Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Hacienda Lakes-BCC Review (PUDZ-2006-AR-10146)
AGENDA HACIENDA LAKES BCC REVIEW PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 WIT im DANTA INC. ENTRIX CONSUL "ZING tce AL t v v A. i Down to Earth. Down to Business:- Tindale- Oliver & PASSARELLA Associates, Inc. MULHERE & - - Planning and Engineering E�clogar ASSOCIATES ASSOCIATES (9 COLEMAN YOVANOVICH KOESTE RESEARCH C O N S U L T A N T S Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal BCC Review Materials APPLICATION Co,r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: ❑ AMENDMENT TO PUD (PUDA) ❑ PUD REZONE (PUDZ) Ej PUD TO PUD REZONE (PUDZ -A) PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT(S) HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC ADDRESS 3921 PROPECT AVENUE CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34104 TELEPHONE # CELL # 904 -762 -4454 FAX # E -MAIL ADDRESS: DAVID(C-OLSTARDEVELOPMENT.COM NAME OF AGENT DWIGHT NADEAU, RWA, INC ADDRESS 6610 WILLOW PARK DRIVE CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34109 TELEPHONE # 239 - 597 -0575 CELL # FAX # 239 - 597 -0578 E -MAIL ADDRESS: DHN __CONSULT- RWA.COM BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. Revised Nov2009 Coer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http:/ /www.colliergov .net /index.aspx ?page =774 NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP NAME OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION: MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP Revised Nov2009 CAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 Disclosure of Interest Information a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address I % of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address % of Ownership Collier CountyJunior Deputies League, Inc Wayne Arnold, President John R. Wood, Vice President William Poteet, Petra Jones, Victoria Freeman, Paul Lindabur Directors 100 % of Folio # 00418400409 Swamp Buggy Days 100% of Folio # 00417240000 Kim Charles Hornback, President Tom Cannon, Robert Swift, Randy Johns Chuck McMahon Members of the Board of Directors C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address I % of Ownership Revised Nov2009 Coer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 Revised Nov2009 Cor County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and /or limited partners. Name and Address % of Ownership Wilton Land Company, LLC George P. Bauer Revocable Trust - 99% Carol Bauer is the beneficiary of such trust 1 % Jennifer Toll is the beneficiary of such trust Carol B. Bauer Revocable Trust 1 % George Bauer is the beneficiary of such trust e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address % of Ownership Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Jennifer Toll 99% Duncan Toll Revocable Trust 1 % Jennifer Toll is the beneficiary of such trust Officers - David E. Torres, Manager & President Date of Contract: 01126110 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address Revised Nov2009 CAY COUnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 g. Date subject property acquired ® Wilton 01/26/10 Junior Deputy 12/27/95 Swamp Buggy Days 10/14/82 leased ❑ Term of lease yrs. /mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: 01 /26/10 Date option terminates: 01126/15, or Anticipated closing date 11 /15/2012 Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. PROPERTY LOCATION Detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page.) If request involves change to more than one zoning district, include separate legal description for property involved in each district. Applicant shall submit four (4) copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale) if required to do so at the pre - application meeting. NOTE: The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section /Township /Range 11, 12,13,14,23,24 & 25 / 50S / 26E Section /Township /Range 19 & 30/50S/27E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book Page #: Property I.D. #: 00417320001, 00436480003, 00433840002, 00413920007,00416680001, 00434560006, 00417240000, 00417520005, 00438000009, 00435000002, 00415160001, 00416640009, 00434080007, 00417640008, 00417080008 ,00438360600,00437440000, 00416520006 00416840003,00437360009, 00438401006, 00438160004 ,00467040001,00438360105, 00417200008, 00434120006, 00436880001, 00434600005, 00436960002 ,00417560007,00438360901, 00434160008, 00433400002, 00434800009, 00433360003, 00437000000 ,00417360003.00437800006, 00412560002,00416920004, 00436920000, 00434200007, 00414960008 ,00438361007,00414200001, 00434760000, 00459040006, 00437720005, 00414160002, 00438360804 ,00414280005,00434680009, 00417280002 00437160005 00418400409 00417800000 00418400506 00434720008 00414400005 00437640004, 00414640001 ,00418400205,00417600006, 00437320007 ,00417160009,00410800007, 00437960001, 00418400108, 00417480006 ,00436840009,00417440004 Revised Nov2009 Cor County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 Metes & Bounds Description: See attached legal description Size of property ft. X ft. = Total Sq. Ft. 98,538,672.80 Acres2262.14 Address/general location of subject property: The Project is located east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) near the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. PUD District (LDC 2.03.06) Revised Nov2009 ® Residential ® Community Facilities ® Commercial ® Industrial \r Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page). Section /Township /Range / _ Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book Page #: Property I.D. #: Metes & Bounds Description: REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from the A, Agriculture, A -ST (Special Treatment), and PUD zoning district(s) to the MPUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Undeveloped land, attraction (Swamp Buggy races) and passive recreation (Collier County Junior Deputies League Camp) Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Commercial, Attraction and Recreation uses Original PUD Name: Swamp Buggy Days Ordinance No.: 84 -26 Revised Nov2009 Zoning Land Use Undeveloped agriculture land and N A. Agriculture earthmine Undeveloped agriculture land, Winding Cypress PUD, Collier Regional Medical Ctr S A, Agriculture and PUD PUD Piscayne Strand State Forest, Undeveloped E A, Agriculture agricultural land. Undeveloped agricultural land, McMullen W A, Agriculture and PUD MPUD. First Assy, Mlnist. Edu, & Rehab PUD Does the owner of the subject property own property contiguous to the subject property? If so, give complete legal description of entire contiguous property. (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page). Section /Township /Range / _ Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book Page #: Property I.D. #: Metes & Bounds Description: REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from the A, Agriculture, A -ST (Special Treatment), and PUD zoning district(s) to the MPUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Undeveloped land, attraction (Swamp Buggy races) and passive recreation (Collier County Junior Deputies League Camp) Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Commercial, Attraction and Recreation uses Original PUD Name: Swamp Buggy Days Ordinance No.: 84 -26 Revised Nov2009 Co *er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria noted below. Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria noted below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.13) 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The proposed MPUD's consistency with the locational criteria set forth on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and supporting Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP), and consistency with the applicable Elements related to access, drainage water, sewer, and other utilities, combined with the development conditions and commitments contained in Exhibit F proposed MPUD document, gives reasonable assurance that all infrastructure will be developed consistent with County regulations. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The documents, including the Covenant of Unified Control, submitted with this Petition Application provide evidence of unified control. Further, the Land Development Code (LDC) requires appropriate provisions for continuing operation and maintenance of common areas. 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub - district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses /density, and fully explaining /addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub- district, policy or other provision.) Please refer to the Statement of Compliance attached to this application. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The MPUD Master Plan has been designed to optimize internal land use relationships through the use of various forms of open space separation. Additionally, most external relationships are automatically regulated by the LDC to ensure harmonious relationships between projects. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside by this proposed project meets or exceeds the provisions of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The timing and sequence of the permitting of the proposed development coincides with the programming of the County's proposed capital improvements to meet concurrency requirements. Adequate improvements, utilities and other facilities can be provided. Revised Nov2009 GAer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Ability, as applied in this context implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal system potable water supplies, characteristics of the property relative to hazards, and capacity of roads is supportive of conditions emanating from urban development. Relative to this Petition, development of the subject property is timely, because supporting infrastructure are available or will be in place by the time permitting of the proposed improvements is complete 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The development standards in the Exhibit B of the proposed MPUD Ordinance Exhibits are similar to those standards used for the residential structures and related improvements when compared to County regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions, however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ® No If so, what was the nature of that hearing? Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ® No If so, please provide copies. NOTICE: This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the Revised Nov2009 Cor County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 rezoning for a period of six (6) months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re- opened by submitting a new application, repayment of all application fees and granting of a determination of "sufficiency ". Further review of the project will be subject to the then current code. (LDC Section 10.03.05.0.) Revised Nov2009 Co *er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION NAME OF APPLICANT(S) HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC ADDRESS 12600 BISCAYNE COURT CITY NAPLES STATE FLORIDA ZIP 34105 TELEPHONE # CELL # 904 - 762 -4454 FAX # E -MAIL ADDRESS: DAVID _ FLSTARDEVELOPMENT.COMI ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (IF AVAILABLE): LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section /Township /Range 11, 12,13,14,23,24 & 25 / 50S / 26E Section /Township/Range 19 & 30/50S/27E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book Page #: Property I.D. #: 00417320001, 00436480003, 00433840002, 00413920007,00416680001, 00434560006, 00417240000, 00417520005, 00438000009, 00 35000002, 00415160001 00416640009, 00434080007, 00417640008, 00417080008 ,00438360600,00437440000, 00416520006 00416840003, 00437360009, 00438401006, 00438160004 ,00467040001,00438360105, 00417200008 00434120006,00436880001, 00434600005, 00436960002 ,00417560007,00438360901, 00434160008, 00433400002, 00434800009, 00433360003, 00437000000 ,00417360003.00437800006, 00412560002 ,00416920004,00436920000, 00434200007, 00414960008 ,00438361007,00414200001, 00434760000 00459040006 ,00437720005,00414160002, 00438360804 ,00414280005,00434680009, 00417280002 00437160005 00418400409 00417800000 00418400506 00434720008 00414400005 00437640004,00414640001, 00418400205, 00417600006, 00437320007 ,00417160009,00410800007, 00437960001,00418400108, 00417480006 ,00436840009,00417440004 Metes & Bounds Description: See attached legal description TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED (Check applicable system): Revised Nov2009 Co)�e-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM a. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ b. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ PROVIDE NAME THIS PROJECT WILL UTILIZE COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM, THIS APPLICATION IS LOCKED AND DOES NOT HAVE A CHECKBOX FOR COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM NEXT TO THE HEADING ABOVE. c. PACKAGE TREATMENT PLANT ❑ (GPD capacity) d. SEPTIC SYSTEM ❑ TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a. COUNTY UTILITY SYSTEM b. CITY UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ c. FRANCHISED UTILITY SYSTEM ❑ PROVIDE NAME d. PRIVATE SYSTEM (WELL) ❑ TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED: 327,500 s.f commercial + 70,000 s.f. office + 140,000 s.f. business park + 135 hotel rooms + school for up to 919 students + 3,520 Residents (1760 du x 2 people /du) PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS: A. WATER -PEAK 1,023,024 gpd AVERAGE DAILY 682,016 gpd B. SEWER -PEAK 566,300 gpd AVERAGE DAILY 435,616 gpd IF PROPOSING TO BE CONNECTED TO COLLIER COUNTY REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM, PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATE SERVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE REQUIRED YEAR 2012 NARRATIVE STATEMENT: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT: If the project is located within the services boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, written notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate to Collier County Utilities the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the at time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain shall contain an agreement to Revised Nov2009 C0 *8Y County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. STATEMENT OF AVAILABILITY CAPACITY FROM OTHER PROVIDERS: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre - application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating that there is adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. Revised Nov2009 CAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE DEPT. OF ZONING & LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET (239) 252 -2400 FAX (239) 643 -6968 PUD AMENDMENT (PUDA) - PUD REZONE (PUDZ) - PUD to PUD REZONE (PUDZ -A) APPLICATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST THIS COMPLETED CHECKLIST IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION PACKET IN THE EXACT ORDER LISTED BELOW W /COVER SHEETS ATTACHED TO EACH SECTION. NOTE: INCOMPLETE SUMBITTALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRE STANDARD REQUIREMENTS: 1 Additional set if located in the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area) Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessary 24 ® ❑ Completed Application with list of Permitted Uses; Development Standards Table; List of proposed deviations from the LDC (if any); List of Developer Commitments and Statement of Compliance narrative (download application from web for current form) 24 ® ❑ Pre - application meeting notes 24 ❑ ❑ PUD Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36" and One 8 1/2" x 1 1 " copy 24 ❑ ❑ Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36 "and One 8 1/2" x 1 1 " copy 24 ❑ ❑ Original PUD doc ord and Master Plan 24" x 36" — ONLY IF AMENDING THE PUD 24 ❑ ❑ Revised PUD application with changes crossed thru & underlined 24 ❑ ❑ Revised PUD application w amended Title page w ord #'s, LDC 10.02.1 3.A.2 24 ❑ ❑ Justification /Rationale for the Deviations (must be on a separate sheet within the application material; please DO NOT include it in the PUD documents) 24 ® ❑ Copies of the following: Deeds /Legal's & Survey (if boundary of original PUD is amended) 3 ® ❑ List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 ® ❑ Owner /Affidavit signed & notarized 2 ® ❑ Covenant of Unified Control 2 ❑ ❑ Completed Addressing checklist 2 ® ❑ Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and digital /electronic copy of EIS or exemption justification 4 ® ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 4 ® ❑ Utility Provisions Statement w /sketches 4 ® ❑ Architectural rendering of proposed structures 4 ❑ ❑ Survey, signed & sealed 4 ® ❑ Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) with applicable fees. For TIS guidelines & procedures refer to http: / /www.colliergov .net /Index.aspx` ?page -566 7 ❑ ❑ Recent Aerial Photograph (with habitat areas defined) min scaled 1 " =400' 5 ® ❑ Electronic copy of all documents in Word format and plans (CDRom or Diskette) I ® ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and /or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ ❑ If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Applicant must contact Mr. Gerry J. Lacavera, State of Florida Division of Forestry Q@ 239 -690 -3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan ", LDC Section 2.03.08.A.2.a.(b)i.c. Applicant /Agent Signature Revised Nov2009 Date Hacienda La�Ccs Of Naplilf'15 March 17, 2010 George P. Bauer Manager Wilton Land Company, LLC 206 Dudley Rd Wilton, CT 06897 Re: Wilton land Company lands in Collier County subject to option to purchase by Hacienda Lakes of Naples Dear Mr. Bauer: As you are aware, pursuant to the option agreement between Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Hacienda ") and Wilton Land Company, LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Wilton "), Hacienda has been authorized to pursue governmental approvals necessary to develop the lands owned by Wilton in Collier County. The purpose of this letter is to request that Wilton, owner of the lands described in the attached legal description, confirm that it has authorized Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC represented by David E. Torres as Manager, to pursue all permitting matters associated with the subject property and any related applications. Please execute below to confirm the above noted authorization. Sincer y David Manager, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Agreed to: George . Bauer, Manager Wilton Land Company, LLC. State of a County of �k ( e— George P. Bauer, Manager of Wilton land Company, LLC, being subscribed and sworn to before me �thi(s_ dayof M,.{�'rc'.��20110, Notary Public Notary Public �� State of My commission Expires: JA NOTARY UBLIC A� Idy COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR. K 2011: 66 I o Willow rark pr., 2 "d rloor I Napies, rL 341 o9 I Tel: 877- 357-8271 i rax: 877 - 357 -.5271 AFFIDA VIT 1 David Torres, (Manager of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC) being first duly sworn, depose and say that Wilton Land Company, LL C is the owner of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. We /I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated, or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner 1 further authorize RWA Inc. Mulhere & Associates Coleman Yovanox22h& Koester, P.A to gt a� my representative in any matters regarding this nA-vi b C', �I�5 T ed or Printed Name of Owner t Yp (,, Lei- I Signature of Property Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner ��les The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �Iday of 2011, by who is personally known to me or has produced identification. ANNA VICTORIA ROSA MY COMMISSION 0 EE 000221 W. , EXPIRES: October 13, 2014 Bonded Ttuu Notary Public UnderwrAers State of Florida Counry of Collier .�y (Signature of Notary Public - State of Florida) Notary Stamp: AFFIDA VIT I D. Wayne Arnold (President of Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc.) being first duly sworn, depose and say that Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc is the owner of a portion of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of' the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest information, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. WeII understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated, or County printed .shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been .submitted. As property owner l ,further authorize RWA Inc. Mulhere & Associates Coleman Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., and Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. to act as my representative in any matters regarding this Petition. I Signature of Property Owner D. Wayne Arnold, President Typed or Printed Name of Owner Signature of Property Owner Typed or Printed Name of Owner The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 18th day of January, 2011, by D. Wayne Arnold who is personally known to me or has predueed a� is Mnhfieafien. r,r 1 State of Florida (Signature of Notary Public - State of Florida) County of Lee Notary Stamp: sJy�ss SHARON UMPENHOUR :.; :,: MY COMMISSION # DD 939534 j . � , EXPIRES:Oemmber4,2013 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters �01 AFFIDAVIT STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared KIM CHARLES HORNBACH, who, being first duly sworn by me, deposes and states that: Swamp Buggy Inc is the owner of a portion of the property described herein and which is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all the answers to the questions in this application, including the disclosure of interest it ?formation, all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the best of our knowledge and belief. I understand that the information requested on this application must be complete and accurate and that the content of this form, whether computer generated, or County printed shall not be altered. Public hearings will not be advertised until this application is deemed complete, and all required information has been submitted. As property owner, Swamp Buggy, Inc., further authorizes RWA, Inc.. Where & Associates and Coleman Yovanovich and Koester to act as its representative in any Qmatters regarding this Petition. SWAMP BUGGY, LNC. By: s Kim Charles Hornbach As Its: President SWORN TO (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this day of January, 2011, by KIM CHARLES HORABACH, as President of Swamp Buggy, Inc., who is personally knov-n to rne. DIANLAPNI M Ej�, MY GAMMIS 84157BMW ThrU Nnnde," Sera of Notary Pub lic - State of Florida) Notary Stamp: INSTR 4393149 OR 4536 PG 732 RECORDED 2/9/2010 11:28 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DOC @.70 $0.70 REC 518.50 CONS 50.00 This Instrument Prepared By: Harold J. Webre, Esquire HAROLD J. WEBRE, P.A. 1804 S. Florida Avenue Lakeland, FL 33803 QUIT CLAIM DEED Exhibit D Copy of Deed BY THIS QUIT CLAIM DEED, dated this -,2 Z day of January, 2010, GEORGE P. BAUER ( "Grantor "), for and in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 U.S. Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, hereby remises, releases and quitclaims all of Grantors' right, title, interest, claim and demand in the following described real property located in Collier County, Florida to WILTON LAND COMPANY, LLC, a Florlcia-litniterl lability company ( "Grantee"), whose post office address is 206 D"51" Ngita1 �T�Q6997: The Southeast Quartej (S)V114) of the Northeast Quarter 0j 1 /4) V, e—t— an 1 Collier Connty, Florkda -; a `" Parcel *THE SUBJECTPROPi; - IS NOT THE GRANTOR IN WITNESS W Q;f�rtts►tt Deed the day and year first abone�lrttJer Signed, sealed and delivered in our pures ence: &�, /--� a,—,, Witness 1 — Signature . Witness 1 - Printed Name Witness 2 — Signature Wit ess P;; n ed Nam Northi e f Quarter (NW 114) of the 1,.gIivuship S�South, Range 26 East, 701 r ,STEAD PIt0 ERTY OF 17" J0 ��j and delivered this Quit Claim George P. 96tier * ** OR 4536 PG 733 * ** STATE OF CONNECTICUT `{ COUNTY OF tit The foregoing Quit Claim Deed was acknowledged before me on this oL day of January, 2010, by George P. Bauer, who l is personally known to me or produced as identification. (SEAL) otary ublic — Signature }-D olm�y Public - Printed Name / �Iv < 2 commission Expires January 31, 2014 INSTR 4388118 OR 4531 PG 2872 RECORDED 1/26/2010 4:17 PM PAGES 9 DWIGHT E. BROCK, COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DOC @.70 $210,000.00 REC $78.00 INDX $4.00 CONS $30,000,000.00 Exhibit D Copy of Deed o�� • i IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION SEMBLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP #42, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership and TOLL - RATTLESNAKE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company Plaintiffs, VS. TOLL FL VII LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited partnership, TOLL BROS., INC., a Pennsylvania corporation'JO i II LLC, a Florida limited liabili "woA ` VISION & FAITH, INC., a Florl lirporatioi GEORGE P. BAUER, and MlbWA�EL A. TAYLOR, GEORGE P. BAUER and a Florida corporation, VS. Case No. 08- 2136- CA -HDH QUA rte, ow & FAITH, INC .0 Counter - claimants, `<-�l T C1 TOLL - RATTLESNAKE, LLC, a Florida limited, liability company, SEMBLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP #42, LTD., a Florida limited partnership and TOLLS FL 11, LLC, a Florida limited liability company,�� 4� *Gbc, Counter - defendants. " CERTIFICATE OF TITLE ~' 1, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk and Comptroller of the above - entitled Court, do hereby certify that I executed and filed a Certificate of Sale in this action on 2010, for the real property described herein, and that no objections OR 4531 PG 2873 0 0 to the sale have been filed within the time allowed for filing objections. The real property as described in Exhibit °A" which is attached hereto and made a part hereof was sold to: Wilton Land Company, LLC 206 Dudley Road Wilton, CT 06897 WITNESS my hand and seal on this Court, on _�I n v a r X2.4 e 2010. D 1G i ROCK, Clerk & Cpmptroller:, t�l �e ciL_ti l if ty-GI rk 1 / V �� v �e f � '�� � �, ice:• �'' (, J 1D Copies furnished to: ! 1�� -Louis D. D'Agosti o, Esq. `` J Samuel J. Heller, Esq. JIra William Spivey, If 9463. 14311 #436` ^i t E OR 4531 PG 2874 F- IL EXHIBIT "A" E PARCEL 1: THE S 1/2 OF THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET. PARCEL 2: THE E 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 3: THE SW 114 OF THE SW 114 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 4: THE S 1/2 OF THE SW 114 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA co . PARCELS: v -.� THEW 112 OF THE NE 114 OF TH V1G 4 FF SECTION 13, O SHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR {DA` PARCEL 6: f~��,-�� �, THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 114 q SFT 3'01(VI�tSIR 59 °SO ;H, NGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. I V I I I} I ��iiu ) � V/ PARCEL T � �-' , � ` "- A'-� i w THE NW 114 OF THE SW 114 O Pr TION 13, TOWNSRIP,, 50 �OU, NGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. it ;r y f� PARCEL & � >/ THE S 112 OF THE NW 114 OF THE S ,F THE.'% t-•tgiE SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDN- PARCEL9: THE N 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL10: THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 11: THE W 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 12: THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET. PARCEL 13: THE N 112 OF THE S 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 114, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET. OR 4531 PG 2875 0 0 PARCEL 16: THE E 112 OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 17: THE SW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 114, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 1 S: THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 19: THE NE 114 OF THE NW 1/4, SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 20: THE S 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 114 OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 21: cf�IA THE NW 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 OFJfH i Clef; COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ; 14-, PARCEL 22: / `(( ' THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 114 O; T E 1/�} OF I EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FL4f 6kL-/J'`. -'�•' PARCEL 23: , THE N 112 OF THE SE 114 OF TN 014 OF SECTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. w�} PARCEL 24: 1 THE E 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 114 O�ESI' RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 4,'iNS,HI k. Ii r� 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, 4-OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, PARCEL 26: THEW 112 OF SW 114 OF NE 114 OF SE 1/4 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 27: THE E 112 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 28: ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST 114 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE ALONG THE EAST AND WEST 114 SECTION LINE, NORTH 87 °33'46" EAST 2673.55 FEET TO THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 14 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH AND SOUTH 1/4 SECTION LINE NORTH 00 050'21" EAST 1341.85 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 87 °30'50" EAST 1336.55 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OR 4531 PG 2876 u OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 00 °49'36" WEST 1342.78 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST AND WEST 114 SECTION LINE; THENCE LEAVING SAID LINE SOUTH 89 °44'17" WEST 134.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04 042'13" EAST 210.85 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43 °12'04" WEST 178.18 FEET; THENCE NORTH 71 °31'36" WEST 145.23 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77 °18'36' WEST 175.92 FEET; THENCE NORTH 63 027'15" WEST 288.67 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 53 °31'25" WEST 74.43 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41 657'31" WEST 65.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 16 °01'06" WEST 8D.79 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 11 °26'01" EAST 73.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 41 °05'47" EAST 146.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 21 °16'17" EAST 88.09 FEET; THENCE SOUTH D7 051'12" EAST 154.74 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 °46'36" WEST 794.98 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 046'05" EAST 94.58 F f THENCE NORTH 87 022'18" EAST 3427 ---:_Q THENCE NORTH 59013'22 EAST THENCE NORTH 69 °05'26 EAST i FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82 °53'39" EAS 10 — FE —E-TTO THE EAST L$ E O NORTHWEST 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 C SAID SEC ION 14f� —� , _ \1 ' THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUT ` 0 °4 '3 E 2;z 4�. THENCE LEAVING SAID LINENO, 8 ' 9 1111E ij7:�;r THENCE SOUTH 69 °05'26" WEST 1 .64 EffT, \a THENCE SOUTH 59 °13'22" ST THENCE SOUTH 87 °22'22" VV 39.63 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45°46'02" WE S ` 9.76 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 68 °50'21" WES7%"el 24 FEET; ��.? THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 129. `F T ALONG THE ARC 143ON— TANGENTIAL CIRCULAR CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH -MI A RADIUS 1'10.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 67 °1347" AND 6 I�!u�CHORD WHICH BEARS SOUTH 35 °13'27" WEST 121.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 °36'34° WEST 779.16 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 87 039'37" WEST 74.85 FEET TO THE POINT ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH 114 SECTION LINE; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE NORTH 00 050'21" EAST 2683.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 29: THE N 1/2 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET AND LESS THE NORTH 3D FEET. PARCEL 30: THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE WEST 100 FEET. ALSO LESS THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3241, PAGE 3460, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 31: THE NE 114 OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 3241, PAGE 3460, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 32: OR 4531 PG 2877 0 0 THE NE 114 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 33: THE NE 1/4 OF THE NE 114 OF THE NW 114 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 34: THE E 112 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NE 1/4, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 35: THE W 1/2 OF THE NW 114 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 36: THE SW 114 OF THE NE 114, SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ;'C`• PARCEL 37:�';/�f ..'�`� THE S 1/2 OF THE NW 114 OF S 1 710�t`23, TOWNSHIP 50 SbIf;TH,�RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE }NEST 140 FEEtiT. ALSO LESS THAT PORTION DESO [Sq iNi I OR iS BOOK 2192, PAGE 2057, AND LESS THAT PORTION DESC IBE IN O C!A RE �RD. 824 ,PAGE 3460, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER CO U TY' F bRI6A j � ��=-� r ( ti t r 1 PARCEL 38: THE NW 1/4 OF THE SE 114 OFT NE 1/4 OF SECTIOOWSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLO i PARCEL 39: THEN 1/2 OF THE S 112 OF THE SE 1 QES,NI'$ TiON 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORiF}A= -- PARCEL40: THE NE 114 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 41: THE S 1/2 OF THE S 112 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 42: THE S 1/2 OF THE N 112 OF THE E 112 OF THE NW 114 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 43: THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE NW 114 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 44: THE NW 114 OF THE NW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL45: OR 4531 PG 2878 0 0 THE SE 114 OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 46: THE E 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL47: THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND THE W 112 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NE 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 46: THE SW 114 OF THE SE 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL49: THEN 112 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NFF}W4 -OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, O�I��r PARCEL 50: �CJ� �,,�, 112 OF THE SE 114 OF E 11 f14 E SW 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, THE S Fj � t � -T� RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNT/Y, FtGRID1A7 ` -1 1 �� PARCEL 51: N I THE S 112 OF THE NE 114 OF �HEI 114 T E Ij RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER CQ'o PARCEL 52:' THE W 112 OF THE NE 114 OF T 1/4 OF THE SW RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COU �. ' 1 IDA. PARCEL 53: THE N 112 OF THE NE 114 OF THE SE 114 RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, C4 SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, PARCEL 54: THE NE 114 OF THE NE 114 AND THE N 112 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 114, SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNT(, FLORIDA. PARCEL 55: THE NE 114 OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 56: THE SW 114 OF THE NW 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 57: THE EAST 112 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE SE 114 OF THE SW 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 58: THE W 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. OR 4531 PG 2879 0 0 PARCEL 59: THE E 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SE 114 OF THE SW 1/4 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 60: THAT PART OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; RUN N 00 *13'20" E, 2722.27 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE N 89 016'34" W 1822.92 FEET; THENCE N 00 °33'02" W 1130.79 FEET; THENCE S 88 °56'47" W 1582.03 FEET; THENCE N 03 618'24" W 1451.30 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S 87006'54"W 1919.74 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S 00 °13'07" E 2636.89 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S 00 013'07" E 2636.89 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE N 89 °12'25" E 2693.13 FEET TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE N 89 °12'25" E 2693.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.^ `t TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT O RECORDS BOOK 759, PAGE 169 F ;, I PARCEL 61: THE SW 114 OF SECTION 19, TO WNM FLORIDA. 1 PARCEL 62: THE S 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOI�i" LESS AND EXCEPT. THE WEST 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27, ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: 9JWAY PUR'SNAl jT`j'O DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS OF Cbk6E'i,COUNTY, FLORIDA. 50 l7C�1T .BA �E.27. ST'�COLLIER COUNTY, 50 SOUTH, RAGE 271 El# ,j OLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ! OF THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION FLORIDA. THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SW 114 OF THE NW 114 OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SW 114 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: THE WEST 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: THE EAST 112 OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE SW 114 OF THE EAST 112 OF THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: * ** OR 4531 PG 2880 * ** 0 0 THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SE 114 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: THE WEST 112 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE WEST 112 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NE 114 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: THE EAST 112 OF THE SE 114 OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAR FR E-QUN`Tl', FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: co THE E 1/2 OF THE SE 114 OFT -E HE EAST 1/2 OP'THEl` OUTH 112 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANG 27 A�- S�QLLIER COUNTY, FLORID . ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: THE EAST 112 OF THE NE 1/4'107, Tfif -11,4.C)Fw �1i JOE', 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RPA16G 27 EAST, COLLIER ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT: THE WEST 112 OF THE NE 114 OF H�E`il�F THE 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 2 S JG 9 SOUTH 1/2 OF SECTION F THE SOUTH 112 OF SECTION FLORIDA. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal BCC Review Materials ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION Electronic Articles of Organization L09000067527 Cl FILED 8:00 AM For July 14 2009 Florida Limited Liability Company Sec. Of State ncausseaux Article I The name of the Limited Liability Company is: HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC Article II The street address of the principal office of the Limited Liability Company is: 220 DUDLEY ROAD WILTON, CT. US 06897 The mailing address of the Limited Liability Company is: 220 DUDLEY ROAD WILTON, CT. US 06897 Article III The purpose for which this Limited Liability Company is organized is: ANY AND ALL LAWFUL BUSINESS. k Article IV The name and Florida street address of the registered agent is: HAROLD J. WEBRE, P.A. 1804 S. FLORIDA AVENUE LAKELAND, FL. 33803 Having been named as registered agent and to accept service of process for the above stated limited liability company at the place designated in this certificate, I hereby accept the appointment as registered agent and agree to act in this capacity. I fizrther agree to comply with the provisions of all statutes relating to the proper and complete performance of my duties, and I am familiar with and accept the obligations of my position as registered agent. Registered Agent Signature: HAROLD J. WEBRE, PRESIDENT Article V The name and address of managing members /managers are: Title: MGR DUNCAN TOLL 220 DUDLEY ROAD WILTON, CT. 06897 US Title: MGR JENNIFER TOLL 220 DUDLEY ROAD WILTON, CT. 06897 US Title: MGR DAVID TORRES 12600 BISCAYNE COURT NAPLES, FL. 34105 US Signature of member or an authorized representative of a member Signature: DUNCAN TOLL E C7 L09000067527 FILED 8:00 AM July 14 2009 Sec. Of State neausseaux COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that they are the property owner of record of property commonly known as Wilton Land Company, LLC Folio #'s contained in "Exhibit A" and legally described irr Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Rezoning. We hereby designate David E. Torres, Manager of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, the legal representatives of the property and as such, this individual is authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved Rezoning including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the Rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the Rezoning, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the Rezoning process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the Rezoning approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the Rezoning must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the Rezoning and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions, and safeguards of the Rezoning. Signed: ., / Date: 'George P. B er Manager Wilton Land Company, LLC J i i — � c (L) \ STATE OF COUNTY OF Sworn tp and subscribed before me this day of��- .2010. Marry Pub ic) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: SSion EXQN9S 31,2014 CHOOS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced \ 3b2r� =G' l7�>` as identification and did take an Oath did not take an Oath C.\i i-e.m ravid v Silvana\Tlnrnmentc \Harienda 1 Ams\ A uthnri7atinn Inters \ ?ni n- 111 -13 Covenant of unified mntrnl dnr. Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal BCC Review Materials UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT I, David E. Torres, Manager of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC being first duly sworn, depose and say that Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC agrees to dedicate to Collier County Utilities, the water distribution, and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time. Additionally, Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC or successor developer, agree that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. Finally, and if applicable, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC. or successor developer, agrees to dedicate the appropriate utility easements or serving the water and sewer systems. David E. TorrR§ J Manager Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this H day of 2010, by David E. Torres CHOOS = ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced as identification and did take an Oath did not take an Oath By: (Notary Public) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ANNA ROSA MY COMMISSION 9 DD 599004 P' EXPIRES: WOW 13, 2010 F Bonded ihru Notary P*k und"r®ers TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I hereby authorize LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION (Name of Agent – typed or printed) To serve as my re�tt nd,he Collie r County Growth Management Plan affecting the property identif dint App �j Signed: Date: / 2- 2--/1 D David torr , M —� Hacien Naples, LLC. I hereby certify th ve t ea I to mak the foregoing application, and that the application is true, correct and co lete to t knowl e. 31z- z -Jl b Signed: \ Date: David Torres, fiager Hacienda La esll LC. STATE OF (Florida) COUNTY OF (Collier) Sworn to and subscribed before me this day of "`" , 2010. By: DD 599004 (Notary Public) MY COMMISSI ES; 2Q4,, a . %bk underwraers CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: who is personally known to me, who has produced and did take an Oath did not take an Oath NOTICE — BE AWARE THAT: as identification Florida Statute Section 837.06 – False Official Statements Law states that: "Whoever knowingly makes a false statement in writing with the intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official duty shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by a fine to a maximum of $500.00 and /or maximum of a sixty day jail term." Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERM001 General Consultation \000A - Subtask 1.1 General Consultation - Plannina',Legal Documents \2010 -01 -13 Agent Itr of authorization.doc ORDINANCE NO. 11- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004 -41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE AGRICULTURAL (A) AGRICULTURAL- SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY (A -ST) AND PUD ZONING DISTRICT (SWAMP BUGGY DAYS PUD) TO THE MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS THE HACIENDA LAKES MPUD THAT WILL ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS RETAIL COMMERCIAL FLOOR AREA; 70,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE SPACE INCLUDING A CONVERSION OF RETAIL USE TO PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE; . 135 HOTEL ROOMS INCLUDING A CONVERSION TO BUSINESS PARK; 140,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK OR EDUCATION FACILITY; A PUBLIC SCHOOL; CONTINUATION OF EXISTING "SWAMP BUGGY" ATTRACTION AND "JUNIOR DEPUTY" PASSIVE RECREATION; AND A MAXIMUM OF 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS INCLUDING CONVERSIONS TO RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK AND SENIOR HOUSING FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED LIVING AND NURSING CARE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONSISTING OF 2,262 +/- ACRES IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (C.R. 951) AT THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND RATTLESNAKE- HAMMOCK ROAD AND NORTH AND SOUTH OF SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTIONS 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 AND 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND SECTIONS 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 84 -26 FOR SWAMP BUGGY GROUNDS; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Dwight Nadeau of RWA, Inc., Robert Mulhere of Mulhere and Associates and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A,, representing Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Pagel of 3 Rev, 9115/11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from the Agricultural (A), Agricultural- Special Treatment Overlay (A -ST) and PUD zoning district (Swamp Buggy Days PUD) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the 2,262 +/- acre project to be known as the hacienda Lakes MPUD, to allow a maximum of 327,500 square feet of gross retail commercial floor area; 70,000 gross square feet of professional and medical office space; 135 hotel rooms; 140,000 gross square feet of business park or education facility; continuation of existing '*swamp buggy" attraction and "Junior Deputy" passive recreation; and a maximum of 1,760 residential dwelling units in accordance with the Hacienda Lakes MPUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" through "G" and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004 -41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is /are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Ordinance No. 84 -26, the Swamp Buggy PUD, is hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super - majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2011 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Page 2 of 3 Rev. 9/15/11 FRED W. COYLE, Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: �\ � 0 Heidi Ashton -Cicko Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A — Permitted Uses Exhibit B — Development Standards Exhibit C — Master Plan Exhibit D -- Legal Description Exhibit E - List of Requested Deviations Exhibit P - List of Owner Commitments Exhibit G — Master Use and Conversion List CPS 10 -CPS -0 1024 \97 Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Page 3 of 3 Rev. 9/15/11 EXHIBIT A PERMITTED USES PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT TYPE UNITS. ACREAGE+ TRACT "R" RESIDENTIAL 1,714 447.86 TRACT "R/MU" RESIDENTIAL /MEDICAL USE 25 min.* 38.82 TRACT `BP" BUSINESS PARK 1 35.38 TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL 17 min.* 34.16 TRACT "A" ATTRACTION 1 47,27 TRACT "P" PRESERVE 0 1,544.14 TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY 0 1.33 TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY 2 21.62 TRACT "ROW" PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY 0 72.01 TRACT "S" SCHOOL 0 19.55 Total 1,760 2262.14 *: Denotes the minimum number of dwelling units that must be constructed in the associated land use tract. Given that Tract C may generate up to 55 residential dwelling units, thirty (30 %) percent of those residential units (17 units) must be constructed in Tract C. Tract R/MU is required by this document to have no less than 25 residential dwelling units constructed within that Tract. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one -third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. GENERAL PERMITTED LAND USES Streets, alleys, water management facilities and structures, utilities and other infrastructure improvements are generally permitted anywhere within this MPUD except for in the P, Preserve Tract. ll TRACT "R ", RESIDENTIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi - family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi - family, as defined in the LDC. Residential units may be converted to senior housing units or recreational vehicle (RV) units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; 3. Two - family and duplex dwellings; 4. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 1 of 51 S. Multi- family dwellings; 6. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD; 7. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the BZA, by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; 2. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing, apartment rental, as well as resale and rental of units within the MPUD in perpetuity (group 6531); Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; Horse stables and related equestrian facilities to serve the PUD that complement the MPUD's proximity to the Picayune Strand State Forest may be allowed on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway, subject to applicable permitting. This private, non - commercial, accessory use is intended for stabling for residents of the PUD. Horse racing, dressage, or horse jumping events open to the public are prohibited; Private stables on single - family lots greater than 43,560 square feet in lot area, on residential lands lying east of the proposed north/south public roadway are permitted to allow one horse for each 21,780 square feet of lot area; Horse trails. III TRACT "RV ": Up to 290 RV units are allowed only if residential units are converted to RV in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent —Rev. 09/15/11 Page 2 of 51 A. Principal Uses: 1. Recreational vehicle parks (Group 7033, recreational vehicle parks only), subject to the criteria contained in Exhibit B, and only in the location depicted on Exhibit C. In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. Except as provided herein, the RV District shall comply with the Land Development Code (LDC) including Sections 2.03.03.F and 5.5.10. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD, including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests; IV TRACT "RIMU" RESIDENTIAL/MEDICAL USE PERMITTED USES: Up to 1,760 residential units consisting of single family units and multi - family units are permitted in the entire PUD. No more than 1,232 units in the entire PUD shall be multi - family as defined in the LDC. The residential units may be converted to senior housing units, where permitted, in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Upon conversion, the residential units shall be reduced according to the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. Up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office related land uses are also allowed in this tract, less up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical related office land uses approved by plat or SDP in Tract C. Developer and County shall each maintain a master list of converted uses for this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or uses, or and used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Single family detached dwellings; 2. Zero lot line, detached dwellings; Two- family and duplex dwellings; Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); Multi- family dwellings; Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent living facilities, assisted living facilities, skilled nursing facilities, and continuing care retirement communities. Senior housing facilities shall not be considered residential land uses Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 3 of 51 for the purposes of density, but shall be derived from conversion from residential units in accordance with the Land Use Conversion Factors in Exhibit B. These land uses shall be developed in accordance the development standards set forth in Table II of Exhibit B In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. 7. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912). If this retail use is developed in the R/MU Tract then the square footage of gross floor area of this retail use shall reduce the square footage of gross floor area of retail uses permitted in Tract C.; 8. Health Services, (Groups 8011 -8049, 8071 -8072, 8082, and 8092 - 8099); 9. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ( "BZA ") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this land use tract, including swimming pools, spas, docks, boat houses, and screen enclosures, recreational facilities designed to serve the development; Model homes and model home centers including offices for project administration, construction, sales and marketing; Recreational facilities and structures to serve the PUD including clubhouses, health and fitness facilities, pools, meeting rooms, community buildings, boardwalks, playgrounds, playfields, tennis courts, and similar uses intended to exclusively serve the residents of the PUD and their guests. V TRACT "BP" BUSINESS PARK PERMITTED USES: Up to 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and a hotel of up to 135 rooms capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. However, if owner elects not to build a hotel on Tract C or BP, then the square footage limitation of business park land uses could be exceeded if a hotel conversion to business park of up to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area is used based on the land use conversions in Exhibit B. In place of the business park and hotel land uses, a school may be developed. If a hotel is constructed on Tract C or BP, based on an approved plat or SDP, then the hotel conversion shall terminate. Tract `BP" is located directly north of the Attraction Tract that accommodates the Swamp Buggy land uses and facilities. This acreage is meant to provide for a transition from the Attraction land uses to the Residential Tract and intended land uses further north. This Tract shall be permitted to be developed for either a business park or a school. If the Tract is developed as a school, only those uses permitted in Section XI below shall be allowed. Should the 35.38 acre tract be proposed for development as a business park, no building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: Apparel and other finished products (groups 2311- 2399); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 4 of 51 2. Building construction (groups 1521- 1542); 3. Business services (group 7311); 4. Communications (groups 4812 -4899, including communication towers limited in height to 100 feet); 5. Construction: Special trade contractors (groups 1711-1799); 6. Depository and non - depository institutions (groups 6081, 6082); 7. Drugs and medicines (groups 2833 - 2836); 8. Eating places (group 5812, not including fast foods, walk -up windows and drive - thru restaurants); 9. Educational services (groups 8221 - 8299); 10. Electronics and other electrical equipment manufacturing, indoor only (groups 3612- 3699); 11. Engineering, accounting, research, management, and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 12. Food manufacturing (groups 2034, 2038, 2053, 2064, 2066, 2068, 2096, 2098, 2099); 13. Furniture and fixtures manufacturing (groups 2511- 2599); 14. Government offices/buildings (groups 9111 -9222, 9224 -9229, 9311, 9411 -9451, 9511 - 9532, 9611- 9661); 15. Health services (groups 8011- 8049); 16. Industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment (groups 3524, 3546, 3571 - 3579); 17. Industrial inorganic chemicals (groups 2833, and 2844); 18. Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (group 8331); 19. Leather and leather products (groups 3131-3199); 20. Measuring, analyzing, and controlling instruments; photographic, medical and optical goods; watches and clocks manufacturing (groups 3812 - 3873); 21. Medical laboratories and research and rehabilitative centers (groups 8071, 8072, 8092, 8093); 22. Miscellaneous manufacturing industries (groups 3911 - 3999); 23. Motion picture production (groups 7812 - 7819); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 5 of 51 24. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225, mini- and self- storage warehousing only), subject to the following criteria: i. The use of metal roll -up garage doors located on the exterior of the perimeter buildings and walls of buildings which are visible from a public right -of -way is prohibited; and ii. Access to individual units whether direct or non - direct must be from the side of the building that is oriented internally; iii. No building shall exceed 100 feet in length when adjacent to a residential tract within the MPUD; iv. No outdoor storage of any kind is permitted, and v. Storage units shall be utilized for storage purposes only. 25. Printing, publishing and allied industries (groups 2711- 2796); 26. Rubber and miscellaneous plastic products (groups 3021, 3052, 3053); 27. Security /commodity brokers (group 6211); 28. Transportation equipment (groups 3714, 3716, 3732, 3751, 3792, 3799); 29. U.S. Postal Service (group 4311); 30. Wholesale trade durable goods (groups 5021, 5031, 5043 -5049, 5063 -5078, 5091, 5092, 5094 - 5099); 31. Wholesale trade non durable goods (5111 -5153, 5181, 5182, 5191, except that wholesale distribution of chemicals, fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides shall be a minimum of 500 feet from a residential tract within the MPUD, 5192 - 5193); 32. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Limited Principal Uses: The following uses shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the total acreage of the Business Park tract: 1. Business services (7312, 7313, 7319, 7331, 7334 -7336, 7342, 7349, 7352, 7361, no labor pools, 7371 -7384, 7389); 2, Child day care services (group 8351); 3. Depository and non- depository institutions (groups 6021 -6062, 6091, 6099, 6111- 6163); 4. Drug stores (group 5912, limited to drug stores and pharmacies) in conjunction with health service groups and medical laboratories /research/rehabilitative groups; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 6 of 51 5. Hotels (group 7011) up to 135 rooms, capped at 92,000 square feet of gross floor area if a hotel is not developed in Tract C. Hotel square footage does not reduce the business park square footage cap. If the hotel conversion is applied to Tract BP, then a hotel is not permitted; 6. Membership organizations (group 8611); business associations (group 8621); professional organizations (8631); labor unions and similar labor organizations; 7. Personal services (groups 7215 -7231, 7241); 8. Physical fitness facilities and bowling centers (groups 7991, 7933); 9. Professional offices; insurance agencies (group 6411); insurance carriers (groups 6311- 6399); real estate (6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); holding and other investment offices (groups 6712- 6799); attorneys (group 8111); 10. Travel agencies (group 4724). C. Uses Accessory to Principal and Limited Uses: 1. I Jses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right; 2. One (1) caretaker's residence within Tract BP, Business Park Tract, subject to the following: i. The residence shall be constructed as an integral part of the principal structure and shall be entered from within the principal structure. Exits required to comply with fire code shall be permitted; ii. The caretaker's residence shall be an accessory use and shall be for the exclusive use of the property owner, tenant, or designated employee operating or maintaining the principal structure; iii. Off - street parking shall be as required for a single- family residence. 3. For primary business park uses, retail sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal uses shall not exceed an area greater than 20 percent of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use and is further subject to retail standards for landscaping, parking and open space. VI TRACT "C" COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES: Up to 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail land uses and up to 70,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office uses reduced by medical- related retail use square footages approved by SDP in Tract BP and reduced by up to 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of professional and medical office land use square footages approved by plat or SDP in Tract R/MU, The 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office may be exceeded if the retail land uses are converted to office thereby reducing the retail square footage, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation. Additionally, a hotel of up to 135 rooms and up to 92,000 square feet of gross floor area shall be allowed in Tract C unless a hotel is developed within Tract BP or if the hotel use is converted to BP uses in Tract BP based on an approved plat or SDP. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 7 of 51 A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family attached dwellings, (including townhouses intended for fee simple conveyance including the platted lot associated with the residence); 2. Multi- family dwellings; 3. Residential land uses integrated into commercial buildings with residential units located above commercial land uses to create a mixed -use building; 4. Accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services (group 8721); 5. Adjustment and collection services (group 7322); 6. Advertising agencies (group 7311); 7. Advertising — miscellaneous (group 7319); 8. Amusements and recreation services, indoor (groups 7911 -7922, 7991, 7993, 7999, only billiard parlors, bingo parlors, martial arts and yoga instruction, bicycle and golf cart rentals); 9. Apparel and accessory stores with (groups 5611- 5699); 10. Auto and home supply stores (groups 5211 -5261, and 5531); 11. Automotive dealers, not elsewhere classified (group 5599); 12. Automobile parking (group 7521), including garages- automobile parking, parking structures, no towing yards; 13. Automotive repair, services and parking (groups 7513 — 7533, 7536 - 7549); 14. Barber shops (group 7241), except barber schools; 15. Beauty shops (7231), except beauty schools; 16. Boat dealers (5551); 17. Bookkeeping services (8721); 18. Bowling centers, indoor (7933); 19. Building construction — General contractors (groups 1521 — 1542); 20. Building materials, hardware and garden supplies (groups 5211-5261); 21. Business associations (group 8611); 22. Business consulting services (group 8748); 23. Business credit institutions (groups 6153 - 6159); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 8 of 51 24. Business services (groups 7311 -7353, 7359, except labor contractors, 7371 -7379, 7381 except armored car and dog rental, 7382 -7389 except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, drive -away automobile, exhibits - building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats - decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, press clipping service, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, tape slitting, texture designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting and window trimming service); 25. Cable and other pay television services (group 4841); 26. Senior housing for persons over age 55, limited to independent and assisted living facilities, continuing care retirement communities, and nursing homes. This housing is included in the retail square foot limitation and no greater than 450 senior housing units shall be developed in this entire MPUD; 27. Child day care services (8351); 28. Commercial printing (2752, excluding newspapers); 29. Civic, social and fraternal associations (group 8641); 30_ Coin operated amusement devices, indoor (group 7993); 31. Communications (groups 4812 -4841) including communications towers up to specified height, subject to LDC Section 5.05.09; 32. Construction — special trade contractors (groups 1711 — 1793, 1796, 1799); 33. Dance studios, schools and halls (group 7911); 34. Drug stores (group 5912); 35. Depository institutions (groups 6011- 6099); 36. Eating and drinking establishments (group 5812, and group 5813) excluding bottle clubs. Outdoor amplified sound is prohibited, 37. Educational services (groups 8221, 8222, 8243 — 8249); 38. Engineering, accounting, research, management and related services (groups 8711- 8748); 39. Food stores (groups 5411- 5499); 40. Gasoline service stations (group 5541 subject to LDC requirements); 41. General merchandise stores (groups 5311, 5331 - 5399); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 9 of 51 42. Glass and glazing work (1793); 43. Health services (groups 8011 -8049, 8051 -8059, 8071 -8072, 8082 and 8092 - 8099); 44. Home furniture, furnishing, and equipment (groups 5712 - 5736); 45. Hotels and motels (groups 7011, 7021, and 704 1) only if a hotel is not built in Tract BP and the hotel conversion is not applied to Tract BP; 46. Insurance carriers, agents and brokers (groups 6311 -6399, 6411); 47. Landscape architects, consulting and planning (group 0781); 48. Legal services (group 8111); 49. Libraries (group 8231); 50. Management and public relations services (groups 8741 -8743, 8748); 51. Membership organizations (8611- 8699); 52. Membership sports and recreation clubs, indoor (group 7997); 53. Miscellaneous personal services (7291, 7299, debt counseling only); 54. Miscellaneous repair services (groups 7622 — 7699); 55. Miscellaneous retail (groups 5912 -5963, 5992 - 5999); 56. Motion picture theaters (group 7832); 57. Motorcycle dealers (group 5571); 58. Motor freight transportation and warehousing (group 4225 mini - and self - storage warehousing only); 59. Museums and art galleries (group 8412); 60. Non - depository credit institutions, and loan brokers (groups 6111 - 6163); 61. Offices for engineering, architectural, and surveying services (groups 0781, 871.1- 8713); 62. Paint, glass and wallpaper stores (5231); 63. Passenger car leasing (group 7515); 64. Passenger car rental (group 7514); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent —Rev, 09/15/11 Page 10 of 51 65. Personal services (groups 7211, 7212, 7215, 7216 nonindustrial dry cleaning only, 7217, 7219, 7221 -7251, no beauty or barber schools, 7261 except crematories, 7291, 7299, excluding massage parlors, escort services, steam baths, Turkish baths and tattoo parlors); 66. Photographic studios (7221); 67. Physical fitness facilities (7991); 68. Political organizations (group 8651); 69. Printing, publishing, and allied industries (groups 2711, 2721); 70. Professional membership organizations (group 8621); 71. Public Administration (groups 9111 - 9199, 9229, 9311, 9411 -9451, 9511 -9532, 9611 - 9661); 72. Public or private parks and playgrounds; 73. Public relations services (group 8743); 74. Radio, television, and consumer electronics stores (group 5731); 75. Radio and television broadcasting stations (groups 4832, and 4833); 76. Real estate (group 6512, 6531 - 6552); 77. Record and prerecorded tape stores (group 5735), excluding adult oriented rentals and sales; 78. Recreational vehicle dealers (group 5561); 79. Religious organizations (group 8661); 80. Research, development, and testing services (group 8731- 8734); 81. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores (group 5261); 82. Security and commodity brokers, dealer, exchanges and services (groups 6211 - 6289); 83. Theatrical producers and miscellaneous theatrical services, indoor (groups 7922- 7929); 84. Tour operators (group 4725); 85. Travel agencies (group 4724); 86. United States Postal Service (4311 except major distribution center); Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 11 of 51 87. Veterinary services (groups 0742, 0752 excluding outside kenneling); 88. Videotape rental (7841), excluding adult oriented rental and sales; 89. Vocational schools (groups 8243- 8299); 90. Any other commercial use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses and consistent with the purpose and intent statement of the district as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals. A. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking facilities and signage; 2. Eating/ Picnic Area; 3. One (1) caretaker's residence within the C, Commercial Tract; 4. Child care, outdoor play areas. Where play areas are constructed as an accessory use to a permitted use, the following conditions shall apply: a. A minimum five -foot, six -inch high reinforced fence shall be installed on all sides of the play area which are not open to the principal structure; b. Ingress to and egress from the play area shall be made only from the principal structure, however an emergency exit from the play area shall be provided which does not empty into the principal structure; c. The play equipment shall be set back a minimum distance of five feet from the required fence and from the principal structure. 5. Kiosks, that are small separate structures, often movable and open on one or more sides, used as a newsstand, vending stall, or other conveniences, Individual kiosks shall not to exceed 200 square feet.; VII TRACT "A" ATTRACTION PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. "Swamp Buggy" race track (group 7948, swamp buggy track only); 2. County fair and similar expositions, including circuses, carnivals, and other recreation/entertainment activities; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent —Rev, 09/15/11 Page 12 of 51 3. Exhibition hall /community center; Amateur soccer, softball, lacrosse, volleyball, football, and similar outdoor recreational sports and activities and shall not be limited in the number of occurrences; Indoor target ranges, including archery; 6. Stock car, monster trucks, and motorized vehicle race track (group 7948, motorized vehicle race track only); 7. Motocross (including bicycle and motorcycle) race course (group 7948, motocross race course only); 8. Stadium, training, and practice facilities for professional baseball (group 7941). This use is allowed only if a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval is processed in accordance with Section 380.06, F.S_, or any successor statute, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI is amended. 'If state law changes such that DRI review or other state review is no longer required then this provision shall terminate; 9. Administrative offices and supportive service facilities; 10. Any other use or structure that is comparable in nature to the foregoing and that is approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: Any accessory uses and structures that are incidental to and customarily associated with those uses permitted herein; Onsite water management, utility, and service facilities; 3. Signs as permitted or required by the applicable Collier County Land Development Code at the time of application for construction permits; 4. Residential facilities (one (1) residential unit within the A, Attraction Tract) for housing of security personnel or caretakers whose work requires residence on the property; Concessions, ticketing, bleachers, and other spectator - related facilities; Picnicking and playground areas, as well as areas for camping that may be utilized only three days prior to, during, and three days after a major event weekend. C. Conditional Uses: Fuel storage and related facilities. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 13 of 51 VIII TRACT "P" PRESERVE PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses I . Upland preserves; 2. Wetland preserves; B Accessory Uses and Structures Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, horse trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures; 3. Archaeological sites and associated research of said sites. IX TRACT "PF" PUBLIC FACILITY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses 1. Public safety facilities intended to provide emergency medical, ground transportation services. B. Accessory Uses Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: I . Parking facilities and signage; 2. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 3. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures. X TRACT "JD" JUNIOR DEPUTY PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 14 of 51 A. Principal Uses: 1. Open space and outdoor recreational uses, including, but not limited to hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; 2. Sporting and recreational camps; 3. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD, Junior Deputy Tract. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non - motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; 2. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen/plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; 3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4, Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and/or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures; 7. Restroorns/bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). XI TRACT "S" SCHOOLS PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Schools, public or private, including Educational Services (Group 82). Hacienda Lakes, PU DZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 15 of 51 B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Educational facilities; 2. Parking facilities and signage; 3. Administrative offices and support service facilities; 4. Lighting or storm water management facilities and structures; 5. Recreational facilities. XII SIGNS: A. Seven, on- premise, ground signs shall be permitted on property congers fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways as depicted and labeled "Boundary Marker" on Sheets 3 and 4 of the MPUD Master Plan Set. These ground signs shall be allowed in addition to other signage allowed by Section 5.06.00 of the LDC. Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). B. One real estate sign shall be permitted in the Commercial Tract for the purposes of marketing residential products within the MPUD. This additional real estate signage may be utilized by any of the developers of the residential communities within the MPUD (See Exhibit E, Deviation #6). C. The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until new signage can be permitted in Tract C. (See Exhibit E, Deviation #7) Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 16 of 51 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Conversion of residential land use types are provided for below which may be utilized to apportion units to senior housing or recreational vehicle units relative to the mix of residential land uses within this MPUD and their relation to public facility impacts. Table I below, sets forth the development standards for residential land uses within the MPUD, including residential land uses that are required to be developed in Tracts C and R/MU. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Figures 1 thru 7 generally depict typical development standards for the various residential products. Table II below, sets forth the development standards for commercial land uses, senior housing units, and public facility land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table III below, sets forth the development standards for the business park land uses and school land uses within the MPUD, however these standards do not apply to the Collier County School District public schools. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. Table IV below, sets forth the development standards for the Attraction land uses and Junior Deputy passive recreation land uses within the MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. The facilities and improvements that are depicted on Exhibit C, the MPUD Master Plan shall be considered conceptual in nature. The design, location, and configuration of land improvements shall be defined at either site development plan, or construction plans and plat approval(s). Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and /or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. MAXIMUM DENSITY AND INTENSITY: Residential Density: This MPUD shall be limited to 1,760 residential dwelling units (du) that equates to a density of 0.78 dwelling units per gross acre. The 1,760 residential units are either single- or multi- family units as defined in the LDC. No more than 1,232 multi - family units may be constructed in the entire PUD. Caretakers residences shall be deducted from the 1,760 unit allocation. A minimum of 25 residential units shall be constructed in the R/MU Tract, and a minimum of 17 residential units shall be constructed in Tract C. The balance of the residential dwelling units generated from Tract C (13 units) must be constructed in either the R/MU Tract, or on a portion of Tract R, within one -third of one mile of the boundary of Tract C. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 17 of 51 LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS Residential Density: 1.0 residential unit equates to 2.73 Recreational Vehicle units /spaces (not to exceed 290 RV units in the entire PUD), or 4 Senior Housing Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Units in the entire PUD). Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi- family as defined in the Land Development Code. Commercial Intensity: Hacienda Lakes is intended to be developed with a mixture of commercial land uses that include 327,500 square feet of gross floor area of retail uses, 50,000 square feet of gross floor area of medical office uses, 20,000 square feet of gross floor area of general office uses, 140,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses, and 135 hotel rooms. In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Such maximum trip generation cap was developed based on 327,500 gross square feet of retail land uses, 50,000 gross square feet of medical office land uses, 20,000 gross square feet of general office land uses, 140,000 gross square feet of business park land uses, a primary school with a contemplated enrollment of 919 students, 135 hotel rooms, not to exceed 92,000 gross square feet, 704 single - family units, and 1,056 multi - family units. However, the hotel shall not count against the 140,000 square foot cap associated with the business park. Should the BP Tract not be developed as a business park but be developed as a school facility (excluding Collier County School District public schools), such facility shall not exceed the maximum 140,000 gross square feet allowed in that Tract. The developer shall be allowed to convert retail land uses to office land uses at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation, provided only if the converted use is an allowed use in the tract. The developer shall also be allowed to wholly convert the hotel development opportunity of 135 rooms not to exceed 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of gross floor area of business park land uses. All existing land uses and facilities in the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts shall not count against the overall trip and land use cap. Senior Housing Intensity: The intensity of any senior housing project shall have a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.60. The 1,760 dwelling unit cap is only intended to limit the number of single family and multi - family residential units, as those units are defined in the Land Development Code. The development may include in excess of 1,760 residential units if some are developed as senior housing units. With the exception of senior housing development in the C, Commercial Tract, senior housing units shall be developed through the conversion of residential land uses. Residential units shall be allowed for conversion to senior housing units based on the Land Use Conversion Factors, above. However, 1 single - family dwelling unit equates to 1 single- family style independent living units. In no instance shall greater than 450 senior housing units be developed in the entire MPUD. Total Project Intensity: In no event shall the project exceed 3,328 pm Peak Hour Trips. Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care /housing facilities. These care /housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 18 of 51 • The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; • There shall be on -site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on -site, or catered; • Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; • There shall be an onsite manager /activities coordinator to assist residents, who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; • An on -site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents. • Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; • Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. Recreational Vehicle Park Criteria • Any RV Park may be located in one location as generally depicted on Exhibit C, MPUD Master Plan. • This area shall be developed either with an RV Park or residential land uses, and not be a combination of both. • The RV Park shall be limited to Class A motorcoaches only. • In no instance shall greater than 290 Recreational Vehicle units be developed in the entire MPUD. • The density of the RV park shall not exceed 12 RV units for each acre of the development parcel [not less than 20 acres]. • The Lord's way shall be the principal access to Collier Boulevard (CR -951). • A 25 foot Type C landscape buffer shall be located between any RV land use and adjoining residentially zoned or developed parcel. Sisn Development Standards Boundary Markers shall be no greater than 15 feet in height, and shall not exceed 64 square feet of sign content area (See Exhibit E, Deviation #3). Each of these permitted signs shall only contain the name of the project or any major use, insignia or motto of the entire development. Any signage proposed for identifying the on -site Swamp Buggy Attraction land use in the Commercial Tract may be illuminated and manually changeable so the traveling public may learn of upcoming events in the Attraction Tract. Any land uses permitted within the boundaries of the MPUD shall be considered on -site for the purposes of providing for signage within the Commercial Tract. Site Development, or Plat Approval • At the time of each development order application subsequent to rezone approval, the developer or its successors and assigns shall submit a list of previously approved land uses (approved via site development plan, or plat), and the trips, commercial square footage and residential units consumed to date. Developer shall also provide to County a copy of its master list of land uses and converted uses for this PUD with each SDP or plat application in the form attached as Exhibit G. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 19 of 51 TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SETBACK SINGLE ZERO LOT TWO TOWNHOUSE MULTI- CLUB RECREAT- FAMILY LINE FAMILY/ FAMILY HOUSE/ IONAL DETACHED DUPLEX DWELLINGS REC- VEHICLE REATION PARKS BLDGS PRINCIPAL. STRUCTURES Minimum Lot Area 4,800 SF 4,000 SF 3,500 SF per 1,800 SF per lot 1 acre 800 SF per lot 10,000 SF space/unit Minimum Lot Width 40' 35' 35' per lot 18'per lot or 150' 35' unit N/A 15' or V BH, 15' or' /z RH, 15' or ' /z BIT, 15' or''A RN, 15' or %z BH, 15' or %: BH, 15' Minimum Distance From whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is MPUD Boundary eater. greater- greater. greater. greater, greater. 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20', or 15' 20' 20' or %z BH, 10' with side with side with side whichever is Front Yard Setback load garages load garages load garages greater, N/A Side Yard 6' 0' or 10' 0' or 6 0' or 6' %2 BH 5' N/A Rear Yard 15' 15' 15' 15' 15' or Yz BII, 8' whichever is eater N/A From Preserve 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' 25' Maximum Zoned Height 35' 35' 35' 45' 75' 40' 30' Maximum Actual Height 42' 42' 42' 50' 85' 50' 35' Floor Area Minimum (SF) 1200 SF 1000 SF 1000 SF 900 SF 750 SF N/A N/A Minimum Distance 15' or 1/2 1.0' Between Principal Structures 12' 10' 12' 12' %z SBH SBH, whichever is greater ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Front SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Side SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS Rear 5' 5' 5' 5' 5' 10' SPS From Preserve 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' 10' Minimum Distance 10' Between Accessory Structures on same lot 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Minimum Distance 0' OR 10' Between Accessory and Principle Structures on same lot 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' 0' or 10' Maximum Zoned Height SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS SPS Maximum Actual Height SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS 35' SPS Minimum Distance From 15'or' /a BH 15' or' /, BH 15' or 1/2 BH 15' or %BH 15' or %: BH 15' or Yz BH 15' or %: BH MPUD Boundary" whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is whichever is reate greater greater greater I greater I greater I greater SPS: Same as Principal Structure LL: Lot Line BOC: Back Of Curb Paseo: A pedestrian only access way to and from residences. N /A: Not Applicable BH: Zoned Building Height SBH: Sum of Building Heights "Principal and Accessory Uses shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 20 of 51 General application of setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. Notes: 1) . Structures adjacent to a lake may have no setback from the lake maintenance easement. 2) Entrance features (i.e.: guard house, clock towers and colonnades) are limited in height to no greater than 35 feet in actual height. 3) Two or three story multi- family structures may have terraced setbacks. Terraced setbacks shall be measured from the ground floor exterior wall, as long as a minimum 15 -foot building wall setback is provided as depicted in Figure 1 below. 4) For all residential units, garages shall be located a minimum of 23 feet from the back of the sidewalk closest to the garage, except for side loaded garages, wherein a parking area 23 feet in depth must be provided perpendicular to the sidewalk to prevent vehicles being parked across a portion, or all of the referenced sidewalk. 5) No residential buildings greater than 50 feet in actual height shall be permitted west of the Florida Power and Light easement. PROPERTY LINE Figure I Terraced Setbacks Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09 /15/11 Page 21 of 51 1 PRESERVE 5' YIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY _ - - -� _ - _ - - _ - STRUCTURE SETBACK 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE I 1S' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK STRUCTURE SETBACK` FROM PRESERVE 1 ACC STR 1 e, MIN ' 12' MIN. 8' MN. I S' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 PRINCIPAL I 23' YIN. STRUCTURE I I cTYPa 1 ! FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL I - - T ^' FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I T STRUCTURE SETBACK 1S' MIN. 20 iYN.- 23' YIN. ROW - 5' SIDEWALK- RACK OF CU 10' YIN. CENTUUNE ---- -} - - - - - ACC. SM. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 2 Detached Single- Family Units PRESETAIE ) .✓� 5' MN, REAR YARD ACCESSORY 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACCESSORY � _ _ -_ - r _ I _ - _ _ '- - � - - _ _ „- STRUCTURE SETBACK STRUCTLRE SETBACK I FROM PRESERVE I I 13' YIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL 25 FOOT MINIMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK STRUCTURE SETBACK ACC. STR FROM PRESERVE I I I ! I I 1 10' MIN. 10' MIN. 10' MIN. `^O' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL I I I I STRUCTURE SETBACK ! 1 PRINCIPAL I 1 23' MIN. STRUCTURE I I (TYP.) I I FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL 1 i - I II'- -FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 1 1 i 12' j. Ii STf«1CTURE SETBACK 15' ROW MIN. y M j� 5' SIDEWALK - -ylN, BACK OF CURB 10' YIN. NE-- - CFJRERLI^-- -� ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 3 Detached Single - Family /Zero Lot Line Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 22 of 51 R 10 FOOT MWIMUM ACCESSORY - STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 25 FOOT MIwMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK S' SID BACK OF PRESERVE 1 S' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY r ...,i , _ _ STRUCTURE SETBACK _ - _ - _ - - - 7/13' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL I STRUCTURE SETBACK I20i IMIN. I -- 10' MIN. - __T_ _ __ ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STNUCTURE �-NO SIDE YARD REQUIRED FOR I ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UNITS 1 I t MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/1 1 Page 23 of 51 PRESERVE J iJ s' MIN. NEAR YARD ACCESSORY �'�•��J` -���_ �.�� -'� sTRUCrURE sCr&4cx 10 FOOT MINIMUM ACS - -- - - -- -- - I - -- - -- - - �- -- FROM PRESERVE I I I I I 15 MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK 29 FOCI MINIMUM PRINCIPAL I ( M. I I I STRUCTURE SETBACK CK SIR FROM PRESERVE I I I I I I I I I NO SIDE YARD REQUIRED FOR b' MIN. t2' MIN. ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UNITS I I I I I I I 1 23' MIN. STRUCTURE S' MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL I I I I I I STRUCTURE SETLACK I SI 4 ; l— I YARD PRINCIPAL StAUC`T�URE 20' I SETBACK 15' MIN. I ROW 5' SIDEIMALK ---- - aux OF C 10' MIN. CENTERLWE - - - - - ACC. SIR. - ACCESSORY STRUCTURE NOT N SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONNIY Figure 4 Duplex and Two - Family Units 10 FOOT MWIMUM ACCESSORY - STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE 25 FOOT MIwMUM PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK FROM PRESERVE FRONT YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK S' SID BACK OF PRESERVE 1 S' MIN. REAR YARD ACCESSORY r ...,i , _ _ STRUCTURE SETBACK _ - _ - _ - - - 7/13' MIN. REAR YARD PRINCIPAL I STRUCTURE SETBACK I20i IMIN. I -- 10' MIN. - __T_ _ __ ACC. STR. - ACCESSORY STNUCTURE �-NO SIDE YARD REQUIRED FOR I ATTACHED PRINCIPAL UNITS 1 I t MIN. SIDE YARD PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE SETBACK I NOT TO SCALE NOT DRAWN PROPORTIONALLY Figure 5 Attached Single- Family and Townhouse Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/1 1 Page 23 of 51 to Poor rerNUY r�-- �'��'`� ^� :aC -S, _ _ �'--� _ TACT uwE� — — — — — — ACCCOM SLINO ►sr Is' eEn Rue YARO !S FOOT 1EN111UY I ALL. fill. ACC SIR. PP NWX PI�ICIPAL 9IA1lCRMtE 1 91F11Ci1JRE Sr :lf FON Pftme E 3URCE 1/2 111E SW a IM NUU" t/! BUSD Nl9ONf A T!A I Fn11CM Ngl�w YAM 910E YAW PNMCVAL _ _ 90011 OF AM SM - ACCESSORY STRt1CRME Nor TO V&E NOT O MM PfKWQTrKk#A.Lr Figure 6 Multi- Family Units Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent —Rev. 09/15/11 Page 24 of 51 TABLE H COMMERCIAL, INCLUDING MIXED USE BUILDINGS, PUBLIC FACILITY, AND SENIOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL. USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM LOT BOUNDARY) 25 FEET OR %z THE BUILDING HEIGHT, WHICHEVER IS GREATER * ** 10 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES * * ** 25 FEET 10 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR % THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET * * * ** 25 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 60 FEET * * * ** 30 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — COMMERCIAL MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SENIOR HOUSING MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — PUBLIC FACILITY 600 SQUARE FEET ** 350 SQUARE FEET 1,500 SQUARE FEET N/A N/A N/A MIN, GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT 600 SQUARE FEET ** 80 SQUARE FEET ** * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to kiosks * ** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. * * ** Principal and Accessory Structures shall not protrude or encroach into any required landscape buffer. * * * ** except that a hotel, destination resort, senior housing or mixed use building may be up to 75 feet in zoned height and 85 feet in actual height. Note: Any independent living unit proposed for development in a single - family type of configuration shall comply with the development standards for single - family land uses set forth in Table I. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 25 of 51 TABLE III BUSINESS PARK AND SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 8,000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM LOT" WIDTH 80 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT 50 FEET * ** 10 FEET BOUNDARY) — BUSINESS PARK MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY)—SCHOOL 50 FFF'I' * ** 25 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD N/A N/A BOUNDARIES PRESF,RVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT. OR %: THE SUM OF 10 FEET STRUCTURES - BUSINESS PARK BUILDING HEIGHTS MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN or 18 FEET 10 FEET STRUCTURES - SCI IDOL MAXIMUM ZONED F-IF,IGIIT -BUSINESS PARK 35 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT- SCI 1001, 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT — BUSINESS PARK 50 FEET 35 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT - SCHOOL 60 FEET 60 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — BUSINESS PARK 1000 SQUARE FEET N/A MINIMUM FLOOR AREA — SCHOOL or 350 SQUARE FEET 35 SQUARE FEET MIN. GROSS FLOOR AREA PER UNIT BUSINESS PARK 500 SQUARE FEET 80 SQUARE FEET SCHOOL. N/A N/A * Whichever is greater * ** General application for setbacks: Front yard setbacks shall comply with the following: i. If the parcel is served by a public or private road right -of -way, the setback is measured from the adjacent right -of -way line. ii. If the parcel is served by a non - platted private drive, the setback is measured from the back of curb or edge of pavement. The Lord's Way Access Improvements: In the event that Tract BP is developed as a business park, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer with roadway facilities as depicted by LDC Appendix B -4, a Commercialfindustrial typical roadway section, prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for a business park land use. In the event that Tract BP is developed as an educational facility, the Lord's Way shall be improved by the Developer as depicted by LDC Appendix B -3, a Local Street typical roadway section. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent— Rev. 09/15/11 Page 26 of 51 TABLE IV ATTRACTION AND JUNIOR DEPUTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARD PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 1 ACRE N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 100 FEET N/A MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM TRACT BOUNDARY) 20 FEET, PLUS 1 FOOT FOR EACH 2 FEET OF BLDG. HT. OVER 50 FEET 20 FEET MINIMUM YARDS (MEASURED FROM MPUD BOUNDARIES 25 FEET 20 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 10 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FT. OR `/z THE SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS* 10 FEET MAXIMUM ZONED HEIGHT 50 FEET 50 FEET MAXIMUM ACTUAL HEIGHT 75 FEET 75 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1000 SQUARE FEET ** N/A * Whichever is greater ** Not applicable to modular units, trailers, towers, camping pavilion, and similar structures to support the utilization of the attraction facilities, which have no minimum floor area limitations Parking for Junior Deputy: Required parking for the JD designated areas of the MPUD shall be calculated at the rate of one parking space for each 1000 square feet of covered camping pavilion. Junior Deputy Target Orientation: Archery and air rifle ranges shall be oriented for a line of fire only to the east, or north, and shall have a back stop that shall be comprised of absorbing materials such as an earthen berm, hay bales, or similar treatments, each installed according to industry standards, to prohibit projectiles from exiting the range area. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 27 of 51 Exhibit C V A $ a, go N m,A m m �r �fTY Exhibit C a 3g�ccoaa ° °� 4� S sM �R° F^a`Rz 5i Ssj R44 " -F-o �O a 510# r k GG� z "��i ° = =� T3 :^ 4 - !Sync g$'- q'n�R 6zg Rm £yN g F^ Ado a ;5 Y* Acnx k A 4 u�5 xus N..i v Ph k�z NQ 9 S A A £ 9 R Pax � � p R �q�,qF2 "E E f ooi L7 7gc €2p�l A—% R ;it a F�if "g Qty F ��8 s° R G ° :n on 33 5 SRS ' { >st I:e e € R ' �R g 9' °fig fi K�w fig a - L�er -- y 9 g NW: r- /Tim T MANN 911tl �ntltl /k0.'NAC tfd,P4E �l` DIX �j7j(_ HACIENDA LAKES OFNAPLES, LLC M HACIENDA LAKES aui�oaav OVERALL MPUD/DRI C `S� .�N 1 ove t si MASTER PLAN MPUD/DRI �N,° M' , tannH�a �u: > s_�_�� g33�f� s �fTY i i m c ��g33qq3 .62i 7$ i � as3 K 3e3_� E 3 aRAJX�A�A �C1mQ�C1�pE�f3 � VTF�3d i 3 "� i ValQ; 3 rg a 3g�ccoaa ° °� 4� S sM �R° F^a`Rz 5i Ssj R44 " -F-o �O a 510# r k GG� z "��i ° = =� T3 :^ 4 - !Sync g$'- q'n�R 6zg Rm £yN g F^ Ado a ;5 Y* Acnx k A 4 u�5 xus N..i v Ph k�z NQ 9 S A A £ 9 R Pax � � p R �q�,qF2 "E E f ooi L7 7gc €2p�l A—% R ;it a F�if "g Qty F ��8 s° R G ° :n on 33 5 SRS ' { >st I:e e € R ' �R g 9' °fig fi K�w fig a - L�er -- y 9 g NW: r- /Tim T MANN 911tl �ntltl /k0.'NAC tfd,P4E �l` DIX �j7j(_ HACIENDA LAKES OFNAPLES, LLC M HACIENDA LAKES aui�oaav OVERALL MPUD/DRI C `S� .�N 1 ove t si MASTER PLAN MPUD/DRI �N,° M' , tannH�a �u: > s_�_�� s m c Q C K aRAJX�A�A �C1mQ�C1�pE�f3 � a 3g�ccoaa ° °� 4� S sM �R° F^a`Rz 5i Ssj R44 " -F-o �O a 510# r k GG� z "��i ° = =� T3 :^ 4 - !Sync g$'- q'n�R 6zg Rm £yN g F^ Ado a ;5 Y* Acnx k A 4 u�5 xus N..i v Ph k�z NQ 9 S A A £ 9 R Pax � � p R �q�,qF2 "E E f ooi L7 7gc €2p�l A—% R ;it a F�if "g Qty F ��8 s° R G ° :n on 33 5 SRS ' { >st I:e e € R ' �R g 9' °fig fi K�w fig a - L�er -- y 9 g NW: r- /Tim T MANN 911tl �ntltl /k0.'NAC tfd,P4E �l` DIX �j7j(_ HACIENDA LAKES OFNAPLES, LLC M HACIENDA LAKES aui�oaav OVERALL MPUD/DRI C `S� .�N 1 ove t si MASTER PLAN MPUD/DRI �N,° M' , tannH�a �u: > EXHIBIT D LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN T14E STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION I1 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89 °10'42 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.8901 1'14"W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89 °09139 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 °11'01 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 °13'35 "W, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.0094'15 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87 °07'13 "E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01 008'02 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 012'28 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01'04'1 1 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'21 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89 001'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 0 18'52 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89 022'00 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 114'38 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89 101158 "W, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01 101'15 "E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89 001'58 "W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01 °01'15 "W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89 001'58 "W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00 151154 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °37'31 "E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01 °01'15 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 037131 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00 148'00 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 031'38 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00148'I I"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 028'42 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00 °48'45 "E. ALONG SAID WEST Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent- Rev. 09/15/11 Page 29 of 51 AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °27'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00 °49'30 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N.00 050'27 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87 °28'56 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 149'13 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 025'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87 °25'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 147'37 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 127'14 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 047'14 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °2842 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87 °30'06 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °38'50 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.0004 1'44"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 140'34 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 136'23 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87 °26'11 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °35'02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 030'06 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 038'50 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 132'03 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 035'02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °33'59 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °38'51 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °37'27 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 142'40 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 040'54 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 156'29 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 134'58 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °4 1'32 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 041'38 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 026'32 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 033'18 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 30 of 51 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °34'02 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 128'21 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88 °12'42 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03 139'20 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88 °56'10 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 007'20 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °07'1.3 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03 °18'31 "E. FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88 056'54 "E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00 131'35 "E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89 °15'59 "E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 037'14 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 134143 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00 °41'48 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °23'00 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °22'35 "E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00 152'45 "E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 °46'12 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 049'34 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 157'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 °12'08 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00 059'10 "W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 °22'35 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 155'57 "E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89 °46'12 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 °2821 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °40'10 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87°l7'48 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °56'29 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 023'02 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15111 Page 31 of 51 OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 °00'20 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15!11 Page 32 of 51 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation 41 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.0l.B, related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have platted road rights -of -way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided by separate access easements rather than platted road rights -of way. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.13.5.c that limits the number of model homes, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the various phases or communities within the project. The number of model homes may exceed five for each phase or community within the project, but shall not exceed a total of 60 models for the entire MPUD development. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. The sign content area for "boundary markers" to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet in height as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet throughout the development. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or Tract A, a 20 foot tall visual screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall /berm combination. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.13 G., and 4.06.02 C.5., that requires a six foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park_ Buffering around the proposed Business Park Tract would be as required by the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC, but the six foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof will not be required on the Business Park Tract along the frontage of Lord's Way. Deviation #6 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off -site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. Deviation 07 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain in the present location until: the sign is relocated to allow the construction of the bridge to extend Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and /or a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.I. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 33 of 51 EXHIBIT F LIST OF OWNER COMMITMENTS For the purposes of this PUD, the owner commitments set forth below are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, its successors, and/or assigns. The owner commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy Days, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. LEGAL A. Access to Parcel "A ", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via a new roadway easement from Owner that shall be recorded in the public records of Collier County, and shall run in a north -south direction from the existing thirty -foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90 -days of approval of this PUD. B. Access to Parcel "B ", as described in Exhibit D of this document and is not a part of this MPUD shall be accessible via the existing roadway and ingress /egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 622, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, Page 124, and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. C. No existing public access /roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude access to off -site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new roadway easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. II ENVIRONMENTAL A. Native vegetation shall be preserved in this MPUD in accordance with the table below: Hacienda Lakes Native Preserve mmary Description Total Urban (ac) Rural ac Project Area 2262.14 625.07 1637.07 On -Site Native Vegetation 1721.97 295.38 1426.59 Less the Native Vea Within Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. 2.02 2.02 0.00 Less the Native Veq Within The Lords Way Ext. 0.42 0.42 0.00 Less the Native Veg Within the Benfield Road Corridor 12.91 5.01 7.90 Less the Native Veg Within Archaeological Preserves 6.07 1.06 5.02 Native Vegetation For Requirement Calculations 1700.54 286.87 1413.67 Percentage for required Native Preserve - 25% Required Native Vegetation* x921.09 71.71 x849.38 Preserved Native Vegetation "` 1395.35 40.81 1352.57 Compensating Native Preserve 2x URF Deficit `w 61.80 Total Preserve Area 1544.14 53.06 1491.08 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 34 of 51 * Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02.B.2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMUD Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMUD Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. ** Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.1.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Subdistrict Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMUD project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Subdistrict project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. B. A Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring plan is to be submitted once approved from SFWMD, for County review. C. The MPUD shall be developed in accordance with the Wildlife Habitat Management Plan accepted by Collier County as contained in the Environmental Impact Statement. D. An updated listed species survey for the future development areas shall be submitted prior to the next development order approval. E. Installation of the Sabal Palm Road culvert crossings and spreader swales shall occur prior to the first preliminary acceptance. III ENGINEERING A. A SFWMD ROW permit will be required for widening the bridge at Rattlesnake Hammock/951 over the Henderson Creek Canal. IV ARCHAEOLOGICAL and HISTORIC RESOURCES A. The five archaeological sites identified within the Hacienda Lakes parcel are denoted AP, Archaeological Preserve on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan Set. These sites must remain undeveloped. A public access easement around the archaeological sites for potential digs and further study has been provided. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with County approval and approval of the State Division of Historical Resources, and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. B. Historical /archeological areas are not used to meet preserve requirements because if an archaeological dig is required, then native vegetation would have to be removed. V EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES A. Tn order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services (EMS), the developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. This public facility site is identified as "PF" on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit Q. The dedication of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation of the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, for the purposes of the Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit, and the conveyance shall occur no later than at the time the 500" residential unit is included in a development order request (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this paragraph, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 35 of 51 mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County -owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. VI TRANSPORTATION For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfreld Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA 1. The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance "), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here forward to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request. ") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 36 of 51 1— Hacienda lakes DRI - r- 11. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site related improvements, Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and-, 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 1,35 Room Hotel, and-, Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10146 Approved CCPC Consent —Rev. 09/15/11 Page 37 of 51 These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. A. 4r Rattlesriak* Hantrmloxck O'd ension Fold A Florida Povver Line Easement 111111MLM Ill. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion ofthe capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 111146 Approved CCPC Consent— Rev. 09/15/11 Page 38 of 51 Figure 2 — Hacienda Lakes DRI - CDmmitmot 11 4* Existing LarreivrTurn Lanes Lanes/Tom lanes to betoavru"ed/AecorstwCted Roadway Segment Previously Consructed Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed . . ............. Area to bt Developed A Pxential Area to be Developed A. 4r Rattlesriak* Hantrmloxck O'd ension Fold A Florida Povver Line Easement 111111MLM Ill. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Since only a portion ofthe capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes PUD, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 111146 Approved CCPC Consent— Rev. 09/15/11 Page 38 of 51 of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right of way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 3, below. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site-related improvement. I Figure 3 — Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment III R3010"akl Hammock Roa�xtens M ■1 �1 NORTH AREA IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.R.951 at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.95 I ). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge. This improvement is a site related improvement. Hacienda Lakes, PLTDZ-2006-AR- 10146 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15111 Page 39 of 51 Figure 4— Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment IV Power Line Easement PWA JAMnd 11* Existing kunes/%rn Lanes LaneS/Turn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Construccod Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed Area to be Devclooed V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (cast and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site-related improvements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006• AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15.111 Page 40 of 51 MM Power Line Easement PWA JAMnd 11* Existing kunes/%rn Lanes LaneS/Turn Lanes to be Constructed/Reconstructed Roadway Segment Previously Construccod Roadway Segment to be Constructed Area Previously Developed Area to be Devclooed V. The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (cast and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact fee credits. These improvements are site-related improvements. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006• AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15.111 Page 40 of 51 These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5, below. When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential development authorized by the DRI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right of way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road, If Collier County requests the road right of way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right of way up to a width of 60 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, and shall receive impact fee credits equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County. If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this,commitmom shall be considered expired. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 41 of 51 BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI. The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right of way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right of way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvements, the Owner shall convey to the County a road casement for the road right of way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road casement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road casement necessary for this section of Benfield Road and for 100% of the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 5010 of the conveyance of the road right of way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent (50%) of the fair market value of the road right of way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site-related improvements. The Cost of this improvement wilt be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-1 0 146 Approved CCPC Consent —Rev. 09115/11 Page 42 of 51 VII, Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right of way to Collier County by road casement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 1.20 feet, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement. The value of the right of way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, The area to be conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev, 09/15111 Page 43 of 51 VIII. Benfield Road South of Saba] Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the right of way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Saba] Palm Road (approximately 1,00 mike) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right of way conveyance, This is a site- related improvement. The area to be dedicated is depicted in figure 8, below. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 44 of 51 ■ ® ■ IX As a part of its State and Federal permits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for State and or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or (2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater management system. These are site-related contributions. X. At two thresholds during construction of this DRJ, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share, (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of which this DRI impacts County and State road segments. If Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in Rill, The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the surn of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site-related transportation Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ-2006-AR-10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev, 09/15/11 Page 45 of 51 improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Berifield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right-of-way conveyance by donation to the County unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DRI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. XI. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan, This is a site-related contribution. XII. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract, the Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop/shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a 10'x 20" pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stop/shelter unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County an easement for the bus shelter. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted below on the Master Mobility Plan. This is a site-related contribution. )WI. DRI traffic studies identified an off-site impact at the interchange of 1-75 and S.R, 951 Ramps Intersection, specific-ally in the left -turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound (northbound) 1-75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the DRI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under subsection X above is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build-out of the DRI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating o at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or ) =DOT, then the Developer will identi6, a solution to Offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per subsection X above, of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution. Hacienda Lakes, P U DZ-2006-A R- 1, 0 146 Approved CCPC Consent —Rev. 09/15/11 Page 46 of 51 XIV. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances that are eligible for impact fee credits described in Subsections III, V, VI and V[I of this Article Vl, Transportation, then fawner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. The total cost of State and Federal mitigation includes Iand costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental pennitting cost, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental' mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County -owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection XV. Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ -2006 -AID -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev; 09/15/11 Page 47 of 51 0 EXISTING CAT ROUTE I a (TO MARCO ISLAND) Legend Land Use CA7S70PfSHEUrER Z "° jmM$ Aft e b Twtt PMPO"d CAT Rouse -4A a 48 Extgui" Susfna Pla* cr Wm, ExWin GAT R0uW4A648 comm,4w ExMq GAT FaWiry 4A Pm-7ram esisumg =raamy4a pt6. racstws Trail (Ems) Exiwjng CA, Rowe I ux Pro,,,,d Pods A6- Fadillies S&oa yr Rwi-d ,4 Ttad PnW Dovndary Redden: i modlCAI J" D&M.pmvt$0,.)dufy : Public Row Raiwvkvion it DEVELOPER Proposed PROPOSED Access CAT STOPISHELTER RATTLESNAKE PROP, RATTLESNAKE 0 0 EXISTING CAT ROUTE I a (TO MARCO ISLAND) Legend Land Use CA7S70PfSHEUrER Z "° jmM$ Aft e b Twtt PMPO"d CAT Rouse -4A a 48 Extgui" Susfna Pla* cr Wm, ExWin GAT R0uW4A648 comm,4w ExMq GAT FaWiry 4A Pm-7ram esisumg =raamy4a pt6. racstws Trail (Ems) Exiwjng CA, Rowe I Jaliw DKuty Pro,,,,d Pods A6- Fadillies S&oa E.—G Shared Lj- P.0 Rwi-d ,4 Ttad PnW Dovndary Redden: i modlCAI J" D&M.pmvt$0,.)dufy : Public Row Raiwvkvion Proposed A00as EXISTING CAT ROUTE 4A S�ING EXISTING EXISTING CAT CAT 4 Al G 7 CAT FACILITY FACILITY ROUTE: 4A 4A(TYP) 4B(TYP) & I , 48 "1 Hacienda Lakes F-1 Master Mobility Plan N M= -'- POTENTIAL CAT STOWSHELTER Wilt 1 frawrtal Road* n It Not Sh STATE LANDS DIVA' A%. v x A rip: T,'t4pecW�M659t4J,Y.:9_ = ■ DEVELOPER PROPOSED CAT STOWSHELTER THE LORD'S VOA POTENTIAL CAT STOP/SHELTER/ PROPOSED 4A & 48 CAT ROUTE EXTENSION DEVELOPER Proposed PROPOSED Access CAT STOPISHELTER RATTLESNAKE PROP, RATTLESNAKE EXISTING CAT ROUTE 4A S�ING EXISTING EXISTING CAT CAT 4 Al G 7 CAT FACILITY FACILITY ROUTE: 4A 4A(TYP) 4B(TYP) & I , 48 "1 Hacienda Lakes F-1 Master Mobility Plan N M= -'- POTENTIAL CAT STOWSHELTER Wilt 1 frawrtal Road* n It Not Sh STATE LANDS DIVA' A%. v x A rip: T,'t4pecW�M659t4J,Y.:9_ = ■ VII PUBLIC UTILITIES A. Per the current 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the majority area of this project is located within the Collier County Water-Sewer District Boundary; there are some areas of this project that currently are outside of the Collier County Water & Sewer District Boundary- The areas that are not part of Collier County Water-Sewer District also do not belong to any other Water-Sewer District. Since Public Utilities can provide service as requested by this project, Impact Fees will be applied to the entire area to be developed. B. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location to be determined by the CCWSD when capacity is available. C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. D. This future development is located on the zone of the existing South Hawthorn Wellfield for the wellfield-SCRWTP expansion to 20 MGD. The Rules and Regulations for protection of well fields shall be followed. All well sites and pipeline easements located oil and close to this development needs to be shown on all future site development plans, PPL or any other site plans applications. VIII PLANNING A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential Development Order in the Hacienda Lakes MPUD, the Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and the riling of executed Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) shall occur for these same lands. B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), [shall] be attached/applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) for the Hacienda Lakes project. IX SWAMP BUGGY DAYS RECREATION AND SPORTS PARK PUD GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS The following commitments shall only apply to the Attraction and Junior Deputy Tracts: General Provisions A. All motor racing shall normally be limited to weekends and holidays. No motor racing or practice will commence earlier than 9-00 a.m. and all racing shall be completed no later -than 11:00 p.m. B. The shooting and archery ranges shall meet accepted design standards regarding safety and shall be operated and maintained in accordance with accepted safe practices. For security and safety, access to the shooting and archery range areas shall be limited by fencing or other suitable barriers. Hacienda Lakes, PU DZ-2006-AR- 10 146 Approved CCPC Consent— Rev. 09115111 Page 49 of 51 C. Fencing and/or other suitable barriers will be provided on the site by the Owner for security, safety, and traffic control. Roadways and Traffic A. Roadways within the subject property shall be private roadways and shall be maintained by the Owner. Therefore, said roadways shall be constructed and surfaced in accordance with accepted practices and as permitted by the County Engineer. B. For special events such as the Swamp Buggy races, and as deemed necessary by the County Sheriff, the Owner will arrange for special traffic control at the intersection of the main entrance road with CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Utilities and Service Facilities A. The potable water supply source for the project shall be the County regional water system (now known as the Collier County Water Sewer District). B. Permanent sanitary facilities shall be provided for everyday use by administrative and other personnel. Treatment and disposal of wastewater from said facilities shall be by septic tank/drainfield, or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and /or State regulatory agencies. C. Sanitary facilities for spectators and participants at scheduled events shall consist of portable toilets (provided by a licensed commercial service), or permanent restroom facilities, or both. Wastewater from any permanent facilities provided for spectator use shall be stored in a buried holding tank of suitable capacity and subsequently removed and disposed of offsite by a licensed commercial service; or as otherwise permitted by Florida Administrative Code and approved by the appropriate local and/or State regulatory agencies. D. Onsite water well or wells may be constructed (as permitted) for flooding of the Swamp Buggy track and other non - potable uses. X DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT A. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close -out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD/DRI commitments until close -out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ - 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent— Rev. 09/15/11 Page 50 of 51 Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. CP \10- CPS - 01024 \113 Hacienda Lakes, PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Approved CCPC Consent — Rev. 09/15/11 Page 51 of 51 H m_ 2 x 0 W aw z �- o Paz Qom A�Q z a �Wa xW� �o w� �o o� U A w N U W O a a Q O¢ QQ Q� ¢z a w w a w H a M 00 a a¢ NW OQ w w H O z W D A W O a a ¢ H U a W Q �O a Q 0 �H o� H Q w H Q Ln O 0 N o F Q w w a w A C w a � U U A U d W O 0 w d �h wx CIO w� °3 3 as �w Qo � �U W � w x W Fy U ¢ O d 0 N HACIENDA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP / PLAT / BUILDING PERMIT TOTAL PROJECT RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,760 [ UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI- FAMILY] Iyj /.101b7.74WE UNITS BY GMP: 17 IN C DISTRICT 13 IN R/MU FROM C 25 IN RMU 55 MANDATED RES UNITS NON - MANDATED UNITS: 1,705 UNITS [UP TO 1,232 MAY BE MULTI - FAMILY IN ENTIRE PUD] REDUCED BY: 1. CARETAKER'S RESIDENCES IN ENTIRE PUD 2. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO RV [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS ARE DEVELOPED] 1 RES UNIT = 2.73 RV UNITS 3. UNITS USED FOR CONVERSION TO SENIOR HOUSING [UP TO 112.50 RES UNITS FOR 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IF DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL] 1 RES UNIT = 4 SENIOR HOUSING EXCEPT INDEPENDENT LIVING SINGLE FAMILY STYLE UNITS ARE 1 TO 1. AT SDP, DETERMINE WHICH MANDATED RES UNITS OR NON - MANDATED UNITS ARE MULTI- FAMILY AND WHICH ARE SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICTS THAT ALLOW RES: C DISTRICT: 17 RES UNITS (MANDATED) R DISTRICT: RMU DISTRICT: 38 UNITS (MANDATED) TO RV IN RV DISTRICT: DEDUCT: ARE DEVELOPED] TO SENIOR HOUSING: DEDUCT RESIDENTIAL] TOTAL: 1,760 CONVERSIONS: [UP TO 106 RES UNITS IF 290 RV UNITS [UP TO 112.50 IF RES UNITS ARE DERIVED FROM 3 of 5 HACIENDA LAKES PUD COMMERCIAL WORKSHEET FOR EACH SDP TOTAL PROJECT COMMERCIAL INTENSITY 327,500 RETAIL IN GROSS FLOOR AREA: 70,000 OFFICE 140,000 BP 92,000 HOTEL OF 135 ROOMS BP DISTRICT: (A) _ 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES; AND IF HOTEL BUILT HERE AND NOT IN C DISTRICT, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA FOR HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS (HOTEL CONVERSION DISAPPEARS) OR IF NO HOTEL IN BP & NO HOTEL IN C, ADD 60,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF BP USES (THIS IS HOTEL CONVERSION) OR (B) PRIVATE OR PUBLIC SCHOOL UP TO 140,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA (EXCLUDES COLLIER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT PUBLIC SCHOOLS) R /MU DISTRICT: TRACT C: UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF MEDICAL - RELATED USES [ALL USES ARE OFFICE USES EXCEPT FOR DRUG STORES AND PROPRIETORY STORES (GROUP 5912) WHICH IS RETAIL] [CHECK APPROVED RETAIL IN TRACT C -- CAN'T GO OVER 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL IN THE ENTIRE PUD] [CHECK OFFICE IN TRACT C — CAN'T GO OVER 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA IN ENTIRE PUD] 327,500 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL; 1. DEDUCT MEDICAL RETAIL APPROVED IN RMU 2. DEDUCT SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF SENIOR HOUSING NOT DERIVED FROM RESIDENTIAL UNITS [MAX 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 4 of 5 3. UP TO 81,875 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [= 25% OF TOTAL]; AND IF NO HOTEL IN BP & HOTEL CONVERSION NOT USED IN BP, ADD 92,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF HOTEL UP TO 135 ROOMS; AND 70,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE USES DEDUCT UP TO 50,000 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE IF APPROVED IN RMU DISTRICT CONVERSIONS IN TRACT C; UP TO 25% OF RETAIL CAN BE CONVERTED TO OFFICE [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO OFFICE ON A ONE -TO -ONE BASIS [UP TO 81,875 SF] RETAIL TO SF SENIOR HOUSING ON A ONE -TO -ONE BASIS [MAY HAVE 450 SENIOR HOUSING UNITS IN ENTIRE PUD] 5 of 5 a r rxn m rxn rxn m rxn rxn r'xn � Z M T 50 S o v 0 0 0 4. � b a ab x r w Tj r) m ::� cn ;o a to O M m� �� a 88 0 un M M � OH /�. �„py W LE BufFS RD CIO a a a n7 u P N a n o � o N � ti N ti y N N J v m a o N C T 50 S CD CD ll, Q �c �• COODL IRMIN �'�D VY _ - _ uRPONf LLIRC N 88 �m � � D o0 n m mz o �z � _Cf) rTl O Z > Z Z v Da m �--i r npm� n O zo roc r m ca n o N D �m� O �rz Zoe ZH O�- �� � ogo r cn DOca D M 11J r Z Z Nm V N r r � O D O mA $ t cT �A y _ - COWER BOULEVARD (CR 951) - - - - - ,� 'NEND[R50 CRE Ii I"' a9 \ < • LT .ZI �° � loll I I I I Ilir c'� I a� I c c � oa - m -1 D Tml m Z> -L Ln m O � C _ _ -- LFPL I ' FRINGE .Zm7 • A f r I� mO p D < m m O m 7D mm m 70 > OZ 'Si -- -- _ _ - (n -0 D C n C C x D - S I -1 Z Z ➢ -I Zlmi1 (n 1�1 U) ---I cT I R Dm(i I D� CD -U II cn raj z rl I s8 O N D Z m O A 0 y 5 O m 0 H T. > o O r ° W -D II o A D m z y Q N O Z cn OZ CD m0r z > I - __ J ,Q mn n m7mJ Z pZ IINN a t c \ m n Z ... nO 0 n z Zm m mcn O Ilv _ x Zm O r v \ cn ej C �a.6 r ¢ 70 Z A O c 7, c pO A m O C j D n o n 3^ 3 C °•M a m y ® >'7 g y 'Sa5` vg 7 2 Zz Z m M a m I cp0 ? A 0 m Z I g A g S n In y D I I nrdvi N n r m Z r O m D m Z O Z m C o Z C II II i °Nn 3oI� IS j iF M K N mA $ t cT �A y _ - COWER BOULEVARD (CR 951) - - - - - ,� 'NEND[R50 CRE Ii I"' a9 \ < • LT .ZI �° � loll I I I I Ilir c'� I a� I c c � oa I �ISTINU 1]D �ASE�M II�_- "yf p� _ -- LFPL I ' FRINGE III • A f r I� ac m i r 'Si �i .�0 10 v D r t am A Tl S I � Y I I _ m p. Ac II pz?m ULfi RESIDEtif4LL FRINGE RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE ;;0; .- . -. -. -. - -. DISTRICT (RFMUD) Pilo, r A y Coln Ad r u, 9 � � tj1I1I r o 9 DT-'0 m sR A AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED o O o ~ O O o 7 z z z 7 7 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z . i . i r, N N r7 A _ cT n 8. �8 cT >y m Fez rznO�zz�ZDm m� CmD�= A0= -<p�Z Nr<,r� =m Oro nr<i f�'1N N O OA oX Zr°m.0 InA� 0A°= MED2 �� N� °ZOm O N- m r m- A O D Z U C O C no m T or=-i 'I m r0 >-O" DC ➢tnAm D0Z �r TA. n, AZm ,I Z 1�>�'IO SID O_ A m�U Am�Omj {nz Ao nmZ�i rnN y�m`XZTI�m ZC OA-imD � =D mD(Anr Oran VI °rN^ cCm °r ro0w 1 D N�D�D °O Z�p�ZZDf� C° 0,Or °Om 2 Jm m0 Aom m InD � ZA m (nmmOm CO I"n �m ti° oz zcCi v'mz°y ny ci'ilSi° i ?z SAO z O °ten �r°� A�Om mNZ� Z O Z6 m n p poNOOC VSC� N_mnr<.rZO ��Z D OAOA ON Z N C A n m n< m O D Z 0 L-1 y>- z n Om D m- v W t,l p n�D tnZ OND p� o s1 Z m rZ n cn N mDD ODO 2 to mZmrA*I�rrAiz 20 z Nyo npmmC `c °moo �zozln om nA <IZm- �Tmiyz C OmZN - mD ZZ(nZZO Z Om �m _ O � O�mrmmpmA ]J OVIDAOO NCB O Z� °p O(y C m0 °"r r0 mm C n D r Ut O Z< ZNm�rA'rm�D � mti2_� Om Om OAnr<.r °mD In pSmN n0 ZZmDr C m = OSN O ID/1 O m N r o O Z VI Z ZI ~< O L-OZ y A mzDC j pN mrp U D y OO O jn mym D o D n ' D ZO CnZZmZ ~nc O n qCAa° ? 0 =m x r 0 O z O o O O n z m c AAO0 N D SC K-;; N InS SZ� O D ')mm� x D A n Z mm00 DD D ��Vlr. VO Z'm ZZ=�m N O ~D� OZ � b y m 9 Ar • -4g1 zr I"' a9 rznO�zz�ZDm m� CmD�= A0= -<p�Z Nr<,r� =m Oro nr<i f�'1N N O OA oX Zr°m.0 InA� 0A°= MED2 �� N� °ZOm O N- m r m- A O D Z U C O C no m T or=-i 'I m r0 >-O" DC ➢tnAm D0Z �r TA. n, AZm ,I Z 1�>�'IO SID O_ A m�U Am�Omj {nz Ao nmZ�i rnN y�m`XZTI�m ZC OA-imD � =D mD(Anr Oran VI °rN^ cCm °r ro0w 1 D N�D�D °O Z�p�ZZDf� C° 0,Or °Om 2 Jm m0 Aom m InD � ZA m (nmmOm CO I"n �m ti° oz zcCi v'mz°y ny ci'ilSi° i ?z SAO z O °ten �r°� A�Om mNZ� Z O Z6 m n p poNOOC VSC� N_mnr<.rZO ��Z D OAOA ON Z N C A n m n< m O D Z 0 L-1 y>- z n Om D m- v W t,l p n�D tnZ OND p� o s1 Z m rZ n cn N mDD ODO 2 to mZmrA*I�rrAiz 20 z Nyo npmmC `c °moo �zozln om nA <IZm- �Tmiyz C OmZN - mD ZZ(nZZO Z Om �m _ O � O�mrmmpmA ]J OVIDAOO NCB O Z� °p O(y C m0 °"r r0 mm C n D r Ut O Z< ZNm�rA'rm�D � mti2_� Om Om OAnr<.r °mD In pSmN n0 ZZmDr C m = OSN O ID/1 O m N r o O Z VI Z ZI ~< O L-OZ y A mzDC j pN mrp U D y OO O jn mym D o D n ' D ZO CnZZmZ ~nc O n qCAa° ? 0 =m x r 0 O z O o O O n z m c AAO0 N D SC K-;; N InS SZ� O D ')mm� x D A n Z mm00 DD D ��Vlr. VO Z'm ZZ=�m N O ~D� OZ � b y m 9 cT Ar • -4g1 9 I"' a9 \ < • LT .ZI O 9 O m U) Z D -I O ;U URMN RESIDEMIAL iRINCE (URF)- - - - - - p� U) ' FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) • 70 D r I� [A m i 3�.m3$ 'Si �i .�0 0 A > T) D A A Tl I I � Y I I cT I R 1 I 0 D cn raj z rl Imo t°A VNl D rmr� pyp pm0 m� _ m Op 1-0 < p O c 0_ n O A 0 y 5 O m 0 H n p O un c A p m cT' a tm/I pp m o A D m z y Q N O Z m A m A zx H Z Z o o z ci A M z D A �" \ N p y .4 n p In A n m D r s y 9 t r aogn� �Qa z z N c ur m A m cT Ar • -4g1 9 �0 a9 2 W m .ZI O 9 O m U) Z D -I O ;U A. p� U) i� m m • 70 D r I� [A m i 3�.m3$ 'Si �i .�0 0 ib T) D A A Tl I I I I I I I I 1 I I I D cn raj z rl Imo t°A VNl D rmr� pyp pm0 m� _ m Op 1-0 < p O c 0_ n O A 0 y 5 O m 0 H n p O un c A p m c _ m O a tm/I pp m o A D m z y Q N O Z m A m A zx H Z Z o o z ci A p f M z D A �" \ N p m D n n p In A n m D r s y (D aogn� �Qa z z N c ur m 0 r r v \ cnn� Ar • -4g1 9 �0 a9 2 W m .ZI O 9 O m U) Z D -I O ;U A. p� U) i� m m • 70 D d c m m i 3�.m3$ z c m m m 0 ib z z z z r n p m b 3 S Ng �aQ .lnl r n FN T1 Z p D G <ry<ryn<�ym �j r (m/I Z i ;U Z A O D b3° am m D m n a 7Qpa n m D r 0 (D aogn� �Qa i 0 r r D \ 1 m ej C �a.6 r ¢ 70 Z f 9 9 O C m O n 3^ 3 C °•M a m y ® >'7 g y 'Sa5` vg 7 2 m O� cp0 ? g w g S n m > Z C< nrdvi N 5 d IS j iF M K N a (n O m Z C U) F C UA m �gb 3 n n a ' m J N > °a b c p+ � b �_ o � 7 $ • r i� V Ot IV N ro V b � n. -0 D N OWD 0--- A V V A n µ O N NCA (T N 41 W OD 0)) J 0) D cJmmpmZ VIANO mmcom D o�xcnmc�m n 2oD0° ---- S Ar°.1 `� m--rmz I �-{{r°i c V� A� S A Z Z <� C m�� D j� C I = my p p nz VI NC)m pAZ- m�V10 0 COZ ➢m pOm 42C OZ P'T DOZ C_Z O 0V)lnr CO CJZ Z zo. I> pmCZ OS ZIn Z �C' zno i O O 0- =i mm � In UI VI Z CDD !n m m.. m yyD L D r1 rr Z NE m m O �m VN o C V _ f A m zy zyx I°n m�In D A 2 Z A C O O Z 1 f0N > Z mmoz°NO- or oz m -m o D AC �r Uimcm Z "Cn8Glm Or0rDr vO O Oo "mlmit�Vlln z mrO� -.0m OOAD - : A nn5o' on DOtnm Z mrID Z n n �N0 O O -A -D VoOl NOVC m ) m m W � 'Oo➢ W1 p CmIn m� m 0A V� o 1 = m°S tI zn m D N nnmSA m C Trn m D A Cm-L n�OOr� Ai o�ZNDn A mJ m m r 0 w m A O = D O � 0 A z' 0 =m o0° O ' �O =mO i m 0 J Coro C AO Am UICA OACy ZmfA*1 i °mc A m 2 5 --v, o _ c➢i D m ti° oti �cn D D m r A m m y N A O Z DAN - V A V O Q < °? ~ ~tiOCZJ Foot/ Z D D O Z S y n V _ or m p V 0 m n Z O iJ N °< L m -° m a A y Z r o VI rc�i In - {° n O m O z Z D z Z n O H O° O x m C OJ ° m o Z; Z C C C V)m Z p C D O m x A Z - C ti Z Z Z Q I_ A N§. O A N~ � O m�� to D n DDr NO _DNA ln\ j C)O N jA0 m j Z o 0 N D o0 O D O m ti A' y n p N M. 2 0 0 � A A y J O W m y 8ZOOONm O1NO CSCn �Or+Ai ?mTD O DN. C,C rrO^OC� DOZ ? � D N ZO ON DcOO�Ar m .0AO of Z No ➢ DD Z O�DZN zt, > coo n m> 0 0 mv 00 ZZx y Z D 0 N�AOD mOZ f+l A ~y0 -O O rn!n m m O m 0 Z Z O O O VI m Z �l D o.ITT.. .�lARCII. 2010 A O\ A C U7 o -0 m U W m .ZI D n i � n n sn O O O m U) Z D -I O ;U 'D 70 U) c m m m 70 D c m m i n x z c m m m c U) m 0 o m K 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -5419 r n p m 0 o 0 r n FN T1 Z p D z Z r (m/I Z i ;U Z A O D o m m D m n �_ n p Z n m D r 0 r' -0 i > r r D \ 1 m C C r 70 Z O C m O C (10 n m > D m M K a (n O m Z C U) F C UA m D > r � N � -0 D N OWD 0--- A V V A n µ O N NCA (T N 41 W OD 0)) J 0) D ' D F; FF FF Fl- FF FF FF FF 1+ �, W m n IA'' �1 rn , A rA vmi vmi vAmi umi (mn In cmn o.ITT.. .�lARCII. 2010 SL( IItP RGL Ih't' �.^ SOS 2(iE,27E (LIEST PROJGCL INC. P((,11 <T,I .F(ALE IEOEU I -= 1000 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC HACIENDA LAKES "DIATA Plug II, >OISO.020,i Visualization JIALE) r' =2000 DRARF ,,LL OVERALL MPUD/DRI CONSULTING Civil Engineering )50I500203P02 ti S..l. j\ I T 1 1 Surveying & Mapping SI I I �cc+udr)) Clll(hCL2 I► A A C��1 -' D Pi A n j MASTER t A r.7 Li 1 L L A I � � ����1 L 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 2 "1 IC U.I I. N. 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -5419 X --4 COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) iF I o 0 a g i\1 HENDERSON CREEK CANAL rnqt N - 2' -- ---- - - --- - f -NOO'Sa'21-E 344.07' _ A D ml �I m III 111 I s I I ti � ,o \ Cv L J 11 I r I11= 'O I m �m o f I I IM I A N I n x a c - m N x m C -mmJ liir N� C' A mN 1/ i 11 m M 1110 � ° I v An Zo, ti 1 w �2 I III —tn vmim ma, II MM, j ,�° I e i° �V O� �y r °�6 3 -Oi 01O ���D C m (A c rc 7� 1 s; .r I I VI me ° a " I I Iu r x - m o� \— - - -- 11 n M IIID III'< r1 N -o m7 II I III 111 D D I a n � In$ III-- III - -__ —_ EXISTING —__— 170' FPL EASEMENT — I __ ___ _____ I ____ ___ ____ _i____I I I I m g S' o 00.48.45 "E 335 ' > o SOO.4714 671.39 0 o°-D m0 - R ____ 111 __ __ ________ ___ ___ ' �:1 �- - - - `\ ;�. i•' - -- 1 o D A Z _ W �m - � 81n°�s� R B _ I$^&S?9ib n snW g7 Z V m I D- m m�Z0Z M - -- 111 Z U) AD_I a L4 a�p1 ti �C fT O CN YCO' ar 0 �n / i 0 pq III X m 1� O i N yR N F0 • - O Kamm N m m N 0 III III Mm N i I J m n N — I \\ - 3 cW \ " \ 1 / I �5 o i10> pN00� ci 3 T c < M D .° m rn m pN A' ..;1 \;I - .r� _ I r n Zmc o , mD m C D C III N00'48'1 1 "E 1341.38' D n �., ">� /� m X y m Crn m Zmc D \_�� / Ao (n '026 32' 1 A MO m X --4 9 11 v iF F 0 a g i\1 3'4 rnqt D z m n I s n \\ L \ Cv L J 11 II r X --4 9 11 v iF 0 a g 3'4 rnqt m nnna� y I n \\ L \ Cv (7 I O:�i m �m I I '� N I n x \�_� m N x m C -mmJ -�i Z a fig' "a �o M I O °, � ° I v r ti �O<p D 0 A�Nm 171 3 ,�° `a m I \\ �y r °�6 3 -Oi 01O ���D C m (A x IL �,• : 43 n ° u a " r x - qw % V V c ZmC, Cn I a n � In$ I 1 D I D D - o m g S' o - - -- -- > o SOO.4714 671.39 0 o°-D m0 N R • g f� 1 o D A Z _ W �m - � 81n°�s� R B _ I$^&S?9ib n snW g7 Z V I D- m m�Z0Z M + C/J a L4 a�p1 ti �C fT O CN YCO' ar 0 ppZ v�p 1� Ic I g i pq V X m Oi i N yR N V • - O Kamm N m m N 0 _ m J — I \\ - cl o m- C) �5 p pN00� ci 3 T M D vyC m rn m pN A' Fn X n \ N I m I D y I n \\ L \ Cv (7 I O:�i m �m I I '� N I n x \�_� m N x m C -mmJ -�i Z M I O °, � ° I v ti �O<p D 0 A�Nm 171 �„ c ,�° `a m I \\ �y r I -Oi 01O ���D C m (A V V o?Z ZmC, Cn I o I I 1 D I D D - o m \ ---- (Y n - - -- -- > o SOO.4714 671.39 0 o°-D m0 O fOn iii 1 o D m� Z _ W �m - � _ Z V I D- m m�Z0Z M C/J o ti f \, o n `\ m� ar 0 ppZ v�p OO A Z Z __ l In I n I / \ A �O r I - O Kamm N m m N 0 _ m — I \\ - o m- C) p = fT p M D vyC m rn m pN A' Fn X mD m D Crn m Zmc Or*I <�� 00 p (n 1 A MO m f Tl r I T I ` / < O° z z o rn _ z, z �I Ul II 00 �� v �� °vv 4 i �n. o I �I Z�F 1_ —_ - -_ URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE (URF) _ � � W N RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) In I� �.: O 2 12Z : r- ,D Om�- n D� omD SAD b *O� sAO °o I 00 - - ,ice Z ..v> 1' _m - - y Z11 D ;0 m x _ r y c � y sag> Iz T7 D Z1 O Zxc °0 17C> '° Zmc v�y,00 <Y to 00c ° fy Ox� DDC� oD�zm i [T1 D <� Im D 71 m m 17171 -i Z s> y ADD © ©D a A I < N m < N00'38'S0 "E 1 345.26' S00'41'44 "W 2707.07' m m N 500'38 51 "W 500'38'50'14 672 63' 0 0 0 1345.10' �z1 .. - D C Z D M O o r1 7 7 7 7 O r ( 1 b m Ox s u it zn> r,,,I m l J S00'3502 672.97 S00'35'02"W 1345.93' A, AGRICULTURE A. AGRICULTURE �IC 7 UNDEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED � , Tye -: o -I. I I I I p l Z I I G I D oT < O I A W m D m 00 O O r 3 Z�jO <� Zlnm m r �DO (m/1 c Ul D ? o O D m m fTl 0N� r 600'36'2314 2701.30' o °n ° m p < Z D O-Z-{{ p t*�1t0 �a <N m m i o$vo =lCn O O Z ➢ D O r 0 z r< C r AD M ° D O m O m Dm i f Tl Z I z _ V) Or U) m I -1 D > _ ill Z D Vm1 f�T1 m 1 U) 0 om 0,7;7 O ° M Z U D m f�l D VI O D 7<1 n (7 m '�i1 = Z f*1 m m fTl Z Z m O V1 I n Z p D A N N M cn A m O z y�x y m Z r < D D \ Z N m D m 0Z M D I 1`1 O O 0 o T] \ ° Z fr1 O Z I M C m N 71 I om m cn ::I < = m 9 m MARCH 2010 SLC PW'P, RGL Ir i11 I 105 16627E ('LMT. PROJECT, INC. HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC. HACIENDA LAKES Plug ��"X JA os�ISO.o1.oi ("0 LLI - 300 Visualization rrrr 50. nlRAVv 600 W DR-1W 7I7 LL: And jD/DRI CONSULTING Civil Engineering o�olsoolosr'os 1 /s „/. S IVIr lJ MPUD�D pI � \ T 11 1 Surveying &Mapping Sul !'I It 118111? C IILC ,LU: /�A CT�i R PLAN MASTER 1 L 6610 Willow Park Drive. Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 3 or IC U.H. \'. .J L 6 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -& I � I -1K*C . T =i= =OS m -- - -- 'v = mmzin Z =0 ►Sy -z> m�z�Dmr�� Oar -V1 V1 O1m m I I I I I NO I Z ZD I DeYC '� In A A �- A 0 D A m 00 �p -�D ADA I A A O m D A O c 0 S N Z m OC r Mm O n r D W m m Z A cn m O O O O N 3 D Z 3 TI O D A Im, 0 A r_ to m z Z A Z A D O Or Z Z A A A -_I D (Dj Z D D �� O� S 0 < +Ci A�D AmpZ N D ° m 0 O O Cr �O �ym0 m m m 0 z (n O m D r D -t D z m _I A G7 D m to O 0 Z _° y r<Tt 00 Z C A Z D �A m� �m pm0 r0 0 zDO r� u10 m n D A n m Ozm AmA p m r o r Z 1�1 ° D D 0 m m A = z < Z m 0 (n Z m Z 7 m > 0 D p -4 (n A 0 S D -1 X D rn m m T D -I D — r A m O D - N (zi1OA . =nm m rOr1 ��0 A D M D z 0 m�- m A ° Z N OZ o Z 0 O z r A N �E A I Z m D !n < AO AO Ep 0 2 m D ° z m D I - NI COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) A A HENDERSON CR EK CANAL N00'S1'S4 "E 956.27'D D �m-�c� I I I Azco m II !ICU i D Oo omz°° II I I I _ I 1 A m 4 v II z1 D om> I m3 IImU s � �A� g j Caz °o c�zc wl j om° zip l I mm� II N Jf� 3na 3 m� ° °>y n o �m10 °— I - �fm m� mn m m A z ; o n II - - -� o A �CA'0 ffi � - I r � • II .m czi 0 Ir Y 6 —II p r m _N01'01.15 -E 1699.99' A uOm °p X x I1 _ - - L� I D J— — — — � t - -- _ EXISTING 170' FPL EASEMENT L- 6x.31' sorol'1s w { 1 EXISTING 170' I 1 FPL EASEMENT mm 1 r rr + 4 4 v v - -0 O I m3 Nfll 3 a g c�zc zip me II A I 3na 3 3 S mmo n o o m - - ----1 zza ; ; o o - - -� o A �CA'0 ffi � � Y m 0 A � • • Y Y v 0 Ir Y 6 - -� p r m _N01'01.15 -E 1699.99' x ' .�', I . I ,.i.I _ - - z 0 O C I D D w — ,,a ss. S Ss. . mm L- A (y .. I ( I: n r z mm 1 r rr + 4 4 v v - -0 O I m3 O 3 a me a e X3 3 3na 3 3 S \ °° n o o m m z z z zza ; ; o o C� a a N f ffi � � Y S n � • • Y Y v v W Y Y 6 - -� 1 % o >Ci � �'o.a� o _ - - -- - ------ - - - o i i I I a ss. S Ss. . m� /-- I __ / -- — 1 I - �a'�v _.,.. A �` wpm II n u 3 3 q - -- n $ $ S S? 5 5 A, AGRICULTURE q e n � - UNDEVEL PED o a9 ; ;n.6 t t 3 3 0 0 2 2 m m r z m I N m m 81\ F 38"E 0Tk X \ \ / — --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- // D ID �, - - - - - \\ \ d vv\ 1 \\ O v \\ \1111 I A o zzf m v v v \I Z I z \ r- u*3. .,- ga nom= I I \ 1 ' m rm on 1yM"���'yyy� "d S - -�' - - - - - -� ------------ (mr� z - / - -\ / I _�: / / a.�r s.;� �y amD - �I ADD ©DD App m7 I' ::`/ i m ml mD F �c URBAN RESIDENTIAL \ 2 ;, ;.`, I . j FRINGE (URF) �_�� — ib�> RC ° ° ° ° RURAL FRINGE MIXED � A� -- _ - -- 7 y 7 USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) - y Y a `/ a w m i' I. i m m m m A, Olt- xT Az / 1\ A � o \ — i I! Iy�y 500'42'40 "W 1344.51' ^5 C \\\ m — I /.t C z mm I \ 1 .// ,I �c m� I/ A «// / �� J7 - - - _ 0 o / � -S - iVV4 5.133HS 33S 3N1� H� SEC ] IVP, R('C, CLIENT PROJECT INC. 11ARCH, 2010 1'-id.A +/ '' SOti 2fiC.27C DIATA 015.0 SCALE HACIENDA LAKES OFNAPLES, LLC HACIENDA LAKES Planning i Ali fion o5olso.o2.a3 rrIDI u-coo (HALjI 1 " =600' DRa1 +\ HILL ]�/IPUD /SRI CONSULTING Civil Engineering 05015002031"04 M 5 1 /f� ����� AL T T 1 j Surveying in SillIIAUINI_H- CIJUNLD: ��/� Y g Mapping MASTERPLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 5970578 4 nr 1 f D.H.K. 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -5419 v mo yy I m3 me pm a \ °° m m - E - -� 1 _ - - -- - ------ - - - � mA 0 zm I y � s m� /-- I __ / -- — 1 I - �a'�v _.,.. A �` wpm II II - -- A, AGRICULTURE � - UNDEVEL PED N00'68'00 "E 2683.32' r z m I N m m 81\ F 38"E 0Tk X \ \ / — --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- // D ID �, - - - - - \\ \ d vv\ 1 \\ O v \\ \1111 I A o zzf m v v v \I Z I z \ r- u*3. .,- ga nom= I I \ 1 ' m rm on 1yM"���'yyy� "d S - -�' - - - - - -� ------------ (mr� z - / - -\ / I _�: / / a.�r s.;� �y amD - �I ADD ©DD App m7 I' ::`/ i m ml mD F �c URBAN RESIDENTIAL \ 2 ;, ;.`, I . j FRINGE (URF) �_�� — ib�> RC ° ° ° ° RURAL FRINGE MIXED � A� -- _ - -- 7 y 7 USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) - y Y a `/ a w m i' I. i m m m m A, Olt- xT Az / 1\ A � o \ — i I! Iy�y 500'42'40 "W 1344.51' ^5 C \\\ m — I /.t C z mm I \ 1 .// ,I �c m� I/ A «// / �� J7 - - - _ 0 o / � -S - iVV4 5.133HS 33S 3N1� H� SEC ] IVP, R('C, CLIENT PROJECT INC. 11ARCH, 2010 1'-id.A +/ '' SOti 2fiC.27C DIATA 015.0 SCALE HACIENDA LAKES OFNAPLES, LLC HACIENDA LAKES Planning i Ali fion o5olso.o2.a3 rrIDI u-coo (HALjI 1 " =600' DRa1 +\ HILL ]�/IPUD /SRI CONSULTING Civil Engineering 05015002031"04 M 5 1 /f� ����� AL T T 1 j Surveying in SillIIAUINI_H- CIJUNLD: ��/� Y g Mapping MASTERPLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 5970578 4 nr 1 f D.H.K. 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -5419 3 ` 7 w l`J EMU N' A 133HS 33S — 3N1_1 HD1dW S00 �� 26 32 W 1703.00 _ - --------- ----- - -- - -- A, AGRICULTURE - - -- '' ' col a o g _ SINGLE – FAMILY HOMES AND 0 m m 11ILL: MPUD/DRI NO1'04'11 -E v 2052.01 z PRIVATE NURSERY USES MPUD�DI I o .fur 111;111R Z 1�r � D I ° c➢i "� � � D m 0 f Y VI ... Or m I Z iiM m <C mD 2 L c C I ���=Z D O=mm= m I 0 0 z m r D A R Or 0 1n =i0 pCrZD W mZ =mcm s °m z'm>c)m zrOF,cnn e ' - � I m t �jz�z O 0 - �m z0 zmc G. 9 86' NO Z77 O= O D p Z D O I ��~ ���• � - -' _�� ~���- �.���.�. - •1368.25 ' 00'5624 "E 4 500'5629 �"1t'�`��+`L` ��y�+��+• I m 8 X0 o �. 4. � I m z p<(znm D O D 70 c° v m Z X m0 gm > --I z 0cn 00 K> z p Z AA ° O 0o m A� vm 0 y 0 o c�� m I 0 Dzcf' A in I I a ?> cz D> S '., o m > V7 »� a Z D O1� O _ 0 M m N mn�y m ".� ^ mC d m U • I " Up � .. - yz m 3 0 T pm m + JAI 1, 8 p i _ N O i_0 N N u oo N jp SOO'40'10"W - 1361.17' ai?yiX Cj if R rS yyb n v C ?> Z D ° 0 Z7 m0 O� U C m I - -- C D Z D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 <Z OC m C °m b ` 7 w l`J EMU N' A I I .�..�.r.. S00 �� 26 32 W 1703.00 _ - --------- ----- - -- - -- m m m L.�i ➢ A -0 Ac�m col a o g _ I 0 m m 11ILL: MPUD/DRI nn m z 050r00203P05 `U MPUD�DI I o .fur 111;111R Z m D I ° c➢i "� � � D m 0 f Y VI ... Or m I Z iiM m <C mD 2 L c C I ���=Z D O=mm= m I I - -- C D Z D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 <Z OC m C °m b 0 EMU \ I I ZD I I I I *f m m m I I ➢ A -0 Ac�m FU (EOLUI1 =300' o <c➢i1 I I u, 11 m m 11ILL: MPUD/DRI nn m m 050r00203P05 `U MPUD�DI I o .fur 111;111R D Zm Omo 0 D I Am "� � � D m w N � I f Y VI O Z• D °mA I Z iiM Z Z�G7 <C mD 2 L c C I ���=Z D O=mm= m r 0 z m r D A R Or 0 1n =i0 pCrZD W mZ =mcm s °m z'm>c)m zrOF,cnn e ' - � I m n 3 �jz�z O 0 - �m z0 zmc G. 9 9' 9' p �p NO Z77 O= O D p Z D O I N m €� 90 D D m C° D UC) — °�mz°r m C X0 o �. � m z p<(znm D O D 70 c° v > --I z 0cn 00 K> z p Z AA ° m A� vm 0 0 o c�� m 0 Dzcf' A in I I I - -- C D Z D O 0 0 0 0 0 0 <Z OC m C °m b 0 EMU \ I I ZD I I I I HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC m m m < D <� ➢ A -0 Ac�m FU (EOLUI1 =300' o <c➢i1 �m0 m 1A I u, 11 m m 11ILL: MPUD/DRI nn m m 050r00203P05 °° MPUD�DI I r y .fur 111;111R D Zm Omo 0 D OW Am U. H.,N. 0 z 2 <Zm ➢ X a O - z O Z Z�G7 S I I I I I I I I I I --A � 'Tcn I n n NIAI?(II.1010 SL( 111P HGL 1?' JOS26E.27E CLIENT PROJG(CT- INC. S(ALE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC HACIENDA LAKES ° a FU (EOLUI1 =300' ViSu�tion I u, 11 n 11ILL: MPUD/DRI CONSULTING Civil Engineering 050r00203P05 °° MPUD�DI I ,& %6. 1 T l 1 Surveying in �g g .fur 111;111R UILCILD p MASTER PLAN g 'X $ " 16 U. H.,N. 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX (239) 278 -5419 a s 40 e FL og g� n 3 c. 0 G. 9 9' 9' p �p 3' � m €� 90 R 0 C m �. � d N a »� a d ®o 5 N d m U • S" 4= " Up � io + JAI 1, 8 p o M Jqj _ N O i_0 N N u oo N jp ai?yiX Cj if R rS yyb n v N N p � �mp ♦ 00 8 � P V I r V + ~� !,F ad A 3 Ne 8 Am.a°g.o 9 I I I I I I I I I I --A � 'Tcn I n n NIAI?(II.1010 SL( 111P HGL 1?' JOS26E.27E CLIENT PROJG(CT- INC. S(ALE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC HACIENDA LAKES �j� Plug 0 0150.020.3 FU (EOLUI1 =300' ViSu�tion I u, 11 ar,�i n r• =soo' DRAW\ 11ILL: MPUD/DRI CONSULTING Civil Engineering 050r00203P05 nrs.L MPUD�DI I ,& %6. 1 T l 1 Surveying in �g g .fur 111;111R UILCILD p MASTER PLAN L 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597.0576 $ " 16 U. H.,N. 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX (239) 278 -5419 269313' (D) U N89 12 25 E 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7? C D Z n i s i M; SCI Orl mcl f �mI n I Z I I I I o �I I I — m N a � I o ? 0 m I 0 0 c o n ;'' A? 2 O 6 5 ° LA at 4 3 Y o o v$ o < 9Qm�3o rian m m n n£ m e z z z z n � � C u o w�N wmli ry�ryg � y a f� S_ O cl p V N 6 C y 6 O o zs� 8 � rs. n 3 3 • n N ei $TC °B N _c v w w y�y JAI 1. 1 F d a Y U V oN N O N N T O 9 O t,Ru� O N E 3 1R u A m 1.R ♦ V A cn 14 Z A n T onx am_ >T� m z�uo DUDEz I I - m m mEn ZJ O m I C ;0 U) <((n > �Ns W m r < aI ,N> n O M �+) m r�* O p rr, p 7>: m frl D m zz zm N S > D m Z D 2 r D m p0G) ;0 0 Z --A m O V) = m n 111 Su Ilt'P, RGL CLIL \T PROJL(CT \LARCH 2010 ' 1 o0ti 26F..2iE INC. S( 1LL HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. DXX �� Planning 050180.0204 (FULLI 00 1 HACIENDA LAKES Visualization (1 rALF) 1' 600' DRA tV,"; HILL MPUp /p�� j� CONSULTING Civil Engineering 0501500203POG' N IS I MP UD�Dl L I 1 < T 11 Surveying & Mapping =m 11 �cnutl e LJ IL(hLO: MASTER A TER PLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 G nr 16 D. I.N. l V �!"1 �J G 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278.5419 MATCH LINE — SEE SHEET 4 M MATCH LINE — SEE SHEET 5 NOT PART O OF THIS PROJECT Ij � �� 5 5 T1YMYl 13565 c I I I Ajm ° ° o ° I� f S�n.�1,1 s s�5 nnl r� r C C m fZ*+1�� S ni <� S Sn �1�cn r rC . .to'045 m m'(� R �i C '.,I ""� %7 z ° ° m me ° � C CIS m m - z 1 Z Zen ryO. "�N . ..J.. � S8�07''2+0�" .2.7�26. . 50' ...�Q. r N N N N N — — _ N87'07'13 "E 1704.07- _- - - - - -- S S87- 07'13"W 807.16' m m�o [1 _ W o I� I I o �i E E z z� t ° °N D D N N Ii b b Z Z c �D3o =zxx :Lc, —L ' m <A z _ D D I I D o O O r D D z D m r 1 c n m m i i C7 D o rn 0 0C U z Z 0 z _ o� < III r <A � � z I r r D I 1 1 A �D I me v vc, o mo –��o�r m m c $ $ i I o o� � �o -z o ZD I 15 - I < "E 1 <ln r'�r D C0D�1 Cp z - N88'56'54 " (M) D O '1 O O U) z m O - S Z p Z 0 I ( (n 171 0�7 I I J JL O >z� cn I ,I i I I o oo m j ° ° _ __ I I J J i > s o oU) E Em D C " o; roc me 0;13 rn ~o : : S S89'15'59 -E 1823.18' (M) NB 6-34-W 1822.92' (D) A Nm I I ' I 00 I I i ii Z 1 I I � � I F x A T ti , z i t tv z z CD I I. o ozmzm Z D I ° I I C C I I. I i o me °m os I I I I m m m �N m m ADD © ©® z i�, I L L I II 8 A 2 2 m y ° ° ) ) J JI o o m N "1 GI o i to i..�• �.. ' '.�.'.�..�.' � �..J:...�..�.�..�..L. r�•... r r1» I. L....'.. ri. i... .r.•�.r�•.i..�...r.'•�»�...� «� N m F, W m - -- 5 W 2 58911 Oi W 2693.80 M) 589 09 39 W 2693.18' (M) 0 01 U N89 12 25 E 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 7 7? C D Z n i s i M; SCI Orl mcl f �mI n I Z I I I I o �I I I — m N a � I o ? 0 m I 0 0 c o n ;'' A? 2 O 6 5 ° LA at 4 3 Y o o v$ o < 9Qm�3o rian m m n n£ m e z z z z n � � C u o w�N wmli ry�ryg � y a f� S_ O cl p V N 6 C y 6 O o zs� 8 � rs. n 3 3 • n N ei $TC °B N _c v w w y�y JAI 1. 1 F d a Y U V oN N O N N T O 9 O t,Ru� O N E 3 1R u A m 1.R ♦ V A cn 14 Z A n T onx am_ >T� m z�uo DUDEz I I - m m mEn ZJ O m I C ;0 U) <((n > �Ns W m r < aI ,N> n O M �+) m r�* O p rr, p 7>: m frl D m zz zm N S > D m Z D 2 r D m p0G) ;0 0 Z --A m O V) = m n 111 Su Ilt'P, RGL CLIL \T PROJL(CT \LARCH 2010 ' 1 o0ti 26F..2iE INC. S( 1LL HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. DXX �� Planning 050180.0204 (FULLI 00 1 HACIENDA LAKES Visualization (1 rALF) 1' 600' DRA tV,"; HILL MPUp /p�� j� CONSULTING Civil Engineering 0501500203POG' N IS I MP UD�Dl L I 1 < T 11 Surveying & Mapping =m 11 �cnutl e LJ IL(hLO: MASTER A TER PLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 G nr 16 D. I.N. l V �!"1 �J G 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278.5419 c o n ;'' A? 2 O 6 5 ° LA at 4 3 Y o o v$ o < 9Qm�3o rian m m n n£ m e z z z z n � � C u o w�N wmli ry�ryg � y a f� S_ O cl p V N 6 C y 6 O o zs� 8 � rs. n 3 3 • n N ei $TC °B N _c v w w y�y JAI 1. 1 F d a Y U V oN N O N N T O 9 O t,Ru� O N E 3 1R u A m 1.R ♦ V A cn 14 Z A n T onx am_ >T� m z�uo DUDEz I I - m m mEn ZJ O m I C ;0 U) <((n > �Ns W m r < aI ,N> n O M �+) m r�* O p rr, p 7>: m frl D m zz zm N S > D m Z D 2 r D m p0G) ;0 0 Z --A m O V) = m n 111 Su Ilt'P, RGL CLIL \T PROJL(CT \LARCH 2010 ' 1 o0ti 26F..2iE INC. S( 1LL HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. DXX �� Planning 050180.0204 (FULLI 00 1 HACIENDA LAKES Visualization (1 rALF) 1' 600' DRA tV,"; HILL MPUp /p�� j� CONSULTING Civil Engineering 0501500203POG' N IS I MP UD�Dl L I 1 < T 11 Surveying & Mapping =m 11 �cnutl e LJ IL(hLO: MASTER A TER PLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 G nr 16 D. I.N. l V �!"1 �J G 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278.5419 onx am_ >T� m z�uo DUDEz I I - m m mEn ZJ O m I C ;0 U) <((n > �Ns W m r < aI ,N> n O M �+) m r�* O p rr, p 7>: m frl D m zz zm N S > D m Z D 2 r D m p0G) ;0 0 Z --A m O V) = m n 111 Su Ilt'P, RGL CLIL \T PROJL(CT \LARCH 2010 ' 1 o0ti 26F..2iE INC. S( 1LL HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. DXX �� Planning 050180.0204 (FULLI 00 1 HACIENDA LAKES Visualization (1 rALF) 1' 600' DRA tV,"; HILL MPUp /p�� j� CONSULTING Civil Engineering 0501500203POG' N IS I MP UD�Dl L I 1 < T 11 Surveying & Mapping =m 11 �cnutl e LJ IL(hLO: MASTER A TER PLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 G nr 16 D. I.N. l V �!"1 �J G 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278.5419 n 111 Su Ilt'P, RGL CLIL \T PROJL(CT \LARCH 2010 ' 1 o0ti 26F..2iE INC. S( 1LL HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. DXX �� Planning 050180.0204 (FULLI 00 1 HACIENDA LAKES Visualization (1 rALF) 1' 600' DRA tV,"; HILL MPUp /p�� j� CONSULTING Civil Engineering 0501500203POG' N IS I MP UD�Dl L I 1 < T 11 Surveying & Mapping =m 11 �cnutl e LJ IL(hLO: MASTER A TER PLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 G nr 16 D. I.N. l V �!"1 �J G 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278.5419 e I I MATCH LINE — SEE SHEET 5 I I I I I I I a s x I I O I I ms D Z Z S S= N= C cf) fTl p D= D O °= mr7� mmWm�v = Z=— cW Z° mN n n n n. 0 , omac OOZCmD DmmCN D � Z m m DOmr R ,030 n me Z � rr m Z 0 mM Y m MU � Z oZ =M, M ° _ m ^ rM ` cx N ;�; C (n > -D vz- vXr� ;0c °nKW� °� O o A rNi frTl z Z: � M AOOr =OZ o m ZO D lip m-3 OZW13- �� �z <V)mrD nDM C°Z I I 6t ro o � �O rD on �- DZ Z ° m m _ I if 5go 0 6 '.. it o m iF 'I J rn z z° >zn m CA .� Z a3a�'o .4. a� b �mrm 'C oN W rYi zs•o s9' --- - - - - -- lo t0 O ��% A, AGRICULTURE _ D 0 Om ZZ �Z 8 UNDEVELOPED z m 3. f'A'1 o I � w v 3 I C7 r Z M M M °d a3aa� I I I I I I Z I O v a A, AGRICULTURE =�3g � cf) fTl p o n n n n� a ,030 n me N89'57'581 2200.53' i mM ;1" n> m ZZZ¢ _ m f;g S89'46'1 2W 356.23' (n m U) O o A rNi frTl M LO m-3 5��m 6t n �O Y 39s c�p 5go (D FL 6 it iF 3 D °M0 .� Z a3a�'o .4. a� b �mrm 'C D 3 ��% m e D 0 Om ZZ �Z 8 m 3. f'A'1 y—�� o A g m irTi � ! En <'� m n v 3 n3 zx �o ZM Du)X D 0. "4 X P m m a ��o C' oC 20 n N r 1 nom, m r �DDDD® � A N m m v v l Z 0 C)zz A A A A m m z o v v v v N89'23'00'E 364.14' N89'22'35 "E 710.09' N89'22'35E 355.05' S69'22'35'1Yi T M � Z °�' m cn 355 OS' A�� a n A 2! i "' O � • M In o A N N jp A Z z z N Z z � I = F<rl M J r.. �... r.,.. �.. �... �.. �.. �•...... �_.. a_ �. w. �.. r.. rrr.. �•. � .�.r..�..r «r..�,+r..J..r.•�..rl .� »�..�. .. r:. r.. �.. � ` I I I f HA r.• 589'11'16"W 2906.24 I S89'10'42W 2835.68' \I Z A D C m ti I m 0 m 5 A < _A M C oC U e I I I I I I Z I > A, AGRICULTURE Eli i Aral cf) fTl UNDEVELOPED I m UNDEVELOPED I N89'57'581 2200.53' i mM ;1" n> N89'57'58 "E 2497.82' _ I S89'46'1 2W 356.23' (n m U) O o A rNi frTl M LO W I 70 M �O nD o�^mp "' m _ 5go A (n D °M0 .� Z M � o r �,' b �mrm 'C D I m e D 0 Om ZZ A71 m N89'34'43"E 365.01 f'A'1 y—�� o A g m irTi � ! En <'� m n > ZM Du)X D X W w N ��o C' oC 20 n N r 1 nom, m r �DDDD® A N m m m ° l Z 0 C)zz A A A A m m z o v v v v N89'23'00'E 364.14' N89'22'35 "E 710.09' N89'22'35E 355.05' S69'22'35'1Yi T M � Z °�' m cn 355 OS' _ m 7 o000a 7 7 � cn m M In o = M Z z z N Z z f*l I = F<rl M J r.. �... r.,.. �.. �... �.. �.. �•...... �_.. a_ �. w. �.. r.. rrr.. �•. � .�.r..�..r «r..�,+r..J..r.•�..rl .� »�..�. .. r:. r.. �.. � ` I I I f ..`.. r.. r.• 589'11'16"W 2906.24 I A, AGRICULTURE I i A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED I m UNDEVELOPED N89'57'581 2200.53' i z , m rn a ' N89'57'58 "E 2497.82' I S89'46'1 2W 356.23' 356.23' N89'46'12"E 356.23' 5ZD ° _ 5go A (n .� M C7 ro C o r �,' b �mrm 'C D m e o x o .� o " ~ m o m N89'34'43"E 365.01 f'A'1 y—�� o A g m irTi � ! En <'� m n $ "�•� m >� C W w N ��o C' oC 20 1 nom, m r �DDDD® A N m m m ° l v�N._ =�f A A A A m m z o v v v v N89'23'00'E 364.14' N89'22'35 "E 710.09' N89'22'35E 355.05' S69'22'35'1Yi T 0 0 0 0 0 355 OS' 7 o000a 7 7 M In o Z z z N Z z �.. ��. i. .��.�..r..r..l...�..�..�a..r•Q. r.. �... r.,.. �.. �... �.. �.. �•...... �_.. a_ �. w. �.. r.. rrr.. �•. � .�.r..�..r «r..�,+r..J..r.•�..rl .� »�..�. .. r:. r.. �.. �.. �.. ` f ..`.. r.. r.• 589'11'16"W 2906.24 O c�I K S89'10'42W 2835.68' \I Z N D C m ti I m °� A < _A M C oC U e °M M I \i � 'M ° o m Z m I I VI 1R(II, 2011 1 psi 5Oc 26E,27E (LILNT PROJECT INC. 9k 15002 s( ALE (HALF 1 = 300' HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC. HACIENDA LAKES ��� TA Planning 0 01.70.02 na Visualization ° nrAEn 1 DRa11N -600 �7 �r+� p TIILL MrVLJ /DILL CONSULTING Civil Engineering 0,10 1 .00203P07 M aT MP I ,,.& IL T T A JL Surveying g & Mapping 11t t(w1:?11" + (IIL(KLI) V1 7 I Ep n LA V U��D 578 610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX:(239) 597 -0 _ D1N. 1542 Carson Street, For Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 5224 FAX. 19 (239) 278 -54 I 1 yyyy; A J ♦ ' L J m m m N( \ III m i l \ \` a� \ f b m mom m I 1 N x r Soa 47 , d '„mo i N r I `� III `, o �\ a o I 0 o -,P'4137 ,611.1 1 t°-,+'% COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951)i_o - ' III — HENDERSON CREEK CANAL — — +;'' 0s 4. v o s.o,- N0I 0'S0 '27 'E 3$.�� �07' — — — -- -N-- -- - - -1 - — — of III II - t °II IIII= ° A �R° cD m r ��, NN i cD + 'vN / �I ag1 + °1 I I , ^o I ZD °� m0 o II10 III U x—D oD m� of f I.., I l u s I Or 1nrNi I mn m 1 ` -I �-a a I 111u) I �� c� or .v �� i� I I I �, °m > III I I Am T7 O I I I D III -< A t ty m Iv s<o as v al I m.s -0 Oz - O m� III---------------------- `'' '� A � :E 0 — - - -- 1I I EXISTING - - - - -- .d '! ------- +:� - - - - -i — a o cmn A I I I 170' FPL EASEMENT �I ------------ 0 +,o '48'45 "E +4 _______ r m N r III -------- - - - - 335 -� a O �_z 0Om n m b mN n m 0mD A z X m r III z D O m O Z O '3 cl III z A O o III III o v ., :'i! I FE 3 ro D _— - - - - -LI cow \\ / 9 I m �0 C�?7 O m Z C G Z m n D m c n� 0, O C7 s n -'7 / %/ sl i ?.. m� D<� Z m O c .� . +,JS +os�N00'48'l0 � 1341.38'ea + / ` / vZ1 D m X fm In O c Z = 0 r N m cm m I 1 yyyy; A J ♦ ' L J m m m N( \ III m i l \ \` a� \ f b m mom m I 1 N x r Soa 47 , d '„mo i N r I `� III `, o �\ a o I 0 o -,P'4137 ,611.1 1 t°-,+'% m� '9 m p l I I I I 1 z 1 ZD I > I I I Am N T7 O < N W A -U � D -0 Oz - O m� D mD `'' '� -9 � :E 0 co D m z o� _� cmn A m0 D r m N r > D Z O �_z 0Om n m b mN n m 0mD A z X m r zD 1n r D D O m O Z O '3 cl r�O D m A O m fTl >;u mm C�?7 O m Z C G Z m n D 0, O C7 ;0 Z X C 0 Z m O c m D O D cn --I (7 X fm In O c Z = 0 r N m cm m m z 3>1 m 0 m m O < O rail z z m t m M < m II o m a s I m I I z URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE (URF) a RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) O O m C i...Amoom �M, Q n� 0 3z 9 s + a +° �m "zA 9 _ cad 3D� °z<D cn r s z Zr� =Ns ^.� ,TJ Zrc 0 c) C s Iz m 'ITS c� DX� D�<> 17 Dn� CDC m(7 rm DDS ads Aim N� I X�m o <0 - + +- i '+ N00'38'50 "E 1345.26' I 500'41'46"W 2707.07' 500'3851"W + 5 88'50 6 63a °� 134510 li 'so C D s Z D z m m n s a A ° o n i r I Ii r A m o o m O 7 7 7 O� s mC o o ! z n n f�r1 n m m /. s s s m > � + S00'35'02"w 1345.93' A AGRICULTURE A, AGRICULTURE UNDEVELOPED o UNDEVELOPED C V v n rri �z W N n�c»ZVlC v ! m �o z zm DOmmm p D TI Z m 0 Z r = m VINO' —`OD �TImmZ I ( = m C m c D r 0 om70mD�m�OrOmD o z Soo'36'23"w 2701.30' ,ilco ZN F Vmizm� fTl A�r c D m m 0 m m p m D 0 - n c D zo O F O m o O p r I ° D �J O = Z O m Z C I y D C- OZmm' oD > i s in D m z z O� 0 K D m r.Z'JOOp nm m Om z I —c: O m �� Z 01 I m C Z 0 c, N 0 m O .13 ➢ z o1 (n m I g m � 8 � I 1> rr SL( IIt'P- RGL-.- (LILVT PROIRT rWARO( X010 I1 r -�LC'� 50S 26L.27L INC.P1aIlI11II 050150.0203 (FULL 100 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LL HACIENDA LAKES ��� �� Visualization IIIALL) 1-600 " r' D11A W,1 MPUD /DRI CONCEPTUAL p CONSULTING Civil Engineering 0 015002(><RPOU MP UD�Dl L I 1 \ 1 11 i Surveying & Mapping w r i �'cnlnrx: (.IIL ,U) WATER 7� if A 1� I i1 G � /f 1-' 1`\ IT PLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive. Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 3 or 16 D.H.N. 1 VIl-11 t`-1 11 / I G 1 V 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -5479 r I I I I NOE HE I I I I I m I Z I > I I I m = 1 D _U m U1 c m (n Z Z m m r D A ;13 O m Z m A O Z m C) p O r UI A n c A m A m m Z Dr O n r N m nA � A m 0 Z D r y O c- c A p m W A m A m m -I (� O m A O y -� D O -I D > 771 O Z A n A O O ') Z A vmi V) (1) A O <� mOZ D D r r �7 L7 m m o c m r<r1A m(A G) -i -9 O D O m Z Z x Z m ° = � x D m O G7 n r � m m < m m O AO A ccn m < Z m A A < m m n m Z I I I I I HENDERSON CR EK CANAL I I I I I D> A c D K: W Z ;00 rm=_ o - -c C mZ r ' r( M-U I D NIm D Z O(A O K m ° c r A O Z p Z < A dam II m� °mvmi0 - - - - -- m M70 I Zm f V�m7 - I �z �WZ D x n 3 +� ` "'s + +s ' °�. 1 1 *J �Yr ' a� \ \\\., +',: \ P° r ,+ 9s II oz ° C y - °° m r r + )'31 �: Z O o9 (n a, - S tbNDEVEL PED +, "N00'48 -------- 00 "E 2683.�T2° v _ _____ _____ m / - l #,per +/ \ x 1� e \ \ m N V + N01'14'38 67575 ' so m `I --- , — — I Z r \ - `.°Ra';: / i A - -- '� 1 +x \ � --= -�.�r" - vu,§e,Tl I /— - - - -- -yc�� -_Z r ( pia -� `its � Y i .� �Iy� �n✓ S,X .� \��� T' __ oz � 1 -. 67s.6 z $ o , i -- f ... •• .rr.......r....i . r. .`l r - - - - - m ° v m � n 9 +' m c m A o - a ��! r x' 'e V, U) cn 1 mo m f_ m ° + + + �♦CV�r1�'' + ° m 9 � �,,' , ' i, w• / � C tr � � ` ti,� \ + I � . - - I * + ^' µ � aO f�'� CrJ 'TJ + URBAN RESIDENTIAL z �'i / i� +, + ++ ' +. r IT A p FRINGE (URF)_ ��.� _ I - -c.y i ° +_ J c°c ? RURAL FRINGE MIXED ti:�'S.���...��� +� USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) /_ -.' +9a °' 9me\ _ - �� ° +e° / « �/ + + Z' °m° A 0 o y \ i - `,,s If I� 4y 500'42'40 "W 1344.51' Z _ O L7 D ' + rm �n m�D 0 Z >1 bh 1 20 c r 9 77 I \ \ \ / + / 1,77 c- Z D Z M Z i �'� " / r 1, \ /',' ,� 2 /'...%e',v a y .r 1 m C to ` e � --8- Z�v -�- + O L 133HS 33S — 3N1� HOldW - -- T) "I SL( TII'P: I?6L: (LENT PROJECT 11 zoo =sos z' sez INC. 111l1 F( ALE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC Planning ososo.0z0s rluttr s0a� �IAT A Visualiza Visualization nlacn r =soo v.9 n rrn,cp o n1 sG u +- D,R . VN IIILL CONS U LTIN G Civil Engineering 0s0IS00z0sP0s NS MPUfl /DR] CONCEPT UAL %6, T 11 JL Surveying �g & MP �g C11LC (P:U MPUDIJp I 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX (239) 597 -0 578 YA T GG R A A V 1G 6VG A T r LI� 1DH\. 542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278-5224 FAX (239) 278-5419 COLLIER B BOULEVARD (CR 951) + j J JN00-51'54-E 956.27 w 4� H HENDERSON CR EK CANAL I I z� I I I I I I I I I c m O 111 0 OD °10 I I I I OZ o � �Ilm� ° � ro o 7Z I I I I Zr0 � �, m mp � °(+ � I I I I I I 0T\ Z � _+ - - n \ r m I I I I r m I I I I I x - - - - r r � I I I EXISTING 170' F FPL EASEMENT F x8,31 + C ssLl'+ +, I I ----- - - - --' + .rs °2 1 ,,FPLASEMENT - s 4 m m mall ( ()� 1 ' _ _ _ Oc m m J 'I s 7 J R I I I � �OxZxxxcnx C O Z p { + +y° i a, - , Z I ( 70 S m'r a _�..., D D mmC NCm CDjm� -� A Apr Z - -- - Z>ZmnZ _1O�m(17 E +10- _ D Z so o - - Z W m C mZ r ' r( M-U I D NIm D Z O(A O K m ° c r A O Z p Z < A dam II m� °mvmi0 - - - - -- m M70 I Zm f V�m7 - I �z �WZ D x n 3 +� ` "'s + +s ' °�. 1 1 *J �Yr ' a� \ \\\., +',: \ P° r ,+ 9s II oz ° C y - °° m r r + )'31 �: Z O o9 (n a, - S tbNDEVEL PED +, "N00'48 -------- 00 "E 2683.�T2° v _ _____ _____ m / - l #,per +/ \ x 1� e \ \ m N V + N01'14'38 67575 ' so m `I --- , — — I Z r \ - `.°Ra';: / i A - -- '� 1 +x \ � --= -�.�r" - vu,§e,Tl I /— - - - -- -yc�� -_Z r ( pia -� `its � Y i .� �Iy� �n✓ S,X .� \��� T' __ oz � 1 -. 67s.6 z $ o , i -- f ... •• .rr.......r....i . r. .`l r - - - - - m ° v m � n 9 +' m c m A o - a ��! r x' 'e V, U) cn 1 mo m f_ m ° + + + �♦CV�r1�'' + ° m 9 � �,,' , ' i, w• / � C tr � � ` ti,� \ + I � . - - I * + ^' µ � aO f�'� CrJ 'TJ + URBAN RESIDENTIAL z �'i / i� +, + ++ ' +. r IT A p FRINGE (URF)_ ��.� _ I - -c.y i ° +_ J c°c ? RURAL FRINGE MIXED ti:�'S.���...��� +� USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) /_ -.' +9a °' 9me\ _ - �� ° +e° / « �/ + + Z' °m° A 0 o y \ i - `,,s If I� 4y 500'42'40 "W 1344.51' Z _ O L7 D ' + rm �n m�D 0 Z >1 bh 1 20 c r 9 77 I \ \ \ / + / 1,77 c- Z D Z M Z i �'� " / r 1, \ /',' ,� 2 /'...%e',v a y .r 1 m C to ` e � --8- Z�v -�- + O L 133HS 33S — 3N1� HOldW - -- T) "I SL( TII'P: I?6L: (LENT PROJECT 11 zoo =sos z' sez INC. 111l1 F( ALE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC Planning ososo.0z0s rluttr s0a� �IAT A Visualiza Visualization nlacn r =soo v.9 n rrn,cp o n1 sG u +- D,R . VN IIILL CONS U LTIN G Civil Engineering 0s0IS00z0sP0s NS MPUfl /DR] CONCEPT UAL %6, T 11 JL Surveying �g & MP �g C11LC (P:U MPUDIJp I 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX (239) 597 -0 578 YA T GG R A A V 1G 6VG A T r LI� 1DH\. 542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278-5224 FAX (239) 278-5419 6 133HS 33S - 3NIl HDiVh A, AGRICULTURE , �- - - - --� Al pili N01'04'1 I E + SINGLE — FAMILY HOMES Al a �• 2052.01' + PRIVATE NURSERY USES + rm 401'00'20 "E 683.43- .ps a Ion ° zm 'JO r �.�..� N00'S6'29'E 662 86' -Wv �_ o� ss •i`��."'d +•�+• � y 500'56 29 W 1368.25 MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 9 -MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 10 /X a NOT PART �OF' I 7 i o�ol i'N^czi i Pz 0 m z r C OEM III urn:. \"0,, SLC IR'P.- RGL SAL 1 i05 26E27E (CLIENT gm�l m of e z 000l m i D F1 F1 \ ( l S( ALE (FULL)l HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. I a�0 I I zD > I I T ��� Oi0150.0203 5,010.02 -COO nlaLn r =eoo I I °"° tJ "ILL MPUD/DRI CONCEPTUAL r l �^ N m r (i �D �DZ1 v C r > O A <A TaOm C m 050150O203PI1 jf" .�,.� �. MPUD /DRI o ID O 7. z m m .1 CO p m pOn�r (I1LC <LU TGD MANAGEMENT n 610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34 109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 64 O m O O M D z O � H < 7 152 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278-5224 FAX: (239) 278 -5419 Z A- m m T m p p ;0 Lo T m z n AZl Dm 'im0 O O z O zm �m� O m rzi -a z <zm W p c m Dix m m z ➢Nw D < O 5 Z z On N O m Z zz m C OEM III urn:. \"0,, SLC IR'P.- RGL SAL 1 i05 26E27E (CLIENT PROJFCT, ( l S( ALE (FULL)l HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. HACIENDA LAKES T ��� Oi0150.0203 5,010.02 -COO nlaLn r =eoo °"° tJ "ILL MPUD/DRI CONCEPTUAL 050150O203PI1 jf" .�,.� �. MPUD /DRI � 11L. IF VA. � r c w1 t Nu (I1LC <LU TGD MANAGEMENT n 610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34 109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 64 )) or 16 . . YA 152 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278-5224 FAX: (239) 278 -5419 F I o'' + '9 MATCH LINE — SEE SHEET 5 I I o a ++ I W>�p =z =i =ccil =�C cD zmmzr`IZ�omn�?� I °om OG 1n�O6p�rZ D W mZ +k mA mC D mf<T1C 1mj7cmoC)m� O W mD ommz �orr=Tl (n ASS Or Z �Z C7 m In - -I I 2 � ._ me ozr°zm m WD� fTl N ; p A m o C Z cn p _ � >D mxc > m� m � M mor= °z °�mzcc> ++ °m° p ozmm �m'�z Z PN - m O D C (n O < D D:LI°� Z o-�iO D' I - a zpo sF ,. cmzp 'mm mZ o om n- m v1 O I I 0 vmz m p c r O m + + +I z U) I i o c� N88'S6'10"W 2940.59' - - - -- --- - - - - -J 1° O +_� MX D on p tN0 C' Z n �0 °o i m C Oc me v 1 pm m I I -LIT 7T7 I D m m m m = n i m m r I I 1 D I,. cf) cf) O A m =<, m Onm b m m N m = CO I m O m i m -zi umi D -o m 0 D v1 r- FrI m I (n > Z o < cm3� V) � _ < —I 0 O o tn m rao bTo A m fTl Z Z F I m r z m A mm 0170 O o or � 0 f3l m m C D zz mm m m o X cf) (n m C7 C � m = D D n � N in X n D r = (n fTl m m n �z2 71 m m � o o z °c� m m m m O = m N I c?, n I A, AGRICULTURE i m UNDEVELOPED m N89'57'58 E 2200.53 N 0 0 J ' ° n m m i N89'57'58 "E 2497.82' 46'12 'E I I , 1 - S89'46'12 W _NU 356.23' N89' 4612"E 35623' - _ 356.23' C. zEr�o !'iI Sam v - $om b m C om D om n� .� II, -u q A b n O p z i o o� ° N89- 34.43 "E 365.01' p m � 1 . ;\ � � N m i y r"�".1 1% � ~ rm � G 'W m > Cl2 n C/3 m o s R goo V RC7 om _�f D D - N89'23'00 "F 364.14' N89'22'35 "E 710.09' N89'22'35'E_ ,35505' S89 22'35-W A s o ° 355,0 5' r `� z W N FE -a7 589'11'14'W 2906.24' o�K o -,Z S89'10'42"W 2835.68' ti D C- m ti i m O � - C) m r O � I me m m � ° z I - I m I I nln. yr utcn, 2010 SL( I P Ri xe,2ic C'LI[NP PRi INC. aLC - 3 (FULL) I' =300' HACIENDA LaxES of NAPLES, LLC. HACIENDA LAKES ��� A P'i'g Oo0Io0 -02 Od 50 "' Visualization ,III W (HALL 17 -F>00 °RA19"' , ILL ' MPUD /DRI CONCEPTUAL CONSULTING CivilFnginming 0101 n'00203P 12 M 5 J �� �D� j1� � � � T T j � S�l[y�,�711jg & Mapping It (IIL(1 �� ��% TER MANAGEMENT PLAN I I A l L 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 12 or 16 WIN. 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -5419 o o I\ \ I\ I� s' N -_ A I m I s sN - O sN I sN I I sN N sN I D _ I n i I s v i mm I _ 7 mo 0 sN I sN sN - I Z D I D Z D r r I � r N I N I� I a N I O Z D a r z IN s N ' N s m Im 00 _Z = 0z O5 o Z ��I .1 o - oN z n, x 0 o y o z D � � D 0o I2 m =N A O O 2 G7 G7 - C `a o I g o nmo= z I a I sN Ic s o s _ o ° 12 z G I A _ _ _ I sN o c o I � I I = sA 11 I I I o cl o o I_ sN IN m >A -•I I -I m I a - m - I PERI og I aI > I o cl I om I (A I ° mI 0 �I ; ov - I� 0 I oc=i � � I'll, I1ARC11. 2010 SLC 11Y5 RGL. !I -It': 2(;E.27E (LIE;NL PROJECT INC. "DIXTA t.HrItt1, 0,t S<AN HACIENDA LAKESofNapLES,LLC. HACIENDA LAKES 0a0 1s0.0203 n.rs. Virg Visualization rF •, DRAWN HILL RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK CO NSU LTIN G C ivil Engineering 0501.500203P13 . M SJ. Mp UDIDR I T T� JL Surveying & g tit Lt nt; ltii R (71L(KLU G T GAC l O T YPIC A L CROSS C G CT 1 V S 6610 Willow Par Drive, Suite 200. Naples, Florida 34109 (239)597 -0575 FAX: (239)597 -0 578 13 1 19 542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239( 278 -5224 FAX. (239) 278 -54 — \' — — \ A O V C \ � � O D N m < A yU m no v J U � U CDC \' t-� m Lo y0 O I C� rn an on m Dr O N A R IF m C7 N = D r o D � \ QI O mo D N 2 D NZ �i l a m m N Z p N no \o A m A -- N Z - D - - o cf) \ C D r— m K o m m S < Z 0 O m O D� N Z Z W O o �� V) m m m ZO �O N Z nZ N — C D C: � N O IrA \ m O / A 01 A m A m Df m \ f C O m \ > Z �Nl n F m D Z D U r N r y � N 0 O C� _ I _ A V \ m O Z m p / A m A m ? - A y -- o H \ Z -- o _ — — — — — — — r \ - z o D r z o v 0 0 N � < 0 �- O f � — — — — — — m N n N m m ?p Z� A� �O on cv D I x F: on Z N Z �n - 6" -7 _ o rCi > D xA D V C A m A m Df U Z O C r m D m N N N m mm O N T� ^V l / D r W m m _ o D - D N Z A m_ - m r m N D N r V) � m m -— r D o -0(/) c Dm N m A J In G� 1 D N -,. -_ m m O s A N r O Z f D Z N Z � rn c < CD m O U ti A � A m f>1 � V U � - p D W Z U O ZM C D N O \ f0 C m n 1n, UARCI1.2010 S ti C . 1 u P RGL !1'; ?+�: %:i0.5 26E.2TE ('LIE'vT PROJECT, INC. �r11 �rl S( ALE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LL C, �jA CIE'N�A L,AKE',S Planning D50I50. )2(13 TULU 1 = 950' Visualization DRAWN HILL TYPICAL INTERNAL CONSULTING Civil Engineering n5ol.loo2oavta vrs.�. MPUDIDj� j j t 11 1 Ping Mapping Serve & 1, " "C ROAD CROSS SECTIONS 11 LL 1 6610 Willow Park Drive. Suite 200, Naples. Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 16 14 r�i' 16 14 IL I J I I M1. 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239( 27 8-5224 FAX: (239) 27 8-5419 it I I I 0 2 I mA �2 N D DA Z � O y no i N OZ D Z ` � I m ➢ A j Z A D I -- x - mac, L ox °Ww 2 DC� m 0Dm� m= 0-I I m� Z L m, Z Mm mO I mmA Z �m X m N 0 Nm �z cD nr C m Z7 Z)1 mz n m m 0 m� �m Z Z N � D A Z � O S 1 O 10 � I O D N < _ A m� i ao r A � Z L7 M. r I O n c A m z � N m m z I m� m - O A ? N I m m mA ? I m< IZZ I A I 70 )o I l A x O N C _1 a IZZ F} X Ax O o m� m D 0 n m Z Oi Z11 m m Nm r0 0 C Z A D N C N S G D O Z m Z I Z D O O N � > m 00 o i < < y O A Z v Z N N � MD1, K,_0 OZ o� A p� o � m O m r m 0 m O 1 A m �A z su A I O >o I _ 0 om ' cm� INo > m� xl C O D c ;J 70 r m O f I 0 z Z O ZA N O " > ? < I Z D A D O A > I A� z mo `nom omA� 00 1 mzm' I �z � A mom` D % < D ° o D I x I mOm G m � m m z r m � m C ➢ \ m � � N Z m A I PRO.IECT \\ AmDZ I �'.i's SOS 2(iE27E I A - -- ALE D HACIENDA LAKES "DIX TA Planning \ O r _ C Visualization \ 2 D r O O X 0,,01500203P/5 A NN m N m MPUD�DRI D ZD i- ZA0 nm�:-a *Z DmDmx AAZAm� O-\ O D2 m C 0O~ 0 AAm cm ➢Rmm O Az f� m mZmm,o x N Z N m A 0 m C A O mDNmm A O Z om�m> C D mZODQ1 A jr > A N S N ti O Z n m D K m m � K H m uu A m K i D i ( ,m?'- c � C N m Z m A A N O O m I m O I ao r A � Z L7 M. r I O n c A m z � N m m z I m� m - O A ? N I m m mA ? I m< IZZ I A I 70 )o I l A x O N C _1 a IZZ F} X Ax O o m� m D 0 n m Z Oi Z11 m m Nm r0 0 C Z A D N C N S G D O Z m Z I Z D O O N � > m 00 o i < < y O A Z v Z N N � MD1, K,_0 OZ o� A p� o � m O m r m 0 m O 1 A m �A z su x x : AX] i mz- mz' O iN m 7 (7 O Z 7 I o 0 FF I I I I N I CJ� I I m D 00 I c- m I o�� U O r*m Z Z °c° C-) I ox .1 �� ZZ � (/) m µ A I O m o I _ 0 om ' o� <H > m� xl Z O f I 0 z Z O U > ? < I Z D A D O A > I m I 1 � I < � A % < D ° o D I x I mOm G m � m m z r m ,N F1 m � � SEC IItP RGE: I PRO.IECT WAR01, 2010 I �'.i's SOS 2(iE27E I A - -- ALE — HACIENDA LAKES "DIX TA Planning O A X o f J_ Visualization m HILL TYPICAL I X 0,,01500203P/5 <D MPUD�DRI D Z Z on i- CROSS SECTIONS A Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 36109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: m > 7 D 1+ I 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -Sa19 1542 239) FAX (59) 278- r m > m m ri - < m i ( m � z <� A X D O x x : AX] i mz- mz' O iN m 7 (7 O Z 7 I o 0 FF I I I I N I CJ� I I m D 00 I c- m I o�� U O r*m Z Z °c° C-) I ox .1 �� ZZ � (/) m µ X A m z (n A D 0 m Z O D X I o - < % < D ° o D I x I mOm G m � m m z r m P F1 m � � SEC IItP RGE: CLIENT PRO.IECT WAR01, 2010 I �'.i's SOS 2(iE27E INC. „r, ALE HACIENDA LAKES of NapLES, LL C. HACIENDA LAKES "DIX TA Planning 2 O 01 �0 -0203 (FULL 1` 950' Visualization DRAWN HILL TYPICAL CONSULTING Civil Engineering 0,,01500203P/5 ATS.)f MPUD�DRI j t T Tl 1 Surveying & Mapping 1 G "IL0,L`T U.f LN, CROSS SECTIONS Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 36109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: I rn 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -Sa19 1542 239) FAX (59) 278- COLLEGE PARK L __ I I III I I II LII I "I: COLLEGEWOOD a 1 I I I I I kll; I I ;III I I I CI E s pt ?� 3p 3= N illy r I I ill II - II _ jx jm N fm �pp II p z _ im z my C9 m z z z N - z a 0 0, _________ COWER 80ULEY,Y2D (CR 951) co BOU �� ARD (CR 951 t____ ___ ____ ___ ___ ____ ____ __ _- . _ ___ L ER LLY mm� I I I I III � II n -- o�C �\ - . v II i C; L__ Z. CA II II III A I II I II - I n I II 1"o� F. i V I i I h 1 I W I I N � I I I CA N 1 \ i J I I I I �I. + I I 1 \ 1 \I\ I I 1 1 I I I Iv I w0 I I I V (0 6 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I yI1 I I I I I I ____________________ __ I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I v .mu .mu N N I 0 0 0 (o O V OD 7 7z I I I I I I n n I I I i i i I I I SEC? 11AP RGL (LIEwr PROJECT VIARC11.2010 I ;r)i� � IOS 26E.27E INC. N0 „r l „ <r. « ALE (FULL) I'= 1000 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. 1 HACIENDA LAKES �� �� P'a"t'ir'g (1 01 iOOLO'3 OJALP 1-2000 Visualization ”` °R ` UTILITY FACILITIES & CONSULTING Civil Engineering 01 n,m �oo2osPls Ms. W.S.I. MpUDIDl I 1 < T 11 1 Surveying & Mapping IG or 16 CIE RL D.11A. OFFSITE INTERFACE EXHIBIT L 8810 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Floiida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5226 FA %: (239) 278 -5419 239) 8 Ak (2 9) 278- HACIENDA LAKES NARRATIVE AND BASIS FOR APPROVAL The Hacienda Lakes MPUD is located east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) near the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, within Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The Project contains property located in two Future Land Use Designations, and now includes 625 acres (27% of the total Project area) in the Urban Residential Fringe Sub - district, and 1,637.07 acres (73% of the total Project area) in the Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District Sending Lands as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from the Future Land Use Element as contained in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The total acreage of the DRI is approximately 2,262.14 acres. The Project provides for the following: • 1,760 residential dwelling units (See Statement of Compliance); • a maximum of 327,500 +/- square feet of retail (convenience, general and specialty retail), 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office space, a 135 room hotel, 140,000 square feet of business park or school, and a public elementary school to serve up to 919 students; • maintain the existing Swamp Buggy attraction land use on a parcel consisting of 47.27 +/- acres; and maintain the existing Junior Deputies passive recreation facilities on a 21.62 +/- acre site. It is anticipated that the MPUD will be developed commencing in 2012, as follows: Year Residential Single - Family Multi - Family Retail Office Business Park School 2012 50 Units 20 Units 30 Units 27,500 SF 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 2013 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF 20,000 SF 0.0 SF 2014 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF* 25,000 SF 40,000 SF 2015 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 25,000 SF 20,000 SF 919 Students 2016 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 2017 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 2018 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 2019 210 Units 84 Units 126 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF Totals: 1760 Units 704 Units 1056 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 140,000 SF 919 Students * The 135 room hotel is proposed to be developed in 2014. The MPUD includes approximately 1,544.14 acres of preserve, which includes both uplands and wetlands. A permanent conservation easement will be created after the Developer has completed the required restoration and maintenance program required by the County's Land Development Code provisions related to Transfer of Development Rights program. The ultimate preserve conservation easements will be conveyed to a Federal, State, or local government agency by gift as required by the County's Land Development Code provisions related to Transfer of Development Rights program. The development area is limited to approximately 718 acres. The site includes a number of identified archeological sites, all of which fall within preserve areas. The project furthers the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District objectives by severing Transfer of Q Development Rights ( "TDRs ") from approximately 1,517.74 acres of lands designated Sending Lands on the FLUM (See the TDR Sending Exhibit in the Statement of Compliance). Those Sending 6/28/2011 Pagel of 4 Q;\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development \Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Support\liearingsQ011 -6 -28 Narrative S Basis For Approvallclean).docx Lands which generate the TDRs will be placed under a permanent conservation easement and ultimately deeded to a public entity (such as the SFWMD or Division of Forestry). The proposed Hacienda Lakes MPUD has a diversity of residential development opportunities in both single - family and multi - family designs. The MPUD Ordinance Exhibits define and articulate the permitted land uses, plan of development, and development standards in writing and through graphic depictions to ensure an accurate reading of their content. Exhibit B of the MPUD Ordinance Exhibits also includes land use conversions to allow for a diversity of residential and non - residential land development opportunities while maintaining a consistent level of impact on public facilities. Several of the multi - family development scenarios will provide for the opportunity to construct attached single - family land uses with each residential unit being marketed and sold with a platted lot. Those residential units will be attached side by side, or in some instances back to back in groups. The project design is intended to minimize vehicular movement near the primary accesses to the residential units by using motor courts to access two -car garages that would be in the rear of the units. The motor court, in many instances, will define front yards for establishing setbacks, with the primary accesses to the residential units being from a "paseo ", or pedestrian only access way that is intended to be shaded with canopy landscaping materials. The decision to retain the existing Swamp Buggy attraction land uses and the Junior Deputy League's passive recreation land uses in their current location required rethinking of the proposed land uses that would surround those existing facilities and land uses. While the Junior Deputy passive recreation land use may be compatible with residential land uses, the attraction land use can be more problematic, related to land use compatibility, due to loud engines used to power the swamp buggies during limited, special race events up to six times a year. A business park or school tract is now proposed north of the Swamp Buggy facilities, with direct access to Collier Boulevard via the extension of The Lord's Way. The location of these potential land uses adjacent to the Swamp Buggy facilities will provide a transition of land uses from which, over distance, will have minimizing affect on sound levels generated by the infrequent race events. Likewise, the retention of the Junior Deputy League's passive recreation land uses south of the Swamp Buggy lands will also provide for sound attenuation over distance to provide for compatibility between land uses. East of the Swamp Buggy facilities are preserves and a School land use tract, that while providing the spatial separations from proposed residential land use areas to the south, also will mitigate the Project's recently determined demand for additional education public facilities. Requested Deviations Contained in Exhibit E of the MPUD Ordinance Exhibits: Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 5.03.02.F.1., related to alteration of ground where a fence or wall is to be installed, which prohibits alteration of existing ground levels for the purpose of increasing the height of a proposed fence or wall, to allow fences or walls to be installed on top of berms. Fence or wall heights shall comply with Deviation #5. This deviation is contemplated for the subject property for compatibility with the surrounding land uses and to provide for a taller road noise attenuation barrier to separate vehicular movement on future private and public roadways, as well as to provide for compatibility between the various 10 permitted land uses. This ground alteration in the location of proposed fences and walls provides for 6/28/2011 Page 2 of 4 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development \Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Support\Hearings \2011 -6 -28 Narrative & Basis For Approval (clea n).docx an efficient use of the development land area and provides an effective means of minimizing roadway related impacts on land uses adjacent to roadways, whether public or private. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 6.06.01.B. related to streets in subdivisions, that requires subdivisions to have rights -of -way for streets, to allow private streets to be provided in access easements rather than rights -of way. Some of the multi- family residential development scenarios provided for in this MPUD are compact in design, and the desire to plat the individual lots necessitates the use of access easements rather than right -of -way tracts as is required by LDC. This deviation from LDC requirements is innocuous given that the internal streets will function more as driveways, similar to condominium projects, and will be privately maintained by the future home owners association. The platting of the lots intended to be sold in a fee simple manner will provide a greater sense of pride in ownership and will be consistent, and compatible with the future, neighboring subdivisions within, and beyond the boundaries of the MPUD. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.5.c. that functionally limits the number of model homes allowed to a maximum of five models, to allow one model home for each variant of the residential product proposed in the project. A project of this size may be broken into several communities, with each community potentially providing a variety of residence types, styles and floor plans, it is essential not to arbitrarily limit the opportunity of a home buyer to see the creativity of the architecture proposed in a development. This deviation is appropriate, and does not negatively affect the health and safety, nor welfare of the future residents of the development. A reasonable limitation on the number of models (e.g.: not to exceed 60 models for the entire MPUD) has been provided for in the MPUD Document. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02 to allow "boundary marker" signage on property corners fronting on existing, proposed, or future public roadways that provide access to the MPUD. This deviation is requested primarily for safety and welfare reasons. Given existing traffic conditions on Collier Boulevard, and in anticipation of travel conditions on future public roadways, the requested signage will help motorists identify the entrance location from a distance that is sufficient to allow them to safely gain access to the property. The sign content area for boundary markers to be located in the Residential Tract R may be 15 feet in height rather than 8 feet as limited in LDC Subsection 5.06.02B.6.b. This additional sign height is deemed necessary due to the elevations of the existing and future public roadways. Deviation #5seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C.2. that limits fence or wall heights to six (6') feet, to allow fences or walls to be no greater than eight (8') feet. This deviation is requested to provide for separation screening between the various residential communities that may be created throughout the MPUD, as well as between units as privacy walls. Where associated with existing or future public roadways, or the swamp buggy track within the Attraction Tract, a 20 foot tall visual and sound attenuating screen may be installed as a wall, berm, or wall/berm combination. The LDC limitation of six foot fences and walls do not provide for the necessary screening and sound attenuation desired for the development. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Sections 4.02.12 G., and 4.06.02 C. 5., that requires a six ® foot tall opaque architecturally finished masonry wall, or berm, or combination thereof be provided around the boundaries of a business park. Buffering around the proposed Business 6/28/2011 Page 3 of 4 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development\Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Support\Hearings\2011 -6 -28 Narrative & Basis For Approvallclean).docx Park Tract would be as required b the entirety of the referenced sections of the LDC but the six Y Y foot wall, or berm, or combination thereof would only be required where the Business Park Tract abuts the Residential Tract. This deviation is appropriate given the specific characteristics of the existing and proposed land uses that would be proximate to the future business park land uses. The required buffer is most appropriate between the Business Park Tract and the Residential Tract, and furthers the intended compatibility assurance that would be achieved through such separation and buffering. The Applicant finds that the land uses permitted in the Attraction Tract would not be susceptible to significant impacts from noise, odor, or glare impacts that may emanate from future business park land uses given that the character of the land uses permitted in the Attraction Tract may be complementary to those land uses that may be developed in the Business Park Tract. The primary land use of the Attraction Tract being periodic swamp buggy and other motorized vehicle competitions may garner fabrication or other mechanical support services from future business park land uses. While the spatial and landscape buffer requirements of the LDC would be upheld, the requirement to construct wall or berm to a height of six feet would not apply to the boundaries of the Business Park Tract abutting the Attraction Tract and Preserve Tract. No land alterations or structures are permitted in the Preserve Tract that would require compatibility buffering from future land uses that may be developed in the Business Park Tract, therefore, no wall or berm is required along this common boundary. Deviation #7 seeks to allow one real estate sign in addition to the real estate signage permitted in LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2., that would be erected off -site from the Residential Tract, in the Commercial Tract. This deviation is intended to provide exposure of the residential marketing efforts for communities in the MPUD that lie east of the commercial portion of the Project through off -site real estate signage to be located in the Commercial Tract. This one additional real estate sign, of the height and dimensions of LDC Section 5.06.02 B.2.c., would be more evident to the motoring public either on Collier Boulevard, or on the future extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. This deviation is appropriate given the distance that the residential development areas are from the major public roadway accesses to the MPUD. Deviation #8 The existing Swamp Buggy sign located in the southeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock road and Collier Boulevard shall be allowed to remain until a new sign can be permitted in Tract C. This deviation is consistent with Resolution Number 2011 -57, that approved an after the fact sign variance for the existing Florida Sports Park/Swamp Buggy Races sign, Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1. that limits care unit Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to 0.45, to allow a care unit FAR of 0.60. This deviation is consistent with past approvals for floor area ratios associated with "care units" that provide housing for senior citizens. This deviation will allow for efficiency in design of care 10 unit land uses while providing for the supporting infrastructure and open space within a development parcel. 6/28/2011 Page 4 of 4 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development \Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application SupportHearings';2011 -6 -28 Narrative & Basis For Approval (ciean).docx Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal BCC Review Materials STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of Hacienda Lakes will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The development will be consistent with the GMP goals, objectives and policies, and with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), and other applicable regulations for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within Activity Center # 7, the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (URF), and Sending Lands of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the Agricultural/ Rural Mixed Use District as identified on the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The purpose of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict is to provide for a variety of residential and mixed -use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. 2. The residential density of the proposed PUD will be in compliance with the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element. The MPUD will implement the Density Blending provisions of the FLUE. The URF is limited to 1.5 dwelling units per acre. The Project has approximately 589.69 acres within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, including lands within Mixed Use Activity Center #7, but exclusive of the lands proposed as business park. Therefore, 884.53 dwelling units are provided for. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides for 0.20 dwelling units per acre as a "base" Transfer of Development Right (TDR) credit for Sending lands. The Project has approximately 1637 acres of Sending Lands adjacent to the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, of which approximately 121.79 acres are proposed for development, or are within the proposed Benfield Road corridor. Those 121.79 acres proposed for development, or a part of the Benfield road corridor are not permitted to generate TDR's, but are permitted to have a density of one dwelling unit per forty acres, therefore, 3.04 units are provided for. A density bonus is also being utilized by providing excess mitigation activities as provided for in the FLUE and implemented in Section 3.05.07 of the LDC, where 10% of the eligible density may be granted for the creation, enhancement or restoration of habitat for listed species. The sum total of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict base density, including those lands in Activity Center #7, and those lands intended for development in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is 888 dwelling units (884.53 + 3.04 = 887.57, or 888 units). In order to determine the overall potential density of the MPUD, the base density derived herein would need to be added to the potential units that may be generated from the density bonus, TDR credits and TDR bonus credits severed from onsite, and potentially off -site Sending lands subject to the locational criteria of the FLUE. 3. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides for 0.20 dwelling units per acre as a "base" Transfer of Development Right (TDR) credit for Sending lands. The Project has approximately 1637.07 acres of Sending lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District, of which approximately 121.79 acres are proposed for development. Those 121.79 acres proposed for development, or within the proposed Benfield Road corridor, are not permitted to generate TDR's. Therefore, the remaining 1515.28 acres generates 303.05 "base" TDR credits. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) provides for 0.20 dwelling units per acre as a "bonus" TDR credit for "early entry ", a 0.20 dwelling units per gross acre "bonus" TDR credit for "restoration and maintenance" of preserves, and a 0.20 dwelling units per gross acre "bonus" TDR credit for "conveyance" of preserves within Sending lands. A Growth Management Page 1 of 6 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development \Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Support\Hearings\EAC\2011 -5 -4 Statement of Compliance (clean).docx Plan (GMP) amendment is being pursued that would provide for an increase in density by utilizing all of the TDRs that qualify for transfer into the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. The sum total of base TDR credits and TDR bonus credits that may be generated from on -site Sending lands, including all qualified TDR credits is 1212.22 units. Those RFMUD Sending Lands within 1 mile of the URF boundary that are not proposed for development equal 1022.04 acres, which generate 817.63 TDRs. Those RFMUD Sending Lands that do not qualify to be used in the URF equal approximately 493 acres. 4. The Dwelling Unit Entitlement Summary, below provides for the a residential yield of up to 1851.44 units, which is the sum of the total base density of Project lands within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, the base density of lands intended to be developed in the Sending lands of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, the ten percent density bonus for excess mitigation, and all the TDR credits that could be generated from qualified, on -site Sending lands. Despite this 1,851.44 unit total, the requested Project density is limited to 1,760 units. Therefore the overall Project gross density would not exceed 0.78 dwelling units per acre. 5. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD will implement Policy 3.1 of the FLUE through on -site well field protection measures, preservation of NRPA lands within the Project, preservation of archaeological sites within the Project, and the safe and convenient vehicular and pedestrian movement within the Project. 6. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. 7. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD will implement Policy 5.6 of the FLUE through the use of clustered development and utilization of the TDR program within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. 8. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with the LDC as set forth in Objective 3 of the FLUE. Page 2 of 6 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development \Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Suppott\Hearings\EAC \2011 -5 -4 Statement of Compliance (clean).docx Hacienda Lakes DRI /MPUD Dwelling Unit Entitlement Summary Acres Calculation Ratio Total Units Density Calculation with no GMP Amendments Base Density Calculation (FLUE) Urban Residential Fringe (URF) Density excluding business park acreage 553.02 1.5 per acre 829.53 Urban Residential Fringe TDR lift (receiving capacity) 553.02 1 per acre 553.02 Mixed Use Activity Center (MUAC) Density 36.67 1.5 per acre 55.01 Activity Center TDR lift (receiving capacity) 36.67 1 per acre 36.67 Business Park 35.38 0 per acre 0.00 Business Park TDR lift (receiving capacity) 35.38 1 per acre 35.38 Total Density in Urban Residential Fringe (Base Density only computed on lands other than business park) 589.69 1509.61 Sending Lands (FLUE) Total Sending Area 1637.07 Sending Area to be Developed or within Benfield ROW 121.79 1 per 40 acres 3.04 Total Density created by Sending Lands 0` Density Bonus via Mitigation Actin-itic s (LDC 3.05.07. F. 4. b. iii) Density Bonus via excess Mitigation Activities 10% bonus to residential density Total Units Without GMP Amendment 1663.91 Page 3 of 6 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP,0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit De\ clopmenCSubtask 5.2 MPUD Application SupponUiearingsTAC\2011 -5 -4 Statement of Compliance (clean).docx , ,/,-- LEGEND: III QUALIFIED SENDING AREA = 1022.04 ACRES AREA NOT QUALIFIED FOR SENDING = 493.23 ACRES DEVELOPMENT IN RFMUD 121.79 ACRES CoIII URF PRESERVE _ 53.06 ACRES ' 1 a RFMUD PRESERVE 5280 ' _ _ I F J ! 1491.08 ACRES 0 r , r 1 � I: III ' i r 1 I , 111 l SABAL PALM ROAD - III III ' 111 !1 III , , wy 10, 2071 17:50 P 0:\2005 \030150.02.0.1 Rxi-do Lwv, NP00 -Vm -CRP \0001 C. 01 C?' Il \OOM t'I rrnt- DIVA INC. MAY, 201 " P, HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC. Visualization .A tsi TL S L Sig " ;ng HACIENDA LAKES 5510 willow Park Drive, Suits 2DO T D R SENDING EXHIBIT Naples, Florida 34109 FAX i )' 97'� 050150.02.03 1 1 0501500203PX35 FAX (239)) 597-0 8 Page 4 of 6 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda takes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development\Subtask 52 MPUD Application Support\Hearings\EAC \2011 -5 -4 Statement of Compliance (clean).docx Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD Dwelling Unit Entitlement Summary Continued Density Additions with GMP Amendments Use of Eligible TDRs within Project boundary up to a max density of 3 units per acre in URF Inventory of RFMU lands Developed Sending Areas within 1 mile 121.79 Developed Sending Areas past 1 mile 0 Undeveloped Sending Areas within 1 mile 1022.04 Undeveloped Sending Areas past 1 mile 493.23 Total RFMU Sending Lands 1637.07 Calculation of Eligible TDR Sending Area Generation (within 1 mile) Base TDR (undeveloped lands within one 1022.04 1 per 5 acres 204.41 mile only) 1st TDR Bonus (undeveloped lands within 1022.04 1 per 5 acres 204.41 one mile only) 2nd TDR Bonus (Restoration and Maintenance for undeveloped lands within one 1022.04 1 per 5 acres 204.41 mile only) 3rd TDR Bonus (Conveyance for 1022.04 1 per 5 acres 204.41 undeveloped lands within one mile only) Total 817.63 TDRs used under current GMP rules (see 1 per acre of URF above) 625.07 625.07 Remaining= Qualifled TDRs to be used 192.56 1,663.91 units without GMP plus 192.56 eligible TDRs Total Units Allowed Using All Eligible TDRs unused 1856.48 589.69 ac x 1.5 base density (base density for Project Maximum Amount of Units at 2.8 URF minus business park) units per URF acre as requested by GMP + 625.07 ac x 1.3 tdr amendment and including URF land density receiving capacity (entire and bonuses allowed URF acreage) + rural lands density (3.04 units) + bonus units (151.26) 1851.44 Applicant Requested Density 1760 Overall Gross Project Density (du pe r acre) 2,262.14 0.78 Page 5 of 6 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development\Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application SupportWearingsTAC\2011 -5 -4 Statement of Compliance (clean).doox 9. The development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policy 3.1 of the FLUE. 10. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD Master Plan implements Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 of the FLUE by providing for vehicular and pedestrian interconnections with off -site public roadways and adjacent greenway. Additionally, public access and roadway easements will not be vacated to preclude access to off -site private and public lands. 11. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD will implement Policy 2.2.2. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element through the utilization of the Best Management Practices Matrix currently being promulgated by the SFWMD. 12. The native vegetation provisions of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD implement Policy 6.1.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element in that native preserves will be incorporated into the project design. 13. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD will implement Policy 6.2.3. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, wherein the majority of the on -site lands within the NRPA will be protected through conservation easement, and will have the opportunity to utilize the TDR program set forth in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE. 14. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as may be required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. 15. By virtue of compliance with the provisions of Chapter 6, of the LDC, the project will also implement, and further Objective 2.0 of the FLUE, Objective 1.2 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element, and Objective 1.5 of the Recreation and Open Space Element. 15. Should a business park be developed in the MPUD, it shall be located within the development consistent with the Business Park provisions of the FLUE. Specifically related to access to the business park, where The Lord's Way shall provide principal access as a direct connection to Collier Boulevard (CR- 951), which designated a minor arterial in the Transportation Element. Page 6 of 6 Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development\Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Support\Iiearings\EAC \201 I -5 -4 Statement of Compliance (clean).docx Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal BCC Review Materials ADDRESSING CHECKLIST ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following AND FAX (239 - 659 -57 ,24) OR SUBMIT IN PERSON TO TILE ADDRESSING SECTION. ,FORM MUST EE SIGNED B Ti'ADDRESSI.1YG PERSONNEL PRIOR TO PRE APP CATIONMLEEMG. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. 1. Legal dewriptison of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) �F -(i arS e see attar e i[sx n rt 5 c 4 � oP� S i Z 1% 1 Z •t Z 5 S c- -7- 4 c• r �' 2. Folio (Property ID) number(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more tha one) ti S-o - Z7 Please see attached ist. 3. Street address or addresses (as applicable, if already assigned) 4. Locations map, showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right -of -way (attach) 5. Copy of survey (NEEDED ONLY FOR UNPLATTED PROPERTIES) 6. Hacienda Lakes of Naples 7. Proposed Street names (ifupplicable) 8. Site Development Plan Number (FOR EXISTING PROJECTS /SITES ONLY) SDP 9. Petition Type - (Complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition Type) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ SDPI (SDP Insubstantial Change) ❑ ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision flat) FP (Final Plat) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ SIM (SIPI Insubstantial Change) ❑ ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) 13L (Blasting Permit) ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ Vegetation/Exotic (Veg. Rentoval Permits) ❑ ❑ ROW (,Riglxt -of -Way Permit) EXP (Excavation, Permit) ® Land Use Petition (Variance, Conditional Use, ❑ VRSFP (Veg. Removal & Site Fill Permit) Boat Dock Ext., Rezone, PUD rezorxe, etc.) ❑ Other - Describe: ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominitun documents (if applicable; indicate whether proposed or existing) 10. Please Check One: Z Checklist is to be Faxed Back ❑ Personally Picked Up 11. Applicant Name Anna Rosa Phone 5-9-7-0575 e 236 Fax 547 -0578 12. Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Addressing Section. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Primary Number a-q-.Q- A A o-C. A Address Number Address Ni-imber Li Address dumber _ Approved by t Ma "1 Date f - t 9-" PROPERTY LOCATION Sedion/Township /Range 12J-3,14,23-2_4 & 5/� 6E Section/Township/Range 30/5 QSJ� Lot: Block: _ Subdivision: Plat Bonk Page #: — Property I.D. #: bD41$ 44409 d0 1 4QOQ +i1L�[r:11 /r1 1I. _ .!//_ 11• - !11 •1• .r1/ i1. x111 QOL41 4 :1lI of ..111• !!• •.•/11 ar •.111: r1 .11a is / +/. I *• •111• I1• ;111 11. .:.//1 11. .* 111. •!. I:If1: 1f. •111• af. 1111: r!• :IIf /!• ■11 114 .lf1 0041 Z4AQ-QDA. 0041M0005, 114 • /!1 11• .111l. 114 ..l1l; 11y j •f /• 11. :/11/1 1a• :.11 1: f!R :.11 ! 114 :.11 !. i1, .11/ IL. •1111 ■1. :•!If MI• •I:ar1 Q043412006,0043-416-0-0013, 00A3_4200007, QOA34560006, 11. ..11.1 11. • 1ri: 1 +• .r1a1 00-43USQUO-02, 014 64SOQ03, /14 .:•11 /• I1• . ;;111 !f. •• 11ff +/. .•.!/1 1f. i11i11 Ir• .1li 01.9 11 ! 11. •1.1. 11 .a•1 1 +. • // /!• •1 11• M'16 • 1+.. 1.111 Ir• �Ia /. I b frfvQ w-- i - - ICI-I() Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal BCC Review Materials BOUNDARY �o /(A • ~�-dr �'z> 00 2 y y C I °� PP S F a z4 W. .i f v 9�o H; � Vii$; 9 I. I - > \ f- fTl D D F- 7-) D fTl\ (n D O O Zo Cn �bK I O Z Z 0 Z O---1 FTl r , O Cn F9 C �u �u A < T O D m oA u0, o m U z O O Lai W 2 S D O m Z 0 D F- > m (n O 9 Z D u F F7-1 N I r O D O F11 Z 0 D D fTl (/� O 7 Z D 0 F7 - $9 I 11 o- $ --_ yip z - a - oA w 8 3" A� a - - -- - m�m - �� -pf p ° 'lm - - ef= - - Q - _ - - - g - 7^ m - - - - - - _ - - - - p oho - - - - - o�,o _ - - - - - - -s mm - Bp a 3A - - 2,�° - - if _ " _ - - _ - - _ _ - - _ °f� _ _ _ _ - - - f� _ - - f - - ..p' �r oy °mom ° F m °� s Af� _z—,-- - - - - _ - - i {o_ - o u� - - 2z -_- - _ - D�➢o ^ m £ ° mmo° nmz 9 0 o A SfN V=s p 00 !,,I v 0 z 8 L b A I 11 a m u i �`U o w^ N - - A "411 Z; r- in A _° ; a° o o s o o v r .f o - .yon -2 y- . Zn ^ c2j ^, ^ N O Z SoF i a nnyn Lr° .101 m r " ',: nnz r' to Fo Z F m T O _ m a a ,z -' T ° -_ in 2;: i ,,n zi q �N I o -' " - oy � o Z ," -s O - os� - n �n N- xm �nr_ - a - c IIm F"J C ^ - O ,-�_ �_= �vm° �m _ p o I Im ° - =x �oo -�o0 0 0 6 D ," _ A �° Iao 11 m � �< m � x - - "u m mm °nom �" i m -. - 'z °o" i �; ^ $, a, m. °° o a a IA � o 0 0 0 0 11 �m 7 n m ° m ° ; � amp D v- m o T m x m xo� x ;= tip i J m o ° o x Aoa on ,xxsnxxxx,,x.. x x x � D n r A ? c o i m To a o n y s o� O T� T v m °z -, ,� �, r m m m �, �, m m m m m m mm m m N n Fn cn s n I F _ _- .- tton z w u A_ z Z °� o s Aa m s N T m s F s m " i \ i fo m oo - T �- T T T T s D m oo m m m m Ak m o0 0� i> "c n _ r - .11 m D m s °8 T ^, T t v "o� cP� r A 'A n n es m a r p Z v'^' m a> m z P > ck- izrn we ];, n n n n a i eT >, n x i ��; (a�, a a A a a °e ti a o a A o -, z z -, A -� s LA z i^,-,2 n a 'e m '" 11 i a w w v ti ti-, a o D -u —i s a� o o °,, n a a a � z n m . >° - x s �° � mx m —i 1. Im X11- , gy m �, 1 = m m � - 11 I nA o `� r i a T r 11 1,° i� z° T' m o s r m ,'- 1 ,°rz - u o� o p'm� m� -_ �� ° �� �� o - 11 ^ T cn ny�o" .m - rs� T ,-, T q' 11 �m - i� z a orp a oo e nom ,4 n z c ms ° T = m on A a aU._ � n "- - i _ m m mm r ei o f m> m n i I m °p a n - ° ° s 2 `j p S 11 np n o. o° °.° ,^ T '1 i Ain a o- Sr ... c i �`U g , 1, °61 - I 2J a ° -1 � �� N zn - m Z; 2A 22� ; a° ZZm Yams - n a mT o f -, n o m -- o— M 11 - T a m Fn� o , m > ° - .yon -2 y- . Zn ^ c2j ^, ^ N O Z SoF i a nnyn Lr° .101 m r " ',: nnz r' to Fo Z F m T O _ m no T ° -_ in 2;: i ,,n zi q �N I o -' " - oy � o Z O - os� - - - - �n - - �nr_ - ~� _ _ - U� AU "'" Au -, - � �i °v_ - F"J C ^ - O _ ✓, - �m _ p p� mm 6 mN S~ n��, A n , -1 m mm °nom �" i m -. - 'z °o" i �; ^ ° a, m. °° o z, 11 �m a m ° m ° ; � amp L� z v- V i J 2 p ; ZI m r i zm�° To w � - , �� �a °� o Aa a° ° y o ma ° _ m- m y n? z = �o p r - z Az os �_ nm T �c U s LA - i^,-,2 n a m 11 so T a o m - a mx ; z zz� �I- o s r m ,'- 1 ,°rz " � s ° s T n ny�o" �A - mo - rs� T ,-, T 11 �m o i� z a orp t- do m op �Un m ms ° T m on A 2�> ° � �° ° or ^T= m m mm o ei o f m> m n i I FT - n n� ° ° s 2 `j p S I - i Ain a o- Sr r oov i y ; n° m mz ��J f o ; A° T L > O 0 El Fn Oz t4A io. � �— Z>� OQ siz:l ; _� F- I C) > m > C) > > X F- ;�' x > M -Z (f) C,() C3 0 1:: --A -11 m --- I M F- U) F- (::: M (f) M F- C) O 71 oa > r- > O O F9 0 N) m Z FT1 in o U) C) m fn ON I • • m fn ON I LJ COUNTY ROAD 951 (100' WIDE) �� " z Ro . •xv a.: o vn O "s � I I ' o LJ COUNTY ROAD 951 (100' WIDE) �� " z Ro . •xv a.: o vn O "s ' o nv wt I w•,�w ' _ SOD•Y "JOY fl2N' O E_ N,�S N w urvNOPbi�Sz r;: m a a _ o , �o I o - A - -�A --- O O -- ` -- NO o J- - -- - -- - -� ----- r--------- ----- - --- .� —_ -- �— — — \— --� - -- — - -- — - - - -- - -- --------- - - - - -- l G m�$� 1 swu•wv �° � O _ w > m i _ a M vn fn II _�,n ��� ��•. :gym , o V t � ill M A O k^ D n m Z op �D �= D F-9 N c/) O O W ti D F- �A m m° 0 oo► O O e� D C) M, ml N N o Z D r N D F- D D C� r- D Z F- m C m ' o ' _ SOD•Y "JOY fl2N' O E_ N,�S N w urvNOPbi�Sz m „ . C) z cn 0 i rn � C N I -< n A O k^ D n m Z op �D �= D F-9 N c/) O O W ti D F- �A m m° 0 oo► O O e� D C) M, ml N N o Z D r N D F- D D C� r- D Z F- m C m - --------------------- ,Uo I w, _- ooz z 00 SEW iF 25 tag I II II .7� F- > > DI Cf) > Ip CD 0 -TI m (f) C: F7 � Y, < m F- 0 FTI C/) 0 CAI Ti 41 CFI Cf) V) 0 III J� C) Fj g- > m > M F FT1 .^ U) rTl II II II II II II Ill II II I ht �51 Zft� Z> II I ---------- ---------- �X 2M.V'(0) Oil �T - - - - - - !UI)MI �17 11 ----------- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------ II II II > m II > C-) > U� II II II II II II Ill II II I ht �51 Zft� Z> II I ---------- ---------- �X 2M.V'(0) Oil �T FTI fTl Cf) cc).. GO II II II lil II II II II II V/ 11 II _� liv O� I II -------- --- --- ---------------------- C�o a III 1 RS 'Y Ll %K�� 0 ------------ F- > m II > C-) > U� > > m Cf) J, m U) F u (-- F9 Z - < r7 F- -< FTI fTl Cf) cc).. GO II II II lil II II II II II V/ 11 II _� liv O� I II -------- --- --- ---------------------- C�o a III 1 RS 'Y Ll %K�� 0 --------- --- L�- q % -- -------------- II pI 0o I ------------ -------- --- J, cr) I I > r— A --------- --- L�- q % -- -------------- II pI 0o I 00. (D - n-1 A > Ie I LEI ---------------- ------------ F, z m V) Z m (A FT1 fTl Cf') ------------ -------- --- 00. (D - n-1 A > Ie I LEI ---------------- ------------ F, z m V) Z m (A FT1 fTl Cf') Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal BCC Review Materials AERIAL s W 175— _ � � + ����� -f � i t ^. � �°`r,,� �� m... w s' ? �. ,�, , _ 4 c.. �^t� : '.:' �'y � �w-r, +�r•^ A yyi qn � Q RADIO RD' BECK BLVD LL ,1 t 1 � � � �< r, `'�..- ..,,��� gip, f 'ti ai-�.�''•��� lr Fill : '_ n W, t "FJ,*� : d ` ^µ s n s i RATTLESNAKE3HAMMOCK RD� s SUBJECT PROPERTY STATE LANDS .,' tt + "l t kr a eiMiz. It x .qty j.� � �_'�•��,� �' F ,� "`� } s f 1� 7 M1 lar UluY , 4 � d Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal BCC Review Materials ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT HACIENDA LAKES DRI /MPUD COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Revised May 2011 Prepared For: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 3921 Prospect Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 (904) 762 -4454 Prepared By: Passarella & Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274 -0067 Project No. OIMTT737 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction...................................................................................................... ..............................1 10.02.02 (A) 4. Information Required for Application a. Applicant Information .................................................................... ..............................1 b. Mapping and Support Graphics ..................................................... ..............................1 C. Project Description and GMP Consistency Determination ............ ..............................6 d. Native Vegetation Preservation ..................................................... .............................10 e. Wetlands ........................................................................................ .............................16 f. Surface and Ground Water Management ....................................... .............................22 g. Listed Species ................................................................................ .............................27 h. Other .............................................................................................. .............................37 References........................................................................................................ .............................39 1 LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure1. Project Location Map ............................................................... ..............................2 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. FLUCFCS Types and Acreages ............................................... ..............................3 Table2. Soil Types ................................................................................ ..............................5 Table 3. Native Vegetation Habitat Type and Acreages ........................ .............................11 Table 4. Native Vegetation Preservation Summary ............................... .............................14 Table 5. SFWMD /Collier County Wetlands and OSW ......................... .............................17 Table 6. Nail Elevations for Wetland Water Level Indicators ............... .............................18 Table 7. Listed Wildlife Species Observed on the Hacienda Lakes DRI /MPUD Property.................................................................................. ............................... 28 Table 8. Listed Plant Species Observed on the Hacienda Lakes DRUMPUD Property................................................................................... ..............................3 2 Table 9. Listed Wildlife That Could Potentially Occur on the Hacienda Lakes DRUMPUDProperty ............................................................... .............................32 Table 10. Listed Plants That Could Potentially Occur on the Hacienda Lakes DRUMPUDProperty ............................................................... .............................34 iii LIST OF EXHIBITS Page Exhibit1. Resumes .............................................................................. ............................... El-1 Exhibit 2. Aerial with FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map ............................. ...........................E2 -1 Exhibit 3. FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map ................................................ ...........................E3 -1 Exhibit 4. Wetland Topographic Map ..................................................... ...........................E4 -1 Exhibit5. Soils Map ................................................................................ ...........................E5 -1 Exhibit 6. Conceptual Water Management Plan ...................................... ...........................E6 -1 TAW Exhibit 7. Public Facilities Map .............................................................. ...........................E7 -1 Exhibit 8. Transportation Map ................................................................. ...........................E8 -1 Exhibit 9. MPUD Master Plan ................................................................. ...........................E9 -1 Exhibit 10. Aerial with On -Site and Adjacent Preserve Map .............. ............................... E10-1 Exhibit 11. Project Location with Land Use Designations ....................... ..........................El 1-1 Exhibit 12. Upland and Wetland Preserve Map .................................. ............................... E12-1 Exhibit 13. Aerial with Survey Transects and Listed Species Locations . ..........................E13 -1 Exhibit 14. FLUCFCS Descriptions .................................................... ............................... E14-1 1v List of Exhibits (Continued) Page Exhibit 15. Native Vegetation Map .......................................................... ..........................E15 -1 Exhibit 16. Special Treatment Overlay Map ....................................... ............................... E16-1 Exhibit 17. Wetland Quality Maps ...................................................... ............................... E17-1 Exhibit 18. Floodplain Analysis by Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc ...................... E18-1 Exhibit 19. CD Containing Harvey Harper Water Quality Analysis and Phase I Site Assessment Report and Preliminary Site Assessment Report by Ardaman & Associates, Inc ................................... ..........................E19 -1 Exhibit 20. Red - Cockaded Woodpecker Cavity Tree and Foraging Survey Summary (2003 -2004) for Toll- Rattlesnake DRUMPUD ..... ..........................E20 -1 C Exhibit 21. Red - Cockaded Woodpecker Non - Nesting and Nesting Seasons Foraging Surveys Summary (2009 -2010) for Hacienda Lakes ........................ E21 -1 1„ Exhibit 22. Florida Bonneted Bat Survey Summary ................................. ..........................E22 -1 Exhibit 23. Documented Occurrences of Listed Species .......................... ..........................E23 -1 Exhibit 24. Development Plan with Listed Species Locations ................. ..........................E24 -1 Exhibit 25. Summary of Native Vegetation Preserves by Listed Species Habitat ..............E25 -1 Exhibit 26. Preserve Area Management Plan ...................................... ............................... E26 -1 Exhibit 27. Listed Species Management Plan .......................................... ..........................E27 -1 v List of Exhibits (Continued) Page Exhibit 28. USFWS Comment Letter Dated November 2, 2010 .............. ..........................E28 -1 Exhibit 29. Archaeological and Historical Survey Report ........................ ..........................E29 -1 Exhibit 30. Letter from the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources ........................................... ..........................E30 -1 vi INTRODUCTION This report represents the Collier County Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Hacienda Lakes of Naples Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) (Project), formerly the Toll- Rattlesnake DRI/MPUD. This EIS has been prepared in accordance with Chapter 10.02.02(A) of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) (October 30, 1991, as amended February 27, 2004). 10.02.02 (A) 4. INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR APPLICATION a. Applicant Information i. Responsible person who wrote the EIS and his /her education and job related environmental experience. Kenneth C. Passarella and Cheryl Rolph, Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI) Consulting Ecologists. Copies of Mr. Passarella's and Ms. Rolph's resumes are enclosed as Exhibit 1. ii. Owner(s)/agent(s) name, address, phone number, and e -mail address. Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 3921 Prospect Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 Phone: (904) 762 -4454 Contact Name: David Torres E -mail: David @flstardevelopment.com b. Mapping and Support Graphics i. General location map. A Project location map is provided as Figure 1. ii. Native habitats and their boundaries shall be identified on an aerial photograph of the site extending at least two hundred (200) feet outside the parcel boundary. This does not mean the applicant is required to go onto adjoining properties. Habitat identification consistent with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999) shall be depicted on an aerial photograph having a scale of one inch equal to at least 200 feet when available from the county. Other scale aerials may be used where appropriate for the size of the project, provided the photograph and overlays are legible at the scale provided. A legend for each of the FLUCFCS categories found on -site shall be included on the aerial. 0 Gulf of Mexico 1 s J I r -- 1 It IE:11 I09`T R :Y FIGURE 1. PROJECT LOCATION MAP HACIENDA LAKES 2 KEY WEST PROJECT LOCATION SEC 11,12,13,14,23,24,25, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E SEC 19,30, TWP 50 S, RGE 27 E F.L., W.C. 9/21/09 REVIEWEDBY DATE PASSARELLA C.G.R. 9/21/09 „ REVISED DATE & ASSOCIATES 7 HmI�,KLsr An Aerial with FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map is enclosed as Exhibit 2. A FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map of the Project site is provided as Exhibit 3 and an acreage breakdown of the habitat types is provided in Table 1. Table 1. FLUCFCS Types and Acreages FLUCFCS Description Acreage Percent Code of Total 180 Recreational 79.89 3.5 212 Unimproved Pasture 9.14 0.4 260 Rural Open Land 10.54 0.5 262 Low Pasture, H dric 54.43 2.4 3219 E1 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed 27.81 1.2 0 -24% Exotics 3219 E2 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed 12.60 0.6 25 -49% Exotics 3219 E3 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed 3.71 0.2 50 -75% Exotics 3219 E4 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed 5.75 0.3 76 -100% Exotics 4119 E 1 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 90.01 4.0 4119 E2 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 143.78 6.4 25 -49% Exotics 4119 E3 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 23.49 1.0 50 -75% Exotics 4119 E4 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 0.35 <0.1 76 -100% Exotics 4159 E2 Pine, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics 6.77 0.3 4159 E3 Pine, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics 10.78 0.5 4159 E4 Pine, Disturbed 76 -100% Exotics 6.47 0.3 4221 Brazilian Pepper, H dric 1.81 0.1 424 Melaleuca 13.70 0.6 4241 Melaleuca, H dric 345.07 15.3 4269 E1 Tropical Hardwood Hammock, Disturbed 0.40 <0.1 0 -24% Exotics 4269 E2 Tropical Hardwood Hammock, Disturbed 2.25 0.1 25 -49% Exotics 4279 E1 Live Oak, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 3.89 0.2 4279 E2 Live Oak, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics 0.29 <0.1 4289 E1 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 0 -24% ExoticsL 1.20 0.1 4289 E2 Cabba e Palm, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics 19.08 0.8 4289 E3 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics 3.25 0.1 4349 E1 Hardwood/Conifer, Mixed, Disturbed 1.47 0.1 0 -24% Exotics 514 Ditch 3.38 0.1 3 Table 1. (Continued) FLUCFCS Description Acreage Percent Code of Total 6189 El Willow, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 10.97 0.5 6189 E2 Willow, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics 2.48 0.1 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 157.74 7.0 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics 27.66 1.2 6219 E3 Cypress, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics 1.45 0.1 62459 E2 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed and Drained 1.32 0.1 25 -49% Exotics 62459 E3 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed and Drained 2.36 0.1 50 -75% Exotics 6249 E1 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 289.16 12.8 6249 E2 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics 327.32 14.5 6249 E3 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics 258.23 11.4 6249 E4 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 76 -100% Exotics 27.86 1.2 624B E2 Pine/Cypress, Burned 25 -49% Exotics 22.90 1.0 624B E3 Pine/Cypress, Burned 50 -75% Exotics 9.56 0.4 6259 E1 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 31.52 1.4 6259 E2 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics 27.86 1.2 6259 E3 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics 63.26 2.8 6259 E4 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 76 -100% Exotics 12.00 0.5 625B E3 Hydric Pine, Burned 50 -75% Exotics 1.22 0.1 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 6289 El 0 -24% Exotics 2.64 0.1 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 6289 E2 25 -49% Exotics 6.94 0.3 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 6289 E3 50 -75% Exotics 2.09 0.1 Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed 6309 E1 0 -24% Exotics) 19.90 0.9 Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed 6309 E2 25 -49% Exotics) 7.21 0.3 Wetland Shrub, Disturbed 6319 E3 50 -75% Exotics) 5.83 0.3 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 6419 E 1 0 - 24% Exotics 6.82 0.3 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 6419 E2 25 -49% Exotics 10.63 0.5 740 Disturbed Land 3.21 0.1 7401 Disturbed Land, Hydric 18.16 0.8 742 Borrow Area 5.38 0.2 743 Spoil 0.16 <0.1 747 Berm 0.93 <0.1 Table 1. (Continued) FLUCFCS Code Description Acreage Percent of Total 814 Road 0.32 <0.1 8146 Unpaved Road 4.33 0.2 830 Utilities 1.08 <0.1 8301 Utilities, H dric 4.82 0.2 832 Powerline Easement 1.24 0.1 8321 Powerline Easement, H dric 4.27 0.2 Totals 2,262.14 100.0 iii. Topographic map and existing drainage patterns if applicable. Where possible, elevations within each of FLUCFCS categories shall be provided. Please see the Wetland Topographic Map provided as Exhibit 4. iv. Soils map at scale consistent with that used for FDOT — FL UCFCS determinations. A Collier County soils map for the Project is provided as Exhibit 5 and a description of these soils is provided in Table 2. Table 2. Soil Types Soil Unit Description 2 Holo aw Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum 10 Oldsmar Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum 14 Pineda Fine Sand, Limestone Substratum 21 Boca Fine Sand 22 Chosee, Winder, and Gator Soils, De ressional 25 Boca, Riviera, Limestone Substratum, and Copeland Fine Sands, De ressional 38 Urban Land — Matlacha —Boca Complex 49 Hallandale and Boca Fine Sands V. Proposed drainage plan indicating basic flow patterns, outfall and off -site drainage. Please see the Conceptual Water Management Plan enclosed as Exhibit 6. vi. Development plan including phasing program, service area of existing and proposed public facilities, and existing and proposed transportation network in the impact area. The backbone stormwater management facilities consisting of lakes, interconnects, and control structures, along with developer commitments will be constructed first as 5 a single phase. The residential development pods will be permitted and constructed in accordance with prevailing market and sales conditions. Please see the Public Facilities Map (Exhibit 7), the Transportation Map (Exhibit 8), and the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit 9). vii. Site plan showing preserves on -site, and how they align with preserves on adjoining and neighboring properties. Include on the plan locations of proposed and existing development, roads, and areas for storm water retention, as shown on approved master plans for these sites, as well as public owned conservations lands, conservation acquisition area, major flow -ways and potential wildlife corridors. Please see the Project's Master Plan enclosed as Exhibit 9 and an Aerial with On -Site and Adjacent Preserve Map enclosed as Exhibit 10. viii. For properties in the Rural Lands Stewardship Area and Rural Fringe Mixed -Use (RFMU) Districts, a site plan showing the location of the site, and land use designations and overlays as identified in the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Please see the map enclosed as Exhibit 11 which depicts the Project location with land use designations. Portions of the Project are within the Collier County Urban Residential Fringe (URF) Sub - District (zero to one mile east of County Road (CR) 951), the RFMU District Sending Lands (over one mile east of CR 951), and a designated mixed -use activity center at the intersection of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The Project site currently supports the Florida Sports Park (Swamp Buggy) and Collier County Sheriffs Junior Deputy Facility located in the central portion of the site. C. Project Description and GMP Consistency Determination i. Provide an overall description of the project with respect to environmental and water management issues. The Project is 2,262.14± acres and is located in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, and 25; Township 50 South; Range 26 East and Sections 19 and 30; Township 50 South; Range 27 East; Collier County (Figure 1). The Project generally lies along the east side of CR 951 (Collier Boulevard) extending one and a half miles to the east at its northern end and extending three miles to the east at its southern end. Approximately two - thirds of the property lies north of Sabal Palm Road and one -third south of Sabal Palm Road. The Willow Run Quarry is along the northern property boundary and scattered single - family residences and the Winding Cypress DRI are along the southern property boundary. The Picayune Strand State Forest is to the east. The Florida Sports Park (Swamp Buggy) and Collier County Sheriffs Junior Deputy Facility are located in the central portion of the property at the eastern end of the extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. There is a 170± foot Florida Power & Light (FPL) easement that runs north and south along the western portion of the property. An existing farm field is located north of Sabal Palm Road on the eastern roll portion of the property. The remaining portions of the site are undeveloped lands. A Amok 45± acre out parcel owned by the state is located within the eastern portion of the property. An aerial of the Project site is attached as Exhibit 2. The proposed Project is a master planned, mixed -use residential and commercial community that will include single- and multi - family residences, a clubhouse with recreational amenities, and commercial development. In general, the site plan was designed to preserve the higher quality uplands and wetlands and to locate development areas within lower quality exotic infested habitats. Please see the enclosed Upland and Wetland Preserve Map (Exhibit 12). Of the 2,262.14± acres on the Project site, 540.17± acres are not considered native vegetation as defined by Policy 6.1.1(1) of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Those habitats not included as native vegetation include recreational, open water, cleared lands, and habitats which have a canopy strata (or highest existing vegetative strata) comprised of less than 25 percent native vegetation. The Project contains 1,752.72± acres of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) wetlands and 17.85± acres of "other surface waters" (OSW). The wetlands consist of freshwater systems. The level of exotics found within the wetlands range from relatively exotic free habitats to near monocultures of melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Most notable is the heavy infestation on portions of the property by melaleuca; an exotic species listed as a Category I invasive exotic by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (EPPC) (EPPC 2009). In general, the habitats on the Project site have a high degree of infestation by melaleuca on the western and central portions of the property. The melaleuca infestation generally decreases towards the eastern portion of the property. The following listed wildlife species were observed on the Project site: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), snowy egret (Egretta thula), little blue heron (Egretta caerulea), tri- colored heron (Egretta tricolor), roseate spoonbill (Ajaia ajaja), white ibis (Endocumis albus), wood stork (Mycteria americana), red - cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), and Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus). In addition to the observed listed species, sign (i.e., tracks, scat, burrows) of two listed species, the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) and Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) were identified. Aerials showing survey transects and listed species locations are included as Exhibit 13. The following listed plant species were observed on the Project site: stiff - leaved wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), giant airplant (Tillandsia utriculata), butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis), and cowhorn orchid (Cyrtopodium punctatum). The wetlands with greater than 50 percent coverage by exotics are generally located on the western and central portions of the property. The melaleuca infestation 7 generally decreases towards the eastern portion of the property. Since the site plan was designed to avoid impacts to the higher quality uplands and wetlands, the development areas are generally located on the western portions of the property. The upland and wetland preserves are located along the east and south portions of the Project site where the higher quality habitats occur. The site plan preserves approximately 70 percent of the total Project site. To avoid and minimize wetland impacts, the Project has considered several different site designs. The site plan was designed to preserve the higher quality habitats on -site and to locate development areas within the lower quality exotic infested habitats. Specifically, the site plan minimizes impacts to the higher quality wetlands and uplands on the east portion of the site adjacent to Picayune Strand State Forest. In addition to minimizing impacts to the higher quality wetlands and uplands on -site, the site plan also minimizes impacts to listed species found on -site. The on -site preserves were designed to connect to off -site preserves retaining connectivity of wildlife habitat. Where feasible, the site plan design buffers the preserves by locating lower intensity land uses, such as lakes, adjacent to the preserves. The lakes will buffer the preserves from the residential development. Also, the lakes will provide open water that will provide additional wildlife habitat. It is estimated that the construction of the Project will result in wetland impacts to 440.02± acres of on -site wetlands and 9.38± acres of OSW. As discussed previously, the wetland impacts are mostly limited to the lower quality wetlands on -site. Please refer to Exhibit 9 for the site plan. The mitigation plan for the Project preserves 1,589.97± acres (70 percent) of the property. Of this acreage, 1,544.14± acres will be used to offset unavoidable impacts to SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands and will be placed under conservation easement. The mitigation plan involves the enhancement and preservation of 1,281.25± acres of wetlands, 259.83± acres of upland preserves and upland buffers, wetland restoration through the backfilling of 2.74± acres of ditches (OSWs), and preservation of 0.32± acre of OSW. Several access easements and right -of -way (ROW) for Sabal Palm Road occur within the Project's preserve areas. Hand removal of exotic vegetation will be conducted within the access easements and ROWs; however, the access easements and ROWs, which total 45.83± acres, will not be used for mitigation of wetland impacts, and will not be placed under conservation easement. Wetlands within the preserve area that will not be used for mitigation total 31.45± acres. Upland preserve not used for mitigation totals 8.97± acres. Wetland enhancement will include the removal of exotic vegetation. Exotic vegetation to be removed includes melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and downy rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosus). Exotic vegetation removal will be done by hand. In general, the exotics will be treated in place with an appropriate herbicide and left standing, or exotics will be cut, the cut vegetation removed or stacked in place, and the remaining stump treated with an appropriate herbicide. Supplemental plantings will be installed in areas of greater than 50 percent exotic coverage. Currently, the storm runoff produced from the area between the FPL easement and the Henderson Creek Canal sheet flows toward the west and ultimately into the canal. Sabal Palm Road runs east to west throughout the width of the Project. This creates another unnatural sheet flow barrier which drains runoff towards both the canal and the easterly wetlands. The majority of the storm runoff created from the remainder of the site sheet flows to the east from the property edges to the main wetland located in the middle of the property. This vast wetland stretches into the Project and expands as it moves to the east. As the runoff moves more towards the east, the flow direction gradually changes and becomes more southeastern to southern. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map, the Project is located in a flood zone "X" with no related minimum elevation. The site varies topographically from 6.2 to 13.0 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). The Project is located within the Henderson Creek Basin which has a maximum discharge rate of 0.15 cfs /acre. Seasonal water elevations for the preserved wetlands will be maintained by routing surface water flows from the proposed development areas through stormwater management facilities into the wetlands. One technique used to determine the control elevations for the stormwater management system was established based on the elevations of the biological indicators of wetland water levels. These indicators were compared with data collected from on -site water level monitoring wells. These design features will ensure that surface water levels within the preserved wetlands are maintained. ii. Explain how the project is consistent with each of the Objectives and Policies in the CCME of the GMP, where applicable. The Project will implement Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) through the use of clustered development and utilization of the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program within the RFMU District. The Project will implement the Density Blending provisions ofthe FLUE as follows: (a) The project must straddle the URF Sub - District and the RFMU District Sending Lands; (b) The project in aggregate must be a minimum of 400 acres; (c) At least 25 percent of the project must be located within the URF Sub - District. The project must extend central water and sewer (from the Urban designated portion of the project) to serve the entire project, unless alternative interim sewer and water provisions are authorized by Collier County; (d) The project is currently zoned or will be zoned Planned Unit Development; (e) The density to be shifted to the Sending Lands from the URF is to be located on impacted or disturbed lands, or it is demonstrated that the development on the site is to be located so as to preserve and protect the highest quality native vegetation and/or habitat on -site and to maximize the connectivity of such 0 native vegetation and /or wildlife habitat with adjacent preservation and /or habitat areas; (f) The Urban portion of the project shall comply with the native vegetation requirements identified in the CCME (for Urban designated lands). For those lands within the project designated as Sending, the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be 90 percent of the native vegetation, not to exceed 60 percent of the total project area designated as Sending. Wetland areas that are impacted through the development process, but which result in enhanced wetland function, including habitat and /or flow -ways, shall be considered as part of the native vegetation requirement set forth in this provision and shall not be considered as impacted areas. These wetland areas and /or flow -ways may be used for water storage provided that the water discharged in these areas is pre- treated; and (g) Permitted uses for density blending under this provision include residential development and associated amenities, including golf courses meeting the criteria for golf courses within the Neutral area. This provision is not intended to eliminate any uses permitted within the applicable underlying land use designation. The Project will implement Policy 2.2.2. of the CCME through the utilization of the Best Management Practices Matrix currently being promulgated by the SFWMD. The native vegetation provisions of the Project implement Policy 6.1.2 of the CCME in that native preserves will be incorporated into the Project design. The Project will implement Policy 6.2.3. of the CCME, wherein the majority of the on -site lands within the Natural Resource Protection Area will be protected through conservation easement, and will have the opportunity to utilize the TDR program set forth in the RFMU District of the FLUE. The Project is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as may be required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. d. Native Vegetation Preservation Identify the acreage and community type of all upland and wetland habitats found on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS. Provide a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified on -site by vegetation type (species), vegetation composition (canopy, midstory, and ground cover), and vegetation dominance (dominant, common, and occasional). The FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map for the Project is included as Exhibit 3. A description of each FLUCFCS type with the acreage of this habitat type identified on the Project site is listed as Exhibit 14. 10 The Project has a total of 1,721.97± acres of native vegetation habitat (URF and RFMU District portions combined). County staff conducted a site visit of the property on August 9, 2006 and pointed out that certain areas mapped as native vegetation have a high enough percentage of melaleuca in the canopy to be categorized as non - native vegetation. As a result of this site visit and guidance from county staff, the areas affected by the April 2006 wildfire were re- mapped and the FLUCFCS map was revised. Due to wildfires on the Project site, there are large areas in which the slash pine trees and cypress trees did not survive leaving only melaleuca trees in the canopy. In some areas all canopy trees were destroyed by the wildfire and a heavy recruitment of melaleuca has resulted in the ground cover. These areas do not meet the native vegetation criteria and have been reclassified as either Melaleuca (FLUCFCS Code 424) or Melaleuca, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 4241). A Native Vegetation Map of the Project is provided as Exhibit 15 and an acreage breakdown of these native habitats is provided in Table 3. Table 3. Native Vegetation Habitat Type and Acreages 11 Non - Native FLUCFCS Habitat Vegetation Native Code Vegetation Acreage Acreage 180 Recreational 79.89 212 Unimproved Pasture 9.14 260 Rural Open Land 10.54 262 Low Pasture, H dric 54.43 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed 3219 E1 (0 -24% Exotics) 27.81 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed 3219 E2 12.60 (25 -49% Exotics) Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed 3219 E3 3.71 (50 -75% Exotics) Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed 3219 E4 (76 -100% Exotics 5.75 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 4119 E1 (0 -24% Exotics) 90.01 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 4119 E2 143.78 (25 -49% Exotics) Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 4119 E3 23.49 50 -75% Exotics) Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed 4119 E4 (76 -100% Exotics) 0.35 4159 E2 Pine, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) 6.77 4159 E3 Pine, Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) 10.78 4159 E4 Pine, Disturbed (76 -100% Exotics) 6.47 11 Table 3. (Continued) 12 Native Non - FLUCFCS Habitat Vegetation Native Code Vegetation Acreage Acreage 4221 Brazilian Pepper, H dric 1.81 424 Melaleuca 13.70 4241 Melaleuca, H dric 345.07 Tropical Hardwood Hammock, 4269 E1 Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) 0.40 Tropical Hardwood Hammock, 4269 E2 Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) 2.25 4279 E1 Live Oak, Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) 3.89 4279 E2 Live Oak, Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) 0.29 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 4289 E1 0 -24% Exotics) 1.20 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 4289 E2 (25 -49% Exotics) 19.08 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 4289 E3 50 -75% Exotics) 3.25 Hardwood - Conifer, Mixed, Disturbed 4349 E1 (0 -24% Exotics) 1.47 514 Ditch 3.38 6189 E1 Willow, Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) 10.97 6189 E2 Willow, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) 2.48 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) 157.74 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) 27.66 6219 E3 Cypress, Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) 1.45 Pine /Cypress, Drained, Disturbed 62459 E2 (25 -49% Exotics) 1.32 62459 E3 Pine /Cypress, Drained, Disturbed 2.36 (50 -75% Exotics) 6249 E1 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) 289.16 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 6249 E2 (25 -49% Exotics) 327.32 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 6249 E3 (50 -75% Exotics) 258.24 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 6249 E4 (76 -100% Exotics) 27.85 624B E2 Pine/Cypress, Burned (25 -49% Exotics) 22.90 624B E3 Pine/Cypress, Burned (50 -75% Exotics) 9.56 6259 E1 H dric Pine, Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) 31.52 6259 E2 H dric Pine, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) 27.86 6259 E3 H dric Pine, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics) 63.26 12 Table 3. (Continued) Exotic plant species coverage was evaluated according to canopy coverage or the highest vegetative strata in the native habitats designated by a FLUCFCS code followed by "E4" (76 -100% Exotics); therefore these habitats were excluded from the native vegetation preservation requirement pursuant to Policy 6. 1.1 of the CCME. ii. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in Goal 6 of the CCME of the GMP, and Division 3.9 of the LDC. 13 Non - Native FLUCFCS Native Habitat Vegetation Code Vegetation Acreage Acreage Hydric Pine, Disturbed 6259 E4 12.00 (76 -100% Exotics) 625B E3 Hydric Pine, Burned (50 -75% Exotics) 1.22 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 6289 E1 2.64 (0 -24% Exotics) Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 6289 E2 6.94 25 -49% Exotics) Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 6289 E3 2.09 (50 -75% Exotics) Wetland Forested Mixed Disturbed 6309 El 19.90 0 -24% Exotics) Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed 6309 E2 7.21 (25 -49% Exotics) Wetland Shrub, Disturbed 6319 E3 5.83 (50 -75% Exotics) Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 6419 E 1 6.82 (0 -24% Exotics) Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 6419 E2 10.63 (25 -49% Exotics) 740 Disturbed Land 3.21 7401 Disturbed Land, Hydric 18.16 742 Borrow Area 5.38 743 Spoil 0.16 747 Berm 0.93 814 Road 0.32 8146 Unpaved Road 4.33 830 Utilities 1.08 8301 Utilities, Hydric 4.82 832 Powerline Easement 1.24 8321 Powerline Easement, Hydric 4.27 Totals 1,721.97 540.17 Exotic plant species coverage was evaluated according to canopy coverage or the highest vegetative strata in the native habitats designated by a FLUCFCS code followed by "E4" (76 -100% Exotics); therefore these habitats were excluded from the native vegetation preservation requirement pursuant to Policy 6. 1.1 of the CCME. ii. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in Goal 6 of the CCME of the GMP, and Division 3.9 of the LDC. 13 Provide an exhibit illustrating such. Include calculations identifying the acreage for i preservation and impact, per FLUCFCS category. Pursuant to Policy 6.1.2 of the CCME of the Collier County GMP, Sub - Section 2.05.02.B.2.g, and Section 3.05.07 of the Collier County LDC, a minimum of 25 percent of the Project's native vegetation is required to be retained within the URF Sub - District. For those portions of the Project within the RFMU District Sending lands, the native vegetation preservation requirement is 90 percent of the native vegetation, not to exceed 60 percent of the total Project area designated as Sending. The total Project area within the URF boundary is 625.07± acres. Of this acreage, a total of 295.38± acres are considered native vegetation. The total Project area located within designated RFMU District lands is 1,637.07± acres, of which 1,426.59± acres is considered native vegetation. Access easements and right -of -ways (ROWs) exist on the Project site and are shown on the MPUD Master Plan (Exhibit 9). These access easements and ROWs will be retained and the native vegetation within the easements has been excluded from the native vegetation preserve requirements. At the request of Collier County, native vegetation within the existing on -site easements and the five recorded archaeological sites and the access paths provided for the archaeological sites has been excluded from the native vegetation preserve requirement calculations. The access easements, ROWs, and archaeological sites and access paths total 21.43± acres. The Project preserves 40.81± acres of the native vegetation within a 53.06± acre preserve tract the URF portion. The 12.24± acres of non - native habitats within the URF preserve area will be enhanced by the exotic vegetation removal and supplemental planting of native vegetation. In the RFMU District portion of the Project, 1,352.57± acres of native vegetation will be in a 1,491.08± acre preserve tract. Table 4 summarizes the native vegetation preservation for the Project. Table 4. Native Vegetation Preservation Summary Description Total URF RFMU Project Total Project Area 2,262.14 625.07 1,637.07 On -Site Native Vegetation Acreage 1,721.97 295.38 1,426.59 Native Vegetation within Access Easements, ROWS, and Archaeological 21.43 8.51 12.92 Sites Native Vegetation For Requirement Calculations 1,700.54 286.87 1,413.67 Percentage of Native Vegetation Required - 25% Required Native Vegetation Preservation Acreage < 919.91 71.71 < 848.20 14 Table 4. (Continued) Description Total URF RFMU Project Preserved Native 1,393.38 40.81 1,352.57 Vegetation Acreage** Total Preserve Area (to be placed 1,544.14 53.06 19491.08 under conservation easement *Native Preserve Requirement (LDC Subsection 2.05.02 2.g.ii.) of 90% within the RFMU District Sending Lands exceeds 60% of the total project RFMU District Sending Lands. Therefore, over 60% of the total project RFMU District Sending Lands shall be the required Rural native vegetation area. * *Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H.l.a., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of a minimum of 12.24 acres of the project's URF Sub - District Preserve Tract. Compliance with 100% of the native vegetation preservation requirement shall be achieved through preserving RFMU District project native vegetation in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Sub - District project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. Table 4 reflects the required and provided native preserves and has been included on the MPUD Master Plan. The LDC provides that only 75 percent of the required native preserve be demonstrated at the time of rezoning, with full compliance required at development order review. Compliance with LDC Subsection 3.05.07 H. La., requires native vegetation planting enhancement of the Project's URF preserve tract. The Project will enhance 12.24± acres of non - native vegetation within the URF preserve tract through removal of exotics and supplemental native plantings. Compliance with 100 percent of the native vegetation preservation requirement will be achieved through preserving native vegetation within the Project's RFMU District portion in an amount two times the deficient native vegetation preserve acreage in the URF Project lands as is provided for through the adopted GMP amendment. The Project preserves 95 percent of the total RFMU District Sending Lands native vegetation (excluding native vegetation within easements and ROWs), which is approximately 35 percent more than what is required by the LDC and GMP. Density bonuses are provided for by the CCME (Policy 6.2.5(6)b) and the LDC (Section 3.05.07.F.4.b) where projects create, enhance or restore habitat for listed species. Hacienda Lakes proposes the enhancement of 129.88± acres of non - native preserve area by hand removing exotic vegetation, hauling the exotic vegetative debris from the preserve areas, and planting native tree, shrub and ground cover species. An additional 20.91± acres of non - native vegetation within the preserve area will be restored to native wetland habitat. This area, currently a monoculture of hydric melaleuca, is proposed to be mechanically cleared, graded to wetland elevations, and planted with native wetland species. Further proposed wetland restoration consists of clearing, grading and planting 54.25± acres of existing wet pasture. The grading plans for the 20.91± acres and 54.25± acres include the establishment of marshes for wading bird foraging habitat. These marshes will be graded to varying depths to allow the concentration of prey for wading birds, 15 including the endangered wood stork, at alternating times of the year as water levels seasonally rise and recede. In total, 150.79± acres of non - native area and 54.25± acres of wet pasture will be enhanced and restored to native habitats. These enhanced native habitats will provide benefits for listed wildlife species in the area, including the wood stork, state - listed wading birds, Big Cypress fox squirrel, Florida black bear, and Florida panther. The preserved, enhanced, and restored wetlands and uplands, excluding ROWS and access easements, will be placed in a conservation easement. An Upland and Wetland Preserve Map of the Project is provided as Exhibit 12. iii. For sites already cleared and in agricultural use, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation in Policy 6 1.5 of the CCME of the GMP and Division 3.9 of the LDC. For sites cleared prior to January 2003, provide documentation that the parcels) are in compliance with the ten year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP and LDC. A portion of the Project site, located in Section 24, Township 50, Range 26, along the north side of Sabal Palm Road is currently cleared and used as pasture. Based on a review of historic aerials, it appears this area was cleared prior to November 1996. The applicant has been unable to locate the agricultural clearing permit (ACP) and has decided not to pursue obtaining an after - the -fact ACP. As such, the cleared agricultural areas have been included in the native vegetation for requirement calculations. iv. Have preserves or acreage requirements for preservation previously been identified for the site during previous development order approvals? Ifso, identify the location and acreage of these preserves, and provide an explanation if they are differentfrom what is proposed. There is an existing Collier County conservation easement for 10.77± acres located on the parcel currently occupied by the Junior Deputy facility. This conservation easement area will continue to be preserved and has been incorporated into the Project's preserve tract. V. For properties with Special Treatment (ST) overlays, show the ST overlay on the development plan and provide an explanation as to why these are being impacted or preserved. A map with the ST overlays for the Project is provided as Exhibit 16. e. Wetlands Define the number of acres of Collier County jurisdictional wetlands (pursuant to Policy 62.1 and 62.2 of the CCME of the GMP) according to the FLUCFCS. 16 ® Include a description of each of the FLUCFCS categories identified on -site by vegetation type (species), vegetation composition (canopy, midstory, and ground cover), and vegetation dominance (dominant, common, and occasional). Wetland determinations are required to be verified by the SFWMD or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), prior to submission to the County. The Project site includes 1,752.72± acres of SFWMD /Collier County-jurisdictional wetlands and 17.85± acres of SFWMD /Collier County OSWs (Exhibit 3). The SFWMD wetland lines on the Project site were field verified and approved by the SFWMD during site visits on March 10 and April 12, 1999; July 16, 2001; January 24, June 5, and June 20, 2002; and January 30 and May 23, 2003. A portion of the Project site, where the Florida Sports Park is currently located, was permitted by the SFWMD in April 1986 (SFWMD Permit No. 11- 00348 -P). A formal jurisdictional determination is being sought as part of the new Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) application for Hacienda Lakes. In August through December 2009, the wetland lines were re- flagged in the field and surveyed. During the processing of the ERP application the wetland lines will be re- verified by the SFWMD. Table 5 provides a breakdown of the wetland and OSW acreage for the site, and a description of each wetland FLUCFCS type is included in Exhibit 14. Table 5. SFWMD /Collier County Wetlands and OSW FLUCFCS Code Habitat Acreage 262 Low Pasture, H dric 54.43 4221 Brazilian Pepper, H dric 1.81 4241 Melaleuca, H dric 345.07 514 Ditch 3.38 6189 E1 Willow, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 10.97 6189 E2 Willow, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics 2.48 6219 E 1 Cypress, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 157.74 6219 E2 Cypres s, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics 27.66 6219 E3 Cypress, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics 1.45 6249 E 1 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 289.16 6249 E2 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 25- 49% Exotics 327.32 6249 E3 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics 258.23 6249 E4 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 76 -100% Exotics 27.86 624B E2 Pine/Cypress, Burned 25 -49% Exotics 22.90 624B E3 Pine/Cypress, Burned 50 -75% Exotics 9.56 6259 E1 H dric Pine, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 31.52 6259 E2 H dric Pine, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics 27.86 6259 E3 H dric Pine, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics 63.26 6259 E4 H dric Pine, Disturbed 76 -100% Exotics) 12.00 625B E3 H dric Pine, Burned 50 -75% Exotics 1.22 6289 E1 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics 2.64 17 Table 5. (Continued) FLUCFCS Habitat Acreage Code 19 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed No. 1 6289 E2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 6.94 (25 -49% Exotics) Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.95 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed 18 -1 6289 E3 9.93 2.09 18 -2 (50 -75% Exotics) 9.98 (West) Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 6309 E1 19.90 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca (0 -24% Exotics) No. 18 16 -2 Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed 9.48 6309 E2 16 -3 7.21 9.40 (25 -49% Exotics 6319 E3 Wetland Shrub, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics) 5.83 6419 E1 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics) 6.82 6419 E2 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 25 -49% Exotics) 10.63 7401 Disturbed Land, H dric 18.16 742 Borrow Area 5.38 8301 Utilities, H dric 4.82 8321 Powerline Easement, H dric 4.27 Totals 1,770.57 ii. Determine seasonal and historic high water levels utilizing lichen lines or other *4W biological indicators. Indicate how the project design improves /affects predevelopment hydroperiods. Provide a narrative addressing the anticipated control elevations) for the site. Nails marking biological indicators (i.e., lichen lines, adventitious rooting, buttress on cypress trees, etc.) of wetland seasonal water levels were set in the field. The nail elevations were subsequently surveyed by Banks Engineering, Inc. A summary of the nail elevations is provided as Table 6. Table 6. Nail Elevations for Wetland Water Level Indicators Wetland Nail No. Description Nail Elevation (Ft NVGD) 19 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 10.07 No. 1 19 -2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.99 19 -3 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.95 18 -1 To of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.93 No. 2 18 -2 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.98 (West) 18 -3 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.94 16 -1 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.39 No. 18 16 -2 To of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.48 16 -3 Jop of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.40 UK Table 6. (Continued) Wetland Nail NoLadventitious Description Nail Elevation (Ft NVGD) 5 -1 rootin on melaleuca 9.09 No. 21 5 -2 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.11 (Southwest) 5 -3 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.23 No. 21 9 -1 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.74 (Southeast 9 -2 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.76 Central) 9 -3 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.75 10 -1 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.43 No. 21 10 -2 To of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.40 (Southeast) 10 -3 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.39 No. 21 11 -1 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.91 (South 11 -2 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.91 Central) 11 -3 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.91 12 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 10.20 12 -2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 10.19 No. 21 12 -3 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 10.15 (Northeast Central) 12 -4 To of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 10.16 12 -5 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 10.06 12 -6 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 10.11 13 -1 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.76 13 -2 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.75 13 -3 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.78 No. 21 14 -1 To of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.92 (Southwest 14 -2 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.92 Central) 14 -3 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.90 15 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.99 15 -2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.94 15 -3 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.98 17 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 10.30 17 -2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 10.25 (North) 17 -3 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 10.22 6 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.00 No. 23 6 -2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 8.92 (Central) 6 -3 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.03 8 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.55 8 -2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.52 No. 23 (Northwest) 8 -3 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.52 8 -4 Top of adventitious rooting on wax myrtle 9.58 19 Table 6. (Continued) Wetland Nail No. Description Nail Elevation (Ft NVGD) No. 23 8 -5 mop of adventitious rooting on wax 9.55 (Northwest) (Continued) 8 -6 op of adventitious rooting on wax mle 9.47 7 -1 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.37 7 -2 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.49 No. 24 7 -3 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.49 (South) 7 -4 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.56 7 -5 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.63 7 -6 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.49 2 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.05 2 -2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.02 No. 27 2 -3 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.09 (West) 2 -4 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 8.95 2 -5 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 8.91 2 -6 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 8.84 3 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.34 3 -2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.33 3 -3 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 9.34 3 -4 To of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.17 No. 27 3 -5 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.01 (Northwest) 3 -6 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 9.09 4 -1 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 8.63 4 -2 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 8.67 4 -3 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 8.76 1 -1 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 8.60 1 -2 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 8.56 No. 32 1 -3 Bottom of lichen line on cypress 8.58 1 -4 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 8.34 1 -5 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 8.47 1 -6 Top of adventitious rooting on melaleuca 8.44 Indicate the proposed percent of defined wetlands to be impacted and the effects of proposed impacts on the functions of these wetlands. Provide an exhibit showing the location of wetlands to be impacted and those to be preserved on -site. Describe how impacts to wetlands have been minimized. 20 The site plan was designed to avoid impacts to the higher quality wetlands. The AAVWA wetlands with greater than 50 percent coverage by exotics are generally located on the west and central portions of the property, and the exotic infestation generally decreases toward the east portion of the property. Therefore, the development areas are generally located on the west and central portions of the property. The wetland preserves are located along the east and south sides of the Project where the higher quality wetlands occur. The site plan preserves approximately 70 percent of the total site. The construction of the Project will result in wetland impacts to 440.02± acres of on- site wetlands and 9.65± acres of OSW. As discussed, these wetland impacts are mostly limited to the lower quality wetlands on -site. The Project's site plan is shown on the MPUD Master Plan included as Exhibit 9. An Upland and Wetland Preserve Map is included as Exhibit 12. To avoid and minimize wetland impacts, the Project has considered several different site designs. The site plan was designed to preserve the higher quality wetlands on- site and to locate development areas within the lower quality melaleuca infested wetlands. Where feasible, the site plan was designed to buffer the large preserves on the eastern portion of the property by locating lower intensity land uses, such as lakes, adjacent to the preserves. The lakes will buffer the preserves from the residential development. Also, the lakes will provide open water that will provide additional wildlife habitat adjacent to the preserves. Where a minimum 15 -foot upland buffer adjacent to wetland preserves is not feasible, structural buffers will be provided. Also, on -site preserves were designed to connect to off -site preserves on adjacent projects (Exhibit 10). Seasonal water elevations for the preserved wetlands will be maintained by routing surface water flows from the proposed development areas through stormwater management facilities into the wetlands. The treated stormwater will be discharged into the wetlands as far "upstream" as possible. Also, control elevations for the stormwater management system will be established based on the elevations of the biological indicators of wetland water levels. These design features will ensure that surface water levels within the preserved wetlands are maintained. In addition to avoiding and minimizing wetland impacts, the Project was designed to minimize secondary impacts to the preserved wetlands as much as possible. Design criteria to minimize secondary impacts include establishing structural buffers or a minimuml5 -foot with an average 25 -foot wide upland buffer adjacent to wetland preserves. iv. Indicate how the project design compensates for wetland impacts pursuant to the Policies and Objectives in Goal 6 of the CCME of the GMP. For sites in the RFMU District, provide an assessment, based on the SFWMD's Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM), that has been accepted by either by the SFWMD or 21 FDEP. For sites outside the RFMUDistrict, and where higher quality wetlands are being retained on -site, provide justification based on the UMAM. The proposed mitigation for wetland impacts is the enhancement and preservation of 1,282.66± acres of on -site wetlands. Exotic vegetation will be removed throughout the preserve and supplemental planting will be conducted in areas where exotic vegetation exceeds 50 percent. The mitigation plan includes the enhancement and preservation of 260.39± acres of upland preserves and upland buffers. Wetland enhancement will include the removal of exotic vegetation including melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia), and downy rose myrtle. In general, in areas with less than 50 percent coverage by exotics, the exotics will be treated in place with an appropriate herbicide and left standing, or exotics will be cut, the cut vegetation removed or stacked in place, and the remaining stump treated with an appropriate herbicide. In areas with greater than 50 percent exotics, the exotics will be removed and supplemental wetland plantings will be installed. In addition, large areas of degraded wetlands with monocultures of melaleuca will be restored through the mechanical removal of exotics, grading to wetland elevations, and planting with native vegetation. The grading plan for these areas includes the establishment of marshes for wading bird foraging habitat. These marshes will be graded to varying depths to allow the concentration of prey for wading birds at alternating times of the year as water levels seasonally rise and recede. The Project is currently under review by the SFWMD. The UMAM analysis will be provided to Collier County once approved by the SFWMD. Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure (WRAP) was prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). The Corps WRAP assessment was previously provided to County staff to assist in review of the Toll- Rattlesnake DRI. A wetland quality map based on the WRAP scores has been provided as Exhibit 17A. A wetland quality map with the URF /RFMU District boundary and the site plan is included as Exhibit 17B. Please note that the SFWMD is reviewing the Project using UMAM, not WRAP. f. Surface and Ground Water Management i. Provide an overall description of the proposed water management system explaining how it works, the basis of design, historical drainage flows, off -site flows coming in to the system and how they will be incorporated in the system or passed around the system, positive outfall availability, Wet Season Water Table and Dry Season Water Table, and how they were determined, and any other pertinent information pertaining to the control of the storm and ground water. 22 ® A SFWMD ERP application for the Project site has been submitted and is currently under review by SFWMD staff. Please refer to SFWMD ERP Application No. 100126 -5 for detailed information regarding the surface water management system. The following information provides an overall description of the water management system. Existing Conditions The Project site is predominantly undeveloped wetlands and agricultural lands. A portion of the site, which is used for recreation purposes, is known as the Sports Park or the Swamp Buggy Days. This area has been previously cleared and developed. There is a 170 foot FPL easement that runs north and south along the western portion of the property. Currently, the storm runoff produced from the area between the FPL easement and the Henderson Creek Canal sheet flows toward the west and ultimately into the canal. Sabal Palm Road runs east to west throughout the width of the Project. This creates another unnatural sheet flow barrier which drains runoff towards both the canal and towards the easterly wetlands. The majority of the storm runoff created from the remainder of the site sheet flows to the east from the property edges to the main wetland located in the middle of the property. This vast wetland stretches into the Project and expands as it moves to the east. As the runoff moves more towards the east, the flow direction gradually changes and becomes more southeastern to southern. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), the Project is located in a flood zone "X" with no related minimum elevation. However, according to Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc. most of the Project site is located in areas designated on the "draft" FIRMs as AH- zones. The AH designation means that the flooding depths during the 100 -year, 3 -day rainfall are less than three feet. A portion of the Project in the southeast is in an AE zone which indicates more than three feet of flood depth during the 100 -year, 3 -day storm. The site varies topographically from 6.2 to 13.0 feet NGVD. The Project is located within the Henderson Creek Basin which has a maximum discharge rate of 0.15 cfs /acre. However, to be consistent with the Belle Meade Study and with Big Cypress Basins request the discharge has been reduced to 0.06 cfs /acre north of Sabal Palm Road, and 0.04 south of Sabal Palm Road. Proposed Water Management Off -site flow will continue to flow to the Henderson Creek Canal, or will head east and south to a large off -site wetland. Floodplain calculations have been performed by Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tomasello's floodplain analysis for the Project is provided as Exhibit 18. Wet season water tables were set based on the Henderson Creek Canal hydrographs, surveyed nails marking the biological indicators of seasonal high water levels set by 23 ® PAI and data collected from the on -site water level monitoring wells. There are multiple control elevations for the Project including a control elevation of 10.0 feet NGVD in the north and central portion of the Project, and a control elevation of 9.5 feet NGVD in the southerly basin. Please refer to SFWMD ERP Application No. 100126 -5 for more detailed information on the Project's proposed control elevations. Water Quality Design Strategy The water management system design utilizes the best management practices recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the FDEP, the SFWMD, and other agencies, which regulate the management and use of surface and groundwater resources. The design provides storm water treatment facilities in excess of the minimum standards used by the SFWMD. Listed below is a summary of the system process and controls incorporated in the design to treat storm water runoff. Pollutant Source Reduction Program The Project will be maintained and operated by a community association or a community development district. This operation entity will manage source reduction programs that will monitor the application and use of potential pollutants into the area served by the surface water management system. The operation entity will be responsible for the proper handling of potential pollutants such as pesticides, herbicides and petroleum distillates. A public community education program will be implemented that will be targeted at providing educational information to the community residents that link their activities to the potential for pollutant distribution. When necessary, to facilitate community education, signage and other informational tools will be used to create an awareness of where the system drainage basins discharge to and will indicate that all drainage facilities ultimately end up in the lakes and surface waters of the natural systems. The program will be focused on reducing the discharge of pollutants into the drainage system by residents by providing education and making people aware of the potential impacts of their activities. Water Quality Treatment Facilities The water management design contains design elements that are intended to provide enhanced water quality treatment in addition to SFWMD minimum standards. Here is a brief listing of some of these facilities. Drainage Collection System Catch Basins — The majority of the project catch basins have been specified to contain a sedimentation sump that is intended to provide the first in a series of opportunities to separate out pollutant particulates and other debris that fall into the project drainage collection system. These catch basins will be routinely cleaned as part of the source reduction program described above. 24 Detention Time — One of the backbone elements of the surface water management system design includes drainage system routings intended to detain the runoff from the developed property. The system of lakes has been interconnected so that the travel time for runoff has been extended to the maximum extent practicable. The design is consistent with both SFWMD criteria and recommendations presented in the report titled Evaluation of Alternative Stormwater Regulations for Southwest Florida. Separation of Roadway Drainage Outfalls and Project Outfalls — Drainage discharges coming from the roadway and other developed lands are not positioned next to project outfalls. This increases detention times and allows for full advantage of all of the treatment provided in the lakes. Lakes, Lake Depth, and Dimensional Criteria — The Project has been designed with many lakes which are consistent with the SFWMD dimensional criteria including lakes that are deep enough to optimize volumetric treatment. Littoral Zones — The lakes will be planted with littoral zone plantings to provide for biological process water quality treatment which will reduce the chemical and biological oxygen demand and further aide in improving water quality. Additional 50 Percent Water Quality Treatment Volume — The system has been designed to provide 50 percent more water quality treatment volume than is required by SFWMD Design Criteria. Spreader Swales at Outfalls — The outfall system has been designed to limit the impact of point discharges into the wetlands. For the outfalls that have a significant discharge, a spreader swale/berm has been added to increase the length of the outfall creating an energy dissipater. The result is the same discharge spread over a larger area. ii. Provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and storm water management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre - development conditions. This analysis is required for projects impacting five (5) or more acres of wetlands. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies. A water quality analysis utilizing the Harvey Harper methodology has been completed as part of the permitting through the SFWMD. A copy of the Harvey Harper water quality analysis prepared by RWA, Inc. is provided on a CD included as Exhibit 19. 25 Identify any Wel j6eld RiskManagement Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM -ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM -STs. Collier County, through its GMP Policy 3.1.1, has codified wellhead protection for public water supply (PWS) wells. Four Wellfield Risk Management Zones are defined in the policy, based on computer modeling to delineate isotravel time contours. Depth of aquifers and confinement from land surface are not considered in the Collier County policy. The protection zones are: W -1 which is between a PWS well and the 1 year isotravel time contour, W -2 which is between the 1 year and 2 year isotravel time contours, W -3 which is between the 2 year and 5 year isotravel time contours, and W -4 which is between the 5 year and 20 year isotravel time contours. Restricted and prohibited land uses are stipulated for each protection zone. Prohibited uses include solid waste disposal facilities in all four protection zones; solid waste transfer and storage facilities within Zone Nos. W -1, W -2, and W -3; hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons within Zone Nos. W -1, W -2, and W -3; petroleum exploration in Zone Nos. W -1 and W -2; septic systems in Zone Nos. W -1, W -2, and W -3; wastewater treatment plants within Zone No. W -1. The County's wellfield protection overlay map, which was generated in 2002, does not include any wellfield protection zones which overlay any portion of the Project. A provision of the County's wellfield protection ordinance provides for C, "periodically" updating the protection zone maps. Since 2002 several new PWS wellfields have been either constructed or permitted in Collier County. The Collier County Utilities' reverse osmosis (RO) supply wellfields permitted by the SFWMD under Water Use Permit No. 11- 00249 -W include a Mid Hawthorn aquifer wellfield consisting of 11 wells located near the western boundary of the northern portion of the Project site. It is anticipated that updated modeling to define isotravel time contours for those new wellfields will result in portions of the Project falling within certain wellfield protection zones. However, none of the identified prohibited land uses are contemplated for the property. In addition to the Collier County wellfield protection ordinance, the State of Florida has codified wellhead protection for PWS wells in Chapter 62 -521 of the Florida Administrative Code (FAC). A 500 -foot radius around each PWS well, regardless of depth of aquifers and confinement from land surface, is established by that rule. Prohibited uses or special requirements, in addition to those stipulated in the Collier County ordinance, include a requirement for lining of reclaimed water storage systems; prohibition on the construction of Class I injection wells; and prohibition on the installation and use of above ground and underground storage tanks. None of those prohibited uses are anticipated as part of the Project within 500 feet of the planned Collier County PWS wellfield. al ® g. Listed Species i. Provide a plant and animal species survey to include at a minimum, listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on -site, and conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS). State actual survey times and dates, and provide a map showing the location(s) of species of special status identified on -site. Surveys for listed plant and wildlife species have been conducted on the Project site over the past several years by PAI. Listed species surveys were conducted on the following dates: September 10, 11, 18, and 19, 2002; October 16, 17, and 18, 2002; November 12, 13, 14, and 15, 2002; June 4, 5, 24, 25, and 26, 2003; October 10, 11, 17, 19, 25, and 26, 2006; and November 14, 2006. On August 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, and 25, 2009, PAI conducted an updated listed species survey for the Project. The 2002, 2003, 2006, and 2009 surveys were performed in accordance with the FWCC guidelines. Survey methodologies used were also consistent with Standardized State - Listed Animal Survey Procedures for Use in the Review of Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Projects (Beever 2006). Surveys were conducted for wildlife species listed by the FWCC and the USFWS as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern; and for plant species listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) and the USFWS as endangered, threatened, or commercially exploited. The FWCC publication, "Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern; Official Lists" (FWCC 2009) was used as a reference to identify the status of listed species in Florida. The USFWS Threatened and Endangered Species Database System (TESS) was referenced online for the federal status of listed species. Literature referenced prior to conducting the listed species surveys included the Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991), FWCC Bald Eagle location maps, and the USFWS and the FWCC documented listed species locations. The listed species surveys were conducted by qualified ecologists walking parallel belt transects and meandering transects through suitable habitat to ensure that sufficient visual coverage of ground and flora was obtained. Transect locations and spacings are shown on Exhibit 13. Exhibit 13A shows transects walked during the 2009 listed species survey. Exhibit 13B depicts transects for listed species surveys conducted during the 2002, 2003, and 2006 listed species surveys. Surveys were conducted during daylight hours, typically starting after sunrise and concluding mid- afternoon. At regular intervals, the ecologists stopped, remained quiet, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. Surveys were conducted with the aid of 8x or l Ox power binoculars. 27 ® In addition to the listed species surveys, RCW non - nesting season foraging surveys were conducted October through December of 2003. Nesting season and cavity tree foraging surveys for the RCW were conducted April through May 2004. The surveys were conducted according to the USFWS Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species (SLOPES) for the RCW (USFWS 2002). Transects and observation stations were recorded on aerial photographs each day, for both surveys. Wildlife observations were recorded for each survey transect. Visual observations were aided by binoculars. Relative weather conditions were also recorded for each survey period. Two old RCW cavity trees were identified north of Sabal Palm Road in the central portion of the Project. One RCW was observed during the non - nesting foraging survey on the northeast portion of the Project site. A summary of the 2003 and 2004 RCW cavity tree and foraging surveys is included as Exhibit 20. An updated RCW non - nesting season foraging survey was conducted in October through December 2009. An updated RCW nesting season foraging survey was conducted in April and May 2010. The 2009 -2010 surveys were conducted according to the USFWS guidelines in the South Florida Survey Protocol (USFWS 2004). No RCWs or cavities in live pine trees were observed during the 2009 -2010 RCW non - nesting and nesting seasons foraging surveys. During the 2009 -2010 RCW surveys, no activity was observed at or around the old cavity trees identified during the 2003 -2004 RCW surveys. One old cavity tree was observed to be dead and decaying. A summary of the 2009 -2010 RCW non - nesting and nesting seasons foraging surveys is included as Exhibit 21. At the request of the FWCC, a survey for the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) was conducted on January 9, 10, 11, 16, and 17, 2007. An acoustic bat detector was used to determine the presence or absence of bats on the Project site. No Florida bonneted bats were detected during the surveys. A summary of the Florida bonneted bat survey is attached as Exhibit 22. Listed wildlife species were also observed and documented during other fieldwork conducted on the Project site. Table 7 summarizes listed wildlife species observed on the Project site during the listed species surveys, RCW surveys, as well as during FLUCFCS mapping, wetland flagging, agency site visits, and any other on -site field work conducted. Approximate locations of observed listed wildlife species are shown on Exhibit 13. Table 7. Listed Wildlife Species Observed on the Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD Property Common Name Scientific Name Status FWCC USFWS Reptiles American Alligator. Alligator mississi iensis SSC T (S /A) Gopher Tortoise (burrow) Go herus polyphe mus T -- n L Table 7. (Continued) Common Name Scientific Name Status FWCC USFWS Birds Snowy Egret E retta thula SSC -- Little Blue Heron E retta caerula SSC -- Tit- Colored Heron E retta tricolor SSC -- Roseate Spoonbill A'aia a'a'a SSC -- White Ibis Eudocimus albus SSC -- Wood Stork M cteria americana E E Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucoce halus Red - Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis T E Mammals Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia T -- Florida Black Bear Ursus americanus oridanus T -- Florida Panther si Puma concolor coryi E E FWCC — Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service E — Endangered SSC — Species of Special Concern T — Threatened T (S /A) — Threatened due to similarity of appearance * Protected under the U.S. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Adult and juvenile American alligators have been observed on the Project site during FLUCFCS mapping and wetland flagging as well as during the 2006 updated listed species survey. Most of the American alligators were observed in association with the ditches located south of Sabal Palm Road in the southwestern portion of the property. One American alligator was observed in a freshwater marsh habitat in the southern portion of the site. A juvenile American alligator was observed on a flooded trail in hydric melaleuca habitat in the central portion of the Project site. Gopher Tortoise (Go pherus poly hemus) One inactive gopher tortoise burrow was observed on the Project site during the 2006 listed species survey. The gopher tortoise burrow was observed in a palmetto prairie habitat located in the proposed conservation area in the northeast portion of the Project site. During the 2009 listed species survey, two potentially occupied gopher tortoise burrows were identified in palmetto prairie habitat located north of Sabal Palm Road and just south of the state -owned outparcel. At the time of the survey, both burrows were inundated with water. The gopher tortoise burrow located during the 2006 survey was not observed during the 2009 survey and no other burrows were identified in the northeastern portion of the Project. 29 Snowy Egret (Egretta thula) Snowy egrets have been observed foraging on the Project site in association with the recreational area, low pasture, pine - cypress, and freshwater marsh habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerula) Little blue herons were observed foraging on the Project site in association with low pasture, ditches, cypress, and pine - cypress habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. Tri- Colored Heron (Egretta tricolor) Tri- colored herons have been observed foraging on the Project site in association with low pasture, ditches, cypress, pine - cypress habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. Roseate Spoonbill (Ajaia a�aia) Roseate spoonbills were observed on the Project site in association with ditches pine - cypress habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. White Ibis (Eudocimus albus) White ibis were observed on the Project site in association with the recreational area, low pasture, ditches, cypress, pine - cypress, and freshwater marsh habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. Wood Stork (&cteria americana) Wood storks have been observed on the Project site in association with ditches and various wetland habitats. Potential foraging habitat for the wood stork includes wetlands and other surface water habitats. The Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 199 1) list no bird rookeries on the Project site. According to the USFWS database the nearest documented wood stork rookery that has been recorded as active since 1990 is Rookery No. 619161 located approximately 16 miles northeast of the Project. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus� Although the bald eagle is no longer listed as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern by the FWCC or the USFWS, it is still protected under the U.S. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Bald eagles have been observed on -site perched in trees and snags including in the old farm field along the north side of Sabal Palm Road, east of the Willow Run Quarry, and near the Junior Deputy Lake. No bald eagle nests have been identified on -site. A review of the FWCC database for bald eagle nests within Collier County shows no documented bald eagle nests within a one mile radius of the Project site. The nearest recorded bald eagle nest (CO -015) is located 1.5± miles northeast of the Project boundary in Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 27 East. Bald Eagle Nest CO -015 was reported as being active during the 2008 -2009 nesting season. The next closest bald eagle nest (CO -037) is located 30 approximately three miles south of the Project boundary. Bald Eagle Nest CO -037 was reported as being active during the 2008 -2009 nesting season. Red - Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Two old RCW cavity trees were identified in 2004 in pine habitats in the eastern portion of the Project site just north of Sabal Palm Road. It was noted that the cavity trees did not have resin wells. One RCW was observed on the northeastern portion of the property during the RCW nesting season foraging survey in May 2004. During the 2009 -2010 RCW foraging surveys, no evidence of activity by RCWs at the two old cavity trees was observed. One of the old cavity trees was observed to be dead and decaying. No RCWs or cavities in live pine trees were observed during the 2009 -2010 RCW foraging surveys. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niQer avicennia) Big cypress fox squirrels have been observed on -site in association with hydric melaleuca, pine - cypress, and pine habitats, as well as in pine trees in the abandoned farm field on the north side of Sabal Palm Road. Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Florida black bear tracks, scat, and scratch marks on trees have been identified on- site. One Florida black bear was observed on the Project site south of Sabal Palm Road in November 2009 during the RCW non - nesting season foraging survey. Florida Panther (Puma concolor corgi The Project site is located within the Primary Zone of the USFWS Panther Focus Area (Kautz et al. 2006). Telemetry points from radio - collared panthers have been recorded by the FWCC on the Project site. The panther telemetry points recorded on- site within the past five years (from August 2004 to August 2009) are from Florida Panther Nos. 146, 147, 148, and 156. Most of the telemetry locations are south of Sabal Palm Road. The telemetry points north of Sabal Palm Road are scattered throughout the central and eastern portions of the Project. During fieldwork in 2009, Florida panther sign was documented on -site. Florida panther tracks were identified on Sabal Palm Road leading south onto the Project site; on a dirt trail on the east side of the Project site (east of the Sports Park); on a trail east of Willow Run Quarry; and south of the citrus grove located on Sabal Palm Road. A Florida panther scrape /scratch was identified in pine - cypress habitat about one -half mile south of Sabal Palm Road. Listed plant species identified on the Project site and the habitat types (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) in which they were found are listed in Table 8. Four listed plant species were observed on the Project site. 31 Table 8. Listed Plant Species Observed on the Hacienda Lakes DRI /MPUD Property FDACS — Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service C — Commercially Exploited E — Endangered ii. Identify all listed species that are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on the site or that have been directly observed on the site. The proximity of listed species to the Project site as documented by the FWCC is provided as Exhibit 23. Listed wildlife species that were not observed, but which have the potential to occur on the Project site are listed in Table 9. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida Volume I. Mammals (Humphrey 1992); Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles (Moler 1992); Volume V. Birds (Rodgers et al. 1996); and personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Table 9. Listed Wildlife That Could Potentially Occur on the Hacienda Lakes DRI /MPUD Property Common Name Scientific Name Desi nated Status Habitat Common Name Scientific Name (FLUCFCS (FLUCFCS Code) Amphibians and Re tiles Gopher Frog FDACS USFWS _ 211/260/3219/ Code Butterfly Orchid Enc clia tam ensis C - 6249 Stiff - Leaved Wild Tillandsia corais couperi T 6219/6249/ Pine asciculata E _ 6259/6289 Giant Airplant Tillandsia utriculata E _ 6219/6249/ SSC _ 514/6419/742 6259/6289 Cowhom Orchid Cyrtopodium E _ 6249 unctatum FDACS — Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service C — Commercially Exploited E — Endangered ii. Identify all listed species that are known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on the site or that have been directly observed on the site. The proximity of listed species to the Project site as documented by the FWCC is provided as Exhibit 23. Listed wildlife species that were not observed, but which have the potential to occur on the Project site are listed in Table 9. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida Volume I. Mammals (Humphrey 1992); Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles (Moler 1992); Volume V. Birds (Rodgers et al. 1996); and personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Table 9. Listed Wildlife That Could Potentially Occur on the Hacienda Lakes DRI /MPUD Property Common Name Scientific Name Designated Status Potential Habitat FWCC USFWS (FLUCFCS Code) Amphibians and Re tiles Gopher Frog Rana capito SSC _ 211/260/3219/ 4119/4279 Eastern indigo Drymarchon 3219/4119/ snake corais couperi T T 4279/4269/ 4349/6249/ 6259 Birds Lim kin p Aramus SSC _ 514/6419/742 uarauna 32 Table 9. (Continued) Common Name Scientific Name Designated Status Potential Habitat FWCC USFWS (FLUCFCS Code) Birds Continued Southeastern Falco sparverius 4119/4159/ American Kestrel paulus T _ 6259 Florida Sandhill Grus canadensis 211/260/262/ Crane pratensis T - 3219/6419/ 740/7401 Athene Burrowing Owl cunicularia SSC - 211/260 oridana Mammals Florida Bonneted m ops 4119/4289/4349/ Bat omops s [Eu E - 525/530/6249/ 6259/6289/6419 FWCC — Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service E — Endangered SSC — Species of Special Concern T — Threatened Gopher Frog (Rana areolata) The gopher frog could potentially occur within upland Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 4119) habitat on the Project site; however, it is typically only found in association with populations of gopher tortoise. Gopher tortoise habitat on -site is limited. Preferred breeding habitat, including seasonally flooded grassy ponds and cypress ponds that lack fish populations, was not observed on -site (Moler 1992). Eastern Indigo Snake (DUmarchon corais couperi) The Eastern indigo snake could potentially occur within the native upland and wetland habitats on the Project site. The Eastern indigo snake is far ranging and may utilize activity areas of 125 to 250 acres or more (Moler 1992). The Eastern indigo snake is typically found in association with populations of gopher tortoise. Gopher tortoise habitat is limited and no Eastern indigo snakes were found on -site. Limpkin (Aramus guarauna) Potential foraging habitat for limpkin includes ditches. The Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 199 1) lists no bird rookeries on the Project site. The nearest recorded site is No. 620022 located approximately 8.5 miles south of the Project in East Marco Bay near Marco Island in Section 9, Township 52 South, Range 26 East. This colony was last reported occupied by Qbrown pelicans (Pelecanus occidentalis) in 1989. No limpkins were found on -site. 33 Southeastern American Kestrel (Falco sparverius vaulus) Potential habitat for Southeastern American kestrel may exist within the pine habitats on the Project site (FLUCFCS Codes 4119, 4159, and 6259); however, the Project site is at the southernmost extreme of the known range for this subspecies. Since 1980, observations of Southeastern American kestrel in Florida have occurred primarily in sandhill or sandpine scrub areas of North and Central Florida (Rodgers et al. 1996). No Southeastern American kestrels were found on -site. Florida Sandhill Crane (Gros canadensis pratensis) Potential foraging habitat for Florida sandhill crane may exist within the Disturbed Land (FLUCFCS Code 740); Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212); Open Rural Land (FLUCFCS Code 260) Low Pasture, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 262); and Freshwater Marshes, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6419) habitat on the Project. Preferred sandhill crane habitat, such as prairies and shallow marshes dominated by pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata) and maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), are limited on the Project site. No Florida sandhill cranes were observed on -site. Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia floridana) Potential burrowing owl habitat exists along the berms in the Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212) and Rural Open Land (FLUCFCS Code 260) habitat on the Project site. No burrowing owls were observed on -site. Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus ), formerly known as the Florida Mastiff kwr Bat (Eumops glaucinus floridanus) Florida bonneted bats could potentially roost and/or forage within the upland and wetland habitats on the Project site. The Florida bonneted bat is known to occur in cities and forested areas on both the east and west coasts of South Florida from Charlotte County to Palm Beach County (Marks and Marks 2006, Humphrey 1992). A Florida bonneted bat survey was conducted on the Project site using the Anabat sonar and software equipment and survey guidelines recommended by Cynthia and George Marks. No Florida bonneted bats were detected. Listed plant species that were not observed, but which have the potential to occur on the Project site are listed in Table 10. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Table 10. Listed Plant Species That Could Potentially Occur on the Hacienda Lakes DRUMPUD Property Common Name Scientific Name Desi nated Status Potential Location FDACS USFWS (FLUCFCS Code Bird's nest spleenwort; wild Asplenium serratum E - 4289/6289 bird nest fern 34 r L Table 10. (Continued) FDACS — Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service C — Commercially Exploited E — Endangered T — Threatened Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to species of special status. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. The proposed site plan has been designed to minimize impacts to listed species. This includes the preservation and enhancement of wetland and upland habitats on the property. The site plan includes the preservation of 1,589.971 acres of wetlands, uplands and OSWs on -site, including land within existing access easements and road right -of ways. A conservation easement will be placed on 1,544.141 acres of this total. The majority of the preserve acreage is located on the eastern and southern portions of the property adjacent to the Picayune Strand State Forest. These preserve areas include high quality forested wetland habitats with upland islands. Priority has been given to preserving native vegetation that provides habitat for listed species. Where feasible, the site plan was designed to buffer the large preserves on the eastern portion of the property by locating lower intensity land uses, such as lakes, adjacent to the preserves. The lakes will buffer the preserves from the residential development. Also, the lakes will provide open water that will provide additional wildlife habitat adjacent to the preserve areas. Exhibit 24 shows the MPUD Master Plan with the locations of observed listed species (species observed during 2009 -2010 surveys and fieldwork), Florida panther r telemetry, and Florida black bear telemetry occurring on the Project site. Florida panther and Florida black bear telemetry occurring on surrounding lands has also 35 Desi nated Status Potential Common Name Scientific Name Location FDACS USFWS (FLUCFCS Code Long strap fern Campyloneurum E _ 6219 h llitidus White - squirrel- banana; beautiful Deeringothamnus E E 4119 pulchellus pawpaw Catesb 's lily Lilium catesbaei T - 6259 Hand adder's tongue Ophioglossum fern palmatum E _ 4289 Inflated wild pine Tillandsia T _ 4289 balbisiana Florida coontie Zamia oridana C - 4119 Simpson's zephyr Zephyranthes lily sim sonii T _ 6259 FDACS — Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service C — Commercially Exploited E — Endangered T — Threatened Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to species of special status. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. The proposed site plan has been designed to minimize impacts to listed species. This includes the preservation and enhancement of wetland and upland habitats on the property. The site plan includes the preservation of 1,589.971 acres of wetlands, uplands and OSWs on -site, including land within existing access easements and road right -of ways. A conservation easement will be placed on 1,544.141 acres of this total. The majority of the preserve acreage is located on the eastern and southern portions of the property adjacent to the Picayune Strand State Forest. These preserve areas include high quality forested wetland habitats with upland islands. Priority has been given to preserving native vegetation that provides habitat for listed species. Where feasible, the site plan was designed to buffer the large preserves on the eastern portion of the property by locating lower intensity land uses, such as lakes, adjacent to the preserves. The lakes will buffer the preserves from the residential development. Also, the lakes will provide open water that will provide additional wildlife habitat adjacent to the preserve areas. Exhibit 24 shows the MPUD Master Plan with the locations of observed listed species (species observed during 2009 -2010 surveys and fieldwork), Florida panther r telemetry, and Florida black bear telemetry occurring on the Project site. Florida panther and Florida black bear telemetry occurring on surrounding lands has also 35 been included on Exhibit 24. FWCC telemetry data for the Florida panther indicates utilization of the eastern and southern portions of the Project site. On -site Florida black bear telemetry points are located on the southern portion of the property. A table summarizing the native vegetation communities preserved and those listed species which have been observed to occur within these habitats is included in the EIS as Exhibit 25. Enhancement of the wetland and upland preserves will include the hand removal of exotic vegetation such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and downy rose myrtle. The surface water management system will be designed to maintain appropriate wetland hydroperiods within the enhancement areas. The wetland hydroperiods will be maintained to provide for the natural wet and dry cycles, which provides foraging for wading birds. The Preserve Area Management Plan for the Project is provided as Exhibit 26. The mitigation areas totaling 1,544.14± acres will be placed in a conservation easement or other equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the SFWMD. iv. Provide habitat management plans for each of the listed species known to occur on the property. For sites with bald eagle nests and /or nestprotection zones, bald eagle management plans are required, copies of which shall be included as exhibits attached to the PUD documents, where applicable. A Listed Species Management Plan is included as Exhibit 27. V. Where applicable, include correspondence received from the FWCC and the USFWS, with regards to the project. Explain how the concerns of these agencies have been met. The applicant is coordinating with the FWCC regarding further development of the Listed Species Management Plan for the Project. To date, no correspondence has been received from the FWCC regarding the Project. Per guidance from the FWCC, the applicant has conducted a survey for the Florida bonneted bat. A summary of the Florida bonneted bat survey is included as Exhibit 22. The applicant provided Corps and USFWS with an updated biological assessment in June 2010. Subsequently, a site visit and meeting were held with USFWS staff on August 18, 2010. The Corps sent a comment letter to the applicant regarding Hacienda Lakes on April 5, 2011, and provided the applicant with the USFWS' comment letter dated November 2, 2010 (Exhibit 28). The applicant is preparing responses to the USFWS' comments and will continue coordination with the USFWS and FWCC. 36 h. Other i. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with the Marina Siting and other criteria in the Manatee Protection Plan. Not applicable. ii. Include the results of any environmental assessments and /or audits of the property. If applicable, provide a narrative of the cost and measures needed to clean up the site. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report was prepared by Ardaman & Associates, Inc. in September 2004 for the Toll- Rattlesnake DRUMPUD. A Preliminary Site Assessment Report was prepared in July 2005 by Ardaman & Associates, Inc. for the 23t acre abandoned shotgun sporting clay range located on the property. Both reports are included on a CD provided as Exhibit 19. iii. For site located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern — Special Treatment (ACSC-ST) overlay district, show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations established for the ACSC -ST. Not applicable. iv. Soil sampling or ground water monitoring reports and programs shall be required for sites that occupy old farm fields, old golf courses or for which there is a reasonable basis for believing that there has been previous contamination on site. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by the Environmental Services staff along with the Pollution Control Department and the FDEP. A Phase I Site Assessment of the Project site was conducted by Ardaman & Associates, Inc in September 2004. A copy of this report, as well as a memo summarizing the report, is included on a CD provided as Exhibit 19. V. Provide documentation for the Florida Master Site File, Florida Department of State and any printed historic archaeological surveys that have been conducted on the project area. Locate any known historic or archaeological sites and their relationships to the proposed project design. Demonstrate how the project design preserves the historic /archaeological integrity of the site. An archaeological and historical survey of the Project site was conducted by Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AHC) from October through December 2005. The results of this study found five archaeological sites within the Project boundary and three target sites regarded as areas of archaeological concern. The five archaeological sites were identified as areas of local significance. Of these sites, three were determined to be potentially eligible for listing on the National 37 Register of Historic Places. Recommendations for site interpretation and management are described in AHC's report, which is enclosed as Exhibit 29. In a letter dated June 9, 2010, the Florida Department of State Division of Historical Resources stated their determination that no historic properties are likely to be adversely affected by the Project (Exhibit 30). The five archaeological sites as well as the three target sites of archaeological concern will be preserved within the Project's conservation areas. At the request of Collier County staff, access easements have been provided for each of the five archaeological sites for potential digs and further study of the sites. The access easements and the archaeological sites have been excluded from the native vegetation preservation requirements. REFERENCES Beever, James W. III. 2006. Standardized State - Listed Animal Survey Procedures for Use in the Review of SWFRPC Projects. First Edition. Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, Fort Myers, Florida. Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550- 010 -00l .a. Third Edition. Florida Exotic Pest Plan Council. 2009. List of Florida's Invasive Species. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. Internet: www.fleppc.org/05list.htm. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2009. Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern. Official Lists, Bureau of Non -Game Wildlife, Division of Wildlife. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Tallahassee, Florida. Humphrey, S.R. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume 1. Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 118 -133 Marks, C.S. and G.E. Marks. 2006. Bats of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Moler, Paul E. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Rodgers, J.A., Jr., S.T. Schwikert, and A. Shapiro - Wenner. 1996. Nesting habitat of wood storks in north and central Florida, USA. Colonial Waterbirds 16:1 -21 39 References (Continued) Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies, Update 1986 - 1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species, Red - Cockaded Woodpeckers. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Red - Cockaded Woodpecker South Florida Survey Protocol (adapted from USFWS 2003). .o EXHIBIT 1 RESUMES El Education Experience Professional Associations Certifications KENNETH C. PASSARELLA President and Principal Ecologist, Passarella & Associates, Inc. President and Principal Ecologist for Passarella & Associates, Inc., an ecological consulting firm providing environmental and ecological services to private land owners and local and state agencies. Services include state, federal, and local permitting; agency negotiations; environmental impact assessments; ecological assessments; listed species surveys, permitting and relocation; state and federal wetland jurisdictionals; wetland mitigation design, permitting and construction observations; wetland mitigation banking management, design, permitting and construction observations; and environmental project management. M.S. Marine Science, 1990 University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, Florida B.A. Marine Science, 1984. Major: Marine Science, Minor: Botany Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, Florida Ecologist, Director of Wetland Permitting Section, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., Fort Myers, FL, October 1993 - May 1996. Environmental consultant to private land owners, land planners, commercial and residential developers, engineering firms, and state and federal agencies. Consulting services included: permitting with federal, state, and local environmental regulatory agencies; wetland mitigation bank permitting; environmental impact assessments providing analysis for existing or expected impacts on water quality, biological communities, and natural resources; habitat evaluation; reclamation and restoration of altered or disturbed land; wetland mitigation design, permitting, and construction observations; natural resources management; and endangered species survey, management, and relocation plans. Environmental Consultant, Johnson Engineering, Inc., Fort Myers, FL, May 1988 - October 1993. Member of firm's environmental section. Project manager for environmental planning, ecological studies, and regulatory agency coordination. Performed wetland jurisdictional determinations, wildlife surveys, wetland monitoring, wetland mitigation design, regulatory permitting, and project management. Environmental Specialist I, Sarasota County Natural Resources Department, Sarasota, FL, July 1987 - May 1988. Primary responsibilities included environmental planning, permitting, and enforcement of county environmental regulatory codes. Performed field inspections, including permit inspections and compliance. Prepared permit summaries and notices of permit violations. Conducted Environmental Permitting Course for County Growth Management Divisions. Biological Scientist Assistant, Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Marine Research, Vertebrate Section, St. Petersburg, FL, February 1985 - July 1987. National Association of Environmental Professionals Florida Association of Environmental Professionals President of State Board (1996 to 1999) State Board of Directors (1991 to 1996) President of Southwest Florida Chapter (1991 - 1994) Society of Wetland Scientists Certified Professional Wetland Scientist by the Society of Wetland Scientists Certified Senior Ecologist by the Ecological Society of America Certified Wetland Delineator by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Education Experience Continuing Education Professional Associations Certifications CHERYL M. ROLPH Ecologist, Passarella & Associates, Inc. Provides ecological services for private and public development and road projects. Services include state, federal, and local wetland jurisdictional determinations; environmental construction inspections; environmental impact assessments; ecological assessments; listed species surveys; and wetland monitoring. Bachelor of Science, Environmental Studies, 2004 Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida Environmental Specialist III, State of Florida, Department of Environmental Protection, Fort Myers, Florida, August 2004 — June 2005. Determined wetland boundaries according to Chapter 62 -340, F.A.C. Worked integrally with Lee County Department of Community Development as well as other governmental entities and private environmental consultants. Reviewed wetland determination reports prepared by consultants. Educated the public on wetland functions and hydric soils. Biology Laboratory Technician, Environmental Planning and Analysis, Tallahassee, Florida, May 2004 — August 2004. Efficiently and accurately performed lab work involving identification of aquatic organisms present in saltwater and freshwater sediment samples. Assisted with collection of samples from rivers and estuaries of project areas. • Environmental Permitting Short Course, Marco Island, Florida, 2005. • Florida Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) Short Course, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, August 2005. • Hydric Soils Specialized Wetland Training, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, October 2005. • Richard Chinn's COE Delineation, Tampa, Florida, July 2006. • Florida Wetlands (CLE), Tampa, Florida, November 2006. • Gopher Tortoise Management, Gainesville, Florida, July 2007. • Environmental Permitting 101 - SFWMD, Fort Myers, Florida, August 2007. • Florida Panther at Rookery Bay, Naples, Florida, September 2008. • Green Futures Expo & energy Options Conference, Punta Gorda, Florida, November 2009. • FWC Gopher Tortoise Workshop, Port Charlotte, Florida, Florida, May 2009. • Managing Preserves & Natural Areas, Naples, Florida, July 2009. • Climate Policy, Carbon Credits & Business Risk, Fort Myers, Florida, July 2009. • Gopher Tortoise Authorized Agent Workshop, Gainesville, Florida, February, 2009. • Wildlife Conservation Webnar, Fort Myers, Florida, October 2009. • FAEP RCW Biology and Habitat, Naples, Florida, May 2010. • South Carolina Wetland Delineation, Columbia, South Carolina, November, 2010. • South Carolina Hydric Soils — Basic Processes, Wilmington, North Carolina, March 2011. Florida Association of Environmental Professionals Society of Wetland Scientists Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent EXHIBIT 2 AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development PUDZ - 2006 -AR -10146 Exhibit: #2 Drawing: #OIMTT737 A erial with FLUCFCS & Wetlands Ma Can be viewed in the Minutes &Records Dept. — Map was too large for the scanner • EXHIBIT 3 FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP • E u LL NOTES: 140P PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER RWA, INC DRAWING NO.2010 -01 -07 BNDY.DWG DATED JANUARY 7, 2010. SURVEYED WETLAND LINES PER BANKS ENGINEERING, INC. DRAWING NO.PODS FOR APPROVAL 1 -II- 2010- PN- MOD.DwG DATED JANUARY 11, 2010. FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1' =200' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999). % OF CODE 4119'1 4289'1 LEGEND: 180 RECREATIONAL SFWMD WETLANDS 3.5% 212 (1752.72 Apt) `N 0.4% SFWMD 'OTHER SURFACE WATERS' RURAL OPEN LAND 10.54Ac.± (17.85 ACt) SCALE: 111 = 16001 EIAREA LANDS NOT INCLUDED IN PROJECT 2.4% 4119EI ' (18.52 Ac.t} 27.81 Ac.± '-^ SURVEYED WETLAND LINE NOTES: 140P PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER RWA, INC DRAWING NO.2010 -01 -07 BNDY.DWG DATED JANUARY 7, 2010. SURVEYED WETLAND LINES PER BANKS ENGINEERING, INC. DRAWING NO.PODS FOR APPROVAL 1 -II- 2010- PN- MOD.DwG DATED JANUARY 11, 2010. FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1' =200' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999). FLUCFCS % OF CODE 4119'1 4289'1 TOTAL 180 RECREATIONAL (0.4 3.5% 212 UNIMPROVED PASTURE 9.14 Ac. ± 0.4% L119EI 0.18 dC.Y) RURAL OPEN LAND 10.54Ac.± 0.5% • 6249E1 • •624GE3 LOW PASTURE, HYDRIC 54.43 Ac. ± 2.4% 4119EI ' (18.52 Ac.t} 27.81 Ac.± 1.2% 3219E2 (0.39 AC.t •(1.68 .tl P/L 3219E3 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (50.75% EXOTICS) 3.71 Ac.± ]Q. 3219E4 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 5.75 Ac. ± 6219E2 ( PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (0-24% EX(jTICS) 90.01 Ac.± 4.0% (0.5] A. 6419E 119E2 143.78 Ac. ± 6.4% 4119E3 6219'1 6249'3 64 9E 4119E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76.100% EXOTICS) (I.]O ACi (2.04 0.914C.0 PINE, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 6.77Ac.:t 0.3% 9EI O6 Ac 1 EI 6219E1 0.43 Ac.!) 10.78Ac.± 0.5% 6149'3 U. 4279EI 0.3% 4221 (2.31 A- 1.81 Ac.± 0.55 U.r) 424 MELALEUCA 6419E2 (I.b2 A[.! 6419'1 .ZE Ac.!) 919 219'1 (0.5J Act) 8301 345.07 Ac.± 42)9' 4269E1 6ri9E3 (0.3 Ac,t) 0.0% (0.69 Ae.f) 9 0.96 4c .f) L211 551 4279E1 0419'1 1.]I 4119'2 (0.26 A .f) ( OS Ae.t) 8;21 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) (1.03 -) 279E 0.23 A -) 6ri9E2 03 0.1] U. 1) 4119'2( 1.20 Ac. t 6249'2 (0.19 Ac. .(I.I6 U. CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) .40 .t) 0.14 A 8301 0.45 A . 0.8% 4289E3 • .M. . 3.25 Ac. ± E1 0.24 Ac.(I • '06 20 4349E1 3219'1 (0.]B AC.f) . (IA Ac.$) 219E2 (26.18 4c.f) go .67 (1.98 AC.()4119E2 P/L (2D.9 M. (2.6) .!)� (q.0 • - 8 k. DITCH 3.38 Ac. ± 209E2 6189E1 6249E 4119 12.82 AC (I.LI Acf) 3• 249'3 I 4119'2 0.5% 1.591 EZ 6249'2 WILLOW, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 0.1 9 I.)1 AC.t . 5 1.54 -0 6419E1 AC.f 0.404C.f) 157.74 Ac.± (T 3659 t), �1 411 1• 9 ' S Ac 4119'1 (I. Ac. e]2 E• " • • 0.23 A<. 6259E 4119'2 4119'2 6249E2 3219E1 0.61 M.t) 1.2% .• 89 A 4q 6245 25 1 1 S.JI sl' B] Ac. t) • • • • (0.26 M.f) (I.8] Ac. 3219'1 52459E2 Ac. B ! 10.93 E ( 1 19ES 6249 •' • •6 6249 1 6) 4C.f 6319'3 (0.50 Ac. 0.63 Ac!) 4119E1 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (50 -75% EXOTICS) ().39 A .f • 1 AC.f) 8 0 2.5b At.t 6.63 Ac. 0.1% 6249'2 4159'3 MOEI 16.]6 44.!) 289.16 Ac. t • 0. Ac. .. 21 qE3 . . • 6249E2 (1.32 ct) (0.69 f) (0.9 At') 621.2 0' 327.32 Ac.:~ 14.5% 4119E 41 L Ac • 8 4119 • ' 6259E3 6259E3 L119E1 (0.20 AG 6289'1 6249E4 0.33 Ac.!) 411 E2 g3 6249 3(2.)0 At.t)(1,1) 196 ' 0.32 Ac.!) L.f)(4.] AC.f) 0. 5 qc.t) (1'uAC3f 1.40 Ac.t) PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (25-49% EXOTICS) Ac x(0;5 (1.48 Ac.!) 4119E • • 6669'2 6259FI. • • • . •().66 k.t) 524BE3 PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (50 -75% EXOTICS) (0.30 Ac.x) 62L ES 62 9E 0.18 M..). ' • 219'2 , ' HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 31.52 Ac. ± 6259E 41 963 (O.o Ac.!) O.L) Ac 41 963 6259E2 119E2 I. '. 27.86 Ac. ± 1.2% (I.ss AC. I.]0 M.t) 3z1 (LN Ac.f) ]601 • 19.e) Ac.:) 159'3 .... erivEl 2.8% (0.)3 .B so.. .r 4159E2 (1.45 .x) , , 4119E (0.2 K.!) 625BE3 L119E1 6ri9E3 (1.04 U. , q t) II9E] ) 6289E1 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) (2.18 Ac.f (2.88 Ac. 6159'4 6249F3 4119'3 (6.4] Ac 1.01 Ac.t) (0.21 Ac. 4119E •TI (0.31 Ac. 3219'3 SE (23.52 M.f) • 6 .95 Ac.) 4 24 09 Ac (0.41 AGl) 962 ri9E3 (0.51 A-) HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 6.94 Ac.± (0.08 Ac.t)• 3219 (0.05 U. , 119FI 119'1 (0'03 M' 6219'1 , •. HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (50.75% EXOTICS) 2.09 Ac. --t 1590 6259E3 119 {].1B AC!)• 6219 • • 19.90 Ac.± 0.9% 0.31 m.t) (0.31 Acf A I', 5249E •411 EI 9R F 0.3% 6319E3 WETLAND SHRUB, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 4119'3 ' 6419E1 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 180 (].IB Ac.t) } tj 4119'1 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 10.63Ac.± (]9.69 4L.t) )L2 (0.0) A<.f •'(0.48 2602 4269'1 ' 3.21 Ac.± 0.1% 7401 awEZ to •4ns .' (6.4o Ac.:)• 0.8% 742 BORROW AREA (2.6040.2 •0.10 AC.r)' • •6259'4 743 SPOIL 0.16 Ac. ± ]]i01 (071 4cz • 6309'1 • • 1119EI • • BERM 0'93 Ac. 0.0% 40 ,(8.]8 At.!). . (I.0 Ac.� .'(106.18 AC.lI, . , , , 0.32 Ac. ± 0.0% P/L (0.46 Ae.t 119E 4.33Ac.± 0.2% 830 ]42 to .6 0.0% 8301 UTILITIES, HYDRIC (5.09 • 6249'3 ' AC.' • • •' 832 POWERLINE EASEMENT 1.24Ac.± • 9E .1iJ198 • . •( ) U. 6'49• 8321 POWERUNE EASEMENT, HYDRIC g27 Ac. - 6249E2 , • (0.64 K.$)• TOTAL 2262.14 Ac.± 100.0% 1.51 (6.46 Ac2), • 6119E2 P/L •'•'•' )401 II 3 0.33 AC.W.' • 8146 B.I6 Ac.t .(0. 4C . . . . 6249'] , 4119F4 (0 Ac .30 .! 740 .02 qc.!), -, -, •.�. 830 8301 (0.69 AC. r) 4159'2 4119'32(0.02 c.t)(O.B At.t)i18 (2.44 Ct)(026 ) 814 ••( 9 f) ••309'1 . 6309'1 ] • • 2)4. ) •. (0.33 AC.2 -•' FLUCFCS % OF CODE DESCRIPTION TOTAL 180 RECREATIONAL 79.89 Ac. ± 3.5% 212 UNIMPROVED PASTURE 9.14 Ac. ± 0.4% 260 RURAL OPEN LAND 10.54Ac.± 0.5% 262 LOW PASTURE, HYDRIC 54.43 Ac. ± 2.4% 3219E1 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 27.81 Ac.± 1.2% 3219E2 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 12.60 Ac.± 0.6% 3219E3 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (50.75% EXOTICS) 3.71 Ac.± 0.2% 3219E4 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 5.75 Ac. ± 0.3% 4119E1 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (0-24% EX(jTICS) 90.01 Ac.± 4.0% 4119E2 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 143.78 Ac. ± 6.4% 4119E3 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 23.49Ac.:t 1.0% 4119E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76.100% EXOTICS) 0.35 Ac.± 0.0% 4159E2 PINE, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 6.77Ac.:t 0.3% 4159E3 PINE, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 10.78Ac.± 0.5% 4159E4 PINE, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 6.47 Ac. ± 0.3% 4221 BRAZILIAN PEPPER, HYDRIC 1.81 Ac.± 0.1% 424 MELALEUCA 13.70 Ac. ± 0.6% 4241 MELALEUCA, HYDRIC 345.07 Ac.± 15.3% 4269E1 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 0.40 Ac.± 0.0% 4269E2 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 2.25 Ac.± 0.1% 4279E1 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (0.24% EXOTICS) 3.89 Ac. ± 0.2% 4279E2 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 0.29 Ac.± 0.0% 4289E1 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 1.20 Ac. t 0.1% 4289E2 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 19.OB Ac.± 0.8% 4289E3 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 3.25 Ac. ± 0.1% 4349E1 HARDWOOD /CONIFER MIXED, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 1.47 Ac. t 0.1% 514 DITCH 3.38 Ac. ± 0.1% 6189E1 WILLOW, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 10.97Ac.± 0.5% 6189E2 WILLOW, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 2.48 Ac. ± 0.1% 5219E1 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 157.74 Ac.± 7.0% 6219E2 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 27.66 Ac. ± 1.2% 6219E3 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.45Ac.± 0.1% 52459E2 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (25.49% EXOTICS) 1.32 Ac.± 0.1% 62459E3 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 2.36 Ac.± 0.1% 6249E1 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0.24 %EXOTICS) 289.16 Ac. t 12.8% 6249E2 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 327.32 Ac.:~ 14.5% 6249E3 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 258.23 Ac. t 11.4% 6249E4 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 27.86 Ac. ± 1.2% 624BE2 PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (25-49% EXOTICS) 22.9OAc.± 1.0% 524BE3 PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 9.56Ac.± 0.4% 6259E1 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 31.52 Ac. ± 1.4% 6259E2 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 27.86 Ac. ± 1.2% 6259E3 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 63.26Ac.:t 2.8% 5259E4 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 12.00 Ac.± 0.5% 625BE3 HYDRIC PINE, BURNED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.22 Ac. ± 0.1% 6289E1 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 2.64 Ac.± 0.1% 6289E2 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 6.94 Ac.± 0.3% 6289E3 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (50.75% EXOTICS) 2.09 Ac. --t 0.1% 6309E1 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 19.90 Ac.± 0.9% 6309E2 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 7.21 Ac.± 0.3% 6319E3 WETLAND SHRUB, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 5.83 Ac.± 0.3% 6419E1 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 6.82 Ac.± 0.3% 6419E2 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 10.63Ac.± 0.5% 740 DISTURBED LAND 3.21 Ac.± 0.1% 7401 DISTURBED LAND, HYDRIC 18.16 Ac. ± 0.8% 742 BORROW AREA 5,38Ac.± 0.2% 743 SPOIL 0.16 Ac. ± 0.0% 747 BERM 0'93 Ac. 0.0% 814 ROAD 0.32 Ac. ± 0.0% 8146 UNPAVED ROAD 4.33Ac.± 0.2% 830 UTILITIES 1.08Ac.± 0.0% 8301 UTILITIES, HYDRIC 4.82 Ac.± 0.2% 832 POWERLINE EASEMENT 1.24Ac.± 0.1% 8321 POWERUNE EASEMENT, HYDRIC g27 Ac. - 02% TOTAL 2262.14 Ac.± 100.0% 4119EY 6249FJ !) 8301 830 0.] Ac.t) (1.5113gc.t; • • •(3.65 AC. � •. • ' . . .. Ac (1.93 A .t) (0 J Ac.t • • 0249EY , P11f 6149'2 ' %. 0419 • • ••, ••�• •' (21.0)AC.t). 159E 119'3 .• (3.6)AC.t).. •(0.19 AC.Y '•'''''''•' (0.34 (0.19 AC.f) t 6 19E1 , . • 4119'1 4119'2 .(0.02 Act) . x(1.26 Ac.tj , 5 E3 f) 9E2 • • •(0. Ac..) (0.5 249 •964 1.23 AC. :) '. .••(I.814c!),',','.' 6 Ac.x • qt, 4289'1 ' • • 4241 � 4119E � (p.32 4C.Z)• • • 4289'3 • � � 2 A9E2)(• 119'1 ' 0.60 Ac!) • 424 23 149E3 4119E c t 6249'] ().4G A ) 6 49'4 (0.65 AC.2) ' . ' ', •. •. (6.32 AC.f) .•. •.•. (']I •. , 424 219'3 4ri9E2 • 4119'2 4241 • 2 ri �� • 3219'2 ' I0.6] (0.04 Ac.t) "sou 6149 32 (0.92 4C.f) • • • • CO. AC.f7 3219 • • 424 (0.91 A4x) (I.Ob Act)' '.(219.92 Ac.� • 1.28 At.f) (1.2] AC.( B3 (0.36 4C.f) .)5 AC. (0.94 AC. t) 6249E3 ' 962 6249E2 . .. ♦ • , 119'2 • ].52 At. ]219'2 • (9).34 A<.t) • �\ (0.02 AO.f) , (4.)6 AC.!) •(2.1 #4t)- ` 3219'3 -L� /.. • • 424 y, 42 . (0.99 Ac.!) 1.61 4c.2) • 6249'3• .45 Ac. 11 121 0249'4 ••(46.80 Ac . . . • •(1.62 AC. 0. Ac.r) • -(0.1e At.$). -.t0.5 AO.r) -,.'. . • (I.)9 A<. 6y ••(28.06 • 6319'5 • • • 4289'3 ' •• • • • • • )I„ • • • • •�• • • • • 424 • •' 424 4241 5219'2 ' 4ri9E1 • • • • .ri Ac. L2B9E2 . ,'(I.SB c • .0249'4 (5.3 Ac.t . • • (0. Act). ' 4.35 ) • 19 4119 0.09 Act) (5.) Ac. :) (0. ] Ac.!) • 3219'1 • LIS9E3 eri9E3 .'.' (3.5]4 2) �5'! ( 99 ! ••6249'• • 6249'4 6 09'2 . • . . (O.b3 4C.! • . • (0.0] (0. AGT) (I.3) .s1 tl. 42AC!) (13219]!) 5219'1 2.73 6LI9 • • ().YI AC. . • 4289E�--� _ .. 74 (0.33 Ac.f) 3219'] .59 • Ac.r167. • . . JA9E . 521 • • • • • • II E2 • O.LO 4C f) • • ' •' •to 93 AC 0 • • • • • t0. U. 0.11 4[.2) (1 II 4C!) • • • 8 521 •E3 0.02 Ac 0184c2) 0`9 Ac.!) 3219'2 2 3219'2 5 ! 4241 • 6289'1 • o_y ' (0.24 Ac! I 2 219E (IS 46 40.x) (0 33 M. ]43 3219'1 . - ]401 (016 Ac r 2 6249FJ 0 Ac t) • 4119'3 0 01 Ac!) (0 56 Ac ! ' .' (I 9J 4e.f •.IB (9.20 m.r) 19'2 1.89 m.t) •' • " 42 - 262 • • 624921 • • • ' (3 .t) • (0.22 Ac.l) (6Y 84 AGS) .' IC;7' 10 3� Ac 6259EJ 143 3219'2 - - . . - •(0.'�' f)• 6 AG!) • ' 63 EI 6 19E2 t0.09 Ac. :) (1.40 Ac.t - - 212 . • 4119'1 6ri9E] (1.14 ACt) (1.68 qt.t) ,3219'2. . . . . • •3.04 AC. Y • • MOM � • • • (1.90 .Z) • • • (10.85 AC. 6245'3 0.1) p0.>V. . - 6349'1 • • • • • • • • • . (I _47 AC.f) 4 9 . • . ]40 (O,S9 f 249 6149E2 MOB U. (91 0<� ' • (1.81 Ac.! 4119'1 ,(28.08 6ri (20.011K. (1.65 Ac. • (0.96 Ac.t .56 Ac. (5.13 AC.t) ri9ET . , 0.86 U. 6259'2 ' (1.98 61LBE3 • • •11 � • E2L9EI (1.18 4cf • 119 .49 AC.f) ♦ (S.BL k.l7 3.14 Ac.$) 6259'3 6255'3 •' •' ]219F2 L.22A. �. (1. A5. • •6219F2 (0.52 Atf • "624 • • 4119 ' ♦6269'3 ' • 15 249EI 4.56 Ac ' •' 1.104c.f). (1.59 At.0 .984c • (4.18 Ac.t) 40 K 11963 963 1401 . 656 • 260 ' 6259E (0.59 Ac. t246E2 0.36 Ac.t)• (10.54 Ac.!) .55 .66 Act . • (22.90 Ac.f) • • 6249'2 • ♦ • • • • -wl •0249'3. 441: ]401 '•(19.]9 AC _t)" 614 • ' (4.53 At.t) '•'(5.19 (1.06 4c. (J.60 4c. 62 9EI 146 624 E2 411 E2 411 E2 159'3 6219EI 411 E2 (O.BO At.t) (4.03 A-) (2.45 At.t) (1.09 Lct)(5.93 AC.r) (,.-I-6 -Ac (1.25 -421.1 - (0.18 6219'2 (062 Ac.!)- .(15.92 m.0 -E1 (0.34 Ac. • IB9E1 6219'3 (0.80 m.o 0.45 Ac 62WEI (].15 AC.!) 6]49'3 6219E2 •(41.96 AC.t) ' (2.3] AcY • • 6249EI 6219'1 624912 1119E1 (0.)2 dc.! 41190 (I. 0 Ac.!) • • • • 6249EI • •6249F3 • 4119'2 ' (32.02 Ac.f)' 3219E (2J.04 K.!) L16t2 (0.02 A0. •4119'2 (2.03 Acr) ' • ' • (0.5 ' 6249EI 4119'1 6259'2 4119EI 6249'5 4119'2 4119'1 T • • 6249'4 621.9'3. Ac.t) t].5 .4( 4. Act) (0.6 M.t) (1.42 t) (0. J Ac!) PIL ( 6J :) • 219 (Ib.]I 4C.y • • • \ /• • • (0.20 Ac.t (0.20 c.!) 19EI OB # iii ///4119'10.0 A.!) • 614 (O.BS • •,• '•. .. .•••. .•.-)LOL 42� •• ••(2164[. . . . - • -,' - 4119'1 •4119EI•. -... . 6219'1 6-2-1 9EI Ac.: Ib.50 K.!) 9E , •- . -.' . . Ac. :)• AC.!).�. -. .•.�.(14.]S#L.f).• )5 4119E3 • 0249'2 . , . , • • (0.10 � - . • . . 6340'2 - 6249 - ,(0.)9 Ac. 11.55 Ac. .... (b.66 Ac.! 4119EI 6ri9E2 6249E • (0. Ac.t 0249'5 . 621,9'1 19EI • • •' 9ri9E1 -. • . 0.1) 1c.2) -. - . • 6ri9E2 IN 29 119E0.04 A. (69.09 Acf (0.03 Ac 0.92 A.f) 249'3 5 A 4119EI - , . -. 3219'1 • • • - .55 �. • (30.00 At.4. - 4119'2 4 962 • . • . . • 4119'1 . • • • • • • • (0.69 Ac.!) . (0.56 Act I ' • 6269'1 4119'1 6419'1 (0:02 k •(1.91 Ac • �6ri9 .10 Ac . • 2.5 AC.!) • - . p249E3 0119'1 2.) #C!) • . • • 0.36 Ac.r) (0.85 A0.! 4119'1 • • • 6 4119'3 (0.51 !) • • . (I. qc2). • (S.8] Ac.t) . . • • 0.99 #C. 9 (4. (O.OIACt) • -. . - - ♦- 159'2 • •.o-L119E1 4119EI 4119E1 ' - 6Y49E2 , ' •�-L 4119'2 ].29 Ac 62101 (0.10 AC.f) 0. 6 4C.2) 0289'1. (1 . (10.90 Ac.t) 419'1 /� • (0.38 §dcl.!) • • (16.81 A�.f) (28.]9 Ac.t) II � 0.19 Acf) ,.•• 4349'1 ••• _• • ••••.)2K t•••• (I OO a<.f .'. .4119'. 1.63 A.!'•• • Lc.f) ' 0249'1 • • .' (0.25 qc. . • •. 0259'2 4119E1 249'3 • . . - - - (1.13 Ac. : V' •' • • • 1.51 Act) 5 04'1 63pgE - • - . b259E1 4119'1 (0.46 Ac.f ••(11.31 K.2)' •6249'2 • 119'3 42)9' ' • • IB Ac. •( u �' . 119 - .01 AC.f (5 (]3.68 AC.s1 • •( '05 0259EJ (1 dc. - 6189'1 - • - 411 E2 {0.1] Ac!)• 1.29 M. )' , 6219 )5 At 6249'1 • • (11.25 iq • (8.21 4c.t) 09EI I . • • ,(].44 Ac.2) - • - - . q. 4 4119E • • A ) . (5.41 At. • • {0.09 4Gt) 6149'1 0.53 A • 1)y49, Ac.x/ •' 1 19c 2491 4119EI 1.5 .x) , 9 0.02 t 4241 • • • 6219'2 (0.59 - •4 I•' 4119'3 ••• 4c.f (0.3 At •. •.•�•�•�••• •• ,'(3.46 4119'1 (1).09 AC.f)• (.34A • 19E 62191 - 64 AC. s)'•' 6259E � • '24 0.t2 Ac! .' 169 ' • 3219'1 (0. 2 44.21• Ac. t) - 4119E] 2.45 AC.lj • • . • (50.59 #c.$) J219 • • II (1.20 Ac.f) � El � (2.48 U. 119'3 . 6249'2 (4.28 AC EriYES• 4119'1 , •(5'q � .54 - • - (1.34 Act • 2]9EI 419'2 -41 628 1 ♦' .46 AC 6219E .(0.68 A0.2)(O.SB Ac.;) ' `0.34 At.t) 5.50 6249E 624 ES • 4119 119E1 `62 9EI 424• 621 E2 624 EI 119'1 4119 411 EI • 3219 119'1(1.49 4c.r) 119EI (0.51 (1.44 Ac.!) (0.19 AC.f) 4119'2 (0.01 A0.0 (1.20 M.0 (1.39 qcs) (10.60 Ac.t)(1.)1 Act) (0.56 Oct) (0.1] U.t) (0.53 A0.!) (0.22 A[.f) 321 EI (0.14 At. t) (0.05 AC.f) (0.19 U. (0.10 AC.r) 1AWN BY DAZE W.C., F.I 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue DRAWING No MEWED BY DATE Suite Florida PASSARELLA HACIENDA LAKES o1MTT737 C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 VISED DATE Phone (239) 2744067 -Fon lnlmurg 0„ e C, C, /�T A TT c� (; FH IC`.FC:.4 ANT)NYIPTT A\inc X4A1) SHEET No. EXHIBIT 4 WETLAND TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development PUDZ - 2006 -AR -10146 Exhibit: #4 Drawing: #OIMTT737 Wetland Topographic am Can be viewed in the Minutes &Records Dept. — Map was too large for the scanner EXHIBIT 5 SOILS MAP s 0 E X Q F N N EXHIBIT 6 CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951) Ifi o + III _ HENDERSON CREEK CANAL +', �y � 1 I I -- -- .191`30"E 104. �Nar50'27 "E �W 07' -- - --- a,- ----- ., .t - - - - '; i III i J ad ______ i •,� ___ _ _____ _ _ _ _ _ _ °' III do 1 III ` e f IIIf71 sA No ZD e i Illr ZN cDm+ yt + I 1 I 0 c7 II10 �� zy a �F egl r +• I ° rn0 3 1 IIIZ) A�j1 mp I I I N 5c Or cW °vc 7o II i li Om illy v� om a- \ - - - - I I I � °n fin, s u �� ti •• J $ III I a - - - -- 111---------------------- - - - - -- a c III II EXISTING 170' FPL EASEMENT a, _________ ________ ° 5 y�j�,_,, - - - - -- III---------------- - - 48'45"E 33 - - -} J - 1Y,� - - -- � - --'- � III / • ) °� '�, k 8 FIi $ III iy /I ` \ •�_ Ne III III mm III 'm +, F�a cm r U f D v 50 z m c ct Nar48'4 "E 1341. '• + // ` I / �!'7 1 > j m z = qy I! I ur m cn + "ep`C 6 lk U I\ I1 I i u _ ♦ \/ y so nv 1 \ i 11 It � N cd FrI $ N X77 1 II I v x `tea •• , 2 ��[�! ; I 1 \ of I; + I \ ' - -•_r 1 I "Ly �i �"L±"J b (TI H Z o 1 11 ; ` ------------ s o C c) Sar47 14 671.39 I I I I °�+ I I I I I Z I ZD I > I I I II II o y\ io m Vf m � v I m -0 v D -U '-O ;D `d v -0 I I I `= i\ p c r o m c M o �- Zx I c z ( K II i +ggam$ \ 0 m p m z my v_I ao m Z 0 m�+1 p A m -- I I •' II /\ `.Y �� n i p oo I o m + f'*1nZ in r m m I ----- -- I \ r Vf D Z O m 0m D n t7 m i II I \,`~ r?:D A r �Z f7C -zi +t ti>z G)-1 x + + `, \ \, m. iAD z z m m-4 xcn m i c mp D p m C�i rI I I I O 0 10 Zr- OZ r r � m D_W \ +� I p �� Orm y a Z m r v II I I V\ a C1— m z c D N m 0 s 0 m Zm v + I _ _ )D� pxri c �" m O z c7 m )1) \ �Dm 71 m m z O m v m O II `, omeQS,p I I m 1- t I'f - /.�� \ , - - - -- _ A URBAN RESIDENTIAL FRINGE (URF) z 14 + '`�� ~ \ [yr. `i w nt RURAL FRINGE MIXED USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) J a i n \ LE x a o b +a4• +• �.. FsD Dye €r1 ..] b • SAD o ;g� b ��D O� of sQ.� a$ + +.� +•J� Zrn u�1€ "% ' i Zrn 0 0 }' (('�� x; z mvz�9 �-1 %� •, Ong �c��9 ^� LA m 00c !!v22 m DDA DDA A-DJm �mnrn I ADm y� = C A� a <p �pn� Irl I <p .. m + + + Nar38'50 "E 1345.26' Sar41'44'W 2707.07' Soo, 1"w "w 5 50 .63 1345.10' .$ �• •4 C Z D mo g g g mn a N� om 0 7 7 Oy u b. o me 'x Vii L4 I c� +a -b '3 500'35'02"w 1345.93' A, AGRICULTURE a� A, AGRICULTURE I' �Nn ii ;0 u A UNDEVELOPED 0 UNDEVELOPED m�� C Y m i mp"al °-'f4 _ -0> 0 xxxC--j 38 y Z m i m z D O m D m m D o o O m D Z5 m m Z O F m D A Z. OO �mmr m � I oyo� S0o'36'23w 2701.30' g NZO zninyzmc�7 I -i m Ie7 vci D0=OD m Z0D0 I €(n < D C O D ut Orr -- 'O m0 -nipr I ;�� D in Oza) mz 03 0, c D ( D Z_ _ I;n 0 m D CA D A C O Z I < 0 G) Z r�O�Z O�OO I�*A cmo° �Ml omZ I ri*AD o o m = Z m A m m m O I O r .aoc - .1 :ams D x x x P pm mTz -i I -0 1; 9 z >Zt) I D.ZCI I m Wi Iu ) onrr: SEC: "MP. RGE: CLIENT PROJECT: :YfARCN02010 IH<.L91�E. SOS 26L.27L HACIENDA LAKES ���TA>NC" H 5 , 0o SCALE HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. Planning 050150.0203 (FULL)I" =300' r IHALF7 1 " =600' Visualization 010E i9Q, oaA WN. TITLL MPUD/DRI CONCEPTUAL CONSULTING Civil F.ngineering 0501500203P03 C K.ED. MP UD /DR I AL � • • � & SmB�g & ' " snrr'T nunt16 CHECKED: i d 7 A '1' l D 11 A A 1� )" A /-` T AI-' l� TT ►7L A A 1' 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597.0578 8 or 16 D.H.N. WATER L G1L lVltilVt 1U1V1G1V I PLAN 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers Florida 33901 (239) 278 -5224 FAX: (239) 278 -541 - -- / / / / / / / / / ' / / | / L-� � > m 7 -'. 1; -0 COLLIER 13OIJLI5V4R—D CCR` -6-5-1 agrn rn rri EXISTING 170' FPL EASEMENT 68.21, + EXI�TING 170- Ha mm A. 48'00'E 2684 is Coo OD URBAN RESIDENTIAL 1 USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) + VzM rn lb MARCH, 2010 !1 14192MI, 50S 26E 27E INC. MOA C I N() SCALL HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC. HACIENDA LAKES Plmming 050 1 50.02.03 (FULL) (I IALF) 1 �600 "DIA A Visualization 05015002031`09 M.Si. MPUDIDRI CONCEPTUAL CONSULTING Civil B*mdng 9 of 16' D.H.N. WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578 1542 Carson Street, Fo,t Mvers, Florida 33901 (239) 278-5224 FAX: 1239) 278-54191 Z, Lmn / / / / / / / / / � / / / in rn / / / / / / COLLIER 13OIJLI5V4R—D CCR` -6-5-1 agrn rn rri EXISTING 170' FPL EASEMENT 68.21, + EXI�TING 170- Ha mm A. 48'00'E 2684 is Coo OD URBAN RESIDENTIAL 1 USE DISTRICT (RFMUD) + VzM rn lb MARCH, 2010 !1 14192MI, 50S 26E 27E INC. MOA C I N() SCALL HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC. HACIENDA LAKES Plmming 050 1 50.02.03 (FULL) (I IALF) 1 �600 "DIA A Visualization 05015002031`09 M.Si. MPUDIDRI CONCEPTUAL CONSULTING Civil B*mdng 9 of 16' D.H.N. WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578 1542 Carson Street, Fo,t Mvers, Florida 33901 (239) 278-5224 FAX: 1239) 278-54191 0 C C CLIENT. -6 133HS 33S — 3N1-1 I g A, AGRICULTURE +-- ' - - -� -- '� O A m °NO1 "0411"E+ SINGLE - FAMILY HOMES AND PRIVATE NURSERY USES LSE 1 I I zosz.or + ` • C C c c '`�� Om m V) MPUD /DRI - lb A b p t O j O i +� 0 m m m r ITI m N A z z o r z < N00'56'29F 567 �N D4 og!mv m S0056 29 -4 m r rrl Z rn Am mm m O C a Z 0 O O CN _ 0 4 y. ' mgga 0 Y yzX D Q ri °£gg �, i1': c' ' r 0 tmn �1 ffi mPo�`v ^1 i� ° O� m rn) r N -4 Z 0, nC1 m 0 2 rn m r C 0 C C CLIENT. .W �N� 10oao .OD D SCALE (FULL)1" =300' HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. ) egg ��� T�INC PlAilnln g O A m (11ALP 1 °=600 0ti 1 I I a ` C c C C c c I I I Om m V) MPUD /DRI f7 A � D� - D a) MO 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: 597 O SW40'10 ^1i'1361.17- +� 0 m m m r 0V0 m m N A z z o r z < M, 0 �N D4 og!mv m A Z f m O -4 m r �1m0 rrl Z rn Am mm m O C zm 2 0 4 � vi yzX 500'34'02'W 1022.89' : m 1z2 m O Z 0, D C In 2 m o> .. a m 0 Or N p� me o O m ®D9 3'39'20'W 2878.74' R R R CD C C C CLIENT. Z D 10oao '6 "D SCALE (FULL)1" =300' HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. ) egg ��� T�INC PlAilnln g m 0 m O (11ALP 1 °=600 0ti 1 I I I I C c C C c c I I I Om m n 0 0 g z N CD ZD O O mCr Or om m z m W N 'D y; O� Z V) V) -1 C 1 `L C -uOm DOr2r1Nm" o zmAz Zr-0 = V) q 0- p D r Z m W m Z Zm3CNCm0nm �K m �p'0 0-Imm M � - �zo Z- -NZmc� =on Zcn D0�1Dm� OCpDDO r Pi O Z m v D m o Z D r D D A om z o Z m< T) Cmp () m OmZ n�1 mmr -n 0 _iz mom Zo c � o m z Ut A (n CD Z> O O <A m0 r C O � m N I� i II Jc V 2D O 8 Lo O O mm A W OD I � I I c I m I I I I I I� I � I I I i I I I I I I I 1 I I I I DA T1. MARCH, 2010 �y CLIENT. :0 10oao '6 "D SCALE (FULL)1" =300' HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. ) HACIENDA LAKES ��� T�INC PlAilnln g 0 Oo01:iQ0203 (11ALP 1 °=600 1 I I I I I D I I I I Al S.J. GIIECKE °' V) MPUD /DRI f7 A � D� - D a) MO 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: 597 O 7c 0 m m m r 0V0 m m N A z z o r z < M, 0 �N D4 og!mv m A Z f m O -4 m �W �1m0 rrl Z rn Am mm Z O C zm 2 0 4 � Z yzX m O�In () 1z2 O Z 0, N I� i II Jc V 2D O 8 Lo O O mm A W OD I � I I c I m I I I I I I� I � I I I i I I I I I I I 1 I I I I DA T1. MARCH, 2010 SEC: TWP: RG6 li-Ill@LE SOS 26E.27E CLIENT. PROJECT.' '6 "D SCALE (FULL)1" =300' HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC. ) HACIENDA LAKES ��� T�INC PlAilnln g 0 Oo01:iQ0203 (11ALP 1 °=600 Visnalizatton " " "" DRAW. "`Lt' MPUD/DRI CONCEPTUAL CONSULTING CivilFng� ring OSFFTNUXfRVR "FrT " ""16FR Al S.J. GIIECKE °' MPUD /DRI AL � • •i JL SUfVeft&lVapft WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: 597 0 or 16 D.H.V. (239) -0576 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 239 2785224 FAX 239 276 -5419 MATCH LINE — SEE SHEET 9 +" } ` ' I °± MATCH LINE —SEE SHEET 10 „ NOT PART OF °� ' , as ,+ + +tea +wf +THIS PROJECTS ° yQ�_ b + a "� +.p �p +4 yTrYr tJ 1' i. o e A U Am j m i� + N'm m X y + +mop °bm .`d � °Z�mT.��?Y59ri s�p Z. °j iii A�rzAA � ed e?° , m4-IjpzR �iv' +�' } }O� -pip R1 y }4 481 iG + N + L-. Z N O -q r A Cm .�.. 92me ° p m , . °dorm rm °a c;° B'? O' cn �o g1AA bb n }off$ ? + + m g m� } J C0+ + 58T07 20 7e6 4 GV08 W�dd I 3 N N W A NBT07'13 -E 1704.07' _______��;:' '�- + + + } 58T0704'W 807.1 +60 +. yN +1� •^ }a` ____ _ — _______ - _ _ ____ off' ad08 W�`dd F +°'� �} ° ZPo I 9' r I `d D c' Zoe m W N J m[� 0r xy�OxzxxxnxfC zm�zmz�° 1 r_ C �$ y D mC ?� f n 1 O 5 p D r Z m U l m z I 3� oY °m ZD Z.Tm7 ;ANRmmOnm�2 D O� ''WZr Z?NZmm m I Z a I $g me �o�oo tn�D n c 17 xmD p -0 z -U aU�ry� °� m 3 zy I °m �� worm? ° °K`"ZC� fr1 f7 I, I N88'S6'S4'E 1582.00' (M) (n W D n >;u F. p Z I O En m O r Vy I 588'S8'47'W 1582.03' D. r X p Z Z Z� ; cm°° nmm m om e° I )lam omZ �z vim mp0 I 02 � (/) m °v I rD AI'b Om -� 0 ZO DzN °9 N 2 m 1 O;N m D t n m � r r J J $$ pn 1 �Z+1 v a m I C3 °[ r- c: m y °m ( i I i I i S89'15'59'E 1823.18' (M) N89'16'34W 1822.92' (D) I / � Az 2 m € SYn y� c n Z I i o r c oo� mvm TII, t IF x m �' 11 �� II ; ; If o � II x N II x II ®® €mi I Ir 11 z° N� z I I N W n N _ — N pl 589'11 01 2693.80 M) N89'12'25'E 2693.13' (D) 589'09'39�W 269J.18' (M) N89'12'25'E 2693.13' (D) W I g g p a z CD m 4 m�sl Zoa ?FBI " 391 s Cn Y I °o$I 0 O X 1 m rm N " POI mml I I I I I > = U) m I I 1 r c x O A I 'a D Z� I I I m V >;o � 'D rri = 1 C r3"I - g 00 i t I t O COa m A m pA n ��� m r M m i o c l Z O <r�i> 0) y, A N> C3 n ; Z I im m I Z A m r 0N4 m y m' o' -ai W pf�10 m m m tDO p i Z X I I N m Z C n Zm Z ;A 0 X N ti I czmi c - z <y ? X r3 m = I T1 I m I y A m D fONN r m I I m C" 0 z Z rmTl Z CO m O I i Ln m z N O i i e. m I m I 0 I I 0 0 1i I DATE SEC TWP: RGE': CLIENT PHOA(l: MARCH.203 266.27E Pw� , ° SLALE (FULL)I'- rI'ucc�r -3oo HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 1 HACIENDA LAKES �IXTA osalso.o2.03 (HALM 1-600 =' 05015000203PII Ms.;." "TLE MPUD/DRI CONCEPTUAL MPUD/DRI VA JL suFrT n 16e o 1 G D.U.N. D� D.H.:V. W A TER 11 A A 1� T A G C A Al"-' 1�TT WATER 1 1 V(t 1 L V 1 11 761 Vl G 1 V ! P! A 1�T PLAN V 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 597 -0575 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 239 278 -5224 F.. (239) 1111.19 rr I I I I MATCH LINE — SEE SHEET 5 I c D i�o=zxxxtnx C bm g �os� Z D S. Z M Z P p m m x U 9 --j 10 mo pc 0Z��D ' m 0mOz0m�1FA�C =y IC V) N '_D I I I I I I Y O NZ+ Am ��r A v O NND m Moo U8H 0mp pZ0 DOxy ZOz n$ C.: D o ;U0mxZ o ymD D.'Z 5Dz D O oy• FMOZO zm I � m g ;0 Z mp c-V z rn m €t+ °+ �z0 a9 (n 6N '' N o:� N66.56'10'W 2940.59 ---- -- -- - - - --J _ I N ro I }O t _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 I D 1 ___ o ;x W N C• ;2! O 1 t0 s I p C) I r" C c I N I I om I � I I !4 V m I •m-1 I z C r, � 0 A �; z ED'S m A = (� 00 1 m m m , tmil MT mm0 D N r rml = I N � to m � O O m m m z _ I r y y D ITl m C C D OW -m pm0 r0 D N m zz �zm F X N I 2 m i .7 EXHIBIT 7 PUBLIC FACILITIES MAP Hacienda Lakes Map H -1 0 0.2 0.4 Miles a N DIXIA INC. CONSULTING Z \ T 11 JL • Planning • Visualization • Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rjones Printing Date: July 14, 2010 File: T: \Projects\2005 \05_0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakes%DA \Rev01 \ Hacienda H1 DevPlan EXHIBIT 8 TRANSPORTATION MAP ��a��� EXHIBIT 9 MPUD MASTER PLAN u (N N l r --O'� -i z3-i Off_ C D T m y D m y F z O o ;V M -Ti o Z — - - - - - - — - - — - - — - - COWER BOULEVARD (CR 951) > M < m m A 09 a �r- --- -- -- --- -- _ A y m -0 F = D — - - — - - —�- - - -- I - i T -- I -� rHda'�'' cxE K uFw I — O z Z ti I, m jj I 1 - -1 I I T�Q I $ I Id - _ -- y N Z Ul D fTl 11 c n 8% R 1 I 1 IM r N m e 11 I I I Q pp 1 INS r S r O S a m C II 1 I I 1 Jr I ^R't I I I I I I Od^ x> D O O II - 1 1 -_ --1 1 r O co II I I J N m O A O - ' - - -- -- -- diTINIT 1roi vrL �In• --- - ---- -- N? m Z Z 8 n - -. -___ 0'Z z 00 N °a Z �� i T - - -- - �� 4`rv�� a p Z m y A Z 11 i I -- r pp 1 I ir$ &y III r A OX A n N m 1�1 A i1229 I M z o z = fTl k 1 3 ^eo I r F �z cn I-I X N II 0 < = m 11 A r pQQQQ ti D 17 O II l 77 r. t zoo ? z ii - - -- r ❑ M r z z m p ENO cz W ii a g N D-1 r D 3 Zrm s O W ( 10 3 Z O F y m •a r 11 Rflw aRINGE R - Sr..r.�...ra��.:.:ra.�..+:. -'• q"�:7i:.'.�55.3_..'_�..i.. RIIR�L PRINCE MIXED USE _. -. -. y?'C"y-- ._. -.- _ _ _. -, _._.- .- ._. -.- _ p _ .9F�- UD9W RESDENTNL ifiNCE (URi�_ _ _ - _ 3 7 DISTRICT D> r„ '71 r i � i LAii nii MM USE DISTRICT (Rii i •o H A 4 aA 5 ><9 Y � k4f e m 0 r € ion o (n v �y n Z E C fj V fl ^ T ran AAi1 A9 m 9n n o - 8m �o o T 3Sa A mm 0 LA 0i_ 310 d� �o gqc T T 3�AO �C ivmmi -z a CT �4 "iR ° rya r!O '$ ng N Q M 71 ro o p$ °roq 0 900 4 Co N A AGRICULTURE w 2 UNDEVELDPED z C III ;O oZ Z �mb im mA 3 i 4 _ a mmm 00 MM pOAO Zm DrT.II�COm�z O�n O Ano 000 O mm0z -Z om j UN�OI/�O °m`m0- uz yy 0 mm Z � r<`ir� D °D° f<'1p OpmO• O x0.1]12 3 m; NX. < A210m Nm YY mr-E; N m0IC/fyC �?ONV Cm[D- f*1 ?Oy Or°n0 l7 rV1ZI �? +� IT, 000 NOO D A °A ZNOO °Z NmD NOm °�OrII O CZ� ;oS mmm y; m m 0.0 moD- IwDODy x z; r�'1 n1y z y�_y'P< O p rrr v N.V V1 to to yo om ° m O OQA °�"W4 o�M. Z 2 < COS m yrZZ.0 Y 2 2 ® ® ®D 000 ° ° ti m �OTp° r°nO mYA r 0.U1 M m { -i zA2m< m - - a m,l]mmO Ammmzr om_ Z mtiz_ c z_OV -i M.. y , < m m m A ry = yy N_ ?N"� ZC? .Zpl OyI. II II II ff D m V1 -m z >0E>91 Z > a AN O 5DSV1>mA mWr`1 xlZm y- OOOF- A 3 3 3 3 AWE y� s zP2 zmi °r6 m M m Y -- - (rtOV m m O —0,60 m -I�0 CyCm .. 1C mV� Czm-- m ° r s cn0 ANM vxa _°c z o�i m (N Vf VI ° fC/12CrC- D1Nn�0� mlm/1 Omm z ;m7m C z m Z n A cc- My NONmm Z�I 6OO W-- m- 8 z -1N ;X9 CO '� y DDD m O ° C' vl O°ZO~ m-IOm -O mm mmC zi0 'Z W l o F F F_ $ mmm c1x ym- �ycarmDX o °m mo vm° om oo_I�n (n fP a A A z mmm mm m m mN2F�NZZ�mm m00 Cpl CMZ� V -Z�mr F= _..__ -_- __ __ -.__ �______ C C C C 000 prD Z �Op °p��mo Om° NC �� vmrn m02 -gym M 7 7 7 7 mm !,1 ° ° o I2i10 °Z'+ICi1m�u 2 >m zm Oc�j _ n n WOE y0 C C �2D0 <Z'j .-- M-m I vOC mz Z'0jC O O O O cmm m0 W I, Z ZOD y -- r AEI _I yNmy Nm Z L C L! NZO W m m 6�A2 O< D Tf > I �' v +t� O CIS: m ! r2.1x1° O II II 0 mGCn D6MM2 >r'* rN.l; Am D Z Z D my C A-y2 D ° 0ti (Tj (A, is ,D z °cnnm mzvc�rr��� >c z< s ca v_1n0 x N p� Om N �rp.ID yM �jn m[r[--D cY,�> MMC Pj Z ;Z�rrl� m .l1 .gym to yyFOmm >�1N>� O ;X x-'♦ me v'zyr^y.I m 2cZ'8 mr m O O O.a r°mr g <��2 my Oln Zz =Cm DA SO ~ SD my j y Nti�'Im; �jONOC°C tC/1�A NO °m Vl ;0 UI U == _ r> - 0p0 ZO m m >Za yTo: -- mi� N�O °A p00 mpOZZ <�� R• C C m m TI <NO A DOm yp C Nr.1C Om mV1m 0� m m <O °m go IN, ZO_0 m- ZV ONN2 z p NNN �O �ZNZ yC FDO• -'f°^� 0W 0z 50 m-01r xm O O MONO M -Xmao ?2 �m tiNZOmf Cr.I Om CsC,C O O S�OA0 1D mox OND Ny mrMr� y? -1�-ir -26 2M> V mO'm� 0 ~D� r OZ CD myxlCs2 m y ? ~ m n rA`12 P�0{-3mmX ,ZjOZ fAZ 2Cyl C0 m0 kmrD m2 ;mm1 000 OrG,I D 1ZmmZ= V18 Z Z rO Za NN�01, lnNy �� zOm �N°Z. �V) co m m ��oy� mr'10A oymm mm = (A D^ C. .0 A om CMF >0N �7y MC Om n y?mC Z N O, O 0 mMNV cxo;>D nm �1y 0\ 02 mzNi� �L m O�mmrSZ� mZ N� mN 0zx 9y m0 N N 0Om AZ >m ZO�z °O O� P� NGmOQ i'x x x ,10 SON m "m MW 0ca X, Z' y pN y Z �O�; rO00 m> MW x^ Om Cym MN li My 0 0 z>m6yr'1 I`2 m A(n CO mz mNmvO f x < < by D m 01 z^ ox- 4 dzi�r m m rmizDO- ,..M0�i1 °o 0 °m° z�rrri °a - OA71 SEC': 7'3P: RGE' (:LIE�NT. PROJECT ,MARCH, 2010 II i092�25,V 50S 26E,27E INC. OROJI(1 NO SCALE. HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LL C HACIENDA LAKES n Pining 050150.02.03 (FULL) 1— 1000' T (HALF) 1 • =2000' Visualization 01,50 DRAM. ,TILEI OVERALL MPUD/DRI CONSULTING Civil Engineering O50I500203P02 M.S.J. MPUD /DRI � � • •A JL Surveying SL MWing .SIIFET NUAIHf'H: C(ILCKLU MASTER PLAN V 1542 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 (239) 539) 275 FAX: (239) 597 -0578 2 or 16 D.H. N. 1542 Carson Street, Fort Myers, Florida 33901 239) 27 &5224 FAX: 239) 27 &5419 -1 n 9 W V 2 � �� O 'o $ n O O\ nnno'z zzzy a ' m N gz m D � � s� c m n c C� C m d m O C7 m N= 3 z m m� to A � n Z � n� m� n c m rr D A I r0 p � m cNn � o �` � Z I � n � � Z o � r N \ C r D O y q y O n n C pW m N I'T1 � fNr1 D � � o m c N fNrl O VI � � �� ,�' D n O O\ ' m N m D � � s� c m n c C� C m D O C7 m N= z m m� to A � n Z � n� m� n c m rr D A y r0 p � m cNn � o �` � Z � n � � Z o � r � \ C r D y n n p m N I'T1 � fNr1 D � � o m c N fNrl O y o � r D N J � CA -4 v A M � N N (A W J �*��+T1 D � H' FF LIT F� FF Ft A F� OD F� O�1 F� FF W U Ff m D D D D µ N � N VAm1 N V N� N fm/1 .e EXHIBIT 10 AERIAL WITH ON -SITE AND ADJACENT PRESERVE MAP EXHIBIT 11 PROJECT LOCATION WITH LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Z .' 0 i OU OEM I aq - LY i UO v.---zww- H IL Q W W J m W a K o cr CT z r Z Q uols�Dwnn r. IoM (18 ONmnd- ( a a N z r N " 3 O (M-18 S3GVI9)J3A3 N r IT D Q r r O 3FQ FrJ O - � Z!K W rN Quo =o3N� raa Qc�3Q x ¢ W ;zwrail 0 3:0 zYo I�i°u1 °Q ui O y F O O W W W Z r D r e J J J 3 O 000O W J w w Op 2 U Z w 3 U U U ] rf ) W W¢ U �0 rJ J L G'p9p �O Oyjl V O O N N m � o GYN �s r WA 20 :011 U OL F, r U & N O r U N Z W OC N m > d N v (N OJ m N D r 2 J U r _ W N W y p Z N F H W m & N_ F J p U) Q m r p r J W p z N LUX U- N N U m Q z LL z O_ ' U m W N W , m W E r U Z m 0 N r W V w w Fx W J ~ z z> z X E r F p V d Y z D LL t= 3 E W 7 Q Y O_ r J LL Q Q w r U U U. W N Q p r Q Z Z Q O p W U 0 W Q J z F- N D O > J J r 0 Z J Z Z W > Z W W p >> 23 m N D U O U 2 W m W W r W r 7 Z? U t7 p W W W J Z Z Z Q Q Q O O Q N W p W > X LL LL LL p m) 2 W [O U U W 2?? J F w= a' K � �0 III soI Doll IgoI00 Z .' 0 i OU OEM I aq - LY i UO v.---zww- H IL Q W W J m W a K o cr CT z r Z Q uols�Dwnn r. IoM (18 ONmnd- ( a a N z r N " 3 O (M-18 S3GVI9)J3A3 N r IT D Q r r O 3FQ FrJ O - � Z!K W rN Quo =o3N� raa Qc�3Q x ¢ W ;zwrail 0 3:0 zYo I�i°u1 °Q ui O y F O O W W W Z r D r e J J J 3 O 000O W J w w Op 2 U Z w 3 U U U ] rf ) W W¢ U �0 rJ J L G'p9p �O Oyjl V O O N N m � o GYN �s WA 20 :011 _ -_ O U O H \ IVW 3Sf1 ONVI 38010A 111181HY3 \II- 91- 2 \SIISIHY3 \SI3 \0102 \SI9 \S34Vl VON3IOVH \LfL11NI0\IOOZ\f EXHIBIT 12 UPLAND AND WETLAND PRESERVE MAP s` a t 3 i i a LEGEND: `N WETLAND PRESERVE (1281.25 Ac.t) SCALE: 1" = 1600' WETLAND ACCESS EASEMENTS/ ROW -NOT PART OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT (31.45 Ae.t) y OSW PRESERVE (0.32 AC.t) OSW PRESERVE -NOT PART OF P/L CONSERVATION EASEMENT (5.41 AC.t) UPLAND PRESERVE (259.83 AC.t) UPLAND ACCESS EASEMENTS/ ROW -NOT PART OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT (8.97 AC.t) LANDS NOT INCLUDED IN PROJECT AREA ^ SURVEYED WETLAND LINE LAKE - v _ -LAKE - -LAKE- AK AK RESIDENTIAL -LAKE - -LAKE- -LAKE - AK -LAKE - NOTES: -LAKE - LAKE BuORNSCHOOLL SITE PLAN PER RWA, INC. ;.® ;. ;. ;.: ;; DRAWING NO.0501500203PMOI.DWG DLAKE DATED APRIL 29, 2011. •. PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER RWA, INC. ` ` ` ' ` ` ` ` DRAWING N0.2010 -01 -07 BNDY.DWG ATTRACTION DATED JANUARY 7, 2010. SURVEYED WETLAND LINES PER .. ;.:. ;. ;. ;. ;. ;. ;. ;. BANKS ENGINEERING, INC. DRAWING NO.PODS FOR APPROVAL I- II- 2010- PN- MOD.DWG DATED JANUARY II, 2010. P/L JR DEPUTY f'f'' SCHOOL AKE FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM I' =200' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. LAKE FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COMMERCIAL f uKE- ; ;.'. ;.:. COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION -LAKE- SYSTEM K •; 4�. SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999). LAKE - -LAKE - RESIDENTIAL -LAKE - LAKE- LAKE AKE- -LAKE- -LAKE- -LANE- • •� •' �. . KE '. . ' . ' . ' . ' . ' . ' . ' . ' . . . ... . . . . . . .. % P/L ` .o-. .y. ;. . .... A. .......... ... m . : .. .... g. DRAWN BY DATE DRAWING No. W.C. 3/2/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue REVIEWED BY DATE Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 77�� Fort Myers, Florida 33912 C. .ice. 3/2/10 IWPASSARELLA T TnT AATTI AXTTI \V7L'TT AXTT-\ nn ucr;ni TT- 1l An SHEET Na EXHIBIT 13 AERIAL WITH SURVEY TRANSECTS AND LISTED SPECIES LOCATIONS N 6 CzO N O N D K i X N N J T O O N H 3 Q W a a n EXHIBIT 14 FLUCFCS DESCRIPTIONS HACIENDA LAKES FLUCFCS DESCRIPTIONS Recreational (FLUCFCS Code 189) This area is occupied by the Florida Sports Park with associated parking areas and facilities. Unimproved Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212) This upland land type identifies areas that are part of an abandoned agricultural field. The canopy and sub -canopy of this upland habitat are mostly open with scattered slash pine (Pinus elliottii), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), and young melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinquenervia). The ground cover is dominated by bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) and smutgrass (Sporobolus indices) with dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), St. Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum), carpetgrass (Axonopus spp.), blackroot (Pterocaulon virgatum), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), caesarweed (Urena lobata), shrubby false buttonweed (Spermacoce verticillata), and love grass (Eragrostis spp.) Rural Open Land (FLUCFCS Code 260) This upland land type identifies an old agricultural area that includes two old farm buildings. The canopy vegetation includes slash pine and cabbage palm. Sub -canopy vegetation is mostly absent with occurrences of cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and melaleuca. The ground cover vegetation is similar to Unimproved Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212). Low Pasture. Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 262) �j This wetland land type identifies areas that are part of an abandoned agricultural field. The canopy and sub -canopy of are mostly open with scattered slash pine, cabbage palm, melaleuca, and cypress (Taxodium spp.). The ground cover is dominated by torpedograss (Panicum repens) and includes a variety of upland, wetland, and transitional herbaceous species which vary by season. Palmetto Prairie Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 3219 El) The canopy of this upland habitat is absent or may contain scattered slash pine, cabbage palm, earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and less than 25 percent melaleuca. The sub -canopy contains saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto and contains varying combinations of beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia), staggerbush (Lyonia fruiticosa), hog plum (Prunus umbellata), gallberry (Ilex glabra), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), wiregrass (Aristida stricta), pennyroyal (Piloblephis rigida), muscadine grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbrier (Smilax spp.), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), love vine (Cassytha filiformis), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia). Palmetto Prairie Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 3219 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 3219 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and/or sub - canopy. Palmetto Prairie Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 3219 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 3219 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and/or sub - canopy. E14 -1 Palmetto Prairie Disturbed (76 -100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 3219 E4) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 3219 E3 with greater than 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Pine Flatwoods Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 El) The canopy of this upland habitat is dominated by slash pine and may contain scattered cabbage palm, live oak, earleaf acacia, and less than 25 percent melaleuca. The sub - canopy consists of slash pine and wax myrtle with occasional dahoon holly (Ilex casine) and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto with varying combinations of gallberry, saltbush, muscadine grapevine, greenbrier, love vine, poison ivy, pennyroyal, bracken fern, and beautyberry. Pine Flatwoods Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4119 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Pine Flatwoods Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Pine Flatwoods Disturbed (76 -100% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4119 E4) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3 with greater than 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Pine, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4159 E) I The canopy of this upland habitat contains slash pine with scattered cabbage palm, earleaf acacia, and melaleuca. The sub - canopy contains slash pine, cabbage palm, melaleuca, and Brazilian pepper. Typical ground cover includes cabbage palm, bahiagrass, wax myrtle, ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), pennyroyal, wild coffee (Psychotria sp.), greenbrier, muscadine grapevine, love vine, and widely scattered saw palmetto. Pine, Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159133) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4159 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Pine, Disturbed (76 -100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E4) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4159 E3 with greater than 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Brazilian Pepper Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 422 1) The canopy of this highly disturbed wetland area is dominated by Brazilian pepper and may contain occasional melaleuca, slash pine, and cypress. The sub - canopy is dominated by Brazilian pepper with wax myrtle and /or saltbush. The ground cover is absent or may include sparse Asiatic pennywort (Centella asiatica), frog -fruit (Phyla nodiflora), dog fennel, water pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata), buttonweed (Diodia virginiana), and /or mock bishop's weed (Ptilimnium captillaceum). E14-2 Melaleuca (FLUCFCS Code 424) The canopy of this highly disturbed upland area is dominated by melaleuca with widely scattered slash pine. The sub -canopy consists of melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. Ground cover is generally sparse and may include saltbush, wiregrass, broomsedge, dog fennel, myrsine (Rapanea punctata), creeping oxeye (Sphagneticola trilobata), and/or poison ivy. Melaleuca, Hoc (FLUCFCS Code 4241) This highly disturbed wetland area consists of a canopy dominated by melaleuca and may contain widely scattered slash pine and/or cypress. The sub -canopy may be sparse or dense with melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, slash pine, wax myrtle, and saltbush. The ground cover is often bare ground/leaf litter, or may consist of a combination of yellow -eyed grass (Xyris spp.), hatpins (Eriocaulon decangulare), rush fuirena (Fuirena scirpoidea), sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum), creeping oxeye, and /or climbing hempvine (Mikania scandens). Several of the areas identified by this code were previously pine /cypress habitats with high degrees of melaleuca whose vegetative composition has been altered by wildfires. Most pine and cypress trees in the canopy were killed by the wildfires, while the melaleuca trees persisted. Tropical Hardwood Hammock Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4269 E 1) The canopy of this upland habitat contains live oak (Quercus virginicus), laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), cabbage palm, and scattered slash pine and gumbo limbo (Bursera simaruba). The sub - canopy typically consists of myrsine, Coco -plum (Chrysobalanus icaco), cabbage palm, red mulberry (Morus rubra), and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes wild coffee, Boston fern (Nephrolepis exaltata), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), cabbage palm, greenbrier, and scattered saw palmetto. Tropical Hardwood Hammock Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) 'FLUCFCS Code 4269 E'?� The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4269 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Live Oak, Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4279 E1) The canopy of this upland community type contains live oak, laurel oak, and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy contains wax myrtle and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes saw palmetto, caesarweed, saltbush, poison ivy, greenbrier, and wild coffee. Live Oak, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4279 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4279 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Cabbage Palm Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4289 E1) The canopy of this upland habitat contains cabbage palm, slash pine, and melaleuca. The sub - canopy contains cabbage palm, myrsine, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes wax myrtle, Brazilian pepper, caesarweed, saw palmetto, bahiagrass, and flatsedge (Cyperus spp.). A few of the areas identified by this code were previously pine flatwoods whose vegetative composition has been altered by wildfires. Most pine trees were killed in the wildfires while cabbage palm and melaleuca survived. E14-3 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4289 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4289 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. A few of the areas identified by this code were previously pine flatwoods whose vegetative composition has been altered by wildfires. Most pine trees were killed in the wildfires while cabbage palm and melaleuca survived. Cabbage Palm Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4289 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4289 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. A few of the areas identified by this code were previously pine flatwoods whose vegetative composition has been altered by wildfires. Most pine trees were killed in the wildfires while cabbage palm and melaleuca survived. Hardwood/Conifer Mixed, Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4349 ED This upland community has a canopy consisting of slash pine, live oak, laurel oak, and cabbage palm. The sub - canopy contains dahoon holly, wax myrtle, myrsine, Brazilian pepper, and cabbage palm. The ground cover includes saw palmetto, dog fennel, caesarweed, and wild coffee. Ditch (FLUCFCS Code 514) The canopy is typically open. The sub -canopy may contain Brazilian pepper, Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), and primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana). The ground cover typically consists of paragrass (Urochloa mutica), dotted smartweed (Polygonum punctatum), pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata), arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia), and cattail (Typha spp.). Willow, Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6189 E I The canopy and sub -canopy of this wetland habitat is dominated by Carolina willow and may include buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), primrose willow, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover typically consists of sawgrass, fireflag (Thalia geniculata), arrowhead, pickerelweed, pepper vine (Ampelopsis arborea), paragrass, saltbush, and/or Asiatic pennywort. Willow, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6189 EQ The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6189 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent exotics in the canopy and sub - canopy. Cypress. Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6219 E 1) The canopy of this wetland habitat is dominated by cypress and may also include red maple (Acer rubrum), swamp bay (Persea palustris), cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The sub -canopy may contain Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, cabbage palm, myrsine, pond apple (Annona glabra), and buttonbush. The ground cover includes maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), wax myrtle, rush fuirena, corkwood (Stillingia aquatica), swamp fern, beakrush (Rhynchospora spp.), and giant leather fern (Acrostichium danaeifolium). Cypress, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6219 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6219 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and/or sub - canopy. E14-4 Cypress, Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6219 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6219 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Pine /Cypress Disturbed and Drained (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 62459 E2) This historically hydric community no longer exhibits signs of hydrology and, therefore, was mapped as an upland community. The canopy consists of slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The sub -canopy contains slash pine, cabbage palm, downy rose -myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa), and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes muscadine grapevine, caesarweed, dog fennel, poison ivy, cabbage palm, and scattered saw palmetto. Pine /Cypress Disturbed and Drained (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 62459 E3� The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 62459 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca, downy rose myrtle and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 0 -24% Exotics FLUCFCS Code 6249 E1 The canopy of this wetland habitat typically consists of slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The sub - canopy may contain slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, melaleuca, and /or Brazilian pepper. The ground cover consists of a combination of swamp fern, rush fuirena, corkwood, water pennywort, rosy camphorweed (Pluchea rosea), and cabbage palm. Pine /Cypress, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 EQ The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6249 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Pine/Cypress, Disturbed 50 -75% Exotics FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3 The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6249 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Pine/Cypress, Disturbed (76 -100% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6249 E4) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3 with greater than 75 percent melaleuca in the canopy. Pine /Cypress, Burned (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 624B E2) This code identifies areas burned by a wildfire in May 2009. Prior to the wildfire, the community type was identified as FLUCFCS Code 6249 E2. At the time the FLUCFCS map was updated, the living vegetative community was not evident due to the recent damage by the wildfire (i.e., dead pine and cypress trees, no recruiting vegetation); therefore, the area was assigned the code and exotic level of the habitat prior to the wildfire and denoted with a `B." Pine /Cypress, Burned (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 624B E3) This code identifies areas burned by a wildfire in May 2009. Prior to the wildfire, the community type was identified as FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3. At the time the FLUCFCS map was updated, the living vegetative community was not evident due to the recent damage by the wildfire (i.e., dead pine E14-5 and cypress trees, no recruiting vegetation); therefore, the area was assigned the code and exotic level of the habitat prior to the wildfire and denoted with a `B." Hydric Pine Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6259 E1) The canopy of this wetland habitat consists of slash pine and melaleuca with scattered cabbage palm and earleaf acacia. The sub -canopy contains slash pine, melaleuca, myrsine, dahoon holly, cypress, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes sawgrass, blue maidencane, corkwood, yellow - eyed grass, gulf muhly (Muhlenbergia capillaris), gulfdune paspalum (Paspalum monostachyum), and /or rush fuirena. Hydric Pine Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6259 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6259 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Hydric Pine, Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6259 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6259 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Hydric Pine Disturbed (76 -100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6259 E4) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6259 E3 with greater than 75 percent melaleuca in the canopy. Hydric Pine Burned (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 625B E3) This code identifies areas burned by a wildfire in May 2009. Prior to the wildfire, the community type was identified as FLUCFCS Code 6259 E3. At the time the FLUCFCS map was updated, the living vegetative community was not evident due to the recent damage by the wildfire (i.e., dead pine and cypress trees, no recruiting vegetation); therefore, the area was assigned the code and exotic level of the habitat prior to the wildfire and denoted with a `B." Hydric Cabbage Palm Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6289 E1) The canopy of this wetland habitat contains cabbage palm, scattered slash pine, myrsine, and less than 25 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper. The sub - canopy consists of cabbage palm, slash pine, and melaleuca. The ground cover includes cabbage palm, swamp fern, dog fennel, Asiatic pennywort, rush fuirena, yellow -eyed grass, and occasional saw palmetto. Hydric Cabbage Palm Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6289 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6289 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Hydric Cabbage Palm Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6289 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6289 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Wetland Forested Mixed. Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6309 ED The canopy consists of cypress, laurel oak, red maple, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The sub- E14-6 canopy contains pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana), cabbage palm, myrsine, wax myrtle, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes swamp fern, sawgrass, greenbrier, and Asiatic pennywort. Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6309 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6309 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Wetland Shrub, Disturbed (50 -75% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6319 E3) The canopy and sub - canopy of this wetland habitat typically contains Carolina willow, primrose willow, and Brazilian pepper with scattered wax myrtle, buttonbush, cypress, and /or melaleuca. The ground cover in many areas is dominated by paragrass and /or torpedograss and may include pepper vine, swamp fern, sawgrass, pickerelweed, arrowhead, fireflag, maidencane, and Asiatic pennywort. Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (0 -24% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6419 E1) The canopy is open with widely scattered cypress. The sub - canopy is open with scattered Brazilian pepper, Carolina willow, and /or primrose willow. The ground cover consists of pickerelweed, arrowhead, fireflag, spikerush (Eleocharis interstincta), smartweed, maidencane, and torpedograss. Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (25 -49% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6419 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6419 E 1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Disturbed Land (FLUCFCS Code 740) The canopy and sub - canopy strata are generally open with scattered cabbage palm, melaleuca saplings, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover contains species typical to disturbed areas including dog fennel, ragweed, caesarweed, creeping oxeye, sweetbroom (Scoparia dulcis), white beggarticks (Bidens pilosa), sandspur (Cenchrus spp.), smutgrass, saw palmetto, smutgrass, and bahiagrass. Disturbed Land H dric fFLUCFCS Code 740 1) The canopy and sub - canopy strata are typically open and may contain scattered wax myrtle, melaleuca, and /or Brazilian pepper. Ground cover vegetation is generally absent, or may contain torpedograss, blue maidencane, frog -fruit, rosy camphorweed, yellow -eyed grass, bushy broomsedge (Andropogon glomeratus), and Asiatic pennywort. Borrow Area (FLUCFCS Code 742) These open water habitats include areas of emergent and littoral vegetation including cattail and spikerush. Spoil (FLUCFCS Code 743) The canopy stratum of this disturbed area is open. The sub - canopy contains Brazilian pepper. Ground cover vegetation includes dog fennel, creeping oxeye, and Brazilian pepper. Berm (FLUCFCS Code 747) The canopy of this altered area contains scattered slash pine, cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper, and/or E14-7 melaleuca. The sub - canopy contains Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes species typical in upland disturbed areas including dog fennel, ragweed, caesarweed, white beggar - ticks, and Brazilian pepper. Road FLUCFCS Code 814) This code identifies areas occupied by paved roads. Unpaved Road (FLUCFCS Code 8146) This code identifies areas occupied by unpaved roads. Utilities (FLUCFCS Code 830) This upland area was cleared for, and is occupied by utilities, specifically Collier County's South County Water Treatment Plant Well Field. The ground cover includes smutgrass, bahiagrass, and/or carpetgrass. Utilities, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 8301) This wetland area was cleared for, and is occupied by utilities, specifically Collier County's South County Water Treatment Plant Well Field. The canopy and sub - canopy strata are open. The ground cover is absent in some areas or may contain torpedograss, bahiagrass, carpetgrass, beaksedge, frog - fruit, bushy broomsedge, and rosy camphorweed. Powerline Easement (FLUCFCS Code 832) This area is occupied by Florida Power & Light (FPL) electrical transmission lines. The canopy and sub - canopy are open. Ground cover vegetation is absent in some areas or may consist of bahiagrass, smutgrass, and /or carpetgrass. Powerline Easement H dric FLUCFCS Code 8321) This area is occupied by FPL electrical transmission lines and an access road. The canopy and sub - canopy are open. Ground cover vegetation is absent in some areas or may consist of torpedograss, bahiagrass, blue maidencane, flatsedge, pickerelweed, frog - fruit, bushy broomsedge, and /or rosy camphorweed. E14-8 EXHIBIT 15 NATIVE VEGETATION MAP 6I E (0.00...) { DRAWN BY DATE DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue REVIEWED BY DATE Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 I&PASSARELLA. -- .__ -- _ -- _ --- r,..,�,.,.;.,,. A 'KT ATT \7L' A 7C(� DT A TT(1T.T X A A D FLUCFCS % OF LEGEND: OTES: CODE DESCRIPTION TOTAL 180 RECREATIONAL 79.89 Ac.t 3.5% NATIVE VEGETATION (1,721.97 Ac.t) PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER RWA, INC. 212 UNIMPROVED PASTURE 9.14Ac.± 0.4% WITHIN RFMUD - USED IN REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS (1,413.67 AC.t) DRAWING NO.2010 -01 -07 BNDY.DWG 260 RURAL OPEN LAND 10.54Ac.t 0.5% WITHIN RFMUD - IN ROWS OR ACCESS EASEMENTS (12.91 Ac.t) DATED JANUARY 7, 2010. 262 LOW PASTURE, HYDRIC 54.43Ac.« 2.4% WITHIN URFS - USED IN REQUIREMENT CALCULATIONS (286.87 AC.t) 3219E1 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 27.81 Ac.t 12% o WITHIN URFS - IN ROWS OR ACCESS EASEMENTS (8.52 Ac.t) SURVEYED WETLAND LINES PER 3219E2 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 12.80 Ac.t 0.6% BANKS ENGINEERING, INC. 3219E3 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 3.71 Ac.f 02% NNON- NATIVE VEGETATION (540.17 Ac.t) DRAWING NO.PODS FOR APPROVAL 1 -II- 2010- PN- MOD.DW9 DATED 3219E4 4119EI PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 5.75 Ac._ 90.01 Ac.t 0.3% 4.0% WITHIN RFMUD (210.48 Ac.t) JANUARY II 2010 . 4119E2 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (2549% EXOTICS) 143.78 Ac.t 6.4% WITHIN URFS (329.69 Act) , 4119E3 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 23.49 Ac.t 1.0% 4119E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 0.35 Ac.t 0.0% SCALE: 1 11 s 1600 ( LANDS NOT INCLUDED FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 4159E2 PINE, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 0.77Ac.t 0.3% IN PROJECT AREA I' =200' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND 4159E3 PINE, DISTURBED(50-75 %EXOTICS) 1.78 Ac.t 0.5% LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. 4 PINE, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 6 8.47 Ac.t 0.3% SURVEYED WETLAND LINE 4221 21 BRAZILIAN PEPPER, HYDRIC 1.81 Ac.s 0.1% V ` FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, 424 MELALEUCA 13.7OAc.t 0.6% COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION 4241 MELALEUCA, HYDRIC 345.07 Ac.t 15.3% SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) (FOOT 1999). 4269E1 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 0.40 Ac.t 0.0% 4269E2 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.25 Ac.t 0.1% 4279E1 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 3.BB Ac.t 0.2% 4119EI 4289EI Ac.0 (9.4 4279E2 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 0.29 Ac.t 0.0% 4119E1 4289E1 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0 -24% EXOTICS) 1.20 Ac.t 0.1% 4289.2 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 19.08 Ac.t 0.8% I au9E1 4289E3 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 325 Ac.t 0.1% LIwE1 aesz a<.t) ez49E3 68 c.t) I 4349E1 HARDWOOD /CONIFER MIXED, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 1.47Ac.t 0.1% (0.39 Acx 9 P/L 514 DITCH 3.38 Ac.t 0.1% (2 ` 6189EI WILLOW, DISTURBED(0 -24 %EXOTICS) 10.97 Ac.t 0.5% ez19EZ I (os7 Al x am9E `� 6189E2 WILLOW, DISTURBED(2549% EXOTICS) 2.48 Ac.t 0.1% (.]L Al . 6419EI 6219E1 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 157,74 Ac.t 7.0% 2Z➢AC.t) e219E2 6249.3 0ao Al 1) (2.04 0.91 AC.� 8219.2 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25 -48% EXOTICS) 27.88 Ac.t 12% 1 911 ob AC.) 119E1 -9E1 0.43 -0 6219E3 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 1.45 Ac.t 0.1% I ezw9.3 ( Al. 4279E1 82459.2 PINE / CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (249% EXOTICS) 1.32 Ac.t 0.1% (Y.31 Al 6L19E1 I 0.55 Ac.!) 219E1 82459E3 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (50-75% EXOTICS) 2.38 Ac.t 0.1% 64-2 (1.02 Al 0_ 22 Al . t) 4) 9'. (0.57 AC. f) 8249.1 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 289.18 Ac.t 12.8% 8}01 I 0.96 4c.!) 6249E2 PINE / CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 327.32 Ac.t 14.5% (0.3 dC.0 .19 Al I (06419.1 ) 7 IOE 4119.2 6249.3 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 25823 Ac.t 11.4% 4241 832 (I.N Al .x) 279E (O.ze A.:)( I 0.23 AC.J 8249.4 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 27.88 Ac.t 1.2% b259E2 83 U.ib.1t,. 0.17 Ac.:) ro.19 AC.t 6248.2 PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (25 -4996 EXOTICS) 22.90 Ae.x 1.0% 4119.2 Ac.i2')'° } °� I 3219.1 ME2 624BE3 PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (50-75% EXOTICS) 9.56 Ac.t 0.4% 624 o� 8]Y1 46249121 6219U (0.70 Ac. x) (I.9e AC.!)4I19E2 I ze9EZ dc.t) (24.IB ..4 8259E1 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED 0 -24% EXOTICS ( ) 31.52 Ac.t 1.4% (2.6] 4H91 6249E Co.. ) (I.8 AC. P/L (20.9 1.59..A) 6249E2 6259E2 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (2549% EXOTICS) 27.86 Ac.t 12% (t,BZ AC %Y1.41 Al t) o } C o, 6419,1 0.4o AC.i) 1.54 Ac.t) I (O.BI Ac.i 8259E3 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED 50-75 %EXOTICS ( J 63.26 Ac.t 2.8% 6Y45 (236 p B} 59 5 A 32 WI 7A "" C *) 032 Ac.!) 6259E4 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 12.00 Ac.t 0.5% 4119EI t NI� 122 I', 912 411912 825BE3 HYDRIC PINE, BURNED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.22 Ac.t 0.1% [0.23 AC 99 A 259 6245 4[ t .117 4q 6259.3 (1 a7 act [ 2 3 71 A *) 0181 Ac t) (° 26 Al i) I$ 63-3 0.63 dc.4 8289E1 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0 -24% EXOTICS) 2.64 Ac,t 0.1% ro.v3 6249 E (61 - we} b249 „ Al t I� (0.60 Ac 101 uw11 I t 6 6.63 Ac 6249.1 16.)6 AC.Z) 1 z.5a Aar „ w1s9E3 8289.2 6289.3 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (2549% EXOTICS) HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 8.94 Ac ± 2.09 Ac. *_ 0.3% 0.1% (7 39 70 : -32 21 (1.32 .f) (0.69 ) II (0.9 Ac t) 6249E2 [ p E} 4119.2 (0 20 Ac t eze9El 6309E1 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (0 -24 %EXOTICS) 19.90 Ac.t 0.9% 4119E 411 2 BS Co. s3 A`.�6249 L 4 Ac ) 4119E b2S9E. 6249E3 (3b�9i3 B ,.'.. p o f0 5A t) (I.S d t C.t)(43 AC f) 1.40 AC.f) 0s 6249.2 6309E2 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (254996 EXOTICS) 7.21 Ac.t 0.3% (2.)0 AC.3)(1.17 Ac. (LLB AC 6259E4 ' ` °" (7.66 A-) 6319E3 WETLAND SHRUB, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 5.83 Ac.t 0.3% "A) 411° (0.30 AC.3) 62 912 0 0 Al i) 219E2 u9E3 se u e.47 A0 T a68z 4c. r) 6419E1 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 8.82 Ac.t 0.3% LI 913 (0 > o1 913 1- 1 6259.E (IJ0 AC.t) 321 I (1.19 Act) )LA 198)13) 1- 6259EI at.ff 6419E2 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) ( J 10.83 Ac.t 0.5% (1.55 (0 20 Al (0.2 Ac r) (0 73 45 912 (� ) 4119E 740 DISTURBED LAND 3.21 Ao,t 0.1% 1913 4119.2 6259.3 AC.i A *) 291 (9.OJ At.t) t0. }1 ac. (2.IB AC 0 3219.3 7401 DISTURBED LAND, HYDRIC 18.18 Ac.± 0.8% f (2.88 Act ct) 41 912 (� 6249.} (23.5JAC.k) 624 95 Ac ) z59 Ac') 742 BORROW AREA 5.38 Aat 0.2% 4159.4 (0.2 AC L) 16 ) 24 27 Al , (0.51 (6.41 Ac! (1.01 Ac.t) 19.2 (-I A-) (1,11 A-) I11EI 119.1 1,11 AC. t) 743 747 SPOIL BERM 0.16 Ac.t 0.93 Ac.t 0.0% 0.0% 329EZ (0 03 Al 6219EI ( _ (111 .o5 Aat) 9 814 ROAD 0.32 Ac.+ 0.0% c t 159.} 913 (7.10 A ) 6219 ` *) (1 31 A-) (OJ16 411 EI (.92 Al. ) 8146 UNPAVED ROAD 4.33 Ac.t 02% -* 913 6259 I. 7 MA Act) 830 UTILITIES 1.08 Ac.t 0.0% IC.) 4119 I 1Bo (s.le A-) 71 A 4 (0.4o Al 8301 UTILITIES, HYDRIC 4.82 Ac.t 0.2% ]42 (79.89 Ac.k1 269E I h 42a9E1 (em Ac.: 832 POWERLINE EASEMENT 1.24 Ac.± 0.1% (9 ) Ail- 4119 0.4o u.t) 8321 POWERLINE EASEMENT, HYDRIC 4.27Ac.t 0.2% (2 .e71 a.10 Ac. TOTAL 2282.14 Ac.± 100.0% oack 6259.4 6 }09.11 6249.1 (0.80 Al t (8.70 A-) 0.0J Ac. ) (106.18 Al . k) (0.46o 1 Aci IO I- 9.3 2 0.6 U (5.09 Ac. 6249.3 0198 1 119E 6z49E3 ( ) Ac I (0.641 -) 6249.2 4119.2 ,P" 119 S 0.35 BILE 7401 (0.3 AC 4119.4 6249 -3 8.16 A[.t (0.30 Acx (1 DO AC Y) 4159.1 4119.3 88° .k)"' 740- I 8301 (0.69 Al . x1 1 309E1 6309.1 Ac.t) ( 9 74 2 74 (0.3 AC f (2.44 .!) (0.26 ./x(0.02 8301 L 19.2 .x) 014 8301 830 o' Ac 7 (3.05 Ac.t / /� \\ (I.5 Ac i 6249.2 (21.07 Ac.t) .31 . 195 (0.6 Ac! (I3 At.r) 6 49E2 .,.1 -S 1 \ 6419E 4�,vY2J 123 (3.67 Al .t) (0.29 Act) ( 4119.1 A ) 4119E2 6 19E2 209.1 (00 qC.!) 249 912 (0.62 Al .x) (1.26 Ali) ) 4 23 Al 3) (I.BI ACf) (0 5 b Act 0 289E2 Al 03 119.2 ( 0.31 A[.0 I 4289E2 424 21 2 0.25 A .!) ZS A 42 1 912 ( 0L Act 4119 0 09 Al ) 1119 (0.05 A 9Ei 0.60 Ac.t7 62 ES (7 49 Ac ) 6 49.4 (0.65 AC. t) I 219 (0.452AC.x (10.80 AC.!) At.t) 0.41 914. 4. t) It, 2 Al. 3 Al (_71 A. 289.2 .. ) 4 2.25 A, 424, }2 9.2 (0.04 5 3119" (0.6) Acf) 48L 415 123 6249E 2 (o.92 -o (.06 A[ t) (219.92 Oct) I 5.75 AC. I.YB (0.91 A-) (1.27 Act) W 10.36 (0.94 AC.3) ac.4 6249E2 289E2 I (91.14 Al i) 6249.3 19.2 ).52 Ac. 3119.2 �/' \\ 321 (0.02 A<.t) C4 7. Act) I 42 Q Ac. ) AE (0.99 A[. r) ) 42p[ k) (0.03 Al x) 62 9E3 .L5 Lc' 12L 3219.2 911 .31 24 3219.2 12411 Al t) YYb 6249.4 (46.80 Ac.t) 249.2 (0.93 Al .i (1.79 Ac. ( 6l Al (0.4% ?c. t) (0 8 AC. x) 4289.3 AV\ t0.5Q Act) 414 C7'7 6319.3 289E I .25 4289.2 19 6249.4 (5 3 Ac. :) (OB A !) 4.35 ACi7 ( 99 329EZ (3.5) A .S) � , .,... C� '* © (1.50 Ac.t 0.091A[. t) 4119E 6249E M. Act) t (6.] uAt.!) 3219.2 4159E3 6259.3 ( °' 7 A`'!) 424 321 Es (0. I AC.!) (I.3] c. rl � 32196 (0.00...) { DRAWN BY DATE DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue REVIEWED BY DATE Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 I&PASSARELLA. -- .__ -- _ -- _ --- r,..,�,.,.;.,,. A 'KT ATT \7L' A 7C(� DT A TT(1T.T X A A D ( I l 1 LOA IO I- - -- (0.00...) { DRAWN BY DATE DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue REVIEWED BY DATE Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 I&PASSARELLA. -- .__ -- _ -- _ --- r,..,�,.,.;.,,. A 'KT ATT \7L' A 7C(� DT A TT(1T.T X A A D EXHIBIT 16 SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY MAP Hacienda Lakes 0 1,000 2,000 T ■�) I TA " Feet Special Treatment (ST) Overlay Exhibit AI / 1 CONSULTING A Z \t tl 1 •Planning ' Ckil Engine q S—) ing & %lapping Prepared By nnjonea P tIN Date: nine 21, 2010 File TPrpjec(a\ 2005 \050150.02.03_Ha— aLakeSl M Re4l1 ST_Ov ay\SST_0 —lay=d E EXHIBIT 17 WETLAND QUALITY MAPS F 8501 4241(0.3 AC.!) (0.26 A .t) 832 ( 05 AC.x) 8321 625902 83 0.11 Ac.x7 411902(2.48 Z) 0.14 .01 624 (0.45 Ac.f) 0.24 Ac.f 624901 (2:6] .!}-- 4 „aco (0.04 of)(1.9 am 411902 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 4119 (0.30 Ac.t) 6U. EJ 4119EZ LEGEND: (9.26 4c. I14E2 DI I 624902 415903 11 (1.32 (0. p9 f)b259E3 BaR 903 b249E3 / \C (3.00944 SFWMD WETLANDS 41 9EJ tl ]IO9ALx) (1.55 Ac. (1752.72 Ac ±) ]401 (1.39 At.t) (O.PB AL SFWMD "OTHER SURFACE WATERS" (0.]J .f) (17.85 Ac ±) SCALE: 1" = 1600' 411902 WRAP SCORE OF z 0.65 AC.± 6259E 0.04 AL LANDS NOT INCLUDED IN PROJECT (2.BB AC.f AREA 415904 SURVEYED WETLAND LINE 8501 4241(0.3 AC.!) (0.26 A .t) 832 ( 05 AC.x) 8321 625902 83 0.11 Ac.x7 411902(2.48 Z) 0.14 .01 624 (0.45 Ac.f) 0.24 Ac.f 624901 (2:6] .!}-- 4 „aco (0.04 of)(1.9 am 411902 I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 4119 (0.30 Ac.t) 6U. EJ 4119EZ O.IB 4<.!), • , (9.26 4c. I14E2 DI I 624902 415903 11 (1.32 (0. p9 f)b259E3 BaR 903 b249E3 / \C (3.00944 'u's) 625904 • • 4119 (0.30 Ac.t) 6U. EJ 62 9E O.IB 4<.!), • , 6259 0.41 41 9EJ tl ]IO9ALx) (1.55 Ac. 321 ]401 (1.39 At.t) (O.PB AL (0.]J .f) 415902 411902 6259E 0.04 AL (2.IB LC.f (2.BB AC.f 415904 6Y49E3 4119EJ (0.T1 Ac.4119 (6.4) AC.f (1.01 Ac.l7 0.05 AL! 903 6259E Ac.k) (O.JI Ac.! 4119E 180 0.18 09.89 Ac.!) 742 (0.0] A .: 4119U (2.60 Ac. )401 m. AL ]40 O.G6 Ac. 4119 4119E1 0.39 Ac.l 6219E2 (0.5] AC. 6219E2 0.3o AC. 624903 (1.31 Ac.f 6419E2 0.62 AC.!) NOTES PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER RWA, INC. DRAWING NO.2010 -01 -07 BNDY.DWG DATED JANUARY 7, 2010. SURVEYED WETLAND LINES PER BANKS ENGINEERING, INC. DRAWING NO.PODS FOR APPROVAL 1 -11- 2010- PN- MOD.DWG DATED JANUARY II, 2010. FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM I" =200' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ( FLUCFCS) (FDOT 1999). (1.03 AC.4 6249E2 (oA ..f)- 3219EI- (0.)8 -4 6119E1 (0.81 Ac.0- 6249E2 (1.8) Ac.r}- 6319E3 (0.50 AC.Q, 9 A, (0. ( 9JS AC t) 624902 411902 \ (0.20 Ac.lF 8146 8.16 Ac.f ��/ (0.30 ]LOL 4159E2 4119E3 630 8301 (0.69 AC.i) 19 • •31IE7... (2.LL 74 2.]4 AC 411902 6249E 8301 Eo (0.3 1A1.0 (I.5 Ac. 0.6 M. 0.3 L .r) (1.95 A .k) (0 3 Ac.! 614902 6419. �159E .4C.r) ).19 A-) 411902 6 O(0 �AL426902 • 0.09 AC.3) 4119 '(0.05 AC.f 119EI i (].49 AC ) 6 4904 ., 624903 p249E4 (0. 2 Ac. 6.32 AC.f) • �415 E3 6249E 2 (0.92 Ac.!) 411902 • • • • • • • • • • 4241 0.91 A-) (1.2] AC.0 8J I (0.36 AC.3) . . K. . . . .. ;219.92 .(0.94 AC. f) 09• (0.02 4c.!) • 4.]6 Ac.!) 6249 . • f A eX9E4 ••(46.80 ALS)• • • • • • ♦ • ♦ • • , • . ` .(.,6t AC. (0.93 '•', 6SWES (5.3 i • . U:9. 289E U:9. ALt)• '(01 624404 6419 ( /�'(v..y( •I(P89ET�. `• • 2.)3 �3 • (0. 4 eC.t)fJ 5. 4111 0.18 AC.!) 1 626901 ]45 f •.' 4z I (0.22 4S 63 EI 6 1902 (0.09 4c.k) 1 (1.14 t 4 (I.pB k.!) � I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I mi �C 424 (o.484 3214E2 424 0.04 A Alift FLUCFCS % OF CODE DESCRIPTION TOTAL 180 RECREATIONAL 79.89Ac.± 3.5% 212 UNIMPROVED PASTURE 9.14 Ac. ± 0.4% 260 RURAL OPEN LAND 10.54Ac.a 0.5% 262 LOW PASTURE, HYDRIC 54.43 Ac. t 2.4% 3219E1 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 27.81 Ac.:t 1.2% 3219E2 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 12.60 Ac.± 0.6% 3219E3 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 3.71 Ac.± 0.2% 3219E4 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 5.75 Ac.± 0.3% 4119E1 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (0.24% EXOTICS) 90.01 Ac.s 4.0% 4119E2 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 143.78 Ac. ± 6.4% 4119E3 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 23.49 Ac. ± 1.0% 4119E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76.100% EXOTICS) 0.35Ac.± 0.0% 4159E2 PINE, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 6.77 Ac.± 0.3% 4159E3 PINE, DISTURBED (5D.75% EXOTICS) 10.78 Ac. ± 0.5% 4159E4 PINE, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 6.47 Ac.± 0.3% 4221 BRAZILIAN PEPPER, HYDRIC 1.81 Ac.± 0.1% 424 MELALEUCA 13.70 Ac. ± 0.6% 4241 MELALEUCA, HYDRIC 345.07 Ac, ± 15.3% 4269E1 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) OAOAc.± 0.0% 4269E2 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.25 Ac. ± 0.1% 4279E1 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 3.89 Ac. ± 0.2% 4279E2 UVE OAK, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 0.29 Ac.± 0.0% 4289E1 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 1.20 Ac.± 0.1% 4289E2 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 19.08 Ac.± 0.8% 4289E3 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (50.75% EXOTICS) 3.25 Ac. ± 0.1% 4349E1 HARDWOOD /CONIFER MIXED, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 1.47Ac.± 0.1% 514 DITCH 3.38 Ac. ± 0.1% 6189E1 WILLOW, DISTURBED (0.24% EXOTICS) 10.97Ac.± 0.5% 6189E2 WILLOW, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.48 Ac. ± 0.1% 6219E1 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0.24% EXOTICS) 157.74 Ac.± 7.0% 6219E2 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 27.66 Ac.± 1.2% 6219E3 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.45Ac.± 0.1% 62459E2 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 1.32 Ac.± 0.1% 62459E3 PINE / CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (50.75 %EXOTICS) 2.36 Ac. *- 0.1% 6249E1 PINE/CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 289.16 Ac. ± 12.8% 6249E2 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 327.32 Ac.± 14.5% 6249E3 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 258.23 Ac.± 11.4% 6249E4 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 27.86 Ac.± 1.2% 624BE2 PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 22.90 Ac.± 1.0% 624BE3 PINE/CYPRESS, BURNED (50-75% EXOTICS) 9.56Ac.± 0.4% 6259E1 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (0.24% EXOTICS) 31.52Ac..t 1.4% 6259E2 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 27.86 Ac. ± 1.2% 6259E3 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 63.26 AC.± 2.8% 6259E4 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 12.00 Ac.± 0.5% 625BE3 HYDRIC PINE, BURNED (50.75% EXOTICS) 1.22 Ac.7 0.1% 6289E1 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 2.64 Ac.± 0.1% 6289E2 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 6.94 Ac.± 0.3% 6289E3 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 2.09 Ac.± 0.1% 6309E1 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 19.90 Ac. ± 0.9% 6309E2 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 7.21 Ac.± 0.3% 6319E3 WETLAND SHRUB, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 5.83 Ac.± 0.3% 6419E1 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (0 -24% EXOTICS) 6.82 Ac.± 0.3% 6419E2 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 10.63 Ac. ± 0.5% 740 DISTURBED LAND 3.21 Ac.± 0.1% 7401 DISTURBED LAND, HYDRIC 18.16 Ac..t 0.8% 742 BORROW AREA 5.38 Ac. ± 0.2% 743 SPOIL 0.16Ac.t 0.0% 747 BERM 0.93Ac.± 0.0% 814 ROAD 0.32Ac.± 0.0% 8146 UNPAVED ROAD 4.33 Ac. ± 0.2% 830 UTIUTIES 1.OBAc.± 0.0% 8301 UTILITIES, HYDRIC 4.82 Ac.± 0.2% 832 POWERUNE EASEMENT 1.24 Ac. ± 0.1% 8321 POWERUNE EASEMENT, HYDRIC 4.27 Ac. ± 0.2% TOTAL 2262.14 Ac. ± 100.0% .80 A .k) 219E3 6] 4!8 AL!) 24 (0.03 424 ) 424 4241 0.09 Ac.!) (S.]p Ac.z) 9 (0.4] 4c.r) 418903 / .37 / 4P4 321903 • N6- 4 0.40 AC x) 29 • • •(111 AC.!)' 3219E2 (0 24 Ac321901 w 4c .) (0.56 Ac. ' (193 ALf) 321902 LO 624603 J219E2 011443) 01 60 AcM (0.08 Ac. F , (I.B1 443 411901 . •626902 329E ,' (1. e3 Ac.x (0.96 Ac.! .5624603 • 12 0.18 4c. 119 .43219E2 • (0.52 AL 6259E3 26 4119 1.10 Ac.r). (IS2 )401 . 624963 260 (0.59..f 0.364c.t)• (10.5624903 ]401 (4.33 Ac(3.60 Ac E2 6219EI . . . (1.26 Ac! 5 L -4241 (0.10 Ac r) 6219E2 (0.62 , (15.92 (0.63 A .! 42]9E1 (0.54 AC.4 • 18901 621903 (1.45 PL 6P49E 621902 .•(4).96 Ac.f) ` . (2.3] AL3 • • 024901 • . 621911 6249 • • (O.e A6.!) 0.1 -0 (2. 61 411901 (O.J2 Ac.f 4119E3 0. 0 AC.!) 624903 4119E2 (23.04 A<.t) 4269 2 . (0.02 4L • •4119E2 21 6 ( 61 x)••219 •.i ).• 24901 ' 411901 1 0.85 • 4241 • 26.60 AC- Z) • •4159E3 6149E `,(0.]9 A- 9 62490] In ne er. ►mi 4119EI 6T59E2 Sy Ac.!) (4.88 AC., x°10 40 624903 ,. (9.29 AC. f)• 321901 (0.33 AC .O 12190 iE 424 r) ,(15.45 4e U 4119E2 -,rte 1.89 AC.!) e� 0.39 A-) (10.60 AL.01.]I Ac. x) (0.56 A, 1) 6249E3 40902 (1.42 4c.r) (0.93 -) "`.► p DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 REVIEWBD BY DAM C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 sHBSrNo p1, 31 >r7tot7?astnA7 cogs "I(; g .... A .,., WF.TT ANTI 01 lAT TTY MAP P r e Ys ',: s ; 424 (o.484 3214E2 424 0.04 A Alift FLUCFCS % OF CODE DESCRIPTION TOTAL 180 RECREATIONAL 79.89Ac.± 3.5% 212 UNIMPROVED PASTURE 9.14 Ac. ± 0.4% 260 RURAL OPEN LAND 10.54Ac.a 0.5% 262 LOW PASTURE, HYDRIC 54.43 Ac. t 2.4% 3219E1 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 27.81 Ac.:t 1.2% 3219E2 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 12.60 Ac.± 0.6% 3219E3 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 3.71 Ac.± 0.2% 3219E4 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 5.75 Ac.± 0.3% 4119E1 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (0.24% EXOTICS) 90.01 Ac.s 4.0% 4119E2 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 143.78 Ac. ± 6.4% 4119E3 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 23.49 Ac. ± 1.0% 4119E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76.100% EXOTICS) 0.35Ac.± 0.0% 4159E2 PINE, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 6.77 Ac.± 0.3% 4159E3 PINE, DISTURBED (5D.75% EXOTICS) 10.78 Ac. ± 0.5% 4159E4 PINE, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 6.47 Ac.± 0.3% 4221 BRAZILIAN PEPPER, HYDRIC 1.81 Ac.± 0.1% 424 MELALEUCA 13.70 Ac. ± 0.6% 4241 MELALEUCA, HYDRIC 345.07 Ac, ± 15.3% 4269E1 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) OAOAc.± 0.0% 4269E2 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.25 Ac. ± 0.1% 4279E1 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 3.89 Ac. ± 0.2% 4279E2 UVE OAK, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 0.29 Ac.± 0.0% 4289E1 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 1.20 Ac.± 0.1% 4289E2 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 19.08 Ac.± 0.8% 4289E3 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (50.75% EXOTICS) 3.25 Ac. ± 0.1% 4349E1 HARDWOOD /CONIFER MIXED, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 1.47Ac.± 0.1% 514 DITCH 3.38 Ac. ± 0.1% 6189E1 WILLOW, DISTURBED (0.24% EXOTICS) 10.97Ac.± 0.5% 6189E2 WILLOW, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.48 Ac. ± 0.1% 6219E1 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0.24% EXOTICS) 157.74 Ac.± 7.0% 6219E2 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 27.66 Ac.± 1.2% 6219E3 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.45Ac.± 0.1% 62459E2 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 1.32 Ac.± 0.1% 62459E3 PINE / CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (50.75 %EXOTICS) 2.36 Ac. *- 0.1% 6249E1 PINE/CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 289.16 Ac. ± 12.8% 6249E2 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 327.32 Ac.± 14.5% 6249E3 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 258.23 Ac.± 11.4% 6249E4 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 27.86 Ac.± 1.2% 624BE2 PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 22.90 Ac.± 1.0% 624BE3 PINE/CYPRESS, BURNED (50-75% EXOTICS) 9.56Ac.± 0.4% 6259E1 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (0.24% EXOTICS) 31.52Ac..t 1.4% 6259E2 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 27.86 Ac. ± 1.2% 6259E3 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 63.26 AC.± 2.8% 6259E4 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 12.00 Ac.± 0.5% 625BE3 HYDRIC PINE, BURNED (50.75% EXOTICS) 1.22 Ac.7 0.1% 6289E1 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 2.64 Ac.± 0.1% 6289E2 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 6.94 Ac.± 0.3% 6289E3 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 2.09 Ac.± 0.1% 6309E1 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 19.90 Ac. ± 0.9% 6309E2 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 7.21 Ac.± 0.3% 6319E3 WETLAND SHRUB, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 5.83 Ac.± 0.3% 6419E1 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (0 -24% EXOTICS) 6.82 Ac.± 0.3% 6419E2 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (25.49% EXOTICS) 10.63 Ac. ± 0.5% 740 DISTURBED LAND 3.21 Ac.± 0.1% 7401 DISTURBED LAND, HYDRIC 18.16 Ac..t 0.8% 742 BORROW AREA 5.38 Ac. ± 0.2% 743 SPOIL 0.16Ac.t 0.0% 747 BERM 0.93Ac.± 0.0% 814 ROAD 0.32Ac.± 0.0% 8146 UNPAVED ROAD 4.33 Ac. ± 0.2% 830 UTIUTIES 1.OBAc.± 0.0% 8301 UTILITIES, HYDRIC 4.82 Ac.± 0.2% 832 POWERUNE EASEMENT 1.24 Ac. ± 0.1% 8321 POWERUNE EASEMENT, HYDRIC 4.27 Ac. ± 0.2% TOTAL 2262.14 Ac. ± 100.0% .80 A .k) 219E3 6] 4!8 AL!) 24 (0.03 424 ) 424 4241 0.09 Ac.!) (S.]p Ac.z) 9 (0.4] 4c.r) 418903 / .37 / 4P4 321903 • N6- 4 0.40 AC x) 29 • • •(111 AC.!)' 3219E2 (0 24 Ac321901 w 4c .) (0.56 Ac. ' (193 ALf) 321902 LO 624603 J219E2 011443) 01 60 AcM (0.08 Ac. F , (I.B1 443 411901 . •626902 329E ,' (1. e3 Ac.x (0.96 Ac.! .5624603 • 12 0.18 4c. 119 .43219E2 • (0.52 AL 6259E3 26 4119 1.10 Ac.r). (IS2 )401 . 624963 260 (0.59..f 0.364c.t)• (10.5624903 ]401 (4.33 Ac(3.60 Ac E2 6219EI . . . (1.26 Ac! 5 L -4241 (0.10 Ac r) 6219E2 (0.62 , (15.92 (0.63 A .! 42]9E1 (0.54 AC.4 • 18901 621903 (1.45 PL 6P49E 621902 .•(4).96 Ac.f) ` . (2.3] AL3 • • 024901 • . 621911 6249 • • (O.e A6.!) 0.1 -0 (2. 61 411901 (O.J2 Ac.f 4119E3 0. 0 AC.!) 624903 4119E2 (23.04 A<.t) 4269 2 . (0.02 4L • •4119E2 21 6 ( 61 x)••219 •.i ).• 24901 ' 411901 1 0.85 • 4241 • 26.60 AC- Z) • •4159E3 6149E `,(0.]9 A- 9 62490] In ne er. ►mi 4119EI 6T59E2 Sy Ac.!) (4.88 AC., x°10 40 624903 ,. (9.29 AC. f)• 321901 (0.33 AC .O 12190 iE 424 r) ,(15.45 4e U 4119E2 -,rte 1.89 AC.!) e� 0.39 A-) (10.60 AL.01.]I Ac. x) (0.56 A, 1) 6249E3 40902 (1.42 4c.r) (0.93 -) "`.► p DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 REVIEWBD BY DAM C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 sHBSrNo p1, 31 >r7tot7?astnA7 cogs "I(; g .... A .,., WF.TT ANTI 01 lAT TTY MAP P .80 A .k) 219E3 6] 4!8 AL!) 24 (0.03 424 ) 424 4241 0.09 Ac.!) (S.]p Ac.z) 9 (0.4] 4c.r) 418903 / .37 / 4P4 321903 • N6- 4 0.40 AC x) 29 • • •(111 AC.!)' 3219E2 (0 24 Ac321901 w 4c .) (0.56 Ac. ' (193 ALf) 321902 LO 624603 J219E2 011443) 01 60 AcM (0.08 Ac. F , (I.B1 443 411901 . •626902 329E ,' (1. e3 Ac.x (0.96 Ac.! .5624603 • 12 0.18 4c. 119 .43219E2 • (0.52 AL 6259E3 26 4119 1.10 Ac.r). (IS2 )401 . 624963 260 (0.59..f 0.364c.t)• (10.5624903 ]401 (4.33 Ac(3.60 Ac E2 6219EI . . . (1.26 Ac! 5 L -4241 (0.10 Ac r) 6219E2 (0.62 , (15.92 (0.63 A .! 42]9E1 (0.54 AC.4 • 18901 621903 (1.45 PL 6P49E 621902 .•(4).96 Ac.f) ` . (2.3] AL3 • • 024901 • . 621911 6249 • • (O.e A6.!) 0.1 -0 (2. 61 411901 (O.J2 Ac.f 4119E3 0. 0 AC.!) 624903 4119E2 (23.04 A<.t) 4269 2 . (0.02 4L • •4119E2 21 6 ( 61 x)••219 •.i ).• 24901 ' 411901 1 0.85 • 4241 • 26.60 AC- Z) • •4159E3 6149E `,(0.]9 A- 9 62490] In ne er. ►mi 4119EI 6T59E2 Sy Ac.!) (4.88 AC., x°10 40 624903 ,. (9.29 AC. f)• 321901 (0.33 AC .O 12190 iE 424 r) ,(15.45 4e U 4119E2 -,rte 1.89 AC.!) e� 0.39 A-) (10.60 AL.01.]I Ac. x) (0.56 A, 1) 6249E3 40902 (1.42 4c.r) (0.93 -) "`.► p DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 REVIEWBD BY DAM C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 sHBSrNo p1, 31 >r7tot7?astnA7 cogs "I(; g .... A .,., WF.TT ANTI 01 lAT TTY MAP P • N6- 4 0.40 AC x) 29 • • •(111 AC.!)' 3219E2 (0 24 Ac321901 w 4c .) (0.56 Ac. ' (193 ALf) 321902 LO 624603 J219E2 011443) 01 60 AcM (0.08 Ac. F , (I.B1 443 411901 . •626902 329E ,' (1. e3 Ac.x (0.96 Ac.! .5624603 • 12 0.18 4c. 119 .43219E2 • (0.52 AL 6259E3 26 4119 1.10 Ac.r). (IS2 )401 . 624963 260 (0.59..f 0.364c.t)• (10.5624903 ]401 (4.33 Ac(3.60 Ac E2 6219EI . . . (1.26 Ac! 5 L -4241 (0.10 Ac r) 6219E2 (0.62 , (15.92 (0.63 A .! 42]9E1 (0.54 AC.4 • 18901 621903 (1.45 PL 6P49E 621902 .•(4).96 Ac.f) ` . (2.3] AL3 • • 024901 • . 621911 6249 • • (O.e A6.!) 0.1 -0 (2. 61 411901 (O.J2 Ac.f 4119E3 0. 0 AC.!) 624903 4119E2 (23.04 A<.t) 4269 2 . (0.02 4L • •4119E2 21 6 ( 61 x)••219 •.i ).• 24901 ' 411901 1 0.85 • 4241 • 26.60 AC- Z) • •4159E3 6149E `,(0.]9 A- 9 62490] In ne er. ►mi 4119EI 6T59E2 Sy Ac.!) (4.88 AC., x°10 40 624903 ,. (9.29 AC. f)• 321901 (0.33 AC .O 12190 iE 424 r) ,(15.45 4e U 4119E2 -,rte 1.89 AC.!) e� 0.39 A-) (10.60 AL.01.]I Ac. x) (0.56 A, 1) 6249E3 40902 (1.42 4c.r) (0.93 -) "`.► p DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 REVIEWBD BY DAM C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 sHBSrNo p1, 31 >r7tot7?astnA7 cogs "I(; g .... A .,., WF.TT ANTI 01 lAT TTY MAP P 6219EI . . . (1.26 Ac! 5 L -4241 (0.10 Ac r) 6219E2 (0.62 , (15.92 (0.63 A .! 42]9E1 (0.54 AC.4 • 18901 621903 (1.45 PL 6P49E 621902 .•(4).96 Ac.f) ` . (2.3] AL3 • • 024901 • . 621911 6249 • • (O.e A6.!) 0.1 -0 (2. 61 411901 (O.J2 Ac.f 4119E3 0. 0 AC.!) 624903 4119E2 (23.04 A<.t) 4269 2 . (0.02 4L • •4119E2 21 6 ( 61 x)••219 •.i ).• 24901 ' 411901 1 0.85 • 4241 • 26.60 AC- Z) • •4159E3 6149E `,(0.]9 A- 9 62490] In ne er. ►mi 4119EI 6T59E2 Sy Ac.!) (4.88 AC., x°10 40 624903 ,. (9.29 AC. f)• 321901 (0.33 AC .O 12190 iE 424 r) ,(15.45 4e U 4119E2 -,rte 1.89 AC.!) e� 0.39 A-) (10.60 AL.01.]I Ac. x) (0.56 A, 1) 6249E3 40902 (1.42 4c.r) (0.93 -) "`.► p DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 REVIEWBD BY DAM C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 sHBSrNo p1, 31 >r7tot7?astnA7 cogs "I(; g .... A .,., WF.TT ANTI 01 lAT TTY MAP P 0.39 A-) (10.60 AL.01.]I Ac. x) (0.56 A, 1) 6249E3 40902 (1.42 4c.r) (0.93 -) "`.► p DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 REVIEWBD BY DAM C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 sHBSrNo p1, 31 >r7tot7?astnA7 cogs "I(; g .... A .,., WF.TT ANTI 01 lAT TTY MAP P DRAWING No. W.C., F.L. 2/9/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 REVIEWBD BY DAM C.G.R. 2/9/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 sHBSrNo p1, 31 >r7tot7?astnA7 cogs "I(; g .... A .,., WF.TT ANTI 01 lAT TTY MAP P s` A,..,� v SCALE: 1" = 1600' LEGEND: SFWMD WETLANDS (1752.72 ACt) - WRAP SCORE OF 2 0.65 Ac.t LANDS NOT INCLUDED IN PROJECT AREA V SURVEYED WETLAND LINE WETLANDS IN WETLANDS IN WETLANDS WITH URF WITH RFMUD WITH WETLANDS WETLANDS WRAP SCORE WRAP SCORE WRAP SCORE WETLANDS IN URFS IN RFMUD >_ 0.65 >_ 0.65 2 0.65 PRESERVE 1312.70 Ac.t 52.91 Ac.t 1259.79 Ac.±j 861.27 Ac.t 28.94 Ac.t 832.33 Ac.t IMPACTS 440.02 Ac.x 367.46 Ac.t 72.56 Ac.t 1 90.44 Ac.t 73.23 Ac.t 17.21 Ac.x W.C., F.L. 6/21/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue xEVIEWEDEY DATE Suite 200 C.G.R. 6/21/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 1)1— .o 01W 17AI)OA7 HACIENDA LAKES VkPPASSARELLA WETLAND QUALITY MAP WITH 01MTT737 SHEET No. EXHIBIT 18 FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS BY TOMASELLO CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Determination of Floodplain Encroachment and Compensating Storage Requirements For Site Plan Revised to include Culverts under Sabal Palm Road Hacienda Lakes, Collier County, Florida Prepared for: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 12600 Biscayne Ct. Naples, FL 34105 Prepared by: Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc. 5906 Center Street Jupiter, FL 33458 March 30, 2011 Richard S. Tomasello, P.E. P.E.# 15233 Introduction and Background Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc. was contracted to perform the necessary computations to determine the floodplain encroachment and impacts of the Hacienda Lakes proposed project, now revised to include culverts under Sabal Palm Road. The culverts are proposed to restore historic sheetflow to the areas south of Sabal Palm Road. The floodplain encroachment analysis (aka importer /exporter test) requires a determination of the volume of flood water stored on the predeveloped site (above the wet season water table) during the 100 -year flood stage conditions. If this storage volume is greater than the total 100 -year, 3 -day rainfall falling onto the site then the site is an importer of runoff and compensatory storage is required. This analysis was also accomplished for the 25 -year flood conditions. The assumed rainfall depths (per Volume IV, Basis of Review) are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Return Frequency 3 -day Rainfall Depth (inches) 100 -yr 15.10 25 -yr 11.80 A flood study was recently completed by FEMA, Collier County, and SFWMD as cooperating partners. Draft Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) have been developed and were presented to the local communities as Preliminary FIRMS late last year. The 00-�' same Henderson Creek Model used in the FIS to compute 100 -year flood elevations had also been run to determine the 25 -year flood elevations. The results of those simulations were used in the floodplain storage analyses presented in a previous report dated July 21, 2010. Here, we present a revised analysis using the FEMA study model modified to reflect the installation of culverts under Sabal Palm Road to help restore the historic natural sheetflow south of Sabal Palm Road. The culverts include 1 -54" and 11 -48" diameter CMP's. The computed flood elevations for the existing conditions at the Hacienda Lakes Project site, except for the added Sabal Palm Road culverts, are displayed on Map 1 along with the development basins and the culvert locations. The basin averaged 100 -year and 25- year base flood elevations are displayed on Table 2. Table 2 Computed Average Flood Elevations (ft -NAVD) For Existing Conditions Development Basins (See Map I) Except Sabal Palm Road Culverts Added Basin 100 -,year 25-year 1 9.8 9.6 2 9.7 9.4 3 9.7 9.5 4 9.8 9.5 5 9.8 9.5 The assumed wetseason water table and proposed control elevations for the Project developed basins are shown on the following Table 3. Table 3 Wetseason Water Tables Basin and Control Elevation (ft -NGVD) ft -NAVD 1 10.0 8.7 2 10.0 8.7 3 10.0 8.7 4 10.0 8.7 5 10.0 8.7 wet season water table assumptions provided by RWA Consulting, Inc. Importer /Exporter Analysis The same Collier County Property Appraiser's LIDAR data (as 25' by 25' rasters) used in the RFIS were used to determine the predevelopment ground elevations of each basin. The upland development basin boundaries were overlaid onto the LIDAR raster. The ground elevation of each 25' by 25' LIDAR raster within the development basin �° boundary was compared to the assumed wetseason water table. If the ground elevation was less than or equal to the wetseason water table elevation, the surface storage was assumed to begin at the wetseason water table. If the ground elevation was above the wet season water table, but less than the 100 -year flood stage, the soil storage between the wetseason water table and the ground surface was determined and surface storage was determined between the ground surface and the 100 -year flood elevation. If the ground elevation was above the 100 -year flood elevation, the saturated soil storage (up to 4' of ground water depth) was assumed to exist above the wetseason water table. In this manner a total storage was computed for each topo raster grid (25' by 25'). Once the storage volumes for all of the raster grids representing the basin were determined they were tallied as the total onsite basin storage under the 100 -year flood condition. This total storage volume was then compared to the total volume of rainfall falling on the basin during the 100 -year, 3 -day rainfall (15.1 inches). The storage computations are presented in Appendix A for each of the five development basins and for both the 100 - year and 25 -year flood conditions. Table 4 displays the comparison of basin storage under the 100 -year stage verses the 100 - year, 3 -day rainfall (15.1 inches) volume by basin: Table 4 100 -yr. 3 -day Rainfall Volume acre -feet 291.3 274.7 176.6 24.6 101.3 868.5 Since the storage volume for all five basins under the 100 -year flood stage is less than the total rainfall volume for the 100 -year, 3 -day rainfall, all five basins are considered "exporters" of flood waters and do not require compensatory floodplain storage. A similar analysis comparing the 25 -year flood depths and 25 -year, 3 -day rainfall was also accomplished with the following results in Table 5. Existing Site Storage Volume Existing Site For 100 -Year Stage' Basin (acre -feet) 1 239.5 2 217.7 3 139.5 4 21.9 5 81.1 Total 699.7 214.6 ' See Appendix A 100 -yr. 3 -day Rainfall Volume acre -feet 291.3 274.7 176.6 24.6 101.3 868.5 Since the storage volume for all five basins under the 100 -year flood stage is less than the total rainfall volume for the 100 -year, 3 -day rainfall, all five basins are considered "exporters" of flood waters and do not require compensatory floodplain storage. A similar analysis comparing the 25 -year flood depths and 25 -year, 3 -day rainfall was also accomplished with the following results in Table 5. These 25- year analysis results demonstrate that all five basins are exporters of runoff. When compared as a whole, the combined project is an exporter of runoff during both the 25 -year and the 100 -year design rainfall events. Storage Volume Comparisons — Existing vs Proposed The proposed water management system serving the proposed project was analyzed using the SWMM model to route the 100 -year rainfall. The purpose of the routing was to 3 Table 5 Existing Site Storage Volume 25 -yr. 3 -day Rainfall For 25 -Year Stage Volume Basin (acre -feed acre -feet 1 193.8 227.6 2 152.0 214.6 3 111.5 138.0 4 15.5 19.2 5 57.5 79.2 Total 530.3 678.6 ' See Appendix A These 25- year analysis results demonstrate that all five basins are exporters of runoff. When compared as a whole, the combined project is an exporter of runoff during both the 25 -year and the 100 -year design rainfall events. Storage Volume Comparisons — Existing vs Proposed The proposed water management system serving the proposed project was analyzed using the SWMM model to route the 100 -year rainfall. The purpose of the routing was to 3 determine if the proposed water management system would provide the floodplain storage equivalent to the storage provided by the existing predevelopment site (with proposed Sabal Palm Rd culverts) under the 100 year conditions. The existing conditions storage was determined by comparing the computed 100 -year stages to the existing topography for surface water storage. The ground water storage above the control elevation was also determined. The maximum post development storage was determined from the surface water storage computed by the SWMM model and the soil storage determined from the proposed project pervious areas and their corresponding volumes above the control elevation. The porosity of 0.2 was assumed for the saturated soils of the pervious areas. The existing conditions water volumes were computed for the 100 -year flood stages in the importer /exporter analysis of Appendix A (See Al -A5). The existing conditions water volumes were computed for the 25 -year flood stages in the importer /exporter analysis of Appendix A (See A6 -A10). In Appendix B, the water volumes are totals for the proposed development. The comparison of these totals are displayed inTable 6. Appendix B (B1 -B3) displays the 100 year (with culverts) ground water storage for Basin 1 -5. Appendix B (B4 -B5) displays the 100 year (with culverts) surface water storage for Basin 1 -5, Appendix B (B -6) displays the 100 year (with culverts) total water storage. Table 7 displays a comparison of these totals for the scenario with discharge through the outfall structures. Appendix B (137 -138) displays the 100 year (with culverts, with discharge) surface water storage for Basin 1 -5, Appendix B (B -9) displays the100 year (with culverts, with discharge) total water storage. 4 Table 6 Storage On Storage On Existing Project Proposed Project Site (ac -ft) Site (ac -ft) Basin 000 Yr, w /Sabal Palm culverts) (100 Yr, 3 -Day Rainfall) 1 239.54 283.53 2 217.72 244.99 3 139.52 168.10 4 21.29 28.35 5 81.08 120.56 Total 699.15 845.53 Table 7 displays a comparison of these totals for the scenario with discharge through the outfall structures. Appendix B (137 -138) displays the 100 year (with culverts, with discharge) surface water storage for Basin 1 -5, Appendix B (B -9) displays the100 year (with culverts, with discharge) total water storage. 4 Basin 1 2 3 4 5 Total Conclusions Table 7 Storage On Existing Project Site (ac -ft) (100 Yr, w /Sabal Palm culverts) 239.54 217.72 139.52 21.29 81.08 699.15 (with Discharge) Storage On Proposed Project Site (ac -ft) (100 Yr, 3 -Day Rainfall) 263.38 210.46 153.32 19.50 80.39 727.06 The RFIS model was modified to show the existing conditions with proposed culverts under Sabal Palm Road. The modified model computed 100 -year flood elevations on the Hacienda Lakes proposed site that ranged from 10' NAVD at the northern extremity of the site to 9.7' NAVD at the southern extremity to 9.3' NAVD near Henderson Creek Canal (aka C -951 Canal). South of Sabal Palm Road the flood elevations drop off to 8.5' NAVD. The 25 -year flood elevations range from 9.7' NAVD at the north end to 9.5' NAVD at the southern extremity and 8.9' NAVD near Henderson Creek. All five basins were determined to be individual and combined exporters of runoff and thereby do not require compensatory storage. The analysis of the proposed project demonstrates that the maximum storage volume for the routed 100 -year flood for the proposed project exceed the storage of the existing site with the proposed pipes under Sabal Palm Road. 1375 9ubb"m ID _ PI.Pof .J C.b tdr iwlaer aaoal ram rroaa Mapl 0 750 1.500 1000 /N t V-011 Map 1 Appendix A Importer /Exporter Analysis Basin 1 -100 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culverts Basin 1 (ft -NAVD) 100 yr Basin Average 100 yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.8 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster grid 231.49 total acres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 235.48 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 4.05 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 239.54 1.03 depth of storage (ft) 100Yr, May Rainfall on to site: 291.3 ac -ft 15.1 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -1 Basin 2 —100 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culverts Basin 2 (ft -NAVD) - 100 year Basin Average 100 yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.7 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster grid 218.27 total acres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 217.51 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 0.21 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 217.72 1.00 depth of storage (ft) 100 Yr, 3Day Rainfall on to site: 274.7 ac -ft 15.1 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -2 Basin 3 —100 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culvert Basin 3 (ft- NAVD) - 100 year Basin Average 100 yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.70 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster grid 140.32 total acres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 139.28 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 0.23 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 1 139.52 1 0.99 depth of storage (ft) 100 Yr, May Rainfall on to site: 1 176.6 ac -ft 15.1 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -3 Basin 4 —100 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culverts Basin 4 (ft -NAVD) -100 year Basin Average 100 yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.80 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster 19.55 total acres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 21.29 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 0.00 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 21.29 1.09 depth of storage (ft) 100 Yr, May Rainfall on to site: 24.6 ac -ft 15.1 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -4 Basin 5 —100 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culverts Basin 5 (ft- NAVD) - 100 year Basin Average 100yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.80 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster 80.51 total acres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 79.20 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 1.88 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 81.08 1.01 depth of storage (ft) 100 Yr, May Rainfall on to site: 101.3 ac -ft 15.1 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -5 Basin 1— 25 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culverts Basin 1 (ft -NAVD) 25 yr Basin Average 25yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.6 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster grid 231.49 total acres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 189.76 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 4.05 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 193.81 0.84 depth of storage (ft) 25 Yr, May Rainfall on to site: 227.6 ac -ft 11.8 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -6 Basin 2 — 25 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culverts Basin 2 (ft-NAVD) - 25 year Basin Average 25 yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.4 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster grid 218.27 totalacres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 152.02 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 0.21 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 152.23 0.70 depth of storage (ft) 25 Yr, May Rainfall on to site: 214.6 ac -ft 11.8 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -7 T Basin 3 — 25 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culverts Basin 3 (ft -NAVD) - 25 year Basin Average 25 yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.5 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster grid 140.32 total acres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 111.25 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 0.23 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 111.49 0.79 depth of storage (ft) 25 Yr, May Rainfall on to site: 138.0 ac -ft 11.8 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -8 Basin 4 — 25 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culverts Basin 4 (ft- NAVD) - 25 year Basin Average 25 yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.50 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster 19.55 total acres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 15.48 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 0.00 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 15.48 0.79 depth of storage (ft) 25 Yr, May Rainfall on to site: 19.2 ac -ft 11.8 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -9 Basin 5 — 25 Year Existing Conditions with Proposed Culverts Basin 5 (ft- NAVD) - 25 year Basin Average 25yr flood elevation (ft -NAVD) wetseason water table 9.50 NAVD NGVD 8.7 10 0.01434800 ac /raster 80.51 total acres Surface water vol(ac -ft) 55.60 Ground water vol (ac -ft) 1.88 Total storage vol (ac -ft) 57.48 0.71 depth of storage (ft) 25 Yr, May Rainfall on to site: 79.2 ac -ft 11.8 Rainfall (in) Appendix A -10 Appendix B Proposed Project Storage Ground Water Storage Ground water storage in pervious areas of proposed projects based on RWA Table "Hacienda Lakes Land Use Summary" I Basin 1 Building Area Right of Way & Remaining Open Space: Total Storage Volume Pervious Area Ground Surface Elev = Control Elev. _ Porosity = Ground Water Storage Volume: _ (13.84 -10.0) x 19.96 x 0.2 19.96 ac 13.84 ft -NGVD 10.0 ft -NGVD 0.2 15.33 ac -ft Pervious Area ac _ 53.22 Average Elev = 13.84 ft -NGVD Control Elev = 10.0 ft -NGVD Porosity — 0.2 Ground Water Storage Volume: (1 3.84 — 10.0) x 53.22 x 0.2 = 40.87 ac -ft 15.33 + 40.87 56.20 ac -ft Appendix A -11 '= Basin 2 Building Area Right of Way & Remaining Open Space: Pervious Area = 18.11 ac Ground Surface Elev = 13.89 ft -NGVD Control Elev. = 10.0 ft -NGVD Porosity = 0.2 Ground Water Storage Volume: _ (13.89 -10.0) x 18.11 x 0.2 = 14.09 ac -ft Pervious Area = 24.47 ac Average Elev = 13.89 ft -NGVD Control Elev = 10.0 ft -NGVD Porosity = 0.2 Ground Water Storage Volume: (13.89 - 10.0) x 24.47 x 0.2 = 19.04 ac -ft Total Storage 14.09 + 19.04 Volume 33.13 ac -ft Basin 3 Building Area Right of Way & Remaining Open Space: Total Storage Volume Pervious Area - 11.95 ac Ground Surface Elev - 13.91 ft -NGVD Control Elev. = 10.0 ft -NGVD Porosity - 0.2 Ground Water Storage Volume: _ (13.91 -10.0) x 11.95 x 0.2 = 9.34 ac -ft Pervious Area = 21.48 ac Average Elev = 13.91 ft -NGVD Control Elev = 10.0 ft -NGVD Porosity = 0.2 Ground Water Storage Volume: (13.91 - 10.0) x 21.48 x 0.2 = 16.80 ac -ft 9.34+16.80 26.14 ac -ft Appendix B -2 I Basin 4 Building Area Right of Way & Remaining Open Space: Total Storage Volume I Basin 5 Building Area Right of Way & Remaining Open Space: Total Storage Volume Pervious Area = Ground Surface Elev = Control Elev. _ Porosity = Ground Water Storage Volume: _ (14.15-10.0) x 2.48 x 0.2 = 2.48 ac 14.15 ft -NGVD 10.0 ft -NGVD 0.2 2.06 ac -ft Pervious Area = 0 ac Average Elev = 14.15 ft -NGVD Control Elev = 10.0 ft -NGVD Porosity = 0.2 Ground Water Storage Volume: (14.15- 10.0)x0 x0.2 = 0.00 ac -ft 2.06+0 2.06 ac -ft Pervious Area = 0.00 ac Ground Surface Elev = 11.27 ft -NGVD Control Elev. = 10.0 ft -NGVD Porosity = 0.2 Ground Water Storage Volume: _ (11.27 -10.0) x 0 x 0.2 = 0.00 ac -ft Pervious Area = 59.3 ac Average Elev = 11.27 ft -NGVD Control Elev = 10.0 ft -NGVD Porosity = 0.2 Ground Water Storage Volume: (11.27 - 10.0) x 15.06 x 0.2 = 15.06 ac -ft 0 +15.06 15.06 ac -ft Appendix B -3 SURFACE WATER STORAGE 100 YEAR (WITH CULVERTS) Basin 1- Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft -NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake1 13.48 1143980.95 3375.01 Lake14 Lake2 13.48 303325.04 6085.13 Lake3 13.47 429444.24 1903.58 Lake4 13.48 969882.01 3580.44 Lake5 13.48 1015275.25 8399.26 Lake6 13.48 519343.36 2402.82 Lake7 13.47 252813.04 1782.51 Lake8 13.47 1202312.22 7605.67 Lake9 13.47 553523.30 5114.95 Lake10 13.47 587495.86 3525.98 Lake11 13.47 1837660.02 5329.51 Lake12 13.47 1153355.87 9416.32 OFF -ROW -1 13.47 169.31 7453.48 9968580.5 65974.6 227.3 Basin 2 - Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft-NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake13 13.49 957616.24 1481.17 Lake14 13.49 784650.52 3126.47 Lake15 13.49 356621.40 2442.94 Lake16 13.49 2857731.92 14960.75 Lake 17 13.49 1181038.51 2784.61 Lake18 13.49 2455643.34 8536.61 Lake19 13.49 608156.85 4141.78 Lake20 13.49 367214.71 1593.65 Lake21 13.49 579307.14 3095.90 OFF -ROW -2 13.49 169.53 6284.18 10148150.2 48448.1 231.9 Appendix B -4 Basin 3 - Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft -NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake22 12.90 923309.52 3190.18 Lake23 12.90 281156.55 3049.89 Lake24 12.90 1704906.99 6188.01 Lake25 12.90 603794.58 2537.51 Lake26 12.90 978923.60 3330.61 Lake27 12.90 1804249.37 7107.61 6296340.6 25403.8 144.0 Basin 4 - Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft -NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake28 14.35 1146012.49 883.26 1146012.5 883.3 26.3 Basin 5 - Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft -NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake29 1 12.08 4596889.93 1187.66 4596889.9 1187.7 105.5 Appendix B -5 TOTAL WATER STORAGE (GROUND AND SURFACE) Basin 1 227.33 + 56.2 = 1283.53 ac -ft Basin 2 231.86 + 13.1 = 1244.99 ac -ft El Basin 3 143.96 + 24.1 = 1 168.10 ac -ft Basin 4 26.29 + 2.06 = 28.35 ac -ft Basin 5 105.50 + 15.1 = 1 120.56 ac -ft Total Appendix B -6 845.53 ac -ft SURFACE WATER STORAGE WITH DISCHARGE /0-%, 100 YEAR WITH DISCHARGE (WITH CULVERTS) Basin 1- Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft -NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake1 13.34 1016603.3 3378.4196 13.22 Lake2 13.34 275836.2 6085.1278 Lake3 13.34 911488.5 3580.4385 13.20 Lake4 13.34 953627.3 8399.2572 Lake5 13.34 486711.7 2402.8203 Lake6 13.34 240256.4 1782.5068 Lake7 13.34 1123258.4 7605.6656 Lake8 13.34 508968.2 5114.9458 Lake9 13.34 546603.1 3525.9827 496082.5 Lake10 13.34 397833.8 1903.5844 Lake11 13.33 1637467.8 5329.5068 48455.7 Lake12 13.31 991863.8 9419.7337 OFF -ROW -1 13.31 167.3 7453.4754 9090685.7 65981.5 207.2 Basin 2 - Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft-NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake13 13.23 758505.4 1481.1717 Lake14 13.22 655013.7 3126.4682 Lake15 13.20 295843.6 2442.9358 Lake16 13.20 2437590.5 14968.3663 Lake17 13.21 1009370.6 2784.6148 Lake18 13.22 2158905.6 8536.6117 Lake19 13.23 512444.0 4141.7799 Lake20 13.22 320349.4 1593.651 Lake21 13.22 496082.5 3095.9034 OFF -ROW -2 13.20 165.9 6284.1813 8644271.3 48455.7 197.3 Appendix B -7 Basin 3 - Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft -NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake22 12.69 797610.4 3190.1808 Lake23 12.69 247167.8 3049.8884 Lake24 12.69 1557299.6 6188.0083 Lake25 12.69 546324.5 2537.51 Lake26 12.69 867243.3 3330.6055 Lake27 12.69 1637057.1 7112.7031 5652702.7 25408.9 129.2 Basin 4 - Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft -NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake28 13.58 760669.3 883.4214 760669.3 883.4 17.4 Basin 5 - Surface Water Storage Junction Name Maximum Stage ft -NGVD Maximum Volume cubic -ft Beginning Volume cubic -ft Total ac -ft Lake29 11.53 2847088.9 1193.1745 2847088.9 1193.2 65.3 Appendix B -8 TOTAL WATER STORAGE (GROUND AND SURFACE) WITH DISCHARGE Basin 1 207.18 + 56.2 = 1263.38 ac -ft Basin 2 197.33 + 13.1 = 1210.46 ac -ft Basin 3 129.18 + 24.1 = 1 153.32 ac -ft Basin 4 17.44 + 2.06 = 1 19.50 ac -ft Basin 5 65.33 + 15.1 = 1 80.39 ac -ft Total 1 727.06 ac -ft i"1 Appendix B -9 EXHIBIT 19 CD CONTAINING HARVEY HARPER WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS AND PHASE I SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT AND PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT BY ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. Hacienda Lakes Mixed Use Planned Unit Development PUDZ- 2006 -AR -10146 Exhibit: #19 Drawing: #OIMTT737 Harvey Harper — Water Quality Analysis Can be heard /seen in the Minutes &Records D - cvinvn EXHIBIT 20 RED- COCKADED WOODPECKER CAVITY TREE AND FORAGING SURVEY SUMMARY (2003 - 2004) FOR TOLL - RATTLESNAKE DRI/MPUD TOLL - RATTLESNAKE DRI/MPUD RED- COCKADED WOODPECKER CAVITY TREE AND FORAGING SURVEY SUMMARY February 2007 INTRODUCTION Surveys for the red - cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis) were conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. within suitable pine habitats located on the 2,251.86± acre Toll- Rattlesnake DRI/MPUD (Project). The Project site was divided into seven sections. RCW non - nesting season foraging surveys were conducted for 14 consecutive days in each of the sections in October through December 2003. Nesting season and cavity tree foraging surveys for the RCW were conducted for 14 consecutive days in each of the sections in April through May 2004. METHODOLOGY Survey methodology was conducted according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Draft Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species (SLOPES) for the RCW (USFWS 2002). Per the SLOPES, the time of day requirements for the nesting season cavity tree survey are one hour before sunrise and ending four hours past sunrise or when local weather conditions are not favorable. Nesting season cavity tree surveys for the Project began at approximately 6:00 a.m. (one hour before sunrise) and ended by 11:00 a.m. (four hours past sunrise). Foraging surveys were conducted by qualified ecologists traversing suitable habitat by foot. Nesting season foraging surveys for the Project began at approximately 8:00 a.m. (one hour after sunrise) and ended by 11:00 a.m. (four hours past sunrise). Non- nesting season foraging surveys for the Project began at approximately 8:30 a.m. (one hour after sunrise) and ended by 11:30 a.m. (four hours past sunrise). Transects and observation stations were recorded on aerial photographs each day, for both surveys. Wildlife observations were recorded for each survey transect. Visual observations were aided by binoculars. Relative weather conditions were also recorded for each survey period. SURVEY RESULTS No RCW's were heard or observed during the October through December 2003 non - nesting season foraging surveys. Two cavity trees located in the central portion of the Project site, just north of Sabal Palm Road, were surveyed for RCW activity during the April through May 2004 nesting season and cavity tree foraging survey. It was noted that the cavity trees did not have resin wells. Neither RCW's nor any other cavity dwelling species were observed on or near the cavity trees. E20 -1 One RCW was observed on May 26, 2004 in the northeast portion of the Project site. This was the only occurrence; no other RCW's were seen or heard during the April through May 2004 nesting season surveys conducted on the Project site. Cavity dwellers including downy woodpeckers (Picoides pubescens), great- crested flycatchers (Myiarchus crinitus), and red - bellied woodpeckers (Melanerpes carolinus) were observed throughout the Project site during the non - nesting season foraging survey and nesting season and cavity tree foraging survey. E20 -2 REFERENCES U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Draft Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species, Red - Cockaded Woodpeckers. E20 -3 EXHIBIT 21 RED- COCKADED WOODPECKER NON - NESTING AND NESTING SEASONS FORAGING SURVEYS SUMMARY (2009 - 2010) FOR HACIENDA LAKES HACIENDA LAKES RED- COCKADED WOODPECKER NON - NESTING AND NESTING SEASONS FORAGING SURVEYS SUMMARY July 2010 INTRODUCTION A non - nesting season foraging survey for the red - cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis) was conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. within suitable pine habitats located on the 2,262.14± acre Hacienda Lakes (Project). The RCW non - nesting season foraging survey was conducted for 14 days between October 13 and December 8, 2009. The RCW nesting season foraging survey was conducted for 14 days between April 15 and May 7, 2010. METHODOLOGY The surveys were conducted in accordance with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) guidelines in the Draft South Florida Survey Protocol (USFWS 2004) for the RCW. In accordance with the South Florida Survey Protocol, the time -of -day requirements for foraging surveys are one hour prior to sunrise to four hours past sunrise or when local weather conditions are not favorable. The non - nesting and nesting season foraging surveys for the Project began at approximately sunrise and ended about three hours past sunrise. The RCW foraging surveys were conducted by qualified ecologists traversing suitable habitat by foot. At regular intervals, the ecologist would stop, look, and listen for RCW activity. Transects were recorded on aerial photographs and wildlife observations were recorded. High quality compact disk (CD) recordings of RCW vocal calls were used. At the observation stations, RCW vocalizations were broadcast at full volume for one minute in opposite directions using a hand -held Sony CD player. Visual observations were aided by binoculars. Relative weather conditions were also recorded for each survey period. SURVEY RESULTS No RCWs were heard or observed during the October December 2009 non - nesting season foraging survey through or during the April through May 2010 nesting season foraging survey. Cavity dwellers including downy woodpeckers (Picoides pubescens), great- crested flycatchers (Myiarchus crinitus), pileated woodpeckers (Dryocopus pileatus), Northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), hairy woodpecker (Picoides villosus), and red - bellied woodpeckers (Melanerpes carolinus) were observed during the non - nesting season foraging surveys. No cavities in live pine trees have been observed on -site. E21 -1 The following listed species were either heard and /or observed during the 2009 — 2010 RCW surveys: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), white ibis (Eudocimus albus), tri- colored heron (Egretta tricolor), wood stork (Mycteria americana), little blue heron (Egretta caerulea), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), and Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) sign (i.e., tracks, scat, etc.). E21 -2 2e REFERENCES U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Revised Recovery Plan for the Red - cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis). 2nd revision. Atlanta, Georgia. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Draft Red - Cockaded Woodpecker South Florida Survey Protocol (adapted from USFWS 2003). E21 -3 EXHIBIT 22 FLORIDA BONNETED BAT SURVEY SUMMARY FOR TOLL - RATTLESNAKE DRI -MPUD TOLL - RATTLESNAKE DRI/MPUD FLORIDA BONNETED BAT SURVEY SUMMARY February 2007 INTRODUCTION Surveys for the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) were conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. within suitable habitats located on the 2,251.86± acre Toll - Rattlesnake Development of Regional Impact (DRI) /Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) (Project). Florida bonneted bat surveys were conducted for five nights on January 9, 10, 11, 16, and 17, 2007 at a total of 14 monitoring stations. METHODOLOGY Determination of presence for Florida bonneted bats was based on systematic field surveys conducted by qualified ecologists. The field survey methodology included an inventory of habitats on the Project site and identification of preferred Florida bonneted bat habitat types. Surveys were conducted each night beginning at or before sunset and continued until temperatures became too low or until no bat calls were being detected. Surveys were not conducted in rain, high winds, or if temperatures dropped below 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Relative weather conditions were recorded for each survey period. Wildlife observations were also recorded for each survey station. Fixed survey stations were established within 300 feet of potential foraging and roost locations. Survey stations were recorded on an aerial photograph. Potential roost locations included buildings and structures. Surveys were conducted for a period of approximately one hour near the building/structure locations to detect roost chatter and calls that may have been emitted as bats left the roost. If little to no bat activity was detected within one hour of sunset at the building/structure location, the survey station was relocated to areas that might provide potential foraging habitat. Potential foraging habitat included open bodies of water, wetlands, open land, and along tree lines (Marks 2006). An acoustic bat detector was used to determine the presence or absence of bats on the Project. The acoustic bat detector gave observers the opportunity to identify which species of bats were being detected, without having to capture them. Acoustic observations gave the observer information about the types of calls produced by any bats that were flying within 300 feet of the equipment, with the most basic parameters being the frequency of the call (its pitch), the shape of the call (how the frequency changes in time), and the rate at which calls are produced (Titley Electronics 2006). This information was plotted on a graph referred to as a sonogram. The AnaBat SD 1 Compact Flash Bat Detector (AnaBat) was used to record bat calls emitted within the Project. E22 -1 SURVEY RESULTS No Florida bonneted bats were observed or detected by the AnaBat system during the January 2007 surveys. A total of five areas on the Project site that contained nearby buildings /structures were identified as suitable survey start locations. A total of nine areas on the Project site were identified as suitable foraging habitat (containing nearby open water, wetlands, tree lines, or open land) and were used as forage stations. Combined, surveys were conducted at a total of 14 stations. The survey collected zero sonograms from bats on January 9, 2007; 22 sonograms on January 10, 2007; 84 sonograms on January 11, 2007; 60 sonograms on January 16, 2007; and 52 sonograms on January 17, 2007. Data obtained from the sonograms indicate that the Brazilian free- tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis) and the Northern yellow bat (Lasiurus intermedius) were present on the property. E22 -2 REFERENCES Marks, C.S. and G.E. Marks. 2006. Bats of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Titley Electronics. 2006. AnaBat SDI Compact Flash Bat Detector Operation Manual. Australia. E22 -3 EXHIBIT 23 DOCUMENTED OCCURRENCES OF LISTED SPECIES M N Z N Z O W F W r a OU N Q U O r w J a Z J m Z LU W w Y J W= Z r a m Y a o J z a J o a Lu c m �p _O LL r aw w F-1 u U U 2 m LL. IL IL IL Nip r� M o JNI p p a N �'p Z U o' S< �p _O LL r aw S. oZ F-1 w o N � w Q o O O O F wo Q 3m �w Nip r� 3w poll U d =w =w ��� a e wa C O] az O) o azo a- w ° a K p oa 0. U o o u �V(O J ro 3 J 3 N 3 w w w w °o u j < m QS O mLL N W r r W W r K O O F p r Z, W J f U f w r u w w V O Q z ww J mwu o Q O ww'!' p 0 �3z Q 3w V ca U W' i 04 8 0 00 • • �•• .A . + • i • ' • •• •• i f • • • • • ' • •o •� • • • • • .• ' ' • • • 2 i • • • •• • • • • • •• • a . • :. •: } so 00 0" '• • • • •• i I w • 2 Z • • • ' ' ' • • • • • • ' • .• • • ••• • • 2 • `0 . •`j 111 • : • . ..� •{! • • • w • • •• �. •'• 1 • • . ••• •• • 0. w •• • 0-4b . • ' ♦' • • ; • • . • • •• •• '•t••« w • 0 0 t� 22 U w1 •• f w • • �• • MII '• • • • • • . W . • • ♦ • • `r • • - -- vI - -• - - 4" ® . ® • ® W ® • U U N, Ir • a� a U � W O w < a .� - — ante VdVeaVe V1NVS � Q d LLJ ® Q • z d CL � ¢ . ; r N W Q LU O . N NUVI3 NnOO •: • Z so rb z', o OI J •1�o O 0 ' •. Q • 1 ) • a z r . • cc 0 � !11 .+ a r�� l 1 21 `25 " �) 0 / ✓ti J - - - -- - _ -. OF! J I1 lnd-18Od8l. H "d LU UL 1 W IIVL /UI /S - QXH 11 91 Z dVH NOIIVJOI S3133dS £Z 11SIH %3 \I 9 Z\S1I61H %3 \SI3 \OIOZ \SIJ \S3UVI VON3I3VH \L£L11WIO \1002 EXHIBIT 24 DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH LISTED SPECIES LOCATIONS J s 0 0 E _x N (n J EXHIBIT 25 SUMMARY OF NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVES BY LISTED SPECIES HABITAT Exhibit 25. Summary of Native Vegetation Preserves by Listed Species Habitat Listed Species Occupied Total Preserve Im act Acres Percent Acres Percent FLUCFCS Codes Acres Florida Panther 4119 El, 6249 El, 6259 E1 410.69 399.14 97.2 11.55 2.8 American Alligator 6189 El, 6419E1, 6419E2 28.42 27.54 96.9 0.88 3.1 Snowy Egret, Little Blue Heron, 6189E1, 6219E1, 6219E2, Tri- Colored Heron, 6219E3, 6249E1, 6249E2, Roseate Spoonbill, 6249E3, 6309E1, 6419E1, 1,109.88 974.37 87.8 135.51 12.2 White Ibis, 6419E2 Wood Stork Florida Black Bear 6249E1, 6249E2, 6249 E3, 934.09 797.83 85.4 136.26 14.6 6259 E1, 6259 E2 Big Cypress Fox 4119E1, 4119E2, 4119E3, Squirrel 6249E1, 6249E2, 6249E3 1,131.99 925.68 81.8 206.31 18.2 Gopher Tortoise 3219 E1, 3219 E2 40.41 31.25 77.3 9.16 22.7 Red - Cockaded Woodpecker 4119E1, 4119 E2, 6259E2 261.65 186.91 71.4 74.74 28.6 E25 -1 EXHIBIT 26 PRESERVE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN HACIENDA LAKES PRESERVE AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN Revised May 2011 INTRODUCTION The following outlines the preserve area management plan for the 2,262.14± acre Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact (DRI) /Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) (Project) located in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, and 25; Township 50 South; Range 26 East and Sections 19 and 30; Township 50 South; Range 27 East; Collier County. The construction of the Project will result in unavoidable impacts to South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) jurisdictional wetlands. In order to offset the loss of wetland functions due to the proposed construction activities, a total of 1,544.14± acres will be preserved, enhanced, and placed under a conservation easement dedicated to SFWMD and Collier County. The conservation area includes 1,281.25± acres of wetlands, 3.06± acres of "other surface waters" (OSW), 259.04± acres of uplands, and 0.79± acre of upland buffer. Enhancement activities will include the removal and long -term maintenance of exotic plant species and supplemental plantings of native wetland vegetation. Several access easements and road right -of -ways (ROWs), totaling 45.83± acres, run through the Project's conservation areas. Hand removal of exotic vegetation will be conducted within the access easements and ROWs; however, the access easements and ROWs will not be used as mitigation for wetland impacts and will not be placed under conservation easement. Wetlands within the preserve areas that are not used for mitigation total 31.45± acres. Upland preserve not used for mitigation totals 8.97± acres, and OSWs not included in the conservation easement include 5.41± acres. EXOTIC REMOVAL The preserve area management plan for the Project site consists of enhancing and preserving 1,281.25± acres of wetlands and 259.83± acres of upland preserves and upland buffers by the removal of exotic species. Exotic removal will be conducted and maintained in perpetuity as required by the County's Land Development Code (LDC), but is not considered mitigation under the LDC. The exotic species to be eradicated include melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia), and downy rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosus). The hand removal of exotic vegetation will include one or more of the following methods: (1) cut exotics within 12 inches of ground elevation, hand remove cut vegetation, and treat remaining stump with approved herbicide; (2) girdle standing Category I exotic vegetation with diameter at breast height (DBH) greater than four inches and apply approved herbicide to cambium; (3) foliar application of approved herbicide to saplings; or (4) foliar application of approved herbicide or hand pulling of exotic seedlings. E26 -1 Exotic vegetative debris will be removed from the preserve area within 100 feet of development areas. In areas beyond 100 feet from the development line, and where the density of melaleuca trees exceeds 50 percent, cuttings will either be removed from the site or stacked in piles at approximately 100 foot intervals. If left on the site, smaller cuttings will be stacked butt end to the ground into a nearly vertical position (i.e., teepee method). Larger cuttings will be cut and stacked side by side into an area approximately six feet on a side. Cuttings will be stacked perpendicular to the previous layer up to a height of approximately four feet (i.e., log cabin method). Supplemental wetland plantings will be conducted in areas where exotic coverage exceeds 50 percent. The removal of exotics within the documented prehistoric archaeological sites will be conducted by hand. If mechanical clearing of exotics is to be conducted within 200 feet of any of the documented archaeological sites, a temporary fence will be placed around the archaeological site. MANAGEMENT, MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING Following the completion of the initial exotic removal effort, semi - annual inspections of the wetland and upland preserve areas will occur for the first two years. During these inspections, the preserve areas will be traversed by qualified ecologists. Locations of exotic species will be identified for immediate treatment with an appropriate herbicide. Any additional potential problems will also be noted and corrective actions taken. Once exotic species have been removed, inspections of the mitigation areas will be conducted annually. The upland preserve areas will be monitored for excessive ground cover and sub - canopy growth. Ground cover and sub -canopy growth will be maintained to enhance maximum wildlife use. Prescribed burns or mowing may be utilized to maintain ground cover and sub -canopy vegetation within fire - dependent habitats of the preserve areas. Required permits from the appropriate regulatory authorities will be obtained prior to implementation of management activities such as prescribed burns. Maintenance will be conducted in perpetuity to ensure that the enhanced, restored, and created wetland and upland preserve areas are free of exotic vegetation. Annual monitoring reports in accordance with the required annual inspections of the preserve will be prepared in perpetuity and will be provided to the County upon request. These reports will address exotic vegetation removal, supplemental plantings, management for listed species, and general maintenance needs for the preserve. Annual monitoring reports in accordance with SFWMD and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permits for the Project will be prepared for a period of five years and will include the following: • Brief description of mitigation and maintenance work performed since the previous report along with a discussion of any modifications to the mitigation or maintenance program. • Brief description of anticipated mitigation and maintenance work to be conducted over the next year. E26 -2 • Results of quantitative vegetation monitoring conducted in the enhanced and created wetlands and upland buffers and preserves. A list of observed wildlife species. • Monitoring photographs taken at photograph stations within the enhanced and created wetlands and upland buffers and preserves. Staff gauge and available local rainfall data. PRESERVE MANAGER The preserve manager is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the preserve management plan until the homeowner's association or assigns takes over from the developer. When the homeowner's association or assigns takes over, they will name a qualified preserve manager and notify the County with the preserve manager's appropriate contact information. Except for approved management activities, the preserve area shall remain in a natural state of perpetuity and not be disturbed by dredging, filling, land clearing, agriculture, and construction related activities or refuse /debris dumping. The contact information for the preserve manager and the developer are as follows: Preserve Manager Developer Ken Passarella David Torres Passarella & Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 3921 Prospect Avenue Fort Myers, Florida 33912 Naples, Florida 34104 (239) 274 -0067 (904) 762 -4454 KenP @passarella.net David @flstardevelopment.com PRESERVE SIGNAGE The enhanced wetland and upland preserve area totaling 1,544.14± acres will be placed in a conservation easement. The conservation easement will be dedicated to SFWMD and Collier County following the SFWMD's conservation easement format. The conservation easement will ensure that the mitigation areas will remain in a natural state in perpetuity. Signs identifying the preserve as a "nature preserve area" will be installed along the interface of the development and preserve. The signage will include language stating "no clearing or dumping allowed." E26 -3 EXHIBIT 27 LISTED SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN HACIENDA LAKES LISTED SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN Revised May 2011 Prepared For: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 3921 Prospect Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 (904) 762 -4454 Prepared By: Passarella & Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274 -0067 Project No. OIMTT737 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................... ..............................1 2.0 Listed Species Surveys ........................................................................ ............................... I 3.0 Preserve Areas ..................................................................................... ............................... 2 4.0 Wildlife Crossing ................................................................................ ............................... 3 5.0 Perimeter Lake Buffer and Fencing .................................................... ............................... 3 6.0 Eastern Indigo Snake Habitat Management Plan ................................. ..............................4 6.1 Biology ..................................................................................... ..............................4 ^ 6.2 Habitat Management Plan ........................................................ ..............................4 7.0 American Alligator Management Plan ............................................... ............................... 6 7.1 Biology ..................................................................................... ..............................6 7.2 Habitat Management Plan ....................................................... ............................... 6 8.0 Wood Stork and Wading Bird Management Plan ............................... ............................... 7 8.1 Habitat Management Plan ....................................................... ............................... 7 9.0 Red- Cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan ................................. ............................... 7 9.1 Biology ..................................................................................... ..............................7 9.2 Habitat Management Plan ....................................................... ............................... 8 1 Table of Contents (Continued) Page 10.0. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Management Plan ...................................... ............................... 8 10.1 Biology ..................................................................................... ..............................9 10.2 Habitat Management Plan ....................................................... ............................... 9 11.0 Florida Black Bear Management Plan ................................................ .............................10 11.1 Biology .................................................................................... .............................10 11.2 Habitat Management Plan ..................................................... ............................... l 1 12.0 Florida Panther Management Plan .................................................... ............................... l 1 12.1 Biology .................................................................................... .............................11 12.2 Habitat Management Plan ....................................................... .............................12 13.0 References ........................................................................................... .............................13 ii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Listed Species Observed on the Project ................................... ..............................2 iii LIST OF APPENDICES Page Appendix A. Project Location Map ............................................................. ............................A -1 Appendix B. Aerial with Listed Wildlife Species Locations ................... ............................... B -1 Appendix C. Aerial with Preserve Areas and Proposed Locations of Wildlife Crossing and Fencing ........................................... ............................... C -1 Appendix D. Aerial with Post - Development FLUCFCS Map of Preserve Areas ...................D -1 Appendix E. Eastern Indigo Snake Informational Pamphlet ................... ............................... E -1 Appendix F. American Alligator Informational Pamphlet .......................... ............................F -1 Appendix G. Florida Black Bear Informational Pamphlet ....................... ............................... G -1 Appendix H. Florida Panther Informational Pamphlet ................................ ............................H -1 iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the Listed Species Management Plan prepared by Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI) for the Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact (DRI)/Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) (Project). The purpose of the management plan is to meet the requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Chapter 10.02.02. The management plan contained in this report pertains to the Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon courais couperi), American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), listed wading birds, Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), and Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). The Project totals 2,262.14± acres and is located in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, and 25; Township 50 South; Range 26 East and Sections 19 and 30; Township 50 South; Range 27 East; Collier County (Appendix A). The Project site generally lies along the east side of County Road 951 (Collier Boulevard) extending one and one -half miles to the east at its northern end and extending three miles to the east at its southern end. Approximately two - thirds of the property lies north of Sabal Palm Road and one -third lies south of Sabal Palm Road. The Willow Run Quarry is along the northern property boundary. Scattered single - family residences and the Winding Cypress DRI are along the southern property boundary. The Picayune Strand State Forest is to the east. The Florida Sports Park and Collier County Sheriff's Junior Deputy Facility are located in the central portion of the property at the eastern end of the extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. An existing farm field is located north of Sabal Palm Road on the eastern portion of the property. The remaining portions of the site are undeveloped lands. A 45f acre outparcel owned by the State is located within the eastern portion of the property. 2.0 LISTED SPECIES SURVEYS Surveys for listed plant and wildlife species have been conducted on the Project site over the past several years by PAI. Listed species surveys were conducted on the following dates: September 10,11,18, and 19, 2002; October 16, 17, and 18, 2002; November 12,13,14, and 15, 2002; June 4, 5, 24, 25, and 26, 2003; October 10, 11, 17, 19, 25, and 26, 2006; and November 14, 2006. On August 11, 12, 13,18,19, and 25, 2009, PAI conducted an updated listed species survey for the Project. Red - cockaded woodpecker non - nesting season foraging surveys were conducted in October through December 2003. Nesting season and cavity tree foraging surveys for the red - cockaded woodpecker were conducted in April through May 2004. An updated red - cockaded woodpecker non - nesting season foraging survey was conducted in October through December 2009 and an updated nesting season foraging survey was conducted in April through May 2010. Listed wildlife species observations made during other fieldwork on the Project site, including Florida Land Use, Cover Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) mapping, 1 wetland flagging, and agency site visits, were also recorded. Table 1 summarizes the listed wildlife species observed on the Project site during fieldwork conducted on -site from 2002 through 2009. Approximate locations of listed wildlife species observed during the August 2009 survey are shown in Appendix B. Table 1. Listed Species Observed on the Project Common Name Scientific Name Status FWCC USFWS Reptiles American alligator Alli ator mississi iensis SSC T (S /A) Gopher tortoise (burrow) Go herus of hemus T -- Birds Snowy egret E retta thula SSC -- Little blue heron E retta caerula SSC -- Tit- colored heron E retta tricolor SSC -- Roseate spoonbill A'aia a'a'a SSC -- White ibis Eudocimus albus SSC -- Wood stork M cteria americana E E Red - cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis T E Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucoce halus -- Mammals Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus ni er avicennia T -- Florida black bear Ursus americanus oridanus T -- Florida panther (sign) Puma concolor coryi E E FWCC — Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service E — Endangered SSC — Species of Special Concern T — Threatened T(S /A) — Threatened due to similarity of appearance * Protected under the U.S. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act 3.0 PRESERVE AREAS The Project's preserve areas will be maintained in accordance with the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Application No. 100126 -5). The preserve areas will be managed to provide habitat for listed species. An aerial showing the locations of the preserve areas is provided as Appendix C. A post - development FLUCFCS and wetlands map for the preserve areas is provided as Appendix D. The Project has been designed to minimize impacts to the listed species that have been identified on the property. The site plan minimizes impacts to the higher quality wetland and upland habitat on the eastern portion of the site. The on -site preserves have been designed to 2 connect to off -site preserves and the Picayune Strand State Forest in order to retain connectivity of wildlife habitat. Development is proposed to occur mostly within habitats on the western and central portions of the site which consist of high percentages of exotics and lack high natural resource value. The Project's preserve areas total 1,589.97± acres, which following mitigation activities will be comprised of 1,315.44± acres of wetlands, 268.80± acres of uplands, and 5.73± acres of other surface waters. The wetland habitats consist mostly of pine /cypress communities, with cypress, hydric pine, hydric cabbage palm, mixed wetland forest, and marsh communities to a lesser extent. The upland habitats consist of pine flatwoods, palmetto prairie, live oak, and cabbage palm. The preserve areas will be managed for listed species based on habitat type, and current listed species utilization. Target listed species include the American alligator, state - listed wading birds, wood stork (Mycteria americana), red- cockaded woodpecker, Big Cypress fox squirrel, Florida black bear, and Florida panther. The wetland and upland preserves, excluding reserved right -of -ways and access easements, will be placed in a conservation easement or other equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the SFWMD. The total preserve area to be placed under conservation easement is 1,544.14± acres. It is anticipated that portions of the preserves will be deeded to the State to compliment the Picayune Strand State Forest. 4.0 WILDLIFE CROSSING Where a road is proposed to cross the preserve area, a wildlife crossing will be constructed to maintain connectivity of the preserve area. Since the portion of the preserve area to the west of the north -south roadway is surrounded by residential development, the wildlife crossing will be a box culvert measuring three feet high by six feet wide to discourage use by large mammals while accommodating the passage of small and medium mammals as well as amphibians and reptiles between preserve areas. To deter large mammals from utilizing the crossing, a large mammal exclusion device (i.e., bars, grate, or similar method) will be used on the box culvert. The invert of the wildlife crossing will be at natural grade and the bottom of the box culvert will be buried in and covered with natural soils that mimic the surrounding substrate. An aerial depicting the proposed locations of the wildlife crossings is provided as Appendix C. 5.0 PERIMETER LAKE BUFFER AND FENCING The Project site design includes a perimeter lake buffer between the southeast portion of the development area and the natural areas off -site to the east. The goal of this lake buffer is to limit the potential for large mammal access to the residential area to the west. The location of the proposed lake buffer is depicted on Appendix C. Where a lake buffer is not feasible between development and the eastern preserve area, wildlife fencing will be utilized. The fencing will be ten feet high with a three -string barbed 3 wire outrigger at the top and will be used to deter access by large mammals (Land and Lotz 1996). 6.0. EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Eastern indigo snake has not been observed on -site; however, the following plan outlines the protection guidelines that will be implemented for the Eastern indigo snake during clearing operations for the Project. The plan provides educational material and guidelines for construction personnel to follow in case they encounter an Eastern indigo snake. The plan has been prepared following the guidelines established by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for the protection of the Eastern indigo snake. The Eastern indigo snake is listed as threatened by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and the USFWS. 6.1 Biology The Eastern indigo is a large, non - poisonous, glossy black snake with smooth iridescent scales. The chin and throat maybe rusty or white - blotched. The juvenile snakes are similar to the adults, but may be lighter and exhibit a blotched dorsal pattern. Adults can grow to lengths over eight feet. The Eastern indigo might be confused with the black racer (Coluber constrictor), but the black racer exhibits a white or brown throat and is smaller and lighter in build. The Eastern indigo snake inhabits a range of habitat types including pine flatwoods and wet prairies. Individuals are wide ranging and may utilize an area of 250 acres or more. Eastern indigo snakes are known to shelter in gopher tortoise burrows. The Eastern indigo snake is diurnal (active only during the daytime) and will actively search for prey. Prey may include frogs, snakes, birds, and small mammals. Very little is known of the reproduction of this species in the wild. Breeding is believed to occur during the winter and early spring months with up to 11 large white eggs being deposited in late spring and early summer. The Eastern indigo snake is a federally threatened species and is listed by the Endangered Species Act (Act). It is unlawful for anyone to injure, harm, harass, or kill this species. Persons who knowingly violate provisions of the Act, that afford this species protection, may be subject to fine and/or imprisonment. Only the Project's qualified biologists may come in contact with or relocate an Eastern indigo snake. 6.2 Habitat Management Plan The preserve areas will be maintained per the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/ Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD ERP Application No. 100126 -5), and will provide habitat for the Eastern indigo snake. 4 Informational Posters Informational posters will be placed in a conspicuous location at the construction office and construction entrances to the Project. The poster will provide background information on identification, habits, and protection of the Eastern indigo snake. The poster will state actions to take if an Eastern indigo snake is sighted and provide the names and telephone numbers of contact persons. A copy of the informational poster will be forwarded to the USFWS for review prior to commencement of clearing activities. Informational Pamphlets Informational pamphlets will be made available to individuals in charge of the clearing operation for distribution to all construction crew. The pamphlet will provide background information on identification, habits, and protection of the Eastern indigo snake. The pamphlet will state actions to take if an Eastern indigo snake is sighted and provide the names and telephone numbers of contact persons. A copy of the informational pamphlet will be forwarded to the USFWS for review prior to commencement of clearing activities (Appendix E). Actions to take if a live or injured Eastern indigo snake is sighted during construction activity: �-. 1. Cease construction activity 2. Promptly notify the Project's biologist: Passarella & Associates, Inc. Phone: (239) 274 -0067 3. Allow the snake sufficient time to move away from construction activity before resuming construction. Actions to take if a dead Eastern indigo snake is sighted during construction activity: 1. Promptly notify the Project's biologist: Passarella & Associates, Inc. Phone: (239) 274 -0067 2. Seal the remains in an airtight plastic bag and place on ice. 3. The Project's biologist will contact the following agency personnel for proper disposal: Permitting Agent U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1339 20'h Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Phone: (772) 562 -3909 5 7.0 AMERICAN ALLIGATOR MANAGEMENT PLAN The following plan outlines the protection guidelines that will be implemented for the American alligator during and after construction of the Project. The plan identifies the procedures taken, such as the use of signage to avoid feeding or harassing of American alligators located on the property. The American alligator is listed as a species of special concern by the FWCC and threatened by similarity of appearance by the USFWS. 7.1 Biology The American alligator is a reptile with an elongated, armored, lizard -like body with a muscular flat tail. Adult alligators are dark with a pale underside while juveniles have bright yellow stripes and blotches. The average size for adults is 8.2 feet for females and 11.2 feet for males. The body weight can reach up to one -half ton. American alligators inhabit all counties in the state of Florida and are most common in the major river drainage basins and large lakes in the central and southern portions of the state. They also can be found in marshes, swamps, ponds, drainage canals, phosphate -mine settling ponds, and ditches. Alligators are tolerant of poor water - quality and occasionally inhabit brackish marshes along the coast. A few even venture into salt water. Individuals are wide ranging and some males may utilize an area of two square miles or more. Individuals ofboth sexes are most likely to become more active and extend their ranges during the April to May .-� courtship and breeding season. Prey may include frogs, snakes, birds, and small mammals, although alligators are opportunistic feeders and may prey on what is readily available. Larger individuals often prefer carrion to fresh meat. 7.2 Habitat Management Plan Extensive habitat will be provided throughout the property through wetland preservation and enhancement and the creation of lakes. The preserve areas will be maintained per the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD ERP Application No. 100126 -5). Wetlands within the preserve areas will serve as potential foraging and nesting habitats for the American alligator. 7.2.1 Educational Materials Signs will be posted on the subject property to instruct construction workers and residents not to feed or harass the American alligator. The sign will indicate that the offense is punishable by law. Informational pamphlets providing background information on identification, habits, and protection of the American alligator will be made available to homeowners and construction/maintenance personnel (Appendix F). The pamphlet states that if there is a problem with a persistent nuisance alligator, they will need to contact the FWCC, as that is the only agency empowered to handle nuisance alligators. 31 8.0 WOOD STORK AND WADING BIRD MANAGEMENT PLAN The following habitat management plan has been prepared for the purpose of addressing the conservation of potential wood stork and other wading bird habitat on the Project site. 8.1 Habitat Management Plan 8.1.1 Pre - Construction Surveys The wood storks and wading birds observed on the property were foraging. No wood stork or wading bird nests were documented on the property. Prior to construction activities, a nesting season survey will be conducted by qualified ecologists within potential nesting habitat located within the development footprint. If wood stork or other wading bird nesting activity is documented, coordination with FWCC staff will be conducted prior to clearing within the areas where the nesting activity was documented. 8.1.2 Habitat Enhancement Extensive foraging areas will be provided throughout the property through wetland preservation and enhancement. The preserve areas will be maintained per the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD ERP Application No. 100126 -5). Wetlands in each of the preserve areas will serve as potential foraging and nesting habitats for wood storks and other wading bird species. Invasive exotic removal will result in upland and wetland preserves that are more suitable as foraging habitats, as well as making the wetlands better for roosting. Supplemental plantings of native vegetation will be conducted in areas with greater than 50 percent exotics. As part of the mitigation plan, areas of highly degraded wetlands, including monocultures of melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinquenervia), will be enhanced through the mechanical removal of exotics, grading to wetland elevations, and planting with native vegetation. The grading plan for these areas includes the establishment of marshes for wood stork and wading bird foraging habitat. These marshes will be graded to varying depths to allow the concentration of prey for wading birds at alternating times of the year, as water levels seasonally rise and recede. 9.0 RED- COCKADED WOODPECKER MANAGEMENT PLAN The following habitat management plan has been prepared for the purpose of addressing the conservation of red - cockaded woodpecker habitat on the Project site. The red - cockaded woodpecker is listed as threatened by the FWCC and endangered by the USFWS. 9.1 Biology The red - cockaded woodpecker lives and breeds within old growth pine forests. The red - cockaded woodpecker forages preferentially in stands of live pines with trees that average a 7 diameter of ten inches or greater (USFWS 1985). Dense pine stands or stands primarily composed of hardwoods are avoided. Red - cockaded woodpeckers feed primarily on insects including beetles, ants, grubs, and caterpillars. A smaller percent of the diet may consist of seasonal fruits, berries, and seeds. The red - cockaded woodpecker roosts and nests in cavities excavated in live pine trees. Cavity trees are typically at least 60 to 80 years old and usually weakened by a fungal infection known as red -heart disease (McFarlane 1992, Ehrlich et al. 1988). Cavities are typically constructed on the main trunk just below the lowest branches. Numerous resin wells are maintained around the cavity entrance. The resin wells may help defend against ground- dwelling predators and insect damage. Red - cockaded woodpeckers live in family groups composed of a mated pair, offspring of the year, and unmated male helpers. The group's cavity trees are aggregated in clusters that typically occupy an area of about ten acres (USFWS 1985). Groups are highly territorial and may defend an area nearly 200 acres in size (McFarlane 1992, Ehrlich et al. 1988, USFWS 1985). Red - cockaded woodpeckers are cooperative breeders and one or more non - breeding males may assist the breeding pair in brooding, feeding, and territorial defense. Egg laying typically occurs during April, May, and June (USFWS 1985). Clutch size is typically two to five eggs (Ehrlich et al. 1988, USFWS 1985). Both sexes are involved in incubating and feeding. The time from egg laying to fledging is approximately 40 days (USFWS 1985). 9.2 Habitat Management Plan The Project's preserve areas will be managed as habitat for red - cockaded woodpeckers. In addition to the enhancement activities outlined in the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/ Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD ERP Application No. 100126 -5), the following management for the red - cockaded woodpecker habitat will be conducted. New growth or re- growth of vines and exotic vegetation will be identified and mapped. A maintenance event will be conducted following the annual inspections. New growth or re- growth of vines and exotics will be hand removed and/or treated with an approved herbicide. Thinning of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and removal of cabbage palms (Sabal palmetto) from the mid -story maybe conducted at the direction of a qualified ecologist. If burn permits can be obtained from the Department of Forestry, the preserves may be burned on a three year rotation at the direction of a prescribed burn manager. Landscape dumping is prohibited in the preserve areas. The goal of the management activities will be to maintain an open mid - story and enhance potential foraging by red - cockaded woodpeckers. 10.0 BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL MANAGEMENT PLAN The following habitat management plan has been prepared for the purpose of addressing the conservation of Big Cypress fox squirrel habitat on the Project and outlines the protection guidelines that will be implemented for the Big Cypress fox squirrel prior to, during, and after construction of the Project. The Big Cypress fox squirrel is listed as threatened by the FWCC. There is no federal listing for the Big Cypress fox squirrel in Florida. � uV 10.1 Biology The Big Cypress fox squirrel lives and breeds in varied habitats in Southwest Florida including cypress swamps, pine flatwoods, tropical hardwood forests, live oak woods, mangrove forests, and suburban habitats, including golf courses, city parks, and residential areas in native vegetation (Humphrey 1992). Dense cypress/hardwood swamps are avoided. This may be due to the competition for food and habitat with the gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis). Little data is available on the preferred forage habitat of the Big Cypress fox squirrel. Big Cypress fox squirrels prefer to feed on the male and female cones of slash pine. Cabbage palm fruits, bromeliad buds, and acorns are also important food items. A smaller percentage of the diet may consist of seasonal fruits, berries, and seeds (Humphrey 1992). Big Cypress fox squirrels often form platform nests in pines, hardwoods, and moss and stick nests in cypress (Taxodium distichum), tops of cabbage palms, and large clumps of bromeliads. Cabbage palms and bromeliads are especially important because they can provide immediate shelter, which allows the squirrel to travel over large areas without requiring a daily return to a permanent nesting facility (Humphrey 1992). Big Cypress fox squirrels are solitary animals. Interaction between animals occurs primarily during mating season. Mating chases occur frequently throughout the months of May through August. During the non - mating season, interactions are infrequent and often occur around food sources. Young remain in the nest for approximately 90 days. Home ranges are .-. 40 hectares or approximately 100 acres for males and 20 hectares or approximately 50 acres for females (Humphrey 1992). 10.2 Habitat Management Plan 10.2.1 Pre - Construction Surveys A qualified ecologist will be on -site to supervise Big Cypress fox squirrel management and monitoring activities as detailed in this plan. Prior to commencement of construction activities, the preserve areas will be staked in the field and clearly identified with orange silt fencing or an equivalent barrier. The fencing will be inspected by the preserve manager prior to clearing activities. The operation and storage of construction equipment and the stockpiling of fill and construction material will be prohibited within the fenced preserve areas. The fencing identifying the limits of the preserves will be maintained for the duration of construction activities. Also, prior to commencement of clearing activities, a survey will be conducted in areas to be cleared to identify potential Big Cypress fox squirrel nests. If potential nests are identified within the clearing limits, observations will be conducted to determine if the nests are being utilized by Big Cypress fox squirrels. The FWCC will be notified of nests determined to be utilized by Big Cypress fox squirrels. No clearing will be conducted within 125 feet of an active Big Cypress fox squirrel nest tree. After completion of nesting and observations document that juvenile squirrels have left the Z nest, a written request to remove the nest shall be made to the FWCC. After receipt of the ^ written authorization from the FWCC, the nest tree and buffer can then be cleared. 10.2.2 Habitat Enhancement The preserve areas will be enhanced and managed per the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/ Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD ERP Application No. 100126 -5), and will provide foraging and nesting habitats for Big Cypress fox squirrels. 10.2.3 Public Education A program will be established to educate homeowners and maintenance staff about Big Cypress fox squirrels. This program will include printed material and educational signage. Information on the printed material will include: • A picture and description of the Big Cypress fox squirrel and its listed status; • Notes regarding the life history and ecology of the Big Cypress fox squirrel; • Information regarding the interaction of the public with Big Cypress fox squirrels, such as the potential negative effects of feeding Big Cypress fox squirrels; and • A map showing the location of the upland and wetland preserves with a discussion of the listed status of these areas. A copy of the printed educational material shall be provided to the FWCC for review and approval prior to distribution to the homeowner's association. 10.2.4 Post - Construction Monitoring Post - construction monitoring for Big Cypress fox squirrels will be conducted as part of the wetland mitigation monitoring program for the Project. Observations of Big Cypress fox squirrel activities will be included in the wetland monitoring reports. 11.0 FLORIDA BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT PLAN The following habitat management plan has been prepared for the purpose of addressing the conservation of Florida black bear habitat on the Project site. The Florida black bear is listed as threatened by the FWCC. There is no federal listing for the Florida black bear in Florida. 11.1 Biology The Florida black bear is a solitary animal that inhabits heavily wooded terrain. They are most often found in large tracts of swamp forest and undisturbed upland forest. Some of the most important habitat types for the black bear include pine flatwoods, hardwood swamps, �—, cypress swamps, cabbage palm forests, sand pine scrub, and mixed hardwood hammocks. Denning often occurs in remote swamps or thickets with dense vegetation. Adult females breed in alternating years during the months of June and July. In Florida, hibernation may be 10 restricted to females producing cubs. Hibernation most often occurs during the winter months. The diet of black bears is highly variable and includes both plants and animals including saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), berries, honeybees, ants, armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus), feral hog (Sus scrofa), and white - tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) (Humphrey 1992). 11.2 Habitat Management Plan The preserve areas will be enhanced and managed per the Wetland Mitigation/Monitoring/ Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD ERP Application No. 100126 -5), and will serve as potential Florida black bear habitat. These preserve areas will provide connectivity to the Picayune Strand State Forest and function as a wildlife corridor. In order to deter the potential for interactions between humans and large mammals, such as the Florida black bear, a lake buffer will be constructed along the east edge of the Project's southeast residential area to deter large mammals from accessing the Project area. Fencing will be used to the north of the lake buffer along the proposed school site and along the north -south roadway. A wildlife crossing will be used where the north -south road bisects the preserve area to provide connectivity of the preserve areas. However, since the preserve area west of the roadway is surrounded by development, the wildlife crossing will be sized for reptiles, amphibians, and small to medium mammals, and will be supplemented with other methods (i.e., bars, fencing) to discourage use by large mammals. The proposed locations of the wildlife crossing and fencing are depicted on Appendix C. In addition, the Project will utilize bear proof garbage containers to discourage bears from foraging in garbage cans (Appendix G). 9.2.1 Informational Pamphlets Informational pamphlets providing background information on identification, habits, and protection of the Florida black bear will be made available to homeowners and construction/maintenance personnel (Appendix G). The pamphlet states that if there is a problem with a persistent, nuisance Florida black bear, they will need to contact the FWCC. 12.0 FLORIDA PANTHER MANAGEMENT PLAN The following habitat management plan has been prepared for the purpose of addressing the conservation of Florida panther habitat on the Project site. The Florida panther is listed as endangered by the FWCC and the USFWS. 12.1 Biology The Florida panther is a large, long- tailed cat with a great deal of color variation: pale brown or rusty upper parts; dull white or buff - colored under parts; and dark brown or blackish tail tip, back of ears, and sides of nose. Mature males have an average weight range between 100 to 150 pounds and measure nearly seven feet from nose to tip of tail. Females are 11 considerably smaller with a weight range of 50 to 100 pounds and measuring about six feet (USFWS 1987). Panthers subsist on a variety of mammalian prey dominated by white - tailed deer, feral hog, and in some areas raccoon (Procyon lotor) ( Maehr 1988a). Existing data on Florida panther reproduction indicates that breeding occurs throughout the year with a peak in the winter /spring period, a gestation period of around 90 to 95 days, litter sizes of one to four kittens, and a breeding cycle of two years for females successfully raising young to dispersal (which occurs around 18 to 24 months) (Belden 1988, Maehr 1988b). In terms of population size and occupied range, the Florida panther population is at least stable and at best expanding as evidenced by natality rates exceeding mortality rates and by recent dispersals north of the Caloosahatchee River (Land et al. 2000). According to Maehr et al. (1991), home ranges average 200 square miles for resident adult males, 75 square miles for adult females, 241 square miles for transient males, and 69 square miles for sub -adult females. Florida panthers inhabit large remote tracts of land with adequate prey and cover and occupy a variety of habitat types including hardwood hammocks, pine flatwoods, mixed hardwood swamps, and cypress swamps. Appropriate cover is an important component of habitats used, especially during hunting, denning, and day- bedding. Recent information based on global positioning system (GPS) telemetry data collected during nocturnal and diurnal periods indicate that forests are the habitats selected by panthers (Land et al. 2008). 12.2 Habitat Management Plan The preserve areas will be enhanced and managed per the Wetland Mitigation/ Monitoring/ Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD ERP Application No. 100126 -5), and will serve as potential Florida panther habitat. These preserve areas will provide connectivity to the Picayune Strand State Forest and function as a wildlife corridor. In order to deter the potential for interactions between humans and large mammals, such as the Florida panther, a lake buffer will be constructed along the east edge of the Project's southeast residential area to deter large mammals from accessing the Project area. Fencing will be used to the north of the lake buffer along the proposed school site and along the north -south roadway. A wildlife crossing will be used where the north -south road bisects the preserve area to provide connectivity of the preserve areas. However, since the preserve area west of the road is surrounded by development, the wildlife crossing will be sized for reptiles, amphibians, and small to medium mammals, and will be supplemented with other methods (i.e., bars, fencing) to discourage use by large mammals. In order to reduce the possibility of panther vehicular deaths or injury, panther crossing signs will be used to warn motorists of the potential for panthers within the development. The proposed locations of the wildlife crossing and fencing are depicted on Appendix C. 12.2.1 Informational Pamphlets Informational pamphlets (Appendix H) providing background information on identification, habits, and protection of the Florida panther will be made available to homeowners and construction/maintenance personnel. 12 13.0 REFERENCES Belden, R.C. 1988. The Florida Panther. Pages 514 -532 in W.J. Chandler (ed) Audubon Wildlife Report. 1988/1989. The National Audubon Society, New York. 817 pages. Ehrlich, Paul R. et al. 1988. The Birder's Handbook; A Field Guide to the Natural History of North American Birds. Simon & Schuster, Inc., New York, New York. 785 pages. Humphrey, Stephen R. et al. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida; Volume I. Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 392 pages. Land, E.D. and M. Lotz. 1996. Wildlife crossing designs and use by Florida panthers and other wildlife in southwest Florida. Florida Department of Transportation Report No. FL- ER -58- 96. Land, E.D., M. Lotz, D. Shindle, and S.K. Taylor. 2000. Florida panther genetic restoration and management. Annual report, Study Number 7508. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. Land E.D., D.B. Shindle, R. J. Kawula, J.F. Benson, M.A. Lotz, D.P. Onorato. 2008. Florida panther habitat selection analysis of concurrent GPS and VHF telemetry data. Journal of Wildlife Management: Volume 72, No. 3 pp. 633 -639. Maehr, D.S. 1988a. Florida Panther Movements, Social Organization and Habitat Utilization. Annual Performance Report, 7/1/87- 6/30/88, Study No. E -1 -12 II -E -2 7502, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 19 pages. Maehr, D.S. 1988b. Florida Panther Food Habits and Energetics. Annual Performance Report, 7/1/87- 6/30/88, Study No. E -1 -12 II -E -3 7503, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 4 pages. Maehr, D.S., E.D. Land, and J.C. Roof. 1991. Social Ecology of Florida Panthers. National Geographic Research & Exploration, 7(4): 414 -431. McFarlane, Robert W. 1992. A Stillness in the Pines; The Ecology of the Red - Cockaded Woodpecker. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, New York. 270 pages. 13 13.0 References (Continued) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985. Recovery Plan for the Red - Cockaded Woodpecker. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia. 88 pages. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1987. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. Prepared by the Florida Panther Interagency Committee for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia. 75 pages. 14 APPENDIX A PROJECT LOCATION MAP 77 Gulf �+'_ 'A of 01 Mexico q 4 i -- -- - - - - -- APPENDIX A. PROJECT LOCATION MAP HACIENDA LAKES NI W L' s IVAR f" C.G.R. KEV WEST PROJECT LOCATION SEC 11,12,13,14,23,24,25, TWP 50 S, RGE 26 E SEC 19,30, TWP 50 S, RGE 27 E LAUDERDALE PASSARELLA & ASSOCIATES 2 APPENDIX B AERIAL WITH LISTED WILDLIFE SPECIES LOCATIONS APPENDIX C AERIAL WITH PRESERVE AREAS AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF WILDLIFE CROSSING AND FENCING X Q L Q Q s f 11 IQ i > I, Fptj F 951 C CIMMF RCIA I'/vJ . V lnKE- � a n I All '! f ReS11)P AI nK p d .r CM yY� Ok J LEGEND Q HACIENDA LAKES PRESERVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT WATER MANAGEMENT WILDLIFE CROSSING •'•'• FENCING WETLAND OSW UPLAND TOTAL ACREAGE ACREAGE ACREAGE ACREAGE PRESERVE TOTALS 1315.44 Ac.± 5.73 Ac.± 268.80 Ac.± 1589.97 Ac.± W.C. /F.L. 010 13620 Metropolis Avenue REVIEWED BY DATE Suite 200 C.G.R. 3/2/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 REVISED DATE Phone (239) 274 -0067 P.F. 5/3/11 Fax (239) 274 -0069 ilk" N E S 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet PASSARELLA Ewlo iscF g=4 & ASSOCIATES z U 4 k' NOTES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF JANUARY 2009. SITE PLAN PER RWA, INC. DRAWING NO.0501500203PMOI.DWG DATED APRIL 29, 2011. COUNTY INFORMATION AND ROADWAY NETWORKS WERE ACQUIRED FROM THE FLORIDA GEOGRAPHIC DATA LIBRARY WEBSITE. HACIENDA LAKES O1MTT737 AERIAL WITH PRESERVE AREAS AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF WILDLIFE SHEET",,. CROSSING AND FENCING APPENDIX APPENDIX D POST - DEVELOPMENT FLUCFCS MAP OF PRESERVE AREAS o N 5 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet NOTES: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF JANUARY 2009. SITE PLAN PER RWA, INC. DRAWING NO.0501500203PMOI.DWG DATED APRIL 29, 2011. COUNTY INFORMATION AND ROADWAY NETWORKS WERE ACQUIRED FROM THE FLORIDA GEOGRAPHIC DATA LIBRARY WEBSITE. k ...A.= Q RESIDENTIAL a n D _ I Nk ti4 PARK oI j I rm n. LA DRAWN BY W.C. /F.L. REVIEWED BY C.G.R. REVLSED ^ RESIDENTIAL 3/2/101 13620 Metropolis Avenue DATE Suite 200 3/2/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 DATE I Phone (239 ) 274 -0067 LEGEND HACIENDA LAKES 310, DRY PRAIRIE 321, PALMETTO PRAIRIE 411, PINE FLATWOODS 415, PINE 426, TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK 427, LIVE OAK 428, CABBAGE PALM 434, HARDWOOD /CONIFER MIXED 514, DITCH 618, WILLOW 621, CYPRESS 624, PINE /CYPRESS 625, HYDRIC PINE 628, HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM 630, WETLAND FORESTED MIXED 631, WETLAND SHRUB 641, FRESHWATER MARSH 740, DISTURBED LAND 7401, DISTURBED LAND, HYDRIC 742, BORROW AREA 8146, UNPAVED ROAD FLUCFCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 310 DRY PRAIRIE 9.45 Ac.t 321 PALMETTO PRAIRIE 39.87 Ac.t 411 PINE FLATWOODS 179.37 Ac.t 415 PINE 23.25 Ac.t 426 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK 2.64 Ac.s 427 LIVE OAK 4.17 Ac.t 428 CABBAGE PALM 3.69 Ac.t 434 HARDWOOD /CONIFER MIXED 1.47 Ac.t 514 DITCH 0.64 Ac.t 618 WILLOW 13.45 Ac.t 621 CYPRESS 223.97 Ac.t 624 PINE /CYPRESS 882.45 Ac.t 625 HYDRIC PINE 109.99 Ac.t 628 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM 11.34 Ac.t 630 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED 18.77 Ac.t 631 WETLAND SHRUB 0.50 Ac.x 641 FRESHWATER MARSH 50.50 Ac.t 740 DISTURBED LAND 0.86 Ac.t 7401 DISTURBED LAND, HYDRIC 4.47 Ac.t 742 BORROW AREA 5.09 Ac.f 8146 UNPAVED ROAD 4.03 Ac.f TOTAL 1589.97 Ac.* HACIENDA LAKES oiMT-r737 TASSARELLA L I I AERIAL WITH POST - DEVELOPMENT SHEET N.. 6olocbls 91 ATUC U 1;TTTI- Ut- QAIAnnDnODCDDITV ADDAC APPENDIX E EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET G� W. iQ•i 1 V Qon V Q G� 2 . . V C U c� O U A O U O c� N W" . U U O 0. Q) 14, O 0 a� DNI w O O • r�•i CD 4-0 W •� L a n O i.. O Q 3 co G� W. iQ•i 1 V Qon V Q G� 2 . . V C U c� O U A O U O c� N W" . U U O 0. Q) 14, O 0 a� .. 03 ct � U � O � bA U � O � DNI w O O O L a n O i.. O ct 3 co cn CLI �N > cn ct euj u O U rc 23 •i'., b M ti O U U .0 0 It 0 vii �n '�� ,41 4 ct O p rV5i� O r C�j ct ct ai O O n oo a� .p 0 = US .. 03 ct � U � O � bA U � O � DNI w O O L a n O co o� CLI �N ct euj u O U rc 23 •i'., b M ti O ct N 3 U rc 23 •i'., O U U 0 �n '�� r ct ct ai O O oo a� .p 0 = US $-4 U,4 c, M W� � � w 4, Abp .� `j 3 op a� ° o F° r c= p �. H. H° �, a� o -M �" C U U w° O c,3 c U o `� �oMza oNaa o O > CD cn � CD CD CD 0 C-D cra CD o v c C CD cr ,. CD � o n CD CD n CD PD e- PIP, CD c, uq �' �' o CD 0- o o N C P �' CD n CD CD ol CD CD o o �: CD C CD ►� �-'�a C) cra CD ►� CD Q ° a 0 CD cra = C CD C.a-�.=s CD CD O �c uq CD -71 CD uG v o C p' P7' C (D N �' '-- • U'Q o o O BCD C Uq � CD CD 0 o � P CD a P - - p w �. CD Z o p -. - 0 a. CD cr o x 0 :: O CD CD C a �' cn p o o " CD cr CD CD `� CD n O r' CD �' �C) r' �''' o O > CD cn � a CD CD 0 o cra o v o C CD cr �CD CD � o n CD CD n CD PD e- PIP, CD c, uq �' �' o y 0- CD o CL C P �' CD n CD CD ol CD CD o C-D �: CD C CD ►� �-'�a C) cra CD ►� Q ° � 0 CD cra = C V C.a-�.=s CD CD O �c CD -71 CD p � ►-•��CD o C CD P7' C I N �' '-- • CD Er ,• CD p CD u°Q 0 o ° c a P - - p w 7 s�gx p w o 0 CD cr o CD CD O CD CD C a �' cn p o o " CD G. CD CD `� CD n O r' _ `c �' �C) r' �''' *� o C CD CD �° O o �,' P r+ O ro CD c� CD CL CD 0 CD CL CD CD CD I t o O > CD cn � CD CD 0 p v �:Y, cr �CD � o °• CD CD n CD PD o CD o uq �' CD CD o y 0- O• CL P �' CD n CD CD ol CD C-D ° cD .,� C) 0 ft ° � 0 CD = O V C.a-�.=s CD CD ~' �c o -71 CD ►-•��CD C CD C I N �' ° �� Er ,• CD p CD u°Q 0 o ° c a P - - p w 7 s�gx p w o 0 CD UQ CD � CD CD C a �' cn o o " CD G. CD CD x CD CD 0 v �:Y, cr �CD � o 0 °• Cl, ° �CD o o uq p CD CD o", �. O• P z CD n CD C-D ° cD .,� ft 0 CD V C.a-�.=s CL ~' �c o or � ►-•��CD C CD C I N �' CD CD p CD o o O u4 c a P w 7 UQ CD M CD CD CD 0 cr � o 0 °• Cl, ° CD �_ o o ° p �. o", �. O• ft 0 V C.a-�.=s �c ° � C I N �' CD N p A� O O u4 c a P w 7 CD `� CD n O r' _ `c �' n r' �''' *� o C CD CD �° O o �,' P r+ O ro �' 0 ° a• CD UQ o 0 APPENDIX F AMERICAN ALLIGATOR INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET DNI U W � l U N W ~ L M } N dt C N b C W X0000 M os o 42' a d DNI W � l U N W ~ L M } N dt N b M 03 03 U } os o 3� o 3- y; -C .V) U a U� 3 o� �o ZV �� >�;E >, w¢ o v 0 3 �• � y on a� � ova � 0 a� Z o M o� 00 ° c ° O C CD CD CD CA CA CD 0 CD C CD ¢ CD O CD n uQ UQ CD n CD E� CD ' CD p �- _ cr C O CD p N I= CD p Cn O CD CD P CD P CL Coo CD e. � o ? " 0 o vim, O �,' �, O ?' CD O CD CD `� CD - CD . O CD O O CCDD °, CD CD CD A� CD �• C b C"DD .'. 'CID p. p (D Q' p' O O � — CL O =$ CD O � � O CD O G• CD CD � N C AD �..i � � CAD p It ° + ° p n N a CD x r* c� CD CD �� Uq' y ►•d n a� 0 CD CA 0 cn O CD CD -d O 00 n 15 C ►� "• C� ems fir• ° ►-t PD O t .. CD CD O CD _-_T, (:r " `C CD O ° O O C C6 Lv D cn v� C• �,', CD ! 00 C 0. CD �• C O CD CCD 11 CD CD P n � O "t CD qWQ CD O ° CD �. • �CD � � �� m c ate O Q ': ►°� � CD cn -- -- N CD un C C ¢. CD CD � k< Q.. N x � CCD ° � CD CD PD It ° + ° p n y� x r* c� �� y ►•d n a� O A?,i'r -d CD.(7. n UQ CD ° ►-t n O n .. i O `C CD O ° O O C C6 Lv D cn v� C• �,', 00 C 0. CD �• C �_ A� CD �+ CD `y O O CD • ° � �� m c O Q ': ►°� � CAD CD C. CD N CCD PD Qn y� r* c� �� y ►•d n a� n � i 000 ° O D C v� C• �,', 00 C CD �• TQ A �, e C AD Q l 1 cC fDD APPENDIX G FLORIDA BLACK BEAR INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET c CO 0) C _0 C U) L 0 S ) U U O m L O C 0) (4 C CL I— a) O m p L 0 C O L V bft m c TL� _ o (n�c 7 m C a) QCl L T 0 >.QO E 'u -E E -0 �•> m a) Eia c ca O m Co L Q)� Y C U (>6 d m L CL �Y �L m Q m�� bft . E T "• 0 3 ca m a a� O a • p � Y O 2t: L.. O O _�_.. (n a) -0 oa w E E "0 �m°�CU EE(aa O O O C U U L 7 _ 0 m O (D 0) L Ms3rom m3ocn m O C Q m (6 C O m CU h M m -Q JZ m � O QO CO Q) Q � Al O Y C N mO �L U m N N m > V) w N N m .- Q1 CU •O O C 0- n a "0 c O T (6 CL CU O U m N LI T to cu c m E U m N C 0 N 5 U) - s m � ca ai � E > 2,E2 t vc0) a)E°a ca O 0)L T O N 0 .0 0 `m Qm c � N c E 0 0) m � 3 s w C 0� - Y (D O a w cu :F O O C L O >>, a) C� m c m E m a a) m a) OL CD CU C L.: O U— m Q N Q) -0 ami3 Ss 3 m O -O > 3 3 m a) Q N O 00 0 o ai S7 C L Y C ,a) N 7 U O > L ', tr L � C m Z3 Z3 O L 3: MUMO Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 S. Meridian Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 -1600 0 BE BEAR AWAM. Ali O a 0 E E N L C. O'0 L w c n Q- M m c as N ~ O N t6 V d O U) 'C H 0- s 0 LL C E C N O m m c > c o 0 C L 0 d V) C- w •— w d w E ` c O .LO. ca O U 0 C 3 O N G a � d � U) y C O C U m U 11 JA ta: z O_ UJof $QU Q Q68 U� J � m a3 ¢o zd LL Q 0 T m O Q) �iri(Qj a� a ai V bft 0 .— a 0 O .- (n U >> U -0 O i cu m m m 0) `+ V/ 0 bft n C 90 ca m a a� AO'i a C 0 Y > O R: c U� c 0 u0i O t; n c _C Vi m U_ y C) C_m m cu °,EcE 0 76 • p � Y O 2t: L.. O O _�_.. (n a) -0 oa w E E "0 �m°�CU EE(aa O O O C U U L 7 _ 0 m O (D 0) L Ms3rom m3ocn m O C Q m (6 C O m CU h M m -Q JZ m � O QO CO Q) Q � Al O Y C N mO �L U m N N m > V) w N N m .- Q1 CU •O O C 0- n a "0 c O T (6 CL CU O U m N LI T to cu c m E U m N C 0 N 5 U) - s m � ca ai � E > 2,E2 t vc0) a)E°a ca O 0)L T O N 0 .0 0 `m Qm c � N c E 0 0) m � 3 s w C 0� - Y (D O a w cu :F O O C L O >>, a) C� m c m E m a a) m a) OL CD CU C L.: O U— m Q N Q) -0 ami3 Ss 3 m O -O > 3 3 m a) Q N O 00 0 o ai S7 C L Y C ,a) N 7 U O > L ', tr L � C m Z3 Z3 O L 3: MUMO Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 S. Meridian Street Tallahassee, FL 32399 -1600 0 BE BEAR AWAM. Ali O a 0 E E N L C. O'0 L w c n Q- M m c as N ~ O N t6 V d O U) 'C H 0- s 0 LL C E C N O m m c > c o 0 C L 0 d V) C- w •— w d w E ` c O .LO. ca O U 0 C 3 O N G a � d � U) y C O C U m U 11 JA ta: z O_ UJof $QU Q Q68 U� J � m a3 ¢o zd LL Q O_ -0 0 Q --^ C L 70 - (O S = m W m O O CD m< W W (n O= 0 W O CD -< O W =t -0 O -O 3 O Cr CD CD a0°m mom -1< CD p> O = -a Cn ? CCD D 6 Zn � -0 3-o C m _C as s Q' (a (n pNj W C Q � CD COD ° j w�0Q?.. 00CDm = CD 3 =p0_ 0 cy ma -1 W m am O>c W CD CD < p7' in m x m 0-0 S -CD C ° m CWj CD a m'm� 3 v cD m CD = W ma � _. _W CD (D __<a_0 0. CD -0 W CD 0 (D CC- :5. Cam ? CD :5. T CD 0 = 3 Cn m Q CD W O S0.00 —.U—CoT s C 3 0 m 3� 0< 7 � N _ N = O v°i m n� � (D (n S CD 0 0 2 C2 0 m 0 3 (1 o O W C W p" ;:w SCD W C n OCCn _ CD -- 3 n �.00s(o 3 m CD CD rtm < 3-< o-3 T = o _ �m m Fn- o 61 m C) 00 moo" a <07 CD O = W C 0 - n — N -w 6 ' m zr o C 3 a (n N m cn' m 00 O CD ° —' CD O° < CD m --O O S d Cp W (D TI W 0 v 0 v 0 cn O (n 0 D 0 CD CD pO-aN — Cr 3 0 mm pmj m O_m = =r n CD m yCD O(� -CD O O _ m W yi W on • Q or CD 7L CD m < =r cn 3 = a° CL 0 m0 m N , Dayn W 0- (D D_ 0-- O C W W O' < O O m N O O m W (n — m �, N CD v COD <.(0 Q) Q CW—D 7 (Q 3 (n W N (o 070 S W ; W =m O•W 0g 3 0 (3 CD 3 Q (' CAD N fn W N N =. o o 0 N CAD (D CD 0 CD C: � `< m W �CD in-' Z3 cn (D o z o� m s� o o� m 0- m W CD —. CD to =. _ ° s 3 v o =° � m 7- �.m W o (2 m cn a m to ° = CCD CD n 5 m CD a) 'C U) W = O C O= c CD C (a m 7c <=6i =� CD m O N � O cn ZT =T W CD a W W nmi =o• m m zr Zr 3 CCD D �v o C W= n W 53 :3 (m 0 O ow CD D� N Q S zr CD CD I W �.aa3� �--aa) m - o o -°0 =Q m m - N.m CD =3 v =m3o 0 (n -0� w ET 0 0 CD W W m ZY m vWi N O• m 7 - m 7c = CD . W W 0 S 3 0 m m W< cn < 6 cz _ * aC W N TI m 0 O N o=c o v,=_ _ -CL 0 mm m 0v� 0 m m= N m m W o (nn Log 6 owlw r tc 6 6 of a W (CD O � (n = 0 m S - O C(] D ° CD O O b aro M m „z -a -nv, C) C' W 0C 3<<00 (mn 7 7 (a m • a Z 0. ty N Q O' (a O O m° M c° f d n 0 W= 3= S Q o ny y �o m o cc 3 m a? Q �� cn C a.O = x M V s M. 0 m Q m Co = t° a CD n3m 3 j N S Er P m� ^'• ^ 'arW� m � A W Cn CL O b M (D n m a �. S Cn O W (D m W (SD 0 n Ln `C O~O 2 0 0 0 Ll m 3 d 0 O W O O' 0 0 1 Z N m G N 7 CL O_ _ 00 W (D Lo rays s o a tn� CL N = m 0- �a-� (� W y o��"�m CL W (n W O, oat < ry 3 v m m H o ,o m= (npQ =C- a y n n L7 m T d 00 cn m 7 0 m D_ O CD Cn a .1C. N " ^o Q zT W M O Q M~ b O ='O- my N c� pp CDmvWO CD3w 1 0 = min } Cn N O (n (O- = m W C) a CO _S Cn O0 CD -O N m., m W W am _0 _ _ C) �. (n' CD m a-- W= CD = cD 3(n �= C O O-W 0— 3 - .. m Qm=0. mm X CD (n 0 -� S m CD ._. CD = CD 1< W Q= 00 C__ W W C_= a 0 = N W c m z (n 0 m 0 < 0 CD j (0 (D w C m 3(a TI 7 W (a CN aCD C () W W W C O Q D =� C m= cn < CAD O N mCDm3 O = m CO CD S W m W < < W m m (n 0• - W 0 00 CD Wm 0 cn it _<o oa)� () N (n (n a(o CD _ CL 6* 3 �D * O"?i cn 3 (o o c a CD c a ::r 0 = C Q CD Av S3 ff c� NO C) (n - CD N W N CD -PID 3mu' CD (1 0 CDC W W W W AQ� = O = CU QS r,jc a, 3v = n < SO CD � m o v < av �. a�a(a W C<DS (B m m W CD W cn Cn' W N CD mCD 2 'C 03. 3 CD = W o m W � Q CD CD < CD m C EH O�_. 0 cD3p W 0 W 0 a _ ° W C5D m S Cr W Co W < m -a CD C 0-W :q' 3 - 0 � CD W O- W S V .0._ =m CTZ C<D W O O EcmO W _'STIm 00— = CD a osWo (D m W = n� CL =3 CD tnCD 0 AdIkk BEAR RESISTANT TRASH & RECREATIONAL STORAGE CONTAINERS Residential Poly Carts and Cans BearProoflnc 234 S. Golden Dr. Silt, CO 81652 Ph: (970) 309 -2460 Fax: (970) 876 -0420 E -mail: Info0)BearProoflnc.com Website: htti): / /www.beari)roofinc.com/ Metal Roll Away Container 95 gallon * Metal food and trash lockers also available Bear Proofing -R -US Residential Street -side (no address available) Trash Can Ph: (865) 430 -8902 96 gallon E -mail: akruk(a)charter.net *dumpster lids, loaders, and Website: _htti): / /www.bearproofin-g-r- us.com/ bird feeders also available Bear Proof Systems, LLC Curbside Carts 7855 E. Lark Dr. 64 gallon Parker, CO 80138 94 gallon Phone: (303) 840 - 3390/1 - 800 - 944 -7973 *Also make various metal Fax: (303) 840 -3460 containers E -mail: solidws comcast.net Website: httr): / /www.bearoroofsystems.com/ BearSaver — USA Sales Bear Resistant Residential Poly Carts Steve Thompson Model PC -95 95 gallon (min order 24) Model PC -65 65 gallon (min order 20) Ph: 1- 800 - 851 -3887 Model PC -32 Fax: 909 - 605 -7780 32 gallon (min order 20) E -mail: sales(cDbearsaver.com *Commercial Yard Dumpsters also Website: htti): / /www.bearsaver.com/ available OP7 AN7,L O a 0 a- fq` groH �o�* BEAR RESISTANT TRASH & RECREATIONAL STORAGE CONTAINERS Cascade Industries The Learning Community 3400 Innovation Court SE Grand Rapids, MI 49512 -2085 Ph. (616)- 975 -4800 Fax: (616) 254 -4174 E -mail: infoa.cascadeng.com httlp://www.cascadeng.com/markets/waste/index.htm t _ ` DAWG, Inc. 25 Lassy Court Terryville, CT 06786 Phone: 1- 800 -YEL -DAWG (935 -3294) Fax: 1- 800 -LIL -PAWS (545 -7297) t__ __, I - I website: www.dawginc.com CResidential Trash Storage Containers I BearGuard Co. Ltd. P.O. Box 89 Tahoe City, CA. 96145 -0089 Phone /Fax (530) 581 -2211 E -mail: sales(ci)BearGuardlnfo.com Website: http:// www .bearguardinfo.com /index.html Carson Valley Welding 1046 Mallory Way Carson City NV. 89701 PH: (775) 884 -9353 Cell: (530) 318 -1136 Fax: (775) 884 -9354 Email: Don .nobearcan.com Website: http : / /www.nobearcan.com /index.html "Cascade Cart" 35 gallons 64 gallons 96 gallons Bear Resistant Cascade Cart 96 gallons Bearicuda Bin "Critter Can" Model Mobile Screw Top Model Mobile Bearicuda Bin BEARier Bins Green and Brown Containers Various sizes "No Bear Can" Model B -5030 $999.00 Model B -5036 $1149.00 See also the following companies: Info. above Bear Proof Inc. Bear Proofing -R -US Bear Proof Systems Awjhk WS BEAR RESISTANT TRASH & RECREATIONAL STORAGE CONTAINERS Animal Resistant Dumpsters Capital Industries, Inc. 5801 Third Avenue South Seattle WA 98108 Phone: (206) 762- 8585/1- 800 - 967 -8585 FAX: (206) 762 -5455 E -mail: sales(@capitalind.com Website: http: / /www.capitalind.com /main/ Bear Resistant Metal Containers & Lids Various designs Haul -All Equipment Systems Hyd -A -Way Model (no address available) Several options available Phone: 1- 888 - 428 -5255 for garbage disposal Fax: (403) 328 -9956 and storage E -mail: solutions(ahaulall.com Website: http: / /www.haulall.com /index.htm See also the following companies: Info. above Bear Proof Inc. Bear Proofing -R -US Bear Proof Systems BearSaver -USA Sales Recreational Storage Containers Panniers (for cooler storage) Bear -Aware Dry & Ice Panniers � (no address available) 24" Medium Dry Phone: 800 - 568 -8990 / 818 - 504 -3518 28" Large Dry Contact Jeff Berns 28" Slim Dry E -mail: 24" Medium Ice Website: http: / /www.bear- aware.com/ 28" Large Ice Outfitters Supply Pack Panniers —' 7373 US Highway 2E Columbia Falls, MT 59912 Phone: 888 - 467 -2256/ 406 - 892 -3650 Fax: 406 - 892 -4234 E -mail: gopackn(a)outfitterssupplv.com Website: http: / /www.outfitterssui)ply.com/ Pack Saddle Shop Aluminum Panniers 3071 West Twin Rd Medium Moscow Idaho 83843 Large Phone: 208 - 882 -1791 Sold with and without E -mail: support(ftacksaddleshop.com hardware Website: http://www.i)acksaddleshoo.com/Bearpan.html . BEAR RESISTANT TRASH & RECREATIONAL _ 1 � . STORAGE CONTAINERS Food Storage Lockers See the following companies: BearProoflnc BearSaver — USA Sales Haul -All Equipment Systems (product shown) Info. above Ask your local waste service provider if they offer wildlife resistant canisters. For example, Waste Pro Inc. and Waste Management Inc. have offered wildlife resistant containers for both residential and commercial locations. In some areas the Waste Service Provider has retrofitted the existing dumpster to a wildlife resistant design. All images /photos are copyright of their respective company /website. APPENDIX H FLORIDA PANTHER INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET 0 �3 .L o M iiiiiiwiiiii N � �o QL16 0 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission 620 S. Meridian Street Tallahassee, Fl 32399 -1600 MyMC.com /panther L-1 mn-tt-j i7 Printed on recycled paper. W. C O C E , E pox .p ° ti o 0 -d ° c O d> 8dm �xo N p T A F' N d ^ A a0�ya a° —°E6 m ° ° o o m aro ow � O. O ,b N w U b d d C w ate+ lA EA w a, %st R+ E w T d m� 0. M > YK E N .0 3 �7y d as 'tid l;�x �> mm� wc7 �b,o d r0 11 7 r% o ca � mr cjx d t. d U C Y o d ll� O aQ 0 C d O y N a •"� bo m •� P > 0 M O A � it x O p 0 A � q k .X b �.0 O p m b d O N F x' Fi OD CE a�imd oG a�imc. a ^dm ao > ,°, o .G o F m w d d F'O.4yy ybo'� °�v U C s O b C C> ,x �! ,, o a Y -0 yd c. C o bU of A G 0 '> V 0— >°, C4 d >+ �i Q•� Y °jy aUa V Li .y C IL E 0 O .0. v 0 T y o � u 3 O aro ro and ea �ro ,] y 'y .010 � o d� �o O M CL a a e r a Z M m w 7 a. L Q C C) — rL 9 a e ' w Y � O a a a a - -' o E `o o my C o m v � C ® m � ® e = a0 N N M U U 3 LL �t 0 ct ao 00 00 !-i m a+ O x C d y o m ° "1 cs d N O O ID ID tC X. Y O U 0 >. CacO+oma�'i ^s� ° • � > E! 7�•,^ .0 c QA �a m� b q O.0 °aa ❑.� amF • a W?:5 T d m� 0. M > YK E N .0 3 �7y d as 'tid l;�x �> mm� wc7 �b,o d r0 11 7 r% o ca � mr cjx d t. d U C Y o d ll� O aQ 0 C d O y N a •"� bo m •� P > 0 M O A � it x O p 0 A � q k .X b �.0 O p m b d O N F x' Fi OD CE a�imd oG a�imc. a ^dm ao > ,°, o .G o F m w d d F'O.4yy ybo'� °�v U C s O b C C> ,x �! ,, o a Y -0 yd c. C o bU of A G 0 '> V 0— >°, C4 d >+ �i Q•� Y °jy aUa V Li .y C IL E 0 O .0. v 0 T y o � u 3 O aro ro and ea �ro ,] y 'y .010 � o d� �o O M CL a a e r a Z M m w 7 a. L Q C C) — rL 9 a e ' w Y � O a a a a - -' o E `o o my C o m v � C ® m � ® e = a0 N N M U U 3 LL �t 0 ct ao 00 00 !-i m a+ O x �b 7 F mb, �w a�a o a. 3ta �A. a, a� Da 0 a• b m O nip � A o K m�Mma.m�o w m RIO, 5' `�° K ro m n� � y m o gp.�Gm 50 am�P�-tim ov m � m y� "oom y O S. R m R amoCRa m m a w a K O m T o'm`�m °ymb V y< m m o m v c �.m.mwmtye ;;•< m m p'�mo m H N Cto f9v m A m m v G " a m ? m � C . 7 p„OOG `t tD Op m8�'m 7c'SKm PD o m m M �7 ro `G m O 51 O G m a K° O d� 01 m y� N m •■ ?; a r .P m 'C\ »�� o< O w n m R s m G. ° n ° m C "m'� »Om "�'y <�. r•°.n�'O m ° m mR O-m cr O `C oc m m m m m n m tD VDro K° co ,7 E mom m p' m m 7c' m° as M m oy m» ro M ❑ m•° �! aq ID c<D I y m A m CL CD o�� mmie xry m A� ��yy.m S. "f m d m Mon M p r ro m w o a m rob ID o 0 o m m m o m ID G n' fD m .s m m O. m m o o �•° C m SL 0 wm, m .y ~rm�j m Cq K m m M^ tj K m O a m CD P' �' do .ti y m` em.. m (yD 7..- m o m M o p 9 g l7m n. m ro< m P. `G� m n m o^ 0 m �•m c~COD cn m »� m m�� mID m o ° � Da'£ m �'m °, m K � m � m � o� m o �ro c E.� mo � CD ny tv co� m w O. m C � O m' y mm WV31 N3H1NVd DMd y z Ci"I ^ Fl `n o A. omroc�Ca.3 °' 2 »imam C T1 -n � 9 C �. A ro �m'�..��m'�ao y, p a 30 y �x �xx ox a'o �m Sao r°c m Dpi o O. m 3 m TJ p•K Q, c °» p m o �.m .�E Om 3 a AC fD m• op °•7a »m•- o. �m 0..°,m N m� m � 7 � Cs y ymm Km �*'m �.o �• M D. m C (D N \ Q m mAK] p W own �,m Q y mm m oa CC U' tv O w °• �1 fpm m ,0 0 o m �• e 0, m m fD (D Z CD N n y 7 m c.S, m W mm tr' B C m W 77 :s m Y I'D Al I m A CD A mm fmD mm F. n p m DC Florida Panther Safet y Tips Encounters with Florida panthers are rare. But if you live, work or recreate in panther habitat, there are things you can do to enhance your safety and that of friends and family. 4k Be Alert From Dusk 'Til Dawn When it comes to personal safety, always be aware of your surroundings. Florida panthers are most active at night. Exercise more caution at dawn, dusk and during the night. fit Landscape For Safety Remove vegetation that provides cover for panthers. Remove plants that attract wildlife (especially deer). By attracting them, you naturally attract their predator — the panther. IPjR Keep Panther Prey Away Deer, raccoons and wild hogs are prey for the Florida panther. By feeding deer or other wildlife, you may inadvertently attract panthers. Wildlife food such as unsecured garbage, pet foods and vegetable gardens also may attract prey. IPjr Keep Pets Safe And Secure Roaming pets are easy prey for predators including panthers. Supervise pets and then bring them inside or keep them in a comfortable, secure and covered ken- nel. Feeding pets outside also may attract raccoons and other panther prey. wo; Keep Livestock Secure Where practical, keep chickens, goats, hogs or other livestock in enclosed sheds or barns at night. Opl Supervise Children Keep children close to you, especially outdoors between dusk and dawn. Educate them about panthers and other wildlife they might encounter. Voi Never Approach A Panther Most panthers want to avoid humans. Give a panther the time and space to steer clear of you. "s Hike With A Friend Always hike, backpack and camp when in wild areas with a companion. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Park Service 1- 888 - 404 -3922 OW MyFWC.com /panther If You Encounter A Panther: Make yourself appear larger, open your jacket, raise your arms, throw stones, branches, etc., without turning away. Wave raised arms slowly, and speak slowly, firmly, loudly to communicate that you are not prey and may actually be a danger to it. Avoid crouching or bending over. Squatting or bending over makes you look smaller, resembling a prey -sized animal. Do not run. Running may stimulate a panther's instinct to chase. Stand and face the animal. Make eye contact. Give the panther space. Most Florida panthers will avoid a confrontation. Give them a way to escape. If attacked, fight back with whatever is at hand (without turning your back). While there has never been a reported panther attack in Florida, in western states, potential victims have fought back successfully with rocks, sticks, caps, jackets, garden tools and even their bare hands. Since large cats usually try to bite the head or neck, try to remain standing and face the animal. If you feel threatened by a panther or have lost pets or livestock to a panther, please call the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission at 1- 888 - 404 -3922. F \SH AND P D(MISER-VIJEt- Z O ® O 9 bqr /ON GOB MyFWC.com /panther EXHIBIT 28 USFWS COMMENT LETTER DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2010 S�g}tTOP ly United States Department of the Interior a FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE South Florida Ecological Services Office �q%tCH 3 1$�� 1339 20'h Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 November 2, 2010 Tunis W. McElwain U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Fort Myers Regulatory Office 1520 Royal Palm Square Boulevard, Suite 310 Fort Myers, Florida 33919 Service Conservation Planning Activity Code: Service Federal Activity Code: Service Consultation Code: Corps Application Number: Date Received: Applicant: Project: County: (due. �HICRV t(.'EWII.n[.IFE 41420 -2010- CPA -0424 41420 - 2006 -FA -0540 41420- 2006 -F -0204 SAJ- 2003 -11158 (IP -SMB) June 16, 2010 Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Hacienda Lakes Collier Dear Mr. McElwain: The Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) letter to the Service dated June 16, 2010, and Biological Assessment (BA) prepared by Passarella and Associates, Incorporated (PAI) dated June 2010. The Service previously reviewed and provided comments to the Corps on April 11, 2006, for a similar project referenced as Toll- Rattlesnake, LLC. The Service's 2006 comments, the Corps' 2006 application and 2006 BA prepared by PAI, were also reviewed. Our comments are provided under the provisions of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1958, as amended (48 Stat. 401; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The original 2006 application proposed to fill and excavate 581.88 acres of wetlands and 280.60 acres of uplands in the development of a mixed -use residential community with a commercial center, golf course, club house, and other ancillary facilities. The 2006 application also proposed the preservation and restoration of 1,167.58 acres of adjacent wetlands and 209.53 acres of adjacent uplands. The project area totaled 2,239.59 acres with a development footprint of 862.48 acres and a preservation footprint of 1,377.11 acres. The 2010 application proposes to fill and excavate 474.77 acres of wetlands and 237.8 acres of uplands in the development of a mixed -use residential community with a commercial center, golf course, club house, and other ancillary facilities. The 2010 application proposes the preservation 4 � y Tunis W. McElwain Page 2 and restoration of 1,290.08 acres of adjacent wetlands and 258.91 acres of adjacent uplands. The project area totaled 2,262.14 acres with a development footprint of 712.58 acres and a preservation footprint of 1,548.99 acres. The 2010 project development footprint has been reduced by 149.9 acres with a corresponding increase in preservation lands of 172.45 acres. According to the Public Notice, the preservation lands, which are mostly contiguous with the neighboring Picayune Strand State Forest (PSSF), will be placed under a conservation easement granted to the South Florida Water Management District (District) or conveyed fee simple to the State of Florida to be incorporated as part of the PSSF. Project wetlands include forested, shrub, and herbaceous freshwater wetlands with varying degrees of infestation by melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinqunervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). Project uplands include pine flatwoods and palmetto prairie, also with varying degrees of infestation by melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. The Hacienda Lakes project site is located in Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, and 25; Township 50 South; Range 26 East and Sections 19 and 30; Township 50 South; Range 27 East; Collier County, Florida. The project site generally lies along the east side of County Road (CR) 951 (Collier Boulevard) extending one and a half miles to the east at its northern end and extending three miles to the east at its southern end. Approximately two - thirds of the property Iies north of Sabal Palm Road and one -third south of Sabal Palm Road. The Willow Run Quarry is along the northern property boundary, and scattered single - family residences and the Winding Cypress Development are along the southern property boundary. The PSSF, including Picayune Strand Restoration Project is to the east. The Florida Sports Park and Collier County Sheriffs Junior Deputy Facility are located in the central portion of the property at the eastern end of the extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. An existing farm field is located north of Sabal Palm Road on the eastern portion of the property. The remaining portions of the site are undeveloped lands. A 45 -acre outparcel owned by the state is located within the eastern portion of the property. Portions of the project are within the Collier County Urban Residential Fringe Sub - District (zero to one mile east of CR 951), the Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District Sending Lands (over one mile east of CR 951), and a designated activity center at the intersection of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES The Service has reviewed the project Biological Assessment and other information available, including our Geographic Information System (GIS) database, for recorded locations of federally listed threatened and endangered species, and critical habitats on or adjacent to the project area. The GIS database is a compilation of data received from several sources. The Service also conducted a site inspection on August 18, 2010. There is no critical habitat located on or adjacent to the project site, therefore none will be affected. On August 18, 2010, the Service met on site with PAI, Corps, and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation (FWC) to review site conditions. The Service also coordinated a later office meeting with representatives from the Service; Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge; Corps; • Tunis W. McElwain Page 3 PAI; Lewis, Longman, and Walker, P.A.; and Hacienda Lakes, LLC to discuss project details. In addition to information provided in the Corps Public Notice and 2010 BA prepared by PAI, we have also reviewed results from additional listed species surveys performed by PAI in 2006 and 2007. Eastern indigo snake Suitable habitat for the threatened eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) includes a mosaic of habitats, including the project area, in which they establish home ranges of up to 183 acres on average, for males, and up to 120 acres for females. Eastern indigo snakes appear to be associated with burrows excavated by other animals, as well as naturally occurring cavities. In the sandy central ridge of south Florida, eastern indigo snakes use gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) burrows more (62 percent) than other underground refugia (Layne and Steiner 1996). A gopher tortoise burrow was identified during site surveys in 2006 by PAT in the northeast portion of the site proposed for conservation. Additional burrows were identified during site surveys in 2010 by PAI on and adjacent to the 45 -acre state -owned outpareel in the central portion of the site proposed for conservation. The Corps determined this project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" the eastern indigo snake, as any permit issued will be conditioned such that the applicant will adhere to the Service's draft Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake (Service 2004a) during project activities. Therefore, the Service concurs with this determination. Wood stork The Corps determined this project "may affect" the endangered wood stork (Mycteria americana). The Service has identified an 18.6 -mile core foraging area around all known wood stork colonies that is important for reproductive success. Information on the Service's GIS database indicates the presence of four historic wood stork colonies within 18.6 miles of the project area. These historic colonies are located 16.5 miles and 17.7 miles north; and 16.5 miles and 17.3 miles northeast of the project site. The wood stork typically utilizes freshwater marshes, ponds, ditches, tidal creeks and pools, impoundments, pine /cypress depressions and swamp sloughs for foraging. They forage most effectively in shallow -water areas with highly concentrated prey, such as wetland depressions subject to seasonal drying. To effectively ascertain the effect of project construction on the wood stork, we must evaluate wetland suitability for wood stork utilization onsite in terms of foraging potential. The project would permanently impact 474.77 acres of onsite wetlands, of which 459.48 are short hydroperiod wetlands and 15.26 acres are long hydroperiod wetlands. These wetlands include a mixture of acreages of cypress (Taxodium sp.) sloughs and pine (Pinus elloitti) flatwoods. Tunis W. McElwain Page 4 According to species observation maps provided by PAI on February 14, 2007, there were 11 locations of wood stork observations throughout the Hacienda Lakes property. Four of these observations were located in the proposed footprint of development. The 2010 BA species observation maps note the presences of two occurrences of wood storks, both within proposed conservation areas. Based on the above assessment and the information in the 2010 BA, the Service concurs with the Corps determination of "may affect" for the wood stork. In order for the Service to initiate formal consultation in accordance with 50 CFR 402.14, in addition to the information provided in the 2010 BA, we also need the following information. Wetland Mitigation Plan The applicant proposes to implement a wetland mitigation plan for the project. The wetland mitigation plan includes 1,287.32 acres of wetland enhancements, restoration, and preservation. The conservation areas will be deeded to the state and /or placed under a conservation easement to the District and the Corps. Wetland enhancement consists of enhancing and preserving 854.38 acres of wetlands through hand removal of exotic and nuisance species, 369.76 acres of wetlands through hand removal of exotics and supplemental planting of native wetland vegetation, and 63.18 acres of wetlands through the mechanical removal of exotics, grading and re- planting. Mechanical removal of exotics will occur in wetlands that currently have greater than 75 percent coverage by exotic species. These areas will be enhanced through the mechanical removal of exotics, grading to wetland elevations, and planting with native vegetation. Although the applicant has proposed habitat restoration and preservation of wetlands for compensation from wetland losses, insufficient information has been provided on the restoration, long -term management, and long -term cost of management of the restored wetlands. Please provide a land management plan that details the restoration, long -term management, and cost associated with the long -term management of the restored lands. Also include in the plan the funding mechanism proposed that will generate funds needed for the long -term management. The Service suggests the applicant establish through a deposit of funds, a non - wasting account: for example a land trust. The endowment should be held by an experienced, responsible entity. The Service recommends using a trust agreement similar to the template agreement for conservation banks. Wood Stork Foraging Assessment To assess the existing wood stork foraging habitat onsite and the proposed habitat compensation plan, a wood stork foraging habitat assessment was conducted by the applicant. The assessment Tunis W. McElwain Page 5 follows the methodology established by the Service, and described in detail in Enclosure 3 in the Service's May 18, 2010, Wood Stork Key (Key) available at: http: / /www. fws. gov /verobeachlimages /pdfLibrary /201005 l 8_letter _Service %20to %20Corps_FL % 20Programmatic %o20Stork %20revised l .pdf The analysis estimates the potential loss of fish biomass available as forage to wood storks resulting from unavoidable wetland impacts due to the proposed project. The analysis also estimates the potential increase of fish biomass available as forage to wood storks that will occur as a result of the proposed wetland mitigation activities on the project. Based on the wood stork foraging habitat assessment conducted for the project, unavoidable wetland impacts from development activities will result in the loss of 137.34 kilograms of fish biomass potentially vulnerable to predation by wood storks. The proposed wetland mitigation will result in an increase of 392.00 kilograms of fish biomass, thus providing a net increase on the project site of 254.66 kilograms of fish biomass. In addition, the Service also evaluates biomass contribution from crayfish as a component of the foraging base for wood storks. Please provide a comparable biomass analysis incorporating crayfish biomass as additive values to Table 9 in the Key. To facilitate this assessment, please replace the values referenced in Table 9 with those values referenced in Table 14 in the South Fort Meade Mine Biological Opinion (BO), dated May 28, 2010, available at: http: / /www.fws. gov/ verobeach /imagesibiologicalopinion/ 20100528 _letter_Service %20to %20Co rps_BO %20FA 1006% 20South% 20Fort%20Meade %20Mine %20052810.pdf The values in Table 14 are also provided below. Table 14. Wood stork suitable prey base (fish and crayfish biomass per hydroperiod). H dro eriod class Fish biomass Crayfish biomass Total biomass Class 1 0.26 gram/m' 0.05 gram/m' 0.31 gram/m' Class 2 0.52 gram/ml 0.10 gram/m 0.62 gram/m" Class 3 1.19 grams /m 0.13 ram/m- 1.32 grams/m2 Class 4 2.18 gram /rnz 0.15 grams/m' 2.34 rams /m Class 5 2.70 grams/m' 0.23 grams/m' 2.93 gram /m Class 6 3.12 grams/m" 0.24 gram/mz 3.36 gram/m' Class 7 3.38 rams /m 0.25 gram/m 3.63 gram/m' The applicant is encouraged to request a copy of the wood stork foraging analysis calculator (Microsoft® Office Excel spreadsheet), which will facilitate their wood stork forging calculations. Please include all data necessary to replicate the analysis. Tunis W. McElwain The following information should be included for each unique wetland /surface water area: a. Hydroperiod; b. Wetland class; c. Habitat type; d. Acreage; e. Percent exotic vegetation cover; and f. Details on whether the area is proposed for impacts or preservation. Red - cockaded woodpecker The Corps determined this project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" the endangered red - cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (Picoides borealis). Page 6 RCWs utilize southern slash pine (Pinus ellioti var. densa) flatwoods as nesting and foraging habitat in south Florida (Beever and Dryden 1992). Colony sites are 5 to 10 acres in size. Home ranges average 350 to 400 acres in southern Florida, but can exceed 500 acres in southwest Florida. According to Florida Land Use, Land Cover Classification System codes (FLUCCS), the project site includes approximately 1,355 acres of land cover types that include pine in the canopy and a substantial portion of the 474.74 acres of wetlands to be impacted (and an unknown portion of uplands to be impacted) also support slash pines. RCWs occasionally forage on cypress and will forage in exotic - invaded habitats, including those cypress and hydric pine areas dominated by melaleuca (Dryden 2010). PAT performed cavity tree and foraging surveys during the non - nesting season (2003 and updated in 2009) and nesting season (2004 and updated in 2009) in accordance with the Service's RCW- specific Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species (Service 2004b). Two cavity trees were documented in the eastern half of the south - central portion of the property in an area designated for conservation. As no RCWs were observed utilizing the cavity trees during surveys and normally associated resin wells were noted absent, the applicant believes these cavities to be abandoned. The Service's GIS database shows "abandoned" RCW cluster activity in this area as well. One RCW was observed by PAI on May 26, 2004, during the nesting season survey in the northeastern portion of the property proposed as a conservation area. No other RCWs were heard or observed during RCW - specific surveys or during other site work. Our database also shows several other locations of historic RCW activity about one -half mile west of the property and several locations of historic activity about one -half mile east of the property. The westerly locations are west of CR 951 and were characterized as "inactive" by the FWC in 1990. The easterly locations are characterized as "abandoned" by the Florida Natural Areas Inventory and are in proximity to several large areas proposed for conservation within the property. Tunis W. McElwain Page 7 The Florida Division of Forestry is actively managing recovery of RCWs within their boundaries. In order to maintain existing RCW forage habitat on the project site, long -term habitat management, particularly prescribed fire and exotic control; will be necessary in proposed conservation areas. Perpetual inclusion in the PSSF under the Florida Division of Forestry management is the preferred method of site management for RCWs. In consideration of the above information, and with further detail associated with the draft proposal of restoration of perpetual wetland (cypress), upland and hydric pine conservation areas within project conservation areas, the Service concurs with the Corps determination of "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" the RCW. If on -site preserves are not proposed to be managed by FDOF in perpetuity, additional effects may be incurred in RCW forage habitat which shood be coordinated with the Service. Florida panther The Corps determined this project "may affect" the endangered Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). The project site is within the current range of panthers and contains habitat suitable for utilization by panthers and panther prey species. White - tailed deer and feral hog, both panther prey species, have been observed on the site during fieldwork conducted for the project. The project site is located within the Service's Panther Focus Area and within the Florida panther Primary Zone as defined in the report How Much Is Enough? Landscape -scale Conservation for the Florida Panther (Kautz et al. 2006). The project site is also located in Priority 1 panther habitat as designated in the Florida Panther Habitat Protection Plan (Logan et al. 1993). Additionally, the adjacent PSSF includes approximately 55,560 acres of conservation lands for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan that benefit the panther. The Florida panther was federally listed as endangered in 1967 (32 FR 4001). The present occupied range of the panther in south Florida represents about 1 percent of its historic range in the southeastern United States. Panther home ranges average from 60 to 187 square miles. They frequent large areas of undeveloped forested habitats, but use areas comprised of other vegetative cover as well. Cover, water, and adequate prey are required to sustain panthers. The project includes approximately 1,568 acres of disturbed palmetto prairie, pine flatwoods, live oak, mixed hardwood /conifer, hydric pine, pine - cypress, cypress, hardwood swamp, freshwater marsh, and open agricultural land with varying degrees of exotic infestation. During the field survey conducted on August 18, 2010, concurrent telemetry over flights documented Florida Panther (FP) 148 onsite. FP 148 is a female that gave birth to 3 kittens in April 2010. During fieldwork in 2009, Florida panther signs were also documented onsite. Florida panther tracks were identified on Sabal Palm Road leading south onto the project site, on a dirt trail on the east side of the project site (east of the Sports Park), on a trail east of Willow Run Quarry, and south of the citrus grove located on Sabal Palm Road. A Florida panther scrape /scratch was identified in pine - cypress habitat about one -half mile south of Sabal Palm Road. A total of 1,092 telemetry locations have been documented within 5 miles of the project from 1989 to 2009. These points are from a total of 13 Florida panthers and 3 Texas cougars. Over 75 percent of the telemetry locations within the 5- mile radius of the project are recorded from Tunis W. McElwain Page 8 seven collared cats: FP 44, FP 146, FP 147, FP 148, FP 158, and Texas Cougar (TX) 104 and TX 106. A total of 87 radio - collared telemetry points from eight Florida panthers (numbers 30, 44, 60, 92, 146, 147,148, and 156) and two Texas cougars (numbers 104 and 106) have been recorded on the project site between 1989 and 2010. Within the past 6 years of available data (2004 - 2010), telemetry from four Florida panthers (FP 146, FP 147, FP 148, and FP 156) has been recorded on the project site. Telemetry for FP 146 was recorded on the project site between March 2006 and June 2008. FP 146 is a male that has a use area including the Picayune Strand State Forest. In the FWC's September 2009 annual report on panthers (FWC 2009), it was reported that FP 146's telemetry collar malfunctioned, was released, and later recovered by the FWC. Telemetry for FP 147 was recorded on the project site between September 2006 and August 2007. FP 147 is a male that has a use area including the Big Cypress National Preserve south of 1 -75, Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, Picayune Strand State Forest, and Rookery Bay National Estuarine Reserve. In the FWC's September 2009 annual report on panthers (FWC 2009), it was reported that FP 147's telemetry collar either failed or was released via timed or remote release mechanisms. Telemetry for FP 148 was recorded on the project site between March 2006 and February 2007 and in August 2010. FP 148 is a female that has a use area including the Picayune Strand State Forest. In the FWC's September 2009 annual report on panthers (FWC 2009), it was reported that FP 148's telemetry collar either failed or was released via timed or remote release mechanisms. FP 148's telemetry collar was replaced in 2010 (Land 2010). Telemetry for FP 156 was recorded on the project site between December 2007 and June 2008. FP 156 is a male that has a use area including the Picayune Strand State Forest and North Belle Meade. In the FWC's September 2009 annual report on panthers (FWC 2009), it was reported that FP 156's telemetry collar either failed or was released via timed or remote release mechanisms. The Service concurs with the Corps' effect determination for the Florida panther. In order to effectively ascertain the effect of this project on the panther and in order for the Service to initiate formal consultation in accordance with 50 CFR 402.14, in addition to the reports provided in the 2010 BA, we need the following information: Project Effects and Project Conservation Measures: 1. An estimate of the increase in traffic, on specific roadways in the vicinity of the project that will result (a) during project construction and (b) at full project occupancy. Please provide a description of the evaluation and methodology used to provide the estimates. These estimates should include: a. Existing average trips per day, averaged over a week for the existing travel routes to and from the project, with emphasis on those roads in the Panther Focus Area; Tunis W. McElwain Page 9 b. The projected with project increase in average trips per day caused by the project, averaged over a week for the existing travel routes to and from the project area, with emphasis on those roads in the Panther Focus Area; c. The projected with project increase expected from non - project - related traffic increases in average trips per day, averaged over a week for the existing travel routes in the project area, with emphasis to those roads in the Panther Focus Area; and d. A figure illustrating the projected with project change in percent distribution of two -way project traffic on the affected roads resulting from project buildout. Specific major roadways should include CR 951, U.S. 41, and I -75. Information provided in project reviews by the District, dated May 7, 2010, reference proposed improvements to Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Sabal Palm Road, Lord's Way Road, and the proposed extension of Benfield Road. Please include these roadways in the traffic assessment and respond to road issues as indicated in the Service's letter dated May 8, 2009, to Collier County Transportation Service Department (enclosure). Based on historical records, there have been three vehicular collisions involving panthers documented along CR 951 in the vicinity of the proposed project. 2. A full panther habitat analysis with all supporting data needed to replicate the analysis, including (a) acres of each habitat by FLUCCS, (b) amount of exotic vegetation present for each habitat type, (c) existing and proposed cover type by acreage, (d) PHU calculations for existing and proposed cover types, and (e) PHU calculations for any proposed compensation areas. Since the original Corps application, our land cover values have been revised to better reflect the relative importance of the different land cover types to the panther. Please use these new values that are referenced in the Picayune Strand Restoration BO, dated March 12, 2009, and available at: http: / /www.fws.gov /verobeach/ images/ biologicalopinion /20090312_1etter_Service %20to %2 OCorps_PSRP %20BO.pdf. The applicant proposes to implement a panther preserve conservation plan for the project. The preserve conservation plan includes 1,548.99 acres, consisting of 1,290.08 acres of wetlands and 258.91 acres of uplands. Exotic species will be removed from the preserve lands and the lands will be managed in perpetuity for the benefit of the Florida panther. The conservation areas will be deeded to the state and/or placed under a conservation easement to the District and the Corps. As discussed above for preservation and mitigation lands associated with adverse effects to wood storks and loss of wetlands, insufficient information has been provided on the restoration, long -term management, and long -term cost of management of the restored wetlands. Please provide a land management plan that details the restoration, long -term management, and cost associated with the long -term management of the restored lands. Also include in the plan the funding mechanism proposed that will generate funds needed for the long -term management. The Service suggests the applicant establish through a deposit of funds, a non - wasting account, for example a land trust. The Tunis W. McElwain Page 10 endowment should be held by an experienced, responsible entity. The Service recominends using a trust agreement similar to the template agreement for conservation banks. 4. In our evaluation of the information provided in the Corps 2010 Public Notice and the 2010 BA, we noted portions of the development (houses), specifically referenced as sheets 28, 29, 32, 40, and 43 of 55 in the Public Notice, to directly border proposed panther preservation lands. Based on species survey data, panthers are present in the project area and the potential for human/panther interactions is a significant concern to the Service. Please provide an assessment of proposed actions that would minimize the likelihood of this adverse effect. Consider the use of barrier fencing (minimum of 10 -foot) and border lakes as potential deterrents to human/panther interactions. 5. We also noted in our review of the residential housing footprint (specifically sheet 40 of 55), a proposed east finger of residential houses (14 lots) protruding into bordering preserve lands. We believe this layout has significant potential for human/panther interactions and significant adverse effects to management of and functionally of the adjacent proposed preserves. We suggest a revised plan that minimize these adverse effects. 6. We also noted in our review of the submitted documents (referenced as sheets 33 and 44 of 55), that the applicant is proposing to relocate the existing Florida Sports Park and Collier County Sheriffs Junior Deputy Facility to a location east of the Collier County Urban Residential Fringe Sub - District (zero to 1 mile east of CR 95 1) and immediately south of the 45 -acre state owned lands. The applicant is also proposing the construction of a lake immediately west of these state lands. FLUCCS classifications for the proposed relocations and lake are primarily pine /cypress (625 and 624 codes) and pine flatwoods (411 codes), with exotic intensities between 0 and 75 percent. These facilities are also bordered by preserve lands. We believe this layout has significant potential for human/panther interactions and significant adverse effects to management of and functionally of the adjacent proposed preserves. We also consider the proposed impacts to the affected wetlands to not be in accordance with the Clean Water Act section 404(b)(1) Guidelines and the Service's Mitigation Policy as referenced below. We suggest a revised plan that minimize these adverse effects. FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES Wetlands in southwest Florida are ecologically important areas supporting a myriad of fish and wildlife. They provide nesting, resting, and feeding sites for a variety of wading and migratory bird species. Many species of reptiles and amphibians use wetlands during certain stages of their life cycle or throughout their entire lives. Wetlands onsite are considered by the Service to be valuable in terms of fish and wildlife habitat and food chain support, pollutant filtration, and groundwater recharge. As headwater wetlands for Rookery Bay, the receiving waterbody, project area wetlands provide water quality benefits and attenuate freshwater delivery to the estuary. Tunis W. McElwain Page 11 Hacienda Lakes, LLC proposes to fill and excavate 474.77 acres of wetlands and 237.81 acres of uplands in their mixed -use development. Wetlands include forested, shrub, and herbaceous freshwater wetlands with varying degrees of infestation by melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. As compensatory mitigation for wetland impacts, the applicant proposes to preserve and eradicate exotic and nuisance vegetation on 1,290.08 acres of adjacent wetlands and 258.91 acres of adjacent uplands, which would be mostly contiguous with the neighboring Picayune Strand State Forest. In accordance with the Clean Water Act section 404(b)(1) Guidelines and the Service's Mitigation Policy, Hacienda Lakes must demonstrate that wetland impacts onsite have been avoided and minimized to the extent practicable. Please provide information addressing this precursor to compensation and, in order for the Service to then evaluate compensatory mitigation, we request details of a pre- and post- project wetland functional assessment for (1) wetlands to be impacted and (2) wetlands to be preserved and enhanced. Reasonable assurance should be provided that this project will not reduce natural flows through the watershed and to the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve or negatively affect water quality in Rookery Bay. Additionally, the Belle Meade project area is identified in the Southwest Florida Feasibility Study (now proposed as a Comprehensive Watershed Master Plan) draft functional groups as an important fish and wildlife resource area. General Comments We recommend further limiting the easterly extent of project development into panther Primary Zone habitat and the Belle Meade watershed. Effort should be directed towards constraining development to the Collier County Urban Residential Fringe Sub - District as illustrated in Exhibit 28 of the 2010 BA, and avoiding intrusion into the designated RF- Sending area. Thank you for your cooperation and effort in protecting the natural resources of southwest Florida. If you have any questions, please contact Allen Webb at 772 -562 -3909, extension 246. zinc rely yours, Pa 1 ouza Fie Supervisor South Florida Ecological Services Office Enclosure Tunis W. McElwain Page 12 cc: w /enclosure (electronic copy only) Corps, Fort Myers, Florida (Susan Blass) District, Fort Myers, Florida (John Policarpo) EPA, West Palm Beach, Florida (Veronica Fasselt) FDOF, Naples, Florida (Greg Ihle) FDOF, Ft. Myers, Florida (Kevin Podkowka, Hank Graham) FWC, Vero Beach, Florida (Joe Walsh) FWC, Naples, Florida (Darrell Land) Service, Naples, Florida (Kim Dryden) Service, Florida Panther NWR, Naples, Florida (Ben Nottingham) Tunis W. McElwain Page 13 LITERATURE CITED Beever, J.W. III and K.A. Dryden: 1992. Red - cockaded woodpeckers and hydric slash pine flatwoods. Trans. 57th N.A. Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference. Dryden, K. 2010. Personal communication. Biologist. August 18, 2010, meeting notes. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Naples, Florida Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2009. Annual report on the research and management of Florida panthers: 2008 -2009. Fish and Wildlife Research Institute and Division of Habitat and Species Conservation, Naples, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, and K. Root. 2006. How Much Is Enough? Landscape -scale Conservation for the Florida Panther. Biological Conservation. Land, D. 2010. Personal communication. Biologist. E -mail to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service dated August 26, 2010. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; Tallahassee, Florida. Layne, J.N. and T.M. Steiner. 1996. Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corals couperi): summary of research conducted on Archbold Biological Station. Report prepared under Order 43910 -6 -0134 to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Jackson, Mississippi. Logan, T.J., A.C. Eller, Jr., R. Morrell, D. Ruffner, and J. Sewell. 1993. Florida panther habitat preservation plan - south Florida population. Prepared for the Florida Panther Interagency Committee. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004a. Draft standard protection measures for the eastern indigo snake. South Florida Ecological Services Office; Vero Beach, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004b. Draft survey protocols for the red- cockaded wood pecker. South Florida Ecological Services Office; Vero Beach, Florida. pT O United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE South Florida Ecological Services Office 'y4 CH a 1339 20'x' Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 May 8, 2009 Claudine Auclair Collier County Transportation Service Department 2885 Horseshoe Drive South Naples, Florida 34104 Service Federal Activity Code: Service Consultation Code: Date Received: Project: County: Dear Ms. Auclair: FIWI�Am 4I420- 2008 -FA -0192 41420 - 2008 -TA -0093 January 14, 2009 Wilson Boulevard Extension/ Benfield Road Corridor Study Collier Thank you for the opportunity to meet with my staff and staff from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) on April 1, 2009, to discuss the Wilson Boulevard /Benfield Road Corridor Study. This letter provides the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) comments on study. The purpose of the study is to explore the need for a new north -south road roadway in Collier County, extending Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard south to U.S. Highway 41 (Tamiami Trail [US 41 ]). The stated purpose of the new roadway is the relief of traffic congestion on Collier Boulevard (CR -951) and Everglades Boulevard, and improved connectivity to 1 -75 and US 41 to aid in hurricane evacuation and emergency access. Four alternatives have been developed forthe project: 1) No- Build; 2) Miller Boulevard; 3A) Wilson- Benfield West; and 3B) Wilson - Benfield East. The Service notes that Alternatives 2, 3A, and 3B are located within the Service's Focus Area (Service 2007) and the "Primary" and "Secondary" Zones (as defined by Kautz et al., 2006) for the endangered Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). Telemetry data provided by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) and monitoring studies conducted in the Picayune Strand Restoration Project (PSRP) indicate that the panther occurs throughout the study area. The Service finds that the implementation of Alternatives 2, 3A, or 313 will result in significant direct and indirect adverse impacts to the Florida panther. The direct impacts to the panther from these alternatives would include habitat loss and fragmentation of existing habitat, and disturbance to the panther during construction activities. The indirect effects would include additional loss of panther habitat from commercial and residential development likely to be induced by the access provided by these roadway alternatives. We believe that the development would be substantial, and likely result in the loss of existing panther habitat in lands located in the Belle Meade area north of I -75 and west of Everglades Boulevard, and private holdings within and adjacent to the Picayune Strand State Forest (PSSF). Additional indirect impacts resulting from the project include the degradation of existing panther habitat in the study area and disturbance to the panther resulting from vehicle use and other TAKE PRIDED -& IN�M ERiGA-- Claudine Auclair Page 2 human activities associated with motorized vehicles. The potential for panther mortality due to collisions with vehicles would increase due the presence of a new roadway in the study area. There have been a total of nine panther roadkills in the study area from December 2003 to the present. Alternative 2 (Miller Boulevard) conflicts with the project design and restoration objectives of the PSRP, a Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) project that originated under the Water Resource Development Act (WRDA) of 1996, in cooperation with the Big Cypress Basin of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), and furthered by WRDA 2000 and 2007. The project is supported by a coalition of State and Federal agencies and stakeholders, including the Department of the Interior. Approximately $38 million was provided to the State of Florida under the 1996 Farm Bill for land acquisition in the project. Since the inception of the CERP, the Service has considered the PSRP as one of the top priorities in the ecological restoration of south Florida. Our prioritization considers both the immense expanse of the property involved and its strategic location in completing a contiguous block of publicly- managed natural areas for the benefit of fish and wildlife including the endangered Florida panther. The PSRP fills in a key need to restore ecological integrity to an entire region of south Florida. It is noteworthy that a significant feature of the PSRP is road removal: over 250 miles of existing roadway, including portions of Miller Boulevard, will be removed from the project to enhance sheetflow restoration and provide habitat compensation for the Florida panther resulting from other CERP projects. Alternative 2 would bisect the PSRP unit from the Belle Meade unit of the PSSF, fragmenting contiguous public lands, which would result in landscape -scale impacts to the Florida panther and other wide - ranging species. The Belle Meade watershed (north and south) is also included as a project proposal (Belle Meade Flowway Restoration) in the Southwest Florida Feasibility Study draft Comprehensive Master Plan. The project was ranked in 2008 by the project Study Team as the fifth most important group of projects in the 6- county project study area, based on rankings of benefits to regional water quality, sensitive lands, and estuaries considered over the 9 -year life of the study. Other federally listed species known to occur in the study area include the endangered wood stork (Mycteria americana) and the endangered red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis). Direct impacts to red - cockaded woodpecker habitat would occur as a result of the proposed Alternative 2, 3A and 3B road alignments. The potential for expansion of the red - cockaded woodpecker through augmentation within the PSSF would also be substantially diminished by new road corridors through the forest and along its western boundary. The Service and other resource agencies have strategically located off -site wetland mitigation and listed species compensation (particularly for the red - cockaded woodpecker) from hundreds of acres of development occurring on the west side of Collier Blvd. and developments within the urban boundary east of Collier Blvd. to the PSSF and PSSF west boundary. As part of these negotiated assessments, urban development was also intentionally sited in proximity to Collier Blvd to avoid impacting the State forest. The underlying purpose of siting these mitigation parcels at these locations was to maximize the potential for managed wetlands and listed species habitat to function over the long -term. Claudine Auclair Page 3 The wetlands and upland habitats within the study area also provide important habitat for a variety of other fish and wildlife species, including State- listed wading birds and the State - threatened Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus). We note that research conducted by the FWC has shown that vehicle traffic is an impediment to bear movement, and that the long -term persistence of small isolated populations of bears in fragmented habitats is doubtful due to high levels of mortality attributable to close proximity to humans, and the inability of female bears to disperse through development into available remaining habitat (T. Gilbert, Personal Communication). The Service believes that the implementation of Alternatives 2, 3A, and 3b would result in adverse impacts to the Florida black bear similar to those discussed for the Florida panther. In summary, the study area contains a large acreage of lands protected for conservation purposes including the PSSF, managed by the Florida Division of Forestry (DOF), as well as lands placed under conservation easement with the SFWMD through State Environmental Resource Permits and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 permits. In addition, the area contains lands preserved as mitigation by Collier County for impacts to natural resources in the Belle Meade Area, and lands of national interest bound by agreements under WRDA 2000, WRDA 2007, and the 1996 Farm Bill. The Service finds, that Alternatives 2, 3A, and 3B will result in significant direct and indirect adverse effects to these conservation lands, and we concur with the concerns and comments presented to you by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (March 16, 2009), DOF (March 3, 2009), SFWMD (March 23, 2009), and FWC (April 29, 2009). To reiterate, adverse effects to conservation lands include, but are not limited to, the likely increase adverse effects to the endangered Florida panther, loss and degradation of natural communities, creation of barriers to management (e.g., ability to conduct prescribed burning and exotic plant and animal control, etc.), creation of new sources of exotic species, and the potential alteration of wetlands scheduled or proposed for restoration under the CERP and local and regional restoration plans. Due to the adverse impacts anticipated for the Florida panther, fish and wildlife resources, public conservation lands, and lands proposed for restoration within the CERP, we do not support Alternatives 2, 3A, and 3B and recommend that Collier County adopt the "no build' alternative. We urge Collier County to investigate other innovative means to reduce traffic congestion in the area, such as improvement of other sections of the existing transportation network. We look forward to working with Collier County to resolve this transportation issue while protecting federally listed species and other fish and wildlife resources. We also encourage Collier County to consider a landscape level approach to conservation and development. Collier County's Rural Landscape Stewardship Area program to funnel future development to appropriate areas and conserve valuable natural resources such as wildlife habitat provides a framework that could be used in other locations. As discussed in our meeting with you on April 1, 2009, we look forward to continuing work with Collier County and the FWC to develop an agreement that identifies areas targeted for development as well as areas needed to conserve the panther and other federally listed species. Collier County also has the opportunity to comprehensively address impacts to listed species from development projects proposed by the county or private entities (e.g., county roads or utility project, single - family homes, etc.) that do not have a Federal nexus (e.g., projects that do not receive Federal funding or require a Corps permit to fill wetlands, etc.). Accordingly, we recommend that Collier County work with the Service to Claudine Auclair Page 4 Conservation Plan. We remain committed to providing you with technical assistance to complete this effort in partnership. Thank you for allowing us to provide these comments and for your cooperation and effort in protecting federally listed species and fish and wildlife. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact John Wrublik at 772 - 562 -3909, extension 282. Sincere our, aul Souza Field Supervisor South Florida Ecological Services Office cc: Collier County BCC, Naples, Florida Corps, Jacksonville, Florida (Eric Summa, Richard Newton, Stu Applebaum) Corps, Ft. Myers, Florida (Skip Bergmann) DEP, Tallahassee, Florida (Greg Knecht, John Outland) DEP, Ft. Myers, Florida (Jennifer Nelson) DEP, Rookery Bay NERR, Naples, Florida (Gary Lytton) DOF, Naples, Florida (Greg Ihle) DOF, Tallahassee, Florida (James R. Karels) DOF, Ft. Myers, Florida (Hank Graham) Florida Wildlife Federation, Naples, Florida (Nancy Payton) FWC, Tallahassee, Florida (Mary Ann Poole) FWC, Naples, Florida (Darrell Land) FWC, Tallahassee, Florida (Kipp Frohlich) Service, Naples, Florida (Layne Hamilton, Kim Dryden) South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force (Joan Lawrence) SFWMD, West Palm Beach, Florida (Ken Ammon) SFWMD (BCB), Naples, Florida (Clarence Tears) SFWMD, Ft. Myers, Florida (Janet Starnes) SWFRPC, Ft. Myers, Florida Claudine Auclair Page 5 LITERATURE CITED Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, and K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. Revisions to the Florida panther final interim standard local operating procedures (SLOPES) for endangered species. Fish and Wildlife Service; Vero Beach, Florida. EXHIBIT 29 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL SURVEY REPORT L A Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel, Collier County, Florida by John G. Beriault, B.A. Craig A. Weaver, M.A.G. conducted under the direction of Robert S. Carr, M.S. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy for Sembler Company, Inc. AHC Technical Report #678 December 2005 2005.142 st of Figures msultant Summary ojeet Setting evious Research Cultural Summary Methodology Results and Conclusions Summary of Sites Recommendations References Cited Appendix 1: Toll- Rattlesnake Parcel General Field Specimen Log Appendix 2: Jump Start Hammock Field Specimen Log Appendix 3: Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel Shovel Test and Target Log Appendix 4: Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel Survey Log Appendix 5: Toll- Rattlesnake Parcel Site Forms Table of Contents i I 3 6 10 20 23 25 37 39 47 48 50 65 69 v List of Figures 1. Map of Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel project area 2 2. Aerial photograph of the Toll- Rattlesnake parcel 5 3. Map of the Toll - Rattlesnake parcel area showing selected targets 22 and archaeological sites. 4. View northwest, Clamshell Cove Midden Site 8CR878. 28 5. Abraded sand - tempered plain body sherd found at 8CR878. 28 6. View east at the hammock containing the White Shell Hammock Site, 8CR879 30 7. A Busycon contrarium columella "chisel" or gouge found at 8CR879 30 8. Deep Marsh Hammock Site (8CR880) showing location of shovel tests 32 9. View north at pond apple swamp south of Deep Marsh Hammock, 8CR880 33 10. View north at Gene Erjavec sifting material from Shovel Test 6 in 8CR880 33 11. Jumpstart Hammock Site (8CR881) showing location of shovel tests, 35 site and buffer boundaries 12. View west at Gene Erjavec sifting material from Shovel Test 1 in 8CR881 36 13. View northeast at apple pond slough southeast of the Jump -Start Hammock Site 36 fN Consultant Summary In October through December 2005, the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy Inc. (AHC) conducted an archaeological assessment for the Sembler Company, Inc. of the Toll- Rattlesnake parcel located east of State Road 951 and spanning the north and south sides of Saba[ Palm Road in southwestern Collier County. The +2300 acre parcel was surveyed to locate sites of archaeological and/or historical significance. This assessment represents the completion of an earlier stage of survey, when the parcel footprint was smaller. This assessment was conducted in accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public Law 89 -665), as amended in 1992, and 36 C.F.R., Part 800: Protection of Historic Properties. The work and the report conform to the specifications set forth in Chapter IA -46, Florida Administrative Code. The parcel encompasses parts of Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 25 in Township 50S, Range 26E and Sections 18, 19, and 30 in Township 505, Range 27E. The parcel is an area of mixed impacts and natural areas containing tropical hardwood hammocks, sloughs, deep marshes, and slash pine and cypress communities. The parcel contains one structure, a modern hunting camp. None of the structures on the parcel are in excess of 50 years old. This assessment resulted in the identification of thirty -six targets or anomalies which were identified as being possible hammocks that could be associated with archaeological sites. A total of ninety five shovel tests (45 cm square) were dug across the parcel on selected medium to high probability targets, usually oak, cabbage palm, or hardwood hammocks. These tests were excavated to sterile sediments or to limestone caprock. Five prehistoric sites were documented on the parcel. Four of these were previously unrecorded (CR878 -881) and one site, 8CR556, was previously recorded. The four previously unrecorded sites are the Clamshell Cove Midden (8CR878), White She[] Hammock Midden (8CR879), Deep Marsh Hammock Midden (8CR880), and the Jump - Start Hammock Midden (8CR881). Three sites were delineated with systematic shovel testing. The other two sites are small and are encompassed within discreet upland hammock "islands." All five are regarded as being of local significance, of which three are potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, based on criteria (d) for sites "that have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory" important to southwest Florida. Sites CR556, CR878, CR879, CR880, and CR881 should be preserved if possible. If preservation of all or parts of these five sites is not feasible, then additional archaeological investigations should be conducted there to fully assess their significance. There are also three other areas of archaeological concern, Targets 3, 13 and 18, which should be further investigated if developmental plans call for these three areas to be impacted. Although our phase 1 testing there yielded no archaeological materials, a phase 2 investigation is recommended because of the possibility that such materials might occur Figure 1. Map of the Toll- Raidesnake parcel .area 0 114 112 1 Mile USGS MAPS: BELLE MEADE AND BELLE MEADE NUV 199-1 f Figure 1. Map of the Toll- Raidesnake parcel .area 0 114 112 1 Mile USGS MAPS: BELLE MEADE AND BELLE MEADE NUV 199-1 Project Setting The subject parcel is located in parts of Sections I1, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, and 25 in Township 50S, Range 26E and Sections 18, 19, and 30 in Township 50S, Range 27E. east of State Road 951 and irmnediately south and north of Sabal Palm Road in the Rattlesnake Hammock/Sabal Palm Road area of southwestern Collier County, Florida (Figure 1). The ± 2300 acre project area is a many -sided polygon with sides more or less oriented to the cardinal points, containing several smaller outparcels which are not subjects of the present survey (Figure 2). The relevant USGS maps are Belle Meade and Belle Meade NON, Fla. The Toli- Rattlesnake parcel is situated near the eastern side of an extensive and amorphous series of cabbage palm, live oak, tropical hardwood hammocks flanked by and containing deep marsh /slough systems. This area is collectively ]mown as Rattlesnake Hammock. This several- square mile area contains great floristic and topographic diversity. High ground areas include live oak/saw palmetto /cabbage palm hammocks with varying percentages of tropical hardwoods that can include myrsine, white indigo berry, white stopper, camphorwood, soft- leafed and shiny leafed wild coffee, wild lime, lancewood, strangler fig, gulf gray twig, gumbo limbo, willow bustic, mastic, hog plum, coral bean, fire bush, hackberry, red mulberry, and others. Other moderately high - ground areas are rounded slash pine/ saw palmetto islands containing red bay, dahoon holly, myrsine, staggerbush, rusty lyonia, pennyroyal mint, gallberry, ferns, and wax myrtle among other plants. Flanking these high ground areas and running as north -south linear transverse depressions are deep sloughs and bald cypress swamps and marsh ponds. These areas even with present -day drainage activities contain standing water much of the year and support a rich diversity of plant and animal Iife. Some of the plant species present include cordgrasses (Spartina spp.) and succulent marsh plants such as pickerelweed (Pontederia lanceolata) and arrowhead (Sagittaria spp.) and ferns such as swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), Thelypteris and Osrnunda ferns. The deep open marshes of the area are likely relict burnt cypress solution holes and pond features as evinced by the abundant dead snags and logs of that species. At present, many of these features contain pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana), pond apple (Annona glabra), coastal plain willow (Salix caroliniana), and buttonbush. Many acres, particularly in the eastern part of the parcel contain extensive areas of open, low "hatrack" cypress which are flooded much of the year. Many of the individual trees, though stunted, are quite old. Selective coring of these and similar cypress has revealed many of these broad- buttressed trees can be several centuries old. All of these environmental zones were heavily exploited by prehistoric Indians, early white settlers, and more recently recreational hunters. The geology of the Rattlesnake Hammock area is characterized by solutioned limestone caprock lying exposed or overlain to various depths by sands or sheily marls. In cypress sloughs, but particularly in cypress dome /solution ponds there are potentially deep deposits of muck or peat. A fine tan sand found extensively in the district is Immolcalee fine sand which usually overlies relict marine deposits of shelly marl and marly limestone caprock that are part of the Pleistocene Caloosahatchee and Fort Thompson formations. These marine marls contain lenses and deposits of clay intermixed with varying percentages of sand. These clays may have been a source for ceramic manufacture by the Formative period Native Americans. Mantling the Immokalee sands are windblown deposits of gray sands of varying depths. Other areas contain tan and gray sand surfacial zones overlying a dense brown sand spodic horizon (often referred to as "hardpan "). This formation is a zone of organic leaching accumulation. Occasionally, harder "nuggets" or nodules of an iron oxide precipitate will be found in this zone, which is sometimes a basal archaeological zone. Both the Caloosahatchee and Fort Thompson marls and the associated limestone caprock contain the index fossil bivalve, Chione cancellata, in quantity. Depths of sand or marl overburden seldom exceed 70 centimeters. Many higher ground formations in the area appear to be bedrock unconformitics that consist of fully exposed tabular slabs of limestone caprock containing numerous rounded solution holes. 4 Previous Research Southwest Florida has been a focus of archaeological investigations since the 1880s, although much of the early work was directed toward the recovery of museum quality artifacts rather than understanding cultural processes. Griffin (1988:48 -50) discussed some of the very early references to archaeological sites in south Florida. He noted that these early reports were mostly casual observations, and few appear to refer to southwest Florida, but rather refer to the southeast and Key West areas. Kenworthy's (1883) informal report on shell mounds and ancient canals was one of the first reports of Southwest Florida archaeological sites. At about the same time as Kenworthy's investigations, Simons (1884) gave a narrative account of some of the very large coastal shell middens, and Douglass (1885) provided :further infon- nation about prehistoric canals (although he did not accept that they were prehistoric). One described canal near Gordon's Pass is probably the Naples Canal (8CR59), and one further north may be the Pineland Canal. Douglass' diaries record excavations of a post - contact era site (8CR41) on Horrs Island, as evidenced by the presence of European artifacts (Griffin, 1988:50 -51). Douglass visited Lostman's River and other areas in the Ten Thousand Island area, and a visit to Horrs Island was briefly narrated in Douglass (1890). In 1895 Dumford reported that cordage and other artifacts were recovered from a mangrove muck pond on Marco Island (site 8CR49). The material was shown to Cushing, who mounted a major project to recover more material from the site. Cushing (1897) reported recovering wood and other perishable artifacts from the muck pond on Marco Island, adjacent to a large shell works and midden village site. Publication of illustrations of the spectacular finds generated a great deal of subsequent interest. Wells M. Sawyer, a young artist accompanying the expedition, produced an excellent and presumably accurate contour map for the entire Key Marco Shell Midden. This map is valuable to present -day efforts in understanding many of the now obliterated features and interpreting (reconstructing) the "architecture" of the shell midden. Widmer (1983) notes that Cushing also focused attention on the nonagricultural chiefdom level of social organization supported by the rich estuary and marine resources, although his anthropological observations have remained overshadowed by the wealth of artifacts. Moore (1900, 1905, 1907) investigated a number of sites along the Collier /Lee County coast, apparently attempting to find material comparable to Cushing's finds, Although Moore provided information about site locations and general contents, most of his work was extremely crude and uncontrolled, by both contemporary archaeological standards, and by modern standards. The first attempt to systematically survey and investigate archaeological sites was initiated by Ales Hrdlicka, who visited a number of sites along the coast and tidal mangrove estuaries in 1918, focusing on the Ten Thousand Island region (Hrdlicka 1922). Hrdlicka noted that southwest Florida was a distinct region within south Florida and made an attempt to type sites by function. 0 Matthew Stirling's (1931, 1933) excavation of a burial mound on Horrs Island represents one of the first controlled excavations in Collier /Lee Counties (although he attempted stratigraphic control, Cushing had little success in his wet site excavation). The site was named the Blue Hill Mound, but it is not recorded under that name in the FMSF (either as a primary or secondary name), so it is unclear exactly which site he excavated, although it was probably site 8CR41 (McMichaels, 1982). These reports by Stirling are preliminary, and apparently neither a final report nor a skeletal analysis has been published. John M. Goggin was the first to define a south Florida cultural area (Glades Area), and describe south Florida ceramics (Glades ware), establishing a basis for later archaeological work. He published an analysis of the ceramic sequence in south Florida (Goggin, 1939, 1940). In later reports (Goggin, 1947, 1949a, 1949b), he formulated a basic framework of cultural areas and chronologies that is still current (although modifications with additional data have been made, see further discussion below). Goggin (194.9b) summarized much of this information in an unpublished manuscript, which Griffin (1988) thoroughly described. In passing, one unfortunate aspect of Goggin's work was a dependence on informant information for location of sites (especially interior sites) and he had a real concern that existing sites would be looted. This concern resulted in his either deliberately or incidentally reporting vague locational data for many sites. Some of these sites have never been satisfactorily relocated, although a few have undoubtedly been re- recorded by later investigators. For several decades, much of the subsequent archaeological investigations in the region took place in Lee and Charlotte Counties, especially in the Cape Haze, Charlotte Harbor and Pine Island areas. It is rumored that Goggin had a "gentleman's agreement" with many of the other leading practicing Florida archaeologists of the time that the South Florida area was his exclusive province to investigate. If this rumor is correct, it might explain the neglect shown the southwest Florida area in the archaeological arena from the end of World War II to Goggin's death in 1964. In 1956, Sears reported on a large village and mound complex at the mouth of Turner River on Chokoloskee Bay south of Marco Island, and in 1967 he reported on the results of a survey of the Cape Coral area (Sears, 1956, 1957). Laxson (1966) reported on excavations at Turner River Jungle Garden site, which is upriver from the Turner River site, although these have been confused in recent accounts. Van Beck and Van Beck (1965) excavated three small test pits on Marco Island (at the Marco midden, 8CR48) associated with the Cushing site (8CR49). The resulting publication of this work was some of the first reported scientific archaeological work to come from the southwest Florida area in nearly twenty years (Van Beck and Van Beck, 1965). In 1967 through 1969, Marco Island was extensively surveyed and a few sites were tested through excavation by Cockrell, Morrell, and others (Morrell, 1969). No complete site 7 report was ever published, although an unpublished and incomplete manuscript is available. Some of these sites were discussed in Cockrell's master's thesis (1970). Widmer performed a survey of Big Key, John Stevens Creek, Barfield Bay, Blue Hill Bay, and Collier Bay, which are proximal to Marco Island (Widmer, 1974). Widmer eventually utilized his southwest coast experience to write a doctoral dissertation on the Calusa that not only remains the definitive work on that group, but also explored the relationship between subsistence adaptation and cultural evolution (Widmer, 1983). In Lee County, Arlene Fradkin and other investigators from the University of Florida began an ongoing involvement with the Pine Island Sound/Sanibel Island area in the 1970s. Her first investigations were at the Wightman site on northern Sanibel Island (Fradkin, 1976). Several archaeologists excavated at Horrs Island in the 1980s. McMichaels (1982) reviewed sites on Horrs Island in a Master's thesis. In 1983, Marquardt began a series of investigations at Josslyn Key, Useppa Island, Pineland, Buck Key, Galt Island in Lee County, and at Big Mound Key in Charlotte County (Marquardt, 1984, 1987, 1988, 1992). Marquardt and Russo have investigated Horrs Island in Collier County. A number of the large shell midden village sites they excavated appear to be late Archaic, and they expect to document a more elaborate social organization at these sites and larger sedentary or semi - sedentary population sizes than previously known for that period (Russo, 1990, and pets. comm.). Most of these studies focused on the coastal sites, as have subsequent summaries and discussions. Recent work on the interior has made significant advances in documenting the extent and intensity of inland resources, especially in the Big Cypress and Everglades parks ( Ehrenhard et al., 1978, 1979; Ehrenhard and Taylor 1980; Ehrenhard et al., 1980; Taylor and Komara 1983; Taylor, 1984, 1985). Griffin's (1988) synthesis of the Everglades Park data is the defining work on south Florida archaeology to date. Athens (1983) summarized some of the results of the Big Cypress survey, but more analysis of this data resource is needed. Beriault and colleagues (1981) reported on salvage excavations at Bay West Nursery (8CR200). Their description of the site includes a well known but rare and infrequently documented Early and Middle Archaic use of ponds for cemeteries. In 1995, Widmer and Story began an ongoing investigation at the Key Marco Midden (Widmer, 1996). In the first season they excavated with the help of graduate students and volunteers. The results of their work have appeared in the Florida Anthropologist. In the last two decades the pressure of development, as well as a recognized need for preservation or mitigation of prehistoric sites has led to a number of reports by commercial cultural resource management consultants. While most of these reports are limited in scope due to restriction to a small tract of land, many have produced useful summaries of regional archaeology, as well as insightful analysis of the relationship between site types and location and ecotypes. (Almy and Deming, 1982, 1986a, 1986b, 8 1986c, 1987; Austin, 1987; Carr and Allerton 1988x, 1988b; Deming and Almy, 1987, 1988; Fay and Carr 1990; Fuhrmeister et al., 1990; Martinez, 1977; Miller and Fryman, 1978; Swift and Carr, 1989). Arthur W. Lee, John Beriault and others in the Southwest Florida Archaeological Society (SWFAS) have recorded and investigated a large number of archaeological sites in Collier and Lee Counties. It is an ongoing effort of the Society to publish and disseminate reports and manuscripts (Lee et al., 1993, 1997, 1998; Beriault, 1973, 1982, 1986, 1987; Beriault and Strader, 1984). Many of these reports deal with small interior seasonal sites. This avocationist society is one of the strongest voices for the protection of Collier and Lee County archaeological resources, and they have been careful to document their excavations, the majority of which are salvage operations on sites that have been heavily impacted or threatened with pending development. In addition, Beriault has provided several unpublished manuscripts as to site types and areas (Beriault 1982, 1987). The Archaeological and Historical Conservancy has investigated several large parcels in the Rattlesnake Hammock area. In 1993, AHC personnel investigated the Lely Estates Parcel west and directly adjoining the present subject parcel locating seven prehistoric sites (Carr and Steele, 1993). In 1998, AHC personnel conducted a Phase One assessment of the three square mile Winding Cypress adjoining the present subject parcel locating eleven prehistoric sites (Beriault and Carr, 1998). In July 2003, the AHC worked in the 43 acre Newton PUD Parcel between Johns and Amity Roads east and adjoining the present subject parcel and documented four sites including an eastern component of the Buschelman Site, 8CR726 (Beriault 2003). In November, 2003, AHC personnel worked on the proposed CR951 (Collier Blvd.) road widening area adjacent to and west of the subject parcel. The area of the western (main) part of the Buschelman Site, 8CR726 to be impacted was examined, and one previously unrecorded archaeological site, the Sable Palm Road Site, located one half mile south of the Buschelman Site, was investigated. In the early 1980s, the Southwest Florida Archaeological Society through the efforts of John Beriault and Charlie Strader endeavored to record all archaeological sites in Collier and southern Lee County known to the group. Nearly 100 site forms were submitted to the State Site File. One of the sites in the subject parcel, Hunting Camp Hammock, 8CR556, is located in the project parcel and was filed at that time by Strader. Beriault had visited the site in 1983 and noted it was a midden with sand - tempered plain ceramics on the surface and a recently abandoned modern hunting camp on the site, however, an error was made in recording the distance and direction of the site. The site is actually located approximately 900 feet to the southwest of the location reported in the 1985 site form. we Cultural Summary Stirling was the first to distinguish the indigenous prehistoric cultures of southern Florida in 1936 by defining a Glades cultural area, including all of south Florida (Carr et cal., 1994b:9; Milanich, 1994:5 -6). Griffin (1988) pointed out that this was not fonnulated as a strict cultural area, but it was rather a geographic region with some common cultural traits. Kroeber (1939), in a review of North American prehistory, utilized a slightly different term, the "South Florida Area," basing his definition on both environmental and cultural factors. Subsequently Goggin delineated more particular boundaries for southern Florida and divided the region into three sub - areas: "Okeechobee" around Lake Okeechobee, "Tekesta" for southeast Florida and the Florida Keys, and "Calusa" for Southwest Florida (Carr et al., 1994b:10; Goggin, 1947:114 -127). Following Goggin's study, subsequent researchers have refined or altered the cultural distinctions attributed to southern Florida's prehistoric populations. There has been criticism that Goggin's names and definitions were based on historic accounts of the main (proto) historic groups found in the respective regions and not on the archaeological evidence of spatial, temporal, and cultural differences (Sears, 1966; Griffin, 1974; Carr and Beriault, 1984; Griffin, 1988). Griffin, in particular, questioned the distinctions. He believed that South Florida cultures varied only by local environmental conditions and ceramic exchange rates. Griffin believed the inhabitants of prehistoric southern Florida were mainly dwelling on the coast and that the interior was nearly uninhabited and under- utilized. Griffin designated the entire southern Florida region as the "Circum- Glades" area (Eck, 1997:5; Griffin, 1974:342 -346). This new designation for the area was furthered by a widely circulated book on Florida archaeology by Milanich and Fairbanks (1980). Griffin later (1988) retreated to some extent from his earlier position as further research (particularly by Ehrenhard, Carr, Komara, and Taylor in the Big Cypress and Carr in the eastern Everglades in the 1970s and 1980s) showed abundant sites (and concomitant use and habitation) in the interior and Everglades. Carr and Beriault, in particular, have taken issue with the concept of a Circum - Glades region. Carr's research in the Big Cypress and Everglades and his subsequent analysis demonstrating variation of key cultural markers (particularly in decorated ceramics) formed the basis for this contention. There is abundant evidence for cultural (and probably political or tribal) diversity in the various areas of south Florida. Carr and Beriault particularly noted and defined differences between the lower southwest Florida coast, which they termed the "Ten Thousand Island" region, and the area to the north, which they called the "Caloosahatchee" region. This latter area they believed to be the seat of the historic Calusa chiefdomship, although previous (and some subsequent) researchers have called the entire southwest Florida from Cape Sable to the Cape Haze peninsula (and beyond) in Charlotte County "Calusa." Griffin, in his definitive 1988 synthesis on Everglades archaeology, attempted to reconcile and refine some of the conflict in the definition of south Florida prehistoric and historic culture areas. As stated by Carr and colleagues (1994b), "the issue.-appears in part to be one of trying to determine the significance of regional and temporal variation, rather than whether these differences are real." There is evidence that changes through 10 time in regional political affiliations or realties makes any model not addressing this complex issue two- dimensional. The Calusa hegemony that was in place by the time of the arrival of Europeans may have begun as early as 800 AD in the Ten Thousand Island "district" or area (Griffin, 1988:321; Carr et al., 1994b:12). There is currently ongoing research to further refine present thought as to cultural affiliations in south Florida. It would seem only a matter of time before new directions and emphases provide a more accurate summation of south Florida cultural affinities. Using the present models, the coastal zones of Collier County and southern Lee County contain three distinct culture areas. Indian Hill on Marco Island lies thirty miles from the projected interface by Carr and Beriault (1984) of the Caloosahatchee area (called the "the `heartland' of the Calusa, "Carr et al., 1994b:12) to the north, and the Ten Thousand Islands area to the south. At a yet undefined point to the east lies the Okeechobee cultural area, but the boundary, if it is a definite, fixed one, is likely to occur in the vicinity of the Immokalee rise forty miles or more to the northeast of Indian Hill. Further work is in progress by Carr to address the issue of where the southwest boundaries of the Okeechobee culture area occur. Temporal Periods and .Adaptations At the same time that the south Florida archaeological cultural models have evolved over the past 60 -plus years, so have the temporal markers or framework on which we base evolution of that culture. Much of this latter effort has resulted from comparisons made between the recovered artifacts from the 100 -year period of scientific and nonscientific excavation and collection by the various individuals and institutions (and others) enumerated in part above. This Floridian effort must be seen against the broader background of archaeological work in eastern North America and the New World as a whole. All of these efforts have been mutually complimentary and certainly not exclusive. In south Florida, the following periods and adaptations are generally accepted. Part of this chronology involving the later or Formative period is called the Glades sequence in honor of Goggin, the greater part of whose work in defining the ceramic sequence or markers has withstood the test of time and subsequent criticism ( Goggin, 1939, 1947, 1949c). From Goggin's day to present, pottery variability in form, substance, and decoration has proven useful for providing time markers, at least during the archaeologically - brief (± 3500 year) period spanning the late Archaic and Formative periods that it was produced. Other .artifact types and their variations have, to present, proven somewhat less reliable as absolute indicants of prehistoric age. Radiocarbon dating, a phenomena of the last 30 -plus years, provides, within the standard deviation expressed in plus -or -minus years BP (before present), a relatively absolute date for a given sample and provides a yardstick to measure traits or distinctions in provenienced artifacts. Determining and adequately defining what traits we can discern against this absolute is part of the ongoing function of the regional archaeological effort. I The following information is generalized and abbreviated. The dates are approximate; transitions between periods are in reality more gradual that the manner they are expressed for convenience. Paleo Period _(14,_000 - 8,500 BP During the Paleo Period, the first Native Americans began moving into the southeastern portion of North America and Florida. Most evidence of their presence in Florida can be reliably dated to about 10,000 BP. There are no known Paleoindian sites in Collier County. Several are documented from elsewhere in south Florida, including Warm Mineral Springs and Little Salt Springs in Sarasota County (Cockrell and Murphy, 1978; Clausen and Gifford, 1975), Harney Flats in Hillsborough County (Daniel and Wisenbaker, 1987) and the Cutler Fossil Site in Dade County (Carr, 1986). During this period, the terminal Wisconsian ice age, the climate was probably less extreme, with cooler summers and warmer winters. The climate was also drier, and sea levels were lower (Carbone, 1983; Allerton and Can 1988a; Griffin, 1988). One reason that possible Paleo period sites have not been discovered in Collier and Lee Counties is that the shoreline may have been as much as 100 miles further west due to lower sea levels. Drier conditions may have made the interior very inhospitable, and the shallow estuarine and littoral sites that existed were flooded by post -ice age Holocene sea rises. Any possible interior sites from the Paleo Period may be unrecognizable due to lack of diagnostic artifacts, subsequent reuse of site areas, low population density, and few permanent camps. These and other factors may help explain the absence to date of identifiable Paleo period sites in Collier and Lee Counties. On the other hand, the southwest Florida coast south of Charlotte Harbor may have been uninhabitable during this period due to an absence of key conditions for the successful hunting of large game, a trait of the Paleo period. Archaic Period 8 500 - Z,500 BP The Archaic period reflects a post - Pleistocene shift in adaptation marked by an increase in the seasonal exploitation of a broad spectrum of food resources, a more restricted use of territory due to regional specialization, and more semi - sedentary habitation sites. No ceramics are known until the Late Archaic. During the Archaic, regional specializations became more marked, not only with material culture but also with distinct local utilization of local plant and animal resources. As mentioned above, there is, as yet, no firm evidence of human presence in southwest Florida during the Paleo period. This apparently is also true for the Early Archaic (8500 - 7000BP), as there is evidence of an environment too and to support scrub oalc, and the presence of shifting wind formed dunes (Watts, 1975; Widmer, 1983). No early Archaic sites are known from southwest Florida ( Allerton and Can, 1988:14). 12 By about 6500 BP mesie conditions began to spread, although localized xeric conditions continued (and still exist in some areas) through south Florida. Middle Archaic sites dating from this time are rare, although the Bay West Nursery site (8CR200) in Collier County and the Ryder Pond site (8LL1850) in Lee County near Bonita Springs provide evidence of occupation, as do several sites in southeast Florida. The Bay West site is a Middle Archaic cypress pond cemetery, associated with a lithic scatter. The Ryder Pond site is a similar mortuary pond site surrounded by pine flatwoods (Carr and Heinz, 1996). Beriault has also recorded several aceramic shell scatters in coastal sand hills (paleo dunes), some of which may date to the Middle Archaic. Griffin (1988) summarizes evidence indicating that despite the rise of available surface water, brackish estuaries and other major modern landscape features had not formed, and population (or repopulation) was still sparse. During the Archaic period sea levels began to rise at a fairly rapid rate, estimated at 8.3 cm. per 100 years 6000 -3000 BP, and 3.5 cm per 100 years afterwards (Scholl et al., 1969), although whether sea levels were steadily rising or oscillating is still unclear (see Griffin 1988; Allerton and Carr, 1990 for recent reviews of the literature). Data is somewhat difficult to sort out as sea level rise was accompanied by both shore regression and transgression in places. As conditions became wetter (and warmer) in the interior, cypress swamps and hardwood sub - tropical forests established themselves by about 5000 BP (Carbone 1983, Delcourt and Delcourt 1981). By late Middle or early Late Archaic times (4000 years BP) there were significant shell mounds and middens on Horrs Island, Marco Island, and elsewhere in the coastal regions, suggesting that the estuary system had been established and was being utilized to provide the subsistence basis for denser populations and semi - sedentary settlements (Mon-ell, 1969; Cockrell, 1970). At Useppa Island in Lee County, excavations have provided radiocarbon dates from pre - ceramic shell middens ranging between roughly 4900 BP and 5600 BP, suggesting that the Middle Archaic as well as Late Archaic periods saw a growing dependence on shellfish resources (Milanich et al., 1984). There are aceramic coastal sand hill and interior wetland sites as well, but, these have not been demonstrated to be Archaic despite some investigators equating aceramic with preceramic. Radiocarbon dates for these sites would clarify this point. Allerton and Carr (1988) noted that a number of stratified sites in the wet mangrove and marsh areas of the Everglades, as well as on Horrs Island, contain Archaic preceramic horizons, although it is unclear if aceramic was equated with preceramic. Additional supporting evidence of interior use by Archaic peoples will provide a new dimension to the archaeological understanding of Archaic resource utilization. Allerton and Carr point out that if the wet tree islands were initially used by Archaic people, then at least some of the hardwood hammocks in swamp environments were raised in elevation (with subsequent changes in vegetation) due to human activities. Post - Archaic people extensively utilized these hammocks and continued to advance their development as distinct geomorphic features. This is obviously an area where additional archaeological investigations have a potential to contribute to understanding the interaction of geomorphic and cultural evolution in southwest Florida. 13 Toward the end of the Archaic there was the introduction of fiber- tempered pottery into the archaeological record, often used as a marker of the Orange Phase, commencing at about 4000 BP, either coincident with or soon after the development of the extensive shell middens. The Late Archaic Orange Phase subsistence strategy is characterized by intensive use of shellfish and marine resources, as well as being marked by an accelerated trend toward regional specializations. A number of the large shell middens on Marco Island (Cockrell, 1970), Horm Island (Russo n.d.), Cape Haze (Bullen and Bullen, 1956), and elsewhere date from this period or earlier, as they contain fiber- tempered ceramics, although there are known aceramic (preceramic ?) levels below the Orange Phase deposits that may date to the Middle Archaic. These shell middens are usually capped by deposits from later occupations as well. Formative Stage or Glades Periods 2500 BP - 500 B The Formative or Glades adaptation, based on hunting, fishing, and the harvesting of shellfish and plants, was similar to the Archaic, but was characterized by increasing specializations in gathering strategies and tool- making. Earlier writers have typed this hunter - gatherer society as primitive or "low- level" (Kroeber, 1939). However, there is certainly evidence from the specialization of tools, from the beautifully- executed wood carvings from Key Marco in Collier County and those from Fort Center near Lake Okeechobee (Cushing, 1897; Sears, 1982), and from the historic accounts of the Calusa hegemony, that the south Florida area had an advanced culture that Goggin (1964) has called a "stratified non - agrarian society." The preceding Late Archaic late Orange phase (also known as the transitional phase) was marked by changes in pottery, and terminated with the relatively rapid replacement of fiber- tempered pottery with sand - tempered, limestone- tempered, and chalky "temperless" pottery. It was also characterized by changes in ceramic style and often by reduction in the size of stone projectile points. The Formative Stage (beginning about 2500 BP) is divided in south Florida into the Glades Periods sequence. Subsistence adaptation is marked by a narrowing spectrum of resource use, as well as continued trends toward regional diversity and ecological specializations, marked in part by the proliferation of inland resource extraction encampments. Formative Period cultural evolution eventually led to increased political sophistication, perhaps initially of modest dimensions, but culminating in broad regional political alliances and regulation of materials and goods (i.e. resources) between the coast and inland areas (Milanich and Fairbanks, 1980). By protohistoric and contact times the Calusa were the dominant tribal group, gaining broad political influence and at least partial control over much of south Florida as far north as central Brevard County. Historically, the main Calusa village has been regarded as "Calos" on Mound Key in Estero Bay in Lee County, although 50 to 70 large villages were under direct Calusa control by contact times (Griffin, 1988). 14 During the Fon- native Periods, village sites grew to the proportions of large multi -tlse complexes, particularly along the coast and barrier islands of southwest Florida. Some of the projected intra -site functions of the elements of these complex shellworks were as temples, canals, causeways, temple and platform mounds, courtyards and watercourts. Current research involving the excavating of large contiguous areas of these shell mound complexes is beginning to establish demonstrable uses for the features of these large sites, upon which heretofore were merely speculated (Widmer, 1996). Tidal estuary rivers and inland hammocks along deep water sloughs, marshes, and permanent ponds were seasonally visited for extraction of natural resources, and are now marked by small to relatively large black dirt middens, some of which may have been semi - permanent hamlets. The pine and cypress flatwoods appear to have supported few sites, although areas around Lake Trafford and other rich interior areas developed substantial sites, including sand mounds, and may be more similar to the Okeechobee cultural area than to the coastal cultures. In 1992, Dickel and Carr excavated an apparent Deptford Period burial mound (the Oak Knoll Site) in the Bonita Bay Tract north of the Imperial River. Exotic trade items and seventy or more human burials were among the material findings. The resulting conclusions and subsequent surveying and testing of the Bonita Bay Shell works (8LL717) suggest social stratification and complexity may extend further back into the past than the Formative period (Dickel and Carr, 1992). Coastal sites (shell middens) reflect a predominate dependence on fish and shellfish, wild plant foods and products, and larger inland game. The inland sites show a greater reliance on interior resources, including large, medium and small mammals, turtle, small freshwater fish, alligator, snake, frogs, and, sometimes, freshwater shellfish. Interior and coastal resource exchange can be documented by the consistent finds of moderate amounts of marine shell in many interior middens, as well as interior resources in coastal middens. The Formative Stage (with a nod to Goggin) has been often termed the Glades cultural tradition. Much of this "tradition" is focused on decorated ceramics, the minority ill the archaeological record, although the majority of recovered (rim) sherds are plainware. However, despite this, pottery (and its decorations) is usually utilized as the major temporal marker(s) for fitting sites into a temporal framework. Changes in pottery do not represent mere changes in artistic motifs, but reflect inter- and intra - regional trade contacts and outside cultural influences (possibly through exogamy, shifting of populations, and even the through evolution of a culture through time). Whatever the influences, the Glades tradition is continuous from post - Archaic times to contact times. Despite the fact that exogamy is likely to have been practiced, traders or other specialists probably moved between major cultural areas in small numbers, and genetic flow probably accompanied cultural exchange, although perhaps not on the same scale. This may have increased in later times due to use of traditional obligations of kinship and intermarriage to stabilize alliances that were not codified into a formal legal system. 15 The following table has been modified from several sources, but it is predominantly based on Milanich and Fairbanks (1980), Griffin (1988), and Allerton and Carr (1990). Dates have been rounded somewhat and translated to Before Present (BP). There are some differences of opinion in the dates, particularly about the timing of the Glades la and Ib division. TABLE 1: GLADES CULTURAL SEQUENCE Glades Ia (2500 BP - 1500 BP) First appearance of sand tempered plain pottery, but little else to mark a difference and the preceding Late Archaic. Sand tempered plain remains a predominate type throughout the Glades sequence. Glades lb (1500 BP - 1250 BP) First appearance of decorated sand - tempered ceramic (Ft. Drum Incised, Ft. Drum Punctated, Cane Patch Incised, Turner River PUnctate), plainware common. Pottery rim grooving and incision decorations become widespread. Glades IIa (1250 BP - 1100 BP) First appearance of Key Largo Incised, Sanibel Incised, Miami Incised, and plainware is common. Distinction between ceramics of southeast and southwest Florida becomes apparent. Ten Thousand Island area distinct from Caloosahatcllee area. First mound construction- increased social - - -- stratification ? - -- Population -- size may have approximated that at contact. Glades IIb (1100 - 1000 BP) First appearance of Matecumbe Incised; Key Largo Incised common on east coast, Gordon's Pass Incised common on the west, and plainware common throughout. Glades IIe (1000 BP - 800 BP) First appearance of Plantation Pinched, but few decorated wares with a preponderance of plainware (there is some evidence of population reduction - perhaps due to a cataclysmic event). Non -local pottery (e.g. St. Johns Plain and Check Stamped, Belle Glade Plain) appears. Glades IIIa (800 - 600 BP) First appearance of Surfside Incised, increasing quantities of St. Johns pottery (especially on East Coast), and Belle Glade pottery. Glades IIIb (600 BP - 500 BP) Glades Tooled rims appear (rare on West Coast), zoned punctate designs, but general decline in incised decoration. Belle Glade ceramics common 16 on west coast. St. Johns ware present but rare on West Coast, common on East Coast. Glades 1IIc (500 BP - 300 BP) Continuation of IIIb ceramics, with pronounced flaring of rims and embossing on Glades Tooled ceramics. Mound burial construction less common with intrusive burials into existing mounds, appearance of European goods, plainware common. By European contact times (the first half of the 16th century), the southwest coast of Florida was maintaining a vigorous, possibly expanding political chiefdom with a broad network of alliances, as well as a rich and ancient cultural tradition without an agricultural base. However, direct conflict with Europeans and, more importantly, exposure to European diseases led to the rapid decline of the Calusa. By the mid 1700s their numbers had greatly diminished. The remnants of this once - powerful tribe may have left south Florida in the 1760s with the Spanish for relocation in Cuba. Others may have become indistinguishable from Spanish Cuban fishermen who worked the great fishing "ranchos" in the Pine Island Sound region catching and salting fish for export to Cuba. Other groups of Native Americans may have fused with the Creek - derived Seminoles. In the late 1700s, members of the Creek tribe were forced into Florida from Georgia and Alabama. They were later called Seminoles, from the Spanish term "cimmarones." Pressures from colonial (and later) white encroachment on their traditional territories forced them into the Big Cypress and Everglades area by the 1830s. By this time, most of the cultural identity of pre - contact times had been lost, although some of the Calusa subsistence strategies may have been partly adopted by Seminoles. A number of Seminole period sites have been documented on earlier Glades middens. This coincidence may in part reflect the paucity of high land in the interior (Ehrenhard el al., 1978, 1979, 1980; Ehrenhard and Taylor, 1980; Taylor and Komara, 1983; Taylor, 1984, 1985). Older midden sites (particularly those called "black dirt" middens) can be rich agriculturally as well as archaeologically, making these foci for historic Seminole gardens and fruit groves. Seminole periods in south Florida are divided into I (1820 - 1860), Il (1860 -1900) and III (1900 -1940) (Ehrenhard et aL, 1978). Post -1940 Seminole camps are designated "Late Seminole" in some reports. These designations reflect the different stages of Seminole migration into south Florida, Seminole displacement and active conflict with the expanding American culture, and the eventual refuge by Seminole remnants in Big Cypress and Everglades regions. Military records, and, in particular, several sketch illaps by military personnel done in the 1830s and 1840s and the Ives military map of South Florida (1856) shows evidence of investigations at and near "Malco Inlet," "Casimba," "Good Land," and "Cape Romans." 17 Seminole Wars in the Southwest Florida Area The advent of the Second and Third Seminole W peaceful settlement of Lite Southwest Florida reg.waL. ...,.. •... . - -�• -• -- - - -- "temporary" and permanent, established along the Caloosahatchee River during this time. Fort Dulaney was established at Punta Rassa near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee in 1837 and was occupied intermittently through 1841, and again in 1 855. After a hurricane destroyed Ft. Dulaney in 1841, Fort Harvie was established upriver. The name of this fort was changed in 1850 by its commander General Twiggs to honor his new son -in -law, Col. Abraham Myers. Fort Myers was thus created, and became the chief fort of the region. From this central administrative point, a Iine of forts was established up the Caloosahatchee River. They were: Fort Denaud, Fort Adams, Fort Thompson, and Fort Center on Fisheating Creek leading into Lake Okeechobee. Other forts and "temporary depots" were established south into the Big Cypress Swamp such as Fort Simon Drum, Temporary Depot Number One, Fort Doane, Fort Simmons, Fort Keis, Fort Foster, Fort Shackleford, and others. A number of military expeditions were sent south along the coast during the Second and Third Seminole Wars with the objectives of interdicting trade in guns and ammunition between the Seminoles and the Spanish -Cuban fishing community, and hunting and capturing Indians. General Thomas Lawson, who had just been appointed Surgeon General of the United States, commanded one of the early notable expeditions. Lawson's expedition left Fort Harvie (Fort Myers) in February 1838. Elements of Lawson's command explored the area in and around the Caxambas Point area, discovering two abandoned Indian villages in the Blackwater River/Palm Bay area. Other expeditions bivouacked at Cape Romano and Caxambas Point. Colonel Rogers, of the ill -fated Parkhill expedition, wrote several dispatches from Cape Romano in the Caxambas area in 1858, describing the ambush of Captain Parkhill's party at the headwaters of Turner River. The Collier County Museum is the repository for a collection of military artifacts purportedly found by a local collector near Indian Hill in the early 1960s. This material may have originated with one of the various military expeditions stopping at Caxambas Point. In the Rattlesnake Hammock area, Old Fort Foster was established and occupied several times as a "temporary depot." This installation was situated along a trail crossing a hammock and deep slough area somewhere west of the subject parcel. A skirmish was also reportedly fought near this locale in 1837. Rattlesnake Hammock Area History The Rattlesnake Hammock area has always been attractive to various people, both during prehistoric and historic times. There is evidence from military maps of Seminole Wars period that various villages and encampments of Seminoles were in the general area of the hammock. By the 1880s, various white settlers and homesteaders such as the Whiddens, Carrolls, Smiths, and Kirklands had settled the area of Henderson Creel( immediately south of Rattlesnake Hammock. These early settlers farmed the Henderson Creek area and hunted up into Rattlesnake Hammock. Various early sportsmen visiting or wintering in Naples took oxcart trips into the Rattlesnake Hammock area to hunt. The advent of the Tamiami Trail in the late 1920s further opened access to the area. The completion of the Atlantic Coastline Railway by 1928 also enabled logging of pine and cypress in the Belle Meade area south of Rattlesnake Hammock. State Road 951 was built in the late 1950s /early 1960s and opened up Rattlesnake Hammock to development by landholders. The Sabal Palm Road community was created during that time period. Landscaping demands in the rapidly- developing Naples area caused early residents such as the Langford family and "Monkey" Hunter to dig and transport cabbage palms fi-0111 the hanunock. Other individuals such as Seth and Buster Johns harvested cypress trees for their sawmill on Johns Road near the subject parcel. In the early 1980s, a Naples area tradition, the Swamp Buggy Races, was moved from a locale it had occupied since 1953 on Radio Road to a larger modern facility at the newly created Florida Sports Park east of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and CR951. This venue comprised a series of races by "classes" of homemade off -road vehicles, generally utilizing outsized tires and custom made chassis called "swamp buggies ". The first swamp buggy was reputed to have been created by Ed Frank Sr. of Naples in the 1920s with the original purpose of using the vehicle for hunting. Formal races the week prior to hunting season were first held in the Iate 1940s at a marsh called Newman's Pond slightly north of downtown Naples. The present -day Races continue this local tradition and feature ever more powerful and creative machines driven by drivers who are now members of an association and featured on various television Sports Channels. The Sable Palm Road/Rattlesnake Hammock area today is seeing increasing density of development with condominium communities and upscale single family home construction being created along the Collier Boulevard (State Road 95 1) corridor. 19 Methodology Prior to conducting fieldwork in the project parcel, relevant archives and literature were reviewed. This included, but was not limited to, studying previous archaeological reports for sites in Collier County, reviewing information from the Master Site File in Tallahassee concerning nearby sites, and examining USGS maps of the project area. Also, black and white and color aerial photographs from the project area, which could aid in revealing anthropogenic changes to the topography and floral communities, were interpreted. A site search made with the Department of Historic Resources indicated there were two previously - recorded sites in the project site. These were Hunting Camp Hammock, 8CR556 (a site previously recorded by Beriault and Strader) and the Silver Hard Hat Site, 8CR826 recorded by Christine Newman and Mary GIowacki during their survey of the Picayune Preserve. It has been determined that this latter site lies in a 20- acre out - parcel within the present parcel. Research Design This phase 1 archaeological survey of the Toll - Rattlesnake parcel incorporated the use of certain predictive models. These models are based on topographic and vegetative attributes that are associated with prehistoric and historic sites in southwestern Collier County. These models postulate that high ground live oak/tropical hardwood hammocks in close proximity to deep sloughs or marshes are high probability areas for prehistoric archaeological sites. The elevational information on the USGS Belle Meade and Belle Meade NW Quadrangle maps for the area also were used. It was determined that overall, the project parcel had a medium to high probability of containing archaeological sites because of its elevational variation, known sites in the area, as well as its proximity to Rattlesnake Hammock. The information and profiling of vegetative communities in the FLUCFCS map provided by project biologists Passarella and Associates, also was extensively used to locate and select targets for testing. Fieldwork Initial visual inspection of the subject parcel identified a wide range of topographic and vegetative features. A few areas of the parcel, particularly those closest to State Road 951 had been severely impacted by prior clearing, scraping and borrowing activities. Most of the invasive exotics such as meleleauca and brazillian pepper also are concentrated in dense stands in this westerly portion of the subject parcel. Areas to the east are largely unaltered woodland with the exception of a hunting camp and cleared fields in the southeastern portion of the parcel (Figure 2). Access to interior parts of the parcel consist of trails crisscrossing open cypress areas and densely vegetated pine islands. All parts of the parcel were assessed by windshield or pedestrian survey and any additional targets noted for further investigation. A total of thirty -six targets of possible archaeological sites was identified from aerial imagery and from FLUCFCS map designations and ground truthing. Chris Emblage of Passarella and Associates was 20 interviewed by AHC personnel and gave additional valuable information that led to the identification of several of the targets to be ground truthed. All thirty -six targets were visited in the field and decisions made as to whether to test them based on elevations, vegetation, and other elements associated with archaeological sites. Ninety -six shovel tests were dug as 45 cm squares to what was judged sterile zones, generally depths exceeding 50 centimeters. Systematic and judgmental shovel tests were dug in locations on twelve targets. All dug sediments were screened through %4" mesh hardware cloth and any material judged to be of archaeological significance was saved. All collected material was placed in sealable plastic bags and sent to the AHC lab in Davie for evaluation and conservation. All recovered material will repose at the Historical Museum of Southern Florida in Miami. Collections All recovered materials (FS 1 -18) were cleaned and quantified (Appendix 1). Informants Chris Cmblage of Passarella and Associates, project biologist, was interviewed in Fort Myers as part of this assessment. He identified several hammocks across the parcel that were visited and assessed. 21 RANGE 26E I RANGE uti.T�T \rya 0 TARGCT 4!6,�� TI xGEI a3 UWcT 451 SILVER I T:.RG£T O »�� 1 15719,20.21) (STi -418) 3 _13 4( TARGkT tQ TAR6`ETR�—`_ CLAMSHELL COPE MIDOEH, TnRC��i v3 (ST- 8,0,10) BCR878 \ ae O HUNUNG CAMP OE--- HAMMOCK, UMV 06 8CR666 (ST -7) TARGET at (ST- 22.23.2425) yQ TARGET tit , (ST- 11,12,13) 'tiff :c'i iti /I ST- 26.2"128) VA ITE SHELL 0 HAMMOCK SttE 8CR878 (ST-Z 1* 95) JOMP -START Q HAMMOCK TARGfrm SITE 8CR881 TARC£f GC —yY� TA'" (5724) OEEPMARSH TA.G'T ar -�� HAMOC MK TAAG t2D SITE, SCRUO ( (ST-Z') 57 - 8.6:67). TARG_R t5 (S762) TA RC-'RC_ (ST -63) (ST -4) "'+ O z cn 0 ! TI xGEI a3 UWcT 451 SILVER I HAROHAT .o—i!' E.TnPStT Gt SITE,SCR828 TACffT TC � /TgRGET i41 FSST 571 V UMV 06 ® •� / `- tARf.6T R] TTxGFT 456 M,t60S 15748.511 - -^^ 4 as (ST. I Figure 3. Map of the Toll - Rattlesnake parcel area shcuing uchaeologicA targets and sites - ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE = SELECTED TARGET TARGETS OF POTENTIAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES lk 14 i V � 1 i 112 1 ,iii BELLE Results and Conclusions This phase I assessment of the Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel resulted in the investigation of all parts of the parcel and the documentation of five prehistoric sites. A total of ninety -six test holes were dug across the parcel (Figure 3). One building, a modern hunting cabin, exists on the parcel that is less than fifty years old and is not historic. Recovered cultural materials from the parcel are characterized by both artifacts and ecofacts— specifically faunal bone, marine shell, and sand - tempered ceramics. One previously recorded site, 8CR556, the Hunting Camp Hammock, was assessed on the parcel. It is located in the mid - portion of the parcel. This site was reported twenty years ago by the present investigator Beriault. It was determined that an error of location had been made in the initial site form. The actual site location is approximately 900 feet southeast of the 1985 reported location, an error caused by confusion of the site with a small, discreet pine island (listed in the present report as Target #8 and determined to be a Iow probability area for archaeological remains). 8CR556 is located in a tropical hardwood hammock used as a modern hunting camp dating from circa 1970s. A shovel test in the central part of the site produced faunal bone and sand - tempered plain ceramics (FS 4). Four previously unrecorded archaeological sites also were recorded on the parcel. All are prehistoric camps or small villages used for habitation and subsistence activities. The Jump -Start Hammock Midden (8CR881) is characterized by a shallow concentration of faunal bone located on a small discreet tropical hardwood hammock with a near - surface limestone caprock substrate. The White Shell Hammock Site, 8CR879, located 1000 feet southeast of the Jump Start Hammock Site, is characterized as a faunal bone midden located on the north end of a very large live oak/cabbage palm hammock adjoining a deep slough to the south and west. A columella "chisel" made from a Busycon contrarium (lightning whelk) and faunal bone was recovered during testing of this site (Figure 7). The Deep Marsh Hammock Site (8CR880), located a little more than a quarter mile south of the White Shell Hammock Site, is situated in an ovoid cabbage palm hammock at the northern end of a tear -drop shaped deep marsh that is nearly permanently wet. No sand - tempered plain ceramic sherds were recovered from a shovel test in the easterly part of this site. The Clamshell Cove Midden Site (8CR878) is situated 1500 feet west - northwest of the Hunting Camp hammock Site and is an elevated, midden yielding marine shell, faunal bone and sand - tempered plain ceramics. The vegetation is diverse tropical hardwoods. A ceramic body sherd recovered from this site has linear abrasions or scratches, likely done after the vessel was broken, suggesting the sherd may have been used as a sharpening tool, possibly for bone pins (Figure 5). Considering the distance of the five sites from the coast, approximately 8 to 10 miles, it is possible that these sites were camps and stopping points along a principal canoe trail connecting the coast to the interior. The rich bio- diversity of the Rattlesnake Hammock area, suggests that it was a destination location over at least a thousand years for coastal 23 shell -mound Indians who traveled up interior river /slough systems to acquire needed resources. Very likely these Indians returned to the same locales seasonally over extended periods of time, maintaining camps and villages over the centuries. All five prehistoric archaeological sites (8CR556, 8CR878, 8CR879, 8CR880, 8CR881) are of local significance, and, based on criteria (d), for sites "that have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory," three are potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places based on available data. The well preserved faunal bone assemblage and shell found at 8CR556, 8CR878, and 8CR881 could provide important information regarding prehistoric subsistence patterns and habitats. Sites 8CR879 and 8CR880 appear to be small camps and are not eligible for listing on the National Register, based on available data. In addition to the five recorded sites on the subject parcel, there are three areas of possible archaeological concern (Figure 3). Target 13 lies in the northerly extension of the parcel. It is an elevated crescent shaped sand ridge flanked by marshes to the east and west. The vegetation on the ridge is characterized with large live oaks with saw palmetto understory. Azeas of the ridge are three feet higher than the surrounding country. Five shovel tests failed to reveal archaeological material, but the prominence of this anomalous feature and its advantageous situation suggests that a site could be associated with it. If the area is to be impacted by future development, then phase 2 testing should be done. Similarly, Targets 3 and 18 were also shovel tested without any archaeological material encountered. These three features will need additional archaeological investigations if they are to be impacted by future development. No human remains were recovered from any of the assessed sites. Midden graves are common in southern Florida, thus all of the sites have a medium to high potential of encompassing isolated human graves or cemeteries. If human remains are found, the provisions of Florida Statute 872.05, the Unmarked Human Graves Act, will apply. A site search with the Florida Department of Historic Resources indicated that the Silver Hard Hat Site, 8CR826 recorded by Christine Newman and Mary Glowacki during their 2001 survey of the Picayune Preserve might have been present on the subject parcel. It has been determined that this site lies in a 20 -acre out - parcel within the present parcel (Figure 3). 24 Summary of Sites Site Name: Hunting Camp Hammock State Site Number: 8CR556 Environmental Setting: Tropical hardwood hammock surrounded by low "hatrack" cypress Location: Range 26E, Township 50S, Section 13 Site Type: Midden Site Function: Habitation, resource extraction Description: The site is located on a tropical hardwood hammock island with a limestone base surrounded by low hatrack cypress. The site peaks at around two feet (+ 80 cm) above surrounding lowlands near the center of the hammock. Site size is about 150 feet in diameter (approximately 20,000 square feet). Modem trash indicates the site was used as a hunting camp circa 25 years ago. Prehistoric material recovered includes faunal bone and sand - tempered plain ceramics. The site is vegetated in cabbage palm, mature camphorwood, marlberry, myrsine, hog plum, wax myrtle, and red bay. Note that the location recorded in the 1985 site form is wrong and has been revised as a result of this assessment to about 900 feet from its previous reported position. Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades unspecified Collections: Faunal bone, ceramics, marine shell (FS 4) Previous Research: Strader, site file form, 1985 25 Preservation Quality: Good to excellent, a modern hunting camp has occupied the site, but with little apparent below- ground disturbance Ownership: Private Significance: Site is of local significance and is potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 26 Site Name: Clamshell Cove Midden State Site Number: 8CR878 Environmental Setting: A tropical hardwood hammock tree island surrounded by low cypress Location: Range 26E, Township 50S, Section 14 Site Type: Midden Site Function: Habitation, resource extraction Description: The site is characterized by an intensive midden deposit. It is located on a hardwood hammock island surrounded by acres of low cypress swamp. The site area is estimated to cover the entire hammock with the highest concentrations of cultural remains occurring near the center. Estimated site size is about 250 by 150 feet. Maximum elevation approaches three feet (80 -90 cm) above the surrounding cypress strands. The site is vegetated in a diverse tropical hardwood hammock which includes large gumbo limbos, very large mastics, satinleaf, marlberry, gulf gray twig, camphorwood, white stopper, hog plum, willow bUS(Ic, spanish stopper, myrsine, wild coffee, Pisonia aculeata, wild indigo, and other plants. The soil is a gray ashy midden. A total of three shovel tests revealed abundant faunal bone, sand - tempered plain ceramics, and marine shell consisting of venus clam, lightning whelk and Lucine. Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades 1, H Collections: Faunal bone, ceramics (22 STP), marine shell (FS 5 -8) Previous Research: None Preservation Quality: Good to excellent, the only disturbance noted was animal burrowing Ownership: Private Significance: Site is of local significance, and is potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 27 Figure; 4. View noc`khwest at tall gumbo 2imbos growing on Cluashell Cove Midden Site, 9CR979 Figure S. Abiaded sand - tempered Flair body sherd found at sufaee-level, ST-10, SCR878. This sherd may have been used, as an abrader for borne points- 2 SS Site Name: White Shell Hammock State Site Number: 8CR879 Environmental Setting: Large live oak/cabbage palm hammock situated northeast of a deep circular marsh Location: Range 26E, Township 50S, Section 25 Site Type: Midden Site Function: Habitation, resource extraction Description: This site as located on the northern end of a 2 to 3 acre hammock (Fig. 6). The topography at the north end of the hammock is moderately elevated, generally higher than the rest of the hammock. Estimated site size is 150 by 200 feet. Maximum elevation of the site is in the north - central part of the hammock at about 60 -70 em above surrounding cypress wetlands. Shovel testing recovered faunal bone and a shell "chisel" created from the columella of a lightning whelk (Fig. 7). This tool may have been used in woodworking. Further delineation at the site performed by Craig Weaver indicates distribution of material may be discrete and "spotty ". Phase 2 testing would be necessary to determine the site's exact extent and significance. A total of 10 test holes were dug here but only one was positive for cultural materials. Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades unspecified Collections: Faunal bone, shell tool (FS -2) Previous Research: None Preservation Quality: Very good to excellent, there seems to be little below - ground disturbance Ownership: Private Significance: The site is of at least local significance, but based on current data, is not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Phase 2 testing is recorrunended for a better determination of significance. 29 Figure 6. View east at White Shell Hammock containing the prehistoric site, 9CR879 .i Site Name: Deep Marsh Hammock State Site Number: 8CR880 Environmental Setting: Ovoid, slightly elevated cabbage palm hammock with deep . marsh lying to immediate south Location: Range 26E, Township 50S, Section 25 Site 'Type: Midden Site Function: Habitation, resource extraction (Description: The site is located in an elongate cabbage palm hammock that is located south of Sabal Palm Road at the north end of a deep tear drop shaped marsh. The marsh has a nearly year -round hydroperiod. The site size is estimated to include most of the hammock and measures approximately 150 by 200 feet. Maximum elevation is about 10 -20 inches (30 -40 cm) above the immediate surroundings. Testing included nine shovel tests of which one was positive. Sand - tempered plain ceramics were uncovered at a 20 -55 cm depth in the northern part of the hammock. These test results suggest sparse or discreet distribution of cultural material. Phase 2 testing will be necessary to determine the exact site extent and significance. Chronology. Prehistoric: Glades unspecified Collections: Sand- tempered plain ceramics (FS -3) Previous Research: None Preservation Quality: Very good to excellent, there is little below - ground disturbance Ownership: Private Significance: The site is of at least local significance, but based on available data, is not considered eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, although Phase 2 testing could change that assessment. 31 Y 1- Figure 8. Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 8CR880, showing location of shoves tests. = POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST Z a = NEGATIVE- SHOVEL TEST ❑ = PINFLAGGED BOUNDARY POINT = SITE BOUNDARY = GENERAL EXTENT OF HAMMOCK fl �0 1GUF�faW' 3 2 r 'Jt O It rl E+ 'p �o 1 t t rt 1 1 t s 1 1 h in 1 s t l 1 t 1 1 1 l n 1 JtO t 1 / 1 1 I 1 k Vr { .O t 1 1 t t �O { 1 1 { Y 1 i1 O i H i t 1 1 v. 1 s n 1 i1 ss v tvt vv Figure 8. Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 8CR880, showing location of shoves tests. = POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST Z a = NEGATIVE- SHOVEL TEST ❑ = PINFLAGGED BOUNDARY POINT = SITE BOUNDARY = GENERAL EXTENT OF HAMMOCK fl �0 1GUF�faW' 3 2 'l J AO v � Figure 8. Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 8CR880, showing location of shoves tests. = POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST Z a = NEGATIVE- SHOVEL TEST ❑ = PINFLAGGED BOUNDARY POINT = SITE BOUNDARY = GENERAL EXTENT OF HAMMOCK fl �0 1GUF�faW' 3 2 v � rt 1 t s 1 s t 1 n NO JtO 1 / I Vr •nom .O 1 t t �O it Y 11 Ir O � t r� H t t v. n v O Ir. f N O J� Figure 8. Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 8CR880, showing location of shoves tests. = POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST Z a = NEGATIVE- SHOVEL TEST ❑ = PINFLAGGED BOUNDARY POINT = SITE BOUNDARY = GENERAL EXTENT OF HAMMOCK fl �0 1GUF�faW' 3 2 Figure g. drew Fiord. Vegetation in pond apple swamp south of Deep Marsh ffmiimock Site, 8CR.880 Figure 10. View north. Gene Edaveo sifts material from Shovel lest b in Deep Marsh H&-nmock, 8CR880 Site Name: Jump -Start Hammock State Site Number: 8CR881 Location: Range 26E, Township 505, Section 25 Site Type: Midden Site Function: Habitation, resource extraction Description: Estimated site size is about 150 feet (50 meters) in diameter. Elevation slopes upward from the surrounding cypress strand and peaks near the west- central part of the site at about + 70 cm. This site consists of a moderate quantity of faunal bone encountered at 20 -65 cm. depth. The faunal bone is from turtle and other species. Also recovered was marine shell that includes lightning whelk and kings crown. The tropical hammock has areas of coppiced hardwoods such as camphorwood that may be indicants of areas of midden intensity. Systematic testing there indicates extensive faunal bone with 31 sand - tempered plain ceramic sherds indicating a Formative period component to the site. Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades unspecified Collections: Faunal bone, possible bone pin, marine shell, 31 sand - tempered plain pottery (FS -1, 9 -18) Previous Research: None Preservation Quality: Very good to excellent, some surface trash indicates use of the hammock as a modem hunting camp, but there seems to be little below - ground disturbance Ownership: Private Significance: The site is of at least local significance, and is potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. 34 Ole 4-4 6' ST4o 4 W. t 71 bA U � � g 3 v ST44 m J7 ST43 ST46 .x ST36 Figure i 1.. timpstut i-fapi -hock Siie, 8CR831, snowing location of shovel tests, site and buffer boundaries. = POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST }�� = NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST ' `� j = PINFLAGGED BOUI\DARY POINT' -SITE BOUNDARIES 0 25 50 100 Feet appfox. 35 Figure 12_ View west. Gene Er aver sifts Shovel Vest 1 in Jump -Start Hammock Site, SCR881 Fig i-e 13. View northeast at deep pond apple slough sovitheast of the Jump -Stet Hammock Site. This was tlae likely water so -urce for the site. Recommendations The archeological assessment of the Toll- Rattlesnake Parcel resulted in the documentation of five prehistoric archaeological sites: the Hunting Camp Site, 8CR556, the Clamshell Cove Midden Site, 8CR878, the White Shell Hammock Site, 8CR879, the Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 8CR880, and the Jump -Start Hammock Midden, 8CR881. All five sites provide evidence of prehistoric habitation typical of small camps or villages. All five sites should be considered for preservation as green space areas, if feasible. If preservation of all or parts of the sites are not feasible, then additional archaeological investigations should be conducted to further document and mitigate these sites to offset any possible adverse impacts to these sites from clearing and development. If any or all of the sites are set aside as a green space preservation, then the following guidelines should be considered: • Prior to any clearing or grubbing activities within 200 feet of the site, a temporary construction fence should be placed around the site. ® Any clearing of the site (i.e. removal of exotic vegetation) will need to be conducted by hand. No equipment should be used to clear the site or remove _. _ -- -debris from the site area. All clearing, grubbing, and subsurface alterations (i.e. utility ditches, roads, planting) within 200 feet of the site should be subject to archaeological monitoring. No storage of fill, equipment, or supplies should be placed within the site preservation area. • Any landscaping of an archaeological preservation area should be coordinated with the archaeologist. Three other hammocks, Targets 3, 13 and 18 (Figure 3), are considered possible archaeological sites. Even though our testing on those targets uncovered no artifacts or cultural material, the features are consistent with other archaeological sites in the area. If future development grubbing, scraping or clearing is proposed for these three areas, then a Phase 2 assessment of the affected targets should be conducted. It should be noted that cypress solution ponds have the potential of yielding Archaic Period human burials as similar features in the area have been used as mortuary ponds (Beriault et al., 1981:57). The difficulty of adequately testing these features in a Phase 1 survey should be considered in the event that subsequent development proposes demucking these features. In this event, a plan should be in place to allow for monitoring by archaeologist of any pond related demucking. Particular attention should be provided to the possibility that human graves could be associated with any of these sites, particularly where midden deposits are relatively deep. If human remains are encountered, the provisions for Florida Statue, 872.05, the Unmarked Human Graves Act shall apply. 37 Although a thorough and systematic effort was made to document sites on the parcel, there is still the potential of other archaeological sites, features, or a existing and should subsequent development reveal this, efforts should be rr protect or document these resources, and if human provisions of Florida Statute 872.05 will apply. W., remains are encountered then the References Cited Allerton, D and RS Carr 1988 An Archaeological Survey of the Shell Big Cypress Seismic Project (DNR permit G81486). Manuscript on file, Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Florida. 1990 An Archaeological and Historical Assessment of the Goodland Marina Project Tract, Collier County. Conducted for Coastal Engineering Consultants. Almy, MM and JG Deming 1982 Cultural Resources Survey of the Emerald Lakes Tract in Northwest Collier County, Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. FMSF #902. 1986a Archaeological Assessment Survey of Twelve Lakes, Collier County, Florida. Archaeological Consultants inc., Sarasota. 1986b Archaeological Assessment of Bretonne Park, Collier County, Florida Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. 1986c Archaeological Assessment of City Gate Commercial Park, Collier County, Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. 1987 Archaeological Assessment Survey of Designated Potions of the Woodlands in Collier County, Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. Athens, WP 1983 the ,Spatial Distribution of Glades Period ,Sites within the Big Cypress National Preserve, Florida. Masters thesis on file, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida. Beriault, JG 1973 A Preliminary Deport on the Area Known as the Collier - Coral Ridge Tract, Southwest Florida. Unpublished Ms, on file at FMSF, Tallahassee and AHC, Miami. 1982 A Preliminary Report on Stratigraphic Excavations at Addison Key, Collier County, Florida. Unfinished MS. 1986 Report and Recommendations Concerning the Barron Collier Company Tract on Chokoloskee Island, Collier County, Florida, MS on file, AHC. 1987 Suggestions for a Collier County site Model, a report submitted to the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, December 15th, 1987. MS on file, AHC. 1998 An Archaeological Survey of the Standerfer Parcel, Lee County, Florida. AHC Technical Report #226 Beriault, JG, RS Carr, J Stipp, R Johnson, and J Meeder 1981 The Archaeological Salvage of the Bay West Site, Collier County, Florida. In Florida Anthropologist 34(20):39 -58. Beriault, JG and RS Carr 1998 An Archaeological Survey of the Minding Cypress Parcel, Collier County, FL. AHC Technical Report #221. Beriault, JG and C Strader 1984 A Preliminary Report on Stratigraphic Excavation on Chokoloskee Island, Florida. Southwest Florida Archaeological Society, MS on file, AHC. Bullen, RP and AK Bullen 1956 Excavation on Cape Haze Peninsula, Florida. Contributions of the Florida State Museum. Social Sciences 1, Gainesville, Florida. Carbone, VA 1983 Late Quaternary Environments in Florida and the Southeast_ The Flow Anthropologist 36:3 -17. Carr, RS 1986 preliminary Deport on Excavations at the Cutler Fossil Site (SDA2001) in Southern Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 39:231 -232. 1989 An Archaeological and Historical Survey of Part of the Williamson Property, Collier County, Florida. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Miami. FMSF 2458. Carr, RS and D Allerton 1988a An Archaeological Survey of North Keewaydin Island, Collier County, Florida. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Miami, Florida. 1988b An Archaeological and Historical Assessment of the Goodland Marina Project Tract, Collier County, Florida. MS on file, Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Miami, Florida. Carr, RS and JG Beriault 1984 Prehistoric Man In South Florida. In PJ Gleason (ed), Environments of South Florida: Present andPast ff Coral Gables: Marm Geological Society, FL. pp. 1 -14. Carr, RS and K Heinz 1996 Archaeological Excavations at the Ryder Pond Site, 9LLI850, Lee County, FL. April, 1986. Carr, RS and W Steele 1993 An Archaeological Survey and Assessment of the Lely resort Properties, Collier County, FL, AHC Technical Report # 70. EM Carr, RS, W Steele and J Davis 1994a A Phase I Archaeological and Historical Assessment of the Piper Tract, Collier County, Florida. April, 1994. 1994b A Phase H Archaeological and Historical Assessment of the Piper Tract, Collier County, Florida. June, 1994. Clausen, C and J Gifford 1975 Florida spring confirmed as 10,000 year old early man site. The Florida Anthropologist 8 (3), Part 2. Cockrell, WA 1970 Glades I and Pre - Glades Settlement and Subsistence Patterns on Marco Island (Collier County, Florida). M.A. thesis of file, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida. Cockrell, VIVA and L Murphy 1978 Pleistocene Man in Florida. Archaeology of Eastern North America Vol. 6. Newark, Delaware: Eastern States Archaeological Federation. Cushing, FH 1897 Exploration of Ancient Ivey- Dwellers' Remains on the Gulf Coast of Florida. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia 35 (153): 1- 329-448. Daniel, RI and M Wisenbaker 1987 Harney Flats. Baywood Publishing Company, Farmingdale, New York. Delcourt, PA and HR Delcourt 1981 Vegetation Maps for Eastern North America: 40,000 Years B.P. to Present. In R.C. Romans (editor) Geobotanyll. New York: ®lenum Publishing Press. Deming, JG and M Mmy 1987 A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Audubon Country Club Tract in Northwest Collier County, Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota, Florida. FMSF 1487. 1988 Mitigative Excavation at Selected Portions of Site Complex 8CR860 in Northwest Collier County, Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota, Florida. FMSF 1813. Dickel, D and RS Carr 1992 Archaeological Investigations at Bonita Bay Properties, Phase U. Lee County, FL, AHC Technical Report # 49. Douglass, AE 1885 Ancient Canals on the South -west Coast ofFlorida. AmeriemAntiguaim 7.227 -285. 1890 Mounds in Florida. American Antiquarian 12:105 -107. M] Dun - ford, CD 1895 The discovery of aboriginal netting, rope, and wood implements in a muck deposit in crest Florida. American Naturalist 29: 1032 -1039. Eck, CR 1997 An Archaeological Survey of the Pembroke Center Parcel DRJ, Broward County, Florida. AHC Technical Report #198. Ehrenhard, JE, RS Carr, and RC Taylor 1978 The Archaeological Survey o, j`' Big- Cypress !National Preserve: Phase L stational Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. 1979 The rig Cypress National Preserve: Archaeological Survey Season 2, National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. Ehrenhard, JE and RC Taylor 1980 The Big Cypress National Preserve: Archaeological Survey Season 3. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. Ehrenhard, JE, RC Taylor, and G Komara 1980 Big Cypress National Preserve Cultural Resource Inventory Season 4. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. Fay, P and RS Carr 1990 An Archaeological !Review Of select Sites of Impact in the !National Panther Refuge, Collier County, Florida. AHC Technical Report #22. Fradkin, A 1976 The VWightman Site: A.Study of Prehistoric Culture and Environment on Sanibel Island, Lee County, Florida. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville. Fuhrmeister, C, RJ Austin, and H Hansen 1990 Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Collier Tract 22 Development Site, Collier County, Florida. Piper Archaeological Research Inc. St. Petersburg, Florida. FMSF 2423, Goggin, JM 1939 A Ceramic Sequence in South Florida. New Mexico Anthropologist 3:3640. 1940 The distribution of pottery wares in the Glades Archaeological Area of South Florida. New Mexico Anthropologist 4:22 -33. 1947 A Preliminary Definition of Archaeological areas and Periods in Florida. American Antiquity 13:114-127, 1949& Cultural Occupation at Goodland Point, Florida. R e Florida Anthropologist 2(3- 4): 65 -91. 42 Goggin, JM (cunt.) 1949b The Archaeology of the Glades Area, Unpublished MS on file, SE Archaeological Research Center, NPS, Tallahassee, Fl. 1949c Cultural Traditions in Florida Prehistory. In J.W. Griffin (editor) The Florida Indian and his Neighbors. Winter Park, Florida: Rollins College. Goggin, JM and WC Sturtevant 1964 The Calusa: A Stratified, Nonagricultural Society (with notes on sibling marriage). In W Goodenough (editor) Explorations in Cultural Anthropology: E% ys in Honor ofGwTe PeterAlwdock Nm York- MXkaw Hill. Pp. 179 -291. Griffin, JW 1974 Archaeology and Environment in South Florida. In P.J. Gleason (ed.), Environments of South Florida: Present and Past II. Coral Gables: Mami Geological Society, pp 342 -346. 1988 The .Archaeology of Everglades National Park: A Synthesis. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. Hrdli8ka, A 1922 The Anthropology of Florida. Deland, Florida: Publications of the Florida State Historical Society I. Kenworthy, CJ 1883 Ancient Canals in Florida. Smithsonian Institution Annual Deport for 1881: 105 -109. Kroeber, AL 1939 Cultural and Natural Areas in Native North America. Berkeley: University of California Press. Laxson, DD 1966 The Turner River Jungle Gardens Site, Collier County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 19: 125 -140. Lee, AR, JG Beriault, W Buschelman, J Belknap 1993 A Small Site - Mulberry Midden, 8CR697 - Contributes to Knowledge of the Transitional Period. The Florida Anthropologist 46:43 -52. Lee, AID, JG Beriault, J Belknap, WM Buschelman, AL Snapp and JW Thompson 1997 Salvage Excavation of an Archaic Period Special- Purpose Site in Collier County, The Florida Anthropologist 50 :11 -24. 1988 Heineken Hammock, 8CR231: A Late Archaic Corridor Site in Collier County. Southwest Florida Archaeological Society. Naples, Florida. 43 McNfichaels, A 1982 A Cultural Resource Assessment of Horrs Island, Collier County, Florida. MA thesis, Depar went of Anthropology University of Florida, Gainesville. Marquardt, NTH 1984 The .dosslyn Island Mound and its Role in the Investigation of Southwest Florida's Past Gainesville: Florida State Museu M. Department of Anthropology, Miscellaneous Project Report Series 22. 1987 The Calusa Social Formation in Protohistoric South Florida. In T.C. Patterson and C.W. Gailey (editors) Power Relations and State Formation. Washington, D.C.: Archaeology Section, American Anthropological Association, pp. 98 -116. 1988 Politics and Production Among the Calusa of South Florida. In T. Ingold, D. Riches, and J. Woodburn (editors) Hunters and Gatherers 1: History, Evolution, acrd Social Change. London: Berg Publishers, pp. 161 -188. 1992 Recent Archaeological and Daleoenvironmental Investigations in Southwest Florida. M W.H. Marquardt (editor), Culture and Environment in the Domain of the Calusa. Gainesville-. Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies. Monograph 1, University of Florida, pp. 9 -58. Martinez, C 1977 Archaeological and Historical Survey and Assessment of the Proposed Collier County 201 Waste Water Management Facilities, Collier County, Florida. Russell & Axon Inc. and Smally, Wel %rd & Nalven Inc. FMSF #257. Milanich, JT 1994 Archaeology of Precolymbian Florida. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. N ilanich 3'T, J Chapman, AS Cordell, S Hale, and R Merrinan 1984- Prehistoric Development of Calusa Society in Southwest Florida: Excavation on Useppa Island. In D.D. Davis (editor) Perspectives on Guff Coast Prehistory. Gainesville: University Dresses of Florida, pp. 258 -314. Milanich, .1T. and CH Fairbanks 1980 Florida Archaeology. New York: Academic Press. Miller, JJ and ML Fryman 1978 An Archaeological and Iistorical Survey of the Collier Bay Tract, Marco Island. Cultural Resource Management Inc., Tallahassee, Florida.. FMSF #3124. Moore, CB 1900 Certain Antiquities of the Florida Test Coast. Journal of the Aca&my of Nwur®al Science, Philadelphia 11:369 -394. 1905 Miscellaneous Investigations in Florida. Journal of the Academy of Nalural Science, Philadelphia 13:299 -325. 44 Moore, CB (cont.) 1907 Notes on the Ten Thousand Islands. Journal of the Academy of Natural Science, Philadelphia 13:458 -470. Morrell, RL 1967 Florida site form for site 8CR107. 1969 Fiber - tempered Pottery from Southwestern Florida. Abstract of presented paper, American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, on file at AHC. Russo, M 1990 Report I on Archaeological Investigations by the Florida Museum of Natural History at Horrs Island, Collier County, Florida. FMSF 2353. Scholl, DW, FC Craighead, and M Stuiver 1969 Florida Submergence Curve Revisited: Its Relation to Coastal Sedimentation Rates. Science 163: 562 -564. Sears, WH 1956 The Turner River Site, Collier County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 9(2):47 -60. 1966 Everglades National Park Archaeological Base Mapping Part I. Unpublished, FMSF MS# 1009. 1967 Archaeological. Survey of the Cape Coral Area at the Mouth of the Caloosahatchee River. The Florida Anthropologist 20: 93 -102. 1982 Fort Center: An Archaeological Site in the Lake Okeechobee Basin. Gainesville: University of Florida Press. Simons, MH 1884 Shell Heaps in Charlotte Harbor, Florida. Smithsonian Institution Annual Report for 1882: 794 -796. Stirling, MW 1931 Mounds of the Vanished Calusa Indians of Florida. Smithsonian Institution Explorations and Field Work for 1930: 167 -172. 1933 Report of the Chief. Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Report 48:3 -21. 1936 Florida Cultural Affiliations in Relation to Adjacent Areas. In Essays in Anthropology in Honor of Alfred Louis Kroeber. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp 351 -357. 45 Swift -, A and RS Carr 1959 An Archaeological Survey of Caxambas ]Instates, Collier County, Florida. Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Miami, FL. AHC Technical Report # 13. Taylor, RC 1954 Everglades National Park Archaeological inventory and assessment Season 2: interim Report. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. 1955 Everglades National Park Archaeological inventory and Assessment Season 3: Interim Report. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. Taylor, RC and G Romara 1953 Big Cypress Preserve Archaeological Survey: Season 5. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee, Florida. Van Beck, JC and LM Van Beck 1965 The Marco Midden, Marco Island, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 16:1.20. Widmer, RJ 1974 A Survey and Assessment of Archaeological Resources on Marco Island, Collier County, Florida. Ms on file, FMSF #265. 1953 The Evolution of the Calusa, a Non - agricultural Chiefdom on the Southwest Florida Coast. Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, distributed by University microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 1996 Decent Excavations at the Key Asarco Site, SCR45, Collier County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 49:10 -26. Williams, JL 1537 The Territory of Florida. Gainesville: University Dress of Florida. Appendix 1. Feathers Parcel General Field Specimen Log FS Site ## Provenience Depth Description Collector Hate Collected I 8CR881 ST 1, 20 -65 Shell (61.2g), JB,GE 1/15/04 Target I cm faunal bone (10.1 g), (Jump -Start charcoal (0.4g), Hammock wood (1.2g), Site Root mold (7 c. 2 8CR879 ST 2, 0 -15 Faunal bone (3.5g), JB,GE 1 /15 /04 Target 2 cm lightning whelk columella (White Shell chisel Hammock Site 3 8CR880 ST 6, 20 -55 Sand- tempered plain JB,GE 1/15/03 Target 6 cm ceramics (9 pc.), (Deep Marsh charcoal (0.1 g) Hammock Site 4 8CR556 ST 7, 10 -30 Sand - tempered ceramics (3 JB,GE I /16/04 Target 10 cm pc.), (Hunting faunal bone (1.6g), Camp marine shell (3.0g) Hammock) 5 8CR878 ST 8, Target 0 -20 1 pc. clam shell (11.4g) JB,GE i/16/04 11 cm (Clamshell Cove Midden 6 8CR878 Surface- 0 cm Whole clamshell half -shell JB,GE 1116/04 collected in (138.3g) eastern portion of Clamshell Cove Midden 7 8CR878 ST -9, Target 0 -35 1 pc. wood JB,GE 1116/04 11 cm (Clamshell Cove Midden 8 8CR878 ST 10 0 -35 Faunal bone (2.3g), JB, GE 1/16/04 cm sand - tempered plain ceramics (22 pc., 3 rims), marine shell (47,48), mar] rock (1 c.) 47 Appeudiz 2. Site C11 8111, dump Start Hammock, Field Specimmeu Log >FS# Shovel Test # Leve I Depth (cmbs Description Coolecctor � Date 9 32 1 0 -18 sand - tempered plain ceramic body sherd (1) RP/SF 10/18/ 05 raccoon teeth (3) includes 2 molars, 1 premolar faunal bone (... g total, ... g burnt) includes snake, turtle shell (... g total, ... g burnt) includes clam snail .. 10 32 2 18 -60 sand- tempered plain ceramic body sherds 2 RP /Sp 10/18/ 05 faunal bone (... g total, ... g burnt) includes turtle shell . , includes clam snail . 11 33 1 0 -50 sand- tempered plain ceramic body sherds (9 ) Cw 10/18/ 05 faunal bone (... g total, ... g burnt) includes turtle, snake faunal teeth 1 deer, 1 stingray) shell . . charcoal .. - ) burnt seeds 3 12 34 1 0 -50 faunal bone (... g total, . , . g burnt) includes snake, turtle RP/SF 10/18/ 05 seeds (2 13 37 1 0 -50 faunal bone (...g total, ...g burnt) includes snake, turtle Cw 10/19/ 05 charcoal . 14 38 1 0 -20 sand- tempered plain ceramic body sherds (2) RP/SF 10/19/ 05 faunal bone .. shell (....g) includes clam, oyster snail .. fish otolith (1 1S 38 2 20 -70 sand - tempered plain ceramic body sherds 8 Imo' /SF 10/19/ 05 faunal bone (...g) includes snake, turtle shell ... g includes conch, clam ;,, Site 8CR881 (Jump -start Hammock) *CW =Craig Weaver, RP =Revs Pidgeon, SF =Scott Faulkner snail ... ) charcoal (... ) 1� 39 2 20 -70 sand - tempered plain ceramic body sherds 4 RP /SF 10/19/ 05 faunal bone (... g) includes deer, turtle faunal teeth (7 deer shell (...g total, ...g burnt) conch, clam snail . 17 41 1 0 -15 faunal bone (...g) includes turtle RP /SF 10/19/ 05 is 42 1 0 -40 sand - tempered plain ceramic body sherds 5 CW 10/191 05 faunal bone (... g total, ... g burnt) includes turtle shell (...g) includes oyster charcoal . burnt seeds 2) Site 8CR881 (Jump -start Hammock) *CW =Craig Weaver, RP =Revs Pidgeon, SF =Scott Faulkner Appendix 3: Toll- Rattlesnake Parcei Shovel 'Vest and Target Log John Beriault, Gene Edavec — 1 -15 -04 to 1 -22 -04 STl (45 cm x 45 cm) Positive. Dug in west - central area of Target #1 (Jump -Start Hammock Midden (CR881) near highest point of hammock 0 -20 cm Silty black viscous soil, large lateral roots 20 -50cm Silty black soil, fewer roots, abundant faunal bone, turtle bone, possible bone pin, marine shell (whelk and kings crown) (FS -1) 50 -65cm Soil is grayer, marlier, still some faunal bone, marine shell, root casts 65cm Limestone caprock ST2 (4.5cm x 45 em) Positive. On north end of Target #2, a prominent live oak cabbage palm hammock (White Shell Hammock Site, 8CR879) 0 -15 cm Black silty soil, faunal bone, whelk columella chisel (FS -2) 15cm Limestone caprock ST3 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 250 feet south of ST2 near south end of hammock island near highest ground 0 -20cm Black silty soil 20 -25cm Chalky, unconsolidated limestone marl ST4 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. In northeast- center of Target #3, an elevated crescent - shaped area of scattered large live oaks in the extreme southern portion of the parcel 0 -35cm Gray sand 35 -55cm Brown hardpan sand 55cm Limestone caprock and loose Pleistocene Chione cancellata shells ST5 (45cm x 45 em) Negative. in west - central portion of Target #4, a round, elevated live oak, saw palmetto hammock in a deep cypress slough in the extreme southeastern corner of the subject parcel 0 -15cm Dark gray sand 15 -55cm Medium gray sand 55 -75cm Light gray sand Target #5 is a small circular to ovoid higher ground area vegetated in 8 -foot high saw palmettos, dahoon holly, wax myrtle, elevated +20 cm. higher than the surrounding cypress slough. The feature was judged to have minimal archaeological potential and was not shovel tested. ST6 (45cm x 45 cm) Positive. In Target #6 (now called the Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 8CR880), a moderately elevated cabbage palm hammock situated immediately north of a very deep teardrop - shaped marsh pond in the southeastern corner of the parcel. Shovel test placed in southeast - central part of target. 0 -20cm Black silty soil 50 20 -55cm Light grayish -black soil, moderate quantity of Sand - tempered plain ceramics (FS-3) 55 -70cm Lighter gray sand Target #7 is a poorly defined higher ground area vegetated in cabbage palm, dahoon holly, slash pine, and fern in the northern portion of the subject parcel. The FLUCFLS designation suggested the area could be a viable target but ground truthing determined that the target to be of minimal potential, and it was not shovel tested. Target #8 lies 600 feet SSE of Target #7 and proved to be a very prominent ovoid formation of cabbage palms, emerging slash pine, and tall dahoon holly. The target lies immediately west of a prominent sand trail visible on aerial photographs. The low elevation and vegetative makeup suggested the feature was of minimal archaeological significance and thus it was not tested. The UTM coordinates of this feature were erroneously given as those for the Hunting Camp Hammock Site in 1985. The actual site lies about 900 feet SW of this feature. Target #9 is a tight circular cluster of very tall cabbage palms situated 150 feet NNW of the intersection of two prominent trails in the northern portion of the subject parcel. The elevation of this feature is low and did not suggest a significant area and so was not shovel tested. ST7 (45cm x 45 cm) Positive. In Target #10 (the Hunting Camp Hammock Site, 8CR556), an elevated circular hammock island about 80+ cm. higher than the surrounding open cypress area. The site is approximately 300 yards SW of the position indicated in the 1985 site form filed by this investigator. Shovel Test is placed in the west - central portion of the site area. 0 -10cm Silty black soil 10 -30cm Silty black soil becoming grayer with depth 9increasing concentration of limestone marl), faunal bone, marine shell, thin STP ceramics (M4) 30em Marry, ashy- looking chalky limestone STS (45cm x 45 cm) Positive. In Target 411 (now called the Clamshell Cove Midden, 8CR000), a ovoid, high - elevation anomaly vegetated in a diverse tropical hardwood hammock. Elevation is 80+ cm. above surrounding open cypress area. Shovel test is in the southwestern- central area of the feature. 0 -20cm Mack silty soil, 1 pc. of clamshell (FS -5) 20cm Chalky, marly limestone caprock Note: FS -6 is a whole half -shell from a venus clam (Mercenat-ia campechiensis) surface - collected 8 meters east of ST8. ST9 (45cm x 45 cm) Positive. As above, but 10 meters northwest in northwestern quadrant of site area 0 -35cm Black silty soil, one fragment faunal bone (FS -7) 35cm Chalky, marly limestone 51 ST1O (45cm x 45 cm) Positive. 6 meters NE of ST8 near center of site area 0 -35cm Dark black silty soil, abundant STP ceramics, including one sherd with cross - hatched, after - the -fact etching; that may represent wear from sharpening bone pins, Spisuda and clam shell, and faunal bone (FS-8) 35cm Limestone caprock ST1I (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. In Target ##12 an ovoid to slightly crescent - shaped cabbage palm/live oak/slash pine island SE of the bend in the road leading into the Florida Sports Park in the northwest part of the subject parcel. Shovel test is in SW quadrant of this feature near abrupt drop -off into former cypress areas to the southwest. 0 -15cm Black silty soil 15cm Chalky, ashy limestone ST12 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 20 meters east of ST 11. 0 -10cm Marty gray soil 10cm Chalky, ashy limestone caprock ST13 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 15 meters NE of ST 12 0 -20cm Marty gray soil 20cm Chalky, ashy limestone caprock ST14 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. In Target a#13, a crescent- shaped, elevated sand ridge vegetated in live oak with a saw palmetto understory situated between two flanking marshes in the northerly extension of the subject parcel. Shovel test is in the north- central portion of the ridge on the highest ground closest to both marshes 0 -45cm Gray sand, at 30 cm. depth are bits of compressed clayey loam initially thought to be ceramics but determined to be natural. 45cm Lard dense tarry, brownish -black hardpan soil ST15 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above but 5 meters south of ST14 0 -55cm Gray sand 55cm Tarry, blackish -brown hardpan ST16 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 8 meters NE of ST14 on eastern slope of ridge as it drops to eastern marsh. 0 -45cm Garay sand 45cm grown hardpan sand ST17 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 16 meters south of ST 15 0 -50cm Gray sand 50cm Dark brown hardpan STIO (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 20 meters SE of ST 17 in eastern part of ridge 0 -60cm Gray sand WA 60cm Dense brown hardpan ST19 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. In Target 14, a crescent - shaped higher ground oak hammock area 300 yards east of Target 13 on the eastern edge of the eastern marsh. Shovel Test is in a circular high area in the southerly portion of this feature. 0 -50crn Gray sand 50cm Dark brown hardpan sand ST20 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. In area of Target 14 to the north 250 feet of ST 19 in a moderately diverse hardwood coppice which includes mature camphorwood 040cm .Dark black silty soil 40 -60cm Admixture of dark silty soil with brown hardpan 60cm Increasing concentration of brown hardpan ST21 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 4 meters east of ST20 0 -45cm lark black silty soil 45 -50cm Soil lightens to dark tannish -brown Target #15 is a cabbage palm/ slash pine area on only moderately elevated ground to the north of a very deep slough in the extreme northwesterly portion of the northern extension of the subject parcel. The area was visually examined but it was decided the Target had low probability of archaeological remains and was not shovel tested. Target #16 is a circular to ovoid slash pine island with cabbage palms and limited tropical elements such as myrsine and with a dense saw palmetto understory. There is abundant remains of recent refuse including an old metal bunk bed, timbers and galvanized roofing suggesting a modern hunting camp may have occupied the feature. The area was examined but was not considered archaeologically significant and was not shovel tested. Target #I7 is an area of moderately dense and emerging cabbage palms in the southern portion of the northern extension of the subject parcel. The area shows no sign of topographic variation, is not close to deep marshes or other water sources, and contains few tropical hardwood elements. It was judged not archaeologically significant and was not shovel tested ST22 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative, In Target # 18, an elevated bedrock "unconformity, circular in shape and vegetated in a limited tropical hardwood hammock which includes red bay, myrsine, white indigo berry, wax myrtle, live oak with a dense boston fern understory. The feature, surrounded by a low area now vegetated in dense meleleauca is approximately 80+ cm higher than the surroundings. Decent refuse indicates the area may have been camped upon in modern tunes. Shovel test is in west-central portion of feature. 0 -20cm Mack silty soil 20cm Chalky limestone caprock ST23 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 4 meters 1�rE of ST22 53 0 -20cm Silty black soil 20cm Chalky limestone caprock 35 -45cm hTegulat• linaestone caprock ST24 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative, As above, but 4 meters NNE of ST23 0-15cm Black silty soil 15cm Chalky limestone caprock S`1!°25 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 6 meters west of ST24 in NW quadrant of target 0 -25cm Black silty soil 25cm Increasing chalky limestone caprock ST26 (45cm x 45 cm) Negative. In Target #19 an elevated live oak/cabbage palm hammock feature 500 yards Nt1g1' of the north end of Brandy Lane. Shovel test is in the east- central portion of target. 0 -20cm bark gray sand 20 -45cm Brown sand, one 1 -cm. quartz pebble, likely bird crop stone @ 25 can. depth (not collected) 25 -45cm Irregular solutioned limestone caprock ST27 (45cm x 45 can) Negative. As above, but 8 meters NNW of ST26, just south of the sand trail crossing the target. 0 -30cm Grayish -brown sand 30cm Marty limestone caprock ST28 (45etu a 45 cm) Negative. As above, but 8 meters north of ST27, just north of the sand trail crossing the target. 0-45cm Grayish brown sand 3045cm Irregular limestone caprock Feathers 2 Parcel Shovel Test and Target Log as Compiled by Craig Weaver beginning October l x, 2005 October 18 -21, 2005 - Crew: Craig Weaver, Scott Faulkner, Reve Pidgeon December 5 -9, 13, 2005 Crew - Craig Weaver, Jarrod Haymon Jump -start Hammock Site (SCR881), Target ##1 is a tropical hardwood hammock with diversified vegetation, including sabal palms, live oaks, camphorwood, wild coffee, myrsine, etc. One shovel test from 2004 investigations (ST -1) was relocated, and the site was delineated by shovel testing N -S and E -W transects centered on ST =1 Bight shovel tests were positive and seven were negative for cultural materials. lain flags mark the shovel test locations. See the Field Specimen Log for details on artifacts and eeofacts (ceramic potsherds, faunal bone, faunal teeth, shell, charcoal, etc.) frown the positive shovel tests. The hammock was investigated on October 18 -19, 2005. 54 Whiteshelg Hammock Site (8CR879), Target #2 from 2004 investigations, is a tropical hardwood hammock with diversified vegetation, including sabal palms, live oaks, camphorwood, ferns, wild coffee, myrsine, etc. One shovel test from 2004 investigations (ST -2, at the north end of the hammock) was positive for cultural materials, but its location could not be relocated. N -S and E -W transects were set up across the hammock, and 17 shovel tests (ST52 through ST60, and ST88 through ST95) were excavated. ]However, all 17 tests were negative for cultural materials, preventing delineation of the site and the flagging of its boundaries, lain flags mark the shovel test locations. The hammock was investigated on October 21 and December 8, 2005 Deep Marsh Hammock Site (8CR880), Target #6 from 2004 investigations, is a tropical hardwood hammock with diversified vegetation, including sabal palms, Iive oaks, camphorwood, ferns, wild coffee, myrsine, etc. One shovel test from 2004 investigations (ST -6, at the NE end of the hammock) was positive for cultural materials. The location of ST6 was not immediately relocated, but eventually was. N -S and E -W transects were set up across the hammock, and 24 shovel tests (ST64 through ST87) were excavated. While all 24 shovel tests were negative for cultural materials, those centered on ST6 allowed for delineation of the site. Once delineated, flagging in trees and pin flags in the ground mark the perimeter of the small site. The hammock was investigated on .December 5 -7, 2005. Target #20 is a small area of higher ground with a cluster of sabal palms amid the surrounding slash pine and melaleuca trees. One shovel test (ST 29) was excavated, but the target area was considered to be lacking in archaeological site potential. Target #20 is situated near the western project boundary, off a north -south running swamp buggy trail, in the NW quarter of Section 25, to the south of Jump -start hammock Site (8CR881). The target was investigated on October 18, 2005, Target 4211 is a small area of higher ground with a concentration of sabal palms. Other vegetation consists of slash pine, saw palmetto, fern, and Brazilian pepper. Slash pines and melaleuca trees surround the target area. Two shovel tests were excavated, but the target area was considered to have low archaeological site potential. Target #21 is situated SW of Whitesheh Hammock Site (8CR879), and NE of the juncture of N -S and E -W running swamp buggy trails, near the center of Section 25. The target was investigated on October 18, 2005. Target 022 is an area of higher ground, which appears on the aerials as an area with potential, but on the ground has slash pine and melaleuca trees. A quick shovel probe revealed I -cm of darker sand above light brown (tan) sand. As the area lacked archaeological site potential, no shovel tests were excavated. Target #22 is situated NW of the juncture of E -W and lei -S swamp buggy trails, just west of the boundary between old project area and new project area (SE quarter of Section 25). The target was investigated on October 20, 2005. Target #23 is a tropical hardwood hammock, with diversified vegetation (live oaks, wild coffee, fern, sabal palm, wild coffee, etc.), with archaeological site potential. The higher ground of the hammock meets swamp to the west. and south. As the hammock appeared 55 to have site potential, four shovel tests (ST48 through ST51) were excavated, but all were negative for cultural materials. Pin flags mark the shovel test locations. Target #23 is situated in new project area at the SW quarter of Section 30, between two N -S running swamp buggy trails. The target was investigated on October 20, 2005. Target 624 is an area of higher ground and diversified vegetation (slash pine, saw palmetto, sabal palm, holly) surrounded by slash pines and melaleucas. Target #24 is a little north of Target #23, in the new project area at the SW quarter of Section 30, T 50S R27E, east of a N -S running swamp buggy trail. While the site potential was low at Target 9-24, one shovel test (ST47) was excavated, and it substantiated the low potential of the target area. The target was investigated on October 20, 2005. Ti abet 025, located southeast of Target #23, appeared to have potential from the aerial, but its reality is a higher ground area of slash pine, melaleuca, saw palmetto, and a lone sabal palm. A quick shovel probe showed tan sand below the surface, which could also be seen on the surface. Considered to not have archaeological site potential, no shovel tests were excavated at Target 025. The target was investigated on October 20, 2005. Target ##26, located ESE of Target #22, was another target that appeared as a small area with some potential on the aerial. But again this was a higher ground area dominated by slash pine, rnelaleuca, and saw palmetto, with tan sand at the surface. A deer feeder was strung up between two pines. Considered to not have archaeological site potential, no shovel tests were excavated at Target #26. The target was investigated on October 20, 2005. Target ##27, located in the west - central part of Section 25 a little south of the SE-NW trail between the trail that runs past Jump -start Hammock and a N -S running canal that heads to the south end of the parcel. It appeared on the aerial as a circular anomaly, possibly a hammock. However, on the ground this is an area of saw palmettos amid slash pineltnelaleuca stands, with tan sand at the surface. Considered not to have archaeological site potential, no shovel tests were excavated at Target #27. The target was investigated on December 5, 2005. Target 9-28, located a, little west of the N -S running canal in the SW quarter of Section 25, appears as a small circular anomaly. On the ground, the target was another area of saw palmettos mixed with a few wax myrtles, amid slash pine/melaleuca stands. While the site potential was low at Target #28, one shovel test (ST61) was excavated, and it substantiated the low potential of the target area. The target was investigated on December 5, 2005. Target 929, located neau° Target #28, this also appears on the aerial as a smaller circular anomaly. On the ground, the target was another area of saw palmettos mixed with a few unidentified juvenile deciduous trees and a few Brazilian peppers, amid slash pinelmelaleuca stands. While the site potential was low at Target #29, one shovel test (ST62) was excavated, and it substantiated the low potential of the target area. The target was investigated on December 5, 2005. MT Target #30, located in the SW corner of Section 25 and the parcel, appears as a fairly large circular anomaly, possibly a hammock, on the aerial. On the ground, the target was another area of saw palmettos mixed with a few sabal palms, amid slash pine /melaleuca stands. While the site potential was low at Target 4430, one shovel test (ST63) was excavated, and it substantiated the low potential of the target area. The target was investigated on December 5, 2005. Target #31, located in the SE portion of Section 30 and the parcel, is a tropical hardwood hammock with diversified vegetation, including sabal palms, live oaks, camphorwood, ferns, wild coffee, myrsine, etc. The hammock is the location of a previously recorded prehistoric site known as Silver Hardhat Site, 8CR826. However, most, or ail, of the hammock is situated in a rectangular cut -out not included in the Feathers parcel. With no survey stakes to represent the boundary, no shovel tests were excavated at the hammock. It is possible that the easternmost edge of the hammock may be within our project area, but it cannot be determined at this point in time. The target was investigated on December 13, 2005. Target 432, located 5E of Silver Hardhat Hammock in the SE portion of Section 30 and the parcel, appears a very small circular anomaly on the aerial, and as a small area of higher ground on the topographic map. On the ground, the target is a cypress dome, with the ground submerged by knee -deep water. As such, no shovel tests were excavated at Target #32. The target was investigated on December 13, 2005. Target #33, located N of Silver Hardhat Hammock in the SE portion of Section 30 and the parcel, appears a very small circular anomaly on the aerial, and as a small area of higher ground on the topographic map. On the ground, the target is a cypress dome, with the ground submerged by knee -deep water. As such, no shovel tests were excavated at Target #33. The target was investigated on December 13, 2005. Target #34, located in the SE corner of Section 30 and the parcel, and east of Silver Hardhat Hammock, appears as a circular anomaly on the aerial. On the ground, the target was another area of saw palmettos, amid slash pine /melaleuca stands, with tan sand at the surface. Considered not to have archaeological site potential, no shovel tests were excavated at Target #34. The target was investigated on December 13, 2005. Target #35, located in the SE corner of Section 30 and the parcel, and south of Target #34, appears as a circular anomaly on the aerial. On the ground, the target was another area of saw palmettos, amid slash pine /melaleuca stands, with tan sand at the surface. Considered not to have archaeological site potential, no shovel tests were excavated at Target #35. The target was investigated on December 13, 2005, Taarget #t36, located in the SE comer of Section 30 and the parcel, and south of Target #35, appears as a circular anomaly on the aerial. On the ground, the target was another area of saw palmettos mixed with a few cabal palms, amid slash pine /melaleuca stands, with tan sand at the surface. Considered not to have archaeological site potential, no shovel tests were excavated at Target 406. The target was investigated on December 13, 2005. 57 ST29 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target #20, a cluster of sabai palms on a small area of higher ground. 045 cm light brown (tan) sand, small root zone 45 cm limestone bedrock ST30 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target #21, a concentration of cabal palms and other diversified vegetation on higher ground, Surrounding the target area are slash pine and melaleuca trees. 0 -2 cm black sand, small root zone 2-40 cm light gray sand, small root zone 40 cm limestone bedrock ST31 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target #21, a concentration of cabal palms and other diversified vegetation on higher ground. Surrounding the target area are slash pine and melaleuca trees. ST31 is 10 -m E of ST30. 0 -7 cm black sand, small root zone 745 light gray sand, small root zone, water table hit at 45 cm ST32 (40 x 40 cm): Positive. At Jump -start hammock Site, 10 in east of ST -1. 0 -19 cm black sand, small root zone, cultural material (FS -9) 18-60 cm dark gray clayey sand, small root zone, cultural material (FS -10) 60 cm limestone bedrock ST 33 (40 x 40 cm): Positive. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m west of ST 1. 0 -50 cm black sand, small root zone, cultural material (FS -11) 50 -87 cm gray clayey sand, below water table 87 cm limestone bedrock ST34 (40 x 40 cm): Positive. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m east of ST32. 0 -50 cm dark brown sand, small root zone, cultural material (1FS42) 50 -60 cm dark gray sand, below water table ST35 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m east of ST34. 0-45 cm dark brown sand, small root zone 45 -56 cm light gray sand, below water table 5T36 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Jump -start Hammock Site; 10 rn east of ST35. 0 -40 cm dark brown sand, small root zone 40-60 cm light gray sand, below water table ST37 (40 x 40 cm): Positive. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m west of ST33. 0 -50 cm black sand, small root zone, cultural material (FS -13) 50 -50 cm gray clayey sand, below water table SO cm limestone bedrock ST38 (40 x 40 cm): Positive. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m south of ST1. 0 -20 can dark brown sand, small root zone, cultural material (F5 -14) 58 20 -70+ cm gray clayey sand, water table at 68 cm, cultural material (FS -15) ST39 (40 x 40 cm: Positive. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m south of ST38. 0 -20 cm dark brown sand, small root zone 20 -80 cm gray clayey sand, water table at 60 cm, cultural material (FS -16) 80 cm limestone bedrock ST40 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m west of ST37. 0 -20 cm light brown sand, small root zone 20 -50 cm mottled light brown and medium brown sand, small root zone 50 -92 cm light brown (tan) sand, below water table 92 cm limestone bedrock ST41 (40 x 40 cm): Positive. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m south of ST39. 0 -15 cm dark brown clayey sand, small root zone, cultural materials (FS -17) 15 -50+ cm gray clayey sand, small root zone, below water table ST42 (40 x 40 cm): Positive. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m north of ST1. 0 -40 cm black sand, small root zone, cultural material (FS -18) 40 -80 cm medium gray sand, water table at 50 cm 80 cm limestone bedrock ST43 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Jump -start ]Hammock Site, 10 m north of ST42. 0 -20 cm gray brown sand, small root zone 20 -84 cm light gray brown sand, water table at 40 cm, small roots above water table 84 cm limestone bedrock ST44 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m north of ST43. 0 -20 cm gray brown sand, small root zone 20 -76 cm light brown sand, water table at 40 cm, small roots above water table 76 cm limestone bedrock ST45 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m south of ST41, atop small dry depression on the surface. 0 -30 cm gray brown sand, small root zone 30 -95 cm very light gray sand, water table not hit ST46 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Jump -start Hammock Site, 10 m south of ST45. 0 -30 cm gray brown sand, small root zone 30 -60 cm light gray sand, water table at 45 cm ST47 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target #24, an area of higher ground and diversified vegetation, north of the tropical hardwood hammock of Target 9-23. 0 -67 cm gray sand, small root zone 67 cm limestone bedrock ST48 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target #23, a tropical hardwood hammock in the new project area. Soil appears very midden -like, but no cultural materials were encountered. 59 0 -52 cm black sand, small root zone 52 -62 can brown sand, water table at 50 cm 62 cm limestone bedrock ST49 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target 9-23, a tropical hardwood hammock in the new project area, 10 m north of ST48, 0 -40 cm dark gray brown sand, small root zone 4045 cm brown sand 45 cm limestone bedrock STS® (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target #23, a tropical hardwood hammock in the new project area, 10 m NE of ST49. 0-42 cm gray brown sand, small root zone 42 cm limestone bedrock STSI (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target 4-23, a tropical hardwood hammock in the new project area., 10 m S of ST48. 0 -15 cm dark gray sand, small root zone 15 -50 cm brown sand, water table at 45 cm 50 cm limestone bedrock ST52 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, toward the north end of the hammock, 10 m north of ST53. 0 -10 cm dark brown sand, small root zone 10 -40 cm gray brown sand, small root zone, water table at 35 cm 40 -55 cm light gray sand 55 cm limestone bedrock ST53 (4.0 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, toward the north end of the hammock, 10 m south of ST52. 0 -30 cm medium brown sand, small root zone 30 cm limestone bedrock ST54 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, toward the north end of the hammock, 10 m north of ST52. 0 -10 can dark brown sand, small root zone 10 -40 cm gray brown sand, small root zone 40 -50 cm light gray clayey sand 50 cm limestone bedrock ST55 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, toward the north end of the hammock, 10 m north of ST53. 0 -35 cm dark gray sand, small root zone 35 cm limestone bedrock ST56 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, toward the north end- of the hammock, I0 m east of ST53. 0 -30 cm dark gray brown sand, small root zone ,. o. 30-40 cm light gray clayey sand, small root zone 40 cm limestone bedrock ST57 (40 x 40 cm). Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, toward the north end of the hammock, 10 m east of ST56. 0 -20 cm dark brown sand, small root zone 20 -35 cm gray sand, small root zone 35 cm limestone bedrock ST58 (40 x 40 cart): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, toward the north end of the hammock, 10 m west of ST53. 0 -32 cm dark gray sand, small root zone 32 cm marly limestone bedrock ST59 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, toward the north end of the hammock, 10 m west of ST58. 0 -30 cm dark gray sand, small root zone 30 cm marly limestone bedrock ST60 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, toward the north end of the hammock, 10 m south of ST55. 0 -32 cm dark gray sand, small root zone 32 cm marly limestone bedrock ST611 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target #28, a cluster of saw palmettos and wax myrtles. 0-22 cm light gray sand, small root zone 22 -55 cm yellowish brown sand, water table at 42 cm ST62 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target #29, a cluster of saw palmettos, juvenile deciduous trees, and Brazilian peppers. 0 -12 cm dark gray sand, root zone 12-45 cm light gray sand, root zone, water table at 45 cm 45 -50 cm reddish brown sand ST63 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Target #30, a cluster of saw palmettos and cabal palms. 0 -30 cm dark gray sand, root zone 30 -40 cm light gray sand, root zone 40 -50 cm reddish brown sand ST64 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, center of hammock 0 -29 cm dark gray sand, root zone, water table at 29 cm 29 -80 cm gray brown sand ST65 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, 10 m S of ST64. 0 -36 cm dark gray sand, root zone, water table at 36 cm 36 -80 cm gray brown sand 61 ST66 (40 x 40 can): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, 20 m N of S T 64. 0 -45 ern dark gray sand, root zone, water table at 45 cm 45 -85 cm gray brown sand ST67 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, west side of hammock. 0 -33 cm gray sand, root zone 33 -40 cm light brown sand, root zone ST69 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, 20 rn W of ST67. 0 -22 cm gray sand, root zone 22-40 cm tight brown sand, root zone ST69 (40 x 40 can): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, 20 m W of ST68. 0 -8 cm. black sand, root zone 8-40 cm light brown sand, root zone ST70 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, 20 m W of ST69. 0 -23 cm gray sand, root zone 23-40 cm light brown sand, root zone ST71 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, 20 m E of ST67. 0 -30 cm gray sand, root zone 3040 cm light brown sand, root zone ST72 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, 20 m E of ST71. 0 -33 can gray to dark gray sand, root zone 33-40 cm light brown sand, root zone ST73 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, NE part of hammock. 0 -21 cm gray sand, root zone 21 -35 cm tan sand, water table at 23 can S174 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, NE part of harArnock. 0 -19 cm gray sand, root zone 19 -26 cm tan sand, water table at 20 cm ST75 (40 x 40 em): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, NE part of hammock. 0 -36 cm gray sand, root zone 36 -45 cm tan sand, water table at 38 cm ST76 (40 x 40 can): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, NE part of hammock. 0-35 cm gray sand, root zone 35 -50 cm tan sand, water table at 43 cm ST77 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep marsh Hammock, south centrai past of hammock. 0 -6 cm dark gray sand, root zone 62 6 -15 cm tan sand, water table at 7 cm ST78 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock, south central part of hammock. 0 -21 cm gray sand, root zone 21 -35 cm tan sand, water table at 25 cm ST'79 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 10 m N of ST6 (positive test from 2004). 0 -32 cm gray sand, root zone 32 -40 cm tan sand, water table at 32 cm STSO (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 10 m N of ST79 0 -25 cm dark gray sand, root zone 25 -30 cm tan' sand, water table at 25 cm ST81 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Beep Marsh Hammock Site, 0.5 m E of ST6 (positive test from 2004). 0 -32 cm dark gray sand, root zone 32 -35 cm tare sand, water table at 32 cm ST82 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 10 m E of ST6 (positive test from 2004). 0 -26 cm gray sand, root zone 26-30 cm tan sand, water table at 26 cm ST83 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 10 m E of ST82 0 -11 cm black sand, root zone 11 -20 cm tan sand, water table at 11 cm ST84 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 10 m W of ST6 (positive test from 2004). 0 -33 cm dark gray sand, root zone 33 -40 cm tan sand, water table at 33 cm ST85 (40 x 40 cm): Negative, At Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 10 m W of ST84 0 -16 cm gray sand, root zone 16 -20 cm tan sand, water table at 16 cm ST86 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Beep Marsh Hammock Site, 10 m S of ST6 (positive test from 2004). 0 -21 cm dark gray sand, root vane 21 -25 cm tan sand, water table at 21 cm ST87 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At,, Deep Marsh Hammock Site, 10 m S of ST86. 0 -5 cm light gray sand 5 -10 cm tan sand, water table at 5 cm ST88 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, 20 m W of ST59 63 0 -24 cm gay brown sandy loam, root zone 24 -35 cm very light gray clay ST89 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, 20 m W of ST88. 0 -23 cm gray brown sandy loam, root zone 23 -35 cm white clay ST90 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, 20 m W of ST89. 0 -20 cm dark brown sandy loam, root zone 20 -30 cm white clay ST91 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, 20 m N of ST90. 0 -23 cm dark brown sandy loam, root zone 23 -35 cm white clay ST92 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, 20 m N of ST91. 0 -20 cni dark brown sandy loam, root zone 20 -30 cm white clay ST93 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, 20 m N of ST92. 0 -15 cm dark brown silty loam, root zone 15 -20 cm white clay ST94 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, 20 to S of ST90. 0 -4 cm dark brown silty loam, root zone 4 -25 cm gray brown sand, root zone 25 -30 cm white clay ST95 (40 x 40 cm): Negative. At Whiteshell Hammock, 20 m S of ST94. 0-4 cm dark brown silty loam 440 cm gray brown sand, root zone, water table at 30 cm 40 -50 cm white clay Wage 1 Ent D (FMSF 3 only)__ /-- / -- Survey Log Sheet Survey # (FMSF only) Florida Master Site File Version 2.0 9197 Consult Guide to the Survey Log Sheet for detailed instructions. Survey Project (Name and project phase) Toll- Rattlesnake Parcel Phase One Report Title (exactly as on title page) A Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Feathers 2 Parcel, Collier County, Florida Report Author(s) (as on title pages -- individual or corporate; last names first) Beriault, John G., Weaver, Craig A. Publication Date (year) _2005 Total Number of Pages in Report (count text, figures, tables, not site forms) —66 Publication information (If relevant, series and no. in series, publisher, and city. For article or chapter, cite page numbers. Use the style of American Antiquity. see Guide to the Survey Log Sheet.) Archaeological and Historical Survey Technical Report # Supervisor(s) of Fieldwork (whether or not the same as authogs]; last name first) Carr, Robert S. Affiliation of Fieldworkers (organization, city) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy(AHC), Miami FL _ Key Words /Phrases (Don't use the county, or common words like archaeology, structure, survey, architecture. Put the most important first. Limit each word or phrase to 25 characters.) Feathers, Belie Meade, Rattlesnake Hammock, Sable Palm Road Survey Sponsors (corporation, government unit, or person who is directly paying for fieldwork) Name Sembler Company, Inc. Address /Phone Recorder of Log Sheet —John G. Beriault Date Log Sheet Completed `1_/_20/_05_ Is this survey or project a continuation of a previous project? X No 0 Yes: Previous survey #(s) rFMSF oniv) Counties Gist each one in which field survey was done - do not abbreviate; use supplement sheet if necessary) County Collier IJSGS 1:24,000 Map(s) : Map Name /Date of Latest Revision (use supplement sheet if necessary): Belle Meade and Belle Meade NW Dates for Fieldwork: Start –1-115—/-04— End –12–/15—/-05— Total Area Surveyed (fill in one) hectares _2300 acres Number of Distinct Tracts or Areas Surveyed ____one HR6E06610 -97 Florida Master Site Fife, Division of Historical Resources, Gray Building, 500 South Bronough Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399- 0250 Phone 850A87 2299,suncom 277 -2299, FAX 850- 921 -0372, Entail fmsfiie @mail.dos.state.fl.us, Web http : /hrivw.dos.state.fl.usldhrhnsf/ S17'oll- Ratt lesnake (aka Feathers 2)1Tofl- Rattlesnake (aka Feathers 2) PARCEL • ALL ITEMS FOR REPDRTTEA,rHERS 2 PARCEL SURVEY LOG 12- 20 -05.doc 0'1110i0e 9:42 AM Page 2 Survey Log Sheet of the Florida Master Site File s -- Types of Survey (check all that apply): x archaeological 0 architectural 0 historical /archival 0 underwater 0 other: Preliminary Methods (4Check as many as apply to the project as a whole. If needed write others at bottom). 0 Florida Archives (Gray Building) 0 library research - local public 0 local property or tax records 0 windshield 0 Florida Photo Archives (Gray Building) 0 library- special collection - nonlocal 0 newspaper files x aerial photography x FMSF site property search 0 Public lands Survey (maps at DEP) 0 literature search 0 FMSF survey search 9 local Informant(s) 0 Sanborn Insurance maps x other (descrfbe)grayline aerial photographs and USGS Map Archaeological Methods (Describe the proportion of properties at which method was used by writing in the corresponding letter. Blanks are interpreted as "None.' F( -ew. 0 -20%), 5( -ome: 20 -50%); M( -ost: 50 -90 %); or A(A, Nearly all: 90- 100 %). If needed write others at bottom. 0 Check here if NO archaeological methods were used. S_ surface collection, controlled _ other screen shovel test (size: _ block excavation (at least 2x2 M) surface collection, uncontrolled _ water screen (finest size: _) _ soil resistivity A shovel test- 1wscreen — posthole tests _ magnetometer _ shovel test -t!0" screen —auger (size:_) side scan sonar shovel test 1116"screen _ coring _ unknown _ shovel test- unscreened _ test excavation (at least ix2 M) other (describe): Historical /Architectural Methods (Describe the proportion of properties at which method was used by writing in the corresponding letter. Blanks are interpreted as "None. ") F( -ew: 0 -20 %), S( -ome: 20 -50 %); M( -ost: 50 -90 %); or A(-il, Nearly all: 90- 100 %)_ If needed write others at bottom. X Check here if NO historical /architectural methods were used- --building permits — demolition permits _-__ neighbor interview _ subdivision maps commercial permits _ exposed ground inspected — occupant interview tax records =interior documentation local property records _ occupatlon permits ^ unknown other (describe): Scope /intensity /Procedures Review of USGS maps and aerial photos followed by walking and vehicular survey, assessment of all established targets with gridded and selective judgmental excavation of ninetv -six 45cm screened shovel tests in twenty of thirty six targets. Site Significance Evaluated? XYes 6No If Yes, circle NR- eligible /significant site numbers below. Site Counts: previously Recorded Sites —one_ Newly Recorded Sites four Previously Recorded Site Ws (List site #'s without T." Attach supplementary pages if necessary) CR556 Newly Recorded Site Ws (Are you sure all are originals and not updates? Identify methods used to check for updates, ie, researched the FMSF records. List site #'s without T." Attach supplementary pages if necessary.) CR878, CR879, CR880, CR881, Site Form Used: X SmartForm 8 FMSF Paper Fond 0 Approved Custom Form: Attach copies of written approval from FMSF Supervisor. DO NOT USE 4..&46464.4SITE FILE USE ONLY++464+ *DO NOT USE BAR Related Related 0 872 0 1A32 0 CARL 0 UW BHP 0 State Historic Preservation Grant 0 Compliance Review: CRAT HR6E06610 -97 Florida Master Site File, Division of Historical Resources, Gray Building, 500 South Bronough Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399- 0260 Phone 8 6 0 487- 2 2 99,Suncom 277 -2299, FAX 860 -021 -0372, EmaU fmstlle@naiil.dos.state.fl.us, Web http : /Iwww.dos.state.fl.us /dhrtmsf/ S:1Feathers 21FEATHERS 2 PARCEL - ALL ITEMS FOR REPORTIFEATHERS 2 PARCEL SURVEY LOG 12- 20 -05.doc 01/03/06 10:14 AM ATTACH PLOT OF SURVEY AREA ON PHOTOCOPIES OF USGS 1:24.000 MAP(S-)-1 HR6E06690 -97 Florida Master Site File, [Division of Historical Resources, Garay Building, 500 SOWN e3gponaugPu SQreet, Tallahassee, Foot/ ula 32399- 0260 Phone 860487- 2299,Suncom 277 -2299, FAX 860- 929 -0372, lanai! frost -iIQ @mil.sdos.state.fl.us, NS's Pottge:l/ vvavau .d ®s.5da8e.8t.aesl�6ur/rr9s4t S:1Feathers 24--EATHERS 2 PARCEL - ALL ITEMS FOR REPORTWEATHERS 2 PARCEL SURVEY LOG 92- 2"6.afloc 921231 @6 8:33 AM Appendix Page 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site #8CR556 ❑ Original FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE Recorder # XUpdate Version 2,2 12/95 Field Date _12 115_/ 05 _ Form Date 1 _L21 J 05 Site Name(s) Hunting Camp Hammock (Muffiple Listing #8 Project Name Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel (Survey # Ownership: X privale -profit ❑private- nonprofil Oprivate- individual private- unspecified ❑city ❑county ❑state ❑ federal ❑foreign ❑native american ❑unknown USGS 7.5 map name & date Belle Meade (19 ). County Collier Township-50S Range_26E Section _13,_, '/4 Sect.: ❑NE x NW ❑SE x SW (check all that apply) City / Town _ Naples in Current City Limits? Y NX UTM: zone 1116 x17 easflng ,_ _ _ _ _0 northing _ _ _ . _ _ 0 Address / Vicinity of / Route to _I -75 Exit 101, south on CR951 4 miles, thence east on Florida Sports Park Road, thence north and east through woods behind Sports Park, thence south 1500 feet. Site is thence 300 feet east of cut section line t- ansect. NOTE THAT THE LOCATION ON THE 1985 SITE FORM IS WRONG. SITE IS ACTUALLY 900 FEET SW OF THE LOCATION GIVEN ON THE 1985 FORM. Landgrant Tax Parcel # Name of Public Tract (e.g., park) i lily El ST Xyes Ono 0 insuff. info Name of Local Register eligible for SETTING T STRUCTURES OR - - - - - -- - FEATURES - -- - - - - - -, - FUNC77ON rand - terrestrial ❑ Lake/Pond - lacustrine ❑ aboriginal boat ❑ fort ❑ road segment ❑ none specified ❑ Cave/ Sin - subterranean ❑ River/-Stream/Creek - nverirre ❑ agric/farm bldg X midden ❑shell midden X campsite ❑ terrestrial ❑ Tidal - estuanne ❑ burial mound ❑ mill unspecified ❑ shell mound X extractive site ❑ aquatic ❑ Saltwale r - marine ❑ building remains ❑ mission ❑ shipwreck X habitation (prehistoric) ❑ intermittently flooded ❑ marine unspecified ❑ cemetery/grave ❑ mound unspecified ❑ subsurface features ❑ homestead (historic) ❑ Wetland - palustrine ❑ "high energy' marine Cl dumpfrefuse 11 plantation ❑ surface scatter ❑ farmstead ® usually flooded (historically) ❑'low energy' marine ❑ earthworks ❑ platform mound ❑ well ❑ village (prehistoric) ❑ sometimes flooded El town (historic) ❑ usually dry ❑ quarry other Aboriginal ❑ Fort Walton ❑ Hickory Pond ❑ Perice Island ❑ Seminole: Colonization Nonaboriginal ❑ Alachua 11 Glades Ia ❑ Late Archaic 7 ❑ Safety Harbor ❑ Seminole: 1st War To 2d ❑ 1st Spanish 151399 II Archaic Unspecified? ❑ Glades Ito ❑ Late Swift Creek ❑ St. Augustine ❑ Seminole: 2d War To 3d ❑ tsl Spanish 1600 -99 ❑ Belle Glade 1 ❑ Glades I Unspec ❑ Leon - Jefferson ❑ St. Johns Ia ❑ Seminole: 3d War On ❑ 1 st Spanish 1700 -1763 ❑ Belle Glade II ❑ Glades IIa ❑ Malabar 1 0 SL Johns m ❑ Seminole- Unspecified ❑ 1st Spanish Unspecified ❑ Belle Glade III ❑ Glades lib ❑ Malabar 11 ❑ St. Johns I Unspecified ❑ Swift Creek Unspecified ❑ British 1763 -1783 ❑ Belle Glade N ❑ Glades nc: CI Manasota D St. Johns IIa ❑ Transitional ❑ 2nd Spanish 1783 -1821 ❑ Belle Glade Unspec ❑ Glades R Unspec ❑ Middle Archaic 7 ❑ St. Johns I1b ❑ Weeden Island 1 ❑ Amer.Territoel 1821 -45 OCaries Pond ❑Glades Me ❑ Mount Taylor ❑ St. Johns fic ❑ Weeden Island II ❑ Amer Civil War 1861 -65 ❑ Depfford ❑ Glades fllb C3 Norwood 0 St. Johns 11 Unspecified ❑ Weeden Island Unspec ❑ American 191h Century ❑ Early Archaic ❑ Glades Ulc ❑ Orange ❑ St. Johns Unspecified ❑ Prehistoric Nonceramic ❑ quarry American 201h Century ❑ Early Swift Creek ❑ Glades Ill Unspec ❑ Paleoindian ❑ Santa Rosa ❑ Prehistoric Ceramic ❑ American Unspecified ❑ Englewood X Glades Unspec ❑ Pensacola ❑ Santa Rosa -Swift Creek ❑ Prehistoric Unspecified ❑ A6ican- American ❑ other (Less common phases are not checktisled. For historic sites, also give specific dales if known) Potentially eligible for local designation? Xyes Ono 0 insuff. info Name of Local Register eligible for Individually eligible for National Register? Xyes Ono ❑ insuff. info Potential contributor to NR district? ❑yes Ono X insuff. info Explanation of Evaluation (Required if evaluated; limit to 3 lines; attach full justification) Fairly intense midden containing faunal bone, sand - tempered ceramics, marine shell in excellent condition Recommendations for Site Preservation or further investigation DHR USE ONLY======= OFFICIAL EVALUATIONS == = = = = = =DHR USE ONLY NR DATE KEEPER -NR ELIGIBILITY, ❑y On Date / / SHPO -NR ELIGIBILITY. ❑y On ❑pe Oil Date f/ I T DELISTDATE LOCAL DESIGNATION: Date / Local office National Register Criteria for Evaluation ❑a Cab ❑c ❑d HR6E04506 -92 Florida Master Site File 1 Div. of Hlstorlcal Resources t R. A. Gray Bldg 1500 S Bronough Stjallahassee, FL 32399-02501 (904) 407.22991 Suncom 277.22991 Fax 904 - 921.0372 Page 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site #8CR556 VYY qr FV-Mi rr*■OWN a i r.\ Extent Size (m2) ••rrv�uvs�a�.���r.ar• 111 m2 Depth/stratigraphy of deposit 30cm. Temporal Interpretation Components: ❑ single ❑ prob single X prob multiple ❑ multiple ❑ uncertain O unknown Describe each occupation in plan (refer to attached large scale map) and stratigraphically. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations. Integrity Overall disturbance: ❑ none seen X minor ❑ substantial ❑ major ❑ redeposited Site Detection Disturbances / threats / protective measures Site Boundaries ❑ no field check ❑ exposed ground x screened shovel ❑ bounds unknown ❑ remote sensing ❑ unscreened shovel ❑ literature search ❑ posthole digger ❑ aerial photo d none by recorder ❑insp exposed ground ❑ screened shovel ❑ informant report ❑ auger – size: ^ ❑ Field visit and ❑ auger – size:_ x estimate or guess ❑ literature search ❑ unscreened shovel survey Total Artifacts #,T (C)ount or (E)stimate7 _c Surface # ri posthole digger ❑ block excavations❑ remote sensing Overall Collection Strategy Artifact Categories /ArtifactVepositions ❑ information Disposition Ust Number, size, depth, pattern of units; screen size One 45cm square screened shovel test in west - central part of site. VYY qr FV-Mi rr*■OWN a i r.\ Extent Size (m2) ••rrv�uvs�a�.���r.ar• 111 m2 Depth/stratigraphy of deposit 30cm. Temporal Interpretation Components: ❑ single ❑ prob single X prob multiple ❑ multiple ❑ uncertain O unknown Describe each occupation in plan (refer to attached large scale map) and stratigraphically. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations. Integrity Overall disturbance: ❑ none seen X minor ❑ substantial ❑ major ❑ redeposited destroyed- documentl ❑ unknown Disturbances / threats / protective measures _Development, Pothunting Area Collected m2 Surface: #collect. Units Excavation: #contiguous blocks Total Artifacts #,T (C)ount or (E)stimate7 _c Surface # Subsurface # Overall Collection Strategy Artifact Categories /ArtifactVepositions Disposition Ust ❑ unknown x unselective (all artifacts) — unspecified _ nonlocal- exotic A - this catagory always collected ❑ selective (some artifacts) lithics, aboriginal _ metal, nonprecious 0 - observed, not collected ❑ mixed selectivity _ A_ ceramic - aboriginal _ bone -human ii - informant reported or collected ❑ uncollected ❑ general (not by subarea) T ceramic- nonaboriginal _ A_ _ bone - animal S - some items in catagory collected ❑controlled (by subarea) _ daub _ bone- unspecif R - collected & reburied at site ❑ variable spatial control _ bdck/bidg matl _ unworked shell U - unknown ❑ Other — glass _A _ worked shell _ precious metal /coin Other _ (Use abbreviation(s) from Deposition List to fill blank(s) of pertinent Artifact Categories) DIAGNOSTICS (Type and frequency) 1. Sand -tern red Plain Ceramics N =_ 5. N =_9. N= Nearest fresh water (type & name)surrounding cypress marsh Distance (m)/beadng NIA Natural community Tropical hardwood hammock Local vegetation red bay cabbage palm, campholwood, white stopper, marlberry, myrsine Topography elevated high ground MIN Elevation _Dim MAX Elevation _ +.8 meters_„_ Present land use undeveloped woodland _ SCS soil series Immokalee fine Soil association Informant(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Beriauit Location & File numbers (field notes, artifactslaccession nos, pholographs /negative nos.) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. 4800 S W 641h Avenue Suite 107 Davie FL 33314 (954) 792 -9776 Fax: f954)- 792 -9554 email: AHClpATT net Manuscripts or Publications on the site (Use Continuation Sheet, give FSF# if relevant) Recorder(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Bedault Affiliation or FAS Chapter FAS, SHA, ANC — * * * PLEASE INCLiIDE SITE PLANS * ` * I ARnF Sr:AI F MAP- Af 1"=)00' nr larnar --ila ehnw• 0A finund2d6s,15t cralu Mnrth arrow datrim frcfrrnllartinn unffc fin Inc fn INNS, RANr-,I='9AP M, k I C2 C: -T7 C --q 0 z cn CD co Appendix Page 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site #8CR878 ❑ Original FLORA MASTER SITE FILE Recorder # X Update Version 2.2 12/95 Field Date _12_/15_105 Form Date — 12_1_21 _105 Site Name(s) Clamshell Cove Midden [Mulfrple Listing #8 1 Project Name Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel [Survey # 1 Xyes Ownership: X private - profit ❑privale- nonprofil ❑ prvale- individual private - unspecified ❑city ❑county ❑stale ❑ federal ❑foreign ❑native arrercan ❑unknown USGS 7.5 map name & date Belle Meade (19 ). County Collier ❑ Seminole: Colonization Nonaboriginal Township_50S Range _26E Section _14_, '/4 Sect.: xNE ❑ NW ❑SE Q SW (check all that apply) ❑ Late Archaic ? City 1 Town _ Naples in Current City Limits? Y NX ❑ 1st Spanish 1513 -99 UTM zone 1116 x17 easting _ _ .._0 northing _ _ — _.._ ^ ._. 0 0 Late Swift Creek _ Address 1 Vicinity of 1 Route to – 1-75 Exit 101, south on CR951 4 miles, thence east on Florida Sports Park Road thence north and east behind the Sports Paris thence south 100 feet down Section 13/14 section line, thence west 250 feet Q 1st Spanish 1600-99 Landgrant Tax Parcel # ❑ Leon - Jefferson ❑ St. Johns Ia Name of Public Tract (e.g., parr) ❑ 1st Spanish 1700-1763 ❑ Belle Glade U ❑ Glades Ila ❑ Malabar I SETTING STRUCTURES - OR - FEATURES FUNCTION X Land - ferresbaf ❑ La and - faeusfrim ❑ aboriginal boat . ❑ fort ❑ road segment O none specified ❑ Ca &Sin - subterranean ❑ River /StmamlCreek - riverine ❑ agriclfarm bldg X midden ❑shell midden X campsite ❑ terrestrial ❑ Tidal - estuarine ❑ burial mound ❑ mill unspecified ❑ shell mound X extractive site 0 aquatic C.] Saltwater - marine Q building remains ❑ mission ❑ shipwreck X habitation (prehistoric) ❑ intermittenfly flooded ❑ marine unspecified ❑ cemetery/grave ❑ mound unspecified ❑ subsurface features Q homestead (historic) ❑ Wetland - pafuslaw ❑ "high energy' marine ❑ dumpfrefuse ❑ plantalion ❑ surface scatter ❑ farmstead ® usually flooded (historically) ❑ "Sow energy" marine ❑ earthworks ❑ platform mound ❑ well ❑ village (prehistoric) ❑ sometimes flooded ❑ Weeden Island Unspec ❑ American 19th Century ❑ town (historic) ❑ usually dry ❑ Orange ❑ quarry ❑ Prehistoric Nonceramic ❑ quarry American 201h Century ❑ Early Swift Crook other ❑ Palaoindian Q Santa Rosa Bills; a. ❑ insuff. info Name of Local Register eligible for Potentially eligible for local designation? Xyes Aboriginal ❑ Fort Walton ❑ Hickory Pond ❑ Perko Island ❑ Seminole: Colonization Nonaboriginal • Alachua ❑ Glades la ❑ Late Archaic ? Q Safety Harbor O Seminole: 1st War To 2d ❑ 1st Spanish 1513 -99 Q Archaic Unspecified? ❑ Glades to, 0 Late Swift Creek ❑ St. Augustine ❑ Seminole: 2d War To 3d Q 1st Spanish 1600-99 • Belle Glade I ❑ Glades I Unspec ❑ Leon - Jefferson ❑ St. Johns Ia O Seminole: 3d War On ❑ 1st Spanish 1700-1763 ❑ Belle Glade U ❑ Glades Ila ❑ Malabar I ❑ St. Johns Ito 0 Seminole- Unspecified ❑ 1st Spanish Unspecified ❑ Belle Glade III ❑ Glades rIb ❑ Malabar II ❑ St. Johns I Unspecified Q Swift Creek Unspecified ❑ Brifish 1763 -1783 Q Belle Glade IV Q Glades Ile Q Manasota ❑ Si- Johns Ua L3 Transitional 0 2nd Spanish 1783 -1821 ❑ Belle Glade Unspec Q Glades II Unspec ❑ Middle Archaic ? ❑ St. Johns Ilb ❑ Weeden Island 1 0 Amer.Terntoel 1821 -45 ZiCades Pond ❑Glades IIIa ❑ Mount Taylor ❑ St. Johns Ile 0 Weeder, Island U ❑ Amer. Civil War 1861 -65 ❑ Deptford ❑ Glades Inb Q Norwood ❑ St. Johns II Unspecified ❑ Weeden Island Unspec ❑ American 19th Century ❑ Eady Archaic 0 Glades Me ❑ Orange ❑ St. Johns Unspecified ❑ Prehistoric Nonceramic ❑ quarry American 201h Century ❑ Early Swift Crook ❑ Glades III Umpec ❑ Palaoindian Q Santa Rosa ❑ Prehistoric Ceramic ❑ American Unspecified L3 Englewood X Glades Unspec ❑ Pensacola ❑ Santa Rosa -Swift Creek ❑ Prehistoric Unspecified Q African-American ❑ other (Less common phases are not checklisted. For historic sites, also give specific dates if known) Explanation of Evaluation (Required if evaluated; limit to 3 lines; attach full justification) Fairly intense midden containing faunal bone, sand- tempered ceramics, marine shell in excellent condition Recommendations for Site Preservation or further investigation DHR USE ONLY = = == OFFICIAL EVALUATIONS = = = = == =DHR USE ONLY NR DATE KEEPER -NR ELIGIBILITY. Ely ❑n Date / SHPO -NR ELIGIBILITY: ❑y [In ❑pe oil Dafe /_J DELISTDATE LOCAL DESIGNATION- _- `Date / Local office National Register Criteria For Evaluation ❑a ❑b ❑c Lld Florida Master Site File I Div. of Historical Resources I R. A- Gray Bldg 1500 S Bronough St.,Tallahassee, FL 32W4-02501 (904) 487.22991 Suncom 277 -22991 Fax 904-921 -4372 Cempulc oeim Fe, h-ft F :W0C3T0W9V1R_95.DCC ❑ insuff. info Name of Local Register eligible for Potentially eligible for local designation? Xyes ❑no Individually eligible for National Register? Xyes ❑no ❑ insuff. info _ Potential contributor to NR district? Dyes ❑no X insuff. info Explanation of Evaluation (Required if evaluated; limit to 3 lines; attach full justification) Fairly intense midden containing faunal bone, sand- tempered ceramics, marine shell in excellent condition Recommendations for Site Preservation or further investigation DHR USE ONLY = = == OFFICIAL EVALUATIONS = = = = == =DHR USE ONLY NR DATE KEEPER -NR ELIGIBILITY. Ely ❑n Date / SHPO -NR ELIGIBILITY: ❑y [In ❑pe oil Dafe /_J DELISTDATE LOCAL DESIGNATION- _- `Date / Local office National Register Criteria For Evaluation ❑a ❑b ❑c Lld Florida Master Site File I Div. of Historical Resources I R. A- Gray Bldg 1500 S Bronough St.,Tallahassee, FL 32W4-02501 (904) 487.22991 Suncom 277 -22991 Fax 904-921 -4372 Cempulc oeim Fe, h-ft F :W0C3T0W9V1R_95.DCC Page 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site #8CR878 Extent Size (m2) 1500 m2 Depth/stratigraphy of cultural deposit 40cm. Temporal Interpretation Components: ❑ single ❑ prob single X prob multiple ❑ multiple ❑ uncertain ❑ unknown Describe each occupation in plan (refer to attached large scale map) and stratigraphi Gaily. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations. Integrity Overall disturbance: ❑ none seen X minor ❑ substantial ❑ major ❑ redeposited destroyed- document! ❑ unknown Disturbances / threats / protective measures _Development, Pothunting Area Collected M2 Surface: #collect. Units Excavation: #contiguous blocks rRt�- _ Site Boundaries -- Site Detection ❑ no field check ❑ exposed ground X screened shovel ❑ bounds unknown ❑ remote sensing ❑ unscreened shovel • literature search ❑ posthole digger ❑ aerial photo ❑ none by recorder Dinsp exposed ground ❑ screened shovel ❑ informant report ❑ auger--size:— ❑ Field visit and ❑ auger - size:— x estimate or guess ❑ literature search ❑ unscreened shovel survey _ nonlocal -exotic ❑ posthole digger D block excavations❑ remote sensing ❑ selective (some artifacts) ❑ information metal, nonprecious Number, size, depth, pattern of units; screen size Three 45cm square screened shovel tests in west - central part of site Extent Size (m2) 1500 m2 Depth/stratigraphy of cultural deposit 40cm. Temporal Interpretation Components: ❑ single ❑ prob single X prob multiple ❑ multiple ❑ uncertain ❑ unknown Describe each occupation in plan (refer to attached large scale map) and stratigraphi Gaily. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations. Integrity Overall disturbance: ❑ none seen X minor ❑ substantial ❑ major ❑ redeposited destroyed- document! ❑ unknown Disturbances / threats / protective measures _Development, Pothunting Area Collected M2 Surface: #collect. Units Excavation: #contiguous blocks (Use abbreviation(s) from Deposition List to fill blank(s) of pertinent Artifact Categories) DIAGNOSTICS (Type and frequency) 1. Ceramic abrader N =_ 5. N= ET Nearest fresh water (type & name)surrounding cypress marsh Distance (m)Ibearing NIA Natural community Diverse tropical hardwood hammock Local vegetation Live oak, cabbage palm, camphorwood, white stopper, mariberry, myrsine, mastic, bustic, satinleaf, graytw`tg, wild coffee, randia Topography elevated high ground MIN Elevation —0—m MAX Elevation +.8 meters_ Present land use undeveloped woodland SCS soil series Immokalee fine Soil association Informant(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Bedault Location & File numbers (field notes, artifacts /accession nos, photographs /negative nos.) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy Inc, 4800 S.W. 641h Avenue Suite 107 Davie FL 33314 $54) 792 -9776 Fax: (9541- 792 -9554 email AHCi(@ TT net Manuscripts or Publications on the site (use continuation sheet, give FSFtt if relevant) Recorder(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Bedault Affiliation or FAS Chapter FAS, SHA. AHC * * * PLEASE INCLUDE WE PLAINS * * * I APrF SCAT F MAP- Af V =90n' nr larnnr scalp shnw• On hmmdarlpe sraln Nnrfh arrnw dafnm fxfrcnllP.0lnn unifc trains fn liSRS .1 Total Artifacts # (C)ount or (E)sfimate? _c_ Surface # Subsurface # Overall Collection Strategy Artifact Categories /ArdfactDepositfons Disposition List ❑ unknown x unselective (all artifacts) __-_ _ unspecified _ nonlocal -exotic A - this catagory always collected ❑ selective (some artifacts) — lithics, aboriginal metal, nonprecious O - observed, not collected ❑ mixed selectivity _ _ ceramic - aboriginal bone -human I - informant reported or collected ❑ uncollected ❑ general (not by subarea) ceramic- nonaboriginal _ A_ _ bone - anima( S - some items in catagory collected ❑controlled (by subarea) daub ^ bone- unspeeif R - collected & reburied at site © variable spatial control _ bdck/bidg mail —A _ unworked shell U - unknown ❑Other — glass `A _ worked shell precious metal /coin —A— Other _possible ceramic abrader (Use abbreviation(s) from Deposition List to fill blank(s) of pertinent Artifact Categories) DIAGNOSTICS (Type and frequency) 1. Ceramic abrader N =_ 5. N= ET Nearest fresh water (type & name)surrounding cypress marsh Distance (m)Ibearing NIA Natural community Diverse tropical hardwood hammock Local vegetation Live oak, cabbage palm, camphorwood, white stopper, mariberry, myrsine, mastic, bustic, satinleaf, graytw`tg, wild coffee, randia Topography elevated high ground MIN Elevation —0—m MAX Elevation +.8 meters_ Present land use undeveloped woodland SCS soil series Immokalee fine Soil association Informant(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Bedault Location & File numbers (field notes, artifacts /accession nos, photographs /negative nos.) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy Inc, 4800 S.W. 641h Avenue Suite 107 Davie FL 33314 $54) 792 -9776 Fax: (9541- 792 -9554 email AHCi(@ TT net Manuscripts or Publications on the site (use continuation sheet, give FSFtt if relevant) Recorder(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Bedault Affiliation or FAS Chapter FAS, SHA. AHC * * * PLEASE INCLUDE WE PLAINS * * * I APrF SCAT F MAP- Af V =90n' nr larnnr scalp shnw• On hmmdarlpe sraln Nnrfh arrnw dafnm fxfrcnllP.0lnn unifc trains fn liSRS 13 �- CLAMSHELLCOVE. MDDE17, 8CR878 U Map of the'Toll- R- ,ttlesnake parcel area showing location of the Clamshell Cove MEidden, 8CR878. �,-.01 0 914 112 i iViiie E AND 3EL LE MEADE Nov, 1999 0 �z W d M3 m Appendix Page I ARCHAEOILOGICA.L, SITE FORM Site #80R879 ❑ Original FLORMA MASTER SITE FILE Recorder # x Update Version 2.2 12195 Field Date _1 /15 104 _ Form Date _1_1_31 _/ 04 Site Name(s) White Shell Hammock [Muliiple Listing #8 J Project Name Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel r [Survey # — f Ownership: X private -profit ❑private - nonprofit ❑ private - individual private - unspecified ❑city ❑county ❑state ❑ federal ❑foreign ❑native amencen ❑unknown USGS 7.5 map name $ date Belle Meade (1991) County Collier Township-50S- Range-26E Section _25_, °/a Sect.: WE ❑ NW ❑SE ❑ SW (check all that apply) City / Town _ Naples in Current City Limits? Y NX UTM: zone ❑ 16 x17 easting _ _ _ _ _0 northing . _ _ _ _ _ 0 Address t Vicinity of / Route to _I -75 Exit 101, south on CR951 4 miles, thence east on Sable Palm Road 1 mile, thence south on woods road 600 feet and SE on compass bearing 1000 Landgrant Name of Public Tract (e.g., park) X Land -terrestrial ❑ CakyelSink - subterranean ❑ terrestrial ❑ aquatic ❑ intermittently flooded ❑ Wetland - patustrine ® usually flooded (historically) ❑ sometimes flooded ❑ usually dry other ❑ Lake/Pond - lacustrine ❑ River /Stream/Creek - riverine ❑ Tidal - estuarine ❑ Saltwaie - marine ❑ marine unspecified • `high energy" marine • "low energy" marine Tax Parcel # ❑ aboriginal boat ❑ fort ❑ road segment ❑ a9dc1farm bldg X midden ❑shell midden ❑ burial mound ❑ mill unspecified ❑ shell mound ❑ building remains ❑ mission ❑ shipwreck ❑ cemetery/grave ❑ mound unspecified ❑ subsurface features ❑ dump/refuse ❑ plantation ❑ surface scatter ❑ earthworks ❑ platform mound ❑ well FUNCTION ❑ none specified X campsite X extractive site X habitation (prehistoric) ❑ homestead (historic) • farmstead • village (prehistoric) • town (historic) ❑ quarry Abortinal ❑ Fort Walton ❑ Hickory Pond ❑ Penco Island ❑ Seminole: Colonization Nonaborif f6i C7 Alachua ❑ Glades to ❑ Late Archaic 7 ❑ Safety Harbor ❑ Seminole: 1st War To 2d ❑ 1st Spanish 1513 -99 • Archaic Unspecified? ❑ Glades Ib 13 Late Swift Creek 113 St. Augustine ❑ Seminole: 2d War To 3d ❑ 1st Spanish 1600 -99 • Belle Glade I ❑ Glades r Unspec ❑ Lean - Jefferson ❑ St. Johns la ❑ Seminole: 3d War On ❑ 1st Spanish 1700.1763 • Belle Glade U ❑ Glades Ila ❑ Malabar 1 ❑ St. Johns lb ❑ Seminole - Unspecified 111 st Spanish Unspecified • We Glade Ill ❑ Glades Ub ❑ Malabar II ❑ St. Johns I Unspecified ❑ Swift Creek Unspecified ❑ British 1763 -1783 • Belle Glade IV ❑ Glades llc ❑ Manasota ❑ St- Johns lie ❑ Transitional ❑ 2nd Spanish 1783 -1821 • Belle Glade Unspec ❑ Glades U Unspec ❑ Middle Archaic ? [IS 1. Johns Ub ❑ Weeden Island 1 ❑ Amer.Terntori 1821 -45 ❑ Cades Pond ❑Glades Ilia ❑ Mount Taylor ❑ Si. Johns Ilc ❑ Weeden Island II ❑ Amer.Civil War 1861 -65 ❑ Deptford ❑ Glades IfIb ❑ Norwood ❑ St. Johns II Unspecified ❑ Weeden Island Unspec d American 191h Century ❑ Eady Archaic ❑ Glades Inc ❑ Orange ❑ St. Johns Unspecified ❑ Prehistoric Nonceramic Cl quarry American 241h Century ❑ Early Swift Creek ❑ Glades III Unspec ❑ Paleoindian ❑ Santa Rosa ❑ Prehistoric Ceramic ❑ American Unspecified ❑ Englewood X Glades Unspec O Pensacola 11 Santa Rosa -Swift Creek ❑ Prehistoric Unspecified ❑ African - American ❑ other (Less common phases are not checklisled. For historic sites, also give specific dates if known) Potentially eligible for local designation? Xyes Ono ❑ insuff. info Name of Local Register eligible for Individually eligible for National Register? ❑ yes Ono X insuff. info Potential contributor to NR district? ❑ yes Ono X insuff, info Explanation of Evaluation (Required if evaluated; limit to 3 lines; attach full justification) Fairly intense midden containing faunal bone, marine shell in excellent condition__ Recommendations for Site Preservation or further investigation DHR USE ONLY=-- == = OFFICIAL EVALUATIONS = = = = = == =DHR USE ONLY NR DATE KEEPER-NR ELIGIBILITY: Oy Gin Date __I ! SHPO•NR ELIGIBILITY: fay On Ope Oii Date DELiST DATE LOCAL DESIGNATION: Date / / / / Local office j National Register Criteria for Evaluation ❑a ❑b Dc ❑d Floride Master She File I Div, of HIMOcal Resources r R. A. Gray Bldg 1590 S 8(onough Stjallahassee, FL 32399-02501(904) 487 -2299 t Suncom 277.22991 Fax 904921 -0372 C..VA -E) Cm 4 M h tg F,:1D0CW0P_K Vin 9&DOC Page 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site MCR879 ,..u. Extent Size (m2) 1000 m2 Depth/stratigraphy of cultural deposit 15cm. Temporal Interpretafion Components; ❑ single ❑ prob single X prob multiple ❑ multiple ❑ uncertain ❑ unknown Describe each occupation in plan (refer to attached large scale map) and stratigraphically. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations. Integrity Overall disturbance: O none seen X minor ❑ substantial ❑ major O redeposited destroyed- document! ❑ unknown Disturbances / threats / protective measures _Development, Pothunting Area Collected m2 Surface: #collect. Units Excavation: #contiguous blocks — Site Boundaries ` Site Detection Total Artifacts #_ (C)ount or (E)stimate? Q no field check ❑ exposed ground x screened shovel ❑ bounds unknown ❑ remote sensing ❑ unscreened shovel ❑ literature search ❑ posthole digger ❑ aerial photo ❑ none by recorder ❑insp exposed ground Q screened shovel ❑ informant report ❑ auger–size. ❑ Field visit and ❑ auger–size:— x estimate or guess ❑ literature search ❑ unscreened shovel survey 0 - observed, not collected ❑ posthole digger ❑ block excavations[-i remote sensing ceramic - aboriginal _ bone -human ❑ information ❑ uncollected ❑ general (not by subarea) Number, size, depth, pattern of units; screen size Eighteen 45cm square screened shovel test in the site. ,..u. Extent Size (m2) 1000 m2 Depth/stratigraphy of cultural deposit 15cm. Temporal Interpretafion Components; ❑ single ❑ prob single X prob multiple ❑ multiple ❑ uncertain ❑ unknown Describe each occupation in plan (refer to attached large scale map) and stratigraphically. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations. Integrity Overall disturbance: O none seen X minor ❑ substantial ❑ major O redeposited destroyed- document! ❑ unknown Disturbances / threats / protective measures _Development, Pothunting Area Collected m2 Surface: #collect. Units Excavation: #contiguous blocks — chisel (Else abbreviation(s) from Deposition List to fill blank(s) of pertinent Artifact Categories) DIAGNOSTICS (Type and frequency) N= 5. N =– 9. N= Nearest fresh water (type & name)marsh 250 feet southwest Distance (m)lbearing 80 meters SW Natural community Tropical hardwood hammock - live oak/cabbage palm hammock_ Local vegetation Live oak, cabbage palm, camphorwood, white stopper, marlbarry, myrsine Topography elevated high ground_._ MIN Elevation _0_ m MAX Elevation _ +.8 meters_ Present land use undeveloped woodland _ SCS soil series Immokalee fine Soil association Informant(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Bedault Location & File numbers (field notes, artifacts /accession nos, photographs /negative nos.) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. _ 4800 SW 64th Avenue Suite 107 Davie FL 33314 (954) 792 -9776 Fax: (954}-792 -9554 email: AHCI(a1 TT.net Manuscripts or Publications on the site (Use Continuation Sheet, give FSF# if relevant)_ ,tecorder(s): Name /Address /Phone John G. Bedault _ Affil €abon or FAS Chapter FAS SHA, AHC — * * * PLEASE INCLUDE SITE PLAINS * * . LARGE SCALE MAP: At 1" =200' or larger scale, show: site boundaries, state, North arrow, datum, testicollection units, tie -ins to USGS. NARRATIVE DES CRIPTIONICONTINUATIONS: Attach additional sheets with detailed information or with continuations. ` Subsurface # Total Artifacts #_ (C)ount or (E)stimate? _c_ Surface # Overalf Collection Strateily Artifact Categories /ArUfact0eposfflons Disposition List unknown x unseiactive (all artifacts) _ unspecified nonlocal -exotic A - this calagory aways collected C1 selective (some artifacts) lithics, aboriginal _ metal, nonpreclous 0 - observed, not collected ❑ mixed selectivity ceramic - aboriginal _ bone -human I - informant reported or collected ❑ uncollected ❑ general (not by subarea) ceramic- nonabodginal – A_ _ bone- animal S - some items in catagory collected ❑controlled (by subarea) — daub _ bone- unspec €f R - coilecled & reburied at site ❑ variable spatial control — bdck/bldg mall – unworked shell U - unknown ❑ Other — glass �A _ worked shell precious metal /coin _A— Other possible whelk co €urnelia chisel (Else abbreviation(s) from Deposition List to fill blank(s) of pertinent Artifact Categories) DIAGNOSTICS (Type and frequency) N= 5. N =– 9. N= Nearest fresh water (type & name)marsh 250 feet southwest Distance (m)lbearing 80 meters SW Natural community Tropical hardwood hammock - live oak/cabbage palm hammock_ Local vegetation Live oak, cabbage palm, camphorwood, white stopper, marlbarry, myrsine Topography elevated high ground_._ MIN Elevation _0_ m MAX Elevation _ +.8 meters_ Present land use undeveloped woodland _ SCS soil series Immokalee fine Soil association Informant(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Bedault Location & File numbers (field notes, artifacts /accession nos, photographs /negative nos.) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. _ 4800 SW 64th Avenue Suite 107 Davie FL 33314 (954) 792 -9776 Fax: (954}-792 -9554 email: AHCI(a1 TT.net Manuscripts or Publications on the site (Use Continuation Sheet, give FSF# if relevant)_ ,tecorder(s): Name /Address /Phone John G. Bedault _ Affil €abon or FAS Chapter FAS SHA, AHC — * * * PLEASE INCLUDE SITE PLAINS * * . LARGE SCALE MAP: At 1" =200' or larger scale, show: site boundaries, state, North arrow, datum, testicollection units, tie -ins to USGS. NARRATIVE DES CRIPTIONICONTINUATIONS: Attach additional sheets with detailed information or with continuations. RANr.F= 7AF= DA Kin-r: 0'37C .13 wmrE SHELL HAMMOCK ATE, 8CR8i8 'yQ • v —aVia... ii W Map of the Toll - Rattlesnake parcel area showing location of the While Sh:;ll Hammock Site, 8CR879. DE 0 114 -lit t Mile n I Ow-A qw r • Appendix Page 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM ❑ Original FL OREDA MASTER SITE, FILE X, Update Version 2.2 12/95 Site 98CR880 Recorder # Field Date —12-/15_-/ 05 Form Date _12_1_21 _105 Site Names) Deep Marsh Hammock _ -_ - [MufSpte Listing #8 Project Name Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel [Survey # _- Ownership : x pnvate`profit ❑private - nonprofit ❑prnrate- individual private- unspecified ❑city []county ❑state El federal ❑foreign ❑native american ❑unknowr USGS 7.5 map name & date Berle Meade (19 ). County Collier Township_50S Range-26E Section _25_ '/4 Sect,: XNE ❑ NW ❑SE ❑ SW (check all that apply) City / Town _ Naples in Current City Limits? Y NX UTM:zone 016 x17 Basting _____..0 northing — _. - - - -0 Address / Vicinity of / Route to _I -75 Exit 101, south on CR951 4 miles, thence east on Sable Palm Road 1 mile, thence south on woods road 600 feet and SE on compass beating 1000 feet, thence due south Y4 mile Landgrant Name of Public Tract (e.g., park) RPVFAFDW17N __ Tax Parcel # r slu. i { ❑ insuff. info Name of Local Register eligible for: Potentially eligible for local designation? X yes Ono 1 • f�--- st�rr� rr "TY'PY7 ❑ Penco )stand ❑ Seminole: Colonization SEMNG - - STRUCTURE'S - OR FEATURES FUNC7 ON X Land - twestrial ❑ Lak and - lacusfrine ❑ aboriginal boat ❑ fort El road segment ❑ none specified EI Cave/sink - subterranean d RiverlSlream /Creek - nrrer ne ❑ agric/famr bldg X midden ❑shell midden X campsite ❑ terrestrial ❑ Tidal - estuarine ❑ burial mound ❑ mill unspecified ❑ shell mound X extractive rile ❑ aquatic ❑ Sal ater - marine ❑ building remains ❑ mission Cl shipwreck features X habitation (prehistoric) ❑ homestead (historic) ❑ intermittently flooded ❑ marine unspecified ❑ cemeterylgrave ❑ mound unspecified ❑ subsurface ❑ Grades IIc ❑ Wetland - paiustrine ❑ "high energy marine ❑ dumpirefuse ❑ plantation ❑ surface scatter ❑ farmstead ® usually flooded (historically) El "low energy" marine ❑ earthworks ❑ platform mound ❑ well ❑ village (prehistoric) ❑sometimes flooded ❑ St. Johns IIc ❑ Weeden Island Ii ❑ Amer.00 War 1861 -65 ❑ Deptford ❑ town (historic) • usually dry ❑ St. Johns 1I Unspecified Ll Weeden Island Unspec ❑ American 19th Century ❑ Early Archaic ❑ quarry other ❑ St. Johns Unspecified - — -- ❑ Early Swift Creek ❑ Glades III Unspec Explanation of Evaluation (Required if evaluated; limit to 3 lines; attach full justification) Fairly intense midden containing sand - tempered ceramics in excellent condition Recommendations for Site Preservation or further investigation DHR USE ONLY = = = = = == OFFICIAL EVALUATIONS =____ = = =DHR USE ONLY NR DATE DELIST DA TE National Regis KEEPER -NR ELIGIBILITY: SNPO -NR ELIGIBILITY: LOCAL DESIGNA770N: _ Local office Criteria for Evaluation Eta Ob Ely On ❑y On Ope OH Etc Od Date _/ 1 Date Date ffR6Et14508 92 Florida Master Site File I Div. of Historical Resources f R. A. Gray Bldg f 500 S Bronough St.,Tallahassee, FL 32399 - 02501(904) 487.22991 Suncom 277 -22991 Fax 904- 921 -0372 C..PWt D-d F& 1142 F;1D0C5T0P 1S\AR 95J)0C RPVFAFDW17N r slu. i { ❑ insuff. info Name of Local Register eligible for: Potentially eligible for local designation? X yes Ono ❑ Fort Walton ❑ Hickory Pond ❑ Penco )stand ❑ Seminole: Colonization Nonaborigina! _AbaRginal ❑ Alachua ❑ Glades la ❑ Late Archaic ? ❑ Safety Harbor ❑ Seminole: 1 st War To 2d ❑ 1st Spanish 1513 -99 ❑ Archaic Unspecified? ❑ Glades Ib ❑ Late Swift Creek C1 S1. Augustine ❑ Seminole: 2d War To 3d ❑ 1st Spanish 1600.99 ❑ Belle Glade I ❑ Glades I Unspec ❑ Leon - Jefferson ❑ St. Johns la ❑ Seminole: 3d War On ❑ 1st Spanish 1700 -1763 D Belle Glade II ❑ Glades Ira ❑ Malabar 1 ❑ St. Johns Ib ❑ Seminole- Unspecified ❑ 1 st Spanish Unspecified ❑ Belle Glade III ❑ Glades Ilb ❑ Malabar 11 ❑ SL Johns I Unspecified ❑ Swift Creek Unspecified ❑ British 1763 -1783 ❑ Belle Glade IV ❑ Grades IIc ❑ Manasota ❑ St. Johns Ila ❑ Transitional ❑ 2nd Spanish 1783-1821 ❑ Belle Glade Unspec ❑ Glades II Unspec ❑ Middle Archaic ? ❑ St. Johns IIb ❑ Weeden Island 1 ❑ Amer.Terntoel 1821 -45 ❑ Cades Pond ❑Glades Ma ❑ Mount Taylor ❑ St. Johns IIc ❑ Weeden Island Ii ❑ Amer.00 War 1861 -65 ❑ Deptford ❑ Glades IIIb ❑ Norwood ❑ St. Johns 1I Unspecified Ll Weeden Island Unspec ❑ American 19th Century ❑ Early Archaic ❑ Glades 111c ❑ Orange ❑ St. Johns Unspecified ❑ Prehistoric Noncenamic 0 quarry American 201h Century ❑ Early Swift Creek ❑ Glades III Unspec ❑ Paleoindian ❑ Santa Rosa ❑ Prehistoric Ceramic ❑ American Unspecified ❑ Englewood X Glades Unspec ❑ Pensacola ❑ Santa Rosa-Swift Creek ❑ Prehistoric Unspecified ❑ African- American ❑ other (Less common phases are not checklisted. For historic siles, also give specific dates if known) Explanation of Evaluation (Required if evaluated; limit to 3 lines; attach full justification) Fairly intense midden containing sand - tempered ceramics in excellent condition Recommendations for Site Preservation or further investigation DHR USE ONLY = = = = = == OFFICIAL EVALUATIONS =____ = = =DHR USE ONLY NR DATE DELIST DA TE National Regis KEEPER -NR ELIGIBILITY: SNPO -NR ELIGIBILITY: LOCAL DESIGNA770N: _ Local office Criteria for Evaluation Eta Ob Ely On ❑y On Ope OH Etc Od Date _/ 1 Date Date ffR6Et14508 92 Florida Master Site File I Div. of Historical Resources f R. A. Gray Bldg f 500 S Bronough St.,Tallahassee, FL 32399 - 02501(904) 487.22991 Suncom 277 -22991 Fax 904- 921 -0372 C..PWt D-d F& 1142 F;1D0C5T0P 1S\AR 95J)0C RPVFAFDW17N r slu. i { ❑ insuff. info Name of Local Register eligible for: Potentially eligible for local designation? X yes Ono Individually eligible for National Register? 0 yes Ono X insuff. info Potential contributor to NR district? ❑ yes Ono X insuff. info Explanation of Evaluation (Required if evaluated; limit to 3 lines; attach full justification) Fairly intense midden containing sand - tempered ceramics in excellent condition Recommendations for Site Preservation or further investigation DHR USE ONLY = = = = = == OFFICIAL EVALUATIONS =____ = = =DHR USE ONLY NR DATE DELIST DA TE National Regis KEEPER -NR ELIGIBILITY: SNPO -NR ELIGIBILITY: LOCAL DESIGNA770N: _ Local office Criteria for Evaluation Eta Ob Ely On ❑y On Ope OH Etc Od Date _/ 1 Date Date ffR6Et14508 92 Florida Master Site File I Div. of Historical Resources f R. A. Gray Bldg f 500 S Bronough St.,Tallahassee, FL 32399 - 02501(904) 487.22991 Suncom 277 -22991 Fax 904- 921 -0372 C..PWt D-d F& 1142 F;1D0C5T0P 1S\AR 95J)0C Page 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site #8CR880 a `.. m,x u r 'ita71L'1i'Yi2L'i'lrirl [zr�f-Ftlan neteci7on Site BotrndarieS • no field check ❑ exposed ground x screened shovel ❑ bounds unknown ❑ remote sensing ❑ unscreened shovel • literature search ❑ posthole digger ❑ aerial photo ❑ none by recorder oinsp exposed ground x screened shovel • informant report ❑ auger–size:— ❑ Field visit and ❑ auger – size:_ ❑ estimate or guess ❑ literature search 0 unscreened shovel survey ❑ posthole digger ❑ block excavations❑ remote sensing a information Number, size, depth, pattern of units; screen size Twenty five 45cm square screened shovel tests in site area Extent Size (m2) 1000 m2 Depthfstraiigraphy of cultural deposit 40cm. Temporal Interpretation Components: ❑ single 0 prob single X prob multiple ❑ multiple 0 uncertain 0 unknown Describe each occupation in plan (refer to attached large scale map) and stratigraphically. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations. Integrity Overall disturbance: 0 none seen X minor 0 substantial ❑ major 0 redeposited destroyed- documentl 0 unknown Disturbances/ threats /protective measures _Development, Pothunting Area Collected m2 Surface: #collect. Units Excavation: #contiguous blocks DIAGNOSTICS (Type and frequency) 1._ Sand - tempered plain ceramics N =_ 5. N =_9 _ N= r s Nearest fresh water (type & name)marsh 1000 feet south _ Distance m Natural community Cabbage palm hammock ()!bearing 30 meters S Local vegetation Live oak, cabbage palm, myrsine Topography elevated high ground MIN Elevation —0_ m MAX Elevation +.5 meters- Present Present land use undeveloped woodland _ SCS soil series Immokalse fine Soil association Informant(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Bedault —� Location & File numbers (field notes, artifactstaccession nos, photographs /negative nos.) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy Inc 4800 S.W. 64th Avenue Suite 107 Davie FL 33314 (954) 792 -9776 Fax: (954) - 792 -9554 email: AHCI @ATi net _ Manuscripts or Publications on the site (Use continuation Sheet, give FSF# if relevant) Recordegs): NamelAddress/Phone John G. Beriault • Affiliation or FAS Chapter FAS, SHA, AHC * * * PLEASE 1 CLUDE SITE PLANS * • ' LARGE SCALE MAP: At 1 "�00' or larger scale, show: site boundaries, scale, North arrow, datum, tesilcollection units, ue•Ins to USGS. NARRATIVE DES CRIPTIONICONTINUATIONS: Attach additional sheets with detailed Information or with continuations, Surface # Total Artifacts #_ (C)ount or (E)sttmate? Subsurface # Overall Collecfion SWateav ArdfactCateporfes IArtifacti)eposidons Disposition List 0 unknown x unselective (all artifacts) unspecified _ nonlocal -exotic A - this category always collected ❑ selective (some artifacts) lithics, aboriginal — metal, nonprecious 0 - observed, not collected 0 mixed selectivity _ A ceramic - aboriginal bone -human T -informant reported or collected ❑ uncollected 0 general (not by subarea) _ ceramic- nonaboriginal bone-animal S - some items in category collected ❑controlled (by subarea) _ daub _ bone - unspecif R - collected & reburied at site 0 variable spatial' control b6ck/btdg mall _ unworked shell U - unknown 0 Other _ glass _ _ worked shell precious metal /coin _ _ Other _ DIAGNOSTICS (Type and frequency) 1._ Sand - tempered plain ceramics N =_ 5. N =_9 _ N= r s Nearest fresh water (type & name)marsh 1000 feet south _ Distance m Natural community Cabbage palm hammock ()!bearing 30 meters S Local vegetation Live oak, cabbage palm, myrsine Topography elevated high ground MIN Elevation —0_ m MAX Elevation +.5 meters- Present Present land use undeveloped woodland _ SCS soil series Immokalse fine Soil association Informant(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Bedault —� Location & File numbers (field notes, artifactstaccession nos, photographs /negative nos.) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy Inc 4800 S.W. 64th Avenue Suite 107 Davie FL 33314 (954) 792 -9776 Fax: (954) - 792 -9554 email: AHCI @ATi net _ Manuscripts or Publications on the site (Use continuation Sheet, give FSF# if relevant) Recordegs): NamelAddress/Phone John G. Beriault • Affiliation or FAS Chapter FAS, SHA, AHC * * * PLEASE 1 CLUDE SITE PLANS * • ' LARGE SCALE MAP: At 1 "�00' or larger scale, show: site boundaries, scale, North arrow, datum, tesilcollection units, ue•Ins to USGS. NARRATIVE DES CRIPTIONICONTINUATIONS: Attach additional sheets with detailed Information or with continuations, 0 A KIP-F: 9A r- PAKIM=97P Appendix Page 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORS][ Site #8CR881 ❑ Original FLORIDA. MASTER SITE FII.E Recorder# x Update Version 2.2 12/95 Field Date _12_/15_/ 05 Form Date W12_1_21 _105 Site Name(s) Jump -Start Hammock (Multiple Listing #8 j Project Name Toll - Rattlesnake Parcel (Survey # ❑ Alachua Ownership: X private -profit ❑private - nonprofit ❑private - individual private - unspecified ❑city ❑county, ❑state ❑ federal ❑foreign ❑native american ❑unknown USGS 7.5 map name & date Belle Meade (19 ). County Collier ❑ Archaic Unspecified? Township 50S Range_26E Section _25_, 1/4 Sect.: ME X NW ME ❑ SW (check all that apply) ❑ St. Augustine City / Town _ Naples in Current City Limits? Y NX ❑ Leon - Jefferson UTM:zone 016 x17 easting ___ --- 0 northing - -_—y ❑ Glades Ila -0 Address / Vicinity of l Route to _I -75 Exit 101, south on CR951 A miles, thence east on Sable Palm Road 1 mile, thence south on woods road 600 feet ❑ Belle Glade III ❑ Glades Ilb Landgrant Tax Parcel # • Belle Glade IV Name of Public Tract (e.g., park) ❑ Manasota ❑ St. Johns IIa • Belle Glade Unspec ❑ Glades II Unspec ❑ Middle Archaic ? SETTING ❑ Cades Pond ❑Glades Ufa STRUCTt/RES - OR - FEATURES FUNCTION X Land - terrestrial ❑ Lakelpon d - lecustrine ❑ Glades Mb ❑ aboriginal boat ❑ fort ❑ road segment ❑ none specified ❑ C eJSin - subterranean ❑ RivedStreamtCreek - riverine ❑ agrictfarm bldg X midden ❑shelf midden X campsite ❑ terrestrial ❑ Tidal - estuarine • aquatic ❑ Saltwaler - marine * Early Swift Creek ❑ burial mound ❑ mill unspecified ❑ shelf mound ❑ building remains ❑ mission O shipwreck X extractive site X habitation (prehistoric) • in €ermittenily flooded ❑ marine unspecified ❑ Wetland - palustrine ❑'high energy' marine ❑ Englewood ❑ cemetery/grave ❑ mound unspecified ❑ subsurface features ❑ dump/refuse ❑ ❑ ❑ homestead (historic) © usually flooded (historically) ❑'tow energy' marine ❑ other (Less common phases are not checkfisted. For historic sites, also give specific dates if known) plantation surface scatter ❑ earthworks ❑ platform mound Cl well ❑ farmstead ❑ village (prehistoric) ❑ sometimes flooded 13 usually dry ❑ town (historic) other ❑quarry Aboriafinal ❑ Fort Wagon ❑ Hickory Pond ❑ Pedco Island- ❑ Alachua ❑ Glades Ia ❑ Late Archaic ? ❑ Safety Harbor ❑ Archaic Unspecified? ❑ Glades lb ❑ Late Swift Creek ❑ St. Augustine ❑ Belle Glade I ❑ Grades I Unspec ❑ Leon - Jefferson ❑ St. Johns fa ❑ Belle Glade If ❑ Glades Ila ❑ Malabar I ❑ St. Johns Ib ❑ Belle Glade III ❑ Glades Ilb ❑ Malabar IT ❑ St. Johns I Unspecified • Belle Glade IV ❑ Glades IIc ❑ Manasota ❑ St. Johns IIa • Belle Glade Unspec ❑ Glades II Unspec ❑ Middle Archaic ? ❑ St. Johns 11b ❑ Cades Pond ❑Glades Ufa ❑ Mount Taylor ❑ St. Johns IIc Cl Deptford ❑ Glades Mb ❑ Norwood ❑ St. Johns II Unspecified ❑ Early Archaic ❑ Glades Mc ❑ Orange ❑ St. Johns Unspecified * Early Swift Creek ❑ Glades III Unspec ❑ Paleoindian ❑ Santa Rosa ❑ Englewood X Glades Unspec ❑ Pensacola C_i Santa Rosa-Swift Creek ❑ other (Less common phases are not checkfisted. For historic sites, also give specific dates if known) • Seminole: Colonization Nonaboriglnal ❑ Seminole: 1st War To 2d ❑ 1st Spanish 1513.99 ❑ Seminole: 2d War To 3d ❑ 1st Spanish 1600 -99 • Seminole: 3d War On ❑ 1st Spanish 1700 -1763 • Seminole- Unspecified ❑ ist Spanish Unspecified ❑ Swift Creek Unspecified ❑ British 1763 -1783 • Transitional ❑ 2nd Spanish 1783.1821 • Weeden Island I ❑ Amer.Territoel 18214 ❑ Weeden Island II ❑ Amer.Civil War 1861 -65 ❑ Weeden Island Unspec ❑ American 19th Cenlury ❑ Prehistoric Nonceramic ❑ quarry American 20th Century ❑ Prehistoric Geramic ❑ American Unspecified ❑ Prehistoric Unspecified 0 African - American Explanation of Evaluation (Required if evaluated; limit to 3 lines; attach full justification) Fairly intense midden containing faunal bone, marine shell in excellent condition Recommendations for Site Preservation or further investigation �J DHR USE ONLY===--= OFFICIAL EVALUATIONS ===== = = =DHR USE ONLY NR DATE KEEPER -NR ELIGIBILITY: 13y 13 Date / / SHPO•NR ELIGIBILITY: ❑y ❑n ❑pe ❑ii Date DELIST DATE LOCAL DESIGNATION: Dad Local office -- National Register Criteria for Evaluatlon ❑a ❑b ❑c ❑d rindda biacrat Siva Filn i my W uacrnd,nr Den..u.,.e.. r o A/ -.. -- 1 cM n n - _ . _, _ — . ___ _ _._.,__,,, ..............as..,;, , 1 „�,,,, -„a.w, i—t) wt -ctnr t auncom LYr -zt991 Fax 904921 -0372 Comptme Docwnd F& rrAry FADOCStFORMStAR 97.D0C _ 0 Potentially eligible for local designation? Xyes Ono ❑ insuff. Info Name of Local Register eligible for: Individually eligible for National Register? Xyes Ono ❑ insuff. info Potential contributor to NR district? Oyes Ono X insuff. info Explanation of Evaluation (Required if evaluated; limit to 3 lines; attach full justification) Fairly intense midden containing faunal bone, marine shell in excellent condition Recommendations for Site Preservation or further investigation �J DHR USE ONLY===--= OFFICIAL EVALUATIONS ===== = = =DHR USE ONLY NR DATE KEEPER -NR ELIGIBILITY: 13y 13 Date / / SHPO•NR ELIGIBILITY: ❑y ❑n ❑pe ❑ii Date DELIST DATE LOCAL DESIGNATION: Dad Local office -- National Register Criteria for Evaluatlon ❑a ❑b ❑c ❑d rindda biacrat Siva Filn i my W uacrnd,nr Den..u.,.e.. r o A/ -.. -- 1 cM n n - _ . _, _ — . ___ _ _._.,__,,, ..............as..,;, , 1 „�,,,, -„a.w, i—t) wt -ctnr t auncom LYr -zt991 Fax 904921 -0372 Comptme Docwnd F& rrAry FADOCStFORMStAR 97.D0C _ 0 Page 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site #8CR881 lf1C /!i f 7rrr -rrf Rf7 rPDC— ITrT3'�}Ti r7 Lt _ -- Site Detection v _ - - Site Boundaries f Id h k ❑ e osed round x screened shovel 1i bounds unknown Li remote sensing ❑ unscreened shovel ❑ no le c ec xp g • literature search ❑ posthole digger ❑ aerial photo • informant report ❑ auger -- size:, ❑ Field visit and • literature search ❑ unscreened shovel survey ❑ posthole digger ❑ block excavations❑ remote sensing ❑ information ❑ none by recorder ❑insp exposed ground x screened shovel 0 auger - size:— ❑ estimate or guess Number, size, depth, pattern of units-, screen size Sixteen 45cm square screened shovel test in west - central part of site. Extent Size (m2) 1000 m2 Dep#Vstratigmphy of cultural deposit 30cm. Temporal Interpretation Components: ❑ single ❑ prob single X prob multiple ❑ multiple ❑ uncertain ❑ unknown Describe each occupation in plan (refer to attached large scale map) and stratigraphioally. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations. Integrity Overall disturbance: ❑ none seen X minor ❑ substantial ❑ major ❑ redepositeo aes[royeo-Qocurnernr u u+rnriUMI Disturbances / threats / protective measures _Development, Pothunting Area Collected m2 Surface: #collect. Units Excavation: #contiguous blocks Total Artifacts #_ (C)ount or (E)stimate? Overall Collection Stratecly ❑ unknown x unselective (ail artifacts) ❑ selective (some artifacts) ❑ mixed selectivity ❑ uncollected ❑ general (not by subarea) ❑controlled (by subarea) ❑ variable spatial control ❑ Other _c Surface # Artifact Categories / Artifact Depositions — unspecified _ nonlocal -exotic Subsurface # — lithics, aboriginal _ metal, nonprecious ceramic- aboriginal — bone -human ceramic- nonabodginal _ A_ _ bone - animal _ daub bdck/bldg mail — glass precious metal/coin _ bone- unspeclf unworked shell _A _ worked shell _A_ Other _possible bone Disposition List A - this calagory always collected 0 - observed, not collected I - informant reported or collected S - some items in calagory collected R - collected & reburied at site U - unknown (Use abbreviation(s) from Deposition List to fill blank(s) of pertinent Artifact Categories) DIAGNOSTICS (Type and frequency) 1. N =_ 5. N =_ 9. N =� Nearest fresh water (type & name)marsh 250 feet southeast Distance (m)/bearing 80 meters SE Natural community Tropical hardwood hammock Local vegetation Live oak, cabbage palm, camphorwood, white stopper, marlberry, myrsine Topography elevated high ground MIN Elevation W0_ m MAX Elevation _ +.8 meters_ Present land use undeveloped woodland SCS soil series Immokalee fine Soil association Informant(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Beriauit Location & File numbers (field notes• arfiracts /accession nos, photographs /negative nos.) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. 4800 S W 641h Avenue Suite 107 Davie FL 33314 {954) 792 -9776 Fax: (954)- 792 -9554 email: AHCI(aATT net Manuscripts or Publications on the site (Use continuation sheet, give FSFN it relevant) Recorder(s): Name /Address/Phone John G. Beriault Affiliation or FAS Chapter FAS, SHA, AHC • " " PLEASE INCLUDE WE PLANS • " LARGE SCALE MAP: At V=200' or larger scale, show: site boundaries, scale, North arrow, datum, teslicoliection units, tle-Ins to USGS. NARRATIVE DES cRIPTIONICONTINUATIONS: Attach additional sheets with detailed information or with confinuatlons. Co v4wD.AM FBI rr+•N8 F:W0CSW0RMSNa_95D0C ❑ none by recorder ❑insp exposed ground x screened shovel 0 auger - size:— ❑ estimate or guess Number, size, depth, pattern of units-, screen size Sixteen 45cm square screened shovel test in west - central part of site. Extent Size (m2) 1000 m2 Dep#Vstratigmphy of cultural deposit 30cm. Temporal Interpretation Components: ❑ single ❑ prob single X prob multiple ❑ multiple ❑ uncertain ❑ unknown Describe each occupation in plan (refer to attached large scale map) and stratigraphioally. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations. Integrity Overall disturbance: ❑ none seen X minor ❑ substantial ❑ major ❑ redepositeo aes[royeo-Qocurnernr u u+rnriUMI Disturbances / threats / protective measures _Development, Pothunting Area Collected m2 Surface: #collect. Units Excavation: #contiguous blocks Total Artifacts #_ (C)ount or (E)stimate? Overall Collection Stratecly ❑ unknown x unselective (ail artifacts) ❑ selective (some artifacts) ❑ mixed selectivity ❑ uncollected ❑ general (not by subarea) ❑controlled (by subarea) ❑ variable spatial control ❑ Other _c Surface # Artifact Categories / Artifact Depositions — unspecified _ nonlocal -exotic Subsurface # — lithics, aboriginal _ metal, nonprecious ceramic- aboriginal — bone -human ceramic- nonabodginal _ A_ _ bone - animal _ daub bdck/bldg mail — glass precious metal/coin _ bone- unspeclf unworked shell _A _ worked shell _A_ Other _possible bone Disposition List A - this calagory always collected 0 - observed, not collected I - informant reported or collected S - some items in calagory collected R - collected & reburied at site U - unknown (Use abbreviation(s) from Deposition List to fill blank(s) of pertinent Artifact Categories) DIAGNOSTICS (Type and frequency) 1. N =_ 5. N =_ 9. N =� Nearest fresh water (type & name)marsh 250 feet southeast Distance (m)/bearing 80 meters SE Natural community Tropical hardwood hammock Local vegetation Live oak, cabbage palm, camphorwood, white stopper, marlberry, myrsine Topography elevated high ground MIN Elevation W0_ m MAX Elevation _ +.8 meters_ Present land use undeveloped woodland SCS soil series Immokalee fine Soil association Informant(s): Name/Address/Phone John G. Beriauit Location & File numbers (field notes• arfiracts /accession nos, photographs /negative nos.) Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. 4800 S W 641h Avenue Suite 107 Davie FL 33314 {954) 792 -9776 Fax: (954)- 792 -9554 email: AHCI(aATT net Manuscripts or Publications on the site (Use continuation sheet, give FSFN it relevant) Recorder(s): Name /Address/Phone John G. Beriault Affiliation or FAS Chapter FAS, SHA, AHC • " " PLEASE INCLUDE WE PLANS • " LARGE SCALE MAP: At V=200' or larger scale, show: site boundaries, scale, North arrow, datum, teslicoliection units, tle-Ins to USGS. NARRATIVE DES cRIPTIONICONTINUATIONS: Attach additional sheets with detailed information or with confinuatlons. Co v4wD.AM FBI rr+•N8 F:W0CSW0RMSNa_95D0C RAWr,1= 991= VA1J[%C-- 41'75:7 K— ---I 0 z Cn O JUMP -START HAMMOCK SITE, Wnsal Map of the Toll -R-aa-desnake parcel area shoving location of the Jumpstart Hammock Site, 8CR891 N 0 914 912 1 Mile EXHIBIT 30 LETTER FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES "J FLORIDA DEPAR,rMENT OF STATE Dawrt K. Roberts Interim Secretary of State DIVISION OF 1 IISTORICAL RESOURCES Ms. Laura Layman South Florida Water Management .District 2301 McGregor Boulevard Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Re: DHR No.: 2010- 036213 /Received by DIJR: January 27, 2010 Additional material received by DI-1R: June 8, 2010 Application No.: 100126 -5 Applicant: David Torres Project: Hacienda Lakes Collier County Dear Ms. Layman: June 9, 2010 Our office requested confirmation that referenced project will avoid five archaeological sites (8CR556, 8CR878 -880, and 8CR881). In response, Cheryl Rolph of Passarella & Associates, Inc., has provided a conservation areas Wrap which demonstrates that these sites will remain within conservation areas for the currently proposed pro'iect phase. This fulfills our request and concludes our review of this application; no historic properties are likely to be adversely affected in the completion of this project. We are grateful to Passarella and Assocites, Inc., for their assistance in this. For any questions concerning our comments, please contact Stacey Cahan, Historic Sites Specialist, by phone at 850.245.6333, or by electronic mail at dscahan @dos.state.fl.us. We appreciate your continued interest in protecting Florida's historic properties. Sincerely, X�L ca_ �ec . Laura A. Kammerer Historic Preservationist Supervisor Compliance Review Section Bureau of Historic Preservation Pc: Emilio Robau, RWA, Inc. Cheryl Rolph, Passarella & Associates, Inc. 500 S. Brouough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399 -0250 • http://wivw.11heritage.com O Director's Office O Archaeological Research © Historic Preservation 850.245.6300 • FAX: 245.6436 850.245.6444 • FAX: 245.6,152 850.245.6333 • FAX: 245.6437 Hacienda Lakes Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Prepared by: Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. April 7, 2011 619001 -00.09 COPR Prepared under the supervision of: William E. Oliver P.E. Registration No.: 31157 Signature:_ Date: 04/11/2011 u Hacienda Lakes REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................... ............................... 1 TrafficGeneration .......................................................................................................... ............................... 1 Traffic Distribution and Assignment ............................................................................. ............................... 5 StudyNetwork Identification ......................................................................................... ............................... 9 Committed Roadway Improvements ............................................................................. ............................... 9 ExistingConditions ......................................................................................................... ..............................9 Background Traffic Growth Estimate ............................................................................ .............................12 2019 Operating Conditions ............................................................................................ .............................13 Proportionate Share Computation .................................................................................. .............................21 List of Figures Figure 1. Hacienda Lakes Site Location and Study Network ........................................ ............................... 2 Figure2. Conceptual Site Plan ........................................................................................ ..............................4 Figure 3a. Proposed Driveway Geometry .................................................................... ............................... 22 Figure 3b. Proposed Driveway Geometry .................................................................... ............................... 23 Figure 4. Improvements Within the Site ...................................................................... ............................... 24 List of Tables Table 1. Trip Generation Estimate .................................................................................. ..............................3 Table 2a. Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate - Daily ................................ ............................... 6 Table 2b. Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate — AM Peak Hour ................ ............................... 7 Table 2c. Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate — PM Peak Hour ................. ............................... 8 Table 3. Study Network Identification Table ................................................................. .............................10 Table4. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................ ............................... l 1 Table5. Background Growth ......................................................................................... .............................14 Table 6. 2019 Total Conditions Generalized Level of Service Analysis ....................... .............................15 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study i Hacienda Lakes Revised Traffic Impact Study Introduction Hacienda Lakes is a DRI- magnitude mixed -use development proposed for a 2,200 + /- acre site on the east side of C.R. 951 /Collier Boulevard that extends from south of Sabal Palm Road to north of Lord's Way in Collier County, Florida (Figure 1). Of the 2,200 acres, only 700 to 750 acres are considered developable uplands. The development is estimated to build out in approximately 2019, with the major land use components indicated in Table 1. A preliminary site plan of the proposed development is provided in Figure 2. This transportation analysis examines one phase of development, for which specific approval is desired. A revised traffic study response to Question 21, Transportation, has been prepared and is undergoing DRI review. This Traffic Impact Study is based on the same transportation analysis, but is formatted as a traffic impact analysis report. The proposed development generates more than 100 net new total 2 -way p.m. peak hour trip -ends, and significantly impacts one or more roadway facilities, and therefore meets Collier County's "Major Study" criteria. This revised transportation analysis was prepared in response to review agency comments and due to some changes in the proposed land uses. Previous to undertaking the original report preparation, a transportation methodology meeting was held on December 21, 2009. Appropriate assumptions, sources of information, and procedures to be used in the Hacienda Lakes transportation analysis were determined by the review agencies at this meeting. A summary of the transportation methodology correspondence is provided in Appendix A. Throughout this report, the term service capacity has been used to indicate the traffic volume a road may carry before exceeding an adopted level of service. This term has been used to avoid the confusion normally encountered in discussing traffic volumes and service volumes. Traffic Generation Traffic generated by Hacienda Lakes is estimated in Table 1. The trip generation estimate was based on fitted -curve equations or average trip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation (8th edition, 2008), as indicated in Table 1. Whenever available, the fitted -curve equations were used. If a fitted -curve equation was not available for a particular land use or time period, then the average rates were used. Hacienda Lakes is estimated to generate 34,598 daily, and 2,156 a.m. and 3,328 p.m. peak hour trips. The higher p.m. peak hour trips reflect the inclusion of retail land uses which typically are not active during the a.m. peak hour. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -1- PINE RIDGE RD EXT cn GREEN BLVD W G W � o J Q O m Q Ll OLDEN GATE PKY ° n O � z o U IRADIO RD.J 4� HAMMOCK RD N A Miles 0 0.5 1 2 Legend Significantly Impacted Roadway Network Scheduled Improvements Within Study Area Scheduled Improvements Outside Study Area Approximate Area of Developable Land Parcel Lands Collier Blvd: Davis Blvd to Golden Gate Canal Add Lanes 2011 i Davis Blvd: Radio Rd to Collier Blvd 6 Lanes 2011 Davis Blvd: Santa Barbara Blvd to Radio Rd 4 Lanes 2012 J 97 Hacienda Lakes Project Site San a1a +mod - - -� - --- - - - - -— - Figure 1 - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - -- Hacienda Lakes Site Location and Study Network Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study U) F H O = C Y CO d a a N a � •� F H O 2 Y A d a Z. W � 0 i r� V LL H M N_ V O N O O M (D 0 O 0 N O N N N M N 0 N t- COO M 000 Oro O N E Or M CD 00 0) C- N 00 O U. C- 00 N In M O Cn (O � M 'IT (0 CD V II n t` N A O O O N LO O N O 0 CV N CO Cl) II O N � O 00 O't N n Co Ln I O U) Co O CO T N M CD N 'I Cn '7 LO Cl Ln (n (O ct � 00 f\ Cf) O M M V) (D O M Cf) O CD N CA 00 M O O N N Mn O CO CD M CO (D 00 00 OD M to W N CD O Co O 0 (D Co Co N O Co N— N N C4 N-Ii 1- N c- c O a> E 7 7 7 7 7 7 .� O a a a a a a a N N N U N 00v v4Orn000o MLn Lo CD M r- O O O ((N N U') It N L L L L L Z? z L L Z W U U CO) U U U U U U U U a a a a a a a a a m a a a m ii ii LL ii ii ii ii w Q LL I1 ii Q O O O_ CD O_ O O_ O O_ O O O O_ M N N N N N ti N N N N N N N N Co f` � � Ln M N y O m m m c � _ _ 1: a a a C D L = E U U U _ O O O O O a N d N O c 0 � :? L U ` `.k d c M c M c (Mo O) 0 p N m C N LL d LL fU LL C_ to ;p E d E N c U C to N Co CAE O C ga .0 f V) Q (n Q (n (n (D Z Co w 7 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. -3- Z O O � H n i S i x L N i O O L � � U i o � n K O O N 0 M M 'I M Ch N w N m CN m E . U o 001 'NV' W) `.� 0 N M N T T d T a Co ,•c F M F o_ T C9 04 F.- N jj L p0 U co M r 1 L O to C14 O U CD Co LO N M 000 N r r 000 O Ono ;`.K Cl) N T O O Go ti Cl) 'IT 00f 00o i:: Ch 000 00 O O) M r N 0 In W tD n M N N N Co 0 CL a a H H H CO 0 C6 W O iC LU W O H ~ O to Z O O � H n i S i x L N i O O L � � U i o � n K Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study O O O � C O N N A Y c6 J w a a m s oo m E . U C7� e C _ N = °a � Cn C p .O C C6 O d C O a 0) o� ,•c F F o_ T C9 w F- p ch C6 jj L p0 U co 2 L O U) O U O Z Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study is I I Ii North Driveway: Right -In /Right- Out /Left -In Only - Stop Controlled I —1 . •• I I I I The Lord's Way: Full Connection – Signal Controlled FjC I Rattlesnake Hammock Road: Full Connection – Signal Controlled —' — — J Ir STOP' YIf South Driveway: Right- I • ut Only .. Controlled I I I � I Figure 2 Conceptual Site Plan Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Trafftc Impact Study -4- Traffic Distribution and Assignment Development traffic was distributed and assigned to the study network using a version of the Collier County MPO Cost - Feasible Plan FSUTMS model currently being used for transportation planning by the Collier County MPO's consultant. This model is slightly different from the version used to develop the MPO- adopted cost - feasible transportation plan because it had been updated by the MPO to reflect recent BEBR mid -range population projections. It was used at Collier County staff s request, and was provided to Tindale- Oliver & Associates by Collier MPO staff on January 21, 2010. New traffic analysis zones (TAZ's) were created to represent Hacienda Lakes, and the TAZ's were coded with appropriate land use data to reflect ITE -based traffic generation for the development. As indicated in Table 1, Hacienda Lakes will consist of a mix of mutually- supporting land uses that provide opportunities for trips generated by one land use component to be satisfied by another. Therefore, some trips will occur within the site and need not travel on public roads adjacent to the site. As a part of evaluating trip distribution, the FSUTMS model provides an estimate of internal capture between on -site land uses. In addition, during the methodology discussions, application of internal capture estimating procedures documented by the Institute of Transportation Engineers was requested. Both methods were compared, and found to be in reasonably close agreement. In addition, internal capture between residential and the proposed elementary school was assumed as 30 percent. This percentage results conservative when compared against the approximately 35 percent estimated by Collier County School Board (the School Board estimates that 324 students out of the 919 students to be able to accommodate the proposed elementary school will be "consumed" by Hacienda Lakes DRI). A summary of the estimated trip interchanges between on -site land uses is provided in Appendix B. Overall, the internal capture estimates resulted in PM peak hour external trips being reduced to approximately 85 percent of the total vehicle trip -end generation reported in Table 1. During the traffic assignment step, capture of trips from Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) adjacent to the commercial component of the site was considered. For the p.m. peak hour, the resulting pass - by capture estimate using ITE procedure is 296 trip -ends, or 148 trips, which would be approximately 3.6 percent of the future background traffic on Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), adhering to the "less than 10 percent" limit agreed to during methodology discussions. The net result of internal capture and pass -by capture estimates indicates that Hacienda Lakes is estimated to generate 27,759 net external daily, and 2,546 (1,342 inbound, 1,204 outbound) net external p.m. peak hour trip -ends. Tables 2a through 2c summarize the internal capture and pass - by capture estimates. The distribution and assignment of development trips is summarized in Table 3, and plots of the FSUTMS model output substantiating the assignment are provided in Appendix C. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -5- Table 2 -a Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate Daily Internal Capture Matrix School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 1012 Internal Capture: 304 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 7342 Gross Trips (outbound) 7341 Internal Capture (inbound) 1113 Internal Capture (outbound) 1166 External Trips (inbound) 6229 External Trips (outbound) 6175 External Trips (total) 12404 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 1861 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 931 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 931 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. -6- Internal Capture = 4,978 Capture Rate = 14.4% Gross External = 29,620 Net External = 27,759 Hacienda Lakes Traffic /nnpacf Stndr Residential Shopping Center Office Hotel Total In Out In I Out In I Out In Out 6,800 6,800 7,342 7,341 2,234 2,234 418 417 Residential In 6,800 808 45 0 853 Out 6,800 661 0 0 661 Shopping Center In 7,342 661 294 158 1,113 Out 7,341 808 220 138 1,166 Office In 2,234 0 220 0 220 Out 2,2341 45 294 13 352 I n 418 0 138 13 151 Hotel Out 417 0 158 0 158 Total In 16,794 Out 16,792 School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 1012 Internal Capture: 304 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 7342 Gross Trips (outbound) 7341 Internal Capture (inbound) 1113 Internal Capture (outbound) 1166 External Trips (inbound) 6229 External Trips (outbound) 6175 External Trips (total) 12404 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 1861 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 931 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 931 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. -6- Internal Capture = 4,978 Capture Rate = 14.4% Gross External = 29,620 Net External = 27,759 Hacienda Lakes Traffic /nnpacf Stndr Table 2 -b Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate AM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 372 Internal Capture: 112 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 189 Gross Trips (outbound) 121 Internal Capture (inbound) 25 Internal Capture (outbound) 20 External Trips (inbound) 164 External Trips (outbound) 101 External Trips (total) 265 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 66 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 33 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 33 Internal Capture = 202 Capture Rate = 9.4% Gross External = 1,954 Net External = 1,888 Tindale - Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Studv -7- Residential Shopping Center Office Hotel Total In Out In Out I n Out I n Out 234 815 189 121 304 62 36 23 In 234 8 0 0 8 Residential Out 815 9 0 0 9 Shopping In 189 9 8 8 25 Center Out 121 8 4 8 20 In 304 0 4 0 4 Office Out 62 0 8 0 8 Hotel In 36 0 8 0 8 Out 23 0 8 0 8 Total In 763 Out 1,021 School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 372 Internal Capture: 112 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 189 Gross Trips (outbound) 121 Internal Capture (inbound) 25 Internal Capture (outbound) 20 External Trips (inbound) 164 External Trips (outbound) 101 External Trips (total) 265 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 66 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 33 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 33 Internal Capture = 202 Capture Rate = 9.4% Gross External = 1,954 Net External = 1,888 Tindale - Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Studv -7- Table 2 -c Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate PM PK Hour Internal Capture Matra School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: Worst Case Scenario Assumtions: Student- to-staff ratio: Staff Memebers: Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour Student Related Trips: In: 68 Out: 61 (70 trips - 9 staff trips) 138 10.62 (obtained from Hillsborough County School Board) 87 10% 9 (outbound trips) 30% Students from Hacienda Lakes In: 20 (school inbound trips coming from inside Hacienda Lakes) Out: 18 (school outbound trips staying inside Hacienda Lakes) Internal Capture = 486 Capture Rate = 14.6% Gross External = 2,842 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 690 Gross Trips (outbound) 719 Internal Capture (inbound) 96 Internal Capture (outbound) 121 External Trips (inbound) 594 External Trips (outbound) 598 External Trips (total) 1192 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 296 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 148 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 148 Net External = 2,546 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -8- Gross Tri s ;Residential Shopping Center Office Hotel Out In Out In Out In Out tal 471 690 719 93 296 42 38 In 841 86 6 0 92 Residential Out 471 62 0 0 62 Shopping In 690 62 14 20 96 Center Out 7191 86 22 13 121 In 93 0 22 0 22 Office Out 2961 6 14 1 21 Hotel In 42 0 13 1 14 Out 38 0 20 0 20 Total In 1,666 Out 1,524 School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: Worst Case Scenario Assumtions: Student- to-staff ratio: Staff Memebers: Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour Student Related Trips: In: 68 Out: 61 (70 trips - 9 staff trips) 138 10.62 (obtained from Hillsborough County School Board) 87 10% 9 (outbound trips) 30% Students from Hacienda Lakes In: 20 (school inbound trips coming from inside Hacienda Lakes) Out: 18 (school outbound trips staying inside Hacienda Lakes) Internal Capture = 486 Capture Rate = 14.6% Gross External = 2,842 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 690 Gross Trips (outbound) 719 Internal Capture (inbound) 96 Internal Capture (outbound) 121 External Trips (inbound) 594 External Trips (outbound) 598 External Trips (total) 1192 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 296 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 148 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 148 Net External = 2,546 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -8- Study Network Identification The transportation study network for Hacienda Lakes was identified based on policies adopted by Collier County. These policies require that all regionally significant roads where traffic from the development consumes two percent or three percent of the adopted service capacity of the "existing and committed" road should be included in the study network. The two percent significant impact threshold applies for the first two road segments as traffic leaves or approaches the site, and the three percent threshold applies to segments beyond the first two segments. The net external p.m. peak hour development trip -ends on individual road segments, estimated as described above, were divided by roadway service capacities determined and published in Collier County's "Annual Update and Inventory Report" (AUIR) for roadways, for existing and committed roads, to identify the transportation study network. This analysis is summarized in Table 3, and the resulting study network is illustrated in Figure 1. Road segments denoted by gray shading in Table 3 are on the study network. Committed Roadway Improvements Adopted capital programs of Collier County and the FDOT, current at the time of this analysis, were reviewed and three "committed" road improvement projects (with construction funding scheduled within three years) were identified for study network roads. These improvements are: • Collier Blvd.: Davis Blvd. (S.R.84) to Golden Gate Canal, add lanes, 2011. • Davis Blvd. (S.R.84): Radio Rd. to Collier Blvd., 6- lanes, 2011. • Davis Blvd. (SR 84): Santa Barbara Blvd to Radio Rd, 4- lanes, 2012. Appendix D contains applicable excerpts from Collier County's adopted 2009 Capital Improvement Program and FDOT Work Program, and their locations are illustrated in Figure 1. These improvements were considered in the identification of the transportation study network, estimates of background traffic growth, and the assessment of future roadway operating conditions. Existing Conditions Existing 2009 PM peak hour, peak season directional traffic volumes were obtained from Collier County's 2009 AUIR for non -SIS roads and by multiplying the 2009 AADT volume estimates by the KI00 and the D factors reported in Table 4 for SIS roads. Existing (2009) roadway operating conditions on the identified study network are summarized in Table 4. Count data and adjustments are provided in Appendix E. The source and derivation of study network volumes and all assumptions used to derive these values are also documented in Appendix E. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -9- ti 0 .m a 3 Z a h E c' h C 3 c a J Hill w o -` Y2122 G 2 22 iiiii:2 G 2 22 C 21 D 1 222 32 2 C 1 2312 3p2 2 £ Ono 99e°mb >m m1 7 . 9� U y r N yoU W 8�28NN'NPA 4m AS X888 8C - �nx P*n 'R �n m v ^IN � °^off- 4 e 4 g e e g g R e 44 F8 s a� 5m m§ @ffi.IDIDa�� �. 1a ammo 0 R� tititi66 cidJ JJJticititici 6 ti � �tiiiJ vJ ' ti y N y° N 3 9 N vii U U U 0 0 0 0 U U U U U N U U1 N N N U O y p O O p p O p p p W W W W W p p p p W O p U W W W W W U p W� m K m w y R m m m m U~ Ws 0 2 m m r ¢ E E s E S 2 a Al l « .s g $$ q �aYSUm ¢ H N K y W W W E A A � FF a h E c' h C 3 c a J O O Rg O sa 8i o -6 E Nag 0 �v 8 FIT ;"l9fl-Ig SIT n I T > I a SIR i V< PIT I- a 9 I Ell- §IVIll- I Rrrl a Tl!q -1A 8 6 d d "I', 2 Qj� st --Ivlgll� vb E t: R �aa1a5���aaa��� =�E w w . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . uQuu. u 0 0 0 . . . U Q 0 u u 0 u 0 u u 6 6 d 6 6.6 6 6 d 6I.Ts 6.6.616 6 6 d .5 6 42 9 19 z m m 2; g; x m C C x G¢ �.8 U" Roo 0 Pi MN� U 0 u I II Vill I M s N q 61 I kkl 8 IE Li E E O Rg O sa 8i o -6 E Nag 0 �v 8 ® Existing M peak hour conditions on the stud network were identified b comparing the g p Y Y P g estimated 2009 PM peak hour, peak season traffic volumes with the AUIR service capacities documented in Table 3. The resulting conditions are summarized in Table 4. The study network consists of approximately 41.6 miles of road, carrying 87,915 peak -hour vehicle -miles of travel. The highest volume to service capacity ratio observed is 0.83, and the weighted average peak direction volume to service capacity ratio is 0.57, indicating that on average the road network is slightly over 50 percent full -- and substantial capacity is available in the network to accommodate additional travel. Background Traffic Growth Estimate Year 2019 PM peak hour traffic volumes on the 2012 existing plus committed non -state roadway network were estimated using the FSUTMS Model for the Collier County MPO provided to the applicant's consultant on January 21, 2010. Socio- economic data projections corresponding to the mid -range population projections of the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research for 2019 were provided with the model set. The Hacienda Lakes traffic volumes and background traffic volumes were identified using the "select zone" assignment procedures of the FSUTMS model. 2019 daily background AADT volumes were forecasted by: (a) subtracting the Hacienda Lakes select -zone traffic volumes from the total traffic volumes, (b) interpolating between 2000 validation model volumes and the 2019 volumes to estimate 2009 model peak season volumes, (c) determining the annual traffic growth rate from 2009 to 2019 based on the model volumes above for a "Method A" estimate, (d) determining the difference in 2019 and 2009 model -based volumes (taking into consideration the MOCF of 0.85) to be used for a "Method B" estimate, (e) applying the growth rate and the volume difference to the actual 2009 AADT counts to create two ( "Method A" and "Method B ") estimates of 2019 AADT, (f) examining the differences between the Method A and Method B estimates and usually averaging the two to develop a 2019 background AADT estimate. Averaging was chosen in most cases because the two methods produced very similar volumes. For state roads, the annual growth rates obtained by the method described above were compared against historic trends and the higher of the two was used in the analysis. In addition, in instances where the resulting annual growth rate was lower than 2 percent a minimum annual growth rate of 2 percent was used. Analysis of the historic trend in traffic counts on state roads are provided in Appendix F. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study 12 The segment - specific volumes were then reviewed on an area -wide basis by computing the vehicle -miles of travel on the study network. The model -based travel growth estimates indicate that an annual VMT growth rate of 36,569 daily vmt per year can be expected, and the Hacienda Lakes has used an annual VMT growth rate of 42,006 daily vmt per year. The model -based growth rate also indicates that the 2019 study network vmt will be 1.477 times the 2009 study network vmt, and the Hacienda Lakes has estimated the 2019 study network vmt will be 1.462 times the 2009 vmt. Thus, the background traffic growth rates used in this analysis are consistent with those of the BEBR mid -range forecasts, as incorporated into Collier County's travel demand model. This information is presented and summarized in Table 5. The resulting overall background traffic annual growth rate on the study network between 2009 and 2019 is 3.9 percent per year. The obtained annual growth rates were applied to peak hour volumes on non -SIS roads and on SIS roads resulting background AADT volumes were converted to PM peak -hour, peak season background traffic volumes using the appropriate "KIoo" (for SIS roads), and "D" factors, as identified in Table 6. The peak direction of background traffic on each segment was based on existing traffic flow patterns. Hacienda Lakes trips on each road segment were identified using a "selected zone" FSUTMS model traffic assignment procedure, which tracks the trips generated by the group of TAZ's in which the Hacienda Lakes was isolated. The resulting distribution of external Hacienda Lakes trips from the model was applied to the ITE -based trip generation estimate to estimate the PM peak hour Hacienda Lakes traffic. PM peak hour background traffic volumes were added to PM peak hour project traffic volumes to estimate total traffic volumes for the 2019 PM peak hour. Background traffic volumes and Hacienda Lakes traffic assignments for 2019 are indicated in Table 6. 2019 Oueratin! Conditions 2019 operating conditions were screened by comparing the estimated 2019 p.m. peak hour volumes with the AUIR roadway service capacity volumes. The peak direction of background traffic on each segment was based on existing traffic flow patterns. P.m. peak hour background traffic volumes were added to p.m. peak hour development traffic volumes to estimate total traffic volumes for the 2019 p.m. peak hour. Background traffic volumes and Hacienda Lakes traffic assignments for 2019 are indicated in Table 6. The total traffic volumes estimated as described above were compared against the roadway service volume estimates of Collier County's AUIR to establish a screening of locations where below standard operating conditions are expected, and where development traffic would meet or exceed the thresholds of significance. Table 6 provides a summary of estimated 2019 conditions at the significantly impacted locations. On only three road segments below level of service standard Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study 13 O O O L) L) I C < 0 9 E M 5E! E ci vi LL 25 I N , R Qa ni O M ! R TI T og 115 6 9f o6 —6 �e 0 'T VV o a I;` 1� mi ;R aL'notO tdonE ^r 6 ml Is l- 9 4 9 6 m mi I�i 6 4M -73 . . . 9 9 C m Ili 16 4 Ill N 13 m m v 6 4 d v 9 9 9 4 9 g Pi 9 N 'r m .614 6 j4,6 cq Pi cq R :g 09 m OMEN cd 6m 14 6 os -a t 6 cN 4 NN Ili 11 6 .6 n m .3 ma2N 14 lm -i A li mi c� 6 6 0 C6 c! m N E m m m m 8 m E E r 31 L m E :2 ER A 32 m W p A uj I A E E -d 6i 2 6 E E 32 ou w ole ci SE E.EEE" 'Wl.l 0 f f f x x x x . . . . . ED MD EE E 0 C) i Zi 6 L) L) I C < 0 9 E M 5E! E ci vi LL 25 I N , R Qa ni O M ti N fir& f f f If f I M-Wff I . ...... . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Ell yj� Fjq- R c 14 T m$ IN r F --A mow - FEIII WRR.0 M41MMIJI kh.. I I I I I I�I L I 999 7 7 . . 7 . . . . . . . . 00000 7 7 7 7 6-7 7 7 o lidd+ it A 19 71 ¢¢'S 6 6 b 6 a go ci l i i S O conditions are expected. On these three segments, and at site access points, more detailed intersection capacity analyses were undertaken to identify improvements that would restore the adopted level of service standards. These intersections are: • Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Golden Gate Boulevard West • Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Pine Ridge Road • Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Green Boulevard • Collier Boulevard (S.R.951) at Interstate 75 Ramps (North) • Collier Boulevard (S.R.951) at Interstate 75 Ramps (South) • Collier Boulevard (S.R.951) at Davis Boulevard • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at Northern Site Access (A.M. and P.M. peak hour analysis) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at The Lord's Way (A.M. and P.M. peak hour analysis) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at Rattlesnake Hammock Road (A.M. and P.M. peak hour analysis) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at Southern Site Access (A.M. and P.M. peak hour analysis) • Collier Boulevard (S.R.951) at Wal -Mart Supercenter Driveway • Collier Boulevard (S.R.951) at Manatee Road In addition to these intersections and pursuant to FDOT request, the following intersections were also analyzed: • Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Golden Gate Parkway • Tamiami Trail East (U.S.41) at Rattlesnake Hammock Road • Tamiami Trail East (U.S.41) at San Marco Road (C.R.92) Finally, pursuant to Collier County request, the following intersection was also analyzed: • Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Tamiami Trail East (U.S.41) Intersection turning movement volume forecasts are included in Appendix G. Levels of service were calculated using the following methodologies: Signalized Arterials Synchro (2000 HCMProcedures) Signalized Intersections Synchro (2000 HCMProcedures) Unsignalized Intersections Highway Capacity Software (2000 HCM Procedures) Capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix H. Table 7 summarizes the results of the capacity analysis. As shown in Tables 7 A, B, and C at the following intersections improvements will be required to achieve adopted performance standards: • Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Pine Ridge Road Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -16- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC • Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Golden Gate Parkway • Collier Boulevard (S.R.951) at Interstate 75 Ramps (South) Table 7a Arterial Level of Service Analysis Summary Roadway Average Speed [mph] Level of Service Direction -From ... 6AWW"i"W No" Collier Blvd Golden Gate Blvd. Green Blvd. 20.6 D NB Collier Blvd 1-75(S) Davis Blvd. 11.4 F NB S.R. 951 Wal -Mart Driveway Manatee Rd. 43.2 A NB At these intersections the following improvements are required: Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Pine Ridge Road • Construct an additional (for a total of two) northbound -to- westbound left turn lane on Collier Boulevard. • Construct an additional (for a total of two) southbound -to- eastbound left turn lane on Collier Boulevard. • Construct an additional (for a total of two) southbound -to- westbound right turn lane on Collier Boulevard. • Construct an additional (for a total of three) eastbound -to- northbound left turn lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Construct an additional (for a total of two) eastbound through lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Construct an additional (for a total of three) westbound through lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Construct a westbound -to- northbound right turn lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes Collier Boulevard from Green Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. All these improvements are consistent with the improvements identified by Collier County on Collier Boulevard from Green Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Golden Gate Parkway • Construct an additional (for a total of two) northbound -to- westbound left turn lane on Collier Boulevard. Collier Boulevard (S.R.951) at 1 -75 Ramps (South) • Construct an additional (for a total of three) eastbound -to- southbound right turn lane on I -75 Ramps. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -17- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Table 7b Signalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary Owl' " ° rsection Time Measure Overall EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Period V/C n/a n/a n/a 0.93 n/a 0.26 n/a 0.77 0.89 0.95 0.30 n/a n/a Collier Blvd at PM Peak Delay n/a n/a n/a 76.2 n/a 48.9 n/a 22.6 26.0 65.3 6.5 n/a 35.9 Golden Gate [sec] Hour LOS n/a n/a n/a E n/a D n/a C C E A n/a D Blvd V/C 0.98 1.16 0.34 0.69 1.06 n/a 1.08 1.30 0.52 1.05 1.05 0.19 n/a Collier Blvd PM Peak Delay 67.1 136.4 36.3 63.3 128.4 n/a 114.1 172.2 26.7 172.6 79.8 15.4 103.7 Pane Hour Ridge Rd LOS E F D E F n/a F F C F E B F V/C 0.95 n/a 0.25 n/a n/a n/a 0.78 0.95 n/a n/a 0.70 0.16 n/a Collier Blvd at PM Peak Delay 71.0 n/a 34.2 n/a n/a n/a 37.2 17.0 n/a n/a 10.1 1.1 23.0 Green Blvd Hour [sec] LOS E n/a C n/a n/a n/a D B n/a n/a B A C V/C 1.23 n/a 0.98 n/a n/a n/a 1.31 0.53 n/a n/a 1.02 1.02 n/a Collier Blvd at PM Peak Delay 161.9 n/a 87.3 n/a n/a n/a 158.7 5.9 n/a n/a 80.4 97.7 97.4 Golden Gate Hour [sec] Pkwy LOS F n/a F n/a n/a n/a F A n/a n/a F F F V/C n/a n/a n/a 0.89 n/a 0.28 0.93 0.46 n/a n/a 0.86 0.11 n/a Collier Blvd at PM Peak Delay n/a n/a n/a 75.4 n/a 45.7 7.7 2.8 n/a n/a 31.6 15.1 16.5 1 -75 North Hour [sec] Ramps LOS n/a n/a n/a E n/a D A A n/a n/a C B B Collier Blvd V/C 0.17 n/a 1.22 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.04 0.23 1.30 0.39 n/a n/a at PM Peak Delay 27.8 n/a 147.4 n/a n/a n/a n/a 51.6 23.5 261.5 1.6 n/a 61.6 1 -75 South Hour [sec] Ramps LOS C n/a F n/a n/a n/a n/a D C F A n/a E V/C 0.99 0.41 0.62 0.47 0.67 0.81 0.94 0.77 0.13 0.45 0.99 0.50 n/a Collier Blvd PM Delay 67.9 38.2 43.2 61.6 68.9 68.0 77.9 35.9 25.1 59.0 37.3 26.3 45.6 at Peak Davis Blvd Hour [sec] LOS E D D E E E E D C E D C D V/C 0.74 0.37 0.31 0.48 0.53 0.43 0.87 0.79 0.03 0.74 0.71 0.12 n/a Collier Blvd at PM Peak Delay 53.0 37.3 36.9 54.8 45.4 45.6 51.0 41.0 28.1 53.6 45.3 36.7 44.2 Tamiami trail Hour [sec] LOS D D D D D D D D C D D D D Collier Blvd V/C n/a n/a n/a 0.44 n/a 0.05 n/a 0.58 0.11 0.58 0.38 n/a n/a PM Peak Delay n/a n/a n/a 58.9 n/a 56.2 n/a 2.1 0.1 60.7 2.4 n/a 6.8 Wal-Mart Hour Driveway LOS n/a n/a n/a E n/a E n/a A A E A n/a A V/C n/a n/a n/a 0.80 n/a 0.69 n/a 0.96 0.15 0.95 0.67 n/a n/a Collier Blvd PM Delay n/a n/a n/a 72.4 n/a 63.2 n/a 42.1 15.2 75.9 9.8 n/a 34.4 at Peak [sec] Manatee Rd Hour LOS n/a n/a n/a E n/a E n/a D B E A n/a C Tamiami Trail V/C 0.97 0.98 0.14 0.78 0.94 0.09 0.82 0.70 0.33 0.78 0.97 0.22 n/a at PM Delay 75.7 49.3 21.3 72.7 54.5 31.4 76.2 58.6 52.1 58.9 78.8 42.8 56.9 Rattlesnake Peak Hammock Hour [sec] Rd LOS E D C E D C E E D E E D E Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Studj, -18- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Table 7c Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary Note 1: unopposed movement Table 8 summarizes the results of the "with improvements" capacity analysis. Table 8a Arterial Level of Service Analysis Summary With Improvements Scenario Time Movement Roadway Time Measure Intersection Speed Measure Direction iL [mph] Service On From To Period Period Collier Blvd 1-75(S) Davis Blvd. 17.1 EBL n/a EBT note 1 EBR note 1 WBL 0.02 WBT note 1 WBR n/a NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Tamiami Trail PM V/C 0.44 n/a 0.03 n/a n/a n/a 0.75 PM Delay n/a note 1 note 1 8.5 note 1 n/a 23.0 n/a 10.6 n/a n/a n/a at Peak San 36.1 [s 38.6 32.8 44.9 Hour Hour LOS n/a I note 1 note 1 A note 1 n/a I C n/a I B n/a n/a n/a Marco Rd E Note 1: unopposed movement Table 8 summarizes the results of the "with improvements" capacity analysis. Table 8a Arterial Level of Service Analysis Summary With Improvements Scenario Table 8b Signalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary With Improvements Scenario Time Movement Roadway Average Measure Overall Speed Level of Direction iL [mph] Service On From To Period Collier Blvd 1-75(S) Davis Blvd. 17.1 D NB Table 8b Signalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary With Improvements Scenario Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study 19 - Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Time Movement Intersection Measure Overall Period EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT FSBR Collier Blvd PM V/C 0.86 0.71 0.25 0.65 0.47 0.03 0.75 0.82 0.46 0.53 0.52 0.11 n/a P at eak D[sela, 54.3 47.3 39.0 61.2 54.6 51.4 60.7 38.5 36.1 62.4 38.6 32.8 44.9 Hour Ridge Rd LOS D D D E D D E D D E D C D Collier Blvd PM V/C 0.99 n/a 0.90 n/a n/a n/a 0.98 0.59 n/a n/a 0.86 0.68 n/a at Golden Gate Peak Delay [sec] 68.7 n/a 61.7 n/a n/a n/a 64.9 6.0 n/a n/a 48.1 88.1 52.9 Hour LOS E n/a E n/a n/a n/a E A n/a n/a D F D Pkwy Collier Blvd PM V/C 0.22 n/a 1.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.96 0.21 0.71 0.34 n/a n/a at I -75 South Peak Delay [sec] 35.5 n/a 70.1 n/a n/a n/a n/a 26.0 25.2 99.8 33. 0 n/a 37.8 Hour Ramps LOS D n/a E n/a n/a n/a n/a C C F C n/a D Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study 19 - Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC The major site access points illustrated on the master site development plan (Figure 2) were also analyzed. The site will utilize an internal collector road system to collect and distribute traffic from individual residential enclaves and building sites to the adjacent roadway network. The project is proposing four connections to Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), as follows: 1. North Project Driveway (right - in/right - out/left -in connection), 2. The Lord's Way (full connection), 3. Rattlesnake Hammock Road (full connection), and 4. South project Driveway (right- in/right -out connection). Traffic signals are anticipated to be required at the second and third of these site access intersections. Table 9 summarizes the results of the capacity analysis and Figure 3 illustrates the recommended geometry. Worksheets documenting the site access intersection levels of service and recommended geometry are included in Appendix I. No other major direct connections to Collier Blvd. are anticipated but a secondary entry point to the commercial area south of Rattlesnake Hammock Rd may be pursued at a later date. Such entry is not expected to be used by residents of the development, but would be a convenient entry point to the shopping areas for travelers on Collier Blvd. Table 9a Signalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary Project Driveway Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Studv -20- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Movement Intersection Time Measure Measure Overall EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR V/C 0.23 0.03 n/a 0.51 0.10 n/a 0.39 0.78 0.07 0.60 0.91 0.02 n/a AM Peak Delay 6312 61.0 n/a 49.0 40.7 n/a 49.4 16.1 2.2 69.9 32.5 13.9 26.8 [sec] Hour LOS E E n/a D D n/a I D B A E C B C Collier Blvd at V/C 0.28 0.04 n/a 0.84 0.10 n/a 0.49 0.99 0.10 0.71 0.71 0.02 n/a Lord's Way PM Delay 62.2 59.8 n/a 78.6 47.8 n/a 44.5 15.5 0.5 79.3 20.0 10.9 21.6 Peak [sec] Hour LOS E E n/a E D n/a D B A E B B C V/C 0.80 0.55 0.23 0.70 0.71 0.42 0.74 0.59 0.07 0.76 0.77 0.33 n/a AM Peak Delay 62.7 53.1 50.0 62.1 59.6 53.6 63.8 27.3 20.0 76.1 12.1 2.7 33.9 Collier Blvd Hour [sec] at LOS E D D E E D E C C E B A C Rattlesnake V/C 0.96 0.76 0.19 0.78 0.89 0.51 0.78 0.99 0.12 0.90 0.60 0.48 n/a Hammock Rd PM Delay 58.0 47.8 65.8 75.5 55.6 62.3 55.7 25.3 77.6 16.1 7.7 49.9 [sec] Hour LOS E E D E E E E E C E B A D Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Studv -20- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Table 9b Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary Project Driveway Note 1: unopposed movement Proportionate Share Computation As noted above, the following off -site improvements were identified as necessary to mitigate Hacienda Lakes project impacts: Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Pine Ridge Road • Construct an additional (for a total of two) northbound -to- westbound left turn lane on Collier Boulevard. • Construct an additional (for a total of two) southbound -to- eastbound left turn lane on Collier Boulevard. • Construct an additional (for a total of two) southbound -to- westbound right turn lane on Collier Boulevard. • Construct an additional (for a total of three) eastbound -to- northbound left turn lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Construct an additional (for a total of two) eastbound through lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Construct an additional (for a total of three) westbound through lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Construct a westbound -to- northbound right turn lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes Collier Boulevard from Green Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -21- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Movement Time Intersection Measure Period EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR V/C n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.12 n/a note 1 note 1 0.15 note 1 n/a AM Delay Peak n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 15.6 n/a note 1 note 1 15.2 note 1 n/a Hour [sec] Collier Blvd at LOS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a C n/a note 1 note 1 C note 1 n/a North V/C n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.20 n/a note 1 note 1 0.42 note 1 n/a Driveway PM Delay Peak n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 21.8 n/a note 1 note 1 30.2 note 1 n/a Hour [ LOS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a C n/a note 1 note 1 D note 1 n/a V/C n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.02 n/a note 1 note 1 n/a note 1 n/a AM Delay Peak n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 12.4 n/a note 1 note 1 n/a note 1 n/a [sec] Collier Blvd Hour LOS n/a n/a n/a I n/a n/a B n/a note 1 note 1 n/a note 1 n/a at South V/C n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.02 n/a note 1 note 1 n/a note 1 n/a Driveway PM Delay Peak n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 15.7 n/a note 1 note 1 n/a note 1 n/a Hour [sec] LOS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a I C I n/a note 1 note 1 n/a note 1 nla Note 1: unopposed movement Proportionate Share Computation As noted above, the following off -site improvements were identified as necessary to mitigate Hacienda Lakes project impacts: Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Pine Ridge Road • Construct an additional (for a total of two) northbound -to- westbound left turn lane on Collier Boulevard. • Construct an additional (for a total of two) southbound -to- eastbound left turn lane on Collier Boulevard. • Construct an additional (for a total of two) southbound -to- westbound right turn lane on Collier Boulevard. • Construct an additional (for a total of three) eastbound -to- northbound left turn lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Construct an additional (for a total of two) eastbound through lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Construct an additional (for a total of three) westbound through lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Construct a westbound -to- northbound right turn lane on Pine Ridge Road. • Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes Collier Boulevard from Green Boulevard to Golden Gate Boulevard. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -21- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC -All Figure 3a Project Driveways Geometry Intersection Geometry N Collier Blvd North Project Driveway at North Driveway Collier Blvd N Collier Blvd Lord's way at Lord's Way LJ � Ll Collier Blvd References: I=* Existing Lane =J New Lane Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -22- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Figure 3b Project Driveways Geometry Intersection Geometry N Rattlesnake Collier Blvd Hammock Rd at Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Collier Blvd N South Project Collier Blvd Driveway at South Driveway Collier Blvd References: b Existing Lane 1M* New Lane Collier Boulevard (C.R.951) at Golden Gate Parkway • Construct an additional (for a total of two) northbound -to- westbound left turn lane on Collier Boulevard. Collier Boulevard (S.R.951) at 1 -75 Ramps (South) • Construct an additional (for a total of three) eastbound -to- southbound right turn lane on I -75 Ramps. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -23- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC The project's proportionate share percentages of these improvements were calculated and it is summarized in Table 10. The detailed proportionate share computation is included in Appendix J. Table 10 Hacienda Lakes Proportionate Share Computation (1) Source: Collier County Capital Improvement Program In addition, Hacienda Lakes development will build several roads and dedicate right of way for the future construction of Benfield Road within the site that will serve not only the project but also the general public. Therefore, the portion of these roads that will serve the general public will be impact fee creditable. Table 11 summarizes the transportation impact fee credits resulting from the construction of this additional capacity to be available to the general public and these improvements can be observed in Figure 4. The detailed computation of this credit is included in Appendix K. Table 11 Impact Fee Credit Computation Commitment I Roadway Segment . „,,,. Total Roadway Segment Cost $1,369,412 Capacity Impact Fee Credit $0 Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. From Collier Blvd. FPL Easement Prop. II - Proposed Project � �•-- '° 0.0% $0 III Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. Location Improvements • Add (for a total of two) NBL turn lane on Collier Blvd. Before After Added Trips Share Cost Share $1,551,412 60.1% • Add (for a total of two) SBL turn lane on Collier Blvd. VI The Lord's Way Ext. Collier Blvd. Business Park West Ent. $3,286,589 67.1% $2,205,301 VII • Add (for a total of two) SBR turn lane on Collier Blvd. Business Park West Ent. Benfield Rd. $1,752,294 82.4% $1,443,890 VIII Benfield Rd. Collier Blvd. . Add (for a total of three) EBL turn lane on Pine Ridge Rd. $4,544,736 94.8% $4,308,410 IX Benfield Rd. South of Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. & North of The Lord's Way Ext. $472,500 from Green Blvd. • Add (for a total of two) EBT lane on Pine Ridge Rd. 6,638 10,177 3,539 178 5.0% $32,115,000 "I $1,605,750 to Golden Gate Blvd. • Additional (for a total of three) WBT lane on Pine Ridge Rd. $2,272,118 83.5% $1,897,219 Total Impact Fee Credit: $14,137,207 • Construct a WBR turn lane on Pine Ridge Rd. • Widen from 4 lanes to 6 lanes Collier Blvd. Collier Blvd. •Add (fora total two) NBL turn lane on Collier Blvd. at Signal Modifications ns 6,182 6,741 559 255 45.6% $ 1,032,160 $ 470,665 Golden Gate Pkwy. Collier Blvd. • Add (fora total three) EBR turn lane on I -75 Off Ramp at 9,057 11,125 2,068 615 29.7% $ 778,337 $ 231,166 1 -75 SB Off Ramps Signal Modifications ns Total $2,307,581 (1) Source: Collier County Capital Improvement Program In addition, Hacienda Lakes development will build several roads and dedicate right of way for the future construction of Benfield Road within the site that will serve not only the project but also the general public. Therefore, the portion of these roads that will serve the general public will be impact fee creditable. Table 11 summarizes the transportation impact fee credits resulting from the construction of this additional capacity to be available to the general public and these improvements can be observed in Figure 4. The detailed computation of this credit is included in Appendix K. Table 11 Impact Fee Credit Computation Commitment I Roadway Segment . „,,,. Total Roadway Segment Cost $1,369,412 public Benefit Percentage Impact Fee Credit $0 Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. From Collier Blvd. FPL Easement 0.0% II Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. FPL Easement Celebration Blvd. $1,369,412 0.0% $0 III Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. Collier Blvd. Celebration Blvd. $3,563,486 68.5% $2,440,988 IV Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. Celebration Blvd. Benfield Rd. $1,551,412 60.1% $932,399 VI The Lord's Way Ext. Collier Blvd. Business Park West Ent. $3,286,589 67.1% $2,205,301 VII The Lord's Way Ext. Business Park West Ent. Benfield Rd. $1,752,294 82.4% $1,443,890 VIII Benfield Rd. Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. IThe Lord's Way Ext. $4,544,736 94.8% $4,308,410 IX Benfield Rd. South of Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. & North of The Lord's Way Ext. $472,500 100.0% $472,500 X Benfield Rd. South of Sabal Palm Rd. $436,500 100.0% $436,500 XI Benfield Rd. beginning (south) Rattlesnake Hammock Ext. $2,272,118 83.5% $1,897,219 Total Impact Fee Credit: $14,137,207 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Study -24- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Commitment V 1 Commitment VI Commitment IV Commitment III Commitment II Commitment I J II I I Commitment VII 0 Commitment VIII Commitment XI i i Commitment IX I I _J Commitment X M Figure 3 Improvements within the Site 0 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes Traffic Impact Stugy -25- Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal CCPC Review Materials Traffic Impact Statement (Appendices) EW Appendix A Methodology Correspondence Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Phu wing and Engineering January 26, 2009 Mr. Mike Green Collier County Transportation Planning Division 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Hacienda Lakes DRI Transportation Methodology Meeting Dear Mr. Green: The purpose of this letter is to transmit a revised transportation methodology statement to guide the preparation of the traffic impact analysis for the Hacienda Lakes DRI. The revised statement addresses the issues discussed at our meeting on December 21, 2009 to review the draft, proposed methodology. In addition to ourselves, the meeting was attended by Mr. John Podczerwinsky of Collier County, Mr. Lawrence Massey and Mr. Gregory Kern (RS &H) representing the Florida Department of Transportation, and Mr. David Torres representing the applicant. In the meeting, we discussed the need to undertake a special site access analysis for the peak arrival hour for an event at the swamp buggy attraction. We understood that this analysis could be submitted under separate cover, and should address how the site will be connected to Collier Boulevard and address one concurrency segment to the north and south on Collier Boulevard. We appreciate the opportunity to meet with you, and if we have failed to accurately convey the intent of our discussions in this revised document, please let us know as soon as possible. Very Truly Yours, Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. William E Oliver, P.E., PTOE Senior Vice - President 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Bldg 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657 -9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -1 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. �. Planning wmd Engineering N Mr. Mike Greene January 26, 2010 Page 2 of 2 Enclosure: Transportation Methodology Statement Cc: Mr. John Podczerwinsky, Collier County Mr. Lawrence Massey, FDOT D1 Mr. Greg Kern, RS &H Mr. David Torres, Florida Star Development 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -2 TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY STATEMENT HACIENDA LAKES DRI Prepared for: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC. Prepared by: Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. January 25, 2009 619001 -00.09 COPR A -3 TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY STATEMENT HACIENDA LAKES DRI Introduction The Hacienda Lakes DRI is a mixed -use development proposed for a 2,200 + /- acre site on the east side of CR 951 /Collier Boulevard that extends from south of Sabal Palm Road to north of Lord's Way in Collier County, Florida (Figure 1). Of the 2,200 acres, only 760 to 860 acres are considered developable uplands. The development is estimated to build out in approximately 2019, with the major land use components indicated in Table 1. A preliminary site plan of the proposed development is provided in Figure 2. The transportation analysis will examine the development at build -out, for which specific approval is desired; however, the applicant reserves the right to sub -phase the development if desired. The land use quantities indicated in Table 1 are preliminary estimates, and are subject to adjustment as site planning is refined. 0 Table 1 Summary of Land Uses and Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimate C Land Use Units Phase One 1TE LUC P.M. Peak Hour Trips Single - Family (Detached) DU 691 210 598 Multi- Family DU 1,040 220 590 Hotel Rooms 135 310 80 Commercial/Retail Sq. Ft. GLA 375,000 820 1,542 Office Sq. Ft. GBA 75,000 710 112 In addition to the above land uses, a swamp buggy and/or other "special event" attraction is being considered, but the traffic generated by that operation is expected to occur during non- peak hour periods, so it's effects will not be considered as a part of the DRI analysis. The transportation analysis will be undertaken in one phase to determine the impacts the proposed development will have on roadway and intersection levels of service, to identify improvements necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service and, where applicable, mitigate development impacts of a regional scope. The applicant will submit the analysis as a part of the Tindale - Oliver and Associates, Inc. I Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -4 PINE RII)GE RD IN 0 PINE RIDGE RD EXT z GREEN BLVD w � � J o V I v RADIO RD �O �v r r Z O U RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD N A Miles 0 0.5 1 2 a, rn X U) Legend �I ;- Approximate Area of Developable Land FI-1 Parcel Lands Hacienda Lakes Project Site Figure 1 Hacienda Lakes Site Location Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -5 A..AMIAW MMMOrW AAkAnAnW C.MNIMML MAIW TRACE R M aZg iii CFO 4, %m Iii II TRACT %vx); kom) PF IR%(A R III H xAM1pIGC LARK —WA1EW MKW PROPGam Mr. TRACT C 1 RAC -I R TRACT R)74U RACI P: LL SAM[ PAINT ROM) li NT N�fYlR1� (DOW ISource: RWA, Inc. TRACI P A I HMO &N11 PMAn 1IM"I (m A - ATTRACTION TKWT ( - MMUDICUL P - PKSDW Tma PI - PJ&X FACT M TRACE MIS) PR - P*Ssw MXMTmk%L lw= R - FICIIIIII0,111AL TRACT &M- IIIIIIIIIIIINK / MIGINIL UK IRA CI A KU It 'IN %C'11' Figure 2 Conceptual Site Plan 1 inaale-Uliver ana Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI .January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -6 0 filing of an Application for Development Approval (ADA) of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI), pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Methodology The transportation analysis will be conducted using a version of the Collier County MPO Cost - Feasible Plan FSUTMS model currently being used for transportation planning by the Collier County MPO's consultant. This model has bee updated to reflect recent BEBR mid -range population projections, and will be furnished to the applicant by Collier County staff. Roadway operating conditions will be analyzed for the PM peak 250th highest hour using the detailed analysis procedures described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). At site access points, a.m. and p.m. peak hour analyses will be undertaken. Improvements to the existing plus committed road system needed to accommodate the DRI will be identified, and each improvement will be related to an appropriate percentage level of development. The analysis will be conducted in accordance with the assumptions and procedures presented Q below. During the methodology discussion, it became apparent that an interim submittal to present findings and confirm assumptions would be valuable. Thus, an interim submittal will be provided to address: • internal capture, • background traffic growth rates If adjustments to these procedures and assumptions are determined to be necessary during preparation of the analysis, review agencies will be advised and approval secured. Traffic Generation Rates -- Estimates of the P.M. peak hour traffic volumes to be generated by the Hacienda Lakes DRI will be based on rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (8th Edition) reference, using the land use categories identified in Table 1. In response to a County policy requiring all office uses to be evaluated using a "worst case" medical office use assumption, a limitation on the portion of office uses that will be allowed as medical offices will be proposed. Where multiple retail or office sites are proposed, the aggregate size of each site will be identified and the trip generation rate appropriate to the site size will be applied. The Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 4 Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -7 C. special generator data file (Zdata 3) will be used in the Collier MPO model to supplement the home -based shopping trip attractions to ensure the ITE trip -ends generation estimates are matched. Other appropriate ITE trip generation rates (or equations) may be applied if other land uses are introduced into the site. • Study Network Identification -- The transportation study network will include regionally significant roads on which traffic attributable to the development meets Collier County's "2 %/2 %/3 %" criteria. The extent of the study network will be determined after traffic generation, distribution, and assignment estimates are completed. The service volume estimates of Collier County's AUIR Report will be used to determine preliminary study networks for the analysis. • Inventory of Existing and Proposed Roads -- To identify planned improvements to the road system within the study network, the Capital Programs of the agencies responsible for transportation improvements in the area (e.g. Collier County, CAT, and Florida DOT) will be obtained. The status of planned and scheduled improvements will be excerpted from the Capital Programs of the appropriate agency. Improvements with construction funding scheduled within the first three years of the five year capital program current at the time the Transportation Methodology meeting was held (December 21, 2009) will be considered "committed" improvements for purposes of the analysis. County staff advised that the County's Capital program was undergoing amendments to delay certain improvements, and provided several alternative programs. As we undertake the analysis, we will identify where these changes may affect the results of the analysis. To document existing conditions, the applicant will make use of the most recent agency level of service databases and count data available, up to two years old. Any machine traffic counts collected by the applicant to support the traffic analysis will be less than one -year old, and will be recorded for a 48 -hour period. • Roadway Capacity Analysis — Links on the study road network will be analyzed for 250th highest hour conditions using the more detailed analysis procedures of the 2000 HCM /FDOT 2007 Ouality /Level of Service Manual. For intersections, Synchro software will be applied using the "HCS" method, rather than Synchro's percentile delay method. 10 V:C ratios of up to 1 /phf will be considered acceptable for some movements, provided Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 5 Hacienda Lakes DR[ January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -8 u overall letter -grade levels of service are maintained. The 250th highest hour, assumed to be the evening rush hour, will be analyzed. The average daily traffic, peak -hour volumes, directional traffic load, levels of service and roadway capacities will be reported, as required by the application questionnaire. Input values to the analyses, as well as output values, will be provided in the appendix worksheets. Factors to convert AADT volumes to 250th hour volumes will be based on information provided in Collier County's AUIR report. Roadway improvements will be identified where traffic attributable to the Hacienda Lakes DRI consumes five percent or more of the existing plus committed service capacity and the level of service projected at build -out of the phase being analyzed is. estimated to be below the adopted performance standard. Improvements required to provide the appropriate level of service will be identified in the analysis report. "Symmetric" improvements (e.g. improvements to accommodate the a.m. demands as well as p.m. demands) will be identified. Trip Distribution and Assignment -- Trip distribution for the Hacienda Lakes DRI will be based on distributions of population and commercial areas provided by the Collier MPO FSUTMS model, adjusted as described in the section on Traffic Growth Estimates, below. Adjustments to the assignment may be made adjacent to the site to reflect local site access conditions. For example, if multiple driveways to a commercial site are proposed, or some driveways with turning movements restricted, and only one TAZ connection is provided in the model, adjustments to the model assignment may be made to better reflect site specific access conditions. • Internal Capture /Adjacent Street Capture -- Estimates of internal capture and adjacent street capture will be based on the application of the procedures identified in the ITE Trip Generation reference and on execution of the transportation model and the consultant's judgment. The ITE procedure has been viewed as not always reasonable, so those worksheets will be provided, and if deviation is judged to be reasonable, an alternate internal capture assumption will be presented in the interim submittal. A matrix of estimated p.m. peak hour trip interchanges between on -site land uses will be provided. The proportion of background traffic captured from the adjacent street system will be Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 6 Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -9 checked for reasonableness and will be reported in the ADA. Supporting worksheets will be provided in the appendices of the analysis. Internal capture estimates will be reviewed against a 25 percent maximum rate, and pass -by capture will be limited to not exceed ten percent of the background traffic on adjacent streets • Traffic Growth Estimates -- Traffic growth will be estimated using information from the above - referenced Collier MPO FSUTMS model traffic assignments (2020 horizon year) and historical traffic count data collected by the Florida DOT and Collier County. To estimate future year total traffic volumes, a traffic assignment will be made using Hacienda Lakes DRI development plus the 2020 countywide socio- economic data discussed above. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic will be tracked throughout the FSUTMS model road network using a "selected zone" traffic assignment procedure, and will be subtracted from the total model traffic volumes to identify the "raw" background traffic volumes. Smoothing procedures will be applied to the raw background traffic volumes to estimate future year background volumes. Smoothing considers the accuracy of the model validation and results in adjustments to the future year volume estimates to refine future year traffic volume estimates. The 2020 model traffic volumes will be compared to the 2000 validation year model volumes to identify the traffic volume growth over a 20 -year period, and a pro -rata portion of the total background growth (e.g. 10 years / 20 years = 50 %) will be added to 2009 AADT count volumes to estimate 2019 background volumes. The DRI trips will then be added to the "smoothed" 2019 background volumes to estimate future year total volumes. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic on each link of the transportation study network will then be identified as the net external traffic from the site (e.g. after internal capture and adjacent street capture are considered). Traffic growth estimates will be reviewed to avoid negative growth, unless justified by the improvement of an alleviating parallel or new road. A requirement of Collier County's transportation concurrency procedures is that minimum traffic growth rates of no less than two percent per year on any road segment be used. This requirement seems to be contrary to the provisions of 163.3180(12)(b) and ® 16(b), F.S. This issue was specifically discussed, and prior to completing the transportation analysis, the growth rates from the new model application will be reviewed Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 7 Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -10 U 0`6�X'A' Florida Department of Transportation CHARLIE CRIST 2295 Victoria Avenue, Suite 292 GOVERNOR Fort Myers, FL 33901 February 2, 2010 Mr. Dan Trescott DRI Coordinator Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 1926 Victoria Avenue Fort Myers, FL 33901 STEPHANIE C. KOPELOUSOS SECRETARY RE: Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Methodology Statement — FDOT Recommendations and Comments Dear Mr. Trescott: The Florida Department of Transportation, District 1, has reviewed the methodology statement dated January 26, 2010 for the Hacienda Lakes DRI in Collier County. The Department offers the following recommendations and comments. 1. Page 4, Paragraph 1— The 100th highest hour is required to assess the PM peak period for planning purposes. Please update all 250th hour references to the 100th hour. 2. Page 4, Trip Generation Rates — The trip generation estimate should reflect the conceptual site plan provided in Figure 2 of the document. The commercial uses (Tract C) may be aggregated as they are all located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattle Snake Hammock Road. The three residential tracts (Tract R) should have separate trip generation calculations for each area. The residential/medical use area (Tract RIMU) should have a calculation for the residential portion and a calculation for the medical portion. ' 3. Page 5, Inventory of Roads — Traffic count data must be less than one year old. If existing counts which are an one year ola are tcgt m1=d)anayiaftpwcdd micreasect ny anhnnual gfdxntttirate to esfimate current owth rate to gstimate current }greater m �'11iefitV UJ�r r ^r th Ic i�ii�111111 i" CSVrI'fPr�ir:+ ��Y3�E11Xi}�;iaCt': i/ fa�'223 �j p4i. eau. �j*1#1106L 3 is #1 •. ,a.� .iii tls� n „i ti,it ] "ii'ff inli�� described on page 4 of the document.,ed or I ling is 4. Page 6 -7, Internal Captude /AdjaccUV$treet Cdlftune — Whilm¢}i"interrra�l eapttn-e rate deiling is eternal capture rate ce lations to proposed, the Department requires the(ttsdiof thed�'fE H.andbooks'stiatenial capture matrix caldtilations Ld capture matrix calc travel demand support the projected capture ratq)pnd volume. Thd Departinattt do¬ suppbtt the use of the trwvai(desn"drt the use of th model alone to determine internulduipture is Dot aecaptabintfor pieuelopmmitcapphaglioor this development application. through a 5. Page 7, Traffic Growth WinPat�e =r Backgrott�txaffiEst6bnMc prd*ati�meishduid be derived through a ; should be derive umbered trips, spreadsheet analysis that trackspbyatbadway sdgnieiithei ti%tbaffic,voluma trestirwed/eneundxked trijAne, reserved/en( and projected the annual growth rate (determined from the travebti --mk d model and.from histdrical trends), and projected �orical trends), ination of the future traffic volume (without the development). 11he �mbdel may be used to assist in the dttennination of theist in the deters e big annual growth rate as well as provide project trip distributietpand assignmantpercentagestto the highway t percentages to tl ay to o network. The Department doesatWaippdiitcthe method dirkeribedt iquthe dodunInntbbecauae it may bind to .iment, because it over - estimate future backgrouud,wFfic in the vicinity of the proposed developmaky of the proposed development. A-11 A-11 Mr. Dan Trescott Hacienda Lakes DRI Methodology Statement — FDOT Recommendations and Comments February 2, 2010 Page 2 of 2 6. Page 7, last paragraph — FDOT, District 1 requires the use of a minimum 2% annual growth rate for State roadway segment traffic volumes. The Department is available to discuss these comments at your convenience. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (239) 461 -4300 or lawrence .massey(&dot.state.fl.us. LLM/llm/rsh. E0 Sincerely, Lawrence Massey District 1 Growth Management Coordinator www.dot.state.fl.us A -12 Page 1 of 1 Fabricio A. Ponce From: GreeneMichael [MichaelGreene @colliergov.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:25 AM To: Bill Oliver; Massey, Lawrence; Kern, Greg; PodczerwinskyJohn Cc: David E. Torres; Dwight Nadeau; Fabricio A. Ponce Subject: RE: Hacienda Lakes DRI -- Transportation Methodology Bill: I have reviewed your letter of methodology and have the following comments: • You will need to clearly document the split between "Office" and "Medical Office" in the report. • Roadway improvements should be identified by either 5% impact and /or where the DRI causes the road to drop below the adopted LOS. Language reads such that both criteria are to be met before improvements are identified. • Distribution assignments and modifications to such based on local conditions and site access issues should also be approved by staff prior to use. Everything else seems to be an accurate reflection of our methodology meeting. Mike From: Bill Oliver [mailto:BOliver @tindaleoliver.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 5:51 PM To: GreeneMichael; Massey, Lawrence; Kern, Greg; PodczerwinskyJohn Cc: David E. Torres; Dwight Nadeau; Fabricio A. Ponce Subject: Hacienda Lakes DRI -- Transportation Methodology Mike and others, I've attached our revised transportation methodology statement for your review. Please advise me if anything has been incorrectly stated. We have received the model files, and are jumping into the analysis, and hope to transmit the interim submittal within approximately two weeks. William E. Oliver, P.E., PTOE Sr. Vice - President Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 N. Ashley Dr., Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33602 P: 813.224.8862 F: 813.226.2106 woliver(a)tindaleoliver.com www.tindaleoliver.com The information contained in this e-mail and all attachments are confidential and intended only for the use of the recipient. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized person. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communications is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please relay to the sender that you have received this communication in error; then delete the e-mail and any attachments. Thank you. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. A -13 2/2/2010 I�E u EIS relative to the concurrency procedures requirement and if this issue remains a concern, we will resolve them at that time. Based on the use of the very recent growth projections, no other developments were identified to be specifically considered as a part of the background traffic forecasts. Report -- A report documenting the analysis in the format of the questions asked in Question 21, Transportation Considerations, will be submitted. J: \--Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Methodology \Hacienda Lakes DRI Methodology 01- 25- 10.doc Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 8 Hacienda Lakes DR[ January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -14 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. PI'miling vid F.ngineeiing March 1, 2010 Daniel L. Trescott Project Service Manager Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 1926 Victoria Ave. Fort Myers, FL 33901 Subject: DRI #07- 0506 -175 Hacienda Lakes Transportation Interim Submittal Dear Mr. Trescott, This letter provides responses to comments of the Florida DOT dated February 2, 2010, and Collier County also dated February 2, 2010, regarding our January 20, 2010 transportation methodology statement. In addition, in accordance with that methodology statement, we are transmitting the "interim submittal" discussed therein, as Exhibit A to this letter, in the format of Question 21. Each of the FDOT's comments, then Collier County's comments, are typed in bold -faced font, with our responses following. We believe the statement as submitted, substantiated by the comments below and the interim submittal, comprises a complete and appropriate methodology. Florida DOT Comments: 1. Page 4, Paragraph 1— The 100th highest hour is required to assess the PM peak period for planning purposes. Please update all 250th hour references to the 100th hour. During the transportation methodology meeting, Collier County staff requested the use of the 250th highest hour, as used in their Annual Update and Inventory Report, as it is consistent with their concurrency management system. Since the local government sets and interprets the level of service standard on non -SIS roads, we will use their requested 250th highest hour factor on non -SIS roads. Since the FDOT sets and interprets the level of service standard on the SIS system, we will use their requested 1001h highest hour factor on SIS roads. A copy of correspondence from Collier County staff indicating no objection on this issue is enclosed in Exhibit B. 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Bldg 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657 -9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -15 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Planrnin and En;ineerin; Mr. Dan Trescott February 18, 2010 Page 2 of 5 2. Page 4, Trip Generation Rates — The trip generation estimate should reflect the conceptual site plan provided in Figure 2 of the document. The commercial uses (Tract C) may be aggregated as they are all located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattle Snake Hammock Road. The three residential tracts (Tract R) should have separate trip generation calculations for each area. The residential /medical use area (Tract R/MU) should have a calculation for the residential portion and a calculation for the medical portion. The comment is noted. The traffic generation estimate, included in the interim submittal document, is in compliance with the comment, but goes a bit beyond. We generated each non - residential land use separately, and created seven residential areas, rather than four (including the R /MU) as suggested in the comment. 3. Page 5, Inventory of Roads — Traffic count data must be less than one year old. If existing counts which are greater than one year old are to be used, they should be increased by an annual growth rate to estimate current traffic volumes. That growth rate should be developed as part of the applicant's interim traffic memo as described on page 4 of the document. AADT data from Collier County's 2009 Traffic Counts report were used, as well as counts from FDOT's FTI DVD for 1 -75. The 2008 counts on the FTI DVD were factored upwards based on historical trend. Intersection turning movement counts will be collected in 2010. The background traffic growth estimates are based on Collier County MPO's FSUTMS model and 2019 socio- economic data, which have produced an overall traffic growth rate of 4.4 percent per year on the study network. Growth rates on individual road segments vary from 1.0 percent to 14.2 percent, depending on the "denominator" traffic volume and where growth is expected to occur in southern Collier County. The lowest growth rate percentages were observed on US 41 near Naples, and the highest growth rates were on US 41 east of Manatee Rd. A table summarizing the traffic growth estimates on a segment -by- segment basis is provided in the "interim submittal" document. 4. Page 6 -7, Internal Capture /Adjacent Street Capture — While a 25% internal capture rate ceiling is proposed, the Department requires the use of the ITE Handbook's internal capture matrix calculations to support the projected capture rate and volume. The Department does not support the use of the travel demand model alone to determine internal capture is not acceptable for this development application. 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -16 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Planning and Eiigineeriug Mr. Dan Trescott February 18, 2010 Page 3 of 5 An overall internal capture estimate of 15 percent has been estimated using the ITE procedures, and we have used that rate. 5. Page 7, Traffic Growth Estimates — Background traffic volume projections should be derived through a spreadsheet analysis that tracks, by roadway segment, the existing traffic volume, reserved /encumbered trips, the annual growth rate (determined from the travel demand model and from historical trends), and projected future traffic volume (without the development). The model may be used to assist in the determination of the annual growth rate as well as provide project trip distribution and assignment percentages to the highway network. The Department does not support the method described in the document, because it may tend to over- estimate future background traffic in the vicinity of the proposed development. The comment is noted. The background traffic growth estimates we have developed are provided in the interim submittal for agency review and comment. During the methodology meeting, the applicant's consultant specifically asked the question regarding which other "approved but not yet built" developments should be specifically considered, and the agency response was that the 2019 socio- economic data developed to reflect BEBR mid -range population projections and the 1 -75 /CR 951 Interchange Modification /PD &E study in progress included all such developments, and no developments were identified for specific consideration. Again, a copy of correspondence from Collier County staff indicating no objection to this issue is enclosed in Exhibit B. 6. Page 7, last paragraph — FDOT, District 1 requires the use of a minimum 2% annual growth rate for State roadway segment traffic volumes. The use of the minimum two percent per year growth rate was specifically discussed during the methodology meeting, and the applicant pointed out that amendments to 163.3180(12)4.(b), F.S. indicated that growth rates should be constrained to the rates resulting from application of the BEBR mid -range population estimates. On two road segments, on US 41 near Airport Road and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, the BEBR forecasts indicate less than a two percent per year growth rate, and this reduced growth rate is supported by historical trend analysis. Supporting worksheets are provided in Appendix B of this response to comments. On the basis of the above, the use of less than a two percent annual growth rate is appropriate. Collier County comments: 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -17 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Planuirng and Eii, ineering Mr. Dan Trescott February 18, 2010 Page 4 of 5 1. You will need to clearly document the split between "Office" and "Medical Office" in the report. This will be done, as can be seen in the interim submittal. 2. Roadway improvements should be identified by either 5% impact and /or where the DRI causes the road to drop below the adopted LOS. Language reads such that both criteria are to be met before improvements are identified. The transportation analysis is being undertaken to address both DRI requirements and Collier County's concurrency requirements. Thus, for DRI and development order purposes, a five percent threshold may be used, but to address Collier County concurrency requirements, the County's 2 %/2 %/3% significance thresholds will be used. The comment seems to suggest that significance will be determined at any location where Hacienda Lakes traffic causes traffic to "cross the line" from acceptable to unacceptable, even if that location is beyond the geographic extent of the study network. Application of the two criteria separately, as seems to be proposed by the comment, would require study of many more road segments beyond the "2 %/2 %/3 %" study network, and the further study of only a few limited segments within the study network. However, the geographic extent of the study network is established by the "2 %/2 %/3 %" rule, and within that network, we propose to study all segments that are estimated to fail with total traffic (whether the failure is "caused" by Hacienda Lakes traffic or not). 3. Distribution assignments and modifications to such based on local conditions and site access issues should also be approved by staff prior to use. The proposed distribution and assignment are presented in the attached "Interim Submittal" for review. 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 0 Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -18 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1'lanuing quid Engineering Mr. Dan Trescott February 18, 2010 Page 5 of 5 In summary, we believe the methodology statement as written, as well as the interim submittal that accompanies this letter, accurately represents the appropriate procedures under DRI rules. Should you have any questions regarding the above or enclosed material, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. William E. Oliver, P.E., PTOE Senior Vice President Enclosures: Hacienda Lakes Transportation Analysis Interim Submittal Correspondence from Collier County Cc: Mr. Lawrence Massey, Florida DOT District 1 Mr. Greg Kern, RS &H, Inc. Mr. Michael Greene, Collier County Mr. Greg Podczerwinsky, Collier County Mr. David Torres, Florida Star Development, Inc. Mr. Dwight Nadeau, RWA, Inc. Mr. Ron Weaver, Stearns, Weaver, Miller, Inc. 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 o Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -19 Exhibit A Transportation Interim Submittal A -20 0 EXHIBIT A Question 21— Transportation B. Provide a projection of vehicle trips expected to be generated by this development. State all standards and assumptions used, including trip end generation rates by land use types, sources of data, modal split, persons per vehicle, etc., as appropriate. The acceptable methodology to be used for projecting trip generation (including the Florida Standard Urban Model Structure or the Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation rates) shall be determined at the pre - application conference stage. The traffic generation estimate for the Hacienda Lakes DRI is summarized in Table 21 -3. The trip generation estimate was based on fitted -curve equations or average trip generation rates obtained from Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8`b edition, 2008), as indicated in Table 21 -3. Whenever available, the fitted -curve equations were used. If a fitted - curve equation was not available for a particular land use or time period, then the average rates were used. C. Estimate the internal/external split for the generated trips at the end of each phase of development as identified in (B) above. Use the format below and include a discussion of what aspects of the development (i.e. provision of on -site shopping and recreation facilities, on -site employment opportunities, etc.) will account for this internal/external split. Provide supporting documentation showing how splits were estimated, such as the results of the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) model application. Describe the extent to which the proposed design and land use mix will foster a more cohesive, internally supported project. As shown in Table 21 -3, the Hacienda Lakes DRI will consist of a mix of land uses that provide opportunities for trips generated by one land use component to be satisfied by another. Therefore, some trips will occur within the site and need not travel on public roads adjacent to the site. Internal capture between residential, commercial, and office land uses were estimated using procedures and rates identified in the Trip Generation Handbook (ITE, June 2004). A summary of the estimated trip interchanges between on -site land uses is provided in Appendix 21 -A. Overall, the internal capture estimates resulted in PM peak hour external trips being reduced to approximately 85 percent of the total vehicle trip end generation reported in Table 21 -3. Table 21 -4 summarizes the internal capture estimates. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI\docs \Interim SubmittaNnterim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -1 A -21 EXHIBIT A fG N O O O N CO O N 00 O O O CO co E M N O N LO N— 00 N CO W ~ C r O L M d N L O +� O r- M O (0 (fl CO (0 M It 00 w V to C. :3 C\1 r-- Lf) M N O O 00 r- N C\1 M M N 'Cr N Y co J M d � N C a _d EXHIBIT A fG N O O O N CO O N 00 O O O CO O 0. O M N O N LO N— 00 CO CO ~ N N r H M N N L O +� O r- M O (0 (fl CO (0 M It 00 w to N :3 C\1 r-- Lf) M N O O 00 r- N C\1 M M N 'Cr tG d a C Lf) t` O O (fl O (0 (0 Lf) (0 N N N 00 o.— Lf) CO O LO V (D r- LO V V �� ��� t00 W) N R O Lf) m O� (- (o m m O O LO M o r- r- N CD O M Iq N Lf) O W T LO tt Q H L 3 ++ O 00 O V M (0 M (0 r M N V) a) = O LO --T M Lf) M (0 (0 M N N O O 14 O) O (n Y fG d CL C _ N 0 O � LO � LO M N (0 M 'zT � O � M Q — CO V LO O V O CY) N — (D L(9 Ln >1 (n V Lf) M CO CD 00 N Lf) 00 Lf) Lf) V O CO 0) It 0) N CO M N M CD 00 M r- 0) M Q 00 N Lf) O) CO (D 00 O M O OD N N N N (fl N P- N 0) r- (n Lry Cl) N N Q Q Q E 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 60 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 -6 w w y y N C C ` Q L L (D O O N Lf) (D O O O 0 Ur w 0 M N N O r N M K K V tv W W Lf) O (D O M F- C d L Z R _ 2 0 O CU M U U U U U U U U U -6 "6 -6 "6 -6 -0 -6 -0 N -6 (6 ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii Q ii Q 0 0_ o 0 M N N _0 N _o N N N N N N N ONO t� M 00 N C O a) (n 7 0 w 6) 6) 6) N3 O y H O O o O C 2 2 2 CO 6 d a) N N C E U V U C O 0 m m m U W f° c m c m c m 0 H m0 C m LL m LL m LL C m a a) —j 6) CO rn tT a c 6 N Q- .S Q .E 0. .E .0 N a) 0 — Q(nQ(nQ(n(nU:E2 cn h .N m c Q o) O N X _O CO N 0 0 QI O 2 m _am N Y m J a� c D U 2 0 O O O rn rn rn 0 0 C N U t Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DR] J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -2 A -22 N EXHIBIT A Table 21 -4a Hacienda Lakes DRI - Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate Daily Internal Capture Matrix Internal Capture = 4784 Capture Rate = 14.6% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 27,990 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 8018 Gross Trips (outbound) 8017 Internal Capture (inbound) 1150 Internal Capture (outbound) 1204 External Trips (inbound) 6868 External Trips (outbound) 6813 External Trips (total) 13681 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 2052 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 1026 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 1026 Net External = 25,938 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -3 A -23 Residential Shopping Center Office In Out 1,226 1,227 Hotel In Out 418 417 Total In Out In Out 6,726 6,726 8,018 8,017 Residential In 6,726 882 25 0 907 Out 6,726 722 0 0 722 Shopping Center In Out 8,01181111111111111111111111 8,0171 722 270 158 1,150 882 184 138 1,204 Office In 1,226 0 184 0 184 Out 1,227 25 270 13 308 Hotel In 418 0 138 13 151 Out 417 0 158 0 158 Total In 16,388 Out 116,3871 Internal Capture = 4784 Capture Rate = 14.6% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 27,990 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 8018 Gross Trips (outbound) 8017 Internal Capture (inbound) 1150 Internal Capture (outbound) 1204 External Trips (inbound) 6868 External Trips (outbound) 6813 External Trips (total) 13681 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 2052 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 1026 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 1026 Net External = 25,938 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -3 A -23 EXHIBIT A Table 21 -4b Hacienda Lakes DRI - Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate AM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix Shopping Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) Gross Trips (outbound) Internal Capture (inbound) Internal Capture (outbound) External Trips (inbound) External Trips (outbound) External Trips (total) Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips Pass -By Trips (inbound) Pass -By Trips (outbound) 205 131 25 22 180 109 289 72 36 36 Net External = 1,443 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -4 A -24 Residential Center Office Hotel Total In Out In Out In Out In Out 231 805 205 131 145 33 36 23 In 231 9 0 0 9 Residential Out 805 10 0 0 10 Shopping In 205 10 7 8 25 Center Out 131 9 4 9 22 Office In 145 0 4 0 4 Out 33 0 7 0 7 In 36 0 9 0 9 Hotel Out 23 0 8 0 8 Total In 617 Out 992 Internal Capture = 94 Capture Rate = 5.8% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 1,515 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) Gross Trips (outbound) Internal Capture (inbound) Internal Capture (outbound) External Trips (inbound) External Trips (outbound) External Trips (total) Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips Pass -By Trips (inbound) Pass -By Trips (outbound) 205 131 25 22 180 109 289 72 36 36 Net External = 1,443 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -4 A -24 EXHIBIT A Table 21 -4c Hacienda Lakes DRI - Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate PM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix Internal Capture = 41JU Capture Rate = 14.8% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 2,658 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 756 Gross Trips (outbound) 786 Internal Capture (inbound) 103 Internal Capture (outbound) 123 External Trips (inbound) 653 External Trips (outbound) 663 External Trips (total) 1316 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 328 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 164 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 164 Net External = 2,330 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -5 A -25 Shopping Gross Residential In Out Center In I Out Office In Out Hotel In Out Total Trips 833 465 756 786 51 147 42 38 Residential In 833 94 3 0 97 Out 465 68 0 0 68 Shopping In 756 68 15 20 103 Center Out 7861 94 16 13 123 Office In 51 0 16 0 16 Out 147 3 15 1 19 Hotel In 42 0 13 1 14 Out 38 0 20 0 20 Total In 1 1,682 Out 1 1,436 Internal Capture = 41JU Capture Rate = 14.8% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 2,658 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 756 Gross Trips (outbound) 786 Internal Capture (inbound) 103 Internal Capture (outbound) 123 External Trips (inbound) 653 External Trips (outbound) 663 External Trips (total) 1316 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 328 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 164 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 164 Net External = 2,330 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -5 A -25 EXHIBIT A D. Provide a projection of total peak hour directional traffic, with the DRI, on the highway network within the study area at the end of each phase of development. If these projections are based on a validated FSUTMS model, state the source, date, and network of the model and of the TAZ projections. If no standard model is available or some other model or procedure is used, describe it in detail and include documentation showing its validity. Describe the procedure used to estimate and distribute traffic with full DRI development in subzones at build out and at interim phase -end years. These assignments may reflect the effects of any new road or improvements which are programmed in adopted capital improvements programs and /or comprehensive plans to be constructed during the DRI construction; however, the inclusion of such roads should be clearly identified. Show these link projections on maps or tables of the study area network, one map or table for each phase -end year. Describe how these conclusions were reached. Year 2019 PM peak hour traffic volumes on the 2012 existing plus committed roadway network were estimated using the FSUTMS Model for the Collier County MPO provided to the applicant's consultant on January 21, 2010. Socio - economic data projections corresponding to the mid -range population projections of the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research for 2019 were provided with the model set. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic volumes and background traffic volumes were identified using the "select zone" assignment procedures of the FSUTMS model. 2019 daily background AADT volumes were forecasted by: (a) subtracting the Hacienda Lakes select -zone traffic volumes from the total traffic volumes, (b) interpolating between 2000 validation model volumes and the 2019 volumes to estimate 2009 model peak season volumes, (c) determining the annual traffic growth rate from 2009 to 2019 based on the model volumes above for a "Method A" estimate, (d) determining the difference in 2019 and 2009 model -based volumes (taking into consideration the MOCF of 0.85) to be used for a "Method B" estimate, (e) applying the growth rate and the volume difference to the actual 2009 AADT counts to create two ( "Method A" and "Method B ") estimates of 2019 AADT, (f) examining the differences between the Method A and Method B estimates and usually averaging the two to develop a 2019 background AADT estimate. Averaging was chosen in most cases because the two methods produced very similar volumes. For 1 -75, a two percent per year annual growth rate was applied per FDOT direction, as the model -based methods resulted in a lower growth rate. On U.S. 41 east of C.R. 951, the higher, difference method (Method B) was applied because Method A seemed to produce low estimates of growth. The segment - specific volumes were then reviewed on an area -wide basis by computing the vehicle - miles of travel on the study network. The model -based travel growth estimates indicate that an Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -6 A -26 EXHIBIT A annual VMT growth rate of 37,513 vmt per year can be expected, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI has used an annual VMT growth rate of 40,339 vmt per year. The model -based growth rate also indicates that the 2019 study network vmt will be 1.494 times the 2009 study network vmt, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI has estimated the 2019 study network vmt will be 1.492 times the 2009 vmt. Thus, the background traffic growth rates used in this analysis are consistent with those of the BEBR mid -range forecasts, as incorporated into Collier County's travel demand model. This information is presented and summarized in Table 21 -5. The resulting overall background traffic annual growth rate on the study network between 2009 and 2019 is 4.1 percent per year. The resulting background AADT volumes were converted to PM peak -hour, peak season background traffic volumes using the appropriate "K250 "(for non -SIS roads) or "K,00" (for SIS roads) and "D" factors, as identified in Table (21 -5). The peak direction of background traffic on each segment was based on existing traffic flow patterns. Hacienda Lakes DRI trips on each road segment were identified using the "selected zone" assignment procedure which tracks the trips generated by the group of TAZ's in which the Hacienda Lakes DRI was isolated. The resulting distribution of external Hacienda Lakes DRI trips from the model was applied to the ITE -based trip generation estimate to estimate the PM peak hour Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic. PM peak hour background traffic volumes were added to PM peak hour DRI traffic volumes to estimate total traffic volumes for the 2019 PM peak hour. Background traffic volumes and Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic assignments for 2019 are indicated in Table 21 -6. E. Assign the trips generated by this development as shown in (B) and (C) above and show, on separate maps or tables for each phase -end year, the DRI traffic on each link of the then - existing network within the study area. Include peak -hour directional trips. If local data is available, compare average trip lengths by purpose for the project and local jurisdiction. For the year of build out, and at the end of each phase, estimate the percent impact, in terms of peak hour directional DRI trips /total peak hour directional trips and in terms of peak hour directional DRI trips /existing peak hour service volume for desired LOS, on each regionally significant roadway in the study area. Identify facility type, number of lanes and projected signal locations for the regionally significant roads. DRI project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study network by Collier County's Transportation Systems Planning Model, as described above. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic assignment is indicated in Table 21 -7. During the traffic assignment step, capture of trips from Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) adjacent to the commercial component of the site was considered. For the PM peak hour, the resulting pass -by capture estimate using ITE procedure was 328 trip -ends, or 164 trips, which would be Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI\docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -7 A -27 Table 21 -5 2019 Background Traffic Growth Segmad flewil l Vallee 2008 Raw MotlN Vallena Iman poW d Annwl An,," RMa Adl-W Annual Growth Rate "t 2008 -207 AADT Growths' 2008 0.ADT {r «I wm10 1018 AADT Resulting Average Annual Growth Comm- en Segment Length Imi) Motlat -beaed VMT (ePPllsd MOCF 0(0.88) MDTEarknme beaW VMT On From To 1000 ans Method m Metnotl M Ihede1 Rate pp0 1018 2000 211➢ Devi Ukd R.I. Rd. G.R.951 8780 39.765 2 -.45\ 703, 70'•rt. 13862 20,340 34.481 34,312 34,342 69% 071_ 5,299 23,886 14,441 24, ..d, Ell (CR951 Ploe Pod eRd C--aw 20.213 60.625 29.885 36 °.1. 36'1. 9133 26,619 36,231 35,782 36,007 3.5% 193 33.159 fib. SM 51,433 89, 2dlie, BIW. CAW Green ENd Golden Gate Pkw. 20,781 36235 28.149 249% 2.9% s958 26,649 34,399 33,607 34003 2,8% 193 34,091 59,608 51,433 65 -ore, Bho. CRol Golden G"' 1 -75 N' 10511 39.005 24008 6.2% 6.2% 12747 21,868 35528 34.615 OM 6.0% 166 14,831 55.036 36.301 58 lvd Iier B. (C R.951) 1-75(S) Doris -d. 32,438 73,966 52119 42% 42% 18,587 41.655 59,132 60,242 59,887 43% 038 iDAT7 23.897 15,829 22,681 dllerBMd. (CR.951) DMS9Nd. Lord's Aby 25,821 92,973 1 33,846 1 2.7% 23% 7,673 26416 33479 34,779'3379!7 28% 220 48,285 80, 58.781 74 her BNtl. {CR.951 LdCS RBMesMke HamngkRd. 25,821 42973 33,816 2.7% 2.7% 7673 %, 33.179 34,118 33,799 28% 092 70,792 33. 24.330 37 Iier BIW. {CR.951 Rettesnake HMmnodt Rd. L Cllurtl 26,368 46032 36630 3.1% 3.1% 9fi92 18,P6 24,620 28,166 26564 461% 038 8,517 15514 7,135 10087 Iier BNd, (C R,951 Ld CLIWrd U.S 41 22.811 42526 3 149 302% 3.2% 8620 19.004 25.137 27,824 26.481 3.9% 303 58,750 109523 57,582 80.237 . R.951 U.S 4t T-r Rtl. 32,527 54q 174 42781 27% 27% 9fi84 280617 36238 38.301 7270 3.0% 074 20459 34 D75 21 17' 27.E .R951 Tow., RI Maneles Rtl, 32.339 65,212 47,910 3.6% 36% 14.707 286617 38952 43.324 41,13E 44% 034 9346 16646 9730 13.98 R 951 Menstse Rd. Mensal v. 29.188 55321 41,567 3.3% 3.3% 11691 22878 30448 34.569 32,509 4.2% 345 85,594 162.229 78929 1121 edl. Rd. Lmn Rtl. Be- Berbera am 13.764 39,743 26,070 52% 52% 11622 19.178 29236 30.660 30.018 5.N,� 201 23.516 67.9D1 38546 W adig Rd. S-W Serbaa S. S. R 94(Davis Blvd) 2.411 21,445 11,427 86% 88% 8,515 9217 17298 17,732 17,515 90% 134 2748 24.426 12351 23,4 eleewake Hmk R1 U6.41 Clleow eBwl MAO 935 2 282 2.4% 24% 4805 22835 28,379 27,840 28,010 2.3% aW 12,373 !9678 18206 22.408 ellesake Hmk Rd. Cherkma BtA C u eam Rd. 12,277 26,098 1&350 3.7% 347% 736 13,261 18.138 1987 18,568 1.0% 040 4,174 8,533 5.304 7427 W11 -aHmk Rd. Cw Bee Rd. Sane Bertsie&W. 7.547 25,456 18,030 5.9% 59% 8,012 12487 19830 20.499 20,165 6.1% 075 4811 16228 9,365 15,124 elteslake Hmk Rd. Sank Serowe BIW. C.R.951 2.889 22,843 12341 8.5% 8.5% 8,927 8.529 15,787 17,456 16,622 95% 190 4,666 36691 16,205 31.582 M Bamea Bw. Redla Rtl, S.R84 Denis BIW' 19,872 48,970 33,655 4.6% 4.6% 13,018 32997 48,013 46015 47,014 42% 195 17,736 43,7 34617 49. nor BMbere Ext S.R 84 Davis BIW RattleaMee Hemenk Rd. n/a 4$757 rW Ne h& nk n/4 IM 37,193 37,193 nk Role 6. 205 0 76247 0 76,2 -75 Golden Gek C.1 -EAv, 60.794 67,600 64,018 0.6% 20% 3045 32500 39.000 35,545 39,000 2.0% Note 7. 3.30 170.527 169618 107250 128 amlami Trail Ead De4s BNd. at Rd. 4069'. 53,976 47,084 15% 15% 5.8.58 30,(46 35187 36,552 35,870 17% 126 43784 57808 ,'7'i 674 451 -I Trail Eat Airport Rd. RION.eke Hemrrak Rd. 52.857 64.050 68.164 10% 10% 5.(03 44.146 48,613 49,149 48,881 1.1% 160 75943 92.0)9 74,607 82 smleml Tre9 Ees1 CallerBW9 Manatee Rd. 12.104 33,189 22,092 5.0% 5096 9,432 11,978 17995 21,410 19,703 64% 167 17.182 47.11 20,003 32,904 nnhkml MI aa1 Me- Rtl r� - 10,569 31429 W 54% 54% 1 W 4,:K'� 6.712 13,70E 13.706 214% NMe 8. 172 154M 45. 7509 2.1574 mr 1Trail Eat Greerw Rd. Six LS From Rtl. 8.091 29,703 18.330 6.2% 62% 9.607 4.385 7.073 14.032 14,032 22.1% Nole 8. 2.46 16925 62.3 10,738 3451 Nolen: Annual lnaease m VMT: r x37,513 �01 40,339 (1)1 Percent Average AnnW Growth Rate Minimum - Wed M McMod A2019 MDT Estimate Ratio or WIT (2D09 m 201 g): 1.494 � ► 1.492 (2) 2009 RMV =12379 RMV -2000 RMV) x MOCF - Collier County MOCF = 0.85 - Used to Method B 2019 AADT Eelilr®k (3)Metimd A 2719 MDT =200BMDTx(1 +lAnW Growth Rtex(2)19- 2009))) Es6Model Annual Increase Corparison. 108 (4)Mearod82019 MDT: 3p9AADT +(200 &2119) MDT Growth Est/Model Ratio Com{mrison'. 1.00 (5) Dried 2119 AADT: (Method A 2019 AAM +Method 2 2019 MOT) 12 (6) ObktMd es 2719 RMV x MOCF Model forecasts 37,500 vet increase per year, we're using 40,399. - Conservative! (7) !teed 2%es Sls read. (8) Wed tk .MelhodB Model forecasts 2019 vmt will be 1.494 times 2009 vmt (2009 volumes are based on interpolated 2009 between 2000 and 2019). We're matching that ratio! Overall growth in travel on the study network is 4.1% per year. Tindek -0Iiwxmd Asmniates Inc. 1: \- Client 660 -699 \6190()14)0.09- Haeimde Lakes DRINI -1 tenor Submilkt.Nlenm Su1mliaa120100225.do N1 H.iende Lakes DR] 21 -8 Table 214 2019 Generalized L.-I of Service Analysis EXHIBIT A OEM m I I m E m NO I So m m m m M 111111101 TindOc-OlimandAswimes, Inc, 14, 11121 A-n Nn 0 EXHIBIT A approximately 6.5 percent of the future background traffic on Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), adhering to the "less than 10 percent" limit agreed to during methodology discussions. The number of net new external PM peak hour vehicle trips attributable to the Hacienda Lakes DRI assigned to the road network was 2,330 trips (1,288 inbound, 1,042 outbound). F. Based on the assignment of trips as shown in (D) and (E) above, what modifications in the highway network (including intersections) will be necessary at the end of each phase of development, to attain and maintain local and regional level of service standards? For those improvements which will be needed earlier as a result of the DRI, indicate how much earlier. Where applicable, identify Transportation System Management (TSM) alternatives (e.g. signalization, one -way pairs, ride - sharing, etc.) that will be used and any other measures necessary to mitigate other impacts such as increased maintenance due to a large number of truck movements. The total traffic volumes estimated as described above were compared against the roadway service volume estimates of Collier County's Annual Update and Inventory Report to establish a screening of locations where below standard operating conditions are expected, and where development traffic would meet or exceed the thresholds of significance. To address Collier County's concurrency regulations, a "2 %/2 %/3 %" threshold of significance was used, where the 2 percent threshold was applied on the first and second roadway segments as one departs from the site, and three percent thereafter. These thresholds of significance are more stringent than those required by DRI statues, an issue which may affect subsequent Development Order discussions. The significantly impacted are can be observed in Figure 21 -1. Table 21 -7 provides a summary of these locations. In accordance with discussions during the transportation methodology meeting, it is not expected that every signalized intersection on the study network be evaluated, as this would entail data collection and analysis of a substantial cost. 36 signalized intersections are included in the study network. However, only four signalized intersections are located on segments estimated to be both significantly and adversely impacted, and they are proposed to be analyzed during the p.m. peak hour. Three additional intersections at site driveways would also be analyzed, these during the a.m. peak hour as well as the p.m. peak hour. These intersections are: • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at I -75 (North) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at I -75 (South) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at Davis Boulevard • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at Rattlesnake Hammock Road • S.R. 951 at Manatee Road • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at Northern Site Access • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at The Lord's Way Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -10 A -30 WAW EXHIBIT A Figure 21 -1. Significantly Impacted Study Area 45 0 10T `Big Caress swamp a N N N Rye Pine Ridge Rd Pine Ridge Rd 655 Pine Ridge Rd 951 White Blv nl 11 th Ave : N a 5 m < "`107 12th Ave SW N N N 14th Ave SW p Al N 651 Green Blvd u 41 ado c� 31 Ka Hun r ,,, i m O m Wa Way w Golden Gat- CD v T CL e} BBC 0 O Ke 3 S, C ?J p1dBR .Gate Pk Y Golden Gate Pky w m _ 9 ?� - x n 666 m 32nd Ave SW a v 45 h Souteast Land (P L Acquisition Off 0e &4i)'_ 661 ._..._ cn Eve N Radio Rd Rarlir, ar+ r . _. 84 North Rd North 'Rd y 41L, Estey Ave-a oast Naples 2 Naples Davis Blvd a _ o r,: ¢ CL 4 N to N c n O d m Pori tb Q. „Royal b 41 31 Andrevh Sat>al Palm Rd we, Maple Ln . Naples Manor Co d _m 0 U 90 JZ It Q\ c �o � Q. o C N ��1 Manatee Ru fl Belle ,c Meade Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09 - Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -11 A -31 EXHIBIT A Table 21 -7 Study Network Identification Table Note 1: T61s percentage ndWes Internally capNred tops using Ne exlemal roadway rielwork. TMraf «e, ttre rasoNrg vdume is �g�ar tpal me cwrespoMing to tM motlal airlamal Vip essgnment. Tiedale- Oliver and Associates. Inc. Hacienda Lake, DRI J: \- Client 600- 699 \619001- 00119 - Hacienda Lakes DRldocaVnterim Suhndnal \Imerim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21_12 A -32 0 G�3:T�f'?"i}!'1kO * IF��JIm�E7Cf` �": 1��71�6"!�CJ�II['�IIELLI�IF':' ®0m•0m ®mm ®mom mmmmmmmm ��� .,.Tm•�om• ©�m.�mm����mm��mmmm � ®mm. ©m�m.��m��ma ®mmmmmmmm �^�[>_mm• ©[�mt�mm��moa ®mmmmmmmm ��>_mmo[��mmm�a,�� ®mmmmmmmm ��� ¢�a�>_mm•o�m.�m�,zem ®m ® ®mmmmm ®m Note 1: T61s percentage ndWes Internally capNred tops using Ne exlemal roadway rielwork. TMraf «e, ttre rasoNrg vdume is �g�ar tpal me cwrespoMing to tM motlal airlamal Vip essgnment. Tiedale- Oliver and Associates. Inc. Hacienda Lake, DRI J: \- Client 600- 699 \619001- 00119 - Hacienda Lakes DRldocaVnterim Suhndnal \Imerim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21_12 A -32 0 Appendix B Trip Generation Estimate 17! � E* a) W^ i 0 w i 0 .L= f6 M M N m N O O M (0 O O 0 00 N N w w Y) - 0 _ N 1 11 � �l Q. 0 V N M N N N N +-' h h 7 O N I` I` It O LO N T O 00 l le N N 1 14 0 Q N I- (O M M M O N I� M O O) L L) 0 N t9 d d 1 C U 19 00 - 0) I` N 00 O LO h 00 (14 - -4 O O N N a - O O L M O O I M M N N O _ (D 0 00 N — I _ O 0 1 1n 0 00 0. 0 N N N M M a a- O O 0 00 H N r r r r +-' O O N LO (D M "t (0 d' N t` M 0 00 h h e eT = O r U7 V O U) M (0 (D N N M (D N 0 00 c co � �A r r r r r 0) a N N LO U) N LO M (D h U) (D M M P P- Q - N M M ' (D O O C Cl) >+ to 0 0 O .- (D N O w M (D O N N U) w w O O 0 0) •� ,�' O O O M ID (D d' M M M LO _ M M M N N ( (n H O O N (D O M (D w 0 M O N O M N N w w h h N N N N4 N t ti 0 01 r r� a a a c c C N CD E� 7 7 C 7 7 7 7 0 H H CO C C C C C C It L ` L LO M x x x LOO 0 m + W W W t4 O O O m +' M N H N N d d O Z Z C7 � � is H N N 0 0 H m m m m a) a) a) 0 m 0 N N m Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z > > 7 7 n 7 7 7 C 7 7 U U U U U U U U m U U U > ._ > LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Q LL LL LL Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N h N— 0 00 O N C O O - - In 7 w w 0 L O O _ L L C O _ 0 7 3 3 C C O O O 0 0 C E E S 2 2 @ @ lC O O N N C C C O O _ i i) 0 a a N 0 0 0 w I-° mcmCmc)00U) @ — C 0) LL Q) LL IU LL C N — fC 0 0) E Iv E E 'a U B -1 C 0 C� °n. U � x � I Q) � cl � c C7 co Q c cu C T) U (n O) � = m O � B � O O V) % 7 y fl N � J a m c E ,N U a) = C p O � f9 O � O c c a `O rn b rn 0 CO O p C p U (p n O U o I Z a Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate Daily Internal Capture Matrix School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 1012 Internal Capture: 304 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 7342 Gross Trips (outbound) 7341 Internal Capture (inbound) 1113 Internal Capture (outbound) 1166 External Trips (inbound) 6229 External Trips (outbound) 6175 External Trips (total) 12404 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 1861 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 931 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 931 B -2 Internal Capture = 4,978 Capture Rate = 14.4% Gross External = 29,620 Net External = 27,759 Residential Shopping Center Office In Out 2,234 2,234 tel In Out 418 417 Total In Out In Out 6,800 6,800 7,342 7,341 Residential In 6,800 808 45 0 853 Out 6,800 661 0 0 661 Shopping Center In 7,342 661 808 220 294 158 138 1,113 1,166 Out 7,3411 Office In Out 2,234 2,2341 0 220 294 0 13 220 352 Hotel In 418 0 138 13 151 Out 417 0 158 0 158 Total In 16,794 Out 16,792 School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 1012 Internal Capture: 304 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 7342 Gross Trips (outbound) 7341 Internal Capture (inbound) 1113 Internal Capture (outbound) 1166 External Trips (inbound) 6229 External Trips (outbound) 6175 External Trips (total) 12404 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 1861 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 931 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 931 B -2 Internal Capture = 4,978 Capture Rate = 14.4% Gross External = 29,620 Net External = 27,759 3 Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate AM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 372 Internal Capture: 112 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 189 Gross Trips (outbound) 121 Internal Capture (inbound) 25 Internal Capture (outbound) 20 External Trips (inbound) 164 External Trips (outbound) 101 External Trips (total) 265 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 66 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 33 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 33 B -3 Internal Capture = 202 Capture Rate = 9.4% Gross External = 1,954 Net External = 1,888 Shopping Residential Center Office Hotel Total In Out In Out In Out In Out 234 815 189 121 304 62 36 23 Residential In 234 8 0 0 8 Out 815 9 0 0 9 Shopping Center In 189 9 8 8 25 Out 121 8 4 8 20 Office In 304 0 4 0 4 Out 621 8 Hotel In 36 0 8 0 8 Out 23 0 8 0 8 Total In 763 Out 1,021 School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 372 Internal Capture: 112 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 189 Gross Trips (outbound) 121 Internal Capture (inbound) 25 Internal Capture (outbound) 20 External Trips (inbound) 164 External Trips (outbound) 101 External Trips (total) 265 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 66 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 33 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 33 B -3 Internal Capture = 202 Capture Rate = 9.4% Gross External = 1,954 Net External = 1,888 Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate PM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 138 Worst Case Scenario Assumtions: 598 Student -to -staff ratio: 1192 Staff Memebers: Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour: 296 Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour: 148 Student Related Trips: 148 In: 68 Out: 61 (70 trips - 9 staff trips) 10.62 (obtained from Hillsborough County School Board) 87 10% 9 (outbound trips) 30% Students from Hacienda Lakes In: 20 (school inbound trips coming from inside Hacienda Lakes) Out: 18 (school outbound trips staying inside Hacienda Lakes) Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 690 Gross Trips (outbound) 719 Internal Capture (inbound) 96 Internal Capture (outbound) 121 External Trips (inbound) 594 External Trips (outbound) 598 External Trips (total) 1192 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 296 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 148 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 148 B -4 Internal Capture = 486 Capture Rate = 14.6% Gross External = 2,842 Net External = 2,546 Appendix C FSUTMS Plot of Future Background Traffic and Project Traffic Distribution C Rau.od. Lakes Pol- Traffic DisMEUtion o l° of o im 001 0.01 001 Doi _ 0.02 on, o D. _ 0 -6 u011 _0.01 _ _ - 0 _ _ -0 f _ 0.0 - 1 Do, y -iv '_0_ - D o to ° ° _0. O.o1 0 lu o 001 Doi 0_01 i 001 p: o p 0 '° g. 0 root 0,01 0.02 0.01 001 0 01 001 °. 0 0 0 001 O ° 000 P I ° �+ ° 8 o o, 0 ° o o p w`; 3001 �0.2 0002 o'. ° _.o e3_ 003 i_ \_ ( 002 r 0 3 0.020.02 002 002 001 o.01 0 0 POol o 0 o °. ° 0 � ° � P a ° IP ° ° ° o ° ° ° I iR ° D_ ° ° - o o ill - ° — o ° I° to o...00 02 ooz o.ozm o _ o o 0 D ° o P o ° p p m _ 001 -002 002_ 003 _ °O a3 Oo30'00., _ jS0 o °O 0o I 0 0 ° 00 .. ' ° ° - -° D 0 °o ° oil 001° 0 -- Two Lane Roatl 0 Fon, Lane Road p _ .,_ ° 0 0 0, ° 0 0.M $ o0q 0 00 0 ne- E t h Lane Read 0 Ten Lane Re 0 ___ -. co. ro�tlC ne ne trot '�� Licensed to Tlndale- Oliver and Associates Inc. Hatian0a Lakes — _. .. a ° — -- ° c� p jo 00, °a� N _. ° o ° Q; ,gyp _ol�i om o° °I o.o) °oor ° o.e oeo °o o e °Qoeo °oos oos. °°as o0 0 ° ooen� o _ a�.°v_ o o 0 0.04 - - 104 m 0 e I 50.. -. of 0p00 e 0 Q 0 0 0 o.)- I 0.. ° 0 0 001 oLp ° Q.0 d' 0 '.0 o °0 pro tY%Y1LL� o 0001 0 01. a 00 o' p U ° 0.04 004 ° OOY Oo0, _. 0.03 003 o05e_ 0.03 °l, 0.03 I 0.01 0 C D 0 - 0 0 { 0 ° o o, ° b o ° m ° 0 p , ,o o ^._.` a °� � p.,z a. o' N o ,o a ooaa ° o 00 ooz o. o o , a m ° a o wl ° oD3 0 $�01]�_D.1) Oe8�02 ° OR I 0 0 0 p02 0.04 _ 2 °� 0.3) 03) OA 01 -_ol OB3 r048 ,— "o__o__ 0 o0 0; oa o o_ - 'p'' o od• °� o D o 0 OD D ° Te hlene RR DDoad .. .0.01 - °j _ .- Roed 0 -- o - Ce000id COnnecror -1 Licensed [D Tindale-011ver and Asso to Inc. C-2 _... El C -3 A" 0 ° °° o/ �i Dq C-4 Licensed to Tindale- Oliver and Associates Inc. Appendix A Methodology Correspondence Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Ml Pl•„ „l Fnnnriarrne January 26, 2009 Mr. Mike Green Collier County Transportation Planning Division 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Hacienda Lakes DRI Transportation Methodology Meeting Dear Mr. Green: The purpose of this letter is to transmit a revised transportation methodology statement to guide the preparation of the traffic impact analysis for the Hacienda Lakes DRI. The revised statement addresses the issues discussed at our meeting on December 21, 2009 to review the draft, proposed methodology. In addition to ourselves, the meeting was attended by Mr. John Podczerwinsky of Collier County, Mr. Lawrence Massey and Mr. Gregory Kern (RS &H) representing the Florida Department of Transportation, and Mr. David Torres representing the applicant. In the meeting, we discussed the need to undertake a special site access analysis for the peak arrival hour for an event at the swamp buggy attraction. We understood that this analysis could be submitted under separate cover, and should address how the site will be connected to Collier Boulevard and address one concurrency segment to the north and south on Collier Boulevard. We appreciate the opportunity to meet with you, and if we have failed to accurately convey the intent of our discussions in this revised document, please let us know as soon as possible. Very Truly Yours, Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. William E Oliver, P.E., PTOE Senior Vice - President 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Se 95 South Central Avenue, Bartow Florida e Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533-8454 4 7 (407) 657 -9106 9 Fax: (863) 533 - 8481 A -1 05 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Planning ;uId Engineering Mr. Mike Greene January 26, 2010 Page 2 of 2 Enclosure: Transportation Methodology Statement Cc: Mr. John Podczerwinsky, Collier County Mr. Lawrence Massey, FDOT D1 Mr. Greg Kern, RS &H Mr. David Torres, Florida Star Development 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -2 E :7 A TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY STATEMENT HACIENDA LAKES DRI Prepared for: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC. Prepared by: Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. January 25, 2009 619001 -00.09 COPR A -3 A 101, Ei* TRANSPORTATION METHODOLOGY STATEMENT HACIENDA LAKES DRI Introduction The Hacienda Lakes DRI is a mixed -use development proposed for a 2,200 + /- acre site on the east side of CR 951 /Collier Boulevard that extends from south of Sabal Palm Road to north of Lord's Way in Collier County, Florida (Figure 1). Of the 2,200 acres, only 760 to 860 acres are considered developable uplands. The development is estimated to build out in approximately 2019, with the major land use components indicated in Table 1. A preliminary site plan of the proposed development is provided in Figure 2. The transportation analysis will examine the development at build -out, for which specific approval is desired; however, the applicant reserves the right to sub -phase the development if desired. The land use quantities indicated in Table 1 are preliminary estimates, and are subject to adjustment as site planning is refined. Table 1 Summary of Land Uses and Peak Hour Trip Generation Estimate Land Use Units Phase One ITE LUC P.M. Peak Hour Trips Single - Family (Detached) DU 691 210 598 Multi- Family DU 1,040 220 590 Hotel Rooms 135 310 80 Commercial/Retail Sq. Ft. GLA 375,000 820 1,542 Office Sq. Ft. GBA 75,000 710 112 In addition to the above land uses, a swamp buggy and/or other "special event" attraction is being considered, but the traffic generated by that operation is expected to occur during non - peak hour periods, so it's effects will not be considered as a part of the DRI analysis. The transportation analysis will be undertaken in one phase to determine the impacts the proposed development will have on roadway and intersection levels of service, to identify improvements necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service and, where applicable, mitigate development impacts of a regional scope. The applicant will submit the analysis as a part of the Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. January 25, 2010 A -4 Hacienda Lakes DRI Transportation Methodology Statement Figure 1 Hacienda Lakes Site Location Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. January 25, 2010 A -5 Hacienda Lakes DRI Transportation Methodology Statement I t NXM,i; 11 F! ustu,'euln„ u,utl 1`RAC7I� r. nntlA„n, ,acn, Al r. � UN II A MJv „ r,3 F\CA,'n7Y1ti i i V � xnunr !: VurAAr l 7 ..i. ._ °___.. INA( I It \AWUS1nI W4f. tt Ikr�,,,oefD nom_ LMEM A - AVWAMON TRACT III C - COMMU AL TRACT — — I �- - lux1K xl),4U =:w - P - PFASMA Harr PJBLX FAQ¢ TRACT (OM ^ 1 • �; Ix41:1 r ix4rr r PR - PASrc IKCACAl101M ,ram i . R - Rcgoon AL TRACT �uaacraruu of l l (Nmnrn,r) IRACI x E �I I cam,uAn I + Cf?TFA MND M i I , nt.AY ,I` fUXI U: IIAA4*/DiX rnAA 7 MCfA1LlI %NfUrr . E CWWA. ?n(Y1 z 1 CLHtER (TIID I I I xA17lE STIAICE Rf1A1A1xK Dtl'. ("�'� _ I TRACT C MAC1 i' wmxoba Cy"" _. a -_ Figure 2 Conceptual Site Plan Source: RWA, Inc. l utdale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 3 Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -6 IxACIx e 1A L-M-1 wmtN,ar n.+uu,n,wu envac,.artre - Ir +t. xF4WAt WAUn bin'Clf nAnY'tA,WS •+ •.•_ •• . ,�• — — ` — n�u IAn�nn T'11A4AY Itv, n�v uAlvnn 'Ast I tivt ARAL NY 1.S7Y�1U1� a sW.. fKVi A 1x4(1 MAC1 i' wmxoba Cy"" _. a -_ Figure 2 Conceptual Site Plan Source: RWA, Inc. l utdale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 3 Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -6 filing of an Application for Development Approval (ADA) of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI), pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. Methodoloey The transportation analysis will be conducted using a version of the Collier County MPO Cost - Feasible Plan FSUTMS model currently being used for transportation planning by the Collier County MPO's consultant. This model has bee updated to reflect recent BEBR mid -range population projections, and will be furnished to the applicant by Collier County staff. Roadway operating conditions will be analyzed for the PM peak 250th highest hour using the detailed analysis procedures described in the 2000 Hi hg_wa_v Capacity Manual (HCM). At site access points, a.m. and p.m. peak hour analyses will be undertaken. Improvements to the existing plus committed road system needed to accommodate the DRI will be identified, and each improvement will be related to an appropriate percentage level of development. The analysis will be conducted in accordance with the assumptions and procedures presented below. During the methodology discussion, it became apparent that an interim submittal to present findings and confirm assumptions would be valuable. Thus, an interim submittal will be provided to address: • internal capture, • background traffic growth rates If adjustments to these procedures and assumptions are determined to be necessary during preparation of the analysis, review agencies will be advised and approval secured. Traffic Generation Rates -- Estimates of the P.M. peak hour traffic volumes to be generated by the Hacienda Lakes DRI will be based on rates contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (8th Edition) reference, using the land use categories identified in Table 1. In response to a County policy requiring all office uses to be evaluated using a "worst case" medical office use assumption, a limitation on the portion of office uses that will be allowed as medical offices will be proposed. Where multiple retail or office sites are proposed, the aggregate size of each site will be identified and the trip generation rate appropriate to the site size will be applied. The Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 4 Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -7 special generator data file (Zdata 3) will be used in the Collier MPO model to supplement the home -based shopping trip attractions to ensure the ITE trip -ends generation estimates are matched. Other appropriate ITE trip generation rates (or equations) may be applied if other land uses are introduced into the site. Study Network Identification -- The transportation study network will include regionally significant roads on which traffic attributable to the development meets Collier County's "2 1/o/2 1/0%" criteria. The extent of the study network will be determined after traffic generation, distribution, and assignment estimates are completed. The service volume estimates of Collier County's AUIR Report will be used to determine preliminary study networks for the analysis. • Inventory of Existing and Proposed Roads -- To identify planned improvements to the road system within the study network, the Capital Programs of the agencies responsible for transportation improvements in the area (e.g. Collier County, CAT, and Florida DOT) will be obtained. The status of planned and scheduled improvements will be excerpted from the Capital Programs of the appropriate agency. Improvements with construction funding scheduled within the first three years of the five year capital program current at the time the Transportation Methodology meeting was held (December 21, 2009) will be considered "committed" improvements for purposes of the analysis. County staff advised that the County's Capital program was undergoing amendments to delay certain improvements, and provided several alternative programs. As we undertake the analysis, we will identify where these changes may affect the results of the analysis. To document existing conditions, the applicant will make use of the most recent agency level of service databases and count data available, up to two years old. Any machine traffic counts collected by the applicant to support the traffic analysis will be less than one -year old, and will be recorded for a 48 -hour period. • Roadway Capacity Analysis — Links on the study road network will be analyzed for 250th highest hour conditions using the more detailed analysis procedures of the 2000 HCM/FDOT 2007 Quality /Level of Service Manual. For intersections, Synchro software will be applied using the "HCS" method, rather than Synchro's percentile delay method. V:C ratios of up to 1 /phf will be considered acceptable for some movements, p rovided Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 5 Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -8 A overall letter -grade levels of service are maintained. The 250th highest hour, assumed to be the evening rush hour, will be analyzed. The average daily traffic, peak -hour volumes, directional traffic load, levels of service and roadway capacities will be reported, as required by the application questionnaire. Input values to the analyses, as well as output values, will be provided in the appendix worksheets. Factors to convert AADT volumes to 250th hour volumes will be based on information provided in Collier County's AUIR report. Roadway improvements will be identified where traffic attributable to the Hacienda Lakes DRI consumes five percent or more of the existing plus committed service capacity and the level of service projected at build -out of the phase being analyzed is estimated to be below the adopted performance standard. Improvements required to provide the appropriate level of service will be identified in the analysis report. "Symmetric" improvements (e.g. improvements to accommodate the a.m. demands as well as p.m. demands) will be identified. Trip Distribution and Assignment -- Trip distribution for the Hacienda Lakes DRI will be based on distributions of population and commercial areas provided by the Collier MPO FSUTMS model, adjusted as described in the section on Traffic Growth Estimates, below. Adjustments to the assignment may be made adjacent to the site to reflect local site access conditions. For example, if multiple driveways to a commercial site are proposed, or some driveways with turning movements restricted, and only one TAZ connection is provided in the model, adjustments to the model assignment may be made to better reflect site specific access conditions. • Internal Capture /Adjacent Street Capture -- Estimates of internal capture and adjacent street capture will be based on the application of the procedures identified in the ITE Trip Generation reference and on execution of the transportation model and the consultant's judgment. The ITE procedure has been viewed as not always reasonable, so those worksheets will be provided, and if deviation is judged to be reasonable, an alternate internal capture assumption will be presented in the interim submittal. A matrix of estimated p.m. peak hour trip interchanges between on -site land uses will be provided. The proportion of background traffic captured from the adjacent street system will be Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 6 Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -9 E checked for reasonableness and will be reported in the ADA. Supporting worksheets will be provided in the appendices of the analysis. Internal capture estimates will be reviewed against a 25 percent maximum rate, and pass -by capture will be limited to not exceed ten percent of the background traffic on adjacent streets • Traffic Growth Estimates -- Traffic growth will be estimated using information from the above - referenced Collier MPO FSUTMS model traffic assignments (2020 horizon year) and historical traffic count data collected by the Florida DOT and Collier County. To estimate future year total traffic volumes, a traffic assignment will be made using Hacienda Lakes DRI development plus the 2020 countywide socio- economic data discussed above. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic will be tracked throughout the FSUTMS model road network using a "selected zone" traffic assignment procedure, and will be subtracted from the total model traffic volumes to identify the "raw" background traffic volumes. Smoothing procedures will be applied to the raw background traffic volumes to estimate future year background volumes. Smoothing considers the accuracy of the model validation and results in adjustments to the future year volume estimates to refine future year traffic volume estimates. The 2020 model traffic volumes will be compared to the 2000 validation year model volumes to identify the traffic volume growth over a 20 -year period, and a pro -rata portion of the total background growth (e.g. 10 years / 20 years = 50 %) will be added to 2009 AADT count volumes to estimate 2019 background volumes. The DRI trips will then be added to the "smoothed" 2019 background volumes to estimate future year total volumes. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic on each link of the transportation study network will then be identified as the net external traffic from the site (e.g. after internal capture and adjacent street capture are considered). Traffic growth estimates will be reviewed to avoid negative growth, unless justified by the improvement of an alleviating parallel or new road. A requirement of Collier County's transportation concurrency procedures is that minimum traffic growth rates of no less than two percent per year on any road segment be used. This requirement seems to be contrary to the provisions of 163.3180(12)(b) and ® 16(b), F.S. This issue was specifically discussed, and prior to completing the transportation analysis, the growth rates from the new model application will be reviewed Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. 7 Hacienda Lakes DRI January 25, 2010 Transportation Methodology Statement A -10 Florida Department of Transportation CHARLIE CRIST 2295 Victoria Avenue, Suite 292 STEPHANIE C. KOPELOUSOS GOVERNOR Fort Myers, FL 33901 SECRETARY February 2, 2010 Mr. Dan Trescott DRI Coordinator Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 1926 Victoria Avenue Fort Myers, FL 33901 RE: Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Methodology Statement — FDOT Recommendations and Comments Dear Mr. Trescott: ® The Florida Department of Transportation, District 1, has reviewed the methodology statement dated January 26, 2010 for the Hacienda Lakes DRI in Collier County. The Department offers the following recommendations and comments. 1. Page 4, Paragraph 1— The 100"' highest hour is required to assess the PM peak period for planning purposes. Please update all 250th hour references to the 100 'h hour. 2. Page 4, Trip Generation Rates — The trip generation estimate should reflect the conceptual site plan provided in Figure 2 of the document. The commercial uses (Tract C) may be aggregated as they are all located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattle Snake Hammock Road. The three residential tracts (Tract R) should have separate trip generation calculations for each area. The residential/medical use area (Tract RIMU) should have a calculation for the residential portion and a calculation for the medical portion. 3. Page 5, Inventory of Roads — Traffic count data must be less than one year old. If existing counts which are greater than one year old are to be used, they should be increased by an annual growth rate to estimate current traffic volumes. That growth rate should be developed as part of the applicant's interim traffic memo as described on page 4 of the document. 4. Page 6 -7, Internal Capture /Adjacent Street Capture — While a 25% internal capture rate ceiling is proposed, the Department requires the use of the ITE Handbook's internal capture matrix calculations to support the projected capture rate and volume. The Department does not support the use of the travel demand model alone to determine internal capture is not acceptable for this development application. 5. Page 7, Traffic Growth Estimates — Background traffic volume projections should be derived through a spreadsheet analysis that tracks, by roadway segment, the existing traffic volume, reserved/encumbered trips, the annual growth rate (determined from the travel demand model and from historical trends), and projected future traffic volume (without the development). The model may be used to assist in the determination of the annual growth rate as well as provide project trip distribution and assignment percentages to the highway network. The Department does not support the method described in the document, because it may tend to over - estimate future background traffic in the vicinity of the proposed development. r_d11i Mr. Dan Trescott Hacienda Lakes DRI Methodology Statement — FDOT Recommendations and Comments February 2, 2010 Page 2 of 2 6. Page 7, last paragraph — FDOT, District 1 requires the use of a minimum 2% annual growth rate for State roadway segment traffic volumes. The Department is available to discuss these comments at your convenience. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (239) 461 -4300 or lawrence.massey@dot.state.fl.us. LLM/llm/rsh. E N Sincerely, Lawrence Massey District 1 Growth Management Coordinator www.dot.state.fl.us M% Page I of I Fabricio A. Ponce From: GreeneMichael [MichaelGreene @colliergov.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:25 AM To: Bill Oliver; Massey, Lawrence; Kern, Greg; PodczerwinskyJohn Cc: David E. Torres; Dwight Nadeau; Fabricio A. Ponce Subject: RE: Hacienda Lakes DRI -- Transportation Methodology Bill: I have reviewed your letter of methodology and have the following comments: • You will need to clearly document the split between "Office" and "Medical Office" in the report. • Roadway improvements should be identified by either 5% impact and /or where the DRI causes the road to drop below the adopted LOS. Language reads such that both criteria are to be met before improvements are identified. • Distribution assignments and modifications to such based on local conditions and site access issues should also be approved by staff prior to use. Everything else seems to be an accurate reflection of our methodology meeting. Mike From: Bill Oliver [mailto:BOliver @tindaleoliver.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 5:51 PM To: GreeneMichael; Massey, Lawrence; Kern, Greg; Podczerwinsky)ohn Cc: David E. Torres; Dwight Nadeau; Fabricio A. Ponce t Subject: Hacienda Lakes DRI -- Transportation Methodology Mike and others, I've attached our revised transportation methodology statement for your review. Please advise me if anything has been incorrectly stated. We have received the model files, and are jumping into the analysis, and hope to transmit the interim submittal within approximately two weeks. William E. Oliver, P.E., PTOE Sr. Vice - President Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 N. Ashley Dr., Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33602 P: 813.224.8862 F: 813.226.2106 woliverCcDtindaleoliver.com www.tindaleoliver.com The information contained in this e-mail and all attachments are confidential and intended only for the use of the recipient. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized person. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communications is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please relay to the sender that you have received this communication in error; then delete the e-mail and any attachments. Thank you. Under Florida Law, e -mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 2/2/2010 A- 13 C relative to the concurrency procedures requirement and if this issue remains a concern, we will resolve them at that time. Based on the use of the very recent growth projections, no other developments were identified to be specifically considered as a part of the background traffic forecasts. Report -- A report documenting the analysis in the format of the questions asked in Question 21, Transportation Considerations, will be submitted. J:\— Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs\Methodology \Hacienda Lakes DRI Methodology 01- 25- 10.doc Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. January 25, 2010 A -14 Hacienda Lakes DR[ Transportation Methodology Statement Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Pl�mning anal Engineering March 1, 2010 Daniel L. Trescott Project Service Manager Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 1926 Victoria Ave. Fort Myers, FL 33901 Subject: DRI #07- 0506 -175 Hacienda Lakes Transportation Interim Submittal Dear Mr. Trescott, This letter provides responses to comments of the Florida DOT dated February 2, 2010, and Collier County also dated February 2, 2010, regarding our January 20, 2010 transportation methodology statement. In addition, in accordance with that methodology statement, we are transmitting the "interim submittal" discussed therein, as Exhibit A to this letter, in the format of Question 21. Each of the FDOT's comments, then Collier County's comments, are typed in bold -faced font, with our responses following. We believe the statement as submitted, substantiated by the comments below and the interim submittal, comprises a complete and appropriate methodology. Florida DOT Comments: 1. Page 4, Paragraph 1— The 100th highest hour is required to assess the PM peak period for planning purposes. Please update all 250th hour references to the 100th hour. During the transportation methodology meeting, Collier County staff requested the use of the 250th highest hour, as used in their Annual Update and Inventory Report, as it is consistent with their concurrency management system. Since the local government sets and interprets the level of service standard on non -SIS roads, we will use their requested 250th highest hour factor on non -SIS roads. Since the FDOT sets and interprets the level of service standard on the SIS system, we will use their requested 100th highest hour factor on SIS roads. A copy of correspondence from Collier County staff indicating no objection on this issue is enclosed in Exhibit B. 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Bldg 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657 -9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -15 Tindale- Ofiver & Associates, Inc. Planning and Engineering Mr. Dan Trescott February 18, 2010 Page 2 of 5 2. Page 4, Trip Generation Rates — The trip generation estimate should reflect the conceptual site plan provided in Figure 2 of the document. The commercial uses (Tract C) may be aggregated as they are all located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattle Snake Hammock Road. The three residential tracts (Tract R) should have separate trip generation calculations for each area. The residential /medical use area (Tract R /MU) should have a calculation for the residential portion and a calculation for the medical portion. The comment is noted. The traffic generation estimate, included in the interim submittal document, is in compliance with the comment, but goes a bit beyond. We generated each non - residential land use separately, and created seven residential areas, rather than four (including the R /MU) as suggested in the comment. 3. Page 5, Inventory of Roads — Traffic count data must be less than one year old. If existing counts which are greater than one year old are to be used, they should be increased by an annual growth rate to estimate current traffic volumes. That growth rate should be developed as part of the applicant's interim traffic memo as described on page 4 of the document. AADT data from Collier County's 2009 Traffic Counts report were used, as well as counts from FDOT's FTI DVD for 1 -75. The 2008 counts on the FTI DVD were factored upwards based on historical trend. Intersection turning movement counts will be collected in 2010. The background traffic growth estimates are based on Collier County MPO's FSUTMS model and 2019 socio- economic data, which have produced an overall traffic growth rate of 4.4 percent per year on the study network. Growth rates on individual road segments vary from 1.0 percent to 14.2 percent, depending on the "denominator" traffic volume and where growth is expected to occur in southern Collier County. The lowest growth rate percentages were observed on US 41 near Naples, and the highest growth rates were on US 41 east of Manatee Rd. A table summarizing the traffic growth estimates on a segment -by- segment basis is provided in the "interim submittal" document. 4. Page 6 -7, Internal Capture /Adjacent Street Capture — While a 25% internal capture rate ceiling is proposed, the Department requires the use of the ITE Handbook's internal capture matrix calculations to support the projected capture rate and volume. The Department does not support the use of the travel demand model alone to determine internal capture is not acceptable for this development application. v 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 * Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -16 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Planning and 1:ngineering Mr. Dan Trescott February 18, 2010 Page 3 of 5 An overall internal capture estimate of 15 percent has been estimated using the ITE procedures, and we have used that rate. 5. Page 7, Traffic Growth Estimates — Background traffic volume projections should be derived through a spreadsheet analysis that tracks, by roadway segment, the existing traffic volume, reserved /encumbered trips, the annual growth rate (determined from the travel demand model and from historical trends), and projected future traffic volume (without the development). The model may be used to assist in the determination of the annual growth rate as well as provide project trip distribution and assignment percentages to the highway network. The Department does not support the method described in the document, because it may tend to over- estimate future background traffic in the vicinity of the proposed development. The comment is noted. The background traffic growth estimates we have developed are provided in the interim submittal for agency review and comment. During the methodology meeting, the applicant's consultant specifically asked the question regarding which other "approved but not yet built" developments should be specifically considered, and the agency response was that the 2019 socio- economic data developed to reflect BEBR mid -range population projections and the 1 -75 /CR 951 Interchange Modification /PD &E study in progress included all such developments, and no developments were identified for specific consideration. Again, a copy of correspondence from Collier County staff indicating no objection to this issue is enclosed in Exhibit B. 6. Page 7, last paragraph — FDOT, District 1 requires the use of a minimum 2% annual growth rate for State roadway segment traffic volumes. The use of the minimum two percent per year growth rate was specifically discussed during the methodology meeting, and the applicant pointed out that amendments to 163.3180(12)4.(b), F.S. indicated that growth rates should be constrained to the rates resulting from application of the BEBR mid -range population estimates. On two road segments, on US 41 near Airport Road and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, the BEBR forecasts indicate less than a two percent per year growth rate, and this reduced growth rate is supported by historical trend analysis. Supporting worksheets are provided in Appendix B of this response to comments. On the basis of the above, the use of less than a two percent annual growth rate is appropriate. Collier County comments: 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -17 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Planning and Engineering Mr. Dan Trescott February 18, 2010 Page 4 of 5 You will need to clearly document the split between "Office" and "Medical Office" in the report. This will be done, as can be seen in the interim submittal. 2. Roadway improvements should be identified by either 5% impact and /or where the DRI causes the road to drop below the adopted LOS. Language reads such that both criteria are to be met before improvements are identified. The transportation analysis is being undertaken to address both DRI requirements and Collier County's concurrency requirements. Thus, for DRI and development order purposes, a five percent threshold may be used, but to address Collier County concurrency requirements, the County's 2 %/2 %/3% significance thresholds will be used. The comment seems to suggest that significance will be determined at any location where Hacienda Lakes traffic causes traffic to "cross the line" from acceptable to unacceptable, even if that location is beyond the geographic extent of the study network. Application of the two criteria separately, as seems to be proposed by the comment, would require study of many more road segments beyond the "2 %/2 %/3 %" study network, and the further study of only a few limited segments within the study network. However, the geographic extent of the study network is established by the "2 %/2 %/3 %" rule, and within that network, we propose to study all segments that are estimated to fail with total traffic (whether the failure is "caused" by Hacienda Lakes traffic or not). 3. Distribution assignments and modifications to such based on local conditions and site access issues should also be approved by staff prior to use. The proposed distribution and assignment are presented in the attached "Interim Submittal" for review. 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -18 Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. Planning and Liigineering Mr. Dan Trescott February 18, 2010 Page 5 of 5 In summary, we believe the methodology statement as written, as well as the interim submittal that accompanies this letter, accurately represents the appropriate procedures under DRI rules. Should you have any questions regarding the above or enclosed material, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. William E. Oliver, P.E., PTOE Senior Vice President ✓ Enclosures: Hacienda Lakes Transportation Analysis Interim Submittal Correspondence from Collier County Cc: Mr. Lawrence Massey, Florida DOT District 1 Mr. Greg Kern, RS &H, Inc. Mr. Michael Greene, Collier County Mr. Greg Podczerwinsky, Collier County Mr. David Torres, Florida Star Development, Inc. Mr. Dwight Nadeau, RWA, Inc. Mr. Ron Weaver, Stearns, Weaver, Miller, Inc. 1000 North Ashley Drive, Suite 100, Tampa, Florida 33602 • Phone: (813) 224 -8862 • Fax: (813) 226 -2106 1595 South Semoran Boulevard, Building 7, Suite 1540, Winter Park, Florida 32792 • Phone: (407) 657 -9210 • Fax: (407) 657- 9106 195 South Central Avenue, Bartow, Florida 33830 • Phone: (863) 533 -8454 • Fax: (863) 533 -8481 A -19 Exhibit A Transportation Interim Submittal A -20 EXHIBIT A Question 21— Transportation B. Provide a projection of vehicle trips expected to be generated by this development. State all standards and assumptions used, including trip end generation rates by land use types, sources of data, modal split, persons per vehicle, etc., as appropriate. The acceptable methodology to be used for projecting trip generation (including the Florida Standard Urban Model Structure or the Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation rates) shall be determined at the pre- application conference stage. The traffic generation estimate for the Hacienda Lakes DRI is summarized in Table 21 -3. The trip generation estimate was based on fitted -curve equations or average trip generation rates obtained from Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th edition, 2008), as indicated in Table 21 -3. Whenever available, the fitted -curve equations were used. If a fitted - curve equation was not available for a particular land use or time period, then the average rates were used. C. Estimate the internal/external split for the generated trips at the end of each phase of development as identified in (B) above. Use the format below and include a discussion of what aspects of the development (i.e. provision of on -site shopping and recreation facilities, on -site employment opportunities, etc.) will account for this internal/external split. Provide supporting documentation showing how splits were estimated, such as the results of the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) model application. Describe the extent to which the proposed design and land use mix will foster a more cohesive, internally supported project. As shown in Table 21 -3, the Hacienda Lakes DRI will consist of a mix of land uses that provide opportunities for trips generated by one land use component to be satisfied by another. Therefore, some trips will occur within the site and need not travel on public roads adjacent to the site. Internal capture between residential, commercial, and office land uses were estimated using procedures and rates identified in the Trip Generation Handbook (ITE, June 2004). A summary of the estimated trip interchanges between on -site land uses is provided in Appendix 21 -A. Overall, the internal capture estimates resulted in PM peak hour external trips being reduced to approximately 85 percent of the total vehicle trip end generation reported in Table 21 -3. Table 21 -4 summarizes the internal capture estimates. Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J: \Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal\lnterim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -1 A -21 d M E N W 1r O L 4) 1✓ d 0 Q. 0 N d M J M M N r C d d H = EXHIBIT A f0 N O M O N (O O N N O O 00 00 O 00 N CO lr O N N M Q. O N N LV t0 'C ~ 1- M N N H L M O (O w M CO M It w w (D N =3 O N L-- U) M 00 O O 00 N N CO N N O R d IL LO r- 0 O O O (O O In (O N N O N 00 2 C — LO M O LO (O L- U-) v't CO N Lf) r 00 N a � , LO O LO 00 W t` r- (D W M O O M "t N LO O It 0) LC) N A M Q 0 C14 N CO (OD L ~ L 3 +r CO O V M O M O t` M N =7 p LO -�t O LO M O (O M N N M '. �, 0 Y L6 CL N LO O V LO "t 0 M N (O lzt O CO I.- N V O � Cl) QC CO CO LO N V O - T O.LO M M O OD N LO co LO 0 O-�t M N M M N M (O M M ti d' 00 O M CO M .0 00 N LO M M CO W O M O 00 r I- M CA o F- N N N N CO N M N N N a CL c 1_ OO H f0 LO a a a a a a a L C ` (0 O O N LO O O O O L (� M v Lo LO M v rn o U) M N � O Ir,-. N � W W U') 00 c y 3 M ~ U> Z to w O O F- ~ U U U U U U U U L) m p) > +� > LL LL uL LL LL LL LL LL Q LL Q O_ W M N N N N N O N N N N N N N 00 r-- M O N C O_ 0) O a 00 N W c c c c a) OD H O O O = a O m c a a) d c 0 t D 0 � c N O o O M � V g a a) a) m a a y () 15 a) a) O N m O .. m W ~_ a C M C (M6 C 0 C 0 uL d LL O LL C N 4) J a m a � V m a m H °-a Q u) m M O c� a) a C a C a C o M O — Y Q Cn Q n Q cn cn C7 2 CO Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\-Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal\Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -2 A -22 EXHIBIT A Table 21 -4a Hacienda Lakes DRI - Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) Gross Trips (outbound) Internal Capture (inbound) Internal Capture (outbound) External Trips (inbound) External Trips (outbound) External Trips (total) Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips Pass -By Trips (inbound) Pass -By Trips (outbound) 8018 8017 1150 1204 6868 6813 13681 2052 1026 1026 Net External = 25,938 Tindale - Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -3 A -23 Daily Internal Capture Matrix Shopping Residential Center Office Hotel Total In Out In Out In Out In Out 6,726 6,726 8,018 8,017 1,226 1,227 418 417 In 6,726 882 25 0 907 Residential Out 6,726 722 0 0 722 Shopping In 8,018 722 270 158 1,150 Center Out 8,017 882 184 138 1,204 In 1,226 0 184 0 184 Office Out 1,227 25 270 0 138 13 13 308 151 In 418 Hotel Out 417 0 158 0 158 Total In 16,388 Out 16,387 Internal Capture = 4784 Capture Rate = 14.6% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 27,990 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) Gross Trips (outbound) Internal Capture (inbound) Internal Capture (outbound) External Trips (inbound) External Trips (outbound) External Trips (total) Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips Pass -By Trips (inbound) Pass -By Trips (outbound) 8018 8017 1150 1204 6868 6813 13681 2052 1026 1026 Net External = 25,938 Tindale - Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -3 A -23 EXHIBIT A Table 21 -4b Hacienda Lakes DRI - Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate AM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix Shopping Residential Center Office Hotel Total In Out In Out In Out In Out 231 805 205 131 *60 33 36 23 Residential In 231 0 0 9 Out 805 10 0 10 Shopping 10 7 8 25 Center 9 4 9 22 Office 0 4 0 4 An2 0 7 0 7 Hotel 0 9 0 9 0 8 0 8 Total In 617 Out 992 Internal Capture = 94 Capture Rate = 5.8% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 1,515 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) Gross Trips (outbound) Internal Capture (inbound) Internal Capture (outbound) External Trips (inbound) External Trips (outbound) External Trips (total) Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips Pass -By Trips (inbound) Pass -By Trips (outbound) 205 131 25 22 180 109 289 72 36 36 Net External = 1,443 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRi \dots \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -4 A -24 a EXHIBIT A Table 21 -4c Hacienda Lakes DRI - Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate PM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix Residential Center Gross In Out In Out Trips 1 833 465 756 786 Residential Out 465 Shopping Center In Out 756 786 Office In 51 Out 147 Hotel In 42 Out 38 Total In 1,682 Out 1.436 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) Gross Trips (outbound) Internal Capture (inbound) Internal Capture (outbound) External Trips (inbound) External Trips (outbound) External Trips (total) Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips Pass -By Trips (inbound) Pass -By Trips (outbound) I 15 756 786 103 123 653 663 1316 Office Hotel Total In Out In Out 51 147 1 42 38 0 0 66 15 20 103 6 13 123 0 16 1 19 1 14 0 20 Internal Capture = 460 Capture Rate = 14.8% Gross External = 2,658 328 164 164 Net External = 2,330 Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DR] J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -5 A -25 0 EXHIBIT A D. Provide a projection of total peak hour directional traffic, with the DRI, on the highway network within the study area at the end of each phase of development. If these projections are based on a validated FSUTMS model, state the source, date, and network of the model and of the TAZ projections. If no standard model is available or some other model or procedure is used, describe it in detail and include documentation showing its validity. Describe the procedure used to estimate and distribute traffic with full DRI development in subzones at build out and at interim phase -end years. These assignments may reflect the effects of any new road or improvements which are programmed in adopted capital improvements programs and /or comprehensive plans to be constructed during the DRI construction; however, the inclusion of such roads should be clearly identified. Show these link projections on maps or tables of the study area network, one map or table for each phase -end year. Describe how these conclusions were reached. Year 2019 PM peak hour traffic volumes on the 2012 existing plus committed roadway network were estimated using the FSUTMS Model for the Collier County MPO provided to the applicant's consultant on January 21, 2010. Socio- economic data projections corresponding to the mid -range population projections of the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research for 2019 were provided with the model set. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic volumes and background traffic volumes were identified using the "select zone" assignment procedures of the FSUTMS model. 2019 daily background AADT volumes were forecasted by: (a) subtracting the Hacienda Lakes select -zone traffic volumes from the total traffic volumes, (b) interpolating between 2000 validation model volumes and the 2019 volumes to estimate 2009 model peak season volumes, (c) determining the annual traffic growth rate from 2009 to 2019 based on the model volumes above for a "Method A" estimate, (d) determining the difference in 2019 and 2009 model -based volumes (taking into consideration the MOCF of 0.85) to be used for a "Method B" estimate, (e) applying the growth rate and the volume difference to the actual 2009 AADT counts to create two ( "Method A" and "Method B ") estimates of 2019 AADT, (f) examining the differences between the Method A and Method B estimates and usually averaging the two to develop a 2019 background AADT estimate. Averaging was chosen in most cases because the two methods produced very similar volumes. For I -75, a two percent per year annual growth rate was applied per FDOT direction, as the model -based methods resulted in a lower growth rate. On U.S. 41 east of C.R. 951, the higher, difference method (Method B) was applied because Method A seemed to produce low estimates of growth. The segment- specific volumes were then reviewed on an area -wide basis by computing the vehicle - miles of travel on the study network. The model -based travel growth estimates indicate that an Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI\docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -6 A -26 0 EXHIBIT A annual VMT growth rate of 37,513 vmt per year can be expected, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI has used an annual VMT growth rate of 40,339 vmt per year. The model -based growth rate also indicates that the 2019 study network vmt will be 1.494 times the 2009 study network vmt, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI has estimated the 2019 study network vmt will be 1.492 times the 2009 vmt. Thus, the background traffic growth rates used in this analysis are consistent with those of the BEBR mid -range forecasts, as incorporated into Collier County's travel demand model. This information is presented and summarized in Table 21 -5. The resulting overall background traffic annual growth rate on the study network between 2009 and 2019 is 4.1 percent per year. The resulting background AADT volumes were converted to PM peak -hour, peak season background traffic volumes using the appropriate "K250 "(for non -SIS roads) or "K100" (for SIS roads) and "D" factors, as identified in Table (21 -5). The peak direction of background traffic on each segment was based on existing traffic flow patterns. Hacienda Lakes DRI trips on each road segment were identified using the "selected zone" assignment procedure which tracks the trips generated by the group of TAZ's in which the Hacienda Lakes DRI was isolated. The resulting distribution of external Hacienda Lakes DRI trips from the model was applied to the ITE -based trip generation estimate to estimate the PM peak hour Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic. PM peak hour background traffic volumes were added to PM peak hour DRI traffic volumes to estimate total traffic volumes for the 2019 PM peak hour. Background traffic volumes and Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic assignments for 2019 are indicated in Table 21 -6. E. Assign the trips generated by this development as shown in (B) and (C) above and show, on separate maps or tables for each phase -end year, the DRI traffic on each link of the then - existing network within the study area. Include peak -hour directional trips. If local data is available, compare average trip lengths by purpose for the project and local jurisdiction. For the year of build out, and at the end of each phase, estimate the percent impact, in terms of peak hour directional DRI trips /total peak hour directional trips and in terms of peak hour directional DRI trips /existing peak hour service volume for desired LOS, on each regionally significant roadway in the study area. Identify facility type, number of lanes and projected signal locations for the regionally significant roads. DRI project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study network by Collier County's Transportation Systems Planning Model, as described above. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic assignment is indicated in Table 21 -7. During the traffic assignment step, capture of trips from Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) adjacent to the commercial component of the site was considered. For the PM peak hour, the resulting pass -by capture estimate using ITE procedure was 328 trip -ends, or 164 trips, which would be Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI\docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -7 A -27 E A Table 21 -5 2019 Background Tratfic Growth s"-- Raw MOdal volume 2we Raw Model Vr-, Inter- potetaA Mmral Grovnh R.to Adj-n Anmut Gmwb Reta "' 2009301 AADT G.--, 2W9 MDT heal cuun0 2018 MDT Rwubing Average Annual G.- Comm- nnN - 5apmanl Length Imii r Motlet -6asad VMT (applied MOCF nt 0.851 MDTrE -MY VMT ;:- On from To 2000 2019 McOwd .,. MMbod WeO err Rate 0300 _ 2018 1009 BK Radio Rtl. GR.951 8.780 39.165 .�L7 7.0% 10% 13,862 4!1340 34.487 34,202 34,342 69% 0,71 5299 23 14441 24 Tier ICR951 Pine Rid eRd Greco Bw 20.213 Z. 29.883 36% 3.6% 9,133 26,649 36,231 %,782 36.007 3.5% 1.93 33,159 66. 51433 69,494 dlie, C.R.951) Green S!W Gdden Cate Pk", 20.781 36.335 28.149 2.9% 2.9% 69% 26.649 346399 33607 34,003 2.8% 1.93 34,091 59608 51.433 65.6 liar (C.R.951) Gdden Gate Pk 1 -75 N' 10.511 39.005 24,008 6.2% 62% I 747 21.868 35,528 34,615 35,072 6.0% 166 14831 Y036 36,301 '.6. -75 5 Devi. Blvd. 32438 73,986 52,119 4.2% 42% 18,587 41.655 59132 60,242 59,687 43% 038 10477 23897 15819 M.Ml . (CR.951) D"BNd. Lad's vlh 25.821 42,973 33,918 23% 2]% 7,673 2Q446 33.479 34,119 33,799 28% 2.20 48,265 80,36D 58,181 74,3 .IGR951 Lad's Rldsesmke Harr kRd, 25,821 42,973 33,918 2.7% 2.7% 7,673 26,446 336479 34,119 33,798 28% 0.92 2D, 192 33. .24,330 31 Itt BPM. (C R951 Raldeabke Hmmo Rd L CkA" 26,368 48.032 36830 3.1% 3.1% 9,692 18,776 24620 28.468 26,510 4.1% 0.38 8.517 15514 7,135 10, dher Blvd.iGR951' Lay CUW,.l US 41 22811 42.M6 32149 3.2% 3.2% 8820 19,114 25,137 27821 481 3.9% 303 58,760 109,5 57.582 W 5.R 951 us" Tower Rd. 32.527 54,174 4Z7$1 27% 27% 9681 28,617 36238 38301 37270 3.0% D74 3467 21177 27 R 951 Towe:-Rd. Marrebe Rd. 32,339 85,212 47.910 3.6% 3fi% 14.707 28617 38,852 43.324 41.138 44% 0.34 18. 84730 13. R 951 Manatee Rd Manse) 0r. 29,188 55,321 41,667 3.3% 3.3% 1t6B1 22878 11448 31.569 5D9 42% 345 782. 78929 1121 Redl. Rd. L.rgd -Rd. Same Barbera BIW. 13764 39,743 26070 52% 52% 11622 19178 29,236 303WD 30,018 5.7% 201 67901 38618 W aft Rd. Santa Berbaa BMW. S.R 84 (DI, BI- 2,411 21,445 11.427 8.8% 86% 8515 9.217 1728 17,732 17,515 9D% 134 24,426 12,351 23,4 Ra4eaWre Hma Rd. U.6.41 Chade�ra nn Blvd. 18195 29$5 23.282 2.4% 24% 4.805 22.835 28,379 17.640 28.010 23% 080 N-2 19876 18268 22. Hm4k Rd. Chsdema &W. Cwm Berm Rd 12,277 098 18.?50 3.7%. 3]% 5.Rb 13.261 18.138 18997 18.568 40% C40 8533 5.301 7m.-W Hord Rd. Cw Bm Rd. SenW Bnr6ae Blvd 7,517 25,456 16. WO 59 °,r. 54% 8012 12487 19,830 20.499 20,166 61% 075 16228 9,365 15.1aflJ l eHm Rd. Sane Barbara BIW. CR951 2888 22843 12341 85% 85% 857 8529 15787 17.456 16.622 95% 111 36891 16205 31. w Redid Rd. S. R 84(Dav�s Blvc l 19,872 48970 33.855 4f ",6 46% 13.018 32997 48.013 46,015 47.014 42% 105 43,706 34,647 49, Hammock Rd. M 43757 - W. ni. 171. nle Ne 37193 37,193 - Nole 6. 205 76,247 76,2 -T5 Gdden Gate Pk C41ia Bivtl. 11.784 67611 64018 CE °,T 20% 3045 32`..00 39011 35.545 3900D 20% Pbk T. 3.30 17052- 111.678 107.250 128 ml Trail Eeel Cavil BNd. Ai a' RC. 4p,881 976 47.081 1 `% 1 5% lam 3D, 114 35.'87 36.55'. 35,670 1 7% 1 26 42. r84 57 BOB 38.6]4 451 ami Trail Ee.t Pi at Rd. Retdemake Hanmon Rd. 62,867 69,060 58,164 1.0% 1.0% 5.003 44.146 48613 49.149 96,881 1.1% 169 7.`,.943 82,008 71,117 ffi, mi Trail EeM CUIItt BIW. Mamtee Rd. 12.104 3$189 22092 6WA 5M,. 9.1432 11.978 17.995 21,410 79703 64% 167 17,1ffi 47,112 21.113 32,914 iaml Trees F.Y Mamba Rd t'- ,raamva Rrl 10.549 31 429 20440 s 4% 5 4% x,341 - 6.712 13,7W 13,M 21A% Nob 8. 1 77 15.AT3 46.419 1508 25,57 mi Tr H Eeal Grcemv Rd Six LS Farm Rd. 8.094 29,703 18.330 62% 6.2% 9.667 4385 7,073 14,112 14,032 2211% Nob 8. 246 16,925 82.109 10,738 34.51 Poles: TDIa19: 7587 1,4]1,584 .19,911 1,2]3,362 Annwl Ir-aw m VMT: 37,513 �� 40,339 (1)1 Perwd Ave29e Anna) Gmwh ReM Manrwm -Used for MaBxn A 2019 AADT Es male Rath of VMT (20DB W 2019): 1.494 7.492 (212009 RMV = (2019 RMV- 2110 RAN) x MOCF - COIIW Canty MOCF = DW - Jsed is Method B 2019 AADT F tirrwte ( 3 )MenodAMIPAADT =2t109AADTx(1 + ":n CrovMRdex(2019- 2009))1 Ee7Model Annwl Increase Conparaon' 108 ' (4) Meswd B 2019 AADT = 209 AADT +121132019) AADT GrowOr EsUModel Rebo Compar¢on: 100 (5l )load 2019 AADT = (Mellad A 2019 AADT s MMW 2 2019 MDT) 12 (6) U"d 2%M 21119 RMV x MOCF (7)Usad2%e,Me roes. Model forecasts 37,600 Vmt increase per year, we're using 40,399. - Conservative! Ibl l/sed Ndxr Mem9a B Model forecasts 2019 vmt will be 1.494 times 2009 vmt (2009 volumes are based on interpolated 2009 between 2000 and 2019). We're matching that ratio! Overall growth in travel on the study network is 4.10/6 per year. Tmd.k -Oliva and A.- ietes, Inc. Hacirnd. Lakes DRI J:1 Iwm611- 6W61 -M- 110. 119 -Ha6m& Lakes DR]NI-Imerim Sabminal Wn nor Submine120100225.doc 21 -6 A -2 EXHIBIT A approximately 6.5 percent of the future background traffic on Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), adhering to the "less than 10 percent" limit agreed to during methodology discussions. The number of net new external PM peak hour vehicle trips attributable to the Hacienda Lakes DRI assigned to the road network was 2,330 trips (1,288 inbound, 1,042 outbound). F. Based on the assignment of trips as shown in (D) and (E) above, what modifications in the highway network (including intersections) will be necessary at the end of each phase of development, to attain and maintain local and regional level of service standards? For those improvements which will be needed earlier as a result of the DRI, indicate how much earlier. Where applicable, identify Transportation System Management (TSM) alternatives (e.g. signalization, one -way pairs, ride - sharing, etc.) that will be used and any other measures necessary to mitigate other impacts such as increased maintenance due to a large number of truck movements. The total traffic volumes estimated as described above were compared against the roadway service volume estimates of Collier County's Annual Update and Inventory Report to establish a screening of locations where below standard operating conditions are expected, and where development traffic would meet or exceed the thresholds of significance. To address Collier County's concurrency regulations, a "2 %/2 % /3 %" threshold of significance was used, where the 2 percent threshold was applied on the first and second roadway segments as one departs from the site, and three percent thereafter. These thresholds of significance are more stringent than those required by DRI statues, an issue which may affect subsequent Development Order discussions. The significantly impacted are can be observed in Figure 21 -1. Table 21 -7 provides a summary of these locations. In accordance with discussions during the transportation methodology meeting, it is not expected that every signalized intersection on the study network be evaluated, as this would entail data collection and analysis of a substantial cost. 36 signalized intersections are included in the study network. However, only four signalized intersections are located on segments estimated to be both significantly and adversely impacted, and they are proposed to be analyzed during the p.m. peak hour. Three additional intersections at site driveways would also be analyzed, these during the a.m. peak hour as well as the p.m. peak hour. These intersections are: • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at I -75 (North) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at 1 -75 (South) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at Davis Boulevard • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at Rattlesnake Hammock Road • S.R. 951 at Manatee Road • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at Northern Site Access • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at The Lord's Way Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\—Client 600 - 699 \619001- 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal\Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -10 A -30 EXHIBIT A Figure 21 -1. Significantly Impacted Study Area G1 c. I r. 45 O 107,_, 5fg Cypress Swamp UD n Rye Pine Ridge Rd Pine Ridge Rd Pine Ridge Rd 951 White Blv 696 11 th Ave N < 107 12th Ave SW > m N 14th Ave SW p 851 ° Green Blvd `D Ke k�a A i 41 31 Hunt, yaPark � Golden Gat, M CL 0 886 m ,olden Gate Pky Golden Gate Pky Cr m 9 p ° 666 m 32nd Ave SW a 45 Southeast Land m °" e +nt Acquisition Off $)y. <.._ N 881 Radio Rd w Ra e. PH ,� N h S Z North Rd 0 North R d y pa 47 Este Ave-o East Naples Naples Davis Blvd n � cz o a � CL N Co d N d w m o n � Port `D Royal u-- o.+ 41 ��ya Si gndrev� yr /fib to we,. a Map e Ln : Naples Manor Co d I iu 0 U 90 �Z r �pO \Ql a �e w N� 1 a Manatee R, - Belle Meade E4 0 E rn Sabal Palm Rd Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\-Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -11 A -31 Cn (n Cn White Blv N N CnOo m rD 0 � m `D Ke O N to we,. a Map e Ln : Naples Manor Co d I iu 0 U 90 �Z r �pO \Ql a �e w N� 1 a Manatee R, - Belle Meade E4 0 E rn Sabal Palm Rd Tindale- Oliver and Associates, Inc. Hacienda Lakes DRI J:\-Client 600 - 699 \619001 - 00.09- Hacienda Lakes DRI \docs \Interim Submittal \Interim Submittal 2010 02 25.doc 21 -11 A -31 Im I I EXHIBIT � Table 21 -7 Study Network Identification Table %W1 The percentage mdWes internally caph,,W tips using th ea ml roadway nelwprk. Therefore, the r fimg volume is higher that me corresponding to the model —ml tip essighhh- Tindekdlir .dAssociates, Inc. JA- Client600- 699 \619001-00.09 - Hacienda , takes DRl m terim Sabmitmldnterim Submina1 201002 25.dac A -32 Haci.da Lakes DRI 21.12 ®m ®�mmmm UMM0 �mm� ®� ® ®��ommm 11111190�mmmm -::��>• .,<,,a 0�t�s. .�a.�:..a Wyk. -..r, :a�rsFm �: s .�,., �:.asaa��. a��« %W1 The percentage mdWes internally caph,,W tips using th ea ml roadway nelwprk. Therefore, the r fimg volume is higher that me corresponding to the model —ml tip essighhh- Tindekdlir .dAssociates, Inc. JA- Client600- 699 \619001-00.09 - Hacienda , takes DRl m terim Sabmitmldnterim Submina1 201002 25.dac A -32 Haci.da Lakes DRI 21.12 Appendix B Trip Generation Estimate W^ i i Qi V B -1 O c� a a U ti N X _O I ❑ Q) rn c l � C7 m J .4 C c D �U (n o _a � O � Y � J 0) � c c (n cUp O 2 0) � C p O O � O 0 6 c � rn rn � Q rn rn 0 o p = o U Lp N 0) U O + Z l6 M T T V O N O O M O O O W N (D _N M V M O M LO O M W N IV t1 0 N T N N N It (Ij r M 00 Lf) T M N j N 3 +-' 0 r zT O N L` L` It O LO N O O 00 V N O N r- O M 00 00 O- N- LO t- CO T T 0) M N .19 r r T d d O CO O r- (N 00 O LO r- 00 N V O N C In M O LO CO !� V (D M T T T T 0 T T M T N O OO O N M M N M W 00 N — L-- � _ _ _ LO N (D O LO T O L` Ln to 00 G N N M T M r to 00 H N r r 3 +-' O N LO (O M "t W-'T NF,- M 00 P =3 O m -,t O LO M CD (O N N CO O N T T T T T 00 OD O LO O Y r r r R d a C _ _ N M - LO N LO M O LD LO M M M "t LO CO a7 O O M O O A t0 � Cl) T tF V' N CA co 00 �+ Q. LO O �_ O N O 00 M O O N N LO co O Q) •� .` O O M (O (fl T W M M LO M O N Cfl O M O 00 O M 00 N O w M tO N to LO 1` Q F N T (V N (V 4 T N T Ci ti M N N a c a Q)E 'a 7 7 O 7 O 7 O O 'O 'O "D '6 '0 '0 "O 0) c V) c y y R R O O E 00 v It v o M 0 0 0 0 M M 'IT LO CD M'IT N m O O O O M X X M O W W MON LOO 'IT H O ZL. O a� = N p H c iu H UUUUUUUU �UUU o) -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 - -0 -0 - m > > LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Q LL LL LL _ Q O O o_ O o_ O O_ O O o 0_ _O N O N N N N N N N w�� r- LNO M O N C O 0) O 7 O W N 9 S OD H O O O CY) O 2 2 = c 'C N N N CL O C m N O o m M U o (� -a a a) a) 0 a a ❑ ❑ ❑ to U U U Y m 0O H W n r- c m c m c m rnp m �_ coo c O LL O LL 0 LL c rn �` � f0 Lu E m E d) E a � c mo)mom,oc' E (NO tL Lu (n 0) a .� a .� a .� -C O O 7 O � O — Q 0 Q (n Q (n (n U' 2 m W 2 (A B -1 O c� a a U ti N X _O I ❑ Q) rn c l � C7 m J .4 C c D �U (n o _a � O � Y � J 0) � c c (n cUp O 2 0) � C p O O � O 0 6 c � rn rn � Q rn rn 0 o p = o U Lp N 0) U O + Z Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate Daily Internal Capture Matrix School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 1012 Internal Capture: 304 Internal Capture = 4,978 Capture Rate = 14.4% Gross External = 29,620 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 7342 Gross Trips (outbound) 7341 Internal Capture (inbound) 1113 Internal Capture (outbound) 1166 External Trips (inbound) 6229 External Trips (outbound) 6175 External Trips (total) 12404 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 1861 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 931 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 931 Net External = 27,759 B -2 Residential Shopping Center Office Hotel Total In 1 Out I In Out 1 In Out I In I Out 6,80t7,342 7,341 2,234 2,234 418 417 Residential In 6,8 808 45 0 853 0 0 661 Shopping Center 6 294 158 1,113 T3'* 3 220 138 1,166 Office 234 0 220 0 220 234 45 294 13 352 Hotel In 418 0 138 13 151 Out 417 0 158 0 158 Total In 16,794 Out 16,792 School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 1012 Internal Capture: 304 Internal Capture = 4,978 Capture Rate = 14.4% Gross External = 29,620 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 7342 Gross Trips (outbound) 7341 Internal Capture (inbound) 1113 Internal Capture (outbound) 1166 External Trips (inbound) 6229 External Trips (outbound) 6175 External Trips (total) 12404 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 1861 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 931 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 931 Net External = 27,759 B -2 2 Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate AM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 372 Internal Capture: 112 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 189 Gross Trips (outbound) 121 Internal Capture (inbound) 25 Internal Capture (outbound) 20 External Trips (inbound) 164 External Trips (outbound) 101 External Trips (total) 265 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 66 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 33 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 33 B -3 Internal Capture = 202 Capture Rate = 9.4% Gross External = 1,954 Net External = 1,888 Residential Shopping Center Office Hotel Total In Out In Out In Out In Out 234 815 189 121 304 62 36 23 Residential In Out 234 815 8 9 0 0 0 0 8 9 Shopping Center In 189 9 8 8 25 Out 121 8 4 8 20 Office In 304 0 4 0 4 Out 62 0 8 0 8 Hotel In 36 0 8 0 8 Out 23 0 8 0 8 Total In 763 Out 1,021 School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: 372 Internal Capture: 112 Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 189 Gross Trips (outbound) 121 Internal Capture (inbound) 25 Internal Capture (outbound) 20 External Trips (inbound) 164 External Trips (outbound) 101 External Trips (total) 265 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 66 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 33 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 33 B -3 Internal Capture = 202 Capture Rate = 9.4% Gross External = 1,954 Net External = 1,888 M Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate PM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: Worst Case Scenario Assumtions: Student -to -staff ratio: Staff Memebers: Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour: Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour: Student Related Trips: In: 68 Out: 61 (70 trips - 9 staff trips) 138 10.62 (obtained from Hillsborough County School Board) 87 10% 9 (outbound trips) 30% Students from Hacienda Lakes In: 20 (school inbound trips coming from inside Hacienda Lakes) Out: 18 (school outbound trips staying inside Hacienda Lakes) Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 690 Gross Trips (outbound) 719 Internal Capture (inbound) 96 Internal Capture (outbound) 121 External Trips (inbound) 594 Gross Trips Residential Shopping Center Office Hotel Total In Out In Out In Out In Out 841 471 690 719 93 296 42 1 38 296 Pass -By Trips (inbound) In 841 86 6 0 92 Residential Out 471 62 0 0 62 Shopping Center In 690 62 14 201 96 Out 7191 86 22 13 121 Office In 93 0 22 0 22 Out 296 6 14 1 21 Hotel In 42 0 13 1 14 Out 381 0 20 0 20 Total In 1,666 Out 1,524 School Internal Capture: 30% of school trips are assumed to come from Hacienda Lakes School External Trips: Worst Case Scenario Assumtions: Student -to -staff ratio: Staff Memebers: Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour: Staff Memebers Present (leaving) during the PM Peak Hour: Student Related Trips: In: 68 Out: 61 (70 trips - 9 staff trips) 138 10.62 (obtained from Hillsborough County School Board) 87 10% 9 (outbound trips) 30% Students from Hacienda Lakes In: 20 (school inbound trips coming from inside Hacienda Lakes) Out: 18 (school outbound trips staying inside Hacienda Lakes) Pass -by Trips Estimate Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 690 Gross Trips (outbound) 719 Internal Capture (inbound) 96 Internal Capture (outbound) 121 External Trips (inbound) 594 External Trips (outbound) 598 External Trips (total) 1192 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 296 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 148 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 148 B -4 Internal Capture = 486 Capture Rate = 14.6% Gross External = 2,842 Net External = 2,546 Appendix C FSUTMS Plot of Future Background Traffic and Project Traffic Distribution E*] 0 Hacienda Lakes Prgect Treific DisMbut 0.01 00 Ot oel 002 II001 it 0 b'. 0.01 0 0 00� _ } -- 0 n.01 NCI 0 0 y ap 0 O1 col T— — 0.01 v � o 0 o o g ° Do col OOt 001 0 01 0 g J 0 02 0.01 SI �� ff o aDO ° ._ - - - - - Io o "o 0t o 011003 0.02 0.030 00.02 0.02002 0.02 002 nm oot o 003 o I 003 _ X003 Q� r\ 003 _003 o g 0 0 °w o to 0 o 0 g 0 o f g °I g 0 0 0 0 V Oo 0 a ° 0 ° °° o \ p ° D p g o N 002 0 ooze 0 _ D I o o 0 ° o U 'i 0.02 00.03 °$ 0002 ° _ 003 00'00`? 03 ` 0 _ Igo Oo00 o \o ° p ° I Two Lane Road - 01 - �4 . o 0.. r"N 0 Four Lena Road ° su Lane ROStl p p 1 po r o Eight Lm�e Ten Lena Road .W � � -a D Cenlydd Conriacror c -1 Licensed to Tlndale -Or— and Associates Inc. H"c Lakes Project Tr fi DISMb, OP, °o0 I a 0 e o ° oot �_ - o,p o° _ _ o ° 0000 -____ a _ °° o ' ° 0 0 o r ° — 0 4 j' 0. aoe ooe oeo oex�oos o03� oos ow ° -_. °�bj _a o _ o Dal 6 ° 6_. u °o, _ o° P°yt� S ° 0 L 0 60 0 OI - 0 ° O 0.01 . .... , U .4 a %' IItO 00 °0. °,O0 O °Z_ ° °°] 0.0'°' _.0;03 O,i 0°1° \t "N 0O0 0p00, �'\ 0@ OOY °00 OOO 003 ° G 4 0 D O o ° 0.13 OOT o.o, 002 Ta- PI I OOt I 0.3 0°.0.11 at aiB foz Oz Oz i Oal a3] oa ez O ' 0 0 0 002 002r - - ° -- _ _— — _ iNr0� _ 01 0 o_ a 0" o _o + ° om 4� g 0 0 _ _o —o Road xb oo o a t 0 0 o TW ROa0 3 Six L Roa° I °o oo; 0 Ten la RoaE Te le Rcao Licensed to Tindale- Oliver and Associates Inc. C -2 0 O '\ T5711 C7 Ile FTajact T.ft Dl.ft.— I r 0 0 0 O 0 0 u F 0 0 0.01 OA1 0. O 0 0 0 0 06, C-3 Two Le. Road Op F-, Lens R Sim L.. Pk Mg. Lana ROaO AP, T., lam RA Cennale C-- Licensed to Tindale-Oliver and Associates Inc. o� 8 04 o 0 Do / ._.._ .._.. o ooh° 04 °a `rro o 0 o� 0 0 0 U0.YdtiJLD 04 0 ._.._ .._.. o 04 °a og og o C -e Two Lere Road 1 Four Lane Road -- Slx Lere Road Eghl Lore Road Ten Lane Road - Centrold Connector 1 Licensed to Tindale- Oliver and Associates Inc. C -5 Y 6392 ,sag �_ t - �38fi31 50]05 � M886 2ga& 26ge6 2— ,2299,'_ 10817 II' 2906- - . - . _ _ 1865 13t i V 0012 6- P]3 030] 52]] 882 u 398 ° u -5012 ...._„ 0 C5 N g 3618 'ffi nP I pp I' 2950 991 2489 6 92fi4 2099 263 I 20) 9 2 0 1_ �� C -6 x 85]0 30)36 _ 28808 ffi i4 339] 9Y2 951 ,136 __� 4002 H eBN le R X ° i Two Le F,oW Fou Line Roee - -. Siz la Roetl t0], � oatl Tan lane Roeg .I Centrold connacror Licensed to Tindale-Oriver and Associates Inc. He —lal�es 2019 8eck9nwM Volumes 4li - q q m 31442 6392 ,sag �_ t - �38fi31 50]05 � M886 2ga& 26ge6 2— ,2299,'_ 10817 II' 2906- - . - . _ _ 1865 13t i V 0012 6- P]3 030] 52]] 882 u 398 ° u -5012 ...._„ 0 C5 N g 3618 'ffi nP I pp I' 2950 991 2489 6 92fi4 2099 263 I 20) 9 2 0 1_ �� C -6 x 85]0 30)36 _ 28808 ffi i4 339] 9Y2 951 ,136 __� 4002 H eBN le R X ° i Two Le F,oW Fou Line Roee - -. Siz la Roetl t0], � oatl Tan lane Roeg .I Centrold connacror Licensed to Tindale-Oriver and Associates Inc. ,136 __� 4002 H eBN le R X ° i Two Le F,oW Fou Line Roee - -. Siz la Roetl t0], � oatl Tan lane Roeg .I Centrold connacror Licensed to Tindale-Oriver and Associates Inc. .7 F' _..4.- IS a Lekea 0 �I i B.Ig 3/119 Backgmuntl Vdumes ._3602 il$ BOB - 426 n off' \1 Q 32 11136BW11u H103 32126 to m _]1131 _ 450]9 � \` ra �- c n. _...- 31041 36- 3fOgiPo -59fifi 10390 1 '40b0' 6 3� 183)y 011 \ 6 m 74621.. 40916 40/915 3fi]OS/It33]3 N iuy� 91610]# 2fifi0] 22536 20]91 42872 42872 / _- IN 43965 41432 .39535 39535 3]438 37389 2 3 __ &2 6 _z1u yi, 2176 2176 � 41 c -v .7 F' I m _..4.- IS I m IS 0 �I i ._3602 j —Lane RIM Four uM RaM Su Lane R- EigM Lane Roe0 Ten lane Roed C9droitl Con— Licensed to Tindale- Oliver and Associates Inc. Nadenoa Lakes X _.to_ 2114_ Lf ' 21]6 21]6 IN I o �t 36 � t4 , E 29280?essi 26910 25096 r 24911 24659 26702 90089 30009_ 15942 ^ _ 14967 c],ac2]fi0 6 O ail �a•9 � a 1. 9. 4$ W 2/Z � 812 I ..3109 �_ 6138 a$ \ RO __ N16 18 ' 86]0 3B r wl I Tm lane Road ' - Sh La Raatl Eight Lsrro Road ' ep � '� po ^� Ten Lena Road e Cenh0ld COnlrocbr COODII(¢; Licensed to Tindale- Oliver and Associates Inc. C-8 C7 v ('ullyp o Swkq Ea BadcBmuM Vlonae W3 0 H IM3J911 Al wI a ' 39m -! 0 tY 551 30]0 �202U _ 1959 57O w 2%0 : 1192 � _- -� .. 6W 0 ? � � 203 10]2 905 �I B]. 3580 l o }I z 12 edt�43 111X0,0 5ppg0 8>1 92432�]K 4297 3C93]�� 3]303 J490 1�� O6 43905 41432 39535 39535 3]438 3!309 2- ]694 _ 15' L44 m 05l V Iv�..Ory /r - 509890 4]u3] 893 $@y 32 I -W yy 0 9100 107 - g 15]3 - - -�� Iw 3BT 15 ,3261 1)0 m� w i� 1 1101 IS wv fi ze n 3zo 19 N / g; la g 3a 76 F zlu IW N 5 m s' ._. e � 14)5 � � 2874 Bo _ 1d29 � 9e 1°_ 914 29200 28- 2 n � e 25081 w�24B11 24058 26)02 �� 300 p 0 — - 19200 19135 o _ 22.9 c � a 9699 8699 5900 \ Two Lane Roatl Four Lane ROaE s Be Six Lane ROa0 258 Eignt lane R— Ten Lane Ro trokC vector L censed to Tlndale- Oliver and Associates Inc. 1 C -9 • _— Hatlertla Lakes _ — 2019 eerkgmund Volumes _ -... _ _ _. 38 A s .e. l es1i- 0 8; ale C —IJ 11(: C -10 �wl J - -- Two L— Road Four Lare Road Six Lore Road Eghl Lere Road Ten Lane Road - Centroid Connector Licensed to Tindale- Oliver and Assoc atos Inc. D� C -it E* 1*1 �e )5j� 3181/ \6 \m° 1115 mN 31880 ass _ te82 c -12 i To B R. F L R111 Si Law RoM Egn La a.. Ten Uw Roof en c.-n —, Licensed to Tindale- Oliver and Associates Inc. 1*1 Hadentle lakes __ _ 20198sck9rountl Vdumes _ __.. C -13 E4 Appendix D Committed Improvements Iq f W f O a f QM arN Q O1 N O U = J W W T W Q = U N N } LL f Z) O LL' W J O U m d H N d E d O n E m n m U `o m 9 d U N F Z 0 0 o 00000000 O J O over 0 0 o o O M O O 0 o o o � O N O r cum o o o o Y9 O •- 0 00 o o O 0 o o o o 0 0 O Q r 0 u; o o o o 0 0 O 0 0 0 rn 00 o o o ----- 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o 0 0 (D Q) Q O^ LO in o o o o 0 0 N m O. Q o o o o 0 0 Q N O 0 oq o o o o o o 0 0 0 N O m O r M 0M M O Q H M �Q QN Ot0 Q (V N�') O O °y ° m O N N yi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O W N v r o Q } N M LL 0 0 0 o o- O tp ° m m o N M OJ OJ NQOO N b O N b9 F fA M di to M N to fA Q to N di to � di fA N EA m N Y� fA fA to fA N W di M t0 W fA fA Q U3 f Z 0 fA Nl 0 0 to fA 0 0 O.... O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O...to......O O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 00 0 0 N O 0 0 O 000 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Q W n O N 0 in 0 0 0 0 o 0 m o M o I�m0 0 o ro r m orn co Q Q H LL Vi to V3 fA fA t9 � F Z 0 esen- N 0 0 0 0 ---Ow o O 0 0 O° O O 0 . 0 - ---- 0 0 O O 0 0 ---- 0 0 0 0 n00000000o 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 �(J O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q Q � O O N O O 0 0 Q O Q ai O O N m M O (D (D O O N O N r r o N 0 E Q M 1}L INK � - �;-M -- -M. f 2 0 O O. 0 0 0 --- O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O- O O 0 0 O- O O 0 0 - - 0 0 - - 0 0 -- 0 0 O o O O O 0 0 O O u7 O M O 0 0 O O O O N O 0 0 0 O O O O Q O O r 0 O N i° Q1 O O O r 7 (° (D N O LLq W M Q IA LL Q � fA ��4f to �69�V3� Z O oo a O vi O 0 0 0 0 O oQ 0 0 fA EA 0 0 Ot9fAfAfA O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 — 0 0 vio 0 0 o o 0 0 trio 0 0 —. 0 0 0o 0 0 0 O O O Q r O N O r OJ N O Ol Q (p r M 0 OJ h LL � di 69 fA 4i fA fA F = 0 OI 0 0 O o_O N 0 0 0 O° r O 0 0 0 i o 0 0 0 O O 0 0 o---- 0 o 0 0 N O 0 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 ----- 0 0 o 0 000 0 0 M O) r N 0 0 0 0° N Q 7 0 0 0 0 00en0 0 Q N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q m r Q OG N N r � 0 of M Q O N O �D M O N � O m M W } w e»es cn Q »«» w to f»wc»us m Z W C O U Z D J Z W j m e U _ ryM Q�O w___N(n W NO _ U U J fn�C J J d U rn rn rn r rn m N rn rn m m rn o rn m °° rn rn o 0 rn o a m ca m= D o> °' m >'o m K° lo c U m m c o o m y .o U y ``Q°3 P m Y m W K d U c d m F v w d oU U ° o U m `o ow d o =¢> m oa > _ U 'O U m = a o w U w m o o K m `m_ c K m 0 WO C U LL o o m o> o o o° E .o a o = c o o E E of o y E > U E o L N U r U Q S A S o o °c N > > m �> m d o m o C7 a > m ^� o Ear_ .- E y W > E i. LLU' oA�mmc�c�E°m U3�m u �vw ,��uaa ,� m c ro E 3 y a o o v v m m m N m m m ,2 N W m d m u) u) U >in UU o (7��ZDK >E -(7 OU¢H.9 O N O (D M D) 2---o��; Q(DNOr . 1411'01 0 0 N N 0. . .... 0 F H U rAIM O o o o o o o o o- 0 0 0 0 O. r N J O N N N O nr 1° o o o o o o- o o o 0 0 0 0 m O W. O O. M o o m ~O fA fA H V3 fA f9 ' Q fA to O O O O O O r O N O O K O of m �n Q vi LL M N Q N m N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N 6 di L6 ° O r 0 0 O o a N LL O O � O O O O O O ' O N O O O ° O ° O ° .010 O � O O O N OJ o ° r N N O M LL NN O O °y ° m O N N yi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O O W N v r o Q } N M LL 0 0 0 o o- O tp ° m m o N E E 12 E E d c m Q 9 n aci a m E m > ° 0 0 y =U < O; E-2 J m E D o y U E W 2m2 N LLD_' C y�il N O N wF NLL d N p= Z5 1 r C C >L > . n m c� c7 o a n m 0 ICI C� ^O^ �I C� L� l^ O it G� Q A ^O i.. i O IL` Y Q O O J v C 02 E ,�u) UJ zz Gui ° O Q >+- o< V J M -'T L aco �� -rn O O .9 L p 0 Q = ON�G ` , L m a y O CI 0 N O Z CL G1 ? L. N C. U B LL 0 O N NO LO CD O r M O H N U) z O U W N Q' �C O 06 O N C/) z O J d � � I Q 0 - 0 0 O O O O O N O —: 0 O O It Lr) — N Efl EA va d } cc V LL I Q W H d U) W Q G � O U) �+ C p Q L CL °- z U) Z ayi O o z 0 cu c6 w O _0 m co c6 cu m co c c0 U) E 0 LL m co 0 00 m U) of n_1) 0 0 - 0 U C Q :r Q L ''=^ V! co U >o '0 O U N w cu N N o N L 3 U 2 � .-. m rn 0 CL 0 0 orn O M N O Cl) c N O a rLL a a C N m Hco t m o m VN nco N D c0 .2 d o� L co N C c N C � mo C � E .N o rn to c a v E V 06 ° LO 000 C ° 0 N `o 3 3 Q c;� E m (D N a3 c O O J C- c C O N C = c 3 O J ° (6 c � 2 LL ° 2 S O c P O r d N m ° O O O y C N <° °F. p pp c ov � r O E acid m� E r a °' 0 U0 x� �o LL 02 o U- r O O r O O O O N 0 LO Cl) LO t O LO M J .- O r N Y 0 V V � W cA O O cl U d } cc V LL I Q W H d U) W Q G � O U) �+ C p Q L CL °- z U) Z ayi O o z 0 cu c6 w O _0 m co c6 cu m co c c0 U) E 0 LL m co 0 00 m U) of n_1) 0 0 - 0 U C Q :r Q L ''=^ V! co U >o '0 O U N w cu N N o N L 3 U 2 � .-. m rn 0 CL 0 0 orn O M N O Cl) c N O a rLL a a C N m Hco t m o m VN nco N D c0 .2 d o� L co N C c N C � mo C � E .N o rn to c a v E V 06 ° LO 000 C ° 0 N `o 3 3 Q c;� E m (D N a3 c O O J C- c C O N C = c 3 O J ° (6 c � 2 LL ° 2 S O c P O r d N m ° O O O y C N <° °F. p pp c ov � r O E acid m� E r a °' 0 U0 x� �o LL 02 o U- �01 Appendix E Count Data and Adjustment Factors X Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- Golden Gate Blvd QC JOB #: 10509501 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 5/27/2010 977 o.s3 865 a * L 2 540 435 Peak -Hour: 4:45 PM -- 5:45 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM 3.3 4.5 � a 0.0 3.3 3.2 d i 4 2 *0 j < 205 « 639 0.00 0 0 0.95_ « 0 0.92 0.0 41 i %* « 0.0 j < 1.0 « 2.3 0 No 0 1 i 434 *1498 � * �► 65007 U7L- OUIls0 a:Q 0.0 y 0.0 7 _ r 3.0 .► 4.2 4 * 0 4.6 � * 0 97 4 723 " i 3.2 5.0 J � r i 4 L OI Ia « -14' '*F_ L i 4 L J T T r r 1 t F �+► t P� R* = RTOR 15 -Min Count Collier Blvd Period (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) Golden Gate Blvd (Eastbound) Golden Gate Blvd (Westbound) Hourly Beginning At, Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Total, Totals 4:00 PM 0 137 185 0 0 108 166 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 0 12 0 28 721 4:15 PM 0 119 212 0 0 61 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94 0 20 0 35 658 4:30 PM 0 140 213 0 0 97 154 0 2 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0 0 0 _ _ 0. 0 117 '125 0 36 0 22 0 30 0 26 781 802 2962 ___ _ _ _ 0 139 237 0 0 103 139 0 2 1 0 160 250 0 0 1 90 119 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 25 0 29 776 3017 0 178 283 0 0 1113 142 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 104 0 33 0 21 878 3237 303 0_ _ 0 119 140 _0 3 _ _ 0 0___ 0 0 0 0 104 _ _ 0 26 _ 0 _y 15 883 3339 5:45 PM 0 145 221 0 0 I 90 124 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 0 14 0 30 724 3261 i i 'I Peak 15- Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound_ Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Total All Vehicles 0 692 1212 0 0 476 560 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 416 0 104 0 60 3532 Heavy Trucks 0 48 48 20 24 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 160 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/1/2010 8:33 AM E -1 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.quaIitycounts.net) Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- Pine Ridge Rd QC JOB #: 10509502 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 5/27/2010 10100.921776 * 230 685 95 L Peak -Hour: 4:45 PM -- 5:45 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM 3.4 5.2 a 1.3 3.6 6.3 d i 4 528 ♦ 686 j < 48 ♦ 354 0.92 374 ♦ 0.93 157 0.91 r a 7.5 A '• 0 1.3 12000 140 i r 149 ♦ 744 w * P 143 uality Counts (IQ 4.1 ' y 2.1 7 i 2.00 7.5 *1 * f 4.9 7.1 8.0 a * 974 0.921458 i .:n?:° +s = *� kT7 r:lb:L€::C..T;C7ti i 3.2 7.1 L J i 4 L i o F 3EJ11� — ,p a %*� 1 T T r �t R* = RTOR 15 -Min Count Period Collier Blvd (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) Pine Ridge Rd (Eastbound) Pine Ridge Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Totals 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 40 189 38 1 28 54 198 36 2 34 24 26 143 26 1 29 144 24 6 39 119 75 21 0 123 84 20 0 20 11 29 19 27 5 0 3 44 6 0 1 818 871 4:30 PM 23 201 38 4 25 15 180 25 3 31 155 97 11 0 22 31 31 4 0 2 898 4:45 PM 34 225 47 1 21 24 186 24 3 36 '156 108 17 0 14 32 45 7 0 5 985 3572 5:00 PM 32 252 51 0 19 23 160 33 1 24 153 84 15 1 16 32 31 12 0 4 943 3697 5:15 PM 36 275 38 1 31 21 23 164 _27 0 _ 2_7 17 37 - 0 22 188 81 2 1 187 101 12 0 186 90 10 0 33 34 31 47 25 50 i 40 8 4 1 1012 3838 41. 8 0 3 1082 4022 36 8 0 1 923 3960 :30 M ' 37 88 41 2 27 5:45 PM 32 213 33 0 23 18 152 22 2 22 Peak 15 -Min Flowrates i Northbound Left Thru Right U R* Left Southbound Thru Right U R*7 Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ricilht U R* All Vehicles 148 1152 164 8 108 92 700 148 0 88 748 404 48 0 124 188 164 32 0 12 4328 Heavy Trucks 4 64 12 8 40 4 24 20 4 0 0 0 180 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/1/2010 8:33 AM E -2 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) CI Type of peak hour beinq reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- Green Blvd QC JOB #: 10509503 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 5/27/2010 949 0.871459 a * L 120 829 o Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM 2.3 6.4 a t 0.8 2.5 0.0 J i 4 193 r 231 J t 0 f 0 0.83 0 ♦ 0.89 « 0 0.00 1.6 -] r a y « 6.9 1 < 0.0 « 0.0 370 0 139 *4 : 00 89 1228 0 0 aQuality Counts .2 6.3 0.0 �2 "F_ a * 984 0.891317 ` a 2.1 6.0 L r + V 0 0 C1 tlJ « 0 L1.+ c T T a aL r �*1 f � r �F R' = RTOR 15 -Min Count Period Collier Blvd (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) Green Blvd (Eastbound) Green Blvd (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left _ Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Totals 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 17 255 0 5 12 265 0 4 0 0 0 0 190 21 0 8 175 10 0 17 39 55 0 14 0 0 15 0 8 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 557 567 4:30 PM 4:45_ PM 17 267 0 1 13 254 0 1 0 0 0 0 204 26 0 8 200 32 0 10 39 47 0 17 0 0 25 0 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 585 589 2298 5:115 PM 15 3261 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6073 2349 ' 2455 0 200 18 0 3 75 0 27 0 14 9 0 5 0 0 230 30 0 13 61 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 1 738 , 0 3 0 ___0 _ i -215 21 -- 0 11 51 -0_ - _9 0___ 0 0 0- 0 0 61 __ _ -- -- Peak 15 -Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U R' Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Total All Vehicles 84 1372 0 20 01 0 920 120 0 52 244 0 108 0 32 I 0 0 0 0 0 2952 Heavy Trucks 4 64 0 0 32 4 16 0 0 0 0 0 120 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 i 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/1/2010 8:33 AM E -3 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) Tvoe of peak hour beina reoorted: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- Golden Gate Pkwy QC JOB #: 10513601 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 6/10/2010 799 0.91 1324 o L ]2!45 554 o Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM 3.0 4.9 � a 2.0 3.4 0.0 J i 4 567 ♦ 391 j ! 00 0 0.92 0 ♦ 0.93 ♦ 0 0.00 2.1 r a 4 +h 1.8 � ! 0.0 ♦ 0.0 ' 0.0 ♦ r 0.0 708 ♦ 317 -t i 0 ♦ 0 � * � 322 933 0 � i auali Ly Counts 2.3 ♦ 2.8 7 � 0.0 ♦ 0.0 2.2 6.2 0.0 7 a * 871 0.871255 ❑ "i �.Ya rJt? -.. �, ��_:� i t COLLECTION SERVICES 3.2 5.2 J � � J r i {► .i ! 0 lop J J i 4 ! ! 1 ? i v t I F 7 F R' = RTOR 7TM_in_C_ou_nF7 Collier Blvd Period (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) Golden Gate Pkwy (Eastbound) Golden Gate Pkwy (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* I Left Thru Right U R* Totals 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 80 177 0 0 0 83 196 0 0 0 0 0 125 30 0 22 103 25 0 30 81 0 37 0 92 0 34 1 23 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 575 0 0 0 0! 579 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 82 193 0 0 0! 78 200 0 0 0 0 0 141 38 0 39 131 37 0 37 91 0 49 0 83 0 54 0 15 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 648 0 0 0 0 639 5:00 PM 84 237 0 0 0 0 107 35 0 25 104 0 60 0 1� 0 0 D 0 0 668 r2441 2534 5:15 PM 84 276 0 0 0 0 141 31 0 37 89 69_ 0___ 12 :_ 0_ 0 0 0 0 739 1 2694 160 30 0 31 __0 _— _ 102 0 80 0 10 0 _ __ 0 0 0 0 711 2757 146 30 0 26 96 0 55 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 x_644 2762 Peak 15 -Min L Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates I Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Total Thru Ri M U R* All Vehicles 336 1104 0 0 0 0 564 124 0 148 356 0 276 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 2956 Heavy Trucks 4 84 0 0 16 12 4 0 4 0 0 0 124 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 j 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/22/2010 2:14 PM E -4 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) Tvoe of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- 1 -75 NB Ramps QC JOB #: 10482605 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 2/23/2010 10140.891394 't t L 81 928 o Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM 2.2 3.0 i t 3.5 2.0 0.0 10204-0 j L 594, 198 0.00 0 ♦ 0.98 « 0 0.87 ✓ i 3.9 « 0.0 j L 1.7 « 3.5 0.0 ♦ « 0.0 0 ♦ 0 '11 r 139 ♦ 0 9351335 0 Quality Counts : 0.0 ♦ 0.0 7 r 4.3 ♦ 0.0 4.0 3.1 0.0 i t 10680.942270 J i .:& CO iL!_C:Yigfr; SERViCtS 2.3 3.4 1 o L r i V L ? L �► � J 11 � V ��j h t �,r 0 L r i 4 L 11TT s L R* = RTOR 15 -Min Count Collier Blvd Period (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) 1 -75 NB Ramps (Eastbound) 1 -75 NB Ramps (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At, Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U ftLR ee Thru Ri ht U R* Totals 4:00 PM 225 245 0 2 0 0 227 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 9 0 0 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 214 288 0 0 0 1259 249 0 1 0 1 0 154 26 0 0 0 205 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 10 0 0 38 0 21 0 0 732 798 4:45 PM 250 294 0 1 0 0 205 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 9 0 0 812 3127 Peak 15 -Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 94B 1464 0 4 0 32 48 0 0 924 56 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 0 72 0 0 8 0 0 3560 96 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad IStopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 2/26/2010 5:54 AM E -5 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- 1 -75 SB Ramps QC JOB #: 10482606 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 2/23/2010 10550.85 299 a * L 0 1026 2s Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM 2.6 3.7 a # 0.0 2.5 3.4 o *49 j L 00 0 _ 0.97 0 �► 0.93 ♦ 0 0.00 0.0 'P a , ♦ 4.1 J ,_ L 0.0 * 0.0 0.0 989 -0 940 7 i 00 129 h * � 0 2249 101 uality Counts a:Q 2.2 ♦ 2.1 7 : 0.00 9.3 �0.0 3.7 10.9 a * 1966 0.95 2350 ;, COLLELT$ON" S�.kCES wI 2.3 4.0 1 L J.► i b sL �♦j4111111111111111111,E 0 F 11� L 1 I I r � i �► 1 L _T' e*F- R* = RTOR 15 -Min Count Collier Blvd Period (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) I -75 SB Ramps (Eastbound) 1 -75 SB Ramps (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals 4:00 PM 0 466 22 0 0 4:15 PM 0 511 38 0 0 5 2 237 0 0 0 225 0 1 0 21 0 222 0 16 0 201 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 973 994 4:30 PM 0 469 26 0 0 4 234 0 0 0 18 0 217 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 968 4:45 PM 0 526 35 0 0 3_205 0 0 0 14 0 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 974 3909 5:00 PM 0 585 31 0 0 5:15 PM 0 594 26 0 0! 8 11 225 0 0 0 300 0 1 0 5 0 244 0 14 0 229 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1098 4034 1175 42151 5:30 PM 0 543 24 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 15 0 227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1059 430 _5_45 PM 0 527 20 0 0 I 6 •. 0 0 0 15 0 240 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0; Peak 15 -Min Flowrates Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Left Thru Right U R* Total Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* I Left Thru Right U R* All Vehicles 0 2376 104 0 0 44 1200 0 4 0 56 0 916 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4700 Heavy Trucks Pedestrians 0 108 12 0 0 24 0 0 j 4 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 160 0 Bicycles Railroad ,Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 2/26/2010 5:54 AM E -6 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) v Tvne of neak hour being renorted: Intersection Peak Method for determininq peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- Davis Blvd QC JOB #: 10482607 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 2/23/2010 19400.972348 F * L 535 1270 135 Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM 2.2 4.3 a 22 1.4 8.9 .► i 4 898 * 611 j t 204 ♦ 348 193 113 y 0.95 r 78 0.77 22 4o 4L a 3.1 1 t 3.9 r 3.7 5.3 y t 5.1 921 y 197 i i 66 y 378 h * � 285 1530 133 � 1 7 ity Counts l Va1 3.5 y 3.6 7 i 1.5 y 6.1 1.4 4.8 3.8 a * 15330.941948 s., 11 11' i - .,r; ". I, ;" :, CO,_LE.CTOON SERVICES 1.7 4.2 0 � 0 I L F V o t 11TTP t lot I.F � r � s -1 e F R* = RTOR 15 -Min Count Collier Blvd Period (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) Davis Blvd (Eastbound) Davis Blvd (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals 4:00 PM 67 369 12 0 15 33 293 93 1 55 116 33 26 0 14 12 23 14 0 17 1193 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 57 369 23 0 8 62 328 23 0 12 28 34 272 80 1 52 300 75 1 32 130 37 27 0 133 45 28 0 22 13 15 23 15 15 0 17 25 20 0 27 1168 1181 4:45 PM 64 378 15 0 12 40 248 73_ 2 30 116 32 35 0 21 10 19 33 0 15 1143 4685 5:00 PM 58 412 30 0 16 28 327 71 0 48 _ 163 32 43 0 10 29 26 35 0 28 1356 4848 _ 5:15 PM 5:30 75 381 22 0 8 16 0 1 34 34 307 89 0 70 320 69 1 56 183 27 21 0 160 35 17 27 16 13 29 0 14 31 0 1 1316 ! 4996 5:4 a., 19 0 ^ 36 316 94 2 38 105 19 33 , 25 0 Peak 15 -Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* All Vehicles 232 1648 120 0 64 1 112 1308 284 0 192 652 128 172 0 40 116 104 140 0 112 5424 Heavy Trucks Pedestrians 0 96 4 0 4 24 8 8 16 0 4 0 0 8 8 0 172 8 Bicycles Railroad iStopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 2/26/2010 5:54 AM E -7 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) Tvoe of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- The Lord S Way QC JOB #: 10482601 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 2/23/2010 16000.94 964 a * 35 1564 1 Peak -Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM Peak 15 -Min: 8:30 AM -- 8:45 AM 9.9 7.9 a t L 14.3 9.8 0.0 r i 4 46 ♦ 0 j t 3 f 3 0.78 0 *► 0.96 ♦ 0 0.50 .► i v 10.9 r 0.0 j , °.. t 0.0 * 0.0 0.0 A `. ' r 0.0 29 0 29 7 r 00 0 � * � " �° uality Counts a:Q 3.4 - y 3.4 : r 0.0 �► 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.0 a * 15930.96 971 rt fvrt° c DA`A i co: LiCTION SERVICES 9.7 7.8 1t J 111 �► � � �► 0 F ,� �►r J d ♦ 4 t ® I T T T r r i b t R' = RTOR 15 -Min Count Period Collier Blvd (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) The Lord S Way (Eastbound) - -- - - The Lord S Way (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U R* Le ft Thru Right U R* Totals 7:00 AM 0 192 0 0 0 0 299 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 a 0 0 3 0 0 503 7:15 AM 1 237 0 0 0 0 374 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 625 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 2 239 0 1 0 2 247 0 0 0 6 220 0 0 0 0 0 0 406 4 0 0 402 10 01 0 364 11 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 8 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 657 8:15 AM 1 251 0 0 0 0 380 8 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 648 2582,. 830 AM 242 O 0_ 0 0 418 6 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 -_ 0 0 67 8:45 AM 6 246 1 0 O 0 _„ 390 13 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 666 2598 Peak 15 -Min Flowrates _ Northbound Left Thru Right U R* Southbound Left Eastbound Thru Right U R* Left Westbound Total Thru Ri ht U R. - Left Thru Right U R* All Vehicles 8 968 0 0 0 0 1672 24 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2712 Heavy Trucks Pedestrians 0 76 0 0 0 144 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 224 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 2/26/2010 5:53 AM E -8 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) a Tvoe of peak hour beina reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- The Lord S Way QC JOB #: 10482602 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 2/23/2010 1413 0.88 1860 a 35 1375 3 Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:30 PM -- 5:45 PM 1.6 3.5 � a � 0.0 1.6 0.0 r i 4 53 «0 j t 7 « 7 073 0 » 0.97 « 0 0.88 ✓ 3.8 «0.0 d t 14.3 «14.3 44 44 : i 0* 6 h * � F 21 1852 4 uality Counts a:Q 0.0 » 0.0 7 i 0.0 » 0.0 �9.5 3.5 0.0� a * 1422 0,93 �1877 CO_ -LECMN SER'JIM, 1.5 3.5 1 o L � t OLIO »« 4NN► ,, * ,,� �,+ �•+ a a� � 1 TT1 r a a� � t r*F_ R* = RTOR 15 -Min Count Period Collier Blvd (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) The Lord S Way (Eastbound) The Lord S Way (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht V--W— R* Totals 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 3 418 1 1 0 2 401 0 0 0 0 0 306 4 0 274 18 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 746 702 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5 438 0 0 0 3 462 0 0 0 0 1 348 5 1 310 9 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 806 796 3050 5:00 PM 5 495 3 0 0 1 322 8 0 0 _. 0 0 11 0 0 4 0 0, 846 3150 5:15 PM 1 439 0 0 0 0 350 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 802 3250 5:30 PM 6 435 1 1 0 0 391 11 1 0. 0 0 15 0 0 0 _ _ 11 0— 0 0 0 0 0- }, o 0 „ 3308 - 41 5:45 PM 6 483 0 2 0 1 312 11 0 0 __. Peak 15 -Min Flowrates Northbound Left Thru Right U R* Left Southbound _ Thru Right U R* Eastbound Westbound Total Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U R* All Vehicles 24 1740 4 4 0 0 1564 44 4 0 0 0 60 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 3456 Heavy Trucks Pedestrians 4 44 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 84 j 0 Bicycles Railroad i fStopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 2/26/2010 5:53 AM E -9 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www,qualitycounts.net) Tvne of neck hour heino renorted: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- Rattlesnake Hammock Rd QC JOB #: 10482603 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 2/23/2010 15940.94 951 * zsa 13zs 7 Peak -Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM Peak 15 -Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM 10.7 7.6 a t 4. 5.8 11.7 14.3 J i 4 340M195j t 0f 2 0.90 1 y 0.93 ♦ 0 o.so -1 .► i b 6.8 4- 4.6 j t 0.0 r 0.0 0.0 .► ♦ 0.0 271 0 75 1 r 2♦ 2 � * � a2 750 8 uality Counts a:Q 4.1 y 2.7 7 r 0.0 �► 50.0 9.8 8.4 0.0 7 * ".` ik.:', 6:.. - i 14060.90 832 .�1't., COLLECTION SERVICES 11.2 8.5 1 9 � d 9t �� 3'�J111� � '� r•` ° t 11TTTP t R* = RTOR nt Collier Blvd (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) Rattlesnake Hammock Rd _ (Eastbound) Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U * W_ Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals F7:OO 15 20 198 0 0 0 16 180 0 0 0 0 324 26 0 9 42 0 4 0 11 333 38 2 107 51 0 0 10 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 634 649 8:00 0 8 8.1 5 AM 19 199 0 0 0 9 43 2 11 45 0 5 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 665 8.30 AM 20 _184 _ 0 0 0 8:45 AM 1 25 206 0 0 0 i 1 332 59 4 _ 25 47 0 9 4 ,. 0 302 54 1 15 46 0 9 0 i i _ 12 0 _ 0 _ _ _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2699 670 2640 Peak 15 -Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U R* Southbound Eastbound Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Westbound Total Left Thru Right U R* All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 112 812 0 0 0 8 60 0 0 1432 172 0 88 204 4 36 0 0 152 12 8 0 4 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2916 244 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 2/26/2010 5:53 AM E -10 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) Tx n of nonk hnnr hpinn rpnortprl- InterRectinn Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- Rattlesnake Hammock Rd QC JOB #: 10482604 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 2/23/2010 13790.841865 a t Sao loza 1s Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM 1.3 4.0 � a t o.s 1.s o.o '� a 480 ♦ 350 j fL 1 4► 6 0.95 ♦ 3 0.75 2.5 ♦ 2.3 t t. 0.0 ♦ 0.0 0.92 0 ♦ 0.0 * `- ' f 0.0 449 99 1 i 2* 2 01 t '36'5 °° 2 � Quality Counts 2.0 - y 1.0 7 � 0.0 A 0.0 7.4 4.4 0.0 a t 11250.881638 C OLLECTION SERVIC E3 1.5 4.6 1 �� a �L *o* L V 0 T T T r ,< R* = RTOR 15 -Min Count Period Collier Blvd (Northbound) Collier Blvd (Southbound) Rattlesnake Hammock (Eastbound) Rd Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Totals 4:00 PM 35 339 0 (F-0 0 250 48 2 13 61 0 12 1 10 0 2 0 0 1 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 40 341 1 0 0 32 343 0 0 0 0 0 220 41 3 16 278 51 3 21 70 0 12 0 88 0 16 0 15 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 17;7;4 0 0 0 0 4:45 PM ' 31 351 1 0 0 0 236 58 6 12 84 1 13 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 808 3187 5:00 PM 38 426 0 0 0 0 251 56 3 18 _ 98 0 6 0 20 0 _ _ 1 0 0 1 _ 918 ? 3331 5:15 PM 43 320 0 0 0 0 251 52 7 19 102 0 10 0 21 2 0 0 0 0 827 3399 5:30 PM 32 378 1 0 1 5:45 PM 23 376 0 0 0 0 0 306 79 3 22 216 69 2 25 64 " " ' ` "` ,1 85 ?'r I') - 1 =. 0 0 1 0 0 1__ _ _0 =. 0 i Peak 15 -Min Flowrates Northbound __ - Left Thru Right U R* Left Southbound - Thru Ri ht U R* Eastbound — — Left Thru Rig ht U R* Left Westbound - — Thru Ri ht U R* Total All Vehicles 152 1704 0 0 0 0 1004 224 12 72 0 24 0 392 0 24 0 8 0 0 80 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 3672 124 Heavy Trucks Pedestrians 12 80 0 0 0 4 4 8 Bicycles Railroad Sto ed Buses Comments: Report generated on 2/26/2010 5:53 AM E -11 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) T of no L, hn,,r hainn rannrtart- Intarcartinn Paak Method for determininq peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Collier Blvd -- US 41 QC JOB #: 10509504 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 5/27/2010 659 0.90 991 + * ss 3sa 17o Peak -Hour: 4:00 PM -- 5:00 PM Peak 15 -Min: 4:15 PM -- 4:30 PM .s . a t 2 71 2.1 4.1 7.1 .+ a 4 927 197 j f, 173 * 424 0.90 263 0 0.96 * 222 0.73 4.6 _j J i 4 * 7.1 1 < 11.0 * 9.9 - -' 3.4 y '. � * 8.6 977 517 Z r 29 ♦ 457 � ? � 586 640 29 �Jli -y f'�(�U�{ -� t L Counts 3. 2 _ ♦1.57 113.8.► 4.8 *1 ♦ f 3.8 8.1 3.4 �7 a:Q 940 0.921255 i, .h.Igf' .ri " » "i C3N t]ATA Ct7LLECTION SERVICES i 3.0 6.0 �► � J 111 � ,, * ,, 0 L t 111 T T T P -t t Ih f F R* = RTOR Collier Blvd Period (Northbound) Collier Blvd US 41 (Southbound) (Eastbound) US 41 (Westbound) _ Total Hourly Thru Right U R* BeM n nd At U R* ,Left g g Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru_ Right Totals 4:00 PM 146 154 0 0 2 51 83 5 2 19 41 54 134 5 0 1 7 72 63 0 4 842 ' _4:15 PM 146 179 _1 0 5_32 89 6 2_23 54 77 121 4 3 6 71 41 _0 2 862 PM 152 127 11 0 4 109 5 1 15 47 56 131 7 0 8 29 32 0 1 4:30 4:45 PM 142 180 2 0 4 113 90_ 0 _12i 31 76 _ 128 8 _0_ 8 50 29 5:00 PM 5:15 PM 137 158 1 0 1 158 185 0 0 0 26 52 _ _ 82 5 2 13 108 2 3 17 37 78 114 4 56 65 154 3 0 0 6 4 54 49 0 3 54 27 0 1 770 889 3243 3270 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 129 128 0 0 2 154 106 1 0 4 43 33 i i i 118 9 3 13 74 5 3 15 31 104 107 5 39 61 110 8 0 0 5 7 50 49 0 1 54 29 0 0 797 703 3286 3159 Peak 15 -Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U R* All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 584 716 4 0 20 20 72 4 I 128 12 356 24 8 92 16 0 1 216 308 484 16 20 8 8 12 24 0 284 164 0 8 20 20 3448 200 Pedestrians 0 4 0 0 4 Bicycles Railroad iStopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/1/2010 8:33 AM E -12 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) Temp of naak hnnr heinn rannrtpd, Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: CR 951 -- Walmart Signal QC JOB #: 10509505 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 5/27/2010 10290.941159 i t L 0 884 14s Peak -Hour: Peak 15 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM -Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM 1.7 4.3 a t 0.0 1.e 0.7 J i 4 0 *0 j < 78 « 165 10001 0 0 0.94 « 0 0.79 0.0 r a v «0.0 _f < 0.0 « 0.0 0.0 .� *N''* 0.0 , 0 y 0 1 : 87 ♦ 234 � t �. 4 ,069,01 �� Quality Counts 0.0 .► 0.0 7 s 0.0 y 0.4 � t P o.o a.7 0.0 i t 9750.941174 `f. .i L :Pi: Fi, t�,; -; C. t„C E+ COLLECTION SERVICES �' t 1.6 4.3 L �.+ a �L *o* � 1TTTr s 5#- R* = RTOR 15 -Min Count Period CR 951 (Northbound) CR 951 (Southbound) Walmart Signal (Eastbound) Walmart Signal (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Totals 4:00 PM 0 268 15 0 5 28 191 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 8 0 8 556 4:15 PM 4:30 PM 0 288 17 1 10 0 257 16 0 7 _ 29 32 218 _ 0 221 0 2_ 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 17 0 8 _ 2 18 0 2 0 10 0 14 621 564 603 2344 4:45 PM 5:00 PM _ . 0 278 19 1 8 ,. ., .. 37 , 215 0 0 - 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 22 0 3 0 7 - .. 0 21 2356 0 -_ - 0 _ 0_ 9 __ 0 0 0 0 —0 0 , 2368W 2337 5:1 P 0 2 0 24_. 18 0'WL 0 1 0 4 0 6 533 5:30 PM 0 244 22 0 4 24 205 0 6 0 5:45 PM 0 209 14 1 5 24 183 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 4 0 11 475 2209 Peak 15 -Min Northbound Southbound i Eastbound _ Westbound Total Flowrates : Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 0 1128 80 8 36 0 52 0 104 0 988 0 16 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 0 0 12 0 72 0 0 2532 68 Pedestrians 0 0 0 4 4 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/1/2010 8:33 AM E -13 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) N Tvnp of npak hnur hpinn renorted- Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Isle of Capri /SR 951 -- Manatee Rd QC JOB #: 10482608 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 2/23/2010 14370,961598 F 0 1257 18o * � Peak -Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM Peak 15 -Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM 0.0 0.0 a o.o 0.0 0.10 4 4 0 * 0 j t. 167 f 249 0.00 0 A 0.98- F 0 0.89 0.0 ✓ i to 4. 0.0 j t 0.0 * 0.0 ' 0.0 0 r o.0 0 0 7 t 82 * 266 .� * �. 5 1423 94 F a:Qo.o ua ty Counts o.0 7 r o.o y o.o ` t t P 0.0 0.0 0.0 a * 13440.941522 -1 t fFt;%P,. ?gTl[ytN DATA. COLLECTION SERVICES i 0.0 0.0 J i 4 L 1 �. o F r L i 4 J J i 4 1TTr ihw* f R* RTOR 15 -Min Count Period Isle of Capri/SR 951 (Northbound) Isle of Capri /SR 951 (Southbound) Manatee Rd (Eastbound) Manatee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals 4:00 PM 0 351 27 1 0 44 311 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 22 0 20 793 4:15 PM 0 345 14 2 0 41 272 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 29 0 22 0 21 746 4:30 PM 0 347 18 1 0 45 327 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 22 0 24 807 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 0 331 23 2 0 0 372 27 2 0 42 37 48 314 0 2 0 305 0 2 0 311_ 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -s_ 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 18 0 _18 0 15 0 21 0 12 ,• - 0 19 0 27 774 794 3120 3195 5:15 PM 0 373 26 0 0 5:30 PM 0 402 17 0 0 34 280 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 326 17 0 0 52 275 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 I I 0 9 0 28 724 3145 Peak 15 -Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total Flowrates Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Rig ht U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* All Vehicles Heavy Trucks ; 0 1492 104 0 0 1 0 0 0 192 1244 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 0 0 112 0 72 3288 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 2/26/2010 5:54 AM E -14 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) Tvna of naak hnur heinn renorted- Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: US 41 -- Rattlesnake Hammock Rd CIC JOB #: 10513602 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 6/10/2010 17960.9011088 Peak -Hour: 4:45 PM -- 5:45 PM 1A 1.3 i 47s � L ss 1221 Peak 15 -Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM + f t.0 1.4 1.7 J i 4 320 r 67 j L 175 f 451 0.98 154 y 0.92 y 138 0.87 1.6 d i V 1.5 j L 0.6 r 1.8 1.3 ► f 1.4 280 y 59 7 i 138 y 681 1 � � 94 763 130 �1 ly C�t l a:Q 1.8 y 3.4 7 - i 3.6 ♦ 1.9 �t * f 2.1 1.6 2.3 i * 1425 o.95 987 i 1.7 1.7 L J .► i 4 dL 4 L 11TTTr T L R* = RTOR 15 -Min Count Period US 41 (Northbound) US 41 (Southbound) Rattlesnake Hammock (Eastbound) Rd Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru U Ri ht R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Totals 4:00 PM 21 202 23 3 3 108 290 22 20 8 12 21 5 1 10 34 21 18 0 22 844 4:15 PM 4730 PM 16 183 27 1 2 19 228 14 3 6 77 69 264 20 17 2 274 21 18 4 24 24 3 0 14 32 13 0 12 4 29 28 24 18 0 27 33 30 0 17 770 827 4:45 PM 5:00 PM 14 208 27 2 4 25 177 35 2 2 69 119 303 15 18 1 301 26 29 6 13 33 3 0 22 37 3 1 11 11 1 37 1 37 24 22 0 19 31 16 0 21 823 901 3264 1 5:15 PM 24 210 24 _ 4 3 349 16 17 7 14 41 5 1 13 31 40 20 o 23 _- 3 _1 -11 94 _ _26822- 22 .. 115 43 3 1 26 31 1 0 10_ 12 _29 25 43 „. 9.;:; 23 14 2 30 _ _i0_ 01 763 3454 5:45 PM 192 27 0 13 1 78 238 19 14 7 i I Peak 15 -Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates - - Left Thru Right U R* Left — - Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Right U - R* Left — — Thru Right U R* Total All Vehicles 96 840 96 16 12 444 1396 64 68 28 56 164 20 4 52 124 160 80 0 92 3 48 48 Heavy Trucks Pedestrians 8 4 4 4 0 16 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 8 4 0 12 Bicycles Railroad iStopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 6/22/2010 2:14 PM E -15 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) Tvna of naak hmir heino renorted: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: US 41 -- San Marco Rd QC JOB #: 10513603 CITY /STATE: Naples, FL DATE: 6/10/2010 121 !0.791163 i 1--1 t I 20 101 o Peak -Hour: Peak 15 -Min: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM 4:15 PM -- 4:30 PM 5.0 9.8 0. t 10.0 4.0 0.0 J i 4 40 t 40 ! t 0 f o 60 9 0 0.87 0 0.00 .i 4 4 5.0 1 12.5! t 0.0 * 0.0 61 y 21 0 * o t 20 123 0 "F a:Quality Counts 8.2 �► 0.0 7 - : 0.0 4 0.0 '1 t P 0.0 8.9 0.0 i t 122 0.821143 a t 3.3 7.7 L aO !t 0 ��► �J i 4L� t � 1T i b� ! t R' = RTOR 15 -Min Count Period US 41 (Northbound) US 41 (Southbound) San Marco Rd (Eastbound) San Marco Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Ri ht U R* I Le Thru Right U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* Left Thru Ri ht U R* 1 Totals 4:00 PM 5 31 0 0 0 0 24 5 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 71 ,— 415PM _'._ 6 39 00 OZ 0 — -- _ 31 5 0 7_ d 0 0l 0.___0 0 o 0 _93 _ 4:30 PM j 4 28 0 0 0 4:45 PM 5 30 0 0 0 0 0 30 3 0 18 6 0 0 0 12 0 10 0 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 73 324 5:00 PM -_6 - 26_ 0_ 0 0 f 022 6 0_0 10 0 3 0 0 i___0__- 0 0____ _ 0_ 0 72 � 325 5:15 PM 8 25 0 0 0! 0 37 2 0 0 8 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 315 5:30 PM 5:45 PM 4 27 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 23 10 0 20 4 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 10 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 57 299 283 Peak 15 -Min Flowrates Northbound Southbound Eastbound Left Thru Right U R* Westbound Total Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* Left Thru Right U R* All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 24 156 0 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 124 20 0 4 0 0 28 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 372 20 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad IStopped Buses, Comments: Report generated on 6/22/2010 2:14 PM E -16 SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http: / /www.qualitycounts.net) m �i Aa�hmd H" g11lJlR COWrT' ]IA MINVALIi1WT[ NV W KMY �[MW} 4MRtr• C�Wee Cwnr)1� ^� OWe IYe1 w �f�rr r1 vrsr trArwl��l vrt IYaI Vor LIFYH Crlsl Vralrb Rrws1 DNYr rYn� b Tr +l E -17 Cpl 1` v P�lpr M a09 L ftp 8W Gt Slb Pl.k Ser.lr< W.Y pr Trle T.W Y.�n 08rpei E -18 ©��Cz�7' ® ®0•a•�Ii71E7 ®���������� om C�"� Via• ®i3. 9�'d1E3'7+ 17 ���fT- i..��i�����i mom �wm� ©M�p�RL'�3TV:�� ®���lP'^iV^Rr' aL"'".i"� ^� F".L E^ B�RTllC#��fIIi iIIa ®r---- D?nikv?vu� l�i�����i ©��m C7® MF (�'[�Ri•C�"'� ®M wo�� ®t! ©ix?9E?.afID�'�7 ®�nil�i+�O���������i ®ate �"'��i „��i�����i �inr[��� ®� ®('.�� ®ET'lJ�mi'S�a� IMMMEM M ima� ww �fili� ®a•T^.� ^�".u7 c4�S>•t�'s` EMMMORM ® ®D•i ®EL'J�iIIla���i������ O93 llLnio�L�SLG'!."� ZMMMMMi =W i �® WMEMP ®gym - •+ter.— �iiDtE` di l6'�'aIIR"_itI�C4'n!7�"..at ®li fa•iT.T9 ®Fti� OW ® ©�� -i��� �� Asa 0�Rn a�� t! F )�t"'fltiLt�Cl'�ST..,�C9"'�l"J' T” Ufa • ® ® ©��f1���7a��"�'ii_,��i������ T L q M r�.�"Si`3''^..! ®� ®����i3a�t Fa• ®Rx ����Cti�fl°'�7"3?' SLR+ 3:'^ � ._�C�T_^i•�EQfO•I�� ®�.'l�i ® ®a� ffn- .. �� ®i��L^"1i• *.'�L^'E�� Otl' ®�t7�117�0���i������ mom ��i�li . ..P1' [ "tea• ®l MMML vnlmwn� ®ate IMMMKniR1�f3iu'7i£�a MOOMMOSM ®i��'s..:.f;.;^"�0'.'. -i• F�i(�1� mKMM•• ® aM��tl ®MMffM ®i'fAa��� ir-,IM�FMMM MOM WM� izvmn IMM �������r��������� vorgm E -18 E -19 O Y l0 d r- m d M V M Lo = M F C0 00 U Cl) Y N LL O Q N 0 ILL O V M C' 00 m V 'T � Vl � r N h (D W O f� 7 N W In W co W V N M J t- N O C4, l O N _O O W m O 0) ti W (D N t` to O V f� W W W V M Q N O W W W N M V V In W IT u7 W M r N N co r W F-- r N N N N N N N N— N O Cl) H V (n M (D t- N O t- O N O (0 In Cl m r r N V r (o U') M m m V N N N W W W N (f) (f7 O CD W W m M N �_ N (o N (o co M M' M (n T N N m n t- r CO W M (() W N V (n O) O D N t O W Ln � 00 O M N r M N CD "t - W O(n r W CD N O N N '- N .0 W N co Ln co W O M� W W V I-- M V W V M m M O (� (n N 0 J t� LO V O M V CD O W m (n V m h m M N V r M (� Q M W W t� O M W W m m m O� m N O W (D M W F r N N N N N N N N N '- M O F r co M Wrl_ (c m r N M co m 0) co W V M N M N O tl- 0) M O m V N N M co (n M N W O (n W O C W N M V cr M V l() W M r W CD (n co N W T CDO j > N w O t� (D W M r (f) m M m y In M (D co co co (f) LO CO co N N N CD V N CO M N .- (n O N W M V Cl T (n (D to V V M N O W 0) m V M W N V O In t, W m W N N M W V V V O m M M co m W m m 0 0 r M (o In co (D (D J r M N N V CD m N f- R (n m n V N N W M N W N M f� N CD Q (0 M 0 H 0) N co CD m 0) M CD m N N co V V� r O co m M m M m N co W N m N d' co 7 (n m V 7 V (n V m M V V (o V N V O O V M N N M r f� (f) (o m m O O N co r W co m (f) co O r O (n V V N O N M tl- V N M V o M In In m In M (D LO r- r CO co W V N N r-- 7 m co C7 W L M co V N M V co r N W W O O CD W N M (D O V J r M co N V M M M LO n f� v m v v r T W r LO m (n m M W m m m M O O O co (D W V N r (D F M O F (D m N m r t- V-1 O (n V V V M W N C' W m M N 0 V W N r- V Cn O (n r- O V (o M V P W V N V N V V W M V Cl) M N N (D r M (n W V co CD ?� W 0 N N r m m M N O O V .- t- N V CO h- W m V h 'T M m O V f� CO •- N O co O t-- V V O (o (o (o to m (n to CO O I� M W to M W N m N O m N 0 N U m W r M Q 7 Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q F m O p 0 Z O N O M O V O M O W F- O O W m O O 0 r M O r N N N M V N N O O = W N E -19 O Y l0 d r- m d M V M Lo = M F C0 00 U Cl) Y N LL O Q N 0 ILL F F a n v 7 C � N � Vl � r V V Q LL 7 N r Q n _ m p O 11 Ci(r 'ru4 ~� O M � W N LL N O C4, F d A � Vl � r V V m LL H m LL M N LL V W m UO l V M 00 M N M M O r ]0 Q D L V � m LL N t- LL M N CD A N cD F(n m UO F M V D r > M WO L Cif m 0 d CO _0 r O D R LL a r O b � M V V m LL N t- LL M N CD Jj FNV �o N cD F(n m UO OM V A D M r LL M O U' Y I�INIMI�I�I�IrIwlMl�l�l�l ��I �lr- �I. -I.-I wI ��I NINININ N E -20 G Y (0 d co v a � 0 0 = o �IM ol° a (n m W V 7 0 (D m N CD (n 0 (D N M w (D v m r M M m m 00 (n ~ J N N N't (n V t` M O In M N m m M m N <t 7 0 N It m m r' m m co co co m m m co rl- L i (O M N V F M 0 F f� N lfn CO N 1- W N t- O M V V M W (n r O O 00 W N O m t` V V to M V V N O 7 V t.. V V V '7 V M t` N r N N LO (D m O T j O > N d m N V N _ O co M (n m N a N N (D M M _ Cl N OJ V O f` m- M N N t` .� t� V (D m In N V d m Ili In v v v v v (n (n 7 ('M N M W (D ,p W C N V M I- N M M m (D M M m M M M M (D J V M N (n r 0 CD CD O N (D M O O T a0 In (O f- e2 M to CD Q Ln m M M V V N M M O N 0 (D M M N � V r O F M M N N W N CO r r (M m n N In N 1� (D tl- M O M 1- N O Ln r (n M M V M N M C (n r W m ti m O O M t- co (D (n m N N (D (D co t- In co (fl (o In m (n M V 06 WCD CD N N Ln 't N co N Cl m (D N r N � co m N V M O Cl N e- �- M m- N 1- S O O m N (D tl- M M co M M In (D (D (D (D (n In N W In O Cl) OJ V O (D N O 7 m m d W N t M m 0 (n .- (D In CD m (D (n O N N V (D m W V J r co N N N N (D N r V M M m co M 'Q r r m v c' In f� Q M (n m 1- N CO m M 0 co (D V co N (n F- 0 F CO (D co M co O V N (n O N O ('M co (D m O7 m V (D O In co V) m M W (D N r M N V ct t` t7 V N V V M (" ) N N Cl) N V � 00 (D Cl) M Qi (D m � N N t (D r '- M N M N 1` O m O O N co V M M V M t` O m M M m M �-- co In O r N M Cl co M N V M co N M V r O V In O N (f) (D r V (n (D CO N O N- co M 7 N 3 m d w V In N M N .- (D U-1 In V (n (D Cl O (M 7 (O O co (D (D (D In ,J (D M N CO V (n M 1l- N O (D W In r co N (D h O m d' V M Q M (D r O m t-_ t- t- tl- m co m r Ln M M N (D F 0 r In CO O V M CO O In O O t- V N (D M (n M V N (D N t- CO M c- M co (D V V co M V M V Ln N co V M w m co M M T (O N N I- In V co L6 W O j > N ice.. O V M CO co CO In O r In m � (D V V m M�� m O V m 7 M r- N t` V N (D (n N N t` r N M r (n M M N m V V r m V 0 07 M N N N N N t` � (D r d m W ((' 'O M Q Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q F p= Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 0 m O- 0 N M V In (D t` W m �- 0 N N N N co V N N 0 O W I�INIMI�I�I�IrIwlMl�l�l�l ��I �lr- �I. -I.-I wI ��I NINININ N E -20 G Y (0 d co v a � 0 0 = o �IM ol° a H � d O D N C O T : N N V n U U ` Q (n ~ O M F « U M a co LID W dco ea dlpn O V O Q C w �2 C N LL N H M d O O y N O T m V M � U U ` Q F � ~ LL G F « U co co a co O H W O O V M Q H co O d O L N � � u O T H00 ~UD LL co V _ (D f (n W d 0 ^ F co M N F « U r _ Cl V LL Q LL F c d O T O N M co u Q LL F Q LL ui ~ W O O C1 0 M LL In aD 00 a o N O M O to 09 Q O LL Y m U 0 3 Y E E 2 Y @ c N W U W Lo E -21 M M _o O Y m d N W LL V co 0) C14 O O = O r o U �2 Y QLn LL W p 2 a v v v M co � W W � @jIco o ") O 0 0 0 0 Q V N W ID M f� M t` r L7 co O V (D O O O W (o V co lD O r O J V Q N V W � V Ln W 0) Ln 7 (o M V 7 ID M 0 In co V l!) (D M M r.. M M In V V In V M M N N 7 M N H T M O O O N U F- U Q m a n LL r- O O O W Ln W co O r a1 O W r� I� N M d) W N M M c) (O � Q N m 2 O r' - N V (o M N N V r- N N LO N N N W N N V Cl) M W Co N N W N M Lo L o j y M M o n V N ° N LL N 0 V O co 2 N M W M N V W W V' O (D 41 N W CD O N O Lq F- N M V W N N M <Y W V' 0) (D W W '7 O r-- o N In N d0 � N N N N N N N N N M M M N N N N � W � O N W w U N LL LL ° 0) N a1 W N V co W N Lo V co N (D V M 6) rA M V O r- O O In O Q V cD r M Ln (D (D r- N t` W 00 W M 0 V co M W N .- V LO Q Q N° � O co O O W O D O O O H H W co V 0) O N M O V W N W W (o m .- W LO co u-I co co N M m r N r V N O M co O W V M V M M M N (o M M N lD M M W (O V M ") N r 0) (D Lo V U U a 0 H ° LL p Lo N _ 0) a N M F m W W CJ M 41 2 U W O f� O N 00 D) 0) 7 7 (D W M M f: O LO to (D W W co In V 00 (D t` co V (o M N O ID N (O V N V O m m N N co co M co M M V M �f N N N O � � W N r � Y Y 7 U (D In N N V O r W M M to W V (o N N M V W U J N Q N V lD M r M W V lf) O In V W W V V M N (D W f� W W M 0) h V W M M Lf) N 0) N 'I LL r LL O 0 O a O r p 2 2 co O rn m m d m O F U o a a ° a U Q O W V l2 f� V W (O to co M ID M rl- co O V O O W W M LO 0) N (0 7 (o co N N t` r N N V N N In co N N M M V' M M N LO V co ID V �- m � W O 0 2 W W M I N r O M O M W V W 7 LD O O M `- co W N N N co N N N V N N N V N M (D (D M M 0 (o M N O Co N O M I� N m W V cc O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 J Q H O r O m W o � N O m � m � W a M (7 J Q? Z o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 O O 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 o 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 Q Q) p N M V" W� W 0) O N M 7 Lc') W n W Q) O '- N M V O 0 2 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N E -21 M M _o O Y m d N W LL V co 0) C14 O O = O r o U �2 Y QLn LL W p 2 a v v v M co � W W � @jIco o ") O 0 0 0 0 Q O O O O O F- F- T O O r N N U w U Q m a n LL LL � Q = V 2 O F- (o '� r- r Ln L o O N M M o n ° N LL N V O co O O O O F- H O O N � w U LL LL ° 0) D W O p M V U Q Q N° LL co O co W O D O O O H W O C> O L N � T U U U a H H ° LL p Lo N _ 0) a (D M F m W W CJ M Q= C) U L o co O LL v° O O m m r � Y Y 7 U LL u a a = Y U U ` Y m 3 a � Q LL r LL O 0 O a O r p 2 2 2 rn m m d m O p U o a a ° a U Q O Y a M LL M Q Q Q Lol IrININIP Iu)IcV If�IWIU)I �I�I(�I'- )Irlr)Irlrlrl r)I NININI N N E -22 O Y R 0) O aU') F v U 00 _ GI o LL (D m ¢`� cp a M LO (D N 1` O r- M O (O W W to M OD O N Ln N M N V M O 41 cl J W N W O N (D N M O 00 W N W Ln LO co W 00 O N In rl Ln W (D Q r N D m LL N M O r M .- (D (D M M to Ln V LO fl- 0) O V O 0) 00 In M N F - N - Ln O (`I V M W u) N V N N W N O r m N In O f-- co O (n M a1 r rt f� Ln M Ln f� W N (D r It N n O V N r- 0) f- r Q) f� LO f� N t� (D (D f-- f- 00 O � co O LO c- V (D - M N f� r T 0) M m N O O r N d r (D W r 01 O O (n o N V W 0) W r M r (n O N W 0) N (D f6 m r (D Cl) V W (0) Ln co co Cl) 0) O r � M O 0) O W N N W W � m r M V In u) LO Ln � f� (0 (O Wm N N co (t) (n V M r N N � Z C N co N O r co 00 f� W (0 N W O CO CO CO In O (D O O r O to J V f� LO IO O V R O N O (n r (O In M 00 cD O (f) f� N N co Q r r M 0 W W LO V V W W f� O r V O V O_ CO Ln M '7 F-. r N N N N co 0 N N 0) rl- V M O N tO LO r O O N V CO N N r (O O W N r r (D IO M N M r W N N W M V M r O (n m co f-- O co O O co W 0) W (D 0) W W (D '- V M N M N N r O h 0) m V O CD (n N d O W (n M W N W r (D M W M N N r r Ln O m N O LO co O to f- M r co O W u) O co N D7 cD r cc co (D M 0 0) d) O M m co N Ln I37 In W O W co O N_ (n r W (O (n M r (p M Z N I-- Ln Ln m N O Ln W (D r V Ln V co O V W 00 N (n M [t m r N J O 0) r W O O N W O N O M r 0) M N M f` W CO V LO 0) V Q N r O N M N (D O W (D M F r N N N N r 0) N O H f- Ln Ln W Or-- O W (D (n M (n (D V W r N O a1 4) (D O LO r- M M co ^ N N r f- n N V N 0) a1 r 00 W f� W 0) 1` r W M M m 0 r M 0 0 V 1` r LO T 00 V M r M 0 M m n N O O O N M (n W O N M N O N IO (D r O o V Ln Cl) f� f- M r CD -It M M fl- M O LO CO u) (O Ln N W W co W O W N O 00 V O N N V M N a1 (D co d) � LO t co M co O 7 m V � Z V O In co N M 0) V O 10 f- W W O N Ln N V V Ln Cl r M J O Q r Ln Ln co N M N r (D W M f- O N f-- V N N r M_ O LO O LO W D) O M O M N W M M N c- O V 0) LO N M f- 'ct F O .- N r M N F r CO Q) r V O O O (n co O V r M O V N Ln M Ln M N M tO N N O M co Q) r T (D Ln (D � (D f� r O f� V V W W co r O LO LO W u) M N r co O W m c`7 O y N t W O V O W r f� R W! O M� M O co M� r� V N O r- A Ln M N N N O r N M Ln In <t In In IO r W IO Ln (D W M O W V V m r T V M O d' r O O N W (O N r N M V 7 m N Z 'O Zo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 O 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-12 0 0 O O O O o O o p Q 0 Z o 00000000 O r N M N O O = W N IrININIP Iu)IcV If�IWIU)I �I�I(�I'- )Irlr)Irlrlrl r)I NININI N N E -22 O Y R 0) O aU') F v U 00 _ GI o LL (D m ¢`� cp a H H Gi 0 a O Q D 04 y V LL OLO Q 1�0 Q F LL _ D Q A N O fD N a O L Ci 41 cl O N N LL N N O F H D) O H O r V V : Q N Q N � LL OLO V _ N 0- D Q A N O fD N a O LL H H W O O L O N � � V v U U � U R QW LL N ~ r O r M — h 0: Ln O o ~(D J CIm in 04 LO JJ N 0 . N LL N < O H W O ED O M v U U R Q00 H a P O o V M n LO JJ W N O (D QIO LL N D m LL N M O Y F E V U) O 0 O C m K U N M LO E -23 O Cl) cli O � d CD .'r o d M F U co = o I° to m m Q � Q G ° a O m f` m h V N to V f� M M CD N h - O O LO N M O (O ❑ N N LL J m V 0 CO O O U) M M V m r (D r h N M N M N m V N m N Q r r M m O m r 'tt LO V C' N M I` co M O W I-- O co N O N H m O O co N d 7 Co Z N O r O c0 r LO O (D f� O m N co V "T oo O O O N t` m M_ co co f� r LO r 0 0o O (D (D O r �{ M (D O co r 0 Q r N (D V I� LO O co O) oo m O M co N O w O LO M LO r N N co O N F co I� O O I` N O r (p Il- I- O M(D W r M 0 m LO r N V (D V oo d' N N M CD r V M m W N f� O_ N m r r O LO m I� r co m M m co m V r r M L0 LO r V W co M N r N m O V% 0 N M t2 V M 0 U) r M N N tf) W O I` W m Lo" LO M M m f6 I� N N r r M r r M N L0 N O (D M M co O M V m O W O 1� cl f� r LO N (D LO m co O m co co N r c0 LO co Z fA r 0 tb CD r 0 � N M Ln V co I- m V L0 O L[Y M co r co L0 (O O J tb r M Ln M O N LO co N Il_ co r 0 O N M m O O W V Q r LO r N O m m co co m 0 O_ O CO LO LO V M r o0 H � O N M m V r O N 0 LO M N 0 It M V m M V O CO M CO LO (D N LO N r N M O r V M (D co LO LO m I` O m O LO M Ln LO r- In Ln oo LO r LO m u) Il- LO V Cl) O co LO N of r r r <{ LO m m W O � O N C O N m V M r �T LO r c0 r- r O co V V V LO Lo N N V M M co G O O N N r r N LO co r LO N O co M N m M N M V M M M M M N V m V (D V (D 7 M N m .- L() M I m Cl! 3 co Z LO t O U r O W (D r 0r-- N M LO V oo f� m V LO O LO co (D r co LO Co O J OJ V r M Ln (D O N LO co N Il- co r o (D N M m o o of V Q r u, r N o m m o0 oo O) O O O co LO Ln C m r M O H co m V r O N O LO M N O V co V m co V O M CO CO LO O N Lo N r N M O r z M (D m in p m n m m m LO M LO u) o LO M LO LO l71 N I� LO V co O co LO N O) r r r V LO In o v� m O N N W r Ln r c0 I� O M V 3- V LO t0 N N M W 0 o 0 aD N r r N Ln O r LO N O (O M N m M N M V M M M M M N m T (D V O V M N m r LO M r m N m Lo Z .0 M ❑ Q❑ Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q F m 0 D N M [T LOO tb m O r N M V Ln O n W m O r N M V O O = O W O O O O O O O O r r N N N N N N E -23 O Cl) cli O � d CD .'r o d M F U co = o I° to m m Q � Q G ° a H f` O m v CD c O N N m o v t) Q R Q LL ~ v ~ M C m - LL Lo 5 O (Ln° 0 Lo O ❑ N N LL N N F f` O y O N V V m o v LL F 00 O LL M - LL F M LO co to F W m Qj M OD W m CN Lq N N LL d 0 F f` co O = O N � V 2 m o v N LL F F N LL (D _ F co N (3�2 G� (D F [0 (7 n L V u r L O ❑ v r LL f` m o v O (y N V LL LL Q. CD - c0 a. U) F co N d M h F. LO N O Q O LL ❑ M r LL M Y O CO 0 U O N co D E E Y (6 (6 V 0 O U v M LO Irl` �I°' I�I°' I�I�IWIu 'Irlrl`rl`rI�I�I�I�IrIrININININ N E -24 Y R d 1.00 LO =ti QI r W DId o d M r W W LO M r M (O W W LO 00 W W N I` CO N (O V CO Ln O N u J LO V N V N O O O) m LO r h O 0) N LO Ln �r-- L O O Ln N f: r •- Q r M N (O Ln (O f� W W O O C) r W Ln (O V M r r F M 0 F N O M Ln V M N n O V m V r V W O N r O W W M V N m r N M M (D M M 0) M (D V co V V Ln V LO lf') Ln N 0) (o V O co O co Cl) N (D 0) r M O O Q) O O j O N d r r M CO r 0 0) N Lo _ V Ln _ V Ln O W co N W O (p m N N r N W M M N LO O N p 0 O M Lo Ln W 0, Q) M W (D O r lO Co M r O r N co N N CO V M c} V h Ln CO N M N r N a m a W N Q F 0 F- m M O CD N w 3 f� a W N W co O In W cD co t` M Ln N W M co N co N J Q N N N V (o r LD t Ln r- O V 0) � V O I- N V W N m M m r O O V I- (o L() V Ln (D N r O r r M � N 0 H r 0) r r (D V N r m V (D d) (D M M cD V W r W (o O N O O) N r N m Ln N O S N O V) V O co Ln co N V N V V V V M o0 V M C M W N r r O(D V r N m p Go N M 00 (n 0) LO 0) m O Ln R r r (D LO 'ch 0) O N M N r r N m r (O N r- V co co V co V M 0) M N V Ln V W V W W V Ln O V r N N Ln O r (D a1 O 7 m W a W L LO M (D f� r (D W O Ln W 00 O) O O N O O N LO O N W Co W J (o co N r M r r M cD .- O O W cr r O W 0 LO W W r O r Q r M Co CO (O In r-_ W r r co r h (D V co M F- O 0 F 0) r W W N W Mrl_ 0) N r (o (o V V O M V O (D (D W co O N m r r W W r O 0) W M M Or-- co M N co O V Ln co co co M r co M O M N N r N Ln d' N N 00 CD Lo N N co N W O O co co co N co r- N M N N N I- N N O V V O r- O N V N r .-- M N 0 Ln (D co V d' W N N N O V 7 Ln M co N O N co V r 10 Q) r a W O .2 M 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o L0 N 'D LO (O I� O O O N M V Ln (O n p O r N N N N N Irl` �I°' I�I°' I�I�IWIu 'Irlrl`rl`rI�I�I�I�IrIrININININ N E -24 Y R d 1.00 LO =ti QI r W DId o d F a W o v F O M 7) 'O C OV N 0) V O N O N U F cq = H l0 fV CO ~ 1J a� ON aW u LO ❑ N r LL N O F a W o v F O M a U � 0) Q O N O N U LL F 0 ar , '70 f�0 ~ ar N Q LL ~ ci LL F O O G O H N 00 F W 0 0 M ~ Q t) H r L O ❑ LL r F a W o v H O M a U � O L 0 Q N � � V LL F 0 ar , '70 Q ar N LL LL F Ln ci C � > O _ W co H N 00 F r V M D O (O L r r L O ❑ LL F a W o v O M U � Q � LL F LL co ar , '70 F- ar N L(Dn LLI 0 N ci o V O .� m D M O LL r M O Y LO Cl) L) IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -25 'c Y (0 d (D (D d m r� v � (n m C x Q U. (° m G U QN o° a J (D Lo M m 0 CD f-- cc m oo N V,� M of Lo V r-- V V Ln O) V co m (D M O co V M co Lo h T N r V m m oo V m m m 0 I-- 0 Q r a) Q N r co 0 (D Ln r m m m O N V (D h M m 1l- cn co N cn v O F O O d M N 1 N M° O H (D (D Ln co r N M M O N O m 0 w co N (D M Lo V (D L M (o (n r O V �- M 7 W Lo N N m m M O N M I� I r �� (D W m m r N oo M r r- Lo V 3 V Ln In Lo 10 V co N r O j O N > `m O m m V Lo (D M O m N 0 o7 r (p N N M N N m �o I� N O (0 M In co M N(D V In N M O V of O Cl) V [o V m I� V Ln W r N co co Ln V N r M L C N N m V V r N N (D N r In (D M M r oD O w (D oo of [D T C' m J ¢ M I'- r (o (D r r M (D O O W M (D m 0 r m r,'-, m (o O O r r� N a W 1� O M M (o m (D- r r N O V r N N O O N H Il V O V co I- co m r N M T M (n M N (D m N (o O m O m M M N V oo co N r N N V cD r m M 0) (O M (n V (D (n V M f� (n (o N m (D to r� V m M V N (D N r to �- (n cn cD O O N d) r to r 0 co Lo V O Lo O M M m 0 (D U") of N (!') O O r m M cc m m V co N N to V of N M (D V O f- V M V O m I- V (D M r M r N (D co O (D N (n (n O V M (n r r (n O O 111 N (D O N N V N (n (D W V O I� N of I� N M (o r O N N (D V J ¢ m cD V (o N O r O r M 0 (n (D r f- r m M 0 m n 0 0 M r N Lo M (D m CA (o M m of V I- co (n (o M O r r W H N O N m m m cD Ln M I� M r O O r M r m (n 7 M r m V co Ln co m N r r M m r M (D M O (D 1� N V M f-- (o m Ln I� Lo V (o (n 2 O co cD N Lo N N N N V of r Ln (D O oo m O N O m m of c0 CO V O (D m N M O O N O N(D O N � 'D CD V N .- Cl W M CO m V V O CD m (D M(D M '- m (D M V � m m N M M M V' d' m to (D m cc m N N M co CD to M N r� O W O a V O (D N r (D I� O m V W (o I- O co c> U.) M r m co to r (D O J ¢ r Lo r Co r N V m W I� W O M O O O m W m 0 Co m (V M f O f- O N V m m V co 0 OO (D M m r N t F- O N N F V N M M N I� N N m N O M (D m y (D M M W (D m O r to Lo m N N r N (D N N m N n cn W 7 N M m (D (D Lo (D r V l77 w� (n (n (D CD Ln m V y M (o N (D O r (o M O °0 3 N O oo co m co m (o V I� N oo N r r r N O M co 'T (o O r to � m N N r M V' W N co V OO d' M (D W CD V co M M V co V oo m r M M V Cl) V (o (n (D o7 r m (D Lo V N r (D � 111 O J QZ 7 O O O_ 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O 0(D O O 0 O O cD 0 O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 O 0 O G O x Z N 0 0 M 0 V 0 m (D 0 0 n w 0 0 m 0 0 r N M V o (O I� W m 0 N _O N N M N N V N O O W IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -25 'c Y (0 d (D (D d m r� v � (n m C x Q U. (° m G U QN o° a C' F H c7 Q A N r C N V u n U o LL R M U LL F U oo - a) Q N L Ci M V Ci W LO C W C N LL cD O N C' H H d Q A N V V a � M U V � h U LL F N ~ V LL O N O — OD Lo Ci N m O L a N °O N Co C) W U N cD O Iq N lL r p C' F H b O Q � L V � n V M U � U ¢ LLU. Q LL r_ M L Wit- ON cD d0) L O @ N L N LL N v O C' H Q M v U Q LL r_ M N cD — ~ O N O n o L co D m oD a U O d M N 1 N M° IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII E -26 O Y R d W N d P- _ m O W m Cl) U 00 Y Q LL y a J O V m W N N m f- p r �- O W W N Cn M M M M W O (O N �- I- W V (O m (n m N � f� M N 0 � W O Cl M co I- W r Cn Q N - 3 �_ m m W Cn O (D m r co M (n (D N- N C' N H O - N N (N O co F 0) m O (n N d R m_ a Z N V O W W f� W V O W Cn N co W O (n V 0 Cn Cn O N W co M J W O m r N �'- N V co V V N m (n P- O W N oc N r- Cn N h m M N Cn N .- O co Cl LO (D M Cn N {- O r N N .- N N N N M H O N N CO (D W W O m V N cD O f- r W 1� O r W n M 7 r W m p LO N V O) M M Cn O co t- «) r- N CO W M W W W V m V m W m W m N m In W M O Ln M Cl 0 M N .- 0 O T (p O N N d V W O O O 'D W M M r t` O W m M m V In m O V M M M W co M M m (O m C' OT M to to to W (D m W CO I� W (n N Lf� O a0 m to W W co I- m W CO M Cn N d* N = (n Z N N N W .- to O M CD Ln W W co co N O O 00 m M co O co 00 J Q! (D W CO W N M V V V d' I- CO O Lo (0 (0 Cn N O m O V 00 (D (D N V N m W N 00 I� V M M m m N N N N N W O N F O O CO N M O M m p m N (n V co co M V M V W W O m CD V co V 6) V N m M V m M m co Il- O � M N O m O m In 00 m Il- N V m N i� N r' N •- V m m V O O fn O N N N O M N V N M CO O N 7 00 m m I� r` V CO N m 0 f� m mN O co M M W N M V (n M (D W � W m m fl- N m � V � m M LO Ln Cn Ln O O (fl m O V W V W (n Cn M N O Ui Z V V W W M co N O m 0 W O M m O N f� tO (O I-- (O N d' J R co co I� O O Cn CO m m m (n m M u) (D N M N V c0 (n N i- cn N 1- W (D m - V (D O N O M W V M V O F O N - N N '- 00 H O f- W M V d' N W m I� V �'- f� O m m N W M V �- N 1l- O W <t co d' I- M m O (D co (D V 00 O V W O O O� r r• (n W co W fl- O r- M Cn r� M m N N m N co m O O N O O N W W m (D N O N O M co W co co Cn m Cn V W V M co M co (n O In O V m (D (n W co In I� m co co V N m co W m in A U) (D I� W m M h N 00 CO co M N m Z c M C7 J Q� 2 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q m p= p Z `- N 0 0 ' cm 0 (n W 0 0 r 0 W m 0 0 O N M V m W n W m O N N N M N N V~ N O W IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII E -26 O Y R d W N d P- _ m O W m Cl) U 00 Y Q LL y a F H U O U @ 3, a O � N Q O V U a LL R U F- > LL LL H F-- co > n Q JJ U' `� O 0 a'o u ° a D N N LL N N F H U O U @ O m Q N U � � U V Q (� Q LL H F-- co > LL L Cn co J= N O W Q O O O U a0 N W N O N LL M M° F W U' O t O � U O U @ U Q � Q LL F LL V N Il� M N Lij 0 2 CN W W m Q t N C V LL J= N O F W a O M O U O U @ N Q W LL LL X .- = _u ~o r Q' N ~m COn U° Q a 'D u LL ° M N LL M M° Y E -27 Y 16 d M m d cm qq� rn =n VIO al In N M r Q CD d O N O m O N r N M m (D M In O 7 w N m V m In m Ln (D LL J M r M V w Ln N V CD V V V (D v m v o2 (D M t` V M W f- N a N V f� W O N N O N O v O m� V N N N N N N N co O N r (D co cy Ln O O N m v v v in co M O (D N V 'V O (D V M N N Ln f� M In O Ln N �_ O m O m O N � (D m N (D M OO m r O V 117 V M d' r N M c0 I- T O O m M N d M co co M (D r O N— N f- M N M N M M co r-- .- Ln Lo O m w M Lo N f� m M N L(') M M M M N (D N N m m OO O m W V (D h W 0 r' c- M M N w (D Ln V co !n N Ln N co M oO w r c- m V N m m m w M M O r O O o m J a (D v t m (D N Ln Ln N� w M O N M Ln m Ln M .- �- 7 N m"t N N M w co O c0 m M m O O m (D V 0 co l r .- N N N N M M M M m N N co O co r O M Ln M '7 V V M O V d' Ln Ln V co M f� f- Ln Ln m f� co m M V N e- N Lo O N m O co N O N C : N V (D M Ln (D (D cM Ln N V M CO w �_ m V' Y' Ln M co W N N m N M � m O N .d, Ln m M (D V r V W Lo O Il- V Lo O N (D N Ln co M N r O I� M M N V Ln m v Ln w (D CD w N V M N V Ln m � f` (D M M m V m (D O M V OO (D (D V Ln r N 7 m m Ci W N m m M N V o2 w O m N m co Lo M cc m �- W V (D m Ln J M f` m Lo (D N m O M M m (D co t` M N M Lo O m a N m O O V (D Ln (D W (D M M co Lo M N r N N N N N N N N N N co O co r a N N N cO O M O O r M O V M CD V O M (D V M O N Lo N N V O N m 0 (D N Ln M N N r N N m m N N N O n 0 GOO 000 N N V M Lo c0 N O� LD m (p oo O cD N d Y Ln V (D m O N N N m rn to m N N M Ln Lo m M M m V u7 N (D _N N Ln O f� W N N m N M N V N O 47 Ln m O v m � O r to W l!') M O N r w O W L CD M Ln N M O (o Ln M N (D N N (D (D Ln Ln J m m M c co N M N co N D M m V n N V O r W m m V N r N Ln Q N w V N CD t` M O O M M m r Ln <F N N r .-- N N N N N O N r CDMn M O in co ONt`N D 4M O OLn m N Ln Lnr Ln N e- M OO co M (D O r' N O r m m �'- m O m f� N w c0 (D '- r O N m V N m Lo fl- co M m (2 co O N N O C zT r M M CO N Ln (D W O (D N r- Ln V O r- O Ln r V CD v (D (D m (D r M N CD h w co (D co N f` r- M m w M D Z a 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O r Q O p= Z N 0 0 M V 0 0 Ln O 0 0 f- c0 0 0 M O 0 N M V Ln (D n W M O N N N M N N V N O N W E -27 Y 16 d M m d cm qq� rn =n VIO al In N M r Q CD d r w a r r 0 T D Q O C O N O N � 0 N U m b v :O LL R LL LL r LL r M N N Q Lo _ M O N J O M a N O p m W O co N N O N LL N r w a H r O m Q O _N O O N � 0 N u m M v N Q LL r LL r M N N r- _ (D V r 0 (0 M r M U') CJ ) o tc) (� O Q H((On Q LL M N r w a r O t Q O N � 0 LL m U C) Q Q co °m r(D rco N p LL Dao �(D _LD M aT �O (0W w Cif �C) Fr a(D 0 �(o LL" �o r w a O T ID N M O u M U Q LL r r LL m _ C) Ln 00 Jj cy� Cl) co °m N N p aC) M LL M Y F F (n `o 0 O CON m CO r Ln E -28 Y m m M In a m O �o Q o m ¢I of a H O M 0 m � O C V' I M m m m m V V Q J M I� In M O (O M N IO O V f� N M W CO W to I� In M V r r OJ m m O m M M m f— V lf) W N W If) Cn In M N LL F N N N N N N N N N N N e- n F m m o N r m d Co Z N O N cO N (O o7 W LO CO V I` V O V N IO O c0 I� f` W V OO J V Q I— n M M W 7 N r` O (n m N In 7 7 I-- M O In co m m In I-- O I` N t Ln O M N V CO r' N In O r I� co M Uf F N N N M N N M M m M N 6i O H M N O I� O N 7 CO M (O i� V to N f` N O O O M O N (O (O I-- V co V (O m e- CO (O O O O N M : I-- In V V '- (n (n m In F O V '- LO ID CO (O M (O (O V' O N f� m _ m O N N I� V co In co (O V I,- O co O O (n O N I` V O (O co N co N N H' N m M I- W M (n CD In m In LO N Il (O (n N I� M (` m O M M m r W m M m O N (O <h m V O z N O co m CO Cl) m co V Il- N M In � m V N V In I� M T O O J (n Q C M M m N N N m OO In (O I-- r m O M m N CO LO M O M to OO M N (n M (O O F O O m 00 O CD N d c O m co O O3 Z a m O N c0 co m M r- m co N O V M O m il- N CO (D In O In J (O V V co m m 1� tM O co N l!') v m d' In (O (O M V (O M V e� N to (O I� O t` co V N V (O e- I� O H I� m Ln Ln CO M W In � co co N IO '- (0 .-- () I- M M V' co N IO M N N V W IO O. M O O_ W m V m r O co W O f` M V (O M t� M W M lM (fl 7 N t V I� v N m m M O N O � N tV V M O I— O O m M N m W I— m M I-- W V O N IO N m W O m N N N M co M I— m V V (O V M m 1� h m 0 In (O (n O M (n (O M m m N LO I— r r co M m m 0 � 0 (O M N N O Z N M (7 J a 7= O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q m gm O 0 Z 0 N M 0 0 t n 0 0 O 0 0 N m 0 0 0 N M V IO co I- W m — 0 N N N M N N V~ N O O w E -28 Y m m M In a m O �o Q o m ¢I of a F- Ci 0 O H O M 0 m � O C v m M LL F (D ~ O N U m b U a Q m Q F LL LL co m LL � Q l — M LL Li O O r- � N N O In 0 OoLp Ci In m Co o N LL N F- Ci 0 O F O M m C1 O O N N v m M LL F (D ~ O U m U U N Q m Q H r ~ LL S M LL co m LL � r M m M F m Li O O r- � N N O In Q M co O N Q LL In F- Ci 0 O F O M 00 Ci O t O N � v m M LL F (D ~ co U m N U U Q m Q LL LL H F m n F O ai Ci O M O In N N O O LL a F- Ci 0 O O M N U v m M LL F (D ~ Q LL (p 0 In m LLr O _ ►- ON Q co U M N LL V 00 HOO CY � LQ N M O UM Uo LLI O Y V N n LO � N N N CN N N E -29 'o x m _ d LO CL LO � v o r(O ()00 YN �I LO LI O LO L Cl) 0 o a O LO I- LO m N LO LO V(D 7 N V Q�1 (D M LO O M M LO :- N 00 I- N N J Q Il- N 7 m O0 N LO 00 00 m LO O LO V W O I- N m M N N O m V V co M 0 tO I� LO M LO V O co V co V co r- V O r N '- N N N N N N N N clj O °' O r N V N co V N V I-- m 0 I- Lo O (D '; co 00 O) co N co (D I� (O M Lo M M M M O N O- M m co (D - m N O O I� -- m O V N M M LO V N 0 3 N d r 00 N Ln (p V I) Ln M _ N O O m N O O O W m LO _ m _ N � V M N O � m V N (fl N r N co t\ o) r- � co O co O V N N M e- V� 00 N N m Il- I� 00 00 O (O M M C O O N O co O CO W n D N J O N m- m co 0 M LO CD V Il- W m (D O. (D V O M N LO M O LO m Ln 1- N 00 I-- m of co m N m � N V LO co LO M m to N Q '- V N N V I- N tO V LO (D of m (D O r O M co V N H N N N M M M M M M M M M N oo O r LO M V O m LO 00 LO r Ln m N 0 I- M O N m co of (` N m V M V O M V N co R N- LO In (D (m O m f� (D of M m M 00 m Il W W t- LO O O Il_ 0) LO M O N LO I- N 00 o O O _ V N N m N I- m 0 W LO O 0] (D N LO O V co O O LO 00 M (D LO M V M N LO V O m co co O M O (D V (D (D co LO (D co m M I� m y m v v o m I-- Lo r N O 7 7 a m N co W N LO O co O (D N O O co O tO CD m I� co O O o0 V W O 7 J Q m (` M I� M O N W m m m CD N m O N N O •- N N (D V 1� (O N O M N n H N N N N N m O N co co LO v v m v m Ln (` M m LO n m 'D 't m N N N LO (D (D N V M N N I-- LO N co Lo n N N O M m Il- m N m CD m n O m O O O t` m In (D I� O CO N N N O M CD N m co O N r DD M co M f` W I� M �-- 1� O N N f` 7 00 w M co N O O LO V M N L() OO m m <t M (D V - (D L1] O L!] L) r r OJ Lf7 7 (Q V CD I� O f` m m O N V R m co O M V, W Ln C (D (D f� co N V N LO LO m M Ltd O N� V (D O O O LO LO (` m m J Q 00 (l- Lo � m (D Co � O I� M N Il- O (` O r N m O N LO M N Q1 LO 00 LO CO N m (D m LO N N LO F- O N N N N N N N N N N N V M H N LO V m M o) ti m LO (D N N O 00 N I- N t- t-- O 00 m O N N (D N N N Ln T CO N t` m - N CD M m 0101-It 0 0 0 CO m 0 0 N O of O m N cc V m (D V m N 00 00 LO L m n W O N d v M m m (D LO O O co co O V O f` t` W N LO M V M t` In r (` M O 00 I� M W 00 N m W r m r- M co o) N LO t` m N m N co co N m (J W O D M Q Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q r p= Z 0 N 0 M 0 It LO 0 0 (D f- 0 0 O 0 m 0 0 N M V LO (D I� O m 0 N N N N M V N N 0 a W � N N N CN N N E -29 'o x m _ d LO CL LO � v o r(O ()00 YN �I LO LI O LO L Cl) 0 o a r r a a r D 7 C D V V U 7 N (p Q�1 V 0 D Q �m Q LL R r r JJ �N GO 0 V O W (O co N r L a n O N V) r LO o D Cl) V N D 7 N LL M N r r a 0 a D V V U Q (p Q�1 v FLL -0) r00 �m 0: r - r N Q W JJ �N GO 0 V aV C O Q y V LL M O r p a r O L 0 a U M: Q LL r(p '> LL o00 0: r - r N Q W _u LOO 0O MO Lo a0 Q L O N L O Q' V a L6 r 0 a O D O � (D U U E Q0) a LL r_ Q' V a L6 N LO r LOO o N U A O D LL IO M M LL L`7 O Y 'O 0 O m co 0 OD af U) O 0 O C m U M LO E -30 M m p ofl- 0o v a N r Ln U (D ac N QI r cl o a r CY n (0 r O m N VP O U : m (0 LO LL J N (0 N M LO M M W O M M M LO 0 n O Lo W N LL a co ii O o 0 N N LO O m co N n 7 9 (D M 0 O V O LO W A Y CO CO N N N N N CO CO CO M N N 00 ON r O m LO N LO r M 7 m y 0 r- O 7 r` r O Cl) : O O M r- -It m f` m m co h V r N r` V N O M W t` V V M N m (M N M t` <r V' N N LO r- n m N O) m ih W (D CO CO V' N M O r N r co o fn N N d N r O 7 N N f� N V O) O O I� N N LO eT O O c0 O (o a1 (p LO (D O t0 M t� LO LO N r- (O N W CO (0 00 O I� N N 00 M N O m � M m V• 7 M V (0 Ln V: r` C O O (fl CO r LO M N CJ r Z C N m r` r• n m LO r-- LO (0 V co loo 7 r- O O M O J LO V' M m V f` M m M O r- N LO N LO (D OD m Cl) N 7 co LO W a M N �'- N r` m M N 0 C 0 O M m n t` W N m m O O O r (M M M Cl) CO M M (M Cl) M M N N— LO r VN LO m CD mn Lo LO t` V mmN to CD(D N co V O ON m m N co O LO e- N m V 00 (o O m N (O tO m LO LO O O LO (0 L() V' (D (0 V O n V M Cl) �_ CO m r- M V LO co (D t-- O O H r N r LL') N 0 N L d O W W O N m O N M M N r` N M O CO lO N N f` O m LO m mtnm V M CO V N N M mow V V M LO V'r`ONV LO r� C LOONLOa 0 V O r` LO M m N � N N O O N co m O co m O a I-. N O V O W O M Lf7 M N (fl O J a m O 00 N m V M LD M m h 0 co LO O W W V (0 n N a N CO O) O CO M N N V O O N N n M O CO V (fl N N N N N N N N M M N M OCO r N O r- W (D O OO(0 M CD C, mOm co NOMO r Ln N r V 0 m n V CO C\! O N m V M a �-O N 0 aD V N'R M p �-mO h p V LO N N MN m M co N _ _ _ N O (n N O M co 0 m (0 M LO M V N O O N m N m N f� LO LO LO m r V' V co � V N n co M O O N R m m M M 0 �_ M O N co N O O co d' m O e- p m r` to V O M N N m � Z L V co m V 0 V' N N 0 co m LO Lo Ln M LO M (O 00 CO O m r V M JmLOOOOLDO V ��n07NO ,"P tO CO m N 0 a N N (D O n O O N N N M O W O O LO N m r Ln dD N N N. N N N N N ON r OMOm W M W f`N h aOmMmCD N(D V LO 04 N O (Dm LO MO .-MN r` co N W O LO co 00 mN CON 0�_O T mOmO .-N COI- LOO co Ln a a N O �- O m fn N t co (D V O m n O r DD M CD N O m N a N V a LO M M M 0 0 0 m W co N V m 0 0 �- a 7 N O (0 LO (D O) N h a m t` LO CO V CO co M N V CO m N t` m O m 0 M J a M Z 7 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O o O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 o 0 p o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 O O Q r m C) O G Z N p 0 M 7 0 0 LO 0 (0 I- 0 0 W m 0 0 O N M V lO W m O N N N N M N N O N liJ E -30 M m p ofl- 0o v a N r Ln U (D ac N QI r cl o a r c� 17 'p r CY n J N V V U : Q Y) LL 7 Lay r LL Q, LO —_ CO LO r00 Ecru r0)) u LO M LO .0 n LL O N LL N r c� 17 'p r CY A � r V U U : Q Y) N Q co fh r LO M QO LL r LL Q, LO —_ co N r W (0 LO lJ CiN OLo �(D v N � * CD N O LL O r c� 17 'p r b � D t V V O U Lay r U LL a S — r m L (fin G N Q co fh r LO M QO Q L co (0't J LL L p r c� 17 'p D M V V p Q Q LL r LL r CO LO co U.) _ O Q• N r� m ii O o 0 c UI o V 'C � 9 (D M p 0 Lay '] C', LL A Y IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII E -31 'o Y d a N V V a � r °v U = M N AI QI p O Q N o p 0- 9 7 9 � O V W In m (D V O O N (O M O I- (0 M M co O V' O m m V J (D Q m h (O m m. N r N W M M O W N N co (D V m W N (0 I� r N m m m W (D I� m V N m M N 0 D D Z F- 0 N Z) v r V N F- r 't r N V W L m 10 O O r Q N NO y 7 I� 0) m m v W O V O co m O m Il- N I` M m (D I� m I- co d' O W In M Cl) Cl) M O (D O W r- W LO co � m t` W W co m m W V CO V V co M IO N LO (D o CD ? F O l a o 10 In o� r N v In m N O a LL a O N > � r 0 ]O � y M d u LL r (D r W LL G r O ar V r0) - N @o ar O m In m O JJ � O � W cy � tOn Q O M M m IO O V co O m N IO M m O m O co M _ In 00 @ m I� 7 M N N (D (D O O m m In V ' Io (0 m f- m M W It Ln m V V W = (f m m � M W W LO In W r c.0 (D I� r m IO V m V M (D O r W C N <{ M N CD (D M O t� O O O co V 00 In V (D .- f� W V J 'a W In LO W � O O co M co O M O O M In h �-' I- V m N I� I` Q M co V V N M V V M IO (D (O (0 M m I� W V N m O r i� O M co (D LO co co LO O I� t` O co I- N L m co co N In I� W V f� LO N M co V N Il- V I� N W O M (D (D O In I- M V ID I-_ In M I` I` r (D (D (D V V N M M O (O N N W o CD m O CD N N f` M m O O W N M N O m O N m N W m N W V (D O O O 7 (D m M N N IO W I-- M [D N (D (D M 2 (D f- m W (D (D (D m W W co W In 0) In O (D LO O (D V M N t7 N IO Q W N O co I` m O V W N M In In N M m N I� In J co lO I� W W V m M O N m V r m N M (n N O N '7 (O (D N O W (n 7 N 0 O N r CO co W Il- (n N N V V m V (D .- M N t N (D O I- W co LO (n I� W In W O M N M V m V V N IO V co m co In LO co In (D w r (D In V M N N p co O CD N i (D (") V Q> m In W W .-- (") N (D W m M I� M N j V M N N m V N V (O r If) m (D m (n (D W m In M N II) (D Il- W 1� ti W w O O M In co I� M N N N- M W O m m W (D co r Lo N V M co M (0 W W m N M W W J (n Q m I-- W �- N (i') M W to M M W m O m M In In O A N W 0 N N In O � r- W- N (D to (D W - N M r m O r co (D co m V M N O O CO 0 In (D In m N � m m N V V 0 W m IO co M IO I� N V O W W I� N O In In W IO m to O (D (fl to m O to (` m V V In V m co M N M I� N M I'- c o � m N m m co V co d' V O I� O W m M W V N M m m In W m W Io cu O M M N (D V O IO m (D m h m M W (D IO M I0 N co 7 m V (n In IO V (n(n In (D (D 1 mIn M co NN� IO Ci W m M LL (7 J Q Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 Q r m p= O O Z N 0 0 M V 0 0 IO (D 0 0 CO 0 m O- 0 0 N M V (O (D I� CO m 0 N N N N M V N N 0 N W IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII E -31 'o Y d a N V V a � r °v U = M N AI QI p O Q N o p 0- 9 7 9 � H 0 T � � 9 C N V V G LL a LL r W r _ L CiM -_ 00 (a m G� F- r V C'J'0 O N V O O O N D LL N D D Z F- 0 N Z) v r V D U U LL r 't r N V W L m 10 O O r Q N NO y 7 U N lL O X1 ,0 C7 V � b j Q V Q LL r .0 r a LL D m M �_ V ar Cn0 F O l a o 10 In o� r N v In m N O a LL a T b � r 0 ]O � y M v u LL r (D r W LL G r O ar V r0) - N @o ar O m In m O JJ � O � W cy � tOn Q O M LL N M O U. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -32 0 D) o0 o � d a) o) 4 M u. �I � QI A Q N a 0 LL C, O co O m O � 0 0 0 0 Q n M M n (D V N M V N V n-It O N O m n (D n to O 0) J MMmW (nn (ON OM W W Onto N n On m0 to m0 V Q N.- r MOO N n u0n ccO ODN OO(f"i Om n (n M to a� N O r O m N N N N LL N N O r(n LL Ov O N to N O 00 r C14 co O O co a N 1 W u7 u0 O m W O N r' N m (o O n m M M M (O n v v .- cO C V m O m N tD V M N M n N O N to 00 m m m n n M O LO n O M (D N V 7 C to 0 m V N O O Of m W O (m0 O O O M O x r N U mMM U ADO N (nN V MtoNtD 0MnM (DN OO C 0 N m 7M V (D Orn v n O(oO n 00 n M* mm n n 00 wOO 0 C 0)m O NNMM to cc Lo N� O00 7 V Z ~ n co t0 N N LL N 0 0 O O N (O M N O N O m O T O to n 00 m to M V M V M M M J Q N m V V 0 n M 00 N (O 00 N fD �_ OD O R O Cl! N m N O n O M N M O M N.0 n (D to N m M O F- c c x `o '- N— N N N V OV O x LL N d N U r Q 3 u LL M N x x a x m Cl! O (n u7 n O M O O V m (o n n W (D n M (D n n M (D W n M to N n c0 (D [F [O CD M N M n m o N a a a 00 U(D .00 .416 O N A M Y a a Q Q N C M O d' V V N O O M V co N M m n N w m m n (D (D O m to N M N (D N (O n O M O n M N to N O O m m .- N tf) O N V N 7 (n M '- tD n (o Co C d Z N to (n n m CO M M O �- n .- O N V O t- O m N if) V O m J V Q N N N Cl M m N O O m m (n N to V fD n m O 0 00 M O 0 V (D O (D O n O (D O T 0 V O N N F- N N N( CD N O r n a0 v m to O V 7 O N O N 00 OJ n v v tD M n N n n n M N N 7 M (D V O (n 00 co m (D fD N V (D (D N tD (D (D (O O O n O M (0 (D W V M N N W N O V N co m O O co r v n m m V N (o t M O W n CO m N n (D V m O M a O n t m M N m a N t0 to O M tD N M t O n (n N O M m .- V n m m m 0 0 m N V a M 0 O V M N 00 � Q Z L a J M Q N O O O m O M V n (n V M N n m n M M m m W O N m 01 W M 7 M (n N M M O N M N N N N — C14 O F- M 00 m (D (n n N M M cO M M O N (D M V O N m (O M N to m M M O a0 N V m O m O m m O m m to m O n M m W to m O to N M V M N eF N '- OD y CO O N O O n (D [C M M n O M O m M N N to co to n (n M n M V M to O [O N(omm .- n M CD O 000 M OmO� n 00 P M V O v Mm m N OLo 0 V M O m Nm 7 � m•- Z � V M �af7 J 2 Q 0 0 O_ 0 0 O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 00000 O O O O Q r 0 p x N M V In O n O m O N M u0 O n W m 0 N N N N M 7 N N Z O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � 0 N IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -32 0 D) o0 o � d a) o) 4 M u. �I � QI A Q N a 0 LL C, O co O m O � 0 0 0 0 Q M O O O O O r 0) D C N V G1 b V U r C o v — o a m r n @ O r It a� N O � v m N N LL N N O r(n LL Ov O N O 00 C, C14 co O O r 0) V U v � U rn r(n LL Ov C, C14 co co a N 1 D Q N D O lL cn W O (m0 O O O x r U U r O r N O n N W W 1 r co M O ~ n co t0 a N LL N 0 0 O O O O O K p p m r c c x `o OV M x LL N d U Q 3 u LL r c� x x a x m Cl! _ n O (n Y Y cc Y C) d O d G d JJ a a a 00 U(D .00 .416 A M Y a a Q Q m 0 U 0) U M O O 111111111111111111111Ii E -33 iz u7 W M M 00 ;- M O O m M V m m^^ tD Lp w O W^ LP J Ln co O (D m f� N O M LD O M �_ M N N V 10 N M LL'! V LD V N 7 O V W Ln V N LD V M N N of LL r � O am Krn co ' - to OD r0 ^ O ^ m o u. o a \I ^ Q°r° O O r O O o 4t � r rn N a u o O M N M V m m m O r M O O LO V .- O O O M f� LL') N L() N M O m O In m M ^ V 0 N O 0 V O m a M O m. O (D O LO O O (D LD N N N N LO m O N O S O b 0 Y Y N 1 0 L D a a = Y R Y to y o Q 7 LL r r^ LL 0 2 S a 0 2 R V N O O m N m M (D m O V m V M N N M of In M^ Ln ^ m N` W N M N 7 M 0 N r M V Ln 0 V LO 1!7 O N O O (D (fJ CO r O O r to O M m M M N Ifs N N ^^ � �^ � N 3 E N Z N Ll) m M M m V N m m M D) M O N O Lf) 7 L17 O V (D m J (O a ^ (D N O M N LD ^ N V O (D Ln V ^ r f� ^ r- (O O O O_ M O O V^ O^ M N to V CO M O F- O — N N N O N r W M co (D dt N r M M LD v M m co [t LD (0 O M O r N �- R M m V M N N V ^ M ^^ m 0 M m N mm O O) (D O m m I f� m r M W LD m V d' In N ^ N r- N OM (A n N r (O to f� N N LD O (D O f� O O t` a M m O^ f� 7 0 LO Y r m M N N to N m N O t[) LD (D (D O ^ co T M co co O O co O O m LO M O O N In M M In M IN V O 7 N Z N J a r O r m I o to O N d U d a Z m 0 O a U N J a (D V M m M of LD O (O CO O m m R m m ^ V OJ m O] O m 0 (D 0 0 ro m O 7 O M V M O^ N .- r O N N W N M( M W Ln C O O O^ O M N M M N V W V M r- N O m M O m m W m N (D O M N O LD N (D LD LO V T N N ^^ LO O O M m N N N I� ^ (D 0 m y m N d ^^ O <{ M^ M m V (D 7 0 'd' co co M m m m m O 7 O O (h .- M N (D ^ O^ N N O N N O M M 7^ M M V N V V M^ V M tD N 1� m 0 In d m i LO 'o c Ly V C7 J S Z Q 7 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 000 O O O O 0000 O O O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O a 0 0 Fa O= N M 7 Lt) (O ^ O m O - N M V LD (O ^ O m 0 N N N M V N N Z O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 — N N 111111111111111111111Ii E -33 iz 0 0 N N O O F- � r r O Y A V U ^ LO N 1 ED n LL R LL � O am Krn co ' - to OD r0 ^ O ^ m o u. o a \I ^ Q°r° O O � b O O o 4t � r rn N a u o O m O co 0 O O O O O a � LL o a O r O O 0 0 V O O F- � r r r C 7 N V U 0 U n LL R LL ,N am Krn co ' - to OD r0 1 N D O ^ m N li N ° \I ^ A O O � b O O � S 4t � r r a E 7 O V D D) a n O LL O N O r O O L 0 D Q N LO N O LL r t a U a A a H o r LL o 0 D 4t O LL a O O c n O � O r O O S O b 0 Y Y 0 L D a a = Y R Y to Q Q 7 LL r r^ LL 0 2 S a 0 2 R L17 Y Y � Y 1J t— D m ~ V o d d IL d W L^Nn n o a a a a Li M° Y d 0. ¢ Q 111111111111111111110 E -34 D Y 07 d LO (D a n (D n �I� Q LL o Im N v a O IA (D m (0 0 d' U7 00 u7 0 M (M � n CO U) M (D (D N (D (n cM LL J n O n n O (D M M n V' M V M M o M N N n M (D O N O m N LL Q V.-Na V OmOOm00 OMOn V V N N N N N Cl) M N M M M N Cl r OO ODMMn P m N 00 (7) (D NN Of m n LO M co U) L V M M mMO N (f') et M N M m n (n 0W V M— n W 0 3 0 N O N d W m o W co n m N n n 0 V M V V n m _ M (p O V 7M(nM C) NN V 0mmh(n O 00 co 0) N M () n 00 m r- 7 a m 7(D h n N 00 n to V 04 (q W C N (n O V M (D M o n W O O P- m co aD N (1 O JQMN 0) r- 04 0000nn M C' 10 0m(n(n N V NNn W LO Om Co WmNMmam�nm r N N N M M M (M m M M M N N 0 i0 r (DMnn (nmmmM(nM V o V M co O m N O m in V n n (D 0 O o _NNmCDmNnO'n N O m CO (D CO h CO co (D n co d' N O n O N (n CO M O N n m — N N N— N N mNMnN � a m M m OD(0 (n n m 0 W MV wcoN co V V co (n M (D M r-- ( D CO n N O o N O O i n (D O D N h m N m O- M n N M V 0 0 M N LO n m to 't M N — N N N N — N W N co (0 nn Omn(n �_V NnoOOanM(Dnv n J0Nm00�00MON NOn w NN0w NLnn O V cO mN V net V n DD nOnM�_n vv r ON Nm00MMU7m0N N (n CO co m (n m� n Omm 00 V M cn m N MO(n(D O(n M m in M m0 n n M w n n 0 OJ(D(n(fl m oM �- m Om 00V M N V C N m (h O N O N N V n n(D N N (n N CD to Nct(n0 V NC' (n co I co n N �- M M m V (D V V' 00 n m m n O M N N (n N O CO n to n V m (D N r N n O M N V M V m m (n (O V (n O n h N M m m �t M ap J co co co co co M O N V CO n O N O (O O O (n m a N O Q� �MCC,;- M" V lnnOmmN�NN(DV m co Mm N N N N M N N (M M M N CD r co W M 00 n N 00 N 7 N m m V N n 07 M V N O (n O (n n N M M W W N 00 m 00V M OMM M 0 0 n (n 't 0 (D V V in 0) NNm(D(n N O m w -,t M N�-00 � m m co O N mmnn(nNM OnOm Ln OMMO mmnmmMM 0(nv7�on .- 0(0 (D m(D (fi m(n (17n aO W W CO NmdDOMN m n m n O m— MM�--� NM V W N a ? O O o 0 0 CCD (D (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 O O O F 60� O= Z NMV o 0 0 0 (n(D 0 0 n 00 0 0 (3) 0 V in 0n CO m0 _O N N NMV N N N 0 o yJ N 111111111111111111110 E -34 D Y 07 d LO (D a n (D n �I� Q LL o Im N v a r b r .1=I M Ci P O U Q D C � N LL rN rn V d (D )o o D Q A LL H LL F M M Q D — O Q M H M W M r L Cis O Uf N M V O LL O N LL N r b r .1=I M Ci n U Q � N � r LL rN rn V D (D FE o h Q LL rN LL rco n - On CO � r c m o r m L Ci 0 D m o c0 N O Uf N T LL V O r b r .1=I M a t U Q d LL rN rn V (D FE o Q R Q ro U- Q 'O 0) M � (n > R' N ro m(o rm Q « v v m O LL r b .1=I M :o u U � T Q 10 U Q LL rN rn LL ON (D �m _m o in r� Go ro Uo Q 'O 0) M V A m p LL O QI � M LL M Y 0 (L r O ID IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� E -35 G Y LO d v m a CO O = N r co U m ¢I(" U. a r r c� a � N r v O M In O O O O M J M N O Ln m cm M Q7 O LO V V m m N 01 M Ln M 0 �f i m O Q N r° L CiM Do N co In M r- O N CO M V I� n v O m m M O O N r M N O (D m N M O f\ N N N M O m O m 0 �- V V co O N N L O m 1- 'n m to In N Ln O V O CD (D N I-- (D (D M (D O f` LO V w w M N CD N T m O N d N V V 7 0 00 Ln LO M O O LO m f� V O (O V Ln m O N N h m V Ln V N M m Ln M �- m 1� LO V O m m N m m LO I� N CO m N M 7 M V m (D Vt I- 00 O f� Ln Ln m M N I-. L N Ln (D LO v N m m I� m N N V L- LO Ln M e- m W N V N N CO J Ln (D Ln r r .- M m V V (D 07 V w (D m 00 O Q M m O M N O �_ N N M cO , m V 0 1- O V N LO ON r In m m m v M 1- O N M r' V m 0 1� m T N V Ln I� N (D 00 co (D Ln 1-- CD (O I� O V O r to I` N m O m M V M (O m N N o T O (n N 0 N V N O Ln M m LO O Ln Ln M 00 1� c- R M O O of r O M N m c0 M M N N (O co N N 7 co O 7 V Lf) N V LO O m co Ln V t` 00 m N m m lIi LO Uf V O M T N O O V Qm O Z y Ln r V co O J (O O LO Ln m M Ln O C' Ln V m Ln (` co (D O N M O M V' I- Q M m Ln co O N CO co LO O m O N m 00 I- v m O N r I� M (D O (D m � N m I- r N O M N N W r Ln O N W m O M (D Ln N I� N O V M m I` V N (D LO (D m (D (O M (O (D M (O I` Ln r r O Ln V m 00 M N O N N m m co O U) N M N f� M M LD M CO t!') m M N LO N CO T V N m m to m N CO N (M m M m 0 It (D In CO (D (O Ln LO I- m m cD m OJ co V O (D Ln CO N 1 V O m M N Z r m M CO O O N m L() f� O M m O m CO (D O M o) m N N Ln J r- 1-- Ln M co m Ln Lf') T N N co N M to N a M (D 0 N V O O Q N m (O O N m m m M Ln W M m co CD V N r O r N co co CO m CO OJ Ln N N M O LO M r m O7 O O OJ m M v m lO N N V N N O2 f� .-- (D V m (D V' O V V M V V I� O V Ln V V Ln O In V O M co N 00 m Dj O y N Q1 I` LO 00 m 7 M 1- N 00 m 0 O M (D Ln O M W M m Il- r CO 7 N M I� M co 00 (D M O f` 00 Ln cO LO W O m N N co N Ln m M t` In M N LO O N 7 m N V V M d' V V (D N o Z O M a ? O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ) O O O O F m O= 0 N Z 0 0 (M V 0 o LO (D 0 0 h N 0 0 m O 0 N M V 7 (O W m 0 N N N M N N V N O O l,J N IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� E -35 G Y LO d v m a CO O = N r co U m ¢I(" U. a JJ CY V co 21 N N LL O r 00 Ci Z) s 0 N � ti a a Q LL I.- M r m N [O - CO V i rCO off) rCl) Cif VN LL N O r CY -0 O O M N U U Q a Q A LL F LL rM (7 CLO O a. N _ M 0) r LU 7 m Q° O ° 0 M LL N M Y r r c� a � N r v N V 7 C U � Q 7 N V V LL LL h U U D Q (0 Q r LL V - V LL V r6 li 06 r° L CiM Do N O N N O LL N° JJ CY V co 21 N N LL O r 00 Ci Z) s 0 N � ti a a Q LL I.- M r m N [O - CO V i rCO off) rCl) Cif VN LL N O r CY -0 O O M N U U Q a Q A LL F LL rM (7 CLO O a. N _ M 0) r LU 7 m Q° O ° 0 M LL N M Y r c� T � N N V U � Q Q LL LL r 00 Ci Z) s 0 N � ti a a Q LL I.- M r m N [O - CO V i rCO off) rCl) Cif VN LL N O r CY -0 O O M N U U Q a Q A LL F LL rM (7 CLO O a. N _ M 0) r LU 7 m Q° O ° 0 M LL N M Y r CY -0 O O M N U U Q a Q A LL F LL rM (7 CLO O a. N _ M 0) r LU 7 m Q° O ° 0 M LL N M Y Un U 0 (D N H (6 F m co co V co Z) co O M IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -36 Y R d vM c a co �I m QI lD Y Q LL d Q o a CO r cD m N U) V LO M m -T M m V 0 M N U) t V U) U) U) N J LO M N M V M m il- m V M U) m 7 O M co M O M m m Q M O Y M U) U) U) ID (D M U) M (D I- c0 V M M N r M r m O r M M N N O M lt) V M co co � co (D M U) U) M N - co O N M m ID N N M N N M M M N O � M M M N M M N M N M O (D M M d m m ID CD 9 N d 'C co I� m O V I- V co 1- V O co U) CO I� O _ N CO _ O O V m Ip N M M M M O (D .- M M U) h (D (D M I� N M U) W N N M M M M M M M M M N N m N M O V U) I� U) m M m N V (D m y U!') T M v m U) m (D O M V V O r O m N M O V UO a m r co co O (N _ N N N �_ m V V M M 1- r � r m v M m N O +d„ 7 CD N O U W M r M N M N MI co U) N U) CO O M O U) O m U) N lD J Un N c- U) (D v O (D M U) N N U) M m m (D a U) m m M co co m M m o mo(D M M Nr m r N O r f� co U) m I-- M V M O I-- M M O O U) M N V M M U) CD m lI7 M O O U) M v m U) M V O T U) M M LO V m U) N m N m p 0 N M O M m U) N 1� V m 00 'q U) M f� M V m M 0 M N UO M U) N 7 Ln O V V N co V V M N V V r Un V t17 O M l!') lD M N (D 3 m co � J L a m M N co M O co M M m O M U) t` U) O N M J U) V 1� n (V M O M M I- M M M co O r' V co Q r N M I-_ (D co (O Il_ r�r-- W r U) It M N CO r O O r M I� 11 lD N N V m M I-- M M CO V N O (D N N U) m N U) M N M '- r m m N M M M M N m m N N n LO M M I- m M M v V M M I� N e- N ) (D N M C� r co CD O N (O O U) I- m M m 0 U) O M O U) U) M N M U) O N M I- O M N M (D N N V O N V M M M M M M U) M M I� co M co N m M O M M N m N M cr M U7 Q m W m 'O M a 7 Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O r C6 p= O 0 N Z 0 0 M V 0 0 U) (D 0 0 . M 0 0 C', O 0 � N M V U) (D I� M m 0 N N N M N N V N 0 O W N IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -36 Y R d vM c a co �I m QI lD Y Q LL d Q o a r b r r b OF v D _N n 'a V_ U C U V D N V u LL r LL V U D LL r 00 U m U O v O V eq. O LL MM M N m M N 7 O C.4. r b r 7 p b OF n D _N 9 V V_ U � � U V r r LL r LL r U) cD c U) co M r iJ CJ O r O 1� Ci p U N N U) M LL O r b r 7 p b OF D L D V V 9 V n u Q rl� rM Q LL �U) co r r li CY M u L N A W N N L� O LL t r b 7 p V M 9 V U � U U. r LL d. V — (D ar lOD L r o V O V T O N (O alO M IL M O Y a m (o `m (6 CO C (0 O a CO C N N 6 N (D (D V W W L� w u , Q r N N N N N E -37 O Y l0 d w = LO QIO Q 0 Y cl ° a (D N O w M (D O (0 O w In N O LO (D O T In 0 1l- V w r N J Q w Ln Ln N (D w r w Ln N w (O (D Ln U' V m r M S N (D m (D t O (n O M �-_ Ih L` V (0 M LO (D w V co O N m F O F (` I- Ln r m w M r m (D � r r w m O N V r M m T m V N N N V V r M V r (D C 0 w co N m v N co LO co O co N In (O Ln O co N V n co O M N N N r o r N O j > N d m m (O Ln f� V w M O c0 Ln V M In w V m m M m O O fo w M (0 � m M N N r co N r w LO f- m N (D O co CY V M (O m 11 M c] N M m N m w r m m w � � W C N LO Ln (0 co O o V w w r N O r N r r w n O m Ln Ln O m M J Q w In M N Ln w r O tO w r m m w M M m m M M CO V O m cD r w N W (D V Ln M tO co M M N w N Ln F m O F N O m CD r M LO Ln (D co Ln L` o co (` (D Ln m w r LO r (0 1l- w m M r r co M r w M w 7 m M V O N N O m N r M N w N N r M M r M Ln N r N N r r 0 Ln Ln (D T O �{ N 0) cc co Ln (` O M m M O w f� M m y Ln M o0 w O V V m LO LO V N r r M r r r N N N V LO r w O r N N N M M M o V' Ln 0 o (0 M o N M N V N N N CD N r 0 3 O m v W IA O M W O N w (0 rl_ r m M O I� 'q O t` w w M r O N J I- M M N t(') w In w f� Ln !� w N L` O W O LO w Ln LO m V F O O F O Ln w M O C N LO N w N r V w M O r O V m V V m LO w m N r r N r M w to 7 m N N N O O N N N w N m M N M Ln M N M N N (D r 1� O w 0 N W O � � N w 0 N N V N Ln r 0 0 0 @ r N r V N O O w Ln (D O O m M Ln Ln N M r N r M w m CO r N N r r N N N V w V r r � W � L V m Ln V N M w r co r r w w (D c0 O m O w r m O N O L` w J Q w LO M M (D �- N f� w N w N w r w V M w N M V CO V CO LO Cl W L\ W M w r w (D V w M w LO M N CD m F- 0 F M V O Ln r m V d' In V M w m W M Ln O ID V V w w co m M N r r LO I� r M Ln O o M V r w N r —w w w r Ln N m LO N M m co Ln N N N r w 0 m m O W O � � N w r V' r.-- r N W M O Ln r V c0 M w 0 co Ln w M m co @ lO M N r .- M M N w m w r N w W V r 3 m r N r r N N N co V In co N N r cc O w � a M ZO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O F m 0 O D = Z O N O M O O O O O O O C' N N N M N N V N O W N V W W L� w u , Q r N N N N N E -37 O Y l0 d w = LO QIO Q 0 Y cl ° a L � V O0) CYM Q LLLOn �Or LO O LL Vr. ° d' CY CO v O M N U LO U Q LL R F F 00 N G O m O O ii (3 vi D r-- F VI ° Q av �o aLQ LL M O LL M° Y F Ci C � C U � N V U n Ln CO LL F LL 11 U+ CO G N LO O Q (D L dM D CO Ci� C ce) R 00 C N LL r N ° L � V O0) CYM Q LLLOn �Or LO O LL Vr. ° d' CY CO v O M N U LO U Q LL R F F 00 N G O m O O ii (3 vi D r-- F VI ° Q av �o aLQ LL M O LL M° Y F d T N V U b � U R F m ~ Ln CO �w a" �V CD 11 U+ CO G N Ln C) L tD U Q N 0) IL n O L � V O0) CYM Q LLLOn �Or LO O LL Vr. ° d' CY CO v O M N U LO U Q LL R F F 00 N G O m O O ii (3 vi D r-- F VI ° Q av �o aLQ LL M O LL M° Y F Q 70 L �1 U U L) v v Q (� LL LL 0 o o6 d' CY CO v O M N U LO U Q LL R F F 00 N G O m O O ii (3 vi D r-- F VI ° Q av �o aLQ LL M O LL M° Y W U N W (D IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -38 0 Y R d 0) a o QQ rn _ U, QI rn QI o � o° a Q) N O O Q) W W V M V t` N r W i` P, W W O r C h O W J M N N V N M N M M W M Lo V W M O) W O W o o In h N LL Q r N (f) � n O V m In n W W O N V M M N r r F- W 0 F- rrnva (ntnv(D �o�'T t-vr- r- In W W�MN m r 0 0 r N N V N N r N f� W N N t_ D) N N N W V CO T O Cl) N V N N N (D r r M O (D O O O d N d r W W W W t` V N N C) W V O co M N O co r r �{ co CO O h (O Iq r N� 6) N r Q) V N r- M Ui W U) O CD W V W M r n m r M M N N N N N N N N M N r r � W � C N r In M V V t, N W t : t- M W V 7 O 6) O W N W V C) (o M r J D) M M M V N V (n N r O r W V W U) W M M U) M Q r M M W Un W (o W (D t-- i` t-- f` W n V V N r V � O 0 F- r LO CD CP co r O) N M u7 co M W M w Lo r N N O M W Ln N N N r r Q) r r N M N (n r N M W co co co co M V- M N 'V (n r M M W W N N W r r r lf') M 0 LO N a) 7E7 O M M O M O W W r M CT r W r W n r N r W O (n r r N W O) r LO V M co r M N r M co O co N M t` co co O Un co co U) O) N r (n M D) T M W 3 m � O W y to r W CD M N O M In O V N m N N (o N r (D O N U) O co J W V r� r In W O N O co CO r O co n V co In V M N Q r M to m W N N W Un Uf) (D (D I-- Co N 7 M N r In F- (D r n W r W O N O U7 m (o Co co r O (O -,t N o 0 U) Un C (D r M W N N O N V Un N N N r M N W M M O M V V' N V co W O N N N W r N O m ((j CD O CD N UJ CO O (O N O O W O V co m N N r 0 U) W O O (D N r N N r O N N O M N O M lI') (fl N N r Co N N N M N M N N r 0 In m W O O "t r V r O W J O <{ M M In r Un r co h r M t W W r- O In W N (n M M O) M a r M U7 U7 V 't lf-I U-1 Uf) Ui f` (n 't M M N r r H m 0 r 'T U) O co r- M (D In (n M U!7 O O V W co O Un (D O r (n m M N N N u7 V r W r N N N N V N N O M co M N r M M M (D V' V M V co N M (P N r 'cY M CO O) W O N CD V M M O) W V f� W O V M N O C', O In O r N W O O Cl) r r N W r 0 0 In O to V Un N W In N N W d' N M In n N N M m CD t` .- 7 m N M M N N N N r � W � M QZ 7 O O 00 O 0 O O O o O o O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q F m °= Q G Z N 0 0 M 0 V (n Co 0 0 0 r- CO 0 0 O) o— 0 N M V' (n O h W O) O N N N N CO V Cl Cl 0 N W IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -38 0 Y R d 0) a o QQ rn _ U, QI rn QI o � o° a F- f � M V U 0 n 'a J C �rn J N V O M n T V m N O LL n F- LL W _ W W LL � — W N L r- O U? U.) u Cis or C?;° MW O Z C R W C N LL N F- CY n 7 N � M V U � r V U D D t LL F-a ~ �rn 7 M V M n T 1 O LL m N O H Cl p � F- � M V U D D t V b U 7 R Q Q F� ~rn LL �(D W _ W W "ir ~ ~ L r- O 04 Q U U� O LL O V ° H Cl p � � M V U LL LL O M U( F- O lj C~i`i O O (0 LL M W LL IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -39 D Y R d m N d V m = r Q LL U M on m M T r m N 1 N Ln N M V m O M O I: N Ln r r O J Ln V M m I- V I� co N V I- m Ln V (D I-_ 7 M O M Ln m Ln N Q N Y N m f� W-' co _ N N M r M 0 0 co O V M N O F- m O H O N N V M W (D V I- W W r r I-- N r M O N I-- W N O m N r r Ln N •' O Ln V CD m (D (D Ln V M Ln Ln 7 Ln 7 (D Ln V O N V M I� V M O m't N r m M N I- (D � O cD N d � M M .- I� m r r (D M N n N M N t� N t` t` O N m to (fl (p M N N V V 'V r m In O M V o O h M V N m Ln Ln M Ln m 0 of (D (o c0 fp m O V M N r M W N M r N O V OJ N r Ln OJ (D m W m M 0 (D M r r Ln m Ln Ln Ln V , O V r O O T V N M N r cD F m O F V M N M M co �n 7 m f-- O m M r Ln M m m V M V N m f� Ln N r r Ln N r O (D d' I� co m Ln Ln Ln Ln In V M O �- M m m Ln m V N r- M M (D N r r I� T N (D N cD O W N CD V N O I� Ln I� t` r o o Ln m m f� r N m OJ I� M r co Cl 3 m N r N In Ln Ln r co N c0 co (D Ln In M N •- N U' w N N m (D co co M V m N o M M Il 7 N O M Ln Ln w m (D O N f� J Q Ln M V co V N N N O m lf') m N m Ln O O V r Ln Ln r O O N r O V M O co co m Ln M W N N N W In r I,- O r O m W O Cl N Y N Ln O m O W L V r (� co O V r Ln O In I-- m W Ln �- (D ao O� CD r (D (D N Ln J r Ln V M of c0 V M O m� O O M Ln M m m V V . f� In (D 7 CD N m M m m m co V N N M N M �- O - N r M H m M r"t m� m N I-- co m O V ( I� co m r N r Ln V M r (D I� T N V N M m f- co (D N d' rr- O r r r i� N (D t` Ln O Ln V co O N N N W r (D m O N d co N O I` N O m N M (D m of V (D I-- I- w r w N (D N (D co CD M N M (D Ln co m r O co r Ln M Ln M N M O O m o M V 3 m r M V V Ln m m m r Ln O Ln V N N r cM W C7 J Q ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 Q� O= O O Z r N O o M 0 V Ln 0 0 O r 0 0 W m o O O r r N M V In O r W m 0 r N N N N cn N N O C> W N IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN E -39 D Y R d m N d V m = r Q LL U F O H O M Q m V O C O N :V U U U Q i Q V LL ~ LL H O M O > O O f0 F- m F N u ON Cio O O D E) LL ° N LL N F O F O M C1 m O N 0 N U 9 � U U \ Q F- M m L 0 O 0 LL H M O r > m '0 m Lu CY m 0 QO U r O r N O E) LL F O O M � f3 O L 0 N � m U o U Q LL U LL M O N F- M m L 0 O 0 m F-N 00 C3 (.C) Q L O mu r r O :.r-: V LL F O O M V U F M 0 O O m m -Li O N 0'1 a OD UI o cli M N LL N M O Y E a a KIIN a E 41 W 0 a O a I 4J t4 Ha H U a •� ow a w U) ro Z , H >. H W o ro Q H z � E, ro H N R: N P W rC W Q rl r.0 7 Q C H C a 0 a rn W O 0 N 1*1 a W H a a 0 U 0 4 1J G 0 O U II � N II N 4J II C'--+ U b G II rn b o II rn o II • or:!) iiLn Q u �• s4 II w ' 4J II O U II Lo F-4 u Ln ro o II lo- E o II Q Y II oo Q II o II J c W II > II U ro n 3 11 O or�oiioo FC H II M 0 11 N II II O -H II o U II >•I II gllw � Ii C II O O II o 4j II r u II U II N II sa II Q II 3 II m H II II m II a II U u o II II H II W II w II 3 C II O II v 4� u a II H U II m U II a Q II cn N N II +J a u n , II v1 II C' ' _H II O tn II N E -40 0 C 0 0 x0 >, �a I o U) 3 O O O SJ C II o x Ir X 7 41 W C 4�j N N � q w w 0 N Q s4 b � S � N 3 s+roo 4) 40 x m 10 1 H U, F II . cn S1 1! tp •. m N S-I w N ro v W a 0 ro o N •t4 > 0 4 o •d 41 C II W O W U II 0 •. a m 0 N •, it ro m V1 r-I N U b r 4J U to U W C 7 U LI [.+ C ro� [�4 N JJ U � 4J 4� Q N sa II Q W II .. Q II W 41 ro rn b U a� u ro LI ta LI U 1 W 4 U Fr N r W 4) E b U N a N W a�roaa� H 0 H o x II II > 1:c F W W k4 a) rQ J � H H ro ro 4, 0 ro ;:" ;:3 14 0 0 0 0 O O U U aUrL <C N 0 N N M M M a �H H� F W W W 4J q O F 4J x „ H Q �a UI M O �I N 0 C Q a w N N w O N ro w r .-1 u7 O 0 N N ro u a a) E H w N 0 a a I W L1 E 044 E U a 44 o w a w Z ro 9 E Ell >r o ro Q E z a) W b� E ro H 3-I a v a > a � W Q o ro Q C H C a Fc O a m wo 0 N / 1 �� a W H a a 0 U 0 4 a) G 0 O U II M I1 II w II E U II M t W II b C II o ro o II o C> II a) H I N Q Q II �n w I N u ao C 41 Q U II N : w II u-, C II o ro o II � 1 o II • Q x II C) w u� sa II m : +j II > 11 U ro o 3 11 O Qoii° rta E II N N II 0 -H 11 - U II N II u II -1 u Q II 3 � II G II o O II -1 .H m 41 II Uu N II >y II Q II W Ln U U II H II � u� II m II W II O II E II � II W II 3 ox 11a II O II 2 II o u � +u . II R 5 U II rn aNiiia Q II U) u a -H II M E II a) II a ID II cn u o E -41 aJ O 4X '0 U 0 G H O Q4 Q a u >+ W U ro v I 3 a M I I o v m G G 3 O 0 O G II U N X 3 C II o x ai o II r W ; 41 ro (0 Q V) Q W W W (1) Q O Q N s Z1 N � sv va O 1 I saro0 -�I aJ w H � � II W H U) i4 4J 'a n w >+ 1 M a) u ro 0 o a) •.i 0 a4 O -H 4 G u a o a U II ) a � N u ro w U) H U U ro u • U H U U W C W 7 U O f-I W C (D a)wW H + a In CD Q a I-I II Q W II .. Q II W t! 1 .. ro rn O U aJ vw ro a m s4 t W U l+ (D .-1 W J a) a N W rl C E a/roaa) H O x X II u > � E W II II W W N 'O 41 .4 11 ro a ro ro +4aaa w w 0 0 r O O D U H P4844 N II II II II W Ur•C r.0 •• m ro m o >a � 4 ° E W W W 14 a) E : ro aJ Q Q H £ U) x -i C] a ai E H 4J W 0 a U a 4J S-I HO N H a F U a41 o w a w U) ro z N rC H H � o ro H z v w o+ E ro H S-I a v 0 > w FC W ❑ rl ro ❑ G I-I G 0 a w 0 o O N b : ❑ ❑ : Qx C ro Q m� N C o o oo � N ❑ xw U . IIIIIIIIIIiu Iu IIII I I I iI I I I I r rn � m � rn rn rn � aa rn O o O 3 ❑ s+ 4u H U W LO N II 14 4J w o� o J ��.•$ Q4Q >ro G G 0 U v -� U N u � C �AO v � I . IIIIIIIIIIIIIu u III IIIIn I I I I lI ' I I I I I I I I I w W 0 0 0N H II O u 1 w O II uI I � o X Iuu n I ❑ � a a u o Iuu IIiIu I1I I I I i I I 1 I H � a w ra o U m O o o2 a a H 4Q � I u n Iu iIIu u IIIIIu II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I � N r U w £ � a W o I 4 w o a w ® M 0 0 I I I U C 0¢ 1- G -H O U] El E -42 m II r •"+ ii o v u f-I U •O U ro G o v a u 7 W 3 a I v to 0 0 0 X 3 U G II Q •, x II � •� w �:j mow w v v ❑ uv ro •� v v 3 b v 3 d Lo I u ro v . 4o 40 1 U N El F N U, F S4 4 � ro • - V7 w N ro v u u > ro o v p 0 S- O o u G It a o a U It � rn it ro m U ro 4J U rn U W G a U 34 W G ro a v4J w O 4) 41 ') Q N m u It ❑ 0 L-4 Q II ..Q II ✓s W 4t d •, -1 v ro 54 0 u U vw 4J 4J U S4 N rl W 4� E ro U � C & v ro H r i v O x x H w II II W W ni v r v A 4 m j rl m ro +aa1 u 0 0 4 O O U U W U c� rC 0.iUKC 4 0 b, of IT a ro ro m :�, r-1 r-A -A H W w W v H : 4J ❑ Q E+ m x' -P k N H ❑ UI M O �I N 0 0 Q a N N W O N tr� ro a, r H c 0 0 N 1 S4 ro vn a w a a E -42 m II r •"+ ii o v u f-I U •O U ro G o v a u 7 W 3 a I v to 0 0 0 X 3 U G II Q •, x II � •� w �:j mow w v v ❑ uv ro •� v v 3 b v 3 d Lo I u ro v . 4o 40 1 U N El F N U, F S4 4 � ro • - V7 w N ro v u u > ro o v p 0 S- O o u G It a o a U It � rn it ro m U ro 4J U rn U W G a U 34 W G ro a v4J w O 4) 41 ') Q N m u It ❑ 0 L-4 Q II ..Q II ✓s W 4t d •, -1 v ro 54 0 u U vw 4J 4J U S4 N rl W 4� E ro U � C & v ro H r i v O x x H w II II W W ni v r v A 4 m j rl m ro +aa1 u 0 0 4 O O U U W U c� rC 0.iUKC 4 0 b, of IT a ro ro m :�, r-1 r-A -A H W w W v H : 4J ❑ Q E+ m x' -P k N H ❑ UI M O �I N 0 0 Q a N N W O N tr� ro a, r H c 0 0 N 1 S4 ro vn E a a ai E E ij 0 a a, 4J 1-I H 0 H 04 H U 0 41 O 41 P. w U) ro Z . rC H H � w o ro Q H z W U b El ro H a v a) a � Q � ro ❑ c H C O � w o N a w H a a 0 U O C 0 O U w I r u u E, w ii C II rn ro o II rn o II N rl II rn 41 It ❑ ❑ II � 3 II � sd II ❑ U II m 44 r o II ❑ II o >•+ c a! II x U II rn w u >, II w rou S II o 0 o o ii 0 C S II N RC E II N II o C II II 4J II U II N II u II •rl II ❑ II � u w II o C II II 41 II U II N II uu ❑ II II II ❑ u II a II P7 II a n w II a II o n U II E II O II a II w a I F:l II In u z uo II tb C II v o II II N II r a u I >4 II U II M V) II rn ❑ It to U 0 II u a II El U) II � II cli 41 II Unii ° E -43 b U 0 C O N rx u >w as I N m o O O AX $ U C I o x 41 •• x ro41 w ;:j aiQUw W N N ❑ u 'o � sa 1s b � I u ro v N11 W W H II .. U a! ro •. U N u wa+ ro v m 0 ro o 0 4 O b su+ C II 04 O a U II a� •. a [n N N •. II ro m cn rl m U ro m U W 7 U u w C ro u 1 4 0 > m J Q N ca m m � oQ W II II in b U ✓T Q) 4J ro 14 m 14 U N W 1J aJ U s+ a w 4-1 E ro U 0 a ro w H £ O x X H W .ww vro N j] J1 r r ro ro ro +aaa u 0 O O 0 U u U W U 4 4 W C) m m m arororo , .--I w w w aJ ❑ ❑ H -H c m x a� X 11 H Q u U 0 �I N C Cl ❑ w Q N N ID W O N ro a r H u� c r-I 0 CD 0 N w I E a a N E F p u 0 a 0 a I N u o F a El F U a 4-4 ow a w w ro z u D E a F >, H 0 ro Q H z o w to E- ro H LI a (1) P P. FC CA W Q r-I ro FC 7 Q C I-I C a a o� wo 0 H a w H a 0 U 0 C C O U w I r IIm c 4J II E, W II C II rn ro o II rn N rl II rn Q Q II rn S II rn J u m Q U II rn = w II m b C I r ro o II w E o II co Q x u Q s4 x U II rn c w II T II w ro u 3 11 0 El 0 o ii o0 H 11 N II W II o .1 II U II N II -i II Q u u w II o C II ou --I II 1� II U II N II u n -�I n Q n I � x Q I I II > u a II W u w II O II U I � II � II � II O II a II W n w II £ n� II a o z II o O II 2 u II 'A II 0 11 a Qum 4J a. ii •.+ :�, II U) E II J II -�i II o U) II r E -44 41 N 4x O U C H 0 O N a Q (D U ro a� I 1 0 II o 0 ro I G C 0 r 0 O O C II U N x � C II o .x � o II 3 x ;3 W �:3 u 41 IVro Q ro Q w a W N D N Q N t b N ro -.c w o G) 3 b N I -rl u ro o -H +) JJ x ro F II U1 E W 34 ao ro rn N 34 w N ro 0 u u > ro o o -. u 4 u o r u C II W o a U II v •. a � rn fn u N U (0 1) U U) U W C 44 7 U O S4 w C ro� - a1 a) w ro s a Q ro a u u Q w Q II � U 1 � u '0 N W 41 4J U u N _4 w N >~ ro U v a v w � C ✓; o ro m E E r 0 o x F W II II ai v w w .Si JJ ro +J a 0 ro ro aa 0 0 0 0 r CL U FC RC Ln N u ro m rn o p.m rom o �, •-i H H N E w w w 14 O F r ro 4J El •ri � c I m x � a a ai a E H J-I it 0 a U1 a 4j S4 Ela H U 0 Ow 41 a w U) ro z H l H >+ o ro F z (0 w tr� H N a o C14 > C14 FC W ❑ rl a a Q G H r a O .] w o 0 O N C: : 0Q Q x �a N C ro E N m a -o o o� ❑ x w U IIIIII IIIiIu IIIu I I I I I I I I I iI I I I I 040 F U � rn rn rn rn � ao v � Q n w t+ w m -) 4-) >+ II w (0 II o 1 11 C, H 11 N q G U N �U � IIIu I I I O 0 II -H r aq � + I I Iu I u IIIu u I I I I I o w o Sa u I � x I I lI a W II q Io Iu IIIIIuI I I I I � W U a � a w H a a II O II O I £ II � IIa II w II w uo a w I II H a a w a a oN C � iu 0 -,1 IIIIIII I i I I I I I I I I I I I H >a � W I o U] II r II � E -45 ZS U (0 c o v a s, >, w 0404 I I 3 O O 0 14 C II U x 3 D w II 3 x a u ro� w a Coro w q w W N N ❑ >~ b � 0404 � � 3 s+roa -,I aJ aJ c m (0 H II cn F W II Un Sr ,� ro w N ro v sa 0 N (0 o N -.i N >+ N O a -.4 r a 01104 o a U II v •. a rn .. II V1 (0 m N u U (0 1j U rn U W C a U s4 w c ro 41 a vw > N +) n a� Q m LI II Q w II .. Q II tp w u .. (0 rn b U N a aJ (0 L w W U N W 41 J-) U !4 N i w w v a v w H o x F W t [. fli. ai •o r A +J rl ri (0a m ro + 04 a a a + E 0 O U U ) O aUa4aC W U l�l fA N fn N bI b+ of 04 (0 (0 (0 >1 r-1 '-A � F w w w N F 4J ❑ ❑ H U) m x w k AJ H ❑ L) U m O I N 0 0 Q a Q N N W O N a r c O O N Sa In Appendix F Historical AADT Trends Segment: Davis Blvd. from Radio Rd. to C.R.591 Location: Davis Blvd. west of S.R.951 CS: 03 -0193 Year AADT FDOT Linear Trend 1994 15,500 16,221 1995 17,000 16,683 1996 16,500 17,144 1997 15,500 17,605 1998 16,500 18,067 1999 16,900 18,528 2000 19,000 18,989 2001 21,500 19,451 2002 21,500 19,912 2003 22,500 20,373 2004 24,000 20,835 2005 25,000 21,296 2006 24,000 21,757 2007 22,000 22,219 2008 18,900 22,680 2009 18,600 23,141 2019 27,754 FDOT Count Station 03 -0193 Location: Davis Blvd. west of S.R.951 3u,uuu I 25,000 --------- --- ----------------- -- -- -- ----- ----------- --------------------------- 20,000 ------------------ - ----- - ---- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------ oQ15,000 -- -- - - -- - - -- -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- a10.000 ------------------------------------------------------------ ---- ------ -- --- ----- -- - - - -• - ��FDOT Count 5,000 ----------------------------------------------------- ' Linear Trend I 0 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Year Annual Growth Rate: 2.0% Segment: Collier Blvd. from Golden Gate Blvd. to Green Blvd. Location: Collier Blvd. north of Pine Ridge Road. CS: 536 F ear County `Linea 2001 28,007 32,964 2002 31,031 32,804 2003 33,549 32,645 2004 35,421 32,486 2005 37,304 32,327 2006 36,939 32,167 2007 32,859 32,008 2008 27,890 31,849 2009 27,939 31,689 2019 30,097 Annual Growth Rate: -0.5% 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 Q 20.000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 County Count Station 536 Location: Collier Blvd. north of Pine Ridge Rd. --*-County Count Linear Trend 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year F -1 Segment: Collier Blvd. from Green Blvd. to Golden Gate Pkwy. Location: Collier Blvd. north of Golden Gate Pkwy. CS: 525 Annual Growth Rate: 0.1% County Count Station 525 Location: Collier Blvd. north of Golden Gate Pkwy. 35,000 30,000 -- ------------- - -- - - -- ---------------------------------------------------------- 25,000 --------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- 20.000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Qo a15,000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10,000 ---------------------- ----- --- ----------------- ---- -- - -— County AADT 5,000 ------------------------ -- ----------------- -- --- -----I Linear Trend 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year Segment: Collier Blvd. from Golden Gate Pkwy. to 1 -75 (N) Location: Collier Blvd. south of Golden Gate Pkwy. CS: 607 Year AADT County Linear Trend 2001 28,115 26,421 2002 22,415 26,177 2003 23,232 25,932 2004 25,815 25,688 2005 29,160 25,444 2006 30,060 25,199 2007 25,191 24,955 2008 23,1381 24,711 2009 21,8671 24,466 2019 ;.' 22,023 Annual Growth Rate: -1.0% County Count Station 607 Location: Collier Blvd. south of Golden Gate Pkwy. 35,000 -- 30.000 ---- ------ ---- - - - - -- - ----------------------------------------------------------- 25,000 - - --- - - - - - -- -- -- ------------------------------------------------- 20,000 Qo a15,000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.000 ----------------------------------------------------- --*— County AADT 5, 000 °-------------- - - - - -- - - -------------------------- — Linear Trend 0 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 Year F -2 Hacienda Lakes MPUD Application Submittal BCC Review Materials CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT Hacienda Lakes Conceptual Water Management Report Prepared for: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 3921 Prospect Avenue Naples, Florida 34104 Prepared by: 71)A'X Jn tNC Visualizgation CONSULTING Civil Engineering 1 1 ♦ Tl 1 Surveying & Mapping 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34104 Prepared By: Jereme Shaidle, P.E. Reviewed By: Emilio Robau, P.E. Date: May 2011 DIVA INC. Planni Visualization CONSULTING Civil Engineering Z, t T ♦ 1 Z Surveying & Mapping Conceptual Water Management Report Hacienda Lakes is located in sections 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 25 of Township 50 South, Range 26 East, and sections 19 and 30 Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The property is generally located east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), south of Interstate I -75, and north of U.S. 41 in the eastern portion of Collier County. The entire Hacienda Lakes project is composed of 1,760 residential units, retail, office, and school, and encompasses 2,262 +/- acres. The proposed system will provide water management for 695 +/- acres. The remaining acreage will be dedicated as preserve or remain as is with the current uses. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site is predominantly undeveloped wetlands and agricultural lands. A portion of the site, which is used for recreation purposes, is known as the Sports Park or the Swamp Buggy Days. This area has been previously cleared and developed. There is a 170 foot Florida Power and Light (FPL) easement that runs north and south along the western portion of the property. Currently, the storm runoff produced from the area between the FPL easement and the Henderson Creek Canal sheetflows toward the west and ultimately into the canal. Sabal Palm Road runs east to west throughout the width of the project. This creates another unnatural sheetflow barrier which drains runoff towards both the canal and towards the easterly wetlands. The majority of the storm runoff created from the remainder of the site sheetflows to the east from the property edges to the main wetland located in the middle of the property. This vast wetland stretches into the project and expands as it moves to the east. As the runoff moves more towards the east, the flow direction gradually changes and becomes more southeastern to southern. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, the project is located in a flood zone "X" with no related minimum elevation. However, according to Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc. most of the Hacienda Lakes project is located in areas designated on the "draft" FIRMS as AH- zones. The AH designation means that the flooding depths during the 100 -year, 3 -day rainfall are less than 3 feet. A portion of the project in the southeast is in an AE zone which indicates more than 3 feet of flood depth during the 100 -year, 3 -day storm. The site varies topographically from 6.2 to 13.0 feet NGVD. The project is located within the Henderson Creek Basin which has a maximum discharge rate of 0.15 cfs /acre. However, to be consistent with the Belle Meade Study and with Big Cypress Basins request the discharge has been reduced to 0.06 cfs /acre north of Sabal Palm Road. PROPOSED WATER MANAGEMENT Water Quality Design Strategy The water management system design utilizes the best management practices recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, The South Florida Water management District, and other agencies, which regulate the Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development \Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Support\Hearings\EAC\2011 -05 -16 Conceptual Water Management Report.docx 7/16/2010 2 of 4 DIVA INC. Planning Visualization CONSULTING Civil Engineering ® Z t T Il 1 Surveying & Mapping 1� management and use of surface and groundwater resources. The design provides stormwater treatment facilities in excess of the minimum standards used by South Florida Water Management District. Listed below is a summary of the system process and controls incorporated in the design to treat stormwater runoff. Pollutant Source Reduction Program The project will be maintained and operated by a community association or a community development district. This operation entity will manage source reduction programs that will monitor the application and use of potential pollutants into the area served by the surface water management system. The operation entity will be responsible for the proper handling of potential pollutants such as pesticides, herbicides and petroleum distillates. A public community education program will be implemented that will be targeted at providing educational information to the community residents that link their activities to the potential for pollutant distribution. When necessary, to facilitate community education, signage and other informational tools will be used to create an awareness of where the system drainage basins discharge to and will indicate that all drainage facilities ultimately end up in the lakes and surface waters of the natural systems. The program will be focused on reducing the discharge of pollutants into the drainage system by residents by providing education and making people aware of the potential impacts of their activities. Water Quality Treatment Facilities The water management design contains design elements that are intended to provide enhanced water quality treatment in addition to South Florida Water Management District minimum standards. Here is a brief listing of some of these facilities. Drainage Collection System Catch Basins — The majority of the project catch basins have been specified to contain a sedimentation sump that is intended to provide the first in a series of opportunities to separate out pollutant particulates and other debris that fall into the project drainage collection system. These catch basins will be routinely cleaned as part of the source reduction program described above. Detention Time - One of the backbone elements of the surface water management system design includes drainage system routings intended to detain the runoff from the developed property. The system of lakes has been interconnected so that the travel time for runoff has been extended to the maximum extent practicable. The design is consistent with both South Florida Water Management District criteria and recommendations presented in the report titled Evaluation of Alternative Stormwater Regulations for Southwest Florida. Separation of Roadway Drainage Outfalls and Project Outfalls - Drainage discharges coming from the roadway and other developed lands are not positioned next to project outfalls. This increases detention times and allows for full advantage of all of the treatment provided in the lakes. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development \Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Support\Hearings \EAC\2011 -05 -16 Conceptual Water Management Report.docx 7/16/2010 3 of 4 INC Planning DIVA Visualization CONSULTING Civil Engineering QAL t 1 ♦ 1 1 Surveying & Mapping C Lakes, Lake Depth, and Dimensional Criteria - The project has been designed with many lakes which are consistent with the South Florida Water Management District dimensional criteria including lakes that are deep enough to optimize volumetric treatment. Littoral Zones - The lakes will be planted with littoral zone plantings to provide for biological process water quality treatment which will reduce the chemical and biological oxygen demand and further aide in improving water quality. Additional 50% Water Quality Treatment Volume - The system has been designed to provide fifty percent (50 %) more water quality treatment volume than is required by South Florida Water Management District Design Criteria. Spreader Swales at Outfalls — The outfall system has been designed to limit the impact of point discharges into the wetlands. For the outfalls that have a significant discharge, a spreader swale/berm has been added to increase the length of the outfall creating an energy dissipater. The result is the same discharge spread over a larger area. ENVIRONMENTAL The total amount of preserve on the Hacienda Lakes property is 1544 +/- ac. or approximately 68% of the entire site. Due to the extensive amount of wetlands onsite, the site plan has considered several different designs to avoid and minimize impacts to the wetlands and natural features. The wetlands with greater than 50% coverage by melaleuca are generally located on the western portion of the property and the exotic infestation generally decreases towards the eastern portion of the property. The site plan was designed to preserve the higher quality wetland habitats on -site with development areas occurring only within the lower quality exotic infested wetlands. Seasonal water elevations for the preserved wetlands will be maintained by routing surface water flows from the proposed development areas through stormwater management facilities into the wetlands. One technique used to determine the control elevations for the stormwater management system was established based on the elevations of the biological indicators of wetland water levels. These indicators were also compared with data collected from onsite water level monitoring wells. These design features will ensure that surface water levels within the preserved wetlands are maintained and length of inundation improved. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0005 Mixed Use Planned Unit Development \Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Support\Hearings\EAC\2011 -05 -16 Conceptual Water Management Report.docx 7/16/2010 4 of 4 DAITA 1W. CONSULTING Z \ T Tl 1 • Planning • Visualization • Civil Engineering - Surveying & Mapping MEMORANDUM DATE: October 27, 2010 TO: Passarella & Associates, Inc. FROM: Jereme J. Shaidle, P.E. RWA, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Hacienda Lakes MPUD PUDZ-2006-AR- 10 146 — Hacienda Lakes PUD SUBJECT: Summary of Harvey Harper Water Quality Analysis A Harvey Harper Analysis has been performed to compare the pre vs. post nutrient loadings for the project area. Total Nitrogen and Phosphorus loadings (kilogram/ year) were less in the post development than the predevelopment. A series of interconnected wet detention lakes provide the necessary treatment to reduce total nitrogen and phosphorus to a level below pre - development conditions. Therefore, the proposed project does not contribute any additional nutrient loadings than what the site contributes in its undeveloped or current state. ® Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRi -ERP \0005 Mixed Ilse Planned Unit Development \Subtask 5.2 MPUD Application Support\Engineeting Response\21010 -10 -27 Harvey Harper Summary Memo.docx 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 • (239) 597 -0575, fax: (239) 597 -0578 • www.consult- rwa.com Aw Al "DA"X IA 1tvC.Visualiz Visualization CONSULTING Civil Engineering AL %, T T1 JL. Surveying & Mapping HACIENDA LAKES Project Proj. #: Calculated By: Checked By: HACIENDA LAKES 050150.02.03 JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 Pre- Development vs. Post - Development Analysis Content - Assumptions - Pre - development Load Analysis - Post - development Load Analysis - Storm Treatment - Recommendations - Lake Volume - Water Management Calculations Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0007 Environmental Resource Permitting\Subtask 7.2 ERP Application Preparation \Water Management Calculations\RA12 \2010 -07 -12 Harvey Harper water quality.xls 7/15/2010 Content 1 of 26 4:21 PM N C+� 0 'D"X'X TAINC. Project Planning Proj. #: Visualization Calculated By: CONSULTING Civil Engineering Checked By: .JL \ ►. V i ,Z Surveying & Mapping HACIENDA LAKES HACIENDA LAKES 050150.02.03 JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 Pre - Development vs. Post - Development Analysis Assumotions 1. All roadways, sidewalks, driveways and roofs will be classified as directly connected impervious areas. 2. Hydrologic Soil Group D was determined based on the USDA Collier County Area, Florida, Soils Descriptions. Collier Soil & Water Conservation District. Soils in area are primarily classified as Boca, Hallendale, Pineda and other fine sands. Some soils are classified as depression], and some soils include limestone substratum. 3. The Pre - Development Condition for the entire Drainage Area is undeveloped land with 0% impervious cover. 4. The Post - Development Condition will be a network of connected basins each serving either single - family or multi - family development. All basins are treated as multi - family development for purposes of estimating nutrient loading. The multi - family designation best suits the typical project land use coverage percentages however the actual unit types vary. Impervious cover is calculated per basin as shown in the Water Management Calculations. 5. Wet Detention is the method of nutrient removal. Lake Areas contribute flow (run -off). Areas covered by lakes do not directly contribute to nutrient loading. 6. The total Drainage Area will consist of 616.87 acres for which the water management system will be constructed. 7. There will be a berm constructed around the water management system (Drainage Area) , with a minimum crest elevation set at the 100 year 3 day peak. 8. Inflows for each Lake will include run -off from contributing basins and discharges from connected Lakes. For further understanding of the connections throughout the system of lakes, please refer to the Environmental Resource Plans. 9. Areas outside of the surface water management system will not be altered, therefore pre - development vs. post- development loading have not been calculated for these areas, as they are the same. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0007 Environmental Resource Permitting\Subtask 7-2 ERP Application Preparation \Water Management Calculations \RA12 \2010.07 -12 Harvey Harper water quality.xls 7/15/2010 Assumptions 2 of 26 4:21 PM D], -D-X-X A INC, PVilanning sualization CONSULTING Civil Engineering Z t V ♦1 J. Surveying & Mapping Project HACIENDA LAKES Proj. #: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 HACIENDA LAKES Pre - Development vs. Post - Development Analysis Pre - development Characteristics Land Use Summary Land Use Category Area Conditions Undeveloped Ground Cover / Soil Type Impervious Area / %DCIA 616.87 Good 616.87 Ground Cover HSG Woods D Land Use Category Impervious % DCIA '% Undeveloped 0% Oo /n Curve Number / Runoff Coefficient Land Use Category non - DCIA CN C Value From TR• 55, Table 2 -2c Itom App—b. C Woods * TR= Technical Release 77 0.515 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPIID- DRI -ERP \0007 Environmental Resource Pertnitting \Subtask 7.2 ERP Application Preparation \Water Management Calculations\RAI2\2010 -07 -12 Harvey Harper water quality.xls 7/15/2010 Pre - develp Load Analysis 3 of 26 4:21 PM N] DA"XIAINC. Planning Visualization c o N S %1 I -T I N G Civil Engineering .A— \ T T 1 Z Surveying & Mapping Annual Runoff Volumes Project HACIENDA LAKES Proj. #: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 Annual Runoff Vol. = Annual Rainfall (in/yr) * Area (ac) * C value * (lft/12in) Land Use Category Annual Rainfall Area C Value Runoff A—, A— t yr Undeveloped 53.00 616.87 0.515 1403.12 Runoff Characteristics From WW 7 Land Use Category Total Nitrogen (TN) Total Phosphorus (TP) mgt mgt Undeveloped 1.15 0.06 Pre- develoument Loadings of TN & TP TN load (kg/yr) = Runoff (ac- ft/yr) * 43,560 ft ^2 /ac * 7.48 gal /ft ^3 * 3.785 liter /gal * TN (mg/1) * 10 ^ -6 (kg/mg) TP load (kg/yr) = Runoff (ac- ft/yr) * 43,560 ft^2 /ac * 7.48 gal /ft ^3 * 3.785 liter /gal * TP (mg/1) * 10 ^ -6 (kg /mg) Land Use Cate ory Runoff Total Load i I -ii �T kg yr TN TP Undeveloped 1,403.12 1,989.98 95.17 Total 1,989.98 95.17 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0007 Environmental Resource Permitting \Subtask 7.2 ERP Application Preparation \Water Management Calculatiom RA12\2010.07.12 Harvey Harper water quality.xls 7/15/2010 Pre - develp Load Analysis 4 of 26 4:21 PM 1 Planning . V isludiznurx3 CONSULTING Civil Enginearml; .AL IqL V 11 i Surveying & Mapping Project HACIENDA LAKES Proj. #: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 Checked By. JJS Date: 14- Ju1-10 HACIENDA LAKES Pre - Development vs Post - Development Analysis Post - development Characteristics Land Use Summary Land Use Category Area Conditions Multi - Family Rmdental nit..x' NA Loading rates for Multi- Family Residential arc taken f onl studies ranging from 61 "-, to 74 impe inns. Ground Cover /Soil Types Ground Cover HSG Open Space D Impervious 5!A Lakes N/A Impervious Area I %DCIA 13asin Land Use Category Area Open Space Impervious (Open Space +Imurrviousl c" In Lakes Lake I Multi -Family Residential 36.69 1231 20.90 13.21 3,48 Lake Multi - Family Residential 28.58 11.33 14.83 26.16 2.42 Lake Multi - Family Residential 47.72 14.50 23.57 38.07 9.65 Lake 4 Multi - Family Residential 17.30 5.60 8.23 13.83 3.47 Lakes Multi - Family Residential 33.71 6.52 21.58 28.10 5.61 Lake 6 Multi-Family Residential 22.28 4.89 14.44 19.33 2.95 Lake Multi -Family Residential 16.69 4.41 7.41 11.82 4.87 Off Site ROW #1 Multi-Family Residential 1.61 0.32 1.29 1.61 Lake 8 Multi - Family Residential 22.94 6.13 11.73 17.86 5.08 Lake 9 Multi-Family Residential 19.57 6.55 9.84 16.39 3.18 Lake 10 Multi -Family Residential 40.53 4.01 33.88 37.89 2.64 Lake I1 ® Multi - Family Residential 26.84 2.70 20.13 22.83 4.01 Lake 12 Multi - Family Residential 63.81 15.23 36.12 51.35 12.46 Lake 13 Multi - Family Residential 71.14 12.69 39.53 52.22 18.92 Lake 14 Multi- Family Residential 69.75 16.10 38.09 54.19 15.56 Lake 15 Multi -Family Residential 5.14 2.21 1.75 3.96 1.18 Lake 16 Multi- Family Residential 36.03 8.29 19.08 27.37 8.66 Lake 17 Multi-Family Residential 6.06 2.33 1.88 4.21 1.85 Lake 18 Multi - Family Residential 2539 5.95 13.94 19.89 5.50 Lake 19 Multi -Family Residential 21.99 5.54 11.43 16.97 5.02 Off Site ROWI12 Multi - Family Residential _ 3.10 0.62 2.48 3.10 Total 6161" 148.23 352.13 500.36 116.51 1� Q:2005'950150.O1.n3 HecieMeI.ka MPl "PDRI- F.1[P000'i tnvimmmwml Resnofa Pe�miai SUMe�kt11:M.rppliialion Piapentim�lln�cr Ma�uracm eakulaiiwic RA1220100) -12 Hervov rieq+u we4a 4uelirv.il. 1;152010 PomeeaP w.a Nulyas 5 or26 4:21 PM Basin Planning 'DXX TA INC Visuuiirmkerk C 0 SLl L.TI NC: Civil Fngirtcenskg 1 TL. .a Sur -ymo & Mnttnin/ Gpland C \'aloe Lake I Project Proj. #: Calculated By: JAZ Checked By: JJS HACIENDA LAKES 050150.02.03 Date: 14- Jul -]0 Date: 14-Jul-10 Lake 2 II 1 d Curve Numbe r / Runoff Coefficient 0.513 Lake 3 38.07 ac. 0.545 Lake 4 Land I- Caws! n - UCIA ('N C Valuc 28.10 ac. 0.638 Lake 6 Open Space 80 0.160 11.82 ac. 0.550 Off Site ROW #1 Impervious "8 0.782 17.86 ac. 0.569 Lake 9 Lakes N/A N/A 37.89 ac. 0.716 Basin Upland A. en Gpland C \'aloe Lake I 33?1 ac. 0.551 Lake 2 26.16 ac. 0.513 Lake 3 38.07 ac. 0.545 Lake 4 13.83 ac. 0.530 Lake 5 28.10 ac. 0.638 Lake 6 19.33 ac. 0.625 Lake 7 11.82 ac. 0.550 Off Site ROW #1 1.61 ac. 0.658 Lake 8 17.86 ac. 0.569 Lake 9 16.39 ac. 0.533 Lake 10 37.89 ac. 0.716 Lake 11 22.83 ac. 0.708 Lake 12 51.35 ac. 0.598 Lake 13 52.22 ac. 0.631 Lake 14 54.19 ac. 0.597 Lake 15 3.96 ac. 0.435 Lake 16 27.37 ac. 0.594 Lake 17 4.21 ac. 0.438 Lake I8 19.89 ac. 0.596 Lake 19 16.97 ac. 0.579 Off Site ROW #2 3.10 ac. 0.658 N 0:'2005 050150 02 03 ReeieMe Iskec MI4'D- Dm- FItP000] Fnvimnmwml Ravame.l'ennini SuMask ].2 ERP Arylicatiaa P�en4on H'aier Marermc*t CakuleYa�RN23010 -0] -13 Rarvey Harycr uretaqualin:als 7%15'2010 Poeldevelp load Amlysis 6 426 0:21 PM Annual Runol'1 \`olumes Annual Runoff Vol = Annual Rainfall (in/yr) * Area (ac) * C value * (IfUl2in) Basin Land d l Annual Rainfall Upland A- C Valoe U.N.d RanoR L.ke Ate. Lake Run -oft 1'n01 Run-off ® Lake Lake Multi - Family Residential Multi- Family Residential ,n•53 53 33.21 26.16 0.551 0.513 80.82 59.27 3.48 2.42 1537 10.69 96.19 69.96 Lake 3 Multi - Family Residential 53 38.07 0.545 91.64 9.65 42.62 134.26 Lake 4 Multi -Family Residential 53 13.83 0.530 32.37 3.47 15.33 47.70 Lakes Multi-Family Residential 53 28.10 0.638 79.18 5.61 24.78 103.96 Lake 6 Multi -Family Residential 53 19.33 0.625 53.36 2.95 13.03 66.39 Lake Multi - Family Residential 53 11.82 0.550 28.71 4.87 21.51 50.22 Off Site ROW #I Multi- Family Residential 53 1.61 0.658 4.68 4.68 Lake Multi- Family Residential 53 17.86 0.569 44.88 5.08 22.44 67.32 Lake Multi-Family Residential 53 16.39 0.533 38.58 3.18 14.05 52.63 Lake 10 Multi-Family Residential 53 37.89 0.716 119.82 2.64 11.66 131.48 Lake I1 Multi-Family Residential 53 22.83 0.708 71.39 4.01 17.71 89.10 Lake 12 Multi-Family Residential 53 51.35 0.598 135.62 12.46 55.03 190.65 Lake 13 Multi - Family Residential 53 52.22 0.631 145.53 18.92 83.56 229.09 Lake 14 Multi -Family Residential 53 54.19 0.597 142.89 15.56 68.72 211.61 Lake 15 Multi -Family Residential 53 3.96 0.435 7.61 1.18 5.21 12.82 Lake 16 Multi- Family Residential 53 27.37 0.594 71.81 8.66 38.25 110.06 Lake 17 Multi - Family Residential 53 4.21 0.438 8.14 1.85 8.17 1631 Lake 18 Multi - Family Residential 53 19.89 0.596 52.36 5.50 24.29 76.65 Lake 19 Multi -Family Residential 53 16.97 0.579 43.40 5.02 22.17 65.57 Off Site ROW42 Multi -Family Residential 53 3.10 0.658 9.01 9.01 N 0:'2005 050150 02 03 ReeieMe Iskec MI4'D- Dm- FItP000] Fnvimnmwml Ravame.l'ennini SuMask ].2 ERP Arylicatiaa P�en4on H'aier Marermc*t CakuleYa�RN23010 -0] -13 Rarvey Harycr uretaqualin:als 7%15'2010 Poeldevelp load Amlysis 6 426 0:21 PM LAE J Planning Vlstmli�atica, C CTIV tiI�I_- i -1 \(: CvB Englncrring Z • �L i SiweYina & nt:,pinne Runoff Characteristics "rotas Nitrogen Total Phosphorus Multi Family Residential 2.32 0.52 Post - development Loadinus of TN & TP Project HACIENDA LAKES Proj. 4: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: 4AZ Date: 144.1 -10 Checked By: J4S Date: 14 -Ju1d0 TN load (kg/yr) = Runoff (aoft/yr) " 43,560 ft^2 /ac * 7.48 gaV1113 * 3.785 liter /gal * TN (mg/1) * 10 ^ -6 (kg/mg) TP load (kg/yr) = Runoff (ao-fHyr) * 43,560 f '2/ac " 7.48 gaVftA3 * 3.785 liter /gal * TP (mg/1) * 10 ^ -6 (kg/mg) Basin Land Use Upland Runoff Total Load Total Runoff 1'N TP Lake Multi - Family Residential 80.82 23124 51.83 96.19 Lake 2 Multi- Family Residential 59.27 169.59 38.01 69.96 Lake 3 Multi- Family Residential 91.64 262.19 58.77 134.26 Lake 4 Multi- Family Residential 32.37 92.63 20.76 47.70 Lakes Multi-Family Residential 79.18 226.55 50.78 103.96 Lake Multi- Family Residential 53.36 152.67 34.22 66.39 Lake 7 Multi- Family Residential 28.71 82.15 18.41 50.22 Off Site ROWNI Multi -Family Residential 4.68 13.39 3.00 4.68 Lake 8 Multi- Family Residential 44.88 128.42 28.78 67.32 Lake Multi - Family Residential 38.58 110.39 24.74 52.63 Lake 10 Multi - Family Residential 119.82 342.83 76.84 131.48 Lake 11 Multi -Family Residential 71.39 204.26 45.78 89.10 Lake 12 Multi -Family Residential 135.62 388.04 86.98 190.65 Lake 13 Multi - Family Residential 145.53 416.39 93.33 229.09 Lake 14 Mufti-Family Residential 142.89 408.82 91.63 211.61 Lake 15 Multi -Family Residential 7.61 21.77 4.88 12.82 Lake 16 Multi -Family Residential 71.81 205.45 46.05 110.06 Lake 17 Multi -Family Residential 8.14 23.30 5.22 16.31 Lake 18 Multi -Family Residential 52.36 149.80 33.58 76.65 Lake 19 Multi -Family Residential 43.40 124.16 27.83 65.57 Off Site ROW92 Multi- Family Residential 9.01 25.78 5.78 9.01 Total 3,779.8 847.2 1,835.7 Q: SOaaO5a15a.03.03Ibcieode Iske* MPI;DDRI- ERP'000) Eovimnma�Yl acsmw Pcnnitli� SuMes4'i.} ERI' Application P,epemYw.N'err Ma,ugw�enl ('akvle�imuRA12`3010-0'I -l1 Hmry Wrya wale 4,ielily.rJ.� ]oa dp twdA Iy4 tof26 715 ?ol0 4:31 PM 0 T A INC. Project HACIENDA LAKES DIA T '♦ visuatirgation Calculated j. R: 05Date: 2.03 CONSULTING Gvil Frlginamng Calculated By: JJS Date: 14- Jut -LO j \ T TL J. Sunvying 8: Mapping Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 HACIENDA LAKES Pre - Development vs. Post - Development Analysis Storm Treatment Characteristics of Wel Detention Treatment Lakes Lake Surface Area \lean Depth Volume Maximum Depth Lake 1 3.48 16.00 55.69 20„00 Lake 2 2.42 14.31 34.62 20.00 Lake 3 9.65 17.28 166.74 20.00 Lake 4 3.47 15.53 53.90 20.00 Lake 5 5.61 14.58 81.79 20.00 Lake 6 2.95 14.39 42.46 20.00 Lake 7 4.87 13.92 67.78 20.00 Lake 8 5.08 13.85 70.37 20.00 Lake 9 3.18 13.87 44.11 20.00 Lake 10 2.64 14.67 38.73 20.00 Lake 11 4.01 14.78 59.28 20.00 Lake 12 12.46 18.44 229.72 20.00 Lake 13 18.92 17.02 322.08 20.00 Lake 14 15.56 16.20 252.10 20.00 Lake 15 1.18 11.10 13.10 20.00 Lake 16 8.66 17.14 148.42 20.00 Lake 17 1.85 12.24 22.64 20.00 Lake 18 5.50 16.26 89.44 20.00 Lake 19 5.02 16.88 84.75 20.00 Total 1.877.72 I ealnlent Provided be Lakes Lake Delanion Tim(day)= Volww:(aao-n) /Annual Runoff(aao- 0 /yr)'365day /yr TNR.n l= [43.75 z(Lake Daanion Tinley] /[4.35 +(Lake Dddnion Time)] TP Re-wal = [0.213 x In(Lake Ddduion Tim)'] + [6.372 x In(Lake Ddalli0n Tim)] + 40.13 Basin 1 Lake 1 Lake Ddention Time (day) = 54 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge Basin Run -off l 5 231.2 kg/yr 40.5 137.6 kg/yr I P 51.8 kg/yr 67.2 17.0 kg/yr V olun,c 96.2 acre -1Hyr 96.2 acmft /yr Lake 2 Discharge (100 %) 1 N 223.1 kg /yr 40.5 132.7 kg/yr I P 19.4 kg /yr 67.2 6.4 kg/yr Volume 282.4 acre -fv r 282.4 aae-ff/yr Total TN 454.3 kg/yr 40.5 270.3 kg/yr IT 71.3 kgA r 67.2 23.4 kg /yr Volume 378.6 acre -fthr 378. acre -ftAr Q:1200nM150.02.03 aaumdaUU MPl'UDRI -ER oroJ Emimmdw [R-- Pamillir,\SU14ask7.2 ERP APPIia0em Prelmntioii ,l \eler \furgemml CalcWe IRA1212010 -07 -12 li. ry ?/15/2010 S-Trt 8 d26 4:21 PM U DAVAPlanning I.r VASUaII]aIMNr N ti U 1. -( -ING evil F�lginnving AL �. V ♦ j Z Sur T., .@ Mappine Lake 2 Lake Detention Tlmc (day) = 45 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge TP 58.8 kg /yr 71.4 16.8 kg/yr Basin Run -off T\ 169.6 kg /yr 39.8 102.1 kg/yr 111 38.0 kg%yr 66.0 12.9 kg /yr Volume 70.0acre -ft ?r 71.4 70.0acre -ftv, Lake 3 Discharge (100 %) TN 201.0 kg /yr 39.8 121.0 kg/yr TP 19.2 kg/yr 66.0 6.5 kg/yr Volume 212.4 tae -flyr 71.4 212.4 acre - flyr Total TN 370.6 kg/yr 39.8 223.1 kg/yr TP 57.2 kg /yr 66.0 19.4 kg/yr Volmne 282.4 acre -11A r 282.4 acre -ft/vr Lake 3 Lake Daemon Tine(dav)= 100 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge Basin Run -off TN 262.2 kg /yr 41.9 152.3 kg /yr TP 58.8 kg /yr 71.4 16.8 kg/yr Volume 134.3 acre -ft /yr 41.9 134.3 acre -ft /)r Lake 5 Discharge (50 %) TN 83.7 kg/yr 41.9 48.6 kg/yr TP 8.2 kg/yr 71.4 2.4 kg/yr Volume 78.2 acre -fP r 41.9 78.2 acre -ft /yr Total TN 345.9 kg /vr 41.9 201.0 kg) r TP 67.0 kg/yr 71.4 19.2 kg /yr Volume 212.4 acre - ftlyr 41.9 212.4 acre-ft/vr Lake 4 Lake DUauion Time (day) = 100 days Project HACIENDA LAKES Proj. #: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 Checked By: JJS Date: 14 -Jul-10 Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge 1P 50.8 kg/yr 71.4 14.5 kg /yr Basin Run -off 1\ 92.6 kg/yr 41.9 53.8 kg/yr I P 20.8 kg /yr 71.4 5.9 kg /y, Vnlume 47.7 acre -ft /yr 71.4 47.7 acre -ft 'e' Off Site ROW #1 Run -off 1\ 13.4 kg /yr 41.9 7.8 kg/y, 'TP 3.0 kg /yr 71.4 0.9 kg /yr Velunle 4.7 acre -8/vr 71.4 4.7 acre -R',, Total TN 106.0 kgh r 41.9 61.6 kg/yr TP 23.8 kg/yr 71.4 6.8 kg/yr N olume 52.4 acre -fl/) r 52.4 acre -ft/,, Lake 5 Lake Daention Time, (day) 100 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge h,11111 PUB I 226.6 kg/yr 41.9 131.6 kg/yr 1P 50.8 kg/yr 71.4 14.5 kg /yr Vnlume 104.0 acre -flyr 104.0 acre -ft/p lake 4 D-ha,, i l un °, 61.6 kg/yr 41.9 35.8 kg /yr 1 P 6.8 kg /yr 71.4 1.9 kg/yr Volume 52.4 acre -f /yr 52.4 acre -h /}T Total l _N 288.1 kghr 41.9 167.4 kg/yr TP 57.6 kg/yr 71.4 16.5 kg/yr Volume 156.3 acre -ft/yr 156.3 acre -ftlyr t2:\Sm5`U50150.02.0 ?Ibex "l-WUr DRI- FRP\0007 Emin11re RemUrrx Pemunisp\SUble.k 12 FRY AM[i ®bill Prelureiio \\'abr Ntaregnnrnt C'kWeiio,s 12\ 2010 -07 -12 Hervey flamer water q-tity. als abrm Treat. 9 nr 26 7/IN2010 4:21 PNt DA"X IA" \tNC Project HACIENDA LAKES Planning Proj. 8: 050150.02.03 Visualiranicat Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14-Jul -10 f + N 5 U k -'I'1 N C7 CSvil Esginrrn'n8 Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 AL %. T TA a Survevi 9.1 M Malxsin¢ Lake 6 Lake Daunion Time (day) = 100 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge Basin Run -off TN 152.7 kgiyr 41.9 88.7 kg/yr TP 34.2 kg /yr 71.4 9.8 kg/yr Volume 66.4 acre -fthT 41.9 66.4 acre-@/yr Lake 5 Discharge (5W' TN 83.7 kg -}T 41.9 48.6 kg/yr TP 8.2 kg /yr 71.4 2.4 kg/yr Volume 78.2 acre-ft/yr 419 78.2 acre -ft /yr Total TN 2236.4 kg/yr 41.9 137.3 kg /rr TP 42.5 kghT 71.4 12.1 kghr N olume 144.6 acre -ft /cr 41.9 144.6 acre -ft/A r Lake 7 LakeDetention Time W-Y) I'll) Ja's Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge Basin Run- oRl-lotal TN 128.4 kgt.vr 41.9 Basin Run-off TN 82.2 kg/yr 41.9 47.7 kg/yr TP 18.4 kg/yr 71.4 5.3 kg /yr Vohune 50.2 acre-lVvr 50.2 acre -ft /yr Lake 6 Discharge t I 00 "0 TN 137.3 kg /yr 419 79.8 kg/yr TP 12.1 kg /yr 71.4 3.5 kg /yr Volume 144.6 acre-B/yr 1446 acre -ft/yr Total TN 219.5 kg/yr 41.9 127.5 kg/yr TP 30.6 kWyr 71.4 8.74 kg/yr Volume 194.8 acre -ft/yr 194.8 acre -ft/yr Lake 8 Lake Detention Time (day) = 100 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge Basin Run- oRl-lotal TN 128.4 kgt.vr 41.9 74.6 kg/yr TP 28.8 kg/yr 71.4 8.2 kg/yr Volume 67.3 acre -ft/yr 67.3 acre -Nyr Q:\2005'050150.02.03 He ede I<tes MPI'D- DRI- ERPWW7 Emvo." R Pe Wu \SWwe 7.2 ERP Appli.6 -Prt .iod.l\ w, 1Lreg.' CekWatio.\ UZQ01 W -12 He HIWI.I.wl q"iy.xla Slam Tres Inof26 7/152010 4:21 PM Lake DNwuion Timc(day)= 100 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Remora1 Discharge Basin Run- off/Total TN 110.4 kg/yr 41.4 64.1 k„h r TP 24.7 kg/yr 71.4 7.1 kghr Volume 52.6 acre -fthr 52.6 acre -fi /rr Lake 10 Lakc Detunion Timc(day)= 100 days Inputs Parameter Planning Removal Visualixatirar I P bNSULTINr`i CSvil Enginaving 71.0 � � �L Z Ssuvevina & Mutlotne Basin Run -off TN Lake 9 Lake DNwuion Timc(day)= 100 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Remora1 Discharge Basin Run- off/Total TN 110.4 kg/yr 41.4 64.1 k„h r TP 24.7 kg/yr 71.4 7.1 kghr Volume 52.6 acre -fthr 52.6 acre -fi /rr Lake 10 Lakc Detunion Timc(day)= 100 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge I P 45.8 kg /yr 71.0 13.3 kg/yr Basin Run -off TN 342.8 kg /yr 41.9 199.2 kg/yr TP 76.8 kg /yr 71.4 22.0 kg/yr Volume 131.5 acre -ft /yr 71.0 131.5 acre -ft/yr Offske ROW #2 Run -off TN 25.8 kg /yr 41.9 15.0 kg/yr TP 5.8 kg /yr 71.4 1.7 kg /yr Volume 9.0 acre -ft/vr 71.0 9.0 acre -fUyr Total TN 368.6 kg/yr 41.9 214.2 kg/yr TP 82.6 kglyr 71.4 23.63 kg/yr Volume 140.5 acre-ft/ r 140.5 acre -fl /yr Lake 11 Lake Detenion Time (day) 94 da" Inputs Parameter Inputs Rrmoc;d Discharge Project HACIENDA LAKES Prej. #: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 Basin Run -off TN 204.3 kg/yr 41.8 118.9 kg/yr I P 45.8 kg /yr 71.0 13.3 kg/yr Volume 89.1 acre -fUyr 89.1 acre -ft/yr Lake 10 Discharge (100 %) TN 214.2 kg /yr 41.8 124.6 kg/yr I P 23.6 kglyr 71.0 6.9 kg/yr Volume 140.5 acre -ft lvr 140.5 acre -Lw Total TN 418.4 kg /) r 41.8 243.5 kg/yr TP 69.4 kg/yr 71.0 20.13 kg/yr N olumr 229.6 acre -ft/vr 229.6 acraft/vr Q:\2005`a50150.02.01 Haderde lakes Aa 'rT)DRI- ERPDDO]F iloivmeel Re.sxwce eervliniig \SOdask l.2 FR1'.41TlicaaonY }unlion \ \i'aler Meregemnn fakWaaoreVtAl2�' 010.01 -12 Harvey tlerper x- ecer9�iry.alc s-Tree. 11 of 26 711/2010 4:21 - D`\ TA IBC' Project HACIENDA LAKES \� / J Vii smaliilxm . Calculated j. #: 05D W.02.03 (.,'0 N S LI L-1- I N (3 Civil Fngnteermg Calculated By: JJS Date: 14- Ju1-10 .A 1 T V1 .a Sur -vine & Mapping Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 Lake 12 Lake Delen6on Time(day)= 73 dos, Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge Basin Run -off 1 388.0 kg/yr 41.3 227.8 kg /yr Lake 11' 87.0 kg/yr 69.3 26.7 kg /yr I put, Volume 19M acre -ftivr Removal 190.7 acre - ftyr Lake I? Discharge ( Iu0 "I,) I N 552.4 kg/yr 41.3 324.3 kg/yr Volume T P 40.5 kg/yr 69.3 12.4 kg/yr 500.7 kgkr Volume 938.9 acre - ft/vi TP 938.9 aa�Povr Lake I Discharge I00,. ", 1N 12.6 kg)r 41.3 7.4 kg p 337.8 acre-ft /rr TP 1.4 kg/yr 693 0.4 kg/yr Volume 12.8 acre-0/yr 12.8 aae-ftya Total TN 953.1 kgkr 413 559.5 kgicr Lake 14 Discharge (100 %) IF 128.9 kg,'), 693 39.6kg/yr Volumr 1,142.4 acre41,vr 71.4 1,142.4 acre -ft/%r 0 Lake 14 Lake Detention Tim (day) = 100 days Inputs Parameter TnDUts Removal Discharge Basin Rim -off I N Lake 13 41.9 237.5 kg/yr I Lake Detention Tune (day) 100 days Volume 211.6 acre -ft/yr I put, Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge Basin Run-oT TN 416.4 kggT 41.9 241.9 kg/yr Volume TP 93.3 kg/yr 71.4 26.7 kg /yr 500.7 kgkr Volume 229.1 acre -ft6T TP 229.1 acre - ft/yr Lake l l Discharge (100"0 TN 243.5 kg/yr 41.9 141.5 kg/yr 337.8 acre-ft /rr TP 20.1 kg/yr 71A 5.8 kg/yr Volume 229.6 acre -LVyr 229.6 aae-ft/yr Lake 14 Discharge (100 %) TN 290.9 kg/yr 419 169.0 kg/yr TP 28.3 kg/yr 71.4 8.1 kg/yr Volume 337.8 acre - ft/yr 337.8 acre - ft/yr Lake 17 Discharge (100 %) TN 68.3 kg/yr 41.9 39.7 kg/yr TP 4.0 kg /yr 71.4 L I kg/ye Volume 142.5 acre - ft/yr 142.5 acre-ft/yr Total TN 1,019.1 kgh r 41.9 552A kg/yr TP 145.7 kg /vr 71.4 40.53 kg/yr Volume 938.9 acre -flhr 938.9 acre -fthr 0 Lake 14 Lake Detention Tim (day) = 100 days Inputs Parameter TnDUts Removal Discharge Basin Rim -off I N 408.8 kg/yr 41.9 237.5 kg/yr I 91.6 kg/yr 71.4 26.2 kg/yr Volume 211.6 acre -ft/yr 211.6 acre - ft/yr Lake 18 Discharge (50 %) TN 91.9 kg/yr 41.9 53.4 kg/yr TP 7.2 kg/yr 71.4 2.0 kg/yr Volume 126.1aci 11,1 126.1 acneft/yr Total TN 500.7 kgkr 41.9 290.9 kg/yr TP 98.8 kg,',, 71.4 28.3 kg /yr No unle 337.8 kg',, 337.8 acre-ft /rr alzoosbwl5a.a2.a? Hadada lopes MPI.'RDRI- I:RP10007 F.mwmm�tel Rew +wx Pmrvni�� \SWvssk 7.2 LRP Appliwtiun Prtyvntii+n \ \ \'e+m M1feregemrnt fekvlaUOmW 1212010.0'1 -12 nervry HeO+a water ywlily.xls 71152010 S-Treat 12 of2s 4:21 PM T, J TA iV�. Project HACIENDA LAKES K XX / / Viaiwlniation . Calculated B : 05Date: 2.03 C Q r " I I I I Ni Ca Civil Errglrlccnrag Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14JW -10 = t v V.A. i so-"ink MatNaine Checked By: JJS Date: 14 -JW -10 Lake 15 Lake Delc pion Time (day) = 100 days Inputs Parameter inputs Remoral Discharge BasinRwl- offlota1 TN 21.8kg /cr 41.9 12.6 kg/yr 1 P 4.9 kghr 71.4 1.4 kg/yr Volume 12.8 acre -1'Ucr 12.8acre -flhr Lalke 16 Lake Dctc lion Till. (day) 100 days Input, Parameter Inputs Rrmocal Discharge Basin Run-off/Total TN 205.4 kg/yr 41.9 119.4 kg/yr TP 46.0 kg/yr 71.4 13.2 kg/yr Volume 110.1 acre-ft/yr 110.1 acre -Poyr Lake 17 Lake Draavion Till. (&y) days Inputs Parameter Inputs Rrmocal Discharge Basin Run -off TN 23.3 kg /yr 40.7 13.8 kg/yr TP 5.2 kg/yr 67.7 1.7 kg/yr Volume 16.3 acre -ft/yr 16.3 acre -ft/yr Lake I8 Discharge (50 "0) TN 91.9 kg/yr 40.7 54.5 kg/yr TP 7.2 kg/yr 67.7 2.3 kg/yr Volume 126.1 acre -ft/yr 6.6 kg/yr 126.1 acro-Wyr Total TN 115.2 kg/yr 40.7 68.3 kg/yr TP 12.4 kg/yr 67.7 4.0 kg/yr Volume 142.5 acre -ft/cr 62.1 kg/yr 142 acre -ftkr Lake 18 Lake Detention Thm(day)= 100 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge Basin Kun -nlT TN 149.8 kg /yr 41.9 87.0 kg/yr TP 33.6 kg/yr 71A 9.6 kg/yr Volume 76.7 acre -ft/ yt' 76.7 acre -Wye Lake 16 Discharge (50 %) TN 59.7 kg/yr 41.9 34.7 kg/yr I 6.6 kg/yr 71 4 1.9 kg /yr Volume 55.0 acre -Wye 55.O acre -Wye Lake 19 Discharge (100 %) P, 106.8 kg/yr 41.9 62.1 kg/yr TP 9.8 kg/yr 71.4 2.8 kg/yr Volume 120.6 acre -Wvr 120.6 acre -Wyr Total TN 316.3 kg /yr 41.9 183.8 kg/yr TP 50.0 kg /yr 71.4 14.3 kg/yr V'olumr 252.3 acre -1'Ikr 2523 acre -ft/vr Q:\?005'U50150.0�.0? lieiiaxle ]ekes M1iPItD- DRI- ERP\0007 Einiiormialel Reunnva PamWr�45utwa4:7.2 ERP APPIia4on Pieperalion \ \Ya4r M1fewgmrn� CekWetiore\RAl_'�\- '010.07 -12 Hervry Hama xeNr gwliry.xls Storm T- 13 426 7115/2010 4:21 PM C Planning Visuulizaticm C' )NSLI I_UINCi GAIEitrit —ing j t T TA ML Su,e in¢ & Mapnina Lake 19 Lake Detenion Time (day) = 100 days Inputs Parameter Inputs Removal Discharge Basin Run -off I N 124.2 kg \}T 41.9 72.1 kg/yr "IP 27.8 kg /yr 71.4 8.0 kg/yr Volume 65.6 acre -ft -cr 65.6age -fi/yr Lake 16 Discharge (50 %) TN 59.7 kg/yr 41.9 34.7 kg/yr TP 6.6 kg/yr 71.4 1.9 kg/yr Volume 55.0 acre -ft/yr 55.0 acre -ft /yr Total TN 183.8 kgyr 41.9 106.8 kg/vr TIP 34.4 kg/yr 71.4 9.84 kg/yr Volume 120.6 acre -fUvr 120.6 acraftivr Compare Pre- and Post- development Loading Project HACIENDA LAKES Proj. #: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14 -JuI40 Checked By: JJS Date: 14 -Jul-10 Parameter I'redecclopment Post- den•lopmenl 1 \ 1,990.0 kg /yr 1,096.1 kg/yr I I' 95.2 kg/, 87.0 kg/yr V plume 1,403.1 acre- I'1 /vr I,835.7 acre -Clkr QXI.005'A50150.02.03 Had lake. WUD- DR]- F.RP\0007 Emji ., Re.. Penalai,g \StihusA 7.2 ERP A1ryliu1„n 1'mpention\ \rater kb g� Ca WeW,\RA12\2010-07- 12 Hervey 11rye W, quelity.ds S— T— 14 4 M we �01 Planning VXXTA Visualizatirat CONSUL T I N G Civil FirgutectinE AL %. T IL 1 Survavhw & MatmimR Evaluate Depth of Pond Anoxia Project HACIENDA LAKES Proj. N: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 Mean TP cone. in discharge (mg9) = Annual TP dis. (kg/yr)* ac/43560 ftA2* W3/7.48 gal* gal/3.785L* I OA6 mg/kg /Annual Vol dis. (ac -ft/yr) Mean Chyl -a cony (mg /mA3) = log (chyl -a) = 1.449 log (mean TP) - 1.136 Mean Secehi Disk SD depth (m) = 8.7 (1 /(1 +0.47 chyi -a)) Depth of DO (m) = 2.3893 * Seechi + 0.5749 * In (chyl -a) - 0.0113 *mean TP Recommendations 1. The proposed system provides adequate water quality treatment and the discharge of the system is below the predevelopment loads. 2. Lake Aeration is needed on all lakes except Lake 17. Q:12005050150.02.03 Hede Lakes WITD-DRI- E1nM1007 EWi 11 del Reurww Pm�uui�lSnbesk'l.2IiRP Appliuuon P�c{amtion�\ \ever Menga�cni t'ekWntio�rcVN1:�20160'i -1? Ilervry Helper wekr quelity.�s 71152010 almm TIwL 15 of M 4:31 PM Annual TP Annual Volume Mean TP Mean Chyl - a Mean Secchi Depth of Anoxia Mean Depth of Aeration Lake Discharge Discharge Concentration Concentration Disk Depth _ _ Lake 'Veeded7 Lake 1 23.38 378.58 50.07 21.22 0.79 3.09 10.12 16.110 Yes Lake 2 19.44 282.39 55.82 24.83 0.69 2.86 9.37 14.31 Yes Lake 3 19.16 212.43 73.14 36.74 0.48 2.38 7.82 17.28 Yes Lake 4 6.80 52.38 105.20 62.22 0.29 1.87 6.15 15.53 Yes Lake 5 16.47 156.34 85.40 45.99 0.38 2.16 7.07 .14.58 Yes Lake 6 12.14 144.56 68.10 33.13 0.52 2.50 8.19 14.39 Yes Lake 7 8.74 194.78 36.38 13.36 1.20 3.94 12.91 13.92 Yes Lake 8 8.23 67.32 99.15 57.10 0.31 1.95 6.40 13.85 Yes Lake 9 7.08 52.63 109.03 65.52 0.27 1.83 5.99 13.87 Yes Lake 10 23.63 140.49 136.38 90.62 0.20 1.53 5.01 14.67 Yes Lake 11 20.13 229.59 71.09 35.26 0.50 2.43 7.97 14.78 Yes Lake 12 39.57 1142.35 28.09 9.18 1.64 4.87 15.97 18.44 Yes Lake 13 40.53 938.88 35.00 12.63 1.25 4.06 13.32 17.02 Yes Lake 14 28.25 337.75 67.83 32.94 0.53 2.50 8.21 16.20 Yes Lake 15 1.40 12.82 88.26 48.24 0.37 2.11 6.92 11.10 Yes Lake 16 13.17 110.06 97.03 5534 0.32 1.98 6.50 17.14 Yes Lake 17 4.00 142.45 22.75 6.76 2.08 5.82 19.08 12.24 No Lake 18 14.30 252.28 45.97 18.74 0.89 3.28 10.78 16.26 Yes Lake 19 9.84 120.60 66.18 31.78 0.55 2.54 8.35 16.88 Yes Recommendations 1. The proposed system provides adequate water quality treatment and the discharge of the system is below the predevelopment loads. 2. Lake Aeration is needed on all lakes except Lake 17. Q:12005050150.02.03 Hede Lakes WITD-DRI- E1nM1007 EWi 11 del Reurww Pm�uui�lSnbesk'l.2IiRP Appliuuon P�c{amtion�\ \ever Menga�cni t'ekWntio�rcVN1:�20160'i -1? Ilervry Helper wekr quelity.�s 71152010 almm TIwL 15 of M 4:31 PM V X / - f I -INC. Planning Visualization CONS U L'I'l N G Civil Engineering AL %. 1 TA Z Surveying & MaM)i tg HACIENDA LAKES Lake Volumes Project HACIENDA LAKES Proj. #: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14-Jul-10 Checked By: JJS Date: 14-Jul-10 U Q:�2005 \050150.02.03Ha6enda lakes WUD-DR7- ERP\0007 En�4mnmenal Rusiwrw Permuting \Sub -1, 7.2 ERP Applirntinn Preparation\WaterMwge tCalmlati- , \RAM2010 -07 -12 Denrey llarr� ata qualily. *Is 7/15/2010 lake Vol. 16 of 26 4 .21 PM Lake Number: Lake I Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 163,350 sf. 3.75 Control Elevation 10.00 151,589 sf. 3.48 Slope Break 0.00 97,574 sf. 2.24 Toe of Slope -10.00 74,488 sf 1.71 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volurne Top of Bank 163,350 sf. 130,462 sf. x 12.00 = 1,565,546 cf. / 43560 = 35.9 acre-ft Slope Break 97,574 sf. Slope Break 97,574 sf. 86,031 sf. x 10.00 860,310 cf. /43560= 19.8 acre -ft Toe of Slope 74,488 sf. Total: $5.7-7,771 Lake Number: Lake 2 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 116,305 sf. 2.67 Control Elevation 10.00 105,415 sf. 2.42 Slope Break 0.00 56,628 sf. 1.30 Toe of Slope -10.00 37,462 sf. 0.86 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 116,305 sf. 86,467 sf. x 12.00 = 1,037,599 cf. / 43560 = 23.8 acre -ft Slope Break 56,628 sf. Slope Break 56,628 sf. 47,045 sf. x 10.00 = 470,448 cf. /43560 -- 10.8 acre -ft Toe of Slope 37.462 sf. Total: 34.6 acre -ft Lake Number: Lake Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 444,748 sf 10.21 Control Elevation 10.00 420,354 sf. 9.65 Slope Break 0.00 304,049 sf. 6.98 Toe of Slope -10.00 250,034 sf. 5.74 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 444,748 sf. 374,398 sf. x 12.00 = 4,492,778 cf. / 43560 = 103.1 acre-ft Slope Break 304,049 sf. Slope Break 304,049 sf. 277,042 sf. x 10.00 = 2,770,416 cf. /43560- 63.6 acre -ft Toe of Slope 250.034 sf. Total: 1669 acre -ft U Q:�2005 \050150.02.03Ha6enda lakes WUD-DR7- ERP\0007 En�4mnmenal Rusiwrw Permuting \Sub -1, 7.2 ERP Applirntinn Preparation\WaterMwge tCalmlati- , \RAM2010 -07 -12 Denrey llarr� ata qualily. *Is 7/15/2010 lake Vol. 16 of 26 4 .21 PM N Q:\ 2005 \050150.02.0311.6.de Lakes Meta- DRI- ERP\0007 I -i-tal Resource11mi1fip\ SuMask72ERP Application PreparatiomW .1,Mamg- ,(:.Ic.latlooe\RAl2 \2 010- 07- 12neneylbrpaw.,t q-1i,y.cls 7/1520/0 lake Vol. 17 or26 4 :^ -1 PM INC. 1'►unning Visualization AON S U L'I'I NO Civil Engineering t ♦ Tj Z Surveying MupptnR Lake Number: Lake 4 Elevation Area Top of Bank 12.00 163,786 sf. Control Elevation 10.00 151,153 sf. Slope Break 0.00 93,218 sf. Toe of Slope -10.00 67,954 sf. Area Avg Top of Bank 163,786 sf. 128,502 sf. Slope Break 93,218 sf. Slope Break 93,218 sf. 80,586 sf. Toe of Sloe 67.954 sf. Acreage 3.76 3.47 2.14 1.56 x x Depth 12.00 = 10.00 = Project Proj. #: Calculated By: Checked By: Volume 1,542,024 cf. 805,860 cf. JAZ JJS / 43560 = / 43560 = HACIENDA LAKES 050150.02.03 Date: 14- Jul -10 Date: 14- Jul -10 Volume 35.4 acre -ft 18.5 acre -ft Total: Lake Number: Lake 5 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 266,587 sf. 6.12 Control Elevation 10.00 244,372 sf. 5.61 Slope Break 0.00 138,085 sf. 3.17 Toe of Slope -10.00 88,862 sf. 2.04 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 266,587 sf. 202,336 sf. x 12.00 = 2,428,034 cf. / 43560 = 55.7 acre -ft Slope Break 138,085 sf. Slope Break 138,085 sf. 113,474 sf. I lu_un 1.134.738 cf. /43560 26.1 acre -ft Toe of Sloe 88.862 sf. ® Total: Lake Number. Lake Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 141,134 sf. 3.24 Control Elevation 10.00 128,502 sf. 2.95 Slope Break 0.00 70,567 sf. 1.62 Toe of Slope -10.00 45,302 sf. 1.04 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 141,134 sf. 105,851 sf. x 12.00 = 1,270,210 cf. / 43560 = 29.2 acre-ft Slope Break 70,567 sf. Slope Break 70,567 sf. 57,935 sf. x 10.00 = 579,348 cf. / 43560 = 13.3 acre -ft Toe of Sloe 45,302 sf. Total Lake Number: Lake 7 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 212,137 sf. 4.87 Control Elevation 10.00 212,137 sf. 4.87 Slope Break 0.00 118,048 sf. 2.71 Toe of Slope -10.00 76,230 sf. 1.75 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 212,137 sf. 165,092 sf. x 12.00 = 1,981,109 cf. /43560= 45.5 acre -ft Slope Break 118,048 sf. Slope Break 118,048 sf. 97,139 sf. x 10.00 = 971,388 cf. / 43560 = 22.3 acre -ti Toe of Slope 76,230 sf. Total: N Q:\ 2005 \050150.02.0311.6.de Lakes Meta- DRI- ERP\0007 I -i-tal Resource11mi1fip\ SuMask72ERP Application PreparatiomW .1,Mamg- ,(:.Ic.latlooe\RAl2 \2 010- 07- 12neneylbrpaw.,t q-1i,y.cls 7/1520/0 lake Vol. 17 or26 4 :^ -1 PM N Lake Number: INC. Planning Project Proj. #: HACIENDA LAKES 050150.02.03 Area Visualization Top of Bank Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 Control Elevation CONS U L'l'1 N(; Civil Engineering .AL L V T L i Surveying R Mupping 138,521 sf. Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 71,874 sf. Lake Number: Lake 8 Toe of Slope -10.00 42,689 sf. 0.98 Elevation Area Acreage Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 152,896 sf. Top of Bank 12.00 243,500 sf. 5.59 Depth 112,385 sf, x 12.00 = 1,348,618 cf. / 43560 = 31.0 acre -ft Slope Break Control Elevation 10.00 221,285 sf. 5.08 Slope Break 71,874 sf. 95,396 sf. Slope Break 0.00 116,741 sf. 2.68 Slope Break 57,281 sf. x 10.00 = 572,814 cf. / 43560 = 13.2 acre -ft Toe of Slone Toe of Slope -10.00 64,033 sf 1.47 64,469 sf. Area Avg. Depth Volume x 10.00 = Volume_ Toe of Sloe Top of Bank 243,500 sf. Total: 180,121 sf. x 12.00 = 2,161,447 cf. /43560- 49.6 acre -ft Slope Break 116,741 sf Slope Break 116,741 sf. 90,387 sf. x 10.00 = 903,870 cf. /43560- 20.8 acre -ft Toe of Slope 64,033 sf. Total: L 704 icre-ft N Lake Number: Lake 9 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 152,896 sf. 3.51 Control Elevation 10.00 138,521 sf. 3.18 Slope Break 0.00 71,874 sf. 1.65 Toe of Slope -10.00 42,689 sf. 0.98 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 152,896 sf. Area Avg Depth 112,385 sf, x 12.00 = 1,348,618 cf. / 43560 = 31.0 acre -ft Slope Break 71,874 sf. Slope Break 71,874 sf. 95,396 sf. x 12.00 = 1,144,757 cf. /43560= 26.3 acre -ft Slope Break 57,281 sf. x 10.00 = 572,814 cf. / 43560 = 13.2 acre -ft Toe of Slone 42,689 sf. _ 64,469 sf. Total Lake Number: Lake 10 Elevation Elevation Area Acreage 12.00 Top of Bank 12.00 126,324 sf. 2.90 174,676 sf. Control Elevation 10.00 114,998 sf. 2.64 2.30 Slope Break 0.00 64,469 sf. 1.48 Toe of Slope -10.00 43,996 sf. 1.01 190,793 sf. Area Avg Depth Volmne Volume Top of Bank 126,324 sf. 100,188 sf. Slope Break 100,188 sf. 95,396 sf. x 12.00 = 1,144,757 cf. /43560= 26.3 acre -ft Slope Break 64,469 sf. x 10.00 = 836,352 cf. / 43560 = 19.2 acre -ft Toe of Slope 67,082 sf. Slope Break 64,469 sf. 54,232 sf. x 10.00 = 542.322 cf. /43560- I21 aac -ti Toe of Sloe 43,996 sf. Total: 38.7 acre -k Lake Number: Lake 11 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 190,793 sf. 4.38 Control Elevation 10.00 174,676 sf. 4.01 Slope Break 0.00 100,188 sf. 2.30 Toe of Slope -10.00 67,082 sf. 1.54 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 190,793 sf. 145,490 sf. x 12.00 = 1,745,885 cf. / 43560 = 40.1 acre -ft Slope Break 100,188 sf. Slope Break 100,188 sf. 83,635 sf. x 10.00 = 836,352 cf. / 43560 = 19.2 acre -ft Toe of Slope 67,082 sf. Total Q: \200AOS0150.02.03 naciatda lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP,0007 Em1mn lal R -Pe itting\Subtask 7.2 EPP AppliotimpMwaii,, \Wat�r Matutge=,it('alcuatim.,\RAQ\ 2010- 07- 12Nanyliq-tt teryuality.xls 715/2010 LA. Vol. 18 of 26 4 :21 PM Lake Number: C. Planning Project Proj. #: HACIENDA LAKES 050150.02.03 FMA Visualization Calculated By: JAZ Dale: 14- Jul -10 12.00 Civeg Staveying &Mapping Checked By: JJS Date: 14Ju1 -]0 Lake Number: Lake 12 Lake 1 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 566,716 sf. 13.01 Control Elevation 10.00 542,758 sf. 12.46 Slope Break 0.00 429,502 sf. 9.86 Toe of Slope -10.00 376,358 sf. 8.64 13.44 Area Avg Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 566,716 sf. Area Avg 498,109 sf. x 12.00 = 5,977,303 cf. / 43560 = 137.2 acre -ft Slope Break 429,502 sf. Slope Break 429,502 sf. 729,194 sf. x 12.00 = 8,750,333 cf. / 43560 = 200.9 acre -ft 402,930 sf. x 10.00 = 4,029,300 cf. / 43560 = 92.5 acre -fl Toe of Slone 376,358 sf. Slope Break Total DO] Lake Number: Lake Number: Lake 1 Elevation Area Elevation Area Acreage 724,838 sf. Top of Bank 12.00 872,942 sf. 20.04 15.56 Control Elevation 10.00 824,155 sf. 18.92 Toe of Slope Slope Break 0.00 585,446 sf. 13.44 Area Toe of Slope -10.00 470,448 sf. 10.80 Area Avg Depth Volume Volume x 12.00 = 7.043,652 cf. / 43560 = 161.7 acre-ft Top of Bank 872,942 sf. Slope Break 449,104 sf. 729,194 sf. x 12.00 = 8,750,333 cf. / 43560 = 200.9 acre -ft Slope Break 585,446 sf. Toe of Slone 338.461 sf. Slope Break 585,446 sf. 527,947 sf, x 10.00 = 5,279,472 c£ / 43560 = 121.2 acre -ft Toe of Sloe 470,448 sf. dotal: DO] Lake Number: Lake 14 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 724,838 sf. 16.64 Control Elevation 10.00 677,794 sf. 15.56 Slope Break 0.00 449,104 sf. 10.31 Toe of Slope -10.00 338,461 sf. 7.77 Area AV g. Depth Volume Volwne Top of Bank 724,838 sf. 586,971 sf. x 12.00 = 7.043,652 cf. / 43560 = 161.7 acre-ft Slope Break 449,104 sf. Slope Break 449,104 sf. 393,782 sf. x 10.00 = 3.937,834 cf. /43560- 90.4 acre-ft Toe of Slone 338.461 sf. Total Lake Number: Lake 15 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 59,677 sf. 1.37 Control Elevation 10.00 51,401 sf. 1.18 Slope Break 0.00 16,553 sf. 0.38 Toe of Slope -10.00 6,098 sf. 0.14 Area Avg. Avg, Volwne D�th Volume Volume Top of Bank 59,677 sf. 38,115 sf, x 12.00 = 457,380 cf. / 43560 = 10.5 acre -ft Slope Break 16,553 sf. Slope Break 16,553 sf. 11,326 sf. x 10.00 = 113,256 cf. / 43560 = 2.6 acre-ft Toe of Slone 6.098 sf. Total Q:\2005\ 050150.02.03 Hecietda la&s NWUIIDRI- ERP\00(17 E-i.-e W Resource P- ttuig`Su Mask? 2 ERP Application Preparati,m \Water Menegement 01culati -RA12 \2010 -07 -12 H.-, Nxp', rater yualily,As 7/15/1010 LA. Vol. 19 of 26 4 21 PM �01 Q: \2005\050150.02.0311ao.&lakes MPI1D- DRFERP,0007 Em+mnnxanal Resource PTnm fling\SubW.,k7.2ERP Application Pmpa ai,,f,W- Manege-t CxlculatimsWV? \2010- 07- 1211ency ilarpt. Ovate gwiity.cly 7/15/2010 lake Vol. 20 of 26 4:21 PM Planning ��� T�INC. Project Proj. #: HACIENDA LAKES 050150.02.03 Visualization Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 c c 1 ^. `: 1 1 V i N Ci Civil Engim�ering T ♦ l 1 surveyin1; & MatM/na Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 Lake Number: Lake 16 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 399,881 sf. 9.18 Control Elevation 10.00 377,230 sf. 8.66 Slope Break 0.00 269,636 s£ 6.19 Toe of Slope -10.00 219,978 sf. 5.05 Area Avg.- Depth Volume Volwne Top of Bank 399,881 sf. 334,759 sf. x 12.00 = 4,017,103 cf. / 43560 = 92.2 acre -ft Slope Break 269,636 sf. Slope Break 269,636 sf. 244,807 sf. x 10.00 = 2,448,072 cf. / 43560 = 56.2 acre -ft Toe of Sloe 219,978 sf. Total: Lake Number: Lake 17 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 91,040 s£ 2.09 Control Elevation 10.00 80,586 s£ 1.85 Slope Break 0.00 32,670 sf. 0.75 Toe of Slope -10.00 16,117 s£ 0.37 Area Avg Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 91,040 sf. 61,855 sf. x 12.00 = 742,262 cf. / 43560 = 17.0 acre -ft Slope Break 32,670 sf. Slope Break 32,670 sf. 24,394 sf. x 10.00 = 243,936 cf. /43560- 5.6 acre -ft Toe of SloM 16,117 sf. ® Total: Lake Number: Lake 18 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 257,004 s£ 5.90 Control Elevation 10.00 239,580 s£ 5.50 Slope Break 0.00 158,558 sf. 3.64 Toe of Slope -10.00 121,968 sf. 2.80 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 257,004 sf. 207,781 sf. x 12.00 = 2,493,374 cf. / 43560 = 57.2 acre-ft Slope Break 158,558 sf. Slope Break 158,558 sf. 140,263 sf. x 10.00 = 1,402,632 cf. / 43560 = 32.2 acre-ft Toe of Sloa 121.968 sf. Total: 89.4 acre-fr Lake Number: Lake 19 Elevation Area Acreage Top of Bank 12.00 233,046 s£ 5.35 Control Elevation 10.00 218,671 sf. 5.02 Slope Break 0.00 152,460 sf. 3.50 Toe of Slope -10.00 123,275 sf. 2.83 Area Avg. Depth Volume Volume Top of Bank 233,046 sf. 192,753 sf. x 12.00 = 2,313,036 c£ / 43560 = 53.1 acre -ft Slope Break 152,460 sf. Slope Break 152,460 sf. 137,867 sf. x 10.00 = 1,378,674 cf. /43560 31.7acn -ii Toe of Slope 121.275 sf. Total: 84.8 sere -ft �01 Q: \2005\050150.02.0311ao.&lakes MPI1D- DRFERP,0007 Em+mnnxanal Resource PTnm fling\SubW.,k7.2ERP Application Pmpa ai,,f,W- Manege-t CxlculatimsWV? \2010- 07- 1211ency ilarpt. Ovate gwiity.cly 7/15/2010 lake Vol. 20 of 26 4:21 PM �40] 1D- 7CTAtNC. Planning Visualization ci N S U L.7' I NO Civil Engineering t �L Surveyima & Mapnina Lake Number Volume Lake 1 55.7 acre -li Lake 2 34.6 acre -ft Lake 3 166.7 acre -ft Lake 4 53.9 acre -ft Lake 5 81.8 acre -ft Lake 6 42.5 acre -ft Lake 7 67.8 acre -ft Lake 8 70.4 acre -ft Lake 9 44.1 acre -ft Lake 10 38.7 acre-ft Lake 11 59.3 acre -ft Lake 12 229.7 acre -ft Lake 13 322.1 acre -ft Lake 14 252.1 acre -ft Lake 15 13.1 acre -ft Lake 16 148.4 acre -ft Lake 17 22.6 acre-ft Lake 18 89.4 acre -ft Lake 19 84.8 acre -ft Total 1.877.7 acre-ft Project HACIENDA LAKES Proj. #: 050150.02.03 Calculated By: JAZ Date: 14- Jul -10 Checked By: JJS Date: 14- Jul -10 Q:12005 \050150.02.03 Haeiuula likes WUD- DRFERP\0007 Emdmrun wl R-- A 72 ERP Application P.I— tio,M.te Meneg— .Calculation \RA12\ 2010 -07 -12 Harvey Hagen wafer q.hly h 7/15/2010 lake Vol. 21 U20 4.21 PM u pq C C �`9 w . 011 14 N :YI C.t L5 > R .N ..>. a9Uv� z V� J JJ �l 1--i U In- E U T Y E U bA i-+ y 3 U ft$ 3 T s. o, o� e 'l. o L 7 N D` N .D M— N N N N 1z. 0 C O O O O O C O C V -• r x N � r a` - ^ N N C I CR G V �a O x N 'n r Jr 4 o M N O� M In N u I./ R r M \O i Q` N In 7 N In In M r r D` O Ifs ' x D\ u � C G C C C - C (;•. C p G� O C� N N G O C O C C M N R I O G t M d � d E (V M L Y a R i � rn In r x M N C` Vr M �? Q` ^ _ ., pp M r j -t �: N 'n 7 7 v N C C C_ C � � p N N M C M N C C yy 7 q: 0 7 M 'n ' O N C N (� yu CL w O M_ C. In b 'o In I oR. F •y � J ..� .� N_ � � Y Y .-j m 0�1 m U RESURCK C O N S U L 1 A N T S MEMORANDUM TO: Collier County Board of County Commissioners FROM: Owen Beitsch, PhD, AICP, CRE DATE: September 23, 2010 RE: Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Prepared in Conjunction with ADA/DRI Submission(s) and Review(s) (RERC 29 -115) Several questions have been raised by the County regarding the market evaluation provided as part of ADA/DRI and PUD submittals in July of this year. The analysis, which follows, has been modified from that previously reviewed to address particular comments made by the Collier County staff. T- BASIS OF DEMAND, OVERVIEW The County's guidelines for rezoning to an Activity Center designation indicate the following, among others, should be weighed as part of the analytical process. b. The amount, type and location of existing zoned commercial land, and developed commercial uses, both within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two road miles of the Mixed Use Activity Center. c. Market demand and service area for the proposed commercial land uses to be used as a guide to explore the feasibility of the requested land uses. d. Existing patterns of land use within the Mixed Use Activity Center and within two radial miles. This memorandum addresses these and several related points, concluding that the market supports the proposed uses identified in the program and that all function in concert to achieve balance among a number of planning, community, and financial objectives. The project as it has been proposed envisions a variety of uses and activities. The primary focus of Hacienda Lakes is its mix of multi and single family housing, comprised of an estimated 1760 units implemented in several phases. While the non - residential components add richly to the project, these become viable in large part because of the specific population being created on site. Certainly, the project's residents may shop or work elsewhere, just as the project's non- residential components will be available to persons living elsewhere in the County and region. 14 EAST WASHINGTON STREET • SUITE 500 • ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801 • P 407- 843 -5635 • 800 - 767 -5635 • F 407 - 839 -6197 • WWW.RERCINC.COM Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 2 of 16 Nonetheless, the on site residents are an important source of initial and ongoing support for any of the physical uses that will occur as part of the larger development program. The decision to include non - residential uses in the project stems from a combination of regulatory, market, financial, and practical considerations that together speak to their need. In the current environment, it is advantageous to integrate multiple uses to create a more satisfying built environment and enhance community sustainability by reducing transportation demands, balancing work with housing, and managing overall physical growth. As these social objectives are achieved, the project is itself more desirable to prospective residents such that its market potential and financial performance are enhanced. In effect, the ultimate mix of uses draws upon a variety of considerations which together sustain a market position and encourage demand. Need then includes influences or factors broader than determinations about incremental space or lands required, or otherwise available, in the local market area. Specific to demand as one dimension of need, it is not practical to model all possible outcomes at this stage of planning. As a result, it makes sense to think of demand in terms of a range. This range sets parameters within which actual performance might rationally be expected by the developer or others with interests in the proposed program. Consequently, we have evaluated demand for the commercial, office, business park, and lodging aspects of this project from a number of different perspectives including project based demand, share of market, and historical performance, all within the context of locations or properties that could compete over the proposed planning and development period. Presumably these different approaches should coalesce around reasonably similar answers before a final conclusion is reached. Most likely, the answers will not result in single number but will yield a tight range suggestive of targeted end point Though not identified as such, the different perspectives or methods of analysis might be viewed collectively as a sensitivity test that gauges the reasonableness of the overall analysis. Market analysis needs to be distinguished from needs analysis. The former describes how a project will respond to specific users while the latter addresses the quantity of underlying land or the gross inventory of physical space required to serve broad market segments. Need is invariably higher than demand simply because there must be adequate lands, units, or buildings to provide locational options, design features, size, and amenities which together will affect cost. Some businesses will own multiple facilities. There must be adequate lands or inventory to accommodate mobility and movement. Some housing will be transitional. Some facilities will age or become obsolescent or possibly non - conforming. Some will simply be removed. This specific study addressed potential demand. The need for the facilities, such as those described in this report, will by definition be in excess of any demand that can be documented. GENERAL MARKET OR SERVICE AREA Hacienda Lakes, as it is now planned, envisions a variety of uses and activities but the primary focus remains its mix of multi and single family housing, comprised of an estimated 1,760 units implemented in several phases. These units are a mix of multi and single family product directed at the county's growing and affluent population base. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 3 of 16 The residential aspects of the project, as described below, will draw from a region far larger than Collier County itself although the county's own population growth offers some benchmarks for planning and market testing. Any hotel or lodging components, while benefiting from other activities nearby, is not necessarily correlated with the particulars of the location or the project. Similarly, other parts of the planned venture will draw from varied geography or be driven by conditions or circumstances particular only to the resident population. Retail or commercial uses proposed for Hacienda Lakes may be among those activities with the most discrete service area but the analysis, as it is laid out in subsequent sections, is sufficiently conservative that the population of the project itself demonstrates adequate spending potential to posit need or demand for such facilities as part of the general land development scheme. Ultimately, the analysis focuses on its own residential population, not that of any surrounding or competing areas, to generate support or demand adequate to substantiate the project's non - residential elements. it: i LL_ i To establish context we have assumed that the geographical area most affected by or that will interact with Hacienda Lakes is comprised of a radial distance about 2.5 miles from the intersection of CR951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. This area is consistent with direction received from staff and acknowledges certain external factors should be considered for their possible implications. Within that area, TAZ data prepared by the MPO suggests there were approximately 12, 447 people present in 2010, growing to 15,409 people in 2015. At the 2030 benchmark, these people will be comprised of about 17,000 households for planning purposes. The radial analysis includes each TAZ fully encapsulated in the 2.5 mile distance while excluding those which are included only marginally. Altogether, we considered thirteen TAZ's for inclusion within this discrete area. This same area was matched generally ,.`,. D11 N. to CLARITAS to estimate incomes of the population in place. While the CLARITA data does not match the time frame of the TAZ data, it does offer insight into the earnings and spending potential of this part of Collier County. According to CLARITAS, the area now has an average household income of about $82,000, growing to more than $90,000 in 20i5. It is not altogether if the TAZ data prepared by Collier County includes the estimated dwelling unit counts associated with Hacienda Lakes which, as described later in this memo, will have incomes much higher than those for the larger area. The four TAZ's most closely associated with Hacienda L indicate about 1800 units in place by 2030, comparable to the number actually REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Hacienda Lakes o 0.25 0.5 Miles Study Area 2.5 Miles from Intersection ,1 1 \t tl a o, 'a [o••I, —It _ Sunacing 5 Mepp,ug N Prepared By. nnjones Printing Dale'. Sept 22, 2010 File: T:\Projeds\ 2005 \05_0150.02.03_Haoeoda Lakes\ GMP\Rev02 \Haciend, StudyA ea AcIClr2.5.mxd Source: Zoning & PUD (Collier County Government) C] 0 0.25 0.5 Miles A ' Hacienda Lakes ■� ���lTl`�. Traffic Analysis Zones /� �. "" � ` IA I ...L JL Manning •Vi —limual 00 by ering - Sur vmg d Mapping N Prepared By:n jonea Printing Dale: Sept 22, 2010 File: T:tPrgKt9t200$\05_O15D.02.03 HadendalakeM GMPtRev02 %Hn,Wde_AWCtr2.5TAZ.mxd Source: TAZ & PUD (CoYier County Govemmen() Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 4 of 16 planned for the project. Whether or not the TAZ data explicitly recognizes Hacienda Lakes, the ultimate area incomes will be favorably affected by the project's proposed units. For the most part, the area is significantly undeveloped but might be considered an emerging area in the County for analytical purposes. As a result, much of the analysis is prospective and strongly associated with the population and incomes of the project's own housing counts. To the degree, support accrues to the project's components by realizing capture, visitation, or spending from any existing population or sources of income, this would be considered favorable to this analysis as presented. RESIDENTIAL DEMAND The residential framework and development program at Hacienda Lakes is fundamental to providing support for the project's non - residential elements. Given the current downturn in the housing market, it is appropriate to consider the dynamics of the longer housing market. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), it is generally agreed that the current recession began in December 2007. No formal close to the recession has been announced by NBER, the body generally recognized as the benchmarking authority for the nation's business cycles, but Spring 2010 is emerging as a likely end point according to many economists. Whatever the official end date, the decline in economic health well exceeds the 16 month contractions suffered first from 1973 to 1975 and then again from 1981 to 1982. These earlier downturns constitute the longest recessionary periods since the Great Depression. Although recent data remains mixed, it does on the whole suggest the steep economic decline already suffered is modulating leading to some consensus about a passing, if not ending, event. • Nationally, nonfarm employment edged upwards since December 2009. Preliminary data shows an increase of 290,000 employees from March 2010 to April 2010. The nation's unemployment rate dipped to 9.5 (P) in April 2010. • Even with some continuing loss of jobs, consumer confidence, an important predictor of spending potential, maintains an upward movement. The Conference Board (CB) reported that its index which had improved to 53.3 in May, up from 57.7 in April. The index had sagged somewhat after the first of the year but the most recent measure concludes three straight months of gains. The steady improvement is evidence of a more strident role for the consumer in rebuilding the nation's economy. The CB's Index of leading economic indicators (LEI) for the U.S. declined 0.1 percent in April, following a 1.3% gain in March, and a 0.4% rise in February. As of March there had been about one year of steady increases in this measure prompting CB economist Ken Goldstein to observe, "These results suggest a recovery that will continue through the summer, although it could lose a little steam." At the same time, CB's coincident index (CEI), a measure of current economic activity, has been improving steadily since middle of 2009. The results from the CB largely mirror information from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). BEA, in its May 27, 2010 release, reported that gross domestic product GDP Real (GDP) increased 3.0 % in the first quarter of 2010 after increasing 5.6% in the fourth quarter of 2009. The increase tracks higher consumer spending, improved exports, and investments made for private inventory and residential activity. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 5 of 16 Privately owned housing completions in May 2010 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 687,000. This is 7.4% below the revised April 2010 estimate of 742,000 units but is 15.4% below the revised May 2009 rate of 812,000 units. May 2010 building permits, which offer some perspective of near term future activity, fell about 5.9% below the revised April 2010 figures but were 4.4% above the numbers for May 2009. Without suggesting that any part of Florida will rebound from the rescission immediately, population growth will resume at rates necessitating additional housing from several quarters. The more recently trends offer the expectation that a recovery is looming and that planning to take advantage of coming changes is not inappropriate. Without regard to County policy, growth in population has generally exceeded the BEBR moderate series. From a demand and economic perspective, it is worthy to consider how recent favorable shifts in various economic indicators might assure this growth is realized over the likely planning horizon. In any case, Collier County's population will have reached 518,100 persons by 2035 according to BEBR's most recent moderate series of projections. This is an increase over the 2010 population of approximately 184,000 people or a minimum increase of about 74,000 resident households. The current recession notwithstanding, this growth suggests a significant source of demand from incremental expansion of the area's permanent households. To clear its inventory of some 1700 units, Hacienda Lakes need capture only about 13.2% of the expected change through 2015, something of a high penetration rate but not untenable given the slowdown in planning now being experienced. Applying BEBR's moderate projections through 2035, the project would have to capture only about 2.3% of the total resident change. Should the resident population exceed the moderate range, this percentage would decrease accordingly. It is worth noting that the moderate projection has actually been adjusted upward by about 10,000 people over that reported only one year before by BEBR, evidence of the conservative nature of this analysis. These numbers are only indicative of the many diverse layers of housing demand that will be realized from within the base of the existing population and experienced in the guise of relocations for preference, convenience, school choice, or realignment of family needs. The Estimated Population viowth Naples existing population also gives rise to housing demands that occur exclusively from new 700,000 household formations generated as the result of divorces, new marriages, and returning children. 600,000 The projected change in permanent or fulltime resident population, however, is only the most obvious source of potential demand. Demand also stems from sources that are not immediately evident in terms of their affects on the measurable population. Specifically, the area's effective population, as many indicators substantiate, is materially higher than the reported permanent population and will drive demand higher. As the permanent segments 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 2004 2009 2014 (Tom Doyle Data Source: Collier Courty GoHernmert have grown, these too are reasonably posited to show increases. The impacts of these non- REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 6 of 16 resident population counts are obvious in the accompanying graph prepared by Collier County staff. Mobility and its impacts are further illustrated in data distributed by Sun Realty of Naples. Reporting that fewer than 50% of local homes are bought by area residents, the organization also reports fewer than 10% actually reside in Florida, meaning a substantial number of homes in the Naples area are occupied as second homes. Without validating the data as Where Naples Residents Live altogether correct, the inference, in the context;. of other factors, clearly is that the scale of the Region market cannot be adequately judged by an •Florida analysis of current and projected resident 8 Mid Atlantic population alone. R Midwest Among the key drivers of the second or seasonal phenomenon is the state's tax structure. Without an income tax, Florida is especially attractive to high income households, and Naples has historically been a draw for this socio- economic group. K Kew England t Foreign ► other states Additional observations regarding the effective population come from these sources: • The American Community Survey (2006 -2008) indicates that there were an estimated 53,350 units of a total 192,000 housing units in Collier County held exclusively for seasonal and second home usage. These seasonal units represent about 28% of the total inventory. As of 2009, there were a reported 75 hotel and motel establishments in Collier County with a combined room count of 6814 rooms. According to the local Convention and Visitors Bureau, occupancies swell in the winter and spring months to 70% or more. • As evidenced by a perusal of the region's tax rolls, a substantial share of the local housing market is occupied by non - residents, many from overseas as well as elsewhere in the United States that domicile in Collier County on a seasonal and second home basis. Of 181,292 residential parcels identified on the 2009 tax rolls, 57,547 were identified as out -of -state or foreign owners. Whatever factor(s) one applies to the above particular indicators, they are suggestive of higher population counts and represent a demonstrable interest in this regional location. These prospective residents could represent some 25 % -35% of the project's households but are not necessary to maintain an otherwise reasonable market share. Still, another way of benchmarking data is to consider building permits as a function of the reported resident population change over some longer period of time so that the pace of construction activity is moderated. The area market was experiencing significant pressure from non - resident purchasers well before the onset of the current recession so permits may be deemed a more reliable indicator of housing trends on average than changes measured in population. From 2000 -2010, the population changed by about 82,000 people. Over this same time frame, about 52,000 permits were issued locally. For each person, approximately 0.62 permits were recorded yielding today's inventory. Rather than suggesting merely an overbuilt REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 7 of 16 situation, if that is the case, the relationships illustrate the general degree to which housing construction has responded to external influence. Using a more conservative and lower 0.55 relationship, at least some 18,000 housing units would still need to be constructed by 2015 with an additional 83,000 constructed by 2035. Viewed in terms of market share against these numbers, Hacienda Lakes would need to capture less than 10% of the housing required by 2015. On balance, the fundamental demographics support the project's unit count. Its position will have to be validated by cost and pricing analysis that should not be confused with basic issues involving growth and general housing demand. NON - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, OVERVIEW As the accompanying table indicates, there has been a steady progression of non- residential development in the Collier County, which generally matches the increase observed in residential activity. At least since 1995, about 1,700,000 square feet (SF) of various Commercial inventory In service, Collier County Selected years 1995 -1998 1995 -2008 1999 -2008 1995 -2008 1999 -2008 Average Average Commercial 1,743,030 10,986,605 9,243,575 784,758 924,358 Office/ Banks 627,673 2,667,745 2,040,072 190,553 204,007 Industrial 1,241,887 4,112,661 2,870,774 293,762 287,077 Total 3,612, 590 17,767,011 14,154,421 1,776,701 1,415,442 kinds of facilities have been placed benchmark dates shown purposely and because they may have not December 2008, about 14,000,000 commercial space. into service annually ending upon need and location. The ignore later additions because they may not be occupied properly matched the pace of actually demand. As of SF total were added with about 64% accounted for as Such numbers have greater meaning in the context of other jurisdictions where there have presumably been different rates of development and emphasis on the appropriate uses and forms. Viewed in the aggregate, however, these numbers from areas with varied levels of economic maturity offer some broader benchmarks by which activity might be measured relative to residential development or population growth. On an overall basis, it can be rationally assumed that these markets achieve relative balance in their land use demands over an extended time, especially if aberrational periods are removed as reference points. For purposes of multi - jurisdictional comparison, our analysis correlates to the total number of dwelling units, not population, The former offers the certainty that the effective population and its related needs, spending or demand are captured in the analytical framework whether or not that population is officially recognized as the resident population. The table below summarizes selected data by designated land codes from each respective county's tax roll(s). It is a composite of all development existing within the built environment as of 2000. This period would overlook the levels of activity occurring since 2005 and now shown to be unsustainable. Looking at the totals only, it would not be unreasonable to expect each dwelling unit to support a minimum of 91 SF, potentially as much as an average of 279 SF although there many instances in more mature settings where the numbers reach beyond 300 SF. The particulars of these numbers, of course, depend on the actual match to the finally approved and implemented program which may show some variation. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 8 of 16 Non - residential inventory in service, selected counties, 2000 Total retail and commercial inventory in service (SF) per dwelling unit (DU) as of December.. 2000. Includes DOR (land use) codes 11 -14, 16,29,30 Total office inventory in service (SF) per dwelling unit (DU)as of December, 2000. Includes DOR (land use) codes 17- 29,23 -25 Total industrial inventory in service (SF) per dwelling unit (DU)as of December, 2000. Includes DOR (land use) codes 85,86,87 Total all Alachua 136.96 76.11 123.01 336.09 Charlotte 91.80 18.49 49.87 160.16 Clay 211.22 40.68 109.44 361.35 Collier 107.23 28.58 69.35 205.16 Dade 131.65 96.32 235.54 463.51 Desoto 83.01 32.85 63.81 179.67 Gadsen 86.83 54.80 267.03 408.65 Glades 43.97 7.09 40.30 91.35 Hardee 78.08 35.40 52.33 165.81 Highlands 82.22 30.30 62.18 174.69 Lake 106.80 42.49 120.42 269.70 Liberty 65.49 21.54 26.00 113.03 Okaloosa 149.62 73.53 117.39 340.54 Okeechobee 136.32 33.67 18.86 188.85 Orange 167.65 142.01 240.68 550.33 Polk 112.71 47.92 217.94 378.56 Seminole 151.98 91.22 170.08 413.28 St. Lucie 99.67 31.54 97.87 229.08 Average 113.51 50.25 115.67 279.43 Low 43.97 7.09 18.86 91.35 High 211.22 142.01 267.03 550.33 Understanding that (1) these many other counties are not by themselves a metric, (2) there are some overlaps and discrepancies in the codes themselves relative to specific users that might be actually attracted to the subject property, and (3) within the codes themselves it cannot be assumed that each county accurately reports the data, the information in aggregate does identify the level of inventory and activity that is supported at a jurisdictional level, correlated to some commensurate scale of residential activity. The overlaps and discrepancies, to the degree they even exist, do not distort the objective or purpose of the analysis because specific kinds of users do not necessarily match the physical coding of the use. For example, a physician's office or a place of worship may occupy space within a property that the DOR code notes is a shopping center. The critical aspect of the correlation is not the use per se but the generalized level of activity or space in service compared to the population base supporting it. Over time, the users may change, even if the DOR codes do not. Taken this way, the collective experience of these several counties establishes a reference point for the planned program at Hacienda Lakes, explained in more detail over the next several pages. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 9 of 16 Future Retail and Commercial Demands Each year the Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes its Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE). The survey that began in 1980 consists of an interview in which consumer units (households typically) are queried every 3 months over a 12 -month period to track income, tax and expenditure habits, distinguishing these by size of household, Average annual expenditures, Consumer Expenditure Survey, zoos $443 employment status, income and other $863 $100,000 $100,000 to $120,000to $150,000and attributes. The survey effort is Item and more $119,999 $149,000 more designed to capture different types of Major appliances $394 $274 $362 consumer expenditures occurring Income after taxes $157,379 $,05,046 $,27,295 $220,26, over a period of time. It is among the Average annual expenditures $100,065 $77,585 $81,590 $124,678 most detailed reconciliations of Apparel and services $3,643 $2,734 $3,122 American consumer habits. A part of Food at home $5,690 $5,390 $5,755 $5.940 that survey is reproduced here in Food away from home $5,611 $4.383 $5,214 $7,071 summary form with the relevant Alcoholic beverages $919 $761 $904 $1,083 categories of spending or other Healthcare $4,471 $4,037 $4,316 information highlighted. Materials not Housekeeping supplies $1,165 $1,147 $1,097 $1,238 highlighted or referenced provide Laundry and cleaning supplies $212 $199 $236 $208 context but are not a part of any Other household products $702 $735 $600 $747 $6,835 Postage and stationery $251 $213 $260 $282 calculations as discussed. Reading -3531 $2642 $3091 $4631 In effect, the CE offers a glimpse of what families allocate to certain activities and provides a framework for projecting what those expenses are and how they may ultimately manifest themselves in terms of supportable demand for physical facilities. The unit of analysis is the household. While there remain some questions at this point what specific users, restaurants, or other operators may ultimately be drawn to the Hacienda Lakes location, the spending habits of the project's affluent households are reasonably determinant. Household furnishings and equipment Household textiles $303 $206 $239 $443 Furniture $863 $573 $727 $1,191 Floor coverings $104 $93 $82 $128 Major appliances $394 $274 $362 $515 Small appliances $232 $156 $208 $325 Miscellaneous household equipment $1,634 $1,341 $1.474 $2,029 Apparel and services $3,643 $2,734 $3,122 $4,886 Transportation $15,674 $13,424 $15,720 Vehicle purchases (net outlay) $5,450 $4,546 $5,764 $5,984 Gasoline and motor oil $4,208 $3,954 $4,237 $4,396 Healthcare $4,471 $4,037 $4,316 $4,931 Drugs $651 $615 $644 $686 Medical supplies $198 $171 $167 $244 Entertainment $5,869 $4,306 $6,363 $6,835 Personal care products and services $1,198 $947 $1.138 $1,472 Reading $233 $197 $210 $278 Given the nature of the residential Tobacco products and smoking supplies $258 $322 $244 $217 program and the apparent demand segments, the larger project is likely Miscellaneous 51,767 $1,276 $1,612 $2277 to be oriented toward the regions' Household expenditures, except cars $41,404 highest income families. In 2008, the Household expenditures, including cars $47,236 CE indicates that households with incomes in excess of $150,000 per year allocated on average about $41,000 of a total $124,000 available for food at home, outside dining, entertainment, personal needs, and miscellaneous household expenditures. These sums do not include those directed to housing, transportation, automotive purchases and services, education, insurance, and many other items not of immediate relevance to this analysis and not shown in the table at all. Nonetheless, these too REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 10 of 16 might also be purchased or consumed nearby within facilities or buildings just for that purpose. Medical services would be an example of the latter category of goods or services not counted. Because of these or similar exclusions, the list of identified consumables, in this context, would be deemed conservative. Based on the expected housing count in Hacienda Lakes (1760 units) and its consumption patterns ($41,000- $47,000 per household on average), its group of households would reasonably be expected to allocate some $72,000,000 in total annual spending for a variety of goods and services that could be located on site and within the project's scope. If automobile purchases are assumed to be a part of the mix, the total rises to an expected $83,000,000. Again, the specifics will be a function of the users matched to the site's locational and market features as building plans are implemented. Presumably, existing residents in the same geographic area are already adequate served by their choice of commercial of facilities. Should this population be attracted to any commercial activity at this location, the demand generated by those potential users would be incremental to these estimates of spending. On balance, it is reasonable to expect some of the project's residents to pursue commercial opportunities elsewhere in the region, just as it is plausible to anticipate support from existing residents to the exclusion of shopping in other parts of the county. In theoretical terms, data collected by the US Bureau of the Census directly from retailers and service providers, would reconcile to the reported spending of individual or household consumers. Although the data and categorization of the information fail to match perfectly to the CE, they provide yet another means of gauging aggregate expenditure potential. In 2009, the per capita spending for a more discrete set of items - general retail and food only - was approximately $11,000, down materially from $12,000 estimated in 2008. At an assumed household size of 2.5 persons, the total expenditures would be would almost $50,000,000. This estimate is not income adjusted, does not include some categories identified specifically in the CE survey, and excludes all auto related expenses, including even gas or oil purchases. Again, this estimated expenditure reflects only the population of Hacienda Lakes. Existing residents in the service area potentially add to this sum. According to Sales & Marketing Management 2002 Survey of Buying Power, Naples significantly exceeds both the national and state average for retail sales per household, with $39,583. Florida's average retail sales per household is $32,024, while the U.S. average is $33,662. Given these much higher numbers, the per capita estimates seem very conservative. Certainly used as a proxy for supportable spending, the estimated $50,000,000 in consumables would be substantially more conservative than the sums suggested by the CE survey but sufficiently close to validate the estimate. How individual operators or users respond to these spending patterns is subject to extreme variation depending on size, type, and market position. The Urban Land Institute's (ULI) Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers is the definitive source of retail metrics. The data is useful as a benchmark but it is focused almost exclusively on shopping centers, and much of what functions as retail may not be in a conventional retailing environment or be of a size below ULI's reporting thresholds. Given that caveat, it can be assumed in general that sales occurring in appropriate venues would average from a low of approximately $150 per square foot (SF) to a high of about $485 per SF with many around $200 per SF. These numbers reflect a blend of retailers, restaurants and other establishments. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 11 of 16 Given a potential $72,000,000 in sales from the project's households, these figures, in conjunction with sales per SF, suggest that a low of 150,000 SF (sales of $485/SF) up to a high of 363,000 SF (sales of $200 /SF) might be supported based upon choice of tenants and sales volume experienced. At an assumed sales projection of $50,000,000, a supportable program could support an estimated 315,000 per SF (sales of $150 /SF). If the highest figure (363,000 SF) is optimistic, the lower end of the range (150,000 SF) matches well to the County's estimated commercial and retail square footage per dwelling unit (1760 units x 107 SF) as these relationships existed in the year 2000, acknowledging the potential for inconsistencies in the DOR classification. A reminder, we benchmark to this single year to moderate the rapid spike in all kinds of development which occurred mid decade. Further, the number is well within a reasonable market share of the actual absorption occurring in the ten yrs from 1998 -2008 and the annual average achieved during this period. These benchmarks not withstanding, the most probable number reflects average sales of some $200 per SF generating a supportable program between the low and the high at about 340,000 SF based on assumed annual sales of $72,000,000 which excludes any considerations or impacts of auto sales. Including frictional vacancies of 5 %, the number rises to about 357,000 SF, well above the size of the retail facilities contemplated in the current application. The supportable square footage would be materially higher if auto sales or other activities should ultimately figure into the mix of operators, and there is no reason to remove such prospective users until development plans advance. Again, these expenditures depend only on the population of Hacienda Lakes. Any existing population counts in the general service area could push these numbers higher but that would suggest spending is being diverted from commercial outlets already in operation. Actual absorption of space would be yet another indicator of demand potential although the data is more generalized and covers an aggressive period of retail inventory expansion. Without regard to location, about 2,700,000 SF of retail space were absorbed countywide from the end of 2005 through the end of 2009, according to data prepared by CoStar, an annualized rate of about 553,000 SF. This is well below the figure suggested by data summarized from the County's tax rolls, and reported earlier, at some 900,000 SF over a ten year period. Either reference point, in the context of the physically identifiable market, suggests the project's proposed commercial program is relatively modest. Overall, we think the retail and commercial components are justified in the proposed project based on the scale of other elements in the plan. Even recognizing, current vacancies in the market which are above 10 %, the planned development program is not unreasonable in the time frame presented. Future Office Demands While the commercial opportunities on site are beneficially and symbiotically associated with the concentration of nearby housing, the demand for office space is less direct. Nonetheless, for planning purposes, it is still useful to think of additional office space inventory in terms of incremental change in either area population or household growth because of their association with employment changes. Not unlike the commercial uses planned as part of Hacienda Lakes, need for office uses in the context of the larger development program includes influences or factors that are broader than considerations of incremental space required or already available in the local market area. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 12 of 16 As the data reported previously illustrates, there are no specific measures that would suggest a single benchmark for office space. Unlike retail which is commensurate with certain spending patterns, levels of residential activity, and settlement patterns, the ultimate demand for office space depends on the area's capacity to function as a major employment center. Absent a level of mature economic activity, it may be unreasonable to anticipate demand for office space beyond that associated with basic insurance, financial, medical, or miscellaneous personal services. Rather than reaching levels of 90 SF - 140 SF per dwelling unit, like Orange, Dade, or Seminole counties, the more appropriate measure might be a lower 50 SF - 60 SF per dwelling unit. Again, these numbers reflect the housing counts and their relationship to inventories in place during 2000. Because these numbers were realized before the surge in construction activity leading into the current recession, they are unlikely to misrepresent the relationship between housing and other kinds of development. At these benchmark figures, some 88,000 SF (50 SF/ unit) to 105,000 SF (60 SF/ unit) of office space might be supported, numbers above those shown in the proposed development program. Again, even recognizing, current vacancies in the market which may be near 15 %, the planned development program is not unreasonable in the time frame presented. Collier County's actual number in 2000 was 28.50 SF of office space per dwelling unit. If correct, the number would suggest a low of about 50,000 SF of office space might be supported. In the context of the reference numbers for other counties, 28.50 SF seems low if the County's wish is to promote continued economic development and diversification of employment opportunities. At the very least, this means of estimating demand signals a floor for the proposed program. Actual absorption of space would be yet another indicator of demand potential although the data is plausibly discounted since, like the retail data reported, it also covers an aggressive period of development and construction. Without regard to location, about 1,300,000 SF of office space were absorbed countywide from the end of 2005 through the end of 2009, an annualized rate of about 325,000 SF. The project's proposed office inventory represents a very small part of the physically identifiable office market. Again, a full occupancy is unlikely to be achieved. Consequently, the inventory built to accommodate this potential demand would be moderately higher to allow for frictional vacancies. As with the retail and commercial estimates, the most probable number falls between the low (50,000 SF) and the high (105,000 SF) at about 75,000 SF, approximately the figures proposed in the development program. While the analysis acknowledges possible inconsistencies or overlaps in the original DOR data, the impacts, if any, are addressed in the thresholds deemed supportable. Future Hotel Demands As with the other uses, it is useful to think of the lodging inventory relative to the scaie of the population which is a proxy for the area's strength as a business and tourist destination. Since the region offers so many beaches and natural features, the relationship between population and the available inventory is likely to understate the strength of the market and its potential to support added rooms. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 13 of 16 Using the 2000 population of 251,400 persons to establish a benchmark, there was one room for every 35 -40 persons in Collier County based on data available from the Department of Business Regulation. As with the retail and office uses described above, these numbers illustrate conditions before the surge in construction activity leading into the current recession. These numbers change to one room for approximately 45 -50 persons using an estimated 2008 population of 332,856. Together, the higher and lower population counts suggest a supportable room count of approximately 120 rooms to 150 rooms at the Hacienda Lakes site, a range consistent with the 135 rooms contemplated in the proposed development plan. If the project's other features are themselves supported as the analysis suggests, they will in turn add to the base of support for the proposed hotel which is envisioned as a limited service property of the type typically sited proximate interstate interchanges and along major commercial roads. In 2009, the county's occupancy rate was reported by the CVB to be about 65% indicating some question about the viability of hotels in less supportive locations or settings. Here, a limited service lodging property is a use which complements the other proposed non - residential uses, and it functions as still another amenity for Hacienda Lakes. The lodging use is appropriate given the larger mixed use concept being proposed. Future Business Park or Industrial Demands Business park uses are less discrete in terms of their orientation compared to the other categories of land use proposed for the development program. Normally, these business park uses are comprised of some combination of office, flex, warehouse, and /or manufacturing facilities. Flex space is comprised of finishes that balance office and warehouse or distribution functions. Office spaces most likely to be sited in a business park setting will be class B or C structures and would not readily compete with the class A facilities contemplated elsewhere in the larger project. Not unlike the market for office facilities, there are no specific measures that would suggest a single appropriate benchmark for industrial or business park needs. As with office space, the ultimate demand for space that might support industrial, semi - industrial or distribution activities is highly dependent upon the area's capacity to function as a major employment center. Absent a level of mature economic activity, it may be unreasonable to anticipate demand for business park uses that normally flow to a regional commercial hub. Here, the needs are likely to be more locally oriented although that could change over the project's implementation timetable. Given the region's higher incomes, the market price for land suited to housing and other forms of non - residential activity tends to preclude these kinds of uses which are necessary whatever the state of the economy. Consequently, it can be reasoned that business park or similar uses are now under represented in Collier County. Rather than reaching levels of 120 SF - 240 SF per dwelling unit, like Lake, Orange, or Polk counties, the more appropriate measure might be a lower 70 SF - 90 SF per dwelling unit, numbers that begin to push beyond the present level but which do not rise to the capability of a regional distribution center. These numbers suggest a range of 123,000 SF (70 SF/ unit) to 158,000 SF (90 SF/ unit) oriented to business park functions and structures, effectively figures in keeping with the current program. These numbers reflect conventional warehousing and semi - industrial characteristics but inevitably some space will shift to activities more compatible with office needs. Given that the overall program could be deemed light in terms of its conventional office elements, some of the longer term demands might be satisfied within the REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 14 of 16 confines of a business park environment. Again, this last observation reflects possible inconsistencies or overlaps in the original DOR data. How these business park uses will ultimately adapt to market needs will depend largely on the way in which the region and location are marketed. Still, they seem to be a reasonable complement to the balance of the development program. COMPETING LANDS AND ENTITLEMENTS As outlined in the County's requirements, we have surveyed nearby properties which might accommodate some of the uses or activities proposed in the development plan and /or potentially competing for the demands estimated. A profile of the eleven projects which might be deemed significant for Concentrations of Competing uses, Hacienda Lakes this analysis Is shown In Retail and office uses located within two miles of CR951 /Rattlesnake Hammock Commercial Developed the accompanying table. Square Commercial RWA Ordinance Total Commercial Footage Square ID NAME Comments Number Acreage Acreage Approved Footage We see only a limited relevance for competing lands in the context of this analysis. For the most part, the actual implementation of any use remains largely speculative at this stage of planning. Because many of these potential projects will never be constructed, the project's residential uses, which comprise the focus of the project, may never have access to the facilities or services that could be offered only if these other projects are built as envisioned. COLLIER REGIONAL Approved for 260K hospital and SOK 1 MEDICAL CENTER medical office. 80K office already developed. 04 -28 60.00 60.00 340,000 275,946 (DRI- 99 -1). Neighborhood commercial 12 WINDING CYPRESS not open to the public 02 -35 1,928.00 15.00 30,000 Office and commercial uses allowed. Developed with an Urgent Care and an 15 EDISON VILLAGE Arri —th Bank. One parcel left. 00-83 7.44 5.66 54,000 25,000' Developed with a Publix anchored shopping NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY center, Fifth Third Bank, Radiation Therapy 21 CLUB Office & Southtrust Bank. One parcel left 03 -33 485.02 15.00 110,000 80,000' 25 SIERRA MEADOWS (EX) Vacant. Retail /Office allowed 99 -91 90.80 30.20 260,000 DRI- 84 -3C; Only listed 30 acres which are the C3 uses per PUD (which are in the study area); On Rattlesnake Hammock /Grand Lely 27 LELY RESORT Dr and on CR951 /Grand Lely Dr 07 -72 2,892.50 30.00 300,000" HAMMOCK PARK 30 COMMERCE CENTER Retail /Office allowed. 07 -30 20.23 19.05 160,000 - Retail /Office allowed. Assisted Living also 31 GOOD TURN CENTER allowed instead of commercial. 09 -53 9.50 9.50 100,000 Medical & General Office. No retail allowed. 32 MCMULLEN PUD ALF also allowed instead of commercial. 10-18 19.32 19.32 30,000'" - Parcel North of Good Turn 34/35 PUD IC -5 zoning) Two parcels 9.24 9.24 Parcel (C -3 zoning) North 33 of C -5 zoning 9.24 9.24 ' Approximate amount. Did not use county numbers as there has been construction since last County Update. "Estimated at 10,DDOsf per acre of developable commercial acreage. "' Based on it being developed as ALF. 3 acres are within 1/4 mile from hospital allowing medical office. Estimated at 30,000sf Source: PUD Ordinances, Collier County PUD list Of the 1,756,000 SF shown in the table, very little has already been built, adding to the speculative nature of the plans. Of that which is built, almost two - thirds has a distinct medical orientation which has not been directly considered in the demand estimates outlined for the project. For the most part, there are no obvious opportunities that might satisfy a lodging demand such as proposed in the proposed plan. Locations that might be deemed competitive for hospitality uses are constrained in their value because of the larger mixed use concept that supports this particular activity. There are no known or identifiable industrial or business park uses being contemplated in the area of primary concern. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 15 of 16 In addition to these properties, we also summarized TAZ data that identified parcels or projects by zoning or current activity. Since this data was not complied by the planning team independently, however, we cannot confirm that it is altogether current. That said, with some ti ns the information found in this Planning Community Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ's) 2000 Bldg. Land Zoning Square Feet Area (acres) A 2,866 0.0 C -3 0 1.0 C -4 1,575 1.5 CF 2,504 12.5 1 1,708 0.8 PUD 317,553 231.0 RMF- 12(10) 0 1.5 Total 326,206 248.3 excep o , additional level of analysis appears reasonably consistent with the planning team's own field inventory of the area's most relevant or potentially competitive holdings. As to these other projects or properties identified by the planning team or others generally it remains entirely conjectural that the approvals attached to these other sites, their supporting infrastructure, price, general availability, physical suitability, market timing, owner's expectations, or planned programs will be in concert with the specific programmatic features that will define Hacienda Lakes or satisfy its development goals. In effect, how and when these nearby lands or parcels could be used is a secondary consideration in weighing the needs for similar land uses within Hacienda Lakes itself. In the absence of the project's own supporting non - residential features or activities, the residential uses are materially handicapped in terms of achieving their market position. This is a constraint to the project which becomes a further constraint on its currently expected financial performance. Because the (1) project's own proposed non - residential uses are supportable or in proportion to the population and numbers of housing units planned and (2) they add to the mix of activity deemed desirable to the performance of the larger project, other lands that might also be available to accommodate opportunities generated by the population of Hacienda Lakes are of no material importance in evaluating development options. Were they to be sited on other entitled lands — should they be available as their entitlements suggest -- the project's non- residential components would not benefit the balance of the development program as it has been conceived while requiring more frequent and longer trip lengths to achieve the same objective. To the degree that alternative sites may be desirable for other uses or purposes, it is evident that they are dependent upon the population base being created at Hacienda Lakes and similarly situated residential communities being planned. Stated somewhat differently, these other sites add little of value to the concept being proposed. CONCEPT OVERALL, SUMMARY There are many different considerations or factors to weigh in determining the overall and most desirable mix of uses to be entitled and developed. Because the project's primary focus is centered on residential uses, these must be the applicant's principal concern. In that regard, the evidence seems to indicate that the relative magnitude of population growth and interest in second or seasonal homes justifies the project's primary land use. While the current state of the economy seems to mitigate this potential, the longer term data and recent shifts in the economy point to recovery, suggesting the applicant's plans are reasonably considered now. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC. Market and Needs Evaluation for Hacienda Lakes Page 16 of 16 Other components of the project have a base of market support, estimated by their relationship to the total number of units proposed, likely spending, and prior patterns of use and demand extending over several years. The relative scale of these uses remains consistent with data drawn from a number of jurisdictions suggesting reasonableness overall in terms of analytical approach and the conclusions developed from that approach. Any approach has certain weaknesses but these are controlled in the present case by multiple lines of analysis that reach similar conclusions. Still, these conclusions are presented in terms of a range, rather than a single point estimate, to avoid inferences of accuracy greater than those we believe are possible. Again, the current state of the economy, though something of a concern, is not a long term bellwether of the estimates provided. Aside form the expectations of demand, there are broader community and planning values to consider which largely dictate that any major residential project also include complementing land uses to enhance the value both to residents and investors. In that regard, competing projects, though something of an issue, are not the single consideration for proceeding with the broader concept as proposed. As for competing properties, there do not appear to be any that can adequately accommodate the proposed plan's business park activities. Most of these plans remain speculative and uncertain. If the proposed project is to realize its market position, it cannot be handicapped or constrained by perceptions of projects that will not occur with some level of certainty. REAL ESTATE RESEARCH CONSULTANTS, INC.