BCC Minutes 09/10/1991 R Naples, Florida, September 10, 1991
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
~r~d'fo~ the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
"Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
: have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSIO~ in Building
~i.:i "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
members present:
CHAIRMAN:
VICE-CHAIRMAN:
Patricia Anne Goodnight
Michael J. Volpe
Richard S. Shanahan
Max A. Hasse, Jr.
Burr L. Saunders
ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk, John Yonkosky, Finance
~D~'ector; Ell~e Hoffman, Debby Farris, Annette Guevin, and Wanda
:: Arr~;hi, Deputy Clerks; Neil Dotrill, County Manager; Jennifer Pike,
Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Ram]to
Manalich, Assistant County Attorney; George Archibald, Transportation
~.'~'~ Sez'v~ces Adm~nistrator; Frank Brutt, Community Development
.~Adm~n~strator; Martha Skinner, Acting Public Services Administrator;
Russell Shreeve, Housing and Urban Improvement Director; Jeff Perry,
MPO Coordinator; Ken Bag~[nski, Plannlng Services Manager; Robert Lord,
Bz'yan Mflk, Ron N~no and Sam Saadeh, Planners; Sue Ftlson,
i:~.iAdm~n~strat~ve Assistant to the Board; Gary Young and Lieutenant Byron
~.Toml~nson, Sher~ff's Office.
Page
September 10, 1991
APPROVED WITH CHANGES
Ommmtmio~r Shanahah moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and
CmXT~edlZ~mn~mou~ly, that the agenda and consent agenda be approved
with4~ follo~tn~ changes:
Item #9F1 - North Naples Emergency Services Complex request
to revise existing plans and solicit proposals for construc-
tion - Deleted. (Requested by Staff}.
Item #9F2 - Participation in the Marco Island Fire and Rescue
District's new Fire Station - Deleted. (Requested by Staff).
5.
6.
7.
Item #16A6 - Approval of an Agreement between Collier County
and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC)
regarding the local matching funds for the Transportation
Disadvantaged Planning Grant - Deleted. (Requested by
Staff).
Item #16C2 - Amendment to the Clam Pass Utility Engineering
Contract - Deleted. (Requested by Staff).
Item #16C3 - Change Order to the Consu]tlng Engineering
Services Agreement with Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc.
for construction management for Community Parks Phase II
Construction - Deleted. (Requested by Staff).
Item #16A5 Moved to 9A1 - Approval of Bicycle/Pedestrian
Coordinator Grant Application.
Item #16E2 Moved to gel - Recommendation to authorize
purchase of advertising with the Naples Daily News.
(Requested by Staff).
Item #6B1 - Petition R-91-2, Gary Butler of Butler
Engineering, Inc., representing Ericksen Communities, Inc.,
requesting a rezone from A-2 to RSF-4 for single-family resi-
dential for property located on the north side of 111th
Avenue North - Continued (No Date). (Requested by
Petitioner).
Item #6C4 - Companion to Item #6B1 - Continued. (Requested
by Petitioner).
Item #7B1 - Petition PU-91-3, Mark Lamoureux representing
Florida Cellular RSA, Ltd. Par., requesting a Provisional Use
'B' of Section 8.10 of the E-Estates Zoning District to
allow a communication tower for property located 8.5 miles
east of 1-75 - Continued to 9/17/91. (Requested by
Petitioner).
11.
12.
13.
Item #6B2 - PUD-89-1(1), Bill Hoover of Butler Engineering,
Inc., representing Rockwell Gust, J.R. Properties, requesting
an amendment to the Pelican Lake PUD and Master Plan - To be
heard first.
Item #9H1 - Approval of distribution and use of preliminary
official statement for the Series 1991 Water-Sewer District
Revenue Bond Issue - To be heard at 11:00 A.M.
Items #6C1 & #6C2 - re vacation public hearings - Collier
Health Park and Riverchase Shopping Center. There will be an
Page 2
September 10, 1991
associated replat on next week's agenda re these two vaca-
tions and the staff recommendations is revised to reflect
"Approved, subject to the replat of tho~e items scheduled for
next week."
14.
Item #10A - Issues affecting the composition and functions of
the Collier County Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board - To be
heard immediately following the first item.
~CONSENT AGENDA - APPROVED AND/OR ADOPTED
The motion for approval of the Consent Agenda is noted under Item
#3B
- APPROVED
The motion for approval of the Clerk's Report is noted under
'i.~i(' Item #1:1.
SERVICE AWARDS - PRESENTED
Commissioner Saunders presented services awards to the following
Gollier County employees:
Llduvino L. Blanco, Road & Bridge Dist 2 - 10 years
Sherry L. Domin~ck, L~brary -' 5 years
i.i<::<;PROCLANATZON DZSIGNATING SEPTEMBER 1§-21, 1991 AS INDUSTRY
W~ZE - ADOPTED
Upon reading of the proclamation, Commissioner Hasse moved,
seconded b~ Co~uaissioner Shanahan and carried unanimously that the
designating September 15-21, 1991, as Industry
,,,.~,iAppreciation Week be adopted.
"i'i, Mr. Tom Gatlick of the Economic Development Council accepted the
<.if'Proclamation and thanked the Commission for their support and par-
t~cipation. He advised that there will be a kick-off luncheon at the
Vineyards on September 18, 1991, to honor Collier County businesses
and inv~ted the Commission to attend.
Page 3
~B! - Continued
September 10, 1991
"P~TITION PUD-89-1(1), BILL HOOVER OF BUTLER ENGINEERING, INC.,
P. KPI%P~NTING ROCKWELL GUST, J.R. PROPERTIES, REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT
TO TH~ PELICAN LAKE/OSPREYS LANDING PUD DOCUMENT AND MASTER PLAN, FOR
PROPERTY LOGATED ON THE NORTR SIDE OF DAVIS BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY
1/3 MILE WEST OF COUNTY BARN ROAD - DENIED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
August 8, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition PUD-89-1(1),
filed by Butler Engineering, Inc., representing Rockwell Gust of J.R.
Properties, on behalf of 3aywell Company, requesting an amendment to
the Pelican Lake PUD Document and Master Plan for the property located
on the north side of Davis Boulevard, approximately 1/3 mile west of
~'iCounty Barn Road.
Planner Saadeh advised that the petitioner is proposing a change
in the name of the Pelican Lake PUD to Ospreys Landing and a change
· to the development scheme to allow 176 affordable rental units in lieu
of the current approved plan which provides for 80 conventional multi-
family units. He noted that the proposed project is surrounded by
Moon Lake PUD to the north and west, Crown Pointe East PUD to the
south and across Davis Boulevard, and A-2 property to the east which
{i': is undeveloped.
Mr. Saadeh stated that pursuant to the Affordable Housing
Ordinance, the petitioner is allowed up to 11 units per acre, and
noted that the proposed PUD amendment is for 8.86 units.
Mr. Saadeh explained that during review of fezone petitions, the
ii.. 'following crtterta are reviewed and applied: consistency with the
· Growth Management Plan which provides for the granting of density bon-
uses anywhere in the urban residential district; adequacy of
infrastructure and community services; and compatibility with rela-
tionshtp to residential, industrial and commercial.
Mr. Saadeh reported that within a one mile radius of the proposed
.pro3ect, there is Kings Lake, Foxfire and Crown Pointe East. He noted
that aside from the subject pro3ect including rental and affordable
Page 4
September 10, 1991
~.i 'housing units, it is no different than other multi-family projects in
-!.i the general area. He remarked that the neighboring PUD's have higher
densities in their multi-family tracts, ranging from 10.7 units per
acre to 14.2 units per acre. He divulged that when looking at pro-
Jects with multi-family next to single family, it cannot be pro-
fessionally determined that there is a compatibility issue. He
indicated that this project will be no different than any other multi-
family development in the surrounding area.
Mr. Saadeh advised that the Collier County Planning Commission
reviewed this petition on August 1, 1991, and recommended approval of
t..~ '.same by a 5/1 vote.
Commissioner Volpe stated that he understood that the base density
of the pro3ect was 80 units provided there was an interconnect with
the Moon Lake PUD, otherwise the base density was to be 60 units. He
recalled a debate which took place a short time ago and thru some
inability to work out legal access the ordinance that was approved in
.!. December, 1989, was never filed with the Secretary of State's Office.
~i, He questioned whether there has been a resolution to the legal inter-
!ii~ connect issue with Moon Lake PUD.
· Planner Saadeh replied that when this petition was originally pre-
~i~.~ sented as Pelican Lakes it was proposed for 60 units and 80 units if
'the interconnect was provided. He explained that since this project
now deals with affordable housing, a bonus density of 8 units over and
above the 3 units is now allowed, and therefore, the interconnect
issue is resolved.
Commissioner Volpe pointed out that this project is in a traffic
· congested area along Davis Boulevard and the Policy has been to deduct
one unit per acre unless an interconnect is provided.
Mr. Saadeh replied that the Level of Service on Davis Boulevard is
'operating at LOS "D" and this pro3ect would not reduce the service
level. He noted that Davis Boulevard will be four-laned, thereby
increasing the LOS to "A"
Planning Services Manager Baginskt explained that areas of
Page
September 10, 1991
,ngestion were taken into consideration when determining the density.
remarked that this is an affordable housing project and based on
locat]gn, point system, etc., it is allowed to receive certain
bonuses and densities.
Housing; & Urban Improvement Director Shreeve advised that the sub-
~i.~Ject PUD calls for 176 units on 19.86 acres of land. He reported that
units per acre equals 50 units, notinG that there will be ll7 bonus
units on the property. He announced that the developer is proposing
to rent 18 units or 10.2% as one bedroom affordable units, 35 two
bedroom units or 19.9% and 18 three bedroom units or 10.24%.
Accordingly, he explained that a total of 6.! bonus units per acre
would be allowed.
Mr. Shreeve called attention to the developer's proposed rental
rates: 1 bedroom units $320-$432; 2 bedroom units $400-$542; and 3
bedrooms $470-$638. He indicated that utilizing the figure of 30% of
i'.{~income for rent and utilities, a family earning between $15,900 and
9,480 would be able to afford the one bedroom units; and the three
~? bedroom units would be affordable to family earning between
~.~ $22,400-$29,120. He related that these units would be for famtlies
~ii'~ working in the area considering that the median income is approxima-
~!?~ rely $24,000. He stated that families drawing Aid to Dependent
~/Ch~ldren pay a max/mum of $294 per month or $3,528 per year for
?~housinG.
In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Shreeve advised that if
developer sells the property, the affordable housing agreement
with the deed for a period of 15 years.
Commissioner Saunders questioned whether this project would revert
back to the original density if the developer is unable to construct
.the, affordable housing units due to the economy.
:?~.13<:.:' Community Development Services Administrator Brutt stated that the
ect would need to be resubmltted for reconsideration.
Commissioner Saunders suggested that if this petition is approved,
'staff should ask the developer if he would be willing to accept some
18
Page 6
;~,. September 10, 1991
:"?[~'t~.me frame relative to construction.
Commissioner Hasse volced concerns with regard to a sufficient
amount of parking. He remarked that many of the one bedroom units
will be occupied by two people who are both working and driving two
vehicles. He noted if 1.5 or 1.75 parking spaces are provided, there
will be a shortage of parking.
:. ~:Commissioner Volpe stated that a certain denslty bonus credit will
~be given which translates Into a certain number of dollars and then at
~.a later point in time, consideration may be given to waiving impact
fees. He remarked that he would like to see the entire package
brought together at the same time.
::. Commissioner Saunders explained that staff has done a good job in
~; : terms of advising the Commission that the real issue is whether nine
!' : units per acre is compatible with the area.
MPO Coordinator Perry addressed the Levels of Service on Davis
Boulevard. He advised that staff reports indicate that the LOS is "D"
as of 1991 peak season, however the LOS was actually "F" as of 1990.
He stated that the Level of Service, itself, has no bearing on the
density calculations relative to the number of units per acre that are
allowed or not allowed. He noted that Davis Boulevard is fully funded
and programmed for improvements in FY 93/94 by FDOT from Airport Road
to the CoulTty's portion of the four-laning which has recently been
completed.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Perry advised that projec-
, ttons from DOT are that within a 20 year time frame, Davis Boulevard
would need to be slx-laned out to Santa Barbara Boulevard, and four-
laned from Santa Barbara to CR-951.
Attorney Bruce Anderson, representing the petitioner, pointed out
that the PUD requires that the first building permits for infrastruc-
ture be pulled within a five year period and the first building per-
mits for the actual buildings are to be pulled within six years. He
reported that the developer does intend to develop this project.
Attorney Anderson affirmed that the proposed project is consistent
Page 7
September 10, 1991
with the Comp Plan. He called attention to Policy 1.5 of the Housing
i!'Element which provides the directlve: "By 1994, the total number
of housing units shall be increased to meet the housing needs of all
!:ii~' 'existing and anticipated populations of the County." He remarked that
~<an Affordable Housing Task Force was appointed to assess the housing
needs of low and middle income County residents and it was determined
that slightly less than 1,5OO new rental units are needed per year for
the next five years in order to meet the demand. He indicated that
the proposed project with 176 rental units represents slightly more
than a 104 step towards meeting that goal for this year. In addition,
he noted that Policy 1.4.1 of the Housing Element provides the direc-
tire that locations for affordable housing should be equitably distri-
buted, taking into consideration convenience, accessibility and
'availability of infrastructure. He cited that the development is con-
venient and accessible to a number of retail and service employers,
i.e. Collier County Government Complex, Development Services, Kings
Lake Shopping Center, Towne Center Shopping Center and Courthouse
Walk. He indicated that it is far better to have people live close to
where they work in order to reduce commuting time and to reduce traf-
fic congestion. He declared that staff indicates that there is ade-
quate infrastructure available to serve the development and the four-
laning of Davis Boulevard is underway and fully funded by the State.
He expressed that the requirements of the Housing Element are being
met and noted that an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement has
been signed, committing to set aside 40~ of the units for rental to
families with income ranges of $14,000 for one person to $32,000 for
four persons. He explained that the 40% of the units represents 71
apartments, and these will be mixed in with the market rate rental
i'.' .apartments and will have the same square footage and amenities as
those designated for the affordable.
Attorney Anderson stated that the developer will provide onsite
~i.'imanagement to ensure that no resident leaves his car parked up on
'concrete blocks. He indicated that the Affordable Housing Agreement
Page 8
:. ~ September 10, 1991
.:~!*~s binding for 1§ years. He suggested that the focus of this project
be the same as other success projects: River Reach Apartments,
Summerwind and Rookery Bay Apartments. He noted that these rental
developments have been good neighbors and contributed to the stability
of the community by providing a clean, decent, affordable place to
live for young working families who are trying to make ends meet
while gaining a start on the good life that everyone seeks in Collier
County.
In answer to Commissioner Shanahan, Attorney Anderson replied that
the developer has committed to right turn in and right turn out only,
· and sidewalks will be installed on Davis Boulevard.
Commissioner Hasse voiced concerns with regard to parking.
Mr. Bill Hoover of Butler Engineering, reported that the developer
will meet the County's parking requirements. He indicated that there
will be 1.75 paved parking spaces for the one bedroom units and 2.25
parking spaces for the three bedroom units.
- Mr Gary Butler advised that the site is comprised of 14 acres of
"11,:lake wetlands and recreation green space.
Commissioner Shanahan questioned whether the developer intends to
request impact fee waivers. Mr. Hoover replied that the developer
does not intend to ask for impact fee waivers. He explained that the
b developer is requesting 70~ of the allowed 8 dwelling units per acre
for the density bonus in addition to the three that he is already
entitled to, or a total of 8.86 dwelling units per acre. He affirmed
that staff is in receipt of numerous letters from the residents of
· Moon Lake citing the project is not compatible with the neighborhood,
i~however, staff's rezonlng findings indicate that the project is com-
patible with surrounding land uses, as depicted on the displayed den-
map.
Gommissioner Volpe related that he is focused on the question of
'density and how the compatibility issue can be achieved. He remarked
i~ithat the surrounding projects were developed under the old Growth
'Management Plan.
Page 9
September 10, 1991
Mr. Hoover replied that it makes sense to have an affordable
development in close proximity to where people are employed.
~' ~He noted that meetings have been held with representatives from the
'Moon Lake Development in order to improve the proposed project. He
reported that the controversial access onto Moon Lake Drive will be
eliminated and there will only be one access onto Davis Boulevard;
· building heights have been reduced from three stories to two stories;
· '~ibuildings will be set back approximately 90 feet from all perimeter
property boundaries; no buffering was previously required for this
project, however buffering will be provided between this project and
all surrounding projects. He presented photos for the record
demonstrating these findings.
The followinG persons spoke in opposition to the Pelican
Lake/Ospreys Landing project:
Mr. William Hawley
Mr. Jeffrey Lever
Ms. Diane Ocikowski
'~ Mr. Dick Sherman
Mr. George Keller
Mr. 3ames Ouellette w/petition
Ms. Jane Varner
Those persons speaking in opposition to the project cited the
following: The developer was previously restricted to 60 units unless
an Interconnect with Moon Lake was provided and a request is now being
made for 176 units without an interconnect; proposed density will
impact the neighborhood; proposed project is an unwarranted intrusion;
original plan of 80 units should be developed; proposed project will
affect the quality of life of surrounding developments; project will
further impact traffic on Davis Boulevard; this is an opportunity for
a greedy developer to make a quick buck; surrounding property values
will decrease; there are other locations along Davis Boulevard that
could suitably be used for this project; the proposed rental fees are
not affordable to the average wage earner in Collier County; an inven-
tory should be made with regard to the current number of available
"affordable housing units; the project will be comprised of heavy den-
stty; only 18 units will be rented for $320-$420 per month; and it is
difficult to realize there is a shortage in affordable housing units
Page 10
September 10, 1991
the local newspaper is currently full of rentals with entice-
The following persons spoke in favor of the proposed project:
Rev. Russell Mase
Mrs. Berrie Gulacsik
Mr. John Steinwand
Those persons speaking in favor of the proposed project cited the
~,?~ollowing: There are a large number of persons in the community, many
of which are professionals, requiring aid Jn order to pay their rent;
~i ~ affordable housin9 is needed in close proximity to employment; not
~all individuals in the moderate income category are able to purchase a
~home since they have limited resources available, therefore the only
alternative is rental housinG; the proposed project would not adver-
sely affect the neighborhood; Naples is the least affordable area in
Florida in which to live; and 30% of ColSier County Government
employees would qualify, wage wise, for occupancy at this project.
Commissioner Volpe questioned whether Attorney Anderson was
involved in prior discussions relative to the 60 units or 80 units
with an interconnection to Moon Lake. Attorney Anderson replied that
he was not involved with this project at that time, noting that that
~-~ should not be the issue today. He indicated that the subject access
/will be closed off and the developer is entitled to 11 units per acre.
Co~eeloner Volpe moved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and
cm~'r~e~ unanimously, to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Volpe reiterated concerns with regard to the density
of, the project and the highly congested traffic area on Davis
i,i/Boulevard. He pointed out that one of the speakers mentioned that
there seems to be many properties available for rent in the proposed
...price range and the real need appears to be for the very low income
....people.
Commissioner Goodnight recalled that the Commission previously
~voted to allow density bonuses for affordable housing regardless of
i %ransportation ~mpacts. She indicated that if the Board denies this
project, staff needs to be instructed to amend the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 11
September 10, 1991
She pointed that the Affordable Housing Report included a low income
~group and a moderate income group with two locations: Immokalee and
East Naples. She noted that the proposed project is part of the
Affordable Housing Task Force Plan of need for this type of affordable
housing. She remarked that she believes that the people that have to
live in these developments prefer to live with the normal stream of
'.people since their dream is to one day have a home of their own. She
advised that her goal is to have the Commission direct affordable
housing through the private industry, except for the low income which
will be subsidized through impact fees, linkage fees, etc.
Oommtsstoner Saunders explained that staff is following the ordi-
nances, adopted by the Commission. He noted that staff has concluded
that traffic, even though it is a consideration, is not the type of
issue on this particular project that would warrant denial of same.
He reported that one of the most difficult issues to deal with relates
to balancing the needs of certain segments of the community against
potential impacts on neighborhoods. He related that there are safe-
.guards built into this project which prevents the specter of a
deteriorating affordable housing project since it provides for a good
mix of different types of tenants. He indicated that if this project
is denied, the ordinances need to be amended.
Commissioner Hasse stated that these projects have to be placed
someplace, but questioned why a rental project should be placed in the
middle of a homeowner project. He declared that the number of
vehicles that will be coming out of this project may be less than 5%
but immediately adjacent to this project is another development which
may also be less than 5%, and so forth down the road and before long
there will be an impact of 13%. He noted that he does not concur with
'i, .-placlng a rental project in the midst of a fine residential homeowner
'. >i commun i ty.
Commissioner Shanahah announced that he has a great problem with
the intrusion Into the single family neighborhood in addition to con-
cerns relative to transportation. He indicated that he is ~n favor of
22
Page 12
September 10, 1991
ffordable housing but until the community is ready to stand up and
~ort the Board of County Commissioners more fully, it will be
y difficult to provide affordable housing. He related that he
believes the proposed is a good quality project.
~.ii~ County Attorney Cuyler cautioned the Commission that it cannot be
illegally distin~uished merely on the basis of rental versus ownership.
Co~issioner Hasse moved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe that
PUD-89-1(1) be denied.
~:i, . Commissioner Saunders divulged that he is voting in favor of this
~etition, based on the recommendations of staff and the Planning
He affirmed that the Commission has set up the framework
for this type of petition, through ordinances.
~ ~ ¢mll for the question, the motion carried 3/2 (Commissioner
S&un~ere and Commissioner Goodnight opposed).
Commissioner Volpe stated that discussions have been held with
respect to the economic analysis that should be done in advance of
these projects. He noted that his contention is that if a person
~i,seeks density bonus credits for an affordable housing project, the
entire project should be reviewed in terms of the commitments the
y will be asked to make, i.e. density bonuses, waivers of impact
fees, water/sewer etc. He noted that this approach would provide a
~better analysis of what is needed to get the project up and running.
Co~missioner Saunders concurred with Commissioner Volpe's remarks
i-land suggested that staff re--think that approach. He noted that as
10ng as the present ordinances are on the books, petitioners will be
(~ relying on same.
"' Commissioner Goodnight cited that the Growth Management Plan pro-
~des for 3 or 4 units, depending on the traffic situation. She indt-
that if an individual desires to develop an affordable housing
i~project and is only asking for density bonuses to allow 8-11 units per
/acre she does not believe that the Commission should be involved with
economic basis of same.
~$s'" ~%m~e~: 11:$0 A.M.
De~mt¥ Clerk Fartie
- Reconvened: 11:45 A.M. at which time
reduced Deputy Clerk Hoffman
uuO~'~,:
Page 13
September 10, 1991
:RESOLUTION 91-633 APPROVING THE FORM OF PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT
IN CON~CTION WITH THE DISTRICT'S WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS,
S~IP~ 1991; TH~ IMPROVE~NTS TO BE FINA~TCED WITH SUCH BONDS; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE - ADOPTED
County Manager Dotrill stated that this item will approve the pre-
liminary offering statement and advise the Board of County Commis-
sioners with respect to the current estimate of pricing for the some
thirty-one million dollar Utility Bond issue that, among other things,
will provide the cost to complete utility projects throughout the
district, the largest of which is the water treatment plant. He con-
firmed that this is the first non General Obligation occasion where
this County went through a bond rating through the two rating institu-
!ticns.
Commissioner Goodnight acknowledged the efforts of those who
endeavored to acquire the "A" rating which was received.
Marc Samet confirmed that Collier County received genera] "A"
category ratings, specifically, Standard and Poors giving an A- and
~. Moody's giving an A1. He expressed hope that the insurers will
!%ill'reflect in their premiums the ratings received by Collier County. He
stated the bids on the water plant are due in on October and, due to
· the delay, it is desirable to delay pricing of the bonds in order to
avoid oversizing based on the bids. He reported that the rating by
~i~Moody's is an upper medium grade and is significant in that it allows
bank trust departments to buy these bonds.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Assistant Utilities Administrator
Bloetscher reported that staff looked at the monies on hand versus the
projects to be done in the various fiscal years to assemble a project
list. He reported that most of the master pump stations on staff's
list are supposed to be constructed in the fiscal year beginning
October 1st and, thus, the bond Issue is set up that way. H~
concluded that he feels comfortable with the set of projects as pre-
>~sented.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. B]oetscher confirmed that
Page 14
September 10, 1991
~f~':iconstructton for neither of the wastewater plants is included here.
He added, however, there is money on hand to do engineering on the
north plant; that the Request for Proposals (RFP's) have been
received; and a shortlist for selection will probably be presented to
the Board of County Commissioners sometime within the next sixty days
or so. He stated it is felt there is not sufficient funds on hand
to do the engineering on the south plant as it .is estimated to be
approximately two million dollars with the total project estimated at
around ten million dollars.
County Manager Dotrill explained that the reason for requesting a
~i/i: one week delay for even the cost associated with the price for the
water treatment plant is to have the benefit of the bids received.
In response to Commissioner Volpe questioning the estimate for the
north county, Mr. Bloatschar indicated it will be approximately four-
teen and a half million dollars.
Cem~iulon~r Shanaban ~oved, eeconded by Commissioner Saunders and
;c~rrl~dun~ntmmu~ly, to approve the distribution of the Preliminary
Official Statement (PO$), approve the project for financing, authorize
· to certi~F it u deemed final and mail same, thereby adopting
R~ao/utton 91-633.
Page 15
September 10, 1991
L
~'iii~Zssl~$~ aFFXC~I~a ~ co~Pos~TIo~ ~ Fo~c?~o~s o~ T~ COLL~ZR CO~
~~ ~~ ~ - ST~ ~I~CTED TO CO~CT ~. ~ BELIN
~ JA~ ~I~Z ~ ~IR ~SlGNATIONS ~ IF TH~ ~ NOT WITHD~W
S~ ~ NO~ ~ESS WILL BE FOLLO~D TO SEC~E REPLAC~S
Assistant County Attorney Manalich explained that of the four
issues currently facing the Collier County Hispanic Advisory Board,
.two issues Involve the application of Ordinance 91-37, as amended by
-91-78, which is the Ordinance that created the advisory board. He
implied that one of the issues in question involves the meaning of the
section of the Ordinance dealing with the requirement that the County
Manager and staff provide "technical support" for the board's func-
tions. He added that related to that is Section 6 regarding reimbur-
.sement for expenses reasonably Incurred upon prior approval of the
Board of County Commissioners.
In reply to Mr. Manalich's comments regarding the assistance to be
?{~/ !afforded the Advisory Board by the Board Office, Commissioner
~oodnight verified that she has volunteered the services of the Board
Office for copying and distribution of the minutes together with the
agenda once the Advisory Board has prepared same into a finished form.
Gounty Manager Dotrill stated that, in his opinion, that is what
was intended. He explained that the extent to which the Board Office
call support either of the two new minority advisory committees is only
on a peripheral type basis. He added that they are incorporating the
cost for mailing the agendas as well as xeroxing of same.
Go~]ssloner Goodnight reiterated that the Board Office will xerox
~f~..: the minutes and mail them out along with the agenda.
Gouty Manage~ Dotrill pointed out that it will be necessary for
someone on the Advisory Committee to serve as recording secretary and
J'>t~e ~ abbreviated set of minutes.
Regarding Section 7 of Ordinance 91-37, Mr. Manallch ~eported the
.~iss~e of whether the Advisory Board can hear grievances tn individual
"cases affecting Collier County government has come up.
Oo~tsstoner Saunders stated that the easy way to resolve the
Page 16
September 10, 1991
'issue is for the majority vote of the members of the Advisory Board to
i~etermtne whether they are Going to hear the matter or not. He indi-
cated, however, that items involving the School Board or the City of
Naples should not be addressed by the Advisory Board.
Mr. Manaltch reported that the concern of the County Attorney's
!,~i~Office is for individual cases which might involve Collier County as a
'party to the litigation.
County Attorney Cuyler confirmed that is a concern of his Inasmuch
as Mr. Manaltch is the liaison to the Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board
and also represents the Board of County Commissioners.
Commissioner Saunders suggested that when there is a perceived
conflict of interest on the part of either Mr. Manallch or the County
!"i! Attorney's Office, then the County Attorney will simply not be present
during the discussion.
Courity Attorney Cuyler agreed with Commissioner Saunders' remarks.
.~:~ He cautioned the Board of County Commissioners that this is an organi-
.zatton which has a cloak of authority from the County and, therefore,
advised caution regarding the types of individual cases that might be
heard and could then develop into litigation against the Board of
i. County Commissioners as representatives of Collier County. He cited
the example of an employment discrimination allegation which could
'-come back to haunt the Board of County Commissioners should the
Advisory Board determine there is a prob]em.
Commissioner Saunders pointed out that, although the Advisory
Board may have some official sanction inasmuch as it is created by
Ordinance, it is purely an advisory board. He added that should the
Advisory Board chose to hear an employment discrimination case and
the County Attorney refuses to be present during the discussions
beta'use it is a matter involving potential litigation, then when the
Advisory Board presents its report to the Board of County
Commissioners it will not be accepted due to that potenti91 of litiga-
tion.
County Manager Dotrill stated should the Board of County
Page 17
September 10, 1991
ssioners allow the Advisory Board to become involved in the
~perattonal aspects of hearing grievances or allegations involving
Individual discrimination, then it has allowed the Advisory Board to
become involved In an operational or management aspect, and he took
:~:':.exception to any Advisory Board which becomes involved in operational
'decision-making.
Commissioner Volpe commented that employment discrimination issues
seem inappropriate matters to be heard by this Advisory Board.
County Manager Dorrlll stated that, aside from employment discri-
mination issues, the Advisory Board should have free reign to look at,
evaluate and make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners
anything they want to, to which County Attorney Cuyler concurred.
Commissioner Saunders suggested the the Board of County
Commiastoners, by expressinG its opinion, can advise the Advisory
;'Board that they are not to hear personnel matters or other Items which
may be directly involved with the management decisions of the County
Manager. He added that, should they fail to heed that recommendation,
the alternative is to amend the Ordinance to reflect what their
authority is, which could prove more restrictive.
In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Manalich reflected that the
first meeting of the Advisory Board was principally organizational in
'nature and, prior to his reporting at the second meeting of same, the
'-issues before the Board of County Commissioners today arose Involving
~?" the composition of the Advisory Board and, therefore, his report was
never formally presented at the second meeting.
Mr. Manaltch reported that a request was made by Mr. Valdes for
~removal of four or flve members of the Advisory Board. He stated
':'(!i::%ha't at a meeting of the Advisory Board, amidst allegations' of viola-
Y':'.tton of the Sunshine Law, Dr. Frank Beltran and,Jaime Gutierrez ten-
dered their resignations while disputing said allegations.
Commissioner Saunders stated that anyone having an allegation of
violation of the Sunshine Law should talk to either the County
am 000. : 32 Page 18
September ]0, 1991
.~tttome¥ or the State Attorney as the Board of County Commissioners is
not the appropriate entity to hear such allegations.
Mr. Manaltch relayed his understanding that any mention of the
S~nshine Law violations today will be in regard to the fitness for
continued service on the Advisory Board.
Commissioner Volpe concurred and added that it is appropriate to
have a written report submitted regarding the inability of a person to
continue to serve on the Advisory Board. He suggested that, as the
Advisory Board has not even passed the organizational stage, a state-
ment that someone is unable to carry out the duties and respon-
sibilities of the office might be a bit premature.
Commissioner Saunders pointed out that there is a procedure for
the appointment and removal of members of Advisory Boards. He stated
that, to his knowledge, never before have members of an Advisory Board
or community members come forward requesting the Board of County
Commissioners to remove people from an Advisory Board without benefit
of any written request of the Advisory Board to do so. He suggested
not accepting the resignations of Dr. Beltran and Mr. Gutierrez until
they formally present same and, if the resignations are presented, the
Board of County Commissioners will then go through the appointment
~process for new members.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that the problem Mr. Manalich is
encountering as staff liaison is that the Advisory Board is not func-
tioning due to the organizational type problems. He explained that in
addltion to the two Advisory Board members which resigned there was a
cr~orum that was asked to resign at the organizational meeting.
Bernardo A. Garcia stated it was inappropriate to stop the second
meeting of the Advisory Board due to someone alleging violation of the
Sunshine Law. He expressed his belief that both Dr. Beltran and Mr.
Gutierrez are extremely trustworthy hardworking Jndivfduals whose
resignations were obtained under duress. He stated that he wants the
message to go out that the application process is a democratic process
and open to all interested persons.
Page 19
September 10, 1991
.... :. Zac Lucto proffered his credentials which included Director and
;'{Founder of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Collier County and
~ ~'Chatrman of the Advisory Committee for Hispanic Affairs of Collier
County. He suggested having the Advisory Board meetings during the
evening at locations convenient to the community which it is to serve.
Commissioner Hasse announced that Mr. Lucio's proposals are up to
the Advisory Board itself to determine.
Commissioner Saunders concurred with Commissioner Hasse, adding
that the Board of County Commissioners will not organize the Advisory
~: . Board as opposed to having the Board organize itself.
Alex Castro, Vice Chairman of the Advisory Board, indicated that
having the Advisory Board meetings at various locations of the county
is a primary goal in performing service to their community.
Commissioner Volpe reiterated that is a decision which should be
~ made by a majority of the Advisory Board.
Victor A. Voldes proffered his credentials which included
'-President of the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Collier County as
well as affiliation with the newspaper, Los Nactones. He voiced sup-
port for the proposal of meetings being held in various locations con-
yentent to the community.
In response to Mr. Valdes reporting that a complaint has been
filed with the State Attorney's Office regarding violation of the
Sunshine Law, Commissioner Saunders directed Mr. Manaltch to confirm
$~[me.
In response to Manuel Rodriguez Jr., Commissioner Saunders agreed
· "that the Board of County Commissioners wants to hear about problems
regarding violation of County regulations, but added that this is not
the forum to do so.
· Tony Perez Benitoa stated he does not wish to see the Advisory
i..Board become a grievance committee. He confirmed that the problem,
' as he sees it, is within the Hispanic Advisory Board itself as the
board has not yet functioned in its intended form.
Gommtsstoner Saunders stated he does not feel it appropriate for
Page 20
September 10, 1991
:he Board of County Commissioners to accept any resignations at this
":time.
Nelson A. Munoz voiced his willingness to promote the objective of
.the Advisory Board.
In response to Mr. Manalich reporting that staff is in receipt of
two resignation letters, County Attorney Cuyler directed Mr. Manalich
to contact the members and request that they withdraw their resigna-
~ions. lie added that should they decline to withdraw their resigna-
tions, applications will be solicited to fill those vacancies.
.,.e~.,-~: ~2:50 P.M. - R~onvened: 1:45 P.M. at ~ich
'~W Cl~k ~tn replac~ ~ty Clerk Farrts
.~OL~I~ 91-~S4 R~ PETITION AV 91-O09, AGNOLI, BARBER & BRU~DAGE,
~., ~%~.~ ~ ~, COLLIER D~LO~ CO~TION, ~Q~STING
V~~ O~ A ~ZON OF ~ P~T OF COLLIER H~ P~ - ~D
~.~ ~ ~PROV~ ON 9/17/91 ,
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
Au~st 11th and August 18, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of
Publication flied with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to con-
i~..
sider Petition AV 91-009, filed by Agnoli0 Barber & Brundage, Inc., as
!ii'i agent for owner, Collier Development Corporation, requesting vacation
of a portion of the plat of Collier Health Park as recorded in Plat
Book 17, Pages 50-51, inclusive, of the public records of Collier
County, Florida.
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald noted both this
.'item and the following item, Petition AV 91-010, are vacation pert-
'?i.-ttons on the Collier Reserve pro3ect. He said Petition AV 91-009 is a
request for vacation of Tract A, the utility and some road rights-of-
,way, with the intent of being incorporated into the Collier Reserve
i, proJect. He advised the actual intensity of use will be reduced
because currently, the property under the Collier Health Park is
:allowed for uses to include retail, office buildings, medical institu-
~.:i!ttons, and various assisted care facilities. Under the .Collier
!;:/!.iReserve project, he said, those uses will be restricted to either
.i.~mlti or single-family residences. He indicated the appropriate let-
Page 21
September 10, 1991
ters of no ob3ection have been received and based on the condition
That any action of the Board will be sub3ect to final approval of the
CollieF Reserve plat, Staff is recommending approval of Petition AV
91-010.
Commissioner Volpe questioned if this vacation will result in any
traffic impacts? Mr. Archibald advised the intensity of use regarding
traffic is much lower. He stated the relatively small multi and
single family use will produce much less traffic on Immokalee Road,
U.S. 4! and the surrounding roads than any kind of commercial or medi-
cal related use.
~~i~r Voll:~ ~:~, seconded by Contseioner Shmnmhmn and
c~t~ ~mly, to close ~he ~bllc hearing.
C~~e~ Sh~ ~ed, seconded by Co~ss~oner H~se ~d
~i~ ~i~ly, ~o appr~e Petition AV 91-009 ~b3ect to approval
of ~ f~l plat of the Collier Rescue, thereby adopting Resolution
Page 22
September ~0, 199!
· I~OLUT~ON'gl--635 RE PETITION AV 91-010, AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE,
- XNC., U~4~NTFORO%~NER, COLLIER DEVELOPMENT COR~TION, ~Q~STING
VA~ OF A ~ION OF ~ PLAT OF RI~RC~SE SHOPPING CE~ER -
~~ ~~ ~ ~P~T ~PROV~ ON 9/1~/9~
Legal notice having been published ~n the Naples Da~ly News on
Au~s~ RSth and September 1, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of
~bl~cat~on f~led w~th the Clerk, public hearing was~opened to con-
s~de~ Petition AV 91-010, filed by Agnoli, Barber & B~undage, Inc., as
.~./agen~ fo~ owne~, Collier Development Corporation, requesting vacation
~of a po~t~on of the plat of Rlvemchase Shopping Cente~ as ~ecorded in
Pla~ Book 18, Pages 19-20, ~ncjustve, of the public records of Collier
County, Florida.
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald presented Petition
t~{AV 91-010 stating this request is to vacate a small triangle of the
shopping center parcel for a golf course and open space. He said this
.vacation will be offset by water management improvements that will be
'.'. part of the Collier Reserve project. He noted Staff has received the
appropriate letters of no objection and is recommending approval with
!i~the condition that the document not be executed until such time as the
· ' Collier Reserve plat is approved.
~c~i~one~ Shanahan ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Hasse and
~XT~ ~~ly, to close the ~bltc hearing.
~i~= S~ ~ed, seconded by Co~issioner Hasse ~d
c~ ~~, to a~rove Petition AV 9~-0~0 ~b]ect to approval
· ~ t~ fill plmt of the Collier ~ee~e, thereby adopting Resolution
Page 23
· September lO,
~'~T~'~1-636 ~ PKTITION S~-91-11, GEO~ P~SE OF ~RS-~SE
' ~ '~ ~~ ~R HIDD~ ~I~E, ~R PROPER~ L~ATED SOUTH OF
"~ ~, ~T OF THE WI~ST~ ~ ~ APPROXI~TELY 1/3 MILE
~ ~ ~~ ~I~ - A~ED S~CT TO PETITIO~R~S AGRE~
~ ~ ~D
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
Auglist 11, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition SMP-91-11,
filed by Geoffrey Purse of Evers-Purse Associates, Inc., representing
William Klohn, requesting Subdivision Master Plan approval for Hidden
Pointe, for property located south of Haldeman Creek, East of the
Windstar PUD and approximately 1/3 mile west of Bayshore Drive, in
parts of Sections ll and 14, Township 50 South, Range 25 East.
Frank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator, noted
this item was continued from the meeting of August 27th. He said
discllssion involved a request from a resident in the area of the pro-
.posed project that the developer install a sidewalk. He noted the
estimated cost of the sidewalk is $8,400. He said Staff counted 100
lots in the development, 36 dwelling units of the petitioner and 61
units in the adjacent area.
Jeff Purse, representing the petitioner, stated the surrounding
icommunity has been in existence for 34 years and there have problems
concerning the safety of children in the area for the past 10 years.
He said his client should not be required to install the full length
of a sidewalk, adding they are willing to pay 50% of the cost as their
fair share. He said if the Board requires them to absorb the entire
cost of the sidewalk, his client is requesting that an additional sti-
pillarion be added that the sidewalk will be constructed prior to
issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the llth lot, which is
one-.half of the proposed project.
Lucy Woodworth reiterated the concerns of area residents with the
additional traffic to be generated by this project. She urged the
Board not to approve this request without ensuring a sidewalk will be
Page 2 4
i~:~ September 10, 1991
built.
Commissioner Volpe Inquired what the County plans are for a bike
In the subject area? Mr. Archibald indicated Staff has a bike
'k::path Improvement program in the bid process at the current time. He
said although not funded, this project may be added to that program.
He mentioned almost 50% of the projects in the bike path improvement
program are similar to this situation, with developer commitments. He
stated the County may want to take advantage of the developer's offer
of $4,200 and see whether those funds would be sufficient under a
larger contract to do the entire area from Bayshore Drive to where the
~<~';,:.new proJec~ begins.
~t~ Ih~nmimn ~n~d, sa~on~ad by Co~misstoner Ruse ~d
~.~~.'~ly, to clue t~ ~blic he~ing.
~~t~r S~u ~ved, seconded ~ Coatsstoner Sanders ~d
=ig ~i~ly, to appr~e Petition 5~-91-11 subject to ~ t~e-
dttt~ ~i~tton ~ the d~slo~r of ~5,000 for a sld~lk, there~
:~~kl~ti~ 91-636.
Page 25
September 10, 1991
--:'PEYI~IO~ 1~-91-4, GARY YOUNG, REPRESENTING THE COLLIER COUNTY
8~!~tl O~I~ICE, REQUESTING A PROVISIONAL USE "b" OF SECTION 8.10
(~Tlan $~VICES) FOR GOVERNMENTAL FACILITIES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS
PO{t T~ ~ LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION
OF OIL ~ ~RJkDE ROAD AND ?0TH AVENUE N.E., IN SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP
47 SOOTHo RANGE 28 EAST, CONSISTING OF 6.77 ~ ACRES - CONTINUED TO
Mr. Brutt explained this item is a request for Provisional Use
"b", Essential Services for governmental use in the residential a~'ea
off Immokalee Road, approximately 2M miles east of the Corkscrew Fire
'~i. Station. Me said this petition was continued from the meeting of
August 2?th at which time discussion involved the use, intensity and
the hours of operation. He stated the Sheriff's representative was
asked to return to the Board regarding funding of the project.
Gary Young with the Sheriff's Office, remarked this request is
only for approval of the Provisional Use permit. He said the funding
~s being reviewed by the Sheriff after a request from the Board of
County Commissioners to reduce his proposed budget. He indicated
$300,000 is available in the capital improvement fund and an addi-
tional $100,000 has been approved from the Avatar Trust Fund.
In response to Commissioner Hasse, County Attorney Cuyler advised
the proposed facility meets the criteria that is laid out in the
trust agreement between Avatar and Collier County. He said this is a
police facility, is located in Golden Gate Estates and is for the pur-
pose of serving the residents of Collier County.
Dick Bramn indicated his agreement that the proposed facility will
be good for and is necessary to the community. However, he said, the
residents of Golden Gate Estates are not in favor of the proposed
location. He remarked the Sheriff has not submitted plans or cost
satiates for the project. He also suggested if the City of Naples,
i the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and Customs Service are going
to ~tilize the facility, they should be asked to share in the expense.
~e asked the Board to reject this request, statlnG the use of the
vAvatar Trust Funds for this facility, in his opinion, is illegal.
Page 26
September 10, lgg1
~'" .....In answer to Commissioner Hasse, County Manager Dorr~11
explained the $300,000 designated for thi~', facility by the SherJff's
i-i:~Offtce is within a budget that is controlled by the County Manager and
Board of Gounty Commissioners. He said the Board may decide to
~c%~t that $300,000 from the budget at the final budget hearing, but the
if:Sheriff carLnot because this capital imp:~ovement budget is not under
his control.-
"O~is~t~ Shanahah ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Hasms to
:,'~i(./ Commissioner Saunders suggested the Sheriff be informed that the
L Board is not willing to expend the necessary funds on this facility
~.~and allow him the opportunity to find funding elsewhere. He indicated
.!?it may be more appropriate to keep the option open until the budget
~hearing. He asked the Board to consider continuing this item until
the final budget hearing.
Oosat#ioaer $hanahanwtthdrew the motion.
O~m~i#t~ner Shanaban ~mvmd, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and
carried. uaantmly, to continue Petition PU-91-4 to the meeting of
;~.:~l~lept~b~ 24, 1991.
!rE PRTX~ZON PU-91-8, GEOFFREY G. PURSE OF
-a~O~IATES, INC., ~SE~ING G~F ~IALS ~CO~Y ~
-~C~ ~, INC., REQ~STING A ~OVISIONAL USE 'be OF SECTION
· .~O (~~ S~ICES) OF THE I~USTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT TO ALLOW A
~S~ ~C~ FACILI~ FOR PROPER~ LOCATED 660 PEET ~ST OF
AI~-~IN~ RO~ (C.R. 3~), APPROXI~TELY 3/4 MILE NOR~ OF PINE
RI~ ~O~ (C.R. ~96) ~JACE~ TO ~ NORTH OF PI~ AIR L~S PUD IN
· E~ION ~, ~HIP 49 SO~, ~GE 25 ~ST, CONSISTING OF 3.75 ACRES
- ~~ S~ TO PETITIO~R'S AGRE~ SHEET AS ~ED
Planner Milk explained the petitioner is requesting a Provisional
Use "b" of Section 8.10 (Essential Services) of the industrial zoning
disl:x'ict to allow a resource recovery facility. Hu ~atd the peti-
proposes to have an on-site stockpile of selected, non-toxic
materials recovered from construction job sites in order to
hand select and build artificial reef systems for distribution in the
Gulf of Mexico. He indicated the proposed site plan iljustrates a
materials recovery area for dumping and stockpile construction debris,
Page 27
September 10, lggl
~?'[materials staging area for sorting, a fabrication and storage area
!!.11.'iwhere the building materials will be selected to hand construct the
~:" .artificial reef systems and an area of storage bins for unnecessary
~aterials not required in the fabrication process. He advised land to
~7i :the west, north and east is zoned industrial with partial development.
He added land to the south is zoned PUD for a regional shopping mall
called Pine Air Lakes. He stated on August 15th, the CCPC recommended
%%nanimous approval, subject to the stipulations of the reviewing
Staff. He indicated most of those speaking at the CCPC hearing were
~-.'. in favor of this petition, however, there was opposition from owners
'of property directly to the west of the subject site. He concluded
· ~,based on all the factors and criteria involved in review of this pro-
Ject, Staff is recommending approval of Petition PU-91-8.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Planner Milk explained due to the
~..fact that the property is being leased for this project, along with
~Lthe existence of a public road, there is no requirement for a sub-
.~. division for this petition.
Gommissioner Volpe questioned what the current uses are on the
~ 'iparent parcel of land? Planner Milk indicated the parent parcel is
.. %~ndeveloped, however, co~talns outside storage on the tract that
' fronts Airport Road. He said most of that use is in violation due to
fencing requirements. He mentioned the site to the west contains
several dilapidated, unused buildings that could present a violation
for health and safety reasons. He reported the petitioner is
~i'~< requesting to develop and fence In the middle of the parent tract.
Commissioner Volpe inquired what is the essential service of this
~)etitlon? Planner Milk responded resource recovery is the essential
service.
Jeff Purse, representing the petitioner, explained the petitioner
has a contract with Commercial Cleanup as the sole lease holder. He
said they are the only people who will haul into this sfYe. He stated
the proposed operation will reduce the actual impact on the County's
landfill. He indicated the purpose of applying for a Provisional Use
Page 28
September 10, 1991
to construct artificial reefs out of construction debris. He pro-
i~tded the Board with photographs depicting a sample reef which showed
j:the types of materials that will be used. (Copies on file with the
Clerk to the Board.)
Commissioner Volpe indicated his concern with the possibility of
.'.-.the subject site becoming a transfer station and the impact that may
.. have on the surrounding area.
Mr. Purse stipulated the only intent of the operation is for use
.
!:'...as a resource recovery facility In order to build artificial reefs.
Planner Milk added Collier County will receive credits through the
use of this resource recovery facility because these materials will
not be added to the landfill.
Commissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Shanahan to
approv~ Petition PU-91-8 with the condition that the Provisional Use
provtde~ only for the ability of constructing artificial reefs and
will not be ued for any other type of resource recovery operation.
County Manager Dotrill suggested the amount of material that can
be stored on site be limited in order to avoid the possibility of
creating a mint landfill site.
Commissioner Volpe asked if a building will be constructed on the
site?
Trevor Tibstra with Commercial Cleanup, responded the only
building will be a small shed to contain a phone. With respect to
:?limiting the amount of materials on site, he advised a cap has already
been placed by the Transportation Department of five loads of
materials per day at the beginning of the operation, increasing to a
.,: maximum of 18 loads.
Mr. Purse stated the owner indicates there is a total debris
. istorage capacity of 360 loads which would comprise approximately one
~ :acre or 1/3 of the subject site.
Commissioner Volpe remarked this type of operation may not be com-
patible with the surrounding area. He suggested if approved, this
petition be reviewed in 12 months to see if any adverse effects have
I 000,, : 57
Page 29
September 10o 1991
developed.
County Manager Dorrtll commented 360 loads of material is worth
. ~i $80,000 in landfill tipping fees. He indicated his concern with the
.~.economtc impact of that much material, which is equal to four days of
'daily total capacity at the landfill. He recommended a maximum 180
loads be allowed to stockpile on the site.
Co~i~ton~r Saunders amended the motion, seconded by Commissioner
:' Shmx~m~n, that m ~xi~ of 180 loads of material be allowed on the
~.. sits ~m~'this petition will be reviewed in one year.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Tibstra advised his company
· is purchasing a scale for this facility. He said all loads will be
scaled and they will report to the Solid Waste Director how much
material is not being hauled to the landfill and is being re-used. In
way, he said, the County will receive the landfill credits.
Commissioner Volpe requested the landlord be asked to clean up the
~,~, rest of the site.
P/milner Milk noted that was a concern at the CCPC hearing. He
subsequently, charges were made to Code Compliance to research
'"the violations on site.
Dpe~n:~:~11 for the question, the motion carried unani~ously.
Page 30
September 10, 1991
replaced Deputy Clerk Ouevtn at this time ''
COORDINATOR GRAI~ APPLICATION -.APPROVED
MPO Coordinator Perry advised that this is a request to have the
Board of County Commissioners authorize the Chairman to sign a grant
application for a Florida Department of Transportation grant for a
Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator. He reminded the Commlsston that at
the August, 1991, Budget Workshop it was decided to phase in the sub-
~ect program starting in January, 1992, which changed the budget
~.:-. request from $20 000 to $10,000 He noted that County funding and the
i~!i;i{.State grant will provide $31,000 for the program for nine months. He
"informed that in FY 93 the County will apply for a similar grant from
c. the State, but following these two initial years the County will have
.. to fund the program 100%.
Commissioner Volpe related that he finds this difficult to support
.in light of the hiring freeze which the County is currently
experiencing.
Mr. Perry pointed out that the establishment of a
' bicycle/pedestrian program is a very important component of the
Gounty's Growth Management Plan.
· .. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Perry informed that Lee
County's bicycle/pedestrian program is funded locally for two posi-
tions. He added that the State is considering a continual funding
for this program using gas taxes.
Commissioner Shanahen remarked that the bicycle/pedestrian program
is essential and a necessity for a variety of reason with safety being
one of them, and feels justified in recommending the funding of
? $10,000 for the bicycle/pedestrian program.
" Mrs. Frances Barsh, member of the Taxpayer Action Group, stated
that she agrees with Commissioner Volpe in that the County is in a
hiring freeze. She pointed out that the requirement for local
~'~ matching funds is 10% of $21,000 which equals $2,100; therefore, the
County is overpaying the requirement. She expressed her concern
000 65
Page 31
September 10, 1991
':~g~dtng the creation of a new position which the County will have to
fund complstely in three years in the amount of $31,000 plus. She
!~'!~') raised the question as to why the County is currently spending $75,000
if the new individual will be devoting part of his time for planning
and engineering of the bicycle path. She continued that it appears
that the other aspects of this new position are already addressed
' threugh other departments within the County, and creating this posi-
tion Is a redundancy of manpower. She concluded with the recommen-
dation that the Board of County Commissioners not approve the funding
... for the bicycle/pedestrian coordinator.
Gommtssioner Volpe explained that the planning and engineering for
the bicycle paths is currently being handled through the County's
" ..Transportation Department, and the proposed program would enhance the
program. He commented, however, that he felt because of the economic
i 'situation the County is experiencing at the present time, the
f~ Transportation Department should continue to work this issue for one
more year or perhaps Development Services could assist.
Mr. Perry pointed out that the purpose of having a single person
coordinate the efforts of providing a bicycle/pedestrian path is to
i. develop a continuing and progressive program. He reiterated that this
: is a valuable program benefiting both old and new facilities. He
emphasized that it is the County's Intention to work toward a per-
marlent funding source in the form of impact fees.
In addressing the question raised regarding the 10% requirement of
i.(i $21,000, Mr. Perry informed that the absolute minimum amount the State
will accept for a local matching fund is $10,000. He pointed out that
in his division alone, they are losing two planning positions and
other divisions are also losing people, therefore, there is no one
available to handle the work required for this job.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Perry advised that the
$10,000 fu/Tding from the County would be derived from the General
Fund.
Ce~4~4on~r S~n~nders returned to the meeting.
Page 32
...;: , September 10, 19g!
In response to Commissioner Hasse, County Manager Dorrtll assured
.'.:i.'thtm that if there was someone in the position of loosing their Job
with the County and they met the qualification required for the
Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator, they would be moved into the openinG.
~l~ Sh~n~h~n ~ov~d0 seconded by Conissioner Saunders and
· c~r~l~ S/2 (~o~tsstoners Volp~ and H&sse opposed), to approve the
of.l~oz%~a'L'~on £o~ th~ Ch~lz~n to si~n the Btcycle/P~destri~n
~to~ ar~nt &ppltcatton.
Page 33
September 10, 1991
FOLL~UPI~CO~]FDATION$ ON CONTRACT DESIGN SERVICES FOR IllTH
&V~H, BT A~NOLI, BARBER ~ BR~AGE, INC. - APPRO~D IN THE ~O~
OF ~,654
Engineering Project Manager Ryztw explained that in response to
Board action on August 13, 1991, staff requests that the contract for
111th Avenue be divided Into two distinct phases.
Before addressing the contract for 111th Avenue, Mr. Ryziw pro-
vided the Commissioners with a handout listing the Transportation
Capital Projects, Status-Design Contracts (copy provided for the
record). He noted that there are 17 projects pending to begin engi-
neering design with a total of $6.7 million required to launch these
projects. He advised that in order to meet the Count¥'s Concurrency
Program these programs need to be started which has caused staff to
investigate alternative funding methods. He explained that the alter-
native being proposed is to present the contracts to the Board in pha-
ses which would moderate some of the financial constraints, provide a
better scheduling mode for right-of-way acquisition and environmental
permitting. He advised that the contract for 111th Avenue has, there-
fore, been reviewed from a phasing approach.
Mr. Ryziw reminded the Board that a contract had previously been
presented for 111th Avenue which had been negotiated with Agnoli,
Barber and Brundage, Inc., in the approximate amount of $230,000;
however, the proposed contract re-addresses this negotiation with a
two-phased action. He explained that the proposed contract is for
phase one in the amount of $99,654. He informed that upon the satis-
factory completion of phase one, staff shall petition the Board to
approve commencement of the phase two final design work under a
Sllpplemental Agreement. He noted that the 111th Avenue project is
belng prioritized because of its r~ght-of-way requirements and the
deterioration of its level of service to "E" over the next four years.
Commissioner Vo]pe agreed that the phasing is a good approach;
however, questioned whether this project should be deferred t:o allow
for funding of projects that are closer to the construction phase?
Page 34
September 10, 1991
Mr. Rlrziw explained that the proposed method of funding is an
~,:.attempt to prioritize the funding of projects in a phased manner by
committing the consultant to a fixed amount for the total project;
:' however, allowing the County to review the preliminary engineering and
environmental assessment before committing to the final project
i ,i-i; design.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Transportation Services
:.,!'.Administrator Archibald stated that the proposed project is not part
the shortfall for construction dollars in regards to the five year
~lan. He explained that this project is not planned for construction
within the five year plan; however, it is to the benefit of the County
to keep up the design phases of future road projects from an environ-
mental impact standpoint. He confirmed that there are no construc-
~['tion dollars involved with this contract which is indicated on the
· AUIR.
'~': ~~r $h~nah~n ~ved, seconded by Co--tesioner Hasse and
~t~o~l¥, to approv~ an ~nded Consulting Rngtneering
with Agnoli, Barber and Brundage, Inc. for 111th
" lv~mpl~ttltl~y engineering and environmental assessment services
in tb~ IW m fixed price contract amour of $99,654.
ooo
Page 35
September 10, 1991
4:10 P.N. - Reconvened: 4:20 P.M.
· cmm~~-v~a~c~ms m~vx~6 A ~TZD r.0~-CAR~YX,6 C~AC~r~ r, ZXC~-SS OF
Om~ ~O~ ~ ra~o~ Movm~rs or 60~DO~ ST~-~. C0r. L~.~ C0URr
~.'.. ~SrS~S ~ ~ r,~ mrr~ANcz To C0U~Te0US-- P~AZA SOUSe 70 COr. L~.
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald advised that the
proposed resolution would create truck restrictions on Gordon Street,
Peters Street, and Collee Court which are ~ust south of Courthouse
Plaza.
, :,~ ',~-:~ O~tssisl~m- i~nders ~ov~d, s~conded b~ Comtestoner liesee ~d
c~~m~tt~u~ly, to &dopt Resolution No. 91-638.
Page 36
September 10, lggl
ADDITZO~!A~ ~ER~rZCES BY COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. FOR
~TX~I OF A MASTER SI~ ~ ~ ~AG~ P~ ~R ~ ~FOOT
~ ~ P~ FACILI~ ~SU~ TO FD~ L~SE A~~ NO. 3868
-- ~ ZN ~ ~ OF $11~920
agenda t~em is a supplemental ag~eeme~ fo~ a~ o~-~ co~:ac~ ~i~
:~management plan ~o~ pa:~ o~ ~e Ba~e~oo~ ~eac~ comp~e~ion, fie a~vise~
~' ~that the proposed ag~eemen~ ~s a ~eco~enda~io~ ~o expand ~e existing
contract ~tth Coastal Enginee~tng Consultants, ~nc. ~o compl~ ~i~ a
sttpulat~on found in ~he lease between the Florida Depa~tmen~ of
Natural Resources, ~epresentinG the Internal Improvement Trust Fund,
and Collle~ County which is the ~equ1~ement of a management plan for
~he portion of the beach the County has leased f~om the State. He
noted that to meet the intent of the lease this management plan needs
to be completed by the end of 1991, and can be accomplished by
e~dtng the existing management plan developed fo~ the portion of
*~*~he beach o~ed by the County. He pointed out that the completion of
~3~.~**thts management plan will p~ovtde an tndlcatlon as to what the deve-
lopment will be of the southern p~ese~ve as established by the State.
fie informed that the actual work entailed by this a~reement will be
s~aff ~d consultant time alon~ with finishing plannin~ documents and
~.~'~'* site ~ev~ews as well as some surveying. He commented that the
~ecuttve Summary p~ovtdes the costs for the items of work to be per-
fo~med which total $11,920.
. In ~esponse to Commlssfone~ Volpe, County Mana~em Dor~111 stated
'~hat the p~tma~y direction for this site will be for a low-impact,
. c~shed shell o~ lime rock ~oad to extend to the south from the paved
~oad with 40 om 50 additional pa~ktn~ spaces as well as surveying,
design and potential future dune crossove~ structures. He noted that
this needs to be submitted because of a condition of the County's lon~
~,~J~te~m lease with DNR.
':~ ..... ~l~ ~ee ~, seco~ed ~ Co~se~oner S~ ~d
000 , 15'3
Pa~ 3~
September 10, 1991
[y0 to approve a Supplemental Agreement for addi-
~[i'-tio~ui ~ting services in the ~mxt~um amount of $11,920 with
Consultant.. Inc. SEE PAGES .~7.~--~ 77
INVOLVING 8.R. 951, PARCEL 126.R, DEL'$
I~ROPERTY - APPROVED
· Transportation Services Administrator Archibald advised that this
item is a recommendation to approve a Stipulated Final Judgment for
S.R. 951, Parcel 126.R, known as Del's Convenience Store. He advised
~ the proposed final judgment has been executed by the landowner, Mrs.
'.Fayard, and the lessees, Mr. and Mrs. Ackerman. Mr. Archibald
"' reminded the Board that previous agreements presented to the Board
[i~ were not executed by both parties. He explained that the proposed
agreement sets forth a payment of $150,000 to the landowner and the
· 'lessees as well as a payment of $27,541.25 to the attorneys repre-
sentinG the landowner and a $6,500 payment to the attorneys repre-
se~ting the lessees. He reported that staff is recommending the
allocation of $14,000 for the cost of expert witness fees. He
i clarified that the attorneys' fees and the expert witness' fees on the
of the defendants are compensable charges to Collier County. In
'Justification of the $150,000 payment, Mr. Archibald asserted that
this represents compensation for additional attorney's and specialist
fees amounting to approximately $30,000 incurred by the defendants
;; which the County will not be payinG for, and with the signing of this
agreement the County will not be held responsible for. Be added that
'-.( also a part of the $150,000 payment will be for costs in the amount of
[.': approximately $24,000 which were incurred by the defendant at the
order of taking and involved relocatton fees, updating of appraisals
.~;~rov!ded, and a claim for site improvements. He pointed out that a
trial, which is at the option of the Board, could expose the
.C~llrlty to a higher settlement cost. He informed that staff Is recom-
mendinG approval of the proposed Stipulated Final 3udgment.
In response to Commissioner Saunders, County Attorney Cuyler
Page 38
September 10, 1991
':ment agreement, and he assured that it is legally appropriate.
Mr. Kobza also affirmed in response %o Commissioner Saunders that
his clients are in agreement with the proposed settlement agreement.
Commissioner Shanahan questioned Mr Archibald as to whether he
feels this is a fair and equitable agreement to which Mr. Archibald
'c~onfirmed that it is and and added that it is one that all parties are
:.~ agreeable to.
.?~l. Commissioner Shanahan noted that it appears it ts in the County's
· best interest not to proceed with a jury trial.
Commissioner Volpe expressed hls concern regarding this issue
settinG a precedence for future condemnation litigation procedures.
Oc~mtut~r Shanahah ~ed, seconded by Co~missloner Hasme and
,~ried uz~n~ou~ly to approve the Stipulated Final $ud~ent for S.R.
g51 1~1~1 126.R, Del's convenience store property.
..-: vt~m '.~Zl
~~NITH TH~ NAPLES DAILY NEWS - COMTII~JgD TO DATE TO BE
Administrative Services Administrator Ochs stated that this item
is a recommendation to authorize the sole source purchase of legal and
general advertising services from the Naples Daily News. He explained
· ..that the sole source determination is based on staff's analysis of
overall circulation data for newspapers with Collier County; there-
fore, staff is recommending the waiver of competitive bidding and
authorize the purchase of advertisinG services for FY 91-92 to the
. ..Naples Daily News.
it: In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Ochs advised that the
i? ~'~urrent year budget for legal and general advertising is $242,000.
'~nformed that the advertisement is designed to reach the maximum
He
~Ot~t of citizens in Collier County through general circulation which
ii::?;~n ter~s of sale numbers would be through the Naples Daily News. He
noted that legal advertisement through a newspaper of general cir-
"> .:culat~on ~s a Florida Statute.
Page 39
September 10, 1991
Go~u~t¥ Attorney Cuyler answered Commissioner Volpe's question by
that the Naples Daily News is not the only newspaper of
.% ~'general circulation within Collier County; however, it is the one that
.sl~pplies the highest circulation which is a criteria of staff for
iadvertisement.
)>:/ Co~mtssioner Volpe pointed out that to comply to the Florida
only the legal advertisement needs to be advertised in a
j. newspaper of general circulation, but other advertisement could be
handled through other media outlets such as radio or television.
Gommissioner Saunders agreed that the widest dispersal of the
Count¥'s advertisements is through the Naples Daily News and recom-
mended approval of staff's recommendation.
County Manager Dotrill cited that originally this item was
requested to be continued for one week in order to provide the
· Commissioners with a more complete information package; however, Mr.
~ Ochs has been able to supply the information.
Frances C. Barsh, representing the Taxpayer's Action Group,
i.~[ questioned the types of rates being negotiated with the Naples Daily
News, and specifically whether they are non-profit rates? Mr. Ochs
~ responded that he did not know and would find out. Mrs. Barsh
added that with the volume of advertising provided by the County,
~-there should be a discount extended by the newspaper and suggested
hthat this be researched.
Fred Tarrant, representing the Taxpayer's Action Group, stated
that while the County has an obligation to disseminate the legal
· advertisement to the residents of the County, they also have an oblf-
gat/on to the taxpayer to request competitive bidding when such a
large amount of money is involved.
Commissioner Hasse suggested that this item be postponed for a
in order to do the research needed regarding costs for adver-
i <rising on radio and television as well as the newspapers.
Commissioner Volpe concurred.
Commissioner Goodnight pointed out that a majority of District 5
Page 40
September 10, 1991
not have the option of receiving any County advertising through
~radio or television.
· Commissioner Volpe and Commissioner Shanahan concurred that
*~f~lrther information is needed on alternative advertising methods.
{ Oommfssioner Goodnight informed that this item will be continued.
,.Oounty Manager Dorrill agreed and noted that it will be rescheduled
when the information requested is available.
:_.~w~ ~ FOR TH~ COOPERATIVE EFFORT TO MASTER PLAN ..~m~j~ (COLLX~R) ARD BONITA B~ACH PARK (LEE) -
Assistant County Attorney Manalich noted that this item was con-
tinued from a week ago and at this time another one week continuance
i.:' is requested. County Manager Dorrlll concurred.
· ~..~71 Commissioner Goodnight stated that this item is continued to
~?!!September 17, 1991.
~ B~EN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND LONNIE J.
TRII~TE~, AS SETTLEMENT OF THE CONDEMNATION CASE OF COLLIER
V. TEXI~k~D PROPERTIES, ET AL., FOR THE TAKING OF A PORTION OF
120 AND 131 FOR THE S.R. 951FOUR-LANING - APPROVED
County Attorney Cuyler explained that this is a request for an
approval of an agreement between the Board and a condemnee for Parcels
120 and 131 of the S.R. 951 four-laning. He advised that the County
has paid $305,200 for the right-of-way which is a good faith appraisal
of the value of this property. In reference to the Agreement attached
to the executive summary, County Attorney Cuyler recommended that the
Board approve it.
~%1' Commissioner Shanahan commented that it appears that it will be to
'.i the 0o%lnt¥'s best interest to approve the agreement.
,,.,,~';~ Gottnt¥ Attorney Cuyler assured the Board that he is very sensitive
to any agreement involving zoning; however, in this case, after a
complete review with the Planning Department, it is clearly the recom-
mendation of the County Attorney's office that this agreement be
approved.
m
Page 41
September 10, 1991
.... ~d~l~ ~ moved, seconded by Commissioner Hmsse ~d
...... ~g ~~1~, t~t the A~nt with Louie J. ~rttn, T~stee
~ ~tl~'~ ~~c~ co~e~tion case ~ approved.
Page 42
September 10, 1991
91-317 - ADOPTED
Co.~/~toner $~underm moved, meconded by Commissioner Basse and
· c~1-~ u~nt~ou~l¥, that Budget ~n~ent 91-31T ~ adopted.
It~J1U
:-~~ ~. 91-639, ~I~ING WILLI~ CLE~KNON TO ~ P~S ~
Administrative Assistant Filson advised that as a result of the
resignation of Steven R. Ball, representing District 4, an appointment
[of one member to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is requested.
~'$he pointed out that of the three resumes received in response to the
~'.: press release only one person resides in District 4; therefore, staff
'..and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board are recommending the
appointment of William Clendenon of District 4.
Comm/~toner Hume moved, seconded by Commissioner Shanaban and
:-~ 'c~xTl~1~n&ntmou. l¥, that William Clendenon be appointed u a member
to t~e ~k~ and Recreation Advisory Board, thereby adopting
i,. *,,B~m~oln~lon~o. 91-639.
Page 43
September 10, 1991
~hM~'~q~'~~ ~ISSlO~ERS ' CO!~UNICATIONS
In reference to comments by Commissioner Volpe, County Manager
Dotrill noted that he Is preparing a response to a letter received
~':from the current vendor for the County Fleet Management Division and
provide a copy to the Board.
~i :. COmmissioner Shanahan noted that he will be representing Collier
/'i[I[I County at a meeting for the Tenth University siting on September
~CATIONS
County Manager Dotrill reminded the Board that he has received a
request for a workshop from the Economic Development Council and
~i;% anothez' request concerning an Affordable Housing workshop. He noted
J/ that he has advised both parties that these would be scheduled after
the budget hearings and comprehensive planning hearings.
~ ..(k~mt~toner Hasse moved, seconded by Commissioner Shanahah
m~d c~rted unanimously, that the following tteu under the
con~ent a~nda be approved and/or adopted: es.
i'.<- ,-~~ TO L~t~E AGR~T BETWEEN LEWIS COLLINS AND COLLIER COUNTY
See Pages /F~~' / e~
7.-
R~Or-~fiON 91-570 I~ORIZlN8 FIN~ ACCE~CE OF ROA~AY, D~INAGE,
~ ~ ~ S~ I~O~S FOR ~ FINAL P~T OF "TOLLGATE
~I~ C~, P~SE 0~" ~ ~L~SE OF ~I~EN~CE SEC~I~
~. See Pages I el
E~~ OF Sl~I~ DR SUBDIVISION I~RO~S FOR 'MI~i ON THE
'3 ~'~ AT ~AIL ~ VIL~GE" - WITH STI~TIONS
1. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Construction,
Maintenance and Escrow Agreement.
~' 2. That no Certificates of Occupancy will be granted until the
required improvements receive preliminary acceptance.
See Pages /Fa' ~)~
:~.:~I~IFTI~.OI--811 AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF ROADMAY, DRAINAGE,
IMP~~ IN 'MOON LAKE UNIT THREE#, RELEASE
00o , 178
Page 44
,- See Pages
': It'~m-,l~ -- ~eed to Item ~9A1
· -- Deleted
'PROVIDING FOR ASSES-~M~IT OF LI~N, FOR TH~ COST OF
OF F~BLIC NUISg. WC~ ON LOT 15, BLOCK 193 OF MARCO BEACH
P. AMARNANI OWNER
See Pages
Itsu ~16A7b
::.: "~~ 91-573 ~OVIDIN~ ~R ~SES~ OF LIEN FOR ~ COST OF
~ ~~ OF ~LIC ~IS~ ON L~ 1~, BLOCK 190, ~CO B~CH
see
i.~ Iteu #16A?c
R~OL~TION 91-574 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
THE a~aT~M~]Ff OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 21, BLOCK 101, MARCO BEACH
UNIT THBA~f LUIS A. AND CRISTINA L. BERNAL, OWNERS
See Pages
I~OL~TIO~ 91-575 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
*~qTH~T~T OF P~BLIC NUISANC~ ON LOT 15, BLOCK 348, MARCO BEACH
.... UNIT*T~N, MANY &. BOLTZ AND B~V~RLY T. BOLTZ, OWNERS
See Pages
91--576 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
t-:r-~F~-~,T~FF OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 13, BLOCK 348, MARCO BEACH
:r,-~T~-*~%~K~ A. BOLTZ OWNER
91--577 PROVIDING ~R ~SES~ OF LIEN DR ~ COST OF
~~ OF ~LIC ~IS~CE ON LOT 22, BLOCK 30, ~CO BEACH
See Pages ~_/~.~-- ~./~:~
Ite~#16&7g
I~B~OLIFTXON 91--578 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF
T~ ~T~NT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON TH~ SOUTH 125 FEET OF THE WEST 230
~ OF T~H NORTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
~ 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, LESS THE
K~ST SO FE~T FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, RAMON CASTRO AND ROSA CASTRO AND
~CILIAANZUALD& OWNERS
Pages
,ee 000,,,. .i77
Page 45
September 10, lg91
91--579 FROVIDING FOR ~SBE$SI~NT OF LIEN, FOR TH~ COST OF
PUBLIC NUISANCN ON LOT 29, BLOCK 218, H&RCO BEACH
~OL~I~ 91--580 ~IDI~ ~R ASSESS~ 0F ~IZH, FOR ~Z OOST O~
~ ~~ OF ~LIO ~IS~OK ON ~OT 22, B~OOK 341, ~00 BKAOH
~ ~r ~~ E~I~A~ ~ OASIMIRO ~RS
Itu~16&73
-~~ 91~81 ~OVIDIN~ ~R ASSZS~ OF ~IZH, FOR THZ OOST OF
~ ~~ OF ~LIO ~IS~OK ON LOT l~, ~5~K 218, ~00 B~OH
~T ~r ~~ KS~A ~ MI~A KS~A O~RS
See Pages
~JLK~3LUT~OM 91-582 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 35, BLOCK 13, NAPLES MANOR
~'-TI~ FA~"I CORPORATIONt L. MICHAEL KAYEt REGISTNRHD AGENT
See Pages
91--589 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT 0F LIEN, FOR THE COST 0F
OF'PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOTS 8 AND 9, BLOCK 13, NAPLES
%FILLIAM P. FENELONt JR.r OWNER
See Pages
Ita ~J'!6ATR
.R~SOL~fION 91--584 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
THE AB~~ OF PUBLIC NUISANCE BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
THE S~ QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP
4?, SOUTH RANfiN 29 EAST, RUN SOUTH A DISTANCE 660 FEET, AND THEN RUN
NEST & DISTANCE OF 130 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS PARCEL
OF LAND. PROM THIS BEGINNING POINT, RUN WEST A DISTANCE OF 168.5
FEET, THEN RUN SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 180.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING (PARCEL 44)~ ARCBILLE FILS AND RUBY FIL~~ OWNERS
See Page 3 o
']I:~SOLIJTZOJ~91-BS5 PROVIDING FOR ASSKSS3[KNT OF LIKN, FOR TH~ COST OF
~HE ABJi~ OF LM~B~IC NUISANCK BNGINNING AT TEE NO~ CO!tRKR OF
TIEIE-~ (~JA~TKR OF THE SOOTHK&ST QUARTKR OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP
47, ~T~uMI~ 2~ EAST, RUN SOUTH A DISTANCE 660 FEET, AND THEN RUN
WEb'T · D~TANC~ OF 130 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS PARCEL
OF LA~D. ~ THIS BEGINNING POINT, RUN WEST A DISTANCE OF 168.5
FEET, ~ RUN SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 180.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF
5NGI~N~ (PARCEL 51)~ ARCHILLE FILS AND RUBY FILS, OWNERS
See Pages
': Iteu,#16A?o
178
Page 46
September 10, 1991
;.J~S~~-91--88S PROV/DING FOR ASSESSMENT 0F LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
.~'"~'TH~'*~T~T OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 18 OF TH~ PIN~ GROV~
:'%}:'~~I~I'OF*TEH TOWN OF I!~K)KALItE, FLORIDA, IMMOKALEE LODGE NO.
F~ &-A.M.
*. See Pages
FROVIDING FOR &SSEZSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THH COST OF
TH~-~T~B'F OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 7, BLOCK 115, MARCO BEACH
See Pages
-.---R~)~I~ 91-686 PROVIDING FOR A~SE$~lqT 0F LIEN, FOR TH~ COST OF
.... TH~ m~mT~ENT OF ~LIC ~I~Cl ON LOT 27, BLOCK A,
,. ~~I~r ~B~ LEE ~ ~G~ LEE
· 'Ires #16ATr
See Pages
R~OL~SEIOII 61-569 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
":TH~ ~T~M~T OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 9, BLOCK 311, MARCO BEACH
' ~!IIT Nll~ M~IH L~ OWNER
See Pages C~3P" O~ ~
.'? '.Ira .d~16&70
~ "i~i'.:R~YL~T~O~.*91-590 PROVIDING ~R ~SKSS~ OF LI~, FOR ~ COST OF
i?::.,-~-~~ OF ~LIC ~IS~CE ON LOT ~, BLOCK 352, ~CO B~CH
.-~-.~, ~ ~IA ~ISKS, LEON~ J. B~I, ~GIS~D
See Pages
'~J~OLIFf~0~I 91-591 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
~ ~ OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 28, BLOCK 779, OF A REPLAT OF
..... PORTIO~IOFI~iItCO BEACH UNIT TWENTY-FIVE, ALOYSIUS J. NONDORF OWNER
See Pages ~
RRSOL~TIOII 91-592 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THR COST OF
'*TH~ a~aT~[U~IT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 27, BLOCK 779, OF A RRPLAT OF
& PORTION OF MARCO BEACH UNIT TW~I~-FIVEr ALOYSIUS J. NONDORF OWNER
· Item d~16&7v
R~$OLUTION 91-593 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
.TR~ ~ OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 19, BLOCK 326, OF MARCO BEACH
U!IITT~!I~ JOSEF OB~RT OWNER
See Pages
91--694 PROVIDING FOR ASSESS~ OF LIEN, FOR ~K COST OF
~~ OF ~LIC ~IS~CE ON LOT 12, BLOCK 135, ~IT 4 P~T --
~f ~~ J. ~ JOiA M. ~I~IVILLH ~RS
Page 47
September 10, 1991
91--598 FROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR TH~ COST OF
TI~ ~ OF PUBLIC NUISANCg ON LOT 23, BLOCK 782, REPLAT OF A
.PORTI~ OF MAR~O BEACH UNIT ELEVEN, JOSE A. SALAVERRIA AND ORA BORJA
See Pages ~
91-596 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
AB~T~MHffT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 8, BL~K 109, ~CO B~CH ~IT
See Pages ~'~_~' ~',~
91--597 ~DING ~R ~SES~ 0F LIEN, FOR ~ COST 0F
~~ OF ~LIC ~I$~CE ON L~ 26, BL~K I, ~KRSON
~DITION~ ~ES E ~ELER ~ ELI~E~ A. ~ELER O~RS
-9~--598 ~O~DING ~R ~SESS~ OF LIEN, FOR ~ COST OF
~~ OF ~LIC ~IS~CE 0N LOT 407, RIVIE~ GOLF ESTATES ~IT
9~-S99 ~OVIDIN~ FOR ~SESS~ OF LIEN, FOR T~ COST OF
~~ OF ~LIC ~IS~CE 0N LOT 4~, RIVIK~ GOLF KSTATES ~IT
~6A7cc
91--600 ~O~IDIN~ ~R ASSKSS~ OF LI~, ~R ~ COST 0F
~~ ~ ~LIC ~IS~CK ON ~OT 435, RIVIK~ GOLF KSTATKS ~IT
~~ ~ & D~L0~ CO~TIONf
See Pages _~/"" (~ &~
- ': ~ 'l:t~' ~,16ATdd
~':':~T~:01--601 PROVIDING ~R ASSKS~ 0F LIEN, FOR ~ COST 0F
eF ~LIC ~CE 0N LOT 468, RIVIER GOLF ESTA~S ~IT
.~ ~_~ ~n~ & D~0~ CO~TION, ~R
See Pages ~' ~ '" ~~
91--602 ~OVIDIN~ ~R ~SKSS~ OF LIEN, ~R ~ COST OF
~~ OF ~LIC ~IS~CE ~ L~ 405, RIVIE~ GOLF ESTA~S ~IT
~A~ ~ & D~EL0~ CO~TION, ~R
See Pages ~~' ~ ~&
Page 48
PttOVIDING FOR ASSESSI~q~T OF LIEN, FOR TH~ COST OF
-,T~-&B~BT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 83, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
"'P/ILM~TO Dq]~g~ ~'rlog, A. PAUL ~qKGG, TRUSTEE
September 10, 1991
"!g~OLlITIO][' t1'404 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSNENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
T~ ~B~I'B~[T OF POBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 121, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
' PIkLM~'TO'DqY]~ ~CTIONr A. PAUL GR~GGf TRUSTEE
R~TI~ 01--605 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSNE~T 0F LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
T]~ ~Blt~ OF ~LIC ~8~C~ 0N LOT 120, LELY CO~Y CLUB,
P~ ~ SE~ZON~ A. PA~ G~GG~ ~USTEE
See Pages ~ ~/-- ~~
01--~O6 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSNI~NT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
· ~ :-T~ ~ OF ~IC ~IS~CE 0N LOT 119, LELY CO~ CL~,
.... P~ ~ ~ON, A. PA~ ~GG, ~USTEE
~ ~~8 ~1~07 ~OVIDZNG ~R ~S~S~ OF LIEN, FOR ~ COST OF
:'~: ~'~ OF ~LIC ~I8~CE ON LOT 114, LELY CO~ CL~,
.... : P~'~ ~ZONr A. PA~ G~GGr ~USTEK
.-~OI~FfIS~ 01--608 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
' 'P~ ~S S~ZONf A. PA~ ~GG, ~USTKE
Itss #IU711
R~BOLUTION 01-609 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
TI~ ]kB~I*~EIrT OF ~LIC ~IS~C~ ON LOT 112, LELY CO~ CL~,
P~ ~S SK~ZONr. A. PA~ GRKGGf ~USTEE
See ~ages
Zt~ d~l 6A. Tum
RI,~OLOTIOJJ 01--610 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
TR~ ~B~I'~i~BT OF ~LIC ~ISANCE ON LOT ~06, LELY COU~Y CLUB,
P~ ~ SK~IONf , A. PA~ G~Gf ~USTEE
.... -BISOLUTIffO~611 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
~ OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 102, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
.... PII~-D~11~ ~CTION, A. PAUL GRKGGf TRUSTEE
Page 49
See Pages
September 10, 1991
~!:~O~UT/O~ 91-~12 PROVIDING FOR &SSESSMERT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
.: T~ ~,"I'~ OF FUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 101, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
P&LMrI'FO DOWES SECTION, A. PAUL GREGG, TRUSTEE
.... ~.~LUT~O~ 01--613 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
~'~' T~H ~ABAT~T OF FUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 100, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
PAL!~I~)-D~N~& $ECTIONt A. PAUL GREGGr THUSTEE
Xte~ -~l%A?qq
RH~oL~r~4~-91--61& PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
.-TH~ ~BdLTBMEFr OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 93, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
'~*'PAF2~I~I~ ~ $ECTIOR t A. PAUL GREGG r TRUSTEE
"RBSOLUT~OI O1--616 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
.~.: ~ ~~ ~ ~LIC EISUCK ON LOT 91, LELY C0~Y
· ~' P~ ~S SK~IOR~ A. PA~ G~GG~ TRUSTEE
~*:- 'Ite~#16A700
RKSOLUT~OI 91-616 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
*TH~ AB&T~MEIrT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 82, LEtY COUNTRY CLUB,
PALMrrTO IXJNKS SECTIONf A. PAUL GRKGG~ TRUSTEE
~:~--~~~' 91-617 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
~' THE ABiT~MB3FF OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 77, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
PALMETTO Dq~FA~ SECTION ~ A. PAUL GREGG f TRUSTEE
See Pages ~F,~--.,. g:~l~
Zt~i ',l&A?u
':~I' ~1-611 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
.... T~ A~IT~T OF FUBLZC NUISANCE ON LOT 38, LELY CO~ CLUB,
P~ ~ ~IONf A. PA~ ~GGr ~USTKK
See Pages ~' ~~
91-619 PROVIDING FOR &SSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
~T~T OF FUBLZC NUISANCE OR LOT 37, LELY CO~Y CLUB,
~S SK~ZONf A. PA~ G~GGf TRUSTEE
See Pages ~ ~~~
Ite~ #l~JkTw~
Septmiber 10, 1991
FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
OF FUBLZC NUISANCE ON LOT :35, LELY GOLF COUNTRY CLUB,
· ~CTION, &. PAUL G. REGGf TRUSTEE
See Pages
~ ..-JEI~OLUTZOJI-~I--621 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
~TH~"&BJkTEM~IT OF P~BLZC NU/SANCE ON LOT 34, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
~:,"-- P~ER~J~K~ S~OTZONL A. PAUL GREGGL THUSTEE
See Pages
.lteu.#lSATyy
~R~SOL4JTION91-622 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
TI~ ~I'~T OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 33, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
PALMETTO D~NKS $ECTION~ A. PAUL GI~GG~ TRUSTHE
*.. Zte~ #16&7zz
'JLESOLUT/ON 91-~23 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
:'TH~ ~ OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 32, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
-PALMrFTo ~ SECTION A. PAUL GRKGGx TRUSTEE
See Pages ~
::~:'*ltml d~16&7m
01--624 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
TH~B&TBJI~BrT OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 31, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
DUNKS SNCTION A. PAUL GREGG TRUSTEE
See Pages ~
lteu*#16&TDbb
JLK~OLUTXOBI 91--625 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
THI.AB&TB~BrT OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 29, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
' PJLLMHTTO~ SKCTIONL A. PAUL GRKGG~ TRUSTEE
See Pages ~
Item #16&Tccc
RKSOLUTI~ 91-626 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
THE AB&TEMKMT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 28, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
PAI~'TO IW}I{ES SECTION A. PAUL GREGGc TRUSTEE
See Pages ~
Item ~lSJk7ddd
RI~OLUTZON 91-627 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
**TffB AB&T~KNT OF P~BLIC NUISANCE ON LOT 27, LELY COUNTRY CLUB,
~*., PA__T~/KTTODUNKS SECTIONL A PAUL GRKGG~ TRUSTEE
. ,N~OLI~rI~ 01-620 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
TM~' AB&TBI~;BIT OF ~LZC ~IS~CK 0N LOT 26, LELY CO~ CL~,
Page 51
September 10, 1991
See Pages
R~SOLUTIO~ 91-629 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN, FOR THE COST OF
TH~ ~B~T~F OF FUBLIC NUISANCE 0N LOT 25, L~LY CO~Y CLUB,
p~ ~ S~ION~ A. PA~ G~GG~ TRUSTEE
91--630 GRANTING PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY,
-~.K~k~:~WATER, ~ SEWER I~O~S ~R ~A ~RTION OF E~~ WAY
.~ ~m -- ~ STI~TIONS
Accept the Irrevocable Letter of Credit (posted with the
Clerk) as security for maintenance of the infrastructure
until the Board of County Commissioners grants final accep-
tance of all improvements.
Preliminary acceptance of improvements will not become effec-
tive until water and sewer facilities have been conveyed to
Collier County Water-Sewer District.
See Pages ~/
'Xtra ~1~9
(;~M~'~I~TA~ICH OF MAT~R AND SE~ER FACILITIES FOR VILLAGES OF WYNDEMERE -
The water and sewer facilities to serve the project cannot be
placed into service and no Certificate of Occupancy shall be
issued until the Florida Department of Environmental
Regulation furnishes a letter authorizing the placement of
these systems into service.
Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements.
The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been
satisfied, and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting
the fire hydrant for ownership and maintenance.
OR Book /~,~ Pages /~ --/7a~
BID ~91--17~O, FOR LIBRARY SE&TING AT THE NEW LIBRARY HEADQUARTERS - TO
'~OLUT~, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $65,217
Deleted
LIBRARY SHELVING AT THE NEW LIBRARY HEadQUARTERS TO
R_~tlD
91--631 ESTABLISHING NEW PAY TITLES FOR AN AFFORDABLE
.~O~I~DIIE~CTOR AND HOUSING PROGRAMS ANALYST, AND DELETING HOUSING
DIPltOV~M~NT DIRECTOR PAY TITLE
Page
September 10, 1991
$ OFEI~/TIRG BUDGET TO FUND PROJECTED
~ mm ~m~ (49o)
~ 11~:~:)~lF~iol 91-~2, ESTABlISHIng TH'g TERM~ O~ 0FFIC~ FOR THE ELEVEN · /~:N~:~ O~TH~ ~]~V/RORI~K]ITJLT~ POLICY TECHNICAL ADVISORY BOARD
See Pag,s33 .
~IC~S AGREEIRENT - P~SE I NITH ~ST, BUC~, SC~
I~O. ~R ~ COLLIER ~0~ L~FILL CLOS~ PRO~CT NOT
500
~ ~ I~T~TION OF ~ PELIC~ ~Y RI~F-WAY
~ ~R FISC~ ~ ~991 - ~ O'~LL ~C~IN~ FOR
~ ~ ~ 803 .
"~][~'I~,T~'~ I~O~k'/~ NO'S. 60310. 42510. 45138. 73508. 70700.
55097
· : .....~ C~]~A~JPORD~]ICE - FILED ~ O/RREF~]~RED
The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and/or
(?referred to the various departments as indicated below:
1. Letter dated 8/27/91 to Florida Department of Law Enforcement
from Susan M. Usher, CPA, Senior Account/Deputy Clerk,
Clerk of the Circuit Court, with attached quarterly report of
activity within the Confiscated Property Trust Fund. xc:
Nell Dotrill, BCC and filed.
Letter dated 8/23/91 to Commissioner Goodnight from Dallas
Townsend, Kevin U. Hill and Audrey B. Johnson, Cooperative
Extension Services, Institute of Food and Agricultural
Sciences, re the horses purchased by Elaine Leslie. xc:
Filed.
Letter dated 8/22/91 to Chairman Goodnight from John R. Hall,
Chief, Regulatory Division, Department of the Army, re the
Livingston Road permit application. xc: BCC, Nell Dotrill,
George Archibald and filed.
Letter dated 8/28/91 to Chairman from Ronald Davls, Chief,
Bureau of Housing, Department of Community Affair, re
Community Development Block Grant, Contract
#90DB-49-O9-21-O1-H05. xc: Nell Dotrill, BCC, Russell
Shreeve and filed.
-Letter dated 8/23/91 to Chairman Goodnight from Carol M.
Browner, Secretary, Department of Environmental Regulation,
Page 53
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
September 10, 1991
re Solid Waste RecyclinG and Education Grant. xc: Nell
Dotrill, Bob Fahey and filed.
Memo dated 8/21/91 to Interested Parties from Don W.
Berryhill, P.E., Chief, Bureau of Local Government Wastewater
Financial Assistance, Department of Environmental Regulation,
re State Revolving Fund Loan Program Rule, Chapter 17-503,
Florida Administrative Code, xc: Nell Dorrlll, Mike Arnold,
Bill Lorenz and filed.
Memo dated 8/23/91 to BCC Chairman from Roger B. Twitchell,
Health Services and Facilities Consultant Supervisor Program
Development and Coordination, Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services, re Notice of Deadline for Submission
of 1991 Emergency Medical Services (EMS) County Grant
Applications. xc: Nell Dotrill, Jay Reardon and filed.
CC of letter dated 8/26/91 to Richard P. and Sandra Evans
Kundractk, from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal
EngineerinG and Regulation, Department of Natural Resources,
re Notice to Proceed Withheld, Permit Number C0-279. xc:
Nell Dotrill, Frank Brutt and filed.
Letter dated 8/23/91 to BCC, from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer,
Bureau of Coastal EngineerinG and Regulation, Department of
Natural Resources, re Request for Public Comment, File
Number: C0-336, Applicant: G. Stuart and Ann H. Wood. xc:
Nell Dotrill, Frank Brutt, Bill Lorenz and filed.
Minutes Received and Filed:
PlanninG Commission AGenda of 9/5/19, minutes of 7/11/91
and 7/18/91.
B. Water Management Advisory Board AGenda of 9/11/91.
South Florida Water Management District AGenda for
9/6/91.
Do
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board AGenda of 8/28/91
and minutes of 7/24/91.
Notice of Non-Payment dated 8/26/91 to Harper Brothers, from
Patent ScaffoldinG Company, re contract with Liquid
Technology for furnishing scaffoldinG related materials,
hauling services and labor on 6/14/91 for the Davis Road Box
Culvert. xc: Neil Dotrill, John Yonkosky, Steve Camell and
filed.
Notice To Owner to Board of County Commissioners dated
8/26/91 from Dave Partridge Carpentry, Inc., advising that
they have furnished services or materials as per the written
contract for the Community Centers at Immokalee, East Naples
a~d North Naples Community Parks, under an order Given by
Cornerstone General Contractors, Inc. xc: Nell Dorrill,
Steve Camell, John Yonkosk¥ and filed.
Letter to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/28/91 from
Jack E. Buell, National Association of Credit Management, re
Notice to Owner re Commercial Improvements Inc. that was sent
in error and hereby retracts same. xc: Nell Dorrill, John
Yonkosky, Steve Camell and filed.
Memo to Board of County Commissioners dated 8/26/91 from
Sheriff Don Hunter, re Sheriff's Confiscation Trust Fund
Second Quarterly Report - 1991 (Corrected Copy). xc: Nell
Dotrill and filed.
Page 5,
September 10, 1991
Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Class
Representation, Case No. 88-2173, re Tactmark, Ltd., a
foreign corporation, and Philip O'Connor. xc: Ken Cuyler
and filed.
~ TO THH CONPISCATHD T~UST FUND (602) IN THH AMOUNT OF
~>~;~1;6~4)~T~ ~HASE OF AN UNDERWATER METAL DETECTOR
Xte~e16F~
~- ~~TO~IZE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EMERGENCY ~DIC~ SERVICES
. ~~ ~ ~ AW~ED FOR DISPATCHER T~INING IN ~ ~0~ OF
:0~1 OF LIEN FILED AGAINST REAL PROPERTY FOR ABATEMENT OF
~ .~r~X~,{~MAE~ ~ ~ NIDIA CRUZ, C~NCING AT ~ SO--ST
"~-OP'~ SH 1/4 OF ~ ~ 1/4 OF ~K ~ 1/4 OF SE~ION 33,
~P 46 SO~, ~GE 29 ~ST, COLLIER CO~, ~ORIDA
See Pages ~ ~
'~TXSFACTXON OF LIEN FILED AGAINST REAL PROPERTY FOR ABATEMENT OF
~ ~I$~ ~~ A. B~S~ LOT 27~ BLOCK 242~ ~CO B~CH ~IT 6
~ See Pages ~
~A~O~ O~ LI~ FILED AGAINST ~L PROPER~ FOR ~T~ OF
- ~IS~, ~ J. LI$~ LOT 8~ BL~K 333 OF ~CO B~CH ~IT TEN
· ATX~TI~N OF LIEN FILED AGAINST REAL PROPERTY FOR ABATEMENT OF
'~X~,-PATRICIA A. SCHULTZ, TRUSTEE AND CAROLE H. DANIKLS, TRUSTEE
OF T~-~T~ J. SPOLINSKI TRUST, LOT 22 BLOCK 208 UNIT 6 PART 1
~LDEN~ATH
See Pages
~ATX~A~TXON OF LIEN FILED AGAINST REAL PROPERTY FOR ABATEMENT OF
P.J. DE ~ROOT AND M.E. DE GROOT WER]TER, LOT 12, BLOCK 23,
UNIT ON~
See Pages
~.B~M~TJ~]~M~T TRaNSFErRING $1,700 FROM SALARIES AND BENEFITS TO
· ;?.~~OP~RATING CAPITAL OUTLAY TO PROVIDE MATCHING FUNDS FOR
IFIMIT* eO!--.cJ-2 8-o9-21--01--036
There being no further business for the Good of the County, the
;me~ting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 5:25 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF
SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS
CONTROL
Page 55
September 10, 1991
Page 56