WPS Agenda 12/19/2011COASTAL
ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
WIGGIN'S PASS
SUBCOMMITTEE
MEETING
AGENDA
DECEMBER 19, 2011
MEETING AGENDA
WIGGINS PASS SUBCOMMITTEE
MONDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2011 9:00 A.M. —12:00 P.M.
RISK MANAGEMENT TRAINING ROOM, 3311 TAMIAMI TRAIL E., NAPLES
I. Call to Order
II. Pledge of Allegiance
III. Roll Call
IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda
V. Public Comments
VI. Approval of Minutes
I. May 17, 2011
VII. Staff Reports
1. Public Participation in Subcommittee meeting
2. Public Documents Posting
VIII. New Business
1. Power Point from FDEP Meeting with New Figures
a. Review of Minutes/FDEP November 2011 Meeting
b. Review of Wiggins Pass Project Description
c. Review of Geotechnical Investigations and Reports
2. Review of RAI Request and Responses
3. Discussion of Inlet Management Plan Work to Date
4. Discussion of Letter of Consistency
IX. Old Business
X. Announcements
Wiggins Pass Subcommittee Scheduled Meetings
XI. Committee Member Discussion
XII. Next Meeting Date /Location
January 17, 2012 Human Resource Conference Room 9:00 a.m. -I 1:30 a.m.
XIII. Adjournment
* Public speakers are requested to do the following for any items presented to the Board. Each document should
display thepresenter's name and title of document. Provide a total of 7 copies of each handout, to be distributed
as follows: 3 Board Members, I Minute Taker, I County Attorney; 2 CZM Staff members. * The following websites
provide information, agendas and dates for this subcommittee:
httn: / /www.collierzov.netlIndex .asox ?na a =18 http: / /Www.collierjeov.net/Index asnx ?haze =2390
All interested partied are invited to attend, and to register to speak and to submit their objections, if any, in writing, to the board prior to the
meeting if applicable. For more information, please contact Gail D. Hambright at (239) 252 -2966. If you are a person with a disability who
needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance.
Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Department located at 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, (239) 252 -8380.
Public comments will be limited to 3 minutes unless the Chairman grants permission for additional time. Collier County Ordinance No. 99 -22
requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities before the Board of County Commissioners or advisory boards, register
with the Clerk to the Board in the Board Minutes Records Department.
May 17, 2010
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
WIGGINS PASS SUBCOMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, May 17, 2010
LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Coastal Advisory Committee — Wiggins Pass
Subcommittee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
met on this date at 9:00 A.M. at the Human Resource Training Room located at
3301 Tamiami Trail E, Building B, Naples, Florida, with the following members
present:
Chairman: Joseph A. Moreland
Robert Raymond (Excused)
Victor Rios
Inlet Management Work Team
Jack Kindsvater
Dick Lydon
Nicole Ryan
Jeff Raley (Excused)
ALSO PRESENT: Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management Director
Gail Hambright, Tourist Tax Accountant
Steve Keehn, Coastal Planning and Engineering
Maura Kraus, Principal Environmental Specialist
May 17, 2010
I. Call to Order
Chairman Moreland called the meeting to order at 9:12 AM.
II. Pledge of Allegiance
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
III. Roll Call - A quorum was established.
Also in attendance via teleconference — Sabarna Malakar, Bureau of Beaches and
Coastal Systems.
IV. Changes and Approval of Agenda
The Committee formed a consensus to follow the agenda until 11:00 AM to allow
Boater Characterization Study Presentation to be given by Dr. Sweet.
Gary McAlpin will request to the BCC to accept Sabarna Malakar, a representative
from the FDEP as a Work Team Subcommittee member. Committee continues to seek
members to fill two vacancies.
Victor Rios moved to approve the Agenda as submitted. Second by Dick Lydon.
Motion carried unanimously: Subcommittee 2 -0, Work Team 3 -0.
V. Public Comments —None.
VI. Approval of Minutes — April 19, 2010
Correct Page 3 — 2nd Paragraph 2nd sentence should read: As part of the "RAI"
process.
Dick Lydon moved to approve the April 19, 2010 Minutes as amended.
Second by Nicole Ryan. Motion carried unanimously: Subcommittee 2 -0, Work
Team 3 -0.
VII. Staff Reports
Gary McAlpin reported receipt of an e-mail forwarded from Sgt. Dave Bruening,
Collier County Sheriff's Office. (See attached) Cpl. Todd Byrns of the Marine Bureau
emailed Sgt. Bruening stating Wiggins Pass is closed at dead low tide. Cpl. Todd Byrns
reported checking on a couple who was stuck on Saturday along with other boats.
Staff will post the information on the website for the public and give notice to Pelican
Isle Yacht Club and the U.S. Coast Guard.
Chairman Joseph Moreland suggested Staff include the coordinates and depths when
posting boating information.
VIII. New Business
1. Review/Discussion of May 4, 2010 FDEP.FPS Meeting in Tallahassee
Steve Keehn, CPE gave a brief presentation and summarized the topics discussed
and pertinent concerns at the FDEP FPS Meeting in Tallahassee for the
Subcommittee. (See attached)
May 17, 2010
• FDEP expressed interest in meeting in the future on the Inlet Management Plan
and the Modeling effort.
• Collier County clarified ebb shoal sand and the method of determination on the
direction of bypassing for the park.
• FDEP has requested Collier County demonstrate an alternate means of placing
sand where the greatest need was regardless of volumetric measurements.
• Hot spot issues need to be addressed in the project description or contingency
plan.
• The Request for Additional Items (RAI) response needs to define responsibility
and cause for full re- nourishment or intermediate re- nourishment.
• There is no hard bottom affecting the inlet accept for the Delnor Wiggins Park.
Hard bottom was described as small coral reef.
• FDEP requested Collier County develop a Biological Monitoring Plan.
Steve Keehn stated the Inlet Management Plan will need language to address the
greatest need more than volumetric. He further stated the County did not have to do
the work per the plan. The plan can define who will do the task.
Gary McAlpin stated the Subcommittee will describe the scientific criteria, the type
of monitoring and what stages heighten the re- nourishment event. What triggers a
dredging and re- nourishment will be included in the Inlet Management Plan.
It was noted Jeff Raley and Bob Brantley agreed Delnor- Wiggins Park does not
have severe erosion.
Gary McAlpin clarified FDEP does not believe Collier County has identified where
the hard substrate is and would like more samples taken. FDEP believes the hard
substrate to the north is clay and is very significant. Rock substrate and clay
anchors the pass.
FDEP wants to make sure, if the rock is removed, what the control feature is.
Collier County will need to address the above before the permit will be issued.
It was noted hard bottom will be addressed as rock substrate. Rock bottom is
considerably lower than the dredge limit.
Victor Rios expressed concern on the impact of any actions taken that may have an
effect on other areas.
Gary McAlpin responded the DEP has the same concerns. The Inlet Management
Plan will need to convince DEP the issues that are legitimate and important to
Collier County and the recommended plan will solve the issues permanently and
correctly. He stated another study group was formed to identify the best solutions
and they decided doing nothing was not an option. The issues to focus on are:
• Erosion and habitant destruction to the north of Barefoot Beach.
Wiggins Pass does not have safe boating conditions at low tide.
Effective solutions to address the area in a cost effective way, in an
environmental manner.
May 17, 2010
FDEP concerns are:
• Geological assessments.
• Hydraulic assessments.
• What happens if actions taken impact Delnor- Wiggins State Park and what
Collier County will do to correct.
Steve Keehn stated FDEP recommended Barefoot Beach be declared a critical
eroded area. FDEP will fund 33% toward ebb shoal building on Barefoot Beach,
which will meet one of the Inlet Management Plan objectives.
He proposed the following steps be done out of sea turtle season.
➢ Initial construction outside of turtle season.
➢ Major maintenance dredging every four years.
➢ Intermediate ebb shoal dredging,
➢ Create a contingency and monitoring plan.
➢ Ebb tide shoal re- building.
He also stated it would take several years to re- nourish the beach - 250,000 cubic
yards of sand were previously used. He stated Bob Brantley suggested one ebb
shoal re- nourishment. Steve noted he has never heard of a project where this has
been done.
Gary McAlpin stated the modeling will tell what the optimum approach to replace
the sand will be.
2. Physical, Biological, Contingency, Construction and Inlet Management Plans
and Key Points
Gary McAlpin distributed and addressed the following "Significant Items requiring
discussion/resolution on Wiggins Pass Channel Project" to FDEP for them to issue
permitting. (See attached)
• Physical Plan
• Biological Plan
• Contingency Plan
• Construction Plan
• Inlet Management Plan
• Letter of Consistency
Staff recommended inviting National Marine Fisheries and the US Army Corp to a
future meeting to discuss the Biological Plan. Staff also suggested inviting
Outstanding Florida Waters to discuss what their trigger points are.
It was noted a Biological Opinion will be required.
Steve Keehn recommended Staff be proactive. He suggested Staff not wait for the
permit before writing a letter to request permission from Delnor- Wiggins State Park
for the land use.
May 17, 2010
3. Discussion /Identification of Major Issues
Gary McAlpin reviewed the Physical, Biological and the Contingency Plan issues
for discussion and resolution.
He distributed the criteria for the Letter of Consistency (See attached) and stated the
letter would be exactly as Mr. Lorenz requested.
4. Responsibilities for Resolution of Major Issues and Who Reviews
Joseph Moreland suggested having a point of contact on the Committee, to keep
current on each topic and receive documentation for distribution to the Committee.
Dick Lydon stated having a point of contact makes sense and he inquired as to the
cost to provide the requested additional items for the RAI Response.
Gary McAlpin responded $150,000 has been approved for the EIS Study and
Permitting by the CAC and will be submitted for approval from TDC and the Board
of County Commissioners.
Gary McAlpin recommended Nicole Ryan be the contact person on the Biological
Plan and items associated with ecology and environment issues.
Staff will be the point of contact for The Construction Plan. He asked the
Committee members to let him know if they would be interested in being a point of
contact on any plan.
Nicole Ryan responded positively and volunteered to work on the Letter of
Consistency.
5. Timing of RAI Response
The Staff objective is to have RAI Responses ready to submit to DEP in 90 to 120
days.
Sneakers
Doug Fee stated he was happy that the State is involved. He made a comment on RAI
Response #19. He expressed concern with the funds expended for the process and he
does not believe anything has been done at the County level such as meetings or
reviews. He asked who will write the EIS.
Gary McAlpin responded Bill Lorenz will be assigned the task to write the Letter of
Consistency based on County Boards approval. On his initial review, he did not find
any problems with the scope. The Consultant of record on the project is Coastal
Planning and Engineering. They have done the majority of the environmental work.
Doug Fee asked if the County will be able to meet a "zero" level of water quality in the
construction of the project.
Gary McAlpin said yes, they have never had an issue with increased tepidity levels.
IX. Old Business
1. Discussion of Nearshore Placement of Sand for Maintenance Dredging During
Sea Turtle Season
Gary McAlpin clarified the Coastal Advisory Committee will try to avoid any
beach re- nourishment during turtle nesting. CAC proposed main re- nourishment be
done during turtle nesting season and Maintenance Dredging will be done over a
May 17, 2010
four month period and could be done as a nearshore re- nourishment and outside of
turtle nesting season.
Nicole Ryan distributed a packet of various documents for the Committee's review.
(See attached)
Activity Description - The project is to widen and deepen Wiggins Pass with
subsequent maintenance dredging every two years.
She reviewed:
➢ (Pages 8 & 9) -Permit No. 0142538- 001 -JC
➢ (Page 18) - Wiggins Pass Maintenance Dredging, Modification No.
0142538- 004 -EM
She provided the following sketches to show the difference between nearshore and
offshore.
➢ (Page 23) — Beach Fill Site Plan reflects nearshore disposal site 50' away
from beach.
➢ (Page 24) - Proposed Offshore Disposal Area sketch reflects offshore
disposal.
Wiggins Pass Policy and Planning Guidelines
➢ (Page 26) — No. 10. Summer maintenance dredging to reduce cost and
complexity, with offshore placement.
Attachments
➢ (Page 31) No. 5 Project Description
➢ (Page 34) No. 23c Construction Description
➢ (Page 36) Collier County Sea Turtle Protection Plan Annual Report, 2005 —
Reflects Emergences.
➢ (Page 37) Summary of All Monitored Beaches, 2005 - Reflects 4,200
Hatchlings Emerged
Maura Kraus stated the summary was representative of current times.
Land Development Code 3.04.02
➢ (Pages 39 & 40) Species Specific Requirements — Sea Turtle Protection 5
and 5c.
Nicole Ryan expressed concern vibrations from pipes could disturb female sea
turtles. She recommended maintenance dredging be done after the nesting season.
She provided an email received from Fish and Wildlife stating they always
recommend that the work be done outside sea turtle nesting season.
Maura Kraus stated she shares the same concerns as Nicole Ryan and added lighting
attracts predators and is a bigger concern.
May 17, 2010
Speakers
David Addison, Biologist for the Conservancy of SW Florida stated since 2000 water
head nesting had declined more than 50 percent. Hatchlings will be attracted to light
and will go to them. This will have the hatchling wasting energy by swimming toward
the light and put them in further jeopardy from predatory fish. He urged the Committee
to wait until after turtle nesting season.
Gary McAlpin proposed the following:
❖ The major part of construction will be done outside turtle nesting season with
sand placed on the beach.
❖ Maintenance dredging of the anticipated 40- 50,000 cubic yards of material will
be taken out of the pass over an approximate 4 year period and will bring in a
cutter -head dredge with work to be done out of turtle nesting season with
onshore placement.
❖ Spot dredging will only be performed during daylight hours and the scope of the
work would be approximately 5 -6,000 cubic yards of material during the turtle -
nesting season to be taken offshore.
He asked if this proposal would satisfy the needs of the Community.
Nicole Ryan, Maura Kraus and Dave Addison agreed the proposal would work.
It was noted the equipment will be moved back into the channel away from the beach
each night during turtle nesting season.
Staff will address the three conditions and include options when submitting for a
dredging permit to be done anytime over a one -year period.
It was noted Fish & Wildlife Service and Fish & Wildlife Conservation define the
turtle- nesting season.
Joseph Moreland stated funding for any kind of dredging comes from the tourist dollar
beach re- nourishment fund and their goal is to spend it for beach re- nourishment. He
asked if there was a safety or emergency hot spot dredge required during turtle nesting
season and therefore cannot be used for beach re- nourishment, would the funding be
lost for that particular dredge.
Staff will research with the County Attorney's Office.
Joseph Moreland recommended type of dredging terminology be defined.
Staff suggested the following terminology for dredging events:
• Capital Dredge is a one -time event.
• Maintenance Dredge is performed every four — five years outside of turtle
nesting season with a small cutter -head dredge.
• Spot Dredge is triggered by a navigational problem at the mouth of the
pass.
Nicole Ryan moved to modify the direction of the Inlet Management Plan for the
three dredging maintenance options. Second by Jack Kindsvater.
May 17, 2010
Gary McAlpin recommended the Committee refrain from voting until Staff receives an
opinion from the County Attorney's Office.
Joseph Moreland tabled the motion.
Speakers
Doug Fee agrees with the way the project is going and thinks the County should follow
the Land Development Code. He believes in the process and the public be made aware.
He urged the Committee not to do any work during turtle nesting season.
Susan Calkins stated she was happy with the Subcommittee's decision to go forward
but not during the turtle nesting season.
Michael Seef congratulated the Subcommittee on the decision not to dredge during
turtle nesting season. He stated he appreciated all efforts to avoid damage to the turtles.
Donna Reed Caron stated consideration of maintenance dredging during turtle nesting
season is "incremental at its' finest" and would be a bad move. It has never been done
during the 13 years she has been a resident. She added any dredging should be done
outside of turtle season and boaters should not be in the water in the middle of hurricane
season. She commented boaters should be smart enough not to bring their boats to that
area during low tide. She expressed it was a waste of taxpayers dollars.
X. Announcements
Mr. Sweet has been scheduled to give a Boater Characterization Study presentation
after the meeting is adjourned at the same location.
Gary McAlpin asked the Committee for suggestions on representatives from the
Friends of Barefoot Beach and the Boater Community to serve on the Committee.
Staff would like to fill vacancies over the next month.
XI. Committee Member Discussion — None.
XII. Next Meeting Date
The next meeting of the Wiggins Pass Subcommittee will be held on Monday, June 21
at 9:00 AM.
May 17, 2010
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned
by order of the Chair at 12:00 pm.
Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee —
Wiggins Pass Subcommittee
Joseph A. Moreland, Chairman
These Minutes were approved by the Board/Committee on
as presented , or as amended
Notes from a meeting on the Wiggins Pass Straighten and Inlet Management Study
At FDEP on November 17, 2011
The meeting began 1:30 pm following the outline shown in II below and using a power point slides
to illustrate the topics and facilitate the discussion. Those in attendance were: Robert Brantly,
Lainie Edwards, Subarna Malakar, Jennifer Koch, Vince George, Alex Reed, Steve Keehn and Gary
McAlpin. The major issues discussed and guidance provided are summarized below:
a. The power point illustrated that the proposed channel has been wetted in the recent past, and
was full depth thru the flood shoal as shown on historic charts. In addition, the amount of
unsuitable material is concentrated in the transition zone between the flood and ebb shoals.
The existing channel is located between two massive hard substrates in the ebb shoal, and the
proposed channel dredging will not alter this controlling geological features.
b. The county assumes that the any biological monitoring will be integrated into the program used
for the major beach nourishment project.
c. FDEP appeared to be supportive of the findings from the geological investigation, but still has
some concerns.
i. Jen requested copies of the un- annotated lines from the seismic record. She also
informed us that suitable and unsuitable sands depend on the location in the inlet —
previous dredged at that site and un- dredged areas follow different rules.
ii. FDEP was not supportive of placing unsuitable material (rock, clay, peat) near shore,
ebb shoal or old channel, but supported using old borrow area as disposal locations.
iii. FDEP said comment on the field investigation should be expected in mid - January.
iv. Robert and Jen are concerned about placing coarse material in old flood channel. They
thought that peak ebb flows caused by river discharges may move this material. Steve
pointed out that this material is on the surface of the existing flood shoal and the
existing discharge has not lead to any significant erosion of the flood shoal. In fact the
shell self- armors the shoal.
d. Robert noted that an adapted dredging (maintenance) program would be important and said
that side cast dredging was allowable. Multi- option maintenance program is supportable,
including side casting, different levels of dredging(major and spot) and flexible disposal
locations.
Wiggins Pass Geology and Permitting Outline 1:30PM
1. History of Pass Configurations
a. Pass entrance stability
b. Flood growth and ebb channel rotation
c. Channel straight 80 years ago
d. Flood Vibracores — Light Color sand over dark
2. Design Depths and widths
3. Geological field investigation results
a. Hard substrate reflector map
b. VC and JP refusal depths.
c. Straight channel not change stability
d. Quantity of silty, clay, peat and rock material
4. Proposed alignment
5. Disposal Plans
a. Blind Pass Categories standards
b. Disposal Locations
6. Permit Issues - What are the prospects for a permit?
7. State Park concerns
a. Lack of documentation
b. Parks preferred bypass locations
c. Stump Pass impacts not anticipated
WIGGINS PASS CHANNEL STRAIGHTENING WITH EROSION MITIGATION
DECEMBER 2011
The goals for the Wiggins Pass navigation improvement study as developed by Collier County
and a Wiggins Pass Modeling Evaluation Committee are:
1. To Provide a safe channel for boating
2. To address erosion at Barefoot Beach
3. To lengthen the dredge cycle, accomplished with the least impact on the environment
4. To provide a solution that is economically effective.
A non - structural alternative is an objective for the inlet design in order to improve navigation.
The committee, which formulated the main goals for Wiggins Pass, represented a broad range of
local stake holders appointed by the County government.
Figure 1: Project Component Map
The project recommended in the 2009 modeling study and based on comments generated by the
2010 permit application is summarized below. Refinements were developed during the last year
based on a new field investigations and further consultation with agencies. It addresses not only
navigation, but also improved sand bypassing, modifications to channel dredging, improved
locations for sand disposal and an updated inlet management study. It accomplishes improved
navigation and sediment management by a combination of straightening the channel, major and
small maintenance dredging and new sand disposal practices, as illustrated in Figure 1 above.
Almost every task listed below contributes to both navigation and inlet management, and further
refinements to this plan are expected. It also addresses balancing inlet bypassing based on FDEP
inlet management principles. A 10 -year plan is proposed to achieve the project goals.
1) Initial construction of straightened channel
i) Dredge compatible sand from ebb channel — 41,000 cy (Range 24,000 to 58,000 c.y.)
ii) Dredge flood channel — 36,400 c.y.
iii) Dredge incompatible material — 7,500 c.y.
iv) Build beach, nearshore, ebb shoal and scour repair with compatible sand — 38,200 c.y.
v) Fill meander with compatible sand — 39,200 c.y.
vi) Upland or offshore borrow pit disposal of unsuitable sand -7,500 c.y.
2) Major maintenance dredging — 50,000 c.y. every 4 years with disposal balanced to favor
adjacent Gulf shoreline with greatest need based on equalizing volumetric changes.
i) Place beach compatible sand in beach, nearshore or ebb shoal.
3) Intermediate ebb channel dredging as needed
i) Excavate and clear ebb channel at the bar and laterally place about 8- 10,000 c.y. in
the north ebb shoal to promote regrowth.
4) Create contingency, monitoring, and inlet management plans
i) No direct mitigation expected
5) Nourish critically eroded area on Barefoot Beach and rebuild ebb shoal every 10 years with
100,000 c.y. to supplement bypassing until the shoreline and shoal recovers (this is part of a
separate permit and project).
The plan addresses concerns expressed by FDEP BBCS and Park Service, and other local
interest groups. The engineering report will be supplemented with addition geotechnical field
investigations and analysis to develop an Inlet Management Study as defined in RAI #1 and
FDEP BBCS letter of May 2011.
A structural solution using a jetty, breakwater or T -groin has been suggested as an economical
alternative, but is not supported by FDEP BBCS, and local policy and plans. Given the local
coastal processes, a simple but workable structure would be difficult.
Intermediate and small scale dredging to clear the channel at the bar and pumping dredge
material to an area approximately 300 -1000 feet north of the inlet would serve three purposes.
Clearing the channel and feeding the re- growth of the ebb shoal are two of these purposes. If
dredging could be conducted using smaller equipment during the calmer times of the year, it
would also be very economical.
The method for determining the size and location of bypassing operations between the north and
south beaches will be based on equalizing the volumetric change rate for an equal distance north
and south of the inlet based on the 2001 surveyed profiles. Only volumes dredged in the ebb
shoal will count, since flood shoal dredge and fill operations are a zero sum operation.
Each of the 5 tasks above supports improved navigation and inlet management. The engineering
report has identified three reasons why the 1995 inlet plan did not perform. First, the sediment
transport direction is not predominately southerly. The disposal location and a 50:50 split of
bypassed sand to adjacent beaches was imbalanced. The sand needs to be disposed of closer to
the inlet and approximately 2/3 needs to go to the north. This imbalance disposal since 1984
needs short term supplemental sand to address past practices. The new plan addresses the
imbalance, recovery of the north ebb shoal, the Barefoot Beach hot spot south of R -14 and
improving navigation. The size of the new channel is summarize in the table below.
Wiggins Pass Channel Dimensions
Station
Location
Bottom Width
ft
Depth (ft,
NA VD
Overdred e ft
15 +00
Ebb Shoal
240
-12.0
1.0
0 +00
Ebb Shoal
160
-12.0
1.0
C6
Throat
160
-7.7
1.0
C10
Flood Shoal
130
-7.7
1.0
C15
Flood Shoal
130
-7.7
1.0
C26
East Channel
82
-7.0
1.0
C31
South Channel
123
-7.2
1.0
C35
I North Channel
1 70
1 -7.0
1 1.0
u�
w
L
i
Rk
v
�
o
\/
D
'{
o
FD"
sU
p
�Vm/
Z
o
�
C
(D
O
3
w
C
I
m
N
o
oN
cc
T
m
m
V
I
3
•
/D
i
Rk
v
�
3
D
'{
cam'
cn
CD
0
0
114<
cn
t
r
< x
f.
a�
IV
O
�f
s
AMk
I�
—s
f.
a�
IV
O
f
•
O
�
1
�
r
p
�
D
cn
v
�,-
�
O
Q.
cn
c:
m
�-
o 0
�.
�-
�
o
su
7C3
v
0.
o
n
=
�
o
�
C—
v
t�
-h
�
-0
cn
�
�
o
t�
m
p
3
o
Q
D•
con
cs3
U)
�-
�
D
�
Q
cn
�
o
-�
u
o
°
N
v
cC•
�
o
D
°
o
�
o
M
m
o
�-
cn
n
O
�,
c
,t
Lu
in
E3
—
CD
CD
O
cn
(C_ )
cD
3
3
rnCD
cn
<
2
O
E5
-n
-n
_
O
T
_
(n
�
p
C'
O
O
SU
-
�
p
�
--+%
O
�
1
�
r
p
�
D
cn
v
�,-
�
O
Q.
cn
c:
m
�-
o 0
�.
�-
�
o
su
7C3
v
0.
o
n
=
�
o
�
C—
v
t�
-h
�
-0
cn
�
�
o
t�
m
p
3
o
Q
D•
con
cs3
U)
�-
�
D
�
Q
cn
�
o
-�
u
o
°
N
v
cC•
�
o
D
°
o
�
o
M
m
o
�-
cn
n
O
�,
c
,t
0
—
O
3
rnCD
°
o
-
v
7"
T
U)
U)
L
ft
CD
0
0
CD
3
pe,
00
zz
m
z
0
z
m
m
z
0
If
A
\ ƒ\
C, M
Nc
H 0
a H
>
>
0
m
C�
,)Go
o ) o=
Z18
■
❑
!
e, eI
z
�
-�
�
CD
�CD
o
s
CL
-0
_
O
o
_.
CD
3
_.
-.
�-
CD
o
C�
0
_
CD
o
o�
CD
o
a
—
oo
M
o
M
C
CD
0.
-v
cn
< me) a N - > C', 0
M lF = a M,< "
0a-,Qa,z-
a o
0 78
am
mc,
W 0
ct CL
CD
N4,
a
Z
0 =
= cn
m 0
M<
wOl 0
o
a
I
5,
0 0 0
m 9. m m m
m m m
a cr
X 0 0 O 0 0
3 Er a @
O
tb
tD
0
ci m m
a 0
0 m 0
0 0
O
N o (n
Ah
t
mc,
Ln
CD
<o
3
CL
0
L,
Lf
� n 4
p N
�8 d
° sH 3 m
offi
PP
wj n
aN ��
0
U�
O
CQ� �
of
0
o _
c �
V�
Q m
M �
N N
El
14
:3
Elevation
O
[D
{Cry
W
... .. t.... . ...... - }........ ..
Z
....... ...... ..... _ ..... .... ..w. ..
............... ....... .... .. .... ..
1
A
t•...•. ......... ..., •.t^ ........ Y..... .. ..
w
0
C
CL
CL
v
m
j
ti
Q
G
N
M
0
LU
0
m —
z
� E� }
\ \� \ /
0
3
Elevoilon
1,011
i"No
m
I I Wll Mll XX
at
- CA
-
=•q y �i'ji17 'u ar! I�si�t mr.
is
an ,�r I•, r'� I,�S� #��� � �Lx� fi -;,I { t `.'f .[ i i i �7�,� i #a MI,
(D CD ■
eD
rD
A
O
off" ro
o v v o v n n n
C1. W c N o
x st
cn
CD uj
cn Gn 0
^t b O N O O N
V
O .p .p cn
CD CD CD
CD CL a _W
O
' n Tj fCD
CD
CD � O
CD CD fD
CD
CD (CD
nom■
J
O ■
m
CD
3
+-
T
C/)
-U
�-
r--l-
r+
Cn. CD
0.
3
;F-
0
'-�-
x
-0
_.
0
O
CD
M
CD
c-
(n
CD
r-f-
Q.
O
n
E:
zT
n
O
3
CD
C:
�O
0.
on
0
w
cr
0
1<
C'D
r--I-
c
-0
CD
�
�
cn
O
cn
Cn
CD
O
�-
o
0
0
w
0
-
o
0
0
o
m
CD
3
+-
T
cn
<.�
I—
r+
Cn. CD
CD
0
'-�-
x
-0
_.
O
CD
z
r-f-
Q.
O
n
E:
zT
n
O
CD
C:
cn
on
0
3
0
O
C'D
�
CD
�
Cn
CD
no
�-
o
0
0
-
o
0
o
n-0
Cn
CD
_ ■
r-l-
-n
C
3
m
CD
3
+-
T
The End
w�
G:\ Enterprise \Collier\143561_Wiggins_Pass
Channel
Strai htenin \ MXD \Rock ReFlector Ma .mxd
m�o�m000 Izo
m<o mz,00
vyNmpam�� to
art,^
11- 10DOrw
D p C
m D o m m
DOm �
p O m N
1mZ
2,—�
0 —�� N.17..,
�zM, mm
oM -1 'm
1> � z a
O N�
8
I Itl •f i !� 1
�•d
m< m 3
m z m
q
m m's m y 1n oa"
UY14�f10-��lli
i SIO
°DAB <Am ZO
mmm A OZ
-
om
=2x
Z 0 Z
m,rm 1>1
Z2 m'
m D
m
m
m Om G m b 0
m m v v
t r
v 0 A O O m m m
c Z - Z p 5<
q
�" tlgtlr* ,wE
O m o o
A m
m 2 Ds'
0 0 SA � O O
rr
•. �
c
Z m N
'o
N N Om
x y
'a
D
z m -+ m
^M1«
O_ D
Z 0m
..,
o
b' -
=
O
r
pk:n
-
9.
tioo�,om
1G#
A O
m 2
z 10
< Dr X
O m
"•
m
m z O
rr
tv
mm
ar` -
�
V.
m
m
383400'
p
IL
383600
,
009£8£
t
Fn
(000
y
C m
= c
r
N N
H
o
Onnclo
OD
�r ,,
a
K=;s
can
-
99 z
y S
p
o
00 £9£
o
. 5 c n^
3 y 7
in
tlugo 061
�
O
O
p
p O
z
O
O
O
O
u'
m m
C
A
7C
r,
x 7".
O
0Tv
x
A
nTi
Z
fD'�
m
m
�
z
o
z
z
N
ti
Vt
Occ
r
r
r r
j
r
yrr
tirr
[nz
z
o
O
>
H
yY
y
y
Hr
<N
�..
APPENDIX D
WIGGINS PASS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW
November 2011
(Abridged)
WIGGINS PASS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... ............................... 3
GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS .................. ...............................
3
InvestigationDetails ........................................................................................ ...............................
3
Equipmentand Methods .................................................................................. ...............................
5
NavigationSystems ................................................................................. ...............................
5
Hypack Inc.'s Hypack 2009/2010 a Data Collection and Processing Program .....................
5
BathymetricSurvey ................................................................................. ...............................
5
Seismic Reflection Profile Surveys ......................................................... ...............................
6
VibracoreSurvey ..................................................................................... ...............................
9
RESULTS...................................................................................................... ...............................
11
Reviewof Existing Data ................................................................................ ...............................
11
1979 USACE Vibracores ....................................................................... ...............................
11
2006 Humiston and Moore Vibracores .................................................. ...............................
11
Results of the 2009 and 2011 Investigations ................................................. ...............................
12
2009 CPE Jetprobes ............................................................................... ...............................
12
2009 and 2011 CPE Vibracores ............................................................. ...............................
13
2011 CPE Geophysical Investigations ................................................... ...............................
18
DISCUSSION................................................................................................ ...............................
18
SUMMARY /RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................... ...............................
20
LITERATURECITED .................................................................................. ...............................
21
List of Figures
Figure 1. Geophysical and geotechnical data collected within Wiggins Pass . ............................... 4
Figure 2. EdgeTech X -STAR SB -216s sub -bottom profiling system ............. ............................... 7
Figure 3. Athena electric vibracore system .................................................... ............................... 10
Figure 4. Fencepost diagram analysis ............................................................ ............................... 17
Figure 5. Channel sediment characterization ................................................. ............................... 19
Figure 6. Rock, rubble, shell or sand reflector in the outer ebb shoal ........... ............................... 20
List of Tables
Table 1. Jetprobe refusal elevations ............................................................... ............................... 13
Table 2. 2009 and 2011 vibracore refusal elevations .................................... ............................... 14
Table 3. Vibracore color code scheme showing the range of sediment differentiation ................ 16
1
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
WIGGINS PASS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA:
GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW
List of Appendices
Appendix 1- Vibracore Logs
Appendix 2- Vibracore Photographs
Appendix 3- Individual Vibracore Granularmetric Reports
Appendix 4- Individual Vibracore Grain Size Distribution Curves /Histograms
Appendix 5- Fence Post Diagrams
Appendix 6- 2011 CPE Wiggins Pass Seismic Data (Digital Copy Only)
2
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
INTRODUCTION
Maintaining a navigation channel through Wiggins Pass is a high priority for Collier
County. The existing meander in the channel is detrimental to safe navigation and causes impacts
to the adjacent shoreline. In response to safety concerns, the County is pursuing a permit to
straighten the pass.
To characterize the sediment within the Wiggins Pass ebb shoal, flood shoal and
tributaries, Coastal Planning & Engineering Inc. (CPE) compiled and reviewed existing
geotechnical data. In 2009, following the review of existing data, ten (10) jet probes were
collected to determine the extent and depth of subsurface rock within the inlet and ebb shoal.
Based on the results of the jetprobe investigation, six (6) vibracores were collected to further
characterize the channel. Figure 1 shows the location of historic vibracores and the location of
the jet probes and vibracores collected by CPE in 2009. Figure 1 also shows the location of the
preliminary channel realignment and proposed cuts, developed in 2009. This alignment is
preliminary and will be refined during modeling, design and permitting.
Following the 2009 work, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP)
Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems (BBCS) requested an analysis of the geologic control on
the inlet that is provided by limestone, peat and/or clay substrata (Request for Additional
Information (RAI) dated March 24, 2010). In 2011, CPE collected geophysical (seismic
reflection profiling and bathymetric) and geotechnical (vibracore) data within the Wiggins Pass
flood and ebb shoals as a basis for addressing the substrate concerns raised by the FDEP. The
investigation plan was developed in coordination with CPE, the FDEP BBCS and Collier
County. The geophysical and geotechnical data that was collected in 2011 is shown in Figure 1.
GEOPHYSICAL AND GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
Investigation Details
In 2009, ten (10) jetprobes were conducted in the Wiggins Pass ebb shoal and flood
shoal. On August 12, 2009, six (6) widely- spaced vibracores were collected from the pass.
Following review of the jetprobes and analysis of the cores, the FDEP raised questions about the
nature of the substrate and whether or not it was acting as a geologic control to maintain the
position of the channel. To address these concerns, CPE collected geophysical data as well as
additional geotechnical data. Between August 10 and 11, 2011, a concurrent seismic reflection
profiling and bathymetric survey was conducted. During this survey, approximately 7.9 nautical
line miles of geophysical data was collected from the ebb shoal, flood shoal and tributaries.
Between August 17 and 18, 2011, sixteen (16) vibracores were collected from locations
determined in coordination with CPE, FDEP and Collier County. The geophysical and
geotechnical data collected in 2009 and 2011 is shown in Figure 1.
3
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
Equipment and Methods
The 2009 investigations included jetprobe and vibracore collection. The 2011
investigations included a concurrent bathymetric and seismic reflection profiling survey, as well
as determination of sediment composition and thickness via vibracoring. The geophysical and
geotechnical data was collected under the responsible charge of a professional geologist
registered in the state of Florida. The collection and processing of this data is described below.
The geophysical and geotechnical equipment used during the investigations is also described
below.
Navigation Systems
All navigation and survey control for the geophysical survey and positioning for
jetprobes and vibracores was conducted under the direction of a professional surveyor registered
in the State of Florida.
The navigation and positioning system used for this survey was a real -time kinematic
(RTK) global positioning system (GPS) with dual frequency receivers. A local RTK GPS base
station was deployed to provide high accuracy conditions to the receiver on the survey vessel.
The base station for the survey was set in Delnor- Wiggins State Park at a location that provided
the clear horizon needed to minimize phase- measurement effects caused by multi - pathing. The
base station position for the RTK GPS system was surveyed and established prior to survey
operations. Horizontal and vertical positioning checks were conducted at FDEP second order
monuments before and after the survey within the project area to confirm network and survey
accuracy as required by 5J -17 F.A.C. The base station transmits carrier phase and Doppler shift
corrections via radio link to a receiver onboard the survey vessel. The receiver on the survey
vessel can then apply the carrier phase and Doppler shift corrections to the position of the vessel
as measured by GPS satellites.
Hypack Inc.'s Hypack 2009/2010 ® Data Collection and Processing Program
Navigational, magnetometer, and depth sounder systems were interfaced with an onboard
computer, and the data was integrated in real time using Hypack Inc.'s Hypack 2009/2010®
software. Hypack 2009/2010® is a state -of -the -art navigation and hydrographic surveying
system. The location of the fish tow -point on the vessel in relation to the RTK GPS was
measured, recorded and entered into the Hypack 2009/2010® survey program. The length of
cable deployed between the tow -point and each towfish was also measured and entered into
Hypack 2009/2010®. Hypack 2009/2010® then takes these values and monitors the actual
position of each towfish in real time. Online screen graphic displays include the pre - plotted
survey lines, the updated boat track across the survey area, adjustable left/right indicator, as well
as other positioning information such as boat speed, quality of fix measured by Position Dilution
of Precision (PDOP), and line bearing. The digital data is merged with positioning data (RTK
GPS), video displayed and recorded to the acquisition computers hard disk for post processing
and/or replay.
Bathymetric Survey
The Odom Hydrographic Systems, Inc.'s Hydrotrac, a single frequency portable
hydrographic echo sounder, was used to perform the bathymetric survey. The Hydrotrac operates
5
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
at frequencies of 24, 33, 40, 200, 210, or 340 kHz and is a digital, survey -grade sounder. A 210
kHz transducer was used for the bathymetric survey.
Prior to the start of the survey, a reconnaissance survey of the second order FDEP
monuments was conducted to confirm that the survey control was in place and undisturbed. RTK
GPS was used to locate and confirm the survey control for this project. To achieve the required
accuracy, the hydrographic survey was controlled using second order FDEP monuments.
Horizontal and vertical RTK GPS positioning checks and sounder calibration were
performed periodically throughout the survey (typically at the beginning and end of each survey
day). The sounder was calibrated via bar - checks and a sound velocity probe. The DIGIBAR PRO
sound velocity meter is used to find the average sound velocity needed to calibrate the Hydrotrac
sounder prior to performing the bar - check. Bar checks were performed from a depth of 5 ft. to
the maximum depth of the survey area. Analog data showing the results of the bar check
calibration is displayed on the sounder charts at 5 ft. increments during descent of the bar.
Real -time navigation software ( Hypack) was used to provide navigation to the helm in
order to minimize deviation from the online azimuth. This software provides horizontal position
to the sounding data allowing real -time review of the data in plan view or cross section format. A
Trimble RTK GPS and a TSS Motion Compensator were used onboard the survey vessel to
provide instantaneous tide corrections as well as heave, pitch and roll corrections. Soundings
were collected at intervals sufficient to provide an accurate depiction of the seafloor. Cross lines
(tie lines) were collected to verify survey accuracies.
Upon completion of the field work, data was edited and reduced with CPE's internal
software programs and Hypack 2009/2010®. The observed tide data was compared to local
predictions and other regional gauges for verification purposes. The offshore raw digital data was
viewed and edited in Hypack 2009/2010®. Digitized data was scanned for noise and compared to
the analog record. False soundings were removed and a comma delimited ASCII file was created
and exported.
The bathymetric data collected in 2011 was used to determine seismic reflector
elevations. No bathymetric contour map or surface was created based on this survey.
Seismic Reflection Profile Surveys
"Chirp" sub -bottom seismic - reflection data is used to show sedimentary stratigraphy. The
use of chirp sub -bottom data allows common stratigraphic layers to be mapped throughout the
study area while determining the thickness and extent of those stratigraphic layers.
An EdgeTech X -STAR SB -216s was used to conduct the seismic reflection profile
surveys (Figure 2). The X -STAR Full Spectrum Sonar is a versatile wideband FM sub -bottom
profiler that collects digital normal incidence reflection data over many frequency ranges. This
instrumentation generates cross - sectional images of the seabed. The X -STAR SB -216s transmits
an FM pulse that is linearly swept over a full spectrum frequency range (also called a "chirp
pulse "). The tapered waveform spectrum results in images that have virtually constant resolution
6
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
with depth. The Chirp systems have an advantage over 3.5 kHz and "boomer" systems in
sediment delineation because the reflectors are more discrete and less susceptible to ringing from
both vessel and ambient noise. The full -wave rectified reflection horizons are cleaner and more
distinct than the half -wave rectified reflections produced by older analog systems.
The X -STAR SB -216s, the newest model in the EdgeTech suite of Chirp Full Spectrum
Sub -bottom towfish, differs from the older X -STAR SB -216 (which had four (4) 6" diameter
transducers) by having a single 13" diameter low frequency transducer and a single 6.5"
diameter high frequency transducer. The new low frequency transducer provides more low
frequency energy at all pulse settings, which allows deeper penetration of seafloor sediments
while at the same time maintaining the high resolution of the original configuration.
Figure 2. EdgeTech X -STAR SB -216s sub -bottom profiling system.
In order to minimize noise related to the survey vessel and sea conditions, the seismic
towfish (which operates as both the source and receiver for the sub -bottom system) was deployed
and towed behind the research vessel. The sub - bottom system was interfaced with RTK via
Hypack 2009/2010® navigational software. The location of the fish tow point (as referenced to
the RTK antenna), together with the length of cable deployed from the tow point, were entered
into Hypack 2009/2010® in order to account for the fish layback and provide accurate
positioning of the seismic fish during the survey. The sub -bottom system was operated by the
Discover -SBO software program. At the start of the sub - bottom profiling survey, the sweep
frequencies of the outgoing pulse together with the different gain settings available within
Discover -SBO were adjusted to obtain the best possible resolution for the survey. The data was
7
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
continuously bottom - tracked to allow for the application of real -time gain functions in order to
have an optimal in- the -field view of the data. Automatic gain control (AGC) was used to
normalize the data by strengthening quiet regions /soft returns while simultaneously
reducing/eliminating overly strong returns by obtaining a local average at a given point. A time -
varying gain (TVG) was used to increase the returning signal over time in order to reduce the
effects of signal attenuation.
All sub -bottom data was recorded on the acquisition computer's hard disk and transferred
to a USB memory stick and/or portable hard drive at the end of each survey day to back -up raw
survey data. A printed hardcopy of the data was also produced as the data was collected. Notes
regarding line name, time, event, and direction of collection were recorded for the beginning and
end of each survey trackline. Post collection processini of the seismic data was completed using
Chesapeake Technology, Inc's SonarWiz.MAP +SBP software. This software allows the user
to apply specific gains and settings in order to produce enhanced sub -bottom imagery that can
then be interpreted and digitized for specific stratigraphic facies relevant to the project goals.
The first data processing step was to calculate the approximate depth of the reflector
below the sound source by converting the two -way travel time (the time in milliseconds that it
takes for the "chirp pulse" to leave the source, hit the reflector and return to the source) to feet by
utilizing an approximate value for the speed of sound through both the water and underlying
geology. For this survey, a detailed hydrographic and geologic sound velocity structure was not
available, so CPE geophysicists used an estimated sound velocity of 1.6 meters per millisecond
(m/ms) in order to convert two -way travel time to feet. This estimate of the composite sound
velocity was based on several assumptions including the speed of sound through water which is
typically 1.5 m/ms as well as on the speed of sound through the sediment which can vary from
1.6 m/ms for unconsolidated sediment to >1.7 m/ms for limestone.
CPE geophysicists then processed the imagery to reduce noise effects (commonly due to
the vessel, sea state, or other natural and anthropogenic phenomenon) and enhance stratigraphy.
This was done using the processing features available in SonarWiz.MAP +SBP®; AGC, swell
filter, and a user - defined gain control (UGC). The SonarWiz.MAP +SBP® AGC is similar to the
Discover -SBO AGC feature, where the data are normalized in order to remove the extreme high
and low returns, while enhancing the contrast of the middle returns. In order to appropriately
apply the swell filter and UGC functions, the sub -bottom data was bottom - tracked to produce an
accurate baseline representation of the seafloor. Once this was done through a process of
automatic bottom tracking (based on the high - amplitude signal associated with the seafloor) and
manual digitization, the swell filter and UGC were applied to the data. The swell filter is based
on a ping averaging function that removes vertical changes in the data due to towfish movement
caused by the sea state. The swell filter was increased or decreased depending on the period and
frequency of the sea surface wave conditions, however, special care was taken during this phase
to not remove, or smooth over geologic features that are masked by the sea state noise. The final
step was to apply the UGC. The SonarWiz.MAP +SBP® UGC feature allows the user to define
amplitude gains based on either the depth below the source, or the depth below the seafloor. For
this survey, the UGC was adjusted so that the gain would increase with depth below the imaged
seafloor (and not the source), mimicking a time - varying gain. The user was able to remove the
8
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
noise within the water column, increase the contrast within the stratigraphy, and increase the
amplitude of the stratigraphy with depth, accounting for some of the signal attenuation normally
associated with sound penetration over time.
After data processing, sub - surface data interpretation was performed using
SonarWiz.MAP +SBP® software. Using the SonarWiz.MAP +SBP® platform, processed seismic
profile lines were opened to digitally display the recorded sub - surface stratigraphy. Using the
software's Sonar File Manager, color coded vibracores were added directly to the seismic
profiles. Each vibracore was plotted on the line that fell closest to its location. If a vibracore was
collected more than 50 ft. away from the closest seismic line, it was not plotted onto the seismic
record for correlation/interpretation purposes. In areas where the subsurface stratigraphy can
change suddenly over a short distance, it is impractical and potentially inaccurate to try to
correlate vibracores over 50 ft. away from as -run seismic data as they may not correlate to the
geophysical data due to natural undulations in the stratigraphy. By plotting distant cores on
seismic data one increases the potential of improperly interpreting the subsurface stratigraphy by
forcing the two (2) distant datasets to correlate when, in reality, they may not.
All seismic data was reviewed to determine if any stratigraphy within the vibracores was
discernable within the seismic stratigraphy. The shallow water depths in the study area presented
difficulties in geophysical data collection, requiring the use of a shallow -draft vessel and smaller
geophysical system. In some cases, the water depth prevented vessel access to portions of the
study area, including large portions of the nearshore ebb shoal. Where the depth of the water
column was sufficient for boat access, high resolution seismic data was limited by the small
relative distance between the towfish and the seafloor. These conditions required the use of the
smaller, higher- frequency EdgeTech 216s towfish deployed from a small vessel, effectively
limiting the seismic penetration and quality when compared to the use of the standard, lower -
frequency EdgeTech 5121 towfish. This reduction in seismic signal penetration due to shallow
water conditions was further exacerbated by significant signal attenuation due to coarse ebb and
flood shoal geologic materials.
Vibracore Survey
Vibracores were collected to characterize the physical properties of the sediment within
Wiggins Pass and groundtruth the seismic data. Prior to collecting vibracores in State waters for
this investigation, CPE was required to apply for a vibracore de minimus exemption. A de
minimus exemption is issued in lieu of a permit, when the proposed activity will have
insignificant impacts. In order to obtain a de minimus exemption, a Joint Environmental
Resource Permit (ERP) application was submitted to the FDEP BBCS for review. This
application required a general project description and a map outlining the area of investigation
within which the proposed vibracoring would take place. The application was also forwarded to
the Bureau of Survey and Mapping, Division of State Lands, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) and the Florida Division of Historical Resources (SHPO) for review and comment. A
de minimus exemption was granted by BBCS on August 3, 2011 to collect up to twenty (20)
vibracores in an effort to identify sediment quality within areas of possible channel realignment
of Wiggins Pass. As a condition of the de minimus exemption, all cores were required to be
collected within 50 ft. of the as -run remote sensing survey tracklines.
9
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
Vibracores were collected by Athena Technologies Inc. using Athena's custom designed
and built vibracore system deployed from a sampling platform (Figure 3). Athena's system
consists of a generator with a mechanical vibrator attached via cable. The vibrator is attached
directly to a 3 -inch diameter, galvanized sample barrel. The sample barrel is lowered to the
seafloor through a moonpool in the deck of the sampling platform by attaching lengths of drill
stem. The vibracore machine is then turned on and the sample barrel is allowed to penetrate until
it reaches target depth or refusal. Vibracoring was conducted off the RVArtemis.
Upon removal of the vibracores, they were measured, marked and cut into 5 -ft. sections.
The cores were then labeled, and transported to CPE's office in Boca Raton, Florida. There, the
vibracores were split and logged by describing sedimentary properties by layer in terms of layer
thickness, color, texture (grain size), composition and presence of clay, silt, gravel, or shell and
any other identifying features. Wet Munsell color was determined in accordance with American
Society for Testing and Materials Standard Materials Designation D2488 -00 for description and
identification of soils (visual - manual procedure) (ASTM, 2009). The vibracores were digitally
photographed against an 18% gray background. This is the standard reference value against
which all camera light meters are calibrated. Use of an 18% gray background is preferred by the
FDEP as it provides a known reference color. Sediment samples were obtained from irregular
intervals based on distinct layers in the sediment sequence. The unsampled half of each core was
then archived.
Figure 3. Athena electric vibracore system.
Sediment Grain Size (Mechanical) Analysis. During sieve analysis the wet, dry and washed
Munsell colors were noted. Sieve analyses were conducted on all sediment samples in
accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials Standard Materials Designation
D422 -63 for particle size analysis of soils (ASTM, 2007). This method covered the quantitative
determination of the distribution of sand size particles. For sediment finer than the No. 230 sieve
(4.0 phi) the ASTM Standard Test Method, Designation D1140 -00 was followed (ASTM, 2006).
Mechanical sieving was accomplished using calibrated sieves with a gradation of half phi
10
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
intervals. Additional sieves representing key ASTM sediment classification boundaries were
included to meet FDEP standards. Weights retained on each sieve were recorded cumulatively.
Grain size data were entered into the gINTO software program, which computes the mean
and median grain size, sorting, and silt/clay percentages for each sample using the moment
method (Folk, 1974). Granularmetric reports and grain size distribution curves were compiled for
each sample.
RESULTS
Review of Existing Data
The historic data that was compiled in 2009 is discussed below. Note that the historic
vibracore logs reference different vertical datums. Some of the cores are referenced to Mean Sea
Level (MSL) while others are referenced to NGVD29 or NAVD88. For some cores, a datum was
not provided. Where possible, the elevations have been converted to NAVD88 in the text for
consistency. The 1979 USACE and 2006 Humiston and Moore vibracores have been included in
the discussions below to provide a general characterization of the Wiggins Pass ebb shoal, flood
shoal and tributaries. However, it should be noted that these cores should not be used in any
future design work.
1979 USACE Vibracores
In 1979, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE) collected borings from Wiggins
Pass. Five (5) borings (CB -WP -1, IA, 113, 2 and 3) were collected from the ebb shoal. The
vibracore logs for these borings are presented in Appendix 1. Munsell Colors, silt content and
mean grain size are not provided. The five (5) borings collected from the ebb shoal indicate that
the uppermost 13 -15 ft. is predominantly fine - grained, shelly quartz sand that is tan to gray in
color. The easternmost boring from the ebb shoal has 6.0 ft. of shell underlain by fine- grained,
shelly, quartz sand. Two (2) cores within the ebb shoal (CB -WP -IA and CB- WP -1B) have a
limestone layer at an elevation of approximately -10.0 ft. MSL ( -10.2 ft. NAVD88). This
limestone is likely of limited extent since it only appears in two (2) of the five (5) cores.
1990 Coastal Engineering Consultants
In 1990, Coastal Engineering Consultants (CEC) identified a rock ledge located at an
elevation of -7.0 to -10.0 ft. NGVD29 ( -7.4 to -10.4 ft. NAVD88) at the entrance of the inlet.
The approximate location of this ledge is shown in Figure 1. This ledge was considered a
significant geological feature in 1990, and was used to restrict dredging and the channel location
for the inlet.
2006 Humiston and Moore Vibracores
In 2006, Humiston and Moore collected six (6) vibracores (WP- 06 -01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and
06) from the Wiggins Pass tributaries. The vibracore logs, photographs, granularmetric reports
and grain size distribution curves are provided in Appendices 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Munsell
colors are provided on the vibracore logs. It is assumed that they represent wet conditions. It
appears that dry and washed Munsell colors were not determined. These vibracores indicate that
the uppermost 2 to 4 ft. of sediment in the tributaries is predominantly gray, fine- grained, quartz
11
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
sand with trace silt, trace shell fragments and trace whole shell. Shell increases from trace to
little in cores WP -06 -04 and 05 which are both located at the junction between the tributaries.
Underlying material is coarser grained and brown in color. Median grain size increases with
depth. Organic content also increases with depth. Color ranges from gray towards the surface to
brown at depth. Since the top of core elevations are approximate, these cores should not be used
in any future design work.
Results of the 2009 and 2011 Investigations
The results of the geophysical and geotechnical investigations conducted by CPE in 2009
and 2011 are discussed below.
2009 CPE Jetprobes
Ten (10) jetprobes were conducted by CPE in 2009 to investigate the extent of the rock
substrate identified by CEC in 1990. The 2009 jetprobe investigation was limited to the ebb
shoal and a small portion of the flood shoal. Nine (9) were conducted within the ebb shoal
(WPJP- 09 -01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 09 and 10) and one (1) was conducted within the flood
shoal (WPJP- 09 -08). They encountered rock refusal at elevations ranging from -8.2 ft. to -21.7
ft. NAVD88 (Table 1). WPJP -09 -07 and WPJP -09 -03 did not encounter refusal. The jetprobes
conducted by CPE in the ebb shoal may indicate the presence of a rock ledge that extends across
the mouth of Wiggins Pass. The rock is shallowest along the margins of the current channel and
deepest within the channel. One (1) of the jetprobes (WPJP- 09 -01) corresponds to the rock ledge
identified by CEC in 1990. This probe encountered refusal at -10.2 ft. NAVD88, which is in
close agreement with the elevation of the CEC rock ledge ( -7.4 ft. to -10.4 ft. NAVD88). The
single jetprobe conducted in the flood shoal met refusal at an elevation of -21.7 ft. NAVD88.
It is important to note that jetprobes provide limited information. In this case they only
provide information on the elevation at which refusal occurred. Although refusal is generally
attributed to rock, the nature of the rock cannot be determined by the jetprobes. Refusal could be
caused by a massive rock unit, a stiff clay unit, a rock fragment layer of limited extent or a single
rock fragment.
12
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
Table 1. Jetprobe refusal elevations.
ID Refusal (ft. NAVD88)
WPJP -09 -01
Rock Refusal at -10.2
WPJP -09 -02
Rock Refusal at -14.1
WPJP -09 -03
No Refusal at -23.7
WPJP -09 -04
Rock Refusal at -10.3
WPJP -09 -05
Rock Refusal at -8.7
WPJP -09 -06
Rock Refusal at -8.2
WPJP -09 -07
No Refusal at -23.1
WPJP -09 -08
Rock Refusal at -21.7
WPJP -09 -09
Rock Refusal at -14.0
WPJP -09 -10
Rock Refusal at -12.5
2009 and 2011 CPE Vibracores
In 2009, based on the results of the jetprobe survey, CPE collected six (6) widely spaced
vibracores. Two (2) were collected from the ebb shoal, three (3) were collected from the flood
shoal and one (1) was collected from the tributaries. In 2011, CPE collected sixteen (16)
additional vibracores. The locations of the vibracores were selected based on consultation with
the FDEP. Six (6) vibracores were collected from the ebb shoal and ten (10) vibracores were
collected from the flood shoal. The vibracore logs, photographs, granularmetric reports and
grain size distribution curves/histograms for the 2009 and 2011 vibracores are provided in
Appendices 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Refusal elevations are provided in Table 2.
13
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
Table 2. Elevation of Refusal.
Vibracore ID Refusal Elevation
(ft. NAVD88)
WPVC -09 -01 No Refusal
WPVC -09 -02 No Refusal
WPVC -09 -03
No Refusal
WPVC -09 -04
No Refusal
WPVC -09 -05
No Refusal
WPVC -09 -06
Rock Refusal at -14.0
WPVC -11 -01
No Refusal
WPVC -11 -02
No Refusal
WPVC -11 -03
No Refusal
WPVC -11 -04
Rock Refusal at -19.4
WPVC -11 -05
Rock Refusal at -15.0
WPVC -11 -06
No Refusal
WPVC -11 -07
No Refusal
WPVC -11 -08
Rock Refusal at -20.6
WPVC -11 -09
Rock Refusal at —23.4
WPVC -11 -10
Rock Refusal at -13.9
WPVC -11 -11
No Refusal
WPVC -11 -12
No Refusal
WPVC -11 -13
Rock Refusal at -19.8
WPVC -11 -14
No Refusal
WPVC -11 -15
No Refusal
WPVC -11 -16
Rock Refusal at -17.3
Note: The term "rock refusal" refers to refusal caused by rock fragments greater than or equal to 1.5
inches in diameter.
The eight (8) vibracores collected from the ebb shoal (WPVC -09 -05 and 06, WPVC -11-
02, 03, 04, 05, 06 and 07) indicate that sediment within the ebb shoal ranges from shelly to silty.
The shell content is highest towards the surface of the shoal where there is shell hash, Shelly sand
and/or trace to some shell (in the form of whole shell and shell fragments). This shelly layer
ranges in thickness from 1.5 ft. to 8 ft. It is thickest directly adjacent to the existing channel
14
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
(vibracores WPVC- 11 -05, 06 and 07) and thins away from the channel. The shell is typically
underlain by a fine - grained sand layer that ranges from 0.5 ft. to 5.6 ft. thick. This layer
typically contains trace fines and may contain trace wood fragments or trace rock fragments.
This layer is underlain by sand containing little to some fines. Six (6) vibracores indicate the
presence of isolated rock fragments throughout the ebb shoal. These vibracores have trace to
little rock fragments at elevations ranging from -4.2 ft. NAVD88 to -16.4 ft. NAVD88. It is
important to note that rock is in the form of isolated rock fragments. The 2009 and 2011
vibracores show no evidence of a continuous rock layer. With the exception of one (1) vibracore
(WPVC- 11 -06) all of the vibracores collected from the ebb shoal contain trace wood fragments
below an elevation of -5.2 ft. NAVD88. One (1) core within the ebb shoal (WPVC- 11 -04) also
has a 0.5 ft. thick layer of peat. This is the only core within the ebb shoal that contained peat.
There is a 1.4 ft. thick, black (wet Munsell value of 2.5) organic clay layer from -9.6 ft. to -11.0
ft. NAVD88 in WPVC -11 -06 and a 0.4 ft. thick black (wet Munsell value of 2.5) organic sand
layer from -8.9 ft. to -9.3 ft. NAVD88. These organic layers are not continuous, as they only
appear in two (2) of the eight (8) vibracores collected in the ebb shoal.
The thirteen (13) vibracores collected within the flood shoal (WPVC- 09 -02, 03 and 04,
WPVC- 11 -01, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16) indicate that sediment in the flood shoal is
predominantly fine - grained, quartz sand with trace silt, trace shell hash, trace shell fragments and
trace whole shell. Shell content and mean grain size are highest towards the surface of the flood
shoal and decrease with depth. Organics are lowest towards the surface of the flood shoal and
increase with depth. There are isolated rock fragments found at elevations between -1.1 ft. to -
23.8 ft. NAVD88. With the exception of a single core located on the western side of the flood
shoal (WPVC- 09 -04), which has a 0.9 ft. thick organic clay layer at an elevation of -7.8 ft.
NAVD88, there is no evidence of a continuous layer of organic clay. Additionally, there is no
evidence of a continuous layer of peat. There is isolated peat in the form of pockets and lamina
containing little peat between -9.8 ft. and -14 ft. NAVD88.
The single core (WPVC- 09 -01) collected from the tributaries, indicates that material in
the northernmost tributary is predominantly fine- grained quartz sand with trace silt. The
uppermost 0.6 ft. contains trace shell fragments and trace shell hash. Organics increase with
depth. There is a 1.9 ft. black (wet Munsell color value of 2.5) organic clay layer with a mean
grain size of 0.18 mm at an elevation of -7.0 ft. NAVD88. The wet Munsell color values
(excluding the organic clay layer) range from 3 to 6, with a typical value of 5. Mean grain size
varies from 0.18 mm to 0.22 mm.
CPE reviewed the 2009 and 2011 vibracore logs for sediment quality. Table 3 lists the
criteria for color coding the vibracores.
15
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
Table 3. Vibracore color code scheme showing the range of sediment differentiation.
Color Code Description
Green Sand ( <5% fines, may include trace ( <10 %) rock fragments)
Light Green Sand (5 -10% fines, may include trace ( <10 %) rock fragments)
Yellow Sand (10 -20% fines, may include trace ( <10 %) rock fragments)
Purple Shelly Sand (may include trace ( <10 %) rock fragments)
Tan Peat and Organics (may include trace ( <10 %) rock fragments)
Orange Organic Clay (may include trace ( <10 %) rock fragments)
Cyan Clay (may include trace ( <10 %) rock fragments)
Dark Blue Rock or Rock Fragments ( >10% rock or rock fragments)
Fence post diagrams were created to provide cross section views of the ebb shoal and
flood shoal. The locations of these cross section views are depicted in Figure 4. A series of
eleven (11) diagrams designated A -A' through K -K' were created and are presented in Appendix
5. Six (6) of these diagrams cover the ebb shoal (A -A', B -B', C -C', D -D', E -E' and F -F').
Although there is no obvious correlation between the cores shown on these fence post diagrams,
several general trends can be seen. The various sediment types are interbedded and occur in
patches throughout the ebb shoal. These diagrams indicate that the ebb shoal typically contains
Shelly material (shell hash, shelly sand or sand with >10% shell) overlying fine- grained sand
with variable amounts of fines (5 -10% fines). There are isolated pockets of rock (>10% rock
fragments) throughout the ebb shoal. Although the layers containing rock fragments do not
appear to correlate, they are most abundant to the north and to the south of the current channel.
Based on the fence diagrams, it appears that the northern portion of the ebb shoal (immediately
north of the existing channel) is slightly siltier than the portion of the ebb shoal that is south of
the existing channel. The portion of the ebb shoal that is immediately north of the current
channel also contains more shell than other parts of the ebb shoal. There is a single occurrence
of peat (a 0.5 ft. thick layer in WPVC- 11 -04) and a single occurrence of organic clay (a 0.9 ft.
thick layer in WPVC- 09 -04) within the ebb shoal. Because these sediment types each occur in
only one (1) core, they likely represent isolated pockets.
16
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
A series of four (4) diagrams designated A -A', 13-13', C -C' and D -D' show east -west
cross sections across the flood shoal. Diagrams J -J', K -K' and G -G' show north -south trending
cross sections across the flood shoal. Like the ebb shoal, the flood shoal is typically comprised of
shelly material overlying fine- grained sand with variable silt and clay contents (trace to little; 0-
20%). The silt content increases towards the tributaries. These diagrams also show the presence
of a shelly deposit to the south of the pass.
Two (2) fencepost diagrams were created to characterize the tributaries. It is important to
note that these two (2) diagrams are based on the 2006 Humiston and Moore vibracores, which
are not being used for design. These profiles indicate that sediment in the tributaries is
predominantly Shelly material overlying sand. The silt content increases towards the east into
the middle tributary.
2011 CPE Geophysical Investigations
After interpreting the seismic data collected within Wiggins Pass in 2011, several
acoustic reflectors of interest were identified. Within the flood shoal, the top of a possible
organic clay layer was identified (Line _12_1— of_2). However, the reflector was faint and
difficult to identify in some locations. This of
was partially correlated with nearby
collected vibracores (WPVC- 09 -04), with some vertical offsets resulting from horizontal offsets
between the core location and as -run seismic trackline locations. The presence of this reflector
appeared to be laterally restricted within the vicinity of the flood shoal. This reflector is shown in
Figure 5 and represents the base of sand. As shown in Figure 5, the elevation of the base of sand
ranges from -8 ft. to -23 ft. NAVD88, with the deepest elevation in the existing channel and the
shallowest directly adjacent to the current point bar. The sand above this reflector is
predominantly fine grained sand with trace silt and trace to some shell hash.
An unknown reflector was identified in the outer ebb shoal. This reflector is shown in
Figures 5 and 6. The acoustic signature of this reflector is indicative of a coarse material,
possibly shell hash or rock rubble. However, since no cores were collected in the outer ebb
shoal, the nature of this reflector cannot be verified. Reflector elevations range from — 6 ft.
NAVD88 at the channel margins to -27 ft. NAVD88 in the outer ebb shoal (within the existing
dredge template). There appears to be a topographic high just north of WPJP- 09 -10, where the
elevation of the reflector rises to -7 ft. NAVD88. The adjacent jetprobes (WPJP -09 -09 and 10)
met refusal at -14 and -12.5 ft. NAVD88 respectively. This indicates that this "hill" may
represent an area where coarse material dredged from the existing dredge template has been
disposed.
In addition to the two (2) reflectors identified and shown in Figure 5, the seismic data
indicates the presence of large volumes of coarse shell -hash and shelly sands throughout the
flood shoal deposit.
Upon the completion of processing, all of the seismic data was then exported as a "Web"
based project of HTML /JPEG files viewable in any standard web browser software package
(Appendix 6). A trackline map is also provided in Appendix 6.
18
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
DISCUSSION
Channel Sediment Characterization
The 2009 and 2011 CPE vibracores and the 2011 geophysical data were used to
characterize the sediment within Wiggins Pass.
Although the 1979 USACE vibracores and the 2006 Humiston and Moore vibracores were
used to help characterize the sediment in Wiggins pass, they should not be used in any future
design work. The 1979 USACE vibracores are too old to meet current FDEP standards and none
of the cores meet the FDEP's current preference for 80% recovery. They are also missing mean
grain size, Munsell color and silt content information. The 2006 Humiston and Moore vibracores
are missing a vertical datum. Although a vertical datum of NGVD29 was provided as an
addendum to the vibracore logs, the original datum is not clear and the elevations are listed as
approximate.
Geophysical and geotechnical data within the preliminary channel alignment was
reviewed to provide a rough approximation of the distribution of sediment within Wiggins Pass.
Five (5) sediment types were identified. They are sand ( <5% fines), sediment containing 5 to
20% fines; clay, rock (in the form of rock fragments) and shelly sediment. Currently, the
preferred placement of sand dredged from the channel realignment is the adjacent beach. Shelly
sand will be used to fill in the old channel meander. Sand with 5 to 20% fines will be placed in
the nearshore. Sediment that is deemed unsuitable by the FDEP (i.e. rock or sediment with
>20% fines) will be taken to an upland disposal facility. Figure 5 shows the characterization of
sediment within the preliminary channel alignment. Areas that have not been filled on Figure 5
contain sediment that is suitable for beach placement.
SUMMARY /RECOMMENDATIONS
During this investigation, CPE geologists reviewed existing geotechnical data and
collected geophysical data and additional geotechnical data in 2009 and 2011. A review of the
vibracore and seismic data, indicates that the Wiggins Pass ebb shoal, flood shoal and tributaries
are predominantly fine- grained sand with pockets of shelly sediment (shelly sand or shell hash),
organic clay and rock fragments. The seismic and vibracore data indicate that these sediment
types do not occur in continuous layers, which is consistent with reworked sediments associated
with inlets. With the exception of a single core (WPVC- 11 -04) there is no evidence of a peat
deposit. Since this is the only core that had peat (a 0.5 ft. thick layer), it is likely an isolated
occurrence in Wiggins Pass. Additionally, no continuous rock layer was found within the inlet.
No controlling feature was identified directly adjacent to the current channel alignment.
LITERATURE CITED
ASTM, 2009. Standard practice for description and identification of soils (visual - manual
21
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
procedure), designation D2488 -09a. 2009 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, volume
04.08: Soil and Rock; Building Stones; Geotextiles. Philadelphia: American Society for
Testing Materials.
ASTM, 2007. Standard method for particle -size analysis of soils, designation D422 -63.
2007 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 04.08: Soil and Rock; Building Stones;
Geotextiles. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing Materials.
ASTM, 2006. Standard methods for amount of material in soils finer than No. 200 (75 um)
sieve, designation D 1140 -00. 2006 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 04.08: Soil
and Rock; Building Stones; Geotextiles. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing
Materials.
Folk, R.L., 1974. The Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Austin, Texas: Hemphill, 182p.
22
COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC.
A SHAW GROUP COMPANY
APPENDIX OVERVIEW
Introduction: These appendices contain the geotechnical data that was collected for use in the
Wiggins Pass Channel Realignment Project. Vibracores were collected from Wiggins Pass
Collier County, Florida in 1979, 2006, 2009 and 2011. The 1979 USACE cores and the 2006
Humiston & Moore cores have been provided for general characterization purposes only. They
have not been used in the design. The vibracore data is provided in the form of vibracores logs,
vibracore photographs, granularmetric reports, grain size distribution curves/histograms and
fencepost diagrams. Vibracore photographs, granularmetric reports and grain size distribution
curves/histograms are not available for the 1979 USACE vibracores. Siesmic reflection profiling
data is provided in the digital report copy only.
1) Vibracore Logs
Laboratory and descriptive information for each vibracore is presented on the log sheets.
Unified Soils Classification terminology is used in the core layer descriptions and key grain size
information (mean grain size, fines content and sorting) for each vibracore sample is presented
under the Remarks column. Multiple layer intervals are sometimes represented by a single
sample. The Box or Sample column is used to identify the specific sample that represents a
specific layer.
A) 1979 USACE Vibracores
Five (5) historic vibracores were collected during an investigation conducted in 1979, and
their log sheets are presented in this sub - appendix.
B) 2006 Humiston & Moore Vibracores
Six (6) historic vibracores were collected during an investigation conducted in 2006, and
their log sheets are presented in this sub - appendix.
C) 2009 CPE Vibracores
Six (6) vibracores were collected in 2009 for use in this project and their log sheets are
presented in this sub - appendix.
D) 2011 CPE Vibracores
Sixteen (16) vibracores were collected in 2011 for use in this project and their log sheets
are presented in this sub - appendix.
2) Vibracore Photographs
Photographs of the 2006, 2009 and 2011 vibracores collected from Wiggins Pass, are presented
here.
A) 2006 Humiston & Moore Vibracore Photographs
Photographs of vibracores collected in 2006 are presented here.
B) 2009 CPE Vibracore Photographs
Photographs of vibracores collected in 2009 are presented here.
C) 2011 CPE Vibracore Photographs
Photographs of vibracores collected in 2011 are presented here.
3) Individual Vibracore Granularmetric Reports
This appendix contains individual grain size distribution curves/histograms for the vibracore
samples collected in 2006, 2009 and 2011.
A) 2006 Humiston & Moore Individual Vibracore Granularmetric Reports
This sub - appendix contains individual granularmetric reports for the vibracore samples
collected in 2006.
B) 2009 CPE Individual Vibracore Granularmetric Reports
This sub - appendix contains individual granularmetric reports for the vibracore samples
collected in 2009.
C) 2011 CPE Individual Vibracore Granularmetric Reports
This sub - appendix contains individual granularmetric reports for the vibracore samples
collected in 2011.
4) Individual Vibracore Grain Size Distribution Curves/Histograms
This appendix contains individual grain size distribution curves/histograms for the vibracore
samples collected in 2006, 2009 and 2011.
A) 2006 Humiston & Moore Individual Vibracore Grain Size Distribution Curves
This sub - appendix contains individual grain size distribution curves for the vibracore
samples collected in 2006.
B) 2009 CPE Individual Vibracore Grain Size Distribution Curves /Histograms
This sub - appendix contains individual grain size distribution curves/histograms for the
vibracore samples collected in 2009.
C) 2011 CPE Individual Vibracore Grain Size Distribution Curves/Histograms
This sub - appendix contains individual grain size distribution curves /histograms for the
vibracore samples collected in 2011.
5) Fencepost Diagrams
Fencepost diagrams that were created to provide cross sectional views of the ebb and flood
shoals are presented in this appendix.
6) 2011 CPE Wiggins Pass Seismic Data (Digital Copy Only)
This appendix includes seismic records collected in Wiggins Pass. The files are in HTML format
and are therefore only included in digital format. A map showing the location of the 2011
geophysical tracklines is also included in this appendix.
APPENDIX 1
Vibracore Logs
1979 USACE Vibracores
DMLLING LOG t}rN1
South Atlantic
rtriktatr netr�
i „ajVMRTff„41e. [„,�#MELYNKtl.
O$Aa F��hi YCp4'. 1Y
T. T,I,IC�gME533}# OYXREWRG
Stiff OR BARREL
A
S. "PTM MLLGO INTO NOpt
9. TOTAL OEPFN.OF NOLS; 13.51
ELEVATi ON IlfTN
LEGEND CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
�Fi@P�tl#iY
6 It
r
SPLIT SPOON Pus
1'e District
TOTAL NUMBER LORE BOXES
ELEVATION GROI&Rii MATER
9TARTEO
pATR NOLt
IM/
P"VATIt1N TOO Of IiULR
TOTAL CORE.RKCAYtRY FaR
r:
v)wtsttalt
DRILLING i• r ouch ,At Lpt3G
IlttLt AT1o3I' 0
Jacksonville E�� tr t
k. PROJECT
WIGGINS PASS
� sax•
Ml. Slit, wNO YYPE OP T mar
�y. u>+ � �,
X. LOCATl4NZCaww.. o
a } RE SEINU
M M
.
a. DRILLING xrM.0 r
, x tENiNATOO Of ORILL
Acker
r
s Enlineers,
i#end
....
HOLE NO, n (A. .h ... WW* aae!
aCnd ta tty nn x
4? L NO. DO OVER. It�areAt cap YNWa£UNOSSC
OUNOR t
SAMPLES TAKE"
C CB-WPl A
5. NAmi Of ORILL-�R
t4 TOTAL NUMUER COAB. En Vt
R. GORDON
is ELEVATtO)# CNCtuxa!*AVER 7 da
S. DIRECTION OP HOLE
[jY�BwreGxCENC 6t.ED _ . . .
N$. ]wTt }OLE
It me rBt9... EC.SMYn6R43Cb
1/11/79 1/11/79
7. TIiiCKNES3 OF OVt:R.$ij,(OEN
M ELEVATION TOP OP HOLE •• �..
-
s. OEPTR ORMLED wto ROCK
lo:. TOTAL tORS NECOVE#8Y£OR. UORINt'i. :} g,
9, TOTAL OE-TH Of ROLE... 15,...0'
t� ,!� t+
R R T : P-OL. -. 16
£LEVATtbN
O£ "TN LCOERO CLAWPSCATtoa OV WAYERIA"
{p'., C3P8to.d
%CORE sawmw Aeu^RKS
RECOy SAMPLE iA'h3tt23nR rFmtl, *k+1"tu.., d.Pttt �t
d
Ear NO L »wtr.rt�to .tom, It.e��
. ,
BIT OR BARREL
BIS /0.5 ft.
w
Vitas
SAND, fine, quartz, tan,
N'-RODS
Shelly (SIB)
-10.5
-10.7
a.7 LINSTONE, hard, gray
IOCI 1
W She
#-RODS
.. SAND, fine, quartz, tarp,
slightly Shelly (5)
50 2
• �'
4
i
i
�20'PO
15. ` •
-20.0
NOTES
hammer with 30A
1140#
1. SAMPLES
SAND OBTAINED FROM WASH
Of
drop used on 2.0' split
MATER.
Spoon. i1 -3/8" I, I. X
Btt O..D.
c tr E
. � . 18 3 6 rvtst t� (E3rtDH9 ARE, S?$SL7LET£.
I
d
PAtC ' PLATE
ieY rr� >I� Ai �r 1D
DkiLLING
Corps of Fp jnea r-a
HOLE
iiiftFCT174F U °ti7bk:.s # y i T, 4 µ.._
y�
If, OAT" §3C5
I 7
,.� riP�
ii, t. %. Vhi'9 i�>i erFg 6P 4d`x.f 1 e�
YNICx tti OF ovep -lvo)1 FN
CLAD #FCC
cra 0 r x DEPT" a Vr wi OF MA eRAL, a
1!!7t — (
d R-.11"?
-7.0 01
SA IM), fine, quartz. gray
(SP) S 1
-9.0
.3 LIME TIE Ysari r Y....._..__. M
H SAND, fine, quartz, gray
(S)
So f
-20.0 13. ui
NOTES:
1. SAMPLES OF SAND
TAKEN FP 's WASH WA TM
War
-? -1,
1 Me- WWI 3111"
dvon ""(0 Sri e ,o' split
IX X
��'0i0�)
no_• no, t._a —tYY –G 4
cllulSl+
} #ST4Y44ATPpN
Si1tCT
DRILL114G LM South Atlantic
Jacksonville District
$F1 sf4 r
f. f'RG2 GT
W S_2$ AMO TY EMIT_
WIGGINS PASS
, . v r 4 N Al ar
�X. LqC{J _2 6?a1u+ra5+n0 ` wr o+t �ryr.t S
_B _..
+�l
F't#:t
+ p'
6I ♦
„,«..,,,,• .�
#2 YANHU PiCT5. RtR'S OFSIGHA TYSR Of' BRILL
S. DRI14I5 GS{1Q YcY
AckerAcker
,__Eorps of Engineers
P$. TOTAL. RU, �T 6VER- 013"Ck1Ml MB.b � fBif Eal lT6AR nx(t
!
R. fIOL$ Y40) rAi -h—, .. ;F—l" x1#4.1
..W fit. .—b.0
_ UR @.ER SAMPLES TAKFN I
- iP-
__.
y« RAf4R �F iPRl4 L.EFI
14« TOTAL NUMBER CORY? BOXES
R. GORDON
15v CLJE dATiO4 0MOUNO WATER Tidal
' PIREC71Oi OF PMOLE
Y.Y.YEr:4e. MMC4YpR_'x o %. FRai•Y aKRY.
Own! TK xcfL
sxAR`a
__ -
• jSv ATtQN TcW OF NO"
3« T{�1G44WF19 iii i?YK RI4it YAP
'.«
fig, °:.
T AS«KCf1V!'RY iftYYt R4hYYYti 33
'_G ORC !#
Q, iE4''TYt f�fi Yf„4M:D Yff'�{,x Yd4Crt
^,,. _,.•.•�.•....,-,
iq.
m. YoTA4 ovprYM of 4Moix 13.51
E Y
+ R
i; MAN
'4+d1'ti6il
�4�Yf�E�ATM4}fp _!f 12xT�RYAR.S �
I% T41 BGENtl i Sr:MCtt ltMhi
ARMOLE
M��►MANK9 .•.».
fb #pt4nax ,f w+AYaitofe� dr#.Ad
Y
�
w�rMftrrfegp. ♦Ya, Oi .fitni_fawxtlP
p
Bit ot- Harrel
.,.' HELL. sandy
�
SPLIT SPOON PuskefL �
:..
30
1
.
e
Pushed
341
I4 ffi
w
..3�f .0 5
.m
33
3
Ra i4YY
m5
-10.5
36
4
YY A##
- 12.43
6.01
SAND, fire, quartz, gray, 341
5
l2
slightly silty, (SP)
-13.5 10
6
R K
1
20
6
7
-15.0 8 '-
543
r7
" P,
-15.5
RA
#P Ei
♦
50
8
(l
-18.0
.1.
30
� R _ 44
=1�.6
13.5...
•1g.5 '�(� -_
140# hammer with 3011
drop used on 2.01 splii
spoon. (1 -3/8" I.B. X
C. FORM l a u
.f PLAU 21D
WRILLIK LOG [v i th Atlantic
". PROJECr
WIOOINS PASS
+9.R "T:C4L 1"CLANW"
r,. 'THICKNESS ON OVERBURDEN
L DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK
at"" HOUC 7..�t "_...
ELEVATION UVPTM t.E.GENd CLA53I
r
-7.5
thLLAIWM
Jacksonville
size #AD Tvl or I
ar�c,a V
OP
BIT OR BARREL
M®
14C FORM 18 36 "oeviou3 F—DONS 9 OBSOLEre. `vnvaEcr I PLATE 220
1 WIGGINS PASS
-1.3 vs#jv.J IL. i
Pushed
20
l
SPLIT SPOON
%ELLS, sanely
-9.0
30
-1 tt.5 8
30
3
5
IJ
0 10
SAND, fine, quartz, tan
-13.5 7
(SP)
N II 3
fi
30
5
5
-15 0
4
140# hammer with 0°
drop used on 2.0` split
spoon, (1 -3J01' I.D. X '
i
21, O.O.)
1
1
i
B
14C FORM 18 36 "oeviou3 F—DONS 9 OBSOLEre. `vnvaEcr I PLATE 220
1 WIGGINS PASS
2006 Humiston & Moore Vibracores
Core WP -06 -01
Core top elevation approximately -6.9' NGVD'29
DRILLING LOG' ...... —
Atlantic
i�)iggins Pass, October 2006
z Locmum (Coordin a ies or Station)
385858.01E, 712073 . 85N, NAD83
3. DRILLING AGENCY
Athena Technologies
4. HOLE NO.(As shown on drawing title NVP-06-01
and title number)
Hole No. WP-06-01
I 1Nb1ALLA11VN SHEET I OF 1 SHEETS I
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF SIT 3" Vibracore
ll.D
.Irt" ��TumfakouEvxiio—N SHOWN TBM or MSL
NIA
112.MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OFDRILL
Athena Technologies Vibracore System
Id ioTi1 NO. 6F 6Ni6is-mbEN " 1 DISTURBED -'- iUNDISTURBED
j SAMPLESTAKEN j 0 0 i
114 TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES I
5. NAME OF DRILLER
Sexton 115. ELEVATION GROUND WATER Tidal
1COMPLETED
116. DATE HOLE 31 OCT 06 31 OCT 061
-i. DIRECTION OFA&E' STARTED
F-_,I _DEG. FROM VER-tf�j-
xi VERTICAL INCLINED 7. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE 8.3' Water Denth
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN N/A
8. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0
9. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE in 51
9. SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR
ELEVATION I DEPTH
!LEGEND CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS % CORE
BOX OR I REMARKS
(Description) RECOV.
SAMPLE (Drilling time, water loss, depth of
ERY
NO weathering, etc., if significant)
,
a b
c d e
f 9
0-33; Fine grained sand(M)and
Samples: WP-06-01-A 0-3.3', WP- 06 -01-
::::::' mud /finer grained layers (5GY6/1).
B 3.3-8.9'
SC (150: 0.16mm,'YAlissing #200:
10.2
3.3-8.9': 5YR3/2 fine grained mind.
Stained with either organics or iron.
SP d50:0.22min,%P,,tssitig#200:1.9
-5
-10—
-15—
. .......
-20
ENG FORM 1836 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE
PROJECT
HOLE NO.
MAR 71 (TRANSLUCENT)
Core WP -06 -02
Core top elevation approximately -4.9' NGVD'29
0 -2.6': 1-mc graine sand, slightly Samples: bVP- 06 -02 -A 0-2.6', WP- 06 -02-
-:: muddy. Mottled (NS) & (5GY'6 /1). B 2.6 -8.8'
SP d50: 0.14mm, %Passing #200: 7..8
2.6 -8.8': Fine gained sand, organics
. ' . ' . ' Present (2.6- 3.4'). Grades From above
Unit between 2.6 -3.4'. Color
10)'R4 /2 & 51'R2/1 (5,2 -7.5) SP
d50: 0.20mm, "/ Passing 14200: 1.6
-5
1
I
t
1 -10
-15
-20
ENG FORM 1836 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE PROJECT HOLE NO.
MAR 71 (TRANSLUCENT)
Hole No. WP-06 -02
DIVISION
DRILLING LoGI South Atlantic
Y INSTALLATION
1 OF 1 SHEETS
+
' 1 PROJECT
-SHEET
10 SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3" Vtbracore
gg i Pass, October 2006
U - - --
i11. DATM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN (7BM or MSL)
-Wiggins
LOCAON (Coordinates or Sfatlon)
2 TI
N/A
385462.5413, 711993.99N, NAD83
112. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
. 3. DRILLING AGENCY
1 Athena Technologies � T tbracore System
Athena Technologies
g
-
13 TOTAL NO. OF OVERBURDEN (DISTURBED (UNDISTURBED
4. HOLE NO.(As shown on drawing title NW-06-02 I SAMPLES TAKEN 0 0
and title number)
-_. -_ 114. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES 3
5. NAME OF DRILLER Sexton
115. ELEVATION GROUNDWATER Tidal
6. DIRECTION OF HOLE
- _..__...._.j------ -- - -- STARTED (COMPLETED
116. DATE HOLE 31 OCT 06 ' 31 OCT 06
r,
r1 X� VERTICAL - 1 INCLINED
- _ - .. _,
__KNE_
DEG. FROM VERT ; - -- " " - -- —L -'—
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE 6.3' Water Depth
7 THIC_ E SS OF OVERBURDEN N /A
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING $,$'
8. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK
O 19. SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR
9 TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE
10.5' I
ELEVATION ' DEPTH
i LEGEND CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS ` %CORE
BOX OR T� REMARKS
-
!
(Description) - RECOV-
! SAMPLE ' (Drilling time, water loss, depth of
ERY
NO. weathering, etc., ilsignificant)
a b
i c
d e
f g
0 -2.6': 1-mc graine sand, slightly Samples: bVP- 06 -02 -A 0-2.6', WP- 06 -02-
-:: muddy. Mottled (NS) & (5GY'6 /1). B 2.6 -8.8'
SP d50: 0.14mm, %Passing #200: 7..8
2.6 -8.8': Fine gained sand, organics
. ' . ' . ' Present (2.6- 3.4'). Grades From above
Unit between 2.6 -3.4'. Color
10)'R4 /2 & 51'R2/1 (5,2 -7.5) SP
d50: 0.20mm, "/ Passing 14200: 1.6
-5
1
I
t
1 -10
-15
-20
ENG FORM 1836 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE PROJECT HOLE NO.
MAR 71 (TRANSLUCENT)
Core WP -06 -03
Core top elevation approximately -6.9' NGVD'29
Hole No. 'VW-06-03
DRILLING LID IVIS�ON
South Atlantic
INSTALLATION SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3" VibraCore--
Wiggins Pass, October 2006
----------
11. DATUM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN (TSM or MSL)
2. LOCATION (Coordinates or Station)
N/A
385158.25E, 711937.75N, NAD8312.
MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
Athena Technologies Vibracorc System
3. DRILLING AGENCY
Athena Technologies
113. TOTAL NO. OF OVE RBURDEN DISTURBED UNDISTURBED
1 SAMPLES TAKEN 0
4. HOLE NO.(As shown on drawingtillO WP -06 -03
and title number)
i. 5. NAME—OF DRILLER Sexton
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES 2
— '-
15. ELEVATION GROUNDWATER Tidal
6. DIRECTION OF HOLE
-- _- __ -___ -C wLETED
16. DATE HOLE 31 OCT 06 31 OCT 06'
X VERTICAL 11 INCLINED DEG. FROM VERT
— 1
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE 8.3' Water Depth
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING--8.8'
------ — ------
8. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK O
19. SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR
9. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 11.5'
ELEVATION
DEPTH
LEGEND CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS %CORE
(Description) RECOV-
BOX OR
SAMPLE
REMARKS
(Drilling time, water loss, depth of
ERY
NO.
weathering, etc., if significant)
a
b
c d e
0-2.1% 5GY6/1 TO 5 Y6/1 mottled
Samples: WP-06-03-A 0-2.1', WP- 06 -03-
sand. Slightly muddy from 1.5-2.1.
B 2.1-6.1',WP-06-03-C 6.1-8.9'
SP d5O; 0.16mm, %Passing #200; 4.2
2.1-6.1': 5Y8/1 to 10YR4/2 clean,
fine grained sand. SP d50:0.20min,
51,1'assing 4200:2.3
-5
----- --- --- –
6.1-8.8'; Mixed sand and shell
L fragments. N6 to 5Y8/1 color. GC
d50: 0.29nim, %Passing #200: 3.5,'Vo
Gravel: 11.4
L
L L-11
-10—
-15–
— ----- -
-20
ENG FORM 1836 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE
PROJECT
HOLE NO.
MAR 71 (TRANSLUCENT)
Core WP -06 -04
Core top elevation approximately -1.1' NGVD'29
DRILLING LOG'l South Atlantic
i1.PROJECT
Wiggins Pass, October 2006
2. LOCATION (Coordinates or Station)
�384972.51E,711856.56N,NAD83___
3. DRILLING AGENCY
Athena Technologies
4. HOLE NO.(As shown an drawing title WP-06-04
and title number)
5 NAME OF DRILLER Sexton
- - -Gilbbi
N
i. DIRE OF HOVE
VERTICAL INCLINED DEG. FROM VEI
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN----- N/A
8. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0
9. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 12 -5
Hole No. WP-06-04
SHEET I OF 1 SHEETS
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3" Vibracore
11. DATUM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN (TBMorMSL)
N/A
12, MANUFACTURER'S 6ESmNAiiori 6F-URiCL
Athena Technologies Vibracore System
V. --l- ---- *'--'
13. TOTAL NO. OF OiERBURDEN DISTURBED !UNDISTURBED
SAMPLES TAKEN i 0 0
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES 2
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER Tidal !
16. DATE HOLE STARTED -TC-04P—LETC6---
31 OCT 06 1 31 OCT 06
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE 2.5' Water Depth
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING
10.7'
------- --- --
19. SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR
ELEVATION j DEPTH i LEGEND CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS %CORE BOX OR
REMARKS
(Description) RECOV- SAMPLE
(Drilling time, water loss, depth of
ERY No.
weathering, etc., it significant)
b c d f
0-4-1': N7 sand with moderate shell
Samples: WP-06-04-A 0-4.1', WP- 06 -04-
content decreasing do encore. SNV
B 4.1-7.0',WP-06-04-C 7.0-10.5'
d50; 0.21 mn), %Passim, tM0:1.2,
Gm cl: 119
4.1-7.0': Mottled 5GY4/1 venfine
-5
sand and N6-N7 sand. SP d50:
0.17mm,'Y.,Pis.,jng 4200:4.1
7.4-10.5': A-lonJed 10YR4/2 to
5Y6/1 fine sand. Borrowed SP d50:
. . . 020min, ° ,Passing ;l 200: 3.1
-10—
-15—
1
-20 1
ENG FORM 1836 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE
PROJECT
HOLE NO.
MAR 71 (TRANSLUCENT)
Core WP -06 -05
Core top elevation approximately -2.6' NGVD'29
Hole No. WP-06-05
DRILLING LOGIDIVIStIN INSTALLATION I SHEET 1 OF i SHEETS
South Atlantir
1. PROJECT —
Wiggins Pass, October 2006
10. SIZE AND TYPE OF 1317 3" Vibracore .........
11. DATUM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN (TBM or MSL)
2. LOCATION (Coordinates or Station)
N/A
385037.21E, 711753.SON NAD83
12. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
Athena Technologies Vibracore System j
- 3. DRILLING AGENCY _
Athena Technologies
_ g —
4. HOLE N0.(As shown on drawing tide
and title number) WP -06 -O5
! 5. NAME OF DRILLER Sexton
---_-._------'---'._.._..---------------'
6. DIRECTION OF HOLE _._
VERTICAL INCLINED DEG. FROM VERT
_.- -
13. TOTAL NO. OVERBURDEN 1 DTURBED UNDISTURBED I
IS
SAMPLES TAKEN 0 ( 0
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES 2
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER Tidal
-- ------ -.— _....------ --- '--... --
'STARTED COMPLETED
16. DATE HOLE 31 OCT- 06 31 OCT 06 .
--- -'-7
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE 4.0' Water Depth
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN N/A
18. TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING 8,3'
i 8. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0
SIGNARE OF INSPECTOR
19. TU
9. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE 10.2'
ELEVATION
a
DEPTH I
b j
LEGS END CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS %CORE
(Description) RECOV- I
ERY
e d e
BOX OR REMARKS
SAMPLE : (Drilling time, water loss, depth of
NO. weathering, etc., ifsignidcant)
f 9
L 0 -2.4': N7 to 5Y8/1 sand and shell
-': I fragments. SSG' d50:11.20tnm,
Samples: WP- 06 -05 -A 0 -2.4, WP- 06 -05-
B 2.4 -8.3'
°/ Passing #200: 1.1, °/ Gravel; 3.9
- -- 2.4 -83: N-lotticd 5GY6 /1 and N6-
. . • . N7 sand. SP d50. 0.20mm, `V6Passing
. ' #200: 1.3
-5
-10
i
i
-20
ENG FORM 1836 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE
PROJECT
HOLE NO.
MAR 71 (TRANSLUCENT)
Core WP -06 -06
Core top elevation approximately -3.9' NGVD'29
Hole No. WP -06 -06
- - - --
- DIVISION
;DRILLING LOG South Atlantic
- - - -- ._ _ -
INSTALLATION i
SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS
1 PROJECT
10 SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3 Vtbracore
Wiggins Pass, October 2006
_ .. _
11 DATUM FOR ELEVATION SHOWN (TBM or MSL) I
2. LOCATION (Coordinates or Station)
N/A I
385165.27E, 711550.57N, NAD83
- -_ _-
112. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL
3. DRILLING AGENCY j
Athena Technologies Vibracore System
Athena Technologies ,
_
13. TOTALNO. OF OVERBURDEN ' I
t DISTURBED UNDISTURBED I
.
4. HOLE NO.(As shown on drawing title WP -06 -06
-
SAMPLES TAKEN 0 1 0
— ' -- -- - ---�
and title number).,
14. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES 2
. 5. NAME OF DRILLER
Sexton
..__ —.._._ _ . .__
15. ELEVATION GROUND WATER Tidal
1
6. DIRECT�ION, OF HOLE --- -- __ - - - -� - - - -- —_ _ � --
_
16. DATE HOLE --- -- T--- '6TARTE,0 - COMPLETED -- -- ��
31 OCT 06 ! 31 OCT 06
u VERTICAL J INCLINED DEG. FROM VERT
- _
---
17. ELEVATION TOP OF HOLE 5.3' Water Depth
7. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN — _ _ _ _ — _
1g, TOTAL CORE RECOVERY FOR BORING
_ 8 DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK O I19.
SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR
9. TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLE
ELEVATION
i DEPTH
LEGEND ! CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS i % CORE
i BOX OR
REMARKS
(Description) RECOV-
SAMPLE
I (Drilling time, water loss, depth of
i
ERY
l
i NO.
weathering, etc., if significant)
a
I b
c d e
f
g
0 -2.9': 5Y8 /1 fine sand, clean. SP
Samples: WP- 06 -06 -A 0 -2.9', WP- 06 -06-
d50: 0.19mm, %Passing 1#2000 1.7
B 2.9- 7.7',WP- 06 -06 -C 7.7 -9.1'
2.9 -7.7': 5YR3/2 grading to
IOYR6 /2 fine grained sand.
" Burrowed. SP d50: 0.20mni,
"/Passing #200:2.4
-5
-.
7.', -9.1': N7 sand with shell
fragments. SW d50: 0.44hnm,
%Passing 4200: 4.2, %Gravel: 11.7
-10
-20
ENG FORM 1836 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE
PROJECT
HOLE NO.
MAR 71 (TRANSLUCENT)
2009 CPE Vibracores
Legend for Geotechnical Data
(SP), (SM), etc. Refers to the Army Corps of Engineers Unified Soils Classification
System. Class types are defined primarily by grain size, sorting
and percent of material passing the 200 sieve. Classification of
materials on the core logs based on visual field examinations are
identified on the core logs under the Classification of Materials
Description. Classifications based on laboratory sieve analyses are
identified on the core logs in the Legend and under Remarks.
Grain Size Terms
Cobble — retained on the 3.0" sieve
Gravel — greater than the #4 sieve and less than the 3.0" sieve
Coarse: greater than the 3/4" sieve and less than the 3.0" sieve
Fine — greater than the #4 sieve and less than the 3/4" sieve
Sand - greater than the #200 sieve and less than the #4 sieve
Coarse - greater than the #10 sieve and less than the #4 sieve
Medium - greater than the #40 sieve and less than the #10 sieve
Fine - greater than the #230 sieve and less than the #40 sieve
Fines — (silt or clay) passing the #230 sieve
Proportional definition of descriptive terms
Descriptive Term
Range of Proportions
Sandy, gravelly, etc.
35 % to 50 %
Some
20 % to 35 %
Little
10 % to 20 %
Trace
1 % to 10 %
Note: Information is after ACOE Atlantic Division Manual # 1110 -1 -1 titled Engineering and Design
Geotechnical Manual for Surface and Subsurface Investigations
CPE
Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc.
2481 N.W. Boca Raton Blvd.
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Phone # 1 -561- 391 -8102
Legend for Geotechnical Data
Well graded grayels or Inorganic sifts and very fine
UVV gravel -sand mixtures. ML sands, rock flour, sandy sifts
little or no fines or clayey sifts with slight plasticity
GP'.:
'
'
Poorly graded gravels
or gravel -sand mixtures,
MIi
Inorganic silts, micaceous or
diatomaceous fine sandy or
no fines
whittle or no fines
Shti ■
silty soil d, elastic silts
GIVI
Peat and other highly
organic soils
SC
Silty gra*els, gravel-
sand -sift mixtures
OL 1 I
I
Organic sifts and organic
sift-clays of low plasticity
GC
Clayey gravels, gravel-
sand -clay mixtures
OH /
Organic clays of medium to high
plasticity, organic silts
e
o e e Well graded sands or gravelly CL Inorganic clays of low to medium
plasticity, '9ravelly clays, sandy
o a o sands, little or no fines clays, sifty clays, lean clays
SP F_- "
Poorly graded sands or
gravelly sands, little or
CH
Inorganic clays of high
plasticity, fat clays
no fines
Shti ■
Silty sands, sand -sift
mixtures
PT
Peat and other highly
organic soils
SC
Clayey sands, sand -clay
mixtu res
SP -SM
Poorly- graded silty sand
0
SVV -SM o
Well- graded silty sand
SIVI-SC
silty clayey sand
(WV -GM p Well- graded silty gravel ML -CL Inorganic silty lean clay
GM -GC Clayey silty gravel
Note: Information is after ACOE Atlantic Division Manual # 1110 -1 -1 titled Engineering and Design
Geotechnical Manual for Surface and Subsurface Investigations
The naming convention used by Coastal Planning and Engineering incorporates key
information about the item in the title. The naming format uses the following
information:
• Abbreviated area narne (two letters that will be used throughout the project)
Abbreviated data type: jet probe (JP), vibracore (VC) or surface sample (SS)
• Collection year (YY)
* Identification number
,
�C[it.�.�,�
t" or cttl`L -£lo" � �,. >tC�� =::I�..��?s'is in Flic case a_�a Jet s:,�; �; -3..
""C'Veloped Its , aa;tf t.. ,. u-a Cli co npa,011c
ai �t'.i "la3
Format examples:
A) WPVC -09 -03
B) WPVC -1 1 -0fi
Example A is vibracore number 03, collected in the Wiggins Pass area of Collier County
in the year 2009.
Example B refers to sample number 1 taken from vibracore number 06, which was
collected in the Wiggins Pass area of Collier County in 2011.
Note: Information is after ACOE Atlantic Division Manual # 1110 -1 -1 titled Engineering and Design
Geotechnieal Manual for Surface and Subsurface Investigations
Rnrina Desinnatinn wp\ /(' -nq_oi
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION - - -
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass 2009 Vibracores
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -09 -01 X = 385,297 Y = 712,138
Mechanical Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena
12. TOTAL SAMPLES t
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Neal Wicker
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
5. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM BEARING
® VERTICAL iVERTICAL
:STARTED COMPLETED
Q INCLINED i
15. DATE BORING
08 -12 -09 09:06 08 -12 -09 09:07
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -6,4 Ft,
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft,
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 8 Ft,
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 9.0 Ft.
PB
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
C
w
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
%
REC.
CW
Od
C�
REMARKS
-6.4
0.(]
J
0%
Shel H lW
Flash caated from visual estimate of shag <4.75mm and >2.8mm
-7.0
0.6
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, shell
1
Sample 91, L)ep =
Mean (mm): 0.21, Phi Sorting: 1.36
III
fragments typically up to 0.5 ", 2 (1.25 "x0.75 ")
Shell Hash: 1%, Fines (230):3.00% (SW)
III
shell fragments @ core top, 1.0" dark gray
-8.9
2.5
III
(2.5Y -4/1) pocket of increased fines and little
organics 0.4' graV (2.5Y-6/1), (SW).
Sample #2, Depth = 3.0'
-9.7
3.3
OLanae i CLAY, little sand, sand is distributed in
I nd pockets up to 1.0 ", material mottles
2
Mean (mm): 0. 18, Phi Sorting: 0.51
Shell Hash: 0%, 1 Fines Sorting: : 0.51 (SP)
ght brownish gray (2.5Y -6/2) sand
Sample # 3, Depth = 4.0'
in transition @ base of layer, black
3
Mean (mm): 0.19, Phi Sorting: 0.49
2.5Y -2.5/1 OL .
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230): 4.13% (SP)
fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
, organics distributed in laminae and
-12.2
5.8
ts up to 0.75 ", light brownish gray
Sample #4, Depth = 7.0'
10YR -6/2 SP .
4
Mean (mm): 0.22, Phi Sorting: 0.44
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some organics,
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230):1.60% (SP)
-14.4
8.0
trace silt, 3.5" brown (10YR -4/3) pocket of
decreased organics @ 4.4', (0.25 "x1.5 ") pocket
-15.4
9.0
of clean sand @ 4.2', very dark grayish brown
10YR -3/2 (SP).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
trace silt, trace organic clayey laminae, light
olive brown 2.5Y -5/4 (SP).
No Recovery.
End of Boring
AJ rUKM 7630 MUU11-ItU 1-UK 1 Fit F LUKIUA UEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
15
•20
VV
Rnrinn liacinnnfinn V\ /PV('._(1Q -n,?
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
GF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass 2009 Vibracores
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -09 -02 X = 384,818 Y = 711,731
Mechanical Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena
12. TOTAL SAMPLES ,
'
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Neal Wicker
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
S. DIRECTION OF BORING ; DEG. FROM BEARING
® VERTICAL VERTICAL i
i3TARTED iCOMPLETED
i t
Q INCLINED ' 1
15. DATE BORING ' 08 -12 -09 09:39 08 -12 -09 09:40
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -3.1 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 10 Ft.
18.
SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 11.0 Ft.
PB
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
n
W
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
%
REC.
-W
Col
CZ
REMARKS
-3.1
0.0
'77
A
m2
Shell Hash caludated f o visual astnWe of shell <4.75mm and >2.8-
-3.7
0.6
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
1
Sample #1, L)ep =
Mean (mm): 0.22, Phi Sorting: 1.02
-4.5
1.4
shell, shell fragments and whole shells typically
up to 0.75 ", 2 (1.0 ") whole shells @ core top,
2
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230):1.54% (SW)
Sample #2, Depth = 1.0'
(1.0 "x2.0 ") rock fragment @ 0.2', 1.0" clayey
Mean (mm): 1.32, Phi Sorting: 2.84
pocket @ 0.1', shell hash increases with depth,
3
Shell Hash: 6 %, Fines (230):1.08% (SW)
-6.6
3.5
"
light gray (2.5Y-7/1). W).
Sample #3, Depth = 2.2'
Mean (mm): 0.23, Phi Sorting: 1.35
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
little shell fragments, little whole shell, trace silt,
Shell Hash: 1 %, Fines (230): 1.42% (SW)
whole shells up to 1.5 ", shell fragments up to
4
Sample #4, Depth = 4.5'
1.0" li ht a,-,/*:, rV-7/1 N iQXfV .
Mean (mm): 0.20, Phi Sorting: 0.64
9.1
6.0
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230):4.26% (SP -SM)
Sample #5, Depth = 6.5'
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
trace shell fragments, trace shell hash, trace
-10.0
6.9
silt, trace whole shell, whole shells and shell
fragments typically up to 1.0 ", organics
5
Mean (mm): 0.19, Phi Sorting: 0.58
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230): 3.86% (SP)
distributed in pockets up to 0.5 ", 3 (2.0 "x1.5 ")
shell fragments @ 2.8' and (1) @ 3.5', 3.0"
Sample #6, Depth = 8.3'
pocket of mottled very dark gray (2.5Y -3/1)
6
Mean (mm): 0.19, Phi Sorting: 0.51
organics and gray (2.5Y -5/1) clay @ 3.0',
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230): 3.12% (SP)
-12.6
9.5
pocket of increased organics from 1.7' to 2.0',
light gray (2.5Y-7/1), (SW).
-13.1
10.0
5
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little organics, trace
-14.1
11.0
clay, little organic laminae throughout, 2.5"
pocket of wood fragments @ 53, color is
mottled with gray (2.5Y -6/1) and, dark gray
2.5Y -4/1 SP -SM .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little organics, trace
clay, clay is distributed in laminae and pockets
up to 0.5" dark olive brown 2.5Y -3/3 (SP).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace
organics, trace organic pockets up to 0.5 ", clay
distributed in laminae and pockets up to 0.75 ",
licint olive brown 2.5Y -5/3 (SP).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little organics, trace
clay, clay distributed in laminae and pockets up
to 0.25" dark olive brown 2.5Y -3/3 (SP).
No Recovery,
End of Boring
JA.! rumw is m MUUlrltU t-UK 1 tit rLUK1UA UCP
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
15
20
25
Rnrinn nimeinnn +inn 1AlDxlr nn n4
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
v01 VV'VV -VJ
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass 2009 Vibracores
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -09 -03 X = 384,548 Y = 711,832
Mechanical Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY ' CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
t
t
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena
'
12. TOTAL SAMPLES ,
t t
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Neal Wicker
S. DIRECTION OF BORING t DEG. FROM t BEARING
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
® VERTICAL VERTICAL i
Q INCLINED '
'STARTED 'COMPLETED
16. DATE BORING ' '
'
: 08 -12 -09 10:10 08 -12 -09 10:11
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -2.9 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 8.9 Ft.
8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 10.0 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
PB
ELEV.
(1t)
DEPTH
(H)
Z
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
%
N J
O6
W
Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
C6
REMARKS
-2.9
0.0
A
my
Shel Flash WcJated from visual estprete °f shell <4.75m and >2.8mm
• hey SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace sit,
Sample #1, Depth = 0.9'
=
shell component is shell hash, shell fragments
",
1
Mean (mm): 1.30, Phi Sorting: 2.23
-4.5
1.6
° ..
and whole shells up to 1.5 1.0" reduced shell
pocket 0.4' light 2.5Y
Shell Hash: 9 %, Fines (230): 1.09% (SW)
Sample #2, Depth = 2.1'
ra -7/1 GW .
-5.4
2.5
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, trace
whole shell, shell fragments and whole shells
2
Mean (mm): 0.26, Phi Sorting: 1.48
Shell Hash: 2 %, Fines (230): 2.45% (SW)
typically up to 1.0 ", (2.0 "x1.5 ") she fragment @
2.0', 2.0" shelly pocket @ base
Sample #3, Depth = 4.3'
component is shell hash, shell fragments and
",
3
Mean (mm): 0.31, Phi Sorting: 1.08
whole shells up to 1.25 light gray (5Y -7/1),
Shell Hash: 1 %, Fines (230):1.41 % (SW)
(SW).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
-9.7
6.8
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, trace
whole shell, whole shells and shell fragments
up to 1.25 ", trace organic day pockets up to
1.25 ", 1.0" wood fragment @ 6.2', 2.0" pocket
Sample #4, Depth = 7.1'
Mean (mm): 1.01, Phi Sorting: 2.68
Shell Hash: 5 %, Fines (230):2.99% (SW)
-10.2
7.3
.;
4
-11.8
8.9
of increased whole shells and shell fragments
5
Sample #5, Depth = 8.5'
Mean (mm): 0.20, Phi Sorting: 0.57
6.3' light gray 2.5Y -7/1 (SW).
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230):4.53% (SP -SC)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell, trace
12.9
10.0
silt, shell component is shell hash, shell
fragments up to 1.25 ", and whole shells up to
0.75 ", (1.5 "x1.0 ") rock fragment @ 6.9',
(1.0 "x0.75 ") rock fragment @ 7.2', gray
2.5Y -5/1 ), (GW -GM).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little organics, trace
clay, organics distributed in pockets up to 0.5 ",
increased organic clays between 7.8' and 8.4',
color is mottled with grayish brown (2.5Y -5/2)
and dark cirwAsh brown 2.5Y -4/2 (SP-SC).
No Recovery,
t
i
End of Boring
CA 1 CAIDea
40NC
..�r�.r.r
-..
- NV It/1VY1vir-u rVl[ 1 HE rLUMIUA UCt'
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
15
20
Rnrinn %A /D\ff` fin nA
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
S. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass 2009 Vibracores
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM :HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -09 -04 i X = 384,269 Y = 711,617
Mechanical Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
- DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
I
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Neal Wicker
14. ELEVATION GROUNDWATER
5. DIRECTION OF BORING ; DEG. FROM BEARING
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
:STARTED COMPLETED
Q INCLINED i
17.
18. DATE BORING
08 -12 -09 10:30 08 -12 -09 10:31
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -5.0 Ft.
DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 10 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 11.0 Ft.
KD
ELEV.
DEPTH
=
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
%
OA
(ft)
(ft)
W
Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
XIL
OQ
REMARKS
-5.0
0.0
A
my
SheN Hash calculated from visual estimate of sher <4.75mm and >2.8mm.
• o
SHELL HASH, little shell fragments, little whole
sample 41, Depth =
-6.0
1.0
. shell, trace sand, trace silt, shell fragments and
whole shells up to 1.75 ", light gray (5Y -7/1),
1
Mean (mm): 2.04, Phi Sorting: 2.04
Shell Hash: 11 %, Fines (230): 0.84% (SW)
-6.7
1.7
2
GW
Sample #2, Depth = 1.3'
Mean (mm): 0.44, Phi Sorting: 1.95
.
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
3
7.8
2.8
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
shell, shell fragments and whole shells up to
Shell Hash: 4 %, Fines (230):1.56% (SW)
Sample #3, Depth = 2.2'
3.7
III
-8.7
1.5 ", (1.5 "x1.75 ") rock fragment @ 1.6', gray
5Y-6/1 (SW).
Mean (mm): 0.52, Phi Sorting: 2.09
Shell Hash: 5 %, Fines (230):1.29% (SW)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
4
Sample #4, Depth = 4.5'
-10.3
5.3
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, trace
while shell, shell fragments up to 1.75 ", whole
Mean (mm): 0. 15, Phi Sorting: 0.67
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230):14.02% (SC)
shells u to 1.25" light gray 5Y -7/1 SW .
Organic CLAY, some sand, little shell hash, firm
Sample #5, Depth = 6.8'
clay, black 5Y -2.5/1 OL .
5
Mean (mm): 0. 15, Phi Sorting: 0.88
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230):6.65% (SW -SM)
Clayey SAND, fine grained, quartz, little silt,
-13.2
8.2
trace organics, trace shell hash, dark gray
5Y-4/1 (SC).
-14.1
9.1
4
Sample #6, Depth = 9.6'
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace
organics, trace shell hash, trace silt, Gay
-15.0
10.0
distributed in laminae and pockets up to
(2.0 "x1.0 "), (2.0 "x1.0 ") shell fragment @ 6.4',
6
Shell Hash) 200, Fines Sorting: .12 (SW)
-16.0
11.0
1.25" whole shell @ 7.1', (2.5 "x0.5 ") worm tube
7.5' gray 5Y -5/1 SW -SM .
Clayey SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace
organics, trace shell fragments, trace shell
hash, shell fragments up to 1.0 ", (1.0 "0.75 ")
worm tube R 9.0' dark gray (5Y-4/1), (SC).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
trace shell fragments, trace shell hash, trace
silt, shell fragments up to 0.75 ", (2.0 "x0.5 ")
worm tube 9.9' gray 5Y -5/1 (SW).
No Recovery,
End of Boring
_ _ -_
vry rvr%m IDJV Irlvulrlr-u rum I HE rLVK!uADEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
15
`TA
25
Rnrinn npczinnnfinn V\ /P \ /r- (1Q -nl;
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
--- --- -- - -- - -- --- -- -- --
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
of 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT Iddalkh,
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass 2009 Vibracores
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM :HORIZONTAL i VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East : NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -09-05 X = 383,865 Y = 711,530
Mechanical Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY t CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
i
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Neal Wicker
14, ELEVATION GROUND WATER
S. DIRECTION OF BORING t DEG. FROM t BEARING
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
:STARTED COMPLETED
INCLINED
16. DATE BORING
08 -12 -09 11:00 08 -12 -09 11:02
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -2.2 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 9.7 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 10.6 Ft.
KD
ELEV.
DEPTH
o
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
ode
KW
Od
(ft)
(ft)
W
Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
REMARKS
-2.2
0.0
J
mq
Shell Hash calc-lated from tisuel estimate of shell <4.75n and >2.8-
.;
h y AND, fine grained, quartz, i e s el
Sample ep =
-3.2
1.0
fragments, trace silt, trace whole shell, shell
component is shell hash, whole shells up to
1
Mean (mm): 1.21, Phi Sorting: 2.23
Shell Hash: 9 %, Fines (230): 0.89% (SW)
2.0 ", shell fragments up to 1.75 ", 2 (1.25 "x0.5 ")
Sample #2, Depth = 1.8'
coral fragments @ 0.2', (1.75 "x1.5 ") rock
2
Mean (mm): 0.43, Phi Sorting: 1.85
-5.0
2.8
fragment 0.4' light gray (5Y-7/1), GW
Shell Hash: 6 %, Fines (230):1.19% (SW)
.
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
u ' '
shell, shell fragments up to 1.0 ", whole shells
Sample #3, Depth = 4.3'
a.
typically up to 1.25 ", (2.0 "x1.75 ") whole shell @
3
Mean (mm): 1.18, Phi Sorting: 2.49
1.1' light gray (5Y-7/1). SW .
Shell Hash: 9 %, Fines (230):1.42% (SW)
a:
SHELL HASH, little shell fragments, trace sand,
-8.4
6.2
trace silt, trace whole shell, shell fragments up
to 1.75 ", whole shells up to 1.5 ", (2.5 "x0.5 ")
organic pocket @ 4.6', (2.0 "x3.0 ") sand layer @
4.7', 1.0" rock fragment @ 6.1', light gray
Sample #4, Depth = 6.4'
Mean (mm): 0.43, Phi Sorting: 1.62
Shell Hash: 4 %, Fines (230):4.66% (SW -SM)
Sample #5, Depth = 6.9'
-8.9
6.7
4
5
5Y -7/1 ), (GW .
6
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 0.54
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
trace organic day, trace silt, 1.5" organic day
Pocket 6.6' dark gray (5Y-4/1). SW -SM .
-10.8
8.6
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230):10.09% (SP -SM)
Sample #6, Depth = 7.6'
Mean (mm): 0.17, Phi Sorting: 0.49
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230):4.93% (SP -SM)
-11.4
9.2
7
-11.9
9.7
8
Organic SAND, fine grained, quartz, little silt,
-12.8
10.6
trace clay, trace shell hash, black (5Y- 2.5/1),
SP -SM .
Sample #7, Depth = 8.9'
Mean (mm): 0.26, Phi Sorting: 1.52
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell hash,
Shell Hash: 3 %, Fines (230):6.90% (SW -SM)
trace silt, trace day pockets up to 0.5 ", dark
Sample #8, Depth = 9.5'
gray 5Y-4/1 SP -SM .
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 0.40
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230): 2.53% (SP)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
trace shell fragments, trace silt, shell fragments
up to 0.75 ", trace clay pockets up to 1.0 ", light
gray 5Y -7/2 SW -SM .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, trace silty
pockets up to 0.25" light gray (5Y-7/2), (SP).
No Recoverv.
End of Boring
aru rvl%m 1000 IvlvulrlCU rum 111t rLVK1UAUEv
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
i6'1
20
25
Rnrinrl nPSinnatinn WPVr_0Cl_f1F
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass 2009 Vibracores
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL a AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -09 -06 X = 383,476 Y = 711,498
Mechanical Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
i
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
1
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Neal Wicker
14. ELEVATION GROUNDWATER
S. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM i BEARING
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
isTARTED COMPLETED
Q INCLINED
'
15. DATE BORING
. 08 -12 -09 11:24 08 -12 -09 11:26
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -4.7 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
18.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 9.3 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 10.0 Ft.
KD
ELEV.
DEPTH
Z
w
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
%
WJ
Os.
(n)
(ft)
Depths Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
X2
REMARKS
-4.7
0.0
W
Shall Hash cakilated from visual est note of shall <4.75mm and >2.8m
AND, ine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
Sample al, Uepth =
-5.7
1.0
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
shell, whole shells up to 1.0 ", shell fragments
r
1
Mean (mm): 0.28, Phi Sorting: 1.17
Shell Hash: 2 %, Fines (230): 1.41 % (SW)
up to 0.75" light gray (5Y-7/1), (SW).
Sample #2, Depth = 1.9'
u •�
SHELL HASH, little shell fragments, trace sand,
2
Mean (mm): 2.07, Phi Sorting: 1.96
-7.5
2.8
trace silt, trace whole shell, shell fragments
typically up to 1.0 ", whole shells up to 1.5 ",
(3.0 ")2.0 ") shell fragment @ 1.1', 1.25" rock
Shell Hash: 12 %, Fines (230): 0.77% (SW)
Sample #3, Depth = 3.2'
Mean (mm): 0.15, Phi Sorting: 0.95
-8.2
3.5
3
fragment @ 1.6', (2.0 "x1.5 ") shell fragments @
4
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230): 2.70% (SW)
-9.6
4.9
2.0' and 2.2' gray 5Y -6/1 GW .
Sample #4, Depth = 4.1'
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 0.65
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
III
trace shell fragments, trace shell hash, trace
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230): 5.19% (SP -SM)
-11.0
6.3
III
silt, shell fragments typically up to 0.75 ",
(1.5 "x1.25 ") shell fragments @ 2.9' and 3.2',
-11.7
7.0
4
gray 5Y -6/1 (SW).
Sample #5, Depth = 7.8'
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organic clay,
trace shell hash, trace silt, 2.0" organic day
5
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 0.49
g.p
@ 3.6', (1.0 "x1.5 ") organic clay pocket
4.4' very dark gray (5y-3/1), SP -SM .
Shell Hash: 0 %, Fines (230): 3.01% (SP)
13.7
pocket
4
Organic CLAY, trace shell hash, trace sand
-14.7
10.0
pockets up to 1.0" black 5Y -2.5/1 ), (OL
.
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organic clay,
trace silt very dark gray (5Y-3/1). SP -SM .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
trace silt dark gray (5Y-4/1), (SP).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organic day,
trace silt gray 5Y -6/1 SP -SM .
CLAY, trace shell hash, day partially lithified,
rock refusal a 10.0' gray 5Y -6/1 (CL).
No Recovery,
End of Boring
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
-0
Its]
15
20
25
2011 CPE Vibracores
Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc.
2481 N.W. Boca Raton Blvd.
ift Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Phone # 1 -561- 391 -8102
(SP), (SM), etc. Refers to the Army Corps of Engineers Unified Soils Classification
System. Class types are defined primarily by grain size, sorting
and percent of material passing the 200 sieve. Classification of
materials on the core logs based on visual field examinations are
identified on the core logs under the Classification of Materials
Description. Classifications based on laboratory sieve analyses are
identified on the core logs in the Legend and under Remarks.
Grain Size Terms
Cobble — retained on the 3.0" sieve
Gravel — greater than the #4 sieve and less than the 3.0" sieve
Coarse: greater than the 3/4" sieve and less than the 3.0" sieve
Fine — greater than the #4 sieve and less than the 3/4" sieve
Sand - greater than the #200 sieve and less than the #4 sieve
Coarse - greater than the #10 sieve and less than the #4 sieve
Medium - greater than the #40 sieve and less than the #10 sieve
Fine - greater than the #230 sieve and less than the #40 sieve
Fines — (silt or clay) passing the #230 sieve
Proportional definition of descriptive terms
Descriptive Term Range of Proportions
Sandy, gravelly, etc. 35 % to 50 %
Some 20 % to 35 %
Little 10 % to 20 %
Trace
1 %to 10%
Note: Information is after ACOE Atlantic Division Manual # 1110 -1 -1 titled Engineering and Design
Geotechnical Manual for Surface and Subsurface Investigations
" � CPE t,
Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc.
2481 N.W. Boca Raton Blvd.
Boca Raton, Florida 33431
Phone # 1 -561- 391 -8102
e2end for Geotechnical Data
Wall graded grayels or � Inorganic sifts and very fine
GN gravel -sand mixtures, ML sands, rock flour, sandy silts
little or no fines or clayey silts with slight plasticity
Poorly graded gravels
GP or gravel -sand mixtures,
wl little or no fines
GM Silty gravels, gravel -
sand -sift mixtures
GC Clayey gravels, gravel-
sand -clay mixtures
1�jWell graded sands or gravelly
sands, little or no fines
MH MInorganic silts, micaceous or
diatomaceous fine sandy or
silty soil d, elastic silts
OL 1 I Organic sifts and organic
sift -clays of low plasticity
OH r Organic clays of medium to high
1 plasticity, organic silts
CL Inorganic clays of low to medium
plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy
clays, silty clays, lean clays
SP _
Poorly graded sands or
gravelly sands, little or
CH
Inorganic clays of high
plasticity, fat clays
no fines
.'
Silty sands, sand -sift
mixtures
PT
Peat and other highly
organic soils
SC
Clayey sands, sand -clay
mixtures
SP -SM
Poorly- graded silty sand
°
SVfV -SM °
Well- graded silty sand
SM -sC
Silty clayey sand
MH GvV -GM Well- graded silty gravel ML -CL M Inorganic silty lean clay
GM -GC IM Clayey silty gravel
Note: Information is after ACOE Atlantic Division Manual # 1110 -1 -1 titled Engineering and Design
Geotechnical Manual for Surface and Subsurface Investigations
Legend for Geotechnical Data
The naming convention used by Coastal Planning and Engineering incorporates key
information about the item in the title. The naming format uses the following
information:
* Abbreviated area name (two letters that will be used throughout the project)
• Abbreviated data type: jet probe (JP), vibracore (VC) or surface sarnple (SS)
*
Collection vear (YY)
* Identification number
o r L. I tp ?i,s,.l. .� �, �: "i ii? vi2�:' i, >`s td %fit ��
?.
are 7i . fl "i
< ill
uc, i to c "'hZir aci" i_ e _,. ,J. l colli ail "C
�i "1<61� 1 ":iii
Format examples:
A) WPVC. -09 -03
B) WPVC -11 -06 S .'
Example A is vibracore number 03, collected in the Wiggins Pass area of Collier County
in the year 2009.
Example B refers to sample number 1 taken from vibracore number 06, which was
collected in the Wiggins Pass area of Collier County in 2011.
Note: Information is after ACOE Atlantic Division Manual # 1110 -1 -1 titled Engineering and Design
Geotechnical Manual for Surface and Subsurface Investigations
Borina Designation WPVC -11 -01
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -01 X = 384,207 Y = 711,485
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY ' CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED ' UNDISTURBED (UD)
i
Athena Technologies, Inc. t
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
;
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
S. DIRECTION OF BORING DEG. FROM BEARING
:STARTED COMPLETED
® VERTICAL VERTICAL i
INCLINED i
18. DATE BORING ' 08_17 -11 14:04 08 -17 -11 14:06
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -3,3 Ft,
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 17.8 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20.0 Ft.
KD /BF
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
w
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
%
REC.
OW
-on
REMARKS
-3.3
0.0
J
Q
mw
Shell Hash calulated from visual estimate of shell <4.75mm and >2.8m
_
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
1
am e e =
Mean (mm): 0.34, Phi Sorting: 1.59
shell, whole shells up to (2 "x1.5 "), shell frags.
Fines (230): 0.85% (SW)
up to (1 "x0.5 "), (0.75 "x0.25 ") coral frag. @ 0.3',
2
Sample #2, Depth = 1.5'
-5.7
2.4
gray (2.5Y-6/1), (SW).
Mean (mm): 0.17, Phi Sorting: 0.69
Fines (230):1.34% (SP)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, shell
frags. up to 0.75 ", (1 "x0.75 ") whole shell @ 23,
Sample #3, Depth = 4.5'
light gray (2.5Y -7/1 SP .
3
Mean (mm): 0.35, Phi Sorting: 1.61
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
Fines (230): 1.00% (SW)
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
-9.2
5.9
shell, trace wood, whole shells up to 1.5 ", shell
frags. up to (2 "x1 "), (1.25 "x1 ") rock frag. @ 2.6',
Sample #4, Depth = 6.5'
-10.2
6.9
(1 "x0.5 ") rock frag. @ 3', wood frags. up to 0.5"
@ 4.5', shell hash increases with depth, gray
4
Mean (mm): 0.25, Phi Sorting: 1.89
Fines (230):17.18% (SC)
2.5Y -6/1 SW .
Sample #5, Depth = 7.5'
-11.7
8,4
5
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.96
Fines (230):13.77% (SC)
SAND, fine grained, quartz little clay, trace
shell fragments, trace shell hash, trace whole
-12.5
9.2
shell, shell frags. and whole shells typically up
to 0.75", (2.5 ")2 ") whole shell and (3 ")2 ") shell
-13.6
10.3
fra . 6.1' black 2.5Y -2.5/1 (SC)..
SAND, little clay, trace shell fragments, trace
shell hash, trace wood, shell and wood frags.
-14.8
11.5
' '
typically up to 0.5 ", (2.5 "x1 ") wood frag. @ 7.9',
black 2.5Y -2.5/1 (SC).
Gravely SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell
hash, trace clay, trace shell fragments, trace
silt, trace whole shell, gravel component is rock
up to 3 ", shell frags. up to 1 ", whole shells up to
-17.8
14.5
0.5" light brownish ra 2.5Y -6/2 GW .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace
shell fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt,
trace whole shell, clay distrib. in clayey pockets
-19.6
16.3
up to (2 "x0.75 "), whole shells up to 0.75 ", shell
frags. u to 0.5" light ra 2.5Y -7/2 SW .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace day, trace
-21.1
17.8
shell fragments, trace shell hash, clay distrib. in
clayey pockets up to 0.25 ", shell frags. up to
0.75" light gray 2.5Y -7/1 (SP).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, grayish
brown 10YR -5/2 (SP).
-23.3
20.0
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little silt, trace clay,
clay distrib. in pockets up to 0.5 ", dark olive
brown 2.5Y -3/3 SP -SM .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace day, trace silt,
clay and silt distrib. in laminae, light gray
2.5Y -7/2 (SP).
CLAY, little sand, soft day, sand distrib. in
laminae, color is mottled gray (5Y -5/1) and,
olive yellow 2.5Y -6/6 (CL).
No Recovery.
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04 End of Boring
-0
-5
IM
IR,
-20
25
DRILLING LOG DIVISION
1. PROJECT
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
Collier County, FL
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
WPVC -11 -02 X = 383,679 Y = 711,568
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
Athena Technologies Inc.
4. NAME OF DRILLER
Palmer McLellan
5. DIRECTION OF BORING
n DEG. FROM n BEARING
® VERTICAL
VERTICAL
Q INCLINED
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN
0,0 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK
0,0 Ft.
8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING
10.0 Ft.
0
z
boring Uest nation WF'VG -11 -O2
INSTALLATION SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM :HORIZONTAL i VERTICAL
Florida State Plane East : NAD 1983 NAVD 88
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
i DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
12. TOTAL SAMPLES ,
t i
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
iSTARTED COMPLETED
15. DATE BORING ; 08 -16 -11 15:16 08 -16 -11 15:17
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -3.4 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 6 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
BF
ELEV. DEPTH w CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(ft) (ft) W Depths and elevations based on measured values
_'%a nn
component is shell hash, whole shells up to 2.0"
and shell fragments up to 1.5 ", gray (5Y -6/1),
SM .
SAND, fine grained, little shell hash, trace shell
fragments, trace silt, shell fragments up to 0.5 ",
Iw_a /l I IC1An
Shelly SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace rock
fragments, trace silt, shell component is shell
hash, shell fragments and whole shells up to
2.0 ", rock fragments typically up to 1.5 ",
(3.0"x2.0") rock fragment @ 1.5', gray
2.5Y -6/1 (SW).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace silt,
trace whole shell, trace wood, whole shells up to
0.5 ", clay distributed in pockets up to 0.25 ",
wood fragments typically up to 0.5 ", 1.5" clayey
pocket @ 2.8', 1.0" wood fragment @ 3.0',
ra 'sh brown 2.5Y -5/2 SP .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little clay, trace silt,
black 5Y -2.5/1 (SC).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little clay, little silt,
trace shell hash, 2.0" shelly pockets @ 3.8' and
4.4', shell component is shell hash and shell
fragments up to 2.0" black 5Y -2.511 (SC).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace silt,
color is mottled dark gray (5Y -4/1) and, black
5Y -2.5/1 (SP-SC).
No Recovery,
End of Boring
5AJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
OOA
X11 REMARKS
my Shal Hash calcJaled from Nsu d estimate of shel G1.75" and >2.8m
1 Sample Depth =
2 Mean (mm): 0.60, Phi Sorting: 1.98
Fines (230):12.30% (SM)
3 Sample #2, Depth = 0.6'
Mean (mm): 0.31, Phi Sorting: 1.34
Fines (230): 0.98% (SW)
4 Sample #3, Depth = 1.7'
5 Mean (mm): 2.17, Phi Sorting: 2.20
Fines (230): 0.53% (SW)
6 Sample #4, Depth = 3.0'
Mean (mm): 0.13, Phi Sorting: 0.55
7 Fines (230): 3.01 % (SP)
Sample #5, Depth = 3.4'
Mean (mm): 0. 13, Phi Sorting: 0.62
Fines (230):13.07% (SC)
Sample #6, Depth = 4.2'
Mean (mm): 0.14, Phi Sorting: 0.68
Fines (230):14.42% (SC)
Sample #7, Depth = 5.5'
Mean (mm): 0. 15, Phi Sorting: 0.60
Fines (230): 6.01 % (SP -SC)
-0
Q
1E
Borinq Designation WPVC -11 -03
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
-0
10
15
20
-25
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
DRILLING LOG
of 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT A1111111111111L
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM/DATUM :HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -03 X = 383,808 Y = 711,843
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
t ,
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
5. DIRECTION OF BORING ; DEG. FROM i BEARING
:STARTED COMPLETED
® VERTICAL iVERTICAL
Q INCLINED
1S. DATE BORING
: 08 -17 -11 12:46 08 -17 -11 12:48
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -3.0 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0,0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 12.8 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 16.0 Ft.
KD /LC
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
O
W
a
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
%
REC.
-W
Od
CQ
REMARKS
-3,0
0,0
J
my
Shel Hash c&daled from vimoi estimate of shel W.75mm and >2.8m
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
Sample Depth =
fragments, trace silt, trace whole shell, shell
1
Mean (mm): 0. 15, Phi Sorting: 0.60
4.2
1.2
fragments up to (15"4.5 "), whole shells up to
Fines (230):1.76% (SP)
11 W
1.0 "x0.75" gray 5Y -6/1 SP.
2
Sample #2, Depth = 1.6'
5 2
2 2
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
Mean (mm): 0.40, Phi Sorting: 1.96
Fines (230): 0.94% (SW)
3
-6.4
3.4
shell, shell fragments up to (1.75 "x1.0 "), whole
shells up to (1.75 "x1.25 "), ligjS (2.5Y -7/2),
(SW).
Sample #3, Depth = 2.8'
Mean (mm): 0.62, Phi Sorting: 1.62
Fines (230):1.75% (SW)
4
SAND, fine grained, quartz, hell hash,
Sample #4, Depth = 3.6'
trace silt, trace whole shell, hells up to
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 0.85
(1.0 "x0.5 "), 0.5" wood fr@ 3.4',
Fines (230):14.69% (SM)
(3.0 "x1.0 ") silt pocket @ 2.increases
Sample #5, Depth = 7.0'
with depth, silt decreases pth, light
5
Mean (mm): 0.25, Phi Sorting: 1.96
brownish gray 2.5Y -W .
Fines (230):13.60% (SC)
SAND, little silt, trace day, hell hash,
dark gray 2.5Y -4/.
SAND, little clay, trace shell fragments, trace
shell hash, trace silt, trace whole shell, whole
-12.6
9.6
shells up to (1.25 "x0.5 "), shell fragments up to
1.0 "x1.25" v dark gray 2.5Y -3/1 (St). Ir
-13.4
10.4
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
litt le silt, trace day, trace rock fragments, trace
shell fragments, clay distributed in pockets up to
1.5 ", rock fragments up to (2.5 ")2.0 "), shell
fragments up to 0.5 ", grayish brown (2.5Y -5/2),
-15.8
12.8
GM
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, silt
distributed in pockets up to 1.0" and laminae,
color is mottled light gray (2.5Y -7/1) and,
grayish brown 10YR -5/2 (SP).
No Recovery.
-19.0
16.0
End of Boring
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
-0
10
15
20
-25
DRILILING LOG I DIVISION
1. PROJECT
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
Collier County, FL
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
WPVC -11 -04 X = 383,827 Y = 711,653
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
Athena Technologies, Inc.
4. NAME OF DRILLER
DEPTH
Palmer McLellan
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
S. DIRECTION OF BORING
; DEG. FROM BEARING
® VERTICAL
VERTICAL
Q INCLINED
0.0
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN
0.0 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK
0.0 Ft.
8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING
20.0 Ft.
0
2
trace shell fragments, trace silt, whole shells
boring ueSI nation VVf- VU -11 -U4
INSTALLATION SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM i HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
12. TOTAL SAMPLES ,
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES '
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
STARTED iCOMPLETED
15. DATE BORING ' 08 -17 -11 13:16 08 -17 -11 13:18
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -3,0 Ft,
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16.4 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
BF
ELEV.
DEPTH
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(ft)
(ft)
W
Depths and elevations based on measured values
-3.0
0.0
j
SHELL HASH, little whole shell, trace sand,
trace shell fragments, trace silt, whole shells
W;11]�tIIIIil
M�01
ME X
REl�lT�l1
0
-16.4 F 13.4
Y
J
and shell fragments typically up to 2.0 ,
(3.0 "x1.5 ") and (3.0 ")0.5 ") shell fragments @
shell hash, trace silt, 1.0" clay pocket at top of
layer, 2.5" whole shell @ 2.2', dark gray
SAND, trace day, trace shell hash, trace silt,
I trace wood, wood fragments up to 1.0 ", black
I (5Y- 2.5/2). (SM).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little clay, trace
shell hash, trace whole shell, whole shells up to
0.5 ", 2.0" shelly pocket @ 5.0', shell component
is shell hash and shell fragments up to 2.0 ",
(5.0 "x0.5 ") wood fragment @ 4.6', dive gray
5Y-4/2 (SC).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace day, trace silt,
trace wood, clay distributed in pockets up to
0.75 ", wood fragments up to 0.5 ", color is
mottled grayish brown (2.5Y -5/2) and, black
5Y -2.5/1 (SP-SC).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little silt, trace clay,
trace wood, clay distributed in pockets up to
1.0 ", wood fragments up to 0.25 ", silt decreases
'd with depth, color is mottled light gray (2.5Y -7/2),
a. light olive brown (2.5Y -5/3) and, olive brown
SANU, tine grained, some coral, little rock
fragments, sand is quartz and carbonate, coral
fragments up to 3.0 ", color is mottled pale
yellow (5Y -8/2) and, grayish brown (2.5Y -5/2),
(GW ).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace Gay, trace silt
trace wood, clay distributed in pockets up to
1.0 ", wood fragments up to 0.25 ", color is
mottled light gray (2.5Y -7/2), light olive brown
(2.5Y -5/3) and, olive brown (2.5Y -4/3),
End of Boring
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
O�
O2
my
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
8
REMARKS
She1 Hash cakWated from Nsual estimte of shel <4.75mm and >2.8m
Sample #1, Depth = 0.8'
Mean (mm): 1.87, Phi Sorting: 2.39
Fines (230): 0.66% (SW)
Sample #2, Depth = 2.1'
Mean (mm): 0. 15, Phi Sorting: 0.59
Fines (230):10.24% (SM)
Sample #3, Depth = 2.7'
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 1.08
Fines (230): 50.73%
Sample #4, Depth = 3.2'
Mean (mm): 0.14, Phi Sorting: 0.66
Fines (230): 9.88% (SM)
Sample #5, Depth = 4.3'
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 1.01
Fines (230):14.92% (SC)
Sample #6, Depth = 7.3'
Mean (mm): 0.15, Phi Sorting: 0.57
Fines (230):4.10% (SP -SC)
Sample #7, Depth = 8.7'
Mean (mm): 0.15, Phi Sorting: 0.54
Fines (230):18.63% (SM)
Sample #8, Depth = 11.3'
Mean (mm): 0.22, Phi Sorting: 0.39
Fines (230):5.12% (SP -SM)
0
5
10
15
20
25
Boring Desianation WPVC -11 -05
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT A1111111111111116,
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL i VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL [::] AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -05 X = 383,851 Y = 711,458
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY ' CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
' DISTURBED ' UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
,
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
S. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM BEARING
:STARTED COMPLETED
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
Q INCLINED
1S. DATE BORING
08 -17 -11 07:45 08 -17 -11 07:46
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -4.7 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 10.3 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 12.0 Ft.
BF
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
O
Z
lu
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
MW
0-4 O
G
REMARKS
W
Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
Ca
-4.7
0.0
ma
Shell Flash sn caicdarea r v seals a shell <a.zs >z.amm
SHELL HASH, some sand, little shell
fragments, trace rock fragments, trace silt, trace
whole shell, shell fragments typically up to
", ",
Sample #1, Depth = 3.0'
1.75 whole shells up to 2.0 rock fragments
", "x1.5 ")
1
Mean (mm): 0.74, Phi Sorting: 1.71
typically up to 1.0 (4.0 shell fragment @
"x0.25 ")
Fines (230): 0.94% (SW)
1.0', (1.25 coral fragment @ 3.3',
(2.25 "x1.0 ") coral fragment @ 4.0', (2.0 "x1.25 ")
rock fragment @ 5.1', gray (2.5Y -5/1), (SW).
-11.3
6.6
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, trace
wood, silt distributed in pockets up to 0.5 ", wood
Sample #2, Depth = 7.6'
p
fragments up to 0.25 ", 3.0" shelly pocket @
2
Mean (mm): 0.15, Phi Sorting: 0.37
-13.3
8.6
6.8', shell component is shell hash, shell
fragments and whole shells up to 1.011, grayish
Fines (230): 5.30% (SP -SM)
Sample #3, Depth = 9.0'
-14.1
9.4
brown 2.5Y -5/2 SP -SM .
3
Mean (mm): 0.14, Phi Sorting: 0.31
Fines (230): 3.61 % (SP)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, trace
-15.0
10.3
o
wood, wood fragments up to (0.5 "x0.25 "), light
brownish gray (2.5Y-6/2), SP .
Gravely SAND, fine grained, quartz, little silt,
-16.7
12.0
trace shell hash, gravel component is rock
fragments up to (2.5 "x1.5 "), gray (5Y -5/1),
GW .
No Recovery.
End of Boring
SAJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
-0
-5
10
15
-20
25
to 1.5 ", whole shells up to 2.0 ", gray (2.5Y -5/1),
DIVISION
DRILLING LOG
1. PROJECT
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
Collier County, FL
2. BORING DESIGNATION
LOCATION COORDINATES
WPVC -11 -06
X = 383,866 Y = 711,309
3. DRILLING AGENCY
CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
Athena Technologies, Inc.
4. NAME OF DRILLER
Palmer McLellan
5. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM BEARING
® VERTICAL
VERTICAL
Q INCLINED
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20,0 Ft,
0
ELEV,
DEPTH
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
(ft)
(ft)
W
Depths and elevations based on measured values
-5.2
0.0
j
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace day, trace silt,
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
clay distributed in pockets typically up to 0.25 ",
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
2.0" clayey layer @ 12.2', 2.0" very dark grayish
shell, whole shells up to 1.0 ", shell fragments
13.6
brown (2.5Y -3/2) sand layer @ 13.4', color is
typically up to 1.25 ", shell hash increases with
mottled light gray (2.5Y -7/1), light gray
depth, (2.25 "x1.75 ") shell fragment @ 4.0', gray
14.5
(2.5Y -7/2) and, light brownish gray (2.5Y -6/2),
(5Y -6/1), (SW).
-9.5
4.3
SP.
Clayey SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt,
SHELL HASH, little sand, little shell fragments,
-10.6
5.4
trace silt, trace whole shell, shell fragments up
to 1.5 ", whole shells up to 2.0 ", gray (2.5Y -5/1),
MM111
silt distributed in laminae, day distributed in
laminae and pockets up to 0.5 ", grayish brown
No Recovery.
End of Boring
5AJ FORM 1536 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
boring uesl nation vvF'VG- 'II -U6
INSTALLATION SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL AUTO HAMMER
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
� ,
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES '
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
STARTED COMPLETED
15. DATE BORING ' 08 -17 -11 08:22 08 -17 -11 08:24
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -5.2 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16.6 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
BF
OA.
GQ REMARKS
0 Shd Hash cWcdated from visual estimate W shel <4.75mm and >2.8mm.
Sample #1, Depth = 2.0'
1 Mean (mm): 0.26, Phi Sorting: 0.97
Fines (230):1.09% (SW)
Sample #2, Depth = 4.9'
2 Mean (mm): 1.10, Phi Sorting: 1.82
1 Fines (230): 0.67% (SW)
Sample #3, Depth = 6.8'
3 Mean (mm): 2.81, Phi Sorting: 1.61
Fines (230):1.22% (SW)
0
61
Sample #4, Depth = 10.5'
1C
4 Mean (mm): 0.24, Phi Sorting: 0.40
Fines (230): 2.22% (SP)
Sample #5, Depth = 14.1'
5 Mean (mm): 0.15, Phi Sorting: 0.57
Fines (230): 43.85% (SC)
Sample #6, Depth = 15.6'
6 Mean (mm): 0.20, Phi Sorting: 0.50
Fines (230):8.06% (SP -SM)
1E
�c
e grained, quartz, little shell hash,
l fragments, trace silt, trace whole
l hash increases with depth, whole
Lshells
-13.2
8.0
o 1.0 ", shell fragments up to 1.25 ",
ra 5Y -6/1 SW .
SHELL HASH, little shell fragments, trace rock
fragments, trace sand, trace silt, trace whole
shell, 1.0" day pocket @ 7.0', whole shells up to
1.25 ", shell fragments typically up to 1.0 ",
(2.5 "x1.0 ") shell fragment @ 7.5', rock
fra ments up to 0.5" gray 2.5Y -6/1 (SW).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace day, trace silt,
clay distributed in pockets typically up to 0.25 ",
2.0" clayey layer @ 12.2', 2.0" very dark grayish
-18.8
13.6
brown (2.5Y -3/2) sand layer @ 13.4', color is
mottled light gray (2.5Y -7/1), light gray
-19.7
14.5
(2.5Y -7/2) and, light brownish gray (2.5Y -6/2),
- - --
SP.
Clayey SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt,
MM111
silt distributed in laminae, day distributed in
laminae and pockets up to 0.5 ", grayish brown
No Recovery.
End of Boring
5AJ FORM 1536 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
boring uesl nation vvF'VG- 'II -U6
INSTALLATION SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL AUTO HAMMER
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
� ,
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES '
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
STARTED COMPLETED
15. DATE BORING ' 08 -17 -11 08:22 08 -17 -11 08:24
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -5.2 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16.6 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
BF
OA.
GQ REMARKS
0 Shd Hash cWcdated from visual estimate W shel <4.75mm and >2.8mm.
Sample #1, Depth = 2.0'
1 Mean (mm): 0.26, Phi Sorting: 0.97
Fines (230):1.09% (SW)
Sample #2, Depth = 4.9'
2 Mean (mm): 1.10, Phi Sorting: 1.82
1 Fines (230): 0.67% (SW)
Sample #3, Depth = 6.8'
3 Mean (mm): 2.81, Phi Sorting: 1.61
Fines (230):1.22% (SW)
0
61
Sample #4, Depth = 10.5'
1C
4 Mean (mm): 0.24, Phi Sorting: 0.40
Fines (230): 2.22% (SP)
Sample #5, Depth = 14.1'
5 Mean (mm): 0.15, Phi Sorting: 0.57
Fines (230): 43.85% (SC)
Sample #6, Depth = 15.6'
6 Mean (mm): 0.20, Phi Sorting: 0.50
Fines (230):8.06% (SP -SM)
1E
�c
Borina Desianation WPVC -11 -07
5AJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
15
-20
KI
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
DRILLING LOG
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -07 X = 384,049 Y = 711,670
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY ' CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
' DISTURBED ' UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
I ,
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUNDWATER
S. DIRECTION OF BORING a DEG. FROM BEARING
:STARTED COMPLETED
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
Q INCLINED i
13. DATE BORING
08 -17 -11 10:50 : 08 -17 -11 10:52
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0,0 Ft,
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -5.1 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 9.6 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 12.7 Ft.
BF
ELEV.
( )
DEPTH
(ft)
w
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
%
REC.
C W
Xf
O�
REMARKS
-5.1
0.0
A
my
shell Flash calculated from visual estimate of shell 0.75mm and >2.8mn.
SHELL HASH, little sand, little shell fragments,
trace rock fragments, trace silt, trace whole
shell, rock fragments typically up to 1.0 ", whole
Sample #1, Depth = 1.8'
shells up to 1.5 ", shell fragments typically up to
1
Mean (mm): 1.56, Phi Sorting: 1.90
2.0 ", (2.0 "x1.5 ") rock fragment @ 1.3,
Fines (230):1.20% (SW)
(2.5 "x1.5 ") shell fragment @ 1.0 ", (3.0 "x2.0 ")
-8.6
3.5
shell fragment @ 1.4', (1.75 "x1.5 ") rock
fragment 3.5' gray 2.5Y -6/1 (SW).
Sample #2, Depth = 4.6'
, little Gay, little organics, trace rock
ts, trace shell hash, trace wood, clay
2
Mean (mm): 0.23, Phi Sorting: 1.38
-10.4
5.3
ed in laminae and pockets up to 0.5 ",
gments up to 1.0 ", rock fragments up
Fines (230):13.78% (SC)
o 0.5" black 5Y -2.5/1 SC .
Sample #3, Depth = 6.2'
fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace
3
Mean (mm): 0. 19, Phi Sorting: 0.74
l hash, trace silt, trace wood, clay
",
Fines (230): 7.34% (SP - SC)
ed in laminae and pockets up to 1.0
-13.1
8.0
ments up to 1.0 ", clay decreases with
depth, olive graV (5Y-4/2), (SP-SC).
Sample #4, Depth = 8.8'
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace silt,
4
Mean (mm): 0.15, Phi Sorting: 0.31
-14.7
9.6
silt distributed in pockets up to 0.5 ", clay
distributed in laminae, grayish brown
Fines (230): 3.30% (SP)
10YR -5/2 P).
No Recovery.
-17.8
12.7
End of Boring
5AJ FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
15
-20
KI
Borina Desianation WPVC -11 -08
5A) FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
-0
;7
-10
15
20
-25
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
DRILLING LOG
of 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM :HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East : NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -08 X = 384,332 Y = 711,891
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY ' CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
' DISTURBED ' UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
5. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM BEARING
:STARTED COMPLETED
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
Q INCLINED i i
1S. DATE BORING
08 -17 -11 08:55 : 08 -17 -11 08:57
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -4.2 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16.4 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20.0 Ft.
BF
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
0
w
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
%
REC.
911111
Od
Ca
REMARKS
-4.2
0.0
W
J
m W
Shell Hash calculated from visual estimate of shell <4.75mm and >2.8mm.
SHELL HASH, some sand, some shell
Sample #1, Depth = 0.8'
fragments, trace rock fragments, trace silt, trace
1
Mean (mm): 1.42, Phi Sorting: 2.15
-5.8
1.6
whole shell, whole shells up to 2.0 ", shell
fragments typically up to 1.0 ", rock fragments
Fines (230): 0.69% (SW)
up to 0.5 ", (3.0 ")2.0 ") shell fragment @ 1.4',
Sample #2, Depth = 2.9'
gray 5Y -5/1 SW .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
2
Mean (mm): 0.59, Phi Sorting: 1.63
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
°
Fines (230): 1.00 /o (SW)
-8.4
4.2
shell, whole shells up to 1.5 ", shell fragments
u to 1.0" gray 2.5Y -6/1 SW .
Shelly SAND, trace silt, shell component is shell
Sample #3, Depth = 6.6'
hash, shell fragments and whole shells up to
", "x1.5 ")
3
Mean (mm): 0.75, Phi Sorting: 2.05
2.0 (1.0 rock fragment @ 6.9', gray
°
Fines (230): 1.10 /° (SW)
(2.5Y -6/1), (SW).
-13.01
8.8
Sample #4, Depth = 9.7'
SAND, some shell hash, trace shell fragments,
", "x1.5")
trace silt, shell fragments up to 1.0 (3.0
")2.75 ")
4
Mean (mm): 0.84, Phi Sorting: 1.90
whole shell @ 10.2', (2.0 whole shell @
Fines (230):5.88% ( SW -SM )
-14.8
10.6
10.5' light gray 2.5Y -7/2 SW -SM .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, silt
distributed in pockets up to 1.5" and laminae,
Sample #5, Depth = 13.0'
color is mottled dark olive brown (2.5Y -3/3),
5
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 0.33
brown (10YR -4/3) and, black (2.5Y- 2.5/1),
Fines (230):6.10% (SP -SM)
(SP -SM).
-20.0
15.8
'
-20.6
16.4
_'
Gravely CLAY, gravel component is rock
fragments up to 2.5" gray 5Y -6/1 ). (GW .
No Recovery.
-24.2
20.0
End of Boring
5A) FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
-0
;7
-10
15
20
-25
1°
fragments @ 14.9', 1.0" rock fragment @ 14.8',
arav (2.5Y -5/11. (CL).
CLAY, carbonate, trace rock fragments, trace
shell fragments, clay is partially lithified, shell
fragments up to 1.0 ", rock fragments up to 1.5 ",
End of Boring
5AJ FORM 'I S36 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
boring Liesl nation WPVC -11 -09
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, dark
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
grayish brown 10YR -4/2 (SP).
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management T
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL [:] AUTO HAMMER
7
WPVC -11 -09
X = 384,334 Y = 711,763
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY
CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
I DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Fines (230): 5.81 % (SP -SM)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES i ;
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
15.0
14. ELEVATION GROUNDWATER
5. DIRECTION OF BORING DEG. FROM n BEARING
® VERTICAL
VERTICAL
:STARTED COMPLETED
Q INCLINED
� �
15. DATE BORING
: 08 -17 -11 09:23 : 08 -17 -11 09:24
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -6,6 Ft,
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16.8 Ft.
18.
SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20.0 Ft.
KD
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
w
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
000
OXA.
REMARKS
-6.6
0.0
J
OQ
my
Shd Hash calm"ted from visual estimate M shel 0.75mm and >2.8mm.
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
bample Depth =
0
-7.6
1.0
trace silt, trace whole shell, whole shells up to
0.5" gray 5Y -6/1 (SW).
1
Mean (mm): 0.33, Phi Sorting: 1.18
Fines (230): 1.11 % (SW)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
trace rock fragments, trace shell fragments,
trace silt, trace whole shell, whole shells up to
Sample #2, Depth = 3.2'
(1.5 "x1.0 "), shell fragments up to 1.5 ", rock
2
Mean (mm): 0.94, Phi Sorting: 2.54
fragments typically up to (1.25 "x1.0 "),
Fines (230): 1.10% (SW)
(1.75 "x1.5 ") rock fragment @ 2.7', 1.0" silty
-11.6
5.0
pocket @ 2.9', 0.5" wood fragment @ 4.0', 1.0"
clayey pocket @ 5.0', 2 (4.0 "x1.0 ") grayish
5
brown (1 OYR -5/2) sandy pockets @ 4.2' and
Sample #3, Depth = 5.7'
4.8' gray 2.5Y -6/1 SW
3
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.71
-13.1
6.5
.
Fines (230): 3.02% (SP)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace day, trace
-13.9
7.3
organics, trace shell hash, trace silt, organics
distributed in pockets up to 0.5 ", clay distributed
4
Sample #4, Depth = 6.8'
Mean (mm): 0. 18, Phi Sorting: 0.62
in clayey pockets up to 0.75 ", grayish brown
Fines (230): 7.76% (SP -SM)
10YR -5/2 (SP).
5
Sample #5, Depth = 8.1'
-15.6
9.0
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace silt,
trace wood, clay distributed in clayey pockets up
Mean (mm): 0.21, Phi Sorting: 0.61
Fines (230): 5.38% (SP -SM)
to 0.75 ", wood fragments up to 0.5 ", dark
Sample #6, Depth = 10.5'
1 C
grayish brown 10YR -4/2 SP -SM .
6
Mean (mm): 0.21, Phi Sorting: 0.38
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt,
"x0.25 ")
Fines (230): 2.70% (SP)
(1.0 wood fragment @ 7.9', light
1°
fragments @ 14.9', 1.0" rock fragment @ 14.8',
arav (2.5Y -5/11. (CL).
CLAY, carbonate, trace rock fragments, trace
shell fragments, clay is partially lithified, shell
fragments up to 1.0 ", rock fragments up to 1.5 ",
End of Boring
5AJ FORM 'I S36 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
( L)"Inlsh gray (L.0T -0/L),
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, dark
grayish brown 10YR -4/2 (SP).
Sample #7, Depth = 13.1'
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace silt,
7
Mean (mm): 0.25, Phi Sorting: 0.66
clay distributed in clayey pockets up to 1.0 ",
Fines (230): 5.81 % (SP -SM)
-21.1
14.5
(3.0 "x1.0 ") gray (2.5Y -6/1) clayey pocket @
13.7', very dark grayish brown (1 OYR -3/2),
-21.6
15.0
1°
fragments @ 14.9', 1.0" rock fragment @ 14.8',
arav (2.5Y -5/11. (CL).
CLAY, carbonate, trace rock fragments, trace
shell fragments, clay is partially lithified, shell
fragments up to 1.0 ", rock fragments up to 1.5 ",
End of Boring
5AJ FORM 'I S36 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
Bnrina Desinnatinn WPVC- 11 -1f1
DRILLING LOG
I DIVISION
INSTALLATION - -
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
S. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -10 X = 384,526 Y = 711,946
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc. i
12. TOTAL SAMPLES i
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
5. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM BEARING
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
:STARTED iCOMPLETED
Q INCLINED � �
13 . DATE BORING
: 08 -16 -11 16:31 08-16 -11 16:33
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -4.5 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
18.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 9.4 Ft.
18.
SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 11.5 Ft.
KD
ELEV.
DEPTH
=
w
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
%
O�
(ft)
(ft)
W
Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
><<
O
REMARKS
-4.5
0.0
J
mh
Steel Hash calcJaled from Nsual estirta[e of steel e4.75mm mm
and >2.8
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
Sample #1, Depth = 1.3'
shell, whole shells up to (1.0'x0.75 "), shell
1
Mean (mm): 0.34, Phi Sorting: 1.59
fragments up to 1.0 ", 0.5" silty pocket @ 2.1',
Fines (230):1.12% (SW)
-7.2
2.7
gray (2.5Y-6/1), (SW).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell
fragments, little shell hash, trace silt, trace
Sample #2, Depth = 4.0'
whole shell, whole shells and shell fragments
2
Mean (mm): 0.63, Phi Sorting: 2.27
typically up to 1.5 ", (2.25 "x1.25 ") shell fragment
Fines (230):1.04% (SW)
-9.6
5.1
3.6' gray 2.5Y -6/1 (SW).
Sample #3, Depth = 5.3'
Mean (mm): 0.97, Phi Sorting: 2.40
Fines (230): 1.11 % (SW)
-10.1
5.6
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
3
shell, shell fragments typically up to 1.0 ", whole
Sample #4, Depth = 6.6'
shells up to 1.25 ", (2.0'x0.75 ") shell fragment
4
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.56
-12.2
7.7
52 ra 2.5Y -6/1 (SW).
Fines (230): 6.57% (SP -SM)
fine grained, quartz, trace day, trj
�SAND,
organics, trace silt, clay distributed in poc
Sample #5, Depth = 8.5'
upto 1.0" grayish brown 10YR -5/2 SP -
5
Mean (mm): 0.24, Phi Sorting: 0.66
-13.9
9.4
Fines (230):11.95% (SC)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some rock
fragments, little clay, trace organic�=tween k
fragments up to 3.0" and distributed
9.1' and 9.4' dark ra 2.5Y -4/1 C .
No Recovery.
-16.0
11.5
End of Boring
JPW rUKM ltS3b MUUII-ItU 1-UK I Fit F•LUKIUADEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
15
•20
25
0
c
c
v.
C
a
LL
Boring npsinnatinn WPV( -11_11
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL E] AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -11 X = 384,490 Y = 711,731
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
i
i
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
;
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
S. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM i BEARING
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
:STARTED COMPLETED
INCLINED
15. DATE BORING
: 08 -16 -11 13:56 08 -16 -11 13:58
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -1.1 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16.2 Ft.
18.
SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
8. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20.0 Ft,
TD
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
=
W
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
%
REC.
O-1
XIL
REMARKS
-1.1
0.0
J
O i
my
Shel Hash wkdated from visual estimate of shel 0.75mm and >2.8-
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell
fragments, little shell hash, trace silt, trace
Sample , #1
e #1, Depth = 2.0'
whole shell, shell fragments and whole shells
1
Mean 0.39 Phi Sorting: 1.23
,
up to 1.0 ", light gray (5Y -7/1), (SW).
Fines (mm): 0.39 (SW)
-4.6
3.5
Sample #2, Depth = 4.0'
SHELL HASH, some sand, trace shell
5.5
4.4
fragments, trace silt, trace whole shell, shell
fragments up to (1.5 "x1.0 "), whole shells up to
2
Mean (mm): 0.77, Phi Sorting: 1.57
Fines (230):1.05% (SW)
3
-6.4
5.3
1.5" gray 2.5Y -6/1 SW .
Sample #3, Depth = 4.7'
Mean (mm): 0.17, Phi Sorting: 0.52
Fines (230):1.70% (SP)
Sample #4, Depth = 5.6'
-6.9
5.8
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, shell
fragments up to 0.5 ", organic lamina @ 4.9',
4
-7.5
6.4
5
clayey lamina @ 5.0', light gray (2.5Y -7/1),
Mean (mm): 1.55, Phi Sorting: 2.42
Psilt,
6
Fines (230): 0.61 % (SW)
-9.3
8.2
SHELL, little sand, trace shell component is
shell hash, shell fragments u p to (2.0"x1.0") and
whole shells u to 1.5" gray 5-6/1 S .
Sample #5, Depth = 6.0'
Mean (mm): 0.30, Phi Sorting: 1.33
Fines (230):1.16% (SW)
-10.0
8.9
4
-10.8
9.7
6
Sample #6, Depth = 7.1'
Mean (mm): 0.32, Phi Sorting: 1.80
Fines (230):1.16% (SW)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
shell, whole shells up to 1.0 ", shell fragments
-11.3
10.2
7
up to 0.5" light gray (2.5Y-7/1), SW .
8
Sample #7, Depth = 9.9'
-12.9
11.8
Mean (mm): 0.24, Phi Sorting: 0.61
Fines (230):11.19% (SP -SM)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, trace
whole shell, shell fragments up to 1.0 ", whole
Sample #8, Depth = 11.0'
shells up to (1.5 "x1.0 "), organic lamina @ 7.9',
Mean (mm): 0.49, Phi Sorting: 2.06
li ht qray (2.5Y-7/1), (SW).
Fines (230):2.96% (SW)
SHELL, little sand, trace silt, shell component is
Sample #9, Depth = 13.6'
hell hash, shell fragments up to (2.0 "x1.0 ") and
9
Mean (mm): 0. 15, Phi Sorting: 0.23
whole shells up to 1.5 ", gray (5Y-6/1), (SW).
Fines (230): 2.47% (SP)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
-17.3
16.2
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, shell
fragments up to 1.0 ", 1.0" organic pocket @
9.4', 3.0" whole shell @ 9.5', light gray
2.5Y -7/1 SW .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little silt, trace day,
ve dark gray 2.5Y -3/1 SP -SM .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace
shell fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt,
-21.1
20.0
trace whole shell, whole shells up to 1.0 ", shell
fragments up to 1.5 ", clay, shell fragments and
hole shells decrease with depth, light brownish
gray (2.5Y-6/2), (SW).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, silt
distributed in laminae and pockets up to 0.25 ",
color is mottled light brownish gray (10YR -6/2)
and ra •sh brown 10YR -5/2 (SP).
No Recove .
End of Boring
SA) FORM 1836 MODIFIED FOR THE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
0
10
15
20
25
Rnrinn nacinnafinn WP \/(:_11 -17
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
of , SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF 61T 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM/DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURERS DESIGNATION OF DRILL Cj AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -12 X = 384,677 Y = 711,723
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc. ;
12. TOTAL SAMPLES ; i
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
5. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM i BEARING
VERTICAL � VERTICAL
,STARTED COMPLETED
Q INCLINED
15. DATE BORING
08 -16 -11 13:26 08 -16 -11 13:27
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -3,5 Ft,
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
18.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16.6 Ft.
18.
SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20.0 Ft.
BF
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
Z
Z
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
%
REC.
O�
Kf
REMARKS
-3.5
0.0
A
Oa
mq
Shall Hash calcJated from Nsual estimate of shel W.75n n and >2.&nm
Shelly SAND, trace silt, shell component is shell
Sample Depth =
-4.6
1.1
hash, whole shells up to 1.5" and shell
fragments up to 1.0" ra 5Y -6/1 (SW).
1
Mean (mm): 1.17, Phi Sorting: 2.11
Fines (230): 0.84% (SW)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell hash,
Sample #2, Depth = 2.0'
trace silt, shell hash decreases with depth, 0.5"
2
Mean (mm): 0.26, Phi Sorting: 1.20
-6.3
2.8
wood fragment @ 2.5', light gray (2.5Y -7/1),
(SW).
Fines (230):1.13% (SW)
Sample #3, Depth = 3.5'
-7.5
4.0
3
Mean (mm): 0.32, Phi Sorting: 1.53
Fines (230):0.95% (SW)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, trace
whole shell, shell fragments typically up to 1.0 ",
-8.0
4.5
1
whole shells typically up to 1.5 ", (3.0 "x 2.75 ')
whole shell @ 3.0', (2.5 ")2.0 ") rock fragment @
Sample #4, Depth = 5.5'
3.6' light brownish ra 2.5Y -6/2 SW .
4
Mean mm : O.p9, Phi Sorting: 0.
( ) 9 69
Shelly SAND, trace silt, shell component is shell
Fines (230): 4.34% (SP -SM)
-10.6
7.1
1.0 ", (3.0 ")2.5 ") shell fragment @
hash, whole shells and shell fragmii
5Y-6/1 (SW).
.
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace dalt,
Sample #5, Depth = 8.5'
trace wood, clay distributed in poc
5
Mean (mm): 0. 19, Phi Sorting: 0.50
0.5 ", wood fragments up to 1.0 ", d
Fines (230): 2.57% (SP)
-13.7
10.2
brown 2.5Y -3/3 SP -SM
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace day, trace si lt,
trace wood, wood fragments up to 1.0 ", clay
Sample #6, Depth = 11.2'
distributed in laminae, light olive brown
6
Mean (mm): 0.24, Phi Sorting: 0.44
-15.6
12.1
2.5Y -5/3 (SP)-
Fines (230): 1.11 % (SP)
Sample #7, Depth = 123
Mean (mm): 0.22, Phi Sorting: 0.55
-160
19
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, trace
wood, wood fragments up to 0.5 ", light brownish
7
gray 2.5Y -6/2 (SP).
Fines (230):6.23% (SP -SM)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, light dive
8
Sample #8, Depth = 13.4'
-17.9
14.4
brown 2.5Y -5/3 SP -SM .
Mean (mm): 0.15, Phi Sorting: 0.30
Fines (230):1.59% (SP)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, white
5Y -8/1 (SP).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace day, trace silt,
5
-20.1
16.6
clay distributed in laminae, silt increases with
depth, light olive brown 2.5Y -5/3 (SP).
No Recovery.
-23.5
20.0
End of Boring
SAJ rUKM -I04ta MUIJIFIEIJ 1-UK I FIE FLORIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
Wi
20
25
Rnrinn ndneinnnfinn \A /D \/(`_1 1 _14
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -13 X = 384,749 Y = 711,975
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY ' CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
: DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc. i
12. TOTAL SAMPLES i ;
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
S. DIRECTION OF BORING ; DEG. FROM i BEARING
® VERTICAL :VERTICAL
:STARTED COMPLETED
Q INCLINED � �
15. DATE BORING
� 08 -16 -11 13:00 08 -16 -11 13:02
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -3.8 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20.0 Ft.
KD
ELEV.
(f!)
DEPTH
(ft)
Z
w
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
Oj
O 6
REMARKS
-3.8
0.0
J
G2
my
Shell Hash caktlated from visual estimate of shell <4.75mm end >2.8m
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
6ample #1, Uepth -
-4.8
1.0
trace shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
shell, shell fragments up to 0.75 ", whole shells
1
Mean (mm): 0.37, Phi Sorting: 0.97
Fines (230): 1.04% (SW)
-5.7
1.9
up to 1.25 ", 1.5" rock fragment @ 0.1',
"x1.25 ") rock fragment @ 0.1', (3.0 "x2.0 ")
2
Sample #2, Depth = 1.4'
Mean (mm): 1.58, Phi Sorting: 2.32
XT(2.25
rock fra ment 0.3' gray 2.5Y -5/1 SW .
3
Fines (230): 0.63% (SW)
-7.0
3.2
SHELL, some sand, trace rock fragments, shell
component is shell hash, shell fragments and
whole shells up to 1.5 ", rock fragments up to
Sample #3, Depth = 2.6'
Mean (mm): 0.25, Phi Sorting: 1.10
Fines (230):1.46% (SW)
7.9
4.1
2
0.75" gray 2.5Y -6/1 SW .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
trace shell fragments, trace shell hash, trace
silt, trace whole shell, shell fragments and
Sample #4, Depth = 6.3'
whole shells up to 1.25" gray 2.5Y -6/1 (SW).
4
Mean (mm): 0.27, Phi Sorting: 1.16
SHELL, some sand, trace rock fragments, trace
Fines (230):1.28% (SW)
silt, shell component is shell hash, shell
fragments up to 1.5" and whole shells up to
12.3
8.5
1.25 ", rock fragments up to 1.5 ", gray
Sample #5, Depth = 9.0'
-13.3
9.5
2.5Y -6/1 (SW).
5
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.67
Fines (230): 7.02% (SP -SM)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
fragments, trace shell hash, trace whole shell,
-14.5
10.7
whole shells typically up to 1.5 ", shell fragments
up to 1.0 ", (2.0 "x1.5 ") rock fragment @ 4.7',
6
Sample #6, Depth = 10.1'
Mean (mm): 0.22, Phi Sorting: 0.53
Fines 230:3.45% SP
(11.2'
15.2
11.4
(1.5 "x1.0 ") rock fragment @ 4.7', (3.0 "X1.5 ")
7
Sample #7) Depth =
whole shell 7.0' gray 2.5Y -6/1 (SW).
8
Mean (mm): 0.84, Phi Sorting: 1.86
-16.4
12.6
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, 0.5" wood
fragment @ 9.1', very dark grayish brown
10YR -3/2 SP -SM .
Fines (mm): 4.84, (SW-SM)
Sample #8, Depth = 12.0'
Mean (mm): 0.24, Phi Sorting: 0.40
-17.0
13.2
9
13.7
-17.5
SAND, fine grained, quartz trace day, trace silt,
10
clay distributed in clayey pockets up to 0.5 ",
Fines (230): 6.40% (SP -SM)
-18.7
14.9
(3.0 "x0.75 ") silty pocket @ 10.6', grayish brown
10YR -5/2 (SP).
11
Sample #9, Depth = 12.8'
Mean (mm): 0.19, Phi Sorting: 0.59
-19.8
16.0
Fines (230): 9.37% (SP -SM)
Sample #10, Depth = 13.4'
Mean (mm): 0.14, Phi Sorting: 0.41
SHELL HASH, little sand, trace whole shell,
whole shells up to 1.0 ", 0.5" wood fragments @
10.8' and 11.0', 3.0" sand pocket @ 10.9', light
Fines (230): 3.17% (SP)
gray 2.5Y -7/2 SW -SM .
Sample #11, Depth = 14.4'
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
"x1.0 ")
Mean (mm): 0. 15, Phi Sorting: 0.48
trace silt, (2.0 clayey pocket @ 12.5',
Fines (230):13.35% (SC)
very dark brown 10YR -2/2 SP -SM .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace day, trace silt,
23.8
20.0
grayish brown 10YR -5/2 SP -SM .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace silt, silt
distributed in laminae, light gray (2.5Y -7/1),
(SP).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little day, grayish
brown 2.5Y -5/2 (SC).
Sandy CLAY, some rock fragments, trace shell
fragments, day is partially lithified, rock
fragments up to 3.0 ", shell fragments up to 1.0 ",
-gray 2.5Y -6/1 (CL).
No Recovery.
aiju ruKm -jOSo muulrltu FOR T HE FLUKIDA DEP
JUN 02 JUN 04 End of Boring
10
15
20
25
Rnrinn liacinnnfinn WP\ /('. -11_1A
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION - - -
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -14 X=384,775 Y = 711,866
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
Athena Technologies, Inc. i
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
5. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM i BEARING
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
:STARTED COMPLETED
Q INCLINED � �
15. DATE BORING
� 08 -16 -11 14:26 08 -16 -11 14:28
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -1.1 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft.
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16.9 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20.0 Ft.
KD
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
c
W
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
%
REC.
11:W
06
X2
REMARKS
-1.1
0.0
J
lay
Shel Hash calculated from visual estimate of shell <4.75mm and >2.8
Shelly SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace rock
fragments, trace shell fragments, trace silt,
Sample #1, Depth = 1.3'
trace whole shell, shell component is shell
1
Mean (mm): 0.77, Phi Sorting: 2.02
hash, rock frags. up to 1 ", whole shells up to
",
Fines (230): 0.91 % (SW)
-3.71
2.6
1.75 shell frags. typically up to 1.5 ", (2 "x1.5 ")
shell fra 0.2' 2.5Y -6/1 SW
Sample #2, Depth = 3.2'
Mean (mm): 0.52, Phi Sorting: 1.70
Fines (230):1.16% (SW)
-4.4
3.3
. gray .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell hash,
trace organics, trace shell fragments, trace silt,
2
shell frags. typically up to 0.75 ", (3 "x2 ') shelly
3
Sample #3, Depth = 4.0'
6.0
4.9
pocket @ 3', shell component is shell hash,
shell frags. up to 2" and whole shells up to 1 ",
Mean (mm): 0.23, Phi Sorting: 0.66
Fines (230):1.32% (SP)
gray 2.5Y -6/1 (SW).
4
Sample #4, Depth = 5.5'
-7.2
6.1
Mean (mm): 0.25, Phi Sorting: 1.64
Fines (230):9.99% (SW -SM)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
trace shell fragments, trace shell hash, trace
silt, shell frags. up to 0.75 ", (3 ")2 ") organicy
5
Sample #5, Depth = 6.8'
-8.7
7.6
pocket @ 3.5', (1.25 "x0.5 ") whole shell @ 4.8',
light gray (2.5Y-7/1), (SP).
Mean (mm): 0.22, Phi Sorting: 0.58
Fines (230):1.86% (SP)
6
-9.6
8.5
Sample #6, Depth = 8.1'
Mean (mm): 0.38, Phi Sorting: 1.71
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell
fragments, little silt, trace organics, trace shell
hash, trace whole shell, shell frags. up to 1.5 ",
7
Fines (230):1.54% (SW)
-11.2
10.1
whole shells up to 1 ", grayish brown (2.5Y -5/2),
SW -SM .
Sample #7, Depth = 9.2'
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.56
-12.0
10.9
8
Fines (230):4.17% (SP -SM)
Sample #8, Depth = 10.5'
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell hash,
trace silt light gray (2.5Y-7/1). (SP).
9
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, trace
-13.1
12.0
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sating: 0.63
Fines (230):7.86% (SP -SM)
-14.3
13.2
whole shell, shell frags. up to 1.25 ", whole
shells up to 1.5 ", silty pockets up to 0.5 ", light
10
Sample #9, Depth = 11.5'
Mean (mm): 0.21, Phi Sorting: 0.51
15.3
14.2
brownish gray 2.5Y -6/2 (SW).
11
Fines (230): 3.61 % (SP)
Sample #10, Depth = 12.6'
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little organics, trace
clay, trace silt, clay distrib. in clayey pockets up
Mean (mm): 0. 17, Phi Sorting: 0.45
to 1" dark grayish brown 1 OYR -4/2 SP -SM .
Fines (230): 2.21 % (SP)
12
Sample #11, Depth = 13.7'
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace
organics, trace silt, clay distrib. in clayey
Mean (mm): 0.69, Phi Sorting: 2.18
-18.0
16.9
' '
pockets up to 0.5 ", very dark brown (10YR -2/2),
SP -SM .
Fines (230): 3.87% (SW)
Sample #12, Depth = 15.0'
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.40
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace
organics, trace silt, day distrib. in clayey
Fines (230): 3.76% (SP)
pockets up to 1 ", very dark grayish brown
10YR -3/2 (SP).
-21.1
20.0
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
trace silt, (3 "x1 ") silty pocket @ 13', grayish
brown 10YR -5/2 SID.
SHELL, some sand, trace silt, shell component
is shell hash, shell frags. and whole shells up to
1" light brownish gray (2.5Y-6/2), (SW).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little organics, trace
silt, color is mottled dark grayish brown
(1OYR -4/2) and, very dark brown (1OYR -2/2),
SP .
No Recove .
oiv rvmivl IOSO mvulrlCu rVK 1 Mt rLUK1UA ULF
JUN 02 JUN 04 End of Boring
10
15
20
25
Borina Desinnatinn WPVC- 11 -1.r,
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEMIDATUM :HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL Q AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -15 X = 384,937 Y = 711,907
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
i
Athena Technologies, Inc.
12. TOTAL SAMPLES
;
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
S. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM BEARING
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
:STARTED COMPLETED
Q INCLINED i 1S.
DATE BORING ' 08 -16 -11 12:28 08 -16 -11 12:30
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft. 16.
ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -1.9 Ft.
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0.0 Ft. 17.
TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 16.2 Ft.
18.
SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20.0 Ft.
BF
ELEV.
(ft)
DEPTH
(ft)
Z
ILI
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
�W
Gil
Of
REMARKS
1.9
0.0
J
Q
D%
Shell Hash cakJated from Visual estimate of shell <4.75mm and >2.8-
SAND, fine grained, trace shell fragments, trace
Sample #1, Depth = 1.0'
shell hash, trace silt, trace whole shell, whole
",
1
Mean (mm): 0.33, Phi Sorting: 1.69
shells up to 1.0 shell fragments up to
Fines (230):1.26% (SW)
-3.8
1.9
1.75 "x0.75" gray 2.5Y -5/1 (SW).
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace clay, trace
shell fragments, trace shell hash, trace whole
Sample #2, Depth = 2.8'
shell, whole shells up to 1.5 ", shell fragments
2
Mean (mm): 0.190 Phi Sorting: 1.22
-5.8
3.9
up to 1.0 ", clay distributed in pockets up to 1.0 ",
gray 2.5Y -5/1 (SW).
Fines (230): 2.43% (SW)
SAND, fine grained, quartz, some shell hash,
Sample #3, Depth = 4.7'
little shell fragments, trace silt, trace whole
3
Mean (mm): 0.65, Phi Sorting: 2.13
shell, whole shells up to 2.25 ", shell fragments
Fines (230):0.90% (SW)
-8.3
6.4
up to 2.0 ", (1.0 ")2.0 ") rock fragment @ 5.6',
(3.0 "x1.5 ") rock fragment @ 4.2', gray (5Y -6/1),
SAND, fine grained, trace shell hash, trace silt,
ra 5Y -6/1 (SP).
Sample #4, Depth = 6.7'
Mean (mm): 0.23, Phi Sorting: 0.81
Fines (230):1.13% (SP)
Sample #5, Depth = 7.3'
-8.9
7,0
4
-9.4
7.5
5
6
Mean (mm): 0.59, Phi Sorting: 2.54
Shelly SAND, fine grained, trace silt, shell
-11.1
9.2
' '
component is shell hash, shell fragments up to
2.0" and whole shells up to 1.0 ", gray
Fines (230): 8.42% (SW -SM)
Sample #6, Depth = 8.5'
2.5Y -6/1 SW -S
Mean (mm): 0.18, Phi Sorting: 0.57
SAND, fine grained, trace clay, trace shell hash,
7
Fines (230): 3.34% (SP)
trace silt, trace wood, clay distributed in pockets
Sample #7, Depth = 10.4'
-13.4
11.5
up to 1.0" and laminae, wood fragments up to
(3.0 "x0.5 "), dark grayish brown (1 OYR -4/2),
Mean (mm): 0.24, Phi Sorting: 0.51
Fines (230): 2.62% (SP)
SP .
Sample #8, Depth = 12.6'
grained, trace clay, trace silt, trace
8
Mean (mm): 0.72, Phi Sorting: 2.05
stributed in pockets up to 2.0 ", wood
Fines (230):1.95% (SW)
-15.7
13.8
ESAND
up to 1.0 ", clay distributed in pockets
li ht olive brown 2.5Y -5/3 (SP).
Sample #9, Depth = 14.7'
Shelly SAND, fine grained, trace silt, shell
g
Mean (mm): 0.16, Phi Sorting: 0.53
component is shell hash, while shells up to 1.5"
",
Fines (230): 13.22% (SM)
-17.8
15.9
and shell fragments up to 1.0 light gray
2.5Y -7/2 (SW).
SAND, fine grained, little silt, trace clay, clay
Sample #10, Depth = 16.1'
Mean (mm): 0. 15, Phi Sorting: 0.46
10
distributed in laminae gray 5Y -5/1 ), (SM .
Fines (230): 5.10% (SP -SM)
SAND, fine grained, trace silt, light gray
5Y -7/1 SP -SM .
No Recovery.
-21.9
20.0
End of Boring
u tUKM 9tsib MUUIFIEU FUR THE FLOKIDADEP
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
ib7
•20
25
Rnrinn Ilacinnnfinn WP \ /r_11_1R
DRILLING LOG
DIVISION
INSTALLATION
SHEET 1
OF 1 SHEETS
1. PROJECT
9. SIZE AND TYPE OF BIT 3.0 In.
Wiggins Pass Inlet Management
10. COORDINATE SYSTEM /DATUM HORIZONTAL VERTICAL
Collier County, FL
Florida State Plane East NAD 1983 NAVD 88
2. BORING DESIGNATION LOCATION COORDINATES
11. MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF DRILL AUTO HAMMER
WPVC -11 -16 X = 384,973 Y = 711,790
Electric Q MANUAL HAMMER
3. DRILLING AGENCY CONTRACTOR FILE NO.
DISTURBED UNDISTURBED (UD)
Athena Technologies, Inc. ;
12. TOTAL SAMPLES i i
4. NAME OF DRILLER
13. TOTAL NUMBER CORE BOXES
Palmer McLellan
14. ELEVATION GROUND WATER
5. DIRECTION OF BORING i DEG. FROM 7 BEARING
® VERTICAL VERTICAL
:STARTED COMPLETED
Q INCLINED � �
1 5. DATE BORING
: 08 -16 -11 11:25 08 -16 -11 11:27
6. THICKNESS OF OVERBURDEN 0.0 Ft.
16. ELEVATION TOP OF BORING -2,9 Ft,
7. DEPTH DRILLED INTO ROCK 0,0 Ft,
17. TOTAL RECOVERY FOR BORING 14.4 Ft.
18. SIGNATURE AND TITLE OF INSPECTOR
S. TOTAL DEPTH OF BORING 20.0 Ft.
KD
ELEV.
DEPTH
C
W
CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS
MW
OIL
(ft)
(ft)
W
Depths and elevations based on measured values
REC.
REMARKS
-2.9
0.0
J
my%
SheA Hash caWated from visual estimate & shill <4.75mm and >2.8mm.
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
am a Depth =
-3.9
1.0
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, trace
whole shell, shell fragments up to 1.25 ", whole
1
Mean (mm): 0.27, Phi Sorting: 1.41
Fines (230):2.44% (SW)
2
-4.7
1.8
•
shells u to 1.0" ra 2.5Y -6/1 SW
Sample #2, Depth = 1.4'
Mean (mm): 0.48, Phi Sorting: 2.25
o
.
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell
fragments, little shell hash, trace silt, trace
3
Fines (230):1.39% (SW)
-6.5
3.6
whole shell, shell fragments up to 1.5 ", whole
Sample #3, Depth = 2.5'
shells u to 1.25" gray 2.5Y -6/1 SW
Mean (mm): 0.46, Phi Sorting: 2.27
Fines (230):1.15% (SW)
.
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace shell
fragments, trace shell hash, trace silt, trace
Sample #4, Depth = 4.7'
whole shell, whole shells up to 1.0 ", shell
4
Mean (mm): 0.17, Phi Sorting: 0.52
-8.9
6.0
fragments typically up to 1.5 ", silty pockets up to
0.5 ", (2.0"x1.0 ") shell fragment @ 2.6', 0.5"
Fines (230):1.69% (SP)
-9.8
6.9
wood fragment @ 3.0', light gray (2.5Y -7/1),
(SW).
2
SAND, fine grained, quartz, trace organics,
trace shell hash, trace silt, 1.0" silty pocket @
3.8', (2.5 "x0.5 ") clay pocket @ 4.1', (2.5 "4.25 ")
Sample #5, Depth = 9.1'
wood fragment 4.1' gray 2.5Y -6/1 SP .
5
Mean (mm): 0.23, Phi Sorting: 0.65
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little shell
Fines (230):1.97% (SP)
fragments, little shell hash, trace silt, trace
whole shell, shell fragments and whole shells
-14.0
11.1
typically up to 1.5 ", (3.0'X1.0 ") shell fragment @
6.4' gray 2.5Y -6/1 SW .
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little peat, trace
shell hash, trace silt, trace whole shell, whole
Sample #6, Depth = 12.5'
shells up to 1.0 ", peat distributed in laminae and
6
Mean (mm): 0.17, Phi Sorting: 0.54
pockets up to 3.0 ", (1.75 "x1.5 ") rock fragment
Fines (230):14.44% (SC)
-16.9
14.0
@ 8.8', (2.25 "x0.75 ") wood fragment @ 10.1',
(2.0 "x1.5 ") shell fragment @ 11.0', light
brownish gray 10YR -6/2 SP .
_
SAND, fine grained, quartz, little clay,
(3.0 "x1.0 ") white (2.5Y -8/1) pocket @ 11.3',
gray 2.5Y -5/1 SC .
ROCK FRAGMENTS, some sand, trace clay,
trace shell hash, rock fragments up to
3.0'X1.0" gray 2.5Y -6/1 GW .
No Recovery.
-22.9
20.0
End of Boring
JAi i-VK1Vi "1830 MVUIrItU l-UK I Mt t-LUKIUAUt1'
JUN 02 JUN 04
10
15
20
25
APPENDIX 5
FENCEPOST DIAGRAMS
GACollierM950063 WIGGINS PASS
GEO\ MXD \REPORTFI(3URES \F um 4.mx0
m U t A W N
OZ
d
O . o. ao a
� 2 ��N
a
O °. 3.0
.
1
tD
T
o
°IDmSfif °3�?
m
3 -gym
F < O
B
0 m z m
y
O (7 0>
a
N
9 d
Q
a Z �
3� � o
D °
n
o
o
�R 3 0
'
z �.
fD m � a °
d
m _ g
d N
3 nc
0
C N m
N
Z
r
+
e
• > O 0 It
{{(yip
N N N
W t0 N j I7
S n n n
P. V V V
3 m m m
m
3 v d @
g Q o 0
® I
T N N
O O
m O O
° O
A �
N p m
ni V
f°
o
m
3 p
W y
m m
3
y
m
0
E _
n
S
N
00
�
O
E
O �
� �
I
� ���i j� � � i�E i���, j�l l� I`� �� � �, it
E
✓y � � � �.
4DO
w f a5
a
R> m fi
_
p
W
�p
g,
'
Z
4 c a
'�
7'
o
oz
s� �z
y,2
O
O
'
W
A Z A
�Z
SID
r lb
N O
M
G)
N A O W
O W A N O O
Z
L
2
O
All
W
LEGEND
Sand ( <5% fines, may include <10% rock and /or rock fragments)
Sand (5 -10% fines, may include <10% rock and /or rock fragments)
Sand (10 -20% fines, may include <10% rock and /or rock fragments)
Shelly Sand (may include <10% rock and /or rock fragments)
Peat and Organics (may include <10% rock and /or rock fragments)
Organic Clay (may include <10% rock and /or rock fragments)
Clay (may include <10% rock and /or rock fragments)
Rock or Rock Fragments ( >10% rock and /or rock fragments)
M
CD
N
0
7
LU
CD
CZ
O D
Z-
D
0
00
00
Elevation (ft)
............. 13
N
°
A
..... ...... ...... ......
......
.................... c
to to p.
c
< m
m
o tO
Q
rt
a e a
n
�Q
°
!
to
n N
O
fl
CD N
0
O —
C CD
7 �
-t•
Q
r- C2
r Q
«Z
CD
3
CD
........... ............................... ......... ......... :.............. .................. ................................ ..IN
0
v
CD
v
C
N
O
7
Q_
CD
Q_
0
N
CT
Q
A
Q.
O
7
3
0
Q
N
C
W
d
Q
C
m
N
M
co
0
:3
u 00
N
cn
CD
CL
0 00
Z
00
OD
Elevation (ft)
O 00 Of t
N
CO
SE
co
C)
............................................. ......... ............ ........
........
7
............. C
=r
................. ......... ......... ................
rm =0
O
................... ........ ........ ........
ws*
(D
8
........ ........ ........
................ .. .......... : ........ ........ .......... : .......... : .......... : ........ ........ .......... :-
o
C,
0 "
S'
to
tG
2-
CD N
0
C (b
O
Cb
3
(b
rt
m m
............. ..................................
......................... ........ ....................................... ........ ......
'I., I I I I I I
9 a a zz ;z
CD
0
:3
C4
CA
0
CL
0
0
3
(D
(D
CL
.c
2-
C
(D
co
co
C)
7
............. C
=r
rm =0
ws*
(D
8
........ ........ ........
................ .. .......... : ........ ........ .......... : .......... : .......... : ........ ........ .......... :-
00
no
C,
0 "
S'
....... .......
to
tG
2-
CD N
0
C (b
O
Cb
3
(b
rt
m m
............. ..................................
......................... ........ ....................................... ........ ......
'I., I I I I I I
9 a a zz ;z
CD
0
:3
C4
CA
0
CL
0
0
3
(D
(D
CL
.c
2-
C
(D
co
GuKL MMUL PVSIS - A SILL
M
CD
LU
O
7
Q
w
CD
a-
0
_
Z
D
0
00
00
N
n
v
�rt
°
7
N
X S O
A
N
O
W
wow
CO
L4 L4 CIA
LM
��wms+r
nv
I 01. < rn
ro c=
m
o f°
p a a s' r'
�N 00
O
no
° ?
rt
G °
O
R.
n
O N
^� aJ
l / cn
O —
E
,1
O =3
Q CO
D) CD
3
CD
Elevation (ft)
........: .......... :.......... .................................. ....... ....... ....... ...... ...................... o
I I 1 o
W Of A N
v
v
S
N
n
O
n.
n_
O
7
N
CAQ'
n
W
d
O
7
3
M
°
N
C
N
n_
n
c
m
N
ra w
A
N
O
W
Of
A
N
LM
M
A
N
O
4 a
p a a s' r'
S e.....:....
• .
S
o
O
8....:
....
:..........:
......:....
.....
.....
...
.......
I
0
w
V.........:................
................:..............
.....
. N
Z
•
t i
9 `4 4
O
a •4 b
CD
N
......... :. .........�
......... .: .. ...
... .. ..
... .......
C
� s a
cn
N
n
........: .......... :.......... .................................. ....... ....... ....... ...... ...................... o
I I 1 o
W Of A N
v
v
S
N
n
O
n.
n_
O
7
N
CAQ'
n
W
d
O
7
3
M
°
N
C
N
n_
n
c
m
N
ra w
•.
CD
........: .......... :.......... .................................. ....... ....... ....... ...... ...................... o
I I 1 o
W Of A N
v
v
S
N
n
O
n.
n_
O
7
N
CAQ'
n
W
d
O
7
3
M
°
N
C
N
n_
n
c
m
N
•.
CD
} r
a• s a a -ate a
4 a
p a a s' r'
S e.....:....
• .
S
o
I
V.........:................
................:..............
.....
. N
•
t i
9 `4 4
a •4 b
N
......... :. .........�
......... .: .. ...
... .. ..
... .......
� s a
........: .......... :.......... .................................. ....... ....... ....... ...... ...................... o
I I 1 o
W Of A N
v
v
S
N
n
O
n.
n_
O
7
N
CAQ'
n
W
d
O
7
3
M
°
N
C
N
n_
n
c
m
N
-4.4 - A ]ILL
-7
M
CD
0
CD
0-
O
z
co
Elevation (ft)
1
C, co m A N O co C" -P,
........... ............
.............................. ................ ........... : ... IA. ............. .........
OOi
.................... .......... .......... .......... .......... ...... . . ......... I ..... ..........
3
0 cn
— -0
iD
a)
C/)
0 U)
0
C:
:3
0
0) CD
3
CD
................. .......... .......... ......... .... .........
O 1
CD
S.
0
to
N
0-
(D
CL
0
(D
C
I
CD
ID
0
cn
...................
.......... .......... ........... * ......... ......... ......... C�
S O
x
a
CA (14 (A :3)
(D
ID
w
COOD
6
Go
OmCD
00 .
..... .............
......... .......... 00
0 CD
C3
.......... ......... ......... C�
CD,
O
3
0 cn
— -0
iD
a)
C/)
0 U)
0
C:
:3
0
0) CD
3
CD
................. .......... .......... ......... .... .........
O 1
CD
S.
0
to
N
0-
(D
CL
0
(D
C
I
CD
ID
0
A WM
I
M
CD
r.
0
:3
CT M
0)
U)
CD
CL
0 M
Z
00
co
(a
ce.
:3
C-)
2-
=0
0
C N
3
CD
rt
Elevation
.......... .......... ............................ .... ........ ..........
o
....... ............ — * ........ ......... .....................................
Go
........... ..........
............. .........
.......... ............
............. ........................
to
D
8 —
..........
=-
X r 0
W
0
rnTPm3
0
(AL4L4="2
,c
--CA
C23
0
1 10—
coo
to
CD
T
00
0 0
.......... ........................
;M0
.....................
(a
ce.
:3
C-)
2-
=0
0
C N
3
CD
rt
Elevation
.......... .......... ............................ .... ........ ..........
o
............
.......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... . .......
O
O
LM
Ln....... ..........
CD
....... ............ — * ........ ......... .....................................
is
Q
........... ..........
............. .........
.......... ............
............. ........................
cn
......
..........
..........
.... 8 ..
........ .......... ...... ....... ....... .......... .. ...................... .......... .......... .... Ln
............
.......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ........... .......... . .......
O
O
LM
Ln....... ..........
CD
....... ............ — * ........ ......... .....................................
is
Q
..........
..........
........... ..........
cn
......
..........
..........
.... 8 ..
3e:
.......... ........................
.....................
........
6 ............ .......
CD
....... ........ ..........
....... ........... .......... ....... .......................
........ .............
a)
rt
ca
0
CA
CA
(A
CD
CL
3
CD
0
CA
CL
0
C
CD
(A
..........
..........
..........
........... ..........
I .......... ..........
......
..........
..........
.... 8 ..
CD
CA
A ..........
..........
..........
..........
........... .......
.......... ..........
....................
............
..........
a)
rt
ca
0
CA
CA
(A
CD
CL
3
CD
0
CA
CL
0
C
CD
(A
CURL tLMUL POSTS - A SRLL
Elevation (ft)
;1
7
C7 N
O -D
Q
CD (A
0
O —
C CD
7 �
Q
r Q
to
cD
3
CD
.......; ....................% .........; .........; ........::...................;..........;.........,...... ...:.........,.........,....Icn
\7 �, \�.
IS=,
N
O
7
[1
m�
<I
O
0
N
O
N
W
d
O
3
c
N
C
W
CL
C
CD
N
Of A
N O O Of A N
O CID
O
_m
O
.
�s
. ... :
�...e.;�.., ♦,y.y 1..
. . ..
.. °
CD
�.
<
o
�
of
O
7
CT
N
�'
..............................
:......... :.......... .......... :.......... ........
...... ................... ......
......
.. G
Q.
O
7
Z
D
<
00
p_
O
.........:.. .............................:
.........:........ ...... ......
.................... ...... ......
.....
... C
00
`
n:
'
: ..... ......
I:
U;
........... ...... ...... ......
........
O
O
co
ZO
'1.
0
p —
C) N
S 0
rn�-rn =
a -•
0
CA
=wms�
c
c............................
.. .................:.........:...
C "(s
rt
u
O
7
W
.. .'. . .
1
... .:..
..;.... is
o
°
;1
7
C7 N
O -D
Q
CD (A
0
O —
C CD
7 �
Q
r Q
to
cD
3
CD
.......; ....................% .........; .........; ........::...................;..........;.........,...... ...:.........,.........,....Icn
\7 �, \�.
IS=,
N
O
7
[1
m�
<I
O
0
N
O
N
W
d
O
3
c
N
C
W
CL
C
CD
N
M
CD
w
ZS
G)
CD
CL
S b )
z
00
00
JFMLILUDI 9113/11
Elevation
I I I I I
4 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
O 00 -M
..........
O
............ : ..... - - * �- * - - * ''! ... - - * -� - - * * - *,:* ... * ..... ....... *,*:,*,*'',, ': ........... : ..... * ................ ! ... * Irm
:E
CQ
CD
CA
2- --a
= 93
M CA
CA
0 =3
C CD
ca
............. :, * ..... ***t-**'-*:* ...................... : ...................... ! ............. * ......... : .......... t * .... - - ! .... 1,2
....I ... .......... ; ........ ... I ....... : .... I ..... I .......... ; .......... : ....... : .......... .......... ; .... 5,4
O
CD
0
La
La
fT
CD
0.
0
3
(D
C
CD
CD
0.
CD
N
........... I ...... ....... ........... ... ...... .......
00
0
rA*
=r 0
CD
" _V
. . .......... .......... ...............
... ......... .......
rnr'P��
to
C.4
cc
OD
O
........... *1
CI
QfN cz)
no
46
910
.......... .......... I .......... .......... ........... .......... I .......... ...................... .......... ..........
:E
CQ
CD
CA
2- --a
= 93
M CA
CA
0 =3
C CD
ca
............. :, * ..... ***t-**'-*:* ...................... : ...................... ! ............. * ......... : .......... t * .... - - ! .... 1,2
....I ... .......... ; ........ ... I ....... : .... I ..... I .......... ; .......... : ....... : .......... .......... ; .... 5,4
O
CD
0
La
La
fT
CD
0.
0
3
(D
C
CD
CD
0.
CD
N
F
M_
CD
G
O
D
cr
N
CD
Q.
O
7 _
Z
G
Q
00
00
N
N O 00 Of A
co
_v
=0
fA
�N
O
p
7
XX O
Cf
<D
_
W w 3 t�
tC
t0 U> P R
G
< m
CD
O to
7
(n" Np
0
CD
N
��
G............ .............
............ ............ ............ ............ ............
n
0
VI...............:...................
R.
CO
CQ
O u)
T
n Cl)
O -
C �
O :3
Q. �Q
0) CD
3
CD
MNZk— rAn— ZUlidLW8— VQ,W'J JrUKA ILW11 U 114/11
Elevation (ft)
1 1
VI A
N O 00 Of A
N
O
t
0
Ol
a...............:...............
................................ ..... ........... .................................
... c
G............ .............
............ ............ ............ ............ ............
............
. p
VI...............:...................
.............................:.
N
O...................
N
O
4 �
............... :...............
:............... :................................ :................. ...........
.c°,1 .:....................
0
L4
o............ ............
........... ............ ............ .............................
w
o
0
0
..............................:.
.............................. ......................... .......:................:......
. .... �
'r
O
O............... ....................................................................
...............................
............
... Q
O
1 1
1 1 1 I 1
1
A N O O O A N
v
m
N
7
d
O
m
<
O
O
3
N
tT
0
W
CL
O
7
m
0
N
C
d
D
C
tD
N
A SIZE
I
M
CD
m
O
C
Q _
O
7
Z
D
C
00
OD
Elevation (ft)
0 1 I I 1
OO Of A N O co Of A N O
.. ..............................
o'a+'
0
y y -
.. •............ ..... �... .
t _ .
I
O
00
O............•
.............:.............:..........
............................... .................................... ......... .. p
C")
_v,
o
0
Z G
N
O
7
X O
Cf �
m
o _.
w Ort�
(O
(0
O
O
........... .- ...........
...........
.i•i•..t '� #.� ♦ ;..i t t„R .�E R.� #_ ..}... .. 4
.�.. .... ....... ......... .. O
O C
�W
m
0
#O 01 0 a
m
m N O N
m
`i
Of
QG
o
............:. ............:.
........ ... .: ........... .:........ ....:.............:............ .:.............:........... ......... .. o
O
R.
O c
� N
n N
O
C
RG
TI �
O
SZ rQ
v m
3
CD
.. .... .............. .. ............: ..........................;.............;............:............... ...........;............;..••lo
1 I I I 1 co cn N o
:n rn a ti a
CO
0
0
v
m
v
N
n
7
CL
m
m
0
0
N
Q�
D
m
L1
O
3
m
0
N
C
m
CL
C
ID
N
rUJIS - A SILL
I
m
CD
N
0
3
6 C—
w
cn
C
Q
0 C-
7
Z
D
v
ao
au
N
v
Z �
N
ME
7
x�
<D
to
��wWPr
o
I I <
I CO a
N
Of N O m
N
D �
�
D
O
7
P.
0 �.
CA
l /
0 —
I_
0 M
Q co
a) a)
3
CD
I
Elevation (ft)
ol....... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ................... ..... ......
..... ..... . ...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ...... ............ ..... ..... .. Ir.
O
O
v
m
a
N
O
7
CL
0
0
N
Q
0
a
O
7
3
CDtD
a
c
m
a
0
CD
N
I
Elevation
.......... ........... ........... ........................ ....................... ............. ..........
C)
ca M a
co
cn--
t
x =
n
40
........... ............ ...........
........... ........... ............ ........... ........................ .......
.:CD
,:•
oqe..
m
p....
...... ............
WOE
CA
,ACA4- =
(040
caG <
N
<
.
........... ...........
.
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
07 00
0
O
tii
cn
.
........... ............
........... ........... ...........
CD
Cp
.......................
...........
.............
CL
0
Z
tj
........... . ..........
........... ...........
OD
.. . ...... .........................
. . ......
...........
.......
....
co
.......... ........... ........... ........................ ....................... ............. ..........
R.
(0
(2.
0
0
(n
0 cn
0
0 ::3
cc
0) CD
3
CD
.: ............ : ........... : ...... ........ * — * — * '': ........ ........... : ........ ! .... 1-0-
............ : ........... ........... ; ........... : ..................... ; ........... I ........... : ........... z ...........
............ : ........... ! .......... ...... - * -:- ........ : ........... ! ...... * .... ........... : ........... ........... ! .... IqO
rt
=r
0
CA
ca
CD
a-
0
CD
CD
0
CA
C
C
O
Z
CA
x =
n
40
........... ............ ...........
........... ........... ............ ........... ........................ .......
0
WOE
CA
,ACA4- =
(040
caG <
N
CD
.
........... ...........
.
........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... ...........
07 00
O
R.
(0
(2.
0
0
(n
0 cn
0
0 ::3
cc
0) CD
3
CD
.: ............ : ........... : ...... ........ * — * — * '': ........ ........... : ........ ! .... 1-0-
............ : ........... ........... ; ........... : ..................... ; ........... I ........... : ........... z ...........
............ : ........... ! .......... ...... - * -:- ........ : ........... ! ...... * .... ........... : ........... ........... ! .... IqO
rt
=r
0
CA
ca
CD
a-
0
CD
CD
0
CA
C
C
O
APPENDIX 6
2011 CPE Wiggins Pass Seismic Data (Digital Copy Only)
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
COLLIER COUNTY
COLLIER COUNTY DIVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES
Coastal Zone Management
3299 Tamiami Trail East * Suite 103
Naples, Florida 34112
(239)- 252 -2966 * FAX 239 - 252 -2950
CAC - Wiggins Pass Subcommittee
Gail Hambright, Accountant
December 13, 2011
2012 CAC - Wiggins Pass Subcommittee Scheduled Meetings
Please mark your calendar for the following 2012 CAC - Wiggins Pass Subcommittee scheduled
meeting dates. All meeting will be held the 3'd Monday of each month from 9 to 12 noon in the Risk
Management Training Room, 3311 Tamiami Trail East unless otherwise noticed:
January 17, 2012 (Monday January 16t" is a holiday, this meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday,
1/17/12) Meeting will he held in the Human Resource Conference Room (3303
Tanfiatni Trail East.
February 21, 2012 (Monday February 20"' is a holiday, this meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday,
2/21/]2)
March 19, 2012
April 16, 2012
May 21, 2012
June 18, 2012 Meeting v* ill be held in the Coast Zone Conference Room 103 - A (3299 J'amianti Trail
East)
July 16, 2012 Meeting i4 ill he held in the lluman Resource Conference Room (3303 1'arnianli "frail
East).
August 20, 2012 Meeting will be held in the Coast Zone Conference Room 103 -A (3299 'Uamianii 'frail
East)
September 17, 2012
October 15, 2012
November 19, 2012
December 17, 2012