Loading...
BCC Minutes 03/19/1991 R Naples, Florida, March 19, 1991 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REQULAR SZSSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Patricia Anne Goodnight VICE-CHAIRMAN: Michael J. Volpe Richard S. Shanahan Max A. Hasse, Jr. Burr L. Saunders ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk; John Yonkosky, Finance Director; Ellie Hoffman, Annette Guevin, and Wanda Arright, Deputy Clerks; Nell Dotrill, County Manager; Tom Olliff and Jennifer Pike, Assistants to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; David Weigel and Ramitc Manalich, Assistant County Attorneys; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Frank Brutt, Community Development Administrator; Ken Baginski, Planning Services Manager; WayI~e Arnold, Raymond Bellows, and Bob Mulhere, Planners; Kimberly Pollen, Environmental Specialist; Russell Muller, Engineering Technician; Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Lieutenant Byron Toml~nson, Sheriff's Office. Page , -4-'<. March 19, 1991 ~..~ -Tupe ~1' A_~ --~PRO~D NZ~ ~GKS Co~ootonor ~h~ moved, seconded ~ Coatestoner Ha~oe ~d c~rried un~nimou~ly, that the agenda be approved with the following Item #9H3 - To inform the Board of County Commissioners of receipt of an inspection report and suggested modification to Collier County's Permit Application No. 111926265 from the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation and request Board direction as to an appropriate response. Added. (Requested by Staff). Item #12D - Authorization for Chairman to write letters to members of Legislative Delegation expressing opposition to H.B. 2261 and S.B. 1522, which impose restrictions and con- ditions on local government's use of impact fees. Added. (Requested by Commissioner Goodnight). Item #12E - Discussion re Legislative Bills restricting the power of Counties to regulate billboards. Added. (Requested by Gommissioner Goodnight). 4e Item #12F - Request to waive tipping fees for clean up day for Plantation. Added. (Requested by Commissioner Goodnight). Item #16G1 - Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners declare mulch currently stockplied at the Naples Landfill surplus property. Continued to 3/26/91. (Requested by Staff). Item #8C - Robert Davenport regarding adequate public facili- ties. Continued to 3/26/91 (Requested by County Attorney). NOTE: Item #9H2 to be heard at the conclusion of the regular agenda. Ite~#3A CONSENT AGENDA - APPROVED AND/OR ADOPTED The motion for approval of the Consent Agenda is noted under Item #26. c% wwx,$ REPORT - APPROVED The motLone for approval of the Clerk's Report is noted under Xt~ ~11AI ~md ~11A2. Xtra4 MZNUTT~ OF THE R~GULAR M~ETING OF JANUARY 15, 1991 AND SPECIAL MEETING OF J&NUARY 15r 1991- APPROVED AS PRESENTED Commissioner Shanahen moved, seconded by Commissioner Hesse and c~rrled unanimously, that the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 19, 1991 Jmnu~ 15. 1991 mnd the Special Meeting of Jmnuar¥ 15, 1991, be appr~ve~ u presented. USA - "YOU SUPPORT AMERICA DAY" PROCLAMATION (DESERT STORM) - ADOPTED Before reading the proclamation, Commissioner Saunders stated that it would be an excellent opportunity for all of Collier County to honor the Desert Shield/Storm troops in addition to all past, present and future veterans. He suggested that the North Naples Community Park be dedicated as a veterans park, to honor all veterans on Memorial Day. In addition, he suggested that there be community involvement to determine the type of monument, plaque, etc. to be used to dedicate that park and to have a fund raising effort for that pur- pose. Cowriesloner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Hesse to direct Herb Luntz to coordinate this effort with several other organi- zations that are attempting to find ways to honor all the veterans. Commissioner Volpe recalled that last week when the issue was discussed, it was suggested that Martha Skinner take the leadership role in this regard. Commissioner Saunders indicated that he has no major concern as to the coordination, noting that there are many orga- nizations that are looking for something to do in this respect. Co~/eeloner Shanahmn amended his mot/on to reflect that Mr. Luntz work closely with Mrs. Skinner and the Veterans Service Office to acco~lieh this task. Commissioner Hesse accepted the amendment, and the motion ca~rted unanimously. Commissioner Saunders read and presented the USA - "You Support America" Day Proclamation to Herb Luntz. He advised that Mr. Luntz will be serving as the master of ceremonies and rally co-chairman. Co~ulestoner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Haasa and cmxTled unmnt~ousl¥, that the proclamation designating Saturday, March 2S, 1991, u USA - "You Support America" Day be adopted. Commissioner Goodnight stated that many celebrations will be taking place throughout the nation and the President has requested 09 Page 3 March 19, 1991 that something very special be done for the 4th of July. She cited concerns relating to those men and women who will not be home at that time and noted that she previously suggested that when the service people are home, that they come before the Board to give the Commission the opportunity to shake hands with them. She asked that if anyone having the names and addresses of these military persons, that these be forwarded to her so that she could write them a letter and reqllest that they come to the Commission meeting when they are here in Collier County. Page 4 March 19, 1991 RESOLUTION 91-254, APPROVING THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ESTIMATED COST~ A~D TENTATIVE ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE EUCLID AND LAKELAND AVENUES ROADSIDE IMPROVEMENTS MUNICIPAL SERVICE BENEFIT UNIT - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published In the Naples Daily News on February 24, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider the confirmation of Resolution 91-156, passed and adopted by the Board on February 12, 1991, ordering the construction of roadside improvements described therein known and designated as the "Euclid and Lakeland Avenues Roadside Improvements Assessment District." Transportation Services Administrator Archibald advised that this item is a public hearing to consider a resolution to approve the plans, specifications and tentative assessment roll for the Euclid and Lakeland Avenues Roadside Improvements Municipal Service Benefit Unit. He explained that th~s resolution will be confirming Resolution 91-156, adopted on February 12, 1991. He also requested that the Commission approve the ordering of construction and the financing of same. He reported that today's hearing will be the final step in pro- ceeding with the bidding phase and financing of this pro3ect. Mr. Archibald explained that the district boundaries of the sub- Ject project incorporate much of the lands in and around Willoughby Acres and include the majority of property in Section 24, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. He related that the premise of the district boundaries is to include all properties that will have access to CR-846 via Lakeland Avenue or Euclid-Avenue. He indicated that this is primarily a project that will improve the aesthetics and entran- ceway for all the properties that use those two roadways to gain access in that area. He noted that if the large roadside ditches will be enclosed, the overall driving safety will also be improved. Mr. Archibald remarked that there are drainage improvements that will result from this project, which will improve the ability to remove the water. Transportation Services Administrator Archibald addressed the cost ].2, Page 5 March 19, 1991 estimate associated with this project, as outlined in the proposed resolution. He Indicated that the assessment roll which is included is based upon a total project cost of approximately $990,000 and is allocated to 1,216 equivalent dwelling units. He explained that the cost per dwelling unit would be approximately $?40. He related that the undeveloped parcels will be assessed at a ratio of 2.5 units per acre per § acre parcel. Mr. Archibald advised that there are a large of number of 5 acre tracts in this area and noted that 6 letters of objection have been received with regard to the assessment. He offered four areas for consideration for possible revision to the assessment roll. He indi- cated that the Palm River Basin intersects a number of the 5 acre par- cels that are yet to be developed and in certain cases It is doubtful whether those tracts may be developed at the current RSF-3 zoning, and there are few parcels that would not be able to be developed at all. He explained that It may be appropriate to consider reducing those allocations of dwelling units. Mr. Archibald reported that there is one multi-family parcel designated for 90 units which should be subject to reduction. He Indicated that the benefit of this parcel on an equivalent unit basis would be reduced by 50~ or more. Mr. Archibald pointed out that another case for possible reduction is a single parcel on the northeast quadrant of the improvement district boundary. He explained that this parcel has access to Livingston Road, Is currently undeveloped and if Livingston Road is completed as scheduled, the primary access will not be through Willoughby Acres and accordingly, the assessment for this parcel should be reduced or waived in total. Mr. Archibald spoke to an adjustment to the overall assessment roll calling attention to parcel of property at the southeast corner of the development that currently has been developed for single family use and that developer has constructed improvements along his fron- tage. He related that those improvements represent a substantial ~arch 19, 1991 benefit to the district itself, and accordingly, those parcels should be adjusted. Commissioner Volpe questioned whether the affected property owners have the ability to pay the special assessment over a period of time rather than a one time payment, to which Mr. Archibald replied that all the financing issues have not been worked out at this point in time, but noted that he expects that there would be some type of time frame by which payment could be made, I.e. 3 to 5 years. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Archibald reported that the total number of units to be assessed would be reduced from 1,Rl$ to 1,02§. He stated that even if the total number of dwelling units to be assessed is changed, staff will do everything they can to assure that the construction costs are reduced in order to keep the assessment in line with the roll that is presented today. Commissioner Goodnight advised that she received a letter from Ellwood Wltt, who spoke to this item last week, and submitted same for the record. The following persons spoke in favor of the proposed project: Mr. Jack Pointer Mr. William Kemnitzer Those persons speaking in favor of the project, cited the following: the problems regarding safety and the ditches on Euclid and Lakeland will be resolved and they will no longer be a mosquito breeding haven; additional safety for the older folks walking on the roads and children waiting for school buses; no one should object to providing safety for children and adults in this area. Mr. C. A. Murphy stated that he is representing Mr. and Mrs. NIcola who own 5 acres of property north of Willowick Drive which is the east/west northern boundary of where the improvements are to take place. He indicated that his clients will be paying $1,600 per acre to comply with the plan as set forth, and noted that no one lives on this property. He explained that these people are unable to get to their property because there is an easement that was not obtained. He P.ge 7 March 19, 1991 cited that this is an unreasonable expenditure. He related that his clients believe that this is an unfair levy on them when improvements are limited to the area that is now improved south of Wtllowtck Drive. Gommissioner Saunders suggested that Mr. Archibald meet with Mr. Murphy to obtain the exact location of the property. Mr. Archibald replied that this property Is Parcel 103 and it Is on the llst for possible reduction. He related that this property is currently being assessed for 11 dwelling units and it is recommended that this be reduced by nine dwelling units. Mr. Jerry Brown, representing Turnbury Home Owners Association, remarked that people In this subdivision will egress and ingress via Livingston Road upon its completion. He Indicated that these people are presently using Lakeland Avenue. He reported that upon completion of Turnbury, all requirements for full drainage and retention areas were met, noting that none of the water created within this area flows into Willoughby Acres. He explained that beautiftcatton Is beneficial and appealing whenever it occurs but the extent of the benefit to any area to be improved is the key question. He reported that when Turnbury was built, beautification was paid for and built into the plan, noting that the streets are wider than those of Willoughby and they run into cul-de-sacs. He stated that Turnbury is not receiving the direct benefits of this project that those homeowners in Willoughby receive. With regard to safety, he acknowledged that there is no doubt that when the culverts are covered and bike paths are installed, this will be a safer place to ride, but Turnbury residents will not be participating in this to the extent that the residents of Willoughby are participating In it and therefore some adjustment is necessary to the 44 homeowners that will be living in Turnbury rela- tive to the limited benefits that they will be receiving. Colissioner Saunders Indicated that Mr. Brown has presented a rather persuasive argument regarding the Turnbury assessment and qalestioned whether Mr. Archibald believes this should be reduced. Mr. Archibald replied that the purpose of today's hearing Is to weigh 000 ,, 15'Page 8 thoae major benefits and recognize that there are other benefits to be derived. He disclosed that the most important benefit to be recognized relates to aesthetics and safety on Euclid and Lakeland. He explained that staff feels that based upon the overwhelming empha- sis placed upon aesthetics and safety, no changes have been recom- mended for Turnbury since they may have access to Livingston Road in the future, but they currently do not have legal access to that road. He reported that that project was developed with access by taking advantage of the roads in Willoughby Acres, and those roadways will most likely continue to be their primary direction of access In the future. In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Archibald advised that Livingston Road is approximately 600 feet away from the district boun- dary that has been established by staff. He pointed out that there Is one parcel in the northeast corner in the vicinity of the "S" curve for Livingston Road that is recognized as benefiting from Livingston Road arid is included in the Livingston Road Assessment District, but the Turnbury property is not. Mr.. Brown stated that when the improvements are made to Euclid and Lake/and Avenues, the properties on those two streets will increase in value by $5,000 - $10,000, but the properties in Turnbury will incur no increase in property valuations as a result of this project. Mr. Archibald expressed that Turnbury has been designed so that it could be connected to Livingston Road if the County acquires certain properties, but this area will not be assessed for improvements to Livingston or any of the other arterial road improvements. , Mr. Roger Wiedeback advised that he represents Vincent and Nicholas LaGrasta and Louis Rappaport, owners of a 5 acre parcel and an additional 2.5 acres, located 600 - 700 feet from any area to be ~mproved. He noted that his clients have the same access problem as reported in earlier comments made by Mr. Murphy. He indicated that the assessment should be limited to those who will benefit from ~ame, noting that his clients' property value will not be improved. March 19, 1991 He questioned whether at some future time, it is possible for this 7.5 acres to be developed, if zoning would require the same identical improvements and If so, these people would be assessed twice. Mr. Archibald disclosed that the two parcels in question are encumbered by wetlands and staff Is recommending a reduction from 12 units to i unit with the idea that it may be possible to place 1 unit in one of the corners. Mr. Kaztmier Dabrowskt voiced his objection to the assessment on the basis that his 5 acre parcel is north of Section 24, bordering Section 13. In addition, he divulged that there is no access to his parcel, and noted that in all likelihood, there will be no access to same for the next 20 years. Mr. Archibald reported that the subject parcel is currently being assessed for 12 units and staff Is recommending that this be reduced to ! unit. He indicated that if access can be provided via Livingston Road, this parcel may need to be Incorporated into the Livingston Road assessment. Mr. Richard Vetter, announced that he is the developer of Ktrtland Pines which is a subdivision south of Turnbury. He Indicated that part of the design criteria for his project is a 75' wide right- of-way, allowing for drainage which would not impact the Willoughby area drainage system. In addition, he advised that there is a water retention area to the rear of each lot, and suggested that Klrtland Pines not be required to pay the burden of the development for the culverts for the swales on Lakeland Avenue. He noted that the people benefiting from these improvements would be the property owners adja- cent to those swales and if there is a safety factor, the Commission should step up and carry the burden of same. Mr. Archibald explained that the legal access to Kirtland Pines is via Lakeland Avenue and at some future point in time, access may be possible through Livingston Road. He revealed that this subdivision will continue to be assessed at the 16 units that have been developed. Mr. Bill Barton spoke to the assessment with regard to the 17 Page 10 March 19, 1991 Willoughby Gardens PUD which represents 14.61 acres. He noted that this is an unimproved parcel which fronts on Immokalee Road, and is being assessed at 90 dwelling units since this is the allowable number of tinits in the PUD. He divulged that he concurs that the situation in this area does present a safety hazard, difficult maintenance problems, poor aesthetic design and he is in favor of moving forward with the Improvements. He pointed out that the subject PUD is required to incorporate an on-site storm water management system that will retain and manage the water on site so that post development runoff cannot exceed the predevelopment runoff. He suggested that this project share at a rate equal to development of the property as though It were to be developed as single family. Mr. Barton displayed a plat map of Willoughby Acres depicting Willoughby in its current platted format with his project penciled in as a single family format with 42 units, equal to what is presently in Willoughby Acres. He pointed out that if roadside ditches in Willoughby are hazardous, his project would utilize approximately 250 LF of Euclid as an entry road. He suggested that Willoughby Gardens be assessed at 42 dwelling units. Mr. Archibald reported that Mr. Barton's comments are appropriate since this project should be looked at from the basis of equivalent dwelling units rather than the designation. He stated that he believes that a reduction of approximately 45 dwelling units would be appropriate. He concurred with Mr. Barton's analysis based upon a subdivision of that property in similar lot sizes adjacent to his development. Commissioner Volpe voiced his concern that if Mr. Barton's premise is accepted, it seems that some type of adjustment should be con- sidered for Turnbury and Ktrtland Pines. Mr. Archibald replied that Staff recognizes that there are drainage related concerns and improve- ments, but this Issue is very small compared to the improvements to be derived from an aesthetic and safety standpoint. He remarked that a March 19, 1991 case may be made for all the properties with frontage along Euclid and Lakeland Avenues. He noted that staff is attempting to address everything from an equivalent dwelling unit basis. Mr. Archibald advised that this project was originally estimated at $990,000 with 1,216 dwelling units at about $740 per unit. He related that a total reduction of 189 - 191 units would bring the total assessable units down to 1,027 which would Increase the assessment to $878 per dwelling unit. He reported that if the construction phase was to begin with those kinds of dollars, he would recommend to the Commission that this not be done until all the resi- dents have been notified of the change in assessment. Mr. Archibald requested that the Commission consider the resolu- tion and assessment roll as presented in the agenda packet, realizing that this is a tentative assessment roll and that staff is in a fairly good accord with all the speakers that have some objection and that the real intent is to keep the assessment at about $740 per unit. He indicated that this would result in reducing the construction costs by $141,340 and he believes that this is possible. Commissioner Shanahah stated that he feels that the Commission should move forward with the adoption of the resolution and the ten- tative assessment roll with the view in mind that staff will attempt to reduce the construction costs in order to keep the assessment at $?40 per unit. There were no other speakers. C~se~r Shanahah moved, seconded b~ Co~aissioner Saunders end cmx~l~u~mn~ly, to close the ~bl~c he~n~. C~~o~r S~ moved, seconded b~ Co~ssloner Sm~der~ ~d c~r~~l~ly, t~ Reeolutlon 91-254 ~ adopted, tha~ the ten- · at~ ~~nt roll ~ appr~ed, wl~h ~he ~derst~dtng t~t If the f~l ~=lal re~lt te not w~th~n the mlnl~ ch~ge~ t~t ~other ~b~o ~lng w~11 ~ conducted; that r~ ~n t~ ~eee~en~ d~strlct, ~d that the e~lvalen~ ~111ng ~t ~l ~ly, ~ reco~d~ ~ Tr~s~rtmtion March 19, 1991 CHAIIMAN TO WRITK LETTERS KXPRKSSING OPPOSITION RE LEGISLATIVE BILLS KESTR!CT~BI3 THX POWER OF COUNTIKS TO REGULATE BILLBOARDS Commissioner Goodnight stated that she Just received a note from the Florida Association of Counties, recommending the opposition to Legislative Bills which will take away the powers of local governments to have sign ordinances and regulate billboards. She noted that if these Bills are adopted, they will provide for Jury trials for compen- sation in eminent domain cases Involving billboards. Commissioner Hasse advised that he does not want to see any of Collier County's regulatory powers taken away with regard to billboards, and noted that he ts very pleased with the existing ordi- nances which do not allow these in all sections of the County. Commissioner Goodnight requested the authority as Chairman to write a letter to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House voicing Collier County's strong opposition to Senate Bill 1510 and House Bill 1569. Ch0am~ootoner Saunders ~bOV~rd, seconded by Conicsloner Haose and c~toriedunaniml¥, that the Chairman write the appropriate letters expressing opposition to the Legislative Bills restricting the power of Counties to regulate billboards. 84 Page 13 Hatch 19, 1991 .so Recess: 10:50 A.M. - Reconvened: ll:00 A.M. at which time D~puty Clerk /)uevtn replaced Deputy Clerk Hoffnan *** !tg.SOL~fXOI~ 91-257~ PETITION CCSL-90-11, CLYDE C. QUINB¥, TRUSTEE, I~qUI~fZNQ A CO~TAL CONSTRUCTION SETBACK LINE VARIANCE FOR THE COlI~fl~D~'fXON OF AN ~LEVATRD DUNE WALKOVeR STRUCTURE FOR TH~ WATERRARE CONDOW~I~UN TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TIT~ BEACH THROUGH AN ~lfT ON TR~ $~A#ATCH CONDONINXUN ASSOCIATION, INC., PROPERTY - ~.DOFTIiDW~TR $TZPUL&TXONS Legal notice having been published In the Naples Daily News on February 24, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition CCSL-90-11, flied by Clyde C. Qutnby, Trustee, requesting a coastal construction setback line variance for the construction of an elevated dune walkover structure on the Seawatch Condominium Association, Inc., pro- perty in Vanderbilt Beach Estates. Ktm Polen, Project Review Services, presented Petition CCSL-90-11, a request by the Watermark Condominium for permission to construct an elevated dune walkover structure to provide pedestrian access to the beach through an easement on the Seawatch Condominium Association, Inc., property. She said the petitioner requires a 117 foot variance seaward of the coastal construction setback line in order to construction the dune walkover structure. She noted the petition is consistent with the applicable policies of the coastal element of the Growth Management Plan, therefore, Staff recommends approval of Petition CCSL-90-11 subject to the stipulations listed in the Executive Summary. Co~tutoner Shanahah aoved, seconded by Countseisner Saunders and carrledwrianinousl¥, to close the public hearing. Co~lgelon~r Shanahah ~oved0 secondod by Comaissioner Hasge and carrt~dl~an~l¥, that Petition CCSL-90-11 be approved subject to Steff'o otipulation~, thereby adopting Resolution 91-257. Page 14 March 19, 1991 Iq~OLIFTION 91-256 1~ P~TZTZON SNR-91-1, LAURA R, RYAN OF WILSON, MILL[3~o BIkRTON & PEEK, ~NC., P, XPRESENTING LELY DRV~LOPM~NT CORPORATION Iq~(~Fr. STING& STRKKT NAM~ CHANGE FROM PINNACLE BOULEVARD TO CELESTE DRIVEt LOCATED IN LELY, A RESORT COMMUNITYt PHASE ONE - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on February 24, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition SNR-91-1, by filed Laura R. Ryan of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., repre- senting Lely Development Corporation requesting a street name change from Pinnacle Boulevard to Celeste Drive, located in Lely, A Resort Community, Phase One, South of Grand Lely Drive, West of C.R. 951 In Section 27 and 34, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. Planner Mulhere explained that Petition SNR-91-1 and the following Petition SNR-91-2 are both requests for street name changes and asked that they be heard at the same time. He noted Petition SNR-91-1 requests a street name change from Pinnacle Boulevard to Celeste Drive, and Petition SNR-91-2 is requesting a name change from Cherry Lane to Tiger Island Boulevard. He advised in both cases, the streets are completely internal to Lely, A Resort Community development, and all the property contiguous to the streets Is under the ownership of the developer. ~sstoner Shanaban ~oved, seconded by Co---tsstoner Huse and c~r~ted~ly, to close the public hearing. C~utsstoner $hanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and ¢~l~d~ly, that Petition $NR-91-1 be approved, thereby ~ kiltIon 91-256. Page 15 March 19, 199! ~I~ON 91-255 R~ PETITION S~-91-2, ~ R. RY~ OF H/LSOR, ~, ~N · ~, INC., ~S~ING LgLY D~LO~ C~TZ~, ~Q~STING A S~T N~ C~Gg ~OM C~Y ~ TO TIGER IS~ ~~ ~N LELY RESORT P~$2 O~ - A~ED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on February 24, ~99~, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition SNR-91-2, filed by Laura R. Ryan of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., repre- sen~ing Lely Development Corporation, requesting a street name change from Cherry Lane to Tiger Island Boulevard in Lely Resort Phase One, soukh of Grand Lely Drive and west of C.R. 951. D~scuss~on of this item was heard wl~h the previous petition. ~~~ S~~ ~, second~ ~ Co~lssioner H~se ~d ~~ ~~~, to close the ~bl~c he~ng. ~~r S~ ~, second~ ~ Co~ss~one~ ~se ~d ~~ ~~ly, t~t Petition S~-91-2 ~ a~r~ed, there~ Page 16 March 19, 1991 I~T~T~ONV-91-1, I~LT~R PZT~RS0N, I~PI~S~flNG SHZLL ISL~ CONDOMINIUM, l~'f~N~ & 14 FOOT VItRI~C~ FROM TH~ ~QUI~D 20 FOOT F~ONT Y~I~D ~ TO 6 ~ FOR COV~I~D PARI~ING ON PROPERTY LOC&T~D &T 898-902 COURT - D~NIZD Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on February 24, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-91-1, filed by Walter Peterson, representing Shell Island Condominium, requesting a 14 foot variance from the required 20 foot front yard setback to six feet for covered parking at Shell Isle Condominium. Planner Arnold noted that the following request, Petition V-90-19, is for an adjacent piece of property and asked that both items be heard together, which will provide a better understanding of what is being requested. He stated Petition V-91-1 is a request from the Shell Isle Condominium Association to cover their 18 parking spaces for three condominium units. He said Petition V-90-19 requests that they be allowed to cover six parking spaces for one four-unit con- dominium. He added both properties are located on the southern por- tion of Marco Island on Panama Court. He advised Petition V-91-1 is requesting a 14-foot variance from the required 20-foot setback to six feet for covered parking, and the adjacent property owner is seeking a 10-foot variance to ten feet, also for covered parking. He reported Staff has reviewed the requests in accordance with the guidelines for determining whether or not a variance should be granted and found no hardships involved with the land to warrant the construction of covered parking. He noted, however, the CCPC has recommended approval with the addition of a stipulation to plant landscaping along the Panama Court frontage and along the sides to buffer them from the street. Commissioner Hasse questioned if these requests are the first for covered parking spaces on Panama Court? Planner Arnold Indicated that is correct. He added, however, that after visiting the site it appears that a portion of the parking spaces on both properties can be 000 95 Page 17 March 19, 1991 covered without the necessity of a variance. George Keller, President of the Collier County Civic Federation, commented that variances are allowed to take care of hardships and the purpose of setback requirements is to make properties aesthetically pleasing to the neighborhood. Commissioner Hasse communicated he finds it difficult to grant variances of this nature when they have no use to the neighborhood and do not rectify any problems within the neighborhood. Commissioner Shanahah mentioned that there is no correspondence in favor of the requests, while there are six letters in opposition. Planl%er Mulhere agreed, stating most of the concerns are for the aesthetics of the neighborhood. Co~m~i~etoner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Haeee and ~~l~r ~dmrm ~, mecond~ ~ Coutsstoner Huse ~d ~~-~~1~ to deny Petition V-91-~. ~ITI~ V-9~19, ~~ D~K, ~QUESTING A l0 FOOT V~I~CE ~OM ~ ~~ ~O~ T~ ~~ OF 20 ~ET TO l0 ~ET FOR C0~D P~ING ON ~~ L~A~ AT 904 P~ CO~T~ ~CO IS~ - D~IED Legal not~ce having been published in the Naples Daily News on February 24, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-90-~9, Ke~eth Dale, requesting a 10 foot variance fro the required front ~ard setback of 20 feet to 10 feet for covered ~arking o11 property located at 904 Panama Court, Marco Island, kno~ as T~ki House Condominium. Discuss/on of this item was heard with the previous petition. ~t~r S~dere ~, seconded ~ Co~t88toner Hues ~d ~~ ~~1~, to close the ~bllc hearing. ~~r Sanders ~v~, seconded ~ Co~lee~oner H~ee ~d ~~-~~ly, to deny Petition V-90-~9. ~~ 93-25B ~ ~ITION ~-90-1, ~LLI~ C. MC~Y OF ~LLI~ C. ~T ~ ~IA~S, P.A., ~S~ING COLLEGE ~O~IES OF S~ ~DA, INC., ~Q~STING ~OVISION~ USE 'b~ OF ~ A-2 P&~ 18 ~arch 19, 1991 ZOII]HI DXSTRXCT TO ALLOW AN KARTH MINING OPKRATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED 3.8 MILES KAST OF C.R. 951 AND NORTH OF SABLK PALM ROAD - ADOFTED SUBJECT TO PETITIONERtS AGREEMENT SHEET Planner Bellows explained Petition PU-90-1 is a request for Provisional Use "b" of the A-2 Zoning District to allow for an expan- sion of an existing earth mining operation. He said the subject site is located on the northwest corner of Sanders Boulevard and Sabal Palm Road. He noted the surrounding land uses include vacant, undeveloped A-2 zoned property and the nearest residence is approximately two miles to the west on Sabal Palm Road. He reported the petition was submitted as a result of a violation of Collier County's excavation ordinance, when the hired excavator went beyond the previously approved limit. The violation was discovered approximately two years ago, he said, at which time the County shut down the excavation opera- tion. He advised after extensive discussions with the petitioner, Staff determined the best way to rectify the situation would be to require the petitioner to deed ten acres in the Fakahatchee area to the State as a preservation area. He stated the proposal will have no adverse effects on surrounding properties and is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. He concluded that Staff, along with the CCPC by a vote of 6/1, recommends approval of Petition PU-90-1, subject to the Petitioner's Agreement Sheet. Gommissioner Hasse questioned how many acres were excavated for which they were not given permission? Planner Bellows replied that twenty acres were excavated by a hired corporation which has since left the area, leaving the owner of the property in the current situation. He added the petitioner has been very cooperative in trying to come up with a mitigation plan. Tom Hart, representing the petitioner, explained that College Properties of Southwest Florida, Inc., is an investment arm of Oberlin College in Ohio. He stated after purchase of the subject property in 1985, the owner was approached by A1 Johnson of Sea Con Industries with the concept that Mr. Johnson would obtain permits and operate a mining and excavating operation on 40 acres of land. He said the 0130 , 97 Page 19 ~arch 19, 1991 operation was conducted properly for approximately one year, however, when a Trustee from Oberlin College visited the site in 1989, he discovered that Mr. Johnson had gone well beyond the 40 acres with his excavation activities. He said the Trustee notified him, and he imme- diately terminated the contract with Mr. Johnson, contacted the County and explained the problem, asking what would need to be done to rec- tify the situation. He indicated the outcome of negotiations is the petition before the Board this date. Commissioner Volpe commented he is not convinced there is a need for additional fill materials in Collier County. Commissioner Hasse mentioned that the Board is constantly receiving complaints from people in the Sabal Palm Road area regarding the tremendous amount of traffic and the destruction of roads because of the heav~ trucks traveling in that area. Planner Bellows indicated the Transportation Department feels there will be no additional impact from the original Provisional Use granted for this property. Commissioner Volpe asked, from an engineering perspective, what is the reason behind the request for expansion of the Provisional Use? Shawn Abernathy, an engineer with William C. McAnley and Associates, explained that after discussion with Pro3ect Review Services, it was deemed most feasible from all aspects to expand the operation as opposed to trying to re-fill the property. Planner Bellows agreed, adding the quality of fill taken from the original site would not be suitable for revegetation, and it would be very difficult to repair the site adequately. He said the most logi- cal idea is to expand the Provisional Use and require the off-site slttgatton. Commissioner Volpe asked if there has been an assessment made regarding whether Collier County needs additional excavation sites? Planner Bellows Indicated there has been no assessment that he ts aware of. He said Staff's recommendation for approval of this peti- tion is based on market studies and the general developmental trends 98 Page 20 March 19, 19g! of the County. C4~t~lone~ S~unde~s ~v~d, ~econded by Co~metone~ B~e ~d ~~ 4/1 (C~io~r Vol~ ~~), to a~r~ Petition ~-90-1, ~J~ te ~ ~titio~r's A~nt Sh~t, there~ a~p~ing ~ 000,~,,~ 99 Page 21 March 19, 1991 ~:[::~:~FTIiON 91-2~9 R~ FETTTION PU-90-22, RICHARD L. HOU~ON ~Q~STIRG ~ 0~ ~SIOH~ USK 'b' IN ~ A-1 ZONING DIS~I~ T0 OBTAIN ~~ ~ ~R ~ ~ISTING ~IN~ C~ - ~~ ~~ TO Planner Mulhere explained Petition PU-90-22 is a request for a Provisional Use for an existing hunting camp. He said the petition is for a 320 square foot addition which was built in 1989 to the existing structure, and is the first step toward obtaining building permits. He advised the additional structure will primarily be used for storage, but may also be used occasionally for sleeping during excur- sions by the petitioner or his Guests. He mentioned the petitioner is an exempt property owner of a parcel which Is approximately 115,000 square feet in size in the Big Cypress Preserve. He said Staff does not object to the granting of this petition subject to the stipula- tions listed on the Agreement Sheet. He noted the executive summary indicates there was a discrepancy between the owner and the Park Service relating to the classification of his exemption, which has been resolved subsequent to the CCPC hearing this petition. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Richard Houghton replied that the original cabin was built in 1960 and is approximately 16' by 40' He said the property is 14 miles from the nearest road of any descrip- tion other than the Exxon otl well road which is not open to the public, and is I 1/2 miles from his property. He stated access to the property is achieved by coming through the woods in a swamp buggy or 21 miles by air boat to another exempt property owner's cabin, then three miles back to his property by swamp buggy. Planner Mulhere stated the CCPC unanimously recommended approval of the petition. He added that the Agreement Sheet contains mitiga- tion requested by the County's environmental staff, which requires the petitioner to plant trees on site for those that may have been removed when the addition was constructed. ~ton~r Saunders ~v~d, seconded by Co~tsstor~r SI~ ~nd ~t~'~ed~ly0 to approve Petition PU-90-22 ~ubJect to the P~tttt~rse Affreemnt Sheet, thereby adopting Resolution 91-259. 000 ,,-,d09 Page 22 ~arch 19, 1991 X~ ~& -. ]KXT~K~:~N OF BUILDING PERNIT APPROVED ~R ~I~ ~CO ~ ~io~r S~ders ~, second~ ~ Coulssioner S~~ ~d ~~ ~~ly, to ~r~ ~ ~xte~on of the ~ld~ng /~. ~ ~t ~co ~. (See Item ~~ 0F ~Z~ZNG P~ZT ~O~D ~R ~ P~ZN~ ~l~ ~~ly, to a~r~e ~ extension of the ~ildtng ~i~ for ~ ~1~. NOT~: Later in the meeting, Items ~8A and ~SB ~ere addressed for clarification as follows: ~i~t~r S~ders ~ed, seconded ~ Co~tsetoner S~ ~d c~l~ ~l~ly, t~t the ~tldtn~ ~its for Point ~rco k ~a will ~ e~ended for a ~rtod of six ~nt~ with the ~~lW to ~cel~ ~ thr~nth extensions. ess ~s~: 11:55 A.N. - R~onven~: 12:35 P.N. at ~tch tie ~W Clerk ~rt~t replaced NpuW Clerk lt~ .~12D ~ ~ ~ A LE~ TO ~~ O~ LEGZS~TZ~ DELEGATXON ~ O~XTXON ~ H.B. 226~ ~ S.B. Z522, ~XCH ~Z~Z~ ~ ~XTXO~ 0W LOG~ GO~*S USE O~ X~A~ Co~tssloner Goodnight explained H.B. 2251 is to be heard before the House of Community Affairs which if implemented will limit local gover~ents' ability to use impact fees. She requested the Board's approval to ~ite to the State Delegation and the Chairman of the Co~ity Affairs Committee, Fred Jones, s~ating Collier County's opposition to this bill. ~~r ~se ~ed, seconded ~ Co~issioner S~ ~d ~ ~l~t~ ~W's ~s~t~ to ~.B. 22~1 ~d S.B. ~522. Page 23 March 19, ~991 TIPPING I~'E$ FOR CLEAN-UP DAY FOR PLANTATION ISLAND - ~ssioner Shanahah ~oved, seconded by ComAsstoner Hasse and c~l~ ~~ly, to ~tve the tipping fees for cle~-up ~y for ~ D~~ ~ S~IT ~ATE MODIFICATION IN RES~NSE TO ~ ~~ OF ~RO~~ ~G~TION~S I~PE~ION REPORT ~G~DING ~~ OF ~G~ATION ON TIG~TAIL B~ Assistant to the County Manager Olliff stated that staff is requesting direction for negotiations to obtain a DER permit for the removal of the remaining vegetation on Tigertall Beach. He explained a portion of the beach area that the County had requested to be cleared lies within the Jurisdiction of the DER, and a request for a permit for said clearing was submitted to DER. He reported that the area in question is partly along the shore line as well as on the north side of the beach area. He related that DER's response was that all of the proposed areas remain preserved and a conservation easement Granted. Mr. Olltff recommended that a counter offer be submitted from the County to DER suggesting that all the vegetation be removed from the shoreline and the entire area in question landward of the dune line be preserved. Commissioners Shanahah and Hasse expressed their support for staff~s recommendation. Harry Huber from the Office of Capital Projects Management clarified the proposal from DER Is to preserve the specified area except to provide walkways of 15 feet in width at 100 foot intervals, and the proposal by the county is to provide the specified area behind the dune line as a conservation area and clear the beach area comple- tely. Joseph Baronzzl from Marco Island pointed out that two-thirds of the area that DER is claiming as their land has already been cleared by permit by the pipeline people when they removed the pipeline. In Page 2 4 March 19, 1991 reference to DER's request for a conservation easement, Mr. Baronzzt noted that there is a condition in the deed which states that if the area in question is no longer used as a public park it reverts to the Collier Corporation which prohibits a grant such as this from even being considered. He added that many of the people from Marco Island have put all their confidence in the Board of County Commissioners.to continue to preserve and clear Tigertall Beach. George Keller, President of Collier County Civic Federation, voiced his support in clearing the beach completely. Charlotte Westman, League of Women Voters of Collier County, stated that it is important to note that Tigertall Beach is a public County beach. Cee~a~ion~r Shanahan ~oved, seconded by Cow-tsstonar Rases and ~Tled~m~ni~msly, to accept staff's alternative ~odtficatton and ~ ~prs~'~d with negotiations with DER on that buis, completely Commissioner Shanaban suggested that staff include In their alter- native modification to the DER the reversion clause found in the deed. County Nanager Dorrtll concurred. Commissioner Goodnight reported that a policy Is being drafted through the County Manager's office In regards to raking the beaches. Page 25 March 19, 1991 C0e~I/$$IONglt $&UlfDERS APPOINTED TO DISCUSS SETTL~NT 0PTZON~ ~ C~'S ~L~TZC~ CO~Z~E~ INC. ~ 3~S K. ~SSLER In accordance with the motion made on March 12, 1991, for the Chagrin to appoint a commissioner to discuss settlement options w~th representatives of The Cltizen's Political Committee, Co~isstone~ ~oo~ght appointed Co~ssione~ Saunders. Commissione~ Goodnight e~lmined ~hat Co~issione~ Saunders is authorized to discuss the pro- posed settlement as a representative of the Board of County Co~tssione~s and speak fo~ them; however, if any debatable issues a~Jse they a~e to be b~ouGht back before the full Board fo~ discussion as is ~y settlement agreement. She advised that Commissione~ Sa~de~s should use his discretion as to whethe~ legal counsel should be p~esent. Co~tsslone~ Saunders accepted the appointment and stated that he w~11 ~la~tfy to The Clttzen's Political Committee and ~ts council that he is a messengem from the Board; and 1f any document is developed as a ~es~l~ of the discussions, it ls to be bmouGht back to the Board. ~e added that these d~scusstons w~11 p~ov]de an oppo~tuntty fo~ a settlement without costly, legal litigation. He informed that a meeting will be a~anGed with The Ctttzen's Political Committee and its co~c~l 1~edlately and suggested that this ~tem be placed on the Board of County Co~isstone~s' agenda fo~ Ma~ch 26, 1991 to p~ovlde an update. Gouty Attorney Cuyler confirmed that until h~s office hears that there ~s a settlement agreement agreed upon by the Board, he w~11 proceed w~th the legal action. ~ ~T~ CO~IONS S~T~GIC D~LO~ P~ - ACCORD ~ Asstst~ to the County ~anager Pike noted that the ~nteg~attve Co~ectton~ St~ategAc Development Plan has been provided to the Co~t~stoners and ~or the reco~d. As a matte~ o~ bacAg~ound, Hs. Pike Page 2 6 March 19, 1991 informed that in accordance to the Florida Statutes the Collier County Correctional Planning Committee was established; and on June 6, 1989 the Board gave their approval for the committee to prepare an RFP for a consultant to develop a long range strategic plan for the County's criminal ]ustice system. She added that the Correctional Services Group, Inc. was the consultant firm selected for this action. She advised that this firm has over the past several months interviewed the County staff, leaders of the community, and held an advertised public hearing to accept public input to the plan. She recommended that the Board conceptually approve the Plan and provide staff direc- tion for its implementation. Bob Buchanan, President of Correctional Services Group, Inc., advised that the plan was developed by looking at the needs of the correctional system, determining what is currently available to address those needs, and making recommendations as to how to address the defi- cits in the system. He explained that the three components to the study are the operating efficiency of the criminal Justice system, the alternatives to incarceration, and the facilities requirements. Alan Beck of Correctional Services Group, Inc. summarized that his presentation will be on the analysis of the criminal justice system, looking at the alternatives available to reduce the jail population as well as making a forecast. He pointed out that in creating a plan such as this it is important to understand what the jail population consists of which astonishingly has many people who are not sentenced, 44~; therefore, one alternative available to lessen the Jail popula- tion is to shorten the amount of time an unsentenced person stays. He noted that approximately 20% of a 3ail's population is involved with a violent offense, but the majority is involved with substance abuse which can contribute to fights and traffic violations. In Mr. Beck's presentation he made several recommendations with the first being to hire a resource person who can operate the computer available to its fullest capability and develop the management reports necessary which can result in reducing the unsentenced population. Page 27 Hatch 19, 1991 He reported that the second recommendation is to improve the case load computer monitoring system, and the improvements have been specifi- cally identified in the report. The third recommendation, he advised, is to develop a strategy to collect and analyze noncomputerized data related to criminal justice problems, and the fourth recommendation is to develop time goals for the various Justice system events. Recommendation five, he stated, is to create a policy on continuances with specific operational improvements targeted. He noted that recom- mendation six is to monitor and evaluate the charging process, recom- mendation seven states that violation of probation cases should be expedited, and recommendation eight provides that the process of pre- sentence investigation report preparation should be expedited. He explained that recommendation nine suggests that computer resources for case management in the offices of the Sheriff, State Attorney, Clerk of of Court, Public Defender and County Probation should be eva- luated for compatibility. Mr. Beck informed that in order to forecast for correctional faci- lities, trends must be reviewed as well as the speculation of the growth of the County's population. He indicated that it appears that with the growth rate of the County, there will also be some increase in the Jail population amounting to three beds per 1000 population. Mr. Beck explained that in forecasting for jail population there are three levels, the high level is based on a rapid growth with no changes in the system, the planning level is in the middle with no improvements, and the low level indicates that there is a great impro- vement in the system. In response to Commissioner Shanahah, Mr. Beck confirmed that by . improving the efficiency in the system, there could be a 25~ savings. In conclusion of his presentation, Mr. Beck addressed the alter- natives of incarceration which include programming for both sentenced and pretrial people as well as electronic monitoring. He mentioned that other alternative recommendations to incarceration include a minimum security residential punishment center, Sheriff's Weekend Work Page 28 March 19, 1991 Programs implemented, Intensive Probation Supervision Project established, a Work Release Program implemented, a Jail Population Management Subcommittee of the Collier County Correctional Planning Go~ittee charged with the design and implementation of a monitoring tracking system for the Jail, the County should endorse and support full implementation of the Sherlff's pretrial services unit, and a Bail Review Subcommittee of the Collier County Correctional Planning Committee formed to incur early processing of the low bail cases and the maxim~tm use of bail alternatives. Mr. Buchanan informed that in reviewing the current Jail facility in Collier County, it appears to have merit for the future with limi- tations such as not enough required bed space for the future, not having the capability for direct supervision, and not having the proper support space as well as the location being too far from the housing pods. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Buchanan explained that the potential site locations were looked at in terms of the growth of the different areas of the County. He related that the recommendation to expand the existing County facility was because of the growth in the 'eastern part of the County and the location of the criminal courts. Mr. Beck informed that there are two major crime areas in the County which are East Naples and the Immokalee areas. Mr. Buchanan stated that the recommendation regarding facility needs is a two-phased construction timeframe providing for two addi- tions to the existing County facility. He explained that the concept of the planned facility is geared toward reducing staff and maximizing control. In costing out the two-phased construction, he advised that the additional program space will be at an expense of approximately $4 million and the new inmate housing and support space will cost approximately 013.8 million. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Buchanan affirmed that he will provide calculations for the cost of operations and maintenance for these two new additions. ooo , 122 Page 29 March 19, 1991 Mr. Buchanan reiterated that this is a very dynamic plan and added that it should be updated on an annual basis. Charlotte Westman, representing herself and the League of Women Voters of Collier County, provided for the record a letter from her- self, dated March 19, 1991, encouraging the approval of the recommen- dation of the Integratire Corrections Strategic Plan. Cm~a~to~r (kx~night moved, seconded by Co~aissioner Shanaban ~ ~A~ ~i~ly, to accept the lnt~ative Correc~io~ S~t~c PI~ ~d direct t~ Collier C~ Correcti~l Plying ~itt~ to fo~late a ~li~ to t~le~nt as ~tckly ~sstble the · h~ ~ic c~~ts ad~essed in the Ply, ~d provide rec~n- ~ti~ f~ alt~tive inc~ceratAon ~d faciliW r~ire~nts. Co~issioner Volpe suggested that correctional planning should be included into the County's Strategic Plan. Commissioner Goodnight a~eed. ~: 2:40 P.N. - R~n~: 2:50 P.N. at ~ich ~ ~ Clerk ~evin replac~ ~ Clerk ~ighi ~ ~ ~ DZLTONA C0~TZON I~OLVXNG DESZ~A~D ~OAVATION · ~,-' ~ ~~ TO ~ ~CAVATZON SX~S ~ S.R. 95X Transportation Services Administrator Archibald reported this item As an agreement with the Deltona Corporation resulting in gaining access to a commitment previously made by Deltona to provide an exca- vation site and access to that site for the S.R. 951 project. He said Staff has prepared an agreement which has been executed by the Deltona Corporation that provides for a lake excavation site within the Marco Shores project. He stated the lake location provides an easement to Collier County as well as access easements from S.R. 951. He indl- cared if approved, he will provide the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) with the information with the expectation that they will ~_ke use of the excavation material under either a contract which is pending, or for the surcharge contract for the southern Page 30 March 19, 199! portions of the S.R. 951 project. He noted another element in the agreement is a provision for Deltona to grant an easement at a loca- tion not yet established for access to the major north/south roadway which will be built by Deltona from U.S. 41 south to Marco Shores. Charlotte Westman, representing the League of Women Voters of Collier County, communicated her concern with a recent traffic problem on S.R. 9§1 and questioned if it will be the County's responsibility to excavate the lake and transport the materials to the rights-of-way along the S.R. 951 road-widening project? Mr. Archibald responded that currently, the ordinance requires Deltona to provide a site for the excavation and removal by a second party of up to one-half million cubic yards of material. He indicated the County is not responsible for the excavation or removal, however, does have a moral respon- sibility to ensure the agreements are in place so FDOT or its contrac- tor can take advantage of that site. He said if FDOT decides to obtain the material from another location, there is no requirement or obligation on the part of Collier County to excavate the lake. He added that the proposed agreement does not include a time constraint, therefore, the material may remain available to Collier County or the State for future projects on S.R. 951 or possibly for the Marco Island bridge. Mrs. Westman indicated her hope that a well thought out plan will be devised when the four-laning construction project begins in order to avoid creating a similar traffic situation to the gridlock that occurred during the previous week. Commissioner Shanahan communicated that the State recognizes a very significant responsibility for the maintenance of traffic on S.R. 9§! once the project gets under way. He advised that the problem occurred during the previous week because the contractor began work without a traffic plan and without any contact with FDOT. He stated, in his opinion, Collier County will have to work very closely with FDOT to devise a traffic plan for the very lengthy widening pro3ect pl~.~_ned for S.R. 9§1. He suggested that a plan needs to be created 124 Page 31 March 19, 1991 now to use S.R. 92 as an alternative route to take certain traffic, i.e., conerctal vehicles, heavy trucks, off S.R. 951 during that construction in order to avoid a traffic disaster. ~] ~1~, to m~ t~ a~~t ~ith the Nlt~ ~i~ ~lv~ ~t~tg ~tton sit~, Icc~s s~nts to ooo Page 32 March 19, 1991 ~OT~&T~D ~ FOR DESIGN, P~RMITTING, AND CONTRACTING SKRVXCES BY ~LSO~, MILL~lq, BARTON & PEEK, INC., RELATING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT OBLX~TI0~I ~TH TH~ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONM~NTAL REG~.ATION - ~ IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCK~D ~145~100 Transportation Services ~dministrator Archibald advised this item is a status report providing follow-up of Board direction to Staff on January 29, 1991, where Staff gained approval to select a consultant to do environmental plans for the permits involved with a consent order with the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER). He said a mitigation plan for six major road projects is also involved. He reported Staff has concluded negotiations with Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc. as the number one ranked firm and is asking that the Board of County Commissioners accept and approve the negotiated fees. He indicated a schedule to implement all provisions within the consent order is provided along with an outline of all of the activities and their appropriate costs. If approved, he said, a contract will be brought back to the Board as required. Commissioner Volpe questioned if Collier County has ever before given a consultant the authority to advertise and receive bids7 Mr. Archibald indicated he is not aware of any similar contracts, however, this is being done to meet some very strict time frames imposed by FDER. He noted the bid results will be brought back to the Board. Fred Tarrant objected to the idea of having an independent con- s~ltant prepare a bid that involves a substantial amount of money. He asked the Board to carefully consider allowing outside paid con- suitants to prepare the terms, conditions and the bidding process. Commissioner Saunders indicated that Mr. Tarrant's point is well taken, however, it is not an uncommon practice for the Board of County Commissioners to retain outside experts to prepare bid packages. He added that Staff will be evaluating every step in the process to ensure the results are in the best interests of the County. Transportation Services Administrator Archibald mentioned he shares the concern, stating that extra effort will be made to follow Page 33 March 19, 1991 the process very closely. ~~lo~er ~se ~r~d, seconded by Co~aissioner Volpe and ~t~ ~n~ntmly, to a~r~e the ne~ttat~ f~s for desto, ~r- ~tt~, ~ c~acttng ~tcem ~ ~11son, Miller, ~ton & P~k, ~.,-mlating to ~tromntal ~mit obligations with E~ in ~ ~., . m~ S145,100. SEE PAGES'~Z-- ~ Y? DI~ ~~ - O~ D~P ~L ~O~ ~ STA~ TO I~STIGA~ ~ ~~T~S ~R ~-~ Fred Bloetscher, Assistant Utilities Administrator, indicated the next two i~ems are inter-related and asked that they be discussed together. Paul Bowdoln with Boyle Engineering, stated he is the project manager for the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant project. He said Boyle Engineering was chosen to provide engineering services for the design of the new facility. He noted a concentrate disposal study was completed in February which Identifies five options for disposal of concentrate that will be generated at the plant: 1) dilute the concentrate for use as irrigation on golf courses, etc.; 2) dispose of the concentrate Into the sanitary sewer system and run it through the wastewater treatment plant; 3) discharge to the surface water; 4) direct land application; and 5) deep well injection. He reviewed pros and cons of the above options and concluded with a reconendatlon for the deep well Injection method. Contsstoner Saunders commented that regardless of whether the County utilizes a spray Irrigation system, deep well Injection will eventually be necessary because a back-up system is essential. Tom Mtsstmer of Mtsstmer & Associates agreed, adding that in the long-term, deep well injection is the most cost effective approach. He also mentioned that flexibility has been designed into the plant to allow conversion from membrane softening to reverse osmosis (r/o) as conditions may dictate in the future. ooo 142 Page 34 ~arch 19, 1991 Mr. Bowdoin communicated that deep well injection is a reliable and flexible method which is acceptable to the Department of Environmental Services. He said the time constraints involved can also be met by using that method. Commissioner Shanaban questioned why deep well injection is the most cost effective approach? Mr. Bowdotn responded that the cost for a 14-inch well i~ approximately $R.§-million. He said to construct a pipeline to the surface water discharge will cost in excess of $6-mlllton. He noted construction of a pipeline to the wastewater treatment plant which is approximately nine miles away, along with the storage tanks that would be required for blending the water with the concentrate will entail the expenditure of approximately $5-million. He also mentioned if the County chooses r/o in the future, that pipe- line will have to be abandoned. He concluded the other options are not technically viable. Commissioner Volpe asked if a mistake was made in choosing a membrane softening plant as opposed to r/o? Mr. Bowdotn replied in the negative, stating that a membrane softening plant will be less expensive to operate compared to a r/o plant. Mr. Missimer emphasized if an alternative means of disposing of the concentrate becomes available, a deep well can be utilized as a back-up system. Go~mtssioner Shanahah inquired if only one deep well should be considered at this time, and continue to work toward spray irrigation with aquifer storage and resource, etc., rather than spend $5-milllon on two wells? Mr. Mlssimer indicated that is the issue the Board needs to decide. He said one 14-inch well will bring the maximum disposal level up to 5-million Gallons per day and will provide the County with utilization of that site for a considerable number of years. He cautioned that the County should not give up the ability to utilize that water in some way. In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Missimer indicated as long as Collier County is developing an on-site back up plan, one deep well ooo !43' Page 3.5 March 19, 1991 will be sufficient. Commissioner Volpe questioned what the overall financial impact will be to utilize the deep well injection method? Mr. Bloetscher responded money was added in the past year's budget cycle for the water treatment plant. He said there is currently $15.§-million in the budget for construction. He noted it was anticipated there would be a need for some type of disposal for which there is approximately $1.§ million available. Commissioner Volpe indicated his concern that approximately $1-million may be necessary over and above what was originally budgeted for this project. C4eeea:J~sioner Saunders ~oved, seconded b~ Conissioner Shanaha- ~d ~ ~J~ ~t~ ~ Staff direct~ to lnv~ti~te other alter- ~ ~ ~ ~~ DIS~S~ Discussion of this item is contained in the previous item. Ceee~nioner Saunders moved, seconded b~ Co-ntsstoner Shanahah to Co~ss~oner Volpe ~nd~cated he has a problem with supplementing th~s contract with an additional $339,000. ~~11 for the ~estton, the ~tton carrl~ 4/1 (Co~tssloner Im~l I~ ~l--lIll ~ ~ ~2 OF O~ICE ~SHINGS AW~ TO O~IC~ Leo Ochs, Administrative Services Administrator, stated this is a recommendation to award the contract for purchase and installation of office furniture to Office Pavilion for a period of three years. He noted the previous contract with Office Furniture & Design, Inc., expired in November, 1990, and since that time a Staff committee has Page 36 .:.~ ~arch 19, 199! been working to solicit competitive pricing for this commodity and subsequently to determine the lowest responsive bidder. He indicated of the ten proposals received, Staff analysis has concluded that Office Pavilion offering Herman Miller Action Office Encore product is the lowest responsive bidder. He asserted their pricing represents approximately S9~ reduction over the prices paid under the previous contract. He advised that a bid protest has been received from Office Furniture and Design, Inc., and has been processed under the terms of the purchasing ordinance. He concluded Staff continues to recommend that Bid #91-1673 be awarded to Office Pavilion for a period of three years, subject to renewals for the fourth and fifth years, and that the Board waive variances to the proposal as outlined in Exhibit "C" of the Executive Summary. Steve Carnell, Purchasing Director, clarified the process used in making the selection. He said attempts were made to ensure that the County would be able to obtain office furnishings and in particular, modular furniture, that are acceptable in terms of qualitative and functional standards while at the same time gaining the most com- petitive pricing possible. In order to accomplish this, he said, the bidding process was broken into two steps. He reported bidders were asked to submit proposals in two envelopes, one containing information concerning the general product line they were offering and the service capability of each bidder, while the second envelope contained a detailed, itemized parts list based on specifications given to them on a typical County work station. He added discounts were also included, based on orders under and over $100,000, as well as an addi- tional discount for prompt payment. Commissioner Shanahah asked if Staff is satisfied that similar quality furniture is being compared? Mr. Camell responded the seven bidders who were considered ~n the price competition all submitted products that meet the County's minimum standards. Gommissioner Shanahah mentioned that Steelcase Furniture has a 10 year warrantee while Herman Miller products carry a 5 year warranty. ooo Ar, 145 Page 3'/ ~arch 19, 1991 He asked If that was taken into consideration when evaluating the pro- posals? County Manager Dotrill replied the benefit of a long-term warranty must be balanced with what the County wants to pay for the furniture. He calculated that $158,000 more would have been spent for the Clerk of Courts to move into the new Courthouse if the pre- existing furniture had been used. Clerk Giles indicated his concern with a five-year warranty due to the wear and tear associated with the type of work performed by his employees. He also mentioned that many of his offices now have Steelcase furniture and asked if Herman Miller products will be com- patible? An unidentified speaker said an arrangement may continue to pro- vide Steelcase furniture on a proprietary basis. Greg Miller, Sales Manager for Steelcase in South Florida, men- tioned that Collier County did a very in-depth study in 1988 to eva- luate six different manufacturers. Me said the evaluation, which included service, product and overall warranty, rated Steelcase Furniture as the number I vendor. '''!~T Clerk Hoffman replaced Deputy Clerk Guevin at this timesee Mr. Miller stated that the County has totally departed from what it had embarked on to be a very cost effective facility program. He noted that his company has had a seven year relationship with Collier County and has provided a very effective product. He related that there has been no cost to the County for warranty and at no time, has he been told that the service was less than expected. Me indicated that in six years in the industry, he has never seen variations allowed that were allowed in this bid. He requested that the Commission put forth the same quality effort that was put forth in 1988 and allow an evaluation of a mock-up. Mr. David Black, owner of Office Furniture & Design, spoke to the issue of discounts. Me stated that the list prices for the work sta- tions should be shown, calling attention to the Merman Miller price of over $9,000 and noting that his product is approximately $6,700 which Page 38 :' March 19, 1991 show~ the difference as to what the products may be. Mr. Black pointed out that 19" pedestals as opposed to 24" and 30" pedestals is quite a bit of difference and suggested that the Commission have an independent group evaluate a mock-up. He stated that his product has a steel pedestal and his competitor's pedestal consists of plastic, steel and wood which is totally different. Gommissioner Volpe questioned whether the products as submitted meet the specifications. County Manager Dotrill explained that the goal was to encourage competition and if the spec was written to allow only all steel pro- ducts, there is only one manufacturer that could have bid on same. He reported that as a result of opening up the spec and still having a minimum standard, three vendors submitted an interest in bidding but their products did not meet the required specifications and this was the reason for pre-gualtfying firms prior to opening the sealed bids. Mr. Carnell acknowledged that Office Furniture & Design has been an outstanding vendor to Collier County. He reported that the $25,000 Performance Bond figure is not included in Office Pavilion's bid, but Office Furniture & Design did include same, which is their prerogative and that is one more fee that the County would have to pay. He noted that Office Furniture & Design is suggesting that they fully complied with the absolute letter of the bid document, and the protest decision indicates that they did not. He explained that none of the bidders met every last literal specification that was asked for since there is a diversity in dimensional requirements and specifications in the fur- niture industry. Mr. Camell stated that two pricing scenarios were requested: prices for less than $100,000 orders; and prices for greater than $100,000 orders. He reported that Office Pavilion provided these pri- ces but Office Furniture & Design did not, but they broke their larger order categories into four discount schedules instead of two, thereby, making it very difficult for staff .to perform a correct analysis as to what their offer is. Page 39 March Mr. Mike Goulet, Herman Miller Regional Manager, called attention to the variance from the bid document and noted that he believes that his firm did follow the rules. He expressed that he welcomes the chance to go up against his competitor in a mock up process but noted that this has probably been completed several times over. He indi- cated that his product includes a five year warranty, guaranteed moving dates, onsite quality audits by an officer of the company, and a guaranteed minimum of 20% trade in value on Action Encore Office Products. He indicated that his warranty package is probably the most comprehensive production for any major end user in the industry. In answer to Gommissioner Volpe, Mr. Goulet stated that typically, if there is a price increase, it occurs on June /st. He reported that because of the present economy and market conditions, any increases this year would occur after the June 1st date. He Indicated that looking back over the past 3 years, price increases have averaged approximately 3~ - 4%. Commissioner Shanahah pointed out that "low bid, minimum stan- dards" have been applied to Herman Miller's bid. Mr. Goulet replied that he accepts the "low bid" tag, but noted that he does not accept the tag of "minimum standards". He advised that his product line stands on its own since it is the only product in the industry that has survived in excess of RO years. In addition, he remarked that any customer who purchased these products in 1968 or 1969 can buy products in 1991 and have these connect mechanically and interface with their original purchase. Mr. Jack Meyer, President, Herman Miller Office Pavilion, stated that staff has done an excellent job in putting this bid together and they gave everyone equal opportunity to come out and try to win Collier County's business. He indicated that his company is very ag~ressive, financially strong, and desires to do business with Collier County. There were no other speakers. ~u~ner Saunders ~oved, seconded by Com~ssioner Has~e and Pa~e 40 March 19, 1991 carri~d~i~o~sl¥, thit to accept the recommendation of Staff and ~ Bid ~'90-1673 to He~ Miller Office Pavilion on the ~ti~ly l.s ~t~ t~ the other pro.ors. I~:~10A ~ ~ ~ ~ CONING ~ US~ OF ~ I~EP~E~ ~ OF ~ ~ OR A ~ING O~I~ ~R ZONING ~ ~ USE ~~ - s/ s/ l Due ~o the lateness of the day, Co~lsstoner Goodnight suggested that this item be continued for one week. Co~issloner Saunders replied that in October, 1990, the Coalssion redested that the County Attorney's office present infor- mation regarding an Independent Board of Zoning Appeals, noting that the purpose of this item Is to provide another mechanism so that the Co~tssion meetings ~tll be more efficient. He stated that the longer this item Is put off, the more inefficient the meetings will continue to be. He voiced his ob~ection ~o continuing this item. ~tssi~r ~se ~, second~ ~ Cmisstoner S~ ~d ~i~ 4/1 (~issioner S~ders op~sed), to continue this Item to It~JIU Commissioner Goodnight suggested that this item be continued for one week due to the lateness of the day. Cc~utsmion~r Hume moved, seconded by Commissioner Shanah~n and c~rrt~d 4/1 (Commissioner Saunders opposed), to continue the dtm~ton on th~ Board's vacation schedule to 3/26/91. I~OLUTION~ 91-260/265 R~VOKING CERTIFICATES OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND ~~ ~ C~~S &I~ORT ~~RTATION S~IC~, INC.; ~l~ L~I~ S~C~, INC.; ROLLS ROYCE LIMOUSI~ S~ZC~, INC.; ~ OF ~8 LI~USI~, INC.; E~D ~SOLE D/B/A FIRST CLASS T~I S~; ~ ~ A. DE~SUS D/B/A T.D.J. T~I (RESPE~I~LY) - Co~aluto~r Shanahan ~oved, seconded by Co~mtsmioner Hawse and c~rriet mtso~sl¥, that Resolutions 91-260/265 r~voktng Certificates ooo 149 P~l~e 41 ~rvtce, Inc.; Collier Limousine Service, Inc.; Rolle Service, Inc.; Touch of Clue Limousine, Inc.; ld~rd Fi~t C1Me T~xt Service; ~nd Juan &. D~Je~u~ D/B/& (x~p~cttv~l¥), I~e adopted. Page 42 March 19, 1991 =~' ' IB~D~**~ 91-1!9 JL~0~ ~A~ ~ moved0 s~cond~d ~ C~t~mtoner S~ ~ ~t~ ~ly, t~t ~pt ~n~t 91-119 ~ adoptS. Its ~1~ ~ ~ 91-120/122 ~ 91-124 - ~D ~~t~r lus~ ~, seconded ~ Coatsstoner S~ ~d C~I~ ~ly, t~t ~d~t ~~t~ 91-120/122 ~ 91-124 ...' It~ ~ ~ ~ ~OL~ION 91-15 - ~~ Cka~m/eston~r !bmee ~ed, seconded by Co--tssloner $h~h~n ~nd c~rrtst ~tso~sl¥, that Budget &~endment Resolution 91-15 b~ Page 43 March 19, 1991 0Y D&FID T.,!kWRENCE CENTER, INC. CONTRACT FROH M&Y 1, 1990 - 1991 TO N&Y 1, 1990 - JULY 31, 1991, DUE TO EXTENSION OF ~iUI~IT&~,.RD~90-CJ-67-09-21-009 FRONAPRIL 30, 1991 70 JULY 31, 1991 - Lieutenant Byron Tomlinson of the Shertff's Office explained that this Item Is a companion item to Item #13B. He requested that the Commission approve extension dates with regard to Grant · 90-0J-67-09-21-009 from the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs, Bureau of Public Safety Management. He noted that a contract between the David Lawrence Center and the Sheriff's Office was approved on July 24, 1989 for the Grant period May 1, 1990 to April 30, 1991. He asked that an extension be granted from April 30, 1991 to J~ly 31, 1991. ~utoner $hmn~mn ~oved, secohie4 by Coutsstoner Huse and ~,mr~ted~l~o~sl¥, that the ~rmnt mension be approved, u ~ed by tlls $hertff's Office. 165 Page 44 March 19, 1991 ~/'!~1~I0~1 0% ~ GRMIT PERIOD FRO# JLPRTL 30, 1991 TO 3ULY 31, 1991 RE ~ ~ItMED ~90-C3-67-09-21-01-009 TREA~ CO!~PO~ - &PPltOVED Comm/sston~r VOll~ moved, seconded by Co--tsstoner Shanaban ~nd c~r~t~d~a~mtmousl¥, that the grant period be extended from &prtl 30, 1991 to 3lily 31, 1991 relative to ~90-C3-67-09-21-009. Page 45 March Comm/maloner $h~mJ~n moved, seconded by Commissioner $mund~rs ~nd ca.Tried unanimously, that the follo~ing item~ undmr the con~ent agencL~ be approved and/or adopted: Off ~i~'UIt~TY FOR ~XCAVATION PERNIT NO. 59.317 'BRIDGET { urrs- ~ {~{~IDM~Ff REQUEST ESTJ~BLISHIIIG A REM BUDGET IN THE IWPO FUND FOR & -- -~alv~ PLJLW CONSISTENCY GRJLWT FROWI THE FDOT P~2~T B~. 59.415 - 'LAKE LUCERNE AT ORANGETREE" BOUNDED BY RO~D TO TI~ ~ST AND ORANGETREE BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTH AND STIPULATIONS The excavation shall be limited to a bottom elevation of -4.0 ft. NGVD. All disturbed areas proposed for lake excavation shall be excavated to a minimum elevation of -4.0 ft. NGVD. Off-site removal of material shall be subject to "Standard Conditions" imposed by the Transportation Services in docu- mented dated 5/24/88. Where groundwater is proposed to be pumped during the exca- vating operation, a Dewatering Permit shall be obtained from the South Florida Water Management District, and a copy pro- vided to Project Review Services for approval prior to the commencement of any dewatering activity on the site. No blasting will be permitted unless issued a separate permit by Collier County Project Review Services. If trees are to be removed as a result of the excavating operation, a Tree Removal Permit, required by Ordinance No. 75-21 shall be obtained from Collier County Project Review Services before work shall commence. No Building Construction Permits will be issued for any proposed construction around the perimeter of any lake unless and until all lake side slopes adjacent to the proposed construction have been completed and approved by Collier County Compliance Services. All provisions of Collier County Ordinance No. 88-26 shall be adhered to. Copy of South Florida Water Management District construction/operation permit or early work permit shall be provided prior to excavation permit approval. No Excavation Permit shall be issued until all impact fees have been paid and construction plans have been approved. ~J~ OF S~CURZTY FOR ~XCAVATION P~RI~/T NO. 59.419e '{~UAIL Page 46 March 19, 1991 FINAL ~AT OF "FALLING WATERS" - WITH STIPULATIONS Accept the First Mortgage on real property as security to guarantee completion of the subdivision improvements. Authorize the recording of the Final Plat of "Falling Waters." Authorize the Chairman to execute the construction and main- tenance agreement. That no Certificates of Occupancy be granted until the requirement improvements have received preliminary accep- tance. Prior to construction of those improvements not within the area covered by the ACOE Nationwide Permit, the developer shall provide a copy of the ACOE General Permit and arrange another pre-construction meeting with County staff. If the required improvements cannot be constructed due to the lack of State of Federal permit issuance, construction plans shall be re-submitted with proposed alternatives, applicable temporary easement and applicable State and Federal permit modifications, to insure functional water management, utility and roadway systems. See Pages / 7f' / Item #16B1 SUBORDINATION OF UTILITY INTERESTS AGREEMENT BETWEEN FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CO. AND COLLIER COUNTY RE THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT HELD BY THE UTILITY ENCUMBERING THE LANDS BEING DONATED BY ASGROW SEED GO. ALONG IMMOKALEE ROAD BETWEEN 1-75 AND C.R. 951 SeePages Itel #16B2 FACILITIES RELOCATION AGREEMENT WITH FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. RELATING TO $.R. 95! WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING AUTHORIZATION TO EXl~END OOUNT~ FUNDS IN SUPPORT OF FINANCING PLAN ADOPTED BY FDOT FOR F~ 2990-92, CIE PROJECT NO. 012 TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO BCG Ite~ ,16CI BID ~1-1680 TO RE~OVATE RESTROOMS LOCATED AT IMMOKALEE AIRPORT PARK - ~ TO ~.J. CROSS CONSTRUCTION OF NAPLES, IN THE AMOUNT OF $29a885 Item ~ FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH HOLE, MONTES & A~SO~., IN~., FOR PUMP STATIONS 3.11 AND 3.14 - IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $174,700 Item#16D2 A~ FOR PROF~SSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH HOLE, MONTES & AS$OC.o INC. FOR M&STER PUMP STATIONS 1.03 AND 1.07 ALONG IMMOK&LEE ROAD - IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $175,700 See Pages B 17 M&rch 19, 1991 AGI~E~NENT FOR P~OF~SSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH WILSON, MILLER, BARTON AND PEEK, INC., FOR WATER UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS ALONG PALM DRIVE AND U.S. 41 - IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED_S96,000 See Pages 3/F- ~~"-- It~#16D4 ~ FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH WILSON, MILLER, AND PEEK, INC., FOR PUMP STATION 3.16 - IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EX~-~ED~75,5o0 SeePages It~#16D$ AGI~E~I~T FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING S~q~VICES WITH WILSON, MILLER, BA~TO~ AND PEEK, INC., FOR FORCE MAIN UTILITY PROJECT ON U.S. 41, SOUTH - IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $69,000 See Pages It~ ,16D6 AGRE~ME]IT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH WILSON, MILLER, BARTON ~ FEEE, INC., FOR PUMP STATION 3.18 LOCATED AT THE INT~S~J3TION OF U.S. 41 AND C.R. 951 - IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $69,500 See Pages ~F~ "~~ It~#lSE1 s'ra A WITH WAYNE ANS AU ION CO AN FOR oc- .mmv cgs Ite~.~ el~2 BID ~91-16TT FOR CONTRACT PRINTING - AW&RDED TO PRIDE OF FLORIDA, V~-PHT!IT AND DESIGNS OF N~ES, INC. It~ ~16G1 - C~t/nu~ to 3/26/91 ~ ~ ~T ~ICATION ~R A PETIT ~ ~ ~0RIDA DEP~~ ~ ~ ~~ TO P~ B~CH CL~ING ON ~CO IS~ Item ,16H2 BID ~91-1685 CONSTRUCTION OF THE AGRICULTURE CENTER - AWARDED TO JL~I, INC., IN TH~ AMOUNT OF $950,000 Item ,1631 CE~CATES OF CORRECTION TO THE TAX ROLLS No. 85 No's. 218/223 NO'S. 260/262 1990 TAX ROLL 1989 TAX ROLL 1988 TAX ROLL Dated 3/12/91 Dated 3/04 - 3/15/91 Dated 3/05 - 3/15/91 000 Page 48 March 19, 1991 No. 296 ~[I'RA~N ~IM~ FOR INMATE A~ 49836 Dated 3/05/91 MI$~OU~ CORKESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR REFERRED The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and or referred to the various departments as indicated below: Grant Adjustment Notice dated 2/28/91 from Gordon L. Guthrie, Director, EMS, Bureau of Public Safety Management, Department of Community Affairs, Subgrantee: BCC, Grant #90-CJ-67-09-21-01-009, Title of Project: Treatment Component, Dated 2/28/91. xc: Neil Dotrill, Jay Reardon, Ken Pineau and filed. Letter dated 3/4/91 from Jon M. Iglehart, Environmental Specialist, Department of Environmental Regulation, to Chairman Goodnight re Collier County-WRR, File No. 111932285. xc: Nell Dotrill, Bill Lorenz, original to Frank Brutt, and filed. Letter dated 3/6/91 from Philip R. Edwards, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Department of Environmental Regulation, to Chairman Goodnight, re Collier County - WRR, Tigertail Beach, File No. 111926265. xc: Filed. Letter dated 3/6/91 from Jon M. Iglehart, Environmental Specialist, Department of Environmental Regulation, to Chairman Goodnight, re Collier County - WRR, File No. 111933325. xc: Filed. Memo dated 2/22/91 from Larry Schneider, Program Administrator, EMS, Department of Health and Rehabtlitative Services, re Reminder - EMS Grant Training Sessions for Current Grantees. xc: Nell Dorrtll, Jay Reardon, Commissioner Goodnight and filed. Memo dated 2/22/91 from Larry Schneider, Program Administrator, EMS, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, re Second Request for Information - Impact of EMS Grants. xc: Nell Dotrill, Jay Reardon, Commissioner Goodnight and filed. CC of letter dated 2/26/91 to Tasha O. Buford, Young, VanAssenderp, Varnadoe and Benton, P.A., from Kirby B. Green, III, Director, Division of Beaches and Shores, Department of Natural Resources, re Approval of Time Extension Permit File Number: CO-254, Permittee Name: LeDauphln Development Corporation. xc: Nell Dotrill, Frank Brutt and filed. Letter dated 3/1/91 to BCC from Tony McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal Engineering and Regulation, Florida Dept. of Natural Resources, re Request for Pubic Comment, File #CO-298, Applicant: Turan and Bonnie C. Ozdtl. Filed. 9. Minutes Received and Filed: Collier County Planning Commission agenda of 3/7/91 and minutes of 12/20/90, 1/3/91, 1/10/91 and 1/17/91. Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Committee minutes of 2/4/91. 000 i72 Page 49 March 19, 1991 C. Golden Gate Parkway Beauttftcatton minutes of 3/12/91. D. Library Advisory Board minutes of 1/24/91. Marco Island Beachfront Renourtshment Advisory Committee minutes of 2/6/91 and agenda for 3/6/91. Marco Island Beachfront Renourishment Advisory Committee minutes of 2/5/91. Tourist Development Council Minutes of 1/30/91 and agenda of 3/1/91. 10. Notice To Owner dated 3/4/91 to BCC from Hughes Supply Inc., advising that they have furnished general construction materials under an order given by Great Monument Construction Co., for the Collier County Raw Water Booster Station, Project #90412. Filed. 11. Notice of Non Payment dated 3/5/91 to H. D. Rutledge & Sons, Carter Contracting, Collier County Board of County Commissioners and United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co., from Ajax Paving Industries, Inc., advising that they have furnished asphalt materials, equipment, trucking and labor for the Collier County Health & Public Services Building, and has not been paid and is owed $48,566. Filed. 12. Preliminary Notice to Owner dated 3/01/91 to BCC from Indurall Coatings, Inc., advising that that they have fur- nished coatings, under an order given by Woodard Painting Co., for the South Collier County Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant, Project #88022. xc: Nell Dorrill, John Yonkosky, Steve Camel] and filed. 13. Copy of the 1989-90 Annual Report of the South Florida Water Management District from James F. Garner, Governing Board Chairman and John R. Wodraska, Executive Director. Filed. There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 5:35 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL '- ' <~ ' HAIRMAN ATTSST '> .. J ;A~ ~C.'GILES,.. CLERK · .... ~ : ".'~,..' · ...~ . ~ ~~. ~{~ approved by the Board on /~/~/ as p~esented . / or as corrected Page 50