Loading...
BCC Minutes 06/07/1994 RNaples, Florida, June 7, 1994 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION In Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Timothy J. Constantine VICE-CHAIRMAN: Betrye J. Matthews John C. Norris Michael J. Volpe Burr L. Saunders ALSO PRESENT: Sue Barbtretti, Ellis Hoffman and Marilyn Fernley, Deputy Clerks; Dwight Brock, Clerk of Court; Neil Dorri11, County Manager; William Hatgert, Assistant County Manager; Jennifer Edwards, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects Management Director; Dick Clark, Acting Community Development Services Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Mike Smykowskt, Acting Budget Director; Bob Mulhere, Acting Current Planning Director; Tom Olliff, Public Services Administrator; John Yonkosky, Assistant to the County Manager; Barbara Cacchtone, Jeff Perry, Ray Bellows, Planners; Deputy Rosa Hernandez-White, Shertff's Office and Sue Ftlson, Administrative Assistant to the Board. Page Tape AGenDA - &PlYOViD NZ'I'H CH&RG~S June ?, lg94 Co~atlelonar Norris moved, seconded by Co~teetoner Saundarl and carried unanimously, to approve the agenda with the changes as datalled on the Agenda Change Sheet, and the additional changea: Item #8A1 - Withdrawn Item #11A moved to Item #4C2. Item #16J moved to Item #1OF. Item #16H6 moved to Item #8H4. Item #16A8 moved to Item #8A6. Page 2 CON$~T AGenDA - APPROVED AND/OR ADOPTED June 7, 1994 The motlon for approval of the consent agenda is noted under Item #16. (200) X~em #3 MINUTES OF T~E R~aULAR MEETIN~ OF MAY 10, 1994, THE CITY/COUNTY JOINT MEETIN~ OF MAY 11, 1994, THE REOULAR M~ETINO OF MAY 17, 1954 AND TH~ SPECIAL ME~TIN~ OF MAY 18, 1994 - APPROVED Commission Volpe moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews ~nd carried unanimously, to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 10, 1994, the Minutes of the City/County Joint Meeting of May 1994, the Regular Meeting of May 17, 1994 ~d the Special Meeting of M&y 18, 1994. (212) Xtll IXPLOYZZ SERYXCE AMA]~S - PRESENTED Commissioner Constantine congratulated the following employees for their service with Collier County Government: Dale Stodge! - ~0 Years, Transportation Services Sharon T. Newman - 10 Years, Management and Budget Kevin McDonald - 5 Years, Emergency Services Jeffrey A. Walker - § Years, Risk Management Cindy Erb - 5 Years, Utilities Engineering Philip So/dan - 5 Years, Fleet Management (279) Item ,4B2 PROCLAMATION HONORIN~ COMMENCEMENT ~994 - ADOPTED Upon reading of the proclamation, Commissioner Volpe moved, leconded by Commissioner Matthews ~nd carried un~nimousl¥, that the Proclltton honoring Commencement 1994, be adopted. The Proclamation was accepted by Dr. Dan White, Executive Director of Administrative Services for West D~visJon. NOTE: PROCLAHATION NOT PROVIDED TO CLERK TO BOARD OFFICR Page 3 Item 1401 BIr~-TO-WOR~ CORPORATE CHALLENGE AWARDS - FRESENTKD June ?, 1994 Anita Chapman, Bicycle Pedestrian Coordinator, presented awards to Boat Creek Gallery, Coastal Engineering, Naples Beach Hotel & Golf Club and Collier County Government Center. County Manager Dorrll! noted that Jo-Anne Leamar of the Clerk's Off~ce was presented with a special award for the longest bicycle ride to work. (~70) Item ,4C2 UFDAT~ ON COLLIER COUNTY D.R.I.L.L. ACADEMY - AUTHORIZZ $16,000.00 FOR SURVEY & DIRECT COUNTY ATTORNEY DEVELOP LKASE WITH STATE Kathleen Passtdomo, representing the Shertff's Office, reported that the State Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) has agreed to fund and build the facility. She said that the State would like the $400,000.00 that is allocated for the facility to be used as enhan- cement. Ms. Passidomo said she spoke to the architect group that HRS has been using in these pro,acts and they assured her that the funds will be available on July 1, 1994. She said that HRS has asked that a lease be prepared between Collier County and the State for the ground. She requested that the County Attorney be directed to work with her on the preparation of the lease. She requested that funds be made available for a boundary and topographical survey. She said that the State w~11 reimburse the $16,000.00 survey fee. Commissioner Saunders expressed his appreciation to Ms. Pass~domo. Co~m~lesloner Saunders moved, seconded by Couteatonar Volpe to authorize the expenditure of $16,000.000 for the ~urve¥ and direct the County Attorney on the lease In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Passidomo stated that the lease ks not for the stockade, Just the adjacent property. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Pass~domo reported that the Page 4 June ?, 1994 Solid Waste Department provided the survey. In response to Commissioner Norris, Ms. Passidomo stated that the re~ulation of these types of facilities are typically State regulated. Upon call for the question, the sotion carried unanimously. (2S00) Item ,6& BUDGET AMENDMENTS 94-406, 94-408, 94-419, 94-422, 94-4240 94-4260 94-426, 94-42?, 94-426 AND 94-433 - ADOPTED Acting Budget Director Smykowski stated that there are ten routine budget amendments requiring Board approval. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Smykowski replied that in reference to Budget Amendment 94-422, the Definity Phone System is used at the other Sheriff substations. In reference to Budget Amendment 94-424, Commissioner Matthews asked if the OCPM fee existed before the consolidation? Mr. Smykowski stated that the fees were not billed to a project and funded through the General Fund. County Manager Derrill confirmed that there is no double budgeting. Commissioner Volpe commented that the seventh month interim finan- cial report was included in the consent agenda. He asked if a verbal report could be presented. Mr. Smykowski stated that his office will provide a verbal revenue report. Commissioner Matthews stated that the quarterly information should be reviewed verbally. It was the consensus of the Board to request verbal financial reports. Co~aAesioner Norris moved, seconded by CometsSAcher Volpe and carried unanimously° that Budget Amendments 94-406, 94-408, 94-419, 94-422, 94-424, 94-425~ 94-426, 94-42?, 94-428 and 94-433 be adopted. County Manager Derrill remarked that the Clerk's Office should be notified of the request for a verbal report. Page 5 CLERE'S I~EPORT - APPROVED June 7, 1994 Co~aleeloner Saunders ~oved, eeconded by Co~ta~lonar Norris and carried unant~ouely, to approve the Clerk'e Report. ~REGORT ZAK RE MANDATORY USES OF WATER-SAVING POLYMERS - STAFF DIRECTED TO EXPLORE POTENTIAL OF POLYMERS Gregory Zak stated that the St. John River Water Management District has presented a directory to Counties to detail parame- ters in designing Ordinances implementing water conservation acts. Mr. Zak stated that polymers have been used world wade for many years with excellent results. He said that by using polymers, 66~ of water could be saved because 80~ is used on lawns and irrigation. Mr. Zak read a short report by the University of Florida regarding water usage. Mr. Zak reported that Pinelias County sold shower heads to residents in an attempt to reduce water consumption. Mr. Zak produced a Jar of polymer that sold for $Z§.00 per pound. He proposed to sell his product to the County at approximately $1.00 per pound so that County residents will have a source of water saving technology. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Zak stated that the polymer is applied to soil before seed or sod is put in place. He said that the effect of the polymer will last six to eight years. Commissioner Constantine suggested that the County could play an educational role. Commissioner Matthews stated that a family member has used a polymer product on their lawn with remarkable results. She said that the water bill was reduced 60~. She remarked that the concept should be explored. Commissioner Norris commented that the County could become Page 6 June 7, 1994 Involved on an educational basis, but would be opposed to acting as a wholesale supplier or adopt an Ordinance requiring the use of poly- mers. Commissioner Saunders stated that he agreed with both Commissioner Matthews and Commissioner Norris. He would like the County to explore the issue. Bob Mulhere, Acting Current Planning Manager, stated that infor- mation can be distributed through the Site Development Plan process and encourage the use of polymers. Commissioner Volpe stated that the Soil & Water Conservation District should be approached also. Mr. Gary Kirtland spoke on the subject. County Manager Dotrill reported that polymers have been used in some planting areas of the Collier County Government Complex. He said that program utilizing recycled water in residential homes is being explored. It was the consensus of the Board to direct Staff to explore the potential use of polymers. IteR ~7B ELIZABrlq~ BERG RE VETERINARIAN FOR ANIMAL CONTROt DKPARTM~NT - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED AT BUDGET WORKSHOP Elizabeth Berg proposed that an on site, full-t/me veterinarian be provided to the Animal Control Department. She said that a veteri- narian could provide daily, sustained care as opposed to the current system of care provided "as needed and on an emergency basis". She said that the criteria is so subjective and easily abused that they resulted in 1993 in the expenditure of $480.00 for over 6,000 animals. Ms. Berg stated that another advantage would be that the veteri- narian could perform the h~gh skill euthanasia which is now performed by Staff. Me. Berg stated that the veterinarian could perform the sterili- zation before re/easing animals for adoption thereby obtaining lO0~ Page 7 June ?, 1994 compliance as opposed to the current 50~ compliance. She said that if the veterinarian performed the sterilization the follow up paperwork and postage involving outside veterinarian could be saved. Me. Berg presented a chart that provided a budget appropriation of $49,000.00 for veterinarian fees for neuturing and $2,000.00 for veterinarian fees for care which total $§i,000.00. She said that an on site, full-time veterinarian could be paid $38,000.00 per year times 1.35 for benefits for a total of $51,300.00. Ms. Berg pointed out the $66,000.00 has been budgeted to go to outside veterinarian for neuturlng and care, $18,000.00 has been budgeted in license tips to outside veterinarians which total $?4,000.00 that could be appropriated for an in-house veterinarian. Ms. Berg stated that the County has 897,000.00 in annual funding sources, $65,000.00 in reserves, $85,000.00 revenue carry forward totalling $247,000.00 in available funding. Ms. Berg stated that the Board has no problem spending $566,000.00 for Improvements to Building B. She said that the Board has no problem spending $220,000.00 to improve the Board offices and chamber. She emphasized that animal control is a more Important issue. She concluded that as advocates for the well being of Collier County the Board of County Commissioners are expected to mandate con- ditions to accommodate all the inhabitants of Collier County. She asked that the Hoard not forget the needs of the non-human inhabi- tants. Commissioner Volpe commented that this issue could be more appropriately addressed at the budget hearings. Public Services Administrator Olliff etated that he could provide options to consider at the budget workshops. Commissioner Saunders stated that he would like to have infor- mation on the veterinarian procedure used in PAnel/as County. He stated that he is concerned about the present physical facility. Mr. Olliff suggested a mutual relationship with the Humane Society. 15 Page 8 June ?, 1994 Commissioner Constantine stated that additional information will be provided at the budget workshop. County Manager Dotrill stated that he will notify Ms. Berg when the budget workshop is scheduled. ~*~ Riceas 10:30 A.M. - Raconvsned 10:45 A.M. at which time ~puty Clerk Noff~mn replaced Deputy Clerk Barbirattl eae (3oeo) Ite~ 910A DISCUSSION ~ TH~ SABAL BAY PROJECT - NO ACTION Commissioner Norris stated that he requested that this item be placed on the agenda with the intention of asking the County Commission to forward letters to the parties involved with the Sabal Bay project, i.e. Collier Enterprises, the City of Naples and DEP, expressing a desire for the project to move forward since a number of positive benefits would accrue to the County. In response to Commissioner Norris, Environmental Services Administrator Lorenz explained that the Sabal Bay project will provide for an outlet for the Lely Basin Plan which is necessary for the proper management of stormwater within the entire Basin through Countryside and down County Barn Road. He indicated that there are several million dollars in capital improvements as part of the deve- lopment. In addition, Mr. Lorenz related that another benefit would be a spreader swale system which would take the storm waters that currently flow down the Basin through an old mosquito control ditch and spread the waters out to provide better timing of the quantity of flow that would reach the estuary system. Commissioner Norris pointed out that the Sabal Bay project would certainly provide many economic benefits to the East Nap/es area. Mr. Oliff Barksdale of Collier Enterprises advised that the pro- Ject was approved by Collier County but appealed by The Conservehey. He indicated that the County's portion of the project and the DRI are final and approved and not subject to any further appeal. He revealed 16 Page 9 June ?, 1994 that of the 2,000 acres, 50 acres are within the City of Naples. He noted that the only portion of the project that was requested to be done are the two channels that transverse the City area into the County which affects 3.55 acres of mangroves. He affirmed that the rest of the channels and the main marina basins are within Collier County. Tape #2 Mr. Barksdale cited that other benefits to the County as a result of this project are: donation of a 20 acre school site; one acre fire station site; one acre Collier County water pump station site; and the expansion of Bayview Park. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Barksdale revealed that there are two appeal processes proceeding concurrently: appeal of the issuance of the DER permit= and the denial of the Development Order by the City, however, this hearing will be held after there is a final ruling on the DER permit. Commissioner Saunders recalled that this project was approved by the Board of County Commissioners in 1986. He noted that he understands from the County's evaluation of the project, it was somewhat limited in terms of what typically is required of a project of this scope. He noted that he does not elect to reopen this issue since it was resolved by the prior Board and the parties are suf- ficient to ensure that DEP and the hearing officers are aware of the facts. He cited opposition to the County Commission takl~ any action in reference to this project. Commissioner Saunders read into the record, a letter from Jane Tlmmons. Commissioner Saunders remarked that the Board is being presented with a request to vote on a project that the Commission knows little about. Commissioner Volps concurred withe Commissioner Saunders' remarks and recalled that the Board of County Commissioners previously encouraged the City of Naples to meet with the developer to mediate Page lO ~une ?~ ~994 their differences. Be noted that the 10 year period is fast approaching in which the development order would have to come back to the Board for review. Be advised that he is not prepared to do anything more than what has already been done. Commissioner Matthews cited that she agrees with Co~missloner Volpe's comments. Mr. Barksdale remarked that there is a great deal of misinfor- mation on both sides of this issue. Mr. George Flagler spoke with regard to this item. No Action was taken on this issue. (420) Item #8A2 EVALUATION OF THE CONCEPT OF CjustERING DEVELOPMENT IN THZ A~RICULTURAL/RURAL LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR TBOSE ARKAS DESIGNATED AS NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION AREAS - STAFF TO CONTINU~ DEVELOPMENT OF AMENDMENTS TO THE PLAN AND BRING BACK ALTERNATIVES Long Range Planning Chief Cacchtone reported that on April 12, 1994, the Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board (EPTAB) requested that the Board evaluate the concept of cjustering within the Agricultural/Rural area of the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. She advised that this area currently permits densities at ! unit per 5 gross acres and does not permit cjustering. Ms. Cacchione stated that cjustering within Natural Resource Protection Areas (NRPA's) is a good concept that could be workable, however, there is a problem, since the NRPA's have not been defined. Ms. Cacchtone reported that EPTAB is suggesting that there be a general amendment to the Plan in the Agricultural/Rural area to allow for cjustering and that it be permitted in conjunction with a plan for each individual NRPA in order to take those factors Into account. In addition, she cited that EPTAB is suggesting another amendment to the Plan to Include the NRPA's on the Future Land Use Map and rather than causing any delay, that staff be authorized to revise the language and Include the NRPA's in the Land Development Code until the Comprehensive Plan is revised in 1996, and then those NRPA's would Page June 7, 1994 placed on the Future Land Use Map. Commissioner Matthews voiced concern that a general land use amendment would not control which NRPA's would be eligible for cjustering. Ms. Cacchtone replied that criteria could be drafted relating to the NRPA's that are appropriate and tie it specifically to the plan for that individual NRPA. Coutsstoner Matthews suggested that the designation be made at the time the NRPA is created and that a petitioner would not have the authority to request the Board to create cjustering within a NRPA merely because he owns land and desires to build on it. Commissioner Volpe remarked that the concept of cjustering within NRPA's may encourage development within these areas. Ms. Cacchione stated there is the potential for that type of negative impact and these are the things that have to be reviewed with each NRPA. Commissioner Volpe stated that in these areas development is per- mitted at one unit per every five gross acres. He suggested that net acres be utilized as opposed to gross acres. Commissioner Saunders advised that this concept should be eva- luated, and noted support of the proposal. He remarked that EPTAB is a very viable board and their recommendations are important. He thanked the members of EPTAB for their valuable input. Ms. Cacchlone suggested that staff be authorized to pursue an amendment, general in nature in the Comprehensive Plan to allow for the concept of cjustering. She remarked that staff would be very careful to tie the aspect of cjustering to a specific NRPA and the plan for that NRPA. that staff be directed to continue with the developlent of the Co~prehensive L~nd Use Plan amendment, providing for cjustering within NRPA~s as My be designated by the Board of County Coulsalonars from Mr. George Keller spoke with regard to this item. Commissioner Saunders aended the lotion to include direction Page 12 3'~ne 7, 3994 that mtmff prem~nt the alternatives to the Board prior to going through the Comprehensive Land Use amendment process. Commissioner Mmttheww accepted the amendment. Upon call for the question, the motion carried unmnlmouml¥. (985) Xtem #8A3 R~$0LUTXON 94-401 NOMINATING THE X~MOKALEE CO~fiqUNITY FOR A FEDERAL GRANT KNOWN AS THE EMPOWERMENT ZONE/ENTERPRISE C01~qUNXTY DESIGNATION - ADOFTID Long Range Planning Chief Cacchione announced that the Federal Government has Instituted a program called the Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community to assist distressed rural communities in order to create economic opportunities and sustainable economic deve- lopment. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Cacchtone noted that the private sector has been a strong proponent throughout the entire pro- cess as well as public participation of the community. The following persons spoke with regard to this item: Mr. Dudley Goodlette Mr. Fred Thomas, Jr. Commissioner Matthews moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and carried un~ullmouoly, to adopt Resolution 94-401, nominating the immokalee Community me an Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community and if needed, that the Chairman be authorized to write & letter for the Federal GovernBent to expedite Issuing the waiver for the Empowerment Zone. P~age 13 $~me ?, 199~ County Manager Derrill announced that this 1s a routine facilities acceptance, noting that all approvals have been met. Cman/ae/onar Norris moved, seconded by Coma/eeloner Volpe and carried 4/0 (ConicsLoner Saunders out), to approve the facilities for Dove Pointe Salem Center, Phase One, subject to the mtipulationm con- tatned An the Executive Susasty. RKCORDEO IN OR EOOK 1974 PACES 317 - 3~2 (1330) 2tel #8A6 BUDGET ~ REQUEST TO ESTABLISH THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING OR0ANIZATION (MPO) BUDGET FOR GI~%J~T YEAR 1994-95 - APPROVED Commissioner Constantine called attention to the third line object cods in the second section of the budget as reflected in the Executive Summary. He noted that $3,900 was budgeted last year, $3,000 spent for the current year and $100,000 is proposed for the upcoming year. MPO Coordinator Perry explained that the Federal Government is requiring that the long range transportation plan be updated to comply with federal regulations. He advised that the MPO has retained the services of a special consultant to perform services on call, as needed. He noted that these are functions that cannot be performed in-house. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Perry stated that this figure is 2/3 of what is allowed in the contract. He reported that he anticipates that these funds will be necessary for the deve- lopment of a 20 year financial plan, including maintenance and operating costs so that when the MPO evaluates projects for incor- poration into the ftys year work program, a life cycle analysis can be done to determine whether it would be a better improvement as compared to transit improvements or traffic operations improvements. Mr. Perry indicated that the MPO is also required, as per federal and state requirements, to develop a congestion management system in dealing with actual congestion. Mr. Perry pointed out that $30,000 is budgeted for other machinery and squipment. He remarked that both the City and County have asked for traffic counting equipment and it has been determined that the grant funds can be used in this regard. He noted that the City has requested 12 new traffic counters and the County is asking for 15 new traffic counters. He revealed that the existing equipment is failing and ta also antiquated. Commissioner Volpe moved, seconded by Colmialtonsr Norris and c~t~l~ 4/0 (Co~m~elioner Slunders out), to approve the :1994-95 budget for the ~. (~oo) ~CO~ID~TION OF ~E ~ST~ ~C~ O~ ~FLICATION FOR ~ ~~ CO~I~R ~AG~ P~ (C.R. 29 ~ON U.S. 4~ TO ~O~OLO~ ISm) - O~ION ~1 ~O~D Transportation Services Administrator Archibald explained that this Item relates to the ISTEA funding for the Everglades Corridor Management Plan that was considered by the Board on May 18, 1994. Mr. Archibald called attention to the issue of in-kind services, as approved by the Board. He indicated that staff has subsequently been informed by state and federal officials that the In-kind service will not qualify as part of the match required. As a result, he noted that the funding application will need to be reconsidered from the standpoint of the County commitment. Mr. Archibald announced that the three items included in the Corridor Plan are: a bike path extending from U.S. 41 to the C~ty of Everglades; rest areas Including signing for those areas; and a board- walk for a total of $238,000. He noted that the Board previously reviewed and approved these items, based upon the in-kind funding of $55,000 and assisting In the construction of the sidewalk. Mr. Archibald stated that most of those facilities will be county operated and county maintained and staff recommends that the proposed grant application remain in place. Mr. Archibald referred to and explained the three options as pro- vtded in the executive summary. Commissioner Constantine remarked that this is a good project, but pointed out the County does not have adequate funding to provide bike paths ~n the heavily populated areas of North Nap/es, Golden Gate and East Naples. Commissioner Matthews stated that this project has not been through the cycle, noting that the grant application is part of the process, Itself. She cited that the County needs to sign on to the Page 16 June 7, 1994 probability Indicating an Interest in filing the grant and willing to provide $23,000 If the grant Is awarded but not allocating any funds at this time. Mr. Archibald explained if the grant is accepted, this will not occur in the grant cycle this year or next year, but most likely In 1995/96. Commissioner Matthews revealed that there is more than adequate time to budget the $23,000. She affirmed that there is the oppor- tunity for the federal government to provide $215,000 worth of Impro- vements for which the county will pay $23,000. Commissioner Norris recalled that the Board has recently asked the citizens of various communities to improve the bikepaths in their areas through the use of MSTU's. He remarked that the total county budget for bikepaths is approximately $75,000 per year, and noted it Is not fair to ask other segments of the county to fund their own bike paths through MSTU's and to fund the requested project directly from the county budget. Comateaioner Norris ~oved, to approve Option #1, as reflected in the ~e~tlve Summary. In response to Commissioner Volpe, MPO Coordinator Perry advised that the deadllne for submitting the application was four days ago, however, because of the nature of the question which was raised prior to the deadline dealing with the issue of In-kind service versus hard cash, an extension was granted. Mr. Perry explained that the applications currently being accepted, relate to new money coming Into the work program In 1999. He confirmed that the money being applied at this time for is typi- cally five years away, however, the MPO has the ability to prioritize this project which could be funded prior to 1999. Commissioner Saunders divulged that It does seem unfair to tell one part of the community that they have to establish an MSTU to create funding sources for a bike path, but in another community indi- cate a different method. He remarked when there is the opportunity to Page 17 June 7, 1994 develop a very important community asset with 90~ of the funding from the federal or state government for that purpose, it clearly points out that the policy relating to the other bike paths is somewhat flawed. Me cited that the policy needs to be evaluated with regard to funding for the construction of b~ke paths in other communit~es. He revealed that he is opposed to the motion as presented, but does sup- port Option #2 as the preferred alternative. Commissioner Volpe stated if there Is the opportunity to consider this pro~ect next year, the big picture should be looked at. He Indi- cated he is content to let this project get Into the cycle next year. The following persons spoke with regard to this item: Mike Conway Bill Neron Justyna Ford Commissioner Volpe seconded the motion. Commissioner Saunders pointed out the benefit of the logic of taking advantage of the 90~ federal funding available. Commissioner Matthews concurred, and cited that the project needs to move forward. Upon call for the question, the motion carried 3/2 (Contssioner Saunders and Conisatoner Matthews opposed). ,es Recess: 12:10 PM - Reconvened: 12:45 PM At this tiN, Deputy Clerk Fernlay replaced Deputy Clerk Hoffman $'' (2794) Item t8D1 SHORT LIST OF PROPOSERS FOR UTILITY BILLING SOFTWARE ANALYSIS - APPROVED Ron Cook, Utilities Finance Director, stated that Income state- ments and/or financial analyses were not included in the proposal received. Commissioner Constantine indicated that the financial Information should be requested to assure that the selected company will be in business in two to five (2-5) years. Mr. Cook explained that the project is expected to take only six (6) weeks to two (2) months because the company will analyze the utility billing software system and make a recommendation. Page 18 June 7, 1994 In response to Commissioner Matthews, County Attorney Cuyler stated that financial information can be requested from the companies on the short list and the lowest responsive bidder not be awarded the bid based on an identifiable rational. Commissioner Norris moved, seconded by Co~missloner Saunders and carried unanimously, that the short list of proposers for Utility billing software analysis be approved and presentations scheduled. Mr. Cook stated that the three (3) vendors will be scheduled to make presentations to the Board for a final selection in the next few weeks. (S00S) Item~D2 DIRECTION ON PRIVATIZATION EFFORT FOR SELECTINa CONSULTANT - BIDS REJECTED AND REBID PROCESS TO BE COMPLETED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE Ron Cook, Utilities Finance Director, stated that only two (2) proposals were received on the privattzation of portions of the utility billing system. He explained that both firms are well qltalified but neither addressed the scope of services nor included a plan of action. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Cook explained that a pre- bid conference was held and the seven (7) companies in attendance seemed to understand what the County requirements were but evidently that was not the case. Commissioner Matthews indicated that 45 inquiries were sent to vendors and only two (2) responded which is difficult to understand. Mr. Cook stated that the Board can either re~ect both proposals, readdress the scope of services and rabid the RFP which will take approximately two (2} months or presentations can be scheduled for the two (2) companies who d~d respond and cla=~fication of requirements can be addressed during the presentation. Co~--Issionsr Saunders moved to reject all bids, Staff to redraft the ~pectftcattonm and move forward with the rabid process. Seconded by Co~naismioner Norris. Page 19 June ?, 1994 Commissioner Volpe stated that the Board w~11 be interviewing the consultant on the software for utility billing and this process of rabid will take two (2) months which will prohibit comparisons of the two (2) processes. He indicated that a shorter time frame needs to be established. Commissioner Constantine indicated that the RFP has already been developed so the process should be cut short by two to three (2-3) Coamissioner Volpe pointed out that the issue is important enough to accelerate the process as much as possible. Commissioner Saunders mmended his motion to include that the rabid process be co~pleted w~thin a aini~u~ mmount of tiaa. ConAeeioner Norris ~u~ended hie second. Upon cell for the question, the ~ot~on c~Tiedunani~usly. Mike McNees, Acting Utilities Administrator, pointed out that once the vendor for privattzation is selected, an evaluation will need to be completed as to whether the utility billing should continue in- house or whether privatization is best. Commissioner Matthews requested that she be supplied with a copy of the Request For Proposals which was sent to the vendors. (3~a) ItemS81! STATUS REPORT ON THE BOARD tS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTKM - PRESEHTED Skip Camp, Facilities Management Director, stated that a number of cost cutting items relative to the telephone system have been taken representing a savings of over $8,000 this year and anticipated savings next year are $41,006. Mr. Camp informed the Board that the analog telephone switch in the Administration Building is ten (10) years old and needs to be replaced with a digital owltch as are the other three (3) switches In the building. He Indicated that procurement options will be presented to the Board in the next few months for replacement of the switch. Tape #3 (20) Itel Page 20 June 7, 1994 DII~ECTION FOR FUNDING THE SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR PROGRAM - OCCUPATIONAL SURCHARGES NOT TO BE UTILIZED Bill Lorenz, Environmental Services Division Administrator, stated that on May 17, 1994, the County Attorneyrs Office advised the Board that the Water Pollution Control Fund 114 can legally be used to fund the Small Quantity Generator Hazardous Waste Program. Mr. Lorenz explained that the Tax Collector must return proofs of the Occupational License Notice of Renewals and Bill with or without the surcharge billing language thereon to the printer by June 8, 1994. Mr. Lorenz stated that pursuant to Board direction, St&ff con- tacted 36 counties and 32 conduct a Small Quantity Generator Program with funding sources being Occupational Surcharge (3 counties), Ad Valorem Taxes (including general fund, 12 counties), Landfill Tipping Fees (9 counties) and other (4 counties). He noted that the funding sources are for 28 counties as several counties have more than one funding source. Mr. Lorenz indicated that a resolution at a future date will be required if the funding source is changed and the contract with the Tax Collector will need to be terminated. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Lorenz indicated that the Water Pollution Control Fund was approved by the voters in 1984 and reaffirmed In 2988. Commissioner Constantine stated that the millage rate for the Water Pollution Control Funds will need to be Increased by .0242 mills if utilized to fund the Small Quantity Generator Program. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Lorenz staked that the program is a State mandated program and requires that Counties conduct verification visits to small quantity generators. He pointed out that four (4) counties currently do not have an active program. Commissioner Constantine indicated that the initial investiga- tions of potential locations is a five (5) year program. Commissioner Volpe requested that information be provided to the Board as to why four (4) counties are not participating in a State Page 21 June 7, 1994 mandated program. He Indicated that the Occupattona! Surcharge of $28.50 should not be utilized to fund the program as some of the funds collected are now subject to refunding. He stated that the roll and responsibilities in the program of the Independent Fire Control and Rescue Districts is not clear. Commissioner Constantine stated that the manner in which the program is funded now is certainly unfair since a business owner may pay the surcharge for five (5} years before being Investigated and then may find out that participation was not necessary. Mr. Lorenz stated that at the Budget Workshop scheduled for June 20, 1994, Staff will present more Information regardJng the program and funding thereof. Co~mtesioner Volpe moved, seconded by Co~eatoner Norris and carried unanimously, that the Occupational Surcharge not be utilized for funding of the S~all Quantity Generator Program. Item ~G2 - Continued to June 14, 1994 ~eeting (29?) Item FINDINGS OF THE ANNUAL IMPACT FEE REVIEW AS PREPARED BY INDIVIDUAL COUNTY FUND MANAGERS - STAFF TO R~EVALUATE AND UPDATE ORDINANCES= HENDERSON, YOUNG TO BE USED AS CONSULTANTS IF NECESSARY; ALL FUNDS EXPENDED TO BE APPROVED BY THE BOARD AND MONTHLY UPDATES OF PROGRESS OF ORDINANCE REVIEW TO BE PROVIDED Bill Hatgert, Assistant County Manager, stated that this Item is being presented as a result of the public hearing for the Land Development Code. He indicated that Staff is requesting authorization to ~ssue a Request For Proposals for consulting services to formaltze the impact fee study which requires updating. Commissioner Constantine indicated that Staff has the expertise to perform the calculations necessary to update the ordinances, I.e. how much has been collected, how much will be collected, projected growth rates, etc. Mr. Hargett stated that Staff can perform the calculations but the total review is a time consuming Job and at /east three (3) consulting firms were utilized to establish the entire impact fee Page 22 June 7, 1994 methodology. Commissioner Constantine pointed out that the Impact Fee Review Summary contained in the Executive Summary indicates that the County ks charging more than the necessary calculated amount in a number of areas. Mr. Hatgert pointed out that the calculations listed are the preliminary figures compiled two (2) to three (3) years ago and ficant changes in the number and the resulting fees have taken place. He stated that the figures indicate the need for a comprehensive evaluation of the impact fees. Commiss~oner Saunders pointed out that the consultants were necessary when developing the methodology for each of the impact fee ordinances but now the recalculattons utilizing that methodology should be handled by Staff. Mr. Hatgert stated that the potential exists that the methodology for determining the impact fees may need reviewing but Staff is capable of updating the methodology if necessary. In response to Commissioner Saunders, County Attorney Cuyler recommended that a consultant be hired to review the impact fee ordi- nances because impact fees can be utilized to cover the cost of the study and a comprehensive review of the ordinances has not been accomplished since the impact fees were effected. He explained that the impact fees are an important revenue source to the County and Justifications for increasing or decreasing should come from persons who perform this type service on a regular basis and who can also act as an expert witness should the County get challenged. Commissioner Constantine suggested hiring a consultant to verify what the County has accomplished if challenged. Mr. Cuyler indicated that there is no problem in hiring a con- sultant to verify Staff decisions as long as the consultant agrees to those decisions. Commissioner Matthews pointed out that the methodology may be incorrect in come cases because the variations are too large. She Page 23 June 7, 2994 pointed out that computer software should be available for updating impact fees and if not, Staff should be capable of developing a computer program for utilization with the impact fee program. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Cuyler explained that the updating of the impact fee ordinances is a maintenance function which will give you the maximum figure you can legally charge but because of the large revenues generated and because this is the first updating process, a consultant will better serve the County. Commissioner Volpe stated that a large amount of funds expended Initially was for data collection so the cost for the review should be significantly less. County Manager Dotrill stated that discrepancy in the EMS fund may not be related to the methodology but could be because of the lack of models available to utilize. He explained that a detailed cost accounting for trip and transport activity during a test period was conducted but actual data is now available to assist in recalculattng figures. Mr. Dotrill indicated that a letter of opinion based on County internal source data and calculations could be obtained from a consultant. Commissioner Volpe stated that additional Staff work can be accomplished between now and the issuance of an RFP for a consultant which would indicate where expertise is required. Mr. Dotrill pointed out that the impact fee methodology and formula for roads needs reviewing because the original ordinance was structured wherein if additional or alternative revenues were available, those monies would be applied as a credit against the road impact fee. He explained that the new local option gas tax will affect the road ~mpact fee ~ssue. B~11 Barton spoke on this Item. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Barton stated that the review and updating of the Impact fee ordinances will require a team effort and the Economic Development Council is willing to volunteer and ~s interested in becoming involved in the process. He stated that Page 24 June 7, 1994 on the County Staff, Mr. Yonkosky is good with figures and Mr. Hargett has a good understanding of impact fees. Commissioner Volpe stated that a team needs to be assembled in a short period of time because impact fees are a time sensitive issue. Mr. Dotrill indicated that a team can be assembled in several weeks but he cannot guarantee that this issue is more important than present projects. He suggested that a Request For Proposal providing a large scope of services so that the County can select a full audit, accounting and update review or Just a letter of opinion. Commissioner Volpe questioned what the approach will be if the project is to be completed in-house? Mr. Dotrill responded that a project manager or responsible party from each of the four {4) divisions that are leveling impact fees would be assigned to perform the calculations, who would present find- ings and recommendations to the budget office and/or Mr. Yonkosky prior to appearing as an agenda Item for the Board of County Commissioners recommendations for amending the ordinances. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Cuyler indicated that he would prefer to review the RFP from consultants as to what services they could perform and what assurances they would provide with Staff performing most of the work. Commissioner Norris stated that the issue is whether or not the methodology needs reassessing. He explained that Staff can simply update the figures if the methodology ie correct with a letter of opinion from a consultant, and if the methodology seems inappropriate, the consultant can address the problem. Mr. Hatgert indicated that validation of the existing methodo- logy is necessary to provide the Board with assurance that the intent of the ordinances has been achieved. Mr. Barton stated that a consultant should be told that the County likes the ordinances as written and request that only fatal flaws be pointed out or the impact fee process in Collier County will be reinvented. Page 25 June 7, 1994 Mr. Cuyler stated that he recommended the RFP to allow flexi- bility but consideration should be given to consulting Henderson, Young and Company if necessary since they performed much of the work on the original ordinances. Commissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Constantine and carried unanimously, that Staff perform as much of the resvalua- tion of the i~q~act fee ordinances as practical; if review by outside consultants are necessary, Mr. Cuyler has authority to contact the fir~ of Benderson, Young and Company; every dollar to be spent must be approved by the Board of County Commissioners; and monthly reports and updates on the review process to be presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Item~2 ~0Ol~rOATIO~ ~EAT BID #94-2179 FO~ BI A~ARDED - STAFF TO FEESENT ALTERNATIVES FOR SCALED DOWN FACILITIES AND BREAKDOWN OF COSTS PER ELEMENT OF THE PROJECT Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects Management Director, stated that the Immokalee Recreation Center Project was advertised for bid on March 1, 1994 with the bid opening on March 30, 1994. He explained that the low bidder was D.E. Murphy Constructors, Inc. with a base bid of $2,429,000 with add alternates equaling $365,750 for a total project bid of $2,794,750 which is within the budgeted/projected cost of the project. Mr. Conrecode indicated that costs outside the construction contract, i.e., office furniture, telephones, electrical service, building/pool equipment and contingency allowances, total $399,882. Mr. Conrecode stated that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed the bids on May 25, 1994 and recommended that all add alter- nates except the racquetball courts be awarded for a total contract of $2,667,750. Mr. Conrecode explained that the total project cost is $3,194,632 for which there is a current available budget of $2,681,436 in Funds 306 and 345. He stated that the budget will fund the base bid, two Page 26 June 7, 1994 thirds (2/3) of the items required outside the construction contract and no add alternates. Mr. Conrecode ~emarked that at a minimum, Staff is recommending additional funding be made available for the remaining noncontract costs of $159,446 from the existing Reserves of the Regional Park Impact Fee Fund 306. Mr. Conrecode pointed out that funding for the additional add alternates, i.e. activity pool ($162,900), slide ($46,000), pool security ($17,850), and racquetball courts ($127,000), totaling $353,750, need to be funded ut~lizing one (1} of the three (3) options outlined in the Executive Summary. Mr. Conrecode stated that the estimated operating cost for the aquatic facility portion of the project is $430,000 if open year round with decreasing amounts if open only portions of the year and the recreation center operational cost Is approximately $265,000. Mr. Conrecode pointed out that Staff is requesting authorization for the Chairman to execute the construction agreement following attorney review with D.E. Murphy Constructors, Inc. in the amount of $2,241,000 and authorize the budget amendment in the amount of $159,446. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conrecode stated that the Golden Gate Aquatic Facility cost $3.5 million. County Manager Dotrill pointed out that the Golden Gate facility was intended to serve approximately 100,000 residents and was origi- nally planned to have an Olympic size pool which was downsized and the Immokalee facility was ~ntended to serve a population of approximately 20,000 residents. Commissioner Volpe stated that $3.5 million was spent to serve a population in Golden Gate of 100,000 as compared to $3.2 million pro- posed to be spent to serve a population of 20,000 in Immokalee and the Immokalee facility may not operate on a year round basis. Mr. Dotrill indicated that the size and scope of the pool as designed for the Immokalee facility took into account that lack of pools and water recreational facilities in the area which may generate ~age 27 June 7, 1994 a higher proportionate use. He stated that the pool is scheduled to be opened for spring break 1995 becauso the more children utilizing the facility initially, the more success the facility will experience in the future. Mr. Dotrill explained that the Immokalee project includes the renovation of an old gym~asium as well as providing locker room facilities and is more than Just the construction of a pool. In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Dotrill indicated that possibly funds can be utilized for the facility from the Empowerment Zone Grant if awarded to Immokalee. Commissioner Matthews stated that if the $40,000,000 Empowerment Zone Grant is awarded to the Immokalee area, the funds will be spread over a ten (10} year period. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Conracode indicated that the project recommended by Staff requires transfer of reserves which represents the "pay as we go" methodology but the additional add alternates are unfunded and would require borrowing if the Board de- cides to go forward with those items. Commissioner Volpe stated that he needs additional information as to why ad valorem taxes coming from the urban area will be spent for this type amenity for the pleasure of 20,000 people. He indicated that possibly the pool can be scaled down and soccer f~elds provided where the concentration of the population is currently. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Tom Olliff, Public Services Administrator, stated that the Comprehensive Plan provides for a com- munity size pool facility in Immokalee. Commissioner Saunders stated that the Board determined that there is a substantial need for this type facility in Immokalee and thereby made provisions for same in the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Volpe explained that the aquatic facility for Immokalee is included in the Comprehensive Plan but with the current commitments made by the Board, the Comprehensive Plan should be re- visited for prioritizing our dollars currently. Page 28 June ?, 1994 In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Olllff Indicated that between 30 percent and 40 percent of the expenses to operate the Golden Gate facility are covered by use revenues. Commissioner Matthews pointed out that the potential exists that approximately $200,000 will be recovered out of the $665,000 total facility operating costs if opened year round. She stated that the activity pool should be included in the Immokalee facility because of the revenue generated at the Golden Gate facility by the activity pool. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that maybe an activity pool is needed In Immokalee now and the SO mete= pool with a small diving area can be constructed at a later date. Commissioner Norris stated that the need in Immokalee can be addressed by having Staff provide the Board with a revised proposal for an aquatic facility which is not as expensive. Mr. Dotrill stated that certain basic site work, the pump house and chlorine chambers will need to be constructed no matter how down- sized the project becomes. The following persons spoke on this item: Joseph Zaks Reverend Bruce Pray Co~ee~oner Matthew~ ~oved to approve the construction of the pool, renuw~t~on of the field h~use and the activity pool to be ~ncluded. Seconded by Coatestoner Saunders. Commissioner Saunders pointed out that this facility w~11 provide recreational activity for small children, parents and potential ~uve- n~le offenders ~n the community. Commissioner Volpe Indicated that the funding source needs to be Identified. Commise~oner Matthews recommended that the funds be borrowed from the General Fund Reserves against future Regional Park tmpac= fees. Commissioner Constantine voiced concerns regarding the assumption of population use of such a facility and the ~ack of population base Page 29 June 7, 1994 He indicated that he to provide the same needs as in the urban area. is willing to support a scaled down project. Tape ,4 In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Olliff stated that the middle school renovations will cost approximately $1.5 million. Commissioner Matthews pointed out that the pool for the Immokalee facility will cost $1.7 million as opposed to $2.5 million for the Golden Gate facility. Upon cal! for the question, the motion failed 2/3 (Co~isstonera Volpe, Con~tantine and Norris opposed). Commissioner Constantine requested that Staff bring back alter- natives for scaled down project and a breakdown of costs per element of the project and report back sometime in August. He pointed out that no one is suggesting that recreational facilities are not needed in Immokalee. Commissioner Volpe suggested that a shared use agreement with the school board should be investigated for the pool and other amenities. Commissioner Constantine pointed out that the cost to operate and availability of school buses to transport students is prohibitive. Commissioner Matthews indicated that the three (3) local Immokalee schools are very close to the proposed facility. It wa~ the consensus of the Board to have Staff present alter- natlve~ for a ecaled down project and a breakdown of costa per element of the project. Commissioner Volpe stated that Staff should also investigate gym- nasium facilities that the school board might make available. Commissioner Constantine pointed out that he and Mr. Derrill are scheduled to meet with the Superintendent and Chairman of the School Board and the City of Naples within the next two (2) weeks and the sharing of facilities can be discussed at that time. Mr. Derrill indicated that a incremental cost breakdown should be available for Board review sometime in July. · e$ Raceseed: 2:40 P.M. - Reconvened: 2:55 P.M. at w~lich time Deputy Clerk Barbiretti replaced Deputy Clerk Fernlay ~e~ Page 30 June 7, 1994 (330) Xteu~SH3 FINANCE COJ~iITTKK RECOMMENDATION TO PROCEKD WITH CURRKNT REFUNDINO OF SERIES 1986 CAPITAL INPROIrEMENT REVENUE BONDS - APPROVED Assistant County Manager Hatgert stated that this Item Is a request to proceed with current refunding of Series 1986 Capital Improvement Revenue Bonds. He reported that these are originally 1982 Bonds that had advanced refunding in 1985 and 1986. He said that the current refunding is 90 days either side of October 1, 1994. He pre- sented the Board with a Information sheet regarding competitive bidding and a interest curve provided by the financial advisors. (Copy not provided to Clerk's Office). He said that proposed refunding will recognize a future value savings of between three and four million dollars. Commissioner Matthews remarked that some bonds were refunded three months ago when the market was better. She asked why this bond did not come forward with the other group? Mr. Hatgert replied that changes in the law prevented the Inclu- sion. He explained that the previous refundings were advanced refun- dings. He said a advanced refunding could not be done on this issue. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Hatgert confirmed that the last refunding was a negotiated sale. In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Hatgert stated that the current coupon rate for this bond is approximately ?~. In answer to Commissioner Norris, John Yonkosky, Assistant to the County Manager, stated that this Issue has two call dates left; October 1, 1994 and October 1, 1995, however, the payments on the debt service stretches over a period of time. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Yonkosky confirmed that the bonds mature in 2012. He said that Staff has always known that there is a large potential savings in refunding this Issue but the two advanced refundings that have occurred restricted the County from having another advanced refunding. Page 31 June ?, 1994 Mr. Hargett stated that the interest rate curve that has been pro- vided affirms that in this case the County would be better off with a negotiated sale. Co~iamloner Norris moved, seconded by Conissioner Mmtthe~ to anth~r~izl Staff to proceed with the current refunding of the Series 19S6 Capital I~rove~ent Revenue ~nds ~d utilization of the nets- Mr. Har~et~ stated that a letter will be sent to the five members of the eelllng group to sol~clt thelr lnterest and select two managers for this issue. ~ call for the ~estlon, the motlon carfled 4/0 (Co~lseloner Sanders B~D ~O. 94-2~06, FOR BO~LD~NO "H~ ~RD ~00R ~S~0~ - A~KD TO Commissioner Constantine stated that he requested this item be removed from the consent agenda but the question he had has been resolved. Con. Assigner Constantine moved, seconded by Contseloner Norris to a~eard Bid No. 94-2196 to Surety Conerection Co~y In the ~t of 8286, ~00.00. ~ Call for the ~eet~on, the .orton carried 4/0 (Co~s~oner S~ers ~t }. (e4e) D~~' A~~ ~ES P~SU~ TO CO~T ORDER ~ ~0V~ OF ~E CO~'~ A~~ ~E~ ~ ~E CASE OF COLLIER CO~ V. H~R, ~T ~, C~E NO. 90-2912-CA-01-~B, ~I~ DO~IN C~E FOR ~ ~E SIDLE T~ING OF 20 A~S FOR THE NORTH C0~ WATER ~~ PL~ SITE - ~~D County Attorney Cuyler stated that this item is in reference to Collier County rs. Hautmaker which is a large, eminent domain case. He noted that the Executive Summary denotes the history of the case. He said that there was an appeal and the County was ordered to deposit Page 32 June 7, ~994 $340,000.00 which was the appraised value of the site. He stated that the Jury ultimately entered a verdict for $305,000.00 and a fine for severance damages for $225,000.00 and $0 for proximity damages. He said that the Board authorized the County to file an appeal of the verdict. He commented that the Defendants at the same time filed a cross appeal for $1,000,000.00. He said that the County was unsuc- cessful In the appeal and the Defendants were also unsuccessful. He explained that this approval relates only to Defense Attorney fees which amount to $235,257.50 and is required by State Statute to be paid. He added that this ltem also requests the authorization of payment in the amount of $24,259.00 for the County's eminent domain counsel tn this case and the budget amendment for this project. Commissioner Norris ~oved, seconded b,/ Coatestoner Volpe and carried ~t~ly, to approve Staff recouendatton. G~ ~ ~INIS~TI~ ACCO~ - P~SE~ ACCO~ TO ~IN STA~S QUO~ ~ A~~ TO D~LOP ~ RESOL~ION EST~LISHING GUIDELI~S ~R~ACCO~ Commissioner Saunders explained that he received a letter from the Clerk of Courts, Dwight Brock, concerning the accounting of the General and Administrative Fund. He said that the County Manager's Office has s~gnature authority on this account and Mr. Brock has indi- cated that he will not accept responsibility for preparing a budget, having spending authority and managing a cost center that employees other than the Clerk's employees have spending authority on. Commissioner Saunders stated that Mr. Brock's position is that he is willing to handle this account, but if he is to handle it he wishes to have sole signature authority on the account. He said if the County Manager'a Office is to have s~gnature authority he wishes to turn over the entire account to the County Manager's Office. County Manager Dotrill said that there are two issues that preci- pitated this. He said that he has met with Mr. Brock and resolved the issues but requested direct~on from the Board. He said that for a Page 33 June 7, 1994 number of years shared purchasing/expenditure authority has existed. He said that he supports the Clerk's internal control and pre-audit authority, but there may be more than one cost center involved. He said that this is a "catch all" cost center where extraordinary costs are applied. He gave examples of the costs. He said that this is a Board fund, but neither the Chairman nor anyone on the Board Staff has spending authority. Mr. Dotrill said that the other issue is the preparation of the budget. He said that historically Mr. Yonkosky prepared the budget for this fund. He stated that he asked Mr. Yonkosky to prepare it again. He said that Mr. Brock Informed him that he would prepare the budget. He suggested that the Board keep the fund and segregate those expense line items that are expenses incurred by the Board, County Attorney or County Manager. He suggested that all the other expenses, Including the salary of an employee to the Clerk who works in Everglades City, be maintained by the Clerk of Courts. Dwight Brock etated that this is a Board fund. He said that the employee In Everglades City performs no services for the Clerk of Courts. Mr. Brock stated that he has budgeted for this year's expenditures but did not Include any discretionary funds for the County Manager. He said that the budget includes the salary and costs for the Everglades City employee, auditing expenses of the outside auditor, recordation of DR219 Documents, and advertising Board meetings. He advised that crossing agency lines with spending authority creates problems. County Manager Dotrill stated that another issue is the definition of discretionary funding. He stated that he and Mr. Brock suggest that the Ordinance be repealed and develop a separate Resolution of purchases defined as discretionary purchases that would require the approval of the County Manager and would have an annual estimate of appropriations for those purchases. Mr. Brock stated that he agreed with the concept. He said that it Page 34 June 7, 1994 Is the Clerk's legal responsibility to determine whether or not expen- ditures are legal or whether they serve a public purpose. He suggested that the Board of County Commissioners adopt a Resolution approving any expenditures that fall into the "grey area" of whether or not they serve a public purpose. Co~issioner Saunders eoved, seconded by Couissioner Matthew~ to cont.tnue the ~tntenance of the present account by the Clerk'e Office ~nd direct Staff to develop a Resolution establishing guidelines and COetl for a asparete account. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brock stated that the employee in Everglades City handles a number of functions for the Board, Tax Collector and Tax Assessor. He said that it was a general governmental function that this person is providing. County Manager Dotrill confirmed that the Intent of the Issue is to establish a separate cost center in order to satisfy the Clerk with annual estimates of what m~ght be spent for special programs or public service programs. Upon call for the question, the ~otion carried 5/0. Ite~#lOC VACANCY DECLARED ON THE PRIVATIZATION PLUS TASK FORCE - APPROVED Commissioner Norris eoved, seconded by Couiesioner Matthews and carried unanimously, that a vacancy be declared on the Privatizatton Plu~ Ta~k Force. County Attorney Cuyler stated that he will prepare a Resolution for th~s item. (224S) It~a,lOD OFFICE/M~TING SPACE FOR THE ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND - CHAIl~MAN AUTHORIZED TO CONTACT APPROPRIATE PARTIES Commissioner Constantine stated that he would forward correspon- dence to the appropriate parties in an attempt to assist the Collier County Association for the Blind in obtaining office space. Page 35 June 7, ·nd ¢~rrie~ ~i~ly, tha~ the Ch~i~ Ase~iation for the Blind in obtaining office apace. /tea t10~ Commissioner Constantine reported that the Department of Community Affairs is requesting to delete language from the Community Services Block Grant award agreement. He said that the County Attorney has advised that deleted language would not make a substantial difference to the agreement. Coamtsstonar Saundars ~oved, seconded by Co~-issionar Norris and carried unan/~nasl¥, to approve the ~en~ent to the Comity (~00) I~910F ~ ~IN TI~ ~R I~TE NOS. 68063 ~ 549T4 - ~O~D Commissioner Constantine stated that Extra Gain Time t$ usually placed on the consent agenda each week. He said that there is a distinction between Gain Time and Extra Gain Time. He explained that the Board has no discretion regarding Gain Time, however, Extra Gain Time for prisoners in the Jail system is completely at the Boards' discretion according to an Ordinance adopted in 1976. He suggested that the Ordinance be reviewed to see what criteria is used. He stated that he is uncomfortable approving Gain Time unless he knows who the person is and what their offense is. Administrative Assistant to the Board F/leon stated that the information is available in the Board Office and is included in the Miscellaneous Correspondence. Commissioner Volpe stated that the Sheriff makes a recommendation based upon Board policy. Page 36 June 7, 1994 County Manager Dorri11 stated that State Statute puts the burden for corrections on the Board of County Commissioners. It was the consensus of the Board to direct the County Attorney to review the criteria of Ordinance 76-24 and report to Board at a future meeting. Co~mtestoner Norris moved, seconded by Co~aisstonsr Saunders to approve l~xtra Gain Time for In.ate Nos. 68063 ~d 549T4. ~ call for the ~estton, the ~otton carried 4/1 (Co~ts~1oner 0~I~ 94-~0 ~ ~IRG COLLIER CO~ ORDIR~C~ NO. 91-95, ~~, ~TIRG P~LIC ~HICL~S FOR HI~ - ~D Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on May 5, 1994 as evidenced by Affidavit of Pub//cation filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Tom Bartoe, Code Compliance Supervisor, stated that major improve- ments to Ordinance 91-99 are listed in the Executive Summary. He referred to page 3, section L, of the proposed Ordinance. He requested that the last sentence be changed to read "Taxicabs which are not operated by a certificate holder are prohibited from being subcontracted." He said that the reason for this is that no taxicabs could be subcontracted, the amendment would permit license holders to be able to subcontract their vehicles. He requested that a t~pographical error on page 12, paragraph 13, be corrected to read "air conditioning and heating system". He stated that Staff recom- mends approval of the Ordinance. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Bartoe confirmed that the Ordinance had been reviewed and approved by the Public Vehicle Advisory Committee. Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing. Commissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthe~e~ to approve the Ordinance as ~mendad in addition to the changes outlined. 59' Page 37 $une ?. ~994 Upon call for the question. the ~otlon carried 4/0 (Co~-. Volpe out), thereby adopting Ordinance No. 94-30 and entered Into Ordinance Book 66. (1547) It~#13A2 R~SOLUTION 94-402 ~ PETITION CU-94-3, MR. VICTOR E. DEKONSCHIN, ~PRE~ENTING TH~ UNITED CHURCH OF MARC0 ISLAND ~QUNSTING CONDITIONAL USE 2 OF TH~ RSF-3 AND RSF-4 ZONING DISTRICTS TO ALLOW FOR AN EXPANSION OF TH~ EXISTING CHURCH USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHNEST CORNER OF N. BARFIELD DRIV~ AND BRIARWOOD COURT - ADOPTED SUBJECT TO CCP~"$ STIPULATIONS AND THE ADDITIONAL CONDITION OF CLOSING BOTH RO~LANO TERRACE EXITS Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on May 8, 1994 as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Each of the Commissioners indicated that they had not received any ex-parte communications. Commissioner Constantine swore in members of the audience that would speak on this petition. Planner Bellows stated that the petitioner would like to construct a new 1,100 sq. f~. sanctuary and described the location of the pro- perty. He said that the proposed sanctuary will seat 540 members and would require 231 parking spaces. He said that the petitioner's s~te plan ~ndtcates that 232 parking spaces be provided. He explained that in order to provide space for the required parking the petitioner vacated Romano Terrace last year. Planner Bellows stated that the church has been in existence for 24 years. Mr. Bellows explained that the trips generated by the proposed sanctuary will not lower the Level of Service on North Barfield Drive or have an adverse affect on the utilities. He said that the petition is consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Planner Bellows stated that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPO) heard th~s petition on May 5, 1994. He said that the CCPC had determined that the petition satisfies the Land Development Code cri- Teria. He stated that the CCPC recommends approval subject to Staff ,00K 000P'~'E 5~ Page 38 June ?, 1994 stiI~ulattons. Planner Bellows reported that Staff has received several telephone calls and two letters in opposition. He stated that Staff has received a petition opposing the proposed sanctuary signed by 22 resi- dents. Planner Bellows stated that the minutes from last year's vacation hearing indicate that the lot south of Romano Terrace, including lot 19, would only be used for residential purposes. He reported that the Resolution adopting the vacation only states that the lots would not be used for parking. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Planner Bellows confirmed that this is the same application that appeared before the Board as the vacation application. He added that the footprint of the building may have changed but the concept is the same. Attorney David Brunet stated that he is on the planning committee for the church. He stated that the impact of this project has not changed from the vacation application. He said that the petitioner agrees with Staff and the CCPC in that the petition is consistent with the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code. He requested that the Board limit this hearing to the criteria listed in the Executive Summary. In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Brunet stated that one of the vacant lots had been sold and others are still for sale. Mr. Brunet replied that he has difficulty determining the term "use". He said that it is his interpretation that if Lot l, Block 81, is used for water retention it is really not being used. He said that the Resolution was adopted and this petition is consistent with the Resolution. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Planner Bellows stated that he had contacted the Transportation Department and they stated that the intent of the vacation was to use the lot for water retention. V~ctor DeKonschin, representing the United Church of Marco Island, described the proposed sanctuary using an aerial drawing of the site. Page June ?, 1994 He said that the amount of green space has been increased around the building and Lot 19 will be retained for water management. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. DeKonschin replied that the parking area will have low leve! illumination that is directed away from the streets. He said that height of the poles will be 16 feet maximum. In response to Comm~ssioner Volpe, Mr. DeKonschin stated that the landscape buffer will be 8 feet high with 80~ opacity and will consist of trees and shrubs. The following people spoke on the subject: Robert A. Giunta Linda L. Surowiak Dorothy Harkness Lee Harkhess Arthur Oberg Rev. Elizabth Beams Howe Katherine G. Prout Tape ~5 Mr. Brunet stated that he would like to incorporate into this record the record of the meeting of the May 18, 1993, hearing on the vacation of Romano Terrace. He said that no competent testimony has been given opposing this project. He stated that the petitioner sup- ports Staff analysis. Commissioner Constantine closed the public hearing. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. DeKonschin stated that the proposed facility is approximately 2,000 sq. ft. larger than the faci- lity proposed last year because it had not been designed yet. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. DeKonschin confirmed that 26 additional parking spaces will be paved. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. DeKon$chin replied that all traffic will exit onto Briarwood Court. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Mulhere, Acting Current Planning Manager, stated that when the existing church was built it was a permitted use and would be retained as a permitted use in its current function. He said that today if a church were to be constructed on the same site the Code would require a conditional use, therefore the expansion requires a conditional use. Page 40 June ?, 1994 Commissioner Volpe remarked that the hours of operation listed in the Executive Summary are 9 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. on Sunday and 8 A.M. to 5 P.M. for the weekdays. He asked if the hours would be limited to Just these times? Mr. Mulhere stated that unless the hours are contained in the Agreement Sheet they would not be limited. Mr. Bellows stated that the hours listed in the Executive Summary are the primary hours of operation. Commissioner Matthews questioned whether church related activities beyond the hours listed would make a difference on the impact to the area? Mr. Mulhere stated that church related activities are not viewed as intensifying the impact beyond what the traditional church would have. Commissioner Matthews remarked that the sanctuary size is being Increased by 2/3. She asked if this increase will affect the traffic control impact? Planner Bellows stated that the level of service calculations per- formed by Staff indicate that the difference between the existing church and the proposed church will not effect Barfield Drive or any other road in the area. Commissioner Matthews stated that she did not understand how the traffic in the area would not be affected by such a great Increase in the size of the sanctuary. Planner Bellows pointed out that the Code allows for a reduction in parking standards for churches. mss Deputy Clerk Hoffman replaced Deputy Clerk Barbtrett! Commissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Conisstonsr Norris to mppro~ Petition CU-94-3, based on the testimony presented from both sides, wtt~t ~ restrictions on the hours of operation and subject to st~ff ~nd the Collier County Planning Co~mtsston~s stipulations. A discussion ensued with regard to the security lighting. 57 Page 41 June 7, 1994 Co~lesioner Saunders a~ended hie motion to ensure that there would be adequate shielding of the light fixtures to prevent any glare off site. Coulesloner Norris concurred with the a~end~ent. Commissioner Volpe voiced concerns with regard to the number of access points from the parking lot. He suggested that there may be a way to accommodate the residents by allowing access only to North Barfield Drive, except for the grassy parking, where exiting would be allowed on the small portion of Briarwood. He pointed out that he is uncomfortable with the size of the facility since it is being increased by 2/3. Commissioner Saunders remarked that he does not see any benefit to limiting the access of the facility to North Barfield Drive since there will be a considerable amount of traffic attempting to exit from one driveway. With regard to limiting the size of the facility, Commissioner Saunders stated that he is not persuaded that the size of the facility will create any problems. Upon call for the q~estton, the motion failed 3/2 (Co~missionsr Volpe mnd Commissioner Matthews opposed). Commissioner Volpe moved, to approve Petition CU-94-3, subject to the stipulations in the Initial motion, but restricting the vehtcul&r accsu points on Briarwood Court and Barbados Court. ~he motion failed for lack of a second. Commissioner Norris ~oved, seconded by Cowriestoner Saunders to approv~ Petition CU-94-3, subject to the Planning Couteelon's raco~ex~dation and stipulations, and adopting the ftndtn~ as pre- viousif etated. At this time a discussion was held with regard to the Impact upon the residences by allowing access from the church grounds to Barbados and Briarwood. Commissioner Volpe remarked that he could support the motion if what used to be Romano Terrace Is closed off. The Petitioner voiced no objection to closing Romano Terrace at Page 42 June ?, 1994 both ende. CottA#loner Norris amended his ~otlon to reflect that each end of Ro~no T~-rac~ will b~ blocked off. Co~l~toner Sa~der~ con~rred with ~ ~t ~d u~n call for the ~estton, the ~otton carried Page 43 (32 o) Itn #14 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COMMUNICATIONS June 7, 1994 County Manager Derrill advised that the Governor's Office has scheduled a Hurricane Preparedness scenario for the State of Florida. He indicated that this is a two day mock drill and exercise. He suggested that the Board participate and hold a session as part of the hurricane exercise on Thursday, June 16. He remarked that the amount of time for participation will be approximately 1-1/2 hours. The Board concurred to partic/pate in the mock dr/11 on the second day of the exercise on June 16, at 1:45 P.M. STAFF'S COMMUNICATIONS County Attorney Cuyler revealed that he Just received good news with regard to the mot/on for summary Judgment relative to the County and the Southfield Farms Case which is a multi-million dollar land use law suit against the County. He indlcated that the County has been successful in getting that case dismissed. · e, Cc~atestoner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and carried unanimously, that the following items under the consent agenda be approved and/or adopted: ''' Item ~16&1 RESOLUTION 94-371 RE AUTHORIZATION OF A 50~ WAIVER/50~ DEFERHAL OF ROAD, LIBRARY SYSTEM, PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, ~MERGENCY M~DICAL SERVICES SYSTEM, AND KDUCATIONAL FACILITIES SYSTEM IMPACT FEES FOR A ~ BEDROOM ROUSE TO BE BUILT BY PAUL AND CAROL A, DESHAZO IN GOLDEN ~AT~ ESTATES, SAID IMPACT FEES TO BE PAID FROM AFFORDABLE ROUSING TRUST FUND (291) See Pages Item gl6A2 RESOLUTION 94-3?2 RE RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF "GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 25, TRACT 111# See Page' Item #16A3 RESOLUTION 94-373 RK PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR TH~ FINAL PLAT OF "PELICAN BAY UNIT SEVENTEEN" 000PA~£ ~5 Page 44 June ?, 1994 See Page RESOLUTION 94-374 RE RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF "MOOR LAKE UNIT FIVe" AND GRAIF~ PRKLIWIRARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEW~I~ I~:~R~ - WITH STIPULATIORS Item #16A5 A~'~'~OVAL OF THE IWg~OKALEE AND MARCO ISLAND SMALL URBAN AREA BOUNDARY ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES FOR LELY RESORT, PHASE I-C (TRIANGLE BLVD.) - WITH STIPULATIONS NOTE: DOCUMENTS NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF 8/ 17/94 Item #16A7 ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES FOR MOON T~AKE, UNIT FIVE - WITH STIPULATIONS AS LISTED IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY NOTE: DOCUMENTS NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF 8/17/94 Item #16A8 - Moved to Item #8A6 Itet #16A9 I~X$OLUTION 94-375 lq~ PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPR0~S FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF 'LELY RESORT PHASE ONK-C' - WITH STIPULATIONS AS LISTED IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY See Page ~ ACCEPTANCE FOR WATER FACILITIES FOR VANDERBILT BEACH BATH HOUSE - WITH STIPULATIONS AS LISTED IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY See Page' ~ Item #Z6AII ACCEPTANCE FOR WATER FACILITIES FOR NORTH NAPLES - WITH STIPULATIONS AS LISTED IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY /twm#16A12 RESOLUTION 94-376 T~KOUGH RESOLUTION 94-397 RE AUTHORIZATION OF MAI~KRS OF ROAD IMPACT FEES, LIBRARY SYSTEM IMPACT FEES, PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITY IMPACT FEES, KIWKRGKNCY MEDICAL SERVICES SYSTEM IMPACT FEES, WATER IMPACT FEES, SEWER IMPACT FEES FOR 22 THREE BEDROOM HOUS!~B TO BE BUILT BY IMMOKALKE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, INC., IN COLLIER VILF-A(JK IN IMIROEALKE AND NAPLES MANOR SUBDIVISION AND TO FUND SAID WAIF~S FROM AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND, FUND (191} Page 45 Item #16A13 See Pages June 7, 1994 AUTHORIZATION OF THE AGREEMENT FOR WAIVER OF IMPACT FEES FOR 21 THREE BEDROOM HOUSES TO BE BUILT BY IMMOKALEE HABITAT FOR ~ITY, INC. IN COLLIER VILLAGE IN IMMOKALEE AND NAPLES MANOR SUBDIVISION AND TO FUND SAID #AIVKRS FROM AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND, FUND (191) Item ,26A14 ACCEPTANC~ FOR MATER AND SEWER FACILITIES FOR FALCON GLEN VILLAS, PHASE ONE - WITH STIPULATIONS AS LISTED IN THE EXECUTIVE ~ NOTE: DOCUMENTS NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF 8/]?/94 R~SOLUTION 94-398 RE PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADMAY DRAINAGE, WATER AND SRI~ER IMPROVeMIlleTS FOR THE FINAL PLAT OF #FALCONS GLEN VILLAS PHASE ONE' - WITH STIPULATIONS AS LISTED IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY See Pages Item RESOLUTION 94-399 RE REDUCTION OF THE EXISTING SPEED LIMIT FROM FORTY FIVE WILES ~ HOUR (45 MPH) TO THIRTY MILES PER HOUR (30MPH) IN THE VICINITY OF BRIDGE NO 030176 LOCATED ON CR 901 [VANDERBILT DR.) OVER BIG HORSE PASS, CREATE I FIVE (5) TON WEIGHT RESTRICTION FOR THIS BRIDGe, AND POST TRUCK DETOUR SIGNS AT CR 888 (WIGGINS PASS) AND 111TH AVE. NORTH Item ~18B2 See Page P~TITIONAV-94-007 RE QUITCLAIM DEED VACATING A PORTION OF A FIFTEEN FOOT (15~) UTILITT EASEMENT UNPLATTED, LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOt~NSHIP 49 SOUTh, RAN~E 25 EAST, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1597, PAGES 283 TBROUGH 288, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA See Pages ~q'"" ~ ~ Item ~16C1 APPROVJLL 0F GRANT ~OM ~K STATK 0F ~ORID& TO PROVIDK L~S ~R I~~, ~~KS ~ N~LKS S~R ~C~TION P~TICIP~S See Pages Item~16C2 BID ~4-2199 FOR PRINTING OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION LEISURE LINE BROCNUR~ - ANARDED TO AD-DESIGNS OF NAPLES, IN THE AMOUNT OF $47,280.00 Page 46 3une ?, 1994 AUTIIOKIZATION FOR THE WASTEWATER DIRECTOR TO SERVE AS AGENT FOR THE BOARD ~N TH~ PREPARATION AND PRESENTATION OF A VARIANCE PETITION Item#16D2 API~OVAL OF ASSESSMNNT DK~ FOR 1993 FOR HARDSHIP ASSISTANCE PROGRAM- IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,218.67 Item #16D3 APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT BET~EEN COLLIER E]F~ERFRISES REALTY GROUP, INC. AND COLLIER COUNTY FOR THE CONTINUED USE OF OFFICE SPACE UTILIZED BY THE UTILITIES DIVISION ON HORSESHOE DRIVE FOR S YEARS AT 87,110.28 PER HONTH AND $?,709.00 ANNUALLY FOR MAINTENANCE, REPAIRS, TAXES AND INSURANCE See Page Item ~16K1 ADDITION OF DOUGLAS S. MAITLAND, MAI, SRA, TO THE LIST OF PRK-Q~ALIFIED EMINKNT DOMAIN APPRAISERS Item ,16E2 BID ~94~-2197 FOR RE-ROOFING OF THE IMMOKALEE JAIL CENTER AWARDED TO CROMTIIER ROOFING AID SHEET METAL OF FLORIDA IN THE AMOUNT OF Item BID ~94-2184 FOR THE PURCHASE OF EXPENDABLE MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR THE D~PARTMKIFT OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES - AW~ED 0N A LI~ ~ LI~ ~IS ~ L~ BIDD~ APPROVAL OF CERTIFICATES OF CORP~ECTION TO THE 1991, 1992, 1993 AND 1994 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS, AUTHORIZATION OF CHAII~qAN TO SIGN THE CERTIFICATES ON BEHALF OF THE BCC, AND AUTHORIZE REFUNDS AS APPROPTtIATE Item ~16G2 See Pages APPROVAL OF MORE ORDER WITH AGNOLI, BARBER AND BRUNI)AGE, INC. UNDER THE CORRENT ANIt~AL PROFESSIONAL SKRVICES AGREEMENT FOR LAND SURVEYING SKR~CK~ FOR M~SCKLLANKOUS SURVEYING PROJECTS - NOT TO EXCEED $9,OOO.00 - ..5-// Item ~16N1 MAi~KR OF TH~ FORMAL BID PROCESS AND ANARD A SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT OF ANAT~T I~KFINITYTKLEPHONK SYSTEM FORT HE NEW NORTH NAPLES EMERGENCY SKlqVICES CKNTKR - IN THE AMOUNT OF $28,172.12 Page 47 June ?, 1994 Item #16H2 ~ECUTION OF ~UPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT MO. 2 TO THE CONSULTING SENVICES A~REE~]~T~TH ~R~IFER, INC. FOR COUNTY BARN ROAD - IN THE AMOUNT OF $?9,652.38 - FULL CONTRACT AMOUNT $409,551.92 See Pages ~5--/c~- ~-/'7 Ite~l #16H3 APPROVAL OF AGREEXENT WITH FLORIDA LIGHTNING PROTECTION, INC. FOR REVI~ OF THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM AT THE NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATME]IT PLANT AS A RESULT OF LIGHTNING DAMAGE IN THE AMOUNT OF $33,640 - AND DECLARE A VALID PUBLIC EMERGENCY AND WAIVE THE STATUTORY CONi~ETITIVE SELECTION AND NEGOTIATION PROCESS See Pages 5~ ~ -- ~ Item #16H4 - Thie Ite~ ham been deleted Item #1~$ - Thim Item has been deleted Ite~ #16H6 - M~wd to Item #8H4 Item #16H7 APPROVAL OF A WORK ORDER WITH WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC., UNDER THE CURRENT ANNUAL AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR PREPARATION OF THE UPDATE OF THE NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENT ROLL IN THE NAPLES PRODUCTION PARK MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING AND BENEFIT UNIT FOR TAX YEAR 1993-1994 - IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,000.00 Item,16H8 APPROVAL OF A N~)RK ORDER WITH WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC., UNDER TH~ CURRENT ANNUAL AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANT $EI~VICES FOR PREPARATION OF THE UPDATE OF THE NON-AD VALOR~ A~ES~MENT ROLL IN THE PINE RIDGE INDUSTRIAL PARK MUNICIPAL SERVIC~ TAXING AND BENEFIT UNIT FOR TAX YEAR 1993-1994 - IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,000.00 Itu#16H9 See Pages APPltOVAL OF SUFFLEMNNTAL AGREEMENT NO. 12 WITH APAC OF FLORIDA, INC. FOR CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENTS TO C.R. 31 BETWEEN C.R. 865 AND U.S. 41 - IN TH~ AMOUNT OF $3,0?2.?8 - TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT $1,692,808.05 See Pages (~(~o -- Itmm #~6J MISCELLAN~OU~ CORRESPORDENCZ - FILED AND/OR REFERRED The following m$scellaneous correspondence was f$1ed and or referred as presented by the Board of County Commiss$oners. 000P, 69 Page 48 It~R ~1~J1 -- !qovu~ to Item ~10F Item~16K1 INTERIM F/NAN~AL INFORMATION AS OF APRIL 30, 1994 June 7, 1994 B31DORSKMKBT OFT HE STATE 0P FLORIDA'S DEPARTMXRT OF COMMURITY AFFAIRS~ ANTI-DRUG ACT FORMULA GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION See Pages ~"~0 -- ~-~ ~ Itelt ~16K3 APPROVAL OF THE USE OF CONFISCATED TRUST FUNDS FOR THE SUPPORT OF CRIME P~EFENTION FROGRAM MATERIALS - IN THE AMOUNT $5,100.00 It~#16L1 RESOLUTIO~ 94-400, CtP3 9~-~ RE APPROVAL AND RATIPICATION 0F A RELEASE OF NOTI~ OF~IMOF LI~N FOR SANITARY S~R SYSTEM IMPACT l~ES See Pages There being no further business for the Good of the CounTy, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 5:40 P.M. ATTEST: DWIgHt CLERK ~hese minutes ~pproved by the Board on as p~'~e~te'~ ~ or as corrected BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX CONT~. Page 49