BCC Minutes 02/05/1991 RNaples, Florida, February 5, 199!
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
Appeals and as the governing board(s} of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:'00 A.M. in REaULA~ SESSION in Building
"F, of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
CHAIRMAN:
VICE-CHAIRMAN:
Patricia Anne Goodnight
Michael J. Volpe
Richard S. Shanahan
Max A. Hasse, Jr.
Burr L. Saunders
ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk; John Yonkosk¥, Finance
Director; Annette Guevln and Wanda Arright, Deputy Clerks; Neil
Dotrill, County Manager; Ron McLemore, Assistant County Manager; Ken
Cu¥1er, County Attorney; George Archibald, Transportation Services
Administrator; Frank Brutt, Community Development Administrator;
William Lorenz, Environmental Services Administrator; Jay Reardon,
Emergency Services Administrator; Ken Bagtnski, Planning Services
Manager; Ron NAno and Wayne Arnold, Planners; Sue Ftlson,
Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Gary Young,
Sheriff's Office.
Page
mw~?,:: .. February 5, 1991
-~; · - ,,, . .
c~J~'~i~mJy, tht the agenda be approved with the foll~tng~'~'
mf~j~jJ 1. item S9D1 - Paradise Pointe Sewer Facilities Acceptance -
r? Added. (Requested by Commissioner Shanahah. )
m[~// 2. item ~9H5 - Recommendation to consider adoption of a
~ tlon fixing the time and place for a publtc heartn~
~ raining to the Pine Ridge Industrial Park Area Improvement
Assessment District - Added. (Requested by Staff.)
. >: 4.
?
Item #16C2 - Recommendation that the Board of County
Commissioners approve an amendment to the contract for
Recreational Facilities of America, Inc., a concessionaire at
Tigertail Beach - Continued to 2/12/91. (Requested by
Staff.)
Item #9B1 - Status Report on the consultant selection process
for the Immokalee Airport Improvements, including a recommen-
dation to discontinue negotiations with Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc., for roadway, utility, and DRI services and
to commence negotiations with Delta Associates for the same
services - Withdrawn. (Requested by Staff.)
Item #?B2 - Petition PU-90-23, requesting provisional use "b"
within the RSF-4 zoning district for reverse osmosis water
treatment, storage and pumping plant and associated facili-
ties on Marco Island - Request by Commissioner Shanahah that
this item be heard at 10:15 A.M.
70
Item #16C3 - Recommendation to award Bid #90-1658 for
construction of three (3) Community Centers - Continued to
2/12/91. (Requested by Commissioner Volpe.)
Item #16H2 moved to #9H2 - Recommend that the Board of County
Commissioners approve reimbursable expenses on the
Architectural Agreement for the Courthouse pro~ect.
(Requested by Commissioner Volpe.)
Item #16H7 - Recommendation that the Board of County
Commissioners authorize the Chair to execute an Interlocal
agreement between Collier County and the Board of Supervisors
of the Lely Community Development District - Commissioner
Volpe declared a potential conflict of Interest on this Item
and asked that it be voted on separately from the Consent
Agenda - Removed from Consent Agenda.
CON$,~NT AGENDA - ApPROVED AND/OR ADOPTED
AppROVED
09
The motion for approval Of the Consent Agenda is noted under Item
Page 2
February 5, 1991
The motton~ for approval of the Clerk'e Report are noted in Iteu
~Z~5 OF ~~ ~ SPRCZ~ ~gT/NGS 0F DECKER 11, 1990 -
Commissioner Shanahas novsd, seconded tr~ Co~i88ioner Hasse and
c~rrted unantml¥, that the Ntnutss of the Regular and Spscial
Ne~t~ of D~cemb~r 11, 1990 b~ approved-as presented.
Ztem ~S& -'
s vlca - m sg rgD
Commissioner Shanahan presented service awards to the following
Collier County employees:
Gregory A. Tavernlet, Utilities/Operations - 5 years
Patsy J. Farley, Library/Naples Branch - 10 years
Inocencto G. Flores, Road and Bridge/District I - 10 years
PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 10-16, 1991, AS
VOCATIONAL EDUCATION WEEK - ADOPTED
Upon reading and presenting the proclamation to Jim Rubrick, June
Mitchell, B.J. Jansen and Leonore Ferguson, Commissioner Saunders
moved, xconded b~ Co~issionsr Hases and carried u~antnously, that
Page 3
February 5, 1991
Upon reading and presenting the proclamation to Vtcky Todd and
(~lenna Hahoe, Co~lasloner Hasae moved, seconded by Coaates~oner
Shanahah and carrted unanlnousl¥, that the Month of February, 1991, be
d~et~nated ~ Hospice of Naples, Inc. Month.
Page 4
February 5, 1991
1991, AS AETNA
Upon reading and presenting the proclamation to Randy Gaffnay and
Jim Narttn, Commissioner Volpe moved, seconded by Conniestoner
carried unanimously, that the Week of February 11-18,
1991, be deatgnated as Aetna Challenge Week.
Page 5
a plaque and cash award.
CERTIFICATES OF COMPLETION FOR CERTIFICATE IN SUPERVISORY
Faomu - RES FrrD
Upon request by Susan Wtestng, Human Resources Supervisor,
Commissioner Goodnight presented Certificates of Completion for the
Supervisory Management Program to the following employees:
Steve Camell, Purchasing Director, Administrative Services
David Davenport, Technical Services Coordinator, Community
Development Services
Kathleen McLarty, Senior Secretary, Transportation Services
Jim McMtchael, Public Management Associate from Florida State
University~s FL Center for Public Management, described the scope and
focus of the program and the extent of participation within the State
of:Florida.
Ite~Cl
RESOLUTION 91-134 RE PETITION AV-90-014, ANCHOR ENGINEERING AS AGENT
FOR OWHER AMILCAR, INC., REQUESTING VACATION OF ALL PUBLIC INTEREST IN
A PORTION OF AN EIGHTY FOOT (80~) ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY PLATTED AS
GOODLAND DRIV~ ON THE PLAT OF MARCO BEACH UNIT 15 - ADOPTED AS AMHNDED
AND*WITH CONDITIONS
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on
January 6, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearin~ was opened ~o consider Petition AV-90-014,
flied by Anchor Engineering as agent for owner Amtlcar, Inc.,
requesting vacation of all public interest in a portion of an eighty
foot (80~) road right-of-way on Good/and Drive, Marco Island.
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald reported the sub-
Ject roadway is located on the south side of C.R. 92. He added this
.;~.~:;.-segment of Goodland Drive is approximately one mile to the east of
~?~:: Barfield Drive. He mentioned the current road terminates to the south
:" '~ of C.R. 92 because of a settlement agreement between Deltona and the
Page 6
!~i~,,,..St&te of Florida. He said the petitioner has purchased the property
~,~. at the southeast terminus of the roadway, which is currently zoned PUD
~[[j on the south and includes approximately ten acres of a multi-family
9.. project. He ~nd~cated the applicant has also purchased to the north,
~[[~[': the frontage alon~ the roadway, consls~n~ of portions of Lots 4, 5,
, ~F:~,~ and ~ of the same plat. He advised they are askln~ for vacation of
the portion of the roadway that would be centered through the develop-
ment complex in order to maximize their site for condominium develop-
ment along with site improvements. He reported Staff recommends
approval of this petition with certain conditions. He explained the
first condition is recognizing the responsibility of the developer to
construct a cul-de-sac where the roadway will end. He related the
second concern involves access and the remaining lots that have multi-
family zoning. He expressed Staffis recommendation that a unity of
title continue involving the PUD property and Lots 4, 5, 6 and ? in
order to ensure there is no possibility in the future of right-of-way
being needed for any parcels. He also mentioned a housekeeping Item
within the resolution, stating Marco Beach Unit 13 should correctly
read Unit 1§.
Commissioner Volpe questioned if it is possible to include a
restriction in the public records for subsequent purchasers of the
lots, in terms of unity of ownership7 County Attorney Cuyler replied
that-the public can be put on notice through the record system.
Ms. Sam Hollen (phonetic}, representing Elysee Development
Corporation, agreed to the conditions imposed by Staff and the addi-
tional condition to provide documentation as may be required by Staff
to establish on the record that there wll! not be a breakup of
ownership of Lots 4, 5, 6 and ?.
C~iesioner Shanahah ~oved, seconded by Co~d~issioner Huee and
carriedun~ni~usl¥, to close the public hearing.
C~lee~oner Shanahan ~oved, eeconded by Commissioner Huee and
carried unanimously, that Petition AV-90-014 be approved ~ubJect to
.. ~nd~ent of the resolution and the conditions iaposed, as described
above,.-.thereby adopting Resolution 91-134.
Page 7
R~SOLUTION 91-135 ~ PETITION PU-90-26o DR. 17ENO 3. SPAGNAo
REPRESENTING UNITY FAITH MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH, REQUESTING
PROVISIONAL USE 'a# OF THE ESTATES ZONING DISTRICT FOR A CHURCH AND
CHURCH KELATED FACILITIES, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
$9TH STREET $.W. AND JUST SOUTH OF THE CHURCH OF THE GATE, IN GOLDEN
~ATE ISTATES - ADOPTED SUBJECT TO PETITIONER'S AGREEMENT SHEET
February 5, 199!
Ron Ntno, Planning Services, presented Petition PU-90-26, a
request for a Provisional Use (PU) for a church within the Golden Gate
Estates area. He advised this petition was unanimously approved by
the CCPC at their public hearing on 1/17/91. He reported it ts con-
a/stent with the current Growth Management Plan, however, will be
inconsistent with the proposed Golden Gate Master Plan. He said Staff
has determined this project will not measurably impact traffic in the
single-family area because the site is immediately accessible to C.R.
951. He concluded that Staff recommends approval of Petition PU-90-26
· subject. to the stipulations listed in the petitioner's Agreement
Sheet.
Commissioner Hasse questioned if this petition is approved, what
will happen upon implementation of the Golden Gate Master Plan?
Planner Ntno responded that even with approval of the PU this date,
the proposed language of the Master Plan stipulates a Development
Order cannot be issued for inconsistent properties. He said the peti-
tioner is aware of that condition and will attempt to address the
problem with the Board at a later date.
Commissioner Saunders commented the Board on January 29th, stated
that applications filed up to a certain point in time would be con-
sidered as a matter of policy under the current Golden Gate Master
Plan; therefore, Development Orders will be consistent as long as they
are consistent with the current Plan.
Commissioner Volpe inquired if the intent of the petitioner's
agreement includes the necessity for applying for a new PU if they
wish to expand the church? Planner Nino explained that any new acti-
vity, including an enlargement of the church over and above 300 seats,
will be subject to a new PU application for the expanded or additional
32
Page
,~."-~ i area.
Dr. Neno Spagna, representing the petitioner, indicated he is
Nester Plan, however, recluestad the Board grant the PU under the con-
dittons specified in the existing ordinance.
Conuntsstoner Volpe mentioned a church lies immediately to the
north of the subject site, and asked if any consideration has been
given to shared access between the two facilities, to which Dr. Spagna
explained that property can be purchased in that area for less than in
Naples, and the County may find sites being taken up by those who do
replied in the negative.
George Keller, President of the Collier County Civic Federation,
Indicated his support for this church. He suggested that the Board,
In the future, require an affidavit from petitioners stating the
number of members who live in the Golden Gate Estates area. He
I!~:!?f. not live there, which will limit residents from requesting their o~n
I.~$[;i[.~:'Gerald MacKenzie Indicated it has taken members of this church a
very-long time and much hard work to get to this point in the process
of building their church. He asked the Board's assistance in making
their.dream a reality.
Cc~aissioner Saunders ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Goodnight
·nd ~rried unanimously, that Petition PU-90-26 b~ approved ~ubJect to
~ Pttttlg~lrts &g~eelent $h~t, thereb~ adopting Resolution 91-135.
Page 9
February 5, 1991
10510 A.M. Reconvaned~ 10:15 A.M. at which
~W Clerk Arrighi replaced Deity Clerk ~u~ln e~e
I~BOLUTXON 91-~36, R~ PETITION PU-90-23, TERRANCE L. I~PPLE OF BRUCE
~ & A3SOCIATES, INC. , ~P~SE~XNG DELTONA ~XLXTXES, INC. ,
~Q~STING ~OVISION~ USE "b" OF SECTION 8.~0 (ESSE~IAL SERVICES)
~IN ~ ~F-4 ZONING DIS~ICT FOR ~RSE OSMOSIS WATER ~~,
STO~GE ~ ~ING P~ ~ ASSOCIATED FACILITIES FOR PROPER~
~A~D SO~ OF LILY CO~T ~ ~TING ~E S0~HE~ PORTION OF
CO~I~ CO~ ~ ~E P~ - ~OPTED WI~ ~ED ~ ~DITION~
Planner Arnold informed that that two week ago the Board heard the
subject petition, and resulting from that meeting was the direction to
staff to evaluate alternative sites. He provided to the Board a writ-
ten report analyzing five alternate site locations. He pointed out
that the sites are all commercially zoned; however, staff did check to
see if these sites could be engineered for a water treatment facility,
whether distribution could be handled from these sites, or whether the
lots were for sale. He noted that staff did confirm that each of
the a/ternate sites were vacant, zoned commercial, and inspected to
see if any residential properties were adjacent to them or how far the
sites were from the residential properties. He summarized that of the
five sites listed, the two noted as the best possibilities for a plant
such as the one proposed are listed as Site A and Site B. He
explained that Bite A is on Bald Eagle Drive and is on a C-4 zoned
area, and Site B is located on the corner of Lambert Drive and Elkcam
Circle and is zoned C-4. He pointed out that there are no adjacent
residential homes to Site A or B.
In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Arnold affirmed that the
~ same analysis was not performed for any of the alternate sites as was
for the original one in question.
Mr. Arnold stated that be'has received a letter from an attorney
for an adjacent property owner to the subject site reaffirming their
objection to this petition.
Mr. Arnold disclosed, in answer to Commissioner Volpe, that staff
feels that the noise and odor concerns have been properly mitigated by
buffering and noise suppressant equipment and odor eliminating equip-
Page 10
· on-the subject site.
February 5, 1991
Commissioner Shanahah pointed out that in the study provided
regarding the acoustical survey and analysis it states, "in any event,
feel certain that with the windows closed In any nearby home and
with the air conditioning on, the sound from the proposed RO facllity
will not be noticed", and questioned what this statement means.
Don Pickworth, representing Deltona Utilities, provided for the
?.',. record a transcript of the January 22, 1991 meeting before the Board
of County Commissioners and a site report dated February 1, 1991 and
dlate need for an upgrade of the water treatment facilities and water
supply facilities on Marco Island, and the proposed site is the best
location possible for the RO plant to address these needs. In
response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Pickworth confirmed that the sub-
Ject site Is owned by Deltona. He stated that based on the presen-
tation given on this petition on January 22, 1991, it can be noted
attached Marco Island 10-Year Water Planning Study dated January 1991.
Mr. Pickworth noted that Mr. James Maloney, Vice-President of
Voice LaGter Incorporated (phonetic) will respond to Commissioner
Shanahan~s question. Mr. Pickworth reported that there is an tmme-
that the proposed plant on the subject location will be a good neigh-
bor. He specified that the originally requested site will pose the
least disturbance to the residents of Marco Island because there will
be no piping required or a st~niftcant system modification necessary.
He related that the subject site If approved will be able to provide
water to the residents of Marco Island by November, 1991. He pointed
out on the display map the other five alternate site locations, and
no,. that every site listed .111 need a provisional use and allwill
present their own problems
Co~lsstoner Volpe ~esttoned tf an amendment has been made to
th~ p~tttton retesting the two additional storage tanks discussed at
the meettnff of January 22, 1991. He pointed out that the visual
display does not show any additional tanks; but stated that more
Page 11
February 5, 199!
!~i;i"tmportantly by adding the tanks, would this petition have to go back
before the CCPC for review? County Attorney Cuyler responded that he
will check this.
James Maloney of Voice LaGier Inc. commented that the statement
mentioned by Commissioner Shanahan was basically a caveat. He stipu-
lated that the noise level at the proposed site will not exceed the
Collier County Noise Ordinance of 55 DBA allowable limit for night
time use. Commissioner Shanaban declared that if the best way to get
sound control is by having to close the windows, then this is not
acceptable. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Maloney advised
that within reasonable costs restraints, Deltona has done everything
order for a cinder block wall which was mentioned at the January 22,
1991 meeting to be effective, it would have to be 25 feet high because
an 8 foot wall would not contain the noise coming from a 22 foot high
building. He noted that there are very elaborate pump enclosures
available, but these are very expensive. Mr. Maloney emphasized that
the difference in DBAs from what already exists at the property line
:..:.. of the closest resident from the proposed site would be approximately
:i['..~ 3 to § DBA which ts barely audible to the human ear.
Bill Conltn, Vice-President and Manager of Stone and Webster's
Water Technology Division, Indicated that the petitioner will, if
:' . required, spend the extra money for further acoustical barriers.
Commissioner Saunders commented that if tt is not necessary, the Board
is not requiring the company to spend additional money on this. Mr.
Conltn referred to a letter provided to the Board from another plant
he designed similar in size which was located even closer to a resi-
dentis property line, which stated that there have been no complaints
regarding odor or noise.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conltn affirmed that the
building is of CBS construction and will be 99~ screened from view.
Mr. Conlin noted in answer to Commissioner Hasse that there are
two existing wells on the existing site and will be used with the
Page 12
February 5, 1991
reverse osmosis plant. He added that a third well is permitted to be
built. He commented that the pumps used are submerged 200 feet down
]./ which will produce no noise.-
Mr. Conltn stated that he looked at seven alternate sites and
~": three of these could be feasible~ however, pointed out that these
alternate sites are only 2-1/2 acres where the proposed site has 8
acres and allows the facility to be set back considerably from the
property line. He related that in order to put the piping in to any
of the alternate sites would create a considerable disturbance to the
residential area. He disclosed that by having to move to one of the
alternate sites, the facility will cost an additional $3 to $6
million which is explained in the breakdown provided to the Board. He
remarked.that the biggest negative impact in having to move the faci-
ltty would be that no water would be available for use until 1993, when
it could be available from the subject site by November 1991. He
. concluded that the proposed site is the best location for the reverse
li~i?~~ In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conlin stated that there
.re no safety Issues involved in the plant, and explained that
I~:'~ the reverse osmosis plants in Florida are in residential areas and
[~:~,::~:. there have been no safety problems Involving them outside the property
~ ~,.:.~.'. '.
Chuck Wood, Vice President of Planning and Engineering for
Southern States Utilities, stated that there is a continuing need for
for capacity on the island. He pointed out that in August of 1989 the
Board of County Commissioners adopted a resolution encouraging Marco
Island Utilities to move forward in designing and installing a reverse
osmosis facility on the island. He noted that since acquiring the
utility about eighteen months ago, active steps have been taken in
trying to accomplish this goal. He explained that the process has
proceeded in a very open manner, keeping the public Informed at all
~times. He emphasized that the proposed location has not been kept a
secret from the community. He advised that at this time everything is
Page 13
.ready to begin construction so the plant can go on-line by November,
w~ll be no additional costs passed onto the customer. He related that
the existing wats= facili~es ace being used to their full capacity
susceptible to failure.
Mr,~ Wood confirmed in response to Commissioner Volpe that his
utility does h~ve a water conservation program in place on Marco
Island as far as informing the people to conserve on water, but it is
not built into the rate structure.
The following people spoke against the approval of the subject
petition:
Robert Duklauer
Robert Sitere
George Keller, President of Collier County Civic Federation
Ed Mullaney
The following reasons were given for the request for denial of the
subject petition: The Planning Commission did deny the subject
request; before placing a plant of this nature in a residential area,
all alternate sites should be reviewed completely and In-depth; there
are alternate sites available that would accommodate the proposed
plant; although there is a need for more water facilities on Marco
.Island, it is not felt that it is at an emergency level; there are
other.water sources available for the Islands use which could produce
up to 11.8 million gallons of water per day; DER, who inspected the
existing water facility on August 28, 1990, indicated that this faci-
lity is in good condition; a plant with the potential to produce
noise, toxic fumes, and other risks should not be placed in a residen-
tial surrounding; submittal of a petition requesting dental of subject
Imposed before resorting to building a plant such as the one proposed~
Page 14
petition signed by 70 people in the area of the proposed plant= possi-
bility of the proposed facility expanding; more conservation should be
February 5, 1991
and photos taken and provided for the record show that the proposed
plant is not a good neighbor.
The following people spoke in favor of the proposed petition:
Charlotte Westman, League of Women Voters in Collier County
The following reasons were given for support of the subject peti-
tion: The Marco Island Fire Department Is in support of the proposed
facility; repair to the existing facility is critical; a substantial
amount of information has been provided continually to the citizens of
Marco Island informing them of the proposed facility and site; the
Growth Management Plan provtdes that essential service facilities can
be allowed in residential area, and water treatment facilities are
considered essential service facilities; the facility proposes to have
~-f ~, ~.the most technologically advanced air quality control equipment in
~?~. order to capture and eliminate sulfur odors generated through the
water treatment process; the other reverse osmosis plants in Florida
of which 80~ are in residential communities have had no problems~ and
there is a real need for this plant as soon as possible.
Commissioner Hasse noted that he feels there is a need for more
usable water on Marco Island, and since the proposed facility will not
be changing the use that already exists on the site, he is in favor of
the subject petition.
County Attorney Cuyler responded to an earlier question raised by
Co~tssioner Volpe regarding the two tanks noted on the site plan. He
Informed that these two tanks were not part of the petition presented
to the CCPC; therefore, the Board can ask the Petitioner to clarify
that they are not part of the petition. Nr. Pickworth cohented that
these tanks at a later date, he accepts the petition presented without
them.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Pickworth stated that the
site plan does relocate the proposed buildings 7.5 feet closer to the
Lee County utility, but the change is not reflected on the agreement
Page 15
· February 5, 199!
sheet..
Mr. Con/in commented in response to Commissioner Shanahan, that
there have been no reported deaths or illnesses regarding the hydrogen
sulfide used at any of the existing reverse osmosis plants.
Ce~tee~ner N~se ~v~d, ~econded by Co--issionsr Volpe, that
P~ti~i~n PU-90-23 be epprc~d, ~ubJsct to Staff~s sttlmlattons and the
,~:, ~.~t~d&b~rv~, thereby adopting Resolution 91-136.
Commissioner Saunders question the petitioner regarding installing
an eight foot wall around the site as well as the vegetated buffering,
to which Mr. Pickworth stated the petitioner agrees. Planner Arnold
pointed out that the Zoning Ordinance restricts fence heights to six
feet.
Commissioner Saunders requested that the petitioner apply for a
variance to' allow for the eight foot wal! which replaces the chain
link fence required in the agreement sheet, and have the petitioner
work with Staff as to the best location for the fence for protection
and aesthetic purposes. He stated that he assumes that The petitioner
is willing to take all the additional steps reasonable to reduce the
noise level. Mr. Pickworth pointed out that if they cannot keep the
''~:~.-' -noise ·below the 55 DBA level then they will Install additional noise
'~?e:' < prevention methods. ~ .:,.
In response to Commissioner Volpe's inquiry regarding the removal
of exotic vegetation on the site, Mr. Arnold stated that this will be
done in a phased schedule to allow proper natural buffering to grow to
its intended height. Mr. Arnold indicated that the lan~ruage provided
in the agreement will be reworded regarding the removal of exotic
vegetation.
~..
~'~'::' Commissioner Shanahan explained that he will vote against the
',,..- motion because he feels this is an intrusion on the property owners of
a residential neighborhood. He stated that alternate sites should be
~i/;. ' investigated thoroughly.
~C&11 fo~ the question, the ~otion carried 4/1 (Co~aissioner
Page 16
CAI~IV~, F~NIT 91-1, R~ PETITION C-91-1, BARBARA NAINSTKR OF THE
!t~DL~I~ID~ CRItlSTIAN MIGRANT ~SOCIATION, RKQUKSTING A PERNIT TO CONDUCT
A CA~IIIVar. FRON 11~BRUARY 25, 1991, THROUGH NARCH 3, 1991, ON THE
II~!Ol~J~R CHILD D~L0~ C~I~TER SITE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HAIN
STR~FT (S.R. 29) B~IW~ 4TH STREET NORTH A~D 5TH STREET NORTH -
Planner Arnold stated that as part of the request for the carnival
permit, the petitioner has asked that the bond requirement be waived.
Co~LtNion~r Saundere ~d, eeconded by Conieoloner Hasoe and
that Petition C-91-1 b~ approved with the w~tver
of the o'ur~ty bond,. thereby ~a~opting CamAro! Per~it No. 91-1.
Page 17
February 5, 1991
**$:~teo~ 12~45 F.H, - Reconv~ned: leO0 P.M. at which
'~t't~ Deputy Clerk ~uevtn replaced Deputy ClerkSright ***
OGC C&SE.NO. 90-0315 Dg~ A VALID PUBLIC EMERGENCY, THEREIN
AUTROF~ZIII~ ~T~ ~ SH0~-LZST ~IFZZD Yl~ TO P~O~
~~ S~CKS TO ~rlL~ ~ P~IT OBligATIONS ~ nOWAY
County Hansget Derrill presented a request to declare an emergency
and allow Staff to receive a short-list of firms to do special
environmental work to fulfill mitigation requirements of recent DER
dredge and fill permits.
Co=mtsstoner Volpe questioned how the violations occurred7
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald replied the viola-
;~' :- tatned with a recovery rate over a period of three years.
tiens under six contracts occurred in two fashions. He said the miti-
gation measures were, In fact, implemented on three sites but over a
period of years, they were not maintained. He Indicated DER Is now
requiring not only the environmental mitigation, but It must be main-
He said the
proposed mitigation was not performed on the other three projects
because the County wanted to combine all those mitigation measures
into.one contract, which Is what is being requested this date.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Archibald replied that typt-
cally, substantial mitigation Is Included in the construction
contract. He asserted because of what the DER is now requiring, the
next step is to have the contractor do the installation and have an
outside consultant monitor that activity.
Mr. Archibald clarified for Commissioner Shanahan that the
period of three years.
Ce~mAemton~ Shanahah moved, seconded by Couutsstoner Hmose and
c rried-unm tmmsl¥, that Cue No. 90-0315
Page 18
~.ii::' ~M~11~ FJ~ZT, ZTZ~$ AG~JIT .. FOR PARADZ$!.I~IRTg - JLPPROVIID
?
I~!T~ c.e~f.e~l :-unfmiBously,
County Manager Dotrill noted the three party agreement for sewer
facilities for Paradise Pointe which had not been submitted with the
final plat at the last meeting, has now been reviewed by Stafff and As
being recommended flor approval.
me O9'
February 5, 1991
CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ~R ~ I~~
Jay Reardon, Emergency Services Administrator, updated the Board
on the services provided by the Immokalee Medical Assistance Program
during the first ftve months of the program's operation. He said two
methods of shuttle operation, an on-demand and a routine scheduled
service, have been tried. He stated it has been agreed by the medical
providers at the clinic as well as those involved with the program,
that the best method of service is two round trips scheduled daily.
He reported two vendors have made proposals and the least e~enstve
will cost approximately $112,230 for the twenty-four months the County
plane to continue running this program. He mentioned after numerous
meetings with the Sheriff~s Office, it has been determined that the
mobile command post will have a gre~ter use than originally expected
and will allow a mini-bus they currently use to be considered surplus.
He sa~d the Shertff'e Office is willing to transfer the bus to the
Immokalee Medical Assistance Program for use as a shuttle, allowing
the County to provide the service In-house at a cost savings of
$65,836 over a twenty-four month period. He also mentioned
fundraising efforts as of 1/30/91, have netted $8,S§2 through the
efforts of a large group headed by Reverend Klees and Father
Sullivan. He indicated that figure ~s over and above the $26,6~8
raised in 1990, and they are working extremely hard to raise their
pledge of $75,000 for this program.
County Manager Dotrill advised that the final executive summary
for the mobile command post is scheduled for February 12th. He said
part of the Sheriff~s wtllin~ness to transfer the mini-bus is predi-
cated on an agreement that the Sheriff will be able to co-use the com-
mand post. He cautioned if this item is approved this date, it should
be conditioned on the final disposition of the mobile command post.
Commissioner Shanahah communicated it is not realistic to expec~
Reverend Klees and Father Sullivan to raise $75,000 each year and
000 100
Page 20
:'~':" ' ' February §, 1991
Include that amount in the budget as funds the County expects to
;'~ ..receive. He suggested the Immokalee business community be approached
to help finance the program.
:~...George l:eller, Presi~ent of the Collier County Civic Federation,
stated.a minimum amount ~hould be charged for people using the ser-
~,.. vices of the clinic, as well as for the shuttle transportation to
~ : Naples Community Hospital.
('. ~1o~e~ S]~nahan move~ to condtttonally approv~ St~f~
· ~" e'~'~tt~ ~nt~t ~n ft~ltzatton o~ the ~blle co~
· ~1~ for 2/12/91.
In ~er to Co~tsstoner Hasse County Manager Dotrill replied
~.. that the ehuttle v~ t~ available only to the Immokalee Cl~ntc. ~e
said a person in Golden Gate Estates who re~tres transportat/on by
~S to the hospital will receive a bill for that service.
Co~tsstoner Goodnight reminded the Board that the commitment to
, this pro,ram is only for a period of time lon~ enough for the hospital
:.:" ~d Collier Co~ty Health Services to come up with a plan to provide
the se~tces needed.
:: ....":: Mr. Reardon re~ested that the motion for approval Include reJec-
f~?.i. t/on-of the current proposals for the t~t Service as submitted.
~ ~1~ S~ ~dtn~ the ~tlon to include the
."' m,'~'tt ~ ~~ ~ C~s~t~er H~ae. U~ call for the
STAPT TO INF~TIGATE JOINT USE ARRANGEMENTS WITH THE Y.M.C.A FOR
OPEHATi~ ADDITIONAL ~OP~ATIONAL PROGRAMS OPEN TO ALL COUNTY
.KESID~F~S. AT COONT~ PA~]r_~ AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES - APPROVED
County Manager Dotrill advised that hie office has been discussing
with the Y.M.C.A the possibility of a ~otnt use concept to have the
Y.M.C.A supplement County Staff and programs of a recreational nature
at community park sites throughout the County. He satd he is
interested in this idea because of his. continuing concern with the
ability of the County to appropriate funds of an operational nature in
support of the County park program. He stated the County also is on
Page 21
I~?~,?c February §, 1991
the verge of having a good community park system and this concept will
enable use of the parks to be maximized. He Indicated the Y.M.C.A
will offer ~ increased level of recreaklonal programs ~ha~ are fee-
driven ~d t~tll nok entail any cost to the ad valorem or the general
Conunissioner Saunders asserted he will agree to the concept with
the condition that the programs being offered by the Y.M.C.A will be
open to anyone in the County.
County Manager Dorrill indicated his agreement, adding he will
return with a formalized agreement with the Y.M.C.A based on that
understanding.
.. Commissioner Volpe mentioned it would be helpful to know if
programs of this nature have worked successfully in other areas.
Gila Seavets (phonetic), representing the Y.M.C.A., reported he
has received written documentation from his national office indicating
this type of program is very successful and is on the increase. He
said some communities have gone to the extreme of building facilities
and turning them over to the Y.M.C.A under contract for management and
programming. He stated this program will be open to everyone in the
County because the Y.M.C.A is only the administrative agent who will
do the programming for the County on a cost basis.
Commissioner Volpe suggested this program also be explored with
the Marco Island Y.M.C.A, to which County Manager Dotrill agreed.
George Keller indicated his concern that the County retain a por-
'tion of the fees to be charged' by the Y.M.C.A in order to take care of
maintenance of the facilities.
...... Ce~ie~t~ner Saundar~ ~oved, ~econded by Conisstoner Shanahah ~nd
· ;-':.,, ~'ie~~l¥, to ~uthorize Staff to inv~stigatm Joint use
the Y.M.C.& for recreational progrm at County
facilities that will be open to everyone in the
PRZOP~TZZ~D S~ORT LIST OF CONSULTING ENGINEERS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
COUllT~-NIDE ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PER LOI #90-1652 APPROVED; STAFF
TO N~OTIATR CONTRACT WITH TINDALE-OLIVERAND ASSOCIATES AS #1 RANKED
Page 22
County Manager Dorrtll Indicated Staff Is recommending
Tindais-Oliver and Associates as the consulting firm to do the analy-
!~)i~!!:!!.i. of, transportation related costs to ~nclud. the County-wide road
assessment concept as well as an evaluation of the methodolo~z and
~o~ts of road related ~mpact fees that can be char~ed. He asked the
Board to approve the short l~st of consult~n~ engineers as follows:
· ~ - T~ndale-Ollver and Associates; ~2 - Bart, ~nlop, ~ Associates;
authorize Staff to negotiate a con~ract with Tindale-Oliver and
Associates as the number one ranked f~rm to be brought back to the
Board for approval.
Coatestoner Volpe cohented that information 1s available through
~n order to do the analysis.
Co~y ~age~ Do~tll Indicated it ts no~ ~ts Intention to pay
stde~atton wt~ be included as pa~t of the fee negotiations with the
consuitor.
· Co~tsstone~ Sa~de~s co~tca~ed hts support fo~ the eval~atton
related to road impact ~ees. however, stated he cannot svppo~t analy-
~ts o~ tie County-~tde road assessment a~ this t/me,
Co~ty M~ager Dorrill responded that the focus of the anal~sts
will be on the revision to the Ampact fee. He said he ~s proceeding
~der direction of the Board to do an analysis of impact fees with any
~bse~ent shortfall to be funded through a County-wAde assessment
Co~issloner Saunders stated has understandin~ that there may be a
co~ectAon between evaluating road Ampact fees and the ~alysAs for a
County-wide assessment distrAct, however, the Executive Sugary Ae
written in such a way that ~ may be perceived b~ the public that the
Co~ty As moving toward a Co~ty-wAde assessment distract. He
Page 23
Bj~!f~.,;, February 5, 199!
reiterated that he will not support a special assessment district
until he is convinced that there are no other alternatives to funding
the road shortfall. ~e sa~d there h~s been
relative to Rlternattves, and the Board has a commitment to ensure
they are all investigated.
Commissioner Shanahah agreed that tf there are other alternatives,
he will support them. However, he said, other solutions have been
discussed for many months with not one Identified to date. He stated
the time has come to determine how to correct deficiencies and how to
:. ~atntatn concurrency.
Commissioner Saunders concurred. further stating he will support
Staff's request this date, however. each of the Commissioners must
take up the challenge of Commissioner Shanaban to put all alternatives
on the table, explore and Implement those that can be implemented, and
only then look at a special assessment district.
George Keller suggested that approval of this item be confined to
evaluation of road impact fees.
Commissioner Volpe Indicated various phases are mentioned within
the Executive Summary and questioned what phase will be used in nego-
Assistant County Manager McLemore explained that the schedule as
"~' c°ntalned In the Executive sununary was In the °rtgtnal pr°p°sal' ~e
stated the County has since changed the scope of services at the
direction of the Board to simply develop enough information to tden-
ttfy..the gap In funds.
':? ,: Shanahah Bored, seconded by Co iesioner Hasas and
-- c~r~ied u~xd~ously, to approve the prioritized short list of engt-
¥:- nee~ta~-c~sult~ts, ~uthorizs Staff to n~otiats a contract with the
.'~: ..-. ~ z~ked fir~, return to th~ Board for final approval and ~xecutio~,
Staff to ne~otiate · contract with ~abors, Otblin &
P.&., for 1~1 es.Ices.
IMPLIMIIgT&TION STEPS FOR MASTER CONSULTIN~ SERVICES CONTRACT AND
ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION SKRVICKS DIVISION -
APPROVED CONSISTENT WITH AVAILABLE RKVKNUKS
000 , ,101
Page 24
February 5, 1991
" County Manager Dorrlll recalled when the Glaze Report was given in
December, 1990, 13 projects were identified that are running against a
very compressed time schedule between now and 1992 through 1993. He
said the Board acknowledged at that time, rather than build a complete
Staff, that construction program managers would be hired to handle the
bulk of the responsibility to deltve~ the road projects within the
concurrency commitments. He said interim financing has been prepared
at the Board~s direction, consistent with funds currently available.
He Indicated the scope of staffing has, therefore, been downsized with
the most crucial element being the necessity to retain a department
director who is qualified to handle the amount of road construction
programmed for the next two years. He stated the program has now been
reduced to eight positions in addition to the director. He advised it
is important to receive authorization to proceed in order to handle a
triple work load in the next five years.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, County Manager Dotrill responded
$365,000 will be allocated from reserves of Fund 313, with the other
interim financing of $13-millton coming from either some type of line
of' credit or short-term borrowing for which the County will pledge
excess gas taxes, pending completion of the engineering consultant~s
report that was approved in the previous agenda item.
Commissioner Volpe asked for an explanation of the Immokalee Road
project. Transportation Services Administrator Archibald replied that
the project is essentially complete and will be going to the construc-
tion phase. He said since most of the problems have been overcome and
the permitting should be completed, this will be an appropriate pro-
Ject for the consultant who will be putting the bid package together
and handling the construction Inspection
Commissioner Volpe mentioned it was his understanding that the
consultant would be handling the work of the design and permitting
stages.
County Manager Dotrill explained that very little activity is
taking place in terms of road construction for no other reason than a
ooo , .1o5
Page 25
~:'?'""~ /~" February 5, 1991
lac : of staff.
B'.,~!?:'-: Con. Isotoner Saunders Indicated h~s concern with hiring eight
/:' ~ople, asking what will their activities consist of and what will be
project management area will be involved with preliminary planning,
design and permitting; the special projects support sectton will con-
stst of people putting together smaller projects, from intersection
improvements and signal design, to the bike bath program and many of
the two lane roadways to be built; and the remaining people will be
doin~ the actual construction inspection work.
County Manager Dorrill further explained that the SiS-million is
primarily for construction of the three major projects that are ready
to go to construction. He said a small part of those funds will be
used for administration, with small portions funding salaries and the
master consultant.
Co.~te~tm~e= Shanahan~, secon~.ab7 Co,-,tsstoner Hasse and.
carrie~-~ly, to approve the t~plsmentatton steps for Master
Con~11/t~ Services Contract and the organizational i~pr~ts to
:~',:..:: ~ Tr~a~portmtlon Services Division, consistent with available rev~-
~. DX~ ~ ~ T~E ~RCK ~ ~RT ON ITS FI~IN~S
~ATION OF A P~N~ ~E AT ~OT B~ ~S~
County Manager Derrill reminded the Board that a parking fee pro-
posal for Barefoot Beach Preserve has previously been discussed, and
Is still pending. He stated a letter has been received from the
President of Lely Development Corporation expressing their concerns
relative to the cost betng Incurred on the part of the developer to
provide a'poltctng action at the beach. He reported members of the
public have also had associated problems, i.e., on several occasions
people have been prevented from access to the subdivision and told the
park was full when, in fact, It was not. He mentioned that the Park
Ranger program has only been partially funded this year, therefore,
000 , ,,106
Page 26
Commissioner Volpe questioned if Staff has a recommendation on how
to address the entire Issue? County Manager Dotrill Indicated there
are two options. He said there needs to be some type of presence at
the park for beach parking, similar to what is done at other County
parks. -He stated the County may contract with the developer to have
them provide the access and share the proceeds collected, with the
County administratively policing the arrangement and Park Rangers
i :. co ., ,o ,,.. ,. ,o
park -.
use over the Lely Barefoot Beach Boulevard easement to ~ain
unrestricted, public access to the park. He said the agreement is
conditioned that, once the park is full, the Board of County
Commissioners is =esponstble to police Its own parking lot for the
park...;~
John lgnellt, President of Lely Development Corporation (LDC),
clarified that in 1987, Collier County purchased 3,100 feet of pro-
perty from LDC. He said at the time the property was sold to the
County, special pains were taken to draft a use/access agreement bet-
ween the ultimate successors to LDC, namely the property owners, and
the County in order not to have the problems that are occurring now.
He s~mmarized what was agreed upon, adding LDC is Interested only in
seeing everyone involved live up to the agreement.
Commissioner Saunders recalled asking the County Attorney to
investigate how to maximize the number of parking spaces at this faci-
lity. County Attorney Cuyler concurred, adding he will meet with DER
and DNR to finalize that issue.
The following people spoke on this item stating their concerns
with<charging a parking fee; access is currently controlled by the
developer who keeps the public out by declaring the parking lot full
when it is not; the parking lot is never at full capacity; cars
000 107
Page 27
leaving the parking lot are not counted, only those entering; the
construction crews in the area are the cause of the litter, not people
frequenting the park; the rights of the general public over those
within the development:
....... · E~tl?. Maggio '
: ~ Marjorie Ward.
Alice Saylot
Commissioner Volpe asked Marjorie Ward, as a member of the
Citizens Association of Bonita Beach (CABB), if her group would be
willing to assist the County in making sure that access to the beach
:. is being properly manned and that the mechanism is being administered
fairly? Mrs. Ward indicated she will be happy to consult with the
Board of Directors of CABB and report back.
Commissioner Hasse commented that It seems from the reports given
· that the park has been declared closed many times when the parking lot
was not full. He asked what can be done to discontinue that practice?
Mrs. Ward suggested that whatever the outcome, the park must be
under County control, either by a human operator or a computerized
mechanism that will automatically count people coming In and leaving.
Commissioner Volpe communicated that the Co=~ty has a legally
binding agreement with LDC that the homeowners can control access at
Bonita Beach Road. He said what needs to be looked at is the "abuse"
at that road, and a gate at the entrance to the park is not the solu-
tion to the problem. He stated a cooperative arrangement is necessary
.between the public, LDC and the County to ensure the general public
has free access to that beach.
~*~ l~tF Cle:~ A~ri~hA replaced Deputy Clerk G~xevin at this tl~e ~e~
Paul H. Lapham, taxpayer of Collier County, stated that there
should be a proper sign stating that Barefoot Beach is open to the
public and a fee of $~.00 charged to park at the beach if parking
becomes a problem.
Paul Smith, resident of Lely Barefoot Beach, Informed that he and
the other property owners are paying an extra $25.00 per month for an
ooo
Page 28
February 5, 1991
extra ~uard because of traffic to the beach, and he does not feel
that it should be the responsibility of the residents of Lely Barefoot
Beach to pay for this since it is a County facility. He noted that
having the gate at the park entrance will not help in monitoring the
public from using the private roads and pools of the community. He
pointed out that the County taxpayers and/or a fee charged should pay
for the security and maintenance of the park for full time super-
vision.
Commissioner Hasse commented that it is the responsibility of Lely
Barefoot Park to monitor the people who may turn onto their private
roads.. He suggested that a gate be placed at the entrance of the park
with a County employee opening It in the morning and coming back and
locking-it at dusk.
Mr. Smith explained that they have one person to monitor the work-
men coming to do construction and the public going to the beach, and
are asking for assistance In directing the public to the beach because
the beach Is a County facility.
Commissioner Volpe questioned If there is an existing gate or will
there be a gate that will monitor the cars as they leave the park?
Mr. Smith replied that presently there Is no way of knowing who
leaves from the park, but a departure gate has been discussed.
George Keller, Collter County Civic Federation, noted that there
should be a sign indicating where Barefoot Beach is because it is a
public beach and does not belong to Lely Barefoot Beach community. He
claimed that the present location of the gate is preventing the public
from using a County facility that the taxpayers paid $3 million for.
He noted that a method needs to be developed to monitor the cars in
and out of the park, and tt needs to be controlled by the County. He
indicated that the most important issue is to make sure that there is
public assess to the beach.
Commissioner Goodnight recommended direction be given to the
County Manager to form a committee with a representative from the Lely
development, from the residents of Lely development, from CABB, and
ooo
Page 29
'(' ~ February 5, 1991
Assistant to the County Manager Plke~ and that this committee develop
recommendations to resolve the parking and security problems existing
at the Barefoot Beach Preserve and bring them back to the Board for a
deterainat Ion.
,,<,;-.;:': Commissioner Saunders pointed out that the problem is related to
cost,-. and recommended that the County Attorney meet with the County
Manager to determine the maximum number of parking spaces that can be
-.~ put at this facility. He stated that the legal Issue regarding the
gatehouse at Lely Barefoot Beach and the Improper use of the park
facility by the construction people needs to be reviewed. He advised
that it would not be proper to begin charging the $1 fee until there
are answers to these questions. He requested in regards to the issue
of controlling the parking problem which exists at the beach, that Mr.
Agnelll, Barefoot Beach Association President, be allowed to maintain
the park as they have tn the Interim with the commitment from him that
the public wtll be allowed into the park when there are spaces
available.
'.Commissioner Volpe concurred with Commissioner Saunders, and added
that in the review process an exit gate should be considered. He
pointed out that to have a County employee at the gate all day would
need to be cost efficient, and suggested that on a preliminary basis
the Lely Barefoot Beach Association or the Developer guarantee any
shortfall in collecting the $400 a week which would result in no cost
to the taxpayer. He emphasized that the legal issues have been iden-
tified, and the agreement existing between the County and Lely
Barefoot is valid. He noted that it is Important to address beach
access throughout the County.
Commissioner Volpe suggested that an agreement be made allowing
the collection of a $1.00 fee at the entrance to the Barefoot
Preserve, and If in fact the amount which is collected on a weekly
basis Is less than the amount that the County would be obligated to
pay, the shortfall would be covered by either the Association or the
Developer or in combination.
Page 30
February 5, 199!
Commissioner Hasse voiced concern regarding this suggestion
because it does not address the issue of who will be controlling the
Preserve. He suggested that for now the Preserve should be left open
-to the public.
Commissioner Volpe pointed out the existing agreement says that
the developer has the right to control access at Bonita Beach Road.
He asserted that the County is providing the service of controlling
parking at other County Beaches, and the issue of whether control of
parking ks needed at Barefoot Beach has been established, but the
question becomes who will pay for it.
Commissioner Hasse said he does not agree with charging a fee, and
added that the circumstances ~n this case are different because the
road. to the beach is controlled in part by a development.
County Attorney Cuyler concurred with Commissioner Shanahan's com-
ment that in the proposed ordinance, under items 6, 7, and 8, provi-
~ · sions are made that say the County will use the same operational
procedures that are enforced in other parks operated by the County.
Mr. Agnell~ informed that Lely Barefoot has been paying for addi-
tion security since the Park opened, and added that the Association is
willing to continue to subordinate the additional security, if
Commissioner Goodnightts suggestion of forming a committee to work out
the problems would be implemented. He advised that in the 1987
agreement with the County it states that if the parking at the
Preserve is full, the Association has the right to turn the public
away at Bonita Beach Road.
· Commissioner Goodnight pointed out that the proposed task force
should prepare recommendations regarding whether there should or
force ahould decide on some mechanism for monitoring both an entrance
~,.. · and exit gate so if spaces do become available the public will be
· '?-:' allowed in.
should not be a charge. She added that her feeling is that since
there is a fee charged at other County beaches, there should be one
charged at Barefoot Beach to be consistent. She noted that the task
Page 31
I~'"J' '*~"~)[i[ stated that he feel. there should be· fee charged to park at Bare,oot
that 60~ to 70~ of the cars parked there are from Lee County.
.Mr;', ~eller reco~ended that a ~e~ber fro~ the Parks and
Recreation Advtsor~ Board be part of the proposed task force.
· -~i~r ~tght ~, ~c~ed ~ Cmls~i~r S~,
· ~v/. ~d c~rrA~d unknit·sly, that · tuk force be for~ed comprising a
~tatAv~ o£ C~BB, Lely Corporation, District 2 Parks and
!te~-r~t/~ &dvi~ory Board ~aber, Lely Barefoot Beach &saoctatton
residsat,~Assletant County ~er Pike, and a Co~ateetoner; and that
this task force prepare · report with recomndattons for a
:~' solutAo~ to the m ~enttoned problm at Barefoot Beach Preserve
.~ ~/chwill be brought b~ck before the Board within three mks.
~t~r ~andere ~v~d, seconded by Co~aleetoner Shanahan,
~- ~ car~eduzmatmmsly, that the County Attorne~eet with the County
procedure should be taken to~axtmtze the
r~.~--- number: of pazIdng spaces that can be ~e rollable at ~ef~t ~h
Commissioner Shanahah suggested that an Investigation be made of
the agreement between the Audubon Society and the County.
.... · s$- ReceiptS,: 4:30 P.M. - Reconvened: 4:40 P.M. s**
;c~-~.tr~nVolp~ reconv~ned the ~ting in the absence of Chalrsmn
91-137, SH'I'fING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR FEBRUARY 26, 1991
P~ R~ I~I~ P~ ~ I~~ ~SKS~
Technical Services Supervisor Huber explained that on August 27,
1988, Resolution 85-182 creating the Pine Ridge Industrial Park Area
Improvement Assessment Dtstrtct was adopted by the Board of County
'Commissioners as was a tentative apportionment roll for the cost of
'the construction of the water main, sanitary sewer, road and drainage
Page 32
February 5, 1991
Irovemente for said dtstrtct~ and a public hearing is required to
":' update the tentative apportionment roll to reflect the current esti-
mated cost to construct the proposed improvements. He noted that the
proposed reeolutlon fixes the time, place and date of February 26,
I991 for th~s public hearing. He advised that the only cost asso-
ciated with the proposed resolution is the publishing and mailing of
~./)!*.'the notices of the public hearing which will be borne by the
.' 'Assessment District. He etated that staff recommends the adoption of
proposed resolution.
-'- ........Ce~one~:Saunder~ riored, ~econded bF Commissioner Shanahah and
~'-em-"z~"4/O'(~toner Goodnight out of the roo~), that the pro-
'~.~ ~'' ~.l"~lu~ton b~ ad~pted f~xing · time, place and date of Februar~
26, 1991-,"fmr a publlc hearingpertalntng to the P1ne Rldg~ Industrial
..... Park-Y:e~oem~t A~es~nt District.
Cha/rm~a-~oodn/g~t returned to the mttn~ at this time.
,?
OO0 , dl3
Page 33
February 5, 199!
-I~[M~Z~ ,EXItleES ON THE ARCHITECTURAL AGREEMENT FOR THE
~ F~OJE~'f IN THE AMOUNT OF 057,335 FOR INCURRED AND $10,000
Office of Capital Projects Management Director Conrecode explained
that since 1986 when the original architectural agreement was executed
for the new courthouse, the County has incurred a total of $57,335 for
reimbursable expenses and because they exceed $50,000 the reimbur-
sement requires Board approval. He added that these expenses are in
accordance with the contract.
Commissioner Volpe related that he has no problem with approving
]~. ' the incurred costs, but does not feel that the approval of $50,000 for
'future costs is Justifiable.
County Manager,Dorrill clarified that the reimbursable amount for
future.expenses can be changed to $10,000.
-. :C~iuto~ew Vo/pe ~ved, seconded by' Coltssioner Hassa and
..... -- "~arrled:v~ani~ously, that the reA~rarsable expenses for the architec-
~.' tural'~a~rs~ent for the courthouse be approved in the a~ount of
.~-z~..$§T,$a~:[o~-~tncurred expenses and $10,000 for future expenses.
91-83 TimOU,ir 01-8 , - ,ADOPTED
~se ~, seceded ~ Co~issioner Vol~ ~d
~~ly, t~t ~t ~n~nts 91-83 tM~h 91-85
I~IMG OF ~E DEFEASANCE ESCRO%~S ESTABLISHED FOR ~E
OUTSW~iNaar~s3ms~iN~soNo xssu~s zw 0ROSRT0 Re~LZZSSZT
SAVI~ OF AFPROXIMA~Y $148,000 - ,APPROVED
Finance Director Yonkosky explained this item is a recommendation
to proceed with restructuring.the escrows of three dereased bond
issues. He reported when the escrow was established, there were yield
restrictions, however, it is now possible to substitute the securities
already there with new types. He stated this will eliminate part of
the inefficiencies, therefore, enabltn~ a net savings to the Board of
approximately $148,000, after expenses for the financial advisor.
Page 34
February 5, 1991
· "~~A~er !~ ~, aeconded b~ C~ie~i~er S~ ~
~ ~1~ for t~ ~tat~ding r~nue re~ding ~nd
lm ~ ~r to realize net aav/n~ of a~rox/~tely 8148,000.
A~n~strat~ve Assistant F~lson state~ that eleven members an~ two
alternates need to be appointed by the Board to the County Government
Productivity Committee created by Ordinance on January 19, 1991. She
~:?,~: zens can serve on two boards.
informed that after advertising, 21 resumes have been received. She
advised that it has been recommended that five members be appointed to
serve a one year term and six members appointed to serve a two year
term. She pointed out that the name of Robert W. Byrne must be
withdrawn because he is a County employee.
Commissioner Saunders suggested that the Board appoint the eleven
members and two alternates, and let the committee members decide who
will serve the one year and two year terms.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Filson related that citi-
Commissioner Hasse recommended Brad Estes and Timothy Constantine.
Commissioner Goodnight recommended Pamela Cox and Donald York.
Commissioner Volpe recommended Franklin Baker, John Remington, and
Jamie Gutierrez. Commissioner Saunders recommended Zac Lucio and
Richard Laymon. Commissioner Shanahan recommended Patrick Neale and
,.,p,, .. Jm Kanter.
Saunders ~oved, seconded bFCo~aisaloner Shanahah and
c~zTA~-lm~m~m~ly, tJ~at John D. Remington, Richard S. La~mon,
·eale, Bra~Este~, Tt~th~J. Cstantt~, P~lm N.
Jan Eanter, Jamie R. ~utierrez, Zac R. Lucio0 and
Fr~nk/~n~tker be appointed u ae~bers to the Governsent Productivity
Oe~aA~eA~ Volpe ~oved, ~econded b~ Co~missioner Shanahah and
Page 35
:~:~ Co~isatoner Sanders redested that the County Hanager have the
I:?::~:~::, Comfy ~ager Dorrill noted that the first meeting has been .che-
'~y., duled and the coordinator will be ~tke HcNees, Budget Director.
i~::.Y Co~,..~o~er Sa,~ders po~ted out that two specific areas of con-
~:." cern for the co~ttee to review are the fleet s~tuatton and the pay
for rfor ce
~..~:-
~ ~-:,. ·
~.~
Page 36
February 5, 1991
It~m.-~l~ -
I~SOL~I'IO]I 91-1~9, APPOINTING COMMISSIONER MI~ J. VOL~ TO S~
~ A ~ OF ~ ~Y ~A~ ORG~I~TION - ~~
I:~dsmto~r S~m~ders mov~l, seconded by Co~tsstoner Sh~n~h~n ~nd
-,- --o~z~/~'~mam/mo~sl¥, that Co~m/ssion~r Volp~ b~ appointed to serv~ u
000 , ,125
Page 37
been received re~ardtn~ the award of the Pelican ~a¥ ~mprovement
~on~r~ b~ reconsidered.
Coutsstoner Volpe concurred that he too has received a number of
phone calls in reference to the manner in which the Pelican Bay
Improvement District landscaping contract was awarded with one being
from,one of the bidding contractors.
-~bei~ltcsnBay Xmprov~uent D/str/ct Landscaping Contract be recon-
In response to Commissioner Saunders, County Attorney Cuyler
stated that the motion Is proper because the contract has not been
executed. He Indicated that whether the County would be subject to a
fine is something that cannot be answered at this time.
County Manager Dotrill pointed out that this contract has been
subject to a bid protest.
Upon-call for the question, themot/on carried 4/1 (Commissioner
Commissioner Volpe questioned if In the intervening time the main-
.'.-: tenance services will continue to be provided by the current contrac-
tot?
Tom Conrecode, Director of Office of Capital Projects Management,
Informed that the current contract has been extended until 3anuary
1991. He added that action Is needed by the Board to extend the
current contract until the end of February.
seconded by Commissioner Volpe ~nd
carried~t~ousl¥, that the existing contract be extended until the
m 000,, 127
Pag~ 38
Co~ty Attorney Cuy]e~ Feaponded ~o Commlsstone~ Shanahan*o
?~- · ~es~on ~ha~ the r~hea~ng can be heard ~n two
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~SOL~ION ~ ~ OF DISSOLOmON
Assistant County Attorney Lawson noted that there has been a final
)'~.. summary Judgment issued and the former Board of Supervisors of PBID
has f/led a timely appeal. He informed that because there are consti-
tutional issues involved, the matter could go beyond the District
Court of Appeals; and the final resolution in the Florida State Supreme
direction from the Board is needed to proceed with the plan diasslu-
t/on as soon as possible since the State Legislature will meet early
Court could take another two years. He advised that the County
Attorneyts office is working with the law firm of Carlton and Fields
regarding this case. He affirmed that the Pelican Bay Property Owners
Association has Joined in the litigation in that they are adopting the
position of the former Board of Supervisors.
Mr. Lawson advised that the Board of County Commissioners could
win the litigation, but would have to yield the utility facilities in
the service area to the new city located entirely within the existing
Collier County Water and Sewer District which would be contrary to the
Boardts June, 1990, Resolution. He explained that Chapter 189 provi-
des that if a special District is dissolved, all the property owned by
that.pre-extsting special district passes by law into the hands of the
local general purpose government; however, if dissolution occurs
before an incorporation bill is passed by the State Legislature,
Collier County would be the the local general purpose government and
would receive title to the PBID utility facilities. He related that
~'.:: ....~T~'~l¥, to pro~ee~ with the appeal and direct Staff and
~-~,:' .....Counet[...to brings resolution and plan of dissolution back bofora the
,. .....~ t%~ rs~t~ ~! consi~ratton ~s soon u possible.
000
Page 39
Assistant County Attorney Lawson provided for the Board of County
Commissioners (not provided for the record) a synopsis of the Florida
Statutes as they exist today. He explained that Chapter 165 is the
.Formation of Municipalities Act which informs that the provision of
thts act shall be the exclusive procedure pursuant to general law for
forming and/or dissolving municipalities of the State. He added that
in Section ~65.041 it states that a charter for incorporation can only
be adopted by the State Legislature when a special act is passed which
provides that'specific standards have been met. }Is pointed out that
.:,' the standards are in five bastc areas and two of them are in question
in this Instance. He noted that one of the standards in question
deals with the population which states that there must be at least
5,000 persons in a specific area in a County of a population of more
than 50,000. He noted that it is debatable whether Pelican Bay has a
population of 5,000. The other standard, he said, that is in question
refers to the requirement of any area to be incorporated having a
minimum distance of any part of the area proposed for incorporation
from the boundaries of any existing municipalities within the County
of at least two miles or having an extraordinary natural boundary
which require separate municipal governments. He related that the
inoorporatlon of Pelican Bay for these said reasons would be contrary
to the standards set forward in Chapter 165. He recommended that the
Board of County Commissioners give direction as to whether it desires
staff and legal council to seek a dialogue with legislature and other
state agencies and/or seek a declaratory decree from the Court of com-
.. petent Jurisdiction to resolve the question of incorporation.
Commissioner Saunders stated that he does not feel it valid at th~s
:time to'seek a declaratory decree from the Court of competent ~urls-
diction.
Com~one= Shanahah ~oved, seconded bF Commissioner Volpe and
ooo 129
Pa~e 40
~t~ c~ ~ ad~eosed prior to the creation
~.'frn ~ Fo~t~n of ~cipaltties Act in e~ther Collier
C~W-o~.-~ State of Flor~.
Co~lssloner Shanaham skaked that he has questions regarding
whether enough t~me was spen~ considering the makeup oT ~he committee
'~d w~ta to m~e sure the board is functional with the voting mem-
bership as well as with the alternate membership.
Coutssloner Volpe suggested that the membership be expanded
Include fifteen members so all sections of the specific area can be
represented.
After discussion regarding Commissioner Volpe's suggestion to
increase the committee by four members, County Attorney Cuyler stated
that the ordinance creating the PBMTBU Committee would need to be
amended in resolution form to add the extra people.
Cm~iseloner Volpe moved, seconded by Co~tsstoner Shanaban and
carried 4/1 (Co~ntssioner Saunders opposed), that direction be given to
the County Attorney to amend the ordinance by resolution to allow for
a board of'fifteen~enbers for the PBMTBU Advisory Contttee.
County Attorney Cuyler commented that the resolution will be
brought back before the Board for consideration of additional members.
_-:BOARD:gFCOUNTYCO~!I$SIONERSt COMMUNICATIONS
Comatssloner Volpe requested that the County Manager update the
Board of County Commissioners in regards to the status of the negotta-
tAChS for acquisition of Marco island Airport.
Commissioner Shanahan questioned when the Board would receive a
report on the previous Items requested such as the Island-wide beach
000 , d30
Page 41
~.~.?!~!~:?!' February 5, 1991
~:11i:renourtshment. County Manager Dorrtll stated that if the Items of
~back to the Board, a~d other ltems will be placed o~ the a~e~da for
:?: Co~tssloner Goodnight noted that turn-around tlme on items in
question ls to be kept wlthln a four week perlod.
NOTE: .. Its. ,16H7 was removed from the co~se~t agenda a~d voted
upon separately as follows:
~~ON Off ~OC~ AG~~ ~N C0~R CO~ ~ ~ ~0~
Off ~SORS Off ~ ~T CO~~ D~O~ D~S~C~ - ~RO~D
, Co~atsstoner Shanaban moved, seconded by CommL,=stoner Hasse and
~,~.,~ ~ C~ ~/0 .(Co~on~ Vo~ ~n~d) e ~o ~p~ov~ ~h~ ~oc~
~/~.:~,. A~~t' ~en Collier Co~y ~d the Board of Supe~isors of the
Page 42
: ' February 5, 1991
· '''' Co~mtssioner Sh~n~han moved, seconded by Co~mtssioner
Hawse and carried unanimously, that the Consent Agenda
- be approved and/or adopted: ''*''
/tem#16&l
RESOLUTION 91-117 GRANTING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE,
WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "GRASSMERE AT
WYND~.,,,,t PHASE II# - WITH STIPULATION
1. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
See Page.~
Item #16A2
:* RESOLUTION 91-118 GRANTING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE,
'. WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "GRASSMERE AT
::.. tP/NDEMK]~Et PHASE I" - WITH STIPULATION
1. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
~. See Page./. .
~:~- Ztem,/6A3
· RESOLUTION 91-119 GRANTING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE,
· WATER AND SEWER IMFRO~S FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "GOLF COTTAGES AT
WYNDKME~Et PHASE III" - WITH STIPULATION
1. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
See Page ~i
Item'.#16A4'
RESOLUTION 91-120 GRANTING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE,
WATERAND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "VILLA FLORESTA AT
WYNDEMKRE~ PHASE II" - WITH STIPULATION
1. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
See Page .~
RESOLUTION 91-121 GRANTING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, D~INAGE,
~.~.S~ I~O~$ FOR ~ FIN~ P~T 0F "ROS~E AT
~" -.~ STIP~TION
I. Authorize the release of the maintenance security.
See Page ~', /~
Item #16A6
FINAL PLAT OF "LELY RESORT~ PHASE FOUR" -..WITH.STIPULATIONS
That the final plat not be recorded until the required impro-
vements have been constructed and accepted or until approved
security is received for the tncompleted improvements and
that construction shall be completed within 36 months of the
date of this approval.
Authorize the Chairman to execute the Construction and
Maintenance Agreement.
Page 43
February 5, 199!
recorded.
That final construction documents will not be approved until
Project Review Services receives the Red Cockaded Woodpecker
Management Plan approved by the Game and Fresh Water Fish
Commission.
see
~OL~ION 9~-~22 ~IN~ FIN~ ACCEPT~OE 0F ~ RO~AY, D~INAGE,
~:~'S~ I--O~S FOR 'LOTS ,-20 PORT AU PRINCE' - WI~
S~TION
Authorize the Clerk to record the satisfaction of mortgage at
the developer' s expense.
See Pages /~ 7-- /~
. Ite~:~16ASa . .'
RESOLUTION 91-123 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
~':: ABATEM~IT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT. 29, BLOCK A, BOND~
s ..rv!szgN, CAMPBELL . ,
... See Pages /~ ?-
~:' ~OL~ZON 91-124 ~0VZDZNG FOR ~SASS~ OF LZEN ~0R ~ COST 0F
~ OF ~LZC ~ZS~C~ 0N LOT 10, BLOC~
~0~0 C~L
Ztea ,26A8¢
See Pages /&/-- /& ~* , ,
I~ESOLUTION 91-125 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 10, BLOCK ?, CARSON'S ADDITION,
ALPHONSO CAMPBELL
See Pages
RESOLUTION 91-126 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABATeMENT'OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOTS 29 AND 30, BLOCK A, BONDURANT
SUBDMSION~ ALP~.ONSO CAMPBELL
See Pages 1&.5'-
Ite~,.~16ASe
RESOLUTION 91-127 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
ABAT~KNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOTS 19 AND 20, BLOCK A, BONDUR~tNT
SUBD~.V!~0N, ALPHONSO CAMPBELL ........
See Pages ,/&, if-,/~F
ltem~16Asf
:RESOLUTION 91-128 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF' LIEN FOR THE COST OF
'~:OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOTS 29 AND 30, BLOCK A, BONDURANT
SUBDIV~SION~ ALPHONSO CAMPBELL
Page 44
/70 ,
February 5, 1991
IrESOLUTION 91-129 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST 0F
"ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 30, BLOCK A, BONDURANT
SUBD.i'VISION~ A~PHONSO CAMPBELL
See Pages I~I'
I~SOLIrI'XON 91-130 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF ~IEN FO~ ~ CO~T OF
~~ OF ~LIC ~IS~CE ON LOT 32 BLOCK 4 OF
~D~SION, ~ W~, ~IS W~R ESTATE ,
See Page. /7~-/7~
~% Ite~,16A9
RESOLUTION 91-131 GRANTING PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY,
D~ATNAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF
"GLENDEVON AT WYNDEMERE" - WITH STIPULATIONS
Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit posted with the Clerk
as security for maintenance of the infrastructure until the
Board of County Commissioners grants final acceptance of all
improvements.
Preliminary acceptance of improvements wlll not become effec-
tive until water and sewer facilities have been conveyed to
Collier County Water-Sewer District.
See Page.i, / 7~,~--
f~vWATEI~'uLND:~EWERFACILITIES ACCEPTED FOR GLENDEVON AT WYNDEMEHE - WITH
'i~~'~- STIPV~T~QN~ ..........
1. The water facilities to serve the project cannot be placed
into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued
until the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation fur-
nishes a letter authorizing the placement of the sewer system
into service and approving the water distribution system for
service.
2. Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements.
The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been
sattsffed, and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting
the fire hydrant for ownership and maintenance.
OR Book ~ Pages
:.._ Ztem#16&11
.~c:.:. EXCESSIVE'SPOIL MATERIAL REMOVAL ALLOWED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OF
%J::'"'. "ARBOR TRACE" - IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 14~000 CUBIC YARDS
~'~. Iten#16B1
PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY, A PORTION OF WHICH
S]~%LL BE USED AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY AS REQUIRED BY THE~ONSTRUCTION
OF TH~ S-CURVE TRANSITION ROADWAY SEGMENT CONNECTING SANTA BARBARA
BOULEVARD FROM ITS EXISTING TERMINUS AT GREEN BOULEVARD WITH LOGAN
BOULEVARD IN THE VICINITY OF 14TH AVENUE SOUTHWEST
/7:,-
ACCEPTANCE OF TWO SIDEWALK AND TURN LANE EASEMENTS AND SUBORDINATION
AGREEMENT LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF G00DLETTE ROAD AND GOLDEN
GATE PARKWAY FROM KEVIN STONEBURNER
See Pages /~&-- /~
~ Item #16C1
CO~FOR OLDER AMERICANS ACT HOMEMAKING SERVICES RE BID 90-1667
~ TO QUE~N FOR A DAY, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $42,500 AND TO
?:.: *MEDICAL..P~I~SONNEL POOL IN THE AMOUNT OF $30,000 UNDER COLLIER COUNTY
to 2/12/91
to 2/12/91
*-. BID'~qA~D 90-1648 FOR REPAIR OF A GRAVITY WATER FILTER AT THE REGIONAL
:-WATEH:.TItE&TMENTFr. aNT RESCINDEDANDAUTHORIZATION 0FEMERGENCY
PURCHASE-OF FILTEr MEDIA FROM THE UNIFILT CORPORATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
Item,#16D2
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT CONVEYED TO FLORIDA PONER AND LIGHT
COMPANY, AND PERMANENT EASEMENT GRANTED TO FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT
COMPANY ON RECEIPT AND ACCEPTANCE OF A QUITCLAIM DEED FROM FLORIDA
POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AT THE SOUTH REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT
PLANT PROPERTY AFTER APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY
See Pages ~~) --~
l'~:~.:,r'.': ~:LIST OF QUALIFIED APPRAISERS FOR COUNTY APPRAISAL ASSIGNMENTS
See Pages
~Z:::..':Ite~-~16H3.,¢~nt/nued to 2/19/91
~.:.~.':~IFI~ OF C0~ION TO ~ ~ATORY SOLID W~TE COL~CTION
~:* ..... ~C~'.~SES~S ROLL AS ~S~D BY
It~~ ~1
SOLE-SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF NETWORK SERVICES FOR THE 5TH AND 6TH FLOORS
OF TH~;COI~RTHOUSE PROVIDED BY DZGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION AND AT&T
.1tem:#16H3-~eleted
Item#lGH&
Page 46
February 5, 1991
':BXDIIO,~gX-2676FOR M~DIAN'IRRIGATION FOR 00LDEN GATE PARKWAY
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS, PHASE II, AWARDED TO SUNNY GROVE LANDSCAPING,
=t~:.':.'.~_ BID_~90-167! TO ROTOTILL, RELOCATE AND SPREAD SOILS TO FINISHED
m~" GIUiDK.'FORMARCO ISLAND MEDIANLANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AWARDED TO RB
LANN $EI~FICESr INC. r IN THE AMOUNT OF.$14t?50.48
~,? ~N TH~ AMOUNT OF $1,229,072 B~ RESOLUTION AT & PUBLIC ~EAR~N~
u Ite~#lGHT re~ov~d from consent agenda for separate vote
';._-.::'.liESOLUTION 91-~32 APPOINTING MARJORIE R. SKINNER TO THE GOLDEN GATE
.:' PARKWAY BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
See Page: ~O~
Ite~ #I~IB
R~SOLUTION 91-~SS APPOINTIN~ DAWN LITCHFIELD AND REAPPOINTING EARLE
~ 'JOHN~ON TO THE COLLIER COUNTY HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY
OF. CORRECTION TO THE TAX ROLLS AS PRESENTED BY THE
1988 TAX ROLL
....... .,No. Date
295 1/23/91
1989 TAX ROLL
257/258 1/23/91
: 184/i87
1990 TAX ROLL
1/23/91
.EXTRA~G~IN.T!ME FOR INMATE NOS. 28046 AND 56599
S qos CO S DENCE - rILED
The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and/or
?~i/- referred to the various departmente as ~ndicated below:
i::. 1. Memo dated 1/9/91 to BCC from Debbie Arkins, Tax Deed Clerk,
re Tax Deed Property Certificate 1276-1983. Filed.
2e
Memo dated 1/10/91 to BCC from Debbie Atktns, Tax Deed Clerk,
re Tax Deed Property Certificates 1487-1983 and 1485-1983.
Filed.
Page 47
February 5, 1991
Memo from Barbara Everltt Bryant, Director, Bureau of the
Census, United States Department of Commerce, re Florida 1990
Population Totals. Copies to BCC, Neil Dotrill, Tom
McDaniel, Michelle Edwards, and filed.
Letter by Certified Mall dated 1/22/91 to Commissioner Hasse
from Robert G. Nave, Director, Division of Resource Plannlng
and Management, Department of Community Affalrs, re petition
filed by Sewell H. Corkran. Coptes to Nell Dorrlll, Frank
Brutt, Stan Litsing,r, and filed.
Dated 1/15/91 from J. Thomas Herndon, Executive Director,
Department of Revenue, Report of Fuel Tax Collections and
Distributions for FY 89-90. Copy to John Yonkosky, and
filed.
Copy to Chairman Goodnight of letter dated 1/23/91 to
Honorable Mary Ellen Hawkins from W. R. Trefz, P.E., District
Secretary, Department of Transportation, re Joint
Participation Agreement with Collier County for the disbur-
sement of funds for the S.R. 29 pedestrian overpass. Copies
to Neil Dorrlll, George Archibald, John Yonkosky, and filed.
Letter dated 1/22/91 to Chairman Goodnight from Robert L.
Patton, Controller, Collter County Tax Collector's Office, re
distribution of Current Ad Valorem Tax to the BCC after Tax
Collector's commissions. Copies to John Yonkosky, Budget,
and filed.
Dated 1/23/91 from the Land and Water AdJudtcatory
Commission, Case No. APP-90-016, Final Order of Dismissal re
Development Order 90-1 issued by the BCC for the Regency
Village of Naples DRI. Copy to Nell Dotrill, and filed.
9J
10.
11.
Agenda of 1/23/91, revised mlnutes of 11/28/90, and minutes
of 12/27/90, received and filed for the Parks and Recreatfon
Advisory Board.
Notice to Owner dated 1/23/91 to BCC and Great Monument
Construction Co., from AAA Steel Fabricators, Inc., under an
order given by Great Monument Co., for mfscellaneous metal
fabrications for Project #90412 a/k/a water booster pumping
station at 831 ?th St. SW, Naples. Copies to Nell Dorrtll,
Steve Camell, John Yonkosky, and filed.
Nottce to Owner dated 1/18/91 to BCC and H.D. Rutledge and
Son, Inc., from Coastal Construction Products, Inc., under an
order given by Hartford South, Inc., for waterproofing,
sealants, coatings, paint, 3M fir,barrier and other related
materials for Collier County Health Services. Copies to Nell
Dotrill, John Yonkosky, Steve Camell, and filed.
12.
Nottce to Owner dated 1/22/91 to BCC and H.D. Rutledge & Son,
Inc., from Acoustt Engineering Company of Florida, under an
order given by H.D. Rutledge & Son, Inc., for labor and
materials for resilient flooring for the Health and Public
Service BulldAng. Copies to Nell Dotrill, John Yonkosky,
Steve Carnell, and filed.
13.
14.
Notice to Owner dated 1/25/91 to BCC from Keyestone
Interlocking Paving Contractor, Inc., under an order given by
H.D. Rutledge and Son, Inc., for labor and/or materials and
supplies. Copies to Nell Dotrill, Steve Camell, John
Yonkosky, and filed.
Notice to Owner dated 1/24/91 to BCC from Krehltng
Industries, Inc., under an order given by Kevin J. Keyes for
I 000 Plf,[~l.'48 Page 48
February 5, 1991
":!i,i',~,'i'-'i--concrete and/or all other related building materials. Copies
'to Hell Dorrtll, Steve Camell, John Yonkosk¥, and filed.
I5.
Copy to BCC of letter dated 1/18/91 to Robert L. Clark, Role,
Montes & Associates, Inc., from Benjamin G. Pratt, Assistant
to the Director, Surface Water Management Division, Fort
Myers Area Office, South Florida Water Management District,
re Application No. 901231-?4, C.R. 846 Immokalee Road, Phase
I. Copies to Neil Dorrtll, John Boldt, Mike Arnold, and
filed.
16.' .' To BCC from Kathryn Lyn Lelb, Coordinator, Guardian Ad Lttem,
Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, copy of
Quarterly Report - 10/90-12/90. Filed.
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF ALFONSO
GIROTAm LOT 11, BLOCK 305 OF MARCO. BEACH. UNIT NINE ..
See Page ~/~
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF PAULINE B.
~A]~ISONm LOT 2~ BLOCK 276 UNIT 8 PART 1 GOLDEN GATE
See Page... ,~ //
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF JAMES E.
AND JENNY D. CLARYt JR.t LOT l?m BLOCK Em NORTH NAPLES HIGHLANDS
See Page ~/~
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF WILLIAM T.
EVESm JR.m LOT 8, BLOCK 363m .MARCO BEACH UNIT ELEVE. N
See Page,.
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF WILLIAM C.
AND CECILE L. THIBODEAUm LOT 5r BLOCK 250 UNIT ? PART -- GOLDEN GATE
See Page
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF GORDON O.
AND PATRICIA L. FISHER~ LOT 27r BLOCK 21~ UNIT 2 GOLDEN GATE
See Page
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF TIMOTHY
AND DEBRA S. FOX~ LOT 11~ BLOCK 68 OF MARCO BEACH UNIT 2
See Page ~/~_~ .,
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF J. W. J.
INVESTMENTSm INC.~ LOT 37~ BLOCK 81t GOLDEN.GATE UNIT NO. 3
See Page
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF J. W. J.
I~V]~~ INC.m LOT S~ BLOCK SI, .GOLDEN GATE UNIT NO.
See Page
S~XISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF THEO G. AND
ARTEMISIA D. THEVAO$, LOT ! AND SOUTH 45~ OF LOT 2, BLOCK 86, UNIT 3
PART -- m" ~OLDEN GATE
See Page ~/~
Page 49
February 5, 1991
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF OTMAR M.
NETZEltf TRUSTEEr LOT 14r BLOCK 343r MARCO BEACH UNIT l0
See Page
SATISPACTION OF LIEN FOR NUISANCE ABATEMENT ON PROPERTY OF FLORA ANN
CLOROF!FJ~A,, (WOLF} ~ LOT 8 OF BLOCK 2 NAPLES TWIN LAKE
See Page
;;;' ' · There-being no further business for the Good of the County the
meeting was,adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 5:30 P.M.
':. ~"i': ' -', BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO
'o '',,z0{~[' ~. GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL
" ~i - , ' Q2 - DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL
~s presented ~ or as corrected .
000 1t8
Page 50