Loading...
BCC Minutes 10/29/1991 R Naples, Florida, October 29, 1991 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted buslness herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Patricia Anne Goodnight VICE-CHAIRMAN: Michael 3. Volpe Richard S. Shanahan Max A. Hasse, Jr. Burr L. Saunders ALSO PRESENT: James C. Giles, Clerk, 3ohn Yonkosky, Finance Director; Ellie Hoffman, Annette Guevin, Debby Farris, and Wanda Arrtght, Deputy Clerks; Nell Dotrill, County Manager; Tom Olliff, Assistant to the County Manager; Davld Weigel and Ramitc Manalich, Assistant County Attorneys; Frank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator; John Boldt, Water Management Director; Bill Lorenz, Environmental Services Administrator; Jay Reardon, Emergency Services Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Mike Arnold, Utilities Administrator; Fred Bloetscher, Assistant Utilities Administrator; John MadaJewski, Project Review Services Manager; Stan Litsinger, Growth Management Director; Martha Skinner, Acting Public Services Administrator; Murdo Smith, Acting Parks and Recreation Director; Bob Fahey, Solid Waste Management Director; Tom Conrecode, Office Df Capital Projects Management Director; Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the Board; Deputies Byron Tomllnson and Mike Koors, Sheriff's Office. Page October 29, ~991 Tara #1 AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA - APPROVED WITH CHANGES Cootsstoner Shanahen moved, seconded by Copiestoner Basse and carried unanimously, that the agenda and consent agenda be approved with the following changes: Item #9A - Recommendation to correct a scrivener's error on the newly adopted Commission District Maps - Added. (Requested by County Attorney). Item #10C - Request to waive permit fees for Paradise Games - Added. (Requested by Commissioner Goodnight). Item #16C4 Moved to #801 - Recommendation for approval of agreement for the 1991-92 funding contribution to St. Matthew's House. (Requested by the Commission). Item #16D2 Moved to #8D1 - Recommendation to rescind the award of Bid #91-1730 to Broward Testing Laboratory and award the bid to Geos, Inc. (Requested by the Commission). Item #16H6 Moved to #8H4 - Approval of and permission for Chairman to sign contract for architectural and engineering services for additions to the Collier North, Golden Gate and Immokalee Branch Libraries. (Requested by the Commission). Item #16H3 Moved to #8H3 - Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners terminate the contract for right-of-way landscape service with RB Lawn Service for the Pelican Bay CommuniSty and waive formal competitive bidding requirements and provide authorization to enter into a month-to-month contract with Land Design Systems, Inc. to continue the right-of-way landscaping service for the Pelican Bay Community. (Requested by Staff). Item #16D1 - Selection of Consultants for 1992 Capital Projects - Continued to 11/19/91. (Requested by Staff). Item #16H4 - Recommendation that the BCC approve Work Authorization #34 reflecting revised hourly rate codes for Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek; Approve Work Authorizations for engineering services for Projects Unit 17, Connector Road B and renewal of South Florida Water Management District Wellfield Water Use Permit - Continued, No Date Certain. (Requested by Staff). Item #3B C0NS~NT AGENDA - &PPROVKD AND/OR ADOPTED The motion for approval of the Consent Agenda is noted under Item #16. Item #4 BOC MINUTES OF AUGUST 13, 1991 REGULAR, AUGUST 14, 1991 BUDGET WORESHOP AND AUGUST 14, 1991 SPECIAL M~ETINGS - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Commissioner Shmnmhan moved, seconded by Commissioner Hesse and carried unanimously, that the BCC minutes of the Regular meeting of October 2g, 1991 A~g~st 13, Budget Workshop of August 14 and Special meeting of August 1991, be approved as presented. lt~ #~A ~!Fr_~o~&~ SERVICE AMARD$ - PRESEIFFED Commissioner Saunders presented Employee Service Awards to the following Collier County employees: Mary A. Mehlmouer - Library/Downtown Branch 10 years Robert Leglet - Parks and Recreation 5 years Stan Litsinger, Jr. - Growth Management 5 years Item ~5B1 PROCLAPJ~TION DESIGNATING THE WEEK OF NOVEMBER 10-16, 1991, AS VOICE OF DEMOCRACY WEEK IN VFW POST 8089 - ADOPTED Upon reading of the proclamation, Cometsstoner Volpe moved, seconded by Commissioner Shanahen and carried unanimously, to adopt the Proclmtlon designating the week of November 10-16, 1991, as the Voice of Democracy Week in VFW Post 8089. Julia Longwell and Nettie Hathaway accepted the proclamation on behalf of the VFW. Ms. Longwell presented certificates of appreciation to Commissioner Shanahah and Assistant County Manager McLemore (County Manager Derrill accepted on behalf of Mr. McLemore), for assisting the VFW in obtaining the needed funds for the Gulfcoast Little League All Star Team to travel to Lehigh Acres in June. Page 3 October 29, 1991 Upon reading of the proclamation, Coauafssioner Haese moved, ~conded b~ Co~aiseloner $hanal~ and carried unanimously, that the l~oclmt~on d~elgnating N~em~r ~l-17, 1991, me Youth Appreciation ~k~ ~pt~. Co~lsstoner Hasse announced that he wi]l present the proclamation to the Sunset Optimist Club at their meeting this week. Page 4 October 29, 1991 PROCLAI~ATZON DZSZGNATING OCTOBER 29, 1991, AS KEN~3(BRANCE DAY FOR MAJOR CLAYTON A. R~ID AND MAJOR JAN~$ NA~S - ADOPTED Upon reading of the proclamation, Commissioner $har~han moved, second~t by Commissioner Huee and carried unanimously, that the Proclamation deet~nattn~ Octol>er 29, 1991 as Remembrance Day for Major Cla~on I. Reid ~d ~Jor J~s Matthews ~ adopted. Mrs. Carol Matthews, wife of Major James Matthews was presented the proclamation and a plaque from Co~isstoner Shanahen. Civil Air Patrol Deputy Colander, Monty Lazarus, in the absence of Mrs. Reid, accepted the proclamation and a plaque from Commissioner Shanahah. Co~tsstoner Shanahen recognized Captain Jim Love, Civil Air Patrol Co~untcattons Officer, who was aboard the plane that spotted the do~ed patrol durln9 a routine mission three weeks after Majors Reid and Matthews aircraft went down. Page 5 October 29, 1991 Zt~ ~A! - 6A3 ~ AMENDgiaNTS 91-442; 92-5 RE BUILDING "B" RENOVATION (A PORTION ADOPTED); 92-6/92-9 - ADOPTED Finance Director Yonkosk¥ requested that the Commission adopt six Budget Amendments. He advised that one budget amendment reflects the last fiscal year and the other five relate to the current fiscal year. Commissioner Volpe called attention to Budget Amendment Request 92-5, Facilities Management Fund 301 and requested an update on Building "B" Renovation Capital Outlay in the amount of $530,000. Facilities Management Project Manager Bert Karpinski advised that bids were received for this project and the low bidder was Haas Construction with a base bid of $544,500. He stated that the work entails the relocation of the Human Resources Department: relocation of the snack bar; and an outside dining facility. Couisstoner Volpe remarked that certain capital projects have been deferred due to budgetary constraints. He noted that Fund 301 ~s the source of funding those capital projects related to concurrency. He questioned the timing of this expenditure since there are other more pressing capital improvement projects. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Karpinskl replied that Building "B" encompasses 9,715 square feet, however, deleting the space for the mechanical room, results in the building being 8,340 square feet. Commissioner Volpe related that he also has concerns with regard to the fire suppression system for this building. County Manager Dotrill announced that he shares some of the same concerns relative to the current cost of renovations to this building. He lndlcated that this is a housekeeping budget item, and noted that he sees no problem approving same. Commissioner Volpe cited non support of this budget amendment since he has reservations about this particular project. It was the consensus of the Commission to separate out Budget Amendment 92-5. Page 6 October 29, 1991 Finance Director Yonkosky announced that there is $19,000 outstanding on a purchase order remaining In the architect's contract, and requested that the outstanding amount be approved for payment. Comisstoner Saunders moved, seconded by 0o~aisstoner Shanahen and carried unanimously, that Budget Amendments 91-441; 92/8 ($19,000 of the $630,000 approved); and 92-6/92-9 be adopted. Comtestoner Saunders aoved, seconded by ¢om~tsaloner Shanahen and carried 4/1 (Coatsstoner Volpe opposed), that the remaining $611,000 of Budget Amendment 91-5 be ~dopted via a paper transaction only, by ~ovtn~ tJ~ ~on~y from one fund to ~nother. FRII~i~IN ~ ~D JOHN CONI~LLY R~ A~I~NT BXT~XN WHISPXRING PII~S ~ COLLIER COUNTY - CONC~FT OF P~NOVING FILL FROM $ITX WITHIN SIX I~ONTH$ 11~vFROVED Attorney Frank Baker requested that the Commission consider a change in the agreement between his client, Whispering Pines and Collier County. He asked that fill be allowed to be removed from the Imperial Golf Estates Phase V site. He noted that the fill is currently located on an offsite parcel of property and was originally anticipated to be sold to the County for the Livingston Road Pro3ect. He indicated that unfortunately, that Pro3ect is in limbo and requested that his client be allowed to sell the fill to a private party for use at a School Board site. Mr. Baker advised that the necessary bonds have been posted, a ~11ard has been employed to man the gate to ensure that heavy truck traffic flows only at certain hours, and a bond has been placed with the Department of Transportation for any damage that may be done to any roads during the movement of the fill. Commissioner Hasse questioned whether the County no longer has need for this fill. Project Review Services Manager Madajewski replied that the County would like to have the fill, under the origi- nal agreement, if the Livingston Road Project was moving forward, but noted that the developer is basically stuck with the material offsite on property that could have development rights and there is a problem Page 7 October 29, 1991 hainraining the fill. He revealed that under development excavation, a maximum of 20,000 yards of fill may be removed offsite to sell. He remarked that under the circumstances, staff has no objection to Mr. Baker's request. Commissioner Saunders stated that he believes that the facts are relatively unique in this case since the County agreed to purchase the material but it appears that it may be another four years before any fill is needed for the Livingston Road Project. Comtmmioner manndare ~ov~, ~econded by Coalsstoner Volpe to approve in concept, the ra~oval of the fill, am requested. Commissioner Volpe questioned the period of time in which the would be removed. Mr. Baker replied that he believes that the fill would be removed over the next four to six months. Transportation Services Administrator Archibald advised that the contract of November, 1990 was approved by the Commission with stipu- lations, one of which involved the Chairman not executing that docu- ment until such time that permits were received for Livingston Road. He noted in essence, the County has approved the contract but withheld execution of same. Attorney Baker concurred with Mr. Archibald, and noted that it was made very clear that this was an agreement to enter into an agreement. Upon call for the question, the ~otton carried unanimously. Itel ~B EHOSRO~ ~O~AVENI RKPRESENTIN~ ~F~ OONDOMINIUMS, R~QUESTING EXTENSION OF PENMIT NO. 90-1118 - ONE YEA]~ EXY'ENSION APPROVED Community Development Services Administrator Brutt stated that Ordinance 90-75 indicates that a building permit is good for six months and an applicant may request two three month extensions, granted by the Building Official. He remarked that in order for a permit to be extended beyond that time, a written request needs to be forwarded to him and then a hearing is scheduled before the Board. Mr. Brutt advised that the applicant has selected a contracting organization, has met with two banks and is diligently proceeding and Page October 29, 1991 Ls requesting a one year extension. He indicated that staff is recom- mending that a one year extension be granted. Coeuatsaloner Saunders ~ovsd, seconded by GoBtastoner Shanahah to exte~ Pemtt No. 90-1118 ~or G~ Condoaln]~ for one year. In response to Co~tssioner Volpe, Mr. Brutt replied that two $500 extension ~ees have been collected and an additional $500 fee will be collected fo~ this extension of the permit. Co~issioner Volpe ~ema~ked that this building permit is two yea~s old, notlng that staff is in the p~ocess of changing the Unified Land Development ~e~lattons. He indicated that the~e a~e exemptions p~o- vtded and time ~ames have been placed on the development orders. He ~estioned whethe~ extending this pe~mtt would ~esult 1n any incon- sistency wlth the o~dlnance that is to be adopted. Assistant County Attorney Welgel advised that the Sections in the Building Permit O~dlnance ~elatlng to extensions is no direct 1tnAaGe to the Land Development Code and the standards imposed upon same. ~n call for the ~emtlon, the ~tton carried Item Community Development Services Administrator Brutt reported that this Item is an appeal of Lien Resolution 91-573. He explained that he appeared before the Commission last year relative to the same pro- perty and the same circumstances. Mr. Brutt Indicated that the notification which is sent to a pro- perty owner must utilize the legal address on file with the Tax Appraiser. He divulged that a certified letter was sent to the pro- perty owner indicating that the growth on the lot was above the required maximum. He stated that the letter was sent to the property owner's address in Maryland. Mr. Brutt remarked that Ms. Balcerzak stated that although the certified letter was sent to her address, she did not go the post office for one reason or another to pick up that letter. He announced Page 9 October 29, 1991 that three notices are on file requesting that Ms. Balcerzak pick up the notices but since she failed to comply, the Post Master returned the notice to staff. Mr. Brutt stated that correspondence between Development Services and Ms. Balcerzak was delivered via first class mail to her street address, received and resulted in the correspondence which has taken place. Mr. Brutt related that Ms. Balcerzak has not paid the charges to clear her lot, plus the administrative costs and staff is recommending that the Commission support its previous action on September loth when the Lien Resolution was adopted. In response to Commissioner Hesse, Mr. Brutt explained that Ms. Balcerzak has communicated with the Clerk's Office to appeal the lien which was placed on her property. Mr. Brutt advised that if the Commission upholds the action of September 10, 1991, adopting the Lien Resolution, Ms. Balcerzak owes the County $245. He noted if this amount is not paid, staff would go through the normal lien procedures. He indicated that last year the Board recommended that the property owner pay the amount due to the County and payment was received which resolved that issue. Com~lllioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe to ~oJd st&ffts recognition, ~t re~cing the &~lnJstratJve coets from $200 to $100; ~ud th&t staff for~e&rd m letter via regular mmil to t~e prop~r~ o~mar &dvlslng off ~ ~d t~t the Co~t~ ~11 not ~ve ~ ~th~ for her next veer i~ the ~ue eit~tJon ochre, Assistant County Attorney Wetgel stated that it would be app~opriate for Resolution 91-573 to be rescinded and that a new Resolutlon be adopted indicating the change. Co. Sll$onlr Sl~derm m~d his lotion to Include that the ~c~ ~r ~rk ~ preyed ~ the Co~ty Attorney's Office, t~t ~lutl~ 9~-573 ~ rescinded ~d that Resolution 91-?51 ~ adopted. Cmissio~r Vol~ accept~ the ~n~nt, ~d the ~tton c~rled ~a- hilly. **~**NOTE: RESOLUTION 91~751 NOT RECEIVED AS OF 6/15/92w~*~e Page 10 October 29, 199! Zt~ ~G2 COST O~ ~I~IC~ ALT.,OC&TION M~I'HODOLOGY FOR ADMINZSTI~ItTIV~, OPERATIONS, ~Z~I"~N.&~'~ ~ CAPITAL COSTS FOR THE COUNTY STOI~O~IATER PROGRA~ - Environmental Services Administrator Lorenz presented the second issue paper for the Stormwater Management Program. He indicated that Justification and needs for the program will be detailed. Mr. Lorenz explained that the methodology is a tiered approach to fairly and equitably allocate the cost of service to those individuals in the County that will benefit from same. Mr. Lorenz requested that the Commission approve the Cost of Service Table, as presented in the Master Plan, which is the basis for the costs allocated in the various tiers in the cost allocation metho- dology. He noted that currently the funding source is Fund ll0 which is Ad Valorem Taxes Gounty-Wide and a decision will need to be ren- dered to provide staff with direction as to the amount of those taxes which should be used for this program versus the service charges. In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Lorenz advised that the cost of this project is estimated to be between $55 million and $80 million for a total 20 year program. He announced that the numbers that will be presented today reflect the first § years of the service. Commissioner Saunders remarked that the City of Naples, Everglades City and Federal and State Preserves will be excluded from this program, and questioned whether it would be appropriate to assess ad valorem taxes County-wide. Mr. Lorenz announced that the program will provide for certain County-wide benefits. Water Management Director Boldt provided an overview of the Master Plan, and a slide presentation depicting examples of the County's systems, problems and flooding conditions which necessitate this program, and noted that there are 253 major projects that need to be completed. Tmpm ~2 In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Boldt indicated that impro- vements to the structures in the past have been funded by various Pag,: ! 1 October 29, 1991 components: developers, Big Cypress Basin, and Fund 110. He noted that the Big Cypress Basin has been much more aggressive than the Gount¥ has with respect to the water level control structures. Commissioner Volpe remarked that Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Immokalee Road, GR-951 and Davis Boulevard are being four-laned and each of these roadways have a canal associated with same. He questioned whether the work is being coordinated with Transportation Services. Mr. Boldt replied that the work is coordinated In some instances. He called attention to the segment of CR-9§I which has recently been four-laned. He indicated that the canal was located along the side of the road and Transportation Services moved it over as a part of their project. He explained that other projects have no relationship to the Transportation construction programs. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Boldt reported that the Gordon River Basin is deserving of an interlocal agreement with the City of Naples. He divulged that the scope of services will need to be analyzed with regard to the benefit between the two units of government so that cost could be shared. Commissioner Shanahah stated that there does not appear to be a great deal of support from the majority of the citizens to pay for stormwater control at this time. He cited concerns relative to knowing the feelings of the people regarding the methodology of paying for the utility. Mr. Boldt reported that there Is a list of capital projects totaling approximately $77 million. He indicated that he has iden- tified through the cooperative agreement with the Big Cypress Basin that they are responsible for the construction and modification of the water level control structures in the primary system which totals $10 million and minor portions of the project will be developer costs. Stormwater Utility Manager Peter Comeau provided a slide presen- tation identifying the benefit unit concept; allocation of the costs; and breakdown of administrative, operations, maintenance and CIP programs. Page 12 October 29, 1991 Mr. Comeau stated that the neighborhood unit concept is that por- tion of a designated ne~ghborhocd system located within the various Basin units. He indicated that these units would be determined on a local project basis by basis. He reported that the different benefit units would be paying a different fee each month. Mr. Comeau explained that the Urban Benefit Unit is the urban western coastal portions of the County designated as the urban resi- dential mixed use, including those portions of Golden Gate Estates lying west of the line located one mile east of CR-9§1, excluding Federal and State Preserves. Mr. Comeau stated that the Estates Benefit Unit is east of the Urban Benefit Unit and consisting primarily of Golden Gate Estates, including OrangeTree, but excludes those portions south of SR-84 and the Federal and State Preserves. Mr. Comeau reported that the East Collier Benefit Unit includes the eastern portion of the County which is primarily rural in character, includes the Immokalee area, but excludes the Federal and State Preserves. Mr. Comeau related that the Marco Benefit Unit includes Good/and, Is/es of Capri, Marco Shores, Horrs Island, but excludes those /den- tified by the Urban Benefit Unit, and Federal and State Preserves. Mr. Comeau announced that $14,112,700 is the amount of the capital programs for the next five years, noting that $5.6 million of that amount is directly related to flood protection and basin specific Improvements. He reported that administration costs are anticipated to be $2.7 million for five years; operation and maintenance $10.i million; and $1.6 million for basin engineering reports. He explained that the rates relating to a pay as you go philosophy may not be equitable to fund a five year program and consequently rates would be based on need for the first three years which incorporates 45% of the five year costs. He noted that the Commission would need to make a decision as to how to proceed, i.e. pay as you go and spread the programs out for a longer period of time, or consider bonding to acce- Page 13 October 2'), lgg~ lerate the programs. Mr. Comeau stated that the Cost of Services Table for a five year program is broken down as follows: Operation & Maintenance S4.25~; Administration 9.16~; Basin Engineering Reports §.4~; and CIP projects includ~ng basin engineerinG §l~. Mr. Gomeau advised that the Basin Engineering Reports identify capital projects and finalize basin boundaries, finalize associated costs within each basin and results in moving forward with applica- tions for regulatory permits. In addition, he remarked that a foun- dation is developed for requests for proposals for construction plans. Mr. Comeau indicated that benefit unit costs include fair share to support the program for admin~stration, operation, maintenance, and capital costs that are within specific benefit units. He noted that the final numbers will be presented to the Commission in the next Issue Paper. *** !~t'F Clark ~nevin replaced Deputy Clerk Hoffman at th~e Mr. Comeau stated the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) has $1§,192,700 for the CIP projects which includes personnel services and other charges, and the basic engineering reports totaling $1,600,O00. He sa~d the environmental associated costs for the stormwater manage- ment program have been developed on the premise of a cost allocation analysis of historical maintenance records by acreage and by actual dollars spent on maintenance activities. He explained the four-tier Cost Category Stormwater charges, specifically, "Base County-Wide Benefit Unit", "Benefit Unit", "Basin Unit" and "Neighborhood Unit". He noted the packet provided to the Board includes all the programs within the first five years, which are broken down by drainage and flood containment basin units and possible environmental issues. He commented it is important to realize that 100% of the CIP is repre- sented within the urban benefit unit and those costs have to be ascer- tained and broken down into the basin unit component and that of environmental, which would be spread either from within the benefit unit itself, among multiple benefit units or within a County-wide Page 14 October 29, 1991 relationship. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Water Management Dlrector John Boldt indicated the master plan consultant planned on a steady level of spending for the capltal program of approximately $4-5 million per year. He said they have not looked beyond a 20 year window. Mr. Comeau added the rate methodology being looked at will result in a reasonable rate he feels the public will support. He stated this report presents the concept of the benefit unit costs and he anticipa- tes returning to the Board in the next six weeks with a final presen- tation. $** Rtclllld: 11:30 A.M. - Reconvened: 11:45 A.M. Bill Lindsay, with Teach America Corporation, explained his com- pany bears the responsibility of developing and implementing the public information program for the County Stormwater Program. He men- tioned a survey was done which gathered information to determine what the public perception was of stormwater issues, what people know about those issues, how Individual property owners are being Impacted by stormwater runoff and flooding, and what perceptions and opinions were about some of the Issues involved in stormwater. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Lindsay stated the 27.5% response rate to the survey is significantly higher than what is generally received for a multi-page survey, especially one with as many questions as this survey had. He explained some of the more per- tinent items of the survey that were selected by the team of con- sultants and County Staff. Mr. Lindsay remarked the public information program began with the random sample survey in order to Gather Information. He said there are a number of other elements to be implemented as this project con- tinues. He noted the first audio public service message was delivered to the County this date to be distributed to all radio stations. He said the message addresses the most general question of why there is a stormwater problem and provides a telephone number for more Infor- mation. He indicated in conjunction with the public service message, Page 15 October 29, 1991 his company has provided the first fact sheet which details progress of the survey, why it was implemented and what property owners can expect in the future regarding public information. He advised in mid-November, a video will be developed for TV stations covering This area along with three more audio announcements and additional fact sheets. He said the centerpiece of the public information program is a sound/slide program which wl11 be presented to a variety of interest groups, civic clubs and other organizations providing more detail on the reasons for the stormwater problems, what actions are being taken to solve them and what it will mean in Terms of cost and cost alloca- tion. Commissioner Volpe commented that only 13~ of Those surveyed have had a stormwaTer problem on their property within the last five years and very few of Those experienced That problem in the past six months. He indicated although wanting to help solve Those problems, he is not sure how aggressively This program should be pursued. Commissioner Shanahah reported federal and STaTe policies will mandate a stormwater program in the near future. Water Management Director John Boldt concurred, adding that Collier County is also com~ltted by its Growth Management Plan to implement such a program, with a stormwater utility identified as the funding mechanism. In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. BoldT sTaTed when The 1990 census becomes official, Collier County will receive its mandate from the federal government. He agreed to provide the Board with The noti- fication when it is received. George Keller asked the Board to reconsider implementing a very expensive stormwater program. He suggested that the Growth Management Plan be re-analyzed to deal with the current economic conditions because, in his opinion, the Plan was formulated by people who Thought the citizens in Collier County were wealthy. Tape ~3 D, C. F~tz-Gerald, representing the ProperTy Owners of Naples Page 16 October 29, 1991 Park, stated his organization would endorse the cost vs benefit approach to a stormwater program. He said this could be a very expen- sive program, and the people in Collier County and in Naples Park are very sensitive to Increasing taxes and the cost of living in Collier County. He urged the Board to place controls on the cost of this program and asked that a very cautious approach be taken to implemen- tation. County Manager Dorrtll asked the Board to comment on the benefit unit concept, the rate consultant methodology and to what extent cost sharing with the City of Naples and other areas should be explored. Commissioner Hasse stated the expenses as well as the benefits of a stormwater program should be shared equally with the City of Naples. Commissioner Shanahah agreed that cost sharing with the Big Cypress Basin, the City of Naples and any other participants should be evaluated. He indicated the fairness and cost-to-benefit issue should be documented very clearly, as well as what citizens in the County are willing to pay for. Commissioner Saunders agreed that adequate public opinion has not been documented. He indicated this ts a very Important program and the best way to survey the public may be through a referendum. He raised the possibility of holding off the rate study until the Board makes a commitment to proceed with the project. Commissioner Volpe concurred with the suggestions to proceed slowly but indicated he Is not in favor of putting a hold on the program at this point. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Lorenz stated if the program is halted, Staff will not be able to determine what the cost will be to individual property owners, and the Board will have no further Information to assess. Commissioner Goodnight indicated her desire to know the cost of the program. She said a survey cannot be sent to property owners asking for their support, if the Board cannot tell them how much it will cost. Page 17 October 29, 1991 ~tsmion~r R~sse ~ed, seconded by Co-~tsstoner to r~fi~ conc~p~l mppr~l of the cost allocation methodolo~ for ~tntmtratton, o~ratton, ~tnte~ce ~d capital t~rove~nt pr~ c~t of the Collier CuW Stormter Utility Progru ~d the Stouter Ottll~ Rate Stu~ to proceed. Redmond Jones, past President of the Naples Park Area Association, stated Naples Park has spent $75,000 for an engineering survey, through a special t~tng district, to find a solution to the problems In their area. He asked how their engineering program will fit into the five year master plan for the Gounty? County Manager Dotrill Indicated the preliminary engineering that was done to determine what the actual cost would be to make the sub- division drainage improvements would eliminate any further preliminary engineering. He said the actual bid documents need to be completed and enviFonmental permitting must be obtained, however, the work that has been done will not have to be re-done as part of those specific subdivision drainage improvements. In response to Mr. Jones, County Manager Dorri]l advised those costs will not have to be paid again as they relate to the subdivision Improvements, however, the cost of improvements of a larger nature that Naples Park will benefit from living in North Naples and the Cocohatches Drainage Basin will be paid on a pro rata share. Go~lsstoner Volpe indicated he would be happy to explain the Issues to the residents of Naples Park. Co~tssioner Volpe questioned if the City of Naples and Everglades City should be excluded from the rate study? Mr. Comeau stated they should be excluded from the stormwate~ charge component because that is being looked at as an assessment type program. He said the ad valorem cost sharing component, however, will be addressed. In answer to Co~tsstoner Volpe, County Manager Dotrill stated approval of this item will allow the generation of approximately $13-mllllon over a period of five years for construction. He said / ooo . 27 Page 18 October 29, 1991 there are also maintenance and personnel costs. He said there will be a fixed rate for three years followed by a re-analysis of the rate for the balance of the five year plan. Upon ¢a~1 for the question, the motion carried 4/1 (Couleeloner Ite~ ~C1 A~RE~NT FOR TH~ 1991-92 FUNDING CONTRIBUTION TO ST. MATTHEW'S HOUSE - ~ Gil Erlichman, representing the Taxpayer Action Group (TAG), asked why St. Matthew's House has been singled out to be supported by Collier County? Commissioner Goodnight explained that during the budget process, a certain amount of money was allocated to help fund some of the agen- cies in the County who applied for assistance. She listed other orga- nizations that received funding from the County. Reverend John Lindel/ advised that along with providing food and lodging for single homeless men, St. Matthew's House provides meals to those in need. He said St. Matthew's House is a non-profit charitable trust and is not controlled by any religious denomination. Frances Barsh with TAG, asked if there is a compendium of all pri- vate organizations that deal with feeding and sheltering the needy7 Reverend Lindell reported an interagency manual and a coalition to feed the hungry manual is available, adding that information has been provided to the President of TAG. Martha Skinner, Acting Public Services Administrator, remarked there is a very supportive group of interagency members whose criteria and missions are listed in the interagency service manual. Co~ieeioner Saunders ~ved, seconded by Commissioner Hesse and carried unanimously, to approve the Agreement for the 1991-92 funding contribution to St. Matthew's House. Page 19 October 29, 1991 ANN~AL BLUEPRINT SUPPLY AND BLUEPRINT MACKINK MAINTENANCE CONTRACT AWARDED TO MR. BLUEPRINT, TRI COUNTY BLUEPRINT & SUPPLY AND KELLY BLUEPRINT - IN TH~ TOTAL AMOUNT OF $8~?76.82 ..... Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained Bid No. 91-1752 received lump sum proposals from four vendors for this annual bid. As an alternative to the lump sum bids received, he said, Staff has calculated splitting the supplies between the three lowest bidders who have all indicated acceptance of that proposal. He concluded Staff recommends awarding Bid No. 91-1754 to the three lowest bidders in the total amount of $8,776.82. C,~tsst~ner Shanahah m~vsd, seconded by Centseisner Hasse and ¢mrrt~ ~x~u~t~u~l¥, to award Bid No. 91-1754 to the three lowest bid- ~ers, Mr. Binsprint, Trl County Blueprint & Supply and Kelly Blueprint in t~ total ~t of 08,776.82. AMARD OF BID NO. 91-1730 TO BRO~ARD TKSTING LABORATORY RESCINDED AND ~ TO ~OS~ INC. Steve Camell, Purchasing Director, asked the Board to rescind the award to Broward Testing Laboratory of Bid No. 91-1730, because of an inability or unwillingness to meet the requirements regarding pro- fessional liability insurance. He explained the bid Involves the testing of drinking water for the Water Department to assure compliance with the required drinking standards of the State of Florida. He recommended the Board award the bid to the next lowest bidder, Gees, Inc., who is able to provide the necessary Insurance. He noted analysis by Staff has determined the difference between the lowest and second lowest bidder is $261. Commissioner Shanahan asked why the $2-mtllton general liability Insurance of Broward Testing Laboratory is not sufficient? Mr. Camell advised the types of claims Collier County is attempting to get protection from are not addressed under general liability coverages. Frances Barsh, with TAG, questioned the difference between the two 33 Page 20 October 29, 1991 types of insurance7 Mr. Camell reported the difference pertains to expertise and knowledge. He said professional liability involves protecting the Judgments, errors or omissions that a professional contractor might provide the County in delivering the services. He noted a certain degree of certification As required by the State of Florida to provide these highly technical services. In answer to Ms. Barsh, Mr. Camell stated that not all contracts require professional liability insurance. Cmisstoner Shanahah moved, seconded by Com~tssioner Hasse and cartie4 ~nantmou~ly, to rescind the award of Bid No. 91-1730 to Bro~ard Testing Laboratory and that it be awarded to Geos, Inc. s$~ Deputy Clerk Farris replaced Deputy Clerk Guevln at this time ''' DISTriCT 8 HP~kLTH COUNCIL~$ REQUEST FOR COLLIER COUNTY'$ FINANCIAL PAI~TIOIP&TIO~ IN & REQIONALIZATION STUDY - APPROVED Emergency Services Administrator Reardon reminded the Board of County Commissioners of the District 8 Health Council's request for the County to participate in a study aimed at dealing with two issues, that being helicopter regtonalizatlon and unfunded trauma care costs. He presented an affirmative recommendation that Collier County par- ticipate in the study for a total cost not to exceed $2,000 as their pro rata share in the regional study. He explained that in the event the Board of Gounty Commissioners gives approval today for the expen- diture of the $2,000, Naples Community Hospital has offered to pay one-half of that amount, i.e. $1,000. He related that the second phase of the study will deal with organization, structure and abili- ties to locally fund and control the program and will, in fact, deal with issues of surcharge on items that cause traumatic injury versus an ad valorem tax increase. He confirmed that Naples Community Hospital has shown interest in becoming a recognized Level II Trauma Care Center, and supports the second phase of this study. He explained that, after having discussed the matter with his counterpart 00o 34 Page 21 October 29, 1991 in Lee County, he has been informed that they will not financially support the second phase of the study based on several factors, one being they do not feel the need due to their recent purchase of a helicopter. He reflected that staff feels the reglonalization will assist in maintaining a Level II Trauma Care Center at Naples Community Hospital as well as possibly financially recognizing Collier County for its assistance on a mutual aid basis to surrounding coun- ties that currently have a need but cannot afford the ccst of purchasing a helicopter and providing services. He reiterated that the ultimate goal is to serve the traumatized patient within the first hour and, hopefully, result in lifesaving activities while also assisting the hospitals in picking up part of the unfunded cost of trauma health care. In reply to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Reardon identified the Phase I portion of the study and the action plan for the Second Phase. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Reardon stated that potential benefits to Gollier County residents include a potential to pool funding and eliminate certain redundancies with helicopter air service care, a potential to share helicopter maintenance facilities with surrounding counties, and possibly enhancement in obtaining grants due to the cooperative initiative to become involved with regionalization toward replacing the helicopter. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Reardon explained that, in order for the Naples Community Hospital to go after a Level II Trauma Care Center level of service, it is necessary for them to encumber quite a bit of infrastructure cost to maintain that type of service capability. He added that the costs can be borne through surcharges versus ad valorem taxes. Co~/e,~oner Shanahah m~ved, seconded by Com~issionsr Hmsse and carrim4 4/1 (Commissioner Volpe opposed), to approve the $1,000 ~ for the regional ~0DIFI~.ATION AND EXTENSION OF CONTRACT 90-1599 FOR CONSTRUCTION/ DE~OLITION WASTES ~C~CLINQ WITH NAPLI$ R~CYCLINQ R~SOURCES FOR A PERIOD OF 9~ DA~"S - APPROVED 35 Page October 29, 1991 Solid Waste Management Director Fahey outlined staff's request for approval to extend a contract for recycling demolition debris. He confirmed that the representative of the contractor is present today. He reported that, although the firm of Naples Resources Recycling was the only bidder last year, at the prebid meeting held last week some seven potential vendors were in attendance. He concluded that exten- sion of the present contract by ninety (90) days will provide the necessary time to take these bids, evaluate the proposals, provide the recommendations, select a vendor, and award the contract early next year. He remarked that the present contractor has been very success- ful and is recycling approximately 60% of the Construction/Demolition materials received. In reply to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Fahey explained that the County charges at the gate by the ton for the material as it is received, and, at the time the contract was originally let, $22 per ton was being charged. He reported that the contractor was in turn paid $22 for every ton he recycled and left the premises with and, therefore, is essentially being paid the money which is given to the County for disposal for the refuse and recycling. He verified that the contractor will continue to be paid $22 per ton for every ton recycled as well as $4.00 per ton for the nonrecyclable materials requiring burial in the lined cell. He concluded this does not factor in the higher rate the County is now charging for that ninety (90) day extension but keeps the contract under its present conditions. Co~imstoner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner ~asee and cmr=ied unanimously, to approve the extension of Contract 90-1599. Page 23 October 29, 1991 Iq~.,~OLUT/ON 91-752 TO BE S~NT TO SECRETARY OF DER SUPPORTING REQUEST FOR ~!FTION OF CO~IPLI&NCZ M/TH F,S. 403.708 (15)C PROHIBITING DISPO~kL OF Y&RD TIU~H IN LIIT~D CELLS AFTER JARUARY 1, 1992 - ADOPTED. PItOPO~d~LS lt~CgIVHD FROM FRANCHISEES TO EFFECT COMMERCIAL AND )~ILTI-FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAM~ - TABLED PKNDING REPORT FROM POST, Solid Waste Management Director Fahey stated that to-date there has been no response from the State regarding the previously forwarded Petition requesting exemption from the requirement of compliance with the Statute which prohibits disposal of yard trash in lined cells as of January 1, 1992, He hypothesized that should there be no response to the Petition or possibly a negative response to same, staff has asked the two franchisees to provide proposals as to alternatives for meeting the requirements of the law. He reported that the contract with WMI (Waste Management, Inc.) contains an exclusive item providing that they be the only provider of this particular service. He explained that their proposal for yard waste collection is a program obliging voluntary participation as opposed to mandatory par- ticipation, with the commercial/multi-family units being provided a separate dumpster for the deposit of those materials at a rate approved for the forthcoming year under the Rate Resolution. He implied that the proposed program provides an opportunity for a generator of yard waste to reduce his overall disposal cost to $18 per ton instead of $25. Regarding residential units on the voluntary program, he stated the vendor proposes to provide a 95 gallon cart and provide separate collection of these materials at a cost of $11.65 per month, or $139.80 per year. He explained that the proposal from Immokalee Disposal Co. provides for separate collection limited to ten bundles, bags or cans, none of which can weigh more than 50 lbs. at an additional cost on a voluntary basis of $7.10 per month, or $85.25 per year. Mr. Fahey verified that those wishing not to participate in the collection program have the options of taking their yard waste to one of the transfer stations or mulching and composting it at home. Page 24 October 29, 1991 Commissioner Volpe expressed concern that a system based on volun- tary participation can present a potential for dumping by persons seeking an alternative to proper disposal. Mr. Fahey stated that, as part of the 1988 legislation, those found guilty of "dumping" trash can be subjected to confiscation of their vehicle as well as substantial fines. Mr. Fahey reflected that for a number of years the Solid Waste Department provided funds for a Shertff's Deputy, at a cost of approximately $30,000+ per year, to provide patrol for offenders Improperly disposing of their trash. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Fahey referred to the copy of a newspaper clipping included with the Executive Summary regarding one county which received an exemption predicated on their plan to build a waste reclamation facility, pointing out that is one alter- native which Collier County may wish to consider, i.e. to Petition the State in January for an exemption. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Fahey confirmed that Collier County's application for exemption is based upon financial factors and the fact that it is currently processing and keeping 90% of the waste out of the cells and has done so since January of 1990. Commissioner Volpe suggested that a county with a Solid Waste Department that is the recipient of $100,000 from the Ford Foundation and which is one of the best Solid Waste Departments in the State of Florida should also be able to obtain an exemption. Mr. Fahey volunteered that he can prepare a Petition based on the likelihood that Collier County will build a MRF (materials reclamation facility), should the Board of County Commissioners decide to act on same as a Resolution. C,~m/Ntoner Volpe moved to direct Solid Waste Director Fahey to film ~n ~licmtion with State Legislature, based upon an anticipation that Collier County is going to have m MRF (m~mteri&ls reclamation facility), for an exemption from the req~lramant regarding yard waste 40 Page 25 October 29, 1991 Commissioner Goodnight pointed out that, according to the law, Collier County must comply with the 30~ recycling requirement by Januar~ let and the Legislature will not begin meeting until the 8th or 9th of January. Mr. Fahey suggested that a Petition passed as a Resolution by the Board of County Commissioners and addressed to the Secretary of DER (Department of Environmental Regulation) will carry substantially more weight than the Petition previously submitted by him. Co~imsioner Saunders seconded Commissioner Volpe's ~otion. Assistant to the County Manager Olltff questioned what start up time will be required for the franchisees. Be expounded that a deci- sion on the extension is needed by a definite date in order to allow the franchisees enough time to do whatever it is they need to do. Ktm Egelseer, General Manager of Waste Management of Collier County, suggested that sixty (60) days Is not too much lead time to request. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Egelseer stated that many communities which have the resource recovery plants are exempt from the separation of yard waste. Discussion ensued regarding the manner in which various counties are addressing the waste collection Issue. Regarding the motion which he has seconded, Commissioner Saunders reflected that a clear message should be that Collier County is con- sidering building a materials reclamation facility (MRF) for the future but has not, at this point in time, committed to doing so and, therefore, the request for exemption is based on the possibility of building one. Oo~tssloner Volpe a~ended the ~otton, and Comtestoner Saunders ~ his second accordingly, to Include the economic hardship ~ri~ I~y this co~u,ntty as nil as plans to perhaps have s mmte~t&ls re=l~tton fmctltty (NI~F) it so~e point in the future. Commissioner Shanaban questioned whether the previously passed Page 2 6 October 29, 1991 Resolution regarding removal of 60~ of the construction and demolition material from the waste stream helps. Mr. Fahey replied he feels it is addressed in the Petition, adding that, If it is not, he will add it to the Petition. Upon c&11 for the question, the motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Volpe ~ovmd, seconded by Co~umtsetoner Saunders and carrim4 ~nantmously, to continue this item for a period of three Mr. Fahey addressed the second element of the item being con- sidered, i.e. the proposals received from the franchisees to provide for a commercial and multi-family recycling program. He proceeded to explain the proposed methods for handling the commercial service. Commissioner Volpe expressed a desire to see this service go to competitive bidding. In reply to Commissioner Hasse's question of whether the County is legally able to go to competitive bidding at this point in time, Assistant County Attorney Wetgel explained that both Ordinance 90-30 and subsecfuent contracts with the franchisees reference that commercial recycling will be looked into but in no way prescribes the ultimate plan or program which might be adopted. Commissioner Volpe moved to advertise competitively for the com- mrctal mzut multi-family recycling program within Collier County. Discussion ensued regarding the amount of time required to comply with competitive advertising, concJ. udtng that a substantial amount of time is required to do so. Assistant Gounty Attorney Weigel stated the legal issue he wants to look into is the fact that Inasmuch as the franchisees for the respective benefit areas do have the franchise for solid waste generally excepting out construction demolition and one other type debris and, therefore, it is necessary to ascertain with specificity if, in fact, the elements of solid waste that are recyclable may, in fact, be pulled outside that waste which they are otherwise exclusi- vely entitled to. He stated he will address this issue right away. Page 27 October 29, 1991 ~im died for lack of a ~cond. c~i~ ~i~ly, to table dts~ston relative to the nste ~ge- ~t t~ ~ttl receipt of the re~rt froa Post, ~ckl~, Sch~ & ~e~l~ ~tt~ the reclmtton pl~t. O~isr Slits left the mttn~ at this ti~. NOTE: There will not be a resolution document for this item per County Attorney and Solid Waste Department. t3 Page 28 October 29, 1991 ~I~C~r. 1~1 IrBAR-~IrD BOIXINT ~S - ~PPROV~D Budget Director McNees pointed out the necessity to correct two items contained in the Executive Summary, one being under Road and Bridge, Fund 101, where the cost center should be 163628, and the other under Pine Ridge Industrial Park, Fund 132, where no budget amendment is needed and same therefore will be deleted. He explained there are two items representing more than just "housekeeping items" and reflect funds that will, without these budget amendments, show cash deficits at the end of fiscal year 1991, and are identified as Fund 101, the Road and Bridge Fund, and the EMS Fund (Fund 490). He proposed that the cash deficit be eliminated with a transfer from the General Fund reserves. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Finance Director Yankssky reflected that the budget amendment in question merely provides for reco~nizing interest income and moving it over into the debt service fund. Mr. McNees reiterated that this item is purely housekeeping and does not involve any impact. ComLtsstoner Volpe moved, seconded by Canisstoner Hesse and carried 4/0, (Commissioner Saunders not present) to approve the Budget Amendments am detailed in the attachBent. COOJFTT ~ATB3t $KJ~VXCK TO PKLXCAN PLAY - EFFECTIVE 11/4/91 Utilities Administrator Arnold provided a brief background regarding the three agreements entered into in 1986 between the City of Naples, Collier County, and Pelican Bay addressing the matter of a long term water supplier for Pelican Bay. He explained that the heart of the agreements set forth that the City of Naples would be an interim bulk water service provider to the Pelican Bay Improvement District for a period of no more than five years, at which time Collier County would take over and become the permanent bulk water service provider. He acknowledged that formal notice has been sent to Page 29 October 29, 1991 the City of Naples regarding Collier Oounty's intent to assume the water service to Pelican Bay, per its contractual obligation, and a request has been received from the City of Naples that Collier County entertain a delay in implementing its water service at Pelican Bay based on the fact that the City of Naples has not budgeted entirely for the loss of revenue. He relayed staff's recommendations that any agreement at this point that should reflect the delay is solely at the request of the Gity of Naples and should in no way imply that Collier County is not ready to meet its contractual obligations. He reported that impact fees for water totaling approximately $800,000 have been banked in the Pelican Bay funds and, according to the agreement, are for use by the provider of water at the end of the five year term. He stated that by being prepared to meet its contractual obligation at the end of the aforementioned five year period, Collier County is entitled to the impact fees. He relayed staff's proposal that the City of Naples not increase the bulk rate price being charged to Pelican Bay during this interim period. Regarding the Gulf Gate Plaza Shopping Center, he stated staff wants to use this opportunity to commit to writing what has previously been agreed to in order to effectuate the transfer of service. He reported there is an oppor- tunity for the Pelican Bay residents to have some relief on their expenses to operate that district should the County choose not to entertain the City of Naples' request at this time. Co~aAili~n~r Saunders returned to the nesting at this tiaa. Discussion ensued regarding the issuance of renewal Beach Parking Permit Stickers by the City of Naples for County residents and the amount owed by the County for same. Commissioner Volpe stated that Collier County has an obligation to its ratepayers. Bernon Young expressed concern over the fact that it will cost the Pelican Bay residents $30,000 more to stay with the City of Naples for the 100 day extension period. ~ut~er $ann~era ~ to approve the a~ree~ent with the City Page 30 October 29, 1991 o! )~pl# to delay tapl~ntatton of the County ~ater service to P~1t~ ~y with th~ proviso that the rates affecting Pelican B~y will b~ ~J~t~ so that the Peltcm ~y residents will not e~rtence a $10,~ l~s ~r the next 90-100 ~ys as well as the proviso that my ~t ~~ Collier ~W mt the City of Naples wtll ~ exe- ~t~ ~ ~~ or a~tlable ~ the close of ~slness on ~urs~y. ~tl~ Jails for lack of a second. ~r. Yonkosky reported there is a typographical error in ~he memo he received as the rate should be 95.5C and is based on a rate of five years ago. He questioned whether using that rate will, in fact, do anything to the bond covenants. C~t~t~r Vol~ ~, ~econd~ ~ Co~1o~1oner Ha~e ~d c~t~ 4/1, (C~tsstoner Sa~ders optsad) that Collier Co~ty ~ter ~d ~r for the Pelic~ ~y t~rovemnt division as~e the provt- si~ of ~table ~ter to the restants of Peltc~ ~y effective N~r 4, 1991. Itn OF J~~ ~C~E ~DING S~ICE ~IL ~I~ OF BIDS James P. Ward, Administrator of Pelican Bay Services, explained that this item is a recommendation for the Board of County Commissioners to terminate the contract for right-of-way landscaping services with R B Lawn Services, Inc., waive the competitive bidding requirements, and provide authorization to enter into a month to month contract with Land Design Systems, Inc. to continue the right-of-way landscaping service for the Pelican Bay community for the period beginninG on November let and endinG on February 29, 1992. He pro- ceeded to explain some of the terms of the contract with R B Lawn Services, Inc., concludinG that in the recent months the division has lost approximately 71,000 sq. ft. of sod in the Pelican Bay community which they attributed to insect or pest control problems in the com- munity, and which was subsequently disputed by R B Lawn Services, Inc. He confirmed that a solution has been negotiated whereby R B Lawn Page 31 October 29, 1991 Services, Inc. will pay for approximately 50% of the sod with the division paying for the balance. He referred to the letter from R B Lawn Services, Inc. requesting that their contract be terminated. He verified receipt of two quotes, one from Land Design Systems, Inc. and one from Jacaranda Landscape. He relayed staff's recommendation to enter into a nonnegotiated contract with Land Design Systems, Inc. for the balance of the contract period. In reply to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Ward confirmed that Jacaranda Landscape has the contract for the other portion of work to be per- formed and is therefore on-site. Commissioner Volpe suggested negotiating with Jacaranda Landscape to reduce their rid. Mr. Ward expressed his opinion that he will be able to convince Jacaranda Landscape to reduce their bid for the work to be performed under the balance of the contract with R B Lawn Services, Inc. Alex Castro, Administrator of R B La~ Services, Inc., attributed problems with the irrigation system as being partly responsible for the sodding difficulties. He read a statement regarding the problems they had encountered and their request for a termination of their contract, copy not provided for the record. Commissioner Hasse complimented R B Lawn Services, Inc. on the fine Job they are doing on the Golden Gate area median. Commissioner Shanahan complimented R B Lawn Services, Inc. on the excellent job they perform in the Marco Island area. C~mimetoner Shanaban moved, seconded by Commissioner Vol~e and carrig ~u~nt~l¥, to retain&re the contract with R B Lawn Services, Inc. ~n~ di~t staff to negotiate with J&caranda L&nd~c&pe to provide rt~l~t-~£-~F l~n~cmptng service for the Pelican Bay con.unity until n~e bt~dt~ c~n be r~vt~d. · ~- ]~e~d: 3:00 P.N. - R~convsned: 3:1~ P.N. at ~htch Deputy Clerk &fright replaced D~lmty Clerk I~rrts Ite~ ~ ~%NTED TO GIE AND ~ON FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND INGINKERING ~~ P~ ADDITION~ TO TH~ OOLLIER NORTH (0II #502)° GOLDEN GAT~ Page 32 October 29, 199] Office of Capital Projects Management Director Conrecode stated that this ltem is to request approval of a contract with Gee and Jenson to provide architectural and engineering services in connection with the addition to the Collier North, Golden Gate and Immokalee branches of the Collier County Public Library. He noted that per- mission is requested for the Chairman to sign said contract. Gommissioner Hasse questioned if the subject request is completely budgeted? Mr. Conracode affirmed that except for the Immokalee Branch Library everything is budgeted. Ms. Frances C. Barsh, member of the Taxpayer Action Group, referred to a memo from Finance Director Yonkosky (not provided for the record) and pointed out that the July 30, 1991 Consent Agenda only discussed the Golden Gate Branch Library and mentioned one bid, where now there are three projects ~nvolved. She questioned if there had been a bid for all three projects could there have been a savings? Mr. Conracode confirmed that the Board did approve on July 30, 1991, the Golden Gate Library Branch RFP, and at this time a recommen- dation is being made that the same design be used, thereby saving approximately $40,000. He added that because this request is for pro- feesional services compliance must be met with the Consultant's Competitive Negotiation Act which is not put out to bid but rather put out for professional proposals which is evaluated for professional services for the subject project. He noted that the firms did submit proposals for all three projects. He pointed out that the proposed firm has remained within the $50,000 design cap requested by the County for the subject projects as well as the $500,000 state statute annual cap. He concluded that the proposed consultant has agreed to maintain the hourly rates consistent with the contract. Commissioner Saunders ~oved, seconded by Conissioner Haeae and carri~ =nanim~u~ly, that the contract for the design of the addition to the ~lden Gate, Collier North and lmmokalee branch libraries be ~T~t~ to ~ and Jenson and per~aleeton for the Chairman to sign said mm Page October 29, 1991 ~~ 91-753, ~RE~TIN~ S~RIVENER EKROR ON N~WLY ADOPTED ~~ION DISTRICT MAP - ADOPTED Assistant County Attorney Weigel explained that the error found is that the boundary between Districts 2 and 3 should be the Golden Gate Canal rather than the Golden Gate Parkway which was depicted. He stated that the proposed resolution with the attached drawing corrects this error. He noted that the NAACP, the Hispanic Advisory Committee, and the President of the East Naples Civic Association were contacted and advised of this correction, and they indicated no objection. ~i~ioner Sara ~ove~, seconded by Oow-tsetonar Hasse and ca~rte~ ~i~tou~l¥, t~t the correction to the scrivener error on the ~IF ~~ ~ieelon dietrict ~p ~ appr~, there~ adopting Page 34 October 29, 1991 RgIOI,UTI~11 91-754, ItgAI'POI!ITI~O eAR R. L~, JR. ~ AI'POIIrfIN~ JACI~ ¢. CR0~F~R T~ T~g l'l~o~ar. gg &XRPO~ ADVX80RY BOARD - ~LDOP'TgD Commissioner Goodnight recommended that Mr. Lee be reappointed to the Immokalee Airport Advisory Board and waive the terms of office requirement since he would be the only resident of Immokalee on the Board. Commissioner Saunders suggested staff's recommendation of Mr. Jack Crouse for the second position available on the Advisory Board. Co~teeton~r $&undere ~oved, eeconded by Commissioner ~asee and c~t~ ~tmly, t~t the tem of office for the I~kalee At~rt ~i~ ~d ~ ~tved for Mr. S~ R. Lee, Jr.; therefore, rea~inti~ ~. S~ R. Lee, Jr. ~d ap~lnttng Mr. Jack C. Crouse as ~~ to t~ X~lee Alert Advi~o~ ~ard; there~ adopting Page 35 October 29, 1991 Xtem ~10B PETITION 8~P-90-13 REGARDING SAM ~CO P~ TO BE ~~ DECKER 10, 1991 Commissioner Shanahah explained that this item is requested to be reheard at the desire of Mr. Basik. Mr. Larry Basik provided to the Commission and for the record a brochure regarding the San Marco project of which he is the owner. He commented that he was not notified that this project was going to be presented to the Commission two weeks ago. Project Review Services Manager Madajewski asserted that the County has been in constant contact with Mr. Basik's representative, Mr. Lockhart of Lockhart Engineering, Inc. Mr. Bob Lockhart of Lockhart Engineering, Inc. confirmed that Mr. Mada]ewski did write a letter dated September 19, 199! indicating that as a result of the lack of action to complete the construction and plat phase the petition would be requested to be eliminated, and the letter also stated that notification would be provided as to when this request to the Board would be made. He noted that this final notifi- cation ks what he did not receive. Mr. Lockhart explained that Mr. Basik is not financially able to provide the bonds necessary to plat the project at this time, however, he does not wish to loose his investment and requests an extension of t/me. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Basik acknowledged that attempts were continually being made to comply with the requirements of the County; however, the bond situation had to be solved and com- municat~on was being made with County Attorney Cuyler. He emphasized that he was not notified o~ the particular date requesting the Board to expire the subject petition. Mr. MadaJewski informed that on June 12, 1991, he indicated in a letter to Mr. Lockhart that if the construction documents and plats submitted do not receive approval in a timely manner submission will Page 36 October 29, 1991 be made to the Board as to the validity of this petition. He pointed out that after two months another letter, dated August 15, 1991, was sent to Mr. Lockhart allowing thirty days for the submission of plans and requested information In order to keep Petition SMP-90-13 active; and then on September 19, 1991, a letter was sent to Mr. Lockhart informing him of the planned request for expiration of subject petl- tion. Mr. MadaJewskt noted that there is a liability issue for the County at this time. He added that his office had not been Informed regarding the bonding situation. He concluded that he does not feel that there has been any attempt to follow through on the part of the petitioner, therefore, does not feel that a reconstderation of the petition should be granted. Commissioner Volpe asked how much time would the petitioner need to commence construction on the subject project. Mr. Baslk responded that one year from June, 1991, would be suf- ficient. Mr. MadaJewskt objected. Commissioner Shanahan pointed out that there was a lack of com- munication between the County Attorneyfs office and Mr. MadaJewski's office. Mr. Basic related that without recording the plat the corrections requested by the County staff could be submitted within 45 days. Further discussion followed regarding the project and the completed infrastructure of it, the bonding, and the lack of com- munication between County departments. C~issioner $har~han ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Hasme and carrt~t i/0 (Co~isstoner Saunders not present), that Petition SMP-90-13 be scheduled to be reheard on December 10, 1991. Itm el0~ NAIV~ Ol PE!~IT FOR PARADI$1 (1AM~S - DENIED Commissioner Goodnight explained that she received a letter, dated October 11, 1991, however, was not received in the Commlsstoner's office until October 24, 1991, requesting a waiver of permit for the Page 37 October 29, 1991 Paradise Games to be held on November 10, 1991. Commissioner Goodnight recommended that this permit be waived. Ms. Connie Kormanyos, Director of the Paradise Games, stated that there are actually two permits which are being requested for waiver. She informed that there will be race-walking and running events on November 9, 1991, at the Vineyards on Vineyards Boulevard and the cycling event will be on S.R. 858 in front of Orangetree development on November 10, 1991. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Kormanyos advised that the purpose of Paradise Games is to plan a recreational program of events during the week of November 1 - 10. She noted that this is a charter member of the United States National Senior Sports Organization, and they are attempting to initiate a senior sports program in Collier County. She affirmed that this year the Paradise Games will barely if at all be breaking even, therefore, no charity will be benefiting from the games. Ms. Kormanyos noted in answer to Commissioner Hasse that they are working with the Sheriff's Department regarding these events. ~issioner Ha~se ~oved, seconded by Co~miaaloner Goodnight that t~e ~atv~r of pemit fees be ~ranted for the Paradise Gabass. Commissioner Shanahah expressed concern regarding the private aspect of the program. Commissioner Volpe stated that he could not support the motion, however, he offered to underwrite personally some of the cost for the event. ~ =all for t~e quest/on, the ~otton failed 2/2, (0omtsstoners Volpe ~ ~ opposed, Comtsslonsr Saunders not present). I~4~,13T/ON 91-755, &FPROVING M&T~R, W&STEM&T~R A~D IRRIGATION WORTHLY I~AT~, ~ AND CHA~GES FOR T~ WATER, WASTEWATER AND IRRIGATION FACILXTI~ AND $~NVICES WITHIN TH~ PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION SENVXC~ A!~EA - ADOP~I~ED WITH CHANGE Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on October 13, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with 0 12! Page 38 October 29, 1991 the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider a resolution approving water, wastewater and Irrigation monthly rates, fees and charges for the water, wastewater and Irrigation facilities and ser- vices within the Pelican Bay Services Division Service Area. Pelican Bay Division Administrator Ward advised that the proposed resolution adopts the Pelican Bay utilities rates, fees, and charges for FY 92. He noted that the rates for the Pelican Bay residents will be reduced approximately 3.43~. Mr. Ward informed that the County Attorney's office has requested that one change be made to the proposed resolution which amends the fourth paragraph to read, "WHEREAS, Collier County is authorized under Section 153.03 and Chapter 125.01(1)(k), Florida Statutes, to operate wastewater ...", which will provide for the adoption of the rates. CO~Lieetoner Volpe ~oved, seconded by Co~tsstoner Hesse and carrl~ 4/0 (~iseloner S~amters not present), to close the public ~nioner Volpe ~ov~t, ee¢omted by Commissioner Sh~nahan ~nd =arrt~ 4/0 (Commissioner S~unders not present), to approv~ the water, w~t~ter ~ Irrigation rates, fees and charges for the Pelican B~¥ krvicee Oivision's utility eyetel, effective October 1, 1991, with the ~ l~n~, thereby adopting Resolution 91-755. Page 39 October 29, 199! I~OL~TX~I~ 91-756, FROVXDXNG TH~ PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL ~R ~ & ~I~ ~SES~ ~R DKBT S~IC~ ~ A SPKCI~ ASS~SS~NT ~ ~~ OF ~ WA~ ~G~ ~ST~ MI~ ~ PKLIC~ ~Y ~CIP~ ~~ T~ING ~ B~FIT ~IT - ~D Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on October 6, 1991, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider a resolution pro- riding the preliminary assessment roll for levying a special assessment for debt service and a special assessment for maintenance of the water management system within the Pelican Bay Municipal Services Taxing and Benefit Unit. Pelican Bay Division Administrator Ward informed that the proposed resolution is to provide a Special Assessment Roll for levying a spe- cial assessment against the benefited properties within the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit for the maintenance for the water management system and for the debt service on the outstanding bonds issued by the Pelican Bay Improvement District. He explained that the special assessment covers the operations of the division of water management system, the right-of-way maintenance program, and the debt service on the outstanding Pelican Bay Improvement Systems bond. He noted that the assessment rolls provides for moneys to be collected totalling $1,105,502.74 for Fund 109 and 650. He related that the proposed resolution is consistent with the budget presented to the Board for Pelican Bay. Commissioner Shanaban Boved, seconded by Centseisner Hasme and c~r~td 4/0 (C~tsstoner Saunders not present), to close the public C~mm~t~ner Shanahah moved, seconded by Centseisner Hume and carFled 4/0 (~tsstoner Saunders not present), to adopt Resolution 91-756. Page 40 BOARD OF ~ ~SSIOI~R~' CO~INIC&TIONS October 29, 1991 Commissioner Volpe commented that complaints are continuing to be received regarding the new utilities rate systems. Discussion ensued regarding some of the problems the residents of the County are encoun- tering. County Manager Dotrill stated for the benefit of the listeninG public that meters will be traded out at the cost of $30.00 and moneys overpaid will be reimbursed with the adoption of the amend- ment to the ordinance. Commissioner Goodnight pointed out that the City/County Workshop scheduled to October 30, 1991, has been cancelled. Ite~a ,15 S?A~T'$ ~IC&?IOM$ R~OLUT%(~ 91-757, ESTABLISHIN0 6:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. AS THE SET TIME FO~ ~ TRICE-OR-TRKATIN0 - ADOPTED County Manager Dorril! reported that the appointed time for trick- or-treating this Halloween will be 6:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. O~dssioner Bases ~oved, seconded by Commissioner $hanahan and carrim4 4/0 (C~t~stoner Sanders not present), to adopt the st~dard rmlutt~ ~tabllmhed for Hall~en setttn~ ~he ti~s for trick-or- trmmtt~ mt 6:~ P.M. to 9:00 P.M., thmrm~ adopting Rmmolutton *****NOTE: RESOLUTION 91-757 NOT RECEIVED AS OF JUNE 15, 1992'***** Page 41 October 29, 1991 Comm/mmton~r $h~han mgn~d, meconded t~/ Commteetoner Huee ~d c~-rtmdun~nlmouml¥, tht the reliving tteu under the cm~m~t ~G~nda ~ appr~d ~nd/or adopted: A~Z&T/O~I F~ ~CORDXNG T]~ FIM&L PT.&T OF 'BL~J~DA GR~S, TRACT 91-749, PROHIBITING TI~ OPERATION OF TRUCKS &]TD OTH~ ~ ~C ~ 0N ~ S~10R 0F C.R. 901 See PaGe 91-T50, ~LZSH/NG S~ LI~I~ OR CR-951B~ I-~5 ~ ~ AT 45 ~ ~ 55 ~ Item #16C1 SeePage FOR T]~ 1991-92 FUNDING CONTRIBUTION TO THE DAVID LA~RENCE ~JL~TI~ CENTERr INC. FOR I~ 1991-92 FUNDING CONTRIBUTION TO RAPLZS L~.ADERSHIP SeePages TI~ 1991-92 FUlqDING CONTRIBUTION TO PRO3ECT HELPm INC. See Pages ~ ~ to 8C1 T~E 1991-92 FUNDING CONTRIBUTION TO SHELTER FOR ABUSED Item #1~C6 ~ ~ ~ 1991-92 ~ZRG CO~IB~/OR T0 ~g COLLI~ SOIL ~ ~ c~T~x~r ov cABa FOE THE ls9x-s~ ~V~DIW~ co~raI~uTiow See Pages _Go 3 - Page 42 October 29, 199! ~ ~ ~ :xgg:x-g2 lq:31DXllG ¢OIlTRXBO~XO~ ~) ~ TIU~:[~ZI~C] AI~D m~C~XO~, ~ ~On ~ ~mXC~ (~.~.C.~.) Xt~ ~l~cg JM31~4~rT FOR T]~ 1991-92 !q3NDING CONTRIBUTION TO THE VOLU1TI~R CENTER OF COLLIER COUllTY Xtm &UTI~O~XZ&TXON TO ~ XNTO CO~fl~tCT MXTH N&PLZ$ $COP~EX~ZP~ ASSOCZATZON FOR FROVZDXIG $CORB3[~q~RS FOR COUNTY SPONSORED ACTXVXT~g$ Xte~J/~C11 See Pages COffTIL&CT ~ COLLIER COUNT~ Jk~D TR&XNING &lqD ~DUCATZON&L C~NT~R FOR T~ NJU~DXC&FI~gD, 1~0. (T.~.C.H.} TO P~RFO!~ LJLRD~CJLPING ~ FOR !fX~C&L ~ 1991-92 lte~#16D1Ccmttnued to 11/19/91 Xtmml~X~D~ IE~ to ~ O~D~R J~O. 2 TO Z!~OrdkLEg ROJtD MATER, SKIEKR AND KFFT, UKRT CO]I~XC~ FRO3~CT TO D. Jl. HZGGX~, XIC. XR TH~ J~OUNT OF ~210f 411.75 See Pages ...~~ lt~,16D& BUD~NT ~E~IE~ITS R~COGNXZZ~G ~Y 91-92 C~ ~~ ~ 412 CO~ ~ C~ ZI ~ ~ 0F ~34,249,700 C~ZT~ ~ ~ ~ 0F ~22~627~100 ItnJ1S~ ~ ~ ~~ZXIG ~ 91-92 C~ ~~ ~ 408 CO~ ~~ DX~X~ XN ~ ~ OF ~293~100 It. Jl~ ~tt~ to 11/12/91 lt--Jl~Fl ~~ ~ ~XON OF A ~~ CO~ BE~ ~S~ GA~AY ~~ ~ ~~ XNC. ~ COLLX~ CO~ Xtom ,16~1 ACCKPT~ OF 1989-90 LXTTKR PRKVI31TXON JLRJIUAL RKPORT October 29, 1991 ~ IR]~C ~]~V/C~ B~ZLDI~G PRO3~C~ - IN TH~ JOqO~NT OF ~30,000 See Pages Ztem ,16ff6 Moved to 8H4 ztom dr1631 EXTRA GAZ31 T/ME /~R ZJIMATE RO*S. 58622r 18832f 30981r AND 47883 Item d~.SJ2 8ATZSIFACTZOII O~ LIKJlS !~R $B:RVZCBS OF TH~ POBLTC DKFEXDKR M~&~O~ CO~lq]:~POIID~IqC~ - ~IT,~D AND/OR R~I~IR~D The following miscellaneous correspondence was flied and/or referred to the various departments as Indicated below: Letter dated 10/12/91 to Chairman Goodnight from Robert Pennock, Chief, Bureau of Local Planning, Department of Community Affairs, re review of the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Collier County. xc: Nell Derrill, Frank Brutt, BCC and filed. Letter dated 10/08/91 to Chairman Goodnight from William g. Sadowekl, Secretary, Department of Community Affairs, re April Circle. xc: BOO, Neil Derrill, Ken Cuyler, Stan Litsinger and filed. Notice of Committee Meeting, House of Representatives, November 4, 1991, at 1:30 P.M., Room 214, Capitol. xc: Derrill, Frank Brutt and filed. Nell Letter dated 10/16/91 to BCC Chairman, from Jon M. Iglehart, Knvtronmental Specialist, Department of Environmental Regulation, re Collier County - WRR File #112035695. xc: Nell Derrill, Harry Huber and filed. Memo dated 10/08/91 to "County Contracts" from Gloria Woods, Health Services and Facilities Consultant Emergency Medical Services, Department of Health and Rehabtlitattve Services, re EMS County Grant Expenditure Report Reminder. xc: Neil Derrill, Jay Reardon, BCC and filed. 000 ~'"! 4~ Page 44 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. October 29, 1991 District Court of Appeal of Florida - Second District, Case #90-02495 - Tourist Development Tax. xc: Nell Dotrill and filed. Letter dated 10/15/91 to Chairman Goodnight from Guy L. Carlton, Tax Collector, enclosing the Collier County Tax Roll Annual Report for FY 90-91 and Schedule of Revenue. xc: Netl Dotrill, John Yonkosky and filed. Letter dated 10/08/91 to County Manager Dotrill from Gary L. Moyer, Manager, Lely Community Development District, advising of schedule of re~lar meetings for FY 92. Filed. Little Hickory/Bonita Shores Fire Control District Annual Financial Report - FY 90, w/District Map and Public Facilities Report. Filed. Minutes Received and Flied: Black Affairs Advisory Board agendas for 9/18/91 and 10/16/91, and minutes of 8/14/91 and 8/28/91. Marco Island Beauttftcatton Advisory Committee minutes of 2/5/91. Ochopee Fire Control District Advisory Board minutes of 516191. Notice To Owner dated 10/02/91 to Collier County Government from Scott M. Kirkwood, advising that he has furnished ser- vices or materials to form, place and finish concrete for Water Facility Improvements from Goodlette Frank Road to Livingston on Pine Ridge Road, under an order given by Florida State Underground. xc: John Yonkosky, Steve Camell and filed. Notice To Owner dated 10/07/91 to Col/let County Government from Scott M. Kirkwood, advising that he has furnished ser- vices or materials to form, place and finish concrete for the Teddy Bear Museum, under an order given by Florida State Underground. xc: John Yonkosky, Steve Camel1 and filed. Notice To Owner dated 10/09/91 to Collier County from Florida Door Systems, Inc., advising that they have furnished material and installation of folding doors for the East Naples Fire & Rescue Facility, under an order given by D. L. Porter Construction, Inc. xc: John Yonkosky, Steve Camell and filed. Notice To Owner dated 10/10/91 to Board of County Commissioners from Waste Management of Collier County, advising that they have furnished solid waste hauling and/or portable sanitatlon, for the Carica Road Tank & Repump Facility, under an order given by Crom Corporation. xc: John Yonkosky, Steve Carne11 and filed. Notice To Owner dated 10/O9/91 to Board of County Commissioners from Gulfstream S.W. Florlda, advising that they have furnished mechanical equipment for the Immoka]ee Community Center, under an order given by Wades Heating & Cooling, Inc. xc: John Yonkosky, Steve Camell and filed. Notice To Owner dated 10/16/91 to Board of County Commissioners from DeCoil Tile Co., Inc., advising that they have furnished ceramic tile, labor and material for the North Naples Community Park, under an order given by Cornerstone General Contractors, Inc. xc: John Yonkosky, Steve Carne// and flied. 478 Page 4.5 October 29, 1991 17. Notice To Owner dated 10/16/91 to Board of County Commissioners from DeCoil Tile Co., Inc., advising that they have furnished ceramic tile, labor and material for the East Naples Community Park, under an order given by Cornerstone General Contractors, Inc. xc: John Yonkosky, Steve Camell and filed. 18. Notice to Owner dated 10/16/91 to Board of County Commissioners from DeCoil Tile Co., Inc., advising that they have furnished ceramic tile, labor and material for the Immokalee Community Park, under an order given by Cornerstone General Contractors, Inc. xc: John Yonkosky, Steve Camell and filed. 19. Letter dated 10/10/91 to Chairman Goodnight from Paul J. Whalen, Supervising Professional, Everglades SWIM Project Manager, South Florida Water Management District, enclosing draft plan of the Surface Water Improvement and Management Plan for the Everglades. xc: BCC, NeI1 Dotrill, Bill Lorenz and filed. 20. Notice of Ihlbltc Workshop to be held on 10/24/91 from the South Florida Water Management District. xc: BCC and filed. 21. Letter dated 10/10/91 to Chairman Goodnight from James D. Yager, Interim Deputy Executive Director, South Florida Water Management District, enclosing copy of Resolution 91-38, "Adoption of Budget for Fiscal Year 1991-92". xc: Neil Dotrill, John Yonkosk¥, BCC and filed. 22. Memo from Supervisor of Elections Morgan dated 5/6/91 to Board of County Commissioners requesting budget advance. Neil Dotrill, John Yonkosk¥ and filed. XC: 23. Undated Memo from Barbara Everitt Bryant, Director, Bureau of the Census, enclosing copy of the 1990 Census Summary of Population and Housing Characteristics report for Florida. xc: Nell Dotrill, Tom McDaniel and filed. 24. Undated Memo to Chairman Goodnight from Jim Chaplin, Manager, Department of Housing and Urban Development, re FY 91 Section 8 Existing Vouchers, Project No. FL29-V141-005. xc: Nell Dotrill, John Yonkosky, BCC, Russell Shreeve and filed. Item ~J. 6K1 · OD~HT~ TO THE CONFISCATED TRUST FUND (602) IN THE AMOUNT OF $T19.O0 PO~ THE P~NL~HASE OF A PORTABLE OVERHEAD PROJECTOR B~I~ET Jk~NI:IMEIIT TO THE CONFZSC&TgD TRUST FUND (602) IN TH~ AMOUNT OF $6,600 PO~THE P~RCHASE OF AN A~TO ROBOT Xtem C~I~;FXCAT~ OF AC~'EPTANC~ OF ENFORCEMENT AND APPREHER$ION SUBGRANT AMJk~D ~9~--~3-~S--Og-21-01-089/COLLX~:R COUNTY DRUG ENFORCEMENT AND Item ~1~E4 ~T~O~ ~ AND ACCEPTANCE OF BID FOR AUTOMATION UPGRADE OF ~EAF~E~~I ANNEX - BiD ANA~DKD TO DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP OF PT. ~ IN THH M~0~NT OF $17,217.12 Page 46 October 29, ~99! There being no further business flor the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chalr - Time: 4:25 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL .- as presented X or as corrected ATRICIA ANNE G"OODNIGHT, CHAIRMAN March 3, 1992 Page 47