BCC Minutes 04/12/1994 RNaples, Florida, April 12, 1994
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in
and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning
Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as
have been created according to law and having conducted business
herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building
"F" of the Government Complex, East Nap/es, Florida, with the
following members present:
CHAIRMAN: Timothy J. Constantine
VICE-CHAIRMAN: Betrye J. Matthews
John C. Norris
Michael J. Volpe
Burr L. Saunders
ALSO PRESENT: Sue Barbtrettt, Ellis Hoffman, and Marilyn
Fernley, Deputy Clerks; Nell Dorrtll, County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County
Attorney; David Weigel and David Bryant, Assistant County Attorneys;
John Yonkosky, Assistant to the County Manager; Mike McNees, Acting
Utilities Administrator; Wayne Arnold, Acting Site Plan Review
Director: Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects Management
Director; Dick Clark, Acting Community Development Services
Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation Services
Administrator; Bob Mulhere, Acting Current Planning Manager; Mike
Smykowski, Acting Budget Director; Thomas Whitecotton, Human Resources
Director; Russ Muller, Transportation Engineer; David Russell, Acting
Solid Waste Management Director; Stan Litsinger, Growth Management
Chief; Barbara Cacchione, Sam Saadeh, Ron Nino, and Michelle
Edwards-Arnold, Planners; Harry Huber, Technical Services Supervisor;
and Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the Board.
Page
April 12, 1994
Tape #1
(206)
~Ztll #2
AaK~DA - APPROVED WITH CHANOKS
Centseisner Nettie moved, aeconded by Connieeisner Matthew~ and
carried unanimously, to approve the agenda with the changes as
detailed on the Agonda Change Sheet, and the follo~ing additional
Item #11A - D~scusslon and update by Sheriff Don Hunter
regarding the proposed boot camp - Contlnued to April 19, 1994
meeting.
Item #9A - Update on matters relating to the Point Marco
Parking Lot - Continued to April 19, 1994.
Item #16C1 - BCC to consider a requeet by the Romelees
Advisory Committee to send members to an affordable housing
management education program - Moved to Item #8C!
Page 2
April 12, 1994
(21o)
Itel #IA
CONSKNT A~ENDA - APPROVED A]FD/0R ADOPTED
The lotion for approval of the consent agenda is noted under Itel
#16.
(218)
Itel #3
MI]TOTKS OF TH~ RK(IULARMEETXN~ OF MARCH 15, 1994 AND BUD(JET NORKSHOP
OF MARCH 16, 1994 - APPROVED
Co-~isstoner Matthews loved, seconded by Co~aissioner Norris and
carried unanilouely, to approve the Minutes
March 15, 1994 and Budget Workshop of March 16, 1994.
(24o)
Itel
EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS - PRESENTED
Commissioner Norris congratulated the following employees for
service with Collier County Government:
Gall A. Watson - 15 Years, Library - Presented
Patricia M. Lehnhard - 10 Years, Agriculture - Presented
Micah K. Massaquoi - 5 Years, 0CPM - Presented
Jack B. Randolph - 5 Years, Facilities Management - Not Presented
(279)
Itel #4B
JODI MORELOCK, PUBLIC SERVICES DIVISION, AS EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH FOR
APRIL, 1994 - ADOPTED
Commissioner Constantine moved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe and
carried unanilously, that Jodi Morelock, Public Services Division, be
designated as Employee of the Month for April, 1994.
(342)
PROCLAMATION DESXGNATXNO TUESDAY, APRIL 12, 1994, AS FRIENDS OF TH~
LIBrArY DAY - ADOPTED
Upon reading the proclamation, Commissioner Matthew~ loved,
seconded by Commissioner Saunders and carried unanimously, that the
Proclamation designating Tuesday, April 12, 1994, as Friends of the
Page 3
April 12, 1994
Library Day.
Mr. Kenneth Hurst, President of Friends of the Library, accepted
the proclamation and promised continued support.
Sydney Mell~nger, Chatrpereon of the Library Advteor¥ Board,
expressed her appreciation for the Friends of the Library.
Page 4
April 12, 1994
(soo)
Ztem #S
BUDGET AMENDMENTS 94-217, 94-305, 94-309, 94-315 AND 94-324 - ADOPTED
Acting Budget Director Mike Smykowskt requested adopt/on
of the five routine Budget Amendments as shown in the Executive
Summary.
Commissioner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews and
carried unanimously, that Budget Amendments 94-217, 94-S05, 94-309,
94-315 and 94-324 be adopted.
(522)
Item #8A1
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY TECHNICAL ADVISORY BOARD RE LARGUAGE THAT COULD
PERMIT "CjustERING" IN NATURAL R~SOUXCE PROTECTIONAR~&S - STAFF TO
EVALUATE PROPOSAL FOR BCC CONSIDER&TION
Robert Duane, representing Environmental Policy Technical Advisory
Board (EPTAB), stated that EPTAB is requesting that the Board consider
amending the Growth Management Plan to permit "cjustering" in the
Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPA) to allow for the density to
be cjustered. He said that presently in the Agricultural Zoning
District one unit is permitted on five acres.
Mr. Duane stated that EPTAB recommends implementing cjustering
provisions that are tailored to provide flexibility to plans that are
brought before the Board.
Commissioner Matthews stated that this request is similar to the
direction given to Staff regarding transfer of development rights.
Commissioner Saunders loved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe, that
Staff be directed to explore the concept of cjustering units.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Duane stated that the
request will effect only rural NRPA's pursuant to the adoption of
the plan.
The following people spoke on the subject:
George Keller Bill Neron
Commissioner Matthews remarked that the motion on the floor will
not direct to Staff to make any changes to the Growth Management Plan.
Page
April 12, 1994
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Saunders confirmed
that the motion will direct Staff to evaluate the proposal concerning
cjustering of units and bring their findings before the Board.
Commissioner Norris suggested that Staff consider the proposal
from the environmental and property owners aspect.
Upon call for the question, the motion carried un~nlRouol¥.
(glS)
REQUEST FOR BCC TO GO I~O ~IVATE SESSION TO DISCUSS
~GUAGE BY ~E DEP~~ OF CO~I~ A~AIRS (DCA) TO ~CH A
STI~D SE~L~ AG~~ BE~ COLLIER CO~ ~ DCA RE
FI~IN~ OF NOT IN CO~LI~CE RE~TI~ TO ~E DELETION 0F CERTAIN
D~INA~E PR0~CTS ~0M ~ CO~RE~SI~ P~ AS P~T OF ~E 1993
GRO~ ~AG~ P~ ~~S - P~LIC SESSION HELD= ~CT DCA
PROPOS~ - APPR0~D= ST~ DISCTED TO P~S~ RESOL~ION
~E ~PROVAL OF BCC
County Attorney Cuyler stated that Assistant County Attorney
Bryant would review the State Statute so that the Board could consider
the option of meeting in private to discuss this matter.
Commissioner Saunders remarked that it seems to be the consensus
of the Board to discuss'the Issue publicly.
Commissioner Matthews commented that she would only agree to a
private session if the Board was involved in sensitive negotiation.
County Attorney Cuyler pointed out that a court reporter would be
present at a private session, so a copy of the session would be
available for the public.
Assistant County Attorney Bryant informed the Board that there is
an ethical responsibility to share any proposed settlement of any
pending litigation. He stated that the County Attorney's Office feels
that the strategy regarding this matter is important enough to be
discussed privately.
Commissioner Constantine agreed with the intent of the Statute.
He stated that the Board is concerned with the publtc's right to par-
ticipate.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Bryant replied that this is
an excellent opportunity to breech this area.
Page 6
April 12~ 1994
County Attorney Cuyler stated that this is not a new Issue for
County Attorney's. He said it is extremely difficult to discuss liti-
gation in the publlc sector.
Coulsstoner Constantine announced that it Is the consensus of the
Board to discuss this issue in a public forum.
Commiss~oner Saunders stated that the proposal received from DCA
seems more costly than if the Board had proceeded with the storm-
water management drainage system. He remarked that because the system
was rejected in the first instance, he does not see how the Board can
accept a settlement that would be more costly.
Stan Litsinger, Growth Management Chief, gave a brief history of
the issue.
Mr. L~tsinger explained that because a hearing is scheduled to
begin on April 19, 1994, Staff feels that it Is necessary to try to
reach an accommodation prior to the formal hearing.
Mr. Litsinger reported that Staff has drafted new language that
reflects Board policy and forwarded a proposed settlement to the DCA
on February 3, 1994. He categorized that the DCA's response as "no
movement". He stated that Staff cannot recommend approval of the pro-
posed settlement based on the Board's previous policy statements.
Mr. L~tsinger revealed that negotiations are continuing.
Comm~ssioner Saunders suggested that Mr. Litsinger present Staff~s
proposal to the Board for consideration. He also suggested that the
County Attorney meet w~th each Commissioner to discuss settlement
possibilities.
Mr. Bryant announced that the reason Staff submitted a settlement
proposal to DCA was to show that the Board of County Commissioners is
negotiating in good faith.
Col~ssioner Saunders moved, seconded b~ Commies~oner Matthew~ and
carried unanimous/y, to reject the proposed settlement agreement.
Cow~isstoner Saunders moved that Staff be d~rected to continue to
attempt to resolve this issue ~ith the Department of Community
Affairs, subject to approval I~ the Board of CountF Comm~ssionere.
Page 7
12, 1994
Commissioner Volpe stated that he is not supportive of that
approach.
Co~tsslonsr Saunders withdrew his aotton.
Commissioner Constantine stated that the Intent of the motion is
that Staff is negotiating in good faith, but nothing is binding
w~thout Board approval.
Commissioner Volpe suggested that Staff prepare a general outline
of their recommendations to the Board for consideration.
Mr. Litsinger presented the Board with a redraft of Exhibit B. He
stated that the redraft incorporates the Boa=dis previous policy rela-
tive to a public decision regarding future drainage improvements. He
stated that the redraft introduces the voters into the decision pro-
cess. He revealed that Staff recommends that the Board enter into a
stipulated agreement on the condition that any future drainage basin
studies would be accomplished subsequent to a referendum question at a
general election as to whether the populace wish for the Board to
enter into the studies which would result in all the information being
gathered as identified in the policies that DCA has enunciated. He
said that the redraft clearly states that should the referendum issue
fail, the matter would end. Secondly, Staff proposes that pFior to
this referendum a public information program be'established to ~nform
the voters of the merits of enhanced drainage systems.
Mr. Litsinger indicated that the second stage would be should the
studies be completed there would be a second referendum to ascertain
if the voters supported the revenue measures to support the necessary
capital improvements.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Bryant stated that the
South Florida Water Management District (SF~MD) are doing certain stu-
dies but not the detailed studies that the consultants needed.
In response to Commiss~oner Matthews, Mr. Bryant stated that the
consultant should coordinate their research with SFWMD.
In response to Commissioner Volpe,' Mr. Litsinger confirmed that
this proposal anticipates a general County-wide election.
Page 8
April 12, 1994
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Litsinger stated that
the public information program would bo directed primarily from
Environmental Services. He said that Mr. Lorenz has indicated that he
would require an additional position in order to conduct the training
program. He reported that the funding would come from the
appropriated Environmental Services budget.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, County Attorney Cuyler
stated that Information of a factual nature is allowed on a ballot.
He said that according to law an evenhanded explanation is to be pro-
rided.
Commissioner Constantine stated that he is uncomfortable with any
public relation effort on an issue that appears on a ballot.
Commissioner Norris remarked that it is very important to proceed
properly on this issue because of the large amount of money involved.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Litsinger stated that
if the referendum fails, there will be a complete rewrite of the
drainage element.
Mr. Litsinger stated that Staff feels one of the cornerstones of
the entire Growth Management Act is public participation.
Commissioner Volpe asked if this issue could be addressed on
a basin by basin area?
Mr. Litsinger replied that the initial language drafted reflects
that policy but the Secretary rejected it because she felt that the
Board of County Commissioners had an obligation to be more proactive
in this area.
In reply Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Litsinger replied that whether a
ballot could be designed so that each basin could vote on the concept
within their basin is in the realm of possibility.
Commissioner Volpe suggested an approach that would allow the
different basin areas to have their self determination.
Commissioner Matthews agreed.
Commissioner Saunders stated that he does not intend to vote on a
motion to propose a specific settlement to DCA. He asked if he is
,00, OO0,,,t 18
Page 9
April 12, 1994
legally required to vote?
County Attorney Cuyler confirmed that he is not legally required
to vote on the motion.
Commissioner Volpe suggested that general direction be given to
Staff to submit this alternative to DCA, which would be a basin by
basin election held in November, 1996.
County Attorney Cuyler advised that general direction to Staff is
to pursue the suggestions discussed today with DCA.
Commissioner Norris pointed out that all the basins interconnect
Into a large system. He questioned tf the system would function pro-
perly if work is done on some basins and not others?
Robert Wiley, Engineering Project Manager, confirmed that
Commissioner Norris' comments are true on a broad concept, however,
the way the basins are defined isolates them from each other except in
a major event that would cause overtopping.
Commissioner Saunders stated that if there is to be a motion for a
general outline of a settlement proposal to be submitted to DCA, he
will not support the motion. He said that a better approach te to
direct Staff to work out a settlement with DCA, but indicate to them
that the negotiations are subject to approval of the Board of County
Commissioners.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that the suggestion As acceptable.
Commissioner Constantine stated that this is Just general direc-
tion.
Commissioner Volpe emphasized that Staff operates within the poli-
cies established by the Board. He said that unless the Board
establishes the policy and parameters he is unsure as to how meaning-
ful any discussions can be.
Commissioner Volpe proposed to direct Staff to continue the
settlement negotiations with DCA within the parameters that have been
discussed which essentially allow for an opportunity for public par-
ticipation through the electoral 'process which would occur on or
before November, 1996, preferably on a basin by basin area.
Page lO
April 12, 1994
Commissioner Norris commented that Staff should be able to utilize
any options at their disposal.
Commissioner Saunders said that the hazard of the proposal Is
that the Board is telling DCA that the basin by basin evaluation and
electoral process is acceptable. He stated that he is not sure that
It is acceptable because he does not know all the implications of the
proposal.
Commissioner Constantine proposed that the Board give Staff the
opportunity to negotiate, subject to approval of the Board of County
Commissioners.
Commissioner Norris agreed to that proposal.
e,e Recess 10:30 A.M. - Reconvensd 10:45 A.M. at which time
Deputy Clerk Hoffman replaced Deputy Clerk Barbirstti ~e
(3~3e)
Item ~8A3
RESOLUTIONS 94-2?3 AND 94-2?4 ~RANTINO PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE
ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF
LELY RESORT, PHASES ? AND 8 - ADOPTED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
Commissioner Volpe announced that he will abstain from par-
tictpation in Agenda Items #8A3 and #8A4 due to a conflict.
County Manager Derrill advised that this item and Item #8A4 are
requests to grant preliminary acceptance of the roadway, drainage,
water and sewer improvements for the final plat of Lely Resort, Phases
7 and 8, and accepting the water and sews= facilities of Lely Resort,
Phases 7 and 8, subject to the condition that the final release of
lien from the contractor is received. He indicated that all other
documents have been reviewed by the County Attorney.
Commissioner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and
carried 3/0 (Commissioner Yelps abstained and Cosmiceisner Matthew~
out), to grant preliminary acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water
and sewer improvements for the .final plat of Lely Resort, Phases ? and
8, and that Resolutions 94-2?3 and .94-2?4 be adopted anbJect to the
condition of receiving the final release of lien from the contractor.
Pa~e 11
Item #8A4
ACCEPTANCE OF THE WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES OF LELY RESORT, PHASES ?
AND 8 - APPROVED SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS
This Item was heard in conjunction with Agenda Item #SA3.
Co-,-ieeioner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and
carried 3/0 (Commissioner Volps abstained and Commissioner Matthews
out), to approve the water and sewer facilities of Lely Resort, Phases
? and 8, ~ubJect to the condition of recsivln~ the final re/ease of
lien from the contractor.
April 12, ~994
(~2~?)
XteR
RESOLUTION 94-275, E~TABLISHINQ A POLIC~ FOR $I(3NINQ AND TIaOPLASTIC
MARKINGS FOR ALL PLA~D AND CONSTRUCTED ROADWAYS ~:THIN
BOUNDARIES OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES - ADOPTED
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald requested that the
Board adopt a policy for signing and marking roadways within the boun-
daries of Golden Gate Estates. He remarked that this policy compli-
ments the signing program which t8 already in place. He indicated
that ~his policy addresses the issue of regulatory signing and warning
signing North and South of Alligator Alley. He noted that currently
there is no signing program in place for the area south of the Alley.
Mr. Archibald requested that the Board adopt the plan and direct
staff to implement the plan and maintain those signs. He noted that
the cost of maintaining the regulatory signs will be approximately
$11,000 per year.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Archibald explained
that the down olde of not implementing the plan is the liability the
County will be confronted with.
Tape 82
Assistant County Attorney Bryant advised that last year a verdict
was entered against the County in excess of $500,000 and the statutory
cap of $2§0,000 was paid based upon a sign issue. In addition, he
remarked that there was another double fatality in January, 1994, at
an intersection collision involving tourists from New York who had
gone through the area of Janes Scenic Drive at 55 MPH. He revealed
there are no signs in this area. He divulged that the County has been
put on notice that there will be a suit with regard to one of those
deaths, and there probably will be other suits filed on the others.
CozrmtlliOner Norris moved, seconded by Coniseioner MatthM and
carried un&nimously, to approve the recommendations of staff'and that
Relolution 94-275 be adopted.
Page 13
1994
(lOO)
Item
RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER A REQUEST B~ THE HOMELESS
ADVISORY COMMITT~! TO SEND MEMBERS TO AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING MANAGEMENT
EDUCATION PROGRAM - CONTINUED TO 4/26/94
Public Services Administrator Olltff stated that the Homeless
Advisory Committee is requesting that the County Commiss1on pay for
certain travel related expenses to allow those committee members to
attend training sesstons being offered through DCA and Miami Dade
Community College.
Mr. Olliff pointed out that the Committee's intent ts that there
is a great deal of available homeless grant montes to be applied for.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Olliff reported that
the committee envts/ons feeding and provid/ng temporary housing to the
homeless with the grant montes.
Commissioner Constantine questioned whether the Board has set any
policy with regard to these t~pes of programs.
Mr. 011iff replled that he is not aware of the Board ever taklng a
po1~c¥ stand on this ~ssue, and noted he does not believe the
Commission has ever been requested to make application for or make a
dec/s/on about applylng for any of these types of grants.
Commissioner Constantlne suggested that this item be continued for
one or two weeks and the Board can decide the types of programs that
are desired.
Co~iss/oner Volpe cited that /t would be more appropriate for a
member of staff to attend training sessions relating to grant applica-
tions rather than having a member of an advisory board attend same.
Commissioner Volpe moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews ~nd
carried unanimously, to continue this item until April 26, 1994.
(221)
Item #8~1
EMPLOYMENT A~REEMENT WITH THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR -
APPROVED WITH CHANGES
Human Resources Director Whitecotton recalled that on January 18,
1994, the Board confirmed Mr. John Drury as the Executive Director of
,oo; 000.=, 51
Page 14
April 12, 1994
the AirDeft Authority and staff was directed to prepare an employment
agreement.
Mr. Whitecotton stated that on March 29, 1994, Cha/rman
Constantine and County Attorney Cuyler met w/th Mr. Drury and nego-
tiated the agreement contained in the Executive Summary. He is
requesting that the agreement be approved and executed by the
Chairman.
Commissioner Matthews called attention to Section 4, Item D, which
Indicates that the employee will receive generally applicable salary
Increases /n add/t/on to rece/v/ng from t/me to t/me a mer/t salary
Increase. She suggested that this agreement be similar to those of
the County's other contract employees with salary Increases given on
the anniversary date as opposed to October let each year.
The Commission concurred with Comm/sstoner Matthews' suggestion.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Constantine
expla/ned that the agreement contains a termination provision with a
21 day cooling off period and three weeks severance pay.
Comm/ssioner Volpe questioned the dollar amount of the dues and
subscriptions the County would be paying. County Manager Derrill
replied that th/s amount is nom/nal.
Co~alestoner Volpe moved, secondedby Commissioner Matthews and
carried unanimously, that the employment a~TSement with Mr. John
Drury, the Airport Authority ~xecutlve Director be approved, subject
to the change of increases being given on the annivere~rV date.
Page 15
April 12, 1994
(444)
Xtem ~801
RECO~4ZNDATZOR TO APPROVE VENDORS TO SUB~ZT PROPOSALS FOR THE
OPTZN~ZATZOR OF COLLIER COUNTY LARDFILL OPERATIONS - ADDINGTON
ENVZRONHENTAL, INC.; CI~t, KBERS WAST~ SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA, INC.;
SANIFILL, INC.; AND WASTE MANAGEHENT, INC. OF FLORIDA TO PRESENT
PRELIMINARY PROPOSALS TO THE BCC
Acting Solid Waste Management Director Russell reported that the
Purchasing Department notified 1§0 firms of RFQ-21§5. He announced
that six submittals were received.
Commissioner Matthews remarked that this item relates to the opti-
mization of the Landfill operations. She noted that in two weeks the
Board will be hearing presentations on new technologies in Solid Waste
Disposal and questioned why the two items are being heard separately.
County Manager Derrill recalled that there was a concern that the
Board's intent was not clear and there was a motion, second and vote
to split the two items to accelerate landfill operations in an
Interest in some type of gas collection and management system and to
consider the extension of operating the current Naples Landfill. He
noted that the longer term desire of the Board was to evaluate alter-
native processing means to further extend the life of the landfill.
Commissioner Saunders stated that the thought was to maximize the
life of the existing landfill.
Cozmieeloner Katthew~ moved, seconded by Co--isstonsr Saunders
that thio item be continued for two weeks and heard in conjunction
with the presentations on the new technologies.
Commissioner Volpe explained that he believed the processes were
to be kept separate because looking at new technologies may drive the
process in one direction as opposed to the optimization of an existing
landfill.
Commissioner Matthews stated that she envisioned separating the
two processes to obtain the best of both worlds, without one excluding
the other.
Mr. Bob Krasowski spoke with regard to this item.
Commissioner Saunders withdrew his second to the motion.
~ ~ *. ,
:,
Pa~e 16
A~! 12~ 1994
Com~seLoner ¢onmtmntLne seconded tht motion and upon c&]~ for the
queltLon, the BotLon filled 2/3 (Co~mLeeLonere
Sl~der. opposed).
Commissioner Volpe suggested tha~ because of the ~mportance of
this ~ssue, the six firms provide lndSvidual presentations to the
Board.
Mr. Russell revealed that staff reco~izes that there are four
vendors who clearly have the resources and experience in /andfill
ac~isltion and operation: Addington Environmenta~, Inc.; Chambers
Waste Systems of Florida, Inc.; Sanifil/, Inc.; and Waste Management,
Inc. of Florida.
In response to Co~ss~oner Constantine, Hr. Russell stated that
the principals of Environmental Reclamation Services, Inc. have little
or no experience In this area. He noted
the principal operating officer, Bob Fahey, and he is no longer a part
of that team, the components are not there to operate. Additionally,
he reported that this firm did not provide the f~nancial information,
as requested, however, a $250,000 account was opened at a ~ocal bank
and the proposer stated that the team members can share financia~
respon~ibi]i~ies.
Mr. Russel/ announced that Modern Recyc~ing, Inc. is currently a
sub-contractor at the Landfill, doing construction demo~ition,
recycling, and tire processing. He indicated that this firm is doing
some operating ~n Lee County, and they are under a consent order w~th
FDEP. He revealed that the pr~ncipa~ in this firm is involved w~th a
serious indictment and court proceedings ~n New York for bribing a
public official.
Co~lssioner Norris ~oved, seconded
c~ried ~m~]y, ~o accep~ the
Inc.~ C~re W~te Syste~ of F~orida, Inc.= S~f~, Inc.~
Waste M~ge~ent, Inc. of Flo~$da= ~d staff d~rected to p~e~e the
~ for L~df~l ~lm~za~ton.
Commissioner Saunders suggested that five firms, including
,o0 000-
Page
April 12, 1994
Environmental Reclamation Services, be Invited to come before the
Board and make their presentations, prior to any formal RFP.
Conieeloner Norris amended his motion to reflect that the four
fir~, a~ etated in the original motion be invited to present their
preliminary proposals. Coniseloner Volpe accepted the amendment and
u~n call for the ~es~ion, the motion carried
Item
CONSID~TION OF ~OV~ OF ~ ~LIMIN~Y DESIGN FOR ~ COLLI~
CO~ B~CH ~STO~TIOH~ ~A~ P~ -
S~~D TO ~ ~O~A~ A~CIKS
Project Manager Huber etated that the purpose of this Item is to
provide the Board the opportunity to review and offer comments re/a-
tire to the Collier County Beach Restoration and Management Plan. He
advised that the documents presented for review are: preliminary
design plans; written description of project; revised opinions of
costs; and project phasing analysis. He remarked that these documents
have been reviewed by the Beach Renourtshment Maintenance Committee
with a favorable response.
Dr. Michael Stephen of Coastal Engineering provided a elkde pre-
sentation depicting the project. He remarked that the beach fill
limits where sand will be replaced have been refined based upon an
analysis of the measured erosion rates along the beach, the existing
beach width along the shoreline, sediment transport characteristics,
avoidance of environmentally sensitive areas, and an analysis of
historic shoreline changes along the Collier County coast.
Dr. Stephen explained that the project is divided into three pri-
mary segments: Vanderbilt Beach, Parkshere and Naples. He pointed
out that the Vanderbilt segment extends from the area north of the
Vanderbilt Inn at the Wiggins State Park limits, to the south approxi-
mately 2,000 feet below the Ritz Car/ton. He reported that the
Parkshere segment involves fill from DNR R-S0 south to the Miramar
public beach access. He revealed. that the Naples Beach segment begins
north of Lowdermilk Park and extends south to 18th Avenue South.
Page 18
April 12, 1994
Dr. Stephen called attention to the revised opinion of project
costs which reflects an estimated quantity of 1.3 million cubic yards
of sand fill; revegetatton ll.8 acres; 20 protective walkways
extending from the upland beach out and over the revegetated areas;
conetructton of the terminal groin at Doctors Pass; submerged struc-
tures and placing rock off-shore; renovation of the wood groins and
pile clueter groins; environmental budgeting for turbidity monitoring,
beach tilling, construction vibration controls, lighting and protec-
tion of the hard bottom during the construction interval, and restora-
tion of the extension of stormwater discharges on the beach plans. He
advised that the revised total opinion of cost is $14,893,000.
Dr. Stephen referred to the agenda packet and explained the
phasing of the various categories, time frame and dollars related spe-
cifically to the beach renourtehment project.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Dr. Stephen explained the
recommended proposed access points for mobilization, and noted that 25
access points were considered.
Co=~tesioner Saunders moved, seconded by Co~iesioner Volpe that
the proposal, as presented, be submitted to the appropriate agencies
in order to move forward with the project as outlined.
Mr. Huber advised that prior to submitting the plans for permits,
a contract needs to be entered into with Dr. Stephen for the next
phase of the project. He Indicated that the contract will be coming
to the Board for consideration on May l?, 1994.
Mr. BIll Neron spoke with regard to this Item.
U~on call for the queerton, the motion carried
~tel
~S1OR
Office of Capital Projects Management Director Conrecode recalled
that the MP0 Pathways Coordinator position was established in
November, 1992. He noted that'In the current fiscal year, the Board
Page
April 1~ 1994
authorized $~00,000 for pathway development and the MPO has further
prioritized $948,000 in the Starers ~ork program for pathway pro~ect~.
~r. Conrecode requested that the Commission revie~ and endorse the
Pathway Advisory Commtttee's (PAC) current work plan, as shown in the
agenda package; review funding alternatives and direct staff accor-
dingly.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Conrecode stated that
the approximate total coat for the 28 projects is between
million. He explained that this cost depende on the amount of right-
of-way that neede to be purchased, whether the pathway is provided as
a paved ehoulder, or whether there are separate bikeways, walkways and
roadway~ all within the public rights-of-way.
Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Chapman stated that the hulk of the
project list as complied, te the result of citizen requests. She
announced that some of the projects have been recommended by staff and
the PAC.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Chapman advised that
Vanderbilt Beach Road running west is not on the
Commissioner Volpe recalled that the Vineyards committed to build
a sidewalk from Logan Blvd. to the front of that development on
Vanderbilt Beach Road. He indicated that presently there te the
Elementary School and the Community Park in this area and suggested
that theee areas should be included on the list as a priority.
Ms. Chapman provided a list of the arterial and collector roads
requiring sidewalks on one or both sides of the road, in addition to
extettng bike lanes to complete the system.
Tape #3
Commissioner Volpe remarked that he concurs with the recommen-
dation of the PAC but also endorses the completion of the aidewalk to
the Vineyards Elementary School and the Community Park.
Mr. Conrecode asked that the Board endorse the Pathway Work
Program FY 94/95 in addition to direction on funding.
Co=~issioner $aunder~ ~oved0 seconded by Commissioner Volpe to
Page 20
approxm the last u presented, with the addition of co~plst/ng the
sidewalk along Vanderbilt Beach Road from Logan to the Vine~ard~
Elementary School.
The following persons spoke with regard to this item:
Bill Neron
Kim Kobza
Upon cal! for the question, the motion carried unantaously.
12go)
Xte~ ~8H3
AWJLRD OF THE ENTIR.E #ORK PACXAGE OF RIP #93-2059 TO AGROLX, BARBElt AND
BRUNDJ~GE, INC. iJ~D EXECUTION OF A DESXGI~ CONTRACT XN TR~ ANOUNT OF
8136,850 FOR THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES CONNURI'rY PARK - APPROVED
Office of Capital Projects Management Dtrcctor Conrecode reported
that this item was presented to the Board on March 22, 1994, with a
staff recommendation to award the entire contract for design, survey
services, landscape architecture and architecture associated with the
Golden Gate Estates Community Park. He recalled that the Commission
had a number of questions at that time regarding the manner by which
staff went through the process in determining whether this was an in-
house design or an outside design service.
Mr. Conrecode provided a memo, outlining the process that is
undertaken for every project. In addition, he noted that the memo
summarizes the projects that are currently being done on an In-house
basis.
In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Conrecode explained
that at the time of the immediate reorganization, his office was faced
with a number of project priorities on projects that should have been
accomplished several years ago. He pointed out that a number of the
solid waste projects had deadlines of January, 1994 and his office
became involved in detail with same'in November, 1993.
Commissioner Matthews remarked that she assumed that the bulk of
the work was to be done in-house.
Commissioner Volpe ~oved, seconded by Co=~ieeloner Norris and
carried 3/2 (Couieeloner Matthews and Co~iee/oner Constantine
Pa~ 2!
2994
oppoae.d), ~o a~ard ~he entire ~ork packag~ o~ RFP ~93-2059 ~o A~nolt,
Barber and Brundage, Inc. and that the ClxaArnan execute the Deeton
Contract for the Golden Gate Eatarea CouuaunA~ Park.
Page 22
April 12, 1994
(448)
Ztll #10A
COUNCIL OF LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS (F.S. 263.02) - COUNTY ATTORNEY TO
INVESTIGAT~ AND I~EPORT BACK
Commissioner Volpe presented a copy of a provision of F.S. 163.02,
relating to Councils of local public officials. He Indicated that it
appears that there may be an opportunity to coordinate the County's
efforts with those of the City, School Board and Lee County.
Commissioner Volpe explained that this provision allows for the
governing bodies of two or more bodies to actually designate the Chair
or a representative of the Board to serve on a local public official
council that will coordinate the efforts that are occurring either
within the county or hi-county Issues.
Commissioner Volpe suggested that County Attorney Cuyler review
whether there is an opportunity for the creation of this type of coun-
cil and discuss this issue in detail at the next Lee/Collier Joint
Meeting which is scheduled for May 5, 1994 or the next opportunity the
Chair has to meet with the School Board, or the next City/County
meeting.
The Commission concurred with Commissioner Volpe's suggestion that
County Attorney Cuyler investigate this Issue and report back.
a., Recess: 12:45 PM - Reconvened: 1:38 I'M At this time
Deputy Clerk Fernle¥ replaced Deputy Clerk Hoffman ess
(595)
Item #22Bl
ORDINANCE 94-23 RE PETITION NO. PUD-93-11 BILL HOOVER OF BUTLER
ENGINEERING, INC. REPRESENTING IMMOKALEE NON-PROFIT HOUSING, INC.,
REQUESTING A ZONING CHANGE FROM "A-MHO" TO "PUD," PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, KNOWN AS TIMBER RIDGE PUD, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF EDEN AVENUE AND CARSON ROAD, IMMOKALEE, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 10.1! ACRES - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
March 24, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication flied with
the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition PUD-93-11
regarding a zoning change for Timber Ridge PUD in immokalee.
Ron Ntno, Senior Project Planner, stated that the subject property
Page 23
April 12, 1994
is located in the urban area of ImmokaZee and substantial development
surrounds the 10.1 acre parcel. He explained that a single family
residence with a swimming pool exists on the property.
Mr. Nino stated that the Immokalee Area Master Plan recommends
six (6) dwelling units per acre and this development is proposed at
eight (8) dwelling units per acre with two (2) dwelling units attribu-
table to the Affordable Housing Agreements. He pointed out that 24 of
the 80 potential dwelling units will be single family, fronting on two
(2) of the perimeter streets, with the interior being developed with
either single or multiple family units with a not-to-exceed number of
80 units. Mr. Nino stated that the development standards within the
proposed PUD are comparable to development standards within the Land
Development Code.
Mr. Nino stated that sewer and water are available and the proxi-
mity of the property to central Immokalee allows reasonable access to
community infrastructure.
Mr. Ntno pointed out that the Collier County Planning Commission
unanimously recommended approval of this petition. He explained that
two (2) residents in the area voiced concerns regarding increased den-
sit¥ and traffic with a request to preserve the land as it presently
exists.
Mr. Nino stated that on Page l0 of the Timber Ridge Planned Unit
Development, Section III, Paragraphs 3.3.A and 3.3.B, underlining of
the titles Principal Uses and Accessory Uses, respectively, is
required. He explained that on Page 15, Item D.(1)(e), needs the
words "15 feet for single family structures" added. He indicated that
on Page 19, Item G, the word "plat" needs to be inserted.
Bill Hoover of Butler Engineering, representing Immokalee Non-
Profit Housing, Inc., stated that the petitioner Intends to develop 89
single family homes in Phase I and the preliminary subdivision plat
will be presented to the Collier County Planning Commission in
approximately three (3) weeks. He indicated that Phase II will be
developed as single family homes also unless unforeseen circumstances
Page 24
April 12, 1994
arise.
Commissioner Norris stated that two (2) options are outlined in
the materials presented and he is not comfortable with approving options
but would rather the applicant select the option to be approved.
Carl Kuehner, Development Director for Immokalee Non-Profit
Housing, Inc., stated that the maximum allowable units of 80 is being
requested when only 59 single family homes are planned for conatruc-
tion to enhance the receipt of State grants.
Commissioner Saunders stated that the agencies involved will know
precisely what will be built and funding will be based on the actual
planned number of units.
Mr. Kuehner stated that the application process for funds necessi-
tates the filing of actual planned construction and another portion
indicating the number of units the County supports which is utilized
for valuation of the maximum development potential of land.
Greg M~halic, Affordable Housing Director, stated that a density
bonus is not needed on this project to build the single family homes~
however, in order for the applicant to be eligible for the sale loan
program, the County must participate with a public contribution and
the only way is to gave a density bonus and allow it to be calculated
into the value of the property.
County Attorney Cuyler stated that a large number of PUD's are
built-out at a lower density than originally planned.
Mr. Mihalic stated that the positive aspects of this development
which is substantial ownership housing in Immokalee was the driving
force behind the advice to present the plan with two (2) options.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Kuehner replied that there
is really no Intention of using the multi-family option but it would
be on a rental basis. He explained that the amenities will be the
same whether Just single family homes are constructed or multi-family
units and consist of community rooms, poeslble day-care facility,
swimming pool, basketball court and tot lot.
Mr. Kuehner informed the Board that the project will be for very
Page 25
April 12, 1994
low income. He stated that Immokalee Non-Profit Housing, Inc. is the
developer of Sanders Pine which ~s a 40 unit, very low ~ncome, farm
working facility and ts located approximately two (2) blocks from the
proposed project.
Commissioner Matthews questioned if the Board can grant the den-
sity bonus for pu=poses of the applications but ~m~t the dwelling
units to be constructed? Mr. Cuyler responded ~n the negative.
Commissioner Volpe questioned ~f the Board can approve the
petition for the 80 s~ngle family homes and ~f the developer dec~des
to bu~d multi-family unite, they would be subject to the conditional
use application process?
Mr. Kuehner s~ated tha~ the stipulation for 80 s~ngle family homes
is acceptable.
Co~ss~oner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Coutes~oner MatthM a~od to a~r~ Petition P~-93-11 as pre-
sented. Seconded ~ Co,isotoner Sanders. U~n call for the
~est~on, the ~ot~on failed 2/3 {Co~ss~oners Vol~, Const~t~ne
Norris opposed).
In response ~o Co~ssioner Volpe, M=. Kuehner stated that
anything beyond s~ngle family homes and the accessory recreational and
amenity packages needed, Immokalee Non-Profit Housing, Inc.
submi~ a conditional use application.
Co~ss~oner Volpe move to approve Pet~on ~-93-~1 w~th the
permitted principal ~es restricted to single f~tly residences, child
care factlt~, recreattonal/m~a~ment/la~d~ fact11~, the existing
house, the three (3) accessory uses ~d Item C to be added ~der
Permitted that duplexes, ~o-f~tly ~d ~ltt-f~tly ~t~ct~e
~bJect to conditional use application. Seconded ~ Co~t~eloner
~tth~ ~d c~rled 4/1 (Co~tseloner Norris
Coatestoner Sanders moved, seconded ~ Co~tsstoner ~tth~ ~d
carried ~lmously, to approve the ~er-oc~pled Affordhie Ho~tng
Agree~nt ~d the Rental Affordable Housing Agreement ~d that the
Co~ty Attorney's 0fftce be authorized to ~e the a~roprtate
Page 26
April 12, 1994
(~22)
Itel #~2A~
ORDINANCE 94-22 AMENDINQ ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, PROVIDINQ
FOR AMeNDMENTS TO THE QROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN - ADOPTED WITH
STIPULATION
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
April 6, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the
Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Stan Litsinger, Growth Management Chief, stated that the first
public hearing was held in October, 1993 at which time the Board
of County Commissioners voted to transmit the recommended amendments
to the Department of Community Affairs (DCA). He explained that the
Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report was received on
January 27, 1994 and the Staff has made recommendations to alleviate
the DCA's concerns. Mr. Litsinger indicated that on March 17, 1994,
the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) held a second public
hearing to make recommendations to the Board on final adoption of the
1994 amendments and the Commission recommends that the amendments be
adopted with Staff's recommendations in response to the DCA's report.
Mr. Litsinger stated that only the objections and Staff's respon-
ses will be presented in the interest of time since the amendments
have previously been reviewed.
Mr. Litsinger pointed out that there is one objection relative to
the Capital Improvement Element which was a request that the County
strike out and underline all portions of the adopted amendments and
Staff has agreed to do so.
There were no objections voiced on this item.
Mr. Litsinger stated that the DCA raised no objection to the
Recreation Element and the amendment consists of a revision of the
adopted level of service from $122 ~o $168 for capital facilities
which can be supported by the current level of impact fees as reviewed
in October, 1993. He pointed out that the CCPC recommends that the
Board of County Commissioners adopt this amended level of service with
an annual construction cost.index adjustment.
Page 27
April 12, ~994
There were no objections voiced on this itel.
Diane Holling, Long Range Planner II, stated that on March
1994, the CCPC unanimously recommended to adopt Staff's recommen-
dations to the DCA report.
Ms. Holling explained that the level of service data, current
operating conditions for U.S. 41 from Airport Road to Rattlesnake
Hammock Road is shown as a Level of Service (LOS) D and has been
requested by the Florida Department of Transportation to be changed to
a LOS F. She indicated that Staff has complied with this request.
Ms. Holling stated that the DCA objected to several discrepancies
between the roadway improvement data in Table 5 and the project
details. She explained that the project lengths for CIE Projects 48,
49 and 45 were different from FDOT's project lengths and they have
been adjusted to correspond.
Ms. Holling pointed out that a comment in reference to TRA 1-44
was that the County is encouraged to coordinate development of the
Comprehensive Pathways Program Map in the Master Transit Map. She
stated that this does not refer to any previous amendments, however,
Staff will consider it in future amendment cycles.
Ms. Holling stated that in reference to TRA 1-19, Item 5, it is
recommended that the reference to the Florida Transportation Plan be
changed to more specific reference such as Florida Administrative Code
14-94. She pointed out that again this does not refer to any previous
amendments, however, Staff has made note of the request and effected
change in the traffic circulation element as recommended by DCA.
Ms. Holltng stated that an objection was voiced to interchange
location detail shown in map TRA 6AW, Traffic Circulation Map, because
year 2003 does not correspond with the detail depicted in the Collier
County 2010 plan. She explained that Staff did not place the proposed
interchange location at Golden Gate Parkway and 1-75 on the 2003 map
but it now been added.
There were no objections voiced on thil itel.
Ms. Holling stated that the Golden Gate Parkway and 1-75
Page 28
April 12, 1994
interchange will probably be completed anytime between 2000 and 2005.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Transportation Services
Administrator Archibald, replied that the $75,000 allocated for
completing the interchange study was reallocated when the analysis was
done for the five (§) year work plan and when priorities were set
based on the five cent ($.05) gas tax.
Ms. Holling stated that on March l?, 1994, the CCPC unanimously
recommended not to adopt the amendments to the Mass Transit Element in
response to the DCA Report. She explained the Mass Transit Element
was updated to ~nclude the results of the Transit Feasibility Study
adopted last year by the MPO. Ms. Holltng pointed out that language
was added to show that the MPO had studied transit and was not moving
forward to develop a Transit Development Plan but the DCA objected
that the County did not have a level of service plan set up for mass
transis or a financial plan as required by Rule 9J5. She explained
that DCA was contacted and informed that the County d~d not have the
data and would be a result of the Transit Development Plan and could
not be included in the amendments. Ms. Holling etated that the DCA
recommended that the County not amend the Mass Transit Element, there-
fore, Staff is recommending not to adopt.
There were no objections voiced on this item.
Barbara Cacchione, Long Range Planning Chief, stated that she will
be presenting public petitions and the first will be Petition CP-93-2
and is an amendment to Commercial under Criteria. She explained that
this amendment is to allow for properties that are infill commercial
to be considered for office and retail type uses. Ms. Cacchione indi-
cated that the DCA had concerns regarding the impacts on U.S. 41 East
and the level of service was stated at E and should be F, noting that
the Petitioner has completed an analysis indicating that traffic
impacts are minimal.
There were no objections voiced on this item.
Ms. Cacchtone stated that Petition CP-93-3 is Pelican Marsh and
DCA has concerns with making this a full activity center due to hurri-
Page 29
April 12, 1994
cans evaluation and impacts on roadways. She indicated that the
Petitioner has completed an analysis which shows that the impacts on
roadways are mitigated by proposed roadway Improvements.
Ms. Cacchtone stated that the DCA has concern with allowing this
type of development intensity without Vanderbilt Beach Road being
constructed. She indicated that language has been added to the affect
that although the project may go through rezontng on the westerly two
(2) quadrants of the activity center, no development can occur until
the roadway is constructed.
Commissioner Volpe questioned if the activity center at Airport
Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road is the same activity center in the
Petltlon?
Ms. Cacchione replied in the affirmative and explained that this
is a future activity center and the petition is to make it a full
activity center with no potential for development until the roadway on
the western two (2) quadrants, i.e. Vanderbilt Beach Road, is
constructed from U.S. 41 to Airport Road. She indicated that the
restriction has been in place that no development orders or rezonings
could be approved for commercial uses until the roadway is complete.
Ms. Cacchtone explained that this petition will allow rezontng
approvals and development on the northeastern and southeastern
quadrants, part of which are the Vineyards and Pelican Marsh.
Barbara Cawley of Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., repre-
senting the Petitioner Westinghouse Communities, stated that the
proposed amendment will allow Pelican Marsh to complete the
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and fezone. Ms. Cawley explained
that the language in the Growth Management Plan prohibits rezoning the
property and the petition will allow placement of a zoning district
over two (2) intersections but will also subject any commercial deve-
lopment placed on the northeasterly corner of Pelican Marsh to con-
currency. Ms. Cawley stated that the northwesterly corner cannot have
any development until Vanderbilt Beach Road is complete. She
explained that this will allow the Petitioner to plan the intersec-
Page 30
April 12, 1994
tiens as part of the DRI instead of planning It later and appl¥tng for
an amendment to the Development Order.
Commissioner Volpe stated that the Board is requested to approve
the change to accommodate the rezontng process for Pelican Marsh but
he is uncomfortable with the amendment.
Commissioner Constantine stated that he is uncomfortable with this
amendment and questioned what will happen if the Board does not
approve the amendment to the Growth Management Plan?
Ms. Cacchione responded that commercial or higher intensity uses
at the quadrants will not be allowable as part of the Pelican Marsh
DRI and the Petitioner will only be allowed three to four (3-4) units
per acre.
Ms. Cawley stated that a DRI has been submitted and all this
amendment does is allow for planning at the same time as planning for
the remaining portion of the project but nothing can be built until
the DRI is approved by the Board.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Cawley stated that the west
side of Airport Road is also planned for commercial use and will be
presented when the DRI is before the Board.
Commissioner Volpe questioned if the property on the west side is
being treated differently than the property on the east side?
Ms. Cawley replied in the affirmative because Vanderbilt Beach
Road has not been completed from Airport Road to U.S. 41 but not from
a planning prospective because all the information on both quadrants
is being supplied in the Pelican Marsh DRI.
Ms. Cacchtone stated that Staff is recommending approval of the
language as originally submitted which is to allow development to
occur in the eastern quadrants and limit development on the western
quadrants until Vanderbilt Beach Road is linked to U.S. 41. She indi-
cated that all quadrants can be treated equally for purposes of this
amendment and place a contingency on the completion of Vanderbilt
Beach Road.
Commissioner Matthews questioned that if the Board approves
Page 31
April 12, 1994
Staff's recommendation, will there be any possibility of being forced
to complete the Vanderbilt Beach Road project sooner than planned
because of the development7
Ms. Cacchione explained that when the Board approves developments
that rely on roads within the Capital Improvement Element, the Board
is committing to complete those roads.
Commissioner Matthews explained that the four laning of Vanderbilt
Beach Road is planned for in the distant future and she is concerned
about placing development pressures on Collier County to accelerating
the four laning project.
Ms. Cawley explained that when the DRI is presented for Board
approval, a list of road projects will be included which the developer
will have to assure are operating at adequate levels of service, and
Vanderbilt Beach Road will be a key part of the Pelican Marsh DRI
approval process. She explained that there are concurrency
constraints on the DRI.
'=' At this tile, the Board decided not to take action on this lte~
and to continus hearing proposed Growth Management Plan A~end~nts.'''
Michele Arnold, Long Range Planner, stated that the amendments
regarding Petitions CP-93-4 and SP-93-14 will allow for Business Park
District within the Industrially designated areas of the Future Land
Use Map and the Immokalee Master Plan.
Ms. Arnold explained that DCA's objections to this amendment
included concerns for lack of standards or guidelines establishing a
mixture of uses within industrial areas, the intent of the character
of the proposed district was not identified and compatibility of uses
was not addressed. She stated that language has been added to address
the concerns of the DCA.
Ms. Arnold stated that the Petitioner requested that a change be
made to the access controls which limited commercial uses from access
on exterior roadway, arterials or collectors and only allowed commer-
cial uses to service businesses within the business park. She
explained that language has been modified to eliminate the limitation
Page 32
April 12, 1994
and allow commercial use anywhere within the business park and the DCA
has no objection to the modification.
Ms. Arnold explained that the same language is recommended for the
Future Land Use Map and the Immokalee Master Plan.
There w~re no objections voiced on this item.
Ms. Catchtone stated that the next amendment addresses Petit/on
SP-93-5 regarding the transfer of development rights. She explained
that the DOA has concern about the level of Intensity by increasing
the use and the suitability of land and Increasing density in the
Coastal Management Area, the Category I Flood Zone.
Ms. Cacchione explained that the areas that are zoned for higher
Intensity are areas currently zoned RMF-6, RMF-12 and RMF-16 and Staff
felt that the increase tn most of those properties, which are already
platted, is minimal and represents not more than a ten to twenty
percent (10~-20~) Increase which will not significantly impact road-
ways or Impede hurricane evacuation.
Ms. Cacchtone stated that language was changed regarding the
Coastal Management Area because the DCA did not want density moved
from outside the area. She explained that language was added that any
density transfers that occur will stay within the Area, i.e. the
transfer of sensitive property in the Coastal Management Area to
Receiving Property must be completed within the Coastal Management
Area. She Indicated that any rezoning must be consistent with the
County density rating system.
There were no ob~ectione voiced on this itel.
Ms. Cacchtone etated that changes to the Future Land Use Map are
found on Page 198 and crew boundaries had to be adjusted because what
should appear as conservation area should only be area which Is
already purchased. She explained that the Natural Resources Map shows
the areas already purchased and areas proposed for purchase.
Ms. Cacchione stated that an 80 acre parcel in southern Golden
Gate Estates was designated as Agricultural/Rural but when the Golden
Gate Master Plan was prepared the area was designated Estates so the
Page 33
April 12, 1994
Future Land Use Map had to be adjusted to correct the scrivener's
error.
There were no objections voiced on this item.
Ms. Cacchione stated that the Golden Gate Master Plan needed to be
clarified because Parks and Essential Services were permitted in the
Estates Area and to add language clarifying that public facilities
placed in southern Golden Gate Estates will be analyzed to assure that
all policies in the Golden Gate Master Plan are complied with.
There were no objections voiced on this item.
Anthony PAres, Jr. spoke on the Growth Management Plan Amendments.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Litsinger explained that
the Capital Improvement Element of $68 million is in balance on a cash
flow, no debt basis.
Tape #4
At this point Petition 0P-93-S was again heard.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Cacchione stated that an
alternative is to treat the east side and the west side of Vanderbilt
Beach Road equally and that will allow Westinghouse Communities to
complete the planning process but will address the transportation net-
work issue.
Ms. Cawley stated that she contacted Westinghouse Communities and
they are in agreement to change the language to treat both sides of
Vanderbilt Beach Road equally, i.e. that no development wall occur on
either side until Vanderbilt Beach Road is complete.
Ms. Cacchione requested that Staff be given flexibility in
drafting the language to meet the intent.
There were no objections voiced on this item with the stipulation.
Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Co~issioner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe and
carried unanimously, that Ordinance 94-22 be adopted with the stipula-
tion regarding Pelican March and entered into Ordinance Book No. 65.
Item 912C1
ORDINANCE 94-24 AMENDING ORDINANCE 92-2S TO CORRECT A 8CltIVENER'$
ERROR PROVIDING FOR THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PARCELS FOR THE PROPERTY
Pa~ 34
April 12, 1994
REFERRED TO AS WILSON PROFESSIONAL CENTER PUD, A PROFESSIONAL CB~T~R
PUD, LOCATED ON THE S0~ST CORNER OF AIRPORT-PULLING ROAD AND
BAILEY LANE, IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
March 24, 1994, as evidenced by Aff~davit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Sam Saadeh, Project Planner, stated that a scrivener's error
constituting the maximum number of parcels in, the Wilson Professional
Center Planned Unit Development needs to be corrected.
Comm~ssioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Matthews moved, seconded by Commissioner $munders and
carried unanimously, that Ordinance 94-24 be adopted and entered ~nto
Ordinance Book No. 65.
(120)
Itel #12C2
RESOLUTION 94-2?6 RE PETITION AV 91-002, GERMAIN PROPERTIES, TO
VACATE, RENOUNCE AND DISCLAIM THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INTERESTS IN A SIXTY
FOOT (60'} ROAD RIGI~T-OF-WAY PLATTED AS EAST LANE AS RECORDED ON THE
PLAT OF SUNNY TRAIL HEIGHTS IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 43 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
March 27 and April 3, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication
filed with the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Russ Muller, Transportation Engineer I, stated that this Petition
is for the vacation of the 60 foot road right-of-way known as East
Lane on the Plat of Sunny Trail Heights. He ind~cated that the sub-
Ject property is located at the corner of U.S. 41 and Wiggins Pass
Road and the Germa~n car dealership is currently using the paved 262
foot road for employee parking. Mr. Muller pointed out that the adja-
cent property to the entire right-of-way is owned by the petitioner,
Getmain Properties of Columbus, Inc.
Mr. Muller stated that letters of No Objection have been received
from all pertinent utility companies, Project Plan Review Services,
North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District and the Sheriff's
Office.
Page 35
April 12, 1994
Mr. Muller pointed out that the public benefit will be reduced
maintenance cost for the road and dedication of a drainage easement to
accommodate the future widening of Wiggins Pass Road.
Ktm Kobza, agent for Germsin Properties of Columbus, Inc., stated
that the property was platted in 1957 and the road only provides
access to Germsin property. Mr. Kobza stated that the vacation w111
allow for a unified plan for the property, improve internal c/r-
culation and will help plan accesses to Wiggins Pass Road. He pointed
out that the negotiated terms of the drainage easement will provide
for water management for Wiggins Pass Road.
Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Comatse/onsr Saunders moved, seconded b~ Coa/seloner Volpe and
carr/ed unanimously, that Petition AV 91-002 be approved, thereby
adopt/ng Resolution 94-2?6.
Page 36
April 12, 1994
(283)
Ztem #I203
RESOLUTION 94-277 ESTABLISHING A SPEED LIMIT OF THIRTY (30) MILES PER
HOUR ON ALL PLATTED AND CONSTRUCTED ROADWAYS ~T~THZN TH~ BOUNDARIES OF
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES T~ZTH TH~ EXCEPTION OF EXISTING DESIGNATED
COLLECTOR ROADMAYS HAVING AN ESTABLISHED $FEED LIMIT OF FORTY FIVE
(45) MILES PER HOUR OR FIFTY FIVE (55) MILES PER HOUR - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
March 27, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Transportation Services Administrator Archibald stated that the
proposed resolution establishes a speed limit on the unimproved local
roads, improved local roads at 30 miles per hour, 45 miles per hour
for those collector roads north of Alligator Alley and south of
Immokalee Road, and maintains speed limits on roadways already signed
and marked. He pointed out that the resolution reconfirms existing
speed limits and establishes new speed //mits at 30 miles per hour
south of Alligator Alley in Golden Gate Estates.
Mr. Archibald stated that 110 new traffic signs will be required
and will be funded through the budget amendment approved under
Item #8B1.
Mr. Archibald explained that the Shertff's Office feels that
establishing speed limits in the rural port/on of Golden Gate Estates
will assist them in enforcing same.
Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Matthews moved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe and
carried unanimously, that Resolution 94-2?7 be adopted.
Fage 37
April 12~ 1994
~t:el #13A1 - #:J. thdrlLwn
(422)
2tel ~23A2
RESOLUTION 94-278 RE PETITION V-94-3, TERRANCK KgPPLK REQUESTING A TEN
FOOT (10') VARIANCE FROM TH~ REQUIRED 35 FOOT FRONT YARD TO 25 FEET
FOR THE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 721 109th AVENU~
NORTH, LOTS 20 AND 21, BLOCK 15, NAPLES PARK, UNIT 1 - ADOPTED ~TITH
STIPULATION
Legal notice havlng been published in the Naples Daily News on
March 27, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Wayne Arnold, Acting Site Development Review Director, stated that
this petition represents a variance request for the front, side and
rear yards at property located at 721 109th Avenue North, Naples Park.
Mr. Arnold explained that the applicant wishes to improve the
existing'duplex structure by adding a rear porch, front porch and a
detached garage. He pointed out that the applicant has two (2) non-
conforming lots of record which have been viewed by the County for
permitting purposes as a singular lot due to the construction over the
common lot line. He explained that the $taff'e application of the
Land Development Code and prior Zoning Code indicates that applicants
are not entitled to reduction in side yard setbacks where there exists
comb/ned lots of record.
Hr. Arnold stated that the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC) heard this petition on March 17, 1994 and unan/mously approved a
modified variance for the subject site which would authorize the
requested front yard variance only.
Mr. Arnold pointed out that a variance request for the rear yard
setbacks may not be necessary for the garage structure because of
missing clarification in the accessory use section of the Code which
states that single family homes are entitled to a ten foot (10') rear
yard setback for detached garages and then addresses multifamily but
not duplexes.
Terrance Kepple stated that he purchased the subject property one
and one-half (! 1/2) years ago and what he is requesting is up to
Page 38
April 12o 1994
interpretation of conflicting Codes. He pointed out that one question
is if his building ks a duplex or a two (2) family structure? Mr.
Kepple stated that the Land Development Code (LDC) defines a duplex as
a structure containing two (2) residences on a single lot of record
and defines a two (2) family as a residence on a single lot of record
attached at the property line with another single family residence.
He explained that the zoning requirements for the two (2) are dif-
ferent in a RMF-6 Zoning District, and the two (2) family requirement
is that each lot of record must be under separate ownership.
Mr. Kepple stated that the CCPC commented that the lot is noncon-
forming even when combined as one because it does not meet the minimum
square footage requirements for a lot of record in the zoning
district.
CommAssioner Volpe questioned why Mr. Kepple needs a variance?
Mr. Kepple replied that he does not feel he needs a variance but
he was not allowed to submit a building permit for the planned project
without one. He informed the Board that he has valid building permits
for adding a second story and the garage.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Kepple explained that at
some t~me in the future he may want to sell half the property and
structure which would meet the zoning code for a two family dwelling.
Commissioner Yelps polnted out that no land related hardship
exists.
Mr. Kepple stated that he wishes to accomplish three (3) things of
which one is adding a second floor and place the front in line with
the first floor. He explained that the existing structure is approxi-
mately one and one half feet (! 1/2') over the 35 foot front setback
line which requlres a variance for the wall to be vertical. Mr.
Kepple stated that he would also like to add a front porch for protec-
tion of the windows and front doors from the weather.
Mr. Arnold stated that one (1) letter was received voicing concern
with a two (2) story dwelling'which Mr. Kepple can legally complete
should he meet all requirements.
Page 39
Apr/! 12, 1994
Mr. Kepple explained that the only place he can construct the
garage is in the center of the lot and still meet zoning requirements
but he loses a large amount of area to pavement and the parage would
have to be parallel to the street.
Mr. Arnold informed the Board that the recommendation of the CCPC
was to approve only the front yard variance.
Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Com~ss~oner Saunders loved, seconded by Con~eeloner Norris and
carried unantlouel¥, that Petition V-9¢-$ be approved for a front yard
variance only, thereby adopttn~ Resolution 94-2?$.
000 P, 139
Pa~ 40
Ap~tl 12, 1994
(9o )
I~mm #13A3
RESOLUTION 94-279 RE PETITION V-94-2, RICliAI~) #. MORRIS, ARCHITECT,
REPT[ESENTINO FIRMON AND BETTY COOK, REQUESTING A TWENTY (20} FOOT
VARIANCE TO THE REAR YARD REQUIREMENT APPLICABLE TO LOT 5, BAYF~ONT
GARDENS SUBDIVISION IN LELY BAREFOOT BEACH - ADOPTED
Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on
March 27, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with
the Clerk, a public hearing was opened.
Ron Ntno, Senior Project Planner, stated that this petition is a
request to reduce the rear yard requirement of thirty (30) feet to ten
(10) feet for a lot which lies contiguous to Little Hickory Bay. He
indicated that the subject property is located in the Lely Barefoot
Beach PUD and the lot is different than other lots by virtue of its
configuration and lack of depth.
Mr. Nino explained that the Collier County Planning Commission
(CCPC) concluded that the lot configuration prohibits construction of
a home comparable with residences in the surrounding area and recom-
mended approval of the petition.
Mr. Nino stated that Mr. and Mrs. Eisenbud, the property owners of
a contiguous lot, objected to the petition and voiced concern for
removal of mangroves and the overall effect of crowding the waters
edge.
Richard W. Morris, Architect, representing Firmon and Betty Cook,
stated that he was asked to design a home on the subject lot but the
lot is too narrow to allow for yard setbacks. He pointed out that
with the required setbacks, only fourteen percent (14~) of the lot is
buildable area and one (1) factor is the drainage easement which runs
through the center of the property requiring the residence to be
constructed on the south half only. Mr. Morris stated that with
approval of the petition, twenty-seven percent (27%) of the property
will be buildable.
Mr. Morris explained that the mangroves are located along the
water line and they will not be disturbed.
Page 41
Apri! 12~ 1994
Larry Joiner spoke on thte item.
Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing.
Co~uaisetoner Matthews moved, eeconded by Co~missioner Saunders and
carried unanimously, that Petition V-94-2 be approved, thereby adopting
Resolution 94-279.
Page 42
April 12, 1994
(1303)
Ztem
RESOLUTION 94-280 RE PETITION CU-92-17, DR. NENO J. SPA~NA OF FLORIDA
URBAN INSTITUTE, INC., REPRESENTING FIRST HAITIAN BAPTIST M~iSSION,
INC., REQUESTING EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A CHURCH AND
ACCESSORY USES TO A CHURCH FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
THE TAMIAMI TRIAL (U.S. 41) APPROXIMATELY ONE IIALF (1/2) MILE SOUTH OF
THE IMPERIAL WILDERNESS R.V. RESORT CONSISTING OF 4.59± ACRES -
ADOPTED
Wayne Arnold, Acting Site Development Review Director, stated that
this is the first of three available conditional use extension
request. He pointed out that the petition was approved approximately
one (1) year ago but construction has not commenced to date.
Mr. Arnold stated that the applicant Is proceeding with develop-
ment of this parcel as an engineer and architect have been retained
and are moving forward with the site development plan review process.
Commissioner Constantine c~osed the public hearing.
Coatesloner Volpe moved, seconded by Commissioner Norris and
carried unani~ousl¥, that Petition CU-92-17 be g~anted ~n extension,
thereby adopting Resolution 94-280.
Pag~e 43
April 12, 1994
Item ~I&A
RE$CHEDULE GOLDEN GATE TOWNHALL MEETING - M&Y 29, 1994 AT 7:30 PM
APPROVED BY CONSENSUS
Administrative Assistant to the Board Ftlson stated that the
Golden Gate Townhall Meeting is rescheduled for May 19, 1994 at
?:30 PM.
It was the consensus of the Board to reschedule the Golden Gate
ToWn2Aall MeetAng for May 19, 1994 at ?:30 FM.
L&.WD DEV~O~ CODE ErJ'gNIRG MEETIRGS - ~Y &t~~Y 18, 1994 &~
Administrative Assistant to the Board F/lson stated that two (2)
evening Land Development Code public hearings are scheduled for
5:05 PM on Wednesday, May 4th and Wednesday, May 18th, 1994.
It was the consensus of the Board to schedule the Land Development
Code public hearings for Wednesday, May 4th and Wednesday, May 18,
1994 at 5:05
''' Recess: 3:30 P.M. - Reconvene: 3:40 P.M. At which time
Deputy Clerk Barbirettt replaced Deputy Clerk Fernley
Item #8H4
PReSeNTATIONS ~ SELECTION OF FINANCIAL ADVISORY FIRM - RAYMOND 3AM~$
& ASSOCIATES, INC. SELECTED
William Hargett, Assistant County Manager, stated that this item
is a follow up of the March 22, 1994 meeting when the Board approved
the short list of three firms from nine proposals received from fina-
ncial advisors. He requested that the Board hear presentations from
the three firms, rank them in order of preference and direct Staff to
enter into contract negotiations with the top ranked firm.
Jim Gollahon, Vice President/Manager of Public Finance of A.G.
Edwards & Sons, Inc., provided a presentation booklet to the Board.
(Copy not provided to Clerk's Office).
He stated that he is An charge of overall management of the project
000 , 156
Page 44
April 12~ 1994
and Mike Kuhn will serve as a contact for Collier County.
Mr. Gollahon gave a brief history of the firm and stated that the
company is financially stable. He said that the company has 45 offi-
ces in the State and two offices in Collier County.
Mike Kuhn stated that page 4 of the presentation booklet high-
lights the services that wall be provided. He said that has firm will
review the five year capital improvement program, develop a comprehen-
sive financing plan, analyze funding sources and bond capacity. He
said that A.G. Edwards, Inc. considers itself a national farm.
Mr. Kuhn provided the Board with a quarterly report prepared by
the farm and described the information contained within.
Mr. Kuhn announced that A.G. Edwards proposed a very fair and
competitive fee and if chosen wall be happy to negotiate further. He
proposed a flat fee of $10,000.00 plus .2§¢ per $1,000.00 of debt
issued to be capped at $25,000.00 per issue, out of pocket expenses
will be capped at $2,000.00 and an hourly basis of $125.O0 per hour
for any other general financial planning requested. He reiterated
that the fees may be negotiated.
Mr. Kuhn concluded that A.G. Edwards, Inc. has skilled pro-
fessionals with extensive financial experience. Be stated that the
firm has a commitment to the community and an understanding of
Florida and National markets. He stated that the firms' approach wall
be an involved proactive way in dealing with the County.
In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Kuhn stated that tf chosen
as financial advisor, A.G. Edwards would be precluded from taking down
part of the bond issue. He explained that this would enable the firm
to retain its' impartiality.
In answer to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Gollahon stated that in
the past he has dealt with Putnam, Hamilton, Santa Rosa and Leon
Counties as Financial Advisor.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Kuhn replied that the out
of pocket expenses would not include printing costs of a bond issue.
He stated that out of pocket expenses would include faxes, telephone
Page 45
April 12, 1994
calls, travel and meals.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Kuhn confirmed that the
hourly rate would apply to members listed as the financial team.
Marc Samet, representing Raymond James & Associates, Inc., pro-
vided the Board with a presentation booklet. (Copy not provided to
the ClerkWs Office.)
Mr. Samet announced that Raymond James & Associates, Inc. con-
tinues to be committed to financial advisory work and to Collier
County.
Mr. Samet stated that the two objectives of the original
engagement were threefold, the first was to develop and establish
underlying credit ratings for the County. He said that the second
objective had to do with the review of the five year capital improve-
ment plan for ths Growth Management Element and the annual update and
inventory report. He remarked that the third objective was to
strengthen the finance committee's working relationship with the Board
relative to future financing.
Mr. Samet reviewed the firms accomplishments. He stated that duel
track rating was implemented.
Mr. Samet revealed that recent increases in the interest rate have
delayed the proposed competitive sale of the County's Series 86 Park
and Recreation MSTU general obligation bonds.
Mr. Samet stated that as financial advisor, the firms' role is to
strive to identify and recommend those financings which give the maxi-
mum flexibility in the future.
Commissioner Volpe commented that Raymond James a Associates, Inc.
has done an excellent Job as financial advisor.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Samet stated that his
firms' compensation package was submitted as part of the proposal. He
said that issue sizes of $10 million or less are proposed to be
$7,500.00, issue sizes over $15 million will be negotiated, hourly
basis will be $110.00.
In response to Commissioner'Saunders, Mr. Samet confirmed that
Page 46
April 12, 1994
.25¢ per 1,000 per amount on a $1 million dollar issue is $2,500.00.
Mr. Samet reported that there are three refundings in placer the
road improvement issue from 1986, the Series 86 Park and Recreation
MSTU Bond Issue, and the Series 86 Capital Improvement Bond Issue.
Mr. Samet concluded by stattng that the staff of Raymond James &
Associates, Inc. will continue in their dedication to working with
Collier County.
In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Samet confirmed that a
fee of $7,500.00 for a $10 million issue and that a fee on issue sizes
over $15 million would be negotiated with the Board.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Samet explained that out of
pocket expenses have always been at cost and a receipt for any cost
over $75.00 must be approved by the Finance Director's office.
Kevin Hale, President of SunTrust, stated that the commitment of
SunTrust to the County is clear and one that cannot be equaled by
local or national competitors. He said that his firm is the only
local organization with a track record of financial advisory
expertise, community, financial, volunteer support, and Investment
banking experience.
Jerry Ford, Vice President of SunTrust, provided the Board with a
presentation booklet. He stated that SunTrust is one of the top
financial advisory boards in the Southeast.
Mr. Ford explained that he would be the Project Manager and has
been with SunTrust for 10 years. He said that he has been the finan-
cial advisor to Collier County schools for the past five years and Is
presently the financial advisor to Broward County for their water
wellfield program, Shertff's Department, Parks and Libraries.
Tape #~
Mr. Ford reviewed the qualifications of the SunTrust Public
Finance.
Mr. Ford stated the his firm has outstanding technical support,
including a state of the art computer system that has the most
advanced bond software available.
Page 47
April 12, 1994
Mr. Ford stated that if there Is a structure that has been
employed in the State, chances are that SunTrust has been involved in
some capacity.
Mr. Ford revealed that his firm has a strong capability working
with rating agencies and bond Insurance companies. He said that one
of the on1¥ AA-1 credits in the southeast is Gwtnnet County, Georgia.
He stated that Gwtnnet County School District is a client of SunTrust.
Mr. Ford reported that his firm recently helped Broward County
upgrade their rating standard from AA Minus to AA.
Mr. Ford briefly reviewed Collier County's Outstanding Debt
Service.
Mr. Ford concluded that SunTrust has a good understanding of where
Collier County has been and the direction the County needs to take.
In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Ford explained that the
fee schedule for General Obligation Bonds on issues of $§0 million or
less; $5 million and under would be $1.00 per bond. He presented a
fee schedule to the Board for their review.
In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Ford replied that SunTrust
is headquartered in Orlando.
Commissioner Volpe remarked that SunBank currently has the
County's line of credit. He asked if the fact that the County does
some banking with SunBank has any implication in this discussion?
Mr. Ford replied that it does not.
Assistant County Attorney Weigel agreed that there is no conflict.
In response to Commissioner Constanttne's question regarding the
flexibility of the fee schedule, Mr. Ford replied that SunTrust wants
to be Collier County's financial advisor. He said SunTrust is willing
to work out any arrangement that can be mutually agreed upon.
At the conclusion of the presentations, the Board of County
Commissioners ranked the three firms using the forms provided by Mr.
Hatgert.
Commissioner Constantine announced that the taknllation of the
ranking resulted in Raymond James & Associates, Inc. being awarded as
the Financial Advisory Firm for Collier CountF.
Page 48
April 12, 1994
**' Comatsstoner Norris moved, seconded b~ Cm~estone~ Matthews and
carried unanimously, that the following Items ~der the co~ent a~n~
be appro~d ~d/or adopted: '''
Item ,16A1
RESOLUTION 94-234 RE FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER
AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF "LAKESIDE OF NAPLES'
Item #16A2A
See Page , /~
RESOLUTION 94-235 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30306-06?,
OWRER OF RECORD - MARIETA ALONZO
Item
See Pages
l~ESOLUTION 94-236 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30305-0?0,
OWNEll OF RECORD - KATRINA M. ANDERSON
see Pages
Item #16A2C
RESOLUTION 94-23? PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30306-048,
OWNER OF RECORD - PHILLIP A. ARENA AND PATRICIA D. ARENA
See Pages,., /77- /~
Item ~16A2D
RESOLUTION 94-236 PROVIDIRG FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
&BATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIARCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30629-100,
OWNER OF RECORD - HELEN BORGLUM
See Pages
i 7cZ-/?O
Itgm ~16A2E
RESOLUTION 94-239 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABAT~I~ENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30305-064,
OWNER OF RECORD - JOSE VINCENT
See Pages . /_/:j2'/__ /~
Item ,16A2F
RESOLUTION 94-240 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF TH~
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30402-054,
ONNER OF RECORD - MARY JOHNSON
Itsm ~16A2G
Page 49
Apr1! 12, 1994
RESOLUTION 94-241 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSlaNT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATENENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COI~'LIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30305-053,
ONNER OF RECORD - MERCY NAQU~RIRA
Item #ISAIH
RESOLUTION 94-242 PROVIDING FOR ASSES~ OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF TH~
ABAT~iENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30630-011,
OWNER 0F RECORD - NIVARDO HARTINEZ AND ELBA HARTIREZ
/fT- /??
Item
RESOLUTION 94-243 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT 0F LIEN FOR THE COST 0F THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30308-070,
OWNER OF RECORD - GARY ROOKSTOOL, ELEANOR PORRAS
Item ,16A2J
See Pages
RESOLUTION 94-244 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIE~ FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30?0?-022,
OWNER OF RECORD - MIGUEL SALAZER AND IDANIA SALAZER
Item #16AIK
RESOLUTION 94-245 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 21105-130,
OWNER OF RECORD - ELLIOT B. SIEGEL AND NAN W. SIEGEL
Item #16A2L
RESOLUTION 94-246 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30707-016,
OWNER OF RECORD - MAURICE R. SEIFFEY AND KAREN SKIFFEY
Item ~16A2M
RESOLUTION 94-24? PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATeMeNT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30?0?-035,
OWNER OF RECORD - MERCEDES F. VEIGA
See Pages
l??-Iq
Item ;16A2N
RESOLUTION 94-248 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30?02-028,
OWNER OF RECORD - NOEL M. WILLIAMS
Page 50
Item ,16A20
April 12, 1994
RESOLUTION 94-249 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMIaqT OF LIEIV FOR TH~ COST OF THE
JLBAT~MENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30426-103,
OWNER OF RECORD - ROBERT D. BAUMAN, ET UX
See Pages o/- 0
Item #16AIP
RESOLUTION 94-250 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSM~T~ OF ~Z~ ~R ~ COS~ O~ ~
~~ OF A ~LIC ~I$~CE CO~LI~CE S~ICE$ C~E NO. 30324-026,
~R OF ~C0~ - SOPHIE B. BRO~, ET VIR
RESOLUTION 94-251 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TI~ COST OF T~E
AB&~ OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30408-069,
OWNER OF RECORD - ALPHONSO CAMPBELL
SeePages
Item ~16&IR
RESOLUTION 94-252 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE S~VICES CASE NO. 30330-165,
OI~R OF RECORD - ELIZABETH CHAMBERS
Item #16A2S
RESOLUTION 94-253 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSHENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30326-038,
OWNER OF RECORD - DAVID &. ELDRIDGE
Item #16A2T
SeePages
RESOLUTION 94-254 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSHENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABAT~i~[T OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30426-120,
OWNER OF RECORD - GUISEPPE FALIVENE
See Pages c:~·c~ - ~/ 3
Ite~ ~/SAIO
RESOLUTION 94-255 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A P~LIC ~IS~CE C0~1~ S~CES C~K NO. 30330-059,
~ 0F ~CO~ - H N H ~S
See Pages
A~11 12~ 1994
R~SOLDTION 94-2~6 PROVID~NG FOR ASSESSMlq~T OF LIKN FOR ~ COST O~ THg
A~I~T~NT 0~ A PU13LI¢ N~ISAN¢~ COMI~IANCE SEA~'~CES C&S~ NO, 30326-039,
~ 0~ I~CORD - ~. J. AN~ S~ILA ~. ~LMqTON
Item #16A2W
RESOLUTION 94-257 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30426-119,
OWNER OF RECORD - JULIANNA C. KASELITZ
Item ,16A2X
RESOLUTION 94-258 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST 0r THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30326-056,
OWNER OF RECORD - MRS. D. R. KOSMINKR
See Pages ~f9' c~o~/
Item #ISA2Y
RESOLUTION 94-259 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABA~ OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30331-029,
OWNER OF R~CORD - ALBERT AND MARGARET LEE
Item
See Pages
RESOLUTION 94-260 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30326-088,
OWNER OF RECORD - ROBERT NAVY
Item ,16A2&A
RESOLUTION 94-261 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30330-0T5,
OWNER OF RECORD - THELMA D. PENROD
SeePages J~/~- ~m7
Item #16A2BB
RESOLUTION 94-262 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30330-041,
OWNER OF RECORD - SARA ROBERTS-SHARP
SeePages.,
Item #16A2CC
RESOLUTION 94-263 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SKKVICES CASE NO. 30329-042,
OWNER OF RECORD - JOSE M. AND YVETTE L. SACO
Page 52
Item ~16A2DD
1994
RESOLUTION 94-264 I'~0VIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR T~E COST OF THE
ABATEMENT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30428-029,
OWNER OF R~CORD - O. L. $NYD~I~, NT UX
Item #16A3
I~$0LUTION 94-265 lie KESUBDIVI$ION OF LOT 16, A PORTION OF A
PREVIOU$LY RECORDED PLAT KNOWN AS SOUTHWIND ESTATES
See Pages
RESOLUTION 94-266 RE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OF LOT 16, BLOCK F, AND
LOT 11, BLOCK H, A PORTION OF A PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT KNOWN AS
REPLAT 0FUNIT 3, LITTLE HICKOR"/ SHORES
Item ~16A5
RESOLUTION 94-2~? l~E RESU~DIVI$ION OF TRACT 42, A PORTION OF A
FREVIOUSL¥ RECORDED PLAT KNOWN AS GOLDEN GATE E~TATE$, UNIT NO. 31
Item 916A6
RESOLUTION 94-268 RE RESUBDIVISION OF T/~ACT 10, A PORTION OF A
PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT KNOWN AS GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO.
1T
See Pages. m~,- ad~
Item #Z6A?
RESOLUTION 94-269 RE RESUBDIVI$ION OF TRACT 11, A PORTION OF A
PREVIOUSLY RECORDED PLAT KNOWN AS GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO.
49
RESOLUTION 94-270 ~ESUBDM$ION OF TRACT 3, A PORTION OF A PRE~IOUSnY
~CORDED PLAT KNOWN AS GOLDEN GATES ESTATES, ~1IT NO. 6
Item ,16C1 - Moved to Item
Item #16C2
AGT~EMENTWITH DCA FOR BLOCK GRANTFUNDING B~NEFITTZNGTHE PUBLIC
HEALT~ U~IT~S OBSTETRIC PROGI~LM - IN THE AMOUNT OF $T,066.00
Pa~e 53
&~i! ~2, ~994
Item ~16C3
'KESOLUTION 94-271 P~E API~0VAL OF APPOINTMENTS OF 0FFZCERS ~0 COLLIE~
COUNTY AGRICULTURE FAIR AND EXPOSITION, INC. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
See Pages
Item #16D1 - Withdrawn
Item #16E1
AI'I'ROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH SUNHEALTH CARE PLAN~ OF FLORIDA FOR NANAGED
HEALTH CARE SERVICES
See Pages ~6~/" ~ (~/
Itel ~16H! - Deleted
Item
· ~OV~ 0F B~ET
Item ,16H3
API~ROVAL OF WOlfE ORDER CEC-i$ FOR COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS TO
PERFOKM THE ANNUAL MONITORING SU~VEYAT WIGGINS PASS - IN THE AMOUNT
OF $16,110.00
See Pages
ItIm ,16H4 - Continued to ~eeting of &/19/9¢
Item ,16R5 - Continued to meetin~ of 4/19/94
Item ,1611
RESOLUTION 94-2?2 APPOINTING EDGARDO TE~IRO, JACK G. M~A, C. JAY
~ ~ DAVID S. WILKISON TO
COSINE
MISCELT2tNEOUS CORRESPONDENCE - FILED AND/ORREFEKRED
!
The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and or
referredas presented by the Board of County Commiss~oners.
,oo, I]00
Page 54
April 12, I994
It~#1631
GAIN TIME FOR INMATE N0. 58296, 80781, 75385, 31871
Item #1632
SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SEKVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFERDE~
'Item #16K1
BCC TO SERVE AS THE LOCAL COORDINATING UNIT OF GOVERNMENT Ill THE STATE
OF FLORIDA'S DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS' ANTI-DRUG ABUSE ACT
FORMOLA GRANT PROGP~M
:jrItlm ~16LI
EXEC~TION OF A PARTIAL SATISFACTIONOF LIEN FOR A LIEN FILED AGAIII~T
KENT DEVELOPMENT, INC., THEREBY REMOVING PROPERTY OWNED BY ~I!kT~E~
DUXBIIRYF~OMTHE LIEN
See Page.,
There being no further business for the Good of the County, the
meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 4:55 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX
OFFICIO ~D%~&'~"~ING BOARD(S) OF
SPBCI~DISTRZOTS UNDER ITS
Or as corrected
Page