Loading...
BCC Minutes 03/01/1994 R Nap]es, Florida, March 1, 1994 ~LZT IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in ~b~ the County of Collier and also acting as the Board of Zoning )aais and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as been created according to law and having conducted business met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION In Building Of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the ~ollowing members present: CHAIRMAN: Timothy J. Constantine VICE-CHAIRMAN: Betrye J. Matthews John C. Norris Michael J. Volpf., Burr L. Saunder~ ~SO PRESENT: John Yonkosky, Finance Director; Charlene Merz, :biretti and Marilyn Fernlay, Recording Secretaries; Nell County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Dave Weigel, David Bryant, and Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorneys; George Archibald, Transportatio~ Services Administrator; William Hargett, %ss~stant County Manager; Bill Lorenz, Environmental Services ; Jennifer Edwards, Assistant to the County Mana~;er; Arnold, Acting Chief of Planning and Engineering; Robert Acting Current Planning Manager; Michael Smykowskt, Acting Director; Ron Cook, Utilities Finance Director; Mike McNees, Utilities Administrator; Dick Clark, Community Development ~minietrator; Greg Mihalic, Affordable Housing Director; Sue Filson, ,ative Assistant to ~he Board; Tim Clemons, Wastewater ; David Russell, Acting Solid Waste Director; Sheriff Don and Deputy Rosa Hernandez White, Shertff's Office. Pag,.~ 1 #I :a2a)- ,~, k;~.APPR0V~D WITH CKAN~IW.S March 1, 1994 Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews and 4/0 .(Co.~lssloner Norris out), to approve the agenda with the a~ detailed on the A!]enda Change Sheet, ~d the followin~ Item #I6B1 Moved to Item #8B2 - Lease Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and the Florida State Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. Item #16B2 Moved to Item #8B3 - Lease Agreement between MJC Management, Inc. and,Collier County for the purpose of uti- lizing a portion of ~he Everglades City Airport for the pur- pose of conducting a bicycle rental business. Item #16G2 Moved to Item #8G4 - Appointment of the Count¥'s external auditors to perform audits of the Solid Waste Collection Services Franchises. Item #16H4 Moved to Item #8H4 - Award of contract for Professional Service~; Agreement for field survey and aerial photography services re four-laning of Golden Gate Blvd. from CR-951 running east approximately 5-1/4 miles ~o 2nd Street N.E. (! block past Wilson Blvd.). Col~lisltoner Volpe moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews, and 4/0 (Oolul~ssioner Norris out), to continue Item 8~! until the DOA hearing. Page 2 March 1, 1994 :"'The motion for approval of the consent agenda is noted under Item 33o) ~tlm SERVICE AWARDS - ~'RI~SENTED Commissioner Saunders congratulated and presented Service Awards the following employees for service with Collier County Government: Gregory D. Harrison 5 years Road and Bridge Rudy M. Luna 5 years Utilities Water ,~RO~JLAMATION DESIGNATING TH~ MONTH OF MARCH, 1994, AS NATIONAL MIDDLE EDUCATION MONTH - ADOPTED Upon reading the Proclamation, Commissioner Volpe moved, oeconded Commissioner Matthews and carried 4/0 (Commissioner Norris out), thl ~oclmt~on des~nat~ng the Month of Ma,rch, 1994, 'Nlt~o~l M~ddle Level Education Month be adopted. Mr. Santo H. P/no, Director of Middle and H~gh School Program Services with Collier County Public Schools accepted the proclamation. Page 3 BUDGET A!,G[NDHENT 94-2.1,3 -- &DOPTED March 1, 1994 '~:~.Conaiselonmr Volpe acted, seconded by Co--ltssionsr Matthews and 4/0 (Cootsstonez, Norris out), that Budget Amendneat 94-213 be ) ON R~FENU~$ FOR T~H FIRST QUARTER OF FISCAL 1994 - PRESENTED Michael Smykowskt, Acting Budget Director stated that overall the quarter of 1994 was a very strong quarter. He revealed that ':" ~ Intergovernmental Revenues the Budget Office is estimating an nal $1.6 Million in Revenue Sharing and Sales Tax Proceeds ; will accrue to the benefit of the General Fund and will provide %some flexibility in either Increasing reserves, off setting ad valorem Or funding additional programs. '~. Mr. Smykowski noted that the first quarter Road Impact Fees are mbove. budget, due to a few large commercial building Farmitel being '.processed in the first quarter. i Mr. Smykowski further stated that the Landfill Tipping Fees are :~} - slightly due to less waste being processed at the Landfill sites ae well as the $5.00 per ten reduction in Constructfon/Demolit~on He disclosed that lhere is a corresponding reduction on the side as the contractor is paid $5.00 per ton less. · Co=u~issioner Volpe inquired regarding the decrease in revenue of ;r.oximately 16% in the Tourist Development Tax. Mr. Smykowsk! ~pl~ed it is not a trend, noting that an ultra conservative approach taken in budgeting that item. He stated that there is riot a good , ' from the first quarter because there is only one or two months actuals. ? .In response to tommiss, toner Yelps, Mr. Smykowski dtsclo~ed that '~.~ro~ection for the year for EMS Impact Fees shows a shortage of · which is due to the predominately single family permits that Page 4 March ]., 1994 have been issued. He noted that there are no large projects budgeted the EMS Impact Fee Fund. He explained that the single family pay smaller EMS Impact Fees. Co~uaissioner Matthews called attention to the Tourist D,.-velopment noting a negative variance of 15.8~ with the budget showing a 39% · Anttease for the year. She asked if tourism would be that (.;ood in the 9 months, to which Mr. Smykowskt replied in the affirmative. Mr. Smykowskt reported that Staff is not recommending any changes, :i~herefore, the Board will only need to accept the report at this time. eeo) I~ORT - NO ACTlOll TAKEN Finance Director Yonkosky stated the Clerk's Report is for tnfor- purposes FIHA~CIAL INFORMATION AS O~ J~Y al, 1~94 - ACOgPTED '~ Finance Director Yonkosky pointed out that the Year to Date Expenditure Report does not include encumbrances in the amount of ,~1~,5~8.00 as of January 31, 1994. He pointed out that the amount 'e~fle¢~ed u/~der FY 1994 OVER (UNDER) Funds Available should be by ~? Mr. Yonkosk¥ explained that there is $43,497.00 of unidentified ~C~Albrances on the Year to Date Expenditure Report for the Area General iFund. · ~.M · Yonkosky reported that the reason that only $10,000 revenue is :ted %%~der Taxes/CATV F:ranchise Fees on the Revenue Report for Unincorporated Area Geueral Fund, is becau,~e that money ~lenerally 'Co~es ~n m~ the end of February or ~he f~rs~ 15 days of March. He ~6ted tha~ ~he bulk of the money will be in by the end of March. ~ /'Re~ardin~ the 800 MHz ]~und Account Fees, Mr. Yonkosky pointed out ~here is $120,000 in th,: budget, and actual cash received during ~he fArs~ four (4) months is 23,392. Page 5 March 1, 1994 Finance Director Yonko~k¥ explained that the Road Impact Fees are due to a large development in progress during that month Mr. ¥onkosk¥ explained tt can take State Revenues fro~ three (3) ~s, to am much as ~wo (2} months to be processed and sent back Collle~ Co~ty. ~r. Yo~osky explained that the reason there seems to be a large ~o~t of cash in the Local Operattn~ Account ~s because there was a l~m ~nt of transfers and debt service payments that were made the ~lxt day. ~1~1~r Vol~ ~, seconded ~ Coutm~lon~ ~tthmm ~1~ 4/0 (~tss~o~ ~o=rts out), to accept the ;:O~~ OF & ~L~ DRILL C~ FACILI~ ~D ~ ~UIT O]r STATE Sheriff Don Hunter stated that his intent is to gain some measure ;.:il/of cou~tment from the Board in an effort to demonstrate to the State Florida }{RS that Collier County is serious about delivering some ;i~.!' ~nd deterrent to youthful offenders in Collier County, and done that, to acquire capital funding from the State of Florida ~d contract with them to acquJre/construct a boot camp which will house approximately 30 youthful offenders per session for a 120 day . ~e re~ested approval from the Board of County Commiss~oners '~t~l~ze the existing Immokalee 3ail Center property which constt- approximately 23 acre,~ and has been Judged to be adequate for ~lacement of a Juvenile Boot Camp Facility. He cited that the pro- ~Fty ~s appropriately zoned to accommodate a Boot Camp. SheF~ff Hunter reported that there t~ no firm construction comple- date ~cause none of the engineering or design work ~s completed. ~nd~cated that it Js moF,~ ~mpo~tant to get the Board's f~rm commit- ~ment, eup~rt~ng the concept, before the expen~ive process of Dermits ~ drawing is be~n. lff Hunter noted that the proposal is for approximately $1.9 Page 6 March 1, 1994 .on and includes all the costs that Staff could Identify as tt&ched to a Boot Camp Program in Collier County. He disclosed that ~roximately $800,000 will be sought from the State of Florida to ~provide for the acquisition and construction of the facility. He ~de¢l&red that in an effort to convince the State that Collier County be considered before other counties in acquiring the Capital ~mprovement Funds, a significant commitment from Collier County is req~/lred in the form of a match in funds for the contract. He recom- :mended that the Board approve the use of the Immokalee Jail Center for the Boot Camp, if it is properly zoned, or accomplish a if necessary, in order to use the property; commit the pro- for the purpose of a Boot Camp; and commit approximately !$4S9,000 for a local match for operating expenses and costs, which convince the State of Florida that Collier County has a signift- local commitment to go forward with the Boot Camp. Sheriff Hunter disclosed that acquiring information on youthful offenders is a problem. He declared that under F.S. Chapter(s) 39, i'~12, the State has created a situation where information on youthful offenders is not shared and is treated as secret. He reported that he was surprised to discover that this information is not shared with law iforcement agencies, schools or HRS. He stated that hopefully, the ~.State of Florida will correct that situation by creating an automated, uniform and comprehensive youthful offender criminal history retrieval 'stem. ',!Sheriff Hunter recalled that a group of 27 known youthful offen- .ders were evaluated two (2) years ago and in that group the average . of first arrests was 12 years of age. He ~tated that the 27 ?. 'en each averaged 22 arrests over the three (3) year period, and .they were arrested 4.8 times before they appeared in court for the ~irst time. He indicated that they were arrested 1~ times before they re committed to a program under HRS and the average length of com- tO a program was about six months, when a program bed was lable. He explained that of the 27 children, there was a cumula- Page 7 March 1, 1994 .vm.&rrest Of 595 times for that three (3) year period. He disclosed that s~ncs the capture rate on youthful offenders ts 10%, there was 6,000 crimes committed by the youthful offenders over that three (3) year period. He further stated that in 1992 there were i'~1',~06 ~uvenlle arrests locally, and in 1993 there were 1,597 arrests, ~h~ch is an increase of approximately /'i[ Sheriff Hunter declared that punishment of the proposed boot camp -~wlll result in the loss of freedom and this is the first con- ion, however, after that education, treatment and after-care valuable additional compcnents of the boot camp. He further that there will be education designed to provide the Graduate y Diploma, (GED) or a Vocational Technical Degree; treatment iiwill be provided under an existing private contract for Psychological Counselin~, and Drug Dependency Treatment. if necessary; and there be after-care required under State Statute delivered in coopera- iti0n with HRS and a private group contracting with HRS. He reported [that the preliminary commitment for education has been obtained from ;Mr. Munz, Superintendent of Schools Sheriff Hunter commented that if approval i:~ granted, the boot will be implemented in October, 1994. Sheriff Hunter declared that the Department of Corrections currently has a recidtvism rate of approximately 51%. He revealed ~hat this rate is flawed because it does not take into account the ~n.%lmber of arrests, noting that it only counts those offenders who are re-arrested, re-prosecuted, and re-convicted. .'~ Sheriff Hunter revealed that there are only 1,520 State commitment beds ~n existence for serious; habitual offenders for the entire State 'of Florida, therefore, there are no options for the commitment of 'outhful offenders, no matte]f how serious the offense is. ~':'" Responding to Commissioner Volpe, Sheriff Hunter stated that the State commitment beds are a part of the HRS Youthful Offender System, which separate from the Department of Corrections, however, it i,~ part of prison environment. Page 8 March 1, 1994 Sheriff Hunter stated that recently information was released a study of boo~ camps, pertaining to rectdtvlsm rates and whether boot camps are considered a viable option for the treatment rehabilitation of offenders. He cited a recent article in Magazine tndtcal:tng that boot camps are not as promising as hoped in preventing rectdivtsm than any other type of ~rogram. He reported that Staff contacted Dr. McKenzie, the author of article, and revealed. that she was grossly misquoted in the :tcle. Dr. McKenzie disclosed that the studles to date were done on boot camps and that the selection criteria is not as rigid as used for youthful offender boot camps and the treatment, educa- '.ti'on, counseling and after care components are not present in the adult camps. Ms. McKenzie suggested that if Collier County is to model a youth- ~ful offender boot camp after the Manatee County Boot Camp, with educa- treatment, counseling, and after-care components, there will be i"a more successful outcome in terms of rectdtvtsm and changing attitu- ~:des of the youthful offenders. In addition, she stated that youthful are more subject to change, as opposed to the adult offen- that have been studied. Sheriff Hunter encour~ged the Board to become more familiar with Manatee County Progran~, noting that it appears to be successful, jwell run, and seems to have a successful outcome with regard to ~ the attitude of the youthful offenders. He further stated currently Collier County and the surrounding areas do not have a ~factltty for commitment of: youthful offenders. Responding to Commissioner Constantine, Sheriff Hunter explained ;hat by State Statute only 30 youthful offenders are housed at one time in the same facility, therefore, there iS automatically a limtta- regarding regtonaliz~ng the boot camp. He remarked that there re some positive benefits to be derived from the County maintaining t~ OWn boot camp. He disclosed that when the boot camp Is located in Oounty of origin for the youthful offender, there are visitation Page 9 March 1, 1994 for family members, which afford a re-Integration of the 'mmtly, as well as family participation In the counseling and treat- programs. He reported that the re-insertion back Into soctety ]:~comee easier when the family ts Involved tn the entire process. }i:' In summary, Sheriff Hunter revealed that he has studied this Issue for approximately two (2) years and Is convinced that a boot camp with treatment and counseling as part of a large continuum of ~ssrvices, including the pro~[rams that precede the boot camp experience, will produce socially acceptable behavior. Sheriff HIAnter assured the public arid the Board of County Commissioners that ithe Intent tm not to condition or re-program youth tn the negative sense, but rather to achieve acceptable social behavior from the ~uth, and re-Integration back into society. ~ .~,:' Sheriff ~unter reported that currently there are approximately 120 .{. ~en that are candidate~, for boot camp In Collier County, which Justifies the need for this type of facility. He asked for the ~'k)Ard ' s support. Commissioner Matthews al~ked Sheriff Hunter ho~ it will be deter- ~sd which of the 30 of the 120 young people will have acces:s to the camp out, and in what order? Sheriff Hunter replied that It is established by Florida State that the Camp Commander, HRS Staff and an Oversight Board will dmts~mine who will be placed in the boot camp, based upon their crtmt- history, psychological profiles, personality, ability to fit Into the boot camp environment and their potential for success. i'' In response to Commissioner Matthews, Sheriff Hunter explained ~th&t currently the Statute reads that boot camp candidates are life, )ltal, first degree felony and second degree felony youthful offen- or youthful offenders who have committed a third degree felony and have been adjudicated on at least three (3} prior felony counts. treed that it is the Juvenile Court Judge who has the authority to ~O~'tt youthful offenders, between the ages of 14 and 18, to a boot for a period of months. Pa,ae 10 March 1, lgg4 Xn rempon.e to Com~Issionsr Volpe's Inquiry, Sheriff Hunter ! that life and capital crimea include murder, rap,t and armed although the youthful offenders do not receive those kinds of ?! Sheriff Hunter agreed with Commissioner Vo]pe that less than 10~ the total arrestess wall be eligible for the Boot Camp Program. He further mtated that It Is his personal preference not to place offen- ~erm that have been convicted of murder, multiple rapes and '~U tiple armed robberies in a boot camp. He pointed out ths. t the chance of having a successful outcome Is minimal and a waste of expen- sive resources. He stated that those types of candidates are more appropriate for an adult prison environment, or some other type of ~amp much as The Last Chance Ranch, where ~natead of prison, offenders ~Aven the opportunity to go to a Shock Incarceration Program vo'l~tartly. ;~'~ Co~lssloner Constantine questioned Sheriff Hunter regardtn9 a Co~ttaent fro~ the School Board for the proposed budget of $1~,000 ~for ~ducatlon. Sheriff Hunter reported that the Statute provides that the boot ca~p must be coordinated ~lth the School Board and they shall [~provlde for the educational component. He disclosed that the 8175,000 [co~tt~ent is for tl~e and ~atertal, ~htch tacludes computers and In response to Commissioner Constantine, Sheriff Hunter stated !lhat roughly one hour and 45 minutes Is scheduled for Introduction to Computers. He revealed theft building self-esteem and self-image Is ~!mportant to the conversion of youthful offenders getting back Into the ~atnmtream of society. He further stated that the Intent is to self-esteem and emil--Image through physical training, the abl- to master an obstacle course, and the ability to master a dtf- 'Itcult device like a computer. 4~ Commissioner Volpe rec~lled a conversation with Sheriff Hunter 'e~ardin9 the application deadline for the grant monies available 'h the State of Florida. March 1, 1994 In response, Sheriff Hunter clarified that Mike Boland HRS le Justice Manager, informed him that it appears there will be Some lapse money at the State level that had originally been 'rammed for boot camps to counties that were not prepared to go 'forward. He stated if the County makes a commitment on or about March ;(1, 1994, which coincides %{i~h the Board of County Commissioners ~[meeting date, Collier County will be in a favorable position to .~ monies from the SZate of Florida for the construction of the camp. Responding to Commissioner Constantine, Sheriff Hunter advised the State is looking for the commitment, not the actual ~riation or expenditure of the dollar. He requested a commitment :~rom the Board that can be attached to the document stating that the Board of County Commissioners resolve to commit County funds to assist the development of the boot camp in order to obtain a commitment k :~from the State ox Florida that will allow Collier County to proceed :w~th the recruitment and training activities for the facility. i)i - Mr. Boland stated that Collier County is ~n a competitive ~ltuat~on with other communities around the State. He reported that appears that in early March there will be a re-distribution of that were allocated to other communitie..] that will be unable to ~end same due to problems with zoning and other issues. He related Collier County will have to compete with other communities in to be in line for thos~e funds. Mr. Boland pointed out that the r, the House, and the Senate are looking at $153 million in new money this year. He declared that Juvenile Justice is a big ticket th~s year, however, it may not be in future years. i .. 'Co~missioner Volpe inquired whether the 17 new deputies allocated ~he budget will be dispatlched to a boot canp, representing 10% of youthful offenders, or to crime prevention, control of the ~st~eets and enforcement of the existing laws? '.~.' Sheriff ~unter advised that the money would be spent wisely by rating thos~ youthful offenders who ha~e already been adjudi- 119 Page 12 March 1, 1994 :&ts~ five (~) or six (6} times for crimes and probably have committed more crimes that ar~ yet undiscovered. ~!i'' Responding to Commts13toner Volpe, Sheriff Hunter replte. d that the boot camp will be a new facility constructed beside the existing mmokalee Jail Center, which currently houses adult offenders from the 'Immokalee area. Commissioner Saunders3 revealed that he had several major concerns ~that have been satisfactorily addressed. He agreed that the first emphasis of the facility should be on punishment, and that treatment, :ion and after-care are critical and distinguishing components '~:between this type of facility and those reported In the media. ~om~lissioner Saunders stated that he is in support of the concept and 11 indicate to HRS thai: he supports not only providing the land for facility, but also favors providing the local match in funds for project. He requested that the Shertff's Office and the Juvenile ice Counsel keep the Board informed regarding publicity and any issues that are raised by people in communities where these drill camps are located. He indicated that Collier County could learn from the mistakes made by other communities. Commissioner Saunders asked what the costs are associated with where will the funds will come from, and what the after- component consist of 7 .:!~ Mr. Boland replied that those funds will be provided by HRS. He stated that the after-care component will consist of intensive super- in the community. He Indicated that the children will be in an Intensive Day Treatment five (5) to seven (7) days a iweek from 8:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. Mr. Boland said the children will In their own homes at night. He stated that after the Intensive .~ay Treatment component, an after-care program will follow the kids in ~mall case loads of 8-10 youths, to assure they are transttioned back the community. · Commissioner Saunders a~reed with Commissioner Volpe that pre- tng crime is the number one quality of life Issue, and noted if Page 13 March 1, 1994 ~ie do not feel safe in their homes, on the ~;treets, and on the ~t does not matter what the community is like, the quality of Sheriff Hunter's expertise and recommendation regarding the drill 'camp. Oommissioner Saunders asked if the Judges are supportive of issue and if they see it as a necessary st~p in curbing juvenile crime, to which Sheriff Hunter replied in the affirmative, citing ~trative Judge Blackwe]l's endorsement. Oo~u~lssioner Norris stated that all of his questions have been .reseed regarding the is,~ue. He declared that the boot camp i~x~erience w~11 change the outlook on life and the perspective of one fits into the grand scheme of thlng~, ]n an extreme hurry. !which ~s a benefit of the program. He further stated that the func- ol after-care is critical to the program. He reported that he is favor of the concept, and understands that conceptual commitment is that is needed, and the Board will have the opportunity in the ~f~ture to discuss the budgetary ~tems. '~' Commissioner Norris stated that because the program is limited present rules and regulations to 30 occupants at any one time, cannot be a continually expanding program. He asked if there is ~ndication that the maximum number of occupants might be changed some point in the future? ~'Mr. Boland revealed that the County is presently under Federal ~r~ Order and that residential commitment facllit~es are limited to ~0 occupants. ~e reported that Lee County is trying to build ~altx'ucture, food 8ervico, laundry, off~ce, and admin~s~rat~ve departments ~ha~ w~]] serve satellite p~ograms tha~ house 30 :erl. Mr. Bo]and stated that It ~s his ~ntent to have one ~uc~ure ~o service ,~ul~ple programs. He suggested that th~s .Fo~r~ could be designed to have components added ~n the future. Colm~le~oner Saunders inquired regarding ~he Lee County pro,ram. MF. Boland replied tha% there ~s a 30 bed halfway house program: Page 14 March 1. 1994 ~on-resldenttal Intensive day treatment program operating from 8 to 8 P.M., and is a etep-down program for the 30 bed Regimented Nlldernese Program (Boot Camp) in Lee County. He stated that the nlrastructure will serve all of those programs, P.~e~d: 10:40 A.M. - Reconvened: 10:50 A.M. at which time ~ordl,~g ~retary Karbirmttl replaced Recording $ecretmry Nerz *** The following people spoke on this item.' Mike Boland Aubrey Rogers Jane Varner Bill Neron Kathleen C. Passldomo George Keller l;al Gardino Frances C. Barsh Sheriff Hunter stated that: Manares County has reported a 98% suc- rate in terRm of rearrests. He said that the current rearre:st ate for the State of Florida is 50% and the Federal rate is Sheriff Hunter revealed that the number one priority ts punish- lent', sanction and deterrents. but not coddling. Sheriff Hunter Indicated that the actual, annual cost to Collier tm approximately $9,400.00 per bed. He stated that this cost be derrayed by the reimbursement by HRS at $56.00 per day per Co~leeloner Constantine stated that he agrees that the Justice ~ust "get back to bastc~", but the proposed schedule has these doing something from 5 a.~s. to 9 p.m. He agreed that the prison Is broken. He said tha~ this program will be an important com- in correcting the systems. ~,. . Co~uateeloner Constantine r~marked that he Is ready to grant con- ~eptual approval today, but cannot approve any specific budget, noting that he received the proposed budget on February 29, 1994. ~[., ~.ll~gr~l~ stockade, the enc."Glbranca of 8308,000.00 and to .'&uth~rlz~ th~ Sheriff as de:~i~ee to ~rsue State, f~ding. i~.:. Co~lssloner Saunders s~ata~d that he cannot support the motion ~ue it will not get the Job done. He said that he agrees ~ith the ,er~s lction Groupie augga. stion to be frugal, however, the County Page 15 March l, 1994 not have a solution to Juvenile crime that does not cost 'thing. Co~tmtssioner Saunders requested that Commissioner Volpe rez~cind motion and replace it with a motion that provides the funding to the. Job done. Commissioner Volpe stated that he will not rescind his motion in that regard. He said that the BCC is building a budget and will have ~the opportunity to see what i,3 required. Oo~mAuloner ¢onatantine ,meconded the motion on the floor. ' In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Boland replied that the is a giant step in the right direction to obtain a commitment From HRS. Commissioner Saunders asked where the $308,000.00 came from? Commissioner Volpe stated that the $308,000.00 is reflected on the financial statement that was presented to the Board which indicates that the Sheriff transferred this amount back to the Board of County ',Commissionere. Sheriff Hunter stated that he returned $400°000.00. Oommieetoner Volpe said J.f the amount should be $400,000.00, he All amend the motion to ~nc].ude that figure. In response to Commissioner Constantine, County Manager Dorrill ~eplted that the Sheriff ]s restricted from spending funds on the last ,day of the fiscal year. He explained that the $308,000.00 is the nor- 'mml turnback to the Board. }[e said that the $400,000.00 was deposited ?into the General Fund Reserves. Commissioner Saunders st~ted that the $308,000.00 is an arbitrary fi~re that bears no relationship to the program. He reiterated that 'motion should be made that will get the Job done. i'" Sheriff Hunter said that the actual amount requested is $489,000.00. He suggested that he come back before the Board of ~.~:Count¥ Commissioners with a l~equest for an appropriation from the ;~Confiecation Trust Fund for $90,000.00 if the $400,000.00 that has been provided could be set aside. Page 16 March 1, 1994 ,'.. ; Commissioner Saunder,3 remarked that the Board must approve a [on for $489,000.00. He Indicated that the amount is subject to !change based on the budgets being refined. '~i.} Commissioner Volpe e~p]atned that the intent of the motion is to .grant the request for the commitment of $400,000.00 which Is the that the Sheriff has already returned. He stated if he )rated the financial report incorrectly, he will amend ~he motion whatever the correct amount Is. Commissioner Constantln,~ agreed with Commts:sioner Volpa. ~ ' Commissioner Constantine said that the motion will provide the i. State with a commitment for the program. Commissioner Volpe conf:[rmed that the actual amount of the commit- ment will coincide with the money that the Sheriff has turned back to Board of County Commissioners. 'OpOll call for the qxleetJ. on, the motion carried 3/2 (Coulsstoner ~rs ~d ~tth~ oppo~e,d). Co~tssioner Saunders ~tated that he voted against the motion /~,~Stmply because he does not feel the amount is sufflctent. C~tsstonsr Sanders ~toved to approve the amo~t of $400,000.00 'm t~ ~ttng ~t~o~ In order to indicate to ~5 th~t the ~ of $~ty Co~tsslonsrs is ~tfted in this regard. Seconded by ats~tsr ~tth~s. ~ till for Co~ty Manager Dotrill asked if the $613,000.O0 proposed for the trst year operating costs i.s included In the Appropriations Bill that being considered by the Legislature? Mr. Boland replied that the monies are not specifically earmarked fo~ Collier County at this time. He said if the State does not pro- f%lndtng, the County will be forced to rescind its commitment. Manager Dorrill staked what form of agreement will be pro- tded between the County and MRS? Boland answered that a contract will be developed. Manager Dotrill recalled that the Board previously approved Page 17 March !, ~4 iruction pro~ect with operating costs as part of the ~iscal OF COLLIER C07I[~TY OOV~R~NT PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE '~ - ~D; WO~SHOP S~ED~ED FOR ~RIL 20, ~994 ~OM 9:00 ~' Mary Weigold, Chairper,Don of the Productivity Committee, stated that 1993 provided a new and different approach to the Productivity She said that the assignments designated by the BCC pro- vlded more County wide fssue..~ and topics. She presented the Board "~th a number of sub, acts &nd revealed that they will be discussed in th at the Workshop Meeting. Ms. Weigold revealed that the basis of the Emergency Medical 8erv~ces (EMS) Report is based on how that department provides a vital ~rvlce to the County. She said that the Report recommends g~/idelines the utilization of the EMS helicopter. funding considerations; ~providing representation from the City and the County in order ~aolve disputes; and the formulation of a Speaker's Bureau. !. Ms. Weigold s~ated that the second Report is in regard to the of tho new helicopter. She explained that the Committee's ~recouendation is that the Board declare its intention to support the ; select an Oversight Committee; develop guidelines for operation and maintenance; and pursue additional used ~'he~coptere of the same make and mode] once the decision is made. Ms. Weigold reported that the third Report i,.~ in regard to ~d/Unpa~d Leaves of Absence. Ms. Weigold indicated that the fourth topic addresses Community Development Services. She stated that due to the recent changes. the CO~ttee has not had the opportunity to discuss the recommendations ['th Mr. Clark and At would be more appropriate to discuss them at the workshop. Welgold etated that 'the f~fth Report is on the 800 MHz System. Page 18 March 1, 1994 reminded the Board that the time frame Is drawing close to :olplete the necessary action to secure the non-cancellation of the F¢C licenses, Me. Welgold requested that a date and time be set for the Workshop. Co~lssloner Constantine suggested that the workshop meeting be for mid-April. i: Ms. Welgold Introduced the new Chairperson, Mr. Tim Hanco,:k, to the Board of County Commissioners. It was the consensus of the Board that the Workshop Meeting with Collier County Productivity Committee be scheduled for April 20, 1994 from 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. ~,T~ ~0~ C~O[O~,03KZZ ISL~3D - IT~X TO Bg ADDED TO ~CC AOX]n:~ ~IT~IN · Attorney Bruce Anderson reported that he is representing the ii~malllwood family members, who own property on Choko]oskee Es]and that ~wmm originally platted for $mallwood's Subdtvls.[on tn the 1920's. He ~"esented & survey showing the lot lines of his clients' property was recorded in 1987 as part of a probate proceeding. He said three months ago when his clients had a contract for the sale of one of their lots, they were notified that their lots were Illegal ~d that no building permits would be Issued until the County's ion pla~lng retirements had been complied with. He said ~.::' S~11~od's found that If their homes are destroyed by a natural , they would no~ be able to rebuild. ~. Anderson stated that there Is a two fold problem; nonconfo~- t~ wlth Iln~lul 1Or size and nonconformity with subdivision re~la- ~e ~e~es~ed that the Board grandfather In o~ exempt g t~ parcels on Chokoloskee f~om these two regulations. He that In 1~90, the County exempted Choko]oskee from th,~ Zoning Itlon Ordinance. I~ ~el~nee to Co~lsslone~ Matthews, Mr. Anderson confirmed that Page 19 March !, 1994 %J~ Oount¥ had been issuing building permits in this area as recently February. 1993, Co~umissioner Volpe pointed out that this item has been brought up a result of a title search. the regular agenda. He suggested that the item be placed Commissioner Volpe stated that if there is a mechanism to )lish Mr. Anderson's objective, he must provide how and who is iponeible to maintain the private easements that provide access to heee individual residences. It was the consensus of the Board that Staff place this item on agenda within 30 days. O~J)INAB~ TO ALLOW ADDIYIONAL IMPACT FEE DlFERRAL ALTll~NATIVES - STAFF DI~--f~D TO ADVerTISE PUBLIC HEARING ~. - Greg Mihalic, Affordable Housing Director, stated that the County !~iAttorney advised that it is possible to bring this item back under provisions at a night hearing without advertising, if it is i.'~ithe desire of The Board of County Commissioners. ,~'~ In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Mlhalic replied that this be a permanent amendment to the Ordinance. ..In answer to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Mth.alic explained that the are requesting th.[s amendment in order to allow a separate for deferrals from what is available now. Co~mmieeioner Volpe mov.ed, seconded by Commissioner Morris, that .i:~ta£f be directed to adverti~e for a public hearing. .O~x~m call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. Stephen Thompson requested that the Board consider this under the i~E]ler~]ency Ordinance provisions because his client must have his low £ncome housing tax credit application in by April 4, 1994. In response to Commissioner Saunders, County Attorney Cuyler ,lied that if an Emergency Ordinance amendment is adopted to permit Mr. Thompeon's request, the night hearing requirement could be eltmt- ooK OCO .,. 27 Page 20 March 10 1994 however, the elimination would be permanent. Commissioner Constantine announced that he is not comfortable with "amending the Ordinance permanently in this case. S120) X~em #SB1 ~R~POItT AND ]~CO~[KNDATION ON SHORT AND LONG TERM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ;NIT~ T!~ COUNTT BARN ROAD CORRIDOR - APPROVED STAFF RE00MMENDATIONS AS Transportation Services Administrator Archibald stated that this i~tsm Includes two elementfJ. He said that the first addresses gaining approval on changing out culvert pipes on County Barn Road for total cost of $17,000.00. He requested that Staff be authorized process budget amendments to undertake certain drainage replacement 'actlone on the east side of County Barn Road. Mr. Archibald reported that the second element deals with the Barn Road corridor Including the drainage outfall into the ~dselgn phase and subsequently Into the right-of-way and the construc- .tton phase which will cost approximately $1 m.lllion. He said that aff has outlined five options for funding. Referring to the design phase of the 4-1anlng of County Barn Road, · Archibald requested diJ,ectton on continuing the inclusion of the phase of the water management improvements with the roadway and .whether Staff should proceed with any additional step. In response to Commissioner Volpe, County Attorney Cuyler stated that there is no problem directing Staff to pursue options. h: The following people spoke on the subject: George Keller Skip Riffle i~i,. Douglas McGllvra Glenn Simpson Shirley Riley Commissioner Norris stated that he understood that the canal work be part of the 4-1aning of County Barn Road. He remarked that g to the Executive Summary it is not part of the 4-1anlng. He if this is a recent change? .~,Transportatton Servlces~ Administrator Archibald replied that the directed Staff to take advantage of the design to incorporate Page 21 March 2, 1994 road and water management design into the plans and specifica- ~ons. He stated that it ]s improper and illegal to use road funds !~!~or a water management purpose not related to the roadway. He pointed out that the road project and water management project are two dif- ~farent projects that should be addressed separately. :' Commissioner Norris moved to approve Staff recommendation am pre- '~ieented An the Executive $u~ry, seconded by Co~missionsr Saunders. Commissioner Volpe stated that he cannot support the mot]on ']because this is a basin issue. He clarified that the motion is appro- ival of pursuing funding within basin 6 under the stormwater drainage ~l&n. He explained that unifo~'mity is important as to how the storm- water runoff problem is handled. ~ call for the question, the motion csrrted 4/1 (Coutss~oner ~2 :RE$OLUTI0~ 94-135 1%E LE&SE AGREEM]~NT B~TWE~N BCC *D~~ OF HI~Y S~ ,~ MOTOR ~HICLES - A~D; ~~ ~~ TO LEG~ R~I~ :'* Commissioner Constantine ,~uggested that this item be discussed with Item #8B3, Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained that ,;this item involves a lease at the Immokalee A~rport to continue to ::..operate a driver license bureau. ~: Gomm~ssioner Volpe asked if there are any termination provisions h~ha leases? ~ /Commissioner Volpe expressed concern regard:[ng fair market w~lue. asked if an assessment was done7 Mr. Archibald answered affirmatively and explained that in the ¢mae of the Immokalee Airport the Federal Aviation Authority the County to reduce th,~ appraised value if there is a purpose. He said that 'the Everglades City Airport is a small site which does reflect the market appraisal. Mr. Archibald revealed that there are termination clauses in both Page 22 March !, 1994 '¢Our~ty Attorney Cuyler a!;/reed to review both agreements to verify they contain terminatiol~ clauses. Coma/~lon~r Vo:lp~ ~, seconded by Co~lsaloner Norris to ~l ~ leto ~r~nt I~t~en the ~ard of C~ty ~ Flort~ ~t~nt of ~tgh~y Safet~ ~d ~tor Vehicle, e, to ~ ~i~ ~d t~t Reaoiution 94-135 ~ adopted. ~ call for t~ ~sttc,n, the ~tlon carried Page 23 ~arch ~, 1994 :LEASK A~EMENT BETWEEN MJC MANAGEMENT, INC. AND COLLIER COUNTY FOR ~.i'THE PIIRPOSE OF UTILIZING A PORTION OF THE EVERGLADES CITY AIRPORT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUGTING A BICYCLE RENTAL BUSINESS - APPROVED SUBJECT TO L~OAL REVIEW This item was discussed in conjunction with Item #8B2, above. Commission Volps moved, seconded by Commissioner Norris to approve the lemae agreement between MJC Management, Inc. and Collier County, ~ubJect to legal review. Upon cm11 for the question, the motion carried unanimoumly. <.~ . Page 24 March 1, 1994 ess ~t~CUS: 12:30 i~ - ~:econvened: 1:09 1~ Xt this time Recording · ecretar~ Fix-ally replaced Recording $ecreta:~ ~rbiretti Xt~D1 " [l ll~l~r&XXO~ FLA~ FOR UTILITIES DIVISION PERFORMANCE R,~"VI~H REPORT · R~gDA?TO~ - AFFROVED Mike MeNess, Acting Utilities Administrator, stated that contrary to reports and rumors of the eminent collapse of the Utilities Division, it is doing well and today he is addressing the most serious problem of image and public: perception, Mr. McNees explained that the Performance Review Report submitted by Coopers & Lybrand (C&L) revolves around MIS issues and how the Utilities Division can improve operation through greater use of auto- marion. Mr. McNees explained that Staff is presenting a plan which adopts the C&L proposal (i.e., hiring a consultant to addreset the MIS Issue overall) and a listing of specific recommendations addx'esslng billing and customer service which have already been or are currently being implemented, as pres~nted on Pages 5 and 6 of the Executive Summary. Commissioner Constantine questioned how the County is measuring error percentages in calculating impact fees which the report reads "Error percentages have gone down and customer satisfaction has Increased." Mr. McNees explained that error percentages are measured by Staff and the customers are being questioned directly regarding satisfac- tion, but more detailed information will be secured and presented to the Board. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Utilities Finance Director Ron Cook explained that the $20,000 discrepancy arising from the con- version between the HPE and the NCC software systems was resolved in July or August, 1993 prior to sending deposit refunds and Staff was in the process of reconciling the discrepancy when C&L performed the per- formance review. Mr. McNees recommended a schedule from March 1 through September Page 25 March 1, 1994 1, 1994, for the development of a scope of services and selection pro- cess for a data processing consultant whose purpose is to look at the overall need for automation including the core business processes, i.e., purchasing, inventory control, work orders, in addition to tra- ditional customer billtng/~ervlce. Mr. McNees pointed out that the consultant will determine t~hether the system the Utilities Division currently operates is capable of meeting Its long term need~3 or if a new system, in terms of haFdware and software, is necessary. Mr. McNees explained that little guidance should be given to the con- sultant so that there are no preconceived notions involved and recom- mendations are totally open and unbiased. Mr. McNees stated that recommendations are scheduled to be brought to the Board before the end of September which is not sufficient time for Staff to Incorporate all recommendations into the FY 94/95 budget 'but does allow Staff to deal with immediate need recommendations early in the fiscal year. Mr. McNees pointed out that the budget cycle, as it affects the Utilities Division, is not as critical as the ad valorem funds. ~4-..: . Commissioner Constantine stated that he prefers having an unbiased short llst presented to the Board of County Commissioners for the selectlon of a consultant and also to hear the presentations by the fir,s, rather than Just rece!vtng a recommendation. Commissioner Saunders stated that the short ltst should include 'the ranking by the selection committee. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. McNees stated that information will be available on privatizing the billing function at the same time the short list/presentations for the consultant are pre- sented to the Board. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. McNees stated that Staff recommends paralleling the automation and prtvattzatton rather than one (1) consultant making recommendations on both. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. McNees explained that it is possible that very little need be spent to extend the Utilities Page 26 March 1, 1994 Dtvision's present syste~ to suit the County's needs. Mr. McNees stated that it is difficult to recommend a plan to trim employees or staff a system before it is decided what the system will be. Mr. McNees explained that during the budget process and through the course of the consultant's work, recommendations will be made to economize wherever possible as a result of the automation undertaken. Commissioner Constantine stated that contract completion is scheduled for June 1, with the consultant's report completed on September 1, and the presentation to the Board of County Commissioners on September 20, 1994. Commissioner Constantine asked that the September 1 and September 20 time frames be accelerated by two (2) weeks to allow the Board an opportunity at the end of the budget cycle to look at necessary and/or unnecessary positions. tommiss.loner Constantine pointed out that governments are famous for implementing plans for potential savln.qs and not moving forward. He suggested that the Board take full advantage of whatever savings are recommended in the report. Mr. McNees stated that if it is discovered during discussions with the consultants that the three (3) month time frame schedule (from June 1, contract award to consultant, to September 20, 1994, presen- tation of consultant report) is too short or too long, the Board of County Commissioners will be notified immediately. Mr. McNees pointed out that the C&L report states that cost savings may not result from a diminished staff but the ablltty to con- tinue to deal with growth with the existing staff. Mr. McNees stated that under Plant and System Operations and Maintenance, C&L recommends Initiating an employee compensation eva- "luatton which the Board of County Commissioners has already approved i.,. as part of the adopted FY 1995 budget policy, .not only in the Utilities Division but County wide. Mr. McNees explained that another large area of recommendatlon in the CaL report is levels of staffing at County facilities. Ne explained that C&L has mad~~- recommendations for each of the water Page 27 March 1, 1994 plants, wastewater plant~ and some maintenance sections which Staff does not fully agree with and lacks understanding of: therefore, Staff has asked C&L to tdentlf%, what facilities were utilized to create the formulas used to generate the staffing recommendations and where those facilities are being staffed into those formulas. Mr. McNees stated that Staff would like to know where these staff recommendations are working and what the methodology is before making changes. Mr. McNees stated that ~he Board of County Commissioners approved a South Sewer Plant Master Plan, which if not complete t~ nearly complete, and includes a staffing analysis of the largest wastewater facility that indicates the plants are staffed appropriately. He explained that customers have an investment in excess of $300,000,000 in the water and sewer system and it would be lrrespoosible for Collier County to lay off plant operators until the differences bet- ween the consulting engineers report, Staff's expert experience in operating the facilities and the methodology utilized by C&L is reconciled. Mr. McNees stated that Staff is open to economies of scale, gains from automat]on and finding optimum staffing levels but they have not been presented and/or documented appropriately. Commiss~oner Constantine asked that Mr. McNees scrutinize optimum staffing levels thoroughly in the Utilities Division and assure that all pos~tions are fully documented as to necessity during the budget process th~s year because of the nine (9) requested positions last year that the Board was told were not needed. Mr. McNees stated that C&L recommends that an engineering depart- ~ent be created but one is in existence: its scope needs to be broaden and will be addressed during the budget process. Mr. McNeee stated that ~he Q+ process was acknowledged and continue to pursue related studies and internal efforts to improve ~he COllier County processes. Co~]ss~oner Matthews stated that it is recommended that an ~nvest~gation be conducted relative to changin~l the 24 hour ~,hifts from six {~) positions to fl%,e (5) positions and ~nquired whether this Page 28 March 1 1994 t8 b~lng addressed. Mr. McNees responded that Staff has requ,.sted background Infor- mation for the basis of that recommendation from C&L but this has not ~:,~en supplied. Mr. McNee:! assured the Board that before recommending staffing that the Issue will be reconciled but Staff believes Collier County Is staffed adequat4~ly and supports the six (6) positions. In response to Commts~Jloner Matthews Mr. McNees stated that the reduction recommendation In the 24 hour positions is included in the 16 Dosittons recommended for elimination. Mr. McNees explained that the ~ositions C&L Is reco.~iendlng to be added will not be ad,~ressed until staffing questions are reconciled and until the overall picture ~s seen of what will be saved by automation, or until the methodology utilized Is clarified. Coalsstoner Matthews stated that only three (3} people are required to manage a 24 hour shift and C&L Is recommending five (5) ~ositJons to allow fo~ vacations, holiday, sick leave and personal leave yet Staff feels that s~x (6) positions are necessary. Co~ty Manager Do~r/11 stated that the recommended reduction relates to plant operating personnel but someone must ]~ave the water plant ~d t~avel da~ly to complete the wel]f]eld and maintenance ~ns~ct~ons and the slxth person helps account for vacations, etc., notJn~ that the plants cannot be abandoned. Co~Jsstone= Matthews suggested that the Job descriptions may be m~elemdlng to make C&L believe that six (6) peoD]e are assigned to shift work and some rational reconciliation mu~t be accomplished. M=. McNees advised the Board that C~L returned Staff's telephone call one hour ago and explanations w~11 be for~hcom~n~ and documenta- tion secured. Co~JssJoner Norrls sugg;ested that Staff move forward with imple- mentation of the plan and any variation from the recommendations pre- mented ]n the re9ort should be fully Justified by Staff. Mr. Dotrill explained that at budget hearings staffing loads which vary from the recommendations by C&L will be addressed and rational Page 29 will be presented. March 1, 1994 Commissioner Norris stated that under a NASA satellite tracking contract, four (4) shifts ran equaling 160 hours per week and there are 168 hours in a week so eight (8) hours are overtime; five (5) people are ample to cover absenteeism, etc. Commissioner Matthews stated that she researched allocating per- sonnel to 24 hour shifts and allowing for vacations, holidays, etc. and derived that 3.7 people would be necessary to cover a 24 hour ~' shift, 365 days a year. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Wastewater Director Tim Clemons stated that Staff i~ not recommending that the County upgrade all operator positions to the senior operator level as proposed by 'C&L. Mr. Clemons explained that the State does not mandate that there be a Class "A" operator on every shift He explained that the cost savings to the County are substantial by utilizing Class "B" and "C" operators. Mr. Clemons pointed out that it takes five (5) years to obtain a Class "A" license which would take an extremely long time for all operators to obtain and would result in paying more for positions that are not needed. Co---tss~oner Norris moved, seconded by Co~st~sioner Saunders and carried unanimously, that Statff proceed wlth plan implementmtton, and that ~m unbiased short list for a software con:suitor be ~bmlt~ed for the ~d of Cu-~ Co~tlstoners' review ~d ~y deviations from the r~~tA~ of the reporl be fully Justified by Staff. :-.Xt~ t8G2 ~ ~ ~NITORIN~ PL~ FOR THE N~LES ~DFILL - ~PRO~D Bill Lorenz, Environmental Services Administrator, stated that at the September 15, 1993, workshop, the Board directed Staff to review and evaluate the County's ground water monitoring plan for the Naples Landfill. Mr. Lorenz explained that in order to provide a more comprehensive program to protect. the public's health and safety, Staff 000:,,',: 58 Page 30 Narch 1, 1994 is recommending adding five (5) additional sampling wells off site between the Landfill and residences, adding 30 shallow wells designed to gather data to determine the direction and velocity of ground water movement from the Landfill and expanding the list of parameters sampled to include more toxic and hazardous constituents than presently required which will be a regulation In October 1994 but is being recommended to begin now. Mr. Lorenz explained that the public suggested that monitoring should be monthly rather than quarterly but ground water flows approximately five to ten (5-10} feet per year in a northeasterly direction from the Landfill which is a relatively slow rate of move- ment indicates that semi-annual sampling is an appropriate sampling frequency. Mr. Lorenz stated that the current monitoring program Is improved by adding more wells and parameters and by better determining the direction and velocity of ground water movement. Mr. Lorenz pointed out that surface water quality monitoring will continue on a monthly basis and can also serve as an early warning detection system. Mr. Lorenz stated that the proposed program will have a first year cost of $43,200 and an annual cost of $28,200 compared to the annual cost of the current program of $20,400. Mr. Lorenz stated that funds currently budgeted are adequate to cover the proposed changes. In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Lorenz stated that this is an Enterprise Fund expendltu.~e. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Loren:,- explained that Staff is able to accomplish the proposed addition of the five (5) sampling wells off site between the Landfill and residences In the current fiscal year and the $50,000 budgeted will tmplem~:nt the enttr,_~ work program. Mr. Lorenz pointed out that the wells that are subJ,~ct to the closure will not be physically completed this fiscal year. Mr. Lorenz explained that the current budget amount will be suf- ficient for monitoring b,gcau~3e of the savings realized from changing from a quarterly to semi-annual Inspection program. Co~issionmr Norris moved, seconded by Co~u~ta~stoner Volpe and Page 31 March 1, 1994 ': c~rTted unani~ously, that Staff implement the recommended sonitoring ,. programs and process the .appropriate budgot amendments. · ./ten ~803 NATIIAAL R~SOURCES PROTECTION AREA (NRPA) PROGRAM - STAFF TO CONTINUE TO D~;I~OF N]~PA I~ROGRAM Ifil[ CLAM PASS FIRST AREA CO~SIDIR~D ILND RKSTORATIO~ TO BH INCLUDI~D ~,.. Bill Lorenz, Environnenl:al Services Administrator, stated that on January 18, 1994, the Board directed Staff to develop more specific ~u~deltnes for identifying and further development of the Natural Resource Protection Areas; (NRPA) program. Mr. Lorenz explained that the Growth Management Plan requires Collier County to identify NRPA's and to adopt development guidelines ~'- and standards. Mr. Lorenz pointed out that if the Board directs Staff to cease work on the NRPA program that amendments must be adopted to the Growth Management Plan. Mr. Lorenz stated that the two (2) main components are selection of criteria for identifying an area as a potential NRPA, ultimately providing Justification for ~he Board to adopt the area and the pro- cess to identify potential NRPA's and developing the management guidelines. Mr. Lorenz stated that the process for identifying potential ~{RPA's ~s first to obtain Board authorization to proceed which will ~i%" entail Staff preparing a three to five (3-5) page technical memorandum '. for each potential area, addressing the criteria to be used to solicit ~.{ direct/on from the Board. Mr. Lorenz explained that the Board will then decide on which, if any, of the NRPA's should proceed to the next Mr. Lorenz stated that the second step is the development of an ~ NRPA management plan, Justification/rational for the NRPA, and Staff will request that the Board either approve or reject the plan. Mr. Lorenz pointed out that the process also allows for sufficient feed- back through the Environmental Protection Technical Advisory Board Page 32 March 1, !994 (EPTAB) who will help identify and work through the Justification, develop and propose protect]on mechanisms (the management guidelines), and also solicit public input through a workshop format. Mr. Lorenz stated that when Staff prese. nts a potential NRPA to the Board, it will have gone through an extensive public input process. Mr. Lorenz stated that the criteria for consideration of Natural Resource Protection Areas include the water protection and conset- vatton area wherein Staff will be quantifying how much of the water shed area is draining into ~ome very critical estuarlne systems. He Indicated that the technical memorandum will Include this information and will be as quantitative as possible. Mr. Lorenz indicated that recharge aquifers will be identified and the Board will be provided the Information on how much of the proposed NRPA's are located within the critical recharge areas. Mr. Lorenz explained that other criteria for consideration of a NRPA is habitat for endangered, other ilsted species, and biod~ver- e~ty ~nd will be presented as a County computer overlay map for Board consideration along with Ju:~tification as to why the area is critical to Collier County. Mr. Lorenz explained that this Information is also critical for the w~ldlife corridor/movement for selected species. Mr. Lorenz stated that rare, unique and endangered habitats is another : criteria for consideration of a NRPA and will identify a number of vegetation signatures and habitats within the County. Mr, Lorenz stated that fisheries, such as sea grass beds, will also be considered and quantified for Board consideration Mr. Lorenz pointed out that Clam Bay is one of the highest areas for sea grass beds. Mr. Lorenz stated that pristine/natural state areas will be tden- ~.,.,' l:~f~ed very specifically to enable the Board to determine if It should be considered as a NRPA or not. Mr. Lorenz explained that a variety of protection mechanisms include set asides, density transfers, purchase of development rights, ~urchese of property use rights, land use density/zoning, conservation Page 33 March 1, 1994 '?':.eaaements, requlatory standards, mitigation banking, land development :~:~ standards and public ownership and will be utilized to evaluate each NRPA. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Lorenz replied that removing the NRPA program from the Growth Management Plan will not prohibit Collier County from setting aside areas for protection voluntarily. Commissioner Constantine stated that it would relieve the County !'~" from an absolute obligation or from a Department of Community Affairs ~i' :". requirement. The following persons :spoke on this item. Bernie Young Bill Neron Ellte Krter Dr. Fran Stallings Barbara Cawley In response to Commtss.ioner Matthews, Mr. Lorenz replied that the management plan for Clam B;~y would address the water flow issues and '~:' the reasons behind the demise of mangroves and how to stop or reverse same. In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Lorenz replied that the County can proceed with addressing the water flow and mangrove Issues at Clam Bay without declaring it a NRPA but the Growth Management Plan requirement will be met by doing so. Commissioner Volpe questioned why restoration is not identified as a type of protection mechanism? Mr. Lorenz responded that it ]s an oversfght and should be f, 'Included. :).: _T&p~ #4 In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Cawley responded that Clam Bay ls in a conservation area and a NRPA is not necessary to accomplish what is needed. Ms. Cawley explained that in conversations with Dr. Staiger City of Naples Environmental Protection Director he Indicated that a very complicated problem exists in Clam Bay relative to the flushing, fresh water influx, etc. Ms. Cawley stated that regulations are a national problem and a continuing problem for people Page 34 March 1, 1994 .who want to use their /and. Commissioner Saunders; ~tated that part of the agenda for the Water Workshop scheduled for March 3, 1994 is an overview and evaluation of currently existing regulatory mechanisms and hopes that thE? Board will keep the NRPA program going until after that explanation. Commissioner Saunders stated that Ms. Cawlay has indicated that the County should not engage in further regulatol'y programs until it better understands all programs currently in existence and also that the County should not engage in further acqutsit~on of land because there is already 60 to 65 percent under private ownership. Gommtssioner Saunders stated that the conclusion he draws from those statements is that the Board should do nothing. He stated that the protection and preserving of recharge areas for potable water and the establishment of NRPA's to assist in that regard is critical and needs Immediate attention. Commissioner Constantine stated that the key issue is ~{ater and Collier County's water sources as it grows; NRPA's only address the issue in part and are not the answer. C~Assioner Constantine moved to have Staff prepmrs m~ndaents to the Growth ~mnmg~m~nt Plum eliminating the re,~uirements thz~ County ha~ placed upon Itself for ~RPA's, and expend that tile addressing the ~otable water Co~issloner Volpe ~est~oned if the County does not ~o through with establishing a process and criteria for identifying NRPA, which Includes those areas already protected by other programs and land ~nder private o~ershJp, how the results will be obtained? Co~Jssioner Constantine stated that two (2) full tame employees are dedicated to the NRPA p~ogram and their tlze should be focused on the water issue. Commissioner Saunders stated that he cannot support the motion because At is a mistake to backtrack on the Gomprehensive Plan. Commissioner Matthews stated that she cannot support the motion because the Board finally has the NRPA program presented in substan- Page 35 ~arch 1, 1994 ?.~i' tfal form and it allows for termination in the future but now ts ~[:,[ipremature. She remarked that it must see how the process works before f? it is terminated. Upon call for the qu,eation, the notion failed 2/3 (Co~alselonere Saun~er~, Volpe and Matthews opposed). Cm~alsstoner $aunderm moved to have Staff continue to develop the ~tPA program, the criteria continued to be r,~vtewed by El:TAB and public co~nt eolicttat~d and the first NRPA evaluation to be Clam Bay. mcandad by Conle~loner Matthews. In response in Commli~stoner Volpe, Mr. Lorenz stated that adoption of an ordinance is necessary for an area to be declared a NRPA and Information obtained during research may tncSude recommendat:tons to amend the Future Land Use Plan, codes, ordinances, etc. In order to Incorporate that Information into the appropriate mechanism. In response to Mr. Lorenz, Co.mtaeloner Saunders withdrew that portio~ of the motion relative to review by lIPTAB and pmblic couant solicitation since it te already Included in the process and amended the motion to include that Staff ie to proceed ,tth the appropriate ordtn~u~-es to d~slgnate Clam Bay as the first NRPA. Commissioner Volpe stated that an Interlocal agreement with the City of Naples should be pursued if the County actively lnve:~ttgates a solution to the Clam Bay problem since it ts located in both the City and County. Commissioner Volpe requested that restoration should also be addressed in the motion. Co~tssto~r Smundera mmendad the notion to include restoration. 0o~tssloner Constantine stated that he is concerned that the pro- cess can be abused and a dollar figure should be attached, similar to variance requests, so that: the system does not get bogged down with ' of County Commissioners. requests. Commissioner Matthews ,;tated that EPTAB will be investigating requests by individuals f¢,~ consideration of areas as NRPA's. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that the checkpoint is the Board Page 36 March 1, 1994 Mr. Lorenz stated that a first step can be added to the process wherein before Staff prepares a technical memorandum, a list Is com- plied of requests for areas to be considered af~ NRPA's and presented to the Board for authority to proceed. Commissioner Saunders a~tMed the ~otton to Include that Staff ~t~rl~ to p=~ with th~ tec~tcal ~r~d~. ~e ~lso ~ded ~ ~tl~ to ~ Cl~ ~y t~ the first ~re~ constder~ ~ ~ ~A but ~fo~ ~i~ laird ~s~rs tMt the City of ~ples is ~1111ng to ~ter ~to ~ ln~erloc~l ~grs~nt to ~sslst in the Cl~ ~y pro~ect ~ ~ is to ~1~ ~d ~ · ~rt of that process. Co~lsstoner Hatthe~s stated that she is hesitant to a~end the second ~cauae she feels the County should ~ove forward on the Clam ~y pro~ect whether the City of Naples Is wllltng to participate or Coulsstoner Constantine stated that ~hen variances or proposed ~en~ents ~re presented to the Land Development Code, an application fee is re~lred because it takes up Staff tt~e and tn turn costs tax- p~yer ~oney; therefore, a fe~ n~eds to b~ attached to r~uests for ~re~s to be considered as a NItPA. Coatsstoner Volpe stated that he prefers to s~e ~hether the pro- cess is abused before assessing a fee. Coulsston,r Norris stated that Mr. Lorenz informed the Board that there Is no need for a NRPA lr~ order to address the Clam Bay issue. ~s stated that this sounds like a government program that appears to ~ accomplishing something but ends up being a re~latory octopus in the future and he cannot support the Callastoner Volpe questlc, ned how stormwater drainage fits Into the procmss because wat,r quality Is an issue and various basins drain Into Cl~ Bay, Vanderbilt Bay or Vanderbilt Lagoon. Mr. Lorenz explained that stormwater drainage fits in the process only If the County is looking at a NRPA that is a very Important flow way as a natural system which the County will want to protect for Page 37 March l, 1994 Its natural characteristics s~nce it is part of the water shed system. D~ call for the question, the mot/on carried 3/2 (Contlelonars ~I~ OF ~ CO~'~ ~E~ AUDITORS, COOPERS & L~D, TO ~~ FIN~CI~ A~I~ 0F ~[E SOLID WASTE COLLECTION S~VICE ~IS~S - CO~I~D TO ~ETINO OF ~CH 8, 1994 In response to Commissioner Volpe, David Russell, Solid Waste Acting Director, stated that the arrangement with Coopers & Lybrand to perform financial audits of the solid waste collect]on service franchisees is the same as last year but is being brought before the Board because it is a change order to the contract and requires Board approval. Couisstoner Volpe stated that when the Board approved the contract, the annual audit was approved and allowed Coopers & Lybrand to offer to perform additional services that would result in cost savings. Commissioner Volpe questioned if Mr. Russell is satisfied that the audit as proposed to be completed by Coopers & Lybrand is a competitive price. Mr. Russell replied that the Judgment as to the best auditing value is left to the Judgment of the Clerk's Office and the Finance Department is in support of this arrangement. · Commissioner Volpe stated that at the time of the contract award, /~{;~Coopers a Lybrand assured the Board that the financial audits would be "~ completed more sufficiently if the contract was renewed with them. i' ~ It wms the consensus of the Board to continue this 1tel to the ~,'. ~eetLng of March 8, 1994. (goo) l~IEW OF THE I~ECO~NDATION IIY THE TOURIST DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL AND FINAL FUNDXN~ DECISION R~GARDING PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY THE NAPLES NATION&L GOLF CLUB, INC., FOR TOURIST TAX FUNDING IN THE TOURISM GRANT PROG1tAM (CATEGORY C) - APPROVED Mike Smykowski, Acting Budget Director, stated that on November 1, 199~, the Collier County Tour]st Development Council (TDC) met to Page 3 8 March 1, 1994 review proposals submitted in Category C, the special events category, and make recommendations to be considered by the Board. He explained that a final decision by the TDC regarding the Naples National Gold Club, Inc. proposal was deferred unttl the TDC meeting in February, 1994, as the applicant was negotiating with ESPN for television coverage and was also attempting to secure flnancial sponsorship for the event. Mr. Smykowski explained that on February, 7, 1994, the TDC met and reviewed the Naples National Golf Club, Inc. proposal and it ~,as una- nimously approved in the amount of $62,000, subject to clarification of the budget for the event by the applicant. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Smykowskt explained that the Naples National Golf Club, Inc. has secured some sponsors but the event does not have complete sponsorship. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Smykowskt stated that the application meets all requirements established by the TDC and the applicant is aware that if the event generates a proflit, the Golf Club will be required to return dollar for dollar. Co~telloner Norris moved, seconded by Co~atsstoner Natth~s and c&rrted unanimously, to approve the Grant Application ~ub~ttted by the l~pl~ National ~olf Club, Inc. for tourist tax funding in the, Tourism ~rant Program. (1022) ~ORE ORDER ~CEC-1 FOR PROFES!IIONAL SERVICES FOR FIELD SURVEY AND AERIAL PHOTO~]tAFHY SERVICES AWARDED TO COASTAL K~GINEERINQ IN THE AI~OUNT OF 842,8?5 AS A PR!:LIHINARY STEP IN THE DESIGN AND PERHITTING OF TH~ FOUR LANING OF GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD FROM C.R. 951 RUNTlING EAST APP~OX~TELY 5 1/4 MILES TO 2ND STREET N.E. (O~E BLOCK PAST WILSON BOULEVARD) - APPROVED Conunlsstoner Volpe stated that this project is geared for 1996/1997 and within the five (5) year work program there Is a $1~0,000 expenditure for surveying and aerial photography and questioned if this request meets the criteria for funding this year. Tom Conracode, Office of Capital Project Management Director, 'clarified that $150,000 in ca, try forwards is allocated for this pro- Pa{le 39 March l, 1994 ~ect but this work order is for approximately $43,000'. Mr. Conrecode explained that the work order does not meet the criteria for gas tax allocations. Mr. Conrecode stated that the survey and aerial work must be completed so that Staff can begin the in-house design. Commissioner Volpe moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews and cmrr~ed 4/0 (Comm~seloner Norr~ out) to award Work Order #CEC-! for profemm~onml services for field survey and aerial photography services to Co4~tml Kngineerlng in the amount of $42,8?5. Page 40 March 1, 1994 ltn#10A ~$OLUTION 94-136 R~ ZSTJ~LISHING aUIDgLiNES FOR R~CEIVIII~ I~ECOVO~EIIDATIONS FOR AP~I~ 0F ~ERS T0 ADVISORY CO~I~EES Commissioner Constantine stated that 41 days are allocated to each advisory board to return recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners for appointment of members, except the quasi-Judicial boards that are not requested to make a recommendation. Administrative Assistant to the Board Ftlson questloned if Staff is to continue to review and categorize the applicants Into area of expertise and assure that applicants are licensed and minimum position requirements are met? Commissioner Constantine replied in the affir- mative. Co~aleotoner Constantine uoved, seconded by 0omateeloner Matthews and carried unaniBously, that all Advisory Boards, with the exception of (l~a~t-Judicial Boards, make recommendations for appointment of beta for Board of County Commissioners review, thereby adopting Re~olutton 94-136. Page 41 ~arch 1, 1994 RESOLUTION 94-137 ~POINTIN~ DONALD YORK TO THI COLLIIR COUNTY P~I~ COt~ISSION - ADOPT[:D Upon selection of a member for appointment to the Collier County Planning Commission, Cou~s~ioner Volpe moved, seconded by Comimatoner Constantine Imd carried unanimously, that Donald York be mpl~ointe~ as the representative from District 2 to fulfill the term mxptrtn~ October 1, 1996 vacated by Franklin B~cer, thereby adopting Re~olutlon 94-137. Page 42 March 1, 1994 Ita#12Cl '- R~qUEST FOR AM~NIX~NT TO COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 91-10, AS AI~NDED, (TR~ ~ODUCTIVI~' CO~I~EE ORDIN~CE) BY PROVIDING FOR THE C~TION OF ~E CO~ GO~:~ PRODUCTIVI~ SUB-CO~ITTEE V~OUS S~Y CO~I~EES THEREUNDER - COU~ ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO D~ ~SOLUTION C~TING A TASK FORCE TO BE PRESE~ED TO THE BO~D AT ~E ~CH 8, 1994 ~ETING Commissioner Matthews stated that the Board of County Commissioners approved the formation of a subcommittee for the Productivity Committee and through meetings with the Productivity Committee, has accepted Its recommendations for structuring the subcommlttee. Commissioner Constantine questloned the merit behind creating a subcommittee rather than a separate committee? Commissioner Matthews responded that she requested a task force for a duration of two to three (2-3) years but: the Board of County Co~missioners approved a subcommittee. Commissioner Saunders stated that Collier County has 41 advisory boards and the number stays the same by creating a subcommittee. Commissioner Constantine stated that the Vice Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners is recommended as serving on the subcom- mittee but it should be open for any Board member. Commissioner Volpe stated that the Chair typically appoints a member to committees. County Attorney Cuyler stated that ad-hoc committees are normally for a duration of one (1) year but the resolution can reflect a longer duration. The following person spoke on this item. Bill Neron Commissioner Matthews moved, seconded by Co~1tsslonsr Saunders Lnd carried ~nlmovsl¥, that Ordinance 91-10 not 1~ amended and the County Attorney's Office d=aft a resolution cremating a task force for revle~ It the March 8, 1994 s~etlng. Commissioner Matthews volunteered to serve on the task force. (1580) Page 43 March l, 1994 ]~TION TO ADOPT CERTAIN AJ(~]TDM~NTS TO THE COLLIER COUNTY CABLE T~$IO~ FRAnChISE ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR ~~ TO DI~FINITIONS, ~DI~ ~R ~DI~ICATI0~ OF ~CHISE PROVISIONS, PROVIDIN~ FOR ~DIPICATION OF LIQUIDATED D~GES PROVISIONS, PROVIDING FOR TO CO~ ~O~ION PROVISIONS ~ PROVIDING FOR ~TE REGU~TION - T~ ~IL ~CH 8, 1994 MEETING Jennifer Edwards, Assistant to the County Manager, stated that she addressing, for clarification purposes, the FCC standards, customer service standards and other amendments to the Collier County Cable Television Franchise Ordinance. She explained that two (2) weeks ago the Board of County Commissioners directed Staff to meet with cable operators to reach an agreement on the customer service standards and an agreement has been reached except on the is:sue of enforcement of the standards. Ms. Edwards stated that on Item 3.2, Standard Installations, of the proposed customer ser,/lc,m regulations, Staff is recommending the addition of a clause wher~ the operator will be able to obtain a per- mit before the Standard takei~ affect. Me. Edwards stated that Item 2.4, Non-standard Installation, is to include wording relative to availability of equipment within a reason- able time. ~s. Edwards explained that Item 2.6, Appointment ~lndows. under the section on Violations, i~ to exclude customer fault cause, i.e. television is not plugged in, remote control batteries are d~ad, etc. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Ms. Edwards explained that the operator will determine if the problem with service is the customer's fault. ~' Commissioner Constantine questioned who will arbitrate a problem ~i.~ if the customer and the operator disagree? Me. Edwards stated that the relationship with the operators has been that they are reasonable. She explained that she met with Cable Vision, Industries (CVI) prior to this meeting and it opposes any type of enforcement standards. Commissioner Constantine stated that standards should not be created tf they are not enforceable. Page 44 March 1, ~994 Ms. Edwards stated that the changes are designed for future as well as current operators. Commissioner Volpe stated that a record of complaints is kept and at the time of franchise renewal, the record is checked for customer {i~ . complaints. Commissioner Constantine pointed out that the franchise may be for 15 years and there is no way to enforce the standards until Time for the franchise to be renewed. Ms. Edwards stated that this is Collier County's opportunity to establish and enforce standards; records will be kept regarding dif- ferences between customers and operators and the Board of County Commissioners can propose arbitration if a problem arises. Heidi Ashton, Assistant County Attorney, stated that the FCC stan- dards have been adopted by resolution and noted these chanqes are an attempt to clarify the standards and only one item is more restrictive than the FCC standard. She explained that under the Collier County ordinance there is a mechanism to enforce the standards, such as ser- vice interruption, through pro rata rebates. Commissioner Constantine questioned what the mechanisms are for enforcement of the rebates? In response to County Manager Dotrill, Ms. Ashton stated that the County has no police powers for enforcing rebates or bringing opera- tots before the Code Enforcement Board. She explained that under the current Ordinance, provisions for customer service standards are included in the liquidated damages section so that if the rebates are not being made as determined by the County Manager's Office, the County Manager can submit a Notice of Intent to Assess to the cable operator indicating that they are failing to comply with rebates or refunds. Ms. Ashton explained that the cable operator can then request a hearing before tht~ Board of County Commissioners and it becomes a matter of proof. Commissioner Constantint~ stated that an effort to bring cable ~ television rates down has evolved into a seven (7) step process before 77 Page 45 ~arch 1, 1994 anything can be accomplished if a cable operator and a customer disagree over a $10.00 rebate. He pointed out that Staff time and taxpayer money is being wasted. County Manager Dorrlll stated that failure to pay an asses~ment for l~quidated damages on appeal to the Board of County Commissioners will necessitate obtaining a court order establishing the fine. Ms. Ashton stated that the ultimate police power will be refusal to renew the franchise if recurred violations have not been satisfied. Commissioner Volpe stated that the Board of County Commissioners has adopted customer servicE: standards for cablevision already and these proposed regulations are not more restrictive and there is no enforcement mechanism. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that the only other franchisee in Collier County is waste collection and its agreement addresses customer complaints so there is a mechanism to be worked through. Commissioner Norris pointed out that protecting the consume~' is important but the FCC has set standards and those are the standards by which Collier County should abide, and not set stricter standards. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that there is no enforcement of the FGC standards. Ms. Edwards pointed out that the Solid Waste Agreement is only five (5) years old whereas the Cable Franchise Agreement is 27 years old. She explained that other communities working with more current franchise agreements contain the kind of standards included ~n the proposed regulations for penalties and liquidated damages. Commissioner Constantine pointed out that the Board of County Gommlssioners' role is the health, safety and welfare of the community a~d this does not fall under those categories. He stated that some of the requirements are silly, especially when there is no way to enforce them, and when controlling rates is what the public is clamortng for. Commissioner Constantine explained that the Staff time and ta;:payer money expended to enforce the proposed regulations will result in higher rates by the cablevision franchises. ~00~ I]~()~ 78' Page 46 March 1, 1994 Ms. Edwards stated that the County has the opportunity to regulate both rates and customer service standards and what the proposed regu- lations accomplish is a clearer definition of what the County is enforcing. Commissioner Norris pointed out that the County should not be telliDg a cablevision company the hours it can operate. Ms. Edwards stated that Colony Cablevision is in agreement with the proposed regulations wherein CVI is against enforcement. Ken Fuchs of Colony Cablevision stated that this company is sup- portive of the FCC standards as adopted and of the proposed changes which should not have a negative affect on customer rates. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Ms. Edwards informed the Board that the advisory board has reviewed and is In agreement with the proposed rule amendments. John Craig, General Manager of Cable Vision Industries, stated that CVI had 2,000 subscribers in 1984 and there are 16,000 subscri- bers today. Mr. Craig explained that CVI had more stringent regula- tions in affect for customer service than those adopted by the FCC. He stated that by these proposed additional restrictions, it appears that CVI has been operating incorrectly for the past ten (10) years when it has not received criticism from the County. Mr. Craig explained that more restrictions, i.e. debatable violations, will prohibit Investing capital dollars for future use and expansion of services. Mr. Craig stated that he prefers to resolve complaints In-house and at the time of franchise renewal, the County should Investigate how many complaints have been brought against a conapany. ''' &t this time Recording Secretary Metz replaced Recordln~ Secretary The following people spoke on the subject. Ron Pure :..., Chester Dobeck ~ ' John J. Keschl ,Tape e~ · !', William Gaston ~;., Brad Estes ~":' Frances C. Barsh In response to Commissioner Constanttne,s inquiry regarding the minimal cost involved to adopt the Amended Ordinance and enforce the Page 47 March I, ]994 Adopted Consumer Protection Standards, Ms. Edwards replied that there will not be any incremental costs, however, there may be some costs involved to attend training ~3essions and to purchase manuals and hand- books from the FCC. She pointed out that Staff is requesting that the Board authorize a Budget Amendment for $2,500 to cover these costs. In response to Commis[~ioner Constantine, Ms. Edwards explained that the application fee for new franchisees is set at $]0,000 instead of up to $10,000 in order to set a standard. She further stated that $10,000 is what has been charged in the past. Commissioner Volpe asked if there should be a d~fferentiation in the fee on renewals, to which Mr. Fuchs responded that the renewals deal with a known entity, and that Involves about half the time and cost involved in the research process required for new applicants. Ms. Edwards agreed, howev~r, she pointed out that the agre~ment with the current operators is 30 years old, and there have been many changes and technological .advances that mus~ be d~a]t with. She stated that it should be kept in mind that it is going to require con- sultant time to develop ne~ franchise agreements before considering a ~eduction in the fee. Co~tssioner Saunders ~;ug~ested that Section 3.7 regarding the te~ms of the franchise be (:hanged to a term no longer than 10 years, · .~d that the renewal will be for a period not to exceed 10 years; and that the renewal fees under Section 3.4A be changed to $5,000, pro- ~lding ~he evaluation costs do not exceed $5,000, in which case there will be an additional le,/y of up to $5,000 to cover those costs, with a cap of $10,000. M~. Ft~chs declared that th~ entire paragraph under Gross Revenues ~$ectlon 2.~6, has been re-w~it~en to broaden the categories of revenue that iS eligible for franchfse fees to approxfmately 300% greater than originally written. Commissioner Volpe clarified that Gross Revenue, for uniformity, iS determined by what the Cable Act defines as Gross Revenue, however, the definition in Section 2.16 Is not consistent with the Cable Act. Page 48 March l, 1994 Ms. Ashton responded that the definition in Section 2.16 was recommended by the Cable Consultant with minor amendments to include current technology, and to her knowledge it Js legally permissible. Mr. Fuchs pointed out that the language in this ordinance is above and beyond any Cable Ordinance he has ever seen, to include Intangibles, which is unfair and difficult to administer and account for. Co~missioner Matthews stated that barter ttez~s are being taken and made subject to a franchise fee. Mr. Fuchs agreed and disclosed that in addition, a variety of other non-customer related items, such as production time, and dollars paid to the company that have nothing to do with customary cable ser- vices are included. Commissioner Saunders a~ked Mr. Fuchs If he has concerns other than Gross Revenues and the Items Just reviewed regarding the ordinance to which Mr Fuchs referred to his letter of February 14 1994, to Ms. Edwards which fully addresses his concerns. Respondlng to Commissioner Volpe's Inquiry, Mr. Fuchs stated that Staff recommends monthly versus quarterly Franchise Fee payments because currently the Fees are paid annually. He advised that quar- terly payments are customary In the Industry. Mr. Fuchs agreed with Commissioner Vo]pe that the recommended changes do not affect existing licenses that are currently providing service to the County. Mr. Fuchs Informed the Board that regarding Gross Revenues, several categories are not understandable and will need further clari- fication in order to determine the dollar impact from Franchise Fees paid to the County A discussion ensued regarding the deflnltlon of "Gross Revenues" Mr. Brad Estes recalled that the Gross Revenue definition, as agreed upon when he entered the Franchise Agreement, did not Include some of the items listed in the new ordinance, and therefore, suggested that these Issues be addressed at the time of renewal. He Pa~e 49 March 1, 1994 further stated that he prefers annual payments; of franchise fees, but he could agree to quarterly payments. Mr. Fuchs added that he is comfortable with the definition of Gross Revenue presented in the settlement between Palmer, Colony and the County. Ms. Ashton advised that the FCC recommends a five (§) y,:ar Term Of Franchise. She communicated that it is very difficult to d,:ny a renewal. Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing. Co~missioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews to spprov~ the Ordinance Amending Collier County Ordinance 88-90 with the following chants; the Franchise Fee will be a maximum of $20,000 for s new &pplicmtion and $5,000 for a renewal with authorization for the County to request an additional $5,000 to cover actual expenses; the Franchise Fee Payments will be paid quarter/y; the original Franchise Fees and the Renewal Fees will be for a maximum period of 10 years; and the Definition of Gross Revenues in Section 2.26 will be the defi- nitIon contained within the Colony, Palmer, Collier County Settlement, providing there are no problems created by doing so. Ms. Edwards commented that there are new technologies that should be included in the definit~on of Gross Revenues. Co~issioner Saunders asked that the vote on the motion be delayed for one week giving Staff the opportunity to bring the thre~ (3) defi- nitions of Gross Revenues before the Board. Com~iseloner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews and carried unani~ouely, to table the issue for one week. Commissioner Constantine directed Staff to report next ~eek if anything will prohibit the Board from changing the Definition of Gross Revenues in the future to meet the needs of changing technologies once the definition has been agreed upon. · ,o Recess 4:45 P.M. - Reconvened 4:58 P.M. ''" Item BOARD R~VIEW OF THE 800 MH:~ PUBLIC SAFETY COMM~3NICATIONS COmmITTEE SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS - STAFF TO PREPARE REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL INCLUDING LKASE OPTION, AND SHERIFF TO BE INCLUDED IN DOCUMENT REVIEW Page 50 Ma~ch 1, 1994 Co~issioner Constantine recalled that the direction given pre- wlousl¥ was for the County Manager and his Staff to work with the Sherlff's Office and the Emergency Services Department to develop a criteria needed for the 800 MHz System. He reported that there is agreement regarding at least 80~ of the Items. County Manager Dotrill revealed that his Staff met with the Sheriff'~ Department, the Chairman of the Public Safety Communications Committee, and ~htef Peterson, and that they are in full agreement with at lea~t 80~ of the System Features. He pointed out that as a result of that meeting, a Current System Overview is attached to the Change ~ist. The rationale for this, he said, is to identify and differen- tiate between what exists now in terms of radio capability with the existing VHF confi~n~ratt~n: what base 800 MHz features are contained and available as part of the Counties Administrative System, for pur- poses of comparison; determine and agree what is essential for 800 MHz, using the ABCO 16 architecture; and to acknowledge additional features, coverages or goals that are desirable, but not essential from a Public Safety standpoint, with the emphasis on Law Enforcement, Fire and EMS. Mr. Dotrill pointed out that there is some disagreement regarding the availability of any system to be constructed in such a way as to be accommodatin~ to both AnaloG and Digital Technologies. He explained it is his understanding that the Board of County Comm~ssioners would l~ke to reserve the right to take bids on an e~ther/or basis, where an Analog system would have to be convertible to Digital or be replaced at the expense of the vendor. Mr. Dotrill revealed that the Shertff's Office retained a con- sultant to prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP) which can be used as the basis for the Purchas.ing Department to prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP) by the end of the month. He disclosed that a Pre-Proposal Conference has been scheduled for eligible vendors who wish to compete for the project. Sheriff Don Hunter disclosed that there ha:~ been some confusion in Page March 1, 1994 previous discussions regarding the Needs Assessment Survey and the Performance Criteria, which is a more ~nclusive document addressing some of the larger issues, such as coverage. Sheriff Don Hunter divulged that the independent fire chiefs recommended that a technical consultant be acquired to assist with the undertaking. Sheriff Hunter revealed that the resulting document has been fully discussed with the Public Safety Committee, and that it represents a lb/blOc Safety System that can work for the Police, Fire and EMS Departments. Commissioner Constantin~ reviewed the essential system f(~atures prepared by County Manager Dartill and the essential requiren~ents that the [~ublic Safety Committee provided, and noted that there are only four (4) areas that seem to be in quest]os. The following people spoke regarding the Issue. Fire Chief Don Peterson Jerry Schuette Jack Pointer Randall Evans Responding to Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Matthews advised the Board that she will add,'ess The FCC regarding how the 27 channels assigned to the County can be protected. Cou]ssloner Vo]pe commented that It is the Countys' intent to design a system that will utilize the 27 channels allocated to the County, with the maxtmum cost effective use of simultaneous voice com- launtcatton. County Manager Dorrill reported that the 90%/90% receive/transmit por- e&hie radio coverage of the County in medium density buildings is essential in terms of coverage, and he would like to take an add alter- nate bid for the 95%/95% coverage. Coutssioner Constantine agreed the Board would like to look at the cost for both the 90%/90% and the 95%/95% coverages. CouIssIoner Volpe asked if medium density buildings include high rise buildings? Chris Nlnd, Communications Director for the Sheriff's Office replied that medium d~nsity does not include high rise buildings, therefore, high d~nslty buildings which require coverage Page 52 March 1, 1994 are Itemized in the Couuntcattons Committee document, as an annex, to Insure coverage. County Manager Dorrlll revealed that a two (2) year warranty with an option for a third (3) year is recommended because the hand held and portable radios are more susceptible to maintenance requirements, and a one (1) year warranty may not be sufficient. Gary Arnold, Emergency Management Coordinator explained that the difference in Analog versus Digital Voice Technology is the voice transmission. He disclosed That the Digital Standards have not been finalized, but it will be forthcoming In the future. He suggested that the vendors include ]n the bid how they intend to migrate the County System into Digital Technology in the future. County Manager Dotrill pointed out that migrating an Analog System Into a Digital System is an add alternate for vendors to bid. Mr. Nind contended that the EMS/Ftre paging ability listed under desirable system requirements is in fact an essential requirement. He explained that there is a need to page both EMS and Fire. He further stated that every Individual does not have a radio, therefore, there must be some form of paging; system. County Manager Dorrill noted that the pa~tn~; system is not an essential component of the 800 MHz system, however he is not opposed to the vendors addressing the paging system as ~tn overall system design. Commissioner Constantine declared that the Board of County Commissioners has not stated a preference of Simulcast over Multicast Technology. He reported that the Board wants to establish the cri- teria, and leave it open for whatever technology is available to meet that criteria. He cautioned that the wording of the RFP does not eli- mlnate any available technology, County Manager Dorrtll disclosed that anyone intending to bid on the project must attend a mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference. He ~nformed the Board that if ~he vendors are going to take exceptions or request clarifications to the proposal document, they will be required Page 53 March 1, 1994 to submit those concerns In writing to avoid disputes regarding the Intent of the proposal. In response to Commt~3sloner Volpe, County Manager Derrill replied that Staff recommendi~ that the next step is pending the Boards Amendments to the System Features List, and that Staff be directed to prepare the final Request For Proposal (RFP.) through the Purchasing Department. He suggested that Carlton Fields in Tampa be contacted to review the document and to ai~sist with drafting the contract document. Commissioner Constantine suggested that the Board give Mr. Camell direction to create the Request For Proposal (RFP) and get it out in a timely manner. Sheriff Hunter requested that the Sheriff's Office continue to be included in the document review process, to which Commissioner Constantine replied in the affirmative. Commissioner Norris moved that Mr. Camell b,s directed to create the RFP in a timely manner; ~md that Sheriff Hun~er continue to be included in the document review process. Commissioner Saunders requested that regarding the motion, and the development of a Request For Proposal (RFP), that the potential ven- dors consider leasing a system to the County, and any other Innovative financing alternatives available. Cca~sieeioner Norris &mended his motion to Include that lea,sing Information and other Innoval:ire financing alternatives be addressed in the Request For Proposal (RFP). Commissioner Constantine clarified the motion stating that everything on the list under Essential System Features and Additional Essential System Features wl].l be bid; that both 90%/90% and 95%/95% receive/transmit portable radio coverage will be bid on; and that there will be a two (2) year warranty with an optton for a third year Included in the motion. County Manager Derrill requested that the ability to make prelimi- nary contact with Carton Fields be included in the motion. Co~misstoner Norris concurred that the motion include the Page 54 Hatch !~ 2994 Upon call for the question on the floor, the ~otton carried (oo ) . Xte~ #14B C]~AI'I~A~TO FOI~MARD LETTH~ TO DEPUTT SECRETARY OF JUVENILE JUSTICE AT ~ (]I[BEHALF OF THE BOARD P~: BOOT CAMP DECISION Comslmstoner Constantine stated that he received a request fron the Shsrlff's Offtce to forward a letter to Deputy Secretary Of ':Juvenile Justice at HRS regarding the Board's decision on the Boot . Ca~p. He advised that he will forward a letter in this regard. 8? Pagv 5~ ,X~I ,140 March 1, 1994 A discussion ensued relating to the Agriculture Center. Comlisaloner Matthe~ couunlcated that when Porter Oose needs local slipport he will contact the Board of County Co--Isslonera and advise (030) :ml ,24D Cl~tI]~l~11 TO FORMJL~D L~fZi~ TO FCC AUTHORIZING CO!~rISSZ01~]~ NATTHX~J TO a lW3~I~IT~ BOJL~D OF COPlfISSXOIXIL~ The Board agreed that the Chairsan will for~ard a letter to the YCC authorizing Coutssloner Matthews to represent the Board of County Coulssioners regarding the 800 HHz System. (040) Co=-lssloner Constantine revealed that the construction of the new ~S' turn cormacting Santa Barbara Boulevard and Logan cuts through a residentlilly zoned Golden Gate Estates area. He reported that the neighborhood Is very upset because all the residents In the area did not receive formal notification of the blasting, and those who were notified, received notification last Friday. Co~tssloner Constantine stated that the notification process for dynuiting needs to be reviewed. He pointed out that families within a quarter of a mile should be notified of the blasting, and that the notification needs to be more than a three (3) day notice. County Nanager Dotrill Indicated that the provisions in the Land Development Code within the Excavation Ordinance regarding blasting requirements can be brought before the Board for raytaw within the next 3-4 weeks. (OSO) ~XSCUSSXO~ff.K: i~LXCAMItlLRSH TO B~ H'EAR~ P.A.RC'H l~, 1094 89 Page 56 March 1, 1994 County Manager Dotrill stated that the Pelican Marsh Golf Course has net all the requiresants as part of their Advance Work Authoriza- tion, and the plat has been approved but not recorded resulting from an tssue between Pelican Marsh and the adjoining property o~ner. He declared that the petitioner ts asking for the opportunity to amend the Advance Work Authorization. He noted that March 15, 1994 is the soonest this Item can be scheduled to be heard before the Board of County Com~tsstoners. Mr. Dotrill requested that the private use of the facility be granted in th~ interim, until the Board can hear the l~ubltc Petition on March 15th. $e$ ~s~o~ ~a~ndare moved, seconded t~/Con~sm~onerMatthew~ ~ the ¢on~ent agenda be approved and/or adopted: /CIrCUlaTION 94-1~T ACKNOWLKDGIN~ THE RESUBDIVISION OF TRACT ?6, A I~3RTION OF A PREVIOUSL~ XZCORDED PLAT KNOWN AS ~OLDEN GAT~ ESTATES UNIT ~O. 6 ]L~SOLUTION 94-118 A~Z~ING ~g ~S~DIVISION 0F ~ 123, A ~I~ ~ A ~IOUZLY ~CO~D P~T ~ ~ ~OLD~ ~A~ ESTATES ~T ~. 195 · ~'. Zte~ ~26A4 i~i ~SC~,~TION g4-120 ACKNOMLL'DGING A LOT LINE ~S~ 0Y LOTS 5, 6, ,~ ~ 7, ~ 47, A ~ION 0F A ~IOUSLY ~CO~D ~T ~0~ ~ s,. P.g.. HE~4~]TZON 94-221 AC]CROMLKDGIRG A TOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0X LOT G8 AND A IKIRTION OF TRACT 'A', A PORTION OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT KNOWN AS GOLF OOT'fAGE~ AT WIr!IDEMF~E, PHASE ZII See Page8 Page 57 March I, 1994 J~E~UTI0~ g&-122 ACENO~LED~ING A LOT LINE ADJUSTI(KNT OF LOTS ! AND 10, B~)CE 1T4, A PONTION OF A PRL~IOUSL¥ RECORDED PLAT ~NO~N AS MARCO KESOLOTION 94-123 AC~NOWLED~IN(~ A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF LOTS 1 AND 2, A I~ltTION OF A PI~VIOUSLY RECORDED FLAT KNOW~ AS VI~ETARDS ARBOR 04-224 ACJOIOffT.,EDaIB'a A LOT LINE ADJUSTM~T OF LOTS 28 A~D PORTION OF A PREVIOUSLY R~CORDKD PLAT KNOWN AS SAN RAPHAEL Item ~16A0 s..p.g..... //J-//4t ! ~ JI/SOLOTZON 94-120 ACJ~OWLEDGIXG A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 0Y LOTS 23, 24 ;, A~D 20, A I~ItTION OF A I~tEVIOUSLY KECORDKD PLAT ~ ~ ~S~ AT See Pages. //'~--° //6 RESOLOTION 9¢-226 ACEN~ING A ~T LI~ ~S~ 0N ~S 25 ~ 26, A ~ ~ A ~~SLY ~O~ ~T ~ ~ S~ ~L See Pages. //?- :Item #IJall ACC~T~ OF NATERAND SEWer FACILITIES FOR TOLLGATE C0~9~RCIAL, PHA~ ZI! - WITH THE STIPULATIONS AS LISTED IN TH~ EXECUTIVE SDI~ARY Item ~16&12 See Pages, DOCUNENTATIOR NOT IECEIVED AS OF MAY 9, 1994 · K~3T. OTI~ 94-127 ACENOMLED(]ING THE RESUBDIVISIO)I OF TRACT 103, A PO~TI~ OF & Fl~VlOUSLY RECORDED PLAT KNOW~ AS GOLDEN GATE ESTATES See Pages /a/- .o, §1 Page 58 J13~f~T. lTTZOg 94-]S2 A~THORIZING THE ACC~PTARCE OF 'TOLLGATE CCgqIqH~CIAL GI31TI~, IPffAJg TillS' AJID AUTHORIZING PIqELIMINARY ACCEPTAWCK OF Tu~ ~OAJ:~lA~', D~AI'~M~, MAT~:R AJID S~le~R IKPR~; ~ ACCgFTING THE Z~OC&B~ ~ OY CREDIT F~OH ~ DL~rf~P~R FOR I~AZR'I'~J~AJIC~ OF TI~ ~ FOR A I~XI~ OF O)[g ~ - NIT~ TI~ STIPUT~tT~ORS AS PARAGRAP~ FIVE OF R~SOLI3TZOII 94-618 TO IN TJlZ LEGAL DESCRIPTIOH FOR FOR !~01~3~TY DESC"RISHD A~ GOLDEN GATE 17 '* %tl ~IUl - Mg~e~4 to Item ,8B2 Zt~ ~ - ~ to zt~ ~IB3 Ztt ~16D2 ~I~TI~FJI~'"TIO~N OF Jlq2TZCE OF I~ROMISE TO PAY AND AaRZKMI3FT TO KXTKND FA~ O~ ~ I~I~&CT ~ FOR KAY R. HIT, E, ARD ~ ~ DZA]fA TRYON See Pages Page 59 March 1, !994 BID ~4-,22 St ~ ~ COIITROL DISTRICT GRJOIT R~QUEST FOR A 50 F~tCKNT 3[tom See Pages RZ~3LOl~C~ 94-134 AUT~0RZZI~G ~ ~X:ECUTZ011JLRD ACCEFTA~C~ 0F AJ~ T~ A~o~rfo~ $70,274 See Pages Item BID d~21S0 ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~.' l~ ~ ~ 0F 885,320 ' Its J/14~ - IlsFad to ltn J8~4 Itet HI - hieted · TXL~-SON!3~ CO~fl~UCTXON, RADIO ROAD FOUR LAIDZIG $5,300 - MITH TIlE STIPU~qTI~ A~ LI~D IN Sea Pages /~"' /'~" FORMIL BID PROCI~$ MAIVXD; AMAJ~D 0Y A SOLE SOURCE I:~OCURD(Z]FT 0Y AR AT&T D~FII'ITT TKLI:FHOWE STSTK~ FOR TI~ ~ ZIMOKALKK IXKRGI31CY ~. SI::RVZCZ:~ CI:FFI:R II THI ~ OF $~0,f5~3.05 See Pages Page 60 .' II[~~ COR]I~I:~)llDE]I'C~ - FILED AJgD/ORREFKRRED March 1, 1994 The following slscellaneoue correspondence was flied and or referred ae presented by the Board of County Co~mieslonere: ~o~ I)00,,~ 94 Page Hatch 1, 1994 11:13KY~ATZC)IS ~O ~ GOLDI:11 G&/"E ~O~5'TA?ZO~ ~!1 ~ AJ, IOO'JI'T OF $2,200 There being no further bueJnema for the Good of the County, the ~eet~ng ~&s adjourned by Order of the Chalr - ?1he= 5=50 P.M. BOARD OF COTJ~TY CO!~4ISSZONKRS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/~X OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL~D~&~TRICTS UNDER ITS ao preaented approved by the ~oard on /~}l .... ~,/~/' or as corrected Page 62