Loading...
BCC Minutes 04/16/1991 S Naples, Florida, April 16, 1991 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted bus~ness herein, met on this date at 5:10 P.M. in SPECIAL SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Patricia Anne Goodnight VICE-CHAIRMAN: Michael J. Volpe Richard S. Shanahan Max A. Hasse, Jr. Burr L. Saunders ALSO PRESENT: Annette Guevtn, Deputy Clerk; Netl Dotrill, County Manager; Tom Olliff, Assistant to the County Manager; Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney; Frank Brutt, Community Development Administrator; Ken Baginskt, Planning Services Manager; Barbara Oacchione, Bill Hoover, Bob Mulhere, Wayne Arnold and Philip Schell, Planners; Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Scott Barnett, Sheriff's Office. Page April 16, ~991 · ' Tapo-~1 Item- ORDINAN~ 91-S2 ~ PETITION ~O-g0-~, THE ~0~I~ D~I~ ~Q~ST/NG ~ O~IN~CE ~ING O~IN~C~ 82-2 BY ~ING Sg~ZON B, S~~~Y DZS~ZCT RgG~TIONS, SUBS~CTZON 8.12d. 0~-~ ~ZC~ ~ACZLZTZ~S - P~ZNG ~ LO~ZNG, ZN ORDER TO Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily Ne~s on Harch 1~, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication f/led the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition Z0-90-17, f/led by the Co~unlty Development Division requesting an ordinance ~endtng Ordinance 82-2 tn order to revise off-site parktrig require- Planner Hoover advised the first public hearing for Petition Z0-90-17 was held on ~arch 5, 1991, at ~htch time the Board of County Coatestoners directed Staff to revise portton~ of the proposed amend- ment. He noted in add/t/on to those changes, Staff is seeking revt~e l~age on page 4, 2{e) to read, "The lot proposed for parktn~ permite the same or more Intensive land uses than the lo~ on which the principal structure is located or is co~erctallv zoned." He said Staff is also recommending to chan~e page 12, 4(f), Co begin "~here off-site parktrig is proposed for co~erclal uses, all of the lots pro- poeed for off-site parking shall~ meet ~he locatiohal requirements..." He Indicated the last change t~ the deletion on page 13, off 6(d) its entirety and reletter 6{e) to become 6(d). Commissioner Volpe asked for an e~planatton of the deletion of 6{d). Plier Hoover reported Staff felt it would be ~ore clear to delete the revte~ criteria because of the vague language contained 6(d). C~to~r ~~ ~ed, eeconded ~ Co~t~mtonmF Hmmme ~d c~t~ ~t~1~, to clo~e the public hearing. c~1~ ~1~, t~t P~tltton ZO-90-1T ~ ~pproved with the c~ ~ r~~ed ~ Staff ad that the Ordl~ce a~ n~red tltl~ ~1~ ~ ~pted ~d entered Into Ordl~ce Book No. 45: O~ZN~Cg 91-32 Page 2 April 16, 1991 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY BY AMENDING SECTION 8, SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, SUBSECTION 8.12d., OFF-STREET VEHICULAR FACILITIES PARKING AND LOADING, IN ORDER TO REVISE OFF-SITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. ORDIII&NCE 91-33 RE PETITION Z0-90-18, THOMAS WOOD OF VEGA, BROWN, STANLEY & MARTIN, P.A., REPRESENTING SIGN OF THE VINE RESTAURANT, REqUeSTING AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 82-2 BY ADDING SUBSECTION 8.12f, OFF-~TREB"f VEIIICULAR FACILITIES - PARKING AND LOADING, IN ORDER TO ADD PROVISIONS FOR SHARED PARKING - ADOPTED WITH CHANGES Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 13, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication flied with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition ZO-90-18, filed by Thomas Wood .of Vega, Brown, Stanley & Martin, P.A., repre- senting Sign of the Vine Restaurant, requesting an ordinance amending Ordinance 82-2 by amending Section 8, Supplementary District Regulations, by adding subsection 8.12f, Off-Street Vehicular Facilities - Parking and Loading, in order to add provisions for shared parking. Planner Hoover noted one minor change in the proposal, to accom- modate a recommendation from Long Range Planning, will add 7(g) on page 3 within the review criteria. He said the additional language is as fo1iows: "Approval of the shared parking agreement will be con- sistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan." He explained this addition will consequently change ?(g), (h), ~and [t) to ?(h), (1) and (J). Commissioner Volpe questioned If a mechanism is in place for the County to be made aware of a terminated lease arrangement? Planner Hoover responded the plan is to mark shared parking agreements on the zoning maps to ensure an area reserved for parking is not developed as something else. in addition, he said, shared parking agreements must be filed with the Clerk of Courts. Commissioner Volpe commented that most leases contain a ter- mination clause and once the lease has been terminated, there is no way for the County to track that situation. oi Page 3 April 16, 1991 Ken Bagtnski, Planning Services Manager, explained that language has been developed in the documents that requires notification to the County and other interested persons prior to the termination of a lease. He added that through the Powerhouse Computer System, the County has the ability of building data base systems to record the information, complete with flagging notification on certain dates, etc. He concluded he is very confident that Staff can provide a workable system in a very short period of time. In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Planner Hoover communicated the new ordinance defines Joint parking as two or more land uses utilizing the same parking. He stated the second type of parking is leased parking where, i.e., the land use has insufficient parking spa- ces and wishes to lease vacant adjacent land for that purpose. Tom Wood of Vega, Brown, Stanley & Martin, P.A., representing Sign of the Vine, remarked the proposed amendment will benefit others in addition to Sign of the Vine Restaurant. He said this is a rational f .; solution to a problem that is occurring in Collier County, and many other communities have taken this approach. He stated national com- missions and authorities seem to feel it is a very viable solution. Commissioner Masse asserted he is uncomfortable with a request that is geared around a particular place of business. Mr. Bagtnski remarked that while this request was generated by a ~,' ~ · :~' private individual Staff used the petition as a vehicle to suggest changes and amendments to provide solutions to many concerns in the community. He said shared parking will provide the ability to pre- serve or provide additional green space, open space, as well as reduce the amount of asphalt and unnecessary paved parking spaces, which will be of benefit to the community as a whole. Me admitted there may be difficulties which will primarily Involve the tracking system, '~[~'. 'however, the overall benefits to the community promote this as a solu- .t/on to parking problems. ~1~:~ Shanaban ~v~d, seconded by Coatsslonar H~JSe and c~=Tt~m~n~ly, to close the ~bllc hearing. Z59 Page 4 $1~anah~n moved, seconded by Commissioner Rases and that Petition Z0-90-18 be &pproved u recommended by Staff ~d that the Ordinance as numbered and titled below be ~rpt~d mz~ entered into Ordinance Book No. 43: ORDINANCE 91-33 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY BY ADDING SUBSECTION 8.12f., OFF-STREET VEHICULAR FACILITIES - PARKING AND LOADING, IN ORDER TO ADD PROVISIONS FOR SHARED PARKING; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. O!~]][&~ 91-34 R~ pETITION Z0-89-13, TR~ CONNUNITY D~LO~ S~!~VX~ D~SZON ~STING ~ ~ TO ~ COLLI~ CO~ ZONING ~I~ 82-2, ~ING V~IOUS S~CTIONS TO ~L~ FOR ~O~ HOUSING ~ ~T CON~~ LIVIN~ FACILITIES AS A P~I~D ~INCIP~ US~ OR A ~~ ~O~SION~ USE ~ TO DELETE C~TAIN TE~INOLO~ - Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 10, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication flied with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition Z0-89-13, Petition Z0-89-13 dealing with locatiohal requirements for group housing. He said certain changes have been made to the proposal since the first public hearing on April 2nd. He explained within Section Ten, Staff inadvertently neglected to strike through the following deletion: "(e) rest homes, homes for the aged, adult foster homes, flied by the Community Development Services Division, requesting an amendment to various sections of the Zoning Ordinance to allow for Group Housing and Adult Congregate Living Facilities. Planner Schell noted this is the second public hearing for children's homes, rehabilitation centers, hospices" He related Staff proposes that Section Twenty-Four, 8.53c.1) be revised to read as follows: "Minimum Habitable Floor Area: 1,500 square feet plus 200 sqilare feet per live-in person, beginning with the seventh live-in ~on." He next recommended that Section Twenty-Four, 8.53c.2) be 'changed to read, "Minimum Lot Area: 6,000 square feet plus 1,500 square feet per live-in person, beginning with the seventh live-in person." He said a further change adds to the definition of Adult ,,,'} I Page 5 April 16, 1991 Congregate Living Facility (ACLF) within Section Twenty-Seven as follows: ..."by blood or marriage, who require such services" to be followed by "and to provide limited nursing services when specifically licensed to do so pursuant to Florida Statute 400.40?." The next sen- tencs, he said, stays as is, followed by, "A facility offering per- sonal services or limited nursing services for fewer than four adults is within the meaning of this definition if it formally or informally "~i.' advertises to or solicits the public for residents or referrals and holds itself out to the public to be an establishment which regularly provides such services." He said within the definition of a Care Unit, also within Section Twenty-Seven, Staff is requesting that the -i first sentence read as follows: "A residential treatment facility, :!~:.'"' other than a nursing home, where, for compensation, persons receive food, lodging, and some form of on-site therapeutic care (as appli- cable and required by State and County licensing requirements) on a daily basis." He recommended that the definition of a Family Care Facility be changed to read, "A residential facility designed to be occupied by not more than six (6) residents, plus not more than two (2) live-in supervisors, and constitutes a single dwelling unit (i.e., adult congregate living facilities, foster care facilities, and the developmentally disabled, but not the following types of uses: crisis and attention care, displaced adult care, homeless shelters, mental health care, offender halfway houses, spouse abuse care, substance abuse care, and youth shelters). This use shall be appli- cable to single-family dwelling units and mobile homes." He also requested that the term "resident supervisors" be changed to "not more than four (4) live-in supervisors" within the definition of a Group Care Facility Category I and Category II. He also added "homeless shelters" to the types of facilities allowed in Category II. In answer to Commissioner Shanahan, Planner Schell clarified that a Category II facility is not permitted in the RSF districts, but is allowed in RMF-6 as a Provisional Use. He explained the difference iI between Categories I and II is that Category IX offers a higher level Page 6 ~'l~:~if ', April 16 1991 .:;,, of personal and therapeutic services, which provides for a transition from Family Care Facilities with six or less residents allowed in Category I to a Group Care Facility with seven to fourteen residents. Tony Gualario noted the definition of a Group Housing Unit seems to be ambi~uous because it incorporates the language "independent : housekeeping establishment" and he is not certain what that is. He iJ' ;J' also pointed out the same definition is deficient because a facility containing all sleeping rooms and shared sanitary facilities would constitute no units under the definition which only defines Group · Housing Units as units containing sleeping and sanitary facilities · (' together. ~'." Planner Schell explained the intention of the proposal is to pro- vide an appropriate definition of what a Group Housing Unit is, because the Growth Management Plan under Policy 5.8 allows 26 aroup Housing Units in the urban area. He said it is therefore necessary to provide a clear distinction of Group Housing Units va. dwelling units to avoid the possibility of any attempts to get 26 dwelling units when entitled to a lesser Intensity. Mr. Dualsrio commented, for example, he can build a facility with 50 sleeping rooms which may be more than the 26 per acre definition '[?~ being proposed, but if those sleeping rooms do not have attendant '!(~' . sanitary facilities, he has zero Group Housing Units. .i, Commissioner Saunders suggested that using language in the Zoning iJi ' Ordinance which defines a dwelling unit and eliminating reference to ';~:,. kitchen facilities will solve the problem. Planner Schell suggested the following definition of a Group Housing Unit: "A room or rooms connected together, constituting a separate, Independent housekeeping establishment and physically separated from any other rooms or group housing units, which may be in the same structure, with or without complete kitchens and containing sleeping facilities and sanitary facilities." Tom Olltff, Assistant to the County Manager, suggested for further clarification that the language read," .... with or without complete o8' Page 7 April 1G, 1991 'kitchen f&clllties, with sanitary facilities, and containing sleeping facil~ttes." Coema~mt~ Sh~n~han moved, aeconded by Cow-taeloner Saunders and c~J~n~ntmou~ly, to close the public hearing. Cmemlm~oner Shm~ahan ~ov~d, seconded by Commissioner Hasas and c~F~1~au~u~o~l¥, that Pstltlon Z0-89-13 be approved with the above that the Ordinance u numbered and tltlsd below be adopted into Ordinance Book No. 43= ORDINANCE 91-34 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 7.9, A-2-RURAL AGRICULTURE DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.9b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (g) FAMILY CARE FACILITIES, AMENDING SUBSECTION ?.9b.3), PERMITTED PROVISIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PROVISIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PROVISIONAL USE (p) GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND II) AND CARE UNITS; AMENDING SECTION 7.10, E-ESTATES DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.10b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (b) FAMILY CARE FACILITIES, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.10b.3), PERMITTED PROVISIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PROVISIONAL USE (e) TO DELETE CONVALESCENT HOMES, HOSPICES, REST HOMES, HOMES FOR THE AGED, ADULT FOSTER HOMES, CHILDREN*S HOMES AND REHABILITATION CENTERS, BY ADDING PROVISIONAL USE (f), GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II), CARE UNITS, AND NURSING HOMES; AMENDING SECTION 7.11, RSF-RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.11b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (c) FAMILY CARE FACILITIES, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.11b.3) PERMITTED PROVISIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PROVISIONAL USE (f) TO DELETE REST HOMES, HOMES FOR THE AGED, ADULT FOSTER HOMES, HOSPICES, CHILDRENtS HOMES, AND REHABILITATION CENTERS, AND TO ADD GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I); AMENDING SECTION 7.12, RMF-6-RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.12b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (e) FAMILY CARE FACILITIES, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.12b.3) PERMITTED PROVISIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PROVISIONAL USE (f) TO DELETE REST HOMES, HOMES FOR THE AGED, ADULT FOSTER HOMES, HOSPICES, CHILDRENtS HOMES, AND REHABILITATION CENTERS, AND TO ADD GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II}; AMENDING SECTION ?.13, RMF-12-RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.13b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (e} FAMILY CARE FACILITIES, GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II), CARE UNITS, AND NURSING HOMES; AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.13b.3), PERMITTED PROVISIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PROVISIONAL USE (e} TO DELETE REST HOMES, HOMES FOR THE AGED, ADULT FOSTER HOMES, CHILDREN*S HOMES, REHABILITATION CENTERS, AND HOSPICES, AND TO RELETTER ACCORDINGLY; AMENDING SECTION 7.14, RMF-16-RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.14b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (d) FAMILY CARE FACILITIES, GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II}, CARE UNITS, AND NURSING HOMES; AMENDING SECTION 7.15, RT-RESIDENTIAL TOURIST DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.1§b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (d) FAMILY CARE FACILITIES, GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II), CARE UNITS, AND NURSING HOMES; AMENDING SECTION 7.16, VR-VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION Page 8 April 16, 1991 7.16b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (e) FAMILY CARE FACILITIES, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.18b.3), PERMITTED PROVISIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PROVISIONAL USE (g) TO ADD GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II}, AND BY AMENDING PROVISIONAL USE (p) TO DELETE REST HOMES= AMENDING SECTION 7.17, MHSD-MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION DISTRIGT, AMENDING SUBSEGTION 7.17b.1), PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUGTURES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (c) FAMILY CARE FACILITIES; AMENDING SECTION 7.18, MHRP-MOBILE HOME RENTAL PARK, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.18b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY ADDING PRINCIPAL USE (b) FAMILY CARE FACILITIES; AMENDING SECTION 7.20, C-l-COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.20b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (d) TO ADD CARE UNITS AND GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II) AND TO DELETE HOMES FOR THE AGED, HOSPICES, AND SANATORIUMS, AND BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (g) TO DELETE REST HOMES AND CONVALESCENT CENTERS AND BY REQUIRING NURSING HOMES TO BE SUBJECT TO SECTION 8.53; AMENDING SECTION 7.22, C-3-COMMERCIAL INTERMEDIATE, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.22b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (c} TO ADD CARE UNITS, BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (g) TO ADD GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II), BY AMENDING PRINGIPAL USE (h) TO DELETE HOMES FOR THE AGED AND HOSPICES, BY AMENDING PRINGIPAL USE (1) TO ADD NURSING HOMES, AND BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (p) TO DELETE SANATORIUMS; AMENDING SECTION 7.23, G-4-GOMMERCIAL GENERAL, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.23b.11, PERMITTED PRINGIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PRINGIPAL USE (c) TO ADD CARE UNITS, BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (g) TO ADD GROUP CARE FAGILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II), BY AMENDING PRINGIPAL USE (h) TO DELETE HOMES FOR THE AGED AND HOSPICES, BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (m) TO ADD NURSING HOMES, BY AMENDING PRINGIPAL USE (p) TO DELETE REST HOMES, AND BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (q) TO DELETE SANATORIUMS; AMENDING SECTION 7.24, C-5-COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.24b.1), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (c) TO ADD CARE UNITS, BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (g) TO ADD GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II), BY AMENDING PRINGIPAL USE (h} TO DELETE HOSPICES, BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (m) TO ADD NURSING HOMES, BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (p) TO DELETE REST HOMES, AND BY AMENDING PRINCIPAL USE (q} TO DELETE SANATORIUMS; AMENDING SECTION 7.24.1, C-6-COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL INFILL DISTRIGT, AMENDING SUBSECTION 7.24.1b.3}, PERMITTED PROVISIONAL USES AND STRUCTURES, BY AMENDING PROVISIONAL USE (d) TO DELETE REST HOMES, HOMES FOR THE AGED, ADULT FOSTER HOMES, AND REHABILITATION CENTERS, AND TO ADD CARE UNITS, GROUP CARE FACILITIES (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II), AND NURSING HOMES; AMENDING SECTION 8.23, OFF-STREET PARKING AND STACKING: REQUIRED AMOUNTS, RESIDENTIAL USES, BY ADDING FAMILY GARE FACILITY, GROUP CARE FACILITY (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II), AND CARE UNIT TO THE LISTING OF USES SUBJEGT TO OFF-STREET PARKING AND STACKING CRITERIA AND BY DELETING THE REFERENCE TO CONVALESGENT HOME, HOME FOR THE AGED, AND REHABILITATION FACILITY AND BY DELETING THE TWO (2) PER 5 BEDS CRITERIA AND BY ADDING CRITERIA SET FORTH IN SECTION 8.§3; AMENDING SECTION 8.28, OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS, AMENDING SUBSECTION 8.28¢., TO ADD NURSING HOMES AND CARE UNITS TO THE LISTING OF USES SUBJECT TO OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS; AND BY ADDING A NEW SECTION 8.§3, LOCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUP HOUSING; AMENDING SEGTION 20, DEFINITIONS, TO REVISE THE DEFINITIONS OF "GONVALESGENT HOME", "DETOXIFICATION GENTER", "HOSPIGE", AND "NURSING HOME", AND TO DELETE THE DEFINITION OF "HOME FOR THE AGED", AND TO DEFINE THE FOLLOWING: "ADULT CONGREGATE LIVING FACILITY (AGLF)", "CARE UNIT", "FAMILY GARE FAGILITY", "GROUP GARE FACILITY (CATEGORY I AND CATEGORY II)", "GROUP HOME", "GROUP HOUSING", AND "GROUP HOUSING UNIT"; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFEGTIVE DATE. ooo io 91..A Page 9 April 16, 1991 There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 6:35 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS/ BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL ~'~'~.~ approved by the Board on as presented or as corrected . Page 10