Loading...
CAC Agenda 09/13/2012 w/TDC Meeting Agenda and Notice COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE &TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL JOINT WORKSHOP(CAC) THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 - 6:00 P.M. TO 7:00 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS THIRD FLOOR, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES *Sunshine Law on Agenda Questions .2012 CAC MEETING DATES I. Call to Order II. Pledge of Allegiance III. Roll Call IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda VIII. New Business 1. Presentation and Discussion on Engineering and Design Considerations/Parameters Necessary to Successfully Renourish Collier County Beaches in 2013/2014, 2. Review of Discussion of Quantities required for a 6 year; 8 year and 10 year design. 3. Public Discussion/Comment. X. Announcements XI. Committee Member Discussion XII. Next Meeting Date/Location XIII. Adjournment All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board prior to the meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Gail D. Hambright at (239) 252-2966. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380. Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. Collier County Ordinance No. 99-22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Anthony P. Pires, Jr., Esq., Chairman Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee FROM: Colleen M. Greene, Assistant County Attorne CMG-- DATE: March 18, 2010 RE: Sunshine Law and Agenda question The issue presented is whether the Sunshine Law requires that an agenda be made available prior to board meetings. In summary,the answer is no. The Sunshine Law Manual (2009 Ed. Vol. 31)provides the following: The Attorney General's Office recommends publication of an agenda, if available, in the notice of the meeting; if an agenda is not available, subject matter summations might be used. However, the courts have held that the Sunshine Law does not mandate that an agency provide notice of each item to be discussed via a published agenda. Such a specific requirement has been rejected because it could effectively preclude access to meetings by members of the general public who wish to bring specific issues before a governmental body. See Hough v. Stembridge, 278 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). And see Yarbrough v. Young, 462 So. 2d 515 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (posted agenda unnecessary; public body not required to postpone meeting due to inaccurate press report which was not part of the public body's official notice efforts). Thus, the Sunshine Law has been interpreted to require notice of meetings, not of the individual items which may be considered at that meeting. However, other statutes, codes or ordinances may impose such a requirement and agencies subject to those provisions must follow them. Accordingly, the Sunshine Law does not require boards to consider only those matters on a published agenda. "[W]hether to impose a requirement that restricts every relevant commission or board from considering matters not on an agenda is a policy decision to be made by the legislature." Law and Information Services, Inc. v. City of Riviera Beach, 670 So. 2d 1014, 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). Today's Coastal Advisory Committee Clam Bay Subcommittee was properly noticed in compliance with the Sunshine Law on or about February 1, 2010. Further, the agenda for today's meeting was also publically noticed on the County's website on Monday, March 15, 2010. The related back-up materials for the agenda were supplemented and available on the County's website on Wednesday, March 17, 2010. In addition, a number of these materials also appeared on the agenda for the Coastal Advisory Committee meeting on Thursday, March 11, 2010. In my opinion, there is no violation of the Sunshine Law and no legal issue regarding the date the agenda was published. cc: Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management Co te-r County Public Services Division Coastal Zone Management TO: CAC Board Members FROM: Gail Hambright, Accountant DATE: December 1, 2011 SUBJECT: 2012 CAC Scheduled Meetings Please mark your calendar for the following 2011 CAC scheduled meeting dates: January 12,2012 February 9, 2012 March 8,2012 April 12,2012 May 10, 2012 June 14, 2012 July 12, 2012 August 9,2012 September 13,2012 October 11, 2012 November 8, 2012 December 13, 2012 All meetings will be held in the Board of County Commissioner's chambers,third floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, unless otherwise noted. A public notice will be sent out before each meeting. l �Y Cdier County Coastal Zane Management•3299 Tamiami Trail East.Suite 103•Naples,Florida 34112.5746.239.252.2966•FAX 239-252-2950 www coiliergov.neticoastalzonemanagernent September 13,2012 CAGTDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 1 of 39 Collier County: Beach Design wa x Sn P.E. Nicole tephen SharpKeeh, P.E. , COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. CPE' Gary McAlpin Collier County Coastal Zone Management September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 2 of 39 Objectives • Demonstrate beach design process for a 2006 size project for Collier County • Review volumes and cost of design alternatives — Based on Aug 2006 Survey Data — Volumes and Project Limits Modified. CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 3of39 2013 Project Goals • Respond quickly to address impacts from Tropical Storm Debby • Comprehensive project to address hot spots and extend project life — Recognize that a compromise is required to construct under tight time and budget constraints 1 CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 4 of 39 2006 Project Performance • Performance has been good, but hot spots govern Collier County Project Performance 57 APr-OS 900.000 TS Fay TS Debby 46- 750,000 ... 5 Jun-071 ..-- O _ , -800,000 e t 34-, Jun-0f O • t C -450,000 Q a 0 23. Jl•0l 0ct-9 a Au p-+2 a Jul-tt ►e . 300,000 11 , - 150.000 Nov-06 0 -0 2005 2008 2007 • 2008 I 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ` Survey Date 1 Muter*m November 2006 survey No 2 Volumes measured to-11 3'NAVD —e—Beech WSdtll 3 Beech oncth measured at MINI(.03'NAVD) —se—Volume i CPE As of 2012, 77% of Volume and 49% of Shoreline Remain September 13.2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 5 of 39 3 BAREFOOT BEACH t -4 WIGCANS PASS N TALLAHASSEE JACKSONVILLE OELNOR Y IGGI- •, _ STATE DARN .� n T$ LOGATpN�',TAMPA O ATLANTIC I \ OCEAN ■ r HENDRY CO. N 0 BOLA 1 ice' LE _ RATON Vanderbt�, i%I E T c4 f. " N TM16W A DER9l'j,. t / " CM <1, =oucP 'Or' \- MEXICO �' F MONROE CA.. OF f /. ,�1 MEXICO y PERMITTED Yl PIPELINE CORRIDOR RO CLAM PASS SR BBB 1111 / N WOOD /+/ PARK SHORE • % L) Shore R - i OOCT`.•S PASS.115 I SR an Mill— *III�` NAP SP 868 _ R NAPLES fss� % % ples 2. M M OCCO LEGEND: / !,.1 ---.\-\\,) PERMITTED PIPELINE CORRIDOR ® 2608 PERMITTED TEMPLATE 1 0\ NEW SEGMENTS GULF 1' PROPOSED NEMSHORE OF { \l — -- OPERATgNAL AREAS 15�1 3 r . ® PERABTTEO OAPSHORE ` MEX/CO (T I � rROrAL \. OPERATIONAL AREAS i` G RH MEP MONUMENTS NOTES: GORDON PASS I COORDINATES ARE CPE BASED ON FLOROA STATE • PLANE NE.COORDINATE SYSTEM \ R PLAN COORDIATE STS IEM `` S¢ \ DATVM OF H16300404 2 FILL wIOTHS ME NOT TO SCALE. • t GRAPHIC SCALE IN FT �� . C September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 6of39 Topics • Design Parameters • • Coastal Engineering Conventions • Restrictions • Calculations • Special Adjustments CPE • September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 7of39 Design Parameters • Volume Change • MHW Shoreline Change • Performance to Design Standard • Mean Grain Size CPE lH it September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 8 of 39 Volume Change Collier County Average Erosion Rates from 1996-2010 1996 2004 2006 2010 •Composite(1996 to 2010) ---2003-2000 -18.00 Barefoot Beach Naples Park Vanderbilt Hot Spot Shore -16.00 --14.00 Doctors Pass Hot Spot \\,1 -12.00 Cj --10.00 $i a R27 -8.00 Park Shore Hot Spot >° -00 J r y _2.00 A. .' /_ Ai �..` � 0.00 r'A7oxw F707470xxx FF70FAzwxxmmxxxxxxv-+F,:FAFA-ixxxxxxmxnAAAAAAAxmxwmA%FT77 mxim xmxx ExmmxwT ,£apgf r- NW00�OOO OCJJJJJVVJJV T�� � �t�•T� �j to ayJ.S43a L W W t.�Wtw'wtJNIJNIJIJNfJNIJ-- —O LOOJO.�nP wN—O COOtiO• Y �SOWOUO._�P�Wi.MWN�SLOO .'`N �000ip iiWN—O LOONTnP wN—O LOOan 6wN� .. .j•a Note � I•measurements eeh mailable from June 2001)to%1ay 20174 foe to 2044 time period FDEP R-Monument d 2.)Accretions!1"aloes art not thou Represented In iero on the plot CPE E September 13.2012 •y CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 9 of 39 MHW Shoreline Change Vanderbilt Beach SHORELINE CHANGES — NOV.2005 to JUNE 2006 •NOV.2005 to JULY 2011 NOV.2005 to AUG.2012 80 R27 A R26 800 1 .I Ilk r V 20 • / • PROJECT AREA ► `� V 4-PELICAN BAY .--VANDERBILT BEACH -20 A T A A A A xl A 31 A A A A A A A A A A A c m m -i nourn4--R-MONUMENT LOCATION--*NORTH i ' CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TOC Jant Workshop VIII-1 New Business 10 of 39 Performance to Design Standard 2012 TOTAL BEACH WIDTH REMAINING ■••■•DESIGN STANDARD --NOV.05 ——JUNE 2008 —JULY 2011 ammo AUG 2012 200 I\ I 4—Park Shore—► Vanderbi jit I 175 1 i I I � 1 t i I R'6 & R2 ' 150 '1 ki. gilt, � I' ,25 INT, 0 t,, �i too - t')" .1k ''' 1 *-,..,z -.-4" 7s ' t r/ Naples Beach ' ` ` 0 4.7 E T 1111111111W; ,. -25 A'O;a .LZJD.'0;;��1.�;'O.V'e 2J.�71D71Sii'D 'HA DSO D.U-73mximmmmmommmmmmmmmmmmzIm Dx S4,A�pmmpF Z Hot Spots in 2012 ro co ' ex Clam Pass Park and Pelican , R-MONUMENT LOCATION _� {CPE Bay not in project limits s°" 4— NORTH September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 11 of 39 Mean Grain Size Same Width Different Volume Coarse, Similar, and Finer Sand Size ivFr�'1't � ,A ' ., NOVD F „,1Trek.4'71,,,,,' ''':'''''''''''' » z y -:',":',7.k`` .L 8 psi a f 3 t a. ,+, g..r r s ,K a try ., r`$ fFp o- a,'rw erg �7 ��k*ffis�,�'�"� `..`,"��'��»�z», 'a«dt�rK.�s�; �«�d�"ti`j.�wea%i`�',€�iw�?:..3�st'�. ;4.' � :�<`�^�..�5`rs,-3s;� CPE Vandebilt 1995 —Cape Romano(.18 mm) —Naples Offhsore(24 mm) •--Toms Hill-Truck Haul(.35-.42 mm) September 13.2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 12 of 39 Coastal Design Conventions • Plan View — Looking down on project • Profile View - Cross-section of project at a specific point — Profile Translation CPE ti 11 i September 13.2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 13 of 39 Plan View • R26 and R27 at Vanderbilt Beach • Baseline, Beach Width MH , W Line and Profile Vii' ,, n= ` sx° i� .r a fit: �YiF" �t Y; NW \ . , 2012 MHW Line 100' Design Standard a �1 t CPE " Hardbottorr� . September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 14 of 39 Profile View • Elevation vs Distance from R-monument 0rMr!LE i:NE. 0-76 r PfiOEIi[LIME:0-27 LOCATION.COW 06un17 x Meer Nigh WNW UM } c ` Mean MO WNW Lion 1 1 1 - i............. August 2012 Profile I 1 August 2012 Profile ---^ 100 ft.Design Cross 100 Et.01.100 Cross fec000 fe<000 100 0 X00 700 300 .00 :90 600 i00 000 -100 0 '.00 200 700 70 200 600 700 000 Olstua from Mon.emmt r-16 Distance from Westmont 0-27 ;5r R-26 R-27 (above design standard) (requires fill) CPE - We; f11..!ll >t ;afi(iC nubby. ;1h 1(;1l .;dti':,f;i:1 Il);(C'.E"I Of September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 15 of 39 Profile Equilibration vs Profile Translation Relates Volumes to Shoreline Change Vanderbilt Profile R-27 Translated 32ft 8 —Aug.2012 6 - —Translated 2012 4 Vol = w x(B + h*) xEf fective Distance 2 - w B MHW=0.33 ft 0 o A -2 . d c 2 -4 - I h* -8 . -10 . D0c.71.3 tt V -12 -14 - . -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 CPE Distance(1t) • September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Bustneu 16of39 Environmental Restrictions • Hardbottom • Sea Turtle Nesting Season • Shorebirds • Turbidity • Screening Rocks and Shells CPE September 13.2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workalwp VIII-1 New Business 17 of 39 Hard bottom • Factor that directly impacts �� � Collier County's beach ' ` design ,. .A_ , n • Avoiding hardbottom . d, r�. impacts is a MUST! p Mfr G im « • x 5 , 9 ,Y r^. wj�* �'v5l ^'�iAli/ ..�> *�, a roE OF Fug +? x �Y �� �� Dean'sEPM r 9� ` kt Method +•..-4 FDEP : 1 �.� Method rasa Z '7- 1 <R;t w ,yy 4 '*` u''.t. ' '7.‘."'41.'''''I% # CPE � .It fii�' :`3 .x , r 5. r; September 13.2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 18 of 39 Sea Turtle Nesting Season, Shorebirds, and Turbidity • Indirect issues affecting design • Construction in sea turtle nesting and shorebird seasons can involve special permit conditions v • CPE I September 13,2012 CAC/MC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 19 of 39 Screening Shell and Rocks • Allows sand to be pumped ashore while coarse material is removed • Allows for manageable shell content _� ' ' 1' " iTf' k N A i:�r ► � t� '7°,1� ..T: 7 .'tk � i ,.� 4* r fy}s , �,ORM e..,�+ 7 ' : 7 � a �F1 :4 ` i' � •4",.‘c.".'...).. � p r � X a' ( :,, 0 ' - , ... "'k`"P'' T., II'. ,i ,4,-, ...1 •,. .,!'. fib — ,' A It 4 CPE It September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 20 of 39 Design Calculation • Average Annual Erosion Rate • Design Fill • Reserve Advanced Nourishment • Advanced Nourishment • Future Erosion 10 • A S.. WID HD--ION LT= EXAMPLE DESIGN TEMPLATE bl PRE-CONSTRUCTION -_4 PROFILE F _-__ ,% MHW kZiG ` EXISTING PROFILE WIDTH REMAINI 0 5 TOTAL BEACH Reserve Volume,Advanced WIDTH REMAINING Nourishment Design Fill CPE -too 50 100 150. 200 250 309 NOTES: - DISTANCE(FEET) 1.SASELINE SET AT SEAWALL,EDGE OF VEGETATION,OR EQUIVALENT September 13,2012 CACITDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 21 of 39 Average Annual Erosion Rate • Determined by historic erosion trends R-26 R-27 1996 to 2004 Volumetric Change - -12,652 c.y. -19,714 c.y. 1996 to 2004 Fill Placed 3,406 c.y. 3,406 c.y. 2006 to 2012 Volumetric Change -4,369 c.y. -4,095 c.y. 2006 to 2012 Fill Placed 0 c.y. 0 c.y. Gross Annual Erosion Rate -1,442 cy/yr -1,921 cy/yr • Fill placed is discounted from the erosion rate t . CPE it September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 22 of 39 Design Fill • Brings the shoreline to established design standards - 100 feet for Vanderbilt Beach and Naples Beach — 85 feet for Park Shore — Calculate volume using profile translation 2012 TOTAL BEACH WIOTH RENAMING 1 —DESIGN STANDARD ---NOV 2C06 ——JUNE 2000 ---JULY 2011 —AUG 2012 150 l , \ 1\ , .-- 140 / \ ,s \ / /. \ i \ , \ I ...., , 1 ti,,is.,/ •N S2 \ \ ! i \ 120 i \ ; 1/ ^— \/ ALli ii\ i iii, 110 , - , \ 1, 1 iti „,,, tr v --,... 1 \ . ‘ ,,..-Nr. ", , 9. :, ,,,, 1 / ,y .;, -: \ Bo ... NOM DIS DOOM Mt MGM=FROSI WU IMILIOR NT AT MCK 01 Mal ,; i,..J4 70 i ; ; ; -J ; ; 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1' 4 4 f CPE I ri Not Spots H 2012 i 0„ft..Bpy per pi pr r ippirp scum 4—R.MONULIENT LOCATION--b. September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 23 of 39 Design Beach Width • Design for Recreation • Absorbs Storm Impacts - 10-20 year storm for Collier County N - w e. .,,ate°'" ., i CPE September 13,2012 CAGTDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 24 of 39 Design Fill • Example calculation at R-26 and R-27: R-26 R-27 Effective Distance 986 ft 1095 ft Berm Heigh 4ft 4ft Design Width (measured from baseline) 100 ft 100 ft 2012 MHW Location to Design Standard 23.7 ft in front 9.6 ft behind Volume Needed to Bring Profile to Design Standard 0 c.y. 5,924 c.y. • Design standard is 100' seaward of established baseline Volume needed to bring profile back to design is: — Volume = Width * (Berm + DOC) * Effective Distance • Where width is the deficit to design standard i CPE Note: All profiles in project area assume depth of closure of -11 .3 ft-NAVD September 13,2012 CAC/TOC Joint Workshop VIII.1 New Business 25 of 39 Reserve Advanced Nourishment • Actual beach greater than design standard R-26 R-27 Location Compared to Design Standard in front behind Reserve Volume 13,265 c.y. 0 c.y. • Volume located within the reserve is calculated as follows: — Volume = Width * (Berm + DOC) * Effective Distance • Where width is the amount of shoreline in front of the design standard • CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 26 0(39 Profile Equilibration & Advanced Nourishment . h%,w . T Post-Construction fir ' Adjustment Re-Nourishment Advance Fill A ik 11 0 k O f � > Loss of Advance Fill A � -1 0 � � r a" '�`4 x oy::� 3, me lrx� ti c � is �', . {fit `i g# @ kr:: 8 o* -20 x . � d''4 ��N<,, T��f�3 � k 'fib � ��. �'� k�,t�F� ��,�h� j�,��� ,y, �{�,� �� �C 3 ".k a EE -30 .w >.s ,Y�.a.'.�. dsa.,;,;. z,ari. ,.:,.>.w,. ...s:mss .wxa; ,�N....,.«. ,...v.w�. ,._,.,_,._..<... —200 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 s CPE DISTANCE 1 September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 27 of 39 Advanced Nourishment R-26 R-27 Erosion Rate -1,442 cy/yr -1,921 cy/yr Project Design Life 6 years 6 years Amount of Fill Needed to Maintain Design Standard 8,652 c.y. 11,526 c.y. Amount of Reserve Volume 13,265 c.y. 0 c.y. ►t-���« !'_� ►���t��•�'t.�ti�ir�!.���ta�►� 0 c.y. 11,526 c.y. • Helps maintain intended project design for duration of the project • Adv. Nourishment = Erosion Rate x Project Life CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 28 of 39 Future Erosion • Accounts for erosion based upon historic trends projected until the time of construction R-26 R-27 Erosion Rate -1,442 cy/yr -1,921 cy/yr Time until Construction 1.25 years 1.25 years Future Erosion 1,803 c.y. 2,401 c.y. Fill Needed to Maintain Design Standard + Future Erosion 10,455 c.y. 13,927 c.y. Amount of Reserve Volume 13,265 c.y. 0 c.y. Future Erosion Accounted for in Construction Volume 0 c.y. 2,401 c.y. • Future Erosion: — Erosion rate * time until construction For current design, 1.25 years of future erosion were accounted for Fall 2013 construction CPE September 13.2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 29 of 39 Total Design • Accounts for all elements in the design process - Vol = Design Fill + Advanced Nourishment + Future Erosion R-26 R-27 Design Fill 0 c.y. 5,924 c.y. Advanced Nourishment 0 c.y. 11,526 c.y. Future Erosion 0 c.y. 2,401 c.y. Special Adjustmen Total Volume 0 c.y. 19,851 c.y. — Must account for Special Adjustments in order to address constructability and stability of sand by the use of transitions and tapers CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 30 of 39 Constructability • Minimum Fill Density • Tolerance • Accuracy CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII.1 New Business 31 of 39 Transitions/Tapers • Help stabilize fill within the project areas • Neutralizes spreading proportional to size • Vanderbilt Beach - R-26, R-30 • Park Shore - R-44, R-47, R-50, R-54 • Naples Beach - R-58A, R-64, R-69, R-72 CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 32 of 39 Gaps • Eliminates the sand everywhere standard often used in public projects • Vanderbilt Beach omm �' • 1 ......_ ° .off. V ee� .... _. w,w — R-22+300 to R-25+500 VIACERit • Park Shore 'i,i) !' 1 I • — R-47+500 to R-50 I ) v...i t�...._T • Naples Beach �: ?,� , � — R-64+500 to R-68+200 1 1 iii.: 1 F MN tn.aY;. — R-72+600 to R-79 g , M •■ 1 Ir,•' A/6Y/CO yy4, A< CPEK...•., 1 September 13,2012 CAC/TOC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 33of39 Design Alternatives • 2006 Template • 2006 Design — 6-yr Design life and hotspots — 10-yr Design life and hotspots • 10 Year Comprehensive Design — Barefoot Beach — Clam Pass Park — Removal of groins — Jetty Spur i CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 34 of 39 R-26 and R-27 Design Summary R-26 R-27 Design Fill 0 c.y. 5,924 c.y. Advanced Nourishment 0 c.y. 11,526 c.y. Future Erosion 0 c.y. 2,401 c.y. Special Adjustmen 9,864 c.y. 0 c.y. Total Volume 9,864 c.y. 19,851 c.y. CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 35 of 39 Project Area Design Summary 6Year 10 Year Design Fill 119,303 c.y. 119,303 c.y. Advanced Nourishment 206,456 c.y. 363,333 c.y. Future Erosion 47,186 c.y. 52,233 c.y. Special Adjustmen 46,176 c.y. 45,229 c.y. Total Volume 419,121 c.y. 580,098 c.y. CPE September 13,2012 CACRDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 36 of 39 6-Year Design by Profile Spreadsheet t.. _ la = .: m ,o 11 _ 1" .. pq :ff] .o to ° .. ae__ ( - __.. R 1 as _13 .0+ 11 3 :. .. ° _ i(f 'Y" ff�1 is 10 RH R37"- f.-.. 3... ...i( Ib... .Il 41 3 .11 • ..... a .-..... N..:.'02 1025 . ., _.o._.._. – --. –e e mu)a u 15 M'art % 1a a ° Ri x _...32 AllEE .666 • et .0__ 11 j 43x — __ - f.� 4. a E .__ 3 m ai. 773–",.. ----y _ssa1,722 4 itC).• t] 0 Im 16 557 _,dD__ im -�� 01 :° . 11) ----.- - AV_ _o e 11511 _ ' I AO---411) "°;'°".." 1 1 ° - 1401 1, 14 Ra 21 13 .mt m , -21 0 113' RA •■ 011 40 113 N a) .0 13 21751 . p __.. c ' _—a�✓)P!! ° •Ha r 1 RT) .• II 40 to s i5i _ -_�ri J 1 Rte 0 — 1112 ] •- a .o •t n t RRditARw E:11111111111= ©= 11.1®111:11=11:111:® LMVRlt..c 02.4.7111 ARE AVPNOR3Y'EiEML*CJ,uli,3REACCOUNT FOR 214.44/612 DEW.Of 10C111f 44200•3.*VOLUME I MEDIC EA(®W031100ELi.3 Alp VIPER aECTme CPE • September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 37 of 39 Schedule of Bid Menu Quantity 2006 Template 6-year Design 10-year Design Volume with TS Debby with TS Debby Additional Features Bid Mem Unit Impacts Impacts Construct Beach Fill draulicall ---- Mobilization/Demobilization L.S. 1 1 1 1 Beach Fill Vanderbilt Beach R22.5-R31 C.Y. 119,288 59,724 80,983 METVEMran C.Y. 0 0 0 North Park Shore Beach •43.5-R48 C.Y. 41,235 58,540 63,783 Park Shore Beach '48-R54.5 C.Y. 88,209 59,706 89,821 Naples Beach R58A-R79 C.Y. 266,370 241,151 345,510 Barefoot Beach C.Y. 0 0 0 100,000 Clam Pass Park C.Y. o 0 0 _ 30,000 Truck Haul 25,000 tons C.Y. milli 0 0 immum___�n Beach Fill Subtotal 111.111.1111 515,102 419,121 580,097 ,' . Environmenta ••. . �'— Set Buo s for Pi.eline Corridor LS. 3 3 3 2 Turbid it Monitorin: L.S. 1 I 1 1 Offshore Sea Turtle Monitorin:(Ho..er Dred_:e onl ) Mobilization/Demobilization of Turtle Trawler L.S. I 1 1 1 r=: Relocation Trawlin: Da 71 58 80 18 Endan•ered S.ecies Observer Da 71 58 80 18 Pa ment and Performance Bond L.S. 0.67% 0.67% 0.67% 0.67% Note: l.)Volumes based upon August 2012 Survey 2.)Truck haul volume can be deducted from Naples Beach and Park Shore bid quantities ‘ i CPE September 13,2012 CAC/TOC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 38 of 39 Collier County Beach Renourishment Preliminary Cost Estimate Schedule of Costs 2006 Template 6-year Design 10 year Design Addtional Volume with TS Debby with TS Debby Item Unit Unit Cost Impacts Impacts Features onstruct Beach Fill Hydraulically ill Volume C.Y. 515,102 419,121 580,097 147,870 1.Mobilization/Demobilization L.S. $3,700,000 $3,700,000 $3,700,000 $0 Beach Fill 2.Vanderbilt Beach(R22.5-R31) C Y. $28.00 $3,340,616 $1,672,548 $2,267,899 SO 3.Pelican Bay Beach(R31-R37) C.Y. $31.55 SO $0 SO $0 •.North Park Shore Beach(R43.5-R48) C.Y. $31.88 $1,314,397 $1,866,006 $2,033,131 SO 5.Park Shore Beach(R48-R54.5) C.Y. $26.23 $2,313,369 $1,565,850 $2,355,646 SO 6.Naples Beach(R58A-R79) C.Y. $30.29 $8,069,613_ $7,305,609_ $10,467,139 SO Environmental Monitoring 7.Set Buoys for Pipeline Corridor L.S. $9,582 $86,242 $86,242 $86,242 $19,165 8.Turbidity Monitoring L.S. $197,692 $152,671 $124,223 $171,935_ $43,827 Offshore Sea Turtle M onitoring(Hopper Dredge only) 9.Mobilization/Demob.of Turtle - - rawler Event $4,233.83 $4,234 $4,234 $4,234 $200,000 10.Relocation Trawling Day $4,068.75 $288,835 $235,016 $325,280 $72,895 11.Endangered Species Observer Day $673.18 $47,788 $38,884 $53,818 $12,061 12.Payment and Performance Bond L.S. 0.67% , SUB-TOTAL $19,447,194 $16,709,823 $21,609,142 $350,280 Professional Services 13.Final Design and Permitting&Bidding Period S644,600 $644,600 S644,600 $166,511 14.During&Post Eng&Bio.Construction Services $420,400 $420,400 $420,400 542,442 Additonal Features 15. Barefoot Beach C.Y $28.00 SO S0) SO $2,800,463 16. Clam Pass Park C.Y. $31.71 SO SO SO $951,390 17.Phase I Removal of Groins L.S. SO SO SO $700,000 18.Jetty Spur L.S. S0 SO $0 $900000 19.Truck Haul Project 25,000 tons SO SO SO $637,150 1, CPE . 5%Contingency $972,360 $835,491 $1,080,457 $285,107 - TOTAL $20,419,554 $17,545,314 $22,689,599 $5,987,239 • September 13,2012 CAC/TDC Joint Workshop VIII-1 New Business 39 0139 Thank You ! cpE CPE