The URL can be used to link to this page

BCC Minutes 05/12/1992 R Naples, Florida, May 12, 1992 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners tn and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REG~ SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Michael J. Volpe VICE-CHAIRMAN: Richard S. Shanahan Burr L. Saunders Max A. Hasse, 3r. Patricia A. Goodnight ALSO PRESENT: Jim Giles, Clerk of Courts; 3ohn Yonkosky, Finance Director; Debby Farris, Ellie Hoffman, Annette Guevin and Kathy Meyers, Deputy Clerks; Nell Dorrtll, County Manager; Jennifer Edwards, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; Brenda Wilson, David Weigel, and MarJorie Student, Assistant County Attorneys; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Barbara Cacchione; Wayne Arnold, Chahran Badamtchian, Michelle Edwards, Ray Bellows, Bob Lord, David Weeks, and Elly Soto, Planners; Fred Bloetscher, Assistant Utilities Administrator; Russ Muller, Engineer; Greg Mihalic, Affordable Housing Director; Dave Pettrow, Development Services Director; Ed Kant, Transportation Projects Manager; Sheriff Don Hunter; Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the Board; and Deputy Byron Tomlinson, Sheriff's Office. Page Hay ~2, ~992 WITH CHANGES Commissioner Hues ~oved, seconded by Co~aissloner Goo~night and carried unanimously, that the agenda be approved with the changes detailed on the Agenda Chugs Sheet ~d ~ith the follo~ing additional C~: X. ~ition: Itea 10(A) - ~ re~eat regarding ~ach access ~king. 2. Continu~ to 5/26 ~eeting -Itea 16(X)(2), Reco~endation to ~r~ a Re~olutton ~en the ~ard of Cowry Co~t~elonere ~ United Telephone Co~y of Florida. ~rin~ the discussion regardin~ continuation of Item 13(B) (~) Attorney ~dley Goodlette objected to the continuation while Attorney George Varnadoe supported the continuation and in~roduced a copy of the Order in Case No. 91-2998-CA-O1-WLB scheduling the foreclosure eale on May 28th as well as copies of letters to Kenneth Cuyler and Netl Dorrtll. Page 2 May 12, 1992 CO~r~AOENDA - APPROVED AND/ORADOPTED The motion for approval of the Consent Agenda is noted under Item Ite~ ,4 MI]~UT~ OF BOARD OF COUNTY COM)~ISSI0~RS R~GULAR M~ETING OF JANUARY 7, 1992, CIT~/COU~fY JOINT WORKSHOP OF JANUARY ~3, 1992, AND REGULAR ~TING OF JANUARY ~4, ~992 - APPROVED AS PRESENTED Co~tsmioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Co~mtssioner Hasse and carried unanimously, to approve as presented the Minutes of the Board of Coun~ Cow~issioners Regular Meetings of 1/?/92 and 1/14/92 as well a~ the Ci%~/County Joint Workshop of 1/13/92. PRESENTATION TO BCC BY THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION FOR THEIR WORK IN PREVENTING SMOKING WITHIN THE COUNTY OFFICES - PRESENTED Representatives of the American Heart Association, including Stanley Hole, Chairman of the Board, presented a plaque to Chairman Volpe for the Board of County Commissioners' action in preventing smoking within County offices. EMPLO~ SERV/CI AMARDS - PRESENTED Commissioner Shanahan congratulated the following employees and presented them with Employee Service Awards: Gail M. Wilver, Facilities Mgmt. - 15 years Felix H. Ramos, Road and Bridge - 5 years PROCLAMATIOI DESIGNATIN~ NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK MAY 17-23, 1992 After reading and presenting the Proclamation to Transportation Services Administrator Archibald, Conisstoner Hasse moved, seconded b~ C~immioner Goodntght and carried unanimously, that the Pro~l~tion Demtguating May 17-23 1992 as National Public Works Week b~ ~Sovt~d. Page 3 Nay 12, 1992 Zt~m~2 ~~IoN D~SIGN&T~RG CO~R COUNTY LAH ~RFORC]9~:I~f M~MO~I&L D&¥ 12, 1992, ARD C0~I~ COITRTY L&~ ~RFORC~MERT M~MORZAL W~E~ MAY 11-15, 1992 - ADOPTED After reading and presenting the Proclamation to Sheriff Don Hunter, who, in turn, recognized relatives of fallen Deputy Sheriffs of Collier County who gave their lives in the line of duty and pro- vided statistics and information regarding assaults on law enforcement officers, etc., Couissionsr Maunders moved, seconded by Commtmmto~er Shmnmhmn and carried unanimously, that the Proclamation De~t~ttng M~y 12, 1992 aa Collier County Law Enforcement D~F ~ Mm~ 11-15, 1992 as Collier County Law Enforcement Memorial Page 4 Hay 12, 1992 Xt~ ~6&! & ~6&2 ~ ~$ 92-252, 92-257~ 92-2§9, AH]:} 92-261/27! - ADOPteD Commissioner Hasse moved, seconded by Couissioner Goodnight and ca~ried ~nantmou~l¥, that ~dge~ ~en~ent~ 92-252, 92-257, 92-259, ~ 92-262/271 ~ adopted. lt~ ~A3 ~ ~ ~SOL~ION 92-22 - ~ED Commissioner Hasse ~oved, seconded by Coaslsstoner Goodntght and carried unanimously, that Budget A~end~ent Resolution 92-22 be adopted. Page 5 Hay ~2o ~992 REPORT OF IMPACT FEE INCENTIVES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT I~PARED B~ THE JOINT AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY AND THE CITY OF NAPLES - ACCEPTED/TO BE USED AS CONCEPTUAL GUIDE TO DIRECT STAFF TO PREPAR~ APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION AND DEVELOP FUNDING SOURCE Bryan L. Weber, Chairman of the Joint Affordable Housing Commiss~on, reported on last week's successful meeting with the City Council and distributed copies of a letter from Dr. Richard L. Woodruff. He recommended that the community establish a succinct ~mpact fee program or Ordinance that clearly defines impact fee guide- lines and incentives for target income groups. The following persons spoke to the issue: Jane Varner, member of TAG (Taxpayers Action Group) Rev. Allen of CURE (Collier United for Rights & Equality, Inc.) Fred N. Thomas, Jr. Robert Sommer, member of TAG (Taxpayers Action Group) Berrie Gu]acsik, representing League of Women Voters of Collier County Ken Hunt, Affordable Housing Commission member Co~tssi~ner Shanahan moved, seconded by Couissioner Goodntght and carried unanimously, to accept the final report of the iq&ct fee tncenttv~s for Affordable Housing Developments, use it u · conceptual ~l~lde to direct staff to prepare the appropriate Resolutions and O~diz~ncee, and develop funding sources to implement the report. Page 6 Nay 12, 1992 ~.e=e~s: 10:2§ P.M. - Reconvened: 10:40 P.M. at which time De~ut~ Clerk Hoffman replaced Deputy Clerk Farris Item #12B1 PETITION PUD-82-20{3), WILLIAM R. VINES OF VINES & ASSOCIATES, INC., REPRESENTING NORTH NAPLES UTILITIES, INC., REQUESTING A REZONE FROM PUD TO PUD KNOWN AS QUAIL II PUD, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, 1/2 MILE EAST OF 1-75 - CONTINUED TO 6/16/92 County Attorney Cuyler advised that this item deals with a rezone from PUD to PUD known as Quail II PUD. He indicated that Mr. Vines is present, noting that he has been extremely cooperative in continuan- ces. He reported that this project is in an area in North Naples where staff is developing other information. He related that members of the public have requested a continuance of this matter until staff comes back with information on the other items. County Attorney Cuyler stated that he discussed this matter with Mr. Vines and informed him that he would note for the record that the continuance for five weeks is requested by staff. He revealed that this item does not need to be readvertised. Commissioner Shanahan moved, seconded by Couiesioner Goodnlght ~ =azTle~ ux~animonsl¥, to continue Petition PUD-82-20(S) until June 16, 1992. RKO>ClOT ~ITH RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE TRANSFER OF THE MARCO ISLAND AII~PORT FROM TH~ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (FDNR) TO OOLLIE/~ COUNT~ - FDNR PROPOSAL REJECTED; STAFF TO COUNTER OFFER Transportation Services Administrator Archibald stated that this item is a report on the Marco Island Airport and a review of a propo- sal from DNR for the transfer of the airport from State Lands to the county. Mr. Archibald provided the Commission with an overview of the airport operation, noting that this is a $450,000 per year operation and the county has been netting approximately 10% of the revenues. Mr. Archibald explained that DNR is proposing a land swap that relates to the value of the airport versus the value of what would be Page 7 May 12, 1992 Gained from that land swap: transfer three sections of land owned by the county in the Fakahatchee Strand valued at $1,200,000; transfer 417 acres held in the GAC Trust, valued at $.4 million; pay FDNR 3% of gross monthly revenues less fuel sales; and receive 10¢ per Gallon on the fuel sold or 5% of Gross fuel sales. He indicated that the total of these four elements amounts to approximately $1.7 million. He remarked that this value is below the value of the airport which is $2.3 million. Mr. Archibald advised that staff's analysis indicates that the proposal by DNR is about $500,0000 below the value of the airport. He indicated that the land held in the GAC Trust valued at $.4 million has to be paid and remain in the Trust. He explained that the County would have to find that amount of money to purchase the land from the GAC Trust and then transfer the land to the DNR. He revealed if the County agrees to the terms, as proposed by DNR, the County may not be able to subsidize the funds necessary to pay back the GAC Trust. With regard to the counter-offer, Mr. Archibald proposed that the Fakahatchee Strand property received by the County free and clear would be transferred to DNR; pay DNR 3% of Gross monthly revenues less fuel revenue; pay DNR 100~ of net profit computed on gross revenues less Gross operatinG expenditures and less the identified capital sinking fund which would be zero. A discussion ensued with regard to FDNR's proposal and the County's counter-proposal. Commissioner Saunders suggested that the Commission advise the State that the land in the Fakahatchee Strand will be traded in exchange for taking the airport off their hands. Commissioner Shanahan concurred, and noted that consideration may want to be given to a long term lease option. C~imsion~r Saunders ~oved, seconded by Conisaloner Shanahan az~ carrie4 ~nani~oualy, to reject FDNR's proposal; staff to counter- offer exch~n~ of land in the Fakahatchee Strand in total con- midermtion for the Marco Island A~rport. , 38 ~age 8 Hay 12, ~992 ~P~&T~ ~ TI~ COt~iT~S ~IRI~G lrR~Z~ - APPROVAL O[ TO ~ SAVINGS TO VARIOUS CONTINGENCY FUNDS County Manager Dorrill presented a slide presentation with respect to the County's hiring freeze. He indicated that this continues to be a tremendous money saver for the County, in addition to beefing up the reserve funds. He reported that thus far, the freeze has saved Just under $3 million, since the inception of the program at the beginning of the 1991 fiscal year. Mr. Dorrill advised that there was an average of 80 vacancies throughout the year, noting that currently, there are 94 vacant posi- tions. He revealed that he will be looking to fill some of the posi- tions in Parks and Rec and Utilities. He affirmed that year-to-date turnover has been less than 6~. Mr. Dorrlll requested that the Commission authorize the approval of budget amendments to transfer the dollar savings into the various contingency funds. Co~mimsioner Saunders ~oved, seconded by Co~mtssionsr Shanahan and carried ~tmly, that the ~cessa~ ~dgets ~n~nts ~ prepared to trmfer ~ fro~ the sala~ locations to the appropriate resets ~OL~I~ 92-282, ~OVINO ~ INITI~ TE~S OF O~ICE FOR ~ERS OF ~ ~IST D~LO~ CO.OIL - ~ED, AS ~ED Assistant County Attorney Wilson stated that this item was included in the consent agenda. She indicated that the resolution designates the length of terms of the appointments to the Tourist Development Council and releases a typographical error, noting that the word "Chairman" was not included under the appointment of term for Michael J. Volpe. Ce~mtse~oner Saundere ~oved, ~econded by Co~atssioner Shanahan and c~rle~ un~ni~cru~ly, that Remolutton 92-282 be adopted u ~nded. Page 9 Nay 12, 1992 Ite~ ~lO& TOURIST D~FELO~ COUNCIL REQUEST WITH RESPECT TO BEACH ACCESS PARE/I~ - COU]~I~' ATTORNEY TO FORWARD LETTER TO ATTORNEY GENERAL I~INi] OPINION Commissioner Volpe apprised the Board that the TDC has met for the past three weeks. He revealed that 16 representatives from the public have addressed the five categories under F.S. authorized for expen- ditures. He remarked that a question was posed with regard to the use of bed tax dollars for beach access parking. Commissioner Volpe Indicated that the Commission asked the County Attorney to provide the TDC with an opinion as to whether, under beach renourtshment, monies could be expended for beach access parking and maintenance. He revealed that the County Attorney advised the TDC that this would require the submission of a request for an opinion to the Attorney General's office and this could only be done if directed to do so by the Board of County Commissioners. He stated that the TDC is requesting that the Commission direct the County Attorney's office to request an expedited opinion from the Attorney General's office and provide support research tn connection with same, and specifically ask If bed tax dollars may be used for beach access parking as It relates to acquisition. ~mai~io~er Sarmndere ~oved, seconded by Comieeloner Shanahan and carrt~ ~l~ously, that the County Attorney's office be directed to fol'w~x'd · litter to the Attorney General's office requesting an opl- ntoll with r~pect to bed tax dollars being used for beach access Itu#11 County Manager Dorrtll updated the Commission on the improvements along Gulf Shore Drive at Vanderbt/t Beach. He advised that a "Stop Work" notice was Issued on the paving of the sidewalk until a deter- minatton was made as to whether staff should look further Into thls matter. He reported that the fixed fee contract for the paving 42 Page 10 May 12, 1992 proposed to be done ts $55,741. He announced if modifications are necessary entailing lighter equipment and hand work, the costs could be as much as $150,000 to relocate the sidewalk further off the edge of the road. County Manager Dorrill stated that he contemplates a serpentine type sidewalk which would move in and around other public facilities in the same area, i.e.. water main, above ground compound water meter and valves, fire hydrants and above ground utilities. The following persons spoke with respect to the proposed sidewalk paving: Mr. Art Jacob Mr. Michael Moore Mrs. Betty Pangle ~~l~r S~umder. ~r~d, seconded by Couissioner Hesse and CaZTild ~x~l~n~ly, not to t~uaedtately proceed with the current c~ntract; C~an%-F Manager and Transportation Services Ad~inistrator with ~%~m~x'~. Jacob and Moore and Mrs. Pangle: and explore other alter- ~ativ~e fur f~um~ing and report back in two weeks. Ite~ ,12B2 O~,DI]~kNL'~ 92-Sl, ]~E PUD 89-21(1), MR. ROBERT L. DUANE OF HOLE, MONTES AND ASSOCIATES ~HQUESTING A ZONING CHANGE FROM PUD TO PUD FOR PU]~POSES OF AMENDING TH~ LIVINGSTON ROAD COUNTRY CLUB PUD - ADOPTED WITH CONDXTIONS Legal notice havlng been published in the Naples Dally News on March 26, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Planner Bellows advised that this item is a request for an amend- ment to the Livingston Road Country Club PUD to allow for agricultural uses until such time as development commences on the project. He indicated that the subject site is located in a predominantly agri- cultural area. Mr. Bellows divulged that since the construction of Livingston Road has been delayed indefinitely, the petitioner is unable to deve- lop this property as currently allowed by the PUD document. Page 11 Nay 32, ~992 Mr. Robert Duane, representing Associates of Livingston Road, Inc., advised that his client desires to be treated the same as the 15 other PUD's that have the same privilege that is being requested. He indicated that his client is willing to accept placing a limitation on the agricultural use which would be 5 years or until such time that Livingston Road is constructed, whichever occurs first. Commissioner Volpe questioned whether the purpose of the requested amendment is to allow the petitioner to apply for and obtain an agri- cultural exemption for the property with the purpose of same being a tax benefit. Mr. Duane replied in the affirmative. Commissioner Saunders stated that he feels the petitioner is caught up in a mistake that is not their fault. He indicated that they followed the procedure on the books when their PUD was approved. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that the adjoining property owner complained about the agricultural use and questioned whether staff is aware of the basis of that objection. Mr. Bellows replied that he does not have the official complaint, but noted that he understands that the cows went through the fence and wandered to the property line. Commissioner Volpe stated that in February, the Commission approved early work permits for this project to begin work on the Golf course. He remarked that he feels that five years is too lonG to qualify for the agricultural exemption. He suggested a one year limi- tation for the agricultural exemption. There were no speakers. CO~ls~Crner $&unders ~oved, seconded by Co-rmisaloner cmrrt~ ~imly, to close the ~bltc hearing. ~i~r Sanders m~ed, seconded ~ Co~tss~oner Sh~ ~d c~ 4/1 (C~iss~one~ Vol~ op~sed), that O~din~ce 92-31 ~t~ a ~tmr~ into Ordinate ~ok No. 52, ~bJect to the ~itt~ of the e~lter of three ~ents: e~iration of a~i~l~al m ~or a ~t~ of five ye~s from this ~te; collation Page 12 Livin~on Road to provide access to the property; or the construction of ~ other eut/~st road to provide access to the ~ubJect pro- ese R~cea~ed 12:30 P.M. - Reconvened 1:15 P.M. at which ttu D~puty Clerk Meyers replaced D~p~ty Clerk Hoff~n **" Itn #12Cl RESODUTIO~ 92-283 RE PETITION AV 92-005, ROBERT C. OEBHART AS AGENT FOR O~NER, FRED HOPFINGER, REQUESTING VACATION OF A PORTION OF THE 15 FOOT I~tAIHA~E AND UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON A PORTION OF THE PLAT OF TH~ LOI~I~ OF WTNDEM~R~ - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 26, 1992 and May 3, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Russ Muller, Engineer I with Transportation Services, reported that this Petition ts a request for a vacation of a portion of a drainage and utility easement, due to a survey revealing that a por- tion of the Petitioner's pool deck and pool enclosure encroaches approximately five feet upon a fifteen foot utility drainage easement, and he wants to vacate that portion and leave an easement of ten feet. Co~lston~r Saunderl ~oved, seconded by Coutssioner Sbanahan and carried unant~onsly, to close the public hearing. Co~/emioner Saunders ~oved, seconded by Coutseloner Shanahan and carried ~xn~i~na~ly, to approve Petition AV 92-005, the=shy mdopt~ng Re~olution 92-283. Page ! 3 12. ~992 ~,O'I'ZOI 92-284 P~ PETITZON AV 92-008 TO VACAT~ A 30 FOOT DRAZNAGE AND UT~LZTT ~A~T LOCATED ON THE PLAT OF VICTORIA PARE TWO ADDITION -AD~FT~D Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 26, 1992 and May 3, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of P~/bl~cation filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Transportation Services Administrator Archibald reported that this is a petition to consider vacation of a 30 foot drainage and utility easement within Victoria Park. He noted that the Petitioner is requesting the vacation of a 30 foot easement approximately 600 feet in length and will be relocating a drainage facility within that ease- ment, specifically a 48 inch pipe to a new location that is being platted and provided for in the Hidden Harbour At Victoria Park's Plat. Co.~/~o~r Sa~nders ~ved, seconded b~ Co~ltSsioner Shanahan ~u~d C~ZT~4 w~*~J~mzely, to close the public hearing. ~~= S~mders ~oved, seconded by Co~issioner Shanahan And C~Ti~ ~J~m~y, tO a~rove Petition AV 92-008, thereby adopting Jtee~]~t~e~ 92-284. Page 14 ]%E~OLUTION 92-285, SUPERSEDING RESOLUTION 91-§24 MODIFYING THE TERMINATION DATE ~R ~ ARCHITECTURAL OVERLAY DISTRICT CITIZENS AD HO~ AD~I$OR~ COg~IITTEE - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 26, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Bob Lord, Project Planner, explained that this resolution merely changes the time frame for the effective termination date of the Ad Hoc Committee for the Architectural Review Board Overlay District to create development standards for an entryway into Golden Gate City. Specif~cally, he noted that the proposed language will read that the Committee will serve for a one year term. ~lltc~lr Huse moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodntght and carr~ ux~nt~l¥, to close the F;ubltc hearing. ~teatoner Hasee moved, seconded by Commissioner Goodntght and carr~e~ 1~nl~aly, to adopt Resolution 92-285. Page 15 12, 1992 O~D~ 92-32, AMENDING SECTION NINE OF COLLIER COUN~"~ ORDINANCE 80-47, ~ GOLLIER COUNT~ PARKING ORDINANCE - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 23, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. David We~gel, Assistant County Attorney, reported that this Ordinance will clarify the Parking Ordinance in terms of handicapped parking, and will place a statutory cap of $250 for illegal parking ~n a handicapped space, and a cap of $100 for other parking violations. C~mltoner Hasse moved, seconded by Cowmissioner Shanahan and c~rrl~ ~t~u~ly, to close the public hearing. C~A~to~er Sh, anahan ~ed, seconded ~ Co~tss~oner Sa~rl ~d ~~ ~~1~, t~ Ord~n~ce 92-32 ~ adopted ~d entered ~nto ~ ~k ~. 52. ~ ~~, INC., ~S~ING ~S ~ A~ F. ~ILTON, ~~ ~ D~I~ OF ~ C~ATIBILI~ ~CE~ION FOR ~OP~ AT ~ ~IO~ OF AI~RT RO~ ~ U.S. 41 - ~D ~ Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 28, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed w~th the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Commissioner Volpe requested anyone that would be offering testimony to stand and be sworn in. M~chelle Edwards, Planner II, pointed out surrounding properties in relation to the subject property on an aerial photograph, which is located in the East Naples Planning Community. She noted that currently the subject property is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Airport Road and U. S. 41 East approximately 200 feet west of A~rport Road, 130 feet south of Calusa Avenue and 735 feet north of U.S. 41 East, and ts currently zoned C-3 and is located in the traffic congestion boundary, and that the subject property ts Page 16 May 12, 1992 eligible for the residential infill provision within the future land use plan. She verified that upon evaluation, it was concluded that the development permitted by the proposed consistent zoninG district would not create or excessively increase traffic in the surrounding area, however, the existing zoning district permits several uses that would increase and could adversely impact the surrounding area because the subject property would have to access the commercial uses from Calusa Avenue. Ms. Edwards reported that the Appellant included two options for consideration: 1. Leave the C-3 Zoning District as is and limit the uses to offices; 2. Rezone the property to RMF-6 and C1/T. Ms. Edwards reported that the traffic impacts for these proposals would be substantial to the existing residential area around the pro- perty. Ms. Edwards summarized that the recommendation is for denial of the Appeal and to rezone the subject property to RSF-4. Thomas Hamilton, Appellant, referred to an aerial photograph and contended that his property will fill the need for office space in the future. He further noted that the surrounding properties are too intense for Staff's proposed RSF-4 zoning. He commented that he has owned this property since 1953 and perceives that this location is appropriate for an office site. ~tooeF S~mnahan moved, seconded by Coamtsstonsr Goodnlght ·nd C~l~ied~ni~ov~l¥, to close the Fubltc hearing. C4~U~lmer Sa~x~era moved, seconded by Co~sstoner Shanahmn and c~zT~d ~t~o~1¥, to approve the request to rezone the ~ub~ect pro- l)er%~ to Cl/T w~th access through Lots 7, 8, 9, and 10 only, and a height l~m~tation of two stories, thereby adopting Resolution 92-286. Page 17 Ply 12, 1992 Tt~ ~r'J. 2C4 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on March 28, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Commissioner Volpe asked that anyone offering testimony to stand and be sworn in. X~ ~4 Elly Soto, Planner II, reported that the property is located on the east side of Airport-Pulling Road ~ 250 feet south of the inter- section of Airport-Pulling Road and Glades Boulevard, and is currently zoned C-4 which comprises 4.5 acres and RMF-6, which comprises 30.5 acres. She noted the zoning of the surrounding properties. She cited examples of numerous projects i.e. Boca Palms, Victoria Park, Crescent Lakes, Lakeside, Walden Oaks, that abut Airport Road and are strictly residential. Ms. Soto noted the fo/lowing options which could be utilized for the subject property: a) Rezone to allow the conversion of the 4.5 commercial acres to residential; b) Applicant could utilize affordable housing within the RMF-6 area of the subject property. Ms. Soto concluded that the commercial parcel is narrow and deve- lopment would be severely limited by requirements of setbacks, landscaping, water management, and deceleration lanes. She added that the commercial uses would be more intense than the residential uses, and that the applicant has the ability to apply for the conversion of co~srcial to residential, which will add additional units and giving a lot more flexibility on the site. She deemed the residential por- t,on of the property is compatible with surrounding land uses. In response to Commissioner Volpe, Ms. Soto reported that the Page 18 Nay 12, 1992 access to the RKF-6 would be through the C-4 District. Samra Holland, Attorney representing the Appellant, referred to the determination letter from Staff and asserted that it is confusing. She contended that three other parcels along Airport Road subject to the ZRO were granted exemptions or compatibility exceptions, a/lowing the commercial zoning on these properties to be retained. Ms. Holland commented that this Appeal is to retain the C-4 and RMF-6 zoning. Ms. Holland read a letter reporting on findings by Dr. Tanner to the ]~oard (copy not provided to the Clerk to the Board). Commtutoz24r Shan~h~n ~ed, ~econded ~ Co~tsstoner Sa~r~ ~d ~1~ ~i~ly, to rec~ize Ro~rt ~e ~ ~ e~rt in the ~a of 1~ m plying. Robert ~ane referred to a photograph o~ the subject property and surro~d/ng areas, and noted that there Is no resident/al land uses between U.5, 4~ and Airport ~oad, and the character of the surrounding land uses Is not conducive to the three units per acre that Staff is reco~endlng. He stated that the extsttng zoning ts appropriate and compatible ~d ts less Intensive than the surrounding zoning. Hr. ~ane referred to an exhibit (copy not provided to the Clerk to the Board) prepared by Dr. Tanner, depicting the decibel readings t~en from Airport Road and denoting that approximately 60~ o~ the ~bJect property falls tn excess of what are normally acceptable dec/- be] r~ges for residential development. Hr. Duane clarified Dr. Tamer's conclusions that screening and buffering by itself would not be sufffictent to overcome the limitations oF this slte for residential development and that co~erctal development off the 200 ~eet along Airport Road is adequate and could attenuate the impacts of noise and glare ~d f~es. Hr. ~e suggested the follow/ng restrictions on the subject pro- perty, which the Appellant agrees to: limit height to three stories, Increase buffer from ~5 to 20 feet along Airport Road, and increase side yard requirements from ~5 to 30 feet. 81 Page Nay 12, ~992 Mr. Duane concluded that ex/sting zoning ls adequate and deemed that there is insufficient evidence to support three dwelling units per acre, and with the constraints of Airport Road - the noise and traffic - that a transitional use is more appropriate. Commissioner Saunders left the meeting at this time. Commtuloner Shanahan ~ved, seconded b~ Cow~iastoner Goodntght ~d ~~ 4/0 (Cm~se~oner S~de=s absent), to rec~ize R~c~d ~1~ u ~ ~r~ on ~al~tton ~d ~lyoia of real pro~r~ Co~fssioner Saunders returned ~o the meeting at this time. Mr. Ar~lavage reported ~hat his analysis concluded that the sub- ]ect property should be considered as two separate properties, mainly ~cause of the surrounding uses, and the existing trends throughout th~s neighborhood. He noted the hea~ traffic w~th~n th~s area as we~l as the noise and congestion. He discussed ~hat ~t fs nearly ~Hposs~ble to m~t~gate the no,se patterns ~n this area, and ~t would take an unusually large amount of land a=ea to mitigate it fo= resi- dential, particularly low density res]denTla]. Mr. Armalavage concluded tha~ this environment is already dic- tated, already established, and for this reason the pattern should be followed that already exists. Ms. Holl~d expressed that C-3 zoning is acceptable provided offi- ces c~ be utilized in conjunct/on with the existing automobile dealership. ~~r ~tght ~, meconded ~ Co~isstoner S~ ~ ~~ ~~1~, to close the ~blic hearing. ~~r S~ ~ed, seconded ~ Coo]ss/oner ~]ght ~ ~l~ ~~]y, to zone the front ~rtion of ~he pro~r~ ~ C-3 ~ ~ ~ ~rtion ~ ~-6, to accept the ~ffer~ng co~t- ~to ef ~. ~ ~ to the eideo ~d front ~rtio~ ~ ~1 u his ~~ to ~de a Un~fted PI~ of ~elo~ent, ~d to prohibit ~t~ ~nt~t~ ~rc~al ~e~ ~.e. fast food re~taur~ts, convenience ~t, ~ ~t~bile ee~ice station, ~ch are ~itT~ in C-3 D~str~ct, t~re~ ~op~ng ~eolut~on 92-287. May 12, 1992 lt~: 3:30 P.M. - Reconvened: 3:§0 P.N. at ~htch tim l~t~Z Clark Guevin replaced Deputy Clerk Me~zere ''' Xtem~12C5 KE~ODOTXO~ 92-288 RE CEX-014-SN/A, L. MADISON GALBRIATH, APPEALING DEII~L OF ~MPATIBILITT EXCEPTION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST $I1~ 0~P DIXIE D~l~rE, NORTH OF CONFEDERATE DRIVE EXTENSION TO U.S. 4! AND ~,[~T O~ U.S. 41 (.56 ACRES) - ADOPTED ALLC~ING PROPERTY TO REMAIN Legal not/ce having been published in the Naples Dally News on March 28, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication f/led with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Co~isstoner Volpe swore in all those intending to participate in discussion of this item. Planner Weeks stated the subject property is on the fringe of the Naples Manor subdivision. He advised after reviewing surrounding zoning and development, it ts Staff's opinlon that the parcel should be rezoned, with conditions, to the C-1 zoning district, which is con- sistent and compatible with surrounding properties. He stated access should be limited to U.S. 41 only. He noted the subject parcel does not front on U.S. 41, however, the adjacent properties are under the same ownership, and Staff is requesting those properties be developed as a unified plan of development. He said another condition is to limit development to 25,000 square feet on the subject lots. Attorney Bruce Anderson, representing the petitioner, commented the three lots that are the subject of this appeal are part of an approximately two-acre, irregularly shaped parcel under common ownership with frontage on U.S. 41. He noted 78% of the sides of the parcel are bounded by improved C-4 zoning. He said the property should be allowed to retain Its current C-4 zoning under the commer- cial criteria provision of the Growth Management Plan. He remarked Staff is being inconsistent in the treatment of this parcel by insisting on a unified development plan while splitting a two-acre parcel into two zoning districts. He indicated there is further incons~stency in Staff's willingness to treat the property as a whole for purposes of limiting access, but they are not willing to treat it Page 21 May 12, 1992 as a whole in order to meet the commercial under criteria provision. Referring to the performance standards, he emphasized that the owner is willing to subject his adjacent property to development conditions that would not otherwise apply. Attorney Anderson asked the Board to accept Kent Steele as an expert witness tn real estate appraisal and market analysis and Robert Duane as an expert in land planning. ~ ~t~ ~tmly, to accept the m~e referenced Wt~ellel al Kent Steele, Co~erctal Real Estate Appraiser with Cushman Associates tn Naples, Justified his opinion that rezontng the subject pro~rty to the C-1 zoning district ts not feasible because of the ~rket for office space tn Collier County, stating development as an office building would not be a reasonable use for any time In the foreseeable future. He referred to Exhibit "D" which he said repre- sents the highest and best use of a un~fted site, including all lots. He said a co~erctal center with retail and service uses would not only serve the t~edtate area, but ts also financially feasible. In response to Planner Weeks, Mr. Steele stated office buildings tn the t~edtate area will perform poorly tn perpetuity, because the area ts not the office center of the Naples metropolitan area. He reported there Is a clear trend that office properties developed out- side the d~to~ area suffer from very high vacancy rates. Robert ~ane with Hole, Montes & Associates, stressed the tmpor- t~ce of the unified o~ership surrounding the sub3ect parcel. He ~bmitted that retaining commercial zoning with the conditions noted in the performance standards can be determined to be tn conformance with the Gr~th Management Plan. He said the petitioner's proposal will result in a more efficient and compatible use than the C-1 zoning district. Planner Weeks asked if the appellant ts willing to stipulate to Page 2 2 ~ay ~2, 1992 development as demonstrated on Exhibit "D", to which Mr. Duane responded in the affirmative. s.s ~s~/~imr H~sma left the mttng mt this tt~e. '*' Attorney Anderson commented on the practical and legal con- siderations for allowing the property to remain C-4, concluding the petitioner is prepared with reasonable compromises in order to do so. Planner Weeks reminded the Board that the ZRO program ts in place to look at Inconsistently zoned properties and change them to something that Is consistent, in order to do away with strip zoning and reduce residential densities. In conclusion, he requested that al/-development restrictions and standards proposed by the appellant be Imposed If the Board agrees with the request to retain C-4 zoning. ~~to~er Shanahan ~ed, seconded ~ Co~tmstoner Oo~tght ~ ~i~ 4/0 (C~tssi~er Hames ~t), to close the ~blic hearing. ~~~ S~ ~ed, seconded ~ Co~lsstoner G~t~ht ~ ~, ~b~ to t~ d~elo~t st~rds ~ pro~sed ~ the ~l~t M ~t t~ pretties ~ ~bJect to a ~ifi~ 1~ d~ l~t ;lm, mW adoptln~ Resolution 92-288. Page 23 Hay 12, 1992 Ite~#llll RESOF~TTION 92-289 RE PETITION V-92-8, COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES DIFI$IO~, REQ~IESTING A 66'4' VARIANCE FROW THE R~QUIR~D FRONT YARD OF ?5' TO 5'8", AND A 24'4" VARIANCE FROM THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD OF 30' TO 5'8" FOR A PORTION OF LAND IN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES - ADOPTED SUBJECT Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on April 26, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Glerk, public hearing was opened. Planner Arnold asked the Board to consider Items #13Al, #13A2 and · 13A5 together. He explained the County's Utilities Division is req~uesting variances for the front and side yards on property zoned Estates on the west side of 6th Avenue SE and immediately adjacent to the Golden Gate Canal. Referring to Item #13A1, he stated as part of the Wellfteld Expansion Program, the County acquired the uttltty ease- ment over this parcel and has constructed the well head on the pro- perty. Me indicated in an attempt to build the control building over the well head, this variance is necessary. He noted the other two variance requests are essentially the same and are located approxima- tely one mile south of this property, ad3acent to the Warren Brothers PUD, which ts an excavation pit. He remarked although there is no true land related hardship for these sites, there may be a financial hardship or a hardship on the County's ability in the future to site these types of facilities. He concluded, however, that Staff has recommended denial of the variances based on the fact there is no land related hardship. ~D~l~du~r S~a.nah. a~ ~ove~, seconded b~ ~T~ 4/0 (~teetoner Huse ~t), to close the ~bltc he~tn~. ~~t~= S~ ~, seconded c~t~ ~/0 (~t~stoner Huse ~), to approve Petition V-92-8, ~t to t~ ~~t Sheet, there~ adopttn~ Remolu~ton 92-289. Page 24 Nay 12, 1992 Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 26, 1992, as evidenced by Affidav~t of Publication f~led w~th the Clerk, public hearing was opened. This Item was heard In conjunction with Item #13Al. ~lltoner Shmnahan moved, seconded by Conisstoner Saunders and cax~ie~ 4/0 (Cmieeloner Hawse o~t), ~o close ~he ~blic he~ng. ~t~r S~ secon~d ~ Co~issioner Sanders ~d ~~ 4/0 (C~tlst~er Huse ~t), to a~r~e Petition V-92-9, ~ J~ ~ ~ ~t Sh~t, there~ adopting Re~olutt~ 92-290, 72 Page 25 Hay 12, 1992 I~OL~ON g2-291R~ PL'rITION V-92-10, COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIZS DIVISION, ~QU~fING AN 11'4' VARIANCE FROM TH~ P~QUIP~D I~ONT YARD OF 50' T~ $8'~', J~ND & 24'4' VARIANCE FOB THE REQUIRED SIDE YARD OF 30' TO 5'8m FO~ · I~3RTION OF LAND IN GOLDEN GATE ESTATES - ADOPTED SUBJECT Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 26, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. This item was heard in conjunction with Item #13A1. ~*mi~ $1~n~han imoved, seconded by Co~issioner Saundere and C~T~ 4/~ (~i~ioner Ha~se =ut), to close the public he&rin~. ~/m~ner Shan~/~an ~oved, seconded by Co~isstoner Saunders and c~r~ 4/0 (Co~t~eioner H~se out), to approve Petition V-92-10, · ~b~ to tl~e Agl-~t Sheet, thereby adoptin~ Resolution 92-29~. 78' Page 26 May 12, 1992 Item ~O~1~0~ ~2--292 RE PETITION V-92-?, JAi~[ES AND ~ ~S ~~ A ~ ~ V~I~CE ~ ~ ~qUI~D ~ Y~ S~CK O~ 10 ~ ~ ~~ S~U~S TO 4 ~ET, ~ A O~ IN~ V~I~CE IN P~ ~ ~ ~I~ SIDE Y~D S~CK OF 7.5 ~ET TO 7 ~KT 5 IN~ ~ ~ ~I~ING DETA~D G~GE BUILT IN 1980 AT 3080 ~ Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on April 26, 1992, as evidenced by Affidav~t of Publication fi/ed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Planner Badamtchtan explained this petition involves a garage that was built tn 1980 without a building permit. He mentioned the garage has appeared on the tax roil and taxes have been paid since 1984. He concluded the CCPC reviewed this petition and recommended unanimous approval. James Jenkins urged the Board to approve his requested variance. He said there have been no objections from neighbors and it would serve no purpose to tear down the structure at this point in time. ~t~to~r S4mndere ~v~l, seconded by Conisetoner Shanahan and c~rTl~d 4/0 (Coemtesioner Hasse out), to close the public hearing. ~Nioner S~nnders z~ved, seconded by Contssioner Shanahan and ~p_-~l'led 4/0 (Cosmlsetoner Hasae out), to approve Petition V-92-?, thel~b~ ~opting Re~olutton 92-292. Page 27 May ~2, ~992 RE~,OTIO~ 92-293 RE PETITION NUA-92-1, ADAM AND DEANA SA~ONS, ~ ~ ~TION OF A NON-C0~ING SINGLE F~ILY ~SID~CE ~ ~ ~A~ AT 3200 B~ A~ - ~D Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on April 26, 1992, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened. Plmr~ne~ Mulhere explained the subject property is zoned Mobile Home (M H) and consists of approximately three acres of land on which there is currently a small single family house of approximately 728 square feet, a detached garage and a small storage shed and laundry room. He indicated the petitioner wishes to enlarge his home by 900 square feet to accommodate his growing family. He explained because the property is zoned MH, single family homes are not permitted as a principal use, therefore, a request must be made of the Board of County Commissioners for a non-conforming use alteration. He noted there have been no objections received, and the CCPC has forwarded Petition NUA-92-! with a recommendation for approval. ~~lo~er S~a.nahan moved, seconded by Co-liSsioner Goodntght ~d wez~.le4 4/0 (Co.~tssioner Hasse =ut), to close the public heaz'~ng. Ce~.m~mmer Goodnight moved, seconded by Cow~ssioner Shanmhan · m~ ~XTI~ 4/O (C~lssionsr Hasse out), to approve Petition · U&--92-1, t]m~e~F ~dopting Re~olution 92-293. Page 28 Item #14 BOARD OP COq;NTT COJ~/SSlORERS' COMMUNICATIONS May 12, 1992 Commissioner Saunders asked the Board to consider directing the County Attorney to provide information on setting up an independent Board of Zoning Appeals or hiring a Hearing Examiner. It was the consensus to direct the County Attorney to include discussion of an independent Board of Zoning Appeals and a hearing examiner position on the Board of County Commissioners' agenda as soon as possible. After discussion, it was the consensus that the Budget Workshop scheduled for 9:00 A.M. on June 18th will be rescheduled to begin at 1:30 P.M. Assistant County Attorney Wilson updated the Board on the status of the Case involving April C~rcle. Sue Fi/son, Administrative Assistant to the Board, reported con- cern~ng vacancies on the Collier County Planning Commission, Affordable Housing Commission and the Historical Archaeological Preservation Board. ''' ~t~iolmer Shanahan movmd, seconded by Comltsetoner ~ C~XTteqS 5/0, t~t the foll~tng items ~der the co~t ~ ~ ~/o= adopted: ~~ 92-2~B ~ING ~R ~C0~ING ~E FIN~ P~T 0F "HIDD~ ~ AT ~~A P~" - ~ ~ STI~ATIONS SET ~R~ IN See Pages 92--276 APPROVING FOR RECORDING THE FINAL FLAT OF "GOLDEN I~TATI~ UNIT 31, TRACT 7 REPLAT' - WITH THE STIPULATIONS SET See Page /,/,~ ACCEPTAIICE OIP CASH BOND AS SECURITY FOR LANDSCAPING FOR SITE DE~FKLOI%~JfT PLAN NO. 91-166 'CROSS CREEK POOL AND SOCIAL CLUB' Page 29 1992 92-277 APT~OVING FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF "CAROL'S ~ TIE STIPULATIONS SET FOI~ IN THE EXKCUTIVK SUMMANY See Page /./& Item A4~PTAIICK OF LETTER OF CRKDIT AS SECURITY FOR ~C~IN~ ~ ~I~ Item ~16A6 AO~lmT~ OF CASN ~0ND AS SECURITY FO~ LANDSCAPIN~ FOR SITE ~ PLAN NO. 91-77 "3950 MERCANTILE AVENUE" Itu S16&7 A~KPT~ OF CASH BOND AS SKCURITY FOR LANDSCAPING FOR SITE ~ PT~L]f NO. 92-33 'WENUY'S AT G]~KKNT]~KE CENTER" ~ FOR CAPITAL I~IRCHASES FO~ TECHNICAL PLANNING PLANNING DEPARTMENT - NOT TO EXCEED $6,289 A~EPTAII~ OP F~TTE~ OF C~EDIT AS ALTEKNATE SECII~ITY FO~ ~LAK~ AYALON It~u AG~T~ OF CKI~TIFICATK OF DKP~SIT AS SECURITY FOR LANDSCAPING FOR SITE ~ ~ NO. 91-73 "AFRIL CIRCL~-" Ite~ ,16&11 A6~EPT~ OF CASH BOND AS S~CURITY FOR LANDSCAPING FOR SITE DL~vE~3~T PLAN NO. 91-166 "AVALON AT PELICAN BAY' IXSCVT~ON OF ~ AGP~EKENT AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A~J~IB~BrT F~R THI ACQUISITION OF PARCKLS 113 AND 713 ON IJ~qOKALKE ROAD (PROJICT JO. 66041) See Pages / ~:~/- Item ~(]1 OF & T~IP~R&NY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AG~~ ~ A ~ ~ION ~~ ~R ~ ACQUISITION OF P~ 712 ON (PRO.TI[CT NO. 6604~) I,tr/ ~2~ ~992 I~e~ #16B3 See Pages ~RA~TIIK] OF EASEMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTI~ENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) ~ A $"I~RAIN POLE LOCATION FOR A FLASHING BEACON AT THE PORT OF ~ OF ~ EQUIPMENT AND SOFTWARE TO AU(~ENT AND REPLACE ~ ~(~ IN THE TRANSPORTATION DIVISION 92-278 AND RESOLUTION 92-279 AU~'HORIZING TWO MAINTENANCE ~ TH~ FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR ~PI~ A~D ~EDIAN ~WING SeePages /J7- Item PlEB~ EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL AG~~ WI~ HOLE, M0~ES ~ ASS~IA~S, INC. ~ ~ITI~ DKSI~, PErilING ~ P~ ~P~TION S~ICES ~~~ ~ BID STAGE A~IVITIES (CIE PROJECT 006) - IN ~E L~ ~ OF .22,06~.29 See Pages_~~~ EXE~PI"I~ OF AFFIDAVIT WITH FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ~ A P~]~F~T A~PLICATIOR RELATIVE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SAFE ~N AR~A DONATED AT TIGER"TAIL BEACH Item ~1 ~41:2 A~PLIC&TIO~ FO~ A ~RANT FRO~ THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO FROVIDK LUNCHES F~ ~, E~LADES, AND NAPLES SU~9~ER RECREATION PARTICIPANT~ See Pages /~ /--/& ~ , ~ ~ ~O. 3 (FINAL) TO TRE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WIT~ FLORIDA ~TA~'~ ~ FOR ~ PIN~ RIDGE ROAD MATER TRANSMISSION FACILITI~, A~D AUT~0RIZING THE UTILITIES AD~INISTRATOR TO ~CUT~ SAID ~'HA~E OKD~ - INCl~EASED TO $629,824.76 Item #16D2 See Pages Page Nay 12, 1992 ~ ~ JL~D SUBORDINATION OF UTILITY IRTERESTS ~OR PARCEL ~ ~~I0~) See Pages / It~ BgDG~T ~ I~'~SSARY TO PAY RgI~T FOR THE EXISTING ~~'~ ~ ~ATION - 81,321.94 A~ARD OF ~ 992-1850 FOR EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE SERVICES TO ~ DAVID ~ C~I~I'ER, INC. AND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT WITH THE DAVID LAWRENCE CENTEIt, INC. It# ,lSYl CAl~lZLITI0~ Ol~ BID ~91-1770 "ALLISON C288 HELICOPTER ]GI~ ~ CO~TRACT" Its Jl#1 ~ ~ ~ ~ &RROAL CORTRACT FOR CONSOLTING SEI~VICES I~OR U~--41 ~gl~~r-r- ~ &G~C~ PERJ~ITTING PROJECT See Pages / 7~5'" /q~ It~ .1#2 BID ~1-1772 FOR THE 'SIGN POSTING PROJECT FOR SEAGltASS IPItOT~'r~0~ SIT~' TO DOCK MASTERS MARINE CONSTRUCTION AND ISSOCIAI%~) It~ ,1#3 PURCHASE 0F PltO~ IPOR EXPANSIOR OF THE R&PLgS LARDFILL - 10 ACR.~S ~ $43,4~O/CI, O$ING COSTS ROT TO EXCEED $400 Pa,es., BID ~92-1871 TO I~ELLEY MARINE & SALVAGE, INC. FOR THE T1ULN~I~O~&TION OF MATERIAL FOR THE ARTIFICIAL REEF OFFSHORE OF GORDON It.s ~1#1 #l~t~d ~ ~ 'ID ~92-1880 FOR TH~ CONSTRUCTION OF THE VINEYARDS COMMUNITY PAKE, ~ ! - SOCCER FIELDS TO BETTER ROADS, INC., THE L(NFEST BI~, A~D APTItOVAL FOR THE CHAIRMAN TO SIGN THE ASSOCIATED CONTRACT May 12, 1992 Ite~ #16H3 ~leted R~UTION 92-280 SUPPORTING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE VANDERBILT ~ [[~N3~RI~M~T PROJECT UNDER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 161.101, FDORXD~ ~TAlq~'~S ~O~ 02-281 ~IIPPORTING APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE NAPLES/PARK ~ ~ ~~I~(ENT PROJECT UNDER PROVISIONS OF SKCTION 161.101, FLOI~X~A~T&T~I~ See Pages ~OKE ~ ~ TH~ ANNUAL AGRE~ FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SENVI~ FO~t ~ODIFICATIONS TO CHLORINATION AND EFFLUENT DISPOSAL ~ AT ~ COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER FACILITIES, PHASE I Ite~ ff16H7 WITll PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC./JAMMAL & ~(M~IATE~ DIVISION TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIALS TESTING FOR THE NAPLES PRODUCTION PARK M.S.T. & B.U. PROJECT Itst ,16J1 CliKTIFICAT~:~ Ol COKRECTION TO THE TAX ROLLS AS ~S~D ~ ~ 1990 TAX ROLL 315 05/01/92 1991 TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1991-93/96 1991 TAX ROLL 04/27/92-05/04/92 178, 181/182 ~I]l TIM~ FOR INMATE NO. 60310 04/27/92-05/01/92 Page 33 Nay 12, 1992 FOR S~I~S OF ~ ~LIC D~~ ~ See Pages ~RDENCE The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed as presented by the BCC. Page 34 Hay 12, 1992 It~ #1~ coatt~J to meeting of 5/26/92 Itea #1~1 aev~d to 9A There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: 5:10 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL MICHAEL ~ VO~L E, CHAIRMAN Page 35