CCPC Agenda 03/15/2012 RCCPC
MEETING
AGENDA
MARCH 15, 2012
AGENDA
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., THURSDAY, MARCH 15, 2012,
IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING,
COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA:
NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM.
INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR
GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON
AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE
WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS
MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE
RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED
TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE
PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC
WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE
AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
IF APPLICABLE.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED
A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE
MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS
MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON
WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY
3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA
4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 26, 2012 (CCPC /EAR based GMP Amendments), February 16, 2012
6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
A. PDI- PL2012 -159, The Dunes PUD, a Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to Petition
Number PDI- PL2012 -159 for insubstantial changes to the Dunes Planned Unit Development Master Plan for the
purpose of depicting the area for construction of a 49 slip boat dock facility in the manmade portion of the waterway
labeled "Conservation Easement /Waterway" for property located at 11495 Vanderbilt Drive in Section 20, Township
48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion item to BDE- PL2010 -979) [Coordinator: Nancy
Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner]
1
9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Note: This item has been continued from the November 3, 2011 CCPC meeting, the November 17, 2011 CCPC
meeting, then again from the January 5, 2012 CCPC meeting:
CU- PL2009 -1412: Alico Land Development, Inc. — A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier
County, Florida providing for the establishment of a Conditional Use to allow extraction or earthmining and
related processing and production within a Rural Agricultural Zoning District with Mobile Home Overlay and
Rural Land Stewardship Area (RLSA) Overlay pursuant to Subsection 2.03.01.A.l.c.1 of the Collier County
Land Development Code for a project to be known as Lost Grove Mine located in Sections 5, 6, 7, 8 and 18,
Township 46 South, Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal
Planner]
Note: This item has been continued from the March 1, 2012 CCPC meeting:
B. VA- PL2011 -1410: Wahl Variance - A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida,
relating to Petition Number VA- PL20110001410, for a variance from Land Development Code Section
5.03.06.e.5 to permit a reduced side yard (riparian) setback from 15 feet to 9.3 feet on the eastern boundary of
the property located at 8 Pelican Street West, Isles of Capri in Section 5, Township 52 South, Range 26 East
in Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner]
C. Note: This item has been continued from the March 1, 2012 CCPC meeting:
BDE- PL20110001409: Wahl Boat Dock Extension - A Resolution of the Collier County Planning
Commission relating to Petition Number BDE- PL20110001409 for a 34.6 foot boat dock extension over the
maximum 20 foot limit provided in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code to allow for
a 54.6 foot boat dock facility in an RSF -4 zone on property hereinafter described in Collier County, Florida.
[Coordinator: Michael Sawyer, Project Manager]
10. OLD BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM
13. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA
14. ADJOURN
CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows /jmp
n
n
TO:
FROM:
HEARING DATE:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM 9 -13
Co er County
STAFF REPORT
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND
REGULATION
MARC;,
PETITION VA- PL20110001410 WAHL VARIANCE
COMPANION ITEM: BDE- PL20110001409
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner: Fred and Marci Wahl
100 Port Dock Road
Reedsport, OR 97467
REQUESTED ACTION:
Agent: Joshua W. Maxwell, EIT
Turrell, Hall and Associates
3584 Exchange Avenue
Naples, FL 34104
To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application for a
proposed variance from the required side yard riparian line setback of 15 feet for property with
more than 60 feet of water frontage to 9.3 feet as provided for in Section 5.03.06 E.5 of the Land
Development Code (LDC). The requested action (if approved) would allow a dock facility at 9.3
feet from the riparian line.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject property is located at 8 Pelican Street West, Isles of Capri in Section 5, Township 52
South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida. (See location map on following page)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
n The purpose of the project is to rebuild a grandfathered 363 square -foot dock serving two vessels
within its existing footprint. The proposed dock is an "L" shaped dock that includes a 5.5 to 7.5—
foot wide dock totaling 348± square feet over water. The proposed dock protrudes 54.3 feet into
an 800 -foot long waterway (as measured from the mean high water line (MHWL) to MHWL)).
VA- PL20110001410 WAHL VARIANCE
March 5, 2012 Page 1 of 8
LOCATION MAP
PETITION # VA-PL-2011-1410
ZONING MAP
20 20 x06 220
221
t 2
11u1631e BD x3
201 UR1�
423
222 lo 422
's
CA e
19e 199 a PPP 1e fee +eo �
, azl
234 aza C agpp 420
197 Q 16e 17e 177 NI {
196 191 175
�� {1e
19
19J 17a
195 17J
P � 4y7 419
MARUN BAY
H�Cp
172
391 4J4
IN 167 171 16 368 sr
3es .3 3
165 170 JM
153 154 155 156 157 1>0 156 1W 161 162 16 164 4 310
s9a
J97
I52
� Sy 2834 3J9 K,
79 39 W
1s1
TAHITI CIR. (NASSAU Si. 1sx� 3m
ls9
o�
e 261 �
d 260 3� 335
pq0
3 316 ST D 3]e 4
1w
� 239 �7 C�
347 s7
S
148
TAHITI CIRCLE 269 301
257 270 h
�
3
331 3 V
ss1
Ia
'µ BD 30D
sq
N`r4C
1M 45 1u1a2 141 140 139 1Je 137 ,� � 30a
135
° 3 J37
�3
Ja
307 I'
297
4
Bo Sr 3
ISLES OF CAPRI r •�3
'�Yrn
710311 3z
311
95
73 Sp
325
291 ]1
94
n4 0
73
31 D
31
71e
9J
BD
92
277
2
317
286
of
BD
50
POMPANO BAY BD
49
281 265
o
°2 S
RSF -4 48
263
B D
,,RD
A -ST
as
m se ss u
o— v
54 46
m VO
W BD
HAWK ST. Bo4S
44
61
se w eo 6x N
BD
76 77 76 >, 74 7J 72 70 71 69 06 67 6 65 6J BD {2 V BD
SNOOK BAY
61
W 79
B I I 64 41
Bo a
PELICAN
JB
::• 80 S�fET D
A -ST
u
� � JI
S 6 7 6 10 .tt.
�
MARM
70
BD
4 9 12 IJ 14 15 16 17 1e +o
37D
ZD
BD BD 27
?Z
TJ x4
23 xa BD
RMF
-16
SITE
MARCO RIVER LOCATION
LOCATION MAP
PETITION # VA-PL-2011-1410
ZONING MAP
A
D
r
Z
M
N
a
0
PROPERTY E
BOUNDARY
S
0 10 20 yo
I ti�
5• 6
REBUILT " 2.
DOCK
� bo g;L
9
°v PROPOSED
IRAILING 1y� � -�
wl
Z,
I
¢I
d!
EE I
REQUIRED —
15'SETBACK
7' 'I
in
CNi
.2Z9 �I
6.9'
8 �yg
/ ROPOSED
NEW LIFT
P
41% .
a =t
qy
REQUIRED —
15'SETBACK
BIG MARCO RIVER
3.
6�— PROPOSED
NEW LIFT
�y1
16�
1� 9
1
SITE ADDRESS:
8 PELICAN STREET WEST
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34135
NOTES:
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
SURVEY COURTESY OF: "MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING "
SURVEY DATED: 01494011
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): 71V
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 763
WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 900'
TIDAL DATUM:
MLW (NAVD)- 4.97'
MHW (NAVD)• +0.12'
• PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 749
• TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 749
• TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 94.9'
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. DESIGNED: T.T.T. 5,
WA H � O � � DRAWN BY: RMJ 4.
Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: 05.11 -2011 7.
JOB NO.: 1115 2.
3584'
584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104 -3132 PROPOSED DESIGN SHEET NO.: 5 OF S 11. IRW[12-01-20111JWMI ADDED RIPARIAN SETBACKS
Email: tunaa@tumilassociates.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION -05 TOWNSHIP -52S RANGE -26E
In addition, there are two proposed boat lifts serving two vessels: one is located on eastern side
of the dock and the other on the southern side of the dock. In order to rebuild the dock in its
existing footprint, the existing "T" shaped dock will be rebuilt into an "L" shaped dock to allow
a boat dock lift along the eastern side of the dock. A variance is sought to allow a dock facility
at 9.3 feet from the riparian line.
This variance petition is a companion application to a boat dock extension petition, BDE-
PL20110001409, for a proposed 34.6 -foot extension to the maximum allowed 20 foot boat dock
which would (if approved) would allow a 54.6 -foot long dock.
The Conceptual Site Plan entitled "Wahl Dock - Proposed Design" dated May 11, 2011, and
prepared by Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. illustrates the location of the proposed boat dock and
boat lifts. (See Site Plan on previous page).
According to information provided by the applicant, the neighbor to the west of the subject site
has an existing, approximately 35 -foot long boat dock with a boat house. The neighbor to the
east has an existing, approximately 35 -foot long boat dock.
In addition, Staff has received two letters of objection (see Attachment B).
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
SUBJECT PARCEL: Single - family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF -4
North: Pelican Street West, then a Single - family residence, with a zoning designation of
RSF -4
East: Single - family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF -4
South: Big Marco River
West: Single - family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF -4
VA- PL20110001410 WAHL VARIANCE
March 5, 2012 Page 4 of 8
AERIAL
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
The subject property is located in the Urban Mixed Use Residential land use classification on the
County's Future Land Use Map (FLUM). This land use category is designed to accommodate a
variety of residential uses including single family, multi - family, duplex, mobile home and
mixed -use projects. As previously noted, the subject petition seeks a variance for a single family
home that is located within a single - family subdivision, which is an authorized use in this land
use designation, therefore, the single family home use is consistent with the FLUM. The Growth
Management Plan (GMP) does not address individual variance requests; the Plan deals with the
larger issue of the actual use.
ANALYSTS:
Section 9.04.01 of the Land Development Code gives the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) the
authority to grant Variances. The Planning Commission is advisory to the BZA and utilizes the
provisions of Section 9.04.03 A. through H. (in bold font below), as general guidelines to assist
in making their recommendation of approval or denial. Staff has analyzed this petition relative
to these provisions and offers the following responses:
VA- PL20110001410 WAHL VARIANCE
March 5, 2012 Page 5 of 8
a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the
location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved?
Yes. According to information provided by the applicant, the subject property is located in
an aquatic preserve. The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) limits the
protrusion of docks to -4 feet MLW (mean low water) unless a dock is rebuilt within the
former footprint of the existing dock.
b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action
of the applicant such as pre - existing conditions relative to the property, which are the
subject of the Variance request?
Yes. The original "T" shaped dock was constructed by a different owner. In addition,
according to information submitted by the applicant, there are strong currents in the Marco
River that make it difficult to maneuver. There are also two existing dock which belong to
the neighbors on either side. The neighbor to the west has a dock located only 3.5 feet
away from the subject property. Therefore, to allow safe mooring, the proposed boat dock
configuration was developed.
C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary
and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant?
Yes. The existing site conditions, mentioned above, make it difficult for the applicant to ^
moor his vessel safely. The proposed "L" shaped dock is intended to make it easier to
moor the vessels.
d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of
health, safety and welfare?
Yes. The proposed dock is reasonable while still allowing for safe access for the vessel to
moor within the riparian area.
e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied
by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning
district?
No. Most other neighboring properties moor two vessels. This property owner is seeking
the same.
f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this
Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare?
Yes. The proposed dock design will reduce the impact on the neighboring dock to the west
by relocating boat mooring to the east side of the dock. In addition, the proposed dock will
have no impact to navigation in the river.
VA- PL20110001410 WAHL VARIANCE
March 5, 2012 Page 6 of 8
g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the
goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses,
etc.?
Yes. The boat dock is located within the Rookery Bay Sanctuary Aquatic Preserve.
Because of this, the applicant is restricted to rebuilding the existing dock rather than
reconfiguring the dock's location to accommodate two vessels without a variance.
h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan?
Approval of this variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth
Management Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION:
This variance petition was not required to go before the EAC for review and approval.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report VA -PL- 20110001410, revised
February 29, 2012. - STW
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition VA-
PL- 20110001410, Wahl Boat Dock Variance to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a
recommendation of approval.
VA- PL20110001410 WAHL VARIANCE
March 5, 2012 Page 7 of 8
PREPARED BY:
V'AMJA " I"
NANCY G D A H, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
DEPART T O LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
REVIEWED BY:
RAYM V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
LIAM D. RE JR., P.E., DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN
M
Fcb" 0. ?.BIZ
DATE
Z'1- 1z
DATE
62- -ze -Zvi Z
DATE
-3 _S` —tL
DATE
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the April 24, 2012 Board of County Commissioners Meeting
Attachment: A. Resolution
Attachment: B. Letters of Objection
VA- PL20110001410 WAHL VARIANCE
March 5, 2012 Page 8 of 8
n
RESOLUTION NO. 12-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO
PETITION NUMBER VA- PL20110001410, FOR A
VARIANCE FROM LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
SECTION 5.03.06.E.5 TO PERMIT A REDUCED SIDE
YARD (RIPARIAN) SETBACK FROM 15 FEET TO 9.3
FEET ON THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8 PELICAN STREET WEST,
ISLES OF CAPRI IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 52 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC)
(Ordinance No. 200441, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public hearing after
n notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a variance
from Section 5.03.06.E.5 of the Land Development Code to permit a reduced side yard (riparian)
setback from 15 feet to 9.3 feet as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ", in the RSF -1 Zoning
District for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory
provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said
regulations and in accordance with Section 9.04.00 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land
Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board
in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
Petition Number VA- PL20110001410 filed by Joshua Maxwell of Turrell, Hall and
Associates, Inc. with respect to the property hereinafter described as:
Lot 11, Isles of Capri No. 1, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book
No. 3, Page 41, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida
Folio No. 52340400004
be and the same hereby is approved for a variance to permit a reduced side yard setback from 15
feet to 9.3 feet as shown on the attached Exhibit "A ", in the RSF -1 Zoning District, wherein said
property is located.
Wahl Variance NA- PL2011 -1410
Rev. 12 /8 /11 1 of 2
Attachment A
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Board.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote this day of
2012.
ATTEST:
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK
, Deputy Clerk
Approved as to form and
legal sufficiency:
DRAFT
Steven T. Williams
Assistant County Attorney
Attachment: Exhibit A — Site Plan
CPt 11- CPS - 01126\9
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Wahl Variance NA- PL2011 -1410
Rev. 12/8/11 2 of 2
, Chairman
E:
s~
r
R
D
o�
Z
83, FEET)
- LONGITUTDE: W 8$' 43'53.97" (NORTHING / Y, 5979 7.5DS (SP FL EAST, NAD 83, FEET) COUNTY AERIAL
Twell, Hall & Associates, Inc. L 9:> Q <I—",, K
Marine & Environmental Consulting
3584ExchangeAve. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 LOCATION MAP
Email: tuns irmmllassociares.com Phone: (239) 643 -0166 Fix: (239) 643- 6632
Exhibit A
SECTION -05 TOWNSHIP -528 RANGE -26E
'Awl-I I .. r. =', M I
_'- 4040*4*
m �, � , a. ' NOM '' -�
. /
NEIGHBORING �--- 22.8' '22.9' ,11 THIS PORTION OF THE DOCK HAS
DOCK'S EXISTING h BEEN REMOVED IN COOPERATION
ztig DOCK '9 WITH DEP'S LETTER DATED MARCH 9,
wt--�` 28 „6' vrzlp� 2011. (CERTIFIED MAIL NO.
7010187000018/4775170)
Z' til'° ?
1 9 z
Z Q SITE ADDRESS:
8 PELICAN STREET WEST
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34135
REQUIRED -- / �615' SETBACK EXISTING MOORIN Noyes:
• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
PILES[. R FQ I.II R FD ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON XT REFERENCED TOW W
15' SETBACK SURVEY COURTESY OF: -MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING
SURVEY DATED: 04H3011
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF), TT
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 762
WIDTH OF WATERWAY. MHW TO MHW (APP)(): 400'
TIDAL DATUM:
- MlW {WINDY •1.N'
MHW (NAVO)• MA2'
BIG MARCO RIVER . TOTAL PROPOSED OVATER STRUCTURE (APPX N): WA
TOTAL OVERWATER STRUC711RE (APP)( 6F); WA
TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM UKAL' MI.O'
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.
DESIGNED T.T.T. s
VVA H L C]► C� G K CREATED, R� ..
Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED' 0�, +•20,1 _
.waNO.. , +,5 2.
3 584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104 -3732 EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AERIAL SHEETING._ 20FE 1. RMJ,2-07.20„ ,wM ADDEDRIPARIA4SETBACKS
Emil: fpn2(I 1umlkassOCIatnxom PhOne: (239) A3 -0166 Fax: (239) 643 -M32 SECTION- 05 TOWNSHIP-525 RANGE- 26E
iX7 STING
sc�cE�x r
a
#+�1 SEAWALL
EXISTING
q t '. OORI I G 1
261- .
u�
PILE
1
29'3'
NEIGHBORINt�
DOCK
NEIGHBORING �--- 22.8' '22.9' ,11 THIS PORTION OF THE DOCK HAS
DOCK'S EXISTING h BEEN REMOVED IN COOPERATION
ztig DOCK '9 WITH DEP'S LETTER DATED MARCH 9,
wt--�` 28 „6' vrzlp� 2011. (CERTIFIED MAIL NO.
7010187000018/4775170)
Z' til'° ?
1 9 z
Z Q SITE ADDRESS:
8 PELICAN STREET WEST
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34135
REQUIRED -- / �615' SETBACK EXISTING MOORIN Noyes:
• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
PILES[. R FQ I.II R FD ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON XT REFERENCED TOW W
15' SETBACK SURVEY COURTESY OF: -MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING
SURVEY DATED: 04H3011
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF), TT
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 762
WIDTH OF WATERWAY. MHW TO MHW (APP)(): 400'
TIDAL DATUM:
- MlW {WINDY •1.N'
MHW (NAVO)• MA2'
BIG MARCO RIVER . TOTAL PROPOSED OVATER STRUCTURE (APPX N): WA
TOTAL OVERWATER STRUC711RE (APP)( 6F); WA
TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM UKAL' MI.O'
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.
DESIGNED T.T.T. s
VVA H L C]► C� G K CREATED, R� ..
Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED' 0�, +•20,1 _
.waNO.. , +,5 2.
3 584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104 -3732 EXISTING CONDITIONS WITH AERIAL SHEETING._ 20FE 1. RMJ,2-07.20„ ,wM ADDEDRIPARIA4SETBACKS
Emil: fpn2(I 1umlkassOCIatnxom PhOne: (239) A3 -0166 Fax: (239) 643 -M32 SECTION- 05 TOWNSHIP-525 RANGE- 26E
q
Lri
M
/yy
-hO o
Zo
hy1
EXISTING 3.5' 3'
NEIGHBORING
DOCK
REQUIRED e
15' SETBACK
6'
w I
Z h
� 2y.
2
Q
S
0 !0 20
40
&Aa IN 227
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
I 777Lh
2 L Lo a b1 M
15.2' hn�
00 cV
co
r"-- 22.8' h1
EXISTING y
DOCK h9 e t
2h'S
EXISTING MOORING --V
PILES REQUIRED -
15'SETBACK
BIG MARCO RIVER
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. VV16011111L H L— d O <-"*, K
Marine & Emrironmental Consulting
3584Lxrl)angeAve.SnilcB. Naplrs.FL34104 -3732 EXISTING CONDITIONS
LmaiL ••Nn3!iymrtcll- ac�(�ciuc�s„cum pMrne:(23�►h43 -01ti6 Fax: {'2i4)G43�i632 , �M...,,,.„. �, ..�,�,..�...,..,.,�.�.._- - -.... ___...__.. _ . -. ..__ _.
35.9' ---- -• I
36.2' -- ---• -1
EXISTING
NEIGHBORING
DOCK
SITE ADDRESS:
8 PELICAN STREET WEST
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34135
NOTES:
• THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMIT71NO PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
• ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
SURVEY COURTESY OF- "MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING "
SURVEY DATED: 0x-36 -2011
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF), 75'
• EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF) 363
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX). 600'
• TIDALOATUM.
MLW (NAVD)• -1.63'
MHW (NAVD)• +0A2'
• PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): NIA
• TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): WA
• TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 66.6'
'ESIGNEV, ITIT r
SECTION -06 TOWNSHIP -52S RANGE -26E
c
n
REBUILT
DOCK -
[
BO
7
PROPOSE
v
•7 77 ��3
I
a
U
z�f
tiy�
z; f
z
0 s'
N
�y5
c
N
un
PROPOSEp
NEW LIFT -i
ISO"
-X
REQUIRED
i 5' St i UA1.1m
BIG MARCO RIVER
THIS PORTION OF THE DOCK HAS
SEEN REMOVED IN COOPERATION
WITH DEP'S LETTER DATED MARCH 9,
2011. (CERTIFIED MAIL NO.
70101870000184775170)
SITE ADDRESS-
8 PELICAN STREET WEST
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34135
NOTES:
• THESE ORANANGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
• ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED 10 MLW
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: "MARCO SUPIVEYNG AND MAPPING
SURVEY DATED: 06.78 -Ml
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF), TV
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 383
'MOTH OF WATERWAr, MHW TO MHVV (APPX), 800'
TIDAL DATUM:
MLW (NAVD)- .1AT
MHW (NAVDp 0.02'
PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 348
TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE IAPPX SF): 3"
TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 94C
DESIGNED. 7.T.T, 5,
Terrell, Hall & As'OCiates, Inc. p C K �,�r SIT -0t, 3.
Marinc & Environmental Consulting JOHND. ,s 2 - -
35R4FxchangeAYe.SuiteD. Naples,FL341W3732 PROPOSED DESIGN WITH AERIAL SHEET NO.; ,DEB 1. RMl 12 -0,�II .NSA AbdEDPoPARMN6ETRACKS
Gmail :tuna {aturreibacstXia(LS.caII PhunD:(234)643 -0166
239) 643-6632 - 5ECTION -05 TOWNSHIP -528 RANGE -26E
REBUILT
DOCK -
[
BO
PROPOSE
v
•7 77 ��3
I
U
z�f
tiy�
z; f
0 s'
�y5
REQUIRED
15' SF-FBAGK
N
un
PROPOSEp
NEW LIFT -i
ISO"
-X
REQUIRED
i 5' St i UA1.1m
BIG MARCO RIVER
THIS PORTION OF THE DOCK HAS
SEEN REMOVED IN COOPERATION
WITH DEP'S LETTER DATED MARCH 9,
2011. (CERTIFIED MAIL NO.
70101870000184775170)
SITE ADDRESS-
8 PELICAN STREET WEST
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34135
NOTES:
• THESE ORANANGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.
• ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED 10 MLW
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: "MARCO SUPIVEYNG AND MAPPING
SURVEY DATED: 06.78 -Ml
APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF), TV
EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 383
'MOTH OF WATERWAr, MHW TO MHVV (APPX), 800'
TIDAL DATUM:
MLW (NAVD)- .1AT
MHW (NAVDp 0.02'
PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 348
TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE IAPPX SF): 3"
TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHWL: 94C
DESIGNED. 7.T.T, 5,
Terrell, Hall & As'OCiates, Inc. p C K �,�r SIT -0t, 3.
Marinc & Environmental Consulting JOHND. ,s 2 - -
35R4FxchangeAYe.SuiteD. Naples,FL341W3732 PROPOSED DESIGN WITH AERIAL SHEET NO.; ,DEB 1. RMl 12 -0,�II .NSA AbdEDPoPARMN6ETRACKS
Gmail :tuna {aturreibacstXia(LS.caII PhunD:(234)643 -0166
239) 643-6632 - 5ECTION -05 TOWNSHIP -528 RANGE -26E
w
z
J
Q:
(L
Fx I
REQUIRED -
15' SETBACK
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
1
zo
6.9' - 12,
ROPOSED
EW LIFT z5a
2h 5
REQUIRED -
15'SETBACK
777-R
.5; 6
REBUILT
,�y 2.
DOCK
ao
as
V-
PROPOSED
r'
RAILINI4--s
a'-
7'
1
zo
6.9' - 12,
ROPOSED
EW LIFT z5a
2h 5
REQUIRED -
15'SETBACK
1� 9
M Q1
BIG MARCO RIVER
zI, s
a i3-
Turrell, Hall& Associates, Inc,
Marine &Environmental Consulting
' 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite H. Naples, FL 34104 -3732 PROPOSED DESIGN
ImaiL IImT(;wrnllassceiates.rnm Phonc: (239)643 0166 Fax: (239) 643.6632 ,�� •„�,,,,, , ,,,,„ ®,� �, „,, • y ,, , .—
E
o
scatrFm+r�r
SITE ADDRESS:
8 PELICAN STREET WEST
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34135
NOTES:
•
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
• ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: 'MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING'
SURVEY DATED: 04.211.2011
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): TS
• EXISnNG OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 307
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 000'
TIDAL DATUM:
MLW (NAVD)- .1J3•
MHW (NAVD)• .DAY
• PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE(APPX SF): 3411
• TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 3411
• TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHW L: 04.0'
DESIGNED. T.T.T. 5 '
DRNMI SY: RMJ 4,
CREATED, 05.11.2019 3.
JOB NO.: 1175 2
SHEET ND. 5 OF 0 i2.014011 J14M I ADDED RIPARNN 3ETSA.CH
SECTION -05 TOWNSHIP -529 RANGE -26E
777-R
.5; 6
5
,�y 2.
PROPOSED
r'
NEW LIFT
1� 9
M Q1
BIG MARCO RIVER
zI, s
a i3-
Turrell, Hall& Associates, Inc,
Marine &Environmental Consulting
' 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite H. Naples, FL 34104 -3732 PROPOSED DESIGN
ImaiL IImT(;wrnllassceiates.rnm Phonc: (239)643 0166 Fax: (239) 643.6632 ,�� •„�,,,,, , ,,,,„ ®,� �, „,, • y ,, , .—
E
o
scatrFm+r�r
SITE ADDRESS:
8 PELICAN STREET WEST
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34135
NOTES:
•
THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
• ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
• SURVEY COURTESY OF: 'MARCO SURVEYING AND MAPPING'
SURVEY DATED: 04.211.2011
• APPLICANT OWNED SHORELINE (APPX LF): TS
• EXISnNG OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 307
• WIDTH OF WATERWAY, MHW TO MHW (APPX): 000'
TIDAL DATUM:
MLW (NAVD)- .1J3•
MHW (NAVD)• .DAY
• PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE(APPX SF): 3411
• TOTAL OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF): 3411
• TOTAL PROTRUSION FROM MHW L: 04.0'
DESIGNED. T.T.T. 5 '
DRNMI SY: RMJ 4,
CREATED, 05.11.2019 3.
JOB NO.: 1175 2
SHEET ND. 5 OF 0 i2.014011 J14M I ADDED RIPARNN 3ETSA.CH
SECTION -05 TOWNSHIP -529 RANGE -26E
54.6'
17.5' 12' 3' 7.5'
PROPOSED RAILING PROPOSED REBUILT BOAT LIFT DOCK
EXISTING
SEAWALL
QA SECTION
0 3 6 12
SCALE IN FEET
12.5'
ALL PILINGS WILL BE WRAPPED
IN PVC FROM 1 FT ABOVE MHW SITE ADDRESS:
\ \ TO 0.5 FT BELOW SUBSTRATE 8 PELICAN STREET WEST
MARCO ISLAND, FL 34135
NOTES:
• ��� \� \ 'f;.^ ' 4 . THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND
ARE NOT;NTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE
SHOWN
ff / ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW
SURVEY COURTESY OF: 'MARC. SURVEYING AND MAPPING'
SURVEY DATED: R STRUCTURE
MOTH APPLICANT
WATERWAY. SHORELINE MKIN LFj: )
\ � t EXISTING OVERWATER STRUCTURE (APPX SF)' !!3
MOTH ERWAY. MHW TO MMW (APPX). a00'
TIDAL DATUM.
PROPOSED PROTRUSION FROM STRUCTURE 4' SF): 216
TOTpI. OVERWATERSTIRUCTURE IAPPX SP) N!
\\
TOTAL PRorausloN PROM MHWL a.c
i
{
T TT
Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc, V�I/,A H Q G C 1100
CRE �� os ....„ 1 _
Marine & Environmental Consulting JOB NO :115 12
t3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 341 W3732 DOCK CROSS SECTION SHEe, NO.- 6OF6
Email: 1uparitumll- mciate5R0al Phone: (239) 643. )160 Fax: (239) 64Ni632 - ,.,� ...�. �,n„�..�. -. -.�.- SECTION -05 TOWNSHIP- 52S RANGE - 25E
GundlachNancy
^From: Josh Maxwell [Josh @turrell- associates.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 3:26 PM
To: GundlachNancy
Subject: RE: Petition # BDE- PL20110001409
Nancy,
We understand Mr. Spiegel's concerns but feel he may not fully understand why the Wahl's need the BDE and Variance.
Reason for BDE: The Wahls are not requesting to extend their dock any further than the existing structure. It will in fact
protrude 4 ft. less than the existing mooring pilings associated with the existing dock. The reason they require a BDE is
because they would like to re- construct a grandfathered dock that was built prior to the BDE requirement and add two
boat lifts. This will allow them to replace their dock with a safe, new structure and provide them safe mooring for their
vessels, just like the majority of the docks around Isles of Capri.
Reason for the Variance: The Wahls would like to moor one vessel on the eastern side of their dock, with Collier
County's current riparian offsets there is not enough room to install the lift without either moving the dock (not
permitted by DEP) or acquiring a Variance from Collier County. The new dock and lift will actually be approximately 4ft
further from the eastern riparian line than the dock that was in place from 1995 -2011 (see CollierAppriaser.com for
Aerials).
The new dock design will not interfere with any neighboring vessel's ingress /egress and the slips will be usable during all
n tidal cycles. Just like any dock on the Marco River, some skill will be required to moor in the swift current, which the
Wahls already know about. This design does not alter either neighbor's view from what they have had for the last 27
years, it simply allows the Wahls to utilize boat lifts like the majority of the Docks around Isles of Capri, including Mr.
Spiegel.
Regards,
Joshua W. Maxwell, E.LT.
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.
Marine S Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Avenue
Naples, FL. 34104 -3732
Phone: (239) 643 -0166
Fax: (239) 643 -6632
Web: www.turrell - associates.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS
ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT 1S PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL. WORK PRODUCT AND /OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE
UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT (OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE
FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT), YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF
THIS COMMUNICATION IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONING US
(COLLECT) AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ADDRESS ABOVE AT OUR EXPENSE.
From: GundlachNancy [mailto:NancyGundlach @colliergov.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 3:55 PM
To: Josh Maxwell
Subject: FW: Petition # BDE- PL20110001409
Attachment B
Please see Letter of Objection below.
From: GundlachNancy
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:47 PM
To: SawyerMichael
Subject: RE: Petition # BDE- PL20110001409
Thanks, Mike.
From: SawyerMichael
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:34 AM
To: GundlachNancy
Cc: BellowsRay
Subject: FW: Petition # BDE- PL20110001409
Nancy,
Please see below email related to the Wahl Variance and BDE Petitions.
Thanks,
Mike Sawyer
Project Manager, Zoning Services
Land Development Services Department
Growth Management Division, Planning and Regulation
2800 North Horseshoe Drive
Naples, Fl 34104
Tel: (239)252 -2926
From: Art Spiegel [ mai Ito: aspiegel8000 @charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 10:27 AM
To: SawyerMichael
Subject: Petition # BDE- PL20110001409
To: Collier County Planning Commission
Department of Zoning And Land Development
Ref: Petition # BDE- PL20110001409
34.6 foot dock extention
8 Pelican Street West
Naples, Florida 34113
Please be advised that I am a landowner at 4 Pelican Street West. My property was purchsed two years ago with
consideration given for value based on size of my lot and view from my lot. Prior to purchasing the property, I reviewed
my rights of development as well as the rights of the property owners around me. Because of the building codes for my
area, I was assured that my property would be a good investment. The codes for my area were impossed and regulated
by Collier County for my and surrounding properties.
We are now faced with the potential of a landowner getting a variance on restrictions that we, the other landowners rely
on to protect us. Be advised that I am adamantly opposed to the above variance and will take any necessary steps to
stop this variance from being granted.
2
A variance as requested would allow a protusion of the dock to a point that it would extremely limit the present beautiful
,---,,view both East and West that neighbors now enjoy. We invested in and paid for a view that should be limited only by
Defined regulations and laws, not by variances that take from others what is rightfully theirs.
I also note that a dock extention as proposed would not only interfere with the viewshed of neighbors but would also
interfere with neighboring access to their own docks. Please note that there is tremendous current in this area and
navigation is tricky at best.
For reasons above, I respectfully request denial of this request for variance.
Very truly yours,
Arthur S. Spiegel
4 Pelican Street West
Naples, Fl 34113
mailing address; 700 la Peninsula Blvd
PH 1
Naples, F134113
Tel 518- 569 -4004
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send
electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
GundlachNancy
From: Josh Maxwell [Josh @turrell- associates.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 4:13 PM
To: GundlachNancy
Subject: Wahl - Letter of Objection (VA- PL2010 -1410)
Attachments: Objection - Tradewell.pdf
Nancy,
Please find attached a Letter of Objection we received today from George Tradewell. He owns the house two lots west
of the Wahls property, along the Marco River. His dock has two boat lifts and protrudes beyond the 20ft limit (as
measured on www.collierappraiser.com). I am not sure when Mr. Tradewell's dock was built or why he feels the Wahls
should be held to stricter criteria than his own dock, when his own structure does not appear to conform to the rules for
non- BDE docks, but his brief request for denial doesn't really provide us with any real response opportunity. We are
going through this process legally with the County to ensure we follow the rules and there weren't any comments
provided by Mr. Tradewell that would red -flag the propriety of our process to -date.
If you have any questions about Mr. Tradewell's letter or my response please contact me.
Regards,
Joshua W. Maxwell, E.I.T.
Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.
Marine & Environmental Consulting
3584 Exchange Avenue
Naples, FL. 34104 -3732
Phone: (239) 643 -0166
Fax: (239) 643 -6632
Web: www.turrell - associates.com
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSMISSION IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS
ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, WORK PRODUCT AND /OR EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE
UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT (OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE
FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT), YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF
THIS COMMUNICATION IS PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONING US
(COLLECT) AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE ADDRESS ABOVE AT OUR EXPENSE.
From the desk of
George Tradewell
12 W Pelican St- Naples, FL 34113
215 783 8753
Turrell, Hall & Associates. Inc.
3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, Fl.
23 February 2012
Re: Proposed Dock Variance at 8 W Pelican St, Naples, FL 34113
Dear Mr. Maxwell,
I am in receipt of your letter directed to me concerning the above
referenced matter, and I hasten to respond.
In the absence of a hardship, I must object to your proposal, as
submitted, in that it would be unfair to selectively enforce the existing
code knowing that it has been strictly enforced in so many other similar
instances.
Sincerely,
eor ewe I
From: Joan A Evans
To: Nancy Gundlach
Date: March 4, 2012
Subject: Petition #VA -PL 20110001410
Collier County Planning Commission,
Department of Zoning and Land Development
Ref: To permit a reduced sideyard (riparian) setback from 15 feet to 9.3 feet at
8 West Pelican St.
Naples, Fl 34113
I, Joan A Evans, have owned the property at 6 West Pelican Street for 19 years.
Please be advised that I am adamantly opposed to granting this variance.
Riparian rights are those rights incident to the ownership of lands bordering
upon navigable waters. These rights are my rights of ingress, egress, boating,
fishing and the right to an unobstructed view of the channel. They are subject
to "reasonable" governmental restrictions. My right to build a dock to access
navigable waters, lands bordering water which were navigable at the time of
Florida's statehood (3/3/1845), are benefitted by riparian rights. My riparian
rights lines are drawn from the extension of the upland property lines.
Therefore I request you do not grant this petition.
Thank you.
Joan A Evans
6 West Pelican St.
Naples, Florida 34113
AGENDA ITEM 9-C
Co ier County
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
GROWT MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION
HEARING DATE: MARC , 2012
SUBJECT: BDE- PL20110001409, WAHL BOAT DOCK EXTENSION
(COMPANION ITEM: VA- PL20110001410)
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Owner: Fred and Marci Wahl, Agent: Joshua W. Maxwell, EIT,
100 Port Dock Road Turrell, Hall and Associates
Reedsport, Or 97467 3584 Exchange Avenue
Naples, F134104
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner is requesting a 34.6 -foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of
20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, which will allow construction of a boat docking
facility protruding a total of 54.6 feet into a waterway that is 800 feet wide.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject site is located at 8 Pelican Street West and is further described as Lot 11, Isle of Capri
Subdivision, Unit 1, Section 5, Township 52 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, Folio
number 52340400004. (see location map on the following page)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The purpose of the project is to rebuild the current 363 square foot dock facility within the existing
dock footprint. The new facility has been redesigned into an "L" shaped dock with a 5.5 foot wide
access walkway with a 7.5 foot wide terminal platform that serves 2 boat lifts and vessels. One of the
boat lifts will be located on eastern side of the walkway with the second lift located on the southern
side of the terminal platform. The proposed dock is approximately 348 square feet and protrudes.a total
of 54.3 feet into a waterway that is approximately 800 feet wide MHWL (Mean High Water Line) to
MHWL. There is no dredging proposed for this project. The proposed dock requires a 34.6 boat dock
extension and a companion variance petition VA- PL20110001410. It is further noted that a new
residence is currently being constructed on this parcel consistent with Building Permit BP- 2011090231.
BD- PL2011 -1409, Page 1 of 8
Wahl Boat Dock Extension.
February 17, 2011 (revised February 22, 2012)
"M uJM / f
BD- PL2011 -1409, Page 2 of 8
Wahl Boat Dock Extension.
February 17, 2011 (revised February 22, 2012)
CL
z
z
0
N
d
UU
W
IL
0
Ol
H
r
BD- PL2011 -1409, Page 2 of 8
Wahl Boat Dock Extension.
February 17, 2011 (revised February 22, 2012)
CL
z
z
0
N
d
UU
W
IL
0
Ol
H
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
SUBJECT PARCEL: Single Family Residence, with a zoning designation of RSF -4
SURROUNDING:
North: Pelican Street West ROW then Single Family Residence, with a zoning
designation of RSF -4
East: Single Family Residence, with a zoning designation of RSF -4
South: Big Marco River
West: Single Family Residence, with a zoning designation of RSF -4
Aerial photo taken from Collier County Property Appraiser website.
BD- PL2011 -1409, Page 3 of 8
Wahl Boat Dock Extension.
February 17, 2011 (revised February 22, 2012)
ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION:
Environmental Services Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting
of this request. Section 5.03.06(E)(11) (Manatee Protection) of the Collier County Land
Development Code (LDC) is applicable to all multi -slip docking facilities with ten (10) or
more slips. The proposed facility consists of two boat slips and is therefore not subject to
the provisions of this section.
STAFF COMMENTS:
The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) shall approve, approve with conditions,
or deny, a dock facility extension request based on the following criteria. In order for the
CCPC to approve this request, it must be determined that at least four of the five primary
criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met.
Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 and finds the following:
Primary Criteria
1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is
appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and
zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on
unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of
transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate;
typical single -family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi - family
use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island
docks, additional slips may be appropriate.)
Criterion met. The proposed dock facility consists of the reconstruction of the
existing "T" shaped dock and the addition of two boat slips, which is consistent with
the allowed 2 -slip provisions.
2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the
general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application
is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's
application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to
allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.)
Criterion not met. According to the petitioner's application the water depth for the
dock facility are adequate, therefore this criterion is not met.
3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation
within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should
not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel
traffic in the channel.)
BD- PL2011 -1409, Page 4 of 8
Wahl Boat Dock Extension.
February 17, 2011 (revised February 22, 2012)
^ Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, the
proposed facility will not adversely impact navigation due to the width of the
existing waterway which is approximately 800 feet (MHW to MHW). The
applicant notes that the facility has been designed so that it does not impede
navigation.
4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the
width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway
width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The
facility should maintain the required percentages.)
Criterion met. Information provided in the application indicates that the proposed
dock will protrude 54.6 feet into a waterway that is 800 feet in width (MHW to
MHW). Therefore the dock facility will protrude approximately 6.8 percent of the
waterway width which means that it meets this criterion.
5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the
facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility
should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.)
Criterion met. According to the drawings submitted and noted by the petitioner, the
proposed facility has been designed so that it does not interfere with adjacent
^ neighboring docks or access.
Secondary Criteria
1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the
subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and
location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special
condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline
reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.)
Criterion met. The proposed dock design as noted in the application is consistent
with the limitations imposed by DEP for new docks in Aquatic Preserves. Those
limitations include no protrusions exceeding 4 feet past Mean Low Water (MLW)
line unless the dock is built within the footprint of an existing dock, which is the
case for the proposed dock facility. The application notes that the alternative,
following DEP limitations, will result in a dock facility allowing the mooring of
only one vessel that would include more challenging dock ingress and egress due to
waterway currents occurring along the Big Marco River. Therefore the proposed
facility meets at least one special condition related to the property in that it is
limited by DEP provisions for new dock facilities in Aquatic Preserves as well as
the waterway currents occurring along the Big Marco River which reduce the
^ available dock design options.
BD- PL2011 -1409, Page 5 of 8
Wahl Boat Dock Extension.
February 17, 2011 (revised February 22, 2012)
2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the
vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of
excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should
not use excessive deck area.)
Criterion met. The petitioner indicates that the proposed dock facility includes the
reconstruction of an `L" shaped dock with a 5.5 -foot wide walkway leading to a 7.5-
foot wide platform allowing access and service to the two proposed vessels. Further
it is noted that this deck area is consistent with the footprint of the current dock area.
3. For single- family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in
combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject
property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage
should be maintained.)
Criterion not met. The subject property contains a linear waterfront that is 75 feet in
length according to the application. The total length of the proposed vessels is 65
feet which is more than 50 percent of the waterfront footage.
4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront
view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major
impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.)
Criterion met. The information provided indicates that the proposed facility will not
directly change the views of adjacent parcels because the proposed dock is generally
consistent with existing dock facilities in the area. As noted previously the DEP
Aquatic Preserve limitations impact the design solutions possible for this facility.
5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If
seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(1) of the LDC
must be demonstrated.)
Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, no seagrass
beds are known to be located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility or within
this portion of the waterway. Therefore, there will be no impact to seagrass beds.
6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection
requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable,
compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.)
Criterion not applicable. The proposed facility consists of two boat slips and is
therefore not subject to the provisions of this section.
BD- PL2011 -1409, Page 6 of 8
Wahl Boat Dock Extension.
February 17, 2011 (revised February 22, 2012)
Staff analysis indicates that the request meets four of the five primary criteria. With regard
to the six secondary criteria one of the criteria is found to be not applicable, the request
meets four of the remaining five secondary criteria.
APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS:
As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the CCPC takes action, an aggrieved
petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to the Board
of Zoning Appeals. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Division
Administrator within 30 days of the action by the CCPC. In the event that the petition has
been approved by the CCPC, the applicant shall be advised that he /she proceeds with
construction at his/her own risk during this 30 -day period.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for BD- PL20110001409, revised
on February 22, 2012.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the CCPC approve Petition BD-
PL20110001409 subject to the following stipulation:
1. Subject to the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) approving
companion petition VA- PL20110001410.
Attachments: A. Resolution
B. Application
BD- PL2011 -1409, Page 7 of 8
Wahl Boat Dock Extension.
February 17, 2011 (revised February 22, 2012)
v
C EL SAWYER PROJECT MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
REVIEWED BY:
RAYMGf1TD V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
LIAM D. LOR&Z JR., .E., DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
APPROVED BY:
NICK CASALXNGUIDA,pyrUTY ADMINISTRATOR
GROWTH MANAGEME DIVISION
BD- PL2011 -1409, Page 8 of 8
Wahl Boat Dock Extension.
February 17, 2011
Zol Z
DATE
z -Lf- jz
DATE
oz•
7-2.- Zo/Z.
DATE
2 -23 -1Z
DATE
Attachment A: Draft Resolution
CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 12-
A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BDE -
PL20110001409 FOR A 34.6 FOOT BOAT DOCK EXTENSION
OVER THE MAXIMUM 20 FOOT LIMIT PROVIDED IN
SECTION 5.03.06 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW FOR A 54.6 FOOT BOAT
DOCK FACILITY IN AN RSF -4 ZONE ON PROPERTY
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and
such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC)
(Ordinance 04 -41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County, among which are provisions for granting extensions for boat
docks; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), being duly appointed,
� has held a properly noticed public hearing and has considered the advisability of a 34.6 foot
extension over the maximum 20 foot limit provided in LDC Section 5.03.06 to allow for a 54.6
foot boat dock facility in an RSF -4 zone for the property hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, the CCPC has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and
arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by LDC Section
5.03.06; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given the opportunity to be heard by this
Commission in public meeting assembled, and the Commission having considered all matters
presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
Petition Number BDE- PL20110001409, filed on behalf of Fred and Marci Wahl by
Joshua Maxwell of Turrell, Hall and Associates, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter
described as:
Lot 11, Isles of Capri No. 1, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book
No. 3, Page 41, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida
Folio No. 52340400004
Wahl Boat Dock Ext \ BDE- PL2011 -1409
Rev. 01/05/12 1 of 2
be and the same is hereby approved for a 34.6 foot extension of a boat dock over the maximum
20 foot limit to allow for a 54.6 foot boat dock facility in the RSF -4 zoning district wherein said
property is located, subject to the following conditions:
1. All docks, or mooring pilings, whichever protrude the greater into the water, regardless of
length shall have reflectors and house numbers four (4) inches minimum size installed at the
outermost end on both sides, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Completion.
2. At least one (1) "Manatee Area" sign must be posted in a conspicuous manner as close as
possible to the furthest protrusion of the dock into the waterway, prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Completion.
3. Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection shall be presented to Collier County prior to issuance of
a building permit.
4. All prohibited exotic species, as such term may now or hereinafter be established in the
LDC, must be removed from the subject property prior to the issuance of the required Certificate
of Completion and the property must be maintained free from all prohibited exotic species in
perpetuity.
5. Subject to the Collier County Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) approving petition VA-
P1,20110001410.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this
Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this day of , 2012.
ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator,
Growth Management/Planning &
Regulation Division
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
DRAFT
Steven T. Williams
Assistant County Attorney
Mark P. Strain, Chairman
Wahl Boat Dock Ext \ BDE- PL2011 -1409
Rev. 01/05/12 2 of
n