Loading...
BCC Minutes 05/08/1991 S Naples, Florida, May 8, 1991 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also aclin($ as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 6:30 P.M. in SPECIAL SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Patricia Anne Goodnight VICE-CHAIRMAN: Michael 3. Volpe Richard S. Shanahan Max A. Hasse, Jr. Burr L. Saunders ALSO PRESENT: Annette Guevtn and Wanda Arrighi, Deputy Clerks; Netl Dotrill, County Manager; Tom Olliff, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Mark Lawson, Assistant County Attorney; Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney; Frank Brutt, O0~munity Development Administrator; Mike Arnold, Utilities Administrator; Fred Bloetscher, Assistant Utilities Administrator; Mike Newman, Water Director; Martha Skinner, Social Services Director; Chahram Badamtchian and Michelle Edwards, Planners; and Deputy Byron Toml~nson, Sheriff's Office. Page May 8, 1991 Ite~a#$B PETITION Z0-90-21, R~COMMENDATION TO AMEND ORDINANCE 82-2, SECTION 9.9, TO PROVIDE HEIGHT, LIGHTING AND NOISE REGULATIONS FOR N~W D~ELOFMENT ANOUND COLLIER COUNTY AIRPORTS AND TO PROVIDE NOTICE OF POTENTIAL NOISE IMPACTS FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE ESTABLISHED NAPLES AIRPORT NOISE ZONES - CONTINUED TO MAY 22, 1991, FOR SECOND PUBLIC HEARING Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on April 30, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition ZO-90-1, a recommendation to amend Ordinance 82-2, Section 9.9, regarding Airports. Michelle Edwards, Planning Services, presented Petition Z0-90-21, a recommendation to amend Section 9.9 of the Collier County Zoning Ordlnance, which affects the height and lighting limitations on land uses around airports in Collier County. She said this ordinance is also introducing a new section which establishes a noise zone around the Naples Municipal Airport and sets forth sound-proofing require- ments for residences developing within the established noise zone. She stated the first part of the ordinance contains definitions of aviation terms not included in the current Zoning Ordinance. She men- tioned airspace height limitations which are being required for building heights in and around the airports in Collier County, as well as maps which depict the actual boundaries of the various zones. She stated the ordinance also requires all development proposals within the unincorporated part of Collier County around the Naples Municipal Airport which includes construction over 200 feet above ground level, be submitted to the Naples Airport Authority for review and input. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Planner Edwards stated the zones restrict landfills or anything that might produce glare or smoke which would interfere with incoming aircrafts. Planner Edwards continued, stating the second part of the ordi- nance deals with establishing an airport noise zone, as required by the FLUE of the Growth Management Plan. She said Staff has worked wlth the City of Naples, the Naples Airport Authority, the Florida Page 2 May 8, 1991 Department of Transportation's (FDOT) Aviation Bureau and various ordinances from other communities to develop this section of the ordi- nance. Commissioner Volpe questioned who will monitor enforcement of the ordinance? Ms. Edwards responded Community Development Services will review proposals for development within the noise zone to ensure they will meet the sound level reduction requirements specified in the ordinance. She added that a notice will be recorded in the public records stating there is potential noise impact within the established noise zones. She said the maps will also be recorded identifying the zones, as well as the legal descriptions of the zones. As a courtesy, she said, Staff will provide the maps and legal description of the zones to the Bar Association and the Board of Realtors. Commissioner Hasse asked what impact will the new regulations have on existing buildings which may not be sufficiently insulated against noise? Ms. Edwards replied this amendment provides an update to the height requirements which have already been established. With regard to noise, she said the regulations will be imposed only on residential properties requesting improvements, and only the improvements must meet the sound-proofing requirements. Ms. Edwards explained changes to the amendment recommended by the COPC at its May 2, 1991, hearing, stating the changes were made for clarification of the language. John Reed, Florida Regional Representative for Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association and Chairman of the Florida Airspace Utilization Committee, stated both groups have thoroughly reviewed the proposed ordinance and wholeheartedly support it. County Manager Dotrill noted the greatest impacted area for the Naples Municipal Airport seems to be in unincorporated Collier County, and it seems that the County is more worried about heights in predo- minantly industrial and commercial areas as opposed to the City areas. A1 Roberts, Aviation Specialist with FDOT, explained the "footprint" design is a product of the compute~ and is a combination Page 3 May 8, 1991 of number of operations programmed in the future, the prevailing weather which generates where the traffic will take off and land to, and to a certain extent with Naples Municipal Airport, the operational restrictions that noise problems have caused. Therefore, he said, since aircraft operations generally flow in one direction, the sound product will also flow in that direct/on. David Borden stated he is representing the Halstart Partnership who are the developers of the Grey Oaks project. He indicated the Grey Oaks project has a quadrant which is affected by this ordinance. He explained that any parcels that fall partly within the noise zone are considered as being completely within that zone. He communicated his understanding that if a building permit or a subdivision master plan is requested, application of this ordinance will not occur on the areas and buildings that are placed outside of the legally described area, to which Ms. Edwards concurred. In answer to Mr. Borden, Ms. Edwards stated the suggestions made by him at the CCPC meeting with regard to clarification of interior walls have been incorporated into the proposed amendment. Co~/sltoner Shanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and c~ri~ unanilousl~, to close the public hearing. It was noted that the second public hearing for this item will held on May 22, 1991, at 6:30 P.M. R~SOLI2TION 91-S74 R~ PETITION PU-90-33, MICHAEL ARNOLD OF COLLIER ¢OUNT~ ~TILITIES DIVISION, REPRESENTING COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNT~ COMMISSIONERS, REQUESTING PROVISIONAL USE "b" OF SECTION 8.10, ESSE]ITIAL SERVICES, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER TREATMENT PLANT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 8TH A~ENUE N.W., EAST OF C.R. 951 AND VANDERBILT BKA~ ROAD - ADOPTED County Attorney Cuyler noted that this public hearing is a con- tinuation of the item begun on April 23, 1991. Chahram Badamtchtan, Planning Services, presented Petition PU-90-33, Michael Arnold of Collier County Utilities Division, repre- senting Collier County Board of County Commissioners, requesting Provisional Use "b" of Section 8.10, Essential Services, to allow Page 4 May 8, 199~ construction of a water treatment plant for property located on the north side of 8th Avenue N.W. approximately 3,000 feet east of the C.R. 951 and Vanderbilt Beach Road intersection, in Section 35, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, cons/sting of 20.3 acres. He concluded the CCPC recommended approval of Petition PU-90-33. Mike Arnold, Utilities Administrator, mentioned this is the fourth public hearing on this item. He pointed out that Staff is attempting to do everything possible to make the proposed plant as unobtrusive a neighbor as possible. He indicated his hope that his presentation will provide assurances to the residents about their concerns and complaints. He summarized the key issues, including location of the plant, as well as noise, odor control, aesthetics, buffering, access for construction and safety issues. He highlighted the concern of neighbors that the deep well, which is used for in3ection of the reject water from the plant, may possibly contaminate surrounding domestic and agricultural wells. He stated that is not the case, explaining the wells are drilled to a depth of 3,000 feet, which is far below any other existing users in the area. He also noted the construction standards for those types of wells are among the most stringent he has ever seen, and the permitting process itself takes almost one year before the State environmental regulations can be satisfied to ensure there is no opportunity whatsoever for any adverse affects to happen to the well. Mr. Arnold continued, stating Staff is proposing the plant to be held to 55 decibels, measured at the property lines. He informed that Mr. Tanner, a sound expert, took measurements and found the highest dectbel at any per/meter of the site to be approximately 51 decibels. He noted those decibel readings did not take into account additional steps which have been taken in terms of sound-proofing. He explained the design proposes to house all noise generating equipment in noise- suppressed buildings. In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Arnold explained that an average air conditioner outside of a home runs in the range of the Page 5 May 8, 1991 60-65 decibels. In response to a question by Commissioner Hasse concerning access to the site for construction purposes, Mr. Arnold indicated the pro- posed Weber Boulevard access was reviewed by Transportation Services Administrator Archibald who feels that route Is appropriate. He said once construction is finished, the plant will have a minimal impact in terms of the trips generated per day. He communicated that the Sheriff has agreed to Staff's proposal of a contract to employ off- duty deputies during those times of the day when school children will be walking along the road. He also mentioned that construction of a temporary road to avoid use of Weber Boulevard would cost an estimated $50,000-100,000, however, there is no existing legal access or right- of-way for the County to construct such a road. In answer to Commissioner Shanahah, Mr. Arnold stated the CCPC suggested the noise levels at any point around the perimeter of the s~te be l~mited to 25 decibels, which is virtually impossible to achieve. He referred to Mr. Tanner's report, which he entered into the record. (Copy on file with the Clerk to the Board.) In response to a question by Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Paul Bowden w~th Boyle Engineering, stated the sound levels at the peri- meter of the property line, with the plant in operation, will not be ~n excess of the current background levels without the plant. He explained that Mr. Tanner took readings at a similar plant in Cape Coral and estimated the numbers at the plant boundary. Mr. Arnold continued with the next issue, odor control. He informed that Staff is proposing to install a hydrogen sulfide control system to be equipped with state-of-the-art scrubbers. He said upon completion of construction of that system, and concurrent with plant start-up, Staff will take measurements at the property lines to test the effectiveness of the equipment. He stated if the equipment is not sufficient, the County would be required to take remedial steps to meet a recommended threshold at the property line of one tenth of a part per mill/on of concentration in the air. He said they also pro- Page 6 May 8, 1991 pose to incorporate a continuous monitoring of the odor control system into the plant's computerized control system, so that any malfunction would be immediately known to the operators for repair. Mr. Bowden answered Commissioner Shanahan by explaining that according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) manual, there will be no discernible odor at the threshold being recommended. He also called attention to the safety procedures which will be insti- tuted with regard to the necessary chemica]s at the plant site, indi- cating they will be stored in a bulk storage tank inside a containment area consisting of concrete walls and slab. He said there will also be leak detection equipment, consisting of a vacuum system which will not allow gas to escape. Mr. Arnold stated another issue is the height of the storage tanks which are proposed to be approximately 160 feet in diameter and 65 fe.t high at the top of domes. He said the tanks will be located at the center of the site to take advantage of buffering provided by surrounding trees which reach 50-60 feet in height. He also noted the future expansion of the plant to its 20-milllon gallon per day capacity will not result in the building being expanded, as the only additional construction will be the second tank. He referred to an exhibit which he stated showed what the proposed plant will look like from 8th Avenue N.W. He said a wall matching the architectural treat- ment of the building will be constructed surrounded by landscape buf- fering. He noted there must be security fencing around the remainder . of the plant site for liability reasons as well as for the safety of the plant operators. In answer to Commissioner Shanahah, Mr. Arnold stated the chain link fencing will be located far enough back on the site so as not to be visible from 8th Avenue N.W. Mr. Bender spoke for area residents in opposition to the petition for the following reasons: their desire to have the plant relocated; safety issues regarding children walking on Weber Boulevard during healy construction traffic; safety and health concerns associated with May 8, 1991 hazardous chemicals being transported through a residential area; there will be no buffering between the plant site and the reslden- ttally zoned area; and trees and shrubs have little or no affect on noise abatement. Tim Curran, Managing Engineer for the Ft. Myers Office of Boyle Engineering, addressed the concerns regarding the use of chlorine at the plant. He stated the plant will be operated 24-hours per day and will have state-of-the-art safety features. He noted all requirements by regulatory agencies have been met or exceeded. He informed that accidents Involving chlorine gas were historically operational and have virtually been eliminated by the advent of the all vacuum system, which this plant will be utilizing. He mentioned the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) draft report which Mr. Bender provided to the Board regarding the Cape Coral plant. (Copy on file with the Clerk to the Board. ) He said EPA's concern was not to dispute the safety of the design of the gas feeding equipment or the facilities in place, rather it addressed concerns with the potential of 21 such facilities within the city of Cape Coral. He stated that alone increases the potential for an accident. He advised the EPA did not recommend that the city retrofit their existing water plant and wastewater plants, which are located in residential areas and next to schools. Mr. Gutran next addressed the options of alternative chemicals to chlorine, stating it would cost approximately five times the gas feed system. He explained the sodium hypochlortde which is commercially available in this part of the country is only 10~ active chemical, therefore, the County would be paying for the transportation of nine times the volume of liquid that will actually be used. $s De1~uty Clerk Arright replaced Deputy Clerk auevtn at this time ~= Water Director Mike Newman advised that every operator working for the County in the Water or Waste Water Departments are trained to handle any type of chlorine leak. Commissioner Hasse expressed concern regarding the comment made Page 8 Nay 8, 1991 ' that there is a danger zone within ten miles of the plant. Mr. Newman .;.~ explained that this would be true if no one responded to a leak; however, the County's facilities are manned 24 hours a day and ? days -, a week with qualified personnel who are prepared at all time to deal ;:~. with this kind of emergency. .:~F In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Newman described that the chlorine cylinders are transported to the plant on a flatbed truck from Tampa and are removed from the truck by special equipment and ~ . placed in a chalk block area. He explained to Commissioner Hasse that the cylinders are kept shaded because gas will expand if left in the heat; however, there are fusable plugs which will prevent a complete rupture and allow time to make necessary repairs to the cylinder and have it removed. The following speakers spoke in opposition to Petition No. PU~90.33: Tell Ann Gatdiner Carol Mastno Teresa Semcer Gary Ttedemann Maria M. Tledeman Barbara Gatdiner Jeanne M. Dake Joan D. Mazzocchl Pete Mazzocchi Sandra Jurek John Latal Margaret Bender Aaron Gardiner Toni L. Martin-Williams Ed Semcer Lanette K. Ohm Ronald Bender Carol Fell Georgia L. McKtnney, representing the Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Assoclation Ed Carlson George Keller, President of C~11~er County Civic Federation Jerry Prtmus Robert Walker, Jr. Anne Ross The following reasons were given by the above speakers who spoke in opposition: The dangerous chemicals and toxic gases involved in the operation of the plant; the possibility of local water con- tamination from chemical spills; air pollution; the bad odor and noise OOOP~¢-'~ 11 Page 9 May 8, 1991 produced by the plant; residents of the area where the plant will be constructed will not benefit from the water; the plant should be located in the area that benefits from it; the treatment plant is too close to the res~dential property lines; alternate sites that are less residential in nature and larger in acreage should be considered; con- cerns about the increase in truck traffic and overall traffic during the construction period of the plant which poses a danger to the children walking along the road to school as' well as the deterioration of the roads; the traffic impact on Weber Avenue which is a no-outlet street and the potential safety hazard; the danger to the children during the installation of the pipes to the plant; the danger of potential fire resulting from the plant; potential personal health problems the plant will cause; the detriment to the land; safety for the people living behind where the proposed plant is to be constructed because in the case of a chlorine leak there would be no way for these people to evacuate without having to go directly by the plant; how will the people be notified in case of a chlorine leak; an industrial operation is being imposed on a residential neighborhood which is wrong; the residents of this area should have been notified and informed that the Oounty was planning for this treatment plant to be located on the subject site before the condemnation of land was made; and there are no guarantees that something will not go wrong as it did at the Lely treatment facility. The following speaker spoke in favor of Petition No. PU-90-33: Don Pickworth, representing the owners of the property condemned for the treatment plant Bill Barton Chester Dobeck John Keschl The following reasons were given by the above speakers who spoke in favor of Petition No. PU-90-33: The plant should be built wlth the proper stipulations and conditions imposed on it in regards to noise, odor, landscaping, etc. so it will be a good neighbor (stipulations presented to the Board, not provided for the record); the treatment plante are not as they are perceived in that they are not noisy nor do Page 10 Hay 8, they produce an odor, and chlorine gas is used all over the County; chlorine gas is a safe, efficient, economical mechanism for disinfec- ting; another treatment plant built in the County approximately nine years ago, which was also strongly opposed to by the residents of the area, has experienced no problems nor have there been any complaints; and the Collier County government plans for only the best facilities in the County. In response to some of the accusations against the subject loca- tion of the treatment plant, Mr. Arnold noted that the County is taking all the steps possible to address the potential hazards which are minimal, and the fire department in the subject area has planned for this treatment plant and has prepared an evacuation route if the need becomes necessary. He advised that in regards to the roads affected, once the plant is completed both Weber and 8th Avenues will be resurfaced. He cited that the Lely facility is being redesigned to include the desi~ning of the proposed facility. Commissioner Goodnight clarified that all associated costs involved with the construction of the treatment plant including the resurfacing of the road will be paid from the water and sewer district users through impact fees. Commissioner Hasse pointed out that should a resident in Golden Gate Estates want to be connected to the treatment plant they could do so, and added that they would pay the same impact fee and assessment that the people are paying that are being connected in the northern areas of the County. County Attorney Cuyler explained that the County did a quick take buy for the property and applied the good faith appraisal into the court registry. He confirmed that the County does hold the title to the property. Commissioner Goodnight commented that she is concerned about the traffic which will be generated by the construction of the facility and stated that she does not feel this is a good location for the facility, and it should be placed elsewhere. ooo,, Page 11 Nay 8, 1991 c~-~t~.~t~:nl~l¥, tl~t the public hearing be cloeed. · s At thtl ti~ D~puty Clerk ~u~vin replaced Deputy Clerk Arright *' Commissioner Volpe mentioned that much discussion has occurred regarding the site location. Mr. Arnold informed that the general looation of the plant site was identified in 1989, after which a resolution was adopted approving the investigation of several different sites with this one chosen as .the best opportunity. Commissioner Volpe ~ndicated his concern with the safety of children in the area. He asked if Weber Boulevard will be built to County standards when it is improved? Mr. Arnold stated Weber Boulevard is currently 20 feet wide and Cottnty standards call for a roadway to be 24 feet in Width. He cautioned that when Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension is completed by either the Olde Florida Golf Course or the County, Weber Boulevard will tie into it which classifies it as a minor collector road. He said that will generate traffic which may be perceived as detrimental to the neighborhood. He suggested, therefore, that Weber Boulevard be expanded to County standards and include a sidewalk along that corri- dor for the safety of children. Commissioner Saunders asked what provisions have been made for the possibility of forest fires in that area and if there will be a aprinkier system in the plant? Mr. Bowden advised that fire hydrants have been sit%ated throughout the site. He said a sprinkler system is not required inside the plant. Commissioner Saunders questioned if this item is approved with the condition that the only access to the plant for construction and operations will be from the extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road, what doea that do to the current plans? Mr. Arnold indicated that con- dition will add cost to the proposal, however, it will go a long way to alleviate the concerns of the residents in the area. In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Bowden stated if the tank 14 Page 12 May 8, 1991 heights are lowered to 35 feet from §6 feet, the diameter will expand to approximately 210 feet, and will result in many more trees removed from the site. Commissioner Shanahan inquired if the site were moved, what delay will occur regarding the water availability to the regional water system? Mr. Arnold advised that will put the County into a building moratorium situation in some locations. Commissioner Saunders communicated that one of the major concerns of many people is the possibility of a chlorine leak resulting in harm to animals and humans. He asked if it would be possible to place a sprinkler system in and around the chlorine tanks and the facilities where chlorine is being transferred, which can be triggered by the alarm being installed to detect possible leaks? Mr. Bowden indicated that would be possible. Mike Newman, Water Director, clarified that the sprinkler system cannot be inside the chlorine storage area because water cannot be put directly on chlorine. He said spray devices can be installed outside, which will create a water curtain around the exterior of the building automatically when set off by the alarm. He stated as the chlorine moved into the falling water, it would be dragged directly to the ground. In answer to Commissioner Shanahah, Mr. Arnold stated the drilling process for the deep well will take approximately two weeks to 30 days. Commissioner Shanahan asked for a response to one of the speaker's comments concerning the violation of her constitutional rights. County Attorney Cuyler advised the public purpose and necessity has to be established for that parcel of property through the eminent domain proceeding. He said since title has transferred, it was a Judicial determination that in fact, the public purpose and necessity were pre- sent in that parcel for this use. Co~sa/oller Volpe moved. seconded by Commissioner Shanahan and C~ZTi~ 4/1 (Com~tssioner Goodnight opposed), to approve Petition 1991 1'~--90-3S-, subject to the stipulations submitted by Mr. Arnold dated 5/8/91 and with the additional stipulations that all traffic, :? * ~lon amd operational, b~ brought from C.R. 951 along V~ilt ~a~h ~d ~gtanston; that a sprinkler ~ystam in relation to tla~.etera~ of chlorine be installed as described by Mr. Raw. an; that etd~e~lk~ be constructed on the east side of Weber Boulevard froa Gol~ ~te l$o~lev~rd through at leaat 7th Avenue N.W. In conjunction thereby adopting Resolution 91-374. Page 14 May 8, 1991 e$$ ~c~: 11:10 P.N. - Reconvened: 11:20 P.M. at which t~ D~%~ Clerk Arrtghi replaced Deputy Clerk Guevin ~N~ ~~ es-96 - CO~I~.D T0 ~Y 22, 1991 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily Ne~s on April 30, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit o~ Publication flied with the Olerk, public heartn~ was opened to consider an ordinance to be ~o~ as the Pa~ks and Recreational Facilities Impact Fee Ordinance amending Ordinance 88-96. ~ounty Attorney Cuyler informed that this is the ~lrst of two public hearings on this sub3ect. Assist~t County Attorney Cronin informed that the two ma3or items chan~ln~ O~dinance 88-96 are the merger of the districts and an increase In ~ates. He explained that five of the seven districts will be merged into one district, and pointed out on the display map the bo~da~y of the combined districts. He advised that the current impaot fee rate for the regional park impact fee is $144 per dwelling ~it which is scheduled to increase In October, 1991, to $146 per dwellin~ unit, but at the time of adoption of the proposed amendment the fee will Increase to $179 per dwellln~ unlt. He added that for comity pa~ks the curment fee is $~78 per dwelling unit and the pro- posed Increase will bring it to $399 per dwelltnu unit. He noted that the Pl~nln~ Co~lssion did reco~ended their unanimous approval. ~esi~r S~ers ~ved, ~conded ~ Co~tssioner c~ig mmly, that the ~bltc hearing ~ closed. [tth t~ couems of the ~ard, the proceed Parks ~d ~N~tl~l l~ctllttes I~ct Fe~ Ordtn~ce ~endtng Ordtn~ce 88-96 S ~t/ ~ttl ~y 22, 1991. ~O~ 0~~ ~ING ~R ZONING ~OATION O~IN~C~, ~~ TO ~ STZ~D S~~ A~g~ BE~N T~ BO~ OF C~~ ~. - CO~I~D TO ~Y 22, 1991 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 30, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication flied with Page May 8, 1991 the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider an ordinance amending Ordinance 90-23, the Zoning Reevaluatton Ordinance, pursuant to the stipulated Settlement Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and James K. Kessler and the Ctttzen's Political Gonunittee, Inc. Commissioner Goodnight noted that this is the first of two public hearing regarding this sub3ect. Assistant County Attorney Student informed that the proposed amendment to the Zoning Resvaluation Ordinance is the implementation of the Settlement Agreement which the Board of County Commissioners agreed upon in March, 1991. She informed that the proposed ordinance will allow for expanded participation in the appeal to the Board of County Commissioners for the compatibility exception determination of the Growth Management Director as well as the hearing officer's deter- mination of vested rights and the appeal of the decision of the Board of County Commissioners to the Circuit Court. She added that the pro- posed ordinance was approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. Cos~tssionsr Shanahen sovsd, seconded by 0oamisstonsr Saunders and ¢~rte~d unani~o~sly, that the public hearing be closed. Nith the consensus of the Board, the proposed ordinance amending ~ Zo~lz~ Ree~mluation Ordinance, pursuant to the stipulated Settlement Aff~eemenT was continued until May 22, 1991. There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 11:30 P.M. /~. ..."¥: . ....... ~ .~;. .','' ._.. ~ :, 6- .. . .~t~t c'~: ' . . .',:,- .; ;~ ~'. ~ . as pre~nted or as corrected BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL PATR~CHAIRMAI;