EAC Agenda 04/04/2012EAC
MEETING
AGENDA
APRIL 4s) 2012
AGENDA
COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL
WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY, APRIL 4, 2012, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS ROOM, TIL E COUNTY
GOVERNMENT C ENTER 3 99TAMIAMADMINISTRATION
RAI AST, NAPLES, FLORIDA ORIDA
I. Call to Order
Roll Call
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Approval of March 7, 2012 meeting minutes
V. Upcoming Environmental Advisory Council Absences
VI. Land Use Petitions
None
VII. New Business
None
VIII. Old Business
A. Surface Water Management Business Plan Update — Jerry Kurtz
B. LDC Amendments — Review by EAC
C. Update members on projects
IX. Council Member Comments
X. Staff Comments
XI. Public Comments
XII. Adjournment
Council Members: Please notify Summer Ara ue Senior Environmental S ecialist no later than
5:00 .m. on March 30 2012 if ou cannot attend this meetin or if ou have a conflict and will
abstain from voting on a petition 252-6290L
General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the
proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is
made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
To: Environmental Advisory Council
From: Jerry Kurtz, Principal Project Manager
Date: March 21, 2012
Subject: Surface Water Management Business Plan
Project Prioritization
As you know the Stormwater and Environmental Planning Section is preparing a Surface Water
Management Business Plan (SWMBP) to address the future Surface Water Management needs of
Collier County. During the previous Council meeting held on March 7th you were provided a copy of
the Project Management Plan (PMP) to develop the business plan and a categorized list of many
potential surface water management projects. The next step of business plan development is project
prioritization and future needs programming based on plan goals and objectives.
As developed, information is being provided to you to facilitate a collaborative effort to direct limited
resources toward highest priorities which could offer the greatest possible benefit provided by
taxpayer dollars. Discussion of the issues during publically advertised council and committee
meetings is critical to development of the SWMBP. Soliciting and gaining citizen and agency input
through the duration of the planning process will insure that the program strategy is clear and the
approach developed is comprehensive, cohesive and consistent year -to -year. The same information
provided to you is also being provided to the Floodplain Management Planning Committee (FMPC),
which meets on the first Monday of every month, to gain additional citizen and agency input.
Based on some of the goals stated in the SWM Business Plan PMP, recognizing the need to focus on
several core initiatives, projects which include these elements should be programmed as priority
efforts:
1. Improve management of County Maintained Surface Water Infrastructure
a. Update the system inventory
b. Complete a lifecycle evaluation for each water control structure
c. Schedule all necessary infrastructure repair and /or replacement
2. Redirection /reduction of excess surface water flow to Naples Bay
3. Improvement of surface water quality prior to discharge into receiving waters
4. Collaborative or joint effort public infrastructure improvement projects
Land Development Serrices - 2800 North Horseshoe Drive - Naples, Florida 34104.239 -252 -2400 • vim.colliergov.net
The following projects are recommended as high priority initiatives. With your review, comments
and endorsement County staff will proceed with BCC review and approval of initiation of these
efforts if possible, as funding is available, during the remainder of FY 12. Subsequent SWMBP
information to be provided will include proposed FY 13 recommended efforts with the proposed
FY 13 draft Stormwater budget, as well as initiatives and projected budgets for the 5 -year cycle -
FY 13 through FY 17.
1. 28th Avenue Southeast Culvert Crossing over Miller Canal
Replacement of an existing culvert crossing at the west end of 28th Avenue Southeast off of Everglades Blvd. S.,
south of Golden Gate Parkway; This project is an upgrade of a crossing over the Miller Canal which is currently
restricting flow in the canal during storm events. Currently the flow of water to the south is limited. This adds to
the flow going west into Naples Bay, and causes some canals in Northern Golden Gate Estates back up
contributing to street and yard flooding under saturated conditions during storm events.
2. Pine Ridge Outfall Canal No.1 Water Control Structure
This water control structure is located on the Pine Ridge Subdivision Canal just south of Immokalee Road, west of
Goodlette Frank Road. The structure prevents salt water migration south from the Cocohatchee River, regulates
the upstream surface water level and controls the flow and discharge north into the Cocohatchee River. The
structure is currently in poor structural condition.
3. Golden Gate City Outfall Replacement
5 to 10 year planned project currently underway, annually replace varying amounts (as funding is available) of
approximately 125 pipe runs throughout 4 square mile area of Golden Gate City; Included on this list as
recommend for supplemental funding.
4. Vanderbilt Drive Swale Rehabilitation
This existing roadside swale is located along the east side of Vanderbilt Drive between Vanderbilt Beach Road
and 111th Ave N. (west side of Naples Park). Stormwater runoff flows from Vanderbilt Drive and Naples Park into
the swale then discharging west under Vanderbilt Drive at approximately seven locations into the Vanderbilt
Lagoon. The swale condition currently varies widely from too shallow, too deep, no swale, and several different
sizes of culvert pipes in varying conditions from good to completely collapsed. The existing antiquated potable
water main is buried along this same side of the roadway and is scheduled for replacement in 2013. A joint
Utility and Stormwater project is warranted to insure a proper approach to the work. Also, a new swale design
could increase surface water quality treatment to the area improving the quality of the runoff prior to discharge
into Vanderbilt Lagoon.
5. Existing County -Wide Water Control Structure Lifecycle Evaluation
with completion of the inventory of county maintained surface water control structures a lifecycle assessment is
necessary to develop a long -range plan for maintenance, rehabilitation, and eventual replacement.
Page 2 of 4
6. Eagle Creek Water Level Control Structure
This county maintained surface water control structure located on the north side of Tower Road west of Collier
Blvd. and east of Barefoot Williams Rd. prevents salt water migration north into the southern limit of Eagle Creek
from Henderson Creek (Rookery Bay), regulates the upstream surface water level of the Eagle Creek subdivision
and controls the flow and discharge south into Rookery Bay. The structure is currently in poor structural
condition.
7. Gordon River Extension Burning Tree Drive Diversion
This is a new conceptual project considered to divert stormwater runoff which currently flows from the ditch on
the west side of Goodlette Frank Road, south of Pine Ridge Road, into a pipe along the north side of Burning Tree
Drive, flowing east into the Gordon River Extension. The proposed diversion is to send more water south along
Goodlette Frank Road and then into the surface water quality treatment areas located in the new Freedom Park
at the north east corner of Goodlette Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway. Preliminary WQ data and analysis
from ongoing sampling at the park indicates that additional treatment capacity may be available.
Summary Table
Project
Project Name
Amount
Purpose
Comments
No.
Flow Diversion, Golden Gate Main
28th Avenue Southeast Culvert Crossing over Miller Canal
$ 150,000
DR
Canal, Naples Bay
TBD
Pine Ridge Outfall Canal No.1 Water Control Structure
$ 680,000
DC
Existing Infrastructure Replacement
TBD
Vanderbilt Drive Swale Rehabilitation
$ 50,000
D
w Q Imp., Cord. w/ Utilities
TBD
Existing County -Wide Water Control Str. Lifecycle Eval.
$ 50,000
P
Existing Infrastructure Maintenance
TBD
$ 30,000
D
Existing Infrastructure Replacement
51029
Golden Gate City Culvert Replacements
$ 80,000
:::D
Existing Infrastructure Replacement
TBD
Eagle Creek Water Level Control Structure
TBD
Gordon River Extension Burning Tree Drive Diversion
$ 60,000
PD
WQ Imp., Gorgon River, Naples Bay
Total
$1,100,000
P = Planning, D = Design & Permitting, R = Right -of -Way Acquisition, C = Construction
Page 3 of 4
Protect Location Map - the numbers in red correspond to the projects listed on the previous page.
Page 4 of 4
LDC Amendment 2012 Cycle 1: Amendments for EAC Review and Recommendations
Wednesday, April 4, 2012 - EAC Meeting
All LDC Amendments can be found on the Collier County LDC Amendment Website
LDC Amendment
Author
1.08.02 Definitions open space, 4.02.01 Dimensional Standards
Growth Management Division
_usable
for Principle Uses in Base Zoning Districts, and 4.07.02 Design
Staff
Standards for PUD usable open space
4.02.14 D and 9.04002 B 1- ACSC -ST (031912 - SL)
Stephen Lenberger, Sr.
Environmental Specialist
9.04.08 Administrative Adjustment -new process
Nick Casalanguida and Growth
Management Division Staff
10.01.02 Development Orders Req_Early Construction Authorization
Jamie French, Operations and
Regulatory Management
Note: At the March 7th EAC meeting the Council recommended approval, with comments, of the LDC
Amendment to 4.07.02 (Design Standards for PUD usable open space). Since that time, the amendment has
been revised and included in 1.08.02 (Definitions- usable open space). Due to the change in the proposed LDC
language, the amendment has been brought back for re- review.
3/28/12
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Bold text indicates a defined term
LDC Amendment Request
ORIGIN: Board Directed
AUTHOR: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager
DEPARTMENT: Growth Management Division, Land Development Services
AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2012 Cycle 1
LDC SECTION(S): 1.08.02 Definitions
4.02.01 Dimensional Standards for Principle Uses in Base Zoning
Districts
4.07.02 Design Standards for Planned Unit Developments
CHANGE: To amend Section 1.08.02 to include "required yard" in the usable open space
definition.
The change to the definition of "usable open space," creates an inconsistency with the definitions
provided in Section 4.02.01 Dimensional Standards for Principle Uses in Base Zoning Districts
and Section 4.07.02 Design Standards for Planned Unit Developments. Staff recommends both
sections are revised for clarity and that these definitions are removed to prevent potential
conflicts with future changes.
REASON: During the January 25, 2007 hearing for the Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR),
the Board of County Commissioners discussed with Staff and other participants the usable open
space definition. The discussion identified the usable open space definition did not include the
terms "yard and lawn," and therefore these areas had not been included in the usable open space
calculations during reviews by staff. The speakers noted that these terms had been included in
the applied definition in prior years and reviews by staff. Further, that "yards and lawns" were
included in usable open space definition for the recent plan for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use
District. The proposed language stems from this dialogue and adds the term "required yard" to
the usable open space definition. The term "required yard" identifies the area outside of the
setbacks of the principal building structure. This addition will provide clarity to calculating the
usable open space within residential and mixed use developments.
Removing the usable open space definitions in sections 4.02.01 and 4.07.02 will eliminate
inconsistencies with the future revisions.
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: The proposed change will ease the burden for
residential developments, particularly for smaller infill parcels, in meeting the sixty (60 %)
percent usable open space requirement for residential developments. Further research and
discussion are warranted to identify any fiscal or operational impacts to the County.
RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: Growth Management Plan, Rural Fringe Mixed
Use District
H: \Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012\4 -Apr - 108 02
Definitions usable open space 032012final.doc 3/28/2012 3:08 PM
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Bold text indicates a defined term
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: Useable open space is identified in the FLUE,
for Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Receiving Lands. The policy is written as follows:
(IX) B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
(IX) A) Receiving Lands
7. Open Space and Native Vegetation Preservation Requirements:
(XV) a) Usable Open Space: Within Receiving Lands projects greater than 40 acres in size shall
provide a minimum of 70% usable open space. Usable Open Space includes active or passive
recreation areas such as parks, playgrounds, golf courses, waterways, lakes, nature trails, and
other similar open spaces. Usable Open Space shall also include areas set aside for
conservation or preservation of native vegetation and lawn, yard and landscape areas. Open
water beyond the perimeter of the site, street right -of -way, except where dedicated or donated
for public uses, driveways, off - street parking and loading areas, shall not be counted towards
required Usable Open Space (GMP, FLUE pg. 71 -72).
To ensure future developments are consistent with the GMP usable open space provisions,
additional language identifying the higher standards in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District has
been included in the proposed amendment.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends utilizing the proposed language as an
interim standard and reexamining the open space issue in a more comprehensive manner during
the next LDC Amendment cycle. The existing requirements and definitions can be revised to
better differentiate open space and recreation areas. Further analysis may determine that specific
types of open spaces should be incentivized, prioritized or limited. Furthermore, there are several
planning efforts within the County, such as the Master Mobility Plan and the Low Impact Design
(LID) Recommendation of the Watershed Management Plans which are in progress and may
include examining open space needs and functionality and provide a more comprehensive
approach to open space.
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
DSAC: Recommended striking the word usable in an earlier draft. At that time, it had not been
proposed to include "required yard" in the definition. In a second review of the definition
changes, DSAC recommended the following text change: "Usable Open space areas shall also
include those portions of areas set aside for preservation of native vegetation, and lawn, yard and
of landscaped areas (whether privately or publicly owned) ..."
EAC: The EAC reviewed an earlier draft which maintained 60% open space for a residential
development, half of which would be usable open space. The EAC recommended that this only
apply to developments 20 acres or less.
OTHER NOTESNERSION DATE:
Prepared by Caroline Cilek, Senior Planner on March 9, 2012; March 15, 2012; March 20, 2012
Amend the LDC as follows:
2
H: \Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012\4 -Apr - 108 02
Definitions usable open space 032012final.doc 3/28/2012 3:08 PM
Text underlined is new text to be added.
TeXt StAk8thFOUgh 06 GWFFAAt text to be del
Bold text indicates a defined term
1 1.08.02 Definitions
2 Open space: Areas that are not occupied by buildings, impervious parking areas, streets,
3 driveways or loading areas which may be equipped or developed with amenities designed to
4 encourage the use and enjoyment of the space either privately or by the general public.
5 Examples of open space include: areas of preserved indigenous native vegetation; areas
6 replanted with vegetation after construction; lawns, landscaped areas and greenways; outdoor
7 recreational facilities; and, plazas, atriums, courtyards and other similar public spaces.
8
9 Open space, common: Those areas within or related to a development, not in individually
10 owned lots designed and intended to be accessible to, and for the common use or enjoyment of,
11 the residents of the development, or the general public.
12
13 Open space, usable: Active or passive recreation areas such as ap rks, playgrounds, teRRis
14 seats, golf courses, beaGh fFentage, waterways, lakes, IageeRs, mss, nature trails and
15 other similar open spaces. Usable Open space areas shall also include those portions of areas
16 set aside for preservation of native vegetation, required yards (setbacks) and of landscaped
17 areas, which are accessible to and usable by residents of an individual lot, the development, or
18 the general public. Open water area beyond the perimeter of the site, street rights -of -way,
19 except where dedicated or donated for public uses, driveways, off - street parking aFGa6,, and 9#-
20 street loading areas, shall not be counted !R dGteFmiR'Rq towards required 4Usable 90pen
21 sSpace.
22 # # # # # # # # # # # # #
23 4.02.01 Dimensional Standards for Principle Uses in Base Zoning Districts
25 B. Usable eOpen space requirements Usable open space shall be provided as
26 follows except as required in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District within the
27 Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan.
28 '
29
30
31
32
33
34 1. In residential developments, at least sixty (60) percent of the gross area
35 shall be devoted to usable open space. This requirement shall not apply
36 to individual single- family lots less than 2.5 acres in size.
37 2. In developments of commercial, industrial and mixed use including
38 residential, at least thirty (30) percent of the gross area shall be devoted
39 to usable open space. This requirement shall not apply to individual
40 parcels less than five (5) acres in size.
41 3. Historical /archaeological resources that are to be preserved may be
42 utilized to satisfy required setbacks, buffer strips or open space up to
43 the maximum area required by development regulations. Conservation
44 of such historic or archaeological resources shall qualify for any open
45 space requirements mandated by the development regulations.
46 # # # # # # # # # # # # #
47 4.07.02 Design Standards for Planned Unit Developments
3
H: \Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012\4 -Apr - 108 02
Definitions usable open space 032012final.doc 3/28/2012 5:06 PM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Bold text indicates a defined term
G. Open space requirements. Usable open space for PUDs shall be provided as
follows except as required in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District within the
Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan.
spaG8.
1. Within PUD districts composed entirely of residential dwelling units an
accessory uses;; at least sixty (60) percent of the gross area shall be
devoted to usable open space.
2. Within PUD districts containing, commercial, industrial and mixed use
including residential, at least thirty (30) percent of the gross area shall be
devoted to usable open space.
percentage of the gross project area'sna+f may De reauirea to ue
dedicated to public use. as usable epefl7H�a�-
4
H: \Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012\4 -Apr - 108 02
Definitions usable open space 032012final.doc 3/28/2012 5:06 PM
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Te)d GtFikethFOUgh '6 GWFF8Rt text to be deleted.
Bold text indicates a defined term
LDC Amendment Request
ORIGIN: Growth Management Division — Planning and Regulation
AUTHOR: Stephen Lenberger, Senior Environmental Specialist
DEPARTMENT: Land Development Services
AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2012 Cycle 1
LDC SECTIONS: 4.02.14 Design Standards for Development in the ST and
ACSC -ST Districts
9.04.02 Types of Variances Authorized
CHANGE: Clearly identify in 4.02.14, the requirements which apply to the Special Treatment
(ST) Overlay District and those which only apply to the Big Cypress Area of Critical State
Concern Special Treatment (ACSC -ST) Overlay District.
Clarify in 4.02.14 D, the separate review and approval process for Copeland and Plantation
Island mobile home sites located within the Urban Designated Area, as these are different than
for other areas of the ACSC -ST.
Allow variations from site alteration criteria for Plantation Island (unrecorded) subdivision,
pursuant to the §380.032(3) Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and the
Florida Department of Community Affairs dated April 26, 2005, to be reviewed and approved
administratively at the time building permits are reviewed.
Bring Section 4.02 14 up to date with other provisions of the LDC and reference applicable
sections of the LDC as needed.
Grammatical and other corrections
REASON: There are additional review criteria and procedures which only apply to the ACSC -
ST Overlay District and not the ST Overlay District, and which criteria and procedures apply to
what Overlay District is not clearly identified in the LDC.
The language in 4.02.14 D is not clear as to the process of review for development in the Urban
Designated Areas of Copeland and Plantation Island. The subsection allows development in
these areas to be reviewed and approved administratively for compliance with Big Cypress Area
of Critical State Concern Special Treatment (ACSC -ST) regulations, without having to file a
petition for site alteration or site development plan approval. Review for compliance for ACSC -
ST regulations occurs at the time building permits are submitted. Although petitions for Special
Treatment (ST) permits are not required for development within the Urban Designated Area of
Copeland and Plantation Island, an oversight occurred when the provision was included in the
LDC. The provision should have also excluded development in these areas from the ST
procedures for site alteration and site development plan approval. All applicable subsections
should have been referenced in the separate review process for Copeland and Plantation Island.
HAPlanning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SL).doc
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Bold text indicates a defined term
In keeping with the intent of the BCC to create less of a burden to build on lots within the Urban
Designated Area of Copeland and Plantation Island, staff propose to allow the variance pursuant
to subsection 9.04.02 B.1, as authorized by the §380.032(3) Agreement between the Board of
County Commissioners and the Florida Department of Community Affairs dated April 26, 2005,
to be approved administratively as part of the ST review process pursuant to 4.02.14 D. The
Agreement states the following with regards to the variance approved pursuant to this
Agreement.
"Minimum Development. A development order which authorizes the following development on
a group of adjacent lots under common ownership, including on a single lot if only one is owned,
within the area described in paragraph 2 shall be an appropriate variance under Fla. Admin. R.
28- 25.001:
Site alteration, including dredging and filling, of up to 2,500 square feet, regardless of the pre -
development vegetation."
Staff proposes that the building permit, along with review for compliance with ACSC -ST
regulations, would be the appropriate development order authorizing the variance pursuant to
this Agreement.
In some instances the provisions in 4.02.14 are outdated and in need for rewrite. Numerous
revisions to the LDC have occurred since this section was originally written.
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS: As building permits in Copeland and Plantation
Island are already reviewed for compliance with Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern
Special Treatment (ACSC -ST) regulations, no additional cost would be incurred by the County.
According to the fee schedule approved by the BCC, the cost of a residential variance petition is
$2,000. In addition to fees saved on the part of lot owners in these areas, time would be saved in
the processing of these variances.
RELATED CODES OR REGULATIONS: §380.032(3) Agreement between the Board of
County Commissioners and the Florida Department of Community Affairs dated April 26, 2005
(3608809 OR: 3788 PG: 3788)
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN IMPACT: The Agreement between the Board of
County Commissioners and the Florida Department of Community Affairs is referenced in the
FLUE.
Criteria for review in Goal 10 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME),
for development within the Special Treatment (ST) Overlay District are required and referenced
in CCME Policies 10. 1.7 and 10.3.15. These Policies state the following.
Policy 10.1.7:
Objective 10.1 and its accompanying policies and the LDC shall serve as criteria for the review
of proposed development within the "Special Treatment" ( "ST ") Zoning Overlay District.
2
HAPlanning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SQ.doc
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text Fitriket'hmi-igh 06 GUFF8Rt text W be deleted.
Bold text indicates a defined term
Policy 10.3.15:
All new development proposed on undeveloped coastal barrier systems shall be reviewed
through the County's existing "Special Treatment" ( "ST ") zoning overlay district. Objective 10.3
and its accompanying policies shall serve as criteria for such review.
OTHER NOTESNERSION DATE: Created March 14, 2012. Amended March 19, 2012
Amend the LDC as follows:
1
2 4.02.14 - Design Standards for Development In the ST and ACSC -ST Districts
3 A.
4 All development orders issued within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State
5 Concern Special Treatment Overlay ( ACSC -STJ aFea shall comply with the
6 Florida Administrative Code, as amended, Boundary and Regulations for the
7 Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern.
8 B.
9 All development orders issued for projects within the Bog GYPFe6G Area o
10 ACSC -ST shall be transmitted to the State of Florida,
11 Department of Community Affairs, for review with the potential for appeal to
12 the administration commission pursuant to Florida Administrative Code,
13 development order Requirements for Areas of Critical State Concern.
14 C.
15 Site alteration within the ACSC -ST.
16
17 Site alteration shall be limited to ten (10) percent of the total site size,
18 and installation of nonpermeable surfaces shall not exceed fifty (50)'
19 percent of any such area. However, a minimum of 2,500 square feet
20 may be altered on any permitted site.
21 2.
22 Any nonpermeable surface greater than 20,000 square feet shall
23 provide for release of surface runoff, collected or uncollected, in a
24 manner approximating the natural surface water flow regime of the
25 area.
26 3.'
27 Soils exposed during site alteration shall be stabilized and retention
28 ponds or performance equivalent structures or system maintained in
29 order to retain runoff and siltation on the construction site. Restoration'
30 of vegetation to site alteration areas shall be substantially completed
31 within 180 days following completion of a development. Revegetation
32 shall be accomplished with preexisting species except that
33 undesirable exotic species shall not be replanted or propagated.
3
HAPlanning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SL).doc
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Bold text indicates a defined term
34
Exotic species included are enumerated in section 3.05.08 of this
35
code.
36
4.'
37
No mangrove trees or salt marsh grasses shall be destroyed or
38
otherwise altered. Plants specifically protected by this regulation
39
include: all wetland plants listed by the Florida DEP in the Florida
40
Administrative Code.'
41
5.
42
Fill areas and related dredge or borrow ponds shall be aligned
43
substantially in the direction of local surface water flows and shall be
44
separated from other fill areas and ponds by unaltered areas of
45
vegetation of comparable size. Dredge or borrow ponds shall provide
46
for the release of stormwaters as sheet flow from the downstream end
47
into unaltered areas of vegetation. access roads to and between fill
48
areas shall provide for the passage of water in a manner
49
approximating the natural flow regime and designed to accommodate
50
the fifty (50) -year storm. Fill areas and related ponds shall not
51
substantially retain or divert the tidal flow in or to a slough or strand or
52
significantly impede tidal action in any portion of the estuarine zone.
53
6.
54
Manmade lakes, ponds, or other containment works shall be
55
constructed with a maximum slope of thirty (30) degrees to a depth of
56
six (6) feet of water. When mineral extraction is completed in new
57
quarrying lakes, shoreline sloping, planting of littoral shelves with
58
nursery-grown aquatic vegetation, restoration or revegetation of the
59
property, and disposal of spoils or tailings shall be completed before
60
abandonment of the site. Existing quarrying lakes are exempt from
61
this provision, except that whenever any person carries out an activity
62
defined in § 380.04, F.S. as amended, as development or applies for
63
a development permit as defined in § 380.031, F.S. as amended, to
64
develop any existing quarrying lake area, these regulations shall
65
apply.
66
7.'
67
Finger canals shall not be constructed in the ACSC -ST area.
68
8.+
69
This rule shall not apply to site alterations undertaken in connection
70
with the agricultural use of land or for the conversion of land to
71
agricultural use.
72
9.i
73
Drainage.
74
a.
75
Existing drainage facilities shall not be modified so as to
76
discharge water to any coastal waters, either directly or
4
HAPlanning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SL).doc
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Bold text indicates a defined term
77
through existing drainage facilities. Existing drainage
78
facilities shall not be expanded in capacity or length except in
79
conformance with subsection 4.02.14 C.9.b. immediately
80
following; however, modifications may be made to existing
81
facilities that will raise the groundwater table or limit saltwater
82
intrusion.
83
"b.
84
New drainage facilities shall release water in a manner
85
approximating the natural local surface flow regime, through a
86
spreader pond or performance equivalent structure or system
87
either on -site or to a natural retention or filtration and flow area
88
New drainage facilities shall also maintain a groundwater
89
level sufficient to protect wetland vegetation through the use
90
of weirs or performance equivalent structures or system. Said
91
facilities shall not retain, divert, or otherwise block or channel
92
the naturally occurring flows in a strand, slough or estuarine
93
area.'
94
C.
95
New drainage facilities shall not discharge water into any
96
coastal waters whether directly or through existing drainage
97
facilities.
98
d.
99
This rule shall not apply to drainage facilities modified or
100
constructed in order to use land for agricultural purposes or to
101
convert land to such use.
102
10.
103
Transportation.'
104
a.
105
Transportation facilities which would retain, divert or otherwise
106
block surface water flows shall provide for the reestablishment
107
of sheet flow through the use of interceptor spreader systems
108
or performance equivalent structures and shall provide for the
109
passage of stream, strand, or slough waters through the use of
110
bridges, culverts, piling construction, or performance -
111
equivalent structures or systems.
112
b.'
113
Transportation facilities shall be constructed parallel to the
114
local surface flow, and shall maintain a historic ground level
115
sufficient to protect wetland vegetation through the use of
116
weirs or performance- equivalent structures or systems and as
117
feasible, the flows in such works shall be released to natural
118
retention filtration and flows areas.
119
C.
5
HAPlanning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SQ.doc
Text underlined is new text to be added
Text 6tFik9thFOU9h 06 GUFFent text to he dAlAtAd.
Bold text indicates a defined term
120 Transportation facility construction sites shall provide for
121 siltation and runoff control through the use of settling ponds,
122 soil fixing, or performance - equivalent structures or systems.
123 11.'
124 Structure installation.:
125 a.
126 Placement of structures shall be accomplished in a manner
127 that will not adversely affect surface water flow or tidal action.
128 b,
129 Minimum low floor elevation permitted for structures shall be
130 at or above the 100 -year flood level, as established by the
131 administrator of the federal flood Insurance Administration.
132 The construction of any structure shall meet additional federal
133 flood insurance land management and use criteria.
134 C.
135 This rule shall not apply to structures used or intended for use
136 in connection with the agricultural use of the land.
137 D.
138 Port of the Islands, Copeland, and Plantation Island mobile home sites. Port
139 of the Islands, Copeland, and Plantation Island mobile home sites are
140 developments located within the Urban Designated
141 Area, but are also located totally within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State
142 Concern. A portion of the development was determined "vested" by the State
143 of Florida, thus exempting it from the requirements of F.S. ch. 380. There is
144 an existing development agreement between Port of the Islands, Inc., and
145 the State of Florida, Department of Community s, depaFtmeRt of
146 GOMmunity affair-s dated July 2, 1985, which regulates land uses at Port of the
'�" '
147 Islands. Development development within Port of the Islands shall be
148 regulated by the development agreement and the residential density and
149 commercial intensities shall not exceed that permitted under zoning at time of
150 adoption of the GMP. Development within the uFbaR desigRate4,weas Urban
151 Designated Areas of Copeland and Plantation Island mobile home sites shall
152 be reviewed and approved
153 administratively by the County Manager or Ns designee for compliance with
154 Area of Critical State Concern regulations. Development wi4 within the Urban
155 Designated Areas of Copeland and Plantation Island mobile home sites shall
156 not be required to go through the process of filing a petition for site alteration'
157 or site development plan approval, pursuant to seEAGR 4.02.14 G, and not be
158 required to follow the procedures for site alteration plan or site development
159 plan approval pursuant to 4.02.14 E 4 02 14 F.2 and 4 02 14 F.3. This does
160 not exempt site development plan6 FequiFed OR sGGtOOR 10.02.03
161 development orders required pursuant to Chapter 10 of the Code. There is
162 also an agreement for Plantation Island between the Board of County
163 Commissioners and the Department of Community Affairs to allow site
6
HAPlanning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SQ.doc
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
E.
F.
Text underlined is new text to be added
Site alteration plan or site development plan approval required. Prior to the
clearing, alteration, or development of any land designated ST or ACSC -ST,
t#e property owners or #is their legally designated agent shall apply for and
receive approval of a site alteration plan or site development plan, as the
case may be, by the BCC as provided in sestien 4.02.14 F- ibelow).
Procedures for site alteration plan or site development plan approval for
development in ST or ACSC -ST designated land.
1.
Preapplication conference. Prior to filing a petition for site alteration
or site development approval of ST or ACSC -ST land, the petitioner
shall request and hold a preapplication conference with the elaine
designee. The preapplication conference is for the purpose of
guidance and information, and for ensuring insofar as is possible, that
the petition is in conformity with these regulations. NO Pe#+tien fe�kte
#armPl f MCQooinn infil 0— - 1 --..:.
2.
Review and recommendation by
the Countv Manager
.low M,--- c__ —
Council. The site alteration plan or site development plan shall be
submitted to the
designee who shall have it reviewed b the appropriate cou ty
Y county staff.
The County Manager or designee shall then
forward the site alteration plan or site development plan and the
county staff recommendations to the Planning
Commission (CCPC) and the anvirenm ®fatal adyls�n I
mnvlrenmenial Hay sort/ Council (EAC) for review a
recommendation.
EAC
44e Hearinasi
riot requirea to be legally advertised and not required to provi
notice to toe abutting property owners, but shall be held in a
meetina. The -ala MPMCJ �c�rnm� n., CA!`
shall be forwarded to the BCC for final action.
7
H:\Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SQ.doc
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
Text underlined is new text to be added
3. Bold text indicates a defined term
Final action by bpar4 Af sii wty
c;ommissioners (BCC). Final action on the site alteration plan or site
development plan lies with the BCC. The beafd BCC shall review the
proposed site alteration plan or site development plan in a regular
sessien meeting and shall act formally by resolution stipulating
reasons for approval, or approval with modification, or denial of the
site alteration plan or development plan.
4.`
Other permits required. The petitioner may at any time during the
county review process apply for the appropriate local, state and
federal permits for the alteration or development of the subject
property.
5.
Commencement of site alteration or site development. Upon;
obtaining all required local, state and federal permits in order to alter
or develop the subject property, the petitioner may commence
alteration or development in accordance with the conditions and
requirements of said permits.'
G.
Submission requirements for site alteration plan or site development plan
approval for development in ST or ACSC -ST designated land. The following
shall be submitted in a petition for site alteration or site development
approval of ST or ACSC -ST land, where applicable:
1.
PFE)POsed dpyelepmp!:q. De -P
bGWRdaFieE; will 138 GG
8
H: \Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SL).doc
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
Text underlined is new text to be added
Bold text indicates a defined term
#:
t
;sion re uirements ursuant to 10.0:
2.
a
9
H: \Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SL).doc
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
3.
Text underlined is new text to be added
Bold text indicates a defined term
Document that the project is consistent with 3.03-00 and the
Objectives and Policies in Goal 10 of the Conservation and Coastal
Management Element of the GMP
4 -.
b.
d.
e.
10
H: \Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SL).doc
b.
d.
e.
10
H: \Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SL).doc
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
P
Text underlined is new text to be added
Bold text indicates a defined term
GOR60deFatieR of the Iand U68.
All
11
H: \Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SL).doc
Text underlined is new text to be added
374
Bold text indicates a defined term
375
376
H.
377
Exceptions from public hearing requirements. The
378
County Manager or designee may administratively approve a site alteration
379
plan or site development plan for land designated ST or ACSC -ST without
380
the public hearing otherwise required by this section if:
381
382
The area of the proposed alteration or development is five (5) acres
383
or less in gross area; there are no transfer of development rights
384
involved, and the following conditions, where applicable, exist:
385
a.
386
The proposed site alteration or site development will occur
387
on
land that was lawfully cleared and no more than ten percent of
388
the cleared lands have re -grown with native vegetation.
389
b
390
Where the proposed alteration or development involves a
391
single - family principal structure or the renovation or
392
replacement of a single - family structure and the proposed site
393
alteration or site development plan will not require any
394
395
significant modification of topography, drainage, flora, or fauna
on the site. "Significant modification" shall mean modification
396
greater than 15 percent of the site.
397
c
398
No pollutants will be discharged from the area that will degrade
399
the air, water or soil below the levels existing at the time of
400
application.
401
d.
402
Water management berms and structures proposed for the
403
protection and /or enhancement of the ST areas will meet the
404
minimum dimensions permitted by the South Florida Water
405
Management District.
406
2,
407
Temporary site alteration for oil and gas geophysical surveys and
408
testing. "Temporary site" alteration shall mean only those alterations
409
involving and cutting of vegetation for surveys and equipment entry,
410
drill shot holes not exceeding six inches in diameter and rutting
411
associated with vehicle access. Trimming of vegetation for access
412
routes shall be kept to the minimum width necessary for surveying and
413
testing. The site shall be restored as required by federal, state and
414
county permits within 90 -days of t he start of the project.
415
3
12
HAPlanning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031912 - SL).doc
416
41�
418
2 0 Where a cOnditi
4 ona/ Use T °xr u
21 has "derli
422 4. r� been a news "ew
e ppro v eOla text text ro be
42'3 ed' �ndlcates added.
a dePi
�� 4 towo alter, "extern,
S rs to or site
426 S. already eX st nano or °o s etop�ent
428 A// of g tower not oct accesssooUnd akisti
429 Shall be srte alterati e)(ceed fire � trUotUr s COmrhUnica
430 F as regUir on °r sit Gres ssociate tiOn
and F ed to e dev d with an
431 Exem as appl /c con7p1y wit eiopmant
433 t p4 o S' The fol/, w�. able h the provis olnS approva/s o
434 4 F' and Fng activities shall n 1s,2e
4,35 ;Rem be 4
36 2 this ode and control o f ke'nPt from the re
6 Prescrib. ekOt'c vegetation 9Uirements of
3 Depa'tm n o'f Pore, and assOCi as de fined rn Cha
RemOVal o stry; aced firebreaks a Ater 3 of
. , fnOn�native ve9e s appr °ved by the
• tation pursuant to F /orroa
*
*
Chapter 3 of this
* Code
*
%
9-04.02.
types. of V
A aridness u * •
rnclUd varia is Atho
in rized
g the nce
O//0W author,
re9Ure na open w'ng. he. orl2ed for
e space ght
and mini is • S,Ze s, area and d/r/7,,7
mum re height d't I ensi d Site siOn
9Urreme n7a4r)7 °nal of Str'U al deve/o
nts r m aspects Ure, he pm
fo ° str et fiber of anaf land. ' !yht of f ht standard
In. Ptn and ' ,
e king facilities mum se b nd b4 e e of
aCk for SiBnsg
zulationl
(0319j2 . St taff '
Re ' D back u '
). aoc ons � 3
UP material) Eqo Sta f
ports & n7tg handouts
f Re
1201214 pr
40214D and o
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Variances forsigns. The variance
5.06.00 procedure for signs Bold text indicates ned term.
5-06.. the Collier County Sign Code. gns Is
Provided in section
+si '
Ssr
2- -2i-ap
H:IPlanning and RegulationlEgClStaff 14
04 02 B 1 - ACSC -ST (031 g12 - SStaff Reports & back up materiallEgC
Staff Reports & mtg handouts 1201214 -Apr - 4 02 14 D and 9
Text underlined is
DIE' lore# new text to be
ORjG C Amend text i r � b�added.
IN: went Re west B °Id text indicates
Growth Management Division a defined term.
AUTHOR; Nick
Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator
DEPARTMENT: Growth Mana e
g meat Division
AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2012 Cycle
LDC SECTION(S): Y e 1
9.04.08 Administrative Adjustment
CHANGE: The
and land related LDC provides several fo
hardships•
'Variances, ofreliefand
Imposed land related nances, defined in flexibility
after - the -fact hardships. Administrative v Section 9. Y for dimensional
Both residential anncroach 04.03, for
relief for 'technical
meats for structures anances, Section 9.
Develo non - residential structure e ' Includin 04.04 anon self'- -residential g Principal � are li «
standards )provide for the pal and mited to minor
within the
encroachments may
standards development flexibility Y be a l structures."
rural and pment. The Code Y and all °�, app planned U
applied for parking standards. also offers alternatives developers to define theft
during a site mission. e applications areProcessed for inisca
Plan sub pe plans,
However, there are man dministrativel
Processes. Y land related issues Y and can be
array of low Is proposed that an Ad Which do not
the adjustment and I, I— strative Ad' us qualify for relief thJustment nOp -use related issues. An J tment rough these
replace the c while facilitatin process is created
ul'I'ent established g Innovative and `4dmjnistrative to address a
Development (pUD process of requesting Plan Adjustment seeks to balance er
adjustment requests °r Ste Of questing ad just g. This section is
quests within ward p Receiving Area J meats through the p not intended to
and (SRA) rezoning Planned Unit
The Administrative g process but will allow for
administrativel Ad lists s
allows Y Each adjustment pecific types "adjustments
just
for an up to a SO percent di provides a threshold. J meats that c
adjustment minution, but the setback Fort an be approved
rational nexus to the pllcants will be re Ingle, a sign setback
adjustment. required to provide Y not be less than five feet. TO Justment
an improvement to the site Initi
The Administrative based °n a e
order, such Adjustment would be
an insubstantial h as site development applied for concurrently
an plan (SDP), a SDP et a with a
J trnent, the applicant or another develop amendment final local
pplicant pment order. � a site improve development
• must meet the stated To be ment plan
The Zoning Director criteria. granted an Administrative (SIP),
adjustment is the has reviewed the request criteria include:
property and the minimum amount quest and issued an o
surroundin necessary and does not pinion that the
The County Engineer, g neighborhood; negatively prOp°sed
that the re g , °r designee, has reviewed Y affect ad'
Count quest is consistent Jacent an
Y and is coin with the health the request and issued
patible with the current code; safety and
welfare Objectives Opinion
H:IPlannin � e objectives of the
g and RegulationlEAClStaff Reports Administrative Adjustment J ment CCports &back up matenaiiEAC
032112.2•do Staff Reports & mt
Caroline Cilek 3/28201 9 handouts
1201214 -Apr - 9 04 08
2 5:09 PM
' The County Mana
Text underlined is new text to be added.
requirements• ger' °r desi �'es� -i
' Collier County 'and ghee' concurs with the Bold text indicates
requirementsnty has received no written °pinions inasubm -ter
rendered
The Ad objections follo
ministrative Ad•us Wing the
and approved b on orient will be reviewed public notice
applicant not In Co Y Manager Or by the
Count does meet the desi Zonin
Y planning stated crite ' gnee• If the a g Official, the County g Commission na, the applicant may application is be ause ngineer
Within 3 denied
Upon submittal of the 0 days' y appeal the decision the
With' 15 days to su Administrative Ad to the Collier
Properties hounding properties Justment re
within 500 feet o • A quest, applicants
propert fthesub" ppllcants must
Y s address, folio Ject pro must send provide
Justification for number, and re Property. The notice notices to surrounding notice
such will include. I nding
I 1 by 17 inch adJustment s, quested adjustment
written or 8.5 by I 1 inch o (3) a CO (s)' (2) a brief (1) the sub"
objection within 30 days copy °f the site subject
Collier format); (4) advise plan with reference of
County Growth Ys of the date property owners to the ad'
wth of 5) co actheir adjustment
Division. � and (5) contact inforight to sub (in
property owner who
rnatio submit a
Of the date ° receives the n for the
Planning Co f the letter, vhich public notice
mmission Fill require the c •may submit a letter
adjustment is the The Plannin adjustment re °f objection
Policies of the minimum amountg Commission shall c quest to be determined 30 days
decisio GMp, I DC and pUDnecessary; 2 onsider the follo irrimed by the
ns will be heard b O if the ad Wing: (1) if the
y the B ' °r conditional Justment s
Board o f use. i) are consistent
TO appeal the ad Zoning Appeals. Appeals of the P With
ministrative fanning Corn
the public nonce requirement. standin Mission s
the County quirement. pro g shall be
within the designated 0 a owners that do given to the
Adjustment decision. not sub applicant and
Ys, waive the mit a letter of recipients of
REASON; The Ad ability to appeal the Adrninistrat objection to
non -use related • irimistrative Ad • ive
literal application The proGeSSJustrnentProcess will ad
pplication Of a particular re would grant flexibilit dress
Property a wider
Y owner. regulation
may Y to a pro array of to
FISCA Y result in an - Pr Property wner when impact and
L & OPE�TIONAL outcome for the and
v ould include a
Schedule more flexible and reap
would also a res The fiscal and
Adjustment apply Additionalp°nsive Code operational impacts
Per adjustment To staff A fee dete
Justment may be a address multiple will be utilized iriiined by thefor applicants
applied. ple adjustments to review the County Fee
SLATED within one Administrative
Specific Re CODES OR REGULATIONS:
application, a surcharge
quirements for ULATIONS:
Minor After -the F Section 9.04.
GROWTH MANAG act Encroachments variances;
EMENT, PL Section 9.04.04 _
AN IMPACT None.
H:IPlanning and Regulation nIEIn taff Reports 2
Administrative Adjustment CC &back u
P materiailEAC staff Re
032112 -2.doc Carolin ports & mtg handouts
e Cilek 312812012 5:09 PM X201214 -A
Pr - 9 04 08
:IPlan
dmi;
v- 51112- _ --- ',anEAC Staff Reports &
2'dOC Caroline cilia "ePo mtg handouts
012 s:os PM 1201214 -Apr _ 9 04 08
Prepared 1 OTES/VERS7OIY
Edited 2/,7/,2 Y Caroline Cilek DATE:
; Edited 2127112; Planner;
27/12; Edited 3/8/12
Amend the LD
C as follows;
9-0-4.,08.4d
Mlinish
A tr
ative gd•ust
►Went
Edited
7e-xt underlined
nket is new text to be added.
text indicates a defined teen
11/21/11; Edited
11130111; Edited 1/11/12,
1
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25 F
26
27
29
30
31
32
33 n
34 n
35
36 the
37 fir
38
39 ijar
40 r=
41 Pror
42 t� l
4 Collier Count
subsection has i
Submitta/ Re G below
include the uirements.
followin •
mite nt,.,_
Text underlined is
ne�eo be added.
Bold text indicates a def�d to
after ublic
no ti-
A _
administrative anent Code re c uest for administratS�e ent re_ `" sneer or archit�
3, ad'ust uirement is ad'ust Uest.
A si ned written o meet is needed• not feasible or meet Indic
a Chap - �_ ... trllorl fr"., too h. �. �_ atlnrl 1,.►,..
and struc
ThA �.,_,. ures
arto lace v" ur the Collie
H :IP /annin ° enerai circulation °f the Cout
Ad 9 and RegulationlE t ublic he
ministrative gClStaffRe 'Reports n the count arin shall I
Adjus�ent C,C rts &back up materiallEgC at least 15 da
032112 -2.doa Caroline Reports a mt
aroline Ciiek 312812012 handouts
2012 5:09 PM 1201214 -Apr - 9 04 08
1
2
3
5
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
1
S
16 H. A ea /s.
1 1
7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
#
uoiic he
nd the re nest grin s an
Considerations, ed ad'ustment.
pl�rovA The p►..._ _
consider
section C bo
e•
wvlEll cOnditt o
the f
hetholloNrin
�_ �.
Text underlined i
s new text to
8 d ext in be added.
note dicates a
fhe IocaffOn of "_ defined term
'tanning and RegulationjE
`nmistrativeAd' AC�StaffReports &back UP m $
CC 032112_ 12-2-doe Staff
2.dOC RePOrts & mt
Caroline Cilek 3128j201 9 handout
2 5: 9 Pm s 1201214 -Apr _ 9 04 08
Text underlined is new text to be added.
LDC Amendment Re k e� oe a
Bold text a defined term
OR'GIN: Board of Count uest
y Commissioners Directed
AUTHOR; Jamie French, Director, a operations nd Regulatory Management
RTMENT: Growth Management Division
AMENDMENT CYCLE: 2012 Cycle 1
LDC SECTION(S); 10.01.02 Development Orders Required
CHANGE:
To include an Earl
This would allow limited buildin Construction Authorization
plan (SDP), site develo g Construction to occur (ECA) provision within the LDC.
situations and at the Owner's t Plan amendment prior to an a
(SDPA) or site improvem improvement plan development
To apply for an ECA (SIP) in certain
• A form permit, the applicant will need to
provided by the Collier Count meet the follow in
clearly states the developer understands that all s g set of criteria:
Y Growth Management Division is sub
are at his/her own risk and shall abide b
subsection 10.01.02 such preliminar submitted that
C.3. Y the submittal time frame identified construction • The zoning desi
• gnat ion is approved and the use
pe
The proposed vegetation removal complies with�rded
• The site development
submitted and reviewed b, improvement plan or amendment ent ap 1,
Posted. The under] w y the Land Development ment application has been
Y g zoning desi pment Services and the first set of co
The building m
permit a gnation must be appropriate
for the pplication and plans have been ubitte, and the s ments
Portion of work to be authorized for the O permitted.
Department. permit b d and approved
• The building application Y the Collier County Building
and plans have been sub
Portion of work to be authorized for the
and under the Florida Fire Prevention Code. submitted reviewed and approved
permit by the Office of the Fire Code Offic 1 e
•
Posting
g of a bond or other surety
construction improvements will be removed if the dev
acceptable to the Count
necessary de improvements Y, to ensure that any
amount e pment order or zonin elopment does
equal to an estimated cost g approval. The Bond or not receive the
Manager or designee prepared b surety shall be in an
gnee to remove the prepared the developer and a
The ECA provements granted b pppoved by the County
may be granted once the SDP Y the ECA permit.
comments by the Planning SDPA, or SIP
the review g and Zoning De a has received the initial review
Period by the Plannin p rtment. To expand u with
business days, rather than the standard hurt n upon the
Zoning Department could be conducted in f fifteen amendment, 1)
guarantee, a refund policy for the Plannin Y (30) business days
initial review is not completed y To offer a review service )
fee would be refunded to the a g and Zoning Department can be established. If the
pleted within fifteen (15) business days then a
pplicant. To accomplish ercentage of the review
push this service guarantee, the Collier Count
H:IPlanning and RegulationlEAClStaff
Development Orders Re ReP °rts & back uP materiallEAC Staff Y
q_Early Construction 032812.doc Caroline C lek 3/28/ ts�201214 q r _
P 10 O1 02
2012 3:42 PM
Fee Schedule and
Pee S Review would need to be a Text underlined is new �textto e a dded. w section (pg. 16, II A )mended and reflect a si Batd text indi Limitations o milar refund n the poliC a defined term
improve construction activity y as the Building
ments. Construction the time li Y are included
mutations outline in to Control for unapproved state that he Florida up to the first building Pproved site
"Everypermit issued lorida Buildin uildin
commenced wuthun six shall bec g code g code ins
months °me invalid 'section 105.4 1 inspection subject to
suspended or abandoned after Its issuance unless the Permit intent
bond or suret for a period , or if the work authorized W ork authorized b ' which
the Plan"' Y shall beco of six months Y such
ng and me effective if the applicant after the time f by such Pe Permit is
Zoning Zoning Department does he work is co rmit us
aPpl,cation is denied b Si improve not receive an °mmenced.
y the Cou ments shall be n approved site The
REASON. Y• removed of the Plan from
buildin On May 25, 2010 the Board
site plan or
project g permit prior to the approval of C
Immokalee. The Of the County Commissio
program mana Project met the site plan fort hers authorized the
permit processged by the Economic Develo criteria for the Fa tlTrack Specialties, Incisance of
a
Pment Council (EDC expansion
The Executive ) thaPallata d f incentive
10.02.03 Summary identified the an expedited
the Fast Track flow businesses to use need to create a LD
Track Economic De a similar exception C Amendment to
process is no longer evelopment Project. Process modif
economic develo ger an active incentive Folio within t Y Section
ame Pment and creatin wing the closing he LDC and based on
ndment provides g a busunessproarn" However, theg of the EDC, the Fast
is similar to the Florida for an expedited friendlY enviro County continues to
review, Specialties process in the LD nmenta Priority make
approvalmeef specified criteria, and begun lam will allo the ae Early Constructi nheProposed
ited co the
pplicant to apply Authorization
At re ruction prior to for an
P sent, LDC Section ex
to a n 10 complete site plan expedited
n approved develo 01.02 prohibits
approved. An Pment order, development or
constructio ' exce develo
n prodded aY be obt for pt where an Early Work pinent related activities dined
Manager or Certain criteria
specified site Authorizatio es Prior
Prior to an a designee to issue are met. The Preparation
approved a conditional building expansion of and unfras n cture has been
site 10.01.02 fracture
Plan' Permit for will allow the County
for `� OPERATIO1vAL Mp ruction activity
qualified projects to I ACTS: The
developer The receive a pro
support job proposed amend n expedited review posed amendment
growth and anent targets new process which saves an opportu
creation. wand ex time and pity
RELATED Pandang businesses money for the
Florida Building S OR within the county to
approval Code: 105.12 GULATIONS:
FBC ; Collier Count Work starting Section 105.12 Y Building Blocks Procedure for it issuance 105.13
Early Work Autho • Phased Perm
nzation Per 2004
H:IPlanning and RegulationlE
Development Orders Re (staff Reports 2
& back up materia"EAC
Early Construction staff Reports & mt
032812.doc 9 handouts1201214_
Caroline Cilek 312812012 Apr -
3:42 PM 100102
SLDC ection
amendment 3 OS Text underlined is new
Section 10-01-02 ,. 02 G 1 -7 Exemptions text to be added.
changes would Development Orders Re -from Require B °►d text indicates a etet term'
need to be Required. If either LDC a etc.
combined. , ►s proposing chap
GROWTH MAN C amendment is a changes to
AGE14ENT PLAN I approved all
MPACT: None.
read Th RECOMMENDATION:
code i ECA er►mt allows a StaffprOposes the following
nspeCtion. Const rOVed
a royal. All c0 ion - n ma cConstruction to s� co changes: 1
intent nstrwction is - Continue followin ) 10-01-02-C.2 .a to
, of the Florida subject to the based mmence up to the first b
Buildin time limitations Or com fete wilding
g Code.2 Identified ' buildin e
No change to 1 p r►nit
p 1 02 B In section 105.4.1 Pe
20THER NOTES/VERSION DA 1(032812
,March 28, 2012 E• January ). Imit
nuary 6, 2012; Edited Feb
1 Amend the
2 LDC as fo110 February 21, 2012; March 5
3 ws:
10.01.02 Develo
4 op Orders Re
S A. Develo quired
6 pment Order Re
, ' quireq•
7 related activities No on-site
g prior to approval Including site or off_ .
of the preparation site develo
9 othenNise required °r infrastructure construction, Pment °r develo
10 Drawin develo ment Pment
gs, or. SCP, except Permit including, will be
authorization pt where but not limited develo allowed
11 g - has been a early work' to: SOP, ment order or
13
12 Early Ao►rk Authorizationpproved' authorizatiob
7. A (EW) or earl co SIP Construction
EW permit ma A '
14 more of the following be approved by the
1 S a. g activities: County Manager,
16 b. Vegetation removal or designee,
17 C Excavations; (site clearing); ghee for 1 or
18 d. Site filling;
19 Construction
reonstr coon n normwater
20 and, areas management facilities limited
21 e. interconnection to
22 f Off -site infrastructure. culverts ponds
23 2• T Construction of a ' and Swale systems;
he County may issue Perimeter landscape 25 a emonstrated co an EWA buffer berm,
26 The pro °Sell Ve e with the followin the allowed wall, or fence.
3.05.050. d getation rem to g criteria as activities subJect to
?7 b• County right-of. al Complies with pplicable:
18 C. A determination has Section
9 mination of native vegetation been
d. would co getation toapprOVed;
An excavation with Section be retained for e avation permit has 4 06'p0 landscaping
A Soil and Erosion Control Plan proved; which
f provisions of Section demonstrating
Copies of all approved C, com
limited to: pprOVed AE USF pliance with the
S�MD, ACO ency permits being
WS, and FFwCC submitted, including, but not
H:IPlanning and Regulation) '
Development EACIStaff Reports 3
& back u
Orders ReCLEarI Y Construction materiallEAC Staff onstruction 032812 Reports
(IO & mtg nandoutsl2o121a_
C Caroline Cilek 3/28/2012 Apr _ 10 01 02
3 :42 PM
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
Text underlined is new text to be added.
g Determination of legal sufficiency of the EWq permit b
Bold text indicates a defined term
Attorney's Office;
h• Posting of a Revegetation Bond of not less than $2,00o.00 y the County
$5,000.00 per acre dependent on the character of vegetation nor more than
removed;
I• Assurance that all underlying being
C.U., etc.) y g zoning approvals are in lace e,
' p ( g. PUD,
1• This approval is good for 60 days with the possibility of 2 ea
extensions dependent on the reason for the inability o
approvals. After that time, cleared areas must be graded 30 -day
seeded; y gain proper
k. The developer must clearly state his understanding that ff and hydro-
preliminary construction activities are at his own risk;
a
; ll such
Provide assurance that the schedule of
activities created in accordance with the VRSFP development
time the EWq is issued, and will be a
set forth in Section 4.06.04 A 1.a.vii.d• ' Will commence at the
part of that 18 month time frame as
nstruction Authorization ECA ,_An ECA ermit maj/ .,r-..
al build' nrin� #-
net:
the Florida Buildin
If the ci +o Code.
H:IPlanning and RegulationlEAClStaff Reports & back u
4
Development Orders Re P materiallEAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts1201214_Apr RN—Early ConstIllction 032812-doe Caroline Cilek 3/28/2012 3:42 PM
1001 02
Text underlined is new text to be added.
Text mw WEFIFGI 82 will result in the forfeiture of the Bond or suret rovidedtforcin 10 01n02term Bold
83 9:1a
84 3. Procedure.
85 a. The ECA Dermit shall be reviewed ' the Collier Count
86 Zonin De artment and Plannin and the Buildin De
87 artment thou h a combined
submission process
88 b. Failure to receive an a roved site Ian rior to the ex /ration of the
89 building ermit shall result in the forfeiture of the bond or suret rovided
90 for in 10.01.02 C 1 a
91 # # # # # # #
5
H:\Planning and Regulation \EAC \Staff Reports & back up material \EAC Staff Reports & mtg handouts\2012 \4 -Apr - 10 01 02
Development Orders Req—Early Construction 032812.doc Caroline Cilek 3/28/2012 3:42 PM