BCC Minutes 02/15/1994 RNaples, Florida, February 15, 1994
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building
"F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the
. following ~embers present:
CHAIRMAN: Timothy J. Constantine
VICE-CHAIRMAN:
ALSO PRESENT:
Betrye J. Matthews
John C. }(orris
Michael J. Volpe
Burr L. Saunders
Marilyn Fernley, Charlene Metz and Sue Barblretti,
Recording Secretaries; Nell Dotrill, County Manager; Ken Cuyler,
County Attorney; Heidi Ashton, David Wetgel, Richard Yovanovtch and
Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorneys; Tom Olliff, Public
Services Adm~nistrator; Norris I~ams, Emergency Services
Administrator; Mike McNees, Office of Management and Budget Director;
Wayne Arnold, Planner; Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects
Management Director; Dick Clark, Acting Community Development Services
Administrator: Greg Mihalic, Affordable Housing Director; Sheriff Don
Hunter; Deputy Dennis Huff, Collier County Sheriff's Office; and Sue
Fllson, Administrative Assistant to the Board.
Page
February 15, 1994
Commissioner Volpa moved, macended by ComtleeAoner Saunders and
,c~r~ed unani~ouel¥, to approve the agenda with the changee as
detailed on the Agenda Change Shoot, and the following additional
items:
1. Item #4C2 - Proclamation designating February 17, 18 and 19,
1994 as "Forget Me Not" Days - Added
Item #gB - Discussion of the Snyder case and site specific
fezones; procedures and requArements- Moved to end of regular
meeting.
Item #1611 - Reappointment of member to the Collier County
Industrial Development Authority - Continued to February 22,
1994 meeting.
Page 2
~2&
&(IZ]~ - LFPROVZD ,~/D/OR ADOPTZD
Febru.ar¥ 15, 1994
The ~otion for approval of the consent agenda l~ noted under Itel
(~2~)
:';,'MINOTE8 OF THC IMMOEALEB T0~LL MNrflN~ OF JANUARY 13, 1994 AND
,I~(~I~LR M~NTI~Q OF FEBRUARY l, 1994 - APPROVED
Co~a~liloner Matthews norad, leconded by Connleelonar Xorrie and
c~rrled unan~e~usl¥, to approve the Hlnutel of the Izmokalee Townhall
Meet~n~ of ~an~ ~3. 1994 ~d Re.lit Heating of Fsb~ ~. ~994.
(238)
~' ~ S~C~ ~5 - NOT ~S~D
Commissioner Constantine congratulated the following employees for
service with Collier County Government:
Val Prince - 20 Years, Capital Projects Not Presented
Wanda S. Hall - § Years, Utilities Water Not Presented
:PI~OCLa~ATZON DESI~ATING FEBRUARY 20-26, 1994, AS
~ - ADOPTID
Upon reading the Proclamation, Conalaeloner Samaderm hayed,
II~C~ by Col~B21110~lr MattheN~ mzd carried unanl~11¥, t~t the
~roclmtlon dlaignatl~g Fabruary 20-26, 199(, as Engtneer'. Neek be
idolted.
Ms. Laurie Swanson accepted the Proclamation for the Florida
Engineering Society, Calusa Chapter.
Page 3
February 15, 1994
(a e)
:tel
'.]iF~OC~tMATIOlf D!ISX~ATINO F~B~UARY 17, 28 AND 29, 1~94, &~ "FOROET M~
Upon reading the Proclamation, Coutfeloner Constantine ~oved,
~.' . eeconded by Com~l~oner Volpe ~nd c~rl~ ~1~1~, t~ the
~l~ti~ ~lt~ttng F/B~ 17, 18 ~d 19, 1~94, II "Forget
Mr. Ruben Vogel accepted the Proclamation for the D~sabled
~eric~ Veter~s, Collier Count~ Chapter 117.
February 15, 1994
.~OD~ZT JMZNDI~XTB g4-371, g&-l?g, g4-190 LND g4-20~ -
Office of Management and Budget Director McNees requested adoption
of the four (4) routine Budget Amendments as shown in the Executive
S'ommary.
Co~mLiIL~ner Norris ~oved, seconded by Commissioner ~tth~ and
that Budget Mnd~ente 94-171, 94-179, 94-190 ~nd
94-205 b~ adopted.
(490)
~!~' CL~X~tB ~ - NO ACTION
Comatssioner Constantine stated that the Clerk'e Report is for
~lnformatlon purposes only.
!:(493)
N.~. T~O~ I~(LMtDINO THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOI~ CODE,
X~~TX~ - 5T~ TO ~X~ ON A CASE-BY-CASE ~XS ~ ~C~
~A~ ~SXO~S TO ~ ~ D~O~ CODE
Milton Thomas stated that Section 2.6.11.5.6 of the Land
Development Code requires that fences and walls shall be constructed
to present the finished side of the fence or w~ll to th(~ adjoining lot
or to any right-of-way. Mr. Thomas indicated that the intent ks good
but it presents problems occasionally when the actual construction
takes place. Mr. Thomas explained that prebuilt panels are installed
from the outside and existing fences on adjoining property can prohi-
bit maneuverability and/or the property owners prohibit trespassing
because installation requires two to three feet (2"-3').
Mr. Thomas requested that provisions to the Code address unusual
c~rcumstance~ or that the Building Permit have a place for requesting
a waiver to the finished side out requirement.
Wayne Arnold, Current Planning, stated that Staff feels there is
ability to r~medy this situation by amending the Code but that it
needs to be looked at on a case-by-case bas~s. Mr. Arnold explained
Page
February 15, 1994
!.'.that the re~ltrement of presenting the finished side ts the
appropriate community standard.
Mr. Arnold stated that the Land Development Code ie in an amend-
Lent cycle and proposed amendments could be presented to the Planning
Commission ne~xt month. He explained that the amendments will
:'!;i ,eventually b~ presented to the Board of County Commissioners for
approval.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Arnold explained that a
variance request would require an adjoining property owner to show
cause why a fence cannot be placed finished side in If they deny
i!',i":access to their property for Installation.
~' It ~ the consensus of the Board that Staff administratively
.~::i/ address the le~ua as long as provisions exist for notifying neighbors
: t~t I problems with fence installation exists ~d if ~n~ntm to the
M ~l~mnt O~t are niceesaU, the ~ard of Co~ Coolmmionerm
will addre,e the~ after approval of the Collier County Planning
Co~dulon.
John Enlow, representing the proposed purchasers of the
Texaco/Ryder Truck Rental site on U.S. 41 east, stated that the County
i,- acquired 22 feet from the front of the property for the widening of
U.S. 41 east. Mr. Enlow explained that in order to complete plans for
a legal building, additional land at the rear of the proposed building
needs to be acquired. Mr. Enlow stated that a parking problem exists
"which makes it economically difficult to continue unless a reduction
fin the square footage of the building is accomplished.
County Manager Derrill stated that the Florida Department of
Transportation acquired the 22 feet. Mr. Derrill explained that there
.are prov~sions within Florida Statutes that must be adhered to If the
Page 6
February 15, 1994
· Board of County Commissioners declare the adjacent property surplus
/'and that an off-site parking agreement between the Board of County
iii. i: Commissioners and Mr. Enlow's clients may be an alternative.
.' Mr. Dorrlll stated that a combined Utilities and Community
· Development building is planned for the vacant land adjacent to the
proposed legal building.
Mr. Derrill explained that the an off-site parking agreement is
favorable to declaring the property surplus because of the work and
cost Involved but that It can be accomplished.
It w~e thm con~en~us of the Board to have Staff prepare options
for · ~tble off-site parking a~ree~ent and report back to the Board
of County ~aissioners.
Dick Clark, Acting Community Development Services Administrator,
stated that an extension of Building Permit Numbers 92-¢666, 92-466?
and 92-4668 had been granted previously for six (6) months. Mr. Clark
explained that due to financial difficulties, an additional six (6)
month extension is being requested.
Mr. Clark stated that past actions on similar issues is to have
the developer pay additional impact fees plus the building plans be
required to moet current Codes.
Louie Moore explained that he purchased the property and plans for
the affordable housing project from Mr. Sherwood under the name of
' Sherwood Arms, Inc. He stated that he ia now the permit holder and
one of the co-developers along with Max Holcher and John Sosva.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Moore stated that no waiver
of impact fees has been requested but that additional f~es could kill
the project. Mr. Moore explained that the developers are working with
a close margin while waiting for approval on two pendtnil hank loans.
Page 7
February 15, 1994
Mr'. Moore stated that tax credits are being used to partially finance
the project and strict rules exist limiting rents and income so that
.. every dollar going into the project must be limited.
Greg Mihaltc, Affordable Housing Director, stated that the County
does not have an agreement with this affordable housing project but
the tax credits granted to the project require that At be complete
by the end of 1994. Mr. Mthalic explained that the project cannot
afford an additional $130,000 in impact fees and still be viable.
Co~iseloner Volpe ~oved, ~condad by CopiesLoner S~undere and
carrLed un~nl:~ously, that Building Permit Numbers 92-466(5, 92-466? and
92-4668 be granted a six (8) ~onth extension, no additional
fees be uee~eed, $500 per per~lt te to be paid and building plan~
~u~t ~eet current Codes.
L) XtmEI~IL3
!~ '~ COII1XK~T A CAi~IIVAL FROM FEBRUARY 25 THROUi]H FEBRUARY 27, 1004
::'. ' FI~O]ITI'~R D&T~] - APTROVeD
M~tthewe ~oved, seconded by Co~leeIone~ Norris and
that Carnival Permit 94-1 be approvod.
Page 8
February 15, 1994
~URCHASE OF AN ADDITIONAL SOFTMARl[ COMPONENT FOR Tire ElliSTINS LIBRARY
'"', AUTOI(ATION ~Y~TEM FROM THE SOLE SOURCE OF DATA RESlL~RCll ASSOCIATES FOR
i~ ' R~PORT NRI~IX - APPROVED
Tom Olltff, Public Services Administrator, stated that the Library
is requesting the purchase of an additional software component for the
existing Library automation system which was purchased from Data
.Research As~ociates in 1992. Mr. Olliff explained that funds were not
.. available at the time of the original purchase for the Report Writer
component.
Mr. 0111ff stated that Report Writer will allow the Library Staff
to develop collection-use statistics, analyze terminal use and produce
~. -user-friendly bibliographies and service enhancing public relations
i~::%'matertals. He explained that Staff could determine what materials the
public Is and is not using without time consuming research.
Mr. 011tff explained that the cost of the Report Writer Program is
$22,090 and Stats Aid funds can be utilized for the purchase.
Colliesloner Natthew~ ~oved, seconded by Co~lieeton. ir S~mderl end
carried uniniloully, that approval be given for the ~lle of Report
~riter loftwire for the Librl~ autoMtion syite~ fro~ the sole ~ce
~: : of ~ta ~le~ch
)~ .~. (3s~)
It~
, -~,( · ,
~/:~~ATION OF ~ ~LI~ OF N~IN~ P~S nC~ITY P~Su -
Tom Olltff, Public Services Administrator, stated that Staff is
recommending that Collier County continue the practice of naming
."parks "Community Parks."
Mr. Olltff explained that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
is concerned that the names of two (2) upcoming park projects, Pelican
~'Bay Park and the Park in the Vineyards, may be confu~In9 because they
""do not indicate they are public parks and are located within large
Planned Unit Developments (PUD). Mr. Olltff tndtcatE~d that the
Page 9
February 15, 1994
:i. Advts0rY Board felt the policy of utilizing "Community Park" will
!~!~clearly indicate the open and public nature of the parks.
?..~ In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Olltff stated that the
parks can be designated Community Park, A Public Park.
Commissioner Matthews ~oved, seconded by Cow-tseloner Iorrle ~nd
carriedu~t~ouslF, that the ~ard of C~ty Coat,slo~rs continue
t~ ~1t~ of mtn~ ~ 'Co~IW Park' with the ~rdt~ 'i ~bltc
~k' plac~ ~1~ ~ a st~d for all lucre ~rk sl~s ~ when
repl~c~aisttn~
~L: I~F~OLUTION gA-?9 ~ APPOXNTMENT OF MONTE LAZARUS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY
Donald Reid, applicant for appointment to the Collier County
Airport Authority, stated that he has been a Marco Island resident for
15 to 16 years and Is retired with over 43 years of aviation related
experience in diverse military and civilian organizations.
Monte Lazarus, applicant for appointment to the Collier County
Airport Authority, stated that he has 34 years of experience in
aviation divided evenly between the U.S. Civil Aeronautics Board and
'~::".Sentor Vice President of United Airlines. Mr. Lazarus explained that
he Is now retired and a full time resident of Marco Island.
In respom3e to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Lazarus explained that his
law practice is located on Marco Island and he does not have a law
office located up north.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Lazarus stated that he no
· longer has a relationship and does not do consulting work with United
Airlines or the U.S. Civil Aeronautics Board that would Influence his
work on the Airport Authority.
.~:' Administrative Assistant to the Board Ftlson stated that this
J~/appotntment will fulfill the term expiring on August 10, 1997, vacated
by Anthony Carro and both applicants meet the requirement of residency
i..- on Marco Island.
Page 10
February XS, 1994
Coa~leeloner ~aundere ~oved, aeconded by Co---ieeloner Natthews and
carrleduna~imousl¥, to appoint Nonto Laz&~us to the Collier County
&lrport luthertry, thereby &doptlng l~eolutlon 94-?9.
Page
February 15, 1994
NVALU&T~ON OF TH~ 800 M~Z CO*~UNZCATIONS 5YST~ FOR COLLZ~ CO~
~ CZ~ C~C~TZ0~ ~0~, INC. - 8T~, C~ZCATZON
~ ~~S O~I~ TO D~OP ~IT~IA, ~CEI~ ~O~S~S,
ST~ ~ ~ ~aE ~S~ ~ ~UA~ ~O~S~S
TO ~ ~ AT ~CH ~, ~994 ~TIN~
Norris IJams, Emergency Services Administrator, stated that on
January 4, 1994 River City Communications Group, Inc. was selected to
evaluate the Collier County 800 MHZ communications system. Mr. IJams
explained that Chris Ntnd, Director of Communications for the Collier
County Shertff's Office, Steve Camell, Purchasing Director, and him-
self reviewed the draft report.
Mr. I Jams explained that Sheriff Hunter requested that the review
committee be expanded to include the communications group that has
· been working on this project for three (3) years. He Indicated that
/the group was expanded to Include Capt. Wayne Graham, Chairman of the
Communications Committee, and David Craig of the Productivity
Committee.
Earl Hoffay, President of River City Communications Group, Inc.,
stated that three (3) main questions were posed and are addressed in
his one (1) page communication dated February 14, 1994 to the Board of
County Commissioners (i.e. yes, the existing system has the capability
to meet APCO 16 standards for public safety; no, the existing system
does not have the capability to meet APCO 25 Public Safety Standards
?/.[as presently proposed; and no, the existing system does not have the
capability to meet the recommended system design codified with the
DivCom Engineering Report).
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Hoffay explained that
;~i ~ths completion of the APCO 25 is uncertain at this point.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Hoffay stated that the
main advantage of simulcastIns is frequency conservation, tt covers a
wide area, all sites have all frequencies in the system and every fre-
quency is broadcast at each site. Mr. Hoffay explained that with
' multicasting, sites transmit only as a requirement exists for
Page 12
February 15, 1994
ranemission and the density of the repeaters are placed where the
~'.density of coverage is required by population.
Mr. Hoffay stated that Exhibit "A" in his report depicts the 22
channels reserved for Collier County in the Florida Region Plan and
each channel has a 12 mile protected service area contour. Mr. Hoffa¥
explained that the 22 channels are not currently licensed but are in
reserve if needed.
Mr Hoffa¥ etated that Exhibit "B" is a typical simulcast site
with ten (10) transmitters coupled into two (2) five (§) channel com-
binere, 290 feet of hard line going to a DB560 transmit antenna and on
the other eide is another DB560 receiving antenna with a tower top
free amplifier (DB8980P). Mr. Hoffay explained that the receiving
line proceeds down to a 24 channel receiver multicoupler which equates
to ten (10} repeaters, ten (X0) transmitters and ten (lO) receivers at
~:... each site (eight). Mr. Hoffay indicated that it can be microwave,
./'~ fiberoptic or phone line supported.
Mr. Hoffay etated that Exhibit "C" displays Table B-! the
Communications System Budgetary Cost Estimate and Item 1 list a quan-
tity of three (3) Tx/Rx Antenna Multi-Coupling Systems at a cost of
$49,9?8 each. Mr. Hoffay stated that Exhibit "D" displays Table B-2
and breaks down the unit price and expands by three (3) Item ! of
Table B-X. Mr. Hoffa¥ explained that shortages exist in each item
listed (i.e., quantities are not sufficient on Item 1 to support the
environment of a ten (10} channel, eight (8) site simulcast system).
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Hoffay explained that a
a~mulcast system is more expensive than a multicast system.
Mr. Hoffay stated that Item 2 of Table B-1 shows 80 800 MHZ
trunked repeaters and ~s adequate and that Items 4, 5 and 6 are
required equipment for the total system. Mr. Hoffa¥ explained that
~:' Items ?, 8, 9 and 10 are required if utilizing Collier Count¥'e own
self supporting towers.
Mr. Hoffay stated that Items 12, 13 and ~4 of Table B-! list a
.quantity of 20 when only ten (10) are required and there are 1,236
Page 13
February 15, 1994
mobile/portable units in the public safety environment and that is
. sufficient loading for 16 channels. Mr. Hoffay pointed out that
!~.'
Item 36 indicates that the second year contract maintenance is
~:~ , $888,939.
Mr. Hoffay stated that Exhibit "E" depicts the 22 channels
~'.[] reserved for Collier County and 27 transmit and receive frequencies in
800 MHZ which are currently licensed so the total population could
reach 49 channels should the need arise which is based on the number
'of units required to utilize the system.
Mr Hoffay quoted from Exhibit "G" "if an agency is licensed for
trunked frequencies, and does not meet the loading requirement of 70~
loading at the end of the fifth year a "packing" of units on the basis
of 100 units per channel will be enforced by the FCC..." Mr. ltoffay
explained tha~ Exhibit "H" reads that the grand total projected radio
population in 1995 for public safety is 2,036 units as of the DtvCom
report dated September 28, 1990; thus, Collier County has already
exceeded th~ 70~ requirement.
Mr. Hoffay stated that Exhibit "I" describes Public Safety Radio
'Services and Exhibit "J" lists the eligible services that can license
in the radio services (local government, police, fire, highway main-
tenance and forestry conservation).
Mr. Hoffa¥ stated that Exhibit "K" reads, in part, "Paragraph (7},
Governmental entities and governmental agencies for their own medical
activities."
Mr. Hoffay stated that Exhibit "M" relates to slmulcastlng and
and points out that all frequencies transmit to all sites. He
'~ explained that to expand the system beyond the original allocation of
' ". ten (10) channels, eight (8) repeaters are required for one (1)
frequency. Mr. Hoffay Indicated that power levels vary with
/! atmospheric and climatic conditions and Interference zones exist where
ii:, signal paths reach and overlap the others. He pointed out that
· ' : sisrulcasting is unable to provide redundant coverage and that repeater
population varies by the number of sites; the more sites, the more
Page 14
:[ . February 15, 1994
!'~!/repeatera per frequency. Mr. Hoffay etated that continuous main-
tanance As required to keep the interference zones to a minimum.
Mr. Hoffay stated that Exhibit "N" represents the recommended
locations in the Division of Communications report ~,ith a 12 mile
radius. He explained that non-capture areas repres,~nt potential
problem areass if failures occur in phasing, power levels and frequen-
cies, the non-capture areas become non-usable.
Mr. Hoffay read the following excerpt from Mobile Radio
Technolo~, June 1988, "Simulcast and Digital Technolo~" by
Dr. Gregory H. Stone, Philip W. Raymond and Fred A. Schmitt.
"Areas between transmitters where signals have roughly
equal az~plitude are called overlap areas. The reason for
tightly controlling the transmitted signals amplitudes,
phases and frequencies As to reduce distortion in signals
received in overlap areas.
In other areas where one transmitter's signal is much
stronger than all the rest, the designer relies upon FM's
capture effect to control in overlap areas and the capture
effect in others fail to take full advantage of the propaga-
tion of all the signals, thereby limiting the usefulness
of eimulcaeting. More overlap from more sites should always
give better results, but current detection methods prevent
simulcauting from delivering its full potential."
Mr. Hoffsy read the following excerpt from Radiq Resource,
March/April 199~, "Wide-Area Trunkin~ Technologies" by Kim Putdis.
~Al~ repeater sites must have identical freqvencies.
Adjacent sites transmitting on the same frequency can cause
mutual interference. If a radio is closer to one s~te, that
site will "capture" the radio. But in the area where
coverage from more than one site over/ape, there is a noncap-
ture area. Within this area, the signals can complement one
another to produce an unintelligible beat frequency. To
minimiz~ the change of an audible beat, the frequency, audio
Page
February 15, 1994
amplitude and audio phase of each RF signal must be carefully
controlled to arrive in the noncapture zone within a very
strict tolerance of one another.
For a mile in the overlap area of an 800MHz system, this
means that the RF signals it receives from each of the
overlapping sites must be within 5 Hz of one another, the
amplitudes must be within +-.5 dB and the maximum allowed
phase difference is +-30. Any trunking system using a
control channel and transmitting low-speed subaudible dotting
with the voice must also assure that the data signals for
overlapping sites arrive within 1/2 bit of one another."
Mr. Hoffay explained that Exhibit "P" is an overlay of the DivCom
report and is a summation of all Collier County sites showing wide
area coverage.
Mr~ Hoffay stated that Exhibit "Q" represents the possibility of
failure due to overlapping and he pointed out that near the intersec-
tion of Everglades Boulevard and S.R. 84, an area is located that has
lost its coverage.
Mr. Hoffay stated that a typical simulcast site to depicted in
Exhibit "R" and is a ten (10) channel transmit and receiver site.
,see Recoo8~ 10:36 A.M. - Rsconvsnod: 10~50 A.M. at ~hich tim
· Recording Secretary Metz replaced Recording Secretary rernle~. f'"-
Explaining Exhibit "S", Mr. Hoffay stated that Multicasting, also
called auto tracking, Is a form of transmitting whereby multiple sites
,. are selected. He described the basic elements addressed in the
'exhibit.
Mr. Hoffay clarified Item three of Exhibit "S", noting that the
overlapping areas enhance coverage and utilization with Multicasting
'.Configuration, which precludes total site failure. He pointed out
that Multicasting replicates cellular technology by registering on a
remote site, so the unit then will receive all transmissions directed
to his group.
Page ! 6
February 15, 1994
':' Mr. Hoffay explained the 25 mile projections shown in Exhibit "T".
Responding to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Hoffay replied that the
reason the radius of coverage is twice as great with the Multicast
Project, as opposed to Simulcast Project, is because 900 foot towers
are used with 27 frequencies and a 75 mile protected service area for
the Multicast, versus the 300 foot towers with 22 f~equencies and a 12
mile protected service area used for Simulcast.
Exhibit "U", Mr. Halfay related, is a Typical Multicast Site,
showing that the hardware required to couple a Simulcast Site tn the
antenna confi~uratton is the same as it is in a Multicast Format.
Addressing the five channels of Mutual Aid, Mr. Halfay called
attention to a paragraph in Section Three of his report recommending
that construction of the § Mutual Aid channels be in conjunction with
any pursuits In the 800 MHz band. He revealed that the 27 frequencies
the County is currently licensed for are not frequencies In the
Florida Region Plan, therefore, to construct a Public Safety System
and insure compatibility with adjacent Counties or Federal Officials
who may come in with other vendors equipment, the County would be
required to construct the 5 Mutual Aid channels to overcome any Incom-
patibility between manufactures.
He reported that since 1986, equipment from all manufacturers
must be able to play on conventional repeaters (Mutual Aid channels),
because Trunking Systems Inherently do not talk to each other.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Halfay disclosed that the
State*a system is a combination of the Multicast and Simulcast
systems.
Commissioner Constantine Inquired if one 800 MHz system could com-
municate with another 800 MHz system, regardless of the system used or
:.:.iJ which manufacturer was used, by utilizing the 5 Mutual Aid channels,
to which Mr. Halfay responded in the affirmative, stating that that is
the function of the 5 repeaters nationwide.
M=. Halfay explained the Auto-Track Networking Mode as set forth
in Exhibit "V". He stated that when a Swat Group of Units are
Page 17
February 15, :1994
'!i assigned a cods on Site One, and one of the units are dispatched to
another area, leaving the coverage area of Site One, the mobile radio
then goes Into a scan mode, looks for the next site, logs and
registers on the next site, so that when a dispatcher at Site One
makes a trans, mission, the transmission :1s re-broadcant and re-routed
to Site Two and to the wandering vehicle that has longed on at Site
Two.
In response to Commissioner Volpe's Inquiry regarding the dtf-
ference between Simulcast and Multicast, Mr. Herfay explained that
there are no site registrations for Simulcast, since all sites
transmit on Channel One.
It was lit. Herlay's understanding that General Electric, through
their Single Channel Autonomous Trunktng [SCAT) mode, also has this
methodolog~ that allows the units to register from site to alta,
moving the transmission with them. He noted Motorola has a SMART
zone, which is part of the State plan, which also employs this t~pe of
registration technolog%,, alerting the main computer of where you are
and routing the transmission to your unit.
Mr. Herfay advised that Exhibit "X" states that the Protected
Service Area for the 27 frequencies that are currently licensed to
Collier Countu, is a 75 mils site to base range.
Exhibit "Y", Mr. Herfay explained is a Coverage Projection on a
Ttrem Model that was made by Everglades Communication in 1988 with one
tower site, showing that 25 miles of mobile coverage could be provided
i~..i and 25 miles of portable coverage could be achieved 80 percent of the
time. He disclosed this system does not provide portable coverage
?... inside buildings.
Responding to Coutastoner Matthews, Mr. Hoffay clarified that the
Everglades Con~untcatton projection listed an average of 80 percent of
the coverage area would be portable and mobile covera{ts, however, the
.system performed very poorly inside buildings, therefore, an expansion
".of additional tower sites would be needed in the Multicast scenario.
Commissioner Volpe stated he is under the Impression that Collier
Page :18
February I5, 1994
.County currently has four tower sites, to which Mr. Hoffay remarked
that currently the County has 800 MHz on only one of its tower sites.
In response to Commissioner Matthews regarding the poor reception
inside buildings, Mr. Hoffay communicated that the problem is RF
penetration through the concrete and steel structures, however, he
suggested penetration could be achieved by placing a tower site In a
more centrally located area and supplementing the site with two
satellite receivers.
Commissioner Constantine asked Mr. Hoffay if four tower sites
:%.. would fulfill the need in Collier County, to which Mr. Hoffay
suggested that it is a plan that could be taken to the three vendors
for them to determine the coverage.
Commissioner Matthews inquired if the Florida Highway Patrol,
patrolling through Collier County, using Motorola equipment could
receive and transmit with the Mutual Aid Repeaters on the Collier
County ~yetem regardless of the vendor?
affirmative.
Mr. Hoffa¥ replied An the
Commissioner Volpe cited a memo circulated by the County
Attorneys Office regarding the 27 channels that are currently allo-
cared to Collier County as part of the license the County holds at the
present time.
Assistant County Attorney Wetgel announced that he was made aware
of the additional 22 channels reserved for Collier County during the
course of the meeting, however, it is his understanding that those 22
channels are a potential availability, if and when the County fully
utilizes the 27 channels that have been previously allocated for
County use.
Commissioner Volpe asked tf the School Board could use the new 800
MHz system. Mr. Hoffay replied that the School Board could use the
current 27 frequencies since they are not licensed as a Public Safety
Trunking Syst~m, but the 22 frequencies in reserve in the Florida
Region Plan would be licensed as a Public Safety Trunking System,
'therefore, th,~ FCC rules would exempt certain elements of the School
Page 19
February 15, 1994
~ Board from ~ublic Safety transmission. He noted that a true Public
~:~'Safety Trun]dng System lies between 820 and 825 ~lz.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Herfay indicated the
existing 27 channels assigned to the County are general government
frequencies, and not Public Service. He further Indicated that all
'~ Collier County Governmental Agencies could utilize the 800 MHz system.
'!! Responding to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Herfay disclosed that
Jacksonvilleis system is not Multicast or Simulcast, rather there are
multiple systems that are not linked together with their only link
being the ability of the mobile radios to switch from system to
~( system.
Mr. Herfay projected the system, with current conditions, would be
at maximum utilization serving up to 3000 users on a 2? channel
. system. He noted that Naples projected population appears to double
every five yea~s and according to First Union, Naples is the second
!':fastest growin~ city in the country. Mr. Herfay stated that if Naples
~::' continues to grow at the rate it has in the past, the system demand
will increase. He noted that the system is expandable to accommodate
the growing need.
Commissioner Norris asked Mr. Herfay if the 2? channels the County
i~!i'~ has licensed have a 75 mile protection range, and if the County could
i~uee those channels under the Simulcast System with four(4) 900 foot
towers and have an operable system, to which Mr. Herfay replied In the
~J /. affirmative.
~'~i Commissioner Norris inquired tf all the equipment, or a portion of
?.~ the equipment would be lost if the County originally installed a
Multicast System and wanted to change to a Stmulcas~ System at a later
date. Mr. Herfay declared that most of the equipment would remain the
. same, such as the Towers, Antennas, Transmitter Combiners, Receiver
~i~!~ M~lti-Couplers, Power Support Group and Multi-Coupling Devices. He
~11 explained that due to a change in frequency standards, and additional
devices necessary for the Simulcast System, the devices would not
remain the same.
Page 20
February 15, 1994
In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Xoffay stated that the
:'!'~! portable/mobile units should be unaffected by a change In systems.
' - Commissioner Norris Inquired if the County could increase func-
tional ability once the Multicast System was saturated, by switching
to the Simulcast System, and would the Simulcast System support more
users than the Multicast System?
Mr. Hoffay doubted more users could be supported with the
Simulcast System. He explained that the Issue is that a 27 channel
system will support approximate 3000 users.
Commissioner Saunders contended that with the Simulcast System, a
wider area and more simultaneous conversations are Hosstble than with
the Multicast System. He Inquired how many simultaneous conversations
were needed in Collier County to meet the needs of Public Safety? He
stated it is his understanding that with the Multicast System the
Count-F would have enough simultaneous conversations to meet the
'i: Count~s needs.
;".:'- - Mr. Hoffa¥ suggested that a Load Analysis should be done to pro-
perly assess the needs of Collier County and to build the system.
Cogmtesloner Constantine inquired regarding the cost and the
annual ~taintenance costs on the Simulcast versus the Multicast System?
Mr. Hoffay cited a Division of Communications Report stating that the
· annual maintenance cost of a ten (10) channel, eight (8) site
· Simulcast System was $880,000.00 in the second year. He noted that if
the number of channels increase, the cost will increase.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Hoffay confirmed that
if expanded to do so, the County~s existing system would be capable of
serving the needs of Public Safety in Collier County and that
':.'expanding the current system would be considerably less costly than
'- purchasing a new system, and at a lower annual maintenance cost.
Responding to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Hoffay referred to a Cost Pro-
i' ~ectton for expanding the existing 800 MHz Multicast System that was
submitted to Collier County by E. F. Johnson, stating expansion cost
would be approximately $6,000,000.00. Mr. Hoffay pointed out that the
.. Page 21
February 15, I994
i,rsport specified only three (3) tower sites and a single channel to
support encl~fI~tion, which would not be adequate to meet Collier
Count¥'s needs.
Sheriff Don Hunter disclosed he believed the Board of County
Commissioners should adopt the report and to immediately retain an
'electrical engineer to begin the process of acquiring a system.
Sheriff Hunter paraphrased from a letter from the Division of
Communications, clarifying Mr. Hoffay's Draft Report. He commented
that the Simulcast System could be a valuable asset, especially in the
-, Public Safety arena, whereas the Multicast System may well be an
appropriate application for commercial grade systemo. Paraphrasing
from page two (2}, Sheriff Hunter quoted, "the overview given to
Simulcast Technolog~ in the consultants report can be more straight
forward. In our follow up report to you, the advantages and dtsadvan-
!~:"f?.tages of Simulcast versus Multicast were discussed. There are many
"Simulcast Systems operating today. It Is far from the impossible
system the report is making it out to be". Sheriff Hunter further
[~ quoted, "The finding portion of the report is more like an endorse-
ment of one manufacturer over others, rather than an objective
~:-conclusion to an objective analysis. Furthermore, to model a Public
Safety Model after the cellular technology is out of order. The
cellular community doss not have Public Safety requirements. Public
Safety does not have the large blocks of frequenctef~ that the cellular
industry has. Disregard towards adherence to the concepts and goal
spectrum management is at odds with foundations on which the Public
/ ; Safet~ systems are designed (referring to Multicast versus Simulcast}.
The report does not afford spectrum management the significance it
deserves. As engineers, public servants and taxpayers, we will not
advocate a deficient system that may cost less now in dollars, but may
cost later in lives and more money. Multicast is not spectrally
~( efficient for a county as large as Collier. Public Safety
Communications design is a function of the busiest hour of the busiest
· day. It is conceivable that all si~es will need to be operating at
50
Page 22
Fel~ruary 15, 1994
one tt~a during disasters (County-wide). It is then that the short-
comings of a Multicast System may cause irreparable compromise to the
safety and welfare of not only the citizens, but the officers and
fire-fighters utilizing the system".
Sheriff Hunter remarked for the record that Public Safety is his
only concern, both for the /ives of the officers who risk their lives
every day for public safety, and the citizens they serve. He asked
the Board to give great weight to that consideration when they deli-
berate pertaining to the system that is finally designed for Collier
County; and that they not be shortsighted, looking only to the cost of
the initial system; and finally he asked if the Public Safety Agencies
could be ~nvolved in the discussions with consultants, and in the
.deliberat~ons pertaining to specifications and the needs of Collier
.. County, as far ae they pertain to Public Safety.
Sheriff Hunter revealed that the Public Safety Division was not
contacted by Mr. Hoffay, therefore, Mr. Hoffay cannot be aware of
what the Public Safety needs are on a county-wide basis, and there-
fore, he would not be able to give a clear, concise report pertaining
to whether the Multicast System or the Simulcast System would work.
Randall Evans of Motorola Communications Electronics stated that
having so many choices can be confusing. He suggested the Board
assess exactly what the requirements are, then chose the technology to
meet those requirements.
Mr. Evans voiced his concern regarding the Board'e choice of con-
maltants, stating that the consultant selected is not a non-biased
source of information.
Mr. Evans pointed out section three (3) regarding the capability
of the existing systems ability to meet the recommended system design
codified within the DivCom Emergency Report, noting there is a lack of
understanding regarding what the requirements are for Collier County.
He declared tibet the technology used is not important, if the require-
mentie to meet in-building coverage and to make the most efficient
Page 23
February 15, 1994
'of the :frequency resource, further noting the State's report
recommends :31mulcast. If the requirement Is outside portable
coverage, i't is possible to use very few towers and building tops,
which would equal less money. He suggested it would be prudent for
any coverag,w prediction to be backed up with scientific evidence
regarding how much coverage would be accomplished.
Mr. Ev~s suggested that the Board state the requirements for a
Public Safet:y 800 MHz System in a Request for Proposal (RFP}, whlch
could also ~:equlre that the new system be capable of interfacing with
the existing system. He advised choosing the lowest complying bidder.
Mr. John DtSalvo, Division of Communications, stated he believes
that radio coverage is the single most critical performance factor in
comm4~nications. He declared that the lack of radio communications
causes delay, in response tlme and Jeopardizes safety in threatening
situations. He noted that hand held radios have become the standard
tool for public safety personnel. Communication delays, he satd, are
caused by the lack of channels to accommodate the number of calls.
Mr. DtSalvo reported that according to the FCC rules, the 27 chan-
nels licensed to the County are to be in use by some kind of mechanism
by September, 1994. He said the 22 channels referred to on the Region
Nine (9) Plan are for planning purposes only, and those channels are
also lost in September, 1994 if other people need to utilize them.
According to Mr. DtSalvo, the FCC rules state that the County can
only Justify 100 mobiles/portables for one channel.
Mr. DiSalvo disclosed the real issue is, if the County does not
use the channels, based on 100 mobiles per channel, before the
September deadline, and other entitles are In need of those channels,
those channels will be lost.
It was Mr. DiSalvo's estimation that if it is decided that pot-
table coverslie is required for Public Safety, that eight (8) sites
would be re~lred to penetrate the buildings. He further stated that
the height of the tower does not help with building penetration.
Mr. DiSalvo stated that if the County has eight (8) sites with 15
Page 24
February 15, 1994
to 20 channels, and there are only two (2) or three (3) channels per
Nulttcast Site, that would be an Insufficient amount, based on the
number of un.[ts Public Safety uses during a busy hour. He revealed
there are approximately 300 units, which normally requires between
and 12 channe!s.
Commissioner Constantine contended that the Board is looking at 27
channels and the Sheriff has been requesting the additional 20 chan-
Mr. DiSa]vo replied that with the Multicast System, the number of
channels are divided between sites and that Is all you can get,
however, with the Simulcast System, those channels are reusable
.everywhere, and 20 channels can be installed at each site if desired.
Commissioner Saunders asked if the overall objectives of the State
are to develop a state-wide system, and if Collier County decided to
go with the Simulcast System, could that system in some way become a
~li:'component part of the State's System?
Mr. DiSalvo replied it could if the County goes with the APCO
Project 25 version.
In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. DiSalvo stated that
since the State has already gone to the new digital radios, the mini-
mal risk is to go with the newer digital technology.
Commissioner Volpe asked If Mr. DISalvo has determined that the
County cannot achieve a minimum of 90 percent building penetration
with the MuJ. ttcast System at four (4) tower locations, and that at
least eight (8) tower sites will be necessary to achieve 90 percent
penetration, to which Mr. DtSalvo replted in the affirmative.
According to Commissioner Volpe, building penetration and not
~".~:coverage ts the significant issue for the populace and the Public
Safety Departments.
Respondin~ to Commissioner Norris, Mr. DISalvo clarified that if
there are five (5) repeaters in the Multicast System, there can only
be five {5) simultaneous communications at that site, therefore, going
to a Multicast System is not an efficient use of frequencies.
53'
February 15, 1994
Mr. DiSalvo concluded if the County requires up to 15 conver-
sations, repeaters will have to be Installed that will do the Job. He
further stated that the County does not have the frequencies that will
Justify 10 or 15 everywhere, except for Simulcast.
County Manager Dotrill commented on the Division of Communications'
lack of response to previous requests for information regarding this
In response to comments made by County Manager Dorrtll and
Commissioner Constantine, Mr. DtSalvo replied he believed that the
County was requesting the hiring of an engineering consultant firm
that could take the issue from requirements, bid process, evaluation,
and be on site for the Installation, which Is a two (2) or three (3)
year effort.
Mr. D/Salvo explained that he helped the County acquire the E. F.
i!i~/ Johnson System, and that he has answered questions the County has
'asked in the past.
'.::' ' Mr. Jerry Schuette of Ericsson General Electric Company, spoke at
. this time. He noted there are two (2) major issues to address, one
:'ill.being the frequency Issue. Mr. Schuette reported that they have
· placed systems into effect using both technologies. He pointed out
that if the County had the Multicast System and required County-wide
coverage for an emergency, it would use a tremendous amount of resour-
ces. He further stated that to get In-building coverage, at least
· /eight (8) sites would be necessary. Mr. Schuette concluded his com-
'f party can be competitive and would like the opportunity to propose a
bid.
Coutsstoner Saunders asked Mr. Schuetts what procedure he would
': [ recommend that the Board of County Commissioners take, citing the time
)~i~!..constratnts the County is under.
Mr. Schuette stated that it is his belief that the County should
find an Independent consultant that could specify the criteria to
develop a system that meets the County's needs. Mr. Schustte further
Indicated that this is a time consuming'process and could take longer
Page 26
.'
~ebruary 15, 1994
than six (6) months, in addition, the bid process could take from 60
to 90 days.
Commissioner Volpe Inquired at what point the Board of County
Commissioners would factor in what cost would be affordable?
Commissioner Constantine suggested a decision be made after a
lunch break.
oee Recessed 12=15 P,M. - Rsconvaned 1:05 P.M. see
Sheriff Hunter stated that Mr. DiSalvo brought up an important
· 'point regarding the extra 22 frequencies that will be lost with the
other frequencies when the County goes through the re-application pro-
ces8 of September, lgg4, noting that even if the frequencies are added
to a ~fulttcast System, there would only be a total of four (4) conver-
sations added per site. He disclosed that the Sherlff~a Office Is
capable of four (4) conversations per site currently. He concluded
that with the proper Heeds Survey and a proper Engineering Survey, the
Sherlff's Office could demonstrate to the Board what is actually
needed to accommodate Public Safety tntercouunicatton.
Sheriff Hunter thanked Mr. DiSalvo for taking time out of his busy
schedule to be at the Board Meeting and reminded the Board the
Division of Communications has been very responsive to Collier County,
and that they have responded each time we have asked them for
,assistance.
Sheriff Hunter's parting recommendation to the Board was that the
Board constdor the acquisition of the services of a professional
electrical engineering consultant, who can work with the County to
provide for the bid specifications and the complete process, through
to acceptance of the new system that will provide for all the govern-
mental and public safety needs of Collier County.
Sheriff Hunter further requested that the Board include Public
Safety in the discussions pertatntn~ to the Needs Survey and the Bid
Specifications, before they are generated, as well as the Request For
Proposal (RF'P). Sheriff Hunter assured the Board he would like to be
fully involved In the entire process.
Page 27
February 15, 1994
Commissioner Saunders thanked Sheriff Hunter and commented that
everyone involved has had one objective in mind, to provide the best
Public Safety Radio System in the most cost effective way possible.
Commissioner Saunders suggested two choices the Board might con-
sider; either to ask the vendors to design a system and make a propo-
sal to the Board; or to ask Staff to assist the Board in selecting a
qualified electrical engineer to assist in developing the Bid
.Specifications.
In response to Commissioner Saunders, Norris IJams, Emergency
Services Administrator, acknowledged that Staff could come back next
week with a firm recommendation. Although he does not believe that
Staff should develop Bid Specifications, he recommended that the
'ivendors design the system, and submit their proposals to the Board.
He stated that this could be done in a shorter period of time than
hiring an engineer/consultant, which may take them past the September
deadline.
Commissioner Saunders reported that the Board is relying on County
.:'Manager Dotrill and County Attorney Cuyler to be in touch with the FCC
and to insure that there are no problems in retaining the 27 channels.
Mr. Hoffay suggested that the Board retain an electrical engineer
who could be responsible to Collier County to follow the system
through the bad process, Implementation, assessing the system after it
is in place to assure it meets the criteria, and then to manage the
system once it Is in operation.
County Manager Dorrill responded that Staff has contemplated the
: need for a full-time Contracts Administrator who can oversee the
various County contracts, in advance of October 1, 1994.
In response to Mr. Hoffay, Commissioner Saunders acknowledged that
the Board has been assured that there is no conflict of interest in
a/lowing Mr. Hoffa¥ to handle a contract for Collier County.
Sheriff Hunter stated that the Request For Proposal (RFP) idea may
sound good, ho~;ever, the Board members would not be able to look at
Page 28
February 15, 1994
!ithose proposals with any degree of technical accuracy to determine if
met the criteria. He revealed that this is his reasoning for
recommending the independent engineer/consultant to assist with speci-
fication drafting, evaluation of the proposals and follow through to
acceptance.
Commissioner Saunders asked if County Manager Derrill could find a
· qualified technical person for the Staff, and to have that person eva-
justs the proposals to insure that all specifications are met, without
hiring an independent firm to develop the specification, thereby expe-
diting matters and hiring their own staff person.
Sheriff Hunter admonished that the County retain the valuable eer-
vices of an engineer/consultant to define the actual needs and parame-
ters of the County before receiving proposals from vendors. He
suggested that if the vendor is allowed to submit a proposal by inter-
viewing the ~ublic Safety Agencies and Local Government, and then put
a proposal together, those proposals may be unresponsive to actual
engineering requirements. He suggested moving quickly to get a con-
sultant in place versus the lengthy hiring process.
Commissioner Constantine agreed with Commissioner Volpe stating
that the primary concern is to establish a radio system that meets all
the criteria for the Public Safety Agencies as cost effectively as
possible. He revealed that he is convinced that the existing system
can be expanded.
Commissioner Constantine revealed that he does not want to elimt-
':~'nate any options at this point
Sheriff Hunter reported that he Is convinced that the existing
system is expandable, however, he doubts the system can be expanded
for Public Safety Agencies. He revealed that the Public Safety
Agencies currently have the capability of utilizing four (4) frequen-
cies and stated that if the expansion into a 27 channel M~lttcast
System reduces their capabilities to two (2) channels, that would be a
major step backward.
Sheriff Hunter reported that Jacksonville is currently going
000P,' : 57
Page 29
February 15, 1994
Page 30
through the Bond Redemption process. He declared that he could fore-
sea the Board of County Commissioners facing the same thing if they
decide to pursue Request For Proposals (RFP'e) from vendors,
requesting that the vendor provide criteria for a usable system,
without first defining the criteria that will meet all the needs of
the County.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Sheriff Hunter pointed
out that Martin County has a single site system, and theoretically
Collier County could use all 27 frequencies in a single site system,
if it were possible to get the portable coverage, however, Collier
County has been told by the engineers of the State of Florida that it
must have 8 sites to provide for the 90 percent coverage needed. He
stated that Collier County and Martin County involve two different
types of systems. He declared Martin County has mobile coverage,
however, they did not do the proper ground work and lack portable
coverage, which the Collier County Law Enforcement Officers use the
Sheriff Hunter requested that the Board seek portable coverage for
the ~blto Safety Agencies of Collier Oount¥, seek competitive bids,
and receive assistance in defining the needs.
Commissioner Norris agreed with Sheriff Hunter, stating that the
Board needs an engineering firm to help develop the Request For
Proposal (RFP). He revealed that he is not comfortable with allowing
the vendors to design the system for the County. Commissioner Norris
stated that the Board needs the Independence of an outside firm with
the technical know/edge to build the Request For Proposal (RFP), for
the protection of the taxpayers. He cited the time constraints and
suggested lzuaediate action.
Co~ehtm.t~-~e~ Norrim ~ that an engineering firma be contracted
to ~lop a ~t For Proposal (~P), and o~tltne the charac-
tewi~tt~ ~g ~e~i~n criteria the County nee~ to function In m Public
Sa~aty envt.vo~ent.
In response to comments made by Commissioner Saunders and
February 15, 1994
Commissioner Norris, Commissioner Constantine suggested that the Board
make the final decision regarding the choice of engineering firms.
· :' C~luloner Norris ~oved, seconded b~ Co--issionsr Saunders, that
the ~ex~of County Couleelonere ~aks the final selection of the
Mr. Camell assured Commissioner Saunders that Staff could
complete the selection process and be back in front of the Board by
the end of March.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Saunders stated
that it is his understanding that the motion is for Staff to come
back to the Board with a list of engineering firms and their quotes
for developing the bid specifications.
Commissioner Matthews cautioned that the County should not design
the system on its own, or hire a third party to design the system.
She stated she would like the vendors to be intricately involved in
the design, with someone overseeing the process.
Cos~aiutoner Norris clarified that the intent of the ~otion does
not include any de~i~n work to be done at this point.
County 14anager Dotrill verified his understanding is that there
will not be traditional plans or specifications prepared by the
i. Board~s engineer, noting that the engineer will provide a generic
technical list of requirements and then allow the various technologies
of the vendors to take place.
County ~{anager Dorrill advised that Staff is precluded from
bringing price quotes back to the Board as part of the engineer sslec-
· tton process, stating that Staff can short list, but they cannot soli-
cit a fee proposal.
Commissioner Volpe inquired regarding who will make the final
determination between what is essential and what is desirable, citing
cost as the determining factor.
County Manager Dotrill suggested that within the Request For
Proposals (RFP's) there could be a base bid and a series of add alter-
nates, allowing flexibility to meet the budget.
Page 31
February 15, 1994
Commissioner Constantine agreed with Commissioner Volpe'e concerns
regarding the difference between what is essential and what is
desirable. He remarked that the County has an existing system, and
that it has been suggested that the current system can fulfill the
" Cou~nty*e needs. therefore, is there a way of pursing that issue, not
only from a monetary standpoint, but it could possibly alleviate the
concern regarding the September 30, 1994 deadline, and assure that the
.
Co~t~ wou~d keep ~ts channels.
Sheriff Hunter responded that Mr. Hoffa~ has not addressed whethe=
the existing system, expanded or not, can mee~ the needs of ~bl~c
Safety in Collier County. He stated that the requeot of the
Safety Agencies is for a basic in~er-governmental system that will
con,cate between the ~blic Safety Agencies w~th some additional
features (is: a pre-emptory button that could be utilized in emergen-
cies allow~n~ a ~blIc Safety Official the ability to get on a channel
~n ~fe threatening situat~ons).
Sheriff ~ter s~a~ed that In the pas~ his request for funding of
~ 800 ~z s%,stem was not presented to the Board of County
'~ Co~ss~oners.
Co~t~ M~ager Dotrill countered tha~ ever~ non-reco~ended
re~est Is presented ~o the Board of County Co~ssloners ever~ year
as part of their deliberations. He further stated that the Board of
Co~ty Co~ss~oners ultimately dec,des what the needs are for any
[.. ~bl~c Safety System.
Co~ss~oner Constantine asked Mr. Hoffay ~f the existing system,
e~ther in ~ts ~rrent form or expanded form, has the ability to meet
the needs of the ~bl~c Safety Agencies of Collier Co~ty, to which
M~. Hoffay answered in the affirmative, if they conform to the APC0 ~6
Ply, which represents the needs of Public Safety In any County.
In response to Sheriff Hunter, Mr. Hoffay e~ated APCO 16 does not
address specific needs ~ch as coverage, ~t addresses capabilities.
~ ~ld ~1~ ~ eng~r~n~ f~ to help develop a ~t of
~:,'11 ' develop plan~ end btd on the system for Collier County.
Commissioner Volpe stated that once the engineering consultant
comes up witIt those specifications based on the needs and wants, the
County will be forced Into one system or the other, Irrespective of
the cost.
'Mr. Camell suggested the Board direct the consultant to prepare a
performance ~pectftcatton that does not preclude one technology over
the other, it simply calls for end results, then the evaluation beco-
mes focused on what system meets the specified performance require-
ment.
Responding to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Herfay stated that It
Is his belief that a hybrid system could not be created using the
existing backbone system the County now has.
Responding to Commissioner Constantineto inquiry regarding his
motion, Cosst#toner Norris replied that the 800 ~ Committee should
~ork with the consultant to establish the criteria, and that the Board
of C~,%~Co~teeionere will ~ake the final decision.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Norris Indicated
that one of the primary functions of the engtneeDing firm should be to
give the Board of County Commissioners ~utdance regarding the cost of
the new system.
Commissioner Constantine declared he intends to vote against the
motion, nottn~ that one of the ways to approach the FCC deadline is to
. pursue expansion of the current system, which would also save tax
dollars.
Upon call for the question, the ~otton failed 2/3 (Commissioners
Volp~, Con~twlttne and M~tth~ opposed).
Commissioner Volpe Inquired whether there to a way to have the
vendors respond to the essential requirements identified by the Public
Safety Agencies, indicating that APCO 16 does not address the Issue of
coverage, penetration and the number of tower sites needed.
Mr. John DiSalvo, Division of Communications, disclosed that the
oo, 000P,' : 61
Page 33
February 1,5, 1994
determining factor regarding cost wall be in the number of channels
and the nuaber of sites. He suggested that the consulting engineering
firm compile a list, clearly defining the mandatory and desirable
features. He stated that the consulting engineer could then give the
Board a Budgetary Analysis based upon those parameters.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Hr. DiSalva disclosed
that the cost will be two or three times higher than the
$11,000,000.00 quoted in the report, if the channels were increased
from 10 channels to 27 channels.
Commissioner Volpe disclosed his concern regarding the acquisition
of the 27 channels assigned to Collier County. He noted that Mr.
' DISalva has questioned whether the Board of County Commissioners As
"' entitled to the 27 channels and the possibility that the Board will
not be able to acquire those channels.
Mr. DiSalva stated that Collier County may be able to acquire bet-
ween ~5 and 20 channels, based on the number of mobiles, portables and
control stations. He explained that is the reason he concluded that
the Simulcast System would be the better system for Collier County.
Castleeisner Saunders ~oved, to direct Staff to work with the
Ccr~catton~ Co~ittee, Sheriff ~ter ~d ~. D~Salvo to d~lop
t~ ~~ate ~rfo~ce criteria, g~v~ng the ve~or. a ~1~
of ~t t~ C~W Is l~ki~ for~ to .k the vendors to p~e pro-
po~alo b~s4d on tho~e general guidelines; and to direct County Manager
Do~rlll t~m find m qualtfte~ person to be hired as a Staff ~ber to
help mm~ tl~ w~tmm and evaluate the vmndor*a proFoemla.
Commissioner Constantine declared that he would like the perfer-
mi mance criteria to be brought back to the Board for review before At
!.' is sent out to the vendors for proposals.
Commissioner Matthews requested that the last of criteria be
prioritized according to what is mandatory and what is desired.
In reepon~ to Commissioner Constantine, Sheriff Hunter remarked
that Staff should be able to bring the performance criteria before the
board in two [2) weeks for review.
Page 34
February 15, 1994
Two {2) week~ tl~ board ~11 r~t~ the ~rfo~ce criteria,
~~t~ Vol~ ~econded the
Chief Peterson, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue Dlstr~ct, ada-
mantly asked that they be involved in the process, noting that the
Fire Department As a potential user.
In response to Co~Aes~oner Volpe, Assistant County Attorney
~.jWeigel stated that the process of solicitation will allow for com-
pe~itAve
Co~ty Manager Dotrill remarked that the Board of County
' Co~issioners will be takin~ competitive proposals that will have
dollar value, and that there wall be sealed proposals as part of the
bad process, which wall be evaluated by the Board, the Board will then
direct Staff to proceed w~th the firm that As selected and to ne~o-
-tiate the final contract.
~~c~= S~r~ ~d t~ ~tion ~ating t~t the ~d
of ~ ~~i~rs will accept the re~rt fro~ RI~ Ci~
~~ti~ ~, Inc..
~~lc~ Vol~ ~cond~ the ~d ~ton on the
see ~: 2:15 P.N. - Reco~ned: 2:20 P.M. at ~tch
R~I~ ~~ ~blrettt replac~ Recording 8ecret~ ~rz
(~)
It~l
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~R DESI~ S~ICES ~R ~ 93-2121,
CO~ ~GI~ N~~R ~~ FACILI~ - ~E I, T~E A ~ C
Tom Conrecode, OCPM Director, explained that this contract is in
response to RFP 93-2121 for the design services for the South County
Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility. He stated that Staff has
worked to define the limited scope in the first phases of the
Agreement to leave the Contract open to address subsequent phases of
the work based on the Board~s direction. He requested that the Board
Page 35
February 15, 1994
~:.'~Japprove the contract. He noted that some minor Issues must be
resolved with the Attorney's Office and that the Contract would be
brought back on the Consent Agenda once the issues are resolved.
Commissioner Norris pointed out that the Conditional Use Permit
Application and the Deep Well Injection for Phase I are far beyond the
.intent of the Board which was to do the remedial actions regarding the
odor and chlorine storage.
Mr. Conrecode stated that the work for Phase I, specifically odor
control, effluent disinfection, Capacity Analysis Report and Design
Report is the first major look at the operation and possible expansion
of the exl~ittng facility.
Commissioner Matthews recalled that the purpose for Phase I was to
address the odor, noise and chlorine. She voiced concern that the
Contract would give the contractor authorization to do more than solve
these problems.
Mr. Conrecode stated that a step-by-step approach could be used.
He noted that the odor control and capacity analysis will be used in
the Conditional Use for expansion if necessary.
Commissioner Matthews ind~cated that the firm is large enough to
work on many Issues concurrently. She stated that the three big
issues should be remedied first.
Commissioner Volpe agreed and reminded the Board of the problems
with beach renourishment and Coastal Engineering.
Mr. Conrecode remarked that the RFP was worded very carefully to
encompass the entire scope of the project so that the Board would have
the flexibility to break up the work.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Assistant County Attorney
Wetgel replied that this contract draft addresses the different pha-
ses, however he pointed out that the first phase of this contract is
more ~ncluslve than what the Board desires.
Commlss~cner Volpe remarked that the results of the different pha-
ses will come back before the Board who will then determine if the
problems are corrected.
Page 36
February 15, 1994
County Manager Dorrill referred to pages 37 and 38 of the execu-
rive summary and announced this is the schedule of the Contract. He
said that the work that needed to be done in order to address the
[~ Board~a concerns would Include individual tasks wlthtn Phase I. He
stated that It is his understanding that Task A1, A2 and A3 will be
done before going further toward the $750,000.00 estimate for Phase I,
because if the main concerns are not resolved there is no need to
spend the additional montes.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, County Manager Dorrtll
replied that if after the initial fee of $172,000.00 Is paid and the
tasks are completed, the Board finds that the major concerns have not
'. been resolved, the Contract will be terminated.
Mr. Dotrill stated that the Board can authorize the Contract today
assf~ntng the Task breakdown and authorize a specific dollar amount to
assure that the concerns are addressed.
0o~u~tsstoner Matthews stated that Phase I encompasses all the
tasks. She revealed that the Contract as presented does not require
the contractor to return to the Board at the end of each task.
County Manager Dotrill reiterated that the Board can initiate any
controls they feel are necessary.
Mr. Conracode noted that the Deep Injection Well for effluent
disposal may proceed concurrently with other issues.
Thomas Taylor, Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc., described a ache-
dule of times that various tasks of Phase I would be performed. He
explained that the Preliminary Engineering Report will address the
~4;r'' disinfection concerns, odor issues and identify alternative solutions
with the costs Involved. He stated that the Design Report would not
~;; start until the conclusion of the County review process.
' Tape#4
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Taylor replied that the
Board can hold off on the cost for the Conditional Use.
Commissioner Norris remarked that the Board does not want to con-
sider any expansion until the existing 'problems are solved.
Page 37
February 15, 1994
/~i[' County Manager Dorrtll confirmed that the Board may choose the
task and the order in which the task is funded. He recommended that
the Board approve the Contract and authorize funding for Task A in
/(,order to demonstrate to the public that no funds wall spent beyond the
Preliminary Engineering Report to resolve the problems associated with
· .f ;' < the Plant.
Commissioner Constantine agreed, however, questioned the ability
to do that according to the contract.
Assistant County Attorney Welgel stated that the Contract is being
reconfl~ured to clarify that point.
Commissioner Volpe revealed that the intent of the Board was to
· trend to Phase I. He stated that the Advisory Committee/Odor Panel
should be included in the process.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Taylor confirmed that the
majority of the ?20 day time schedule is devoted to the construction
and permitting activity associated with the Deep Injection Well.
Co~iuloner Matthews ~oved to approve Phase X, Tuk A ~nd Tuk C
·nd to dire~ct Staff to develop · tl~e mchedule for the rmining
Commissioner Norris commented that the problems must be corrected
before the commencement of any additional work.
~~lo~l' NoirIs seconded the ~otion.
~ call for the question, the ~otion carried unantmly.
A short discussion was held regarding the possible expansion of
the facility.
Page 38
Februar~ ~5~ ~994
COLLIER COUNTY C~B~g T~LEV/SIOR FR&I~CHZS~ O~Z~
~~ 1, 1994
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
January 27, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, ~blic hearing was opened.
Commissioner Constantine noted that both Staff and Colony
Cablevision have suggested that this item be postponed In order to
continue discuss/on.
County Manager Dotrill suggested that members of the public be
heard today and allow for the item to be continued.
Assistant County Attorney Ashton stated that Staff Is willing to
continue because they have received information from the cable opera-
tors today which requires further discussion.
Ms. Ashton gave a brief overview of the amendments Including
Gross Revenues, Franchise Application Fees, Annual Franchise Payments
to Monthly Franchise Payments and Changes in Customer Service
Standards.
Ms. Ashton reported that the customer service standards proposed
by the County Manager's Cable Committee are more stringent than the
FCC standards which the County adopted in late 1993.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Ashton replied that most of
the proposed amendments would not effect the franchisees because of
the current Franchise Agreement which is in effect until 1997.
The following people spoke on the issue:
Ronald Kaufman Richard Gunter
Kenneth Fuchs
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Assistant County Attorney
Ashton recalled that Staff has been working with Colony Cablevision
since November.
!i!~-'i' ' Commissioner Matthews remarked that since this Item has been
discussed since November, a postponement of two weeks is adequate.
Co~edmmto~er Matthew~ ~oved, seconded by Commtasiona~ S~und~rm to
67
Paga 39
:',: contim Bl,~ item to kch 2, 2gg4.
Commissioner Norris requested an explanation as to why Staff
feels that the Courttyre standards must be more stringent than FCC
· regulations.
Commissioner Volpe concurred with Commissioner Norris.
Commissioner Matthews expressed concern with the new executive
aummar~ that was adopted in December which asked specific information
such as was it mandated, by whom, at what cost and what are the bene-
fits7 She requested that this information be provided.
~ call for the question, the notion corrled
~.:~ (1440)
It,
~YPPLIMIBTAL A~RKKMENT NO. 7 WITH NESTWIND CONTRACTIN(J, INC. FOR
CONSTRUCTION IMPROVI3~XNTS TO IPiqOKALKE ROAD BKTWEKN U.S. 41 AND T--75 --
APPROVED IN ~r~ AMOUNT OF 0119,035.93
Tom Conrecode, OCPM Director, explained that this item specifi-
cally addresses a $119,035.93 change due to additional work and modi-
fications on the four lantng of Immokalee Road. He acknowledged a
typographical error in the recommendation in the executive summary
which notes $199,035.93, and confirmed that the amount is $119,035.93.
Mr. Concrecode stated that Supplemental Agreement No. ? grants 17
additional days associated with these changes.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Conracode explained that
the completion date on page 2 is not correct, and should be the end of
April, 1994 which includes rain days and the 17 additional days.
Commissioner Matthews commented that she does not see how that
completion date will be met.
:::. Mr. Conracode confirmed that the project will meet the completion
~!!' date.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conrecode confirmed that
' the work in ~estion has already been completed.
In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conracode stated that he is
not aware of any outstanding issues between the County and the
Contractor that relate to the work covered in this Change Order.
Page 40
February XS, 1994
Coo~i~1o~er Volpe rioveal, eeconded by Coo~ssioner Saunderm and
carried unaniaouely, that Suppleeental Agreenent No. 7 be approved.
Page 41
ct~rte~m~ni~ov~l¥, that the tam for Dougl~ L. Rank~n, Ntctml
· ~dmhsmdltol~rt T. Fr~edm~nn to the County aoverm~nt Productivity
Co~tAttee be approvwd, thereby adopting Reeolutton 94-80.
Page 42
Pebruary :15, :1994
~-',~'It~OLUT'~O]I 94-82 ]I~=I~O]:ITX!'(] MAX A.
TIN ~~ ~ OIB C. ~L~ TO
Administrative Assistant to the Board Fllson reported that there
are five appointments to be made to the Parks and Recreation Advisory
'Board.
Max A. Hesse, Jr., spoke on the subject.
Upon selection of the members for appointment to the Parks and
Recreation Advisory, Co~lieeloner Norrim ~oved, seconded b~
:j CommAsSonar Natthewl and carriedunanimously, that Max&. Hesse, Jr.,
Bruce&. Pray, Stephen J. Klee, Tim Blackford and Oil C. Mueller be
· appointed to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, thereb~ adopting
8.1.
Page 43
FeBruary 15, 1994
Administrative Assistant to the Board Ftlson revealed that there
Is one vacant term to be appointed to fulfil/ the remainder of a vacant
i/ term on the ~nvlronmenta! Policy Technical Advisory Board (EPTAB).
Ms. Ftlson noted that Staff recommends the appointment of Dr. Jon
'.~ ' Staiger.
Commissioner Norris voiced concern regarding the fact that Dr.
Statger iN a City employee.
Commissioner Matthews and Commissioner Constantine concurred with
this concern.
Commissioner Matthews remarked that the Chairman of EPTAB has
· expressed his desire to have a Land Use Attorney as a member of the
i' Board and requested that the vacancy be readverttsed.
Commissioner Constantine stated that the policy has always been
not to readretries as long as there is a number of qualified appli-
cants.
GazTtodunsntmously, that Derek Rodgin be appointed to the
!~vironment~l Policy Technical i~visory Board, thereby adopttn~
Resolution 94-82.
Page 44
Admintstrat~ve Assistant to the Board Fllson reported that one
member must be appointed to represent the at-large category, one
member must be appointed by the Marco Island Taxpayerst Association
and one member by the Marco Island Chamber of Commerce.
Comedesigner Norrte moved, seconded b~ ¢omtee~one~ Matth~ and
C~ZTt~~t~n~I~, tO appoint Robert Duklaner for the at-l~r~
tton, reappoint Victoria #~11t~ ~ recommended by the M~rco leland
Cl~a~d~r of Commerce, and reappoint JoAnne Logua Ruettzk~
m~nded b~ the Marco Island Taxpayer's Aaeoctatton, thereb~ adopting
Re~olutton
Page 45
Administrative Assistant to the Board Filson revealed that there
is a vacancy on the City/County Beach Renourishment Committee. She
orated that Staff recommends the reappointment of M. Inge Johnstone.
Co~iaaloner Yelps ~oved, macended by Caniseisner Matthmel and
c~riedun~ni~ou~ly, that M, Inge Johnstone be reappointed to the
City/Co~nt~ Belch Renour~sh~ent Colulittle, thereby adopting
Resolution g4-84.
Page 46
February 15, 1994
Zteu#~01
~O~UTXO~ 94-65 AI~POI~TIIQ BLAIR A. FOLEY TO TI~ ~VXRO~ENTAL
Administrative Assistant to the Board Filson revealed that there
is a vacancy on the Environmental Advisory Board.
Co~iuAoner Norris ~oved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe and
c~rriedm~ni~l¥, that Blair A. Foley be appointed to the
.:~nvlt-~ntal Advisory Board, thereby adopting Resolution 94-85.
Page 47
(2021)
February 15, 1994
FOR Tl~ XNFRAETRUCTURE OF MARCO XSLAND - STAFF TO ~VALUATE
T~) DEVELOP MASTER PLAN AND P~PORT FINDINGS TO TH~ BCC
Commissioner Norris reported that members of the Marco Island
Civic Association (MICA) voiced concern regarding the long term plans
for infrastructure. He stated that MICA has suggested developing a
Master Plan for Marco Island.
The following people spoke on the subject:
Harold Vann Fay Biles
Commissioner Saunders agreed that the development of a Master Plan
is good and suggested that Staff investigate this possibility.
County Manager Derrill commented that from a Program Budgeting
standpoint the Board should be aware of what additional Staff time
will be necessary to prepare it.
Commissioner Volpe stated that although he endorses the idea, he
is concerned with the amount of Staff time this additional study will
C~meloner S~mdere moved that Staff be directed to evaluate the
pt-o~ ne~-~ to ~9in the process of d~elopin9
for ~ Xsl~ includtn~ costs and ~bJect ~er. ~on~
Co~lssioner Volpe ~est~oned the time frame as to when Staff will
report back to the Board.
Co~ty Manager Dorr~l replied that Staff would report back ~n
four weeks.
~ c~3 for the ~eotion, the ~tton carried 5/0.
Commissioner Constantine suggested that a formal policy be deve-
loped to assist in the recommendation of appointments to Advisory
~" Committees.
Page 48
February 15, 1994
Co~0aissioner Constantine stated that the Collier County Planning
Commission (CCP¢) has requested that they review applicants for
their Board. He stated that the County Attorney has advised that a
formal policy would have to be adopted to permit this.
Mr. Davis, Chairman of the CCPC, spoke on the subject.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Assistant County Attorney
Student replied that this issue is more in the nature of a policy
decision.
Administrative Assistant to the Board Filson reported that there
is no formal policy at this time.
Commissioner Constantine suggested that a formal policy be deve-
loped with the exclusion of quasi-Judicial bodies.
A~ministrative Assistant to the Board Filson agreed to work with
the County Attorney's office and report back to the Board in two
weeks.
see CouLto~Aonor Saunders left the Besting at that tiBe see
Conissioner Constantine announced that he has added this item to
the agenda because if this Bill is passed the choices will be to not
proceed with beach renourishment as scheduled or to increase the
Tourist Tax. Be suggested that he forward a letter on behalf of the
Board of County Commissioners to the representatives in Tallahassee
~i' announcing o~,position to the proposed Bill changes.
It was the consensus of the Board to forward a letter of objection.
Commissioner Volpe commented that the County Attorney's office is
expected to inform the Board of pending legislation.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, County Manager Derrill
reported that his office does communicate with the Florida Association
of Counties.
(ss4s).
Xtmm
87
Page 49
February 15, 1994
U.S. J&~l$~fO~l~P~l OF ENGINEERS, R~ULATONY DIVISION,
~ ~AJ-41 - CONTINUED TO F~BRUARY 22, 1994
Commissioner Matthews revealed that she has authored a letter on
behalf of the Board of County Commissioners to the Corps of Engineers
and had it reviewed by the County Attorney for legal sufficiency. She
reported that County Attorney Cuyler has suggested changes to the
letter that she believes changes the intent and purpose of the letter.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Matthews replied
that Staff is developing a position on the issue and it will be pre-
sented at the next Board meeting on February 22, 1994.
County Manager Dotrill stated that he informed Representative
Goss' office of a possible conflicting interest between the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and the Federal Environmental Protection Agency.
Commissioner Constantine confirmed that the members of the Board
has no objection to the changes in the letter.
CS~$)
.Ztem~14&
County Manager Dorrtll announced that Staff is working on this
Issue and will report their findings to the Board.
(ssss)
DZSC~I~ T~ ~J~fD~ C~E AND SI~ SPECIFIC ~ZORS;
;'A~DH~q~fR~!3FFS-
Assistant County Attorney Student reported that the Snyder case
originates in Brevard County. She said that Snyder applied for a
site specific fezone and the Board of County Commissioners of Brevard
County recommended denial without stating any reason on the record.
She stated that the Snyders sued Brevard County and the case made its
way to the Supreme Court where it was held that a site specific fezone
As quasi-Judicial. She explained that Judicial action results in the
application of the policy.
'00K ~[~0PAGr" 8~
Page 50
February 15, !994
Asstatant County Attorney Student revealed that there te criteria
set forth for a sate specific fezone: i.e., was due proceee accorded,
were the e~sentta! requirements of the law met, and was the decision
based on competent/substantial evidence.
e~e C~tmIlcner Volpe ~d, secc~d~ ~ Co~nn~one~ S~der~ ~d
c~tg ~i~ly, t~t the following Area ~der the c~t a~n~
~CAVATION ~T ~. 59-494 '~LIC~ ~SH ~ 19
]:t.~ #16A2
It.~OLUTTO~ 94"-6~ GRANTING FINAL ACCtePTANC~ OF TI~ ROADMAY,, DRAINAGE,
i MAT'~R &,lid fT~I~R I'MPR~ FOR THE FILIAL PLAT OF 'DEVON GR.E'~N AT
See Page:., . /~
94-e4 ~ltANTIIG PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF TH~ ROADIIAY
FOR TH~ FINAL FLAT OF 'RUSTLING PINES' - NITH
&~ LX~TED IN TH~ EXECUTIVE SUI~!ARY
See Page /G /
~CO~D~: OF T~ FINAL PLAT OF "NIOGIN~ BAY VILLAS"
?
It~CORD11G OP TH~ FINAL PLAT OF "IMP~RIAL SQUARE' - N/T~ ~
~TXPOL~T~0NS AS LI~D IN THE EX~CU'fIVE SUI~!ARY; AND ACCEPTANCE OF
CONSTRUCTI0]I &RD MAIITRL~ANCI AGREE~INT OF SUBDIVISION IMPR~S
See Pages /0 ~- /O.~
T~ FINAL PLAT OF 'JAE¢IER CO~ERCIAL INDUSTRIAL
R~011>94--$~ AtFflIORZZZNG ~ &CC~fANCX OF 'CANT~ABB~' AT
T~!~'~I~, & I~T OF & PORTlOll OF & i~VIOUSBY I~CORDXD I~T
~ ~ T~I[ VIneYARDS UNIT 3
See Page~
Page 51
Zteu #16A10
RESOT, UTZ0g g4-67 &C~ROWLEDGIZlG A PJISUBDIVISION OF TRACT 121, A PORTION
0r A P~VZOUSr, Y zmcoaDm~ PT.,AT ~mer as GOLDEN GAT~ KSTATE~ UNIT NO. 8
See Pages
//o-///
' !l:11,Ot..l:l'flO!l 14-48 ,I, CI3~DGI]IG A Rr'JU~DIVIffIOR OF T1UCT 78, A PORTION
' ' OF & l~ll:l'3~Y RKCORDKD PL&T 131*OWN AS GOLDKN GATE ~STA~IS UNIT IlS. 8
, R~OLUTZO~ 94-69 ACIDIOWL~DGZWG A R~SUBDXVZSZOR OF TRACT 58, A PORTZOR
O~ & FRKVZOO:~L?R~30RDED PLA? KNOWRJLS GO~DER GATE ~$?AT~S URZ~ ~O. g?
!
3:t, J16&13
,~'; RE~0r-UTZO~ 04-70 ACI310WLEDGZNG & RE~UBDZVZgZOR 0Y TRACT 3, A PORTZOR
.' O~ & PRKVZO~T3T,~ RECORDED PL&~ KROWII &S GOLDKN GATK ~$~ATES UIIZ~ NO. 4
See Pages
!/if'
Zte~16Al¢
Of'MATER rACZLZTZES FOR PZBBLK CRKK]C AT FELlCAlf BAY - M/TH
~r*I'PUL&T*.EOIB LS LZSTKD ZNTR*K K]~CUTZVB SU)IiULRY
~ . Zteu #16&15 - Deleted
: Iq:ESOLUTZOBI'. S~4-71 AUTHORZZZNG THE A~CKPTAWCK OF "PKLZCJUI M&RSH IFRZT
'FOOR' A !~I~JtT OF A PORTION OY A FR:EVZOUSL¥ RECORDED PLAT
IvJ~ZCAII ~ U~ZT OZTg - ~ZTH THE ~FZPULATZOI~ J~ LISTED
~'UTZV~ ~I~I~IAR~; JLI~D ACCKFTJLRCE 0,~ CO)I~JTRUCTZOR AND
JtGR~l~rf OF ~UBDZVZSZON Z!,!PR0~FS
!o/13
Ztem#16Al?
RK~OLUTZON 04-72 AUT!!ORZZZNG FINAL ACCKPTARCK OF THK RO&DWAY,
DR&ZIZI~GE, I~LTKRAJFD SKWKR ZMPROVKI~:]rfS FOR THK FZNAL PLAT OF "AUDUBON
COUIrfRTCLU~, TIUtcT E, UNIT 0N~'; ~ILEASINGTHE MAZNTENA~C'~ SECURZTY
,9,31'D &~l~g T]~ NAZgTNNANCE RESPORSZBZLZTY FOR TI~ ZMPR~ NOT
~gg4
~ ~TI'IqYLA~ A~ LZ~I'KD ZN TH~ gX~CUTZV~ ~
gKC0~D~D ZN O~ B~ 192~ PAC~ 2070 - 2081
L~ 1~ RZ~-OF-~AY P~CEL NO. 2~-T, CO~ CASE
~TO COITR&CTWl~H THE CARE C~UB OY CO~ZKR COUBTY, ZWC. FOR
FOR SI31TORS (ALZHKZIqZR~ DAYCARE) ZR THE AMOUIFT OY $4,010,
ZICitEA~:I'IGTE]~ CONTRACT ANOUNT TO 820,647
See Pages .~ .'~/-
Ztem #160~ - ~ to Xt~ 88C2
:"; Zt~~ ~6D1
: ~~s OF ~l~ OF
~ ~ B~~ ~~
Item ~16D2 - Coz~ttnued to Feb~ua~ ~2, 1994 Iqeettng
Item #1611
:':' SI:LECTZOIOF ~ AWD AM&RD OF AGRI~S FOR KLECTRZCAL/Iq~CH&NZCJLT,
EIGZIKKRrlG SI3FVZCKS (RrP 93-2057) ~ DALY, GONZ&LKZ GROUP,
~, TXLDII, LOBI:ETZ & COOPER, ZNC.
See Pages //~ ~ "g:'~/~
Item d~161~
ACC~/Pr~ M~ ~TZ~CATZO~ OF ~~S ~ ~KS ~S~ZA~D ~
3~ l, 1~4 ~ ~101 OF BID ~94-2144, S~ OF ~SO~
~ZD ~ ~' ~A~
~,00K ~001~A1:;[ 91' Page 53
February 25, 2994
CEAT/~~ OF CORK~CTZOI TO TH~ 2991, 1992, 2993 AND 1994 SOLZD
IqA~T~~ON ~CZAL ASSES~I~T ROLLS AND ZSSUE ~ AS
Pages
C~qT~I~CAT~ OF ~ZON TO ~ lgg2, 2gg3 AND 1994 $OLZD
COLL~CT~O!I SPECIAL ASSESSMEFf ROLLS ~ ZSZU~ REFUNDS AS APPROFRZAT~
i'~" BUBL~AB~ AG~BE~]IT BNTWKEN COLLZEI~ COUNTY, A POLITICAL ~0BDMSZON OF
;:j" T~ ~TAT~ OF FLORIDA, AND TH~ JAT~S FOUNDATION OF NAPLES, ZNC. FOR
T~ ~ FURI~)~E OF ACCOI~!ODATINO A CONTAINER FOR RECYULABLE MATERIALS
See Pages
Deleted
FOR D~F~IDJI~'/'*S ATTO~ F~ES AND COSTS :I~R ~J~l:~]l'/'
L"'A~"~[, ~OS. 13~'.0/6'01.1 ~ 137.0/60~.2 T.,OCAT'IL'~ ]:~1' 1""B~
Ztm~lSXI, o ¢oattnued to FabruaLr~ 22, 1994 !~eettng
MZSC~2~OD~ CO!I~ESI~NDENCE - FZLBDAND/OR R~FERR~D
The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and or
,referred as presented by the Board of County Comm/sstoners:
Page 5d
-~i.f'., February 15, :[994
~ CnTIYl~Tn O~ com~c'rzo~ TO ~ ~'AX ROLLS AS
347/348
257/259
:[990 TJ.~ ROLL
1991 TAX ROLL
Date
01/24/94
01/24/94 & 02/08/94
2992 TJ~ ROLL
03/24/94 & 02/08/94
:[993 TJ~ ROLL
147/153
02/03/94 - 02/09/94
1993 TARGIBLK l~!~.,~O~ltL PROPKRTY
:[993-123 01/24/94
1993-126/127 02/08/94 & 02/10/94
RE~0LUT~0N
1991
Ztem ~16L2
/
RESOLUTZON 94-75 R]E SATZSFACTZOR 0~ LZKN ~R ACC0~ RO. 10304 ~R
2991 ~LZD I~ ~LLK~ZOM ~ DZ~S~ S~VZ~S S~CX~
Item ~16T.3
RESOLOI~OI~ 94-76 RE SATZSFACTIOR OF LIEN FOR ACCOUFF NO. 16159 FOR
1991 SOLID lqAfeZ'E COLLK~ION AJID DZ:~S~ S~ZCKS S~CZ~
THAT l&$ PLACED A(IAZJ~ST ~ PROPERTY Z]I KRROR
1994
RKSOLUT~O~ 9,l-71 RE SATXSFACTZON OF LTKN FOR ACCOUNT WO. 7252
See Pages
There b~ng no further bus~neeo for the Good of the County,
: meeting was ~tdJourned by Order of the Ch&~r - Time:
the
BOARD OF Z~NG APPKALS/KX
OFFICIO/~OVERNING BOARD(S)
~PEC~ DISTRICTS UNDKR/~TS//
as presented
'":'~' / or as corrected
Page 56