Loading...
BCC Minutes 09/06/1994 RNaples, Florida, September 6, 1994 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Timothy J. Constantine VICE-CHAIRMAN: Betrye 3. Matthews John C. Norris Michael J. Volpe Burr L. Saunders ALSO PRESENT: Martlyn Fernley, Ellte Hoffman and Sue Barbirettt, Deputy Clerks; Neil Dorrtll, County Manager; BIll Hargett, Assistant County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects Management Director; Stan Litsinger, Growth Management Chief; Jeff Perry, Chief Transportation Planner; Fred Bloetscher, OCPM Project Manager; Wayne Arnold, Acting Site Development Review Director; Dick Clark, Interim Community Development Services Administrator; Bob Mulhere, Acting Current Planning Manager; Mike McNeee, Acting Utilities Administrator; Mike Smykowskt, Acting Budget Director; Margaret Bowlee, Growth Management Planner; Adolfo Gonzalez, OCPM Project Manager; Sgt Rosa Hernandez-Whtte, Collier County Shertff's Office; and Sue Ftlson, Administrative Assistant to the Board. Page I September 6, 1994 Tape #l (36) Item #2 AGEND& - AFPROVED WITH CHANGES Cosaissioner Matthews moved, seconded by Commissioner Norris and carried 4/0 (Commissioner Volpe out), to approve the agenda with the changes as detailed on the Agenda Change Sheet, and the following additional items: I. Item #SD1 - Sterling Oaks Water Main Utilities Upslzing Agreement. 2. Item #14B - Discussion regarding yard waste pick up schedule. Page 2 September 6, 1994 (zgs) Item #2A CONSENT AGENDA - APPROVED AND/OR ADOPTED The motion for approval of the consent agenda is noted under Item #16. (199) Item #3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF JULY 26, AUGUST 2, AUGUST 9, AND AUGUST 16, 1994 - APPROVED Commissioner Matthews moved, seconded by Commissioner Norris and carried &/0 (Commissioner Volpe out), to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of July 26, August 2, August 9, ~nd August 16, 1994. (212) Item ZMPLOYEB SERVICE AWARDS - PRESENTED Commissioner Matthews congratulated the following employee for service with Collier County Government: Mike McNees - 10 Years, Utility Services Ralph Reissue - 10 Years, Community Development John Augustyn - 10 Years, Utility Services Judi Budins - 10 Years, Public Services Admin. Joseph DeLate- 5 Years, Community Development James Maulden - 5 Years, Environmental Services Kimberley Polen - 5 Years, Natural Resources Robert Mulhere - 5 Years, Planning John Lucrezi - 5 Years, Water Operations (312) Item #4C1 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER 1994 AS CHILDHOOD CANCER AWARENESS MONTH - ADOPTED Presented Not Presented Presented Presented Presented Not Presented Presented Presented Presented Upon reading of the Proclamation, Commissioner maunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Norris and carried 4/0 (Commissioner Volpe out), that the Proclamation designating the month of September 1994 ms Childhood Cancer Awareness Month be adopted. Proclamation accepted by Karen McLean, Candlelighters of Southwest Florida, Inc. Page 3 September 6, 1994 (4os) Item #4C2 PROCLAMATION DESIGNATING SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 1994 AS COLLIER COUNTY ESTUARY DAY AND BEACH CLF~aI-UP DAY - ADOPTED Upon reading of the Proclamation, Commissioner Norris moved, seconded b~ Commissioner Matthews and carried 4/0 (Commissioner Volpe out), that the Proclamation designating Saturday, September 17, 1994 as Collier Count7 Estuar~ Day and Beach Clean-Up Day be adopted. Proclamation accepted by Ellis Krier, The Conservancy. Page 4 September 6, 1994 Item BUDGET ANKN/N4Err8 94-596, 9&-613, 94-618, 94-620/622, 94-624 AND 94-626 - ADOPTED Acting Budget Director Mike Smykowski requested adoption of eight {8) routine Budget Amendments as shown in the Executive Summary. In response to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Smykowski indicated that Budget Amendment 94-622 represents the water/sewer master plan project which was funded in Fund 301 so water/sewer monies are not being transferred into another fund. Commissioner Matthews stated that Budget Amendment 94-626 trans- fers $38,000 from building acquisition into engineering fees and construction and questioned what building is no longer planned to be acquired? County Manager Dotrill explained that funds appropriated by the Board for a number of small projects will be placed into a single line item which is then broken out as the projects begin to develop. Mr. Smykowski mentioned that boat ramps are planned for the Bayview Park Expansion Project but no buildings. Tom Conrecode, OCPM Director, stated that additional parking and boat lane expansion is planned at Bayview Park but no operating line item was established to be charged for the engineering and construc- t]on management. Mr. Dotrill stated that this item may have been better budgeted as a miscellaneous capital improvement rather than giving the impression that a building was being added. Cosmieeioner Matthews moved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe and carried unanimously, that Budget Amendments 9&-596, 94-613, 94-618, 94-620/622, 94-624 and 9&-626 be adopted. (670) CLMRK'S RF~ORT - NO ACTION TAKEN Commissioner Constantine stated that the Clerk's Report is for informational purposes only. September 6, I994 (673) Item JOHN CURSOY, PRESIDENT OF GULF COAST SKIMMERS WATER SKI SNOW, INC. REGARDING A SIGN VARIANCE - STAFF TO PRESENT VARIANCE APPLICATION FOR BOARD REVIEW AS SOON AS POSSIBLE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAYMENT OF THE VARIANCE FEES TO ALLOW THE SIGNS TO LEGALLY REMAIN IN-PLACE John Cursoy, President of Gulf Coast Skimmers Water Ski Show, stated that he rounded the Gulf Coast Skimmers Organization which is an educational process to get the youth of Collier County involved in operating a business. Dustin Beatty, 14 year old student at Lely High School, read the following credo for the Gulf Coast Skimmers: The Gulf Coast Skimmers Water Ski Show Team is dedicated to deliver the finest amateur water ski show emphasizing whole- some traditional family values. The show will serve as a vehicle to teach financially challenged kids how to water ski. The adults will serve as upstanding role models and be prepared to communicate life experiences. The Gulf Coast Skimmers will be perceived by the public, the media sponsors and kids as one of the finest civic outreach programs in Collier County. In addition, maintaining harmony with our immediate neighbors will be top priority. Finally, no indi- vidual or nothing is more important than the reputation and integrity of the Gulf Coast Skimmers Water Ski Show. Shane Matthews, 14 year old freshman at Lely High School, stated that Avalon Lake where the Gulf Coast Skimmers Water Ski Show Team performs cannot be seen from U.S. 41 so two (2) signs were erected to direct people to the show. He explained that the signs are placed at Ted's Shed at the corner of U.S. 41 and Outer Drive and at the inter- section of Airport Road and U.S. 41. Dustin Beatty indicated that in January, Marathon 0il Company gave the Gulf Coast Skimmers Water Ski Show Team permission to place an 8'x4' sign on the property in exchange for maintaining the pro- perty, i.e. mow the yard, pick up trash and paint the building. He stated that the owner of Ted's Shed gave permission to place the same size sign beneath his business sign. Dustin mentioned that John Wilver, previously with Community Development, was contacted and per- mission for placement of the signs was granted. He explained that Jim Sommers of the Florida Department of Transportation also gave per- mission for placement of the signs. Page 6 September 6, 1994 Christy Miller, 9 year old student at Golden Terrace Elementary School, stated that 64 percent of the people who attend the Ski Show is generated from the two (2) signs and if the signs are too small, no one will be able to see them because they are not very close to the road. She explained that when people arrive at the Ski Show, they are asked how they heard about the show and she marks the responses down on a survey sheet which is then calculated to determine the percen- tages. Christy stated that the second largest percentage of people hear about the show from word-of-mouth. Christy requested that the signs be allowed to remain in-place, the one (1) sign that was taken down be replaced and that the fee not be charged for the signs because more kids can learn to ski with the money. Mr. Gutsoy explained that the fee Christy refers to is the sign variance fee because the cost per child to learn to water sk~ is 890.00 per year. Commissioner Constantine stated that the program obviously bene- fits the kids of the community and a verbal agreement with County Staff exists and questioned if the issue can be legally addressed? County Attorney Cuyler indicated that the Board has the authority to grant relieve on the sign variance fee but a public hearing should be held to allow for public comment prior to granting a sign variance. Commissioner Saunders pointed out that one of the signs is down at this time and questioned if the sign can be reerected prior to the public hearing and granting of a variance? County Manager Dotrill stated that the Board needs to authorize the variance petition, authorize a budget transfer for payment of the fee on behalf of the Ski Show with public funds, and direct Staff to reerect the sign if that is the Board's desire. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Wayne Arnold, Acting Development Plan Review Director, informed that the variance applica- tion fee is $425 and one petition can cover both signs. He explained that the County's concern was brought about by a complaint regarding Page 7 September 6, 1994 the size of the sign which by Code can be no larger than 12 square feet and the signs in question are 32 square feet. Co~aiesioner Norris moved, macondad by Commissioner Matthews and carried unanimously, that Staff bring the variance application back to the Board as soon as possible meeting the requirements for public advertising, provide different avenues for payment of the variance fee, and allow the signs to remain in-place if legally possible. (1108) Iten #eel COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION REPRESENTING ARTHUR R. LEE, CHAIRMAN OF THE COLLIER COUNTY HISTORIC AND ARCHA£OLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD, REQUESTING THE HOARD TO SIGN AN AGREEMENT FOR CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT - APPROVED Bob Mulhere, Acting Current Planning Manager, stated that this item is the final step in Collier County becoming a Florida Certified Local Government and the Agreements now require approval and the Chatrman's signature. Cmtesioner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews and carried 4/0 (Commissioner maunders out), that the Certified Local Government Agreement be approved for signature. ,,- 0(]0,,.... Page S September 6, 1994 Item #8A2 FISCAL YEAR 1994 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT ON PUBLIC FACILITIES (AUIR) AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 1.2 OF THE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES ORDINANCE NO. 93-82, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 94-1 - APPROVED WITH STIPULATION AND PURSUANT TO STAFF RECOW~arDATIONS AS LISTED IN THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Stan Litsinger, Growth Management Chief, stated that Staff will address Category A public facilities which are concurrency require- ments and Category B public facilities which are required but not con- currency driven. Mr. Litsinger explained that revenues required to fund the CIE projects proposed in the AUIR for the FY 95-99 planning period and maintain etatutorily mandated financial feasibility of the CIE have previously been enacted by the Board of County Commissioners. Mr. Litsinger stated that after the presentation for each faci- lity type, Staff is requesting a motion and vote by the Board to accept the AUIR as presented; direction by separate motion and vote on each facility type; and to find that upon analysis, review and actions taken that adequate Category A public facilities will be available to support issuance of development orders in a twelve month period. Mr. Litsinger etated that County and State Roads are broken into seven (7) categories as listed on Page 7 of the Executive Summary. Mr. Litsinger stated that Staff is requesting approval to include the projects appearing on Page 17 of the Executive Summary as a Capital Improvement Element amendment at a public hearing scheduled for the Board of County Commissioners meeting of September 27, 1994. Mr. Litsinger indicated that County Arterial and Collector Roads, Category A, revenues indicate an approximate $3 million surplus over a five (51 yea'r period with an expenditure of $103,197,O00 in capital road projects. Mr. Litsinger pointed out that all roads appearing on the ten (10) year road plan starting on Page 17 of the Executive Summary have been previously reviewed and directed to be included in the CIE and Staff is recommending the inclusion of new projects which appear on Page 9 September 6, 1994 Page 18 as CIE Project No. 64 through 70. He indicated that contrary to recent Board action, Staff is requesting that Vanderbilt Beach Road between Gulf Shore and U.S. 41 be included because of concurrency and to include advance funding for U.S. 41 east from Airport Road to Rattlesnake Hammock Road while concurrently seeking a temporary level of service standard adjustment. Commissioner Constantine stated that it was his understanding that Vanderbllt Beach Road between Gulf Shore and U.S. 41 was not con- currency driven. Mr. Litsinger disclosed that the section of Vanderbilt Beach Road between U.S. 41 and Gulf Shore has been concurrency driven for some time but the Board elected to remove the project and transfer the funds to Vanderbilt Beach Road between U.S. 41 and Goodlette. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Litsinger remarked that a reanalysis of traffic counts and conditions on the roadway con- firm that the road Is deficient under the current level of service standards. Transportation Services Administrator Archibald stated that traf- fic counts were performed between the entrances of the shopping center at the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and U.S. 41 and at Vanderbilt Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road with both counts confirming the volume of traffic in that corridor creates a concurrency problem (a daily traffic count of 12,110 versus a 12,000 allowable capacity). He indi- cated that the project was extended to 1996/1997 thus placing the project outside the concurrency timeframe. Mr. Litsinger pointed out that a $3 million surplus has been pro- Jected by Staff including the Vanderbllt Beach Road project west from U.S. 41 and Staff recommends retaining the project in the CIE and moving forward on same. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Litsinger contributed the estimated surplus funds to receiving revenues at a higher rate than anticipated such as impact fees and gas taxes. He announced that a more detail audit of carry forward funds from last year verified addi- Page 10 September 6, 1994 ttonal unobllgated monies. Mr. Litsinger informed the Board that the listing of projects on Pages 17 and 18 of the Executive Summary does not suggest any priori- tizing but only indicates the time at which the project became a CIE item back as far as 1989. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Litsinger identified the Goodland Bridge Repair as being necessary but not concurrency driven; the magnitude of the project and safety factor involved lead Staff to recommend including same in the ClE. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that only Category A projects require the County to move forward with the project or find an alter- native and questioned the necessity of including non-compelling projects within Category A. Mr. Litsinger stated that last year during discussions relative to the imposition of additional gas tax, the Board decided that pro- Jects which were not concurrency driven would not be included in the CIB. He explained that this year the Board will have to make a simi- lar decision. Commissioner Volpe questioned what the surplus would be if the Board removed those projects from the CIE which are not concurrency driven? Mr. Litsinger identified the following projects as not being con- currency driven: CIE Project No. 23, Vanderbtlt Beach Road from U.S. 41 to Airport Road at $6.5 million; CIE Project No. 21, Livingston Road from Imperial Street to Immokalee ROad at $774,000; CIE Project No. 59, North 11th Street in Immokalee at $159,000; and CIE Project No. 70, Goodland Bridge Repair at $443,000. Commissioner Matthews stated that the County has no choice but to proceed with the Goodland Bridge Repair because of the safety issue. In response to Commissioner Saundere, Mr. Litsinger explained that Staff is recommending funding of the non-concurrency driven pro- Jects because they are within the. funding cash stream available in the next five [5) year pertod~ Page 11 September 6, 1994 Commissioner Constantine pointed out that a number of people who either live on Vanderbllt Beach Road west of U.S. 41 or in the imme- diate area spoke in favor of not proceeding with the widening and he is not prepared to change the decision today without any represen- tation of the homeowners. Mr. Litsinger pointed out that under the current concurrency ordinance and State statutes, the Board must either move forward with the improvement to Vanderbilt Beach Road west of U.S. 41 or address the issue with alternatives available which are a request to lower the level of service standard to "F' from the Department of Community Affairs or the Board can initiate an Area of Significant Influence (ASI) for that segment of roadway in accordance with the criteria con- tained in the Adequate Public Facility Ordinance while attempting to achieve a lower level of service standard. Mr. Litsinger requested that Staff be directed to include the AUIR in the CIE public hearing process at which time the Board can hear public input and make a final policy decision and also to prepare an amendment for a level of service adjustment but pointed out that a level of service adjustment will be difficult to obtain. Commissioner Saunders indicated that a public hearing is necessary in order to address the Vanderbilt Beach Road west of U.S. 41 issue and the residents in the area must be notified. Mr. Litsinger explained that an ASI is a moratorium area and would encompass one (1} mile from each end of the roadway and one (1) mile on each side. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Litsinger informed the Board that the Pelican Bay Development of Regional Impact (DRI) was vested prior to the Growth Management Act so development within Pelican Bay cannot be stopped by an ASI. He indicated that the most affected areas would be the undeveloped lots in Naples Park and Pelican Marsh. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Litsinger Indicated that no developer commitments exist west of U.S. 41 on Vanderbilt Beach Page 12 September 6, 1994 Road to assist with the project. Commissioner Norris questioned the projected surplus prior to including the non-concurrency items? Bill Hargett, Assistant County Manager, stated a previous projec- tion did not exist for the 1994 surplus, Commissioner Saunders pointed out that the only issue the Board Is struggling with this year is the stretch of road on Vanderbllt Beach Road west from U.S. 41 which can be addressed during the public hearing process. Mr. Litsinger stated that if Staff is directed to not include the Vanderbilt Beach Road project in the AUIR as required by Ordinance, a public hearing on a projected ASI encompassing the road segment must be held. Commissioner Saunders suggested that the AUIR be approved as pre- sented with the exception of the Vanderbilt Beach Road segment and Staff schedule a public hearing as soon as possible with proper noti- fication to affected residents. County Attorney Cuyler explained that the public hearing can be the public hearing which must be scheduled for approval of the ClE and then action can be taken to address the Vanderbilt Beach Road issue if not approved as part of the CIE. Mr. Litsinger indicated that under ASI requirements, the map of the proposed ASI area must be published in the newspaper and notifica- tion sent to affected property owners which Is a costly undertaking. He explained that if the AUIR is approved as presented, then the Vanderbilt Beach Road segment will be included in the ClE public hearing scheduled for Board of County Commissioners review on September 27, 1994, thereby eliminating the unnecessary extra cost of the ASI process with the same end result. Mr. Litsinger stated that Staff can Include as part of the Executive Summary all ramifications of the decisions available to the Board on the Vanderbtlt Beach Road segment from U.S. 41 west. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that the Board must also decide Page 13 September 6, 1994 whether to include in the AUIR the non-concurrency driven items. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Jeff Perry, Chief Transportation Planner, explained that the $1 million per year for right-of-way acquisition Is required by the Growth Management Plan in the Traffic Circulation Element which is why it appears in the Capital Improvement Elemenl. He indicated that this requirement allows the County to purchase property under voluntary sale well in advance of project start, thus avoiding condemnation proceedings. Mr. Perry stated that If a project is within the five (5) year work program and is under design and preliminary engineering work, advance right-of-way acquisition does not apply. Mr. Perry explained that Livingston Road between Inunokalee Road and Pine Ridge Road, where preliminary engineering funds fall within the five (5) year period but construction Is outside the five (5) year timeframe, the realignment of S.R. 951 to the west and the extension north to Bontta Springs which are in the planning stages are sample projects which would be eligible for advance right-of-way acquisitions. Commissioner Volpe indicated that concurrency driven Issues need to be addressed and the $1 million budgeted for advance right-of-way acquisition does not apply. He explained that maybe $500,000 would be more appropriate if an amount is required. In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. Litsinger explained that Vanderbtlt Beach Road west is concurrency driven and Vanderbilt Beach Road two (2) laning from U.S. 41 to Airport Road is not a concurrency Issue in the five (5) year planning period but the Board decided to move forward with the project. He Indicated that Staff recommends that both sections be addressed and revenues are available for both. Commissioner Matthews pointed that the Board decided to move for- ward with two (2) lanln9 of Vanderbilt Beach Road from U.S. 41 to Goodlette Road even though the project is not concurrency driven but four (4) lantng appears in the AUIR. Transportation Servicee Administrator Archibald explained that Page 14 September 6, 1994 Staff is moving forward with obtaining environmental permits and attempts to allow expansion up to six (6) lanes are being made because of constraints. He indicated that Staff may recommend proceeding with four (4) laning because the roadway will be a new corridor in which four (4) laning can be completed at approximately the same cost as two (2) laning. Mr. Cuyler explained that the Board can choose not to approve the Vanderbllt Beach Road segment west of U.S. 41 which will create cum- bersome procedures at an early stage or the issue can be addressed at the ClE public hearing which will require approval of the AUIR as presented. Commissioner Volpe questioned what the intersection improvements at Pine Ridge Road entailed? Mr. Archibald stated that the intersection improvements at Pine RIdge Road is in conjunction with the six (6) lanlng project of Airport Road and Is concurrency driven. He explained that Staff Is also Identifying improvements at 1-75 and Pine Ridge Road which Is operationally deficient. Commissioner Volpe questioned whether the $3 million surplus can be utilized to retire some of the commercial paper debt? Mr. Hargett explained that the $3 million surplus could be applied to the commercial paper debt but does not recommend utilizing the funds for same. He stated that the projected surplus does not contain provisions for construction bid variances or projects with no contingencies. Mr. Hargett stated that a $1 million principal pay down per year exists on the commercial paper debt. Mr. Litsinger pointed out that Staff ts requesting direction to Include the figures and project costs In the tIE public hearing pro- cess but the appropriation of any available revenue surpluses can be decided upon by the Board at any time. Commissioner Saunders moved. seconded by Commissioner Norris and carried unanimously, that the AUIR be approved as presented by Staff Page September 6, 199& but that the section of Vanderbllt Beach Road from U.S. &l to the Gulf of Mexico be red flagged for additional public comment and discussion which will occur at the CIE hearing. Mr. Perry stated that should the Board choose not to include the Vanderbilt Beach Road project from U.S. 41 to the Gulf of Mexico in the Capital Improvement Element, Staff will need direction to either submit an amendment to the Growth Management Act changing the level of service or proceed with an ASI. Commissioner Constantine pointed out that changing the level of service is preferable. Mr. Litsinger indicated that the ordinance requires that an ASI be established while seeking formal approval of the amendment to lower the level of service. He stated that both scenarios wtll be presented to the Board at the CIE public hearing. see Recessed 10:35 A.M. - Reconvened 11:00 A.M. at which time Deputy Clerk Hoffman replaced Deputy Clerk Fernley sea (3265) Growth Management Chief Litsinger requested clarification on the previous motion. Commissioner Saunders stated that the intent of the motion is to approve the entire AUIR, with the one item being "red flagged". Mr. Litsinger recommended that staff be directed to include all other identified projects in the AUIR in the upcoming CIE; and that the Board has found, upon analysis, review and actions taken based on the FY 94 AUIR that adequate Category "A' public facilities will be available, as defined by the Collier Concurrency Management System, as implemented by the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, to support development order issuance until presentation of the FY 95 AUIR approximately 12 months from this date. Commissioner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews and carried unanimously, to approve etafits recommendation as sug2ested by Mr. Litsinger as reflected in Items #2 and #3 of the Executive · Sunmary. Page 16 September 6, 1994 (3370) %teml8&3 GRANT CONTRACT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM ENACTED BY TH~ 1994 FLORIDA STATH LEGISLATURE - APFROVED WITH CHANGES AS AMENDED Growth Management Chief Litsinger stated that this item is a request for the Board to enter into a contract with the Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and receive $20,000 in EAR grant funds. He indicated that staff is recommending that the contract be entered into with the changes as referenced on Page 2 of Exhibit "B". Mr. Litsinger advised that since the distribution of the agenda packets, he received a communication from DCA suggesting an additional sentence at the end of the Paragraph which begins "The Department recognizes that in consideration of the fact that .... He read the language to be added as follows: "Not withstanding this qualification such working drafts shall be consistent with this requirement stated herein." Co~aleeloner Norris moved, secondedby Commissioner Matthews and carried unanimously, to approve the EAR grant contract with changes as - avo~sd. Page September 6, 1994 Tape #2 Item #8H9 REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE OF COUNTY BY THE TASE FORCE FOR TEE HOMELESS RE THE RELOCATION OF ST. MATTHKW'S HOUSE - INDUSTRIAL SITES DEEMED TO BE MOR~ COMPATIBLE FOR THIS USE; BUILDING PERMIT FEES TO BE TRANSFERRED TO APPROPRIATE SITE APPROVED BY BCC Commissioner Constantine explained that anytime an item comes before the Board for a conditional use, the Commission is acting in a quasi Judicial manner and may not talk about that specific item prior to the public hearing. He pointed out that during the public hearing for a conditional use, the Board is to make decisions based solely on the evidence presented in that public hearing. Commissioner Constantine advised that today's discussion should include generalities about the potential or possibilities for St. Matthew's House, however, within the scope of the current law, speci- fics cannot be heard, i.e. as to why or why not the Binwood site should be approved. County Attorney Cuyler advised that the advertised public hearing provides the opportunity for interested persons to speak on any speci- fic land use item. County Manager Dotrill stated that he was asked to sit on a panel to provide information from the County's perspective with regard to the desire of the Board of Directors of St. Matthews to seek an alternative site for the current site which is owned at the entrance to the Glades Subdivision. He reported that a contract has been offered to acquire the site on Llnwood Avenue, however, there are a number of questions with respect to assistance. Mr. Dorrtll announced that a request is being made for the Board to consider waiving or allowing a transfer of previously paid fees for the review of site development plans, building permit application. the required conditional use application and the fees associated with the necessary public hearing to consider a rezoning for the homeless site and soup kitchen. Mr. Dotrill called attention to the seven requests of the TFFTH Page 18 Randy Graham Kristi Cleaves Vivian Stuart George Attewell Earl Marlin Elaine Young September 6, 1994 Trustees, as reflected in the Executive Summary and Staff's response to same. In answer to Commissioner Constantine, County Manager Dorrill indicated that the fees associated with the site development plan is $667.50; conditional use application $800; administrative request to issue extensions to the currently valid building permits would be 10~ of the original permit fee or $100, whichever is greater, not to exceed $500. The following persons spoke with regard to this item: Susan Bartholf Robert Carroll Joanne Kohlhagen R. E. Straitill Darwin Brandt Commissioner Saunders questioned whether there is a possibility of revisiting the industrial site off Airport Road for the relocatlon of St. Natthew's House. He pointed out that this site is not near any residences and would not create the types of problems that have been cited. Reverend Michael Collins replied that the Board of Directors of St. Matthew's House has instructed the Task Force to move forward on the proposed site. Commissioner Saunders asked if a message could be conveyed to the Board of Directors that an industrial site is far more acceptable than Linwood Avenue, the Glades, or other areas surrounded by residences. Reverend Collins remarked that he will carry that message to the Board of Directors, if it is the desire of the Commission. Commissioner Saunders stated that there is some distance between the labor pool and the industrial park. He recalled that a suggestion was made that sufficient funds could be raised to purchase one or two vans to transport these people to the labor pools which would elimi- nate the problem of getting people to work. Reverend Collins explained that transportation is not the key issue, and noted there is a difference of $250,000 between some of the Page 19 September 6, 1994 properties that have recently been considered. Commissioner Norris indicated that attempting to operate a soup kitchen near a residential area will continue to create problems. He affirmed that it is time for St. Matthew's Board to recognize that they have a responsibility not only to the homeless, but more impor- tantly, to the citizens of the County. He suggested that an industrial location be procured. Commissioner Saunders cited that the population growth in Collier County is moving further east and north. He pointed out in five years, the industrial site will be more centrally located than the Linwood site. Commissioner Volpe stated that he concurs with the issues that are being addressed with regard to compatibility. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Reverend Collins advised that 45~ of the meals served are pantry meals which means these are residents of the community who come in to receive help. He pointed out that 30~ of the meals served are for people coming in from the street. He remarked that referrals from the Sheriff's Office and churches are also accommodated. Responding to Commissioner Constantine, County Attorney Cuyler stated that without making a decision on any conditional use petition, the Board has Indicated that industrial sites are more compatible sites in general. Reverend Collins advised that he will take that consensus back to his Board. He noted that he is trying to work with the Commission and the community. Mr. Dotrill reported that the Task Force and its Board request that the Commission waive or provide a separate funding mechanism for a site to be considered at the discretion of the Board of DIrectors of St. Matthew's House In an effort to move the site from its current location at the Glades. He indicated that there wtll be a cost of approximately $1,500 for the three items he discussed earlier in his presentation. Page 20 September 6, 1994 Commissioner Norris proposed, that if in the future, St. Matthew's will be going through the process at an alternative location, he will assume the responsibility of raising the funds to pay for the addi- tional costs himself. County Attorney Cuyler advised that the permit fees could be transferred In whole. Commissioner Harthews suggested that the Commission commit to the transfer of the permit fees and urge St. Matthew's House to look at another site. Cmissioner Natthews moved, seconded by Commissioner Norris and carried unanimously, to transfer the building permit fees to the appropriate site that Is selected by St. Matthew's House and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. with regard to the timeclock of the building permit, County Manager Dorrtll announced that based on the current Code, he would administratively extend the permits, however, if the time period is beyond 180 days, St. Matthew's House would have to petition the Board. (1750) Itgs#BB1 RECOiegEND&TIOR TO ESTABLISH A COUNTY POLICY OR THE DESIGN&TION OF ROADMAYLANDSCAPE PROJECTS FOR EITHER COUNTY-WIDE OR DISTRICT DESIGN, OPERATIO~ AND NAINTENANCE - STAFF TO ESTABLISH NORE THOROUGH CRITERIA AND COME BACK IN 75 DAYS Transportation Services Administrator Archibald stated that this Item deals with policy issues relating to the landscaping of arterial roadways. He advised that the County currently has approximately 10 miles of roadways that are landscaped at an annual maintenance cost of $425,000. Mr. Archibald reported that the amount of activity will increase in the future and there could be approximately 30 miles of roadways to be landscaped within a five year period. He Indicated that staff is anticipating the development of a five year plan In cooperation with Collier Naplescape. Mr. Archibald explained that.Collier Naplescape has done a lot of .o,, 000,,. 1;i Page 21 September 6, 1994 master planning and they are in the process of developing preliminary design information. He noted that staff is in the process of deve- loping a policy outlining the signature roadways for improvements, operating and maintenance cost of same for a five year time period, and identifying funding scenarios. Mr. Archibald suggested returning to the Board with approximately six funding scenarios for different roadways depending on the benefits identified and coordinated with Collier Naplescape. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Archibald replied that staff is recommending a taxing district concept in lieu of an assessment district concept. In answer to Commissioner Matthews, Mr. Archibald stated that the criteria for each of the sub-headings under signature roadways was based upon a study that was undertaken by Gall Boorman & Associates in 1988. He explained that this report attempted to provide definitions for sub-headings under signature roadways. Mr. Archibald suggested that signature roadways be identified that would have a community-wide benefit. He noted that the next step would be to divide those signature roadways into districts that may be less than county-wide. He indicated if the findings are that the majority of these are county-wide, a county-w/de district could be considered. Commissioner Matthews stated that she would like to see the con- cept of the established criteria carried a little farther than what it appears to be right now. She suggested that there be more epecificity to identify the roads in each category. Commissioner Matthews moved, seconded by Commissioner Norris that · staff be directed to establish more thorough criteria and report beck in 75 dmy,. Responding to Commissioner Vo/pe, Mr. Archibald revealed that staff will provide a breakdown with regard to the taxing system for each road corridor that is defined. Conunieetoner Constantine cited that there are 27 sidewalk/bike ,.o,'OOO,,. Page 22 September 6, 1994 paths within the County without funding and these are In neighborhoods where children are walking and riding bicycles to school. He indi- cated from a safety standpoint, providing bikepaths for the children should be a priority before continuing to plant flowers along the roadways. Upon call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. (2520) ltem#SD1 STZRLING OAKS WATER NAXN UTILITIES UPSIZING AGREENENT - APPROVED Acting Utilities Administrator McNees stated that this item Is a request for approval of an upstzlng agreement. He advised that In order to serve a particular development, a developer needed an 8" or 10" water line along a route where the County proposed a 16" water main as part of the master plan. Mr. McNees affirmed that the developer has agreed to construct the 16" main. He requested that the Board reimburse the developer of Sterling Oaks $150,O00 which is the difference between an 8" or 10" water main and the 16" water main. Commissioner Norris moved, seconded by Cosstssloner Saunders and carried unanimously, to approve the upstztng agreement between the developers of Sterling Oaks and the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Commissioner Matthews remarked that the Board Is being asked to approve an agreement that has essentially gone forward. Cmsslssloner Harthews moved, seconded by Co--tssioner Norris and carried unanimously, that staff be directed to present agreements to the iosrd prior to construction. 00, 000,,'.: 16 Page 23 ( 2740 ) September 6, 1994 DISTRICT 2 NULTI-FANILY RECYCLING PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY IP~WOKALEE DISPOSAL, INC. - APPROV~D Environmental Services Administrator Lorenz stated that this Item Is a recommendation for approval of the District 2 multi-family recycling proposal submitted by Immokalee Disposal, Inc. He noted that this would extend the multi-family program to 2,700 dwelling units in District 2. Commissioner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Nattheses and carried unanimously, to approve the multi-family recycling proposal from Issokalee Disposal, Inc. and staff be directed to take all appropriate actions to implement the program. $s$ Depoty Clerk Barblretti replaced Deputy Clerk Hoffman at this time. ass (2852) item #SH1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS NANAGENENT AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH THE RADIO ROll) PHASE II OUTFALL SWALE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENT ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION IN ADVANCE OF THE ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION - STAFF REC~ATION ACCEPTED Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Projects Management DIrector, stated that this petition is a request for authorization to implement the construction of Radio Road Phase II outfall drainage swale although the construction of the roadway Is not anticipated in the current five year window. He said that the benefits to be gained by proceeding with this portion of work at this time will be the avoidance of the risk of permitting under a more stringent future per- mit requirement demanding higher mitigation costs and acquire the easements while they are still undeveloped and available. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conrecode replied that this cost center for this project was included in the AUIR that was adopted this morning. He said it includes a carry forward for the current fiscal year. ~lssloner Norris moved to accept Staff recomndatton, seconded blF Commissioner Saunder, and carried unanimously. ,,oo, 0O0,, , 54 Page 24 SeptenbeF 6, 1994 (2976) Item #8H2 IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN ELEMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. 91-385 ESTABLISHING A MITIGATION PROJECT TO MEET ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION CAPITAL PROJECTS - STAFF DIRECTED TO RECOGNIZE PROJECTS OUTLINED IN EXHIBIT II, PURSUE MITIGATION HOLDING AREA IN CREW AREA, PREPARE GRANT APPLICATION AUTHORIZE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN A COVER LETTER TO ACCOMPANY SAID APPLICATION WHICH INCLUDES A STATEMENT AUTHORIZING CERTAIN OCRM STAFF AS THE "KEY CONTACT" PERSON Adolfo Gonzalez, OCPM Project Manager, stated that in 1991 the BCC adopted Resolution 91-385 establishing a long term mitigation program. He said that the petition presented today will recognize the projects eligible for environmental permitting program and prepare a grant application for the use of Preservation 2000 funds which will double the amount of land that can be purchased. Commissioner Constantine stated that he is not sure that he wants to include the Belle Meads area because this Board voted to recommend to the State that the area not be bought. He stated that he would rather concentrate on the CREW area. Commissioner Constantine pointed out that Lee County purchased land to land bank for mitigation purposes when expanding their air- port. He said that this has caused them to be locked into a disagreement with the State as to whether they will receive credit because they purchased the land before the paperwork was completed. He explained that he would not like to see this happen in Collier County. Mr. Gonzalez said that the Water Management District and Department of Environmental Protection has recently developed a miti- gation banking rule which allows developers and county organizations to buy land and withdraw on it as projects come on line. He said that Staff is not recommending that the BCC proceed on that path today. He explained that this l'equest is in regard to several projects being worked on that are in the final permitting negotiation stage but may be in construction up to five years from now. He said that if we can establish the mitigation area up front the agencies are willing to permit a better ratio at less cost. He said that Staff is trying to ,,oo, OOO,, 55 Page 25 September 6, 1994 separate the funds for mitigation from the funds for construction. He said the AUIR that was recommended for approval this morning includes those budget estimates for construction. He said that Staff is trying to tie up the land acquisition to show that it is tied to a project. Be explained that if the County does not move forward with the project the land will be used for something else. In response to County Manager Dotrill, Mr. Gonzalez confirmed that the Board does have the latitude to determine where the best site is to accomplish the compensation requirements for each capital project and possibly meet some of the resource conservation needs we may have. Mr. Gonzalez explained that the agencies are encouraging appli- cants to mitigate for impacts within the urban area such as CREW or the Belle Meads area. He said the primary reason for the two is the Belle Meade area is one of the largest environmentally sensitive lands that is undeveloped closest to the urban area in the County. He said that Staff will deal only with willing sellers. He said that they are trying to piece together what land will be needed over the long term. Mr. Gonzalez stated that if the County proceeds with mitigation as it is now it may result in excessive ratios, possibly 15 to 1. He said that the County may need up to 2,500 acres offsite to compensate for wetland impacts. He said that if the County pursues the large scale holding area concept in front of construction, the ratios can be cut and ultimately save the capital cost. He explained that if the county pursues a mitigation bank permit the County could receive one acre of credit for one acre of impact. He pointed out that there are only a few banks in the United States that are selling credits. Commissioner Constantine asked if the County could pursue the CREW land only? Mr. 6onzalez replied that the agencies are encouraging applicants in the northern parts of the County to go to the CREW lands. He said that In the urban area of the County the agencies are recommending the Belle Meade area. Page 26 September 6, 1994 Commissioner Constantine stated that the Board may be sending a mixed message to the State because we have asked the State to remove Belle Meads from the CARL list and now provide land as part of our mitigation. Mr. Gonzalez said that although it is not impossible to have 100~ of the program go to the CREW area, the agencies may exact more of a restoration program if we do that. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. 6onzalez stated that Resolution 91-385 notes five mitigation preserve areas that are possible options. He said one area is located two miles east of Immokalee Road and 1-75 adjacent to a PUD, another is north of Willoughby Acres in the Palm River slough area, one is where the Pelican Marsh is now developing, another is east of County Barn Road south of Davis Boulevard and the last is at the intersection of 951 and U.S. 41. He said for different reasons some of the areas are no longer viable because some are in the urban area which would be more expensive to purchase. He stated that the agencies do not want the County to have a large scale mitigation area within a publicly owned parcel because they do not see the benefit derived as much as if a natural resource was improved. In response to Commissioner Norris, Mr. 6onzalez confirmed that adjacent, on-site, similar wetland is the preferred method but on-site is t~pically developed and the values are more expensive. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Gonzalez stated that the County may have 170 acres of impacts along the roadway corridors. He said if we stay on-site in the ideal wetland situation we would have to put back 170 acres. Commissioner Volpe asked how large an area is being requested? Mr. 6onzalez stated that the agencies are discouraging piece meal approach to mitigation. He said if the County continues permitting projects as it is now the County may need as much as 2,500 acres of wet/and and wild/ire habitat. Commissioner Volpe asked if Staff has estimated what cost per acre Page 27 September 6, 1994 may be for the acquisition of 2,500 acres of land? Mr. Gonzalez replied that in the Belle Meads and CARL areas the cost would be much less than that in the urban areas. He said if the County pursues large scale mitigation the acreage may be cut by half. He explained that in terms of unit cost the 2,500 acres could cost between 215,000.00 or 225,000.00 per acre for land acquisition, plus 25,000.00 to 215,000.00 per year for the first five years for moni- toring and maintenance, plus the actual on-site restoration costs which could vary from 25,000.00 to 250,000.00 per acre. He said that the land costs in the Belle Meade or CREW area are between 21,000.00 to 25,000.00 per acre. He said that because these areas are not infested with exotics, the costs for restoration could be $500.00 to 21,000.00 per acre and the monitoring and maintenance may be between 25,000.00 to 210,000.00 per year. He explained that Exhibit 2 depicts the esti- mated costs for mitigation. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Gonzalez stated that the wetland bank developer on the east coast entered into an agreement with the City of Pembroke Pines to use the land, established the condition of the existing wetland system and assigned a value. He etated they established a program to monitor and assigned that an enhanced value. He said that the difference between the two amounted to the total credits available over a certain number of years. He said that once they obtained the permit for that a developer may request credits. Mr. Gonzalez reiterated that Staff recommends not pursuing a miti- gation bank at this time because the laws are still untested. Mr. Gonzalez stated that one of the conditions of the grant being applied for is that the land that is purchased can only be used for public purchase. County Manager Dotrill stated that in lieu of the 3,000 acres north of the landfill the best alternatives would be the CREW, Belle Meads or an extension of the Fakahatchee Strand. Mr. Gonzalez stated that the way the grant source is structured 58' Page 28 September 6, 1994 the land was acquired within the current funding cycle, which began on July 1, 1994. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Mr. Gonzalez replied that during the negotiation stage of the permitting phase is the time to identify some land to be used for a project, coincident to that, the lands adjacent to the project would have already been purchased for other projects and the County would obtain credit for them. Cosateetoner Constantine moved to recognize the projects as outlined in Exhibit 20 direct Staff to pursue mitigation holding area in the CREW area, direct Staff to prepare a grant application for use of Preservation 2000 funds and to authorize the Chairman to sign a cover letter authorizing a contact person from Office of Capital Projects. Commissioner Saunders stated that part of the logic of including the Belle Meads area may be because the CARL Program requires that the property is Identified for acquisition with funds set aside to proceed with the acquisition in a timely manner. He said that if the Belle Meads area stays on the CARL list, the County has identified a funding mechanism to help purchase the lands in an expeditious manner. He suggested keeping Belle Meads on the list of properties to be acquired. Commissioner Constantine reiterated that he is concerned about sending a mixed message to the State. He pointed out that there is no public representation from the Belle Meads area in attendance today. Commissioner Saunders suggested that a provision be included that if the property remains on the CARL list against the wishes of the Board of County Commissioners that the County would like to utilize the area as an acquisition mitigation banking area to assist the pro- perty owners. Commissioner Norris asked if any action taken today would preclude additional location siting in the future? Mr. Gonzalez answered in the negative. He said that we are currently pursuing acquisition with properties in the Belle Heads area Page 29 September 6, 1994 for projects specific. Cosslssloner Norris seconded the ~otlon. County Manager Dorrill stated that the intent is not to acquire any land. He said that the intent to apply for a permit that can be submitted to South Florida Water Management District, Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers will be in terms that need to be defined. He explained that when we have an indication after the permit is reviewed Staff will return and request appraisal reports in those areas. Commissioner Constantine concluded that the direction to Staff will have to answer the questions as to the amount of area and the cost. Upon call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. Item #8N4 WOK ORDER FOR THE EAST NAPLES CONNUNITY PARK UNDER THE ANNUAL AGREENENT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - APPROV~D Tom Conrecode, Office of Capital Project Management Director, stated that this item concerns a Work Order to do master site plan mitigation work for the final phase of the East Naples Community Park. He said that it has been endorsed by the East Naples Civic Association and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Commissioner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Constantine and carried unanimously, to approve the Work Order for the East Naples Cosmxntty Park. Page 30 September 6, 1994 (e66) Item leH6 BID 194-2255 FOR TH~ RECONSTRUCTION OF PUNP STATIONS 16A, 18C & 52A - &lIARDE TO DOUGLAS N. RIGGINS CONSTRUCTION CONPANY, INC. IN THE ANOUNT OF 2343,000.00 Cosmdssioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Norris and carried~nauimously, to award Bid #94-2255 to Douglas N. Higgins Construction Company, Inc. in the amount of $343,000.00 subject to Staff recommendations as listed In the Executive Summary. (903) Item lea1 BID 194-2260 FOR THE VANDERBILT BOOSTER STATION MODIFICATIONS - AWARDED TO STRICKLER BROS., INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF 843,212.00 Commissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Volpe and carried unanimously, to award Bid #94-2260 to Strickler Bros., Inc. the amount of 843,212.00 subject to Staff recommendations as listed the Executive Summary. (924) ltma#SH6 BID ~94-2254 FOR THE PINE RIDGE ROAD 16" WATER MAIN PHASE V - AWARDED TO MITCWa~_-n & STARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF 8759,T39.00 Comaissioner Saunders moved, seconded by Commissioner Natthews and carriedun~nimously, to award Bid #94-2254 to Mitchell & Stark Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of 8759,735.00 subject to Staff recommendations as listed in the Executive Summary. (999) Item lgB USE OF COUNTY DRUG ABUSE TRUST FUNDS TO ASSIST IN SUBSTANCE ABUSE TRUST FUNDS TO ASSIST IN SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION EDUCATION IN ALL COUNTY SCHOOLS - APPROVED Assistant County Attorney Manalich stated that through an over- sight by the Foundation for a Drug Free Generation this item requires that the Board approve a renewal to an Agreement for the distribution of funds and approve a payment of past due amounts from the Drug Abuse Trust Fund. Page September 6, 1994 Commissioner Volpe moved, seconded by Cosnatsstoner Natthews and carried unanimously, to approve the Agreement for the distribution of funds and prirsent of past due amounts from the Drug Abuse Trust Fund. Page 32 September 6, 1994 (1030) ltem#10A ZXTR~ G~IN TIN~ FOR IN!~tT~ NOS. 26989, 81968 and 44434 - NOT !~ARD Commissioner Constantine announced that this item will not be heard because the inmates have been released. (lo34) Item #lOB CITIZEI~HIP AWARD PROGRAN WHICH PROVIDES A VEHICLE WHEREBY PUBLIC RECOGNITION CAN BE GIVER TO INDIVIDUALS OR ORGANIZATIONS FOR EFFORTS WHICH PROVIDE COMNUNITY ENHANCEMENT - PRESENTED Commissioner Constantine stated that the Intent of this Item is to recognize an outstanding citizen group that has taken on an effort to do something on behalf of the community on a monthly basis. He explained that there will be a nomination process in which nominations will be reviewed by the Commissioner of each district. Be said that the Conuntssloner will choose which group will be recognized. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Commissioner Constantine replied that the DIstricts will rotate each month. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Constantine stated that the awards will be given to Individuals or organizations. Commissioner Volpe stated that this Is an excellent suggestion as it relates to organizations. He pointed out that the Board has recognized the County's Volunteer Program in the past. He expressed concern as to whether this will create a competitive atmosphere. Commissioner Saunders cautioned that there may be so many deserving Individuals and groups that It may be difficult to choose One · Commissioner Matthews asked how the Commissioners will be able to determine which group or individual Is better than another? Commissioner Constantine stated that there are certainly more than one group or individual deserving recognition at any one time. He said that the intent Is not Just to recognize an individual or group because they exist but to recognize a specific deed that they accomplished. ,oo. 000,, 68 Page 33 September 6, 1994 Commissioner Matthews expressed concern about the selection pro- cess, Commissioner Constantine stated that the selection process could be reviewed and modified before the program is implemented. He said that the only expense associated to the program would be the cost of the certificate. (1225) lte~#lOC APPOINTNENT TO THE VALVE ADJUSTNENT BOARD AND SET TENTATIVE DATES FOR THE ~ZNGS - SEPTENBER 26, 1994, SEPTENBER 28, 1994, SEPTENBER 29, 1994 & SEPTENBER 30, 1994 CHOSEN; CONNSRS. SAUNDERS, VOLPE & NATTHEWS TO SKRVE ON SEPTENBER 26, CONNSRS. SAUNDERS, VOLPE & NORRIS TO SERVE ON SEPTlimBER 28, COt~SRS. CONSTANTINE, NATTHEWS & NORRIS TO SERVE ON SEPTENBEIt 29 & 30 l~ NECESSARY Administrative Assistant to the Board Ftlson announced that September 26, 1994, September 28, 1994, September 29, 1994 and September 30, 1994 have been chosen as tentative dates for the Value Adjustment Board hearings. She stated that all of the dates may not be necessary but the actual number of days will not be known until September 13, 1994, which is the deadline for the filing of petitions. Commissioner Constantine announced that Commsrs. Volpe and Saunders will serve on September 26 and 28. He said that Co~untssioner Matthews will serve on September 26. He stated that Commissioner Norris will serve on September 28. He Indicated that he will serve on September 29 and 30 with Commsrs. Matthews and Norris If those dates are determined to be necessary. (1Sll) Zta#10D RESOLUTZON 94-656 APPOINTING NESSRS. CIRANNA AND TARANT0 AND REAPPOINTING NR. HODGIN TO THE ENVIRONNENTAL POLICY THCHNICAL ADVISORY Administrative Assistant to the Board Ftlson announced that there are three openings on the Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board. She stated that the recommendation from the Advisory Board Is 'tarry-appoint Derek A. Hodgin and not to appoint the other applicants. Commissioner Norris pointed out that in the past the Board has Page 34 September 6, 1994 received criticism for not following the recommendation of the advi- sory boards. Comiasioner Norris moved to re-appoint Derek A. Hodgin to the Environmental Poltc7 Technical Advisory Board, not appoint the other applicants and readvertise the vacancies. Seconded by Commissioner Matthemes. Commissioner Constantine stated that he cannot support the motion because the Board has consistently supported those applicants who volunteer and are qualified. Commissioner Volpe stated that he will also not support the motion. Commissioner Saunders announced that he too does not agree with the motion. He suggested that the motion be withdrawn. Comm/eeloner Matthews w~thdrew her second to the motion, there- fore, the motion died due to a lack of a second. Commm/mmioner Volpo moved to appoint Derek A. Hodgin and Gary L. BeardsIcy to the Environmental Policy Technical Advisory Board. Commissioner Constantine stated that he cannot support the motion if it includes Mr. BeardsIcy because he has filed a number of issues with the State which has resulted in an expense to the County. He pointed out that the advisory board itself does not recommend his reappotntment. Commissioner Volpo withdrew h~s motion. Commissioner Matthews referred to page 6 in the Executive Summary. She stated that this is a "technical" advisory board and the qualifi- cations listed on page 6 clearly note why certain applicants were not supported. Commissioner Constantine said that although they do not have a specific background in hydrology, solid waste or pollution control, Mr. Taranto is a Research & Development Specialist and has worked with major corporations. He said that he believes his background would qualify him as a candidate. CommimsionQr Norris moved to reappoint Derek a. Hodgin and appoint Pa~e S5 Sep~esbe: 6, ~994 MIchael V. Taranto and Thomas P. Cirarma to the ~nvironmental Policy Technical Advisor~ Board. Seconded by Comaissioner Sauuders. Upon call for the question, the aotion carried unanimously, thereby sdopting Resolution 94-656. Page 36 September 6, 1994 (1492) PUBLIC CGI!.ss~i - VICTOR VALDEZ RE POLICE BRUTALITY Victor Valdez stated that he was struck by a Collier County Sheriff's Deputy a few days ago. He presented the Board with a copy of a Naples Community Hospital Emergency Physician Record that resulted from the allegeO attack. Nr. Valdez claimed that three children, ages 5, 11 and 13 years old, were abused by Deputies from the Collier County Shertff's Office. He pointed out that the Board of County Commissioners provides the budget for the Sheriff's Office. He stated that the Board has the responsibility to see how the budget Is spent. Mr. Valdez stated that he can provide witnesses in the cases that he mentioned. (1606T ItemliSA1 PETITION A--94-2, ANTHONY PIRES APPEALING INTERPRETATION OF TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ELKNEFF (TCE) POLICY 7.2, COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) DITED &UGUST 29, 1994 - DENIED; STAFF DIRECTED TO DEVELOP POLICYRE THROUGH TRAFFIC Legal notice having been published In the Naples Dally News on July 31, 1994, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. County Attorney Cuyler stated that although this is a quasi- judicial process there will be no swearing In. He explained that Mr. Pires will present his appeal and Staff will respond. Attorney Anthony Ptres, Woodward, Plres, a Anderson, P.A., repre- senting the Citizens for a Safe Neighborhood, stated that this is a complex Issue. He presented the Board with a report regarding the Traffic Circulation Element (TCE). He reiterated that the Issue ts a complex one with a simple premise; the protection of the existing and future residential communities In Collier County from negative traffic Impacts. He said It Is a community wide Issue not solely focused on one neighborhood. He stated that tf the Board upholds Staff interpre- tation this concept as to the protection of residential communities Page 37 September 6, 1994 will not exist. He reported that the aligning major roads such as St. Andrews Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard would not qualify as a connection or Interconnection under Policy 7.2 of the TCE if the interpretation is upheld, therefore, the Growth Management Plan would offer no protection to affected property owners. He said that this interpretation would be discriminatory in its application on existing neighborhood public local streets for new communities which have adequate and expansive development restrictions imposed by the Growth Management Plan and Land Development Code. He stated that it is important to focus on three primary questions; questions 2, 4, and 5, that are listed on the first page of the Executive Summary. He indicated that Staff's response to question 2 is very narrow. He said that Staff's interpretation of "through traffic" in Policy 7.2, means traffic passing through the interconnected local streets of neigh- boring developments. He said that in materials provided by Hornberger which are included in his appeal, that through traffic is defined as traffic which is making traps with both trip ends outside the neigh- borhood. Commissioner Volpe asked Mr. Pires how he is defining "neighborhood"? Mr. PAres replied that neighborhood could mean community, develop- ment or area that has traffic that is not generated from within, that has neither an origin or end point. Attorney PAres referred to a sketch he presented that depicts two developments that are interconnected with the local streets, he said that when this occurs there would be an analysis to make a deter- mination whether or not the interconnection would result in adverse through traffic. Mr. PAres said that the next sketch outlines a situation where you have an intervening arterial roadway between development A and B and development B and C are connected. He stated that by the interpreta- tion A is not connected to B or C, the only Interconnection Is between B and C, although functionally traffic from the artery on the right Page 38 September 6, 1994 hand side through C, B and the artery in the middle and through A through the artery to the left or the reverse flow. Mr. Ptres stated that a good planning concept is to protect local residential streets from through traffic. Attorney Ptres emphasized that It Is Important that the Board con- sider the findings, positions, construction and statement of qualified, knowledgeable and expert Collier County Staff. He said that the testimony of Transportation Services Administrator Archibald is extremely Important and relevant in determining what Policy 7.2 means. He said that Mr. Archibald would not agree that the findings were con- sistent with the TCE if he believed that no Interconnection had or has occurred. He stated that Section 2 of his handout was an example of this. He pointed out that Section 3 of his handout quotes Mr. Archibald~s interpretation of County Policy. He said that Section 4 of the handout is page LU-I-26. He said that paragraph 2 refers to the density rating system. He stated that Section 5 referred to dif- ferent General Plan Interpretations. Mr. Ptres stated that the evidence relied upon to sustain the finding should be sufficiently relevant in material so that a reaso- nable mind would accept it as adequate support of the conclue/on reached. He said that in his review there is no basis for Startle Interpretation. He said there is no document, record, minutes or evi- dence. He Indicated that if the Interpretation is upheld Policy 7.2 will have been reduced to one rule for one function only as a mecha- nism to Increase density under the density rating system. Attorney Ptres requested that in addition to the issues outlined in the materials, that the Interpretation be re3ected, that the pur- pose and meaning of Policy 7.2 of the TCE is exactly what this com- munity, certain Staff and certain Board members believed; that is that a Interconnection between subdivisions and collector roads constitutes an Interconnection of local streets. He said that he is also requesting that the Board adopt an Interpretation that recognizes a broader meaning to what constitutes an Interconnection which wtll Page 39 September 6, 1994 assist the goal of protecting the integrity of residential com- munities. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Pires replied that his interpretation is broader than Staff interpretation. Commissioner Volpe asked what type of encouragement could local government provide to the interconnection if it does not have to do with density? Attorney Pires replied that the criteria for the density rating bonus is driving the TCE. Jeff Perry, Chief Planner of Long Range Planning, stated that the answers to the applicants concerns were answered in the Executive Summary. He said that the interpretation of the term "through traf- fic" by the applicant as well as Staff is consistent. He stated that he believes that the argument that Mr. Pires is presenting is that the arterial street system has been provided with an interconnection of local streets. He said that Staff's interpretation is very narrow as far as the purpose of the policy as it is written clearly describes the interconnection of local street between developments. He said that the purpose of the policy is to provide encouragement for local developments to interconnect their street systems. Commissioner Volpe commented that the impact could be an assessment of not going forward. He asked if there is the potential that this is a violation of the Growth Management Plan? Mr. Perry replied that if Mr. Pires interpretation is allowed to prevail that would be the case. County Attorney Cuyler concurred that it could be the case. Commissioner Saunders stated that practically every development at some point enters into a major arterial road. He said that by using Mr. Plree lnterpretatJor~, It means every time a development connects with an arterial road it has created an interconnect wlth other deve- lopments. He questioned the logic of interpreting the language of the Code covering that circumstance. Mr. PJres stated that the Growth Hanagement Plan was adopted in Page 40 September 6, 1994 1989. He asked Mr. Cuyler if his opinion would apply to "pre 1989" approvals? Mr. Cuyler replied that he would argue that. In response to Commissioner Saunders0 Hr. Plres stated that he would like to see the Board reverse or modify Staff's interpretation. Commissioner Saunders asked what the immediate impact would be on Pine Ridge as well as the rest of the County? County Attorney Cuyler replied that the County would be in viola- tion of the Growth Management Plan. Commissioner Constantine announced that he has been meeting with Pine Ridge residents. He stated that he bejieves that the problems w111 ease considerably once Vanderbtlt is complete but In the interim a few suggestions for short term solutions will be presented to the Board in the near future. Attorney Plres clarified that what he is requesting today is an interpretation that is more protective of existing residential com- munities. County Attorney Cuyler pointed out that Hr. Perry has not addressed Pine Ridge. He said that Hr. Perry indicated Staff's posi- tion. He requested that Hr. Perry disclose hls quaitficattons for the record. ~r. Perry stated that his current position Is Chief Planner in the Long Range Planning Department which is part of the Conununtty Development Division. He said that he has been employed by the County for 21 years, the first nine of which was in the Zoning Department. He stated that he was Zoning Director for the last two years of that period. He said that he has been Coordinator of the Netropolttan Planning Organization for the last eleven years. In response to Commissioner Constantine, Hr. Perry replied that most people would consider him to be an expert in his field. He reported that he holds a certification from the American Institute of Certified Planners. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Commissioner Constantine .o, O00,,. W Page 41 September 6, 1994 stated that the traffic calming suggestions will be brought before the Board some time in the next two weeks. Commissioner Matthews remarked that the Board had directed Staff to institute traffic calming techniques. She said that she is dismayed that a member of the Board must become personally involved in completing Staff direction which was given a year ago. County Attorney Cuyler advised that the motion will either be that there is competent, substantial evidence to support Staff~e interpre- tation or find that there is not competent, substantial evidence in order to overturn Staff'e interpretation. He said that if the Board finds that there is not competent, substantial evidence the Board may modify a portion of Staff~s interpretation. Comatesioner Norris moved, seconded by Commissioner Matthews, that there ~s competent, substantial evidence to support Staff interpretation, thereb~ denying this appeal. Commissioner Saunders asked if the motion is upholding Staff interpretation and recognizing that the definition of "through traf- fic" is agreed upon? Mr. Pires replied that he was not sure that he agreed because Staff interpretation of the context of Policy 7.2 is much nattower definition than the one he suggested. Mr. Perry stated that he would have to agree the term "through traffic" might apply in the context of how the phrase is used in this context. Commissioner Volpe asked if there were any provisions in the current policy of the Growth Management Plan that addresses the issue of through traffic in the context of commercial or residential neighborhoods? Mr. Perry replied that through traffic as described by Mr. Pires is not adequately addressed in the Growth Management P/an. Commissioner Norris agreed that this issue should be addressed. Commissioner Saunders stated that he will support the motion due to the procedural nature of this issue. He said that to overturn Page 42 September 6, 1994 Staff interpretation at this point would put the County in violation of its own Comprehensive Plan. He said that the County has created a situation in the Pine Ridge subdivision that is unacceptable. He said that we need to develop a policy that addresses the issue of cut through traffic in all neighborhoods. ~pan call for the question, the motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Norris stated that he did not agree that density bonuses should be granted in order to interconnect developments. He said that he would like to see that changed. Mr. Perry stated that when the plan was adopted in 1989 there was a density bonus of one dwelling unit per acre was granted for any development that connected with adjoining developments. He said that it was subsequently changed to a penalty when a developer lost one of the points that was guaranteed. Commissioner Norris moved that Staff be directed to develop a polic7 to address through traffic on the local residential and commer- cial interconnects. Seconded by Commissioner Volpe. Upon call for the question, the motion carried 5/0. (828) Itesa#14B YJLRDWI~rE PICK UP RE WASTE NANAG~NENT, INC. Commissioner Matthews stated that she has received a letter from Michael Kennedy of Waste Management, Inc., stating based on Board approval, his firm is ready to begin a pilot program the week of October 17, 1994 which will retnstttute trash pick-up on the yard waste pick-up days and Institute a weekly pick-up In areas which are currently yard waste pick-up. She asked that this Issue be addressed at the next BCC meeting. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Commissioner Matthews stated that to her knowledge this will have no Impact to the fee structure. (951) ltesa#14A LOBBYING KFFORT Commissioner Matthews announced that she met with Ray Judah from Lee County and Richard Leonard from Charlotte County. She reported 0C. v9 Page ,3 September 6, 1994 that the Lobbying initiative was discussed. She said that both the other Counties agree that this is an excellent idea and that their School Boards would be interested in participating and possibly providing partial funding for it. She said that Mr. Qutnby of the Collier County School Board, notified her that the Collier County School Board would also be interested. She reported that Mr. Leonard suggested that the program be initiated without the 60 day leglslative period but include the S0 day period prior to when the Committees meet because the County Commissioners could have more impact in the Committee meetings. She stated that the projected cost was approximately $3,000.00 per County for the 90 day period. Commissioner Volpe asked if the Florida Association of Counties (FAC) lobbied for issues that are important to local government? Commissioner Matthews said that they do lobby for issues that are important to individual Counties. She pointed out that the FAC con- sists of members of its Board of Directors and she is the only Board Member representing Southwest Florida. (1058) ltesae140 ARTICL~ V COSTS Commissioner Matthews stated that Mr. Judah and Mr. Leonard asked her to draft a letter to present to their Boards regarding the Article V costs that had been discussed in the past. She reported that she has forwarded a copy of the letter to Chairman Constantine for the Board's consideration. Page 44 September 6, 1994 Item ll4D PRO RATA ASSESSMENT Commissioner Matthews reported on an initiative that Mr. 3udah is working on which is Pro Rata Assessment for real estate property taxes. She said that he revealed that as much as 17 months may pass before a resident pays taxes after moving into the County. She said that Mr. Judah is interested in initiating a system where the Property Appraiser would make a Pro Rata assessment based on occupancy. She indicated that Mr. Judah is preparing a letter for the Board to con- eider forwarding to the FAC encouraging them to proceed with the issue. (1157) Item #14E COUNTY MANAGER AND COUNTY ATTORNEY REVIFdS Commissioner Constantine announced that both the County Manager and County Attorney reviews are due. He advised the Board to peruse their reviews and discuss their findings with Mr, Dotrill and Mr. Cuyler before they are presented to the Chairman. see Commissioner Matthews moved, seconded by Commissioner Norris and carried 4/0 (Commissioner Volpe out) that the following items under the consent agenda be approved and/or adopted. Item #16A1 RESOLUTION 94-609 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATENEFf OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE SERVICES CASE N0. 40315-009, RECORD OWNER: GILBERT AND MARTHA MENDES, AND ANTONE MENDES Item #16A2 RESOLUTION 94-610 AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN PORT OF THE ISLANDS (THE CAYS) FHASE II, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAIICrENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION See Page Item #16A3 FINAL PLAT OF "WILSHIRE LAKES, PEASE ~" - WITH THE STIPULATIONS AS LISTED IN THE EXECUTIVE SU~qARY ... 000- , 82 ,,age ~.. ,.... /~-/// Item#16A4 ACCEPTANCE OF WATER FACILITIES FOR EAGLE CREEK, September 6, 1994 Item #16A5 TRACT B-B, PHASE II - EXE~IVE SUMMARY ACCEPTANCE OF THE IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT FOR EXCAVATION PERMIT NO. 59.511, 'PELICAN MARSH UNIT 6, LAKE NO. 20' See / / 2 - / / 3 Item I16k6 BID 94-2224 AWARDED TO E.J. LEVAY COMPANY IN TEE AMOUNT OF 817,399 FOR A HI~HVOLUM~ COPY MACHINE FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMB~TE S~RVICES DMSION lte~#16A7 ACCEPTANCE OF SEWER FACILITIES FOR WILDWOOD LAKES - WITH THE STIPULaTIONE AS LISTED IN THE EXECUTIV~ SUMMARY RKCOEDED I! OR BOOK 1993 PACES |67S -|69S Item #16&8 RESOLUTION 94-611 AUTHORIZING PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF TH~ ROADWAY, DRAINAM, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE ESTATES AT WY~DEMERE AND ACCEPTING TH~ IRKE"~3CABLE LETTER OF CREDIT FROM THE DEVELOPER FOR MAIITE~NANCE OF THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROv~-aea~xS FOR A MININ~M OF ORE YEAR Item#16A9a RESOLUTION 94-612 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 20203-035, RECORD OWNER: BERTRAM E. FITZGERALD, ET UX See Pages Item #16Agb RESOLUTION 94-613 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATBME~T OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 20714-051, RECORD OWNER= A. AND LYDIA CAMPANINI Ites#16&gc RESOLUTION 94614 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABAT~ENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 20714-061, RECORD OWNER: A. AND LYDXA CAMPANINI' See Pages Page 46 September 6, 1994 Itea #1619d RESOLUTION 94-615 FROVIDING FOR ASSESSNENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ~BATENKNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, CONPLIANCE CASE NO. 20715-060, RECORD OWNE~: NA(ID~LINA BLANCO See Pages Itms #16lkge RESOLUTION 94-616 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSNEff OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE &BITSGIrt OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COWlPLIANCE CASE NO. 20724-054, RECORD OWNER: ~VLIUS N. ~ROD~ See Pages I e- 2' Ites#16Agf RESOLUTION 94-617 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSNENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATENENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, CONPLIANCE CASE NO. 30716-110, RECORD OWNER: FLORENCE O. CONNOR AND GORDON SHERWOOD Item #16A9g RESOLUTION 94-618 PROVIDING FOR ASSESS~IENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE /LK~TI~KNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COWIPLIANCE CASE N0. 30729-012, RECORD O~INER: EDWILRD D. FALLIN, JR., ET AL See Pages / It~ #16Agh RESOLUTION 94-619 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSNENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE IBITINKIT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE° CONFLIANCE CASE NO. 31213-060, RECORD OliNEll: iERlll AID JAN See Pages Item tl2A91 RESOLUTION 94-620 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSWrENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATDe~FT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, CONPLIANCE CASE NO. 40202-046, RECORD OWNE~: LYNN D. NANN AND ROBERT S. BARBER Item #16A9J RESOLUTION 94-621 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSNENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATENENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, CONPLIANCE CASE NO. 40309-010, RECORD (NNER: DIETRICH PLEFKA See Pages ltem lle~gk R~SOLUTION 94-622 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSNENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABSTINENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, CONFLIANCE CASE NO. 40309-037, RECORD Pa~w 47 September 6, 1994 OWNER: aMY E. CASH Item #16A91 RESOLUTION 94-623 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEHENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40315-016, RECORD OWNER: TIM G. LIEVING See Pages I.¢a -//~/ Item #16A9m RESOLUTION 94-624 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40321-050, RECORD OWNER: ENCARNACION AND NANCY O. GARZA See Pages Item #16A9n RESOLUTION 94-625 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40321-051, RECORD OWNER: O.L. SNYDER, ET UX See Pages /,../~-/.¢~ Item #16A9o RESOLUTION 94-626 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40328-127, RECORD OWNER: IRENE PARENT AND SUZANNE GRAHAM ,ee Pages Item 116A9p RESOLUTION 94-627 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40404-053, RECORD OWNER: GEORGE KANELOPOULOS Item #16A9q RESOLUTION 94-628 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40405-068, RECORD OWNER: WILLIE MAE POSTELL ~ee Pa~es 15 a - 15, ~ Item #16Agr RESOLUTION 94-629 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMXlTE OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40407-026, RECORD OWNER: MIMON BANON See Pages / ';' ~/- I <'~' ~oo,, OOO,',~, 85 Page 48 September 6, 1994 Item el6Ags RESOLUTION 94-630 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSI(Krr OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE I~KI1NEIT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, CO!~P~IANC~ CASE NO. 40407-052, RECORD OMN[~: a.~ERT AID 14Mt, GXI~'T LEE Item tlGAgt RESOLUTION 94-631 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSNENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABAT~eEIT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, CONPLIANCE CASR NO. 40408-041, RECORD OWNER: NINON BARON See Pages Item #16Ah RESOLUTION 94-632 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATENEff OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE N0. 40411-077, RECORD Of~RXR: 14&URICE R. AND KAREN C. SKIFFKY See Pages //~4~-/~/ Item #16Agv RESOLUTION 94-633 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABAT~SeBST OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40411-116o RECORD OWNER: WILLIAM C. AND IRENE K. SCRERER See Pages RESOLUTION 94-634 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TH~ COST OF THE ABATBNKNT OF P~SLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CUE NO. 40421-046, RECORD See Pages Item 11&l~gx RESOLUTION 94-635 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR TI~ COST 0F THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CUE NO. 40429-083, RECORD OWNER: EDMARD AND LAVERDA PELC Item #16Agy RESOLUTION 94-636 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATENEFf OF PUBLIC NUISANCE° COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40510-048, RECORD OWNER*. HERB AND DENISE BRUNO ltem lll&gz RESOMFEION 94-637 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATBMKNT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, C.OMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40523-051, RECORD Page 49 SeptembeF 6, leg4 WILLIAM FOTRX, JR. AND SUZANNE M. FOTRE Item #16Agaa RESOLUTION 94-638 PROVIDIIQ~3 FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMEIFT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40519-030, R~CORD OWNER: RICHARD LOVE Item llllgbb RXSOLUTION 94-639 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUE~IC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE N0. 40519-010, RECORD OWNER: MtNULFO ]UFD E~DA TRKVINO See Pages Item e16Aecc / 9,¢- / RESOLUTION 94-640 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE leO. 40512-042, RECORD O~INZR: ~ 30N:NSON Item #16Agdd RESOLUTION 9&-641 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMKITE OF PUBLIC NUISANCI~, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40411-045, RECORD (rdlrER: LESTER H. AND CONSTANCE M. GHENT '/ ,f" Item #16igee RESOLUTION 94-642 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMEET OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE NO. 40407-022, RECORD See Pages ,. Item#16Agff RESOLUTION 94-643 PROVIDING FOR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABA=IM~3FT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASE leO. 40317-012, RECORD OWNER= JOSEPH AND ROSE CLEMX~FEE Pa.e. lf' - I "S Item #16A9~ RESOLUTION 94-644 PROVIDING ~OR ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, COMPLIANCE CASK NO. 20715-057, RECORD OWNER: RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION INV. FEDERAL SAVINGS BARK September 6, 1994 It~ellilO ACCEPT~SC2 OF T~X IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT AS SECURITY FOR EXCAVATION PERNIT NO. 59.513 "VILLAGE WALKe Item l16&ll RESOLUTION 9&-6&5 AUTHORIZING 100 PERCENT WAIVER OF LIBRARY SYSTEN I!~PACT FK~, PJG~XS AND RECREATION FACILITIES I!~PACT FEES, ROAD I!~PACT FEES, E!~RGENCY !~EDICAL SERVICES II~PACT FEES AND EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES SYSTEN It4PACT FEES FOR ONE HOUSE TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY ERNEST N. FREEit&N, 3R. ON LOT 4, BLOCK 4, PALI~TYO PARK, IW~4OKALEE, FLORID~, SAID INPACT FEES TO BE PAID FRON AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND 191 Itea #16A12 RESOLUTION 94-646 AUTHORIZING 100 PERCENT WAIVER OF LIBRARY SYSTEN II~PACT FEES, PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES I~PACT FEES, ROAD INPACT FEES, ENERGENCY NEDICAL SERVICES INPACT FEES AND EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES SYSTEN I!~PACT FEES FOR A THREE BEDR00N HOUSE TO BE BUILT BY 30AN QUINN, IN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, SAID INPACT FEES TO BE PAID FRON AFFO~M~BLE HOUSING TRUST FUND 191 ltem el6&13 RESOLUTION g4-647 AUTHORIZING PRELININARY ACCEPTANCE OF TH~ ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, ~TKR/tled S~ I~RO~S IN ~ ORC~DS [~SE 0~) ~ AC~~ ~ ~~CE A~ ~I~CE BO~S (POSTED ~ ~ CL~) ~ ~ D~LOP~ FOR ~I~CE OF ~ RO~AY, D~INAGE, NA~~ $~ I~0~S ~R A~NI~ 0F O~ ~ Item el6A14 ACCEPTANCE OF WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES FOR THE ORCHARDS, Item#16&15 PHASE ONE - RECORDING OF THE FINAL PLAT OF "PELICAN I~LRSH UNIT THREE, PHASE TWO" - WITH TI~ STIPULATIONS ~S LISTED IN THE EXECUTIVE SU!eO. RY Item#lG&16 RESOLUTION 94-64S &UTHORIZING 100 PERCENT WAIVER OF REGIONAL WATER SYST~N INP&CT FEES, REGIONAl, SEWER SYST~N INPACT FEES, LIBRAI~Y SYST~N I~ ~, P~ ~ ~TION~ FACILITIES I~A~ ~E$, RO~ E~CATION~ F~ClLITIIS ~S~N I~A~ ~ES ~R O~ HOUSE ~ BE CON~~ ~ BB3~IN A~ SILVIA G. TO~IS, ON LOT 10, BLO~ N~ ~ ~ION, NAPLES, S~ID I~A~ ~ES TO BE PAID Page September 6, 1994 AFFORDABLE SOUSING TRUST Iq3ND 191 IteallTB1 - Deleted Item IIlB2 AGRBa,~xSWITH OWNERS OF LOTS 12 AND 13, BLOCK 277, MARCO BEACH UNIT e, FOR PARTICIPATION IN SEAWALL REPAIRS IN THE ANOUNT OF 25,740 WITH CO~CuK~a3FT INSTALLATION OF 125 FRET OF REPLACEMENT OF SIDE YARD DRAINAGE PIFE IN THE AMOUNT OF 84,500 Ite~tlTB$ RECKE&TIONAL VEHICLE PARK ROAD IMPACT FEE PAYMENT RATE ON A DWELLING UNIT BaSIl OF $845 PER DWE.~LING UNIT AS AN ALTEKNATE TO THE PAYMENT RATE ON A FER ACRE BASIS I~3R RECREATIONAL VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Itea t16B4 PATMEET OF SuKv~x AND FENCI~ REPLACEMENT COSTS FOR THE IIeeOKALEE ROAD PROJXCT ASSOCIATED WITR THI~ ACQUISITION OF RIGHTS-0F-WAYAND CONSTRUCTION OF lllTH AVEN~IE (EXTENSION OF THE IMNOKALEE ROAD FOUR LANING FROJ~CT FROM U.S. 41 TO 8TR STREET) TO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPAN~ IN THE ANOUNT OF $2,394 Itea #16C1 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNE,ING FOR ROUTINE AND EMERGENCY IRRIGATION REPAIRS RELATIVE TO ALL FACILITIES WITHIN THE COLLIER COUNTY PARK SYSTEM lET BE ANOUNT OF 62,000 ltea#16C2 BUDGET ~a~a~sx AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF 84,500 FROM THE SOCIAL SEITVXCE~ DEP~, $2,000 FROM THE VETERANS TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM TO THE Vt'I/RAN$ SERVICES DEPARTMEET AND 81,000 FROM THE VETERANS SERVICES D~Pa~TMKNT FROM 01~v-RATING EXPB~SES TO CAPITAL OUTLAY FOR THE PURCNaSI OF ANEWCOMPUTER SYSTEM Ites ll6Dl BID e94--2220 FOR PVC PIPE A~ PIPE FITTINGS AWARDED TO Dais INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY AS THE PRIMARY VENDOR; DAVIS METER & SUPPLY, FERGUSON UNDEReROUND, HUGHES SUPPLY IND SOUTHEASTERN MUNICIPAL AS SECONDARY VEND01tS ON AN ITEM-BY-ITEM t'aSIS IN ORDER OF PRICE AND AVAILABILITY Item#lTD2 BID~e&-2256 AWARDED TO WILKENS, MALCOLN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. OF PLANTATION, FLORIDA, IN THE ESTINATHD ANOUNT OF 8150,000 IN ET 94-95, FOR TELEMETEY REPAIRS AND SERVICE Item#lID3 CONSKNT TO USE EASEMENT AGREI~MENT - PIPERsS GROVE September 6, 1994 See Pages Item/16D4 NAIVEI~ OF THE CONPETITIVE BID PROCESS AND AUTHORIZATION TO ACQUIRE PARTS FO!tTHE COu~x~ BELT PRESS FRON SOLE SOURCE ASHBROOK CORPORATION IN THIAleOUIT OF 218,154,80 Ite~il6El RESOLUTION 94-649 CANCELING CURRENT TAXES UPON LAND ACQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE FOR A PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 340, !(~RCO BEACH UNIT 10, PLAT BOOK 6, PAGES 74 THROUGH 79, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA KNOWN AS THE POINT FL4RCO COUNTY PARKING FACILITY CONTAINING 1.05 ACRES MORE OR LESS AND TWEIITY FOOT (20') BEACH ACCESS AREA CONTAINING 0,25 ACRES See Pages Item #16E2 RESOLUTION 94-650 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING TRE LEASING OF FIFTY-SIX PERCENT (56~) OF THE GOLDEN .GATE PUBLIC SAFETY COI4PLER, LOCATED AT TEE CORNER OF CORONADO PARKWAY AND GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, TO TEE GOLDEN GATE FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT,"'RN INDEPENDENT SPECIAL DISTRICT OF TEE COUNTY OF COLLIER, STATE OF FLORIDA, FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES TO COLLIER COUNTY Item #16~1 ~ Deleted ltem#161P2 FIELD 1_,~1P AGREENENT SrrWEEN COLLIER COUNTY DEPJ~*~ E~KRGE!ICY NEDICAL ~VICES ~ EDISON C~I~ COLLEGE See Pages Ite~#1613 RE3~CTION OF BID 194-2163 FOR EN~RGENCYNEDICAL SERVICES FURNITURE Item #16G1 RESOLUTION 94-651 ADOPTING POLICIES REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY FOR !~AINTENANCE'OF SECONDARY DItRINAGE SYSTENS IN COLLIER COUNTY Item #16G2 See Pages CERTIfiCATES OF CORRECTION TO THE 1992, 1993 AND 1994 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SP~CIALASSESSW[ENT ROLLS, AOTHORIZING TH~ CEklR)ikN TO SIGN THE CERTIfiCATES ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY CONNZSSION~RS, AND AOTNOItlZZIG REFUNDS AS APPROPRIATE See Pages Item Jl6Hl .o, 000,, , 90 Page 53 September 6, 1994 WORE ORDER NO. WA-IS WITH WILKISON AND ASSOCIATES, INC., UNDER THE CURRENT ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREENE~TT FOR LAND SURVEYING SERVICES AT THE PROPOSED ORANGE TREE AREA REGIONAL PARK IN THE NOT-TO- EXCEED AMOUNT OF $8,000 Item el6H2 BUDGET &'~mxS RECOGNIZING RF.~PPROFRIATION OF FUNDS FOR lleeOKALEE RO&D ANDRJkDIO ROADRIGHT-OF-WAY Itetel6Ss - Delmted Item el~R4 BUD(3HT Jk~zm.~x FOR ENGINEERING AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR MASTKR P~3MP STATION 1.01 IN NORTH NAPLES IN THE AMOUNT OF 225,000 Item #16H5 WORE DIRECTIVE 82 (FINAL) TO THE NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH GREAT MOMu,-~z CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF 811,455.10, INCREASING FUNDING TO 815,545,286.92 Item #16H6 - Deleted Itn#161r/ AWARD OF CONTINUING SERVICE AGREEMENTS FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES WITH WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC., AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAOE, INC., 30HNSON ENGINEERING, INC. AND WILKISON & ASSOCIATES, INC. & Hole, Montes, (RFP 94-2191)~ AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES WITH ARCHITECTURAL NETWORK, INC., BARANY SCHNITT k~EAVKR AND PARTNERS, INC., ALFRED FRENCH AND ASSOCI&TIS, INC. AND VICTOR 3. LATAVISH ARCHITECT P.A. (RFP 94-2192) It~ ~ttil - Deleted Ztem J16H9 - Deleted lteaSl2110 CHANGE ORDER NO. FIVE TO MASTER PUMP STATIONS 3.16 AND 3.18 PRO3ECT WITH CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, FOR R~VISION TO STAIR TREADS TO PUMP STATION, INSTALLATION OF AIR RELEASE VALVES AND INSTALLATION OF TWO FIRE HYDRANTS TO SERVE EACH PUMP STATION IN THE AMOUNT OF 824,606, INCREASING THE CONTRACT A)~URT TO ~1,695,025.95 See Pages Item #16Hll FJkSKNENT JM31~MENT FOR THE DEV~LO~ OF VINEYARDS COIe*WNI TY PARK ,-, 000,, , 91 See Pages Page 54 September 6, 1994 Ite~ elfi12 CO!~KItITION MeOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995 AS CONTAllIED IN THE AGREEMENT MIT!!GJLRY L. NOYZI~, P.A. TO PROVIDE FOR CURRENT CONTRACT I~I~IAGER SERVICES FOR T~E PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION IN THE ANOUNT OF $53,ooo Item #16H13 WORK ORDER HNA-14 UNDER TRZ CURRENT ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGRKENZNT FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN, PERNITTING AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADNINISTRATION FOR PUNP STATION ELECTRICAL UPGRADES WITH HOLE, NONTES AND ASSOCIATES IN THE ANOUNT OF $15,700 Item#16H14 ~ OF TWO (2) ANNUAL PROFESSIONAL AGREEXENTS FOR MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES PER CONTRkCT 92-1888 WITH ARDANAN AND ASSOCIATES AND LAW ERGXIFEZ~II~ Item elSa12 PEOFESSIOItIL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH COASTAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC. TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING SERVICES NECESSARY IN PERFO1~ANCE OF ANNUAL NONITORXNG REQUIRENEITTS FOR THE MARCO ISLAND BEACH RENOURISHN~NT PROJECT IN THE ANOUNT OF ~88,795 Item #16H16 - Deleted Item #16H17 REVISED BE&OH RENOURISH~I~NT AND PASS MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR TOURIST DEV~LOP~ZNT TAX (;RANT APPLICATIONS Item#16Hl8 ACCEPTANCE OF EASENE~TS ERON WILLIAN SCIiWKIKHARDT, TRUSTEE, ~ ST. VIN~ DEPA~ $~I~ NAPLES DIS~ICT CO~CIL, INC., A~ORIZING ~ C~I~ ~ ~~ ~CHASE l~~S ~R ~X ~S~S, ASSI~ 0F ~ ~~ ~ ~E FLORIDA DEP~~ OF ~S~TION ~ A~ZIN ~ ~I~ TO ~C~K ~ ASSIG~ OF ~~S ltem4Pl6Nlg WORK OiIDZRCEC-2S FOR COAI;TAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC., FOR THE BOUNDAITY 131D TOPOG~k~HIC I;UKVEY AT THE INNOKALEE STOCKADE IN ANOUlrrOF $Z6,000 Page 55 September 6, 1994 Pages 77 "' Item#16H20 AGRzL~a~xS WITH WALTER P. NOORE AND ASSOCIATES, INC., APPLIED TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENt, INC., AND AN INCREASE TO TH~ CURRENT PURCHASE ORDER kITE PISTORINO AND ALAM CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., FOR EXPERT kITNESS TESTIMONY ON THE SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT LITIGATION AGAINST CONSOER, TOWNSEND a ASSOCIATES, INC. See Pages Documents not received in Clerk to Board Office as of |/3/95 Item CHANGE ORDER leO. · TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTWITH STEVENS AND LAYTON, INC. FOR THE EAST GOLDEN GATE WELLFIELD EXPANSION CONTRACT 2 PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING T~E PROJECT MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CHANGE ORDER IN THE aMOUNT OF $11,022, INCREASING THE CONTRACT AMOUNT TO 82,414,411 See Pages Item #16H22 - Deleted - _6'9/ ltem#16H23 M~a~axS TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICE AGREEMENTS WITH OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS FOR THB NORTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT: MOT ASSOCIATES IN THE AMOUNT OF $57,000; CARLTON, FIELDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $75,000; AND BOYLE ENGINEERING IN THE AMOUNT OF 8532,375 Item llS!!24 -- Deleted Item'gl~5 - Deleted Item 0 AND CONSTRUCTION S~RVICES FOR THE C(mPLETION OF MaSTER PUMP I;TATION 1.04 IN THE AMOUNT OF 87~500 ltem e16H27 RESOLUTION 9·-652 AUTHORIZING THE BOREOWING OF 8650,000 EROW THE POOLED CO!e~F, RCIAL PAPER LOaN PROGRAM OF THE FLORIDA LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE COte~ISSION PURSUANT TO THE TERMS OF THE LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COIeelSSION AND THE COUNTY IN ORDER TO FINANCE A PORTION OF THE COSTS AND EXPENSES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH LIBRARY; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LOAN NOTE OR NOTES TO EVIDENCE SUCH BORROWING; AGREEING TO SECURE SUCH LOAN NOTE WITH A COVENANT TO BUDGET AND APPROPRIATE LEGALLY AVAILABLE NON-AD VALOREM RzVzsuzS AS PROVIDED IN THE LOAN AGREEMENT; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF SUCH OTHER :DOCUMENTS AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO EFFECT SUCH BORRO%IING September 6, 1994 Item#16H28 kGEND& ITEMS AFFROVED BY THE COUNTY KMeAGER DURING THE BO/tRD~S RECESS: BUIXSET &'u~.~xS 94-521, 94-595, 94-599, 94-604 AND 94-606; BUDGET M~b, RESOLUTIONS 94-27 AND 94-28 Item 1163 NISCELLANEOU~ CORRESPONDENCE - FILED AND/OR HEIFERRED The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and/or referred as presented by the Board of County Commissioners: Page September 6, 1994 Ite~ 816~1 CERTIFIC&TF~ OF CORRECTIOI! TO THE TAX ROLLS AS PRESENTED BY TBE PROP!3tT~ I~FR~ISXR 167 Item el6J2 198 1992 TINGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY Date 08/23/94 1993 TIIGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 08/23/94 ~993 REAL PROPERTY 08/09/94 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER Itea 116K1 BUDGET ~a~x IN THE ANOUN~ OF $102,000 FOR THE PARTIAL REDKMFTION OF THE 1982 SERIES GOODLAND WATER ASSESSMENT BONDS Item ela_~ EXXCUT~ IIkTISF&CTION OF LIER DOCUMENTS Item ll6F,~ BUDGET TR&NSFER OF 235,000 WITHIN THE 301 C/LPITAL FUND FOR SPACE GAVIN9 FURNITURE FOR NORTH NAPLES, EAST N/LPLES AND INNOIAL~E SHERIFF SUBSTATIONS USE OF OONFISC&T~D TRUST FUNI~3 IN THE ANOUNT OF $2,200 TO SUPPORT A CRIM~ PfuswemxlON PROGRAN Item#16K2 BUDGET N~I~£ IN TEE ANOUNT OF 271,000 TRANSFERRING F~3NDS FItON RESERV~STOREDENPTION OF LONG TERN DEBT TO COVERTHE APPROPRIATION SNORTF/tLL IN FUND 253 RESOLUTION 94-652 APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR ACCOUNT NO. 10951 THJtT M&2 IlLLED IN ERROR FOR ~rE 1991 SOLID WAST~ COLLECTION AND DXSPOII~ SIRVICXS SFECIAL ASSESSMENTS AND !t~SOL~ZFTION 94-654 APPROVXNG SATIg&CTIOI OF LIEN FOR ACCOUNT NO. 11154 TB~T WAS BILLED IN ERROR September 6, 1994 FOR ~ 1991 SOLID WAST~ COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL Item #16L2 RESOLUTION 94-655 APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CENTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT gaVE PAID IN FULL THE 1991 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SFECIAL ASSESSMENTS See Pages Item llSLS CONVETMICBBY STATUTORY DEED OF LOT 18, BLUE HERON LAKE PARK, AN ~FLaT, TO THEFOI~eEROil!IZRS, SERAFIN R. SOSAMID nn~-.umuO SOS&, ,31t~ See Pages There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - TIme: 4:00 P.M. ATTESTs. '. '~. DWIGHT'E. B~OC~, ~LERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL ISTRICTS UNDER ITSF CON J N CO A T , Page 59