Loading...
BCC Minutes 03/24/1992 R Naples, Florida, March 24, 1992 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in ~nd for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, mst on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SlSSION in Building "F" of the Government Comp/ex, East Naples, Florida, with the fo/lowing members present: CHAIRMAN: Michael J. Volpe VICE-CHAIRMAN: Richard S. Shanahan Burr L. Saunders Max A. Hesse, Jr. Patricia A. Goodnight ALSO PRESENT: James Co Giles, Clerk; John Yonkoaky, Finance Director; Annette Guevin, Kathy Meyers and Debby Yarris0 Deputy Clerks; Nail Dorrill. County Manager; Jennifer Pike. Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Dave Weigel. Brenda Wilson, Richard Yovanovich and Ramiro Manalich, Assistant County Attorneys~ George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Frank Brutt, Community Development Services Administrator; Jay Reardon, Emergency Services Administrator; Tom Olliff, Public Services Administrator; Fred Bloetecher, Assistant Utilities Administrator; Mike NcNees. Budget Director; Tom Conrecode. Office of Capital Projects Director; Ken Pineau, Emergency Management Director; Bob Blanchard, Growth Planning Director; Murdo Smith, Parks & Recreation Director; Fred Reischl, Environmental Specialist; Chahran Badamtchian, Eric Young, Bob Mu/here and Wayne Arnold, Planners; Sue Fi/son, Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Byron Tomlinson, Sheriff's Office. Page March 24, 1992 Coamiesioner Shanahan ~oved, seconded by Coamteeloner Ha~ee and 5/0, that the agenda be approved with the following Discussion by Chairman of transportation impact fee ordinance public hearing scheduled for Wednesday, March 25, 1992 - 5:05 P.M. - Added. Item #8D2 - Discussion of North Naples Utilities Issues - Continued to 3/31/91 at 1:00 P.M. (Mutual agreement of all parties.) Item #16A5 - Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of "Bermuda Greene, Tract F" - Continued indefini- tely. (Requested by Staff.) Item #16E2 - Recommendation to waive the formal bid process and authorize the purchase of telecommunications equipment and related services from A.T.&T. for calendar year 1992 - Continued to 3/31/92. (Requested by Staff.) Item #16H4 - Recommendation to award a contract for BAd No. 92-1857, dune vegetation and parking lot landscaping at Barefoot-Bonita Beach Park - Moved to #8H4. (Requested by Staff.) Se Item #16L1 - Recommendation to approve negotiated contracts under RFP 91-1762 for the procurement of court-appointed legal services - Moved to #gF. (Requested by Board of County Commissioners.) Xram#SI APPROVED AND/OR ADOPTED The ~otlon for approval of the Consent Agenda ie noted under Item DX$CUBSXON BY CHAIRMAN OF TRANBPORTATION iMPACT FEE ORDXILM~CE PUBLIC HIARX]~ 8CH~DULKD FOR WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25, 1992 - 5:05 P.M. - SECOND PUB~XC HIARING TO BE RESCKKDULED TO APRIL 15, ~992, AT 5:05 P.M.; CCPC DI'RIGTED TO PROVIDE R~COJOiKNDATION AT THEIR APRIL 9, 1992, PUBLIC Commissioner Volpe stated the second public hearing to consider adoption of the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance is scheduled for March 25th. He noted he has been advised by the County Attorney that the ULDC Indicates the Board must have a recommendation from the Page 2 March 24, 1992 Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) before the Board takes final action on that amendment. He suggested the second public hearing be rsscheduled as soon as possible after the CCPC holds its public hearing, which is scheduled for April 9th. He mentioned the Board, however, must convene the March 25th meeting in order to continue the public hearing. It was the consensus that the second public hearing to consider adoption of the Transportation Impact Fee Ordinance be rescheduled to April 16, 1992, at 5:05 P.M. Commissioner Saundere moved, seconded by Co-~leeloner Shanahan and carried unanimously, to direct the CCPC to conclude their recommen- ~ltlo~ regarding the Transportation Impmct Fee Ordlnlnce at their April 9, lgg2, meeting. ~ gEN~ICI ANA~S - FR~SENTED ¢outssionsr Goodntght congratulated the following Collier County employes and presented his service award: Sal Gardino, Mediator/Arbitration - 5 years ess O~tuioner Goodnight left the ~eettng at this tl~e ~IDG~T ~ 92-181 AND 92-188 THROUGH 92-189 - ADOPTED AND B~YD~HT ~ 92-191 CONTINUED TO 3/31/92 Commissioner Volpe questioned Budget Amendment 92-191, which Indi- cates the need for $6,000 for a handicap parking survey for the Government complex. County Manager Dorrill suggested the Board continue that Item for one week, and Staff will provide the Board with an Itemization of the ?; 'costs involved. ~tmetoner Shanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner 8aundere and C&t~A'led 4/0 (Co~iesioner Goodnlght out), to continue Budget Amendment 92-191 to the meeting of March 31, 1992. C,~mlsetoner Sh~n~hen ~ove~, seconded by Commissioner maunders and Pa9~ 3 Max-ch 24, 1.992 csx-tie4 4/0 (Co.~ismioner ~oodnight out), that Budget A~end~ents 92-181 ~ 92-188 t~gh 92-189 ~ adoptS. Xt~ ~B T~TXO~ OF CO~S ~ ~5 Finance Director Yonkosky recalled that Commissioner Volpe requested an update on the status of the Substantial Deviation of Berkshire Lakes, which was approved by the Board on June ll, 1991. Ken Pineau, Emergency Management Director, reported after meeting with representatives of Berkshire Lakes and Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, inc., the situation has yet to be resolved. He said several mitigation measures have been discussed in lieu of constructing a et$rm shelter, including back-up generators and a new product called armor coat, which is a plastic film over windows that gives tremendous protection for glass in storm conditions. He said although he receives calls from the developer on an almost weekly basis, he is having difficulty working with the School District to mitigate the development. Finance Director Yonkosky mentioned that the Board directed that Unit ? of the development not be platted and recorded until this Issue ia resolved, therefore, the Board does have a substantial hold over the developer. Co~mieeioner Volpe suggested this item be included on the agenda of the meeting to take place with the School Board scheduled for the near future. ese Oo~m/~toner ~oodnt~ht returned to the ~ting at this tl~e ese ~ ~)~k,ll~X,,Jk~ INFORMATION - P~OVXDED Finance Director Yonkosk¥ presented five-month budget to actual financial reports for the Countywide General Funds, revenues on impact fees, major Development Services charges, local gas taxes, major intergovernmental revenues and a schedule of pooled cash by fund ae of February 29th. He pointed out that in the budget to actual report, it March 24, 1992 appears the County is slightly ahead of revenues, specifically in some ?. of the impact fees. II~;~IT&T~G~' OF 19~1 COLLIER COUNTY COI~:'R~H~I'V~ AII*JIU&L FIN&~ICI&L Finance Director Yonkosky explained the County Financial Statements are prepared each year by the Finance Department and are than reviewed by external auditors who provide their opinion. He stated the audit of the 1991 Collier County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was completed in accordance with State Statutes, and several other reports that were processed at the same time have been completed and will be transmitted to various agencies after this meeting. He advised the Annual Financial Report, in its long form, will be transmitted to the State to allow the County to continue par- tlctpattng In revenue sharing Finance Director Yonkosky referred to two sets of financial state- ments provided to the Board. He said the large book ts a Statutorlally prescribed book required to be presented to the Board and the Attorney General for the State of Florida, and contains the aa~e information as the smaller report, known as the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). He indicated it also contains a complete met of financial statements for each of the Constitutional Officers as well as an Auditor General Section. He commented the management letter is prepared by the auditor concerning any legal compliance Items they came across during the audit and any Internal control concerns they felt significant enough to address to the Board Of County Commissioners. He pointed out each of the Individual audits of the Constitutional Officers contains a similar management letter and the respective comments or rebuttals from the Constitutional Officers. Phyllis Jones, a partner with Coopers & Lybrand, advised it is the opinion of her firm that the statements within the financial report do : reflect the financial position of Collier County as of September 30, Page 5 March 14, 1992 1991. She added they did not find any material weaknesses In the -.grants they reviewed. Commissioner Volpe mentioned Coopers & Lybrand did a similar audit for 1990 and made certain recommendations. He asked If those recom- mendations were followed by County Staff? Ms. Jones replied the majority of a number of different comments made last year were resolved during the current year. She said three or four areas are being addressed now by the County, and are entitled "Prior Year Comments ~htch Continue to Apply" In the current year management letter. Finance Director Yonkosky summarized the financial statements, pointing out key areas for the Board's Information. Commissioner Shanahan communiCated it Is essential to track deve- loper pledges. Finance Director Yonkosk¥ agreed, stating when Transportation Services Administrator Archibald presented his strategic plan, he Identified approximately $§-mlllton In developer commitments. Commissioner Volpe thanked Finance Director Yonkosk¥ on behalf of " the Board for a Job well done. I" : Co~miuton~r ~u moved, seconded by Coutsstoner Sh~m~h~n ~nd '~ o~rl~d v~nlmousl¥, to accept the 1991 Collier County Comprehensive &nnu~l II~nclal Report. ~ :' IXllI~XOII 0F B~DGETARY rollD$ fOR ~ X)Of0KALEX URGEFr CARE CLII~I¢ AIFD *' ~IUTTLI TRAJlBPORTATXOR PROGRAM I~R SXXMOHTHS - BIIDGKT AM~ItI~EKIFT XI !";: THI~UIIT OF $150,000 APPROVED County Manager Dorrtll reported Naples Community Hospital has indicated there will be an announcement for plans to develop a satellite hospital facility in Immokalee, with a ground-breaking ceremony within 60 days. Tom Brown, representing Naples Community Hospital, concurred that the hospital has plans to develop a health care facility in lmmokalee; however, they are not In a position to announce a timetable for Page 6 Harch 24, ~992 construction. He said even if the project commenced in 60 days, the facility would not be ready for another year. Commissioner Volpe questioned if the possibility of utilizing the Tr~nsportation Disadvantaged Program for the shuttle services has been explored? Jay Reardon, Emergency Services Director, replied he has worked · very closely with Jeff Perry in the Transportation Department regarding that possibility. He indicated Mr. Perry is aware that whe- never he is ready to undertake that task, Emergency Services is ready to coordinate such an endeavor. He mentioned one of the problems is .',. the people being transported in assoc~ation with the Immokalee Urgent f . Care Clinic are in a medically sensitive position. Commissioner Saunders mentioned a concern in trying to merge the 4 two programs is that people being transported in association with the .~ Urgent Care Clinic may not qualify under the Transportation '- DAsadvant aged Program. Mr. Reardon indicated he will attempt to get that information before the end of this discussion. He requested if this item is approved, that the Board include in the motion, approval to renew the existing agreement for an additional six months under the current terms and conditions, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. CommLosioner Volpe inquired what portion of the monies expended to date are for the transportation element and what portion pays the doctors? Mr. Reardon replied the annual cost for a physician, an R.N. and a translator aide from Naples Community Hospital through Collier Health Services, Inc. (CHSI) is approximately $224,000 per year. He said the shuttle cost is approximately $40,000 annually. He said insurance coots are variable, approximately $15,600 ie paid to CHSI as reimbur- sement for pharmaceuticals, and the balance is miscellaneous reimbur- sements that are billed monthly back to CHSI for operational overhead. Dr. Robert MacDuffee, representing Collier County Medical Society, Page 7 .March 24, ~992 .'.~&s~ured the Board that the committee on the Immokalee Center fully 'supports the extension of the current agreement. Maria Marquez, member of CURE, thanked the Board for its support for the past two years. She advised from April, 1990, and September, 1991, over 7,900 have been treated by the Urgent Care Clinic, and ~.~ during the same period of time, 940 persons have used the tranepor- ration program. She asked for the Board's continued financial support for the program. She provided the Board with a letter from Dr. i" Malanio Vlllaroea also urging the Board to continue its support. Commissioner Volpe asked if Dr. Polkowskl, the Public Health Unit Director, provides any staffing tn the Immokalee area? County Manager Dorrill answered Dr. Polkowskt provides staffing involving both the WIC Program and venereal disease clinic programs, but no other clinical care in Immokalee. Commissioner Volpe suggested the opportunity be explored in the progTam priority budgeting process that the Public Health Unit provide medical support to the Urgent Care Clinic in Immokalee. He also ~uggested the medical community may be willing to donate services. Co.missioner Goodnight communicated HRS h%s never been involved in emergency care, only preventive programs. Roger Evans with the Collier Public Health Unit, explained their role ia to provide preventive health care, which is very different from the emergency room care approach. He said they deal with non- acute, ambulatory, doctor office type service in a very limited faci- lity, and without a physician. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Evans stated they work very closely with Collier Health Services in terms of service delivery in I~okalee. George Keller, President of the Collier County Civic Federation, asked what are the total expenditures to operate the facility and what revenues are received from patients? Mr. Reardon explained Collier County receives $1,000 credit per month billing from CHSI directly related to pharmaceuticals because of Page 8 March 24, 1992 ./the 87.50 fee per patient treated. Ne said it is extremely difficult ~.for CHSI to track the amount of dollars generated from paying custo- mers because of the tremendous amount of patients coming in for all the available services. He reported they also work on a eliding fee scale, but the bulk of patients do not have the ability to pay, and they rely on federal and State grants to treat those in need. Mr. Keller emphasized that there should be some way to collect a small amount of money from the people served by the Immokalee Urgent Care Clinic. Commissioner Goodnight asked Mr. Keller to keep in mind that many of those benefiting from the Clinic make less than $3,000 per year with 6-8 people in the family. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Brown stated the primary focus of the hospital is acute care. He stated Naples Community is getting involved in urgent care, which is normally provided by the private sector, more slowly. He said the hospital is meeting the acute care needs of Immokalee at the present time by transporting patients to the hospital. Commissioner Saunders commented this program also provides a second level of transportation to those who need treatment imme- diately but do not require an ambulance, which would be far more costly. Commissioner Volpe inquired if the hospital is providing acute ![:'-care and the County ie providing urgent care, what is the primary focus of CHSI? County Manager Dorrill advised the basic medical clinic for sick people tn Immokales is CHSI. Mr. Reardon concurred, adding CHSI performs much of the preven- tative, b~ appointment type treatment while the Urgent Care Clinic cares for the wa/k-in emergent patients. ~ee~Aeele~e~ ~anahan ~oved, ~econded by Co--tsaloner Saunders, to ~ ~lttem~l funding from the General Fun~ Reee~ by m t~a~l~t M~rch 24, 1992 ~t in the mmount of $150,000 for the continued operation of the lmmolrmlme Ur~wnt Care Center for six months. In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Reardon stated those riding the Disadvantaged shuttle must be preregtstered before they c~n access the program. He said they must also meet certain economt- cai disadvantaged ~utdeltnes, be in excess of 65-60 years of age, suffer mental or physical handicap or be children at risk according to State law. He indicated Mr. Perry has stated that does not mean the County would be prohibited from using the shuttle, but it would require a separate contract utilizing County funds, because State funds may not be used for clients accessing the shuttle between Isuaokalee and Naples. He reported he and Mr. Perry will meet again to further investigate that alternative. Commissioner Volpe commented the Board has made a commitment to this program, and there ts an Identifiable need not currently being mst. He said he is concerned, however, with whether exietlng resour- ces might be refocused on this urgent care as opposed to where some of the current dollars are being spent. He said there is a limited ~.' ~mount of money available which must be prioritized. He mentioned a profile of those being served at the Clinic ts not available, and i although he understands the issue as it relates to the people within ~, the II. Ok&lee community, the same issue exists tn East Naples and ., Golden Oate. lie Indicated the County te essentially providing free health care to at least 8,000 people who may or may not be residents of the community. He asked the Board to consider continuing the funding for 30-60 days in order to explore alternatives and begin looking at the long term solution. Co.missioner Saundera suggested the funding be approved for six aonths. He said if an alternative is found through discussions with the private sector, the Board can change direction. Commissioner Volpe stated he will work diligently in discussions with the Collier Medical Society and others to find additional funding alternatives. Page 10 March 24, 1992 Mr. Re~rdon reminded the Bosrd for the need to extend the agreement under current terms and conditions with CHSI, and authority for the Chairman to sign the agreement. Page 11 March 24, 1992 10~60 &.N, - Raconv~ned: 11:05 A.N. at which ti# Clark Me~ra replaced Deputy Clark ~uevln *** RP~OLI]TZON 92-193 RE I~TITION $T-92-2, BARRY AND THEI~SA FOOTS ~ A S~CI~ ~~ D~LO~ PK~ZT TO ~L~ ~ ~~ OF A ~BIL~ H~ ~ ACCKSSORY S~UC~S OR LOT 7, ~A~ IS~ ~B[LK H~51~5 (~C0~KD} - ~D S~CT TO ~~'S A~ ~ ST~ DI~C~D TO ~S~ ~V~ OF uSU D~X~ON Legal notice having been published In the Naples Daily News on March 8, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Fred Retechl, Environmental Specialist with Project Review Services, explained that the Petitioner wants to place a mobile home and several accessory structures on a lot in the Plantation Island %lnrecorded subdivision, which is within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. Mr. Relschl reviewed that the Collier County Land Development Code and the Florida Administrative Code state that within the Big Cypress, no mangrove trees shall be destroyed or other- wise altered, and that the subject lot does contain several mangrove trees, so that any Development Order issued by Collier County may be appealed by the Department of Community Affairs (DCA). He advised the Board that DCA has stated, after speaking with their general counsel and barring any new information, a building permit would not be appealed. He further advised the Board that the Environmental Advieor~ Board and the Collier County Planning Commission recommended approval of Petition ST-92-2. In response to Commissioner Hesse, Mr. Retschl discussed that there are other mobile homes In this area. He said certain lots were fi/led about 30 years ago, and certain other lots were never filled. Regarding the subject lot, he noted that It Is partially filled. Commissioner Saunders commented when talking In terms of essen- tially no net loss of wetlands in the Comprehensive Plan, it does not mean that one cannot destroy wetlands In the process of developing a mobile home or some other project; it means those destroyed must be 25 Page 12 March 24, 1992 replaced. He presumed that the same principal would apply regarding mangroves, noting there is a policy about limiting the destruction of mangroves, and any mitigation should conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Reischl reported that the Department of Environmental Reglzlation (DER) has required mitigation for the loss of mangroves. Commissioner Goodnight reiterated that currently, Plantation Island is part of the ST area, and residents cannot build anything. She explained that when the property owners purchased their lots, they did not contain mangroves which are now intruding into their mobile home lots. She sympathized with the property owners, because they cannot add a porch or replace a trailer unless they come before the Hoard. Harold Hall, a resident of Plantation Island and a member of the Board of Directors for Plantation Island Property Owners Association, read a letter that he wrote to DER's Permitting Officer when the application was submitted one year ago. (Copy not provided to the Clerk to the Board.) He pointed out that he and his wife own the lot adjacent to the subject parcel, and encouraged the Board to grant approval of this petition. He proposed that Staff from the National Park, Fakahatchee Strand, Big Cypress, wildlife offices and other agencies would find Plantation Island an affordable housing area. He reported that Commissioner Goodnight addressed the last general meeting of the Board of Directors for Plantation Island Property Owners Association, and the Board subsequently voted unanimously to request that the Board of County Commissioners endorse and support the removal of Plantation Island from the Area of Critical State Concern. He related that in conversation with the Department of Natural Hesources (DNR), he was informed that Plantation Island was not on the ~ap used when designating that Area. He recalled that the Board of County Commissioners designated Plantation Island "Urban" when the Growth Management Plan was adopted. Commio.ioner Goodnight ex--alan_hat when thi. area was IJLU Page 13 March 24, 1992 i.i'desl~nated "Urban", she thought the ST dest~natton would bs removed as ~'W~ll. She requested that Staff investigate and determine how the 'Board can amend that designation. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Hall confirmed that Plantation Island contains 300 lots, of which over $0~ are developed. He estimated there are approximately 180 structures, aone of which are on two lots. ~mm/ml~r Goodnt~ht moved, ~con~d t~ Com~lsmlo~er ~ ~1~ ~t~ly, to close the ~bllc ~lng. ~ ~1~ ~l~ly, to ~ro~ P~tttlon ST-92-2 ~b~ect to Ntltto~r~s ~nt, th~rst~ ~Joptlng Resolution 92-115, and that Staff ~ d/rect~ to reme~ch re~al of the ST ~ml~tlon on i' Page 14 Narch 24, 1992 xtea mx Fred Bloetscher, Assistant Utilities Administrator reported that this resolution proposes to acquire certain easements by gift, purchase or condemnation, and ts tn conjunction with a water line pro- '' Jeer that to located on the east side of the canal alongside Livingston Road. He explained that the water line path was chosen because in this area there currently exists a right-of-way that the Co32nt~ lo utilizing and that, tn order to be continuous, four parcels have to be acquired. He perceived that acquisition of these parcels i , can be done without condemnation, but if that ts not possible, then authorization i8 needed to pursue condemnation. Mr. Bloetacher noted that there are two corrections to the resolu- tion from the County Attorney's office: a) On the second page of the resolution, line 8, there should be a reference to Chapter 153 of the F/or/da Statutes added; and b) under the signatory for the Chairman the fo/lowing phrase te to be added: Ex Officio of the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District. C~i~io~er Shanahanmoved, seconded by Cos~iaoloner Saunders and C~2TXe4[ ~n~ly, to ~pprove etaffta reco~e~datton to acquire the atlltt~ ~te by gift, purchase or condemnation, and thereby ~lopt ]teeel~tm ,~-X84/CWS 92-$ with ataff~e two recommended chan~e~. Page 15 " March 24, 1992 ~ ~TN Q~&LT~C QO&LZT~ SERVICES, INC. - A#~]~DED TO P~MZT I]ICL~I0~I OP TH~ aRS COT, LIaR C0ONT~ POBLIC HEALTN UNIT Michael McNees, Budget Director, explained that this Item ts an a~tendment to the County's existing contract with Qualtec Quality Services, Inc., who As the contract vendor for total quality manage- ment ~nd services to allow the Public Health Unit to adopt the total quality management program that was adopted for the Coun~ Manager's Agency. Mr. MeNses stated that the service cannot be provided directly through the County Manager's Agency because of licensing concerns that Qualtec has. He handed out copies of the ~mendment to the Board which was to be included tn the agenda package · nd apologized for the oversight. He noted that the County Attorney's office has reviewed this contract amendment and accepted it. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. McNees explained that this will benefit the County because it will enable the sharing of some of the training resources. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. McNees noted that this will not require any additional funding. In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. McNees confirmed that the $10,~00 expenses referred to in the Executive Summary will come from within the current budgeted contribution to the Health Unit. In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. McNees reviewed that as ~' part of the Strategic Planning Session, the dollars spent was docu- ~ented as well as the dollar savings to date and he added that he would provide another copy of this information by separate memo if the Board wished. Mr. McNees stated that staff has stated that they are making a lot of progress with their quallty efforts. Co,missioner Shanahan mentioned that he would lake to review the progress report and Mr. McNees agreed. Commissioner Volpe expressed concern over losing people already trained to the private sector. Mr. McNees responded that in the Page March 24, ~992 situation that has occurred, the coordinator has accepted a position ~lth another firm, and that farm will train the County's replacement, so they are fully funding the training effort. In summary he noted that the County will receive a fully trained coordinator and that this is a fair settlement. In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. McNeee reviewed that this company is Qualtec Quality Services, Inc., and are a fully owned sub- eidiary of Florida Power and Light. In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. McNees explained that the County has approximately 200 employees on active quality Improvement teams at various stages in the process. He said that in the next few months the fiscal Impact statement within an Executive Summary will be more complete than they have been tn the past as a direct result of a qllality improvement effort. Gilbert Er/lehman, residing at §980 Amherst Drive, questioned how lonfl the program has been in effect. Mr. McNess responded that an agreement with Qualtec was entered Into in midyear fiscal 1990, so it is well into the second year. Commissioner Volpe explained to Mr. Erltchman that this was discussed during the Strategic Planning Session. Mr. McNees reiterated that he would be happy to provide a copy of the information ~,.'provided during this session. ~ssio~l~r Hasal ~oved, seconded by Conissionar Shanahan an~ carrie~ unanimously, to approve the amendment to the existing contract w~th ~A~lteC. In response to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. MeNses speculated that the ~-contract with Qualtec has approximately one year remaining, out of the total three years. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. McNees noted that this will take the Public Health Department through the balance of the Countyts !~. contract with Qualtec, as opposed to ~ust through the end of the fiscal year. Page 17 March 24, 1992 ~AL A~ FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NITIK NILS0N, MILLER, BA~N~01r& P~EE, IN~., TO PROVIDE RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESE~TATION D~RING C~O~ ON 1~. FO~ THE NAPLES PRODUCTION PARE ~ A~I(~NT DISTRICT - APPROVED, COUNTY MANAGER TO ASSESS CO~T 0~ CKEATI]I~ AN IN-NOU~E CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AND Tom Conrecode, Director oS the Office of Capital Projects Management, reported that this item is a recommendation to approve a Supplemental Agreement with Wi/son, Miller, Barton and Peek, Inc., for professional services, namely a project engineer to enable provision of resident services during construction of the improvements of the Naples Production Park. He reviewed that this was a part of the ten- tative assessment rolls. He noted that the cost for this is $221,400, and that this is a lower price than was included in the assessment roils, which was $2?5,000, or a 20~ savings. In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Conrecode noted that this cost could be substantially less if the project is finished sooner. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conrecode expressed that th~s Supplemental Agreement is a necessity because the rights of the people in the district will be protected, and the supervision is needed to ensure that the work is completed. Commissioner Volpe expressed his concern with retaining outside consultants due to a lack of existing staff. Commissioner Volpe further commented that this was supposed to be part of the original assessment, however he noted that this assessment has increased substantially over and over again since the original project was conceived in 1986, and an almost §?~ increase over what the original contract was for the design work. Mr. Conrecode related that the prior project engineer is no longer working and in order to protect the county's rights and the rights of the property owners, these professional services are necessary. County Manager Dorrtll concurred with Mr. Conrecode and added that this is a routine phase, and as a rule, the County has always retained March 24, 1992 ['~L."&' con~altant to certify and review daily the field work during construction; failing to do eo would result in essentially no one ~Inepecttng or reviewing the contractor's work and approving it for payment. Re noted that historically and philosophically Collier ,.~ Collnty has never had Its own tn-house department to handle this, and currently the design, construction management, and field-type super- vision work Is contracted. Co.missioner Volpe commented that within the last month he has reviewed at least three agreements like this and suggested that maybe It would be more economical to hire staff to handle this phase of construction. County Manager Dorrill stipulated that he will provide the Board a cost analysis on creating an tn-house construction manage- lent field supervision department. Commissioner Volpe questioned if this Agreement is part of the r'oadwork or If It is for the utilities work. Mr. Conrecode confirmed that It includes al/ the utilities work, the roadwork, the drainage, the pusp stations, and all the electrical work. In response to Commissioner Volpe's Inquiry If the Utilities Staff could not do some of this work, County Manager Dorrtll replied negatt- rely, noting that the Utility Administration and engineering staff consists of two people - Mike Arnold and Fred Bloetscher. In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Conrecode pointed out that this will provide a staff of three, in addition to the County staff of two to be on site every single day. Mr. Conrecode noted additionally that this is similar to the progra~ currently In progress In the Pine Ridge Industrial Park and has worked exceptionally well, but It requires a tremendous amount of coordinmtlon. Secondly, he pointed out that after ? years on this project, construction ts scheduled to begin in a few days. Commissioner Saundera speculated that the on-site engineering review of a project ts probably one of the most important aspects of the project. He questioned the County's degree of liability, should the County develop an In-house department. Page 19 March 24, 1992 County Attorney Cuyler responded, stating that it would place the }% County in a more difficult position with regard to putting a case together. County Attorney Cuyler advised that outside engineers carry their own inattrance and are responsible to the County for their m/stakes. . He suggested that $200,000 can be spent very quickly in a lawsuit. County Attorney Cu¥1er cited that it would be wise to have periodic ' visits to the site by qualified professionals. Commissioner Saunders requested that County Attorney Cuyler pro- vide his own Input with County Manager Dorrill as he develops the cost analysts. Co.missioner Saunders stipulated that the rationale for the on- site inspections ts contained in the Considerations paragraph of the ~xecutIve Summary which states: 'Such provision enables more extensive representation at the pro- Ject site during the construction phase through more extensive on-site observations of the work tn progress and field checks of ~atertals and equipment by the resident project representative and assistants to provide further protection for the owner against defects and deficiencies in the work." Commissioner Saunders further expressed that the Justification for the Professional Services is to ensure that the project work is done [. in accordance with the plans' specifications. ~,. County Manager Dorrlll suggested that the Board approve the Agreement and retain Wilson, Miller to provide this service, and Mr. Dorrill will provide a cost analysis within three weeks. He asked the Board to keep in mind that office space and clerical support would also have to be budgeted, along with any necessary vehicles. ,.. County Manager DorrIll summarized that the Board Is entitled to sea what the comparison would be, and that this may be one of those inet&ness where the Board decides they would rather create additional · per~anent employees rather than prtvatlze all that work Individually. /'He pointed out that in this case, construction is about to begin, and should not be delayed. In response to Commissioner Shanahan, Mr. Conrecode verified that Page 20 March 24, 1992 these mervtces were proposed in the original contract. County Manager Dorrill mentioned that typically the County nego- tiates fees as they go, and this ts not something that was not anti- !. Cipated. Commissioner Shanahan commented that if there is an area that the Board ie severely criticized on with regards to consultant fees he would want to avoid spending unnecessary money if the work could be done in-house. Commissioner Volpe questioned if this ts a departure from the County's standard procedures of periodic review by consulting engi- nests. Mr. Conrecode discussed that this is not a departure. County Manager Dorrill stated it ts not a departure but rather a typical phase of service for inspection during the commencement of construction. John Yonkosky, Finance Director, explained that most of the contracts have a periodic review and they do not retain a full-time resident engineer. He further noted that, as Mr. Conrecode pointed out, the project on Pine Ridge does and he is recommending this ser- vice for this project as well. Commissioner Volpe questioned again, whether this Is a departure from the county standard procedures of periodic review by consulting engineers. County Manager Dorrtll responded negatively, noting that because the Naples and Pine Ridge Industrial Park Projects are not typical built projects. Gilbert Erllchman, residing at 5980 Amherst Drive, commented that the purpose of this Agreement is to enable more extensive represen- tation at the project site, and ensure the County against a lawsuit. He questioned what the County ts getting with the $221,400, since according to the second paragraph in Exhibit A, it states that if resident engineering services are provided, the engineer shall endeavor to provide additional protection to the owner, but ts not . responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures or for safety precautions or programs, or for contractor's Page March 24, 1992 :failure to perform the construction work in accordance with the documents. County Manager Dorrtl! responded that this is fairly standard, and ~ the means and methods of construction are outside the purview of both . ~ 'the owner as well as the architect or the engineer. He explained that in this case, the reason for having a resident engineer is to have ~..... dally continuous inspection of the work that is being done. Mr. Erlichman questioned what good the inspection is if the ' .engineer is not responsible for it. County Manager Dorrlll verified that he is responsible for the inspection He explained that the way the project is physically constructed and the safety procedures that ~.~. are used during the construction are the sole obligation of the i/:. genera/ contractor, and are required and included in his contract with the owner. · County Attorney Cuyler advised that the engineer is a/ways going to be responsible for any negligence on the part of the engineer; if !.i.. the contractor fails to carry out according to the contract, the "' engineer is not going to accept that responsibility. County Attorney Cuyler stipulated that the engineer does have a responsibility to report to the County, and they have to maintain normal negligence standards, and report any results of their inspections i.e. if the 'k~L. contractor is not complying with contract documents, but they are not ~: accepting the liability for that failure on the part of the contrac- County Manager Dorrlll added that he physically has the ability to .atop work on the project or to refuse payment to the contractor, but ~...he is not Individually responsible for the way that it ts built; he ts responsible for the inspection In the course of construction and to % ; report his findings. Coulsstoner Volpe aired that he is the liaison to make sure the !:contractor ts doing what the contract provides for. County Attorney Ouyler concurred and noted that when these people are on site, the i~ contractor will in ~ost cases pay closer attention to their work. Page 22 Hatch 24, 1992 Mr. Erltchuan divulged that he possesses a thirteen page document 'which lists all the open consultant contracts, totaling 31 mi/lion dollars (Copy not provided to the Clerk to the Board}. County Manager Dorrlll advised Mr. Erlichman that he has not omen this document that Mr. Yonkosky's office has prepared. He stressed that there is currently a freeze on hiring for 80 employee positions, that Transportation Services has almost 20~ fewer employees than a year ago. He ventured that the ~wo largest consulting contracts Involve the construction of the Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment Plant and the expansion or construction of several sewage treatment plants. Commissioner Saunders recognized that government ts not always capable of doing thing8 as cheaply and efficiently as private ~.~ enterprise. He requested a copy of the document that Mr. Erlichman referred to concerning the consultant contracts. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Conrecode confirmed that 'the time frame for construction of this project is twelve months. ~ ~ ~W ~r ~rrtll to pr~e a coot al~ls, to ~ ~ ~~ Co~tnctt~ ~nt Field N~~t. Cowry N~ager Dorrlll confirmed thak the analysis would be co~le~ed within three weeks. Co~ssloner Volpe asked why Johnson Engineering has an hourly ~.. 'rate of $90 ~ hour and WI/son, M~ller is $60 an hour. County Manager Dorrtll explained that there are differences because there are different levels of engineers. /l~i~r S~ ~nded hie ~otion to lncludm a~r~ml of ~e~T b~t a~end~ente. Co. Isotoner Rases ~econded the ~, ~nd the ~otton carried unanimously. M~'ch 24, Xgg2 ~FI')ZI,I~T)R) OF C~3~I'&IN D~BT OUT3TAIgDIN(I UNDER PLAX OF DISSOLUTION NITH ~ TO P~LICAI BAY INFROV'~f~IIT DISTRICT - STAFF DIReCTeD TO CO-'N,%I~t~(I~, I~'UD~IITIAL BACH~, M~,RILL LYNCH ~ #ILLIAN R. HUF~ Marc Samet, County Financial Advisor, reported that last fall after preparation of the Collier County Water-Sewer District Series 1991 Issue, he began considering future improvements, outstanding a~reements, and changes that would be forthcoming and would not impact the County's Water-Sewer District. He said at that time he began receiving some refunding ideas on certain outstanding Indebtedness at Pelican Bay Improvement District, which the County had assumed under the Plan of Dissolution. He advised that the Finance Committee la requesting approval by the Board to proceed with development of a plan of refinancing of the Pelican Bay Improvement Debt that Is outstanding and asstuaed by the County under the Plan of Dissolution; more specifi- c&lly, the Committee wants to combine refunding of the Series 1979 Qeneral Obligation Revenue Bonds of Pelican Bay with the 1989 General Obligation Revenue Refunding Issue for the purpose of transferring these obligations which are now a general fund responsibility to the water sewer district Itself. He noted this would be in conformance ~tth the instructions of the Plan of Dissolution adopted by the Commission. He expressed that at the same time, consistent with Chapter 125 of the Florida Statutes, the Committee ts anxious to con- vey title of the facilities that were transferred to the County as ~ccessor to PBID, or convey title Jointly to the Water-Sewer District In the County. He referred to the Executive Summary and noted that the County has an agreement dated December 11, 1990 with the developer of Pelican Bay that provides for the lnterconnectIon of the PBID N&etewater System with the regional system of the County. He noted that within this agreement it provides for reimbursement in the form of future credits against connection charges In Pelican Bay but that this is subordinate to the Indebtedness of Pelican Bay Improvement Page 24 March 24, [992 ~TDJltrtct, so if the outstanding indebtedness of Pelican Bay that the · 'County assumed when tt dissolved Pelican Bay ts refunded, certain pro- ~ · visions could enable either the County or the developer to accelerate the ~ount the developer is entitled to be reimbursed. He stressed that he wants to clarify the Intent of the developer and any Impact on .f: . rates if that reimbursement were to be a responsibility to either the bond proceeds, or in fact, it continues to be connection charge cra- In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Samet reported that it is a issue that has impact on a financing issue, and County Attorney 'il .Cuyler should review it. Mr. Samet reviewed that the last part of the recommendation in the Executive Summary deals with the Finance Committee's concern about the v . selection of the bankers, from the five that were previously approved · by the Board. He reported that only one of the five submitted written proposals, and that the Finance Committee is requesting authorization to proceed with the development of a financing plan and a recommen- '~. dation from the selection of bankers. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Hr. Samet confirmed that his ' preltmtnar~ analysts of the refinancing Indicates that the effect of the refinancing will not increase the annual debt service on these obligations, and that the Plan of Dissolution specifically states that the debt obligation should be refunded at the first opportunity where there are economic benefits to do so, and that there is an economic benefit to pursuing this as soon as possible. In response to Co~u~lastoner Volpe, Mr, Samet explained that under the reimbursement agreement the developer (Westinghouse) is going to p~It up his own money on an interest-free loan basis with reimbursement through credits or connection fees In that area. He expressed concern that if the debt Is subordinate to the original Pelican Bay I~provement Debt, which the County has assumed, and this debt Is refunded, the developer will have the opportunity to demand accelera- tion of that amount which is owed him. He advised Commissioner Volpe Page 25 March 24, 1992 that he Is in the process of discussion with the developer. Hs further commented that if the developer has the right to accelerate the debt, he wants to know if indeed that is his intention and if so then negotiations will have to be undertaken and alternatives will have to be sought, as well as researching the Impact on rates. Mr. Samet reiterated that one of the five Investment banking firms has ~ubmitted ideas on both the refunding of Pelican Bay and Capita/ Improvement Refunding issues, which ts Smith Barney, noting that they have come forth consistently with Ideas a~d written proposals. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Samet explained that his concern, which led to looking at the refundings, was not so much eco- noalc, but legal considerations, in that the bond holders of ths ori- ginal Pelican Bay Improvement District debt no longer have a general obligation of the District, because the District has since been dissolved. He summarized that in terms of the actual percent of the present v~lue savings, a 4~ present value savings was actually achieved. He recommended that as long as there are no dtseavings, the refund issue should be allowed to proceed. Ruse Mudge, residing tn Pelican Bay at 16 Las Brisas Way stated that ~en the water management assessment bonds and the water/sewer bonds are refinanced the County will be opening the way for Westinghouse to demand accelerated payment of the $1.1 million dollar agreement. He questioned where this money will come from. Mr Samet reiterated that this will be considered when evaluating the restruc- turing of the debt. ~ ~f to p=~ with the ~lysls of t~ r~l~, t~t ~1~ t~lr ~teml~tlon to the ~ard concerning t~ ~tng of Oo~tsslonsr Volp~ co~ented that he opposes this ~otton, par- tt~larly because he would ltk~ Mr. ~dpe's 9roup to have an oppor- Page 26 March 24, 1992 to comment on the selection of the lead underwriter. !:.. Couissionar Shanahan requested that the Pelican Bay Advisory Board participate in the development of the financial plan with Marc Samet and the Financial Committee. ~A~r Saunders amended his motion to reflect that the lead ~b~k~x f~r the refu~dlng/rafinancing will be Smith Barne~; Alex Brown will be the co-manager and the selling group will con, let of the addi- fiscal fAr~ae of Prudential Bache, Wlllia~ R. ~uff and ~errlll Lynch, u well m~ staff being directed to proceed with the analysis of the r~, a~d when the refund/refinance ls~ae ts ready it will be h~t be~k to the Board. Co---ieatonsr ~asse seconded the amended ~otAe~, ~ch~.a~ed 4/1 (Comiaeloner Volpe opposed). ese ~~ 1:OO P.M. - Reconvened: 1:50 P.M. at which time ~Cle~k Farria replaced l~t~F Clerk ~ra ese Xte~ ~Og.~TX~ ~-188, lt~ P~TXTXO~V-91-18, CO~UNXTY D~VELOP~gT (~'~,TI~Y~I'X~ RKIXICTZON OF 38 PAlq]t'IJ~ SPACK~ FROM ~ RBqqYlISD~ FOR THE FA~RMAYS COIFDOMIIIUM&T EMERALD ~ - ~WIT~ STIPULATIONS AND FURSUAIFT TO ALTKRN&TIVK aAm Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on February 23, 1992, aa evidenced by Affidavit of Publication flied with '" the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Planner Badamtchian reminded the Board of County Commissioners thio Item was previously heard two weeks ago, and proceeded to sum- ~artze the intent of the Petition. i~. John Lee, representing the Petitioner, distributed handouts which ~tncluded a site plan, Exhibit "A" Identifying reserved parking loca- ..~'. tion, and Alternatives "A" and "B". He proceeded to explain that paving parking spaces at this time does not meet the goals of a more native site, with more native vegetation and landscaping, and the cramtion of more open space where feasible. Co~uaissioner Volpe expressed concern that there are no objective criteria qutdeltnee to deal with parking reservation agreements other than what is being proposed for this particular situation. Page 27 March 24, 1992 Following a brief discussion regarding the bond issuance, Bill Hoover stated the percentages used on Alternatives "A" and "B" were considered standard methodology on parking studies. County Attorney Cuyler interjected that the County has to have access to the bond due to a requirement of the Land Development Code. ~i~te~ew ~=~rs ~oved, ~econde~ b~ C~t~stoner ~se ~ ~ ~1F, to cl~ the ~bltc he.ring. ~~i~ ~rs ~ to a~r~ the r~c~ ~kt~ a Ixmd in eo~e for~be posted con. ring the total cost all of the sa ~ce., if the C~atnt~ ~soctatt~ Cslssia~ dlr~ts that so~ or all of t~ ~es f~ltz~ p~c~e fro. ~he Con~alnl~ As~clatton to request tim ]kmrd of County Co~mtsslonere to take ~uch action; that, pi-tom' to th~ expiration of the posted bond, there ~ust be notice to t~ C~z~io~iu A~octatton, In writing, with sufficient tim to allo~ · ~tta~ of ~ to discuss the lapsing of the bond; and, ~ddt- ~l~ ~ ~fflctent tl~ for a ~ttng of ~ for t~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~EI~t t~t the ~ ~ wall ~ re~ to t~ ~~ ~t~tt~ It t~ ~ of ~ 9es if not ~, ~ ~t~ ~ th~ ~o~ the ~tton. In reply to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Lee stated the agreement will be entered Into on behalf of the Fairways Condominium Association by the ~urrent officers of the Association. In response to Commissioner Volpe and following remarks by Community Development Services Administrator Brutt, County Attorney Cuyler stated the full parking requirement will always be there and is not limited to a 5 year period. He stated there will be an agreement Page 28 Hatch 24, 1992 brought for algnature that will incorporate these various things Into ~t as w~ll as everything required by the Land Development Code. ~ al! fo~ the qulmt~on, the motion c~rtld un~nlloull¥, ~ flOO~,~,,.- 8.3' Page 29 March 24, 1992 ~'. ~ ~ ~ ~XON O~X~ (~) 87-80 ON ~0~ AT ISLES Legal notice having been published In the Naples Dally News on March 8, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication flied with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Planner MUlhere summarized the intent of the Petition, pointing out that the Petitioner purchased his home with the bath facility having been constructed below flood elevation without benefit of a : t~uilding permit. He reported al/ the electrical outlets are above the flood elevation, however. Comm/s~loner H~sse moved, seconded by Comtaetoner Shanahan and ?~"' c~..-Tiedw~mntmously, to close the public hearing. g~m/s~toe~r ~se moved, seconded by Co~/esioner Shanahan ~nd carrlml~mt~o~slF, to approve Petition FDPO-92-1 with the sttpula- tto~ t~at the I~rtion of the house located beloe the flo~l el~tl~ shall not be used for living ~p~ce, thereby ~d~ptln~ Page 30 Hatch 24, [992 LOC&T~D &T Z~L~ OF ~T. TROI~t~ (PORT-&U-FRINC;) - ADOFT~D Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 8, 1992, ae evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Planner Young explained the intent of the request by Petitioner sd relayed etaffte recommendation for approval. C~T~~I¥, to close the public he~rtng. =~ ~t~ll, to a~r~ Ntttlon ~92-2, t~ ~pttng Page Hatch 24, 1992 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 8, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk. public hearing was opened. Planner Mulher~ explained briefly the purpose of the Petition. Dudley Goodlette, representing the Petitioner, commented that with more advanced knowledge of the problem, the Petitioner could have sub- , mitred the information to the City of Naples and had the SDP prior to the deadline. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Goodlette reported that Coastal Beverage, owner of the property to the north, has submitted a letter indicating their consent to the granting of this requested var~axlce. Planner Mulhere reported a neighboring property owner voiced a concern and requested that there be no air conditioning=nits placed on any property lines which abut residential properties, and the Petitioner has agreed to the request. Oomm~ootoner Seunder~ moved, seconded b~ Commissioner Shenmhmn and cazTLodunmn]]~u~ly, to close the Public hearing. Cogmdoo~oner Saunters moved, seconded by Commissioner Shine, hen and ~rTi~dunants~u~ly, to approve'Petition V-92-l, subject to attpul&- tton~ in~ll in the &armament sheet, thereby adopting Resolution Page 3 2 March 24, 1992 .?'~ ~0Jl 92-1~9, RE PFflTI0~ V-92-3, MOIITEGO MAIlS, IJ~. REQUESTING A Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 8, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Planner Arnold summarized the intent of the Petition and relayed staff's reco~mendation for denial of same on the grounds there is no land related hardship in this instance. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Planner Arnold stated that part of staff's stipulation, should this Petition be approved, is for enhancement of landscaping existing along Cypress Way and Palm View Drive to help buffer any aesthetic problem that the adjacent property owners ~a¥ have. Floyd Huitt, representing the Petitioner, distributed photographs which were not provided for the record. ee C4~mmlmetoner S~unders left the meeting at this time se Omumdmetouer Shmn&b~n moved, seconded by Commtmmtonar Hesse end CaXTAOd 4/0 (C~gmtmeAoner Snunders not prement), to clo~e the public e~ITM &/~ (G~mu/melonor S~ndero out), to apprm Petition V-92-3 u~b3oe* *o *bo stipulation met forth in the AgFeeu~nt Sheet ~ with the O/O eg~t~ul of the OCPC (Collier County Pl~ing ~ edopt~ug boolution 02-280. Page 33 March 24, 1992 0'-190, 1~ FETZTZON V-92-2, Itlt~ll~ ~ET REQUE~TZNG F~t~ZON OF AN ZNIKISTRZAL BUZLDZNQ ON LOTS 8 AND 6 O~II~[C~;~D ZNDU'~TI~AL VZLLAG~ SUBDZVZSZON - ADOPTED NITH Legal notice having been published tn the Naples Dally News on March 8, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Pub//cation filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Planner Young briefly outlined the details of the Petition. He reported the CCPC (Collier County Planning Commission) recommended approval subject to the stipulation that Mr. Lamendola or Mr. Ramsey meet with the County's Landscape Architect to pursue the possibility of landscaping that exceeds what ts required under Ordinance 82-2. Marlo La~endola verified he agreed to everything recommended by Joe Delate, Landscape Planner. tbs M~m~ at thio tim. e. OeemalooAee~ Shanahan~, seconded by Comnisoioner Saundero and ~ 4/0 (Oommio~ton~r Ooodnlght not present), to close the public O0amimtouer ~hanahan moved, seconded by Commissioner Saunders and c~Tlod 4/0 (Comado~ioner Qoodnight not present), to approve Petition V-~,-, with tho ~ipulationo which hove been recommended and wtth tho ~tion of tho CCPC (Collier County Planning Coumiaelon), thor~bymSoptingResolution 92-190. Page 34 March 24, 1992 ~CO~FFRACT FOR BID W0. 92-1857, ~ VEONTATION AND PA~EI~ L~T ~:~ '~. ~ ~ ~ 0Y $22,210.09 Tom Conrecode, Director of Office of Capital Projects Management, related that, due to the discovery that the lowest bidder ia not a licensed contractor, etaff~a recommendation ts to award the contract to McOovern Construction Corp. sss ~e~t~l~ (k~odnt~t returned to the O~e~l~etee~r I~inahan~, seconded b7 Cc~mlmmIcme~ II. IH and ~z, TM e/00 to eeeard Bid ~o. 92-1057 to NcGowlz-n Construction Corp. I:DIEAJ~ (%CON01,1XCALLT DXSLOCA'I'ZDN0~ ASSIETANC~ ACT Plt0~) FOR ~ENV~CE DELIVENY AREa #20 UNDER TH~ JOB PAIt'fl~t~N%P ACT AND R~NENAL OF AGREEMENT DESI~lqATINO TH~ SOUTHWEST FLORIDA PRIVATE II~STRY COUNCIL AS ORA~TEE - APPROVED County Attorney Cu~ler introduced John Tippins, with the Southwest Florida Private Industry Council. John Tlpptns explained the baslc ~ctlons o~ the local elected o~c~als ~s outlined ~n the 2xecutive S~r?. C~W ~ttorne~ ~ler stated that, page ~ ~s a Sl~ature P~ge For ~mplo~ent ~d Training Plan, and, thus, was not included ~n the ~cket received. Be ex. la,ned that the second doc~en~, ~o~d on pages ~ ~d 4 of the ~ecut~ve Sugary, [. the E~AA Agreeaent de.~ating the PIC aa the gr~d recipient. In ~eapon~e to Co~ae~oner Volpe, County Attorney ~yler con- ~ed that staff has reviewed the Plan ~d there are no Collier C~t~ fu~d~ ~nvolved ~ same. ~e stated the ~lan ha. Been fo~arded to the County Hanager's O~f~ce .ithout receipt o~ any adverse co~en~e regarding s~e. ~e~tfer P~ke, Assistant to the County Nanager, verified ~t was cona~dered a routine ~tea and, after approval b~ the County Attorney's Office, the Count~ Nanager's O~ce had no problem ~lth the .~tter Page 35 March 24, 1992 added to the agenda. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Tippins explained that the ~atn program deals with Job training and placement for economically disadvantaged people tn Collier County, with 196 persons being placed An Collier County last year. Mr. Tippins revealed the EDWAA Program addresses those on qlne~ploy~ent compensation with Jobs being unavailable in their area or people who lose their Jobs due to their employer going out of busi- ;,~:,ness.,.~. He related that, out of the 81 enrolled in Collier County last year, there were 37 placements. ~,:, ' & brief question and answer period followed regarding the purpose and fundtn~ of these programs. County Manager Dorrill explained this is the successor to the old :,: CKTA Program. ~$~ ~ ~, seconded b~ Commtmmto,~e~- ~dn$~ht ~ ~i~ 4/9 (~i~i~r S~ers ~t p~t), to ~ t~ ~ ~t ~ re~l of the A~t ~~t$~ t~ ~t~t Fl~i~ ~t~te l~t~ C~cil ~ the ~ta, with ~tsst~r Vol~ ~l~i~ ~ ~t~e ~d di~ctton of the ~. Page 36 Hatch 24, 1992 DI~T~-~T~ 1, :~, 3, 4 ~ 6 ON 1992 TAX BILLS AS NON-AD VALOltE~ ~ - ~tOVED This item was discussed in conjunction with Items #9B, #9C, and ~gD. County Attorney Cuyler reported the Agreements are identical with the exception of the various projects which are involved. Assistant County Attorney Yovanovich explained the Property Appraiser will give staff the information to prepare the assessment roll and the Tax Collector will collect all the assessments. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Attorney Yovanovtch confirmed the Board of County Commissioners will certify the assessment roll to · the Tax Collector. Coaisstoner Shanahan requested to meet with County Manager Dorrtll0 Tax Collector Carlton, and Property Appraiser Skinner, at which tine County Attorney Cuyler pointed out these Agreements have been signed by both the Tax Collector and Property Appraiser. c~a~texl 8/0, to approv~ the ~t lind South Naples Santt~t-y Sewer ~~ ~t for t~e County ~tar-~r District to rei~ the Prol~wt~~eer ~mt Tu Collector. Page 37 March 24, ~992 Jk~I:KBI~IrTFOR KDCLID AID LAKIT. AID AVEJIUKS ROADMAY ZMPROVIMI3IT~ M~IZGTPIL SERVICE BENKFZT UNIT TO RIIMBUR~K THE FROFKRTYAFPRAZSI:R AND TAX COLLL'TOR FOR COSTB OF SPECIAL ASSKSSMKNTS NITHZN TH~ KUCLZD AND LAEKLMID &VI3IUES ROADMAY IMFR~ MSBO ON 1902 TAX BILLS AS IOI-AD This Item was discussed tn conjunction with Items #gA, #90 and ~gD. 'C~TTJOd~mlllBmmlT, to &pprov~ tho A~t ~or the ~cltd ~d ~~~ ~y l~r~to ~tct~1 Se~tce bneftt ~lt (~) M ~~ tb ~rW i~rltHr nd T~ Collator. Page 38 Narch 24, ~992 Thio item was discussed in conjunction with Items #9A, #gB and ~9D. ~M Mlmly, to a~ the ~t for the ~11c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ll~to~. Page 39 Narch 24, 1992 ~T~D lklt~k OF COLLIER COUNTY FOR TR~ COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY ORDINANCE OI TH~ 1992 TAN BILLS A~ NON-AD VALORD~ This item was discussed in conjunction with Items #gA, #gB, and #9C. ~~~1~, to m~ the ~~t for the ~ ~ ~ A~ra~r ~d T~ Collator for the c~tm ~~ ~tm within the ~/nco~rat~ ~em of Collier ~ ~ ~llte~ ~W Stomter Uttlt~ ~dt~ce on t~ 1992 T~ Page 40 County Attorney Cuvier revealed this Item was originally placed on the Consent Agenda as It was a previously approved Item by the Board of County Commissioners, with this being the contract actually tmple- ~i; menttng that prior approval. Commissioner Volpe expressed surprise at the $52,000 and $24,000 J' unounte of the contracts. Assistant County Attorney Manaltch responded that the amounts were discussed during the selection process with representatives of the · "~ Couflty Manager. Court Administration, Purchasing, etc. He relayed his ~-. ~inderstanding that the firm of Faerber and Htssam are doing a good Job, indicating they are capable of hand/lng the work load. County Attorney Cuyler remarked all parties, including the County Fiscal Officer, are confident this will, in fact, reduce costs or at least keep costs down. Assistant County Attorney Mansllch explained a negotiated agreement with the firm of Treiser, Kobza0 Letgh and Hagaman will be forthcoming to address situations of conflict or overload. He revealed that last year approximately $50,000 was paid in dependency appointments, while currently contracting for $52,000 to handle 100 Iff" dependency appointments plus 60 shelter hearings and other regular Juvenile intakes. A brief discussion ensued regarding conflicts posed with the firm of Mr. Faerber, concluding with County Attorney Cuyler stating there is no legal conflict and no conflict under any School Board Statutes which Mr. Faerber would operate under. Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of retaining the !, ~ Public Defenderts Office or its employees which have been furloughed in lieu of private law firms, concluding with County Attorney Cuyler stating he wtll check on the matter. Frances Barsh advised she requested this matter be pulled from the 000.,., lt[l Page 41 March 24, :1992 ,,' Consent Agenda for several reasons, a number of which have already been addressed. She agreed it ts economical and a good way of doing things by contracting directly with attorneys to insure a direct line of care for the problems that do exist. She questioned whether a conflict exists by Mr. Faerber being a member of the School Board and ~:'~,, Children's Services Council and was advised he had real,ed from ~he :~ Chlldren~s Se~lces Co~c~l. ~~ ~1~, to a~r~ t~ n~t~at~ c~tracte ~r ~ 144 Page 42 March 24. 1992 ' altDZlllll~ I~-ll I~']'AIBT.,Z~llZI~ A TOt~RZ~Z' DIV~LOI~:IT CO0]ICZ~- - AZX31~'IZ) Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 5, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider an Ordinance establishing the Collier County Tourist Development Council. Assistant County Attorney Wilson verified this agenda item has been properly advertised. Referring to page 3, Responsibilities and Duties section, Co,missioner Goodnight interpreted the first sentence to mean it is the Board of County Commissioners' authority to decide whether a tourist development tax will be levied. She expressed a desire to see, as part of today's motion, that a tourist development tax will be placed on the ballot as well as the specific amount to be levied. Conisstoner Volpe questioned the advertising requirements re/e- rant to compliance with Commissioner Goodnight's request. Assistant County Attorney Wilson advised that the Ordinance is atlntctured in a manner to make it clear to the Tourist Development Council that it is not their duty to determine whether or not a tax should be levied but rather only to come up with a plan to submit back to the Board of County Commissioners of the manner in which the funds w~ll be ut~lized. She explained the Second District Court of Appeals' opinion determined there must be a plan submitted from a TDC {Tourist Development Council) prior to submission of the issue to a referendum. She &greed there probably should be no language in the Ordinance which ~;uld lev~ the tax without advertising it for a public hearing, but determined it is appropriate and within the purview of the Board of County Commissioners to discuss today the amount of lev~ for con- mtderatton by the TDC (Tourist Development Council) in developing their plan, stating it can be done by Resolution. A brief discussion ensued regarding various interpretations of the section on Responsibilities and Duties of the TDC (Tourist Development Page 43 March 24, 1992 Council) as contained in the proposed Ordinance. In response to Commissioner Saunders, Assistant County Attorney Wilson stated there is a provision in the State Statute that says within at least sixty (60) days prior to the enactment of the Ordinance that actually levies the tax the TDC (Tourist Development Council) ~ust be appointed. She concurred it is appropriate for the Board of County Commissioners to give direction to the TDC (Tourist Development Council), how many cents are to be included in the plan, Is ~rt of their statutory obligation to come up with a plan that deals with revenues for a twenty-four (24) month period. She reiterated it is appropriate, if so desired by the Board of County Commissioners, to adopt a Resolution giving direction to the TDC (Tourist Development Council) to start their deliberations. In answer to Commissioner Shanahan, Assistant County Attorney WA/son referred to page 3, Section 5, of the Ordinance revealing ~an~uage has been added clarifying it ts solely the responsibility of the Board of County Commissioners to determine whether the tax should bo levied; that, in the third sentence, it specifies that the admi- nistrative duty of the TD~ (Tourist Development Council) ia to come up with a plan; and that, at the bottom of the page, is the time deadline for presentation before the Board of County Commissioners, to bi determined today. She pointed out, on page 4 of the Ordinance, ~agraph B, an entirely new paragraph that puts the TDC (Tourist Development Council) on notice that, if they are unable to fulfill their responsibility tn developing a plan, the Board of County Commissioners will have the option of dissolving the TDC (Tourist Development Council) and creating a new one or resorting to legal rllediee, as the County sees fit. Assistant County Attorney Wilson declared the membership of the TDC (Tourist Development Council) is composed of the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners or his designee, and two elected offi- cials, one required to be from the most populace municipality, thus, one from the City of Naples, and the other being from the City of Page 44 March 24, 1992 Everglades. She related there are to be three members frae the owner/operator category, and three members that have an interest or are Involved tn the tourist industry and tourist development. Assistant County Attorney Wilson announced that Section 9 found on page 5 of the Ordinance presented today should be changed to read, "This Ordinance supersedes Ordinance No. 90-43, the Tourist Develol~aent Tax Ordinance, for all purposes relating to the establish- sent of a Collier County Tourist Development Council and to 1ts po~ers, duties and functions, and other matters relating thereto." A brief discussion ensued regarding whether Section Nine of the proposed Ordinance places Collier County in Jeopardy in reference to the $5,000,000 collected pursuant to Ordinance No. 90-43 in terms of litigation and the Act of General Applicability passed by the Legislature that covers the County's particular circumstances, at which tile County Attorney Cuyler explained those parts of the Ordinance dealing with the TDC (Tourist Development Council) have been luperseded, with concerns regarding same being addressed between now a~d when the second Ordinance is adopted levying the tax. In response to Commissioner Saunders questioning the adequacy of Section Eleven of the proposed Ordinance, County Attorney Cuyler indicated the proposed language is fine. ~eelo~er maunders ~oved, ~c~d~ ~ Co~tssi~r ~t~ =~ly, to clo~ the ~blic he~tng. ~~ ~rs ~, ~c~d~ ~ Caisst~r S~, to ~ ~ ~e with t~ c~ to the ~r~i~ ~tt~te~ on pa~ 3 for the date the plan ~hall be ~ (Tour/at Development Council), that the Board of ; ~~#i~aers ~ appointments to the TDC |Tourimt Dev~lopae~t ~Al) ealprtl 14th, and that the first ~eeting of the TDC (Tourist I~lvelelleai ~tlaeI1} be the folloetng ~ek. A brief discussion ensued regarding the requirement of represen- ii' ration of the most populace ~nAntctpality in Collier County, resulting Page 45 March 24, 1992 Dls~sston eneued r~gardtn9 th~ Interpretation of paragraph (d) of the pro~s~d 0rdtn~=~, t.~. who may s~rve on th~ TDC (Tourist ~slopaent Co~otl), =on=ludtn9 with Assistant County Attorney Wilson advtstn9 ths lan~age tn th~ Ordinance ts exa=tly the lan~age out of tbs Ststut~ ~d, therefore, should b~ l~ft as ts. U~n Asstst~t Cowry Attorney Wilson ~esttonlng how the Board of C~W Co~isstoners intends to have the two municipalities h~dled, ~d foll~tng a brtef discussion regarding same, it was the consensus that letters ~ directed to the Mayors of the City of Everglades and the City of Naple8 re~esttng they provide resumes of persons they wish to have considered for appointment to the TDC (Tourist D~elop~nt Co~cll) to the attention of the Board of Cowry C~tssi~er8. In u~r to Assistant Cowry Attorney Wilson ln~trtn~ about the ~ard of Co~ 0oulsstoners' direction on who will be their repre- Sentitt~ on the ~ (Tourist Development Council), tt was the =onsen- Ks that the ChairB~ of the Board of County Coutsstoners will aerve. Co,missioner Goodntght again requested that an Item be placed on the agenda concerning Doris Graham's Day Care and a request for an impact fee waiver, and was informed it will be on the agenda for next week. Page 46 March 24, 1992 Regarding ~ullet fishing, Commissioner Volpe reported that, although Narco Island presented Its information to Representative Hawkins, the remainder of the County has not, i.e. Goodland, Vanderbtlt Beach, Isles of Capri City of Everglades, etc. A brief discussion ensued with Assistant County Attorney Wi/son Illnounclng a quote of $3,700 has been received for providing the legal descriptions for the balance of the unincorporated area of Collier County, with the consensus being to direct County Manager Dorrlll and staff to provide the necessary legal descriptions. Co.missioner Volpe announced the Environmental Advisory Board has developed a Manatee Protection Ordinance, with consensus of the Board of County Commissioners being to direct EAB (Environmental Advisory Board} to proceed with workshops regarding same. A brief discussion ensued regarding the Coastal Zone Management Plan and letters from the Florida Audubon Society and Mr. Beardsley regarding same. County Manager Dorrlll stated he will ascertain the ' status of same and report by Thursday. Commissioner Volpe reported a request that he sign a letter regarding projects with the Florida Housing Finance Authority, with the consensus being to circulate copies of same with the matter to be addressed by the Board of County Commissioners at next week's meeting. ~c*" County Manager Dorrill suggested rescheduling the Budget Workshop due to the lateness of the afternoon. It was the consensus to resche- dule the Budget Workshop for tomorrow night, commencing at 5:05 P.M. .... Illl ~e~l ~/9, t~t t~ foll~n~ ~t~ ~r the ~t ~ LITTHI OF CRIDIT ACCKPTKD AS SECURITY FOR ~APING FOR PLAN liS. 92-23, 'BONITA FIRE STATION', LO~ATED IN T~III~I/P 48 SOOT~, WA]VOX 25 ZJLST BUD~ETAMB3EDMI31T TO INCREASE THI M~'FROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MFS) FOIID 126 BY $13,875 FOR A COMFREHENSIVK PLAN COIrSISTKNCY GRANT 180 Page 47 Narch 24. 1992 --'JUI)~r'~ TO I]~CRIASE THI MITROPOLI?AN PLANNIN~ OR~U~ZATION (M~O~FUMD IH BY 8~5.000 FOR AM URBAN TRAWSPORT&TION FL,tl UPDATE ~ STAIrDBY LKTTKR OF CREDIT ACC~PTKD AS SKCURZTY FOR · ~ PKBNXT J~0. 59.114. "CRY~rAL LAK~". LOCAT~D IN SKCTI(FI~ 26. ~ &e m, RAW(3E 26 EAST See Pages ~*RB:SOLIFf~OJI92-178 PROVIDZWG FOR ASBISSMH3FT 0F LZKN FOR THE COST OF &B&TB~ITO~P~BLZC IIUZgANCK OW T~:FT 20, BLOCK 1, SOUTH ZIOOOKALKK See Pages ~01 ~-170 PROV/DIWG FOR ASSK$SMK3Ff OF LIKN FOR THE COST OF AB&TBIIIT-GIP lmgB;LlC IIU/B~ OW LOT 10, BLOCE 7, CARSOWUS SUBD/VZBXOW, 0~-181FROVZDIJI~ FOR AOSKSSMKFf OF LIKR FOR THE C08T OF ' AB&*I"B~IrT O~P~B~IC IIUZSJI3ICE OW LOT 21, BLOCK 97, UNIT 3, GOLDKN G&TK ~TAT~, ~ D* JACOB~ON, TRU~I'~ OF TRUST B See Pages Ite~16B1 deleted JLPFROFRZATIWG UNBUDGITID CARRY FUND 606, (1AC TRUST RS&DS " iii 00,.,,,. 181 Page March 24, 1992 BID ~1--1~1a FO~ TH~ PORCHASE OF SPORTS EQUIFM~NT AND 0AMES A~qRD~D TO PTILM~B ~ Flt~D0CTS, SPORTILY, BSN SPORTS AND U.S. ~ See Pages ~ lteu#181! ]I:I:SOLUTZOII 92-182 &FPROVZRG TH~ UFI:JA~D PAY AIFD CL&SS/FIC&TZON PLA~ See Pages continued to 3/31/92 STOCKPILED AT TH~ ~ LANDFILL DKCLARED 9URFLU~ ~,~ &UTIIO~I~ED TO SIGN CEIqTIFICAT~ OF CO~KECTION TO THE ~OLID ~i.?~T~ ~W.E~T~I 9P~CXAL AS~MEMT ROLL ~(YD~NT~NDM~MT TZt~M~FE~ING FUMD~ FROM RK$~ZqVES, FUND 345, R~GXOMAL P~ ~TF~, TO CO~T CENTER 156390, VINEYARDS COMM~MXTY PA~E - XM ~ ~ ~ TO ~ CONTRACT #ITll MITCHELL AND STARE COM~T~UCTXON ~,;'~' ~O. F~3~t ~ XXI-C DTXLXTX~ SIT~ MODIFICATION FOR PELICAN BAY · ~F~ DIVXgXOM -- IM THE AMOUNT OF $30,547.79 Page 49 March 24. 1992 ~: O01TIUItL'r~BI~J0. g2-1856~ BO~ CONBTRUCTZONAT ". ~ W PAEE - &NLRDED TO OARLJOID & (LP,q.L,MID, XJK::., XN ~i~ TIII~I~ALBAS~BIDMIOOlrTOr 025,828.65 Its rill4 Ja~d to IOH4 OBRTll~CAII~ O~ COJI~ICTIOll TO THE TAX ROLLS AS PRESKIFT~D BY THI 1990 TAX ROLL 310/312 1991 TAX ROLL 03/10/92-03/19/92 159/160, 162/165 03/09/92-03/19/92 1991 TA]IG/BLE PKRSOXAL PROPKRTT 1991-72/1991-74 IITRA SJL1]I TI;MI ~JJt /]IMAm IIOS. 49500 AID 24131 03/10/92-03/18/92 The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and/or referred to the various departments as indicated below: .1. Memo dated March 17, 1992, to Catherine Dahlstrom, Administrative Secretary to the BCC, from Catherine M. Riehm, Assistant Controller, enclosing Cow Slough Water Control District Public Facilities Report and Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District Public Facilities Report and Distrlct Map. Filed. 2m Letter dated March 9, 1992, to Chairman, BCC, from 3on M. Igleh&rt, Enviroruaental SpeciaIist, Department of Environmental Regulation, re: Collier County - WRR, File No. 112096935; application for dredge and fill activities filed by the South Florida Water Management District. Copies to Bill Lorenz, Frank Brutt, Harry Huber, and flied. 3e Letter dated March 11, 1992, to Chairman, BCC, from Jon M. Iglehart, Environmental Specialist, Department of Environmental Regulation, re: Collier County - WRR, File No. 112099285; application for mangrove alteration activities 183 P.g. 50 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. March 24, .1992 filed by 5eaumer Condominium Association. Copies to Bill Lorenz, Frank Brutt, and fi/ed. Dated February 28, 1992, from the Department of Environmental Regulation, Notices of Proposed Rulemaktng and Public Workshops. Copies to Bill Lorenz, Frank Brutt, and filed. Memo dated March 12, 1992, to Chairman, BCC, from Gloria Woods, Health Services and Facilities Consultant, Emergency Medical Services, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, re: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) County Grant Exl~enditure Report Reminder. Copy to Jay Reardon, and filed. Letter dated January 14, 1992, to Commissioner Goodntght from Todd J. Logan, Refuge Manager, F/or/da Panther and Ten Thousand Islands National Wildlife Refuges, Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior, enclosing "Everglades In The 21st Century - The Water Management Future 1992, The Everglades Coalition". Copies of letter to BtI1 Lorenz, Mike Arnold, and filed. Letter dated March 2, 1992, to Commissioner Goodntght from Mark A. Hendrtckson, Executive Director, Florida Housing Finance Agency, requesting couents re: application for Low-Income Rental Housing Tax Credits from Co/l/er Andrew's Points Affordable Associates, L.P. Copies to Frank Brutt, Gregory Mthaltc, Nail Dorrlll, and filed. Letter dated March 6, 1992, to Chairman, BCC, from Nancy Gu~ter, Legal Assistant, Goldberg, Goldsteln & Buckle¥, P.A., re: Timothy Gets/er v. Collier County Sheriff's Department. Copies to Nail Dorrtll, Ken Cuyler, Sheriff Hunter, and filed. Letter dated March 2, 1992, to James C. Giles, Clerk of the Circuit Court, from Donald R. Paterson, Fire Chief, Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District, enclos/ng updated "SI)sc/al District Public Facilities Report" Filed. Agenda of 3/19/92 and Minutes of the 2/6/92 Collier County Planning Commission. Filed. Preltmtnar~ Notice to Owner dated March 5, 1992, to BCC from Peninsular Electric Distr., under an order given by Edwards Elec Corp., for lighting fixtures, electrical material/supplies for Col//er County North Regional Waste Water Treatment Plant. Copies to John Yonkosky, Steve Carnal/, and filed. Not/ce to Owner dated March 5, 1992, to BCC from Allen Concrete & Masonry Inc., under an order given by Tamtamt Builders, Inc., to perform masonary work for Control Building Waste Water Collection, 3500 Thomasson Drive. Copies to John Yonkosk¥, Steve Carnell, and filed. Letter dated March lO, 1992, to Co]Ilar County from Susan S. Peraz, Office Manager, Blankenshtp and Associates, Inc., enclosing Notice to Owner dated March 9, 1992, under an order given by H.T.S. Controls, for materials, labor and/or esr- vices for Fox Fire. Copies to John Yonkosky, Steve Carnelt, and filed. CoN to BCC of Preliminary Notice to Owner dated March 9, ],992, to Rocket Industr/es from Davis Meter & Supply Company, Davis Water & Waste Industries, Inc., under an order given by Sterling Equipment, for construction of the East Golden Gate Well Field. Copies to John Yonkosky, Steve Carnell, and fi/ed. Page ~! IS. 16. March 24, 1992 Copy to BCC of Preliminary Notice to Contractor dated March 13, 1992, to Great Monument Const Co., under an order given by White Sands Const Co Inc., for fill dirt material and or land clearing debris disposal at the North Collier County Water Treatment Plant. Copies to John Yonkosky, Steve Carnell, and filed. Three letters dated March 13, 1992, to Commissioner Volpe from Barbara Hagen, Controller, Palmer CableVielon, enclosing checks pursuant to franchise agreement. Copies to John Yonkosky, Mike McNees, Nail Dorrill, and filed. 17. Notice of Hearing before the Florida Public Services Commission Issued March 9, 1992, to All Parties and All Other Interested Persons, re: Docket No. 910888-TI, initiation of show cause proceedings against Integretel, Inc, for billing in excess of the Interlata Rate Cap. Copy to Tom Olliff, and filed. 18. 19. Receipt issued March 11, 1992, from the District Court of Appeal, Second District, re: Case Nos: 92-00565 and 92-00566. Copies to John Yonkosky, Ken Cuyler, and filed. Memo dated March 17, 1992, to Catherine Dahlstrom, Administrative Secretary, BCC, from Catherine M. Riehm, Assistant Controller, enclosing South Florida Water Management District Annual Financial Report, Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and Management Letter and response for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1991. Filed. 20. Letter dated March 9, 1992, to Commissioner Volpe from Guy L. Carlton, Collier County Tax Collector, re: Annual Selection of Newspaper for 1992 Advertisement of Delinquent Taxes. Copies to BCC, Nail Dorrill, and filed. There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meattng was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 4:35 P.M. ~ * ,,,,,,,4 JA~; C* .GIL~S, CT,~RK : ~ .: ~I. .. . ,, ~,.~l.nute. ia.~Foved by the Board on a. presented, or as corrected BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL MICHA~ J. VOLPE, CHAIRMAN Page 52