Loading...
BCC Minutes 06/17/1994 B (Budget Workshop)Naples, Florida, June 17, lgg4 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and havinG conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 A.M. in BUDGET WORKSHOP SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Timothy J. Constantine VICE-CHAIRMAN: Betrye J. Matthews John C. Norris Michael J. Volpe Burr L. Saunders ALSO PRESENT: Sue Barbtretti and Marilyn Fernley, Deputy Clerks; Dwight Brock, Clerk of Courts; Pat Welch, Administrative Assistant to the Clerk of Courts: Nell Dotrill, County Manager; Will~am HatGert, Assistant County Manager; Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects Management Director; Bill Lorenz, Environmental Services Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Mike Smykowski, Acting Budget Director; Ed Finn and Jean Gansel, Budget Analysts; John Drury, Collier County Airport Director; George Moore, Marco Island Airport Manager; Steve Price, Airport Authority Budget Committee Chairman; and Paul Brigham, Court Administrator. Page June 17, 1994 Legal notice having been published In the Naples Daily News on June 11, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, a budget workshop was held to review line Item budgets for 1994-95. Tape #1 State Attorney Jean Gansel, Budget Analyst, introduced Mr. Pearlman and Ms. Stansbro from the State Attorney's Office in Fort Myers. Ms. Gansel reported that the State Attorney budget is increasing by 12%. She said that one of the major capital costs included is $10,000.00 for securing their reception area. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Ms. Stansbro replied that the cost of the fax machine is not a replacement but an addition. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Ms. Stansbro stated that a color printer Is not a necessity but will be helpful with diagrams and presentations. Ms. Stansbro stated that a color printer is listed at $569.00 and a black and white printer is listed at approximately $350.00. Public Defender Ms. Gansel introduced Marlene Williams and Jim Sullivan from the Public Defender Office in Fort Myers. Ms. Gansel stated that the County pays for similar items as referenced In the State Attorney's office, such as office space, uti- lities, communication and transportation costs. In addition, the County pays for two attorneys and one secretary. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Sullivan stated that the Public Defender Office in Naples has 13 employees. Mr. Sullivan explained that the large increase in caseload requires the utilization of two additional printers. (224) County/Circuit Court Costs Ms. Gansel stated that the page depicting costs for County/Circuit Court has been revamped to better reflect where the costs are being June 17, 1994 distributed. She that the Court Reporter costs are included because the Public Defender operation is court ordered. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Ms. Ganeel stated that the cost of the Clerk of Court employees who sit in the courtroom are included in this budget. Me. Ganeel stated that the other major costs include court appointed attorneys. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Paul Brigham, Court Administrator, stated that these attorneys are court appointed because of conflict with the Public Defender Office or the Public Defender could declare that he does not have the resources to handle his case- load. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Brigham stated that the Public Defender Budget is not included in this budget because their funding is a combination of State and County funding. He said that the State funds the Public Defender employees. Commissioner Matthews remarked that if the State funds the employees salaries and it is the Public Defender Office that has the conflict, why is the County funding this item? Mr. Brigham stated that the State should be funding all court costs. He said they have never appropriated the money since the change in Florida Statutes and the Constitution. He stated that ten years ago the Statute stated that the costs were the State's respon- sibility but they have never funded it. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Brigham stated that the County tries to pass the costs back to the State at every possible opportunity. He said that Chapter 43, Line 28, says that whatever the State does not fund, the County must fund. Commissioner Matthews questioned how often the County requests reimbursement? She said that this is a State responsibility and does not think the Gounty should fund it. Mr. Brigham replied that a few months ago, the Florida Association of Counttee (FAC) sent a survey regarding court costs. He said that 000 04 Page 3 June 17, lgg4 the survey stated that it is a State responsibility, but the County has been generous enough to fund these Items. Commissioner Matthews stated that her generosity is running thin. She said that the County has other needs for its' citizens if the State were doing what it was supposed to do. She asked if the Board of County Commissioners are ready to send the State a bill? She asked if the County is assuming the expenditure because the State says they do not have enough money. Mr. Brigham replied that the position of the County and every other County in the State is that it is a State expenditure, and tt is incumbent upon court Staff to use the funds appropriated by the Board of County Commissioners wisely. He said that they try to move toward contracts with attorney firms rather than doing things on a case-by- case basis. Commissioner Constantine asked If the FAC is pursuing legislation changes or pursuing legal fixtures? Mr. Brigham replied that earlier in the year the Board was Invited to participate in a lawsuit against the State regarding this issue. He said that almost on an annual basis the FAC does something to pro- test the court costs. Commissioner Matthews remarked that because the FAC is involved in so many issues, it may not be a strong enough protest. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Brigham stated that he does not believe that enough Counties are ready to follow through with the lawsuit. He said he would check and follow up. Commissioner Matthews stated that she is not opposed to the fact that the money will have to be spent because the State has not allotted for it, but stated that she would like to see the State carry more of its burden next year. Co~miseioner Saunders suggested that the Board compose a letter expressing their concerns and have Commissioner Matthews present the letter to the FAC at their meeting next week in Fort Lauderdale. Commissioner Matthews stated that she appreciates the 9~ reduction Page 4 June 17, 1994 in overall costs and the monitoring of funds. She reiterated that this cost should be borne by the State of Florida at large and not the citizens of Collier County. Commissioner Matthews agreed to draft the letter to the FAC. Ms. Ganeel noted that Page 20 depicts the Criminal Justice Trust Fund. She noted that there is an additional fee that is attached to Court Costs that the State Legislation passed that transfers funds into the General Fund to offset some of the costs. She said the amount of $285,000.00 is transferred for the State Attorney, Public Defender and the Medical Examiner. Mr. Brigham pointed out that the County is collecting 55~ of fines Imposed. Commissioner Matthews stated that the County is spending taxpayers money to collect the fines and the State continues to get 100~ of their share without sharing in the cost of collection. (860) County Prob~tion Me. Ganeel stated that at the last budget workshop, the Board ranked as "Essential" an additional Probation Officer and a part-time/full-time secretary for the Intensive Supervision Immokalee Program. She said that the costs associated with those positions are $67,000.00. She pointed out that the revenues have been decreasing in this budget. George Drobinskt, Probation Director, stated that the Statute pro- vides for a number of statutory waivers for misdemeanor offenders who are sanctioned to probation. He said that if they are elderly, stu- dents or handicapped they may be subject to waiver of fees. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Drobtnski explained that the part-time secretarial position will be expanded to full-time in the Naples area. He explained that Statute recommends that an Intensive case load not exceed 50 offenders, he said that there are currently 62 offenders on the program at this time. He stated that the Contact Program includes a number of contacts per week and status Page 5 3une 17, 1994 checks from the secretary. In response to Commis·ioner Matthews, Mr. Drobtnskt stated that this overall budget includes the new 900 automated ·ystem program. · es Commissioner Yelps entered the meeting at this time see (73~) #/tneHm Nana~Mnt/Victil Assistance Ms. Ganeel stated that there is an overall increase of 12.8~ for Witness Management which is attributed to an expanded program to auto- ~ate the records. (?~S) Gou~.t Secul'L":y Ms. Ganeel stated that the proposed budget will maintain the current Court Security operation. She recalled that the Federal Marshal's Service did a study regarding whether the Sheriff's Office should undertake that program. She said that the Sheriff has proposed a budget but has not included figures in his budget. She reported that the difference would be approximately $75,000.00 more per year if the Sheriff'e Office assumes responsibility of the operation. Ms. Ganeel clarified that the dollar figure has not been included in the Sheriff's budget. Mr. Brtgha~ pointed out that the target date for the transfer of security to the Shertff~s Office is April 1, 1995. He stated that the Judges wish that the security be transferred to the Sh·riff's Office in accordance with the response from the U.S. Marshal's Service. County Manager Derrill stated that he Is concerned as to whether there Is a Justifiable need. He recalled that when the Court House first opened there was a period of time when Sheriff's Deputies pro- vided the security. He said that resulted in a great deal of concern in the community that more Deputies were inside the Courthouse than in any District in the County. He said that Mr. Brigham provided him with a copy of th· Federal Marshal's report. He stated that he would make cop/es of the report for the Board members. H· concluded that · determination has to be made as to who requested the survey and the -o, Page 6 June l?, 1994 extent of problems because the funding is not addressed in anyone's budget. Commissioner Constantine suggested leaving the budget as it is and hear the Sheriff's suggestions. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Dotrill stated that this would be a substitution of personnel that would no longer require the County Security Officers. He mentioned that some physical security requirements would be necessary, such as a security wall around the Judges parking lot and a guard gate. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brigham replied that priva- tizing the security force was considered years ago. He said it was determined that it was cheaper to provide the service in-house rather than contract it out. Mr. Brigham stated that he would like to see all security for the Courthouse under one agency to be run by the Sheriff's Office. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brigham replied that if the operation were to be operated by the Sheriff's Office, the Court Security Department would be dissolved. He said that the Staff would be invited to apply for the positions in the Sheriff's Office. Commissioner Matthews asked what benefit would the citizens gain with this change? Mr. Brigham stated that the principle benefit is tighter security in the Courthouse. He said that the second benefit would be that all security would be operating under one agency. He stated that the third benefit would be that security communications would be open at all times. He explained that presently the bailiffs operate on a dif- ferent frequency than the Courthouse security people. Commissioner Constantine stated that the budget will remain as is before the final budget. Court ~iniltr&tLon Commissioner Constantine asked if this budget includes the Volunteer Coordinator that was "red flagged" at the last workshop? .-08' Page ? June 17, 1994 Ms. Ganeel replied that one person was requested to share a posi- tion with the Clerk of Courts. She said that half the salary is included in the expanded request. She stated that this was ranked as "Discretionary" In response to Commissioner Constantine° Mr. Brigham replied that the Board added $30,000.00 to the Human Resources budget for the Recap Coordinator. Mr. Brigham stated that the Personnel Request Form detailed that 50~ of this persons time would be spent on Citizens Foster Care Review Panel. He said that the Panel provides a great service to the children involved in the Dependency System. He said that members of the Panel are here today to comment on the program. Commissioner Constantine stated that public comment is not usually part of the budget workshop. Commissioner Saunders stated that he asked the members to come today to explain what the program was about. He said that he distri- buted a letter he received from Sheriff Hunter. He read a letter that he received from Judge Blackwell that supported the position. Mary Shamba, Chairman of the Executive Board of the Citizens Foster Care Review Panel, explained the program to the Board. Commissioner Constantine stated the Board is not suggesting that we not do the program. He said that at yesterday's budget workshop, a discussion was held on a position in another department that was only going to be a few hours per week. He said that rather than fund both positions a discussion was held on funding both positions together. Commissioner Volpe asked if Health & Rehabilttattve Services (HRS) monitored the placement of children? Ms. Shamba replied that HRS does monitor placement, but the Foster Care Review Panel monitors HRS. Commissioner Norris remarked that the program is valuable but what is being discussed today is an adminietrat~ve position and where the position will be located. Commissioner Saunders remarked that he believes that the Board Page 8 June 17, 1994 will fund the position. He said that the issue is where the position will be located. It was the consensus of the Board to fund the position and direct Staff to determine under which Division would be most appropriate for funding. (t350) Co~t Counseling Commissioner Matthews remarked that the majority of the 5~ increase is in Personal Services. She stated that this is in line with the salary increases that have been suggested. (2388) C~rcu~t Cou~t Judges Ms. Gansel stated that the budgets for the Circuit Court Judges and County Court Judges remain fairly constant. She said that this year the budget for the Circuit Court has increased because of two part-time Judges assigned to Collier County as compared to one part- time Judge that was anticipated. Commissioner Matthews asked if the County has to provide separate chambers for the two judges? Mr. Brigham stated that due to overlapping calendars the two Judges have separate offices. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brigham confirmed that he is operating at maximum efficiency in terms of chambers. Commissioner Matthews expressed concern regarding the fact that the State was going to assign one part-time Judge. She said that what they have done is assigned two part-time Judges who each require separate chambers, yet between the two they still remain part-time. She said that the State is dictating what the County must do. Cot~t~Court Judgms Ms. Gansel stated that this budget has gone up approximately (2602) Econoitc Crime Rehabilitation Progru & Alcohol Inforutton el&same Ms. Gansel explained that these two programs are self-supporting programs. She said that people are assigned to these programs by the Page 9 $une 17, 1994 Judges and the people must pay for the classes. (1652) Guardianship Ms. Ganeel stated that this fund began two years ago. She stated that there is an additional cost to filing fees. She said that the County matches that cost from the General Fund. Commissioner Volpe commented that the Forecast is $20,000.00, but $70,600.00 is being budgeted for the next fiscal year. He asked ~f the amount could be cut back based on the last two years experience? Mr. Brigham stated that the County Attorney may present the Board with a Resolution to suspend the collection of the additional filing fee thereby suspending the appropriation from the County. In response to Commiss~oner Volpe, Ms. Ganeel reiterated that the County must match the collection. Commissioner Volpe commented that there seems to be too much budgeted. Commissioner Matthews stated that this item will be "flagged" for the final budget hearings. Drug Abuse Trust Ms. Ganeel stated that an additional assessment on drug conv~c- tions is incorporated into this Trust Fund and is used for drug pre- vention programs. (1800) Criminal Justice Trust Ms. Ganeel stated that addit~onal court costs are used to reimburse the General Fund to offset some of the State operations. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brock, Clerk of Courts, stated that it has been hie responsibility to collect the Judgements. Mr. Brock stated that he does not believe that money from this Trust Fund could be used for collections. Other General Administration Ms. Ganeel stated that this item Includes a 20~ decrease due to the tax delinquent sales. She said that the one increase in this {~00K OOOP,v,[.-ll Page 10 June 17, 1994 budget is the transfer to the School Board. She stated that as the County pays down the debt service fund, the Race Track Revenue is pledged. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Gansel stated that the bonds will mature in July, 2003. (~003) Clerk of Courts Debt Service Funds Ms. Gansel stated that these funds pay off the bond/obligation. She referred to Page 2, the Tourist Development Tax. She said that although it is not a debt service, the money has been collected in Fund 208. Ms. Gansel referred to the new Debt Service Fund on Page 4. She stated that this fund will pay off the construction costs and assessments for Pine Ridge Industrial Park and Naples Production Park. In response to Commissioner VelDs, Mr. Brock stated that the interest rate on the Commercial Paper Program is low. Assistant County Manager Hatgatt stated that the County has the options of taking the savings up front or spreading it over the life of the bonds. He said that the potential of buying down on the Commercial Paper Program will be brought before the Board for their consideration. ''~ Recaaa: 10:00 AM - Reconvaned: 10:30 AM At thie time Deputy Clerk Fernle¥ replaced Deputy Clerk Barblrettt sea Clerk of Courts Ed Finn, Budget Analyst, stated that the Clerk of Courts budget reflects the various departments that obtain funding from the Board of County Commissioners through an ad valorem tax transfer and Include Administration, Finance and Accounting, Minutes and Records and Cashiering which is fully funded by ad valorem taxes. Mr. Finn indicated that the Clerk Administration/Clerk of Circuit Court includes Administration and the Internal Audit Department and obtains partial funding through a General Fund transfer. Page June l?, 1994 Mr. Finn explained that the Clerk of County Court receives 100 percent funding from the General Fund ad valorem tax transfer. Mr. Finn pointed out that under Special Services is Records Management and Management Information System Departments and obtains partial funding from the Board of County Commissioners. Dwight Brock, Clerk of Courts, asked the Board of County Commissioners if the members would like to receive verbatim transcripts of meetings? Commissioner Constantine stated he would definitely like to receive verbatim transcripts. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that approximately three (3) years ago verbatim transcripts were provided and discovered that due to the time and effort involved they were not necessary but available if needed. He discouraged the Board of County Commissioners from requiring verbatim transcripts because no one took the time to read them anyway. Commissioner Constantine indicated that he listens to audio tapes on different issues from one (1} or two (2) meetings per month and feels that a verbatim transcript would be less cumbersome. Mr. Brock pointed out that the Clerk of Courts Division does not provide verbatim transcripts by County employees but an audio tape is provided to a court reportfng service who transcribes verbatim. Mr. Finn stated that the Clerk of Board budget reflects a 3.8 percent reduction attributable to staff turnover as reflected in the reduction in personal services and operating expenses. Mr. Finn indicated that capital outlay includes two (2) personal computers, one (1) laser printer, office furniture and office equipment. Mr. Finn stated that revenues for the Clerk of Board are a ser- vice charge for providing cashiering for the Utilities Division and Community Development Division. Mr. Finn stated that Clerk Administration/Clerk of Circuit Court detail page reflects the addition of one (1) position as an expanded Page June l?, 1994 request for an internal auditor position which is partially funded through fee revenues and General Fund support. He indicated that the balance of the change in positions is simply transfers within the Clerk of Circuit Court operating departments. Commissioner Volpe questioned if the Clerk of Courts has a purchasing department and mentioned utilizing the Board of County Commissioners purchasing department. Mr. Brock stated that the Board of County Commissioners purchasing department was utilized but was not cost affectire. He indicated that the Board's purchasing department does assist the Clerk's Office whenever the need arises and the County blanket contracts are used. Mr. Finn stated that the Clerk of County Courts department is fully funded by ad valorem taxes and the decrease of one (1) position is the result of a transfer into the Internal Audit section. Mr. Finn pointed out that capital expenditures include $18,000 for satellite office program building improvements and $3,600 for office equipment. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brock informed the Board that satellite offices exist in Immokalee and Golden Gate and antici- pate opening satellite offices in the Greentree Shopping Center and on Marco Island. He explained that except in Immokalee, the Clerk's Office shares space in Golden Gate and is willing to share space in the Greentree Shopping Center and on Marco Island with the Tax Collector's Office. Mr. Finn indicated the the Records Management budget is partially funded by fees and a transfer from ad valorem taxes. He explained that the capital outlay is for shelving and a numbering machine. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brock informed the Board that the Clerk's Office is investigating contracting with Lee County for microfilm services as well as other alternatives. Commissioner Matthews pointed out that the Prlvatizatton Task Force is in the process of prioritizing items and will be addressing a [~OO~( ~COP~'r'~ '14 Page 13 June 17, 1994 couple issues for the Clerk's Office. Commissioner Volpe stated that discussions have been held regarding inventory control and fixed assets. Mr. Brock indicated that a bar code system has been implemented as a case tracking mechanism in Courts and he is presently investi- gating utilizing the case tracking system with modifications for addi- tional purposes. Mr. Finn explained that the Clerkts Management Information Systems budget is partially funded by fee revenue and by a transfer from the General Fund. He stated that the position count remains the same and operating expenses have been reduced by reductions in data processing equipment repair and maintenance costs. Mr. Finn pointed out that the Clerk"s budget pertaining to func- tions that include Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, County Auditor, Treasurer of County funds and other County related duties is required to be submitted on or before June ! of each year. He explained that the fully fee supported portion of the Clerk"s budget pertaining to Clerk of the State Courts including recording is required to be submitted on or before September 1 of each year. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Brock indicated that the $32,400 for data processing equipment includes personal computer local area network (LAN) and desk top computers. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brock stated that the Staff member performing investment type activities is in the Administration budget and performs approximately 95 percent of the investment work for the Board of County Commissioners but the Board only supports 63 percent of the cost of the employee. Mr. Brock pointed out that his budget salaries were increased by only five percent (5~). Mr. Finn indicated that each salary was increased by six and one half percent (6.5~). Commissioner Saunders stated that he thought the Board direction was a three percent (3~) across the board salary increase with addi- Page 14 June 17, 1994 ttonal funds being set aside for increases in worker's compensation and other payroll related expenses and some monies set aside for merit increases. Mike Smykowskt, Acting Budget Director, indicated that the com- ponents of the 6.5 percent salary adjustment is three percent (3~) for general wage adjustments, one and one half percent (1.5~) for merit and two percent (2~) for pay plan adjustments. Mr. Finn pointed out that in the Manager's budget, two percent (2~) was budgeted for attrition. Tr~n~port&t~on Ed Finn, Budget Analyst, stated that the Special Project position has not been funded and only two (2) additional positions in Traffic Operations have been budgeted per Board direction. Mr. Finn stated that the road construction plan redtrected $1.8 million of local option $.06 gas tax which typically funded Road and Bridge operations and reallocated the funds to road construction, replacing the $1.8 million with sales tax revenue. He indicated that the Road and Bridge fund contains a large carry forward which reduces the need for the sales tax transfer to $41,200 for FY 94-95; however, this is a one time revenue source only and next year the County will need $4.5 million in sales tax dollars to fund Road and Bridge operations. Commissioner Matthews pointed out that Mr. Hargett, Assistant County Manager, prepared an analysis of funding on the County ten (10) year road project which indicated a significant carry forward and questioned if the carry forward is being consumed for road and bridge maintenance as opposed to construction? Mr. Finn indicated that the fund which supports operations has a large carry forward and the carry forward for road construction is separate. Commissioner Matthews questioned if the County can move the $1.8 .'16 Page 15 June ~?, 1994 ~ million from the sales tax revenue out of the General Fund into Fund 10! and reduce the shortfall in the ten (10) year program for road construction? Mike Smykowski, Acting Budget Direction, indicated that an addi- tional $1.8 million of ad valorem taxes will be required for the General Fund. Commissioner Matthews suggested that it may behoove the County to reduce the amount transferred in FY 94-95 and spread the carry forward over a couple of years rather than needing $4.5 million in FY 95-96. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Finn replied that the $4.5 million will be offset by ad valorem taxes. Mr. Hatgert explained that before the budget is adopted, figures will be available regarding revenues generated by the new $.05 gas tax, favorable construction bids on projects, the addition of 1999 in the five (5) year plan, bond refunding, etc. affecting the amount of monies necessary to be transferred. Mr. Smykowski indicated that in July the Board will be adopting a tentative millage rate. Mr. Finn pointed out that the budget is constructed to minimize the impact on ad valorem taxes. Mr. Finn pointed out that expanded requests include the addition of a traffic technician and a maintenance worker in Traffic Operations. He indicated that the cost for the two (2) positions is approximately $70,000 including equipment. Mr. Finn explained that the operating expenses for new traffic signals and arterial street lights to be added to the current system is an expanded request and includes $45,000 for electricity and $21,000 for contractual maintenance. Mr. Finn stated that $23,000 for traffic signs is being requested as an expanded service and includes $5,000 for replacement signs as part of the Golden Gate sign program with the balance for overhead street name and informational signs at ma3or intersect~ons. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Transportation Services Page 16 June 17, 1994 Administrator Archibald informed the Board that all the signs have been installed and approximately 90 percent of pavement markings are completed for the Golden Gate sign project. Mr. Finn stated that the budget for the MSTU which provides ser- vices to East Naples, South Naples and Marco Island reflects a 49 percent decrease in ad valorem taxes for FY 94-95 and is due primarily to revenue reserves. In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Archibald explained that Marco Island will establish a separate MSTU probably by the end of 1994 through a public petition but will not affect the FY 94-95 budget. Mr. Finn stated that the North Naples MSTU budget includes an expanded request of $40,000 representing the maintenance costs for the median program. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Finn informed that the $40,000 consists of the $35,000 annual cost plus electricity and water which the County is under contract to pay over a ten (10) year period. Mr. Finn stated that the budget for the MSTU covering Golden Gate, Golden Gate Estates and East Naples reflects a decrease in ad valorem taxes. Mr. Finn explained that the MSTU budget for the general unincor- porated Collier County area indicates a decrease in ad valorem taxes. Mr. Finn stated that the GAC Road Improvements Fund is funded through carry forward which is gradually decreasing. Mr. Finn indicated that the Private Industry County Fund is a developer contribution that is owed to the County. Jean Gansel, Budget Analyst, stated that the Beautification MSTU budgets are prepared by Staff in conjunction with the homeowners' association or responsible body regarding functions to be completed. She indicated that all the MSTU Districts have millage limitations and all proposed budgets fall within those limitations. Ms. Gansel pointed out that the North Naples Roadway MSTU pro- posed budget recommends that one (1) mill be levied and transferred to Page 17 June 17, 1994 the General Fund to repay cost of defeastng bonds. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Archibald stated that a method for reorganizing the North Naples Roadway MSTU is underway by Staff who is drafting at least three (3) different ordinances which will divide the North Naples Roadway MSTU and possibly eliminating certain portion of same but will not be effective until FY 95-96 if considered by the Board this fiscal year. Gommisstoner Volpe questioned if the Imperial Unit § Issue has been addressed regarding impacts to the limited number of homes allowed to be constructed? Mr. Archibald indicated that the Imperial Unit 5 issue w~ll be addressed as part of an ordinance which will address the district boundaries and constraints in existing development orders. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that the County perpetuates the Inequity that the property owners are experiencing and is grossly unfair to the affected parties. He suggested not imposing any millaGe on the North Naples Roadway MSTU for FY 94-95. Commissioner Matthews pointed out that the Board promised to correct the inequity. It was the conaanmus of the Board not to levy the one (1) mill on the North Naplem Roadway MSTU. Ms. Gansel stated that the Street Lighting Districts have been consolidated and the Finance Department has requested that one (1) mill be levied allowing the districts to draw against any carry for- wards in FY 95-96 until depleted. She pointed out that even though three (3) districts were added, a reduced budget ~s proposed. Ms. Gansel indicated that by consol/dating the districts, administrative costs have been reduced by $4,400, contingency reserves by $4,600, budgeted transfer to elected officials by $8,900 and electric budgets by $45,000. Commissioner Norris stated that inequities were discussed pre- viously regarding Marco Island, i.e. Marco Island millage would triple by the consolidation. He questioned if the inequity has been .'19 Page 18 June 17, 1994 addressed? Ms. Ganeel responded that the Marco Island millage rate last year was .05 and the consolidated district will be .127 and the difference is $5.00 per $100,000 taxable value to $12.70 per $100,000 per year. She indicated that inequities exist in all the funds but by con- solidation, everyone is assessed the same millage rate for the same service. Commissioner Norris stated that Marco Island is one of the larger districts and the consolidation affected the property owners there more than the other districts as far as inequity is concerned. He suggested not including the Marco Island district in the consolidated district. Ms. Ganeel indicated that there will not be a substantial impact to the Street Lighting District if Marco Island is removed but the the ordinance provides for only one (1) district and the Property Appraiser established one (1) d~strict. Mr. Archibald pointed out that flexibility of one {1) year to address the issue is available but over time the millage on Marco Island may increase due to the large number of lights being added each year because of the tremendous growth in the area. He explained that the possibility exists that Marco Island could reach or exceed the consolidated millage rate in the near future even as an independent district. It wm~ the consensus of the Board to elininate Marco Islmnd from the consolidated Street Lighting District and Staff to advise and report back on Monday, June 20, 1994 what steps are necess&x-f to &cco~plish same. Commissioner Matthews pointed out that a credit may need to be offered next year if the property appraiser cannot make changes for FY 94-95. (2238) Ed Finn, Budget Analyst, stated that expenditures for the Airport Authority include the seven (7) month phase in and $41,000 for preli- ~O§K OOOF~,r,~..'20 Page :19 June 17, 1994 mtnary design, engineering and permitting for the Immokalee Airport project. Mr. Finn indicated that Staff if proposing to change the funding source for Airport Authority operations for FY 95 from Fund 111 to the General Fund and includes the Immokalee Airport, Everglades Airport and the Airport Authority. He stated that the rationale for the funding change is that airports are a part of the Count¥'s overall transportation network, economic development is a main thrust of the Airport Authority and Everglades City is a municipality which does not pay taxes into the unincorporated area. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. F~nn stated that the Naples Airport is a fee supported airport. Mr. Finn indicated that $24,400 in airport revenue is expected to be generated in FY 94/95 through lease arrangements in both Immokalee and Everglades. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Finn explained that the Marco Island airport is self supporting and is not included as part of the whole system because the County does not own the Marco Island air- port and Staff is disinclined to mingle the assets. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that over the past three (3) years efforts have been put forth in anticipation of eventual ownership of the Marco Island airport. He stated that a lease remains unsigned at this point, the County has taken over personnel at the airport and suggested that the County ~nclude the Marco Island Airport within the airport system and not be handled separately. John Drury, Airport Authority Director, stated that there is no reason why the County should not include the Marco Island Airport within the whole system. County Manager Dotrill explained that separate cost centers have been maintained for the Marco Island Airport because of the uncer- tainty of the County's ownership. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that under the lease arrangement, Collier County is to pay a ten percent (10%) override to the State. Page 20 June 17, 1994 Mr. Dotrill stated that failure to have a valid lease precludes the obligation to pay rental payments. Commissioner Volpe recommended that all airports be incorporated as one (1) system and take advantage of the revenues. Commissioner Norris pointed out that before the Board of County Commissioners spends capital funds on the Marco Island Airport, title to the property needs to be obtained. Commissioner Constantine stated that ownership of the Marco Island Airport may be obtained before the summer is over. Mr. Finn stated that the expanded requests include a four (4) month phase in of staff for the Immokalee Airport as well as a vehicle and relative operation costs for the Airport Authority Director. Mr. Drury informed the Board that Fleet Management has loaned a vehicle for his use but has requested that he purchase his own. Commissioner Constantine indicated that the request from Fleet Management may be corrected by the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Drury introduced Steve Price, Chairman of the Budget Committee for the Airport Authority and George Moore, Manager of the Marco Island Airport. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Drur¥ informed that the position of Director of the Immokalee Airport is being phased in near the end of facility construction completion and the Airport will be required to operate seven (7) days a week, at least eight (8) hours per day, and the Director will be performing dual roles to cover the weekends. He explained that two (2) people will be working at the Immokalee Airport when the facilities are completed to service aircraft, i.e. dispensing fuel, tie down of aircraft, collecting revenues, official notifications to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), etc. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Drury stated that he is hoping that the Immokalee Airport w~ll be opem ten (lO) hours a day by staggering hours and days of the two (2) employees. Steve Price, Chairman of the Budget Committee for the Airport 000 .'22 Page 21 June 17, 1994 Authority, stated that the second person on duty can perform main- tenance duties when hours overlap. He indicated that the airport is in almost constant use during daylight hours because it is utilized as a training facility. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Drury indicated that in lieu of landing fees, fuel flowage fees are utilized to offset the cost of operating the Airport which can be instigated when the facili- ties are completed. Commissioner Volpe stated that in an effort to maximize revenues at the Immokalee Airport, a fee arrangement should be in-place for utilizing the airspace for aerobatic flying. Mr. Drury pointed out that the FAA has Jurisdiction over airspace but the County has total Jurisdiction over utilizing the facilities which is the basis for the capital improvement program, to generate revenues at the Immokalee Airport. Commissioner Constantine stated that $17,800 can be saved by eli- minating the necessity of purchasing a new vehicle and the associated insurance. He explained that utilization of a fleet vehicle is preferable. Mr. Finn explained that there are five (5) employees at the Marco Island Airport. Mr. Finn stated that fuel sales are down slightly at the Marco Island Airport which is reflected in the forecast budget. Mr. Finn indicated that there is an increase in the reserves for the Marco Island Airport and the Board can offset ad valorem tax sup- port with the excess reserve or the reserves can be retained. Commissioner Constantine stated that the County should take advantage of funds already dedicated toward aviation. Commissioner Matthews indicated that the reserves should not be depleted since Collier County is ~n a tremendous growth mode until the future needs are established. Commissioner Volpe stated that the whole idea of consolidating is to consolidate the revenues, adding that the reserves have been Page 22 June 17, 1994 increased by 132 percent. Mike Smykowskt, Acting Budget Director, Indicated that an outstanding loan exists from the Roads Capital for initial operations of the airports. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Smykowski explained that there is no capital maintenance built into the Marco Island Airport budget for such things as runway resurfactng. Mr. Finn stated that Staff tried to develop a minimal reserve based on the retained earnings generated at the Marco Island Airport. In response to Commissioner Yelps, Mr. Finn explained that the reserves are for operating maintenance of capital assets. It was the consensus of the Board to retain the 860,800 in reserves. see Recessed: 11:50 A.M. - Reconvened: 1:30 P.M. at which tiaa Deputy Clerk Barbtretti replaced Deputy Clerk Fernlay see (2139) Sherlff's Office Law Enforcement Jean Oansel, stated that the total of the Shertff's General Fund Budget is $43,717,300.00. She said that approximately $800,000.00 is Board funded expenses which is a 6.2X increase over last year's budget. She said included in this request is the absorption of five positions previously funded in Fund 602 and two Victim Advocates that were previously funded by a grant fund. She said expanded positions Include two youth relations deputies, two North Naples road patrol deputies, two canine teams, a civilian investigator and three bailiffs. She said that the Sheriff has included a 5X Increase on anniversary dates. She said that the County paid health portion of the budget are equal to the other County agency premiums but may be reduced by as much as last year's reduction of $400,000.00. Crystal Ktnzel, Shertff's Office Finance Director, explained that the hospital program that the Shertff's Office is Involved in is pri- marily through Naples Community Hospital with a managed care program. 000 Page 23 June 17, 1994 In response to Commissioner Constantine, Ms. Ktnzel stated that one of the youth relations deputies will be stationed at the new middle school in Manetee and the other will be a supplement. She said that there is a total of 21 youth relations deputies. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Ms. Kinzel responded that there is presently a total of six canine units that are dual certified in narcotics and road patrol. She explained that the two requested teams will be certified for bomb and road patrol purposes. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Me. Kinzel said that cross-training in the existing animals is Impossible because of dif- ferent smell and training patterns. In answer to Commissioner Constantine, Ms. Ktnzel explained that a manpower analysis had been done to determine that the two North Naples road patrols were necessary. She stated that actual calls for service were used to determine where deputies are needed for preventative patrol. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Ms. Kinzel explained that the civilian investigator in Immokalee is an expansion of an existing program that the Sheriff began in the Naples Investigation Unit. She said that a civilian will process a great deal of paperwork for the Investigator. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Ms. Kinzel etated that the beginning five years ago the Sheriffs Office had begun to carry for- ward approximately 880,000.00 to avoid replacing radios. She said that should the 800 MHz not be implemented the radios will have to be replaced. Commissioner Matthews asked if it would be possible to obtain radio equipment from other areas? Me. Ktnzel etated that the Sheriff'e Office has Incorporated other systems into their own to the best of its ability. She said that under the Division of Communications guidelines, 44~ of the mobile units do not meet the eight year or younger criteria. She said that 80~ of the portable units do not meet the six year or younger cri- Page 24 June 17, 1994 teria. Commissioner Norris remarked that he has discussed the option of rebuilt radios with the Sheriff. Be said that the Sheriff agreed to look into the option. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Ms. Kinzel explained that the $118,000.00 for Data Processing equipment includes additional information to serve Building A in Immokalee. (2863) ~ete~tio~ In~ Corrections Ms. Ktnzel stated that this budget proposes no changes from last years budget. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Ktnzel replied that the detention increase of 11.4% is based on the increasing population. Commissioner Volpe commented that he is not convinced on the Justification for the increase. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Ms. Kinzel stated that the Shertff's Office attempts to maintain a steady force supplemented with overtime throughout the year. She explained that paying overtime is less than paying benefits on a new hire. Commissioner Norris stated that the population of the County has not increased 40% over last year. Commissioner Matthews remarked that crime in the County has decreased. Ms. Kinzel stated that all the information ~s being analyzed to determine the cause and the trend. Ms. Kinzel explained that she hopes that some of the operating contracts will come in lower over the summer resulting in a reduction of the line items. Tape ,S In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Ktnzel stated that the Shertff's Office does not have a physician on Staff. She said that the Jail medical service is a complete contract service. Ms. Ktnzel agreed to provide the Board with a summary of the popu- lation analysis. Page ~5 June 17, 1994 3udtcial (Bailiffs) Commissioner Matthews commented that there are three full-time positions proposed in this budget. Ms. Kinzel explained that the three new pos~tions are in-courtroom bailiffs. Commissioner Volpe stated that Mr. Brigham, Court Administrator, had suggested that all court security be operated by the Sheriff's Office. Ms. Klnzel stated that this item is part of two separate com- ponents for budget purposes. She said all that is presented on this page is the bailiff component of the in-courtroom security. She said that she did not incorporate the entire courthouse security into this budget because it was a proposal and she did not have Board direction. She stated that it is included in the last component of the budget because At is a Board option. Ms. Gansel stated that the increment she spoke of earlier does not include these three bailiffs. Commissioner Volpe confirmed that the County ks adding three bailiffs because the County has two new part-time Judges that initiate more courtroom time. (~?~) Sheriff'o Or~nto Ms. Kinzel stated that she will bring back funding for a Career Criminal Element of the Grant. She said that the Sheriff's Office views that as an on going program. She said that the budget will be brought back separately because it has not been officially awarded yet. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Kinzel explained that the bailiffs are certified law enforcement officers. Commissioner Volpe expressed concern with the program. He stated that there should be a way of providing security within the courtroom but see the funds directed to additional road patrol deputies. Page 26 June l?, 1994 In response to Commissioner Matthews, Ms. Kinzel explained that the criteria of "light duty" would involve their potential for being involved in an altercation. Commissioner Volpe stated that he would like to see a change. Ms. Ktnzel statsd this item is for the ordinary court operations with the additional part-time 3udges. She said that she will review the court hearing with the Sheriff. Commissioner Volpe stated that the total budget for the Bailiff Program is $905,000.00. He said that if the County moves forward with the expanded program it would require $291,000.00 for a total of $1,206,000.00. Commissioner Constantine announced that no changes will be made at this time. (403) K-911 E~ergency Phone Syetem Ms. Kinzel stated that this budget had been previously approved by the Board in March because it was due to go to AT&T. She said that reduced the actual amount of the call to .25¢. Commissioner Matthews stated that last year the 911 local option fee was reduced from .50¢ to a lower rate. She noted that the reser- ves have been reduced. She asked at what point will the fee have to be raised? Ms. Kinzel replied that the fee may have to increase the year after next. (4?6) Conftlcated Property Trust Fund Ms. Ktnzel stated that this program is not supposed to be used for on going costs. She said that this program is for pilot programs or to supplement a pilot project. (508) Second Dollar Tratnlng In response to Commissioner Matthews, Ms. Kinzel explained that this two dollars is set aside from traffic citations for the training Page 27 June 17, 1994 of deputies and the related travel expenses. Tape #4 Commissioner Constantine asked what options were available regarding the bailiff program. Commissioner Volpe stated that he was unsure of what action the Board should take regarding the expanded courthouse security program. Ms. Kinzel stated that the Sheriff felt it was incumbent upon him to inform the Board of the potential security problem. She said that the Sheriff has met with the Judges and it was decided that the U.S. Marshal Service would do an analysis and make recommendations. She said that the additional $73,000.00 would provide certified deputies trained in courthouse security and weapons. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Kinzel stated that plan includes the video camera, capital elements of courthouse security as well as the operational components. Commissioner Constantine stated that the deputies would be throughout the courthouse building. Commissioner Volpe stated that this expanded program should be coordinated with the bailiff program to avoid the use of deputies at civil motion trials. Ms. Kinzel stated that a security survey is being prepared for all campus security. Com]uisstoner Volpe pointed out that the Jail and the Sheriff's Office is located on campus. He suggested that the result of the security survey should be obtained before any decision is made. Commissioner Norris agreed. He stated that the proposed budget should be left as it presently appears. Commissioner Volpe suggested that the current court security system be left in place until the results of the survey are presented. County Manager Dotrill remarked that the U.S. Marshal report needs to be substantiated. $"$ Racial: 2:20 PM - Reconvened: 2:40 PM At thil Deputy Clark Fernlay replaced Deputy Clerk Barbtretti (2?9) Cmpit&! (300 Page 28 Airport Authority June 17, 1994 Commissioner Norris stated that his support for the Marco Island Airport funding is contingent on the County obtaining title. Steve Price, Airport Authority Budget Committee Chairman, stated that the Airport Authority cannot obtain State grant without obtaining the title to the Marco Island Airport first. County Manager Dorrtll stated that the problem confronting the Airport Authority is the advancement of cash. He explained that the cash approved to be transferred to the Airport Authority is sufficient for the Immokalee Airport program and the design and permitting phase of the Everglades City and Marco Island Airports. Mr. Dotrill pointed out that if the Board wishes to proceed with the full advancement of the funds, the montes will need to be borrowed from the commercial paper program or line of credit. Commissioner Constantine indicated that the Board wishes to move forward. Commissioner Volpe stated that a long term revenue source for the operation of the airport system is necessary as well as an identifi- able repayment source which is the responsible business approach. John Drury, Airport Authority Director, stated that of the $4 million worth of work, $3 million will be refunded through airport grants by July 1995 of which the Board accepted $2.1 million in funds at the Board meeting on June 7, 1994 and is the reason behind short term borrowing. Commissioner Volpe questioned if a bank would loan money uti- lizing the airport grant monies due in July of 1995 as collateral? Mr. Dorrtll Indicated that the possibility exists that a bank would loan money against the airport grant funds due recognizing that the majority of major construction Is on a 90/10 split between the Florida Department of Transportation and Collier County. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Dorrtll stated that the preferred method is to borrow against the County's $25 million line of .'30 Page 29 June 17, 1994 credit given the relative short time in recovering the 90 percent reimbursement from the FDOT but the remaining ten percent (10~) will still need addressing. Mr. Price indicated that the County should assure that the $3 million in requested grants is approved before moving forward on the projects. He explained that the ability to repay the $1 million is contingent upon the success of the airport system and a good indi- cation of that success is that 14 of the proposed 18 hangars at the Immokalee Airport are already reserved without any type advertisement. Mr. Price stated that a loan repayment of approximately 12 to 15 years is realistic with an accelerated repayment capability. He pointed out that the funds which require 50 percent participation are items that are income producing almost immediately. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Drury informed that the State Aviation Office and the Economic Development Administration in Atlanta, GA, are the two sources for grants. He indicated that the FAA requires implementation of the master plans before participating in a funding program. Mr. Drury stated that the revenues will exceed expenditures once the revenue producing infrastructure ts installed at the airports. Mr. Drury indicated that extra revenue will be generated with the scheduling of special events similar to those conducted at the Naples Airport. Mr. Finn stated that the Airport Authority budget is balanced with $927,000 in ad valorem taxes which represents the County's share of the various projects as proposed by the Administrator. He pointed out that the County's portion of the total project, if funded, including pay-as-you-go funding, interest and five percent reserve, will be $1.259 million which will require an increase in ad valorem of approximately $330,000. Commissioner Volpe stated that borrowing against the existing line of credit is preferable. Mr. Smykowski stated that Staff needs direction as to whether the Page 30 June 17, 1994 Board wishes to fund the County's share of the grant match 100 percent with ad valorem or borrow the net difference of $332,000. Commissioner Matthews indicated that a variety of funding sources are available and should be investigated in order to move forward on the proposed projects with full funding because of the potential for generating large revenues while providing a valuable asset to Collier County. Gonunissioner Norris stated that he supports full funding con- tingent upon verification that the grants are obtained. (2030) Ad Valorem ~u]Tported CIP Ed Finn, Budget Analyst, stated that the total Capital Improvement Program, as funded, was $8,596,000 and the available funding for FY 95 is $1 million short because a portion of last year's CIP was funded through trust money which was returned to the general fund and was utilized for capital improvement purposes. Mr. Finn pointed out that of the remaining $7,596,500, the Campus Parking Debt utilizes $1,005,500. He indicated that the remaining funding uses are: Transfer to General Capital, $2,533,000, a 52.6 percent increase; Airport Capital Improvements Grant Match was $927,000 but needs revising; Transfer to Library Capital, $2?7,800; no proposed transfers in Museum Capital or Water Management Capital; Transfer to Parks Construction, $627,200; and Road CIP, $2,226,000. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Finn explained that the $2.3 million in Road CIP Funding is sales tax that otherwise would be ~n the General Fund. Mr. Finn indicated that the County-wide CIP fund (301) recom- mended projects total $3,035,400 and consist of 18 items including reserves, which are listed on Page 2 along with funding sources. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Finn indicated that the original request for air conditioning repairs was $304,000 and ~s now $185,200. He explained that the MIS Department is requesting replacement of two (2) units at a cost of $95,000; a boiler overhaul Page 31 June 17, 1994 at the County Jail is needed at a cost of $34,000; $10,000 for a steam oven and $46,200 for a CFC phase out insurance program. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Skip Camp, Facilities Management Director, stated that the MIS air conditioning units are 12 years old and are critical to keeping the computers cool. He explained that the $21,000 for electrical repair/replacement is for two (2) transfer switches, one for the Immokalee Health Department and one for the County Barn that need replacing because of age. Mr. Camp stated that the $80,000 for energy management improve- ments represents the placement of controls on the sixth, seventh and eighth floors of the Administration Building which should represent approximately $13,000 in annual energy savings. Mr. Camp indicated that the $39,200 allocated for campus improve- ments represents an area immediately fronting the Courthouse which is presently limerock and requires landscaping and repaving for add~- tional parking. He stated that the request also Includes additional lighting. Mr. Camp explained that the $153,000 for light retrofitting is the replacement of ballasts and more energy efficient bulbs in the Administration Building and the Sheriff's Building and represents a $26,900 reimbursement from Florida Power & Light in 4.2 years. Mr. Dotrill explained that the item for the new County main- tenance facility is for the expansion of the County barn facility. He stated that the present facility has been outgrown and has existed for 25 to 30 years. Mr. Dorrtll indicated that the proposed new facility will accommodate the County barn, the Sheriff's Office and will replace the water management chemical storage building. He pointed out that the budgeted $180,000 is for the purchase of land only. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Pro3ects Management Director, stated that 40 acres are needed for the new facility and the present site ls 10.3 acres. Mr. Conrecode indicated that there ~s the possibility of buying land presently owned by the County which was purchased for the land- Page 32 June 17, 1994 fill expansion and reimburse the Solid Waste fund. Commissioner Volpe stated that isolating the 40 acres within the 300 acres purchased for the landfill expansion may also address the concerns of the residents in the area. He questioned how many acres the County owns at the Immokalee Airport7 Mr. Conrecode indicated that there are 1,100 acres at the Immokalee Airport. Mr. Dotrill pointed out that 47 miles will have to be traveled each way Just to obtain simple routine maintenance by utilizinG land around the Immokalee Airport. Commissioner Constantine questioned the number of bays required in the garage taking into account sharing of the property with the Sheriff's Department? Mr. Conrecode informed the Board that multiple facilities are being considered with bay space at ground level and office/warehouse space on the second floor. He indicated that the occupants will include Water Management for spray equipment and chemical storage, Fleet Management, Sheriff's Department with their separate facility, Parks and Recreation, and Transportation which will include a yard for staging and storing materials. Commissioner Constantine recommended utilizing the existing 10 acre site by demolishing the existing building and constructing new facilities because what is being described will not require 40 acres. Mr. Conrecode stated that the possibility of utilizing the existing site has been discussed but a decision was made that the site is too cramped and the needs over the next 15 to 20 years was addressed which requires a substantially larger parcel. Mr. Conrecode indicated that consideration was also given to eventually selling the existing site because of the surroundinG resi- dential neighborhoods. Mr. Dotrill explained that to meet County Code requirements on the present site, a water retention lake will be required and con- sideration was given to the existence of multifamily condominiums June 17, 1994 south of the site and single family estate zoning across the road. Commissioner Constantine pointed out that the site north of the landfill is not appropriate either because of residential property surrounding that site as well. Commissioner Volpe stated that the Board of County Commissioners will have the opportunity to discuss where the property will be purchased when located. Mr. Dotrill stated that the Board of County Commissioners needs to decide whether to substantially rebuild the existing County barn facility and site to meet the immediate needs or address the long term needs by purchasing a larger site. It was the consensus of the Board to fund the $180,000 to purchase land for a new County maintenance facility. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Dotrill explained that the $150,000 for Jail/Building A Design entails an alternative proposal. He ~ndicated that the Growth Management Plan contemplated a General Obligation Bond referendum to add 322 cells to the existing Jail and planning for the referendum needs to be initiated soon. Mr. Dorrill stated that if sufficient interest is expressed by the Board for the alternative which is a daily release facility at a fraction of the cost of expanding the maximum security Ja~l, the alternative can be ~ncluded on the referendum. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that former City of Naples Mayor Ed Putzell has discussed the daily release facility concept with each of the Board members and he thought the facility was to be privately funded. Mr. Putzell explained that the project can be privately funded on a loan arrangement over a five (5) year period. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Putzel] stated that the private sector does not have the $150,000 for the County to utilize for design of the facility because the concept has not been approved in principal which is required before soliciting donations. Mr. Putzell pointed out that citizens who have been convicted of Page 34 June 17, 1994 misdemeanors and third degree felonies do not belong in Jail and a positive alternative is a work release/restitution/treatment type center. He explained that the Inhabitants of the facility will be on a work release program during the day and pay $10 or $11 per day for room and board. Commissioner Volpe stated that he supports the concept and the indirect benefit of the General Obligation Bond referendum will be lettinG the citizens decide whether they want to spend $19 million to build 204 new cells or only 100 cells with the ~nit~ation of the alternative program. Mr. Putzell indicated that approximately 25 percent of the Jail population could be housed in a da~ly release type facility. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Putzell stated that the proposed facility will house 110 men and women and the estimated construction cost is $2.1 million. Mr. Putzell pointed out that a great advantage of this type faci- lity is the treatment aspect which will keep the offenders employed while assisting in eliminating the problem. He explained that the project has been worked on in great detail by Kraft Construction and a number of architects as well as being reviewed by the County's Off~ce of Capital Projects Management. Mr. Dotrill explained that the $150,000 needs to be funded for prelim~nary design because the County is obligated to supply addi- tional Jail beds. Mr. Dotrill stated that August 2, 1994 is the final day to order the ballots if a General Obligation Bond issue referendum is to be part of the November general election. He pointed out that the next opportunity will be the March 1996 presidential primary unless a spe- cial election is deemed necessary which is expensive. Commissioner Norris indicated that he supports the concept. There being no further business for the good of the Gounty, the Workshop was adjourned by order of the Chair - Time: $:40 PM. Page 35