The URL can be used to link to this page

CCPC Agenda 03/01/2012 R & EARCCPC MEETING AGENDA MARCH 1, 2012 MINUTES & RECORDS, TERESA POLASKI AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., THURSDAY, MARCH 1, 2012, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Note: This item has been continued from the February 16, 2012 CCPC meeting per the applicant: PDI- PL2012 -159, The Dunes PUD, a Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 for insubstantial changes to the Dunes Planned Unit Development Master Plan for the purpose of depicting the area for construction of a 49 slip boat dock facility in the manmade portion of the waterway labeled "Conservation Easement /Waterway" for property located at 11495 Vanderbilt Drive in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion item to BDE- PL2010 -979) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner] B. Note: This item has been continued from the February 16, 2012 CCPC meeting per the applicant: BDE- PL2010 -979' Vanderbilt Partners II, LTD, represented by Timothy Hall of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., is proposing a 261 -foot boat dock extension to allow a new docking facility to protrude approximately 281 feet from the Mean High Water line. The new boat docking facility is approximately 11,300 square feet of over water structure and consists of 49 boat slips. The subject property is located in the Dunes Planned Unit Development at 11495 Vanderbilt Drive, Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion item to PDI - PL2012 -159) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner, RLA, AICP] C. VA- PL2010 -2285: Lot 80 Plantation Island - a Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida relating to Petition Number VA- PL2010 -2285, granting a variance from subsection 4.02.14.C.4 of the Land Development Code (mangrove trees), on property hereinafter described in Section 24, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner] D. RZ-PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. -- An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a C -3 zoning district to a C -5 zoning district for the project known as SSP Associates, Inc. Rezone located south of Tamiami Trail East in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 1.75 +/- acres subject to conditions; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner] E. CPSS- 2011 -1: A petition requesting a small scale Growth Management Plan amendment to the "Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict ", to remove paragraph b., relating to transportation intersection improvements, and to remove related paragraph c.v., for property located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive, in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East (f 10 acres). [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner.] ADOPTION HEARINGS. Note: This item has been continued from the January 26, 2012 and February 16, 2012 CCPC meetings per CCPC. This item will be heard as an Advertised Public hearing then under Consent: A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Based Amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89 -05, as amended, specifically amending the Capital Improvement Element, Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element, Potable Water Sub - Element, Drainage Sub - Element, Solid Waste Sub - Element, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element, Recreation & Open Space Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, Economic Element, and Public Schools Facilities Element, and furthermore recommending Transmittal of these amendments to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] Note: This item is being continued to the March 15, 2012 CCPC meeting: G. VA- PL2011 -1410: Wahl Variance - A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, relating to Petition Number VA- PL20110001410, for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06.E.5 to permit a reduced side yard (riparian) setback from 15 feet to 9.3 feet on the eastern boundary of the property located at 8 Pelican Street West, Isles of Capri in Section 5, Township 52 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner] Note: This item is being continued to the March 15, 2012 CCPC meeting: H. BDE- PL20110001409: A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to Petition Number BDE- PL20110001409 for a 34.6 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 foot limit provided in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code to allow for a 54.6 foot boat dock facility in an RSF -4 zone on property hereinafter described in Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Michael Sawyer, Project Manager] 9. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS A. A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Based Amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89 -05, as amended, specifically amending the Capital Improvement Element, Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element, Potable Water Sub - Element, Drainage Sub - Element, Solid Waste Sub - Element, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element, Recreation & Open Space Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, Economic Element, and Public Schools Facilities Element, and furthermore recommending Transmittal of these amendments to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] 10. OLD BUSINESS 11. NEW BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM 13. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 14. ADJOURN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows /jmp AGENDA ITEM 8 -A Co er County MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 1, 2012 SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PDI- PL2012 -159, THE DUNES PUD (COMPANION ITEM TO: 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE, BDE- PL2010- 0979) PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Vanderbilt Partners II Ltd. 11125 Gulf Shore Drive Suite 301 Naples, FL 34108 REQUESTED ACTION: Agents: Ms. Karen Bishop 2335 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 408 Naples, FL 34103 Mr. Richard D. Yovanovich Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) approve an insubstantial amendment to the Dunes PUD (Planned Unit Development) Master Plan to: depict a 49 slip boat dock facility with a fishing pier, depict boardwalk/cart access to the boat dock facility from the residential buildings and add the following note: "The area depicted as conservation easement/waterway will allow the installation of boat docks as an accessory use to residential units and permit the use of the conservation easement/waterway for boating and other recreational activities. No boat docks shall be permitted within Water Turkey Bay." GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The Dunes PUD is located at the northwest intersection of Bluebill Avenue (CR -846) and Vanderbilt Page 1 of 9 PDI- PL2012 -159, THE DUNES PUD February 21, 2012 LWy LEE COUNTY BMITA BEACH ROAD (C.R. 885) BAREf00T BEACN LITRE CONDO HICKORY BAY E £ LELY BONITA BAREfOOi 5 SHORES r Jg. BELCH d' AUOUBON m NgLTI NAPLES CLUB Y RESEARCH P BTECHNCLOGY COUNTRY MAP. COUNTRY ARBWq TAKE BAY CWB STERNNG CLNB MEDDERM B fOREST 9 OAKS � 11 Two THE 10 �p WATERGLADES PE RGT PLAZA GLEN E ON THE SAY MEADOW BROOK ARBOR TRACE MLIAGE PLACE ESTATES ___ ____ _R VETERAN6 M MORTAL -- _A_ -------- BOULEVARD C ATCNEE BAY COCOHAICHEE TARPON BAY COVE (L� — A AZA IMPERIAL LAKES COC ILLA 16 US- 41/Wl=NS C.R. BBB PASS ROAD T4 17 r.T L /JJ WGGINS LAI(E TS GS,LEWDOD AT IMPEPoAL Wl-NS IMPERIAL NRENL INDUS C ES BAY GERMAN w- E NEST COCg1ATCHEE BAY COCOHATOHEE RIVER MST TAMIAMI PROFESSIONAL CENTER VANDERBILT 21 / NORTH 23 NAPLES PROJECT 20 THE "MA $ , COWER 22 HE" �" MEDICAL LOCATION TRACT 21 A P A 21 COLUER TRACT 22 CENTER AR 0 0 -W ARV IOR (ORI) PA" VETERANS N NAPLES4 --L.EE ROAD (C.R. BI6) CdAft ms GRAN A CREE SIDE l COVENTRY 2 SOVARE SHOP S COMMERCE PARN� ST. JOHN THE EVANGELIST PLACE COMES["' 29 CAIHLIC CHURCH TR �P RNTS NORTHSIDE �`O' DALY NEWS lER MWIG8 Iz VANDERBILT 28 3 27 28 I BEACH 9 C - STONEBRIOGE ESTATES NAPLES 2 PARK K _ a f Z Palcm > >$ W MARSH (DPI) 50 O PAVILION MiRANA LAKE PAVINON MEAGTO PELICAN ANDERBILi BEACH J 1. MARSH (OR,) 32 ROAD 35 x-. 33 DREENS O TAN U PENCAN LEMURA BAY AUKI �-- �HEA/VENLY cERALD ES 5 PINE RIDGE IJ 4 3 LOCATION MAP d 'WCCNS P K1 STATE PAP WATER TURKEY BAY V \ RMF -16M W Ew Ir Pei rf, Ait PETITION # BD -PL- 2010 -979 NON ST Y N PUD CCWFA PACT 21 a 0 SITE LOCATION A_mq ■�■I� ZONING MAP M PUD ORE LAKE MLLAS A NAPLES YEYORI.LL CMOEITS I i r \ T PUD MASTER PLAN - EXHIBIT A ILI i r \ T PUD MASTER PLAN - EXHIBIT A f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRESERVE -- - - - - - - - - . . . i I t - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -- - - -•II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . PFiSE3iVE' - - - - - - - - - - - - - II i - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEGEND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WETLANONPLANO PRESERVE A ----------- WATERWAY i" . . . . . . . . . . • LAND USE AREAS CONCEPTUAL . . . . . . . . . . . . MO S XCT To RELOCATION/ CHANGE PFWR TO CCNSMCDON - - - - - - - - - prom, --i-\ J- - PliESiVe . . . . . . . . . . . . ff - - - - - - - - - - NOTE: . . . . . . . . . . . ... THE AREA DEPICTED AS CONSERVATION - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . EASEMENT/WATERWAY WILL ALLOW THE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A- INSTALLATION OF BOAT DOCKS AS AN ACCESSORY USE TO RESIDENTIAL . . . . . . . . UNITS AND PERMIT THE USE OF THE "g, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONSERVATION EASEMENT /WATERWAY . . . . . . . . FOR BOATING AND OTHER RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES. NO BOAT . . . . . DOCKS SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN - - • - - - WATER TURKEY BAY. ji M IM ■ R2 FQ ■ ■ 4 %A..ou■noo DUNE AFEA AVENUE — -- — -- — -- — -- PUD MASTER PLAN - EXHIBIT B Drive (CR -901) in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, in Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF MAP CHANGE: The Dunes PUD (Ordinance number 98 -24) was originally approved in 1998 and was later amended in 2000 (Ordinance number 2000 -74). While the currently adopted PUD ordinance (Ordinance number 2000 -74) references boat docks as an accessory use to the residential development areas, the Dunes Master Plan (Exhibit A) in the currently adopted Ordinance number 2000 -74 does not show the exact location of the boat docks. This PDI (Insubstantial Change to the PUD Master Plan) shows the location of the boat dock facility as well as the following note: "The area depicted as conservation casement/waterway will allow the installation of boat docks as an accessory use to residential units and permit the use of the conservation easement/waterway for boating and other recreational activities. No boat docks shall be permitted within Water Turkey Bay." The proposed boardwalk/cart path from the Dunes residential buildings to the proposed boat dock facility is also shown on the proposed Master Plan (see Exhibit B). No further changes have been made to the PUD document text. This is a companion petition to BDE- PL2010 -0979, 11495 Vanderbilt Drive, a boat dock extension petition. ANALYSIS: Section 10.02.13. E. of the Land Development Code sets forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan are to be reviewed before they can be approved by the CCPC. The criteria and a response to each criterion have been listed as follows: a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the Dunes PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? No, there is no proposed change in the type of land use or increase in the total number of dwelling units which might have the effect of increasing the intensity of the use of the land or exceeding the maximum height of buildings within the development. It should be noted that the Dunes PUD document specifies the project density and intensity. The document also provides the development standards that regulate the height of the permitted structures and their setbacks. As a result, the request to amend the master plan that was approved with Ordinance 2000 -74 will not change the requirements contained in the PUD document. It should be noted that Section 3.4 of the Dunes PUD lists boathouses and docks as an accessory use to the permitted principal residential uses. Page 5 of 9 PDI- PL2012 -159, THE DUNES PUD February 21, 2012 J C. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five (5) acres in area? No, there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. The only change is to depict the 49 slip boat dock facility with a fishing pier and to depict the boardwalk/cart access to the boat dock facility. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non - residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? No, the proposed amendment will not increase the size of institutional, commercial, industrial and/or any other nonresidential uses. This amendment depicts the proposed location of 49 boat docks, a fishing pier along with a boardwalk/cart path from the Dunes residential buildings to the proposed boat dock facility. There is no relocation of nonresidential land uses as a result of this amendment. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? There are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. The boat docks are listed as a permitted accessory use in the Dunes PUD. The amendment is to show the boat dock location within the manmade waterway. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? No, as noted above, the proposed change will not create any additional vehicular generated trips based upon the ITE Trip Generation Manual. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed change should not result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No, the Dunes PUD currently lists boat docks as an accessory use to the residential dwellings. This amendment clarifies the location of the docks within the manmade waterway. Page 6 of 9 PDI- PL2012 -159, THE DUNES PUD February 21, 2012 Furthermore, the proposed boat dock facility is compatible with the 50 -60 slip boat dock facility across the waterway at Baker Carroll Marina. As a result, the proposed change will not bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with the adjacent land use. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No, this modification is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. The modification to the Master Plan does not increase the intensity of the permitted land uses. In addition, the PUD documents specify the project density and the total number of dwelling units that can be built along with the requirement for retained native vegetation and open space. The PUD document also specifies the uses allowed and provides development standards that regulate the height of the permitted structures. As a result, the proposed amendment will not change the approved density and/or intensity authorized by the PUD document or otherwise affect any element of the Growth Management Plan. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec. 2.7.3.5.4 or Sec. 2.7.3.5.6 of this Code. The Dunes PUD is not a DRI. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? Based upon the above referenced analysis, the proposed modifications are only to the Master Plan. As a result, there are no changes that impact any consideration deemed to be substantial. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): Please see Attachment D: Neighborhood Information Meeting Notes. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for PDI- PL2012 -159 on February 21, 2012. Page 7 of 9 PDI- PL2012 -159, THE DUNES PUD February 21, 2012 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) approve Petition PDI- PL2012 -159 representing an insubstantial revision to the Dunes PUD by changing the current Master Plan as shown in Exhibit A as compared to the proposed Master Plan shown as Exhibit B. (Please refer to pages 3 and 4 of this Staff Report for Master Plan exhibits.) Page 8 of 9 PDI- PL2012 -159, THE DUNES PUD PREPARED BY: Awo� amw� �A� 1 C/Y i �0 NANCY AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DGROWT �tD,�IH, EMENT DIVISION REVIEWED BY: RAYMOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION 02- 21 -zoc JeLc&AMDI/LWNZ, J ., P.E., DIRECTOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION APP D BY: � 2.zz�iZ NICK CAS ANGUIDA, DEPU ADMINISTRATOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION Attachment A: The Dunes PUD Ordinance number 2000 -74 Attachment B: Resolution Attachment C: Conservation Easement Documents Attachment D: Neighborhood Information Meeting Notes PDI- PL2012 -159, THE DUNES PUD February 17, 2012 Page 9 of 9 /.Jy:n+aa �? Q� ORDINANCE N0.2000- 7 4 0 V AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 8520S BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM PUD, RW -12 ST (3) AND RMF -6 ST (3) TO PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS THE DUNES, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLUEBILL AVENUE (C.R. 846) AND VANDERBILT DRIVE (C.R. 901), IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 188.55± ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 98 -24, FORMERLY THE DUNES PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. r- WHEREAS, Karen K. Bishop of PMS, Inc. of Naples, representing Vanderbilt,Partners IL-Ud., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification -:of the berpin described real property; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD cfiOUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that; SECTION ONE: The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from PUD, RMF -12 ST (3) and RMF -6 ST (3) to PUD Planned Unit Development all in accordance with the PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 8520S, as described in Ordinance Number 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 98 -24, known as The Dunes PUD, adopted on March 24, 1998, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. -I- ATTACHMENT A PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this /4/a day of 12000. ATTEST; DVYIGlfik'RROCK, Clerk A�f�yt�a�s tq`'Chair�n's . . �pprgved -iis -t 'Form and Legal Sufffcency " Marjo a S. Student Assistant County Attorney g:ladmin/PUD -97 -18(1 }/RN /im BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES D. C TER, Ph.D., CHAIRMAN -2- This ordinonc� fit ^d with the Secretary of Stote's Office the ��'day of z ood and acknowledgement f t aa' filing received this of BY p,o,ar ci.nc THE DUNES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING THE DUNES, A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: VANDERBILT PARTNERS II, LTD. -0-2 a m PMS, INC. OF NAPLES 2335 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH SUITE 408 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC JJILy� ORDINANCE NUMBER !jY7; AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL 2 DOCUMENT DATE 10/30 /00 Exhibit A TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF EXHIBITS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION 1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, LEGAL AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION SECTION 2 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SECTION 3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS SECTION 4 PRESERVE DISTRICT SECTION 5 GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS ii PAGE iii iv 1 -1 through 1 -2 2 -1 through 2 -5 3 -1 through 3 -3 4-1 through 4-2 5 -1 through 5 -6 EXHIBIT #A PUD Master Plan LIST OF EXHIBITS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 188.55+/- acres of property in Collier County as a Planned Unit Development to be known as the Dunes will be in compliance with the goals, objectives, and policies of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The Dunes is to be a multi - family residential and associated recreational use project that will be consistent with applicable elements of the Collier Growth Management Plan for the following reasons: 1. Traffic ways, utilities, and other public facilities necessary to serve the Dunes project are adequate. The Dunes will participate in the expansion of existing public facilities to the extent of its impact on those facilities via payment of impact fees. 2. The Dunes project will be compatible with and complimentary to existing and planned land uses in the vicinity. Project lands lie in a transition area which includes low -rise residential development and high -rise multi - family development. 3. The property was down -zoned during the Zoning Re- evaluation Process which resulted in an action establishing RMF 6 and RMF 12 (6) zoning districts essentially establishing a density of six (6) dwelling units per acre for mixed residential land uses. The property contains a gross acreage of 188.55 +/- acres and based on a density of six (6) dwelling units per gross acre, the PUD provides for five hundred and thirty one (531) dwelling units. The additional 100 acres is zoned RMF 6 and RMF 12 ST at 3 units per acre for a total of 300 units. The PUD proposes a total of 640 units on 188.55 +/- acres for a gross density of 3.39 dwellings per acre. This action makes the land use and density consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Development commitments contained within this PUD will ensure that development of the subject property will proceed in a manner consistent with applicable elements of the Growth Management Plan. SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "THE DUNES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE ". IV SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, LEGAL AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of THE DUNES. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All of Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 Addition, according to the plat therof recorded in plat book 10, at page 81 of the Public Records of Collier County Florida, and all of Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 10, at page 44 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of lot 4 of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 Addition; thence N.89 °52'20 "W. along the southerly line of said lot 4, a distance of 599.96 feet to the southwest comer of said lot 4, the same being the southeast comer of lot 10, block 1 of said wiggins pass landings unit no. 1: thence N.89 °52'20 "W. along the southerly line of said wiggins pass landings unit no. 1, a distance of 1400.65 feet to the southwest corner of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1; thence N.00 °1 4'00 "W. along the westerly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1, a distance of 1608.90 feet; thence N.34 °26' 15 "E. along said westerly line, a distance of 439.48 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1; thence N.87 °48'00 "E. along said northerly line, a distance of 1481.48 feet to the northeast corner of lot 3, block 3 of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1; thence S.02 °1 2'00 "E. a distance of 163.77 feet to the northwest corner of lot 1, block 3 of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1; thence N.87 °48'00 "E. a distance of 200.00 feet to the northeast corner of said lot 1; thence S.02 012'00 "E. along the easterly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1, a distance of 668.16 feet to the southeast corner of lot 1, block 1 of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1, the same being the northeast comer of lot 1 of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 Addition; thence S.02 °1 2'00 "E. along the easterly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. I Addition, a distance of 1209.93 feet to the point of beginning, parcel contains 88.56 acres, more or less. A portion of land located in the east 1/2 of section 20, township 48 south, range 25 east Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of the southeast 1/4 of said section 20, thence N.02 112'00 "W, along the easterly line of said southeast 1/4, a distance of 1970.20 feet thence S.87 °48'00 "W, a distance of 50.00 feet to a point on the westerly right -of -way line of Vanderbilt Drive, a 100.00 foot right -of -way and the northeast corner of lot 1, block 3, Wiggins Pass Landings, unit no. 1, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 10 at page 44 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, the same being the point of beginning of the parcel of land herein described; thence S.87 °48'00 "W., a distance of 200.00 feet to the northwest corner of said lot 1; thence N.02 112'00 "W., a distance of 163.77 feet to the northeast corner of lot 3, block 3, of said Wiggins Pass Landings, unit no. 1; thence S87 °48'00 "W, along the northerly 1 -1 line of said Wiggins Pass Landings, unit no. 1, a distance of 1481.48 feet; thence S.34 °26'15 "W., along the northwesterly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings, unit no. 1, a distance of 439.48 feet r =v to the northeasterly corner of Tract B, Baker - Carroll Point, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 8, at page 42, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence N.54 °47'52 "W, along the northerly line of said Baker - Carroll Point, a distance of 399.32 feet to an intersection with an agreed boundary line as recorded in official records book 68, at pages 235 through 250, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence N.790 17' 10 "E., along said agreed boundary line, a distance of 69.60 feet; thence N.02 °58' 30 "W., along said agreed boundary line, a distance of 1417.66 feet; thence N.27 °15'20 "W., along said agreed boundary line, a distance of 616.67 feet; thence N.87 °48'00 "E., a distance of 2472.71 feet to a point on the westerly right -of way line of said Vanderbilt Drive; thence S.02 °12'25 "E., along said westerly line, a distance of 1373.11 feet; thence S.02 °12'00 "E., along said westerly line, a distance of 667.03 feet to the point of beginning, parcel contains 100.00 acres, more or less. 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP Vanderbilt Partners 11, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA The project site is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Bluebill Avenue and Vanderbilt Drive, and is bounded on the West by the Baker - Carroll Point Subdivision as recorded in Plat Book 8 Page 42, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The property is bounded on the North by jurisdictional wetlands, on the East by Vanderbilt Drive, and on the South by Bluebill Avenue. 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The Project extends east from Baker-Carroll Point on the West and includes part of the manmade waterway on the West, to mangrove forests, to a beach dune vegetated with scubby Pine flatwoods. Natural drainage of the upland portion of the property is westerly and northerly into wetlands which border tidal waters. Water management facilities for the project will be of the constructed water storage type, either lake or created wetland marsh type, or a combination of the two. Storm waters which exit the storage areas will do so via one or more control structures which are authorized as a part of the water management permits issued by Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. Topography within the project is vaned, ranging from sea level to 12± feet above sea level. The entirety of the site, except for the mangrove fringe along the West boundary of the property, lies within Flood Zone AE (11 foot elevation) according to FIRM Panel 0189E. Soil types within the project include Basinger Fine Sand, Durbin and Wulfert Mucks, and Urban Land Satellite Complex. The Dunes project will be a multi- family residential and recreational facilities community which will be developed with a maximum of 640 dwelling units. The buildings will range from a height of one hundred and twenty -five (125) feet to one hundred and fifty (150) feet above the mean flood elevation established by law as illustrated on the Master Plan. 1 -2 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project, as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Development of the Dunes shall be in accordance with the content of this Planned Unit Development document and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as but not limited to Final Subdivision Plat, Final Site Development Plan, Excavation Permit, and Preliminary Work Authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the County Land Development Code (LDC) shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and all graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Dunes shall become part of the regulations which govern the manner in which the PUD site may be developed. D. Unless modified, waived or excepted by this PUD, the provisions of the LDC, where applicable, remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the land which comprises this PUD. E. Development permitted hereby will be subject to concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the LDC. 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND PROPOSED LAND USES The project Master Plan, including layout of streets and use of land for the various parcels, is illustrated graphically by Exhibit "A ", the PUD Master Development Plan. The nature and extent of land uses within the Project is indicated by the following table: 2 -1 MAXIMUM LAND USE INTENSITY SUMMARY USE MAX. D.U.'s Residential 640 Preserve /Open Space N/A 2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS ACRES 47.00+/- 141.55 +/- A. Prior to the recording of a Record Plat, and/or Condominium Plat for all or part of the PUD, final plans for all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate Collier County governmental agencies to insure compliance with the PUD Master Plan, the Collier County Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida, if applicable. B. Exhibit "A ", the PUD Master Plan, constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Subsequent to or concurrent with PUD approval, a Preliminary Subdivision Plat, if applicable, shall be submitted for the entire area covered by the PUD Master Plan or alternatively for portions or phases thereof as is developed. Any division of land and the development of the land shall be in compliance with Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code and the platting laws of the State of Florida. C. The provisions of Division 3.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts or parcels of land as provided in said Division in effect prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. D. The Developer of any tract or parcel approved for residential development contemplating fee simple ownership of land for each dwelling unit shall be required to submit and receive approval of a Preliminary Subdivision Plat in conformance with requirements of Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code prior to the submittal of construction plans and a Final Subdivision Plat for any such portion of the tract or parcel. E. Utility, road, public and private easements shall be established as required during the site development plan and/or plat approval process. F. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructure improvements regarding dedications and the method for providing perpetual maintenance of the common facilities. 2.5 MODEL HOMES/SALES OFFICES Model home, sales centers and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, viewing platforms, gazebos, parking areas, tents, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout the Dunes Community subject to the requirements of Section 2.6.33.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 2 -2 2.6 AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN Amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance as provided in the Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.7.3.5. 2.7 ASSOCIATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS FOR COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Common area maintenance will be provided by a Master Property Owners' Association to be created by the Developer. The property owners' association shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems, and preserves serving the Dunes community, in accordance with the provisions of this PUD, together with any applicable permits from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and South Florida Water Management District. 2.8 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERM, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences, and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout the Dunes Community. The following standards can be altered at the time of site plan approval by the Development Service Director. A. Landscape berms shall have the following maximum side slopes: 1. Grassed berms: 4:1 2. Ground covered berms: 3:1 3. Rip -Rap berms: 1:1 4. Structural walled berms: vertical B. Fence or wall maximum height: Six feet (6'), as measured from the finished grade of the ground at the base of the fence or wall. For the purpose of this provision, finished grade.shall be considered to be no greater than eighteen inches (18 ") above the highest crown elevation of the nearest existing road unless the fence or wall is constructed on a perimeter landscape berm. In these cases the wall shall not exceed six feet (6') in height as measured from the top of berm elevation for berm elevations with an average side slope of 4:1 or less, and shall not exceed four feet (4') in height from the top of berm elevation for berms with an average side slope of greater than 4:1 (i.e. 3:1). C. Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls may be constructed along the perimeter of the Dunes PUD boundary prior to subdivision plat or site development plan submittal. All such areas must be included in a landscape buffer easement on final plats, or in a separate recorded instrument. 2 -3 D. The South 25 feet of the property will be available for use by the owners of the Dunes Project and by Collier County under the conditions herein set forth. The area shall serve as a landscape buffer for the Dunes that will incorporate landscaping to buffer the Project from the adjoining right -of -way. It may also incorporate a wall or fence meeting County requirements. The area shall also be available for use by Collier County to incorporate a sidewalk, benches, storm sewers and vehicle turnarounds to be used in conjunction with a planned county park and parking area. This area will be established as such in any plat of the property and a non - exclusive easement shall be provided to Collier County that will restrict and limit public use in conjunction with the proposed park and parking area as and when developed. The Developer shall construct the landscaping and sidewalks within the area. Such improvements are site related and are not eligible for impact fee credits. All other improvements related to the proposed park and parking will be constructed by Collier County but may be constructed by the Developer at its election, and at its expense, and subject to approval from the County Parks Director. If the Developer elects to and does construct such other referenced improvements they will be eligible for county park impact fee credit. All setbacks will be measured from the south property line and the foregoing area will be included in the setback. E. The East 35 feet of the property will be available for use by the owners of the Dunes Project and by Collier County under the conditions herein set forth. The area shall serve as a landscape buffer for the Dunes that will incorporate landscaping to buffer the Project from the adjoining right -of -way. It may also incorporate a wall or fence meeting County requirements. The area shall also be available for use by Collier County to incorporate a sidewalk and landscaping. This area will be established as such on any plat of the property and a non - exclusive easement shall be provided to Collier County over said sidewalk. The Developer shall construct landscaping and sidewalks within the area. Such improvements are site - related and are not eligible for impact fee credits. All other improvements related to the proposed Vanderbilt Drive improvements will be constructed by Collier County but may be constructed by the Developer at its election, and at its expense, and subject to approval. If the Developer elects to and does construct such other referenced improvements they will be eligible for transportation impact fee credit.. All setbacks will be measured from the east property line and the foregoing area will be included in the setback. 2.9 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS The establishment of a Planned Unit Development is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control, as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.2.20.1. The Dunes community is planned as a private, functionally interrelated community under unified control, to be developed over an extended time period. The Developer will establish community-wide design guidelines and standards to ensure a high and consistent level of quality for community features and facilities, which include items such as landscaping, hardscape, waterscapes, signage, lighting, pedestrian systems, bicycle paths, pavement treatments, roadway medians, fences, walls, buffers, berms and other similar facilities. The Developer will achieve the above objectives by means of recorded covenants, conditions, and restrictions. 2 -4 2.10 GENERAL PERMITTED USES Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the Dunes PUD except in the Preserve District. General permitted uses are those uses which generally serve the Developer and residents of the Dunes community and are typically part of the common infrastructure or are considered community facilities. A. General Permitted Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under the Collier County Land Development Code, Section 2.6.9.1. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 4. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 5. Neighborhood parks, recreational facilities and community centers. 6. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and the Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 7. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.4 of this PUD. 8. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible. B. Development Standards: Unless otherwise set forth in this Document, the following development standards shall apply to structures constructed under section 2.10 A of this Document. 1. Setback from back of curb or edge of pavement of any road - Fifteen feet (15') except for guard houses, gatehouses, and access control structures which shall have no required setback. 2. Setback from property lines - Twenty (20') feet. 3. Minimum distance between structures - Ten feet (10'). 4. Minimum floor area - None required. 2 -5 5. Minimum lot or parcel area - None required. 6. Sidewalks, bikepaths, and cartpaths may be placed within County required buffers; however the width of the required buffer shall be increased proportionately to the width of the paved surface of the sidewalk, bikepath, or cartpath with approval of the Collier County Planning Services Department. 7. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein, are to be in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. 2.11 OPEN SPACES REQUIREMENTS The PUD Master Plan identifies approximately 165 acres included in the Recreation, Landscape/Open Space, Lakes and Preserve District designations. These areas fully satisfy the open space requirements of Section 2.6.32. of the Collier County Land Development Code. 2.12 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS Twenty Five Percent (25%) of the viable naturally functioning native vegetation on site shall be preserved or as otherwise approved with this PUD for a larger area of preservation. 2 -6 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREAS 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to establish land use regulations and development standards for the residential development areas indicated on Exhibit "A ", the PUD Master Plan. 3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS The maximum number of dwelling units permitted in the entire PUD is 640. The property contains a gross acreage of 188.55 + /- acres and based on a density of 3.39 dwelling units per gross acre, the PUD provides for 640 dwelling units. This action makes the land use and density consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. Distribution of the dwelling units in the residential areas is not predetermined and may occur as authorized via the Site Development Plan approval process. 3.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated "R" on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate multi - family dwelling types, accessory recreational facilities, essential services, and other customary accessory uses. Final tract configuration and actual acreages of all development tracts will be provided at the time of Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat approvals in accordance with Division 3.3 and Division 3.2, respectively, of the Collier County Land Development Code. Residential tracts are designed to accommodate internal roadways, open spaces, parks and amenity areas, lakes and water management facilities, and other similar uses found in residential areas. 3.4 USES PERMITTED A. Principal Uses 1. Multi- family dwellings including garden apartments. 2. Public parking lot. B. Accessory Uses 1. Uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses. 2. Boathouses and docks, subject to Sec. 2.6.21. of the Collier County Land Development Code. 3 -1 3. Recreational facilities and amenities that serve as an integral part of the residential development and have been designated, reviewed and approved on a Site Development Plan or Preliminary Subdivision Plat for that development. Recreational facilities may include, but are not limited to clubhouse, community center building and tennis facilities, parks, playgrounds and playfields. 4. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Planning Services Department Director determines to be compatible. 3.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Table 1 sets forth the development standards for the land uses within the "R" Residential Districts. B. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein are to be in accordance with the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. C. Development standards for uses not specifically set forth in Table 1 shall be established during the Site Development Plan approval process as set forth in Division 3.3 of the Land Development Code in accordance with those standards of the zoning district which is most similar to the proposed use. All yards and setbacks shall be in relation to the individual parcel boundaries, except as otherwise provided for by this Document, or except as authorized via the Site Development Plan approval process. 3 -2 THE DUNES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR TART R 1 DEVELOPMENT MULTI- HIGH -RISE HIGH -RISE STANDARDS FAMILY MULTI -FAM MULTI -FAM DWELLINGS I DWELLINGS II DWELLINGS H Parcel R -3 Parcel R -2 Parcel R -1 Minimum NIA N/A N/A Lot Area Minimum Lot Width NIA N/A N/A Front Yard 20 0.5 BH 0.5 BH Front Yard Vanderbilt N/A NIA 125 *2 Drive Front Yard for Side Entry Garage 15 N/A N/A Side Yard 0.5 BH 0.5 BH 0.5 BH Rear Yard Principal BH BH BH Rear Yard Accessory 15 15 15 Rear Yard '' 0.5 BH 0.5 BH 0.5 BH Maximum Not to exceed Not to exceed Bldg Height 25 125' 12 stories 150' 15 stories Distance Between Principal Structures 0.5 SBH 0.5 SBH 125 Floor Area 2000 SF 1800 SF 1800 SF Min. (S.F.) PH Building Height is measured from the Mean Flood Elevation to the highest habitable ailing height. 5J�j:(Sum of Building Height): Combined height of two adjacent buildings for the purposes of determining setback requirements. All distances are in feet unless otherwise noted. • 1 - Rear yards for principal and accessory structures on lots and tracts which abut a lake, non - jurisdictional open space or native vegetation preservation areas may be zero (0') feet except that when abutting a lake or water body an architectural bank treatment shall be incorporated into the design. 02 - Garage set back from Vanderbilt Drive shall be a minimum of 50 feet. Front yards shall be measured as follows: A. If the parcel is served by a public right -of -way, setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. B. If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed). 3 -3 SECTION IV PRESERVE DISTRICT 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within the Dunes PUD designated on the Master Plan as Preserve District. 4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Preserve on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate a full range of conservation and limited water management uses and functions. The primary purpose of the Preserve District is to retain viable naturally functioning wetland and xeric upland systems, to allow for restoration and enhancement of impacted or degraded wetland systems, and to provide an open space amenity for the enjoyment of the Dunes community residents. 4.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1. Passive recreational areas, boardwalks, including recreational shelters and restrooms. 2. Biking, hiking, nature and equestrian trails (excluding asphalt paved trails in wetlands). 3. Water management facilities, structures and lakes, including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural treatments. 4. Nature conservancy structure. 5. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Development Services Director determines to be compatible in the Preserve District. 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. All structures shall set back a minimum of five feet (5') from Preserve District boundaries and roads, except for pathways, boardwalks and water management structures which shall have no required setback. B. Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and residential properties from direct glare or unreasonable interference. C. Maximum height of structures - Twenty five feet (25'). 4 -1 D. Minimum distance between principal structures - Ten feet (10'). E. Minimum distance between accessory structures - Five feet (5'). F. Minimum floor area - None required. G. Minimum lot or parcel area - None required. H. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein are to be in accordance with Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of Site Development Plan Approval. Unless otherwise indicated, required yards, heights, and floor area standards apply to principal structures. 4.5 PRESERVE AREA CONSERVATION EASEMENT A non - exclusive conservation easement or tract is required by Collier County Land Development Code, Section 3.2.8.4.7.3. for lands included in the Preserve District. In addition to Collier County, a non - exclusive conservation easement may also be required by other regulatory agencies with jurisdiction over Preserve District lands. In addition to complying with the provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, said easement shall be provided in accordance with the terms set forth in any applicable permit granted by other agencies. The Master Property Owners' Association shall be responsible for control and maintenance of lands within the Preserve District. 4 -2 SECTION V GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of the Project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with this PUD document, Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Plats, and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this PUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the Land Development Code, Division 3.2 shall apply to this Project even if the land within the PUD is not to be platted. The Developer, its successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. 5.3 PUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit "A ", the PUD Master Plan, illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries, shall not be construed to be specific and may be modified during the platting or site development plan approval process. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5. of the Land Development Code, PUD amendments may be made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the Project. C. The following shall be considered minor changes and refinements: I . Reconfiguration of preserve areas, jurisdictional wetland limits, and mitigation features as a result of regulatory agency review. 2. Reconfiguration of lakes, ponds, canals, or other water management facilities where such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District and Collier County and where there is no further encroachment into preserve areas. 3. Internal realignment of rights -of -way other than a relocation of access points to the PUD. 4. Reconfiguration of residential parcels when there is no encroachment into preserve areas. 5 -1 5.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENTJMONITORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION A. Initiation of construction on the Dunes project began in calendar year 1999. Marketing of residential sites began in calendar year 1998. Construction is expected to be concluded by not later than calendar year 2009. B. Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section 2.7.3.6. of the Collier County Land Development Code. 5.5 POLLING PLACES Pursuant to Section 2.6.30. at the Land Development Code, provision shall be made for the future use of space within a common building for the purpose of accommodating the function of an electoral polling place. An agreement shall be recorded in the Official Records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, which shall be binding upon the Developer and its successors in interest that acquire ownership of such common areas including, but not limited to, condominium associations or homeowner associations, for community recreation/public buildings/public rooms or similar common facilities to accomodate an electoral polling place. Said agreement shall provide that such common facilites shall be used for a polling place if determined to be necessary by the Supervisor of Elections. 5.6 SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS AND STANDARD DESIGN SUBSTITUTIONS A. Private streets shall conform with the right -of -way width requirements of Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.5. of the LDC except as follows: 1. Cul-de -sac and local streets less than one thousand feet (1,000') in length are required to have a minimum forty foot (40') right -of -way width and two ten foot (10') wide travel lanes as required by Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.5 of the LDC. 2. All other cul-de -sacs are required to have a minimum forty foot (40') right -of -way width and two ten foot (10') wide travel lanes as required by Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.5 of the LDC. 3. All other local streets are required to have a minimum forty foot (40') right -of -way and two ten foot (10') wide travel lanes as required by Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.5 of the LDC. B. Cul -de -sacs may exceed a length of fifteen hundred feet (1500') as required by Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.6 of the LDC. C. Tangents between reverse curves shall not be required, Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.10 of the LDC. D. Street grades may exceed the four percent (4 %) requirement of Subsection 3.2.8.4.16.14. of the LDC provided that applicable Florida Department of Transportation, Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (FDOT MUMS) and AASHTO criteria are met. 5 -2 5.7 TRANSPORTATION The development of this PUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Work within the Collier County right -of -way shall meet the requirements of the Collier County Right -Of -Way Ordinance No. 93 -64. B. Both northbound and southbound turn lanes shall be required on Vanderbilt Drive. These turn lanes shall be in place and available for all phases of the Project including initial construction, sales center operation and residential and associated uses. C. Both eastbound and westbound turn lanes may be ultimately required for the proposed secondary entrance from Bluebill Avenue. Turn lanes shall be constructed in accordance with Collier County Right -of -Way Ordinance Number 93 -64. A driveway connection with a 50 foot radius shall be sufficient for serving the sales facility prior to the issuance of turn lane warrants. The completion of the access on Bluebill Avenue shall be coordinated with the completion of the proposed County park. The Bluebill Avenue access may be developed as a shared joint access with the County park. The Bluebill Avenue access shall be a secondary access for the Dunes development and may be eliminated at the Developer's request subject to approval by the County Transportation Department. Construction traffic and other truck traffic shall not be permitted through the Bluebill Avenue access. A sales facility and entrance may be operated by the Developer using this secondary entrance. Guests, deliveries, and all truck traffic shall use the main access on Vanderbilt Drive. A properly functioning card entry gate is an acceptable means of establishing the Bluebill Avenue access as a secondary entrance. D. The applicant shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting at all Project entrances at the time of the commencement of construction. E. Substantial competent evidence shall be provided by the Developer to the effect that the Project is designed to provide capacity and treatment for historical roadway runoff. In addition, site drainage shall not discharge directly in any roadway drainage system. F. All required improvements, excluding right -of -way donations for roadway segments specifically mentioned in the County's Five -Ten Year Work Plan, shall be considered "site related" as defined in Ordinance 2000 -03, the Collier County Road Impact Fee Ordinance, and shall not be eligible for credit toward any road impact fees required by that Ordinance. This stipulation specifically refers to site - related turn lanes mentioned in Paragraphs C and D above. G. The Developer shall contribute its fair share contribution toward the cost of traffic signals at any project entrance or at the intersection of Vanderbilt Drive and 111th Street, if and when deemed warranted by the County. Such traffic signals shall be owned, operated and maintained by the County. H. Compensating right -of -way for turn lanes and median areas shall be dedicated by the Developer to reimburse the County for the use of existing rights -of -way following the requirements authorized by Section 2.2.20.3.7. of the Collier County Land Development Code. Any such dedications shall be considered site related and there shall be no road impact fee credit due to the Developer. 5 -3 I. The Developer shall be responsible for the construction of a minimum 5 foot wide (minimum 6 foot wide along back of curb over the existing bridge) concrete sidewalk along the north side of the Bluebill Avenue frontage and up to and tying into the sidewalk at Delnor Wiggins Park to the west and Vanderbilt Drive to the east. The construction of the sidewalk shall be coordinated with the completion of the proposed County park relative to grade and location. Sidewalk improvements over the bridge may require additional bridge widening to accommodate travel lanes, bike lanes, curb and gutter, sidewalks and safety barriers. Such improvements are considered site related and there shall be no road impact fee credit due to the Developer. The Developer may satisfy this requirement by contributing the necessary funds for the improvements to Collier County. 5.8 WATER MANAGEMENT The development of this PUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. A copy of the SFWMD Surface Water Permit or Early Work Permit with staff report is required to be submitted to staff prior to final construction plan approval. B. An Excavation Permit will be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with Division 3.5 of the LDC and SFWMD rules. 5.9 UTILITIES The development of this PUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission lines to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, and/or owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. B. All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection facilities to be constructed will be customers of the County and will be billed by the County in accordance with the County's established rates. C. The on -site water distribution system serving the Project must be connected to the District's water main and must be consistent with the main sizing requirements specified in the County's Water Master Plan and extended throughout the Project. During design of these facilities, the following features shall be incorporated into the distribution system: Dead -end mains shall include dead -end flushing hydrants. 2. Stubs for future system interconnection with adjacent properties shall be provided to the property lines of the project at locations to be mutually agreed to by the County and the Developer during the design phase of the Project. D. The utility construction documents for the Project's sewerage system shall indicate that all sewage flowing to the County's master pump station is transmitted by one (1) main on -site pump station. Due to the design and configuration of the master pump station, flow by gravity into the 5 -4 station will not be possible. The Developer's engineer shall meet with the County staff prior to commencing preparation of construction drawings so that all aspects of the sewerage system design can be coordinated with the County's Sewer Master Plan. E. The existing off -site water facilities of the District must be evaluated for hydraulic capacity to serve this Project and reinforced as required, if necessary, consistent with the County's Water Master Plan to insure that the District's water system can hydraulically provide a sufficient quantity of water to meet the anticipated demands of the Project and the District's existing committed capacity. F. The existing off -site sewage transmission facilities of the District must be evaluated for the hydraulic capacity to serve this Project and improved as required outside the Project's boundary to provide adequate capacity to transport the additional wastewater generated without adverse impact to the existing transmission facilities. 5.10 ENVIRONMENTAL The development of this PUD Master Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules and be subject to review and approval by Current Planning Review Staff. Removal of exotic vegetation shall not be the sole means of mitigation for impacts to Collier County jurisdictional wetlands. B. All conservation areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 640.06 of the Florida Statutes. Buffers and setbacks shall be in accordance with Subsection 3.2.8.4.7.3 of the Collier County Land Development Code. C. Buffers around preserved jurisdictional wetlands shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules. Preserved jurisdictional wetlands and surrounding buffers shall be incorporated in the conservation areas which shall be platted. D. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic -free) plan for the site, with emphasis on the conservation/preservations areas, shall be submitted to Current Planning Review Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. E. The Developer shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) regarding impacts to protected wildlife species. F. In the event the Project does not require platting, all conservation areas shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or easements dedicated to an approved entity or to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance and subject to the uses and limitations similar to or as per Section 640.06. of the Florida Statutes. 5 -5 G. A gopher tortoise survey and relocation / management plan shall be submitted to Current Planning Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. A copy of the relocation/management plan shall be included on the final site plans/construction plans. 5.11 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Accessory structures shall be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure except that temporary sales buildings, trailers, marketing facilities, contractors' storage and office facilities and the like, may be erected and utilized during the period of project development and marketing. Such temporary buildings shall be removed upon completion of the marketing or construction activity which they are accessory to. 5.12 SIGNS All signs shall comply with Division 2.5 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. 5.13 LANDSCAPING FOR OFF - STREET PARKING AREAS All landscaping for off - street parking areas shall be in accordance with the Division 2.4 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. 5.14 PROVISION FOR OFF -SITE REMOVAL OF EARTHEN MATERIAL The excavation of earthen material and its stockpiling in preparation of water management facilities or to otherwise develop water bodies is hereby permitted. If it is demonstrated that fill activities on those buildable portions of the project site are such that there is a surplus of earthen material, then its off -site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the following conditions: I. Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a "development excavation" pursuant to Division 3.5 of the Land Development Code whereby off -site removal shall be limited to ten percent (to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards) of the total volume excavated unless a commercial excavation permit is received. 2. All other provisions of said Division 3.5 are applicable. 5 -6 N W +11\1 E 5 e n tso .wv "17 1' .• M30' Fi ®C vsumux M rksac f/ W1F7fIM1Y • LAW 1W AAW C M/f7PR•LL AV .R.t.CL7 m mmaounv pKKi POW m L.Lm1RiC+w rnerrne 11 1 1' 11 11 11 II 1 II II II 11 1� I 1 II ' 11 11 II I II 11 11 • 11 . . . . . . . f I II /1 11 ' 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1 I 1 1 1 �r I II 1 ., •�• n r PUD MASTER PLAN - EXHIBIT A STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: :-a ORDINANCE NO. 2000 -74 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners o"-n' the 14th day of November, 2000, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board c �' County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 20th day of November, 2000. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk. Ex- officio to Board_0f ` ":_ County Commissioners By: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 12 — A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER PDI - PL2012 -159 FOR INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO THE DUNES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEPICTING THE AREA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 49 SLIP BOAT DOCK FACILITY IN THE MANMADE PARTION OF THE WATERWAY LABELLED "CONSERVATION EASEMENT/WATERWAY" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 04 -41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission is authorized by the Board of County Commissioners to grant insubstantial changes to PUD Master Plans in accordance with Subsections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2.a.4 of the Land Development Code of Collier County; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly elected constituted Planning Commission for the area hereby affected, has held a duly noticed public hearing and has considered the advisability of Petition No. PDI— PL2012 -159, insubstantial changes as shown on the revised Dunes Planned Unit Development Master Plan, being Exhibit "A" to Ordinance No. 2000 -74. The Collier County Planning Commission has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2.a.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes to the Master Plan do not change the amount of acreage to be retained for preservation, conservation, recreation or open space; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Commission in public meeting assembled and the Commission having considered all matters presented. Vanderbilt Partners II, Ltd. / PDI- PL2012 -159 February 16, 2012 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT B f NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 filed on behalf of Vanderbilt Partners II, Ltd. by Karen Bishop of PMS Inc. of Naples, be and the same is hereby approved for an insubstantial change to the PUD Master Plan having the effect of revising the Master Plan to depict the area for construction of a 49 slip boat dock facility in the manmade portion of the waterway labeled "Conservation Easement/Waterway ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number PDI - PL2012 -159 be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of 52012. ATTEST: Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator Growth Management/Planning & Regulation Division Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: DRAFT Heidi Ashton -Cicko Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation Attachment: Exhibit A — PUD Master Plan 12- CPS - 01144 \18 Vanderbilt Partners II, Ltd. / PDI- PL2012 -159 February 16, 2012 2 of 2 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Mark P. Strain, Chairman N NGNOLI LEGEND CONSERVATION EASEMENT/ PRESERVE CON VAnON EASEMENT/ WA TER WA Y • LAND USE AREAS CONCEPTUAL AND SUBXCT -' RON/ To RELO' CHANCE PRIOR To CONSTRUCTION PERUIrTING. . . . . . . . . . . . PRESERVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - PRESERVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . IM PRESERVE ' . . . . . . . . . . . NOTE: ll�—A I .. . . . . . m . . . C4 THE AREA DEPICTED AS CONSERVATION EASEMENT/WATERWAY WILL ALLOW THE 3. . . . . . . . . . . INSTALLATION OF BOAT DOCKS AS AN ACCESSORY USE To RESIDENTIAL . . . . . . . . . • . . . ie UNITS AND PERMIT THE USE OF THE . . . . • . . . . ca CONSERVATION EASEMENT/WATERWAY . . . . . . . . FOR BOATING AND OTHER . . . . . RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES. NO BOAT . . . . . . . . . . • DOCKS SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN WATER TURKEY BAY. . . . . R2 R3 *ant* 1000 #b AN a a a 0 DUNE AREA BLUEBILL AVENUE PUD MASTER PLAN - EXHIBIT A THE DUNES - PUD PUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT A or t WgAtioalx�R en LEwS, L L 0htGMAN At Law I AV . Jf. low Rb, 1•.la, lkar6, t7urld. 33101 dVVVvlV Wit 7VVV aV. VV&A IICOIDID 10 0111CIAL IICOIDS of COL1I6I COOIII, 1L 01/11/2001 at 03:57ft BVICIt I. IIQCI, C111I Be PII 1500 OOC -.70 .10 COPIIS 19.00 N1SC 1.50 Ida: 1611! LOIOBAN 9 6ALIIt 1700 IAW SM 11619 BLVD 11000 V PALB BIAC1 ?133401 NDDLIR£d1S£D SUBMlTi"AL #060614 -1 Q UAL 14 20 AMENDED DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT TH ED O CONSERVATION EASEMENT Is given this �� day of 2006 , by Vanderbilt Partners 0, Ltd. ( "Grantor"), whose address is 6551 Ridge Drive, Suite 203, Naples, Florida 34108, to the South Florida Water Manageme istri ( "Grantes'). As used herein, the term Grantor shall include any and all heirs, successors or assigns of the Grantor, and all subsequent owners of the "Property" (as hereinafter defined) and the term Grantee shall include any successor or assignee of Grantee. WITNESSETH THIS AMENDED EASEMENT IS BEING RECORDED TO CORRECT THAT CERTAIN DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 2712, PAGE 1327 OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TO CORRECT THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED THERETO. WHEREAS, the Grantor is the owner of certain lands situated in Collier County, Florida, and more specifically described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. ( "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Grantor desires to construct (name of project) The Dunes ( "Project") at a site in Collier County, which is subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of South Florida Water Management District ( "District"); and WHEREAS, District Permit No. 11- 01725 -P ( "Permit ") authorizes certain activities which affect waters in or of the State of Florida; and WHEREAS, this Permit requires that the Grantor preserve, enhance, restore and/or mitigate wetlands and/or uplands under the District's jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the Grantor, in consideration of the consent granted by the Permit, is agreeable to granting and securing to the Grantee a perpetual conservation easement as defined in Section 704.06, Florida Statutes (2000), over the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the issuance of the Permit to construct and operate the permitted activity, and as an inducement to Grantee in issuing the Permit, together with other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, creates, and establishes a perpetual conservation easement for and in favor of the Grantee upon the Property which shall run with the land and be binding upon the Grantor, and shall remain in full force and effect forever. Standard form — July, 2001 • Iof5 ATTACHMENT C OR: 4088 PG: 0522 'Om�' The scope, nature, and character of this conservation easement shall be as follows: 1. It is the purpose of this conservation easement to retain land or water areas in their natural, vegetative, hydrologic, scenic, open, agricultural or wooded condition and to retain such areas as suitable habitat for fish, plants or wildlife. Those wetland and/or upland areas included in the conservation easement which are to be enhanced or created pursuant to the Permit shall be retained and maintained in the enhanced or created conditions required by the Permit. To carry out this purpose, the following rights are conveyed to Grantee by this easement: a. To enter upon the Property at reasonable times with any necessary equipment or vehicles to enforce the rights herein granted in a manner that will not unreasonably interfere with the use and quiet enjoyment of the Property by Grantor at the time of such entry; and b. To enjoin any activity on or use of the Property that is inconsistent with this conservation easement and to enforce the restoration of such areas or features of the Property that may be damaged by any inconsistent activity or use. 2. Except for restoration, creation, enhancement, maintenance and monitoring Is activities, or surface water management Improvements, which are permitted or required by the Permit, the following activities are prohibited in or on the Property; a. . Construction or placing of buildings, roads, signs, billboards or other advertising, utilities, or other structures on or above the ground; b. Dumping or placing of soil or other substance or material as landfill, or dumping or placing of trash, waste, or unsightly or offensive materials; C. Removal or destruction of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation, except for the removal of exotic or nuisance vegetation in accordance with a District approved maintenance plan; d. Excavation, dredging, or removal of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock, or other material substance in such manner as to affect the surface; e. Surface use except for purposes that permit the land or water area to remain in its natural condition; Standard form — July, 2001 0 2of5 OR: 4088 PG: 0523 f. Activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, or fish and wildlife habitat preservation including, but not limited to, ditching, diking and fencing; g. Acts or uses detrimental to such aforementioned retention of land or water areas; h. Acts or uses which are detrimental to the preservation of any features or aspects of the Property having historical or archaeological significance. 3. Grantor reserves all rights as owner of the Property, including the right to engage in uses of the Property that are not prohibited herein and which are not inconsistent with any District rule, criteria, permit and the intent and purposes of this Conservation Easement. 4. No right of access by the general public to any portion of the Property is conveyed by this conservation easement. 5. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liabilities related to the operation, upkeep or maintenance of the Property. 6. Grantor shall pay any and all real property taxes and assessments levied by competent authority on the Property. 7. Any costs incurred in enforcing, judicially or otherwise, the terms, provisions and restrictions of this conservation easement shall be borne by and recoverable against the nonprevailing party in such proceedings. B. Enforcement of the terms, provisions and restrictions of this conservation easement shall be at the reasonable discretion of Grantee, and any forbearance on behalf of Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any breach hereof by Grantor, shall not be deemed or construed to be a waiver of Grantee's rights hereunder. 9. Grantee will hold this conservation easement exclusively for conservation purposes. Grantee will not assign its rights and obligations under this conservation easement except to another organization qualified to hold such interests under the applicable state laws. 14. If any provision of this conservation easement or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this conservation easement shall not be affected thereby, as long as the purpose of the conservation easement is preserved. Standard form — July, 2001 • 3 af5 OR: 4088 PG: 0524 11. Grantor shall insert the terms and restrictions of this conservation easement in any subsequent deed or other legal instrument by which Grantor divests itself of any interest in the Property. 12. All notices, consents, approvals or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly given if sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the appropriate party or successor -in- interest. 13. The granting of the Conservation Easement shall not prohibit the riparian shoreline identified in Application # 981009 -22, Permit # 11- 01725 -P from being considered and used to determine the allowable number of boat slips for this Project. 14. This conservation easement may be amended, altered, released or revoked only by written agreement between the parties hereto or their heirs, assigns or successors -in- interest, which shall be filed in the public records in Collier County. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto Grantee forever. The covenants, terms, conditions, restrictions and purpose imposed with this conservation easement shall be binding upon Grantor, and shall continue as a servitude running in perpetuity with the Property. Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of said Property in fee simple; that the Property is free and clear of all encumbrances that are inconsistent with the terms of this conservation easement and all mortgages have been joined or subordinated; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to convey this conservation easement; and that it hereby fully warrants and defends the title to the conservation easement hereby conveyed against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set its authorized hand this day of Ja , 2006. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence as witnesses: Standard form — July, 2001 Vanderbilt Partners II, Ltd. A Florida L1mj1eed2aM4$ By: C,,,QuPG� Print Title: 4of5 OR: 4088 PG: 0525 9 STATE OF FLORIDA ) ss: COUNTY OF Cy1 tL zr On this i �r day of 20_.o b before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared ILeAeA A. Sl,. , pe. , personally known to me to be the person who subscribed to the foregoing instrum the and did not take an oath, as the (position) • -&AoAt of (corporation) A.. ky 964 .,Q,, -it �,Ii Florida 1,- n acknow dged that he executed the same on behalf of said sespefafien and that he was duly authorized to do So. ?"—qn6' MR- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF FLORIDA in Print Name: My Commission Expires: =abry public State of �bdda k M ouevwo mmi ssion DD535362 ' * 0411912010 South Florida Water Management District Legal Form Approved: Date: July, 2001 Standard form -- July, 2001 5 of 5 2618381 OR; 3713 ?G. 16 3:6 F—vt Rttna„w, farm - January. 1 "d . DEC12 OE CONSEBYAT ENT E �!�.. �',B t� 24th THIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMt` 'i�� . 'vin `this day Of July z000 by Vanderbilt Partners'`I' . Ltd. � (address) 5551 Ridgewood Driven Suise,.203 Naples, FL 34108 (Grantor) to the South Florida Water Management District ( "Grantee•). As used herein, the term Grantor shall include any and all heirs, successors or assigns of the Grantor, and ail subsequent owners of the ' Property' (as hereinafter defined) and the term Grantee shall Include any successor or a3aignee of Grantee. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Grantor' ~ )1)V-A& Florida, and more speelfical d in herein ('Property'); and t WHEREAS, the Gant it df35ire t nst The Durres I 'r""r which Is subject to the r ul to ju s Ic ro f� ('District "); and WHEREAS, Dist' it No. s 8, 10 p activities which affect surfs rs in or of the .© WHEREAS, this Perms ec wetlands under the District's iurisdictl situated in Co 111 a rCounty, red hereto and incorporated in Collier- County. later Management District Permit ") authorizes certain la; and rantor preserve and/or mitigate WHEREAS, the Grantor has developed and proposed as part of the permit conditions a conservation tract and maintenance buffer involving preservation of certair wetland and/or upland systems on the Property; and WHEREAS, the Grantor, in consideration of the consent granted by the Permit, is agreeable to granting and securing to the Grantee a perpetual conservation easement as defined in Section 704.06, plorida Statutes (1995), over the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the issuance of the Permit to construct and operate the Permitted activity, and as an inducement to Grantee in issuing the Pan1'tit. together with other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, creates, and establishes a t of 6 BD- PL2010 -979 REV: 3 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE DATE: 8/4/11 DUE: 8/18/11 C� 0 t OR: 2112 PG: 1313 F"M%v 1WMfirian form - 1anuwy. 19" perpetual conservation easement for and in favor of the Grantee upon the Property which shall run with the land and be binding upon the Grantor, and shall remain in full force and effect forever. The scope, nature, and character of this conservation easement shall be as follow*; 1. it is the purpose of this conservation easement to retain land or water areas in their natural, vegetative, hydrologic, scenic, open, agricultural or wooded condition and to retain such areas as suitable habitat for fish, plants or wildlife. Those wetland and/or upland areas included in the conservation easement which are to be enhanced or created pursuant to the Permit shall be retained and maintained in the enhanced or created conditierte m4ulrod by the Permit. To carry out this purpose, t basement: a. To equipment or vehicles unreasonably interfere + time of such entry; and the Property at b. To Ilh.a $ei�t,�jf a with this conservation a ern and to enfo of the Property that may aged by any 2. Except for rest reation activities, or surface water ma by the Permit, the following activities ht s are conveyed to Grantee by this times with any necessary in a manner that will not Property by Grantor at the )party that is inconsistent 9f SUCh areas or features or use. / `11 maintenance and monitoring " are permitted or required or on the Property: a. Construction or placing of buildings, roads, signs, billboards or other advertising, utilities, or other structures on or above the ground: b. Dumping or placing of soil or other substance or material as landfill, or dumping or placing of trash, waste, or unsightly or offensive materials; C. Removal or destruction of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation, except for the removal of exotic or nuisance vegetation in accordance with a District approved maintenance plan; d. Excavation, dredging, or removal of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock, or other material substance in such manner as to affect the surface; 2of6 • 0 OR, 2712 PG: 1314 lmve WOW ram - JUVVY, 199{ Q. SAW U94 8kC815t for purposes that permit the land or water area to rafnain in 09 Maturai eend'tlien: f. Activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, Water con3@ryatic(l, erosion control, soil conservation, or fish and wildlife habitat preoervation inctuag, tU not limited to, ditching, diking and fencing; g. water areas; Acts or uses detrimental to such aforementioned retention of land or h. eels or uses which are detrimental to the preservation of any features or aspects of the Property having historical or archaeological significance, %. Passive Necre+ Property, including the right herein and that are not Intent and purposes ei not contrary to the pu approval by the District a. tits for reserves all rights as owner of the Property that are not prohibited with any Ia. criteria. the Permit and the ion Easement. ' Pa ive recreational uses that are isly asem nt ay be permitted upon written walking t Grantor shall prvpvflecl � ' s to the Dist) vv ti MMNV 1• '( co b. The cons fan he approved passive recreational faclilttoa shall be sub o conditions: L Grantor shall minimize and avoid, to the fullest extent possible, impact to any wetland or upland buffer areas within the Conservation Easement Area and shalt avoid materially diverting the direction of the natural surface water Now in such area; ii. Such facilities and improvements shall be constructed and maintained utilizing Best Management Practices; clearing for the purpose of s, boardwalks or mulched for the construction of the .nd written approval prior to iiifi. Adequate containers for litter disposal shaft be situalea adjacent to such facilities and improvements and periodic inspections shall be instituted by the maintenance entity, to clean any litter from the area surrounding the facilities and improvements: 3of6 OR: 21112 PG: '1315 Pauvc Itecaaavn roar, - uavary. 1"I iv. This conservation easement shall not constitute permit authorization for the construction and operation of the passive recreational facilities. Any such work shall be subject to all applicable federal. state, QlStW or local permitting requirements. 4. No right of access by the general public to any portion of the Property is ccnveyed by this conservation easement. S. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liabilities related to the operation, upkeep or maintenance of the Property. 6. Grantor shall competent authority on the 7. Any costs and restrictions of this c the nonprevailing party i S. Enforvem easement shall be at it behalf of Grantee to e Grantor, shall not be d 9. Grantee wi purposes. Grantee will easement except to an appfkxw state laws, any and all real property taxes and assessments levied by easement shall or construed to b• this conservatl li�klqn its rights ow rwise, the terns, provisions by and recoverable against F t Ions of this conservation nd any forbearance ort of any breach hereof by tee's rights hereunder. exclusively for conservation ►ns under ihls conservation J such interests under the 10. If any provision of this conservation easement or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this conservation easement shall not be affected thereby, as long as the purpose of the conservation easement is preserved. 11. All notices, consents, approvals or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shaft be deemed property given if sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the appropriate party or wwe3aor•in- interest. 12. This conservation easement may be amended, altered. released or revoked only by written agreement between the parties hereto or their heirs, assigns or successors -in- interest, which shall be fried in the public records in Co 11 i e t County. 4of6 lie OR: PC: 1-31 Puave Refreshes form - ranovy. I"I TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto Grantee forever. The covenants, terms, conditions, restrictions and purpose imposed with this conservation easement shall be binding upon Grantor, and shall continue as a servitude running in perpetuity with the property. Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of said Property in tee simple; that the Property is free and clear of all encumbrances that are inconsistent with the terms of his conservation easement and all mortgages have been Joined or subordinated; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to convey this conservation easement: and that it hereby fully warrants and defends the title to the conservation easement hereby conveyed against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, _ authorized hand this_ i da Signed, sealed and deliv In our presence as witn so c0 Print Narne. ; ° n a c Pdnt Name:p STATE OF FLORIDA ss: COUNTY OF has hereunto set its ____ -199 I . c On this I day of before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared r '' , personalty known to me to be the person who subscribed to the foregoing instrument and did not take an oath, as the (position) » t . . :. i , of (corporation) �,, 1, ; + t.. a Florida corporation, and acknowledged that he executed the same on behalf of said corporation and that he was duly authorized to do so. 5 or 6 P&M Ve Reucation form - January, 1408 OR: 2.? 12 PG: 1-31 1'' IN WITNESS WHEREOF. l hereunto set my hand and official seal. NOTAFW PUBLIC, STATE OF FLOPIDA tint Name: --- My GofiilTiluion axpirw; i n'N `" `• •' ","•`° •, " B" "' * *w cwnr %"eOn cc ruglo ,yr.. E.pa"AMd10.2W2 South Florida Water Management District Legal Form Approved: SFWMD - January, 1999 `P )F oz, -'Q11f � 1. G" 6of6 OR: 2712 PG: 1318 AWA w AC JWT UV= Mr.QVArtav EASO"T ALL1700 PASSIVE REMWATJOW USE. APPDXWO"TM V P7.04 ACOW& 1-11&" ACAM Dr PAEF"rY M AC PUT ENDER fBNVVVAT)VN MrAlMrS "Y AWS Ir MCAl VAMP IN 90 *K MOEL AUT PUT LAMER CaVSMVATMN EASEMENT. low IrALE OEM &*WSW AM nN PM&TYAW RAPIM PLY AW AKwrwnmo FM CoNryatcrim USE vwx"m ok AMM"06 bwL man a basso" MEMO THE DUNES OR: 2712 PG: 1319 >aalb SURVEYORS do MAPPERS INC. 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 TEL. 941 -S97 -131 S FAX 941 - 397 -5207 CONSERVATION EASEMENT (ALLOWfNG PASSIVE RECREATIONAL USE) A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE ZS EAST ; THENCE 1316.81 2FEEW"r ALONG 4 SOUTH LINE OF OU'C'H LONE SAID SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF THENCE N.W07'40 "E., A DISTA r T TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF BLUE FOOT RIGHT OF WAY AND THE IVINT OF BF..GINN HE PARCEL 0 HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE N.89 °52'20 "W., O ORTH R10 OF AY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 487.50 FEET; THENCE 00 4'00 ST E of 1.9 FEET ; THENCE A POINT ALONG G THE MEAN HIGH WA R L; SAID MEAN HIGH WA L E N I"Y�NINE DESCRI61-:D COURSES 1) THENCE N.22 2T S "E., A DI T F E 2) THENCE N.45 "E., A DISTANCE 2 .8 T; 3) THENCE N.or ., A DISTANCE T; 4) THENCE N.30055' j DISTANCE OF 1- ET: S) TMN(F 1`1.34 °30 6 FEET; 6) THENCE N.38'1 I' 15., 22.70 FEET; 7) THENCE N.26 °28'34 "E., A DISTANCE OF 45.35 FEET; S) THENCE N.47 903'39 "E., A DISTANCE OF 30.33 FEET; 9) THENCE N.21 °3035 "E., A DISTANCE OF 13.33 FEET; 10) THENCE S.55 "19'56 "E., A DISTANCE OF 26.82 FEET; 11) TtWNCE N.7S °30'07 "E., A DISTANCE OF 63.12 FEET; 12) THENCE N.S499145 "E., A DISTANCE OF 26.39 FiXT; 13) THENCE 9.38 05722 "E., A DISTANCE OF 28.08 FEET, 14) THENCE S.20 04217 "E., A DISTANCE OF 30.10 FEET; 1 S) THENCE S.SS °28'32 "W., A DISTANCE OF 26.35 FEET; 16) THENCE S. 15019129"W.. A DISTANCE OF 22.23 FEET; 17) THENCE S.55 015'32 "E., A DISTANCE OF 3S.67 FEET: 15)'r'=NCE S.44-11-21 -E., A DISTANCE OF 14.22 FEET, 19) THENCE 5.54-4571"E.) A DISTANCE OF 13.06 FEET; 20) THENCE N.5V48'06 "E., A DISTANCE OF 19.10 FEET; 21) THENCE N.33"05'56 "E., A DISTANCE OF 21.28 FEET; I OF 5 OR: 2. 712 PG: 1330 22) THENCE N.01 00977 "E., A DISTANCE OF 42.95 FEET; 23) THENCE N.08 054142 "E., A DISTANCE OF 15.54 FEET; 24) THENCE S.89 02723 "W., A DISTANCE OF 27.24 FEET; 25) THENCE N.54 °08'30 "W., A DISTANCE OF 21.49 FEET, 26) THENCE N.42 °41'44 "E., A DISTANCE OF 26.82 FEET; 27) THENCE N23 °30'59 "W., A DISTANCE OF 26.62 FEET; 28) THENCE N.73 034'34 "W., A DISTANCE OF 36.87 FEET; 29) THENCE N. 13017-27-W., A DISTANCE OF 18.87 FEET. 30) THENCE N.04 °2938 "W., A DISTANCE OF 22.33 FEET; 31) THENCE N, 14-47-00-W, A DISTANCE OF 48.76 FEET; 32) THENCE N, 17-54-54-W,, A DISTANCE OF 32.99 FEET; 33) THENCE N. 13-25-36-W., A DISTANCE OF 29.50 FEET 34) THENCE N.09 °0957 "W., A DISTANCE OF 26.16 FEET; 35) TIMNCE N.1004113S "W., A DISTANCE OF 20.88 FEET, 36) THENCE N.19 °14'13 "W., A DISTANCE OF 35.48 FEET: 37) THENCE N. 13 °42'04 "w., A DISTANCE OF 27.27 FEET;. 38) THENCE N.39°5T13 "w., 7.28 FEET. 39) THENCE N.40 °22'08" EET; 40 THENCE NA 17'3 DISTANCE 0 ET; 40 THENCE N.54°�}Y49" TANCE OF 14.7 T, 42) THENCE N_05°12'52 T 15.04 E T; 43) THENCE N.20045'2 " 44) THENCE N.33° D S 2. E 45) THENCE N.0 S OF 7 46) THENCE S.88° "W., A DI TAN F 47) THENCE N.87 °1 W_, A DISTANCE ISr.7 ; 48) TtWNCE 1.45° , A DISTANCE T; 49) THENCE N.1 5°4611 " DISTANCE OF FEET; 51) THENCE N.16 °1748 "W., 0.58 FEET; 52) THENCE N.25 °39'41 "w., A DISTANCE OF 24.57 FEET; 53) THEN(;E. N.00°24'25 "W., A DISTANCE OF 29.74 FEET; S4) THENCE N. IV] 2'38 "W., A DISTANCE OF 21,54 FEET; 55) THENCE N.06024'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 23.53 FEET; 56) THENCE N.00 °11'20 "1~.., A DISTANCE OF 28.03 FEET; 57) THENCE N.03 °52'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 20.05 FEET; 58) THENCE N.02 °17'1I "W., A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET, 59) THENCE N.Ir55'13 "E., A DISTANCE OF 16.98 FEET; 60) THENCE N.03 019'54 "W., A DISTANCE OF 17.22 FEET; 61) T'HENCF- N.03 053'33 "E., A DISTANCE OF 34.03 FEET; 62) THENCE N_03 °48'31 "E., A DISTANCE OF 28.62 FEET; 63) THENCE N.03 °06'00 "E_, A DISTANCE OF 28.51 FEET; 64) THENCE N.07°SO'12 "W., A DISTANCE OF 27.58 FEET, 65) THENCE N.01 °03'54 "E., A DISTANCE OF 18.08 FEET; 66) THENCE N.05°4i'S3 "W., A DISTANCE OF 26.12 FEET; 2 OF 5 OR� � +1 p (41, . 1 '11 ; 27.62 P, , 2. 67) THENCE N.14 °21'01 "W., A DISTANCE OF 23.99 FEET; 68) THENCE N.01 °18'39 "E., A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 69) THENCE N,09 °00'32 "E., A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET; 70) THENCE N.00 °37'32 "E., A DISTANCE. OF 26.47 FEET; 71) THENCE N.02 °49'07 "E., A DISTANCE OF 29.20 FEET; 72) THENCE N.02 °58'47 "E., A DISTANCE OF 30.28 FEET; 73) THENCE N.00 °50'14 "W., A DISTANCE OF 24.92 FEET; 74) THENCE N. 16-54-54-W., A DISTANCE OF 25.04 FEET; 75) THENCE N.05 °54'42 "E., A DISTANCE OF 24.89 FEET; 76) 11I3ENCE N.04 040'05 "E., A DISTANCE OF 27.35 FEET; 77) THENCE N.05 04936 "W., A DISTANCE OF 25.87 FEET; 78) THENCE N,09-1 1'48"E., A DISTANCE OF 22.23 FEET; 79) THENCE N.07 °59'19 "E., A DISTANCE OF 32.14 FEET, 80) THENCE N.06° 19'23 "E., A DISTANCE OF 28.29 FEET; 81) THENCE N.07 °47'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 25.29 FEET; 92) THENCE N.03 009'34 "W., A DISTANCE OF 23.35 FEET; 93) THENCE N_04 000'22 "E , A 1 21.98 FEET; 84) THENCE N.18 °13'30" . ' 5 FEET; 85) THENCE N.50 °36'3 ISTANCE O 3 9,tEET, 66) TMNCE N.89 °5 l A DISTANCE OF 17, 6 F T; 87) THENCE N.41° 11 E. IS 22.7 T; 88) THENCE N.61 5'1 7 EE ; 89) THENCE S.99 T . Pk T; 90) THENCE: N.78 S 91) THENCE S. 7 F 3 F 92) 'THENCE S.730 ` , "E., A DISTANCE 114. 2 E ; 93) THENCE S.58 °3 ., A DISTANCE 1 i 3 'T; 94) THENCE S.49 °59' DISTANCE OF I ET; 95) THENCE S.19 °05'48 EET; 96) THENCE S.56-25-36 E., .37 FEET; 97) TMNlQb $,$9 °13'14 -E.j A DISTANCE OF 27.00 FEET; 98) THENCE N.65 °07'37 "E., A DISTANCE OF ZO I6 FEET; 99) THENCE N44 054'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 11.50 FEET; THENCE S.73 001'42 "E , LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, A DISTANCE OF 345.51 FEET; THENCE S.45 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 195.23 FEET; THENCE N.44 °49'41 "E., A DISTANCE OF 29.35 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING- A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47013'38". A CHORD BEARING OF 5.971159104 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 56.08 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC, LENGTH OF 57.70 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.45 °09'35 "E., A DISTANCE OF 74.52 FEET, THENCE N.44 °49'41 "E., A DISTANCE OF 200.55 FEET, THENCE N.66 °18'04`E., A DISTANCE OF 12.65 FEET; THENCE N.70040'1 9"E., A DISTANCE OF 117.14 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 159.24 FEET, A CENTRAL. ANGLE OF 23 °3322 ", A CHORD BEARING OF N.58 °48'27 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 65.01 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 65.47 FEET TO THE END OF 3OF5 0R; '112 PG: 1322 SAW CURVE; THENCE N.38 013'26 "E., A DISTANCE OF 0.64 FEET, THENCE 5.69°005 "E., A DISTANCE OF 121.69 FEET, THENCE 14,81 °0625 "E., A DISTANCE OF 91.44 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 79.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93 °49'47% A CHORD BEARING OF S.20 °1822 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 115.39 FEET, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 129.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49016'46 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.01 058'09 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 20.85 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 2 1. 50 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 230.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 103 °3TOV, A CHORD BEARING OF 5.29°0517 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 361,59 FFXT; TlILKL ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 415.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 106 00677 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.27 °53'33 "E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 191.81 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 222.23 FEET TO THE P OUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING: A t CENTRAL ANGLE OF 85 031'55 ", A CHORD BE 67 055'37 "W, A �ORD LENGTH OF 230.86 FEET; THENCE ALONG OF SAID CURVE, C LENGTH OF 253.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANG N( DISTANCE OF 226.66 FE T LEFT, HAVING: A RAD S CHORD BEARING OF N. THENCE ALONG THE THE END OF SAID CUR N.0 1 045'52 "W., A DiSTAN 103.96 FEET; THENCE N.46° ;THEN P T"' � E �F 3A1D , HENCE NORTH , IS 11.24 FEET- A DISTANCE 4. -E N 69-19 25-W, A LRE F A CURVE TO THE LE OF 30°28'41 ", A F 210.28 FEET; OF 212.78 FEET TO F 81.68 FEET; THENCE ° 22 "W., A DISTANCE OF 1� FEE'r; THENCE N.14 °48'41 "W., A DISTANCE O1 45 014'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF I OZ,95 FEET; THENCE S.89 °46'00" 54 F 63.18 FEET; THENCE 5.44 °46'00 "W.1 A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE S.89 °46'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT. HAVING: A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °48'40% A CHORD BEARING OF S.80 °21'40 "W_ AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET; THENCL ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 74.80 FEET, A CENTRAL. ANGLE OF 52 0221400, A CHORD BEARING OF S.44 046'00 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 66.03 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 68.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 048'40 ", A CHORD HEARING OF S.09 010'20 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET, THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE, THENCE S.00 014'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET; THENCE 5.44 046'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE S.00° 14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 64.82 FEET; THENCE S.44 046100 "W., A DISTANCE OF 5617 FEET; 4OF5 OR: Ot(. . ,. ! 2'711- � , K(� U. , 11J.. THENCE 9.20 °12'10 "W., A DISTANCE OF 25.12 FEET; THENCE S.000 14'00"F. A DISTANCE OF 66.80 FEET; THENCE S.89 °4600 "W., A DISTANCE OF 68,02 FEET; THENCE S.44 046'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE S.00 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE S.44 046'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 91,09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °4840 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.35°21'40 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, IUVINC- A RADIUS OF 74.80 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0012140 ", A C14ORD BEARING OF 9.00014'00 "E. AND A CHORD LENCT14 OF 66.03 FEET,'fNENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENCTH OF 65.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CARVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 9I.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 S °48'40 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.35 049'40 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.45 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET; THENCE S.00 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 16.04%11 ' T_HI WT T945-14100-F-, A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE N.89 °46' S.00 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE 5.00 FEET; THENCE S.00 °1 00 A DISTANCE OF 18.95 FE T; rH THENCE S.45 007'40 "W., DI DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEE ; 1 THENCE 5.00 °07'40 "W., T Of A CURVE TO THE LE %CF- S.47*24'58'E. OF 30003'42 ", A CHORD B FEET; THENCE ALONG TO THE POINT OF COMRADIUS OF 71.25 FEET, AND A CHORD LENT � 76 FEET; THENCE ZTNC OF ANCE OF 20. T; THENCE N.89 °46'00 "E., " ., A DN ST CE OF 20.17 FEET; " S.000OT40 "W., A E OF 16.43 FEET; 's l TkE #DINT OF CURVATURE NG' 0 7 T, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF S.14 °54'11 D ORD LENGTH OF 45.52 OF SAID CUR LENGTH OF 46.05 FEET RVATURE OF TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A A CHORD BEARING OF *rnnNCE ALONG THE ARC O1, SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 43.48 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE 5.00 °07'40 -W,, A DISTANCE OF 44.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 23.88 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, BEARINGS REFER TO AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N.89 °52'20 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Tim PROPER I JEGT TO GA5EMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTfUCTIONS OF RECORD. ` 08/16/2000 STEP B Y, TE OtPEORIDA (L.S. #5296) BBLS SURVEYORS A MAPPERS INC. (L.13. #6753) 99Patlwr PROLWM Ovisr m vB ($BE ATTACHED SKETCH- 9984LS) 5OF5 El i i +'rtirss«ir sw nm ■4flow"» .wcm PM wewtai uw wo. t. plwr M W t% ►cos .,,) VA"m *Awf mm aN rN r l M Kam. • A l CRY a NA ••. Hr...Mlrvwr..w1~wrftw. a .wo KPAKr.wrstRweww"wcw" man .nA.n 44 ,4 rsaw.0 .ir tlt "" """" wr w . " Yrr ra r14p 1H1111tl1 4 a R�.Y11M1 � M MI1R M OMMtt DOOlI�tt♦ LrtY.wl M. ti-M waR Raw w MLP Mm". qam "Mm tt~ 2" am fr�t.Y.+l a -I M1 •.a W.wya wr Ya OOIrLIM1 T/i0rt ' fAM�p► +..rJ1� pit . y( A c OR; 2712 PG; 1324 =wu •a* ft -I 0, rrr..l.n ►aC Mal w (Qwwaul11i Irc.ol nra Q aca.o %Ff W6,16 —eft V901w N E M I I g wIl.. I '' as rt'o• Ieo• r.o- / c, I • • IPO SKETCH N 9 A1 NAVE tCEN RflXx"£IlJ s r THIS IS NOT A SURVEY GENERAL MOM )) K *MM rm 10 W 041 MI IRAMN Of r MtUW'w. riaK VOMW N VVIK ON 0 n l it. a `• a. llrf R R as u)u awn wA" ` 1) t7 w a" vqm wrK4 Mc w K[t r r;trwf %WNW u. —a--- n racer w 1 "bD.n..lxer.v.s v MILK M d 1fi:Jb •) set sell 1 O J fw %me 4.4 c%wa .04 PAC � JY ROi wB9'?tr1�v I31asf SOUIN LAC Ur SEC, X I vP. 48 S, RWA n F. SHEET S� 1 Of s SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRN M Msxmmmm&umwmm COAWAVAYW EAODMMJrf! Isar Is w. wa �a (AUUWM PAUNZ RMFAIKM lEE7 SEMW 24 rOWMWW 48 M"" as "s r "MA PLOMA MIN fMQ 8#11 ISIS -[ 1 OR, 7117 RG, 1175 pguq1 A Y all a� gill a � 110111 git$ y ti H O an� C s x N a � n TM $9 NOT A WRVEY 3 'r s Of J 1 !CgH TO AC. �COWANI� LEQU DESC RNYT +r MKS �vgrm • K4pmm r a. Q*M rA vx Rga�r� EN lq,L�O� L CLNNV1r'Y R MMaE ld r�tS7 rwot pS s olo p"I W Irts I AIA OR: 11.712 PG: 13415 '" DIMENSION SHEET L INE TA ,6L E im Kulw 11frAwt if 7411•Ie10-v .111- Lop Mr/t7ew l37Y LIJ 3111%mmT II J). to 1113" '!JY 1736' Lof 3N•4315ry XM• 1 0 tllye am le 3e lJ rJI711'xT t)}I I.1 111410VYr✓ leer t-3 So )•.J MT mJI' lr WN001 1ttfY t!3 f7!'NJW Jilt]• L NINVY471 MA 13 Me3Y1'N1 .TM' 731 01M03NT rrr 11) •0111•JJT ego I l Mtt7r.IT I Jl• tL wo' lrlr•Y M., Low Sr1.1J•I1T a•7r9 tr �I't1 "NY .1M' 731 MlI M'9ry 1909' tr9 336W if tolr I !• YJ11'rlwT tI )r ail. WMrN•V x11' atw MI•e,49" try at Nt7-1r9JT 0,K' L73 ffMfAIWV /4I• 1w "CovO1i 19.13 IN IJJ•,fl.Y XY' ail. aa,.yri1•V J / /�• rYr J.JwxT 1. JI' u1 rrrlL'1!T (!!r L!1 wrusLV �,Jr tM! ww�Lr uu 1rr a. /vJ•]v1 x.Jr tile, rtNl.9'V ,�.1• a,M «.. •+rnr Ia/I. 717 allrself•V kw l!0 W411!!w Mfr !alit ""Wi!T Jot 61, l/1 01•41 •Iry .1/►• tM r►9t931W "m 1Ih Iwv. "-1 910.' t17 110.'e'IN•v le l3' !et AM 701on ht1• 4 161 M1701MT N 68 4 MJ'l,y)•v /II,' L.r r /arre,T .Lr.• lty M'e!'.r'✓ It14' lV Ml "34,m•✓ Joel, toil 1r'W""I" Xl.r' it" mv1$v_R*v "141' IM wlrl•JI'J/•✓ Agor' aN .n•.txw r1I)' &IM reg•x^Jr✓ 7!e, Wrelwey !flow t03 ri/e'NfST J / »' till ryo•If#Iw Ir fk' tN ra.w". rt.r /M M11•J.'+JT r•Ir trrr 1MwVI•v NIr IN I4W77•frV Ver t./ rtI.347e•V 431.- 4113 See•oglpw LL.r LX .Ire,"'Je•.rY ,file,- tN tMr3rn•V :..r' tit. JM•N Y.'✓ JI.I' 11J w1Y9'tlY 1.•09• too tiC9/•.)T IJAr• 1)1] swl4v" 4 4 0t' (e• Kil7!'31Y etty LM 4Wv9VIT !Ten' 1110 so••w'Nw Ner• I.n *mw -f 19W t7I rAV•3r'1'T ar•r LW' 101071IVT Joel 11b 33410-ll7 !JOY LIt :! 11 tt:1 swifur 60.00' ,!) S..•It:riv I.Ar t� -` 40.1 MJtt• l!!• fA'YfJ1•V 011 Z III 73r'l3']eT /H irJ•!I'rl•✓ I JJ sJJ•nJr•v rirr lr1J' r►Ja• /Z.. . 1 Ir Q ♦ j�- »«� , lY.") LJ 4147 L 10 tr�1 f.e•.e,I" f.. "N*v sr+ww•w 3019• • w a 11 Sa•9•.TJ /Y t M Lr077Ye'( b/o' Tfsp , ry, -Jrlrw /J Ll0 M3 �f0i0T � 1121 1lot Solt. IVY 4e4 'e0'Nw ..gar 14.1 X air M.•Ir.JR H!1' l lJ'I IV]•M'..f IR aY} Y.J •I. wT �.. t 19 Ml't7'A Y 1130 14 M! ]!!!T id J, Litt IW71rs•F uT I n A /r'JJ'rJT 14 Ii6r•f /'rl•V I..r lJf0' / 1 .Irn'J.w I)Ar / tow 'I IV 4491 l4V AMY.VI'1 i'.JYtw•V Ia.J 104 VI r J) rrP9le,r'V M", wlrJ lrY lV /r lIM $Jrl..r✓ x14. I if rr0.11'1VT 'roil too .r11T M' 11.19 w1'r'NT 1093 I N .M'N>•IT .XJr l IeJ1 IIN 111.•I.9rr Air I N 0101IrIO•v lIN M a 00914ty" !A N MI'r.'r7'✓ ri 1.' to •! J' t lJ! W.,. WT .IAJ Ie1 rery•!r4•v re]I• 1 tIN MI•+r1rT Ife.Y 1 N W6,J) K•v nJr l M eJ ll» INYl ery 30.1 111 wI•.a'lIT lee l• y..� l r J'J 3.... r l ltJ► !..•}rrVT M..r "I alt MTrxt'gt'Y r.1+1.71•V 1111' till• 1\ !1 !J tl.ir v� L01 so"Wil It Ir '^ - tlJW mvim •V f0V'1!•N%, oil/ loge, i if, t(N mwvkrT k!f'(!'i►Y MM fie �� 0 Tom` CLAW cJO10 Alr4ro a rf A!N' elTrlr S?Ar .lrar xM N?19*T.T ct !7914 frl)1w ".r 33!19 gap• Aww/7)T CA z Werer lIU3r 04N• 113191 u+rlrlr•✓ r. else, N•l.w• r1sr tier IMVr' M•3111T cT -Xw MrJIN• a)&"- owir 1434- liln 'r/T rd, In 114111117r, ~13, l31b• MI Ir• Srr-9!'Jrr cl /7009 71131.33• Islir f3ltr fxwl- 107.33•10-V cr r JWVV -- nr IV /N Or olltw ay.•}rrw col "or M•Ker• elor• t30r es Pr 3lrvery cx Jepr Jr W.r 9i 3r yaw "or 1..WWV CIO NIr lOYrN• not tw ylr 3N•tl`II-v [K Jl rr• s".0 9 ow]r Xm eau• sry.WT cll 3!71' we, ww ;W 1314 Nlr sl39r(•Nv r). r.r NNF1M jgr• I ?9r n n• e.M Vrw.( to �r�• alrrfr Ka• tour nsr nf•�•rrT cm Jtf3• ]e7 w- .3r' H.e' err- J.JW*VY rm a morA sum" 9!8?JOF3 SKOICH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL QESCRN 7i0M sKs oloVolum s wAprm s- ISMA M AM AWR CONWRVAI7IQIN FAlRMOff SECIMSM TOWM W4rSWW, NAME asEAST COLLIER COUIiR•y FLOWA f &ft4A, PL,1,U„fIMpollsWr l�7 OR; 4088 PG, 0526 . ssl,s SURVEYORS & MAPPERS INC. 1502 -A RAILHEAD BLVD. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 TELEPHONE: 239-597-1315 FAX: (239) 597 -5207 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONSERVATION EASEMENT THE DUNES A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE RUN N.02 012'00 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER FOR A DISTANCE OF 2,637.22 FEET; THENCE RUN S.8 7 °48'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE S.87 048'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.77 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45° 14'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 174.92 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046100 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.84 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.03 014'48 "W., A DISTANCE OF 73.52 FEET; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.52 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 053'38 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 32.95 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.80 °17'59 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 118.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 055'16 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 14.27 FEET AT A BEARING OF S_63 °53'32 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 67.02 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31019'48", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 36.19 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.44 046'00 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 90.83 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 020'06 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 46.00 FEET AT A BEARING OF S. 14-26'03-W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 46.50 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.00 °14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.67 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.00 014'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.45 °14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 146.12 FEET; THENCE RUN S.00 014'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.13 FEET; THENCE RUN S. 89'46'00"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.10 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S. 89046'00"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.84 FEET TO A POINT ON m A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, OF WHICH THE RADIUS = POINT BEARS S.03 014'48 "W., A DISTANCE OF 73.52 FEET; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.52 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 °53'38 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 32.95 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.80 017'59 41W., SHEET 1 OF 13 GRt 4088 PG; 0527 FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 118.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 °55'16 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 14.27 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.63 053'32 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 67.02 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31 °19'48 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 36.19 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.44 046'00 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 90.83 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 °20'06 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 46.00 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.14 °26'03 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 46.50 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.00 014100 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.67 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.00 °1 4'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.69 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 014'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 125.21 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.84 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.03 014'48 "W., A DISTANCE OF 73.52 FEET; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.52 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 °53'38 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 32.95 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.80 °17'59 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 118.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 °55'16 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 14.27 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.63 053'32 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 67.02 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31 °19'48 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 36.19 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.44 046'00 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 90.83 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 °20'06 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 46.00 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.14 °26'03 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 46.50 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.00 °14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.67 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.00 014'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.45 °14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.76 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 74.91 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 °14'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 65.26 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °48'40 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 29.77 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.80 °21'40 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 74.80 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 022'40 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 66.03 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.44 046'00 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 68.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 04814011, SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 29.77 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.0901 0'20"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.91 FEET SHEET 2 OF 13 OR: 4088 PG; 0528 19 TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.00 °14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.000 14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 001'42 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 345.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF TURKEY BAY, THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: RUN N.53 °43'24 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.25 FEET; THENCE RUN N.23 °25'28 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 °08123 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.54 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13 °30'01 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.07 FEET; THENCE RUN N.14 °48'59 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.06 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17 °04'12 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.46 FEET; THENCE RUN N.28 °34'19 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N.07 107'47 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 8.93 FEET; THENCE RUN N.19 °05'51 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.78 FEET; THENCE RUN N.35 038'13 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.61 FEET; THENCE RUN N.46001'1 8"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.98 FEET, THENCE RUN N.49 °02'53 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N.11 °20'03 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22.17 FEET; THENCE RUN N.21 °2622 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22.09 FEET; THENCE RUN N.57 °52'55 "E, FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.46 029'59 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.28 FEET; THENCE RUN N.48 000'36 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,0.62 FEET; THENCE.RUN N.81 °53'01 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF I5.10 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47'29'23 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.94 FEET; THENCE RUN N.54° 14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.04 FEET; THENCE RUN N.38 °49'53 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.54 °2737 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET; THENCE RUN N.44 054'42 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N.37 °5848 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.44 °04'44 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.72 FEET; THENCE RUN N.59 °05'22 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.99 FEET; THENCE RUN S30 °3329 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.63 FEET; THENCE RUN S.75 029'58 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.21 FEET; THENCE RUN S.86 056'07 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.10 FEET; THENCE RUN S.30 °03'58 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.69 FEET; THENCE RUN S.51 °15'17 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.43 °49'39 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.83 FEET; THENCE RUN NA1'55'05"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.38 FEET; THENCE RUN N.30 044'09 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.36 FEET; THENCE RUN S.84 °32'1 5 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.48 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 °1 7'16 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.76 FEET; THENCE RUN N.82'07'03 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.37 °27'52 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.72 FEET; THENCE RUN N.52 °04'16 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 9.92 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47 009'29 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.46 FEET; THENCE RUN N.24 001'37 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17 °49'41 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 15.39 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08 °33'57 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.13 FEET; THENCE RUN N. 52'4647"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.13 FEET; THENCE RUN N.60 °45'23 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.17 FEET; THENCE RUN S.72 03659 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.83 FEET; THENCE RUN S.87 059'27 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.72 FEET; THENCE RUN N.67 °49'10 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N.34 °48'19 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.78 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02 °48'30 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.05 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 °09'25 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.15 FEET; THENCE RUN S.85 °55'09 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.49 FEET; THENCE RUN N.26 °44'00 "E, FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.70 011150 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.79° 18'20 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.28 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 04629 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF SHEET 3 OF 13 OR: 4088 PG: 0529 26.64 FEET; THENCE RUN N.22 °08'34 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.36 FEET; THENCE RUN N.20 027'04 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.40 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00 024'47 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22.84 FEET; THENCE RUN S.68 °52'11 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.79 FEET; THENCE RUN N.79 126'18 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.85 FEET; THENCE RUN N.4114611 I "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 °54'28 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.83 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 003'08 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.25 FEET; THENCE RUN N.40 022'14 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.66 FEET; THENCE RUN N.19 011123 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.23 FEET; THENCE RUN N.50 °59'41 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.55 FEET; THENCE RUN N.16 °38'04 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.78 FEET; THENCE RUN N.12 °47' 11 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.12 FEET; THENCE RUN N.20 013'09 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.02 FEET; THENCE RUN N.26 052'59 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08018118 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.09 049'20 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.36 FEET; THENCE RUN N.42 019'09 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.13 FEET; THENCE RUN N.57 °50'19 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.57 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 °40'24 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.80 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 °38'51 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.59 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 022'36 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.61 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17°31'l6 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.57 FEET; THENCE RUN N.18 °5744 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.49 FEET; THENCE RUN N.09 °21'34 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.88 FEET; THENCE RUN N.I I °28'29 ".E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.23 FEET; THENCE RUN N.03"24'1 TV. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.06 °1 5'34 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.79 FEET; THENCE RUN N.60 113'30 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.83 FEET; THENCE RUN N.57 °4831 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 58.41 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 °22'1 9 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 66.95 FEET; THENCE RUN S.41 053'32 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.62 FEET; THENCE RUN S.78 057'53 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.50 FEET; THENCE RUN S.65 016155 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.60 FEET; THENCE RUN S.76 007124 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.42 FEET; THENCE RUN N.82 120155 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.10 FEET; THENCE RUN S.66 026'20 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.14'FEET; THENCE RUN N.77 °18'12" E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.27 FEET; THENCE RUN S.72 °14'30 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.23 FEET; THENCE RUN S.72 °13'16 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.92 FEET; THENCE RUN S.83'1 6'58"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.89 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 146'28 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.34 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 044'38 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 030'14 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.47 FEET; THENCE RUN N.71 °52'47 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.48 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17 °02'46 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.92 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02 017142 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.88 FEET; THENCE RUN N.43 °47'04 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.77 FEET; THENCE RUN N.15 °06'12 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.91 FEET; THENCE RUN N.26 055'14 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.50 019'41 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.73 FEET; THENCE RUN N.41 135'46 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13 °5643 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.08 FEET; THENCE RUN N.30 °06'14 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.89 FEET; THENCE RUN N.51 °55'32 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.20 FEET; THENCE RUN N.34 049'44 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.90 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04018'41 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.77 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00 148146 "W FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N.27 °28'10 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.87 FEET; THENCE RUN N.06 127110 11E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.19 FEET; THENCE RUN N.24 °37'15 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.76 FEET; THENCE RUN N.42 048'37 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.92 FEET; THENCE RUN SHEET 4 OF 13 OR: 4088 PG: 0530 N.19 °29'] 2 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.19 FEET; THENCE RUN N. 10032'20"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.58 FEET; THENCE RUN N.0201 1'06"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.95 FEET; THENCE RUN N.12 °54'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 57.96 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 °45132 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.66 FEET; THENCE RUN N.30 001'13 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.78 FEET; THENCE RUN N.59 035'48 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.95 FEET; THENCE RUN N.84 °03'15 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 56.08 FEET; THENCE RUN 5.86 °34'26 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.01 FEET; THENCE RUN S.67 °30'47 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.88 FEET; THENCE RUN S.75 °58'32 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.79 FEET; THENCE RUN S.83 020'33 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.89 FEET; THENCE RUN S.86 °27'1 8 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.48 FEET; THENCE RUN N.86 100130 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.15 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 135'05 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 54.64 FEET; THENCE RUN N.22 059'43 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.04 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08'03'1 8"E, FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.02 FEET; THENCE RUN N.06 034'08 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.42 FEET; THENCE RUN N.19 °19'37 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.90 FEET; THENCE RUN N.11 °24'23 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.36 FEET; THENCE RUN N.28 027'03 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N.51 °09'09 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.24 FEET; THENCE RUN N.78 044'02 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22.91"FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 °05'37 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.42 FEET; THENCE RUN N.69 007'24 "E. FOR A DIS'T'ANCE OF 28.98 FEET, THENCE RUN S.83 °11'51 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.90 FEET; THENCE RUN N.74 °4429 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.17 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 024158 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.73 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13 °3629 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.92 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08 038'51 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.46 FEET; THENCE RUN N.71 014'33 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.97 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 901 (VANDERBILT DRIVE), SAID POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A"; THENCE LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, RUN S.02 012'25 "E. ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,202.28 FEET; THENCE RUN S.02 012'00 "E., ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 292.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 33.43 ACRES, MORE OR LESS AND COMMENCE AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "A ", THE SAME BEING A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, THENCE RUN - N.02 °12'25 "W. ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.30 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, THE SAME BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: RUN N.86 °12'30 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 54.35 FEET; THENCE RUN N.75 °3242 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.74 FEET; THENCE RUN N.55 °33'14 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 73.96 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 °16'27 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.34 FEET; THENCE RUN N.33 057'49 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.03 FEET; THENCE RUN N.50 029'17 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.46 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "B ", THENCE LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, RUN N.87 048'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 177.85 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE RUN S.02 °12'25 "E. ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT SHEET 5 OF 13 OR: 4088 PG: 0531 OF WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 126.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 0.38 ACRES, MORE OR LESS AND COMMENCE AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "B ", THENCE RUN S.87 048'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.77 FEET TO SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, THE SAME BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: RUN S.31 155'04 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23,74 FEET; THENCE RUN S.04 °55'25 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 42.56 FEET; THENCE RUN S.25 056'24 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.27 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °15'07 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.90 FEET; THENCE RUN S.57 049119 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.83 FEET; THENCE RUN S.24 °48'50 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.25 FEET; THENCE RUN S.17 °1337 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.80 FEET; THENCE RUN S.40 °3 5'11 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.08. FEET; THENCE RUN S.23 026'40 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.38 FEET; THENCE RUN S.61 035'32 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.59 FEET; THENCE RUN S.59 °51'23 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.14 FEET; THENCE RUN S.32 °25'29 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.13 FEET; THENCE RUN S.30 °06'18 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.62 FEET; THENCE RUN S.15 °03'39 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.08 FEET; THENCE RUN S.11 °18'16 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.50 FEET; THENCE RUN S.10 °13'44 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.92 FEET; THENCE RUN N.82 °33'14 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.85 FEET; THENCE RUN N.46 009'53 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.05 FEET; THENCE RUN N.85 104'58 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.76 122'29 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.24 FEET; THENCE RUN N.44 058'05 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.39 FEET; THENCE RUN N.41 017'38 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.10 FEET; THENCE RUN N.58 035'29 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.29 FEET; THENCE RUN N.62'13 1'58"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.96 FEET; THENCE RUN N.41 °00'50 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.01 °44'58 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.89 FEET; THENCE RUN N.23 059'36 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.34 FEET; THENCE RUN N.03 040'12 "E. FOR A DIS'T'ANCE OF 19.71 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 °07'56 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.84 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02 °44'49 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08 046'34 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.41 FEET; THENCE RUN N.18 °52'52 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.31 01 1'40"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.22 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.50 FEET; THENCE RUN N.50 °04114 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.51 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "C ", THENCE LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE RUN N.87 048'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 280.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 1.11 ACRES, MORE OR LESS AND COMMENCE AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "C ", THENCE RUN S.87 048'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 179.97 FEET TO SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, THE SAME BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: RUN S.27 °34'19 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 8.98 FEET; THENCE RUN S.58 047'25 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.11 FEET; THENCE RUN S.78 °05'25 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.89 FEET; SHEET 6 OF 13 OR: 4088 PG; 0532 THENCE RUN S.49 052'56 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.16 FEET; THENCE RUN S.18 °13'21 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.52 FEET; THENCE RUN S.32103'07 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.90 FEET; THENCE RUN S.54 053116 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 103.42 FEET; THENCE RUN S.70 030'41 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.78 FEET; THENCE RUN S.56 °44'50 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.21 FEET; THENCE RUN S.429 8'16"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.82 FEET; THENCE RUN S.14 047'17 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.59 FEET; THENCE RUN S.08 °1 1'59 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.54 FEET; THENCE RUN S.34 °00'59 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.40 FEET; THENCE RUN S.14 °2737 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.52 FEET; THENCE RUN S.36 °44'54 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 100.01 FEET; THENCE RUN S.04 059'31 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.76 FEET; THENCE RUN S.15 °41'46 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.87 FEET; THENCE RUN S.18 °57'41 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 64.40 FEET; THENCE RUN S.22 °2356 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.15 FEET; THENCE RUN S.06 °28'15 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22.44 FEET; THENCE RUN S.34 °23'53 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.33 FEET; THENCE RUN S.43 052'17 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 2597 FEET; THENCE RUN S.30 031'30 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 73.07 FEET; THENCE RUN SAP35'04 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.62 FEET; THENCE RUN S.28 °03'44 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 91.30 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °05'20 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.59 FEET; THENCE RUN S.11°12'03 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.80 FEET; THENCE RUN S.38 029'31 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N.54043'53 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.67 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 048'34 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.46 FEET; THENCE RUN N.59 °5522 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.46 FEET; THENCE RUN S.73 041'07 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.02 FEET; THENCE RUN S.84 °20'32 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.88 FEET; THENCE RUN N.74 023'08 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.52 FEET; THENCE RUN N.61 °00'46 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47 104'26 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.22 FEET; THENCE RUN N.58 °38`48 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 72.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.48 °1 7'26 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.01 FEET; THENCE RUN NAV51'19 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 4.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.54 052'37 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.39 FEET; THENCE RUN N.46 001'38 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.52 FEET; THENCE RUN N.30 °23'38 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.43 FEET; THENCE RUN N.29 049`35 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.51 °39'13 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 81.63 FEET; THENCE RUN N.09 1103120 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.83 FEET; THENCE RUN N.53 018'21 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 61.49 FEET; THENCE RUN N.21045'05 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.23 FEET; THENCE RUN N.49 048'43 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.86 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 °25'58 "W, FOR A DISTANCE OF 66.78 FEET; THENCE RUN S.66 137'12 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.15 FEET; THENCE RUN N.89'13'1 5"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.23 FEET; THENCE RUN N.48 042'41 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.94 FEET; THENCE RUN N.57 °46'47 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 96.81 FEET; THENCE RUN N.78 °35135 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.14 FEET; THENCE RUN N.56 153'01 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.57 FEET; THENCE RUN N.68 10936 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.39 FEET; THENCE RUN N.80 °1 8'49 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.62 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 007'08 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.64 FEET; THENCE RUN N.69049'42 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.76 FEET; THENCE RUN S.71 "I5'50 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.11 FEET; THENCE RUN S.74 016'02 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.71 FEET; THENCE RUN S.84 °15126 11W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 68.86 FEET; THENCE RUN S.88 °22'21 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.51 FEET; THENCE RUN S.70 026'20 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.20 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 010'47 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.63 FEET; THENCE RUN S.71 028118 "W. SHEET 7 OF 13 0 OR: 4488 PG: 0533 FOR A DISTANCE OF 29,13 FEET; THENCE RUN S.68 033'33 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.34 FEET; THENCE RUN N.82 025'53 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.99 FEET; THENCE RUN N.35 052127 "W_ FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.58 FEET; THENCE RUN N.25 042'42 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.16 °38'09 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.74 FEET; THENCE RUN N.27 024'57 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.56 FEET; THENCE RUN N. 13024'22"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N. 17'42'30"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.88 FEET; THENCE RUN N.36 °48'52 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.31 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 055'56 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 65.07 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13 044'12 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.55 FEET; THENCE RUN N.38 037'08 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.55 FEET; THENCE RUN N.62 036'52 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.77 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, RUN N.87 °48'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,628.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 20.48 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. TOTAL AREA OF PARCEL DESCRIBED IS 55.40 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST AS BEING N.02 012'00 "W. THIS: IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESE CATIONS OF. RECORD. r, 05/29/06 STEPti E. BAR Y' -STATE OF FLORIDA, (L.S. #5296) BBL} .�ORVEY;ORS;, MAPPERS INC., (L.B. #6753) pROOi BY COi. : PS/2.7/06 REVi•E E,S IS 8g: : (SEE ATTACHED SKETCH'S - SHEETS 9 OF 13 THROUGH 13 OF 13) SHEET 9 OF 13 i� • • UK: guou r (j: u9s4 N W 0 go- E Q S SCALE! I" - 400' 0 ZOO' 400' THIS EXHIHIT HAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED P.O.C. POINT "C" P.O.C. A, L DOUCHERIY CO., &C_, (SEE SHEET 12 OF 13) POINT "B" A CORPORATION (SEE SHEET 12 OF 13) 610 PACE 7174- 1178) P.O.S. P.O.B. tSEE f 13)7 t 6 (SEE SHEET 12 OF 13) P.O.H. (SEE SHEET 12 O.C. OF 13) P. 4 POINT ,A.. (SEE SHEET 12 of 13) i' i FIELD LOCATED MEAN HIGH HATER LINE ,t LI£VAniW ; 1 -40' 11CW 1929 - PRO14D£D 9Y TH£ _ DEPARTMENT O£ _ £N14RONAf£NTAL PROTECTION •�` i fr � x� r� .; 21 if P.O.B. ` (SEE SHEET 10 OF 13) .S SRT'46•DO'V 2 �` SA00' P. 0. C. SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE C SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF 7 WNSNP 48 SOUTH. RANGEC 25RTEAS. i �. CONSERVATION EASEMENT 55.401 ACRES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA_ (SEA SHEET 10 2� 21 29 a S NOTES: g LEGEND THESSOUTHEAST OUARTEREOF SECTION 20,HTOtYNSHIP 4BOF POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH, RANGE 25 CAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, 4 P.O.C. POIN7 OF COMMENCEMENT 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS iS DR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. g P.B- PLAT BOOR 3 -) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS R O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS THEREOF. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SHEET 9 OF 13 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION DSLS SURVEYORS A MAP'S INC, N 8 CONSERVATION EASEMENT A PORTION OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. & A SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST ti o o COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NAALgS ,FLDA10A3411p(2J9) 5p7.1315 L4 0 L364 1,365 20 A U° UK; Md YU; U)J) + Lan LINE TABLE 1,3 D2 - y •'� i,• LINE TABLE CL1PV£ Cl RADIUS LLN!',TN T3.52' DELTA CNAPD CNWD 1J£ARIN5' L39 i ' INE DEAR7AC LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH C3 LMC TABLE 31'19-48- N C4 90.03' 46.50' 3649' 144'46W'Ll 29.20'06' 46.00' 349 S02'lZ'w'C 1192.09 L369 544.46'00'V 16.43 CJNE SEARING LENGTH 6.57"16' 1427' S6333'3P'V K, /� 3B CO 350 I SB7'4B'00'V 4077 0370 589.46'00•✓ 4881 L389 N17'64le'E 13.46 e 380 C10 3323' 11823' 74.20' 115'53'38' 3493' S80.17'59'V 6.53'16' 331 N45.14'00•V 17492 L371 50014'00'£ 49.67 1,390 N28'N 19£ 11,63 „, E t9'20v6' 4.400' 514'116'03'✓ S89.46,LV,V 63.18 L372 S4446.00•V 16.43 L391 N07.0747f 8,93 LINE TABL', 3S3 S44'46'08'V 16.43 L373 S0D14'V0'E 6318 L39P N/9'OS'Sf £ 19.70 S 1411 575'29'58£ ea?l L4P7 L426 NS$46'47'V 354 M 46'00•V 4804 L374 S45.14'00'£ 6A,76 L393 N35.30'13'E 1961 L {30 S7••'S9' 85 Ltf6 2035 1,353 500'1400 £ 4167 I -373 S44'46'00'V 74.91 1,394 Ns6•D1'1B'E lP.�B SCALE: H41'SJ'OS'£ 11.38 1,417 N30.44'09'£ 26.36 1,433 N34'48'l9'V NOP•4810'E 11.78 4355 S44.46'00'V 16.43 C376 N431400'V 65.26 L395 N49.0233E 10.62 M49 14J0.59'41C 11955 L43P NI6.38'0 L42D 7182'0703'E 1116 L337 S001400'£ 6210 L377 S09"46'OD'V 63,18 L396 NI12003£ 22.J7 0 100' 200' 1,439 N79'I6'20'£ 24.PB WD1309127 10011 1,453 N2b'S259'E 1,338 5431400'E 14642 L37B S44.46'00•6, 16.43 L297 NPl•P6'P2'E 2x09 THIS Exnl8li MAY LEGEND L359 S0074'00 £ 23,13 L379 589.46 A0'V 5849 L398 N37.5273'E 16.97 HAVE BEEN REDUCED 55 -404 ACRES 1.) BEARINGS REFER Id TO THE EAST L360 S89'46'00'V 1670 L30D S0014'00£ SQ 4.0 L4W N46.29S91- $3 2) THrS PROPERTY IS SUBJ`_CT TO EA5EMENTS• RESERVATIONS? O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS OR RESTRICTIONS OF L36J S44'4600'V 16.43 L381 S44.46'00'V 16,43 L4p0 N48.00'36'E 10" lObP ANO DECIMALS L36P S89'46'00'V 4684 L382 S00'14'00'E 6316 L401 7.91.53011E 1510 L363 5001400'£ 4867 L389 NT3.Ol'42'V 34551 L402 N47'P9'P3'E 29,94 m m L364 S44'46'p0'V 16.43 L301 N33'4324'V ?023 L403 N54'J4'00'E 12.04 h .SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST 7502 -A RAIL HEAD 9LYD. L365 S00WW'E 33A9 L383 N23.2328'V 12.65 L404 H38149159'£ JB.3t NAPLES, FLORIDA 34170 (239) SO7.1315 L.1" S444600'V 47.97 L396 A94'08£3'V 17.54 1,403 N54.27'37'E 2259 L367 N45J4 00'V I27PJ L387 M13.3001'V 17-07 L406 N44'54'42'£ e"z L368 SN9'46'00'V 6316 L390 A14.48.59'V 7.06 L407 N37'30'49'£ 2053 i t / L448 . V44'04'44'£ , 111.72 $E SHE T ]}, QF ] A 1 -0F 13 ■ 14 jS . r L431 L450 •A ' LS33 �i 0418 / ' L R 'l f /�, 1,956 P.O.B. LI{ .HEL 1. --" L95r L44 �!6 -' .6V .78+ x� L44P 445 P ED Y. ,• 1,338 S07;W0'V . III PICT % 00 ^! L43 440- £ 4R 1,43 L433 360' L4321 L4 2S' L363 P O 1 �. L4 0 L364 1,365 20 A U° `' 29 28 L 4oi '' t� ; -% : • Lan CURVE TABLE 1,3 D2 - y •'� i,• L �- CL1PV£ Cl RADIUS LLN!',TN T3.52' DELTA CNAPD CNWD 1J£ARIN5' L39 i 1,373 C2 3323' /1527' 14.2Q• 25.53.30' 3293' S00.1739'V 615316' 14.27' SA3-53'32'V C3 67.w 26.63' 31'19-48- C4 90.03' 46.50' 3649' 144'46W'Ll 29.20'06' 46.00' 1,39 3 . *' h 6 3' SJ4•P6'03'V 23.33'38' 3293' 580 J7'3s'L, 317 _ ,6y v C7 710P3' N.2R' .47.02' 6.57"16' 1427' S6333'3P'V K, /� 3B CO 3(.63' 9463' 31'19'48' 3619' S44'16.00v C9 46.50' 73511' P95p0'06• 4610' 314'26'03'✓ .-% 380 C10 3323' 11823' 74.20' 115'53'38' 3493' S80.17'59'V 6.53'16' Cll 67112' 36.65' 14,27 S63.5T3iN 31'19.48• 36JY X44'46'DO•V 02 1,382 C13 9003' 4650' 91,09' t9'20v6' 4.400' 514'116'03'✓ C14 119.91' 74.00' 68.38• 18,48.40' 119.77• AV Zl'40'V 511'2240' 6643' S44.4600•V V Cf3 91.49' 29.9!' 10'48'40' 29.77' S0970'P0'V 5' LINE TABL', LINE BEARING LENGTI4 LINE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE L409 N5910512P [ 11.99 1.410 530.3329'£ 11.63 4426 REARING NOB'33'37'V LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH 1411 575'29'58£ ea?l L4P7 L426 NS$46'47'V 11.13 1213 L4f3 N0024'47T 2EN4 L444 Lilt SR6.36'07'E 111.10 L4Z9 H60.45p3'V 1777 S68'52'11£ 31.79 L445 H79'26•£ L413 369 11 UN L {30 S7••'S9' 85 Ltf6 2035 29311 1,413 L431 S87.5.9'27'V 14.72 L447 N43•S4 P8'V 23.83 ? N43- 49'39'£ 19.83 L 416 K67.4"0'V 1432 1366 C448 Nf0.0.7'08'E 26.27 H41'SJ'OS'£ 11.38 1,417 N30.44'09'£ 26.36 1,433 N34'48'l9'V NOP•4810'E 11.78 L449 N40.22'14'V PA66 1,418 58132'13£ 2648 L434 NO4.092.7'E 110175 32.1s L450 N19'JJ 23E 27,23 L451 L419 589'1776'£ JJ.76 L436 L437 SBS'S3.09'V M49 14J0.59'41C 11955 L43P NI6.38'0 L42D 7182'0703'E 1116 N26.44'00'E 117,01 {� 27.78 3 L433 NJP471f'V L4P1 N372752'V 16,7E 1,436 N7071'SO'£ 29.27 34x2 Yg L434 L422 N32'041i'V 9,911 1,439 N79'I6'20'£ 24.PB WD1309127 10011 1,453 N2b'S259'E L423 N47'09.29'V 1046 1,424 A2f'O7'37•V L440 N04.4629'E 1,441 KPP•0N'34'V 116,64 PSOI L436 N0B'JB'78•V 272r 28.07 1,425 NIT49'4l'V 1339 1,442 N2C•2704'V 4336 2040 1,457 AV9'49'2p'V J &36 i L156 LEGEND N4219'09'V 11713 " L 459 H57.30'19'61 4657 P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING CONSERVATION EASEMENT NOTES; P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 55 -404 ACRES 1.) BEARINGS REFER Id TO THE EAST P.B. PLAT BOOK LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST $ QUARTER OF SECTION 20. PCs, PAGES $3 2) THrS PROPERTY IS SUBJ`_CT TO EA5EMENTS• RESERVATIONS? O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 3.) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET THIS IS NOT A SURVEY THEREOF. ANO DECIMALS SHEET 10 OF 13 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTIQN CONSERVATION EASEMENT &BLS SURVEYORS 4 MAP'S INC. " m m A PORTION OF h .SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST 7502 -A RAIL HEAD 9LYD. a COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NAPLES, FLORIDA 34170 (239) SO7.1315 1� L VA; tVOG ru; VJJO P.O -C. JOINT "A" ;CE SHEET 12 OF 13) LEGEND SEE SHEET 10 E)F'13''''''. P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING NOTES, P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 1.) BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST P.D. PEAT BOOK QUARTER OF SECTION 20. D,R, OFFICIAL RECORDS 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS. RESERVATIONS CONSERVATION EASEMENT OR RESTRICIONS OF RECORD. 55.401 ACRES 3,) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. c THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SHEET 11 OF 13 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION BBLS SURVEYORS &MAP'S INC. m � n CONSERVATION EASEMENT Y A PON77ON OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANCTE 25 EAST NAPLE$ FLORIDA $1170 (239) 507 -T3fs o a COI LfER COUNTY, FLORIDA LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE N LINE SEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH L348 S02'12?SE IPAat0 1,474 S63'16'55E 40.60 L499 N75'06 ]2N 17.91 W' g L460 1�4.40•P4'V 04.00 L475 776'0724'£ Z4A2 LI90 Nt'67.5•N'f 21,27 L 461 A00.30'3J'V 1559 L476 NO2.203Yf 26,10 L491 11,7679'411£ 2573 Ls6P NJ9.22'96E 31,61 L477 S6be620 E 1944 L498 N41195`461C 20.32 s L463 N)7'3176'£ 3157 L470 N77'J672E 2527 L493 N13'56'431C 1808 1,464 AFIS- 57'44T 3t49 L479 S72 J430'C 31,29 L494 N30.06'14'£ 8509 SCALE: 1" 200• L465 M791-1134 'r 27.00 L400 S72 J316'Y 87.92 L495 NSl'55'32E 1220 11111 1 1466 Nf1•[0'29'£ 4123 L481 S837698'E 29.89 L4M N34 "49'44'£ K90 O [DD' 20V L467 M3'Z417'V 7877 L4S2 709'16'1'0'£ 51.31 L497 AG(JO'Il'[ Rt77 TH[E L46B NO615,'94E 4279 {489 N73.1190E 17.75 {498 Ag740'K'V 27.6p MAY L 469 A6013'30E 27.83 4484 N1S'30'14'V 29,47 L499 N27'PO'!OE SL07 HAVE BECK REDUCED MEN R L470 N57'(8.31'F 5841 L(05 N7I"M47'V !1148 L500 AVde7'JOY 3719 L471 A45'22'19'£ 6695 L499 Nl7.OP46'V 1).92 L301 N24.3713 E 2576 L472 S4111T3'32£ 19.62 L07 AW*,rr4P'f CAM 450E N4P'10971C 2592 (473 S7877'53'£ 1450 L488 N4947'04'V Za 77 L503 N19e9J21V 10J9 P.O -C. JOINT "A" ;CE SHEET 12 OF 13) LEGEND SEE SHEET 10 E)F'13''''''. P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING NOTES, P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 1.) BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST P.D. PEAT BOOK QUARTER OF SECTION 20. D,R, OFFICIAL RECORDS 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS. RESERVATIONS CONSERVATION EASEMENT OR RESTRICIONS OF RECORD. 55.401 ACRES 3,) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. c THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SHEET 11 OF 13 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION BBLS SURVEYORS &MAP'S INC. m � n CONSERVATION EASEMENT Y A PON77ON OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANCTE 25 EAST NAPLE$ FLORIDA $1170 (239) 507 -T3fs o a COI LfER COUNTY, FLORIDA I" e i.nn• nrrur_nt-_Llevf mgACRE COHSE* EASEMENT �� 55.401 ACRES LEGEND NOTES; P.O.B. POINT OF BECINNINC I.) BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT QUARTER OF SECTION 20. UK: iube rte: u5J i 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, AESERVATIOtt OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. S Lr3 LINE TABLE THIS IS NarA SURVEY LINE TABLE SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DE'SCRIP770N w CONSERVATION EASEMENT LINE u FEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH LP9 AL94.43'3.YV Le rar3+�yv era $=*4rR3'V 3cu LLr saeua!•v 3P54 AW 3' S'EP"V 3346 LJ ry 39A9 L13 us .734 o9 39•v S141E"7•V r34o 29.60 L35 41 LS 4#'&- S4l3236'V 2936 US S36•4434•V 26.32 101{0! L37 AWYW261V L6 Ste•I]' ;!'V 4652 Ll6 SO4 39'912, @7,76 _ �A�: 1- - YOp' am L? $92'03'07'£ 4190 55437'!! £ JIM40 07 365'41'467" MV; 6339 L4r to SM J041T 34.78 L18 L1! v &,sr41'E sews s62 64,40 2573 O !00• 200• MR'49'95'V L9 $36'4430 [ 2RPl Lr0 SA6 2873.1 2.44 IREDUEEE LL93 LIO 542.7&76•£ 3182 LPl S94'P9"J9•V 2533 HAVE OEEN L3a LH S14.4777 F 9659 4w $19.3277'1 2597 Lll& I" e i.nn• nrrur_nt-_Llevf mgACRE COHSE* EASEMENT �� 55.401 ACRES LEGEND NOTES; P.O.B. POINT OF BECINNINC I.) BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT QUARTER OF SECTION 20. P.B. PLAT BOOT, O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, AESERVATIOtt OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. S Lr3 3.) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMAL$ THEREOF. THIS IS NarA SURVEY L16 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DE'SCRIP770N D CONSERVATION EASEMENT V ; $ SECTION A PORTION OF 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 FAST v COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LINE TABLE LINE BEARING I Emu TH LP3 S30•b'31Y1 7307 L24 S41*."V*v 27.62 Lr3 SEOW44 -V 9190 L16 54411120.60 9639 Lr7 SII•JPy3'v mum Lm 59e 2ravv 49.61 LP9 AL94.43'3.YV 3,.67 L-W N73.4&'94'V 26.46 L91 AW 3' S'EP"V 3346 LW S73.41'07'V 3504 LN Se4'ZPW'V 29.60 L35 N74 -&jW -V ELEZ L26 AW'00'46'V 446, L37 AWYW261V 471, L3& NS&78.4ry 7173 L3! Mi&7r26-V am L40 AM1'3179'V 142 141 144'Sp'?J'V 6339 L4r N46'019&•V 315& L44 N30•r3'3" 3843 US MR'49'95'V P.f73 146 N31 9973'1 &LL3 L47 A09•&377-V LL93 L40 IlS3'1&21'V 61.49 L49 M-4sv" W3 L3a N49'48'43'V 34AM L02 Iwr..(Rv 'F !62464 Lll& 59135W7/ '174 LIIP 504.3325-V 4016 L1r0 $,3".7624'1 3427 1121 S4473'07V 2590 L1ZP SS749•J9'V L—,,7 UPI SP4407RV ,913 L1P4 M743'37'V 14AW LJE5 S40.317/'V 130& UM 5P3'P644'V 2839 "" S6l'33W -V 47.59 L128 S39'31'RJ'V 2814 L12! S3R'23'29'V )713 L1,40 S30VAnry 2562 L131 513.0!'3!•1 210& Ll9$ SIl •lB'16'E CL50 LJ33 $10'13'44•V R19P U34 N&P'3374'V 1345 L1J3 N46'0f7YV I&05 L136 AWW'SrV 3-27 LJ37 N76•F1.29'V �Y4 L13e N413B'03v 4139 L139 1Nl'1r30T tiro L740 NS&•31'P9TF '9,29 L141 A16P9J3&7; PL% LJ4R AVl'O0'S0T ,7.97 L142 A01'44WT $Aft U44 N'33!•36T 2134 LUS Aw407R'E an Lt44 IIYG'07'36'v 23 64 L147 NW-444!•V 1706 LJ48 AV&46'34 -V 1441 LJ49 Nl&'SP3!•V -ar7 U10 N9171'40•v 1832 LIS! N'r•46 60'1 2640 LISP NSO'0474'V 34.31 1133 NW- 48'ArE !8066 4154 M9678'J -V S4.35 LJ35 Ar73'L'4r-v 3574 LJ56 N33'3314'V 71% L157 A"1677-V 3334 L15& N33'3T49'V r4W LJ39 JL502!'17'V 40.46 LI" M9r4&'00•c 177.&$ L161 SD27r -m E 126.33 L134 Ade•tp-PSV 4190 SHEET 12 OF 13 BBL$ SURVEYORS & MAPS INC_ 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. NApLE3, FLORIDA - 1"10039) $97 -015 0 _4 X S^ \ \\ R£LD LOCATED MEAN fi �• HIGH WATER LINE ��yyyy 60, £L EVA EION - 1.40' NCVD 1929 L PROWCLID BY THE q \ DEPARTMENT OF v ENyRONMENTAL PROTECTION o \. 1.63 e L64 \ L9 66 ;\ 6 L71 \ L7P x>;x OR: 4088 PG: 0538 *x x ",A,/ m )R SCALE I- = Zoo- loo, 200, THIS EXHIBIT MAY NAVE BEEN REDUCED LEGEND P.O.B. POINT OF BECINNINC P.Q.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT P.B. PLAT BOCK O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS EmCONSERVATION EASEMENT 55.40# ACRES THIS IS NC N � � tl O o 4 Q i° NOTES: I) BEARINCS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 70, 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 3.) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF, )TA SURVEY SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET' 13 OF 13 $ CONSERVATION EASEMENT B9L5 SUgVEYC1R5 8 MAP1S INC. r A PORTION OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAP BLVD. SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE .25 EAST a COLLIER COUNTY FLORlDQ NAPLES, FLORMA 34110 (239) U7.1316 LINE TABLE LINE TABLE LINE' BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH L51 L52 S89•PS'58'V S66.37'1P'V 66.78 L68 ST1'P878'W P913 L53 NB4'13'13"V 3115 3823 L69 L70 S68'33'33'V 21.34 L54 N48'42'41'W 31.94 L71 NB2'c5'J3'V 38.99 L5S NST'{6'IT'V 9681 L79 N35'5227'V 5%58 L56 N76'35'35'V 3L14 NPS'4142'1 3897 L37 NS6'S30!'61 31.57 L73 L74 N1612010911.0 3374 L59 N68109'36 'V 23.39 LTS N272457'V 36.56 L59 NBO'18'44'V 34,6E 176 N13'P422'V ,.'A 715 L60 S89'07'ae'V 2x.64 L77 N17'42'30'V SRBB L6! N69y9' {g�W 33.76 L78 N36.4B'SE'V 4¢31 L62 S7d'1530'V 3A11 L79 WO'SS'S6'V 65.07 Lb3 S74'J6'04'V 24,71 LBO N13'I47P'V S1S5 L64 SB4'15'P6'W 60,86 L81 N38.3TOB'V P955 L65 SB8'2P'47'V 52.51 L92 N62'36'32'W AL87.48'00 E 1577 L66 S7a'26 2O'V PI.Pa 1648.84 L67 S44'la'47'6, P5.63 _4 X S^ \ \\ R£LD LOCATED MEAN fi �• HIGH WATER LINE ��yyyy 60, £L EVA EION - 1.40' NCVD 1929 L PROWCLID BY THE q \ DEPARTMENT OF v ENyRONMENTAL PROTECTION o \. 1.63 e L64 \ L9 66 ;\ 6 L71 \ L7P x>;x OR: 4088 PG: 0538 *x x ",A,/ m )R SCALE I- = Zoo- loo, 200, THIS EXHIBIT MAY NAVE BEEN REDUCED LEGEND P.O.B. POINT OF BECINNINC P.Q.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT P.B. PLAT BOCK O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS EmCONSERVATION EASEMENT 55.40# ACRES THIS IS NC N � � tl O o 4 Q i° NOTES: I) BEARINCS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 70, 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 3.) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF, )TA SURVEY SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET' 13 OF 13 $ CONSERVATION EASEMENT B9L5 SUgVEYC1R5 8 MAP1S INC. r A PORTION OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAP BLVD. SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE .25 EAST a COLLIER COUNTY FLORlDQ NAPLES, FLORMA 34110 (239) U7.1316 f 2678361 OR: 2712 PIG; 16346 Q90 Qf-QQN5ERYAT1QN EA.9 Iu�n1T THIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASE ME�fi `'��-� 'v_pnt this ' 24th of July ! 20040 by Vanderbilt Partners `I, Ltd. day (address) 5551 Ridgewood Drive Sg3 e2a3 Naples, FL 34108 ('Grantor) to the South Florida Water Management District ( "Grantee'). As used herein, the term Grantor shall include any and all heirs, successors or assigns pf the Ordwor, and all subttectuent owners of the 'Property' (as hereinafter defined) and the term Grantee shall Include any successor or mignee of Gfdntee. WHEREAS, the Grantor Florida, and more specifically/' herein ( "PropaW); and / Q WHEREAS, the Q/an The Durres which Is subject to the r gul ('District "); and WHEREAS, Dist activities which affect su WITNESSETH nds situated in collierGounty, in Exhi - chvd hereto and incorporated of rojecq � sit ur col y, ri a 1}U Management District it No. 98 t 0o Permit ") authorizes ceridin \ trs in or of the Stat V`J da, and WHEREAS, this Permit cantor preserve and/or mitigate wetlands under the District's jurisdictl WHEREAS, the Grantor has developed and propo5ea as part of the perm i conditions a conservation tract and maintenance buffer involving preservation of certair wetland and/or upland systems on the Property; and WHEREAS, the Grantor, in consideration of the consent granted by the Permit, is agreeable to granting and Securing to the Grantee a perpetual conservation easement as defined in Section 704.48, Florida Statutes (199S), over the Property. NOW. THEREFORE, in consideration of the issuance of the Permit to construct and operate the permitted activity, and as an inducement to Grantee in issuing the Permit, together with other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, creates, and e5tabti5he3 a o(6 BD- PL2010 -979 REV: 3 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE DATE: 8/4/11 DUE: 8/18/11 C OR: 2112 PG: 1313 rutive Reummion form - J►n —Y. '"N perpetual conservation easement for and in favor of the Grantee upon the Property which shall run with the land and be binding upon the Grantor, and shall remain in full force and effect forever. The scope, nature, and character of this conservation easement shall be as faikm; 1. it is the purpose of this conservation easement to retain land or water areas in their natural, vegetative, hydrologic, scenic, open, agricultural or wooded condition and to retain such areas as suitable habitat for fish, plants or wildlife. Those wetland and/or upland areas Included In the conservation easement which are to be enhanced or created pursuant to the Permit shall be retained and maintained in the enhanced or created condklena m4uirad by the Permit. To carry out this purpose, t �asement� ' a. To e equipment or vehicles tt unrea Wably interfere w time of such entry; and the Property at b. To t swith this conservation a and to onto of the Property that may aged by any 2. Except for > , reation activitles, or surface water marAag by the Permit, the following activities {;u hts are conveyed to Grantee by this or►4bte times with any necessary g nt In a manner that will not nt f thl Property by Grantor at the ►roperty that is inconsistent n of such areas or features ,itv or use. 9 nt, maintenance and monito6ng s, which are permitted or required in or on the Property, a. Construction or placing of buildings, roads, signs, billboards or other advertising, utilities, or other structures on or above the ground: b. Dumping or placing of soil or other substance or material as landfill, or dumping or placing of trash, waste, or unsightly or offensive materials; C. Removal or destruction of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation, except for the removal of exotic or nuisance vegetation in accordance with a District approved maintenance plan; d. Excavation, dredging, or removal of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock, or other material substance in such manner as to affect the surface; 2of6 n n OR, 2712 PG: 1314 t "Ve RatwiN roan - January, 1"ll A. SAW Uca exc ®pt lot purposes That perm;( the land or water area to amain in its lu#tural eenditien; f. Activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil conservation, or fish and wildlife habitat preoervdtlon jncluding, tUi not limited to, ditching, diking and fencing; water areas; g. Acts or uses detrimental to such aforementioned retention of land or h. Acts or uses which are detrimental to the preservation of any features or aspects of the Property having historical or archaeological significance, 3. Passive Recre Property, including the right herein and that are not it Infant and purposes of s not contrary to the pu approval by the District a. F ufor reserves all rights as owner of the Property that are not prohibited h any la, criteria. the Permit and the ion Easement. 'Pa ive recreational uses that are iemretio"asem nt Tay be permitted upon written walking t 'YGirantOr shall t�ct PraPvs' s to the Dist; if i )clearing for the purpose of § s, boardwalks or mulched PI for the construction of the t1' and written approval prior to ��..v.• wvHY1 .I \ {f'�j .{� b. The terns tanIt , the approved passive recraationaal facllities shall be subj owing conditions, i. Grantor shall minimize and avoid, to the fullest extent possible, impact to any wetland or upland butter areas within the Conservation Easement Area and shall avoid materially diverting tho direction of the natural surface water flow in such area; ii. Such facilities and improvements shall be constructed and maintained utilizing Best Management Practices; iiiii, Adequate containers for litter disposal shall he situatea adjacent to such facilities and improvements and periodic Inspections shall be instituted by the maintenance entity, to clean any litter from the area surrounding the facilities and improvements, 3arb OR: 2714' PG; '1315 PaSsin RomMoOn FOM - linvYy. 1991 iv, This conservation easement shall not constitute permit authorization for the construction and operation of the passive recreational facilities. Any such worts shalt be subject to all applicable federal, state, District or local permitting requirements. 4. No right of access by the general public to any portion of the Property is ccnveyed by this conservation easement. S. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liabilities related to the opom ion, upkeep or maintenance of the Property. 6. Grantor shall competent authority on the 7. Any costs and restrictions of this c the nonurevalling party i a. Enforcem easement shall be at t behalf of Grantee to e Grantor, shall not be de 9. Grantee wi purposes. Grantee will ammment except to an applicable at$te laws. any and all real property taxes and assessments levied by >'e �.1 r easement shall or construed to Id this conservr its right* lerwise, the terms, provisions e by and recoverable against est cttons of this conservation eel, and any forbearance on I of any breach hereof by d rantee's rights hereunder. N' exclusively for conservation Am under ItliS GOnserydoon hold Such interests under the 10. If any provision of this conservation easement or the appiicaGon thereof to any person or circumstances is found to be invalid. the remainder of the provisions of this conservation easement shall not be affected thereby, as long as the purpose of th(? conservation easement is preserved. 11. All notices, consents, approvals or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed property given if sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to tho appropriate party or SuG(;033Or • in- interest. 12. This conservation easement may be amended, altered. relaased or revoked only by written agreement between the parties hereto or their heirs, assigns or successors -in- interest, which shall be filed in the public records in Co 11 i e r _ County. 4of6 OR: -' PC- 1-31b Pusire Rectatm ►arm - lanuuy. 1wil TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto Grantee forever. The covenants, terms, conditions, restrictions and purpose imposed with this conservation easement shall be binding upon Grantor, and shall continue as a servitude running in perpetuity with the Property. Grantor hereby covenants with said Grantee that Grantor is lawfully seized of said Property in fee simple; that the Property is free and clear of all encumbrances that are inconsistent with the terms of his conservation easement and all mortgages have been joined or subordinated; that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to convey this conservation easement: and that it hereby fully warrants and defends the title to the conservation easement hereby conveyed against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, has hereunto set its authorized hand this___± da Signed, sealed and deliv eta/` , t ► i i ?, i 11 ► j� i j in our presence as witn se� Print Name. V, n OJ a Print Name. STATE OF: FLORIDA SS: COUNTY O On this { day of _ ate' before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared t ' personaily known to me to be the person who subscribed to the foregoing instrument and did not take an oath, as the (position) \) , of (corporation) y, � . �. , : + �. , . 1, 1 �,. a Florida corporation, and acknowledged that he executed the same on behalf of said corporation and that he was duly authorized to do so, lie 5 of6 P"Ove Reueaaon fwm - lanuuy, 1491 OR: 2712 PG: 13 1., IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal. NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF PLOPIDA t rte: My Commission Expir ®s. * * W Camrta.on CC7'ss47o '%T/ t.rwes AjxJ 19. 2002 South Florida Water Management District Legal Form Approved: SfVMD —January. 1999 ( V() C1 6of6 AWA M W PUT UNMP CMMMUN EA50"T ALLUVM PASSIVE MCCRU Tjavx USE. APW-WCVnP"rCLy P7." ACMCS. ima Acft-s ar ^ww"ry m ar PUT umeR CDAdIVVA TAN rAWMNTI "Y ACWT Ir WN VAYrft IN MAN MK CWML ACT PUT LAWR CaV=VATIM EAMENT. OR; 2712 PG: 1318 IT low INEM AWMAM AM fM PCMNtrT" OLY No AV our wom fm comwimuclum use T*Wwau & AMEMMAN"s, o ><206 own a bommom sm M- lwwoUt.105.1.10M 2.1 THE DUNES Zi Uu;hi OR: 2712 PG: 1319 BBI:s SURVEYORS do MAPPERS INC. 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 TEL, 941 - 5971315 FAX 941 - 597 -5207 CONSERVATION EASEMENT (ALLOWING PASSIVE RECREATIONAL USE) A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLoRtDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMF,NCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST ; THENCE N,89 °5220 "W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF 1316.81 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTH LINE THENCE N.00°07'40 "E., A DISTA r T TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF BLUE R PLIGHT OF WAY AND THE POI NT OF BF..G[NN HE PARCEL 0 HEREIN DESCRIBED,; THENCE N.89 052'20 "W., OF AY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET THENCE .00 4'A ST E OF 1.9 FEET TO A POINT ON 48 , THE MEAN HIGH WA R I,; THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WA L E N TY -NINE DESCIU13ED COURSES i) THENCE N.22 71"t' S "E., A DI T F F 2) THENCE N.45 "E., A DISTANCE 2 .8 T; 3) THENCE Kor ., A DISTANCE T; 4) THENCE N.30 055' DISTANCE 01: EET; 5) TINGE N.W30 3 156 FEET; 6) THENCE N.3$° 11 '04 "151, 22.70 FEET; 7) THENCE N.26 928'34 "E., A DISTANCE OF 45.88 FEET; 8) THENCE N.47 90339 "E., A DISTANCE OF 30.33 FEET; 9) THENCE N.2 1 °36'35 "E., A DISTANCE OF 13.33 FEET; 10) THENCE S.55 °19'56 "E., A DISTANCE OF 26.82 FEET; 11) THENCE N.7S °30'07 "E., A DISTANCE OF 63.12 FELT*, 12) THENCE N.S4019'4S "E., A DISTANCE OF 26.39 FEET; 13) 'THENCE S.38 057'22 "E., A DISTANCE OF 28.08 FEET, 14) THENCE S.20 042'37 "E., A DISTANCE OF 30.10 FEET; 15) THENCE S.55 028132 "W., A DISTANCE OF 26.35 FEET; 16) THENCE S.15019129 "W., A DISTANCE OF 22.23 FEET; 17) THENCE S. 550151320E., A DISTANCE OF 3S.67 FEET, 18) T=NCE S.44 °11'21 "E., A DISTANCE OF 19.22 FEET, 19) THENCE 5.54-45-21-E,, A DISTANCE OF 13.06 FEET; 20) THENCE N.59 °48'06 "E., A DISTANCE OF 19.10 FEET; 21) THENCE N.33 °05'56 "E., A DISTANCE OF 21.28 FEET; 1 OF 5 5 OR: 4712. PG: 1330 22) THENCE N.01 °09'27 "E., A DISTANCE OF 42.95 FEET; 23) THENCE N.08 °54'42 "E., A DISTANCE OF 15.54 FEET; 24) THENCE S.89°27'23 "W., A DISTANCE OF 27.24 FEET, 25) THENCE N.54 °0830 "W., A DISTANCE OF 21.49 FEET; 26) THENCE N.42 041'44 "E., A DISTANCE OF 26.82 FEET; 27) THENCE N,23 °30'59 "W., A DISTANCE OF 26.62 FEET; 28) THENCE N.73 °34'34 "W., A DISTANCE OF 36.87 FEET; 29) THENCE N. 13-1777-W., A DISTANCE OF 18.87 FEET; 30) THENCE N.04 °29'38 "W., A DISTANCE OF 22.33 FEET; 31) THENCE N, 14-47-00-W, A DISTANCE OF 48.76 FEET; 32) THENCE N, 17-54-54-W., A DISTANCE OF 32.99 FEET; 33) THENCE N. 13-25-36-W., A DISTANCE OF 29.50 FEET 34) THENCE N.09°09'57 "W., A DISTANCE OF 26.16 FEET; 3s) TfWNCE M.10041'3S "W., A DISTANCE OF 20.88 FEET; 36) THENCE N 10014113 "W., A DISTANCE OF 35.48 FEET; 37) THENCE N. 13-42'04"W., A DISTANCE OF 27.27 FIRET. 38) THENCE N.39 °57'13 "W., 7.28 FEET, 39) THENCE N.40 °22'08", EET: 40) THENCE N.47 °17'3 DISTANCE 0 ET; 41) THENCE N.54° 49" TANCE OF 14.7 T; 42) THENCE N.05° 2 52 T 15.04 E T; 43) THENCE N.2004ST " 44) THENCE N.33 ' " D S 2. E ; 45) THENCE N.46 S OF 7 46) THENCE S.88° .,A DI TAN F , 47) T14ENCE N.87 °1 W_, A DISTANCE 1 .7 ; 48) THENCE N.450 , A DISTANCE 6 T; 49) THENCE N.59 °324 1 DISTANCE OF T; 50) THENCE N.15 °4b' 1 A FEET; 51) THENCE N.16 °1748 "W., 0.58 FEET; 52) THENCE N.25 °39'41 "W., A DISTANCE OF 24.57 FEET; 53) THENCE N,09'2475 "W., A DISTANCE OF 29.74 FEET; 54) THENCE N. 1601233-W., A DISTANCE OF 21.84 FEET; s5) THENCE N.06024'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 23.53 FEET; 56) THENCE N.00-1 1-20-E., A DISTANCE OF 28.03 FEET; 57) THENCE N.03 °52'00 "W.; A DISTANCE OF 20.05 FEET; 58) THENCE N.0291711 "W., A DISTANCE OF 15.60 FEET, 59) THENCE N.12 °55'13 "E., A DISTANCE OF 16.98 FEET; 60) THENCE N.03 °1954 "W., A DISTANCE OF 17.22 FEET; 611 THENCE N.03 053'33 "E_, A DISTANCE OF 34.03 FEET$ 62) THENCE N -03 °48'31 "E., A DISTANCE OF 28.62 FEET, 63) THENCE N.03 °06'00 "E_, A DISTANCE OF 28.51 FEET; 64) THENCE N.07°SO'12 "W., A DISTANCE OF 27.58 FEET; 65) THENCE N.01 °03'54 "E., A DISTANCE OF 18.08 FEET; 66) THENCE N.0594T53 "W., A DISTANCE. OF 26.12 FEET; 2 OF 5 f_ OR; 27A, f ♦ Y 41107 ; J 3 V J 67) THENCE N.14 °21'01 "W., A DISTANCE OF 23.99 FEET; 68) THENCE N,01 °18'39 "E., A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 69) THENCE N.09 000'32 "E., A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET; 70) THENCE N.00 °3732 "E., A DISTANCE. OF 26.47 FEET, 71) THENCE N.02 °49'07 "E., A DISTANCE OF 29.20 FEET; 72) THENCE N.02 °58'47 "E., A DISTANCE OF 30.28 FEET; 73) THENCE N.00 °50'14 "W., A DISTANCE OF 24.92 FEET; 74) THENCE N. 16-54-54-W., A DISTANCE OF 25.04 FEET; 75) THENCE N.05 054'42 "E., A DISTANCE OF 24.89 FEET; 76) THENCE N.04040'DS "E., A DISTANCE OF 27.35 FEET; 77) THENCE N.05 °4736 "W., A DISTANCE OF 25.87 FEET, 78) THENCE N.09 °11'48 "E., A DISTANCE OF 22.23 FEET; 79) THENCE N.07 °59'19 "E., A DISTANCE OF 32.14 FEET, 80) THENCE N.06 °19'23 "E., A DISTANCE OF 28.29 FEET; 81) THENCE N.07 °47'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 25.29 FEET; 82) THENCE N.03 00934 "W., A DISTANCE OF 23.35 FEET; 83) THENCE N_04 000'22 "E., AJ11 21.98 FEET; 84) THENCE N. ISO 13-30- ' }� 5 FEET; 85) THENCE N.50 °36'3 ISTANCE,O MET; 86) THENCE N.89 °5 I A DISTANCE OF 17, 6 F T; 87) THENCE NAI- 11 E. IS 22.7 - T; 88) THENCE N.61 5'l 7 EE ; 89) THENCE 5.88 7'S, T; 90) THENCE: N.78 5 F 91) THENCE S. 67 F 3 F ; 92) THENCE 5.730 E., A DISTANCE 14. 2 93) THENCE S.58 °3 ., A DISTANCE 17 3 T; 94) THENCE S.49'5V DISTANCE OF 1 ET; 95) THENCE S.19 °05'48 S EET; 96) THENCE S.56 °25'36 "E., .37 FEET; 97) TMNUL 5,89 °13'14 "E.1 A DISTANCE OF 27.x0 FEET; 98) THENCE N.65 °07'37 "E., A DISTANCE OF 20 16 FEET; 99) THENCE NA4054M "E., A DISTANCE OF 11.50 FEET; THENCE S.73 00142 "E_, LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE. A DISTANCE OF 345.51 FEET; THENCE S.4594'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 195.23 FEET; THENCE N.44 °49'41 "E., A DISTANCE OF 29.35 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING- A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 47013'38", A CHORD BEAMG OF S.97099'04 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF S6.08 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC. LENGTH OF 57.70 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.45 °0935 "E., A DISTANCE OF 74.52 FEET; THENCE N.44 °49'41 "E., A DISTANCE OF 200.55 %EET, THENCE MW18'04 "E., A DISTANCE OF 12.05 FEET; THENCE N.70 040'19 "E., A DISTANCE OF 117.14 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 159.24 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23633'22 ", A CHORD BEARING OF N.58 °4877 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 65.01 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 65.47 FEET TO THE END OF 3OF5 OR; 3716 PG: 1322 SAID CURVE, THENCE N.38 013'26 "E., A DISTANCE OF 0.64 FEET; THENCE 5.69'°'00`35 "E., A DISTANCE OF 121.69 FEET, THENCE N.8 1-0675-E., A DISTANCE OF 91.44 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 79.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93 °49'47 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.20 °1872 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 115.39 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 129.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF REYERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT,14AVING: A .RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 01046 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.01 058'09 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 20.85 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 21.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE 'f0 THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 230.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 103 °3701 ", A CHORD BEARING OF 5.Z9°05'17 "E, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 361,59 I'LLT; TI[ENCV, ALONG THE ARC of SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 415.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF REYER5E CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 106 006'27 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.27 °53'33 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 19 1. 81 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 222.23 FEET TO THE P OUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING: A IJ CENTRAL ANGLE OF 85 °31'55 ", A CHORD BE l .67 055'37 "W. A ORD LENGTH OF 230.86 FEET; THENCE ALONG T OF SAID CURVE, LENGTH OF 253.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANG N ; THEN E ?+1.69° 18`25 "W., A DISTANCE OF 226.66 T P F A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RAD S R E LE OF 3002841 ", A CHORD BEARING OF N. F 210.28 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE OF 212.78 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CUR CE NORTH , IS Gl? jr 81.68 FEET; THENCE N.OI °45'52 "W., A DISTAN 1 1.24 FEET; TI ° '22 "W., A DISTANCE OF 103.96 FEET; THENCE N.46° ':F, , A DISTANCE -4 FEE'r; THENCE N.14 °48'41 "W., A DISTANCE O T1 45 °14`00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 142,98 FEET, THENCE S.89 °46'00" 3 F 63.18 FEET, THENCE 5.44 046'00 "W.1 A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE S.89 °46'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING. A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °48'40% A CHORD BEARING OF S.80 °21'40 "W_ AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG THB ARC of SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING- A RADIUS OF 74.80 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 0221400, A CHORD BEARING OF S.44046W "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 66.03 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 68.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING' A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 048'40 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.09 010'20 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.00 014100 "E., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET; THENCE 5.44 °46'00 "W„ A DISTANCE OF 16 43 FEET; THENCE S.00° 14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 64.82 FEET; THENCE, S.44 046'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 56.97 FEET; OR: 1712 PG: "_3 L!.. , 1J THENCE S.20 012110 "W., A DISTANCE OF 25.12 FEET; THENCE S.00 014'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 66.80 FEET; THENCE S.89 046'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 68.02 FEET; THENCE S.44 046'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE S.00 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE S.44 046'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °4840 ", A CHORD BEARING OF 5.35°21'40 "W, AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET: THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 20.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 740 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ;2022140 ". A CHORD BEARING OF 5.00 114W "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 6&03 FI'ET;'nMNC1" ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 68.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °48'40 , A CHORD BEARING OF S.35 °49'40 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.45 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET; THENCE S_00° 14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 16. 9-45014100"E, A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE N.89 °46' 76 FEET; THENCE S.00 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE FEET; THEN C 000 "E., A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE S.00° 00" ,_AJ)ST E OF 201 T; THENCE N.89 046'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 18.95 FE T; �`EIEVCE S. _ '43Y., A jST CE OF 20.17 FEET; THENCE S.45 00740 "W., ,� DI 2 f -N - 5.00°OT40 "W., A DISTANCE OF 63. I8 FEE ; S4 5 ' E OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE 5.00 °07'40 "W,, T F 5 ,49 EE T INT OF CURVATURE OF A CURYE TO THE LE NO" 0 � T, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30 003'42 ", A CHORD B NG OF S.14 °54'11 D ORD LENGTH OF 45.52 FEET; THENCE ALONG T C OF SAID CUR LENGTH OF 46.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPO RVATURE OF A TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 71.25 FEET, A CE °5' ", A CHORD BEARING OF 5.47 °24'58"E. AND A CHORD LEN 4 , 'THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 43.48 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE 5.00 °07'40 "W,, A DISTANCE OF 44.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 23.88 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, BEARINGS REFER TO AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N.89 °52'20 "W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TIAS PROPER I Cl JE TO EA5LMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 08/ 16/2000 STEP B Y, TE ORIDA (L.S, #5296) BBLS SURVEYORS A MAPPERS INC. (L.B. #6753) P1toom ovorAw sEs (SEE ATTACHED SKETCH- 9984LS) 5OF5 sm"m IVOW&w I Am t.sAw tMl w N Ulw.w� M Itai M '�tUF. tiw t.lw un na 1 Aft~ r nm o • ru! Now K "K M. ALL co " PA" A=MfM w fitfl [wnry, nMa N «u M wp"wm as Lt fill .w1p.M1 — r n.n -% rn Z"m 11111fffn ti a WULV M ir M "m w aum Od117ilydtll{ 4w/Y� ti !.. M w mm r O.- !M Pm .1t.I..K w �/ �Jt RCA/ M Clap ow", nowk cma" "a M 'ottim, 2" ten Mww.q w .wwa .r wrw w� to t CCNWA►A71ON ' [ASIME f.�at)t All uwC3�� d- *?* "a» MGM ►M lolptcoi tl1R im t. I►CAT 0"% t% Pa95 ..,) OR; 2112 PG: 1324 =rjfo •69 /�tr1 w wwi.w�o ►¢c ►offl a OOrr NUVEwf nchm Do Pm MId4 m[CdtC MO %f t t w.o — R &Tome s K..r.t P." N • h �gjgt - � I f (, f as rro Jeo r�o' SCAL C, TKCICH 94Y HAVE 9fN RED[ EB) I s THIS !S NOT A SVRVEY GEMERAl. MOTES (� �a�wos �U wq M =S�• �wYY4 P.mvf ac OW y t) wtwlpNy sowl tfAte. �IU[ w n" ow KC"fts Ua w •� acs >rsr s n s .� a.i. 910W •ru `~ FAA vtlg* PAC St1NKC A W WM �. (W ITKWT -li - WAY) Kr ffjWj #Inds k 89'3t 'tf'v. I ifs -IJ' MIN LAt 1X SM X ►vP. 48 S., RW, t3 C. SriE 71 OF SUTCH TO ACCOWANY LEGAL. DESCRAWM sKs dtAllyllaRS /r � iMC COANMOMMODAW ISO" AM MUD MLM SECTICIN /tylR*INr N RAAAOE?l EJISi CALUE'A mtrltl! A MPU4 ftoMA MIN (MI) a+rt-rtTS r, Y V � • x1 d r ��t a R THIS ISr NOT A SMVEY OR: 2712 PG: 1325 oil &.11 �x�gaif J ti H O ih� C r 7 M ro b SHEET a oor J ` 1 SKETCH TO ACC0WAMY I EQAL DESCRiPTRM &Sw a�vrro+q a �ar+�rR♦r a 1 r COMOVARMEAMW 111114A RAIL MADAM (ALLQIMM P'A:aW MOM IM" ilk% SECTrWm. CALLK' 1iL10tMIrY�� 'J�lri___R{AMC�ElSEA$T t1APtlR,FRpAU7,tat�tali+�)I1sts 11* OR: 11.712 PG: 1325 "t DIMENSION SHEET L INE TA BL E /NL Kff^U flfr wt U AWI#Vry Il fl' 107 SL letJ•7rMY !11)' L7J S!.'7rlfT !I )r !r YJa••7JT Ir}f' LN 1045,g.'V .116.• L 0 f7ruUK lasr l/ wilmis'"" t196 go* aMf`N'dry 1. f,- C-3 tar.lafT m 7f w ll lgr'M7 Mfr t!1 N)J•a,lw Mill ttr Mill K ll wi'lYN1 .v/)t ,l! IIYw7NT tr.r Lf1 8I6317,31T Ma 177• LIP aA!`llSry t9N' Lf. S.'I',J•NT `!r c+ aLK't1•NT .iff• 11) MN llYry 1401- Ly 1L,9144r tl)! I LIP A36.11wr lr,t L1a W,•l,'A•v NI.' tl16 M.'91At•, *1m L N13 "7f97Y f)Ar Lri NWttwv rfY tW! N,f'K,rT lrtJJ llr tf9•,►'!av JILL Lab AO""J, V r /.v' .a,y 1.1'Irlfi !•>i 911 11C /'x'nY 1 }Ill r!l rlrftsiv I /!7• iM1 Mf'Mf+/[ WAS Lill ar/Yr»•t I.lr tw rr..7W t9 •r Lab• .a•rrT 1,14. 11J Ml >•!a•ir'V 1YK tit Af.'fl•J7'V Am, trq SHy.'J!T llfft tH M.•.1yr•v all i.• tM 'A►'.rl1w ". Oft awv. /n AVTVi.•V 10 )7• Lit uu'1.'rlT r.rf• 10114' aN1vrwy p.a.' LN A17'1,ys•v /IIJ• Las w/•erl+`Y L11' lay .6t -•!y-v loll.' Lill Mll'J.'N'v X.,' too mwul ##T Moi• lIM Sff•it ?i'V 16316' L,. .Vl•Jf7T✓ r.6.r' La. y!•1r36Y r9rl' t1M a..6•arlsw .S+a. fill Ya►•II'wY Afar• tip L11014mir rJ JS' tilt Ma'Ka!-V Nfl• <N /•31',A'1f'V r11P <r a.0194 'AIT I•rf lllr T/7WWw N,r erl f.f77%TV lJra' 61 A 16f•ia'i w FIC4 till SN•af 1.Y /f.Ir Lh ,ay'- t.•.t'T ,f �.- tN !N-*rs.w :.ill L/N tr1• w./•v xar Irl atk WO" Irrr tall ayMyrv►T 76rw• till f.rufAT 94 A Irl m1m 'A It tl f.' 1)1 4WIMPT 17iv- LIM SN'h'N•v Mal• .•'l 4MYM1TT 19W t„ M.'Jh]r+T Ma,' LHJ TrWo" loaf 1113 7N'1TtlT !)111' LI� jj� Lit* SN'HMT NR all SII•rie I.11r l e,6�•t Mor Lltf trI•Lf ArV ry..2' ,rr 371• »•)r•t tytr , � , ,t 4 14 31 +•/6tfw 1►7r lit s,!•Irr:•v rrrr , L/N iaa -w�Mw •1'f' 1 A 3Se•1f1'F•'V rf J7' iYY.•''♦ �f Lill SI+'w MY .00C a 1t S.y.rJJY lot#• j"qy , wrlrlrw ll2J SU''I am" NI) I M 14.77111'1 HM' ��J l7f MJ'�MT tK! J••'M Mr'V X4. .tr .n1•)r.lK h7s' �j In aYJ•M't/T M all' a,Il t•!•,. wT 9/.• l N NIJ'!7'Jf Y lf]f 4 LM MJ'�1i1i I1lJ" L)i1f iW7�1/T I All .0* ill• /.Iry ,a., M ,yt,' /7' /l•V 19W �1fr 7ty- � t/1r f.l1oY.I'V Iraq „J ..3.9r,.•v rtlh• ,mlvt ,rT ..►,Y 11 tIH 37I•N .IY .`CIA ! M a.1'll'XY M.)' low II'lIT )r' lLM Wf'af'rT NI!1 l .► aY-rl+rY Itlr a LAS .IN uw,.aVT l.- 1 N Mf'It'711V ?IN N trill Nf!'M'I11'1 Sir . N Mr'r1 Y7'V LIJJ Sf worr ..F) Lv nr9ltary 0.1 1 tut 1 u a66•lrlf V MW ,arf`a3'LT tlt.ry L w Il Lin Swl,dfy ill•+ it 1 71.'9rWY IH Alf•7,TaI'V 1919' 1 !1 77 { l lot)) SMY,'ory ♦lq alt WSriYrV rill• 11{l sIr's7z♦ 0.1r 4 O ffr6J'Iry ads. 11" 'A"JIMT 9o1r LIN ul►IJ'NT Rtr' �. MLT Ao1IVS .LL . Clalf. <rIRMf. r/ NOW I,'Ir3.• 97Ar Saar 7641/' f.,7.11T cr nor/ rr»Lw rsdr "JW atr' ltl.Vf•r/T t7 7f,r rivrlr N.1r• kw• lnlr we"IfK'v ed rS.r Io•Aow• Mgr I1I7- x.9- M-50' 7T CS r).N !fJ'Nw• Q1W Owir loll 7r SOrworT 16 An tr M/7r J~3' 83.96• 1 I s,• Wl Yrr rr 10fr 513156 »J,r nlrr rnfll' S►7.7311-v [I atolr 7rlr u• rtr sr /ror rAr.• .Ad•}rww Cf M/s' N-K/I• Jt *' qM" r37r SrrN Iry [M Jar• SPIW 6• Mir' X16 "or 1. /VLW-v Cu 1flt t.•KM' ftN' lift 1916 m1frorll CV !IN• WOW— ;;Jr 1616 — or•lliry nJ Stir Lrevr e++r• ner t7r usvr+w t•l. rM' 1/•165.• ras,- Law n..' rte v.•a.Y rrs tarn" Muir 1�a 133r nVr 1141f nT cla ,tl!-.1. —r V- .l.r' K..' .,r• %.)Vq x iii! q war //A OURVEY 30F3 SKETCH TO ACCOWPAHY LEGAL DESCRNI M M.S sWvEwm a worm m CCW INVAnM FASMOW 1SMA PAX NW ML Q WCTXW2R 70*WgWMSWM RANOE29"9r ~"A R.00WAofia(M11a.r.lair COLLIER MW N, FLORIDA SW A a a I* go. -.4. Project Management Services Synopsis of Neighborhood Information Meeting for the Dunes PDI - PL2012 -159 On February 17, 2012, a neighborhood information meeting was held at St John The Evangelist Catholic Church. Richard Yovanovich, as the presenter, introduced himself, his team and Nancy Gundlach from the county staff. The meeting was attended by approximately 57 members of the community. Richard explained that the purpose of the meeting was to review the request by Vanderbilt Partners II LTD to revise the Dunes PUD Master Plan to identify where the boat docks are to be located. He went on to tell the attendees that although the meeting was specifically for the modification to the PUD Master Plan that Tim Hall of Turrell & Associates was available to review the Boat Dock Extension application and give the opportunity to ask questions. He went on to explain that the section of the LDC for NlM criteria is poorly written and that there will be another meeting to satisfy the most restrictive notification of 7 days. Richard provided a brief history of the Dunes PUD starting in 1998 and subsequent PUD revision in 2000. He explained the changes to the dock requirements that were approved in 2000 which made the PUD criteria typical to other PUDs. He summarized the hearing minutes where the developer agreed to no more than 60 docks with no docking in Water of Turkey Bay. He goes on to point out that the plan specifically shows that the docks are to be located in the man made water body. He also reads the note that was added on the Master Plan concerning the docks and prohibition of docks on Turkey Bay. He tells the audience that he disagrees with the County's determination that this process of revising the Master Plan. He also explains that based on the amount of shoreline, the Dunes could have over 900 docks, but the developer agreed to limit the number and location as well as dedicate the remainder to conservation. He mentions that there is currently a conservation easement granted to South Florida Water Management on the preserves as well as the water of Turkey Bay that we own. He clarifies that the proposed 49 docks are only for the owners of the Dunes. He goes on to show that there were docks approved on the west side of the man made channel approved by the county after we had our zoning with the master plan designations. A member of the public asked why he disagrees with the staff concerning the requirement to modify the master plan and he replies that the PUD document clearly provides the criteria for the boat dock approval process and that the record of the 2000 hearing supports his position. He introduces Tim Hall to review the dock application. There was a question from the audience on who maintains the waterway to which Tim responded that it has been the County. Frank Halas made a statement that there was substantial opposition to the docks and his impression was that there was to be no boat docks allowed but after the meeting county staff allowed the developer write the PUD document and that docks were inserted at that time. There was a discussion on whether we were reneging on the perpetual conservation easement for which we clarified that the easement was in place and would not be changed. There were questions on who was responsible for the maintenance of the preserves as well as the docks. Tim Hall clarified that the Dunes Property Association will maintain some of the preserves, some will be deeded over to the state and that the docks will be maintained by the future Dock Association. There was a question whether the County got benefit via fees for the ability to have the right to build docks and if not, why should the Dunes be granted the permission to have docks. It was explained that waterfront property has riparian rights and that docks are accessory uses to residential. ATTACHMENT D 2335 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 408, Naples, FL 34103 / (239) 435 -9080 x3 / Fax 435 -9082 /Email: karenbishop @pmsnaples.com GWAOO 16 ow-40 Project Management Services There was other commentary that the Dunes owners had no expectation for docks and should not expect docks at this late date. A resident from the Dunes chose to respond that he bought in 2000 and clearly had expectation of docks. A different commentary ensued about what rights really exist to the property owner and that the constitution does not guarantee dock rights and that the building of the docks may constitute a taking of the view the neighbors enjoy although the west side of the channel is a seawall. Another speaker inquired about the sewage disposal, which was explained, would be handled through a pump out process by the dock master and disposed of through the existing sewer system at the Dunes. Doug Fee asked a question on ownership of the mangroves which was explained that the state has requested that we deed some portions of the preserves. Rich clarifies that the PUD document does not require that we provide a conservation easement over the water. There was some conversation on the existence of sea grasses along the shoreline, as well as the ownership of the bottom lands at the man made canal. There was discussion on the public access across the channel and future dedication to the State of Florida. Tim Hall gave a presentation on the docks. He clarified that the state and federal agencies have never questioned the Dunes rights for docks. The design related to the number and size of the slips , number and location of the access points have been vetted by all agencies. He goes on the to explain the anticipated sea grass area dictated where our docks were located which dictated the number of slips. Tim answer questions on the width of the channel in different areas and how much space the boats in the perpendicular slips needed to back out over 20' feet into the channel. Tim went further to explain which agencies had jurisdiction for the navigation that led to our approval. There were questions concerning who gets to buy the docks and how the owners would be chosen. A representative of the condominium on the west side of the channel discussed his concern that the seawall would be damaged due to the boat traffic and that their riprap extends into the channel making the channel smaller. Tim Hall explains the permitting processed for riprap and that there isn't damage to seawalls along Marco Island where seawalls are on both sides as well as dockage. Tim also responds to a question about fueling which he clarifies is not allowed. However, as previously discussed, there is a portable pump out stored near the uplands. There will also be the need for some dredging and that the dock design will not interfere with the manatees. He goes on to explain the length of time it took to get the permits, which included the Manatee lawsuit and gives a history of the waterway construction. Tim reminded the audience that if there were issues with boats not adhering to the idle speed designation then it was subject to enforcement. 2335 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 408, Naples, FL 34103 / (239) 435- 9080 x3 / Fax 435 -9082 /Email: karenbishop @pmsnaples.com AGENDA ITEM 8 -13 Co tier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION — PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: MARCH 1, 2012 SUBJECT: BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE (THE DUNES DOCKS) (COMPANION ITEM TO: PDI- PL2012 -159, THE DUNES PUD) PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Vanderbilt Partners II Ltd. Agent: Mr. Timothy Hall 11125 Gulfshore Drive # 301 Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Naples, FL 34108 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting a 261 -foot Boat Dock Extension (BDE) from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet for waterways greater than 100 feet in width, which will allow construction of a boat docking facility with a maximum protrusion of 281 feet into a waterway that varies from 150 to 471 feet wide. Boat lifts are optional for all slips. Along with the BDE, the petitioner is also proposing a Boathouse. (See "The Dunes Proposed Design with Aerial" drawing prepared by Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., dated February 5, 2010.) GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located in The Dunes Planned Unit Development (PUD) at 11495 Vanderbilt Drive, Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page.) BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 1 of 14 Q z z O N 75 z _O U O J n rn 0 0 N J a 0 CD z O H H W a @q f0' li ` �a ltse'a �l u ana atl oor0009 � rcY' 3 Y =Fi" �yn3lfl!)0 JWtltl }31131x009 �a i u"'.. .K C-a, gbi ¢f sN I lltltlL WVIWtll ig TAM�nMI TWl N.s.nt) anlaa rneu3a+vn Omw w LLJ J ° ~ Z }MEXICO ' 0 C) OF m w GULF O Q cr O IL O J H Q z z O N 75 z _O U O J n rn 0 0 N J a 0 CD z O H H W a @q PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the project is to construct an 11,300 square -foot area (over water) boat dock facility for 49 vessels up to 35 feet in length. The proposed boat dock layout consists of a 35 -foot long by 6 -foot wide fishing pier with a roofed 12 by 12 foot area at the north end of the docking facility. This roofed fishing area is considered to be a "boathouse" per the LDC section 5.03.06 F. (Collier County Land Development Code). (See "The Dunes Detail Area 2" drawing prepared by Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., dated May 2, 2011) Attached to the south end of the fishing pier is a shore parallel dock approximately 1,540 feet long by 6 -foot wide that includes 15 (fifteen) 30 -foot long by 4 -foot wide finger piers requiring bow first mooring for 26 of the 49 proposed mooring slips. The remaining 23 slips will require parallel mooring to the dock. The BCC minutes from the November 14, 2000 adoption hearing for The Dunes PUD indicate that a maximum of 60 boat docks would be requested and that the boat docks would not be located in Water Turkey Bay. (See Attachment A: November 14, 2000 BCC minutes.) The site plans submitted are within the parameters discussed at the November 14, 2000 meeting. The project also includes the installation of 8 (eight), 100 -foot long sections of natural limestone riprap beneath the dock to provide structural habitat for marine life, to serve as a surge baffle to protect nearby shore sea grasses, and to help stabilize submerged sediments. The proposed docks are located within a man-made channel which connects Vanderbilt Lagoon to Water Turkey Bay and further out to Wiggins Pass. The protrusion varies up to a maximum of 281 feet from the Mean High Water Line (MHWL), the maximum protrusion into the navigable portion of the waterway varies from 49 feet down to about 46 feet. The requested protrusion is necessary to protect the natural mangrove shoreline and ephemeral sea grasses which periodically grow adjacent to the mangroves. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: The Dunes PUD SURROUNDING: North: Turkey Bay, an approximately 800 to 1,400 -foot wide waterway with a zoning designation of The Dunes PUD East: Mangroves and then multi - family residential towers, with a zoning designation of The Dunes PUD South: Bluebill Avenue, and then residential single - family with a zoning designation of RSF -3 BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 3 of 14 West: a 150 to 250 -foot wide waterway (measured from mangrove fringe to seawall) and then multi - family residential towers, with a zoning designation of RMF -16 Aerial photo taken from Collier County Property Appraiser website. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) and LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) CONSISTENCY: Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): The GMP addresses multi- family boat docks and boat dock extensions within Policy 10.6.1. which states: "Boathouses, boat shelters and dock facilities shall be located and aligned to stay at least 10 feet from any existing seagrass beds except where a continuous bed of seagrass exists off BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 4 of 14 of the shore of the property, in which case facility heights shall be at least 3.5 feet NGVD, terminal platforms shall be less than 160 square feet and access docks shall not exceed a width of four (4) feet." This policy and Policy 6.3.2 which addresses dock facilities for single family developments are the only instances where dock facilities are addressed in the GMP. The policy is intended to protect seagrass beds when dock facilities are within ten feet of seagrass beds, requiring that when these facilities encroach upon this ten foot setback requirement, then the dimensions of the boat dock facility must be consistent with the Policy. The boat dock plans for the Dunes boat dock facility conforms to these regulations and therefore can be found consistent with the GMP. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): Comprehensive Planning has found the proposed rezone consistent with the FLUE. For further reference, please see Attachment E: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review Memorandum. Land Development Code (LDC): The LDC permits private docks, including mooring pilings, davits, lifts and the like to serve waterfront property, provided such docks do not protrude more than the respective allowable distances as specified in subsection 5.03.06 of the LDC for such waterway or waterbody. Docks and the like are primarily intended to adequately secure moored vessels and provide safe access for routine maintenance and use while minimally impacting: navigation within any adjacent navigable channel, the use of the waterway, the use of the neighboring docks, the native marine habitat, the manatees, and the view of the waterway by the neighboring property owners. Even though the policies contained in the GMP and the standards contained in subsection 5.03.06.J of the LDC were derived from the state provisions that were established for single - family boat docks, the County has subsequently had difficulty in applying these provisions to those private docks serving multi - family residential developments. Where a continuous bed of seagrasses exist off shore of the property and adjacent to the property, the applicant shall be allowed to build a dock across the seagrass beds, or a docking facility within 10 feet seagrass beds as long as the dock complies with the applicable conditions provided in 5.03.06.J a. -d. As a result, the multiple private docks proposed for the Dunes multi - family residential development that are located within 10 feet of seagrass beds must comply with the provisions of LDC subsection 5.03.06.J a. -d while those portions of the proposed docking facility located more than 10 feet away are not subject to these provisions. ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning section staff has reviewed this petition and has found the request to be consistent with the pertinent sections of the GMP and LDC. Section 5.03.06.E.11 (Manatee Protection) of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) is applicable to all multi -slip docking facilities with ten (10) or more slips. Manatee Protection Plan Consistency: BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 5of14 Objective 10.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) and the Manatee Protection Plan (MPP) were used to review the proposed docks. The application identifies less than 5 percent impact to native marine habitat. The calculation for manatee use rating is "Not High." Water depth will be adequate to the nearest marked channel once the proposed dredging is complete. However, no depth readings were provided for adequate depth out to the Gulf (or a five mile radius), so the project qualifies for a moderate rating. This rating allows up to 10 boat slips for every 100 feet of shoreline. Construction of new dry storage facilities and new boat ramps is prohibited. With the submitted information and current data available, construction of 49 slips is consistent with the Manatee Protection Plan. As stated in the MPP, the following information has also been taken under consideration. 3.2.3 Site Specific Recommendations: "3.2.3.1 Wiggins Pass Area: The waters of the Wiggins Pass area are very shallow, on average less than 5 feet at Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). The Army Corps of Engineers designed the Wiggins Pass System for 3 -foot draft vessels, and current maintenance dredging permits are based on the 3 -foot draft design. All marina or multi -dock facilities should advise their patrons of this potential draft limitation. Provisions should be made for posting the draft limitations on nautical charts, in notices to mariners and possible signs at the pass entrance." Please note that the exhibits provided by the applicant indicate a maximum draft of 3 feet and a maximum vessel length of 35 feet. During final construction plan (Site Development Plan) review, these findings may change based on the information submitted at that time. Consistency with relative Objectives and Policies in Goals 6 and 10 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, including the Manatee Protection Plan The project, as proposed, is consistent with Goal 6 of the CCME in that the vegetation impact proposed for the project will not impact the minimum native vegetation requirement for the site. This will be required to be identified on the Site Development Plan (SDP) when it is amended for the addition of the docks. The details provided by the applicant indicate minimization to seagrass bed impacts as required by Objective 6.3 and Policy 10.6.1. The project will be consistent with Goal 10 of the CCME once the following policy is addressed with the amendment to the SDP. Policy 10.1.4: BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 6 of 14 New marinas shall conform to the following criteria: Marinas and multi -slip docking facilities shall prepare hurricane plans for approval which describe measures to be taken to minimize damage to marina sites and neighboring properties and the environment; this hurricane plan shall be reviewed and approved by the County. This will be required at the time of the Site Development Plan Amendment for the docks STAFF COMMENTS: The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a dock facility extension, boathouse /covered structure request based on the following criteria. In order for the CCPC to approve this request, it must be determined that at least four of the five primary criteria, four of the six secondary criteria and all six of the boathouse criteria have been met. Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 and finds the following: Primary Criteria: 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and /or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single - family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi - family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The proposed multi - family dock facility consists of 49 boat slips, which is appropriate in relation to the number of multi - family units, which is 640 units on a property with a zoning designation of PUD. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion met. According to the survey submitted by the petitioner, the water depth at the site is not adequate to accommodate the 30 to 35 -foot vessels described in the petitioner's application at mean low tide (0.4') without an extension. Furthermore, 1.32 acres of dredging is proposed in order to provide adequate depth (1 -foot of clearance from the bottom of the boat at low tide) for the mooring of boats. BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 7 of 14 In addition, please note that the MHWL is located within a 300 to 500 -foot wide mangrove forest. This BDE is necessary to avoid impacts to the mangroves. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed dock is not located within a navigable channel. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion not met. The mangrove shoreline alone occupies 25 percent of the width of the waterway. The MHWL is also located within the mangrove area. However, the proposed dock facility has been designed so as to leave at least 50 percent of the navigable waterway open. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. According to the drawings and information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed dock facility will allow use of neighboring docks. Secondary Criteria: 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. According to the application, the shoreline where the dock facility is proposed has dense mangrove vegetation (300 to 500 -foot width) and ephermal seagrass beds. The alternate location, Water Turkey Bay, would require more dredging because of its shallower water depth. This leaves the applicant with the option of proposing a dock facility along the man-made Vanderbilt Channel which requires a boat dock extension. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 8of14 excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. As shown on the drawings submitted by the petitioner, the proposed main access deck and finger piers are not excessive and allow access to the vessels for loading/unloading and routine maintenance. 3. For single - family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion is not applicable as this is not a single - family dock facility but a multi- family dock facility. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. According to information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed dock facility will not impact the view of the neighboring property owners. The neighboring properties across the channel to the west will still have a view of the water and channel. While their view of the mangrove shoreline will change, they will still have views of the mangroves from the upper floors of the condominiums. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(J) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) According to the information submitted by the petitioner, seagrass beds are located along the outer edge of the mangrove fringe. Without a Boat Dock Extension, the proposed docks would impact a majority of the seagrass beds, which are parallel to the shoreline for a majority of the proposed docks. In order to minimize impacts, the docks are proposed to be built five (5) feet west (water ward) of the existing sea grass beds. The docks are being placed to maintain navigability of the waterway and impact as little of the seagrass beds as possible. The petitioner has indicated that proposed design will impact approximately 0.002 acres of sea grasses (a 1 percent impact on 0.52 acres of seagrass beds). Given the above, the docks meet the intent of the criterion by minimizing impacts to seagrass beds. In order to minimize impacts to seagrass beds, the petitioner has indicated that they will adhere to LDC section 5.03.06. (J) 3. a -d. The Dunes boat dock plan Section B- B, states that the width of the dock will be adjusted at time of construction, if seagrasses are located within 10 linear feet of the dock. This has been added as Condition of Approval number 5. Staff will review the plans at time of Site BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 9 of 14 Development Plan and Building Permit to verify that LDC section 5.03.06 (J) is followed. The petitioner proposes the following to minimize impacts to the ephemeral seagrass beds that occasionally grow in this area: • The boat dock facility will be located as far away from the shoreline as possible to protect the mangrove shoreline and the areas where seagrass growth is most likely to occur. • The boat dock facility will be constructed as a fixed wooden structure rather than a concrete floating structure. This will minimize the dredging that is required. The fixed wooden structure will also maximize the amount of light penetration under the docks to the seagrass beds. • The perpendicular mooring will be bow in only, keeping the boat propellers as far away as possible from the shoreline to reduce the potential of propeller dredging and turbidity plumes associated with mooring. • The portion of the access walkway to the dock facility that crosses over the ephemeral seagrass bed will be constructed of aluminum or other metal grating to allow for the maximum light penetration to the seagrass beds. • The Dredging Plan includes underwater rip -rap support. Post project monitoring will be conducted to determine seagrass bed impacts. Restoration, if needed, shall be in accordance with Condition of Approval number 3. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. The Manatee Protection Plan has three protection rankings: Preferred; Moderate; and Protected. The project qualifies for a moderate ranking according to the Manatee Protection Plan. This ranking criterion allows up to 10 boat slips for every 100 feet of shoreline. There are approximately 9467 linear feet of shoreline, which would allow a maximum of 946 wet slips. With the submitted information and current data available, construction of 49 slips is consistent with the Manatee Protection Plan. Please note the applicant stated in their application that they believe the project qualifies for a preferred ranking. Although staff disagrees with a preferred ranking, the proposed number of wet slips is well below the number that is permitted with a moderate ranking. BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 10 of 14 For comparison, a Manatee Protection Plan ranking of "preferred" allows a density of 18 boat slips for every 100 feet of shoreline. If that ranking applied, then a maximum of 1704 boat slips could be permitted. A ranking of "protected" allows a density of 1 boat slip for every 100 feet of shoreline. If that ranking applied, then a maximum of 95 boat slips could be permitted. Boathouse Criteria: 1. Whether the boathouse would be set back a minimum of 15 feet from the side property /riparian lines. Criterion met. The dock is a minimum of 45 feet from the nearest side yard property line. 2. Whether the boathouse would protrude no more than 25 percent of the waterway width or 20 feet, whichever is less. Criterion not met. The mangrove shoreline alone occupies 25 percent of the width of the waterway. The MHWL is also located within the mangrove area. However, the proposed dock facility has been designed so as to leave at least 50 percent of the navigable waterway open. 3. Whether the boathouse would be no more than 15 feet in height. Criterion met. According to "The Dunes Section D -D" drawing submitted by the petitioner, the boathouse height will not exceed 15 feet. 4. Whether the construction of the boathouse would result in more than one boathouse or covered structure on the subject dock facility. Criterion met. According to information submitted by the petitioner, there is one boathouse /covered structure located at the northern end of the dock facility. 5. Whether the boathouse would be open on all four sides. Criterion met. According to the drawings submitted by the petitioner, the boathouse /covered structure will be open on all four sides. 6. Whether the roof of the boathouse would match the roof of the principal structure or be of a "chickee" or palm frond style Criterion met. According to "The Dunes Section D -D" drawing submitted by the petitioner, the roof of the boathouse will match the roof of the principal structure. BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 11 of 14 Staff analysis indicates that the request meets four of the five primary criteria, five of the six secondary criteria and that the proposed boathouse complies with five of the six requirements. While all six of the boathouse criteria must be met, the boathouse /covered structure meets the intent of Criteria number 2 in that it avoids impact to the mangrove area while maintaining 50 percent of an open waterway. Therefore, it is Staff's opinion that the boathouse /covered structure has met all six of the boathouse criteria. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the CCPC takes action, an aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to the Board of Zoning Appeals. Such appeal shall be filed with the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator within 30 days of the action by the CCPC. In the event that the petition has been approved by the CCPC, the applicant shall be advised that he /she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30 -day period. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office has reviewed the staff report for BDE- PL2010 -979, revised on February 21, 2012. -HFAC STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, Staff recommends that the CCPC approve Petition BDE - 2010-979 with the following conditions: The Conservation Easement, attached as Exhibit "D" to this Resolution, from Owner to Collier County as described in Sections 4.5 and 5.10 of Ordinance number 2000 -74, the Dunes PUD, shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County at time of building permit application free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except for conservation easements to other governmental agencies. This boat dock extension shall not be effective until the date of recordation of the Conservation Easement in the public records of Collier County. 2. As required by the section 3.2.3.1 Wiggins Pass Area of the Manatee Protection Plan dated May, 1995 and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners: "the waters of the Wiggins Pass area are very shallow, on average less than 5 feet at Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). The Army Corps of Engineers designed the Wiggins Pass System for 3 -foot draft vessels, and current maintenance dredging permits are based on the 3 -foot draft design. All marina or multi -dock facilities should advise their patrons of this potential draft limitation. Provisions should be made for posting the draft limitations on nautical charts, in notices to mariners and possible signs at the pass entrance." BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 12 of 14 Therefore, boats at this multi -dock facility shall have no more than a 3 -foot draft. 3. Prior to Site Development Plan approval, Owner shall provide a Construction Management and Restoration Plan to address the submerged marine habitat by providing for: construction techniques to limit turbidity and sedimentation of seagrass beds; and provision for other recreated submerged habitat such as using rip -rap to create substrate for colonization of oysters. 4. The boat docks are limited to the use of the residents of the Dunes Planned Unit Development. There shall be no commercial use and/or shuttle use of the boat docks. 5. Where a docking facility is built within 10 feet of seagrass beds, the following conditions shall be met: a. The dock shall be at a height of at least 3.5 feet NGVD. b. The terminal platform area of the dock shall not exceed 160 square feet. C. The access dock shall not exceed a width of 4 feet subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) provisions. d. The access dock and terminal platform shall be sited to impact the smallest area of seagrass beds possible. 6. Seagrass beds are dynamic in nature and the exact footprint of seagrass beds will be determined by owner between March 15 and October 15 (Seagrass Bed Growing Season). Owner shall submit a written survey performed during the most recent Seagrass Bed Growing Season by a licensed environmental professional, prior to issuance of the county building permit. BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 13 of 14 PREPARED BY: U AAM�` & NANCY Gt$DiACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPART NT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: RAY ND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES iA�' - LLIAM D. LO Z JR., , DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APP D BY: NICK CASALA GUI , DE UTY ADMINISTRATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION MARK P. STRAIN, CHAIRMAN Attachments: A: November 14, 2000 BCC minutes B: Letters of objection C: Letters of support D: Resolution E: Future Land Use Consistency Review Memo BDE- PL2010 -979, 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE February 22, 2012 Page 14 of 14 C O� =-A O - - 2--(4-12- DATE a)-- .2-1 - Zv (,Z- DATE 2 -Z2 - Iz DATE DATE November 14, 2000 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Naples, Florida, November 14, 2000 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners, in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: James D. Carter, Ph.D Barbara B. Berry David E. Brandt Pamela S. Mac`Kie ALSO PRESENT: Tom 011iff, County Manager David Weigel, County Attorney Page 1 Attachment A November 14, 2000 MS. BISHOP: Karen Bishop. We truly have not done any plans for this dock facility yet. I'm going to remind everyone here that I would have to go back to two environmental agencies that are public- notice agencies, the Corps and the district, to get these docks approved, so there is more public notice in place. 1 can tell you that we will not build docks in water of Turkey Bay or anywhere north of there, that our dock facilities will stay within the canal area of what's already existing of the man -made canal. We have agreed to put water of -- waters of Tucker bay into conservation, which means we will not build anything there, no docks, no nothing, so right now we have no plan. 1 can tell you that the number that we've been discussing is somewhere in the 60 range. Now, whether or not I can get that permitted, we haven't even begun that process, so we don't know. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: How many units will you have? MS. BISHOP: 1 think about 640 units. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: So -- MS. BISHOP: We may have -- 10 percent of the units would have docks. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: 1 could see Mr. Lydon being worried if you were going to have hundreds of docks. MS. BISHOP: And if I was going to go into water of Turkey Bay. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: That, I would die. MS. BISHOP: Right, but we are not doing that. We have agreed to that, we are going to put that under conservation forever, that no one ever will ever do that. MR. NINO: Got it -- 10 slips for every 100 feet of shoreline. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: And how many feet do they have? MS. BISHOP: Oh, a couple miles. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: No, this -- the canal. MS. BISHOP: Well, actually, it's all your shoreline, so it starts in the canal and goes around, but we can -- this canal is probably about -- I want to say about half a mile maybe, is it, a quarter of a mile? One inch equals 120, so it's about 1200 feet, 2,000, somewhere between 1200 and 2000 feet. Page 196 November 14, 2000 MR. NINO: And we think it's rather- academic, because, as Bob says, we don't think the DEP would ever tolerate that kind of development. MS. BISHOP: And you've got to physically fit them in there. 1 mean, this is a math thing too. You can't just throw 100 docks in there if you can't actually get a boat in between them. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: And I know how hard it is to get those permits from the DEP and the Army Corps, so -- MS. BISHOP: Right, and they're building docks across the way, too, at the Landings, so -- we'd be glad to limit ourself to 60 docks if that`s what you would like. CHAIRMAN CARTER: You have to go through a public hearing process. MS. BISHOP: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN CARTER: And based on your record of working with the community, in my experience, with this project, I would have an expectation that you would make sure that they were all duly notified so they could participate with you, and perhaps even before you go to a public hearing, you may sit down with the community leadership that's most affected and discuss with them what your anticipation is and let them make an input. MS. BISHOP: Yes, sir, 1 would anticipate that would be the direction that we have taken already, that we would do that again. Also, all the property owners that would be surrounding this property would be notified, and based on the networking I've seen happen in that neighborhood, if one knows, everybody knows. So 1 would imagine that there's no possible way 1 could do anything without the neighborhood being aware of that at this point. CHAIRMAN CARTER: Well, 1 guess 1 would like the principal just to step to the microphone and make that commitment that you would do that, and it will be a part of public record so that there's never any confusion. MR. GRIFFIN: .ferry Griffin, Signature Communities. Yes, we'll do that, and we will limit it, if we ever do get them, to 60, and we will put covenants that we'll never go into the Turkey Bay lagoon -- COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: That's a good -- Page 197 November 14, 2000 MR. GRIFFIN: --in perpetuity. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: And that's, a real positive trade -off, nothing in Turkey Bay. MS. BISHOP: Okay. Now, the last thing I wanted to address is the preserves. When you permit these preserves at the agencies, there has to be, even though we as the developer start the permitting process, there has to be an entity that's going to be there forever, and theoretically, the homeowners association is one of those "forever" kind of things. It's obviously dynamic and changes people, but as a part of condominium law, you have to put under -- in reserves the amount of money necessary to handle things like maintenance and all those things. So once you clean these wetlands out -- and they are in pristine area, they really don't need that much maintenance in the big scheme. It's the areas that have been impacted before, where you've had Australian pines and those kinds of things where you're revegetating. Those are the areas that really need more maintenance, because they're not -- they haven't taken root like some of the other mangrove areas. So actually as the property -- as those areas become mature, the amount of maintenance becomes less, mostly on the fringes of those areas. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Karen, won't your permits have perpetual conditions? MS. BISHOP: Forever. COMMISSIONER MAWKIE: And those will be monitored and enforced by the DEP and the Army Corps? MS. BISHOP: The Corps of Engineers as well as South Florida Water Management. So 1 have no choice. There is no opportunity to let these things fall by the wayside. And we would love to give them to some entity that would love to have them, like a little conservancy group in this area, we'd love for them to have those, so if you guys know anyone, call us. CHAIRMAN CARTER: Motion from the Board. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: Close the public hearing. CHAIRMAN CARTER: Close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER MAC'KIE: I'll make a motion to approve subject to all of the conditions that have been put on the record Page 198 5/25/10 # RECEIVED ` 1 } NsIAY 2 8 2010 ZONING DEPARTMENT To: Mr Ray Bellows Zoning Manager, Comprehensive Development & Environmental Services Collier County Government 2800 N Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Fla 34104 Dear Mr Bellows, Re: Dunes of North Naples - Cayman Bldg We are the Board of Directors of the Cayman Bldg (Bldg #3) within the Dunes master community. Our facility and property was turned over to our 84 owners in 2004 from our Developer ( Signature Properties ) and we now operate as our own Condo Assn. The reason for our letter to you is to record our objections to selected aspects of our Developer's future, proposed marina plan. Previously, our Board of Directors was made aware of a Master Plan drawing revision # 16 in April , 2010 submitted to the Collier County Growth Mgmt Division. Our original correspondence on this was sent to Ms Willoughby on 5/19/10. She has since responded that the drawing has been changed yet again. Regardless of the revision number and / or when the Developer's final plan will be submitted for final approval, we feel it necessary to voice our objections as they relate to the safety and well being of our 84 owners. The Dunes Developer has a specific intent to put a marina on the Dunes site. If such a marina will exist, then there will inherently have to be access from the marina site on the water to connect with the owners within the Dunes community. The physical location of this access between the marina and the 8 Buildings within the master community is the basis of our objections. Heretofore, any drawings we have seen that outlines the location and accessibility of the proposed marina offers a boardwalk and paver path, and runs from the water along a line between Bldgs 3 & 4. However, the only entrance and exit of this boardwalk and paver path, dumps both into and onto the property lines and parking lot of Bldg 3 (Cayman). Overall, we are not opposed to the Developer establishing a marina on Dunes property. We are, however, opposed to locating the boardwalk and paver path directly on our property when there are other solutions. Attachment B Our objections are based on the following issues that we feel would adversely affect both the safety and well being of our 84 owners and their families and guests : 1) The proposed boardwalk and paver path is planned to be built substantially on the private property of Cayman. There, however, is clearly more than ample and sufficient space to continue the boardwalk on a similar course / direction apart from our private property and on a similar path with the "common" property of the preserve. The preserve area is where the boardwalk is planned. It should stay within the preserve area entirely. 2) Our 84 - resident Cayman Bldg has 84 parking spaces inside our building and an almost equal number located outside and all within our property's boundaries. The planned boardwalk, if allowed to be built on the private property of Cayman, will have its only entry and exit points directly into our parking lot. This reduction of already - limited parking spots will be a hardship on our owners and guests by no longer offering an adequate number of parking spots. Our only option would be to then seek the usage of parking on the private property of yet another privately owned Dunes building. It is our feeling that our residents should not be penalized with too limited parking because the Developer decided to encroach onto our property without any input on the consequences our owners would be faced with. 3) Our building has 2 garage -door entrances. The planned boardwalk, with its planned entry / exit into our most eastern parking lot, will become a potential traffic hazard as fully one half of all our owners come and go from our eastern garage entrance - - - -- which is almost directly in front of the boardwalk entrance / exit. With the planned boardwalk, there may be extensive foot or vehicle traffic emanating from the 634 owners within the entire community going to and from the boardwalk. Accordingly, our owners who are entering or exiting our own garage, as well as the numerous deliveries being made thru the garage by contractors, will now be at risk of being responsible for yielding to all this new foot and vehicular traffic coming to access the boardwalk. This scenario of potentially 634 Dunes residents coming onto our Dunes Cayman property to park, to walk, to gain access to the boardwalk seems to suggest that there may be serious and unnecessary chance of risk of injury, congestion, and lack of safe access to our own residences. In summary we understand the Developer's desire to install a boardwalk for everyone to be able to gain access to the planned marina. However, we feel that if the boardwalk is built actually "on" our Cayman private property as planned, it will inherently create an unsafe and unnecessary hardship on the 84 owners of Dunes Cayman building. It is our suggestion to position the boardwalk entirely within the preserve area and offer its entrance and exit onto the common property owned by the entire master community, where there is common parking,no obstruction of any existing garage traffic flow, no loss of existing limited parking spaces, and no negative impact on any one group of residents. We respectfully request that your office, the Collier County Comprehensive Development & Environmental Services Division consider our objections as stated within , and redirect the positioning of any planned boardwalk to where it is parallel to, but not on or into, the private property of Dunes Cayman. We further request that you please forward this letter of objections to any other Collier County activity that might be involved in approving any marina / boardwalk plan to be submitted by the Dunes Developer at any time in the future. Given the numerous times the Developer's site plan has been submitted for revision, coupled with the high probability that it will need further revisions to additionally accommodate the planned marina / boardwalk, we fear that we will be unable to be made aware of all of these future revisions. But if the marina / boardwalk plan is submitted to Collier County by the Dunes Developer for approval, we ask for Collier County government be mindful of our objections and do everything it can to negotiate the satisfactory conclusion we have proposed. Thank you in advance for your consideration and understanding. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call. Bill Schaefer - President, Dunes III Cayman Condo Association till= ee r' Nt (i-i, c, m at il.crt� 248 -515 -0312 CC -- Ms Christine Willoughby ( Growth Mgmt Division - Collier County) GundlachNancy From: StrainMark Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 6:37 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Dunes Marina for your records /distribution Mark From: David Grey [ipsw @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:52 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Dunes Marina Dear Sir: I am OPPOSED to the Marina Project at the Dunes. I live at the Dunes, 285 Grande Way Unit #905. S/ David Grey David Grey Grey Investments, LLC Family Fiduciary Services, Inc. W 978 - 922 -0050 M 978 - 412 -7777 Under, Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 GundtachNancy From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:42 PM To: DeselemKay Subject: FW: Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 Attachments: Map2.jpg; Map4B.jpg; Map5B.jpg FYI, it appears this was already sent to the CCPC, but I ma not sure you have it, or need it, for the packet. thanks, Mark From: Susan Snyder [ssnyderl02 @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 4:09 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 January 28, 2012 Dear Mark, I sent the following letter to you and all of the other CCPC Commissioners, so you do not need to distribute it to others unless you so choose. I received a letter today indicating that there is a CCPC public hearing planned on February 16, 2012 to discuss Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 which involves a request for an insubstantial change determination to the Dunes Planned Unit Development Master Plan for the purpose of removing the Conservation Easement designation in the waterway and depicting the area for construction of a 49- wet slip boat dock facility. I wrote to you several weeks ago with my opinion about why I feel that this is not an insubstantial change and why a dock extension should not be allowed. In this e-mail, I'd like to show you with three attachments that the Conservation Easement that is being discussed has been promised many times to the state of Florida and Collier County for variances, an Environmental Resource Permit, and a submerged Land Lease. It was only after this Conservation Easement was promised, that these variances, permits, etc have been granted. How can it be construed as an insignificant change in the PUD to take back a promised Conservation Easement. That certainly isn't in the best interest of Collier County residents and visitors and would set a very poor precedent for other developers promising Conservation Easements and then reneging on the promise after they get what they want from the county and state. I hope you will consider my comments in your decision. Sincerely, Susan Leach Snyder 17 Bluebill Ave. Naples, 34108 1 [cid:i580FB20A- 2FB1 -42BA- 8687- 83325775728F @local] [cid:,4A6CF462- 65C7 -44C6- 9798- 290A9822B6A0@local] [cid:BFB96C85- 8349- 49EA- 9F79- 10B0356D7D1D@local] Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 APPRO)"TIELY 1, FEET OF SW3KUN 8WTHOIFFISHWO PIER PR07wm By PAWNE CCKSMA110N immimi 164AT ALLCWS hK *FMM A W r 40 )WEM uW4A a � Argo f N I I W ftFUMrfE0VVWE SCARDWALK W AOM GMUND UEVEL TO MWMAZE W%cm �'I WAGNO ww"'t Tm- 277 DRAM W. A m"m awn.. CRUTM CH 4!4* kA AKLA UNUtK 5 1 ANLN%PW PA CONSERVATION EASEMENT M BE WA DEEDED TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES SECTION -2 TCAAft8"IP-499 RANGE�J::-25F- --65.86 ACRES AREA TO BE QUITCLAIMED TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES -64.30 ACRES INDICATES LIMITS OF PROPOSED I'PROPRIETARY CONSERVATION EASEMENT ftFUMrfE0VVWE SCARDWALK W AOM GMUND UEVEL TO MWMAZE W%cm �'I WAGNO ww"'t Tm- 277 DRAM W. A m"m awn.. CRUTM CH 4!4* kA &CALL PA Jolmo.: iffs WA SECTION -2 TCAAft8"IP-499 RANGE�J::-25F- OFSHMME m (W Fwwo PROTEarwDy WE 19ttVAnM 14M THAT 2 raA I 46x 0).Z --- lot AREA UlMUtK 3TANUARD CONSERVATION EASEMENT TO BE DEEDED 70 BOARD OF TRUSTEES -65.86 ACRES PEAWtHoarwoe BOARDWALK W AOM QMDUNDLEVELTO MINPAZE WPACM M -r H FM M U " FEE 4S Turd, M ATTACHMEN71 imAwmRmnl=m== rimcamwaim hrmm643.w2 4 U oftimm T.T.T. mwvqmm TAM WWII WOOD is osma lamr 2 CRMTM .: mic a NiNo- IM 41740 am ka IWALL, M 91ECTION-2 TCYWNSHIP-488 FMNQ&--H25Q Collier County Growth Management Division; 02 -02 -12 RE: Petition BDE- PL2010 -979 I am an owner of a residence in the Dunes Complex. I am opposed to any variances to the boat dock project proposed at the site described. I am against any boat dock construction . I believe there will be a large impact on the eco- system. The contamination from boat fuel, lubricants and waste from the site alarms me. The increased traffic and construction will put a strain on an already strained site. The increased need for fresh water, disposal of human wastes, and general waste disposal all will cause an increased strain. The maintenance of all the boats. Cleaning and servicing will increase pollution to the area. As an owner I am also concerned about the increased traffic around our residences. Increased people traffic which could very well result in decreased security in our neighborhood. I believe the Dunes Complex is a strong tax base for Collier County. I am concerned that the marina will result in more problems than benefit to the residents. Thank You For Your Consideration, K Buitkus MD 315 Dunes Blvd 31007, Naples Florida 34110 6593 Minnow Pond Drive, West Bloomfield, MI. 48322 February 9, 2012 Kay & Dennis Murk 21 Bluebill Avenue, #1101B Naples, FL 49090 (239) 514 -3962 Collier County Growth Management Division - Planning & Regulation Department of Land Development Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Petition No BDE- PL2010 -979 Dunes Planned Unit Development Forty -Nine (49) Boat Slips To Whom and All It May Concern: First of all I want to thank you for your notice concerning the subject making my husband and myself aware of this matter. We strongly oppose anymore disruption of the peacefulness pristine waters, nature, sea life, especially the now almost - extinct Manatee (as this is a popular feeding and birthing area for the manatee and, of course, mangroves that provide food, beauty and hurricane protection. The proposed number of boat slips would absolutely cause major damage to the seawall where we live in Gulf Breeze at Vanderbilt, plus ruin what is left of peace and QUIET. This is a perfect quiet and safe waterway for canoers and paddle boarders and more powerboats that do not already adhere to the "No Wake Zone, " will make it that much more dangerous. From our personal experience, we know what we are talking about hearing the engines run at high speed at an adjacent marina and the owners paying no mind to the noise or smell their actions generate or the wake they generate. The proposed boat slips would narrow the channel and imperil more boat navigation. I prefer to watch and enjoy wonderful things of nature rather than the back or front end of a boat destroying a beautiful area. Page 2 The greed of these developers are ruining and changing the environment. Stop them NOW. As it is, it is almost too late. PLEASE... no more. And to mention, there are already many boat slips that aren't being used as it is in this area. We implore you to deny this request to add forty -nine (49) boat slips OR anymore boat slips, for that matter, save or waterway for its tranquility, it's sea life and for the fisherman, canoers and paddle boarders. Kay and Dennis Murk kaysoday @aol. com GundlachNancy From: StrainMark Sent. Tuesday, January 31, 2012 10:44 AM To: GundlachNancy; DeselemKay Subject: FW: Development Concerns Sorry for mixing it up, I will forward future ones to Nancy. Mark From: Thompson, Jay [JTHOMPSON@bsu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 7:02 AM To: StrainMark Subject: Development Concerns 31 January 2012 Mr. Mark P. Strain, Chair Collier County Planning Commission Re: Petition PDI -PL 2012 -159 Petition BDE- PL2010 -979 Dear Mark, We have read your newspaper columns during the past few years and have found you to be very fair and judicious regarding the issues you have written about. As the Chair of the Collier County Planning Commission that will review the above petitions, we ask you to review these petitions to determine if you judge the changes to be "insignificant" as per the County staff conclusion. We disagree with the County staff interpretation and believe the changes to be significant in light of the original PUD. We struggle to understand how these petitions are considered "insignificant changes" based upon the original PUD. As a homeowner within 500 feet of the proposed project we have been notified these petitions that will be heard by the Collier County Planning Commission. We hope that you oppose both changes in the petitions that you are scheduled to hear on 16 February 2012 at 9:00 A.M. Issue 1: Petition number PDI- PL2012 -159 for the purpose of removing the conservation easement to construct a 49 -boat slip marina in the narrow Vanderbilt Channel. This conservation easement has been used three times previously (with the County Commissioners, with the South Florida Water management District, and with the Governor's Cabinet for separate approvals). For a developer to use the same conservation easement in multiple cases and now request that the conservation easement be withdrawn seems unfair and unethical at best. The conservation easement would provide a needed shoreline requirement for the developer to request a 49 -dock marina. We request you deny this change and not remove the conservation easement. If not allowed, the shoreline calculation, based upon the developer's request, then would only allow a 28 -dock marina without the massive footprint of a larger marina /dock. However, even this small 28 -dock marina is legally questionable as to whether a developer can build in a conservation easement area. Finally these docks are not needed since multiple boat slips are readily available nearby on the Cocohatchee River on Vanderbilt Drive. Issue 2: Petition Number BDE- PL2010 -979 for a 261 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by the Land Development Code. If granted this would create an 11,300 square foot structure over the water. The Vanderbilt Channel is a narrow passage between the 111th 1 Street bridge on the south and Water Turkey Bay to the north. Extension of docks beyond the 20 feet allowed in the Land Development Code will create multiple problems in the Vanderbilt Channel for navigation within the channel, for our fragile sea wall on the west side of the channel, and for increased stress upon manatees and marine life in the area. We request you deny this requested dock extension and support the Land Development Code. Both of the above proposals were not part of the original PUD from the developer, but are significant changes in spite of being determined as "insignificant changes" by the County staff. We request that you visit the site to develop an understanding regarding our concerns. Such a visit will help you to make a judgment to determine if you can support these frivolous requests from the developer. The proposed changes from the original PUD create issues that are adverse to the important "quality of life issues" for those of us who reside on the west side of Vanderbilt Channel, the wildlife population in this area, and the quality of water in this "Outstanding Florida Water" estuary area. Thank you for giving consideration to our requests and denying these two petitions! If you wish to discuss this, please call us at our home as we would welcome the opportunity to discuss the above with you. Sincerely yours, Jay C. Thompson and Valerie A. Thompson 17 Bluebill Avenue Naples, Florida 34108 Telephone: 593 -0514 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 7 GundlachNancy From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 11:56 AM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Dunes Docks for your distribution Mark From: Kay Murk [kaysoday @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:07 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Dunes Docks February 9, 2012 Collier County Growth Management Division - Planning & Regulation Department of Land Development Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive <x - apple- data - detectors: //2> Naples, FL 34104<x- apple -data- detectors://2> Subject: Petition No. BDE- PL2010 -979 Dunes Planned Unit Development Forty -Nine (49) Boat Slips To Whom and All It May Concern: First of all I want to thank you for your notice concerning the subject making my husband and myself aware of this matter. We strongly oppose anymore disruption of the peacefulness- pristine waters, nature, sea life, especially the now almost- extinct Manatee (as this is a popular feeding and birthing area for the manatee and, of course, mangroves that provide food, beauty and hurricane protection. The proposed number of boat slips would absolutely cause major damage to the seawall where we live in Gulf Breeze at Vanderbilt, plus ruin what is left of peace and QUIET. This is a perfect quiet and safe waterway for canoers and paddle boarders and more powerboats that do not already adhere to the "No Wake Zone," will make it that much more dangerous. From our personal experience, we know what we are talking about hearing the engines run at high speed at an adjacent marina and the owners paying no mind to the noise or smell their actions generate or the wake they generate. The proposed boat slips would narrow the channel and imperil more boat navigation. I prefer to watch and enjoy wonderful things of nature rather than the back or front end of a boat destroying a beautiful area. The greed of these developers are ruining and changing the environment. Stop them NOW. As it is, it is almost too late. PLEASE ... no more. And to mention, there are already many boat slips that aren't being used as it is in this area. We implore you to deny this request to add forty -nine (49) boat slips OR anymore boat slips, for that matter, save or waterway for its tranquility, it's sea life and for the fisherman, canoers and paddle boarders. Thank you. Kay and Dennis Murk 21 Bluebill Avenue <x - apple- data - detectors: //2>, 1101 -B Naples, FL 34108<x- apple -data- detectors://3/0> kaysoday(@aol .com<mailto:kaysoday(@aol.com> Sent from my iPad Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2 Feb. 2, 2012 Charles W. Berkoben 15 Bluebill Ave. N0. 505 Naples, Florida 34108 Collier County Growth Management Division - Planning and Regulation Department of Land Development Services Zoning Services Section Re: Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 Attn: Nancy Gundlach I have objected to the approval of the boat dock facility since initially proposed by the Dunes Planned Unit Development and submit the following for your consideration in the decision to permit the construction of a 49 slip boat dock facility on the inland waterway southerly from "Turkey Bay" southerly from Wiggins Pass. The waterway in this area is a relatively narrow channel, which could create hazardous conditions in maneuvering/docking in adding to the boat traffic from existing boating facilities southerly in the Vanderbilt Beach community. This entire waterway southerly from Turkey Bay is "dead end" and receives "flushing" only from tidal action. The addition of fairly large boats, for which the size of the docks is proposed, will add substantially to pollution of this waterway. Boats of the size to be accommodated by the proposed docks have overboard discharge facilities for waste water, "sewage" waste. In my prior reviews of the proposed facility, I saw no provision for any land based facility to dispose of waste, particularly "sewage "! Also a question regarding destruction of the mangroves to provide access to the proposed docks. Should not the dock facility development plan include land access and effects on the environment. I earnestly request your review of potential detrimental environmental effects and potential hazardous boating traffic conditions in your considerations. Respectfully, Id, Charles W. Berkoben Mary L February 2, 2012 �nkbiner Collier County Growth Management Division - Planning & Regulation Department of Land Development Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Petition No. BDE- PL2010 -979 Dunes Planned Unit Development Forty-Nine (49) Boat Slips Gentlemen: Thank you for your notice concerning the subject making me aware of this matter. I strongly oppose anymore disruption of the pristine waters, nature, sea life and, of course, mangroves that provide food, beauty and hurricane protection. The proposed boat slips would absolutely cause major damage to the seawall where I live in Gulf Breeze plus ruin what is left of peace and QUIET. I know what I am talking about hearing the engines run at high speed at an adjacent marina and the owners paying no mind to the noise or smell their actions generate. The proposed boat slips would narrow the channel and imperil more boat navigation. I prefer to watch and enjoy wonderful things of nature rather than the back or front end of a boat destroying a beautiful area. The greed of these developers are ruining and changing the environment. Stop them NOW. As it is, it is almost too late. PLEASE ... no more. I implore you to deny this request to add forty -nine (49) boat slips OR anymore boat slips. Thank you. Mary L. Finkbiner ,21 erlo 4ii & A vei . #11046 Nail& FL 34-109-1765' (2.3q) S97 -1111 • E- MaZ&'y��f` C a PAoH (23-7) 860 -1034 GundlachNancy From: StrainMark Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 12:44 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: CCPT meeting 2 -16 -12 for your records Mark From: lack Dekkinga [dekky111 @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 10:12 AM To: BroughamPhil; HomiakKaren; SchifferBrad; Vonier Bill; bmk(@bmkre.com; lodiebert(@comcast.com; melissahern(a)colliergov.net; pmidney(@collier.org; StrainMark; EastmaTh(@collier.K12.fl.us Subject: CCPT meeting 2 -16 -12 February 9, 2012 Re: Dunes Dock Project Dear Commissioners, I would like to express my disapproval of the Dunes project. As a naturalist I object to the destruction of habitat present in the mangroves. In spite of the efforts to maintain the mangroves, the presence of boat docks and human traffic will dramatically change the number and variety of wildlife we now appreciate. My other concern, aside from the loss of esthetic value, is the congestion that will be present at the mouth of the boat basin opposite the project. In windy conditions the turn into the basin, with other boat traffic present, for larger boats will be difficult. This is a safety concern. Please protect Florida's wildlife, safety, and esthetics with your reconsideration of this ill advised proposal. Sincerely, lack A. Dekkinga, M.D. Gulf Breeze at Vanderbilt Sent from my Vad Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 GundlachNancy From: StrainMark Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 12:46 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Dune Docks more for your records Mark From: Larry Van Camp Van Camp [vancampl @sbcglobal.net] Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 10:46 AM To: BroughamPhil; HomiakKaren; SchifferBrad; Vonier Bill; Barry M. Klein; Diane D. Ebert; AhernMelissa; Paul Midney; StrainMark; Thomas Eastman Subject: Dune Docks February 8, 2012 To:Philip E. Broughamb,Karen Homiak, Brad Schiffer , William H. Vonier Barry M. Klein, Diane D. Ebert, Melissa G. Ahern, Paul Midney, Mark P. Strain, Thomas Eastman Subject: Dune Docks My wife and I have owned property in the Baker Carroll Point since 1987. We have been full time residents since 1997. We have a real concern with the docks being proposed and some of the agreements Signature Properties made with the State and other authorities over the years. The Dunes project originally agreed to a number of conditions that, in turn, enabled them to build their high rise units. They offered protection to the conservation of the Turkey Bay and waterway areas. According to the new proposal, Signature Properties continues to modify their request and increase their presence in the water right -away. The new proposal extends the docks further into the channel. This will narrow the boat traffic moving it more towards the Gulf Breeze seawall. Kayaks and smaller boats will now be endangered by wake turbulence from the larger boats if they are in the channel at the same time. You also have to consider the presence of oil residue, gasoline or fuel oil in the waterway due to the watercraft. This will affect any existing wild and sea life that is present in the channel. It is sad to say that money talks. No concern has been given to those living close to the area or what was originally.proposed. I would hope that everyone would look deeper into what is happening and make the proper call to put a stop to this project. It is not right to move forward and approve this proposed revision. Thank you. Sincerely, Larry and Judy Van Camp 25 Bluebill Ave A305 Naples, F1 34108 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Collier County Growth Management Division; 02 -02 -12 RE: Petition BDE- PL2010 -979 I am an owner of a residence in the Dunes Complex. I am opposed to any variances to the boat dock project proposed at the site described. I am against any boat dock construction . I believe there will be a large impact on the eco- system. The contamination from boat fuel, lubricants and waste from the site alarms me. The increased traffic and construction will put a strain on an already strained site. The increased need for freshwater, disposal of human wastes, and general waste disposal all will cause an increased strain. The maintenance of all the boats. Cleaning and servicing will increase pollution' to the area. As an owner I am also concerned about the increased traffic aroulnd our residences. Increased people traffic which could very well result in decreaO.ed security in our neighborhood. I believe the Dunes Complex is a strong tax basd�for Collier County. I am concerned that the marina will result in.more problems than i benefit to the residents. Thank You For Your Considerations, / Xv i "' !w i K Buitkus MD 315 Dunes Blvd 31007, Naples Florida 34110 6593 Minnow Pond Drive, West Bloomfield, MI. 48322 21 Bluebill Avenue - #802B Naples, FL 34108 -1765 February 1, 2012 Collier County Growth Management Division Planning & Regulation Department of Land Development Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Petition No. BDE- PL2010 -979 Dunes Planned Unit Development Forty Nine(49) Boat Slips To Whom It May Concern: This letter expresses our profound concern in the matter of Petition No. BDE- PL2010 -979. We implore any and everyone involved with the proposed plans for building docks housing 49 boat slips to deny this request. First would be ugly docks /slips, next would be lifts to protect the boat bottoms from barnacles, etc. then canvas canopies to protect the boats from the sun. A thing of the past is beautiful boats gently floating in the waters. NO, they have to be raised for their protection and spoil our nature and view. This area is one of the very few left to enjoy the sights and sounds of wildlife and the wonderful birds feeding at the mangrove's edge. Disruption of this beautiful site would be a travesty. Again, we ask that this application be stopped NOW. There would be nothing left to enjoy for all who live at Baker Carol Point. Those who would choose to dock their boats in the proposed area can go elsewhere to store their boats as many of us have done. Kindly consider this matter carefully and not be a party to more developer voraciousness. They, the developers, do not care one iota for anything but money. HELP US PLEASE! Respectfully, � P /1;, U/y i „Q 1lis Rosemond Mel Rosemond 21 Bluebill Avenue Unit #104B Naples, FL 34108 February 2, 2012 Collier County Growth Management Division Planning & Regulation Department of Land Development Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Petition No. BDE- PL2010 -979 Dunes Planned Unit Development Forty -Nine (49) Boat Slips To Whom It May Concern: Please stop any further development of boat docks as outlined in the subject. This would be a travesty to disrupt or to change this natural environment enjoyed by so many. Developers only care about one thing and that is MONEY. That is what this is all about. We daily, weather permitting, enjoy our time sitting by this proposed channel watching and enjoying the sights of sea life, birds feeding their young, including manatees and dolphins feeding and jumping. These are awesome sights and are directly in the area of the proposed building of boat slips /docks. The proposed application is an absolute slap against Mother Nature and our pleasure. Please consider us as opposing this venture and we implore you to deny the Dunes Petition No. BDEPL2010 -979 request to building boat docks. Sincerely, 1 Chris me Heinz Martin Heinz r' GundlachNancy From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 2:09 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Dunes Proposed Marina Item #BDE- PL2010 -979 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged More for your distribution Mark From: Nancy Mcfarland [mcf445 @bluegrass.net] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:07 PM To: PhilBrogham @colliergov.net; HomiakKaren; SchifferBrad; Vonier Bill; bmk@bmkre.com; jodiebert@comcast.net; AhernMelissa; pmidney@collier.org,; StrainMark; EastmaTh collier.kl2ftus Subject: Dunes Proposed Marina Item #BDE- PL2010 -979 Dear Commissioners: I cannot believe that I am writing again concerning this proposed project. I have written so many times stating why this marina should not be allowed. I know that you know all of the previous reasons, so I will be brief. The channel is too narrow to have a large marina for safety reasons, navigational reasons (other boats passing through the channel), recreational reasons (the use of the area by kayaks, canoes, etc.). This is a hazard for all wildlife, including manatees. It will be a noise issue for all of the condos that are close by. But now the most important reason why this should be allowed. The Signature Group has changed their request from taking 25% of the narrow channel to 50%! This greatly increases the reasons for not permitting the project. This is a substantial change to the original concept. This must not be permitted! We originally purchased our home here because of the untouched waterway and mangrove preserve. Now we are looking at the large Dunes complex. Please do not destroy the waterway also. Thank you for your consideration. Mr. and Mrs. R. Douglas McFarland 21 Blue Bill Avenue 1003 and 303 Naples, FL 34108 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 GundlachNanc From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 6:58 AM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FVN: Dunes Docks Marina: Resolution PDI- PL2012 -159 & Resolution BDE- PL2010 -979 for your distribution /files. Mark From: Coleman, Dulcie [d.v.coleman @imperial.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 12:09 AM To: StrainMark Subject: Dunes Docks Marina Resolution PDI- PL2012 -159 & Resolution BDE- PL2010 -979 Dear Commissioner Strain, Re:Dunes Boat Dock Extension Resolution PDI- PL2012 -159 & Resolution BDE- PL2010 -979 My husband and I wish to put on record our objection to Resolution BDE- PL2010 -979, which will enable Signature to build 49 Docks as part of the development of the Dunes Docks Marina . We also object to Resolution PDI- PL2012 -159 which seeks to permit Signature to remove the Conservation Easement from its planned development master plan for the Dune Docks Marina My husband and I object very strongly to the above Resolutions on the following grounds 1.The additional docks will add significantly to the number of boats in the already narrow channel leading into Wiggins pass and make passage more crowded, more difficult and more dangerous . 2.The additional traffic will undoubtedly cause additional damage the flora and fauna of the Dune Docks Marina by causing swell and erosion of the sea walls . 3. Resolution BDE - PL2010 -159 asks for a permit to build 49 docks which will protrude 281 feet from the mean high water line. This will block nearly 50% of an already narrow overcrowded channel 4. Dredging will adversely affect the integrity of the sea wall and create costly repairs for the property owners. 5. The removal of the Conservation Easement will adversely effect the Vanderbilt Bay environment which has been identified as Outstanding Florida Water and is meant to be protected -not destroyed! We sincerely request that you consider the effect these Resolutions will have on the community when you come to cast your vote. Yours sincerely Dulcie and lack Poznansky,10851 Gulfshore Drive, Naples 34108 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 GundlachNanc From: StrainMark Sent: Friday, February 03, 201212:33 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Fwd: Dunes Docks for your distribution /files Mark From: davew [davew@hoagandsons.com] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 10:32 AM To: Dave Wilutis; info@hoagandsons.com Cc: BroughamPhil; HomiakKaren; SchifferBrad; SchifferBrad; bmk@bmkre.com; jodiebert @comcast.net; AhernMelissa; pmidney @collier.org; StrainMark; EastmaTh @collier.kl2.fl.us Subject: Re: Fwd: Dunes Docks I am a owner in Surf Colony III. Regarding the permitting process related to The Dunes docks, I have a couple of concerns about the County's past actions related to The Dunes docks and an adjacent marina development. Back in July 2008, the Surf Colony owners had requested proper permitting to enhance /add additional boat slips within the existing marina. This marina was in place back in the 60's. As a requirement to get this permit, THE COUNTY required that NO stored boats could extend into the channel waterway. IN addition and MOST importantly, the County in a email drom Ashley Caserta of Collier government, dated July 7, 2008 to Rocky Scofield from Turrell, Hall & Associates, stated that if the Surf Colony request for the permit is to be granted, the Surf Colony properties will have to sign a document stating that the Surf Colony group will waive any future rights to building dockage in the cjannel waterway. HOW CAN THIS BE! You had forced our group to waive our reparion rights in order for us to get a permit to enhance the little marina, something that was already in place. But yet you grated the Dunes group excessive use of the channel for their needs. YOU need to explain this thinking to us. You barred us from any future use of the channel waterway, but yet you grant excessive use to The Dunes to a waterway, everyone in SW Florida share. IF granted, The Dunes will now have exclusive use of near 50% of that waterway. Have any of the county been on the water in this channel. If not, I'd suggest, as doing your proper due diligence, you should. You need to sit in the middle of the channel, hopefully during a busy boating day. Now, try to envision what that channel would look like, with close to 50% of that waterway gone. Any business person, would create a test model so they can see all aspects of the project they are soon to decide on. You should do the same. Dave Wilutis On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:40:03 +0000, Dave Wilutis wrote > Sent from my Droid Charge on Verizon 4GLTE > - - - - -- Original Message----- - > From: Susan Snyder <ssnyderl02 @comcast.net> > To: "Jewel Rhoades" <JewelannR @aol.com >, "Jill Denherder" 1 > <jkdenherder @yahoocom>, "R & R Rittermeyer" <ritterl @mchsi.com>, "Dave > Wilutis" <Wilutis @comcast.net>, "Lee Knudsen" > <Lee.Knudsen @comcast.net>, "Joe Mudarri" <JSTOCKS111 @COMCAST.Net>, > "Pamdg" <pgencarella @cox.net>, "Georgia Charnas" <geocha88 @att.net>, > "Sharon Beekoben" <srgolfwidow@aol.com>, "Tony Beranek" > <TBERANEKI @aol.com>, "Olya Popowych" <opopowych @comcast.net>, "Bill > Shafer" <shafer55m@comcast.net>, "Marcia Hughes" > <hughesdrywall @aol.com>, "Kathy Garlando" <kgarlando@yahoo.com>, "Bud > Kanak" <Gulfers@msn.com>, "Doug and Nancy McFarland" > <mcf445 @bluegrass.net>, %ily Sillas" <sur`3 @embargmail.com>, "Jay & > Valerie Thompson" <jthompson @bsu.edu>, "Bill & Carolyn Carter" > <carjuselco@aol.com >, "Sue Russell" <SFR14534@aol.com>, "Karen Bubenzer" > <BKBUBENZER @SPRINTMAIL.COM>, "Jim Snyder" > <jim.fsnyder@gmail.com>, "John Carney" <bosox501 @aol.com>, "Susan > Calkins- Ritas" <calkritas @aol.com>, "Russ Brekoben" > <russamgolfer @aol.com>, "Peg Kuechle Kuechle" > <mbkuechle@sbcglobal.net >, "Robert McColl" <rwmccoll @hotmail.com>, > "Farri & M.R. Lankerani" <mlankerani @hotmail.com>, "Rollin Rhea" > <rollinrhea @yahoo.com>, "Barb & Hal Linnerud" <haroldl2 @verizon.net >, > "Laura Combs" <lrcombs @yahoo.com>, "Fred & Penny Copps" > <fccopps @charter.net>, "Ron & Barb Miner" <Baronminer@aol.com>, "Terry > Aikin" <taikin @auto- jet.com>, "Ron Stok" <darcfromfl @yahoo.com>, > "Dulcie Coleman" <d.v.coleman @imperial.ac.uk>, "Michael Seef" > <MDSLogistics @aol.com>, "Barbara Sylvester" <bjsylvester @gmailcom>, > "Gigi Benser" <ggbenser@comcast.net>, "Bruce Burkhard" <bjburkhard @comcast.net> > Cc: "Nicole Ryan Johnson" <nicolej @conservancy.org>, "Kathy Worley" > <KathyW@conservancy.org>, "Mark Muller" <Mark@MullerLawNaples.com> > Date: Thursday, February 2, 2012 7:58:58 AM GMT -5 Subject: Dunes Docks > Hi Everyone: > Please write a -mails to the Collier County Planning Commissioners and > mark on your calendar the CCPC meeting on February 16th at > 9:00 AM. It is crucial that we let the CCPC know how we feel about > this project. Please, please, please plan to attend that meeting. > The e- mail addresses for the commissioners and directions to the CCPC > meeting are below: > Philip E. Brougham <PhilBrougham@colliergov.net> > Karen Homiak <KarenHomiak@colliergov.net> > Brad Schiffer <BradSchiffer @colliergov.net> , William H. Vonier > < BillVonBradSchiffer @colliergov.netier @colliergov.net> > Barry M. Klein <bmk @bmkre.com> > Diane D. Ebert <jodiebert @comcast.net> > Melissa G. Ahern <melissaahern @colliergov.net> > Paul Midney <pmidney @collier.org> > Mark P. Strain (Chair) <MarkStrain @colliergov.net> > Thomas Eastman <EastmaTh @collier.kl2.fl.us> 2 > The meeting will be in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, > third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail. The > building is in the government building complex on the corner of > Airport Pulling and East Tamiami Trail. Plan to leave a bit early to > allow time for parking and locating the building. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 3 GundlachNancy From: BellowsRay Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 4:02 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 Attachments: oledata.mso; Look ahead CCPC Meeting.docx FYI From: BellowsRay Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 11:14 AM To: BroughamPhil Cc: GundlachNancy; BrownAraqueSummer; LorenzWilliam Subject: RE: Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 Hi Phil, This petition was recently added to the 2/16/12 CCPC meeting agenda as a companion item to the boat dock extension for the Dunes project. I have attached a revised copy of projected CCPC hearing dates for your review. If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to ask. R" Raymond V. Bellows, Planning Manager Zoning Services Section Department of Land Development Services Growth Management Division — Planning & Regulation Tele: 239.252.2463; Fax: 239.252.6350 Co er CcaKnty From: BroughamPhil Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 4:19 PM To: BellowsRay Subject: FW: Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 Ray I don't see this on the projected hearings sheet dated 1/19/12. Has it been withdrawn or continued to a later date? Phil From: Susan Snyder [ssnyderl02 @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2012 4:05 PM To: BroughamPhil Subject: Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 January 28, 2012 Dear Commissioner Brougham, I received a letter today indicating that there is a CCPC public hearing planned on February 16, 2012 to discuss Petition Number PDI- PL2012 -159 which involves a request for an insubstantial change determination to the Dunes Planned Unit Development Master Plan for the purpose of removing the Conservation Easement designation in the waterway and depicting the area for construction of a 49- wet slip boat dock facility. I wrote to you several weeks ago with my opinion about why I feel that this is not an insubstantial change and why a dock extension should not be allowed. In this e-mail, I'd like to show you with three attachments that the Conservation Easement that is being discussed has been promised many times to the state of Florida and Collier County for variances, an Environmental Resource Permit, and a submerged Land Lease. It was only after this Conservation Easement was promised, that these variances, permits, etc have been granted. How can it be construed as an insignificant change in the PUD to take back a promised Conservation Easement. That certainly isn't in the best interest of Collier County residents and visitors and would set a very poor precedent for other developers promising Conservation Easements and then reneging on the promise after they get what they want from the county and state. I hope you will consider my comments in your decision. Sincerely, Susan Leach Snyder 17 Bluebill Ave. Naples, 34108 I Map 2 yr� d'- �r > •+. 44 t r •.y .� . v :^�_• LKMA f /rte f.•.. " " ". t y- N I�l.lJ1•llll: �. i.'. 1111 .T l.'. 7 AHL-A IUBtQUIIE;L0UMtU 10IMI BOARD OF TRUSTEES -54.30 ACRES INDICATES OMITS OF PROPOSED 1" PROPRIETARY CONSERVATION EASEMENT ;l ,.1 Map 4 A f s� .r r f r;� j) b f" r is 3J..3 ,.rsT k� � C �3 �` 11 w Ark T Ng `i13 1 _ t x 1. 0 PERMJMOVVVW BOARMALXVASNE GMUNDMWELTO MwRtZE amvcm TtirrF41 Hall k Acwlsitps Ire I -- - — — - - - - — — 7 GundlachNancy From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 2:09 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Dunes Proposed Marina Item #BDE- PL2010 -979 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged More for your distribution Mark From: Nancy Mcfarland [mcf445 @bluegrass.net] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:07 PM To: PhilBrog ham (d)coliiergov.net; HomiakKaren; SchifferBrad; Vonier Bill; bmk@bmkre.com; jodiebert@ comcast.net; AhernMelissa; pmidney@collier.ora; StrainMark; FastmaThcacollIer.1<12.fLus Subject: Dunes Proposed Marina Item #BDE- PL2010 -979 Dear Commissioners: cannot believe that I am writing again concerning this proposed project:. I have written so many times stating why this marina should not be allowed. I know that you know all of the previous reasons, so I will be brief. The channel is too narrow to have a large marina for safety reasons, navigational reasons (other boats passing through the channel), recreational reasons (the use of the area by kayaks, canoes, etc.). This is a hazard for all wildlife, including manatees. It will be a noise issue for all of the condos, that are close by. But now the most important reason why this should be allowed. The Signature Group has changed their request from taking 25% of the narrow channel to 50 %! This greatly increases the reasons for not permitting the project. This is a substantial change to the original concept. This must not be permitted! We originally purchased our home here because of the untouched waterway and mangrove preserve. Now we are looking at the large Dunes complex. IPlease do not destroy the waterway also. Thank you for your consideration. Mr. and Mrs. R. Douglas McFarland 21 Blue Bill Avenue 1003 and 303 Naples, FL 34108 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a Public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 GundlachNancy prom: StrainMark Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 8:53 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Dunes master plan for your distribution. I have been sending some to Kay as I thought she was the Planner on this, but this email says you are. thanks, Mark From: baronminerpaol.com [baronminer @aol.com] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:27 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Dunes master plan Dear Mr. Strain I have received several letters from Ms. Gundlach, your Principal Planner, regarding the Dunes request for more dock space and "insubstantial" changes to their master plan. Perhaps there is some rational reason to call the change insubstantial, but the consequence of the "insubstantial" change is clearly "huge" (in the words of one of the most awful TV ads we endure). The petition number is PDI- PL2012 -159 and involves removing the conservation easement that the Dunes has promised to retain in every one of their previous applications. How can they be allowed to promise that easement throughout the entire application process and then renege at this late step. A change that fundamental should require that they start over from scratch in their efforts to destroy yet another pristine area of mangroves in order to satisfy the greed of the developers and the ego of 49 yacht owners. Please reject their request. Please also reject their request for a 1300% extension for the huge dock in our small waterway! Yours truly, Ronald E. Miner, 11 Bluebill Ave. #801, Naples, FL, 34108. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 MARK H. MULLER, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW January 27, 2012 VIA FIRST CLASS U.S. MAIL AND ELECTRONIC MAIL Mr. Ray Bellows Collier County 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Re: The Dunes Boat Docks BDE- PL2010 -979 11495 Vanderbilt Drive, Naples, FL Dear Mr. Bellows: 5150 TAMiAmi TRAIL N., SuiTE 303 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 TEL 239 - 774 -1432 FAx 239 - 774 -3426 W W W.MULLERLAwNAPLES.COM This firm represents the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association, Inc. with respect to the Boat Dock Extension Application (the "Application") filed by Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. on behalf of an affiliate of Signature Communities, Inc., the developer of The Dunes condominium project (the "Project "). We believe that the Application must be denied because Ordinance No. 2000 -74 (the "Amended PUD ") which governs the Project does not allow for the construction of any boat docks in the manmade waterway shown on the Amended Master Plan, and thus the Boat Dock Extension application is premature. The Amended PUD must be amended by the Board of County Commissioners to affirmatively allow boat docks in the manmade waterway before the Application can be addressed by the Collier County Planning Commission. For ease of reference we have enclosed a copy of the Amended PUD as well as a copy of Ordinance No. 98 -24 (the "Original PUD "). The only reference to boathouses and docks in the Amended PUD is in paragraph 3.4(B)(2). This paragraph is contained in Section III of the Amended PUD which establishes the land use regulations and development standards solely for the residential development areas shown on the Amended Master Plan. The Amended Master Plan shows three residential areas that are identified as Rl, R2 and R3. None of the three residential areas include the manmade waterway or any land contiguous to the manmade waterway. While boathouses and docks are V004.001 Mr. Ray Bellows January 27, 2012 Page 2 allowed in areas RI, R2 and R3 subject to the requirements of section 2.6.21 (now 5.03.06) of the Land Development Code, boathouses and docks are not authorized by the Amended PUD in the manmade waterway. Section V of the Amended PUD sets forth the development commitments for the entire proj ect. Paragraph 5.10(F) requires that "all conservation areas shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or easements dedicated to an approved entity or to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance and subject to the uses and limitations similar to or as per Section 640.06. [sic] of the Florida Statutes." The "Legend" in the Amended Master Plan clearly shows that the manmade waterway is a conservation area and is required to be subjected to the "conservation easement" described in paragraph 5.10(F) of the Amended PUD. Section 704.061, Florida Statutes, defines and governs conservation easements. Section 704.06(1), Florida Statutes, states that: As used in this section, "conservation easement" means a right or interest in real property which is appropriate to retaining land or water areas predominantly in their natural, scenic, open, agricultural, or wooded condition; retaining such areas as suitable habitat for fish, plants, or wildlife; retaining the structural integrity or physical appearance of sites or properties of historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural significance; or maintaining existing land uses and which prohibits or limits any or all of the following: (a) Construction or placing of buildings, roads, signs, billboards or other advertising, utilities, or other structures on or above the ground. (d) Excavation, dredging, or removal of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock, or other material substance in such manner as to affect the surface. (Emphasis supplied.) The manmade waterway must be dedicated to Collier County with a conservation easement which retains "water areas predominantly in their natural ... open ... condition," retains such areas "as suitable habitat for fish, plants or wildlife," maintains "existing land uses," and prohibits or limits "construction ... of ... structures on or above the ground." The construction of a 1,540 foot dock with 49 boat slips protruding a maximum of 280 feet into the 1 The reference to section 640.06, Florida Statutes, was erroneous and should have referred to section 704.06, Florida Statutes. There is no chapter 640 or section 640.06 in the Florida Statutes. The conservation easement statute is section 704.06. The identical sections of the Original PUD correctly referred to section 704.06, Florida Statutes. V004.001 i i I. i Mr. Ray Bellows January 27, 2012 Page 3 manmade waterway from the mean high water line is completely incompatible with a conservation easement. Twelve years after the Amended PUD was adopted, the developer has still not dedicated the preserve area and the manmade waterway to a conservation easement. In fact, the Application includes a proposed conservation easement which dedicates only the preserve area and completely omits the manmade waterway. We will not speculate in this letter on the motives behind the omission of the manmade waterway from the conservation easement. To further support our position that the Amended PUD does not authorize the construction of any docks in the manmade waterway, we point out that the Original PUD is dramatically different from the Amended PUD with respect to boathouses and docks in at least three ways. First, the Original Master Plan showed only two land use designations: residential and preserve. Unlike the Amended Master Plan, the manmade waterway and Water Turkey Bay did not have a land use designation and were not dedicated to a conservation easement. Second, the Original Master Plan showed a "Marginal Wharf' contiguous to the preserve area which extended from Water Turkey Bay to close to Bluebill Avenue in approximately the same length and location as the docks are proposed to be in the Application. The Amended Master Plan does not show the Marginal Wharf or any docks. Finally, Section IV of the Original PUD, which established the land use regulations and development standards for the preserve area, specifically referenced the "Marginal Wharf' in paragraph 4.4(I) and stated that "The Marginal Wharf shall be in compliance with the Manatee Protection Plan at the time of final development order approval." Paragraph 4.4(I) was deleted from the Amended PUD and no language authorizing a Marginal Wharf or any docks was added elsewhere in the Amended PUD. Prior to 2000, the Marginal Wharf was allowed to be constructed at the project because it was shown on the Original Master Plan and it was authorized by paragraph 4.4(I). Section 3.4(B)(2) of the Original PUD and the Amended PUD are the same. Section 3.4(B)(2) authorizes boathouses and docks to be constructed only in the residential areas of the project and does not authorize their construction in the preserve area or the manmade waterway. The developer's reliance on section 3.4(B)(2) of the Amended PUD to gain approval to construct docks in the manmade waterway (i.e. not in the residential district) is clearly wrong. The plain and unambiguous language of the Amended PUD does not allow any docks to be constructed in the manmade waterway and, in fact, the manmade waterway is required to be dedicated to a conservation easement which would prohibit the construction of over a quarter mile of docks. V004.001 Mr. Ray Bellows January 27, 2012 Page 4 While we are confident that you will agree that the plain and unambiguous language of the Amended PUD does not authorize the Collier County Planning Commission to approve the Application, the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association will take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that all parties comply with the Amended PUD. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this matter or would like to discuss anything with me. Sincerely, MARK ;j. MULLER, P.A. Z' Mark H. Muller cc: Susan Snyder V004.001 GundlachNancy From: nicole johnson [nicolej @conservancy.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2011 5:07 PM To: GundlachNancy; BellowsRay; BrownAraqueSummer Cc: CasalanguidaNick; LorenzWilliam Subject: Dunes Boat Docks CONSERVANCY of Soutimost Floficla QUM WATEM, LANG, WILE)LIQ, fib' URL December 20, 2011 RE: Dunes Boat Docks The Conservancy of Southwest Florida has reviewed the Land Development Code (LDC) provisions for activities that would constitute a substantial versus insubstantial change to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), as applicable to the proposed boat docks at The Dunes. Our assessment of the PUD language, the PUD Master Plan and the definition of what constitutes a substantial change per the LDC leads us to conclude that the addition of boat docks to The Dunes should constitute a substantial change, requiring a PUD amendment and a full public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Our determination is based upon the following factors: 1. According to LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1.i., a substantial change to a PUD includes, Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the future land use element or other element of the growth management plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land use. The current PUD for The Dunes, as contained in Ordinance 2000 -74 and approved by the BCC on November 14, 2000, does not specifically address the future intensity of boat docks within the project. The only reference to boat docks within this PUD is contained in Section III "Residential Development Areas" and states under 3.4.6.2. that Accessory Uses include, "Boathouses and docks, subject to Sec.2.6.21. of the Collier County Land Development Code." Thus, while boat docks were envisioned as a potential future use, a specific number of docks was not thoroughly assessed during the PUD approval. This is further reflected in Exhibit A, the PUD Master Plan, which shows only a boardwalk to a gazebo in Water Turkey Bay. Thus, at the PUD amendment hearing in 2000, the concept of future boat docks was so conceptual that no number or location was included. As no level of intensity was determined for boat docks at the PUD amendment hearing in 2000, the Conservancy believes that the applicant's desire to now establish a number of boat docks would be considered an increase in intensity. How can it be argued that 49 wet slips is not an increase in intensity when only the generic term "docks" was included in the 2000 PUD? No baseline for intensity has been established. The Conservancy has reviewed the records and we understand that the applicant did, at some point during the PUD hearing, mention that they would not exceed 60 slips. However, this was not a number meaningfully vetted by the public, stakeholders or the BCC. Furthermore, as the number of 60 wet slips was not included in the PUD, merely stating something on the public record is not a valid means of establishing baseline intensity for future docks within this project — only the PUD can do that. The public deserves the opportunity for a BCC hearing to share comments and concerns regarding the number of boat docks proposed by The Dunes. As the number of docks and their location were not considered during the 2000 PUD hearing, the applicant would essentially be circumventing the public process by securing these wet slips through an insubstantial change as a PUDI. While the PUDI does go to the Planning Commission, something as potentially impacting as a new dock facility deserves to be vetted through the BCC as a full PUD amendment. 2. The Dunes PUD allows boat docks as an accessory use within the "Residential Development Areas ". However, the boat docks are not being proposed for the residential areas, but are instead proposed to be located on State submerged lands adjacent to the project's Preserve. In addition, the PUD Master Plan incorrectly labels this same waterway as a "conservation easement" area. The Conservancy believes that a PUD amendment is needed to clarify the conservation easement status of the Vanderbilt Channel and Water Turkey Bay, in addition to rectifying the fact that the proposed boat docks are not contained within the residential portion of the project. This would constitute a language change to the PUD, which is considered to be a substantial change requiring a PUD amendment, per LDC Section 10.02.13.E.5., which states, Language changes to be previously approved PUD document shall require the same procedure as for amending the official zoning atlas. In addition, a conservation easement is required as part of PUD Section 4.5. This easement is in addition to other conservation easements required by permitting agencies. This PUD is now over a decade old and the project is close to built -out, if not already at build -out. Yet, no County conservation easement has been recorded. The Conservancy believes that this easement, as required by the PUD, should be recorded prior to any additional consideration for changes to The Dunes, including the approval of boat docks. 3. The number of boat docks allowed should be specifically incorporated into the PUD, in addition to the location of these boat docks being depicted on the PUD Master Plan. There have been few PUDs with boat docks approved in recent years, but one example should be highlighted for comparison. The Coconilla PUD was approved in 2005 by Ordinance 2005 -15. This is a residential project with a marina for the private use of its members — similar to what The Dunes is requesting. The difference is that Coconilla was forthcoming in their desire to have boat docks as part of their project and included this in the PUD application. They were approved for up to 29 slips, and the marina design was included in the PUD Master Plan. The appropriateness of the number and location of Coconilla's docks was the center of debate at the BCC, but because these docks were discussed during the full PUD hearing, all stakeholders were allowed to provide input. The result was a marina configuration and a set number of wet slips that, whether or not a stakeholder liked the outcome, was subject to full review, scrutiny and BCC approval. Increasing the number of wet slips at Coconilla would require a PUD amendment, changing the language in the Land Use Summary Table 1, which specifies there will be up to 29 wet slips. A PUD amendment would be required because the language in the PUD land use table would need to be modified and, in addition, the action would be considered an increase in intensity. However, to determine if an increase in intensification is occurring, there has to be a baseline number by which to compare. The County would be applying an unfair standard to require Coconilla to amend their PUD to increase their number of wet slips, but allow The Dunes, which has never established any specific number of wet slips, to have 49 through an insubstantial change and PUDI. 4. LDC Section 10.02.13.E.1.e. states that a substantial change occurs if, There is a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities. The Conservancy believes that the placement of a linear dock along the relatively narrow channel of the Vanderbilt Channel may constitute a substantial increase in impacts to a public facility, namely a waterway heavily utilized by our boating community. Navigational safety is not the Conservancy's area of expertise, but adjacent residents and local boaters have expressed concern on this matter. They deserve the benefit of presenting their information on this topic before a decision can be made with regard to this policy. Based upon these considerations, the Conservancy believes that the proposed 49 boat docks requested for The Dunes should be considered a substantial change and be subject to a PUD amendment and hearing before the BCC. Thank you for considering the Conservancy's comments as you make your determination on this issue, and please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Nicole Nicole Johnson Director of GovernmentaCizeCations Conservancy of Southwest FCorida 1450 _%terrihue Drive, NapCes FL 34102 239- 403 -4220 www.conservancy.org Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. 4 5/25/10 RECEIVED MAY 2 8 2010 ZONING DEPARTMENT To: Mr Ray Bellows Zoning Manager, Comprehensive Development & Environmental Services Collier County Government 2800 N Horseshoe Dr. Naples, Fla 34104 Dear Mr Bellows, Re : Dunes of North Naples - Cayman Bldg We are the Board of Directors of the Cayman Bldg (Bldg #3) within the Dunes master community. Our facility and property was turned over to our 84 owners in 2004 from our Developer ( Signature Properties ) and we now operate as our own Condo Assn. The reason for our letter to you is to record our objections to selected aspects of our Developer's future , proposed marina plan. Previously, our Board of Directors was made aware of a Master Plan drawing revision # 16 in April 2010 submitted to the Collier County Growth Mgmt Divis ion. Our original correspondence on this was sent to Ms Willoughby on 5/19/10. She has since responded that the drawing has been changed yet again. Regardless of the revision number and / or when the Developer's final plan will be submitted for final approval, we feel it necessary to voice our objections as they relate to the safety and well being of our 84 owners. The Dunes Developer has a specific intent to put a marina on the Dunes site. If such a marina will exist, then there will inherently have to be access from the marina site on the water to connect with the owners within the Dunes community. The physical location of this access between the marina and the 8 Buildings within the master community is the basis of our objections. Heretofore, any drawings we have seen that outlines the location and accessibility of the proposed marina offers a boardwalk and paver path, and runs from the water along a line between Bldgs 3 & 4. However, the only entrance and exit of this boardwalk and paver path, dumps both into and onto the property lines and parking lot of Bldg 3 (Cayman).. Overall; we are not opposed to the Developer establishing a marina on Dunes property. We.are, however, opposed to locating the boardwalk and. paver path directly on our property when there are other solutions. Our objections are based on the following issues that we feel would adversely affect both the safety and well being of our 84 owners and their families and guests : 1) The proposed boardwalk and paver path is planned to be built substantially on the private property of Cayman. There, however, is clearly more than ample and sufficient space to continue the boardwalk on a similar course / direction apart from our private property and on a similar path with the "common" property of the preserve. The preserve area is where the boardwalk is planned. It should stay within the preserve area entirely. 2) Our 84 - resident Cayman Bldg has 84 parking spaces inside our building and an almost equal number located outside and all within our property's boundaries. The planned boardwalk, if allowed to be built on the private property of Cayman, will have its only entry and exit points directly into our parking lot. This reduction of already - limited parking spots will be a hardship on our owners and guests by no longer offering an adequate number of parking spots. Our only option would be to then seek the usage of parking on the private property of yet another privately owned Dunes building. It is our feeling that our residents should not be penalized with too limited parking because the Developer decided to encroach onto our property without any input on the consequences our owners would be faced with. 3) Our building has 2 garage -door entrances. The planned boardwalk, with its planned entry / exit into our most eastern parking lot, will become a potential traffic hazard as fully one half of all our owners come and go from our eastern garage entrance - - - -- which is almost directly in front of the boardwalk entrance / exit. With the planned boardwalk, there may be extensive foot or vehicle traffic emanating from the 634 owners within the entire community going to and from the boardwalk. Accordingly, our owners who are entering or exiting our own garage, as well as the numerous deliveries being made thru the garage by contractors, will now be at risk of being responsible for yielding to all this new foot and vehicular traffic coming to access the boardwalk. This scenario of potentially 634 Dunes residents coming onto our Dunes Cayman property to park, to walk, to gain access to the boardwalk seems to suggest that there may be serious and unnecessary chance of risk of injury, congestion, and lack of safe access to our own residences. In summary we understand the Developer's desire to install a boardwalk for everyone to be able to gain access to the planned marina. However, we feel that if the boardwalk is built actually "on" our Cayman private property as planned, it will inherently create an unsafe and unnecessary hardship on the 84 owners of Dunes Cayman building. It is our suggestion to position the boardwalk entirely within the preserve area and offer its entrance and exit onto the common property owned by the entire master community, where there is common parking,no obstruction of any existing garage traffic flow, no loss of existing limited parking spaces, and no negative impact on any one group of residents. We respectfully request that your office, the Collier County Comprehensive Development & Environmental Services Division consider our objections as stated within, and redirect the positioning of any planned boardwalk to where it is parallel to, but not on or into, the private property of Dunes Cayman. We further request that you please forward this letter of objections to any other Collier County activity that might be involved in approving any marina / boardwalk plan to be submitted by the Dunes Developer at any time in the future. Given the numerous times the Developer's site plan has been submitted for revision, coupled with the high probability that it will need further revisions to additionally accommodate the planned marina / boardwalk, we fear that we will be unable to be made aware of all of these future revisions. But if the marina / boardwalk plan is submitted to Collier County by the Dunes Developer for approval, we ask for Collier County government be mindful of our objections and do everything it can to negotiate the satisfactory conclusion we have proposed. Thank you in advance for your consideration and understanding. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call. Bill Schaefer - President, Dunes III Cayman Condo Association (bill schaefer301 @.Pmail.com ; 248 -515 -0312 CC -- Ms Christine Willoughby ( Growth Mgmt Division - Collier County) Gun4lachNancy From: CasalanguidaNick Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 20119:28 AM To: LorenzWilliam; GundlachNancy; BellowsRay Subject: FW: The Dunes Boat Dock Extension Petition Importance: High Please review and discuss with me staff position and conflict points From: Bruce Burkhard [ mailto:biburkhard(acomcast.net1 Sent: Monday, December 19, 20115:31 PM To: CasalanguidaNick Cc: Snyder Susan; Muller Mark Subject: Re: The Dunes Boat Dock Extension Petition Nick, Thanks for the heads up. I think we need to meet and I think Leo should also be included. You should know that we have retained Mark Muller, Esq. to help us with this case. There have been so many twists and turns right from the start of the PUD process with numerous oversights and a far less than transparent process. Now that we are at the 11th hour, the floating of an "insubstantial change" idea to smooth this bad project through is unacceptable in my opinion. That idea was tried once before in the case of the LaPlaya docks and even Jim Mudd stated that something didn't smell right. In that case the County dropped the idea and I certainly hope is is quickly quashed again. Right now as I see it there is no real process for real, significant public input. Starting at the first EAC meeting there was a contemplation and in fact a stipulation that a conditional use hearing would be required even for the passive wharf with no overnight mooring allowed. Somehow that was left out of subsequent documents forwarded to the CCPC and the BCC. They, in other words made decisions and recommendations based on incomplete facts. Promises have been made about perpetual conservation easements which left the impression that the mangrove forests would be protected in a preserve —the impression being that there would be no use of the land and therefore no access to the water on the other side. I don't want to make this a definitive statement of our position and arguments. I only want you to know that we feel there are substantial problems with this project and it is in no way ready to be presented to the CCPC. I'll try to give you a call tomorrow to see about a convenient meeting time. I know that the holidays are closing in and if we don't meet soon we won't have a chance until everyone is back after the first of the year. Thanks, Bruce From: CasalanguidaNick Sent: Monday, December 19, 20114:33 PM To: Bruce & Susan Burkhard Cc: CasalanguidaNick Subject: FW: The Dunes Boat Dock Extension Petition Mr. Burkhard, FYI as a courtesy, I have not reviewed it yet. Nick It has been bought to our attention that in order to move forward with the boat dock petition, a PUDI (Insubstantial Change to the PUD) Master Plan for The Dunes must be made. Specifically the request is that the following revisions are made: 1. Remove the Conservation Easement from the area where the boat docks are located. 2. Depict the boat dock location on the PUD Master Plan. 3. Add the following note to the PUD Master Plan, `Boat Docks are an Accessory Use to Residential." In addition, it is recommended that the Conservation Easement is recorded prior to the BDE. I am also told that this issue was previously discussed in 2009 with Karen Bishop, Joe Schmitt and Susan Mason. The January 5, 2012 CCPC date for the boat dock extension has been cancelled. In order to save time, the BDE and the PUDI may be heard by the CCPC as companion items. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Nancy Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA Principal Planner (239)252 -2484 Under Florida Law, e -mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send F�J electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. GundlachNanc From: BellowsRay Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 8:21 AM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Dunes Boat Dock Extension Please forward to the CCPC members - - - -- Original Message---- - From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 7:58 AM To: BellowsRay Subject: FW: Dunes Boat Dock Extension for distribution. Mark From: Olya Popowych [opopowych @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 3:42 PM Subject: Dunes Boat Dock Extension Dear Commissioner: This e -mail is in reference to BDE- PL2010 -979, Dunes Boat Dock Extension at 11494 Vanderbilt Drive. I understand that in the near future, you will be making several decisions involving the Dunes Dock Marina. This letter is to explain the opinion of the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association (over 1000 paid members) in regards to the issues that will be discussed. One of your decisions is to consider allowing Vanderbilt Partners II LTD (aka Signature Developers) to make an insubstantial change in their PUD from a "passive wharf with no overnight parking" to a "49- wet slip marina with a fishing pier." County staff's recommendation to you that this is an insubstantial change is illogical. If this isn't a substantial change, then what is considered to be substantial to the staff. I hope that you will decide against their recommendation. In addition, you will be deciding on two separate issues that concern dock extensions. One involves the length of the docks and the other, the number of wet slips that can be built. In regard to the length of the docks, Signature wants to extend the marina facility well beyond the County 20 -foot dock length limit to 48 -76 feet, depending on specific location. In fact, they want to extend the marina out so that it will block almost 50% of the channel. This is wrong for so many reasons, some of which I've discussed below: 1) Traversing this narrow channel is the only way hundreds of boats can exit to Wiggins Pass and the Gulf of Mexico. Navigation will be unsafe as boats 30 to 35 feet long back from the marina into the constricted channel, while at the same time boats are exiting and entering the Baker Carroll Marina and Vanderbilt Lagoon. (Please see the 2 attached satellite views) 2) The channel is not as wide as it appears because riprap has been placed along some of the seawall on the west bank of the channel. 3) At a CCBC meeting a few years ago, in order to get permits to build 16 docks in its recessed marina on the west bank of the Vanderbilt Channel directly across from the proposed Dunes Marina, the Baker Carroll Marina Board had to promise it would never request dock permits to build into the channel. Is it fair that Signature be permitted to build into and block so much of the waterway when the community on the west bank of the river was restricted from building any docks in the channel? 4) Dredging will adversely affect the west bank property seawall integrity and create costly repairs for the property owners. Also, the seawall will receive more water surge damage with boats backing into the channel from the Dunes Marina and from passing boats having to hug the seawall to get through the constricted channel. The Baker Carroll recessed boat harbor with seawall and docks will be affected too. Does Signature plan to reinforce neighbors' seawalls with riprap to prevent damage caused by their marina? If the docks are extended, will west bank property owners be restricted from placing additional riprap into the channel to protect their seawalls because riprap would further constrict the channel? 5) A marina extending 48 -76 feet into the channel will have a major impact on the neighbors' views. Those living on the lower floors of condos on the west bank of the channel and boaters who are passing through the channel will have an obstructed view of the mangroves and bird rookery. Those living in some Dunes condos with have an obstructed view of the water. Some Dunes residents are very much opposed to the docks. 6) In the past, Signature has clearly stated in all applications to the 1) South Florida Water Management District, 2) the Army Corps of Engineers (please see attached letter as reference), and 3) Governor Crist and his Cabinet, sitting as the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund that oversees Outstanding Florida Water that the Dunes Marina would block less than 25% of the channel width. Shouldn't Signature be held to their original permitted 25%? If not, shouldn't they be required to go back to all of these government agencies and reapply for all permits prior to applying to the Collier County Planning Commission for a dock extension? In regard to the developer asking for permits to build 49 wetslips. Unless its Conservation Easement is counted in the shoreline calculation, the number of docks that can be permitted is 28. Signature has already used the same Conservation Easement three times. Once was as mitigation for scrub habitat destruction when the condos were build, the second time was to get an Environmental Resource Permit from the South Florida Water Management District, the third time was to get a Submerged Land Lease from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund. Not only does using the same Conservation Easement many times seem unconcible, it seems to totally defeat the purpose of a Conservation Easement. And, this easement is adjacent to the proposed location of the marina. Any disruption (dredging, oil leaks, etc..) will adversely affect the easement. One more argument against such an overdevelopment of 49 docks is that this marina will be located in a channel that has been identified as Outstanding Florida Water and is suppose to be receiving extra protection. Who is protecting it? Thank you very much for your time in reading this very lengthy letter, and for considering the effects this marina will have on the Vanderbilt Beach Community. Sincerely, Olya Popowych Vanderbilt Gulfside Resident 2 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 3 GundlachNancy AOftk From: BellowsRay Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 8:23 AM To: GundlachNancy Cc: LorenzWilliam Subject: FW: Dunes Boat Dock Extension Attachments: AerialShot3.jpg; AerialShotProposedDunesDocks .jpg; Page1.jpg; Page2.jpg FYI - - - -- Original Message---- - From: StrainMark Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 7:54 AM To: BellowsRay Subject: FW: Dunes Boat Dock Extension I am not sure who is handling this as we have not seen it yet, but I will forwarded any comments I receive to you for dissemination. Mark From: Susan Snyder [ssnyder102 @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 11:13 AM To: StrainMark Subject: Dunes Boat Dock Extension Dear Commissioner Strain, This e -mail is in reference to BDE- PL2010 -979, Dunes Boat Dock Extension at 11494 Vanderbilt Drive. I understand that in the near future, you will be making several decisions involving the Dunes Dock Marina. This letter is to explain the opinion of the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association (over 1000 paid members) in regards to the issues that will be discussed. One of your decisions is to consider allowing Vanderbilt Partners II LTD (aka Signature Developers) to make an insubstantial change in their PUD from a "passive wharf with no overnight parking" to a "49- wet slip marina with a fishing pier." County staff's recommendation to you that this is an insubstantial change is illogical. If this isn't a substantial change, then what is considered to be substantial to the staff. I hope that you will decide against their recommendation. In addition, you will be deciding on two separate issues that concern dock extensions. One involves the length of the docks and the other, the number of wet slips that can be built. In regard to the length of the docks, Signature wants to extend the marina facility well beyond the County 20 -foot dock length limit to 48 -76 feet, depending on specific location. In fact, they want to extend the marina out so that it will block almost 50% of the channel. This is wrong for so many reasons, some of which I've discussed below: 1) Traversing this narrow channel is the only way hundreds of boats can exit to Wiggins Pass and the Gulf of Mexico. Navigation will be unsafe as boats 30 to 35 feet long back from the marina into the constricted channel, while at the same time boats are exiting and entering the Baker Carroll Marina and Vanderbilt Lagoon. (Please see the 2 attached satellite views) 2) The channel is not as wide as it appears because riprap has been placed along some of the seawall on the west bank of the channel. 3) At a CCBC meeting a few years ago, in order to get permits to build 16 docks in its recessed marina on the west bank of the Vanderbilt Channel directly across from the proposed Dunes Marina, the Baker Carroll Marina Board had to promise it would never request dock permits to builld into the channel. Is it fair that Signature be permitted to build into and block so much of the waterway when the community on the west bank of the river was restricted from building any docks in the channel? 4) Dredging will adversely affect the west bank property seawall integrity and create costly repairs for the property owners. Also, the seawall will receive more water surge damage with boats backing into the channel from the Dunes Marina and from passing boats having to hug the seawall to get through the constricted channel. The Baker Carroll recessed boat harbor with seawall and docks will be affected too. Does Signature plan to reinforce neighbors' seawalls with riprap to prevent damage caused by their marina? If the docks are extended, will west bank property owners be restricted from placing additional riprap into the channel to protect their seawalls because riprap would further constrict the channel? 5) A marina extending 48 -76 feet into the channel will have a major impact on the neighbors' views. Those living on the lower floors of condos on the west bank of the channel and boaters who are passing through the channel will have an obstructed view of the mangroves and bird rookery. Those living in some Dunes condos with have an obstructed view of the water. Some Dunes residents are very much opposed to the docks. 6) In the past, Signature has clearly stated in all applications to the 1) South Florida Water Management District, 2) the Army Corps of Engineers (please see attached letter as reference), and 3) Governor Crist and his Cabinet, sitting as the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund that oversees Outstanding Florida Water that the Dunes Marina would block less than 25% of the channel width. Shouldn't Signature be held to their original permitted 25 %? If not, shouldn't they be required to go back to all of these government agencies and reapply for all permits prior to applying to the Collier County Planning Commission for a dock extension? In regard to the developer asking for permits to build 49 wetslips. Unless its Conservation Easement is counted in the shoreline calculation, the number of docks that can be permitted is 28. Signature has already used the same Conservation Easement three times. Once was as mitigation for scrub habitat destruction when the condos were build, the second time was to get an Environmental Resource Permit from the South Florida Water Management District, the third time was to get a Submerged Land Lease from the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund. Not only does using the same Conservation Easement many times seem unconcible, it seems to totally defeat the purpose of a Conservation Easement. And, this easement is adjacent to the proposed location of the marina. Any disruption (dredging, oil leaks, etc..) will adversely affect the easement. One more argument against such an overdevelopment of 49 docks is that this marina will be located in a channel that has been identified as Outstanding Florida Water and is suppose to be receiving extra protection. Who is protecting it? Thank you very much for your time in reading this very lengthy letter, and for considering the effects this marina will have on the Vanderbilt Beach Community. Sincerely, Susan Snyder z Board Member of the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association [ cid: 0B171345- 59B3- 49CD- A1F1- 69BE9A5FEB67 @local] [cid:30369F7F- 1BOC -47B9- 9194- D3EB73D74BC6 @local] [ cid: DF4873CE- 3F37- 49AE- 9EOD- B2BAFE66E8A6 @local] [ cid: 64F79252- 12B6- 43A0- 9F1A- FB83BE9FE5BD@local] Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released.in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 3 *'.IV. N t 16 01! r - - =- TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. MARINE & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 3584 Exchange Avenue, Suite B • Naples, Florida 34104 -3732 • (239) 643 -0166 • Fax (239) 643 -6632 January 27, 2012 Nancy Gundlach Principal Planner Collier County Government Department of Zoning & Land Development Review 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: BDE- PL2010 -979 Dunes Docks BDE Nancy, We are in receipt of four letters of objection from various people relative to the above BDE application. This letter is our response to the comments and issues raised in those letters. I have tried to group our responses in the same manner as the comments were presented in the letters. The letters from Susan Snyder and Olya Popowych were identical so I have grouped them together for this response. Both letters make a blanket statement that the proposed docks will block almost 50% of the channel. This is a false statement. The identified marked channel that runs from the Bluebill Bridge through Water Turkey Bay and out towards Wiggins Pass varies from 60 to 70 feet wide and the proposed docks do not block any portion of it. The navigable portion of the Vanderbilt Waterway in the area where the docks are proposed varies from about 190 feet to 260 feet wide. The proposed docks do extend into the waterway but in no place do they extend more than 25% the width of the navigable portion as has been shown on the State ERP permit for the project as well as the exhibits presented in support of this petition. The passage through the bridge is approximately 135 feet wide with the majority of vessels utilizing the center span which is approximately 60 feet wide. The proposed docks will block no portion of the bridge. 1. Navigation will not be unsafe in this area as a result of the proposed docks. The entire stretch of this waterway is idle speed so ample maneuvering time will be available for any vessel travelling through this area. There will be at least 160 feet of waterway width for maneuvering into and out of the proposed slips as well as the adjacent basin. The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has looked at this project with respect to potential navigational concerns and determined that there were not any. 2. There is rip -rap placed against the western seawall in places. There are also three boat slips which stick out a little further than the rip -rap. Neither of these items was any cause of concern regarding navigation through this waterway. According to the County Code, the width of the waterway runs from MHW to MHW for this property, the placement of rip rap and docks does not change the width unless they also change the location of the MHW line. That is not the case here. 3. The adjacent project did agree in their BDE hearing to not put docks in the waterway. They had an existing basin in which to locate their docks, maintain their riparian access to their property, and accommodate the vessels they wanted. There was no legal or County Code reason for them to give up this right along the waterway except for their desire to get through the BDE hearings smoothly. Putting Attachment C Page 2 of 4 the docks within the existing manmade basin met their needs at the time and was the least damaging alternative for them. The Dunes has done the same thing in their proposals. They have agreed to not place any vessel slips within Water Turkey Bay, and they have located the docks in the least environmentally damaging location available to them. The Vanderbilt waterway is a man made construct and is the appropriate location for them to place their slips. They have limited the number of slips proposed to less than 10% of their units. County and State regulations allow for 1 slip per unit and the Dunes is asking for 49 slips for 640 units, much less than what is allowed. I have to ask if it is fair for these objectors to deny the residents of the Dunes the same rights and access to the water that all of the other residents along Vanderbilt Lagoon enjoy. 4. This waterway is man made and has been dredged in the past when it was created as well as more recently for maintenance purposes. The dredging proposed now will not affect the seawall integrity along the west bank of the waterway. It is a maintenance operation to restore the depth to the elevations when it was originally created. This will provide extra assurance that water quality will be maintained and prop dredging will not occur. The dredging will not create any holes where sloughing could occur that would in any way affect the western shoreline. You can look at maintenance dredging projects done throughout the county and the city within waterways and canals that do not affect the adjacent seawalls. As stated earlier, this waterway is idle speed only so surge and wakes along the adjacent seawall will not be a detrimental factor. In fact, the mangrove shoreline preserved by the Dunes will absorb wave energy and dissipate rather than reflect it as would have been the case if they proposed seawall such as the rest of Vanderbilt lagoon has. 5. Neighbor's views will be changed. However, the expectation of an unobstructed view to the horizon is unrealistic. State law looks at views in association with riparian rights as extending out to the center of the channel, not across an entire waterway. The neighboring residents will have exactly the same view of the waterway and channel as they have now; it is the opposite shoreline which is changing. Mangroves and birds perching in the mangroves will still be present. There is not any bird rookery present around the dock locations. 6. The issue about waterway width has been addressed in previous responses. The project does not block more than 25% of the navigable waterway and is consistent with all of the relevant agency permits issued for it. The issue related to whether or not the shoreline associated with the existing conservation easements could be counted or not in the wet slip calculations has been examined and coordinated with the Easement Grantees. It is clear to both the SFWMD and the FFWCC that the shoreline can be included in the calculations. The Conservancy of Southwest Florida letter was more aimed at the PUD process and what type of review they think is necessary. Our Opinion is that no amendment to the PUD is required because of the language in it and the past discussions that were held with County staff back in 2009 when this issue first came up. More recent reviews by different County staff has resulted in the Staff opinion changing to the point that they feel an insubstantial change is needed to further clarify the Master Plan exhibit associated with the PUD. 1. The Conservancy opines that the proposed plan to install 49 slips at the Dunes represents a substantial change to the intensity of the planned land use. We disagree. When the PUD ordinance was presented to the BOCC, the number of slips was specifically discussed. The number allowed, the number proposed, and the placement of the docks was all discussed. The Board even had the property developer stand at the podium and put the commitment to do no more than 60 slips and to place them all in the waterway and not in Water Page 3 of 4 Turkey Bay into the record himself. The PUD references Section 2.6.21 of the LDC that was in place at the time of the PUD approval. This Section generally corresponds to Section 5.03.06 in today's LDC and refers to the placement, protrusion, and BDE process applicable for docking facilities. This BDE application meets that requirement and entails a public hearing so a substantial PUD amendment should not be required. The Conservancy's statement that "merely stating something on the public record is not a valid means of establishing future intensity" is inconsistent with positions taken by County staff and former Boards where applicants have been held to commitments made in public hearings. The public has the opportunity to provide their opinions at the BDE hearing in front of the Planning Commission in a public forum. The PUD only allows for the possibility of the slips, it is the BDE process which will actually allow or disallow the actual construction of them. The statement that this is a new dock is misleading, as described above, the opponents of this project have known about it for years and have voiced their opposition at every opportunity. 2. Common sense should dictate that boats docks have to be located within the water. In every other multi- family residential project we are aware of, the residential areas depicted on site and PUD plans does not cover or contain the dock area. The docks are accessory to the residential units and are located accordingly to minimize environmental impacts. The PUD Master plan may be confusing in that it labels open water and conservation easement area with the same hatch type. This confusion is what we understand County staff wants to alleviate with an amended master site plan exhibit through the PUDI process. We do not believe that any language changes are required to the PUD document. Conservation easement to the SFWMD are in place on the preserve areas and they limit what can and can not be done within the preserves. Access to the boat docks and counting of the shoreline towards the number of slips permitted are allowed in the easements. Collier County has had draft easements to review for the preserve areas but has yet to approve the language proposed. 3. As stated above, we believe that the location and number of boat docks was discussed and incorporated into the original PUD approvals. We understand staff's position that a PUDI should be processed to clarify the Master site plan and more accurately reflect the final location for the dock access and placement. We do not agree with the Conservancy's position that this should constitute a substantial change and further review by the BOCC to discuss things that were already discussed and incorporated into the original approvals. Because of that, the installation now of the docks, less than what were contemplated at the original approval is a decrease in intensity, not an increase as opined by the Conservancy. 4. The Conservancy and the other opponents to this project should be aware that this same argument about navigation was brought up during the state permitting process. The FFWCC examined the proposal in conjunction with the waterway and the traffic and did not foresee any navigation problems. They stated that "most vessel traffic in this area is from recreational residents, which are familiar to this area and adhere to the idle speed zone. Additionally, the vessel traffic which operate in this area use the center span of the Blue Bill Ave. bridge; therefore operating near the center of the channel." In the same e-mail, FFWCC stated that they did have some concerns related to water depths in Water Turkey Bay relative to the size (drafts) of vessels that could utilize the Dunes facility. Later revisions reducing the maximum size and drafts of vessels allowed to utilize the facility alleviated these concerns. Mr. Burkhard's letter was similar to the Conservancy's in regards to PUD items. He does make a statement that the impression was the mangroves would be preserved in perpetuity and no access to the water would be allowed. This has never been the case. There has always been access through the mangroves to the water shown, and as discussed above, docks have always been contemplated. It's hard to understand how he could have this misconception when Page 41of 4 he has been commenting on and reviewing this project for at least the past 3 or 4 years. The mangroves are being preserved in perpetuity and do currently have conservation easements in place on them to the SFWMD. I hope this helps to clarify our position with respect to these comments. Please don't hesitate to contact me should you have any questions related to our responses. Sincerely, Timothy Hall Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Ms. Susan Leach Snyder Vanderbilt Surf Colony Ill Association 17 Bluebill Avenue, #803 Naples, Florida. 34108 Dear Ms. Snyder: Reference is made to your correspondence received in September 2007 objecting to the proposed Dunes Docks project. The Department of the.Army permit application number is SAJ-2002- 02966(IP -LBD). The project is located! within Water Turkey Bay at the intersection of 111th Avenue North and Vanderbilt Drive, in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Naples, Collier County, Florida. All information in the file has been evaluated and the review indicates that the currently proposed project is not contrary to the public interest. Please note that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has a different evaluation procedure and different regulations in which; a project may have to demonstrate to be "clearly within the public interest." The Corps has reviewed the project proposal and has determined that the proposed docking facility is not anticipated to adversely impact navigation, manatees, or mangroves. The proposed docking facility is to protrude less than 25 %, of the width of the waterway, which is generally greater than 200 feet wide, leaving adequate fairway for safe two -way vessel traffic. The project has additionally been reviewed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. Consultation with these agencies has determined that the project would not jeopardize the existence of any threatened or endangered species or adversely modify their critical habitat, or cause adverse impacts to other fish and wildlife. The applicant is additionally proposing a Manatee Educational Program for slip owners to further minimize specific risks to the manatee. Finally, the project is not anticipated to adversely impact the mangrove community as the only access walkway for the docks was originally permitted and mitigated for in 1999 as part of the original Dunes development, but has not been constructed to date. The docking facility is not anticipated to obstruct tidal flown or ' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY JACKSONVILLE DISTRLCT CORPS OF ENGINEERS FORT MYERS REGULATORY OFFICE 1520 ROYAL PALM SQUARE BLVD -, SUITIE 310 REPLY To FART MYERS, FLORIDA 33919 ATTENTION OF AUG 19 20D9 Regulatory Division Fort Myers Section SAJ- 2002- 02966(IP -LBD) Ms. Susan Leach Snyder Vanderbilt Surf Colony Ill Association 17 Bluebill Avenue, #803 Naples, Florida. 34108 Dear Ms. Snyder: Reference is made to your correspondence received in September 2007 objecting to the proposed Dunes Docks project. The Department of the.Army permit application number is SAJ-2002- 02966(IP -LBD). The project is located! within Water Turkey Bay at the intersection of 111th Avenue North and Vanderbilt Drive, in Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Naples, Collier County, Florida. All information in the file has been evaluated and the review indicates that the currently proposed project is not contrary to the public interest. Please note that the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has a different evaluation procedure and different regulations in which; a project may have to demonstrate to be "clearly within the public interest." The Corps has reviewed the project proposal and has determined that the proposed docking facility is not anticipated to adversely impact navigation, manatees, or mangroves. The proposed docking facility is to protrude less than 25 %, of the width of the waterway, which is generally greater than 200 feet wide, leaving adequate fairway for safe two -way vessel traffic. The project has additionally been reviewed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. Consultation with these agencies has determined that the project would not jeopardize the existence of any threatened or endangered species or adversely modify their critical habitat, or cause adverse impacts to other fish and wildlife. The applicant is additionally proposing a Manatee Educational Program for slip owners to further minimize specific risks to the manatee. Finally, the project is not anticipated to adversely impact the mangrove community as the only access walkway for the docks was originally permitted and mitigated for in 1999 as part of the original Dunes development, but has not been constructed to date. The docking facility is not anticipated to obstruct tidal flown or access. for vOl'dlife to these mangroves, and they are to remain protected as required in the original Dunes development permit. You also expressed concerns regarding noise, aesthetics, and pollution impacts to eater quality. The project has received water quality certification from the State of Florida, indicating that the proposed docking facility will not violate state water quality standards.. Conditions of the water quality certification are incorporated by reference as a general conditiion of all Department of the Army permits.. Impacts to aesthetics are additionally anticipated to be ;minimal as the docking facility is designed to, place a single roar of structures along a portion of the shoreline and is. no snore obtrusive to surrounding aesthetics than the existing man -made Marina basin and the sea.ralled property with high -rise condominiums and parking lots located on the opposite side of the waterway. Please note that noise generated Ibyr bouts that may use the docking facil''ity is outside the Corps' scope of analysis and control. You also requested a. public hearing. A. public hearing is not held untess additional information is, necessary to make. a. decision on the application. I have reviewed the information you provided and have concluded that there is no valid interest to be served by a. hearing. Therefore, I regret I can not support your request in this regard. Sincerely, Alfred A. Pantano,, Jr. Colonel, U.S. Army District Commander GundlachNancy From: StrainMark Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:42 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: Dunes Marina Project for oyur records /distribution Mark From: JjninfloridaPaol.com [Jjninflorida @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 4:33 PM To: StrainMark Subject: Dunes Marina Project Dear Sir, We are full time residents of the Dunes and are in support of the Marina Project. John and Grace Nichols 295 Grande Way PH -2 Naples, 34110 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 Collier County Planning Commission 3299 Tamiami Trail East Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112-5746 Re: The Dunes Docks Dear Planning Commissioners: I am a resident of The Dunes in North Naples and understand our permitted docks are to come before you for local government approval in February. Our community is excited about finally having the same boating and fishing access as the remainder of Vanderbilt Lagoon and Wiggins Pass residents. We understand that being one of the last docking facilities proposed in the area has the neighborhood overly emotional about this proposal, but we feel we should not be punished for being one of the newest (and last) developments constructed. Please bear in mind we have riparian rights and legal access to use our waterfront in a responsible manner, just as everyone else in the vicinity. The state and federal agencies have approved the plan after lengthy reviews and vetting of all environmental considerations. We are just asking for the same rights everyone else in this area has been granted and to not be singled out for denial based on overly emotional neighbors who already have their docks and boats, and who regularly use out waterway, but don't want to see us doing the same. We pay more for homes, higher taxes to this county, and higher insurance premiums for the right to live on the water here. We are merely asking for you to acknowledge the legality of our property rights, so we may begin to finally enjoy our waterways as /1-N everyone#lse in the neighborhood is already doing. Since AN Print Name t Address: IIAl 17 Date: i Collier County Planning Commission 3299 Tamiami Trail East Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112-5746 Re: The Dunes Docks Dear Planning Commissioners: I am a resident of The Dunes in North Naples and understand our permitted docks are to come before you for local government approval in February. Our community is excited about finally having the same boating and fishing access as the remainder of Vanderbilt Lagoon. and Wiggins Pass residents. We understand that being one of the last docking facilities proposed in the area has the neighborhood overly emotional about this proposal, but we feel we should not be punished for being one of the newest (and last) developments constructed. Please bear in mind we have riparian rights and legal access to use our waterfront in a responsible manner, just as everyone else in the vicinity. The state and federal agencies have approved the plan after lengthy reviews and vetting of all environmental ;onsiderations. We are just asking for the same rights everyone else in this area has been granted and to not be singled out for denial based on overly emotional neighbors who already have their docks and boats, and who regularly use out waterway, but don't want to see us doing the same. We pay more for homes, higher taxes to this county, and higher insurance premiums for the right to live on the water here. We are merely asking for you to acknowledge the legality of our property rights, so we may begin to finally enjoy our waterways as everyone else in the neighborhood is already doing. Sincerely, Print Name Address: Date: I/,— f March 21. 2012 Collier County Planning Commission 3299 Tamiami Trail East Suite 303 Naples, Florida 341112-5746 Re: The Dunes Docks Dear Planning Commissioners I am a resident of The Dunes in North Naples and understand our permitted docks are to come before you for local govemr-nent approval in February. Our community is excited about finally having the same boating and fishing access as the remainder of Vanderbilt Lagoon and Wiggins Pass residents, We understand that being one of the fast docking facilities proposed in the area has the neighborhood overly emotional about this proposal, but we feet we should not be punished for being one of the newest, and last, developments constructed. Please bear in mind we have riparian rights and legal access to use our waterfront in a responsible manner, just as everyone else in the vicinity. The state and federai agencies have approved the plan after lengthy reviews and vetting of all environmental considerations, We are just asking for the same rights ever ,yone else in this area has been granted and to not be singled out for denial based on overly emotional neighbors Who already have their docks and boats, and who regulariy use out waterway., but don't want to see us doing the same We pay more for homes., higher taxes to this county, and higher insurance premiums for the right to live on the water here, We are merely asking for you to acknowledge the legality of our property rights, so we may begin to finally enjoy our waterways as everyone else in the neighborhood is already doing Sincerely, Scott C- Bogdan 295 Grande Way #506 Naples; FL 34110 Stanley D. Dameron 315 Dunes Blvd Naples, Florida 34110 February 7, 2012 Dear Ms. Gundlach, I totally support Petition # BDE- PL2010 -979 and PDI- PL2012 -159 for boat slips at The Dunes development. I think the Dunes development is environmentally friendly, leaving the wide mangrove buffer between the improvements and the water. This amenity would have a small impact compared to the benefits of water access for the residents of The Dunes. I also feel that it is located in such a way as to not impede existing boating traffic. Please support this proposal for the taxpayers and residents of The Dunes. Respectfully, Stanley D. Dameron GundfachNancy i From: StrainMark Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:28 PM To: GundlachNancy Subject: FW: The Dunes Dock For your records Mark From: Joyce Frangakis [joyce @reynoldsservices.com] Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:15 AM To: BroughamPhil; SchifferBrad; pmidney(@collier.org; StrainMark; EbertDiane; K1einBarry; AhernMelissa; HomiakKaren; Vonier Bill Subject: The Dunes Dock February 16, 2012 Collier County Board of County Commission 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, Florida Re: The Dunes Docks Dear Commissioners: We are residents of The Dunes in North Naples and understand our permitted docks are to come before you for local government approval in March. Our community is excited about finally having the same boating and fishing access as the remainder of Vanderbilt Lagoon and Wiggins Pass residents. We understand that being one of the last docking facilities proposed in the area has the neighborhood overly emotional about this proposal, but we feel we should not be punished for being one of the newest (and last) developments constructed. Please bear in mind we have riparian rights and legal access to use our waterfront in a responsible manner, just as everyone else in the vicinity. The state and federal agencies have approved the plan after lengthy reviews and vetting of all environmental considerations. We are just asking for the same rights everyone else in this area has been granted and to not be singled out for denial based on overly emotional neighbors who already have their docks and boats, and who regularly use our waterway, but don't want to see us doing the same. We pay more for homes, higher taxes to this county, and higher insurance premiums for the right to live on the water here. We are merely asking for you to acknowledge the legality of our property rights, so we may begin to finally enjoy our waterways as everyone else in the neighborhood is already doing. Sincerely, F. John and Joyce Frangakis 285 Grande Way, #1601 Naples, FL 34110 1 CCPC RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER BDE- PL2010 -979 FOR A 261 -FOOT BOAT DOCK EXTENSION OVER THE MAXIMUM 20 FEET ALLOWED BY THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A TOTAL PROTRUSION OF 281 FEET FROM THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE WHICH WILL ALLOW A NEW DOCKING FACILITY OF APPROXIMATELY 11,300 SQUARE FEET OF OVER WATER STRUCTURE TO ACCOMMODATE 49 BOAT SLIPS ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE DUNES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AT 11495 VANDERBILT BEACH DRIVE IN SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance 04 -41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which are provisions for granting extensions for boat docks; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), being duly appointed, has held a properly noticed public hearing and has considered the advisability of a 261 -foot extension over the maximum 20 -foot limit provided in LDC Section 5.03.06 to allow a 281 -foot protrusion for an 11,300 -foot boat dock facility on submerged lands adjacent to the Dunes Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the CCPC has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by LDC Section 5.03.06; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given the opportunity to be heard by this Commission in public meeting assembled, and the Commission having considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: Petition Number BDE- PL2010 -979, filed on behalf of Vanderbilt Partners II, Ltd by Timothy Hall of Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described as: See Exhibit "A" Vanderbilt Partners 1I, Ltd/ BDE-PL2010 -979 Revised 2 /2/12 Page 1 of 2 Attachment D be and the same is hereby approved for a 261 -foot extension of a boat dock over the maximum 20 -foot limit to allow a 281 -foot protrusion for an 11,300 -foot boat dock facility that will accommodate 49 boat slips, as shown on the proposed site plan attached hereto as Exhibit `B ", on submerged lands adjacent to the Dunes Planned Unit Development, and subject to the Conditions of Approval attached as Exhibit "C ". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and filed with the County Clerk's Office. This Resolution shall be effective as provided in Exhibit "C ". This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of ATTEST: Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator Growth Management Division Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton -Cicko Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation 2012. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Mark P. Strain, Chairman Attachments: Exhibit A — Legal Description Exhibit B — Proposed Site Plan Exhibit C — Conditions Exhibit D — Draft Conservation Easement CP\ 10 -CPS - 01042\40 Vanderbilt Partners II, Ltd/ BDE- PL2010 -979 Revised 2/2/12 Page 2 of 2 All of Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.1 Addition, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 10, at Page 81 of the Public Records of Collier County Florida, and all of Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.l,: according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 10, at Page 44 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot 4 of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 Addition; thence N.89 152'20 "W. along the southerly line of said Lot 4, a distance of 599.96 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 4, the same being the southeast corner of Lot 10, Block 1 of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1: thence N.89 °52'20 "W. along the southerly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1, a distance of 1400.65 feet to the southwest corner of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.l; thence N.00°14'00 "W. along the westerly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.I, a distance of 1608.90 feet; thence N.34 °26115 "E. along said westerly line, a distance of 439.48 feet to a point on the northerly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.l; thence N.87 048'00 "E. along said northerly line, a distance of 1481.48 feet to the northeast corner of lot 3, block 3 of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.l; thence S.02 112'00 "E. a distance of 163.77 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3 of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.l; thence N.87 °48'00 "E. a distance of 200.00 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence S.02 °12'00 "E. along the easterly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.l, a distance of 668.16 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1 of said' Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.l, the same being the northeast corner of lot I of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No. 1 Addition; thence S.02 °12'00 "E. along the easterly line of said Wiggins Pass Landings Unit No.I Addition, a distance of 1209.93 feet to the point of beginning, parcel contains 88.56 acres, more or less. it A 77 STATE OF F'LOF; I L7A N A, ;0X�•-w s E NAPLES r �1 M ISLAND i tiuly or wmco EVERGLADES CITY COLLIER COUNTY SITE ADDRESS: <> 11495 VANDERBILT DR NAPLES, FL 34108 k .MYERS" KEY WEST ...e-':� NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURP AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION •+ L-m f II wc. IN cu ro J. —LONGITUDE: W 81° 49' 15" COUNTY AERIAL tz Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. LAA`F V ■ M DE&GNEO. T.T.T. t1t66l�8 evv ° bfVP4wx 01J) -)Otl NJR � BAY _ T H E [� lJ N � S SUBJECT Marine & EnNironmental Consulting PROPERTY D;V -2004 35!14 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 341(14-3732 LOCATION MAP JOB Np; 9]iG ]. NON i SHEET NO.; 01 OF 18 Ak7tlitJ te(t&'F ��ryliE"$t:3x o4 20w - Er nail: Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 of d **GIN, Napi" Pmt = SECTION -20 IA Hri SMm Scho�d l#Al APArtJ 'KlVE 4t:l ` AN A! N I w' �"� r :town EyJi'i"!k'G IISHDI, TA. ,. t N7f Fr N i - + 1111h Ave. — N. .;;sf`ti ".k!tltiki.F:gSip'. ,rre a..._._'�f RfRJ1TA .IM i' N VICINITY MAP 1 COUNTY AERIAL Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. DE&GNEO. T.T.T. 5. NMJ 01J) -)Otl NJR -.0 NEWS TAND Otl4EN910N9 T H E [� lJ N � S RMtER1ALS Marine & EnNironmental Consulting G A-�" D;V -2004 35!14 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 341(14-3732 LOCATION MAP JOB Np; 9]iG ]. NON za>zo,o SHEET NO.; 01 OF 18 o4 20w - Er nail: Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -48S RANGE -25E a WATER TURKEY BAY b to w ' WETLANQ I LINE MHW LINE/ PROPERTY LINE MANGROVE FRINGE LINE 01p_# BUILDING LIMITS i j{f 4'� n (00 200 .0 Aft L 0 NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW <> APPLICANT OWNS APPROX. 9467 L.F. OF SHORELINE. <> WIDTH OF WATERWAY: APPX. 226' (MHW TO MHW) <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0.4' NGVD, MHW-- +1.4' NGVD. <> SURVEY COURTESY OF " BBLS" SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 MHW LINEI PROPERTY LINE 4. WETLAND LINE BUILDING LIMITS N- ors ' o Rao 2oO 400 n l c° SC?ICE 7N 4EZr 0 NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW <> APPLICANT OWNS APPROX. 9467 L.F. OF SHORELINE. <> WIDTH OF WATERWAY: APPX. 226' (MHW TO MHW) <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0,4' NGVD, MHW-- +1.4' NGVD. <> SURVEY COURTESY OF " DOLS" SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 .r MHW LINE! +� PROPERTY LINE pQFt�S pr 1 z , 1 MANGROVE s FRINGE LINEk. MHW LINE/ WATER �, PROPERTY LINE TURKEY - -�- BAY `- APPROMMATE CHANNEL LOCATION ' T.T.T . 5. Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc, UESIGNEU. T' H E D l.J N E S °um'a" °'Z Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED N-17.2010 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104.3732 EXISTING CONDITIONS SHEET NO.. 03oF1e Eauil :tuiu(d�NlTeihassociafes.com Phone:(239)643 -0166 Fax:(239)643 -6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -488 RANCE -25E xl <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW <> APPLICANT OWNS APPROX. 9467 L.F. OF SHORELINE. <> PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE: APPX. 11,300 SF <> WIDTH OF WATERWAY: APPX. 228' (MHW TO MHW) <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0.4' NGVD, MHW +1 A' NGVD, <> DREDGE VOLUME TO -4.5 FT. MLW: APPROX. 3400 CY DREDGE AREA: APPROX. 57384 SQ. FT. (1.32 ACRES) <> SURVEY COURTESY OF'BBLS' SURVEY DATED: 01- 132004 <> BOAT LIFTS OPTIONAL FOR ALL SLIPS <> ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY <> MAXIMUM VESSEL LENGTH: 35.0' <> MAXIMUM DRAFT: 3.0' MHW LINE) PROPERTY LINE WATER TURKEY n �- BAY �-D PROPOSED AWA PUMP -OUT STATION 1 BUILDING LIMITS WETLAND LINE Nii6m PROPOSED CART PATH MANGROVE FRINGE LINE " Val �;wal o roo 200 400 SCA,CE 9N 4'PE T AIL AREA 2 MHW LINE/ PROPERTY LINE F I 3 B PROPOSED DOCKS v -� _ a1 U U I r '�- �� • •-_ •_— CIIANN6L LOCATION _•••• -- APPROXNa7ECNAWELLOCATION ^— — _ APPROXIMATE � .-.- �r AMY ' acv ahe. as^ ...��„�,�.-e. ,z, aua. �'c. ^ «. y,i• .vta ' `'• `.,, 'id' �L 'aA e+ m*r+� -- �-u �cSSR- IGT a ir 4- „ i .t y - �e ; Turrell, ates, nc.Consulting THE �► L� ^♦ E 9239)643-6632 ��zl,o L 34104-3732 PROPOSED DESIGN W AERIAL —N0: II=I 2 - wwrm « —w 1. 32 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -485 RANGE -25E F I 3 NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW <> APPLICANT OWNS APPROX. 9467 L.F. OF SHORELINE. <> PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE: APPX. 11,300 SF <> VADTH OF WATERWAY: APPX. 226' (MHW TO MHV4 <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0.4' NGVD, MHW= +1.4' NGVD. <> DREDGE VOLUME TO -4.5 FT. MLW: APPROX. 3400 CY DREDGE ARENA APPROX. 57384 SQ. FT. (1.32 ACRES) <> SURVEY COURTESY OF "BBLS" SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 <> BOAT LIFTS OPTIONAL FOR ALL SLIPS <> ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY <> MAXIMUM VESSEL LENGTH: 35.0' <> MAXIMUM DRAFT: 3.0' PRpPOSED PUMP -OUT STATION N �.1 BUILDING LIMITS o 1o0 20. a 400 I J'C7iCE7N F'EE7 MHW LINE) �r1p PROPERTY LINE C C. m � WATER TURKEY D �ll I—I Ifb ""U BAY WETLAND LINE DETAIL AREA 9 � -- - -- _ - -- PROPOSED CART PATH j DETAIL AREA 2 5 MANGROVE MHW LINE! FRINGE LINE s PROPERTY LINE 11z I - - "I .�� jPROPOSED DOCKS APPROXIMATE CHANNEL LOCATION r' APPROXIMATE CHANNEL LOCATION • ^ -_ - ' Terrell Hall &Associates Inc. OHO T.TT. z _ VJL Marine & Environmental Consulting THE � <J N E S CREATED DRAM ATED 091] -4010 ] 35A4F.xchange Ave. Suite B. aples,FL34104.3732 PROPOSED DESIGN .EENO.: 0�,e Emil: nau ,uurclla ociales.com Phone: (239)6.13 -0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SFCTION -20 TOWNSHIP -403 RANGE -25E C m C' � MHW LINEI � PROPERTY LINE 0 MANGROVE N FRINGE LINE CART TURNAROUND/ ° PULL OFF n z PROPOSED FISHING PIER p B� D 5' 72' PROTRUSION B FROM MHWL E N Xc�s too .,cxeE <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW <> APPLICANT OWNS APPROX. 8467 L.F. OF SHORELINE. <> PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE: APPX.11,300 SF <> WIDTH OF WATERWAY: APPX. 226' (MHW TO MHW) <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0.4' NGVD, MHW= +1.4' NGVD. <> DREDGE VOLUME TO 11.5 FT. MLW: APPROX. 3400 CY DREDGE AREA: APPROX. 57364 SQ. FT. (1.32 ACRES) <> SURVEY COURTESY OF °BBLS' SURVEY DATED: 01- 13.2004 <> BOAT LIFTS OPTIONAL FOR ALL SLIPS <> ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY <> MAXIMUM VESSEL LENGTH: 35.0' <> MAXIMUM DRAFT: 3.0' 75' PROTRUSION J FROM MHWL PROPOSED DOCKS APPROXIMATE CHANNEL LOCATION �a fm SEAWALL e it, Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. DES.. T.TT. T'H E K> ES �M M Marine & 1;nvironmcntal Consulting ��o: 0667.]IH° 3. ' 91. �;t Y01.111 qM �EqU 35R41ixchange Ave. Suite B. \aplcs, FL 341W DETAIL AREA 1 -3732 1R E NO.: O60f 16 vrz oa v.m,o [anul:OLU�CIRilLSSOCIafmcom Phone: (239) G13 -0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SFCTION -20 TOWNSHIP -483 RANGE -25E 6 NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. C <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW b <> APPLICANT OWNS APPROX. 9467 L.F. OF SHORELINE. <> PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE: APPX. 11,300 SF <> WIDTH OF WATERWAY: APPX. 228' (MHW TO MHW) <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0.4' NGVD, MHW= +1.4' NGVD. <> DREDGE VOLUME TO -4.5 FT. MLW APPROX. 3400 CY DREDGE AREA APPROX. 57364 SO. FT. (1.32 ACRES) <> SURVEY COURTESY OF "BBLS' SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 <> BOAT LIFTS OPTIONAL FOR ALL SLIPS <> ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY <> MAXIMUM VESSEL LENGTH: 350 <> MAXIMUM DRAFT: 30 MANGROVE FRINGE LINE FROM MHWL ir,,, W, MHW UNEI PROPERTY LINE MHWL 13S. P FRC P 471- WIDTH (MHW TO MHW) IF 26' Im NOTES: — THESE DRAVMNGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW <> APPLICANT OWNS APPROX. 9467 L.F. OF SHORELINE. <> PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE: APPX. 11,300 SF <> WIDTH OF WATERWAY: APPX. 226' (MHW TO MHVV) <> TIDAL DATUM: MLVV-- -0.4' NGVD, MHW- 1 A' NGVD. <> DREDGE VOLUME TO -4,5 FT. MLW APPROX. 3400 CY DREDGE AREA: APPROX. 57364 S0. FT. (1.32 ACRES) <> SURVEY COURTESY OF `BBLS' SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 <> BOAT LIFTS OPTIONAL FOR ALL SLIPS <> ALL PILES VMLL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY —MAXIMUM VESSEL LENGTH: 35.0' o MAXIMUM DRAFT: 3.0' N WATER TURKEY BAY MHW LINE/ PROPERTY LINE MANGROVE N �x 'y 4 ,► n ioo 200 you WETLAND SC7(CE7NE7 LINE PROPOSED CART PATH t v 4q% _', ,, PROPOSED DOCKS 304• w OTH OF I 25% WIDTH OF WATERWAY NAVIGABLE MANGROVE WATERWAY 26W FRINGE LINE 264• 50% WIDTH OF WATERWAY M WIDTH OF WAIlRWAY 64' PROTRUMON yy� 240'WI DTH OFW , 249'WIOTH OF FROM MANGROVE 61'PROTRUSR)N g� NAVIGABLE T NAVIGABLE °=-' WATERWAY WATERWAY �, J�" as i''y .•_ t v 4q% _', ,, PROPOSED DOCKS MHW LINEI MANGROVE PROPERTY LINE FRINGE LINE 64' PROTRUMON 62' PROTRUSION FROM MANGROVE FROM MANGROVE 61'PROTRUSR)N FRINGE UNE FRINGE UWE FROM M OMOROVE FRINGE UNE a�Y 17, pg� 25% WIDTH OF WATERWAY I Y 25 %WIDTHOFWAIERWAY • �� `. Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. —�-- H DUNES -0,a „V .2,,m„ ADart „ „, Marine & Em omnental Consulting B P WIDTH OF NAVIGABLE WATERWAY JOB ?40- 04O 2. vA ��„ RM AERIA 3584F.xchan eAYe.SuileD. \a les,FL34I413732 sieeiHO_ aoFis vu an.zolo - - Emait:mni_atacll- 3S50C1xei.com Phone: (239)(43-0166 Fax:(239)643.6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSFIIP -483 F2ANGE-25E t I WATER TURKEY BAY WETLAND LINE MHW LINE/ PROPERTY LINE MANGROVE IMPACTS r �. o ruu zaa you BUILDING LIMITS '� SCFICE7N FFFT NOTES: r �> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES %. ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. _ <> SURVEY COURTESY OF "BBLS" SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 �> SEAGRASS BEDS ARE DYNAMIC IN NATURE AND THE EXACT FOOTPRINT WILL BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LOCAL BUILDING PERMIT. - - DIRECT MANGROVE IMPACTS 0.138 (ACRES): DETAIL AREA 1 PROPOSED CART PATH jjjjr,ETALAgEA 2 MANGROVE FRINGE LINE PROPOSED DOCKS E K , DF r Turell Hall & Associates, Inc, T H E p► N E S „ , -,,e nMarine & Environmental Consulting ,« W. 4. ,. 3584 Exdwnge Ave. Suite B. SapIa, FL 34104 -3732 IMPACTS MAP SHEET NO.. oe OF IS RY ATRIA );ml: Phune: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION -20 IOWNSHIP -48S RANGE -25E •'C oc �� 0 1 MHW LINE/ PROPERTY LINE MANGROVE FRINGE LINE CART TURNAROUND! a PULL OFF MANGROVE IMPACTS E N � X�r S �tl o ga foa z00 NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> SURVEY COURTESY OF "BBLS" SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 <> SEAGRASS BEDS ARE DYNAMIC IN NATURE AND THE EXACT FOOTPRINT WILL BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LOCAL BUILDING PERMIT. DIRECT MANGROVE IMPACTS (ACRES): �'13t3 ocslcneo- I T.U. s o Turre , Hall & Associates, Inc. THE L7 U N E S MA—BY Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: MM -0D -YYYY 3. ��: Ins t ExchangeAve.SuiteB. Naples, (:L341bt -3732 IMPACTS MAP DETAIL SHEET NO. + +vF,e +, Emil: tunagtmrell- associate;.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -485 RANGE -2 EE � I , 1 MHW LINE/ PROPERTY LINE MANGROVE FRINGE LINE CART TURNAROUND! a PULL OFF MANGROVE IMPACTS E N � X�r S �tl o ga foa z00 NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> SURVEY COURTESY OF "BBLS" SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 <> SEAGRASS BEDS ARE DYNAMIC IN NATURE AND THE EXACT FOOTPRINT WILL BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LOCAL BUILDING PERMIT. DIRECT MANGROVE IMPACTS (ACRES): �'13t3 ocslcneo- I T.U. s o Turre , Hall & Associates, Inc. THE L7 U N E S MA—BY Marine & Environmental Consulting CREATED: MM -0D -YYYY 3. ��: Ins t ExchangeAve.SuiteB. Naples, (:L341bt -3732 IMPACTS MAP DETAIL SHEET NO. + +vF,e +, Emil: tunagtmrell- associate;.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -485 RANGE -2 EE 1/2" SPACING FOR ALL DECK BOARDS .E WATERWAY )M MHW — 30.0' WIDTH OF DOCK WILL BE REDUCED TO 5 FT. IF GRASSES ARE LOCATED WITHIN 10 LINEAR FEET OF DOCK AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL TRIANGULAR CORNER DOCK BOX PROPOSED LIGHT 6.0' PROPOSED DOCK PILE WRAP N (SEE NOTE) MHW = 1.4 NGVD MLW = -0.4 NGVD 7 7. �S SLOPE: 2:1 MAX EXISTING BOTTOM NOTES: PLACE RIPRAP AT 100' INTERVALS PROPOSED DREDGE FOR A DISTANCE OF 100' ALONG <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES DEPTH 4.5' MLW THE LENGTH OF THE DREDGE AREA. ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW FILTER FABRIC <> PVC PILE WRAP WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 TO 60 MIL. FROM 6' BELOW PENETRATION TO V ABOVE MHW. SECTION A -A — ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY PC SCALE: 1" = 6' <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0.4' NGVD, MHW- +1.4' NGVD. "BBLS" to <> SURVEY COURTESY OF SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 A <> SEAGRASS BEDS ARE DYNAMIC IN NATURE AND THE jw EXACT FOO IPRINI WILL BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LOCAL BUILDING PERMIT. PM`s, o ■+ Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 7— H E �-� ^� E �`-� NS: _ -EATEO "FIANGE-25E Marine &Environmental Consulting " 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 31104.3732 SECTION A -A "NO.-- 07r Z EIIldl�: luna4LL'IBiI- �Yi1xille5.CU10 Phone:(239)643 -0166 Fax:(239)643 -6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -483 G b SS' INTO NAVIGABLE WATERWAY 75' FROM MHW y--= r- PROPOSED LIGHT WIDTH OF DOCK WILL BE REDUCED TO 5 FT. IF GRASSES ARE LOCATED WITHIN 10 LINEAR FEET OF DOCK AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION —6.0'----L PROPOSED DOCK TYPICAL MARGINAL DOCK BOX 1/2" SPACING FOR ALL DECK BOARDS GRATE MATERIAL TO _ALLOW FOR LIGHT PENETRATION BOARDWALK. ELEVATION OF CANTILEVER FINISHED DECK MHW = 1,4 NGVQ DOCK BOX RAMP NG 5.0' MHW STRIER MATERIAL 3" X 8" MLW = -0.4 NGVD PROPOSED DREDGE DEPTH -4.5' MLW SECTION B -B SCALE: V = 6' BOTTOM __PILE WRAP 1 SLOPE (SEE NOTE) NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. — ALL OAT UM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW <> PVC PILE WRAP WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 TO 60 MIL. FROM 6' BELOW PENETRATION TO V ABOVE MHW. — ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW-- -0.4' NGVD, MHW-- +1.4' NGVD. — SURVEY COURTESY OF "BBLS' SURVEY DATED: 01 -13 -2004 <> SEAGRASS BEDS ARE DYNAMIC IN NATURE AND THE EXACT FOOTPRINT WILL BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LOCAL BUILDING PERMIT. �7 NJ E ND° Y'. - NU T T. ; TTurell, Hall & Associates, Inc. IF— d E Marine & Envirmunenal ConSUILing �. OB- OSZ007 3, mnr !DU NO YTJV 3584 Exchange Ave. Suite R. Naples, FL 3x141 -3732 SECTION 13-13-13 -z — 8t1EETND.. a oF,e ,. Email:Ijn4I e11- ociitaa.com Phone: Fax:(239)643.6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -48S RANCE -25E r 1 Terrell, Hall & Associates, Inc, Marine & Environmental Consulting 3 Ave. Suitc B. \'spies, FL 34104 -3732 Email:imci! associva car. Phone. (239) 643 -0166 Pax: (239) 613 -6632 SECTION C-C SCALE: 1" = G' BOARDWALK ELEV. APPROX. V ABOVE EXISTING ELEVATION OR MHW LINE 12" Pilings in Water to be PVC Wrapped 6" Above MHW to 6" Below Substrate. NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW o PVC PILE WRAP WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 TO 60 MIL. FROM 6" BELOW PENETRATION TO V ABOVE MHW. <> ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0.4' NGVO, MHW-- +1.4' NGVD. <> SURVEY COURTESY OF "86LS' SURVEY DATED: 01- 132004 oes�craEO r. i.i. T' H E [::: 3 0 U N E S SECTION C -C SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -483 RANCE -25E " 0 °ul ROOF TO MATCH PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES EDUCATIONAL DISPLAY ON "NO MOORING" SIGNS TO BE FISHERIEWlESTUARIES OF PLACED ON EAST, NORTH AND SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WEST FACE OF FISHING PIER, 2 PROPOSED DOCK ALL RAawcsTOBEa,r ELEVATION: 3.0' MHW PROPOSED LIGHT ABOVE FINISHED DECK NAVIGATION WARNING LIGHT 1/2" SPACING FOR ACCESS TYPICAL TRIANGULAR ALL DECK BOARDS z WALKWAY CORNER DOCK BOX ELEVATION OF� A FINISHED DECK: 5.0' MH I I 0 0 MHW -1A NGVD MLW = -0.4 NGVD -_m._. ... APPROX EXISTING BOTTOM ELEVATION PILE WRAP CROSS SECTION D -D' SCALE 1 "= 10' NOTFS: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW <> PVC PILE WRAP VNLL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 TO 60 MIL. FROM 6' BELOW PENETRATION TO V ABOVE MHW. I<> ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0.4' NGVD, MHW= +1.4' NGVD. <> SURVEY COURTESY OF'BBLS' SURVEY DATED: 01- 13-2004 Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. �' Marine & F,nvironmental Consulting THE E S CREATED. 04058001 JOf1 NO.w -� a. om Exchange hone: (Arc. Suite 66 B. Naples, Fax (2 34104-3732 SECTION D -D WEEi NO.: 15 0E lfi 1 _ _ EL: .7I:NOSat1¢iC;t- NSSOC171Ci.COtG Phone: (239)613 -0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -488 RANGE -25E n 3 0 s It ta �Q fD O 1 PROPOSED PUMP OUT STATION: 313 SQ. FT. BUILDING SEE DETAIL 1 BOARDWALK ELEVATION V ABOVE GRADE PERMITTED BOARDWALK 4 WETLAND LINE E 'k �y�,X�II..��yy�s 44 1( o 30 6o +2o scAamlarr BUILDING NOTES: <> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW <> APPLICANT OWNS APPROX. 9467 L.F. OF SHORELINE. <> PROPOSED OVERWATER STRUCTURE: APPX. 11,300 SF <> WIDTH OF WATERWAY: APPX. 226' (MHW TO MHM <> TIDAL DATUM: MLW= -0.4' NGVD, MHW= +1.4' NGVD. <> DREDGE VOLUME TO -4.5 FT. MLW: APPROX. 3400 CY DREDGE AREA: APPROX. 57364 SQ. FT. (1.32 ACRES) <> SURVEY COURTESY OF'BBLS' SURVEY DATED: 01- 132004 — BOAT LIFTS OPTIONAL FOR ALL SLIPS <> ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY <> MAXIMUM VESSEL LENGTH: 35.0' <> MAXIMUM DRAFT: 3.0' Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc, w,t ;" M14arine & Envirorunental Consulting THE G LJ f y E ��. 0946-2003 x viz 0„7.201;' JOB NO.: 0729 2 3584ExchangeAve. Suite D. \ap1m,F1.34I>•1 -3732 DETAIL - PUMP OUT STATION S B�1B a27- . - Email: Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239)643.6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP - 48 3 FRANGE -25E E, R Q Si i m s 112" SPACING FOR ALL DECK BOARDS MHW =1.4 NGVD MLW = -0.4 NGVD "rS PROPOSED BOAT LIFT 10.0' 30.0' WIDTH OF DOCK WILL BE REDUCED TO 5 FT. IF GRASSES ARE LOCATED WITHIN 10 LINEAR FEET OF DOCK AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL TRIANGULAR CORNER DOCK BOX PLACE RIPRAP AT 100' INTERVALS PROPOSED DREDGE FOR A DISTANCE OF 100' ALONG DEPTH -4.5' MLW THE LENGTH OF THE DREDGE AREA. FILTER FABRIC SCALE: 1" = 6' PROPOSED LIGHT PROPOSED DOCK PILE WRAP (SEE NOTE) ?O. SL OPE: 2:1 MAX EXISTING BOTTOM SL NOTES: — THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. — ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW — PVC PILE WRAP WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 TO 60 MIL. FROM 6" BELOW PENETRATION TO V ABOVE MHW. o ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TURBIDITY o TIDAL DATUM: MLW- -0.4' NGVD, MHW- +1.4' NGVD. <> SURVEY COURTESY OF "BBLS' SURVEY DATED: 01- 13-2004 o SEAGRASS BEDS ARE DYNAMIC IN NATURE AND THE EXACT FOOTPRINT WILL BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LOCAL BUILDING PERMIT. 11, T.T.T. 5. _ urrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. T H E DUNE ;xx;aY. R�, - - Marine & Environmental Consulting "NO. 9719 - _ 3A Naples, FL 341(4 -3732 TYPICAL FINGER PIER SECTIONS 5l1EETNO. 101 11 . 1 1 1 - )md-.: tllnS&- t:nR14550CIaX5.CoTn Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239)6a3 -6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -4B5 RANGE -25E Heavy Duty 5t.Weu Shei:Latar9•••• or High Speed Painted plater. G.Id— E.darlvt • • • • • • • • B1gh Torque Sea -DAun or flaRPI.Lr Drtve. Ca--W 5ertea scud Sh.R amd Wtnd,'urkh Daap Gram -e. fur 4inir -1 Cable W'. .'d F. d- Li3img Sp..d. Serf Mai Zino ..... oa A Lift AS Framxa.ra —1ded by Expert = Weld.. ...... Stow— St.] Pain, ar 0.4 M—t Br..s.t Ii.a.y Daly • • • • GWd. Point Buupen C.rp.td wood Swam mr .pti ..ID.a ry Drt Ahm I -Beam arE b.&dTrmd@r mu'*. WIDTH OF DOCK WILL BE REDUCED TO 5 FT. IF GRASSES ARE LOCATED WITHIN 10 LINEAR FEET OF DOCK AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED DOCK 6.0' PROPOSED BOAT LIFT 3.0' MHW =1A NGVD —" 0K STRINGER MLW = -OA NGVD 1 1 NERIAL EXISTING BOTTOM PROPOSED DREDGE DEPTH -4.5' MLW \— PILE WRAP 1 SLOPE (SEE NOTE) SCALE: 1" = 6' NOTES: — THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. <> ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO MLW o PVC PILE WRAP WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 30 TO 80 MIL. FROM 6" BELOW PENETRATION TO V ABOVE MHW. — ALL PILES WILL BE DRIVEN TO MINIMIZE TUR131DITY — TIDAL DATUM: MLW-- -0.4' NGVD, MHW-- +1,4' NGVD. <> SURVEY COURTESY OF'BBLS' SURVEY DATED: 01- 13.2004 o SEAGRASS BEDS ARE DYNAMIC IN NATURE AND THE EXACT FOOTPRINT WILL BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LOCAL BUILDING PERMIT. Ucsavaco- Terrell, Hall &Associates, Inc. T' H E GUN E S URAp.i DY RW 4. Marine & Environmental Consulting ° �"'� *2-17-2012 n JOR ND: 9r)m ]. 358MExchange Ave. Suite R Naples, FL 34104-3732 TYPICAL PARALLEL LIFT SECTIONS SHEET m, 1. - - Email: hra(atuly4mmiateS.C= PhD=(239)643 -0166 Fax:(239)643 -6632 SECTION -20 TOWNSHIP -483 RANGE -25E NOTES: o THESE DRAVANGS ARE FOR PER6KTTMNG Pu1wowS ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONl TRXTION USE o ALL DATUM SHOWN HEREON p REFERENCED TO NLW o APPLICANT OWNS APPROX INA L.F. OF SNO/E LIW o PROPOSED OVERVIMTER STRUCTURE APPX 11.300 OF o VWIDTH OF VWRTERVMY APPX 2W POWTO M HWJ a TIDAL OAT NI 6iLVV= -", N(IVO. NMF .01 & NOVD o DREDGE VOLUME TO 4b FT MLW APPROIL 3100 CY DREDGE AREA. APPROX. SrM SO. FT. (1.32 ACRES) a w oucv rry mxgrr ex •� SURVEY DATED: 0I-13 -1004 o BOAT LFM OPTIONAL FOR ALL $UPS o ALL PILES WALL BE DRIVEN TO YDIIIJW TA OWN o YAXIMLI i VESSEL LENGTFt 3W o NIAXINIMN DRAFT. 30 V WIDE ACCESS WALKWAY BUILOIN6G Llmffs C WIDE ACCESS DOCK WATER TURKEY BAY F' Alk ! use " r .... ,a ^— — ... 4 ,•_ M71R,:5Y7A6its C#u -# a rK #"mv --•�. Tmre Hall & Associates, Marine & &Yiraam nwl Coeaul igo 3W &C*p Ava. Mae & Mlpim F1.3aW3732 DOCK ACCESS f; F 4 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL FOR BDE- PL2010 -979 1. The Conservation Easement, attached as Exhibit "D" to this Resolution, from Owner to Collier County as described in Sections 4.5 and 5.10 of Ordinance number 2000 -74, the Dunes PUD, shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County at time of building permit application free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, except for conservation easements to other governmental agencies. This boat dock extension shall not be effective until the date of recordation of the Conservation Easement in the public records of Collier County. 2. As required by the section 3.2.3.1 Wiggins Pass Area of the Manatee Protection Plan dated May, 1995 and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners: "the waters of the Wiggins Pass area are very shallow, on average less than 5 feet at Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). The Army Corps of Engineers designed the Wiggins Pass System for Moot draft vessels, and current maintenance dredging permits are based on the 3 -foot draft design. All marina or multi -dock facilities should advise their patrons of this potential draft limitation. Provisions should be made for posting the draft limitations on nautical charts, in notices to mariners and possible signs at the pass entrance." Therefore, boats at this multi -dock facility shall have no more than a 3 -foot draft. 3. Prior to Site Development Plan approval, Owner shall provide a Construction Management and Restoration Plan to address the submerged marine habitat by providing for: construction techniques to limit turbidity and sedimentation of seagrass beds; and provision for other recreated submerged habitat such as using rip -rap to create substrate for colonization of oysters. 4. The boat docks are limited to the use of the residents of the Dunes Planned Unit Development. There shall be no commercial use and/or shuttle use of the boat docks. 5. Where a docking facility is built within 10 feet of seagrass beds, the following conditions shall be met: a. The dock shall be at a height of at least 3.5 feet NGVD. b. The terminal platform area of the dock shall not exceed 160 square feet. C. The access dock shall not exceed a width of 4 feet subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) provisions. 6. Seagrass beds are dynamic in nature and the exact footprint of seagrass beds will be determined by owner between March 15 and October 15 (Seagrass Bed Growing Season). Owner shall submit a written survey performed during the most recent Seagrass Bed Growing Season by a licensed environmental professional, prior to issuance of the county building permit. I O-CPS-0 1 042\60 EXHIBIT C DunesBD- PL2010 -979 Rev. 2 /21/12 ADDRESS• PARCEL LD. # CONSERVATION EASEMENT THIS LINE THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT given this day of 20-_--, by [Name of Grantor] (hereinafter [short name] ), as Grantor, whose address Is [address of Grantor] to Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter "Collier County" or "Grantee "). Grantor and Grantee may hereafter be collectively referred to as the "parties." WHEREAS, [Grantor] is the owner of that certain tract of land located in Collier County, Florida described In Exhibit "A" [include a Plat Book and Page reference in Exhibit "A"] attached hereto (hereinafter referred to as the "property'; and WHEREAS, Collier County is requiring that this Conservation Easement ("Easement) be entered into and recorded in the land records of Collier County to bind [Grantor] • and WHEREAS, the parties wish to establish their respective rights and responsibilities relative to the use and maintenance of the conservation area described in the attached Composite Exhibit "B" (the Easement Property). NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor hereby conveys a Conservation Easement to. Collier County as follows: 1. [Grantor] , its successors, heirs, assigns and /or transferees, hereby grants a non - exclusive easement to Collier County over and across the property described as Exhibit "B" for the purpose of conservation. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of the conservation easement. Revised 3/10/11 Exhibit D 2.: No buildings; structures: or (mpOdiments of any nature may be constructed,- placed'or permitted on; over:or across the Easement Property. No dumping or placing of soll ..or other .substances. such as trash or unsightly. or . offensive materials shall be permitted on the Easement ProPerty. There shall be no removal or'destruction:.of trees,. I shrubs or. other vegetation with the. exception of exotic /nuisance vegetation . removal. Excavation; dredging or .removal of soil material, peat,. rock or other material substance. . In such a manner as-to affect the surface shah be prohibited- on the'Easemenit Property. No, dikes or fencing shall be permitted on the Easement Property. There shall be no other activities detrimental to drainage,, flood control, - water conservation, erosion, control or fish and wildlife habitat. 'conservation' or preservation 'permitted on the Easement Property. The Easement Property shall be in no way altered from its natural or permitted state. -The following exceptions apply: a. Archaeological surveys or excavations are permissible for areas designated as archaeological sites by the State or Federal governments or by Grantee; or b. Uses as permitted by Section 3.05.07.1-1 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 3. [Grantor] f its heirs, successors or assigns shall bear the responsibility for maintaining the Easement Property, Including, but not limited to, regular maintenance as may be required by any governmental agency having jurisdiction relative thereto. The Easement Property shall at all times be maintained in accordance with applicable requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4. No right of access by the general public to any part of the Easement Property is being conveyed. Collier County shall have the right to access and use of the Easement property for the purpose of making inspections; however, Collier County shall have no obligation to maintain the Easement Property, nor shall Collier County have the right to use the Easement Property for any purpose inconsistent with the terms of this Conservation Easement. 5. Grantor reserves all rights as owner of the Easement Property, including the right to engage in uses of the Easement Property that are not prohibited herein and which are not inconsistent with any County ordinance, regulation or development permit, and the intent and purposes of this Conservation Easement. 6. Grantor shall pay any and all real property taxes and assessments levied by competent authority on the property. 7. Grantor shall insert the terms and restrictions of this Conservation Easement in any subsequent deed or other legal instrument by which Grantor divests itself of any interest in the property. 8. All notices, consents, approvals or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly given If sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the appropriate party or successor in interest. Revised 3/10/11 2 9. This Conservation - Easement may be. amended, altered, released. or revoked on by written agreement between parties hereto or'their heirs, successors or assigns, which shall be filed in'the public records'of Collier.County.. :10. This Conservation Easement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of ail present and future owners of any portion of the Property . and their successors and /or assigns, it being the intention of the Grantor. that this Conservation Easement be perpetual. . 11. If any provisions of the Conservation Easement or the application thereof' to any person or circumstances is found to be Invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this Conservation Easement shall not be'affected thereby, as long as the purpose of the Conservation Easement is preserved. 12. Enforcement of the terms, provisions and restrictions of this Conservation Easement shall be at the reasonable discretion of Grantee, and any forbearance on. behalf of Grantee to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any breach hereof by Grantor, shall not be deemed or construed, to be a waiver of Grantee's rights hereunder. 11. The terms and conditions of this Conservation Easement may be enforced by the Grantee by injunctive relief and other appropriate .available remedies, and Grantor consents that venue of such enforcement actions shall lie exclusively in the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida. In any enforcement action In which the Grantee prevails, Grantee shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs In the trial and appellate courts in addition to the cost of restoring the land to the natural vegetative and hydrologic condition existing at the time of execution of this Conservation Easement or to the natural vegetative state required for a development permit. These remedies are in addition to any other remedy, fine or penalty, which may be applicable under Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunder set its hand and seal the day and year first above written. Sign, sealed and delivered in the presence of: WITNESSES: Printed Name: Printed Name: Revised 3/10/11 3 [NAME OF GRANTOR] By: STATE.OP FLORIDA:') COUNTY OF COLLIER ) The foregoing Instrument was subscribed, sworn and acknowledged before. me this day of 20_ by [authorized signdr of Grantor entityl as [title] for [entity] and who is [ ] personally known 'to me or [ ], who produced as identification. My Commission Expires: Acceptance by Grantee: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton -Cicko Assistant County Attorney CAI I- ENS - 0044214 Revised 3%10/11 4 NOTARY PUBLIC Printed Name: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FRED W. COYLE, Chairman �ft. EXHIBIT "A" EASEMENT PROPERTY The Easement Property consists of the contiguous parcels of land described on Exhibits "Al" and "AT' attached hereto. A 49 CMSv " f*ser wk SURVEYORS & MAPPERS INC. 1502 -A RAIL, HEAD BLVD. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 TEL. 941 -597 -1315 FAX 941 -597 -5207 CONSERVATION EASEMENT A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTII, .RANGE 25 EAST ; THENCE N.89 °52'20"W., ALONG THE SOUTH LAVE OF SAID SECTION 20, A DISTANCE OF 1316.81 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID SOUTH LINE THENCE N.00 °07'40 "E., A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY OF BLUE BILL AVENUE, A NINETY FOOT RIGHT OF WAY AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED.; THENCE N.89 052'20 "W., ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 487.50 FEET; THENCE N.00 014'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 41.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE VANDERBILT CHANNEL; THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE IN THE FOLLOWING NINETY NINE DESCRIBED COURSES 1) THENCE N.22 °2748 "E., A DISTANCE OF 4.37 FEET, 2) THENCE N.45-21-34"E., A DISTANCE OF 20.89 FEET; 3) 'THENCE N.07 °40'10 "E., A DISTANCE OF 36.63 FEET; 4) TFIENCE N.30 °55'I0 "E., A DISTANCE OF 17.56 FEET; 5) THENCE M34 °36'33 "E., A DISTANCE OF 17.56 FEET; 6) THENCE N.38-1 1'04"E., A DISTANCE OF 22.70 FEET; 7) THENCE N.26 02834 "E., A DISTANCE OF 45.88 FEET; 8) THENCE N.47 °03'39 "E., A DISTANCE OF 30.33 FEET; 9) THENCEN.21 °36'35 "E., ADISTANCE OF 13.33 FEET; 10) THENCE S. 55019'56"E., A DISTANCE OF 26.82 FEET, 11) THENCE N.75 030'07 "E., A DISTANCE OF 63.12 FEET; 12) THENCE N.54 °19'45 "E., A DISTANCE OF 26.39 FEET; 13) TBENCE S.3 8057-221-B., A DISTANCE OF 28.08 FEET; 14) THENCE S.20 04237 "E., A DISTANCE OF 30.10 FEET, 15) TIMNCE S. 55-28-32"W., A DISTANCE OF 26.35 FEET; 16) THENCE S. 15018'29"W., A DISTANCE OF 22.23 FEET; 17) THENCE S.55 015'32 "E., A DISTANCE OF 35.67 FEET, 18) THENCE S.44 °11'21 "E., A DISTANCE OF 19.22 FEET; 19) THENCE S.54 °45'21 "E., A DISTANCE OF 13.06 FEET, 20) THENCE N.59 048'06 "E., A DISTANCE OF 19.10 FEET; 21) THENCE N.33 005'56 "E., A DISTANCE OF 21.28 FEET; 1 OF 5 • , 22) THENCE N.01 °0927 "E., A DISTANCE OF 42.95 FEET; 23) THENCE N.08 °5442 "E., A DISTANCE OF 15.54 FEET; 24) THENCE S.89°2723 "W., A DISTANCE OF 27.24 FEET; 25) THENCE N.54 °08'30 "W., A DISTANCE OF 21.49 FEET; 26) THENCE N.42 °41'44 "E., A DISTANCE OF 26.82 FEET; 27) THENCE N.23 °30159 "W., A DISTANCE OF 26.62 FEET; 28) THENCE N.73 °34'34 "W., A DISTANCE OF 36.87 FEET; 29) THENCE N. 13"1727"W., A DISTANCE OF 18.87 FEET; 30) THENCE N.04n9'38 "W., A DISTANCE OF 22.33 FEET; 31) THENCE N. 14-47'00'V., A DISTANCE OF 48.76 FEET; 32) THENCE N. 17 °54'54 "W., A DISTANCE OF 32.99 FEET; 33) THENCE N. 13-25'3.6"W., A DISTANCE OF 29.50 FEET 34) THENCE N.09 °09'57 "W., A DISTANCE OF 26.16 FEET; 35) THENCE N. 10'41'35"W., A DISTANCE OF 20.88 FEET; 36) THENCE N.19 °14'13 "W., ADISTANCE OF 35.48 FEET; 37) THENCE N. 13"42'04"W., A DISTANCE OF 27.27 FEET; 38) THENCE N.39 °57'13 "W., ADISTANCE OF 27.28 FEET; 39) THENCE N.40022'08 "W., A DISTANCE OF 7.41 FEET; 40) 'THENCE N.47-17-3 I "W., A DISTANCE OF 18.84 FEET; 41) THENCE N.54°04'49"W., A DISTANCE OF 14.07 FEET; 42) THE�NCE N.05 °32'52 "W., A DISTANCE OF 15.04 FEET; 43) THENCE N.20 °45'24"E., A DISTANCE OF 19.02 FEET; 44) THENCE N.33 °44'29 "W., A DISTANCE OF 22.45 FEET; 45) THENCE N.4600847"W., A DISTANCE OF 14.97 FEET; 46) THENCE S.88 °45'50 "W., A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 47) THENCE N.87 012'04 "W., A DISTANCE OF 15.73 FEET; 48) THENCE N.45 °04'17 "W., A DISTANCE OF 23.41 FEET; 49) THENCE N.59 032'42 "W., A DISTANCE OF 19.19 FEET; 50) THENCE N.15 °46'11 "E., A DISTANCE OF 19.07 FEET; 51) THE14CE N. 16017'48'V., A DISTANCE OF 20.58 FEET; 52) THENCE N.25 °3941 "W., A DISTANCE OF 24.57 FEET; 53) THENCE N.00°24'25 "W., A DISTANCE OF 29.74 FEET; 54) THENCE N.16 °12'38 "W., A DISTANCE OF 21.84 FEET; 55) THENCE N.06 °24'00E., A DISTANCE OF 23.53 FEET; 56) THENCE N.00 °1 1'20 "E., A DISTANCE OF 28.03 FEET; 57) THENCE N.03 °52'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 20.05 FEET; 58) THENCE N.02-17-1 V"W., A DISTANCE OF 15.60 PEET; 59) THENCE N. 12055'13"E., A DISTANCE OF 16.98 FEET; 60) THENCE N.03 °19'54 "W., A DISTANCE OF 17.22 FEET; 61) THENCE N.03 053'33 "E., A DISTANCE OF 34.03 FEET; 62) THENCE N.03 °48'31"E., A DISTANCE OF 28.62 FEET; 63) THENCE N.03 °06'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 28.51 FEET; 64) THENCE N.07 °50' 12 "W., A DISTANCE OF 27.58 FEET; 65) THENCE N.01 °03'54 "E., A DISTANCE OF 18.08 FEET; 66) THENCE N.05-47'53 -W, A DISTANCE OF 26.12 FEET; 2OF5 �::'•;..r3: a. of 67) THENCE N.14.21'01 "W., STANCE OF 23.99 FEET; 68) THENCE N.01 °18'39 "E., A DISTANCE OF 20.78 FEET; 69) THENCE N.09 °00'32 "E., A DISTANCE OF 31.80 FEET; 70) THENCE N.00 037'32 "E., A DISTANCE OF 26.47 FEET; 71) THENCE N.02 049'07 "E., A DISTANCE OF 29.20 FEET; 72) THENCE N.02 °58'47 "E., A DISTANCE OF 30.28 FEET; 73) THENCE N.00 °50'14 "W., A DISTANCE OF 24.92 FEET; 74) THENCE N. 16-54'54"W., A DISTANCE OF 25.04 FEET; 75) THENCE N.05 °54'42 "E., A DISTANCE OF 24.89 FEET; 76) THENCE N.04 °40'05 "E., A DISTANCE OF 27.35 FEET; 77) THENCE N.05 °49'36 "W., A DISTANCE OF 25.87 FEET; 78) THENCE N.09-1 1'48"E., A DISTANCE OF 22.23 FEET; 79) THENCE N.07 °59'19 "E., A DISTANCE OF 32.14 FEET; 80) THENCE N.06 °19'23 "E., A DISTANCE OF 28.29 FEET; 81) THENCE N.074T00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 25.29 FEET; 82) THENCE N.03 °09'34 "W., A DISTANCE OF 23.35 FEET; 83) THENCE N.04 °0022 "E., A DISTANCE OF 21.98 FEET; 84) THENCE N.18 °13'30 "E., A DISTANCE OF 20.15 FEET; 85) THENCE N.50 °36'34M., A DISTANCE OF 23.09 FEET; 86) THENCE N.89 °50'31 "E., A DISTANCE OF 17.66 FEET; 87) THENCE N.41 °47'11 "E., A DISTANCE OF 22.78 FEET; 88) THENCE N.61 005'12 "E., A DISTANCE OF 20.73 FEET; 89) THENCE S.88 °07'51 "E., A DISTANCE OF 9.90 FEET; 90) THENCE N.78 °03'45 "E.,' A DISTANCE OF 22.86 FEET; 91) THENCE S.67 043'09 "E., A DISTANCE OF 31.31 FEET; 92) THENCE S.73 054'18 "E., A DISTANCE OF 14.52 FEET; 93) THENCE S.58 03926 "E., A DISTANCE OF 17.37 FEET; 94) THENCE S.49 °59'03 "E., A DISTANCE OF 12.70 FEET; 95)l ENCE S.19 °05'48 "E., A DISTANCE OF 17.45 FEET; 96) THENCE S.56 °25'36 "E., A DISTANCE OF 22.37 FEET; 97) THENCE S.89 °13'14 "E., A DISTANCE OF 27.00 FEET; 98) THENCE N.65 °07'37 "E., A DISTANCE OF 20.16 FEET; 99) THENCE N.44 °54'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 11.50 FEET; THENCE S.73 001'42 "E., LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, A DISTANCE OF 345.51 FEET; THENCE S.45 014'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 195.23 FEET; THENCE N.44 °49'41 "E., A•DISTANCE OF 29.35 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 470131811, A CHORD BEARING OF S.87 058'04 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 56.08 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 57.70 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.4500913 5"E., A DISTANCE OF 74.52 FEET; THENCE N.44 049'41 "E., A DISTANCE OF 200.55 FEET; THENCE N.66 °1 8'04 "E., A DISTANCE OF 12.65 FEET; THENCE N.70 040'19 "E., A DISTANCE OF 117.14 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 159.24 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23 033'22 ", A CHORD BEARING OF N.58 04827 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 65.01 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 65.47 FEET TO THE END OF 3 OF 5 pgge -l-Lar-212 SAID CURVE; THENCE N.38 01326 "E., A DISTANCE OF 0.64 FEET; THENCE S.69 °00'35 "E., A DISTANCE OF 121.69 FEET; THENCE N.81 006125 "E., A DISTANCE OF 91.44 FEET TO A POINT ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 79.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 93 °49'47 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.20 018'22 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 115.39 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 129.37 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49 016'46 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.01 058'09 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 20.85 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 21.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 230.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 103 °37'01 ",'A CHORD BEARING OF S.29 °08'17 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 361.54 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 415.95 FEET TO THE POINT OF REVERSE CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 106 °06'27 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.27 053'33 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 191.81 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 222.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 170.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 85 °31'55 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.67 055'37 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 230.86 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 25* 3.78 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE, THENCE N.69 °18125 "W., A DISTANCE OF 226.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30 02814111, A CHORD BEARING OF N.84 03246 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 210.28 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 212.78 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH, A DISTANCE OF 81.68 FEET; THENCE N.01 °45'52 "W., A DISTANCE OF 11.24 FEET; THENCE S.89 059'22 "W., A DISTANCE OF 103.96 FEET; THENCE N.46 032'37 "W., A DISTANCE OF 45.64 FEET; THENCE N.14 °48'41 "W., A DISTANCE OF 10.91 FEET; THENCE N.45 °14'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 162.98 FEET; THENCE S.89 146'00 "W,, A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET, THENCE S.44 046'00 "W., ADISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE S.89 046'00 4W., ADISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °4840 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.80 021'40 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 74.80 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 022'40 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.44 046'00 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 66. U3 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 68.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO TM LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 048'40 "21 A CHORD BEARING OF S.09 01920 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET;. THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.00 014'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET; THENCE S.44 146100 "W., A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE S.00 014100 "E., A DISTANCE OF 64.82 FEET; THENCE S.44 046'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 56.97 FEET; Melm Page_s_„ar_JiC THENCE S.20 012'10 "W., A DISTANCE-Of 25.12 FEET; THENCE S.00 014'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 66.80 FEET; THENCE 5.89 °46'00 "W., A DISTANCE OF 68.02 FEET; THENCE S.44046'00 'W, A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE S.000 14'00"E,, A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET, THENCE S,44 046100 "W., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 048'40 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S,35 021'40 "W. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 74.80 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 022'40 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.00 014100 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 66.03 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 68.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °48'40 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.35 049'40 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 29.77 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 29.91 FEET TO TIM POINT OF TANGENCY OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.45 °100 11E., A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET; THENCE S.00 °14'00 "E., A.DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE S.45 014'00 "E., ADISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE N.89 °46'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 114.76 FEET; THENCE S.00 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 48.33 FEET; THENCE N.89 °46'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET; THENCE S.00 °14'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET, THENCE N.89 046'00 "E., A DISTANCE OF 18.95 FEET; THENCE S.50 °3443 "W., A DISTANCE OF 20.17 FEET; THENCE S.45 007'40 "W., A DISTANCE OF 124.95 FEET- THENCE S.00 °07'40 "W., A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE S.44'52'20 "E., A D" ISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE S.00 °07'40 "We, A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 87.76 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 30 003'42 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.14 °54'11 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 45.52 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 46.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING: A RADIUS OF 71.25 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34 057'52 ", A CHORD BEARING OF S.47 024'58 "E. AND A CHORD LENGTH OF 42.81 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, AN ARC LENGTH OF 43.48 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE S.00 007'40 "W., A DISTANCE OF 44.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 23.88 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS REEFER TO AN ASSUMED BEARING OF X.89 °52120 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THIS PROP IS S CT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. (\ - 08/16/2000 STEPHEN E. BERRY, STATE FL-0 A (L. S. #5296) BBLS SURVEYORS & MAPPERS (L.B. #6753) 9994CEI.LWY PROOFED 08/15/2000 3EB (SEE ATTACHED SKETCH- 9984LS) 5OF5 Page WATER TURXEYHAY LEGEND P.O.B. Pawl OF Kowmo P.Ola PMT OF 0OME1N EMENT SEC. SECTIGN TNP, TO"ww "M RANGE O.R A£C N YBB ORD NO.' SOFT. ER SOUAK FEET NGVO NAXNAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM aNaTE • ' n Q _ W06WS PA13 LANOUICS U4T NO. 1 AS ktdDR O M'PLAT BOOR Tp, PACi; N, . AND w001N5 PASS.L40W=, U;4T T 1 AWITPV AS RECDROlD N PUT sOtllf ' Ti 10.' PAR h; ALL OF THE MAX IEWICS OF, COULR CMAN , /LCIROA AS , MI AS RLGT06 AND EASOAMT5 AS]COATED VIN SAC RLAIS TIAK Kd ' VACS Sn PORAIA/TT TO A RE5aJ1T1011 OF WE bO.1RO Od COLKN t1MM1R59E►1M y 1K7MUTM PM WS! AS RECgRO[D w OJT. 24m Pi(X•ng7 -'M,. Cv'TNF NURUC REcoRDS- a, COUEII COUNTY. FL9Ru L E11RPT TCR, UIE 1ESTEILLY 77O FEET (SMTEREfAY).OE RICANS PASS LAND* S LNT N0. 1. . w a , W W I W. tu W. H I U) N I wN D E S 0' 60' 120' ISO' c140' SCALE, 1' = 12D' (THIS SKETCH MAY HAVE BEEN REBUCEB) 7 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY GENERAL NOTES 1) BEARINGS REFER TO AN ASAIMM BTARINO OF N.B9S2'20 -* ALONG THE SOUTH L OF THE SOUTHEAST WARIER OF SEG7ION 20. IQWR5KP 45 SWTII RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY FLOMDA, 2) DIMENSONS SHORN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND OECIMALS THEREOF. 3) THS PROPERTY 13 SUBJECT 70 EASEMENTS RCSEMATIONS. OR RES7IRCTIONS OF RECOM. 4) SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR LINE AND CURVE THOLE P.O.d ' CONSERvn6m 'N-2c' 47� htNTH RIGHT -ffK-VAY L1UVE EASMAW ' • •1X40.23! 51FT. BE COM M31 XES7ERLY 260 PELT , (90' RIGHT -bF -WAY) BEARING BASIS RIGHT Dr- OFATER►A1) I N 99'52'20' V 1316 81' WIGGINS PASS LANDINGS UNIT N0. E. (PUT DOOR 30. PAGE 44.) - 250' '� RID IDUrm 4CAN • . ;� . • • . INT PR R3. {AL • K.04 w a , W W I W. tu W. H I U) N I wN D E S 0' 60' 120' ISO' c140' SCALE, 1' = 12D' (THIS SKETCH MAY HAVE BEEN REBUCEB) 7 THIS IS NOT A SURVEY GENERAL NOTES 1) BEARINGS REFER TO AN ASAIMM BTARINO OF N.B9S2'20 -* ALONG THE SOUTH L OF THE SOUTHEAST WARIER OF SEG7ION 20. IQWR5KP 45 SWTII RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY FLOMDA, 2) DIMENSONS SHORN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND OECIMALS THEREOF. 3) THS PROPERTY 13 SUBJECT 70 EASEMENTS RCSEMATIONS. OR RES7IRCTIONS OF RECOM. 4) SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR LINE AND CURVE THOLE P.O.d SHEETIOF3 KETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8BLS SURVEYORS & MAPPERS /NG CONSERVATION EASEMENT 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. s` (ALLOWING PASSIVE RECREATIONAL USE) k SECTION 2000L�lERHCOUNTY, FLOT RIDAGE 25 EAST /(,�pLES, FLORIDA 31110 (941J 597 -1315 Page _:I_ of �Z. --------- 'N-2c' 47� htNTH RIGHT -ffK-VAY L1UVE r. = BE COM M31 DL VE •••I SIC R L, (90' RIGHT -bF -WAY) BEARING BASIS RIGHT Dr- ""a L' E- I N 99'52'20' V 1316 81' SOUTH LINE OF SEC. 20, TVA 48 S., RNCA 25 C. SHEETIOF3 KETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8BLS SURVEYORS & MAPPERS /NG CONSERVATION EASEMENT 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. s` (ALLOWING PASSIVE RECREATIONAL USE) k SECTION 2000L�lERHCOUNTY, FLOT RIDAGE 25 EAST /(,�pLES, FLORIDA 31110 (941J 597 -1315 Page _:I_ of �Z. a� pa r3ve n gg! Z�^cciOA ��yppy pp9 y�l u ^ R� n r r nNN C "�i LT�i ubur ��$o Ox Q 0 Q SEESHfET1,QFt: !AATCRLM • SEE SMEET2 pF2 , v +� (jW RIDNT -DID' -WAY) Z ti b y n m � o cn z � 0 Sao z m bo THIS IS NOT A SURVEY a SHEET 2 OF 3 4 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION BBLS SURVEYORS 6 MAPPERS 1NG, CQNSERVA770N EASF_MENT 1502 A RAIL HEAD BLVD. (ALLOWING PASSIVE RECREA77ONAL USE) SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA 34710 (541) 597 -1315 COLLIEA COUNTY FL1�R10A Page o1 ARsr�A X�F"L NA2'12vo,w.. 863722 (X) +� (jW RIDNT -DID' -WAY) Z ti b y n m � o cn z � 0 Sao z m bo THIS IS NOT A SURVEY a SHEET 2 OF 3 4 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION BBLS SURVEYORS 6 MAPPERS 1NG, CQNSERVA770N EASF_MENT 1502 A RAIL HEAD BLVD. (ALLOWING PASSIVE RECREA77ONAL USE) SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA 34710 (541) 597 -1315 COLLIEA COUNTY FL1�R10A Page o1 CURVE TABLE 04RVC RADII.S Dn IA . ARC 7AWN7 C167PD Cli#1D ACARIMO L INE TA BL E 7400' 47.1378' 5770' 3460' 56X8' "7.58'04T CL !39.21. 22•3J?d' 63471 3220' 6501' N38.48'27T C3 L lA[ JCARJAG DIS7AAA;F 2'500' 49.1646' 01.50' 11,47' 2413' SOl•50V9f C5 030.00' 103.37'07' 41595' 4.19837' 361.54' 529'08'17 £' C6 LJ 4.2 AM- 14V0•V NJ4.36'73T .1.91' 17.56' L47 N87•J2V4'v 1573' L93 558.3926'[ l7ar C] N•M'S5'!0'C 1756' L48 449 S8&'45'S0'V 19,70• L94 S71•NYBT 14,sr L4 A07.40'JD•C .7469, L30 N46.08'47V N3344 [!•V 14,97' L95 S6r•0JVlT' 34.31' LS 4.6 NIS'211f7 20X9' 4.51 ApOV324T 22.49, 19.02' L!6 N7803"43T 20.86' G7 At22.27Y0'C N26.28'N'E I.37' 45.08' 432 NO'1.32'S2'V 1SO4' 4.97 L90 AKS'07"J7E ser'13%4T 2016' L7 N78'I104T 45", L33 L54 A¢4.04149'V N17•l7']1'V 14 .#7' L!! S56.2S76T r7tl0• 2&J7• L 9 LIO Nr5'30V7'C 575' 9Iu •[ 63,12' 6aie, L55 N40 Z2.091V lRBI' 7,41• L100 4.101 N44.34WT 'f 11.30' Lil A!2!'.76'J5'C 13.33' 4.56 L57 N79'S773'V rr2r LJ02 N44'49'4) SIS'0l;7J'£ Pgm' Nat' 072 NI7ro7'79'C ,70,33• L38 NiJ'4t04•V NIP-14,13,6, 27.!7' 410] N66•18174•£ Max L73 N1 7'34154161 3219 L39 AD04193'•V 3548' L104 N70'f0 ;19'C 11711• Llf LJS M4.47W-V W47l78•v 40.76' 22.31' 4.60 AV9'0l37v 2888• 24..16' L10S L /Od S69V0:15T A6l'064:3'f 12.69' 416 KJ'17127'V 18.07' 4.67 162 A06%9'2YE M7•S9 %!'E 28�• LI07 AvoroOtq'C 914I' 81.68• L17 tl8 N733434-61 NrY30'Sg'V J6.B >' 26.62' 4.67 32.14' 229, L100 1109 WJ'IS"52'V 1724' 4!9 N42'l/44T 26.82• L64 Ml5'49.36'V 2587' U7J0 5897919,'✓ N46'T4"St7'V 10196' 4164' 4.20 N50V830'V 24.491 1.65 L67 W4*40V5'r 27.35• Lill •b74'4rfl'V 1891' L2/ S8!•279,3•V 2724' L67 AOS7f42'E 24.09' 4.112 $89'46•[6•✓ 6718' L2P N08"S4'42'E 1551' L69 NJ6.5014 V PS.v, 4113 S44'46'L8'V L23 Atq'09'27T 4495' 4.69 AY12'S8.17T W'50'47T 20.99, LJ5 S40114v V =49, 5049• 4.24 4.25 NJ30536'C 113948067 24.28' Me, 070 NOP'49107E 1028' 2920' 1113 L116 S00J4'00T S44.46V0'V 64,82• 126 S5445'21'E 1206' 4.71 C70 N'07']7;7tT 26.47' L117 SWIPAi•E 1649, 3R4y' 1.27 Sf4J7'21•£ 19.29, 4.73 AGf 0101321E JL80, 4.118 400• /4vA?T 66,80' 428 S55.75'32'C 3567' L74 M71YB J9•C N14•1J01'V 2478 Lll9 S20%9,1[t•V 2512' L29 LX SIS•18'28•V 2217• L75 1413.4773'✓ 2399' P61?' LIM S44'4600'V 56.97' 4.31 533'28'32'✓ Kay 176 AWV"4'£ 1808' LJ21 S44.46V1?'tr 6118' L32 520'49,377 578.3722£ 30.10' 28.09' 077 A07.507YV 27.50' L122 LI23 58946V0•V S00%4 IT 68.02' 417 N54 /9'45'£ 26.39' 26.39, L78 L79 A00Y06.001E NO3'4871T 2&51' LAN S4414ilt7•V 16.43• 3449' LN L33 AOY25'7f'V Lao AAW13139T 28.62' 74X31 Lin S43'J4VLrE 5049 435 N12.5573'C AP2.17'1J'V 16.98' 1560• L61 MrJ974'V 1720' 026 Utz 545% Ulf S00'1400T fair L37 M3'5Y00•V 20,05• 482 L07 588107511E A90' 4.128 4fSro)'10 "v 16.43' 124.93' L36 L39 IA70.71.20'C 2203' C84 AK1'057P'C Nfl•47%17 2R731 02.78' LJ29 SSO'3r47"V 2017• L40 At76'2400'E N16•1"'V 2353• 21.84• L N8!'S0 J1T 1766' 4.130 L7.3f AW7'46VOT J293' 441 A.70.2425'V 2874' L L887 7 N50.369fT 2109, L132 •500.11087 N89•K00 "C 20.00• 3,00' Loa N2599f1'V 2437 4.08 A08'1]'38t 104 VC2M 2015' L131? SR9'46%V- 4239, 4.43 4.14 N16%748'V NJ346')12 2[7.58• J9.0T 4.8! A03'093!'V 21.98' 2135' L134 L1J3 AB94600'F SO8.O7'4C'V Il[li' (05 N3972421V 1949' Ls7 49/ A07.47'Wr 2129' L136 S44.5t'20T 3449' 16,43' L 4 N45'OI l7'V 2141' 4.92 519'0548'[ 549.39037 1713' L1J7 SVOYr10"V 63.18' 12.70' LJJB S00ro7.10"V IL69' LJ]9 /A7oor4vr YAW L14V N7073'26T 464• CURVE TABLE 04RVC RADII.S Dn IA . ARC 7AWN7 C167PD Cli#1D ACARIMO Cl 7400' 47.1378' 5770' 3460' 56X8' "7.58'04T CL !39.21. 22•3J?d' 63471 3220' 6501' N38.48'27T C3 7900' 93.4947 J29.77' 84,46' 11539 S2078'22'V C4 2'500' 49.1646' 01.50' 11,47' 2413' SOl•50V9f C5 030.00' 103.37'07' 41595' 4.19837' 361.54' 529'08'17 £' C6 120110' J06-06".7- 2P223' 159.56' 191.01' S27.3337Z' C7 17000' 85.3135' 253781 157Z3' t3486' S67.5337•v C8 40400' 30.2841' 212.78' 10297 21028' 16#•32'46'✓ C9 9J.09, 1814#40' LA91' 15,09' 2A)7' S09.702016, CIO 74.80.30.2240' 68.18' 3479 6603• S44'I6V0'V C11 91X910.4840' 29.91' IUV' 29.77' 5807/40'✓ Cl2 74,00' 50.22'40• 6&38' 3479 66X3' 500 %400'£ CJ3 91.09 10.48'40' 29.91' 1509• tl.7r 575.2140'✓ C14 9J.09' 18'4840' 0991' 1509 09,77• r35'4r4*'r C15 8776' 30V342' 46X5 23,57 4551!' S14.54'11T C16 71.25' 34.57'32' 4140' 22.44' 4&811 S47.24'58'E TMS 1S NOT A SURVEY SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION SHEET 3 C;F3 �89LS YOFIS MAPPERSlNQ CONSERVATION, EASEMENT 5 02-ARAIL HEAD BLVO. :IDA : SEC17ON 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST 1 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA FLO NAPL 34110 (841) 507 -1315 CA OI SURVEYORS & MAPPERS INC. 1502 -A RAILHEAD BLVD. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 TELEPHONE: 239 - 597 -1315 FAX: (239) 5975207 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONS + RVATION EASEMENT THE DUNES A PORTION OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE RUN N.02 112100 "W., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER FOR A DISTANCE OF 2,637.22 FEET; THENCE.RUN S.87 048'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE S.87 048'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.77 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 014'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 174.92 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046100 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.84 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.03 014'48 "W., A DISTANCE OF 73.52 FEET; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.52 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 °53'38 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 32.95 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.80 °17'59 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 118.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 °55'16 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 14.27 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.63 053'32 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 67.02 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31019'48", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 36.19 FEET AT A 13BARING OF S.44 046'00 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 90.83 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 020'05 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 46.00 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.14 °26'03 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 46.50 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.00 114'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.67 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.00 014'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.45 °14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 146.12 FEET; THENCE RUN S.00 °14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.13 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 1146'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.10 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44'46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.84 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.03 014'48 "W., A DISTANCE OF 73.52 FEET; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.52 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 053'38 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 32.95 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.80 017'59 "W . =of SHEET 1 OF 13 FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.23 O THE POIN OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 118.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 °55'16 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 14.27 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.63 053'32 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 67.02 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31 °19'48 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 36.19 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.44 046'00 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 90.83 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 °20'06 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 46.00 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.14 °26'03 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 46.50 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.00 014100 11E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.67 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.00'1 4'0011E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.69 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 °14'00" W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 125.21 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046'00 "W FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FORA DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.84 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, OF WHICH THE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.03 014'48 "W., A DISTANCE OF 73.52 FEET; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 73.52 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25 °5338 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 32.95 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.80 °17'59 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 118.23 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 °55'16", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 14.27 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.63 °53'32 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.28 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 67.02 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 31-19148 11, SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 36.19 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.44 046100 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 90.83 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 020'06 ", SUBTENDED BY 'A CHORD OF 46.00 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.14 °26'03 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 46.50 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.00 114100 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.67 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046100 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.00 014'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.45 014100 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 60.76 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 74.91 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 °14100 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 65.26 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH; THENCE RUN WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °48140", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 29.77 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.80 021'40 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 74.80 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52 °2214011, SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 66.03 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.44 046'00 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 68.38 FEET TO THE POINT OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 91.09 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 18 °48'40 ", SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 29.77 FEET AT A BEARING OF S.09 010'20 "W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.91 FEFVaae u of Z• SHEET 2 OF 13 IAMI TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN S.000 14100"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.49 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 046'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.43 FEET; THENCE RUN S.00 014'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.18 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 001'42 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 345.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF TURKEY BAY, THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: RUN N.53 043'24 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.25 FEET; THENCE RUN N.23 °25128 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 008'23 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.54 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13 °30'01 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.07 FEET; THENCE RUN N. 14048'59"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.06 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17 °04'12 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.46 FEET; THENCE RUN N.28 134'19 "E. FOR A . DISTANCE OF 11.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N.07 007147 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 8.93 FEET; THENCE RUNN.19 °05'51 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.78 FEET; THENCE RUN N.35 038'13 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.61 FEET;. THENCE RUN N.46001'1 8"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.98 FEET; THENCE RUN N.49 °02'53 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N.11 020103 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22.17 FEET; "THENCE RUN N.21 °26'22 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22.09 FEET; THENCE RUN N.57 052'55 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.46 °29'59 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.28 FEET; THENCE RUN N.48 000'36 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N.81053101 "E. FOR A.DISTANCE OF 15.10 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47 °2923 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.94 FEET; THENCE RUN N.54° 14'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.04 FEET; THENCE RUN N.38 °49'53 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.54 027'37 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.59 FEET; THENCE RUN N.44 054'42 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N.37 °5848 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.44 °04'44 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.72 FEET; THENCE RUN N.59 °05'22 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.99 FEET; THENCE RUN S.30 °3329 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.63 TEET; THENCE RUN S.75 029'58 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.21 FEET; THENCE RUN S.86 °56'07 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.10 FEET; THENCE RUN S.30 103'58 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.69 FEET; THENCE RUN S.51 °1 5'17 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.43 149'39 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.83 FEET; THENCE RUN N.41'55'05 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.38 FEET; THENCE RUN N.30 044'09 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.36 FEET; THENCE RUN S.84032'1 5"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.48 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 017'16 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.76 FEET; THENCE RUN N.82 007'03 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.37 027'52 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.72 FEET; THENCE RUN N.52 °04'16 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 9.92' FEET; THENCE RUN N.47 009'29 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.46 FEET; THENCE RUN N.24 001'37 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17 °49'41 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 15.39 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08 033'57 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.13 FEET; THENCE RUN N.52 °46'47 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.13 FEET; THENCE RUN N.60 145123 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.17 FEET; THENCE RUN S.72 036'59 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.83 FEET; THENCE RUN S.87 °59'27 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.72 FEET; THENCE RUN N.67049'1 0"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N.34 048'19 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.78 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02 148'30 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.05 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 °09'25 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.15 FEET; THENCE RUN S.85 055'09 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.49 FEET; THENCE RUN N.26 044'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.70 011150 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.79 018'20 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.28 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 °46'29 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF u3 SHEET 3 OF 13 P� '��"' 26.64 FEET; THENCE RUN N.22 °08'34 "W, FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.36 FEET; THENCE RUN N.20 027'04 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.40 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00 024'47 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22,84 FEET; THENCE RUN S.68 052111 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.79 FEET; THENCE RUN N.79 026118 11E, FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.85 FEET; THENCE RUN N.41°46'1 1"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 054128 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.83 FEET; THENCE RUN N, 10003'08"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.25 FEET; THENCE RUN N.40022'1 4"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.66 FEET; THENCE RUN N.19 °11'23 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.23 FEET; THENCE RUN N.50 059141 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29,55 FEET; THENCE RUN N.16 °38'04 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.78 FEET; THENCE RUN N.12 °47'11 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34,12 FEET; THENCE RUN N.20 013'09 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.02 FEET; THENCE RUN N.26 052'59 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08018'1 8"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.09 °49'20 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.36 FEET; THENCE RUN N.42 °19'09 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.13 FEET; THENCE RUN N.57 050'19 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.57 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 040'24 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.80 FEET: THENCE RUN N.10 °38'51 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.59 FEET; THENCE RUN N. 10'22'36"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.61 FEET; THENCE RUN N. 17"'31116"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.57 FEET; THENCE RUN N.18 °57'44 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.49 FEET; THENCE RUN N.09 °21'34 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.88•FEET; THENCE RUN N.11 028'29 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.23 FEET; THENCE RUN N.03"24'1 7"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.75 FEET; THENCE RUN MOP I5'34 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.79 FEET; THENCE RUN N.60 °13'30 "E-. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.83 FEET; THENCE RUN N.57 °48'31 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 58.41 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45'22'1 9"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 66.95 FEET; THENCE RUN S.41 053'32 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.62 FEET; THENCE RUN S.78 057'53 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.50 FEET; THENCE RUN S.65 016155 "E. FORA DISTANCE OF 48.60 FEET; THENCE RUN S.76 °07'24 "E, FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.42 FEET; THENCE RUN N.82 °20'55 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.10 FEET; THENCE RUN S.66 °26'20 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.14 FEET; THENCE RUN N.77 018'12 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.27 FEET; THENCE RUN S.72 014'30 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.23 FEET; THENCE RUN S.72 013116 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.92 FEET; THENCE RUN S.83 °16'58 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.89 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 146128 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.34 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 144138 11E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.45 030'14 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.47 FEET; THENCE RUN N.71 052'47 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.48 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17 002'46 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.92 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02 °1742 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.88 FEET; THENCE RUN N.43 °47'04 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.77 FEET; THENCE RUN N.15 °06'12 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.91 FEET; THENCE RUN N.26 055'14 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.50 019'41 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.73 FEET; THENCE RUN N.41 °35'46 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13 °56'43 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.08 FEET; THENCE RUN N.30 °06'14 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.89 FEET; THENCE RUN N.51 °55'32 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.20 FEET; THENCE RUN N.34 04944 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.90 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 °18'41 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.77 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00 148'46 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N.27'28'1 0"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.87 FEET; THENCE RUN N.0627'1 0"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.19 FEET; THENCE RUN N.24'37'1 5"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.76 FEET; THENCE RUN N.42 048'37 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.92 FEET; THENCE RUN SHEET 4 OF 13 p Up of,�'z. N.19 029'12 "W. FORA DISTANCE OF 18.19 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 032'20 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.58 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02 °1 1'06 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.95 FEET; THENCE RUN N.12 °54'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 57.96 FEET; THENCE RUN N.04 045132 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.66 FEET; THENCE RUN N.30 001'13 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.78 FEET; THENCE RUN N.59 035'48 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.95 FEET; THENCE RUN N.84 003115 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 56.08 FEET; THENCE RUN S.86 °3426 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.01 FEET; THENCE RUN S.67 °30'47 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.88 FEET; THENCE RUN S.75 °58'32 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.79 FEET; THENCE RUN S.83 °20'33 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.89 FEET; THENCE RUN S.86027'1 8"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.48 FEET; THENCE RUN N.86 100'30 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.15 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 °35'05 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 54.64 FEET; THENCE RUN N.22 059143 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.04 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08003'1 8"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.02 FEET; THENCE RUN N.06 034'08 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.42 FEET; THENCE RUN N. 19019'37"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.90 FEET; THENCE RUN N.11 °24'23 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.36 FEET; THENCE RUN N.28 027'03 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 45.65 FEET, THENCE RUN N.51 °09'09 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.24 FEET; THENCE RUN N.78 °44'02 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22.91 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 005'37 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.42 FEET; THENCE RUN N.69 007'24 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.98 FEET; THENCE RUN S.83 °11'51 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.90 FEET; THENCE RUN N.74 °44'29 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.17 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 °24'58 "E: FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.73 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13 °3.6'29 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.92 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08 038'51 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.46 FEET; THENCE RUN N.71 014'33 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.97 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COUNTY ROAD 901 (VANDERBILT DRIVE), SAID POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "A"; THENCE LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, RUN S.02 012'25 "E. ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,202.28 FEET; THENCE RUN S.02 012'00 "E., ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 292.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 33.43 ACRES, MORE OR LESS IJUV-791 COMMENCE AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "A ", THE SAME BEING A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, THENCE RUN N.0201 2'25"W. ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.30 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, THE SAME BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: RUN N.86 °12'30 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 54.35 FEET; THENCE RUN N.75 °32'42 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.74 FEET; THENCE RUN N.55 °33'14 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 73.96 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 °16'27 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.34 FEET; THENCE RUN N.33 °57'49 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.03 FEET; THENCE RUN N.50 029'17 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.46 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "B ", THENCE LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, RUN N.87 048'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 177.85 FEET TO SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE; THENCE RUN S.02 °12'25 "E. ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGH7psge,-tq-,. Qf" SHEET 5 OF 13 OF WAY LINE, FOR A DISTANCE OF 126.53 FE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 0.38 ACRES, MORE OR LESS COMMENCE AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "B ", THENCE RUN S.87 °48'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.77 FEET TO SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, THE SAME BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: RUN S.3 1'55'04"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.74 FEET; THENCE RUN S.04 °55'25 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 42.56 FEET; THENCE RUN S.25 056'24 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.27 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 015'07 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.90 FEET; THENCE RUN S.57 049'19 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.83 FEET; THENCE RUN S.24 °48'50 "W: FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.25 FEET; THENCE RUN S.17 113'37 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 14.80 FEET; THENCE RUN S.40 °35'11 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.08 FEET; THENCE RUN S.23 026'40 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.38 FEET; THENCE RUN S.61 035'32 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.59 FEET; THENCE RUN S.59 °5123 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.14 FEET; THENCE RUN S.32 °25'29 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.13 FEET; THENCE RUN S.30 °06'18 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.62 FEET; THENCE RUN S.15 °03'39 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.08 FEET; THENCE RUN S.11 °18'16 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.50 FEET; THENCE RUN S.10 °13'44 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.92 FEET; THENCE RUN N.82 °33'14 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13.85 FEET; THENCE RUN N -46 °09153 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.05 FEET; THENCE RUN N.85 °04'58 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.76 °22'29 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.24 FEET; THENCE RUN N.44 °58'05 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.39 FEET; THENCE RUN N.41 017'38 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.10 FEET; THENCE RUN N.58 °35'29 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.29 FEET; THENCE RUN N.62 131'58 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.96 FEET; THENCE RUN N.41 °00'50 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.97 FEET; -THENCE RUN N.01 °44'58 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.89. FEET; THENCE RUN N.23 059'36 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.34 FEET; THENCE RUN N.03 040'12 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.71 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 °07'56 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.84 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02 °44'49 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 19.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.08 046'34 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.41 FEET; THENCE RUN N.18 °52'52 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20.27 FEET; THENCE RUN N.3I "I 1'40 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.22 °46'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.50 FEET; THENCE RUN N.50 104114 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.51 FEET TO A POINT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS POINT "C ", THENCE LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE RIJN N.87 048'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 280.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 1,11 ACRES, MORE OR LESS AND COMMENCE AT THE AFOREMENTIONED POINT "C "; THENCE RUN S.87 048'00 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 179.97 FEET TO SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, THE SAME BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE THE FOLLOWING COURSES: RUN S.27 °34'19 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 8.98 FEET; THENCE RUN S.58 °47'25 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF page" 34.11 FEET; THENCE RUN S.78'05'25 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.89 FE ET; SHEET 6 OF 13 THENCE RUN S.49 052'56 "W. FOR A D CE OF 29.16 FEET; THENCE RUN S.18 013'21 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 48.52 FEET; THENCE RUN S.32 003'07 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.90 FEET; THENCE RUN S.34053'1 6"E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 103.42 FEET; THENCE RUN S.70 °30'41 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.78 FEET; THENCE RUN S.56 044'50 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.21 FEET; THENCE RUN S.42 018'16 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.82 FEET; THENCE RUN S.14 047'17 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.59 FEET; THENCE RUN S.08 011159 11W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 30,54 FEET; THENCE RUN S.34 000'59 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.40 FEET; THENCE RUN S.14 027'37 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.52 FEET; THENCE RUN S.36 04454 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 100.01 FEET; THENCE RUN S.04 059'31 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.76 FEET; THENCE RUN S.15 041'46 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 32,87 FEET; THENCE RUN S.18 °57'41 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 64.40 FEET; THENCE RUN S.22 023'56 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.15 FEET; THENCE RUN S.06028'1 5"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 22.44 FEET; THENCE RUN S.34 023153 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.33 FEET; THENCE RUN S.43052'17W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.97 FEET; THENCE RUN S.3003 1'30"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 73.07 FEET; THENCE RUN S.41 135104 11W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 27.62 FEET; THENCE RUN S,28 003'44 "W, FOR A DISTANCE OF 91.30 FEET; THENCE RUN S.44 005120 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.59 FEET; THENCE RUN S,I1 012'03 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 50.80 FEET; THENCE RUN S.38 029'31 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 43.65 FEET; THENCE RUN N.54 043'53 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.67 FEET; THENCE RUN N.73 °4834 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.46 FEET; THENCE RUN N.59 0'55'22 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.46 FEET; THENCE RUN S.73 °41'07 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.02 FEET; THENCE RUN S.84 °20'32 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.88 FEET; THENCE RUN N.74°23'08 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.52 FEET; THENCE RUN N.61 000'46"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 44.62 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47 °04126 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.22 FEET; THENCE RUN N.58 038'48 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 72.75 FEET; THENCE RUN 14.48 117126 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.41 °51119 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 4.32 FEET; THENCE RUN N.54 052'37 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 63.39 FEET; THENCE RUN N.46 001'38 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.52 FEET; THENCE RUN N.30 023138 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.43 FEET; THENCE RUN N.29 °49'35 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23,75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.51 139'13 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 81.63 FEET; THENCE RUN N.09 °03120 11W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.83 FEET; THENCE RUN N.53018'21 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 61.49 FEET; THENCE RUN N.21045'05 "W, FOR A DISTANCE OF 3 8.23 FEET; THENCE RUN N.49 048'43 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.86 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 °25'58 "W. FORA DISTANCE OF 66.78 FEET; THENCE RUN S.66 °37'12 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.15 FEET; THENCE RUN N.89 113'15 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.23 FEET; THENCE RUN N.48 042'41 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34.94 FEET; THENCE RUN N.57 046'47 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 96.81 FEET; THENCE RUN N.78 035135 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.14 FEET; THENCE RUN N.56 °53'01 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 31.57 FEET; THENCE RUN N.68'09'3 6"W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.39 FEET; THENCE RUN N.80 018'49 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 34,62 FEET; THENCE RUN S.89 007'08 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 23.64 FEET; THENCE RUN N.69 049'42 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.76 FEET; THENCE RUN S.71 °15'50 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.11 FEET; THENCE RUN S.74 °16'02 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 24.71 FEET; THENCE RUN S.84 115'26 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 68.86 FEET; THENCE RUN S.88 °22'21 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.51 FEET; THENCE RUN S.70 026'20 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21,20 FEET; THENCE RUN ,t- S.44 °10'47 "W. FORA DISTANCE OF 25.63 FEET; THENCE RUN S.71 028'18 "W. SHEET 7 OF 13 FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.13 FEET; THENCE RUN S.68 033'33 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 21.34 FEET; THENCE RUN N.82 °25'53 "W, FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.99 FEET; THENCE RUN N.35 °52127 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.58 FEET; THENCE RUN N.25 042'42 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.16 038'09 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.74 FEET; THENCE RUN N.27 °24'57 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.56 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13 °24122 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17 °42'30 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.88 FEET; THENCE RUN N.36 148152 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 40.31 FEET; THENCE RUN N.10 °55'56 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 65.07 FEET; THENCE RUN N.13 044'12 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 51.55 FEET; THENCE RUN N.38 °3T08 "W, FOR A DISTANCE OF 29.55 FEET; THENCE RUN N.62 °36'52 "W. FOR A DISTANCE OF 16.77 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE, RUN N.87 048'00 "E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 1,628.84 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS 20.48 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. TOTAL AREA OF PARCEL DESCRIBED IS 55.40 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANG-E25 EAST AS BEING N.02" 12'00 "W. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD. 05/29/06 STEPHEN E. BE RUY, STATE OF FLORIDA, (L. S. #5296) BBLS SURVEYORS & MAPPERS INC., (L.B. #6753) PROOFED &Y _ '5SP13 . .. 05/27/06 REVISED CON EASE 5 18 06.DOC (SEE ATTACHED SKETCH'S - SHEETS 9 OF 13 THROUGH 13 OF 13) SHEET 8 OF 13 A. L. DOUGHERTY CO., 1NC_, A CORPORATION 610 PAGE 1774-117H) CONSERVATION EASEMENT 55.40f ACRES P.O.C. POINT "C "— (SEE SHEET 12 OF 13) P.O.C. N S SCALE.` I" — 400' 0 200. 400' THIS EXHIBIT HAY HAVE BEEN REDUCCD P,O.C. POINT "B" (SEE SHEET 12 OF 13) SOUTHEA5T CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (SEE SHEET 10 OF 13) -- P.O.B. (SEE SHEET 1 OF 13) — P.O.C. POINT "A (SEE SHEET 1 OF 13) - P.O.B. (SEE SHEET 10 OF 13) N 1v NOTES: LEGEND 1.) BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 RO.B. POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID, Nil P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS B OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. P. B. PLAT BOOK 3,) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS THEREOF. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY a SHEET 9 OF 13 = SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION BBLS SURVEYORS &MAP'S INC. 7; CONSERVATION EASEMENT m A PORTION OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. ed SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST NAPLES, FLOITIDA 34170 (49) 597 -1315 � o o COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PagvAot.Z -?- p A L356 4f48 47' HI `l. E' 1.357 P,O.B. xl L444 L44 .4 6 "1. CV 19 i S8T4Bro0'V �'•I L442 1.445 •P ED Y,.•' L358 SADD' 441 L439 i t L1R M T /P 0 �'. �• L43 410 L359 L43 .'i !i q• L434 ", •ij 1.360 �. 1 �v 1.433 L432 1.4 1.43 25' ' .'i•,� IN P 1.363 . P. O. C. 1408 O h L422 • d,' dD L364 40 1.365 291. �f1 0 L40 ~�i;'•: j SU 1.40 4y .;. r� , •`•' / L37J CURVE TABLE 1.40 Q4 '.� �, L CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD CJAIRD BEARING 1.39 02 ./ 1 CI 73,52' 33,23' 25'53'36' 3a 95' S90'17'69'V i L39 400 L373 C2 118,83' 14,28' 6.5576' L1.2T S63'S3'32'V 1.395 '•,�� C3 67,02' 36,65' 31.19'48' 36,19' S44'46'00'V C4 90.83' .46,50' 29120'06' 46.00' S14.26'O3•v 393 39 CS 73,52' 3323' 25'53'38' 3295' S80.17'S9 "W 391 3 F. �h C6 118.23' 14,28' 6'55'16' 14.27' S63'53'32'v '89 7 b0. C7 67.OP' 36.65' 31119148' 36.19' 544'46'00'1/ 18 9•., co 9483' 46.50' 29120'06• 46,00' S14'26'03'V U C9 73.52' 33P3' 25'53'38' 3495' S90.17159'V 380 CIO 118.231 14.28' 6.55'16• J4.27' $63.53132'V Cll 67.02' 36.65' 31'19'40' 36)9' S44.46'00•V /C12 90.83' 46.50' 29'410'06' 46.00' SJ4'26'O3'V L382 CJ3 91,09' 29.91' JB'48'40' 29.77' TOO'21'4V'V 04 74.80' 68,38' 52'2240' 66.D3' T44.46.00 -V C15 91.09' 2R91' 18'48'40' 29.77' SO9.10801V LINE TABLE L a LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE L409 N59.05122'E 2199 L426 .BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH L 410 S30.33'84'E 11.63 L427 MR- 33'57'W 11,13 L443 NOV '24'47E 22.84 1411 S75.29'S8•E 20.21 L428 N52'46471v 12,13 L444 S68.5211IF 31.79 L412 S86'56'07'E JZJO L429 N60'45'23'W 1737 L445 N79'2618'E 32.85 2 L 413 S30.031581E 23.69 L430 S 1361591 12183 L446 N4J'4611J'E 20.32 L4J4 S311517'E 29.32 1.431 S97'59'27'V 14.72 L447 N45'54'28'V 2383 L415 H43'49'39'E J9.63 L432 H67'49'10'V 13.86 1.448 N10'O3'OB E 26.25 L4J6 N4J'4F5'D5'E 14,38 L433 N34.48'19'V 11.78 L449 N40.22'14'V 23166 L4J7 N30441091E 26.36 NO2.48'30'£ 2083 L 450 N19.11123E 27.23 L 434 LI1B 504132151E 20,48 1.436 M]4.09'25'E 32,15 L4.71 N50.59'41E 29.55 e L419 Se9.1716'E 11.76 585.55'09'1/ 5549 1.452 N16'38'04 E 2X78 L437 N26.4400'E 2701 L453 NI2'47'11'V 34.12 L400 N82.07'53'E 13,16 L438 $ 1,421 837.27.52'W 16.72 N70.11'SO'E 29.27 1.451 N20.13'09'£ 18,02 m L 422 N52.04'16'V 9,92 L439 N79'18'20'£ 24.28 L455 N26.5259E 2501 1.423 N47.09'29'V 1.92 1440 NO4.46'29'E 26.64 L456 N08'J8'J8'V 2727 L424 W4 *01'37'V 28.01 L441 N28'08'34'V 15.36 1.457 110949'20'1/ 18136 L425 N17'4941'V 15.39 L442 N20'27'04'W 2440 L458 N4219'D9'W 25.13 LEGEND 1.459 N57.50'19'61 48.57 P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING CONSERVATION EASEMENT MOTES: P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 55.401 ACRES 1.) BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20. P.B. PLAT 900K PGS. PACES 2.) THIS PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS yy 3.) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THIS IS NOT A SURVEY THEREOF. SHEET' 1'0 OF 13 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION BBLS SURVEYORS 8 MAPS INC, N ` CONSERVATION EASEMENT x m 4 A PORTION OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. N a A w8 SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 ( 239) 59 7 -13 15 •ifLO LINE TABLE LTN£ L EAR1 �rN£ TABLE N LINE BEARING LEN GTH LINE BEARING LENGTH L349 S02J2.00'E 292,09 1.369 s444b'OO'W 16.43 L389 NJ 7'04'IL E 13.46. e 4 L350 S87'48'00'61 40.77 L370 S89.46'00'V 48.84 L390 N28134791E JL65 W E L 35 N45'14'00'V J74,92 L371 TVO'14'OO'E 49.67 L391 N07'07'47'E 8.93 L 352 S89'46'00'V 63.16 L372 944'4600'V 16.43 1.392 N191051S1" 19.78 S L353 S44.46'00'V 16,43 L273 S00.14'00'E 6318 L393 N35'38'J3'E 19,61 1.354 S8946'00'V 48.84 L374 S4514'00'E 60.76 L394 N46'OJJ8'E 12.98 SCALE 1' 200' L335 S00.14'00'E 49.67 L375 S44'46'00'61 74.91 L395 N49.025.7 E 18.62 L356 S44.46'00'V 16.13 L376 N45.14'00'6? 6526 L396 N11'80'O3'E 22.17 0 100' 200' L 357 S00.14'O0'C 63,18 1.377 SB946.00W 6318 L397 N21.26122'E 22109 THIS EXHIBIT MAY L358 S45.14ro0'E 146.12 L378 S44'46'00'V 16.43 L399 N571521551E 16197 HAVE BEEN REDUCED L359 SOOJ41001E 23)3 L379 S8946'00'V 50.49 L,999 N462959E 8528 L360 S89'46'00'V J6,10 L3&0 S00'14'00'E 50.49 L400 N48.00'36'E 10.62 L361 S4446'00'v 16.43 1.301 S44.461001V 16.43 L401 N61 '53'01'F 15,10 L362 S89.46'00'V 48.84 L3172 S00114100E 63,18 L402 N47'2923'E 29.94 L363 S0014 '00'E 49,67 L393 N73'0J'42'W 34551 L403 N54.14'00'E 12.04 L364 544'46100'V 16.43 L384 N53'4324'V 2025 L404 N38.49'53'E 18.32 1.365 700-14'00-E. 33.69 L385 N23'25'28'V 12,65 L405 N54'27'37'E 2459 L366 S44'46'00'V 47.97 1.386 W4'08P3'V 17.54 L406 N44'5442'E 26.62 L367 N45.14'00'V 12521 L387 N131301011W 17.07 L407 N37'5848E 20,53 L368 SB94600'V 63,18 L366 N14'4859'V X 06 1,406 04 N44 *04'4 81,72 T 1% OF 1 /SSEEEESHE A L! /1.455 L454 1.451 1.450 L355 J p A L356 4f48 47' HI `l. E' 1.357 P,O.B. xl L444 L44 .4 6 "1. CV 19 i S8T4Bro0'V �'•I L442 1.445 •P ED Y,.•' L358 SADD' 441 L439 i t L1R M T /P 0 �'. �• L43 410 L359 L43 .'i !i q• L434 ", •ij 1.360 �. 1 �v 1.433 L432 1.4 1.43 25' ' .'i•,� IN P 1.363 . P. O. C. 1408 O h L422 • d,' dD L364 40 1.365 291. �f1 0 L40 ~�i;'•: j SU 1.40 4y .;. r� , •`•' / L37J CURVE TABLE 1.40 Q4 '.� �, L CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD CJAIRD BEARING 1.39 02 ./ 1 CI 73,52' 33,23' 25'53'36' 3a 95' S90'17'69'V i L39 400 L373 C2 118,83' 14,28' 6.5576' L1.2T S63'S3'32'V 1.395 '•,�� C3 67,02' 36,65' 31.19'48' 36,19' S44'46'00'V C4 90.83' .46,50' 29120'06' 46.00' S14.26'O3•v 393 39 CS 73,52' 3323' 25'53'38' 3295' S80.17'S9 "W 391 3 F. �h C6 118.23' 14,28' 6'55'16' 14.27' S63'53'32'v '89 7 b0. C7 67.OP' 36.65' 31119148' 36.19' 544'46'00'1/ 18 9•., co 9483' 46.50' 29120'06• 46,00' S14'26'03'V U C9 73.52' 33P3' 25'53'38' 3495' S90.17159'V 380 CIO 118.231 14.28' 6.55'16• J4.27' $63.53132'V Cll 67.02' 36.65' 31'19'40' 36)9' S44.46'00•V /C12 90.83' 46.50' 29'410'06' 46.00' SJ4'26'O3'V L382 CJ3 91,09' 29.91' JB'48'40' 29.77' TOO'21'4V'V 04 74.80' 68,38' 52'2240' 66.D3' T44.46.00 -V C15 91.09' 2R91' 18'48'40' 29.77' SO9.10801V LINE TABLE L a LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE LINE TABLE LINE TABLE L409 N59.05122'E 2199 L426 .BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH L 410 S30.33'84'E 11.63 L427 MR- 33'57'W 11,13 L443 NOV '24'47E 22.84 1411 S75.29'S8•E 20.21 L428 N52'46471v 12,13 L444 S68.5211IF 31.79 L412 S86'56'07'E JZJO L429 N60'45'23'W 1737 L445 N79'2618'E 32.85 2 L 413 S30.031581E 23.69 L430 S 1361591 12183 L446 N4J'4611J'E 20.32 L4J4 S311517'E 29.32 1.431 S97'59'27'V 14.72 L447 N45'54'28'V 2383 L415 H43'49'39'E J9.63 L432 H67'49'10'V 13.86 1.448 N10'O3'OB E 26.25 L4J6 N4J'4F5'D5'E 14,38 L433 N34.48'19'V 11.78 L449 N40.22'14'V 23166 L4J7 N30441091E 26.36 NO2.48'30'£ 2083 L 450 N19.11123E 27.23 L 434 LI1B 504132151E 20,48 1.436 M]4.09'25'E 32,15 L4.71 N50.59'41E 29.55 e L419 Se9.1716'E 11.76 585.55'09'1/ 5549 1.452 N16'38'04 E 2X78 L437 N26.4400'E 2701 L453 NI2'47'11'V 34.12 L400 N82.07'53'E 13,16 L438 $ 1,421 837.27.52'W 16.72 N70.11'SO'E 29.27 1.451 N20.13'09'£ 18,02 m L 422 N52.04'16'V 9,92 L439 N79'18'20'£ 24.28 L455 N26.5259E 2501 1.423 N47.09'29'V 1.92 1440 NO4.46'29'E 26.64 L456 N08'J8'J8'V 2727 L424 W4 *01'37'V 28.01 L441 N28'08'34'V 15.36 1.457 110949'20'1/ 18136 L425 N17'4941'V 15.39 L442 N20'27'04'W 2440 L458 N4219'D9'W 25.13 LEGEND 1.459 N57.50'19'61 48.57 P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING CONSERVATION EASEMENT MOTES: P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 55.401 ACRES 1.) BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20. P.B. PLAT 900K PGS. PACES 2.) THIS PROPERTY 15 SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS yy 3.) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THIS IS NOT A SURVEY THEREOF. SHEET' 1'0 OF 13 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION BBLS SURVEYORS 8 MAPS INC, N ` CONSERVATION EASEMENT x m 4 A PORTION OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. N a A w8 SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 ( 239) 59 7 -13 15 •ifLO LINE 4348 L460 L 46J 1.462 L463 L 454 L465 L466 L467 L460 L469 L470 L 474 L472 L473 LINE TABLE LINE LINE TABLE BEARING LENGTH LINE PARING LENGTH LINE HEARING LENGTH SO2'12,25'E 1e02,28 L474 S65'J6'55 £ 48,60 L489 NJ5.06'12'V 1791 N04'40'24'V 24.80 L47$ 576'071-4£ 24,42 L490 N26'55'14'C 21.27 NIO.30'511V 4559 1476 N82'20'S5'E 26.10 L491 N50'J9'4J'E 2373 N10'22'36'£ 31.61 L477 S66.26'20E 19.14 L492 N41'35'46 E 20.32 NJ7'31'16'E 35,57 L478 N77'JOUP'E 2527 L493 N13'5643'E 1 &08 H18'57'44'E 34149 L479 S7P'J4'30'E 3423 L494 N30.06'l4 £ 25.89 N09'2134'8 1-7.08 L420 S72'J3'16'E 1-792 L493 NSI1S51 32'E 3220 Nivae -R9'E 41.23 L461 S83'16'391E 29.89 L496 N34'4944E 26,90 NO3'24'17'V 38,75 L482 S89'4628'C 21,34 L497 N04'J8'41'E 24.77 N06'J5134 £ 49.79 L483 1473'44'38'E 17.75 L498 NDO'48'46'V 27,61' ' N60.131301C 27,83 L464 N45'3074'V 29,47 4199 N27'20'10'C 51.87 N57'48'31'E 58,41 1485 N71'52'47'V 17.40 L500 N06'2710'E 37.19 N45'22'19'F 66.95 L486 N17'0246'V IL32 L501 N24'37'15'C 2476 S4153'32'E 19162 L407 NO2'I7'42'E 1-1188 L502 N42'48'37E 2592 5'70'5753'£ 16.50 L488 M43'47'04'V e5.77 L303 N19'29'12'V 18.19 c�C ourrr. N W+LI e S SCALE:: V = 200' 0 100' 200' THIS EXHIBIT MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED P.O.C. 'OINT "A" EE SHEET 12 OF 13) LEGEND SEE SHELr 10'GF 1:3" 77' "",l P.O.E. POINT OF BEGINNING _NOTES: P.O.G. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 1.) BEARINGS REFER To THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST P, B. PLAT BOOK BUARTER OF SFCTION 20. 0. R. OFFICIAL RECORDS 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS CONSERVATION EASEMENT OR RESTRICTIONS OF RF,CORO. / 55.403 ACRES 3.) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARF IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SHEET 11 OF 13 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION o BBLS SURVEYORS &MAP'S INC. N } N CONSERVATION EASEMENT A PORTION OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 (299) 597 -1315 < COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA F&ge.ZQ.of j& F PO P. PO x y$ S nnn' GJr w7--nP -WAY) CONSERVATION EASEMENT 55.401 ACRES LINE TABLE LINE LINE TABLE LENGTH L23 LINE TABLE - w LINE REARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH z e n Ll SP7.34791V 8.98 L12 508'111591V 30.54 41SS L2 S581471P51V 34JJ L13 S34'00'59'V 2140 L31 L3 S78'05'25'V ,3.989 LJ4 S14'P7137'V 26.52 S8420'32'V L4 S49152'56'V 29 .)6 L15 s36•i431•w 10601 SCALE: 1' 200' LS S18'1321'V 48.52 U6 $04'59'31'£ 27.76 L39 46 S32'03'07'E 44.90 L17 S15.41'46'E 32.97 N54'52'37'V L7 S54'53'16'E J03.42 Lie S191571411E 64,40 0 100' 200' L8 $70'30'4J'C 34,78 L19 S22.23'S6'E 2545 THIS EXHIBIT MAY L9 S56'44150'E 2,9121 120 S06'2813'V 22144 HAVE BEEN REDUCED UO S42'iBJ6'E 344eP LZI S34'2333•V L-433 1629.84 U1 214.4717'E 36.59 LEE S43'39'17'V 2597 L120 nnn' GJr w7--nP -WAY) CONSERVATION EASEMENT 55.401 ACRES LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGTH L23 130'31'30'V 7307 L24 S41 '35'04'V 27.62 L25 S28'03.44'V 91.30 L26 944'05'20'V 36,59 L27 Sll •!t'03'V 5460 L28 S30'P9'31•V 41SS L29 N54'43'33'V 31,67 L30 N73148'34'W 26,46 L31 N593T22'V 3146 L32 973'41'07'V 35.02 L34 S8420'32'V 29,99 L35 H74'231081V 26.52 L36 N61100'461V 44,62 437 H47'04'26'V 47,22 1.31 N58.36'48'V 72,75 L39 N4877'26'V 21,01 L40 N41'71'191V 4.32 441 N54'52'37'V 6139 L42 N46b1'38'V 31.52 L44 N30't3'38'V 38.43 L45 A't9.49'35'V 2175 L46 NS41391J31V 9163 L47 W9'0320'V 11,83 L49 N53.181211V 6449 L49 N2J'45'05'V 38.23 L50 N49'49143'V 34.86 L82 N0748'00'£ 1629.84 L119 S31.55'04 'V 2J, 74 LIJ9 SO4'55'P5'V 42.56 L120 S25'S6'24161 34.27 1121 S441151071V 2190 L122 S57149'191V 2583 LIP3 R24.48'501V 2B.2S L124 SJ7.131371V 14,80 L125 S40135111 IV 13109 LJ26 S2J'26'40'V 2B,3B LJ27 S61'3J'32'V 47,59 LJ2B S59'S]'P3'V 2014 4129 S32't529'V 1713 U30 S30106118'V 2162 4.131 S15103.391V 2108 1.132 S!!'f8'J6'E' 21.50 LJ33 S10'tY44'V 23.92 L134 N82'33'14•V J3.85 L135 N46.09'53'V 19.05 LJ36 N85'04'5e'V 3227 L137 N7622'29'V 2524 L136 N44'51'OS'V 4339 L139 N4117'39'£ 83,10 L140 N58'3579'£ 29.29 L141 N62'3138-£ 21.96 L14P N41'AT50'E 27,97 4143 N01.44'S0'E 30.89 LJ44 N23'5936'E 21.34 L145 NO3.40'It'C 19,71 L146 N10'07'56'V 2184 L147 hW*44'49'V 1946 L148 N014694'V 16,41 L749 N18'S232'V 20.27 4150 NJI'!1'40'V ld32 LIM N22.46'00'V 26.50 L152 NZV-04.14'V 34,S1 L153 N97.48'00'£ 280.66 L154 N86'J2'30'V 54,37 LISS N75'3242'V 3574 L 156 N55'33'14'V 73,96 L167 NIO'I6E7•V 33.34 LJ51 N33'574 9,61 2813 LJ59 N50'2917'V J4.46 L169 N87-40'00 -I! 177195 L161 502'12'23'£ 126,53 L534 NO2'J2'25'V 44.30 LEGEND NOTES: P-0-B. POINT OF BEGINNING 1.) BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT QUARTER OF SECTION 20. P. a. PLAT BOOK 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD, 3.) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SHEET 12 OF 13 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION 8 m BBLS SURVEYORS h MAPS INC. CONSERVATION EASEMENT' 8 A PORTION OF 1502 -A RAIL HEAD BLVD. SECTION 20 ' TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 (239) 597.1315 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LINE TABLE LINE TABLE w LINE BEARING LENGTH LINE BEARING LENGTH z n L51 S99.25'5B'W 66.78 L68 S71'28'18'V 2913 L52 %6.37'12'V 33.15 L69 S60173133'W 21.34 L53 N89'13'IS'W 38.23 L70 1482.25 53'W 38.99 L54 N48'42'41'V 34.94 L71 N35.5227'W 59158 SCALY+: 1" . 200' L55 N57'46'47'V 96.81 L70 N25'40.42'V 30.97 1,56 N78.35'35'V 31.14 L73 N16.38'091V 3174 0 100, 200' L57 N56`53'O1'W 31.57 L74 NE7'24'57'V 36156 THIS EXHIBIT MAY L50 N68'09'36'W 2339 L75 NJ3'24'20'V 25,75 HAVE BEEN RCOUCED L59 N80•J6'49'V 34.62 L76 N17'42'30'61 59.88 L60 S89.07'08'W 03.64 L77 1436• {850'V 40.31 L61 N69.49140'W 33.76 L78 N101551561V 6507 L62 S71.15'50'V 39.11 L79 N13'44l2'V 5L55 L63 S74'16'02'V 24.71 L00 N38'37'08'61 29.55 L64 SB4.15'26'V 68.06 L61 N62.36.52'V 16,77 L65 S88E2'21'W 52.37 L82 N87'48D0'E 1628.84 L66 570.26 20'V 21.20 L67 744'10'47'61 25.63 A S L L58 l� \ L53 ` L54 � LSS i FIELD LOCATED MEAN HIGH WATER LINE 60. ELEVATION = 1.40' NGVD 1929 a L PROWDED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF . a \ L63 ENWRONUCNTAL PROTEC71ON L64 \ L70 L 7 L 72 K n J a LEGEND P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C, POINT OF COMMENCEMENT NOTES: P.B. PLAT BOOK O.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS 1.) BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 20. CONSERVATION EASEMENT 55.401 n ACRES 2.) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. 3.) DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SHEET 13 OF 13 SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION S o B8L5 SURVEYORS &MAP'S INC, CONSERVATION EASEMENT A PORTION OF 1502•A RAIL HEAD BLVD. N A w o SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST h Q A COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA NAPLES, FLORIDA 34110 (239) 397-1315 .2�i. I April 20, 2009 COLLIERCOUNTYGOWRNMEW pas "and> Comprehensive Planning Department • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104 Mr. Tim Hall Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. 3584 Exchange Avenue, Suite B Naples, FL 34104 -3732 BD- PL2010 -979 REV:1 11495 VANDERBILT DRIVE DATE: 6/1/10 DUE: 6/15/10 RE: Petition CPCD- 2009 -1, Comprehensive Plan Consistency Determination for The Dunes Dodos, located at 11495 Vanderbilt Drive (Parcel 8), Section 20, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Dear Mr, Hall: This letter replaces the previously issued consistency letters, dated February 11 and February 24, 2009, for this project. In your submittal cover letter, you requested a letter be sent to you stating the project identified above has been reviewed and found consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and Manatee Protection Plan. The relevant Elements are the Future Land Use Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Below is staffs analysis. Protect Summer►: Perthe information submitted by the applicant, the proposed project includes the consbuction of docking facilities that will accommodate 10 vessels up to 30 feet in length and 39 vessels up to 35 feet in length for a total of 49 vessels. A. CQg%istancy with the Future Land Use Ebmwnt (FLUE). The subject property is located within the Urban designated area (Urban — Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict) as identified on the countywide Future Land Use Map, and is within the Coastal High Hazard Area- This designation allows residential development and associated accessory uses such as boat docks. Based upon the foregoing, Comprehensive Planning staff is of the opinion that the subject request m,&y be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element. The proposed project may be deemed consistent with certain Goals, Objectives and Policies of the CCME once the Site Development Plan has been amended to require the project's compliance with Objective 2.1; Goal 6 and Objective 6.3; and, Policies 10. 1.4 and 10.3.1, as noted below. Phone (239) 403 -2400 Attachment E www.colliergov,nec Objective Y.1: Relevant Policies under this Objective must be demonstrated at time of SDPA. Goal 6: The project shall not impact the minimum native vegetation requirement for the site (requirement must be noted on the approved SDP for the new docking facilities). OWsctive 6.3 (and Policy 10.3.1): Impacts to Seagrass beds must be minimized. The project must comply with Policy 10.1.4, as follows: New marinas shall conform to the following criteria: Marinas and multi -slits docking facilities shall prepare hurricane plans for approval which describe measures to be taken to minimize damage to marina sites and neighboring properties and the environment; this hurricane plan shall be reviewed and approved by the County. C with the Protection Plan OWecthre 10.1 of the C ME and the Manatee Protection Plan (MPP) were used to review the proposed docks. The a plication identifies less than 5% impact to native marine habitat. The calculation for manatee use rating is Not High. Water depth will be adequate to the nearest marked channel once the proposed dredging is complete. However, no depth readings were provided for adequate depth out to the Gulf (or a five mile radius), so the project qualifies for a moderate rating. This rating allows up to 10 boat slips for every 100 feet of shoreline. Construction of new dry storage facilities and new boat ramps is prohibited. With the submitted Information and current data available, construction of 49 slips is consistent with the Manatee Protection Plan. As stated in the MPP the following information has also been taken under consideration, 3.2.3 Site Specific Recommendations: `3.2.3.1 Wiggins Pass Area: The waters of the Wiggins Pass area are very shallow, on average less than 5 feet at Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). The Army Corps of Engineers designed the Wiggins Pass System for 3400t draft vessels, and current maintenance dredging permits are based on the 3 -foot draft design. All marina or multi -dock facilities should advise their patrons of this potential draft limitation. Provisions should be made for posting the draft limitations on nautical charts, in notices to mariners and possible signs at the pass entrance." During final construction plan (SDP) review, the above findings may change based on information provided at time of submittal. C. Consistency with Local Setback Requirements and Zonina and Bull Codes (Review �ted by Kay Deselem) The subject site is located within The Dunes PUD, with zoning regulations controlled by the Coilier County Land Development Code (LDC) and more specifically the PUD Ordinance, Ordinance No. 2000 -74. The proposed request consists of the construction of docking facilities that will accommodate 10 vessels up to 30 feet in length and 39 vessels up to 33 feet in length for a total of 49 vessels. In Section 3.4.8.2 of the PUD Ordinance, "Boathouses and docks, subject to Section 2.6.21 of the Collier County Land Development Code" is listed as an allowable accessory use. Staff has been advised by the petitioner's agent that no currently approved Site Development Plans (SDPs) for the subject property reflect the boat dock facility configuration/information. Consequently, the existing SDP will need to be amended to reflect the proposed configuration of the boat docking facilities prior to construction. Further, the proposed facilities will need to comply with all Federal, State and Local requirements. Pursuant to the LDC, one Issue that can be problematic for boat docking facilities is the allowable protrusion into . a waterway. If applicable, boat dock extension requests would need to be approved prior to the SDP amendment. The protect cannot be found in compliance with the County's Building Codes until building permit applications are submitted and approved. Such approvals are usually a routine matter once the appropriate construction drawings are submitted and found to meet the requirements of the County's adopted buMing codes. If I may be of further assistance, please call me at (239) 262 -2466. Sinoalrel M' ale R ca, ICP Principal Planner Email: michelemosMO- colliergov net c File CPeD- 2009.1 Kay Deselem, AJCP, Principal Planner, Zoning and Land Development Review Dept. Laura Roy &, Environmental Specialist, Engineering Review and Environmental Services Dept. ti AGENDA ITEM 8 -C Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: MARCH 1, 2012 SUBJECT: VA- PL2010 -2285, LOT 80 PLANTATION ISLAND PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Mr. Robert Beattie 9140 Carribean Boulevard Miami, FL 33157 Agent: Richard L. Wu 2190 Kerry Forest Parkway D4 -164 Tallahassee, FL 32309 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider a site alteration Variance to impact mangroves, pursuant to LDC Subsection 9.04.02.B.1, Variances for Site Alterations within the Plantation Island... Subdivision, to allow up to 2,500 square feet of site alteration/clearing in a mangrove and predevelopment vegetation area to permit a principal structure in the Mobile Home (MH) Zoning District. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject 0.16± acre site is located on Lot 80, Plantation Island, east of Everglades City, at the southwest corner of Plantation Drive and Hawk Lane, in Section 24, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map on the following page.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The applicant is requesting a Variance to permit the construction of an approximately 1,800 square -foot, stilt mobile home. Approximately 3,000 square feet of mangroves exist along the western boundary of the site. In order to erect the prefabricated structure on the site, as depicted in the Plan entitled, "Beattie Residence, Landscape /Clearing Plan" dated October 27, 2011, VA- PL2010 -2285, LOT 80 PLANTATION ISLAND 1 -30 -12 Page 1 of 9 CITY OF-4- [I t� N COWER COUNTY n m 0 a i I Gq *i HENDRY COWER C.R. 846 C.R. 858 1 -75 S.R. 84 N vi u DQ O EVERGLADES /J U p • PROJECT vO COWER c---- LOCATION NONROE COUNTY PLANTA710N PARKWAY A- ACSC /ST RSF -1- ACSC/ST SITE PLANTATION DRIVE LOCATION J � O ~ U 4 O V 3 DD Li OU = O Q LOCATION MAP PETITION # VA -PL- 2010 -2285 T. F- U Z Q U a a ZONING MAP MH(4)- ' ACSC /ST a Beattie Residence, Plantation Islam Naples, Florida. RICHARD LEE WU, ARCHITECT VU 2910 KERRY fOREBi PKWY ARCHITECT TALI. KERB E, R 32309 (239) 216 - 6943 FL CFRT / AR 0H012J83 .l BEATIE RESIDENCE, HAWK LANE, SITE CALCULATIONS PREPAREO FOR: eFAmE SITE IS GENERALY COVERED WITH MANGROVES AND VARIOUS EXOTICS VEGETATION. PROPERTY AREA 5,000 SF I MAXIMUM CLEARING ALLOYED 2 0 SF AREAS TO BE CLEARED, fte.�a�on /155 + BUILDING FOOTPRINT, ISOD SF STAIRS AND PORCHES- 196 SF BWD WALK. 60 SF TOTAL, 2056 SF I RICHARD LEE WU, ARCHITECT VU 2910 KERRY fOREBi PKWY ARCHITECT TALI. KERB E, R 32309 (239) 216 - 6943 FL CFRT / AR 0H012J83 .l BEATIE RESIDENCE, HAWK LANE, NAPLES,FLORIDA PREPAREO FOR: eFAmE LANDSCAPE! CLEARING PLAN I FIRST REVIEW 10 /2] /II fte.�a�on /155 + Oole approximately 1,497 square feet of these mangroves along with predevelopment vegetation totaling 2,056 square feet would need to be removed from the western portion of the property. The subject property is located in an Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) and Special Treatment (ST) area, and is also subject to LDC Section 4.02.14, Design Standards for Development in the ST and ACSGST Districts, and specifically Subsection 4.02.14.C.4, which precludes the destruction or alteration of mangrove trees and salt marsh grasses. However, as noted in LDC Subsection 9.04.02.13.1, an agreement reached in 2005 between the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) and the Department of Community Affairs authorized the use of a Variance process to deviate from this requirement "for site alterations, including dredging and filling, of up to 2,500 square feet, regardless of predevelopment vegetation... within Units One, Two and Three of the Plantation Island Subdivision..." Because the subject property is located within Unit Three of the Plantation Island Subdivision, it is eligible for such a Variance request. There has been one other variance granted within the neighborhood on Lot 77 Otter Avenue to impact 139.4 square feet of mangroves. SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: undeveloped with a Mobile Home (MH)zoning designation in an Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) and Special Treatment (ST) area East: undeveloped with a Mobile Home (MH)zoning designation in an Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) and Special Treatment (ST) area South: undeveloped with a Mobile Home (MH)zoning designation in an Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) and Special Treatment (ST) area West: undeveloped with a Mobile Home (MH)zoning designation in an Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) and Special Treatment (ST) area VA- PL2010 -2285, LOT 80 PLANTATION ISLAND 1 -30 -12 Page 4 of 9 AERIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): As noted, the subject property is located in Plantation Island, which is designated as Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but focuses on the larger issue of the actual use. As residential uses are an authorized use in this land use designation, the proposed mobile home use on the site is consistent with the Subdistrict and, therefore, deemed to be consistent with the GMP. ANALYSIS: Section 9.04.03 of the Land Development Code gives the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) the authority to grant Variances. The Planning Commission is advisory to the BZA and utilizes the provisions of Section 9.04.03 A. through H. (in bold font below), as general guidelines to assist in making their recommendation of approval or denial. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: VA- PL2010 -2285, LOT 80 PLANTATION ISLAND 1 -30 -12 Page 5 of 9 a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes. The subject property is located in a platted mobile home subdivision in Plantation Island, which is an area characterized by mangrove forests. As previously noted, the proposed mobile home is a prefabricated structure, and as such, cannot have its 60 x 30- foot dimensions simply altered as a non - prefabricated home could. Consequently, the applicant is restricted by both the dimensions of his lot and the dimensions of his mobile home unit. Therefore, the applicant is requesting that a portion of the site containing mangroves and other predevelopment vegetation be altered. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre- existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes. Although a plat has never been recorded, according to a Property Appraiser's records, the parcels in the neighborhood were created in 1970. Nevertheless, the creation of the subject parcel, and its purchase by the applicant in 2000, predate the adoption of the County's Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) and Special Treatment (ST) area design standards, which prevent the applicant from removing the 2,056 square -feet of mangrove trees and other predevelopment vegetation necessary to accommodate his mobile home on the site. Therefore, the conditions requiring this Variance request are pre - existing. C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes. A literal interpretation of the applicable LDC provisions would create practical difficulty for the applicant by preventing the location of his mobile home on the property. Moreover, no other dwelling type is allowed in the MH Zoning District. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes. The Variance requested would be the minimum to make possible the reasonable use of the mobile home. As previously noted, the proposed location of the structure was carefully planned in order to minimize its impact on the mangroves while still maintaining the necessary front, side and rear yard setbacks that would afford sufficient area for the site's septic system. Furthermore, Subsection 9.04.02.13.1 potentially allows site alterations up to 2,500 square feet, and the applicant is requesting to impact 2,056 square feet of mangrove area, which is within the 2,500 square foot limit. It is staff's opinion that the Variance, if granted, would not adversely impact the standards of health, safety and welfare. VA- PL2010 -2285, LOT 80 PLANTATION ISLAND 1 -30 -12 Page 6 of 9 e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No. A Variance by definition confers some relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. However, Subsection 9.04.02.B.I entitles property owners to request a Variance from the requirement of Subsection 4.02.14.C.4 for site alterations up to 2,500 square feet within Units One, Two and Three of the Plantation Island Subdivision. As such, other properties in the vicinity facing a similar hardship would be conferred the same consideration. Furthermore, approval of the Variances would enable the applicant to place a mobile home on his property, which is a privilege that many property owners in the neighborhood enjoy. E Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes. The proposed Variance would allow the applicant to remove 1497 square feet of mangroves and other predevelopment vegetation totaling 2,056 square feet in order to locate a mobile home on his property in a manner that is harmonious with the purpose and intent of the LDC. Doing so would not be injurious to the neighborhood or detrimental to the public welfare due to the fact that extensive mangrove clearing has already occurred throughout the neighborhood, prior to the adoption of the LDC language prohibiting it without a Variance. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? Yes, Staff conducted a site visit and observed that half of the site had prohibited Brazilian Pepper vegetation present. Staff also observed that the site previously had been filled, likely from the fill that was dredged from the canal during its construction. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Approval of this Variance petition would not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan. As previously noted, the proposed use is permitted within the land use designation of the GMP in which it is located. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear Variance petitions. Since the subject variance doesn't impact any preserve area, the EAC did not hear this petition. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report VA- PL2010 -2285, Lot 80 Plantation Island, revised February 1, 2012. 1/A 11111^44 n,IOG I ^ 1 0!1 M I A /.ITATI^kl ICI AA1/1 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition VA- PL2010 -2285, Lot 80 Plantation Island to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation of approval to permit dredging and filling of up to 2,056 square feet of mangroves and predevelopment vegetation, as depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan attached to the Resolution as Exhibit A. VA- PL2010 -2285, LOT 80 PLANTATION ISLAND 1 -30 -12 Page 8 of 9 VIA M Gj NANCY G D A H, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER GROWTH AGEMENT DIVISION REVIEWED BY: RAYVOND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION LIAM D. N Jr., P.E., DIRECTOR GROWTH MANAGEM NT DIVISION BY: NWK C /ASALANGUIDA, DEPUTY�'A61 -wN i ATOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISI Olq Attachments: A. LDC Section 9.04.02 B.1. B. Resolution A. ;�6 �20 2 DATE DATE DATE 2 -17 -]L DATE Tentatively scheduled for the April 24, 2012 Board of County Commissioners Meeting VA- PL2010 -2285, LOT 80 PLANTATION ISLAND 1 -30 -12 Page 9 of 9 9.04.02 - Types of Variances Authorized A variance is authorized for any dimensional development standard, including the following: height, area, and size of structure; height of fence; size of yards and open spaces; dimensional aspects of landscaping and buffering requirements; size, height, maximum number of, and minimum setback for signs; and minimum requirements for off - street parking facilities; and for site alterations, regardless of predevelopment vegetation, on lots within the Plantation Island Unit One, Plantation Island Unit Two and Plantation Island Unit Three Subdivision (unrecorded.) A. B. Variances for signs. The variance procedure for signs is provided in section 5.06.00, the Collier County Sign Code. Variances for site alterations, regardless of predevelopment vegetation, on lots, within the Plantation Island Unit One, Unit Two and Unit Three subdivisions (unrecorded). 1. Pursuant to the A§ 380.032(3) Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and the Department of Community Affairs dated April 26, 2005, regarding Plantation Island Subdivision within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern, a variance from the requirement of subsection 4.02.14 C.4. of the Land Development Code shall be authorized for site alterations, including dredging and filling, of up to 2,500 square feet, regardless of predevelopment vegetation, on a group of adjacent lots under common ownership, including on a single lot if only one lot is owned, within Units One, Two and Three of the Plantation Island Subdivision (unrecorded) located in Section 29, Township 53 South, Range 29 East, in Collier County, Florida utilizing the procedure as set forth in section 9.04.03 of the Land Development Code and where the proposed development is designed consistent with Big Cypress Critical Area regulations to have a minimum adverse impact on the critical area's water storage capacity, surface water and estuarine fisheries as authorized by Rule 28- 25.011, Florida Administrative Code Attachment A RESOLUTION NO. 12- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO PETITION 'LIMBER VA- PL2010 -2285 GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM SUBSECTION 4.02.14.0.4 OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (MANGROVE TREES), ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 53 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the pourer to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such. business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (LDC) (Ordinance No. 04 -41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS. Petitioner has also requested a variance from subsection 4.02.14.0.4 of the LDC, pursuant to subsection 9.04.02.B.1 thereof,, to allow dredging and filling, of and related impacts to, 1240 square feet of mangroves, on a single lot within. Unit Three of the Plantation Island Subdivision (unrecorded), utilizing the procedure set forth in Section. 9.04.03 of the LDC; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals has held a public bearing with due notice made, and has considered the. advisability of granting this variance; and WHEREAS, the Board has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by the LDC; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in properly noticed public meeting, and the Board has considered all matters presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY; FLORIDA, that the Board hereby approves .a variance from LDC subsection 4.02.14.C.4, to allow dredging and filling of 2056 square feet of mangroves on tiie Property, consistent with the Site Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A, as requested in Petition VA- PL2010 -2285, filed by Richard L. Wu on behalf of Robert Beattie on property- described as: Lot 80, Plantation Island, all waterfront mobile home sites Unit 3 (Unrecorded Plat) per Official Record Book 2685, Page 765 of the public records of Collier County, Florida, lying in and being part of Section 24, Township 53 South, Range 29 East; (the "Property "); and Plantation Island/ VA PL 2010 -2285 11/22/11 Page 1 of 2 Attachment B BE IT .FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA- PL2010 -2285 be recorded in the minutes of this Board, This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote, this day of 2Q12. ATTEST: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. By: By: Deputy Clerk , Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Steven t. Williams 511� Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A Site Plan CM i - CPS - 01120110 Q � z k w - § § \ {� /}) \)\ Ld - _ ) k §!.\ ui ! ! U ) # §� §K /\\/ : a'� °y ! , �!�§ in / / f / \� \ ° !w, ) d S!. }\\ ��x § 3 § Will flag \ate �§ ] ®- ' t: - ° !4 - j ' 0 EL . (F— ` ~� . � �\`' \ ■, |/� � . _ � ■ � -- d � /�� ;, )§ § \■, .. � � � � � • 0 Q � z k w - § § \ {� /}) \)\ - Q � z k w AGENDA ITEM 8 -D Co er County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING SERVICES - -LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION -- PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: MARCH 1, 2012 RE: RZ- PL20110001572: SSP ASSOCIATES, INC. Owner /Applicant: SSP Associates, Inc. 1100 Washington Ave, Suite 3 Saginaw, MI 48601 REQUESTED ACTION• Agent: Michael R. Fernandez, AICP, RA 3560 Kraft Road, Suite 301 Naples, FL 34105 The petitioner is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an application for a rezone of the 1.75± acre site from the Commercial Intermediate District (C -3) to the Heavy Commercial District (C -5). The site consists of the northeasterly 300 feet of a 4.1- acre parcel, all of which is zoned C -3. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the southwest side of East Tamiami Trail (U.S. 41) and two miles northwest of Collier Boulevard (CR/SR -951), adjacent to Treetops Planned Unit Development and Trail Acres Subdivision, in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East (11412 East Tamiami Trail), Collier County, FL (See location map on the following page.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is located at 11412 E. Tamiami Trail. The petitioner's agent provided the following narrative in support of the proposed rezone: The land owner is seeking the change from the C -3 standard zoning district to the C -5 standard zoning district to address market demand for C -5 supported land uses, including but not limited to: "constructionldevelopment related and storage land uses"; and, potentially to support common land use(s) with abutting parcels. RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 1 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 � e • e� 1010 s HIPS 31vos OL ION / 7 Q z z 0 N I.J.. z 00 1 U 0 N J N Z O_ N I- W CL r (roW ss3xdAa OaVA3vID9 N3fTD'J 1 ey�� W � 22� �8� LSB'tl'� 61 $` Z V O W aervssw U a31TOJ (iseas) g F 3 € d 2 O 3 N m a O h S iWV � - O AM 8 vaveave virros„ s avoa NtlV9 A1HnOJ %3LWd WVW u e :C u�l� iF Co ° §01 N m n N 3Naa 3WHSAVa a N Q z z 0 N I.J.. z 00 1 U 0 N J N Z O_ N I- W CL r The petitioner's agent has not proposed any specific uses for the site, therefore all uses permitted by right in the C -5 zoning district would be allowable uses should the rezone be approved. A site plan is not required by the LDC for a rezone to a "conventional" zoning district, i.e., not a PUD, and the petitioner's agent has not offered a site plan for consideration. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING (Please refer to the Zonine Mau): Northeast: US 41, Tamiami Trail East, then Whistlers Cove PUD Northwest: Vacant commercial tract within the Treetops of Naples PUD Southwest (along US 41 frontage): Commercial uses with a zoning designation of C -5 Southeast: A vacant C -3 zoned tract also owned by the applicant. West: Residential portion of the Tree Tops PUD Location Map — property depictions are approximate GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, and is further identified within the Coastal High Hazard Area, all as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Growth Management Plan. The Urban Residential Subdistrict does not allow commercial zoning at this location. However, the existing C -3, Commercial Intermediate District, zoning on the site is deemed consistent via Policy 5.9 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The text -based Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict is applicable to this petition. The criteria of that Subdistrict are listed below, followed by staff's analysis [bold text]. RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 2 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 a. The subject site is in the Urban-Mixed Use District. [The site is so designated.] b. The subject site abuts a road classified as an arterial or collector on the Collier County Functional Class Map, as adopted in the Transportation Element. [The site abuts US -41, an arterial roadway in the Transportation Element.] c. A rezone to commercial zoning is requested for the subject property in its entirety, up to a maximum of 12 acres. For a property greater than 12 acres in size, the balance of the property in excess of 12 acres is limited to an environmental conservation easement or open space. Under this provision, "open space" shall not include water management facilities unless said facilities are incorporated into a conservation or preservation area for the purpose of enhancement of the conservation or preservation area. [The subject property in its entirety is 4.1 acres in size, thus complies with the 12 -acre cap. However, the entire parcel is not proposed for rezoning. The entire parcel is presently zoned C -3 and only the northeasterly 300 feet abuts commercial zoning on both sides (C -5 and PUD commercial). This petition seeks to rezone only that northeasterly 300 feet. The applicant could have requested a rezone for the entire site with the southwesterly portion being rezoned from C -3 to C -3, per FLUE Policy 5.1, and the northeasterly 300 feet being rezoned from C -3 to C -5, via this Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict. Staffs opinion is that this criterion is met.] d. The site abuts commercial zoning: (i) On one side and that abutting commercial site is not within an infill Subdistrict in the Urban Mixed Use District or the Urban Commercial District; or, (ii) On both sides. [The site abuts commercial zoning on both sides.] e. The abutting commercial zoning may be in the unincorporated portion of Collier County or in a neighboring jurisdiction. [Both abutting commercial parcels lie in unincorporated Collier County.] f. The depth of the subject property in its entirety, or up to 12 acres for parcels greater than 12 acres in size, for which commercial zoning is being requested, does not exceed the depth of the commercially zoned area on the abutting parcel(s). Where the subject site abuts commercial zoning on both sides, and the depth of the commercially zoned area is not the same on both abutting parcels, the Board of County Commissioners shall have discretion in determining how to interpret the depth of the commercially zoned area which cannot be exceeded, but in no case shall the depth exceed that on the abutting property with the greatest depth of commercial area. This discretion shall be applied on a case -by -case basis. [As previously noted, the entire subject parcel is currently zoned C -3, only the northeasterly 300 feet of the site abuts commercial zoning on both sides, only that northeasterly 300 feet is being requested to be rezoned to C -5, and property on both sides to a depth of at least 300 feet are zoned commercial (C -5 and PUD commercial). This criterion is met.] g. Project uses are limited to office or low intensity commercial uses if the subject property abuts commercial zoning on one side only. For property abutting commercial zoning on both sides, the project uses may include those of the highest intensity abutting commercial zoning district. [The northeasterly 300 feet of the site abuts commercial zoning on both sides, one of which is C -5. Petition request is for C -5 zoning.] h. The subject property in its entirety was not created to take advantage of this provision, evidenced by its creation prior to the adoption of this provision in the Growth Management RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 3 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 Plan on October 28, 1997. [Review of 1995 tax assessor maps reveals the parcel in its entirety (4.1 acres) existed at that time.] i. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting one side only: (i) commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met; and, (ii) uses shall be limited so as to serve as a transitional use between the commercial zoning on one side and non - commercial zoning on the other side. [Not applicable.] j. For those sites that have existing commercial zoning abutting both sides, commercial zoning used pursuant to this Subdistrict shall only be applied one time and shall not be expanded, except for aggregation of additional properties so long as all other criteria under this Subdistrict are met. [This is the first usage of this Subdistrict at this location. The commercial zoning on the subject site and the abutting parcels on each side of it is deemed "consistent by policy" under FLUE Policy 5.9 (improved property).] k. Lands zoned for support medical uses pursuant to the "1/4 mile support medical uses" provision in the Urban designation shall not be deemed "commercial zoning" for purposes of this Subdistrict. [Not applicable.] 1. Land adjacent to areas zoned C -1 /T on the zoning atlas maps, or other commercial zoning obtained via the former Commercial Under Criteria provision in the FLUE, shall not be eligible for a rezone under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, except through aggregation as provided in Paragraphs i. and j. above. [Not applicable.] m. For purposes of this Subdistrict, property abutting land zoned Industrial or Industrial PUD, or abutting lands zoned for Business Park uses pursuant to the Business Park Subdistrict, or abutting lands zoned for Research and Technology Park uses pursuant to the Research and Technology Park Subdistrict, shall also qualify for commercial zoning so long as all other criteria under the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict are met. [Not applicable.] n. At time of development, the project will be served by central public water and sewer. [County central water and sewer is available at this location.] o. The project will be compatible with existing land uses and permitted future land uses on surrounding properties. [Comprehensive Planning staff defers this determination to Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety.] p. The maximum acreage eligible to be utilized for the Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict within the Urban Mixed Use District is 250 acres. [This maximum has not been reached.] Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition and has determined that no net new trips are proposed. As such, the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period. Therefore, the subject application can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental staff has evaluated the amendment for consistency with the CCME. Environmental review staff has RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 4 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 determined the petition may be found consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed amendment. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the FLUE and FLUM designations is a portion of the overall finding that is required, and staff believes the petition is consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan as discussed above. The proposed amendment is consistent with the GMP Transportation Element as previously discussed. Environmental staff also recommends that the petition be found consistent with the COME. Therefore, zoning staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP if the conditions recommended by staff are adopted as part of any approval. ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.03.05.I, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings "), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the bases for their recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: This project site contains no jurisdictional wetlands and sparse native canopy trees. The understory (both mid story and ground cover) have been historically cleared since 1975 per Collier County aerials. The site is dominated primarily by Brazilian Pepper trees. No signs of any listed species were observed during the site visit. Due to the lack of native habitat as defined by the LDC due to historical clearing and maintenance, no designated county preserve will be required. Transportation Review: Transportation Division staff has reviewed the petition for right -of -way and access issues as well as roadway capacity, and recommends approval. Transportation Division staff compared C -3 to C -5 Zoning district uses pursuant to the current LDC. There are no trip generators allowed by C -5 that would exceed those listed in C -3 for traffic intensity. C -3 allows the following (high trip generating) uses: LUC 220 and LUC 230; Apartment and Condo uses, respectively. LUC 710 (Office) LUC 820 (Retail) LUC 850 (Supermarket) LUC 912 (Drive thru bank) Zoning Services Review: As noted previously, because this petition is seeking a rezone to a "conventional" zoning district, i.e., not a PUD, there is no site plan associated with it. RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 5 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses on the subject site, the compatibility analysis might include a review of both the subject proposal and surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location, traffic generation/attraction, etc. There has to be a balance between the adjacent existing uses and what is allowable by the GMP. LDC Section 2.03.03.0 described the current C -3 zoning as follows: Commercial Intermediate District (C -3). The purpose and intent of the commercial intermediate district (C -3) is to provide for a wider variety of goods and services intended for areas expected to receive a higher degree of automobile traffic. The type and variety of goods and services are those that provide an opportunity for comparison shopping, have a trade area consisting of several neighborhoods, and are preferably located at the intersection of two- arterial level streets. Most activity centers meet this standard. This district is also intended to allow all of the uses permitted in the C -1 and C- 2 zoning districts typically aggregated in planned shopping centers. This district is not intended to permit wholesaling type of uses, or land uses that have associated with them the need for outdoor storage of equipment and merchandise. A mixed -use project containing a residential component is permitted in this district subject to the criteria established herein. The C -3 district is permitted in accordance with the locational criteria for commercial and the goals, objectives, and policies as identified in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible in the C- 3 district and the urban mixed use land use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in the C -3 district shall not exceed the density permissible under the density rating system. To contrast, LDC Section 2.03.03.E described the proposed C -5 zoning as follows: Heavy Commercial District (C -S). In addition to the uses provided in the C -4 zoning district, the heavy commercial district (C -5) allows a range of more intensive commercial uses and services which are generally those uses that tend to utilize outdoor space in the conduct of the business. The C -5 district permits heavy commercial services such as full - service automotive repair, and establishments primarily engaged in construction and specialized trade activities such as contractor offices, plumbing, heating and air conditioning services, and similar uses that typically have a need to store construction associated equipment and supplies within an enclosed structure or have showrooms displaying the building material for which they specialize. Outdoor storage yards are permitted with the requirement that such yards are completely enclosed or opaquely screened. The C -5 district is permitted in accordance with the locational criteria for uses and the goals, objectives, and policies as identified in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 6 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC The chart below compares the site development criteria of the existing C -3 zoning districts and the proposed C -5 zoning district. Excerpts from LDC Site Design Standards Tables for Most Non - Waterfront Principal Uses (LDC Section 4.02.01.A) Zoning District Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Lot Area (square Lot Width Building Height Setback Setback Setback feet) Maximum C 50% of BH 50% BH 50% BH -3 < 25 feet < 15 feet < 15 feet 10,000 75 50 C -5 25 15 15 10,000 1 100 1 35 All numbers shown are the required minimum amounts All numbers shown are in feet unless otherwise noted BH = building height s = equal to but not less than The table and its footnotes show the rezoning to the C -5 zoning district will not significantly alter the required property development regulations. If a 50 foot tall structure were constructed in the C -3 zoning district, the setback could be increased to 25 feet (50% of the building height), whereas in the C -5 district the maximum height requirement would only allow a 35 foot high structure with a setback of 15 feet, which is the minimum requirement in the C -3, that would be applicable to shorter structures. Any outdoor storage would need to be screened as noted in the purpose and intent cited above. Below is a portion of the Tree Tops PUD site plan. Tract A is the abutting tract to the subject parcel in this rezone request. Ordinance No. 80 -91, the most recent action for that PUD, indicates that a variety of commercial uses, ranging from the C -1 thru C -5 zoning districts are permitted in Tract A. RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 b V da "{ �5 V4 i 'ss� .... -may ��• +�.� �. Yr. \ ; ,•�'' r • as 1 yG� Page 7 of 13 Subject Prooertv Page 7 of 13 The site "behind" this tract, is owned by the applicant and is zoned C -3; the property to the southwest along the US 41 frontage is zoned C-5. Across US 41 is the preserve area for the Whistler's Cove PUD as shown below. - -- f - - -- - - - -� - ----------------- -------------- ��. lo� 5, N tarscrarmrlrPi PRWO= VOM= Y4rr,vorr NA1tK4 HMrAr tt AAtA LiAti i \ \ 2W MWUM SE-1610 \ �_ FRGFGiED fX1TrACI mcNmr�sFuaut N �-�, - -- . �-- ------- f�-- --------------- 1 Staff does not foresee any negative impacts from the proposed rezone because the LDC requires buffering to separate uses. A 10 foot wide Type A buffer with trees spaced no more than 30 feet on center as shown below, would be required to separate other commercial parcels. TYPE 'A' BUFFER I lc� At the northwestern property corner is a property line that is shared by the residential portion of the Tree Tops PUD. As shown in the aerial below, the area abutting the shared property corner appears to be a vegetated common area of this condominium development. (Property lines are approximate) RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 8 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 Staff does not foresee that the uses that could develop on this site should the rezone be approved would be any more intrusive to the residential area of Treetops than the uses already allowed in the commercial tract within the Treetops PUD. The screening, buffering and setbacks required by the LDC and the PUD document should adequately address any potential incompatibility of the proposed new uses. Zoning Staff is of the opinion that this project will be compatible with the adjacent uses and zoning in the area. FINDINGS OF FACT: Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10. 03.051 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable" (Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, & policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The zoning analysis provides an in -depth review of the proposed project. Staff is of the opinion that the project as proposed is consistent with GMP FLUE Policy 5.4 requiring the project to be compatible with neighborhood development. Staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. The petition can also be deemed consistent with the CCME and the Transportation Element of the GMP. Therefore, staff recommends that this petition be deemed consistent with the overall GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern; Staff has described the existing land use pattern in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed it at length in the zoning review analysis. Staff believes the proposed rezone is appropriate given the existing land use pattern, and development restrictions of the LDC. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; As noted in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" and the zoning review analysis portions of this report there is abutting C -5 zoned lands thus approval of this rezone would not create an isolated district. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Staff is of the opinion that the district boundaries will be logically drawn given the current property ownership boundaries and the existing commercial zoning strip along US 41. This parcel mirrors the depth of the approved commercial uses and does not encroach in to the residential areas that are located further from US 41. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 9 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 The proposed rezone is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek the rezone to allow the owner the opportunity to develop the land with uses other than what the existing zoning district would allow. 6 Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Staff is of the opinion that the proposed rezone can been deemed consistent County's land use policies that are reflected by the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. Development in compliance with the applicable LDC requirements should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project. Transportation Staff has reviewed the petition and believes the petition can be deemed consistent with the Transportation Element of the GMP. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; The proposed rezone should not create drainage or surface water problems. The developer of any uses will be required to adhere to a surface water management permit from the SFWMD in conjunction with any local site development plan approvals and ultimate construction on site. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; If this petition is approved, any subsequent development would need to comply with the applicable LDC standards for development. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market conditions. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; The proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 10 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 The proposed rezone complies with the Growth Management Plan which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations; however, the petitioner is seeking this rezone in compliance with LDC provisions for such action. The petition can be evaluated and action taken as deemed appropriate through the public hearing process. Staff believes the proposed rezone meets the intent of the C -5 zoning district, and further, believes the public interest will be maintained. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; As noted previously, the petitioner is seeking to rezone only that portion of the land that aligns with the existing commercial uses along this section of US 41. The proposed rezone area does not encroach into the nearby residential areas. The GMP is a policy statement which has evaluated the scale, density and intensity of land uses deemed to be acceptable throughout the urban - designated areas of Collier County. Staff is of the opinion that the development standards of the LDC will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. The proposed rezone is consistent with the GMP as discussed in other portions of the staff report. 16 The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Additional development anticipated by the rezone would require considerable site alteration. This project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan or platting approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 11 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. Further review of this issue will occur when platting or site development approvals are sought. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The NIM meeting was duly noticed by the applicant and held on January 5, 2012 at 5:30 pm. Those attending were Collier County planners Kay Deselem and Michael Sawyer; and, representatives of the petitioner and the petitioner's agents. A singular attendee, Amy Sherman, who received notification as a family member of a Tree Tops PUD condominium unit owner attended. The petitioner's agent, Michael Fernandez, explained the property location and the proposed zoning change. Ms. Sherman indicated that she had reviewed online the permitted uses of both the C -3 and C -5 zoning districts and believed that she preferred the list of C -3 uses and was specifically concerned how the development of the vacant property would impact the Tree Tops PUD driveway. It then was determined that her concerns were relative to the undeveloped commercial tract within the Tree Tops PUD which she had mistakenly assumed was the subject of the rezone. The agent provided Ms. Sherman with a copy of the governing Tree Top PUD Documents for the property. It was stated by the petitioner's agent that the existing C -3 zoning district has a maximum height of 50 ft; and, that the proposed C -5 zoning district has a 35 ft maximum height — which height is more effectively buffered by landscaping, trees and setbacks. Michael Fernandez then reviewed the proposed zoning change consistent with the attached narrative submitted with the application and attached for reference. County Planner Kay Deselem reviewed why the County requires the NIM and presented her own contact information, encouraging Ms. Sherman to call either staff or Michael Fernandez with any questions she may have; Ms. Sherman was advised that notices for the subsequent public hearings would be forthcoming and she would be welcome to attend and speak at those subsequent meetings. Meeting was closed around 6:10 pm. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for this petition on February 1, 2012. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning and Land Development Review Services staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition RZ- PL20110001572 to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc. Page 12 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 2/8/12 PREPARED BY: KA D ELEM, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REVIEWED BY: RAYM ND V. BE LOWS, ZONING MANAGER DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES /.2 5- AZ ATE J -26 -IZ DATE { l• 2.7-Z (>tZ LIAM D. LORE & , JR., ff., DIRECTOR DATE DEPARTMENT OF LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPROVE ,D BY: 11j, GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION i -i 7 -i L DATE Tentatively scheduled for the April 24, 2012 Board of County Commissioners Meeting RZ- PL20110001572: SSP Associates, Inc Page 13 of 13 March 13, 2012 CCPC Revised: 1/25/12 ORDINANCE NO. 12- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A C -3 ZONING DISTRICT TO A C -5 ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS SSP ASSOCIATES, INC. REZONE LOCATED SOUTH OF TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 1.75 +/- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Michael Fernandez, AICP, RA of Planning Development, Inc. representing SSP Associates, Inc., a Michigan corporation, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the real property more particularly described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a C -3 zoning district to a C -5 zoning district for a 1.75 +/- acre project to be known as the SSP Associates, Inc. Rezone. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is /are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. SSP Associates, Inc. Rezone \RZ- PL2011 -1572 Rev. 2/01/12 1 of 2 R PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super- majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2012. ATTEST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA C , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Al r Heidi Ashton -Cicko 'Lk Assistant County attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation IC Attachment: Exhibit A — Legal Description CP \11- CPS - 01129 \11 FRED W. COYLE, Chairman SSP Associates, Inc. Rezone \RZ- PL2011 -1572 Rev. 2/01/12 2 of 2 South Florida Surveying Inc. 2421 23rd Street S. W. Naples, Florida 34117 Phone: (239) 34-1169 sfsinc@soulhj7oridasurvej,ing.com com http: / /Www.southfloridasurveying. com CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION #LB7624 LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH - NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY I A PORTION OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4318, PAGE 459, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. LYING WITHIN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICU FOLLOWS: } COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER C ACRES, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 5( RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PROLONGATION THEREOF, 410.00 FEET, TO THE P THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 50'56' EAST, 300 FEEI WITH A LINE RUNNING PARALLEL TO AND 150 FEI (AS MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) THE CENTERLIJ (U.S. HIGHWAY 41), AS SHOWN ON SAID PLAT; THENCE NORTH 39'04' WEST, ALONG SAID LINE 2 THENCE SOUTH 50'56' WEST, 300.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 39'04' EAST, 253.76 FEET, TO TH DESCRIBED LAND CONTAINS 76,128 SQUARE FEET REMAINDER OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECI BOOK 4318, PAGE 459 �v POINT OF COMMENCEMENT SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER BLOCK 2, TRAIL ACRES Exhibit A V 1 Y1Z1 i 111.1 "l./ H 1 J_J 120 0 60 120 ( W FEET ) 1 inch = 120 ft PATH: \MIS COLL \SSP ASSOCIATES DWG COLLIER COUNTY SMALL SCALE ADOPTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT Project: GMPA- PL20 1 1 000260 1 Petition: CPSS- 2011 -1 CCPC: March 01, 2012 continued to March 06, 2012 BCC: April 24, 2012 AGENDA ITEM 8 -E This item has been delivered separately from Comprehensive Planning CPSS- 2011 -1: A petition requesting a small scale Growth Management Plan amendment to the "Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict ", to remove paragraph b., relating to transportation intersection improvements, and to remove related paragraph c.v., for property located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive, in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East (± 10 acres). [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner.] ADOPTION HEARINGS. TABLE OF CONTENTS CCPC —Project: GMPA- PL20110002601/Petition: CPSS - 2011 -1 Small Scale Growth Management Plan (GMT) Adoption Amendments March 01, 2012 Agenda 1) TAB: Table of Contents. 2) TAB: Legal Advertising. 3) TAB: Ordinance. 4) TAB: CPSS- 2011 -1 Staff Report. 5) TAB: Project/Petition PL20110002601 /CPS S- 2011 -1 DOCUMENT: CCPC Table of Contents DOCUMENT: CCPC Adoption Advertising DOCUMENTS: Adoption Ordinance & Exhibit "A" Text Changes DOCUMENT: Adoption CCPC Staff Report DOCUMENTS: Project/Petition; Letter of No Objection - (Italian- American Club); Transportation Analysis PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) will hold a public meeting on Thursday, March 01, 2012 at 9:00 A.M. in the Board of County Commissioner's Chamber, Third Floor, County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL. The purpose of the hearing is to consider recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) the adoption of a Small Scale Growth Management Plan amendment to the Future Land Use Element. The ordinance title is as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 12- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MAN- AGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, BY REMOVING TRANSPORTATION COMMIT- MENTS FROM THE ORANGE BLOSSOM /AIRPORT CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL SUBDIS- TRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTON OF ORANGE BLOS- SOM DRIVE AND AIRPORT ROAD, IN SECTION 2 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. n C.R. 858 C.R. 846 � a a C PSS- 2011 -1 o, I < G.G. BLVD. � I PINE RIDGE RD. al a a 5,iA::TE G.G. PKWY. � S.R.- 84 1 -75 DAMS BLVD. PL20110002601 /Petition CPSS- 2011 -1, A petition requesting a small scale Growth Management Plan amendment to the "Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Sub - district ", to remove para- graph b., relating to transportation intersection improvements, and to remove related paragraph c.v., for property located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive, in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East (± 10 acres). [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner.] ADOPTION HEARING All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment will be made available for inspection at the Land Development Services Department, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. Furthermore the materials will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, suite 401 Naples, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Any questions pertaining to the documents should be di- rected to the Comprehensive Planning Section. Written comments filed with the Clerk to the Board's Office prior to Thursday, March 01, 2012, will be read and considered at the public hearing. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the CCPC with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of that proceeding, and for such purpose he may need to en- sure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112 -5356, (239) 252 -8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Mark P. Strain, Chairman Naples, FL No.240173987 February 10 2012 ORDINANCE NO. 12- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89 -05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT, BY REMOVING TRANSPORTATION COMMITMENTS FROM THE ORANGE BLOSSOM/AIRPORT CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL SUB- DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTON OF ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE AND AIRPORT ROAD IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. seq., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Collier County staff requested amendments to the Future Land Use Element to modify the Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Subsection 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes, this amendment is considered a Small Scale Amendment; and WHEREAS, the Subdistrict property is not located in an area of critical state concern or an area of critical economic concern; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) on considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and and recommended Page 1 of 3 CPSS- 2011 -1 \Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Small Scale Adoption Amendment Rev. 01/20/12 Words underlined are added; words stniek thr-ough have been deleted; * * * indicates break in pages WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County did take action in the manner prescribed by law and held public hearings concerning the proposed adoption of the amendments to the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan on , 2012; and WHEREAS, all applicable substantive and procedural requirements of law have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts this small scale amendment to the Future Land Use Element in accordance with Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. The text amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: SEVERABILITY. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. The effective date of this plan amendment, if the amendment is not timely challenged, shall be 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, this amendment shall become effective on the date the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining this adopted amendment to be in compliance. No development orders, development permits, or land uses dependent on this amendment may be issued or commence before it has become effective. If a final order of noncompliance is issued by the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which resolution shall be sent to the state land planning agency. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2012. Page 2 of 3 CPSS- 2011 -1 \Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Small Scale Adoption Amendment Rev. 01/20/12 Words underlined are added; words struck thr-atigh have been deleted; * * * indicates break in pages ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA IM , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi Ashton- Cicko, \? Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment CP\ 12 -CMP- 00816 \4 FRED W. COYLE, Chairman Page 3 of 3 CPSS- 2011 -1 \0range Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Small Scale Adoption Amendment Rev. 01/20/12 Words underlined are added; words stfuek thfough have been deleted; * * * indicates break in pages Exhibit A CPSS- 2011 -1 Future Land Use Element [Page 62] C. Urban Commercial District 11. Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two parcels comprising approximately 10 acres and is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. This Subdistrict allows for existing institutional uses, such as the Italian American Club clubhouse or another social or fraternal organization, future institutional uses for a school, and limited commercial, professional and general offices, and similar uses to serve the nearby community, along with senior housing in the form of an assisted living facility, continuing care retirement center, or other similar housing for the elderly. Development intensity for this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 74,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions, schools, professional, medical and general offices, adult and child day care, personal and business services, and a maximum of 20,000 square feet for the clubhouse facility, all of which uses are allowed by right or by conditional use in the C -1 Zoning District, as identified in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04- 41, as amended. Uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning of each parcel to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties. Any senior housing facility is not subject to this square footage limitation but must meet all other provisions in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, in effect as of the effective date of this amendment. The development of this Subdistrict shall be governed by the following criteria: a. Rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development and must contain development standards to ensure that all uses will be compatible with neighboring residential and institutional uses. approved plans shall be adyekised fGF GGAMR19tiOR thFough the Gounty's epeR bidding s. b. Parcel 1 This approximately 5 -acre parcel is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. This parcel is limited to a maximum of 34,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions, schools, professional, medical and general offices, and personal and business services, in addition to a maximum of 20,000 square feet for the clubhouse facility. Parcel 1 is governed by the additional, following requirements: Words underlined are added; words stFUsh are deleted Exhibit A CPSS - 2011 -1 i. Pedestrian interconnection to access Parcel 2 and property immediately to the west must be pursued by the property owner, and incorporated into the overall site design. ii. Vehicular interconnection with Parcel 2 is required, particularly to provide southbound traffic direct egress onto Airport Road. Vehicular use areas, buildings and structures, landscape buffering and open space, and other uses shall be designed in such a manner that does not impede or interfere with access to or from the adjacent parcel to the south. iii. The existing easternmost vehicular access drive onto Orange Blossom Drive shall be removed or permanently closed -off by the property owner prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any further development or redevelopment of the site. iv. Development within Parcel 1 shall have common site, signage and building architectural elements, including on -site signs directing motorists toward southbound egress through Parcel 2 onto Airport Road. "b". above if it Gan be demonstrated that the tFaRspeFtatien imparts of the faGility do nGt yrn icS d c. Parcel 2 This approximately 5 -acre parcel is located on the west side of Airport Road, approximately 330 feet south of the intersection of Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive. This parcel is limited to a maximum of 40,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions, professional, medical and general offices, adult and child day care, personal and business services, and an assisted living facility, continuing care retirement center, or other similar housing for the elderly. Parcel 2 is governed by the additional, following requirements: L Pedestrian interconnection to access Parcel 1 and properties immediately to the south and to the west must be pursued by the property owner, and incorporated into the overall site design. ii. Vehicular interconnection with Parcel 1 is required, particularly to provide eastbound traffic direct egress onto Orange Blossom Drive. Vehicular use areas, buildings and structures, landscape buffering and open space, and other uses shall be designed in such a manner that does not impede or interfere with access to or from the adjacent parcel to the north. iii. Development within Parcel 2 shall have common site, signage and building architectural elements, including on -site signs directing motorists toward northbound egress through Parcel 1 onto Orange Blossom Drive. Words underlined are added; words strusk t#Foug# are deleted Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Agenda ItemX8E Col �ie-r Co-r�-ih.ty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, PLANNING AND REGULATION, LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: MARCH 1, 2012 RE: PETITION NO. CPSS- 2011 -1, ORANGE BLOSSOM /AIRPORT CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT SMALL SCALE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [ADOPTION HEARING] APPLICANT /OWNERS: Applicant and Owner: Michael Corradi, for Corradi Airport Road, Inc. 40 Seagate Drive, #904 Naples, FL 34103 Owner: Naples Italian American Club Foundation, Inc. 7035 Airport Road North Naples, FL 34107 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property contains approximately 10 acres and is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Airport Road (CR 31) and Orange Blossom Drive. The property has approximately 660 feet of frontage on Orange Blossom Drive and 660 feet of frontage on Airport Road North (a.k.a., Airport- Pulling Road). The property lies within the North Naples Planning Community in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East. REQUESTED ACTION: This petition seeks to amend the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan to remove transportation commitments relating to intersection improvements, and a related provision, from the Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict language in the Urban Mixed Use District. - 1 - 'Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item X $e C. Urban Commercial District 11. Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Proposed Future Land Use Element Text Amendment [removing that part of the Subdistrict language applicable to the entire 10 acres]: [and, as a consequence of deleting provision "b" above, staff recommends removing that part of the Subdistrict language that serves as an exception from the provision, applicable to an existing use located on a five acre portion of the Subdistrict]: Both of these proposed text amendments are reflected in the Ordinance Exhibit "A" prepared for this small -scale amendment. STAFF ANALYSIS: In October of 2008, Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopted an amendment to the County's Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and Future Land Use Map (FLUM) establishing the Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict (Crossroads Subdistrict). The Crossroads Subdistrict consists of approximately ten acres, unifying two neighboring five -acre tracts, and limits their development intensity to uses found in the C -1, Commercial Professional and General Office Zoning District.. The northerly five acres includes as allowable uses, up to 34,000 sq. ft. of financial institutions, schools, professional, medical and general offices, and personal and business services — in addition to the 20,000 sq. ft. for the clubhouse facility. The southerly five acres includes as allowable uses, up to 40,000 sq. ft. of financial institutions, professional, medical and general offices, adult and child day care, personal and business services, and an assisted living facility, continuing care retirement center or other similar senior housing. In September of 2009, the Naples Italian American Club obtained a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) rezone for the northerly portion of the Subdistrict. No development has occurred, other than that related to the clubhouse facility, in accordance with the provisions of the Subdistrict. In a presentation to the BCC in October of 2011, the applicant explained how the Subdistrict's transportation commitments relating to intersection improvements "inhibit positive progress, job creation, and an easier flow of impact fees "; going on to say, how these commitments had been -2- ..Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item,�e$E "introduced during a period of heightened caution over traffic congestion [at] the peak of development. The circumstances that warranted this language no longer exist ". Transportation Analysis Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the available traffic data in the vicinity of this petition, and has determined that the adjacent roadway network will have sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the five year planning period. Concurrency values were analyzed consistently with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. An estimated [positive] growth rate of 1.5% annually was assumed in background traffic volumes in order to analyze the projected 2016 scenario in terms of intersection approach traffic volumes. See the table provided in the exhibit below. AAport Road Trani VanderW Bead Road to Cra�ge P scorn tk Airport Road from orange BPassorn PJr toe Padge P2d Orange abmm from Owdette-Rank Rd to Apoil R'ling Rd: GMV abssw Tana APrport- Pr" Rd to trv8ngsW Rd. Exhibit A service 2011 Added Volume Tod Remak" VIM 2011 VIM 2016 LOS (C3Pa*) Volume C=Cdty Std Ratro LOS 2016 Ratio EELS E 397D 2091 1879 E 0.53 C 1 2111 2.53 C E 3970 2090 1880 E 0.53 C 2230 a.56 575 275 D 0.68 C 619 0.73 EE D 92a 575 345 D 0.63 C 619 0.67 C Orange Blossom Drive Impacts: Staff analyzed the Orange Blossom Drive concurrency links that are impacted by this project. A nominal growth rate of 1.5% was applied to Link 142, Orange Blossom Drive from Goodlette Road to Airport Road, and link 143 from Airport Road to Livingston. These segments of Orange Blossom Drive currently have a remaining capacity of 275 trips, and 345 trips (respectively); and are both currently operating at LOS "C" as reflected by the adopted 2011 AUIR. Staff has determined that this segment will continue to operate at LOS "C" during the five year planning period. Airport Road Impacts: Staff analyzed the Airport Road concurrency links that are impacted by this project. A nominal growth rate of 1.5% was applied to Link 2.1 from Vanderbilt Beach Road to Orange Blossom Drive; and link 2.2 from Orange Blossom Drive to Pine Ridge. These segments of Airport Road currently have a remaining capacity of 1,879 trips, and 1,880 trips (respectively); and are both currently operating at LOS "C" as reflected by the adopted 2011 AUIR. Staff has determined that these segments will continue to operate at LOS "C" during the five year planning period. As a result of this analysis, Transportation Planning staff recommends that this amendment can be deemed consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan without the need for additional mitigation. While this amendment proposes to remove certain transportation commitments, it does not have the effect of removing them in their entirety. Rather, Orange Blossom Drive — Airport Road intersection improvement plans that are now required to: 1) be approved prior to any development order approval; with construction per the approved improvement plans required to 2) commence prior to the issuance of building permits; and, for improvements to 3) be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on a parcel, will take place along another timeline. -3- Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Agenda Item �0 se, Improvements will be planned and constructed concurrent with the demand for said improvements, ensuring that the transportation facilities necessary to maintain the adopted level of service standards are available when the impacts of development occur. The process for adoption of small -scale plan amendments is described in subsection 163.3187, Florida Statutes. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING SYNOPSIS: The Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05.F was conducted January 19, 2012. Approximately twenty -four people other than the applicant and County staff attended the NIM, held in the North Collier Government Services Center, 6825 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples and heard the following information: The applicant, Michael Corradi, introduced his request for the small -scale Plan amendment and reviewed the specific provision proposed for removal. Mr. Corradi explained how the original Subdistrict provisions were based on the traffic conditions at that time — in a good economy. Also present at that time was a group of property owners of other land surrounding this intersection who would be financially responsible for the cost of their share of these intersection improvements. Since then, the economy has declined into recession, the property owner group is no longer able to meet financial commitments, and traffic on the roads this development impacts has decreased to a level that intersection improvements are no longer needed to accommodate traffic conditions — and requirements for such are not necessary. Discussion surrounded the preliminary improvement plans for the Airport — Orange Blossom intersection, and how this proposed amendment changes those improvements. Mr. Corradi explained that his proposal does not affect the improvement plans or improvements themselves. The effect from changing the Subdistrict provisions would allow those improvements to take place at another time — when development itself is proposed and traffic impacts would be realized. The impact fees paid by the developer would cover the costs of a share of the intersection improvements. An attendee asked about what Mr. Corradi has planned for development of the subject property. Mr. Corradi indicated he has no immediate plans to plat or develop the property for any specific uses. He explained how the required transportation commitments have had a negative effect on his ability to market and develop the property. Removing the specific provision will ease these restraints and allow the property to be successfully marketed and developed. Discussion surrounded how the roadway improvements would take place, if no longer required by the provisions proposed for removal. Mr. Corradi explained how they would be planned and constructed in conformance with the County's standards — when demand is evident and improvements are necessary — in the same manner as other landowners and developers meet their requirements. A representative of the Naples Italian American Club spoke, affirming much of what Mr. Corradi had explained. The same provisions requiring intersection improvements to be completed before new development could take place apply to their half of the Subdistrict, and also negatively affected the developable portions of their property. They would benefit from the proposed small -scale amendment as much as would Mr. Corradi. He affirmed the Club's position of no objection to Mr. Corradi's proposal. No one in attendance expressed opposition to the proposal. No major issues or contentions were raised or discussed. No statements of commitment were made by the applicant. [Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] -4- Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: Agenda Item 8¢'E This Staff Report has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and is legally sufficient. (ST Kq STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition CPSS- 2011 -1 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: DATE: I Corby L. Sc midt, AICP, Principal Planner Comprehen ive Planning Section Land Devel ,pment Services Department C' - 1,c DATE: -;Z ��✓ �Z David C. Weeks, AICP, GMP Manager Comprehensive Planning Section Land Development Services Department ` oliam Lorenz, P.E.,'Directory L evelopment Services Department i APPROVED BY: DATE- Nick Casalanguida, pu yA ministrator Growth Management Division /Planning and Regulation PETITION NO.: CPSS- 2011 -1 Staff Report for the March 1, 2012 CCPC Meeting. Z- -17- /Z NOTE: This petition has been scheduled for the April 24, 2011 BCC Meeting. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Mark P. Strain, Chairman GACDES Planning ServiceslComprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA1Comp Plan Amendments12011 Small Scale Amendments\CPSS- 2011 -1, Crossroads Commercial Subdistri6CPSS- 2011 -1 DRAFT Staff Report_3.doc -5- 4 Qroje PL2,otI coo 2(. c APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN Son% APPLICATe+H NUMBER C�`JS- 20l DATE RECEIVED 1 l I (l 1 ZOt 1 PRE - APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE N/A DATE SUFFICIENT r4IA This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Comprehensive Planning Department, Suite 400, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239 - 252 -2400 (Fax 239 - 252 - 2946). The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing o f f he application, see Resolution 97 -431 as amended by Resolution 98 -18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239 - 252 -2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION M �/ A. Name of Applicant ` l� A L '\ � �q Company C_oRRiftDf A iR i3bil: =tVC: A Address �0 1_�A 6_41-6 D;2- • City IVA C eS State FL&f C>-'t >> Zip Code 3 q10 Phone Number( � 3a ) _2 �§ S�8 Fax Number /\/ //4 B. Name of Agent* MJLhAeL_ k.. ZoRj'L&D". MKC LO er,AJgPI-ES• e-4- • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Address City Phone Number State Fax Number Zip Code C. Name of Owner (s) of Record cl oil 1z A D i /of I Rro ;c ANC •� Address City V A PLC—S State FLOIL'D If Phone Number Fax Number Zip Code 3V14-3 D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. IL Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Poi AAv-L /�. ��.�i lob Ya C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership 2 Date of Contract: F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, part nership, or trust. Name and Address G. Date subject property acquired () leased ():-Term of lease yrs. /mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 111 - DDS -R PTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PR ke-L Nu., Q 0 r5 o o Q o _j q g C-0MJ" A I SE /A/ P- OF s &C_ Q, A/ DLVE L W 1- 708 -to F4, S 'S9 ve6 W t®o.o-7 F-r K[ Q1d SP-3 i t+9n P o is , 5 5q !DiE�C W (b (® r--r, � B. GENERAL LOCATION &US /*t9 k- P_JD . NAlbv,�S� FL 34tu1 C. PLANNING COMMUNITY E. SIZE IN ACRES G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTER H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: D. TAZ ZONING A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Traffic Circulation Sub - Element Aviation Sub - Element Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element Solid Waste Sub - Element Capital Improvement Element Future Land Use Element Recreation /Open Space Mass Transit Sub - Element Potable Water Sub- Element NGWAR Sub - Element Drainage Sub - Element CCME Element Golden Gate Master Plan Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S) G � OFTHE �'��'< L - --lUS2 ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Stake fhFo gh to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: L c ► t�- �' y2�16%Zr� P trf r f ( b) . o 7-7f 0 PZ,,4oJ4 €' i�Poil GZI D&SZor+as Ca 1t�G S�6t�rsjrz�� C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM !" tA- TO D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) /P( E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I" =400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1 /2 x 1 1 shall be provided of all aerials and /or maps. A. LAND USE Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT - FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and /or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.),Identify historic and /or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J- 11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1. 1.2 (Copies attached). 1. - / INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1�1 Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1) (a) (5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1) (a)7.a, F.A.C.) Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1) (c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J- 11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and /or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J- 5.006(5) F.A.C.). -' If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the rspe��dvs�at�d of et�viron+enteflysensi#ivland gfaty»datsr and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9-1-11.007, F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES l . Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Potable Water Sanitary Sewer Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS Drainage Solid Waste Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and /or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). Location of.wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable Wk Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable Wf A High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION $16,700.00 non - refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) $9,000.00 non - refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1 " =400' or at a scale as determined during the pre - application meeting. 10-11.1 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN f �/ I hereby authorize i G E v Y` - �© /Z /r?- (Name of Agent) to serve as my Agent in a request to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan affecting property identified in this Application. / Signed: aRRA -Di` 4,410072-r > �rNC, Date: L _ (Name of Owner(s) of Record I hereby certify that I have the authority to make the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. c FE KV10R•GUERRIERI ft" - odf fo6da Signature of Applicant • f #C0W*"Ex*2n6Apr22,201 CWJMWM 0 DD 781331 "' Name - Typed or Printed STATE OF COUNTY OF Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of-� b MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 1I n Nota Pubic CH SE ONE TH F I v who is personally known to me, who has produced as identification and �id take an Oath did not take and Oath NOTICE - BE AWARE THAT: Florida Statute Section 837.06 - False Official Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of %500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term." Print Map Properties 11 ' Feet of 6925 Airport • s -r F l YL r � � � k x 6 Page 1 of 1 -. MAP LEG -END 1 • Street Names is F c� L C-o m m c (LC_ i air L 1 0'\-> . Parcels ! J Subdivisions Aerials 2411 J6 Inch U,bani _ Aerials 2444 j2 FEET] b I-1 Building Footprints Collier County Folio Number. 00238000005 Name: CORRADI AIRPORT INC Street# 8: Name: 6925 AIRPORT RD N Legal Description: 2 49 25 COMM AT SE CNR OF SEC 2, N 2DEG W 1708.1 OFT, S 89DEG W 100.07FT W R/W SR 31 AND POB, S 89DEG W 660FT. N v 4 ' ® 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to -date information, no v+aranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. �. LPL1ZL.\SL,E. 6F 'V Aatf.S ass iSAt(> b \V % W-�° RCT }1��tti� I1�St 15��rr http: / /www.collierappraiser. com/webmap /mapprint.aspx? title = Properties %20with- in %20... 11/14/2011 • 6Z i(�Q a 19-90 CA— c� L C-o m m c (LC_ i air L 1 0'\-> . http: / /www.collierappraiser. com/webmap /mapprint.aspx? title = Properties %20with- in %20... 11/14/2011 . - - - - 9502N I B 1R iB x 1 TIMBERLINE al 1 O DRIVE PUD "... ....rr qy a I"�'• -��.. 1 9'N 4e ,J xI a3 EMERALD LAKES ze - - - - -, m R is mar 1z xBR' BUGKMPUD ; 3s]/ 3]s 3B T 3s Js n ao xB MIXED USE Of B DRnwncF nuo ° `o; n.I) J CONBERV ^tqx FA6EMExi aR �� ,J Is MILL POND CIRCLE s) I68 z3 14 D , A . 7 GU 5 L ) O 5 { ] Lr ,6B o�� _I _Lo J - _ _i Gt0� RECRE^T. Apfn f ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE J 1 6 I)! 114 1)J 1,- 111 y{V RLN TRACT S RSF -1 ., r ST/W -2 - -' ' P- n ° III ° R CPUD-. UD T ITALIAN-AMERICAN CLUB ,p 3 e AT ( CA LAGOON 1141 180 a .(-yS� >B 60 I TRACT IT O B1RAC}A O S V,. PG RPUD` IL REGALOO E�-1, 10 0 SAVANNAH PLACE CIRCLE ARE UD O 4 / ! Je ,I B CIL F q O H e i I!e )p n EN y ci z � J, )12 II f0 03 11 xr Zp xB S 'ST -1 1 r - ' .� FAIRFn% GRCLE ss 67 L J THE CARLISLE 0 NAPLES PUD 12 SF -1 Z U 'TRACT B ) 1 z 14, 11) 8) e! � UEE I +° RfIEID CRQ SB x I SLEEPY HOLLOW 13 1 `\ PUD' a • 4 I n 14J 1,s y, w sB ee 14 SUNSHINE VILLAGE(S) o PREVIOUSLY YARBER Y J - (EMERALD LAKES)1•2 4 1 CIRCLE sz HYR {� LANE ' z Bz ANCHESitR OFj WORSHIP/ 15 W i y M f A - O ' 101 30` DRAMA AM Cd1SERV TIN EASEMENT 18I " 06 ,DR TRACT 0 °S 50 i 140 04 iT!W.3 //^ 1 IJB ,B ANTHONY COURT TRACT C ,7 le I w RB DRAWA°E AM —SER ARCN EASEMENT 105 -_ iB i 1JB liR I06 PUD R BEAR CREEK 1B 1 xo ' e ,T Dr , 12. ze iJ5 N4n� LOB S W -4 0 22 �S ,34 R! 1z8 N'4L. ';T 21 ,� _. I _ _ 110 I 3f fao n 2t i I 4 xy II9 t,! 1114 tl 24 I I. L _ xa I xe MILL RUN CIRCLE - 41 2 r PUD' 27 31 L ,) Js ae KEYSTONE PLACE 3,0 I 9511N J � - - - - -- INDICATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY z xo. xAMf SUBDIVISION INDEX I REFERRED TO AND ADOPTED BY REFERENCE 9Y OROINANC N0. 04 -41 Of THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT MIS IS A PAGE Of THE OEfIC1AL ZONING A11A8 D FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP INFORMATION DOP E E THE CWNTY OF COLDER, RMICA, AOOPTEO ] IE zz, 2004, p COMMUNITY NUMBER: PANEL NUMBER; 3616, J65G MIE CUO LAKE'. MLL EC ^lE 0 P911 M. NAMF PROGRAM: REGULAR CALC i 'HE ckosstucs P.B. Py I I EFFECTIVE GATE: NOV. 17 [HER.°4LIT LANE.. Ai BRNICFi LAKF OAR x -A ° �3 aB iz FL 2005 IREPLA, I D CARES, Ar BIT LARf IRrT z -B i6 4 -t ONE' ALL_Y`pR AS SHOWN NER01! PoM1E Ai MC CRDSSMCS I, I ON MAP, M V -fo° ie I BY .( .. p I CHAIRMAN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TWP 49S RNG 25E SEC(S) 02 SO 1/2 - ATTEST ) CIERk SCALE F M NUMBER: D�D 9502S (XV) 8. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict: The purpose of this Subdistrict is to encourage the development and re- development of commercially zoned properties with a mix of residential and commercial uses. The residential uses may be located above commercial uses, in an attached building, or in a freestanding building. Such mixed -use projects are intended to be developmend at a human - scale, pedestrian- oriented, and interconnected with abutting projects — whether commercial or residential. This Subdistrict is allowed in the Urban Commercial District subject to the standards and criteria set forth under the Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict in the Urban Mixed Use District. (XIII) 9.Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistict This Subdistrict consists of + 2.25 acres and is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Livingston Road and Livingston Road /East — West to be known as Veterans' Memorial Boulevard. The Subdistrict allows those office uses, medical uses and financial institutions permitted by right and by conditional use within the C -1 Zoning District of the Collier County Land Development Code, as of the effective date of adoption of this Subdistrict. (Adopted October 26, 2004 by Ordinance No. 2004 -71) This Subdistrict is designed to serve the surrounding residential uses within a convenient travel distance to the subject property. It is further designed to be compatible with the neighboring residential uses through the development standards provided herein, along with other planning considerations. The maximum development intensity allowed is 50,000 square feet of building area with a maximum height of 3 stories, not to exceed 35 feet. Access to the property within the Subdistrict shall only be permitted from Veterans Memorial Boulevard. There shall be no access permitted directly to or from Livingston Road. (XV) 10. Goodlette /Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict: This Subdistrict consists of 31 acres and is located at the northeast quadrant of two major arterial roadways, Pine Ridge Road and Goodlette -Frank Road. In addition to uses generally allowed in the Urban designation, the intent of the Goodlette /Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict is to provide shopping, person services and employment for the surrounding residential areas within a convenient travel distance. The Subdistrict is intended to be compatible with the neighboring Pine Ridge Middle School and nearby residential development and therefore, emphasis will be placed on common building architecture, signage, landscape design and site accessibility for pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as motor vehicles. Access to the Goodlette /Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict may feature a signalized traffic access point on Goodlette -Frank Road, which may provide for access to the neighboring Pine Ridge Middle School. Other site access locations will be designed consistent with the Collier County access management criteria. Development intensity within the Subdistrict will be limited to single -story retail commercial uses, while professional or medical related offices, including financial institutions, may occur in three -story buildings. A maximum of 275,000 square feet of gross leasable area for retail commercial and office and financial institution development may occur within this Subdistrict. Retail commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 125,000 square feet of gross leasable area on the south +/- 23 acres. No individual retail commercial use may exceed 65,000 square feet of gross leasable area. Unless otherwise required by the South Florida Water Management District, the .87 ± acre wetland area located on the northeastern portion of the site will be preserved. (XV) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2007 -18 on January 25, 2007 NWA (XIX) 11. Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two parcels comprising approximately 10 acres and is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. This Subdistrict allows for existing institutional uses, such as the Italian American Club clubhouse or another social or fraternal organization, future institutional uses for a school, and limited commercial, professional and general offices, and similar uses to serve the nearby community, along with senior housing in the form of an assisted living facility, continuing care retirement center, or other similar housing for the elderly. Development intensity for this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 74,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions, schools, professional, medical and general offices, adult and child day care, personal and business services, and a maximum of 20,000 square feet for the clubhouse facility, all of which uses are allowed by right or by conditional use in the C -1 Zoning District, as identified in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. Uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning of each parcel to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties. Any senior housing facility is not subject to this square footage limitation but is subject to equivalency limitations specific to Parcel 2, and must meet all other provisions in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04 -41, in effect as of the effective date of this amendment. The development of this Subdistrict shall be governed by the following criteria: a. Rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development and must contain development standards to ensure that all uses will be compatible with neighboring residential � �.• igannwZ .�q••��i•��ww,.,.��•r,•�. . - _ = r _ � .., a.�•L�fu�tiucz.�•r n��.� -- = = - - •••- - • • • • - - - -• - •- u• • G•/- nt c. Parcel This approximately 5 -acre parcel is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. This parcel is limited to a maximum of 34,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions, schools, professional, medical and general offices, and personal and business services, in addition to a maximum of 20,000 square feet for the clubhouse facility. Parcel 1 is governed by the additional, following requirements: i. Pedestrian interconnection to access Parcel 2 and property immediately to the west must be pursued by the property owner, and incorporated into the overall site design. ,-�N (XIX) = Plan Amendment by Ordinance No. 2008 -57 on October 14, 2008 63 Exhibit A CP- 2006 -7 /CP- 2006 -8 C. Urban Commercial District (:[Page 63] 11. Oranae BlossomlAimort Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two Parcels comprising approximately 10 acres and is located on the southwest comer of the intersection of Oran a Blossom Drive and Airport Road. This Subdistrict allows for existing institutional uses such as the Italian American Club clubhouse or another social or fraternal o anization future institutional uses for a school and limited commercial rofessional and .general offices and similar uses to serve the nearby communib& along with senior housing in the form of an assisted living facility continuing care retirement center, or other similar housing for the elderly, Development intensity for this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 74,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions schools rofessional medical and general offices adult and child day care personal and business services and a maximum of 20.000 ware feet for the clubhouse facility, all of which uses are allowed by right or by conditional use in the C-1 Zoning District, as identified in the Collier County Land Development Code Ordinance No 04-41 as amended. Uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning of each parcel to ensure corn atibili with surroundin ,q Properties. Anv senior housing facility is not subiect to this s uare foots a limitation but is sub'ect to eguivalency limitations slLecific to Parcel 2 and must meet all other rovisions in the Collier County Land Development Code Ordinance No 04-41 in effect as of the effective date of this amendment. The development of this Subdistrict shall be governed by the following criteria- a. Rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development and must contain develol2ment standards to ensure that all uses will be compatible with nei hborin residential and institutional uses. c. Parcel This approximately 5 -acre parcel is located on the southwest comer of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. This parcel is limited to a maximum of 34,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions schools professional. medical and general offices and Personal and business services in addition to a maximum of 20.000 s uare feet for the clubhouse facility. Parcel 1 is governed by the additional following requirements. i. Pedestrian interconnection to access Parcel 2 and Prope& immediately to the west must be pursued by the goperly owner, and incorporated into the overall site design. ii. Vehicular interconnection with Parcel 2 is re uired , particularly to provide southbound traffic direct egress onto Airport Road. Vehicular use areas buildings and structures landscape buffering and open space and other uses shall be designed in such a manner that does not impede or interfere with access to or from the adiacent parcel to the south [words underlined have been added/words stR gh have been deleted) Exhibit A CPSS- 2011 -1 Future Land Use Element [Page 62] C. Urban Commercial District 11. Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict This Subdistrict consists of two parcels comprising approximately 10 acres and is located on the southwest comer of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. This Subdistrict allows for existing institutional uses, such as the Italian American Club clubhouse or another social or fraternal organization, future institutional uses for a school, and limited commercial, professional and general offices, and similar uses to serve the nearby community, along with senior housing in the form of an assisted living facility, continuing care retirement center, or other similar housing for the elderly. Development intensity for this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 74,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions, schools, professional, medical and general offices, adult and child day care, personal and business services, and a maximum of 20,000 square feet for the clubhouse facility, all of which uses are allowed by right or by conditional use in the C -1 Zoning District, as identified in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04- 41, as amended. Uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning of each parcel to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties. Any senior housing facility is not subject to this square footage limitation but must meet all other provisions in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, in effect as of the effective date of this amendment. /O"N The development of this Subdistrict shall be governed by the following criteria: a. Rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development and must contain development standards to ensure that all uses will be compatible with neighboring residential and institutional uses. s. b. Parcel 1 This approximately 5 -acre parcel is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. This parcel is limited to a maximum of 34,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions, schools, professional, medical and general offices, and personal and business services, in addition to a maximum of 20,000 square feet for the clubhouse facility. Parcel 1 is governed by the additional, following requirements: Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted Exhibit A CPSS- 2011 -1 n i. Pedestrian interconnection to access Parcel 2 and property immediately to the west must be pursued by the property owner, and incorporated into the overall site design. ii. Vehicular interconnection with Parcel 2 is required, particularly to provide southbound traffic direct egress onto Airport Road. Vehicular use areas, buildings and structures, landscape buffering and open space, and other uses shall be designed in such a manner that does not impede or interfere with access to or from the adjacent parcel to the south. iii. The existing easternmost vehicular access drive onto Orange Blossom Drive shall be removed or permanently closed -off by the property owner prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any further development or redevelopment of the site. iv. Development within Parcel 1 shall have common site, signage and building architectural elements, including on -site signs directing motorists toward southbound egress through Parcel 2 onto Airport Road. "b" above if it G2-A that the ItFanspeFtatien imparts of the faG!I;ty do not impmvernents d- c. Parcel 2 This approximately 5 -acre parcel is located on the west side of Airport Road, approximately 330 feet south of the intersection of Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive. This parcel is limited to a maximum of 40,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions, professional, medical and general offices, adult and child day care, personal and business services, and an assisted living facility, continuing care retirement center, or other similar housing for the elderly. Parcel 2 is governed by the additional, following requirements: L Pedestrian interconnection to access Parcel 1 and properties immediately to the south and to the west must be pursued by the property owner, and incorporated into the overall site design. ii. Vehicular interconnection with Parcel 1 is required, particularly to provide eastbound traffic direct egress onto Orange Blossom Drive. Vehicular use areas, buildings and structures, landscape buffering and open space, and other uses shall be designed in such a manner that does not impede or interfere with access to or from the adjacent parcel to the north. iii. Development within Parcel 2 shall have common site, signage and building architectural elements, including on -site signs directing motorists toward northbound egress through Parcel 1 onto Orange Blossom Drive. 2 Words underlined are added; words stFUsk thmugh are deleted L EXHIBITA PETITION CP- 2DD6-07 /CP- 20D6 -p8 ORANGE BLOSSOM /AIRPORT CROSSROADS COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT D� COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 0 I I S�=- °8' LEGEND -� PREPARED BY, GRAPACS ANO TECHNICAL SVPPORT S= CTIpr7 { --yR`f I ® COMMUNITY DE*,ELOPMENT AND ENVIP.ONMENTAL SERA " D�'vit!01q r --i --1 DATE; 9/2008 FILE: CP- 2606— C ?B.0'*YG a wa rr ioao rr Print Map Page 1 of 1 Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict •�i F A A MAP LEGEND - ' - a Street Names 'r ❑ Parcels - _ IL7 Subdivisions �.� 44 Aerials 201116 Inch Urbanj '��' Aertaig.2009 12 F 71 - `�� .: ` g " 1, ' S ❑ Bullding Footprints s _ I p ❑ Cower County AF 4tzy °i16 �ip Ra 9 g s - -�- MF - it 3 _ - �' `€ `- - �` • Folio Number. 00238000005 Name: CORRADI AIRPORT INC iJ z Street# & Name: 6925 AIRPORT RD Ems., rs r. 1"F q N Legal Description: 2 49 25 COMM AT SE CNR OF SEC 2, N 2DEG W Y 1708.1 OFT, S 89DEG W 100.07FT W R/W SR 31 AND POB, S 89DEG W _ _ c: 660FT, N C 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up- to-date information, no warrantes expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. http:// www. collierappraiser. comlwebmaplmapprint.aspx?title= Orange %20BIossomlAirp... 11/14/2011 W ra LJ V) z Z; ci U T) ri U U F E E- U E E - X E_ F. E_ U U U U U , w 14 W:W,: z Z, I� w Z:21 I I Y' '>e =v ZA41 6 I NEU IM z zi m g%)Julalulm mjU mjU m Ulu U Ulw w UJUJUJUJUJU U UlmlU Ulm miulu njg�jo Qjw -J gi C4 01 0, crmr WC, M M Oc 10 1� R IL ID C14 cl� CL R ct �t ct _"C4" �_C14_Nr4__ rq fl- In , , fD CT; arilco "r 0 cn I M 'o V4 I- K -Mr co N F-_ co "r . ka r_: o M U> CID CD N 1i; co 0 llls Ti N TV I v M co co N. 01 ID, N CR 4 C14 _0L 0 'o 4 • 1 M 'i T 1 M cil I N N M 11� M - z Z -ilukww ; w w; W:;4 w w WIZ z z z w zjzjz z zjz z z z z zjzj. z w! w Br V w ICY" - - ;1 2 I C� C> 10 1 'h ''an - "I" - 'o - I cq 15 Ij Ic"A +v 10 101� R Cq 10 C".41 C4 C-4 • 10 OLI -d! -2Z Aa 0 A o zt4 7� o4 !4 0 Ki W4 i .54 _0 oa 7-1 cl Ali �4 T V2 T-6it �a 0 =-0 U > 0. a ta Q > soe ta -5 o a > > 38 > 7§ A > R] 18 0 15 0 a F- T-_ > P, A 1z; mig > 0 P. AIL, A '79 C> > 3 P, tilt 9.0 1 F 0 1- 1 1 .0 c la �g ON MRS M T1 t MIMMMMM M v w A W� 0 0 0 0 0 0 wl'im m m M LAW s 0 6 g c . V V V v m C5 0 0 0 a 0 R i1i Jv- 111- 0 0 0 i5 a® - o S 73 S o a 000 'S UUuuiU U U U U u a an .15 m__Weo U 04 - i 0 � U . . . ',� ; '� il 40 6. ;� C41 - WPWW g� OP-iii U U U U U U U U U U U U, C� -d" IN C� 6 'o 17, 1=1 C� e�i O C, C, a, 0, I " N cq N N . lie re 1�e Ine Ine n� m' U u LU) U'5 U u uuu u L) L) U u u I UUC)U u U IR IR lc� ::� -.i� c� q cR q q . lc� c� 6 IT — t-i 00''01. z" -4 " - -It d " ol w - I - ol C� I - (;; I I " I'a - I , - m � -1 w w w c. ch a a, ch (71 u L), 2 U�- 1 U L u F- F, F lz 2 z L) U L) u u 4 z. :r� vl� L L IW C.1 Q g U UJUIMIMIUjul MI MIUIUIUIUIMIMI GAUW AAUggU W GAtCAwoa W UUPaPGOam W MIMI= milm, m ,,p c, C"i I iwig� • -1 I - wf; - T� - �!! C'! �P "t -It XGZ�� M - � -W, - , w " - � � 10. ;i I , E P" r4 i.4 N._ F eq C4 CA •C-4 -1�! C7, 00 C> a, 'ra.. ol t- t-lc� Ol 10 T! U'-) ztya C4 Tomi ADF� :Z to -UD') N. C3. 3-: w; T: (D co co co 4 CD co C� co I- CD r.. w CD (D VCDVO C14: CIO to znl . -1 cq" C4 Cq 03 11clIcIv- !I O eq r r 4 CD 10 0 m C"4 - - - - o. O. C> N a, 'D 0, 'o 0 0 CT� C - -1 1� R A 0 IS Cl 0-1 - - - 2 HI , Z,-: P-1 -1 I 1 1 ld e7 an ITI I- C-4 I k, =:==H4w = w w = z m 1 7.17.. z z Z,= zzzw 74 WM W'.1 w w W WjZjZjZjZjZjZjZjZj3j-j-j-j 41 w w L4 w a w w 0 q m m Q q w w w w 0 AAgAW W W W W W ggAAAqAA L) Ujujuju UIL)IWI 12, LI 0 Q A (21 Q Q a �D �D D 'L*01 10 rq 'D I-D 'r Nr It 7 0 7 10 a 10 rq C4 ,A N 10 10 `0 iD 10 ry 7�9 Z !J's i 5 A - . A I -Ei >AR, 0 I 7j, �E -0 0 Z5 -0 1D 0 75 9 o =it 0 3 > 0, -z m '6 _5 C, C, a, 0, I " N cq N N . lie re 1�e Ine Ine n� m' U u LU) U'5 U u uuu u L) L) U u u I UUC)U u U IR IR lc� ::� -.i� c� q cR q q . lc� c� 6 IT — t-i 00''01. z" -4 " - -It d " ol w - I - ol C� I - (;; I I " I'a - I , - m � -1 w w w c. ch a a, ch (71 a M w C 5 a F m Cl) V R cO N n m co b m co Ily N O ry v O OD 711 O N O ^ tp O O O n Y +e- Tom. N O'. s0: [ir < uY an st m- N at: yD' ✓�; 7 , » an Ci> N N Ni —1 ., N! YV; 3V, F ° a0� �m.:o0, In v' �n OD Yt �p T in m .-+ m N m .+ .-i C, c N l n m m - � O a �n�n000000 �000000 o'n000000000000OOO � dnnoNncvi _ ':.no,NVi�vonv,�o'nN'. ..00000 `a ! M! •m' *n > aZ , Z 2 u1 izt w itl na ! : 7xt, ; i l w iv oil: w w w w v-1 z U U w w w w w w w w w w g w q q w w w q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q �� m r •>D; +O; V �: xRIV: ' m V' +D �° II. mo a: c0 :00 .-+ O.' �n �7 t 'N •N v� .. VI 4D r iD, •C°! N: et v; Y+) .•+ 'V 'vl' :N! Off, A::OV. 'C; ID', 4 ;D IN,N v,�7o- S >>wcav�'wquwgnc D 3q m. m i!: mi . R': r3: a m 4m U, m: is5 m: w m t°S. - u�vwr�e -.c� "a��'3v >z wac_i3wa w.:� b o v o v v sa� -a noar>:o .'' LEI x m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m w z 2 2 z z z z z C R m m m m >> fx° a v> m A a� u as a� u C.. 'C �. '0 m m' 1 F a. ti v i! t� Yq i.A Sri: 4T L9 i]' p aAapa.n x w-- C�C7 � �' a,v- o- ovvvv -o „°�33'33v -o o-ov Ft,E' >33'3'0000c��aaw v v v a Doi ao m m. m' ao m�ol rn rq � m rn •�: � rn �: v�: m: rn aaaaaa��aaa vvvUVUVV v vvv v a, a; e. a s o� �o �o a- o a a o: a .-. �N .•, 'N a' a� a a' a�'o a' o a o a o 0 0 0 0 H.�..n. �. •O. i N Ni! t' rh! •\D mi -a. �1 ^,. -�,', �! '�: '�! ^. LDI 'O\O "--'� 2V. rt+l ' Y h N sn R a, O, a 0, CIO ATTACHMENT 8b� o yq•f,y, a T 1.fL z U' :O d7f J � VANDERBILY ti CARD �" °Z � • I— no GOLDEN GATE BLVD Z w •,+ 896 " "1R Z m¢., °GREEN w Q JC,ateO 16TH AVE SW " } `O U ❑ , ? „1 GdkBEWp ATE PKWY 41 a�, m 17 ,j RIO RD M C � "5: ,. E. !llFpp� 54TH AVE SE 55TH AVE SE ? o DAVIS BLVD' 60TH AVE SE O 1 N 68TH AVE SE z - n v� RATTLESNAKE SABAL PALM RD P HAMMOCK RD ❑ ,� O J 9 N ��F'. J m z m i m w z 0 U. ❑ O LIJ E _,I J (D ✓� 3 f 1y, 116TH AVE SE +T Tqy 122ND AVE SE ,IStIi��.., LYNCH BLVD Percentage Change In Peak Dour Directional Il/olume From 2010 i Growth Management Division Transportation Planning Department Legend Percentage Change In Peak Hour { Directional Volume From 2010 �� ,_,•,,, IMMOKALEE R E <10% Decrease From 2010 10 % <20% Decrease From 2010 84 >20 °/G Decrease From 2010 49RD AVE I NW No Significant Change From 2010 " 5 °m• `� 41ST AVE , t ' a-• 55.. r J OIL WELL RD OIL WELL RD <10% Increase From 2010 aF (" 10 % <20% Increase From 2010 IMMOK LEE FD �'-� x�.; 4O t 1 RRANNDDALL�LVD rT- 0 16TH AVE NE° 10TH AVE NE a >20% Increase From 2010 Under Construction 8b� o yq•f,y, a T 1.fL z U' :O d7f J � VANDERBILY ti CARD �" °Z � • I— no GOLDEN GATE BLVD Z w •,+ 896 " "1R Z m¢., °GREEN w Q JC,ateO 16TH AVE SW " } `O U ❑ , ? „1 GdkBEWp ATE PKWY 41 a�, m 17 ,j RIO RD M C � "5: ,. E. !llFpp� 54TH AVE SE 55TH AVE SE ? o DAVIS BLVD' 60TH AVE SE O 1 N 68TH AVE SE z - n v� RATTLESNAKE SABAL PALM RD P HAMMOCK RD ❑ ,� O J 9 N ��F'. J m z m i m w z 0 U. ❑ O LIJ E _,I J (D ✓� 3 f 1y, 116TH AVE SE +T Tqy 122ND AVE SE ,IStIi��.., LYNCH BLVD Percentage Change In Peak Dour Directional Il/olume From 2010 i Growth Management Division Transportation Planning Department TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 13881 PLANTATION ROAD, SUITE 11 FORT MYERS, FL 3391211339 OFFICE 239.278.3090 FAX 239.278.1906 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN TO: Mr. Michael Greene Collier County Transportation Planning FROM: Robert L. Price, PE Senior Transportation Consultant Ted B. Treesh President DATE: September 9, 2008 RE: Airport- Pulling Rd @ Orange Blossom Dr Intersection Improvements Traffic Projections Collier County, Florida TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. has been retained by the Developers of the Italian American Club Comprehensive Plan and the Westminster PUD to assess the necessary future lane arrangements at the intersection of Airport- Pulling Road/Orange Blossom Drive to accommodate future growth, specifically planned and/or approved projects that are in the general vicinity of the subject intersection. Figure 1 indicates the location of the subject intersection as well as the developments that were accounted for as a part of this analysis. Also indicated within Figure 1 are the intensities of each development. In order to perform the requested analysis, TR Transportation has completed a 2013 analysis at this location. The traffic projections in this memorandum will be utilized to perform the needs analysis for the intersection. The 2013 traffic projections are based on A.M. and P.M. peak hour turning movement counts performed by TR Transportation. Existing Traffic Data A turning movement count was conducted at the intersection of Airport Pulling Road/Orange Blossom Drive during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours (7AM -9AM & 4PM- 6PM) on January 8, 2008. Furthermore, upon the request of the Collier County Transportation Planning Department, turning movement counts were also performed at the nearest signalized intersection to the north (Emerald Lakes Drive /Old Groves Road) TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Mr. Michael Greene Collier County Transportation Planning Airport Pulling Rd @ Orange Blossom Dr Improvements September 10, 2008 Page 3 and south (J & C Boulevard/Fountain View Circle) of Orange Blossom Drive on Airport Pulling Road on May 7, 2008 and May 8, 2008. These turning movement counts were adjusted for peak season traffic conditions based on the information contained within the 2007 Peak Season Factor Category spreadsheet within the 2007 FDOT Traffic Information CD as can be found in the Appendix of this document. The January 8, 2008 count was adjusted by a peak season correction factor of 1.12 while the May 7th and May 8t' counts were adjusted by a peak season correction factor of 1.17. The turning movement count results can be found within the Appendix of this document for reference. Additionally, a graphical representation of the 2008 peak season turning movement counts is shown in Figure 2. A peak hour factor (PHF) was calculated based on the results of the turning movement counts performed at the various intersections. The appropriate PHF's will be utilized throughout the remainder of the intersection analysis. A separate PHF was calculated for each intersection based on both the AM and PM peak hours in accordance with the calculation indicated below for Airport Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Road in the AM peak hour. PHF = Highest Hourly Volume 4 *Highest 15 Minute Volume _ 2,999 vehicles _ 2,999 vehicles PHFAM 4 * 790 vehicles 3,160 vehicles PHF,m = 0.949 In addition to the peak hour factor, a 2% truck percentage was assumed in order to account for heavy vehicles at the intersection. Table 1 indicates the resultant peak hour factors and the truck percentage utilized at each intersection as a part of the proposed analysis. Table I PHF & Truck % Airport Pulling Road Orange Blossom Drive Intersection Improvements Airport Pulling Rd @ Old 0.926 0.893 2% Groves Rd/Emerald Lakes Dr Airport Pulling Rd @ Orange 0.949 0.979 2% Blossom Dr Airport Pulling Rd @ J &C 0.962 0.861 2% Blvd/Fountain View Cir TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Mr. Michael Greene Collier County Transportation Planning Airport Pulling Rd @ Orange Blossom Dr Improvements September 10, 2008 Page 5 Future Development Traffic In order to determine the 2013 buildout turning movements at the subject intersection, the projected traffic to be generated as a part of the various developments in the vicinity of the Airport- Pulling Road/Orange Blossom Drive intersection was combined based on the information contained within the Traffic Impact Studies obtained for each project. The various projects for which the traffic was accounted can be found within Figure 1 contained previously in this document. A brief description of each development and the approved parameters associated with those developments are included below, listed from west to east. Savannah Place RPUD is a 5.82 -acre parcel located on the south side of Orange Blossom Drive approximately % mile to the west of Airport Pulling Road. This development is currently being reviewed for a potential re- zoning that would allow for up to 20 single family dwelling units. The TIS performed for this re- zoning application by Q. Grady Minor & Associates, PA was obtained in order to account for the traffic generated as a result of this development. Attached in the Appendix of this document is - -- - }� _.. — pporti�g- doeUri1w2tati ff� �� e—t L gener�tteri ands � ntai�e - within the re- zoning TIS for the Savannah Place RPUD. This information was utilized in order to perform an assignment of the Savannah Place RPUD trips to the subject intersection as well as the signalized intersection on Airport Pulling Road to the north and south of Orange Blossom Drive. Access to Orange Blossom Drive was shown via a �— single, full access location along the frontage of the Savannah Place RPUD. Figure 3 was created to illustrate the Savannah Place RPUD traffic accounted for at the area intersections as a part of the proposed needs analysis at the Airport Pulling Road/Orange Blossom Drive intersection. Italian American Plaza & Clubhouse District is a 5 -acre parcel Iocated in the southwest corner of the intersection of Airport Pulling Road and Orange Blossom Drive. This development is currently being reviewed for a potential Comprehensive Plan Amendment that would allow for a 20,000 square foot fraternal lodge/organization, 22,500 square feet of general office space, 7,500 square feet of medical office space, and a 4,000 square foot drive -in bank. TR Transportation Consultants performed the TIS for this Comprehensive Plan Amendment. As such, the trip generation projections from the TIS for the Italian American Plaza & Clubhouse District have been attached in the Appendix of this document for reference. Access to the subject property was proposed via two {2} locations. An existing full access to Orange Blossom Drive was shown in addition to a right - in/right -out access to Airport Pulling Road via a cross access through a neighboring parcel to the south of the subject site. Figure 4 has been created to illustrate the Italian American Plaza & Clubhouse District traffic at the area intersections analyzed as a part of this needs analysis Airport Road /Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict is a 5 -acre parcel located on the west side of Airport Pulling Road to the south of the Italian American Plaza & Clubhouse District. This development is currently being reviewed for a potential Ow O vP� O �v ♦20 %-► BOULEVARD ♦ 5% z a 00 �< O 35% 5 F a 2�-a *- 0 (0) O O F O (0) (0) 01 �1 + (0)0,,� (0) ON a'o° 355% v`' o Z..O (0) T t- o ♦o (0) (4) 4 '4N (0)0 -► oU')o (o) o.� �o N 300% a =a k0 (0) !-0 (0) oo cNV o ♦4 (3) r 41 (33) , / j 5 {3} co {36) 8 14)16 vT (10)3 Noo (� .✓ T (0) 0 A/ l • _ .__.� (36) 8-. rn N co N� NO A/ l • _ .__.� (36) 8-. rn N ORANGE BLOSSOM /A ROAD -4-10 %♦ FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE Arm LEGEND ♦20 %-► PERCENT DISTRIBUTION f-- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ♦ (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ITALIAN AMERICAN PLAZA AND CLUBHOUSE DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION NET NEW SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT CONSULTANTS, INC ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Figure 4 z z °- (*:E O Lif O N.T.S. 35 °0 ti s Zo (0) MN a 4-0(0) (0} 0 -t` �`1 � f �o�a o O {0 0 O) 0� o Lo o o m 0 l 35% C= 300% 1 o o k0(0) 0 00 0 -4-0 (0) ARD 4/ + Ir 0 (0) (0) 01' h + ? (0) 0 ° (0) 0.,� o vN � �41 (36) 0 n �o �0 (0) �81 (8 (0) 0-0114\ 1* (45) 9 ' 1 (11)14 (26) (3 NOO (0) 0 00 t `° _ o —,- _411+ ~ (38) 8 + ti N ORANGE O S M ROAD *-20% FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE j LEGEND {1 A- -20 %-► PERCENT DISTRIBUTION ♦ 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC �- / -(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AIRPORT ROAD/ ORANGE BLOSSOM COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT TRANSPORTATION NET NEW SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Figure 5 I,--, 1 O v ♦ 10% -0- BOULEVARD ♦ 5% -► cl) ~9 (50) 4-2 (12) 9`(49) z (0) J ooCCD O O J CL 0f 0 CL Q Ly O Q Ir- 40% J vo k0 o (0) 1 L, s 0 (0) (0) 0--- -1 T (0) ID -I- I o rn o (0) 0-. 000 �v� 4 400 OPD S� Off" o o N ♦01►�T� ~9 (50) 4-2 (12) 9`(49) (0) (9) 7 (°) Q ooCCD O O t 40% T co vc 3 (4) I,-rl- 4-0(0) T'`►r °(0)* -5% (5) 4 J' T 0 ) 0 �No � N (0) 0 u 300% T ORANGE B t-10 %♦ "ftle' --] N\ v . 8 (12) % �-0 (0) (105)72--- (0) 0-► SSOM ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE LEGEND ♦20 %-► PERCENT DISTRIBUTION -4-- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ♦(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC LONGVIEW CENTER PUD NORTH PARCEL TRANSPORTATION SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Figure 7 Mr. Michael Greene TRANSPORTATION Collier County Transportation Planning Airport Pulling Rd @ Orange Blossom Dr Improvements CONSULTANTS, INC. September 10, 2008 Page 13 Greek Orthodox Church is a vacant parcel on the north side of Orange Blossom Drive on the eastern boundary of the Longview Center development previously discussed within this document. Based on potential development parameters for the site, it was assumed to consist of a maximum of 20 multi - family dwelling units. Currently, a TIS has not been performed for this future development. As such, trip generation calculations were performed based on Land Use Code 230 (Residential Condominium/Townhouse) within the ITE Trip Generation Report, 7rh Edition. Table 2 reflects the trip generation of the potential development. Table 2 Trip Generation Greek Orthodox Church Parcel Access to the site was assumed via a single location to Orange Blossom Drive. Figure 9 reflects the distribution utilized for the analysis as well as the site traffic assignment to the various intersections studied as a part of this document. Westminster is a currently vacant parcel on the north side of Orange Blossom Drive on the eastern boundary of the Greek Orthodox Church parcel previously discussed within this document. The Developer of the Westminster development is currently in the process of gathering the necessary data to submit a PUD re- zoning application on the site. The PUD re- zoning will propose a 415 unit Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) on the subject site. Currently, a TIS has not been performed for this future development. As such, trip generation calculations were performed based on Land Use Code 255 (CCRC) within the ITE Trip Generation Report, 74h Edition. Table 3 reflects the trip generation of the potential development. Table 3 Trip Generation Westminster PUD �xt, �� `.� rye �.fS. `$'T6�Ja+r idd°'�. ;��,.•�q�� - 3 © ��_T`1.* t'�S��, S2�kr�,�l: ��,�1SS`;`. 4' ? r 3� -1 }lL��'�. l,tf •� e �� i7 . ,�� . � � c� � �r..,��z Multi - Family 14— T ( we n units -�- Access to the site was assumed via a single location to Orange Blossom Drive. Figure 9 reflects the distribution utilized for the analysis as well as the site traffic assignment to the various intersections studied as a part of this document. Westminster is a currently vacant parcel on the north side of Orange Blossom Drive on the eastern boundary of the Greek Orthodox Church parcel previously discussed within this document. The Developer of the Westminster development is currently in the process of gathering the necessary data to submit a PUD re- zoning application on the site. The PUD re- zoning will propose a 415 unit Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC) on the subject site. Currently, a TIS has not been performed for this future development. As such, trip generation calculations were performed based on Land Use Code 255 (CCRC) within the ITE Trip Generation Report, 74h Edition. Table 3 reflects the trip generation of the potential development. Table 3 Trip Generation Westminster PUD �xt, �� `.� rye �.fS. `$'T6�Ja+r idd°'�. ;��,.•�q�� - 3 © ��_T`1.* t'�S��, S2�kr�,�l: ��,�1SS`;`. 4' ? r 3� -1 }lL��'�. l,tf •� e �� i7 . ,�� . � � c� � �r..,��z Access to the site was assumed via a single location to Orange Blossom Drive. Figure 10 reflects the distribution utilized for the analysis as well as the site traffic assignment to the various intersections studied as a part of this document. CW+ z_ J .J a_ cr- O p p T N.T.S, 30% �S�OPO o =o k0 (0) p� 010 .4-0(0) �OG� (a)°.?h +t* (0)0-' vv� 0 30% 00('o t-H (17) �� N 0 0 ♦5 (12) jN ORANGE BLOSSOM ♦20 °I °♦ �y �S (18) !�' ( ROAD {11) 10-x► °Or (0)0 -► (0)0� ao-- t 300% o o Z0 (0) 0� o -4-0 (0) BOULEVARD r ♦ 1 `► 1 ° (0) FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE (0) 0.? ? * (0) 0-.0 o � o (0) ON oG:�o LEGEND ♦20 %♦ PERCENT DISTRIBUTION f-- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ♦(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC WESTMINSTER TRANSPORTATION SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT CONSULTANTS, INC. ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Figure 10 J &C BOULEVARD c� z a O p IL O Q tr (110) 41 -/ �'A T (77) 45 ♦ ru-, °° Mo (1) 3 o� o �v .�N 12 (18) 1--0 (0) (33) 21 (0)0♦ (0)0-% ° P� �O C6 FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE LEGEND -4-- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC . ♦ (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N.T.S. C��B T[� TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC SUMMARY fi CONSULTANTS INC. ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS FI ure 11 v ti ) (0 . ON t-0 O ( °) °� ado o� C (0)0.. CD M V 1V �Nr co N N N r L= tt-) r, = 84 (22003) .1 1 1. r60 (176) (110) 41 -/ �'A T (77) 45 ♦ ru-, °° Mo (1) 3 o� o �v .�N 12 (18) 1--0 (0) (33) 21 (0)0♦ (0)0-% ° P� �O C6 FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE LEGEND -4-- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC . ♦ (000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N.T.S. C��B T[� TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC SUMMARY fi CONSULTANTS INC. ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS FI ure 11 c7 z N J J d W E d Q Q S N.T.S. N p o k34 (32) Cr T V 107 (1 �` ♦ `► Opp (78) 621 (8)2 -0 It�� (57) 71 r ° rn o O �ti �v T N Co 103 (133) CD -4-220 (146) ORANGE BLOSSOM r 371 (186) ROAD (220) 1161 t 1+ (490) 310♦ (,o rn (354) 251 , r co ^ �VN Cl �- 117 vT N N M rn� Z43 (38) 4-8 (4) J &C BOULEVARD `% + y''54 (42) FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE (338) 1591 *N + t* (226)120-. °' o rnT� co rn I FrFNn ♦ 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 4- -(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC TRANSPORTATION 2013 BACKGROUND TURNING MOVEMENTS CONSULTANTS, INC.ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS Figure 12 Mr. Michael Greene TRANSPORTATION Collier County Transportation Planning Airport Pulling Rd @ Orange Blossom Dr Improvements CONSULTANTS, INC. September 10, 2008 Page 21 Based on the attached plan, both the eastbound approach and the westbound approach to Airport Pulling Road on Orange Blossom Drive will consist of dual left turn lanes, a single through lane, and a separate right turn lane. A preliminary cost estimate was also created in order to reflect the potential costs necessary to perform the intersection improvements currently projected as a part of this analysis. This cost estimate has been attached to the end of this document for reference. Upon Staff approval of the projections contained within this document, the SYNCHRO files will be finalized, and a final report will be completed. At such time, another meeting will be held With Staff to go through the finalized SYNCHRO model in order to discuss the necessary improvements. Should you have any questions or concerns about the data contained within this document, please do not hesitate to contact me. Appendix /Attachments APPENDIX I--- TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: January 8, 2008 DAY: TUESDAY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR AIRPORT ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS HOUR BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION F_ LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT AIRPORT ROAD & ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD TOTAL TOTAL 7:30 AM H 88 662 72 822 31 1,065 124 1,220 81 .216 175 AIRPORT ROAD AIRPORT ROAD 2,999 36 1,246 145 INTER - ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD 552 NORTHBOUND INTER - 15 MIN EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND SOUTHBOUND LEFT EASTBOUND RIGHT WESTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 37 146 26 209 6 248 14 266 9 23 102 134 52 16 11 79 690 7:15 AM 23 149 17 IB9 4 236 18 258 10 43 39 92 63 25 15 103 642 7:30 AM 19 150 22 191 11 255 2B 304 16 75 43 134 61 28 11 100 729 7:45 AM 15 153 15 183 11 292 23 326 13 74 35 122 75 38 22 135 766 8:00 AM 24 195 17 237 7 251 33 291 34 42 43 119 70 49. 24 143 790 6:15 AM 30 163 18 211 2 257 40 299 10 25 54 97 53 39 15 107 714 8:30 Atd 27 155 13 195 15 282 37 334 21 31 33 85 38 50 it 99 13 H:45 AM 33 142 5 160 8 259 34 301 27 30 51 106 41 24 11 76 [465 TOTAL: 208 1.254 133 1,595 64 2,090 227 2,381 148 343 400 691 453 269 120 842 709 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR AIRPORT ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS HOUR BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION EASTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT AIRPORT ROAD & ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:30 AM H 88 662 72 822 31 1,065 124 1,220 81 .216 175 AIRPORT ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD 2,999 36 1,246 145 INTER - HOUR HOUR 552 NORTHBOUND 567 1 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 94 598 60 772 32 1,D41 83 1,15fi 48 215 219 482 251 107 59 417 2,827 7:15 AM 81 648 71 800 33 1,D44 102 1,179 73 234 160 467 269 140 72 481 2,927 7:30 AM BB 662 72 822 31 1,D65 124 1,220 81 216 175 472 259 154 72 485 2,999 7:45 AM 95 667 63 B26 35 1,082 133 1,250 86 172 165 423 236 176 72 484 2,983 8:00 AM 114 656 53 823 32 1,D49 144 1,225 t00 128 181 409 202 162 61 425 2,882 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR AIRPORT ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTER - HOUR BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION EASTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:30 AM H 88 662 72 822 31 1,065 124 1,220 81 .216 175 472 259 154 72 485 2,999 PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = 1.17 ) HOUR AIRPORT ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTER - BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7730 AM 103 775 84 962 36 1,246 145 1,427 95 253 205 552 303 180 84 567 1 3,509 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: January 8, 2008 DAY: TUESDAY COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS AIRPORT ROAD & ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTER' AIRPORT ROAD INTER - HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS BOUND EASTBO UND WESTBOUND ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD BOUND BEGIN RIGHT TOTAL RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL WESTBOUND SECTION 15 MIN µpRTHBOUND AIRPORT ROAD & ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL 9 274 311 313 LEFT THRU RIGHT 35 53 67 TOTAL 155 47 20 13 80 994 INTER - 84 446 4:00 PM 42 320 EASTBOUND 35 B7 50 172 43 25 19 87 1,029 4:15 PM 55 351 69 475 14 256 25 295 57 171 23 19 23 65 1,016 4:30 PM 43 357 95 495 19 244 22 285 42 72 51 146 24 16 27 67 1,652 4:45 PM 54 370 88 512 22 279 26 327 37 58 57 189 34 29 17 80 1,083 5:00 PM 50 367 137 554 14 227 19 260 41 91 63 192 32 20 28 80 1,100 5:15 PM 64 406 67 537 18 240 33 291 39 90 73 990 1D0 1,153 1,753 40 37 21 98 1,109 5:30 PM 67 339 174 520 17 229 29 275 37 103 76 216 31 25 21 77 1,031 5:45 PM 48 329 98 475 11 263 22 296 34 81 68 635 489 183 1,424 274 191 1fi9 634 8,414 TOTAL: 423 2,839 752 4,014 124 2,012 206 2,342 300 60 959 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = IA7 ) AIRPORT ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD jj1j1R INTER - HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS BOUND EASTBO UND WESTBOUND ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD BOUND BEGIN RIGHT TOTAL RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:45 PM 4Dfi 2,123 71 975 107 1,753 154 342 247 743 130 102 93 325 4,344 AIRPORT ROAD & ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL AIRPORT ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD 83 1,141 125 1,349 INTER - HOUR 152 119 109 380 5,082 EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4,091 4,180 LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU 64 1,053 103 1,220 149 270 225 644 155 308 215 678 137 8D B2 299 124 59 86 299 4:00 PM 194 1,398 336 1,928 4:15 PM 202 1,445 389 2,036 69 1,006 92 1,167 159 311 228 698 713 64 95 292 4,251 4:30 PM 211 1,500 387 2,098 73 990 1D0 1,153 1,753 154 342 247 743 130 102 93 325 4,344 4:45 PM 235 1,482 406 2,123 71 975 107 103 1,122 151 355 264. 780 137 111 87 4,323 5:00 PM 229 1,441 416 2,086 60 959 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = IA7 ) AIRPORT ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD jj1j1R INTER - HOUR BOUND EASTBO UND WESTBOUND ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD BOUND BEGIN RIGHT TOTAL RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:45 PM 4Dfi 2,123 71 975 107 1,753 154 342 247 743 130 102 93 325 4,344 '"IY. PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = IA7 ) AIRPORT ROAD ORANGE BLOSSOM ROAD INTER - HOUR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 4:45 PM 275 1,734 475 2,484 83 1,141 125 1,349 180 400 289 869 152 119 109 380 5,082 '"IY. TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: May 7, 2008 DAY: WEDNESDAY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS AIRPORT PULLING ROAD OLD GROVES ROAD I EMERALD LAKE DRIVE INTER - 1992 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AIRPORT PULLING ROAD & OLD GROVES ROAD / EMERALD LAKE DRIVE SECTION SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU AIRPORT PULLING ROAD TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT OLD GROVES ROAD I EMERALD LAKE DRIVE LEFT THRU RIGHT INTER - 15 MIN 103 NORTHBOUND ROAD SOUTHBOUND 33 INTER - EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 1 13 125 1 139 0 232 2 234 4 1 18 23 7 3 2 12 4DB 7:15 AM 5 168 6 179 1 198 1 200 6 0 5 11 19 1 5 25 416 7:30 AM 9 165 7 181 1 246 5 252 9 0 7 16 24 2 5 31 4BD 7:45 AM 21 225 8 254 3 321 3 327 13 2 10 25 29 2 9 40 646 8:00 AM 25 206 7 238 0 234 5 239 17 0 4 21 30 4 9 43 541 8:15 AM 22 231 6 259 3 279 14 296 9 0 26 35 11 3 2 16 606 8:30 AM 24 208 5 237 2 295 11 3D8 11 0 17 28 17 3 B 28 501 8:45 AM 27 210 13 250 1 4 302 10 316 13 1 20 34 30 4 6 40 640 TOTAL' 146 1,538 53 1,737 14 2,107 51 2,172 82 4 107 193 167 22 47 236 4,338 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS AIRPORT PULLING ROAD OLD GROVES ROAD I EMERALD LAKE DRIVE INTER - 1992 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND AIRPOR -T -PU L-L-ING- ROAD- & -OL-D- GROVES- ROAD -I -E-M E-RAL-D- LAKE -DRIV E SECTION SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 103 AIRPORT PULLING ROAD OLD GROVES ROAD I EMERALD LAKE DRIVE 33 INTER - HOUR 109 NORTHBOUND 127 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION I BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGLHT_l TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 48 683 22 753 5 997 11 1,013 32 3 40 75 79 8 22 109 1,950 7:15 AM 60 764 28 B52 5 999 14 1,018 45 2 26 73 102 9 29 140 2,083 7:30 AM 77 827 28 932 7 1,D60 27 1,114 48 2 47 97 94 11 25 130 [21273 7:45 AM 92 870 26 988 8 1,129 33 1,170 50 2 57 109 87 12 28 127 2,394 8:00 AM 98 855 31 984 9 1,110 40 1,159 50 1 67 718 88 14 25 127 2,388 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR AIRPORT PULLING ROAD AIRPORT PULLING ROAD OLD GROVES ROAD I EMERALD LAKE DRIVE INTER - 1992 NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 103 670 26 9B8 B 1,129 33 1,170 50 2 57 109 87 12 28 127 2.394 PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = 1.12 j HOUR AIRPORT PULLING ROAD OLD GROVES ROAD I EMERALD LAKE DRIVE INTER - BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT 7H RU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 17:45AMJI 103 974 29 1 1,107 11 9 1,264 37 1,310 N 56 2 64 J__172_jl 97 13 31 1 142 2,681 L� TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: May 7, 2008 DAY: WEDNESDAY COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM - 6:00 PM 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS AIRPORT PULLING ROAD & OLD GROVES ROAD ! EMERALD LAKE DRIVE AIRPORT PULLING ROAD OLD GROVES ROAD I EMERALD LAKE DRIVE INTER - OLD GROVES ROAD 1 EMERALD LAKE DRNE 15 MIN HOUR SOUTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND WESTBOUND BEGIN SECTION BEGIN NORTHBOUND EMERALD LAKE DRIVE TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL ROAD LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT 280 20 1 16 37 23 4 4 6 31 51 719 733 4:OD PM 17 335 19 371 7 262 11 4:15 PM 14 334 26 374 9 257 2 278 18 3 9 30 36 9 6 29 62 1,313 79 1,454 4:30 PM 14 334 20 368 11 229 10 250 19 4 11 34 22 1 5 4 39 662 4:45 PM 17 310 14 341 22 218 10 25D 20 6 fi 32 30 1 9 24 721 5:00 PM 9 361 22 392 3 256 11 272 20 1 12 33 14 2 4 30 1,451 5:15 PM 26 419 18 463 17 257 B 292 16 2 11 29 24 9 44 667 5:30 PM 23 332 10 365 6 223 6 235 12 1 10 23 30 5 4 35 707 5:45 PM 23 339 14 376 3.050 8 249 9 83 1,973 67 266 2,123 15 2 13 140 20 BB 30 248 27 4 206 3l 46 283 5,7D4 TOTAL: 143 2,764 143 PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = IA } PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS AIRPORT PULLING ROAD OLD GROVES ROAD 1 EMERALD LAKE DRNE INTER - HOUR AIRPORT PULLING ROAD & OLD GROVES ROAD / EMERALD LAKE DRIVE SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL Bt 1,457_ 64 1,596 LEFT THRU 34 997 OLD GROVES ROAD ! EMERALD LAKE DRIVE LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL 95 12 26 133 INTER - 5:00 PM THRU RIGHT TOTAL AIRPORT PULLING ROAD TOTAL WESTBOUND 5:00 PM SECTION HOUR BEGIN EASTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND 13 29 LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL 49 976 33 1,058 77 14 42 133 129 111 19 20 102 16 25 150 143 2,795 2,797 4:00 PM 62 1,313 79 1,454 4:15 PM 54 1,339 82 1,475 45 972 33 1,050 77 14 38 90 9 23 122 2,878 4:30 PM 66 1,424 74 1,564 53 972 39 1,064 75 13 40 128 98 13 26 137 2,864 4:45 PM 75 1,422 64 1,561 4B 966 35 1,049 68 10 39 117 115 95 12 26 133 2,909 5:00 PM 61 1,451 64 1,596 34 997 34 1,D65 63 6 46 PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = IA } PEAK HOUR SUMMARY AIRPORT PULLING ROAD OLD GROVES ROAD 1 EMERALD LAKE DRNE INTER - HOUR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL Bt 1,457_ 64 1,596 LEFT THRU 34 997 RIGHT TOTAL 34 1,065 LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL 63 6 46 115 LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL 95 12 26 133 TOTAL 2,909 5:00 PM PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = IA } AIRPORT PULLING ROAD OLD GROVES ROAD t EMERALD LAKE DRIVE INTER - HOUR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 5:00 PM 91 1,825 72 1,788 3H 1,117 38 1,193 71 7 52 --!Lg-jl 106 13 29 1 149 3,258 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: May 8, 2008 DAY: THURSDAY COUNT TIME: 7:00 AM -9:00 AM PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR AIRPORT PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE / J AND C BOULEVARD 15 MINUTE SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION AIRPORT PULLING ROAD & FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE I J AND C BOULEVARD AIRPORT PULLING ROAD & FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE t J AND C BOULEVARD I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE AIRPORT PULLING ROAD 1,004 INTER - FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE 1 J AND C BOULEVARD 230 INTER - 15 MIN SOUTHBOUND NORTHBOUND WESTBOUND SOUTHBOUND SECTION EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:00 AM 25 198 7 230 0 294 35 329 28 2 12 42 7 1 11 19 620 7:15 AM 21 155 0 176 2 276 19 297 27 0 17 44 6 0 7 13 530 7:3D AM 44 184 3 231 2 218 61 261 38 1 15 54 8 3 10 21 587 7:45 AM 32 202 6 240 1 252 39 292 29 0 19 48 11 5 7 23 603 8:00 AM 25 203 4 232 5 233 43 281 31 2 20 53 10 1 8 19 585 8 :15 AM 39 228 8 275 2 219 38 259 31 1 18 50 11 0 9 20 604 8:30 AM 27 224 6 257 3 230 37 270 38 1 40 79 12 0 11 23 629 8:45 AM 43 1 214 5 262 2 2D6 42 250 30 2 37 69 13 1 4 18 599 TOTAL: 256 1,608 39 1,903.11 17 1,928 314 2,259 252 9 178 439 78 11 67 15fi 4,757 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR AIRPORT PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE / J AND C BOULEVARD HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION AIRPORT PULLING ROAD & FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE I J AND C BOULEVARD LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE I J AND C BOULEVARD 1,004 INTER - 1,102 129 4 97 230 NORTHBOUND 2,421 SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 2,712 SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL ES:AIRPORT 122 739 16 677 5 1,040 154 1,199 122 3 63 186 32 9 35 76 2,340 122 744 13 879 10 979 162 1,t51 125 3 71 199 35 8 32 76 2,305 140 B17 21 978 10 922 181 1,113 129 4 72 205 40 9 34 83 2,379 123 857 24 1,004 11 934 157 5,1D2 529 4 97 230 44 6 35 as 2,421 134 869 23 1,026 12 888 160 1.060 130 6 115 251 46 2 32 80 2,417 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOUR AIRPORT PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE / J AND C BOULEVARD INTER - BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION WESTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:45 AM 123 857 24 1,004 11 934 157 1,102 129 4 97 230 44 6 35 85 2,421 PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = 1.12 ) HOUR AIRPORT PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE! J AND C BOULEVARD INTER - BEGIN NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT I TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 7:45 AM 136 960 27 1,124 12 1,046 176 1,234 144 4 109 256 JI 49 7 39 95 2,712 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: May 8, 2009 DAY: THURSDAY COUNT TIME: 4:00 PM - 5:00 PM NUT:ROAD SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS E7A17RPORT ING & FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE / J AND C BOULEVARD HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS AIRPORT PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE I J AND C BOULEVARD ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE I J AND C BOULEVARD WESTBOUND WESTBOUND iNTER- SECTION BEGIN AIRPORT PULLING 15M1N LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 39 1,606 37 1,582 THRU RIGHT T05AL TaAL NORTHBOUND BEGIN LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT 314 69 0 49 TOTAL its LEFT 6 2 5 8 18 745 PM 24 372 10 406 11 265 38 .4:00 4:15 PM 15 328 16 359 8 219 23 250 70 1 47 118 9 1 1 4 13 801 4:30 PM 78 370 7 395 10 239 10 259 80 2 52 134 8 3 7 16 802 4:45 PM 14 366 7 389 7 246 20 273 74 1 49 124 6 0 6 16 727 5:05 PM 11 331 9 351 10 225 9 244 67 3 46 116 10 1 8 15 988 5:15 PM 10 480 12 502 11 331 24 35E 57 3 45 105 6 0 i 52 1,082 75 1,209 5:30 PM 4 427 9 440 18 267 19 3D4 75 1 43 119 12 4 H 788 5:45 PM 8 345 18 371 13 259 23 295 68 2 44 114 4 0 63 B 51 722 6,588 TOTAL: 104 3,021 88 3,213 68 2,051 166 2.305 560 13 375 948 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY HOURLY SUMMARY OF INDIVIDUAL MOVEMENTS AIRPORT PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE I J AND C BOULEVARD INTER - HOUR NORTHBOUND AIRPORT PULLING ROAD & FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE 1 J AND C BOULEVARD WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRll RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE RD 39 1,606 37 1,582 INTER - 72 1,187 273 8 183 464 34 4 30 68 3,401 AIRPORT PULLING ROAD UND 1,799 41 SECTtON HOUR EASTB7GT�T�H HT TOTAL TOTAL NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LE�f THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU 4 5 F32" 62 63 3,201 3,075 4:00 PM 71 1,438 40 1,54 9 35 969 9f i,D96 293 4 4:15 PM 58 1397 39 1,494 35 929 62 1,026 291 7 5 b0 3,318 4:30 PM 53 1,549 35 1,637 3B 1,041 63 1,142 278 9 30 68 3,401 4:45 PM 39 1,606 37 1,682 46 1,069 72 1,187 273 B 27 00 "0 3,387 5:00 PM 33 1,583 4H 1 864 52 1,082 75 1,209 267 9 PEAK HOUR SUMMARY AIRPORT PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE I J AND C BOULEVARD INTER - HOUR NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION BEGIN LEFT THRll RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 39 1,606 37 1,582 46 1,069 72 1,187 273 8 183 464 34 4 30 68 3,401 4:45 PM PEAK SEASON, PEAK HOUR SUMMARY (PSCF = 1.12 ) AIRPORT PULLING ROAD FOUNTAIN VIEW CIRCLE 1 J AND C BOULEVARD INTER- H NORTHBOUND SOUTH8OUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND SECTION RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL LEFT THRU RIGHT TOTAL TOTAL 1,799 41 1,884 52 1,197 81 1,329 11 305 9 205 520 3B 4 34 76 3,809 - -- -09 , FAO -T -' - - -- - - - =C-I FOJ A� =IAN CD - PEAK SEASON CORRECTION FACTORS SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed Savannah Place RPUD is a request for Residential PUD zoning approval of approximately 6.82+ acres for up to 20 Single Family dwelling units. The project site is located on the south side of Orange Blossom Drive approximately !z mile west of Airport Road in Section 2, Township 44 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. For project location please refer to Figure 1, Location Map. The project will have a single entrance to be located on Orange Blossom Drive. Project build out is projected to be 2010. 2.0 SCOPE The following analyses are included in this report: 1. Trip Generation Calculations (at build out) presented For Peak Season Daily Traffic (PSDT) including the Respective Peak Hour Volumes. 2. Trip Assignment within the Radius of Development Influence (RDI). 3.0 TRIP GENERATION The 7th Edition Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) is used for trip generation calculations provided in this report. Please refer to Tables 1 through 12. The trip generation for the previously approved use is estimated to be 87 trip ends for daily traffic volume, 12 trip ends during the AM peak hour and 12 trip ends for the PM peak hour. The trip generation for the proposed use is estimated to be 237 trip ends for daily traffic volume, 23 trip ends during the AM peak hour and 25 trip ends for the PM peak hour. This results in a net increase in trip generation of 150 trip ends for daily traffic volume, 11 trip ends during the AM peak hour and 13 trip ends for the PM peak hour. Please refer to the DISCUSSION section for details concerning the effects of these traffic volumes on the level of service for roadway links within the RDL 4.0 TRIP ASSIGNMENT AND SIGNIFICANCE TEST The project directional distribution of traffic to and from Savannah Place RPUD is presented on Figure 2 and Table 13. When traffic is distributed to the accessed, adjacent and subsequent links, trip generation volumes are below 2% of the service capacity of the surrounding roadways (see Table 14). No roads meet the significance test. F.\PROJ - PLANNING DOCS\.Savannah Piace PUD\SPUDR\Drafts \TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEfvfENT.doe - 2 - FIGURE 3 AM & PM Peak Hour Flow by Direction C IMPACT STATEMENT-d- -6- P APROJ - PLANNR'IG DOCS1Savannah Place PUDISPUDR1Drafts \TRAM TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Table 1 Existing Allowable Use Italian American Plaza and Clubhouse District & Air range Blossom Commercial Subdistrict As a part of this submittal, the Growth Management Plan Amendment for the 5 -acre Italian American Club site will approve a maximum of 54,000 square feet of floor area. More specifically, the site will consist of a 20,000 square foot Italian American Club Chapter in addition to 34,000 square feet of commercial uses. The proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment on the Airport RoadlOrange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict will allow a maximum of 40,000 square feet of commercial floor area on the - e ssuk jest site: r ^- ^rAPT rT -^ f� a warst� ase ar�alv�i- c -in -r- elation to - -the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments, the subject parcels were analyzed based on the uses indicated within Table 2. Table 2 Proposed Maximum Intensities Italian American Plaza and Clubhouse District & Airport Road/Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict vu -. i. ry 1 total dw As a part of this submittal, the Growth Management Plan Amendment for the 5 -acre Italian American Club site will approve a maximum of 54,000 square feet of floor area. More specifically, the site will consist of a 20,000 square foot Italian American Club Chapter in addition to 34,000 square feet of commercial uses. The proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment on the Airport RoadlOrange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict will allow a maximum of 40,000 square feet of commercial floor area on the - e ssuk jest site: r ^- ^rAPT rT -^ f� a warst� ase ar�alv�i- c -in -r- elation to - -the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments, the subject parcels were analyzed based on the uses indicated within Table 2. Table 2 Proposed Maximum Intensities Italian American Plaza and Clubhouse District & Airport Road/Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict The Developer's of both subject parcels have agreed to provide vehicular interconnection between the two (2) sites in order to limit the required access points and provide better. on -site traffic circulation. As such, a full site access driveway is shown to Orange Blossom Road along the western boundary of the Italian American Club site, and a right- Page 5 vu -. i. ry Italian American Plaza and Clubhouse District Italian American Club 20,000 square feet General Office 22,500 square feet Medical Office 7,500 square feet Drive -In Bank 4,000 square feet Total Floor Area 54,000 s care feet Airport Road /Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict General Office 6,000 square feet Medical Office 30,000 square feet Drive -In Bank 4,000 square feet Total Floor Area 40,000 square feet The Developer's of both subject parcels have agreed to provide vehicular interconnection between the two (2) sites in order to limit the required access points and provide better. on -site traffic circulation. As such, a full site access driveway is shown to Orange Blossom Road along the western boundary of the Italian American Club site, and a right- Page 5 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. in/right -out access driveway is shown to Airport Pulling Road on the Airport Road/Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict site. IV. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation calculations were performed for the existing allowable uses in addition to the proposed uses as a part of the Growth Management Plan Amendments on the site. The resultant trip generation for each use was determined by referencing the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) report, titled Trip Generation, 7th Edition. , Land Use Code 230 (Residential Condominium/Townhouse) was utilized for trip generation of the existing allowable uses on the subject parcels. For the Italian American Club site, Land Use Code 591 (Lodge /Fratemal Organization), Land Use Code 710 (General Office ui ng , Land Use o e 720 (Me Ica en a ff�eurlrlg), 912 (Drive -in Bank) were utilized for trip generation purposes. For the Airport Road/Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict, Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building), Land Use Code 720 (Medical/Dental Office Building), and Land Use Code 912 (Drive -in Bank) were utilized in order to perform the trip generation calculations. Table 3 indicates the trip generation of the permitted residential uses on the subject parcels in accordance with the existing Growth Management Plan designation. As the sites are two separate parcels, it was assumed that they could develop as separate residential projects, so trip generation was calculated separately for each parcel based on 15 dwelling units rather than a combined 30 dwelling units. Page 6 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Table 3 Existing Allowable Trip Generation Italian American Plaza and Clubhouse District & z��` t�x.c,�1 '1" "' 6 ie�s [ `]S�_�A , �iiF�•+ iilc 'mitts, ��Y ��W {tlUt, rt [sM�y �F'p,M 1d` x @,S r•.Y c ^'�` s._ up y ice' r. -:'fi• _ ... ., ,��- k?Sl,";��;�F Mail (15 dwelling i1nits Total- • �� I i i Table 4 indicates the trip generation of the proposed Italian American Plaza and Clubhouse District based on the uses listed within Table 2. It should be noted that the average rate was utilized for the PM peak hour calculation for the General Office use and the daily calculation for the Medical Office use. Table 4 Italian American Plaza and Clubhouse District P cad M7vimnrn Trin Cpnp.rnfinn Table 5 indicates the trip generation of the proposed Airport Road/Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict in accordance with the uses listed within Table 2. It should be noted that the average rate was utilized for the PM peak hour trip generation calculation of the General Office use and the daily calculation of the Medical Office use. Page 7 R 1 Lodge/FraternalOrganization 3 3 6 9 9 18 174 (20,000 s . ft.) General Office 50 7 57 6 28 34 424 (22,500 s . ft.) Medical Office 15 4 19 8 20 28 270 (7,500 s . ft.) Drive -In Bank 21 21 49 91 92 183 986 (4,000 sq. ft.) Total Trips 96 35 1 131 114 149 263 1,854 Table 5 indicates the trip generation of the proposed Airport Road/Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict in accordance with the uses listed within Table 2. It should be noted that the average rate was utilized for the PM peak hour trip generation calculation of the General Office use and the daily calculation of the Medical Office use. Page 7 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Table 5 Airport Road /Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict Pronosed Maximum Trip Generation General Office 17 3 20 2 7 9 152 (6,000 s . ft.) Medical Office 59 15 74 28 75 103 1,084 (30,000 s . ft.) Drive -In Bank 28 21 49 91 92 183 986 (4,000 sq. ft.) Total Trips 104 39 143 121 174 295 2,222 ITE estimates that a comparable Drive -in Bank use, such as those proposed on the two subject sites, may attract a significant amount of its traffic from vehicles already traveling the adjoining roadway system. This traffic, called "pass -by" traffic, reduces the development's overall impact on the surrounding roadway system but does not decrease the actual driveway volumes. Collier County allows a maximum "pass -by" traffic reduction of 50% for bank uses. Table 6 summarizes the pass -by reduction. Table 7 summarizes the Italian American Club development traffic and the breakdown between the total project trips and the net new trips the development is anticipated to generate after the pass -by reduction is applied. It should be noted that the driveway volumes are not reduced as a result of the "pass -by" reduction, only the traffic added to the surrounding streets and intersections. Table 8 reflects the 50% pass -by reduction for the Airport Road/Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict. Page 8 TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. Table 7 Trip Generation — New Trips Tfalinn AmPriran Plaza and Clubhouse District Table 8 Trip Generation — New Trips Road /Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict Total Trips 104 39 143 121 174 295 2,222 Less Bank Pass -by -12 -12 -24 -46 -46 -92 -493 (50% of Bank Trips) New Traffic 92 27 119 75 '128 203 1,729 r. ft l T,;- _ P.-l- Tr fF,1 V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The total trips generated as a result of the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendments indicated within Tables 4 & 5 were then assigned to the surrounding roadway system based on the anticipated routes the drivers will utilize to approach the site. Additionally, these trips were assigned to the site access driveways and the Airport- Pulling Road/Orange Blossom Drive intersection based on the anticipated traffic patterns available as a result of the proposed access configuration. The resultant site traffic assignment and distribution of the Italian American Plaza. and Clubhouse District is indicated in Figure 3. Additionally, Figure 4 reflects the site traffic assignment and distribution of the Airport Road/Orange Blossom Commercial Subdistrict. Page 9 L- AIRPORT ROAD /ORANGE BLOSSOM `' DRIVE COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE ♦ 15 %♦ (0) 0 (18) 16 4.0(0) r 46 (55) I� Nom' 67 tl Q t oc 35 °/c Z_ Er- J J O M N.T.S. O) O 0 (0) ♦8 (10) ti N o `f +, k � 13 (14) (61) 13� ♦20 %♦ (35) 8 0 0 (0) 0 o 0 PROPOSED I INTERCIONNECTION t 1 --o I AIRPORT ROAD/ ORANGE BLOSSOM Q COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT 4 (52) 12 I t M I F(_GKin -4-20%-0- PERCENT DISTRIBUTION r- 000 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC ♦(000) WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC 30% SITE TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT TRANSPORTATION AIRPORT ROAD/ ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT CONSULTANTS, INC. Figure 4 I- .. INTRODUCTION The Longview Center Parcel is located on the east side of the Airport Pulling Road/Orange Blossom Drive intersection in Collier County (see Exhibit 1 Location Map). The site is approximately 15 acres in size with approximately 5 acres on the northeast corner of the intersection and approximately 10 acres on the southeast corner of the intersection. There is an existing single access point onto Orange Blossom Drive from each parcel. Currently, the 5 and 10 -acre parcels are being used as plant nurseries. The current Future Land Use for the site is Orange Blossom Mixed Use Sub District and the site is within the Traffic Congestion Zone. The project will contain two phases. Phase I will include 22,150 square foot of retail shops and 19,000 square foot of office space. Phase I is projected to be complete prior to the 2005 Peak Season. Phase H (the south parcel) will include 50,000 square foot of retail shops, 51,000 square foot office space and 15 multi- family dwelling units. Phase II ,-- is projected to be complete prior to the 2008 Peak Season. The purpose of this study is to provide the technical traffic analysis in support of the Rezone. Both AM and PM Peak Hour Volumes were analyzed. 1:\ Projects \Archive \Docs\Projects1804 \80478 - Putting \Orange BIosscm\Traffic \80478- TIS.d0c z �- shown in Table 1B. See Appendix A for the Internal Capture Summary worksheet, which was used to determine the internal capture rate. Table 1 A 341 246 95 747 329 418 Table IS PROJECT TRIP GENERATION- (PHASE I ONLY) 2005 v PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION WITH ADJUSTMENTS (PHASE I ONLY) 2005 AM PM Peak Enter Land Use ADT Peak Enter Exit Peak Enter Exit Office (LU 710): 19,000 SF 371 50 44 6 28 5 23 Retail (LU 820): 22,150 SF 2,586 65 40 25 232 111 121 Totals 2,957 115 83 31 261 116 144 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION - (PHASE II ONLY) 2008 PM AM Peak Enter PM Multi- Farnify (LU 230): 15 DU 13 Land Use ADT Peak Enter Exit Peak Enter Exit Multi- Family (LU 230): 15 DU 130 11 2 9 13 9 4 Office (LU 710): 51,000 SF 791 109 95 13 76 13 63 Retail (LU 820): 50,000 SF 4,365 106 64 41 397 191 207 Totals 5,286 226 162 64 486 212 274 TOTAL. OF PHASE I & It 8,243 341 246 95 747 329 418 Table IS v PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION WITH ADJUSTMENTS (PHASE I ONLY) 2005 PM Land Use Peak Enter Exit Office (LU 710): 19,000 SF 28 5 23 Mixed Use Internal Capture -4 -2 -2 Retail (LU 820): 22,150 SF 232 111 121 Mixed Use Internal Capture -4 -2 -2 Passby Capture 43% -98 47 -51 Totals 154 65 89 PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION WITH ADJUSTMENTS (PHASE 11 ONLY) 2008 PM Land Use Peak Enter Exit Multi- Farnify (LU 230): 15 DU 13 9 4 Mixed Use Internal Capture -5 -3 -2 Office (LU 710): 51,000 SF 76 13 63 Mixed Use Internal Capture -9 -4 -5 Retail (LU 820): 50,000 SF 397 191 207 Mixed Use Internal Capture -23 -11 -12 Passby Capture 43% -161 -77 -84 Totals 288 117 171 f TOTAL OF PHASE I & Il "3 182 260 l:\ Projects 'Archive\Docs\Projects1B04 180478- Pulling\Orange Blossom�Traffic180478- TIS.doc 4 �- PROJECTED TRAFFIC TRIP GENERATION Site- generated trips were estimated using Institute of Transportation Engineers (1TE) Tri Generation (7 ".' Edition), in accordance with current Collier County policy. The following trip generation formulas were used: Multi - family (LU 230): ADT: Ln (T) = 0.85 Ln (X) + 2.55 AM Peak Hour: Ln (T) = 0.80 Ln (X) + 0.26 PM Peak Hour. Ln (T) = 0.82 Ln (X) + 0.32 Shopping Center (LU 820): ADT: Ln(T) = 0.65 Ln(X) + 5.83 AM Peak Hour. Ln(T) = 0.60 Ln(X) + 2.29 PM Peak Hour: Ln(T) = 0.66 Ln(X) + 3.40 PASS -BY T= Ln (T) = -0.291 Ln (X) + 5.001 General Office Building (LU 710) ADT: Ln (T) = 037 Ln (X) + 3.65 AM Peak Hour. Ln m = 0.80 Ln (X) + 1.55 PM Peak Hour: (T) = I.12 (X) + 78.81 Medical Office (LU 720): ADT: T = 40.89(X) — 214.97 AM Peak Hour: T = 2.48(X) PM Peak Hour. Ln(T) = 0.93 Ln(X) + 1.47 Since the proposed development will have dissimilar land uses, a percentage of the site- generated traffic will be captured by the land uses inside the development and not be introduced to the external roadway network. Internal capture trips were estimated using rate and summary sheets shown in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook An ITE Recommended Practice (see Appendix). In addition, the retail land use will capture pass -by from the adjacent traffic stream on Airport- Pulling Road. The ITE Trip. Generation Handbook An ITE Recommended Practice was used to determine a 43% Pass -By Capture reduction (see Appendix). The increase in through traffic on Airport - Pulling Road using 25% Pass -By reduction is marginal compared to its high Remaining Capacity (1103). A 43% Pass -By Capture reduction was used in the analyses of this report as supported by The ITE Trip Generation Handbook An ITE Reconaimended Practice. Table 1. summarizes the trip generation estimates for this development. Sao Grato SDP TlS 6 Sep 05%80685TA1006A< TABLE 2 Site generated Trip Distribution Traffic Distribution Link From To Residential Commerc. Office Orange Blossom Drive Goodlette -Frank Rd Airport - Pulling Road 15% 10% 10% Orange Blossom Drive Airport - Pulling Road Bridgewater Bay Blvd 10% 20% 20% Orange Blossom Drive Bridgewater Bay Blvd Livingston Rd 10% 20% 20% Airport - Pulling Road Vanderbilt Beach Rd Project Access 40% 40% 50% Airport- Pulling Road Project Access Orange Blossom Drive 60% 60% 50% Airport.-Pulling Road Orange Blossom Drive j &C Blvd 35% 30% 20% Airport-Pulling Road Immokalee Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd 10% 15% 20% Airport- Pulling Road l &C Blvd Naples Blvd 30% 15% 20% Airport- Pulling Road Naples Blvd Pine Ridge Rd 25% 0% 20% Airport- Pulling Road Pine Ridge Rd Golden Gate Pkwy 15% 0% lo% Goodlette -Frank Rd Orange Blossom Drive Pine Ridge Rd 10% 0% 5% Goodlette -Frank Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Orange Blossom Drive 5% 0% 5% Livingston Rd Orange Blossom Drive Pine Ridge Rd 5% 10% 10% Livingston Rd Vanderbilt Beach Rd Orange Blossom Drive 5% 10% 10% Vanderbilt Beach Rd us 41 Airport - Pulling Road 15% 10% 10% Vanderbilt Beach Ad Airport- Pulling Road Logan Boulevard 15% 5% 20% Pine Ridge Road Airport - Pulling Road 1 -75 5% 0% 5% The trip distribution percentages of each land use were applied to the site- generated traffic volumes to deteniiine the site - generated vehicle trip assignment. The proposed commercial retail use is of a "neighborhood" nature rather than "regional' in scope. For this reason, the area of influences will likely be confined to residential developments along Orange Blossom east and west of Airport- Pulling Road. The radius of influence was assumed to be not higher than 1.5 miles from the site. Exhibits 6 and 7 presents the proposed entering and exiting traffic of AM & PM peak Hours respectively. Pass -by deductions are shown in Exhibit 8. Net entering and exiting traffic in the PM. Peak Hours, including Pass -By trips at the Project Access points on Airport Pulling Road are presented in Exhibit 9. These exhibits also include the Vanderbilt Beach Road & Airport- Pulling Road intersection as well as the Aiiport- Pulling Road & Orange Blossom Drive intersection, among other intersections near the project site. The PM Peak Hour traffic. characteri sties were studied because the site- related land use peak hour typically occurs in the PM Peak Hour of the adjacent street traffic. Sao Goto SDP TIS 8 1.\Projects\806=&B5\Trafnc \Update Scp 05\B0685TA1006.doc year 2004; B) the construction of Livingston Road from Radio Road to Immokalee Road as a six -lane arterial and from Immokalee Road into Lee County as a four -lane arterial during year 2003; C) the six -lane expansion of Pine Ridge Road from Airport Pulling Road past I -75 which is currently under construction; and D) the four -lane expansion of Vanderbilt Beach Road from Airport Pulling Road to Logan Boulevard in year 2002. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT The pattern of site traffic distribution is based upon locations of generators and attractors in the area of the project. The traffic distribution for the project was discussed and approved in a methodology meeting with Collier County Transportation Planning and is shown in Table 2. Table 2 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION -PM PEAK HOUR (NEW TRIPS) Land Use Traffic Distribution Orange Blossom east of Project 10% Orange Blossom west of Project 10% Airport north of Orange Blossom 40% Airport south of Orange Blossom 40% 6 l: \Projects\Archive \oocs\ Projects \8 0 418047 8 - Pulling \Orange Blossom \Traffi680478- TIS.doc ANNUAL GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION 2007 ADT "(1lYrs of Growth) Annual Growth Rate (AGR) = 1 Base Year ADT 11446 " (115) AGR (Orange Blossom Dr) = 1 9348 AGR (Orange Blossom Dr) = 4.13% 2002 2007 ANNUAL COUNT BASE YR TRAFFIC YRS OF GROWTH ROADWAY SEGMENT STA # TRAFFIC VOLUME GROWTH RATE Airport Pulling Road N. of Orange Blossom Dr. 599 45664 36027 5 2.00% S. of Orange Blossom Dr 503 44288 39679 5 2.00% J & C Blvd W. of Airport Rd 631 12040 10222 5 2.00% Orange Blossom Dr W. of Airport Rd 647 9348 11446 5 4.13% E. of Airport Rd 647 9348 11446 5 4.13% W. of Livingston Rd 647 9348 11446 5 4.13% Side Street Approaches — -- — — 2.00% All traffic volumes were taken from the 2007 Collier County Average Daily Traffic Report ' to instances where the historical data indicates a reduction in traffic, a minimum annual growth rate of 2.0% was assumed. SAMPLE GROWTH RATE CALCULATION 2007 ADT "(1lYrs of Growth) Annual Growth Rate (AGR) = 1 Base Year ADT 11446 " (115) AGR (Orange Blossom Dr) = 1 9348 AGR (Orange Blossom Dr) = 4.13% 1 p e I i .Li1 ! FUTURE ENTRANCE TO SAO GRATO I '+ : e5 AA y A erg llIi� ;'.e ,:e1%Iljllyan ! n(� ;'•A' A p ' • PD[alru, RBUrr.1 __..____ 1 'IAA II 1 lie' Al, dd r!i n'Ii j :dlGl A 4 I lk p C, is h; II I' •� l 1• A +1 f M I A j� y'. A IIi SEE MARGIN y.l I MI FM .:(239)2M.2000 Ali FbIWd COMAOI» PI A,d/ ,lalbnNxlM S I A7�jieUN 0 SEE yT,I{, 2006.OI9 I a i M ORANGE OLOSSOM7DR1W—,— I -- I I , i 1 BUCKLEY MIXED USE PALD. ( SAO GRATO ) AL R COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE (EASTBOUND IMPROVEMENTS) I I ADDITIONAL LEFT TURN LANE ADDED 1 LacKwooD I I TRUST PROPERTY 1 ORANGE BLOSSOM / AIRPORT CROSSROADS SUBDISTRICT MESS tD ( ITALIAN AMERICAN CLUB and the ;V AOPENT, t CORRADI AIRPORT Inc. PROPERTY, TOTAL 10.0 Ac. ) S 1 I � ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE & AIRPORT-FULLING ROAD e li I l l n•.� in IIi l j ie�1 e I l ei I p () 1 1 ) AI I A 1 1 I � `I A•I r I I • I• '� I ,_MAY W 1 III HOLE MONT" DarEDe�WAeuew+FraD PROPOSED POCKET U —TURN ST. KATHERRVL•S GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH AIRPORT — PULLING ROAD (SOUTHBOVND IMPROVEMENTS) • POCKET U —TURN ADDED PRIOR TO INTERSECTION • EXISTING LEFT TURN LANE EXTENDED PROPOSED EXTENSION OF EXISTING LEFT TURN LANE o w loo leo PTiPIt M rIIT -� LEGEND -�- _ -� -- = D.- EXISTRIG ASPNALT PAVpACNi DENOTES PROPOSED NEW WAN LANE MPNOV[MENTS DOOM E.nNO PAVEMENT MMWNG DENOTES PROPOSED PAVEMENT YARNING LONGVIEW CENTER P.LLD. i LCS WESTMPISTER IP.U.D. ��1j I YII el� ie!j ,:e1%Iljllyan II n(� ;'•A' Ae ui' 'IaP(D M WDC ^At^ [wl. ' • PD[alru, RBUrr.1 __..____ 1 'IAA II A IAA¢ IRiI f;o�,I''Aeg' n'Ii j :dlGl i l be p{ I I lk 1 ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE (WESTBOUND IMPROVEMENTS) C, ADDITIONAL LEFT TURN LANE ADDED e li I l l n•.� in IIi l j ie�1 e I l ei I p () 1 1 ) AI I A 1 1 I � `I A•I r I I • I• '� I ,_MAY W 1 III HOLE MONT" DarEDe�WAeuew+FraD PROPOSED POCKET U —TURN ST. KATHERRVL•S GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH AIRPORT — PULLING ROAD (SOUTHBOVND IMPROVEMENTS) • POCKET U —TURN ADDED PRIOR TO INTERSECTION • EXISTING LEFT TURN LANE EXTENDED PROPOSED EXTENSION OF EXISTING LEFT TURN LANE o w loo leo PTiPIt M rIIT -� LEGEND -�- _ -� -- = D.- EXISTRIG ASPNALT PAVpACNi DENOTES PROPOSED NEW WAN LANE MPNOV[MENTS DOOM E.nNO PAVEMENT MMWNG DENOTES PROPOSED PAVEMENT YARNING LONGVIEW CENTER P.LLD. i LCS WESTMPISTER IP.U.D. ��1j I YII el� ie!j ,:e1%Iljllyan II IIAp,�Att ;'•A' Ae ui' 'IaP(D M WDC ^At^ [wl. ' • PD[alru, RBUrr.1 __..____ 1 'IAA II A IAA¢ IRiI f;o�,I''Aeg' n'Ii j :dlGl i l be p{ I I lk 1 ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE (WESTBOUND IMPROVEMENTS) ADDITIONAL LEFT TURN LANE ADDED W L1 j e li I l l n•.� in IIi l j ie�1 e I l ei I p () 1 1 ) AI I A 1 1 I � `I A•I r I I • I• '� I ,_MAY W 1 III HOLE MONT" DarEDe�WAeuew+FraD PROPOSED POCKET U —TURN ST. KATHERRVL•S GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH AIRPORT — PULLING ROAD (SOUTHBOVND IMPROVEMENTS) • POCKET U —TURN ADDED PRIOR TO INTERSECTION • EXISTING LEFT TURN LANE EXTENDED PROPOSED EXTENSION OF EXISTING LEFT TURN LANE o w loo leo PTiPIt M rIIT -� LEGEND -�- _ -� -- = D.- EXISTRIG ASPNALT PAVpACNi DENOTES PROPOSED NEW WAN LANE MPNOV[MENTS DOOM E.nNO PAVEMENT MMWNG DENOTES PROPOSED PAVEMENT YARNING LONGVIEW CENTER P.LLD. i LCS WESTMPISTER IP.U.D. ' ' gnu »wt pwA. I ' I r: --------- — _`__—_ -- `---1--`- ------ WDC ^At^ [wl. ' • PD[alru, RBUrr.1 __..____ 1 I 1 � I • gIM»AQ [SME I I �NVP. CRNAT. FSMf. LONE OAK P.LLD. I LONGVIEW CENTER P.U.D. 1 I I I 1 ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE (WESTBOUND IMPROVEMENTS) ADDITIONAL LEFT TURN LANE ADDED W [naNaR. I. All cAU. •A. Ncwx B60 Enron rosy NepMR, FI. ]5110 EXHIBIT rA' '°'m'O°'' SEE MARGIN 4583 -1 FM .:(239)2M.2000 PROPOSED INTERSECTION FbIWd COMAOI» PI A,d/ ,lalbnNxlM IMPROVEMENTS 2006.OI9 I a i AIRPORT PULLING ROAD AND O - BLOSJOM DRIVE INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS - PREL .GARY iPINION OF COST AIRPORT PULLING ROAD /ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE INTERSECTION U TURN - SOUTHBOU DIRECTION OF TRAVEL UNIT EASTBOUNI NESTBC I NC30UTHBOUNC ND i TOTAL QTY UNIT COST TOTAL COST ITALIAN AMERICAN CLUB SF 2,550 2550.001 Ila $20.00 $51,000.00 ;SUBTOTAL: $51,000.00 MOBILIZATION LS $50,000.00 $50,000.00 LS.. 000.00 ; $40,000;00 MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC - - -- - U STAKED SILT FENCE (TYPE Ilq I LF 652 845 0 0 - - 1497.00 $3,742.50 CLEARING AND GRUBBING AC 0.15 I 0.33 0.23 1 0.07 - _ -0.78- T $4,000.00 I $3,120.00 REMOVAL OF EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKS _ SY 422 - _ 542 _ I =- 984.00 S1S.00LL $14,460.00 REMOVEEXISTINGASPHALTPAVEMENT - SY - 135 1,11 :- _ __ i 1254.00 _ $3.00 $3,762,00 REMOVE (DITCH BOTTOM INLETS) - EA 1 -_ _ _- 1.00 + __ _.... 2.00 $1 - -- -__. 53 000 OOn . $6,000.00 REMOVE INLET, - EXCAVATION REGULAR _ CY 370 635 375 - 125 1405.00 $10.00_ -- $14,050.00 REMOVE RCP (24 ") LF 400 _. 400.00 _ _ -- $355.00 ' . ._ .. _ .._ '--- $14,000.00 •_..- -.. REMOVE 1.4.'X 23 E RCP ' LF 15 15.00 $30.00 - $450.00 REMOVE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (TYPE F) I LF t 523 897 180 628 2227.99 - $5.00 , $11,139.95 REMOVAL OF 4' WIDE MEDIAN SEPARATOR - LF _- 397 - _ -- - 397_00 _ _ $10.00 REMOVERIPRAP -- .._._._._....... _... _. ._ -.. CY _.. 4.._.._.t. -- - - -- -- - �.0 4.00 ... - -- - $12_00 �- - $48.00 -_.._ - --.._.. MILLING EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT (1 "AVERAGE DEPTH) SY - 1,381 _- - 1391.0 -- $11.00 ; _ $15,301.00 STABILIZATION TYPE B(UBGRADE) _- SY. _ 763 - . 1,41 -+ 147 - 714 - 3041:00 - $4.25 $12,921.25. --' _ ... 10" LIMEROCK BASE .., • , _• _ +.. SY 763 . - -_ - -, 1,417 147 714 a 3041.00 _ -. $17.00 $51,697.00 ASPHALT IC CONCRETE, TYPE S_I(3 ") SY 763 _ 1;41 - 147 714 - 3041.00 - $19.00- $57,779.00 -- - ASPHALTIC CONCRETE, TYPE 111 1 ") 5- - SY _ 783 1,41 147 ..714 3040.74 - $8.00 $18,244.43 OVERLAY OF EXISTING ASPHALTIC PAVEMENT (4" AVG. DEPTH) _ SY 1,03 1037.00 - - $25.00 $25,925.00 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (4" THICK) - - -- - I SY - 423 545 T _ 988_00 - $2b.00 T $24,200.00 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER (TYPE F) -_ LF 685 1,18 178 432 2479.00 $15.0 $37,185.00 4'WIDEMEDIANSEPARATOR ._.,•,._• .•__._ '--- - --... .. -- I 1 LF_.- •_._. -.- -• -., _____427 _ _ - . . r .__. 34 . -_ 461.00 $35.00 - 16,135,0_0 T WIDE MEDIAN SEPARATOR LF - 95 _ _ -- , -_• 95.00 , , - -_. - -„ $61.25 -. „ , _ ._. ' $5,818.75. _ . - INSTALL TYPE P -5 INLET EA - 2 i 3.00 $5:000,00 $15,000_00 RCP (18 ^) -PIPE STORM SEWER CULVERT LF 18 99 117.00 ._ _,_•__ $50,001 $5,850.00 R 4 RGP (24 ") - PIPE STORM SEWER CULVERT - - - LF . - - -• 400 -. .__ .400.00 - - $05.00 -. $261000.00 ERCPQj "•x23 ") - _._ • -- -- '- -- _- -.. 15 _. -.- _ ._ 15.00 -- - $55.00 $825.00 MITERED END SECTION (16-RCP.) -• - -- -. - _.. -_.. - -1 . EA _.. _ -._ 3 -- -_ -. 300 4 . -.. _ 00.00 $1.0$2.50 .00 $3,000 _ _ -- -• SODDING (BAHIA) _. SY 420 - - 1428.00 $3,570.00 INSTALL ALUMINUM HANDRAIL LF 440 I - - - 440.00 - $120.00 i - $52,800.00 HAY OR STRAW BALE (18 "xtB "x36 ") -- - - _ _. EA . _ --- _ -. -- - ( - -__ 2:00 _ $10.00 . - _ $10.00 RIPRAP (RUBBLE)., _ SY 400 _... - •. j _- -. 400.00 - $75.00 _ $30,000.00 ' - (SUBTOTAL: $568,516.88 C: \Documents and Setting sVrlp\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files \OLK7C \060909 Traffic Analysis for Airport Pulling - Orange Blossom Is AIRPORT PULLING ROAD AND OR - BLOSSOM DRIVE INTERSECTION t TRAFFIC ANALYSIS - PR ,GARY OPINION OF COST AIRPORT PULLING ROAD /ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE INTERSECTION DIRECTION OF TRAVEL RELOCATE METAL. LIGHT POLES WIRING ALLOWANCE _ U TURN - SOUTHBOU UNIT = ASTBOUN[NESTBOUNL30UTHBOUNE ND TOTAL QTY UNIT COST TOTAL -- � 2.0.00,00. . l ._ ' -- -- EA - - -- LS ' ; 750.00 �_ $750.00 _.. -- i _._.- ......... SUBTOTAL: 52,750._ .... —_.. -. _ ._. •- - -- -.. . —. .. __.. ..._- . ... _. ..._ Total: 5951,064.98 —.. _.. . PLUS 15% CONTINGENCIES; _ - -._ -- $142,659, _ 'SUBTOTAL: 51,097,72412 � r _ $164,0 , :PLUS DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATIONfINSPECTION: ..._ - . ..- - -- - -RAND TOTAL! $1,257,763.43 C• ents and Settings1r1p1Local SellingslTemporary Internet FileslOLK7C10B0909 Traffic Analysis for Airport Puil ^ nge Blossom.xls TRIP GENERATION EQUATIONS AIRPORT ROAD/ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS ITE TRIP GENERATION REPORT, 7th EDITION Land Use Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Residential Condo/Townhouse (LUC 230) Ln (T) = 0.80 Ln (X) + 0.26 Ln (T) = 0.82 Ln (X) + 0.32 17% in 83% out 33% in 67% out T = Trips, X = dwelling units CCRC T= 0.18 (X) T = 0.18 (X) + 39:13 (LUC 255) 64% in 34% out 48% in 52% out T = Trips, X = dwelling units ORES Co per C;014-pity Growth Management Division Planning & Regulation GMP Application CPSS - 2011 -01 Corradi Airport GMPA Re: Analysis of Growth at Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Pulling Road To whom it may concern, Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the available traffic data in the vicinity of this petition, and has determined that the adjacent roadway network will have sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5 year planning period. Concurrency values were analyzed consistently with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. An estimated [positive] growth rate of 1.5% annually was assumed in background traffic volumes in order to analyze the projected 2016 scenario in terms of intersection approach traffic volumes. Please see Exhibit A, attached. As a result of this analysis, Staff recommends that this amendment can be deemed cons ent �l-ofdw- with Ei the need for additional mitigation. Orange Blossom Drive Impacts: Staff analyzed the Orange Blossom Drive concurrency links that are impacted by this project. A nominal growth rate of 1.5% was applied to Link 142, Orange Blossom Drive from Goodlette Road to Airport Road; and link 143 from Airport Road to Livingston. These segments of Orange Blossom Drive currently have a remaining capacity of 275 trips, and 345 trips (respectively); and are both currently operating at LOS "C" as reflected by the adopted 2011 AUIR. Staff has determined that this segment will continue to operate at LOS "C" during the five year planning period. Airport Road Impacts: Staff analyzed the Airport Road concurrency links that are impacted by this project. A nominal growth rate of 1.5% was applied to Link 2.1 from Vanderbilt Beach Road to Orange Blossom Drive; and link 2.2 from Orange Blossom Drive to Pine Ridge. These segments of Airport Road currently have a remaining capacity of 1,879 trips, and 1,880 trips (respectively); and are both currently operating at LOS "C" as reflected by the adopted 2011 AUIR. Staff has determined that these segments will continue to operate at LOS "C" during the five year planning period. 71 hank you, John M. Podczerwinsky Development Review Project Manager, Transportation Planning Section Growth Management Division Land Development Services Department Gnw,7i t.7-:r Dex = P:.—^,1g & Reg at z 28;._ No -. F+ sesr= Dave - Na;,�es Fiwkl a 34 !D4 •239- 252-24CO • wnw• u_k egav net Airport Road tw Vanderhrit Beach Road to Orange Btostw Dr Airport Road tram, OraV 81mom Dr. to Pkae Ridge Rd. Orange Bbissom irw Goodetfe -Frank Rd to ,Airport- Pulbhg Rd. Orange Bbssom tram Airpat -Puftg Rd: to Livingston Rid. Exhibit Service 2011 Adapted Volume Total Remaining LOS (Capacfty) Volume Capacity Std VISkd 2011 V13td 2016 Ratio LOS 2016 Ratio LOS E 3970 2091 1879 E 0.53 C 2111 0.53 C E 3970 2090 1880 E 0.53 C 2230 0.56 C D 850 575 275 D 0.68 C 619 0.73 C D 920 575 345 D 0TH C 619 0.67 C �o ler County Growth Management Division Planning & Regulation December R5, 2011 Ren Mora Naples It, I n encan Club Foundation, Inc. 7035 Airpo oad North Naples, F 34109 Subject: �equest to Complete a Letter of No Objection — Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment CPSS - 2011 -1, for the Orange Blossom /Airport Crossroads Commercial Mr. Morani Please be advised that Michael Corradi has filed an application with the County to amend the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to remove certain intersection improvers Rt requirements from the provisions of the Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Goef ' : Corradi is the ro owner of the land making up the southern portion of the are comprising this Subdistrict, while the Italian American Club Foundation owns a northern portion. : e removal of the referenced requirements affects the entire Subdistrict acreage. The specific a ndments to the Subdistrict provisions are identified in the attached exhibit. As part o ner of Subdistrict acreage, it is not necessary to become a co-applicant in the present request.. kn alternative arrangement does not necessitate your active participation in the current amendme t process. Please re iew this request and indicate your consent to these amendments by means of signing the Letter of I Oo Objection" and return same to me at your earliest convenience. Should vp6j have any questions, contact me at 239.252.2944. Thank you in advance to your prompt attentiomt this matter. LSTSned1 . Corby Sd midt, AICP Pdncipaf! tanner Compret nsive Planning Section Land De` 'lopment Services GAMES Pn SwA=ce CompmhensWCOMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments12011 Small Scale AmendmentaQrange Blossom Crossroads - Corradi Requ PSS- 2011 -1 Request for Letter of No Objec#on = Growth Mang mt Division - Planning & Regulation • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104.239- 252 -2400 • www.cofiergov.net Corby Sc Principal Compret Land De' 2800 No Naples, I Subject: idt, AICP nner ;ive Planning Section pment Services iorseshoe Drive 34104 of No Objection — Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment - 2011 -1, for the Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Mr. Schm ,. , On behalf ,f the Naples Italian American Club Foundation, I have reviewed your request fora Letter of No Obje Wonff for the removal of certain intersection improvement requirements from the provisions pertaining o the above mentioned Subdistrict. 4-- 4ae -.r mArmmn4 of theca nrnvicinns_ Should yo Sincerely, By: is Print Nme Date: have any questions, contact me at 239.594.8480. t 4001 DRAFT Exhibit A D Ve. FT C. Urban C*jnmerclal District CPSS- 2011 -1 Future Land Use Element [Page 62] This Subd consists of two parcels comprising approximately 10 acres and is located on the southwest comer of intersection of Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road. This Subdistrict allows for existing institutional 'ses, such as the Italian American Club clubhouse or another social or fraternal organization, future institutional uses for a school, and limited commercial, professional and general offices, and similar uses to serve the n arby community, along with senior housing in the form of an assisted living fadity, continuing care retirement nter, or other similar housing for the elderly. Developme intensity for this Subdistrict shall be limited to a maximum of 74,000 square feet of gross leasable area for ncial institutions, schools, professional, medical and general offices, adult and child day care, personal ar 0 business services, and a maximum of 20,000 square feet for the clubhouse facility, all of which uses are all ' wed by right or by conditional use in the C-1 Zoning District, as identified in the Collier County Land Developme it Code, Ordinance No. 04 -41, as amended. Uses will be further evaluated at the time of rezoning of each pa i to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties. Any senior housing facility is not subject to this square Ifootage [imitation but must meet all other provisions in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance o. 0441, in effect as of the effective date of this amendment. The development of this Subdistrict shall be g.. 0 med by the following criteria: a. R es are encouraged to be in the tone of a manna unit Uevelopment ana musE omram d , o on nlopment standards to ensure that all uses will be compatible with neighboring residential and ins tional uses. G. b. F Arcel 1 This a roxirnateiy 5-acre parcel is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Orange Blossom Drive: hd Airport Road. This parcel is limited to a maximum of 34,000 square feet of gross leasable area for financi i institutions, schools, professional, medical and general offices, and personal and business se rvi , in addition to a maximum of 20,000 square feet for the clubhouse facility. Marcel 1 is governed by the ad itional, following requirements: i.. I Jedestrian interconnection to access Parcel 2 and property immediately to the west must be pursued by the property owner, and incorporated into the overall site design. ii., Vshicular interconnection with Parcel 2 is required, particularly to provide southbound traffic direct Tess onto Airport Road. Vehicular use areas, buildings and structures, landscape buffering and open s ``ce, and other uses shall be designed in such a manner that does not impede or interfere with access to I Or from the adjacent parcel to -the South. Words underlined are added; words stmGk Raul} are deleted. !i ii iii. : The existing easternmost vehicular access drive onto Orange Blossom Drive shall be removed or anently dosed -off by the property owner prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for any fu er development or redevelopment of the site. iv veiopment within Parcel 1 shall have common site, signage and building architectural elements, inci tiing on -site signs directing motorists toward southbound egress through Parcel 2 onto Airport d: c. Parcel 2 This ap ximately 5-acre parcel is located on the west side of Airport Road, approximately 330 feet south Of the i ersection of Airport Road and Orange Blossom Drive. This parcel is limited to a maximum of 40,000 uare feet of gross leasable area for financial institutions, professional, medical and generall offices, adult a child day care, personal and business services, and an assisted living faciTrty, continuing. care rned by the additions[, following reti itt center, or other similar housing for the elderly. Parcel 2 is gove 1. P strian interconnection to access Parcel 1 and properties immediately to the south and to the west mu be pursued by the property owner, and incorporated into the overall site design. ii. ehicular interconnection with Parcel 1 is required, particularly to provide eastbound traffic direct 4 eg onto Orange Blossom Drive. Vehicular use areas, buildings and structures, landscape buffering an i open space, an o er uses s a esrg �n s�fr a rrranrrerttrai doeampede °r r "terfenr wi access to or from the adjacent parcel to the north. M. evelopment within Parcel 2 shall have common site, signage and building architectural elements, inc I;ding on -site signs directing motorists toward northbound egress through Parcel 1 onto Orange B orn Drive. —2— i Words underlined are added; words stw"Fough are deleted. AGENDA ITEM 8F & 9A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN OWN I asi I not ■re awe — ._.tae - n� -T- sae I as4 T _ r.. �........ NITYRN LA ■o 099 MAP ®.....�.....�.. o u .if a.. O i A~�� IN ■i ■r rrraarea, -..r.. a a I aa1 1 134 E 1 2011 EAR -Based Amendments Collier County Planning Commission March 01, 2012 [continued from 1/26/2012/2/16/2012] County Clerks Office 4th Floor Administration Building (F) Attn: Patricia Morgan AGENDA ITEM 8 -F This item has been delivered separately from Comprehensive Planning A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Based Amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89 -05, as amended, specifically amending the Capital Improvement Element, Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element, Potable Water Sub - Element, Drainage Sub - Element, Solid Waste Sub - Element, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element, Recreation & Open Space Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, Economic Element, and Public Schools Facilities Element, and furthermore recommending Transmittal of these amendments to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] EAR -BASEL �MPA EXHIBIT "A" COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA COMPARISON MAP Legend OLD (EXISTING) CHHA NEW CHHA ON FLUM TRAFFIC CONGESTION AREA (TO BE DELETED) 0 NEW CHHA 04 cn Z U) I- U) 1 � o � TqM /qM/ TRH F co N d , w C i S 0 1 2 4 6 ' Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH Y, AICP TECHNOLOGY & GIS SUPPORT FILE; G:IGIS \DATAREOUEST \CHHA.MXD February 2012 -5- er C___ty cn r; 846 �. LU \ • a, .. 0 GOLDEN GOLDEN ► ��: INTERSTATE Jff, if ^� 10 "Ilk lidw i� 1 � o � TqM /qM/ TRH F co N d , w C i S 0 1 2 4 6 ' Miles GIS MAPPING: BETH Y, AICP TECHNOLOGY & GIS SUPPORT FILE; G:IGIS \DATAREOUEST \CHHA.MXD February 2012 -5- er C___ty cn r; 846 DATE: FEBRUARY 21, 2012 TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: CORBY SCHMIDT, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION, LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION SUBJECT: REVIEW OF PROPOSED COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENTS BASED ON THE 2011 EVALUATION & APPRAISAL REPORT, SPECIFICALLY, AMENDMENTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT; TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT; SANITARY SEWER SUB - ELEMENT, POTABLE WATER SUB - ELEMENT, DRAINAGE SUB - ELEMENT, SOLID WASTE SUB - ELEMENT, AND NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB - ELEMENT OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES ELEMENT; HOUSING ELEMENT; RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT; CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT; INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT; FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT; GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN; ECONOMIC ELEMENT; AND, PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT; AND FURTHERMORE RECOMMENDING TRANSMITTAL OF THESE AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. [TRANSMITTAL HEARING CONTINUED FROMJANUAR Y 2 6, 2012 & FEBRUARY 16, 2012] On January 26 and February 16, 2012 the Planning Commission reviewed amendments proposed to the Collier County Growth Management Plan based on the 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR). During the January 26 hearing, certain planning issues surfaced bringing individual polices and/or objectives suggested for modification into question. The Commission directed staff to address those issues further, prior to the Transmittal recommendation on EAR -based GMP amendments appearing on the CCPC Consent Agenda of March 1. As directed, those issues were contained in the document entitled EAR -based GMP Amendments continued to the February 16, 2012 CCPC Hearing. The CCPC acknowledged those issues were properly addressed on that date. This acknowledgement together with the previously - provided Summary of Changes to EAR -based GMP Amendments and the GMP Elements and Sub - Elements provide the basis for a recommendation to Transmit, with two exceptions. A final set of policies contained in the Housing Element and the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) are being presented to the CCPC at the Transmittal hearing continued to March 1. The outstanding Housing Element and CCME objectives and policies intended for substantive review have been shaded in gray and are followed by bracketed text indicating [outstanding substantive issues remain]. -1- REVIEW MEMO FOR TRANSMITTAL HEARING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26, 2012 EST FEBRUARY 16, 2012 Housing Element OBJECTIVE l: [Revised text, page 3] The .,,•., be Provide new affordable •T�- ee housing units shall inefease by at least fifteen pefeepA of the units appfeved to be buift in the Geunty per- year, but not less than 1,000 units pef ye ^ °a evef a five • ° ^a in order an ef€eft to ^ ^tee meeti*g the current and future housing needs of legal residents with very-low, low and moderate incomes, including households with special needs such as rural and farmworker housing in mfal C^"' °r r- eui t� By January 2014, establish a method of Indexing the demand for very -low, low and moderate housing. per_ .. By January 2014, establish a method of Indexing the availability and costs of very -low, low and moderate housing. By January 2014, develop methods to predict future shortages. based on the Indexes established in Policies 1.1 and 1.2 above. By January 2015, establish necessary strategies, methods and tools to support this Objective. On an annual basis, beginning in June 2014, provide a report to the Board of County Commissioners on the status of affordable housing within the County. OBJECTIVE 2: [Revised text, page 3] age ies shall assist Collie Increase the number of affordable �•�^ -wee housing units., by the methods contained within Objective 1 and subsequent Policies , t less than 1,000 units p aver-aged eve- ^ five . ° o for very-low, low and moderate income residents. with the assistance of for - profit and not - for - profit providers of affordable housing within the of Collie County and its municipalities. OBJECTIVE 8: [Revised text, page 10] Collier- County shall ^^»*roue to Uutilize SHIP, r''-'B State and Federal rg ants or other funding sources and, in collaboration with Feder-a!, State an non- profit housing agencies, will seek to provide a minimum of 50 rehabilitated or new residential units per year for very low, low and moderate income residents of the immekalee Urban Area, Rufal Fringe Mixed Use Distfiet, and within the v,,..,,i Lands Stewardship Are Families benefiting from such housing will include, but are not be limited to, farmworkers and other populations with special housing needs.) [These changes are in response to the CCPC's directive to remove the requirement to provide a specific number of new affordable units annually.] -2- REVIEW MEMO FOR TRANSMITTAL HEARING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26, 2012 & FEBRUARY 16, 2012 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Policy 6.1.1: [Revised text, page 18] For the County's Urban Designated Area, Estates Designated Area, Conservation Designated Area, and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District, Rural - Industrial District and Rural - Settlement Area District as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria, unless the development occurs within the Area of Critical State Concern (ACSC) where the ACSC standards referenced in the Future Land Use Element shall apply. Notwithstanding the ACSC requirements, this policy shall apply to all non - agricultural development except for single - family dwelling units situated on individual parcels that are not located within a watershed management conservation area identified in a Watershed Management Plan developed pursuant to policies supporting Objective 2.1 of this Element. For properties not previously within the Coastal High Hazard Area but now within the Coastal High Hazard Area due to adoption of a revised Coastal High Hazard Area boundary in 2012— the native vegetation preservation and retention standards of the Non - Coastal High Hazard Area shall continue to apply. (Reference the Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map in the Future Land Use Element. [This policy change correlates to the new Coastal High Hazard Area boundary on the Future Land Use Map and Map Series.] Poky 10.1.-5--. [Deleted text, page 44] Mar-inas and all other water dependent and waer- related uses shall eenk�fm to all applieable uses that propose to des4ey wetlands shall pr-ovide for gener-al publie use, -3- REVIEW MEMO FOR TRANSMITTAL HEARING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26, 2012 & FEBRUARY 16, 2012 Coastal High Hazard Area Non - Coastal High Hazard Area Less than 2.5 acres 10% Less than 5 acres. 10% Residential and Mixed Use Equal to or greater Equal to or greater than 5 acres Development than 2.5 acres 25% and less than 20 acres. 15% Equal to or greater than 20 ac. 25% Golf Course 35% 35% Commercial and Industrial Less than 5 acres. 10% Less than 5 acres. 10% Development Equal to or greater Equal to or than 5 acres. 15% greater than 5 acres. 15% Industrial Development (Rural- 50 %, not to exceed 25% of 50 %, not to exceed 25% of the Industrial District only) the project site. project site. [This policy change correlates to the new Coastal High Hazard Area boundary on the Future Land Use Map and Map Series.] Poky 10.1.-5--. [Deleted text, page 44] Mar-inas and all other water dependent and waer- related uses shall eenk�fm to all applieable uses that propose to des4ey wetlands shall pr-ovide for gener-al publie use, -3- REVIEW MEMO FOR TRANSMITTAL HEARING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26, 2012 & FEBRUARY 16, 2012 PoKey 10.1.-&- [Deleted text, page 44] All new mai-7inas, water- dependent and water- related tises that propose to destfey viable, natufally funetiening mafine wetlands shall be required to per-fefm a fiseal analysis in efder- to demenstrate the [Staff recommends the removal of these Policies from the GIP, as impacts to marine wetlands are already regulated by the State and Federal agencies. These Policies have also been difficult for staff to administer as there are no criteria in which to implement. The following is justification for this recommendation (prepared by Stephen Lenberger).] State Permitting Program: Environmental permitting for impacts to wetlands is regulated by the State of Florida through the State Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) program. Permitting is also regulated at the Federal level by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ALOE). Projects permitted under the ERP program are required to demonstrate that they are not contrary to the public interest or, in the case of Outstanding Florida Waters (OFW) that they are clearly in the public interest. Where a project is unable to otherwise meet these criteria, the applicant is required to mitigate adverse effects that may be caused by the regulated activity. The criteria for public interest are identified in 373.414 Florida Statutes and in the Basis of Review for the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). These criteria are as follows. "(a) In determining whether an activity, which is in, on, or over surface waters or wetlands, as delineated in s. 373.421 (1), and is regulated under this part, is not contrary to the public interest or is clearly in the public interest, the governing board or the department shall consider and balance the following criteria: 1. Whether the activity will adversely affect the public health, safety, or welfare or the property of others; 2. Whether the activity will adversely affect the conservation of fish and wildlife, including endangered or threatened species, or their habitats; 3. Whether the activity will adversely affect navigation or the flow of water or cause harmful erosion or shoaling; 4. Whether the activity will adversely affect the fishing or recreational values or marine productivity in the vicinity of the activity; 5. Whether the activity will be of a temporary or permanent nature; 6. Whether the activity will adversely affect or will enhance significant historical and archaeological resources under the provisions of s. 267.061; and 7. The current condition and relative value of functions being performed by areas affected by the proposed activity. (b) If the applicant is unable to otherwise meet the criteria set forth in this subsection, the governing board or the department, in deciding to grant or deny a permit, shall consider measures proposed by or acceptable to the applicant to mitigate adverse effects that may be caused by the regulated activity. Such measures may include, but are not limited to, onsite mitigation, offsite mitigation, offsite regional mitigation, and the purchase of mitigation credits from mitigation banks permitted under s. 373.4136. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to choose the form of mitigation. The mitigation must offset the adverse effects caused by the regulated activity." (373.414 Florida Statutes)" Where mitigation is accepted, financial assurances are required by the State in the amount of 110% of the cost of implementing the mitigation plan. The following was taken from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Monitoring and Report Guidelines. "Financial Assurances — Pursuant to Section 4.3.3.2 (p) of the Basis of Review for mitigation plans with projected implementation costs in excess of $25,000, the permittee shall submit a financial assurance mechanism in the amount of 110% of the itemized cost of implementing the mitigation plan. Acceptable financial assurance mechanisms include approved Letters of Credit (Form No .1106), Performance Bonds (Form No. 1105), Trust Fund Agreements, cash deposits or cash equivalent in an escrow account and several other mechanism outlined in Section 4.3.7.6 of the Basis of Review, Pages 39 -40. Partial Releases of the financial assurance mechanisms may be requested as the mitigation program progresses toward completion. The District can authorize the return and release of portions of these funds provided that the project is in compliance." Aside from permitting for impacts to wetlands, applicants are also required to obtain State -owned submerged land leases for use of State -owned submerged lands. As an incentive for public use of water front, State -owned submerged land lease fees provide incentives for commercial marinas which have a percentage of boat slips available to the general public on a first -come, first - served basis. First come, first served is defined in Chapter 18 -21 Florida Administrative Code any "water dependent facility operated on the sovereign lands of the state the services of which are open to the general public with no qualifying requirements such as club membership, stock ownership, or equity interest, with no longer than one -year rental terms, and with no automatic renewal rights or conditions. This is intended to cover services offered to various types, classes or -4- REVIEW MEMO FOR TRANSMITTAL HEARING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26, 2012 & FEBRUARY 16, 2012 groups of public users and such services need not be comprehensive. The service offered may be a specialty service such as boat repair, seafood purchasing, marine slip rentals or shipping terminals as long as all services offered are open to the general types, classes, or groups of public users with no qualifying requirements such as club membership or stock ownership or equity interest." Incentives for marinas which are open to the public are included below and were taken from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) website for State -owned submerged land leases. "Commercial marinas require authorization which may include approval by the Board of Trustees at a regularly scheduled Cabinet meeting, depending on the size of the lease area. These types of facilities can be private or public with the public facilities being eligible for a 30 percent discount on the lease fees if they have at least 90 percent of the slips available to the general public. In addition, marinas that receive the Clean Marina designation from DEP can earn another 10 percent discount. These discounts encourage and reward marinas that provide public access to the waters of the state. The standard lease term is five years but is increased to ten years for marinas that are at least 90 percent open to the public. Extended term leases of up to 25 years may be obtained if certain rule conditions are met and an additional fee is paid for the extended term. All leases require a nonrefundable processing fee and a lease may be modified and/or assigned to another party if the lessee is complying with statutes and rules and has no outstanding lease fees." Difficulties in administering the Policies (prepared by Stephen Lenberger): Currently, staff is unable to administer the Policies as there are no criteria in which to implement. Specifically, there is no definition on what is meant by "destruction" of marine wetlands or for other provisions of the Policies, such as providing for "general public use ". Permitting through the State and Federal agencies require impacts to marine wetlands (mangroves, seagrass beds, hard bottom benthic environments, etc.) to be minimized, and where impacts occur, to be mitigated. Since these wetlands are mitigated through the State permitting program to insure no net loss of wetland function, they have not been looked upon by the County as being "destroyed ". Hydrologic and other functions of these marine wetlands still remain, not to mention the benefits provided by facilities for enjoyment and appreciation of these resources. Certainly the resource has not been destroyed. There is also concern regarding the provision requiring for general public use of private facilities, particularly as they apply to the water - dependent and water - related uses identified in CCME Policy 10.1.1. The definition of "marina" in the Land Development Code is also broad and applies to a variety of boat facilities, including multi - family dock facilities. Also, to what degree is meant by providing for general public use (public use of a percentage of wetslips or dry storage, use of fueling facilities, boardwalks, rest rooms, parking areas, etc.)? The requirement for a fiscal analysis to demonstrate public benefit and financial feasibility of a proposed development is also a problem. How would a fiscal analysis be performed to demonstrate public benefit? Public benefit of private facilities could simply be by decreasing demand on public facilities. A fiscal analysis for financial feasibility could be demonstrated, at least for project construction. But this would still be subject to economic conditions. How would financial feasibility be demonstrated beyond construction? Staff will discuss these modifications fully on March 1. Direction will be sought on these specific policies — along with a final recommendation relating to EAR -based amendments in their entirety — as well as approval of the Consent Agenda relating to the EAR -based amendments. All modifications approved to date are reflected in the Element and Sub - Element documents prepared for both March 1 consideration and Consent Agenda action, as provided in these Transmittal Hearing booklets. If you have any questions or comments regarding these EAR -based GMP amendments prior to the meeting on March 1, please feel free to contact Corby Schmidt at 252.2944. G: \CDES Planning Services \Comprehensive\2011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTS \CCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendments \CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda Materials \01 March 12 EAR CONSENT AGENDA memo to CCPC_1.docx -5- REVIEW MEMO FOR TRANSMITTAL HEARING CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 26, 2012 & FEBRUARY 16, 2012 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Capital Improvement Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goal, Objectives and Policies Capital Improvement Element (CIE) H. CAPITAL JAIPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES [Revised text, page 2] GOAL: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF SERVICE. OBJECTIVE 1 (PUBLIC FACILITYLEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS): Identify and define types of public facilities, establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities is needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.1: [Revised text, page 2] The County shall establish standards for levels of service for public facilities, as follows: Public facilities are facilities which appear in other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial and collector roads, stff€aee wa4er_ - stormwater management systems, potable water systems, wastewater treatment systems, solid waste disposal facilities, parks and recreation facilities, and public school facilities. The standards for levels of service of County provided public facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the County, to the County's annual budget, and to the appropriate individual element of this comprehensive plan. The standards for levels of service of public facilities which are not County provided shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element of this comprehensive plan, but shall not apply to the County's annual budget. Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial furnishings and equipment, design, permitting, and construction costs. Other "capital" costs, such as motor vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual budget, but such items are not "public facilities" for the purposes of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development orders. Policy 1.2: [Revised text, page 2] The quantity of public facilities that is needed to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each public facility by the following calculation: Q= (SxD) -I. Where: "Q" is the quantity of public facility needed, "S" is the standard for level of service, "D" is the demand, such as the population, and "I" is the inventory of existing facilities. Words underlined are added; words r'^ U^n are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words deu-ble struck thmugh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Capital Improvement Element- CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 A. The calculation will be used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of future growth. The estimates of projected demand will account for demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders as well as future growth. B. The Board of County Commissioners shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) or Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on both the variable "D" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I, and the overall County transportation system. The Board shall not approve any such petition or application which would directly access a deficient roadway segment or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient, or which significantly impacts either: (1) a deficient roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment; or (2) the seasonal population based upon the Bureau of Economic and Business Research at the University of Florida (BEBR) medium range growth rate population projections, for all public facilities, for the variable "D ", unless one of the three items listed below simultaneously occurs: (-a)l. Specific mitigating stipulations are approved in conjunction with the rezone or SRA designation resolution, conditional use petition, or FLUE amendment, to restore or maintain the Level of Service on the impacted roadway segment; (b)2. The adopted population standard used for calculation of "Q" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I is amended based on appropriate relevant, appropriate and professionally accepted data and analysis; or, (03. The Schedule of Capital Improvements is updated to include any necessary projects that would support the additional public facility demand(s) created by the rezone, SRA designation resolution, conditional use petition, or amendment to the Future Land Use Element. C. Significant impact is hereby defined for Section B of this Policy as, an impact generating potential for increased countywide population greater than 2% of the population projections for parks, solid waste disposal, potable water, wastewater treatment, and drainage- stormwater management facilities, or as generating a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume of an impacted roadway. D. There are three circumstances in which the standards for levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: Words underlined are added; words dough are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words douu� are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMPAmendments Capital Improvement Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 1. Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high hazard areas are subject to all limitations and conditions in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element and Future Land Use Elements of this Growth Management Plan. 2. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and repair, remodeling and renovation, will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County Manager. 3. Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess of the standards adopted in this Growth Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any time as long as the following conditions are met: a. the facility does not make financially unfeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and b. the facility does not contradict, limit or substantially change the goals, objectives and policies of any element of this Growth Management Plan. Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of any of the factors listed in Section B or Section D of this Policy shall be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvement Element. All capital improvement projects for such public facilities shall be approved in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this Policy. Population definitions as used in this Capital Improvement Element and other elements are provided below. Permanent Population is the population projection figure based on Bureau of Economic and Business Research at the University of Florida (BEBR) medium range growth rate population projections. The population projection figure is then converted from April 1 to October 1, which is the beginning of the fiscal year for Collier County. Seasonal Population is the BEBR population figure (described above) converted to its October 1 figure, increased by 20% for all areas of the County to reflect the increase of seasonal part-time residents and visitors. Unincorporated Area Seasonal Population is the seasonal population figure (described above) for unincorporated Collier County only, adjusted to represent how seasonal residents utilize certain park facilities differently. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.4: [Previously - proposed new text retracted; revised text, pages 4, 5] Public facility improvements are to be considered in the following order or priority: Words underlined are added; words struGk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted —as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 3 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Capital Improvement Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 A. Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. C. New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of this Capital Improvement Element. In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: 1. previously approved development orders permitting redevelopment, 2. previously approved development orders permitting new development, 3. new development orders permitting redevelopment, and 4. new development orders permitting new developments. D. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. E. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1. providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or 2. providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. When further considering_ projects prioritized by this order, the higher priority shall be assigned to improvements designed to reduce, or not increase, greenhouse gas emissions through shortened vehicular trip lengths, trips taken by another mode of transportation, or by other substantive means. Policy 1.5: [Revised text, pages 5, 6, 7] The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: A. Roadways: 1. Arterials and collector roads: Level of Service indicated below on the basis of peak hour, traffic volume: Words underlined are added; words struGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMPAmendments Capital Improvement Element- CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Level of Service "E" on all six -lane roads: 2. Level of Service "D" peak hour on all other County and State arterial and collector roads not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS). B. State and Federal Roads: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for state roads vv'itt' the exeeption of these on v ii 111 fCZTtate Highway�ystem ). TV111 V1 "�IIZ1l V� — 1- l_i.O- 1sets and maintains the LOS and for I -75. The standards for I -75 are as follows: EXISTING EXISTING TRANSITIONING RURAL AREA URBANIZED AREA URBANIZED AREA I -75 BD G GD C. County Suff ee Water- Stormwater Management Systems: [Revised text, page 5] 1. Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74 -50 and 90 -10. 2. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainages- stormwater management facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as listed in the Dr-ainage,3x' *_ °r Stormwater Management Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. D. County Potable Water Systems: [Revised text, page 6] County Water District = 170 gallons per capita per day Words underlined are added; words strusk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dniuble st.mok t.h.RN* are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 5 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Capital Improvement Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft E. County Sanitary Sewer- Wastewater Treatment Systems: North Sewer Service Area = 120 gallons per capita per day South Sewer Service Area = 100 gallons per capita per day Southeast Sewer Service Area = 120 gallons per capita per day Northeast Sewer Service Area = 120 gallons per capita per day F. County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities: 3 -1 -12 [Revised text, page 6] [Revised text, page 7] 1. Two (2) years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous three (3) years. 2. Ten LUO years of permittable capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous three (3) years. G County Parks and Recreation Facilities: [Revised text, page 7] 1. Regional Park land = -2-.9 2_7 acres per 1,000 /pop. 2. Community Park land = 1.2 acres per 1,000 /pop. (unincorporated) H. Public School Facilities: 1. Elementary schools = 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment / FISH Capacity 2. Middle schools = 95 percent (0.95) of CSA Enrollment / FISH Capacity 3. High schools = 100 percent (1.00) of CSA Enrollment / FISH Capacity Words underlined are added; words dough are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words �-14-sugh are deleted —as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 6 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Capital Improvement Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 2 (FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY): Provide public facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, within the County's authority to require others to provide, or as provided by the School District within their financially feasible Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan, formally adopted by the School Board between July 1 and October 1 each year. With the exception of public school facilities, existing public facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and other intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. [Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change proposed.] Policy 2.4: [Revised text, page 8] Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e., potable water, sanitary sewef - wastewater treatment, and solid waste disposal ) may be financed by debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services, or the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue). Policy 2.5: [Revised text, page 8] Public facilities financed by non - enterprise funds (i.e., arterial and collector roads, surf ce water- - stormwater management, and parks and recreation) shall be financed from current revenues and, assets and Revenue Bonds approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Debt financing shall not be used to provide excess capacity in non - enterprise public facilities unless the excess capacity is an unavoidable result of a capital improvement that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the Schedule of Capital Improvements or for excess capacity. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 3 (PUBLIC EXPENDITURES. COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 9] Eff etive with plan implementation,4 Limit public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area to those facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element. Policy 3.1: [Revised text, page 9] The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element including, but not limited to arterial and collector roads, sanitary sewe Words underlined are added; words S'^ Gk tug„ are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words do-ble stri € are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 7 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Capital Improvement Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 service- wastewater treatment systems, potable water supply systems, :urfuee ter - stormwater management systems, solid waste collection and disposal systems, natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas, and park and recreation facilities. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 4 (PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS): Coordinate County land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements, as described in Policy 1.1 above, by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. [Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change proposed.] Policy 4.1: [Previously- proposed new text retracted; revised text, pages 10, 11] The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated annually and may also be modified as follows: A. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, 163.3187, aff-eeted by ado fie of uQ 72Q7, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities. B. Pursuant to Florida Statutes, 163.3177, affeeted by adoption of uu 72Q7', the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 4.3: [Revised text, page 11] All public facility capital improvements shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate individual eElement of this Growth Management Plan. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 4.6: [Revised text, page 11] Public facilities and services provided by Collier County with public funds in accordance with the Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element will be limited to Service Areas established within the boundaries designated on Figure PW -1 "Collier County Water District Boundaries ", and Figure PW -2 and Figu e PW 2.1 "Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas ", in the Potable Water Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element, and on Figure S4 WT -1 and Figure SS 1.1, "Collier County Sewer District Boundaries ", and Figure S&4 WT -2 and Figuf° SS 2.' , "Existing and Future mower Wastewater Words underlined are added; words struck thmugh are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 8 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Capital Improvement Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Treatment Service Areas ", in the Sanitary Sewe~ Wastewater Treatment Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. Road and Public School improvements will be provided as designated in their respective Schedule of Capital Improvements appearing in this Capital Improvement Element. All other public facilities and service types will be provided on a countywide availability basis. Policy 4.7: [Previously- proposed new text retracted; revised text, page 11] The County shall ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of life, property, and re- building cost from the effects from hurricanes, flooding, natural and technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not be limited to: a. Construction above the flood plain; b. Maintaining a protective zone for wildfire mitigation; c. Installation of on -site permanent generators or temporary generator emergency connection points; d. Beach and dune restoration, re- nourishment, or emergency protective actions to minimize the loss of structures from future events; e. Emergency road repairs; and, f. Repair and/or replacement of publicly owned docking facilities, parking areas, and sea walls. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 5 (CONCURRENCYMANAGEMENT): Ensure that public facilities, as described in Policy 1.1 above, and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. [Objective is provided for contextual purposes only; no change proposed.] Policy 5.1: [Revised text, pages 11, 12] The concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, SanitarfiexA,er- Wastewater Treatment, Drainage Stormwater Management and Solid Waste Disposal Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System is met: A. The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development_plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or B. The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued; or C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this policy. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development Words underlined are added; words str u^L through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words douhle s4r, ek thmu ah are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 9 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Capital Improvement Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 agreements pursuant to Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur, pursuant to Section 163.3180, Florida Statutes. Policy 5.2: [Revised text, page 12] The concurrency requirement for the Parks and Recreation Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System is met: A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 5.1 A, B and C is met; or B. At the time the final site development plan, final plat or building permit is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract which provides for commencement of actual construction of the required facilities within one year of the issuance of the final site development plan, final plat or building permit; or C. The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement which requires the commencement of the actual construction of the facilities within one year of the issuance of the applicable final site development plan, final plat, or building permit. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Sections 163.3220 - 163.3243, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. EAR -CIE — CCPC Transmittal FINAL DRAFT updated to February 20, 2012 — 5:17 PM G: \CDES Planning Services \Comprehensive\2011 EAR -BASED GMPAMENDMENTS \CCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendments \CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda Materials \ELEMENTS for March 1 CCPC\EAR -based Amendments—CCPC Transmittal_CIE_2.docx CS Words underlined are added; words strusk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 10 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goals, Objectives and Policies Transportation Element GOAL: [No change to text, page 13] TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES FOR BOTH THE MOTORIZED AND NON - MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 1: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 13] The County will fn Maintain the major roadway system at an acceptable Level of Service by implementing improvements as identified in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) or by working directly with other responsible jurisdictions to implement needed improvements to their facilities. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.3: [Revised text, page 13] Count-y after-ial and eelleetor- roads as well as State highways not en the Stfategie 1fitefffle System (SIS) shall be maif4ained at Level of Serviee "D" or- better- as addressed in the Implementation Stfategy of the Tr-anspeAafien Element exeept for- the roadways listed below tha been widened tee (6) lanes eannetbe widened any f4tho„ The rotmty will also adopt FDOT's LOS on feadway segments where the Geu*ty has epAer-ed k4e a TRIP (a nati are identified en Map TD 4 and Map TD n The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County arterial and collector roads appear in Policy 1.5; subsection "A" in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facilitya_pacity and the demand generated by a development. The Collier County Transportation Division shall determine the traffic volumes that correspond to the different LOS thresholds on county roads. The Transportation Division shall install, as funds permit, permanent traffic count stations to better identify traffic characteristics of county roads. Based on the traffic count data the Transportation Division shall develop a financially feasible Roads component for the Capital Improvement Program of the CIE. Words underlined are added; words strwk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words Ie st are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 1.4: [Revised text, pages 13, 14] Collier- County sets and adepts the LOS standards for- State Reads with the exception of these on the Stfategie intefmodal System (SIS). in Gollief County FDOT sets the LOS standards for- 1 75. Existing izz2d Aa!ea 1--7-5 RD EB EB The standards for levels of service (LOS) of state and federal roads in the Countyappear in Policy 1.5; subsection `B" in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development OBJECTIVE 2: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 14] The County shall "' Maintain the adopted Level of Service standard as provided for in Policy 1.3 by making the improvements identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 3: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 14] The County shall p Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights -of- way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program and/or the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long -Range Transportation Plan. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 3.3: [Revised text, page 14] The County shall acquire a sufficient amount of right -of -way to facilitate arterial and collector roads of no less than ° efess seetien of six (6) *..affl . laf es- as appropriate to meet the needs of the Long Range Transportation Plan or other adopted transportation studies, plans or programs, appropriate turn lanes, medians, bicycle and pedestrian features, drainage canals, a shoulder sufficient for pull offs, and landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right -of -way standard may be considered when it can be demonstrated, through a traffic capacity analysis, that the maximum number of lanes at build -out will be less than the standard. Policy 3.4: [Revised text, page 14] Collier County shall aequire purchase rights -of -way for transportation improvements in fee simple, unless otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners Policy 3.5: [Revised text, page 15] A. Wit1,i,, one year- efthe eff etiye date of this 0..,1, ent The County ,1,,,n r o ra adopt is implementing the he steps in developing a Thoroughfare Corridor Protection Plan (TCPP) ordinance and land development regulations that: Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words -gla are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 1. identify, in detail, corridors necessary to develop the County roadway network shown on the County's Long Range Transportation Plan; and 2. adopt Corridor Preservation Maps, Corridor Preservation Tables, Critical Intersection Maps and Critical Intersection Tables; and 3. limit the uses of land within the required corridor, appropriately plan for the location of land uses, and direct incompatible land uses away from environmentally sensitive resources; and 4. provide for an annual update of all necessary maps and tables; and 5. provide for an approval process by the Board of County Commissioners for new or expanded corridors and intersections; and 6. provide a process for advanced reservation, donation, dedication or any other means of conveyance by an affected property owner to the County for land included within protected areas. B. For the purposes of this Policy, protected thoroughfares shall include: 1. the required corridors on either side of the center line of an existing or planned roadway; or 2. required corridors for roadway or alternative transportation networks for which no centerline has been established; or 3. corridors for future roadways or alternative transportation networks which have been identified through corridor studies; or 4. protected areas at critical intersections including but not limited to proposed grade separated intersections. All of the above must be consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Transportation Plan and Chapter 336.02, Florida Statutes. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 4: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 15] The Goui+t�, shall p Provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and non - motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan. Policy 4.1: [Previously - proposed revised text rephrased to improve format as a "policy ", page 15] The County shall incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan into this Transportation Element by reference and sha4 should will periodically update the Pathways Plan as needed. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 4.5: [Revised text, page 151 The County shall, to the greatest extefft possible, identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathways Work Program. Words underlined are added; words stfuGk thfoegh are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words d-a-u-blAs 'bra-im.3h are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 3 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 4.6: [Revised text, page 15] The County shall work to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled and Greenhouse Gas Emission by providing previde -for the safe movement of non - motorized vehicles through implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and shall incorporate bike lanes, sidewalks and pathways, as deemed appropriate, in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 5: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 15] The County shall e Coordinate the Transportation System development process with the Future Land Use Map. Policy 5.1: [Revised text, previously - proposed new text retracted, pages 15, 16] The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. T, -affl . a 1 ° °° *^ a � whether. A petition or application has significant prejeet impact.: hall use the following e Qetefmine the study afea if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following g_ccur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and C. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a lmiti ag tion Pplan prepared b t�pplicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all defioipW roadways. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stFUGk-through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words ilea are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 5.3: [Previously - proposed Policy deletion retracted; revised text, page 16] In order to determine vesting, where desired, all previously approved projects must go through a vesting review pursuant to Subsection 10.02.07.13.67, of the Land Development Code Policy 5.4: [Revised text, page 16] Pursuant to Rule nr 5.0055(6)(a)3., Florida n a.,, inistfat vex ode an the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) is hereby designated. Development located within the South U.S. 41 TCEA (MapTR -4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures established in Policies 5.5 and 5.6 below, and in consideration of the following: A. Any proposed development within the concurrency exception area that would reduce the LOS on Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) roadways within the County by 5% or more of the capacity at the adopted LOS standard shall meet the transportation concurrency requirements specified in Capital Improvement Element, Policy 5.3. B. Any proposed development within the concurrency exception area that would reduce the LOS on SIS roadways within the County by less than 5% of the capacity at the adopted LOS standard and meets the requirements identified below in Policy 5.6 are exempt from the transportation requirements of Capital Improvement Element, Policy 5.3. Policy 5.5: [Revised text, pages 17, 18] Commercial developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation will provide certification &om to the Transportation Planning Department that at least four of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized: a) Preferential parking for carpools and vanpools that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development. b) Parking charge that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership. C) Cash subsidy that is expected to increase the average vehicle occupancy for work trips generated by the development and/or increase transit ridership. d) Flexible work schedules that are expected to reduce peak hour automobile work trips generated by the development. e) Compressed workweek that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and peak hour work trips generated by the development. Words underlined are added; words stFusichrough are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words 9h are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 f) Telecommuting that would be expected to reduce the vehicle miles of travel and peak hour work trips generated by the development. g) Transit subsidy that would be expected to reduce auto trips generated by the development and increase transit ridership. h) Bicycle and pedestrian facilities that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel and automobile work trips generated by the development. i) Including residential units as a portion of a commercial project that would be expected to reduce vehicle miles of travel. Residential developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that choose to obtain an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation shall R � documentation to the Transportation Planning Department that at least three of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies will be utilized: a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing transit shelters within the development (shall be coordinated with Collier County Transit). C) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities with connections to adjacent commercial properties. e) Vehicular access to adjacent commercial properties with shared commercial and residential parking. An applicant seeking an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation through the certification mentioned above shall submit an application to the Transportation Division Administrator on forms provided by the Division. Binding commitments to utilize any of the above techniques relied upon to obtain certification shall be required as a condition of development approval. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be Words underlined are added; words s#niGk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words � are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 6 .� 1- NOMITIM . _ . .. e) Vehicular access to adjacent commercial properties with shared commercial and residential parking. An applicant seeking an exception from concurrency requirements for transportation through the certification mentioned above shall submit an application to the Transportation Division Administrator on forms provided by the Division. Binding commitments to utilize any of the above techniques relied upon to obtain certification shall be required as a condition of development approval. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall, for three years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be Words underlined are added; words s#niGk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words � are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 6 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 made within this second three year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three years and in three year increments until the TDM strategies are deemed effective. Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification shall meet all concurrency requirements. Whether or not a concurrency exception is requested, developments will be subject to a concurrency review for the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development and maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network. Policy 5.6: [Revised text, pages 18, 19] The County shall designate Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provide multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in this Transportation Element, Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of this Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are designated: A. Northwest TCMA — This area is bounded by the Collier - Lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the I -75 right -of -way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (Map TR -5). B. East Central TCMA — This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road (extended) on the west side (Map TR -6). In order to be exempt from link- specific concurrence, developments within the TCMA must provide documentation to the Transportation Planning Department that at least two Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies utilized meet the criteria of the LDC. Monitoring of the use and effectiveness of the TDM strategies selected shall be included in the required annual monitoring report. Developments not required to submit an annual monitoring report shall for three years following completion of the development, provide an assessment as to the use and effectiveness of the selected strategies in a form provided by the County. Modifications to the applied TDM strategies may be made within the first three years of development if they are deemed ineffective. Modifications to the new TDM strategies may be made within this second three year period and subsequent three year periods if the TDM strategies are deemed ineffective. Another assessment shall be completed within three years and in three year increments until the TDM strategies are deemed effective. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 5.8: [Revised text, page 18] Should the TIS for a proposed development reflect that it will impact either a constrained roadway link and/or a deficient roadway link within a TCMA as determined in the most current Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), by more than a de minimis amount (more than I% Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words doublo st. are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 7 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 of the maximum service volume at the adopted LOS), yet continue to maintain the established percentage of lanes miles indicated in Policy 5.7 of this Element, a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment shall be required as follows: a. Congestion mitigation payments shall be calculated using the formula established in Rule 9J- 2.045(2)(h), Florida Administrative Code. The facility cost for a constrained roadway link shall be established using a typical lane mile cost, as determined by the Collier County Transportation Administrator, of adding lanes to a similar area/facility type as the constrained facility. b. Congestion mitigation payments shall be utilized by Collier County to add trip capacity within the impacted TCMA, road segment(s) and/or to enhance mass transit or other non - automotive transportation alternatives, which adds trip capacity within the impact fee district or adjoining impact fee district. c. Congestion mitigation payments under this Policy shall be determined subsequent to a finding of concurrency for a proposed project within a TCMA and shall not influence the concurrency determination process. d. No impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Hurricane routes in Collier County are shown on Map TR7. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. OBJECTIVE 6: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 19] The ^oumy shall e Coordinate the tTransportation eElement with the plans and programs of the state, region, and other local jurisdictions. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 6.3: [Revised text, page 19] The Coun shall be eonsistent in its intez aee into coordinate with applicable local jurisdictions with regard to operations, maintenance and capital expenditures on the County arterial /collector system within the City of Naples, Everglades City and the City of Marco Island. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 6.5: [Revised text, page 19] The Collier County MPO's adopted Long Range Plan has identified a need for- an intefohange �* ! 75 and Golden Gate Parkway and a gfade separated ever-pass at Aifp014 Pulling Read a Golden gate pafkway. The above pfejeets are now in the r,rnn rr,..,,,s..,,ftatio r.,,pr- e.,e.,.,e Pr-egfam along with the six laning of Golden gate parkway. number of potential, critical need intersections, including an interchange _in the vicinity of I -75 /Everglades Boulevard; a US- Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words do- -ble stmekthrewgh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 8 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 41 /SR -CR 951 agr de separated overpass; and, a Randall /Immokalee arg de separated overpass. The County shall that the -thee pfejec-ts- mentioned above Twill be i'eeefdinuted in design. timing and pursue such projects in a manner consistent with the findings of the AUIR and through the development of the FDOT 5 -year Work Program, as appropriate. OBJECTIVE 7: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 19] 44° County shall a Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and shall encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation through the development review process. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 7.3: [Revised text, page 20] The County shall implement, through its Land Development Code and Code of Laws and Ordinances1 the provision of safe and convenient onsite traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for both motorized and non - motorized vehicles as a primary objective in the review of Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development application review process. Coordination shall occur with County Engineering staff where traffic circulation is outside of the limits of the public ROW. Policy 7.4: [Revised text, page 20] The County shall develop corridor management plans that take into consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote "smart ro�wth" development along the major arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take into account the recommendations of the Community Character Plan, County- sponsored &smart Fgrowth initiatives, and the impacts of the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) as the Board of County Commissioners may periodically appropriate funding for these plans. The County shall consider the recommendations from the Collier County Master Mobility Plan upon its completion and shall submit those "smart growth" strategies that it determines to be appropriate for consideration as Growth Management Plan or Land Development Code Amendments. Policy 7.5: [Revised text, page 201 The County shall has developed and shall continue to effectively implement a Corridor Access Management Plans Policy through the development of individual corridor access management improvement plans. Such plans shall be are designed to make median modifications and other operational improvements, including removal of traffic signals, necessary to recapture lost capacity and enhance safety. The development of such improvement plans shall consider the impacts of the South US 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) and the two (2) Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs), as may be appropriate. OBJECTIVE 8: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 20] The r,,,,. ty shall establish are m Maintain a " Concurrency Management System" for the scheduling, funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities. Words underlined are added; words stfusk-through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 9 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 8.21: [Renumbered policy] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 9: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 21] 44ie Ceu- Ay shall e Encourage neighborhood involvement in the establishment and maintenance of safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, which are not classified as arterials or collectors through the implementation of the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). In developing strategies and measures to encourage such conditions; within the NTMP ShalL consider the impact of such strategies and measures on the adjacent arterial and collector systems (from a level -of- service and operational standpoint). * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 9.3: [Revised text, previously - proposed new text retracted, page 2 1 ] The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. An The Collier- Go . 3ftatien Division shall develop guidelines, whieh LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of two neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 10: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 22] The GeufAy shall e Encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public that remains consistent with the character of the rural areas of Collier Countv. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 11: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 23] The GetffAy shall m Maintain County owned airport facilities as attractive, efficient, safe, and environmentally compatible facilities, consistent with the approved Airport Master Plan for each Airport. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 11.2: [Revised text, page 23] The Collier County Airport Authority shall determine the most cost effective and efficient means for implementing future facility plans outlined within the airport master plans. Airport Master Plans shall be submitted to the Board of County Commissions for review and approval. Words underlined are added; words s#usk-threagh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words de uble strudk th. are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 10 EAR -based GMP Amendments * ** * ** * ** Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" Transportation Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** 3 -1 -12 OBJECTIVE 12: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 23] The rou*ty shall e Encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 12.8: [Deleted policy, page 24] Any adopted transit developmepA plan shall inelude an aeeeptable level of serviee standard * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 13: [New objective, rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 24] The G^tmty shall e Evaluate the creation of a separate Transit Element to give alternative means of transportation equal treatment within the Growth Management Plan. Policy 13.1• [New policy, phrased to augment format of preceding "objective ", page 24] The County may develop a Transit Element, a Transit Sub - Element within this Transportation Element or incorporate alternative means of transportation into the Growth Management Plan through other appropriate modifications, based upon the conclusion of the Master Mobility Plan. EAR -TE — CCPC Transmittal FINAL DRAFT updated to February 23, 2012 G:ICDES Planning ServiceMComprehensive12011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTSICCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendments\CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda MaterialslELEMENTS for March 1 CCPC1Transportation Element -CCPC- Consent- 2- 17- 12.docx MB /CS Words underlined are added; words stfask#hrGugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words st-l-I+w-gh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 11 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Wastewater Treatment Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goal, Objectives and Policies Public Facilities Element /Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element (SSS -E) M. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES [Revised text, page 2] GOAL: [Revised text, page 2] TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC BY ENSURING ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND, COST EFFECTIVE AND IMPLEMENTABLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES AND SERVICES. OBJECTIVE 1: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, previously - proposed new text retracted, page 2] The Gou*t -, will p'eme^* the following pokeies to ::: Make certain that public sector sanitary sewer service utilities provide, repair and/or replace sanitary sewer collection, treatment and disposal facilities to correct existing deficiencies in their respective service areas, as may be required to meet or exceed the Level of Service Standards established in this Plan. In addition, public sector sanitary sewer service utilities will be expanded as necessary to provide for future growth. Policy 1.1: [Previously - proposed new text retracted, page 2] Continue the development of the Collier County Water -Sewer District ukihties .— r-egulated dwough -- - _ consistent with the Capital Improvements Element to provide for future growth. Policy 1.2: [Revised text, pages 2, 3] Consistent with the growth policies of the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, provision of central sanitary sewer service by the County is limited to: the service areas shown in this Plan and depicted on the Collier County Sewer District Boundaries maps; the Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas maps (Figure $$-4 WT -1 and F-� - -Fe SS 1.11 hiel3-�a^'�the _R14; Transition Water- a � Dist iet (Fig ffe cc � a Figu e cc � �); Sending Lands within the ccx-- ccrnrvcvrcrvrsrrra .c- �rrgar�ov-z-- uiraTr�cari.. ..�..� ...��, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, is utilized; and, to areas where the County has legal commitments to provide facilities and services as of the date of adoption of this Plan. Additionally, the County, at its discretion, may serve Towns, Villages, Hamlets, and Compact Rural Developments within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA); presently, the County has no plans to serve any portion of the RLSA. This Overlay is depicted on the countywide Future Land Use Map and map series. Within the RLSA: Hamlets and Compact Rural Developments one hundred (100) acres or less in size may be served by central sewer facilities; Towns, Villages and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size are required to be served by central Words underlined are added; words StF ��, ;Feug„ are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted —as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 1 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Wastewater Treatment Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 sewer facilities; and, Compact Rural Developments that are one hundred (100) acres or less in size may be required to be served by central sewer facilities, depending upon the permitted uses within the Compact Rural Development. The private sector, Collier County, an independent wastewater authority, or some other non - County utility provider may provide these facilities. For the purposes of this pPolicy and pPolicies 1.4, 5. 1, and 5.3 of this Sub - Element, within the RLSA, the term "central sewer facilities" includes decentralized community treatment systems and innovative alternative wastewater treatment systems such as decentralized community treatment systems, provided that they meet criteria of Chapter 64E -6 F.A.C. A decentralized community wastewater treatment system shall not exceed a design capacity of 10,000 gallons per day, shall provide an advanced secondary level of treatment, and shall be operated by a public or private entity with responsibility for operations and maintenance in accordance with Chapter 64E -6 F.A.C. System facilities located on individual lots or parcels shall have a utility easement to allow for access and maintenance of the system by the operating entity. The system shall be designed to meet the adopted level of service standards set forth in Policy 2.1 of this Sub - Element. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.5: [Revised text, previously - proposed new text retracted, page 3] Collier County shall permit development of package sewage treatment plant systems in areas identified in Policy 1.2, on an interim basis until County s ppntr=.':,,.d -- -- --------- r ,-..,..,.t_. e-MA service is available. The County shall allow individual septic systems within the County only when connection to an existing central system is not within 200 lineal feet of the closest property line. In portions of the County where septic systems are allowed, at such time as County service becomes available within 200 lineal feet of the property line, said septic systems will be required to connect to the appropriate eentf ' sanitary sewe centralized wastewater treatment system. Within the Rural Lands Stewardship Overlay, consistent with Policy 1.2: septic systems are permitted within Hamlets; septic systems may or may not be permitted in Compact Rural Developments one hundred (100) acres or less in size depending upon the permitted uses in the Compact Rural Development; and, septic systems are not permitted in Towns, Villages, and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size. However, in Towns, Villages, and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size, septic systems are allowed to serve no more than 100 acres, on an interim basis only, until eentfal centralized wastewater treatment syL�em service is available. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.7: [Revised text, page 4] Where Community Development Districts, or similar special districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water -Sewer District, sewer service shall be connected to the regional system, Words underlined are added; words struGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dA, blA st are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Wastewater Treatment Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 and all facilities shall be conveyed, when acceptable, to the Collier County Water -Sewer District for operation and ownership in accordance with Collier County Ordinance Number 01 57, adopted 06teber- 23, 2 04 -31 adopted May 11, 2004, and District construction and operating policies. OBJECTIVE 2: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 4] Ensure wastewater treatment system capacity is available or will be available to serve development. Policy 2.0.1 No development order shall be issued by Collier County without demonstration that sanitary seer wastewater treatment facility capacity that meets or exceeds the minimum Level of Service Standards established herein is available or will be available to serve the development under the guidelines established for concurrency in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. Policy 2.1• [Revised text, pages 4, 5] The fellowing Level of Sefyiee (LOS) standar-ds are hereby adopted and shall be used as the basis fof detefmining the availability of faeility eapaeity and the demand generated by a develepmepAit Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words double stwk .1-a-gli are deleted -as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Wastewater Treatment Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 2.1: The levels of service standards (LOSS) for Collier County wastewater treatment facilities appear in Policy 1.5 • subsection "E" in the Capital Improvement Element * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.3: [Revised text, page 5] These LOS standards are the minimum criteria for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity of wastewater treatment facilities Policy 2.4: [Revised text, page 5] ,.�,.a by said ,., The Colli er County Water -Sewer District shall review historical sanitary sewer demand records during Collier County Wastewater Master Plan updates and adjust the LOS standards, as referenced in Policy 2 1 if needed OBJECTIVE 3: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 5] 44ie Ceun y shat t Ensure utilization of environmentally sound and economically �.� "�..,�_ =�= =tea` beneficial methods for disposal of treated sludge and septag ; and shall Aities F-Ggolatod by the, Policy 3.1: [Revised text, page 6] The County shall maintain sludge de- watering and stabilization facilities for use by County wastewater treatment operations to produce sludge de- watered and stabilized to a degree suitable for use as cover material for County landfills or to be used for any suitable manner that is permitted by law. 444v. Goonty shall ensure, t4at pfivato wastowater- 064608 mog"Hi-Med Gotmity f-01 [Previously - proposed new text retracted, page 6] _64608 rot-_"640d by the Gowfl% Shall OBJECTIVE 4: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 6] The County will confinue to p Promote the use of treated wastewater effluent for irrigation purposes in order to provide an environmentally sound disposal method and to conserve potable water and groundwater supplies by developing and implementing an integrated, comprehensive strategy for the following Ppolicies. Words underlined are added; words s#usk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words doahleA- thro, -ah are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Wastewater Treatment Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 4.6• [Revised text, page 6] The County will encourage Florida - Friendly Landscaping' to reduce the generation of Yard waste reduce water consumption and improve water quality. Section 373.185 F.S. defines Florida - Friendly Landscaping' as using _quality landscapes that conserve water, protect the environment adapt to local conditions and tolerate drought. Policy 4.7: [Revised text, Previously - proposed new text retracted, page 7] The County shall seek to expand and prioritize the availability of irrigation water from supplemental sources such as dual water systems within Community Development Districts, other special districts and Planned Unit Developments, through connection of such sources to the County's reclaimed water system `h t - e, &VA � -M RAN' handha" waw. OBJECTIVE 5: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 7] The Couny• shal l Discourage urban sprawl and the proliferation of private sector wastewater treatment utilities and sanitary sewer service suppliers in an effort to maximize the use of existing public facilities through the development order approval process by implementing the following policies. Policy 5.1: [Revised text, page 7] The County shall discourage urban sprawl by permitting universal availability of central sanitary sewer systems only: in the Designated Urban Area, in the Designated Urban -Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay, in Receiving and certain Neutral Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and in the Rural Settlement District, all of which are depicted on the Future Land Use Map, and in Towns, Villages, Hamlets, and Compact Rural Developments within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. These areas are further identified as: within the Collier County Sewer District Beundaries depicted on Figure S&4 WT -1 of the Sanitary Sewer this Sub - element, except the outlying urban areas of Immokalee, Copeland, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island, and Port of the Islands; within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, as each Town, Village, Hamlet and Compact Rural Development is designated; r- within the Rural Tr"""'+'^^ Water- and Sewer- Distr-iet Boundaries en Figufe SS 2 efthe Saffitafy Sewef Sttb element; or in Sending Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, is utilized; and, in areas where the County has legal commitments to provide facilities and service outside the Urban Area as of the date of adoption of this Plan. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words s#uGk theta are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words double st. __1. .... are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Wastewater Treatment Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 5.3: [Revised text, pages 7, 8] As provided for in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, and in Policy 1.2, central sewer facilities are permitted in Towns, Villages, Hamlets, and Compact Rural Developments. Though not anticipated, it is possible that central sanitary sewer collection lines may extend through lands not designated as a Town, Village, Hamlet or Compact Rural Development; no properties designated other than as a Town, Village, Hamlet or Compact Rural Development are permitted to connect to these collection lines. Under criteria, properties may be eligible for central sanitary sewer service from (' oll r,,,,,,, -, Utilities ��••- - ....�- -Q��oa an existing public or private seEter utility Of independent distf et, within the Receiving Areas identified in the Rural-T-fansitien A4ter- Collier County Sewer District, depicted on the Collier County Sewer District Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas map (Figure SzS-2 WT -1) of the Samna,. Sewer WastewaterTreatment Sub - element, subject to availability. Qualifying criteria shall be limited to the requirements and incentives established in the Future Land Use Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Elements of this Plan to obtain preservation standards established for environmentally sensitive lands in the Sending Areas of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. Criteria for central sanitary sewer or wastewater treatment service eligibility may include, but are not limited to, plans for development, which utilize creative planning techniques such as clustering, density blending, rural villages, and TDRs from identified environmentally sensitive areas. Criteria for eligibility may be amended and additional Sending and Receiving Lands may be designated in the future. Central Sanitary Sewer or wastewater treatment collection lines; within the- Rufal T-fansition Water and Sewer- Distr-iet., may extend through Sending Lands; however, no properties designated as Sending Lands may connect to the collection lines. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** MAP CHANGES: 1. Figure SS -1.1, Collier County Sewer District Boundaries • This map has the same title as Figure SS -1 and is incorrect. This map, and references to it in Policies, are to be deleted. 2. Figure SS -2.1, Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas • This map has the same title as Figure SS -2 and is incorrect. This map, and references to it in Policies, are to be deleted. 3. Figure SS -1, Collier County Sewer District Boundaries This map is referenced in multiple Policies and is incorrect. The references to this map are to be changed to reference "Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas" since the District Boundaries are included. This map is to be re- titled. 4. Figure SS -2, Existing and Future Sewer Service Areas Words underlined are added; words stFUGk threugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words do, teu� are deleted —as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 6 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Wastewater Treatment Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 This map is referenced in the same Policies as Figure SS -1 and is to be updated to the 2008 Wastewater Master Plan Figure 1 -1 (attached). Similar= wa an, W L_ added Systems ovaf-se@a by t1i'- 5. Figure SS -3, North Sewer Service Area • This map is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and is to be deleted. 6. Figure SS -4, South Sewer Service Area • This map is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and is to be deleted. 7. Table SS -14, Capital Improvement Projects FY 2003 -2007 • This table is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and is specific to the Collier County Water -Sewer District. For those reasons, this table is to be deleted. EAR - Wastewater Treatment Sub -E — CCPC Transmittal DRAFT updated to February 20, 2012 — 4:35 PM G:ICDES Planning ServiceslComprehensive12011 EAR -BASED GMPAMENDMENTSICCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendments\CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda Matehals\ELEMENTS for March 1 CCPCIEAR -based Amendments—CCPC Transmittal—Sanitary Sewer_2.docx CS Words underlined are added; words stntGk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words d-A-uh-la- s- are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 7 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Potable Water Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goal, Objectives and Policies Public Facilities Element/Potable Water Sub - Element (PWS -E) GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES pAtnhl X77 ta, C 4 Elo„.o„t [Revised text, page 2] GOAL: TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC BY ENSURING ACCESS TO ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND, COST EFFECTIVE AND IMPLEMENTABLE POTABLE WATER FACILITIES AND SERVICES. OBJECTIVE 1: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 2] The County shall ' Locate and develop potable water supply sources to meet the future needs of the County owned and operated systems, said supply sources meeting the minimum Level of Service Standards established by this Plan. The development and utilization of new potable water supply sources and the acquisition of land necessary for such development shall be based upon the information, guidelines and procedures identified within the County's Ten -Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan (as updated u^ "l y'), the Collier- r,,,,.,t y Wa4er- e Master- D, u „„ ul f and the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan prepared by the South Florida Water Management District. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** textbreak * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.3: [Revised text, page 2] The County shall continue to identify sufficient quantities of water sources to meet the County's estimated growth- related needs. County's demands include raw water- from 14 ,*hva uvay 7 A qL1F V1 (I 1t V1Idi t Aquifer- C t ) a Lower 14a-, 4he Aquifer (Florida Aquifer- System), identified within tI Count_'. 2005 Water- Master pefmindby the State, fneet the County's needs. The County shall seek supply from all permissible sources of raw water cited in the Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan to meet the County's needs. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.5: [Revised text, page 2] The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District in the development of the Water Master- Plan U-pd to Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan, which is the primary planning document for the Collier County Water- Sewer- Dist..:, t Policy 1.6: [Revised text, page 2] The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District to produce future plans for water supply as described within the Wa4er Mastef Plan U-pd Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan that ensure the County's ability to maintain its stated Level of Service standard. Words underlined are added; words 6tr64 through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words do, le str, elki tlhirw* are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Potable Water Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 2: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 3] The Couny , shall , ..leme„t the _ fell„••,:.., pehe:es to -,: Make certain that public sector potable water service utilities provide, repair and/or replace potable water supply, treatment and distribution facilities to correct existing deficiencies in their respective service areas as may be required to meet or exceed the Level of Service Standards established in this Plan. In addition, ex and public sector potable water service utilities shall he exp.,n ea as necessary to provide for future growth, as provided for in the following policies. Policy 2.1: [Revised text, previously - proposed new text retracted, page 3] The Collier County Water -Sewer District shall continue the development of a Collier County Regional Potable Water System consistent with the Capital Improvement Element and the Collier C,.w ty Water- Sewer- Master Ten -Year Water Facilities Work Plan to correct existing deficiencies and provide for future growth. Policy 2.2: [Revised text, page 3] Consistent with the growth policies of the Future Land Use Element of this Plan, provision of central potable water service by the County is limited to the service areas shown in this Plan and depicted on the Collier County Water District Boundaries Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas maps (Figure PW -1 and Figufe -W 1-)-); the Existing a Fu -V r° potable Water 'ccrruTZCCar�rvzavz�. —� r acvi Szrviee Areas maps (Fig re PW 2 and Figuf PW 7 1) whieh ineludes the T?uf l T- +: Water and Sewer- Di tr:^t; and; to areas where the County has legal commitments to provide facilities and services as of the date of adoption of this Plan. Additionally, the County may serve Towns, Villages, Hamlets, and Compact Rural Developments within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay at the County's discretion; presently, the County has no plans to serve any portion of the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. This Overlay is depicted on the countywide Future Land Use Map and map series. Within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay: Hamlets and those Compact Rural Developments one hundred (100) acres or less in size may be served by central potable water facilities; Towns, Villages, and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size are required to be served by central potable water facilities; and, Compact Rural Developments one hundred (100) acres or less in size may be required to be served by central potable water facilities, depending upon the permitted uses within the Compact Rural Development. These facilities may be provided by the private sector, an independent water authority, or some other non - County utility. For the purposes of this pPolicy and pPolicies 2.4, 5. 1, and 5.3, within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, the term "central potable water facilities" includes decentralized community treatment systems. Innovative alternative water treatment systems such as decentralized community treatment systems shall not be prohibited by this pPolicy provided that they meet all applicable regulatory criteria. Words underlined are added; words stfusk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dMid-W8 rOWN-k. threwo are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Potable Water Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.4: [Revised text, previously - proposed new text retracted, page 4] Collier County shall permit development of potable water supply systems as follows: within the Designated Urban Areas of the Plan, including the outlying urban areas of Immokalee, Copeland, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island, and Port of the Islands; within the areas depicted on the Collier County Water District Bodes Existing and Future Potable Water Service Area map (Figure PW-1); within the Eycisting and Fu4ufe Potable Water- Sen,iee Afeas fnap (Figure PW 2), whie ine-ludes the -Roufal T-fan,itien Water- and o&Per- Distnz; in Sending Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, is utilized; in Towns, Villages, Hamlets and Compact Rural Developments within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay; and, in areas where the County has legal commitments to provide facilities and services as of the date of adoption of this Plan. For lands located within the Collier County Water -Sewer District, but in which County water service is not currently available, non - County potable water supply systems shall only be allowed on an interim basis until County service is available. ' Individual potable water supply wells may be permitted within the areas depicted on the Collier County Water District Boundaries Existing and Future Potable Water Service Area map (Figure PW -1) on an interim basis until County water service is available; individual potable water supply wells may be permitted in all Urban designated areas outside of the areas depicted on Figure PW -1 on an interim basis until a centralized potable water supply system is available; individual potable water- supply wells may be permitted in the R:ufal T-fansifien Water- and Sewer- an interim basis until available; individual potable water supply wells uaa a County may be permitted in Sending Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, is utilized, on an interim basis until County water service is available; and, individual potable water supply wells may be permitted on lands outside of the Urban designated areas, outside of areas depicted on Figure PW -1, and outside of Towns, Villages and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay - all areas where potable water supply systems are not anticipated. However, individual potable water supply wells may or may not be permitted within Compact Rural Developments one hundred (100) acres or less in size, depending upon the uses permitted within the Compact Rural Development. Also, in Towns, Villages, and those Compact Rural Developments greater than one hundred (100) acres in size, potable water supply wells are allowed to serve no more than 100 acres, on an interim basis only, until central a centralized potable water supply system service is available. Policy 2.5: [Revised text, page 5] The County shall continue enforcement of ordinances requiring connection of existing and new development to central potable water systems when they become available. Connections to a central system shall be made pursuant to Collier County Ordinance 01 -73, adopted December 11, 2001, as amended. Words underlined are added; words s#uGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words de-Alt; striue are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Potable Water Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 2.6: [Revised text, page 5] Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water -Sewer District, water service shall be connected to the regional system, and internal facilities shall be conveyed, when acceptable, to the Collier County Water - Sewer District for operation and ownership in accordance with Collier County Ordinance 01 57; adopted Oeteber- 23, 2001 04 -31, adopted May 11, 2004, or its latest revision, and District construction and operating policies. OBJECTIVE 3: [Revised text, page 5] Pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, F.S., including any amendments thereto, ro"i °r County has implemented pr-eeedufes to ensure that at the time a development order is issued, potable water facility capacity that meets or exceeds the minimum Level of Service LOS Standards established herein is available or will be available to serve the development under the guidelines established for concurrency in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. Policy 3.1: [Revised text, previously - proposed new text retracted, page 5] The following Level of Sefviee Standards are hereby adopted and shall be used as the basis detefmining the availability of faeilit-y eapaeity and the demand genefated by a development.: The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County potable water systems, ''�� ,.. 1 U1i appear in Policy 1.5; subsection "D" in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be Words underlined are added; words stFuGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words �� are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 M. The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County potable water systems, ''�� ,.. 1 U1i appear in Policy 1.5; subsection "D" in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be Words underlined are added; words stFuGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words �� are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Potable Water Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. Policy 3.2: [Revised text, page 6] In order to ensure that the Level of Sen4ee S*anda LOS standards contained in Policy 3.1 are maintained, methodologies for determining available capacity and demand shall incorporate appropriate peak demand coefficients for each facility and for the type of development proposed. Policy 3.3: [Revised text, page 6] The Level of Sefyiee Stan a LOS standards contained in Policy 3.1 are the minimum criteria for replacement, expansion or increase in capacity of potable water supply facilities. Policy 3.4: [Revised text, page 6] i-dioa od by the The Collier County Water -Sewer District shall review historical potable water demand records during Collier County Wastewater Master Plan updates and adjust the LOS standards, as referenced in Policy 3.1 if needed. OBJECTIVE 4: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 6] The County shall all eenti ue to p Promote conservation of potable water supplies by developing and implementing an integrated, comprehensive conservation strategy which will identify specific consumption per capita goals. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 4.5: [Revised text, page 6] Where Community Development Districts, or other similar special districts are established to provide a tool for developers to finance infrastructure or other purposes, wholly or partially within the Collier County Water -Sewer District, and where such districts make provisions for irrigation via dual systems utilizing effluent and/or other irrigation sources, said systems shall be connected to the regional system when available, and all internal irrigation systems shall remain in private ownership and be master metered by the County in accordance with Collier County Ordinance Number 04 -31, adopted May 11 2004. Policy 4.6: [Revised text, page 7] The County shall pfomete the use of xer-iseape teohniques (landseaping method that emph water- eeasen,a4ien in its use of drought resistant laiidseaping) to minimize potable water- use The County will encourage Florida- Friendly Landscaping TM to reduce the generation of yard waste, reduce water consumption, and improve water quality. Section 373.185, F S defines Florida - Friendly Landscaping' as using _quality landscapes that conserve water, protect the environment, adapt to local conditions and tolerate drought. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words s#usk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words a�eagh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Potable Water Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 OBJECTIVE 5: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 7] The Geufit . shall a Discourage urban sprawl and the proliferation of private sector potable water service suppliers in an effort to maximize the use of existing public facilities through the development order approval process by implementing the following else ° . Policy 5.1: [Revised text, page 7] The County shall discourage urban sprawl by permitting universal availability of central potable water systems only: in the Designated Urban Area, in Receiving and certain Neutral Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, in the Designated Urban -Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay, and in the Rural Settlement District, all of which are depicted on the Future Land Use Map, and in Towns, Villages, Hamlets and Compact Rural Developments within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay. These areas are further identified as: within the Collier County Water District Boundaries on Figure PW -1 of the Potable Water Sub - element, except the outlying urban areas of Immokalee, Copeland, Chokoloskee, Plantation Island, and Port of the Islands; of within the Rufal T-fansition Water- and Sewer- Distfiet Boundaries on Figure PW 2 of the Peta Water Sub element; or in Sending Lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District when Density Blending, as provided for in the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, is utilized; within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, as each Town, Village, Hamlet, and Compact Rural Development is designated; and, in areas where the County has legal commitments to provide facilities and service outside the Urban Area as of the date of adoption of this Plan. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 5.4: [Revised text, page 8] Under criteria, projects may be eligible for central potable water service from Gollief County Utilities, of an existing_ public or private seeter4independent distfiet,:,A,ithift (Figu,.° PAr 2) of this Potable Water Sub element, utiliM subject to availability. Qualifying criteria shall be limited to the requirements and incentives established in the Future Land Use Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Elements of this Plan to obtain preservation standards established for environmentally sensitive lands in the Sending Lands of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District ( RFMUD). Criteria for potable water service eligibility may include, but are not limited to, plans for development, which utilize creative planning techniques such as clustering, density blending, rural villages, and transfer of development rights (TDRs) from RFMUD Sending Lands. Criteria for eligibility may be amended and additional Sending and Receiving Lands may be designated in the future. Central Potable Water distribution lines, within the Rural Transition Water and Sewer District, may extend through Sending Lands; however, no properties designated as Sending Lands are permitted to connect to the distribution lines. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** page break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stFuGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words doh® are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 6 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Potable Water Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 MAP CHANGES: 1. Figure PW -1.1, Collier County Water District Boundaries • This map has the same title as Figure PW -1 and is incorrect. This map, and references to it in Policies, are to be deleted. 2. Figure PW -1.2, Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas • This map has the same title as Figure PW -2 and is incorrect. This map, and references to it in Policies, are to be deleted. 3. Table PW 8, Capital Improvement Projects FY 2003 -2022 • This table is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and is specific to the Collier County Water -Sewer District. For those reasons, this table is to be deleted. 4. Figure PW -1, Collier County Water District Boundaries This map is referenced in multiple Policies and is incorrect. The references to this map are to be changed to reference "Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas" since the District Boundaries are included. This map is to be re- titled. 5. Figure PW -2, Existing and Future Potable Water Service Areas = This map is referenced in the same Policies as Figure PW -1 and is to also be updated to be identical to the 2008 Water Master Plan Figure 1 -1. Similar= maps are to be Qaaaa F4 6. Figure PW -3, Potable Water Treatment and Transmission Facilities • This map is not referenced in any Objective or Policy and is to be deleted. EAR - Potable Water Sub -E — CCPC Transmittal DRAFT updated to February 20, 2012 — 4:41 PM G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive12011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTSICCPC transmittal . EAR -based GMP amendments\CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda Materials\ELEMENTS for March 1 CCPCIEAR -based Amendments_CCPC Transmittal—Potable Water- 2.docx CS Words underlined are added; words strusk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double enderlined are added; words de ffble gh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 7 EAR -based GMP Amendments Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" Stormwater Management Sub - Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goal, Objectives and Policies Public Facilities Element/Drainage Sub - Element (DS -E) GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES [Revised text, page 3] GOAL: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 3] COLLIER COUNTY cu n r T TO PROVIDE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND SERVICES FOR DRAINAGE AND FLOOD PROTECTION FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT, MINIMIZE THE DEGRADATION OF QUALITY OF RECEIVING WATERS AND SURROUNDING NATURAL AREAS AND PROTECT THE FUNCTIONS OF NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS. OBJECTIVE 1 (CAPITAL FACILITYPLANNING FOR DRAINAGE SYSTEMS): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 3] The County shall Utilize the Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) process to update the Dfainage A41as Maps County Geographic Information System and Channel /Structure Inventory components of the adopted Water Management Master Plan and to verify the existing watershed basin boundaries within Collier County. The County will also verify the design storm capacity of the drainage facilities within each basin, and determine the costs necessary to maintain the facility capacities to selected design storm standards. This information shall be used to program operational funds in the Annual County Budget and to identify necessary capital projects and basin studies in the Annual Capital Improvement Element U update and A amendment. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.2: [Revised text, page 3] County drainage system and stormwater management network capital facility planning shall be designed to implement procedures and projects in a manner to ensure that adequate stormwater management facility capacity is available at the time a development permit is issued, or that such capacity will be available when needed to serve the development. Policy 1.3: [Revised text, page 3] The County shall continue to develop public drainage facilities and stormwater management network, which maintain the groundwater table as a source of recharge for the County's potable water aquifers, provide a source of irrigation water for agricultural, horticultural and golf course operations and provide water to native vegetation. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words strusk thfough are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words ble are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Stormwater Management Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 OBJECTIVE 2: Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 4] The C,., n, y shall Maintain adopted drainage level of service standards for basins and sub - basins identified in the Water Management Master Plan. Maintenance of the drainage level of service (LOS) identified for each basin will be implemented through the watershed management planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 2.1• [Revised text, pages 4, 5, 6] The following levels of service for- drainage are her -eb -- c'ldopt°`lcd for- the v e of issuing level of serviee will be modified, A waffanted. MAIN GOLDEN GATE SYSTEM Main Golden Gate Canal Basin _D Gypfess Canal Basin D Harvey Canal Basin D 175 Gan al Basin D Green Can-' rl E Aifpert Read Canal South Basin D Gerkser-ew Canal Basin n a n e TFee C , �l O 951 Canal Centfal Basin G DISTRICT NO. 6 SYSTEM Reek Cr-eek Basin Lely Main Canal Basin D Haldeman Greek Basin D 'IT; ParL Oiiflpt RAQM D Ill r.� Words underlined are added; words stFUsk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words �€I��h are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Stormwater Management Sub - Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft fift-1 MISCELLANEOUS INTERIOR WETLAND SYSTEMS Cer-kser-ew Slough Basin D 3 -1 -12 Policy 2.1: The levels of service standards (LOSS) for drainage facilities and stormwater mana ement systems appear in Policy 1.5• subsection "C" in the Capital Improvement Element * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 3: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 6] The County shall "' Maintain and annually update a five -year schedule of capital improvements for water management facilities in conformance with the annual review process described within the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan. Words underlined are added; words stnlsl t#Feug# are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dam ibis stFu€I(t#€ are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 3 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Stormwater Management Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 3.4: [Revised text, page 6] County improvements to, and maintenance of, existing drainage facilities shall be a priority over new construction projects in the urban and estates designated areas_ (exel sive of Southern Golden Gate Estates is no longer open to development, so no facilities have priority there). OBJECTIVE 4: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, pages 6, 7] The County shall a Develop and maintain policies and programs to correct existing deficiencies and to provide for future facility needs in accordance with the annual work program referenced in the adopted Water Management Master Plan. Policy 4.1: [Revised text, page 7] Water- management pr-ejeets shall be tmdertaken in aeeor-danee with the sehedule pfevided in Capital T .t.. e.e.t Element of this Plan. TL--- r- -j - - t- shall be . 1t L in eeer-dinati with Cypress rr the Big Z /C tl T1.. id Water_M Management Dis t. et G County capital stormwater management projects shall be undertaken in accordance with the schedule provided in the Capital Improvement Element of this Plan. These projects shall be undertaken in coordination with the Big Cypress Basin Strategic Plan. Policy 4.2• [Revised text, page 7] Collier County shall correct existing deficiencies and provide for future water management facility needs through the formulation and implementation of an annual work programs. In order to implement the annual work program, the County shall encourage the use of innovative funding mechanisms including, but not limited to special taxing or assessment districts. Policy 4.3: [Revised text, page 7] The County shall develop and maintain a stormwater management public awareness program, which will include, but not necessarily be limited to, a Collier County Stormwater Management website. The primary purpose of this program shall be to provide information regarding the County's stormwater management programs to the general public including, but not limited to, the environmental enhancements that will result from the use of total water management concepts within the existing drainage and stormwater management network. OBJECTIVE 5: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 7] The G,,,, f" shall eent.r„e to : Regulate land use and development in a manner that protects the functions of natural drainage features, the stormwater management network and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the Watershed Management Planning process identified within Goal 2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan, and with relevant provisions contained within the adopted Land Development Code (Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended). Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words ddesuble stme.....m.h are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Stormwater Management Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 5.2: [Revised text, page 7] Based upon the periodic review described in Policy 5. 1, the County shall develop any appropriate new ordinances and regulations that are necessary to ensure protection of the functions of natural drainage features, the stormwater management network and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas. OBJECTIVE 6: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 7] The County shall p Protect the functions of natural drainage features through the application of standards that address the quality and quantity of discharge from stormwater management systems. Implementation of this Objective will be consistent with the watershed management planning process identified within Goal 2 and Objective 2.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Growth Management Plan. This objective is made measurable through the following policies: * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 6.2: [Revised text, page 8] Collier County's retention and detention requirements shall be the same as one hundred and fifty percent (150%) of those provided in the South Florida Water Management District's ref Revie Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual, Volume IV, 2009, as it existed at the time of project approval. Policy 6.3: [Revised text, pages 8, 9] Allowable off -site discharge rates shall be computed using a storm event of 3 day duration and 25 year return frequency. The allowable off -site discharge rates are as follows: a. Airport Road North Sub -Basin 0.04 cfs /acre (North of Vanderbilt Beach Road) b. Airport Road South Sub -basin 0.06 cfs /acre (South of Vanderbilt Beach Road) c. Cocohatchee Canal Basin 0.04 cfs /acre d. Lely Canal Basin 0.06 cfs /acre e. Harvey Basin 0.055 cfs /acre f. Wiggins Pass Basin 0.13 cfs /acre g. All other areas 0.15 cfs /acre The County may exempt projects from these allowable off -site discharge rates if any of the following applies: Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words d-oat a g# are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 5 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Stormwater Management Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 1. The project is exempt from allowable off -site discharge limitations pursuant to Section 40E- 400.315, FAC. 2. The project is part of an existing SFWMD permit, which allows discharge rates different than from those listed above. 3. It can be documented that the project currently discharges off -site at a rate higher than those listed above do. The documentation required for this purpose shall be prepared by a registered professional engineer, and will consist of an engineering study which utilizes the applicable criteria in the " SFWMD Basis of Review f EfFvi- .., en+�„i Reso � fee no.ffli n Applioations Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual, Volume IV, 2009 ". The study shall be subject to review and approval by the County and SFWMD staff. The study shall include the following site - specific information: a. Topography b. Soil types and soil storage volume c. Vegetation types d. Antecedent conditions e. Design rainfall hydrograph f. Depression storage capacity g. Receiving water hydrograph, and h. Other r-eleva relevant appropriate and professionally accepted hydrologic and hydraulic data. Using the above information, a hydrologic and hydraulic model shall be developed which demonstrates the higher off -site discharge rate. EAR - Stormwater Management Sub -E — CCPC Transmittal DRAFT updated to February 20, 2012 — 5:02 PM G: \CDES Planning Services \Comprehensive\2011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTS \CCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendments \CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda Materials \ELEMENTS for March 1 CCPC \EAR -based Amendments—CCPC Transmittal_Drainage_2.docx CS Words underlined are added; words ugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words P-4nNA th are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 6 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Solid Waste Disposal Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goal, Objectives and Policies Public Facilities Element/Solid Waste Sub - Element (SWS -E) GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES C (1T TTl �I4 STE SUB ELEMENT [Revised text, page 2] GOAL: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 2] TO PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT AND ECONOMICAL BALANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SERVICES THAT WILL ENABLE THE PEOPLE OF COLLIER COUNTY TO MEET THE ESTABLISHED REQUIREMENTS FOR SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AND MANAGEMENT IN A MANNER TO THAT ASSURES PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY AND TO PROTECTS THE AIR,, WATER AND LAND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES OF COLLIER COUNTY. IN ALL ASPECTS OF SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT TO ADHERE TO THE FOLLOWING ENDURING GUIDING PRINCIPLES APPROVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AT THE INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY WORKSHOP OF DECEMBER 2006: ENVIRONMENTAL AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE — ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MEANS MANAGING THE IMPACTS TO THE AIR, SOIL, WATER, AND WILDLIFE AS WELL AS "QUALITY OF LIFE" IMPACTS TO THE COMMUNITY SUCH AS AESTHETICS, ODOR, NOISE, AND TRAFFIC AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT COMPLIANCE MEANS SATISFYING THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS REPORTED IN THE ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT FOR BOTH LINED AND PERMITTED DISPOSAL CAPACITY; AIRSPACE PRESERVATION - AIRSPACE PRESERVATION MEANS MANAGING SOLID WASTE UPSTREAM FROM DISPOSAL AS A MEANS TO EXTEND THE REMAINING AIRSPACE (DISPOSAL) CAPACITY AT THE COLLIER COUNTY LANDFILL; OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE - OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE MEANS OPTIMIZING THE OPERATIONS OF OUR ASSETS SUCH AS THE COLLIER COUNTY LANDFILL AND OUR RECYCLING CENTERS AS WELL AS THE PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DIVISION; AND BEST VALUE SERVICE - BEST VALUE SERVICE MEANS THAT THE SERVICES OFFERED IN THE COUNTY REFLECT LOCAL AND REGIONAL CONDITIONS AND THAT THE VALUE OF SERVICE IS APPROPRIATELY BALANCED WITH THE COST OF SERVICE. A COMPONENT OF BEST VALUE SERVICE IS THAT THERE IS A DIRECT CORRELATION BETWEEN THOSE THAT RECEIVE THE BENEFITS AND THOSE THAT PAY FOR THE SERVICES. Words underlined are added; words stFUGk thmugb are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words doi ble stp, ok thFGU@4 are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Solid Waste Disposal Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 OBJECTIVE 1 (COLLECTION): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 2] Celli entinee to Maintain a safe, dependable and efficient solid waste collection system. Present facilities meeting the current Level of Service include two (2) franchise collection areas and twee five Recycling Centers, as follows: a. Unincorporated County service area; b. Immokalee service area; and, c. Thee -(3) Five 5 Recycling Centers; 1. Naples Recycling Center 2. Marco Recycling Center 3. Carnestown Recycling Center 4. Immokalee Recycling Center 5. North Collier Recycling Center Policy 1.1: [Revised text, page 2] The County shall continue to maintain and regulate commercial, multi- family and tax -bill based residential collection costs to ensure efficient and dependable service affordable to all users. The primary components of a solid waste collection assessment are: 1. Franchisee Contract 2. Tipping 3. Administrative and Capital Program Costs * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.4: [Revised text, page 2] The County shall enstffe publie awareness and paftieipatien in solid waste eelleetion issues--by addressing sueh issues in duly notieed p4lie meetings. The County shall ensure public awareness and participation in solid waste recycling, reuse, waste reduction, household hazardous waste collection and disposal. OBJECTIVE 2 (DISPOSAL): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 2] Utilize safe and efficient methods for environmentally sound disposal of solid waste in accordance with local, State and Federal regulations and shall eenti ue to investigate improved methods and implement practices that meet this eObjective. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stFUsk t#reug# are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words double stnuet#r are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Solid Waste Disposal Sub - Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 2.4: [Revised text, previously - proposed new text retracted, page 3] By file , .or- 2010, t The County shall u,., uir-° ^aver fetain the pursue the acquisition of land inventory required for future solid waste operations, based upon selection of, including but not limited to, one or more of the following options in order of priority: 1. Develop the means to partially or completely divert solid waste from the landfill (additional recycling or alternative forms of disposal). 2. Increase the permissible elevation of the Maples Collier County Landfill so as to gain additional airspace capacity 3. Explore emerging conversion technologies that would allow for continued solid waste disposal operations within Collier County. 4. Secure and utilize additional capacity at a landfill or landfills. Policy 2.5: [Revised text, page 3] The Level of Sefviee for- Solid Waste Sub Element shall bez a. Tons of selid waste per- eapita pef year-, used to determine landfill disposal eapaei ",* based on the average of the last three eomplete fiseal years aetual lined eel! tonnage The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County solid waste disposal facilities appear in Policy 1.5; subsection "F" in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facility capacity and the demand generated by a development. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.8: [Revised text, page 4] The Collier County Solid Waste Management Department shall continue to operate and maintain a hazardous waste collection faeilit facilities. The facility shall operate five (5) days per week aad will accept household hazardous wastes. Additionally, the Department shall continue to hold special events, such as its hazardous waste collection day, at least 1-,Vi e e targeting residential households bu4 also and allowing small businesses to participate to insure consumer demand is met. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stfusk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words doa-ble� are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Solid Waste Disposal Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 2.9• (prev. 2.14) [Introduced new text provision, page 4] The County shall maintain an effective emergency storm debris cleanup plan, and identify and establish temporary debris storage and reduction sites. Policy 2.10: (prev. 2.18) [Introduced new text provision, page 4] The Countv shall pursue State and Federal grants for and participate in feasibility projects for the investigation and development of improved techniques for waste collection, recycling, transfer and solid waste management consistent with the Enduring Guiding Principles. Policy 2.11• (prev. 2.24) [Introduced new text provision, page 41 The County _shall evaluate options to beneficially recycle plastic agricultural film. Policy 2.12: (prev. 2.25) [Introduced new text provision, page 4] The County shall assess the feasibility of expanding the Immokalee Transfer Station, or developing a new facility to serve the Immokalee area to become a full service recycling and reuse center equipped with such options as household hazardous waste processing, paint reuse, vegetative and yard waste drop -off, processing and composting white goods drop -off, e -waste drop -off, furniture and construction & demolition debris (C &D), resale store, etc Policy 2.13: (prev. 2.28) [Introduced new text provision, page 4] The County will work with local institutions schools government buildings or churches, to initiate programs for solid waste reduction reuse and recycling for their communities. Policy 2.14: (prev. 2.30) [Introduced new text provision, page 41 The County will encourage the construction of Green Buildings (or Sustainable Buildings). Relative to solid waste management, this includes: • Recycled Content: Products with identifiable recycled content including postindustrial content with a preference for post consumer content. • Salvaged refurbished or remanufactured• Includes saving a material from disposal and renovating repairing restoring or eg nerally improving the he appearance performance quality, functionality or value of a product. • Reusable or recyclable: Select materials that can be easily dismantled and reused or recycled at the end of their useful life. • Recycled or recyclable product packaging: Products enclosed in recycled content or recyclable packaging. • Durable: Materials that are longer lasting or are comparable to conventional products with long life fe expectancies. OBJECTIVE 3 (RECYCLEAND RECOVERY): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 41 The Collier- County Solid Waste Depaftment shall eentinue to Maintain and update the Integrated Solid Waste Master Management Strategic Plan as directed by the Board of County Commissioners. Words underlined are added; words struck thmugb are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words deubls struck- ugb are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Solid Waste Disposal Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 3.1: [Revised text, page 4] The Collier County Solid Waste Management Department shall continue to maintain and improve programs to reduce the amount of solid waste that requires disposal at County landfills by: a. Maintaining and enhancing the current countywide residential recycling programs. b. Maintaining and enhancing the current c-County -wide multi - family residential recycling program. c. Maintaining and enhancing the eCounty -wide commercial business recycling programs. d. Maintaining and enhancing the curb -side separation of material into recyclable categories to be received at the material recovery facilities. e. Continuing to explore additional measures for waste reduction. Policy 3.2: [Revised text, page 4] The County shall continue investigation and implementation of cost - saving measures for County disposal operations. The County shall evaluate other measures, including landfill mining, as new technologies and practices emerge. (C:::: en ly, a methane -gas eeneetion pfegr-am -ice operation.) * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 3.4: [Revised text, page 5] The County will eneour-age Xer-iseape landseaping (or- Sustainable Landseaping) to r-eduee the landseapin with slow gr-ewing, drought tolerant plants to eofisen,e waatpw And -r-P, The County will encourage Florida- Friendly Landscaping to reduce the generation of yard waste reduce water consumption and improve water quality. Section 373.185, F S defines Florida - Friendly Landscaping' as using _quality landscapes that conserve water, protect the environment, adapt to local conditions and tolerate drought. Policy 3.5: [Introduced new text provision, page 5] The County shall develop and implement innovative programs to reduce re -use and recycle solid waste to meet the 2020 Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) seventy -five percent (75% ) Recycling Rate pursuant to Chapter 403.7032 FS EAR -Solid Waste Disposal Sub -E — CCPC Transmittal DRAFT updated to February 20, 2012 — 4:57 PM G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive12011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTSICCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendments=PC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda MaterialslELEMENTS for March 1 CCPCIEAR -based Amendments —CCPC Transmittal —Solid Waste_2.docx CS Words underlined are added; words struGk theugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words doiAlA stp i€k thFaugh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goal, Objectives and Policies Public Facilities Element/Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element (NGWAR) GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES [Revised text, page 1] l A_ - A T G O TATT W A TER AQ TIFER RECHARGE A RGE S B ELEMENT GOAL: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 1] TI4E COUr1TYIs4Alz TO IDENTIFY AND PROTECT NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE AREAS FROM ACTIVITIES THAT COULD DEGRADE AND /OR CONTAMINATE THE QUALITY OF GROUNDWATER. OBJECTIVE 1 (MAPPING AND DELINEATION OF RECHARGE AREAS): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 1] 44ie County shall eentinue to Review every two three years, and revise as necessary, existing map delineations of County potable water wellfields that are most sensitive to contamination from nearby land development and other surface activities. The biennial three -ear review and any subsequent map revisions will be based on geologic, hydrogeologic, hydrologic, and updated anthropogenic contaminant data aggregated since the previous revision. Policy 1.1: [Revised text, page 1 ] The County shall revise and update its 3- dimensional computer models of gerund w groundwater flow around public water supply wellfields, as additional data (e.g., withdrawal rates, numbers and locations of wells within wellfields, and hydrogeologic information) become available. Poliey 1.2-- [Unchanged text, page I] The Coun-ty shall iden - potable - A,ater- welffields, poi4iens of . elffields-, eaused by adjaeent or- near-by land uses, drainage pat4erns, geomoFphie eenditions, soi4 This infoFmation shall be revised and updated as neeessai7y, Policy 1.3: [Revised text, page 1] The County shall maintain and update data on existing land uses and land use activities that possess the greatest potential for groundwater contamination. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.5: [Revised text, page I] This Sub - Element shall incorporate by reference annual recharge amounts for the Surficial and Lower Tamiami aquifers and deeper aquifers such as the Sandstone and Hawthorne Aquifers, as described in the South Florida Water Management District's offieial pubheations dated April, 2000 seheduled -to be published in ''n Lower West Coast Water Supply Plan, as amended. Words underlined are added; words strasic threagh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words deae� are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 OBJECTIVE 2 (PROTECTION OF GROUNDWATER QUALITY): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 1] Ground water- qualit�, shall fne Protect groundwater from pollutant discharges that may cause exceedance of applicable Federal and State water quality standards. Policy 2.0.1 The County shall protect natural aquifer recharge areas to ensure the highest water quality practical toward meeting applicable Federal and State water quality standards for groundwater. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.2: [Revised text, page 2] Non - agricultural developments requiring an Environmental Resources Permit from the South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) shall preserve groundwater recharge characteristics as required by the SFWMD and as set forth in the SFWMD's Basis for- Review, dated -2AA4 Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual, Volume IV, 2009. Groundwater recharge shall also be protected through the application of the retention/detention requirements and allowable off -site discharge rates for non - agricultural developments specified in Policies 6.2 and 6.3 in the Drainage Stormwater Management Sub - Element. Policy 2.3: [Revised text, page 2] The County standards for protecting the quality of groundwater recharge within the wellhead protection areas identified in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) shall be those provided in Policy 3. 1.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 2.4: [Revised text, page 2] Collier County shall evaluate the necessity for adopting more stringent ground water groundwater recharge standards for High or Prime Recharge areas within 2 years of the SFWMD Governing Board's adoption of such areas. OBJECTIVE 3 (GROUNDWATER QUALITY MONITORING): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 2] The County shall eopAintie to e Collect and evaluate gfound watef groundwater quality data, identifying ambient water quality values and trends, comparing analyzed concentrations to Florida Ground Water Guidance Concentrations, and providing information to water resources planning and management entities, and to the general public. Policy 3.1: [Revised text, page 3] The County shall continue its existing water quality monitoring program to provide base -line data, evaluate long -term trends, identify water quality problems, and evaluate the effectiveness of the County's ground water- groundwater protection program. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dau-ble- stp ink t Fough are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element- CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Poliey [Unchanged text, page 2] The County will apAivally assess its greundwa4er- "ality meniter-ing data to detefmiae -A4 Gfoundwater- fneniter-ine eff-efts for- both qualitv and availabilit:y will inelude the gfeatef Golden Gate Estates-afea-. Policy 3.4: [Revised text, page 3] The County shall continually gather and evaluate appropriate relevant, appropriate and professionally accepted data for the purpose of refining and improving the groundwater quality monitoring database used in the County's 3- dimensional ground water- groundwater model. Policy 3.5: [Revised text, page 3] Collier County shall continue to conduct water resource planning with appropriate County, City of Naples, and South Florida Water Management District staff to provide for gfeund water groundwater resource development, utilization, and conservation. Water r-eseure° planni OBJECTIVE: 4 (PUBLIC EDUCATION WITH REGARD TO GROUNDWATER PROTECTION ISSUES): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 3] The County shat „trot e euFfent aetivities of p idin , Provide the public with educational materials concerning gr-eu a ,�•,a* °r groundwater protection issues in Collier County. These may materials include, but shall not be are not limited to, the preparation of annual technical publications of ground water groundwater quality data, an informational website for groundwater quality issues, general information publications, establishment of a speakers' bureau, K -12 classroom presentations, and in- service teacher workshops and seminars. Policy 4.1: [Revised text, page 3] The County shall continue to advise the public on the appropriate disposal methods for hazardous wastes, for the purpose of reducing or avoiding the potential for groundwater contamination. In performing this task, the County may utilize the public educational measures listed within Objective 4 of this Sub - Element, or any other measures which may be appropriate. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 5 (PROTECTION OF CAW-'4L RECHARGE AREAS AND GROUNDWATER RESOURCES): [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 3] The r,,upAy shall implem° „* Continue implementing plans to preserve e-ritieal gfound water- groundwater recharge areas and ,.,.,,,,,,a water groundwater resources, and ll along with reviewiqg, evaluatei_g, and reviseiqg (if warranted) those plans and actions, based on the best available geologic, hydrologic, hydrogeologic, and anthropogenic contaminant data. Policy 5.1: [Revised text, page 3] The County shall develop, and continually update, technical criteria for determining those recharge areas, which are critical to the County's long -term groundwater groundwater needs. Words underlined are added; words dough are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words g# are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 3 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 5.2: [Revised text, page 3] The County shall continue to identify er- itie-al recharge areas and appropriate protective mechanisms. Policy 5.3: [Revised text, page 3] The County shall continue to identify costs, funding mechanisms and private property rights issues associated with the protection of er-itieal recharge areas. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 5.5: [Revised text, page 4] Collier County shall continue to operate and maintain a hazardous waste collection facility. The facility shall operate five (5' days per wed will accept household and small business hazardous wastes. Additionally, the County shall continue to hold special events, such as its hazardous waste collection day, at least t T ie° per- ye targeting residential households lase and allowing small businesses to participate to insure consumer demand is met. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** page break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** MAP CHANGES: 1. Map 1, Groundwater Recharge to the Surficial Aquifer • This map is to be updated. 2. Map 2, Groundwater Recharge to the Lower Tamiami Aquifer • This map is to be updated. EAR -NGWAR Sub -E — CCPC Transmittal Hearing DRAFT updated to February 20, 2012 — 4:51 PM G: \CDES Planning Services \Comprehensive\2011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTS \CCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendments \CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda Materials \ELEMENTS for March 1 CCPC \EAR -based Amendments —CCPC Transmittal— NGWAR- 2.docx CS Words underlined are added; words stfusk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dn, -h'Q str,AaLffirnwah are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 EAR -based GMP amendments Housing Element — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 Goals, Objectives and Policies Housing Element GOAL 1: [Goal provided for contextual purposes only; no change proposed, page 3] TO CREATE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF DECENT, SAFE, SANITARY, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL RESIDENTS OF COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 1 [Revised text pending, page 3] [Shaded text: outstanding substantive issues remain - see Staff memo.] Policy 1.16: [Renumbered and revised text, page 3] Collier County shall pufsue maintain interlocal agreements with the City of Naples, the City of Marco Island, and Everglades City to that require that each city to provide their proportionate share of affordable �-wee housing units {or rp ovide the financial equivalent to the County ). Each city's proportionate share and financial equivalent will be evaluated and substantiated by the most current data, studies, and methods available to the County.) * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.2 7: [New Policy, page 3] The interlocal agreements referenced within Policy 1.1 shall be re- evaluated every three years. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.2-38: [Renumbered Policy, page 3] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1349• [Renumbered Policy, page 3] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stFUsk thmug# are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words d�� are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT EAR -based GMP amendments Housing Element— CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 Policy 1.4510: [Renumbered and revised text, page 3] Collie The County shall create or preserve affordable housing to minimize the need for additional local services and avoid the concentration of affordable housing units only in specific areas of the jurisdiction Where- adequate inf ast uet ffe and sefviees are a-vailabte. Programs and strategies to encourage affordable- •, ee housing development may include, but are not limited to, density by right within the Immokalee Urban area and other density bonus provisions, impact fee deferrals, expedited permitting (fast tracking), public - private partnerships, providing technical assistance and intergovernmental coordination. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.5611: [Renumbered Policy, page 3] OBJECTIVE 2: [Revised text pending, page 3] The Collief Gounty Board of County Cominissionefs aided in the estab! Housing Housing Development Cofpefation to sefve as a non pfofit ageney, with an executive boafd made up of fepresentatives from business-, goverriment, housing advocates, and the community at lafge, whieh along with other- For -profit and not - for-profit providers of affordable housing agencies shall assist Collie— the County and its municipalities in achieving a goal of increasing the number of affordable wor'kfofee housing units by at least fifteen percent of the units approved to be built in the County per year, but not less than 1,000 units per year averaged over a five -year period for very -low, low and moderate income residents of Collier County. [Shaded text: outstanding substantive issues remain — see Staff memo.] Policy 2.1: [Revised text, page 4] Not for profit agencies, shall assist the County in reaching its annual affordable ��^ -ice housing goal by holding workshops and fairs to raise awareness and understanding of housing issues in the County; working together to purchase and develop parcels; and, contributing funds towards the purchase of land for affordable A, &^ e housing projects. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words dom lble strueli t are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 2 EAR -based GMP amendments Housing Element — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 Policy 2.9: [Revised text, page 5] The County shall review the Counter its Affordable- workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance every two three years or sooner, as necessary, and revise the Ordinance, as necessary, to reflect changing community needs and market conditions. kThe purpose of the Affordable- workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance shall be to encourage the blending of affordable wv .,.�,- 4ciorce housing density bonus units into market rate developments as well as to support developments exclusively providing affordable wo j�e housing.) Policy 2.10: [Revised text, page 5] The Collier County Housing and Human Services Department shall continue to operate administer affordable - �=�eA ree housing programs, in cooperation with public and private sponsors, to provide safe, affordable •=�^ -use housing to residents of the County's urban designated areas and rural areas. Programs administered by the Department will continue to include, but are not limited to: • Impact fee deferrals • Housing rehabilitation and emergency repairs • Down payment and closing cost assistance • Acquisition (exclusive of Collier County Government) and rehabilitation program Policy 2.11: [Revised text, page 5] The Collier County Operations c rpoi4 and Housing D .t - in coordination with for - profit and not - for - profit providers of affordable housing development will shall continue to coordinate with local utility providers to ensure that the necessary infrastructure and facilities for new housing developments are in place, consistent with the County's Concurrency Management System. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 3: *** *** [Revised text, page 5] Collier County shall e Continue to su pport and ade q uatel y fund housin g programs to promote the preservation and protection of existing, stable residential neighborhoods. This will be accomplished through the utilization of State Housing Incentives Partnership (SHIP) and CDBG programs including, but not limited to, down payment/closing cost assistance, rehabilitation and emergency repair, demolition with new construction, and impact fee deferrals. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stRr- g are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words dilm cfr- -pic th are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT EAR -based GMP amendments Housing Element - CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 Policy 3.5: [Revised text, page 61 The City of Naples continues to implement incentive policies where practical, will initiate a swdy of he Old ,,T.,ple area to detefmine h'+ + 4 and development + a ds to protect and preserve historic structures, and maintain the existing residential character of the area. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 3.7: [Revised text, page 6] l implement +r, � easing continues to address the The City of Naples a conservation of housing stock and the preservation and protection of residential neighborhoods through its Neighborhood Action Plans. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 4: [Revised text, page 7] Gellief CowAy and the City of N —w4l EConduct housing surveys, every three years or sooner, for the purpose of identifying substandard dwelling units that fall below minimum housing standards. Through continued enforcement of County housing codes, and the provision of housing rehabilitation or replacement programs, the number of substandard units (associated with a lack of plumbing and /or kitchen facilities) throughout the County shall be reduced by 5% per year through rehabilitation or demolition. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 4.3: [Revised text, page 7] amend and the +: o r l ie, �� *The County shall with the City of Naples lan d th Gou*oj-, and create one a single uniform relocation housing policy, consistent with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development requirements. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 5: [Revised text, page 7] Collier- Gount�, and the City of Annually monitor all identified historically significant homes in order to promote the if theses —arc— ein conservationed, maintenanceained, and/or rehabilitationed of those structures. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words StFUsk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words d are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 4 EAR -based GMP amendments Housing Element — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 Policy 5.4: [Revised text, page 8] By 2019 209, Gollie the County shall with aftd the City of Naples wiI4 study potential incentives to encourage the conservation, maintenance and rehabilitation of historic homes and w44 make recommendations to the City Council and to the Board of County Commissioners as to which incentives should be adopted. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 5.6: [Revised text, page 8] By 20918, the Board of County Commissioners shall commission a new Historical Survey for all of unincorporated Collier County. The Survey shall review the current status of all previously identified historical structures and sites within the unincorporated County and shall make recommendations as to which of these sites or structures should be nominated to the National Register. The Survey shall also review and make similar recommendations regarding any previously unidentified historic structures or sites. Policy 5.7: [Revised text, page 8] By 20919, the Historical /Archaeological Preservation Ordinance shall be updated to include the results of the Historical Survey and to any relevant changes in State or Federal regulations concerning historical properties. OBJECTIVE 6: [Revised text, page 8] Collier- .fAy shall mMonitor changes to state and federal regulations pertaining to group housing and Continuing Care Retirement Centers f edit: and, as necessary, amend its the Land Development Code to ensure compliance. * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 7: * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** [Revised text, page 91 A-1thottgh mobile home developments eurfently exist within the eeastal areas of Collier County, as -a , Restrict new rezoningse to pefmit for mobile home development to areas outside of the will be allowed with a thee Coastal High Hazard Area, as depicted on the countywide Future Land Use Map, due to area's susceptibility to flooding and storm surge. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words StFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words do oble stwe.k thwuglh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT EAR -based GMP amendments Housing Element — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 --r OBJECTIVES: i ., .,,,.. jRey�se iextpedrn�g, �. [Shaded text: outstanding substantive issues remain - see Staff memo.] Policy 8.1: [Revised text, page 10] Collier The County shall continue to identi eenforming-eT sub- standard residences, of any type, within the Immokalee Urban Area and require that those residences to be eithe rehabilitated to current housing code standards or demolished. Poliey 8.2.! [Deleted text, page 10] ��. _ IMEN ,. Policy 8.23: [Revised text, page 10] Dur-ing 2004, the County completed a housing assessment sta:vey of single family, multi farnily_,-and mobile home units and mobile home pafks in the innnekalee Ufban Area, in ofder- to detefmine the nunibef of units that do not meet the County's our-r-ent health, saf�ty and minimum housing eodes, The County shall continue to target affordable . .,^ -�kf;qf housing and code enforcement programs to correct the ,., nditio deficiencies identified in the 2004 Immokalee Urban Area housing assessment survey. Policy 8.34: [Renumbered and revised text, page 10] Funding for rehabilitation of both owner and rental units within the innnekalee r r b and Rum! Lands Stewardship Afeas wi44 shall be provided through USDA funding, State SHIP finding, CDBG funding, or other appropriate funding sources, and leveraged with additional funding sources to the maximum degree possible. Policy 8.45: [Renumbered text, page 10] Words underlined are added; words struck thFough are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words dei 1ble stp id(th-Nigh. are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT EAR -based GMP amendments Housing Element- CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 Policy 8.56: [Revised text, page 11 ] Collier The County wi44 shall eantintie to utilize CDBG funds to provide farmworker- housing opportunities -, including in ad ition to h g e-„sin unit that tl J qualify for- uro + a c b special consideration of GDBG funds will be aimed at those units that current Yrvgrui , SHIP program guidelines prohibit from assistance (i.e., fnabile home ts) Fa......wer -ker -s will also eneoufaged, thfaugh the use of multi lingual eutf!eaeb pfegams, to take advantage of any ot GDBG, SHIP, heeal, State, Feder-a! and private pf!ogr-ams for- which they fnay qualify, * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 9: [New text, page 11 ] Support housing programs that encourage the development of energy efficient and environmentally sensitive houaiM Policy 9.1: [New text, page 11] The County shall encourage the construction of energy efficient housing by exploring innovative regulations that promote energy conserving and environmentally sensitive technologies and design Policy 9.2: [New text, page 11 ] The County shall educate the public about the economic and environmental benefits of resource efficient design and construction. Policy 9.3• [New text, page 11] The County shall expedite plan review of housing projects that promote energy conservation and design. Policy 9.4• [New text, page 11 ] The County shall continue to encourage the development of mixed housing types near employment centers in order to reduce Green House Gas emissions and minimize carbon footprints Policy 9.5• [New text, page 11] The County shall promote the incomoration of US EPA Energy Star Building and Appliances programs into construction and rehabilitation practices. EAR - Housing Element— CCPC Transmittal (Consent) Hearing 3/1/12 G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive12011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTMElementslHousing -MM Words underlined are added; words stFUslthreugh are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words de, ible stri ie�h are deleted -as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 7 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Recreation & Open Space Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goals, Objectives and Policies Recreation and Open Space Element (ROSE) GOAL 1: [No change to text, page 2] PROVIDE SUFFICIENT PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND OPEN SPACE AREAS TO MEET THE NEEDS OF RESIDENTS AND VISITORS OF COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 1.1: [No change to text, page 2] Continue to ensure that a comprehensive system of parks and recreation facilities is available from among facilities provided by the County, other governmental bodies and the private sector. Policy 1.1.1: [Revised text, page 2] Collier- County hefeby adopts the following level of sen4ee standafds for- faeilities and 1 v rr'i°a by the County o available to the general „,.blie. ivu v� ,.r•c. • .� �� Me. �i ATATA The standards for levels of service (LOS) of County parks and recreation facilities appear in Policy 1.5; subsection "G" in the Capital Improvement Element and shall be used as the basis for determining the availability of facilityapacity and the demand generated by a development * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy' •' •`. [Policy deleted, page2] order- to meet the 1°.. °1 of t .1 .1 �' a.a v. uv. w u.vv� ciicr Words underlined are added; words struck threes are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words ff# are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT .� * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy' •' •`. [Policy deleted, page2] order- to meet the 1°.. °1 of t .1 .1 �' a.a v. uv. w u.vv� ciicr Words underlined are added; words struck threes are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words ff# are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Recreation & Open Space Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 1.1.5 b: [Renumbered Policy, page 31 OBJECTIVE 1.2: [No change to text, page 3] Protect designated recreation sites and open space from incompatible land uses through development of appropriate design criteria and land use regulations. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 1.3• [No change to text, page 3] Continue to ensure that all public developed recreational facilities, open space and beaches and public water bodies are accessible to the general public. Policy 1.3.1: [Revised text, page 3] County -owned or managed parks and recreation facilities shall have automobile, bicycle and/or pedestrian access, where the location is appropriate and where such access is economically feasible with specific consideration liven to alternative forms of transportation that would reduce VMT and green house gas. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 1.4: [No change to text, page 3] Policy 1.4.1: [Revised text, page 3] Through the land development review process, Collier County shall continue to encourage developers to provide recreation sites and/or facilities within residential and mixed use Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), where appropriate. Policy 1.4.2• [Revised text, pages 3, 4] Collier County shall continue to coordinate the provision of recreational facilities and activities with other governmental jurisdictions that own or operate such facilities and activities within, or adjacent to, Collier County. r 1 •,,., xc i*Rd cv Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words d-e-A-le sie-,h are deleted —as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 ■_ Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words d-e-A-le sie-,h are deleted —as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Recreation & Open Space Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft MTN r. • OBJECTIVE 1.5: 3 -1 -12 [No text change, page 4] Through the PUD monitoring process, Collier County shall continue to enforce developer commitments for the provision of parks, recreation facilities and open space. Policy 1.5.1: [Revised text, page 4] Collier County shall maintain a current inventory of recreational facility and usable open space commitments made by developers through the development review process. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 1.6: [No text change, page 4] Whenever possible and practical, utilize County owned property for recreational uses. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** GOAL 2.2 [Deleted goal, page Objeetive '': [Deleted objective, page 4] By the year- 20 10, the Geu-pAy Parks and Reefeation Depaftfnent will identi6, general afeas whefe neighbor-hoods might e est sites f f,tufe neighbor-hood parks. • Policy '•'.' : [Deleted policy, page 4] The Par4cs and Reefeation Depaftment will idenfif�, these sites or- genefal areas fef neighbofhood vvulLL like to s ° within t,ei- „e ;.,L..Lods . Poliey 2.1-.-2-. [Relocated policy, page 5] The County shall amend the Land Development Gede to require the developer- of a residential P D, nT D having a residential eo nponent, to provide its residents d guests with or- park, basis, Atieh is, as fequir-ed by Pohey 5.4 in the Fulufe Land Use Element, eempatible with the suffounding developmen . Peliey 2.1.3: [Deleted policy, page 5] New neighber4ieod parks will be ear-efully sited and intentionally integfated into existing residential neighborhoods, and shall be designed aeeefding to the prineiples of Crime Pfeventio eeenefnieally feasible. Neighbwhoed parks may also be eo leeated i�A,ith ehufehes, schools, Of other- feereational f e l;t;e. Words underlined are added; words stFuGk theugtl are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dp-hip cip-eaah are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Recreation & Open Space Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Polley 2.1.4 [Deleted policy, page 5] who wish to dedieate land to the County to meet the r-eer-eational needs of neighbor-hood pafks. >D, hey 2.1. -S [Deleted policy, page 5] The County shall eneoufage the development of pedestfian pat",ays and bike lanes ffem the GOAL 3: [Renumbered & revised goal, page 5] • l.9�V - \ _ I_ • . • 4 d 1. . T\ D _ • . • • _ . • EWA- GOAL 3 2: THE COUNTY SHALL PROMOTE A PARK SYSTEM THAT INCLUDES REGIONAL, COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS WITH PEDESTRIAN PATHWAYS AND BIKE LANES TO PROVIDE USEABLE OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE RECREATIONAL NEEDS OF RESIDENTS WITHIN THE COMMUNITY. REGIONAL AND COMMUNITY PARK DEVELOPMENT WILL BE BASED ON THE LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARD (LOSS) CONTAINED IN THE CIE. OBJECTIVE 32.1: [Renumbered and revised text, page 5] By yeaf 2010 In 2011, the Parks and Recreation Department Wl- developed a Community and Regional Park Plan to provide larger parks and recreational facilities as well as passive open space within a 15 to 20 minute drive of residents within the coastal Urban Designated Area, the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, and Northern Golden Gate Estates (this excludes Conservation designated areas, Agricultural/Rural designated areas, Southern Golden Gate Estates, and the outlying Urban Designated Areas of Copeland, Port of the Islands, Plantation Island and Chokoloskee). This plan wiles includes the identification of future community and regional park sites (or general areas), park improvements, cost estimates, and potential funding sources. The principles of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) will be integrated into the planning and development of the Community and Regional Park sites. Policy 32.1.1: Policy 32.1.2: [Renumbered text, page 5] [Renumbered text, page 6] Policy 32.1.3: [Renumbered text, page 6] Policy 32.1.4: [Renumbered and revised text, page 6] The County shall continue to update parks and recreation impact fees to keep paee stn iner-eased appropriately reflect land acquisition and development costs for the establishment of community and regional parks. Words underlined are added; words s#usk-through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words doubles are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Recreation & Open Space Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 32.1.5: Policy 32.1.6: [Renumbered text, page 61 [Renumbered text, page 6] Policy 32.1.7: [Renumbered and revised text, page 6] By the year — 201-i The Parks and Recreation Department and the Transportation Services Division will continue to investigate the utilization of the existing canal and power line easements to create a greenway system within the coastal Urban Designated Area, the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, and Northern Golden Gate Estates (this exc-li Gensefvatien designated afeas, Agr-ieu1tuf!al4;WFa1 designated areas, SetAhefn Golden Ga Estates, and the autlying Ur-ban designated areas of Copeland, Peft of the islands, Plantation island and Chokeleskee), as detailed in the adopted Community and Regional Parks Master Plan. EAR -ROSE — CCPC Transmittal FINAL DRAFT updated to February 21, 2012 G:ICDES Planning ServiceslComprehensive120ll EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTSICCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendmentslCCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda MaterialslELEMENTS for March 1 CCPCIROSE Element -CCPC- Consent- 2- 17- 12.docx MB /CS Words underlined are added; words StFUGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words deubl� are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 5 EAR -based GMP Amendments Conservation and Coastal Management Element — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 Goals, Objectives and Policies Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME) GOAL 1: [Revised text, page 4] THE COUNTY SMALL CONTIN TO PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT AND APPROPRIATE USE OF "IS THE COUNTY'S NATURAL RESOURCES. OBJECTIVE 1.1: [Revised text, page 4] Gollie" County •_ 4 Continue to develop and implement, maintain a comprehensive environmental management and conservation program,, ., i44 to ensure that the natural resources, including State and Federally listed animal species; of within Ceder the County are properly, appropriately, and effectively identified, managed, and protected. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.1.6: [Revised text, page 4] In those areas of Collier the County where oil extraction and related processing is an allowable use, such use is shall be subject to applicable state and federal oil and gas permits and Collier the County's non - environmental site development plan review procedures. Directional - drilling and /or previously cleared or disturbed areas shall be utilized in order to minimize impacts to native habitats, where determined to be practicable. This requirement shall be deemed satisfied upon issuance of a state permit in compliance with the criteria established in Chapter 62C -25 through 62C -30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on as of January 13, 2005 the effective date of this amendment to the Collier County's Comprehensive Plan, and regardless of whether the activity occurs within the Big Cypress Watershed, as defined in Rule 62C - 30.001(2), F.A.C. All applicable Collier County environmental permitting requirements shall be considered satisfied by evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and /or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier the County, so long as the state permits comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C -25 through 62C -30, F.A.C. For those areas of Collier the County outside the boundary of the Big Cypress Watershed, the applicant shall be responsible for convening the Big Cypress Swamp Advisory Committee as set forth in Section 377.42, F.S., to assure compliance with Chapter 62C -25 through 62C -30, F.A.C. even if outside the defined Big Cypress Watershed. All access roads to oil and gas uses shall be constructed and protected from unauthorized uses according to the standards established in Rule 62C- 30.005(2)(a)(1) through (12), F.A.C. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stFusk t#feug# are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words dew are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT OBJECTIVE 1.2: [Revised text, page 5] Maintain the framework for an integrated, computer -based environmental resources data storage, analysis, and graphics system that is based on relevant, appropriate and professionally accented data and annually update the da4abases based an pr- s ana:1�4iea:4 data in efdef status of the CoupAy's natural Y-eseufees and pfopose potential pr-oteetion measuf!es when appfepfiate. Policy 1.2.1: [New text, page 5] The County shall annually update the environmental resources databases based on the previous year's analytical data in order to monitor the status of the County's natural resources and propose potential protection measures when appropriate. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break Policy 1.2.4 72: Policy 1.2.23: Policy 1.2.34: * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** [Renumbered text, page 5] [Renumbered text, page 5] [Renumbered text, page 5] Non -GIS -based data Ecollected & r eempiled data will shall be organized by established water -shed and sub -basin units. Policy 1.2.45: [Renumbered text, page 51 [Deleted text, page 5] OBJECTIVE 1.3: [Revised text, page 5] eampleted the phased delineation, data gathering, management guidelines and implementa4ion of the i-h-eil-iffir-al Lands Stewafdship Afea Over-lay in the Futtffe Land Use Element, the County has delineated Stewardship Sending A+eas that will funetion to p following h � the County shat ^— rotect identified environmental systems through the Natural Resource Protection Area �NRPA) and Rural Lands Stewardship programs. Words underlined are added; words GtFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words dle€lk thfek@h are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT Wtv.01 K4 NO OBJECTIVE 1.3: [Revised text, page 5] eampleted the phased delineation, data gathering, management guidelines and implementa4ion of the i-h-eil-iffir-al Lands Stewafdship Afea Over-lay in the Futtffe Land Use Element, the County has delineated Stewardship Sending A+eas that will funetion to p following h � the County shat ^— rotect identified environmental systems through the Natural Resource Protection Area �NRPA) and Rural Lands Stewardship programs. Words underlined are added; words GtFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words dle€lk thfek@h are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT Policy 1.3.1: [Revised text, page 6] The p,,. ose of The NRPA program i-s4e shall direct incompatible land uses away from significant environmental systems that exist at a landscape scale, contain large systems of connected wetland and upland habitats, and support a wide variety of listed species. The program will shall include the following: a. Identification of the NRPAs s in and mapping of NRPAs as an overlay to the Future Land Use Map; During the Assessment for the Rural Fringe area, the County has determined that CREW Trust lands, Belle Meade, a portion of the Northern Belle Meade shall be identified as NRPAs. The County also has determined that the South Golden Gate Estates is a NPRA. The specific boundaries have been identified as NRPAs on the Future Land Use Map.) b. A process for verifying the existence and boundaries of NRPAs during development permit applications; c. Guidelines and standards for development of NRPAs including conservation guidelines to protect natural resource values, to maintain ecologically functioning systems, and to restore or mitigate NRPAs already degraded. Allowable land uses, vegetation preservation standards, development standards, and listed species protection criteria for the NRPAs are those contained in the NRPA Overlay within the Future Land Use Element. d. A review process, integrated into the normal development application review, to ensure that the guidelines and standards are being met; e. A program to defer development of NRPAs. First consideration should be fee simple purchase (based on public referenda approving and funding purchases). Other options should include, but not be limited to, tax incentives and transfer of development rights; f. A program to pursue Delegation of Authority Agreements with State and Federal Permitting agencies for local regulation of activities that may alter the biological and physical characteristics of NRPAs; g. The County shall seek assistance from, and support, State (e.g. CARL, R) and /or Federal land acquisition programs for County areas qualifying as NRPAs. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** [Revised text, page 6] Policy 4-.-" 1.3.4: [Renumbered text, page 6] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** GOAL 2: [Revised text, page 4] T-14E COUNTY SHALL TO PROTECT WS THE COUNTY'S SURFACE AND ESTUARINE WATER RESOURCES. Words underlined are added; words StFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words d� are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT OBJECTIVE 2.1: [Revised text, page 7] By Januar-y 2008, the County shall eemplete the priefitization and begin the Prepareing Watershed Management Plans, which contain appropriate mechanisms to protect the County's estuarine and wetland systems. The proeess shall ist of "` an evaluation of areas r^" whie'' Water-shed Management Plans afe Hot neeessafy based on euffent of past water-shed manageme platming eff-et4s, (2) an assessment of available data and infoFmation that ean be used in th-e development of Water-shed Management Plans, and (3) budget authefization to begin pfepar-atien of the fifst Watefshed Mamagemei4 Plan by Januafy 2008. A funding sehedule shall be established to ensufe that all Water-shed Managemei# Plans will be eompleted by 2010. in seleeting the E)Fdef of PI eompletion, the CoufAy shall give pr-ier-ity to watefsheds whefe the development gr-eNk4h potential i gfeatest and will impaet the gf!eatest amount of wetland and listed speeies habitats. The sehedule an pfiefities shall also be eoefdinated with the Federal and State ageney plans that address Total Maximum Daily Leads (TN4DLs). Until the Watershed Management Plans are completed, the County shall apply the following as interim standards for development: a. All new development and re- development projects shall meet 150% of the water quality volumetric requirements of Section 5.2.1(a) of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water Management District (February 2006) and the retention and detention requirements, and the allowable offsite discharge rates required by Drainage Sub - element Policy 6.2 and 6.3, respectively; b. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland. C. Floodplain storage compensation shall be evaluated for developments within the designated Flood Hazard Area (flood zones starting with the letter "V" or "A ", "AE", and ""VE" as depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency with an effective date of November 17, 2005. Floodplain storage compensation shall also be evaluated for areas known to be periodically inundated by intense rainfall or sheetflow conditions. d. All development located within areas identified on Figure 1 shall be evaluated to determine impacts to natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs. For this particular evaluation, natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs shall be tentatively identified as contiguous lands having a continual preponderance of wetland or wet facultative plant species and a ground elevation through the major portion of the natural wetland, flowway, or slough at least one (1) foot lower than the ground at the edge of the natural wetland, flowway, or slough. The edge of the natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs shall be identified by field determination and based upon vegetation and elevation differences from the adjacent uplands or transitional wetlands. The County shall require the applicant to avoid direct impacts to these natural wetlands, flowways, or sloughs or, when not possible, to ensure any direct impact is minimized and compensated for by providing the same conveyance capacity lost by the direct impact. The County shall adhere to the limiting discharge rates of each basin as outlined in Ordinance 2001 -27, adopted May 22, 2001 which amended the County Water Management Policy and provided basin delineations where special peak discharge rates have been established. The limiting discharge rates will be reviewed as a part of the Watershed Management Plans, and modified according to the analyses and findings of the Watershed Management Plans. C. All new development and re- development projects shall ensure surrounding properties will not be adversely impacted from the project's influence on stormwater sheet flow. Words underlined are added; words StFUGk thFough are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words d-oubble s-W-1. Unw.l. are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 4 f. Prior to the issuance of a final development order, the County shall require all development projects to obtain the necessary state and federal environmental permits. g. Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations to require Best Management Practices of future development or re- development projects. Best Management Practices means structural and non - structural facilities or practices intended to reduce pollution either through source control or treatment of stormwater. Figure 1. Restoration Project Areas Where Interim Development Standard 2.l .d is Applicable [See Figure 1 following CCME text] * ** * ** * ** * * * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.1.7: [Revised text, page 9] Collie The County shall take the lead and promote intefgoveR rental coordination between the County and other governmental agencies involved with watershed planning, including, but not necessar-ily limited to, the municipalities of Marco Island, Naples and Everglades City, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and other governmental agencies. The County will take the shall continue to lead and oversee the preparation of the necessary watershed management plans, and will rely upon the work performed and /or data collected by other agencies, to the extent that these agencies have data and /or experience, which may be useful within the watershed basin planning and management process. OBJECTIVE 2.2: [Revised text, page 9] Require Aall canals, rivers, and flow ways discharging into estuaries shall to meet all applicable Federal, State, or local water quality standards. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.2.2: [Revised text, page 9] In order to limit the specific and cumulative impacts of stormwater run -off, stormwater systems shoul shall be designed in such a way that discharged water does not degrade receiving waters and an attempt is made to enhance the timing, quantity and quality of fresh water to the estuarine system. Non - structural methods such as discharge and storage into wetlands are encouraged. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.2.5: [Revised text, page 9] The County, in coordination with the South Florida Water Management District and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection shall develop and implement a plan to require By Deee be 31, 2008, and no less than , stormwater management systems shall be inspected and., Words underlined are added; words stFUsk thFough are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words dem oblgmdel( t are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 5 if feasible, certified by a licensed Florida professional engineer for compliance with their approved design, and any deficiencies shall be corrected. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 2.3: [Revised text, page 9] Develop and implement a plan in coordination with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, to ensure Aall estuaries shall meet all applicable federal, state and local water quality standards. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.3.4: [Revised text, page 10] The County shall Ccontinue to implement aria refine a it's water quality and sediment monitoring program for the estuarine system. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.3.6• [Revised text, page 10] The County will shall only allow development activities which will not adversely impact coastal water resources. This i-s shall be implemented through the following mechanisms: a. Require all applicable Federal and State permits addressing water quality to be submitted to Collie r the County before Collier Cou"'ty issues issuance of a Final Development Order. b. Excluding single family homes, any project impacting 5 acres or more of wetlands must shall provide a pre and post development water quality analysis to demonstrate no increase in nutrient', biochemieal exygen demand, total suspended solids, lead, zine and " ~ loading in the post development scenario. methodology, e. By januafy 2008, the County shall undertake an assessfnefA of the euffeat model used to minimum, the pu ese of this assessment will be to ver-ify the aeCeA--M--,T Of the m e d e 1 an d - . le data evaluating stonmwater- management straeture design. in reviewing the aeetimey 0 the model, the CeupAy will inelude an evaluafien of the r-eduetion of lake depths with time and the eeffespending loss of retention volume, the impaet of lake stfutifieation, and the need fe aeration. The assessment will also inelude the sampling of ftmoff ffofn undisturbed sites and pestieides. The results of the assessment and r-eeonunendations regarding the pollutafA loading > and fw4he monitor-ing shall be presented to the Board of County Goffunissioner-s for- ftu4her- difee * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words strusl thmugh are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words �— -1— q- - are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT OBJECTIVE 2.4: [Revised text, page 11] Collier County shall Eantinue- Takes a coordinated and cooperative approach with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regarding environmental planning, management and monitoring programs for Rookery Bay and Cape Romano - Ten Thousand Islands Aquatic Preserves and their watersheds. kAs part of this process, the County shall continue to notify FDEP of development projects within the watersheds of these preserve areas.) * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 2.5: [Revised text, page 11 ] The County will ^Continue with to implementer -ef4tis the estuarine management program by requiring development to meet its current standards addressing stormwater management, and the protection of seagrass beds, dune and strand, and wetland habitats. Policy 2.5.1: [Revised text, page 11 ] The County shall continue to lidentify land use activities that have the potential to degrade the estuarine environmental quality. Policy 2.5.2: [Revised text, page 11 ] Thei -s estuarine management program shall incorporate information obtained from the various watershed management plans described elsewhere in this Element. Policy 2.5.3: [Revised text, page 11 ] Thei -s estuarine mana eg ment program shall, in part, continue to be based on the estuarine data analyses and management recommendations contained in the County's coastal management program's technical reports. GOAL 3: [Revised text, page 12] THE COUNTY SHALL TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S GROUND WATER RESOURCES TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST WATER QUALITY PRACTICAL OBJECTIVE 3.1: [Revised text, page 12] G,.,.un ., atef quality sh Meet all applicable Federal and State round water quality standards. and vivuuu vv ucc� Gfound— w-atef Eluality shall:�e monitored in oiler ground water quality to determine whether development activities are contributing to the its degradation of Collief County's Gr-otind watef data and land use aetivities. v.4111. be assessed annually to determine long term t-r-ends an whether- the County is fneeting Fedefal and State regulatory standards fof ground watef quality. County shall fequire gfound water- monitofing of land uses in aeeofdanee with Chaptefs 62 520-,-62- 550 and 62 777 of the Fler-ida Administrative Code. Upon the deteetion of any gfound watef r eguiu lat o Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words ffh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 7 Policy 3.1.1: [New text, page 12] Ground water data and land use activities shall be assessed annually to determine long -term trends and whether the County is meeting Federal and State regulatory standards for ground water quality. Policy 3.1.2: [New text, page 13] The County shall require ground water monitoring of land uses in accordance with Chapters 62 -520, 62 -550 and 62 -777 of the Florida Administrative Code. Upon the detection of any ground water degradation determined through the monitoring_ process the County shall notify the appropriate regulatory agencies. Policy 3.1.3: [New text, page 13] The County shall maintain its groundwater monitoring network by coordinating with various state agencies and private land owners to create a comprehensive inventory of monitoring wells, an assessment of monitoring wells previously damaged and provide for appropriate well repairs and replacements. Policy 3.1.14: [Renumbered and Revised text, page 12] Wellhead protection areas identified on the Future Land Use Map Series shall be protected as follows: 1. Wellhead protection areas shall consist of four (4) Wellfield Risk Management Zones defined as follows: a) W -1 is the land area surrounding the identified potable water wellfield wellheads and extends to the five percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the one year ground water travel time to the wellfield). b) W -2 is the land area between the W -1 boundary zone boundary line (which approximates the two water wellfield). c) W -3 is the land area between the W -2 boundary capture zone boundary line (which approximates line and the ten percent ground water capture year ground water travel time to the potable line and the twenty -five percent ground water the five year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). d) W -4 is the land area between the W -3 boundary line and the 100 percent ground water capture zone boundary line (which approximates the twenty year ground water travel time to the potable water wellfield). 2. Land uses are restricted within the wellfield risk management zones as follows: a) Future solid waste disposal facilities: prohibited in all wellfield risk management zones. b) Future solid waste transfer stations: prohibited in W -1, W -2, W -3. c) Future solid waste storage, collection, and recycling storing hazardous products and hazardous wastes: prohibited in W -1, W -2, W -3. Words underlined are added; words ask thFough are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words ddeaubblo_ wic thra, -nh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT d) Future non - residential uses involving hazardous products in quantities exceeding 250 liquid gallons or 1,000 pounds of solids: provide for absorption or secondary containment in W -1, W -2, W -3. e) Future domestic wastewater treatment plants: prohibited in W- 1. f) Future land disposal systems: must meet high level disinfection standards as found in 40 CFR part 135. g) Land application of domestic residuals: limit metal concentrations, nitrogen based on uptake ability of vegetation), and require a conditional use. h) Future petroleum exploration and production and expansions of existing: prohibited in W -1 and W -2, conditional use required in W -3 and W -4. i) Future on -site disposal systems (septic tanks) requiring a soil absorption area greater than 1,000 square feet are allowed to discharge in zone W -1 subject to complying with construction standards and provision of an automatic dosing device and a low- pressure lateral distribution. j) On -site sewage disposal systems (septic tanks) serving existing industrial uses and subject to the thresholds in d) and e) above within wellfield zones W -1, W -2, and W -3 shall meet all construction and operating standards contained in 64E -10, F.A.C. as the rule existed on August 31, 1999 and shall implement a ground water monitoring plan. 3. Conditional uses referenced within this policy shall be granted only in ° tfaerai^ <' ;tanees and whenre development impacts of the deve'opme „+ will be isolated from the Surficial and Intermediate Aquifer. Policy 3.1.5 [New text, page 13] The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District and the Big Cypress Basin in the development and implementation of a salt water intrusion monitoring program. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 3.2 [Revised text, page 13] The County shall ;<,-,,,le nt u Continue the well construction compliance program under based upon criteria specified in the Collier County Well Construction Ordinance, whieh is d° to ensure proper well construction of wells and promote aquifer protection. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 3.3: [No change to text, page 13] Continue to identify, refine extents of, and map zones of influence and contribution around potable wellfields in order to identify activities that must be regulated to protect ground water quality near wellfields. (Refer to Objective 1.1 in the Natural Ground Water Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element.) * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stfusk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 9 OBJECTIVE 3.4 [Revised text, page 14] Collect and evaluate data and information designed to monitor the quality of ground water in order to identify the need for additional protection measures. (Refer to Objective 4-.3 in the Natural Ground `Oftw Water Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element.) Policy 3.4.1: [Revised text, page 14] Continue tThe existing water quality monitoring program shall continue to provide base -line data, evaluate long -term trends - including g alinity trending, identify water quality problems, and evaluate the effectiveness of the County's ground water protection program. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 3.4.4: [Revised text, page 14] The County, in coordination with the South Florida Water Management District and the Big Cypress Basin, shall Ggather and use appropriate data to refine and improve the database used in the County's 3- dimensional ground water model. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** GOAL 4: [Revised text, page 15] THE COUNTV SHALL TO CONSERVE, PROTECT AND APPROPRIATELY MANAGE THE COUNTY'S FRESH WATER RESOURCES. OBJECTIVE 4.1: [Revised text, page 15] Collect and evaluate data and information designed to more accurately determine water use in the Collie County sueh as the County's consumptive use pefmits. Policy 4.1.1 [New text, page 15] The County shall track all permitted wells and wells having consumptive use permits. Policy 4.1.12: [Renumbered text, page 15] Policy 4.1.2-3: [Renumbered and Revised text, page 15] The County, in coordination with the South Florida Water Management District shall Wwork with the agricultural community to devise a method for determining agricultural pumpage. Policy 4.1.34: [Renumbered text, page 15] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words StFUGk thFeo0# are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words do wic thmoq are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 10 GOAL 5: [Revised text, page 16] THE COUNTY SHALL T T TO PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE IBS THE COUNTY'S MINERAL AND SOIL RESOURCES. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** textbreak * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 5.3: [Revised text, page 16] Periodically assess the types, quantities and location of minable mineral resources within Collie the County. Policy 5.3.1: [Revised text, page 16] The Celle County's Engineering Review Services went Section shall work with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Geological Survey and local mining industry officials to inventory and assess the existing mineral reserves in Collier County. The inventory and assessment wi44 shall incorporate use of a GIS -based database of all areas within the County that are permitted, either by right, or through a conditional use permit, to conduct mineral extraction operations as well as the volume of fill that is permitted to be removed for each such active mineral extraction operation. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** GOAL 6: [Revised text, page 18] THE COUNTY S14AT TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE ITS NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. OBJECTIVE 6.1: [Revised text, page 18] The Caunty sh4 ^Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. The following .,olieies provide efiteri to make this objeetive mo fambl kThese policies under this Objective shall apply to all of Collier County except for that portion of the County which is identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) as the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay.) Polccy [Reyiised text, page, 18]' Words underlined are added; words s#ruGk thr,96igh are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words �eli thFough are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT ldent�al and NTixeci Equal to or greater Use %Development than 2.5 acres 25% =�Mef` � 20 a ..� 25% commercial, and SEE Les lli °fl ..H Indu�.at �E j �oopnent tc E an 5 acres greater t Wh industrial Development tRural 5� °0, not' toxceed.._25 °% © of the S4° €fit emceed 25�o cifthe Industnal i strict only) e et site. [Shaded text: outstanding substantive issues remain - see Staff memo.] The following standards and criteria shall apply to the vegetation retention requirements referenced above. (1) For the purpose of this policy, "native vegetation" is defined as a vegetative community having 25% or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native plant species. The vegetation retention requirements specified in this policy are calculated based on the amount of "native vegetation" that conforms to this definition. (2) The preservation of native vegetation shall include canopy, under -story and ground cover emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible, which may include connection to offsite preserves. The purpose for identifying the largest contiguous area is to provide for a core area that has the greatest potential for wildlife habitat by reducing the interface between the preserve area and development which decreases the conflicts from other land uses. Criteria for determining the dimensional standards of the preserve are to be set out in the Land Development Code. (3) Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this policy shall be set aside as preserve areas. On -site and off -site preserve areas shall be protected by a permanent Words underlined are added; words stFUsk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 12 conservation mechanism to prohibit further development, consistent with the requirements of this policy. The type of permanent conservation mechanism, including conservation easements, required for a specific development may vary based on preserve area size, type of development approval, and other factors, as set forth in the County's land development regulations. (4) Selection of native vegetation to be retained as preserve areas shall reflect the following criteria in descending order of priority: a. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as corridors for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and protected in order to facilitate the continued use of the site by listed species or the movement through the site, consistent with the requirements of Policy 7. 1.1 and 7.1.2 of this element. b. Xeric Scrub, Dune and Strand, Hardwood Hammocks. c. Onsite wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM, unless permitted for impact pursuant to Policy 6.2.4 of this Element. WRAP means South Florida Water Management District's Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedures as described in Technical Publication Reg 001 (September 1997, as updated August 1999). UMAM means Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method as described in Chapter 62 -345, F.A.C. d. Any upland habitat that serves as a buffer to a wetland area as identified in Paragraph (4)c. above, e. Dry Prairie, Pine Flatwoods, and f. All other native habitats. (5) The uses allowable within preserve areas are limited to: a. Passive recreational uses that do not impact the minimum required vegetation or cause a loss of function to the preserve area. Loss of function to the preserve area includes a reduction or a change in vegetation within the preserve and harming any listed species present in the preserve. More specific standards that implement this policy shall be set forth in the land development regulations and will address various types of construction that are compatible with the function of the preserve. The land development regulations will also provide criteria to define appropriate passive recreational uses. The criteria will be established to allow for passive recreational uses such as trails or boardwalks that provide for access within the preserves, providing the uses do not reduce the minimum required vegetation or cause harm to listed species. b. Receipt of treated stormwater discharge where such use, including conveyance, treatment and discharge structures, does not result in adverse impacts the naturally occurring, native vegetation, to include the loss of the minimum required vegetation acreage and the harm to any listed species according to the policies associated with Objective 7.1, as determined by criteria set forth in land development regulations. Discharge to preserves having wetlands requires treatment that will meet water quality standards as set forth in Chapter 62 -302. F.A.C. and will conform to the water quality criteria requirements set forth by the South Florida Water Management District. (6) A management plan shall be submitted for preserve areas identified by specific criteria in the land development regulations to identify actions that must be taken to ensure that the preserved areas will maintain natural diversity and will function as proposed. The plan shall include methods to address control and treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management, stormwater management (if applicable), and maintenance of permitted facilities. If applicable, a listed species monitoring program shall be submitted pursuant to Policy 7.1.2 (2) (i). State and federal management plans consistent with the requirements of the LDC will be accepted. Words underlined are added; words struuelcheugh are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 13 , exee _t 1, 't' t' the `' ' 1 -- -t shall t, granted for- par-eels that eannet reasenab! late both the pr-eser-vatien afea and , r 1 pr-epesed t' 't y (` 't n f nlle „o g these exeeptiens inel 70 tL. bilit J L. f t native vegetation in its existing lee , existing naive 7 (e) Whefe native pfeser-vation fequir-ements are not 7 the landseape plan sha:4 (7) All State and Federal parks, preserves and forests are subject to compliance with the minimum native vegetation retention requirements however such lands are not required to be designated as preserves encumbered with conservation easements or subject to the establishment of preserve management plans. (8) Parcels that were legally cleared of native vegetation prior to January 1989 shall be exempt from this requirement. (9) Should the amount of wetland vegetation exceed the minimum vegetation requirements as specified herein, retention of wetland vegetation having significant habitat or hydrologic value is encouraged. Increased preservation shall be fostered through incentives including, but not limited to: clustered development, reduced development standards such as open space, setbacks, and landscape buffers, to allow for increased areas of preserved wetland vegetation. Significant habitat or hydrologic value is determined by wetland function, not the size of the wetland. p}� e ff eti< e date of these amendments-, tThe County shall adopt land (10)Within Vll Lllt JL development regulations that allow for a process whereby a property owner may submit a petition requesting that all or a portion of the native vegetation preservation retention requirement to be satisfied by a monetary payment, land donation that contains native vegetative communities equal to or of a higher priority as described in Policy 6.1.1 (4) than the land being impacted, or other appropriate method of compensation to an acceptable land acquisition program, as required by the land development regulations. The monetary payment shall be used to purchase and manage native vegetative communities off -site. The land development regulations shall provide criteria to determine when this alternative will be considered. The criteria will be based upon the following provisions: a. The amount, type, rarity and quality of the native vegetation on site; b. The presence of conservation lands adjoining the site; c. The presence of listed species and consideration of Federal and State agency technical assistance; d. The type of land use proposed, such as, but not limited to, affordable housing; e. The size of the preserve required to remain on site is too small to ensure that the preserve can remain functional; and f. Right of Way acquisitions for all purposes necessary for roadway construction, including ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities within the right of way acquisition area. The land development regulations shall include a methodology to establish the monetary value, land donation, or other appropriate method of compensation to ensure that native vegetative communities not preserved on -site will be preserved and appropriately managed off -site. Words underlined are added; words strUskthrough are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 14 (11) Right of Way acquisitions by any governmental entity for all purposes necessary for roadway construction, including ancillary drainage facilities, and including utilities within the right of way acquisition area, shall be exempt from mitigation requirements. (12) Although the primary intent of this Policy is to retain and protect existing native vegetation, there are situations where the application of the retention requirements of this Policy is not possible. In these cases, creation or restoration of vegetation to satisfy all or a portion of the native vegetation retention requirements may be allowed. Within one year of the effective date of these amendments, the County shall adopt land development regulations to determine the circumstances for when creation or restoration is allowed and to specify criteria for creation and restoration. (13) The County may grant a deviation to the native vegetation retention requirements of subsections 2, 4, 5, 10 and 12 of this Policy, and emeept€er- the Native Vegetation Retention Requirements Table, and pr-evisions in Paragraphs -1, -2, 3, 6 and 7. Within oflo of the eft eti .'e date V ^f these amendments, the G + shall adopt land development regulations to set forth the process for obtaining a deviation. The regulations shall allow for the granting of a deviation by the appropriate review board after a public hearing, and for the granting of a deviation administratively. The County shall consider the amount and type of native vegetation and the presence of listed species in determining whether the granting of a deviation requires a public hearing, or may be granted administratively. The County may grant a deviation if: a. County, Federal or State agencies require that site improvements be located in areas which result in an inability to meet the provisions of this Policy, or b. On or off -site environmental conditions are such that the application of one or more provisions of this Policy is not possible or will result in a preserve area of lesser quality, or c. The strict adherence to these provisions will not allow for the implementation of other Plan policies that encourage beneficial land uses. (14) Industrial zoned parcels which pursuant to the table within this Policy, would have a native vegetation retention requirement of 2 acres or less shall be exempt from this requirement This exemption shall not apply to the overall native vegetation retention requirement for a PUD or subdivision used to create these parcels unless the overall native vegetation retention requirement for the PUD or subdivision is 2 acres or less Policy 6.1.2: [Revised text, page 21 ] For the County's Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, as designated on the FLUM, native vegetation shall be preserved on site through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria Additionally, for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System located within the Immokalee Urban Designated Area native vegetation shall be preserved on site through the application of the Neutral Lands standards in "b" below, on an interim basifs Muntil such time as a study is completed to determine if different standards are appropriate for this area Preservation and Native Vegetation Retention Standards: a. Receiving Lands: A minimum of 40% of the native vegetation shall be preserved. present, not to exceed 25% of the total site area Words underlined are added; words strusk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words d -ugh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 15 b. Neutral Lands: A minimum of 60% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 45% of the total site area shall be preserved, except as provided in the North Belle Meade Overlay in the Future Land Use Element for Section 24, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. c. Non -NRPA Sending Lands: Calculated at the higher value of 80% of the native vegetation present, or as may otherwise be permitted under the Density Rating provisions of the FLUE; d. NRPA Sending Lands: Calculated at the higher value of 90% of the native vegetation present, or as may otherwise be permitted under the Density Blending provisions of the FLUE. e. Provisions a. through d. above shall also be consistent with the wetland protection policies set forth under CCME Objective 6.2. f. In order to ensure reasonable use and to protect the private property rights of owners of smaller parcels of land within lands designated Rural Fringe Mixed Use District on the Future Land Use Map, including nonconforming lots of record which existed on or before June 22, 1999, for lots, parcels or fractional units of land or water equal to or less than five (5) acres in size, native vegetation clearing shall be allowed, at 20% or 25,000 square feet of the lot or parcel or fractional unit, whichever is greater, exclusive of any clearing necessary to provide for a 15- foot wide access drive up to 660 feet in length. For lots and parcels greater than 5 acres but less than 10 acres, up to 20% of the parcel may be cleared. This allowance shall not be considered a maximum clearing allowance where other provisions of this Plan allow for greater clearing amounts. These clearing limitations shall not prohibit the clearing of brush or under - story vegetation within 200 feet of structures in order to minimize wildfire fuel sources. g. Within Receiving and Neutral lands where schools and other public facilities are co- located on a site, the native vegetation retention requirement shall be 30% of the native vegetation present, not to exceed 25% of the site. (1) For the purpose of this policy, "native vegetation" is defined as a vegetative community having 25% or more canopy coverage or highest existing vegetative strata of native plant species. The vegetation retention requirements specified in this policy are calculated on the amount of "native vegetation" that conforms to this definition. (2) The preservation of native vegetation shall include canopy, under -story and ground cover, emphasizing the largest contiguous area possible, which may include connection to offsite preserves. The purpose for identifying the largest contiguous area is to provide for a core area that has the greatest potential for wildlife habitat by reducing the interface between the preserve area and development which decreases the conflicts from other land uses. Criteria for determining the dimensional standards of the preserve are to be set out in the Land Development Code. (3) Areas that fulfill the native vegetation retention standards and criteria of this policy shall be set aside as preserve areas. On -site and off -site preserve areas shall be protected by a permanent conservation mechanism to prohibit further development, consistent with the requirements of this policy. The type of conservation mechanism, including conservation easements, required for a specific development may vary based on preserve area size, type of development approval, and other factors, as set forth in the County's land development regulations. (4) Selection of native vegetation to be retained as preserve areas shall reflect the following criteria in descending order of priority: a. Wetland or upland areas known to be utilized by listed species or that serve as corridors for the movement of wildlife shall be preserved and protected in order to facilitate the continued use of the site by listed species or the movement of wildlife through the site. This criterion shall be consistent with the requirements of Policy 7. 1.1 and 7.1.2 of this element. Words underlined are added; words dough are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words d--- No strueoangh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 16 b. Xeric Scrub, Dune and Strand, Hardwood Hammocks. c. Onsite wetlands preserved pursuant to Policy 6.2.5 of this Element; d. Any upland habitat that serves as a buffer to a wetland area, as identified in (4)c. above. e. Dry Prairie, Pine Flatwoods, and f. All other native habitats. (5) The uses allowable within preserve areas are limited to: a. Passive recreational uses that do not impact the minimum required vegetation or cause a loss of function to the preserve area. Criteria identifying what constitutes a loss of function shall be set forth in the land development regulations and will address various types of construction that are compatible with the function of the preserve. The land development regulations will also provide criteria to define appropriate passive recreational uses. The criteria will be established to allow for passive recreational uses such as trails or boardwalks that provide for access within the preserves, providing the uses do not reduce the minimum required vegetation or cause harm to listed species. b. Receipt of treated stormwater discharge where such use, including conveyance, treatment and discharge structures, does not result in adverse impacts on the naturally occurring, native vegetation, to include the loss of the minimum required vegetation and the harm to any listed species according to the policies associated with Objective 7. 1, as determined by criteria set forth in the land development regulations. Discharge to preserves having wetlands requires treatment that will meet water quality standards as set forth in Chapter, 62 -302 F.A.C. and will conform to the water quality criteria requirements set forth by the South Florida Water Management District. (6) A management plan shall be submitted for all preserve areas identified by specific criteria in the land development regulations to identify actions that must be taken to ensure that the preserved areas will function as proposed. The plan shall include methods to address control and treatment of invasive exotic species, fire management, stormwater management (if applicable), and maintenance of permitted facilities. If applicable, a listed species monitoring program shall be submitted pursuant to Policy 7.1.2 (2)(i). (7) Off -site preservation shall be allowed to provide flexibility in the project design. a. Within Receiving and Neutral Lands, off -site preservation shall be allowed for up to 50% of the vegetation retention requirement. 1. Off -site preservation areas shall be allowed at a ratio of 1:1 if such off-site preservation is located within designated Sending Lands or at a ratio of 1.5:1 anywhere else. 2. Like for like preservation shall be required for Tropical Hardwood and Oak Hammock vegetative communities. b. Within non -NRPA Sending Lands, off -site preservation shall be allowed for up to 25% of the site preservation or vegetative retention requirement, whichever is controlling. 1. Off -site preservation areas shall be contiguous to designated Sending Lands and shall be allowed at a ratio of 3:1. c. Off -site preservation shall not be allowed in NRPA Sending Lands. (8) Density Bonus Incentives shall be granted to encourage preservation amounts greater than that required in this policy, as provided for in the FLUE for Receiving Lands and Rural Villages. Within one (1) year of the effective date of these amendments, Collier County shall adopt specific land development regulations to implement this incentive program. (9) On -site preservation areas shall also conform to the Open Space requirements as specified in the Future Land Use Element. These preservations shall be part of and counted towards the Open Space requirements. Words underlined are added; words strusk-thmug# are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words deablei thFough are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 17 (10) Existing native vegetation that is located contiguous to the natural reservation shall be preserved pursuant to Policy 6.5.2 of this element. Natural reservation is defined as that specified in CCME Objective 6.5 of this element; (11) Should the amount of wetland vegetation exceed the minimum vegetation requirements as specified herein, retention of wetland vegetation having significant habitat or hydrologic value is encouraged. Increased preservation shall be fostered through incentives including, but not limited to: clustered development, reduced development standards such as open space, setbacks, and landscape buffers, to allow for increased areas of preserved wetland vegetation. Significant habitat or hydrologic value is determined by wetland function, not the size of the wetland. (12) All State and Federal parks preserves and forests are subject to compliance with the minimum native vegetation retention requirements; however, such lands are not required to be designated as preserves encumbered with conservation easements or subject to the establishment of preserve management plans. (13) Industrial zoned parcels which pursuant to the table within Policy 6.1.1, would have a native vegetation retention requirement of 2 acres or less shall be exempt from this requirement. This exemption shall not apply to the overall native vegetation retention requirement for a PUD or subdivision used to create these parcels unless the overall native vegetation retention requirement for the PUD or subdivision is 2 acres or less. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 6.1.6: [Revised text, page 24] Exemptions from the native vegetation retenti - ' The minimum native vegetation retention requirements of Policy 6.1.2 shall not apply to, affect or limit the continuation of existing uses. Existing use shall be defined as: those uses for which all required permits were issued prior to June 19, 2002; or, projects for which a Conditional Use or— Rezone petitio was approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, or, projects for which a Rezone petition has been approved by the County prior to June 19 2002 - inclusive of all lands not zoned A, Rural Agricultural; or, land use petitions for which a completed application was submitted prior to June 19, 2002. The continuation of existing uses shall include on -site expansions of those uses if such expansions are consistent with, or clearly ancillary to, the existing uses. Hereafter, such previously approved developments shall be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Policies and Objectives for the Rural Fringe area, and they may be built out in accordance with their previously approved plans. Changes to these previous approvals shall also be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Objectives and Policies for the Rural Fringe Area as long as they do not result in an increase in development density or intensity. On the County owned land located in Section 25, Township 26 E, Range 49 S ( +/ -360 acres), the native vegetation retention and site preservation requirements may be reduced to 50% if the permitted uses are restricted to the portions of the property that are contiguous to the existing land fill operations; exotic removal will be required on the entire +/- 360 acres. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words E;tFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words de�� are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 18 OBJECTIVE 6.2: [Revised text, page 25] The Ceu 4y s h ^'Protect and conserve wetlands and the natural functions of wetlands pursuant to the appropriate policies under Goal 6. The following pohe-ies provide er-it�-ia to make this bj ti meastir-able. (The County's wetland protection policies and strategies shall be coordinated with the Watershed Management Plans as required by Objective 2.1 of this Element.) Policy 6.2.1 [Revised text, page 25] As requifed by Florida Admiiiistr-afive Code W5 , wWetlands identified by the 1994 95 the current SFWMD land use and land cover inventory are mapped on the Future Land Use Map series. For a proposed project identified on this map series These :.ea„ Tall be vefified by a jurisdietie � field delineation, subjeet to Pehey 6.2.2 of this element, a4 the tifne of pr-ojeet pefmitting to detefmine the exact location of jurisdictional wetland boundaries shall be verified by a jurisdictional field delineation, subject to Policy 6.2.2 of this Element at the time of Environmental Resource Permitting. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 6.2.5: [Revised text, page 29] Within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and that portion of the Lake Trafford /Camp Keais Strand System which is contained within the Immokalee Urban Designated Area, Collier County shall direct land uses away from higher functioning wetlands by limiting direct impacts within wetlands based upon the vegetation requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element, the wetland functionality assessment described in paragraph (2) below, and the final permitting requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. A direct impact is hereby defined as the dredging or filling of a wetland or adversely changing the hydroperiod of a wetland. This policy shall be implemented as follows: (1) The County shall apply the vegetation retention requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. and Policy 6.1.2.b. of this element for the Lake Trafford/Camp Keais Strand System. in order to preserve an appropriate amount of native vegetation on site. Wetlands shall be preserved as part of this vegetation requirement according to the following criteria: a. The acreage requirements of Policy 6.1.2 of this element shall be met by preserving wetlands with the highest wetland functionality scores. Wetland functionality assessment scores shall be those described in paragraph (2) of this policy. Wetlands having a WRAP score of at least 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of 0.7 shall be preserved on site. This policy is not intended in all cases to require preservation of wetlands exceeding the acreage required by Policy 6.1.2 of this element. Within one year, the County shall develop specific criteria to be used to determine when wetlands having a WRAP score greater than 0.65 or a Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method score of greater than 0.7 shall be required to be retained exceeding the acreage required by Policy 6.1.2 of this element. (2) In order to assess the values and functions of wetlands at the time of project review, applicants shall rate functionality of wetlands using the South Florida Water Management District's Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP), as described in Technical Publication Reg - 001, dated September 1997, and updated August 1999, or the Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method, F.A.C. Chapter 62 -345. The applicant shall submit to County staff, agency accepted WRAP scores or Uniform Wetland Mitigation Assessment Method scores. Words underlined are added; words Dough are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words douhl are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 19 County staff shall review this functionality assessment as part of the County's EIS provisions and shall use the results to direct incompatible land uses away from the highest functioning wetlands according to the requirements found in paragraph (1) above. (3) All direct impacts shall be mitigated for pursuant to the requirements of paragraph (6) of this policy. (4) Single family residences shall follow the requirements contained within Policy 6.2.7 of this element. (5) The County shall separate preserved wetlands from other land uses with appropriate buffering requirements. The County shall require a minimum 50 -foot vegetated upland buffer adjacent to a natural water body, and for other wetlands a minimum 25 -foot vegetated upland buffer adjacent to the wetland. A structural buffer may be used in conjunction with a vegetative buffer that would reduce the vegetative buffer width by 50 %. A structural buffer shall be required adjacent to wetlands where direct impacts are allowed. Wetland buffers shall conform to the following standards: a. The buffer shall be measured landward from the approved jurisdictional line. b. The buffer zone shall consist of preserved native vegetation. Where native vegetation does not exist, native vegetation compatible with the existing soils and expected hydrologic conditions shall be planted. c. The buffer shall be maintained free of Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. d. The following land uses are considered to be compatible with wetland functions and are allowed within the buffer: 1. Passive recreational areas, boardwalks and recreational shelters; 2. Pervious nature trails; 3. Water management structures; 4. Mitigation areas; 5. Any other conservation and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses. e. A structural buffer may consist of a stem -wall, berm, or vegetative hedge with suitable fencing. (6) Mitigation shall be required for direct impacts to wetlands in order to result in no net loss of wetland functions. a. Mitigation Requirements: 1. "No net loss of wetland functions" shall mean that the wetland functional score of the proposed mitigation equals or exceeds the wetland functional score of the impacted wetlands. However, in no case shall the acreage proposed for mitigation be less than the acreage being impacted. 2. Loss of storage or conveyance volume resulting from direct impacts to wetlands shall be compensated for by providing an equal amount of storage or conveyance capacity on site and within or adjacent to the impacted wetland. 3. Protection shall be provided for preserved or created wetland or upland vegetative communities offered as mitigation by placing a conservation easement over the land in perpetuity, providing for initial exotic plant removal (Class I invasive exotic plants defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council) and continuing exotic plant maintenance. 4. Prior to issuance of any final development order that authorizes site alteration, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with paragraphs (6)a.1, (6)a.2, and (6)a.3 of this policy. If agency permits have not provided mitigation consistent with this policy, Words underlined are added; words stFUGk thmugh are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 20 Collier County will require mitigation exceeding that of the jurisdictional agencies. 5. Mitigation requirements for single - family lots shall be determined by the State and Federal agencies during their permitting process, pursuant to the requirements of Policy 6.2.7 of this element. b. Mitigation Incentives: 1. Collier County shall encourage certain types of mitigation by providing a variety of incentives in the form of density bonuses and credits to open space and vegetation retention requirements. Density bonuses shall be limited to no more than 10% of the allowed density. 2. Preferred mitigation activities that would qualify for these incentives include, but are not limited, to the following: (a) Adding wetland habitat to or restoring wetland functions within Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands, (b) Creating, enhancing or restoring wading bird habitat to be located near wood stork, and /or other wading bird colonies. 3. Within one (1) year of the effeetive da4e of these amendments, Collief County shall other- mitigation •t * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** GOAL 7: * ** * ** [Revised text, page 35] THE COUNTY SHAI TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE IT-IS THE COUNTY'S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. OBJECTIVE 7.1: [Revised text, page 35] The Get ty shall aDirect incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A- 27.003, 68A- 27.004, and 68A- 27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 7.1.2 [Revised text, page 36] Within areas of Collier County, excluding the lands contained in the RLSA Overlay, non - agricultural development, excluding individual single family residences, shall be directed away from listed species and their habitats by complying with the following guidelines and standards: (1) A wildlife survey shall be required for all parcels when listed species are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site or where listed species are directly observed on the site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Words underlined are added; words StFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words del ablo stfuel( through are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 21 ( USFWS) guidelines. The County shall notify the FFWCC and USFWS of the existence of any listed species that may be discovered. (2) Wildlife habitat management plans for listed species shall be submitted for County approval. A plan shall be required for all projects where the wildlife survey indicated listed species are utilizing the site, or the site contains potential habitat for listed species. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. (a) Management plans shall incorporate proper techniques to protect listed species and their habitat from the negative impacts of proposed development. Developments shall be clustered to discourage impacts to listed species habitats. Open space and vegetation preservation requirements shall be used to establish buffer areas between wildlife habitat areas and areas dominated by human activities. Provisions such as fencing, walls, or other obstructions shall be provided to minimize development impacts to the wildlife and to facilitate and encourage wildlife to use wildlife corridors. Appropriate roadway crossings, underpasses, and signage shall be used where roads must cross wildlife corridors 1. Management guidelines contained in publications utilized by the FFWCC and USFWS as their technical assistance shall be used for developing required management plans. The a. South F 'a Multi c Reeeyer -y Plan r rcFWS 9 1 ♦ V, 1 l 99 b. Habitat T T t Guidelines the R 1' Eagle tl- Southeast Region, c�rxy, anagemen 1987. Populations found on hands Sla4ed fef Large Seale Development in Flefida, Teehnieal Repet4 No. 4, Florida Game and Fresh Watef! Fish Cenunission, d. Ecology and Development Related Habitat Requirements of the Fier-ida Serub i . Fish G sion, 1994- e. Eeology and Habitat Proteetion Needs of the Southeastern Amer4ean Kestrel (Falee Span,efitts Paulus) on Laf!ge scale Development Sites in Fier-ida, Nongafne Teehineal Report No. , Florida Game and Fresh Water- Fish Commission, • 2. The County shall consider any other techniques recommended by the USFWS and the FFWCC, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. 3. When listed species are directly observed on site or indicated by evidence, such as denning, foraging or other indications, priority shall be given to preserving the listed species habitats first, as a part of the retained native vegetation requirement contained in Policy 6.1.1 and Policy 6.1.2 this element. The County shall also consider the recommendations of other agencies, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (b) For parcels containing gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus), priority shall be given to protecting the largest most contiguous gopher tortoise habitat with the greatest number of active burrows, and for providing a connection to off site adjacent gopher tortoise preserves. (c) Habitat preservation for the Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) shall conform to the guidelines contained in Technical Report No. 8, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, 1991. The required management plan shall also provide for a maintenance program and specify an appropriate fire or mechanical protocols to maintain the natural scrub community. The plan shall also outline a public awareness program to educate residents about the on -site preserve and the need to maintain the scrub vegetation. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. Words underlined are added; words StFUsk thmugh are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words doalbleff# are deleted -as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 22 (d) For the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), the required habitat management plans shall establish protective zones around the eagle nest restricting certain activities. The plans shall also address restricting certain types of activities during the nesting season. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi - Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (e) For the red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), the required habitat protection plan shall outline measures to avoid adverse impacts to active clusters and to minimize impacts to foraging habitat. Where adverse effects cannot be avoided, measures shall be taken to minimize on -site disturbance and compensate or mitigate for impacts that remain. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (f) In areas where the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) may be present, the management plans shall require that garbage be placed in bear -proof containers, at one or more central locations. The management plan shall also identify methods to inform local residents of the concerns related to interaction between black bears and humans. Mitigation for- impaeting habitat suitable far- black 1 it be eonsidered in the management plan, (g) For projects located in Priority I and Priority II Panther Habitat areas, the management plan shall discourage the destruction of undisturbed, native habitats that are preferred by the Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) by directing intensive land uses to currently disturbed areas. Preferred habitats include pine flatwoods and hardwood hammocks. In turn, these areas shall be buffered from the most intense land uses of the project by using low intensity land uses (e.g., parks, passive recreational areas, golf courses). Golf courses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District shall be designed and managed using standards found in that district. The management plans shall identify appropriate lighting controls for these permitted uses and shall also address the opportunity to utilize prescribed burning to maintain fire - adapted preserved vegetative communities and provide browse for white - tailed deer. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of paragraph (3) of this policy. (h)In order to protect loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and other listed sea turtles that nest along Collier County beaches, projects within 300 feet of the MHW line shall limit outdoor lighting to that necessary for security and safety. Floodlights and landscape or accent lighting shall be prohibited. These requirements shall be consistent with the UFWS South Florida Multi- Species Recovery Plan, May 1999, subject to the provisions of Policy 7.1.2(3). (i) The Management Plans shall contain a monitoring program for developments greater than 10 acres. (3) The County shall, consistent with applicable GMP policies, consider and utilize recommendations and letters of technical assistance from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and recommendations from the US Fish and Wildlife Service in issuing development orders on property containing listed species. It is recognized that these agency recommendations, on a case by case basis, may change the requirements contained within these wildlife protection policies and any such change shall be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policy 7.1.3 [Revised text, page 38] FoF the County's Rufal Lands Stewardship AFea (PrLSA) OveFlay, as designated en the , Listed species within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area (RLSA) shall be protected pursuant to the RLSA Overlay RLS?4 policies foun l within the Future Land Use Element Words underlined are added; words stPdsk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words dos ible stpwel( t are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 23 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 7.1.6: [Revised text, page 381 The County shall continue to evaluate the need for the protection of listed plants and within one "` year- of the _ ffeetive date of this ____ endm° adopt land development regulations, as needed, addfessing the toyprotectien -o€ listed plants. OBJECTIVE 7.2 [Revised text, page 38] County's Hister-ieal data frem 1990 1996 shows tha4 the aver-age number- of manatee deaths in Collier- GeufAy due to ineidents with watefer-aft is approximately 3.2 per- year- per- 10,000 bOats. ThAotigh Mieies 7.2.1 t4atigh 7.2.3, the Minimize the number of manatee deaths due to boat related incidents. (Historical data from 1990 -1996 shows that the average number of manatee deaths in Collier County, due to incidents with watercraft is approximately 3.2 per year per 10,000 boats.) * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 7.3• [Revised text, page 39] Affialysis of histofieal data ffofn 1996 1999 shows that the avefage numbef of sea tuftle disefier4ations the following peheies, the ' Minimize the number of sea turtle disorientations. (Analysis of historical data from 2005 - 2009 shows that the average number of sea turtle disorientations is approximately equal to 4% of the hatchlings from all nests in the County.) Policy 7.3.1: [Revised text, page 39] The County shall apply the lighting criteria contained in Policy 7.1.2(2)(O(h) of this eElement in order to protect sea turtle hatchlings from adverse lighting conditions. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 7.4: [Revised text, page 39] -T Count), shall ^Continue to improve marine fisheries productivity by enhancing existing artificial reefs and building additional artificial reefs. Policy 7.4.1: [Revised text, page 39] The County should shall continue to apply for reef construction grants and /or other available or similar fundin and annually place more materials on the existing permitted sites. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words struck #rem are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words doi ible stwlek. thre- ---nlh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 24 GOAL 9: [Revised text, page 41 ] TO APPROPRIATELY MANAGE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S POPULOUS AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. OBJECTIVE 9.1: [Revised text, page 41 ] The GeufAy shall implement Maintain and update biennially a hazardous materials emergency response element as part of its the Count's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 9.1.6: [Revised text, page 41 ] An emergency response training program shall be de- ed maintained for emergency response personnel. Policy 9.1.7: [Revised text, page 41 ] The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services Management Depaftment shall be responsible for developing, implementing, and evaluating the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Pplan, including periodic updates. OBJECTIVE 9.2: [Revised text, page 41 ] The GoupAy shall Verify the management and disposal practices of identified businesses that are potential generators of hazardous waste, at a rate of 20% of these businesses per year. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 9.2.3: [Revised text, page 421 The Collier County Pollution Control and Prevent Department of Environmental D...,teetio (F-DEP) to estab with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection ofthis agr-eeffl-eint sb.,,11he to ensure Win layer- el to be compliant with federal, state and local hazardous wa * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break i Department shall work with the Florid 4sh maintain its anew cooperative agreement between the County an LPFP The 'regulatory oversight in enforcing businesses ste management regulations. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 9.4: [Revised text, page 42] The County sna11 ee„tinue to implement it's Maintain the County's local storage tank compliance program. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words FtFUGk thmugh are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words st He., thillroun.h. are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 25 Policy 9.4.3: [Revised text, page 42] All storage tank systems in Cdr the County shall adhere to the provisions of Section 62 -761 or 62- 762, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) as applicable. Unlesr- othp.--k- pred °a for- wi Seetion 62 761, F.A.G., individual storage tank systems shall adhere to the pr-ovisions of Seetion - 761, F.A.G., in effeet at the time of approval of the storage tank system. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** GOAL 10: [Revised text, page 43] THE COUNTY SH A I T TO PROTECT, CONSERVE, MANAGE, AND APPROPRIATELY USE "-2S THE COUNTY'S COASTAL BARRIERS INCLUDING SHORELINES, BEACHES AND DUNES AND SALILL PLAN FOR, AND WHERE APPROPRIATE, WILL RESTRICT ACTIVITIES WHERE SUCH ACTIVITIES WILL DAMAGE OR DESTROY COASTAL RESOURCES. OBJECTIVE 10.1: [Revised text, page 43] Priorities for shoreline land use shall be given to water dependent uses over water related land uses and shall be based on type of water - dependent use, adjacent land use, and surrounding marine and upland habitat considerations. (The Collier County Manatee Protection Plan (NR- SP- 93 -01) May 1995 restricts the location of marinas and may limit the number of wet slips, the construction of dry storage facilities, and boat ramps, based upon the Plan's marina siting criteria.) Policy 10.1.1: [Revised text, page 43] The County shall Pprioritizees €er water - dependent and water - related uses as follows sha:41 be: a. Public recreational facilities over private recreational facilities; b. Public Bboat Rramps; C. Marinas 1. Commercial (public) marinas over private marinas; 2. Dry storage over wet storage; d. Commercial fishing facilities; e. Other non - polluting water - dependent industries or utilities; f. Marine supply /repair facilities; g. Residential development. Policy 10.1.2: [New text, page 43] Identify recreational and commercial working waterfronts and then investigate strategies for possible implementation as feasible, to ensure protection and preservation of those waterfronts. Policy 10.1.23: Policy 10.134: [Renumbered text, page 43] [Renumbered text, page 43] Words underlined are added; words struGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words double are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 26 A Policy 10.1.45: [Renumbered text, page 43] Policy 10.1.56: [Renumbered and revised text, page 44] Marinas and all other water - dependent and water - related 'uses shall conform to all applicable regulations regarding development in marine wetlands. Marinas development that includes and wa;e- - to-d-y the destruction of marine wetlands shall provide for general public use. (Marine wetlands are defined as areas with a water regime determined primarily by tides and the dominant vegetation is salt tolerant plant species including those species listed in subsection 62- 301.200(3) F A C "Submerged Marine Species.") [Shaded text: outstanding substantive issues remain - see Staff memo.] Policy 10.1.67: [Renumbered and revised text, page 44] For development of Aall new marinas, water - dependent and water - related uses that propose to destroy marine wetlands; the applicant shall be required to perform a fiscal analysis in order to demonstrate the puke benefit and- financial feasibility of the proposed development. [Shaded text: outstanding substantive issues remain - see Staff memo Policy 10.1.78: OBJECTIVE 10.2: [Renumbered text, page 43] [Revised text, page 44] The County shall eentinue to iEnsure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and continue with ids the County's program to expand the availability of such access and a method to fund its acquisition. Policy 10.2.1: [Revised text, page 44] Existing aeeess fof t public to the beach access shall be maintained by new development. New beachfront development shall show on their site -plans existing beach access ways and the proposed development shall continue that access way, relocate it on the site as deemed appropriate by County, or donate it to the County. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 10.3: [Revised text, page 45] Maintain Uundeveloped coastal barriers, mapped as part of the Federal Coastal Barrier Resources System, shall be maintained predominantly in their natural state and protect, maintain and enhance their natural function shall be pfotee4ed, maintained and e hanee({'. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words struGk4hrG* are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 27 OBJECTIVE 10.4: [Revised text, page 46] Developed Boast ers- and - developed shofelines shall be eerrtintied to be- r_Restored and then maintained, when appropriate, developed coastal barriers and developed shorelines, by establishing mechanisms or projects which limit the effects of development and whieh help it the restoresatien e€ the natural functions of coastal barriers, including and afeeted beaches and dunes. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 10.5: [Revised text, page 481 For undeveloped shorelines, provide improved opportunities for recreational, educational, scientific, and aesthetic enjoyment of coastal resources. This shall be accomplished by protecting beaches and dunes and by utilizing existing construction standards, or where necessary, establishing new construction standards, which will minimize the impact of manmade structures on the beach and dune systems. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 10.6: [Revised text, page 49] The County shall eConserve the habitats, species, natural shoreline and dune systems contained within the County's coastal zone. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 10.6.2: [Revised text, page 50] The owners of Fef shoreline development projects Mere that require an EIS isifed, shall provide an analysis shall that demonstrates that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six -inch rise in sea level. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** GOAL 12: [Revised text, page 52] TO MAKE EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY FROM THE EFFECTS OF HURRICANE STORM DAMAGE. OBJECTIVE 12.1: [Revised text, page 52] The County will ""Maintain hurricane evacuation clearance times as required by state law. An evacuation clearance time shall be defined as having residents and visitors in an appropriate refuge away from storm surge prior to the arrival of sustained Tropical Storm force winds, i.e., winds equal to or greater than 39 mph. To further thisese objectives, for future mobile home developments located Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words cig hlo cir, w1c throt wh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 28 outside of the storm surge zone, such development shall include on -site sheltering or retro - fitting of an adjacent facility. The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services Managemef4 Depaftment shall seek opportunities to increase shelter facilities and associated capacities under the direction of the Department of the Florida Division of Emergency Management. Policy 12.1.1: [Revised text, page 52] Collie r The County wi44 shall develop continue to enhance and maintain a comprehensive public awareness program. The program will be publicized prior to May 30th of each year. Evacuation zones, public shelters and evacuation routes shall be pfinted i provided to each local newspaper, displayed on the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services' Management website, and the availability of this information will be discussed on local television newscasts. This information shall also be made readily available to all hotel /motel guests. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 12.1.3: [Revised text, page 52] The County shall continue to identify and maintain shelter space for 32,000 persons by 201296 and 45,000 by 20154 -0. Shelter space capacity wi44 shall be determined at the rate of 20 square feet per person. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 12.1.5: [Revised text, page 52] On -site shelters within mobile home parks or mobile home subdivisions shall be elevated to a minimum height equal to or above the worst case Category 3 hurricane flooding level, based upon the mest current National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's storm surge model, known as Sea, Lake, and Overland Surges from Hurricanes (SLOSH). The wind load criteria for buildings and structures designated as "essential facilities" in the latest Florida Building Code, shall guide the design and construction of the required shelters. Shelters shall be constructed with emergency electrical power and potable water supplies; shall provide glass protection by shutters or other approved material /device; and shall provide for ventilation, sanitary facilities and first aid equipment. A telephone, automatic external defibrillator (AED) and battery- operated radio with NOAA weather Specific Area Message Encoded capability are also required within the shelter. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 12.1.7: [Revised text, page 53] The County, in coordination with the municipalities within the County, shall update the hurricane evacuation portion of the Collier County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan prior to June 1St of each year by integrating all appropriate regional and State emergency plans in the identification of emergency evacuation routes. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words dough are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 29 Policy 12.1.9: [Revised text, page 53] Collier The County through its Local Mitigation Working Group shall annually update its approved I4azar-d Local Mitigation Strategy Plan-, €efmerl as the "r .,l 14az ,,.a Mitigation ctfategy" through the identification and review of new or ongoing local hazard mitigation projects and including, identifying the appropriate funding sources for such projects. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * * * ** * ** * ** Policy 12.1.11: [Revised text, page 53] The County will shall continue to coordinate with Collier County Public Schools to ensure that all new public schools outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area are designed and constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria, as contained in "State Requirements for Educational Facilities" (449-4 2007). Policy 12.1.12: [Revised text, page 53] The County wi44 shall continue to work with the Board of Regents of the State University System to ensure that all new facilities in the State University System that are located outside of the Coastal High Hazard Area are designed and constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria, as contained in "State Requirements for Educational Facilities" (49-8 2007) and the Florida Building Code. Policy 12.1.13: [Revised text, page 53] The County wiJ4 shall continue to mitigate previously identified shelter deficiencies through mitigation from Developments of Regional Impact, Emergency Management Preparedness and Enhancement grants, Hazard Mitigation and Pre - disaster Mitigation Grant Programs funding, and from available funds identified in the State's annual shelter deficit studies. Poliey 12.1.44- 4 [Deleted text, page 53] _N Policy 12.1.14 -5: [Revised text, page 55] All new nursing homes and assisted living facilities that are licensed f f more than 15 elients will shall have a core area to shelter residents and staff on site. The core area will be constructed to meet the Public Shelter Design Criteria that is required for new public schools and public community colleges and universities ( "State Requirements for Educational Facilities," 2007 49W). Additionally this area shall be capable of ventilation or air conditioning provided by back -up generator for a period of no less than 48 72 hours. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words StFUGk are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words nh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 30 Policy 12.1.167: [Revised text, page 541 Giro„ C,,,mty is .,duet;,,,.., u,,,... ;, ane Eyae,,. Rio Stu4< If warranted by the results of that study, Hurricane Evacuation Studies that are periodically conducted by the State of Florida and/or Federal Authorities, further restriction on development may be proposed. OBJECTIVE 12.2: [Revised text, page 541 The Gout y shat °Ensure that publicly funded buildings and publicly funded development activities are carried out in a manner that demonstrates best practice to minimize the loss of life, property, and re- building cost from the effects from hurricanes, flooding, natural and technological disaster events. Best practice efforts may include, but are not limited to: a. Construction above the flood plain; b. maintaining a protective zone for wildfire mitigation; c. installation of on -site permanent generators or temporary generator emergency connection points; d. beach and dune restoration, re- nourishment, or emergency protective actions to minimize the loss of structures from future events; e. emergency road repairs; f. repair and /or replacement of publicly owned docking facilities, parking areas, and sea walls, etc. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 12.2.5: [Revised text, page 55] The County shall consider the Coastal High Hazard Area as a geographical area lying below the elevation of withi the Category 1 storm surge line zone as presently defined in the 2011 2-0" Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council's Hurricane Evacuation Study, or subsequently authorized storm surge or evacuation planning studies coordinated by the Collier County Emergency Management Department and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 12.3: [Revised text, page 55] The County shall aDevelop and maintain a task force that will plan and guide a unified County response to post - hurricane disasters. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 12.3.2: [Revised text, page 55] After a h,,f fieane that neeessitated an evaeuatiopkl tThe Board of County Commissioners shall meet to hear preliminary damage assessments after a hurricane that has necessitated an evacuation. This will be done r-e e", of -the population. At that time, the Commission wi44 may activate the recovery task force and consider a temporary moratorium on building activities not necessary for the public health, safety and welfare. Words underlined are added; words GtFUGk are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 31 Policy 12.3.3: [Revised text, page 55] The Recovery Task Force shall include the Sheriff of Gellier r eun4", the CaRun, nit- , Development and Envifonf end— Sei=viees Growth Management Division Administrator, the Gempfehea Planning the Zoning a Land Development Services die Director, the Bureau of Emergency Services Management Director and other members as directed by the Board of County Commissioners, such as. The Board should also inel de representatives from municipalities within Collie the County that have received damage from the a storm to beeeme member -s of the Reeoyer- , Fe Task T„sk z rvrcz. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 12.4: [Revised text, page 56] The County shall make every reasonable effort to meet the emergency preparedness requirements of people Persons with sSpecial nNeeds such as the elderly, handicapped, the infirmed and those requiring transportation from a threatened area. In the event of a countywide emergency, such as a hurricane or other large -scale disaster, the County Emergency Management Department in coordination with the County Health Department and other officials shall open and operate one or more refuges for persons listed on the County's Special Needs Registry and their caregivers. Medical and support equipment at such refuges will include, but not necessarily be limited to, respirators, oxygen tanks, first aid equipment, disaster cots and blankets, and defibrillators. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** EAR based amendments -CCME — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 3/1/12 G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive12011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTSICCPC Transmittal\Elements\CCME -MM Words underlined are added; words StFUGk are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 32 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element- CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goal, Objectives, and Policies Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) COLLIER COUNTY WILL MAINTAIN OR ENHANCE THE LEVEL OF COORDINATION AND COOPERATION AMONG THE VARIOUS GOVERNMENTS, AUTHORITIES AND AGENCIES MAKING DECISIONS AFFECTING NATURAL RESOURCES, HOUSING, HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES, PUBLIC FACILITIES, AND PUBLIC SERVICES WITHIN AND AROUND COLLIER COUNTY TO RESOLVE DIFFERENCES AND TO ACHIEVE COMPATIBLE AND COORDINATED PLANS. OBJECTIVE 1: [Revised text, page 3] Collier County (County) shall continue to establish and maintain intergovernmental communication and level of service coordination mechanisms to be used by the County, Everglades City, the City of Marco Island, the City of Naples, and the City of Bonita Springs, adjacent Lee County, Hendry County, Broward County, Dade County, Monroe County, the District School Board of Collier County School Board, the State of Florida, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Florida Department of Transportation. and South Florida Water Management District, and any other entity that provides a service but may not have land use authority. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.2: [Revised text, page 3] The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Dot Section shall be the designated liaison to disseminate information on proposed Growth Management Plan amendments under review by the County, which have the potential to affect any of the entities listed in Objective 1. Words underlined are added; words stFUsk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words double struok thmugh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element- CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 1.3: [Revised text, page 3] The Collier County Comprehensive Planning Dew Section shall continue to prepare and review the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) as an annual level of service monitoring report for the capital facilities included within the Growth Management Plan. The purpose of this report is to provide the affected entities with the necessary information to evaluate and coordinate level of service standards. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 2: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 3] The County shall e Coordinate its County land use planning strategy, including an assessment of proposed development, with that of other governmental and private entities. Policy 2.1: [Revised text, page 4] Collier County will continue to identify, develop, and pursue areas where intergovernmental land use planning and level of service agreements are needed between the County and respeetive qppropriate governmental or private entities. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.6: [Revised text, page 4] The County shall continue to coordinate with The District School Board of Collier County for collaborative planning and decision making on population projections, the public school site selection for new public educational and ancillary facilities, and the location and extension of public facilities subject to concurrency, to support existing and proposed public educational facilities in , 2003 by Gollief Cew4yveheel Beafd and E)a May .'7, 2002 by the Board of County Commissioner-s, an-, as s4sequendy amended and festated, with an eff-eetive date of Deeembef 2008, and the Seh Board Review (SBR) inter-leeal Agfeement adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier- County * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.8: [Revised text, page 4] The County shall coordinate with the South Florida Water Management District and other regulatory agencies in implementing the Growth Management Plan. Policy 2.9: [Revised text, page 4] The County shall continue to coordinate with The District School Board of Collier County for the regulatory review of residential development for school concurrency in aeeer -danee =A,i Seetion 163.3180(13) Fier-ida Statutes. Words underlined are added; words stfuGk thFougb are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words �-ble struiek. th-aug-h. are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Intergovernmental Coordination Element- CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 OBJECTIVE 3: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", page 5] C^"' °r County shall a Develop procedures to identify and implement joint planning areas for the purposes of municipal annexation, municipal incorporation and joint infrastructure services areas. Policy 3.1 [Revised text, page 5] Based "on SeetionW3-015 (3)(^` ^., Flefi ^ ^ aminist alive Code, Collier County shall work with the local municipalities to identify and implement joint planning areas and/or joint infrastructure service areas for the purpose of planning for potential future municipal annexation of such areas. The identified joint planning areas and/or joint infrastructure service areas shall be depicted on the County's Future Land Use Map series. EAR -ICE — CCPC Consent Final Draft — 2117112 G: \CDES Planning Services \Comprehensive\2011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTS\ CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda Materials\ ELEMENTS for March 1 CCPC\ICE — CCPC Consent 2 -17 -12 CV1CS Words underlined are added; words Stfusk thFough are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words g# are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 3 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 Goal, Objectives and Policies Future Land Use Element (FLUE) IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL: TO GUIDE LAND USE DECISION - MAKING SO AS TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WITH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH PROMOTE THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE CONSISTENT WITH STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL DESIRES. [No change to text — provided for context, page 11 ] OBJECTIVE 1: [No change to text — provided for context, page 11 ] Unless otherwise permitted in this Growth Management Plan, new or revised uses of land shall be consistent with designations outlined on the Future Land Use Map. The Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts and Sub - districts shall be binding on all Development Orders effective with the adoption of this Growth Management Plan. Standards and permitted uses for each Future Land Use District and Subdistrict are identified in the Designation Description Section. Through the magnitude, location and configuration of its components, the Future Land Use Map is designed to coordinate land use with the natural environment including topography, soil and other resources; promote a sound economy; coordinate coastal population densities with the Regional Hurricane Evacuation Plan; and discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 1.4: [Revised text, page 12] The CONSERVATION Future Land Use Designation shall may include a Future Land Use District. Policy 1.5: [re- lettered to reflect merger of Ordinance No. 2002 -32 and 2002 -541 [Revised text, page 12] Overlays and Special Features shall include: A. Area of Critical State Concern Overlay B. North Belle Meade Overlay C. Natural Resource Protection Area Overlays D. Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay E. Airport Noise Area Overlay F. Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay G. Urban -Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay H. Coastal High Hazard Area Boundary I. Incorporated Areas DRAFT Words underlined are added; words strosk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. 1 Words double underlined are added; words do, are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. EAR -based GMP Amendments * ** * ** * ** * ** Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft * ** text break * ** * ** * ** 2 -21 -12 * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 2: [No change to text – provided for context, page 12] The coordination of land uses with the availability of public facilities shall be accomplished through the Concurrency Management System of the Capital Improvements Element and implemented through the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance of the Land Development Code. Policy 2.1: [Revised text, page 12] The County shall prepare annually the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities which shall include a determination of the existing conditions of capital public facilities, determine the remaining available capacity, forecast future needs in the five year capital improvement schedule and identify needed improvements and funding to maintain the level of service adopted in Policy 44—. -5 1_5 of the Capital Improvements Element. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.4 [Revised text, page 13] Pursuant to Rule 9J- 5.0055(6)(a) 3., Florida Administrative Code and the Urban Infill and Urban Redevelopment Strategy contained in this Element, development located within the South U.S. 41 Transportation Concurrency Exception Area (TCEA) (See Map TR -4) may be exempt from transportation concurrency requirements, so long as impacts to the transportation system are mitigated using the procedures set forth in Policy 5.5 of the Transportation Element. ■ Wif .. wo ._ .� .. ■ • 111N.M. 011111I I Is PTX ■ Wif .. .. Developments within the South U.S. 41 TCEA that do not obtain certification pursuant to Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element shall meet all concurrency requirements. Whether or not a concurrency exception is requested, developments shall be subject to a concurrency review for the purpose of reserving capacity for those trips associated with the development and maintaining accurate counts of the remaining capacity on the roadway network. DRAFT Words underlined are added; words strusk-through are deleted — as recommended by staff. 2 Words double underlined are added; words are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 Policy 2.5 [Revised text, pages 13 -14] The County shaU has designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMA) to encourage compact urban development where an integrated and connected network of roads is in place that provides multiple, viable alternative travel paths or modes for common trips. Performance within each TCMA shall be measured based on the percentage of lane miles meeting the LOS described in Policies 1.3 and 1.4 of the Transportation Element. Standards within TCMAs are provided in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element. New Development within each TCMA shall be consistent with the criteria set forth in Objective 6, and Policies 6.1 through 6.5 of this Element. The following Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are hereby designated: 1. Northwest TCMA — This area is bounded by the Collier - Lee County Line on the north side; the west side of the I -75 right -of -way on the east side; Pine Ridge Road on the south side; and, the Gulf of Mexico on the west side (See Map TR -5). 2. East Central TCMA — This area is bounded by Pine Ridge Road on the north side; Collier Boulevard on the east side; Davis Boulevard on the south side, and; Livingston Road extended) on the west side (See Map TR -6). * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 3: [No change to text — provided for context, page 14] Land Development Regulations have been adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan pursuant to Chapter 163.3202, Florida Statutes (F.S.), in order to ensure protection of natural and historic resources, ensure the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 4: [No change to text — provided for context, page 16] In order to improve coordination of land uses with natural and historic resources, public facilities, economic development, housing and urban design, the Future Land Use Element shall be continually refined through detailed planning. Future studies might address specific geographic or issue areas. All future studies must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan and further its intent. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 4.5: [Revised text, page 16] An Industrial Land Use Study has been developed and a summary of the Study has been incorporated into the support document of this Growth Management Plan. The Study includes a detailed inventory of industrial uses, projections of demand for industrial land, and recommendations for future land use allocations and locational criteria. The detailed inventory of industrial land uses will be periodically gpdated. Subse quent to ,.,.mpletie DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stfuGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. 3 Words double underlined are added; words d-ou-ble str, wic thra, ah are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element - CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 4.7: [Revised text, page 17] The Board of County Commissioners may consider whether to adopt redevelopment plans for existing commercial and residential areas. Such plans may include alternative land uses, modifications to development standards, and incentives that may be necessary to encourage redevelopment. Such redevelopment plans may only be prepared by the County or its agent unless otherwise authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. The Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on March I4, June 13, 2000; it encompasses the Bayshore Drive corridor and the triangle area formed by US 41 East, Davis Boulevard and Airport- Pulling Road. The Immokalee Redevelopment Plan was adopted by the Board on June 13, 2000. Other specific areas that may be considered by the Board of County Commissioners for redevelopment include, but are not necessarily limited to: a. Pine Ridge Road, between U.S. 41 North and Goodlette -Frank Road; b. U.S. 41 North in Naples Park; and, C. Bonita Beach Road between Vanderbilt Drive and the west end of Little Hickory Shores #1 Subdivision. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 4.11 [Revised text, page 18] in the next Eva4uatien and Appfaisal Repeft (EAR), due januar-y 1, 2011, Collier- Ceunt� will - identify as an issue to be- addfessed, the need to align antes ithiffl the vffir- elements the plafming time ffame fer- the Futufe Land Use Map, the Rufal hands Stewardship .,% M9r." * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 5: [No change to text - provided for context, page 18] In order to promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element, the following general land use policies shall be implemented upon the adoption of the Growth Management Plan. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** DRAFT Words underlined are added; words dough are deleted - as recommended by staff. 4 Words double underlined are added; words d-aab1� are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 Policy 5.3: [Revised text, page 19] Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map; requiring that any ehanges additions to the Urban Designated Areas be contiguous to an existing Urban Area boundary; and, encouraging the use of creative land use planning techniques and innovative approaches to development in the County's Agricultural /Rural designated area, which will better serve to protect environmentally sensitive areas, maintain the economic viability of agriculture and other predominantly rural land uses, and provide for cost efficient delivery of public facilities and services. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 5.14: [pages 21 -22] [note: revisions to this policy are not depicted below, pending action on a new Interlocal Agreement] Public educational plants and ancillary plants: a. Existing public educational plants and ancillary plants: The sites containing existing public educational plants (schools and associated on -site facilities, including sports stadiums, gymnasiums and recreation areas) and ancillary plants (support facilities, including administrative offices, transportation facilities, maintenance yards, and bus barns) are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series and Public School Facilities Element Map Series. This includes four sites where educational plants have been approved but construction either has not commenced or is not completed. More detailed descriptions or depictions of all of the sites containing these existing educational plants and ancillary plants are contained in the FLUE Support Document. Expansion of these educational plants and ancillary plants on these existing sites, as well as expansions to the sites themselves, are subject to the provisions outlined in the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land development regulations. b. Existing sites for future public educational plants: The Collier County School Board has acquired numerous sites for which educational plants are planned for future development; these sites contain no existing educational plants. These sites are consistent with locational criteria established by the SBR Interlocal Agreement and as contained in the FLUE, GGAMP, or IAMP, as applicable, and are allowed within the existing zoning district on the property. These sites are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series and Public School Facilities Element Map Series. Development of the mapped sites shall be subject to the provisions of the general Interlocal Agreement adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stfuGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. 5 Words double underlined are added; words de-w-ble stpu� are deleted -as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land development regulations. C. Existing sites for future public ancillary plants: The Collier County School Board has acquired sites for which ancillary plants are planned for future development; these sites contain no existing ancillary plants. These sites are consistent with locational criteria established by the SBR Interlocal Agreement and as contained in the FLUE, GGAMP, or IAMP, as applicable, and are allowed within the existing zoning district on the property. These sites are depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series and Public School Facilities Element Map Series. Development of the mapped sites shall be subject to the provisions of the general Interlocal Agreement adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and subject to the implementing land development regulations. d. Future sites for public educational plants and ancillary plants: As additional sites for educational plants and ancillary plants are acquired by the Collier County School Board and deemed to be consistent with the FLUE, GGAMP, or IAMP, as applicable, and allowed by existing zoning on the site, these sites will be added to the Future Land Use Map Series and Public School Facilities Element Map Series, as provided for in the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and subject to the implementing land development regulations to be adopted; and, shall be subject to and the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. Future development of these sites will be subject to the provisions of the aforementioned general Interlocal Agreement and SBR Interlocal Agreement, and subject to the implementing land development regulations. Prior to site acquisition, the Collier County School District will provide notification to property owners as follows: 1) for sites located within the Urban Designated Area of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan, notices shall be sent to all owners of property within 500 linear feet of the property lines of the site under consideration for acquisition; 2) for sites not located within the Urban Designated Area of the FLUE of the Growth Management Plan, notices shall be sent to all owners of property within 1,000 linear feet of the property lines of the site under consideration for acquisition. At the public hearing to consider the land acquisition, all public DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. 6 Words double underlined are added; words d��u are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 commentary received as a result of these notices will be provided to the Collier County School Board. Zoning district provisions for future educational plants: Except to the extent that such would be in conflict with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District adopted on June 19, 2002, or the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay adopted on October 22, 2002, all future educational plants shall be allowed in zoning districts as follows: (1) Educational plants are prohibited in the Residential Tourist (RT), Golf Course (GC),Conservation (CON), Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC), Business Park (BP), and Industrial (I) zoning districts. (2) Educational plants are permitted by right in all other zoning districts. However, for a high school facility to be located in any residential zoning district, or Estates (E) zoning district, or residential component of a PUD, a formal compatibility review and determination is required, as set forth in the general Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners, and as subsequently amended and restated, with an effective date of December 2008, and the School Board Review (SBR) Interlocal Agreement, adopted on May 15, 2003 by the Collier County School Board and on May 27, 2003 by the Board of County Commissioners. f. Zoning district provisions for future ancillary plants: Except to the extent that such would be in conflict with the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District adopted on June 19, 2002, or the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay adopted on October 22, 2002, all future ancillary plants shall be allowed in zoning districts as follows: (1) Ancillary plants are prohibited in the Residential Single Family (RSF -1 through RSF -6), Mobile Home (MH), Travel Trailer Recreational Vehicle Campground (TTRVC), Golf Course (GC), and Conservation (CON) zoning districts. (2) Ancillary plants are permitted by right in the General Commercial (C -4), Heavy Commercial (C -5), and Industrial (I) zoning districts. (3) Ancillary plants are permitted by conditional use approval in all other zoning districts. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Objective 6 [Revised text, page 23] Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) are geographically compact areas designated in local government comprehensive plans where intensive development exists, or such development is planned. New development within a TCMA shall occur in a manner that will ensure an adequate level of mobility (as defined in Policy 5.8 of the Transportation Element) and further the achievement of the following identified important state planning goals and policies: discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl, protecting natural resources, protecting historic resources, maximizing the DRAFT Words underlined are added; words StFUGk t4sugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. 7 Words double underlined are added; words ink th. are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 efficient use of existing public facilities, and promoting public transit, bicycling, walking and other alternatives to the single occupant automobile. Transportation Concurrency Management Areas are hefeby have been established in the specific geographic areas described in Policy 2.5 of this Element. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 6.3: [Revised text, page 24] In order to be exempt from link specific concurrency, new residential development or redevelopment within Collier County's designated Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs) shall utilize at least two of the following Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies, as may be applicable: a) Including neighborhood commercial uses within a residential project. b) Providing transit shelters within the development (must be coordinated with Collier County Transit). c) Providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, with connections to abutting commercial properties. ,7\ T._..1..,]: -- _4r4r ..,7,.1..1,. L.,..,.. : «,. /.-...: «.,.,,,.,., „7' 7G0% .,F +1, A, +1,o e) d) Vehieul Providing vehicular access to abutting commercial properties. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 7 [Revised text, page 24] In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 7.3 [Revised text, page 24] All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 7.7 [Revised text, page 25] The Conununity revelment - and -1 nvir- opanentall Serviees Growth Management Division will continue to research smart growth practices in an effort to improve the future of Collier County by specifically addressing land use and transportation planning techniques for inclusion in future land development regulations. DRAFT Words underlined are added; words strusk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. 8 Words double underlined are added; words d-e-W-ble stridek. t4rouo are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element— CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION [No change to text — provided for context, page 26] The following section describes the land use designations shown on the Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or on special studies completed for the County. L URBAN DESIGNATION [No change to text — provided for context, page 26] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** A. Urban Mixed Use District [No change to text — provided for context, page 28] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** B. DENSITY RATING SYSTEM: [No change to text — provided for context, page 47] This Density Rating System is only applicable to areas designated on the Future Land Use Map as: Urban, Urban Mixed Use District; and, on a very limited basis, Agricultural /Rural. It is not applicable to the Urban areas encompassed by the Immokalee Area Master Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan; these two Elements have their own density provisions. The Density Rating System is applicable to that portion of the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict to the extent that the residential density cap of 4 dwelling units per acre is not exceeded, except for the density bonus provisions for Affordable Housing and Transfer of Development Rights, and except as provided for in the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. The final determination of permitted density via implementation of this Density Rating System is made by the Board of County Commissioners through an advertised public hearing process (rezone or Stewardship Receiving Area designation). 1. The Density Rating System is applied in the following manner: [Revised text, page 48] a. Within the applicable Urban Designated Areas, a base density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, though not an entitlement. This base level of density may be adjusted depending upon the location and characteristics of the project. For purposes of calculating the eligible number of dwelling units for a project (gross acreage multiplied by eligible number of dwelling units per acre), the total number of dwelling units may be rounded up by one unit if the dwelling unit total yields a fraction of a unit .5 or greater. Acreage to be used for calculating density is exclusive o£ the commercial and industrial portions of a project, except where authorized in a Subdistrict, such DRAFT Words underlined are added; words StFUGk thFough are deleted — as recommended by staff. 9 Words double underlined are added; words dow-ble ratFueugh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 as the Orange Blossom Mixed -Use Subdistrict; and, mixed residential and commercial uses as provided for in the C -1 through C -3 zoning districts in the Collier County Land Development Code; and, portions of a project for land uses having an established equivalent residential density in the Collier County Land Development Code. b. Within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, the Density Rating System is applicable for the Affordable- workforce Housing Density Bonus only, as specifically provided for in that Subdistrict. C. Within the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay (RLSA), the Density Rating System is applicable for the Affordable - workforce Housing Density Bonus only, as specifically provided for in the RLSA for Stewardship Receiving Areas. d. This Density Rating System only applies to residential dwelling units. This Density Rating System is not applicable to accessory dwellings or accessory structures that are not intended and/or not designed and/or not authorized for permanent occupancy, and is not applicable to accessory dwellings or accessory structures intended for rental or other commercial use; such accessory dwellings and structures include guest houses, servants quarters, mother -in -law's quarters, cabanas, guest suites, and the like. e. All new residential zoning located within Districts, Subdistricts and Overlays identified above that are subject to this Density Rating System shall be consistent with this Density Rating System, except as provided in: 1) Policy 5.1 of the Future Land Use Element. 2) The Urban Mixed Use District for the "vested" Port of the Islands development. 3) The Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict. 4) The Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict. 5) The Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict. 6) Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict. 7) Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict. 2. Density Bonuses [No change to text — provided for context, page 48] Consistency with the following characteristics may add to the base density. Density bonuses are discretionary, not entitlements, and are dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with surrounding properties, as well as the rezone criteria in the Land Development Code. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stWk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. 10 Words double underlined are added; words dw u-ble &- ink are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 a. Conversion of Commercial Zoning Bonus: [Revised text, page 49] If a project includes the conversion of commercial zoning that has been found to be "Consistent By Policy" through the Collier County Zoning Re- evaluation Program (Ordinance No. 90 -23), then a bonus of up to 16 dwelling units per acre may be added for every one (1) acre of commercial zoning that is converted to residential zoning. These bonus dwelling units may be distributed over the entire project. The project must be compatible with surrounding land uses. b. Proximity to Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center: [Revised text, page 49] If the project is within one mile of a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center and located within a residential density band, 3 residential units per gross acre may be added. The density band around a Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center shall be measured by the radial distance from the center of the intersection around which the Mixed Use Activity Center or Interchange Activity Center is situated. If 50% or more of a project is within the density band, the additional density applies to the gross acreage of the entire project. Density bands are designated on the Future Land Use Map and shall not apply within the Estates Designation or for properties within the Tr ffie Gengestio Coastal High Hazard Area. C. Affordable - Workforce Housing Bonus: [Revised text, page 49] As used in this density bonus provision, the term "affordable" shall be as defined in Chapter 420.9071, F.S. To encourage the provision of affordable - workforce housing within certain Districts and Subdistricts in the Urban Designated Area, a maximum of up to 8 residential units per gross acre may be added to the base density if the project meets the requirements of the Affordable- workforce Housing Density Bonus Ordinance (Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code, Ordinance #04 -41, as amended, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004), and if the affordable - workforce housing units are targeted for families earning no greater than 150% of the median income for Collier County. In the Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict, projects utilizing the Affordable- workforce Housing Density Bonus must provide appropriate mitigation consistent with Objective 12.1 and subsequent policies, as applicable, of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Also, for those specific properties identified within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, this density bonus is allowed but only to a maximum of 6 residential units per gross acre. Additionally, the Affordable- workforce Housing Density Bonus may be utilized within the Agricultural /Rural designation, as provided for in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area Overlay, subject to the aforementioned Section 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code. DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stfusk tough are deleted — as recommended by staff. 11 Words double underlined are added; words ugtt are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** e. Roadway Access [Revised text, page 50] If the project has direct access to two or more arterial or collector roads as identified in the Transportation Element, one residential dwelling unit per gross acre may be added. Density credits based on future roadways will be awarded if the developer commits to construct a portion of the roadway (as determined by the County Transportation Department) or the road is scheduled for completion during the first five years of the Capital Improvements Plan. The Roadway Access bonus is not applicable to properties located within the T f ff:^ Gengestie Coastal High Hazard Area 3. Density Reduction Consistency with the following characteristic would subtract density: [Revised text, pages 50 -51] a. Traffie Congestion Coastal High Hazard Area If the project lies within the T- r- a€fic- Congestion Coastal High Hazard Area, an area identified „bjeet to long range tr°f e ^ °°ti^ ^, one dwelling unit per gross acre shall would be subtracted from the eligible base density of four dwelling units per acre - except for those properties within the Coastal High Hazard Area in Section 1, Township 50 South, Range 25 East. The T-r-affis Congestion Bound Coastal High Hazard Area boundary is eg nerally shown on the Future Land Use Map and is more precisely shown in the Future Land Use Map series; and eansists--of all lands lying the est°em eeastal Urban Designated Are seaward of that a boundary are within the Coastal High Hazard Area. marked by Air -po,.t nulling Rea (ine1,,. ing an &aensie ne ftl, to the Lee r,., pAy 1,..,,,,.aary.) Davis Bettlevar-d, -C6 Bafn Read, and Rattlesnake LIa,,,., eek n.,.,.1 . ist °.,t with the Mixed Use Ae fiy ty (`e t°,•'s „f Rattlesnake i7.,.v.... eek Road and (`eu mot., Road 951 (ine1,,. ing an extension to the east btA exeltisiye of the etAly ing Ufb a designated areas of !`epela„a Peet of the Tyrs,,, Plantation island, and Dskee). ivpeFties adjaeent to the T-r- fffie Gengestion AF °•, shall be eensidefed paFtof the T-r- ffie Congestion Are if their- . n!y aeeess is to a read F ,•,,-,;,-,g the he,,ndai=y of the Area; however-, if that p pet4., also has an aeeess point to ., °.l not f f ffli the betifidai=y of the Tfaffie the Tfaffie Con estien Area it will not be stibjeet. to the iensitTreduEti6n. Fuftheim9F °, the density r -ed etio shat not ,,1., t., Element, developmefAs located within the South U.S. 41 TGEA (as identified withi Map > and Tfanspoftation Element Polioies 5.5 and G , and FLUE Pokey 2.4) that ebta m an ° rccpri oizroi- concar°icy ifi �_ f-an-sper-tation Element Pokey 5.6, and that inelude aff-or-dable housing (a per- Seetti-on-2.7.7 -Af the Gellief Getinty hand DevelopmefA Code, as amended) as paFt- of the plan of development This .- eduetio shall likewise not be applied to developments within the Noftl west and past Ge tf l_TG f A s that. DRAFT Words underlined are added; words struGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. 12 Words double underlined are added; words debible struok thfough are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element— CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 r mteet ttil '�e.�F2 2"ts of FLUE E Pelieies 6.1 thfough 6.5 and T,- ans,,.., Ratio €lemen! Pelicies 5.7 and c 8, and that incltde Aff- erdable- lousing (as per Sestien7"�or the - C—ellief Genfy hand -Develc en+ Code, as rr,endead) as paFt of the plan of development. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** C. Urban Commercial District [No change to text — provided for context, page 53] This District is intended to accommodate almost all new commercial zoning; a variety of residential uses, including higher densities for properties not located within the Urban Coastal Fringe or Urban Residential Fringe Subdistricts; and a variety of non - residential uses. 1. Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict [Revised text, pages 53 -57] Mixed Use Activity Centers have been designated on the Future Land Use Map Series identified in the Future Land Use Element. The locations are based on intersections of major roads and on spacing criteria. When this Plan was originally adopted in 1989, there were 21 Activity Centers. There are now 19 Activity Centers, listed below, which comprise approximately 3,000 acres; this includes 3 Interchange Activity Centers ( #4, 9, 10) which will be discussed separately under the Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict. Two Activity Centers, #19 and 21, have been deleted as they are now within the incorporated City of Marco Island. # 1 Immokalee Road and Airport- Pulling Road # 2 US 41 and Immokalee Road # 3 Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard # 4 I -75 and Immokalee Road (Interchange Activity Center) # 5 US 41 and Vanderbilt Beach Road # 6 Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard # 7 Rattlesnake- Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard # 8 Airport- Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway # 9 I -75 and Collier Boulevard and Davis Boulevard (Interchange Activity Center) #10 I -75 and Pine Ridge Road (Interchange Activity Center) 411 Vanderbilt Beach Road and Airport- Pulling Road #12 US 41 and Pine Ridge Road #13 Airport- Pulling Road and Pine Ridge Road 914 Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway #15 Golden Gate Parkway and Coronado Boulevard #16 US 41 and Airport- Pulling Road #17 US 41 and Rattlesnake - Hammock Road #18 US 41 and Collier Boulevard #20 US 41 and Wiggins Pass Road The Mixed -Use Activity Center concept is designed to concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create DRAFT Words underlined are added; words dough are deleted — as recommended by staff. 13 Words double underlined are added; words double strunk thfouo are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 focal points within the community. Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to be mixed -use in character. Further, they are generally intended to be developed at a human- scale, to be pedestrian - oriented, and to be interconnected with abutting projects — whether commercial or residential. Street, pedestrian pathway and bike lane interconnections with abutting properties, where possible and practicable, are encouraged. Allowable land uses in Mixed Use Activity Centers include the full array of commercial uses, residential uses, institutional uses, hotel /motel uses at a maximum density of 26 units per acre, community facilities, and other land uses as generally allowed in the Urban designation. The actual mix of the various land uses shall be determined during the rezoning process based on consideration of the factors listed below. Except as restricted below under the provision for Master Planned Activity Centers, all Mixed Use Activity Centers may be developed with any of the land uses allowed within this Subdistrict. For residential -only development, if a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is not within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict ^r Urban Coastal Fringe Subd str -iet and is not within the Coastal High Hazard Area, up to 16 residential units per gross acre may be permitted. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is within the T rfba Coastal Fringe Subd stfi .+ Coastal High Hazard Area, the eligible density shall be limited to four dwelling units per acre, exeept as allowed by density rating system. If such a project is located within the boundaries of a Mixed Use Activity Center which is within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, eligible density shall be as allowed by that Subdistrict. For a residential -only project located partially within and partially outside of an Activity Center, the density accumulated from the Activity Center portion of the project may be distributed throughout the project. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** The boundaries of Mixed Use Activity Centers have been delineated on the maps located at the end of this section as part of the Future Land Use Map Series. These map boundaries are the actual, fixed boundaries and cannot be adjusted without a comprehensive plan amendment, except as provided below for Master Planned Activity Centers. Master Planned Activity Centers Any of the five Mixed Use Activity Centers listed below may be designated as a Master Planned Activity Center, via the rezoning process. A Master Planned Activity Center is one which has a unified plan of development in the form of a Planned Unit Development, Development of Regional Impact or an area -wide Development of Regional Impact. If choosing to designate a Mixed Use Activity Center, or portion thereof, as a Master Planned Activity Center, the property DRAFT Words underlined are added; words struGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. 14 Words double underlined are added; words gh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element— CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 Pr-eperty owners within such Mixed Use Activity Centers shall be required to utilize the Master Planned Activity Center process; as provided below. # 2 US 41 and Immokalee Road # 3 Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard # 5 US 41 and Vanderbilt Beach Road # 7 Rattlesnake- Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard #14 Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway In recognition of the benefit to the public road network resulting from the coordination of planned land uses and coordinated access points to the pub lie r-O fietwo Master Planned Activity Centers are encouraged through the allowance of flexibility in the boundaries, and thus location of uses permitted within a designated Mixed Use Activity Center. The boundaries of Master Planned Activity Centers depicted on the Future Land Use Map Series are understood to be flexible and subject to modification as provided for below. However, the acreage within the reconfigured Activity Center shall not exceed that within the existing Activity Center. The actual mix of land uses shall be determined using the criteria for other Mixed Use Activity Centers. All of the following criteria must be met for a project to qualify as a Master Planned Activity Center: The applicant shall have unified control of the majority of a quadrant in a designated Activity Center. Majority of the quadrant shall be defined as at least 51% of the privately owned land within any Activity Center quadrant. 0 r • Imp.r.qw-mm 2. 1.- 2. The allowable land uses for a Master Planned Activity Center shall be the same as for other designated Activity Centers; however, a Master Planned Activity Center encompassing the majority of the property in two or more quadrants shall be afforded the flexibility to redistribute a part or all of the allocation from one quadrant to another, to the extent of the unified control. The maximum amount of commercial uses allowed at Activity Center #3 ( Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard) is 40 acres per quadrant for a total of 160 acres maximum in the entire Activity Center; the balance of the land area shall be limited to non - commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use Activity Centers. DRAFT Words underlined are added; words struck t#feugh are deleted —as recommended by staff. 15 Words double underlined are added; words are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 The maximum amount of commercial uses allowed at Activity Center #7 (Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard) is 40 acres per quadrant, except that the northeast quadrant may have a total of 59 acres, for a total of 179 acres maximum in the entire Activity Center; the balance of the land area shall be limited to non - commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use Activity Centers. With respect to the +/- 19 acres in the northeast quadrant of Activity Center #7, said acreage lying adjacent to the east of the Hammock Park Commerce Center PUD, commercial development (exclusive of the allowed "1/4 mile support medical uses ") shall be limited to a total of 185,000 square feet of the following uses: personal indoor self - storage facilities — this use shall occupy no greater than 50% of the total (185,000) building square feet; offices for various contractor/builder construction trade specialists inclusive of the offices of related professional disciplines and services that typically serve those construction businesses or otherwise assist in facilitating elements of a building and related infrastructure, including but not limited to architects, engineers, land surveyors and attorneys — these offices of related professional disciplines and services shall occupy no greater than 50% of the total (185,000) building square feet; warehouse space for various contractor/builder construction trades occupants; mortgage and land title companies; related businesses including but not limited to lumber and other building materials dealers, paint, glass, and wallpaper stores, garden supply stores — all as accessory uses only, accessory to offices for various contractor/builder construction trade specialists or accessory to warehouse space for various contractor/builder construction trades occupants; management associations of various types of buildings or provision of services to buildings /properties; and, fitness centers. The maximum amount of commercial uses allowed at Activity Center #14 (Goodlette -Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway) shall have a r is 45 acresa for eemmereial use, the balance of the land uses shall be limited to non - commercial uses as allowed in Mixed Use Activity Centers. 3. The location and configuration of all land uses within a Master Planned Activity Center shall be compatible with and related to existing site features, surrounding development, and existing natural and manmade constraints. Commercial uses shall be oriented so as to provide coordinated and functional transportation access to major roadways serving the Activity Center, and functionally related or integrated with surrounding land uses and the planned transportation network. 4. Adjacent properties within the Activity Center that are not under the unified control of the applicant shall be considered and appropriately incorporated (i.e. pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular interconnections) into the applicant's Master Plan. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stFUGk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. 16 Words double underlined are added; words doable are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 II. AGRICULTURAL/RURAL DESIGNATION [No change to text — provided for context, page 66] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** A. Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District [No change to text — provided for context, page 67] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** B. Rural Fringe Mixed Use District [No change to text — provided for context, page 69] The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is identified on Future Land Use Map. This District consists of approximately 93,600 acres, or 7% of Collier County's total land area. Significant portions of this District are adjacent to the Urban area or to the semi - rural, rapidly developing, large -lot North Golden Gate Estates platted lands. Agricultural land uses within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District do not represent a significant portion of the County's active agricultural lands. As of the date of adoption of this Plan Amendment, the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District consists of more than 5,550 tax parcels, and includes at least 3,835 separate and distinct property owners. Alternative land use strategies have been developed for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, in part, to consider these existing conditions. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides a transition between the Urban and Estates Designated lands and between the Urban and Agricultural /Rural and Conservation designated lands farther to the east. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District employs a balanced approach, including both regulations and incentives, to protect natural resources and private property rights, providing for large areas of open space, and allowing, in designated areas, appropriate types, density and intensity of development. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District allows for a mixture of urban and rural levels of service, including limited extension of central water and sewer, schools, recreational facilities, commercial uses and essential services deemed necessary to serve the residents of the District. In order to preserve existing natural resources, including habitat for listed species, to retain a rural, pastoral, or park -like appearance from the major public rights - of -way within this area, and to protect private property rights, the following innovative planning and development techniques are required and/or encouraged within the District. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** 1. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), and Sending, Neutral, and Receiving Designations: [No change to text — provided for context, page 69] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stfuGk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. 17 Words double underlined are added; words �-1, H.. _-.1. are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element- CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 Q Sending Lands: Sending Lands are those lands that have the highest degree of environmental value and sensitivity and generally include significant wetlands, uplands, and habitat for listed species. [No change to text — provided for context, page 76] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** 7. Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are limited to the following: [No change to text — provided for context, page 77] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** [Revised text, pages 77 -78] f) Essential Services necessary to serve permitted uses identified in Section 5-.a) 7.a through Vie-) 7.e) such as ... * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** 8. Conditional Uses: [Revised text, page 78] a) The following uses are conditionally permitted subject to approval through a public hearing process: (1) Essential services not identified above in 4f) 7.f). Within one year, Collier County will review essential services currently allowed in the Land Development Code and will define those uses intended to be conditionally permitted in Sending designated lands. During this one -year period or if necessary until a comprehensive plan amendment identifying conditionally permitted essential services, no conditional uses for essential services within Sending designated lands shall be approved. (2) Public facilities, including solid waste and resource recovery facilities, and public vehicle and equipment storage and repair facilities, shall be permitted within Section 25, Township 49S, Range 26E, on lands adjacent to the existing County landfill. This shall not be interpreted to allow for the expansion of the landfill into Section 25 for the purpose of solid waste disposal. (3) Commercial uses accessory to permitted uses ^.a), ^.e) an 4-.d) 7.a), 7.c and), such as retail sales of produce accessory to farming, or a restaurant accessory to a park or preserve, so long as restrictions or limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory, subordinate use. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** DRAFT Words underlined are added; words sttusk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. 18 Words double underlined are added; words de-ble strunk thro-ah are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 4. Exemptions from the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Development Standard [Revised text, page 84] The requirements, limitations and allowances of this District shall not apply to, affect or limit the continuation of existing uses. Existing uses shall include: those uses for which all required permits were issued prior to June 19, 2002; or projects for which a Conditional use or- Rezone pew has been approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002; or, projects for which a Rezone petition has been approved by the County prior to June 19, 2002 — inclusive of all lands not zoned A, Rural Agricultural; or, land use petitions for which a completed application has been submitted prior to June 19, 2002. The continuation of existing uses shall include on- site expansions of those uses if such expansions are consistent with or clearly ancillary to the existing uses. Hereafter, such previously approved developments shall be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Objectives and Policies and for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, and they may be built out in accordance with their previously approved plans. Changes to these previous approvals shall also be deemed to be consistent with the Plan's Goals, Policies and Objectives for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District as long as they do not result in an increase in development density or intensity. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** V. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES [No change to text — provided for context, page 87] * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** H. Coastal High Hazard Area: [Revised text, page 120] Policy 12.2.5 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) defines the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA). The CHHA boundary is eg nerally depicted on the Future Land Use Map and is more precisely shown in the Future Land Use Map series; all lands lying seaward of that boundary are within the CHHA. New rezones to permit mobile home development shall not be allowed within the CHHA. The Capital Improvement Element and Conservation and Coastal Management Element both contain policies pertaining to the expenditure of public funds for public facilities within the CHHA. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Future Land Use Map Series [Revised text, final page of FLUE text] Add new Future Land Use Map Series map: Future Land Use Map Activity Center Index Map * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Man DRAFT Words underlined are added; words stn♦sk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. 19 Words double underlined are added; words are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Future Land Use Element — CCPC Transmittal Draft 2 -21 -12 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Future Land Use Map and Map Series [Revised and new maps, following FLUE text] a. Amend countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to: 1. Delete Traffic Congestion Area boundary (correlates to changes in Density Rating System) 2. Revise Coastal High Hazard Area boundary (correlates to changes in Policy 12.2.5 of Conservation and Coastal Management Element and changes in Density Rating System) b. Create new Coastal High Hazard Area Map depicting revised Coastal High Hazard Area boundary — generalized boundary to correlate with that depicted on countywide FLUM and more precise boundary (correlates to changes in Policy 12.2.5 of Conservation and Coastal Management Element, revised CHHA boundary on countywide FLUM, and changes in Density Rating System) C. Create new Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map depicting revised Coastal High Hazard Area boundary — generalized boundary to correlate with that depicted on countywide FLUM and more precise boundary — and the now existing (to become former) CHHA boundary for comparison purposes (correlates to changes in Policies 6.1.1 and 12.2.5 of Conservation and Coastal Management Element and revised CHHA boundary on countywide FLUM) EAR -based amendments — CCPC Transmittal Consent doc - FLUE 2 -21 -12 G: \CDES Planning Services \Comprehensive\David\2011 EAR - dw \GMPAs 2011 EAR -based dw/2 -21 -12 DRAFT Words underlined are added; words s#uskthrough are deleted — as recommended by staff. 20 Words double underlined are added; words � are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Goal, Objectives and Policies Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES [Revised text, page 4] GOAL 1: [Revised text, page 4] TO GUIDE LAND USE AND PUBLIC FACILITY DECISION MAKING Aq4ILE BALANC AND TO BALANCE THE NEED TO PROVIDE BASIC SERVICES WITH NATURAL RESOURCE CONCERNS THROUGH A WELL PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH ENSURE THE HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, AND QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THE LOCAL RESIDENTS. OBJECTIVE 1.1: [Restructured to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 4] Unless ethefwise pefmitted in this Master- Plan, new or- revised ttses of land shall be eensisten with designations outlined on the Golden Gate Area Futufe Land Use Map. The Golden Gate Area Futufe Land Use Map and eempanion Futufe Land Use Designations, Distfiets,—apA Subdistfiets shall be binding on all development efdefs effeetive with the adoption of this Maste Plan. Standards and pefmitted uses for- Golden Gate Area Fulufe Land Use Distfiets and Subdistr-iets afo identified in the Land Use Designation Deser-iption Seetion of this Element. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Develop new or revised uses of land shall be consistent with designations outlined on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and provisions found in the Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element. Policy 1.1.0.1: The Policies under the above Objective shall identify the Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts for the Golden Gate Area. Policy 1.1.0.2: The Land Use Designation Description Section of this Element shall provide the standards and permitted uses for Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts. Policy 1.1.0.3: The Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map and companion Future Land Use Designations, Districts, and Subdistricts shall be binding on all development orders unless otherwise permitted in this Master Plan effective with the adoption of this Master Plan. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words 6tfusk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words n.1h are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 1 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 OBJECTIVE 1.3: [Restructured to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 6] The County shall eenti tie to p Protect and preserve the valuable natural resources within the Golden Gate area. in aeeer-danee ahe Objectives and Daheies eentained within , Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier- GautAy Conser-vation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3.0.1: The County shall protect and preserve natural resources within the Golden Gate area in accordance with the Objectives and Policies contained within Goals 6 and 7 of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 1.4: [Restructured to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 6] Thfetigh the enfor-eement of the Land Development Code and the housing and btfilding eedes-, Collier- Cetmt y shall eonfi ue to p Provide a living environment within the Golden Gate Area, which is aesthetically acceptable and enes protects the quality of life. Policy 1.4.0.1: [Revised text, page 6] Collier County shall provide a living environment that is aesthetically acceptable and enhanees protects the quality of life through the enforcement of the Land Development Code and trn applicable codes and laws. Policy 1.4.1: [Revised text, page 6] The County's Code Enforcement Board shall strictly enforce the Land Development Code and other applicable codes and laws to control the illegal storage of machinery, vehicles and junk, and the illegal operation of commercial activities within the Golden Gate Area. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** GOAL 2: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal", revised text, page 7] COUNTY RECOGNIZES THAT • • . GOLDEN GATE EST-i�ES PROJECT (SGGE), AS AkRT OF T14E FEDERAL SAVE Ota EVERGLADES PROGRjkM, -- ,��... TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE AREA WHICH LIES SOUTH OF INTERSTATE 75 (ALLIGATOR ALLEY) TO US 41 (EAST TRAIL) IS AN AREA OF SPECIAL ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY AND IS BIOLOGICALLY AND HYDROLOGICALLY IMPORTANT THROUGH PARTICIPATION IN THE PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AS PART OF THE FEDERAL SAVE OUR EVERGLADES PROGRAM. BASED UPON SUCH CONDITIONS, THE STATE HAS ACQUIRED OWNERSHIP OF ALL LANDS Words underlined are added; words stFUGk thrsugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words d l�� are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 WITHIN THE SOUTHERN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES (SGGE) PICAYUNE STRAND RESTORATION PROJECT AREA. [Deleted text, page 71 [Deleted text, page 7] eeMr:rss: PoKey 2.1.-2-- . [Deleted text, page 7] expanded into SGGE Policy 2.13--. [Deleted text, page 7] Poliey 2.1.4--. [Deleted text, page 7] The County ter- 28 -25, ., "Boundary for- the Big G<,pfess Area of Cr-ifieal State Gefieefn" to these Geldefi Ga4e Estates units leeated within the Big OBjECTIVE 2.2: [Deleted text, page 7] Poliey 2.2.4: [Deleted text, page 8] The County shall dir-eet ifiquiries and fnake infefmafiefi available regarding options fef the s , Btweau ems- Aden's - designee, as pr-evided by DE Poliey 2.2.-2-- . [Deleted text, page 81 Collier- Gount-y shall eentinue to implefneat a systefn for- r- _34eations for- develepmeiit Words underlined are added; words stfask-thmugb are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dou-bles thro-wh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan — CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 . . . • GOAL 3: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 9] TO PROVIDE FOR BASIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 3.1: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 9] mMeet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates - Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers within Golden Gate Estates shall. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** GOAL 4: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 710] r�(lcvLLIER G0tP4T -Y PLArA�tYAT�'� -EFFORTS Agi�n1N GOLDEN GATE CITY S14 ALL TLL SE TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY THAT PROVIDES FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF BOTH THE LOCAL RESIDENTS AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. OBJECTIVE 4.1: [Restructured to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 10] Development and r-edevelepment within Golden Gate City shall feetts an the pr-ovisie r-esidefAial and eommer-eial land uses that meets the needs of the stiffounding afea. Words underlined are added; words StFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words double s4wk thFeugh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 ._. . . . • GOAL 3: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 9] TO PROVIDE FOR BASIC COMMERCIAL SERVICES FOR PURPOSES OF SERVING THE RURAL NEEDS OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES RESIDENTS, SHORTENING VEHICULAR TRIPS, AND PRESERVING RURAL CHARACTER. OBJECTIVE 3.1: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 9] mMeet the locational and rural design criteria contained within the Estates Designation, Estates - Mixed Use District, Neighborhood Center Subdistrict of this Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, of the Collier County Growth Management Plan when considering the placement and designation of Neighborhood Centers within Golden Gate Estates shall. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** GOAL 4: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 710] r�(lcvLLIER G0tP4T -Y PLArA�tYAT�'� -EFFORTS Agi�n1N GOLDEN GATE CITY S14 ALL TLL SE TO PRESERVE AND ENHANCE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL LAND USES WITHIN GOLDEN GATE CITY THAT PROVIDES FOR THE BASIC NEEDS OF BOTH THE LOCAL RESIDENTS AND THE RESIDENTS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. OBJECTIVE 4.1: [Restructured to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 10] Development and r-edevelepment within Golden Gate City shall feetts an the pr-ovisie r-esidefAial and eommer-eial land uses that meets the needs of the stiffounding afea. Words underlined are added; words StFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words double s4wk thFeugh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 4 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan — CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Provide for residential and commercial land uses that meet the needs of the surrounding area in the development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City. Policy 4.0.1: Development and redevelopment within Golden Gate City shall be guided by the residential and commercial needs of the surrounding area_ Policy 4.1.1: [Revised text, page 10] By2006, Collier County shall develop an implementation schedule for the creation of a community - planning program for Golden Gate City. The implementation schedule shall take into consideration the following issues: a) Affordable housing based upon home ownership; b) Commercial re- vitalization, to include: i. Sidewalks ii. Traffic calming measures iii. Improved street lighting; c) Neighborhood parks, open space and recreational centers; d) Crime reduction; e) Consistent enforcement of land development regulations; and, f) Improved lighting for streets and parking areas. Policy 4.1.2: [Revised text, page 10] By 2006, Collier County shall begin to examine, by holding community meetings, the feasibility of establishing neighborhood -based planning programs within Golden Gate City that focus on the unique or distinct features of the different portions of the community. While focusing on distinct areas within the community, such neighborhood planning efforts as may be established shall not neglect Golden Gate City as a whole. Policy 4.1.3: [Revised text, page 10] By Collier County shall examine the feasibility of crafting land development regulations specific to the Golden Gate City community. Such regulations shall focus on the unique circumstances of this community. GOAL 5: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 11 ] FUTURE Gv OWT-14 AND DEVELOPMENT *AT44IN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES Aq! TO BALANCE THE DESIRE BY RESIDENTS FOR URBAN AMENITIES WITHIN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES WITH THE PRESERVATION OF THE AREA'S RURAL CHARACTER, AS DEFINED BY WOODED LOTS, THE KEEPING OF LIVESTOCK, THE ABILITY TO GROW CROPS, WILDLIFE ACTIVITY, LOW - DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND LIMITATIONS ON COMMERCIAL AND CONDITIONAL USES. Words underlined are added; words struck through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 OBJECTIVE 5.1: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 11] By 2006, the Geld Development p Provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 5.2: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 11] Balance the provision of public infrastructure shall be bala^° °a with the need to preserve the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 5.2.2: [Revised text, page 12] The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department shall create a public network of greenway corridors within Golden Gate Estates that interconnects public lands and permanently protected green space. The firs* segnient of g shall be in plaee by 2006 The greenway network shall consist of interconnected trails and paths which allow people to move about the Estates Area by means other than motorized vehicles. All greenways shall be constructed within existing or future public rights -of -way. In creating the greenway network, the County shall not employ eminent domain proceedings. Policy 5.2.3: [Revised text, page 12] Recognizing the existing residential nature of the land uses surrounding the planned I -75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway, as well as the restrictions on conditional uses of the Conditional Uses Subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, there shall be no further commercial zoning for properties abutting Golden Gate Parkway between Livingston Road and Santa Barbara Boulevard. No new commercial uses shall be permitted on properties abutting streets accessing Golden Gate Parkway within the above - defined segment. This policy shall not apply to that existing portion of the Golden Gate Estates Commercial Infill Subdistrict, which is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Santa Barbara Boulevard. OBJECTIVE 5.3: [Restructured to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 12] By 2006, the Collier- County Land Development Code shall be amended, as neeessaiFyL, so as te-p Provide for the protection of the rural character of Golden Gate Estates. Policy 5.3.0.1: These Rural character protection provisions shall provide for the preservation of such rural amenities as, but not limited to, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, and low- density residential development. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stFUGk thFaugb are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words d-A-u-ble sAFHA ough are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 6 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan — CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 5.3.2: [Revised text, page 12] The Land Development Code shall continue to allow and further encourage the preservation of native vegetation and wildlife indigenous to the Estates Area. GOAL 6: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 13] TO PROVIDE FOR A SAFE AND EFFICIENT COUNTY AND LOCAL ROADWAY NETWORK, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME SEEKING TO PRESERVE THE RURAL CHARACTER OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IN FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE GOLDEN GATE AREA ALL. OBJECTIVE 6.1: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 13] Increase the number of route alternatives for traffic moving through the Golden Gate Area in both east -west and north -south directions, consistent with neighborhood traffic safety considerations, and consistent with the preservation of the area's rural character. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 6.1.2: [Revised text, page 13] Collier County shall continue to coordinate with the Florida Department of Transportation to initiate implement a study of a potential interchange in the vicinity of I -75 and Everglades Boulevard. OBJECTIVE 6.2: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 13] Increase linkages within the local road system for the purposes of limiting traffic on arterials and major collectors within Golden Gate Estates, shortening vehicular trips, and increasing overall road system capacity, the County will tive y work to. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 6.3: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 13] Ali ef County shat e Coordinate with local emergency services officials in planning and constructing road improvements within Golden Gate Estates and Golden Gate City to ensure that the access needs of fire department, police and emergency management personnel and vehicles are met. Policy 6.3.1: [Revised text, page 14] Be,t;....:ng in 2005 t The Collier County Transportation Planning DepaFtment Division shall hold at least one annual public meeting with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers and the local civic association in order to ensure that emergency needs are addressed during the acquisition of right -of -way for design and construction of road improvements. Words underlined are added; words str u^L thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words e stm-1. 11.€® are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 7 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 6.3.2: [Revised text, page 14] Beginning in 2005, t The Collier County Transportation Planning Depaftfnent Division shall continue to coordinate with Golden Gate Area emergency services providers to prioritize necessary road improvements related to emergency evacuation needs. GOAL 7: [Rephrased to improve format as a "goal ", revised text, page 15] 3A T T BE TO PROTECTED THE LIVES AND PROPERTY OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE GREATER GOLDEN GATE AREA, AS WELL AS THE HEALTH OF THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT, THROUGH THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT PREPARE FOR, MITIGATE, AND RESPOND TO, NATURAL AND MANMADE DISASTERS. OBJECTIVE 7.1: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 15] Maintain and implement public information programs through the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, Collier County Sheriff's Department, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate agencies, will eenfif m ° +^ to inform residents and visitors of the Greater Golden Gate Area regarding the means to prevent, prepare for, and cope with, disaster situations. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 7.1.3: [Revised text, page 15] By AA5,t The Collier County r^mn+unit , Development and Envir-^rmenta Sen4e°s- Land Development Services Department of the Growth Management Division shall evaluate the Land Development Code for Golden Gate Estates and shall eliminate any requirements that are found to be inconsistent with acceptable fire prevention standards. This evaluation process shall be coordinated with the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District and the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 7.2: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 15] Ensure that the needs of these entities all applicable emergency services providers to are included and shall be coordinated with in the overall public project design for capital improvement projects within the Golden Gate Area. Policy 7.2.1: [Revised text, page 15] Preparation of Collier County's annual Schedule of Capital Improvements for projects within the Golden Gate Area shall be coordinated with planners, or the agents or representatives with planning responsibilities, from the Fire Districts, public and private utilities, Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department to ensure that public project designs are consistent with the needs of these agencies. Words underlined are added; words sffusiFthFough are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 8 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Policy 7.2.2: [Revised text, page 16] Planners, or the agents or representatives with planning responsibilities, from the Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Department and the Collier County Sheriff's Department sha4 will receive copies of pre - construction plans for capital improvement projects in the Golden Gate Area and shall will be invited to review and comment on plans for the public projects. OBJECTIVE 7.3: [Rephrased to improve format as an "objective ", revised text, page 16] While the County T, speAati ,,, Planning Depat4ment is in r to of a Develop strategies through the Count Growth Management Division — Planning and Regulation for the enhancement of roadway interconnection within Golden Gate City and the Estates Area, including interim measures to assure interconnection shall be deyele" °a. Policy 7.3.1: [Revised text, page 16] By 2006,1 The Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, the Collier County Transportation Division, Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District, and other appropriate Federal, State or local agencies, shall begin establishing one or more of the following routes for emergency evacuation purposes: a. An I -75 Interchange eA in the vicinity of Everglades Boulevard. b. Improved emergency access from Everglades Boulevard to I -75. c. Construction of a north -south bridge on 23rd Street, SW, between White Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 7.3.4: [Revised text, page 16] Beginning in 2006, County -owned property within Golden Gate Estates shall be subject to an active, on -going management plan to reduce the damage caused by wildfires originating from County -owned properties. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words struGk-through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dowMe st-us", ag are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 9 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Land Use Designation Description Section Estates - Mixed Use District: Conditional Uses Subdistrict [Revised text, pages 31 - 34] 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION A. Estates - Mixed Use District 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a) Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions: Those Essential Services Conditional Uses, as identified within Section 2.01.03 G. of the Collier County Land Development Code, may be allowed anywhere within the Estates Zoning District, except as prohibited in certain Neighborhood Centers, and are defined as: • electric or gas generating plants, • effluent tanks, • major re -pump stations, • sewage treatment plants, including percolation ponds, • hospitals and hospices, • water aeration or treatment plants, • governmental facilities (except for those Permitted Uses identified in Section 2.01.03 of the Land Development Code), • public water supply acquisition, withdrawal, or extraction facilities, and • public safety service facilities, and other similar facilities. Provision Assessment: This provision, in varying iterations, has existed in the GGAMP since its adoption in 1991 and remains appropriate. However, the LDC reference and/or list of uses may not encompass all essential services, e.g. communication towers which are listed in LDC Sec. 2.01.03 G, Sec. 5.05.09, and in various zoning districts. Additionally, the reference to the Estates zoning district fails to capture all zoning districts found in the Golden Gate Estates area, e.g. P, Public Use zoning at Max Hasse Park. The County recommends revising the LDC reference and/or list of essential services uses to encompass all essential services uses relevant to the Golden Gate Estates area, and expanding the referenced zoning district listed to encompass all relevant zoning districts in Golden Gate Estates and/or adding reference to the Estates Designation. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words stFUsk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words dowbis stmekthFabigh are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 10 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 Land Use Designation Description Section Estates - Commercial District: Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict [Revised text, pages 38 - 40] 2. ESTATES DESIGNATION B. Estates - Commercial District 3. Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Recognizing the unique development pattern and characteristics of surrounding land uses, the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict has been designated on the Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map. The Subdistrict is comprised of the following properties: Tract 71, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23; and the East 165 feet of Tract 54, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23. See Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map. a) The Criteria for the Subdistrict are as follows: • All commercial development is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. • Projects directly abutting Estates zoned property shall provide, at a minimum, a 75 -foot buffer of retained native vegetation in which no parking or water management uses are permitted; except that, when abutting conditional uses no such buffer is required. • Shared parking shall be required with adjoining developments whenever possible. b) Limitation of Uses - Uses shall be limited to the following: • Automobile Service Station; • Barber & Beauty Shops; • Convenience Stores; • Drug Stores; • Food Markets; • Hardware Stores; • Laundries - Self Service Only; • Post Offices and Professional Offices; • Repair Shops - Radio, TV, Small Appliances and Shoes; • Restaurants, including fast food restaurants but not drive -in restaurants • Shopping Center; • Veterinary Clinics with no outside kenneling. Provision Assessment: The specific list of uses in this subdistrict has existed in the GGAMP since its adoption in 1991 and was taken from a PUD approved prior to 1991. On April 14, 2009, the BCC approved an Appeal of a Zoning Verification Letter (Resolution 2009 -99) having the effect of allowing all uses of the C -2 zoning district in the LDC at that time, under the term "shopping center." Words underlined are added; words struGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words d®au are deleted - as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 11 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Golden Gate Area Master Plan - CCPC Transmittal Draft 3 -1 -12 The County recommends replacing the term "shopping center" with reference to C -2 uses (perhaps, "All Permitted Uses of the C -2, Convenience Commercial, zoning district in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance 04 -41, as amended, as of April 14, 2009 "). EAR -GGAMP — CCPC Transmittal DRAFT updated to February 20, 2012 — 5:10 PM G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive12011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTSICCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendments\CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda Materials \ELEMENTS for March 1 CCPCIEAR -based Amendments —CCPC Transmittal— GGAMP- 2.docx CS Words underlined are added; words stntGk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words de-ble stp, -eugh are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 12 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Economic Element - CCPC Transmittal 3 -1 -12 Goal, Objectives and Policies Economic Element GOAL: [No change to text, page 2] COLLIER COUNTY WILL ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN A DIVERSIFIED AND STABLE ECONOMY BY PROVIDING A POSITIVE BUSINESS CLIMATE THAT ASSURES MAXIMUM EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES WHILE MAINTAINING A HIGH QUALITY OF LIFE. OBJECTIVE 1 (The Conservation and Enhancement of Natural, Cultural and Social Resources): [Revised text, page 2] Collier County will encourage the conservation and enhancement of those natural, cultural, and social resources that are integral represent the f ,.„a.,*;,,,, of to maintaining and expanding that portion of the County's economy zh �� which largely relies on seasonal residents and short term visitors and retired residents, r- particularly the recreation, hospitality and tourism industries t or-iefAed eeenemy, in order to place the County in a an advantageous eampetitive position to enable the retain efitio and expand sien 0 these and other similar or related businesses eppeftunitiels. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** textbreak *** *** * * * ** *** Policy 1.2: [Revised text, page 2] Collier County will support the opportunity for development and establishment of hospitals, nursing homes and additional medical related research and manufacturing facilities in order to promote a continuum of care to enhance the quality of life throughout the County. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** textbreak *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 2 (Expanding and Enhancing the Hospitality and Tourism Industry): [Revised text, page 3] Collier County will support programs that are designed to expand and enhance the tourism industry. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** textbreak *** *** *** *** *** OBJECTIVE 3 (New and Existing Industries): [No change to text, page 3] Collier County will support programs which are designed to promote and encourage the recruitment of new industry as well as the expansion and retention of existing industries in order to diversify the County's economic base. *** * ** * ** * ** * ** textbreak *** *** *** *** *** Words underlined are added; words struGk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words d-e-uh-le s& are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 1 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Economic Element - CCPC Transmittal 3 -1 -12 Policy 3.3: [Revised text, page 3] Collier County will suppert the prepare ate 4-an annual report on the progress of economic development and diversification, in the County, specifically as it relates to achieving the objectives set forth in the five -year economic development plan referenced in Policy 3.1 * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 3.8: [Revised text, page 4] Collier County, in coordination with appropriate entities, will continue programs that encourage and assist in the location of new companies that build on, but not limited to the traditional economic base of Tourism. Retail Trade. Construction and the arowina areas of Health and Life Sciences and Computer Software and Services. Poliey 3.9-- [Deleted policy, page 4] Collier- Count), will suppeFt the pr-epar-ation of an annual r-epoft on the pr-ogq-7ess of existing Policy 3.9 470: [Renumbered policy, page 4] Policy 3.10 -1: [Renumbered policy, page 4] Policy 3.112: [Renumbered policy, page 4] Policy 3.12 2: [Renumbered policy, page 4] [Relocated policy, page 4] Collier- County has adopted a eempr-ehensive pr-egi-7affl of . eentives that are designed to att-faet new businesses and develop the leeal we4cfer-ee for- stieh businesses. These ineentives ;„ Policy 3.13 5: Policy 3.14 g: [Renumbered policy, page 5] [Renumbered policy, page 5] Policy 3.15: [New policy, page 5] Collier County will obtain and monitor the County's unemployment rate from the United States Department of Labor. Words underlined are added; words GtFUGk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words double MwGk thFough are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 �. I ORM K"'MIN. Policy 3.13 5: Policy 3.14 g: [Renumbered policy, page 5] [Renumbered policy, page 5] Policy 3.15: [New policy, page 5] Collier County will obtain and monitor the County's unemployment rate from the United States Department of Labor. Words underlined are added; words GtFUGk thmugh are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words double MwGk thFough are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT 2 Consent Agenda Exhibit "A" EAR -based GMP Amendments Economic Element - CCPC Transmittal 3 -1 -12 OBJECTIVE 4: (Nonprofit and Civic Organizations and Local Groups/Programs): [Revised text, page 5] Recognizing the significant economic and social benefits and the overall quality place attributable in large part to the vast array of nonprofit organizations, civic and community associations, and other local groups and programs in Collier County and in the southwest Florida region, the County, where appropriate, will support the community involvement efforts and economic development goals of such organizations, associations, groups and programs. , Pohey-4� [Deleted policy, page 5] Pelirey 4:2: [Deleted policy, page 5] Collier- Collier- Geunty will -support — the - eeenofnie development goals and e &fts of eou erganizations. Peke [Deleted policy, page 5] Policy 4.1 [New policy, page 5] Collier County will support, where appropriate, the economic development; initiatives of regional nonprofit organizations, goals and efforts of countywide organizations and efforts of localized organizations. OBJECTIVE 5 (Expansion and Development of Educational Facilities and Programs): [No change to text, page 5] Collier County will encourage the expansion and development of educational facilities and programs that complement economic development and diversification. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 6 (Development Regulations): [No change to text, page 5] Collier County will maintain a system of development regulations that will promote the accomplishment of the goals, objectives, and policies of this Element. EAR -EE — CCPC Workshop Draft 9 -16 -11 I Transmittal FINAL DRAFT updated to February 21, 2012 G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive12011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTSICCPC transmittal - EAR -based GMP amendments\CCPC Transmittal March 1 Consent Agenda MaterialslELEMENTS for March 1 CCPCIEconomic- Element -CCPC- consent- 2- 17- 12.docx MB/CS Words underlined are added; words stfusk through are deleted — as recommended by staff. Words double underlined are added; words doabie-L- thco-ah are deleted — as recommended by CCPC. FINAL DRAFT EAR -based GMP Amendments Public School Facilities Element — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 Goals, Objectives and Policies Public Schools Facilities Element (PSFE) GOAL: [Goal provided for contextual purposes only; no change proposed, page 3] TO PROVIDE FOR COORDINATED PLANNING BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND TO ESTABLISH A SCHOOL CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM TO ENSURE ADEQUATE SCHOOL CAPACITY IS AVAILABLE TO ACCOMMODATE ENROLLMENT DEMAND AS IDENTIFIED IN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT'S FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE FIVE -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 2: [Objective provided for contextual purposes only; no change proposed, page 3] The County, in cooperation with the School District, shall ensure a school concurrency evaluation is performed on all non - exempt residential development to verify that new students can be accommodated within the adopted level of service standard established for each school type as measured within a CSA. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Policy 2.3 [Deleted text, pages 5 & 6] The County, through its land development regulations, and in conjunction with the School District, shall establish a school concurrency review process for all residential development projects that are not exempt under Policy 2.2 of this Element. The following are the minimum review process requirements for all non - exempt residential development: A. Submittal of a residential development application including a School Impact Analysis (SIA) to the County for sufficiency review. B. Determination of completeness by the County. If deemed complete, the County shall transmit the application, including the SIA, to the School District for review. C. Review of the application, by the School District, for available capacity, and issuance of a School Capacity Availability Determination Letter (SCADL) within 20 days after receipt of a complete application from the County. The School District shall identify the following in the SCADL: 1. Available capacity within the affected CSA. Words underlined are added; words stFUGk through are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words �# are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT EAR -based GMP Amendments Public School Facilities Element — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 2. If capacity is not available within the affected CSA, the available capacity within one or more of the adjacent CSAs. (If the affected CSA does not contain a particular school type (elementary, middle, high), the adjacent CSAs shall be evaluated for available capacity.) 3. If capacity is not available in the adjacent CSAs, the School District shall indicate that the development is not in compliance with the adopted LOSS and offer the applicant the opportunity to negotiate a mitigation plan within a 90 day period. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** [Deleted text, page 6] .. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** OBJECTIVE 3: [Objective provided for contextual purposes only; no change proposed, page 7] The County and the School District will: coordinate the location of public schools with the Future Land Use Map and map series to ensure that existing and proposed school facilities are located consistent with existing and proposed residential areas they serve and are proximate to appropriate existing and future land uses, and serve as community focal points; coordinate the location of public school facilities relative to the location of other public facilities such as parks, libraries and community centers to the extent possible; coordinate existing and planned public school facilities with the plans for supporting infrastructure; establish a monitoring group; and address coordination on emergency preparedness issues. * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** text break * ** * ** * ** * ** * ** Words underlined are added; words StF �thFougrt are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT 2 EAR -based GMP Amendments Public School Facilities Element — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 2 -21 -12 Policy 3.6: [Revised text, page 8] The County, in eonj netio .A4t , and the School District; shall collaborate with their jointly appointed Citizen Advisory Group establish a Citizen Advisory Gfe" (GAG) G) to monitor planning and school concurrency in Gollier County. EAR -PSFE — CCPC Transmittal Hearing 3 -1 -12 G:ICDES Planning Services\Comprehensive12011 EAR -BASED GMP AMENDMENTSIElements\PSFE -MM Words underlined are added; words dough are deleted - as recommended by staff Words double underlined are added; words are deleted - as recommended by CCPC FINAL DRAFT AGENDA ITEM 8 -G This item is being continued to the March 15, 2012 CCPC meeting. VA- PL2011 -1410: Wahl Variance A Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, relating to Petition Number VA- PL201 1 0001 41 0, for a variance from Land Development Code Section 5.03.06.E.5 to permit a reduced side yard (riparian) setback from 15 feet to 9.3 feet on the eastern boundary of the property located at 8 Pelican Street West, Isles of Capri in Section 5, Township 52 South, Range 26 East in Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner] AGENDA ITEM 8 -H This item is being continued to the March 15, 2012 CCPC meeting. BDE- PL201 1 0001 409 A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to Petition Number BDE- PL201 1 0001 409 for a 34.6 foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 foot limit provided in Section 5.03.06 of the Collier County Land Development Code to allow for a 54.6 foot boat dock facility in an RSF -4 zone on property hereinafter described in Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Michael Sawyer, Project Manager] AGENDA ITEM 9 -A Refer to Item 8F, this item is being heard under "Advertised Public Hearing as Agenda item 8F, then under Consent Agenda as Agenda item 9A. A Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing 2011 Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) Based Amendments to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89 -05, as amended, specifically amending the Capital Improvement Element, Transportation Element, Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element, Potable Water Sub - Element, Drainage Sub - Element, Solid Waste Sub - Element, and Natural Groundwater Aquifer Recharge Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element, Housing Element, Recreation & Open Space Element, Conservation and Coastal Management Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element, Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series, Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element, Economic Element, and Public Schools Facilities Element, and furthermore recommending Transmittal of these amendments to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. [Coordinator: Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner]