Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Hacienda Lakes-BCC Review (DRI-2006-AR-10147)
AGENDA HACIENDA LAKES BCC REVIEW DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 u 1 DA11A INC CONSUL -TING Z \ v VL JL : k 4 F a; Presented By: Hacienda Lakes ®f Naples, LLC ENTRIX Down to Ear Ur. Down to Business: (a COLEMAN YOVANOVICH KOES ER Tindale- Oliver & PASSARELLA RESEARCH Associates, Inc. rin r & ASSOCIATES M U L H E R E& i Planning and Engineering � C O N S U L T A N T S ASSOCIATES ~a g DA11A INC CONSUL -TING Z \ v VL JL : k 4 F a; Presented By: Hacienda Lakes ®f Naples, LLC ENTRIX Down to Ear Ur. Down to Business: (a COLEMAN YOVANOVICH KOES ER Tindale- Oliver & PASSARELLA RESEARCH Associates, Inc. rin r & ASSOCIATES M U L H E R E& i Planning and Engineering � C O N S U L T A N T S ASSOCIATES Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal Development Order Provided by Collier County Staff Planning Vig —inon Engineering Surveying RESOLUTION NO. DEVELOPMENT ORDER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR HACIENDA LAKES, A DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT LOCATED IN SECTIONS 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, AND SECTIONS 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; WHICH WILL ALLOW 1,760 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, 327,500 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL USE, 70,000 SQUARE FEET OF PROFESSIONAL AND MEDICAL OFFICE, A 135 -ROOM HOTEL, 140,000 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS PARK OR EDUCATIONAL FACILITY, AND CONTINUATION OF EXISTING JUNIOR DEPUTIES PASSIVE RECREATION AND EXISTING SWAMP BUGGY ATTRACTION; PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING FOR CONCLUSIONS OF LAW; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on July 21, 2006, Toll - Rattlesnake, LLC, in accordance with Subsection 380.06(6), Florida Statutes, filed an Application for Development Approval (ADA) of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) known as Toll - Rattlesnake with Collier County (DRI- 2006 -AR- 10147) and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (DRI No. 06 -492); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Florida Administrative Code's DRI Rule 291- 4.001(5) the Executive Director of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) administratively approved an initial 45 -day sufficiency response extension, and the Regional Planning Council approved nine (9) subsequent sufficiency response extensions; and WHEREAS, on January 26 and 27, 2010, Wilton Land Company, LLC obtained title to the majority portion of lands within the DRI; and WHEREAS, on October 14, 1982, Swamp Buggy Day, Inc. (now known as Swamp Buggy, Inc.) obtained title to a minor portion of the lands within the DRI; and Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09 /15/11 Page 1 of 56 WHEREAS, on December 27, 1995, Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc. obtained title to a minor portion of the lands within the DRI; and WHEREAS, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC is authorized by Wilton Land Company, LLC, Swamp Buggy, Inc., and Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc., (hereinafter collectively "Owner ") to continue to pursue Development of Regional Impact approval of the property subject of this Development Order. (The term Owner shall include its successors and assigns of each of the Owners); and WHEREAS, for the purposes of this Development Order, the "Owner" commitments set forth herein are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, it successors, and/or assigns. The "Owner" commitments herein shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc., except to the extent it is a requirement related to the land owned by same; and WHEREAS, on July 21, 2010, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, (herein "Developer "), responded to the fourth sufficiency review with a revised Application for Development Approval (ADA) of a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) now known as Hacienda Lakes filed with Collier County and the SWFRPC under the same review agency application reference numbers. (The term Developer shall include its successors and assigns); and WHEREAS, Developer has obtained all necessary approvals from Collier County agencies, departments, and boards required as a condition to Planned Unit Development zoning, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and DRI approval; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners as the governing body of the unincorporated area of Collier County having jurisdiction pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider Applications for Development Approval (ADA) for Developments of Regional Impact; and Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 2 of 56 WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 380 and the Collier County Zoning Ordinance have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the report and recommendations of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC) and held apublic hearing on the ADA on August 4, 2011 and September 1, 2011; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution No. 11 -32 and Ordinance No. which approved changes to the Comprehensive Plan as included in application No. CP- 2006 -11 for the property; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance - on , which rezoned the subject property to The Hacienda Lakes MPUD; and WHEREAS, the issuance of a Development Order pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, does not constitute a waiver of any powers or rights regarding title issuance of other development permits consistent herewith by the County or State; and WHEREAS, on , the Board of County Commissioners, at an open public hearing in accordance with Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, having considered the Application for Development Approval of a Development of Regional Impact submitted by Developer; the report and recommendations of the SWFRPC; the record of the documentary and oral evidence presented to the Collier County Planning Commission; the report and recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission; the recommendations of Collier County Staff and the Environmental Advisory Council; and the record made at said hearing, makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Hacienda Lakes, DPI-2006-AR-10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 3 of 56 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The real property which is the subject of the ADA is legally described as set forth in Exhibit "A ". 2. The application is consistent with Subsection 380.06(6), Florida Statutes, (2010). 3. The Developer submitted to Collier County, the SWFRPC, and Florida Department of Community Affairs an ADA and sufficiency responses, which are available for review at each respective agency. 4. The Developer proposes development of the Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact, as shown on the Series of Map H attached hereto as Exhibit "B ", and consisting of 2262.10 acres, which includes: A. 1,760 residential dwelling units; B. 327,500 square feet of Gross Floor Area (GFA) of retail use (convenience, general and specialty retail); C. 70,000 square feet of GFA of professional and medical office; D. A 135 -room hotel; E. 140,000 square feet GFA of Business Park or Educational Facility; F. Continuation of Junior Deputies passive recreation facilities; G. Continuation of the existing Swamp Buggy attraction, without the opportunity to include outdoor shooting ranges for firearms; H. 1,544.1 acres of preserves; I. 19.55 acres, or less if approved by the School Board, of elementary school site to serve up to 919 students; and J. 1.3 acres of Emergency Medical site. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CC PC Consent - Rev. 09 /15/11 Page 4 of 56 5. The development is consistent with the report and recommendations of the SWFRPC submitted pursuant to Subsection 380.06(12), Florida Statutes. 6. The development shall not interfere with the achievement of the objectives of the adopted State Land Development Plan applicable to the area. 7. A comprehensive review of the impact generated by the development has been conducted by the appropriate County departments and agencies and by the SWFRPC. 8. The development is not in an area designated an Area of Critical State concern pursuant to the provisions of Section 380.05, Florida Statutes, as amended. 9. The development is consistent with the current land development regulations and the Growth Management Plan of Collier County, as amended. 10. The development is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, in public meeting, duly constituted and assembled on this, the day of , 2011, that the Hacienda Lakes Application for Development Approval submitted by Developer is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. ENERGY The Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impact will incorporate the following energy conservation features as a part of each Site Development Plan or plat approval for all phases and land uses: A. Provision of a combination bicycle /pedestrian system to be placed along public arterial and collector roads within the DRI which will connect with public and private bicycle /pedestrian systems in the DRI. Hacienda Lakes, DRI - 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent- Rev. 09/15/1 I Page 5 of 56 B. Provision of bicycle racks or bicycle storage facilities in recreational, commercial, and multi- family residential areas. C. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 75,000 square feet of retail land uses, the Developer or Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop /shelter fronting the Commercial Tract C that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. The location of the CAT shelter is generally depicted and provided for on ADA Map O. Additionally, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first 70,000 square feet of business park land uses, or prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a school or educational facility in the Business Park Tract BP, the Developer shall construct, at its sole expense, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) stop /shelter fronting the Business Park Tract BP that shall include a 10'x 20' pavilion shelter with benches and protection from the elements, and include a minimum of three (3) bike racks. The location of the CAT shelters is generally depicted on ADA Map O. Owner shall be responsible for maintenance of the bus stops /shelters unless Owner elects to convey to County at no cost to County easements for the bus shelters. D. Developer and Owner shall require builders to: (1) use prevailing, practicable energy - efficient features in window design; (2) install operable windows and ceiling fans; and (3) install Energy Star qualified appliances and equipment. E. Deed restrictions, covenants, and design guidelines shall include provisions requiring compliance with H through Q. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 6 of 56 F. Minimize heat island effect (i.e.: reduce local air temperatures and reflected light and heat) by minimizing asphalt, where practicable, through the use of concrete, rock and similar substances in streets, parking lots, and other areas; by utilizing shade trees adjacent to roads and parking areas; and utilizing where practicable, high reflectance paving materials (i.e.: solar reflectance index (SRI) of at least 29). G. Installation of energy- efficient lighting for streets, parking areas, recreation areas, and other interior and exterior public areas. H. Use of water closets with a maximum flush of 1.6 gallons and shower heads and faucets with a maximum flow rate of 2.5 gallons per minute, or the use of the prevailing energy efficient bathroom fixtures available. 1. Use of native plants, trees, and other vegetation and landscape design features in accordance with Section 4.06.05D.1.a., of the Collier County Land Development Code that reduce requirements for water, fertilizer, maintenance, and other needs shall be required. J. Planting of native shade trees for each residential unit. K. Planting of native shade trees to provide reasonable shade for all recreation areas, streets, and parking areas. L. Placement of trees to provide needed shade in the warmer months while not overly reducing the benefits of sunlight in the cooler months. M. Orientation of structures, as possible, to reduce solar heat gain by walls and to utilize the natural cooling effects of the wind. N. Provision for structural shading wherever practical when natural shading cannot be used effectively. O. Inclusion of porch or patio areas in residential units. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 7 of 56 P. Consideration by the project architectural review committee(s) of energy conservation measures (both those noted here and others) to assist builders and residents in their efforts to achieve greater energy efficiency in the development. Q. The development will participate in Collier County's Single Stream Recycling (SSR) program. R. Lighting for streets, parking, recreation and other public areas shall include energy efficient fluorescent/electronic ballasts, photovoltaics, low voltage lighting, motion sensors and/or timers on lighting and full cut -off luminaries in fixtures that comply with the International Dark -Sky Association. S. The developer shall not prohibit potential home buyers to select photovoltaic cells, solar hot water heaters, green roofs and other alternative energy or energy efficient features as an option at their own expense. The above conditions shall be reported in the annual monitoring report. T. Site development shall comply with the Florida Green Building Coalition Certification Standards or equivalent green building standards, if required of all developers by Collier County. 2. HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL A. The Owner shall preserve in perpetuity the five archaeological sites 8CR556, 8CR878, 8CR881, 8CR879, and 8CR880 within Hacienda Lakes property and such sites shall be recorded as denoted AP (Archaeological Preserve) on Sheets 3 -12 in the MPUD Master Plan set. Such annotation (i.e., AP, Archaeological Preserve) shall appear on all applicable plats, and development order site plans that may be proffered in the future that are within 50 feet of the five defined archaeological sites. Hacienda Lakes, DR1- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09 /15/11 Page 8 of 56 B. In areas where the archeological sites are located in the vicinity of proposed development, a buffer or conservation easement, a minimum of 25 feet in width shall be preserved, or upon approval of County equivalent protections, such as temporary fencing or other structural barriers, shall be constructed around the archaeological sites. C. The five archaeological sites shall remain undeveloped. An access easement of 15 feet, outside the conservation easement, around the archaeological sites for potential digs and further study shall be provided by the Owner upon County request at no cost to County. Disturbance to these five protected archaeological sites may only occur with County approval, and any disturbance shall only be permitted under the direct supervision of a qualified archaeologist. D. Historical /archeological areas shall not be used to meet preserve requirements. E. The Developer shall reasonably accommodate the Florida Division of Historical Resource's (DHR) investigation of these sites by allowing access to the archaeological sites by properly credentialed investigators, whenever such access can be reasonably accommodated. F. If any additional archaeological/historical sites are uncovered during the proposed development activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of such sites shall cease immediately, and the Owner shall contact DHR, SWFRPC and Collier County so that a state certified archaeologist can determine the significance of the findings and recommend appropriate preservation and mitigation actions, as necessary. 3. HURRICANE EVACUATION /FLOODPLAINS A. (1) The following supplies and equipment shall be purchased by the Developer for Collier County Emergency Management in accordance with its specifications Hacienda bakes, DRI- 2006- AR•10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09 115/11 Page 9 of 56 and in some cases sole source provider and delivered in new condition, free on board (FOB) to the Collier County Emergency Services Center. (2) The following contributions shall be a one -time contribution in full mitigation of all requirements of the current project scope of the Hacienda Lakes DRI: (a) Two (2) new 45kw towable portable generators with heavy duty diesel engine, sound insulated, manufactured by Godwin Pump and Generator to exactly match the supplies, equipment, and power distribution systems approved and currently in use; or near the time of equipment acquisition by the Developer, as approved by the Collier County Emergency Management Department. This is a sole source procurement to ensure compatibility and parallel operations of generators within Collier County's existing fleet and insure the ability to provide essential emergency portable power to additional evacuation shelter spaces consumed by the increased shelter census created by the Hacienda Lakes DRI. Collier County will assume all maintenance, repair, and replacement of these generators following satisfactory acceptance by Collier County beyond the warranty period. Delivery of the first portable generator shall occur prior to the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy. Delivery of the second generator shall occur at the earlier of (i) 24 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy or (ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 300th residential unit within the development. (b) Two (2) new enclosed utility trailers for the storage and transport of the supplies noted above. Collier County will own and maintain these trailers and augment them with other minor disaster supplies in a fashion similar to its current disaster response unit (DRU) shelter supply delivery system. These trailers shall be new, from a Collier County approved list of vendor(s) and be at least 16 feet in length, dual axle load rated at 7,000 lbs. with trailer brakes, with laminate finish interior wall and floor finish, cabinets, shelving and Hacienda Lakes. DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09 /15/11 Page 10 of 56 load secure devices, Florida Department of Transportation approved for highway use, dropdown rear door and curbside door and extended tongue hitch length. At least one of the two trailers noted above shall include interior AC wiring, lighting, a generator connection, circuit breaker and roof mounted air conditioning to allow the empty trailer to be used for special post disaster field offices, damage assessment and relief efforts identical to the County's existing fleet of disaster supply trailers. Delivery of the utility trailers shall occur at the earlier of (i) 12 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy or (ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 150th residential unit within the development. (c) Four hundred and twenty -two (422) new military type adult folding disaster cots from a Collier County approved list of eligible vendors and approved type and style. Said cots shall be compatible with Collier County's existing storage and delivery systems and shall be provided at the earlier of (i) 48 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy, or (ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the 1200th residential unit within the development. (d) Seventy -two (72) new special needs disaster cots from a Collier County approved list of eligible vendors and approved type and style. Said cots shall be compatible with Collier County's existing storage and delivery systems and shall be provided at the earlier of (i) 36 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy, or (ii) the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 900th residential unit within the development. (e) All deeds to property located within Hacienda Lakes shall be accompanied by a disclosure statement in the form of a covenant stating that the property is located in a hurricane vulnerability zone, that the hurricane evacuation clearance time for Collier County or the Southwest Florida Region is high, and/or hurricane shelter spaces are limited. I Iacicnda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 11 of 56 B. The Developer has provided off -site hurricane shelter mitigation for the Hacienda Lakes DRI per Paragraph A above pursuant to commitments made as a result of negotiations with Collier County officials. 4. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT A. The Hacienda Lakes DRI shall require a South Florida Water Management District ( SWFMD) Environmental Resource Permit for conceptual approval of the proposed development, for construction and operation of the proposed surface water management system, and for proposed impacts to onsite wetlands and other surface waters. B. The Owner shall procure SFWMD Water Use Permits for the proposed surface and/or groundwater withdrawals for landscape irrigation and for certain dewatering activities, as determined by the SFWMD, proposed for construction of project lakes and/or road or building foundations. C. At the time of permit application, the Owner shall provide verification that the proposed system designs will meet SFWMD criteria in effect at that time. D. During construction activities, the Developer shall employ best management practices for erosion and sedimentation control. These practices shall be included with or presented on all construction plans, and shall be subject to approval by the appropriate agencies prior to their implementation. E. Any construction silt barriers or hay bales, and any anchor soil, as well as accumulated silt, shall be removed upon completion of construction. Either the Developer or the entities responsible for the specific construction activities requiring these measures shall assume responsibility for having them removed upon completion of applicable construction. F. The final stormwater management plan shall consider, as applicable, measures to reduce runoff rates and volumes, including, but not limited to, fixed control Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 12 of 56 structures, perforated pipes, and grass swale conveyances. Swales are preferred and shall be used, whenever possible, rather than closed systems. G. Any banks created along the onsite stormwater management system shall include . littoral zones constructed on slopes consistent with SFWMD and Collier County requirements and shall be planted in native emergent or submergent aquatic vegetation. H. The Developer shall conduct annual inspections of the Hacienda Lakes Master Stormwater Management System and the preserved/enhanced wetland areas on the project site so as to ensure that these areas are maintained in keeping with the final approved designs, and that the water management system is capable of accomplishing the level of stormwater storage and treatment for which it was intended. I. The Developer shall confirm to the satisfaction of all applicable federal, state, and local review agencies, and the SFWMD, that the proposed stormwater management system will not impact habitat of any state or federally listed plant and /or animal species occurring on site, or that such impacts shall be mitigated to the benefit of regional populations of those. species. J. The Developer shall undertake a regularly (every other month) scheduled vacuum sweeping of all common streets and parking areas within the development, The Developer shall encourage any private commercial parcel owners within the development to institute regularly scheduled vacuum sweeping of their respective streets and/or parking areas. K. In areas adjacent to retail and office uses, the Developer or the individual site developers, shall provide at least one -half inch of dry pre- treatment (retention or detention); or an equivalent alternative as determined by the appropriate regulatory agencies; in order to provide reasonable assurance that hazardous material will not enter the stormwater management system. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006- AR -t0147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 13 of 56 L. Ditch and swale slopes shall be designed to minimize discharges so that these facilities may provide some additional water quality treatment prior to discharge. Treatment swales shall be planted with grass or appropriate native vegetation. M. The grassed stormwater treatment areas shall be mowed as part of the normal lawn maintenance of the development. Any debris that may accumulate in project lakes, • ditches or swales, or which may interfere with the normal flow of water through discharge structures and underdrain systems, shall be cleaned from the detention/retention areas on a regular basis. Any erosion to banks shall be repaired immediately. N. The best management practices matrix and techniques shall be used in the Hacienda Lakes DRI, consistent with the requirements of the SFWMD. O. Underdrain systems and grease baffles, if utilized within the Hacienda Lakes-DRI, shall be inspected and cleaned and/or repaired on a regular basis. In no instance shall the period between such inspections exceed eighteen months. P. Stormwater management system maintenance requirements shall include removal of any mosquito - productive nuisance plant species (e.g., water lettuce, water hyacinth, cattails and primrose willows) from all system nodes, reaches and percolation basins, as well as from the lake littoral zones employed in the system. Q. To the extent consistent with applicable stormwater management system and environmental regulations, any isolated wading bird pools constructed in lake littoral zones shall be excavated to a depth which provides aquatic habitat for mosquito larvae predators, such as Gambusia affinis. R. The Owner shall conduct a predevelopment determination of surface water quality in the portion of the Henderson Creek Canal proximal to the Hacienda Lakes DRI. The water quality parameters of total phosphorous, total nitrogen, biochemical oxygen demand, Hacienda Lakes, DRI - 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 14 of 56 total suspended solids, lead, zinc, copper, and common lawn care pesticides shall be analyzed by a licensed vendor on a monthly basis at two sampling locations. The water quality monitoring program shall be conducted for an approximate five month period overlapping the dry season and wet season. S. Measures which will be utilized to mitigate potential adverse effects upon surface water and shallow groundwater at, and adjacent to, the Hacienda Lakes DRl will include all proven effective best management practices (BMP's) which are appropriate at this Hacienda Lakes DRI. More specifically, these shall include proper timing and minimum applications of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides on the common areas of the property. T. Best management practices shall also be utilized to mitigate any adverse impacts from stormwater runoff. These BMP's shall include utilization of detention ponds, vegetative systems such as grassed swales, and water quality inlets (e.g. oil /grit separators). U. The proposed surface water management system shall consist of 5 basins. Controlled discharge from basin 1, 2, 3, and 4 shall be to the large wetland located to the east of the property with the following exception. The remaining basin 5 is the Junior Deputy League and Swamp Buggy Basin, and this basin shall discharge to the Collier Boulevard Canal in a manner generally consistent with the existing water management permit for the Swamp Buggy and Junior Deputy League property. The following is a summary of the Best Management Practices that will be utilized to accomplish additional water quality treatment beyond what is required by SFWMD: i. Construction Pollution Prevention Plan outlining construction techniques and maintenance practices to reduce or eliminate the sources of stormwater pollution. ii. Urban Stormwater Management Program of non - structural controls intended to improve the quality of stormwater runoff at the source of contaminants. iii. 50% additional stormwater runoff volume to be retained. Hacienda lakes, DR1- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 15 of 56 iv. Phyto- Zones - Basins within the detention areas that provide an area for runoff into the lake to disperse, so as to allow biological pretreatment. V. Planted Littoral Zone - providing increased water quality by removing pollutant by biological uptake of nutrients and other ions. vi. Increased Flow Path- Locate inflow and outflow structures to maximize effective treatment time. V. Spreader Swale use as the last step in the discharge train to provide additional water quality and decrease erosion, based on energy diffusion (spreading of discharge over a grassed weir instead of discharging through a single pipe). W. The project shall not substantially adversely impact the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Negative impacts shall be avoided by following all regulations for water quality treatment and water quantity attenuation within The South Florida Water Management District Basis of Review Volume IV. The project shall also go above and beyond the water quality treatment by providing 150% of the required treatment. In addition, the project has been reduced from 0.15 cfs /acre per Collier County Ordinance 90 -10 to 0.06 cfs /acre. X. Developer shall install several culverts under Sabal Palm Road to improve the sheetflow across the Road from north to south. Y. The master homeowner association, or community development district shall maintain the stormwater management system. Z. The stormwater management system of the project shall be consistent with the recommendations of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council ( SWFRPC) with regard to the use of fertilizers and stormwater treatment as described in resolutions SWFRPC 07- 01 and SWFRPC 08 -011, to the extent adopted by Collier County. 5. TRANSPORTATION The following commitments shall be completed prior to the projected build -out date, or a date that may be approved extending the projected build -out date. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 16 of 56 A. The Developer shall provide efficient pedestrian and bicycle movement within and between the development's components, and to adjacent properties as reasonably deemed necessary by Collier County. B. The Developer shall promote transit service through the inclusion of bus stops or other appropriate transit access points in site design, consistent with Collier County transit plans. C. The neighborhoods shall be developed with a multi -modal street system that can accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists, thereby promoting alternative modes of transportation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. uses. D. All residences shall be within a two radial miles of the commercial land E. For the purposes of the following commitments, it must be understood that the property was divided into three main areas: North area being north of The Lord's Way extension; South area being south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road plus School; Benfield Road Improvements. The South area commitments shall be constructed in a sequential manner. However, the rest of the commitments are not sequential and can be accomplished in no specific order. Similarly, the three areas identified above are not required to be developed in a sequential manner. SOUTH AREA I. The Owner shall construct (here forward to mean "constructed to meet minimum County requirements for acceptance "), at its sole expense without road impact fee credits, the initial two lanes (south side) of Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from C.R.951 Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 17 of 56 to Florida Power Line Easement (approximately 0.25 miles). In addition, the Owner shall construct the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below and to improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the interim geometry as shown in Figure 1, below. Upon completion (here forward. to mean "completed construction to County minimum requirements, and reserved for future conveyance to the County at the County's request. ") of all of such improvements, the Owner shall be allowed to develop up to 327,500 square feet of Retail Land Uses, or Residential Pod A, or some combination of the two land uses. However, the total number of gross trips to be generated by this portion of development shall not exceed 1,409 PM peak hour trips. In the event that Residential Pod A is developed, access to Pod A will be either an internal private roadway or via an extension of Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the entrance of Pod A. These improvements and the areas allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 1, below. All of these improvements are site - related improvements. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 18 of 56 I figure 1— Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment I if. The Owner shall construct, at its own expense and without road impact fee credits, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from Florida Power Line Easement to the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds (approximately 0.25 miles) and improve the bridge on Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension over the canal to the final geometry as shown is Figure 2, below. These improvements are site-related improvements. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 20,000 Square Feet of General Office, and; Hacienda Lakes, DRI.2006-AR-10147 Approwd CCPC Conwnt - Rev, 09/15111 Page 19 of 56 50,000 Square Feet of Medical Office, and; 135 Room Hotel, and; Remaining portion of the 327,500 Square Feet of Retail (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Remaining portion of Residential Pod A (if applicable pursuant to Commitment 1), and; Required residential uses within Activity Center land use; These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 2, below. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09115/11 Page 20 of 56 111, The Owner shall construct, at its sole expense, Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension from the road leading into Swamp Buggy grounds to the future Benfield Road as a two lane road, including construction of the Rattlesnake Harnmock, Road Extension at Benfield Road intersection. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: 919 Student Elementary School, and; Residential Pod B. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved CC?C Consent - Key. 09/15/11 Page 21 of 56 Since only a portion of the capacity to be provided by this two lane section will be consumed by the Hacienda Lakes DRI, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits equal to 50% of the cost of this improvement. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction, and shall include the fair market value of the land or easement when the Owner conveys the road right-of-way to the County, free and clear of liens and encumbrances. Fair market value has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 1, below. Fifty percent (501/o) of the cost of this improvement is deemed a site-related improvement. Hacienda Takes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved CUCConsent - Rev, 09115111 Page 22 of 56 4Ll�:i jrl r% IX Fx IV. With no improvement other than a bridge to be constructed by the Owner, at its sole cost and without road impact fee credit, over the water canal that runs parallel to C.12.951 at the northern project site access, the Owner shall be allowed to develop Residential Pod C (not to exceed 300 PM peak hour trips at the connection to C.R.951). This improvement and the area allowed to develop upon, completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 4, Hacienda Lak", DR.1-2006-AR-10147 Approved CC PC Consent - Rev. 09'15111 Page 23 of 56 on below. At no time will the County accept ownership of this bridge, This improvement is a site- related improvement. IFigure 4 — Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment IV V, The Owner shall, at its sole expense and without road impact fee credits, complete the reconstruction of The Lord's Way from C.R.951 to Florida Power Line Easement and construct the extension of The Lord's Way from Florida Power Line Easement to the west entrance to the Business Park with a two lane undivided cross section. In addition, when the IlacicndaLaUi, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved CCPC Collsent - R", 09/15/11 Page 24 of 56 Collier Boulevard at The Lord's Way intersection is signalized upon meeting warrants, the cost of the signalization of this intersection will be shared proportionately among the Owner and other developments located in the area (east and west of C.R.951) and at no cost to Collier County and without road impact -fee credits. Upon completion of such road improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following additional land uses: Business Park, and; Residential Pod D. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of these improvements are depicted in Figure 5. below. When the DRI has received certificates of occupancy for 66 percent of the total commercial and residential, development authorized by the DRI, Collier County will perform an evaluation and inform the Owner if it is necessary to convey road right-of-way to the County for the section of The Lord's Way Extension from = the west entrance to the Business Park/School to Benfield Road. If Collier County requests the road right-of-way, the Owner shall convey by road easement to the County the needed road right-of-way up to aMdth of 60 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and shall receive impact fee credits equal to 100 percent of the fair market value of the road easement conveyed to the County which has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. No further certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the road easement conveyance is recorded in the public records of Collier County, If this segment of The Lord's Way is not deemed necessary (through documentation, or lack thereof, in the LRTP or the CIE) by the time the development achieves 66 percent of the total approved development quantities, this commitment shall be considered expired. Hacienda Lakes, DRI2006-Ak-10147 Approved MIC Consmt - Ikev, 09115,111 Page 25 of 56 BENFIELD ROAD IMPROVEMENTS VI. The Owner shalt construct, at its sole expense Benfield Road from Rattlesnake Hammock Road Extension to the entrance of Residential Pod E with a two lane undivided cross section and reserve the right-of-way necessary for the final 4 lane divided cross section. Residential Pod E shall be connected in a consistent manner with the County's right-of- way reservation plans or construction plans for future Benfield Road sections. Upon completion of such improvement and acceptance by Collier County of the improvement,;, the Owner shall I Jacienda, Lakes, I)RI-2DO6-AR-10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09115/11 Page 26 of 56 convey to the County a road easement for the road right-of-way needed for this section of Benfield Road up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon recordation of the road easement in the public records of Collier County, the Owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 50% of the fair market value of the road easement necessary for this section of Berifield Road and for the increase in cost resulting from the construction of the road according to County Standards (arterial) instead of as a local subdivision road. The fair market value of 50% of the road right-of-way easement to the County has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. Fifty percent (50%) of the fair market value of the road right-of-way easement and the total cost of the improvements are site-related improvements. The cost of this improvement will be determined at the time of construction. Upon completion of such improvement, the Owner shall be allowed to develop the following., additional land uses: Residential Pod E. These improvements and the area allowed to develop upon completion of this improvement are depicted in Figure 6., below, Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved CCPC Consent- Rev. 0115111 Page 27 of 56 VII. Benfield Road South of Rattlesnake Hammock Extension and north of Residential Pod E connection to Benfield Road: the Owner will convey right-of-way to Collier County by road casement for Benfield Road on areas not to be built by Owner up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. Upon such conveyance, Collier County will provide road impact fees credits for 100% of the fair market value of the road easement. The value of the right-of-way has been determined to be $30,000 per acre. The area to be conveyed is depicted in Figure 7, below. Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1 0 147 ApprovcdCCPC Consent - Rcv. 09,115111 Page 28 of 56 VIII. Benfield Road South of Sabal Palm Road: the Owner shall convey by road casement to the County the right-of-way needed for the future construction of Benfield Road south of Sabal Palm Road (approximately 1.00 mile) up to a width of 120 feet free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and at no expense to the County. In addition, the Owner shall receive no impact fee credits for such right-of-way conveyance, The area to be dedicated is depicted in Figure 8, below. I facienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approvtd CCPC Comm - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 29 of 56 8 — Hacienda Lakes DRI - Commitment VIII L gend I Right of Way to be Dedicated I IX. As part of its State and Federal pen-nits, the Owner shall pay for mitigation required for and State or Federal environmental impacts arising from the permitting for portions of Benfield Road described in Commitments VI and VII. In addition to this commitment, the Owner shall at no cost to County either: (1) Convey drainage easement(s) to the County for their stormwater management facility needs free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, or (2) agree to accept stormwater from Benfield Road into the Project's stormwater management system. These are site-related contributions, Hacienda Lakes. DRI-2006-AR-10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev, N/ 15/11 Page 30 of 56 F. At two thresholds during construction of this DRI, the Owner shall provide to Collier County a transportation analysis which compares the value of the Owner's contribution to the County's public road network against the DRI's proportionate share (as defined in the State of Florida's HB 7207) of impacted County and State road segments. if Owner's contribution is less than its impact based on the transportation analysis, then Owner shall pay to County the difference in three installments starting 90 days after the transportation analysis is agreed to by both parties, and then each 90 days thereafter until paid in full. The transportation contribution by the Developer shall be defined as the sum of all road impact fees paid to date, the costs of the non site - related transportation improvements (those receiving road impact fee credits) on Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Benfield Road and the Lords Way, plus the value of any road right -of -way conveyance by donation to the County, unless otherwise calculated as an impact fee credit. The first transportation analysis shall be submitted to the County when 33% of approved development trips (1,109 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, without projecting forward growth. The second transportation analysis will be submitted when 66% of the approved development trips (2,219 total gross trips) have been permitted based on building permit issuance, with a projection toward build out. The second analysis and reconciliation will finalize any transportation related assessments owed by the Developer for the build out of the Project. With the annual PUD monitoring report, Developer shall provide an annual trip generation analysis of trips approved by Site Development Plan approval and building permit issuance compared to total trips approved within the DRI. Upon triggering 33% or 66% as described above, Developer shall submit the transportation analysis described in this paragraph within six months. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic analysis and annual trip generation analysis required Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09 /15 /11 Page 31 of 56 by this paragraph and any payments due have been delivered to County, unless the BCC grants an extension. G. DRI traffic studies identified an off -site impact at the interchange of I -75 and S.R. 951 Ramps Intersection, specifically in the left -turn movement serving the northbound S.R. 951 to westbound (northbound) I -75 turning movement. Assessments of this operation in 2011 indicate that changes to lane usage and signage could augment the acceptable operation of the intersection and delay the impacts of the DRI. Hacienda Lakes traffic becomes significant (exceeds five percent of service volume) at this location at 46.2 percent of site traffic generation. When the first transportation analysis required under section S.F. is undertaken (e.g. at 33 percent of site traffic generation), the existing traffic flow and level of service at this location will be reviewed and projected to the build -out of the DRI. If the 2011 operational assessment is confirmed and the intersection is, or will be, operating at an unacceptable level of service as determined by County or FDOT, then the Developer will identify a solution to offset its impacts and/or restore acceptable operating conditions, and contribute its proportionate share, per section S.F., of the cost of the improvement to the appropriate government agency. If a proportionate share payment is identified as needed, the owner shall receive road impact fee credits for 100 percent of this contribution. H. If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in Subsections 111, V, VI and VII of this Article 5, Transportation, then Owner shall be entitled to a transportation impact fee credit for the value of the State and Federal environmental mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 32 of 56 this cost. The cost of State and Federal mitigation shall include land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of transportation impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County -owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the transportation impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this Subsection H. 6. VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE/WETLANDS A. The Hacienda Lakes DRI shall preserve no less than 982.89 acres of native vegetation. B. The need for wildlife crossings and fencing designs for roadways crossing of the preserve areas shall be reviewed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission ( "FFWCC ") as part of the ERP permit process. C. Review of State listed species and habitat impacts /mitigation shall be addressed in coordination with FFWCC during the ERP permit process based on specific site plan details. At a minimum, the draft Hacienda Lakes Preserve Area Management Plan submitted on March 18, 2011, shall be implemented for the preserve areas shown in the master plan Exhibit "B ". D. The Owner shall enhance the preserved wetlands and the wetland hydroperiods and shall maintain them to provide for the natural wet and dry cycles, providing foraging and habitat for wading birds. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09 /15/11 Page 33 of 56 E. The Owner shall enhance wetland and upland areas to include the hand - removal of exotic and nuisance vegetation and supplemental plantings installed in areas with greater than 50 percent exotic coverage. F. The Owner shall preserve, enhance, and place in a conservation easement the 1,544± acres of preserves, including approximately 73 percent (1,283± acres) of the wetlands on -site. In addition, 3± acres of SFWMD Other Surface Waters shall be enhanced and preserved, and shall be placed in a conservation easement or other equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the SFWMD. Approximately 982.89 acres of the preserve is required native vegetation (by Collier County), that shall be preserved, enhanced and placed in a conservation easement in favor of Collier County, but maintained by Owner. G. Prior to commencement of construction, the limits of wetland preserves shall be staked and roped to prevent encroachment by construction activities. In addition, best management practices for erosion control shall be implemented during construction of the project. Prior to commencement of construction, erosion control devices shall be installed where appropriate to control and reduce soil erosion, sediment transport, and turbidity. Such devices, which include haybale barriers, silt fencing, sediment booms, and temporary sediment traps, shall remain in place throughout the duration of construction until construction zones and surrounding areas are stabilized. H. The on -site wetland preserves shall be enhanced through exotic removal and supplemental plantings, which will result in preserves that are more suitable as foraging habitats for the listed wading birds observed on -site, as well as providing potential roosting areas. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent -Rev, 09/15/11 Page 34 of 56 I. Where a minimum 15± foot upland buffer adjacent to wetland preserves is not feasible, structural buffers as set forth in the SFWMD's Basis for Review shall be provided. Structural buffers planted with native vegetation will be used throughout the Project along all areas that border wetland preserve areas to restrict access from the development to the preserve area. Generally, in areas where development is located adjacent to the conservation area or the property line, the structural buffer will be a 15 -foot wide berm planted on the back slope with native tree, shrub, and ground cover vegetation. J. Emergent wetland acres shall be increased through. the planting of littoral zones in the lakes created as part of the development. K. Enhancement of the wetland and upland preserves shall include the removal of exotic vegetation such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and downy rose myrtle. Exotic vegetation removal shall be done by hand removal. In general, the exotics shall be treated in place with an appropriate herbicide and left standing, or exotics shall be cut, the cut vegetation removed or stacked in place, and the remaining stump treated with an appropriate herbicide. Supplemental plantings of native vegetation shall be installed in areas of greater than 50 percent exotic coverage. In addition, as part of the mitigation plan, areas of degraded wetlands, including monocultures of melaleuca, shall be enhanced through the mechanical removal of exotics, grading to wetland elevations, and planting with native vegetation. The grading plan for these areas will include the establishment of marshes for wading bird foraging habitat. These marshes shall be graded to varying depths to allow the concentration of prey for wading birds at alternating times of the year as water levels seasonally rise and recede. The surface water management system shall be designed to maintain appropriate wetland hydroperiods within the enhancement areas. The wetland hydroperiods shall be maintained to provide for the natural wet and dry cycles, to provide foraging for wading birds. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent -Rev. 09/15/11 Page 35 of 56 L. In addition to Paragraph A above, native landscaping shall be used to meet the criteria of Sub - section 4.06.05 D.l .a., of the Collier County Land Development Code which requires 75% of the required trees and 50% of the required shrubs to be native plants. M. According to the Listed Species Management Plan (revised May 2011), the wetland and upland preserves, excluding reserved right -of -ways and access easements, will be placed in a conservation easement or equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The date(s), receiver of the easement or deed title, and record reference for each conservation easement or fee - simple donation of conservation/preservation areas fled will be provided at the time of filing to the S WFRPC and referenced in the biennial DRI report. N. Review of federal listed species and habitat impacts /mitigation shall be addressed in coordination with the USFWS during the USACOE permit process or as Section 10 reviews based on specific site plan details. At a minimum, the Hacienda Lakes Preserve Area Management Plan dated May, 2011, shall be implemented for the preserve areas shown in the master plan Exhibit B" and the measures recommended by the USFWS in consultation with the USACOE for conservation of the Florida panther, wood stork, red- cockaded woodpecker, eastern indigo snake, and any other federal listed species encountered will be employed to avoid and minimize the proposed project's impact on both individual animals and their habitats. The mitigation plan for unavoidable impacts to these species, including the location, management plan, and method of assurance of permanent protection and management for these listed species and proposed actions that would minimize the likelihood of adverse human/animal interactions will be reported in the hacienda Lakes Preserve Area Management Plan and revisions thereof. O. The initial habitat restoration and preservation efforts will be conducted by the Developer prior to the anticipated deeding of the lands to the State. Hacienda lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev, 09/15/11 Page 36 of 56 P. The Owner anticipates deeding portions of the preserves to the State in order to complement the adjacent Picayune Strand State Forest. The preserve areas would be maintained in accordance with the Wetland Mitigation /Monitoring/Maintenance Plan (to be approved as part of SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit Application 100126 -5) and managed to provide habitat for listed species. In the event that the transfer of ownership to the State does not occur, the responsibility of perpetual management for these conservation areas would become the responsibility of a Home Owners Association (HOA) or another similar entity. In this case, the contract of responsibility for the HOA shall include a mechanism for perpetual funding, assurances that the approved management plan would be followed, and assurances that management activities would be conducted by a qualified entity. Q. Developer shall coordinate pedestrian access and horse trails leading to and through the Picayune Strand with the owner of the Picayune Strand. 7. UTILITIES — COLLIER COUNTY WATER SEWER DISTRICT (CCWSD) INFRASTRUCTURE A. In accordance with the current Collier County 2008 Water and Sewer Master Plan Update, the parties acknowledge that the Hacienda Lakes development may be located within the Collier County Water -Sewer District Boundaries, and; upon Board of County Commissioners approval of this Development Order Resolution , the Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance shall apply. B. Developer shall follow existing well field protection requirements identified in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) in Section 3.06.00. Developer shall show all well sites and pipeline easements located on and close to this development on all future site development plans (SDP), plans and plats (PPL) and any other site plan applications. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev, 09/15/11 Page 37 of 56 C. The project shall connect to the CCWSD potable water system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available.. D. The project shall connect to the CCWSD wastewater collection and conveyance system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. E. The project shall connect to the CCWSD Irrigation Quality water system at a location determined by CCWSD, when capacity is available. F. Should the Collier County Water -Sewer District determine that it does not have sufficient capacity to serve the project, the Developer shall either construct interim potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non - potable water facilities, or shall postpone development until such time as the Collier County Water -Sewer District service capacity is available to service the project. Any interim facilities constructed by the Developer shall be constructed to Collier County Utilities Division Standards, and shall be dismantled, at the Developer's expense, upon connection to the Collier County Water -Sewer District facilities. Whether potable water, wastewater treatment and/or non - potable water facilities are provided onsite or offsite, the Developer shall demonstrate to Collier County that adequate capacity is available at the time of final utilities plan submittal. G. Temporary septic systems may be utilized in conjunction with construction and sales offices, model homes, and rest shelters. Septic systems shall not be allowed onsite, other than for construction and sales offices, model homes and rest shelters. All temporary septic systems shall be properly abandoned and/or removed by a professional licensed to install and remove septic systems at the time when permanent or interim wastewater treatment facilities become available. H. All utility facilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Ordinance 2004 -31, and any amendments or successors thereto. Prior to commencement of Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1 0 147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09 /15/11 Page 38 of 56 construction all design and construction documents pertaining to utility facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the CCWSD. (1) The utility facility shall include but not be limited to: all construction plans, technical specifications and proposed plats, as applicable, for the proposed water distribution systems, wastewater collection and conveyance systems, irrigation quality distribution systems and any possible onsite treatment facilities. 1. All potable water infrastructures shall be conveyed to the CCWSD. J. All wastewater collection and conveyance infrastructure shall be conveyed to the CCWSD. K. All customers shall be customers of the Collier County Water Sewer District, 8. EMERGENCY, POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION. A. The Developer shall meet with the Sheriff's Department prior to initial construction, and again at least every 24- months thereafter, if requested by the Sheriff, to establish programs and incorporate crime prevention measures during each phase of the site development process. Written results of any meeting(s) shall be provided as a part of the local development order application. B. Fire protection shall be provided according to existing standards or fire flow criteria promulgated by Collier County or recommended guidelines developed by the National Fire Protection Association. C. (1) In order to mitigate for the project impacts and demand on Emergency Medical Services (EMS), the Developer shall provide a one acre parcel to Collier County. Such public facility site is identified as "PF ": on Maps H -2 and H -3 of Exhibit "B ". Hacienda Lakes, DRI-2006-AR-1 0 147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09115/11 Page 39 of 56 (2) The dedication of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County at no cost to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. (3) The valuation of the one acre site dedication has been determined to be $30,000 per acre, and such dedication shall occur at the earliest of (i) 48 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy, or (ii) no later than at the time the 500'h residential unit is included in a development order application (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. (4) If Owner conveys to County mitigated land for the real property conveyances described in this Article 8, Emergency, Police and Fire Protection, then Owner shall be entitled to an EMS impact fee credit for the value of the mitigation, as a cost of construction for public facilities. The value of the mitigation shall be a per acre value calculated at the total cost of state and federal mitigation of the environmental impacts including wetland and wildlife impacts divided by the impacted acreage of 718 acres. Developer shall provide documentation acceptable to the County to verify this cost. The cost of State and Federal mitigation shall include land costs for onsite preserves used for mitigation, environmental permitting costs, exotic removal, enhancement of preservation lands, creation of wildlife habitat, hydrological improvements and any mitigation activity required in the Army Corps of Engineers permit and South Florida Water Management District permit for the project in order to address the project's mitigation. State and Federal mitigation does not include County required mitigation. In lieu of EMS impact fee credits for environmental mitigation, the County reserves the right to transfer to Developer or Owner County -owned State or Federal panther and wetlands credits equal to the value of the EMS impact fee credits calculated pursuant to this paragraph. Hacienda Lakes, DR1- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09 /15/11 Page 40 of 56 D. Facilities qualifying under the Superfund Amendments Reauthorization Act, Title III of 1986, and the Florida Hazardous Materials Emergency Response and Community Right to Know Act of 1988, shall file hazardous materials reporting applications in accordance with Sections 302, 303 ,304, 311, 312, or 313 thereof. Applications shall be updated annually by each reporting facility. E. Any on -site facilities with commercial pool operations shall comply with appropriate codes and statutes including required safety measures such as chemical sensors, internal alarm systems, or emergency shutdown systems. F. During the site planning process, a utility master plan shall be developed that will address fire flow and the fire districts shall be consulted during the preparation of the plan. G. Portions of the commercial and residential developments may utilize natural gas as a source of energy. Coordination with the local fire departments shall occur for those developments through the site plan review process. H. Appropriate Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) strategies, as adopted by Collier County, shall be used when designing sites, buildings, streets, signs, landscaping and parking, and the County may submit such designs to the Sheriff's Office for comments and consideration during the County's site plan review process. I. The Developer shall coordinate with Collier County Public Utilities to ensure underground gas lines drawings are provided to the responding Fire Departments. 9. PHASING The project shall be developed in one overall phase that will include the entire development program. The phasing schedule is set forth on Exhibit `B ", MAPS H -2 through H -4. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 41 of 56 10. SOLIDI AZARDOUS/MEDICAL WASTE A. The Developer shall incorporate the solid waste demands of the project into the county solid waste management program and all development components (i.e.: residential, commercial et al) shall participate in all conservation practices such as recycling, trash compaction, and mechanical shredding. B. Any business located within the Hacienda Lakes DRI, which generates hazardous waste (as defined by Florida Statutes, Subsection 403.703(21) and Rule 17- 730.030, Florida Administrative Code), shall be responsible for the temporary storage, siting and proper disposal of the hazardous waste generated by such businesses. However, there shall be no siting of hazardous waste storage facilities contrary to Collier County Zoning Regulations. C. The Project shall be bound by all applicable recycling requirements effective in Collier County at the time of the development. D. Areas within buildings where hazardous materials or waste are to be used, displayed, handled, generated or stored shall be constructed with impervious floors, with adequate floor drains leading to separate impervious holding facilities which are adequate to contain and safely facilitate cleanup of any spill, leakage, or contaminated water. E. Discharge of hazardous waste effluent into the sewage system shall be prohibited unless approved by permit issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. F. All hazardous materials shall be handled, stored and applied in accordance with applicable regulations. G. All commercial uses shall meet Federal, State and local hazardous materials' compliance requirements. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 42 of 56 H. The local fire departments shall be informed, through the local government development order process, of any development where natural gas is to be used. I. There shall be no discharge of medical waste from medical facilities into the sewage system. J. Grease traps shall be required to comply with local and state codes. Additionally, the captured grease is to be hauled off by a licensed hauler. 11. SCHOOL SITE As set forth in a tri -party Developer Contribution Agreement, the Owner shall, no later than the issuance of the 500th residential building permit, dedicate to the District School Board of Collier County a 19.55 acre elementary school site, or less if agreed to by the School Board within the Hacienda Lakes DRI with the following characteristics: (a) A school site of 19.55 developable acres, or less if agreed to by the School Board, with wetland impact mitigated on the site as approved by permitting agencies, shall be provided for within the DRI; (b) Water and sewer connections shall be available at site. (c) The site shall accommodate typical 900 + /- student capacity elementary school, with other facility requirements such as parking, sidewalks, water mailagement, recreational facilities and other standard facilities. (d) The site shall be zoned for School use as part of the overall approval for the Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD. (e) The site location will be in lands designated Urban Residential Fringe in the County's Future Land Use Element, that is west of the one mile line east from County Road 951. IIaciendaLakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Conscnt - Rev. 09 /15/11 Page 43 of 56 site. (f) Students residing within the project shall be within 1.5 miles of the school (g) The Developer shall attempt to keep the school's frontage road(s) at 2 lanes for safer walking conditions. (h) The school site shall have direct legal access to a public road right -of -way. (i) School District acceptance of the dedication shall be contingent upon School Board approval and a satisfactory site feasibility study demonstrating that the land is suitable for the School District's intended use as an elementary school site with appropriate environmental conditions, usable acreage and direct legal access. (j) It is anticipated that there will be no concurrency issues at the time of development, but the project will be subject to school concurrency at the time of site development plan review. A preliminary school impact analysis estimating the total number of students by housing type generated by the Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD is estimated in the table below. Proposal: Estimated Number of Students Generated by Housing Type Dwelling Unit Type Units Elementary Middle High Total Students Single Family 704 112.64 70.40 84.48 267.52 Multifamily 1056 211.20 84.48 95.04 390.72 Mobile Home Condo/Coop 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Government Total 1760 324 155 180 658 (k) The Owner shall be compensated for the school site by way of school impact fee credits as set forth in a Tri-party Developer Contribution Agreement, the amount determined upon land valuation under a mutually agreed land appraisal mechanism and valuation Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 44 of 56 described in such Agreement to be negotiated within two years of the approval of this development order. (1) Public facilities such as parks, libraries and community centers shall be permitted to be collocated with schools. The Elementary school shall be encouraged as focal points for neighborhoods. 12. CONSISTENCY WITH THE LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A. Collier County has determined that the Hacienda Lakes DRI project is consistent with the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and that the project's phasing is consistent with the County's Concurrency Management System relative to public facilities necessary to support the project. B. The project furthers the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District objectives by severing Transfer of Development Rights ( "TDRs ") from approximately 1,517 acres of lands designated Sending Lands on the FLUM. Those Sending Lands which generate the TDRs will be placed under a permanent conservation mechanism and ultimately be deeded to a public entity, if accepted by them. C. The residential density of the proposed PUD is in compliance with the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and is limited to 1,760 single- family and multi- family residential units. The overall Project gross density will not exceed 0.78 dwelling units per acre. D. Owner and Developer will implement Policy 3.1 of the FLUE through on- site well field protection measures, preservation of Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) lands within the Project, preservation of archaeological sites within the Project, and the safe and convenient vehicular and pedestrian movement within the Project. Ilacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 45 of 56 E. Owner and Developer will implement Policy 5.6 of the FLUE through the use of clustered development and utilization of the TDR program within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. F. Owner and Developer will implement Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 of the FLUE by providing for vehicular and pedestrian interconnections with off -site public roadways and adjacent greenways. Additionally, public access and roadway easements will not be vacated to preclude access to off -site private and public lands. 13. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE A. Recreational facilities and open space will include the Florida Sports Park Swamp Buggy grounds and arena, Junior Deputy passive recreational area, lakes, trails and preserves, as well as community recreation and social spaces integrated into the residential development areas. Map I1 locates the preserves, lakes, passive recreation site, and the attraction (Swamp Buggy), but does not include open spaces within individual tracts. B. The following land uses would be permitted in the Junior Deputy Tract of the Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development: a. Principal Uses: i. Open space and recreational uses; ii. Hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; iii. Sporting and recreational camps; iv. Caretaker's residence, limited to two for the JD designated area: V. Wetland preserves; vi. Upland preserves. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 46 of 56 b. Accessory Uses: i. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: ii. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non - motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; iii. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office and restroom facilities; iv. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; V. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and/or impervious parking facilities; vi. Project identification and directional signage; vii. Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements; viii. Restrooms/bath houses: ix. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; X. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; xi. Archery and air rifle range(s). C. Public access to this Project's Preserve Tract will be consistent with the State's Management Plan, upon conveyance to a public agency. D. The Hacienda Lakes DRI will not impact a recreation trail designated pursuant to Chapter 260, F. S., and Chapter 16D -7, F.A.C. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 47 of 56 E. No parks and/or open space will be dedicated to the County. However, up to 1,549 acres of natural preserve area is intended to be dedicated to the State. The Hacienda Lakes DRI will provide a long -term restoration and maintenance program for its onsite open space and recreation lands. F. The development of the Hacienda Lakes DRI will be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan through the implementation of the County's Transfer of Development Rights program (TDR). The criteria for utilizing the TDR program will address the goals of the Natural Resources Element of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan through implementation of restoration, provision for maintenance, and dedication of high quality natural areas. The lands intended to be dedicated to the State will provide for recreation opportunities and open spaces as contemplated by the local and regional policy. G. The Developer, at a minimum, shall comply with Collier County Level Of Service requirements at the time of Development Order issuance. H. As a part of the biennial monitoring process, the Developer shall identify compliance with the requirements listed above. 14. MPUD DOCUMENT There is a MPUD Document (Ordinance ) approved by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on , which also governs the Hacienda Lakes DRI. The Developer acknowledges that the conditions and commitments of the PUD Document also govern the development and use of property within the Hacienda Lakes DRI, even though the MPUD Document (Ordinance _ ) is specifically not made a part of this Development order. Hacienda Lakes, DR1- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 48 of 56 15. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS A. All commitments and impact mitigating actions provided by the Owner within the Application of Development Approval (and supplementary documents) may be used to interpret specific conditions for DRI approval outlined above if officially adopted as conditions for approval. B. The Developer shall submit a biennial report on this Development of Regional Impact to Collier County, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, the Department of Community Affairs and all affected permit agencies as required in subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes. C. The development is on a one Phase schedule as set forth on Exhibit "B" Maps H -2 through H -4. If Development Order conditions and Developer commitments incorporated within the Development Order, ADA or sufficiency round responses to mitigate regional impacts are not carried out as indicated to the extent or in accord with the timing schedules specified within the Development Order and this phasing schedule, then this shall be presumed to be a substantial deviation for the affected regional issue unless otherwise provided in 2011 -139, Laws of Florida (2011). D. If Collier County, during the course of monitoring the development, can demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the Development Order have occurred or that the Development Order was based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the Developer, resulting in additional substantial regional impacts, then a substantial deviation shall be deemed to have occurred. The monitoring checklist form contained in Appendix IV to the SWFRPC's official recommendations for the Hacienda Lakes DRI shall be used as a guide by Collier County in determining additional substantial regional impacts. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09115/11 Page 49 of 56 E. The following land use conversions are anticipated within the DRI: (1) 1.0 residential unit equates to 2.73 Recreational Vehicle units /spaces (not to exceed 290 RV units in the entire PUD), or 4 Senior Housing Care Units (not to exceed 450 Senior Housing Care Units in the entire PUD). (2) Up to 1,232 of the total 1,760 residential units may be multi - family as defined in the Land Development Code. (3) Non - residential land use conversions may include: a conversion of retail allocation to office allocation at a one to one (1:1) ratio, not to exceed 25% of the retail land use allocation; and from the hotel allocation of 92,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet of Business Park land uses if no hotel is developed in the DRI. In no event shall the DRI exceed 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips. Any land use change that would result in an aggregate project traffic impact greater than 3,328 PM Peak Hour Trips shall require the filing of a Notice of Proposed Change, if required by applicable law at the time. (4) If any conversions are used, Developer shall provide written notification to S WFRPC and the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. 16. APPLICATION OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ORDER A. For the purposes of this Development Order, the "Owner" commitments set forth herein are applicable to Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, it successors, and/or assigns. The "Owner" commitments below shall not be enforceable upon Swamp Buggy, Inc., nor Collier County Junior Deputies League, Inc., except to the extent it is a requirement related to the land owned by same. The commitments may only be assigned by written notice to the Growth Management Division Administrator and confirmation that the Administrator has received such notice. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 50 of 56 B. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD and DRI monitoring until close -out of the PUD and DRI, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD /DRI commitments until close -out of the PUD and DRI. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Hacienda Lakes of Naples LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD and DRI by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD and DRI are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD and DRI commitments. 17. LEGAL ACCESS A. Access to Parcel "A," as described in Exhibit "C" of this document shall be via a new roadway easement from the Owner to the owner, successor, or assigns of Parcel A that includes Parcel Folio Numbers 00467320802, and 00467320501 that shall be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, and shall run in a north -south direction from the existing 30- foot roadway easement recorded in O.R. Book 857, Page 1800. This easement shall be recorded within 90 -days of approval of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. B. Access to Parcel "B," as described in Exhibit "D" of this document, shall be via the existing roadway and ingress /egress easements recorded in O.R. Book 271, Page 505, O.R. Book 6222, Page 1609, O.R. Book 245, page 124, , and O.R. Book 287, Page 18. Hacienda Lakes, DRI - 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 51 of 56 C. No existing public access /roadway easements shall be vacated to preclude reasonable access to off -site private and public lands without providing replacement access easements. This new easement shall be equivalent to the existing easement and shall be recorded concurrently with the vacation. 18. PLANNING A. Prior to the issuance of the first residential SDP or Plat Approval in the Hacienda Lakes DRI, Base TDR Credits and Early Entry TDR Bonus Credits shall be severed and redeemed from all Sending Lands to be preserved within one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe and there shall be executed and filed a Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s) for such lands at that time. B. A permanent conservation mechanism, including such Limitation of Development Rights Agreement(s), shall be attached/or applied to all Sending Lands to be preserved beyond one mile of the Urban Residential Fringe prior to final approval of the first SDP or Plat Approval for the Hacienda Lakes DRI project. C. This Development Order states the land uses approved in gross square feet, acreage and parking (if applicable) are consistent with the statewide guidelines and standards in Chapter 380.0651, Florida Statutes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: 1. The County Manager or designee shall be the local official responsible for assuring compliance with the Development Order, 2. This Development Order shall remain in effect for 15 years from the date of adoption. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 52 of 56 3. The definitions contained in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, shall control the interpretation and construction of any terms of this Development order. 4. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(15)(c)3, Florida Statutes, this project is exempt from down - zoning or intensity or density reduction for a period of 15 years from the date of adoption of the Development Order, subject to the conditions and limitations of said Subsection of the Florida Statutes. 5. The Developer or its successor in title to the subject property shall submit a report biennially, commencing two years from the effective date of this Development Order, to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, and the Department of Community Affairs. This report shall contain the information required in Section 9J- 2.025(7), Florida Administrative Code. This report shall be prepared in accordance with the "DRI Monitoring Format ", as may be amended, provided by the SWFRPC. Failure to submit the biennial report shall be governed by Subsection 380.06(18), Florida Statutes. 6. Subsequent requests for development permits shall not require further review pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes, unless it is found by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, after due notice and hearing, that one or more of the following is present. Upon a finding that one or more of the following is present, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County may take any action authorized by Chapter 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, pending issuance of an amended development order: A. A substantial deviation from the terms or conditions of this Development Order, a substantial deviation to the project development phasing schedule, a failure to carry out conditions, commitments or mitigation measures to the extent or in accord with the timing schedules specified herein, or substantial deviation from the approved development plans which Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 53 of 56 create a reasonable likelihood of additional regional impacts or other types of regional impacts which were not previously reviewed by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council; or B. An expiration of the period of effectiveness of this Development order as provided herein; or C. If the local government, during the course of monitoring the development, can demonstrate that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the Development order have occurred or that the Development Order was based on substantial inaccurate information provided by the Developer, resulting in additional substantial regional impacts, then a substantial deviation shall be deemed to have occurred. D. If Owner or Developer desires to develop "stadium, training and practice facilities for professional baseball (Group 7941) ", a Notice of Proposed Change or Substantial Deviation Application for Development Approval shall be processed in accordance with Section 380.06, F.S. or any successor statute, and this Development Order shall be amended. If state law changes such that a DRI review or other state review is no longer required, then this provision shall terminate. 7. The approval granted by this Development Order is limited. Such approval shall not be construed to obviate the duty of the Developer to comply with all other applicable local, state or federal permitting procedures, 8. It is understood that any reference herein to any governmental agency shall be construed to mean any future instrumentality which may be created or designated or successor in interest to, or which otherwise possesses any of the powers and duties of any referenced governmental agency in existence on the effective date of this Order. Hacienda Lakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent -Rev. 09/15/11 Page 54 of 56 9. Appropriate conditions and commitments contained herein may be assigned to or assumed by a Community Development District formed pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes. 10. In the event that any portion or section of this Order is determined to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions of this Order which shall remain in full force and effect. 11. This Development Order shall be binding upon the County, the Owner, and the Developer, their assignees or successors in interest. 12. This Development Order shall become effective as provided by law. 13. Certified copies of this Order shall be provided to the Department of Economic Opportunity and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council as provided in Subsection 380.06(25)(g), Florida Statutes. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and favorable vote this day of 2011. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LOU , Deputy Clerk 11aciendaLakes, DRI- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 FRED W. COYLE, Chairman Page 55 of 56 Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: I -Ieidi Ashton- Cicko Assistant County Attorney Section Chief, Land Use /Transportation Attachments: Exhibit A — Legal Description Exhibit B — Maps H -1 through H -4 including phasing schedule Exhibit C — Access to Parcel A Exhibit D — Access to Parcel B Exhibit E — ADA Map 0 CP \10- CPS - 01022 \107 I acienda Lakes, DR1- 2006 -AR -10147 Approved CCPC Consent - Rev. 09/15/11 Page 56 of 56 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION I 1 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89 °10'42 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 °1 1'14 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89 °09139 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 °1 1'01 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 013'35 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 °14'15 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87 °07'13 "E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01 °08'02 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °12'28 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01 °04'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'21 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 °18'52 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89 °22'00 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 °14'38 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89 001'58 "W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01 °01' 15 "E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89 001'58 "W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01 °01'15 "W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00 °51'54 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 037'31 "E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01 °01'15 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 037'31 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00 048'00 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF ADA Development Order Exhibit A Page 1 of 4 THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °31'38 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 148'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 028'42 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00 °48'45 "E. ALONG SAID WEST AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °27'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00 049'30 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 11; THENCE N.00 °50'27 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87 °28'56 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 149'13 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 025'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87 °25'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °47'37" W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °27'14 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °47'14 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'42 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N.87 °30'06 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 038'50 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00 °41'44 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 040'34 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 136'23 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87 °26' 11 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 935'02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 030'06 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °38'50 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °32'03 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °35'02" W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID ADA Development Order Exhibit A Page 2 of 4 FRACTION; THENCE S.87 033'59 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °38'51 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °37'27 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 142'40 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 140'54 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °56'29" W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °34'58 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 041'32 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 041'38 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °26'32 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °33'18 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °34'02 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 028'21 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88 012'42 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03 039'20 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88 °56'10 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °07'20 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 007'13 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03 °18'31 "E, FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88 056'54 "E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00 °31'35 "E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89 015'59 "E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89 057'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 037114 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 034'43 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00 041'48 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 123'00 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °22'35 "E, FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00 052'45 "E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 °46'12 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 049'34 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 157'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST ADA Development Order Exhibit A Page 3 of 4 QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 012'08 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00 059'10 "W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 022'35 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °55'57 "E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89 °46'12 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/- PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 028'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 040'10 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 117'48 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °56'29 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 023'02 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 °00'20 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- ADA Development Order Exhibit A Page 4 of 0 02 04 Mfl.s Hacienda Lakes Map H-1 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" '01 1 [A .& 11L I TA jk C"A A'"s R00( a,-- ".— 1'tiN hn r— J,y 14,201a Fu: Acaals ' E.rrmanf 170 U.1% raa uetra 1464 dik 3040 8F 'momal, 1 'A,aw SF Mf$bA m G 1,000 2,000 Feat. DA VA" fi ilR, ii a' 1 r` 1— A6M.tEYE OPMENt'nRGER E%Y9bIT"a` - vnwdmax (artiFms�F.7kt � °Y�1 ':- riu�t.At�j�t.op tY Ywc ;. mw„t�m�uM�LV.LD4 @Y ,: amq:. ■ t Legend L Residential (R) RV Development Area (RV) Project Boundary Urban Rasidential Fringe Subdistrict o Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Preserve Tract (P) is" Flap H-3 for details) ("a Map H-4 for details) Attraction Tract (A) ' Public ROW Reservation (ROM Junior Deputy (JO) u EPL. Easement Acct�a -�. Eaoeman4 ` School (S) 'ZCommercial (C) ° -o "` "` R Residential f Medical Use (RIMU) Public Facilities Tract (EMS) R i R or R' Business Park (HAP) Pwpatad ArAOits -.,. 1 PF's Roads uswa P - -TECO People's Gas Main Lines ROW P Henderson Creek Canal FPL —Collier County Major Roads Pr"owe E!tAifE cK �,�... V4 Mi. Support �.., w Med),Al tlsr �bt CGiliof tioglGn31 R R , Medlral.Certtm l w 1# � t Eaaemani &TATS Acaals ' E.rrmanf 170 U.1% raa uetra 1464 dik 3040 8F 'momal, 1 'A,aw SF Mf$bA m G 1,000 2,000 Feat. DA VA" fi ilR, ii a' 1 r` 1— A6M.tEYE OPMENt'nRGER E%Y9bIT"a` - vnwdmax (artiFms�F.7kt � °Y�1 ':- riu�t.At�j�t.op tY Ywc ;. mw„t�m�uM�LV.LD4 @Y ,: amq:. ■ pwok em r..1 awe) ft-ikftm I M.Otm U" JRMJI cAmawlda fcj TWO PAO** rue Mah L4*s Proposed Access FPL Easement fro PF THE LORD'S WAY ROW Henderson Creek Canal PROP. RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD. EXT FPL Easement' Collier Regional Medical Center Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (see Map H-4 for details) BOUNDARY VF TRACT 'I ALLOWING R T T / RV USES R c or RV 9- 0 4w Goo Hacienda Lakes Feet Map H-3 4 A. ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B (Revised 9-7-11) N M ■ M ■I ES-nMATM 0EVELq"gNT�q#FQULE — 6ft 0. V- EF --- SF cow D 0 5f M0 -Sf- '.t:�SFa 4F 0 �"' of It am 6 too SP 0.0 -SF Iwo V ::74NS;-- —I-- - - "SF 2a ISF W. 7W twu 1,M U.16 MAN &F 70'a"SF 14co" af I" swo"ft Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (see Map H-4 for details) BOUNDARY VF TRACT 'I ALLOWING R T T / RV USES R c or RV 9- 0 4w Goo Hacienda Lakes Feet Map H-3 4 A. ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B (Revised 9-7-11) N M ■ M ■I im 0 # - Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (see Map H-3 for details) R rU'T�NTC)FS Accses Easement y/ y 7 Hacienda Lakes 0 800 1,600F ut Map H-4 A,xTW) ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" "x;. {Revised 9 -7 ww tir+y..wenmxe„aiiv.4tib}, tlowCV�p+w�..�t}M1..akw2aa+wn: "T11MTED DEVELOPMENTSCHEDULE. ibOY FlctlCe Mwl h -F.,6I 91wtl�FFam Ftaare {SRµs_ yina+Pffirls 3Manad._,. _ 3tt wm : m 37 I. zt 0.0 SP 0 Q 8F "�. ,24i3 .. . 2W Vn% A"4 LAMw :1W 1YNs _ IPA AR1S�F '. .n.. 048E �0� 205Ut{w 100 M1kwtw -; NS10i7C5 `` XtF 29C ucs L" i 1 lkds C 0 F 25 ow $F d 4 Sa.... 2�G'78 2 LAtk M1jiSikaw _. 150 t}iA+ F 334 _ 4 " ....853 VKM1Z Un6s '3S761h1w %27,dW SF PO.COtl §F.. ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE ,.,,... Oro tM1dwOgal 'Mu1NFwm1 Refit U00F _ omw Budnb`Y Fti _ — , ^.. —... 1$ i$4.4b4 25:LMAw ti;rww ttAm 25,Idfn 2b b 0C' 0 F DA £F� S 81wa4n4s 8Fm .2097 27g 4Yi4 i Lww OGSF 0$""" SF - -- 2016 nUnto 100LNks 2014 210Jffis StO U*di �4 Jnits SSA ltrn`y_...___�, 0 iCL.'2gJ SF�_8!8b1 T.W. 1760 UNKI 70d UwA. 1,959 U,iw 727,SZXF 70.00n SF 12rz0003F 6104w w. ?ha t35 PM hw Owpw4lm b. 10 (opdm st.pa Cra rn:W14, "7M gdlers" ffi vea4 M1aJ F'arF may bo tl".w 1151 C.. w 2015 R rU'T�NTC)FS Accses Easement y/ y 7 Hacienda Lakes 0 800 1,600F ut Map H-4 A,xTW) ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "B" "x;. {Revised 9 -7 ww tir+y..wenmxe„aiiv.4tib}, tlowCV�p+w�..�t}M1..akw2aa+wn: ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "C" PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00059'10"W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89022'35"W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00055'57"E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNIER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89'46'1 2"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10,9 ACRES +/- ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT C Page I of 1 ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT "D" PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87'28'21 I "L. ALONG THE NOR TH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00'40'10"W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87'17'48"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356,51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00'56'29"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87023'02"W, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01'00'20"E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87028'21"E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- ADA DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXHIBIT D Page I of I 0 540 1,0300 EXHIBIT Foot Hacienda Lakes Map � at one wr*rosstwry (Revised 8- 26 -11) 'N� ts.. °nyewuuxi�M,,rx of m Haamtrush�,`Rawawau,ea Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal APPLICATION Planning Visualization CONSU I, FI NG Engineering 1 \ V 1L , Surveying Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTIONS 2 & 3 APPLICATION INFORMATION -DZA TAINC.e.,;. a CONSULT ING, Engineering 1 \ , .L JL Surveying QUESTIONS 2, 3 —APPLICATION INFORMATION 2. Owner /Developer (name, address, phone). State whether or not the owner or developer is authorized to do business in the State of Florida pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 407, F.S. Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC 3921 Prospect Ave Naples, Florida 34104 (904) 762 -4454 Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC is a limited Liability company organized under the laws of the State of Florida, filed on July 14, 2009. The document number of this company is L09000067527. 3. Authorized Agent and Consultants (name, address, and phone). Mr. Dwight Nadeau, AICP RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 Naples, Florida, 34109 (239) 597 -0575 Office (239) 597 -0578 Fax Mr. Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, # 300 Naples, Florida 34103 (239) 435 -3535 ext 256 Office (239) 435 -1218 Fax Mr. Kenneth C. Passarella Passarella and Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274 -0067 Ext. 15 Office (239) 274 -0069 Fax Mr., Robert Mulhere, AICP, President /CEO Mulhere & Associates P.O. Box 1367 Marco Island, Florida (239) 825 -9373 Office/Mobile Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppert\Hearings \Q2 and 3 \Questions 2, 3 Application Information (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q2 &3 Pg. 1 Mr. Owen Beitsch Real Estate Research Consultants, Inc. 14 East Washington Street Suite 500 Orlando, Florida 32801 (800) 767 -5635 Office (407) 839 -6197 Fax Mr. Brian Barnes, Senior Scientist Water Resource Solutions, a Division of ENTRIX, Inc. 1388 Colonial Boulevard Fort Myers, FL 33907 239) 574 -1919 Ext. 7004 Office (239) 574 -8106 Fax Mr. Richard S Tomasello, P.E. Tomasello Consulting Engineers, Inc. 5906 Center Street Jupiter, FL 33458 -3973 (561) 575 -3910 Office (561) 744 -1865 Fax Mr. William E. Oliver, Senior Vice President Tindale- Oliver & Associates, Inc. 1000 N. Ashley Drive Suite 100 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 224 -8862 Office (813) 226 -2106 Fax Dr. Robert Carr Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. Suite 107 Davie, FL 33314 (954) 792 -9776 Office (954) 792 -9954 Fax Ronald Weaver, Esquire Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterso, P.A. 401 East Jackson Street Suite 2200 Tampa, Florida 33602 813 - 223 -4800 Office Q813 - 222 -5089 Fax Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q2 and 3 \Questions 2, 3 Application Information (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q2 &3 Pg. 2 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTIONS 4, 5, 6 & 7 DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Planning Visualization COf,. C�I.Ti�IC, Engineering i \ ► ►1 \ Surveying QUESTIONS 4 - 7 — DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION 4. Attach a notarized authorization from all persons or corporations (or authorized agents of said persons or corporations) having fee simple or lessor estate in the site indicating that each of these parties is aware of, and concurs with, the development of this property as described in this Application for Development Approval. Include the names and addresses of all parties with an interest in the property. In addition, include descriptions of any other properties within one -half mile radius of the DRI site in which any of the parties with an interest in the DRI site hold a fee simple or lessor interest. Response: Please see attached notarized authorization(s). 5. Attach a legal description of the development site. Include section, township and range. Response: LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF COLLIER, LYING IN SECTION 11 THROUGH 14 AND 23 THROUGH 25, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST AND SECTION 19 AND 30, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING FURTHER BOUND AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.89 010'42 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2835.68 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 °11'14 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2906.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE S.89 009'39 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2693.18 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.89 °11'01 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 2693.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 °13'35 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 2636.34 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.00 014'15 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 2637.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.87 007'13 "E. ALONG A LINE COMMON TO SAID SECTION 24 AND 25 FOR 1704.07 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.01 °08'02 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 684.58 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 012'28 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 340.01 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.01 °04'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2052.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °28'21 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2025.64 FEET TO THE Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI- ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SuppomHearings \Q4, 5, 6, and 7 \QUESTIONS 4 -7 Development Information.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q4 -7 Pg. 1 QUARTER CORNER COMMON TO SAID SECTIONS 23 AND 24; THENCE S.89 °01'58 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 1328.51 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 °18'52 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 679.65 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.89 °22'00 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 663.28 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 014'38 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 675.75 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S.89 001'58 "W. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 664.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUE S.89 001'58 "W. ALONG SAID LINE FOR 627.16 FEET; THENCE N.01 001'15 "E. FOR 1699.99 FEET; THENCE S.89 001'58 "W. FOR 701.42 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF A 170 FOOT WIDE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE S.01 001'15 "W. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 68.31 FEET; THENCE S.89 001'58 "W. FOR 1232.97 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID COLLIER COUNTY; THENCE N.00 °51'54 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 956.27 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 30.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °3731 "E. ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1237.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.01 001'15 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 30.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 °37'31 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1337.24 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.00 °48'00 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2683.32 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 031'38 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 334.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °48'11 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1341.38 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 028'42 "W. ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 1002.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT; THENCE N.00 048'45 "E. ALONG SAID WEST AND EAST LINE FOR 335.13 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °27'58 11W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1236.32 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 21, AT PAGE 183; THENCE N.00 049'30 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 1004.62 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q4, 5.6, and 7 \QUESTIONS 4 -7 Development Infonnation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q4 -7 Pg. 2 11; THENCE N.00 150'27 "E. ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR 344.07 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N.87 028'56 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1235.95 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °49'13 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 342.92 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 025'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 1336.32 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE CONTINUE N.87 °25'45 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 668.16 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °4737 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.11 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14; THENCE N.87 027'14 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 668.22 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °47'14 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.39 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 028'42 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 1336.55 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; ® THENCE N.87 030'06 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1328.72 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 038'50 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.26 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N.00 °41'44 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2707.07 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °40'34 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1321.29 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °36'23 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2701.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION SAID POINT BEING THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S.87 °26'11 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 662.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 035'02 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1345.93 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °30'06 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 664.36 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND SAID SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 038'50 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.63 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 032'03 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 035'02 "W. ALONG THE EAST QLINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 672.97 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q4, 5. 6, and 7 \QUESTIONS 4 -7 Development Infotmation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q4 -7 Pg. 3 FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °33'59 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 665.81 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 038'51 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 1345.10 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 °37'27 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 667.27 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °42'40 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION AND AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 040'54 "E. ALONG SAID NORTH LINE FOR 2006.20 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 °56'29 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1368.25 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 034'58 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1343.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °41'32 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1365.31 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 041'38 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER FOR 1337.58 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.00 °26'32 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION FOR 1703.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 033'18 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 672.60 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 034'02 "W. ALONG SAID WEST LINE FOR 1022.89 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 674.89 FEET TO THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 19; THENCE S.88 012'42 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER FOR 3093.52 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.03 °39'20 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2676.74 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.88 056'10 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 2940.59 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °07'20 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 25 FOR 2726.50 FEET TO THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.87 °07'13 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER FOR 807.16 FEET; THENCE S.03 018'31 "E. FOR 1451.00 FEET; THENCE N.88 °56'54 "E. FOR 1582.00 FEET; THENCE S.00 031'35 "E. FOR 1130.61 FEET; THENCE S.89 015'59 "E. FOR 1823.18 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE N.89 °57'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2200.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.00 037'14 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1344.51 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °3443 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 365.01 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE WEST HALF OF THE Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q4, 5, 6, and 7\QUESTIONS 4-7 Development Information.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q4 -7 Pg, 4 SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.00 °41'48 "W. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 671.03 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 023'00 "E. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 364.14 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 °22'35 "E. FOR 710.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.00 052'45 "E. FOR 1334.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 °46'12 "W. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 049'34 "E. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF FOR 668.60 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.89 057'58 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR 2497.82 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE S.01 ° 12'08 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION FOR 2640.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 101,084,043 SQUARE FEET OR 2,320.6 ACRES +/- LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCELS: PARCEL "A" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF SAID SECTION 30; THENCE S.00 059'10 "W. FOR 1329.95 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE S.89 022'35 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 355.05 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °55'57 "E. FOR 1332.36 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF; THENCE N.89 146'12 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 356.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 473,270 SQUARE FEET OR 10.9 ACRES +/- PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SAID SECTION 24; THENCE N.87 °28'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1349.77 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.00 °40'10 "W. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1361.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S.87 017'48 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 1356.51 Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q4, 5.6, and 7\QUESTIONS 4-7 Development Information.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q4 -7 Pg. 5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.00 °56'29 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 682.86 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S.87 °23'02 "W. ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 338.41 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.01 °00'20 "E. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 683.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N.87 028'21 "E. ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 337.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2,072,100 SQUARE FEET OR 47.6 ACRES +/- REV 6 -24 -10 6. Have you requested a binding letter of interpretation of DRI status or vested rights, clearance letter, agreement or preliminary development agreement from the Department of Community Affairs? If so, what is the current status of this determination? Response: A binding letter of interpretation of DRI status or vested rights, clearance letter, agreement or preliminary development agreement from the Department of Community Affairs has not been requested. 7. List all local governments with jurisdiction over the proposed development. Response: Collier County and South Florida Water Management District are the only local governmental agencies that have jurisdiction over the proposed development. Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings\Q4, 5, 6, and 7 \QUESTIONS 4 -7 Development Infomtation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q4 -7 Pg. 6 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 8 PERMIT INFORMATION DAA[A, �vi a,nmfion CONSUI,l INN, Engineering 1\ I VA 1 Surveying UESTION 8 — PERMIT INFORMATION 8. List all agencies (local, state and federal) from which approval and/or a permit must be obtained prior to initiation of development. Indicate the permit or approval for each agency and its status. Indicate whether the development is registered or whether registration will be required with the Division of Florida Land Sales, Condominiums and Mobile Home under Chapter 478, Florida Statues. Indicate whether the development will be registered with the H.U.D., Division of Interstate Land Sales Registration or with other states. Resnonse: AGENCY PERMIT STATUS US Army Corps of Engineers Corp Permit Corps permit application submitted on 1/28/2010, Application Number SAJ 2010 -262 South Florida Water Management District Environmental Resource Permit ERP submitted to SFWMD 1/26/2010, Application Number 100126 -5 Dewatering Permit Water Use Permit Early Work Permit Right of Way Florida Department of Environmental Protection Notification/Application for Constructing a Domestic Wastewater Collection/Transmission System Rule 62-604.600(7), F.A.C. Notice of Intent to Use The General Permit for Construction of Water Main Extension for PWSs Rule 62- 555.405, F.A.C. Remediation Permit Department of Health Septic Well Collier County LDC 10.02.04 Plans and Plat LDC 10.02.03 Site Development Plan LDC 4.06.04 Excavation Permit LDC 4.06.04 Vegetation Removal and Site Fill Demolition Permit Building Permit Right of Way Early Work Authorization Temporary Use Permit Remediation Permit PT D MPUD submitted to Collier County in July of 2006 as Toll - Rattlesnake MPUD, Application Number PUDZ- 2006 -AR -1 -146. Resubmitted on March 24, 2010 as Hacienda Lakes. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPLID- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Suppon\Hearings \Q8 \Question 8 Permit Information.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q8 Pg. 1 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal PART II GENERAL SECTION T \I / / \ rvC.PI —i zanun CONS II LT'INC: Engineering 1 \ 7 V.& 1 Surveying PART II. GENERAL SECTION (QUESTION 9 — MAPS The following maps must be provided as a part of the ADA. The appropriate scale for each map should be determined at the pre - application conference. Map A. A general location map. Indicating the location of any urban service area boundaries and regional activity centers in relation to the project site. Map B. A vertical aerial photo of the site showing project boundaries which reasonably reflects current conditions. The aerial photo imagery was captured in January, 2009. Map C. A topographic map with project boundaries identifying five and ten foot contour intervals. One - hundred year flood prone areas are delineated, including hurricane flood zones. Map D -1. A land use map showing a broad view of existing and approved uses on and abutting the site, and regionally significant resources. Map D -2. A land use map zoomed to Project area showing existing and approved uses on and abutting the site, and shows historic, archaeological significant resources and lands Qheld for conservation purposes. is Map E. A soils map of the site prepared utilizing the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service (SCS) soil surveys. Map F -1. Aerial FLUCFCS Map. A vegetation associations map indicating the total acreage of each association, based on the Level III vegetation types described in The Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System. Map F- 1N.Aeria1 FLUCFCS Map of northern half of Project. Map F -1 S. Aerial FLUCFCS Map of southern half of Project. Map F -2. Aerial Wetlands Map. An exhibit based on the vegetation associations map that delineates the SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands. Map G -1. Aerial Listed Species Location Map. An exhibit that depicts the approximate locations of survey transects and listed species observed on the Project site between 2002 and 2006 (for Toll- Rattlesnake DRI). Map G -2. Aerial Listed Species Location Map. An exhibit that depicts the approximate locations of survey transects and listed species observed on the Project site in 2009. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Cakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q9 \Question 9 Maps.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q9 Pg. 1 Map H -1. Future Land Use Map. A map generated utilizing the future land use designations as depicted on Collier County's Future Land Use Map that depicts the project boundaries and limits of development. Map H -2. Master Development Plan. Indicating the proposed land uses and locations, development phasing, and public roads. Map H -3. Master Development Plan (Enlarged view). Indicating the proposed land uses and access locations in the northwestern portion of the proposed DRI. Map H -4. Master Development Plan (Enlarged view). Indicating the proposed land uses and access locations in the easterly portion of the proposed DRI. Map I -1. Existing Drainage Map: Delineating existing: drainage basins, flow direction, flow route offsite, waterways, and other major drainage features Map 1 -2. Proposed Drainage Map: Delineating proposed: drainage basins, flow direction, water retention areas, drainage structures, flow route offsite, waterways, and other major drainage features. Map I -3. Project relationship to Regionally Significant Resources. Map J. Transportation Existing Road Network: A map of the existing highway and transportation network within the study area. The study area includes the site, and locations of all transportation facilities which are substantially impacted. Map K Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Figure 10 -2; Collier County 2030 Highway Needs Plan. The 2030 Collier County Needs Plan for roadway improvements. Map L LRTP Figure 12 -1; 2030 Constrained Financially Feasible Plan. This Financially Feasible Plan illustrates the highway component by number of travel lanes based solely on current sources of revenue. Map M Wilson Boulevard /Benfield Road corridor exhibit. This Map depicts the future public corridor alternatives and proposed interface with DRI lands. Map N Pedestrian Facilities Master Plan: Depicts the general circulation of internal pedestrian and bicycle facilities and their connection to off -site public pedestrian and bicycle faculties. Map O Transit Master Plan: Depicts the Project linkage with existing Collier Area Transit routes. Q;\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppoi4\Hearings \Q9 \Question 9 Maps.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q9 Pg. 2 0 0.5 1 Hacienda Lakes Miles Map A a "DA / \INC. CONSULTING AL %. T Tl 1 • Planning • Visualization Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rjones Printing Date: July 14, 2010 File: T: \Projects \2005 \05_0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakes\ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda A Location.mxd PE Hacienda Lakes Map B 0.25 0.5 Miles N DIVA INC, CONSUL'I'1 \ C3 1 ♦T fl jL • Planning • Visualization Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rmjones Printing Date: May 17, 2010 File: T: \Projects\ 2005 \05_0150.02.03_HaciendaLakes\ ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda_B_Aer. mxd Source: Aerial (Collier County PA, Date Flown: Jan. 2010) rA" A7 Hacienda Lakes Map C Dedel ¢m t / re i a State a s r "e" 0 0.25 0.5 Miles N Legend Project Boundary Preserve Boundary — EOC Evacuation Routes Contour Elevations 5 10 ® AREA LOCATED OUTSIDE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA AREA LOCATED WITHIN SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA STORM SURGE ELEVATIONS 4.1' to 6.2' Tropical Storm 4.6' to 7.8' Category 1 7.4' to 11.9' Category 2 10.1' to 16.5' Category 3 14.2' to 22.3' Category 4+ /I DA / -INC. CONSULIANG 1 \ T T 1 -planning -Visualization Civil Engineering • Surveying R Mapping Prepared By: hones Printing Date: June 18, 2010 File: T: \Projects \2005 \05_0150.02.03_ Hacien da La kes \ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda_C_Topo. mxd CITRUS GARDENSOAK GROVE VINEYARDS (O FIRST BAP. IST CHURCH OF NAPLES 2F 09�' - -.. - - -- FW '. VINEYARDS SUMMER - CYPRESS WIND GLEN NAPLES GATEWAY PINE RIDGE.RDCLE ' ! NAPLES LAKES ROYAL WOODS G&C CLUB COUNTRY CLUB G G RATTLESNAKE HUNTRJGTON WOODS HAMMOCK HAMMOCKRD MANDALAY rn PINa SUTHE RLA w AST RON PLAZA ZR RELATED OUP PINE VIEW COLLEGE-WOOD j BALE IDGEPINE RIDGE CENWEST LELY PALMS a BRYNWOOD WHIPPOILL O :OMMUNITY � PRESERVE LAKES 0 1-DICALC NTER YA = WH IPPOOR ILL PINES LELY COUNTRY CLUB EDISON V ARLINGTON. 1 FP8 TAKES � SUNGATE WORLD TENNIS CENTER WHIPPOOR BALMORAL WOODS LELY SA' - -GREEN BLVD. 0 LIVINGSTON VILLAGE TESA POINTE Y O W K 16.LP��� COLLIER DRI O WYNDEMERE IZF,GtIQ ALJL��{{` m SILVER LAKES pS/(.GG�'N�iFy.A)CtIrR GOLDEN GATE VILLAS -- -- A S HLEYS11AS STATION NAPLES PARKWAY RNERS )DND 5PLAZA SANTA BARBARA �D J GOLDEN GATE COMMEI ICE PARK CITY GATE DRI HERON LAKES .MAGNOLIA POND COLLIER II MIXED USE COMMERCE CENTER BRIARWOOD - - -- - GREEN HERON SADDLEBROOK SHERWOOD PARK �GATE KE INDUSTRIAL CORP. PARK MAPLEWOOD EAST GATEWAY BERKSHIR LAKES 1 -75 /ALLIGATOR ALLEYTOLI O MMERCIAL TRIAD RADI - - BRETONNE PARK I Q w - 7"COLLIER B LEVARD COMME CIAL CENTER EAST TOLL PLAZA SUMMERWOOD F g GALLMAN OLDS ALERSHIP TOLL PLAZA RV_ ➢AR SAXON. MANOR ISLES LEAWOOD LAKES 4 WESTPO COMMERCE CENTER IUTOHAUS SANTA BARBARA GS< FOXFIRE IDGE j CEDAR HAMMOCK G& C CL B MOON LAKEWHITTENBERG ESTATES WID ESTATES SPRINGWOOD WHITTENBERG F FOREST GLEN OF NAPLES OSPREYS LANDING NEW INISTRIES A.I vD SHOPPES TA BARBA - - ....... -- WINTER PARK NORTH i NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB WINTER PARK j - - LOCH RIDGE CROWN POINTESEAC EST UPPER AND LOWER SCHOOL DEVOE PONTIAC Y SAN MARINO 1 GALLMAN ESTATE ¢ FALLING WATERS s NAPLES NAT'L GOLF CLUB A Y WEST CROWN POINTE M m� 1 THE CLUB ESTATES -' p F U o - -- WATERFORD ESTATES. - - -. j YOUTH HAVEN 1 O RIVIERAGOLFU STATES SHADOWWOOD F IRST ASSV SWAMP 11 a MINST. BUGGY1 E U & REHAB DAYS 61 LAKE AVALON TNOMASSON DR. ST. PETER'S CATHOEIC CHURCH WINDSO NAPLES LAKES ROYAL WOODS G&C CLUB COUNTRY CLUB G G RATTLESNAKE HUNTRJGTON WOODS HAMMOCK HAMMOCKRD MANDALAY OD TURN ENTER ARK MC LEN r 1f L S 1 COLLEGE-WOOD j E. NAPLES 1 1 LELY PALMS COLLEGE PARKSIERRA MEADOW i :OMMUNITY COLLIER REGIONAL 1-DICALC NTER j PARK LELY COUNTRY CLUB EDISON V LLAGE 1 EAGLE CREEK � j 1.� LELY ' ` ' ` ' ' •` ' ' ' ' ' ' "` ROCKEDG TESA POINTE '. QUARE 16.LP��� COLLIER DRI BUSINESS CENTER ROIERYBAISNA? IONA E +` IZF,GtIQ ALJL��{{` SILVER LAKES pS/(.GG�'N�iFy.A)CtIrR PELICAN LAKE CHAMPION U LAKES i .. i / LELY RESORT MICEL i j i MYRTLE W ODS 1 j TREETOP HISTLERS COVE 1 WINDING i CYPRESS i DRI VINCENT11 I! • O•P rqb 1 1 i i i NAPIES RESERVE GOLF CLUB, INC. i 1 1 NALNUT LAKES RV RESORT',,, CHARLEE •�� - - - -- - - -- MARCO SHORES/ FIDDLER'S CREEK £S UAR BAY Hacienda Lakes Map D -1 0 0.5 1 Miles N WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER B �OlyF'Q3 I i i j 1 1 1 1 1 1 j 1 x e p i BELLE MEADE e REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE #5 1 i i PICAYUNE STRAND STATE FOREST REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE #2 Legend PROJECT BOUNDARY - COLLIER COUNTY MAJOR ROADS ? - - -y PICAYUNE STRAND STATE FOREST - -- REGIONALLY SIGNICANT RESOURCE #2 COLLIER COUNTY PUD'S ROOKERY BAY NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE #41 n BELLE MEADE REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE #5 BELLE MEADE FLORIDA FOREVER PROJECT - i HENDERSON CREEK /BELLE MEADE RESTORATION PROJECT 1 i A 1 i 1 i i 1 1 / "DA /, / / `INC. c t1 \SLlLT't]NG 1. t 1 T1 .L •Planning -Visualization Civil Engineering -Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rjones Printing Date: June 18, 2010 File: T \Projects \2005 \05_0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakeSWDA \Rev01 \Hacienda D LandUse 9]� 1 S 1 t VICTORIA FALL 1 1 i FALLING WATERS 1 ACH RESORT EAGLE CREEK � • ' ` ' ` ' ' •` ' ' ' ' ' ' "` LANDS END PRESERVE TESA POINTE _ RI(vERBEND BUSINESS CENTER ROIERYBAISNA? IONA E +` IZF,GtIQ ALJL��{{` SILVER LAKES pS/(.GG�'N�iFy.A)CtIrR PELICAN LAKE CHAMPION U LAKES RV RESORT',,, CHARLEE •�� - - - -- - - -- MARCO SHORES/ FIDDLER'S CREEK £S UAR BAY Hacienda Lakes Map D -1 0 0.5 1 Miles N WILSON BOULEVARD CENTER B �OlyF'Q3 I i i j 1 1 1 1 1 1 j 1 x e p i BELLE MEADE e REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE #5 1 i i PICAYUNE STRAND STATE FOREST REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE #2 Legend PROJECT BOUNDARY - COLLIER COUNTY MAJOR ROADS ? - - -y PICAYUNE STRAND STATE FOREST - -- REGIONALLY SIGNICANT RESOURCE #2 COLLIER COUNTY PUD'S ROOKERY BAY NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE #41 n BELLE MEADE REGIONALLY SIGNIFICANT RESOURCE #5 BELLE MEADE FLORIDA FOREVER PROJECT - i HENDERSON CREEK /BELLE MEADE RESTORATION PROJECT 1 i A 1 i 1 i i 1 1 / "DA /, / / `INC. c t1 \SLlLT't]NG 1. t 1 T1 .L •Planning -Visualization Civil Engineering -Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rjones Printing Date: June 18, 2010 File: T \Projects \2005 \05_0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakeSWDA \Rev01 \Hacienda D LandUse CEDAR HAMMOCK G & C CLUB NAPLES HERITAGE G &CC NAPLES NATT GOLF CLUB HOMES OF ISLANDIA LASIP CONSERVATION AREA NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD SIERRA MEADOWS EDISON VILLAGE LELY RESORT FALLING WATERS BEACH RESORT g7 Hacienda Lakes Map D -2 FOREST GLENN OF NAPLES SAN MARINO Existing Wells FIRSTASSY. MINST EDU. & REHAB. THE LORD'S WAY GOODTURN CTR HAMMOCK PARK n Preserve Development L Area )Preserve ishell Cove Midden SWAMP Hunti BUGGY d Cam DAYS Hamm d N SD a CTR Existing Wells Development COLLIER Area REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR ROCKEDGE SABAL PALM RD WINDING CYPRESS Preserve h A I . Preserve State Lands Preserve Preserve Jump Start tmmock White Shell Hammock Preserve Deep Marsh Hammock Preserve Silver Hard Hat 0 1,000 2,000 Feet 2A N 'DA"X / / \INC. CONSULTING Z \ I Tl JL • Planning • Visualization -Civil Engineering •Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rmjones Printing Date: June 25, 2010 File: T: \Projects \2005 \05 0150.02.03 HaciendaLakes\ ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda D2 Landuse.mxd Legend PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED WELLS w DEVELOPMENT BOUNDARY PICAYUNE STRAND STATE FOREST REGIONALLY SIGNICANT RESOURCE #2 n COLLIER COUNTY PUD'S y BELLE MEADE REGIONALLY SIGNIFICAN RESOURCE #5 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE e� CHANNELS - COLLIER COUNTY MAJOR ROADS NAPLES RESERVE GOLF CLUB 0 1,000 2,000 Feet 2A N 'DA"X / / \INC. CONSULTING Z \ I Tl JL • Planning • Visualization -Civil Engineering •Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rmjones Printing Date: June 25, 2010 File: T: \Projects \2005 \05 0150.02.03 HaciendaLakes\ ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda D2 Landuse.mxd Legend /�..,` �.—�` �.•._1 �� PROJECT BOUNDARY SOIL # DESCRIPTION 2 HOLOPAW FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM. HYDRIC ��> t 4 CHOBEE, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUMAND DANIA MUCKS, DEPRESSIONAL, HYDRIC z:.. t 6 RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM - COPELAND FINE SAND, HYDRIC 10 OLDSMAR FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, NON -HYDRIC 11 HALLANDALE FINE SAND, NON -HYDRIC r] 14 PINEDA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, HYDRIC 64, 18 RIVIERA FINE SAND, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, HYDRIC 20 FT. DRUM AND MALABAR, HIGH, FINE SANDS, NON -HYDRIC 21 BOCA FINE SAND, NON - HYDRIC 22 CHOBEE, WINDER AND GATOR SOILS, DEPRESSIONAL, HYDRIC 25 BOCA, RIVIERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS, DEPRESSIONAL, HYDRIC 31 HILOLO LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, JUPITER AND MARGATE SOILS, HYDRIC r 38 URBAN LAND - MATLACHA - BOCA COMPLEX, NON- HYDRIC G}j7 ®49 HALLANDALE AND BOCA FINE SANDS. HYDRIC 199 SURFACE WATER --mot•. - C �-'� G1C1 \) Information From U S D A Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Au RATTLESNAKE,- _. _HAMMOCK RDA FA j J 0 10D Pfl r V i tr � t' 4,CJ l Hacienda Lakes Map E 0 1,000 2,000 Feet N DAITA INC. CONSULTING 1 %, T VA. JL • Planning • Visualization • Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rmjones Printing Date: May 17, 2010 File: T: \Pmjects\ 2005 \05_0150.02.03_HaciendaLakes\ ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda_E_Soils.mxd Source: Soils (SFWMD), Aerial (Collier County PA, Flown Date: Jan. 2010) E E L.., _ .....ail. M L,� - . ' L �I t t -( -� ,. 10 F. J� LEGEND: LANDS NOT INCLUDED IN PROJECT AREA NOTES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED DATE D THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY % OF APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF JANUARY 2009. Yuri PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER RWA, INC. DESCRIPTION DRAWING NO.2010 -01 -07 BNDY.DwG 180 DATED JANUARY 7, 2010. 79.89 Ac.t SURVEYED WETLAND LINES PER BANKS 212 ENGINEERING, INC. DRAWING NO.PoDs 9.14 Ac.t FOR APPROVAL 1 -II- 2010- PN- MOD.DwG DATED 260 JANUARY 11, 2010. 10.54Ac.t 0.5% ,f FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1' =200' 54.43 Ac.t AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS 3219E1 APPROXIMATED. 27.81 Ac.`- FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ( FLUCFCS) (FOOT 1999). LAWN BY D DATE D % OF FLUCFCS TOTAL CODE DESCRIPTION 180 RECREATIONAL 79.89 Ac.t 3.5% 212 UNIMPROVED PASTURE 9.14 Ac.t 0.4% 260 RURAL OPEN LAND 10.54Ac.t 0.5% 262 LOW PASTURE, HYDRIC 54.43 Ac.t 2.4% 3219E1 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 27.81 Ac.`- 12% 3219E2 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 12.60Ac.t 0.6% 3219E3 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 3.71 Ac.t 0.2% 3219114 PALMETTO PRAIRIE, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 5.75 Ac.t 0.3% 4119E1 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 90.01 Ac.t 4.0% 4119E2 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 143.78 Ac. t 6.4% 4119E3 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 23.49 Ac. t 1.0% 4119E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 0.35 Ac. t 0.0% 4159E2 PINE, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 6.77 Ac. t 0.3% 4159E3 PINE, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 10.78Ac.t 0.5% 4159E4 PINE, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 6.47 Ac.t 0.3% 4221 BRAZILIAN PEPPER, HYDRIC 1.81 Ac.t 0.1% 424 MELALEUCA 13.70 Ac. t 0.6% 4241 MELALEUCA, HYDRIC 345.07Ac.t 15.3% 4269E1 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 0.40 Ac.t 0.0% 4269E2 TROPICAL HARDWOOD HAMMOCK, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.25Ac.t 0.1% 4279E1 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (0 -24% EXOTICS) 3.89 Ac.t 0.2% 4279E2 LIVE OAK, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 0.29Ac.t 0.0% 4289E1 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 1.20Ac.t 0.1% 4289E2 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 19.08 Ac.t 0.8% 4289E3 CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (5075% EXOTICS) 3.25 Ac.t 0.1% 4349E1 HARDWOOD /CONIFER MIXED, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 1.47Ac.t 0.1% 514 DITCH 3.38 Ac. t 0.1% 6189E1 WILLOW, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 10.97 Ac. t 0.5% 6189E2 WILLOW, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.48 Ac. t 0.1% 6219E1 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (024% EXOTICS) 157.74 Ac.t 7.0% 6219E2 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 27.66 Ac.'- 12% 6219E3 CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50 -75% EXOTICS) 1.45 Ac.t 0.1% 62459E2 PINE / CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (25-49% EXOTICS) 1.32 Ac. t 0.1% 62459E3 PINE/ CYPRESS, DISTURBED AND DRAINED (50-75% EXOTICS) 2.36 Ac. t 0.1% 6249E1 PINE /CYPRESS, DISTURBED (0-24 %EXOTICS) 289.16 Ac. t 12.8% 6249E2 PINE/CYPRESS, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 327.32 Ac. t 14.5% 6249E3 PINE/CYPRESS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 258.23 AC. t 11.4% 6249E4 PINE / CYPRESS, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 27.66 Ac.± 12% 624BE2 PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (25-49% EXOTICS) 22.90 Ac.t 1.0% 624BE3 PINE /CYPRESS, BURNED (50-75 %EXOTICS) 9.56 Ac. t 0.4% 6259EI HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 31.52 Ac.t '1.4% 6259E2 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 27.86 Ac. `- 12% 6259E3 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (5075% EXOTICS) 63.26 Ac.`- 2.8% 6259E4 HYDRIC PINE, DISTURBED (76 -100% EXOTICS) 12.00 Ac.t 0.5% 625BE3 HYDRIC PINE, BURNED (5075% EXOTICS) 1.22 Ac.t 0.1% 6289111 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (0 -24% EXOTICS) 2.64 Ac.t 0.1% 6289E2 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 6.94 Ac.t 0.3% 6289E3 HYDRIC CABBAGE PALM, DISTURBED (5075% EXOTICS) 2.09 Ac.t 0.1% 6309E1 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (0-24% EXOTICS) 19.90 Ac. t 0.9% 6309E2 WETLAND FORESTED MIXED, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 7.21 Ac.t 0.3% 6319E3 WETLAND SHRUB, DISTURBED (5075% EXOTICS) 5.83 Ac.t 0.3% 6419EI FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (024% EXOTICS) 6.82 Ac.t 0.3% 6419E2 FRESHWATER MARSH, DISTURBED (25 -49% EXOTICS) 10.63 Ac.t 0.5% 740 DISTURBED LAND 3.21 Ac.t 0.1% 7401 DISTURBED LAND, HYDRIC 18.16 Ac.t 0.8% 742 BORROW AREA 5.38 Ac. --t 0.2% 743 SPOIL 0.16 Ac. t 0.0% 747 BERM 0.93 Ac.t 0.0% 814 ROAD 0.32 Ac. t 0.0% 8146 UNPAVED ROAD 4.33 Ac.t 0.2% 830 UTILITIES 1.08Ac.t 0.0% 8301 UTILITIES, HYDRIC 4.82 Ac. t 0.2% 832 POWERLINE EASEMENT 1.24Ac..t 0.1% 8321 POWERLINE EASEMENT, HYDRIC 4.27 Ac.t 0.2% TOTAL 2262.14 Ac.t 100.0% LAWN BY D DATE D ^'1 w •v O. O n W C, p �+ G N 0) c� C7 � �r rriy x � z � d 'T1 [Tf z x F -I FLUCFCS MAP. Dwc T.B. 17XI1 -C NORTH MAR 18. 2010 - 8:37AR IBwBC.':w�+'" IYiilr!itinYlY+tl BY: W-C x �1yY, rn - i m m *x' r ° m r N N r N r m- N N wN o _;, A a a 1 •� •1 •� .� P A o + + + + ++ + � � � � 1a ° RRRRRRRR°'RRRRAO'RRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRR� 'RRRIRRRRRRRR + u u+ 0 ? ~- �'aail -.'�H�y000ve000nnnnnnnn ~ � $g�i�'n 'n 'noon n'e��e act n n a a? c 91 S2 r a 9 9 9 a a s a n n n p 8 4 a P P a o 0 aann oaaw,�t�t oonnnnno C cc �1 � Y �I Y 4 O c 4 6 0 6 c A A A s A i C} a g A a A n n n n \\ \1 L1 l'L \� \Y lY l� L♦ L y} } S pn C� P A $A A 3° a A A 11 A 1� 91 • L\ L O a 0 0 D O 9 991 A A O O O a a a° A 9 4 O O ° C C O c c u l l l\ A A A A A 7- A p a a \ \� A A AR V° A A A A a A i L\1 A A _ 9 AA -00 Oaaaa - —c c cc c a p pp 92° ag g'� \ 4 i L as a °? R .4 + °a- a o � c c n n n n ^° o a a a a a w O�� 7 a a L\ L L y �ynnn^nnJ� 1ij -asap >• acee���� 1� pp+ �}O �� � �s • 7O } i O y � LO [y J iO �`y ` � n 1S nry C o � 0 C g6 21O ]] � i i UA [_. l A �{� A 'n pY AA JJ Rn 7A iiRA �5-1 A ppS^ oa i`�I oa 77Oa Y 5� O ogq aua74 4nn # q°enr °t4A Aq cc,"eoQ an o o re °° ° a L4 �Q [1 lY + + + a e e o- el w d e o -1 Id n a is A Q !j a H !9 G !� B o !j 1a w u u 1a e b a . e d e a Q �+ $ o- u Pi !t Y d e id bbb .* !I z, IV ahl9ii�W�'3@!miu.iifiligg tltigwuf3aeI H 5 v k4 wtl t1 441lt1?�at't�I'- 114���aL'$�ikip t AAAAAAAAAAA°xxAAAAAAAAAAA, AAA� �� AAAt`�;xxAAxAAxAAA �xAA °ik'AxAnAxAAAAAA� Z R R IF R R R R R R 1+ If R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R H go o e 00 o e o cc a a a 00 e o o o a a 15 a Y M°°° 1 e°°°° a e a° a° a e°° o a a ° +° a° 1a a s k. k 'i Y Ii tt 'a ti ti ti 'a g Y tt b i i 4 4 b y �t �� 11 k k. � 'i k kt % 1 y y It 14 y� y y 1 4 y 1 11 y 4 W 4 y'4 ti 4 ti ti 4. 1i 4 [i k1 li y iL � 4 4 4 P yfl C C Dn.lCi z-- �O O D z �.Zml N O yf G 1 � y O N m L D S 1T p b< n� A nr y m Zfsv D H b 0 �r= n Q r r O T w m A z o m zv D ca ��� D m z c <� °� ov jA �+�� `" o 1n° r3 c1° i ��v=i o 3 D o9 m vm D m Z ,1v OT ��f �mm o�D I n� m No oA pD o yn v 3 D z n Z D C ° Ao^' -z Aw y' CM cm, z o 3 m �z D V f < - o D DD m m L_ ,p ° .o �1 pm �z z m �� o ,DNC 2 0 3 D N O D O o O TI ��T1 is C OlG N � In, � 5 �> l ) /d m �r �y x x x C � n r� n O cn C x 5 v v LAKE 0 \DRI \F -I FLUCPCS MAP.MG TAR: 17XII -C SOUTH Man 18, 2010 - 8:33AM PWT ED Rr: WILLC N OO T a 11111 Bmamnia mam ri n N �vw,DbA V WN 00� W D OmMm m N mmNT mmmnwmTbwmT mmmmm.,T Maem,mnmW ,m.m. m ra u �7 -1iOm sQ �j OOmm'� �i v-o v-o DrC% m Qmc m m1TI m�� A����� Z Z Z Z mmmmm a a m m I IT � a a C) n n [7 o n n C) �{ ����� � n � �� b 0 C C D O Q O S D S rY � -i zz.P 0 ��iaDVOO C7 sss5s OQ o f15 �' r���z `� 0000�� -1 -I „„��DmZZZZ2 vo v_ -- pvvvov— �ccc cz mm� ��rrttm D9aD O�Ol pmp mmm mmmmm��DDy p7m4 C)NiN 2 m 0000--- -�v DD O 2Z CtltDD CQOQONyQQO000CCC Ca Ca ZCC*�� $- Ff)_[Qf1 .r°n�D =2 iRfR� ovYmv{m�'4 �iiki `�' - - - -- vvv��OO� �D mmmmav y9�o r�r�r- o- oa�ccaa��11���tiivv mmoo�' vovovoovB c Z z? O p p a a a a m m C C C C C C Q Q Q,-, ¢ a C C C Q Q Q Q-- - - - - -- Fri tti O p 0 0�1 N Ng Ifs Y' N 77 g dB e C C C C C n ccm voo TAvvvvoo A`b' d= ^) $ n mm�S2aEK��Raaaa ovwmv�" �j44'1 ;eae oQOOP mxx ,c7� °v_occc U�ga ovmr,xxp o Txm 9- 4- �vQQVVOOo C7 ji�4¢pii ii4}pi{ ��� x0 mmm � a QQpp00 �e04 , .J y T9 r¢.r CCQ 00 x xx 00 �_{- �1( -�I —= c � "�S`�QQ r 39 f3 x"o 4=Fmxxozz-BJ�� imm�'c gtr tDtll $e o x$;fo o- 9-C).=n x xxO - mm ax x 0{�0[(0/+mm p0/oO -_ �cil x xo xx x x O Y'N Am ' Y' ' 3^ mm Ooo nn YJ -+ - - O AAm m)( 9 A vv mo OO��q x O 4 MP A00 O()1 W W O Dun V,ON 0 V W ,'+'N� � V VNOW -' W� SOW NO[aA W-' mO QrO fV O (71 P N,.N,1A 0�D a�DR�y�( 3�38mSDdym" �Ei�$ 3^ 18858DF38y8yi8i�' li£ 8£ 3f3o�1 2k3�4y83' ffi° pfl iv4Y$ F3Qi�pi $D °��y°$oJ�iiDBJ °71y�8°D�8'�ya� h> n t� > ,n9 5bi n ,ti ,Fi n n n n n n ,rpi .ti ,r'i .ti n n ryi n rDi n n n p ti tDi tDi tbi ,rDi Fbi �i � tDi cDi n ki r i� ,ibi ,ki ;Di n {� tDi ,ta {� n n M i+ µ 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ I+ IF 1+ 1+ 1+ I+ I+ 1+ 1+ I+ N I+ I+ 1+ H W H 1+ H 1+ 1+ K H 1+1+ F+ H i+ 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+1+ 41+ H 1+ I+ 1+1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+1+ 1+ 1+ 1+ 1+1+ 1+ I+ 1+ I+ I+ 1+ R 1+ 55 d BN;a ,��i 4eee �$�'�a1e4'e�t o1��7e'��o ,eJ,e.X �KNj2���K�fi:C �eC 3Ee�3C,a�,E aE3AE wail 'o r r , O i r L ; mc >=23> C vvv D�� Lon DD D Mt O 00 m Z O u) tC nNC Z DZ.Z7 m ADO m Z �I C :D y D m m 3 ODai Z- co 0 m-4 g <�jmv Dune r�m ai ez)mm ZZ {- .Zm7r D D Z -ZZ GZ)Q 3 z m D P O {p °_-o x l r Z D C T A T n r � r N v N ° O G m� O DO �r ;1 O C <O ZO - zu T i C> ; u vNO .Z�] 0 mn `^ ZZ f 1 D r�c)D Ou) L. TI np 3 03 A �v o o < m > n0 D DD D O mDm z n rn v I = D- vm v _ Z ° v v °A D —m mm °m ;u0 V = T << v m < ; DC p U) Z O GFi 3 r D o N m A v O' z v Z n LEGEND: SFWMD WETLANDS ® SFWMD 'OTHER SURFACE WATERS' LANDS NOT INCLUDED IN PROJECT AREA SFWMD WETLAND AND 'OTHER SURFACE WATERS" NUMBER (TYP) �\ SURVEYED WETLAND LINE NOTES: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF JANUARY 2009. PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER RWA, INC. DRAWING NO.2010 -01 -07 BNDY.DwG DATFD .JANUARY 7, 2010. AND LINES PER RING, INC. IS FOR APPROVAL .DWG DATED { x IN s � e�� •''»Sr ., LL M y [IR %WN BY DATE a W.C. 2/4/10 13620 Metropolis Avenue ]*-VIEWED Rl DATE Suite 200 o C.G.R. 2/4/10 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 Phone (239) 274.0067 s REVISED DATE G ! 7 201 77 AC )Of PASSARELLA C:oneulcme - Ftt�c rc & SS0CIATES HACIENDA LAKES AERIAL WITH WETLANDS DRAWING N� ,- O l MTT7 37 SHEET No. MAP F -2 Hacienda Lakes Map H -1 0 0.2 0.4 Miles N DAVA INC. CONSUL'T'ING Z \Y YL jL • Planning • Visualization Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rjones Printing Date: July 14, 2010 File: T: \Projects \2005 \05_0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakes \ADA \Rev01 \ Hacienda H1 DevPlan A I I I I �I 0 I Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (see Map H -3 for details) of >I W J 0I C• m �I W J J of U FPL Easement I I Proposed Access R I � II li ii I R RorR1 Proposed Access pF Bp THE LORD'S WAY I A ROW p FPL p Proposed Access I Easement JD RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD `� S / I IMedical C F 1 llier Re tona1/4 Mi. Support r 9 Medical Border Center 1 r I 1 1 t TECO People's Gas Main Lines \ I I ROW SABAL PALM RD Access' Easement loll Henderson Creek Canal Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (see Map H-4 for details) Access R Legend ❑ Residential (R) RV Development Area (RV) "Project Boundary ■ Preserve Tract (P) ® Attraction Tract (A) ® Public ROW Reservation (ROW) u Junior Deputy (JD) . School (S) 7 Commercial (C) ® Residential / Medical Use (R /MU) Public Facilities Tract (EMS) . Business Park (BP) Roads -- TECO People's Gas Main Lines - Henderson Creek Canal -Collier County Major Roads Access' STATE IX Easement & LANDS D ' Access ' Easement Hacienda Lakes Map H -2 (Revised 9 -7 -11) 0 1,000 2,000 -� Feet 2A N DIATA INC. t'()NS Ill. "I ING Z \ T TL JL • Planning • Visualization -Civil Engineering -Surveying & Mapping Path: T \Projects\2005 \05_ 0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakes\ADA \RevO6 \Hacienda H2 DevPlan.mxd ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Access Stage One Easement Year Residential Single - Family Multi - Family Retail Office Business Park School 2012 50 Units 20 Units 30 Units 27,500 SF 0.0 SF 0.0 SF Land Use Summary 2013 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF 20,000 SF 0.0 SF Type Acreage 2014 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF* 25,000 SF 40,000 SF Commercial* 34.16 + /- 2015 250 Units ** 100 Units 150 Units 0.0 SF 25,000 SF 0.0 SF Lands Encumbered by ROW Tract * *2.51 2016 250 Units 100 Units 150 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 0.0 SF Attraction 47.27 + /- 950 Units 420 Units 530 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 40,000 SF Residential 447.86+/ - Business Park or School 35.38+/ - ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Preserve 1544.14+/ - Stage Two Public Facility 1.33+/ - Year Residential Single- Family Multi - Family Retail Office Business Park School Junior Deputy 21.62 + /- 2015 25 Units 0 Units 25 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 919 Students School 19.55 + /- 2016 25 Units 0 Units 25 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF Residential /Medical Use 38.82 + /- 2017 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF Public ROW & Easement 72.01 + /- 2018 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF Total 2262.14 + /- 2019 210 Units 84 Units 126 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 810 Units 284 Units 526 Units 0 0 100,000 SF 919 Students Totals: 1760 Units 704 Units 1,056 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 140,000 SF 919 Students *The 135 Room hotel is proposed to be developed in Stage One, in 2014. * *The optional 290 unit RV Park may be developed in Stage One, in 2015 I I 47 Hacienda Lakes Map H -2 (Revised 9 -7 -11) 0 1,000 2,000 -� Feet 2A N DIATA INC. t'()NS Ill. "I ING Z \ T TL JL • Planning • Visualization -Civil Engineering -Surveying & Mapping Path: T \Projects\2005 \05_ 0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakes\ADA \RevO6 \Hacienda H2 DevPlan.mxd C� Legend Residential (R) RV Development Area (RV) OProject Boundary - Attraction Tract (A) Junior Deputy (JD) Public ROW Reservation (ROW) - Business Park (BP) - School (S) Public Facilities Tract (EMS) ® Residential / Medical Use (R /MU) Commercial (C) - Preserve Tract (P) Roads -- TECO People's Gas Main Lines Henderson Creek Canal - Collier County Major Roads 0 W J :) 0 to to m � CU W J J O 0 Proposed Access Proposed Access FPL Easement IN 10 THE LORD'S WAY Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (see Map H -4 for details) BOUNDARY OF R TRACT ALLOWING i RV USES ROW P Henderson Creek , TECO People's Canal Gas Main Lines PROP. RATTLESNAKE P HAMMOCK RD. EXT. \ JD Proposed \ RATTLESNAKE Access HAMMOCKRD I N 1/4 Mi. Support Medical Border ■ C = aft ftw CI Land Use Summary Type Acreage FPL Easement Commercial' 34.16+/ - 'Lands Encumbered by ROW Tract Stage One Attraction 47.27 + /- Residential Collier Regional Residential 447.86+/ - Office Medical Center Business Park or School 35.38 + /- 20 Units 30 Units 27,500 SF Preserve 1544.14+/ - Public Facility 1.33 + 1- _ Junior Deputy 21.62+/-__ School 19.55+/ - Residential /Medical Use 38.82+/ - Public ROW & Easement 72.01+/ - Total 2262.14 + /- . ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage One Year Residential Single - Family Multi - Family Retail Office 2012 50 Units 20 Units 30 Units 27,500 SF 0.0 SF 2013 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF 20,000 SF 2014 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF' 25,000 SF 2015 250 Units ** 100 Units 150 Units 0.0 SF 25,000 SF 2016 250 Units 100 Units 150 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 950 Units 420 Units 530 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage Two Year Residential Single - Family Multi - Family Retail Office 2015 25 Units 0 Units 25 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 2016 25 Units 0 Units 25 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 2017 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 2018 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 2019 210 Units 84 Units 126 Units 0.0 SF i _ 0.0 SF 810 Units 284 Units 526 Units 0 _ 0 Totals: 1760 Units 704 Units 1,056 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF *The 135 Room hotel is proposed to be developed in Stage One, in 2014. **The optional 290 unit RV Park may be developed in Stage One, in 2015 Hacienda Lakes Map H -3 (Revised 9 -7 -11) R/M U it I I I Business Park School 0.0 SF 0.0 SF -- - - - - -- 40,000 SF 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 40,000 SF Business Park School 20,000 SF 919 Students 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 20,000 SF 100,000 SF 919 Students 140,000 SF 919 Students 0 400 800 Feet N MA INC ,'ONStJI_I I''n Z \T T1 1 •Planning - Visualization Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Path: T: \Projects\ 2005 \O5_ 0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakesWDA \Rev06\Hacienda_H3_DevPlan.mxd M f- Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (see Map H -3 for details) Access Easement RorRV W Access' Easement :i e , SABAL PALM RD Access' Easement Hacienda Lakes Map H -4 (Revised 9 -7 -11) Legend Layer OProject Boundary - Preserve Tract (P) RV Development Area (RV) - Public ROW Reservation Rural (ROW) Residential (R) Collier County Roads ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE - - Stage One - - _ - - Year Residential Single- Family Multi- Family ! Retatl OtAce _ BOSInesBPark School 2012 50 Units 20 Units 30 Units 27 500 SF 0.0 SF _ 0.0 SF __201 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150000 SF 20,000 SF 0.0 SF I _ 2014 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150 000 SF* 25,000 SF 40,000 SF 2015 250 Units " 100 Units 150 Units 0.0 SF_ 25,000 SF 0.0 SF 2016 250 Units 100 Units 150 Units 0 0 SF -0.6 SF 0.0 SF _ 950 Units 420 Units 530 Units 327 500 SF 70,000 SF _L 40,000 _ ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Stage Two Year Residential Single - Family Multi - Family - Retell Office Business Park School 2015 f 25 Units 0 Units 25 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF -' 919 Students 2016 25 Units 0 Units 25 Units 0.0 SF ____o-ou 20,000 SF - - 2017 275 Units rF--wdUnits 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 2018 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 2019 210 Units 84 Units 126 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 810 Units 284 Units 526 Units 0 0 L10Q000 SF 919 Students Totals: 1760 Units 704 Units 1,056 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 140,000 SF 919 Students *The 135 Room hotel is proposed to be developed in Stage One, in 2014. "The optional 290 unit RV Park may be developed in Stage One, in 2015 STATE LANDS `Access' Easement 0 800 1,600 Feet N Land Use Summary Acreage Type 34.16+/ - Commercial* "Lands Encumbered by ROW Tract - "2.51 Attraction _ 47.27+/ - Residential 447.86 + /- Business Park or School35.38 + /- - -- Preserve - 1544.14 + /- -- Public Facility - 1.33+/ - - Junior Deputy 21.62+/ - School 19.55+/ - Residential /Medical Use 38.82+_/ - Public ROW & Easement 72.01+/ - Total 2262.14 + 1- Access Easement DAITA M, C0NSULT'1NG Z \ T TL 1 • Planning • Visualization Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Path: T \Projects\ 2005 \05_ 0150. 02. 03_ HaciendaLakes\ADA \Rev06 \Hacienda_H4_DevPlan.mxd Hacienda Lakes Map 1 -1 - Existing Conditions 0 1,000 2,000 Feet N "DA / `INC. CONSUL'I'IN(; .AL %, T T 1 1 • Planning • Visualization Civil Engineering -Surveying & Mapping Prepared By. rmjones Printing Date: July 9, 2010 File: T:\ Projects\ 2005 \05_0150.02.03_HaciendaLakes\ ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda 1 -1 Exist.mxd Source: Aerial (Collier County PA, Date Flown: Jan. 2010) Hacienda Lakes Map 1 -2 - Proposed Conditions 0 1,000 2,000 Feet N DAITA INC. ('ONSUI VIN(i Z \T T1 1 • Planning -Visualization Civil Engineering Surveying & Mapping Prepared By:rmjones Printing Date: July 9, 2010 File: T: \Projects\ 2005 \05_0150.02.03_HaciendaLakes\ ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda_1- 2_Prop.mxd Source: Aerial (Collier County PA, Date Flown: Jan. 2010) AD o Hacienda Lakes Map 1 -3 0 1,000 2,000 Feet N _DA VAINC. CONSULTING ,Z \ 1 IF L JL • Planning • Visualization • Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rmjones Printing Date: May 18, 2010 File: T:\ Projects\ 2005 \05_0150.02.03_HaciendaLakes\ ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda 1 -3.mxd A y 2 z 10 ♦ , ' m 'm y n o Z n o A: m z z z Q -, •. c rn rn r 0 n o A 'o 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan Figure 10 -2 Collier County 2030 Highway Needs Plan COLLIER Metropolitan Planning Organlzawn MAP K Final Report 10-4 Adopted January 12, 2006 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan Figure 12 -1 2030 Constrained Financially Feasible Plan COLLIER MetropUitan Vlannkg Oryanlzatan MAP L Final Report 12-3 Adopted January 12, 2006 ` " J Hacienda Lakes Map M 0 0.5 1 Miles N "DA"XIA INC ( *()NSUL "TlN(; i�tr Ti 3L • Planning - Visualization Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Prepared By:rjones Printing Date: June 18, 2010 File: T: \Projects \2005 \05_0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakes\ADA \Rev01 \Hacienda_M_Benfield.mxd m Hacienda Lakes Map N 0 500 1,000 Feet N !r / \ / / ,INC. CONSULTING 1 \ T T.L JL • Planning • Visualization Civil Engineering • Surveying & Mapping Prepared By: rmjones Printing Dale: October 6, 2010 File: T: \Projects \2005 \05_0150.02.03_ HaciendaLakes \ADA \Rev02 \Hacienda_N_Ped MP. mxd 0 500 1,000 DIVA INC. Feet <'ONSUL "I'INC; 1 \ T TL 1 • Planning • Visualization -Civil Engineering -Surveying & Mapping Hacienda Lakes Map O N Path: T: \Projects\2005 \05_ 0150 .02.03_HaciendaLakes \ADA \Rev05 \Map O.mxd Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 10 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION K) Plannin� Visuali tiun L sulVAL S_,v gg 1 \ V tl J Survcyi�iF ® UESTION 10 —GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION Part 1 Specific Project Description A. Describe and discuss in general terms all major elements of the proposed development in its complete form. Include in this discussion the proposed phases (or stages) of development (not to exceed five years), magnitude in the appropriate units from Chapter 28 -24, F.A.C., where applicable, and expected beginning and completion dates for construction. Response: The Hacienda Lakes DRI is located east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) near the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, within Sections 11, 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida (See Map A). The Project contains property located in two Future Land Use Designations, including 625 acres (27% of the total Project area) in the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, and 1,637.07 acres (73% of the total Project area) in the Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District Sending Lands as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) from the Future Land Use Element as contained in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The total acreage of the DRI is approximately 2,262.14 acres (See Map H -1, H -2, H -3, and H -4). ® The Project provides for the following: • a maximum 1,760 residential dwelling units; • a maximum of 327,500 +/- square feet of retail (convenience, general and specialty retail), 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office space, a 135 room hotel, 140,000 square feet of business park, or school, and an elementary school to serve up to 919 students; • maintain the existing Swamp Buggy attraction land use on a parcel consisting of 61.7 +/- acres; and • maintain the existing Junior Deputies passive recreation facilities on a 23± acre site. �101 Due to the compact area of the proposed development, the Project will be developed in one overall phase, but based on this Question's direction to limit a stage of development to no more than 5- years; it has been broken into two stages. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SupporMearings\Q I O\Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.l NO DEVELOPMENT PHASING Stage One Year Residential Single - Family Multi- Family Retail Office Business Park School 2012 50 Units 20 Units 30 Units 27,500 SF 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 2013 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF 20,000 SF 0.0 SF 2014 200 Units 100 Units 100 Units 150,000 SF* 25,000 SF 40,000 SF 2015 250 Units 100 Units 150 Units 0.0 SF 25,000 SF 0.0 SF 2016 250 Units 100 Units 150 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 84 Units 950 Units 420 Units 530 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 40,000 SF Stage Two Year Residential Single - Family Multi- Family Retail Office Business Park School 2015 25 Units 0 Units 25 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 919 Students 2016 25 Units 0 Units 25 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 2017 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 2018 275 Units 100 Units 175 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 2019 210 Units 84 Units 126 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 20,000 SF 810 Units 284 Units 526 Units 0.0 SF 0.0 SF 100,000 SF 919 Students Totals: 1760 Units 704 Units 1056 Units 327,500 SF 70,000 SF 140,000 SF 919 Students Q* The 135 room hotel is proposed to be developed in Stage One, in 2014. The DRI includes approximately 1,544 acres of preserve, which includes both uplands and wetlands. A permanent conservation easement will be created by platting after the Developer has completed the required restoration and maintenance program required by the County's Land Development Code provisions related to Transfer of Development Rights program. The ultimate preserve conservation easements will be conveyed to a Federal, State, or local government agency by gift as required by the County's Land Development Code provisions related to Transfer of Development Rights program. The development area is limited to approximately 716 acres. The site includes a number of identified archeological sites, all of which fall within preserve areas. The project furthers the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District objectives by severing Transfer of Development Rights ( "TDRs ") from approximately 1,515 acres of lands designated Sending Lands on the FLUM. Those Sending Lands which generate the TDRs will be placed under a permanent conservation easement and ultimately deeded to a public entity, if accepted by them. In addition, the project provides for sufficient right -of -way to provide for access to the development areas within the Project boundaries B. Provide a breakdown of the existing and proposed land uses on the site for each phase of development through completion of the project. The developed land uses should be those identified in Section 380.0651, F.S. and Chapter 28 -24, F.A.C. Use Level III of The Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System: A Technical Report (September 1985), available from each regional planning council. Refer to Maps D (Existing Land Q: \1005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SupporMearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.2 L*1 Use and H (Master Plan). Use the format below and treat each land use category as mutually exclusive unless otherwise agreed to at the pre - application conference. Table 10.1.: Existing Land Use Description FLUCFCS Code Description Acreage Percent of Total 180 Recreational 79.89 3.5 212 Unimproved Pasture 9.14 0.4 260 Rural Open Land 10.54 1 0.5 262 Low Pasture, Hydric 54.43 2.4 3219 E1 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 27.81 1.2 3219 E2 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 12.60 0.6 3219 E3 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 3.71 0.2 3219 E4 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics ) 5.75 0.3 4119 E 1 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 90.01 4.0 4119 E2 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 143.78 6.4 4119 E3 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics ) 23.49 1.0 4119 E4 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics ) 0.35 <0.1 4159 E2 Pine, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 6.77 0.3 4159 E3 Pine, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics ) 10.78 0.5 4159 E4 Pine, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics ) 6.47 0.3 4221 Brazilian Pepper, H dric 1.81 0.1 424 Melaleuca 13.70 0.6 4241 Melaleuca, H dric 345.07 15.3 4269 E 1 Tropical Hardwood Hammock, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 0.40 <0.1 4269 E2 Tropical Hardwood Hammock, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 2.25 0.1 4279 E1 Live Oak, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 3.89 0.2 4279 E2 Live Oak, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 0.29 <0.1 4289 E1 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 1.20 0.1 4289 E2 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 19.08 0.8 4289 E3 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 3.25 0.1 4349 El Hardwood - Conifer, Mixed, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 1.47 0.1 514 Ditch 3.38 0.1 6189 E1 Willow, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 10.97 0.5 6189 E2 Willow, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 2.48 0.1 6219 El Cypress, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 157.74 7.0 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 27.66 1.2 6219 E3 Cypress, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 1.45 0.1 62459 E2 Pine /Cypress, Drained, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 1.32 0.1 62459 E3 Pine /Cypress, Drained, Disturbed 2.36 0.1 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.3 1*1 QA12005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QIO \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 PgA (50 - 75% Exotics) 6249 E1 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 289.16 12.8 6249 E2 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed (25- 49% Exotics) 327.32 14.5 6249 E3 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 258.23 11.4 6249 E4 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) 27.86 1.2 624B E2 Pine /Cypress, Burned (25 -49% Exotics) 22.90 1.0 624B E3 Pine /Cypress, Burned (50 -75% Exotics) 9.56 0.4 6259 El Hydric Pine, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 31.52 1.4 6259 E2 Hydric Pine, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 27.86 1.2 6259 E3 Hydric Pine, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 63.26 2.8 6259 E4 Hydric Pine, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) 12.00 0.5 625B E3 Hydric Pine, Burned (50 - 75% Exotics) 1.22 0.1 6289 E1 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 2.64 0.1 6289 E2 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 6.94 0.3 6289 E3 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 2.09 0.1 6309 E1 Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 19.90 0.9 6309 E2 Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 7.21 0.3 6319 E3 Wetland Shrub, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 5.83 0.3 6419 E 1 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics ) 6.82 0.3 6419 E2 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 10.63 0.5 740 Disturbed Land 3.21 0.1 7401 Disturbed Land, Hydric 18.16 0.8 742 Borrow Area 5.38 0.2 743 Spoil 0.16 <0.1 747 Berm 0.93 <0.1 814 Road 0.32 <0.1 8146 Unpaved Road 4.33 0.2 830 Utilities 1.08 <0.1 8301 Utilities, Hydric 4.82 0.2 832 Powerline Easement 1.24 0.1 8321 Powerline Easement, Hydric 4.27 0.2 Totals 2,262.14 100.0 QA12005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QIO \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 PgA Table 10.2.: Proposed Land Uses FLUCCS Code Land Use Approximate Acres Percent of Total 110, 120 Residential, Low Density, Residential, Medium Density 477.2 21.0 141, 143 Retail Sales and Service, and Professional Services 43.9 1.9 175 Governmental 1 nil 180, 183 Recreation, and Race Tracks 69 3.0 600,400 Wetland and Upland Preserve 1544.1 68.2 170 Institutional 19.5 nil 155 Light Industrial or Institutional 35.3 1.6 814 Roads and Highways 70.0 2.1 Total 2,262.1 100 C. Briefly describe previous and existing activities on site. Identify any constraints or special planning considerations that these previous activities have with respect to the proposed development. The Florida Sports Park is the home of the famous Swamp Buggy races held annually in January, March and October. The races have been held for the past 54 years, and in the current location for more than 20 years. The beginning of Swamp Buggy racing was usually as a gathering of hunters. The first races started taking place around 1943 and by the late 1940's, 30 to 40 racers would gather the week before hunting season to race for valued prizes such as shotguns. On November 12, 1949, the first official Swamp Buggy Races were organized by a group of civic and community leaders. In the mid- 1950's Swamp Buggy racing started to grow. As the popularity of the sport continued to grow, cash prizes and engraved trophies began to replace the old prizes. Buggies were now being constructed for racing only and were too fast and loud to be used for hunting. It was during this era that several important traditions such as the legendary "Swamp Buggy Queen's Annual Mudbath" and "Dunking" were conceived. The Dunking tradition began in 1957 when the Swamp Buggy Queen was dunked for the first time by a winner in the deepest part of the famous "Mile `O Mud" oval racetrack. Currently, the Florida Sports Park is providing entertainment and active recreational activities to citizens of, and visitors to, Collier County, and producing fund- raising opportunities to area charities and civic organizations. The plan of development will retain the existing Florida Sports Park land uses in their current location, thereby preserving the tradition of Swamp Buggy racing and protecting a unique aspect of the heritage and culture of Collier County. The existing swamp buggy racetrack is rarely used, and will be limited to approximately six major events per year. While the non -race social gathering facilities may be used more frequently, there would be QA2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.5 substantially less traffic associated with those minor events compared to the more intensive swamp buggy race events. The land uses permitted on the Attraction Tract are not being expanded, and are consistent with the land uses currently approved under the Swamp Buggy Days PUD. In addition to the Florida Sports Park active recreation land use, the Collier County Jr. Deputies League operates a passive recreation land use where young adults are afforded the opportunity to have an outdoor experience, including camping under a covered pavilion. These young people are educated through practical application of outdoor skills and teamwork to instill a positive social character and respect for the environment. These passive recreation land use opportunities will be retained within the Project, in their current location, to ensure the continuation of this important program. D. If the development is proposed to contain a shopping center, describe the primary and secondary trade areas which the proposed shopping center will serve. Please see the response to Question I OE. E. Describe in general terms how the demand for this project was determined. We have prepared an amplified response which simultaneously addresses IOD and 10 E. ® which generally reflects information and analysis provided to the Board of County commissioners as part of the petition for MPUD: The project as it has been proposed envisions a variety of uses and activities. The primary focus of Hacienda Lakes is its mix of multi and single family housing, comprised of an estimated 1760 units implemented in several stages. While the non - residential components add richly to the project, these become viable in large part because of the specific population being created on site. Certainly, the project's residents may shop or work elsewhere, just as the project's non- residential components will be available to persons living elsewhere in the County and region. Nonetheless, the onsite residents are an important source of initial and ongoing support for any of the physical uses that will occur as part of the larger development program. The decision to include non- residential uses in the project stems from a combination of regulatory, market, financial, and practical considerations that together speak to their need. In the current environment, it is advantageous to integrate multiple uses to create a more satisfying built environment and enhance community sustainability by reducing transportation demands, balancing work with housing, and managing overall physical growth. As these social objectives are achieved, the project is itself more desirable to prospective residents such that its market potential and financial performance are enhanced. In effect, the ultimate mix of uses draws upon a variety of considerations which together sustain a market position and encourage demand. Need then includes influences or factors broader than determinations about incremental space or lands required, or otherwise available, in the local market area. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.6 Specific to demand as one dimension o need, it is not practical to model all possible outcomes .f P at this stage of planning. As a result, it makes sense to think of demand in terms of a range. This range sets parameters within which actual performance might rationally be expected by the developer or others with interests in the proposed program. Consequently, we have evaluated demand for the commercial, office, business park, and lodging aspects of this project from a number of different perspectives including project based demand, share of market, and historical performance, all within the context of locations or properties that could compete over the proposed planning and development period. Though not identified as such, the different perspectives might be viewed collectively as a sensitivity test that gauges the reasonableness of the overall analysis. Hacienda Lakes, as it is now planned, envisions a variety of uses and activities but the primary focus remains its mix of multi and single family housing, comprised of an estimated 1,760 units implemented in several phases. These units area mix of multi and single family product directed at the county's growing and affluent population base. RESIDENTIAL DEMAND The residential framework and development program at Hacienda Lakes is fundamental to providing support for the project's non - residential elements. Given the current downturn in the housing market, it is appropriate to consider the dynamics of the longer housing market. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), it is generally agreed that the current recession began in December 2007. No formal close to the recession has been announced by NBER, the body generally recognized as the benchmarking authority for the nation's business cycles, but Spring 2010 is emerging as a likely endpoint according to many economists. Whatever the official end date, the decline in economic health well exceeds the 16 month contractions suffered first from 1973 to 1975 and then again from 1981 to 1982. These earlier downturns constitute the longest recessionary periods since the Great Depression. Although recent data remains mixed, it does on the whole suggest the steep economic decline already suffered is modulating leading to some consensus about a passing, if not ending, event. • Nationally, nonfarm employment edged upwards since December 2009. Preliminary data shows an increase of 290,000 employees from March 2010 to April 2010. The nation's unemployment rate dipped to 9.5 (P) in April 2010. • Even with some continuing loss of jobs, consumer confidence, an important predictor of spending potential, maintains an upward movement. The Conference Board (CB) reported that its index which had improved to 53.3 in May, up from 57.7 in April. The index had sagged somewhat after the first of the year but the most recent measure concludes three straight months of gains. The steady improvement is evidence of a more strident role for the consumer in rebuilding the nation's economy. • The CB's Index of leading economic indicators (LEI) for the U.S declined 0.1 percent in April, following a 1.3% gain in March, and a 0.4% rise in February. As of March there had been about one year of steady increases in this measure prompting CB economist Ken Goldstein to observe, "These results suggest a recovery that will continue through the summer, although it could lose a little steam." Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 32 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Q1O \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.7 At the same time, CB's coincident index (CEI), a measure of current economic activity, has been improving steadily since middle of 2009. • The results from the CB largely mirror information from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). BEA, in its May 27, 2010 release, reported thatgross domestic product GDPReal (GDP) increased 3.0 % in the first quarter of 2010 after increasing 5.6% int he fourth quarter of 2009. The increase tracks higher consumer spending, improved exports, and investments made for private inventory and residential activity. • Privately owned housing completions in May 2010 were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 687,000. This is 7.4% below the revised April 2010 estimate of 742,000 units but is 15.4% below the revised May 2009 rate of 812,000 units. May 2010 building permits, which offer some perspective of near term future activity, fell about 5.9% below the revised April 2010 figures but were 4.4% above the numbers for May 2009. Without suggesting that any part of Florida will rebound from the rescission immediately, population growth will resume at rates necessitating additional housing from several quarters. The more recent trends offer the expectation that a recovery is looming and that planning to take advantage of coming changes is not inappropriate. Without regard to County policy, growth in population has generally exceeded the BEBR moderate series. From a demand and economic perspective, it is worthy to consider how recent favorable shifts in various economic indicators might assure this growth is realized over the likely planning horizon. In any case, Collier County's population will have reached 518,100 persons by 2035 according to BEBR's most recent moderate series of projections. This is an increase over the 2010 population of approximately 184,000 people or a minimum increase of about 74,000 resident households. The current recession notwithstanding, this growth suggests a significant source of demand from incremental expansion of the area's permanent households. To clear its inventory of some 1760 units, Hacienda Lakes need capture only about 13.2% of the expected change through 2019, something of a high penetration rate but not untenable given the slowdown in planning now being experienced Applying BEBR's moderate projections through 2035, the project would have to capture only about 2.3% of the total resident change. Should the resident population exceed the moderate range, this percentage would decrease accordingly. It is worth noting that the moderate projection has actually been adjusted upward by about 10,000 people over that reported only one year before by BEBR, evidence of the conservative nature of this analysis. Estimated Population Growth Naples These numbers are only indicative of the many diverse layers of housing demand that will be realized from within the base of the existing population and experienced in the guise of relocations for preference, convenience, school choice, or realignment of family needs. The existing population also gives rise to housing demands that occur exclusively from new household formations generated as the result of divorces, new marriages, and returning children. 71111.1110 ■ Permanent 600,000 1 ■Seasonal Peak 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 2004 2009 2014 @Tom Doyle Data Source: Cdkea Courty Gorernmert Q: \1005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPL1D- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).dom 5/10/2011 Pg.8 The projected change in permanent or fulltime resident population, however, is only the most obvious source of potential demand. Demand also stems from sources that are not immediately evident in terms of their affects on the measurable population. Specifically, the area's effective population, as many indicators substantiate, is materially higher than the reported permanent population and will drive demand higher. As the permanent segments have grown, these too are reasonably posited to show increases. The impacts of these non - resident population counts are obvious in the accompanying graph prepared by Collier County staff. Mobility and its impacts are further illustrated in data distributed by Sun Realty of Naples. Reporting that fewer than 50% of local homes are bought by area residents, the organization also reports fewer than 10% actually reside in Florida, meaning a substantial number of homes in the Naples area are occupied as second homes. Without validating the data as altogether correct, the inference, in the context of other factors, clearly is that the scale of the market cannot be adequately judged by an analysis of ® current and projected resident population alone. Where Naples Residents Live Region • Florida • Mid Atlantic • Midwest • New England • Foreign • Other States Among the key drivers of the second or seasonal phenomenon is the state's tax structure. Without an income tax, Florida is especially attractive to high income households, and Naples has historically been a draw for this socio- economic group. Additional observations regarding the effective population come from these sources: • The American Community Survey (2006 -2008) indicates that there were an estimated 53,350 units of a total 192,000 housing units in Collier County held exclusively for seasonal and second home usage. These seasonal units represent about 28% of the total inventory. • As of 2009, there were a reported 75 hotel and motel establishments in Collier County with a combined roost count of 6814 rooms. According to the local Convention and Visitors Bureau, occupancies swell in the winter and spring months to 70% or more. • As evidenced by a perusal of the region's tax rolls, a substantial share of the local housing market is occupied by non - residents, many from overseas as well as elsewhere in the United States that domicile in Collier County on a seasonal and second home basis. Of 181,292 residential parcels identified on the 2009 tax rolls, 57,547 were identified as out -of -state or foreign owners. Whatever factor(s) one applies to the above particular indicators, they are suggestive of higher population counts and represent a demonstrable interest in this regional location. These prospective residents could represent some 25 % -35% of the project's households but are not necessary to maintain an otherwise reasonable market share. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.9 Still, another way of benchmarking data is to consider building permits as a function of the reported resident population change over some longer period of time so that the pace of construction activity is moderated. The area market was experiencing significant pressure from non- resident purchasers well before the onset of the current recession so permits may be deemed a more reliable indicator of housing trends on average than changes measured in population. From 2000 -2010, the population changed by about 82,000 people. Over this same time frame, about 52,000 permits were issued locally. For each person, approximately 0. 62 permits were recorded yielding today's inventory. Rather than suggesting merely an overbuilt situation, if that is the case, the relationships illustrate the general degree to which housing construction has responded to external influence. Using a more conservative and lower 0.55 relationship, at least some 18,000 housing units would still need to be constructed by 2015 with an additional 83,000 constructed by 2035. Viewed in terms of market share against these numbers, Hacienda Lakes would need to capture less than 10% of* the housing required by 2015. On balance, the fundamental demographics support the project's unit count. Its position will have to be validated by cost and pricing analysis that should not be confused with basic issues involving growth and general housing demand. NON - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, OVERVIEW As the accompanying table Commercial inventory In service, Collier County indicates, there has been a Selected years steady progression of non- residential development in 1995 -1998 1995 -2008 1999 -2008 1995 -2008 1999 -2008 P Average Average the Collier County, which generally matches the Commercial 1,743,030 10,986,605 9,243,575 784,758 924,358 g y Office/ Banks 627,673 2,667,745 2,040,072 190,553 204,007 increase observed in Industrial 1,241,887 4,112,661 2,870,774 293,762 287,077 residential activity. At least since 1995, about 1,700,000 Total 3,612,590 17,767,011 14,154,421 1,776,701 1,415,442 square feet (SF) of various kinds of facilities have been placed into service annually ending upon need and location. The benchmark dates shown purposely ignore later additions because they may not be occupied and because they may have not properly matched the pace of actually demand. As of December 2008, about 14,000,000 SF total were added with about 64% accounted for as commercial space. Such numbers have greater meaning in the context of other jurisdictions where there have presumably been different rates of development and emphasis on the appropriate uses and forms. Viewed in the aggregate, however, these numbers from areas with varied levels of economic maturity offer some broader benchmarks by which activity might be measured relative to residential development or population growth. On an overall basis, it can be rationally assumed that these markets achieve relative balance in their land use demands over an extended time, especially if aberrational periods are removed as reference points. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 32 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.10 For purposes of multi jurisdictional comparison, our analysis correlates to the total number of dwelling units, not population, The former offers the certainty that the effective population and its related needs, spending or demand are captured in the analytical framework whether or not that population is officially recognized as the resident population. The table below summarizes selected data by designated land codes from each respective county's tax roll(s). It is a composite of all development existing within the built environment as of 2000. This period would overlook the levels of activity occurring since 2005 and now shown to be unsustainable. Looking at the totals only, it would not be unreasonable to expect each dwelling unit to support a minimum of 91 SF, potentially as much as an average of 279 SF although there many instances in more mature settings where the numbers reach beyond 300 SF. Non - residential inventory in service, selected counties, 2000 Total retail and commercial inventory in service (SF) per dwelling unit (DU) as of December, 2000. Includes DOR (land use) codes 11 -14, 16,29,30 Total office inventory in service (SF) per dwelling unit (DU)as of December, 2000. Includes DOR (land use) codes 17- 29,23 -25 Total industrial inventory in service (SF) per dwelling unit (DU)as of December, 2000. Includes DOR (land use) codes 85,86,87 Total all P91 Such data establishes a reference point for the planned program at Hacienda Lakes, explained in more detail over the next several pages. Qt 21005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRL -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Heaiings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.11 Alachua 136.96 76.11 123.01 336.09 Charlotte Clay 91.80 211.22 18.49 40.68 49.87 109.44 160.16 361.35 Collier 107.23 28.58 69.35 205.16 Dade 131.65 96.32 235.54 463.51 DeSoto 83.01 32.85 63.81 179.67 Gadsen 86.83 54.80 267.03 408.65 Glades 43.97 7.09 40.30 91.35 Hardee 78.08 35.40 52.33 165.81 Highlands 82.22 30.30 62.18 174.69 Lake 106.80 42.49 120.42 269.70 Liberty 65.49 21.54 26.00 113.03 Okaloosa 149.62 73.53 117.39 340.54 Okeechobee 136.32 33.67 18.86 188.85 Orange 167.65 142.01 240.68 550.33 Polk 112.71 47.92 217.94 378.56 Seminole 151.98 91.22 170.08 413.28 St. Lucie 99.67 31.54 97.87 229.08 Average 113.51 50.25 115.67 279.43 Low 43.97 7.09 18.86 91.35 High 211.22 142.01 267.03 550.33 P91 Such data establishes a reference point for the planned program at Hacienda Lakes, explained in more detail over the next several pages. Qt 21005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRL -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Heaiings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.11 19 Future Retail and Commercial Demands Each year the Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes its Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE). The survey that began in 1980 consists of an interview in which consumer units (households typically) are queried every 3 months over a 12 -month period to track income, tax and expenditure habits, distinguishing these by size of household, employment status, income and other attributes. The survey effort is designed to capture different types of consumer expenditures occurring over a period of time. A part of that survey is reproduced here in summary form with the relevant categories of spending or other information highlighted. Materials not highlighted or referenced provide context but are not apart of any calculations as discussed. Average annual expenditures, Consumer Expenditure Survey, 2008 Apparel and services $3,643 $2,734 $3,122 $4,886 $100,000 $100,000 to $120,000 to $150,000 and Item and more $119,999 $149,000 more Income after taxes $157,379 $105,048 $127,295 $220,261 Average annual expenditures $100,065 $77,586 $91,590 $124,678 Food at home $5,690 $5,390 $5,755 $5,940 Food away from home $5,611 $4,383 $5,214 $7,071 Alcoholic beverages $919 $761 $904 $1,083 Housekeeping supplies $1,165 $1,147 $1,097 $1,238 Laundry and cleaning supplies $212 $199 $236 $208 Other household products $702 $735 $600 $747 Postage and stationery $251 $213 $260 $282 Household furnishings and equipment $3,531 $2,642 $3,091 $4,631 Household textiles $303 $206 $239 $443 Furniture $863 $573 $727 $1,191 Floor coverings $104 $93 $82 $128 Major appliances $394 $274 $362 $515 Small appliances $232 $156 $208 $325 Miscellaneous household equipment $1,634 $1,341 $1,474 $2,029 Apparel and services $3,643 $2,734 $3,122 $4,886 determinant Given the nature of the residential program and the apparent demand segments, the larger project is likely to be oriented toward the regions' highest income families. In 2008, the CE indicates that households with incomes in excess of 5150,000 per year allocated on average about 541,000 of a total 5124,000 available for food at home, outside dining, entertainment, personal needs, and miscellaneous household expenditures. These sums do not include those Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP`,0003 DRI - ADA',Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support Rearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.12 Transportation $15,674 $13,424 $15,720 In effect, the CE offers a glimpse 0 Vehicle purchases (net outlay) $5,450 $4,546 $5,764 $5,984 what families allocate to certain Gasoline and motor oil $4,206 $3,954 $4,237 $4,396 activities and provides a framework for Healthcare $4,471 $4,037 $4,316 $4,931 projecting what those expenses are and Drugs $651 $615 $644 $686 how they may ultimately manifest Medical supplies $198 $171 $167 $244 themselves in terms of supportable Entertainment $5,669 $4,306 $6,363 $6,835 demand for physical facilities. The unit Personal care products and services $1.196 $947 $1,138 $1,472 of analysis is the household. While there remain some questions at this Reading $233 $197 $210 $278 point what specific users, restaurants, Tobacco products and smoking supplies $258 $322 $244 $217 or other operators may ultimately be drawn to the Hacienda Lakes location, Miscellaneous $1,767 $1,276 $1,612 $2,277 the spending habits of the project's Household expenditures, except cars $41,404 affluent households are reasonably Household expenditures, including cars $47,238 determinant Given the nature of the residential program and the apparent demand segments, the larger project is likely to be oriented toward the regions' highest income families. In 2008, the CE indicates that households with incomes in excess of 5150,000 per year allocated on average about 541,000 of a total 5124,000 available for food at home, outside dining, entertainment, personal needs, and miscellaneous household expenditures. These sums do not include those Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP`,0003 DRI - ADA',Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support Rearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.12 directed to housing, transportation, automotive purchases and services, education, insurance, and many other items not of immediate relevance to this analysis and not shown in the table at all. Nonetheless, these too might also be purchased or consumed nearby within facilities or buildings just for that purpose. Medical services would be an example of the latter category of goods or services not counted. Because of these or similar exclusions, the list of identified consumables, in this context, would be deemed conservative. Based on the expected population of Hacienda Lakes and its consumption patterns, its group of households would reasonably be expected to allocate some $72,000,000 in total annual spending for a variety of goods and services that could be located on site and within the project's scope. If automobile purchases are assumed to be a part of the mix, the total rises to an expected $83,000,000. Again, the specifics will be a function of the users matched to the site's locational and market features as building plans are implemented. In theoretical terms, data collected by the US Bureau of the Census directly from retailers and service providers, would reconcile to the reported spending of individual or household consumers. Although the data and categorization of the information fail to match perfectly to the CE, they provide yet another means of gauging aggregate expenditure potential. In 2009, the per capita spending for a more discrete set of items - general retail and food only - was approximately $11,000, down materially from $12,000 estimated in 2008. At an assumed household size of 2.5 persons, the total expenditures would be would almost $50,000,000. This estimate is not income adjusted, does not include some categories identified specifically in the CE survey, and excludes all auto related expenses, including even gas or oil purchases. According to Sales & Marketing Management 2002 Survey of Buying Power, Naples significantly exceeds both the national and state average for retail sales per household, with $39,583. Florida's average retail sales per household is $32,024, while the U.S. average is $33,662. Given these much higher numbers, the per capita estimates seem very conservative. Certainly used as a proxy for supportable spending, the estimated $50,000,000 in consumables would be substantially more conservative than the sums suggested by the CE survey but sufficiently close to validate the estimate. How individual operators or users respond to these spending patterns is subject to extreme variation depending on size, type, and market position. The Urban Land Institute's (ULI) Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers is the definitive source of retail metrics. The data is useful as a benchmark but it is focused almost exclusively on shopping centers, and much of what functions as retail may not be in a conventional retailing environment or be of a size below ULI's reporting thresholds. Given that caveat, it can be assumed in general that sales occurring in appropriate venues would average from a low of approximately $150 per square foot (SF) to a high of about $485 per SF with many around $200 per SF. Given a potential $72,000,000 in sales from the project's households, these figures, in conjunction with sales per SF, suggest that a low of 150,000 SF up to a high of 363,000 SF might be supported based upon choice of tenants and sales volume experienced. At an assumed sales projection of $50,000,000, a supportable program could support an estimated 315,000 per SF. If the high is optimistic, the lower end of the range matches well to the County's estimated commercial and retail square footage per dwelling unit (107 SF) as these relationships existed Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.13 in the year 2000. We benchmark to this single year to moderate the rapid spike in all kinds of development which occurred mid decade. Further, the number is well within a reasonable market share of the actual absorption occurring in the ten yrs from 1998 -2008 and the annual average achieved during this period. These benchmarks notwithstanding, the most probable number reflects average sales of some $200 per SF generating a supportable program between the low and the high at about 340,000 SF based on assumed annual sales. Including frictional vacancies of 5%, the number rises to about 357,000 SF, well above the size of the retail facilities contemplated in the current application. The supportable square footage would be materially higher if auto sales or other activities should ultimately figure into the mix of operators, and there is no reason to remove such prospective users until development plans advance. Actual absorption of space would be yet another indicator of demand potential although the data is more generalized and covers an aggressive period of retail inventory expansion. Without regard to location, about 2,700,000 SF of retail space were absorbed countywide from the end of 2005 through the end of 2009, according to data prepared by Costar, an annualized rate of about 553,000 SF. This is well below the figure suggested by data summarized from the County's tax rolls, and reported earlier, at some 900,000 SF over a ten year period. Either reference point, in the context of the physically identifiable market, suggests the project's proposed commercial program is relatively modest. pOverall, we think the retail and commercial components are justified in the proposed project based on the scale of other elements in the plan. Even recognizing, current vacancies in the market which are above 10 %, the planned development program is not unreasonable in the time frame presented. Future Office Demands While the commercial opportunities on site are beneficially and symbiotically associated with the concentration of nearby housing, the demand for office space is less direct. Nonetheless, for planning purposes, it is still useful to think of additional office space inventory in terms of incremental change in either area population or household growth because of their association with employment changes. Not unlike the commercial uses planned as part of Hacienda Lakes, need for office uses in the context of the larger development program includes influences or factors that are broader than considerations of incremental space required or already available in the local market area. As the data reported previously illustrates, there are no specific measures that would suggest a single benchmark for office space. Unlike retail which is commensurate with certain spending patterns, levels of residential activity, and settlement patterns, the ultimate demand for office space depends on the area's capacity to function as a major employment center. Absent a level of mature economic activity, it may be unreasonable to anticipate demand for office space beyond that associated with basic insurance, financial, medical, or miscellaneous personal services. Rather than reaching levels of 90 SF - 140 SF per dwelling unit, like Orange, Dade, Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRi ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.14 or Seminole counties, the more measure m appropriate i g ht be a lower 50 SF - 60 SF per dwelling unit. Again, these numbers reflect the housing counts and their relationship to inventories in place during 2000. Because these numbers were realized before the surge in construction activity leading into the current recession, they are unlikely to misrepresent the relationship between housing and other kinds of development. At these benchmark figures, some 88,000 SF to 105,000 SF of office space might be supported, numbers above those shown in the proposed development program. Again, even recognizing, current vacancies in the market which may be near 15%, the planned development program is not unreasonable in the time frame presented. Collier County's actual number in 2000 was 28.50 SF of office space per dwelling unit. If correct, the number would suggest a low of about 50,000 SF of office space might be supported. In the context of the reference numbers for other counties, 28.50 SF seems low if the County's wish is to promote continued economic development and diversification of employment opportunities. At the very least, this means of estimating demand signals a floor for the proposed program. Actual absorption of space would be yet another indicator of demand potential although the data is plausibly discounted since, like the retail data reported, it also covers an aggressive period of development and construction. Without regard to location, about 1,300,000 SF of office space were absorbed countywide from the end of 2005 through the end of 2009, an annualized rate of about 325,000 SF. The project's proposed office inventory represents a very small part of the physically identifiable office market. Again, a full occupancy is unlikely to be achieved. Consequently, the inventory built to accommodate this potential demand would be moderately higher to allow for frictional vacancies. As with the retail and commercial estimates, the most probable number falls between the low and the high at about 75,000 SF, approximately the figures proposed in the development program. Future Hotel Demands As with the other uses, it is useful to think of the lodging inventory relative to the scale of the population which is a proxy for the area's strength as a business and tourist destination. Since the region offers so many beaches and natural features, the relationship between population and the available inventory is likely to understate the strength of the market and its potential to support added rooms. Using the 2000 population of 251,400 persons to establish a benchmark, there was one room for every 35 -40 persons in Collier County based on data available from the Department of Business Regulation. As with the retail and office uses described above, these numbers illustrate conditions before the surge in construction activity leading into the current recession. These numbers change to one room for approximately 45 -50 persons using an estimated 2008 population of 332,856. Together, the higher and lower population counts suggest a supportable room count of approximately 120 rooms to 150 rooms at the Hacienda Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRt - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QIO \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docz 5/10/2011 Pg.15 ® Lakes site a range consistent with the 135 rooms contemplated in the proposed development plan. If the project's other features are themselves supported as the analysis suggests, they will in turn add to the base of support for the proposed hotel which is envisioned as a limited service property of the type typically sited proximate interstate interchanges and along major commercial roads. In 2009, the county's occupancy rate was reported by the CVB to be about 65% indicating some question about the viability of hotels in less supportive locations or settings. Here, a limited service lodging property is a use which complements the other proposed non - residential uses, and it functions as still another amenity for Hacienda Lakes. The lodging use is appropriate given the larger mixed use concept being proposed Future Business Park or Industrial Demands Business park uses are less discrete in terms of their orientation compared to the other categories of land use proposed for the development program. Normally, these business park uses are comprised of some combination of office, flex, warehouse, and/or manufacturing facilities. Flex space is comprised of finishes that balance office and warehouse or distribution functions. Office spaces most likely to be sited in a business park setting will be class B or C structures and would not readily compete with the class A facilities contemplated elsewhere in the larger project. Not unlike the market for office facilities, there are no specific measures that would suggest a single appropriate benchmark for industrial or business park needs. As with office space, the ultimate demand for space that might support industrial, semi- industrial or distribution activities is highly dependent upon the area's capacity to function as a major employment center. Absent a level of mature economic activity, it may be unreasonable to anticipate demand for business park uses that normally flow to a regional commercial hub. Here, the needs are likely to be more locally oriented although that could change over the project's implementation timetable. Given the region's higher incomes, the market price for land suited to housing and other forms of non - residential activity tends to preclude these kinds of uses which are necessary whatever the state of the economy. Consequently, it can be reasoned that business park or similar uses are now under represented in Collier County. Rather than reaching levels of 120 SF - 240 SF per dwelling unit, like Lake, Orange, or Polk counties, the more appropriate measure might be a lower 70 SF - 90 SF per dwelling unit, numbers that begin to push beyond the present level but which do not rise to the capability of a regional distribution center. These numbers suggest a range of 123,000 SF to 158,000 SF oriented to business park functions and structures, effectively figures in keeping with the current program. These numbers reflect conventional warehousing and semi - industrial characteristics but inevitably some space will shift to activities more compatible with office needs. Given that the overall program could be deemed light in terms of its conventional office elements, some of the longer term demands might be satisfied within the confines of a business park environment. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SupportUicarings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).doex 5/10/2011 Pg.16 How these business park uses will ultimately adapt to market needs will depend largely on the way in which the region and location are marketed. Still, they seem to be a reasonable complement to the balance of the development program. CONCEPT OVERALL, SUMMARY There are many different considerations or factors to weigh in determining the overall and most desirable mix of uses to be entitled and developed. Because the project's primary focus is centered on residential uses, these must be the applicant's principal concern. In that regard, the evidence seems to indicate that the relative magnitude of population growth and interest in second or seasonal homes justifies the project's primary land use. While the current state of the economy seems to mitigate this potential, the longer term data and recent shifts in the economy point to recovery, suggesting the applicant's plans are reasonably considered now. Other components of the project have a base of market support, estimated by their relationship to the total number of units proposed, likely spending, and prior patterns of use and demand extending over several years. Again, the current state of the economy, though something of a concern, is not a long term bellwether of the estimates provided. Aside from the expectations of demand, there are broader community and planning values to consider which largely dictate that any major residential project also include complementing land uses to enhance the value both to residents and investors. In that regard, competing projects, though something of an issue, are not the single consideration for proceeding with the broader concept as proposed. As for competing properties, there are none that can accommodate the proposed plan's business park activities. Most of these plans remain speculative and uncertain. If the proposed project is to realize its market position, it cannot be handicapped or constrained by perceptions of projects that will not occur with some level of certainty. Part 2 Consistency with Comprehensive Plans A. Demonstrate how the proposed project is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and land development regulations. Indicate whether the proposed project will require an amendment to the adopted local comprehensive plan, including the capital improvements element. If so, please describe the necessary changes. Response: The development of Hacienda Lakes will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The development will be consistent with the GMP goals, objectives and policies, and with the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), and other applicable regulations for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within Activity Center # 7, the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict (URF), and Sending Lands of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District • (RFMUD) of the Agricultural/ Rural Mixed Use District as identified on the Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support Hearings \Ql0 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.17 ® Future Land Use Ma of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The purpose of Map ( ) PIP the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict is to provide for a variety of residential and mixed -use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. 2. The residential density of the proposed PUD will be in compliance with the Density Rating System of the Future Land Use Element, The MPUD will implement the Density Blending provisions of the FLUE. The URF is limited to 1.5 dwelling units per acre. The Project has approximately 589.69 acres within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, including lands within Mixed Use Activity Center #7, but exclusive of the lands proposed as business park. Therefore, 884.53 dwelling units are provided for. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides for 0.20 dwelling units per acre as a "base" Transfer of Development Right (TDR) credit for Sending lands. The Project has approximately 1637 acres of Sending Lands adjacent to the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, of which approximately 121.79 acres are proposed for development, or are within the proposed Benfield Road corridor. Those 121.79 acres proposed for development, or a part of the Benfield road corridor are not permitted to generate TDR's, but are permitted to have a density of one dwelling unit per forty acres, therefore, 3.02 units are provided for. A density bonus is also being utilized by providing excess mitigation activities as provided for in the FLUE and implemented in Section 3.05.07 of the LDC, where 10% of the eligible ® density may be granted for the creation, enhancement or restoration of habitat for listed species. The sum total of the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict base density, including those lands in Activity Center #7, and those lands intended for development in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District is 888 dwelling units (884.54 + 3.02 = 887.56, or 888 units). In order to determine the overall potential density of the MPUD, the base density derived herein would need to be added to the potential units that may be generated from the density bonus, TDR credits and TDR bonus credits severed from onsite, and potentially off -site Sending lands subject to the locational criteria of the FLUE. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District provides for 0.20 dwelling units per acre as a "base" Transfer of Development Right (TDR) credit for Sending lands. The Project has approximately 1636.84 acres of Sending lands within the Rural Fringe Mixed -Use District, of which approximately 121.79 acres are proposed for development. Those 121.79 acres proposed for development, or within the proposed Benfield Road corridor, are not permitted to generate TDR's. Therefore, the remaining 1515.05 acres generates 303.01 "base" TDR credits. The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District (RFMUD) provides for 0.20 dwelling units per acre as a "bonus" TDR credit for "early entry ", a 0.20 dwelling units per gross acre "bonus" TDR credit for "restoration and maintenance" of preserves, and a 0.20 dwelling units per gross acre "bonus" TDR credit for "conveyance" of preserves within Sending lands. A Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is being pursued that would provide for an increase in density by utilizing all of the TDRs that qualify for transfer into the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, up to 1.3 dwelling units per gross acre. The sum total of base TDR credits and TDR bonus Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.18 �01 credits that may be generated from on -site Sending lands, including all qualified TDR credits is 1212.04 units. Those RFMUD Sending Lands within 1 mile of the URF boundary that are not proposed for development equal 1022.04 acres, which generate 818.42 TDRs. Those RFMUD Sending Lands that do not qualify to be used in the URF equal 493.23 acres. Q:\2005\050150.02.01 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.19 I!I „ LEGEND: QUALIFIED SENDING „ AREA = 1022.04 ACRES I AREA NOT QUALIFIED FOR SENDING = 493.23 ACRES DEVELOPMENT IN RFMUD ACRES = 121.79 rn , -- URF PRESERVE 53.06 ACRES J J i 5280' RFMUD PRESER 1491.08 ACRES jj { w L-F II 1 III „ III l ' �.I n �I - SABAL PALM ROAD I R i i I . ':;. zou u. -so I � au o: \vr c..,c •snv, ��.:���. uo,:•. _,.,�;- rar- - \000, caaa,o::.�a�no,,w \ooa - s:ro,aa. t., c.�e.m c«,aw,mo. S .: ,: .. ,. "cPlamm�g MAY "1 CUF.NT- HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES, LLC. \' Visualization = 25CC CONSULTING Z %. T CivaEngineering TL JL Surveying & Mapping - HACIENDA LAKES 9610 W.Ilow Park Drire. Su¢e 2W T D R SENDING EXHIBIT Nadel, Flpda 34109 FAX (2'9"°775 FAX {239) 59L0579 050150.02.03 1 1 0501500203PX 55 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.20 ® 4. In summary, to 1851.41 units are provided for, which is the sum of the total rY, p p base density of Project lands within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, exclusive of lands potentially utilized for the business park, the base density of lands intended to be developed in the Sending lands of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, the ten percent density bonus for excess mitigation, and the all the TDR credits that could be generated from qualified, on -site Sending lands. Despite this 1851.41 unit total, the requested Project density is limited to 1,760 units. Therefore the overall Project gross density would not exceed 0.78 dwelling units per acre. 5. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD will implement Policy 3.1 of the FLUE through on- site well field protection measures, preservation of NRPA lands within the Project, preservation of archaeological sites within the Project, and the safe and convenient vehicular and pedestrian movement within the Project. 6. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. 7. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD will implement Policy 5.6 of the FLUE through the use of clustered development and utilization of the TDR program within the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District. 8. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with the LDC as set forth in Objective 3 of the FLUE. 9. The development of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policy 3.1 of the FLUE. 10. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD Master Plan implements Policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, and 7.4 of the FLUE by providing for vehicular and pedestrian interconnections with off -site public roadways and adjacent greenway. Additionally, public access and roadway easements will not be vacated to preclude access to off -site private and public lands. 11. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD will implement Policy 2.2.2. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element through the utilization of the Best Management Practices Matrix currently being promulgated by the SFWMD. 12. The native vegetation provisions of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD implement Policy 6.1.2 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element in that native preserves will be incorporated into the project design. A Growth Management Plan amendment is being pursued to allow a partial shift of native vegetation preservation requirements in the URF Subdistrict portion of the MPUD to the RFMUD portion of the MPUD on a ratio of 2:1. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRi - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Ilearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.21 13. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD will implement Policy 6.2.3. of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element, wherein the majority of the on -site lands within the NRPA will be protected through conservation easement, and will have the opportunity to utilize the TDR program set forth in the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District of the FLUE. 14. The Hacienda Lakes MPUD is planned to incorporate natural systems for water management in accordance with their natural functions and capabilities as may be required by Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. 15. By virtue of compliance with the provisions of Chapter 6, of the LDC, the project will also implement, and further Objective 2.0 of the FLUE, Objective 1.2 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub - Element, and Objective 1.5 of the Recreation and Open Space Element. B. Describe how the proposed development will meet goals and policies contained in the appropriate Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. Response: The Hacienda Lakes DRI is consistent with the Strategic Regional Policy Plan of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council, dated April 2002. The goals and policies of the ® plan address the following regional issues: affordable housing, economic development, emergency preparedness, natural resources, and regional transportation. Affordable Housing The Hacienda Lakes, LLC DRI will provide a wide range of single - family and multi - family units of varying sized and types, which will be responsive to a wide range of income categories. Economic Development The Hacienda Lakes DRI furthers Southwest Florida's economic goals of diversification. The Hacienda Lakes DRI will be a new local economic driver and will provide 397,500 square feet of retail and office space, as well as 140,000 square feet of business park development opportunity, generating significant numbers of new jobs in urban Collier County. Goal II -6, Policies 7, 8, 9 and 11 require financial responsibility for infrastructure necessary to support the project. The Hacienda Lakes, LLC DRI will pay impact fees to Collier County, and the project's residents will pay property taxes that will assist economic development in the County. A special purpose local government enabled by Chapter 190, F.S., known as the Hacienda Lakes CDD, hereinafter referred to as "CDD" may provide a mechanism for the funding, construction and operation of the Hacienda Lakes DRI's infrastructure. The applicant will also provide a portion of the right -of -way needed to access the Project internal road system from extensions of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and The Lord's Way. The Project is consistent with all relevant economic development goals and policies of the SWFRPC's Strategic Regional Policy Plan. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SupportUiearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.22 Emergency Preparedness The Hacienda Lakes DRI is located within the Category 2/3 Zone as depicted on the SLOSH Model. All lands intended for development are located within the Category 3 Zone, with preserves proposed in the Category 2 Zone. Responses have been provided for Question 23, and the Developer has coordinated with the Collier County Emergency Management Department to provide for appropriate hurricane preparedness mitigation. Natural Resources Goal II -15, Policy 1, Goal IV -8, Policy 1 and Goal IV -2, Policy 2, state that wetland areas should be protected, conserved and restored to maintain their value. Under Collier County's RFMU policies, the Hacienda Lakes DRI will require higher standards for retention of native vegetation, and requirements for restoration and enhancement, as well a dedication of conservation areas to fully utilize the opportunities provided for in those policies. Map I -3 has been prepared to reflect the location of the various Project development lands within, or adjacent to the Belle Mead Regionally Significant Resource #5 and the Picayune Strand State Forest Regionally Significant Resource #2. The Project proposes development on 100±acres, or approximately 6% of the total Project land area identified as the Belle Meade Regionally Significant Resource #5. The County is requiring a reservation of 27f acres within the Belle Meade Regionally Significant Resource #5 for the proposed Benfield Road corridor, which in fact is not needed by the DRI itself. No lands within the Project boundaries are identified as the Picayune Strand State Forest Regionally Significant Resource #2. The Project preserve areas include 1,544 acres, or nearly 90% of the total Project land area identified as the Belle Meade Regionally Significant Resource #5. The project is consistent with the goals, polices, and objectives of the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, which was reviewed and approved by DCA and other review agencies, including the RPC, and which furthers the objectives of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan, in particular by further Goals 2 and 3, through protection of natural resources and water resource management. The project, as stated, preserves some 1,544 acres adjacent to the Belle Meade Natural Resource Protection Area which is within the Belle Mead Regionally Significant Resource #5. Moreover the project will be designed to meet or exceed SFWMD and other applicable agencies requirements for water management and water quality treatment. Goal IV -3, Policy 5 and Goal IV -6, Policy 7 requires adequate potable water and central sewer systems. The Collier County Water -Sewer District will ultimately own the central water and sewer system conveyance system that supports the Hacienda Lakes DRI. Regional Transportation Goal V -3, Policy 2 states that land use plans should provide an appropriate mix of land uses to reduce unnecessary travel time. The intent of this policy is met by providing a full range of uses within the Hacienda Lakes DRI in a compact form, allowing for uses to be mixed horizontally. Goal V -6 relates to bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The Hacienda Lakes DRI has been designed to be pedestrian oriented, providing low -speed streets with sidewalks that traverse through the various components of the project. Many residents will be located within a five to ten minute Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 32 DRI ADA SuppoitHearings \QIO \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docz 5/10/2011 Pg.23 ® walk of the commercial center, and all residents will be within a two -mile bike ride of the commercial land uses. Goal V -12, Policy 6, explains that developments will be in conformance with area wide transportation plans and participate in the elimination of expected adverse impacts on the transportation system. The response to Question 21 demonstrates that the Hacienda Lakes DRI will be consistent with this policy. C. Describe how the proposed development will meet goals and policies contained in the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.), including, but not limited to, the goals addressing the following issues: housing, water resource, natural system and recreational lands, land use, public facilities, transportation, and agriculture. Response: Housina The Hacienda Lakes DRI will provide a wide range of single - family and multi - family units of varying sizes, types, which will be responsive to a wide range of income categories. Table 10.3.1: Hacienda Lakes Demographic Data, 2012 -2019 SF= Single Family; MF= Multifamily; Source: RERC, Collier County Public Schools, BEBR Table 10.3.2: Employment by Sector at Hacienda Lakes, 2012 -2019 Persons Per Children Per Total Office 0 Total Dwelling Units l Household 1 Total Household School Per Business Park 0 0 114 171 228 285 342 Age Househ Total Year 546 546 546 S ulation ,...,,., .. , Elementary School 0 0 2012 20 30 50 2.39 120 0.35 0.12 11 0.58 29 2013 100 150 250 2.39 598 0.35 0.12 53 0.58 145 2014 100 150 250 2.39 598 0.35 0.12 53 0.58 145 2015 100 150 250 2.39 598 0.35 0.12 53 0.58 145 2016 100 150 250 2.39 598 0.35 0.12 53 0.58 145 2017 100 150 250 2.39 598 0.35 0.12 53 0.58 145 2018 100 150 250 2.39 598 0.35 0.12 53 0.58 145 2019 84 126 210 2.39 502 0.35 0.12 44 0.58 122 Total 704 1,056 1,760 4,206 370 1,021 varying sizes, types, which will be responsive to a wide range of income categories. Table 10.3.1: Hacienda Lakes Demographic Data, 2012 -2019 SF= Single Family; MF= Multifamily; Source: RERC, Collier County Public Schools, BEBR Table 10.3.2: Employment by Sector at Hacienda Lakes, 2012 -2019 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SupporMearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.24 Office 0 57 128 199 199 199 199 199 Business Park 0 0 114 171 228 285 342 399 Retail 46 296 546 546 546 546 546 546 Elementary School 0 0 0 69 69 69 69 69 Hotel 0 0 68 68 68 68 68 68 Construction 113 507 645 569 548 548 548 427 Total Employment 159 860 1,501 1,622 1,658 1,715 1,772 1,708 Total Employment (less Construction) 46 353 856 1,053 1,110 1,167 1,224 1,281 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SupporMearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.24 LIM Source: RF.RC Table 10.3.A.3: Average Wage by NAICS Code Land Use Average Salary Office $64,692 Business Park $64,692 Retail $26,357 Elementary School $40,934 Hotel $31,779 Source: Agency for Workforce Innovation (ES -202) - Collier County; RERC Average Income in Collier Countv by Sector Water Resources New developments are required to be compatible with the existing local and regional water supplies. Consistent with this policy, the Collier County Water -Sewer District will provide water and wastewater services to the Hacienda Lakes DRI. The Collier County Water -Sewer District will ultimately own the central water and sewer system conveyance system that supports the Hacienda Lakes DRI. This goal also requires the protection of surface and groundwater quality and the promotion of water conservation and water reuse techniques. Utilization of the Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings\Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.25 Wage Ranges Midpoint Retail Office Hotel Total 777$25,792 $17,893 $19,343 $18,618 65 0 0 65 $19,344 $22,567 $20,956 192 0 0 192 $22,568 $25,791 $24,180 230 0 0 230 $29,015 $27,404 9 0 0 9 $29,016 $32,239 $30,628 0 81 68 149 $32,240 $35,399 $33,820 85 0 0 85 Low $35,400 $38,687 $37,044 0 0 0 0 $38,689 $41,911 $40,300 0 3 0 3 $41,913 $45,135 $43,524 44 30 0 74 $45,137 $48,359 $46,748 0 0 0 0 $48,361 $51,583 $49,972 0 6 0 6 $51,585 $55,452 $53,518 0 1 0 0 0 Moderate $54,809 $56,639 $55,724 0 0 0 0 $56,640 $61,256 $58,948 0 0 0 0 $61,257 $64,480 $62,868 0 69 0 69 $64,481 $67,704 $66,092 0 9 0 9 $67,705 $70,928 $69,316 0 0 0 0 $70,929 $74,152 $72,540 0 0 0 0 $74,153 $77,376 $75,764 0 0 0 0 $77,377 $80,600 $78,988 0 0 0 0 $80,601 $84,960 $82,781 0 0 0 0 Above $84,961 $86,730 $85,845 0 0 0 0 Moderate $86,731 $88,500 $87,615 0 0 0 0 $88,501 $90,270 $89,385 0 0 0 0 $90,271 $92,040 $91,155 0 0 0 0 $92,041 $93,810 $92,925 0 0 0 0 Total 1 625 198 68 891 Water Resources New developments are required to be compatible with the existing local and regional water supplies. Consistent with this policy, the Collier County Water -Sewer District will provide water and wastewater services to the Hacienda Lakes DRI. The Collier County Water -Sewer District will ultimately own the central water and sewer system conveyance system that supports the Hacienda Lakes DRI. This goal also requires the protection of surface and groundwater quality and the promotion of water conservation and water reuse techniques. Utilization of the Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings\Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.25 best management practices matrix and techniques will be used in the Hacienda Lakes DRI, consistent with the requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. Natural systems and recreational lands The State Comprehensive Plan encourages the protection and restoration of important ecological systems. Through the RFMUD policies, the Hacienda Lakes DRI will enhance and maintain a variety of valuable natural resources within the preserve areas of the project. Land Use The Hacienda Lakes DRI is one of the first developments that will implement the RFMUD policies to preserve critical natural resources while providing for residential and commercial economic diversity. Public Facility Adequate fire, police and emergency services will be available to the Hacienda Lakes DRI. Required impact fees and ad valorem taxes will be collected by Collier County to provide funding for these entities. Additionally, a 1.33 acre tract has been provided for a new EMS facility. Transportation The State Plan requires the coordination of transportation improvements with the State, Local ® and regional plans. The Hacienda Lakes DRI will be consistent with the transportation provisions of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan and the Regional MPO Plan. Part 4 Impact Summary A. Summarize the impacts this project will have on natural resources. Response: The Project site contains 1,752.72± acres of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) wetlands. The wetlands consist of freshwater systems including cypress, pine /cypress, and freshwater marsh habitats. The level of exotics found within the wetlands range from relatively exotic free habitats to monocultures of the exotics melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifoloius). Most notable is the heavy infestation on portions of the property by melaleuca, an exotic species listed as a Category I invasive exotic by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (EPPC) (EPPC 2009). In general, the habitats on site have a high degree of melaleuca coverage on the western and central portions of the property. The melaleuca infestation generally decreases towards the eastern portion of the site. The following listed wildlife species or their sign (i.e., burrow, scat, tracks, nest) have been observed on the Project site: American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), snowy egret (Egretta thula), little blue heron (Egretta caerulea), tri- colored heron (Egretta tricolor), roseate spoonbill (Ajaia ajaja), white ibis Q(Endocumis albus), wood stork (Mycteria americana), red - cockaded woodpecker Q:V005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q10 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).docx 5/10/2011 Pg.26 ( Picoides borealis ), bald eagle ( Haliaeetus leucoce P halus )� Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), and Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). No bald eagle nests are located on or adjacent to the property. To avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and listed species habitat, the Project has considered several different site designs. The site plan was designed to preserve the higher quality habitats on -site and to locate development areas within the lower quality exotic infested habitats described above. The site plan minimizes impacts to the higher quality wetlands and uplands on the east portion of the site adjacent to Picayune Strand State Forest. The on -site preserves were designed to connect to off -site preserves and to the Picayune Strand State Forest retaining connectivity of wildlife habitat. Since the Project was designed to avoid impacts to the higher quality uplands and wetlands, the development areas are generally located on the western portions of the property. It is estimated that the construction of the Project will result in wetland impacts to approximately 440 acres of wetlands. As discussed previously, the wetland impacts are mostly limited to the lower quality wetlands on -site. The Project's design preserves approximately 1,588 acres of wetlands and uplands (70 percent of the total site). The upland and wetland preserves are located along the east portion of the Project and south of Sabal Palm Road where the higher quality habitats Qoccur. The preserved wetlands will be enhanced and the wetland hydroperiods will be maintained to provide for the natural wet and dry cycles, which provides foraging and habitat for wading birds. The mitigation plan involves the enhancement and preservation of wetlands and uplands. Wetland and upland enhancement will include the hand- removal of exotic and nuisance vegetation and supplemental plantings installed in areas with greater than 50 percent exotic coverage. Of the 1,590± acres of preserves, 1,544± acres will be placed in a conservation easement or other equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the SFWMD. It is anticipated that portions of the preserves will be deeded to the state to compliment the Picayune Strand State Forest. The 46± acres of preserve not placed under conservation easement are located within existing easements on the Project site. Although these 46± acres will not be used as mitigation or placed under conservation easement, exotic vegetation will be removed from the habitats. Please refer to responses to Question 12 (Vegetation and Wildlife) and Question 13 (Wetlands) for additional information. REFERENCES Florida Exotic Pest Plan Council. 2009. List of Florida's Invasive Species. Florida Exotic Pest 10 Plant Council. Internet: http:// www.fleppc.org/list/List- WW -FO9- final.pdf Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRL -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Ql0 \Question 10 General Project Description (clean).do" 5/10/2011 Pg.27 QUESTION 11- REVENUE GENERATION SUMMARY See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (18); POLICIES (8), (9) GOAL (20); POLICY (7) The development program has changed materially since the prior submission. The accompanying data reflects the impacts of substantial modifications in the residential and non - residential components of the development program. All revenue estimates presented herein are presented in 2010 constant dollars. A. Project the funds anticipated to be generated by the project. This project should include any source or use of funds which could have any reasonable connection to the proposed development. 1. Make the following projections by year, including the first and last year in which any construction and /or development takes place: a. Yearly ad valorem tax receipts Response: The yearly ad valorem tax revenue estimated to be generated by the Hacienda .... Lakes project is shown in Table 11 -1. At build -out the project is anticipated to generate approximately $7,647,000 annually. Table 11 -1: Annual Ad Valorem Tax Receipts by Jurisdiction, 2012 -2031 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser; KLKC b. Yearly impact fees collected Response: Based on the land use program, the project is anticipated to generate Qapproximately $51,819,000 in total impact fees for Collier County and an additional $11,104,000 for the Collier County School Board. Table 11 -2 presents these fees by land use. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Ql I \Question I 1 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 1 Taxing Authority County Fire Control (Ea ` TOW Taxable County General Unincorporated School An. les &Golden Gate Tax Year 3.5645 $ - 68,000 0.7161 $ - 14,000 $ - 100,000 $ 29,000 $ 9,000 T $ 220,000 2012 2013 $ 19,168,000 2014 105,703,000 377,000 76,000 554,000 159,000 51,000 1,217,000 2015 211,123,000 753,000 151,000 1,106,000 317,000 102,000 2,429,000 2016 308,575,000 1,100,000 221,000 1,617,000 463,000 149,000 3,550,000 2017 402,903,000 1,436,000 289,000 2,111,000 604,000 194,000 4,634,000 2018 497,230,000 1,772,000 356,000 2,605,000 746,000 239,000 5,718.000 2019 591,558,000 2,109,000 424,000 3,099,000 887,000 285,000 6,804,000 2020 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2021 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2022 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2023 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2024 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2025 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2026 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2027 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2028 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2029 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2030 664,918,000 2,370,000 476,000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 2031 664,918,000 2,370,000 476.000 3,484,000 997,000 320,000 7,647,000 Total $36,055,000 $ 7,243,000 $ 53,000,000 $ 15,169,000 $4,869,000 $116,336,000 $10,115,276,000 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser; KLKC b. Yearly impact fees collected Response: Based on the land use program, the project is anticipated to generate Qapproximately $51,819,000 in total impact fees for Collier County and an additional $11,104,000 for the Collier County School Board. Table 11 -2 presents these fees by land use. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Ql I \Question I 1 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 1 Table 11 -2: Annual Ad Valorem Tax Receipts by Jurisdiction, 2012 -2031 Source: Collier County Impact Fee Schedule; RERC Yearly sales tax received by local government Response: The estimated annual sales tax generated by the project is shown in the following Table 11 -3. These annual estimates do include sales tax revenue associated with the project's construction materials purchased within Collier County. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Ql 1 \Question 1 I Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 2 Law Parks Parks Public Fire - E. Naples Collier Count .. Collier County Year Roads EMS meM $ 27.000 Jail Library Regional Community Bqj n s Water 6 Golden Gate Sower Total. QW 2012 S 927.000 $ 18 000 S 36,000 S 25.000 $ 92,000 $ 50,000 S 70.000 S 208.000 S 46.000 $ 203,000 $ 1,702000: $ 315,000 2013 4,798,000 81,000 135,000 277,000 106,000 397,000 216,000 359,000 904,000 172,000 884,000 8,329,000 ... 1,410,000 2014 6,440,000 95,000 159,000 306,000 106,000 537,000 284,000 447,000 1,054,000 188,000 1,031,000 10,647,000 :: 1,410,000 2015 3,262,000 71,000 83,000 108,000 137,000 494,000 269,000 226,000 1,023,000 260,000 1,000,000 6,933,000 :: 1,661,000 2016 2,843,000 67,000 78,000 98,000 137,000 494,000 269,000 205,000 983,000 260,000 961,000 6,395,000 :.::: 1,661,000 2017 2,843,000 67,000 78,000 98,000 137,000 494,000 269,000 205,000 983,000 260,000 961,000 6,395,000 ::: 1,661,000 2018 2,843,000 67,000 78,000 98,000 1 37,000 494,000 269,000 205,000 983,000 260,000 961,000 6,395,000 :::;: 1,661,000 2019 2,280,000 51,000 62,000 77,000 107,000 388,000 211,000 165,000 751,000 197,000 734,000 5,023,000 ::.;. 1,325,000 - 2020 - - - - - 2022 - - - - - - 2023 2024 - - - - - - 2025 - - - - - - - - 2026 - - - - - - - - -_ 2027 - - - - - - - - - 2028 2029 2030 - 2031 - - - - Total $ 26,236,000 $ 517,000 $ 700,000 $1,098,000 $ 892,000 $ 3,390,000 $1,837,000 $1,882,000 $ 6,689,000 $ 1,643,000 1 $ 6,735,000 1 51,819,000 :: $ 11,104,000 Source: Collier County Impact Fee Schedule; RERC Yearly sales tax received by local government Response: The estimated annual sales tax generated by the project is shown in the following Table 11 -3. These annual estimates do include sales tax revenue associated with the project's construction materials purchased within Collier County. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Ql 1 \Question 1 I Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 2 0 Table 11 -3: Annual Sales Tax Revenue Generated, 2012 -2031 Calac T Source: Florida Local Government Financial Handbook (2009); RERC d. Yearly gasoline tax received by local government Response: Collier County will receive gas tax revenue generated by the project. Table 11 -4 provides a detailed profile of the gas tax revenue, including a breakdown of the amount going to Collier County from such taxes as the state's constitutional fuel tax and all local option fuel taxes authorized by Collier County. Table 11 -4: Annual Gas Tax Revenues Generated, 2012 -2031 Ave Ann„e1 Avg. Anmrd' Taxable L oval GP"- Local Revenue t to Collier County ' Construction Construction Material Materials Purch. Retail Development Taxable Retail Hotel Rooms Hotel 6% State Sales C.1h., Total Distribution i Distribution in Share of Sales year C4n71WC1101t 4rss 1n CONitrr County (SF) Sales Available Revenue Tax Revenue Tourist Tax Sales Tax Collier County $ 2,000 $ 15,000 Taxes 2012 S 18838,000 $ 11,787,000 $ 2,475,000 27,500 $ 3,909,000 - $ - $ 345,000 $ - $ 345,000 $ 30,000 $ 27,000 2013 75,250,000 52,675,000 11,062,000 177,500 29,141,000 - - 2,171,000 - 2,171,000 191,000 432,000 380 170,000 384,000 2014 95,725,000 67,008,000 14,072,000 327,500 71,830,000 135 4,872,000 4,902,000 195,000 5,097,000 878,284 20,000 467,000 2015 84,375,000 59,063,000 12,403,000 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,965,000 195,000 6,160,000 526,000 1,059,692 21,000 2016 81,250,000 56,875,000 11,944,000 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,941,000 195,000 8,136,000 524,000 1,755,539 466,000 2017 61,250,000 56,875,000 11,944,000 327,500 93,196000 135 4,872,000 5,941,000 195,000 6,136,000 524,000 2019 466,000 2018 81,250,000 56,875,000 11,944,000 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,941,000 195,000 6,136,000 524,000 128,000 466,000 2019 63,400,000 44,380,000 9,320,000 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,799,000 195,000 5,994,000 511,000 12,000 454,000 2022 1,910,882 1,241,850 25,000 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 12,000 415,000 2020 - - - 1.241,950 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 53,000 415,000 2021 - 2024 1,910,692 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 62,000 415,000 2022 - - 2025 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 415,000 2023 - - - 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 63,000 415,000 2024 - - 12,000 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 75,000 415,000 2025 - - 12,000 327,500 93,186,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 250 415,000 2026 - - - 53.000 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 12,000 415,000 2027 - 82,000 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 500 415,000 2028 - - 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 25000 415,000 2029 - - 63.000 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195,000 5,491,000 467,000 21,109,349 415,000 2030 - - - - - 327,500 93,196,000 135 4,872,000 5,296,000 195 000 5,491,000 467,000 415,000 1 $ 100,557,000 $ 3,510,000 1 $104,067,000 $ 8,866,000 1 $ 7,880,000 2031 Total $ 579,338,000 $ 405,538,000 $ 85,164,000 1 1 Source: Florida Local Government Financial Handbook (2009); RERC d. Yearly gasoline tax received by local government Response: Collier County will receive gas tax revenue generated by the project. Table 11 -4 provides a detailed profile of the gas tax revenue, including a breakdown of the amount going to Collier County from such taxes as the state's constitutional fuel tax and all local option fuel taxes authorized by Collier County. Table 11 -4: Annual Gas Tax Revenues Generated, 2012 -2031 Source: Florida Local Government Financial Handbook (2009); RERC Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP10003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QI I \Question 11 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 11 Pg. 3 Ave Ann„e1 Avg. Anmrd' naatugonel L oval GP"- Local OPtb�i Ninth Cant ' .. nel Gas Gasoline P 'ad iax CoI1Lee County C.1h., Is cent) Gas Tax Collor 0 cent) Gas Tax Collier Gaa Tae Collier T. Proceeds Lo Gallons of Gasoline .... 53.276 390,171 of .: 34,629 253,811 $ 1,000 $ 5,000 10 100 lax._. anial $ - $ 3,000 10 50 $ 2,000 $ 15,000 2,000 13,000 CoOaotad. $ Amwalb 2,000 $ 13,000 8. 1,000 11,000 Cdbcted Ann,Wly.Cmt, $ - $! 3,000 Shar - 3,000 Con,er0ounty 5 3,000 27,000 2012 2013 2014 882,268 638,475 73,000 280 8,000 130 38,000 32,000 32,000 27,000 6,000 8,000 65,000 1,366,590 888,284 78,000 380 8,000 180 53,000 45,000 44,000 38,000 8,000 9,000 93,000 2015 1,505,053 878,284 20,000 400 10,000 200 59,000 50,000 49,000 41,000 10,000 10,000 102,000 2070 2017 1,830,286 1,059,692 21,000 430 11,000 220 84,000 54,000 53,000 45,000 11,000 11.000 711.000 2018 1,755,539 1,141.101 23.000 460 11,000 230 68,000 58,000 57,000 48,000 71,000 71,000 118,000 2019 1,864,426 1,211,877 24,000 490 12,000 250 73,000 82,000 61.000 51,000 12,000 12,000 128,000 2020 1.610.692 1,241,950 25,000 500 12,000 250 75,000 63,000 62.000 53,000 12,000 12,000 129,000 2022 1,910,882 1,241,850 25,000 500 12,000 250 75.000 83,000 62,000 53,000 12,000 12,000 129,000 2023 7,910,892 1.241,950 25,000 500 12,000 250 75,000 83,000 82,000 53,000 72,000 72,000 129,000 2024 1,910,692 1,241,950 25,000 500 12,000 250 75,000 63,000 62,000 53.000 72.000 12,000 129,000 2025 1,910,892 1,241,950 25,000 500 12.000 250 75,000 83,000 62,000 53,000 12,000 12,000 129,000 2028 1,870,892 1,241,950 25,000 500 12,000 250 75,000 63,000 82,000 53,000 12,000 12,000 729,000 2027 1,910,682 1,241,950 25,000 500 12,000 250 75,000 63,000 62.000 53,000 12,000 12,000 129,000 2028 1,910,892 1,241,950 25,000 500 12,000 250 75,000 63,000 62,000 53.000 12,000 12,000 129,000 2029 1,810,692 1,241,950 25,000 500 12,000 250 75,000 63,000 82,000 53,000 12,000 12,000 128,000 2030 1,910,692 1,241,950 25,000 500 12,000 250 75,000 83,000 82,000 53,000 12,000 12,000 129,000 2031 1,910,882 1,241,850 25000 500 72.000 250 75.000 63.000 62.000 53.000 12,000 12,000 129.000 Total 32,475922 21,109,349 $ 425.000 $ 8,510 $ 206,000 $ 4,270111 1,272,000 $1,072000 $ 1,055,000 $ 898000 $ 208,000 $ 208,000 $ 2183,000 Source: Florida Local Government Financial Handbook (2009); RERC Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP10003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QI I \Question 11 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 11 Pg. 3 E e. Yearly projections of any funds by any other sources generated as a result of development of the proposed project within the region. Response: There are no other significant revenue sources expected to be generated by the project. Although other sources might be expected, these are immaterial when compared to those provided. 2. List all assumptions used to derive the above projections and estimates, show the methodology used and describe the generally accepted accounting principles used in all assumptions, estimates and projections. Table 11 -5: Hacienda Lakes DRI Development Program, 2012 -2019 (a) Yearly ad valorem tax receipts Table 11 -1 presents the estimated annual ad valorem tax revenues associated with the development program by taxing authority. These tax revenues represent real property only. Real property tax receipts are driven by the value of the underlying land, the anticipated construction and opening of the project. Real property taxes associated with project improvements will start accruing in the first full year of operation following completion of construction. Specific assessed value assumptions used in this analysis are based on an analysis of comparable values from the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office. The following table summarizes the real taxable value assumptions used in this analysis for projecting property tax revenues. These assessments, which include the value of land and structures, are based on an analysis of available assessed value data for similar types of properties. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRl - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Suppon \Hearings \Ql I \Question I 1 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Ql 1 Pg. 4 Single Family Multifamily Retail Office Business Park Hotel (DU) (DU) SF (SF ) (SF Room 2012 20 30 27,500 0 0 0 2013 100 100 150,000 20,000 0 0 2014 100 100 150,000 25,000 40,000 135 2015 100 175 0 25,000 20,000 0 2016 100 175 0 0 20,000 0 2017 100 175 0 0 20,000 0 2018 100 175 0 0 20,000 0 2019 84 126 0 0 20,000 0 (a) Yearly ad valorem tax receipts Table 11 -1 presents the estimated annual ad valorem tax revenues associated with the development program by taxing authority. These tax revenues represent real property only. Real property tax receipts are driven by the value of the underlying land, the anticipated construction and opening of the project. Real property taxes associated with project improvements will start accruing in the first full year of operation following completion of construction. Specific assessed value assumptions used in this analysis are based on an analysis of comparable values from the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office. The following table summarizes the real taxable value assumptions used in this analysis for projecting property tax revenues. These assessments, which include the value of land and structures, are based on an analysis of available assessed value data for similar types of properties. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRl - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Suppon \Hearings \Ql I \Question I 1 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Ql 1 Pg. 4 �101 Table 11 -6: Taxable Values — Hacienda Lakes DRI Land Use Value Per Residential Collier County - Unincorporated 0.7161 Single Family $300,000 to $900,000 Unit Multifamily $200,000 to $600,000 Unit Non - Residential _ 0.4814 Total Millage General Office $125 SF Retail /Service $85 SF Hotel $110,000 Room /Key The adopted 2010 millage rates were applied to projected assessed values according to the development program. The 2010 Collier County Millage rates are summarized below by taxing authority. The millage is assumed to remain constant over the entire projection period. Table 11 -7: Millage Rates — Hacienda Lakes DRI Taxing Authority 2010 Mill. Rate Collier County — General 3.5645 Collier County - Unincorporated 0.7161 MSTU 0.7454 Fire 1.5000 County School Board 5.2390 SJWMD _ 0.4814 Total Millage 12.2464 (b) Yearly impact fees collected Estimated impact fees are based on fee schedules effective in 2010 for Collier County. The following table lists the current fees by type and land use. Although it is assumed these fees will remain the same throughout the life of the project, they may increase in the future. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QI 1 \Question I 1 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 5 QTable 11 -8: Impact Fee Schedule — Hacienda Lakes DRI room for hotel z Non - residential assumes 340 gpd equals impact fee rate gpd per Response: These fees were then applied to the development program to produce the annual impact fee collections from Hacienda Lakes. These results are presented in Table 11 -2. While not presented in Table 11 -2, it is reasonable to suggest the estimated impact fee collections are greater than the amount actually collected. The difference is due to contributions made in lieu of fees or results of other negotiations between the development team and affected jurisdictions. (c) Yearly sales tax receive by local government Response: Sales tax revenue associated with the project was derived from three sources: taxable sales generated from project construction, taxable sales generated from the retaillservice component of the development program, and taxable hotel use. The following paragraphs discuss the assumptions associated with each of the above sources as well as assumptions relating to tax rates and the appropriate redistribution of tax revenues to Collier County. Construction - related sales tax revenue was calculated from non -labor expenditures associated with the purchase of supplies and materials for the project. Because this project will be built by the private sector and for the private sector, the cost of supplies and materials were assumed to be 70% of the total cost of construction. This ratio would be significantly different if the project were undertaken by or built for the public sector. This is particularly the impact on construction costs from the Davis -Bacon Act, requiring prevailing wages for public works projects. For analysis purposes, it was assumed that 70% of these sales are taxable. It was further assumed that 30% of the taxable construction expenditures are captured within Collier QCounty. While these rates are based on prior experience with various private developers Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QI I \Question 11 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 6 Residential Non - Residential Single Family Multifamily Retail Office Hotel per DU DU 1,000 SF 1,000 SF Room Roads $ 10,372 $ 7,725 $ 16,893 $ 16,763 $ 6,578 EMS 129 129 236 158 54 Law Enforcement 359 194 476 228 103 Jail 492 254 642 365 203 Library 583 424 Parks - Regional 2,421 1,298 1,039 Parks - Community 1,316 711 503 Public Buildings 950 483 1,270 849 366 Water 1,2 3,575 3,575 3,575 3,575 3,575 Sewer 1'2 3,495 3,495 3,495 3,495 3,495 Nnn residential fees based on averaqe daily demand of 0.1 and 0.15 gpd per SF for retail and office uses and 100 room for hotel z Non - residential assumes 340 gpd equals impact fee rate gpd per Response: These fees were then applied to the development program to produce the annual impact fee collections from Hacienda Lakes. These results are presented in Table 11 -2. While not presented in Table 11 -2, it is reasonable to suggest the estimated impact fee collections are greater than the amount actually collected. The difference is due to contributions made in lieu of fees or results of other negotiations between the development team and affected jurisdictions. (c) Yearly sales tax receive by local government Response: Sales tax revenue associated with the project was derived from three sources: taxable sales generated from project construction, taxable sales generated from the retaillservice component of the development program, and taxable hotel use. The following paragraphs discuss the assumptions associated with each of the above sources as well as assumptions relating to tax rates and the appropriate redistribution of tax revenues to Collier County. Construction - related sales tax revenue was calculated from non -labor expenditures associated with the purchase of supplies and materials for the project. Because this project will be built by the private sector and for the private sector, the cost of supplies and materials were assumed to be 70% of the total cost of construction. This ratio would be significantly different if the project were undertaken by or built for the public sector. This is particularly the impact on construction costs from the Davis -Bacon Act, requiring prevailing wages for public works projects. For analysis purposes, it was assumed that 70% of these sales are taxable. It was further assumed that 30% of the taxable construction expenditures are captured within Collier QCounty. While these rates are based on prior experience with various private developers Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QI I \Question 11 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 6 within the region and the State of Florida, they reflect a conservative estimate of the impact from the purchase of construction sales and materials taxable in Collier County. Using industry standard figures found in Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers: 2008 for community shopping centers, the sales tax revenue associated with the retaiUservice component of the project is calculated based upon estimated gross sales of approximately $285 per square foot, including both taxable and non - taxable transactions. The resulting sales figure was adjusted to reflect the assumption that 90% of total gross sales are taxable. Sales taxes associated with hotel room usage were calculated based on an average occupancy rate of 57% and an average daily rate (ADR) of $175. These rates are consistent with those reported by the Collier County Convention and Visitors Bureau (CVB) over the previous two years. In 2008 the average ADR for Collier County was approximately $170, and in 2009 the ADR decreased slightly to about $160. The proposed hotel is expected to be developed with product equivalent to a Hilton Garden Inn and will perform substantially better than the averages reported by the Collier County CVB. It was assumed that once the hotel is constructed revenues will remain the same into the future. Another source of sales tax that will be collected is associated with rental revenue, derived from long term lease payments by tenants occupying the various non - residential components of the project. This is a small portion of the collected sales tax, and although it was acknowledged, for the purpose of this analysis, it was assumed to be marginal and therefore not calculated. The total Collier County sales tax rate consists of a 6.0% state sales tax rate. Only a portion of the 6.0% sales tax collected is returned to the county for distribution between the county and its municipalities. Each county in the state currently receives 8.814% of the total 6.0% state sales tax collected. This revenue is then divided between the county and its municipalities using population -based distribution factors. Accordingly, Collier County will receive nearly 88.86 %, of these revenues. The remaining revenues are divided amongst the other municipalities based on population. Table 11 -3 provides a detailed sales tax breakdown for the project. These figures include both recurring and non - recurring sales taxes. Non - recurring sales taxes include those associated with the construction of the project. These are one -time revenues that will cease after all construction activities are terminated. Recurring sales taxes include those taxes that will continue as long as the project and its components continue to operate. (d) Yearly gasoline tax received by local government Response: Gasoline tax revenue associated with the project was based on the following assumptions: • trip rates were obtained from the Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Study • assumptions of average miles per trip based on findings presented in Chapter 21 • average miles per gallon (20 miles) Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -PRP \0003 DR1- ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR1 ADA Support\Hearings \Ql 1 \Question 11 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 7 Q• given the trip lengths as presented in the Collier County Transportation Impact Fee Study as well as those reported in Question 21 of this ADA, it is reasonable to estimate that approximately 65% of the total fuel purchases resulting from the proposed project is purchased within Collier County NO These assumptions were employed to calculate the estimated fuel tax revenue generated by the project. The total applicable fuel tax rate for Collier County is presented in the following table. Table 11 -9: Gas Tax Rates — Hacienda Lakes DRI Fuel Txax — ... n ate (per -gallon) Constitutional Gas Tax $0.02 County Gas Tax $0.01 Local Option Gas Tax (1 -6 $0.06 cent) Local Option Gas Tax (1 -5 $0.05 cent) Ninth Cent Voted Gas Tax $0.01 The constitutional and county gas taxes are among the various state - shared revenue programs and are only shared at the county level. Gross proceeds from these taxes were multiplied by a distribution factor — currently 2.0322% for Collier County — to arrive at the local county distribution. The two local option gas taxes are local option revenue generation programs set forth by the county. Presently Collier County receives 84.66% of both local option gas taxes Table 11 -4 presents the annual projected gas tax revenues for the project. (e) Yearly projections of any other funds by any other sources generated as a result of development of the proposed project within the region Response: There were no calculations made and therefore no associated assumptions for this category Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI. ADA \Sublask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QI I \Question 1 l Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 8 APPENDIX 11 -1 SOURCE DATA FOR QUESTION 11 HACIENDA LAKES DRI Property Tax Ad Valorem Millage Collier County 3.5645 Mills Unincorporated 0.7161 Mills Fire 1.5 Mills County Millage Rate 3.5645 Mills Water Management District 0.4814 Mills School 5.239 Mills 'Population City Population (total) 332,854 (Florida Statistical Abstract, 2009) Full -Time Single - Family Equivalent Population - Working Residents Population- Non - Working Residents Population- Seasonal Population (peak season) Collier County Employment (total) (Florida Statistical Abstract, 2009) County Labor Force Participation Rate (Florida Statistical Abstract, 2009) - Table 6.11 County Population (unincorporated) (Florida Statistical Abstract, 2009) 146,720 111,786 =everything except the 40 hour workweek 186,134 186,134 2,386 895 = 4.5 months occupancy 335,240 298,815 146,720 34,934 = 40 hour work week 292,794 Persons per Household 2.39 (Florida Statistical Abstract, 2009) - Collier County 1.5 Guess Employment C, Office Class A • 350 sq. ft. per employee Business Park 350 sq. ft. per employee 680 ft. emipleyee Rete" Hotel sq. per 0.5 employees per room School (per Students) 0.075 employees per student IM Hotel Assumptions Average Occupancy 57% (Visit Florida's Key Tourism Indicators for the state as a whole) Average Persons per Room 1.5 Guess Total Number of Rooms 4,519 (Florida Statistical Abstract, 2009, Table 19.60, number of units of licensed h Average Daily Rate $105.00 (Visit Florida's Key Tourism Indicators for the state as a whole) Full Time Equivalent Tourists 3,830 Growth Rates Property Values 0.0% Retail Sales 0.0% Property Land Use Type Value Source Single - Family $350,000 Developer Single- Family $450,000 Developer Single - Family $550,000 Developer Single - Family $650,000 Developer Single - Family $750,000 Developer Single - Family $850,000 Developer Multifamily $250,000 Developer Multifamily $350,000 Developer Multifamily $450,000 Developer Multifamily $550,000 Developer Office Class A (sq.ft.) $125 (Comps Collier Cnty 2009 NAL data) Business Park (sq.ft.) $125 (Comps Collier Cnty 2009 NAL data) Retail $85 (Comps Collier Cnty 2009 NAL data) Hotel (per room) $110,000 (Comps Collier Cnty 2009 NAL data) Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI.- ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support \Hearings \Q1 1 \Question 11 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 9 APPENDIX 11 -1, CON'T SOURCE DATA FOR QUESTION 11 HACIENDA LAKES DRI Sales Tax 1/2 Cent Sales Tax Distribution Factor 8.814% (Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2006) % of Sales Taxable 90.0% (Florida DOR) County % of Gross 88.859% (Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2006) City % of Gross (if applicable) 0.0% (Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2006) Local Option Sales Tax - COUNTY $0.000 (Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2006) Local Option Sales Tax - SCHOOLS $0.000 (Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2006) Tourist Tax Percent 4.0% (Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2006) Median Neighborhood Retail Sales /Sq.Ft. $338.54 (Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, 2008) Median Community Retail Sales /Sq.Ft. $284.30 (Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, 2008) Median Regional Retail Sales /Sq.Ft. $267.53 (Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, 2008) Median Sit -Down Restaurant Sales /Sq.Ft. $357.98 (Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, 2008) Median Fast Food Restaurant Sales /Sq.Ft. $410.27 (Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, 2008) Hotel Average Price per Room $175.00 (Comp ADR per planned hotel type) Gas Tax Constitutional GasTax / Gallon $0.02 (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) Local Option GasTax (1-6) / Gallon $0.06 (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) Local Option GasTax (1 -5) / Gallon $0.05 (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) County GasTax / Gallon $0.01 (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) One Cent Voted GasTax / Gallon $0.00 (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) Ninth Cent Voted GasTax / Gallon $0.01 (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) Total Gas Tax per Gallon $0.15 % of Fuel Purchased in County ® Const. Fuel Tax County Distribution Factor - Court County Distribution of Local Option 1 County Distribution of Local Option 2 County Fuel Tax Distribution Factor 65.0% 2.0322% (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) 84.66% (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) 84.66% (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) 2.0322% (per Local Government Financial Information Handbook, 2009) Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QI I \Question 11 Revenue Generation.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q11 Pg. 10 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 12 VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE DixTA "C Planning Visualization ('O N S t.! 1 . MN( Engineering 1 %,. T T1 J Surveying QUESTION 12 — VEGETATION AND WILDLIFE See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (9); POLICY (7) GOAL (10); POLICIES (1), (3), (4), (6) GOAL (16); POLICY (2) A. Identify the dominant species and other unusual or unique feature of the plant communities on Map F. Identify and describe the amount of all plant communities that will be preserved in a natural state following development as shown on Map H. Response: Vegetation mapping of the Project site was first conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI) between January and August 2002 and in March 2003 utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) (Florida Department of Transportation 1999). Wetland lines were flagged in the field and survey located. Mapping was based on Level III FLUCFCS with Level IV used to denote hydrologic conditions and disturbance. "E" codes were used to show levels of exotic invasion (i.e., Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) and melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinquenervia)). In August 2009, PAI conducted fieldwork to update the FLUCFCS map for the Hacienda Lakes DRI to reflect current conditions due to wildfires that occurred over the past several years and the spread of invasive exotic plant species, especially melaleuca. The wetland lines were re- flagged in the field and survey located in August through December 2009. Verification and approval of the wetland lines by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) are pending as part of the Project's Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) application (SFWMD Application No. 100126 -5). AutoCAD Map 3D 2009 software was used to determine the acreage of each mapping area, produce summaries, and generate the final FLUCFCS and Wetlands maps (Maps F, F -1, and F -2). A total of 64 vegetative associations and land uses (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) were identified on the Project site. The dominant vegetation type on the site is Pine /Cypress, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6249). In general, the habitats on the Project site have a high degree of infestation by melaleuca on the western and central portion of the property. The melaleuca infestation generally decreases towards the eastern portion of the site. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12\Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 1 Me AD Table 12.A -1 summarizes the FLUCFCS codes and provides an acreage breakdown, while a description of each FLUCFCS code follows. Table 12.A -1. FLUCFCS Codes and Acreages FLUCFCS Code Description Acreage Percent of Total 180 Recreational 79.89 3.5 212 Unim roved Pasture 9.14 0.4 260 Rural Open Land 10.54 0.5 262 Low Pasture, H dric 54.43 2.4 3219 E1 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 27.81 1.2 3219 E2 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 12.60 0.6 3219 E3 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 3.71 0.2 3219 E4 Palmetto Prairie, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) 5.75 0.3 4119 E1 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 90.01 4.0 4119 E2 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 143.78 6.4 4119 E3 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 23.49 1.0 4119 E4 Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) 0.35 <0.1 4159 E2 Pine, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 6.77 0.3 4159 E3 Pine, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 10.78 0.5 4159 E4 Pine, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) 6.47 0.3 4221 Brazilian Pepper, H dric 1.81 0.1 424 Melaleuca 13.70 0.6 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric 345.07 15.3 4269 E1 Tropical Hardwood Hammock, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 0.40 <0.1 4269 E2 Tropical Hardwood Hammock, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 2.25 0.1 4279 El Live Oak, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 3.89 0.2 4279 E2 Live Oak, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 0.29 <0.1 4289 E1 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 1.20 0.1 4289 E2 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 19.08 0.8 4289 E3 Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 3.25 0.1 4349 E1 Hardwood- Conifer, Mixed, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 1.47 0.1 514 Ditch 3.38 0.1 6189 E1 Willow, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 10.97 0.5 6189 E2 Willow, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 2.48 0.1 6219 El Cypress, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 157.74 7.0 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 27.66 1.2 6219 E3 Cypress, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 1.45 0.1 62459 E2 Pine /Cypress, Drained, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 1.32 0.1 62459 E3 Pine/Cypress, Drained, Disturbed 2.36 0.1 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hcarings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 2 X Recreational (FLUCFCS Code 180) This area is occupied by the Florida Sports Park with associated parking areas and facilities. Unimproved Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212) QThis upland land type identifies areas that are part of an abandoned agricultural field. The canopy and sub - canopy of this upland habitat are mostly open with scattered slash Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 3 (50 - 75% Exotics) 6249 E1 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 289.16 12.8 6249 E2 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed (25- 49% Exotics) 327.32 14.5 6249 E3 Pine/Cypress, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 258.23 11.4 6249 E4 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) 27.86 1.2 624B E2 Pine /Cypress, Burned (25 -49% Exotics) 22.90 1.0 624B E3 Pine/Cypress, Burned (50 -75% Exotics) 9.56 0.4 6259 E1 Hydric Pine, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 31.52 1.4 6259 E2 Hydric Pine, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 27.86 1.2 6259 E3 Hydric Pine, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 63.26 2.8 6259 E4 Hydric Pine, Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) 12.00 0.5 625B E3 Hydric Pine, Burned (50 - 75% Exotics) 1.22 0.1 6289 E1 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 2.64 0.1 6289 E2 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 6.94 0.3 6289 E3 Hydric Cabbage Palm, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 2.09 0.1 6309 E1 Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 19.90 0.9 6309 E2 Wetland Forested Mixed, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 7.21 0.3 6319 E3 Wetland Shrub, Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) 5.83 0.3 6419 E1 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) 6.82 0.3 6419 E2 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) 10.63 0.5 740 Disturbed Land 3.21 0.1 7401 Disturbed Land, Hydric 18.16 0.8 742 Borrow Area 5.38 0.2 743 Spoil 0.16 <0.1 747 Berm 0.93 <0.1 814 Road 0.32 <0.1 8146 Unpaved Road 4.33 0.2 830 Utilities 1.08 <0.1 8301 Utilities, Hydric 4.82 0.2 832 Powerline Easement 1.24 0.1 8321 Powerline Easement, Hydric 4.27 0.2 Totals 2,262.14 100.0 Recreational (FLUCFCS Code 180) This area is occupied by the Florida Sports Park with associated parking areas and facilities. Unimproved Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212) QThis upland land type identifies areas that are part of an abandoned agricultural field. The canopy and sub - canopy of this upland habitat are mostly open with scattered slash Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 3 pine (Pinus elliottii), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), and young melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinquenervia). The ground cover is dominated by bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), and smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus) with dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), St. Augustine grass (Stenotaphrum secundatum), carpetgrass (Axonopus spp.), blackroot (Pterocaulon virgatum), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus), caesarweed (Urena lobata), shrubby false buttonweed (Spermacoce verticillata), and love grass (Eragrostis spp.) Rural Open Land (FLUCFCS Code 260) This upland land type identifies an old agricultural area that includes two old farm buildings. The canopy vegetation includes slash pine and cabbage palm. Sub -canopy vegetation is mostly absent with occurrences of cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), and melaleuca. The ground cover vegetation is similar to Unimproved Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212). Low Pasture Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 262) This wetland land type identifies areas that are part of an abandoned agricultural field. The canopy and sub -canopy of are mostly open with scattered slash pine, cabbage palm, melaleuca, and cypress (Taxodium spp.). The ground cover is dominated by torpedograss (Panicum repens), and includes a variety of upland, wetland, and transitional herbaceous species which vary by season. Q Palmetto Prairie Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 3219 Ell The canopy of this upland habitat is absent or may contain scattered slash pine, cabbage palm, earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and less than 25 percent melaleuca. The sub -canopy contains saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto and contains varying combinations of beautyberry (Callicarpa americana), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia), staggerbush (Lyonia fruiticosa), hog plum (Prunus umbellata), gallberry (Ilex glabra), bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum), wiregrass (Aristida stricta), pennyroyal (Piloblephis rigida), muscadine grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), greenbrier (Smilax spp.), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), love vine (Cassytha filiformis), and Virginia creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia). Palmetto Prairie Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 3219Y2 1 The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 3219 El with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and/or sub - canopy. Palmetto Prairie Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 3219 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 3219 E1 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Palmetto Prairie Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 3219_E4 ) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 3219 E1 with greater than 75 Qpercent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and/or sub - canopy. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 12 Pg. 4 QPine Flatwoods Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 El) The canopy of this upland habitat is dominated by slash pine and may contain scattered cabbage palm, live oak, earleaf acacia, and less than 25 percent melaleuca. The sub - canopy consists of slash pine, wax myrtle, with occasional dahoon holly (Ilex casine), and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto with varying combinations of gallberry, saltbush, muscadine grapevine, greenbrier, love vine, poison ivy, pennyroyal, bracken fern, and beautyberry. Pine Flatwoods Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4119 E1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Pine Flatwoods Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4119 E1 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Pine Flatwoods Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E4) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4119 E1 with greater than 75 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Pine Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4159E2 I The canopy of this upland habitat contains slash pine with scattered cabbage palm, 10 earleaf acacia, and melaleuca. The sub - canopy contains slash pine, cabbage palm, melaleuca, and Brazilian pepper. Typical ground cover includes cabbage palm, bahiagrass, wax myrtle, ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), pennyroyal, wild coffee (Psychotria sp.), greenbrier, muscadine grapevine, love vine, and widely scattered saw palmetto. Pine Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4159 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Pine Disturbed (76 -100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E4) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4159 E2 with greater than 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy. Brazilian Pepper Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 4221) The canopy of this highly disturbed wetland area is dominated by Brazilian pepper and may contain occasional melaleuca, slash pine and cypress. The sub -canopy is dominated by Brazilian pepper with wax myrtle and/or saltbush. The ground cover is absent or may include sparse asiatic pennywort (Centella asiatica), frog -fruit (Phyla nodiflora), dog fennel, water pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata), buttonweed (Diodia virginiana), and /or mock bishop's weed (Ptilimnium captillaceum). Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRl - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 5 QMelaleuca (FLUCFCS Code 424) The canopy of this highly disturbed upland area is dominated by melaleuca with widely scattered slash pine. The sub -canopy consists of melaleuca and Brazilian pepper. Ground cover is generally sparse and may include saltbush, wiregrass, broomsedge, dog fennel, myrsine (Rapanea punctata), creeping oxeye (Sphagneticola trilobata), and /or poison ivy. Melaleuca Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 4241) This highly disturbed wetland area consists of a canopy dominated by melaleuca and may contain widely scattered slash pine and /or cypress. The sub - canopy may be sparse or dense with melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, slash pine, wax myrtle, and saltbush. The ground cover is often bare ground/leaf litter, or may consist of a combination of yellow -eyed grass (Xyris spp.), hatpins (Eriocaulon decangulare), rush fuirena (Fuirena scirpoidea), sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum), creeping oxeye, and /or climbing hempvine (Mikania scandens). Several of the areas identified by this code were previously pine /cypress habitats with high degrees of melaleuca whose vegetative composition has been altered by wildfires. Most pine and cypress trees in the canopy were killed by the wildfires, while the melaleuca trees persisted. Tropical Hardwood Hammock Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4269 E1) The canopy of this upland habitat contains live oak (Quercus virginicus), laurel oak Q (Quercus laurifolia), cabbage palm, and scattered slash pine and gumbo limbo (Bursera simaruba). The sub - canopy typically consists of myrsine, coco -plum (Chrysobalanus icaco), cabbage palm, red mulberry (Mores rubra), and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes wild coffee, Boston fern (Nephrolepis exaltata), swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), cabbage palm, greenbrier, and scattered saw palmetto. Tropical Hardwood Hammock Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4269Y2 1 The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4269 E1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Live Oak Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4279 E1) The canopy of this upland community type contains live oak, laurel oak, and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy contains wax myrtle and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes saw palmetto, caesarweed, saltbush, poison ivy, greenbrier, and wild coffee. Live Oak Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4279 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4279 E1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Cabbase Palm, Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4289 E1 The canopy of this upland habitat contains cabbage palm, slash pine, and melaleuca. The sub - canopy contains cabbage palm, myrsine, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover Q includes wax myrtle, Brazilian pepper, caesarweed, saw palmetto, bahiagrass, and flatsedge (Cyperus spp.). A few of the areas identified by this code were previously pine Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \QI2 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 6 flatwoods whose vegetative composition has been altered by wildfires. Most pine trees were killed in the wildfires while cabbage palm and melaleuca survived. Cabbage Palm Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4289 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4289 E1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. A few of the areas identified by this code were previously pine flatwoods whose vegetative composition has been altered by wildfires. Most pine trees were killed in the wildfires while cabbage palm and melaleuca survived. Cabbage Palm Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4289 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 4289 E1 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. A few of the areas identified by this code were previously pine flatwoods whose vegetative composition has been altered by wildfires. Most pine trees were killed in the wildfires while cabbage palm and melaleuca survived. Hardwood Conifer Mixed Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4349 E1) This upland community has a canopy consisting of slash pine, live oak, laurel oak, and cabbage palm. The sub - canopy contains dahoon holly, wax myrtle, myrsine, Brazilian pepper, and cabbage palm. The ground cover includes saw palmetto, dog fennel, caesarweed, and wild coffee. ® Ditch (FLUCFCS Code 514) The canopy is typically open. The sub -canopy may contain Brazilian pepper, Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana), and primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana). The ground cover typically consists of paragrass (Urochloa mutica), dotted smartweed (Polygonum punctatum), pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata), arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia), and cattail (Typha spp.). Willow Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6189 E1) The canopy and sub - canopy of this wetland habitat is dominated by Carolina willow and may include buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), primrose willow, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover typically consists of sawgrass, fireflag (Thalia geniculata), arrowhead, pickerelweed, peppervine, paragrass, saltbush, and /or asiatic pennywort. Willow Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6189 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6189 E1 with 25 to 49 percent exotics in the canopy and sub - canopy. Cress Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6219 E1) The canopy of this wetland habitat is dominated by cypress and may also include red maple (Acer rubrum), swamp bay (Persea palustris), cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The sub - canopy may contain Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, cabbage palm, myrsine, pond apple (Annona glabra), and buttonbush. The ground cover includes maidencane (Panicum Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRi ADA Suppori\Heatings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 7 hemitomon), wax myrtle, rush fuirena, corkwood (Stillingia aquatica), swamp fern, beakrush (Rhynchospora spp.), and giant leather fern (Acrostichium danaeifolium). Cypress Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6219Y21 The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6219 E1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Cypress Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6219 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6219 E1 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Pine /Cypress Disturbed and Drained (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 62459 E21 This historically hydric community no longer exhibits signs of hydrology and, therefore, was mapped as an upland community. The canopy consists of slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The sub -canopy contains slash pine, cabbage palm, downy rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa), and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes muscadine grapevine, caesarweed, dog fennel, poison ivy, cabbage palm, and scattered saw palmetto. Pine /Cypress Disturbed and Drained (50 - 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 62459 E31 The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 62459 E2 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca, downy rose myrtle and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and/or sub - canopy. Pine /Cypress Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6249 E1) The canopy of this wetland habitat typically consists of slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The sub -canopy may contain slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, melaleuca, and/or Brazilian pepper. The ground cover consists of a combination of swamp fern, rush fuirena, corkwood, water pennywort, rosy camphorweed (Pluchea rosea), and cabbage palm. Pine /Cypress Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6249 E1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Pine /Cypress Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6249 E1 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and/or sub - canopy. Pine /Cypress Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6249 E41 The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6249 E1 with greater than 75 percent melaleuca in the canopy. Pine /Cypress Burned (25 — 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 624B E2) Q This code identifies areas burned by a wildfire in May 2009. Prior to the wildfire, the community type was identified as FLUCFCS Code 6249 E2. At the time the FLUCFCS Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRL - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 12 Pg. 8 Qmap was updated, the living vegetative community was not evident due to the recent damage by the wildfire (i.e., dead pine and cypress trees, no recruiting vegetation); therefore, the area was assigned the code and exotic level of the habitat prior to the wildfire and denoted with a `B'. Pine /Cypress Burned (50 — 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 624B E3) This code identifies areas burned by a wildfire in May 2009. Prior to the wildfire, the community type was identified as FLUCFCS Code 6249 E2. At the time the FLUCFCS map was updated, the living vegetative community was not evident due to the recent damage by the wildfire (i.e., dead pine and cypress trees, no recruiting vegetation); therefore, the area was assigned the code and exotic level of the habitat prior to the wildfire and denoted with a `B'. Pine Hydric Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6259 E1) The canopy of this wetland habitat consists of slash pine and melaleuca with scattered cabbage palm and earleaf acacia. The sub - canopy contains slash pine, melaleuca, myrsine, dahoon holly, cypress, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes sawgrass, blue maidencane, corkwood, yellow -eyed grass, gulf muhly (Muhlenbergia capillaris), gulfdune paspalum (Paspalum monostachyum), and /or rush fuirena. Pine Hydric Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6259 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6259 E1 with 25 to 49 percent Qmelaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and /or sub - canopy. Pine Hydric Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6259 E3) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6259 E1 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and/or sub - canopy. Pine Hydric Disturbed (76 - 100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6259 E41 The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6259 E1 with greater than 75 percent melaleuca in the canopy. Hydric Pine Burned (50 — 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 625B E3) This code identifies areas burned by a wildfire in May 2009. Prior to the wildfire, the community type was identified as FLUCFCS Code 6259 E3. At the time the FLUCFCS map was updated, the living vegetative community was not evident due to the recent damage by the wildfire (i.e., dead pine and cypress trees, no recruiting vegetation); therefore, the area was assigned the code and exotic level of the habitat prior to the wildfire and denoted with a `B'. Hydric Cabbage Palm Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6289 E1) The canopy of this wetland habitat contains cabbage palm, scattered slash pine, myrsine, and less than 25 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper. The sub -canopy consists of cabbage palm, slash pine, and melaleuca. The ground cover includes cabbage palm, swamp fern, dog fennel, asiatic pennywort, rush fuirena, yellow -eyed grass, and occasional saw palmetto. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DIU -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 9 Hvdric Cabbage Palm Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6289 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6289 El with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Hvdric Cabbage Palm Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6289F3 The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6289 E1 with 50 to 75 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Wetland Forested Mixed Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6309 El) The canopy consists of cypress, laurel oak, red maple, cabbage palm, and melaleuca. The sub - canopy contains pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana), cabbage palm, myrsine, wax myrtle, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes swamp fern, sawgrass, greenbrier, and asiatic pennywort. Wetland Forested Mixed Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6309 E21 The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6309 E1 with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Wetland Shrub Disturbed (50 - 75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6319 E3) The canopy and sub -canopy of this wetland habitat typically contains Carolina willow, primrose willow, Brazilian pepper with scattered wax myrtle, buttonbush, cypress, and/or melaleuca. The ground cover in many areas is dominated by paragrass and /or torpedograss and may include pepper vine (Ampelopsis arborea), swamp fern, sawgrass, pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata), arrowhead (Saggitaria lancifolia), fireflag, maidencane, and asiatic pennywort. Freshwater Marsh Disturbed (0 - 24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6419 E1) The canopy is open with widely scattered cypress. The sub - canopy is open with scattered Brazilian pepper, Carolina willow, and/or primrose willow. The ground cover consists of pickerelweed, arrowhead, fireflag, spikerush (Eleocharis interstincta), smartweed, maidencane, and torpedograss. Freshwater Marsh Disturbed (25 - 49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6419 E2) The vegetation associations are similar to FLUCFCS Code 6419 El with 25 to 49 percent melaleuca and /or Brazilian pepper in the canopy and sub - canopy. Disturbed Land (FLUCFCS Code 740) The canopy and sub - canopy strata are generally open with scattered cabbage palm, melaleuca saplings, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover contains species typical to disturbed areas including dog fennel, ragweed, caesarweed, creeping oxeye, sweetbroom (Scoparia dulcis), white beggarticks (Bidens pilosa), sandspur (Cenchrus spp.), smutgrass, saw palmetto, smutgrass, and bahiagrass. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Suppott\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 10 D� Disturbed Land Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 7401) The canopy and sub - canopy strata are typically open and may contain scattered wax myrtle, melaleuca and/or Brazilian pepper. Ground cover vegetation is generally absent, or may contain torpedograss, blue maidencane, frog - fruit, rosy camphorweed, yellow - eyed grass, bushy broomsedge (Andropogon glomeratus), and asiatic pennywort. Borrow Area (FLUCFCS Code 742) These open water habitats include areas of emergent and littoral vegetation including cattail and spikerush. Spoil (FLUCFCS Code 743) The canopy stratum of this disturbed area is open. The sub - canopy contains Brazilian pepper. Ground cover vegetation includes dog fennel, creeping oxeye, and Brazilian pepper. Berm (FLUCFCS Code 747) The canopy of this altered area contains scattered slash pine, cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper and /or melaleuca. The sub -canopy contains Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes species typical in upland disturbed areas including dog fennel, ragweed, caesarweed, white beggar- ticks, and Brazilian pepper. Road (FLUCFCS Code 814) This code identifies areas occupied by paved roads. Unpaved Road (FLUCFCS Code 8146) This code identifies areas occupied by unpaved roads. Utilities (FLUCFCS Code 830) This upland area was cleared for, and is occupied by utilities, specifically Collier County's South County Water Treatment Plant Well Field. The ground cover includes smutgrass, bahiagrass, and /or carpetgrass. Utilities Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 8301) This wetland area was cleared for, and is occupied by utilities, specifically Collier County's South County Water Treatment Plant Well Field. The canopy and sub - canopy strata are open. The ground cover is absent in some areas or may contain torpedograss, bahiagrass, carpetgrass, beaksedge, frog -fruit, bushy broomsedge, and rosy camphorweed. Powerline Easement (FLUCFCS Code 832) This area is occupied by Florida Power and Light electrical transmission lines. The canopy and sub - canopy are open. Ground cover vegetation is absent in some areas or may consist of bahiagrass, smutgrass, and/or carpetgrass. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \QI2 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 12 Pg. 11 OPowerline Easement Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 8321) This area is occupied by Florida Power and Light electrical transmission lines and access road. The canopy and sub - canopy are open. Ground cover vegetation is absent in some areas or may consist of torpedograss, bahiagrass, blue maidencane, flatsedge, pickerel weed, frog -fruit, bushy broomsedge, and /or rosy camphorweed. The Project includes 1,590± acres of upland and wetland preserve areas, including upland buffers. The majority of the proposed wetland preserve areas consist of cypress, pine - cypress, and hydric pine habitats ranging in quality based on exotic coverage and water quality. The uplands proposed for preservation consist mostly of pine flatwoods. Table 12A -2 summarizes the post - development preserve area FLUCFCS codes and provides an approximate acreage breakdown. Table 12.A -2. Post - Development Preserve Area FLUCFCS Codes and Acreages FLUCFCS Code Description Approximate Acreage 310 Dry Prairie 9.4 321 Palmetto Prairie 39.9 411 Pine Flatwoods 179.4 415 Mixed Pine 23.2 426 Tropical Hardwood Hammock 2.6 427 Live Oak 4.2 428 Cabbage Palm 3.7 434 Hardwood/Conifer, Mixed 1.5 514 Ditch 0.6 618 Willow 13.4 621 Cypress 224.0 624 Pine /Cypress /Cabbage Palm 882.5 625 Hydric Pine 110.0 628 Hydric Cabbage Palm 11.3 630 Wetland Forested Mixed 18.8 631 Wetland Shrub 0.5 641 Freshwater Marsh 50.5 742 Borrow Pond 5.1 7401 Disturbed Land, Hydric 4.5 8146 Unpaved Road 4.0 740 Disturbed Land 0.9 PRESERVE AREA TOTAL 1,590.0 B. Discuss what survey methods were used to determine the absence to presence of state or federal listed wildlife and plants. (Sampling methodology should be agreed to by the regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at pre - application conferencing Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support \Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 12 N1 LO-] stage.) State actual sampling times and dates, and discuss any factors that may have influenced the results of the sampling effort. Show on Map G the location of all transects, trap grids, or other samplings stations used to determine the on -site status of state or federal listed wildlife and plant resources. Response: Surveys for listed plant and wildlife species have been conducted on the Project site over the past several years by Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI). Listed species surveys were conducted on the following dates: September 10, 11, 18, and 19, 2002; October 16, 17, and 18, 2002; November 12, 13, 14, and 15, 2002; June 4, 5, 24, 25, and 26, 2003; October 10, 11, 17, 19, 25, and 26, 2006; and November 14, 2006. On August 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, and 25, 2009, PAI conducted an updated listed species survey for the Project. The 2002, 2003, 2006, and 2009 surveys were performed in accordance with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) guidelines. Survey methodologies used were also consistent with Standardized State - Listed Animal Survey Procedures for Use in the Review of SWFRPC Projects (Beever 2006). Sampling dates, amount of effort expended, and qualitative descriptions of weather conditions experienced during the survey periods are listed in Table 12.13-1. Table 12.13-1. Listed Species Survey Dates, Times, and Weather Conditions Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD•DRI-ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppo&Heacings \Q1 2 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 13 a er on on Partly cloudy, light winds, temperatures in mid September 10, 2002 24.0 to upper 80s. Cloudy with light rain showers, calm, September 11, 2002 8.0 temperatures in mid 80s. Mostly sunny with an afternoon rain shower, September 18, 2002 28.0 light winds, temperatures in upper 80s to low 90s. Mostly sunny, light winds, temperatures in September 19, 2002 24.0 upper 80s to low 90s. Mostly sunny, light winds, temperature in upper October 16, 2002 9.0 80s. October 17, 2002 21.0 Clear, mostly calm, temperatures in low 80s. Mostly sunny, light winds, temperatures in low October 18, 2002 20.0 to mid 80s. Partly cloudy, light winds, temperature in upper November 12, 2002 16.0 80s. November 13, 2002 16.0 Clear skies, windy, temperatures in low 70s. Partly cloudy, light winds, temperatures in the November 14, 2002 20.0 lower 80s. Mostly cloudy with scattered showers, no wind, June 4, 2003 24 .0 temperatures in mid 80s. June 5, 2003 12.0 Mostly cloudy with rain, no wind, temperatures Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD•DRI-ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppo&Heacings \Q1 2 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 13 X U Surveys were conducted for wildlife species listed by the FWCC and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern; and for plant species listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) and USFWS as endangered, threatened, or commercially exploited. The FWCC publication, "Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern; Official Lists" dated 2009 was used as a reference to identify the status of listed species in Florida. The USFWS Threatened and Endangered Species Database System (TESS) was referenced online for the federal status of listed species. Literature referenced prior to conducting the listed species surveys included the Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991), FWCC Bald Eagle location maps, and USFWS and FWCC documented listed species locations. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppo&Hearings \QI2 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 14 in mid 80s. Mostly cloudy, light winds, temperatures in low June 24, 2003 24.0 90s. Mostly sunny, light winds, temperatures in mid June 25, 2003 18.0 90s. Temperatures in upper 70s to lower 80s, winds October 10, 2006 25.5 0 -5 mph, clear, sunny Temperatures in upper 70s to lower 80s, winds October 11, 2006 25.5 0 -5 mph, partly cloud Temperatures in mid to upper 70s, winds 5 -10 October 17, 2006 24.0 mph, clear, sunny Temperatures in mid to upper 70s, winds 0 -5 October 19, 2006 34.0 mph, partly cloud Temperatures in low to mid 70s, winds 5 -10 October 25, 2006 34.0 mph, clear, sunny Temperatures in the mid to upper 80s, winds 5- October 26, 2006 16.0 10 mph, clear, sunny Temperatures in low to mid 70s, winds 0 -5 November 14, 2006 34.0 mph, partly cloudy skies Temperatures from the low 80s to low 90s, August 11, 2009 20.5 winds 0 -5 mph, clear to partly cloudy Temperatures from mid 80s to low 90s, clear August 12, 2009 18.0 and calm early with breeze and patchy, light rain in afternoon Temperatures from the upper 70s to mid 80s, August 13, 2009 10.5 winds 0 -5 mph, partly cloudy Temperatures from low 80s to mid 90s, winds August 18, 2009 18.0 3 -8 mph, partly cloudy, humid Temperatures from low 80s to low 90s, winds August 19, 2009 18.0 0 -5 mph, partly to mostly cloudy Temperatures in the 80s, winds 3 -5 mph, partly August 25, 2009 12.0 cloudy Surveys were conducted for wildlife species listed by the FWCC and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern; and for plant species listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) and USFWS as endangered, threatened, or commercially exploited. The FWCC publication, "Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern; Official Lists" dated 2009 was used as a reference to identify the status of listed species in Florida. The USFWS Threatened and Endangered Species Database System (TESS) was referenced online for the federal status of listed species. Literature referenced prior to conducting the listed species surveys included the Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991), FWCC Bald Eagle location maps, and USFWS and FWCC documented listed species locations. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppo&Hearings \QI2 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 14 The listed species surveys were conducted by qualified ecologists walking parallel belt transects and meandering transects through suitable habitat to ensure that sufficient visual coverage of ground and flora was obtained. At regular intervals, the ecologists stopped, remained quiet, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. Map G -1 shows transect locations and spacings for the listed species surveys conducted in 2002, 2003, and 2006. The survey transects walked for the 2009 updated listed species survey are shown on Map G- 2. Surveys were conducted during daylight hours, typically starting after sunrise and concluding mid - afternoon. At regular intervals, the ecologists stopped, remained quiet, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. Surveys were conducted with the aid of 8x or l Ox power binoculars. The September through November 2002 and June 2003 listed species survey methods were consistent with FWCC guidelines for completing Section 18.1) of the Application for Development Approval (FGFWFC 1988). The 2006 and 2009 survey methods were consistent with the Standardized State - Listed Animal Survey Procedures for Use in the Review of SWFRPC Projects (Beever 2006). Consistency with the survey procedures are summarized below. In addition to the listed species surveys, red - cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (RCW) non - nesting season foraging surveys were conducted October through December of 2003. Nesting season and cavity tree foraging surveys for the RCW were conducted April through May 2004. The surveys were conducted according to the USFWS Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species (SLOPES) for the RCW (USFWS 2002). Two abandoned RCW cavity trees were identified north of Sabal Palm Road in the central portion of the project. One RCW was observed during the non - nesting foraging survey on the northeast portion of the Project site during the 2003 non- nesting season foraging survey. In October through December 2009, an updated RCW non - nesting season foraging survey was conducted. In April through May 2010, an updated RCW nesting season foraging survey was conducted. The updated RCW surveys were conducted according to the USFWS guidelines in the South Florida Survey Protocol (USFWS 2004). No RCWs or cavities in live pine trees were observed during the 2009 -2010 RCW foraging surveys. During the 2009 -2010 RCW surveys, no activity was observed at or around the old cavity trees identified during the 2003 -2004 RCW surveys. One of the old cavity trees was observed to be dead and decaying. A survey for the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) was conducted on the Project site in January 2007 following guidance from the FWCC. No Florida bonneted bats were detected on -site. A scientific literature investigation was performed prior to the listed species survey to determine the geographic range and documented occurrences of listed species. Also, the presence of suitable habitat and consideration of the probability of listed species occurring within the Project area was investigated. The recommended procedures for addressing listed species concerns for the Project were used. Steps one and two were Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support \Hearin9s \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 15 utilized during the listed species survey as outlined in the Standardized State - Listed Animal Survey Procedures for Use in the Review of SWFRPC Projects. Step 1 An accurate map of the habitat types within the Project was prepared (Map F -1). A list of potential listed species for mapped areas was then generated based on the habitat types present (Table 12.0 -1). Table 12.0 -1. List of Potential Listed Species That Could Occur on the Project Site Group Common Name Scientific Name Wading Bird Wood Stork Mycleria americana Florida Sandhill Crane Grus canadensis pratensis Roseate Spoonbill Ajaia ajaja Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea Snowy Egret E retta thula Tri- Colored Heron Egretta tricolor White This Eudocimus albus Limpkin Aramus guarauna Large Raptors Snail Kite Rostrhamus sociabilis Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Aquatic American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Pine Flatwoods Cavity Nesting Red - cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus Mammals Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus ni er shermani Florida Black Bear Ursus americanus oridanus Florida Panther Puma concolor coryi Terrestrial Reptiles and Amphibians Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais cou eri Gopher Frog Rana capito Gopher Tortoise Go herus polyphemus Step 2 The appropriate survey methodology was used for listed species that have been identified to be present or potentially present in the habitats on the Project site. Wading Bird Group Suitable habitats were surveyed for a minimum of five days. Pedestrian and vehicular surveys were used to attain complete coverage. Wading birds species and locations observed were recorded for each day. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12\Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 16 QLarge Raptors Group Ecologists surveyed the site for signs of snail kites, snail kite activity (e.g., piles of apple snail shells, white feces stains at perches), and potential nest sites. Ecologists surveyed for bald eagles throughout the site, particularly in potential habitats within 3,000 feet of open water and open wetlands. Pedestrian transects were conducted to survey for nests. Observations of bald eagles and their flight directions were recorded on the map. During pedestrian transects, ecologists looked for bald eagle nests and potential nesting sites. The locations of existing bald eagle nests and territories were researched prior to conducting the survey. Aquatic Group Pedestrian surveys were conducted along ditches and wetland areas for sightings of American alligators. American alligator nests, droppings, and tracks were also surveyed for the presence of alligators. Pine Flatwoods Cavity Nesting Group Cavity tree and foraging surveys were conducted for the RCW on the Project site. Non - nesting season foraging surveys were conducted between October and December of 2003 and again in 2009. The nesting season foraging survey and cavity tree survey for the RCW were conducted during the months of April and May in 2004. An updated RCW nesting season foraging survey was conducted in April and May 2010. For each survey, pedestrian transects were conducted during the early morning hours for fourteen days. Transects, observation stations, and observed wildlife were recorded on a map. Ecologists surveyed for southeastern American kestrels (Falco sparverius paulus) during the month of August 2009, three to four hours following sunrise. Power line poles were surveyed by vehicular transects at a driving speed of five miles per hour. At regular intervals the vehicle was stopped to listen for vocalizations by southeastern American kestrels. Both sides of the road were surveyed, looking for kestrels perched on power lines and for cavities within the power line poles. Pedestrian transects were conducted where vehicular access was limited. Potential nest sites were looked for. A survey was conducted specifically for the Florida bonneted bat (formerly the Florida mastiff bat) in January 2007. Determination of presence for Florida bonneted bats was based on systematic field surveys conducted by qualified ecologists using an acoustic bat detector. The field survey methodology included an inventory of habitats on the Project site and identification of preferred Florida bonneted bat habitat types. Field surveys were conducted for five nights in January 2007. Surveys were conducted each night beginning at or before sunset. Surveys were not conducted in rain, high winds, or if temperatures dropped below 55 degrees Fahrenheit. Fixed survey stations were established within 300 feet of potential foraging and roost locations. Potential roost locations included buildings and structures. Surveys were conducted for a period of approximately one hour near the building/structure locations to detect roost chatter and calls that may be emitted as bats leave the roost. If little to no bat activity was detected within one hour of sunset at the Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support \Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 17 building/structure location, the observation station was relocated to areas that might provide potential foraging habitat. Mammal Group The locations of documented occurrences of the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) and Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) were researched prior to conducting the survey. Suitable habitats were surveyed by pedestrian transects looking for signs of mammals including tracks, scat, tree scratches, nests and /or den areas. Ecologists surveyed for Big Cypress fox squirrels (Sciurus niger shermani), including potential Big Cypress fox squirrel nests and stripping of tree bark. Direct sightings as well as wildlife sign were recorded on a map. Terrestrial Reptiles and Amphibians Suitable habitats were surveyed by pedestrian transects conducted between early and mid - afternoon. Within potential gopher tortoise habitats and when a gopher tortoise burrow or other sign (i.e., scat) was observed, the transect spacing was narrowed and transects added to ensure coverage of the habitat. C. List all state of federally listed wildlife and plant resources that were observed on the site and show location on Map G. Given the plant communities on -site, list an additional state or federally listed wildlife and plant resources expected to occur on the site and show the location of suitable habitat on Map G. Additionally, address any unique 0 wildlife and plant resources, such as colonial bird nesting sites and migrating bird concentration areas. For species that are either observed or expected to utilize the site, discuss the known or expected location and population size on -site, existence (and extent, if known) of adjacent, contiguous habitat off -site, and any special habitat requirements of the species. Response: Listed Wildlife Species Observed Listed wildlife species identified on the Hacienda Lakes site during the 2002, 2003, 2006, and 2009 listed species surveys, and during the 2003, 2004, and 2009 -2010 RCW surveys, as well as during other on -site fieldwork (i.e., FLUCFCS mapping, wetland flagging, agency site visits) conducted for the Project are listed in Table 12.0 -1. Approximate locations of listed wildlife species observed during the 2002, 2003, and 2006 listed species survey, as well as during other fieldwork conducted between September 2002 and November 2006, are shown on Map G -1. Locations of listed wildlife species observed during the 2009 listed species survey, and other fieldwork conducted on the Project site from August 2009 through December 2009, are shown on Map G -2. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 18 U Table 12.0 -1. Listed Wildlife Species Observed on the Hacienda Lakes Property Common Name Scientific Name Status FWCC USFWS Re tiles American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SSC T(S /A) Gopher Tortoise (burrow) Gopherus polyphemus T -- Birds Snowy Egret Egretta thula SSC -- Little Blue Heron Egretta caerula SSC -- Tit- colored Heron E retta tricolor SSC -- Roseate Spoonbill Ajaia aja'a SSC -- White Ibis Eudocimus albus SSC -- Wood Stork Mycteria americana E E Red - Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis T E Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus -- Mammals Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia T -- Florida Black Bear Ursus americanus floridanus T -- Florida Panther (sign) Puma concolor coryi E E FWCC — Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service E — Endangered T — Threatened T(S /A) — Threatened due to similarity of appearance SSC — Species of Special Concern * Protected under the U.S. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Adult and juvenile American alligators have been observed on the Project site during FLUCFCS mapping and wetland flagging as well as during the 2006 updated listed species survey. Most of the American alligators were observed in association with the ditches located south of Sabal Palm Road in the southwestern portion of the property. One American alligator was observed in a freshwater marsh habitat in the southern portion of the site. A juvenile American alligator was observed on a flooded trail in hydric melaleuca habitat in the central portion of the Project site. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) One inactive gopher tortoise burrow was observed on the Project site during the 2006 Q listed species survey. The gopher tortoise burrow was observed in a palmetto prairie habitat located in the proposed conservation area in the northeast portion of the Project site. During the 2009 listed species survey, two potentially occupied gopher tortoise Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRi ADA Suppoit\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 19 Qburrows were identified in palmetto prairie habitat located north of Sabal Palm Road and just south of the state -owned outparcel. At the time of the survey, both burrows were inundated with water. The gopher tortoise burrow located during the 2006 survey was not observed during the 2009 survey and no other burrows were identified in the northeastern portion of the Project. Snowy Egret (EQretta thula) Snowy egrets have been observed foraging on the Project site in association with the recreational area, low pasture, pine - cypress, and freshwater marsh habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. Little Blue Heron (EQretta caerula) Little blue herons were observed foraging on the Project site in association with low pasture, ditches, cypress, and pine - cypress habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. Tri- Colored Heron (EQretta tricolor) Tri- colored herons have been observed foraging on the Project site in association with low pasture, ditches, cypress, pine - cypress habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. Roseate Spoonbill (Aiaia aiaia) Roseate spoonbills were observed on the Project site in association with ditches pine - cypress habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. White Ibis (Eudocimus albus) White ibis were observed on the Project site in association with the recreational area, low pasture, ditches, cypress, pine - cypress, and freshwater marsh habitats. No nesting sites for this species were observed. Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) Wood storks have been observed on the Project site in association with ditches and various wetland habitats. Potential foraging habitat for the wood stork includes wetlands and other surface water habitats. The Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991) list no bird rookeries on the Project site. According to the USFWS database the nearest documented wood stork rookery that has been recorded as active since 1990 is Rookery No. 619161 located approximately 16 miles northeast of the Project. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) Although the bald eagle is no longer listed as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern by the FWCC or USFWS, it is still protected under the U.S. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. Bald eagles have been observed on -site perched in trees and snags including in the old farm field along the north side of Sabal Palm Road; east of the Willow Run Quarry; and near the Junior Deputy lake. No bald eagle nests have been identified on -site. A review of the FWCC database for bald eagle nests within Collier Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 20 QCounty shows no documented bald eagle nests within a one mile radius of the Project site. The nearest recorded bald eagle nest (CO -015) is located 1.5f miles northeast of the Project boundary in Section 6, Township 50 South, Range 27 East. Bald eagle nest CO- 015 was reported as being active during the 2008 -2009 nesting season. The next closest bald eagle nest (CO -037) is located approximately three miles south of the Project boundary. Nest CO -037 was reported as being active during the 2008 -2009 nesting season. Red - Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Two abandoned RCW cavity trees were identified in 2004 in pine habitats in the eastern portion of the Project site just north of Sabal Palm Road. It was noted that the cavity trees did not have resin wells. One RCW was observed on the northeastern portion of the property during the RCW nesting season foraging survey in May 2004. During the 2009- 2010 RCW foraging surveys, no evidence of activity by RCWs at the two abandoned cavity trees was observed. One of the previously identified cavity trees was observed to be dead and decaying. No RCWs or cavities in live pine trees were observed during the 2009 -2010 nesting and non - nesting season RCW survey. Big Cypress Fox Sguirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) Big cypress fox squirrels have been observed on -site in association with hydric melaleuca, pine - cypress, and pine habitats, as well as in pine trees in the abandoned farm field on the north side of Sabal Palm Road. Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) Florida black bear tracks, scat, and scratch marks on trees have been identified on -site. One Florida black bear was observed on the Project site south of Sabal Palm Road in November 2009 during the RCW non - nesting season foraging survey. Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi) The Project site is located within the Primary Zone of the USFWS Panther Focus Area (Kautz et al. 2006). Telemetry points from radio - collared panthers have been recorded by FWCC on the Project site. The panther telemetry points recorded on -site within the past five years (from August 2004 to August 2009) are from Florida Panther Nos. 146, 147, 148, and 156. Most of the telemetry locations are south of Sabal Palm Road. The telemetry points north of Sabal Palm Road are scattered throughout the central and eastern portions of the Project. During fieldwork in 2009, Florida panther sign was documented on -site. Florida panther tracks were identified on Sabal Palm Road leading south onto the Project site; on a dirt trail on the east side of the Project site (east of the Sports Park); on a trail east of Willow Run Quarry; and south of the citrus grove located on Sabal Palm Road. A Florida panther scrape /scratch was identified on a trail in pine - cypress habitat about one -half mile south of Sabal Palm Road. Other Listed Wildlife Species That Could Potentially Occur On The Site Q Listed wildlife species that were not observed but which have the potential to occur on the Project site are listed in Table 12.0 -2. Information used in assessing the potential Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 21 ® occurrence of these species included Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida Volume I. Mammals (Humphrey 1992), Volume III. Amphibians and Reptiles (Moler 1992), and Volume V. Birds (Rodgers et al. 1996); and personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Table 12.0 -2. Listed Wildlife That Could Potentially Occur on the Hacienda Lakes Property [A FWCC — Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service E — Endangered T — Threatened SSC — Species of Special Concern Gopher Frog (Rana areolata) The gopher frog could potentially occur within upland Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 4119) habitat on the Project site; however, it is typically only found in association with populations of gopher tortoise. Gopher tortoise habitat on -site is limited. Preferred breeding habitat for the gopher frog includes seasonally flooded grassy ponds and cypress ponds that lack fish populations (Moler 1992). No gopher frogs were documented on -site. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 22 Des' nated Status Potential Locations Common Name Scientific Name (FLUCFCS Code) FWCC USFWS Am hibians and Re tiles 211/260/3219/ Gopher Frog Rana capito SSC - 4119/4279 Eastern Indigo Drymarchon corais T T 260/3219/4119/ Snake couperi 4269/42794289/ Eastern Indigo 42891/4349/6219 / Snake D marchon corais T T 4249/6259/6309/ (Continued) cou era p 6419/743/832 Birds Lim kin Aramus guarauna SSC - 514/6419/742 Southeastern Falco sparverius T _ 4119/4159/6259 American Kestrel paulus Florida Sandhill Grus canadensis T - 211/260/262/3219 / Crane pratensis 6419/740/7401 Burrowing Owl Athene cunicularia SSC - 211/260 floridana Mammals 4119/4289/4349/525 / Florida Bonneted Eumops floridanus E - 530/6249/6259/6289 / Bat 6419 FWCC — Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service E — Endangered T — Threatened SSC — Species of Special Concern Gopher Frog (Rana areolata) The gopher frog could potentially occur within upland Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 4119) habitat on the Project site; however, it is typically only found in association with populations of gopher tortoise. Gopher tortoise habitat on -site is limited. Preferred breeding habitat for the gopher frog includes seasonally flooded grassy ponds and cypress ponds that lack fish populations (Moler 1992). No gopher frogs were documented on -site. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 22 Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) The Eastern indigo snake could potentially occur within the native upland and wetland habitats on the Project site. The Eastern indigo snake is far ranging and may utilize activity areas of 125 to 250 acres or more (Moler 1992). The Eastern indigo snake is typically found in association with populations of gopher tortoise. Gopher tortoise habitat is limited and no eastern indigo snakes were found on -site. Limpkin (Aramus guarauna) Potential foraging habitat for limpkin includes Ditches. The Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991) list no bird rookeries on the Project site. The nearest recorded site is No. 620022 located approximately 8.5 miles south of the Project in East Marco Bay near Marco Island in Section 9, Township 52 South, Range 26 East. This colony was last reported occupied by brown pelicans in 1989. No limpkins were found on -site. Southeastern American Kestrel (Falco sparverius Paulus) Potential habitat for Southeastern American kestrel may exist within the pine habitats on the Project site (FLUCFCS Codes 4119, 4159, and 6259); however, the Project site is at the southernmost extreme of the known range for this subspecies. Since 1980, observations of Southeastern American kestrel in Florida have occurred primarily in sandhill or sandpine scrub areas of north and central Florida (Rodgers et al. 1996). No Southeastern American kestrels were found on -site. Florida Sandhill Crane (Gnus canadensis pratensis) Potential foraging habitat for Florida sandhill crane may exist within the Disturbed Land (FLUCFCS Code 740); Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212); Open Rural Land (FLUCFCS Code 260) Low Pasture, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 262); and Freshwater Marshes, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6419) on the Project. Preferred sandhill crane habitat, such as prairies and shallow marshes dominated by pickerelweed and maidencane, are limited on the Project site. No Florida sandhill cranes were observed on -site. Burrowiny, Owl (Athene cunicularia floridana) Potential burrowing owl habitat exists along the berms in the Pasture (FLUCFCS Code 212) and Rural Open Land (FLUCFCS Code 260) habitat on the Project site. No burrowing owls were observed on -site. Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) formerly known as the Florida mastiff bat (Eumops glaucinus floridanus) Florida bonneted bats could potentially roost and/or forage within the upland and wetland habitats on the Project site. The Florida bonneted bat is known to occur in cities and forested areas on both the east and west coasts of south Florida from Charlotte County to Palm Beach County (Marks and Marks 2006, Humphrey 1992). A Florida bonneted bat survey was conducted on the Project site using the Anabat sonar and software equipment and survey guidelines recommended by Cynthia and George Marks. No Florida bonneted bats were documented on -site. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (dean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 23 QListed Plant Species Observed Four listed plant species were observed on the Project site. Listed plant species identified on -site and the habitat types (i.e. FLUCFCS Codes) in which they were found are listed in Table 12.0 -3. Table 12.0 -3. Listed Plant Species Observed on the Hacienda Lakes Property FDACS — Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service C — Commercially Exploited E — Endangered Other Listed Plant Species that Could Potentially Occur On the Site Listed plant species that were not observed but which have the potential to occur on the Project site are listed in Table 12.0 -4. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Table 12.0 -4. Listed Plant Species That Could Potentially Occur on the Hacienda Lakes Property Desi nated Status Habitat Common Name Scientific Name (FLUCFCS FDACS USFWS FDACS Code) Butterfly Orchid Encyclia tampensis C - 6249 Stiff - Leaved Wild Tillandsia fasciculata E - 6219/6249/ 6259/6289 Pine Campyloneurum E _ 6219 hyllitidus 6219/6249/ Giant Airplant Tillandsia utriculata E - 6259/6289 Cowhorn Orchid Cyrtopodium E _ 6249 Catesby's lily unctatum T - 6259 FDACS — Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service C — Commercially Exploited E — Endangered Other Listed Plant Species that Could Potentially Occur On the Site Listed plant species that were not observed but which have the potential to occur on the Project site are listed in Table 12.0 -4. Information used in assessing the potential occurrence of these species included personal experience and knowledge of the geographic region. Table 12.0 -4. Listed Plant Species That Could Potentially Occur on the Hacienda Lakes Property Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 24 Desi nated Status Potential Common Name Scientific Name Location (FLUCFCS FDACS USFWS Code) Bird's nest spleenwort; Asplenium serratum E - 4281 wild birdnest fern Long strap fern Campyloneurum E _ 6219 hyllitidus White - squirrel- banana; Deeringothamnus E E 4119 beautiful pawpaw pulchellus Catesby's lily Lilium catesbaei T - 6259 Hand adder's tongue Ophioglossum E - 4289 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 24 X fern palmatum Inflated wild pine Tillandsia balbisiana T - 4289 Florida coontie Zamia floridana C - 4119 Simpson's zephyr lily Zephyranthes simpsonii T _ 6259 FDACS — Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services USFWS — U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service C — Commercially Exploited E — Endangered T — Threatened D. Indicate what impact development of the site will pose to affected state or federally listed wildlife and plant resources. Response: The site plan has been designed to minimize impacts to the listed species that have been identified on the property. The site plan minimizes impacts to the higher quality wetland and upland habitat on the eastern portion of the site. The on -site preserves have been designed to connect to off -site preserves and the Picayune Strand State Forest in order to retain connectivity of wildlife habitat. Development is proposed to occur mostly within habitats on the western and central portions of the site which consist of high percentages of exotics and lack high natural resource value. E. Discuss what measures are proposed to be taken to mitigate impacts to state and federally listed wildlife and plant resources. If protection is proposed to occur on -site, describe what legal instrument will be used to protect the site, and what management actions will be taken to maintain habitat value. If protection is proposed to occur off -site, identify the proposed amount and type of lands to be mitigated as well as whether mitigation would be through a regional mitigation land bank, by acquisition of lands that adjoin existing public holdings, or by other means Response: As discussed above, the Project's minimization of impacts to listed species includes the preservation and enhancement of wetland and upland habitats on the property. The site plan design preserves the higher quality wetlands located on the eastern portion of the site. Additional mitigation lands were purchased and added to the Project's boundary to offset environmental impacts. These additional lands include approximately 260 acres south of Sabal Palm Road. On -site preserves were designed to retain connectivity to the Picayune Strand State Forest to the east and to compliment the permitted conservation area along Willow Run Quarry's eastern boundary. The wetland mitigation plan for the Project includes the enhancement and preservation of 1,281± acres of on -site wetlands, and 260± acres of on -site uplands. In addition, approximately 3 acres of SFWMD "Other Surface Waters" (OSW) will be enhanced and preserved. These 1,544± acres will be placed in a conservation easement or other equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the SFWMD. It is anticipated that the majority of the preserves will be deeded to the state to compliment the Picayune Strand State Forest. In addition to the 1,544± acres to be placed in conservation easement, the Project design Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 25 Qpreserves approximately 31 acres of wetlands, 9 acres of uplands, and 5 acres of OSWs located within existing easements on the Project site. These 46f acres will not be used as mitigation or placed under conservation easement; however exotic vegetation will be removed from the habitats. Enhancement of the wetland and upland preserves will include the hand removal of exotic and nuisance vegetation such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and cattails. The surface water management system will be designed to maintain appropriate wetland hydroperiods within the enhancement areas. The wetland hydroperiods will be maintained to provide for the natural wet and dry cycles, which provides for foraging for wading birds. The wetland and upland preserves will be placed in a conservation easement or other equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the SFWMD. It is anticipated that portions of the preserves will be deeded to the state to compliment the Picayune Strand State Forest. REFERENCES Beever, James W. 2006. Standardized State - Listed Animal Survey Procedures for Use in the Review of SWRPC Projects. First Edition. Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550- 010- 001 -a. Third Edition. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2009. Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species, and Species of Special Concern; Official Lists. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. 1988. Wildlife Survey Methodology Guidelines for Section 18.D of the Application for Development Approval. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, Office of Environmental Services. Humphrey, S.R. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume 1. Mammals. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 118 -133. Marks, Cynthia S. and Marks, George E. 2006. Bats of Florida. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Moler, P.E. 1992. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume I11. Amphibians and Reptiles. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP,0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Supporl\Hearings\Q12 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (cleau).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q12 Pg. 26 C01 Rodgers, J.A, H.W. Kale, and H.T. Smith. 1996. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. Volume V. Birds. University Press of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Runde, D.E., J.A., Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies, Update 1986 -1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2002. Standard Local Operating Procedures for Endangered Species, Red - Cockaded Woodpeckers. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Revised Recovery Plan for the Red - cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis). 2nd revision. Atlanta, Georgia. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Red - Cockaded Woodpecker South Florida Survey Protocol (adapted from Service 2003). Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppor learings \Ql2 \Question 12 Vegetation and Wildlife (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 12 Pg. 27 QUESTION 13 — WETLANDS See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (8); POLICY (6) GOAL (10); POLICIES (1), (7), (8) GOAL (16); POLICY (2) A. If there are wetlands on the site, discuss and specify the following: 1. Acreage and percentage of property which is currently wetlands. These wetlands should be shown on Map F, Vegetation Associations and identified by individual reference numbers. Response: As part of the 2003 application for an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) for the project, wetland lines were flagged and survey located. This ERP application was withdrawn in March 2008. In August 2009, Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI) conducted fieldwork to update the FLUCFCS map for the Hacienda Lakes DRI to reflect current conditions due to wildfires that occurred over the past several years and the spread of invasive exotic plant species, especially melaleuca ( Melaleuca quinquenervia). The wetland limits on the Project were re- flagged in the field and survey located in August through December Q2009. The 2009 surveyed wetland lines are shown on the Aerial with FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map (Map F) and on the Wetlands Map (Map F -2). The wetland lines are pending verification and approval by the South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) as part of an updated ERP application for the Project. The updated ERP application was submitted to the SFWMD on January 26, 2010 and will be processed concurrently with the DRI application. Table 13.A -1 lists the acreage for each wetland and Other Surface Water (OSW) on the Project site. L` Table 13.A -1. SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetland and OSW Acreages SFWMD Wetland/ OSW No. Acreage Wetland Acreage OSW Acreage 1 24.14 - 2 13.06 - 3 29.89 - 4 1.01 - 5 0.85 - 6 2.65 - 7 1.14 - g 64.94 - 9 0.19 - 10 2.65 - Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP\0003 DRI- ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q 13 Pg. 1 11 2.68 - 12 0.40 - 13 2.10 - 14 0.27 - 15 1.46 - 16 16.86 - 17 0.12 - 18 0.02 - 19 794.68 - 20 127.27 - 21 5.43 - 22 5.43 - 23 1.16 - 24 166.89 - 25 35.41 - 26 0.20 - 27 0.51 - 28 0.04 - 29 451.27 - 1 _ 2.13 2 _ 0.45 3 _ 1.17 4 _ 0.07 5 _ 5.09 6 _ 1.50 7 _ 0.95 8 _ 2.89 9 _ 0.22 10 - 0.62 11 - 2.76 Totals 1,752.72 17.85 The vegetation associations found within each of the wetlands and OSWs are listed in Table 13.A -2 and identified on Map F and Map F -1. Qi,2005,050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP 0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support' Hearings Q13 Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q 13 Pg. 2 �401 Table 13.A -2. SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetland and OSW Acreages by FLUCFCS Type SFWMD Wetland FLUCFCS FLUCFCS Description FLUCFCS Wetland Total No. Code Acreage Acres 1 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric 0.26 24.14 6249 E1 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 1.98 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6249 E3 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 0.58 (50 - 75% Exotics) 2 6249 E4 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 3.75 13.06 (76 - 100% Exotics) 6259 E3 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 3.71 (50 - 75% Exotics) 6259 E4 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 3.04 (76 - 100% Exotics) 6249 E2 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 20.90 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6249 E3 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 1.71 (50 - 75% Exotics) 3 6249 E4 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 6.63 29.89 (76 - 100% Exotics) 6259 E3 Hydri c Pine, Disturbed 0.47 (50 - 75% Exotics) 6259 E4 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 0.18 (76 - 100% Exotics) 4 6249 E3 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 1.01 1.01 (50 - 75% Exotics) 5 6259 E3 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 0.85 0.85 (50 - 75% Exotics) 6249 E2 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 1.32 (25 - 49% Exotics) 2.65 6 6249 E3 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 1.33 (50 - 75% Exotics) Q: 2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI. ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q 13 Pg. 3 ❑+r Table 13.A -2. (Continued) SFWMD Wetland FLUCFCS FLUCFCS Description FLUCFCS Wetland Total No. Code Acreage Acres 7 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric 1.14 1.14 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed 3.50 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed 1.87 (25 - 49% Exotics) Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 18.52 6249 E1 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6249 E2 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 24.19 (25 - 49% Exotics) Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 6.03 8 6249 E3 (50 - 75% Exotics) 64.94 Hydric Cabbage Palm, 6289 E3 Disturbed 2.08 (50 - 75% Exotics) Freshwater Marsh, 6419 E1 Disturbed 4.13 (0 - 24% Exotics) Freshwater Marsh, 6419 E2 Disturbed 4.62 (25 - 49% Exotics) 9 6249 E2 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 0.19 0.19 (25 - 49% Exotics) Freshwater Marsh, 6419 E1 Disturbed 1.03 (0 - 24% Exotics) 2.65 10 Freshwater Marsh, 6419 E2 Disturbed 1.62 (25 - 49% Exotics) Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 1.87 6249 E2 (25 - 49% Exotics) 11 Freshwater Marsh, 2.68 6419 E1 Disturbed 0.81 (0 - 24946 Exotics) 12 6249 E2 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 0.40 0.40 (25 - 49% Exotics) Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 0.20 6249 E2 (25 - 49% Exotics) 13 Hydric Cabbage Palm, 2.10 6289 E1 Disturbed 1.40 (0 - 24% Exotics) Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DR] -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support \Hearings \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q13 Pg. 4 Table 13.A -2. (Continued) SFWMD Wetland FLUCFCS FLUCFCS Description FLUCFCS Wetland Total No. Code Acreage Acres Wetland Shrub, 13 6319 E3 Disturbed 0.50 (Continued) (50 - 750,/,o Exotics) 14 6259 E1 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 0.27 0.27 (0 - 240 Exotics) 15 6249 E2 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 1.46 1.46 (25 - 49% Exotics) 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric 5.84 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 4.70 16 6249 E3 (50 - 75% Exotics) 16.86 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 6.32 6249 E4 (76 - 100% Exotics) 17 6249 E3 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 0.12 0.12 (50 - 75% Exotics) 18 6249 E3 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 0.02 0.02 (50 - 75% Exotics) 262 Low Pasture, Hydric 54.43 4221 Brazilian Pepper, Hydric 0.18 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric 272.11 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed 9.10 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed 4.16 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6249 E1 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 122.53 (0 - 240 Exotics) 6249 E2 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 146.14 (25 - 49% Exotics) 19 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 88.06 794.68 6249 E3 (50 - 75% Exotics) 6249 E4 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 8.34 (76 - 100% Exotics) 624B E2 Pine /Cypress, Burned 22.90 (25 - 49% Exotics) 624B E3 Pine /Cypress, Burned 9.57 (50 - 75% Exotics) 6259 E2 Hydri c Pine, Disturbed 0.96 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6259 E3 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 10.53 (50 - 75% Exotics) Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- E"\0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA SupporrHearings \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q13 Pg. 5 A Table 13.A -2. (Continued) SFWMD Wetland FLUCFCS FLUCFCS Description FLUCFCS Wetland Total No. Code Acreage Acres Hydric Pine, Disturbed 8.78 6259 E4 (76 - 100% Exotics) 625B E3 Hydric Pine, Burned 1.22 (50 - 75% Exotics) Hydric Cabbage Palm, 6289 E1 Disturbed 0.33 (0 - 24% Exotics) Wetland Forested Mixed, 6309 E1 Disturbed 5.27 19 (0 -24% Exotics) (Continued) Wetland Forested Mixed, 6309 E2 Disturbed 7.21 (25 -49% Exotics) Wetland Shrub, 6319 E3 Disturbed 5.33 (50 - 75% Exotics) Freshwater Marsh, 6419 E2 Disturbed 0.88 (25 — 49% Exotics) 7401 Disturbed Land, Hydric 16.65 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric 21.21 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed 19.79 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed 4.56 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6249 E1 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 10.34 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6249 E2 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 1 28.08 20 (25 - 49% Exotics) 127.27 6249 E3 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 15.09 (50 - 75% Exotics) 6259E 1 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 1.47 (0 - 2491% Exotics) 6259 E2 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 8.11 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6259 E3 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 18.62 (50 - 75% Exotics) Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands 3/4/2011 ADA Q 13 Pg. 6 Table 13.A -2. (Continued) SFWMD Wetland FLUCFCS FLUCFCS Description FLUCFCS Wetland Total No. Code Acreage Acres Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 2.98 6249 E 1 (0 - 24% Exotics) 5.43 21 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 2.45 6249 E2 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6259 E2 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 3.79 (25 - 49% Exotics) 5.43 22 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 1.64 6259 E3 (50 - 75% Exotics) 23 6259 E3 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 1.16 1.16 (50 - 75% Exotics) 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric 42.42 6189 El Willow, Disturbed 0.80 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed 8.41 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed 3.00 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6219 E3 Cypress, Disturbed 1.45 (50 - 75% Exotics) 24 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 11.59 166.89 6249 E1 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6249 E2 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 30.39 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6249 E3 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 65.88 (50 - 75% Exotics) Hydri c Pine, Disturbed 1.75 6259 E1 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6259 E2 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 1.20 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6219 E1 Cypress, Disturbed 1.13 (0 - 24% Exotics) 25 6249 E2 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 2.26 35.41 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6249 E3 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 32.02 (50 - 75% Exotics) 26 6249 E3 Pine / Cypress, Disturbed 0.20 0.20 (50 — 75% Exotics) 27 6259 E3 Hydric Fine, Visturma I 0.51 0.51 10 1 (50 — 75% Exotics) Q:\2005\050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD•DRI- ERP,0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q13 Pg. 7 L401 �49] Table 13.A -2. (Continued) SFWMD Wetland FLUCFCS FLUCFCS Description FLUCFCS Wetland Total No. Code Acreage Acres 28 7401 Disturbed Land, Hydric 0.04 0.04 4221 Brazilian Pepper, Hydric 1.63 4241 Melaleuca, Hydric 2.10 6189 E1 Willow, Disturbed 10.17 (0 - 240 Exotics) 6189 E2 Willow, Disturbed 2.48 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6219 E 1 Cypress, Disturbed 115.84 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6219 E2 Cypress, Disturbed 14.06 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6249 E 1 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 121.22 (0 - 24% Exotics) 6249 E2 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 58.02 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6249 E3 Pine /Cypress, Disturbed 37.30 (50 - 75% Exotics) 6259 El Hydric Pine, Disturbed 28.03 (0 - 24% Exotics) 29 6259 E2 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 7.70 451.27 (25 - 49% Exotics) 6259 E3 Hydric Pine, Disturbed 24.42 (50 - 75% Exotics) Hydric Cabbage Palm, 6289 E1 Disturbed 0.91 (0 — 249/o Exotics) Hydric Cabbage Palm, 6289 E2 Disturbed 6.94 (25 — 49% Exotics) Wetland Forested Mixed, 6309 El Disturbed 14.62 (0 — 24% Exotics) Freshwater Marsh, 6419 E1 Disturbed 0.85 (0 - 24% Exotics) Freshwater Marsh, 6419 E2 Disturbed 3.50 (25 - 49% Exotics) 7401 Disturbed Land, Hydric 1.48 Wetlands Sub -Total 1,752.72 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearin9s \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q13 Pg. 8 Table 13.A -2. (Continued) SFWMD OSW FLUCFCS FLUCFCS Description FLUCFCS OSW Total Code Acreage Acres No. 8301 Utilities, Hydric 1.10 1 Powerline Easement, 1.03 2.13 8321 Hydric 8301 Utilities, Hydric 0.24 2 Powerline Easement, 0.21 0.45 8321 H dric 3 8321 Powerline Easement, 1.17 1.17 Hydric 4 742 Borrow Area 0.07 0.07 5 742 Borrow Area 5.09 5.09 6 8301 Utilities, Hydric 1.50 1.50 8301 Utilities, Hydric 0.03 7 Powerline Easement, 0.92 0.95 8321 Hydric 8301 Utilities, Hydric 1.95 g Powerline Easement, 0.94 2.89 8321 Hydric 9 742 Borrow Area 0.22 0.22 10 514 Ditch 0.62 0.62 11 514 Ditch 2.76 2.76 OSW Sub -Total 17.85 Wetlands and OSW Total 1,770.57 2. Historic hydroperiods and seasonal water elevations of on -site wetlands. Response: The construction of County Road 951 and the Henderson Creek Canal has altered historic surface water flows in the area. In addition, the construction of surrounding development such as Willow Run Quarry and the construction of Sabal Palm Road has further altered the historic hydrologic regime of the area. The results of these activities have led to the reduction in the depth and duration of wetland water levels on the western portion of the project site. This effect is most notable in wetlands located closer to the Henderson Creek Canal. The resulting effect of these lowered water elevations has been the infestation of the wetlands by exotic invasive plant species such as melaleuca. Melaleuca infestation is correspondingly higher on the western half of the property as a result of the drainage effects of the canal. Melaleuca infestation lessens as you move further to the east from the canal. Based on biological indicators of wetland water levels, the seasonal high water elevations on the property range from 8.5 to 10.0 feet National Geodetic Vertical QDatum (NGVD). Near Collier Boulevard on the west side of the property and in the central portion of the site, the seasonal high water elevations are generally 9.5 to 10.0 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERM003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q13\Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q 13 Pg. 9 Qfeet NGVD with ground elevations averaging 9.5 feet NGVD. The biological indicators on the east portion of the project site, just north of Sabal Palm Road, indicate a seasonal high water elevation between 8.5 to 9.0 feet NGVD with ground elevations averaging between 8.0 and 8.5 feet NGVD. South of Sabal Palm Road the seasonal high water elevations drop to a range of 8.5 to 9.0 feet NGVD with ground elevations averaging 8.0 feet NGVD. 3. Acreage and location of wetlands which are to be preserved in their natural or existing state, including proposed hydroperiods, seasonal water elevations and methods for preservation. Response: Approximately 73 percent (1,281± acres) of the wetlands on -site will be preserved, enhanced, and placed in a conservation easement. In general, the wetlands on -site have a high degree of infestation by melaleuca on the western and central portions of the property. The melaleuca infestation generally decreases towards the eastern portion of the site. The site plan was designed to preserve the higher quality wetlands on the east side of the Project. This retains connectivity of the on -site wetland preserves to the off -site wetlands of the Picayune Strand State Forest. The wetlands and uplands in the northeast portion of the site, adjacent to the Willow Run Quarry Conservation Area and the Picayune Strand State Forest, will be enhanced and preserved. The land adjacent to the state -owned out parcel in the central portion of the Project site will be enhanced and preserved to retain connectivity of the wetlands and uplands of the state -owned lands to the Picayune Strand State Forest. The on -site wetlands and uplands south of Sabal Palm Road will be enhanced and preserved. Seasonal water elevations for the preserved wetlands will be maintained by routing surface water flows from the proposed development areas through stormwater management facilities into the wetlands. One technique used to determine the control elevations for the stormwater management system was established based on the elevations of the biological indicators of wetland water levels. These indicators were compared with data collected from on -site water level monitoring wells. These design features will maintain surface water levels within the preserved wetlands. The 1,281± acres of wetland preserves and 260± acres of upland preserves will be placed in a conservation easement or other equivalent deed restriction with inspection, enforcement, and approval rights granted to the SFWMD. In addition, 46± acres (31± acres of wetlands, 9± acres of uplands, and 5± acres of OSWs), located within existing easements on the Project site, will be preserved. These 46± acres will not be used as mitigation or placed under conservation easement; however exotic vegetation will be removed from the habitats. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI•ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Heacings \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q13 Pg. 10 4. Acreage and location of areas to be enhanced, including proposed hydroperiods, seasonal water elevations and methods of enhancement. Response: As described above, approximately 73 percent (1,281± acres) of the wetlands on -site will be preserved, enhanced, and placed in a conservation easement. An additional 31± acres of wetlands on -site, within existing easements, will also be preserved and exotic vegetation removed. See response to A.3 above regarding proposed seasonal water elevations and wetlands to be preserved and enhanced. Wetland enhancement will include removal of exotic vegetation and maintaining seasonal wetland water elevations. Exotic vegetation to be removed includes, but is not limited to, melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and downy rose -myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosus). Exotic vegetation removal will be done by hand removal. In general, the exotics will be treated in place with an appropriate herbicide and left standing, or exotics will be cut, the cut vegetation removed or stacked in place, and the remaining stump treated with an appropriate herbicide. Supplemental plantings will be installed in areas of greater than 50 percent exotic coverage. 5. Actions taken to minimize or mitigate impacts on wetland areas, including maintaining the hydroperiod and providing buffers. Response: The site plan has been designed to avoid and minimize impacts to the wetlands on -site. The wetland mitigation plan for the Project includes the enhancement and preservation of 1,281± acres of on -site wetlands and 260± acres of on -site uplands. In addition, 3f acres of SFWMD OSWs will be enhanced and preserved. Where a minimum 15 foot upland buffer adjacent to wetland preserves is not feasible, structural buffers will be provided. In addition, mitigation lands were purchased to offset environmental impacts. These additional lands include approximately 260 acres south of Sabal Palm Road. See response to A.3 regarding proposed maintenance of seasonal water elevations. 6. Acreage and location of wetlands which will be disturbed or altered, including a discussion of the specific alterations and disturbances. Response: The Project will result in unavoidable wetland impacts to approximately 440 acres of wetlands. The majority of the wetland impacts occur to the low quality, melaleuca infested wetlands on the western portion of the site. The hydrology of the wetlands on the western portion of the site has been altered due to the construction of CR 951 and the Henderson Creek Canal. In general, the wetlands on the western portion of the Project site have a high degree of infestation by melaleuca. The melaleuca infestation generally decreases towards the eastern portion of the site. Melaleuca has spread across the site due in part to widespread wildfires in areas of the Project site that already had a high percentage of melaleuca. The majority of the wetlands to be impacted consist of habitats negatively affected by alterations of Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q 13 Pg. 11 hydrology due to the Henderson Creek Canal, the infestation of the exotic species melaleuca, and recent catastrophic wildfires. 7. Precautions to be taken during construction to protect wetland areas. Response: Prior to commencement of construction, the limits of wetland preserves will be staked and roped to prevent encroachment by construction activities. In addition, best management practices for erosion control will be implemented during construction of the project. Prior to commencement of construction, erosion control devices will be installed where appropriate to control and reduce soil erosion, sediment transport, and turbidity. Such devices, which include haybale barriers, silt fencing, sediment booms, and temporary sediment traps, will remain in place throughout the duration of construction until construction zones and surrounding areas are stabilized. 8. If available, provide jurisdictional determinations Response: A formal binding jurisdictional determination has been requested as part of the ERP application for Hacienda Lakes (Application No. 100126 -5). The wetland lines were flagged in the field and survey located in August through December of 2009. During processing of the ERP application, the wetland lines will be verified by SFWMD staff. A portion of the Project site, where the Florida Sports Park is currently located, was permitted by SFWMD in April 1986 ( SFWMD Permit No. 11- 00348 -P). The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a jurisdictional determination on March 16, 2006 for the Project site (Jurisdictional Determination No. SAJ- 2003 - 11158), which is valid for five years. B. Provide any proposed plans (conceptual or specific) for created or enhanced wetland areas, including littoral lake slopes, buffers, vegetative species to be planted, etc. Response: The site plan has been designed to minimize impacts to the higher quality wetland and upland habitats on the eastern portion of the site. The on -site preserves have been designed to connect to off -site preserves and the Picayune Strand State Forest in order to retain connectivity of wetlands and wildlife habitat. The on -site wetland preserves will be enhanced through exotic removal and supplemental plantings, which will result in preserves that are more suitable as foraging habitats for the listed wading birds observed on- site, as well as providing potential roosting areas. Where feasible, the site plan has been designed to buffer preserves on the property by locating lower intensity land uses, such as lakes, adjacent to the preserves. The lakes will buffer the preserves from the residential development. Where a minimum 15± foot upland buffer adjacent to wetland preserves is not feasible, structural buffers will be provided. Also, the lakes will provide open water that will provide additional wildlife habitat adjacent to the preserves. Emergent wetland acres will be increased through the planting of littoral zones in the lakes created as part of the 10 development. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD -DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q13 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q13 Pg. 12 EV Enhancement of the wetland and upland preserves will include the removal of exotic vegetation such as melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and downy rose myrtle. Exotic vegetation removal will be done by hand removal. In general, the exotics will be treated in place with an appropriate herbicide and left standing, or exotics will be cut, the cut vegetation removed or stacked in place, and the remaining stump treated with an appropriate herbicide. Supplemental plantings of native vegetation will be installed in areas of greater than 50 percent exotic coverage. In addition, as part of the mitigation plan, areas of degraded wetlands, including monocultures of melaleuca, will be enhanced through the mechanical removal of exotics, grading to wetland elevations, and planting with native vegetation. The grading plan for these areas includes the establishment of marshes for wading bird foraging habitat. These marshes will be graded to varying depths to allow the concentration of prey for wading birds at alternating times of the year as water levels seasonally rise and recede. The surface water management system will be designed to maintain appropriate wetland hydroperiods within the enhancement areas. The wetland hydroperiods will be maintained to provide for the natural wet and dry cycles, which provides foraging for wading birds. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Ql3 \Question 13 Wetlands (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q13 Pg. 13 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 14 WATER DAA CON Planning Visualization 1 \St �t vL�, S—Y g g QUESTION 14 — WATER See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (6); POLICY (19) GOAL (8); POLICIES (2), (4), (6), (7), (8), (10), (12) GOAL (10); POLICY (1), (8) GOAL (16); POLICY (6) GOAL (22); POLICY (3) A. Describe the existing hydrologic conditions (both ground and surface water) on and abutting the site, including identification and discussion of any potential aquifer recharge areas. Please identify and describe any Outstanding Florida Waters, Wild and Scenic Rivers, Florida Aquatic Preserves or Florida Class I or II Waters that occur within, abutting or downstream of the site. Response: GEOLOGIC SETTING In order to understand the hydrologic conditions on and abutting the Hacienda Lakes site, it is important to have an understanding of the regional geologic setting as well as of the local geologic conditions in the immediate vicinity of the project site. The Hacienda Lakes site is located in west - central Collier County in an area underlain by about 18,500 feet of sedimentary rocks which range in age from Jurassic to Holocene. A generalized stratigraphic column for Collier County for the upper 500 feet of the geologic section is provided as Figure 14 -1. This section is characterized by a suite of sands, clays, sandstones, limestones, and dolostones that tend to be laterally variable in thickness as well as in porosity and permeability. Data from wells drilled in the area allow for fairly accurate prediction of the specific geologic or hydrologic conditions at any particular location or depth in this area of Collier County. Lithologic and hydrologic subdivisions are discussed in greater detail below. Initial interpretations of the site - specific geology, hydrology, and water quality were made through ENTRIX's in -house database, as well as from well data available from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), the Florida Geological Survey (FGS), and the United States Geological Survey (USGS). These data are supplemented by the installation of seven test wells at the Hacienda Lakes site. A geologic cross - section of the project site is provided as Figure 14 -2. A map showing the line of cross - section is provided as Figure 14 -3. A lithologic log for one of the on -site test wells is provided as Table 14 -1. The lithostratigraphic units pertinent to and recognized for this project include: the undifferentiated Holocene and Pleistocene -age sediments, the Pliocene -age Tamiami Formation, and the Miocene -age Hawthorn Group. The Tamiami formation in this area is subdivided into three members. These are, with increasing depth, the Pinecrest Limestone, the Bonita Springs Marl, and the Ochopee Limestone. The Hawthorn Group is subdivided into two formations. These are, with increasing depth, the Peace River Formation and the Arcadia Formation. The above lithostratigraphic terminology is that used by the South Florida Water Management Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Q14\Question 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 14 Pg. 1 District (Knapp et al, 1986; Water Resource Solutions, 2003) and the Florida Geological Survey (McCoy, 1972). Undifferentiated Holocene and Pleistocene Sediments Much of Florida is covered by a blanket of Pleistocene to Holocene undifferentiated siliclastic (i.e. quartz sand) sediments. This is also the case at the Hacienda Lakes project site where the upper five to six feet consists primarily of unconsolidated sand. These sands tend to be very fine to medium grained and subangular to subrounded. They are generally interpreted to have been deposited as beach ridges or dunes to shallow marine terraces. It is unlikely that the oldest of these sediments at the Hacienda Lakes site is older than Pleistocene in age, but the absence of biostratigraphically diagnostic fossils precludes an accurate age assignment. These sediments are referred to herein as the undifferentiated Holocene - Pleistocene sediments. Tamiami Formation At the Hacienda Lakes site, the recognized subdivisions of the Tamiami Formation, include, in descending order: the Pinecrest Limestone member, the Bonita Springs Marl member, and the Ochopee Limestone Member. The top of the Tamiami Formation in Collier County is an unconformity which represents a period of erosion prior to deposition of the overlying Pleistocene and Holocene sediments. The effect of this erosional unconformity is that the upper two members of the Tamiami formation may be absent or the upper member may be absent and the Bonita Springs Marl may be relatively thin. The presence or absence of the two upper members of the formation significant for recharge of aquifers and the development of water resources at the site. The water resources of the site are described in more detail below. Water resource development at the site is described in more detail in response to Question 17. Pinecrest Limestone Member of the Tamiami Formation The Pinecrest Limestone is an informally recognized member of the Tamiami formation in western Collier County. The Pinecrest Limestone is typically a light grey, biomicritic limestone with good moldic porosity. It is mined for aggregate in areas where it is relatively thick and close to land surface. This limestone contains a fossil fauna (Missimer, 1992) similar to that of the Pinecrest Sand member of the Tamiami Formation, found further east, but the aragonitic shells have been dissolved, typically resulting in a relatively high moldic porosity. On -site the Pinecrest Limestone is approximately 15 feet thick. It thins to the west and thickens to the east across the site. A map showing the thickness of the Pinecrest Limestone is provided as Figure 14 -4. 2. Bonita Springs Marl Member of the Tamiami Formation The Bonita Springs Marl is a green to grey carbonate mud and clay which, in places, is interbedded with quartz sand, shell, and limestone beds. Based on a review of data from wells drilled near the Hacienda Lakes site, the Bonita Springs Marl is gray green or light gray and is Q interbedded with thin, areally restricted, shell and limestone units. In the general area of the site, this unit varies in thickness from approximately five to 15 feet. As described in more detail in Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR1- ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q14 \Question 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 14 Pg. 2 Qthe water resources section below, the Bonita Springs Marl is a low permeability unit that, where present, serves as a confining to semi - confining interval between the overlying water -table aquifer (consisting of the undifferentiated Holocene - Pleistocene sediments and the Pinecrest Limestone) and the underlying Lower Tamiami aquifer (consisting of the Ochopee Limestone). A map showing the thickness of the Bonita Springs Marl is provided as Figure 14 -5. 3. Ochopee Limestone Member of the Tamiami Formation Reese and Cunningham (2000) describe two lithofacies characteristic of the Ochopee Limestone in south Florida: (1) a pelecypod lime mudstone or floatstone; and (2) a pelecypod -rich quartz sand or sandstone. At the Hacienda Lakes site, the top of the Ochopee Limestone member occurs at depths between 25 and 45 feet below land surface (bls) and the base of this unit occurs at depths between about 80 and 100 feet bls. This unit is a fairly pure limestone in the upper part of the section, but tends to become sandier with depth. As with the overlying Pinecrest Limestone, the Ochopee Limestone typically has a well- developed moldic porosity resulting from the dissolution of the aragonitic shells from much of its fossil component. Consequently, the permeability of the unit is usually good to excellent. Since this unit is more areally extensive and thicker than the overlying Pinecrest Limestone, it is the predominant source of fresh groundwater in Collier County. Similar to the Pinecrest Limestone, it is mined for aggregate in areas where it is relatively thick and close to land surface. A map showing the thickness of the Ochopee Limestone is provided as Figure 14 -6. A structure contour map on the top of the Ochopee Limestone is provided as Figure 14 -7. ® Hawthorn Group X Throughout its areal extent, which includes Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina, the Hawthorn Group is composed of approximately 11 formations ranging in age from early Oligocene to early Pliocene. In western Collier County it is composed of the Peace River Formation and the underlying Arcadia Formation. The Peace River Formation unconformably underlies the Ochopee Limestone member of the Tamiami Formation, and serves as a confining interval between the Tamiami Formation and the Arcadia Formation. Peace River Formation The Peace River Formation ranges in age from middle Miocene to early Pliocene. It consists of fine grained quartz sandstones with calcite cement, friable sands, siltstones, clays, and phosphatic sands and gravels. In the area of the Hacienda Lakes site, the quartz sands and sandstones of the upper part of the Peace River Formation immediately underlie the carbonate - dominated strata of the Ochopee member of the Tamiami Formation. Based on pumping tests, these sands and sandstones have a relatively low transmissivity in this area. In the vicinity of the Hacienda Lakes site, the sands and sandstones of the Peace River Formation may be interbedded with limestone and clays. These sands and sandstones are underlain by low permeability clays and siltstones that effectively provide confinement for the underlying mid - Hawthorn aquifer. A structure contour map of the top of the Peace River Formation is provided as Figure 14 -8. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q14\Question 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 14 Pg. 3 QArcadia Formation The Arcadia formation unconformably underlies the Peace River Formation. In places, during its deposition, the Peace River Formation may have scoured down into the top of the Arcadia Formation. The age of the Arcadia Formation is late early Oligocene to Miocene (Scott, 1988). The Arcadia Formation is predominantly a carbonate unit consisting of phosphatic limestones with interbedded marls, clays, dolostones, and sands. The Lower Hawthorn is the most commonly used brackish water source for reverse osmosis water treatment plants in southwest Florida. A structure contour map of the top of the Arcadia Formation is provided as Figure 14 -9. GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY Two aquifers which contain water suitable for irrigation purposes are present at the Hacienda Lakes site. These are the water -table aquifer and the Lower Tamiami aquifer. The water -table aquifer is defined as an unconfined aquifer, one that is directly recharged by rainfall. It is separated from the deeper Lower Tamiami aquifer by the intervening low permeability Bonita Springs Marl member of the Tamiami Formation. The Bonita Springs Marl serves to confine the Lower Tamiami aquifer from the water -table aquifer. As indicated above, there is generally no confinement between the Lower Tamiami aquifer and the underlying Sandstone aquifer in western Collier County. The Sandstone aquifer, composed of the porous portions of the Peace River Formation, is recognized as a distinct aquifer throughout most of southwest Florida. Deeper aquifers at the site, such as the mid - Hawthorn aquifer and the Lower Hawthorn aquifer, contain, with increasing depth, increasingly brackish water (i.e with total dissolved solids concentrations up to 10,000 milligrams per liter). The water quality indicator parameter of dissolved chlorides tends to be higher in the deeper aquifers. The groundwater hydrology at the project site is discussed in greater detail below. Water -Table Aquifer The geologic units that make up the water -table aquifer in the vicinity of the Hacienda Lakes project are the undifferentiated Holocene - Pleistocene sediments and the Pinecrest Limestone member of the Tamiami Formation. In this area, the thickness of water -table aquifer is approximately 20 feet. Recharge to the aquifer originates principally from rainfall on -site, as well as leakage from wetlands located both on -site and off -site. Additional recharge results from the movement through the site of groundwater originating up- gradient. The generalized flow pattern is from northeast to southwest. Discharge is through evapotranspiration and base flow to the Henderson Creek Canal. The pumpage from nearby water -table aquifer wells and a mining operation to the north of the site represent additional potential discharge paths. The hydraulic characteristics of the water -table aquifer can vary greatly depending on the lithologic composition and thickness of the included strata. The presence or absence of the Pinecrest Limestone is the main determinant of the hydraulic characteristics of the unit. Generally, the transmissivity (the rate at which water is transmitted through a unit width of an aquifer under a unit hydraulic gradient,) of the sand section of the water -table aquifer is ® relatively low. At the site, approximately 15 feet of limestone comprises the lower portion of the water -table aquifer. As noted earlier, this limestone typically has well - developed porosity and Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Q14 \Questi0n 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q14 Pg. 4 permeability as a result of dissolution of the aragonitic shells that had been incorporated in this limestone. Based on a transmissivity contour map of the area (Figure 14 -11), a relatively high transmissivity of about 150,000 gallons per day per foot (gpd /ft) is typical for the water -table aquifer at the Hacienda Lakes site. Tamiami Confining Beds Underlying the strata of the water -table aquifer at the Hacienda Lakes project site is the Bonita Springs Marl member of the Tamiami Formation. This is a low permeability unit, approximately five to 15 feet thick, that serves to provide semi - confinement between the overlying water -table aquifer and the underlying lower Tamiami aquifer. Leakance (the rate at which water leaks vertically through a unit thickness of confining beds under a unit hydraulic gradient) between the overlying water -table aquifer and the underlying Lower Tamiami aquifer through the confining unit is dependent on the thickness of the confining unit, the lithology of the confining unit, and the water level differences in the two aquifers. Lower Tamiami Aquifer Where present as a unit with overlying confinement, the Lower Tamiami aquifer in Collier County is a semi - confined or confined aquifer consisting primarily of the Ochopee Limestone Member of the Tamiami Formation. In the vicinity of the Hacienda Lakes site it behaves more as a semi - confined aquifer. In this area, the limestones of the Ochopee Member overly the sands or sandy limestones of the upper part of the Peace River Formation. Based on a transmissivity contour map of the area (Figure 14 -12), a relatively high transmissivity of about 650,000 gpd /ft is typical for the Hacienda Lakes site. Site specific aquifer testing resulted in transmissivity values between 526,000 gpd /ft and 536,000 gpd /ft. Although there is no confinement between the Ochopee Member of the Tamiami Limestone and the underlying sands of the Peace River Formation, the permeability of these sands is relatively low. The implication, therefore, is that there is a contribution to the Lower Tamiami aquifer of water from the sands in the upper part of the Peace River Formation, but this contribution is limited. However, because the deeper Peace River Formation contains more brackish water than the overlying Lower Tamiami aquifer, excessive withdrawals from the Lower Tamiami aquifer can lead to vertical upconing of brackish water. Summary of Aquifer Hydraulic Parameters A summary of aquifer hydraulic parameters for the water -table and Lower Tamiami aquifers is provided as Table 14 -3. The locations at which pumping tests were conducted, from which data the aquifer hydraulic parameters were calculated, are shown on Figures 14 -11 and 14 -12. In addition to the parameters of transmissivity and leakance, which are described above, the parameters of specific yield (for an unconfined aquifer) and storativity (for a confined aquifer) are also important aquifer hydraulic characteristics. Storativity or specific yield is the volume of water an aquifer release or takes into storage per unit surface area per unit change in head. In an ® unconfined aquifer the change in head is the change in water level and the specific yield is Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppon\Hearings \Q14 \Question 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 14 Pg. 5 mainly related to porosity. In a confined aquifer it is also related to rock and fluid compressibility and is usually a relatively small number. Aquifer Recharge Areas Direct infiltration from precipitation is the main source of recharge to the water -table aquifer. Rainfall in excess of 60 inches per year, on average, occurs in southern Collier County; however, only a portion of the total rainfall reaches the water -table aquifer (Knapp, 1986). The Ochopee Limestone does not outcrop at the site, thus there is no direct on -site recharge to the Lower Tamiami aquifer at the site; however, some rainfall recharge likely occurs where the Bonita Springs Marl is relatively thin. The SFWMD design criteria for stormwater management systems require that post - development recharge rates be at least equal to pre - development recharge rates. Therefore, a reduction in recharge to the water -table aquifer as a result of the Hacienda Lakes development is not anticipated. Typically the additions of stormwater lakes result in an increased recharge because the lake sides are in direct contact with the groundwater system. WELL INVENTORY An inventory of on -site and nearby off -site wells is provided as Table 14 -2. Information used in compiling this table was obtained from ENTRIX's in -house database, compiled from projects conducted in the area since 1978, from United States Geological Survey (USGS), Florida Geological Survey (FGS), SFWMD, and Collier County well databases. A map showing the location of these wells is provided as Figure 14 -10. Note that the Collier County well permitting program began in about 1988, thus some wells drilled before that time may not be included in the well inventory. NEARBY PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WELLFIELDS The locations of public water supply (PWS) wellfields in Collier County are shown on Figure 14 -13. The wells shown on the figure include existing and permitted proposed wells. The producing aquifer of each well is color coded. Within the last 10 years, the focus of public water supply has shifted from the shallower fresh water aquifers to supply lime softening water treatment plants (WTPs) to the deeper brackish water aquifers to supply reverse osmosis (RO) WTPs. The nearest public water supply wellfield to the Hacienda Lakes site is the South County RO wellfield. A portion of this wellfield is located adjacent to the west property boundary of the Hacienda Lakes site, along the east side of the FPL power line easement. That wellfield produces groundwater from the brackish mid - Hawthorn aquifer. The locations of public water supply wells adjacent to the project site are shown on Figure 14 -13A. There is significant confinement between the mid - Hawthorn aquifer and the groundwater sources the Hacienda Lakes development proposes to utilize. SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES The Hacienda Lakes site lies in the western part of the Belle Meade Sub -Basin of the Big Cypress Basin. The general drainage trend is from the Immokalee highlands in the northeast Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q14\Question 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q14 Pg. 6 Qtoward the Gulf of Mexico coast in the southwest. Freshwater wetlands are present at the Hacienda Lakes site, as well as in the Picayune Strand State Forest located to the east and south of the project site. The western edge of the project site lies just to the east of the north -south trending Henderson Creek Canal. To the north of the site is the Willow Run rock pit. The various components that contribute to the surface water hydrologic conditions at the Hacienda Lakes site are discussed in greater detail below. Wetlands Wetlands are the most extensive surface water hydrologic features on and adjacent to the site. As Question 13 of the Development of Regional Impact application specifically addresses wetlands, they will be discussed only briefly herein as they pertain to the hydrologic conditions on and abutting the site. The wetlands are fresh -water wetlands that were generally formed in areas of prior deposition of low permeability stream fill materials. Two distinct climatological periods, the wet season, generally from June through early October, and the dry season, generally from mid October through the end of May, occur in this area. A series of 15 shallow piezometers were installed within the Hacienda Lakes project site in 2004 (Figure 14 -14). Water levels in these piezometers were recorded on a weekly basis by Passarella & Associates from July 2004 to December 2005. Wet season and dry season water level contour maps for this time period are provided as Figures 14 -15 and 14 -16 respectively. Hydrographs for two of the piezometers during this time period are provided as Figures 14 -17 and 14 -18. In 2006 and 2007 many of the piezometers were destroyed by wildfires on the project site. In August 2009, several piezometers were reinstalled. Currently there are 12 functioning piezometers on the project site. Wetlands account for much of the Picayune Strand State Forest which lies to the east and south of the Hacienda Lakes site. The Picayune Strand State Forest was formed by the State of Florida from the combination of the South Belle Meade Conservation and Recreation Land Project and the Southern Golden Gate Estates Restoration (SGGE) Project. The SGGE was part of an area formerly planned for residential development. However, it was only sparsely developed. Roads and canals were constructed. These canals have effectively drained the area, resulting in a reduction of water -table aquifer recharge, increased freshwater discharges to the receiving estuaries to the south, invasion by upland vegetation, and increased frequency of forest fires (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2004). The historic surface water drainage pattern for the Picayune Strand area was from the northeast to the southwest, but the construction of the roads and canals, as well as urban and agricultural development of the SGGE altered the pattern to a more north to south pattern. The Hacienda Lakes part of the basin is characterized by a south - southwest flow direction towards the Henderson Creek Canal. Canals The Hacienda Lakes site lies just east of the Henderson Creek Canal which runs along the east side of Florida State Road 951. The Henderson Creek Canal is a part of the Big Cypress Basin administered canal system. It is used for irrigation supply and as an indirect source of potable Q water for the Marco Island Utilities System. A control structure at SR 951 and US 41 serves to maintain a separation between the freshwater upstream (i.e. to the north) and the tidally Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Supp011\Hearings \Q14 \Question 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q14 Pg. 7 influenced saltwater portion of Henderson Creek to the south. A stream gauging station, HEND84, which is location approximately two miles north of the Hacienda Lakes project site, records daily water levels in Henderson Creek Canal. A stage hydrograph showing the average monthly water level of the canal from 1991 to present is provided as Figure 14 -19. A hydrograph for Henderson Creek Canal during the period of record in which groundwater levels were record in the on site piezometers (May 2004 to December 2005) is provided as Figure 14- 20. Outstanding Florida Waters Wild and Scenic Rivers Florida Aquatic Preserves and Florida Class I or II Waters Within Abutting or Downstream of the Site Waters designated as deserving of special protection are listed, by County, in the Florida Administrative Code Chapter 62, Section 302.700. Those water bodies in Collier County that are so designated are: Everglades National Park, waters within the Florida Panther Wildlife Refuge, waters within Collier - Seminole State Park, Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, Barefoot Beach, Cape Romano -Ten Thousand Islands Aquatic Preserve, and Rookery Bay Aquatic Preserve. None of the referenced sites in Collier County fall within or adjacent to the project site. There are no Outstanding Florida Waters, Wild and Scenic Rivers, Florida Aquatic Preserves or Florida Class I or 11 Waters within or abutting the site. The nearest downstream Outstanding Florida Water, also classified as an aquatic preserve, is Rookery Bay. Rookery Bay is located about 5 miles to the south of the Hacienda Lakes site, where the tidally influenced portion of Henderson Creek discharges. ® B. Describe, in terms of appropriate water quality parameters, the existing ground and surface water quality conditions on and abutting the site (The appropriate parameters and methodology should be agreed to by the regional planning council and other reviewing agencies at the pre - application conference stage.) Response: The most commonly analyzed water quality parameter for groundwater is dissolved chloride concentration. Analyses can be done rapidly using either titration or test kit methods. More detailed analyses need to be performed by an analytical laboratory. Dissolved chloride ion concentration is a good indicator parameter for total dissolved chlorides, and thus salinity. There are no persistent on -site surface water bodies. The nearest off -site water bodies, which abut the project site, are Henderson Creek Canal to the west and the borrow pits of the Willow Run Quarry to the north. Since a downstream control structure separates the fresh water of the Henderson Creek Canal from the tidally influenced portion of Henderson Creek, the portion of the canal proximal to the site are anticipated to contain fresh water throughout the year. The dissolved chloride concentrations of the canal are expected to be similar to the shallow groundwater of the water -table aquifer. In the spring of 2006, water samples were collected in wells on and abutting the project site. The Q dissolved chloride concentrations of the water -table aquifer ranges from 60 milligrams per liter (mg/1) and 250 mg/1 near the project site. The dissolved chloride concentration of the Lower Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP'0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Suppo>t\Hearings \Q14 \Questi0n 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q14 Pg. 8 Tamiami aquifer ranges from 150 mg/l to 560 mg/1 near the project site. Dissolved chloride concentration contour maps are provided as Figures 14 -21 and 14 -22, respectively. As part of a testing and well drilling program conducted at the project site in 2006, a chloride profile well was installed into the Lower Tamiami aquifer. This well was constructed to determine changes in groundwater quality with depth. The dissolved chloride concentration of the Lower Tamiami aquifer ranged from 450 mg/1 at a depth of 40 feet bls to 860 mg/l at a depth of 120 feet bls. A monthly groundwater monitoring program will be a requirement of the SFWMD water use permit for the development. The details of this monitoring program will be submitted to the SFWMD with the water use permit application. Details of this monitoring program will be submitted to Collier County upon approval of the water use permit. Consistent with the requirements of the Collier County Comprehensive Plan, a predevelopment determination will be conducted of surface water quality in the portion of the Henderson Creek Canal proximal to the site. The water quality parameters of total phosphorous, total nitrogen, biochemical oxygen demand, total suspended solids, lead, zinc, copper, and common lawn care pesticides will be analyzed on a monthly basis at two sampling locations. The water quality monitoring program will be conducted for an approximate five month period overlapping the dry season and wet season. C. Describe the measures which will be used to mitigate (or avoid where possible) potential adverse effects upon ground and surface water quality, including any resources identified in Subsection A. Response: Measures which will be utilized to mitigate potential adverse effects upon surface water and shallow groundwater at, and adjacent to, the site will include all proven effective best management practices (BMP's) which are appropriate at this site. More specifically, these will include proper timing and minimum applications of fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides on the common areas of the property. Best management practices will also be utilized to mitigate any adverse impacts from stormwater runoff. These BMP's will include utilization of detention ponds, vegetative systems such as grassed swales, and water quality inlets (e.g. oil /grit separators). Other BMP's, such as porous pavement in select areas, may also be used. The effectiveness of properly designed detention/retention basins and wetlands in the remediation of stormwater runoff water quality has been well documented (Chan et al, 1982; Peluso and Marshall, 2002). To briefly summarize, water flowing into a wetland or detention/retention basin is slowed by reduction in gradient, dispersed or meandering flow paths, and resistance from vegetative material, thus dissipating the kinetic energy associated with the runoff. Due to the reduced velocities and physical filtering through soils, vegetation, and plant litter, suspended material in the stormwater either settles out or is filtered from the water column. Approximately 90% of suspended material is removed in this manner. Other constituents, such as phosphorous and metals which are adsorbed on suspended materials are also removed from Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q14\Question 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q14 Pg. 9 the water column at this time. Microbiological processes, vegetative uptake, chemical precipitation, oxidation - reduction reactions, and photochemical processes also serve to remove nutrients, heavy metals, organic compounds, and petroleum -based materials from the stormwater runoff in these areas ( Daukus et al, 1989). The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) has concluded that detention basins are a very effective means of controlling loadings of sediment, organics, nutrients, and heavy metals contained in urban stormwater runoff (Athayde et al, 1983). REFERENCES Athayde, D.N., Shelly, P.E., Driscoll, E.D., Gadboury, D., and Boyd, G., 1983, Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program, Volume 1 — Final Report, U.S. EPA, NTIS PB84- 185552. Chan, E., Bursztynsky, T.A., Hantzsche, N., and Litwin, Y.J.,, 1982, The Use of Wetlands for Water Pollution Control, U.S. EPA - 600/2 -82 -086, NTIS PB83 - 107466. Daukus, P.A., Lowry, D., and Walker, W.W., Jr., 1989, Design of wet detention basins and constructed wetlands for treatment of stormwater runoff from a regional 10 shopping mall in Massachusetts, Eastern Conference on Wetland Issues in Land Use and Real Estate, Resource Education Institute, Westford, MA. Knapp, M.S., Burns, W.S., and Sharp, T.S., 1986, Preliminary Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Western Collier County, Florida, South Florida Water Management District Technical Publication 86 -1, West Palm Beach, FL. McCoy, J., 1972, Hydrology of Western Collier County, Florida, Florida Geological Survey, port of Investigations #63, Tallahassee, FL. Missimer, T.M., 1992, Stratigraphic relationships of sediment facies within the Tamiami Formation of southwestern Florida: Proposed intraformational correlations, in Scott, T.M. and Allmon, W.D., eds., The Plio- Pleistocene Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Southern Florida: Florida Geological Survey Special Publication 36„ Tallahassee, FL, p. 63 -92. Peluso, V. F. and Marshall, A., 2002, Best Management Practices for South Florida Urban Stormwater Management Systems, South Florida Water Management District Technical Publication REG -004, 33 p. Reese, R.S. and Cunningham, K.J., 2000, Hydrogeology of the Gray Limestone Aquifer in Southern Florida, U. S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 99 -4213, Denver, Co, 244 p. ® Scott, T.M., 1988, The Lithostratig_raphy of the Hawthorn Group (Miocene) of Florida, Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Q14 \Question 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 14 Pg. 10 C7 Florida Geological Survey Bulletin Number 59, Tallahassee, Fl, 148 p. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2004 Picayune Strand Restoration Project Final Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report, 161 p. Water Resource Solutions, 2003, Lower West Coast Potentiometric Mapping Project, report prepared for the South Florida Water Management District, 74 p., 35 pla Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearin9s \Q14 \Question 14 Water.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q14 Pg. 11 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 15 SOILS 1? «TA" Plannin Visualizag tion CONS U LTING Engin n ^g 1 \ T Vl JL Surveying U QUESTION 15 — SOILS See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (9); POLICIES (6),(9) GOAL (16); POLICY (6) A. 1. Provide a description of each of the soils indicated on Map E utilizing the following format: Soil Descriptions and Interpretations Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q15 \Question 15 Soils.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q15 Pg. 1 Seasonal High Degree &Kind of Degree & Kind of Soil Name & Map Brief Soil Water Table Permeability Rate Limitation for Limitation for Symbol Description Depth & (in /hour) proposed Uses pond Duration Embankments Nearly level and poorly (2) Holopaw fine drained. Located in 12 inches for 3 -6 0 Severe (wetness) Severe ( cutbanks sand, Limestone sloughs and broad months .2 -2.0 cave, wetness) substratum, Hydric drainageways. Slopes range from 0 to 2 %. (4) Chobee, Level and poorly Limestone substratum and Dania drained. Located in cypress swamps and Ponded for 6 months Chobee: 0.06 -0.2 Dania: 6.0 -20 Severe (ponding) Severe (ponding) mucks, Depressional, marshes. Slopes range Hydric from 0 to I%. (6) Riviera, Nearly level and poorly Limestone drained. Located in 12 inches for 3 -6 Riviera: 0.2 -6.0 Severe (wetness) Severe ( cutbanks substratum - sloughs and cypress months Copeland: 0.6 -6.0 cave, wetness ) Copeland fine sand, swamps. Slopes range Hydric from 0 to 2 %. (10) Oldsmar fine Nearly level and poorly Severe (cutbanks sand, Limestone drained. Located on 6 -18 inches for 1 -6 0.06 -0.2 Severe (wetness) cave, wetness) substratum, Non- flatwoods. Slopes range months hydric from 0 to 2 %. Nearly level and poorly (11) Hallandale fine drained. Located on 6 -18 inches for 1 -6 6.0 -20 Severe (wetness) Severe (depth to rock, wetness) sand, Non -hydric flatwoods. Slopes range months from 0 to 2 %. Nearly level and poorly (14) Pineda fine drained. Located in 12 inches for 3 -6 0.06 Severe (wetness) Severe (cutbanks sand, Limestone sloughs and broad months -0.2 cave, wetness) substratum, Hydric drainageways. Slopes range from 0 to 2 %. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q15 \Question 15 Soils.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q15 Pg. 1 2. Describe the potential for subsidence and any unique geologic features (such as sand dunes, bluffs, sinkholes, springs, steepheads, etc.) on the site. Discuss what aspects of the site plan will be used to compensate for or take advantage of these features. Response: There is no evidence of areas prone to subsidence within the Hacienda Lakes boundary. The Hacienda Lakes site does not present any of the listed geological features. Q:\2005 \0501.50.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppon\Hearings \Q15 \Question 15 Soils.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 15 Pg. 2 Nearly level and poorly (18) Riviera fine sand, Limestone drained. Located in sloughs and broad 12 inches for 3 -6 0.6 -6.0 Severe (wetness) Severe ( cutbanks cave, wetness) substratum, Hydric drainageways. Slopes months range from 0 to 2 %. Nearly level and poorly (20) Ft. Drum and drained. Located on 6 -18 inches for 1 -6 Ft. Drum: 6.0 -20 Severe (wetness) Severe (cutbanks Malabar, High, Fine ridges along sloughs. months Malabar: <0.2 cave, wetness) sands, Non -hydric Slopes range from 0 to 2 %. Nearly level and poorly (2 1) Boca fine sand, drained. Located on 6 -18 inches for 1 -6 0.6 -2.0 Severe (wetness) Severe (cutbanks Non - hydric flatwoods. Slopes range months cave, wetness) from 0 to 2 %. Level and poorly (22) Chobee, Winder drained. Located in Ponded for 6 <0.2 Severe ( ponding, Severe (cutbanks cave, ponding, excess and Gator soils, depressions and months subsides) humus) Depressional, Hydric marshes. Slopes range from 0 to 1 %. Level and poorly (25) Boca, Riviera, drained. Located in Boca: 0.6 -2.0 Limestone substratum and depressions, cypress Ponded for 6 -6. Riviera: 0.2-6.0 Severe (ponding) Severe (cutbanks cave, ponding) Copeland FS, swamps, and marshes. months Copeland:.2 0 Depressional, Hydric Slopes range from 0 to 1%. (3 1) Hilolo, Nearly level and poorly Limestone substratum, Jupiter drained. Located on hammocks and 6 -18 inches for 1-6 Hilolo: 0.06 -0.2 Jupiter and Margate: Severe (wetness) Severe (cutbanks cave, wetness, depth and Margate soils, flatwoods. Slopes range months 0.06 -0.2 to rock) Hydric from 0 to 2 %. (38) Urban Land - Matlacha -Boca Nearly level and poorly drained. Located in Varies depending on fill and extent Matlacha: 0.2 -0.6 Matlacha: Moderate Severe ( cutbanks Complex, Non- urban areas and rock of artificial Boca: 0.6 -2.0 (wetness) Boca: Severe (wetness) cave, wetness) hydric quarries. Slopes range drainage g from 0 to 2 %. Nearly level and poorly (49) Hallandale and Boca fine sands, drained. Located in sloughs and broad 12 inches for 3 -6 Hallandale: 6.0 -20 Severe (wetness) Severe (cutbanks cave, wetness, depth Hydric drainageways. Slopes months Boca: 0.6 -2.0 to rock) range from 0 to 2 %. 2. Describe the potential for subsidence and any unique geologic features (such as sand dunes, bluffs, sinkholes, springs, steepheads, etc.) on the site. Discuss what aspects of the site plan will be used to compensate for or take advantage of these features. Response: There is no evidence of areas prone to subsidence within the Hacienda Lakes boundary. The Hacienda Lakes site does not present any of the listed geological features. Q:\2005 \0501.50.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppon\Hearings \Q15 \Question 15 Soils.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 15 Pg. 2 QB. Where a soil presents a limitation to the type of use proposed in the development, state how the limitation will be overcome. Specify construction methods that would be used for building, road and parking lot foundations, and for lake or canal bank stabilization as relevant. Response: The limitations noted on the soils description and interpretation table will be overcome by improving the drainage patterns. The site will be graded to maintain adequate drainage at all points and all structures will be constructed over compacted fill material. Typical reinforced foundations such as slab on grade will be used for building structures. Typical stabilized subgrades and limerock bases will be utilized for all pavement applications. Lake banks will be graded at a 4:1 and will be planted to avoid erosion. C. What steps will be taken during site preparation and construction to prevent or control wind and water soil erosion? Include a description of proposed plans for clearing and grading as related to erosion control. Response: Erosion and sediment controls will be outlined in the NPDES Construction Pollution Prevention Plan. Soil stockpiles and any disturbed portions of the site where construction activity temporarily ceases for 21 days will be seeded. The portions, which are to be paved, will be temporarily stabilized by applying stone sub -base until pavement can be applied. Silt fences will be installed along the entire development boundary to prevent erosion. D. To what degree and in what location(s) will the development site be altered by fill material? If known, specify the source location and composition of the fill. Also identify the disposal location for any overburden or spoil. Response: The project area consists of t 2,262 acres of which ± 714 acres will be altered by fill material. The fill will be obtained onsite from lake excavations, however at this time, no soil borings have been conducted. Therefore, the composition of the fill is not known. According to preliminary earthwork calculations all excavated material will be used onsite. Therefore, no disposal of spoil material is expected at this time. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Q15 \Question 15 Soils.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q15 Pg. 3 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 16 FLOODPLAINS ]DIATA Planning Visualization CONSM,i ING F give -g 1 \ ► 1L 1 Surveying C QUESTION 16 — FLOODPLAINS See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (8); POLICY (8) GOAL (16); POLICY (6) A. Identify any pre- and post - development flood prone areas. Response: The Hacienda Lakes project is located in an area that is currently part of Collier County/ Big Cypress Basin study, intended to identify and restore the historical flood patterns. The study will be concluded in the near future and will be used to identify any existing areas susceptible to flooding. The stormwater management system for the project will be designed in accordance with the Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District rules and regulations. The minimum road elevation will be established at the peak elevation of the 25 year - 3day storm event and the minimum finished floor elevation will be established at the 100 year - 3day peak stage as defined in the existing regulation. B. Is any development proposed within a 100 -year flood prone area as identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency? If so, indicate the appropriate Flood insurance Rate Map (FIRM) zone designations and their locations, etc. Response: The project site is not located within a FEMA 100 -year flood prone area. The QHacienda Lakes development is in the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, panel 610 of 1150. The area is designated as shaded Zone X with no minimum elevation assigned (areas of 500 -year flood, areas of 100 -year flood with average depth of less than 1 -foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile and area protected by levees from 100 -year flood). C. If any structures, roadways or utilities are proposed within the post - development 100 - year flood prone area, identify their location and indicate what measures will be taken to mitigate the potential flood hazard and to maintain the 100 -year floodplain storage volume. U Response: The project does not propose any structures within the post - development 100 -year flood prone area. Based on the information obtained from the ongoing studies mentioned above, the existing 100 -year storage volume will be determined and adequate compensation will be recreated and relocated. D. Discuss any potential increases in the off -site flooding due to the development of this project. Response: No increase of the off -site flooding will be caused by this project. As explained before, adequate compensation volume will be provided within the project boundaries. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q16 \Question 16 Floodplains.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q16 Pg. 1 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 17 WATER SUPPLY Planning Vicualizanon CONSU[A IN, Fngi�enng 1 -\ t VA. .JL S_ i.,g QUESTION 17 - WATER SUPPLY Adopted Level of Service Standard: 170 gpd /person for residential, 0.1 gpd /sq.ft for commercial, 0.15 gpd/sq.ft. for office, 100 gpd /room for hotel. Existing Level of Service: 170 gpd/person for residential, 0.1 gpd /sq.ft for commercial, 0.15 gpd /sq.ft. for office, 100 gpd/room for hotel. Level of Service After Project Build out: 170 gpd /person for residential, 0.1 gpd /sq.ft for commercial, 0.15 d/s .ft. for office, 100 gpd /room for hotel. A. 1. Provide a projection of the average daily potable and non - potable water demands at the end of each phase of development. If significant seasonal demand variations will occur, discuss anticipated peaks and duration. Use the format below: Response: The demand has been calculated using a 2.0 person per dwelling unit. The projected irrigated acreage for the Hacienda Lakes site is summarized on Table 17 -1. The non - potable demands are for irrigation of the common areas, and the residences. A total of 260 acres of the 2262 acre site are anticipated to be irrigated. This results in an average demand of Q1.482 million gallons per day (MGD) and a maximum demand of 2.319 MGD (Table 17 -2). Table 17.A.1 Potable /Non - Potable Water Demand Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Supp0rt\Hearings \Q17 \Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q17 Pg. 1 Potable Water Demand (MGD) Non - Potable Water Demand MGD) Total Water Demand (MGD) Irrigation Other Existing 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 Year - 2012 Residential 0.02 0.13 - 0.15 Commercial 0.00 0.01 - 0.02 2012 Build -out 0.02 0.14 - 0.16 Year - 2013 Residential 0.07 0.22 - 0.31 Commercial 0.03 0.01 - 0.03 Office 0.00 0.00 0.00 2013 Build -out 0.10 0.23 - .35 Year - 2014 Residential 0.07 0.10 - .19 Commercial 0.03 0.01 - 0.03 Office 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 0.01 0.00 0.01 2014 Build -out 0.11 0.11 - 0.22 Year - 2015 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Supp0rt\Hearings \Q17 \Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q17 Pg. 1 u (WI Residential 0.09 0.10 - 0.19 Office 0.00 0.03 - 0.03 School 0.01 0.00 - 0.01 2015 Build -out 0.10 0.13 - 0.23 Year - 2016 200 170 2.0 68,000 Residential 0.09 0.10 - 0.19 2016 Build -out 0.09 0.10 - 0.19 Year - 2017 275 170 2.0 93,500 Residential 0.09 0.10 - 0.19 2017 Build -out 0.09 0.10 - 0.19 Year - 2018 210 170 2.0 715400 Residential 0.09 0.10 - 0.19 2018 Build -out 0.09 0.10 - 0.19 Year - 2019 Residential 0.07 0.08 - 0.15 2019 Build -out 0.07 0.08 - 0.15 Total (Build -out) 0.67 1.00 - 1.67 A. 2. Describe how this demand information was generated, including the identification of the consumption rates assumed in the analysis. Response: Potable Water The average daily potable demand for each phase of the DRI is presented below in Table 17.A.2a, and 17.A.2b. Residential water demand, assuming 2- person per dwelling unit, was estimated in accordance with the standards established in Collier County Government, Public Utilities Engineering Dept., 2010 Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). The Level of Service Standard (LOSS) is 170 gallons per capita (peak population) per day; sourced from Collier County Government, Public Utilities Engineering Dept., 2010 Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). Table 17.A.2a FstimatPd Avera¢e DAN Potable Water Demands - Residential Development Staging Residential (Units) Flow ( d /ca ita) People Per Unit Avg. Flow ( d Stage 1 2012 50 170 2.0 17,000 2013 200 170 2.0 68,000 2014 200 170 2.0 68,000 2015 275 170 2.0 93,500 Stage 2 2016 275 170 2.0 93,500 2017 275 170 2.0 93,500 2018 275 170 2.0 93,500 2019 210 170 2.0 715400 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q17 \Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q17 Pg. 2 Total (Build -out) 598,400 �1 Commercial water demand, assuming 0.1 gpd/ft , Office water demand, assuming 0.15 gpd /ft2, school demand, assuming 14 gpd/student, and hotel demand, assuming 100 gpd /room, was estimated in accordance with the standards established in F.A.C., Section 64E -6.008 System Size Determinations, Table 1. Table 17.A.2b Estimated Average Daily Potable Water Demands — Commercial/Office/Hotel Staging (Fiscal Year Comm. z (ft) Flow Comm. (gpd /ftz) Office z (ft) Flow Office (gpd /ftz) School (students) Flow School (gpd /st) Hotel (Rooms) Flow Hotel gpd /room) Avg. Flow (gpd) Land Use 0 2012 27,500 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,750 2013 150,000 0.1 20,000 0.15 0 0 0 0 18,000 2014 190,000 0.1 25,000 0.15 0 0 135 100 36,250 2015 20,000 0.1 25,000 0.15 919 14 0 0 18,616 2016 20,000 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 2017 20,000 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 2018 20,000 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 2019 20,000 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 Total (Buildout) 83,616 Response: Non - Potable Water The irrigation demands were calculated using the Blaney - Criddle method for determining crop irrigation requirements integrating a soil factor of 0.4 and an irrigation efficiency of 75 %. This is the standard methodology used by the SFWMD for determining irrigation demands and water use allocations. A summary of the Blaney - Criddle calculation is shown on Table 17 -2. Table 17.A.2c Estimated Irrigated Acreage and Allocation Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q17\Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 17 Pg. 3 Estimated Average Annual Hacienda Lakes Acres Irrigated % Irrigated Allocation Based on Land Use Acreage Blaney - Criddle Method (MGD) 2012 Residential 16.0 50% 8.0 0.03 (Excluding Lakes) Commercial 11.4 25% 2.9 0.01 Attraction & 49.6 50% 24.8 0.10 Passive Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q17\Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 17 Pg. 3 Recreation 2013 Residential 51.1 50% 25.6 0.10 (Excluding Lakes) Commercial 11.4 25% 2.9 0.01 Attraction & Passive 49.6 50% 24.8 0.10 Recreation Public ROW 9.2 50% 4.6 0.02 2014 Residential 51.1 50% 25.6 0.10 (Excluding Lakes) Commercial 11.4 25% 2.9 0.01 2015 Residential 51.1 50% 25.6 0.10 (Excluding Lakes) Medical 35.7 25% 8.9 0.03 2016 Residential 51.1 50% 25.6 0.10 (Excluding Lakes) 2017 Residential 51.1 50% 25.6 0.10 (Excluding Lakes) 2018 Residential 51.1 50% 25.6 0.10 (Excluding Lakes) 2019 Residential 43.5 50% 21.8 0.08 (Excluding Lakes) Total 544 255 1.0 B. Provide a breakdown of sources of water supply, both potable and non - potable, by development phase through project completion. Use the format below. Response: Potable Water The potable water needs at the Hacienda Lakes will be met by Collier County Public Utilities. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q17 \Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q17 Pg. 4 QResponse: Non - Potable Water The build -out period for the development is anticipated to be eight years. The primary non- potable water infrastructure, consisting of the supply wells, storage lake, and pumping station, will be constructed during the first year. The main irrigation water distribution lines will be constructed during the first year when the major road infrastructure is installed. Irrigation distribution laterals, along side streets, and to individual residences, will be constructed in conjunction with the installation of those side streets and individual residences. The non - potable water supply will be from the on -site lake system, which will be recharged on a 1:1 ratio by wells withdrawing groundwater from the water -table and Lower Tamiami aquifers. Approximately 90% of the non - potable groundwater supply will be from the Lower Tamiami aquifer via four wells and 10% will be from the water -table aquifer via three wells. In addition, the developer will make application to Collier County Utilities to obtain reuse water for irrigation purposes. However, that application will result in the site being placed on a waiting list which currently includes about 140 prior applicants. Thus, it is unlikely the site will receive any reuse water in the foreseeable future. In phase 1, one well that taps the water -table aquifer and one well that taps the Lower Tamiami aquifer will be installed and tested for specific capacity and water quality. Based on testing results, it will be determined when the remaining proposed wells need to be installed to meet the ® irrigation demands, and to be in compliance with the SFWMD. Table 17.13 Potable/Non- Potable Water Supply (MGD) M Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings\Q17\Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 17 Pg. 5 Water Supply Source Total Demand Groundwater Surface Water* Collier County Public Utilities Total = demand from Table 17.A.1 Existing - - - - - 2012 Potable - - 0.02 0.02 0.02 Non - Potable - - - - - Irrigation 0.14 - - 0.14 0.14 Other - - - - - 2013 Potable - - 0.10 0.10 0.10 Non - Potable - - - - - Irrigation 0.23 - - 0.23 0.23 Other - - - - - 2014 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings\Q17\Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 17 Pg. 5 Potable - - 0.11 0.11 0.11 Non - Potable - - - - - Irrigation 0.11 - - 0.11 0.11 Other - - - - - 2015 Potable - - 0.10 0.10 0.10 Non - Potable - - - - - Irrigation 0.13 - - 0.13 0.13 Other - - - - - 2016 Potable - - 0.09 0.09 0.09 Non - Potable - - - - - Irrigation 0.10 - - 0.10 0.10 Other - - - - - 2017 Potable - - 0.09 0.09 0.09 Non - Potable - - - - - Irrigation 0.10 - - 0.10 0.10 Other - - - - - 2018 Potable - - 0.09 0.09 0.09 Non - Potable - - - - - Irrigation 0.10 - - 0.10 0.10 Other - - - - - 2019 Potable - - 0.07 0.07 0.07 Non - Potable - - - - - Irrigation 0.08 - - 0.08 0.08 Other - - - - - * Note: The irrigation water supply will be from the on -site lake system, which will be recharged on a 1:1 ratio by groundwater withdrawn from on -site wells C. If water wells exist on -site, locate them on Map H and specify those that will continue to be used. Also locate on Map H all proposed on -site wells. (For residential developments, if individual wells for each lot are proposed, simply indicate the number of units to be served, general locations, and any plans for eventual phase -out.) Indicate the diameter, Q depth and pumping rates (average and maximum) for each of the existing wells and project this information for the proposed wells (for lots served by individual wells, this Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERPM03 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q17\Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 17 Pg. 6 information may be grouped for projection purposes). Also provide a breakdown of the wells with regard to potable and non - potable sources. Response: There are no existing water supply wells on the site. The location of the planned non- potable water supply wells are shown on Figure 17 -1. A summary of the anticipated construction details for these wells is provided on Table 17 -3. D. If on -site water wells are used, will this result in interference with other water wells or result in adverse impacts to underlying or overlying aquifers? Document the assumptions underlying this response. Response: Existing Legal Users The location of nearby groundwater users with SFWMD water use permits is shown on Figure 17 -2. The location of existing and proposed wells associated with those water use permits is shown on Figure 17 -3. The location of known nearby domestic supply wells is also shown on Figure 14 -10. The South Collier County Reverse Osmosis (RO) Wellfield is located adjacent to the project site along CR 951 and the FPL easement east of CR 951 (Figure 14 -13A). These wells, which are permitted (WUP No. 11- 00249 -W) to withdraw brackish groundwater from the mid - Hawthorn aquifer, are cased to approximately 300 feet bls and are completed to approximately 420 feet bls. The mid - Hawthorn aquifer is a confined aquifer, the top of which is located, as shown on Figure 14 -1, approximately 180 feet below the base of the Lower Tamiami aquifer. Due to the extensive thickness of confining beds which separate the mid - Hawthorn aquifer from the overlying water -table and Lower Tamiami aquifers, no impacts are expected to the Collier County wells as a result of withdrawals from the shallower Hacienda Lakes irrigation supply wells. The Collier County Growth Management Plan, enacted in 1997, and amended several times thereafter, with Ordinance 2007 -16 being the latest, contains a wellhead protection provision (Policy 3.1.1). Four wellhead protection zones are defined by travel times within aquifers. Travel times are typically determined by computer modeling, which integrates aquifer parameters with withdrawal rates. Certain land use prohibitions and restrictions are defined for each of the four protection zones. For the most restricted zone, Protection Zone 1, which is from a public supply well to the one year travel isotime contour, prohibitions include new solid waste landfills and transfer stations, new wastewater treatment plants, new petroleum exploration and development, and on -site sewage disposal systems. Restrictions include nonresidential use of hazardous products in quantities exceeding 250 gallons or 1,000 pounds, unless secondary containment is provided. The land use practices of the Hacienda Lakes development do not include any of the Protection Zone 1 prohibited uses. Q:\2005\050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q17\Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 17 Pg. 7 Collier County periodically updates their public water supply wellhead protection zone maps whenever data is available. The latest update (2007) does not incorporate the newly constructed South County mid - Hawthorn aquifer brackish water wellfield. Thus, the State of Florida wellhead protection rule prevails in the interim. State wellhead protection provisions are codified in FAC Chapter 62, Section 521. In addition to the prohibitions contained in the Collier County ordinance, the State rule prohibits new aboveground and underground storage tanks for petroleum products. Unlike the Collier County wellhead protection ordinance, the State rule does not utilize a scientifically based method (e.g. computer modeling) to define protection zones, but rather provides for a blanket 500 foot radius protection zone around each public water supply well. It is anticipated that updated modeling to define isotravel time contours for those new wellfields will result in portions of the Hacienda Lakes property falling within certain wellfield protection zones. However, none of the identified prohibited land uses are proposed for the property. As indicated above, neither the Collier County or State of Florida wellhead protection rules restrict all land uses near public water supply wells. Therefore, there is not a radius around such a well in which land must remain fallow within the development. Proposed Impacts In order to determine potential impacts to existing legal users, wetlands, and underlying and overlying aquifers a computer model of the hydrogeology of the site was constructed. The model was constructed following the guidelines in the SFWMD Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications (BOR), Section 1.7.5.2 Modeling Data. The SFWMD is the agency tasked with approving water use in the area of the project site, and will require that the applicant demonstrate that withdrawals do not result in adverse impacts to sensitive areas and existing legal users of water. The model will be submitted to the SFWMD for review and comment, and will need SFWMD approval prior to obtaining a water use permit. The SFWMD may request modifications to the model. The model uses the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Modular Three - Dimensional Groundwater Flow Model, known as MODFLOW -2000 (Harbaugh, Banta, Hill, and McDonald, 2000). A summary of the model construct is provided on Table 17 -4. A map showing the model grid is provided as Figure 17 -4. The grid was designed to obtain both appropriate resolution at the project site and to enable the model to extend a sufficient distance so that anticipated cumulative pumpage would not be impacted by the limits of the model domain. The model grid covers an approximate area of 236 square miles and is composed of 80,676 cells resulting from 162 columns, 166 rows, and 3 layers. The model discretization is variably spaced, with cell dimensions ranging from 50 feet in the model core area to 2,000 feet in the perimeter buffer areas. The model consists of three layers, representing the water -table aquifer, the underlying confining beds, and the Lower Tamiami aquifer. The model was calibrated to on -site aquifer testing data for the water -table and Lower Tamiami aquifers collected in 2006. Calibration is the process of adjusting the model parameters to minimize the difference between observed and 10 simulated water levels. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Ql7\Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 17 Pg. 8 Two model scenarios were considered. The first scenario simulated the proposed water -table aquifer and Lower Tamiami aquifer withdrawals of the Hacienda Lakes development. Results of this scenario determined the areal extent of the cone of depression in the two aquifers resulting from the proposed withdrawals. Section 1.7.5.2 of BOR defines the cone of depression by the 0.10 foot drawdown contour in a water -table aquifer and by the 1.0 foot drawdown contour in a confined aquifer. The second scenario simulated proposed withdrawals and cumulative withdrawals of other existing legal users within the cone of depression. Scenario 1: Model Simulating Proposed Withdrawals The model simulated the proposed maximum withdrawals of 1.45 MGD of the project site for a period of 90 days with no recharge to the system. This withdrawal rate was calculated using the modified Blaney - Criddle calculation (Table 17 -2) and assumes a 1 -in -10 year drought condition. Water level drawdown maps for the water -table aquifer and the Lower Tamiami aquifer resulting from the proposed withdrawals are provided as Figures 17 -5 and 17 -6, respectively. The maximum simulated drawdown in the water -table aquifer and the Lower Tamiami aquifer is 1.0 feet and 1.2 feet, respectively. Scenario 2: Model Simulating Cumulative Withdrawals The model simulated the proposed maximum withdrawals as well as withdrawals from other existing legal users within the simulated cone of depression. Water level drawdown maps resulting from cumulative withdrawals are provided as Figures 17 -7 and 17 -8, respectively. Cumulative modeling results indicate that the maximum on -site and off -site drawdown in the water -table aquifer is about 1.3 feet and 3.8 feet respectively. The maximum simulated drawdown in the Lower - Tamiami aquifer is about 1.6 feet at the cells simulating proposed on- site wells. E. Who will operate and maintain the internal water supply system after completion of the development? Response: Water supply for the residential portion of the Project will be located within the right - of -way or public Collier County Utility Easements (CUEs). Therefore, all water facilities within the residential areas will be owned and maintained by Collier County Public Utilities. Water supply for the commercial portion of the project will be owned and maintained by the owner, or association. After completion of the development, the non - potable water system will be operated by the Community Development District. F. 1. If an off -site water supply is planned; attach a letter from the agency or firm 19 providing service outlining: Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRi -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Q17 \Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 17 Pg. 9 Qa. The projected excess capacities of the water supply facilities to which connection will be made at present and for each phase through completion of the project. Response: The Retained /Constructed System Capacity (MGD) and Total Constructed Plant Capacity On -line was estimated in accordance with the standards established in Collier County Government, Public Utilities Engineering Dept., 2010 Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR) for the following table. Table 17.F.1.a Level of Service Standards (LOSS) Assessment for Service Area & Additional Proposed Capacity Fiscal Year & Development Staging Total Constructed Plant Capacity on -line (MGD) Retained Reliable System Capacity (MGD) Demand per Phase (MGD) Remaining System Capacity after Buildout (MGD) 2010 (Existing) 52 14.18 0.000 14.18 Stage 1 2012 52 12.45 0.020 12.43 2013 52 11.58 0.086 11.49 2014 52 10.69 0.104 10.59 2015 52 9.71 0.112 9.60 Stage 2 2016 52 8.64 0.096 8.54 2017 54 9.36 0.096 9.26 2018 54 8.26 0.096 8.16 2019 1 54 7.20 1 0.073 1 7.13 b. Any other commitments that have been made for this excess capacity, Response: Per Table 17.F.1.a, the Retained Constructed System Capacity can handle the additional demand per proposed improvements. Please see the attached Collier County letter of availability, Attachment 17.1 C. A statement of the agency or firm's ability to provide services at all times during and after development. (This agency must be supplied with the water demand and supply tables in paragraphs A and B above). Response: Please see the attached Collier County letter of availability, Attachment 17.1 Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q17 \Question 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q17 Pg. 10 • F. 2. If service cannot be provided at all times during and after development, identify the required capital improvements, timing, cost and proposed responsible entity for each phase in which service is unavailable. Response: Not applicable G. Please describe any water conservation methods or devices incorporated into the plan of development. What percentage of reduction is anticipated over conventional plans? Response: Water saving plumbing devices will be used as required by the current building code. Irrigation systems will utilize rain or moisture sensors to prohibit the use of irrigation water during times when it is not needed. In order to ensure that the residences comply with SFWMD watering restrictions, there will be metering of irrigation use for each residence. In addition, the Community Development District will utilize a stepped rate structure that will result in increased costs for non - potable water above specific thresholds. Water conservation information materials will be included with monthly billings. Representatives of the Community Development District will also periodically patrol the residential areas to note any non - compliance with SFWMD watering restriction times. Native, drought tolerant plants, will be integrated into the landscaping of the common areas. They will also be recommended to the residences. H. Indicate whether proposed water service will be provided within an established service area boundary. Response: At this time 77% of the Project is located within the current service area boundary and the remaining 23% of the Project is outside the current service area boundary. Please see Exhibit 17 -18 Utility Service Area. REFERENCES Harbaugh, A.W., Banta, E.R., Hill, M.C., and McDonald, M.G., 2000, MODFLOW -2000, The United States Geological Survey Modular Ground -Water Model User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground -Water Flow Process, United States Geological Survey Open File Report 00 -92, 130 p. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SupportHearings,Q1 TQuestion 17 Water Supply (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 17 Pg. 11 o�-r- C014- ty Public Utilities Division 9perations July 8, 2010 Ms. Anna Rosa RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Drive Naples, FL 34109 Subject: Hacienda Lakes Water and Wastewater Availability Dear Ms. Rosa: Potable water service (for domestic and irrigation purposes) and wastewater service are available for the above referenced project via existing lines along Collier Boulevard (CR 951). A master meter shall be required for such facilities as rental apartments, shopping centers, strip malls, high rise condominiums, recreational vehicle parks, mobile home parks or any other multi - family projects that cannot or do not provide the required CUES paralleling a typical single family street cross - section or any other project that does not comply with or meet the intention of Ordinance 2004 -31, as amended or superseded. If this project is not to provide the required Collier County Utility Easements (CUEs), all water and sewer facilities shall be owned and maintained by the owner, his successors or assigns. If this project is to provide the required CUEs, all water and sewer facilities shall be owned and maintained by Collier County Public Utilities. Tie -in to water and sewer lines shall be made after submission and approval of the hydraulic calculations by Engineering Review Services, showing that the downstream systems are adequate to handle the increase in flow. The District will be making phased expansions to the water supply, treatment and transmission facilities and sewage transmission, treatment and disposal facilities servicing the area in question and other areas of the County, based on demands within the system and other binding commitments. These expansions should provide sufficient capacity to supply the referenced property's anticipated potable water and sewage treatment and disposal demands and the remainder of the District's committed capacity. 3301 Tamiami Trail E. • Bldg H P Floor • Naples, FL 34112 . 239- 252 -6237 • FAX 239 - 252 -6789 L o el, County Public Utilities Division eratims July 8, 2010 Ms. Rosa Hacienda Lakes Page 2 However, no guarantee can be issued that other developments throughout the District will not have an impact on the quantity of potable water and sewage treatment and disposal capacity available to this property until each phase has received a commitment for service. Connections are also subject to the availability of water and sewer capacity at the time formal application is received. Should water supply or sewage treatment and disposal capacity not be available, the Developer would be required to provide an interim means of water supply and treatment and sewage treatment and disposal until the District's facilities have the adequate capacity to serve the project. Please note that any and all improvements that you construct must be in accordance with all applicable ordinances and policies, including the payment of impact fees. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at (239) 252 -6237. a Javi i M rtinez Operations Analyst, Public Utilities Operations j aviermartinezQcolliergov.net cc: Gary Morocco, Customer Service Supervisor Heather Sweet, Revenue Services Supervisor Craig Callis, Engineering Review Services Steve Nagy, Wastewater Collections Manager Joe Thomas, Water Distribution Manager 3301 Tamiami Trail E. • Bldg H 3'd Floor • Naples, FL 34112 •239- 252 -6237 • FAX 239 - 252 -6789 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 18 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT Planning Vi QQUESTION 18 — WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT Existing Level of Service: 100 gpd /person for residential, 0.1 gpd/sq.ft for commercial, 0.15 gpd /sq.ft. for office, 100 gpd/room for hotel. Adopted Level of Service Standard: 100 gpd /person for residential, 0.1 gpd/sq.ft for commercial, 0.15 gpd /sq.ft. for office, 100 gpd /room for hotel. Level of Service After Project Build out: 100 gpd /person for residential, 0.1 gpd /sq.ft for commercial, 0.15 d /sq.ft. for office, 100 gpd /room for hotel. A. Provide, in the table given below, the projected wastewater generation at the end of each phase of development and proposed wastewater treatment. Identify the assumptions used to project this demand. Response: The average daily wastewater generation for each phase of the DRI is presented below in tables 18.A -1 and 18.A -3. Residential wastewater demand assumes a 2.0 person per dwelling unit, in accordance with the standard established by Collier County Government and the Public Utilities Engineering Department. The Level of Service standard (LOSS) is 100 gallons per capita per day, in accordance with Collier County Public Utilities Engineering Department and the 2010 Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). For the commercial portion, a generation rate of 0.1 gallons per day per square foot is used, for office 0.15 gallons per day per square foot, for schools 14 gallons per day per student, and for hotel 100 gallons per day per room, in accordance with F.A.C. 64E -8.003 LOS table. Table 18.A -1 Estimated Average Daily Sewage Generation Demands - Residential Development Staging Residential (Units) Sewage Generation Avg. Flow ( d /ca ita) ( d) Stage 1 2012 50 100 10,000 2013 200 100 40,000 2014 200 100 40,000 2015 275 100 55,000 Stage 2 2016 275 100 55,000 2017 275 100 55,000 2018 275 100 55,000 2019 210 100 421000 ETotal (Build -out) 352,000 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q18 \Question 18 Wastewater Mgmt.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 18 Pg. 1 Table 18.A -2 Estimated Average Daily Sewage Generation Demands — Commercial, Office, School, Hotel Development Comm. Sewage Gen. Office Sewage Gen School Sewage Gen. Hotel Sewage Gen. Avg. Flow Staging (ft') (gpd /ft) (ft') (gpd /ft) (students) (gpd /student) (rooms) (gpd /room) (gpd) Stage 1 2012 27,500 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,750 2013 150,000 0.1 20,000 0.15 0 0 0 0 18,000 2014 190,000 0.1 25,000 0.15 0 0 135 100 36,250 2015 20,000 0.1 25,000 0.15 919 14 0 0 18,616 Stage 2 2016 20,000 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 2017 20,000 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 2018 20,000 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 2019 20,000 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,000 Total (Buildout) 83,616 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD - DRI -ERP 0003 DRI - ADA Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support, Hearings QI S Question IS Wastewater Mgtnt.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q18 Pg. 2 Table 18.A -3 Prnit -r inn Wastewater Generation by Phase Phase Wastewater Generation (MGD) On -site Wastewater Treatment (MGD) Off -site Wastewater Treatment (MGD) Existing - - Stage 1 2012 0.013 N/A 0.013 2013 0.058 N/A 0.058 2014 0.076 N/A 0.076 2015 0.074 N/A 0.074 Stage 2 2016 0.057 N/A 0.057 2017 0.057 N/A 0.057 2018 0.057 N/A 0.057 2019 0.044 N/A 0.044 Total (Build -out) 0.436 NIA 0.436 B. If applicable, generally describe the volumes, characteristics and pre- treatment techniques of any industrial of other effluents prior to discharge from proposed industrial - related use(s). Response: All development will be either commercial or residential. Typical commercial uses will include: offices, retail, automotive repair shops, business services, restaurants, gas stations, etc. Therefore, there are no industries generating industrial wastewater planned within the proposed site. Any special wastewater treatment that may be required, for typical commercial businesses, will be handled by a licensed contractor. C 1. If off -site treatment is planned, identify the treatment facility and attach a letter from the agency or firm providing the treatment outlining present and projected excess capacity of the treatment and transmission facilities through build out, any other commitments that have been made for this excess and a statement of ability to provide service at all times during or after development. Response: The offsite treatment plant will be the South County Wastewater Reclamation Facility (SCWRF). A letter of availability has been attached. Please reference Table 18.C.1 and the Collier County 2010 Annual Inventory Report (AUIR) for the excess capacities of the wastewater treatment plant. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q18\Question 18 Wastewater Mgmt.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q18 Pg. 3 Table 18.C.1. Level of Service Standards (LOSS) Assessment for Service Area & Additinnai PrnnnuM (anacity Fiscal Year & Development Staging Total Constructed Plant Capacity on- line (MGD) Retained Constructed System Capacity (MGD) Demand per Phase (MGD) Remaining System Capacity (MGD) 2010 (Existing) 24.10 10.71 0 10.71 Stage 1 2012 24.10 10.00 0.013 9.99 2013 24.10 9.65 0.058 9.59 2014 24.10 9.29 0.076 9.21 2015 24.10 8.90 0.074 8.83 Stage 2 2016 24.10 8.47 0.057 8.41 2017 24.10 8.04 0.057 7.98 2018 24.10 7.61 0.057 7.55 2019 24.10 7.20 1 0.044 1 7.16 C 2. If service cannot be provided, identify the required capital improvements, cost, timing, and proposed responsible entity necessary to provide service at all times during and after development. Response: Wastewater service will be available. The letter of availability is attached as Figure 17.1. No improvements to the wastewater treatment plant will be necessary as a result of this project. D. If septic tanks will be used on site, indicate the number of units to be served, general locations and any plans for eventual phase -out. Response: The Hacienda Lakes project will be served by the South County Wastewater Reclamation Facility. Therefore, no septic tanks will be proposed. E. Indicate whether proposed wastewater service will be provided within an established service area boundary. Response: At this time, 23% of the Project is located outside of the current service area boundary and the remaining 77% of the Project is within the current service area boundary. QPlease see Figure 17 -18 Utility Service Area. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q18 \Question 18 Wastewater Mgmt.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q 18 Pg. 4 co 7e-r County Public Utilities Division Solid Waste July 29, 2010 Mrs. Anna Rosa Planning Coordinator RWA Consulting, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Dr., Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 Re: Hacienda Lake of Naples, LLC Dear Mrs. Rosa; Please accept this letter as official notice of service availability for solid waste services in Collier County. Based on the current population and disposal rate per capita, as outlined in the 2009 Solid Waste AUIR, Collier County has approximately 29 years of disposal capacity remaining. As provided to you in the March 12, 2010 letter for Hacienda Lake Of Naples, LCC letter, the Solid Waste Management Department request that the Hacienda Lake of Naples community partner with us to ensure full compliance with our Recycling Ordinance and provide opportunities for us to further reduce our waste stream through recycling. These initiatives will not only save valuable landfill airspace but protect our environment and preserve natural resources. 'A. CFM, Director Department Solid Waste Management Department - 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. H • Naples, Florida 34112.239- 252 -2508 • FAX 239 - 774 -9222 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 19 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Planning Vimalizariun CON SIII. N "II(: Engineering 1 _ V Vl a Surveying QQUESTION 19- STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Existing Level of Service: Not applicable Adopted Level of Service Standard: 25 Year — 3 Day Storm Event Level of Service After Project Build out: 25 Year — 3 Day Storm Event A. Describe the existing drainage patterns on -site as shown on Map I, including any potential flooding and erosion problems. Response: The Hacienda Lakes (Project) is located east of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), south of Interstate I -75, and north of U.S. 41 in the eastern portion of Collier County. The Project is predominately undeveloped wetlands and agricultural lands and is located within the Henderson Creek Basin. Maps I -2 and I -2 were created using USDA soils maps and topographic information. The predevelopment basin lines show the boundary of the contributing drainage areas. The existing flow direction arrows illustrate the general direction of sheet flow within each basin. The main wetland, which is the outlet for all five basins, is labeled as outlet (wetland) basin line. Currently, the storm runoff produced from the area between the 170 -foot FPL easement, located north & south along the western portion of the property, and Henderson Creek Canal sheetflows toward the west and ultimately into the canal. North to south sheetflow is diverted east and west at Sabal Palm Road. This sheetflow drains runoff toward both the canal and towards the easterly wetlands. The majority of the storm runoff created from the remainder of the site sheetflows to the east from the predevelopment basin line to the main wetland (labeled as outlet wetland basin) located in the middle of the property. This vast wetland stretches into the project and expands as it moves to the east. According to the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map, Panel 610 of 1150 the project is located in a flood zone "X" with no related minimum elevation. B. Describe the various elements of the proposed drainage system shown on Map I, including any wetlands to be used as part of the system, and discuss the design criteria (including stage- storage /stage discharge assumption) to be used for the various elements. Provide typical cross - sections (showing dimensions, slopes and control elevations) for any proposed lakes or swales. Identify the control elevation for all drainage structures. Include information as to what design storm will be used for what portions of the system. Response: The proposed surface water management system will consist of 29 sub - basins, of which compose the 5 basins. There are 29 lakes and least on control structure per basin. The project lies within the Henderson Creek Basin, which has a maximum discharge rate of 0.15 cfs /acre however the discharge rate will be lowered to 0.06 cfs /acre north of Sabal Palm Road to be consistent with the Belle Meade Study. Controlled discharge from basin 1 will be to the large Q wetland located to the east of the property and to the Henderson Creek Canal. The remaining four basins will discharge to the large wetland located to the east of the property. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings\Q19 \Question 19 Stormwater Mgmt (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q19 Pg. 1 The control elevations for the project were determined by analyzing the following data: 1. Wetland Indicator nails set by Passarella & Associates Inc. 2. Data collected from onsite water level monitoring wells since May 2004 by Passarella and Associates Inc. 3. The stage hydrograph for the Henderson Creek Canal was provided by SFWMD, Big Cypress Basin. The control elevations for the proposed basins are 10.0 NGVD. The design storm utilized was a 25 year 3 day storm for the minimum roadway elevation. A 100 year 3 day storm was used for the minimum finished floor elevation and perimeter berm. The design criteria for stage storage volumes and elevations are estimated based on typical land use characteristics in Southwest Florida. Cross sections for both the typical lake, and the typical lake with a littoral planting zone have been attached as Exhibit 19. C. From Map I, indicate the total number of acres in each drainage area and specify the acreage of any portions of drainage areas outside the site boundaries. Complete the following table for on -site drainage areas. Response: The table below provides an estimated land -use summary for each phase of the development. There are no drainage areas outside the site. Table 19.0 Drainage Areas Development Staging g g Impervious Surfaces (Acres) Surface Retention (Acres) Open Space (Acres) Total (Acres) 2009 (Existing) 0 0 0 0 Stage 1 2012 32 13 16 61 2013 67 26 30 123 2014 40 16 18 74 2015 52 21 25 98 Stage 2 2016 40 16 18 74 2017 40 16 18 74 2018 33 13 15 61 2019 27 10 12 49 Total Build -out 331 131 152 614 ® D. Specify and compare the volume and quality of run -off from the site in its existing condition to the anticipated run -off at the end of each phase of development. (The parameters to be used to define "quality" and methodology should be agreed to by the Qi\2005\050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q19 \Question 19 Stormwater Mgna (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q19 Pg. 2 Qregional planning council and other reviewing agencies at the pre - application conference stage.) Identify any changes in timing or pattern of water flows between pre- and post - development conditions. Indicate major points of discharge and ultimate receiving water body(ies). Indicate what provisions will be incorporated in the design of the drainage system, including a summary description of any Best Management Practices to be utilized, to minimize any increase in run -off from the site and to minimize any degradation of water quality in the ultimate receiving body over that occurring in its pre - development state. Response: A PRE vs. Post analysis has been conducted using the United States Soil Conservation Service Technical Release 55 Methodology. Based on this methodology, the pre - development discharge flow is roughly 3 times greater than the post development discharge flow. This difference is attributed to the regulated maximum allowable post development discharge rate of 0.15 cfs /acre per Collier County Ordinance No.90 -10. The major points of discharge and the pre and post development flow arrows can be seen on the attached Maps I- Existing and I- Proposed. The water quality methodology that will be used is that which is outlined in the SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual Volume IV. The following is a summary of the Best Management Practices that will be utilized to accomplish additional water quality treatment beyond what is required by SFWMD: i. Construction Pollution Prevention Plan - outlines construction techniques and maintenance practices to reduce or eliminate the sources of stormwater pollution. ii. Urban Stormwater Management Program - Discuss non - structural controls intended to improve the quality of stormwater runoff at the source of contaminants. iii. 50% additional stormwater runoff volume to be retained. iv. Phyto- Zones - Basins within the detention areas that provide an area for runoff into the lake to disperse. This allows additional time for biological pre - treatment to occur. V. Planted Littoral Zones - provides increased water quality by removing pollutant by biological uptake of nutrients and other ions. vi. Increased Flow Path - Locate inflow and outflow structures to maximize effective treatment time. vii. Spreader Swale use of a swale as the last step in the discharge train. The swale provides additional water quality and decreases erosion, based on energy diffusion (spreading of discharge over a grassed weir instead of discharging through a single pipe). E. Who will operate and maintain the drainage system after completion of the development? Response: The master homeowner association will maintain the stormwater management system. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Ickes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA SupporrHearings \Q19 \Question 19 Stormwater Mgmt (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q19 Pg. 3 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 20 SOLID /HAZARDOUS MEDICAL WASTE DAAVisualization (' ,,. T L L J Engineering 1 -� � 11 1 Surveying QUESTION 20 -SOLID WASTE /HAZARDOUS WASTE /MEDICAL WASTE Existing Level of Service: Two years of lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate of the previous 3 years. Adopted Level of Service Standard: Two years of lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate of the previous 3 years. Level of Service After Project Build out: Two years of lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate of the previous 3 years. A. Provide a projection of the average daily volumes of solid waste generated at the completion of each phase of development. Use the format below and identity the assumptions used in the projection. Table 20.A Solid Waste Generation Phasing Residential Demand Domestic Solid Waste Industrial, Hazardous, (Units) (Tons per Medical, or Other Special Capita per Wastes Year) (Specify by appropriate units /day) Cubic Tons /Day Yards/Day Existing 2012 Stage 1 50 0.59 0.54 0.16 N/A 2013 Stage 1 200 0.59 2.21 0.65 N/A 2014 Stage 1 200 0.59 2.21 0.65 N/A 2015 Stage 1 &2 275 0.59 3.03 0.89 N/A 2016 Stage 1&2 275 0.59 3.03 0.89 N/A 2017 Stage 2 275 0.59 3.03 0.89 N/A 2018 Stage 2 275 0.59 3.03 0.89 N/A 2019 Stage 2 210 0.59 2.31 0.68 N/A Total Build -out 1760 19.35 5.70 N/A Response: Collier County's contractor hauler, Waste Management Company, will collect solid waste generated at the Hacienda Lakes Project. Solid waste collected at the site will be hauled to the Naples Landfill for processing. Single - family residential areas will use the typical Collier County standard garbage containers provided by Collier County for curbside pickup. Recycled materials will be collected from curbside recycling containers through contract haulers. Residential recyclables and horticultural waste will be collected at the curb on a weekly basis. Commercial facilities will utilize dumpster containers for the storage of garbage. Recycling containers will be used to store recyclables in the commercial areas. Construction debris will be collected and processed by a local business specializing in the recycling of construction products. The Applicant has identified Waste Services, Inc. (Pro - Disposal, Inc.) as an available provider for the management of construction debris as well as Alvarez Site Development as an approved FDEP hazardous waste transporter, if needed. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q20 \Question 20 Solid Waste (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q20 Pg. 1 ® Solid waste generation estimates are shown in Table 20.A. The estimates for per capita disposal rate are based on the Public Utilities Engineering Department, 2010 Annual Update Inventory Report (AUIR). A conversion factor of 3.4 c.y. /ton was assumed based on EPA averages documented in EPA, Waste Prevention, recycling, and composting options: Lessons from 30 communities, Feb. 1994. SWFRPC ADA Supplemental Questions - Standard DRI Solid Waste Conditions. 1. The Applicant will provide the projected solid waste quantities for all residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional developments. Response: Please see responses to A. above. 2. The applicant will provide official letters of commitments from the local government jurisdiction, and the applicable franchise haulers showing ability to serve the project's solid waste and hazardous waste needs. Response: Please see availability request letter. 3. The applicant will incorporate the solid waste demands of the project into the county solid waste management program and explore possibilities of extending the life of the landfill by reducing the solid waste volume by incorporating practices such as conservation, recycling, trash, compacting, and mechanical shredding. Response: Reduction of Solid Waste will be incorporated into the Solid Waste Management Program by means of recycling. The proposed development is committed to the State's recycling goal of 75% by 2020 and will pursue measures to limit solid waste generation and maximize recycling. Residential recycling will be encouraged and typical recycling containers will be provided. The development will participate in Collier County's Single Stream Recycling (SSR) program. SSR, which allows recycled material to be comingled in a single bin by the resident and is segregated at a separate location, has proven to significantly increase recycling rates. Recycling will be required for all commercial businesses and will be available for all multi- family developments without individualized curbside pick -up. General conservation and recycling awareness and information can be obtained from the Solid Waste Management Department of Collier County. Compaction and mechanical shredding will be at the discretion of the Naples Landfill. Any business found within the development boundary that generated hazardous waste will be responsible for the temporary storage, sifting and proper disposal of the hazardous waste generated by such business. However, there will be no siting of hazardous waste storage facilities contrary to the county zoning regulations. The project will be bound by all applicable recycling requirements in effect in the County at the time of the development. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support \Hearings \Q20 \Question 20 Solid Waste (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q20 Pg. 2 QAny buildings where hazardous material /waste is to be used, displayed, handled, generated or stored will be constructed with impervious floors with adequate floor drains leading to separate impervious holding facilities that are adequate to contain and safely facilitate cleanups of any spills, leakage, or contained water. Discharge of hazardous waste effluent into the sewage system will be prohibited unless approved by permit issued by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. low] Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \020 \Question 20 Solid Waste (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q20 Pg. 3 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal PART IV TRANSPORTATION RESOURCE IMPACTS Planning Visualization 1 \Sv 1 JL Snurv<yingg QPART IV. TRANSPORTATION RESOURCE IMPACTS QUESTION 21 — TRANSPORTATION See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (11); POLICY (2) GOAL (12); POLICIES (3), (4) GOAL (16); POLICY (1) GOAL (18); POLICIES (1), (3),(4),(6) GOAL (20); POLICIES (2), (3), (8), (9), (10), (12), (13), (15) GOAL (25); POLICY (5) ROAD LINK/INTERSECTION: EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE: ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICES STANDARD: LEVEL OF SERVICE AFTER PROJECT BUILDOUT: Introduction Prior to undertaking the transportation analysis for the Hacienda Lakes DRI, a transportation methodology meeting was held on December 21, 2009. Appropriate assumptions, sources of information, and procedures to be used in the Hacienda Lakes DRI transportation analysis were determined by the review agencies at this meeting. A summary of the transportation methodology correspondence is provided in Appendix 21 -A. This report documents the transportation analysis in the DRI Question 21 format to determine the effect of Hacienda Lakes DRI project traffic on roadway levels of service and current traffic patterns. Throughout this report, the term service capacity has been used to indicate the traffic volume a road may carry before exceeding an adopted level of service. This term has been used to avoid the confusion normally encountered in discussing traffic volumes and service volumes. Also, throughout this report, references have been made to Appendices 21 -A through 21 -K, which contain correspondence and worksheets documenting various analyses. The appendices are provided in a separately bound document entitled "Hacienda Lakes DRI Transportation Appendices" that has been distributed to transportation review agencies only. A. Using Map J or a table as a base, indicate existing conditions on the highway network within the study area (as previously defined on Map J), including AADT, peak -hour trips directional, traffic split, levels of service and maximum service volumes for the adopted level of service (LOS). Identify the assumptions used in this analysis, including "K" factor, directional "D" factor, facility type, number of lanes and existing signal locations. (If levels of service are based on some methodology other than the most recent procedures of the Transportation Research Board and FDOT, this should be agreed upon at the pre - application conference stage.) Identify the adopted LOS standards of the Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERM003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 1 E* FDOT, appropriate regional planning council, and local government for roadways within the identified study area. Identify what improvements or new facilities within this study area are planned, programmed, or committed for improvement. Attach appropriate excerpts from published capital improvements plans, budgets and programs showing schedules and types of work and letters from the appropriate agencies stating the current status of the planned, programmed, and committed improvements. Response: The transportation study network for the Hacienda Lakes DRI was identified based on policies adopted by Collier County. These policies require that all regionally significant roads where traffic from the DRI consumes two percent or three percent of the adopted service capacity of the "existing and committed" road should be included in the study network. The two percent significant impact threshold applies for the first two road segments as traffic leaves or approaches the site, and the three percent threshold applies to segments beyond the first two segments. This criteria was applied so that the same traffic impact study could be used for the DRI analysis and local concurrency requirements. This approach also addresses the study network requirements of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SWFRPC), as their requirement is to recognize significant impacts at the five percent significance level. The trip generation, internal capture, pass -by capture, and distribution and assignment procedures are discussed in subsequent sections of this report. The estimated development traffic volumes were divided by roadway service capacities determined and published in Collier County's "Annual Update and Inventory Report" for roadways, for existing and committed roads, to identify the transportation study network. This analysis is summarized in Appendix 21- B, a plot of the FSUTMS model assignment of DRI trips is provided in Appendix 21 -C, and the resulting study network is illustrated in Figure 21 -1. Adopted capital programs current at the time of this analysis for Collier County and the FDOT were reviewed, and four "committed" road improvement projects (with construction funding scheduled within three years) was identified for study network roads. These improvements are: • Collier Blvd.: U.S.41 to Davis Blvd., 6 -lanes under construction. • Collier Blvd.: Davis Blvd. (S.R.84) to Golden Gate Canal, add lanes, 2010. • Davis Blvd. (S.R.84): Radio Rd. to Collier Blvd., 6 -lanes, 2010. • Davis Blvd. (SR 84): Santa Barbara Blvd to Radio Rd, 4 -lanes, 2012. • Santa Barbara Blvd.: Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. to Davis Blvd., 6- lanes, under construction. Appendix 21 -D contains applicable excerpts from Collier County's adopted 2009 Capital Improvement Program and FDOT Work Program. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearin9s \Q21 \Q21 Transportation 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 2 ® Existing Conditions Existing AADT volumes for all study roadways were estimated from one of three sources as follows: (1) 2008 FDOT AADT volumes adjusted to 2009 conditions using historic growth trends, and (2) 2009 Collier County machine counts adjusted using FDOT seasonal factors. Count data and adjustments are provided in Appendix 21 -E. The source and derivation of study network AADT volumes and all assumptions used to derive these values are also documented in Appendix 21 -E. Existing 2009 PM peak hour, peak season directional traffic volumes were estimated by multiplying the 2009 AADT volume estimates by the K100 (for SIS roads) and K250 (for all other roads), and the D factors reported in Table 21 -1. Appendix 21 -E documents the source and derivation of study network K and D factors and all assumptions used to derive these values. Existing PM peak hour conditions on the study network were identified by comparing the estimated 2009 PM peak hour, peak season traffic volumes with the generalized service capacities documented in Appendix 21 -B. The resulting levels of service are summarized in Table 21 -1. The study network consists of 38 miles of road, carrying 81,169 peak -hour vehicle -miles of travel. The highest volume to service capacity ratio observed is 0.78, and the weighted average Q peak direction volume to service capacity ratio is 0.56, indicating that on average the road network is slightly over 50 percent full -- and substantial capacity is available in the network to accommodate additional travel. U Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -E"\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 3 9 f / / » � & � e 4 ' ! � •C, . } 90 m §m §7 §( A )j � wo ' §) �\ 0-0 @ A / ° . V, m (n CID � . E• z R q 8 0 0 0 0 0 S d r 3 r d z 0 7 W N N b (JQ � � D � � N N — Cn N Cn Cn (n C O C) o C O o o CO Co ) C o U v 3 3 3 3 3 m 7 J a a a________ m m m <_ w m cD m m m o 0 0 0 0 (D m (D m W (l W 07 N W 3 3 v 3 m 3 3 d w NW Qa N m nJ N o7 m (D w D7 CD CD n n W W aaaaaaaoa W W W .. m � @ 2 2 S 2 C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) m m m m m 0 0 0 ( 3 ) . . . . . . . . � N N N N N J n < D_ T.' T� T J� x x o o E �� (o Co (D E �� o o (D 1 N O 7 D_ (1 ( L C1 G) C) D C G) Cn Cn C) n C W r 0 C r m N O r D— O 0 G) O .� N N 0 7 C D N v< 7 N ' J � '< = d-4 d d D 7 CD Q O M W — O W 7 A N 7 N N N A (D (n N CD 7 A O CD W (D N W n 7) .Z) N (D Q< G) Q N W N N 7 d C NT. N a N p_ (OD N CL CL Vi CD a W 411 Q 2 T O_ N c W < 3 0 0 < a z 3 m o n 3 CD Cn G) D o v cn n v 0 s m v v 0 C CD w 0 0 o O C) k' N 7 c N 7 J r2 . - a CL < Cn 0- (D CD �7 Cn 7 N _ (D N N "' (D A N N N N A C) N C N Z CD 7 C (D a W N A Cn N co D3j N o d C a < �TJ p7j T O_ N Q O '<F [S 7 @ N CD N d. 3� o C1 (D CD < N 3 J w . N v a m (D n w 3 m 3 °—° W oo° <a°m 3 0 3 3 a a a° a o 3 oo 0 0 0 O a a n r m N m m _1+1+1+ + O W O O N O O CD (p m A m V N m V m o N W 0) O J N O (T o O V A Cn O W W O A O A V W A �I A O W W co CD IV N O W W -- m Co W o W v (o + N S 7 r C) C) C) m m 0 v m C7 m m m m 0 0 (7 C7 a 0 v>cncncnc�(n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ������'��'��'� N fU N N N (j7 N C 7 C 7 C C C C C cD (j7 CD N (D SD CD S CD D N N (D (D N N N (D N (D N (D v (D (A D D D T D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D (7 A 7 -- - - - - - - y a N ,< — — — C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C � D N U Q 6 Q 6 J Q Q Q U a Q Q a a U (T U Q U Q Q Q Q 'D J N N 7 N 7 N 7 N N 7 7 N N 7 N 7 N N 7 7 N N J 7 N N 7 7 N 7 N 7 N 7 N J N N J 7 N 7 N 7 N 7 N 7 v � (D N W N W W W N N N N N N W W W (.> N N N O O O N V V N N W o o Cn o w W� N N O A N— v� V cn V cn V cn o 000 Cn N N Cn 000000000000000000 O A . A O N (D V V V V V O (n m W W v C) C) n () 0 N C) °o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N Cn n C) (7 C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) n C) C) C) C) C) C 0 < 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 c 0 C C C C C C (n 6-C C c C C C c c J C c 7 C 7 C 7 C C 7 7 c 7 C 7 7 W 7 .-. » `< `G '< J `G » `G '< J 7 'G 'G '< 'G K 'G K `G 'G `G `G `G `G D D D D D J D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D C_ C C_ C C_ C C_ C_ C_ C C C_ C_ C_ C_ �J T7 0 o T1 S A O Cn -cn N W N� -m o N co W o W W co m m 0 D O W w m Cn J o A N r2 W m 0) O O N) N m co m m W A C �� 0) m V W A m Co A A (n N o V Co m V� Co V (n V V�� CO W V V O A W W O O Ol Cn m Co A CD A o C 1 O O O CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O pip O O O O O O T O 0 O 0 O Co O o O O o o 7 O CO(D O O O CO 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O 0(D O O 0 O 0 O O (D 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 N 0 x cn m Cn m Cn m Cn m (n O m V N Cn m (n m Cn (n m m Cn m m m of (n m m (n m cn m (n m Cn m (n cn m m Cn m cn m Cn m Cn m Cn m p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O T y Cn Cn Cn Cn (n Cn 7 Cn Cn m (n m (n m Cn Cn Cn (n Cn m Cn Cn m (T Cn CO CO m N cn O m W V W W A A V CD V V V N V O m ? (n mmm mzzzzzzzzzzzm oCD Odmlml W W m Cp N W W W W W W co co 03 W W W W W W W m W W s 00000 0000000000 C) C) C) C) C) O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O (D N (D N (D 0 O (D N (D N (D (D (� (D N N O O O N N (D N (D C)C)nO )� DC)nC)nC)C)C)C)nC)DDDOC)C)C)(7 N o O O O o (-) 7 O O O O O 0 O C 0 C O O C C m m m C OC C C C C C c C C 7 N N c 7 C C J 7 C C 7 7 C 7 .7. .7. .J-. < < < < ° ,... 3 < .7. .7-. < ` 3 3 3 ` < < < < N C) C) C) o C) N a).000000 C) C) C) 0 N N N () C) o () C) (n Cn Cn Cn (n o m (n CO Cn Cn Cn Cn (n Cn Cn (n m CD m cn Cn (n (n Cl) (n V Cn V m O m O Cn A o O (T W (n m M W m W m N Cn Cn (n cn (n W (n V m O Cn N Cn N m O O O W A (n W A V m Cn W V V V N CO V Cn Cn m x A N W 7 W N N N N -CO A N o N N m N W W V V m V Co CO O o Cn A Cn (D A A 3= y V V A (n N O W A N A (n Cn Cn o m A W m W W w W W V W m W m V Co O V A A N W W cn N x O 0 v Cn N A V A 7 A A j W W N A A o Cn W W N N f N) 0 (n W � CII () W W W W W o A O W CD N N o m m O O V W cD Cn (T m W V V V W V m W CD o w o W V o (O 0) Cn A Cn A o o W cn O< C WC N N N Iml (n �l m w N o W O J N V W W CD A Cn v cn W m V O m V o N Cn N v cn W O Co w V W� V V o co co co o W W G (D N c cD — O W Cn Cn o W W (n N W o o (D N (n A A m W C N Z O o O o O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O . O O O O O � V (n V V A W m W W W N A -� A W W W V A— N W Cn A A cD V Cn m W N m A m Cn (n Cn (n V m Cn W m o V V m N W (n < (n C) O O O o O J N O O O O O o O O o o O O O O O O o A O A O CWC m N N N) Cn N A A A A CD (n -� W N N N O o V N A W N w Cn m A CJt N w V W W A N A N) (n V W N A m (n G C77 O pD N V o W m co m W w in A W (n o CD V A W m W Cn W (D W O Cn N O O o N o W (; A co o W y O co m V N N V o W o m V m A o O Cn 0) W O W W W W W N m V m N O O w N 0 (n 2 j m A Cp Cn W A (O o (n V A O co A m C. N V m A o Co W O V V Cn V (n m (n W Cn N A N m cD W V V O Cn CD A m C" CO O W o A(D A m V m N O V W m < pr T W N 7 N N N N 0 7C' N _ (n N W W N CO O Cn < N OD CD W V O W W W m o m Cn (n A V V W W W o CD CW V (n W W W m N W W V k 0 � J co (D (o � V w Cn W o N)� W o W V Cn N m W A Cn N) O m m o WV w W A Cn co V N O V A O W N O CO o A o 14 W (D o y a n .a Q N B. Provide a projection of vehicle trips expected to be generated by this development. State all standards and assumptions used, including trip end generation rates by land use types, sources of data, modal split, persons per vehicle, etc., as appropriate. The acceptable methodology to be used for projecting trip generation (including the Florida Standard Urban Model Structure or the Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation rates) shall be determined at the pre - application conference stage. Response: The traffic generation estimate for the Hacienda Lakes DRI is summarized in Table 21 -2. The trip generation estimate was based on fitted -curve equations or average trip generation rates obtained from Trip Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th edition, 2008), as indicated in Table 21 -2. Whenever available, the fitted -curve equations were used. If a fitted - curve equation was not available for a particular land use or time period, then the average rates were used. C. Estimate the internal /external split for the generated trips at the end of each phase of development as identified in (B) above. Use the format below and include a discussion Q of what aspects of the development (i.e. provision of on -site shopping and recreation facilities, on -site employment opportunities, etc.) will account for this internal /external split. Provide supporting documentation showing how splits were estimated, such as the results of the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model Structure (FSUTMS) model application. Describe the extent to which the proposed design and land use mix will foster a more cohesive, internally supported project. Response: As shown in Table 21 -2, the Hacienda Lakes DRI will consist of a mix of mutually - supporting land uses that provide opportunities for trips generated by one land use component to be satisfied by another. Therefore, some trips will occur within the site and need not travel on public roads adjacent to the site. Internal capture between residential, commercial, and office land uses were estimated using procedures and rates identified in the Trip Generation Handbook (ITE, June 2004). A summary of the estimated trip interchanges between on -site land uses is provided in Appendix 21 -F. Overall, the internal capture estimates resulted in PM peak hour external trips being reduced to approximately 85 percent of the total vehicle trip end generation reported in Table 21 -2. Table 21- 3 summarizes the internal capture and pass -by capture estimates. Hacienda Lakes is estimated to generate 26,087 net external daily, and 2,344 net external p.m. ® peak hour trip -ends. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 6 N �91 y N W N 0 i (D (D .Q f6 M N_ � CA N N 00 O O N N le N �'' M O O MIT O IT N r- O M P r N N N N LO T CD M F M N N 3 +' 0 1` V O N r- I` It O M�t w N N 00 0 N 1` CD M N O O w N N M N O Y T T T R 0) IL 2 C CD M G M 1- N M (D LO Cfl N LO c O LO It O � It � O 0) Cl CD N a — T d' T T R t` N O T O_ Cfl M M M N 00 CD !Z O IT _O O N N M CND LO Ln It •� ~ r r r H O 7 Ln CO 00 � (D r- M N N O = 0 LO V CA LO M CD CD M N N - - - T O O In 01 T O) T R d a C _ N LO It LO N LO LO M N CD M M LO O V O M O N M ti Cl) Q T V V I- L >+ C. LO 0) (.0 N CY) N LO O LO LO M O) h • - O co M co Co -q M Cfl 00 M M N M 00 O f� M CN CD O M CD 00 O O 00 O> T N N N N CO N Cs Cl 00 N CD N Q Q C E� 2 N a s to O O C o-It 'IT v0M000LO M N N O r N M X K L w (d o U) 3 M H to O 0) Z 0 O ~ H > UUUUUUUU�Ua) --• > w > ii iL iL iL ii i2 ii iL Q iL Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o _0 _o _o 04 C\l O N N N N N N N 00 h h M O N C O 0) rn w O N 3 00 N O 7 7 7 t O O O C O C S S S O m :3 OL O t t L - N @ O ca U O U O 0 Cl 0 U) U > > > L) w t m w C E d) 0) d) 0) d) .Q m (0 (n 0) J'0 V V s a� m L) w0) 5 am a n Co N N O O O- a OL C = 0) O 7 O .0 .0 QQ(nQ(nQ(nU)CD2S <n a Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 7 Table 21 -3a Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate Daily Internal Capture Matrix internal capture = 4104 Capture Rate = 14.5% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 28,139 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 8018 Gross Trips (outbound) 8017 Internal Capture (inbound) 1150 Internal Capture (outbound) 1204 External Trips (inbound) 6868 External Trips (outbound) 6813 External Trips (total) 13681 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 2052 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 1026 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 1026 Net External = 26,087 Q: 2005 050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA,Subtask 32 DR] ADA Support \Hearings\Q21 ,Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 8 Shopping Residential Center Office Hotel Total In Out In I Out In Out In Out 6,800 6,800 8,018 8,017 1,226 1,227 418 417 In 6,800 882 25 0 907 Residential Out 6,800 722 0 0 722 Shopping In 8,018 722 270 158 1,150 Center Out 8,017 882 184 138 1,204 Office In 1 1,226 0 184 0 184 Out 1,227 25 270 13 308 In 418 0 138 13 151 Hotel Out 417 0 158 0 158 Total In 16,462 Out 16,461 internal capture = 4104 Capture Rate = 14.5% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 28,139 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 8018 Gross Trips (outbound) 8017 Internal Capture (inbound) 1150 Internal Capture (outbound) 1204 External Trips (inbound) 6868 External Trips (outbound) 6813 External Trips (total) 13681 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 2052 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 1026 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 1026 Net External = 26,087 Q: 2005 050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA,Subtask 32 DR] ADA Support \Hearings\Q21 ,Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 8 Ev Table 21 -3b Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate AM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix internal capture = U4 Capture Rate = 5.8% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 1,528 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 205 Gross Trips (outbound) 131 Internal Capture (inbound) 25 Internal Capture (outbound) 22 External Trips (inbound) 180 External Trips (outbound) 109 External Trips (total) 289 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 72 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 36 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 36 Net External = 1,456 Q: 2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 9 Residential Shopping Center Office In Out 145 33 Hotel In Out 36 23 Total In Out In Out 234 815 205 131 Residential In 234 9 0 0 9 Out 815 10 0 0 10 Shopping Center In 205 10 7 8 25 Out 131 9 4 9 22 Office In 1 145 0 4 0 4 Out 33 0 7 0 7 Hotel In 36 0 9 0 9 Out 231 0 8 0 8 Total In 620 Out 1,002 internal capture = U4 Capture Rate = 5.8% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 1,528 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 205 Gross Trips (outbound) 131 Internal Capture (inbound) 25 Internal Capture (outbound) 22 External Trips (inbound) 180 External Trips (outbound) 109 External Trips (total) 289 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 72 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 36 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 36 Net External = 1,456 Q: 2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 9 .7 Table 21 -3c Internal Capture and Pass -By Capture Estimate PM PK Hour Internal Capture Matrix internal Lapture = 4bU Capture Rate = 14.7% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 2,672 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 756 Gross Trips (outbound) 786 Internal Capture (inbound) 103 Internal Capture (outbound) 123 External Trips (inbound) 653 External Trips (outbound) 663 External Trips (total) 1316 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 328 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 164 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 164 Net External = 2,344 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI. - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Supportu-/earings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 10 Gross Trips Residential Shopping Center Office In Out 51 147 Hotel In Out 42 38 Total In Out In I Out 841 471 756 786 Residential In 841 94 3 0 97 Out 471 68 0 0 68 Shopping Center In 756 68 15 20 103 Out 786 94 16 13 123 Office In 51 0 16 0 16 Out 1471 3 15 1 19 Hotel In 42 0 13 1 14 Out 38 0 20 0 20 Total In 1,690 Out 1,442 internal Lapture = 4bU Capture Rate = 14.7% Pass -by Trips Estimate Gross External = 2,672 Shopping Center Gross Trips (inbound) 756 Gross Trips (outbound) 786 Internal Capture (inbound) 103 Internal Capture (outbound) 123 External Trips (inbound) 653 External Trips (outbound) 663 External Trips (total) 1316 Pass -By Capture = 25% Pass -By Trips 328 Pass -By Trips (inbound) 164 Pass -By Trips (outbound) 164 Net External = 2,344 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI. - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Supportu-/earings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 10 D. Provide a projection of total peak hour directional traffic, with the DRI, on the highway network within the study area at the end of each phase of development. If these projections are based on a validated FSUTMS model, state the source, date, and network of the model and of the TAZ projections. If no standard model is available or some other model or procedure is used, describe it in detail and include documentation showing its validity. Describe the procedure used to estimate and distribute traffic with full DRI development in subzones at build out and at interim phase -end years. These assignments may reflect the effects of any new road or improvements which are programmed in adopted capital improvements programs and/or comprehensive plans to be constructed during the DRI construction; however, the inclusion of such roads should be clearly identified. Show these link projections on maps or tables of the study area network, one map or table for each phase -end year. Describe how these conclusions were reached. Response: Year 2019 PM peak hour traffic volumes on the 2012 existing plus committed roadway network were estimated using the FSUTMS Model for the Collier County MPO provided to the applicant's consultant on January 21, 2010. Socio- economic data projections corresponding to the mid -range population projections of the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research for 2019 were provided with the model set. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic volumes and background traffic volumes were identified using the "select zone" assignment procedures of the FSUTMS model. 2019 daily background AADT volumes were forecasted by: (a) subtracting the Hacienda Lakes select -zone traffic volumes from the total traffic volumes, (b) interpolating between 2000 validation model volumes and the 2019 volumes to estimate 2009 model peak season volumes, (c) determining the annual traffic growth rate from 2009 to 2019 based on the model volumes above for a "Method A" estimate, (d) determining the difference in 2019 and 2009 model -based volumes (taking into consideration the MOCF of 0.85) to be used for a "Method B" estimate, (e) applying the growth rate and the volume difference to the actual 2009 AADT counts to create two ( "Method A" and "Method B ") estimates of 2019 AADT, (f j examining the differences between the Method A and Method B estimates and usually averaging the two to develop a 2019 background AADT estimate. Averaging was chosen in most cases because the two methods produced very similar volumes. For I- 75, a two percent per year annual growth rate was applied per FDOT direction, as the model -based methods resulted in a lower growth rate. On U.S. 41 east of C.R. 951, the higher, difference method (Method B) was applied because Method A seemed to produce low estimates of growth. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 11 QThe segment- specific volumes were then reviewed on an area -wide basis by computing the vehicle -miles of travel on the study network. The model -based travel growth estimates indicate that an annual VMT growth rate of 37,513 daily vmt per year can be expected, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI has used an annual VMT growth rate of 40,674 daily vmt per year. The model -based growth rate also indicates that the 2019 study network vmt will be 1.482 times the 2009 study network vmt, and the Hacienda Lakes DRI has estimated the 2019 study network vmt will be 1.494 times the 2009 vmt. Thus, the background traffic growth rates used in this analysis are consistent with those of the BEBR mid -range forecasts, as incorporated into Collier County's travel demand model. This information is presented and summarized in Table 21 -4. The resulting overall background traffic annual growth rate on the study network between 2009 and 2019 is 4.0 percent per year. On two road segments of the Tamiami Trail (US 41) -- from Davis Blvd. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. -- background traffic growth rates of 1.5 and 1.0 percent per year, less than the two percent per year FDOT guideline, resulted from the analysis procedure. This area of Collier County is somewhat built -out, and higher existing volumes in the denominator of the growth rate computation result in and lower growth rate percentages. Analysis of the historic trend in traffic counts on this section of US 41, provided in Appendix 21 -G, indicate a 15 -year trend rate of 1.5 percent per year, supporting the lower background traffic growth rate. Thus the growth rate used Qin this analysis is reasonable. The resulting background AADT volumes were converted to PM peak -hour, peak season background traffic volumes using the appropriate "K100" (for SIS roads) or "K250 "(for non -SIS roads), and "D" factors, as identified in Table 21 -5. The peak direction of background traffic on each segment was based on existing traffic flow patterns. Hacienda Lakes DRI trips on each road segment were identified using a "selected zone" FSUTMS model traffic assignment procedure, which tracks the trips generated by the group of TAZ's in which the Hacienda Lakes DRI was isolated. The resulting distribution of external Hacienda Lakes DRI trips from the model was applied to the ITE -based trip generation estimate to estimate the PM peak hour Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic. PM peak hour background traffic volumes were added to PM peak hour DRI traffic volumes to estimate total traffic volumes for the 2019 PM peak hour. Background traffic volumes and Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic assignments for 2019 are indicated in Table 21 -5. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Supporl\Hearings \Q21 \Q2l Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 12 E. Assign the trips generated by this development as shown in (B) and (C) above and show, on separate maps or tables for each phase -end year, the DRI traffic on each link of the then - existing network within the study area. Include peak -hour directional trips. If local data is available, compare average trip lengths by purpose for the project and local jurisdiction. For the year of build out, and at the end of each phase, estimate the percent impact, in terms of peak hour directional DRI trips /total peak hour directional trips and in terms of peak hour directional DRI trips /existing peak hour service volume for desired LOS, on each regionally significant roadway in the study area. Identify facility type, number of lanes and projected signal locations for the regionally significant roads. Response: DRI project traffic was distributed and assigned to the study network by Collier County's adopted FSUTMS transportation systems planning model, as described above. The Hacienda Lakes DRI traffic assignment is indicated in Table 21 -6. During the traffic assignment step, capture of trips from Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) adjacent to the commercial component of the site was considered. For the PM peak hour, the resulting pass - by capture estimate using ITE procedure was 328 trip -ends, or 164 trips, which would be approximately 4.1 percent of the future background traffic on Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951), adhering to the "less than 10 percent" limit agreed to during methodology discussions. The number of net new external PM peak hour vehicle trips attributable to the Hacienda Lakes DRI assigned to the road network was 2,344 trips (1,296 inbound, 1,048 outbound). Q:\2005\050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP,0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q21 ,Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg. 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 x v r 3 -o c 0 0 z m b 0 W N O Y N b UQ OD v 6) A N -� O CD CD Q a m ° 0 0 (D ZT N) NO it it (D CD cn (vn D j 0 II < C:) (fl (fl N D D 0 0 (D II D D co (D < (D II II C x 0 N) 0 < °- (z o CD 0 0 (fl CD -n0>,> Fl > + x < v N x (D o + o O v + (O D C7 3. N 7 TI C m o 7 ' 3 C O (7 v- D G) O C (n N D o � m CD C2 O o O D C v D (D G 3 x 7 Iv0o C3 n D N TI O II p CO D V C O (n m (D 0 3 v (D S O it m N O_ O D D D m 3 fU (D O 9 9 < —cncn O L O Q to O O O _ CD CD CD CD 2) N eT 2) rN-r O to fly N to W cr Cl -I < j CO %ill CD CD CD < 3 O 7 3 CD CD O n N rF O S CD (D O Q CD CD N O j CO ' ► (DD 0 I CD m f11 cC O A c�D tto M O o B < 0 n rr N << CD (Q O O to D. (D .r w O Z O < cn V O O (D (D (D (D O N (D (D (n a1 0 � v v 3 CD N CD v 3 t w < < V% w Qa� Q <. 0 O O D O M < c m _ cn D O n (D Q (? CD O v m D N 3 z) 0 < O Q — (D C O fU V (n O CD A j C) n CO O O A W v v (n (n O O IF � 7 A (O O co J (D W N A N N 0 —cncn cncncnnn nnno Q. Q��� O O 0 O O a O 0 O O O v 3 3 3 3 3 v Cv (D (D O (D O O O O O O (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (n v v 3 v 3 v 3 v 3 ov3Gov Qa� ��mmmmmmmm m v nv) m (1 C1 (D_ O_ c- n o n o n n 6 n m m m m m v m m 0 0 0 0 x ;u �a �u �o �a Za '�a v cn v v) v cn v O Cl) < °' ;� ;K- co (O (D co (D cc (fl cc cn Cn j cn cn ()I CP cn Q Q a a G) C) D 0) G) (n Z7 C) C Q w C CD Z7 0— v G) w FD O — - a< N O 0 v iz w v x o 0 c v LU < < v x O 0 `< fU O Q< Sv cn o 2- Q(D O m Cll Q v cD O (nn Q CD ( o 3 N m A v (O v A n CD cn O (D C O v(D m oo Q W � CD a� � v� V W x `G < d m n3i o << G) (Q O d 3 O ZJ O (D (D ZJ Q O (D < WQ� N N o�� m (D �] a T 3 N CO Q < < 3 m O m Q (n G) T7 D n Z7 (n C) (n (7 n cn cn 1 C L7 D — G) G) n x Q) v -a o v A oc v �. 5 (n Q 15. � a v (p _1 (D (D Co O N C CD A iv O v (D A C7 m (n M Z O O � T CD c m cn A Cn m `< 3 m 0)_ (D C C) < m �--� m v v < U v x Q < ° v v m v v Q c v v< O< 3 �7 a m CD< v 3 x< v Q v CD CD Q o _ _ v ° m Zo (D m cn v = v -0 -1 O v m m (z m m 3 3 3 a < Q Q< 3 0 0 �' 0 � co O N Cn N A O 6) 0 0 O N V N O N W N O W IV W N N N N O N (n IV Cn W N O N O N O Co N C A O U) CO 00 V O CO CO (r N A V — WC'n m W m CD A Cn V N J CO p G O1 O A A co O A m J 00 co A J N O CC A J J V CO Cn O A W OD CO co N� V 6) CO N N CO CU CO W O O C o m U) m A A N N N N N W Cn m Cn A A A A V W W A W N O Cep co W A W J W O N (n Cn co -' O Cn Cn A N W N N W cc m O O O V A— O (D m J Cfl 00 A O co A V W N -� Cn O co co O O W W J to O N W Cn J O Cn J A Cn (0 CO A R N V N W V J co O W N O W (o (D O m O J O W m m (n CD W N A Cn N W W C) (n Cn OD Cn �p 'S W N O N 00 V A 7 co cn J A N co N W O W W W W cn N N A IV (b N O N W 0 N 4) C 0 CD W A O CD O Sll O) W O W IV A O m co J m O O O� CO A f„'D CD O. .+ p CD i' (D W O A O CO N W A O A (b Cn Ul A -' W O m O CO IV N V V O W J O m A (fl W O A O A 6) O O O A O co W Cn V O. (D 0 j 6) Cn U'i O A OO Cn W N CD Cn W W N W W N N A O N CW J a N A CD 6 (n m= W m co V A O N W d7 V N J V N N O C) O O 3 o 0 o 8 0 o � 0 v 8 0 8 0 o 8 0 o 8 0 o �� 0 0 o 8 0 o 8 0 o 0 8 0 o 8 0 o (� m �y C S O Cn Cn N A CO (n W N 90 Cn W W N W W N N A 6) N W V d 0 j CL O C N A o 0 cn O o CU m Cn o (D J 0 A W 0 N 0 W W 0 J 0 N 0 V 0 J 0 N N 0 co 0 a7 O 0 .•' O (D C (% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o D1 N S Q 0 CD C. DD s co cc (fl (n Cn W W W CO Cn A CO A O W O V V Co N CT co W v N O W A O (b O O O O O J O Cn W O J O C O O CA a7 Cn J O W •7• CD -i m V A W N O W Cn O A Cn CO N V N W 6) O� Ul CJ7 N N O -� O V CO A N O QO N V W V W 00 V A J Cn co W W O) N CD A A ,p A (,,) O (,,) N O W N (b N -� W N N O CD N N( N 0 N CO CD N O W W W W A N N M N O) N O n N W W O W (n CD (n A N 00 N_ 00 m O O O N N O) co O W co m p (n UOi W O A C) CD OJ Ul V W CO V J A W O O Cn CO (fl (D O y J CT J A W W Cn W (fl 7 A CO -� Cn O -' CO N W V N (fl W O W W W m N Ui Cl) 6) A N A N Cn O co (n W A W (T W A m D O J CO m— O i)1 O J co -' W N N A O N -� J O O Cn W N A u S O J W N (fl Ul W 00 V O O W co J co O W M V CD co OD co O A CO Cn N W W W J Cn QO W O W O W N N CO co CO W co O. N CD A W N A O W C) W (.n W V A O V N O CO N J J W C) W A A W W O N J W V A O A O W O W A W W W Cn W A W ,O„ CD O J A U) Cn -8 O A A co W J CO Cn W co co J O 00 N 6) m V N a S O D Av W N O O O A O (n N A Cn (D co Cn Cn 6) cc (0 (fl V A O W N O O O CO N A O -� N A N U) J A V A A N (n O V co N O N Q A w W W A N --+ N W W A W N W A A (n W W W W y A W (D co Cn co V J 90 J O N J d1 V -� O Cn A O A fD O J J co W O (A Cn O_ U) O_ (n N A N A A W O O O W OW _O N N OW � N M O O W A N (n 00 O (n CO CD W O N N N N j CT -� N A CD CA A N CO Cn A A W W CO N N A CA N W O A -� V O N Cn O W O V N -P. O co co (n Cn W O co Cn O 7 C a c 0 0 0 0 0 0 9) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o C d r+ CD O) CO =r m m Z Z z Z O O O O O O M 3 (D (D (D (D y 3 W O J O N — W N O O O N W O O W O O N O -- -� O Crp C9 N W O O co J A m W O A W V O W (fl N W O CO (fl V 3 C) N V (O 6) O Cn Cn O Cn O O A Cn A A W QD N O W O) W W J A d7 Cn J V Cn A W J O N OJ N O Cn C N A co W N p Of O CL )o O J (n O W W J Cn Cn W A V cn — N A OD W O O N O — (D N 11 Cn N W N A W 00 A N V O W (T 6) W � A W 6) — m (fl A A C) Cn (fl U O V N CO m J V CO C.O p CL o (D N O IZ J 4 W N A Cn A V (o N (n V 00 CO V M A W W C) CA OD -� O N A C) J 6) N OD W A O (0 Cn W W O N W Cn (n (n co W C) N W C) -� -n 71 CD O CD O) N V CO N Cn C) A (D N (b O Cn U) W W W O C) C) (.0 'J1 O A O O -� A O QO N co J N O N A J N O C) (D W O Cn O P (D co N CU W C0 J CY) — 00 W C) O) — CD m Cn W A (n O V M 00 O CO DDD P P O V N O V A W OD O V W A (T O Cn O N W 00 V OD O N Cn V O W O J W Cn W (A cn (n A CD .n J T W Cn O O O m O 0) V N Cn 47 A N O W 07 W O N C) W Cn Cn A (fl N J W V cn OO m Cn (n A O A CO N W O A W A W A A m G y V CO m co J A O O V U) Cn A W— OD CO O J N W Cn N CD W W V N m t9 W A N W W N W N A (n N m J m A (O W -� (n J N N N W m O N -� W N J O O -� A W Co O N N Cn W m Cn C) O N p Q W Cn Cn O m J N co (n A A A co — (o Cn N ' m N O A W tD y A O J O O O O A CA CO N N O J W Cn CO CO W (n W co OD N N co CO O- (T O A A O (T O C) cn N A J m O W W J O V N 01 A O O A W N N 0 m q N 0 O 0 0 0 S v Y 3 '0 C O a a �o 0 0 0 W N Y a N -1 -� - cn to x A ;] A S Z1 to O to C) 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 o 3 3 3 3 3 ��" ?? _a _a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m Un w w N 0 0 10 N N mD N N N N N w w w w w 3 3 3 3 3 N w 0 N 'm v fw/, a n m m m W W CD CO W W W W d m' <an<a n<n nann w w c)nTouwwwT m m m m m 3 m W 0 3 3 0 0 3 O A Z A A A U U O N N N (w/1 x< 0 F F F F fp (O 10 CO (O N (O fD w D O O G) cn w 0 iSl ;0 cn a C) J C O C cn N �n r J K --I J :2 C cn o » a O <, m O C) a N v m n w ' (D O 5. n 0 J W O N O A N O N w N A ' (D N N m (n (D > O A O W n A n co 3 C (D N a C C F N W �' d JJ °_ A N Zj n N m Q 3 Q' a m a m tD CL Z7 n°< n N w = Z7 °- f w W F w F -4 m o x 3 n » nG7�o�D0 x w Cl) ODcn A 0 o 0�m c > v m o cmv f o0,0 a <_. O' a 0 w F 0 w m m m v ? >> N w N A N Cf) m N N Z A m .O. Cr) w W (p c] W << m W Ax a n= O m Q 0 l m1 �] °- c F w <D °' m n n n CD CD N pmJi 3 J< w n 3 3 m n< F 3 o 3 o n n 3 0 0 3 a n F n r m c C c 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m n N N O O W O O N N W O O m J ry t0 m 3+ A m v p N V O N O O W O O m O m m O V (P A m W O O A O A V W J A A O W (O W m N O m m W W ?? 0 C) 0 C) m m 0 m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m m 0 0 0 0 r 0 a N cn n cn n n n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn p� p� p pj 9 C C C c C c C C w m w w w w w w w w w w N N (D N (D m ti O J O> J J m N N N 9 m m m m m m (D C D C 3 D D S D 3 D D 3 D 3 D D D .1 a. D 3 D D 3 D D 3 S ^. D D 3 D D S D D S 3 D C) A 3 y 0 [MM., > >>1> ddd N C C C C- C D d Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q I. J w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w m y W N W W W W N N N N N N W W W W N N N O O O N J J N N N W N (0 -+ (T 0 O W 0 0 m j N N 0 O A IN 0 0 N m 0 O # (VT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 0 o o 0 0 °0 3 m0 w o o O o o 0 o C) a o O O 0 C) o o C) C) O o C) a o O O o 0 0 0 o m w. a F F N F O. F fD F (D F (D N (� (D N F (D F F (D F F N (V 0 (n Cwi C) C) n C) C) 0 0 r ni O n C) O o C) 0 C) C) n 0 0 0 C) n O O n 0 O o C) C) 0 0 C) O 0 0 0 C) 0 0 C) 0 0 o r 0 O c �. 0 0 0 c 3 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c (n > > > > = m > > > > > > > > > > > > > (n m D D D D D D D D D D D D I D D D D D D D D D D n Q C C_ C_ c_ C_ C_ C_ c C_ C_ c_ C_ C c_ C_ c c_ 0 <. O A T7 A A Z7 T1 A T1 A A T] A ZJ x7 A ,l7 0 O F C F A W W W N W N O N t0 N N N m m 8 N m m W W W W A W m W (p O V A (0 m {y A O CJ( (D N A m N m m W� m (P 00 m A m V (0 V m V m m V V A W m m (0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -n 0 0 0 o O o o 0 0 0 to Oklpkk mo mo o m0 o mo m m0 mo o m0 m m O m cn cn m O o m J m mn m m m mn m m m m m cn m m m cn cn m m m cn m m m cn m m mn o m x H 0 0 0 HPI-ld- m mmm�(ncnmmm��mzzzzzzzzzzz m m C:;) m (p .7 W W W Q) W W W W p7 QJ W W- W W W W W W W W W W F S w w O o O O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O N 6 (� (D (D N (U (ZD N (D (FD F (CD N N N N O (] 0 Q > 0 (] (7 () [7 C) 0 0 0 0 () [] C) �) C) () �) �) �) () �) (n y °c > °c °c > 0 °c °c > >_ C) m Cf) 0 m c >_ 0 c >_ 0 0 0 c c c >_ > > 0 0 c c > >_ 0 0 c c > > 0 m c > m > > > > > n w v d v C) U) C) 0 (n cn C) O (n n w o m o3i 0 m (n 0 cn 0 0 0 n n n 0 O n n 0 n n n h cn m m m cc n) n n 0 c to n C) n m V mmmcn° J O O A° mcn��mm W m mm m N 0+m (T (P W mmmv+m J O N N O O O m A m m A J m m m V V J N W V m m A W t0 A W m (P W O W A J J N m 0 N m m V W W O N W V N W m V A (T W (P W W A m W D N A p A 0, m 0 0 0 W 0 G O -1-1- - N W W W N W W W m W W W W F C= W A m m m A J N m W m A (P (0 (P O m N V V m J V m J O O (T W m N (T W m t0 O m m V W 0 m N A m A N m 3 W w O A W O V m U m m m m A 0 m W W N O W W m W N W A O D N N N N N N N W N N Z W O w C F N m V m O (TI J 0 2 n O t0 m m N m O N (T O O N O O N N A A O W O (P t0 O N (D W O E W 0 --i c CA N r m fl V J O O A m0 N m0 A J J J m O O W m m O A J J A N N W A W m N N O W O m m� N m V m N V V (0 �� m m U( J A m O N m O W O (0 m m O O 0 0 A A m V A A m A m N N W ncnmmmmmmzzzzz n(n n(n (f) om W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W co W F _O � N ID Z W A (T m 0 m O A V A m 0 0 0 (NT W N (WT( O A (NI( W A O m J N O O m W i= d C En ca A m m W m O (0 W A N m0 V (P m m (0 m o N (AT W m O m V ca V O m (T W N (T W N A m m N -+ W A W J A m A V W m Z m A m 0 W N j O N m V J (T W A W m W N W 1 N O m O O N O W N m W (0 m V m m m N O O 0 m J m m m w O L m w m0 m� (P N m N A 1-1810 J O t0 W O m A� m W m O CI( O N W C � + p w Cl) m m m A O V A O N (D V 0) A m a V O N N m O m m A J A m W W A m N A m ^ O n W m A m m m W (0 �I m m j m V 8 O ON O (O m m al W N N A O O m A N m N m 0 m V m 0 CD W 10 O A m W G_ (n 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W V J m m m (T m m W ON A (P OW m A (T (n O m0 V A 0 m m 0 t0 (P m m (P O m O O N m N A O CP m V 0 (mn W m m m m W Z { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { { W U) CD N m CD N N m m N N m m N N m m N N m m N N m m N N 0 CD N N m w N N m m N N m m N N m m N N M m N N m N mW J { { {(pp { Z ( {(pp { { CD { { CD Z { w { { ( {(pp CD { { CD { { { { CD ( {p { Z � W � O w (p{(p N N N ( N CD O N N N N 0 (/( ((D N N N N N N ((/D O 'J to Z z z z z z z z m z zlziziziz z z z z z z z z C.0 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 IT C) Q W C � ' D (n Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z z Z � CL 0 LOZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 J O i^ 0 O O Vi cx r <D O W n Df y y A 8 'o 0 0 O 5 A' m x C d 0 d a e K d a x A W N O N `d (1G CD CD (D N (Q N 7 A CL N y N 7 w O d a c m n d N UDC 7 3 (D CD x m 3 v 0 m CL v CD 0 N (D c 0 3 CD S S (D �.7 (D 0 0 O d 7 O s CD 3 0 CL CD (D x v v N N 3 (D 7 cn i d C1 a_ N N W W A W 01 G1 O O O O O a n O n O n O o n d 0 v 0 v 0 v 0 v O O v v C 3 d 3 d 3 d 3 v 3 v _3 d 3 d 3 v 3 d 3 0 n �! Cn Gf V Cn d d d 0 3 7 v (D v 7 .+ .' 0 .� ,. d d O. O O v C _n O (D 5 N 7?> o d 0 d 0< o d (D 0 p (p O (D tD tp 0 (1 0 0 M 0 N N N N N N fn F, 3 d 3 d d 3 D) v 3. d 3 v 3 v 3 v �. m d d W W W 0 W 0 0 0 a a n ZJ W G7 O N� Ll a (r to N j W W W W W W W W �° W W o W 0 W 0 o W W n co 3 _3. N T d Q v d Q v 0 m F W 0 v F 0 w 0 �J n 1D d (D L7 d (D v d < O. f1 < < O. < n t1 < < n < 6. < n d n N CL - ___ N - fU -__ to d N -. -- -. 7 m 0°1 'm W W 3 3 3 3 F o o o n n 0 A O N d m d m d m N m d m d N N A x W d O Q 7t' O 7C O O A A A� A .-. N N y .-• y y '. n Q. i7 m X M VOi N (0J1 tJl N N N CA O. 0. n C O 7 .Zl (n ci 0 -i A D - O G7 (� O m !n G7 G7 N (� n C !o O C d V< O v v d -1 O C V) r 0 m ,d, r O 0— d <. v° °� 0 G7 0 ��� O f1 (o d v n� O F D C v X d p �. Dl 5. 00 O p �] G o. M C 7 4151 .mod. �. N 7 d Cn j n <. N j 7 `< N 7 (D Q ° v (D j �.j" ',� M 0 cQ (D (D O "' y (� ID 7 fD W C J,7 CO d .. O m N W d W `< 3 A d co y Zl z W S ry W 0 G) W— .d.� (0p .ii ii C N 3 N !/1 W V j cii W 6. '� a W v W O n :il n v m v d (D W W v .:7 _W G (D 'n v < < iii O N O d n C) fu < D. d W d d O 7 n< n Q 7 v O_ 0 1 iLl O' c d A �< d < O. 11 < O. O O y v 3 W Jc 0 .Z1 C < O. o. o 6 Q m (D d ZJ < (D p. d 3 8 7 6 d � v d (D G CD A N v N �7 O. N n ti d d ff. m C m W n 3 3 �s W W° W < W < W < 3 0 `n o 3 0 n 3 o n c < n a O n 0 O � a r a � C v v O -- A d- D C N G) 0 --{ v m N n p C) p 0 A d (n 7J v M O n w d 0 O n S y ti d r' < n O n 0 n O (n v - v n° d -� v v 3 d 3 d -+ ° << C N r M° r Q- < N° 0 O 1D -0 m n .�J p_ cn (� C � '0 D < N 7 N r m N °' y - (D- w 0 < O 0 n 3 fU O = N M W D Cl a (D A ° t0 y c 7 d W d o __= N (D (D 7 N 0 3. N O >> try °.: � � < 0 tD n N N Z n CD D 3 T'n i0 o v .< fD � o � co n co m 7 y 10D co O M 0 N 3 .i p7 N- 3 n W y A 0 , (1 7 Uf � W d „� co (D y A Q W d N W W W W 71 3 — w_ N d 0 1p A L2. C C 0 7 d d W < �" O fii CO < D- (D 'm n co v W d O n .ZJ n n o d < W d A< a sl T O pl F d v d d < Q <<< d n n tS v v. 7 Q :' .i'1 n d F .0 d O_ d p_ W 71 0- 3 A n a a _ v m< co = N D1 ? `D N d Q n n ci °i n W 'O y a w �J < 11 O. _ d 3 w m < d 3< W x- W � n W << W W ?1 A ;u W m D> n. ° 7c' x g 3 3 A n N a 3 n `L n o a (0 m n n m �< 3 z ° o 0 " o X, Ir a a � n r m d N N N N N m m O1 to W W m A A 6� T O) Q W Q m m D W A Q O A Q A O A Q A Q A D A D A O A D m O m D m O m D A 0 A A O A Q m O Ol D m O m Q m O A Q A A O A 0 to Q m 0 A 0 A 0 A 0 m 0 7+ � n C C C C C D O Q Q O 0 0 m m r N O N A V W N O) N m N O O W (T O O A J t0 V A co W O O (0 (0 N (D co A 0 O W 0 N A O W A V O W A O V A W O W O W W O (O N N N O O W W m m -i O W tD W A V -� V m � V m m m ID Cn m -' O O 0 O m 3 + W w W N V (O W b 0 J Cn W 0 0 0 Ul 0 0 0 0 ON O 0 A�� 0 m O V 0 S i n V v 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 m m m m m 0 0 v 0 m m m m O Q 00 0,i '..0 0 00 0 r a N O 1-1-1-1-Im m m IMIMIMI m n 0 0 m m m C C) N N N (n (n o (n N (n nnnnnn O C O C o C 0 C 0 0 C C 0 C n013,010 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 nnn C 0 C 0 C n 0 C nn�rn� 0 C 0 C v d d d !v d d d d tv d d v d v v v v dso d d fl1 v C 7 N d v 7 7 >> 7 » 7 7 7 7 7 .7. N N 0 D N N 0 0 O 0 N ' (p (D 1D N tD 0 (D (D K N tD M K � ,� .� 1L `G < D D D D D » D D D D D D 7 D a D D D D C D .: D D D D .i D .i. D .Z D .i D D .Z D a. D .1.. D D D 7 D .�-• n A 0 (�� C Ic- C 3 Ic n(7nnn(�nn� lz� 1't� 0 0 f ID .Z nn(�nC1C1 .i .1.. .�+ ri .Z C7 .� n(7nn(�(�(�n(� ,� .i T O w nnnnnnnnnn(� '.nnnn n N N n .O.• jV fJ N N d N IV N C C --� C C C C C C C C� C C C Q C Q C tT Q C Q' C C O' C 6 C 0 C 0 0 Q Q Q C tT Q Q Q Q a' a Q' Q Q O' Q 6 O' Q C Q y Q Q rS Q Q a N 1:�, 1 a' Q > Q > Q > N N Q ow Q w 7 3 w w 0 6 7 7 7 7 7 J j > > J > > 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 3 0 7 w 7 D > > J 7 0 d 7 7 7 0. 0 0 W W W N W O� W A W W N (° W V (n Cn W N W N W (� W N N -+ W t0 O -� W O (D V Co V Cn A CA t0 W W N N O A N -� N (O N CT N A N O W A Cl O 0 (JT1 N N 0 N N O CT O N O V O O O O O O O O O o O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O O 0 0 A n n ° p° O y p 3 n O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n 0 n� 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 S 0 0 o 0 0 o o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 o 0 n 0 N °o t0. N Col t0 p p 0 n 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 _ 0 _ 0 o o o o O _ O _ o 0 o 0 o( 0 D C) (p D O tD n _ m o o o o m _ _ _ _ (� _ _ o 0 m o 0 m 0 o FD- 0 0 m 0 (� m o m = _ (� _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m Q, _ m - m _ m - m N v ID FD n m n o o m o n n m n n o m n m n n r- r- d o o r m ;; �o O n o n n n n n n n n n n o o 0 o 0 o 0 n 0 o 0 n 0 o 0 n 0 o 0 n 0 n o r N r O n o n n o n 0 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C 0 C o C O C o C O (n O cn O (n 3 0 0 C 0 O > 0 O > 0 C 0 0 C C 0 C 7 0 C 7 0 C 7 0 O O o C 7 O C 7 o C 7 0 C 7 0 C 7 0 C 7 0 C 7 0 C 7 0 C 7 C 3 C 0 C 7 C C C 7 C 7 C 7 C 7 C 7 C 7 O = 3 o 7 7 7 O 7 7 •< O ^" 7 7 7 `G 7 `G 7 ^' 7 .� 7 `< 7 `G 7 `< N d N N 3 K<< 3 K 7 3 K K K K K< `G `G K K K K K ~ K K< 7 0 D D D D D D D D D D D D 7 n p C a 0 D D c D c D D D D D D D c D c D c D c D c D c D c D c D c D D c D c D c D c D c D c D c D c D c D c D C_ 7 CL D C_ D C_ D c_ D c_ c A c �1 c c A c A c c c A c c A c A c 0 0 Q O o <_ c A - A c A c c c A c c A �1 A A �1 �J �7 :U a7 c A A A :V A 0 a .� 0 0 � O w W N O W A J_ W L" N W N A m W W W N pA1 N W O A N N co O O j m N O W A V L, N (N(�� (P (71 V Ol (r V A W A N N N N N W N L" 01 ,N,pp W O V m 10 W N N N (O N N W W 0D Ul A !b p 2' 0 y» (p C.n O O O t0 co N A A A CWD N (WO W N CND V W N N A W-4 A N N W V V O W O (JN W A A W N A O -� m A O co Cn v N + N N O O W A N N O N CD 01 Cn N N W W A O W N W m N V N O N N Cn CD V W 00 (D 0 W A N J W A V. N W -� C 0 .0.. ID C N J m O O Cl O to � m -4 (D (D O O W A W W W N N V W W W O (O V 0 10 0 A 0 CD 0 V 0 W 0 O 0 A 0 V 0 .� W 0 N 0 A 0 CO 0 V 0 A 0 N 0 (D 0 0 W 0 V 0 k V W O W A N N V A 1 O1 O N N N N W m m _ O _ j -+ O N N N W Vf N A W i W O W Ot t0, +)` m W co A O N W N N C 0 (D V O N N O N N A W W N A N cn W D W N O m tO W m V CD O V W Cn O N A j O W A -� V V 0 -4 O v p W W t0 0� N O J A A N 1D V N W N N N N W -� (T W tO W O N 01 (!i Ol W W V A V W W � W °' » 3 W V W W A W N N N m O W W N (O O m O O O W A N tO O W N A to 01 N O -' N O W A W N+ W A W V A A A O N O m W W O N (D C (D N O A N W O p1 W N N -' PI— of 1:- (D A V W W O V N m GJ O N W A A W V W to m N W A _ O m m m A L" A O N m W J O C)1 m m O m = o n p, j O 0 W 0 A 0 m 0 C. 0 0 0 0+ 0 0 W 0 co N 0 0 W o e (D o tp 0 N 0 co 0 CP 0 0 W? 0 0 -+ 0 W W 0 0 -� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o 0 0 0 0 o y fyD C O W A A O O A W N O N A W N N W O O O N W O O O O O O N W A W V m W O W 0. N W W m W N N -' N N 0. A N . W 0 c0 0 Cn G n d m 0 J 0 to 0 N 0 CD 0 m 0 O 0 0 0 W 0 W 0 (O 0 O 0 N e (n o QO e A e W o 0 W 0 N 0 O 0 O 0 V t0 0 0 (0 0 W 0 0 0 CT 0 m 0 A 0 m 0 0 s 0 V 0 tJt 0 0 W 0 W 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z O Z O Z O Z O Z o Z o Z O Z O Z O Z o Z O Z O Z tD O y 0 y 0 y 0 y Z Z O O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z o d y Z O 1D y 0 y 0 0 N N 0 N 0 N Z O Z Z O O Z O' Z O Z O Z O O -H (n -n O O y y y y Q, Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O y y y y Z Z O O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O '< N N '< '< 10/1 10/r < N '� N Z O Z Z O o Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O O .C. 1 � .J Z Z j 0 0 0 Z Z j tD j (D Z Z Z Z j 0 Z j tD 1D Z Z{ 0 0 j 0 j{ 0 0 0 Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O Z O O IzIzIzI- O O N N { N N N j j N N "< N 'G N 'G N C Z CD N O N Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 O Z 0 fn O O O y y y O O y o 0 0 0 0 to O o y O O y N N N N N C - 7 5 Z Z{ tD '« 0 0 0 Z Z 0 '< 0 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z o Z Z O° Z O '{ 0 { 0 Z 0 Z '< O 0 '< 0 '� 0 N 0 N Z 'G 0 0 N Z O Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 m N m N m N m N m N m m N N m N m N 0 N m Z N o Z O Z o Z 0 Z 0 Z 0 0 Z O J O o y N y y N y y y N cn i d C1 a_ 19 F. Based on the assignment of trips as shown in (D) and (E) above, what modifications in the highway network (including intersections) will be necessary at the end of each phase of development, to attain and maintain local and regional level of service standards? For those improvements which will be needed earlier as a result of the DRI, indicate how much earlier. Where applicable, identify Transportation System Management (TSM) alternatives (e.g. signalization, one -way pairs, ride - sharing, etc.) that will be used and any other measures necessary to mitigate other impacts such as increased maintenance due to a large number of truck movements. Response: The total traffic volumes estimated as described above were compared against the roadway service volume estimates of Collier County's Annual Update and Inventory Report to establish a screening of locations where below standard operating conditions are expected, and where development traffic would meet or exceed the thresholds of significance. As indicated in the response to Question 21.A., to address Collier County's concurrency regulations, a "2 %/2 %/3 %" threshold of significance was used, where the 2 percent threshold was applied on the first and second roadway segments as one departs from the site, and three percent thereafter. These thresholds of significance are more stringent than those required by DRI statues, an issue which may affect subsequent Development Order discussions. Table 21 -5 provides a summary of estimated 2019 conditions at the significantly impacted locations. At only two road segments are conditions expected to below level of service standard. On these two segments, and at site access points, more detailed intersection capacity analyses were undertaken to identify improvements that would restore the adopted level of service standards. These intersections are: • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at I -75 Ramps (North) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at I -75 Ramps (South) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at Davis Boulevard • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) at Rattlesnake Hammock Road (A.M. and P.M. peak hour analysis) • S.R. 951 at Manatee Road • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at Northern Site Access (A.M. and P.M. peak hour analysis) • Collier Boulevard (C.R. 95 1) at The Lord's Way (A.M. and P.M. peak hour analysis) Intersection turning movement volume forecasts are included in Appendix 21 -H. QA2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Bwrings \Q21 \Q21 Trawportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg.17 [A D� Levels of service were calculated using the following methodologies: • Signalized Arterials Synchro (2000 HCM Procedures) • Signalized Intersections Synchro (2000 HCM Procedures) • Unsignalized Intersections Highway Capacity Software (2000 HCM Procedures) Capacity analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 21 -I. Table 21 -7 summarizes the results of the capacity analysis. As shown in Table 21 -7 A and B, the Collier Blvd /I75 South Ramps is the only intersection where improvements will be required to achieve adopted performance standards. At this Table 21 -7a Arterial Level of Service Analysis Summary Roadway Average Speed [mph] Level of Service Direction On From To Collier Blvd Davis Blvd 1 -75 Ramps 6.8 F S.R. 951 Tower Rd Manatee Rd 17.5 D Lid intersection the following improvements are required: • Reduce the number of southbound through lanes from four to three, • Lengthen the outside right turn lane at the Collier Boulevard /Davis Boulevard intersection approximately 650 feet (from E +C turn lane end to I -75 eastbound off ramps), • By reducing the number of southbound through lanes and lengthening the southbound right turn lane at the Collier Boulevard /Davis Boulevard intersection, it will be possible to provide two receiving lanes for the eastbound right turn movement at the Collier Boulevard /I -75 South Ramps intersection, enabling this movement to operate as free flow. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakca MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DR] - ADA \Subtaak 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docz 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg.18 C Table 21 -8 summarizes the results of the "with improvements" capacity analysis. Worksheets that identify when each improvement will need to be implemented are included in Appendix 21- J. Table 21 -8a Arterial Level of Service Analysis Summary With Improvements Scenario Roadway Average Speed [mph] Level of Service Direction On From To Collier Blvd Davis Blvd 1 -75 Ramps 19.3 1 D I NB Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtuk 3.2 DRI ADA Support\H=ringS \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean)AMx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg.19 Table 21 -7b Signalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary Intersection Time Period Measure Movement Overall EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Collier Blvd at I -75 North Ramps PM Peak Hour V/C n/a n/a n/a 0.88 n/a 0.24 0.99 0.46 n/a n/a 0.77 0.09 0.90 Delay [sec) n/a n/a n/a 72.9 n/a 44.7 16.5 6.9 n/a n/a 46.8 35.6 24.5 LOS n/a n/a n/a E n/a D B A n/a n/a D D C Collier Blvd at I -75 South Ramps PM Peak Hour V/C 0.15 n/a 1.31 n/a n/a n/a n/a 1.16 0.25 1.42 0.45 n/a 1.24 Delay [sec] 26.9 n/a 186.9 n/a n/a n/a n/a 104.1 23.4 310.6 3.7 n/a 96.5 LOS C n/a F n/a n/a n/a n/a F C F A n/a F V/C 0.94 0.99 n/a 0.51 0.73 0.98 0.97 0.90 0.15 0.43 0.97 0.34 0.96 Collier Blvd PM Delay [sec] 56.1 82.9 n/a 62.2 73.0 99.3 71.4 62.9 79.9 61.2 32.9 29.9 54.9 at Davis Blvd Peak Hour LOS E F n/a E E F E E E E C C D V/C n/a n/a n/a 0.79 n/a 0.13 n/a 0.98 0.08 0.98 0.49 n/a 0.94 Collier Blvd PM Delay [sec] n/a n/a n/a 92.1 n/a 58.5 n/a 42.4 12.4 56.5 7.2 n/a 32.9 at Manatee Rd Peak Hour LOS n/a r n/a I n/a I F n/a E n/a D B E A n/a C Table 21 -8b Signalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary With Improvements Scenario Intersection Time Period Measure Movement Overall EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Collier Blvd at I -75 South Ramps PM Peak Hour V/C 0.56 n/a 0.50 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0.79 0.21 0.60 0.37 n/a 0.71 Delay [sect 60.8 n/a 0.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a 19.2 16.1 88.5 0.2 n/a 12.6 LOS E n/a A n/a n/a n/a n/a B B F A n/a B Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA\Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support\Hearings\Q21,Q21 Transportation (clean).d- 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg.20 U 14 G. Identify the anticipated number and general location of access points for driveways, median openings, and roadways necessary to accommodate the proposed development. Describe how the applicant's access plan will minimize the impacts of the proposed development and preserve or enhance traffic flow on the existing and proposed transportation system. This information will assist the applicant and governmental agencies in reaching conceptual agreement regarding the anticipated access points. While the ADA may constitute a conceptual review for access points, it is not a permit application and, therefore, the applicant is not required to include specific design requirements (geometry) until the time of permit application. Response: The major site access points are illustrated on the master site development plan of the ADA. The site will utilize an internal collector road system to collect and distribute traffic from individual residential enclaves and building sites to the adjacent roadway network. The project is proposing three connections to Collier Blvd. (C.R. 951), one at the North Project Driveway (full connection), the second one at The Lord's Way (right - in/right- out/left -in connection), and the third one at Rattlesnake Hammock Road (full connection). Traffic signals are anticipated to be required at the first and third of these site access intersections. Table 21 -9 summarizes the results of the capacity analysis and Table 21 -10 summarizes the recommended geometry. Worksheets summarizing site access intersection levels of service and recommended geometry are included in Appendix 21 -K. No other major direct connections to Collier Blvd. are anticipated but a secondary entry point to the commercial area south of Rattlesnake Hammock Rd may be pursued at a later date. Such entry is not expected to be used by the DRI residents but would be a convenient entry point to the shopping areas for travelers on Collier Blvd. Q02005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA`,Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q2I Q21 Transportation (clean).docz 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg.21 ® Table 21 -9a Signalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary Project Driveway Intersection Time period Measure Movement Overall EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR V/C n/a n/a n/a 0.76 n/a 0.07 n/a 0.56 0.04 0.44 0.64 n/a 0.66 AM Delay [sec] n/a n/a n/a 62.5 n/a 46.0 n/a 21.2 23.3 65.2 9.0 n/a 17.8 Collier Blvd Peak Hour LOS n/a n/a n/a E n/a D n/a C C E A n/a B at North Project V/C n/a n/a n/a 0.66 n/a 0.03 n/a 0.78 0.13 0.61 0.53 n/a 0.77 Driveway PM Delay [sec] n/a n/a n/a 64.5 n/a 52.6 n/a 3.9 0.1 52.5 3.7 n/a 6.5 Peak Hour LOS n/a n/a n/a E n/a D n/a A A D A n/a A V/C 0.88 0.62 0.07 0.79 0.78 0.10 0.78 0.58 0.07 0.65 0.87 0.46 1 0.80 AM Delay [sec] 67.6 53.6 45.1 70.3 68.5 53.6 72.3 26.2 19.1 53.1 45.4 79.5 49.6 Collier Blvd Peak Hour LOS E D D E E D E C B D D E D at Rattlesnake V/C 0.99 1.00 0.15 0.86 1.00 0.64 0.73 1.00 0.25 0.99 0.65 0.47 0.96 Hammock Rd PM Peak Hour Lelay 821 90.7 3 9.2 79.1 102.7 62.9 61.3 61.0 29.5 72.7 29.4 76.0 62.5 F F D E F E E E C E C E E Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP,0003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DR] ADA Support \Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg.22 E 11 Table 21 -9b Unsignalized Intersections Level of Service Analysis Summary Project Driveway Intersection Time Period Measure Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR V/C n/a n/a 0.09 n/a n/a 0.04 0.06 (1) (1) 0.01 (1) (1) AM Peak Hour Delay [sec] n/a n/a 15.8 n/a n/a 12.7 15.2 (1) (1) 11.6 (1) (1) LOS n/a n/a C n/a n/a B C (1) (1) B (1) (1) Collier Blvd at PM V/C n/a n/a 0.13 n/a n/a 0.05 0.08 (1) (1) 0.06 (1) (1) Lord's Way Delay [sec] n/a n/a 14.6 n/a n/a 17.6 14.2 (1) (1) 17.0 (1) (1) Peak Hour LOS n/a n/a B n/a n/a C B (1) (1) C (1) (1) Note 1: Unopposed movement Q:\2005\050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP,0003 DRI- ADA'Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support,Hearings \Q21 \Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg.23 E10 Table 21 -10 Project Driveways Geometry Intersection Geometry 1194 N tNorth Project Collier Blvd r Driveway at North Driveway lit Collier Blvd T «�lil�► N L Collier Blvd Lord's Way at Lord's Way Collier Blvd T «� 111 �►�► L N Rattlesnake Collier Blvd J r Hammock Rd at J r Rattlesnake y Hammock Rd Z Olt Collier Blvd Keterences: NOW Existing Lane ON* New Lane Q:A2005V050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPLD- DRI- ERPV0003 DR] - ADAASubtask 3.2 DR] ADA SupporrHearings \Q21AQ21 Transportation (clean).doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg.24 H. If applicable, describe how the project will complement the protection of existing, or development of proposed, transportation corridors designated by local governments in their comprehensive plans. In addition, identify what commitments will be made to protect the designated corridors such as interlocal agreements, right -of -way dedication, building set- backs, etc. Response: The only longer -term future roadway corridor being considered in the area that the applicant is aware of is Benfield Rd. Possible alignments of this potential corridor have been studied by Collier County. This road is a planned north -south corridor to be located approximately one mile east of Collier Blvd., and is planned to extend at least from U.S. 41 to north of I -75. I. What provisions, including but not limited to sidewalks, bicycle paths, internal shuttles, ridesharing, and public transit, will be made for the movement of people by means of other than private automobile? Refer to internal design, site planning, park provisions, locations, etc. Response: The Hacienda Lakes DRI is proposed to include pedestrian and bicycle paths throughout the site. Please refer to Map N, Pedestrian Facilities Master Plan, and Map O, Transit Master Plan that depicts the interrelatedness of the proposed pedestrian circulation within the Project and the potential Collier Area Transit (CAT) routes and stops. While further coordination Q will be required in the future with CAT through the local development order approval process, the fundamental intent for pedestrian and transit circulation is provided for in these application materials. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q2I Q21 Transportation (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q21 Pg.25 �01 X QUESTION 22 AIR See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (6); POLICY (19) GOAL (11); POLICIES (1), (2), (3), (4) GOAL (22); POLICY (3) Except for projects that are proposed industrial developments, a commitment that any proposed DRI will comply with all FDEP permit requirements will suffice as a sufficient response for this question. Response: Hacienda Lakes DRI will comply with all FDEP permit requirements. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q22 \Question 22 Air.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q22 Pg. 1 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 23 HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS MATA"c-n- ,,�,�n CON S UC.T INC Engineering Z % . .L JL Surveying (QUESTION 23 — HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (7); POLICY (24) GOAL (9); POLICIES (3),(4) A. 1. Identify any residential development proposed within the hurricane vulnerability zone delineated in the applicable regional hurricane evacuation study, regional public hurricane shelter study or adopted county peacetime emergency plan. If so, delineate the proposed development's location on the appropriate county and /or regional hurricane evacuation map and respond to questions B.(1) and B.(2) below. Proposed mobile home and park trailer developments should answer question B.(1), regardless of location, or answer questions B.(1) and B.(2) below, if proposed within the hurricane vulnerability zone or the high hazard hurricane evacuation area. Response: The Hacienda Lakes DRI proposes residential development located within the hurricane vulnerability zone as defined by Rule 9J- 2.0256 F.A.C. Please see Map C. 2. Identify any hotel /motel or recreational vehicle /travel trailer development proposed within the high hazard hurricane evacuation area delineated in the applicable ® regional hurricane evacuation study, regional public hurricane shelter study, or adopted county peacetime emergency plan. If present, delineate the proposed development's location on the appropriate county or regional hurricane evacuation map and answer questions B.(1) and B.(2) below. Response: A 135 room hotel is proposed within the commercial center of the development, as shown on Map H. This area is within the Category 3 Storm Surge area as depicted on the SLOSH Model for Collier County and is not classified as a high hazard hurricane evacuation area. 3. Identify whether the proposed development is location in a designated special hurricane preparedness district. Response: The Hacienda Lakes DRI is located in a Special Hurricane Preparedness District as defined in 9J- 2.0256 and 9J- 2.0257 F.A.C. B. 1. For each phase of the development, determine the development's public hurricane shelter space requirements based on the behavioral assumptions identified in the applicable regional study or county plan. Identify the existing public hurricane shelter space capacity during the one hundred year or category three hurricane event within the county where the development is being proposed and indicate whether the county has deficit or surplus of public hurricane shelter space during the one hundred year or category three hurricane event. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Supportliearings \Q23 \Question 23 Hurricane Preparedness.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q23 Pg. 1 QResponse: The SWFRPC Hurricane Evacuation Study assumes a 12% shelter use rate which translates into a shelter space need for 422 people from the Hacienda Lakes DRI. The table below identifies the amount of shelter space (in people) required per phase of the development. Year Units Persons (2/household) Shelter Space (12 %) 2012 50 100 12 2013 250 500 60 2014 250 500 60 2015 250 500 60 2016 250 500 60 2017 250 500 60 2018 250 500 60 2019 210 420 50 TOTAL 1,760 3,520 422 The most recent available data, as provided by the SWFRPC, identifies the existing shelter space capacity for Collier County and the shelter space demand for a land falling storm event, parallel storm event, and exiting storm event, and is attached. The anticipated shelter space demand for a Category 3 event is 12% of the total peak ® population located within the Category 3 Storm Surge Area, as shown in Table 15, or 37,612 persons (.12 x 313,438). As shown in Table 17 and 17 -A, there is an existing shelter space capacity for 31,495 people in Collier County. Please refer to the attached Tables for the analysis of the public hurricane shelter space capacity. The developer has coordinated with Collier County Department of Emergency Management to determine how the DRI can mitigate for any impacts to the existing County shelters. Mitigation will address impacts related to increased shelter demand and increase of special needs population. A copy of the proposed mitigation credits and correspondence from CEM are attached. 2. For each phase of the development, determine the number of evacuation vehicles the development would generate during a hurricane evacuation event based on the transportation and behavioral assumptions identified in the applicable regional study or county plan. Identify the nearest designated hurricane evacuation route and determine what percentage of level of service hourly directional and maximum service volume the project will utilize. Response: Although Collier County does not typically order a mandatory evacuation of this area for a Category 3 storm event, the SWFRPC Hurricane Evacuation Study bases their calculations on the assumption that 100% of the residents will evacuate. The Hacienda Lakes DRI includes 1,760 dwelling units. Assuming 2 persons per vehicle, the DRI will generate 1,760 evacuation vehicles. The table below identifies number of evacuation vehicles generated per phase of the development. Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q23 \Question 23 Hurricane Preparedness.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q23 Pg. 2 Year Units Persons (2 /household) Evacuation Vehicles 2012 50 100 50 2013 250 500 250 2014 250 500 250 2015 250 500 250 2016 250 500 250 2017 250 500 250 2018 250 500 250 2019 210 420 210 TOTAL 1,760 3,520 1,760 Evacuation routes have been identified on Map C. The attached Tables for a land falling storm event, parallel storm event, and exiting storm event identify the total number of the number of evacuation vehicles in the County (Table 16) and the evacuation route capacities (Table 21). SWFRPC ADA Supplemental Questions The following questions must be provided to answer Questions 23.b.1 & 2 of the state questionnaire: 1. Elevation of the first floor living units; Response: The elevation of the first floor living units will be between 13.5' to 15.5' NGVD. 2. Number of first floor living units; Response: There are an estimated 1,340 first floor living units. Number of anticipated residents that will need to be evacuated in a worst case category three storm. Response: It is assumed that the Hacienda Lakes DRI will include residents that will need to be evacuated in a worst case category three storm, which are referred to as the special needs population. Mr. James von Rinteln, former Coordinator at Collier County Emergency Management advised that the typical assumption of 1 out of 50 people is considered special needs. Therefore, it is assumed that 70 residents will need to be evacuated in a worst case category three event. ® 4. Routes proposed to be utilized for evacuation purposes; and Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q23 \Question 23 Hurricane Preparedness.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q23 Pg. 3 QResponse: The residents of the Hacienda Lakes DRI will utilize Collier Boulevard (County Road 951) to travel northbound toward I -75 or southbound toward Tamiami Trail (US 41) depending on the storm event (land falling, parallel or exiting) and how soon before the storm event they are evacuating. The evacuation routes have been identified on Map C. 5. Impact that additional (project) traffic will have on evacuation time. Response: The Tables provided to us by the SWFRPC for a land falling storm event, parallel storm event, and exiting storm event have been updated to include the residents of the Hacienda Lakes DRI. Please refer to the attached Tables that reflect the impact the Hacienda Lakes DRI will have on evacuation routes during a hurricane evacuation event. The additional evacuation traffic from the Hacienda Lakes DRI will will utilize less than twenty -five (25) percent of the hurricane evacuation route's level of service E hourly directional maximum service volume based on the Florida Department of Transportation's Generalized Peak Hour/Peak Direction. If on -site shelters are proposed to be utilized, then provide the following information: 1. The buildings that are proposed to be utilized; Response: No on -site shelters are being proposed in the Hacienda Lakes DRI given that Q Mr. James von Rinteln, former Coordinator at Collier County Emergency Management, communicated that the County has found off -site shelters to be more manageable. The applicant has worked with the CCEM to determine how the DRI can mitigate for any impacts to the existing County shelters. Mitigation will address impacts related to increased shelter demand and increase of special needs population. A copy of the proposed mitigation credits and correspondence from CEM are attached. 2. The building area in square feet; Response: N/A 3. Proposed elevations of the on -site shelters; and Response: N/A 4. What emergency facilities (water supply, power generation, waste storage, etc.) will be available. - Response: N/A In addition, indicate what efforts will be made to advise and educate residents concerning hurricane preparedness, evacuation and routes and shelter space both on and off site. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SupportUiearings \Q23 \Question 23 Hurricane Preparedness.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q23 Pg. 4 0 Response: Please see attached Emergency Preparedness Plan. NO :•7 IL HAZARD ANALYSIS This section of the plan should describe the hazards that the residential community is vulnerable to, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, flooding, fires, and hazardous material incidents from fixed facilities or transportation accidents. RPC Comment: Hazards Analysis Table is not correct. There will be flooding on the site as predicted in the SLOSH. Please contact the SWFRPC to get these flood levels and then update the table. Response: The Hacienda Lakes community, like all of Southwest Florida, is vulnerable to the effects of a hurricane or tropical storm. Storm surge, wind damage, torrential rains, and flying debris are some of the hazards associated with a hurricane. This area is also vulnerable to tornadoes, flooding, brush fires, and hazardous materials incidents. Based on information provided by Collier County Emergency management, the following table describes the flood levels that can be expected in the area: Category of Sustained Water Level/Surge Height Water Level/Surge Height Hurricane Winds (Feet Above Sea Level) (Feet Above Sea Level) (MPH) (For An Approaching Storm) (For An Exiting Storm) Tropical Storm 39 -74 4.1' -6.2' 4.1' -6.2' No Inundation No Inundation 1 74 -95 4.6' -7.8' 4.6' -7.8' No Inundation No Inundation 2 96 -110 7.4' -11.9' 7.4' -11.9' Probable Inundation Probable Inundation 3 111 -130 10.1' -16.5' 10.1' -16.5' Inundation Inundation 4/5 131 -155+ 14.2' -22.3' 14.2' -22.3' Inundation Inundation The developer has provided an Emergency Preparedness Plan, and will work with the Florida Division of Forestry, Collier County Emergency Management staff, and the managers of any adjacent or nearby public lands, to develop a Wildfire Prevention and Mitigation Plan that will reduce the likelihood of threat to life and property from wildfires. This plan shall address, at a minimum: project structural design; the use of materials and location of structures so as to reduce wildfire threat; firebreaks and buffers; water features; and, the rationale for prescribed burning on adjacent or nearby lands Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q23 \Question 23 Hurricane Preparedness.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q23 Pg. 5 Co Ier C Unty Bureau of Emergency Services MEMORANDUM TO: Kay Deselem Zoning and land Development Review Mr. Dwight Nadeau, RWA Consulting Engineers FROM: Dan E. summers, DirectK2;1�'— DATE: July 23, 2010 RE: DRI - 2006 -AR 10147 Hacienda Lakes, # 2006030093 in accordance with the discussions and information provided in the Toll Rattlesnake PUD, now referenced as Hacienda lakes noted above we are providing the followft information to be induded in the Development Order in support of Hurricane Preparedness discussions rued on pages 121 -126, Ith revision 4. L 1. We concur with the analysis regarding the evacuee shelter impacts. 2. We concur with the shelter impacts for persons who will have special needs referenced as (PSN). Collier County will experience a hardship in managing hurricane evacuation shelter census from projected impacts from this development Presently, shelter space is available however supplies W support the estimated 422 evacuees and 70 special needs clients are not. Collier County Emergency Management request the following supplies and equipment to be purchased by the developer in accordance with our strict specdirrii tions and in some cases sole source provider and delivered in new condition, free on board (FOB) to the Collier County Emergency Services Center, prior to issuance the first residential certificate of occupancy. Collier County will address issues of manufacture changes or minor vendor deviations with the developer prior to their acquisition to ensure compatibility with current shelter support delivery systems. This contribution shall be a one -time contribution. That will constitute the entire commitment necessary for the DRI as currently proposed. Should amendments be sought to this project, this issue shall be re-evaluated and additional mitigation may be required RES 8075 Lely Cultural Parkway • Naples; Florida 34113.239- 252 -3600 - FAX 239 - 252 -3700 • www,collierem.org Memorandum Page 2. 1. 422 - Four hundred and twenty two new military type adult folding disaster cots from an approved list of elig bie vendors and type and style. Said cots shall be compatible with Collier County's existing storage and delivery systems. 2. 72 Seventy two new special need's disaster oats from an approved list of eligible vendors and type and style. Said cots shad! be compatible with Collier County's existing storage and delivery systems. 3. (2) -Two, new 45kw towable portable generators with heavy duty diesel engine, sound insulated, manufactured by Godwin Pump and Genemor to exactly match the supplies, equipment, and power distribution systems approved and currently in use or near the time of equipment acquisition by the developer as approved by the Department of Emergency Management. This is a sole source procurement to ensure compatibility and parallel operations of generators within our existing fleet and insure the ability to provide essential emergency portable power to additional evacuation shelter spaces consumed by the increased shelter census noted above. Coiner County will assume A maintenance, repair, and rephxmmenrt of these generators following satisfactory acceptance beyond the warranty period. 4. (2) Two, new enclosed utility trailers for the storage and transport of the supplies noted above. Collier County Emergency Management will own and maintain these trailers and augment them with oilier minor disaster supplies in a fashion similar to its current disaster response unit (DRU) shelter supply delivery system. These trailers shall be new, from an approved list of vendor(s) at least 16 feet in length, dual axle bad rated at 7,000Ibs with trailer brakes, with laminate finish interior wall and floor finish, cabinets, shelving and load secure devices, DOT approved for highway use, dropdown rear door and curbside door and extended tongue hitch length. At least one of the two trailers noted above must irx xhng mtenor AC wiring, lighting, a generator connection, circuit breaker and roof mounted air conditioning to allow the empty trailer to be used for special post disaster field offices, damage assessment and relief efforts identical to our existing fleet of disaster supply trailers. Following the satisfactory receipt of these supplies Collier County Emergency Management will notify the Growth Management Division that these iuirdcane impacts have been sufficiently addressed. Items received will be cataloged and reported to the Board of County Commissioners for their accounting and asset tracking purposes. In closing, I appreciate your assistance with this important hurricane impact reduction. If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to call. Thank you. Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services Department of Emergency Management Hacienda Lakes Development of Regional Impacts - Hurricane Mitigation Credits October 11, 2010 Supersedes E -mails of 9/21/10 Mitigation Credit efforts by the developer: a. Delivery of one of the portable generators noted in your letter shall be completed prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. b. Delivery of the two utility trailers requested prior to issuance but in no case to be delivered to Collier County any later than 12 months from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy or upon the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 150 -th home. c. Delivery of the other portable generator prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy of the 300th home, but in no case to be delivered to Collier County any later than 24 months from the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. d. Delivery of the 72 special needs disaster cots by the issuance of certificate of occupancy of the 900th home, but in no case to be delivered to Collier County any later than 36 months from the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. e. Delivery of the 422 military type cots by certificate of occupancy of last home (1200th), but in no case to be delivered to Collier County any later than 48 months from the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. Developer POC: David Torres cel. 904 - 762 -4454 PART V. HUMAN RESOURCE IMPACTS QUESTION 24 — HOUSING See State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (GOAL 16); POLICY (3) The development program has changed materially since the prior submission. The accompanying data reflects the impacts of substantial modifications in the residential and non - residential components of the development program. A. 1. If the proposed development contains residential development, provide the following information on Table 1 for each phase of the development. Response: The residential component of the Hacienda Lakes project incorporates a mix of housing types. Residential development will be oriented to the for sale market. For sale housing may be in the form of single family, villas, condominiums, or townhomes. The table below illustrates the new residential units proposed in the Hacienda Lakes DRI. Table 24 -1: New Dwelling Units within Proposed Development QTable Single Family (Sale) 704 Multifamily (Sale) 1,056 Total 1,760 N 2. What number and percent of lots will be sold without constructed dwelling units? What is the extent of improvements to be made on these prior to sale? Response: The sale of unimproved lots other than to builders is not anticipated. 3. What will be the target market for the residential development (break down by number, percent and type, the number of dwelling units to be marketed for retirees, family, etc.) What portion will be marketed as a second or vacation homes? Response: The target market for residential development is both families and individuals, regardless of age. Marketing efforts are anticipated to target those households with income /net worth necessary for purchase. While market conditions will dictate the ultimate breakdown, the target market for residential development will likely be a combination of seasonal and second home owners, empty nesters, retirees and families Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 1 QB. 1. Indicate and discuss the availability or projected availability of adequate housing and employment opportunities reasonably accessible to the development site. Housing opportunities should be described in terms of type, tenure, and cost range and location within the following circumscribed areas: adjacent, two miles, five miles, ten miles, and within the local jurisdiction or county. Employment opportunities should be described in terms of two digit NAICS code numbers located within the local jurisdiction with estimated distances or transit times to the development site. Response: This analysis uses the housing supply and demand methodology originally created by the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council (ECFRPC) and accepted as a template by the Department of Community Affairs in the past. In this template, employment opportunities are those created by the project itself because other impacts are conjectural and, to the degree they do occur, may stem from development or activity outside the influence or control of this project. The housing supply considered in the analysis does not include any of the units that might be developed in the project. It is possible that some units may ultimately fall into price ranges that will be affordable for the moderate and 120% of moderate income groups as the result of decisions made by subsequent builder /developers or individual owners that might rent or sell their properties. Methodolo ,-) The estimated number of permanent employees within the Hacienda Lakes project is shown in the following table. The income estimates listed below are based on ES -202 figures and represent the average for the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Codes for each category. All of employees presented in the following table are not necessarily included within the demand analysis due to some occupations earning salaries above 120% of the moderate income range. Of the 906 total employees shown in the following table, approximately 891 employees are included in this analysis as a result of their salaries being less than or equal to 120% of the moderate income. Table 24 -7 presents the NAICS codes considered in this analysis for each use. Table 24 -2: Hacienda Lakes Employment Applicable to Demand Analysis Source: AWI (ES -202) 2006; RERC Although, rationally, the analysis should only assess the demand - supply relationship of ® affordable housing for the first phase in the program, the current analysis shows the demand generated for all years in which new employment is generated as a result of new construction. It is likely that as development occurs in future years, the demand associated with the proposed Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 2 verage Salary 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total Office $64,692 0 57 71 71 0 0 0 0 199 Business Park $64,692 0 0 114 57 57 57 57 57 399 Retail $26,357 46 250 250 0 0 0 0 0 546 Elementary School $40,934 0 0 0 69 0 0 0 0 69 Hotel $31,779 0 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 68 Total Employment 46 307 503 197 57 57 57 57 1,053 Source: AWI (ES -202) 2006; RERC Although, rationally, the analysis should only assess the demand - supply relationship of ® affordable housing for the first phase in the program, the current analysis shows the demand generated for all years in which new employment is generated as a result of new construction. It is likely that as development occurs in future years, the demand associated with the proposed Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 2 N future development will be re- analyzed to reflect the new demand for housing at that time. This is the most conservative means of approaching the affordable needs issue. Several of the factors used to calculate demand such as the relevant income within Collier County, employment generation ratios, and headship rates could easily change by the time the subsequent analyses are done, potentially causing a material reduction in future demand. Demand Assumptions: In calculating the housing demand, single and multiple worker households are considered separately because multiple worker households earn considerably higher wages. Households with two workers earn an estimated 75% more than single worker households in Collier County. Households with three or more workers earn an estimated 121% more than single worker households in Collier County. The details of income breakdowns for all three household types for total employment are included in Tables 24 -1. The detailed breakdowns of income group and household type for each job category are presented in Tables 24 -2 through 24 -4. • Permanent employment was estimated using typical square feet per employee or employees per hotel room ratios for each appropriate land use as referenced in the following table. Table 24 -3: Employment Ratios by Land Use General Office 350 SF per employee Business Park 350 SF per employee School 0.075 Employees per student Retail 600 SF per employee Hotel 0.5 Employees room • The median household income for Collier County in 2009 - $70,800 -was utilized to provide relative comparisons for household incomes for the estimated number of employees. • Income classification thresholds (Very Low, Low etc.) are based upon multiples of the median household income for Collier County, which is $70,800. Households in the very low - income category have incomes of less than 50% of the county median. Households in the low - income category have incomes of between 50% and 80% of the county median. Households in the moderate - income category have incomes of between 80% and 120% of the county median. Households with incomes above this range are not considered relevant in terms of the impacts that this question seeks to address. • Household headship rates were applied to the estimated number of permanent employees at the project in the relevant income ranges to arrive at the total number of households where a project employee is the head of the household. The household Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 3 Qheadship rates used in this analysis are as follows: Very Low — 40.6 %, Low — 57.4% and Moderate — 67.8%. 1401 • Total household income is assumed to be higher for multiple worker households than single worker households based on whether there are two or three or more workers in the household. Affordable housing prices were established using, as a starting point, the wage ranges previously discussed as well as certain reasonable assumptions concerning maximum affordable housing costs and mortgage terms. Of particular importance are the demands generated for housing at the very low and low income ranges. The specific assumptions used to establish housing affordability and demand are summarized below: • Housing affordability was calculated assuming an industry standard 30% of household income can be allocated to total housing payments. The midpoint of each defined income range was used to calculate a maximum monthly payment based upon this 30% housing expense. • Total affordable monthly housing payments were discounted by 10% in order to reflect taxes, insurance and utilities under an owner - occupied scenario or by $50 to reflect utilities under a renter- occupied scenario. The discounted amounts represent the total monthly sum available for principal and interest under an owner - occupied scenario or the total sum available for rent under a renter- occupied scenario. • For owner - occupied housing, the estimate of the total household income available for principal and interest was translated into a supportable home price using a 7% interest rate, 30 year mortgage, and a 5% down payment. The resulting home prices represent the amounts that reasonably can be afforded by households within a given income range under these specific financing assumptions Today, 7% might be considered high such that the analysis tends to overstate housing costs. The following table summarizes the results of this demand analysis and the details are presented in Table 24 -5. Table 24 -4: Hacienda Lakes Housing Demand Summary Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 4 A or a e ce . n. II per Income Group Home Monthly Housing Income Group Income Range Price Rent Demand Very Low Less than $35,400 $108,023 $796 329 Low $35,400 - $56,639 $178,002 $1,343 119 Moderate $56,640 - $84,960 $264,404 $2,020 150 Above Moderate $84,961 - $93,810 $296,807 $2,273 0 Total 599 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 4 The demand analysis indicates that of the total 906 permanent employees that the Hacienda Lakes project might generate, there could be demand for approximately 397 housing units in the low, very low, and moderate income ranges. Supply Assumptions: The available supply necessary to meet these demands must be located within a 10 -mile radius and a 20- minute commute from the project site. To estimate the availability of affordable for sale, or owner - occupied, units within the housing study area, the analysis focuses on data associated with recent housing transactions recorded with the property appraiser offices in Collier County. The analysis includes sales of single family residences, townhouses, and condominiums recorded in the public records between January 2009 and December 2009. These transactions fall within the appropriate affordability thresholds identified in the project housing demand analysis and include only those transactions recognized by the property appraiser as being qualified, arm's - length sales. Other properties excluded from the analysis are mobile homes, and properties with a transaction price of less than $50,000, properties with a transaction price greater than $299,000. To account for transactions not accurately representing arm's length transaction opportunities, RERC removed properties from the dataset with a just value greater than 125% of the 2009 sale price QIn order to avoid any potential distortions caused by multiple sales of the same housing unit, our analysis includes only the most recent sale of any given residence and excludes any prior sales of the same residence. The resulting sample provides a good picture of the affordable for sale housing market in the study area for a typical year. To estimate the supply of available rental housing units, we identified the inventory of multi- family units reported in the Collier County tax rolls and matched data from that list with proprietary information available to RERC. In aggregate, we were able to determine with some confidence that at least 7,500 units might be available in such projects for rental purposes today. Given that we have not included any single family properties that ordinarily comprise a material part of any community's rental inventory, we would deem this count conservative. These numbers are further adjusted based on their availability to accommodate the targeted population. Our analysis suggests at the current time, approximately 1,100 units in this inventory are potentially available in the current marketplace. Again, we deem this count conservative, largely because single family units and condominiums that might be available for lease have been excluded. The American Community Survey offers sample data on unit attributes and rents . We have adopted that information into our analysis as a means of illustrating the range and distribution of rents in the Collier County marketplace. The following table summarizes the results of this supply analysis. These results are presented in greater detail in Table 24 -6 which compares demand and supply. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI.ERPM03 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 5 U Table 24 -5: Hacienda Lakes Housing Supply Summary Income Group Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total Income Range Less than $35,400 $35,400 - $56,639 $56,640 - $84,960 $84,961 - $93,810 m Total Housing Affordable Price Supply per Income per Income Group $2,020 Group Home Monthly For For Price Rent Sale Rent Total $108,021 $795 117 253 370 $177,984 $1,343 265 702 967 $264,404 $2,020 320 122 442 $296,807 $2,273 52 36 88 754 1,113 1,867 As previously explained, this analysis concentrates on the relationship between supply and demand for the entire project. The following table summarizes the relationship between total demand for housing and the supply that is representative of a typical year. Details from within each income group are shown in Table 24 -6 but it can be seen by this summary that there is adequate affordable housing proximate the Hacienda Lakes site to provide all employees with housing options. Table 24 -6: Summary Comparison of Supply and Demand by Income Group, Hacienda Lakes Income Group Very Low Low Moderate Above Moderate Total Income Range Less than $35,400 $35,400 - $56,639 $56,640 - $84,960 $84,961 - $93,810 Maximum Affordable Price Home Monthly Price Rent $108,021 $795 $177,984 $1,343 $264,404 $2,020 $296,807 $2,273 Surplus Total Supply Total Demand or (Deficit) 370 329 41 967 119 848 442 150 292 88 0 88 1,867 599 1,268 To summarize, this analysis indicates there should be no unsatisfied affordable housing demand generated by the project B. 2. Please describe the locations of employment centers where residents of the project are likely to work, given their expected income profiles, ages, family makeup and other pertinent factors. Travel routes, travel times, and commuting costs should be discussed, as well as the possibility of transportation by means other than the private automobile. Employment opportunities should be described in terms of two - digit SIC codes for jobs located within the project, within the local jurisdiction, within adjacent jurisdictions and the County, and within neighboring counties, as appropriate. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 6 Response: Comprising 1,760 residential units, there would be approximately 2,816 working persons residing in Hacienda Lakes. Being that Hacienda Lakes is a multi -use DRI, the project is likely to attract workers internally. Other than those residents working within the Hacienda Lakes project, other residents are expected to find employment or are already employed in the local region. Based on ACS data compiling commute times for an estimated 123,000 workers, the majority of residents would be willing to commute to employment centers in Naples. Nearly a third of those surveyed currently travel more than 30 minutes to their place of employment. Based on an analysis of drive -times from the project site, most of the employment centers in the region will require a drive time of less than 30 minutes. The following table summarizes the commuting times of Collier County residents as compiled in the ACS survey. Table 24 -7: Travel Time to Work, Collier County Residents Source: American Community Survey, 2008 Excluding construction jobs, over 900 jobs are expected to be created by the construction of the commercial space associated with the Hacienda Lakes project. This creates another employment center for the area in addition to employment centers in and around the City of Naples. Transportation to these job centers will be limited to automobiles. However, those living and working within the Hacienda Lakes project will have the ability walk or bike to their place of employment. According to data collected by ACS, nearly 90% of Collier County residents either drive alone or carpool to their place of work. Approximately 7% or the residents work at home and only 3% of the residents choose to take public transportation, bike or walk to work. C. If displacement or relocation of existing residents will occur due to the proposed development, identify the number of people that will be affected, any special needs of these people, and any provisions for addressing the effects of the relocation or displacement of these people, particularly in regards to their ability to find suitable replacement housing. Response: Not applicable Q:\2005\050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 7 Less than 5 minutes 3,005 2% 5 to 9 minutes 11,178 9% 10 to 14 minutes 19,377 16% 15 to 19 minutes 21,125 17% 20 to 24 minutes 23,452 19% 25 to 29 minutes 8,767 7% 30 to 34 minutes 18,917 15% 35 to 39 minutes 2,377 2% 40 to 44 minutes 3,049 2% 45 to 59 minutes 7,394 6% 60 to 89 minutes 3,362 3% 90 or more minutes 1,070 1 % Total 123,073 100% Source: American Community Survey, 2008 Excluding construction jobs, over 900 jobs are expected to be created by the construction of the commercial space associated with the Hacienda Lakes project. This creates another employment center for the area in addition to employment centers in and around the City of Naples. Transportation to these job centers will be limited to automobiles. However, those living and working within the Hacienda Lakes project will have the ability walk or bike to their place of employment. According to data collected by ACS, nearly 90% of Collier County residents either drive alone or carpool to their place of work. Approximately 7% or the residents work at home and only 3% of the residents choose to take public transportation, bike or walk to work. C. If displacement or relocation of existing residents will occur due to the proposed development, identify the number of people that will be affected, any special needs of these people, and any provisions for addressing the effects of the relocation or displacement of these people, particularly in regards to their ability to find suitable replacement housing. Response: Not applicable Q:\2005\050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 7 lip] C� Intentionally Blank Page Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings\Q24 \Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 8 N W J m Q Z Lu G O IL W � O_ Y U Q UJ 0 in Z 'Z W O Z J Q i O H 0 O o 00 6q 0 O N ELO O O (fl V � L �+ N O Cd � G co O 0 N L LO 0 O V (d 7 69 C� N 0 O O n M to N r O) O � V (0 69 a) Q 3 N O J N O U HU o° Z z M O U w J c O J @ ~ O U U) N N J W 3 °' rn J O s 5 c i J on a, N d ES powl O N M O V N O 00 (O V N O M O M M O N CD V N O O N O O N O N O M h f-- N (D O M M m N a1 N CO O V 00 I� fD 00 O M E N M Lq O M W O N (M M O C M N n V O 00 N C m cc O t` O O M r � V V 0 co CO 00 00 m O N M M'T (O O CO W m m m O O 69 44 64 69 613-61) 6IS C9 69 N N 59 z; E9 0,60 f9 E9 EA (fl EIS EA EIS EIS f9 V9 09 es O + Y N r = M O 2 3 4) M � O O N N O Cn M N V m O N V M N M t m LOO (D C (O M O) N 0 In m M N CO O O� O f0 O M r � t0 M T M M M N � (O N O Cn h V r V (O 7 Cn (0 N 00 (0 r� 7 N C' V (0 _ O N (O N Ih M m V 0 O r M r M m N CO N M� 0 6M O m N co M M V V In In O r r W co O O O O_ N_ N M M V CO In In f0 O N C CA 69 EA 69 6IS 6IS 69 W 69 W E9 E9 V9 E9 E9 w E9 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 m N O O 0 (0 N O h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0) N M co N h y Y = N 69 0 O = CO O O 7 O O V Olzr M N M O M M N O O V M (O Cn (O In In c (C) 00 O N V N 7 to-) N M O m �; 'V'T) M W 00 V W N N p = EcDrn�v(NO aooCOO �nr�inr�rn000M nrnnco(or��rn V co = O N N M M M V V V V (0 CO (0 O CO O r r� CO M M M O O =3 C Efl 69 6IS 64 6IS 6IS 69 69 69 69 69 69 w w 69 69 69 69 C9 69 69 69 6IS 6IS EIS 69 C- cm N M MV N O O N O O V O O u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 N N � � M m 00 O 0 M N O M O V CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O. 0 o N O M � M M CO Cl) � N L � m to � N 3 = O S N ro m M V m M O O W O O W O m r N O o o o o o 0 o o o 0 O d M O 00 M V 69 0 V 64 O m 6IS O M N 69 6.3, 69 69 69 69 69 69 V9 V3 00 61 N Lo n co O N (D N R co M O B m V 00 (O r': (D 7 r m W N O 6 V 3 co V m It V M N r R m O m N OLr) m N 0 In 7 m N M (O N r N 00 _ 69 69 69 64 O69 69 69 E9 69 C9 64 - W 69 6fl r m N O) N N O O M O (A N O N Ih 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O V- fq N O O O n - n N V V O N - N N r N N s M O E E O E Z W +' i co co O V 00 O-:I- O 1 00 N O m M M N O O 7 O 0 to (O to (O N W C, (0 aD O N N V O N V f` N (0 O M V (O O M V M (0 N CO m V: m ro O M t0 n m f0 f` C 00 O M N m m � 00 (O M m t, W O V r O M r O M (O m M 0 W N (D m N M O N LO r- m N co N N N M M M [ t It V r t (O 0 (O CO (O (O � r - r - 00 m W m m m 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 EA 64 69 69 69 69 6IS 69 69 69 69 69 69 62, 64 0 L. _ CO r M m 0 M t0 m M N 0 0 0 V N N O 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 V CD m � M 0 W � M In W M CO N ao O N�� O O M O h V � O RX M C0 f� O c! - (O m M (0 - O N V r m c O m` (0 N O 00 E (p = m N m N (!7 W (!7 W (f) CO V� O V f.- O V CO M O N M N y N N N M M (M v C 0 LO (O O (D (D r- �� 00 00 00 N m m m f0 69 69 EIS 69 69 va 69 CIS 69 69 CIS 69 69 E9 69 69 69 69 69 6IS E9 69 69 6IS 69 64 C N � O N d CO V 00 N (D O m M r- (O 0) r.- (O m Cl) N d O'I 3 R 6) V co m V O W M CO CO O In l0 W O N In n O O Cl) O h V 00 M Cn � O V CO m M Cn oc M V r m M (O Cn 3 O N N N O N .J N m N 0 m N 0 CO 0 m �J- O I�t N O 7 N O V (D CD O N "O O N N N M M M a V V 0 (O Cn O O O N N N N M 00 00 m m c O 69 (ISfA EIS 6-31 64 69 69 69 69 69 69 E969 Vf 696969 Vfl 64 64 69 69 60 wC9 co O U) ) T O O N CL a� a E m 3 3 i Q) 3 O O U i o cm m m m 3 J 2 Q 2 Q c0 on a, N d ES powl O N M TI II Ni W JI m'. Z R W W OY J J 'a �Q W W W U_ LL Q O2� 0 O 6) 00 EA O N E r N O C� 2 G 00 O O N t w LO L' (fl (6 7 N O cD co co 0% N m O (6 LO M �» > O 3 N O r J LO N O U H CD U Z z D Cl) 0 6s U W °' V J C J co 0 V � J W 3 °' 0 0 D 0 z 'o c i co D 8 0 0 i Y 7 0 0 0 0 0 Cy 0 a N d Q O N M � Co V N O 00 O 7 N 0 M O M M O M (D V N O (0 N O M M CD N O M I- h N (D O M O W N O N CO O V 00 f- (D W O M E N M (O (fl CO c O N M lO (q V M (O , cl V (D 1-, Oc N O O N Mr- O O m V to (O co r- co 00 O O N M_ V� (o (0 h co O O m O O =V 63 EA Ef3 (f3 (fl (f3 to 64 63 — N N 63 (!) EA EA EA 6s 63 EA 6), Efl 6r3 U4 (A 63 e4 Eq e4 00 O O M O O O N O cc 0 0 (0 — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N M _ O = M O O 00 N O Cn M N V O (D (n � OM N_ M V M (O (O E CO to O N (D LO M W N (D O O I� O �O O M I- M V M M M N ll� (D N O) Ln n V - f� V (C V (n (O N 00 (O P- N M V In _ O N N (O N I- M O V O O r M M O (O O N CO V O M O O N = V co M V� (O (O (D 1- � O 00 O) O O O L N N M M V (O to to (O m Ef3 (fl (A 69 6s 6fl 63 to Ef3 (fl EA 64 � Cr Ef3 Ef3 6s Ef3 69 (fl H3 (fl Efl Zr, 3 w V E!3 CO O O O O N O O W O N O O O O M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N (n r N M N 0 = 00 (0 O �' 00 O V O V W N 00 O) M w N (fl O V W O (O (I7 l() (() c E (O co O N N V O N V 1.- N LO (O m V CO 00 W V 00 N M m— V O W O Cl) (O � O) r 0) 00 O M (O fl- 0) f� 00 O M' O p _ = U; O N N c:5 M M M V, V 7 7 (O to M (0 (D (D I.- n W CO O CO CO O O C _ (A V3 W. 6fl EA (f3 EA bq 64 E4 63 EA Efl K3 Ef3 (A 63 693 (fl 64 6) Ei3 EA W 69 CL N L, 0 0 0 0 (D C 0— (D O— 0 0 0 I: N O O O O cc O O O O rn 3 N (7) Y y o C_ > = H !A O O O O O O O O N (D O M 0 0 0 (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 r vV 0 � N t4 N = O Z N O O O O M O O O O O N O O O M 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f- 0) N 69, 63 64 Ef3 to 64 (A 64 EA 64 Efl Efl EA (A Efl Ef3 63 63 6fl 6f3 Lo CY) O 0 t- W 7 � CD O l0 Q) N O1 00 N (O (D N N N O (O (O O) _ (0 N V' 00 +-' O 6s Ef3 64 E4 64 H 0 0 0 CD 0 O O M O O 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W N O N N LO L N O E � E Z W a+ C M CD C) It W O V O V 00 N 00 m M M N (D O V M CD lO (() (O (O N 0') Lo 00 O N N V O N V r- N (O w O V O 00 00 T 00 (n N CD O V O OO O M (O f� O) (O 1� O) O O M (O r O O (D M O M O V I- O M r O M O O M Lo 00 N (D m N� W N U7 I- O N O N N N M M M V V V d' (O CO (O CD (D (D f- i-- r- W W 00 CO O m 63 EA fl3 Efi K3 Ef3 64 613 Ef3 64 VYi EH EA 03 (f3 fA Q4 63 Efl 64 Efl Ef3 63 6s 64 64 M I-- () O O h— (O O M N O CD O V 00 N (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 �, (D O M O M M� M� LO U-) M O N to r• O (0 M O r` V O M (O ` O N V (D O E M (O V CD N V r' D) M CD O h (O N O W E y = N t0 O N (O 00 00 t0 CD V 1- O V 1- O V O CO O N M N y _O N N N M M M a lO (O (O CD (D (D h t-- O 00 m W D) O O f4 Ef3 63 bs 64 EA 64 Ef3 EA 03 U3 EA 613 03 EA EA 44 EA E!3 Ef3 EA to 64 63 Ef3 64 64 -E C O N N M V CO N W O O M f.- to O t- to M M D_ co D) ?� m 6) V O O 7 C) W M O 00 O (O (O 00 O N (O O (fl m cM (O r O N V (O O M (O W (D N V 0` O M (4 OA (O N O E 3 O N Jr-- 0) N (O O) N (O 00 (O O V (O V h O V I'- O V (D N O N "O O N N N M M CY) V q It Ln (O (O CO CO (0 � r- t-- 00 00 CO CO 0 M C O 69 Efl EA EA 63 (f3 (A Efl Efi 63 (fl EH V> V3 Ef3 64 (f3 H3 603 6fl Efl 63 613 64) EA EA N O C o O N a rn E 3 a) Q) 3 0 0 i6 m o 0 c0 C7 o v F F 3 > J �F ¢ 2 Q m D 8 0 0 i Y 7 0 0 0 0 0 Cy 0 a N d Q O N M O' Ir- N W J m c, X Z W W Y 0- —J we W w�/ Q w 2 O O o co O v 00 Efl O � N d EIn Iq 0 co O G co O O N s v to LO 7 69 O M (D N Efl N Q) O >m LO M m Efl Q O N O N N o Lri o O U H o U Z zt z LO Cl) O U W m J c J m O V (n Q) J W 0 O z N i Co J 41 M V N O 00 (D V N O W O Lo M O W (D V N O co N O O 00 (D E N m M Il- r-- N m O M m W N m N (D O R 00 r W M O M N M LI (fl 00 00 O N M Ln ( V M (n - () V m r W N O m 00 00 h (D M C) r- V N m m M O a0 M O m (D M O r- -,T M O M h Lo V`. V V Lo (D co h W 00 m O N M M V m CD CD 1� W m m m 0 0 EA Efl 69 Efl 69 64 Efl Efl r N N 69 69 (fl 69 Eli Efl Efl U1 Efl 69 69 69 Ell Zq Efl Kl 64 L d N (D I-- O O M O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y M L = O = M O m 00 N O Ln M N V m m Lo V M M V m u) (D C C _N co Ln m N co L� m 00 N (O O O I� O Lf) m M I� Ln 00 M M M N Ln (D N m Ln - f� �- 1� (D V m Ln N 00 Ln f� N M V I O = N (D N f- M m V 0 (D Ln (D N 00 V O M (D m N U M M V V In In (D I-- U` m N N M M V Ln to to m m M — 69 Efl 613, El 69 A Kl 69 Kl ER 6�_ 69 dl 69 69 69 69 Efl 69 60 Efl Efl to to m co L m h N O N 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO ll� y N N M Y = N Efl O S N M CO O V W O V O V CO N CO m M CO N (O O V CO (D Lf) Ln U) Un c E Lf) m O N '� cc o) V I-- N Un (D m V (D W 00 'C 00 Ln N m m (c0'4 00 O M Ln I- m Ln f.- m 00 O M Ln n m r- 00 (D (M — m p _ C � v = V W O M � W C N N M M V V V V n UC) LC (D (D (D r 00 00 00 00 m m Efl 69 Ell Efl 6s Ell Efl Ell Efl dl (fl (fl U9. 64 Efl 69 69 69 6%i 69 69 69 (fl EA EA Ell o- a L N M NV N O (D O O m 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn 3 d N `- L _ 6 F- 00 V O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0N(000 co N N S � N � N d 3 = O x N mrl- r V O (D 0 0 It 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (D d) Efl Ell (fl m Efi Efl Efl 6q Efl to Ell EA Eli 69 69 69 64 (A Ell 69 Ell N_ N Ll1- 0 O � N O Ln W N LC) (D 00 V M V +cc-' 0 69 Ell (fl (ii 69 _ Ul (fl w to O co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w y O N 0 r M V V LO LO v L N o E Q 7 E Z W C co (fl O 7 00 O O V 00 N c0 m M 00 N (D O W (D Un Ln Ln LO M .O Lo N O N N V O N V r N LO (D m V (D M 00 V W U) N t2 (D m v_ (D N O M LO � m In h m N O M LO f- m !� 00 (D M m (p -a 00 O V U` O co r O M (D m (M Ln 00 N (fl m N Ln 00 N to f\ m N N (� N N N M M MZt V V V Ln LO to (0 co (D r- r n W W W m m m (fl 69 69 69 69 69 Eli Ell 69 69 EA 69 fA Efi Ki Eli Eli Efi 69 6e 69 Eli Eli Vf , EA Eii .= V (D m M O 00 M Ln 00 LO to to M O N Ln P- O (o OM O n0 OV O D co Un P O N V (D m M LO � (D N RP� m M (D m h Ln N O W y E m N Un m N Un 00 Un W Ln CD v7 r O V r- O V (D 00 c N co N N N N M M M v m Lo Un (D w (D Iz- r� 00 W w w m m m Efl 69 69 69 Eli bl EA to 69 Efl fil EA 60 69 Ell 69 EA EA Ell 69 69 69 Hl Ell El) Ell c � N O N o N Q) MIt M N (0 O m M I- LO m Ln m M f. a t0 3 m 4 (D m 4 O 00 M O w O u) Uo W O N Lo f- O CD M O E� V cq M Un I- O N V (D M Un 00 (D N V F m— M (D m p Ln N O 3 E O 0) "O 3 J r` m N In m N Un 00 Ln 00 V (D V O'1 t-- O"t (fl 00 O N O N N N M M M It V-It Ln Ln Lo (D (D (D r- h 1- 00 00 00 00 m m c O ffl Efl Efl 69 69 69 60,64 6s 69 Efl 69 69 (fl 69 69 69 64 ER EA Eli 69 Eil 69 m O T o O N -a N m 3 E S aEi V O o m m° C C7 > a� > 0 3 o J > Z> Q :5i Q CD O (o m N 0 N U) W W U d O U L 7 O U) on w N d Q 0 Q O N M T T 4 N W J W E9 4- d' I W III W Y i'a �I W Q J Z W W o a ' O O o CO CD 07 O � o3 O o O N E v � m a) 41 C� 0 G � O O N t LO w (fl @ 7 e rn I- 0 r w M N 01 O (6 v � LO M( a) Q O N 3 r O N J r N O U N OD U Z v z o')) O U W r J c O J � _ O U y y a� J W 3 °' (n J 50 Z > J 4% (0 V N O 0 O V N O 0 O (O M O 0 (D V N O co N (D O O0 O N 6) co f.- N (D O M O CO N 0) N (O O V CO r� (O 00 O M E N M 0 (D 00 0 O N M (C) (D V M l0 7 M V (fl r 0 N O O 00 OD f� Q (0 M O I- It N O (0 M O CO CO O O) (D M O 1', 't M O M f' (O <f (O (O (D r-- 00 00 O) M M V (O (O (D 00 Q) a! O O =EV A 603, (A 6969(A 6s V,(i N EO fl Efl ER EA 69 69 6 (A (A 69 69 (fl (A EA (A 69 (fl O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y M L = O = y M O m 0 N O (0 co N V O) O (O C' CO N CO V O) (O � (D (D (O O) N (D 0 M CO N (D O O I� O LO O) M r 0 co V co M M N (O O N O 0 .- r- V - � R (D 't d1 (O N 00 (O h N M V lf) = o N (D N f- M O) V O (D f� M h M 0) (0 CD N OJ V O M (D m N O co O) O) O O �_ N_ N M M V (0 (O (O (O (O (A (A (A 64 EA (A (fl (A H3 EA EA 69 EA ffl 69 (A EA Efl Efl 69 ER 69 Efl EA Z9 69 O� O O L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n+) N y N _ N N CO (0 O V 00 O 7 O"ZI, 0 N 0 M M 0 N (0 O V 0 (D n n (O (O c E E l0 00 O N N V O N V` N 0 (o m V O 00 00 V 0 t!) N O = (D m V (D 00 O M (O I-- O) 0 r- 0) 00 O M (0 r� O) h 0 (O co O = V 0 O O r- r C N N M M M V V V Nt (O O (O (D (D (D h 00 00 00 00 O O EA Efl (A (A (A 69 EA (A 6f3 EA fA 64 (A (fl (fl (A (A (A (A 64 69 (A Ei) EA (fl 69 0- N L O O O O CY O O O 0 O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 0 O m 3 m o 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N y = � d tC y m = o x y 0 0 0 0 00 CDC O 00 CC O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N d (fl (A (A (A 69 69 69 K3 6c9 w (A (fl 69 69 vi H9 (fl ER (fl (fl e4 (fl (f3 (A 6q cm 00 (00 0) (6 00 00 0 0 :°. 04 CIJ 04 ~ 0 0 0 0 co O O O O O O co O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O 0 00 oU) to CD co L d � o E 7 E Z W C 0 M O V 0 o g O t CO N 00 m M 0 N (D O't 0 (D 0 0 l0 In O U') 0 O N N V O N V I-- N 0 CO O V CO 0 D V 0 l0 N CL M O) 'T O 0 q M (0 f� O) l0 r- O 00 O M (O r" O) 1� 0 CO M 0) -Q 0 O V I- O M r` O M (D 0) M u) 0 N to O N (O 0 N u) N N N M M M V V V V (0 (0 t0 (D (D (D f- fZ fZ 0 0 0 0 41 O co (A (A 6'). 69 69 EA 69 69 69 (<) (A 69 fA 69 69 69 (A 69 64 69 (fl (A fA 69 V) (f3 0 ` OM r- 0 U t V (D O) M O OO M uO 0 (O u) (O N O N (O O (D O 't O co (0 h O N V (0 d) M t0 V (0 N 7 h O M (O m r l0 N O 00 y 6 N 0 d1 N (!) 0 l0 0 (O CO V O R r O V (D OO O N M N y= N N N M M M 7 V V (0 n (O (D CO (O f.- f-- N 00 0 00 0 O) O 0) CD 64 69 69 (A (i) EA ER 69 EA bs 64 EA ffi 69 69 60 (A (fl (f3 EA (f3 EA 69 69 (A 64 +L.+ N m N O 0 d M V 0 N CO O M M r 0 M N 0 O M� � � a Cii 3 d) V (0 0) ' O 0 M O 00 O 0 0 0 O N LO N O O M O 7 (fl - L0 0 O V F- M (fl O) N (0 N O 3 E (6 O 0 M O7 r- O N CA M N c 0) 'O J I� O N 0 a7 N 0 0 0 0 V (O 'Zi r- 0 N O't O CO O N O N N N M M M'IT 7 't LO (O (0 (0 (O (0 fl- f- I- 0 0 0 00 O O C O m 69 61). (fl 69 (Al 69 69 H9 69 69 69 64 (fl (A (<T (fl (A ER (f3 (fl 69 6-1 69 (s 69 69 O N r O o N 4) ° � 3 E 3 0 0 0 m 0 co Q 3 '00 0 H H > J 2i Q:E Q m N bA N cy MI O N M N r 4 N W J m Q Eo Z w IW � I� N J Q d J 2Q W J OW = U U Q (n 0 O o 00 co 0 � O N E v Lo N C� O G � co O O N s .r v C c @ LO 7 49 d M O O V4 N r � LO n N 3 m o M J � 00 N O U H o U Z z D Cl) O U W °o J cu y J L U J W 3 °' J � O z O i J M NA a N Cy Q Q O N M CD V N O W (D V N O W O LO M O W (D V N O (D N O O N (D N m M f- fl N co O Cl) m 00 N O N (D O V W I-- (D 00 O Cl) N W W O N M LO W V M I M V(C r W N O m W W rl M LO (O O .-- (D CO O Ih V N m (D M O W C`') O O) (D Cl) O r V' M O M ih LO U V V LO W (D I- 00 W O) �_ �_ N_ M M_ V LO (O (fl n W m m m O O C _O 64 6) d4 64 64 64 64 64 64 N N d4 64 69 63 64 d4 64 64 64 6s 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 2 2 L d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N M Y 2 O 2 dc(o CO O m W N O LO M N V O W LO 7 M N M V m W (D C LO m N (D LO m W N(o O O n O LO m M I� W W V M M M N LO (D N m LO — Ih �- r- V W V Cl! LO N C LO I� N M V LO 2 2 O N (D N h M 0) 7 O (D t� M h M m LO W N W �' O M W m N U C M M V V LO LO co r- r-- W W O O) O O N N M M� W W LO LO W 64 64 64 Cn 64 64 64 ER 64 64 64 64 604 p 64 64 64 fA ld4 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 co y, O O— O— O O:� O O O N O— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d N 69 N 0 2 y W W O V W O IT O v W N W O M N N W O V W W W LO LO (O o C (O W O N N O N V r,'-, N LO (coo m W W W 00 LO N (D m v (D W O M LO I� W r m O M LO I� O h W W M �_ m p 2 C � O 2 W O v r- O M (-: O M W m M LO W N (D O N LO W N W h O N N U C 7 N N N M M M V V V V l0 l0 LO CD (D (0 r- r.- h W W W W m m (A 6. 64 64 64 64 60 64 64 64 64 64 64 UA 69 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 6f 64 64 64 a o o - o - o o;:: o 0 0- o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m m _ C � O O M O N O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O (D O O N N t a N LO U) d � 2 O 2 N O O (D O co O O C O o 0 co O (D O O O O O O O O O O O O N (D 64 63 64 64 6J 64 64 64 64 64 EA 64 64 64 63 63 63 64 6) 64 64 O CD (o m co O V h V (D O LO M R m O O V V N Y 6) 64 N 64 64 N O 64 U) 0 0 00 O O O O O O 0 O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m O d N W co L d o m E a z E Z LU C co O It W O V O V W N W O M W N CO O C W W LO (O W 0 v m _W L() W O N N V O N V 1- N LO (D m V W co W V co LO N W m R CO W O M LO I� m l!) f� m W O M LO f� m 1� W W M m p -8 W O V I-- O M r- O M (D m M L) W N (D m N L0 W N LO h m N � N N N M M M� 7 a' � LO CO LO (O CO CO r r- r-- W W W W O m 64 6> 64 64 64 6> 64 6. 64 d4 64 69 64 63 d4 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 M f-- LO m O h LO m M N CD W O IT 00 N W 0 0 0 0 0(D 0 'OO C' CD m — CO O CO M LO W LO LO LO W O N LO I.- O (0 M O r-- � — O M LO i� O N V W m- M LO 7 (D N" ` m 7 M (fl m ` LO N O 0 E y 2 m N LO O N LO 00 LO 00 LO (D V 1.- O V I- O V (D 00 O N Cl) N y N N N M M M � I LO to W) (D (D (o h h r- W co co W m m m 64 ER 6) 6e 63, 64 63 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 6k 64 64 6.4 EA 64 63 64 64 6, 64 64 L- C � 0) O N (D o N CO V 00 N (D O m M I-- 0 0) f- LO m M 1- @ a cp 3 m V W m V O W M (D W O LO LO W O N LO f-- O W M O r V LO (fl m W '7 r m W E m O W c r' O N V M LO CO N M N 3, J r- m N LO m N o W LO W 4 (D V f-- O V f- O V (D 00 O N "O O N N N M M M R V IT LO LO LO W W (D h r- r- W W W 00 m m O O 64 64 64 64 64 Cfl 64 64 64 64 64 64 Efl 64 64 64 d4 614 614 64 64 64 64 64 64 64 03 O N r T O O Q a c 0 4) a E E (o m 3 S O O 3 6 o m m m c 0 m L > 3 v a O > J 2 Q Q m M NA a N Cy Q Q O N M M' r 4 N W J m i H z W O N d W W Q III YJ Q Q az N W WQ ICI Z 2 U) ca M 0 O O 00 IT 69 0 O N E Iq v 9 C °' N c� O CD G � co O O N m co w O o 6 d N o 6R fA a) 0) 7 ?) LO 69 m O 3 U) N O J tt') d O U H 00 U Z v z LO O U a W N h J c J cm U) O U' U N m J W o 0 J D 5O s co \N bA a N Q N M (D 7 N O W (R7 N 0 M O (O M O W (D 7 N 0 (o N O O m CD N O M I� N (D O M m W N m N (D O 7 M� O M m M N M (O O N N O N F CO O 7 M (O (M 7 (O I- N N c O 00 aD n 0 (D M O f.- 7 N m (D M O M M O M (0 M O r- 7 M O M N (0 7 l0 O O H 00 W O O �- N M M 7 In CD CD i� W O m m O O 69 69 Efl 69 69 69 W> 69 69 N N EA 64 69 69 69 69 (A 69 (A 69 69 69 69 09, (4 69 69 N O O O O N O O N O 0 CD 0 0 0 CD — 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 N M � _ O = 61 M O O m N O CO m N 7 m (D LO 7 M N M 7 m (O (0 (0 CO m N O CO m CO N (0 O O r O (f) m M f� .- In W 7 M M M N (O CD N m (n -: r,- 7 I� 7 O 7 m (O N 00 l0 h N M 7 (O = O N (D N 1- M m 7 0 O r CO I- M m m N CO 7 0 M O O N CS, (,> C M m 7 lO tO (D r n W W m O O O �_ N N M M 7 Lo (0 (O (O CD (!> 6q 69 69 6`4 69 69 613 69 69 69 69 69 O 69 EYi 69 Efi Ef3 69 69 69 Efl Ef3 to 69 fA L O O O O O O O h —0 N O O O N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (h Y = 6s N O 2 y 00 (O O R CO 0 7 0 7 CO N CO m M 00 N (D 0 7 CO (D () In () U o E (0 W O N N 7 N 7 f� N lf7 O O 7 (D W W 7 W (0 N m 7 O 00 O Cc:)) (0 � O CO r m 00 O M (0 h m h 00 m M a- m O .- _ m � = V 00 O OM 0 C N N M M 7 7 7 7 (O CO � (O (D CD I- N� 00 M M M O O (fl 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 69 69 69 6S 69 69 6i1 6q 69 69 69 69 69 6A Ef3 d y_ O O O O M O O 0 O r O O O (O N O O O O O O O O O O (r @ C = _� 0 H N O O O O N 0 0 7 N 0 m O O O M 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0(D O O y L � d (0 N d O = O m y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W N O N O 0 0 00 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m (D 47 69 69 v). 69 CO 69 69 O N 69 M (f) 69 69 00 (O 69 (A 69 69 6rT 69 69 69 69 69 O m (O r (O W 7 (0 O (9 3' N (D co m 00 O O 00 (a m 0) ;; CIJ to C-) M M N I� O O Efl Ef3 Efi F 0 0 0 0 Cl) 0 0 It M 0 0 0 O O h (O Co Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co O m t0 N N (n ( O O y N O E a 7 E Z UJ m O O 7 00 O It O IT 00 N M M M M N CD Cl 7 W (D (n (O m (O N 0) (O W O N N 7 O N 7 N N (O CD M 7 (D M 00 7 W (O N CL O m 7 'Cl W O M (n h m tO �(0 CO O M (O f-1 m h cq (D M m 7 -8 W O 7 I, O M r O CO (O m M (O 00 N (0 m N CO 00 N (O r-- m N �. N N N m M M 7 It 7 7 (0 (0 (O (D (D (D I- h h 00 00 00 00 O O (A 69 69 69 69 69 69 V) 69 (A 69 EA V-1 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 EA 69 69 69 69 69 CO I� (O O O I' r CO m CM N O (D O 7 00 N (D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -OO .0 7 m m M 0 00 CO (O CO U) 0 (O 00 O N (O f- O O M O N 7— O Lm M (0 � O N 7( m M (O 7 (D N 7 P- m— M (c O n L0 N O W E (n O N (O m N (0 00 In co LO (0 7 N O 7 N O 7 (D 00 O N m N y= N N N Cl) M M 7 7 7 (O (O Cn (D (D O h N t` 00 00 00 CO m O O @ 69 609,69 6q 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 N 69 w 69 69 69 69 d3 L„ N = 0) O 0 M 7 N N (D O m M f- 0 m I- (0 m m I- e- W d Cf .; m 7 (D m 7 0 00 m (D m O lO (O O N t0 N O m (O 00 O 7 f` m M M m f- In N O 3 m O OJ M m r O N 7 M N .'- N 'O N (O O N (O 00 (0 00 7 (D 7 i-- 0 7 h 0 7 O cd O N O N N N M M M 7 7 7 l0 (O (0 O (D (D I- n� c0 00 00 W or m b9 C O 69 (» (» (» (» (A (19 69 (A 69 69 69 69 69 (fl 69 69 to 69 to to to 69 EA ER Co O >, ° O (n O- d 0 E 3 E o O o L @ m �a O O ° 0 2 ¢ m \N bA a N Q N M EO NO TABLE 24 -14 HOUSING DEMAND AND AFFORDABILITY THRESHOLDS HACIENDA LAKES DRI Q:'.2005`050150.02.01 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP 0003 DRI - ADA`Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support, Hearings`.Q24,Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 15 Affordability Thresholds Housing Income Range Owner Renter Demand Very Low $17,893 - $19,343 $59,467 $415 23 $19,344 - $22,567 $66,933 $474 69 $22,568 - $25,791 $77,231 $554 83 $25,792 - $29,015 $87,528 $635 4 $29,016 - $32,239 $97,826 $716 120 $32,240 - $35,400 $108,023 $796 30 Total Very Low 329 Low $35,401 - $38,687 $118,320 $876 0 $38,689 - $41,911 $128,719 $957 63 $41,913 - $45,135 $139,017 $1,038 42 $45,137 - $48,359 $149,315 $1,119 0 $48,361 - $51,583 $159,612 $1,199 11 $51,585 - $55,452 $170,940 $1,288 3 $54,809 - $56,650 $178,002 $1,343 0 Total Low 119 Moderate $56,651 - $61,256 $188,299 $1,424 1 $61,257 - $64,480 $200,803 $1,522 134 $64,481 - $67,704 $211,101 $1,602 16 $67,705 - $70,928 $221,399 $1,683 0 $70,929 - $74,152 $231,696 $1,764 0 $74,153 - $77,376 $241,994 $1,844 0 $77,377 - $80,600 $252,292 $1,925 0 $80,601 - $84,960 $264,404 $2,020 0 Total Moderate 150 Above Moderate $84,961 - $86,730 $274,193 $2,096 0 $86,731 - $88,500 $279,846 $2,140 0 $88,501 - $90,270 $285,500 $2,185 0 $90,271 - $92,040 $291,153 $2,229 0 $92,041 - $93,810 $296,807 $2,273 0 Total Above Moderate 0 Total Demand 599 Source: RERC; ECFRPC Q:'.2005`050150.02.01 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP 0003 DRI - ADA`Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support, Hearings`.Q24,Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 15 TABLE 24 -15 COMPARISON OF TOTAL HOUSING DEMAND TO AVAILABILITY SUPPLY HACIENDA LAKES DRI C•. Source: RERC; ECFRPC Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP,0003 DRI - ADA Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SuppomHearings\Q24 Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 16 Owner Renter Owner Renter Total Very Low $17,893 - $19,343 23 $59,467 $415 18 37 55 32 $19,344 - $22,567 69 $66,933 $474 19 15 34 (35) $22,568 - $25,791 83 $77,231 $554 17 29 46 (37) $25,792 - $29,015 4 $87,528 $635 16 32 48 44 $29,016 - $32,239 120 $97,826 $716 22 60 82 (38) $32,240 - $35,400 30 $108,023 $796 25 80 105 75 Subtotal 329 117 253 370 41 Low $35,401 - $38,687 0 $118,320 $876 39 204 243 243 $38,689 - $41,911 63 $128,719 $957 32 164 196 133 $41,913 - $45,135 42 $139,017 $1,038 69 43 112 70 $45,137 - $48,359 0 $149,315 $1,119 36 86 122 122 $48,361 - $51,583 11 $159,612 $1,199 29 43 72 61 $51,585 - $55,452 3 $170,940 $1,288 45 103 148 145 $54,809 - $56,650 0 $178,002 $1,343 15 60 75 75 Subtotal 119 265 702 967 848 Moderate $56,651 - $61,256 1 $188,299 $1,424 36 60 96 95 $61,257 - $64,480 134 $200,803 $1,522 85 9 94 (40) $64,481 - $67,704 16 $211,101 $1,602 39 9 48 32 $67,705 - $70,928 0 $221,399 $1,683 48 9 57 57 $70,929 - $74,152 0 $231,696 $1,764 32 9 41 41 $74,153 - $77,376 0 $241,994 $1,844 28 9 37 37 $77,377 - $80,600 0 $252,292 $1,925 35 9 44 44 $80,601 - $84,960 0 $264,404 $2,020 17 9 26 26 Subtotal 150 320 122 442 292 Above $84,961 - $86,730 0 $274,194 $2,096 9 9 17 17 Moderate $86,731 $88,500 0 $279,846 $2,140 9 9 17 17 $88,501 $90,270 0 $285,500 $2,185 16 9 25 25 $90,271 $92,040 0 $291,153 $2,229 19 9 28 28 $92,041 $93,810 0 $296,807 $2,273 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 0 52 36 88 88 Total 599 754 1,113 1,867 1,268 C•. Source: RERC; ECFRPC Q: \2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP,0003 DRI - ADA Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SuppomHearings\Q24 Question 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 16 �� TABLE 24 -16 RELEVANT EMPLOYMENT CATEGORY BY NAICS CODE, COLLIER COUNTY HACIENDA LAKES DR[ ® 595 Source: ES202, Collier County; RERC Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda takes MPUD - DRI- ERM003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q24 \Ques1ion 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 17 23 Construction $13,957 44515 238 Specialty trade contractors $9,810 39595 237 Heavy and civil engineering construction $1,258 54719 236 Construction of buildings $2,889 56774 519 Other Information Services 13957 $61,721 Retail Trade 2,069 $62,699 44 -45 Retail Trade 18,044 $28,601 441 Motor vehicle and parts dealers 2,090 $44,858 442 Furniture and home furnishings stores 987 $33,685 443 Electronics and appliance stores 462 $28,126 444 Building material and garden supply stores 1,822 $34,411 445 Food and beverage stores 3,639 $25,154 446 Health and personal care stores 1,038 $34,838 447 Gasoline stations 676 $21,519 448 Clothing and clothing accessories stores 2,458 $22,755 451 Sporting goods, hobby, book and music stores 581 $18,787 452 General merchandise stores 3,209 $24,212 453 Miscellaneous store retailers 938 $23,013 454 Nonstore retailers 145 $34,833 7221 Full- service restaurants 8,315 $19,930 7222 Limited- service eating places 2,329 $15,516 7223 Special food services 424 $24,887 7224 Drinking places, alcoholic beverages 162 $15,184 6114 Business, computer and management training 29,275 $56,652 Medical Office 47 $54,570 6211 Offices of physicians 2,814 $84,572 ® 6213 Offices of other health practitioners 590 $39,675 6214 Outpatient care centers 755 $47,008 6215 Medical and diagnostic laboratories 168 $52,452 6216 Home health care services 672 $37,766 4,999 ® 595 Source: ES202, Collier County; RERC Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda takes MPUD - DRI- ERM003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q24 \Ques1ion 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 17 Office 511 Publishing industries, except Internet 799 $63,651 512 Motion picture and sound recording industries 123 $22,115 517 Telecommunications 601 $51,528 519 Other Information Services 78 $61,721 522 Credit intermediation and related activities 2,069 $62,699 523 Securities, commodity contracts, investments 866 $161,683 524 Insurance carriers and related activities 976 $64,648 525 Funds, trusts, and other financial vehicles 10 $59,982 531 Real estate 2,733 $41,254 532 Rental and leasing services 395 $40,989 541 Professional and technical services 4,691 $62,581 551 Management of companies and enterprises 650 $139,316 561 Administrative and support services 8,535 $29,336 562 Waste management and remediation services 282 $44,191 22,808 Accommodations 7211 Traveler accommodation 4,690 $31,779 7213 Rooming and boarding houses 4,690 Education 6111 Elementary and secondary schools 6113 Colleges and universities 438 $40,796 6114 Business, computer and management training 16 $56,652 6115 Technical and trade schools 47 $54,570 6116 Other schools and instruction 56 $23,021 6117 Educational support services 38 $29,631 ® 595 Source: ES202, Collier County; RERC Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda takes MPUD - DRI- ERM003 DR] - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q24 \Ques1ion 24 Housing.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q24 Pg. 17 aQUESTION 25 — POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (16); POLICY (1) GOAL 18); POLICIES (1), (3), (4), (6) A. If police /fire service, facilities or sites will be dedicated or otherwise provided on -site, describe them, specify any conditions of dedication and locate on Map H. Response: There are no police /fire service facilities or sites proposed on the site as part of the Hacienda Lakes DRI. A 1.33 EMS site on Lord's Way Road is provided which will allow quicker response times in the development and surrounding area and help alleviate the strain on already busy surrounding units. This public facility site is identified as "PF" on Map H. The donation of the one acre site shall be by deed to Collier County and is subject to an Emergency Medical Services Impact Fee credit based on the fair market value of the donated property. The valuation of the one acre site dedication shall be determined by an appraisal, and shall occur at the time the 500th residential unit is included in a development order request (site development plan, or plat), subsequent to the adoption of the DRI Development Order. B. Provide correspondence from the appropriate providers acknowledging notice of the proposed development and phasing, and indicating whether present facilities and Qmanpower are capable of serving the project or specifying the additional manpower /equipment necessary to serve the development. If the provider is from another jurisdiction, the letter should also identify any non - facility related problems in providing said service. Response: Please see the service availability letters. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Supporl\Hearings \Q25 \Question 25 Police and Fire (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q25 Pg. 1 SHERIFF KEVIN J. RAMBOSK Collier County Sheri ft's Office February 24, 2010 RWA Consulting 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 Re: Letter of Commitment To whom it may concern: This correspondence will serve as a letter of commitment for Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC proposed new development located east of Collier Boulevard, intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, within Section 12, 13, 14, 23, 24 and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The Collier County Sheriffs Office is currently able to provide law enforcement services for the proposed project as it proceeds to the construction phase. As the project approaches build out the agency will be challenged to provide adequate levels of service Current constraints on funding related to the recent reductions of the Agency's budget will limit our ability to adequately service the addition of 1739 residential dwelling units. The numbers of added housing units will bring with them additional call for service generators. As density is increased in the area, additional agency resources and funding will be required to maintain current service levels. Respectfully, Gre Smith Chief of Administration • 7 ry . 3301 Tamiarni Trail East Bldg. J, Naples, FL 34112 -4902 phone • 239.774.4434 colliersheriff.org MAR 01 2010 BY: a Co Ter CoUnt y Bureau of Emergency Services April 29, 2010 Ms. Anna Rosa Planning Coordinator RWA Consulting, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 RE: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Service Availability Request for DRI Dear Ms. Rosa: ECEIVE MAY 0 3 2010 BY. - This is in response to your request for Service Availability for the above captioned project. After reviewing the site and location maps you provided, we have determined that this project in its entirety falls outside our service standard response time of eight minutes or less. Should you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Jeff Page, Chief Emergency Medical Services �S B075 Lely Cultural Parkway, Suite 267 • Naples, Florida 34113.239- 252 -3740 - Fax 239 - 252 -3298 • www.colliergov.net/ems BTE GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE DISTRICT 14575 Collier Boulevard - Naples, FL 34119 - (239) 348 -7540 - (239) 348 -7546 FAX F http: /lwww.ggfire.com ECEIVE April 29, 2010 MAY 0 3 2010 BY: Anna Rosa Planning Coordinator RWA Consulting, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34109 Subject: Fire Service Availability Dear Ms. Rosa: This letter is to confirm that the Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District currently provides protection and will continue to provide fire protection and rescue services, for the portion of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC that is north of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, Florida. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (239) 348 -7450. Sincerely, Robert D. Metzg Fire Chief RDM /sm Our Family Protecting Yours East Naples Fire Control & Rescue District 0 FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU 5001 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34113 Phone: (239) 774 -2800, Fax: (239) 774 -3116, nbiondo @enfd.org February 25, 2010 Ms. Anna Rosa, Planning Coordinator 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34109 Dear Ms. Rosa: This is to confirm that the East Naples Fire Department will provide fire protection services at the following project: Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC Sections 12, 13, 141 23, 24, and 25 Township 50 South, Range 26E Collier County, Florida Please be advised that Golden Gate Fire Control and Rescue District also provides fire protection service to this area. Please contact them for an availability letter as well. If I can be of any fitrther assistance, please don't hesitate to give me a call at 774 -2800. Sincerely, Nick Biondo Deputy Chief ECEIVE .: MAR 01 2010 Br: 0 QUESTION 26 — RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (16); POLICY (1) GOAL (18); POLICIES (1), (3),(4),(6) EXISTING LEVEL OF SERVICE: ADOPTED LEVEL OF SERVICES STANDARD: LEVEL OF SERVICE AFTER PROJECT BUILDOUT: A. Describe the recreational facilities and open space (including acreage) which will be provided on -site. Locate on Map H. Identify which of these areas or facilities will be open to the general public. Response: Recreational facilities and open space will include the Swamp Buggy, Junior Deputy passive recreational area, lakes, trails and preserves, as well as community recreation and social spaces integrated into the residential development areas. Map H locates the preserves, lakes, passive recreation site, and the attraction (Swamp Buggy), but does not include open spaces within individual tracts. The following land uses would be permitted in the Junior Deputy Tract of the Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development: Principal Uses: 1. Open space and recreational uses; 2. Hiking, biking, fishing, boating, camping, picnicking and nature trails; 3. Sporting and recreational camps; 4. Caretaker's residence, limited to one for the JD designated area; 5. Wetland preserves; 6. Upland preserves. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, pavilions, viewing piers, viewing platforms, educational signs, kiosks, and docks or platforms for launching and mooring or storage of non - motorized vessels utilizing movable storage racks; 2. Covered camping pavilion(s) (i.e.: concrete, or similar hard surface, that is roofed, and may, or may not be enclosed with screen /plastic sheeting, or walls), which may include kitchen/cooking facilities, office Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q26 \Question 26 Recreation and Open Space (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q26 Pg.1 aand restroom facilities; 3. Passive parks and passive recreational uses; 4. Pervious roads, driveways, and pervious and/or impervious parking facilities; 5. Project identification and directional signage; 6. Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements; 7. Restrooms/bath houses; 8. Roofed or unroofed storage for maintenance and recreational equipment; 9. Fencing and security gates, which may include barbed wire; 10. Archery and air rifle range(s). B. Will the development remove from public access lands or waters previously used by residents of the region for hunting, fishing, boating or other recreation uses? Specify. Response: No. Recreation hunting may have occurred on the private owned lands. This opportunity will continue through the dedication of high quality natural areas intended to be conveyed to the State which will provide for public access to the State lands. C. Will parks and open space be dedicated to the City or county? If not, who will maintain the facilities. Response: No, the open space will not be dedicated to either the City or the County. However, up to 1544 acres of natural preserve area is intended to be dedicated to the State. The Hacienda Lakes DRI will provide a long -term restoration and maintenance program. D. Please describe how the proposed recreation and open space plan is consistent with local and regional policies. Response: The development of the Hacienda Lakes DRI will be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan through the implementation of the County's Transfer of Development Rights program (TDR). The criteria for utilizing the TDR program will address the goals of the Natural Resources Element of the Strategic Regional Policy Plan through implementation of restoration, provision for maintenance, and dedication of high quality natural areas. The lands intended to be dedicated to the State will Q provide for recreation opportunities and open spaces as contemplated by the local and regional policy. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q26 \Question 26 Recreation and Open Space (dean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q26 Pg.2 E. Does the project have the potential for impacting a recreation trail designated pursuant to Chapter 260, F.S., and Chapter 16 D -7, F.A. C.? If so, describe the potential impact. Response: The Hacienda Lakes DRI will not impact a recreation trail designated pursuant to Chapter 260, F. S., and Chapter 16D -7, F.A.C. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI- ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support \Hearings \Q26 \Question 26 Recreation and Open Space (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q26 Pg.3 C•. QUESTION 27 — EDUCATION State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (16); POLICY (1) GOAL (18); POLICIES (1), (3), (4), (6) A. If the development contains residential units, estimate the number of school age children expected to reside in the development. Use class breakdowns appropriate to the area in which the development is located (specify on chart below): Response: The estimated number of school age students per class that is expected to reside in the development is summarized in Table 27 -2. The Collier County School Concurrency Student Generation Rates, as approved as part of the Collier County Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Concurrency, were utilized to determine the number of students expected in the development. These rates are based on the number and type of residential housing units. As shown below, the 1,056 multi - family dwelling units proposed at Hacienda Lakes could generate a wide range of students based on the type of multifamily housing that is developed. Based on conditions in Collier County and southwest Florida, a 4:1 ratio of condominium to apartment units for all multi - family dwellings is typical of what can be supported by the market, and is therefore a relevant expectation of the type of multi - family that can be anticipated for the DRI. Therefore, it was assumed that the 1,056 multi - family dwelling ® units proposed in the Hacienda Lakes DRI will consist of 211 apartment units (20 %) and 845 condominium units (80 %). Table 27 -1 identifies the adopted Student Generation Rates and the number and type of residential housing units proposed in the development. Table 27 -2 identifies the estimated number of school age students per class that is expected to reside in the development based on the projected buildout; however, the table includes a maximum number of students, in parenthesis, that could be generated if 100% of the multifamily units were developed as apartments. 1#1 Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q27 \Question 27 Education.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q27 Pg.1 C 0 TABLE 27 -1 STUDENT GENERATION RATES AND RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS HACIENDA LAKES DRI Single Family Multi - Family Multi - Family Units Apartment Units Condo Units Elementary 0.16 0.20 0.02 10.54 (18.70) Middle 0.10 0.08 0.01 47.82 (75.00) High 0.12 0.09 0.01 47.82 (75.00) Year Single Family Multi - Family Multi - Family Total 2016 Units Apartment Units Condo Units 55.18 (102.75) 2012 20 6 24 50 2013 100 20 80 200 2014 100 20 80 200 2015 100 35 140 275 2016 100 35 140 275 2017 100 35 140 275 2018 100 35 140 275 2019 84 25 101 210 TOTAL 704 211 845 1760 TABLE 27 -2 STUDENT ALLOCATION BY LEVEL HACIENDA LAKES DRI Elementary Middle High School Year School Total Students Students Students 2012 4.88 (9.20) 2.72 (4.40) 2.94 (5.10) 10.54 (18.70) 2013 21.60 (36.00) 12 -40 (18.00) 13.82 (21.00) 47.82 (75.00) 2014 21.60 (36.00) 12.40 (18.00) 13.82 (21.00) 47.82 (75.00) 2015 25.80 (51.00) 14.20 (24.00) 15.18 (27.75) 55.18 (102.75) 2016 25.80 (51.00) 14.20 (24.00) 15.18 (27.75) 55.18 (102.75) 2017 25.80 (51.00) 14.20 (24.00) 15.18 (27.75) 55.18 (102.75) 2018 25.80 (51.00) 14.20 (24.00) 15.18 (27.75) 55.18 (102.75) 2019 20.50 (38.64) 11.42 (18.48) 12.37 (21.42) 44.29 (78.54) TOTAL 171.78 (323.84) 95.74 (154.88) 103.66 (179.52) 371.18 (658.24) B. Will school facilities or sites be dedicated or otherwise provided on the site? Response: The applicant has agreed to provide a 15- to 20 -acre site for a future 919 - student elementary school, which is identified on Map H. Q: \2005,050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA,.Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings\Q27 \Question 27 Education.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q27 Pg.2 �01 LM J C. Attach a letter from the appropriate School Board, acknowledging receipt of the estimated school age population information in (A) above, and providing a statement of hat capital improvement adjustments would be necessary to accommodate these students. Response: The Collier County School Board has received the estimated school age population information generated in (A) above and has provided a letter finding that the mitigation measures to proposed to provide public school capacity are acceptable. The School Board letter is included as a companion item to Question 27. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA SupponAearings \Q27 \Question 27 Education.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q27 Pg.3 �acienda LaLe5 Of NapIC5 August 16, 2010 Amy Taylor Long Range Planner Collier County School Board 5775 Osceola Trail Naples, FL 34109 Re: Hacienda Lakes DRI /MPUD Dear Amy, I am writing in regards to the Hacienda Lakes DRI / MPUD. As you are aware, we have submitted development applications for our project to the Regional Planning Council and Collier County for review. We have also been discussing with the Collier County School Board the projected capacity of school facilities in the vicinity of the project. We have held several discussions aimed at developing an appropriate mitigation proposal that addresses the demand on school facilities created by the residential units to be constructed in our development. Hacienda Lakes shall provide a parcel within its development to serves as the future location of an elementary school for the project and other nearby residents. The school site shall include the following characteristics: a. it will have a size of approximately 15 to 20 acres that may developed as a school site with water and sewer connection availability, and that any wetland impacts in the site be approved by the permitting agencies and fully mitigated by the developer. b, It will provide for enough space to fit the latest School District prototype or similar design that provides capacity for 919 students. Such prototype was recently used in the construction of the Mike Davis Elementary. c. The property shall be able to fit the noted prototype building or similar design as well as other facility requirements such as parking, water management, recreational facilities, etc:. d. The property shall have direct legal access and will be zoned to allow for the school use as part of the overall approval for the hacienda Lakes DRI /MPUD e. The property will be located in lands designated Urban Residential Fringe in the Future Land Use Element (West of the 1 mile line from CR951) f. The property shall be located towards the center of the project such that no resident within the development is any farther than 1.5 miles from the school. S. The developer of Hacienda Lakes shall attempt to keep the frontage road between the school site and other uses to remain at 2 lanes In order to allow for safer conditions for children walking to school. 6610 Willow Park Dr,, z,' f=loor I Napier, rL 3 -r1 og I Tcl: 87 7 -557 -13 271 1 Fax: 877 -)5T -8271 Q Hacienda I-aLe5 of Naples Facienda Lakes shall be compensated for the school site via impact fees credits of an amount to be determined upon a land valuation taking place under a mutually agreed land appraisal mechanism. The agreed upon impact fee credit shall be set forth in a Tri -Marty Developer Contribution Agreement to he fully executed within two (2) years of the date that the Hacienda lakes DRI /MPUD is approved for development. Upon execution of such Tri -Party Developer Contribution Agreement, it is anticipated that the dedication of land and improvements shall meet the impact of the development on school capacity. The School District staff shall use its best efforts to plan for the completion of capacity so as to not delay the development of homes at the Hacienda takes DRI /MPUD, subject to the approval of its Hoard. We are hereby requesting that you provide us a letter confirming that based on the above proposal, the School District would not object to the approval of the Hacienda Lakes DRI /MPUD. As noted during our meeting, it would also be helpful if the School District would provide confirmation that the proposed development of 704 single family units and 1056 multifamily units is expected to produce between 134 and 324 elementary school students. 134 is the estimate if all multifamily units are developed as condominiums and 324 is the estimate if all multifamily units where to be developed as apartments. This information will aid in determining the traffic impacts created by the school. We thank you for your cooperation throughout this process. 66 I o Willow F'a,�Dr., 2 "d Floor I Naflics, F1 3 -1-1 O9 ( Ted: 877 -357 -827 1 1 Fax: 577- 357 -8271 Strict Schow �VICollier C0111�� OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 5775 Osceola Trail Naples, Florida 34109 -0919 (239)3 7-0240 (239) 377 -0231 FAX September 1, 2010 Mr. David E. Torres 6610 Willow Park Dr. 2 "d Floor Naples, FL 34109 DIRECTOR Re: Hacienda Lakes DRLWUD Requirements Dear Mr. Torres, It has been a pleasure working with you regarding the public school requirements of the future residents of the Hacienda Lakes community. As stated in your attached letter to our long range planner, Amy Taylor, dated August 16, 2010, the Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD has committed to dedicating a 15 -20 acre elementary school site to the School District within the Hacienda Lakes community with the following characteristics: a. A minimum of 15 to 20 developable acres with wetland impact in the site approved by permitting agencies. b. Water and sewer connections available at site. c. Site will be able to accommodate typical 900 + /- student capacity elementary school, with other facility requirements such as parking, water management, recreational facilities, etc. d. Site will be zoned for School use as part of the overall approval for the Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD. e. Site location will be in lands designated Urban Residential Fringe in the County's Future Land Use Element, (West of the one mile line east from County Road 951. f. Students residing within the project will be within 1.5 miles of the site. g. The developer shall attempt to keep the school's frontage road(s) to remain at 2 lanes for safer walking conditions. h. The site will have direct legal access to a public right of way. The School District's acceptance of the dedication will be contingent upon School Board approval and a satisfactory site feasibility study demonstrating that the land is suitable for the School District's intended use as an elementary school site with appropriate environmental conditions, usable acreage and direct legal access. COLLIER COUNTY CHARACTER EDUCATION TRAITS Citizenship Cooperation Honesty Kindness Patriotism Perseverance Respect Responsibility Self - Control Tolerance THE COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM IS AN EQUALACCESS / EQUAL OPPORTUNITY INSTITUTON FOR EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT, While it is anticipated that there will be no concurrency issues at the time of development it must be understood that the development will be subject to school concurrency at the time of site development plan review. A preliminary school impact analysis estimating the total number of students by housing type generated by the Hacienda Lakes DRVMPUD is estimated in the table below. Pr000sal: Estimated Number of Students Generated by Housing Type Dwelling Unit Type Units Elementary Middle High Total Students Single.Family 704 112.64 70.40 84.48 267.52 Multifamily 1056 211.20 84.48 95.04 390.72 Mobile Home Con I do/Coop 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Govemment Total 1760 324 155 180 658 With the commitments as stipulated in your letter, there is no objection to the Hacienda Lakes DRUMPUD proposal. In addition, the School District agrees,subject to School Board approvat that Hacienda Lakes shall be compensated for the school site via impact fee credits as set forth in a Tri-party Developer Contribution Agreement, the amount determined upon land valuation under a mutually agreed land appraisal mechanism. Thank you for your cooperation and support regarding this matter. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (239) 377 -0245. Sincerely, Alvah Hardy, II Executive Director Cc: Michele LaBute, Chief Operational Officer Thomas G. Eastman, Director Amy Taylor, Long Range Planner Attachment [A QUESTION 28 — HEALTH CARE State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (6); POLICY (2) GOAL (16); POLICY (1) A. Describe the health care services and facilities that will be required to meet the health needs generated by this project. Please provide a letter from the various providers acknowledging notice of the proposed development and ability to serve the project. Response: Please see attached service availability request letter. Q;\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q28 \Question 28 Health Care.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q28 Pg.1 LM.0 PHYSICIANS REGIONAL KW HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, P A T H W A Y S To HE A L I N G March 1 V", 2010 RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 Re: Letter of Service Availability Dear Sir: I understand your firth is in the process of preparing a Development of Regional Impact submittal on behalf of Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC. This correspondence serves as a letter of service availability for Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC and its proposed new development located east of Collier Boulevard, intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road, within Section 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, and 25, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida and Sections 19 and 30, Township 50 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. Upon review of the site and location parameters that you provided to us, we have determined that this development project falls entirely within the service area of Physicians Regional - Collier Boulevard. As such, Physicians Regional - Collier Boulevard intends to be available to provide necessary medical services to the development. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or if you require additional information. Sincerely, Chief Executive Officer Collier Boulevard Campus • 8300 Collier Blvd., Naples, FL 34114 • (239) 3S4 -6000 Pine Ridge Campus • 6101 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34119 (239) 348 -4000 www.PhysiciansRegional.com Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 29 ENERGY 1? «TA Nl--- Visualiratiun Ll I L � F ng \ S t T. 1 _J � S, n'Iylll g G QUESTION 29 — ENERGY State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (11); POLICY (4) GOAL (18); POLICIES (1), (5), (6) As an option to responding to this question in its entirety, please respond to question D. Provide a response in the following or a similar format, with those items appropriately (residential vs non residential) to that as follows. Response: The proposed GMPA and DRI comply with HB 697, which promotes energy efficiency and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The amendment allows for energy efficient land use patterns in that the proposed development preserves 1,544 acres of land while limiting the footprint for new development to approximately 647 acres. The development area is focused in areas designated as urban residential fringe, with the most intense uses oriented adjacent to existing development. The developed areas include a mix of residential uses, including single family, apartment and condominiums, as well as medical and commercial uses, an existing attraction, and a centrally located elementary school. This mix of uses allows for adequate jobs -to- housing balance, and will reduce the number of automobile trips and minimize vehicle miles traveled by residents, employees and students. The neighborhoods will be developed with multi -modal street system that can accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists, thereby promoting alternative modes of transportation and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The DRI will not include any regulatory provisions, homeowner association covenants or deed restrictions that will prohibit energy efficient building designs or the production of alternative energy sources. Specifically, the Development of Regional Impact, Hacienda Lakes will incorporate the following energy conservation features: a. Provision of a bicycle /pedestrian system connecting all land uses, to be placed along arterial and collector roads within the project. This system is to be consistent with local government requirements. b. Provisions of bicycle racks or storage facilities in recreational, commercial, and multi - family residential areas. C. Cooperation in the locating of bus stops, shelters, and other passenger and system accommodations for a transit system to serve the project area. d. Use of energy - efficient features in window design. e. Use of operable windows and ceiling fans. 0 f. Installation of energy- efficient appliances and equipment. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q29 \Question 29 Energy (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q29 Pg.1 g. Prohibition of deed restrictions or covenants that would prevent or unnecessarily hamper energy conservation. h. Reduced coverage by asphalt, concrete, rock, and similar substances in streets, parking lots, and other areas to reduce local air temperatures and reflecting light and heat. i. Installation of energy - efficient lighting for streets, parking areas, recreation areas, and other interior and exterior public areas. j. Use of water closets with a maximum flush of 1.6 gallons and shower heads and faucets with a maximum flow rate of 2.5 gallons per minute (at 80 pounds of water pressure per square inch.) k. Selection of native plants, trees, and other vegetation and landscape design features that reduce requirements for water, fertilizer, maintenance, and other needs. 1. Planting of native shade trees to provide reasonable shade for all recreation areas, streets, and parking areas. M. Placement of trees to provide needed shade in the warmer months while not Qoverly reducing the benefits of sunlight in the cooler moths. n n. Planting of native shade trees for each residential unit. o. Orientation of structures, as possible, to reduce solar heat gain by walls and to utilize to natural cooling effects of the wind. P. Provision for structural shading wherever practical when natural shading cannot be used effectively. q. Inclusion of porch/patio areas in residential units. r. Consideration by the project architectural review committee(s) of energy conservation measurements (both those noted here and others) to assist builders and residents in their efforts to achieve greater energy efficiency in the development. Q 0005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI- ERP\0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppor1\Hearings \Q29\Question 29 Energy (clean).docx 3/4/2011 ADA Q29 Pg.2 Hacienda Lakes DRI Application Submittal QUESTION 30 HISTORICAL & ARCHAEOLOGICAL Planning Visualiza�ion CONS U I_ 'I 1NG Engineering 1 \ t 11 .JL S—p.g QUESTION 30 — HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (19); POLICIES (3), (4), (5), (6) GOAL (22); POLICY(3) GOAL (24); POLICY(3) A. 1. Describe any known historical or archaeological sites on the development site. Provide a letter from the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources (DHR) which includes a list of known sites within the development site, the likelihood of historical or archaeological sites occurring within the development site, whether a site survey is needed, and whether any known sites are significant. Response: The Archaeological and Historical Conservancy performed a Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Hacienda Lakes Parcel (Exhibit 30.A.1). This assessment located the previously recorded Hunting Camp Hammock Site (8CR556) and four previously unrecorded prehistoric sites: the Clamshell Cove Midden Site (8CR878), the White Shell Hammock Site (8CR879), the Deep Marsh Hammock Site (8CR880) and the Jump -Start Hammock Site (8CR881). ® These five sites are of local significance. Additionally, the Hunting Camp Hammock Site (8CR556), the Clamshell Cove Midden Site (8CR878) and the Jump -Start Hammock Site (8CR881) are potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Hacienda Lakes Parcel prepared by the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy was submitted to the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources. The letter received from the Division of Historical Resources has been attached as Exhibit 30.A.2. 2. If DHR recommends that a site survey be done, the result of such a survey, conducted for the development site by an acceptable professional, should be provided. Response: The Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Hacienda Lakes Parcel prepared by the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy is attached as Exhibit 30.A.1. B. If significant historical or archaeological sites exist on -site, indicate what measures would be taken to protect them, or to minimize or mitigate impacts to them. Where appropriate, describe measures for providing public access to the sites. Response: All five archaeological sites identified within Hacienda Lakes are located in the area designated Preserve (please reference Maps D2 and H2). No additional protection or JC mitigation of impacts to the sites is required. Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support\Hearings \Q30 \Question 30 Historical and Arch.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q30 Pg.1 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF S "PATE Dawn K. Roberts Interim Secretary of State DIVISION 01; 11151'ORIC AL, RLSt)UR('ES Ms. Laura Lavi la it South Florida Water Maiiagemcnt District 2301 McGregor Boulevard Fort Myers, Florida 33901 Re: DI-IR No.: 20 1 0 - 03 6213/Received by DHR: January 27, 2010 Additional material received by DI-IR: June 8, 2010 Application No.: 100126 -5 Applicant: David Torres Project: I- lacienda Lakes Collier County Dear Ms. Layinaw June 9, 2010 Our office requested confirmation that refereuccd lrrojcct will avoid five archaeological sites (8CR556, 8CR878 -880, and 8CR8'81). In response, Cheryl Rolph of Passarclla & Associates, Inc., has provided a conservatiom areas map which demonstrates that these sites will rcnlaill �,vithin conservation areas for the currently proposed protect phaSC. This fllllill.S our regllCSt and concludes our review of this applicatiotl; no historic properties are likely to be adversely affected in the coiliplction of this pi-oicct. We arc grateful to Passurclla aril Associtcs, lltc., for their assistance in this. For any questions concernill; our commeills, please contact Stacey Callan, Historic Sites Specialist, by phone at 850.245.6333, or by electronic mail at dscahan «rdos.statc.il us. We appreciate your continued interest in protecting Florida", historic pr'czI)Cl ies. Sincerely, Laura A. Kammerer Historic Prescrvadonist Supervisor Compliance Review Section Bureav of Historic Preservation Pc: Emilio Robatr, RWA, Inc. Cheryl Rolph, Passarella & Associates, Inc. 500 S. Bronough Street . Tallahassee, FL 32399 -02550 • htip : //hc,siti.illrca-itage.coitt © Director's Office (7 Archaeological Research CI historic Preservation 850.245.6300 • FAX: 245.6.136 550.245,(A44 • FAX: 24,5.6.152 550.245.6333 • FAX: 215.6.137 QPART VI. SPECIFIC DRI INFORMATION QUESTION 32 — ATTRACTIONS AND RECREATION FACILITIES State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) GOAL (24); POLICY (1) A. What is the projected high, low and average daily attendance at the facility? Specify the season if applicable. Complete Figures 32.1 — 32.3. Response: The projected high daily attendance is approximately 9,000 people and the projected low daily attendance is approximately 5,000 people during the Swamp Buggy events for the month of January, March and October. B. Estimate the number of customers utilizing transportation other than automobile to reach the region and the site. Specify the transportation system and facilities to be utilized, their location, present and planned capacities. Response: It is anticipated that the vast majority of attendees of the Swamp Buggy event will arrive in personal vehicles. However, there is a possibility that some attendees will utilize chartered busses or the Collier Area Transit System. QC. If any transportation systems and facilities are to be owned, operated, or managed by the applicant, specify how these interface with other systems and facilities in the region. Response: Not applicable. Figure 32.1 100% x x x 90% x x x 80% x x x 70% x x x 60% x x x 50% x x x 40% x x x 30% x x x 20% x x x 10% x x x 0 -5% x x x x x x x x x x x x J F M A M J J A S O N D Complete for all project phases Q:\2005 \050150.02.03 Hacienda Lakes MPUD- DRI -ERP \0003 DRI - ADA \Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Suppor1\Hearings \Q32 \Question 32 Attractions and Rec Facilities.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q32 Pg.1 Figure 32.2 100% x x 90% x 9,000 x 80% x 8,000 x 70% x x x x 60% x x x x 50% x 6,000 x 40% x x x 30% x x x x x x x 20% x 4,000 x x x 10% x x x x 0 -5% x x x x x x x 2,000 S M T W T F Is * Complete for all project phases ** Plot separate curves for both peak and off -peak season. Figure 32.3 Number (Indicate Scale) 9,000 x 8,000 x x 7,000 x x 6,000 x x x 5,000 x x x x x 4,000 x x x x x 3,000 x x x x x x x 2,000 x x x x x x x x 1,000 x x x x x x x x 8 10 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 2 PM PM AM Q: 2005,050150.02.01 Hacienda Lakes MPUD - DRI- ERP,0003 DRI -ADA Subtask 3.2 DRI ADA Support Hearings Q32 Question 32 Attractions and Rec Facilities.doc 3/4/2011 ADA Q32 Pg.2