Loading...
BCC Minutes 05/03/1994 RNaples, Florida, May 3, 1994 DET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners In and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in R~GULAR SESSION In Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Timothy J. Constantine VICE-CHAIRMAN: Betrye J. Matthews John C. Norris (Absent) Michael J. Volpe Burr L. Saunders ALSO PRESENT: Sue Barbtrettt and Ellis Hoffman, Deputy Clerks; Dwight Brock, Clerk of Court; Jim Hitchell, Internal Auditor; Nell Dorrill, County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; David Welgel, Assistant County Attorney; Tom Conracode, Office of Capital Projects Management Director; Dick Clark, Acting Couuntty Development Services Administrator; Tom Olltff, Public Services Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Mike Smykowskt, Acting Budget Director; Leo Ochs, Administrative Services Administrator; Greg Mthaltc, Affordable Housing Director; Vlad Ryztw, Engineer Project Manager; Jeff Walker, Risk Management Director; Deena Quinn, Real Property Supervisor; Deputy Hernandez-White, Shertff's Office and Sue Ftlson, Administrative Assistant to the Board. Page I Hay 3, 1994 ee~ee Co.~leetoner Volpe absent es reflected b~ 4/0 vote Tlpl (147) &G~IFD& -APPROVKDMZTH CHANGES Comm/aaloner lotrio moved, oeconded by Contaatonar Ssundara and caFr/ed 4/0, to a~r~e the agen~ with ~he c~ge. ~ ~a~led ~ ~ ~ ~ S~t, ~d the rallying addttlo~l &~ Item ~15A - Dates fo~ ~t~e Item Bu~et Reuter. Page 2 CO~K)I~Ji~3~DJk - APPROVED AJED/OR&DOPT~D May 3, Z994 The motion for approval of the consent agenda is noted under Item #16. I~XHUT~S OF ~ R~GULJLR MEETING OF APRIL 12, 1994, REGULAR M~ETXNG OF APRIL 19, 1994 Jt~D ffORKLHOP ~ET/RG O~ ~XL 20, 1994 - ~O~D Commissioner S&undera moved, macondad by Com~tastoner ~atth~a and cm~rlmd 4/0, to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 12, 1994, !tlgull~ Meeting of April 19, 1994 and #ork~hop Meeting of Apz'il 20, 1994. (lee) Xtem~4A ~ S~r/CZ A#&RDS - PRgS~D Commissioner Constantine congratulated the following employee for service with Collier County Government: David Giger - 15 Years, Road and Bridge - Presented Sharon G. Cornellson - 5 Years, OCPM - Not Presented (101) Xtel#4B1 PROCLJiJ~YXON DE~XG~&TXRG TUESDAY, KAY 10, 1994, J~q HE&L/qIY NOT~R~ DAY Upon reading the proclamation, Comliaaloner Matthe~ ~oved, eicondad by Co-~tmsioner Horria and carried 4/0, that the Procl~at/on dmmignmtIng Tuamdmy, May 10, 1994, am Healthy Mothera Day be adopted. Stephan/e Vick accepted the Proclamation. Page 3 May 3, 1994 (29?) Xte~ ~4~2 DZ3ZGNATZIG T]~ WEEK O, HAY 2-7, 1994, A.I HARCH OF DZHES ADOPTED Upon reading the proclamation, Col~llaloner Norrll ~oved, leconded by Coll~lllontr S~underl ~nd carrl~ 4/0, t~t the Procl~tton Minting ~ Mk of ~y 2-?, ~994 i~ ~rch of DJ~I 'Nilk ~uss Nuller, Teas Captain, described the activities planned flor ~alk A~erlca ~eek and accepted the Proclamation. Page 4 ~TZOI DI~ZGIIATXJI'G MAY 2-T, IE~ZK - ADOPTI:D Hay 3, 1994 1994 AS rAM DAY U.S.A., 1994 JUED ~ Upon reading the proclamation, Co~atesloner Saundsrs · ~co~d b~ Co~alsstonsr ~tth~ md carried 4/0, that the ~lmtl~ ~ll~tlng ~y 2-?, 1994 ~k ~ ~t~. Sh~on ~ttcomb Anderson and John Cardtllo accepted the Proclarion. Page Nay 3, 1994 Xte~ F]tOCL~TXON DUX~TXNG TI~ ~EE]~ OF I~tY 1-?, 1994 ~ BI KIND TO Upon reading the proclamation, Coulealonar Con~t~ntine ~oved, ~eco~ded b~ ~le~io~r ~tth~ ~d c~rl~ 4/0, t~t the ~lmti~ ~ol~ting ~y 1-7, 1994 a~ ~ KI~ To ~1~18 ~k ~ ~1olo 3.cob accept~ t~ Proclmtlon. Page 6 I~ay 3, 1004 (ess) ~ ~ 94-326, 94-356, 1~4 94-358 - ADO~D Acting Budget Director Mike Smykowskt requested adoption of the three routine Budget Amendments as shown in the Executive Summary. Co~1811one~ Norris moved, seconded by Co,rmtssloner Mmtthew~ and oartied 4/0, that Budget kuen~Luents 94-326, 94-356 &rid 94-358 be e opted. Item ~7A R~UEST FOR CO%OJUNITY PLAYGROUND AT PINECR~ST KLKMKNTARY SCHOOL - BTAFP TO DEVELOP XIITKRIJ:K~AL A03t~KM~NT MITH SCHOOL BOARD FOR MAI~ITKIAIICI, COUNTY TO FUND $10,000.00 AND WILL MATCH CITIZEN ¢OFFRIBOTIOIFS ~P TO $8,000.00 St. 3udy Dohner, Director, Guadalupe Center, stated that in December, 1993., Ms. Trtsh Leonard of McDonald's Restaurants, asked if the Guadalupe Center would be Interested in a Community Park? She explained that there t8 a possibility that resources could be obtained through the Ronald McDonald Childtens Charities. She 8aid that it was decided that the Church'a property was not the safest place for a playground. St. Dohner stated that there is a great need for a playground in South Immokales. She explained that by building a playground designed by the children and built by their parents, three things will be accomplished; fostering community cooperation0 providing a peace making activity and a sense of ownership and accomplishment. St. Dohner stated that she was informed that Pinecrest School was entering into an expansion project. She reported that a committee was formed to study the feasibility of locating the playground there and everyone agreed to the concept. St. Dohner reported that the committee approached the Collier County School Board and they approved the playground on school pro- perty contingent upon the County supplying the maintenance. She said Page 7 ~ay 3. ~994 that an Interlocal Agreement was suggested where the School Board would provide the property and the County would be credited with a Park and agree to the long term maintenance. St. Dohner announced that Robert S. Leathers and Associates will provide technical assistance at a fee ranging from $8,000.00 to $24,000o00 depending on the size of the playground. St. Dohner stated that the estimated cost of the playground is 845,000o00. She said that she has applied for a grant to Ronald NcDonald Childtens Charities for $30,000.00, but the Florida Ronald NcDonald Childtens Charities has a commitment to building a Ronald NcDonald House in Southwest Florida, therefore they granted 85,000.00. She said that they submitted the proposal to the National Ronald NcDonald Childtens Charities for further funding but they will not be able to respond until October, 1994. St. Dohner stated that the estimated cost for technical assistance is $10,000.00, which includes design, liability coverage, fund raising, organization of construction and supervision of the construc- tion. She explained that the specially treated wood will cost approximately $20,000.00, and approximately $15,000.00 is estimated for permitting, supplies and fees. St. Dohner revealed that Ronald McDonald Charities has committed $5,000.00, the Immokalee Horse Trials has committed to $5,000.00 and the Collier County School Board agreed to fund $5,000,00. St. Dohner explained that the citizens of Immokales have many funding raising projects planned. Sr. Dohner requested that Collier County match the $~,000.00 donated by the School Board. St. Dohner explained that construction of the playground Is planned for the Spring of 1995. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Olltff replied that the playground would provide credit as a Park requirement of the Growth Management Plan as long as it Is a public facility. In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Public Services Administrator ,oo, [00,,,.: 19 Page 8 ~ay 3, 1994 ellill replied that It would cost the County $45,000.00 plus the cost of land If the County were to develop a statler park facility. In response to Commissioner Matthews, St. Dohner replied that she Is unsure if the playground could be included in the sununer parks program because no restroom facilities are planned at this time. Commutesloner N~tthe~ ~oved, to h~vm the item brought b~ck before the Board ~ld Staff be directed to enter Into an Interlocal Agr~nt with tbe Collier County School Board for the ~alntanance of the faci- lity, ~nd that Collier County supply $100000.00 for the project and mtch citizen contributions up to $5,000.00. Seconded by Co-~leaioner Commissioner Constantine Indicated that he would support the motion. He asked where the funds will be obtained. Public $ervtces Administrator Olltff replied that there are no budgeted funds for this project, however, the 30? Parks Capital budget could be investigated for possible funds. In response to Coemtssloner Constantine° Mr. Olllff confirmed that this Item will be brought back before the Board. County Manager Derrill stated that a Budget Amendment and an Interlocal Agreement would have to be approved by the Board. Public Services Administrator Olltff pointed out that wooden playground eclutpment has historically proven to be unsatisfactory in Florida. He requested that the Interlocal Agreesent be written In such a way that the County Is protected liability-wise on a long term basis. Upon cmll for the question, the motion carried 4/0. OTTO ~3tZ~'I~'R~ D~I3tRAL OF ZMPACT FEES - DENZKD Otto Iristen stated that he had purchased property in Collier County last year. He explained that he spent a great deal of time in Development Services gathering Information on building codes while applying for a building permit. He Indicated that no one ever men- Page 9 May 3, 1994 ticned lapact fees. Mr. Iristen requested that the Board allow him to pay the Impact fee on a monthly basis. In response to Commissioner Hatthews, Mr. Krtsten replied that he began the application process for his Green Card approximately two months ago. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Greg Mthaltc, Housing and Urban Improvement Director, replied that the County derefta1 program is for homesteaded property and the property owner must be a natura- lized, permanent resident. Coemlsstoner Saunders remarked that the memo from Mr. Mthaltc pre- sents a more serious issue regarding the fact that the home has been constructed without building permits. Dick Clark, Acting Community Development Administrator, confirmed that the appropriate permits were not pulled and serious code viola- tions exist. He said that In order to bring the building up to code, sections can be rebuilt. In response to Commissioner Saunders, County Attorney Cuyler stated that the County Is required to evaluate the structure to deter- mine If an after-the-fact permit can be obtained and if they finish the Inspections and determine that the structure cannot be corrected to cods, the County's alternative could be to order that the structure be removed. Commissioner Saunders explained to Mr. Krtsten, that the Board is required by Ordinance to react when a structure Is not built to code. Mr. Krtsten stated that he is not concerned about the structure, he is willing to disassemble the structure If required. He requested that the Board give him the opportunity to defer the Impact fees. Commissioner Constantine remarked that Mr. Mthallc has confirmed that the petitioner does not qualify for the deferral program. He said that the request must be dented. It ~ th~ consensus of the Board to direct Staff to evaluate the cod~ vlolatlon~ and deter]line whether the structure should be Page 10 dl~~l~d, ~ to direct the County ltton¥ to e~e code co~q~li~nce. Coatsstoner Sanders stated that once the compliance ~eso~ved, the Board can revisit the issue o~ ~mpac~ fees. (1972) ~ ~, ~ZNCZP~ OF ~S RZ~ S~L ~ ~ZN~ OF A ~RTZON Gary Brown, Principal of Naples High School, remarked that since 1960, Naples High School has been on Twenty-Second Avenue North. He atated that due to the renovations to the High School, the administra- tive offices will be located on Golden Gate Parkway. Mr. Brown stated that the student body, parents and administration would like to be identified with a permanent street address of Golden Eagle Parkway. Mr. Brown reported that the City of Naples is in favor of the address change. In response to Commissioner Constantine, County Manager Dorrlll etated that the name change must be coordinated with the Shertff's Office because of the effect on the enhanced 911 System. Coatsstoner Norris stated that he has no objection to the request. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Transportation Services Administrator Archibald replied that this Is a unique segment of road- way that does not have the addressing problems that occur elsewhere. He saJd that if the name change is approved, the only Implication would be changing the street signs at an approximate cost of $450.00. Mr. Brown stated that the Collier County schools will provide funds for the street signs. It w~ the con~an~u~ of tha Board to direct Staff to revisit this ~e~ue at · public hearing. (2207) Xtempl&l ~113t FACXLXTX~.~ &¢CEPTA.IICI FOR OL~N~OOR GREENS AT BRETONI~ PARK - BOO( (~0~.'~.~ ~2 Page Nay 3, 1994 County Manager Dotrill stated that this Ires is s routine facili- ties acceptance that had been placed on the agenda by the Board Office. Mr. Dorrlll said that they have paid the bond and the County Attorney's office has approved all the necessary documentation. Commissioner Saunders ~oved, seconded by Conicsloner Natthews, to approv~ th~ ~ter facilities acceptance for 01en~oor Greene at Bretom~ Park. Upon call for the question, the ~otton carried 4/0. aECOaDED ~S Oa aO0~ 1964, rACES (22~o1 Ite~#iCl ~lO ~l~O~, ~lON S~RTS ~ODU~ION~ ~ S~RTING ~ - O~ ~~ ~ TO ~ISl ON C~CI~ KILI~TION ~TZ3 IACZLZTIKS ~LI~ Coastsstoner Constantine announced that this item will be held In conjunction with Item #16C2. Public Services &dmtntetrator Olltff reported that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board heard Mr. Stgnorello's request and recom- mended that the current policy be maintained In this Instance. He said that they requested that Staff review the overall policy to see If opportunities exist for the County to offer sore tournament type events that could raise funds for the County. Mr. Signoreils, President of Champion Sports Productions, Inc., stated that he has revised his original request, because the way the policy is presently set an outside entity would not be allowed to rent the facility. Nr. SignoreIls stated that the dates chosen would impact the eco- no~r. Conlastoner Constantine said that he agrees with the request because tt provides a way to reclaim costs to the Parks and Recreation Departsent without burdening the public. He Indicated that the dates chosen are In the slowest time of the year In Southwest Florida and would benefit the economy. Page 12 ~ay 3, 1994 In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Olllff stated that the present policy does not allow people to make a profit while using the publt¢ parks. Commissioner Saunders agreed with Commissioner Constantine. He conflraed that he approves of the Softball Tournament on July 16 and 17, 1994, however, he would like the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to actively evaluate what the policy should be so that It could be uniformly applied. C~gmtootoner S~u~d~r· moved, seconded by Comets·loner Iorrt·, to ~mthorlz· tbe Softbell Tournament on July 16 ~nd 17, 1994, at $16.00 per hour, stipulating that this Is a on· time approval, end to direct tha Parks end Recreation Advisory Board to advise · policy that would 8pplyunlfoz~lt~y to all users of those facilities. ~/pon call for the question, the motion carried 4/0. (2842) COM~ZIF~ATIOI TO FURCRAWl PROP~TY OMI~D BY THE GULF COJ~T tITTLE L~/~, INC. FOR & COI~UNZTY PJLR~ - APPROVED ZNTH~ JUgOUST OF $88,000.00 Deena ~utnn, Real Property Supervisor, explained that in February Staff advised the Board of the following; 1) that the property has been appraised at $310,000,00 for land and Improvements; 2) that a sales agreement has been prepared that reflects the property would be used perpetually as a ballfield and park; 3} That the Initial price of $84,526.00 be Increased to $86,000.00 to cover Improvements; 4} that the tittle Leatlue wishes to retain priority use of the property, con- tinue to operate a concession stand, store equipment and retain adver- tising board revenue until all contracts have expired; 5) that the County be responsible for specific maintenance within a three year period; 6) that the Pollution Control Department has advised that the contamination caused by the fuel leak has been found to be at accep- table levels; and ?) that a survey of the property be acquired to correct a legal description discrepancy. MS. Quinn confirmed that since that time Staff has negotiated with Page 13 1994 the Little Lea;us to prepare a revised Sales Agreement which deletes the use conditions and Increases the purchase price to $88,000.00. She said that a Use Agreement has also been developed to require that 1) If the property is no longer used as a ball field, the County shall provide a facility within two miles of the property; 2} that the Little League will Indemnify the County; 3) that the Little League provide a certificate of insurance; 4) that the County maintain the property; 5) that the County reserve the right to charge use fees for non-Little League events; and 6) that the Use Agreement will terminate in ninety-nine years. Ns. quinn reported that Staff Is unable to negotiate on the Liquidated Damages clause In the Sales Agreement which includes a 10~ fee, adding that Staff feels 5~ is adequate. Ns. quinn stated that there are two points in the Use Agreement that could not be negotiated; the insurance amount and the indemnifi- cation. In response to Co--lsstoner Norris, Ns. quinn replied that a clause could be provided that would state that the property will not be used for the expansion of the sewer treatment plant. Coalsstoner Saunders commented that he agrees with the restric- tion. He expressed concern with the stipulation that the County must provide similar property within two miles In the event that It no longer is used as a ballfield. He stated that he would prefer that the property revert back to the Little League In that event. The following people spoke on the subject: Kevin Dentt Cliff Crawford Steven Vergo In response to Commissioner Constantine, Jeff Walker, Risk Management Director, replied that the County does not have Indem- nification language with the other Little Leagues. He said that this agreement has been handled differently because this park is utilized specifically for this purpose. Commissioner Natthews stated that she does not agree with the Page 14 Hay 3, 1994 tndemalflcat ton language, Commissioner Saunders etated that he has no difficulty with the 10~ default payment or the limited liability clause. He said that the reverter clause should work both ways, If the County ceases to use the property as a Little League field, the property would revert back to the Little League or a similar facility would be built within two miles. In responce to Coastsstoner Constantine, Mr. Olliff replied that the cost for a ballfield with lights would be approximately $150,000.00 per field plus the purchase price of the land. CoIIlealoner iIorrle ioved, macondad by Commiesloner Saundera, to I~provt the ~greeIint with the following ettpulatlonI: thIt & 10~ derm~lt p~y~ent be included; that the r-tttla League indainif¥ only tbilr o~n negligent acre; that a clause be Included to stipulate that thI l~nd will never be used for m eewir plant e~lon; ~nd that a reverter clause be included in the deed that will &1low the County to ret'g~m mm~rehl? beck to Gulf Co,It r. ittle League or provide a almllv f&¢llit~ within ~ mtlem. Commissioner Matthews stated that a similar situation was dlec~uaeed previously. She recalled that a field was accepted as a gift with very few restrictions. Commissioner Matthews stated that she cannot agree to the restric- ttone and the reverter clause. She said that she Is not sure this is a fair way to handle the receiving of this park. Opon call for the question, the Iotlon cerrled 3/1 (Coiileelonar o;pua.d). *** s,-E PACES- s$, Recess 11:00 A.N. - Reconvened 11:10 A.N. at which time Deput~ Clark Hoffman replaced Deputy Clerk ILarbtrattl see ]:t e111 #~2 RIC~TION TO RKVTS~ TH~ CLASS SPeCIfICATIONS FOR THE UTILTTZ~S ~KRV~C!~ AJIM~NISTRATOR AND CO~B~INITY DKVKLOPMKNT ADMINISTRATOR CL&S$IFIC&TIOIJB - EDUCATIONAL RKQUI~$ FOR BOTH POSITIONS TO P.D~IN ItS f~'~qlq.KJlTLY $PWClIPIltD AND NOT AS PROPOSED County Manager Dorrill remarked that this Item was continued from the meeting of April 26, 1994. He Indicated that Administrative May 3, 1994 Services Administrator Ochs prepared a memorandum which has been pro- vided to the Board (copy not provided to the Clerk's Office). Mr. Dorrlll remarked that the current experience and educational requirements for the Utility Services Administrator and Community Development Administrator are contained in the executive summary. He recalled that there Is confusion with regard to a Bachelor's degree. He Indicated that there has never been an absolute requirement for a degree. He noted that the actual lan~ruage says "a degree a<lutvalence". Nlth regard to the CouunJty Development Administrator's position. Mr. Dorrill Indicated that the intent Is to give additional years experience In lieu of a Master's equivalence. He stated that the Count¥'a labor attorney suggested that the Board review this Issue prior to conducting the interview process. In response to Commissioner Constantine, County Manager Ocrrill expl&lned that the Bachelor's degree spec indicates that this Is an equivalence issue. Mr. Dorrtll reported that a committee comprised of members from the Development Services Advisory Board will pre-screen and short list the 192 applicants. He remarked that the Commission must confirm the hiring of any Individual who is nominated. The following persons spoke with regard to this Itel: Doug McOilvra Oilbert Erlichman Commissioner Saunders recalled that at the meeting of April 26, 1994, the Board was asked to conelder reducing the educational requirements for the Community Development Services Administrator and the Stiltties Administrator even though 100+ applications had been mollcited for these positions. Administrative Services Administrator Ochs concurred that staff is · uggesttng that the years of experience be Increased from 6 to 10 and that the current requirement of the equivalent of a Master's Degree be reduced to the equivalent of a Bachelor's Degree for the Community Page 16 Hay 3, 1994 Develol~ent Services Ad~tntstrator. Contsstoner Saunders questioned whether the reduction In the edu- cational requirements is being requested so that the work experience of one specific Individual would meet the new criteria. Hr. Dorrtll replied that this Is not the Intent of the request. County Hanager Dorrtll explained that Dick Clark can be minimally qualified through the equlvalency definition of the current Haster'e degree requirement. Co~atsstoner Saunders remarked if this is the case, he does not understand why staff is requesting that the educa- tional requirements be reduced. County Manager Dotrill revealed that of the seven division admi- nistrators, four have Haster Degrees in either business, public admi- nistration or engineering. He remarked that one administrator has a Bachelor's degree, but Is also a registered engineer. He stated that another administrator does not have a college degree, however, he has 35 years of related experience tn emergency services and fire depart- ments. Co~tsstoner Saunders related that Hr. Dorrtl! ~ndtcatee that the one Individual meets the current educational requirements. He cited that there is no real reason to change the requirements, noting he is satisfied with the current rules. Hr. Ochs stated that the Count¥'a labor attorney suggested that the proposed changes be presented to the Board, however, there does not need to be a change in order to apply the equtvalency standards. County Manager Dotrill pointed out that the equtvalency gives 2 years of Job related experience for every one year of college educa- tion. He explained that in the event someone had a fair amount of experience but did not have a Haster's degree, there would be the abi- lity to keep that person under consideration for final recommendation to the Board. In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Hr. Ocha advised that the Job posting for the Cosununtty Development Administrator asked for 10 years of experience with a Haater~e Degree preferred. Page 17 May 3, 1994 Coalssloner Matthews remarked that she does not support staff's recoaendation as it stands since there does not appear to be any substantive changes and questioned why this Is being requested. Coulsstoner Norris called attention to Mr. Ochs' memo and noted that all the requirements allow for equivalency with the exception of the Transportation Services Administrator and questioned why the changes are being suggested. County Manager Dorrtll explained that with regard to the Naster's requirement, an Individual would typically have gone to college for six years, however, if a person has never attended college, 12 years of related practical Job experience would be accepted in lieu of either degree. Commissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthew~ and c~-z'led 4/0, to maintain the educational requirements as currently con~titmted ~ndnot u proposed by staff. (16181 FOLLOW-UP TO THI GLADES PUBLIC PKTITION FOR ESTABLISHING ITS OMN MULTIoFAMILYRECYCLING PRO(tRAM - NO ACTION County Manager Dorrtll announced that this Item was continued from the meeting of April 26, 1994 when the Board directed the Glades' representative and the representative from Waste Management to meet to determine whether a compromise could be reached. Mr. Mike Hesse/, representing the Glades Country Club Apartment Association, expressed thanks to Waste Management (WM) for working with the residents In reaching a reasonable agreement. He explained that an agreement has been reached whereby WM will provide a recycling program based on curbside pick up and providing small containers for one year. He indicated that at the end of one year, If the Glades ~anagement determines the program is not working, WM will exempt the Glades from the contract without an Impact to any other folks that would be in the contract program. He noted that the Glades, if it does become exempt, would be responsible for disposing of any of Page 18 Hay 3, 1994 rec~clabiee. Mr. Michael Kennedy, representing Waste Management, advised that he concurs with the statements made by Mr. Hessel. In answer to Commissioner Matthews, County Manager Dartill replied that an axpreseton of interest had never been received from any resi- dential or commercial endeavor to opt out of the program, however, this could have been written into the original bid specifications. Mr. Kennedy revealed that many expressions of interest to be included have been received from people that are not included in the program, Io action was r~uir~d on thie action. Xtw~ ~1 ~ D~ ~ ~I~ WI~ ~SS OF D~LOPZNG ~ ~ING ~ Transportation Services Administrator Archibald stated that this item Involves the Rattlesnake Hammock Road corridor from U.S. 41 to C.R. 951. He Indicated that this road segment is approximately four alles In length; one-half of which Is developed and serves 3,000 units. He remarked as this corridor continues to be developed to C.R. 951, there is the potential to serve 10,000 units. Mr. Archibald requested that consideration be given to Increasing the roadway from two lanes to four lanes and recognizing that as build-out approaches In 15-20 years, a six lane facility may be required. With regards to Level of Service (LOS), Mr. Archibald reported that the existing two laned roadway has the capacity of handling 13,400 vehicles per day. He explained that the average capacity is between 9,000 - 12,000, however, the peak season this year resulted In approximately 18,000 vehicles per day. Mr. Archibald stated that based upon available funding, staff is proceeding with the design for this corridor. He noted that hope- Page 19 ~ay 3~ ~994 fully, construction for this project could commence in late 1995 or early 1996 and be completed late 1996 or early 1997. Nr. Archibald remarked that various options are available and staff has conducted a series of Informational meetings with the various property owners associations. He Indicated that one option involves utilizing the 100' of right-of-way, however another option is that the sidewalk would be constructed outside the existing 100' of right-of-way and the residents would be asked to donate 5-10 feet of right-of-way for the sidewalk in addition to considering the right-of- way for turn lanes. Mr. Archibald pointed out that a number of the residences are located very close to Rattlesnake Hammock Road and County Barn Road ~nd there are already noise related problems. He explained that there are three or four locations along Rattlesnake Hammock Road where a wall would have to be placed to mitigate the existing noise problem as well as the problem that may occur as trefflc Increases on this corri- dor. Nr. Archibald reported that many residents believe that improving the roadway, will only attract more vehicles to this corridor. He remarked that this roadway is currently very heavily used. Mr. Archibald stated that many residents feel providing sidewalks ~nd bike lanes is very extravagant and not cost effective. Nr. Archibald advised that currently Rattlesnake Hammock Road has · speed limit of 45 miles per hour and concerns have been cited that the new facility maintain that speed. Nr. Archibald suggested that staff return to the dr·wing board to do the following: review the 100' of right-of-way on the eastern end of the corridor; confine the activities to the 100' of right-of-way ·nd provide the sidewalk within the 100'; provide sufficient medians for turn lanes; accommodate two additional lanes In the future, If needed; and delete the concept of bike lanes. Mr. Archibald reported that cross section would be confined to the 100' of right-of-way with the exception of U.S. 41 and County Barn Page 20 Hay 3, 1994 Road which are major Intersections. He related that turn lanes will b~ needed and additional rights-of-way would be acquired. He remarked that additional rights-of-way would need to be acquired for water nana~enent. Mr. Archibald recommended if the property owners along the corri- dor desire to Improve their access to Include turn lanes, that they donate the riGht-of-way and the County would build the turn lanes. In response to Commissioner Norris, Hr. Archibald advised that the median would be reduced from 38' to 28' or 29' and this would allow for the sidewalk without condemninG any property with the exception of that which has been noted. Comlssloner Norris stated that he does not envision the need to ever increams this roadway to six lanes. Ne suggested that the pro- Ject be constructed on a four lane basis and narrowing the medians which would still provide for the bike lanes. Commtsaloner Constantine questioned whether any consideration has Given to lowering the speed zone on this roadway. He disclosed that when 45 miles per hour is posted, people are traveling at 55 or 60 miles per hour. Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained that the existing two lane speed studies Indicate that during certain times of the day when there Is a lot of congestion tn the corridor, the speeds are below 45 miles per hour, but at other times durinG the day when there are open conditions, and to the east of County Barn Road, the apeads are above 45 miles per hour. He noted that a lessor speed limit could be posted, if desired. The following persons spoke with regard to this item: Harold Hill/ams Raphael Domzall Gilbert Erllchman In response to Commissioner Constantine, Hr. Archibald advised that all the condominiums along Rattlesnake Hammock Road lack turn lanes and staff recommends that they be provided. He stated that the benefiting parties would be the condo owners along that corridor and PaGe 21 ~ay 3o ~994 if they provide the land, the County would construct the turn lanes. In answer to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Archibald revealed that in accordance with the annual AUIR inventory and update of the Growth Management Plan, the capacity of Rattlesnake Hammock Road is 13,400 vehicles per day. He reported that the traffic counts for the first quarter of 1994 reflect 14,500 vehicles per day on the segment from County Barn Road to U.S. 41; 18,500 vehicles per day for the segment east of the Trail; and 5,700 vehicles per day for the segment from Polly Avenue to C.R. 951. Commissioner Constantine remarked that he does not foresee an over-whelaing demand for six-laning Rattlesnake Hammock Road and · uggeated disregarding same; consideration be given for a bake path; and cosunit to providing turn lanes to the various condominiums in cooperation with the property owners; and review the speed Issue. Mr. Archibald stated that Option "B" has a 38' median and staff is suggesting that this be reduced to 29'. He noted that the median could be further reduced to 20' to develop a 6' sidewalk, if desired. Com~iuloner 84mnd~re ~oved, seconded by Comiaaloner Ilartie and carried 4/0, that staff be directed to continue with the process of developing the fo~e lanlng of Rattlesnake Hammock Road u~ing Option 'Am with the following ~odification~: reduce the m~dian to the g~eate~t ~twnt practical; m~alntatn sidewalkm on both sides of the ro~d; examare that there is a relatively lo~ speed limit; that the ro~ ~ot be constructed any closer to the residential areu than it p~ee~ntiy is, if po~eible; and that staff ~urmue cooperative efforts with the propwry Gemera with regard to the turning lanes. Xte~ #10B R~O~YI'XO~ 04-324 AUTHORXZXMG THE XSSUANCK OF NOT ~XCKEDXMG $16,000,000 HOUSXMG FXMA~Cme AUT~ORXTY OF COLLIER COUNTY NULTX-FA~XLY ~ ~OiFD~ FOR Y~ SADDLEBROOX VXLLAG~ APARlq~rf9 PRO~CT - ADOPTED Attorney Don Pickworth stated that the Housing Finance Authority of Collier County held a hearing on April 13, 1994, to consider this Page 22 May 3, 1994 project ~nd determined to proceed with financing, pending approval by the Board of County Casualsstoners. Mr. Pickworth advised that Saddlebrook Village is a 220 unit apartment project located at the intersection of Davis Boulevard and Radio Road. He Indicated that in order to be financed by the Housing Finance Authority, a percentage of the units must be rented to indivi- duals with an income of no more than 60~ of the area median income. Mr. Pickworth explained that approval of this financing does not constitute any t~pe of land use approval by the County. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Affordable Housing Director Mlhalic advised that the developer has to provide affordable housing units and per his agreement with the County, at least 30~ of the units are to be affordable. He revealed that using bonding financing will require the developer to provide 40~ of the units to be affordable. He indicated if other financing mechanisms are procured, i.e. low ~ncome housing tax credits, 100~ of the units would have to be affor- dable. Mr. Martin Hennassay, representing Saddlebrook Village Apartments, revealed if the tax exempt bond issue Is approved, there will be 40~ affordable and 60~ ~arket rate apartments. He noted if taxable market rate financing is pursued the units would be 100~ affordable. Mr. Mlhalic explained that Mr. Hennassay has not been granted any impact fee deferrals for this project. He revealed that Mr. Hennassay would have to submit an application Jn this regard and present same to the Board. Frances Barsch spoke with regard to this item. Attorney Pickworth advised that because of concerns about the uount of tax exempt bond financing in the United States, the Housing Finance Authority operates under state volume caps and only a certain uount of tax exempt bond financing can be done in every state. He axpl&~ned in order for the Housing Financing Authority to move forward with the financing, application has to be made to the state for an allocation of this volume cap. 34 Page 23 Hay 3, 1994 In response to Co~mlssioner Matthews, Mro Mthallc reported that the Affordable Housing Agreement addresses the total parcel. He stated if the project will be phased, there is a mandated requiresent for one phase and the developer would have to neet the second phase requiresants. Mr. Hennassay stipulated that this project will have a etnteum of 40~ affordable units. ~mion~r Ilorrts ~ov~d, uconded by Commissioner Saunders and c~t~l~d i/O, to ~pprovs the request by ths Rousing lln~nce Authority of Collier County, thereby adopting Resolution 94-314. Page !~a¥ 3, 1994 Zt:el #2.00 Ie~SOLOTZO~ 94-325, AFPOZITX]ICi IAJICY 3. NANPL~R TO TH~ NARCO XSLAXD B~AU2~F~CATlO!I ADVISORY CO!44XTTZ~ - ADOPTED Co.~teeloner Iorr~e Boved, eeconded by Co-ml.e~oner eaurider. and ~t~ 4/0, t~t N~ J. ~ler ~ ap~tnted to the ~rco Isl~d kntlf/cati~ ~lmow 0mirtee, ~d t~t Resolution 94-325 ~ ~t~. Page 25 May 3, 1994 ( 72o) Xtmm elOD DXL-'~:~XMI ~Z &ODX! Off $OT-XD NASTZ - CO~ ~G~ TO ~ ~ ~ ~ A~X~ Col~lsstoner Saunders remarked that traditionally, Coopers & Lybrand has been used to perform audits of the Solid Waste contrac- tors. He pointed out that according to a memorandum from Internal Auditor Jim Mitchell to Clerk Dwight Brock, of the $146,000 remitted tO the County by contractors, approximately 30~ of those dollars are spent to audit those figures. Commissioner Saunders stated that Clerk Brock has advised that his department has the ability to perform these audits in-house at a · ubstantlal savings to the County of approximately $50,000 per year. Clerk Dwight Brock pointed out that the proposal submitted and discussed with the Solid Waste Department was not to perform the entire audit, using the scope that Coopers & Lybrand (C&L) has used In the past, but rather to review what was taking place on a somewhat lesser scale in intermediate periods and then C&L would come in at a later date to perform their audit. Mr. Brock advised that Waste Management, Inc. Is a publicly traded corporation that has an Independent audit performed. He noted that certain rsvtew criteria will be established In conjunction with solid waste and the Internal auditing staff will go out, if requested, and attempt to keep tabs on what is taking place. Mr. Brock announced that he has discovered that approximately 1/4 to 1/3 of what Is being received In franchise fees is being spent for purposes of paying for the audit. Mr. Brock offered his services, if the Board so desires. ColBllllOner Saunders loved, seconded by Co=-tsstoner Norrll, that the C~t7 N~n4ger he directed to ~ork with the Clerk of Courts to tozml/lsl I relationship in terms of the Clerk performing the interim I~U~ltl II outlined tn the ~e~orandu~ u provided by Jim Mitchell, lnterzml i~itor. 48 Page 26 ~ay 3, 1994 County Nanager Dorrtll advised that he supports the offer of Clerk Brock. Be ~uggested that the Board consider having a Certified Public Accountant perfora the broader audit, not as It pertains to franchise fees, but based on what is a very high rate of return on the franchi- ses. He indicated that the Board may want to reserve the right to have a full cash audit done by a CPA to track and monitor the high profit ~argln of the franchises. Nr. Brock stated that during the term of the contract parameters should be set as to what the Clerk's office will be reviewing and how Haste Nanagement is operating. He concurred that C&L should perform an audit on a periodic basis, i.e. every three years. Nr. Dotrill remarked that staff believes tt may be a good idea to have a CPA perform an audit this year, skip a year, and do another one in 1996. He noted that he is In support of havtng the Clerk's Internal Auditor conduct a lesser scale Internal at, dtt as well. Commissioner Saunders clarified that assuming that his carries, his understanding Is that the auditing process will be con- ducted for the 1993 calendar year as well as 1994 and continue until the end of the contract. Upon all for the question, the motion carried i/0. !t~COI~I~MI~tTXOM TO C!!AMG~ ~ ~MALL QUAMTXTY OCCUPATIONAL LXC~Bg ~ - ~ ATTO~ TO ~VALffAT~ LZGALX~ AND !t~PORT BACE OM S/X?/94 Commissioner Constantine recalled that within the past year, over and above the regular $22.00 fee there has been a $28.00 surcharge for the Small 6eaerators of Hazardous Waste Program. He Indicated that there has been much confusion about that charge, particularly for the small companies that do not generate any waste. Commissioner Constantine remarked that in 1986, the voters approved an Environmental Pollution Control Fund of 1/10 mill and of that, only 40~ of what is collected each year Is being used. He · uggested that until the program is under control, it may be better Page 27 May 3, 1994 not to charge the $28.00 to people who may or may not need this program, He noted that the question has been raised as to whether this falls within the parameters of the 1986 ballot. Coutssioner Constantine suggested that the County Attorney pro- vide a written opinion to ensure that this is within the parameters of the 1986 ballot. The consensus of the Board was that the County Attorney evaluate the legality in this regard and report back in two weeks. Ztel#28 DZSCUSSZOII R~ COUNTY ~INIS~TOR'S Coalsstoner Constantine stated that the County Administrator's anllual review has traditionally been conducted after the summer recess. He noted that Mr. Dorrtll's Initial anniversary date is in May, however, under the new contract, it is October let. Couissioner Matthews suggested that _f the Manager's anniversary date is October l, the evaluation could be done in September. Mr. Dotrill advised that his contract was executed on August l?, ~993 and the effective date of the agreement is September 15, ~993. (248?) Zte~,14 DZ~U~SZON It~ ~DOLZNG OF B~ET LZ~ l~ ~ZNG8 - ~ZNG8 TO BE ~ ~ ~ ~6, IT ~ 20, 1994 ~ 8:30 A.M. - 3:00 P.M. County Manager Dotrill recalled that last year, the Board set three days for the review of the budget line Items. He suggested that these meetings be concluded by the July 4th weekend. The Board concurred to conduct the budget line item meetings on June 16, l? and 20, 1994, from 8:30 A.M. until 3:00 P.M. si$ COlllLllLo~er Ioz~le loved, Ilconded by Col~llltoner Slmndmrl ud c4ar~d &/O, that the following tteu under the consent agenda be approved and/or adopted: ess ltel#lS&l ~LIICE OF A CJL~EZER'S CIRCE IK)R #ATER FACILITIES FOR THE BRZt3RTOR AT P~LICAN BAY - W2~lq~ STIPULATIONS LISTED ~X TH~ mCUTIVE SUMMARY RECORDED IN OR BOOR 1962 PACES 46 - 62 Page 28 H~y 3, 1994 94-303 I~ JLPPROV&L TO D~R 011~ ]~IDR~D ~C~ (100~) OF ~ ~ S~-[X~ (78) ~LXRG ~l~ OF ~ 78 ~XT B~XNQ ~O~ TO B~ BUXLT ~ ~SS ~X~, A ~SSXSSXPPX L~ P~XP, ZW COLLIER CO~, ~RXDA ~ LXB~ ~T~ ~, P~ ~ ~TION~ ~ACILITIES I~ACT ~ES, R0~ ~, ~G~ ~DXCAL I~A~ ~ES, ~ EDUCATXON~ FACILITIES See Pages ~/- Item e16&3A 94-304 FROVZDING FOR ASSeSSMelT OF LI~I FOR THE COST OF ~ A ~ZC ~l~C~ C~Z~C~ S~1~ C~ NO. 30316-184, ~ ~ ~ - D~I~ C~O - GIS~ C~O See Pages RE~OLUTIOR 94-305 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSM~I~ OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE A~IkI'~q~IT OF & PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30305-052, OMN~t OF R~CORD - 30AQUINA CONCEPCION See Pages 7~'-- ~'~ RZ~OT~TIOI 94-300 FROVIDING FOR ASSESSMRRT OF LIEN FOR ~1~ COST OF THE A~AT~:IFf OF& FUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SFRVICES CASE NO. 30917-034, (MII~OFI~CORD - ALlUreD CORTIR.~IZ~ - ALeX CONTINJ~W'Z~. See Pages 94-307 FROVXDXNO FOR ASSESSMZNT OF LIEN FOR ~ COST OF TH~ OF A FUBLXC NU/SANCE COMPLXANCE S~XVXCES CASE NO. 31013-098, Iteu#16A31 See Pages ~OLUTZON 94-300 FROVIDIRG FOR ASSESSHERT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF THE aWaT~lE]lT OF & PUBLIC NUISANCE COKPLIJU~CE S~RVICES CASE NO. 31001-040, ~ OF E~CORD - ELB& DNVET~PNNRT CORPORATION ZtmaelSA3F SeePages RESOLUTION 94-309 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE &BAT~I~ET OF A FUBLIC NUISANCE COMI~LIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 31012-021, ~ OF R~CORD - ~LBA DEVELOPM~IT CORPORATION See Pages 500~( 000r'~.: 5i Page 29 1994 It~O'~,OTIO~ 94-310 PItOVXDXNG FOR &SSESSM:gIIT Or LX~]I FOR ~ COST ON ~ AB&~ OF A FUBLXC NUXS~NC~ COMPLI&NCE SERVXC~ C&~E NO. 30708-015, OM~ OF ~O~D - ~ 3. FRXEDHA~ See Pages Itel RI~OLUTIOJl 94-311 FROVIDINO FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE AB&T~N~T OF & PUBLIC NUISJLNC~ COMPLIJLRCE S]~q:~VICES CASE NO. 30708-016, ]:tel ~16&3! 94-312 FROVIDING FOR ASSESSI(KFf OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF TH~ OF A FUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SKItVICKS CASE NO. 30708-017, R~CORD - !~t&NK #. GORMAR & KATHERINE N. GORNAN See Pages ~_~'-- F,~ 94-313 PltOVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF THE JI~tTIJ~JrTOFA FUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SKRVICES CASE NO. 31019-069, OIIJI~ROFRI:C~:~ - MARC D. JACOBSOR, Tit. SeePages.. RKBOLOT'ZON 94-314 PROVIDING FOR ASSES~qENT OF LIEN FOR TIlE COST OF THE AB, ILTIMI31T OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE C~IANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30707-201, 0MJrI:R OF RZCORD - DOUGLAS M. KELLY & DEBORAH L. KELLY It~8OLOTZOS 94-315 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMKJFF OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATDIKNT OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 30930-001, ONNIR OF RICORD - DOUGLAS M. KELLY & DEBORAH L. KELLY I~3LUT]:OJl 94-316 PROVIDING FOR ASSKSSMKJFT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE A~A~ OF A FOBLIC NUISANCE COI, G'LIANCE SERVICES CASK ~0. 31005-024, ~ OF ~ - 3*I')MT L. KOLDYX - RIRTUK 3. ]COLDYE s.e Page,, Item ~I&Ik3N E~SOLUT~ 04-317 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMaRT OF LIEN FOR TH~ CO~T OF THE AB&TINBrr OF & !q~BLIC NUISAJlUE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 31018-061, OMS~:R OF RIC~RD - ~ RATL BK OF FL ~0O~ 0~~'j": rt)~ Page 30 ~a¥ 3, 1994 RI~OLOTZON 94-31S FROVZDING FOR ASSESSI(B31T Or LIEN FOR ~ COST OF TKK A~tT~M~IT OF A PUBLIC IIUISANCE COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE NO. 32007-039, ~ OF ~ - ~ E. RODRIGUEZ & ZLVA RODRIGUEZ See Pages II:~TIOM 94-319 FItOVIDING FOR ASS~SN:ENT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF TI~ ABAI~I~3rf OF A FUBLIC ]!UISANCE CONFLZ~CE SERVICES CASE NO. 31007-011, OI~I~NOFIQ~D - B~I~ARDO I~IZ ·HINIANRUIZ See Pages !t~.~OLUT~ON 94-320 FROVIDING FOR ASSES~TI' OF LZEN FOR TI~ COST OF TH~ &~AI'I~I~ OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE COMPLZJUICH SERVICES CASE NO. 30707-068, OM!I~toFI~CORD - DONALD J. SLADICK · CAROL B. SLADICK N:~OLOTION 94-321FROVZDING FOR ASSESSI~qlT OF LIEN FOR THK COST O, THE ABAt'ID~NT OF A FUBLZC NUISANCE COI~rLZA~C~ SERVICES CASE NO. 30428-025 ~ OF R~'~3RD - G~ORGE · ALBERTA #A¥ SST Ztm. ~1~A4 See Pages .... ///-- AFFR:O~AL OF THI ASSZG3JJ~:NT OF AGR~KXKNT AUTHORIZING AfFORDAbLE HOUSING I:~I~FTY BOB~B AID IMPOSZNG COVKNABTS AJFD RKSTRZCTIOHS ON REAL See Pages /f~u~ ~ / ASS17RAJICE ~T ~ ~ 0F CO~ OF C~SSZO~ Z~ TO ~ ~~ ~R P~ZCZPATZ~ ZN ~ ~RZDA ~ZFZKD See Pages d~.~ Item e16Bl F~ZO~Z'Z'ZZ~D LIST OF C~T~ ~R ~C~g S~ S~ZCES TO ~ ~ ~~TZ~ DZ~Z~ IN ACCO~CE Ml~ ~ 93-2131 Item #1~cl ACCKPT~ OF A 0250.00 DKPOSIT FROM THE FRIKJIDS OF THI LZBRARY OF COLL~~, ZJIC, TO PROTECT COOtrTT FUNI~ ZN ~ OPKRATZC~ OF A CJI:I3)TTCAJI:DFAXMACHII~ IX TH~ NEAZ)4~~ LIBRARY Page 31 1994 APT'ROVA~AND~ARCE OF LEASE AGRE~MERTNITH LEWIS COLLINS FOR TH~ CO~t"J]IOED ~B~ OF OFF/CE SPAC~ IN II,BJOEAL~'~ M~ICR IS CURRg]ITLY OTILIZED BTT~ ~I'FF'S OFFIC~ AS A SUBSTATION - 8617.40 FERN ONTI] See Pages It~#16F1 R~.OT~011 94-322 R~ AG]~EN~NT BgTNE~N BCC AND TI~ STAT~ OF F~ORIDA DBPAKTI~]~T O~COI~I0~ITT AFFAIRS FOR TI~ E~BANCENENT OF COI~10NICATION FACILZT/E~JUID~O/PN~NT IN S1/PPORT OFTBE RADIO AMATgURCIVIL ~~CZS (RAC~S) PROGRAM BCC ~ C~KT/FZCATES OF CORRgCTION TO THE 2991, 1992, 1993 &lid 1994 ~O~D~L~T~COEZ~CTIO~SPECI&LAS~S~RENTROL~S, A~C)RI~ ~ C~LTI~&MITO SZG]ITH~ C~TIFICAT~S ON BEHALF OF TH~ BCC &ND AOTHORIZE Item R~SOLIFTZON 94-323 ADDITIONAL UNXTS TO TN~ 1994 COLLX~ COUNTY MJIJIDA~ ~OLXD MAST~ COLLICTXON 31:r~CIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL AND &UTHORIZ~ C~AI]I~IAII'TO ~ CERTIFICATES OF CORF.~CTION MeARDBID~94-2190 FOR TI~ GOIU:)ON RIVER EXTENSION CLEARING PROJECTTO T~ FIlOF~ONltO~ TREE SERVICE, A DIVISION OF LEWIS Tlt~g S~NVlCE INC. OF CT,~A!O~T~R, FLOItIDA, IN TH~ A~!OU~T OF 020,000.00 AND AUTHORIZATION ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 6 GOLF/CO~ CL~S ~T ~LL B~IT A~I~OVan OF ~UFFL~]~NTAL AGREENENT NO. 6 ACCEPT CONPLrI'~D CONSTRUCTION OF ~ZO ~, ~~ OF ~ ~, ~ ~~ OF FZN~ FA~ ~ ~ ~~, INC. ON CO~ RO~ ~O~ NO. 65033 - IN ~ ~ ~ $236,920.6~ Pagw 32 ,age, I~~1" Iqq May 3, 1go4 AFPRI~AL OF COB'fRACT A~ FOR TOURIST DKVKLOPMI3~ TAX FUND13B3 WITH ~ IIAT~OIAL GOLF CLOB, INC. - IN THE AMOUIIT OF $52,500.00 ~ee Page,.. ~00-~o~, M~SC~ COJ~ - FILKD AID/OR The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and or referred as presented by the Board of County Commissioners. ~oo~ 01~0~,~.~ 55 Page 33 ~a7 3, 1994 Item el631 CERTZ~CAI~B OF CORRECTION TO THE TAX ROLLS AS PRESKNTKD BY THE PROFI3tTYAPFRAISKR 1993 TAX ROLL Io. Data 186 04/21/94 1993 TAXGIBLK PERSONAl, PR01~RTY 136/137 04/13/94 1992 TAX ROLL 179 0(/21/9( TIME FOR IRM&TE NO. 84678 SATISrACTIOI O! LII]I FOR SERVICES 0Y THE PUBLIC DKI~JDER See Pages Itom ~1611 ZI'2'I~TN ~Cl~ Z~TIOR ~ OF 3/31/94 See Pages 59 Page 34 May 3, 1994 There being no further business for the Good of the County, the Leering was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 1:35 P.M. .D~GI~T !e.. BR~K,~LERK ~ '.ee app~oved by the Board on ae preented ~ or as corrected BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL D~T~ICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL/ Page 35