CAC Agenda 02/09/2012CAC
REGULAR
MEETING
AGENDA
FEBRUARY 9, 2012
Meeting ��w��������� ����=0 0�Nm��'~�°��
N�N����N.Nmm 0�kN���mm��w� ��mm�� N����o�N����
�� �
COASTAL ADVISORY CO0@MITyEEKCAQ
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 9,2012-1:00 P.M.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAMBERS
THIRD FLOOR, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES
*Sunshine Law on Aqenda Questions
*2012 CAC MEETING DATES
I. Call 1oOrder
II. Pledge mfAllegiance
III. Roll Call
IV. Changes and Approval mfAgenda
V. Public Comments
VI' Approval of CAC Minutes
1. January 12, 2012
VII. Staff Reports
—
— Project Cost Peport
3. Collier Creek Dredging Completion Verbal Update
4. Clam Bay Marker Verbal Update
5. Vanderbilt Bathroom Verbal Update
6. RFP Engineering Consultants TDCReectinn Verbal Update
7. Structural Inspection/Repair Clam Pass Bridge
—
VIII. New Business
— ConceDtual Plan/Schedule Collier County Main Beach Renourishment
— Backup Material
Z. Marco South Revised Schedule/Permit Application
IX. Old Business
X. Announcements
1. Public Notice for 2012-2013 Category "A �Grant �Alica_tions
XI. Committee Member Discussion
XII. Next Meeting Date/Location
March O, 2O12 Government Center, 3n] Floor
XII3.Amjournmment
All interested parties are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in
writing, to the board prior to the meeting ifapplicable.
For more information, please contact Gail D. Mambrightat (239) 252-2966.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding,
you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County
pad|iUea Management Department located at 3301 EasLTamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252-8380.
Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time.
Collier County Ordinance No. 99'22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying
activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of
County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk tothe Board at the Board Minutes
and Records Department.
CAC February 9, 2012
VI -1 Approval of CAC Minutes
1 of 6
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, January 12, 2012
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Coastal Advisory
Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted
business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR
SESSION at Administrative Building "F ", 3rd Floor, Collier County
Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members
present:
CHAIRMAN: John Sorey, III
VICE CHAIRMAN: Anthony Pires
Randy Moity
Jim Burke
Murray Hendel
Robert Raymond
Joseph A. Moreland (Excused)
Victor Rios
Wayne Waldack (Excused)
ALSO PRESENT:
Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney
Gail Hambright, Accountant
Dr. Michael Bauer, City of Naples
Scott Johnson, Collier County Purchasing Department
CAC February 9, 2012
VI -1 Approval of CAC Minutes
2 of 6
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the
video recording from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations
Department or view online.
I. Call to Order
Chairman Sorey called the meeting to order at 1:00 PM
II. Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
III. Roll Call
Roll call was taken and a quorum was established.
IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda
Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management submitted the memo "2012
CAC Scheduled Meetings " for information purposes.
Mr. Rios moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Pipes. Carried unanimously
7-0.
V. Public Comments
None
VI. Approval of CAC Minutes
1. November 10, 2011
Mr. Rios moved to approve the minutes of the November 10, 2011 minutes.
Carried unanimously 7 — 0.
VII. Staff Reports
1. Expanded Revenue Report — Gary McAlpin
The Committee reviewed the "Collier County Tourist Tax Revenue FY 12 Revenue
Report" dated through December 31, 2011.
2. Project Cost Report — Gary McAlpin
The Committee reviewed the "FY 201112012 TDC Category "A: Beach
Maintenance Projects" updated through 1/5/12.
3. FDEP Naples Beach Joint Permit /Storm Water Outfall Pipes Condition
Gary McAlpin presented a copy of a letter from Robert Brantley of the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection to William Moss, City Manager, City of
Naples and Gary McAlpin, Collier County Coastal Zone Management, Re: "Naples
Beach Joint Coastal Permit No. 0222355 - 001 -JC — Stormwater Outfall Pipes
condition" dated December 21, 2011, and related Resolution from the City of
Naples. He provided an update on the County /City of Naples proposal to
"decouple" the requirement in previous FDEP permit cited above that "The County
shall submit a long range management plan (including identification of viable
funding sources) for the removal of the storm water outfalls from the beach.
CAC February 9, 2012
VI -1 Approval of CAC Minutes
3 of 6
Submittal of an acceptable plan will be a requirement of the Notice to Proceed for
the second nourishment. "
4. FDEP Clam Bay Markers Status — Update
Gary McAlpin presented a Resolution from the Pelican Bay Services Division
executed December 14, 2011 regarding the requirement for marking of Clam Bay as
provided under the 1998 FDEP permit; and a Naplesnews.com article dated January
1, 2012 "Seagate's push for Clam Bay Markers spurned by State, going to judge
next. "
He reported the proposed installation of the informational markers in the Clam Bay
waters is now subject to litigation. The Board of County Commissioners authorized
Staff to move forward with any informational signs on County lands not subject to
the litigation (beach signs, boardwalk signs, canoe launch area signs, etc.).
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney reported the Board of County
Commissioners approved the Resolution executed by the Pelican Bay Services
Division.
Speaker
Keith Dallas, Pelican Bay Services Division
5. Clam Bay Numeric Nutrient Criteria Executive Summary
Gary McAlpin presented the "Clam Bay Numeric Nutrient Criteria Executive
Summary" last revised January 11, 2012 prepared by Atkins and related backup
material. He reported the item will be considered at a future meeting.
Speakers
Kathy Worley, Conservancy of Southwest Florida
Mary Johnson, Mangrove Action Committee
6. Collier Creek Dredging — Update
Gary McAlpin provided the document "Hideaway Beach Meeting Notes —
1/11/12" regarding a meeting between County Staff, Commissioner Fiala and
representatives of the City of Marco Island and other interested parties.
He reported an issue has arisen on where the sand from the dredging activity will be
placed in relation to Hideaway Beach. The County represented in documents the
sand would be placed seaward of the erosion control line, however Hideaway Beach
District representatives were under the impression it was to be placed inland of the
erosion control line.
He outlined three options developed to address the issue on where the dredged sand
is to be placed.
Option I — Continue as currently approved by the Board of County Commissioners.
Option 2 — Demobilize the dredge and move it to Naples for two months allowing
time for the BCC to resolve the issue at a cost of $5000 to the County.
CAC February 9, 2012
VI -1 Approval of CAC Minutes
4 of 6
Option 3 — Continue the dredging activity and stockpile the 10, 000 cubic yards of
material until the issue is resolved with Hideaway Beach District paying
to distribute the sand based on a decision by the BCC.
He sought a recommendation by the Committee.
The Committee reached consensus and recommended either Option I or Option 3
be undertaken
Mr. Pires abstained from the discussion and recommendation.
7. Conceptual Design Plan and Approach to BCC in March 2012
Gary McAlpin provided a verbal update on the conceptual plan for the major beach
renourishment project. He has presented the conceptual plan to the City of Marco
Island and intends to present it to the Coastal Advisory Committee and the Board of
County Commissioners. It was noted the Tourist Development Subcommittee has
several questions on the plan and requested Staff provide a presentation on it.
Discussion occurred on the optimal timeline for the presentations of the Plan to the
various parties.
The Committee reached consensus and recommended the plan be presented in
this order, and to these parties: the CAC, TDC, City of Naples and the Board of
County Commissioners. The Committee directed Staff to answer any questions
posed by the TDC Subcommittee.
Mr. Pires abstained from the recommendation as he did not have enough
information to make an informed decision.
8. United States Department of Interior Sand Lease
Gary McAlpin provided a copy of a letter for information purposes from Steven D.
Textoris of the US Department of the Interior, received 1/10/12 at the Coastal Zone
Management Department.
VIII. New Business
1. Clam Pass Joint Coastal Permit Work Order with Atkins North America
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve
Work Order with Atkins North America, Inc. for Clam Pass Joint Coastal Permit
under contract CE- FT- 09- 5262 -CZ for a not to exceed amount of $7,672. 00 " dated
January 12, 2012 for consideration.
Mr. Pires moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve a
Work Order with Atkins North America, Inc. for Clam Pass Joint Coastal Permit
under contract CE- FT- 09- 5262 -CZ for a not to exceed amount of $7,672.00."
Second by Mr. Hendel. Carried unanimously 7— 0.
CAC February 9, 2012
VI -1 Approval of CAC Minutes
5 of 6
2. Marco Laser Grading
Gary McAlpin presented Schedule A, Work Order No. I for CEC Contract No. 09-
5262 for Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc. to assist the County in establishing a
long term maintenance program to reshape the beach on Marco Island from
monument R -135 to R -143. The Work Order is a time and materials scope of work
at a cost not to exceed $35,190.00.
Mr. Rios moved to approve Schedule A, Work Order No. 1 "for CEC Contract
No. 09 -5262 for Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc is at a cost not to exceed
$35,190.00. Second by Mr. Moity. Motion carried 6 "yes" — I "no. " Mr. Hendel
voted "no. "
Chairman Sorey stated the approval is subject to Staff contacting the necessary
governing agencies in an attempt to streamline the permitprocess.
3. RFP No. 11 -5772 "Beach Renourishment Engineering Services"
Gary McAlpin presented the Executive Summary "Recommendation to approve
shortlist of firms for contract negotiations for RFP #11 -5772 Beach Renourishment
Engineering Services " dated January 12, 2012.
He reported Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the
Committee's selection of firms and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations
with the number one shortlisted firm, Coastal Planning and Engineering, Inc.
Mr. Hendel moved to approve Staffs recommendation listed above. Second by
Mr. Burke. Motion carried 5 "yes" — 2 "no." Mr. Pires and Mr. Moity voted
"no. "
IX. Old Business
Gary McAlpin reported the Vanderbilt Beach Restroom project is still in the
permitting process.
X. Announcements
Gary McAlpin reported Dr. Bauer has been appointed to the Environmental
Regulation Commission.
XI. Committee Member Discussion
1. Wiggins Pass Channel Straightening — Update
Gary McAlpin reported the next meeting of the Wiggins Pass Subcommittee will be
held on January 18, 2012.
XII. Next Meeting Date /Location
February 9, 2012 — Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor
CAC February 9, 2012
VI -1 Approval of CAC Minutes
6 of 6
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the chair at 2:31 P.M.
Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee
John Sorey, III, Chairman
These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on
as presented or as amended
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
1 of 18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX REVENUE
FY 12 Revenue Report
31- .Ian -9012
Budget
5 Yr Collect
5 Yr Collect
Budgeted
Actual
Month
History-Cum
Histo - Monthly
Collections
Collections
IFY
FY 12 Net
3.4%
3.4%
Fund
FY 12 Current
12 Forecast
FY 12 (5 %)
Budget
8.0%
4.6%
183
2,153,300
2,153,300
(107,700)
2,045,600
13.8%
5.9%
184
3,262,500
3,262,500
(164,100)
3,098,400
22.0%
8.2%
193
310,900
310,900
(15,500)
295,400
34.8%
12.8%
194
1,516,100
1,516,100
(75,800)
1,440,300
50.6%
15.8%
195
4,371,800
4,371,800
(218,600)
4,153,200
68.8%
18.2%
196
0
0
0
79.2%
10.3%
198
1,435,500
1,435,500
(71,800)
1,363,700
85.3%
6.2%
Gross Budget
$13,050,100
$13,050,100
- $653,500
$12,396,600
90.4%
5.0%
Less 5% Rev Res
(653,500)
n/a
Aug
95.5%
5.2%
Net Budget
12,396,600
n/a
Set
100.0%
Collections
580,844
0
n/a
Total
100.0%
100.0%
13,050,100
3,350,329
Budget
Tourist Tax Revenue
I
Collected to
% aver FY 11
% over FY 10
% over FY 09
Month
Actual FY 12
Cum YTD
Date
collections
collections
collections
Oct
525,334
525,334
4.026%
9.71%
18.07%
31.38%
Nov
691,705
1,217,039
9.326%
10.65%
26.46%
11.70%
Dec
924,729
2,141,768
16.412%
23.29%
24.11%
15.79%
Jan
1,208,561
3,350,329
25.673%
19.69%
14.27%
7.17%
Feb
3,350,329
25.673%
....._
____....._.._
Mar
0.0 L. ...........
3,350,329
25.673%
I
Apr
3,350,329
25.673%
May
3,350,329
25.673%
June
3,350,329
25.673%
July
3,350,329
25.673%
Aug
3,350,329
25.673%
Sept
3,350,329
25.673%
Total
3,350,329
3,350,329
17%
20%
14%
Bal to Collect
10,012,912
Budget Comparison
5 Yr Collect
5 Yr Collect
Budgeted
Actual
Month
History-Cum
Histo - Monthly
Collections
Collections
Variance
Oct
3.4%
3.4%
441,513
525,334
83,821
Nov
8.0%
4.6%
597,184
691,705
94,521
Dec
13.8%
5.9%
765,938
924,729
158,791
Jan
22.0%
8.2%
1,063,785
1,208,561
144,776
Feb
34.8%
12.8%
1,676,256
0
n/a
Mar
50.6%
15.8%
2,063,999
0
n/a
Apr
68.8%
18.2%
2,376,287
0
n/a
May
79.2%
10.3%
1,348,215
0
n/a
June
85.3%
6.2%
804,559
0
n/a
July
90.4%
5.0%
653,390
0
n/a
Aug
95.5%
5.2%
678,131
0
n/a
Set
100.0%
4.5%
580,844
0
n/a
Total
100.0%
100.0%
13,050,100
3,350,329
481,909
Tourist Tax Revenue
I
$2.5
0
f
i
9
e
- Budgeted,
-Actual
$0.5 i .__.
__. _......... -__.
....._
____....._.._
0.0 L. ...........
I
Ob �pJ Oe la0 X2`0
2/1/20124:01 PM H' \Revenue ReporhMonthly Gas, Sales, and TDC Receipts
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
2of18
BED320RD
02/01/2012
COLLIER
COUNTY
TOURIST TAX - YTD
REPORT
BY CITY
PAGE
1
**
NAPLES **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
124889
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
171672
257204
310088
863853
**
MARCO ISLAND **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
142329
171194
201691
244744
759958
**
IMMOKALEE **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
528
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
489
863
1067
2947
**
EVERGLADES CITY **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
4057
5607
7144
9161
25969
**
COLLIER COUNTY **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
253531
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
342743
457827
643501
1697602
**
OTHER **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**
TOTALS **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
525334
691705
924729
1208561
3350329
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
3of18
BED330RD
02/01/2012
COLLIER
COUNTY
TOURIST TAX - YTD REPORT
BY
ACCOUNT TYPE
PAGE
1
**
APARTMENT **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
896
435
1497
863
3691
-----------------------------------------------------------------
**
CONDOMINIUM **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
39952
21515
41082
82486
185035
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**
CAMPGROUND /RV /PARK
**
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
1892
3546
5271
11540
22249
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**
HOTEL /MOTEL **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
410547
599695
765114
796797
2572153
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**
INTERVAL **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
4990
7843
11914
14375
39122
------------------------------------------------------------------
**
MOBILE HOME PARK **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
228
517
543
1455
2743
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**
SINGLE FAMILY **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
45283
13154
22328
52088
132853
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**
REALTOR **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
21546
45000
76980
248957
392483
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**
OTHER **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
------------------------------------------------------
**
TOTALS **
OCT
NOV
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
TOTALS
525334
691705
924729
1208561
3350329
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
4of18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
NAPLES
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
ANJ UARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$76,843
$149,990
$236,963
$316,250
$512,938
$580,227
$570,569
$334,191
$217,611
$152,642
$175,256
$127,802
$3,451,282
2006/2007
$111,854
$151,746
$217,262
$291,277
$532,706
$589,595
$640,395
$340,926
$205,947
$156,476
$174,238
$145,286
$3,557,708
2007/2008
$122,094
$174,235
$231,470
$306,731
$564,747
$617,010
$664,907
$330,698
$233,938
$145,532
$172,641
$150,743
$3,714,746
2008/2009
$105,937
$154,246
$209,703
$298,657
$500,986
$528,321
$471,924
$327,310
$179,344
$133,913
$159,039
$120,786
$3,190,166
2009/2010
$102,425
$147,706
$202,271
$304,284
$473,406
$536,310
$578,659
$314,492
$192,256
$129,009
$150,982
$123,268
$3,255,068
2010/2011
$107,247
$144,923
$207,947
$296,553
$469,260
$537,127
$620,402
$342,016
$210,346
$150,143
$191,212
$144,535
$3,421,711
2011/2012
$124,889
$171,672
$257,204
$310,088
$863,853
TOTAL:
$751,289
$1,094,518
$1,562,820
$2,123,840
$3,054,043
$3,388,590
$3,546,856
$1,989,633
$1,239,442
$867,715
$1,023,368
$812,420
$21,454,534
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
5of18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
MARCO ISLAND
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLYTOTALS
2005/2006
$71,763
$112,414
$147,512
$199,030
$344,074
$525,468
$576,530
$374,000
$261,791
$218,203
$208,955
$150,041
$3,189,781
2006/2007
$73,397
$88,576
$141,951
$189,026
$335,898
$517,149
$595,449
$379,673
$225,816
$216,858
$194,291
$183,007
$3,141,091
2007/2008
$165,745
$166,397
$93,819
$321,400
$408,079
$503,575
$666,564
$507,602
$140,088
$322,017
$245,721
$151,743
$3,692,750
2008/2009
$99,516
$168,129
$185,986
$280,663
$372,230
$457,015
$473,292
$324,558
$204,748
$183,654
$186,855
$210,702
$3,147,348
2009/2010
$124,837
$158,522
$168,816
$229,316
$364,347
$466,758
$550,969
$361,520
$197,005
$167,786
$223,954
$215,814
$3,229,644
2010/2011
$149,854
$169,786
$175,540
$198,803
$307,625
$416,029
$571,019
$363,648
$210,320
$192,412
$210,599
$230,248
$3,195,883
20/11/2012
$142,329
$171,194
$201,691
$244,744
$759,958
TOTAL:
$827,441
$1,035,018
$1,115,315
$1,662,982
$2,132,253
$2,885,994
$3,433,823
$2,311,001
$1,239,768
$1,300,930
$1,270,375
$1,141,555
$20,356,455
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
6of18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
I M M OKALEE
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$842
$1,151
$1,306
$1,450
$1,683
$1,837
$2,050
$1,786
$1,900
$1,774
$1,602
$1,372
$18,753
2006/2007
$1,306
$1,258
$1,837
$1,447
$2,307
$1,932
$1,982
$1,691
$1,466
$504
$786
$1,159
$17,675
2007/2008
$731
$746
$776
$966
$749
$828
$2,806
$1,501
$887
$650
$488
$530
$11,658
2008/2009
$410
$553
$686
$687
$808
$1,137
$952
$944
$618
$723
$671
$468
$8,657
2009/2010
$676
$624
$558
$754
$633
$912
$580
$596
$541
$965
$670
$663
$8,172
2010/2011
$625
$470
$639
$649
$649
$768
$928
$937
$440
$990
$517
$667
$8,279
2011/2012
$528
$489
$863
$1,067
$2,947
TOTAL:
$5,118
$5,291
$6,665
$7,020
$6,829
$7,414
$9,298
$7,455
$5,852
$5,606
$4,734
$4,859
$76,141
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
7of18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
EVERGLADES CITY
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$2,246
$3,922
$4,783
$6,921
$9,386
$15,217
$14,334
$13,423
$7,670
$3,754
$4,162
$3,331
$89,149
2006/2007
$4,678
$5,602
$5,705
$9,961
$12,884
$14,766
$16,860
$14,152
$8,653
$3,929
$4,101
$3,677
$104,968
2007/2008
$4,018
$5,424
$6,879
$9,724
$11,917
$16,032
$15,800
$11,327
$11,881
$4,136
$4,136
$3,481
$104,755
2008/2009
$3,443
$4,975
$7,186
$8,987
$11,486
$15,137
$15,206
$10,315
$5,932
$3,302
$3,729
$3,447
$93,145
2009/2010
$3,783
$4,473
$5,706
$8,704
$12,423
$15,656
$18,852
$10,467
$6,149
$3,705
$4,019
$3,055
$96,992
2010/2011
$3,270
$5,011
$6,326
$7,626
$10,020
$13,210
$17,210
$10,847
$6,870
$4,054
$5,237
$5,113
$94,794
2011/2012
$4,057
$5,607
$7,144
$9,161
$25,969
TOTAL:
$25,495
$35,014
$43,729
$61,084
$68,116
$90,018
$98,262
$70,531
$47,155
$22,880
$25,384
$22,104
$609,772
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
8of18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
COLLIER COUNTY
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$86,479
$255,807
$446,229
$534,560
$867,498
$1,119,215
$1,277,646
$777,494
$465,272
$357,870
$335,272
$262,452
$6,785,794
2006/2007
$245,217
$358,486
$492,296
$564,991
$952,204
$1,215,359
$1,354,022
$765,087
$465,420
$368,234
$336,767
$289,157
$7,407,240
2007/2008
$233,050
$342,484
$467,648
$602,044
$937,713
$1,172,727
$1,363,500
$726,065
$479,408
$332,957
$334,056
$280,120
$7,271,772
2008/2009
$190,563
$291,340
$395,097
$538,743
$749,012
$973,781
$1,060,618
$566,718
$358,045
$258,429
$289,170
$234,304
$5,905,820
2009/2010
$213,228
$235,663
$367,743
$514,622
$827,789
$1,013,235
$1,256,966
$636,092
$393,674
$282,867
$289,743
$235,133
$6,266,755
2010/2011
$217,861
$304,930
$359,617
$506,087
$813,768
$1,058,980
$1,357,406
$639,303
$422,707
$332,170
$323,179
$259,566
$6,595,574
2011/2012
$253,531
$342,743
$457,827
$643,501
$1,697,602
TOTAL:
$1,439,929
$2,131,453
$2,986,457
$3,904,548
$5,147,984
$6,553,297
$7,670,158
$4,110,759
$2,584,526
$1,932,527
$1,908,187
$1,560,732
$41,930,557
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
9of18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
TOTALS
NAPLES. MARCO ISLAND. IMMOKALEE. EVERGLADES CITY. COLLIER COUNTY
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLYTOTALS
2005/2006
$238,173
$523,284
$836,793
$1,058,211
$1,735,579
$2,241,964
$2,441,129
$1,500,894
$954,244
$734,243
$725,247
$544,998
$13,534,759
2006/2007
$436,452
$605,668
$859,051
$1,056,702
$1,835,999
$2,338,801
$2,608,708
$1,501,529
$907,302
$746,001
$710,183
$622,286
$14,228,682
2007/2008
$525,638
$689,286
$800,592
$1,240,865
$1,923,205
$2,310,172
$2,713,577
$1,577,193
$866,202
$805,292
$757,042
$586,617
$14,795,681
2008/2009
$399,869
$619,243
$798,658
$1,127,737
$1,634,522
$1,975,391
$2,021,992
$1,229,845
$748,687
$580,021
$639,464
$569,707
$12,345,136
2009/2010
$444,949
$546,988
$745,094
$1,057,680
$1,678,598
$2,032,871
$2,406,026
$1,323,167
$789,625
$584,332
$669,368
$577,933
$12,856,631
2010/2011
$478,857
$625,120
$750,069
$1,009,718
$1,601,322
$2,026,114
$2,566,965
$1,356,751
$850,683
$679,769
$730,744
$640,129
$13,316,241
2011/2012
$525,334
$691,705
$924,729
$1,208,561
$3,350,329
TOTAL:
$3,049,272
$4,301,294
$5,714,986
$7,759,474
$10,409,225
$12,925,313
$14,758,397
$8,489,379
$5,116,743
$4,129,658
$4,232,048
$3,541,670
$84,427,459
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
10 of 18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
APARTMENT
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$1,466
$198
$874
$1,987
$3,447
$6,076
$10,463
$1,504
$4,446
$1,740
$179
$29
$32,409
2006/2007
$2,403
$320
$1,387
$2,519
$3,479
$4,476
$7,976
$1,601
$624
$692
$1,447
$284
$27,208
2007/2008
$296
$2,797
$964
$2,770
$6,901
$4,396
$5,539
$2,817
$587
$1,045
$176
$158
$28,446
2008/2009
$675
$111
$1,162
$1,700
$3,571
$4,192
$7,489
$1,210
$710
$349
$63
$41
$21,273
2009/2010
$367
$165
$947
$2,776
$3,910
$4,729
$6,041
$2,607
$1,350
$799
$133
$150
$23,974
2010/2011
$1,113
$260
$1,018
$2,495
$4,802
$5,119
$4,555
$3,300
$2,706
$879
$140
$133
$26,520
2011/2012
$896
$435
$1,497
$863
$3,691
TOTAL:
$7,216
$4,286
$7,849
$15,110
$26,110
$28,988
$42,063
$13,039
$10,423
$5,504
$2,138
$795
$163,521
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
11 of 18
COLLIER
COUNTY TOURIST TAX
CONDOMINIUM
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$18,115
$9,286
$24,892
$46,267
$62,578
$172,726
$290,466
$55,985
$24,142
$17,905
$14,052
$10,670
$747,084
2006/2007
$17,081
$12,475
$21,751
$61,089
$79,540
$188,992
$323,240
$57,775
$23,138
$20,648
$14,595
$19,893
$840,217
2007/2008
$26,279
$14,948
$26,623
$60,871
$114,344
$203,054
$362,939
$60,403
$34,262
$19,440
$17,944
$15,076
$956,183
2008/2009
$18,344
$13,399
$23,789
$52,809
$91,805
$192,617
$347,817
$58,346
$23,642
$19,728
$12,954
$10,983
$866,233
2009/2010
$19,477
$14,463
$32,182
$63,689
$67,669
$240,487
$412,028
$65,444
$26,234
$23,042
$50,203
$55,623
$1,070,541
2010/2011
$84,551
$18,112
$30,208
$63,785
$91,669
$231,388
$462,079
$56,684
$32,886
$37,981
$18,278
$15,431
$1,143,052
2011/2012
$39,952
$21,515
$41,082
$82,486
$185,035
TOTAL:
$223,799
$104,198
$200,527
$430,996
$507,605
$1,229,264
$2,198,569
$354,637
$164,304
$138,744
$128,026
$127,676
$5,808,345
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
12 of 18
COLLIER
COUNTY TOURIST TAX
CAMPGROUND -RV -PARK
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$2,009
$2,462
$6,622
$17,116
$21,543
$30,174
$33,024
$11,607
$5,331
$3,474
$3,313
$3,135
$139,810
2006/2007
$3,579
$4,746
$11,676
$11,640
$20,946
$27,551
$38,732
$9,843
$5,634
$2,542
$2,679
$2,917
$142,485
2007/2008
$2,813
$3,141
$5,568
$14,015
$22,010
$27,176
$32,516
$13,625
$3,740
$3,059
$2,716
$2,530
$132,909
2008/2009
$2,648
$3,212
$4,849
$13,465
$39,031
$26,499
$40,324
$8,261
$3,491
$2,910
$1,959
$1,859
$148,508
2009/2010
$2,494
$2,999
$5,825
$13,772
$21,117
$30,227
$41,973
$7,260
$3,551
$1,501
$3,616
$1,954
$136,289
2010/2011
$1,903
$3,102
$5,296
$14,095
$18,919
$25,457
$42,028
$7,013
$3,961
$1,735
$3,441
$2,802
$129,752
2011/2012
$1,892
$3,546
$5,271
$11,540
$22,249
TOTAL:
$17,338
$23,208
$45,107
$95,643
$143,566
$167,084
$228,597
$57,609
$25,708
$15,221
$17,724
$15,197
$852,002
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
13 of 18
COLLIER
COUNTY TOURIST TAX
HOTEL -MOTEL
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$284,057
$467,480
$720,774
$761,245
$1,112,751
$1,512,646
$1,716,480
$1,253,822
$855,707
$647,441
$626,697
$488,099
$10,447,199
2006/2007
$371,144
$531,060
$735,510
$744,056
$1,163,479
$1,582,476
$1,772,635
$1,282,854
$829,704
$641,921
$614,936
$533,317
$10,803,092
2007/2008
$450,926
$600,629
$663,134
$899,608
$1,210,928
$1,557,503
$1,811,406
$1,370,272
$738,197
$715,412
$647,247
$503,218
$11,168,480
2008/2009
$326,143
$547,238
$683,525
$804,914
$926,626
$1,244,914
$1,240,850
$1,012,168
$653,733
$484,556
$539,652
$482,466
$8,946,785
2009/2010
$367,978
$469,435
$611,459
$712,102
$1,010,110
$1,243,041
$1,434,996
$1,081,251
$698,121
$477,576
$532,222
$454,761
$9,093,052
2010/2011
$333,456
$555,623
$619,659
$684,174
$953,504
$1,315,029
$1,587,010
$1,132,637
$737,285
$567,319
$611,275
$569,446
$9,666,417
2011/2012
$410,547
$599,695
$765,114
$796,797
$2,572,153
TOTAL:
$2,544,251
$3,771,160
$4,799,175
$5,402,896
$6,377,398
$8,455,609
$9,563,377
$7,133,004
$4,512,747
$3,534,225
$3,572,029
$3,031,307
$62,697,178
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
14 of 18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
INTERVAL
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$865
$2,254
$3,617
$4,037
$7,099
$8,669
$15,490
$9,765
$8,182
$4,710
$7,116
$5,100
$76,904
2006/2007
$2,028
$3,691
$9,886
$10,092
$19,130
$24,221
$26,340
$17,397
$9,043
$6,290
$12,221
$6,099
$146,438
2007/2008
$6,597
$7,295
$10,353
$10,716
$20,438
$19,074
$20,960
$13,613
$7,614
$7,215
$7,767
$6,333
$137,975
2008/2009
$4,897
$5,623
$7,807
$10,438
$14,909
$13,650
$20,868
$21,687
$10,080
$11,449
$13,356
$13,307
$148,071
2009/2010
$10,156
$9,509
$13,274
$20,198
$17,462
$28,801
$34,980
$31,383
$12,115
$19,999
$15,197
$9,839
$222,913
2010/2011
$7,444
$5,816
$13,426
$18,029
$17,347
$22,275
$27,152
$28,303
$16,540
$6,406
$14,542
$9,450
$186,730
2011/2012
$4,990
$7,843
$11,914
$14,375
$39,122
TOTAL:
$36,977
$42,031
$70,277
$87,885
$96,385
$116,690
$145,790
$122,148
$63,574
$56,069
$70,199
$50,128
$958,153
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
15 of 18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
MOBILE HOME PARK
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$26
$312
$554
$517
$129
$779
$2,399
$45
$51
$89
$14
$2
$4,917
2006/2007
$3,093
$482
$203
$620
$1,110
$2,831
$2,017
$700
$828
$133
$160
$170
$12,347
2007/2008
$172
$288
$768
$1,444
$3,492
$1,941
$4,349
$557
$218
$461
$348
$450
$14,488
2008/2009
$43
$162
$1,057
$1,229
$1,982
$3,139
$4,012
$1,175
$702
$228
$249
$194
$14,172
2009/2010
$438
$746
$974
$1,688
$2,479
$1,940
$5,061
$2,170
$911
$516
$292
$464
$17,679
2010/2011
$352
$705
$1,477
$2,940
$3,895
$4,309
$5,743
$1,692
$879
$312
$266
$257
$22,827
2011/2012
$228
$517
$543
$1,455
$2,743
TOTAL:
$4,352
$3,212
$5,576
$9,893
$13,087
$14,939
$23,581
$6,339
$3,589
$1,739
$1,329
$1,537
$89,173
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
16 of 18
COLLIER
COUNTY TOURIST TAX
SINGLE FAMILY
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLYTOTALS
2005/2006
$9,710
$3,439
$4,409
$18,100
$17,773
$24,067
$52,042
$15,400
$5,945
$9,955
$6,729
$3,319
$170,888
2006/2007
$13,559
$4,549
$6,049
$20,838
$14,666
$23,955
$67,207
$13,573
$6,254
$16,936
$7,301
$8,453
$203,340
2007/2008
$17,673
$7,136
$12,482
$27,895
$15,617
$22,793
$82,815
$18,577
$11,121
$19,502
$8,797
$10,929
$255,337
2008/2009
$17,263
$11,147
$10,098
$33,205
$16,416
$33,371
$97,716
$19,903
$11,470
$23,375
$12,173
$9,587
$295,724
2009/2010
$24,226
$7,933
$12,349
$33,206
$16,749
$41,749
$113,111
$20,584
$9,537
$23,926
$12,516
$17,674
$333,560
2010/2011
$31,981
$9,989
$12,618
$39,011
$20,626
$40,342
$126,367
$27,892
$12,448
$28,622
$20,527
$9,345
$379,768
2011/2011
$45,283
$13,154
$22,328
$52,088
$132,853
TOTAL:
$159,695
$57,347
$80,333
$224,343
$101,847
$186,277
$539,258
$115,929
$56,775
$122,316
$68,043
$59,307
$1,771,470
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
17 of 18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
REALTOR
FISCAL YEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$21,925
$37,853
$75,051
$208,942
$510,259
$486,827
$320,765
$152,766
$50,440
$48,929
$67,147
$34,644
$2,015,548
2006/2007
$23,565
$48,345
$72,589
$205,848
$533,649
$484,299
$370,561
$117,786
$32,077
$56,839
$56,844
$51,153
$2,053,555
2007/2008
$20,882
$53,052
$80,700
$223,546
$529,475
$474,235
$393,053
$97,329
$70,463
$39,158
$72,047
$47,923
$2,101,863
2008/2009
$29,856
$38,351
$66,371
$209,977
$540,182
$457,009
$262,916
$107,095
$44,859
$37,426
$59,058
$51,270
$1,904,370
2009/2010
$19,813
$41,738
$68,084
$210,249
$539,102
$441,771
$357,570
$112,468
$37,806
$36,973
$55,189
$37,468
$1,958,231
2010/2011
$18,057
$31,513
$66,367
$185,189
$490,560
$382,195
$312,031
$99,230
$43,978
$36,515
$62,275
$33,265
$1,761,175
2011/2012
$21,546
$45,000
$76,980
$248,957
$392,483
TOTAL:
$155,644
$295,852
$506,142
$1,492,708
$3,143,227
$2,726,336
$2,016,896
$686,674
$279,623
$255,840
$372,560
$255,723
$12,187,225
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -1 Staff Reports
18 of 18
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST TAX
TOTALS
APARTMENTS. CONDOMINIUM. CAMPGROUD /RV /PARK. HOTEL /MOTEL. INTERVAL. MOBILE HOME PARK, SINGLE FAILY. REALTOR
FISCALYEAR
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
YEARLY TOTALS
2005/2006
$38,173
$523,284
$836,793
$1,058,211
$1,735,579
$2,241,964
$2,441,129
$1,500,894
$954,244
$734,243
$725,247
$544,998
$13,334,759
2006/2007
$436,452
$605,668
$859,051
$1,056,702
$1,835,999
$2,338,801
$2,608,708
$1,501,529
$907,302
$746,001
$710,183
$622,286
$14,228,682
2007/2008
$525,638
$689,286
$800,592
$1,240,865
$1,923,205
$2,310,172
$2,713,577
$1,577,193
$866,202
$805,292
$757,042
$586,617
$14,795,681
2008/2009
$399,869
$619,243
$798,658
$1,127,737
$1,634,522
$1,975,391
$2,021,992
$1,229,845
$748,687
$580,021
$639,464
$569,707
$12,345,136
2009/2010
$444,949
$546,988
$745,094
$1,057,680
$1,678,598
$2,032,871
$2,406,026
$1,323,167
$789,625
$584,332
$669,368
$577,933
$12,856,631
2010/2011
$478,857
$625,120
$750,069
$1,009,718
$1,601,322
$2,026,114
$2,566,965
$1,356,751
$850,683
$679,769
$730,744
$640,129
$13,316,241
2011/2012
$525,334
$691,705
$924,729
$1,208,561
$3,350,329
TOTAL:
$2,849,272
$4,301,294
$5,714,986
$7,759,474
$10,409,225
$12,925,313
$14,758,397
$8,489,379
$5,116,743
$4,129,658
$4,232,048
$3,541,670
$84,227,459
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -2 Staff Reports
1 of 3
FY 2011 /2012
TDC Category "A" Beach Maintenance Projects
Updated 2/1112 from Financeal Program SAP
Current Fiscal
Balance
Actual
Balance in
Estimated Project
Fiscal Notes
Comments
Fund
project No.
Project
Original Project
Year Amendment
Remaining in
Expenditures
Budget
Cost
Budget
Budget
WO /PO
195
70005
Breakwaters &
$ 320,983.30
$ 320,983.30
$ 320,982.30
Jettie
195
80093
Wiggins Pass
$ 79,489.18
$
$ 79,489.18
$ 79,459.18
Master
195
80096
FY 13 Beach
$ 600,000.00
$ 740,000.35
$
$ 740,000.35
$ 740,000.35
Analysis Design
City of Marco Island
195
80097
Hideaway Erosion
$ 121,309.57
$ 121,309.57
$ -
$ 121,309.57
(45- 124323)
$121,309.57
CEC
195
80123
Marco Breakwater
$ 25,923.80
$ -
$ 25,752.30
$ 171.50
$ 25,923.80
(45- 119725)
$200,000
195
80125
Naples Drainage
$ 17,954.41
$
$ 17,954.41
$ 17,954.41
Designe
195
80165
County Beach
$ 145,961.21
$
$ 15,555.25
$ 130,405.96
$ 145,961.21
CP &E
$15,559.46 (45- 123777)
Analysis
195
80171
Beach Tilling
$ 17,500.00
$ 17,500.00
$ 17,500.00
$ 17,500.00
195
80203
Laser Grading N.
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
Marco
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -2 Staff Reports
2 of 3
Fund
Project
Original Project
Current Fiscal
Balance
Actual
Balance in
Estimated Project
Fiscal Notes
Project No.
Budget
Year Amendment
Remaining in
Expenditures
Budget
Cost
Comments
Budget
WO /PO
195
88030
N. Truck Haul
$ 350,000.00
$ 794,298.04
$ 794,298.04
$ 794,298.04
Renourishment
195
90060
Clam Pass Ebb
$ 72,389.04
$ 7,672.00
$ 42,530.30
$ 22,186.74
$ 72,389.04
PBSJ -FT- 4153 -01 @
Tide Shoal Study
$50,676.25 (45- 100227)
Beach Cleaning grant to the
195
90021
City Beach
$ 77,480.00
$ -
$ 75,850.00
$ 1,630.00
$ 77,480.00
Cit y p of Naples $75,850
City of Naples
Cleaning
(45- 124322)
195
90032
Wiggins Pass
$ 88,377.75
$ 40,481.25
$ 47,896.50
$
$ 88,377.75
CP &E
Modeling
(45- 128747) $88,377.75
Near Shore
Scuba Adventure Equip.
Yearly Biological Monitoring
Hardbottom
West Marine
Returning (150,000) to
195
90033
Monitoring &
$ 30,000.00
$ 90,786.97
$ 2,581.70
$ -
$ 88,205.27
$ 90,786.97
Captain Eric
reserves
Artifical Reef
Sunshine Ace Hardware
195
90041
Doctor's Pass Jetty
$ 111,010.16
$ -
$ 111,010.16
$ 111,010.16
Rebuild
195
90044
Vegetation Repairs
$ 75,000.00
$ 66,880.00
$ 43,000.00
$ 2,280.00
$ 21,600.00
$ 119,880.00
Earth Balance
$75,000 Yearly
Exotic Removal
$43,000 (45- 127055)
195
90096
Naples Pier
$ 55,000.00
$ 110,000.00
$ 55,000.00
$ 55,000.00
$ -
$ 110,000.00
City of Naples Grant @ $55,000.
City of Naples Grant
Annualized Repair
(45- 114035)
195
90522
Wiggins Pass
Dredging
$ 50,000.00
$ 57,064.84
$ -
$ 57,064.84
$ 57,064.84
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -2 Staff Reports
3of3
Fund
Project
Original Project
Current Fiscal
Balance
Actual
Balance in
Estimated Project
Fiscal Notes
Project No.
Budget
Year Amendment
Remaining in
Expenditures
Budget
Cost
Comments
Budget
WO /PO
Earth Balance
Cecils Copy
Sunshine Ace Hardware
Yearly Grant for beach
195
90533
Beach Cleaning
$ 135,000.00
$ 287,629.01
$ 8,628.39
$ 18,421.99
$ 260,578.63
$ 287,629.01
World Waste Services, Inc.
cleaning Collier County
Operations (P &R)
Welsh Companies
Safety Products
Vic's Boots
195
90536
County /Naples
Beach Monitoring
$ 260,000.00
$ 519,065.97
$ 109,295.97
$ 83,137.50
$ 326,632.50
$ 519,065.97
H &M
Yearly Physical Monitoring
(45- 128299) $183,367.50
TOTALS
$ 1,592,500.00
$ 3,764,103.60
$ 387,968.88
$ 366,423.84
$ 3,009,710.88
$ 3,817,102.60
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 Staff Reports
1 of 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to authorize structural pilings inspection and bridge repairs to the Clam Pass
Draw Bridge and approve a budget of $72,500 to complete this work.
OBJECTIVE: To inspect the structural pilings and repair the Clam Pass Draw Bridge.
CONSIDERATIONS: Annual inspection of the Clam Pass Draw Bridge has identified additional
structural inspections and maintenance activities that need to be performed. Authorization of this item
will allow staff to proceed with the inspection and repairs listed below. Work will be accomplished by
utilizing a combination of Collier County maintenance staff and approved general contractors currently
under contract with the County. Details are attached as backup.
Description of work
Estimated Budget
Engineering & Permitting Mechanical Lift
$ 5,000.00
Bridge Repairs (Braces, Blocks & Anchor Clips)
$25,000.00
Perform Submerged Piling Inspection with Structural Engineer
$15,000.00
Un -tor ue Bridge Lift Span
$ 7,500.00
Replace Electrical Lift Mechanism with Mechanical lift Unit
$10,000.00
Replace Gates /Hardware and Apply Seal Coat Protection
$10,000.00
TOTAL
$72,500.00
This item does not include any piling repairs that may result from the submerged piling inspection. The
project management of this project will be expedited through the combined services of the facility
management department and the coastal zone management department.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this project will be from Tourist Development Tax; Fund 183- Beach
Park Facilities. No additional carrying costs, operating or additional maintenance costs are expected with
approval of this work. Using today's dollars, the total cost to replace this asset is in excess of $1M. This
is a maintenance project and as such, subject to 100% annual depreciation.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to
this action.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: This item will go to the Parks & Recreation
Advisory Board (PARAB) on February 15, 2012 and to the TDC on February 27, 2012 for approval.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office,
requires majority vote, and is legally sufficient for Board action. —
RECOMMENDATION: To authorize structural pilings inspection and bridge repairs to the Clam Pass
Draw Bridge and approve a budget of $72,500 to complete this work.
PREPARED BY: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Director, Coastal Zone Management Department
Cronin Engineering, Inc.
6627 Willow Park Drive
Naples, FL 34109
Phone: (239) 593 -2157
April 5, 2011
Collier County Coastal Zone Management
Collier County Government
3229 Tamiami Trail E
Naples, Fl. 34112
Re: Clam Pass Park Bridge
Clam Pass Park
Naples, Fl. 34102
Gary McAlpin
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
1 of 15
Fax: (239) 593 -8820
OVERVIEW AND LIMITS ONE INSPECTION /REPORT
Cronin Engineering, Inc. conducted an inspection of the above wood
tramway /walkway on March 22, 2011. Collier County Coastal Management provided
nautical transportation to the tramway to evaluate the existing condition of the wood
framing of the tramway. We have not conducted a structural analysis of the tramway at
this point in time.
VISUAL AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OBSERVATIONS
A visual inspection of the wood framing and hardware of the tramway was
conducted. The existing wood framing is approximately 10 years old. Below is a list of
the bridge /tramway structural components and the assessed condition.
1. The vertical columns supporting the tramway were pressure treated wood piles.
Due to the apparent high grade of pressure treatment of the piles that was visible
to the naked eye and physically tested with a knife were found to be in decent
condition. See attached photo's numbers 1 -2 on page 3.
2. In the drawbridge area the 4 x 14 pt board knee brace appeared to be in good
condition and structurally sound. These members are showing signs of weathering
which is common for exterior wood members. The 6 x 6 p.t. members attaching
the knee bracing to the 4 x 14 p.t. cross support member appeared to be in good
condition and structurally sound. The 3/4" HDG(hot- dipped galvanized} bolts
with flat washers and nuts were found to be loose due to the lack of lock nuts and
the constant vibration of vehicle and foot traffic. See attached photo's numbers 3-
7 on pages 4 -6.
3. The 3 x 8 p.t members on the west side of the drawbridge waterway were found
to be easily penetrated with a knife and appeared to have some degree of rot. See
attached photos number #8 on page 6.
4. 4 x 4 p.t. post attaching the tramway beams to the support beams has a split. See
attached photo number 99 on page 7.
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
2of15
5. The 4 x 14 p.t. board beams that support the tramway appear to be in good
condition and structurally sound. See attached photo number 49 on page 7.
6. The p.t. cross- bracing members between the piles appear to be in good condition
with the exception on the span on the west side of the drawbridge area. Splitting
has occurred where they are attached to south piling. See attached photo number
410 on page 7.
7. The (4) 6" x 6" x 3/8" angle steel connecting the top portion each of the p.t. knee
braces appears to be in good condition. See attached photo number #11 on page 8.
CONCLUSIONS
The existing bridge /tramway wood members appear to be in decent condition for
their age. We only require the replacement of the following:
1, All the existing steel hardware such as bolts, nuts, flat washers
should be replaced with HDG (hot - dipped galvanized) bolts, nuts
and flat washers. Recommend adding I IDG lock washers to each
of the bolts, nuts, and flat washers.
2. Replace the steel angle clips at the top of the knee braces with one
steel angle clip with (3) 3/4" x 8" HDG bolts, nuts, lock washers and
flat washers at the top and side attachment points.
3. Replace split cross bracing and add blocking to middle of cross
bracing and attach with 3/4" x 12" HDG bolt, nut, lock washer and
flat washer.
4. Replace all 3 x 8 p.t. members.
5. Replace all 4 x 4 p.t. posts and hardware.
The implementation of a maintenance program of the wood structure such as the
addition of a stain every 2 to 3 years will increase the life span of most of the wood
components used in the construction of the tramway /bridge. Periodic maintenance of the
hardware such as checking for tightness at all the attachment points would cut down on
the vibration.
Sincerely,
Derek P. Cronin, PE #553 2
Principal , -
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
3of15
CLAM PARK PASS TRAMWAY/BRIDGE PHOTOGRAPHS
PHOTO #I: CLAM PARK PASS WOOD PILES
PHOTO #2: PILES LOCATED AT THE DRAWBRIDGE AREA OF THE TRAMWAY.
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
4of15
PHOTO #3: 4 X 14 P.T. KNEE BRACES AT THE DRAWBRIDGE AREA OF TRAMWAY. SEE
ARROWS.
PHOTO #4: 6 X 6 P.T. POST ATTACHMENT POINT OF KNEE BRACING AT THE
DRAWBRIDGE AREA. SEE ARROWS.
4
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
5of15
PHOTO #5: 4 X 14 P.T. MEMBER ATTACHMENT OF KNEE BRACING. SEE ARROW.
PHOTO #6: 4 X 14 P.T. MEMBER ATTACHMENT OF KNEE BRACING. SEE ARROW.
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
6of15
PHOTO #7: HARDWARE AT THE ATTACHMENT POINTS WAS FOUND TO BE LOOSE;
LACK OF LOCK WASHERS AND INTERMITTMENT VIBRATION DUE TO VEHICULAR
TRAFFIC MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THIS CONDITION. SEE ARROWS.
PHOTO #8: 3 x 8 P.T. BOARDS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DRAWBRIDGE WATERWAY
WERE FOUND TO .HAVE SOME DECREE OF .ROT.
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
7of15
PHOTO #9: 4x 4 P.T. POST ATTACHING BOTTOM MEMBER TO UPPER SUPPORT BEAM
SPLIT. UPPER AND BOTTOM MEMBERS APPEAR TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION. SEE
ARROWS.
PHOTO # 10: CROSS BRACING SPLIT AND DETERIORATED HARDWARE. SEE ARROWS.
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
8of15
PHOTO # 11: STEEL ANGLE CLIPS AT THE TOP PORTION OF KNEE BRACING APPEARS
TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION. SEE ARROWS.
8
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
9of15
From: Bart Zino .[ mai Ito: bzino@pbscontractors.coml
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:53 AM
To: McAlpinGary; ddperonin(J1aol.com
Cc: OchsLeo; RamseyMarla; WilliamsBarry; OlsonNancy; PerrymanClinton
Subject: RE: Clam Pass Bridge Repair
Gary,
I may have mis- represented costs. The figure of "north of $200K" referred to the prescribed repairs to the
bents and frames as well as the visual inspection. The coffer dam and inspection situation by itself is
around $100K, plus permitting fees, and now if we are trucking muck and re- filling with stone, etc. there
will be some additional money for that, but not $150K..
Bart Zino, LEED AP
President
PBS Construction, Inc.
4395 Corporate Square
Naples, FL 34104
Office: 239 - 643 -6527
Fax: 239 - 643 -1080
Cell: 239 - 825 -3137
bzinoa)pbscontractors.com
www.pbscontractors.com
2010 ent ntfil Builder of t1it� is Year
,�tr�rrriaarrt�Xt.�rtrtrfa' +z�' frc'+�dtc�t�
I torhAt .5`rrwh went f. "Pra Ater
From: McAlpinGary rmai Ito: GaryMcAlpin(a)colIier oq v.netl
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 20115:35 PM
To: dperonin(d)aol.com
Cc: OchsLeo; RamseyMarla; WilliamsBarry; OlsonNancy; PerrymanClinton; Bart Zino
Subject: FW: Clam Pass Bridge Repair
Derek,
The last time we spoke, I indicated that we would inspect the piers at Clam Pass this year as part of our
maintenance program.
In our discussion, you indicated that the only way to positively inspect these piers was to open them up
and do a physical inspection. We talked about a cofferdam, remove 3 feet of material and do a physical
inspection. 9 piers are in the water. Working with Kelly Brothers and PBS, we discussed a 5 or 6 foot
diameter metal culvert split in the middle for a cofferdam and access from the top of the bridge because
of the shallowness of the water. We would use a mud pump to pump it out and do the inspection. Your
firm would do the inspections and recommendations.
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
10 of 15
Problem is permits and the cost. Since this is just an inspection, do we need any permits if we truck the
muck from the cofferdam to the landfill and backfill the hole with rock?
The other issue is the cost. We really don't want to spend $250K for this inspection. We all agreed that
a visual inspection is required but that was before we understood that it would cost so much. Do you
have any experience with structural divers or penetrating radar? Any other suggestions or comments?
We'll open it up and do a physical inspection if we have to but.....
Comments?
Gary
From: Bart Zino jmailto :bzino(a)pbscontractors.coml
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 20117:46 AM
To: McAlpinGary; PerrymanClinton
Subject: Clam Pass Bridge Repair
Guys,
Sorry this is taking so long. Questions came up and the scope of work is getting larger. Regarding
permits, what is the intent?
Possible permitting needs are Building Permit? DEP Permit? Army Corp permit? Dewatering Permit?
Anything else you can think of?
Regarding any and all of these permits, we can do the admin, but I will not have engineering, drawings,
surveys or other design services included. Don't forget the fees payable to all these agencies, I will not
have that included either, and you will need to reserve some money for everybody.
Give me direction as soon as possible and I will complete our proposal and get back to you. As it stands,
the coffer dams and dewatering, and the repairs listed in the Cronin Report are putting you north of
$200K. Let me know if we need to reassess before I go too deep.
Bart Zino, LEED AP
President
44 P'w
PBS Construction, Inc.
4395 Corporate Square
Naples, FL 34104
Office: 239 - 643 -6527
Fax: 239 - 643 -1080
Cell: 239 - 825 -3137
bzino(a)pbscontractors.com
www.pbscontractors.com
2010 Builder of the Year
oserh on tmfiaxrk exof 'ErvArima °A
Florida Sorah we ,t Chapter
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
11 of 15
From: dperonin(a)-aol.com (mailto:dperonin @aol.coml
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 4:03 PM
To: McAlpinGary
Subject: Re: Clam Pass Bridge Repair
Gary
can arrange for a staff PE to dive underwater to evaluate the piling and avoid the coffer dams.
Would require you to arrange for a boat.
Would need some kind of water jet. Need to go 3' -4' below mudline and look at piles.
My costs would be $250 hour engineer PE diving+ expenses scuba equipment.
Not sure number hours involved. Assume 1 -2 piles per 8 hour day. Then report probably another
$3,500.00 once field work is done.
Call me to discuss at 239 - 593 -2157
Derek Cronin PE
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: dperonin <dperonin(a)-aol.com>
To: GaryMcAlpin <GaryMcAlpin(cDcolliergov.net>
Sent: Wed, Sep 21, 2011 3:09 pm
Subject: Re: Clam Pass Bridge Repair
Gary
I am looking into the options I will get back to you this week.
Derek Cronin PE
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: McAlpinGary <GaryMcAlpin(a)_colliergov.net>
To: dperonin <dperonin(a)aol.com>
Cc: OchsLeo <LeoOchs(a)_colliergov.net >; RamseyMarla <MarlaRamsey(a)_colliergov.net >; WilliamsBarry
< BarryWilliams (a)colliergov.net >; OlsonNancy <NancyOlson(a)colliergov.net >; PerrymanClinton
< ClintonPer ryman(a)colliergov.net >; Bart Zino <bzino(a)-pbscontractors.com>
Sent: Tue, Sep 20, 2011 5:35 pm
Subject: FW: Clam Pass Bridge Repair
Derek,
The last time we spoke, I indicated that we would inspect the piers at Clam Pass this year as
part of our maintenance program.
In our discussion, you indicated that the only way to positively inspect these piers was to open
them up and do a physical inspection. We talked about a cofferdam, remove 3 feet of material
and do a physical inspection. 9 piers are in the water. Working with Kelly Brothers and PBS,
we discussed a 5 or 6 foot diameter metal culvert split in the middle for a cofferdam and access
from the top of the bridge because of the shallowness of the water. We would use a mud pump
to pump it out and do the inspection. Your firm would do the inspections and recommendations.
Problem is permits and the cost. Since this is just an inspection, do we need any permits if we
truck the muck from the cofferdam to the landfill and backfill the hole with rock?
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7-a Staff Reports
12 of 15
The other issue is the cost. We really don't want to spend $250K for this inspection. We all
agreed that a visual inspection is required but that was before we understood that it would cost
so much. Do you have any experience with structural divers or penetrating radar? Any other
suggestions or comments?
We'll open it up and do a physical inspection if we have to but.....
Comments?
Gary
From: Bart Zino [mai Ito: bzi no(cD pbscontractors. com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 7:46 AM
To: McAlpinGary; PerrymanClinton
Subject: Clam Pass Bridge Repair
Guys,
Sorry this is taking so long. Questions came up and the scope of work is getting larger. Regarding
permits, what is the intent?
Possible permitting needs are Building Permit? DEP Permit? Army Corp permit? Dewatering Permit?
Anything else you can think of?
Regarding any and all of these permits, we can do the admin, but I will not have engineering, drawings,
surveys or other design services included. Don't forget the fees payable to all these agencies, I will not
have that included either, and you will need to reserve some money for everybody.
Give me direction as soon as possible and I will complete our proposal and get back to you. As it stands,
the coffer dams and dewatering, and the repairs listed in the Cronin Report are putting you north of
$200K. Let me know if we need to reassess before I go too deep.
Bart Zino, LEED AP
President
PBS Construction, Inc.
4395 Corporate Square
Naples, FL 34104
Office: 239 - 643 -6527
Fax: 239 - 643 -1080
Cell: 239 - 825 -3137
bzino @pbscontractors.com
www.pbscontractors.com
2010 Builder of the Year
American lrt,.&ute of Arvkile t
Florida 5`rurthwev Chapter
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a p
Cronin Engineering, Inc. CoA#8597
6627 Willow Park Drive
Naples, FL 34109
Phone:(239) 593 -2157
Date: September 23`d, 2011
Gary McAlpin
Collier County Coastal Zone Management
RE: Clam Pass Bridge Pier Evaluation
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
13 of 15
Fax: (239) 593 -8820
SCOPE OF STRUCTURAL SERVICES:
1.) On site inspection of existing conditions of bridge timber piling. Evaluation will be
conducted above water line in boat. Evaluation will be conducted below waterline in
diving equipment.
2.) Physical tests with knife to determine structural integrity of timber piling.
3.) Written report of existing conditions of bridge piers.
4.) Reccomendations for pier repair and remediation if required.
REQUESTED SERVICES BY COLLIER COUNTY:
1.) Permitting as required.
2.) Provide Boat and Captain
3.) Provide Safety "Buddy" Diver
4.) Provide Diving Equipment
METHOD OF BILLNG:
Professional Engineer $250.00 per hour
WORK AUTHORIZED BY:
Signature of Authorization
rerek P. Cronin PE
CAC February 9, 2012
VII -7 -a Staff Reports
14 of 15
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: McAlpinGary
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 3:35 PM
To: OchsLeo; RamseyMarla; CampSkip; JonesHank; WilliamsBarry;
O1sonNancy
Subject: RE: Clam Bay Bridge Repair
Leo,
In response to the Clam Pass Bridge Inspection /Repairs:
The County on initial recommendation from the Structural Engineer
proceeded to develop a plan to install a cofferdam system around the
bridge piles to inspect them in a "dry condition ". We also intended
to perform the miscellaneous non - structural, non - critical timber and
bolt replacements at the same time. The price for this inspection
exceeded $100,000 and the structural engineer indicated that a very
adequate in -water structural inspection could be performed at
significantly reduced costs.
During an inspection of the operations of the boardwalk it was
discovered that the bridge mechanism at the span could not be open.
This was verified by staff along with damage to the electrical motor
that raised and lowered the bridge section.
Currently scope is being developed that will address not only the
inspection but also the bridge racking and the electrical /mechanical
repairs. The scope and budget should be completed next week. Based
on what we know now, We expect the cost of the inspection and repairs
to be from $75,000 to $100,000. This does not include any significant
bridge piling repair and /or replacement. This item will need to go to
the TDC for approval later this month and depending on the budget
price the BCC in February.
Hank Jones from Facilities has also agreed to head this project up and
get it accomplished in a timely manner.
Gary
Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not
want your e-mail address released in response to a public records
request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact
this office by telephone or in writing.
s
a
z
a
m
LL
U
Q
U
GENERAL NOTES
1.STATE PLANE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERICAN
DATUM OF 1983, FLORIDA EAST ZONE AND WERE COLLECTED UTILIZING THE COLLIER
COUNTY GPS NETWORK.
2. ELEVATIONS RELATIVE TO NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD
1988) WERE OBTAINED ON EACH OF THE EIGHT NAILS PREVIOUSLY INSTALLED BY
JOHNSON ENGINEERING. ELEVATIONS WERE OBTAINED USING CONVENTIONAL SURVEY
METHODS WITH A LEICA AUTOLEVEL AND ROD. ALL DATA COLLECTED IS WITHIN A
CLOSED LEVEL LOOP AND ACCURACY ACHIEVED EXCEEDED FLORIDA MINIMUM
TECHNICAL STANDARDS.
3. THE "2008" ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON WERE COLLECTED BY JOHNSON
ENGINEERING ON AUGUST 13, 2008 AND CONVERTED BY COASTAL ENGINEERING
CONSULTANTS, INC (CEC) FROM AN ASSUMED VERTICAL DATUM TO NAVD 1988
DATUM BY COLLECTING NUMEROUS GPS OBSERVATIONS ON NAIL ID "C ". CEC
APPLIED AN ADJUSTMENT OF - 88.45' TO CONVERT ASSUMED DATUM TO NAVD 1988.
NAIL I.Q.
O
IN G
201t-ELEMIOR
2008 ELEVATION
A
685258.9259
389232.9514
11.37
11.37
B
685246.2800
389271.1518
12.44
12.45
C
685255.2024
389291.9111
12.51
12.51
D
685252.6000
389314.1098
12.56
12.56
E
685241.9622
1389313.2520
1
12.28
1 12.29
F
685251.9212
389329.7051
12.51
12.51
G
685240.9571
389328.7666
12.49
12.49
H
685239.0716
389349.5041
12.51
12.51
COLLIER COUNTY COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT 04 � -01� ")
COASTAL--ENGINEER ING_C SULTANTS, INC.
FLORI A BU €5 �ACITHO)ZATtCoktNO. LB 2464
RICHARD J. EWINIJ, V /I
PROFESSIONAL SURV Y6P AND MAPPER
FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 5295
NOT VALID WITHOUT THE. SIGNATURE AND
THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL. OF A' FLORIDA
LICENSED SURVEYOR AND 'MAPPER
DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: 04/01/11
DATE OF SIGNATURE: ,4. S- - if
INC. YIArvNIrv4 JtKYi(;LJ RJE' -' ;4
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF EIGHT HISTORICAL LOCATIONS PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED
.. A CECI GROUP COMPANY C. P• 495' 25E -'-
SeMng Florida Sl- 1877 PHONE: (238)643 -2324 ON THE EXISTING BRIDGE OVER CLAM PASS LYING IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,
FAX' 238,643 -1143 cAD No. - - -- -
3106 SOUTH HORSESHOE DRIVE www.<oostalenginearing.com RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA __._,__.__ x7.311
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 E M it: engcalllarOCeci /Lcom 07311 -Bridgel NO. I DATE BY REVISION DESCR1PnDN
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -1 New Business
1 of 3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the Conceptual Plan for the FY2013/14 beach renourishment of
Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore and Naples beaches.
OBJECTIVE: A conceptual plan has been developed that addresses various options and costs for the
next major beach renourishment in Collier County. The renourishment is currently scheduled for FY
2013/14. Staff is requesting direction and approval from the BCC on how to proceed.
CONSIDERATIONS: The BCC directed staff in the 2011 joint Collier County and City of Naples
workshop to maximize the interval between major beach renourishments. To accomplish this, past beach
performance was analyzed, the coast was modeled, hot spots identified and options developed that
incrementally increase the scope and cost to maximize beach renourishment. The Conceptual Plan and
the Conceptual Design Report are attached.
The four options developed are:
Option 1 — Execute the TS Fay FEMA design
This would place 175,000 CY's of fill sand at a cost of approximately $10M on the beach. This sand
placement would only restore the damage from TS Fay and not extend the life of this project
whatsoever. It would not address any hot spot locations and would not include any Jetty work to
stabilize the beach. Only a minor permit modification for the extra nourishment would be required.
Option 2 — Execute the 2005/2006 design
This would place 482,000 CY's of fill sand on the beach at an estimated cost of $19M. This would
continue with the six year design project life that most likely can be extended. This project would not
maximize the renourishment cycle and does not address the Clam Pass or Barefoot Beach
renourishment needs. Additionally, it does not address the beach hot spots, the groins at Park Shore or
the need for a jetty spur south of Doctors Pass.
Option 3 — Execute the 2005/2006 design with beach and hot spot enhancements
This would place 612,000 CY's of fill sand at a cost of approximately $24M on the beach. It would
also include: The removal of the groins at Clam Pass ($400K); the renourishment of Clam Pass Park
Beach (30K CY's at $950K); and the repair /rebuild of Barefoot Beach (100K CY's at $2.8M) which
has lost 200 Linear width of beach over the last 15 -20 years. This approach does not maximize the
renourishment cycle and continues with a six plus year design that has the potential to be stretched to
a longer life. It does however begin to address significant hot spots that have been identified through
beach monitoring and modeling.
Option 4 — Execute a ten -year project that maximizes the renourishment cycle
This option would maximize the time between renourishment events with a 787K CY renourishment
with an estimated cost of $31M. This plan will increase the beach height (5 feet NAVD or 6.3 feet
NGVD) as well as the construction width in sections as required to increase critical mass to resist
erosion and produce a true ten year beach renourishment. A jetty spur on Doctors Pass is included to
minimize erosion on the down drift beaches. In addition to renourishment of the Vanderbilt, Park
Shore and Naples beach, this option includes renourishment for Clam Pass Park beach, the
rebuild/repair of Barefoot beach, removal of groins in Park Shore beach, the jetty spur to Doctors
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -1 New Business
2 of 3
Pass and addressing the additional hot spots with additional critical mass through increased sand
placement. A FDEP permit modification is required for this modification.
Savings on the project cost could be expected if it was possible to achieve the following items:
• Approximately $5M- $7M could be achieved if the TS Fay PW was extended.
• $1M could be saved if this project is combined with similar projects from the Captiva Erosion
Control District and/or the City of Longboat Key to share mobilization costs and take advantage of
economies of scale. The economies of scale are significant as well as early bidding before contractors
have committed their production capacity to other projects.
• $lM - $2M savings can be expected if schedule flexibility is enhanced to allow year round
renourishment. Examples of schedule flexibility that would result in a price reduction are: stockpiling
sand off shore in the non -peak renourishment timeframe; early contracting that would allow
maximum planning and minimizing equipment mobilization costs; schedule that permits
renourishment during off season and/or low equipment utilization periods; ability for the contractor to
pursue "projects of opportunity" with clear and specific guidelines /restraints and schedules that
identify start and completion dates and with approval, allow the contractor the flexibility to manage
the schedule.
• Maximizing FDEP's cost share contribution to this project.
• If the schedule cost savings are to be pursued, a FDEP permit modification must be applied for that
will permit year round renourishment or renourishment during a portion of turtle nesting season.
Turtle nesting season begins on May 1" and ends on October 31s` of each year. The FDEP, USACE, FWS
and FWC will allow year round renourishment and FWC and FDEP have indicated they have "No
Objections" to granting a permit for year round renourishment. No Collier County Ordinance prohibits
renourishment during turtle nesting season. However, Collier County has always strived to be excellent
environmental stewards and avoid any negative impacts to nesting by renourishment during turtle nesting
season. Additionally, the Conservancy of SW Florida recognizes the importance of healthy, cost effective
beaches to our local economy and both organizations agree and support without objection the following
renourishment schedule.
1. Renourishment to begin on September 15, 2013 on the Naples beach segment which has the lowest
nesting density of all beaches within Collier County. This will require any nest laid after 7/7/13 on a
Naples beach segment to be relocated to a designated relocation area. Offshore mobilization can
proceed prior to 9/15/13 and the landing of the offshore pipeline on the beach prior to 9/15/13 is
permitted. Pipe and equipment staging on the beach will not be allowed before 9/15/13.
2. Renourishment will proceed from south to north renourishing the Naples, Park Shore, Clam Pass,
Vanderbilt and Barefoot beaches. All renourishment activities will be complete by 6/1/14. This
equates to an 8.5 month renourishment cycle.
3. A permit modification will be supported by the Conservancy of SW Florida to begin renourishment
on 9/15 and complete all renourishment activities by 6/1 the following year.
Recommendations:
1. Seek a permit modification to allow beach renourishment from 9/15 to 6/1 of the following year.
2. Options will be developed and presented to the BCC for their decision making as funding;
schedule coordination and scope definition is resolved.
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -1 New Business
3 of 3
3. Scope manage this project based on direction from the BCC to match available funding with sand
placement quantities at the time of renourishment.
4. Assure appropriate staffing, training and permitting of turtle monitors and relocation specialists.
Work with State and Federal agencies in the development of this plan.
5. Aggressively pursue partnership with the City of Longboat Key and Captiva Erosion Control
District to reduce mobilization costs and take advantage of economies of scale. Additionally,
pursue early bidding before contractors have committed production capacity to other projects.
6. Maximize leverage with FEMA and FDEP to secure project funding.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for this project will be from Tourist Development Tax, Fund 195.
It is estimated that the construction costs for Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore and Naples Beaches
will be between $20,000,000 - $30,000,000 depending on the project approach, scope and funds available. It
is also estimated that the permit design, plans and specifications for this project will cost $400,000 to
$600,000. Pre - construction, during construction and post - construction activities are estimated to cost an
additional $800,000 and $1,000,000.
No additional carrying costs, operating or maintenance costs are expected with approval of this
Conceptual Plan.
No additional carrying costs, operating or maintenance costs are currently anticipated as a result of the
Beach Renourishment project itself. As the design and permitting process advances, the maintenance and
lifecycle costs will continue to be evaluated.
Using today's dollars, the total cost to replace the asset is $20,000,000 to $30,000,000. The project has
an expected life expectancy of 10 years generating a hypothetical annual depreciation cost of $2 to $3
million.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to
this action.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office,
requires majority vote, and is legally sufficient for Board action. —
RECOMMENDATION: To approve the Conceptual Plan for the FY2013/14 beach renourishment of
Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore and Naples beaches.
PREPARED BY: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Director, Coastal Zone Management Department
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -1 -a New Business
1 of 7
January 26, 2012 - Draft
February 3, 2012 — Rev. 1
Barefoot, Vanderbilt, Clam Pass, Park Shore and Naples Beach Renourishment
The 2005/06 renourishment project was limited in placement scope quantities due to
FDEP's concerns that sand would migrate to the near shore hardbottom marine habitat
and smother it. What was provided was a six year beach design life that is currently
being stretched to eight to nine years.
The BCC directed staff in the 2011 joint Collier County and City of Naples workshop to
maximize the interval between renourishments. Staff modeled the coast and developed
four options for a Conceptual Design.
• Option 1 — Execute the TS Fay FEMA design
This would place 175,000 CY's of fill sand at a cost of approximately $10M on the
beach. This sand placement would only restore the damage from TS Fay and not
extend the life of this project whatsoever. It would not address any hot spot
locations and would not include any Jetty work to stabilize the beach. Only a minor
permit modification for an extra nourishment would be required.
• Option 2 — Execute the 2005/2006 design
This would place 482,000 CY's of fill sand on the beach at an estimated cost of
$19M. This would continue with the six year design project life that most likely can
be extended. This project would not maximize the renourishment cycle and does
not address the Clam Pass or Barefoot Beach renourishment needs. Additionally, it
does not address the beach hot spots, the groins at Park Shore or the need for a
jetty spur south of Doctors Pass.
• Option 3 — Execute the 2005/2006 design with beach and hot spot enhancements
This would place 612,000 CY's of fill sand at a cost of approximately $24M on the
beach. It would also include: The removal of the groins at Clam Pass ($400K); the
renourishment of Clam Pass Park Beach (30K CY's at $950K); and the repair /rebuild
of Barefoot Beach (100K CY's at $2.8M) which has lost 200 Linear width of beach
over the last 15 -20 years. This approach does not maximize the renourishment
cycle and continues with a six plus year design that has the potential to be stretched
to a longer life. It does however begin to address significant hot spots that have
been identified through beach monitoring and modeling.
• Option 4 — Execute a ten -year project that maximizes the renourishment cycle
This option would maximize the time between renourishment events with a 787K CY
renourishment with an estimated cost of $31M. This plan will increase the beach
height (5 feet NAVD or 6.3 feet NGVD) as well as the construction width in sections
as required to increase critical mass to resist erosion and produce a true ten year
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -1 -a New Business
2of7
beach renourishment. A jetty spur on Doctors Pass is included to minimize erosion
on the down drift beaches. In addition to renourishment of the Vanderbilt, Park
Shore and Naples beach, this option includes renourishment for Clam Pass Park
beach, the rebuild /repair of Barefoot beach, removal of groins in Park Shore beach,
the jetty spur to Doctors Pass and addressing the additional hot spots with additional
critical mass through increased sand placement. A FDEP permit modification is
required for this modification.
Savings on the project cost could be expected if it was possible to achieve the following
items:
• Approximately $5M- $7M could be achieved if the TS Fay PW was extended.
• $1 M could be saved if this project is combined with similar projects from the Captiva
Erosion Control District and /or the City of Longboat Key to share mobilization costs
and take advantage of economies of scale. The economies of scale are significant
as well as early bidding before contractors have committed their production capacity
to other projects.
• $1 M - $2M savings can be expected if schedule flexibility is enhanced to allow year
round renourishment. Examples of schedule flexibility that would result in a price
reduction are: stockpiling sand off shore in the non -peak renourishment timeframe;
early contracting that would allow maximum planning and minimizing equipment
mobilization costs; schedule that permits renourishment during off season and /or low
equipment utilization periods; ability for the contractor to pursue "projects of
opportunity" with clear and specific guidelines /restraints and schedules that identify
start and completion dates and with approval, allow the contractor the flexibility to
manage the schedule.
• Maximizing FDEP's cost share contribution to this project.
• If the schedule cost savings are to be pursued, a FDEP permit modification must be
applied for that will permit year round renourishment or renourishment during a
portion of turtle nesting season.
Renourishment during turtle nesting season
Turtle nesting season begins on May 1st and ends on October 31St of each year. The
FDEP, USACE, FWS and FWC will allow year round renourishment and FWC and
FDEP have indicated they have "No Objections" to granting a permit for year round
renourishment. No Collier County Ordinance prohibits renourishment during turtle
nesting season.
However, Collier County has always strived to be excellent environmental stewards and
avoid any negative impacts to nesting by renourishment during turtle nesting season.
Additionally, the Conservancy of SW Florida recognizes the importance of healthy, cost
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -1 -a New Business
3 of 7
effective beaches to our local economy and both organizations agree and support
without objection the following renourishment schedule.
1. Renourishment to begin on September 15, 2013 on the Naples beach segment
which has the lowest nesting density of all beaches within Collier County. This will
require any nest laid after 7/7/13 on a Naples beach segment to be relocated to a
designated relocation area. Offshore mobilization can proceed prior to 9/15/13 and
the landing of the offshore pipeline on the beach prior to 9/15/13 is permitted. Pipe
and equipment staging on the beach will not be allowed before 9/15/13.
2. Renourishment will proceed from south to north renourishing the Naples, Park
Shore, Clam Pass, Vanderbilt and Barefoot beaches. All renourishment activities
will be complete by 6/1/14. This equates to an 8.5 month renourishment cycle.
3. A permit modification will be supported by the Conservancy of SW Florida to begin
renourishment on 9/15 and complete all renourishment activities by 6/1 the following
year.
Recommendations:
1. Seek a permit modification to allow beach renourishment from 9/15 to 6/1 of the
following year.
2. Options will be developed and presented to the BCC for their decision making as
funding; schedule coordination and scope definition is resolved.
3. Scope manage this project based on direction from the BCC to match available
funding with sand placement quantities at the time of renourishment.
4. Assure appropriate staffing, training and permitting of turtle monitors and
relocation specialists. Work with State and Federal agencies in the development
of this plan.
5. Aggressively pursue partnership with the City of Longboat Key and Captiva
Erosion Control District to reduce mobilization costs and take advantage of
economies of scale. Additionally, pursue early bidding before contractors have
committed production capacity to other projects.
6. Maximize leverage with FEMA and FDEP to secure project funding.
CAC February 9, 2012
V111-1 -a New Business
4 of 7
Great Lakes 2122 York Road
Oredge & Dock Oak Brook. Illinois 6€7523
Company 630,574.3000
y
1 November 2011
J. Gary McAlpin, Director
Coastal Zone Management
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 103
Naples, Florida 34112
Dear Gary,
Re: Upcoming Beach Projects
Thanks for taking time to meet with Sam Morrison, our Area Manager and me at the FSBPA
conference. It is always good to see you. I wanted to reiterate some of the constructability
comments we shared during that discussion which also included the folks from Captiva as well as
Steve Keehn from CPE.
Mobilization Savings. For sure, one of the biggest costs on a large scale dredging project
is mobilization. We often encourage our clients and consulting engineer friends to
combine similar projects whenever possible to allow for cost efficiencies, Based on our
past experiences and your anticipated plans, combining projects with the Captiva Erosion
Control District appears to be the right thing to do As we discussed, there are no hard
and fast numbers to apply, but with mobilization costs in the general in the range of
$2,000,000 to $5,000,000 per project there are certainly significant cost savings to be
realized.
Environmental Windows. Working around the turtle windows can result in significant cost
savings also. Most of the industry's annual hopper dredge work gets compressed into the
winter months by Federal budget delays and endangered species issues. This impacts
our costs not only by increased scheduling pressures, but also puts the work into the
more difficult weather months when working in the ocean becomes more dangerous and
costly. Our industry typically has our best equipment availability in the summer months
and as a result, the Corps and other clients look to schedule whatever projects that have
such flexibility for those months when costs are reduced and schedules are more reliable.
3. Scheduling. Flexibility is always important for a vessel operator, like a hopper dredging
company. There are two ways for you to show that flexibility and win favorable pricing.
One is to bid the project with sufficient lead time to allow the contractor to get his support
equipment (pipeline, etc) to the job site on a reasonable schedule. What is important for
this point is that it is not critical when the work starts, it is more important when it ends. III
you have scheduling issues, identify them, but provide flexibility wherever you can. In
line with that, the second way is to provide as much completion time as possible and then
not object to the contractor performing other projects often called "opportunity projects ".
While it is difficult to quantify the cost benefits to you upfront, we can tell you that we do
lower our prices for those projects on the order of 5% to 20% when such flexibility is
allowed.
Gary McAlpin
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII-1 -a New Business
5 of 7
1 November 2011
4. Partnering. One of the best things you can have with industry is a good relationship.
While in any given contract or project there may be issues and conflict, in a perpetual
business like ours, we have to assure each other's success. Engaging us in the
conversation upfront is valuable to us on a lot of levels as we hope it is for you. You have
always been straight with us and that has allowed us to put our best price on the table.
Good luck as this project moves forward, we look forward to working with you again. Please don't
hesitate to contact Sam or I with other questions or comments.
Regards
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company
William H. Hanson
Vice President
CC: Sam Morrison, GLDD
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -1 -a New Business
6of7
Subject: Collier County and FWC Video Conference Call
Date / Time: Tuesday, January 17`h, 2012 —10:00 am
Purpose: Discuss plan that would allow construction of next Collier County Nourishment Project to
extend into sea turtle nesting season (requiring a modification to Permit No. 0222355 - 001 -JC)
Collier County is interested in requesting a modification to Permit No. 0222355- 001 -JC which would, in
part, allow construction of the next beach nourishment project to extend into sea turtle nesting season,
if necessary. The duration of the project (including mobilization and demobilization), especially if the
project is constructed jointly with other nearby counties, will likely make construction entirely outside of
nesting season impossible; therefore, the County seeks the flexibility to construct during nesting season
when necessary. Collier County is committed to sea turtle conservation, and believes that through
proactive coordination with FWC a plan can be developed that will balance the need for nourishment of
Collier County beaches with conservation measures that will avoid or minimize impacts to nesting and
hatchling sea turtles. Collier County proposes the following suggestions as possible ways to accomplish
this goal, and welcomes comments and discussion from FWC.
Advance Planning and Coordination:
• Local Coordination and Management: Collier County will ensure that all project activities comply
with local codes and ordinances, and the County Manager can provide a letter which states this
compliance and approves the project. The City of Naples is a partner in this project and can
provide similar assurances.
• Prepare Necessary Resources: Collier County will ensure that the necessary resources are
available which will enable the County to conduct all sea turtle conservation measures (i.e.,
nesting surveys, relocation, data collection). If necessary, the County would apply for another
FWC sea turtle permit and /or secure outside help with proper credentials, which would allow
more trained personnel to assist with these activities.
• Plan Potential Relocation Sites: For each construction reach, find potential suitable nest
relocation sites that will protect nests and hatchlings from construction activities while also
maintaining a safe environment with minimal impacts from lighting. Potential areas include
those stretches of Collier County beaches not receiving nourishment, as well as areas back
towards the dune in cases where fill will only be placed on a portion of wider beach sections.
Wide beaches in less developed areas (such as gaps between large condominiums), parks and
gaps in the fill are potential candidate sites. For example, Lowdermilk Park or the condominium
gap in Parkshore between R49 and R50 have potential. Significant coordination with FWC will
go into the final selection of relocation sites.
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -1 -a New Business
7 of 7
Pre - Construction Planning:
• Determine construction optimal direction and timing: Once a contractor has been determined
and it is time to schedule construction, Collier County will coordinate with FWC to devise a
construction plan that would minimize impacts to turtle nesting. For instance, if construction is
going to begin in sea turtle nesting season, it will make sense to start the project in the Naples
Beach segment (which has the lowest nesting density of the project reaches) and then work
north from there. By scheduling the construction in this way, the construction in the higher nest
density areas may avoid peak nesting season. Minimizing impacts to higher nesting areas also
reduces the management and effort required by sea turtle personnel responsible for relocation
and monitoring.
Implementation of Sea Turtle Protection Measures:
• Compliance with all permit conditions: Collier County will conduct the pre - application
meeting with FWC and the contractor. Throughout construction the work will comply with
all FWC and USFWS permit conditions to avoid or minimize impacts to sea turtles, and FWC
will be contacted with any questions or concerns that may arise.
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -2 New Business
1 of 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the FY 12/13 Marco South beach renourishment /structure rebuild
plan.
OBJECTIVE: Obtain direction an approval of the FY 12/13 Marco South beach renourishment/structure
rebuild plan.
CONSIDERATIONS: FEMA authorized PW 0561 as a result of damages caused to the south Marco
beach as a result of Tropical Storm Fay. This PW had an extended completion date of 8/23/2012. Staff
has requested that this completion date be extended to 12/31/2014 to accomplish the modeling,
conceptual design, permitting and construction of this project. Before spending funds, the CAC directed
staff to take a holistic approach to this project; maximize the time between renourishment cycles; and
integrate /evaluate erosion control structures with sand renourishment. To date no decision has been
forthcoming for our time extension request. If this request is not granted only work completed by
8/23/2012 will be eligible for a 75% federal reimbursement.
The CAC approved the expenditure of $89,000 for the permitting of this project on 10/13/2011. The
TDC subsequently approved the same expenditure and scope on 10/24/2011. This authorization only
included permitting and did not include design, specification, construction drawings, construction
monitoring, project certification or closeout. It was done in an attempt to comply with purchasing policy;
begin the long lead time permitting; and determine if this project could be completed by 8/23/2012. RFP
11 -5772 for Beach Renourishment Engineering Services was prepared to select separate consultants for
the major Collier County beach renourishment and the Marco renourishments /structure rebuild project.
The scope of work for these tasks included the design, specification, construction drawings, construction
monitoring, project certification or closeout. Proposals were received from 8 firms and on 12/16/2011 a
Selection Committee recommended a shortlist of firms and recommended staff to begin contract
negotiations with the number one shortlisted firm for both projects.
On January 12, 2012, the CAC endorsed the recommendation of the Selection Committee and
recommended that we negotiate a contract with Coastal Engineering Consultants for Marco
renourishments /structure rebuild project. It also recommended the same for Coastal Planning and
Engineering for the major Collier County beach renourishment. The TDC on January 27, 2012 rejected a
recommendation to move forward with the recommended contractor selection and directed staff to first
bring forward a conceptual plan for the major Collier County beach renourishment project for discussion
and approval. Currently this item is rescheduled to be presented to the TDC on 2/27/12 and the BCC on
3/13/12.
Based on the above, the extreme tightness of the original schedule and a Marco Island Ordinance
prohibiting renourishment during turtle nesting season the construction of the Marco South beach
renourishment /structure rebuild project will be after turtle nesting season is complete this year.
Construction will begin on approximately 11/1/12 and most likely take 3-4 months to complete.
CAC February 9, 2012
VIII -2 New Business
2 of 2
FISCAL IMPACT: If the time extension for PW 0561 is approved by FEMA, the sand placement
portion of this project will be eligible for a 75% federal cost share reimbursement. With an estimated cost
of $1,800,000, Collier County's reimbursement would be approximately $1,350,000. If PW 0561 is not
extended then Collier County would be eligible for 75% of the permitting and design costs with an
estimated reimbursement of approximately $100,000.
The total cost for both the beach renourishment and the structure rebuild is approximately $3,000,000.
Tourist tax, Fund 195 will be used to fund this project. Funds have been projected in the 10 year
schedule /funding forecast for Fund 195. TDC funds will be reimbursed by any monies received by FDEP
or FEMA.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no impact to the Growth Management Plan related to
this action.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff is recommending approval of this plan.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney's Office,
requires majority vote, and is legally sufficient for Board action. —
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve the FY 12/13 Marco South beach
renourishment /structure rebuild plan.
PREPARED BY: J. Gary McAlpin, P.E., Director, Coastal Zone Management Department
Collier County Government
Communication & Customer Relations Contact: 239 - 252 -8848
3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 102 www.collieri!ov.net
Naples, FL 34112 -5746 www.twitter.com/CollierPIO
www.facebook.com /CollierGov
www.voutube.com/CollierGov
February 9, 2012
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
ACCEPTING CATEGORY "A" GRANT APPLICATIONS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
The Coastal Advisory Committee is currently accepting Category "A" grant applications for
fiscal year 2012 -2013.
The application is located on the following Web page
http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx ?pale =1352 and is due by the close of business Friday,
March 30, 2012. Applications can be mailed to the Coastal Zone Management office, 3299
Tamiami Trail East, Suite 103, Naples, FL 34112.
For more information, call Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management director
at 252 -5342 or Gail Hambright, Accountant, at 252 -2966.
-End-