BCC Minutes 08/27/1991 R Naples, Florida, August 27, 1991
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building
"F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN:
VICE-CHAIRMAN:
Patricia Anne Goodnight
Michael J. Volpe
(ABSENT)
Richard S. Shanahan
Max A. Hasse, Jr.
Burr L. Saunders
ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk; John Yonkosky, Finance
.~..Director; ~.llie Hoffman, Debby Fartie, Annette Guevtn and Wanda
Arrtght, Deputy Clerks; Net1 Dotrill, County Manager; Tom Olliff and
Jennifer Pike, Assistants to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County
Attorney; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator;
/"/-'.Frank Brutt, Community Develupment Services Administrator- Leo Ochs,
Ad~inietratt~e Services Administrator; Bob Blanchard, Growth Planning
Director; Martha Sktnner, Acting Public Services Administrator;
Barbara Cacchione, Chahran Badamtchtan, and Robert Lord, Planners;
Barbara Prynosk!, Environmental Specialist; Sue Ftlson, Administrative
;!~Aeeletant to the Board; and Lieutenant Byron Tomltnson, Shertff's
Page
AugUst 2?, 199!
C4mm~uloner Shanaham moved, e,~conded by Cosualsstoner Haeee and
., :.c~z'z'ied 4/0, that the agenda and coneent agenda be approved with the
Item #16D1 Moved to ,9D1- Award of contract for construction
of C.R. 951 and Immokalee Road East Water Main Projects -
County Bids #91-1727 and #91-1728. (Requested by the
Commission).
o
Item ,16A3 To be heard with Item #6C2 - Recommendation to
approve for recording the final plat of "Glendevon Replat at
Wyndemere". (Requested by Staff).
Item #16A4 To be heard with Item #9B1- Recommendation to
approve for recording the final plat of "Palmetto Ridge" and
grant preliminary ,lcceptance of the roadway, drainage, water
and sewer Improvements. (Requested by Staff).
Item #8A - R. Bruce Andstolon, regarding Settlement of State
Road g51 Condemnation Action. - Continued to 9/3/91.
(Requested by Petitioner).
Item #16E4 - Recommendation to approve and execute a Limited
Use Llcense Agreement between Collier County and the Collier
County Democratic Club approving the use of County-owned pro-
perty for a Labor Day picnic and fund-raising event -
Deleted, no date set. (Requested by Staff).
So
Item #9C1 - Recommendation that the Board receive and con-
elder the Homeless Plan for Collier County as presented by
the Home/ess Advisory Committee - To be heard at 10:00 A.M.
Item #9E3 - Statue Report on the Proposed YMCA Facility in
Golden Gate Estates - To be heard at 9:30 A.M.
Item #16B2 Moved to ~9D4 - Recommendation to adopt a
Resolution authorizing the acquisition of right-of-way
required for the construction of road, utility and drainage
Improvements to Airport Road (CR-31), at both the Estey
Avenue Intersection and the Davis Boulevard intersection (a
portion of CIE No. 003), and to grant to staff the authority
to streamline and compress standard operating procedures in
order to expedite right-of-way acquisition and construction.
(Requested by Commissioner Volpe).
Item #16E3 Moved to #9E4 - Recommendation to establish new
pay titles and change two current pay titles. (Requested by
Commissioner Volpe).
The motion for approval of the Consent Agenda ls noted under Item
#16.
m ooo. . 09
Page 2
August 27, 1991
'~i[The motion for approval of the Clerk's Report is noted under
OF THI BUI~3KT M~RESHOP MIETINGS OF ~ 27 ~, 28 1991,
c~ 4/0, tht the n~nuteo of the ~dget Morkohop M~tlnp of
28, 1991, ~ a~r~ ao preoented.
Commissioner Hasse presented services awards to the following
~ollier Co~ty employees:
~ie ~. Butts - Veterans Service - 20 years
Fred M. NcDaniel - Facilities Management - 10 years
~O~DTX0~ 91-551, 1~ FETXTXON AV-91-004, LOCKHART ENGXNE~RXNG, INC., FOR (~ER, ~L~NDEVON D~VELOPMKNT, REQUESTING VACATION OF LOTS
AND OUT~OT #2 LOCATED ON A PORTION OF THE PLAT OF GLEND~VON AT
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
July 28 and Auffuet 4, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication
filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition
',AV-91-004, filed by Lockhart Engineering as agent for owner, Glendevon
Development, requesting vacation for the purpose of replatttng pro-
for residential lots for proposed villas and duplexes in
Wyndemere,
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald advised that this
a request to vacate Lots 29-36 and Outlot #2 of the plat of
~,Glandevon at Wyndemere. He noted that this item is a companion to
i-f]i'teB #6C2(A) which is the request for final plat approval.
· Mr. Archibald announced that Glendevon consists of 36 lots, pri-
'~arily for a villa t~pe development. He remarked that the shape of
~! these lots require some planning relative to p/acing a house and dri-
Page 3
August 27, 1991
.i~.~e~¥ on same in addition to providing pools and other Improvements.
i~iHe Indicated that the internal development is surrounded by one of the
~.fgolf courses at Nyndemere. He stated that the petitioner desires to
vacate the lot lines and replat 8 of the villa lots. Re reported that
letters of no objection have been received from the Utilities and the
iation.
Hr. Archibald advised that one letter of objection has been
:received, from a neighbor across the street, citing that he will be
a side lot line rather than a front lot line. He remarked that
i~.' staff has no objection to the vacation.
Attorney Kathleen Passtdomo, representing the Petitioner, advised
that six of the proposed duplex villas located on the north side of
; Glendevon Drive backed up to the two story condominium buildings and
~... the prospective buyers raised concerns In this regard which created a
fmarkettng problem. She explained ~hat Glendevon Drive is approxima-
tely 600' long with six driveways converging into this street, noting
,that the developer had concerns that this would create somewhat of a
[:traffic hazard. She reported that under the existing plat, the deve-
· '-'loper could have moved the buildings back with the leisure areas in
..-'.front of the residences, but instead, the residences are now turned
the driveways on the south side of the road which would present a
/~'better street scape.
~"" Attorney Passtdomo advised that the objecting neighbor, Mr. Ftkes,
tinder the impression that the landscaping and design plan would
create a visual problem to him, however, there will now be a green
space and one driveway as opposed to six driveways converging onto
Glendevon Drive. She noted that approval has been obtained from the
~%/nde~ers Architectural Review Gommtttee in 1990 and a meeting was
this spring with the Glendevon Homeowners Association and there
!:Was no objection.
":.. Mr. Eric Ebsrhardt, President, Glendevon Development Company,
,lained that there is no density change in the replat.
~here were no speakers.
Page 4
August: 2?, 1991
r.4.~lm:ar ~ .oved, ~econd~d by Cou~..~o~ ~ ~d
4/0, ~o
~~L~ S~ ~, seconded ~ CouLssLoner Vo~ ~d
4/0, to I~r~ PetLt~ AV-9~-004, thereby adopting
Page 5
August 27, 1991
01-B~2, ArI'~O~ZZ2X~ ~ ACCLFI'AXC~ O~ GL~ON ~ A~
This 1tam was heard in conjunction with Companion Petition
AV-91-004, as discussed above.
~wlm~e~ Sh~mhan ~oved, Hconded by Contactoner Volpe ~nd
4/0, to ~pprov~ for recording the final plat of 'Glendevon
at W~m~e~ere' and that Resolution 91-532 b~ adopted.
Page 6
August 27, 1991
~T&TO~ ~ ON Tl~ FROPOSED YMCA FAC~L~ IN GOLDEN ~ ~STAT~S -
A~ ~LZFZ~ AT NO COST TO CO~; ST~ TO ~S~ O~
I~~ 8~ ~ ~Z~ GO~ ~ ~ST~ P~ TO D~Z~ ZF
C~ ~ ~S8~BLE ~N GOLDEN OA~ ESTATES
Administrative Services Administrator Ochs advised that on August
13, 1991, the Commission voted to reconsider the previously approved
sale agreement of the Combs' parcel that was intended to be the site
for the YMCA in the Golden Gate Estates. He indicated that since that
reconstderation vote, the Golden Gate Estates Citizens Advisory
'.Committee voted unanimously against the location of the YMCA on said
"" site In addition to voting against the location of the YMCA along
in the Estates area.
. Mr. Ochs stated that the Executive Summary outlines four options
for the Board'8 consideration but staff is offering two additional
options:
1.
Authorize staff to terminate the agreement for sale and
purchase with Mr. Combs dated July 23, 1991, as previously
recommended by the Golden Gate Estates Citizens Advisory
Committee.
Direct the Citizens Advisory Committee to seek suggestions
for expenditures of the funds in the GAC Land Trust through
public meetings and surveys of the residents in the area to
determine if recreational facilities are considered viable
and necessary for that area.
Commissioner Hasse remarked that there have been questions with
.regard to the legality of using Avatar funds for a facility of this
.·~ature. He questioned whether the proposed location is the best site
for this facility and if any of the Master Plan concepts are being
Violated. He noted that the YMCA is a good organization but suggested
the Committee and the Real Property Department review these
?' County Attorney Cuyler stated that an appropriate agreement needs
to be structured between the YMCA and the County. He noted that the
between Avatar and the County says "Governmental
items". He advised if the YMCA intends to run its operation in
'the eae manner as the facility on Pine Ridge Road, there may be a
~':: ' problem, but if there is an appropriate agreement between the County
Page 7
August 2?, 1991
Slid the "Y", it could be structured so that there is a sufficient
umbrella of governmental involvement that a court would construe to be
~!:~,[a governmental facility.
Commissioner Volpe explained that he understood that the survey,
as to the needs or desires of the Golden Gate Estates community with
", regard to a recreational type facility, had already been completed
Commissioner Goodnight replied that she has the results of that
survey, however, it was conducted three years ago. She suggested that
~the GAC Trust Committee and staff do a mail out survey and hold public
hearings to determine the desires of the residents as to how the money
i?Y'-~ Co~isstoner Shanahah stated that he shares the concerns of the
neighborhood people that this is not the proper location but a "Y" is
an essential need in Golden Gate. He cited whether the money is being
spent properly with regard to the utilization of the GAC Trust funds.
He indicated that he has furthest concerns whether there is consistency
~th the Growth Management Plan.
Commissioner Volpe remarked tha~ consideration will need to be
.:~'::gAven to an amendment to the Golden Gate Master Plan to allow any t~/pe
recreational use in residential neighborhoods.
Mr. Dick Braun, Chairman, Golden Gate Estates Advisory Committee,
:~4-
[i.i stated that approximately one year ago, a meeting was held with Dr.
Rtchey and members of the School Board with respect to the 10 acres
.behind the Big Cypress Elementary School being used for a recreational
,:.~Fea with a swimming pool. He noted that the School Board voiced sup-
'port of this proposal in addition to offering two a/ternate sites for
consideration. He explained that the Committee was advised by Public
.Services Administrator O'Donnell that the County would not go along
w~th this proposal since It was the policy of the Commission that a
;- ~lnlsrttm of 40 acres be utilized for the park.
The following persons spoke in opposition to the YMCA facility at
proposed site:
Mr. Richard DeWulf
Mr. Terence Bonard
Mr. Ji. Colletta ~ ~"~'[ ~7
Page 8
August 27, 199!
Mary Karoly
',~ Mr. Dan Stallaria
'Nro Bob Mast (w/petition)
Thoaa persons speaking in opposition to the proposed site, raised
~:the following concerns: a commercial entity would be intruding into a
Feaidentia! area; an alternate site should be considered; Avatar funds
should not be used for this facility; the second "Y" facility should
be at least 12 miles from the current facility on Pine Ridge Road; the
Golden Gate Master Plan should not be, amended and Avatar funds should
not be used for a non-governmental enterprise; feed back should be
obtained from the survey but provide an alternate for a community can-
tar, with a swimming pool and day care funded with Avatar funds with a
self taxing district to support same; and most of the Golden Gate
Estates residents can not afford the membership dues at the YMCA.
Attorney David Leigh, representing Ken and Sandy Griggs, owners of
the ABC Academy and Bob and Sandy Gibbons of the ABC Tnfant Toddler
Center, expressed that his clients oppose the use of Avatar funds for
the YMCA ~acility. He noted that his clients operate a private faci-
lity and the "Y" is in direct competition with their business. He
that governmental useage for general County funds is not the
~..sae as governmental useage with respect to trust funds used in the
private agreement. He suggested that the YMCA should provide its
· funding in the normal course and not through the Avatar funds. He
Faurked that there is also a freedom of religion clause to be con-
!~.iaidered and the United States Constitution provides that government
cannot support any form of religious expression, and this is the Young
Men's Christian Association. He concurred that the suggestion of a
...;...survey is a fine idea, particularly with respect to location, but the
:~se of Avatar funds is a legal question that needs to be answered.
~' Mr. Gila Sievers, Director, YMCA, stated that many things have
expressed about the "Y" which are totally erroneous. He pointed
that the YMCA was approached because the County and other munici-
services told the Avatar Trust Citizens Committee that they could
within the next decade, provide recreational services to the
August 27, 1991
~'~statee, and questioned whether the "Y" would be interested tn doing
: so if help was given upfront by making property available to lease and
providing $700,000-$800,000 to construct a facility. He explained
<~ that the "Y" was not attempting to spread or influence their mission
into the Golden Gate Estates, but merely to be helpful. He noted that
the "Y" is not a private organization which intends to profit off
anyone. He indicated that the membership is very affordable and over
$200,000 in free memberships is subsidized for any child or adult who
cannot afford the regular fees of the YMCA. He advised that the "Y"
does not provide child care on a competitive basis, noting that scho-
/arehips are provided for any child whose parents cannot afford to
place him in child care. He indicated that the YMCA is an organiza-
tion that wishes to help out wherever possible with the best resources
they can muster. He reported that the "Y" is an organization of
people but not a corporation of individuals trying to gain influence,
etc. He related that the "Y" is ready to continue to help in the
Golden Gate Estates area if the people desire same.
Chief Planner Cacchtone announced that public hearings relating to
Comp Plan Amendments are scheduled before the Planning Commission on
.i:..September 5th and on September 25th before the Board of County
i'Commtssioners. She explained that once the State receives the amend-
~ente, there will be approximately X00 days before they come back for
final public hearings. She noted that changes may be made between
time of transmittal and the final adoption but those changes
~should be of a minor nature since the Department of Community Affairs
.,:..has the ability to object to major changes after transmittal. She
reported if a Comp Plan amendment is necessary but does not occur in
i~'thte cycle, the next cycle would be March, 1992 to begin the process
with final adoption in March, ~993.
Co~iseloner Shanahah stated that he Is pleased that the "Y" had
e~l opportunity to address and articulate their position, noting that
'h~ believes that they have been an innocent victim. He suggested that
i~he agreement with Mr. Combs be nullified. He remarked that he does
August 2?, 1991
feel that the Golden Gate Maoter Plan should be amended, however,
concllrrence with the idea of the survey.
0e~Ltmt~F~ ~ae ~oved, seconded by Co~t~ioner S~ ~d
~~ 4/0, ~t Staff ~ dtF~ to advise Mr. Co~be of the
~a at ~ ~mt to t~ 0~W~ t~t Staff ~d the 0oattta F~I
o~ ~~1 e~te. ~v~ co~derat~on to the ~es~b~l~ of ut~-
~ ~tl ~lr PI~ to ~tl~ne whether a Co~it~ Center ~e
'~, !t~VISXO~ OF T~O EXISTING STAFF TXTLRS AND POSITIONS, IMPLI~ENTATION OF
"-" C0~L~EIt COUNTerS AFFORDABL~ HOUSXNG PROGRAMS AND R~STRUCTURING OF THE
~XBZLZTZ!~ OF TI~ HOUSING AND URBAN IMPROVEMENT DEPARTMENT (HUI)
:i:. County Manager Dotrill recapped his previous instructions from the
Board of County Commissioners regarding this item. He concluded that
;t . available resources have been directed in too many areas, and that ~he
· - Board of County Commissioners made a conscious effort to refrain from
~i'j'attempting to own or operate public housing, and to instead offer
incentives to private developers. He reflected that the focus of the
,artmerit needs to be in conjunction with private developers but at a
higher plane of analysis and recommendation to the Board of County
t.. ~Commiaetoners. He proposed reorganization of the HUD Section 8 Rental
/~]:~Asslstance Program by transferring it, under agreement, to the Collier
ounty Housing Authority He explained that the proposed changes will
result in a net decrease of budget appropriations, with a net decrease
two employees to be transferred with the Rental Assistance Program.
reiterated that his suggestion is to reclassify the Housing
Director~s Job to the current position classification grade of ~27,
is an increase, and merely reclassify and provide a new Job
i~]deecription for the Analyst position within the existing grade that
Page
August 2?, 199!
~'1ts currently classified, with these suggestions to be effective
Co~ualesioner Shanahan relayed his feeling that the senior level
~ager position identification is the right structure and will acco-
[."Modata and accomplish some of the goals and objectives of the Board
County Coutssionsrs.
Co~mtssioner Volpe voiced support for the conceptual reorganiza-
as proposed.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, County Manager Dorrill con-
'!~ *:~cluded that October let is the time frame for implementation. He
reported meeting with CURE representatives last week, who understand
and ~upport his general division concept in aligning departments within
one of seven divisions. He confirmed that for the initlal six months
the department will report directly to the County Manager's Office, as
i, do the Budget and Capital Project Offices.
~i In answer to Commissioner Volpe, County Manager Dotrill stated
that the Interlocal Agreement with the Collier County Housing
': Authority can be brought back to the Board of County Commissioners for
rat~fication on or about 10/~. He reported that in ozder to be a
.~Sectton 8 rental assistance provider, certification by the federal
is necessary and, therefore, the Housing Authority will
.have to submit an application to be an eligible agency to receive
these funds. He explained that the basic agreement between Collier
· Co~lnty and the Housing Authority can be accomplished by October /st.
Ophelia Allen, Chairwoman of the Housing Committee of Collier
United for Rights and Equality (CURE}, asked those present in support
of staff's proposal to stand (a number of persons stood). She stated
that the proposal is creative and practical, shifts existing resources
to ~ake affordable housing a priority, and saves taxpayers a substan-
e~ount of money.
Fred Tarrant, member of Taxpayer Action Group of Collier County
"!.(TAG), stated that his organization concurs with Ms. Allen's position
:of support.
He suggested that naming the Assistant County Manager as
Page 12
August 27, 1991
new Director of Housing is the wrong thing to do, and that making
a motion and passing it regarding this issue prior to having a
contract in place with HUD or the Housing Authority is premature.
County M~lager Dorrill reiterated that the position title in the
immediate instance is Affordable Housing Director. He acknowledged
., that the plan, as presented today, is a conceptual one and will not be
.'.':.', in effect until October 1.
[.. ,. Commissioner Shanahan interjected that perhaps it has erroneously
b~en reported that the title was to be Assistant County Manager, but
%hat now stands corrected. He agreed that there is a need to
streamline the process.
Mr. Tarrant stated he hopes those making $8,000 to $15,000 yearly
. will get the primary attention and benefit of this program.
~.~ ' Frances C. Barsh, speaking for Taxpayer Action Group of Collier
~, (TAG), reflected that the goal is to provide affordable housing
for the neediest at the least burden to the taxpayer. She reflected
that there is a $21,000 discrepancy between the $81,000 in federal
:' f~de received by Collier County and the $60,000 savings to be enjoyed
?b~ the County by the transference of the two positions.
In answer to Ms. Bareh questioning the payment of costs, County
Manager Dorrlll confirmed that the Sect/on 8 program is administered
through the current offices adjacent: to the Development Service Center
:i~and that all or a portion of the costs are paid through Section 8,
with a certain amount of the administrative and overhead costs to be
:titansletted to the Housing Authority for rent, allocated costs for
electricity, Janitorial services, etc. He concluded that these are
part of the details needing to be worked out between the County and
'the Housing Authority between now and October let.
::' ' Me. Bareh expressed her feeling that the agreement between the
· ~:.~ollnt-F and the Housing Authority should be in place.
In response to Ms. Barsh, Commissioner Volpe stated that an
,t is being made to put in place a framework to address issues
details identified by those present today as well as staff. He
32
Page 13
August 2?, 1991
that should it get to the point where an Interlocal Agreement
not be worked out or becomes more cumbersome and expensive without
'~cco~pllshing the objective, It is time to "go back to the drawing
but for now there is a need to start some place
Dick Losbar, speaking for Taxpayer Action Group of Collier County
(TAG), stated that TAG supports housing assistance for low Income
"/fal~ilies and the position of CURE (Collier United for Rights and
[i.~q~lmltty). He voiced objection to the perception being built that
-'"there is some sort of reduction In total cost, as the proposal
~involves a move from personnel in the County to personnel in the
,Housing Authority. He questioned whether the County will retain any
'liability in connection with the rental assistance and, if
suggested this might not be a wise move.
County Manager Dorrtll reiterated that he is proposing that the
transfer be complete.
In response to Co~u~lsstoner Volpe questioning the potential tml~act
on block Rants enjoyed by the County, County Manager Dotrill stated
/that he ta not proposing any change regarding the grants at all. He
.,reflected that the Development Block Grant Program is a totally
separate progritm which has benefited the County considerably.
Commissioner Shanahan stated that it is very clear that the County
not retain liability. He reiterated that the whole idea is to
the process and accomplish the goals and objectives of
ifSgetting to tho~e most In need.
John J. Keschl voiced support for the proposed changes and for
:dable housing, citing that many Collier County employees cannot
afford local rent levels without maintaining two Jobs. He commented
:~C~ the number of evictions from the Collier County ~oustng Authority.
~ed Thomas, representing the Collier County Housing Authority,
i~l~?inted out that the proposed changes do not constitute a major prece-
!0:~dent. He reflected that the City of Naples was originally the one
th the Section 8 program, and that the County took the program over.
?;He. estimated that no less than 90~ of the Section 8 agencies in the
Page 14
August 2?, 199!
of Florida as well as the country are being administered by
Public Housing Authorities. He agreed that there can be an Interlocal
Agreement in place by October 1st, but added that an Assumption
! ill'Agreement, approved by HUD, must first be prepared and signed by both
the Housing Authority and the County. He reported that the Section 8
Program is a stand alone program designed to totally fund itself. He
~eflected that there will be no liability to anyone but the agency
i-~.~which As administering the program. He confirmed that the Collier
-"',' County Housing Authority also agreed to enter into an agreement with
another developer who is trying to provide affordable housing, and
:which will result in a major presence in coastal Collier County as it
'-',.r0/ates to private-public partnerships.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Thomas explained that there
wall be a central office which operates not only the Section 8 Program
. ~' but supervises the activities of the various Resident Managers.
In response to Commisf~toner Shanaham, Mr. Thomas stated that the
:.Collier County Housing Aul:hority has not been approved by HUD as they
· .have not previously appliE~d for approval. He added, however, that
'", 'Anfor~ation has now been ~]ubmitted to secure HUD approval. He con-
~..cttrred that an Inter/scsi Agreement establishing parameters can be in
/ lace b October
,..' In reply to Commissioner Volpe Mr Thomas predicted that the
Illterlocal Agreement can contain language addressing the allocation
process which will secure approval from HUD.
iii: Housing and Urban Improvement Director Shreeve reflected that
,., basically the allocation has worked out. He stated HUD regulations
mandate that persons must be given units in the order that their names
appear on the waiting list. He suggested it will be i/legal or
-(;~:.against regulations for the Interlocal Agreement to designate a per-
for specific area~.
'~' In re~ponse to Commies:loner Goodnight, Mr. Thomas reflected that
ii. the key to taking over the. program ie to take over the key person
which is presently administering ~the program.
Aug~tst 27, 1991
moved.. seconded by Commissioner Hames ~nd
to t~ Collier C~ty Ho~tng iuthort~ ~
John Witchget, Chairman of the Collier County Homeless Advisory
Co~ittee, stated his purpose is to present the Homeless Plan and
return in two weeks to allow the Board time to study the recommen-
dations and propose changes for final approval. He said the two docu-
ments before the Board consist of the plan and the implementation
schedule. He noted the l)lan has five parts, the first of which deals
i wtth coordination of services. He said there are 15 private agencies
ee~vtng the home/ess and the Committee is asking the County to become
the leader in coordinating services and instituting a comprehensive
case management plan for homeless people. He noted the plan also
'~'!i]req~ests the County take a leadership role in developing a coalition
of agencies working together. He reported the second part of the plan
with housing on an emergency basis, followed by transitional
:!housing and affordable hc. ustng. He stated the remaining portions deal
~k'with health care, employgent and transportation services. He
.~:'~oncluded the rationale of the Plan for the Homeless is to provide
/e~hanced coordination to bring people out of a homeless state, save
for the Cotmty and make the coremunity a safer place to live.
"' In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Witchget agreed that the
~'i~i~.'Committee ie suggesting the County~s Social Services agency be the
entity, however, tt is also possible for the Board to
:;;: "" Page 16
August 27 1991
.{~'esignate i.e., St. Matthew's House or the Salvation Army as the lead
~,~< agency.
<;i~-. Commissioner Volpe suggested this subject be addressed in a
~orkahop for the Board to get a better appreciation of the problems.
~Y. '>He said he is uncomfortable with signing on to a plan that commits
reeources when it Is unknown to what extent the needs of the homeless
are not being currently met. He commended the Committee for their
hard work and said he recognizes there are those in the community who
· ;late committed to making the Board and the community aware of the
problemm.
Mr. Wttchger stated he is asking the Board to accept the written
?L,;'plan, study it and return with recommendations and concerns.
,;~ Martha Skinner, Social Services Director, communicated she has
Worked with this Committt:e for the past nine months. She said they
have worked very hard to find a solution to every problem, however,
,-~ "~ solutions cost money. She stated the case management duties outlined
;will require an agency to work full time to bring about the results
'i requested. She advised if the County's Social Services Department
.~"'takes on the responsibility for coordination of services, she would be
required to double her c~trrent staff. She added she is unaware of
private agency in th~ County who would have the capability of
handling the duties involved. She stated the plan is a good one,
~'i. however some of the datel~ for Implementation are unrealistic and there
/'-' Is no way to put the pla~ Into effect without costing the County
money. She concluded to workshop this plan and receive all the
;";" l~eceesar~ Input, the Boa~.d will need at least two months to respond.
": Dr. Jane Polkowskt, !~bltc Health Unit Director, stated her
..department a~Teem with tile importance of having a plan to address the
issue. She reported the Public Health Unit currently sees a
':~.rnl~,l~r of the homeless, however, because of limited resources, they
;J:!:.h~ve had to prioritize tile types of patients they see. She said this
¥' results in many people going without care, waiting until they are sick
38
Page 17
' ~er~ugh to be hospitaliz,:d or utilizing the emergency room for general
,~,outpatient care service~3 which adds to the overall health care costs
the comsunity. She indicated her concern with the part of the plan
tha~ a~ks ~he Health Depar~men~ to do more because of ~he limited
resources available.
Cliff Green stated he tsa homeless person. He proposed a concept
ii, called New Horizons Camp which would require no funding from the
· Count¥o He said the ca~p would be a focal point for agencies to
i?:'gather the information ~he¥ need and it would also be employment
"' :oriented. He indicated the camp would have a labor office to keep
:'! .records of people and their Job skills and would provide a structured
fro~ the levul of a homeless person. He asked the Board to
-' consider designating la~d for the camp and providing him with a writ-
ten agreement to enable him to approach the private sector for dona--
tAons of building materials.
· ' County Manager Dorrill commented that Mr. Green has provided him
i"~Ath a well prepared tel,oft on his concept for the New Horizons Camp.
i'Ve said he is also attempting to establish a labor pool so that par-
?~ t~c~pants in the labor ~.ool will keep a higher amoun~ of their daily
eal-nings as opposed to roughly half the money going to the labor pool
bus~ness. He mentioned, however, it will not be easy to convince the
!(co~nity to find a reas~onably located site for the homeless camp.
~,:!.~11 Com~issioner Shanahs,n suggested the Board review Mr. Green~s pro-
posal along with the Ho~.eless Plan ~resented by the Committee. He
~.: cautioned there will be considerable resistance to the camp approach
(,:".on public property, but if the homeless want to help themselves, the
,Board will find a way tc. assist.
¢c~a~oner Shanah~n ~ved, seconded by Cout~sio~r ~o~e ~d
~. ~l~ 4/0, ~o ~c~t for c~dera~on the Ho~leoo PI~ for Collier
:~t~ f~ t~ ~la~l ~vlsor~ Cc~--tttee, for The ~d to
~~ ~1--11, ~0]~ ~ OF ~-~SE ~S~IA~5, INC.,
37
Page
Augu8~ 27, 1991
csunz sirr oy WnmSTAR or
mm - /lo/91
Legal notice hav~ng been published ~n the Naples Daily News on
Au~st 11, ~991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication f~led wfth
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition SMP-91-11,
f~led by Geoffrey ~rse of Evers-~rse Associates, Inc., representing
W~11t~ Klo~, re~es~ing Subdivision Master Plan approval for Hidden
Pointe.
F:ank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator, pre-
:~.,sented Petition SMP-91-11, requesting Subdivision Master Plan approval
~.i,::for Hidden Pointe, containing 21 single family lots and 15 apartment
i:iunits in two separate and existing buildings, for a total of 36 units
~-".. on 19.6 acres or a density of 1 8 dwelling units per acre. He stat,~d
i , Staff has reviewed the proposal fox' conformance with the Growth
.:'!!..Management Plan. He reported the property is presently zoned RMF-6,
, It will be dev,~loped as single family housing at the RSF-3
.ideneIty. He added it is currently going through the zoning re-
i: evaluation process. He advised surrounding land uses are compatib~e
!' with the proposed project. He said the project will have an entry
· gate and a secondary access through the Windstar PUD. He mentioned
~; concerns with the project by an adjacent homeowner are with traffic
-that will be generated for the development along with the traffic
"~ .already in existence associated with the Circle K at the entrance to
the street He reported the neighbor states children have been
.,i, injured on this street suggesting the possibility for a sidewalk to be
,~in~tallsd. He noted th,~ concerns for a sidewalk have not been brought
!'! to the attention of County Transportation or Development Services
Staff prior to this subdivision coming before the Board.
Co~tssloner Hasse commente~ there are many children in the neigh-
~i~iborhood and the addition of a sidewalk the entire length of Lakeview
'iDl~ive wou~d enhance thins project.
':' Mr. B~utt concurred, however, two considerations Staff looked at
· ';i;Wers ~) the Windstar project would not be allowed to use this road
Page 19
August 27, 1991
entrance of any con:struction traffic; and 2) the question of
of this project vs the benefit of the entire neighboring com-
to a sidewalk. He said upon consultation with Transportation
'Services Administrator Archibald, the cost to the developer for the
"%.aidewalk would approximate $8,000. He concluded the CCPC has racom-
approval of the project in light of the density being reduced
tb 1.8 dwelling units p(~r acre.
In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Brutt stated the
sidewalk issue did not come up for discussion before the CCPC.
He
the letter from David Woodworth with those concerns was not
,aceired until August 23rd.
~ii?J ~}.' Commissioner Shanaban remarked in his view it is essential to con-
eider a sidewalk in the development of the project, and $8,000 ts not
a large ~ount to provide safety for the area.
Jeff Purse, representing the petitioner, communicated the sidewalk
"iSsue was brought to htt~ attention the previous afternoon through a
phone call from a concerned citizen. He said he has not had time to
consider the ramifications of a sidewalk the entire length of Lakeview
Drive. He pointed out this project has an existing 15 units and the
~.addlttonal 21 single family units will occur over a period of five
~years which will not create an immediate Impact. He remarked the
~i'addltion of a sidewalk will not keep children off the road He stated
this project should not bear the full brunt of the sidewalk, however,
!~Lj~a~reed to contribute a fair share along with the neighborhood. He
i!i.!i'aeked that this petition be continued until he is prepared to address
sidewalk issue.
Condition, st ~hanah~n ~ovs~, ~econded by Co~miseioner Rases to
co~tim~ Petition ~MP-91-11 until 9/10/91.
· David Woodworth indicated his main concern is the safety of the
children in the neighborhood. He said the least the developer can do
commit tO $8,000 for the installation of a sidewalk. He also
a~vteed of his concern ~,tth the notification process of proposed dave-
y/opmenta.
the question, the motion carried 4/0.
Page 20
August 27, 1991
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
August 11, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed w/th
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition CCSL-91-5,
flied by Jerry Neal, Collier County Office of Capital Projects, repre-
senting the Board of County Commissioners, requesting a coastal
.?
construction sea:back line variance in order to dredge the Wiggins Pass
Inlet and deposit the d~'edged sand on the beach north of the pass
?inlet.
:':~ Barbara Primoski, Environmental Specialist with Project Review
, presented Petit/on CCSL-91-5 requesting a a coastal
construction setback line variance to dredge Wiggins Pass and dispose
of the material on the beach to the north of the pass. She said the
' '~vartance requested for the dredginG ranges from 700-1,800 feet seaward
?'of the coastal construction setback line and the disposal of dredge
~:~aterial will range from 500-600 feet waterward of the coastal
construction setback line. She advised the pass was previously main-
,.: .tenants dredged in 1984 and again as of this year. She said the total
volume of dredged material is expected to be approximately 46,800
i:i:.c~bi¢ yards which will be placed in an area approximately 2,200 by 100
~:;:feet north of the pass which will allow it to extend beyond the
emerging shoal that exists there. She reported dredging and filling
activities will occur only between November let and April let as a
Feemalt of the concerns of citizens and the Florida Game and Fresh
ifNater Fish Commission that these activities in the past have
'ed the spawning; and nesting times of protected species in the
. area. She added the Department of Natural Resources is requiring
monitor/ng of wa~er quality and turbidity and Staff is stipu-
that a cop~ of th~ moniforing reports be submitted to Collier
Page 21
,~ ~ August 2?, 199!
)~in%'~ Review Se~iceo aft well.
"~ In rerpon~e to Comn~fisioner Vo~pe, Ms. Pr~osk~ sa~d Coastal
ineer~ng has advised the sand drift changes depending on climactic
cond~tions ~d presently, the sand is being deposited to the north
because the ~ve action ls comin~ from the south.
Jer~ Neal w~th the Office of Capital Projects, cohented the
State Park ha~ documented the possible formation of a reef approxima-
~te~y 200 feet out from the shore line. He said ~hrough the permitt~ng
process, ~t was reco~ended to locate the deposit to the north in
order to keep the sand f)~om impacting on the natural starting of th,~
..:reef which is to the sou~h.
~'.' Tom Oilill, Aseistan~ to the County Manager, suggested elSmtnating
..~'~]':':~he landaus In the stip~llation regarding placing the sand to the
north since that will be a permit requirement, on the hope that ~he
may work out something with the permitting a~enctes to allow it
be placed to the south.
Co~se~oner Volpe ~lestioned If the balance of funds for this
ect w$~1 be appropriated from the surety for the prior contractor
'or from tourist development t~ee?
Mr. Oll~ff s~ated the County has applied for funds from the
Tourist Development Co~ittee and Is proceeding through the surety.
'~Conee~ as well.
Mr. Nea~ advised he has been in contact with the surety company
over the ~st two to three months and continues to be told the report
from the sure~y~s consulair wil~ be forwarded as soon as it is
(completed.
In~e Jo~stone, a Director of the W~ggins Pass Conservancy, com-
?' ~nted the C~nty and the Conservancy have worked hard and in close
· . coo~rat~on to brin~ the W~ins Pass maintenance dredging to
.. f~t~on. W~th re~ard to the s~d deposit, he said it was ~enerally
~ dec~ded that it should b~ deposited to the north because the general
. 'd~ft ~n that area at th~s period In history has been to the north.
000.
Page 22
Au~st 27, 1991
~oted &fret the aborted dredge last year, filling has been seen
from the south to the north. He indicated the Conservancy has
utnvemted $35,000 over the, last three years in engineering studies,
permits, etc., and $105,800 remains in escrow to pay the balance o~
thetr ehare of the dredging costs. He urged the Board of County
~?Co~ateetoners to move forward on tats important project.
caz~te4 4/0, to clo~e th~ public h~artng.
~1~ Volpe moved, eeconded by Commiestoner Shanahun and
~ ~ t~ N~. Olltff, thereby adopting Resolution 91-533.
Page 23
~' ' August 27, 1991
, eel .BocaBoost= :1=~ ~,#, - 1~: 2:00 P,M, at ~tch
-t~ ~ Clerk ~rt~l r~laced ~ty Clerk ~in see
Xte~ d~rA1
· ~OE~T~ 01-534, !t~ FLTXTXON V-91-13, DOCTORS STEPH~N pAGW AND
~ BO~, ~QU~TXNG A 36 FOOT VARXANCK FROM TH~ R~UXRED 50 FOOT
SID~ Y~ ~ TO I4 FE~T TO ALLO~ C01~TRUCTION OF A 1,240~_ S(~UAR~
xrr rrio TO AW ore cz, r. OCArXD AT 49 S C ST .O
- STr TXO
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
Augtlst ll, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-91-13
filed by Steven A. Bee, DMD and Stephen B. Page, DMD, requesting a 36
~; fOOt variance from the required side yard setback of 50 feet to 14
; feet in a C-1 Zone for property located at 4953 Castells Drive.
Community Development Services Administrator Brutt advised that
i.; the petitioners are req~lesttng the said variance in order to construct
· a 1,240± square foot addition connecting the two western most medical
office buildings which are part of an existing complex of four
,:separate buildings. He indicated on a display chart the diagram of
the four buildings and where the proposed building would be located.
He explained that the ~Atldtng addition would be adjacent to an alley
~i:at the rear of the neighboring property and would not impact other
!!:"adjacent properties, and he related that there is adequate
'parking available for this addition. He added that there will be four
~,; - .trees removed and relocated elsewhere. He pointed out that the CCPC
recommended approval of this petition.
Commissioner Volpe questioned if the proposed variance was an
i~expansion of a non-conforming use.
County Attorney Cuyler responded that since the use is authorized,
!71j all that is needed is the approval of the variance.
~.;', Carol LeBeau, Business Manager for the petitioners, advised that
!'the building addition would be for additional needed office space,
noting that there will not be an increase of patlent flow.
Mr. Brutt confirmed that there was one letter of opposition;
however, after a site visit, can find no basis for an objection.
Page 24
· ,~ . August 27, 199!
~/i:': In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. LeBeau explained that the
own the one building they are currently in, are under
:]:"'contract to purchase the building across the court yard from them, and
the property to be used to construct the connecting building is pre-
~:,. ~sently common area which is being conveyed to the petitioners through
::!' & contract with the oth~r owners of the complex.
~'~ Ms. LeBeau affirmed that the petitioners are in agreement with
~.'!'stsffts stipulation regarding the relocation of all trees and ornamen-
ta! landscaping within the proposed building envelope.
Ce~imt~ew Volpe mc.r~d, mc~nded by Commissioner Ha~e and
4/0, that the publLc hea~ln~ be closed.
~ee~ner Volpe ~c~d, ~econded by Coantsstoner Shanahen and
that !%t~tt~ V-91-15 be &ppr~ved, ~ubJect to staff"s
sttp~/stton, ths~by ~topti~g ,~esolutton 91-534.
Page 25
August 27, 1991
J~O~'t~OII 91--8.38, lt~ PrfZTZON V-91-11, GIORGK RZ~ 0F ~LLZ~ C.
~Y ~ ~XA~, ~~Z~G ~Y BUZLDZNG CO~TZON,
~ A 2.5 ~ ~-~-FA~ V~Z~CK ~ ~ ~QUZ~D 25
~ ~ ~ ~CX ~ 22.5 ~ IN A ~D ZOO, ~R ~0~
D~~ ~ P~ 0F L~ 12, BL~K "3", ~OY~ ~OD GOLF ~ CO~
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
Augtlat ll, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
'.'i the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-91-11
f/led by George R. Richmond of William C. McAnly and Associates, P.A.,
representing Barclay Building Corporation, requesting a 2.5 foot
variance from the required front yard setback of 25 feet to 22.50
· feet in a PUD Zone for property described as Lot 12, Block "J", Royal
:~.Wood Golf & Country Club, Unit One.
Community Development Services Administrator Brutt explained that
the 2.5 foot encroachment was a result of the survey stakes being
removed during the site preparation. He advised that the survey sta-
~ kes were replaced by non-survey personnel, using the reference monu-
~ merits rather than the property boundary markers which were located on
the opposite side of an existing masonry buffer wall which accounts
for the 2.5 foot discrepancy in the setback. He noted that the
building is constructed and staff has received a letter of objection
from adjacent property owners as noted in the executive s,!~mary
packet. He reported that the CCPC recommended denial of the said
petition with no fault attributed to the surveyor for the building
;: encroachment.
In response to Commissioner Hasse, County Attorney Cuyler informed
'that the. reason the building was completed before the error was dtsco-
~r~ ts ~cause the spot survey in the file
Jack Brugger, attorney for the Barclay Building Corporation,
,concurred that the spot survey indicated that the building was within
the 25 foot setback requirement and, therefore, the house was
'Co~leted and given a Certificate of Occupancy. He explained that the
August 2?, 199!
~1ortgage lender for the buyer required a survey be completed and it
at this tame that it was discovered that the setback was at 22.5
feet which meant the title insurance would not Insure the buyer. He
commented that It is unknown when the error occurred, and added that
:.,. this ks the first error of this type to occur within this development.
He pointed out that the petitioner receives no benefit from this
error
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brugger noted that It is
not a matter of removing something from the architect of the house
because the encroachment is the whole front of the house. He alleged
that Af at the time of the spot survey it had been noted that there
]!..'was a'2.5 foot encroachment, the developer would have corrected it at
that time.
I~tght Nadeau, representing the petitioner, Indicated on a
'~.:dlmpls¥ map where three of the objecting homeowners live In rela-
· ~:~ .
tionshtp to the subject property. He pointed out that the property to
the east of the property In question is vacant.
Mr. Brugger emphasized that by granting this variance in no way
would it be setting a precedence as was a concern of the adjacent pro-
party o~ners.
.?':. Ommmtmton~ Volp~ moved, seconded by Commissioner ~ ~nd
~lg I/O, that th~ public heelrig be closed.
O~mmt#t~ ~ moved, secoatilt by ¢o--iaatonar Hesse and
carrAM 4/0, t)mt Petition V-91-11 be approved, thereby m~opting
Page 27
August 27, 1991
~ ~O ~ ~ 26.05 ~ IN 0~ ~ OBTAIN A CKRTIFIC&~ OF
~~ ~ A ~Y C~~ HOUSK LOCA~D &T 2584 55~ ~CK,
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
August 11, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition V-91-12
ftled byPaul and Donna Listenberger requesting a 3.95 foot variance
' fPom the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 26.05 feet in a
RSF-3 zone for property further described as Lot 1, Block 181, Golden
Gate, Unit 6, Part 1.
· :~.. Community Development Services Administrator Brutt further
i]:;"deecrtbed the location of the subject petition as being on the
~..eoutheaet corner of 55th Terrace and 26th Place. He explained that
~.the spot survey showed the slab for the subject house to be poured
:four feet Into the front yard setback and the original permit was
denied and expired. He continued that the second permit was requested
· and received by the builder which also expired because of lack of
;.~:; activity, but after the third permit was received by the builder the
~/:house was completed. Mr. Brutt reported that inadequate tracking
facilities available at the time by staff is the only explanation as
tO how three permits were granted for the same house which was In
violation after the spot survey. He added, however, that the builder
~i!-knew that the first permit was denied because of the violation and
continued with the construction to complete the structure anyway. He
!', stated that staff and the CCPC recommends denial because of the said
iii{I knowledge by the bullder.
:i,~' Mr. Pollock, representing the petitioner, provided to the Board
!~;tnfolm~tton regarding the events of the three permits. He noted that
(the original permit was issued to a Mr. Eddie Lee Burkes on May 26,
i~/i 1988 ~uld was cancelled on January 10, 1989 because of lack of activity
on the pro,sot caused by the lack of funds. He related that the
"'.second permit was a~atn ls~ed to Mr. Burkes on December 19, 1989
000 57
August 27, 1991
not indicate any violation and again expired due to a lack
funds to continue the project. He explained that in April, 1991,
~'Mr. and Mrs. Listenberger agreed to purchase the house from Mr.
Burkes after speaking with the County Building Inspector regarding the
71.~.nspections that had failed regarding the house. He informed that Mr.
Burkes then obtained the third permit for the completion of the house;
.and when the request for the Certificate of Occupancy was sought, it
J:was pointed out that there was a front yard setback violation. Mr.
;:'Pollock related that the house is on a corner lot and because the
Zoning Ordinance treats a corner lot as having two front yard
ie the reason for the problem, as the front of the house is
within the required setback but the side of the house is not. He
~d that he has obtained letters of no objection from the neigh-
bore.
He noted that in the house is conformance with the Deed
for the entire Go/den Gate area. He provided to the
.Board pictures of the subject house (not provided for the record), and
Co~mented that this is not an unreasonable req~aest.
Mr. Listenberger stated that at the time he bought the house which
was fairlF complete, he did not know that it was in violation of a
i. front yard setback.
Commissioner Volpe suggested that the Contractors' Licensing Board
-:.,or the Code Enforcement Board look into matters such as these for the
future so these t~pes of variance are no longer required.
P. aMlm/ml~r Volpe ~ved, aeconded bit Coutaetoner Hu~ and
carTled i/O, t~mt Pwtttion V-91-12 t~ approved, thereby adopted
Page 29
· ,:, AugUst 27, 199!
FU-91-4, GARY YOUNG OF COLLZKR COUNTY SHKRIFF'S OFFICE,
PROV~S~CJNJLL USE =b' OF S;~X~ 8.~0 (KSS~l~ S~XCES) ~R
~~ YACILZTIKS IN ~SID~I~ ~S ~R ~ ~0PK~ L~ATED
ON ~ ~~~ ~ OF ~ I~SE~ION OF OIL ~LL ~K RO~
7~ A~ X.E. r ~ISTING OF 6.77+ A~S - CO~I~D TO 9/10/91
Community Development Services Administrator Brutt ~nformed that
the subject petition is to provide a multi-purpose training facility
to headquarter the shertff's firearms range, physical training, spe-
field operations training and other outdoor oriented training
programs. Mr. Brutt informed that a 20 foot high berm is proposed on
three sides of the facilities. He advised that letters of objection
have been received from adjacent property owners; and one received
[~'i:Aug~st 26, 1991, a copy of which he provided to Commissioner Goodnight
(not provided for the record), objected to the facility, however,
offered to sell his property to the County which the County's Real
)'::). Property Office is handling. He noted that the CCPC recommended
'!,approval of the petition.
In response to Commissioner Hasse, Gary Young, representing the
."!-Sheriff's Office, stated that the facility is located two blocks from
Immokalee Road which Mr. Brutt clarified as 1800 feet.
Commissioner Hasse commented that the area around the proposed
[i:1ocatton for this facility could eventually be developed; however, Mr.
pointed out that this location is at the extreme end of Golden
Estates.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Young explained that the
County has a contract to buy the property to the west of the proposed
which it already owns if the requested provisional use is
~.ig~ntad. He advised that the facility has been budgeted for in the
~!'1991-1992 budget.
Mr. Young defined the types of outdoor trainlng which are planned
the facility and added that in the future, classrooms and an
range are planned.
Commissioner Volpe questioned what the hours of operation were
Page 30
August 27, 199!
for the firing range? He also questioned whether an arrange-
could be made with Lea County to use their facility for training
tasting of parsonhal?
Deputy Tomltnson of the She. rtff's office commented that the Lee
,',.Co~znty facility is 36 miles from here making it impractical to use.
. Young added that the City of Naples uses the County's facility
for their training and testing.
Commiasioner Goodnight agreed that the hours of operations should
.~.
-i- ba regulated to eliminate firing after midnight to which Commissioner
~ Shanahah recommended the operations be limited to 11:00 P.M.
Mr. Young responded to Commissioner Hasse's question by informing
that the present firing range location in Collier County was always
intended to be a temporary site and the County's land fill is
requiring the space the Sheriff's office is occupying now.
Comissioner Volpe expressed his concern regarding the funding for
project. Mr. Young explained that alternative locations and
· sharad usea have been investigated and the result is that the
requested site serves the purpose best for the present and the future.
Commissioner Goodnight commented that it is her understanding that
! it ia the Board of County Commissioners' responsibility to provide a
firing range facility for the Sheriff's office and this is part of the
,,,raasontng behind using some of the GAC Trust Fund for it. She
irequested that this be verified.
~¢. In response to Commissioner Volpe's question regarding the
'iacq~ltsition of the property, Real Property Director Taylor informed
that the purchase of the additional land will cost $4,500 with closing
'.costa.
In rasponaa to Commissioner Haese, Mr. Young emphasized that the
cost of the facility is estimated at this time because more detailed
i~'i~nfo~tion would be needed to give exact figures which requires
ii~fllnd~ng that tha Sheriff's budget does not have presently.
Daputy Tomlinson pointed out that safety of the law enforcement
offi~ara is of the utmost priority and the training that is obtained
Page 31
August 27, 1991
a facility such as the one planned can go a long way In achieving
this goal.
:' Commisatoner Volpe concurred; however, he added that he would like
:to see the financing package for this facility.
Commissioner Shanahah suggested that this item be continued to
review the financial situation.
,;,' Mr. Chuck Stephan, a member of the Golden Gate Estates Citizens
Idylscry Committee, stated that first he is speaking on behalf of Mr.
!Dick Braun who does not object to the additional land betng provided
the GAC Trust Fund for the facility, but does object to spending
.$100,000 of the GAC Trust Fund for construction. He informed that in
~,surve¥1ng the residents living within sight of the proposed facility,
has found that there is no objection. He advised that four of the
i',f~ve Committee members have no objection to the facility being built
"'and approve of the $100,000 being provided for the initial construc-
tton costs as well as providing for the additional acreage required.
Commissioner Volpe reiterated that he would like to see a more
[Complete financial package regarding the construction of this fact-
??,'" ~m~ew ~ ~oved, ~onded by Commiestoner Sh~nahan and
· ;~C~'Fl~ 4/0, ~ ~tlnue Petitton PU-91-4 until September 10, 1991.
Community Development Services Administrator Brutt informed that
.the proposed resolution is a correction of a scrivener~s error. He
',explained that thts factltty is used to separate the recyclable items
the land fill.
C~0111~~ Vo1p~ ~t~d, ~e~o~ded by Commissioner Shm.n~sh~n and
91-857.
Page 32
August 27, 1991
':-A~ PAA'T~A&I~MENT PROVIDZNG FOR CONTROLLED ACCESS BETI~K!I C.R.
B&S,~&CJ~ISAIDTHEM!!~SPKRZJ~3 PINKS PROJECT VIATI~
~,l'V13JUSTOg..,ROAD ALI~lfiqKIFF - APPROVKDWITH STIPULATION
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained that the
~ubJect item is a three part agreement between Collier County, the
/i'. developer of the Palmetto Ridge project, and the developer of Imperial
"Go]f Estates. He commented that the agreement would provide use of a
portion of Piper Boulevard for construction access between C.R. 846
· and the Whispering Pines Project.
Mr. Archibald pointed out that this three party agreement is also
& compazlion item to the approval of the final plat of Palmetto Ridge
:~i'11 which include improvements to roadway, drainage, and water and sewer.
% Mr. Archibald informed that the concerns of both developers
involve limited hours for heavy truck use, limited hours and days of
the week, road maintenance/repair responsibility, and related traffic
:? County'a involvement is a result of the truck traffic having to cross
. County property. He explained that the details are listed in the
attached to the Executive Summary, which the developers
agreed to. He explained that the County Attorney's office will
only approve the agreement with the prior approval and execution of it
:. by the two developers. He emphasized that the proposed agreement will
'i. force other developing properties to find other means of access to
-. their property.
In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Archibald informed that the
County does not foresee expending any funds that are not already
.i:!'/ secured. He explained that the bonds and securities set forth in this
i.,i i agreement provide for the reconstruction of the road through funding
b~ the developer responsible for damaging the road, and the main-
tenants of the road will be the responsibility of the developers who
are using it. He added that Ordinance 82-9! provides another protec-
tion regarding permitting procedures.
Page 33
August 2?, 1991
Mr. Archibald re-emphasized that the proposed agreement only
~ developers being allowed to use PAper Boulevard which
~(-wtll require any other developer In this area such as the Sports Park
find alternative access.
Co~missioner Volpe expressed concern about limiting public access
to a ImlblIc road. Mr. Archibald acknowledged that Piper Boulevard is
a public roadway; however, the east end of Piper Boulevard, where It
connects to the Livingston Road corridor, has not been dedicated for
public use at this time.
Mr. Ktm Kobza, representing Domenico and Maria LaOrasta, informed
that the petitioners are in concurrence with the proposed agreement.
He indicated on the display map where Palmetto Ridge and Whispering
Pines are located and where the construction truck traffic has been
traveling by the subdivisions and across the right-of-way which is
i? proposed to be dedicated to Collier County.
Mr. Jack Pointer, representing Willoughby Acres, provided examples
where the County in the past has restricted truck traffic in the sub-
divisions of this area which worked in an agreeable manner. He
explained the history of how the proposed right-of-way to be dedicated
to the County came into ownership of Palmetto Ridge. He expressed his
concern regarding the approval of the subject agreement allowing only
,tWo developments still under construction the right to use Piper
-~Boulevard for their construction trucks. He pointed out that this
"Y'limItation of construction trucks could hazard the completion of
~tvingston Road which is to be a future access for Willoughby Acres
~d other subdivisions in this area.
~~Ao~m~ Vo~pe mf~od, seconded by Commissioner Sh~mahmn and
4/0, to ~ the AgreeBent between Whispering Pi~o, Inc.,
m 70
Page 34
AUgUSt 27, 1991
~ 91--880, KEt~KI)ZMG T!~ PIXAr, PLAT 0F "PJLLMEITO RZDGE' ~
~ - ~ ~ ~x~rxo~
Discussion on this item was provided in companion Item 9B1.
CommJm~Lo~m~Volpmmovmd, seconded b~CommissLoner Sh~nah~n and
C~TTted 4/0, tO ~ for recording the final plat of #Pml~tto
Ridgee alldgre~tprelimLnax~mcceptanca of the roadway, d~atnage,
~mtm~ mm~mmwm~ t~lqff~;~tm~tm, wub~ect to mtmff'm mtL~latAou, thmrm~
~~~lmt/~ gX-SS8.
Page 35
August 27, 199!
.:~']~r-~Z~l gl-63g, PROV'ZDXNG FOR THE TIt~SFER OF XMPROVEMEgTS WITHZN
TH~S.R, 9~1HX~!T-OF-NAY ~ COLLZER COUNTY TO THE FLORZD&
~~OPTRANNPORTATZON - ADOPTED NZT~ REVZSZONAND STZPULATZON
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained that
this item involves the disposal of two County acquired buildings
resulting from the S.R. 951 acquisition program. He informed that
staff has reviewed two alternatives, as outlined in the Executive
S~ary, for the removal of the buildings which include declaring the
· property surplus and attempting to sell/lease either or both buildings
"ior, alternate 2, turning the responsibility of the disposal of the
buildings over to FDOT The analysis staff arrived at, Mr. Archibald
noted, was that although there could be some cost advantage for the
County In removing the buildings themselves, the cost and risk out-
weighed the Justification; and, therefore, staff recommends adoption
of the proposed resolution providing for the transfer of the property
from Collier County to the Florida Department of Transportation. He
related that the County Attorney has advised that there is a revision
necessary in the proposed resolution.
In response To Commissioner Shanahah, Mr. Archibald proclaimed
that staff has reviewed the removal of the equipment In the buildings
in particular the coolers but did not find It feasible. He agreed
that further review will be made on this.
· C~Ttg4/O, ~lng Resolution 91-539, subject to the z~vtston by
~.:~ ~itt~'. Office ~ the r~t~ of the ~lue of r~t~
ooo. 87
Page 36
August 27, 1991
see Iloel~d 4~35 P.M. - Rocc~en~d: 4:35 at which
DIssty Clerk HofFman replaced Deputy Clerk Arright
Xtma ~OB4
RISOLUTXGSI 01-640, AUTHORZZI~G THE ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-MAY FOR
~OlJ OF ROAD, UTZLZTY AND DRAZNAGK ZMPRO~S TO AZRPORT
ROAD AT XJ ZRSBCTZOWS OP ISTEY AVZS BO EVA - ADOP E MXTH A
oT,-TO- oP 8o,ooo .,
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald advised that this
item iea request for the adoption of a resolution for the acquisition
of parcels of property at certain intersections as part of the Airport
Road corridor between Radio Road and U.S. 41. He affirmed that design
and permitting are nearing completion and improvements are being
'.i~. , wxrldertaken within the right-of-way that exists other than some corner
parcels for turning radius improvements at the intersections of
~'Airport Road and Estey Avenue and Airport Road and Davis Boulevard.
He pointed out that attempts are being made to acquire a fatrl¥ small
triangle at each location. He requested authorization to contact the
property ownerm and negotiate those purchases.
Commissioner Volpe cited that he has concerns with regard to the
~:if.~'..~iZe of the pa~'cels and the not-to-exceed figure of $425,000.
Mr. Archibald explained that there are eight locations to be
acquired and he is anticipating that the cost for each parcel will be
no ~reater than $10,000 each. He stated that staff will be bringing
back any negotiated agreement for the Board's consideration. He noted
that the $4250000 figure represents the purchase of some turn lanes.
~t~ Volpe moved, mecond~ b~ 0oulestoner Shanahen and
4/0, ~o iqpprov~ th~ acquisition of right-of-way, as requested
~ wt:~2~, ~ that F.~olutton 91-540 be ~dopted with · not-to-exceed
Page 37
August 2'7, 1991
Assistant Utilities Administrator Bloetscher reported that this
item involves two projects that have been designed and bid separately,
[i<~.however, staff and the engineers felt that there could be a cost
['~[aavlngs by allowing the opt/on for a contractor to bid the projects
itcgather and offer a deduct to the contract price.
Mr. Bloatschar advised that Mitchell & Stark Construct/on Company
the low bidder on each project and they have offered a 3~ discount
they awarded same.
Mr. Bloatschar stated that staff is recommending that Mitchell &
~:Stark be awarded both contracts and take advantage of the discount.
Mrs. Frances Barsch, representing TAG, questioned why the County
does not purchase the material for these pro3ects and take advantage
· of tax credits. Mr. Bloatschar explained that in the past, there have
been problems ~hen purchasing material in conjunction with a utility
.pro~ect relating to the liability of the pipe.
Finance Director Yonkosky reported that he has been advised that
~the County Attorney's office has strong concerns with regard to pipes
i.being stored at a utility project due to traffic or liability that the
,CountIf would be responsible for.
:?;~1~ 4/0, to ~c~t ~he rec~n~tton of staff ~d ~d the bid
~ ~1~ of ~th I~1~ Road Eu~ ~d C.R. 951 N~ter ~tn
~J~s to Ntt~11 I St~k Co~tnctt~ Co. tn the ~t of
A~tntstratlve Servtces Administrator Ochs stated that this item
.It a recouendatton to approve a work order under the annual contract
? ~. Page 38
August 27, 1991
~ architectural design services for a fire suppression system in
Building 'F". He noted that this item was originally presented to the
Commission in April, 1991, at which time direction was given to
ii.0110pend any ful'ther action pending revlew of the 30! Capital Budget at
budget workshops.
Mr. Ochs affirmed that the review is completed and the current 301
F~lnd Budget for this fiscal year contains an allocation of $180,000
~for this project. He revealed that staff ts recommending moving for-
'ward with the design services in the amount of $24,450.
Commissioner Volpe remarked that the County ls movlng into a new
J~budget year and this project is included in the current year's Non-CIE
';iElement. He suggested that because this will be the first year that
the Board wil! review the funding of the Non-tiE Elements that this
'project be prioritized with other pending projects.
Mr. Ochs announced that attempts have been made to correct the
.:'~ faulty system which ts currently in place to bring Building "F" up to
Giltrent codes, and noted that this is an important safety feature.
Emergency Services Administrator Reardon explained that any
~i.b~lilding, in excess of four stories, is required to have a sprinkler
~ ~yste~ installed. He indicated that it is unknown whether the current
::.ji.s~oke detection system actually works since there have been many false
sial'ms and part~ are not available for same. He stated that his
~ecoBulendat~on is that this is a priority item and to proceed with the
Project.
Co~isstoner Shanahah advised that Building "F" should be 100~
safe, noting that public safety is involved.
Wi~ VI~ I. Iat~tsh, ~chitect, for desist me,ices of a fire
Page 39
~ ~ Au~alat 27,
¥
!ij' ID ~1-2746 ~ TI~ PURCHASl OF FU~L TO VARIOUS VENDORS
Administrative Services Administrator 0chs stated that in order to
take advantage of volume discounts for the bulk purchases of fuel,
staffs from the City of Naples, School Board and the County recently
solicited prices for same. He reported that nine vendors participated
in the bid process and the lowest bidders for the various categories
are: Onyx Petroleum (Unleaded/Transport), Evans 0tl
(Unleaded/Tankwagon and Diesel/Tankwagon} and Mansfield Oil
(Diesel/Transport).
Mr. Ochs advised that it is anticipated that approximately $17,000
will be aaved in fuel purchases in next year's budget.
~ioo~r 82~nahan n~wd, macondad by Connieeisner H~ ~d
.... ~~ d/O, ~ ~ Bid ~1-1746 to the v~t~8 ~~ ~ rec~
01~41, ~X~ ~ PAY TX~S ~ ~X~ ~
A~n~stFa~ive Se=vi=es A~m~n~s~=a~o= Ouhs =e~es~eU ~ha~ seve=al
new pay titles and changes to two current pay tit/es relating to the
Fleet Management Department be authorized. He reported that these
'~oe~ttons are necessary for the table of organization needed to take
the County fleet repair and maintenance service in-house, effective
with the new fiscal year.
Commissioner Volpe questioned whether it is appropriate to approve
the positions as requested at this time prior to the final budget
hearing.
County Manager Dartill announced that the contract with the pri-
vendor requires a 60 day advanced notice of intent to terminate
the agreement and October 1st is the date of the annual contract. He
~'. mtated that in the unlikely event that the Commission determines at
~the budget hearings to remain with the current vendor, an extension to
agreement could be negotiated. He affirmed that it is antici-
Page 40
Auf~st 27, 1991
~ pared that there could be a cost savings of approximately $100,000 in
the first year if the County assumes the fleet maintenance respon-
sibility.
(~111i#t~ Ih~g~m ~t, #¢o~d !~ Commissioner !!~s# and
O~TI~[ 4/0, t~ ~ th~ rsco~m~atlon of etaff, and that
I~lmlUtim g1--~41 be a~optmf.
Page 41
August 27, 1991
N~Z,~~ZMG ~ !t~ ~ CR~ATZO# OF ~
Z'~,II~IkT~It~Z~I~JIJW~I~MT DZ~fRZCT ACCI~FT~D; AL'I*~I~TZV~
Office of Capital Projects Management Director Conracode requested
that the Commta~don accept the preliminary engineering study and hear
options pertaining to the creation of the Chokoloskee Island Water
Line Assessment District,
Mr. Conrecode stated that in December, 1989, the Board adopted
::,:Ordinance 89-88 creating the Chokoloskee Island Municipal Service
Taxing Unit for the purr~ose of providing funds for a feasibility study
for water improvements. He noted that the study has been completed by
Anchor Engineering Consultants. He Indicated that if the feasibility
is approved and the Commission desires to proceed with the project, an
,assess~ent district would need to be established in order to cover the
!.~[cost of the improvements.
!~". Conrecede explained that the proposed water source for this
project will be obtained from Everglades City and distribution linda
'consisting of 8" and 12" will run approximately 5.2 miles to
'Chokoloskee Island to service 545 properties.
Mr. Conracode divulged that the engineers offered three basic
alternatives as outlined In the Executive Summary. He advised that
staff ts recommending to proceed wtth Alternative "B" since It will
"';i~provlde potable water and minimum fire control for the benefiting pro-
owners. lie suggested that costs be determined by the assessed
% V~lue of the land.
Mr. Conracode requested that the Commission accept the Preliminary
Engineering Study based upon Implementing Alternative "B" and allow
· staff to perform a direct certified mall survey of the property owners
to obtain their preferences relative to the options and the costs,
noting that a public hearing will be held.
4/0, to ~pt th~ P~li~t~y ~n~in~ring Stm~/; appro~
end staff be di~t~ to con~ct a ~il ~urve¥.
Page 42
%'"' AUgUSt 27, 1991
"i~ ~"
. ~lg 4/0, t~t ~t ~tS 91-319/320; 91-323/325 ~ 91-327
APPOINTING WICRA~., GLZN~, GZL~S R. GOItAL, JO ANN
· IiI~O~LI. TURZELAIIDItlI~GARFT!~LL¥ TO TlrE HARCO ISLAND
!11~IC!IIlI!11[~1OO~Z~I~I'TADVISORYCONNITTEE - ADO~
Administrative Assistant to the Board Ftlson recalled that several
weeks ago, the Commission voted to re-establish the Marco Island Beach
· Renourtshment Advisory Committee. She advised that a press release
was issued and 16 resumes were received.
Mrs. Ftlson stated that 1/2 of the members of the committee are to
!~'be from single-family residences and 1/2 of the members are to be from
~s. Ftlson re~rked that she did not receive a reco~endatton
~['j from staff, h~ever notln~ that ~o~tsstoner Shanaban is reco~endtn9
the foll~tn~ appointments: Michael Gllme, ~tles H. Goral, Jo Ann
Vmrte, S. Buddy Harris, ~aren A. Ornowskt, Robert Atwood, Frank
Blochard, S~el N. ~rtel and Margaret Kelly.
Comtesloner Shanahan advised that his recommendation is a blend
of the foyer board and a group of new people to support the former
board. He noted that he has contacted the Marco Island civic groups
in order to reach a consensus of the membership.
?f.. OeeealMtm~e~ Shanahah ~vsd, secomted ~ Co~isstone~ Vol~ ~d
~.;
:: ~~ 4/0, ~o ~int the ntna ~r~ ~ recount, ~hlre~
91-542.
Page 43
August 27, 1991
TO AelJ~BB~FF TO SUBLEASI BKTWEKN THE DKPARTMKNT OF HIGHMAY
MOTOR VK~ICLBS AISD TH~ BOARD OF COU!FTY COJ~qlSSIOB'KRS OF
(X~IWTY, RI TOWER ~ROOO027, LOCATKD AT C~, TO TRAIUSFKR
Lieutenant Byron Tomlinson of the Shertff's Office, stated that on
;:~ i~ March 14, 1989, the Commission executed a lease agreement with the
Department of Highway Safety for the Highway Patrol Station at
',~. Carnestown. He advised that there is a 240t communication tower
[-~i~ilocated on the subject property which contains one of the Shertff's
'?min communication points for Southeastern Collier County.
Lieutenant Tomlinson announced that the Department of Highway
Safety and Motor Vehicles is requesting that the tower be leased, at
!' no cost, to the Collier County Commission. He noted that the County
Attorlley*8 Office has reviewed the agreement as to form and legal suf-
' ~ficien=y.
O~T~ l/O, tO ~to ~b ~ to ~~nt to Sublsm wtth tb
~t of HIW Safe~ ~ ~tor Vehicles.
Page 44
Auglist 2?, 199!
' '.;. ~oi~m os, coOwr!,...cmm~SsxuNmts* COtmen~XCATXOWS
County Manager Dorrill announced that the Shanahah Report is to be
· ?~.presented next 1seek. He questioned whether the Board desires that the
!sport be presented, as scheduled, or to delay same for an additional
at which time Commissioner Saunders will be back in town.
Commissioner Shanahah stated that Commissioner Saunders will be
back ~n town in two weeks and his Input is extremely important. He
· 11ggeeted that the report be presented in two weeks.
~ C~t~ i/O, t~t t~ follYtrig ltm~ ~dmr the c~mnt
Xtmm ~lW~I
~~ OF ~ FACXLXTIIS Ifi)R HARRXNGTON SOUND - WITH
The Flortd~ Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes
a letter authorizing the sewer system to be placed in ser-
vice.
s.e Pag.s 60 oi//& 7-S'-
~ ~ *~ ~ q~ P~, AT ~GO ~I= - ~
That the final plat not be recorded until the required impro-
vements have been constructed and accepted or until approved
security is received for the incompleted improvements and
that construction shall be completed within 36 months of the
date of this approval.
Authorize the Chairman to execute the Construction and
Maintenance Agreement.
That no building permits be Issued until the final plat Is
recorded.
Off-site drainage easement shall be recorded at the time of
plat recording. A draft cop%, shall be submitted prior to
approval of plat to record.
ag.. -
~1~ ~ to It~ 6C2
~111p~m~lto Xtmm
~T~AND ~FACXLXTX~ FOR EMERALD LiEnS, UNIT 3 -
The water and sewer facilities to serve the project cannot be
placed Into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be
Page 45
August 27, 1991
2e
te~ued until the Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation furnishes a letter author/zing the placement of
these eyerems into service, and;
Bacteriological testtng has met the County's requirements,
and;
The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been
satisfied, and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting
the fire hydrant(s} for ownership and maintenance.
See OR Book 1647
Pages 1892 - 1931
i~ ~A~ 01--~28, &UTNORXZING PReLImINARY ACCEPTANC~ OF THE ROADWAY,
I~I~,~IT~&NDSEWER IMP~OV~N~T~ FORTHE FINAL PLAT OF EMERALD
~ AT-~tl~I~T ~, U~IT THRE~ - NXTH ~TIPULATION~
Accept the maintenance bond as security for maintenance of
the infrastructure until the Board of County Commissioners
grants final acceptance of all improvements.
2e
Authorize the Chairman to execute the Resolution authorizing
preliminary acceptance.
Preliminary acceptance of improvements will not become effec-
tive until water and sewer facilities have been conveyed to
Collier County Water-Sewer District.
See Pages
Xtem~16B1
~Z~XO~910525, AUTHORIZING TH~ ACQUISITION OF PEP.w~TOAL ROAD,
UTTllrA~A~D~ E/L~B3~T~ B~ GIFT, PORCKASK OR COND~MNATZON FOR
~ TO CAR~ON ROAD AND~TCLOX STREET IN I~B~OEALRK
See Pages /~/"
Ite~ I)1.1~2 ~ to Item 9B4
o, ZDICAL Pnso n oo,.
PO~ ~BTINUATION GRANT OF OLD~ ~IC~8 A~ TX~E XII-B
XZX-D ~ IN ~ ~ OF $138,778 ~ ~ ~ AG~ ON
~ ~ ~l~, X~.; ~ A~ORI~TX~ ~R ~I~
See Pages
.!:'~B~ ~ TO T~ COUBTY'8 DXGXTAL !IETMORK - ANARDED TO TO NETWORK
AUgl~t 27° 199!
~I7DIIT MIIIIIIIT ~1' THE AJIXrIIT OF $3,000 TO TNCRBJLSX P~RSO]b_L 81RV'XGES
,(XITR]I~ W1TI.ORAL mear.1'H SKI~CKS 0F FLORIDA,
INC. FC)R DKMTAL
See Pages
~l~No, e~d ~o Item 9B4
IIHI FOBD 301 TO F0WD 00l FOR BUILDING IqAZHTKNA!ICE OVERTI~ - ZW THE .a_.mJURT OF ~19,620
. . ~ B~TWEKI COLLTL~ COUNTY AND THE STATK DKP'ARTMKHT OF
" . ArJ'~ zI TH~ AM0q:JMT OF 0825 FOR PLAN MAIIFI*KNANCK AND RADIOLOGICAL
'.' I~I'L&TI3) TRAIlrX~8 DURING FT' 91-92
- Xte~
TO TH~ =A~ FOR TZlq~ SHRIDDzNG ~KRVZCES= AS
Xtmm ~26H~
CaAIgl ~ TO DATE FOR THE PZWI R]:I:)GK IIqlDUSTRTAL PARE PRO.J-KCT AND
Item
August 27, 1991
gl"§$O, 8~'fl]~ ~fltlTT Kt~D~Ff TO N.,ORXDA ~ & LZ~Ff
~ No. 408 Dated 8/15/91
..',!. No. 120 Dated 8/14/91
~-~LI~ ~_~ ~T~ NO'S. 40a01r 43770 AND 60684
The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and/or
referred to the various departments as Indicated below:
l. Annual Financial Report of the Marco Island Fire Control
District for FY Ended September 30, 1990, from Gerald Lewis,
Comptroller of Florida, Bureau of Local Government Finance.
xc: Filed.
2o
Letter to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/13/91, from
Charles A. Schnepel, Chief, Miami Field Office, Department of
the A~ Corps of Engineers, re road improvements on the
Miller Boulevard Extension In the Southern Golden Gate
Estateu of Collier County. xc: Nell Dotrill, George
Archibald and filed.
Letter to Collier County, from Charles A. Schnepel, Chief,
Miami Field Office, Department of the Army Corps of
Engineers, re Wiggins Pass Marina Company, Inc. permit appli-
cation for restructuring their existing commercial marina
facllit~F. xc: Nell Dotrill, Frank Brutt, Harry Huber and
filed.
Letter dated 7/19/91 to Tank Owners, from Carol Nash,
Enviromaental Specialist III, Storage Tank Re~ulation Section
Department of Environmental Re~ulatton, requesting review of
registration codes. xc: Neil Dotrill, Bill Lorenz, Frank
Brutt ~%d flied.
Letter to BOC Chairman dated 8/O9/91, from Jon M. Iglehart,
Enviromaental Specialist, Department of Environmental
Re~lmtion, re Collier County - WRR, File *112007115. xc:
Nell Doanrill, Frank Bl-utt, Harry Huber and flied.
! B 000 , . 150,8
10.
August 27, 1991
Not,ca of Proposed Rule~king dated 8/9/91, from Florida
Department of Environmental Regulation. xc: Nail Dorri/1,
Frank Brutt, Bill Lorenz and filed.
Letter to Chairman from Jon M. Iglehart, Environmental
$pec~alist, Department of Environmental Regulation, re
Collier County - WRR, File ~11200466§. xc: Nail Dotrill,
Harry Huber and filed.
Letter dated 8/14/91 to Finance Director John Yonkoeky, from
Chief Wayne Martin, East Naples Fire Control and Rescue
District, w/updated bond information. xc: Filed.
F~nancial Statements w/Independent Auditor's Report Thereon,
Septemb,er 30, 1990 and 1989, for the Marco Island Fire
Control District, from Rogers, Wood, Hill, Starman &
Gustaeon. xc: Filed.
Marco Island Fire and Rescue District Independent Facility
Report dated February 21, 1991. xc: Filed.
11.
12.
Letter dated 8/13/91 to Chairman and Ken Cuyler, from Jeffrey
D. Frtdkin, Mershon, Sawyer, Johnston, Dunwoody & Cole, re
Notice of Claim Carter E. Bryan and Mollie S. Bryan v.
Collier County. xc: Neil Dotrill, Mike Arnold and filed.
Minutes Received and Filed:
Golden Gate Parkway Beauttfication Advisory Committee
agenda of 8/14/91 and minutes of 7/9/91.
13.
Be
Collier County Fire Consolidation Study Group, East
Naples Fire & Rescue District agenda and minutes of July
11, 1991.
Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board minutes of
August 12, 1991.
CC of Notice to Owner/Surety dated 8/07/9! tO American
Bonding Co., from Thompson Pump & Mfg. Co., Inc., advising
that they have furnished dewatering pumps/equipment for the
Pine Ridge Water Improvement Project, under an order given by
Cabana Construction Co. xc: Nail Dotrill, Steve Camell,
John Yonkosky and filed.
14.
15.
16.
Notice to Owner dated 8/12/91, to Collier County from Hertz
Equipment Rental, advising that they have furnished general
equipment rental for the Agricultural Center on Immokalee
Road, under an order given by Suppression Technologies. xc:
Nell Dotrill, Steve Carne/l, John Yonkosky and filed.
CC of Notice to Owner dated 8/09/91 to Collier County School
Board, from Mace Sod Service, Inc., advising that they have
furnished appro:¢imately 300,000 sf. of Bermuda Sod for the
Golden Gate Elelaentary School, under an order given by
Greenmaker of SN Florida, Inc. xc: Nell Dorr111, Steve
Carnell, John Yonkosky and filed.
Notice to Owner dated 8/2/91, to Collier County Board of
Co~ua~ssioners, from Vistawall Architectural Products,
advising that they have furnished 4-1/2" flush glaze aluminum
for the Collier County Library, under an order given by
Florida Glass & Aluminum. xc: Nell Dotrill, Steve Camell,
John Yonkosk~ and filed.
Memo dated 8/13/91 w/Camp Keasis Strand Water quality
Quarterly Progre~ss Report April through June, 1991, from G.
George Y~lmaz, Pollution Control Director. xc: Filed.
August 27, 199!
There being no further bustnees for the Good of the County, the
~meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 5:30
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS
CONTROL
{~{ m;l~ e roved by the Board on
::$.ao'~p oente 4//// or as corrected
000 , 152
Page 50