2'C.) 1 �� x � t. a, C:Q m ' Ei 4: In '0 aav V ,_ Z'v o, O. ,$!cn c E Ic' (t 1co B' a aI .o'• ccI m 6.P c ;p Ix c ? x' x :� o,o v'v) c > a x g a ' ; f ,ooi � c .. -1 U I� o dc - I- • o 0c o:m • � = a < "W ; J t � I R E" V. 5.c, x !co Q v! ' N '!-- .- CCIh, 1` L -0 CUIa) (0. 1-C ClX ,� � 1� RI r% .5 f tY i`L1 �? 'a o 5.E'El- y :.g; , N -0 a'J " 0∎02x',0 c1p x 5: !Q -0IE U m a) E o o 1 o:o. > a � l � aI o'-' id; ),(u. w. 0iilio;� o>:tl .ci "ce Cc z l t 5, c Lu . a) a) v)l U`S•N IA .. a, .- !CNO i 0� N'`� . U 4 1 is u,1'..;c -Ca,',c D v,O �i.W u-:— c x. a n x o c _l i IN.CA O ' � 'a : OI 0 . m,� a. LL CY' LL•J • -e I)if- 1- v.Ul` ,t, o.o E,o - { '- a, i le a0Ic mix, m:- N ,V a' v nE, E'`o ail a. M e 3Q i oe t c;o f '�. 'g U a) o o s '6 Q • ---,- ,0:u:0.0 O�c0 0!v,0,U.c.) v!vlc.010 0 � 1- (; a ix of 76I O I l ! I! ) - iI ap e O O,tAiN N NIOIO'm!001�-'SIN+N.O,O,. (D CD 1n [tIQ 0 O M O I CA CA fA l0 00 c 00; C10.C10. C7 „ K' v �i i , , , , , 1A100ICAl , I ,� I I IC C.0 t� I�I� ti: O 6, R, LA U) c�•M M O Co 4. 16 (.0 M:N, �,r:c4 CV•EN to (n u), , I -tll e� r Ir r (7'T e- (� ,-I t" (� . I. ...., . : I v- N'"'" ek.e- 3- , '1.- al en. r 1 . 9-, 1- 1.I ' ` I ■ . .„ I • cr l lo l OBsd PIoisueyC oii.u+oaj Et:67..Atl le 66,W it/ 7TtW <- anti n cun••eari 'wvos•n '.,,.. ∎• ••,' £(E a ed ;cc aor i,d?1:? 80 ''C 80 IEEB£t'91b6 ..IAH �q llaag CAC September 13,2012 VIII-3 New Business m 4.1 :. 1 of 9 ct: CPE V. mow ,'��ry 143561 September 12,2012 Gary McAlpin Collier County Government W. Harmon Turner Bldg. Naples,FL 34112 Subject: Scope of Work under Contract No.10-5572 Plan,Specification and Construction Services Phase Task Order for Wiggins Pass Permitting,Modeling&Inlet Management Dear Gary: This scope of work covers plans and specification development and the construction services phase of the Wiggins Pass Dredging Project for 2013. The work covers preparation of a draft biological opinion for FAY'S, site visits to the project area, and during construction assistance in support of the County inspection team. It also includes a final site visit, verification of pay volumes, preparation of a post-construction report, and certification of the project. The scope of work, rate sheet, and fee proposal for the work is labeled as Exhibits 1-3, respectively. The fee is based on time and materials not to exceed$56,471. If you have any questions regarding this scope of work,please call me. Sincerely, COASTAL PLANN NG&ENGINEERING, INC. -rphen eehn,P. Se -• '.as tal Engineer cc: Nicole Sharp,P.E.,CPE Sheri Dindial,CPE 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A SHAW GROUP COMPANY CAC September 13,2012 VIII-3 New Business 2 of 9 Authorized Corporate Signature Printed Name Title CLIENT: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Acknowledgement and Acceptance: Authorized Representative Signature Printed Name Title Date f:marketing/proposals/fl counties/collier/2012/wp construction../cover letter cc wp plans,spec.... 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A SHAW GROUP COMPANY CAC September 13,2012 VIII-3 New Business 3 of 9 Exhibit 1 Scope of Work 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A SHAW GROUP COMPANY CAC September 13,2012 VIII-3 New Business 4 of 9 Exhibit 1 Scope of Work under Contract No. 10-5572 Plan,Specification and Construction Services Phase Wiggins Pass Permitting,Modeling & Inlet Management This proposal is for coastal engineering services for dredging of Wiggins Pass. This proposal is based upon the approval of the pending permit applications to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. This scope assumes that the plans and specification will be based on the permit sketches and project description described in the permit application currently on file (September 2012) with FDEP and effort will be limited to the time shown in the Fee Proposal on a T&M NTE basis. A. Plans and Specifications The construction plans will include plan views and cross-sections sufficient for the construction of the channel dredging project. The plans will provide survey control information which will allow the contractor to control and construct the channel. The spoil site will be delineated within the disposal locations allowed by FDEP and USACE permit conditions. The plans will be based on the 2012 SDI survey and previous plans and specification. The disposal area will be positioned to minimize channel shoaling. Specifications developed for the project will include: Technical Specifications with Environmental Protection Summary. We will integrate the QA/QC plan and permit conditions into the work. The Engineer will provide plans and specifications in Acrobat and Word format. We will submit two copies of the plans and specifications to FDEP and request the Notice to Proceed. The quantities will be based on the 2012 SDI survey. B. Prepare Biological Opinion The US Fish and Wildlife Service has promised to accelerate the development of a Biological Opinion needed for a federal permit if the County prepares a draft BO. Using a FWS supplied template for the Biological Opinion suitable to the Southwest coast of Florida, a draft Biological Opinion will be prepared. C. Bidding,Award,and Pre-Bid/Contractor Meeting CPE will assist the County in the selection of a dredge contractor for the inlet dredging project. CPE will attend the pre-bid meeting by phone, and will prepare a simple one page addendum if needed. We will assist the County in reviewing the bids. CPE will provide a recommendation concerning the selection of the contractor. D. Construction Observations CPE attend the pre-construction meeting for the inlet dredging project organized by the County. An overview of the project and scope of work will be presented along with a review of the CAC September 13,2012 VIII-3 New Business 5 of 9 construction methodology, technical specifications and the schedule. The permits will also be reviewed and discussed. During this phase, the cuts and volumes will be updated by CPE using the contractor's before dredge survey. The pre-, during and post construction surveys will be prepared by the contractor. A CPE engineer will advise County observers on technical matters. The inspection team will be led by County personal, who will be responsible for reviewing all the contractor's daily progress and quality control reports, including turbidity and dredge positioning reports. The County will be responsible to place those reports in the appropriate format and forwarded them to the FDEP weekly and at the end of the project in compliance with permit requirements. The CPE observer will attend two weekly meetings. Payment requests and survey data will be reviewed and recommendations for payment will be made by CPE twice during construction. E. Post-Construction Report and Certification CPE will develop and submit the post-construction engineering report to the FDEP within 90 days following completion of the post-construction survey, as required by the permit. The contractor will provide the bulk of information for the report. The report will address compliance with the plans and specifications, and adherence to the applicable permit and approval conditions. The report will be based on the contractor's post-construction survey, which CPE will use to verify dredge volume for final payment. Project closeout and final certification will be completed for the inlet dredging project. Following notification by the Contractor that construction activities are deemed to be complete, the County will inspect the construction areas along with any staging areas used. If applicable, the county will develop a punch list of items unfinished and presented it to the contractor. A final certification of the project will be prepared by CPE, with input for the County inspectors. CPE will provide a written statement of completion and provide the construction completion certification to the regulatory agencies based`on contractor and county supplied information. G. Contingency—Construction Issues/Permit Issues/Modifications This task addresses project engineering and environmental contingencies, based on the assumption described above. Additional time sensitive engineering, environmental, or permit requirement may be identified prior to or during construction. This task can cover these requirements as they occur and should be approved by the County as part of the contract. Any work under this task shall be a notice to proceed item. f:marketing/proposals/fl counties/collier/2012/wp construction.../wiggins pass construction services scope of work 090712 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-3 New Business 6of9 Exhibit 2 Rate Sheet 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A SHAW GROUP COMPANY CAC September 13,2012 VIII-3 New Business 7of9 Attachment I Contract# 10-5572 Wiggins Pass Permitting, Modeling and Inlet Management Standard Hourly Rate Schedule for all disciplines •Personnel Category Standard Hourly Rate Principal�......_.. .... .. 5195, Senior Project Manager $165 Project Manager $148 ;Senior Engineer $155: Engineer $119: I Senior ins ector • P $85: •Junior Engineer $s5; ;Inspector $65 r Senior Planner $140: Planner $110' !... ............._.J .... . _ . Modeler . - • 5110 • Junior Modeler $75 Senior Designer $115 Geologist/ Designer $100. EmAronmental Specialist $115 •Senior GlS Specialist; $145 ;CADD/GIS Specialist.$100`y .Intern $60 Clerical.._ .. $60' CADD Technician $85 .Survey Crew-2 man $130 :Survey Crew-3 man : $160 Survey Crew-4 man $180 This list is'not intended to be all-inclusive. Hourly rate fees for other categories of professional, support and other services shall be mutually negotiated by the County and Firm on a project by project basis as needed Please note: These rates apply to other Coastal Planning& Engineering, Inc. companies A) Coastal Planning & Engineering of North Carolina, Inc. B) Coastal Planning & Engineering of New York, PC C)Coastal Consultoria Ambiental Ltda. B-5 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-3 New Business 8 of 9 Exhibit 3 Fee Proposal 2481 NW BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 561.391.8102 • FAX 561.391.9116 • COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC., A SHAW GROUP COMPANY I CAC September 13,2012 VIII-3 New Business 9 of 9 EXHIBIT 3 FEE PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY HIOGINS PASS CHANNEL REALIGNMENT CONSTRUCTION SERVICES September 11,2012 (01BOR COSTS Senior Enwimnmentel Clerical Tag Item Cost Principal Project Senior Engineer Engineer Senior Marlin Senior GIS/CAD CAD GIS (Coeete0 (Coastal) Biologist Speclekat Specialist Technician Spacelet Book Travel Manager Propel BbioYlst keepr (Hours) (Noon) (Hour,) (Noun) (Hours) (Noun) (Hours) (Hours) (N0un) 1N00n) (3) PHASE I:PRE-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES A Plans end SpecNioaliona 3 19.310 1 12 60 8 3 28 12 B Design Analysis ant Refinement $ 4,972 8 28 2 2 C Coal EOM..Contractor Coordination,and COnatrucla0gity 3 3.712 16 8 2 D Prep,.Draft Biological Opinon per FWS direction 6 10.003 1 2 16 48 20 E Bidding.Award,and Pre-Bb Contractor Meeting Assistance $ 4.556 20 8 3304 PHASE II:DURING CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 6 - F Pre-Construction Meeting.Update Volumes and Cost Minimization 6 4.828 8 24 2 5 3152 E Construction Observations,Pay Volume McNsis and Technical Advise $ 24,582 28 154 7 $1,216 O Sand Semple Maylsis $ 1.200 , 5 $700 PHASE III:POST-CONSTRUCTION SERVICES $ • F Pos$Conalruction Report end Cer5lketion S 15.842 24 80 2 12 12 5152 PHASE IV:CONTINGENCY H Conknpency-Construction Issues/Permit lsauesIModif atlons 6 9.548 11 60 0 6808 Total Hours 4 1 127.9090909 0 424 24 48 5 49 20 40 62.280 Rate' 3195 3165 6155 $119 $130 3115 5145 3100 3100 $60 1.0 Cost• 6195 321.105 50 $50.458 63.120 55,520 5725 54.900 32.000 32.400 $2.280 0 LABOR 160,121 INDIRECT COST $2,260 PHASEI 6 37.663 PHASE II 350,110 PHASE III $16.842 TOTAL $92,701 PHASE IV 39,648 Fuwxridpwma.......Mra,17•ravRcomunmsa.trsv.P Fs R.av« CAC September 13,2012 VIII-4 New Business 1 of 2 August 30, 2012 J. Gary McAlpin Director, Coastal Zone Management 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 103 Olsen Naples, FL 34112 associates, inc. Coastal Engineering Re: Peer Review for Wiggins Pass Channel Improvements Dear Mr. McAlpin: Per your request, the following presents our firm's proposal to prepare a coastal engineering peer review of proposed alternatives to improve the navigation channel at Wiggins Pass, with specific reference to the plan proposed by CP&E in the current permit application. That plan, as described in the February 2010 submittal, principally involves straightening the flood shoal channel by dredging and disposal of sediment as a `sand dike' along the north bank, along with adaptive management for dredging and beach disposal of the outer, ebb shoal channel. Our understanding is that the primary project objectives are to decrease the magnitude and frequency of dredging requirements, maintain more reliable navigation, mitigate beach erosion along the adjacent north beach, and protect the estuarine resources. After briefly reviewing several of the documents you initially provided, it would appear that there are two principal -- somewhat divergent -- approaches proposed to improve the Pass. One involves hydraulic, non-structural control (dredging and sand dikes, as proposed), and the other involves littoral, structural control (with breakwaters, groins or jetties, etc.). There are, of course, also hybrid alternatives that might combine these approaches. Numerical models and engineering reports have been prepared by CP&E and Humiston & Moore (H&M) that describe the inlet and several non-structural alternatives. As requested, our firm's peer review would not replicate these models or analysis, nor otherwise conduct modeling or new data collection. Instead, our analysis would review the models' assumptions and calibration, sufficiency and thoroughness of the model runs, and the engineering conclusions from the model analysis. Our analysis and review would likewise include additional recommendations and observations regarding the risks and probable success of various project alternatives, based upon the existing model analysis and our firm's prior experience and knowledge of inlet hydraulics. In this regard, our approach would consist of reviewing in detail the recent reports by CP&E and H&M as provided by the County, along with the permit application and subsequent RAI. We would also need to obtain and review the existing Inlet Management Plan (and any draft or pending revisions thereto), the current maintenance dredging permit for the Pass, prior surveys and/or maintenance-dredge construction plans, and the Corps' 1980 Project Report, each assumed to be provided by the County. To review the model(s) and efficacy of the proposed solution(s), our review would seek to develop a working understanding of the occurrence and nature of historical and existing shdaling problems in the Pass, historical changes in the shorelines Olsen associates, inc. 1 2618 Herschel Street I Jacksonville, FL 32204 904.387 6114 I FAX 904.384.7368 www.olsen-assocmtes.com CAC September 13,2012 VIII-4 New Business 2 of 2 Mr. Gary McAlpin August 30, 2012 Wiggins Pass, Peer Review Page 2 of 2 and channel change (described in the existing reports and FDEP database), the inlet sediment budget, and the principal environmental constraints. Our review would be summarized in a brief written report that outlines our professional opinion regarding the adequacy and completeness of the modeling, the conclusions drawn from the modeling, uncertainties in the pt•edicted or probable performance of project alternatives, and related recommendations and observations regarding approaches to meet the project's objectives. The latter would likely include our opinion as to the potential adequacy, deficiencies, and/or advantages of a structural (littoral control) versus a non-structural (hydraulic) approach to the problem; or, at least, our opinion regarding potential deficiencies or advantages in each approach, and the probability of success (or uncertainty) in each approach. If relevant, we would take the liberty to proffer alternative actions or variations of those under consideration. Toward completion of this review, this proposal makes allowance for (1) a one-day initial site visit by the Principal Investigator to become directly familiar with the area, (2) informal discussions with the County and CP&E and H&M for briefings, (3) desk-top study of the relevant documents, (4) preparation and transmittal of the report, and (5) follow-up discussion and/or presentation, including allowance for a one-day meeting in Collier County if requested. The proposed fee for this effort would be$36,500K. The Principal Investigator and Project Manager would be Dr. Kevin Bodge, P.E., in collaboration with myself and the firm's staff. We anticipate that this effort would require 60 days after your authorization to proceed, to develop the peer review report. Please do not hesitate to contact me at eolsen @olsen-associates.com or 904-387-6114 if you have any questions regarding this submittal. Thank you for the opportunity to offer our firm's professional coastal engineering services. Sincerely, Erik J. Olsen, P.E. Principal Engineer olsen associates, inc. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-5 New Busines 1 of 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a six year design and permitting plan for the FY2013/14 Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples beach renourishment and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. OBJECTIVE: A six year design and permitting plan has been developed for the next major beach renourishment of the Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples beaches. Approval of the design and permitting plan is the next step in project development; is the critical path in project implementation and balances the project scope with the funds available. Staff is seeking concurrence and a recommendation to move forward with this six year design and permitting plan. CONSIDERATION: The BCC directed staff in the 2011 joint Collier County and City of Naples workshop to maximize the interval between major beach renourishments. Funding however, is currently only available for a six year beach renourishment design that duplicates the FY 2005/06 renourishment. This project is being scope managed and will consist of the following components: 1. Perform Emergency Truck Haul beach renourishments on the Vanderbilt and Naples Beaches for an estimated cost of approximately$650,000. The area covered would be from the La Playa(R26)to just north of the Ritz(R30)approximately 4,000 LF on Vanderbilt beach and in Naples from Lowdermilk Park(R61)to the Naples Golf and Beach Club(R63.5)or 2,500LF of beach. The beach will be elevated to the top of the scarp at the vegetation line. The beaches will be higher(1-2 feet)at the vegetation line and extend the entire width of the beach to the MHW line. The beaches cannot be made wider. The sand must have a turtle friendly slope(1:4)so the renourishment at both locations will be very limited. Preliminary estimates are 12,000 CY's at Vanderbilt and 12,000 CY's at Naples. Since sand is not placed in the water, a USACE permit is not required and an Emergency Renourishment with FDEP can take place. If this work begins in November,both locations can be completed by the first of the year. 2. Execute a modified 2005/2006 six year design by placing approximately 420,000 CY's of sand on the Vanderbilt, Park Shore and Naples beaches for an estimated cost of approximately $17,500,000. This would continue the overall six year design life and renourish the beach hot spots to an extent to achieve a true six year life. This design will utilize renourishment gaps in the beach where no renourishment is needed to achieve a six year design life. It also does not address renourishment at Clam Pass Beach Park or Barefoot Beach. Additionally, it does not remove the groins at Park Shore or the address the need for a jetty Spur south of Doctors Pass. The gaps in renourishment will be in Vanderbilt Beach between R22+300 to R25+500; in Park Shore from R47+500 to R50 and on Naples Beach from R64+500 to R68+200 and R72+600 to R79. 3. Although the design and permitting will be for a six year project,the project will continue to be scope managed at contract award if available funding is not sufficient to execute this project. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-5 New Bowies 2 of 4 Savings on the project cost could be expected if this project is combined with similar projects from the Captiva Erosion Control District and/or the City of Longboat Key to share mobilization costs and take advantage of economies of scale. The economies of scale are significant as well as early bidding before contractors have committed their production capacity to other projects. It is anticipated that the construction cost for this project will be between$15,000,000 and $17,500,000 with mobilization and economy of scale savings. The Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)through the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has directed that a Biological Opinion(BO) for Piping Plovers will be required before any federal permit will be issued. This will prohibit renourishment taking place sooner than 9/15/13. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection(FDEP)permit will be issued in time sufficient to support this schedule. Renourishment is planned to occur on the shoulders of turtle nesting season. Renourishment is planned to begin on 9/15/13 instead of 11/1/13 and ending on 6/1/14 instead of 5/1/14. Although the Conservancy does not support renourishment during turtle nesting season, it also will not object to this renourishment schedule. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this project will be from Tourist Development Tax Category A funding within TDC Beach Renourishment Fund 195. Recent developments have impacted on Beach Renourishment funding. FEMA has de-obligated $11,200,000 from previous disaster payments deposited into Fund (195). There also exists some level of overlapping beach renourishment cost share payments previously made by FDEP to Collier County that will be reconciled once the FEMA de-obligation matter has been resolved. The existing set aside for FDEP is $4,900,000. The FEMA action decreased the potential overlap allowing the FDEP reserve to be reduced to $2,000,000. Accordingly, within existing Fund (195) reserves $11,200,000 for FEMA and $2,000,000 for FDEP will be set aside. The Board's 11-1-05 Category"A"Funding Policy mandates annual reserve funding of$2,000,000 for major beach renourishment and$500,000 for catastrophic event recovery. Prior to the FEMA de- obligation the reserve accumulations in FY 14 would have been$16,000,000 for Beach Renourishment and$6,000,000 for catastrophic events recovery. Because of the dynamic impact of the FEMA de- obligation we have prepared the attached analysis worksheet to facilitate discussion and understanding of the fiscal considerations A further consideration is that TDC Category "A" funding is allocated to both TDC Beach Renourishment Fund (195) and TDC Beach Park Facilities Fund (183). Other related funding may be available from the following sources: • FDEP Cost Share could be approximately$5,000,000 with decision timing of 1/1/13. • Restore Act funding could be as high as$5,000,000. • Potential FEMA funding from TS Fay;TS Debbie and potentially TS Isaac. • Reversal or negotiated settlement of the de-obligated$11,200,000. • Project savings from shared mobilization and economies of scale. CAC September 13,2012 VIII-5 New Busines 3 of 4 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to this action. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: To be reviewed by the County Attorney's Office. RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve the six year design and permitting plan. PREPARED BY: J. Gary McAlpin,P.E.,Coastal Zone Management,Natural Resources Department CAC September 13,2012 VIII-5 New Busines 4 of 4 TDC Beach Renourishment Capital Fund(195) Pro-forma analysis Assumes set aside of de-obligated FEMA funds,a , $2M FDEP reimbursement set aside,the addition of � 11$2M la$650,000 truck haul renourishment in FY 13 and a ( Eenourishment fundiacp__f$15.6.000100.__J 9/12/2012 TDC Beach Renourish 195 Capital FY 2013 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 •rojec Line No. Description Budget Pro Forma Pro Forma Pro Forma 1 tk,-72,2 '' S ,, « ,,,.w , xi „,3 a -ei I , ,^i , T-'.2 70004 Doctor's Pass Dredging 800,000 3 80098 Collier Beach Design&Construction 490,000 490,000 15,000,000 4 =MI:° Marco Renourish Design 100,000 100,000 5 MEIN=Beach Tilling 15,000 15,000 40,000 40,000 080203 Laser Grade Marco 35,000 35,000 11111111111 35,000 7 80210 Wggins Pass Charnel 1,700,000 1,700,000 MILIMMEIN MI Beach Renourehment 3,000,000 3,000,000 - 111.01Mr=111112 North Truck Haul Renourishrrent - 650,000 - - 10 90020 TDC Beach Project Adnn-FEMA Recovery 111111. 100000 -- 11 MIMI Biological Monitoring - - - 125,000 ®• •.- Vegetation Repars-Exotic Removal 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 ®90080 Clam Pass Ebb Tide Study ----IIMM 450,000 14 MM.Naples Pier Maintenance 80,000 80,000 82,400 IIIIIIM=IIM Wggins Pass Dredging-Design/Engineering - - - 50,000 1111EIMMINIIIII Beach Cleaning-Naples 76,900 76,900 79,200 81,600 MEM 90533 Beach Cleaning-County/Marco 109,600 109,600 112,900 116,300 MAE 90538 City/County Monitoring 200,000 200,000 206,000 MIIIIIIMEIEra 19 Sub Total P•'ects 5,881,500 8,631500 15,595,500 2,070,000 20 Reserves for Contiru enc 695,800 - - - 21 Ca.-Reserve forCatastro•he 5,500,000 - - 500,000 22 Cap-Reserve for Pier 79,000 - - - 23 IVEIMIRMITIMA rrTMrIIIIIIIII 14,000,000 - 1,234,900 24 . : k•-. 225,800 - - - 25 Reserve-FDEP Refundin• 4,900,000 2,000,000 - - 26 Reserve-FEMA De-obli.ation - 11,200,000 - - 27 Sub Total Reeerves 99195 25,400,600 13,200,000 - 1,734,900 28 T- t.001 B:- Tu I.M• • . IIIIIIIII 160,000 160,000 163200 166,500 29 Trans to 184 Interest Redirection 150,000 150,000 150,000 25,000 30 Trans to 185 Pro'ect Mana•errent&Admin 647,100 647,100 647,100 647,100 31 Trans to 710 Grant Related 32 rans Tax Coll Revenue Cdlection Ex•ense 120,200 124,700 124,700 124,700 33 Sub Total Transfers 1,077,300 1,081,800 1,085,000 963,300 34 Fund Total-Ex.-nditures 32,359,400 20,913 300 16,680;500 4,768200 35 36 ,k dw 0 a'+ ,,.: .M tiit s Ec, a4,,;+, W ".i?i :-w, 37 TDC Revenue(2/3 Cate•o A 4,809,000 4,988,300 4,988,300 4,988,300 38 Reimbursements General 39 FEMA Reimburse for MI Renourishnent 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - 1 Restore Act Funds - - TBD - 41 FDEP Cost Share - - 42 Interest 150,000 150,000 150,000 25,000 43 Ca Forward 26,698,300 26,877,600 11,804,700 5,600 44 5%Rev.Reserve (297,900 297,900) (256,900 250,700 45 Fund Total-Revenues 32,359,400 32,718,000 18,686,100 4,768;200 46 47 Fund Balance/Carry Forward - 11,804,700... 5,800 H:\Budget Files FY 13\Budget Book\TDC\Fund 195\Fund 195 August 2012 Projections(edfinn v1) 1 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-5 New Business 1 of 5 Collier County Beach Volumes 2006 Today's Volume Proposed Design for Reach Constructed Under 2006 Project* Template 6-Year Project 8-Year Project 10-Year Project Vanderbilt 138,105 119,288 59,724 74,076 80,983 Park Shore 140,869 129,444 118,246 135,925 153,604 Naples 358,892 266,370 241,151 278,809 345,510 Sub-Total 637,867 515,102 419,121 488,810 5802098 Barefoot Beach - - - - 100,000 Clam Pass Park - - - - 22,360 Total 637,867 515,102 419,121 488,810 702,458 Notes: 1.)Volumes based upon August 2012 survey 2.)Volumes are based upon October 2013 construction 3.)Volume does not include Pelican Bay I CAC September 13,2012 VIII-5 New Business 2 of 5 Schedule of Bid Items Quantity 2006 Template 6-year Design with 10-year Design Volume TS Debby Impacts with TS Debby Additional Features Bid Item Unit Impacts Construct Beach Fill Hydraulically Mobilization/Demobilization L.S. 1 1 1 1 Beach Fill Vanderbilt BeachSR22.5-R31) C.Y. 119,288 59,724 80,983 Pelican Bay Beach(R31-R37) C.Y. 0 0 0 North Park Shore Beach(R43.5-R48) C.Y. 41,235 58,540 63,783 Park Shore Beach(R48-R54.5) C.Y. 88,209 59,706 89,821 Naples Beach(R58A-R79) C.Y. 266,370 241,151 345,510 Barefoot Beach C.Y. 0 0 0 100,000 Clam Pass Park C.Y. 0 0 0 30,000 Truck Haul(25,000 tons) C.Y. 0 0 0 17,870 Beach Fill Subtotal 515,102 419,121 580,097 _ 147,870 Environmental Monitoring Set Buoys for Pipeline Corridor L.S. 3 3 3 2 Turbidity Monitoring L.S. I 1 1 1 Offshore Sea Turtle Monitoring(Hopper D redge only) Mobilization/Demobilization of Turtle Trawler L.S. 1 1 1 1 Relocation Trawling Day 71 58 80 18 Endangered Species Observer Day 71 58 80 18 Payment and Performance Bond - L.S. 0.67% 0.67% 0.67% 0.67% - Note: I.)Volumes based upon August 2012 Survey 2.)Truck haul volume can be deducted from Naples Beach and Park Shore bid quantities I CAC September 13,2012 VIII-5 New Business 3 of 5 Collier County Beach Renourishment Preliminary Cost Estimate Cost Yr Construction Yr Prices from 2006 Project 2005 2013.5 0.1615 Schedule of Cost Escalation Factor 1.1625 Item Units Unit Price Price Increase Construct Beach Fill Hydraulically 1.Mobilization/Demobilization L.S. $3,700,000.00 $3,700,000.00 Beach Fill 2.Vanderbilt Beach(R22.5-R31) C.Y. $24.09 $28.00 3.Pelican Bay Beach(R31-R37) C.Y. $27.14 $31.55 4.North Park Shore Beach(R43.5-R48) C.Y. $27.42 $31.88 5.Park Shore Beach(R48-R54.5) C.Y. $22.56 $26.23 6.Naples Beach(R58A-R79) C.Y. $26.06 $30.29 7.Beach Tilling L.F. $0.72 $0.84 Environmental Monitoring 8.Set Buoys for Pipeline Corridor G.S. $8,243.00 $9,582.49 9.Turbidity Monitoring L.S. $170,058.00 $197,692.43 pro-rate Offshore Sea Turtle Monitoring(Hopper Dredge only) 10.Mobilization/Demobilization of Turtle Trawler Event $3,642.00 $4,233.83 11.Relocation Trawling Day $3,500.00 $4,068.75 12.Endangered Species Observer Day $579.08 $673.18 13.Payment and Performance Bond (0.67%) L.S. 0.67% 0.67% $29.10 2006 project duration 92 days 2006 project asbuilt volume 667,562 cy production rate 7,256 cy/day CAC September 13,2012 VIII-5 New Business 4 of 5 Collier County Beach Renourishment Preliminary Cost Estimate Schedule of Costs 6-year Design 10-year Design 2006 Template Additional with TS Debby with TS Debby • Volume Features Item Unit Emit Cost Impacts Impacts Couatract Beach Fill Hydraulically Fill Volume C.Y. 515,102 419,121 580,097 147,870 1.Mobilization/Demobilization _ L.S. _ $3,700,000 $3,700,000 $3,700,000 $0 Beach Fill .Vanderbilt Beach(R22.5-R31) C.Y. $28.00 $3,340,616 $1,672,548 $2,267,899 SO '3.Pelican Bay Beach(R31-R37) C.Y. $31.55 $0 SO $0 $0 A.North Park Shore Beach(R43.5-R48) C.Y. $31.88 $1,314,397 $1,866,006 $2,033,131 SO Park Shore Beach(R48-R54.5) C.Y. $26.23 $2,313,369 $1,565,850 $2,355,646 $0 .Naples Beach(R58A-R79) C.Y. _ $30.29 $8,069,613_ $7,305,609 $10,467,139 $0 Environmental Monitoring 7.Set Buoys for Pipeline Corridor L.S. $9,582 $86,242 $86,242 1 $86,242 $19,165 i8.Turbidity Monitoring ' L.S. $197,692 $152,671 $124,223 $171,935 $43,827 Offshore Sea Turtle Monitoring(Hopper Dredge only) 9.Mobilization/Demob.of Turtle Trawler Event $4,233.83 $4,234 $4,234 $4,234 $200,000 10.Relocation Trawling Day $4,068.75 $288,835 $235,016 $325,280 $72,895 11.Endangered Species Observer Day $673.18 $47,788 $38,884 $53,818 $12,061 12.Payment and Performance Bond L.S. 0.67% $129,429 $111,211 $143,818 $2,331 SUB-TOTAL $19,447,194 $16,709,823 $21,609,142 5350,2801 Professional Services 13.Final Design and Permitting&Bidding Period $644,600 $644,600 $644,6001 $166,511 14.During&Post Eng.&Bio.Construction Services $420,400 $420,400 $420,400 $42,442 Additoaai Features 15. Barefoot Beach C.Y. $28.00 SO $0 $0 $2,800,463 16.Clam Pass Park C.Y. $31.71 $0 SO SO $951,390 •1 7.Phase I Removal of Groins L.S. S0 $0 SO $700,000 18.Jetty Spur L.S. $0 SO $0 $900,000 19.Truck Haul Project 25,000 tons $0 SO $0 $637,150 5%Contingency $972,360 $835,491 $1,080,457 $285,107 TOTAL $20,419,554 $17,545,314 $22,689,599 $5,987,239 Special Ajustment 29.10 52,247,539 S2,129,043 TS Debby 29.10 SO SO $15,297,776 $20,560,555 CAC September 13,2012 VIII-5 New Business 5 of 5 McAlpinGary From: Sharp, Nicole[Nicole.Sharp©shawgrp.com] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 11:17 AM To: McAlpinGary Cc: Keehn, Stephen Subject: RE: Project Limits and Gaps Note the correction at Vanderbilt beach. I omitted a zero in my first email. Vanderbilt Beach: Project limits=R-22+300 to R-30+500 Gaps= R-22+300 to R25+509 Nicole S. Sharp, P.E. From: Sharp, Nicole Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 11:03 AM To: 'GaryMcAlpin @colliergov.net Cc: Keehn, Stephen Subject: Project Limits and Gaps Gary: Below is a breakdown of permit limits and the gaps within those limits. Vanderbilt Beach: Project limits= R-22+300 to R-30+500 Gaps= R-22+300 to R25+500 Park Shore: Project Limits=R-43+500 to R-54+400 Gaps= R-47+500 to R-50, Naples Beach: Project Limits= R-58A-480 to R-79 Gaps= R-64+500 to R-68+200, R-72+600 to R-79 Please let me know if you need anything else. Nicole S.Sharp, P.E. Coastal Engineer Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. A Shaw Group Company 2481 N.W. Boca Raton Blvd Boca Raton FL 33431 561-361-3171(direct) 561-391-8102 (office) 561-391-9116(fax) nicole.sharo shawgrq.com www.coastalplanning.net 1