CCPC Agenda 08/18/2011 RCCPC
REGULAR
MEETING
AGENDA
AUGUST 18 , 2011
AGENDA
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., THURSDAY, AUGUST 18, 2011, IN
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY
GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA:
NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM.
INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP
ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF
SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR
GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT
SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC
HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY
THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A
MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED
IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE
RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A
RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY
NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE,
WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE
APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY
3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA
4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES July 21, 2011
6. BCC REPORT- RECAPS
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
8. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Note: This item has been continued by the petitioner from the August 4, 2011 meeting:
PUDA- PL2011 -703: Pine Ridge Center West PUD -- An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of
Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2001 -09, the Pine Ridge Center West Planned Unit
Development (PUD) by amending Section 3.3, Permitted Uses; and providing an effective date. The subject
property, consisting of 8.87 + /- acres, is located in Section 18, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier
County, Florida. [Coordinator: Kay Deselem, AICP, Principal Planner]
B. PDI- PL2011 -0462, Bucks Run PUD, A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating to
Petition Number PDI- PL2011 -0462 for insubstantial changes to the Bucks Run MPUD Master Plan for the
purpose of allowing interconnection with the Mission Church PUD for property located in Section 35,
Township 48 South, Range 26 East, near the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road in
Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner]
C. PDI- PL2011 -0794, Mission Church PUD, A Resolution of the Collier County Planning Commission relating
to Petition Number PDI- PL2011 -0794 for insubstantial changes to the Mission Church PUD Master Plan for the
purpose of allowing interconnection with the Bucks Run MPUD for property located in Section 35, Township
48 South, Range 26 East, near the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road in Collier
County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner]
D. CU- PL2011 -579, Garden Street, a Resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida
providing for the establishment of a Conditional Use to allow an iron and metal collection and transfer station
(refuse systems) within an industrial (I) zoning district pursuant to Subsection 2.03.04.A.1.c.16 of the Collier
County Land Development Code for property located in Section 36, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier
County, Florida. [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, RLA, Principal Planner]
10. OLD BUSINESS
11. NEW BUSINESS
12. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM
13. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA
14. ADJOURN
CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellows /jmp
AGENDA ITEM 9A
NOTE: THIS ITEM HAS BEEN CONTINUED FROM THE AUGUST 4,
2011 CCPC MEETING
PUDA- PL2011 -703, PINE RIDGE CENER WEST PUD
AGENDA ITEM 9 -13
Coder County
MEMORANDUM
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: AUGUST 18, 2011
SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PDI- PL2011 -0462, BUCKS RUN MPUD
(COMPANION ITEM TO: MISSION CHURCH PUD, PDI- PL2011 -0794)
AGENT /APPLICANT:
Agent: Michael R. Fernandez, AICP, RA
Planning Development Incorporated
5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2
Naples, Florida 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
Owner: Frank J. Dewane, Bishop
Diocese of Venice
c/o St. Agnes Parish
Allan Stencil, Business Manager
7775 Vanderbilt Beach Road
Naples, FL 34120
The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to approve an
insubstantial amendment to the Bucks Run MPUD Master Plan to include an additional
vehicular /pedestrian interconnection to the south.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The Bucks Run MPUD is located at the east side of Collier Boulevard (CR -951) near the intersection
with Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR -862) in Section 35, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, in Collier
County, Florida. (See location map on the following page.)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF MAP CHANGE:
The Bucks Run MPUD (Ordinance 2005 -39) was approved without a vehicular interconnection to
the adjacent property to the south. The applicant is now proposing to amend the PUD Master Plan to
provide an additional interconnection along the southern property line to Mission Church PUD. The
petitioner seeks an interconnection to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian travel between the two
facilities. The Master Plan (Attachment A) has been revised to depict the interconnections. The
location of the interconnection point has been approved by the Transportation Services Department.
Page 1 of 8
PDI- PL2011 -0462, BUCKS RUN MPUD
July 25, 2011
m
BEFD 6TA,IDN n3
RPUD PND tn i24 PUD
YANDFABRT c-.Y-
g
g
HERITAGE
BAT
WAIL
CREEK
TER-
NIRASDL
(DRQ
MPUD
�
17
16
15
14
13
18
LONGSHORC
DA WND
E CYPRESS
I��''�'IIy ESTATES IN
WRASOL
U2
ANE
SITE
U3
20
L.J
21
22 ?
HERITAGE
23 (ORI)
BAY
24
OIDC CYPRESS
(DRI)
19
°i rriii:`;;riri:' i;:iz'>.ir`'
ADDIE'6
:::: §JDAS'ALo*-`:., -. -,* :*::.,::*: :, :::...............
......
L
C�lER
...
..: '.: ..'...
•.. ...
... .. .... .
... .......
NAPLESIMMOKALEE ROAD
C.R. 846
c
r{ RICHLAND
E
SUMMIT
LAKES
TUSCANY
29
28
26
HABITAT 25
27
RIGAS HERITAGE
GREENS
CRYSTAL
LAKE
WTJppg6;Si
30
MDI
LAKES
ES
BRITTANY BAT
APHtTMENTS
WARM SPRINGS
BRISTOL BUTTONWOOD
PINES PRESERVE
PALERMO
SUMMIT PLACE
ISLANDWALI(
IN NAPLES
36
(DPI)
VANDERBRT
_ o G
3a
32
33
CWN RT CWB
35
PROJECT 31
WOLF CREEK ows
LOCATION
MMLLSN
VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD
MI6510N CMlBRCH
PRCMM
CAROLINA
LLAGE
5
4
3
2
8
GOLDEN GATE
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
GARDEN CATS ESTATES
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
VINEYARDS
(DRI)
ESTATES
UNIT 95
UNIT 2
UNIT 3
UNIT 6
UNIT 7
GOLDEN DATE BOULEVARD
12
8
9
iD
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
COLDER GALE ESTATES
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
UNIT 4
UNIT S
VINEYARDS
(DRI)
GDWEN SAM
ESTATES
UNIT 1
I
UNIT 32
PINE RIDGE ROAD
WHITE BOULEVARD
IC.R. 8961
BBR�S
17
i6
15
Cq.DEN GAIE ESTATEDATE
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
UNIT 2)
13
ESTATES
UNR 26
14
CC;DER CAT,, EST AS
UT 34
SUNGATE
URIT 15
WIT 194
CENTER
GREEN BOULEVARD
m
BEFD 6TA,IDN n3
RPUD PND tn i24 PUD
YANDFABRT c-.Y-
LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP
PETITION #PDI -PL -2011 -462
g
g
E
MPUD
�
u
iN AVENUE NW
DA---- ,we,• `>
-A -1
A
U2
SITE
U3
RPUD
LOCATION
,�•�,
:'i> MPUD':i `. *..:.. iii:..... ii>;'>: =1:
°i rriii:`;;riri:' i;:iz'>.ir`'
:::: §JDAS'ALo*-`:., -. -,* :*::.,::*: :, :::...............
......
PUD.....
MBSCG HWS
...
..: '.: ..'...
•.. ...
... .. .... .
... .......
LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP
PETITION #PDI -PL -2011 -462
g
g
E
E
u
iN AVENUE NW
lTx A�ExuE Nw
U2
U3
LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP
PETITION #PDI -PL -2011 -462
D
rt
^rt
W
n
rt
E
I
LANOaAOC fua
SbI10E f171 7 LEAST TNs
GIST 1RACT
mrsmaN
(slv +lo
T%?11ER)
.- -_ ld mom'0'
— �!CCiSS "-- 'tyAY-
MIXED USE AREA
RORTHt5E5T TRACt
&W ACRES*
(Ft"Wwllid Owy)
MIXED USE AREA
SWNWEST TAACF
7.00 ACRESf
1 d 'A a1 1arc S 11UFM V-
RAN a stAT "#r[i�
OCmuptl W'L COY511a1[.T
4 16' WQ lSPM11.T P.M ON
CANAL *M ([AST sM 6 OK GINW
PAM
t!
W
1' Ill WY 1m Mna •/ � 1
Oo4 V n.xxT. ),IC,
xr urrt m�01
r fAlO.alrf =.-I Lr ]all a f+o >.n[Yv
n fTl,c .K.... s lw wT re r a ua Ioi ..e
ni Imo. I�auroa
IY strum trswoGj
b d Y[�r�r. .lf MI M Ml t 7A. K .a.i>afh' In' a.NY,T .JrY;
60' BUZ RIO NF =OF -wAY SECljQt�
AGSSS -HQAQ
Y!S
10' FAIFM 'M- M TS P-WnP b'•
"0ER1v'C0 O ft" STE
OEMDPW/T PIAH OT RAT fFNTEYf
LAr� R
) AXED USE AREA
EAST TAAGT
�f 2 4 ACRES*
(R
I
AamaxTIMAL tomm. YANtXI.T MATRY CAM
LAM&wC E fIUi4JyY- RYOON.iIA/S
Id PLFTTit'A' m 13' PUT"'11'•
M- of umr PUN OR RAT PV6"
itEStOVT 4 ARCA
FAKER ..,..tr.xr.►.w.
COWREM fENM
[nwJim m Bar" 1,=
f
Ur BUFTM't' ai lS
vAlVORM.T —1111 -10
S E DENU- UE NC
SHE DEitlOr Rt
P.A7f OR MAT REVICIT
Pw....• .n.r.. a
\
G IlI.i 11[ff►�Ar�M �tlfti
��OGJ
C>OIIflill'4 P1C ilIIW
IMT<TX N.i[
s...Y,rr.r.w.n.wla
./
>r U l.E wr nO,arY nxa Tr uarlvl
is Xx
totormsl.la.uC L,�rcc...0 «w.<c
ll•I T.. K lW.a.. M.. Y ./Q
to K..r 01Iw1Y
5c'
Mn HIGHT -CF -wAY
$EQI1QN
$j$fEj
PRIVAIx M
AQ'WAM.tI. StYORI
w xrrrws fa t. 11x11_ fPx w f ®s.T.n..
v.osrt r rw •c.u. Ierte twa
411
L.tOSI'AA(, MR91Y
OE�CHIEjj,Qb
(�ETFS AND BDL S)
a .ft vam •.Ol�mlaWeCPr M ml...�I a'N W
r..iEi .11 /,Pr,MAOYII w +myna a =w-
.- -_ ld mom'0'
— �!CCiSS "-- 'tyAY-
MIXED USE AREA
RORTHt5E5T TRACt
&W ACRES*
(Ft"Wwllid Owy)
MIXED USE AREA
SWNWEST TAACF
7.00 ACRESf
1 d 'A a1 1arc S 11UFM V-
RAN a stAT "#r[i�
OCmuptl W'L COY511a1[.T
4 16' WQ lSPM11.T P.M ON
CANAL *M ([AST sM 6 OK GINW
PAM
t!
W
1' Ill WY 1m Mna •/ � 1
Oo4 V n.xxT. ),IC,
xr urrt m�01
r fAlO.alrf =.-I Lr ]all a f+o >.n[Yv
n fTl,c .K.... s lw wT re r a ua Ioi ..e
ni Imo. I�auroa
IY strum trswoGj
b d Y[�r�r. .lf MI M Ml t 7A. K .a.i>afh' In' a.NY,T .JrY;
60' BUZ RIO NF =OF -wAY SECljQt�
AGSSS -HQAQ
Y!S
10' FAIFM 'M- M TS P-WnP b'•
"0ER1v'C0 O ft" STE
OEMDPW/T PIAH OT RAT fFNTEYf
LAr� R
) AXED USE AREA
EAST TAAGT
�f 2 4 ACRES*
(R
I
AamaxTIMAL tomm. YANtXI.T MATRY CAM
LAM&wC E fIUi4JyY- RYOON.iIA/S
Id PLFTTit'A' m 13' PUT"'11'•
M- of umr PUN OR RAT PV6"
itEStOVT 4 ARCA
FAKER ..,..tr.xr.►.w.
COWREM fENM
[nwJim m Bar" 1,=
f
Ur BUFTM't' ai lS
vAlVORM.T —1111 -10
S E DENU- UE NC
SHE DEitlOr Rt
P.A7f OR MAT REVICIT
INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT (CLOUDED REVISION)
CkDD GRAPHIC SYMBOL FOR INTERCONNECTIONS WITH ADJACENT PUD
TK c ..•s
.u�
w!6
- AOr/h7 n.oRtxr
- -• ` _ Ill.' t �,{It .�..pM�l. id
TYPK'u " CPI zLFIOt
]ttpUq,TLRAI I ry
."rP
RlTt71 TRE4114NT IL.INT
JRTfa /[1��IC ♦ SY iC
BUCKS fibw 1lPUO
£X1131 r 'A-
UPUD UASrER PLAN.
.,. I Rl.. r j ..l.ta Pear*
PLANNING_ DEVELOPMENT
INC. 239.263 -6934; 04/12/11
Pw....• .n.r.. a
-RUi'K lr FllUf OR PLAT
INSTIT1tIV1LL
140TES
��� ��I p'• 17.11
• °r`MtO, f+'�K. ! Cmusm.nv Wlrr:
,) K nsrlMrfaC. -=—. .10 >Q fs AL "wwm
T..I.w.•rw� IlY .ow rm
1 +4C I4M 1SRa�oil 1[AIV
..1 .On.B/..tr Pule ds.W Vft a"-k �
L ..... .• 744—
Tlr r rr II+.� w
PROPERTY
w xrrrws fa t. 11x11_ fPx w f ®s.T.n..
v.osrt r rw •c.u. Ierte twa
»w.,
N+••5w•.... • -?F_. amt
4 Q
u,r Lwa o.•l.vn.lx ced.. ^7v�n9 MwLWp ra /r
ISS 1.n r.wj .T W. •1i1. A•i•+rT
OE�CHIEjj,Qb
(�ETFS AND BDL S)
a .ft vam •.Ol�mlaWeCPr M ml...�I a'N W
r..iEi .11 /,Pr,MAOYII w +myna a =w-
• rw OP�sa..c 7E r1 .ar ylTS
•PT.•JiL r4-1 -1�l
AS RM" f/1 Or THE SOlR1OW1 7 T/A
�r Arnim w M o�rn rvr
•ni
OF THE SOfn"REST to OF SECION 15,
J) Ta.eplT1 rr l'f/UC w o.xP- .IRK:
7w.01K MO 0— loom
!t4 t+�4+ 1 WPr,I.,l s'td .1. .t d W.., n.{M
TOR167w 48 SOIRH. woox 20 FAST,
CMAJD1 Gwml Ftn lk (m um
rRJai
rw+�is hA�� a m . W M TAT m
•r.1. e.l. P..T.�I •r..,w .� ... LrT w..a
�r..�w�, 1.T] ..r • rrw.f .t.. w ti
.ee..s Mho PW .ee...
0O"�Pld b• _ rs wt
EKaT YFE WEST IM FikT TFIF]EOf,
MIlYl0llSt.Y COWEYEO fDll A 11050 NQ
m.tr t4i MRT 9I lff M[YnaWir o"',
w.r...I
ft &w. M W d 14 ln. ./ O . ifif - - -_
�{
_W-t4., du 1. lieu[ 5,6..., f.d.a
�M �!!'xw�,h r f�i�ll.,l..4au,bcwt 6K(ry -__-
fGwl
SS4u1 NfalT -Of_ ]L4T� -_ __
- -- _
urtfil rawl.li ma .C°i+.r.lT re a L
roaw fu.IE W[ f41f1YRT PUT .+r.ovR frurna
ORM 7a..1 am u w lw ygPl.l[ Ir.I... Palle
PHt .. Sdr Or"1.P"n.M Ran
Tie Kww t/i aF T11E 411Ri!'AW Ali
OP Tf1C SE7l,Ttw6T i/{ OF SEL'1UN
h r.1 rle+lwRr m.nrrT nl K O11q tin.lrr n X. ocaVLw +ye f+om.
olerw �+ r_ �M
n+�l �•rw r V/h...r lM wTpf.rwf{.1 .Rh
rw• •� f. ma.l
3/S.
'T�T@� .Q so". x-mu'E 74 Wr.
cal" CDUKW. F110" I
ll�. Mf.oi �f M fwNlrsr
�.o.ar w w.. a l..e. •u1n o tv x r
r"LO d W(fr srMria.
!tea per_
.ice r.s.l r.r. _�
•'..:—
ter_ �4
N1r fi .A4 Q. VRJUl EAU �fOi 1.�
® tw.. Tmr Yr ^� Ir
^w�
o1T.
OTTUTO xtr.
R1QVw IwYt.iG . Rfl.v
r a R
^ •�9w -+..
rr-
u. 1�R rfr -
INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT (CLOUDED REVISION)
CkDD GRAPHIC SYMBOL FOR INTERCONNECTIONS WITH ADJACENT PUD
TK c ..•s
.u�
w!6
- AOr/h7 n.oRtxr
- -• ` _ Ill.' t �,{It .�..pM�l. id
TYPK'u " CPI zLFIOt
]ttpUq,TLRAI I ry
."rP
RlTt71 TRE4114NT IL.INT
JRTfa /[1��IC ♦ SY iC
BUCKS fibw 1lPUO
£X1131 r 'A-
UPUD UASrER PLAN.
.,. I Rl.. r j ..l.ta Pear*
PLANNING_ DEVELOPMENT
INC. 239.263 -6934; 04/12/11
D
Al
n
CD
r*
D
LMIRS(.M^E t�uuto n+o
9�1?�iTAOE fOR T tEA5T TIE
Car :..... !l...<<"'�
wow ,.
rot rwr
un CAEL
gua
MY AM
m>n:,
h rua et rt.r a' w anK •a sw w at
KAtl, A nnar7%
V
11� SOIDT
UAOIOCK tlAS;
s' n®LEE a FN7 stmt/
7TO O.cAty, /w eluot.
.nwea er...A.x AK.a
U
w .m w+e OOexT
aY 71V6 1TK l0otnptL
MR MLA
to
Til'E h wtrl'Q
R.� tK OC71C
50'
M1D RI •HT -4F_ WAY
S -110N
ars
PRIZEt r� .A sift
Aa9CMTLRAL ZOHWO
LA1135CAM tANT_4MY
OUFTEN b'
'0N 1+tls N MIXED USE AREA
R o XED USE TRACT
��)
Calm) 6.00 ACRFSf
_ (ReoldcnUd Only)
MIXED USE AREA
tlim SOUTHWEST TRACT
( 7.00 ACRESk
/ 10' DUFFER 'A' ai 13. OU/TEA 'D••
1 'DE7ElaearD DOfalc YTE
DEVUXPMEKT PUN OR PLAT 11EW
DEK10f+ER e4L CptslRVCT
A ?If WE AVIiALT PATH ON
1HE OUTWO DERV otim Tr1E STVW
CANAL ROW (EAST WE OF T11E CA"j
NOTES
t) r>�ow�aao+a[.t Alb.nrT AIgAKr m ar Atl nuc17.
'S .�-: M.ii :iaAx Auaaa rvrra
JIY Fothc>r -MT AK rlvca.%iK K MA1lwL AW M.�.T
10 wo.[Ytol Yr.� � tau., ln.E wo rmoAl rO..rw
7rovA.00rra a Wur rR MAaa uoo.cAtrun,
2T ALL OI.lIT /71Rrle] R.4>A1C301 N COUArc7W 1011 %q
T110ttE t0,0 ff w 71T'r17,aC AAe A( c cm Q m R
apt AM OAKK K rrtlllD A OK 4LlRIT Iifl
tUMln{+AAZ
n Z rt II�LO,A�� zm D ax A Af avo.- M F{A��
AIA ArrII -4u rm"m
h M 1.►OOHOIDRe uAOE 4 rmT IF in mmmmiT stuL
l0,tR2i OM.R]S m ■"r M .QL T 441
AtROfD OlEllq SK IsW3lItMtT MAT APPWOL Mu=
q o mvr7aT ni nK mim W."
t AAio.A.o4
® vtnr. mvw. A.c.
r " Ou.A = Aum ----
MCC d ftm �,
7.%1N MO TE7IRRE
11S7T1:� IOwIXA RirrO
q was vAm orb, �i r�atv�ac v uc
Kvuco, v vs.nrrL A.Gt
0 a�iwt rr°�°Kie[ n wTim . st INiap
.>ro tttE,Nr rtA.t for csa rt.
cm"
ACRICULTURM- ZOtom
tAW5CAPE NURSERY
r r
i
...... lam %/1.
EAST TRACT
24.00 ACRESI
xra
L459W ctiormi PVD
M11TUDUNAL
LZMATnI Bun It-V FR{.'L..ppM.
r,..a N..• su= 2101%
0"M • 7.21 •nn 21Mx
T-W Irtv.Nx.
A IN✓aw 204M
7w Vq.wr.,.- LTI.vw 2LW%
lMr • ].11 .crw Fix%
• T.wl OPw sp. Xr2.on1 - 63.1!5%
T" $I- 74.06Aer imm%
"� �" �...• .+twilpti r0 M LT1 aA.
•.d.. Ih. L M .1Mr.� � "� r.aw w M
�M O.J. e.. Mtn
�• Pmm .f nr r N.1
El sma zam 6124 K om 701 AROOAIIl Mt%7fV OIfYt%L
fM(LrOIA W 904,- tlUY.it 471➢ - rACUrT.
7%0r�o 2CIIrq OU�cI K. ru (WO {rte tr UrK7A,. t.rR .w
A Wogs A,W A
= ? K [ ry4RY A 1� %21rw m
1./iT iO...LT K Utll ,r!f kl.:_. ep !a! H i
.MLT.
air ....
•��A�.rl IY
ti.F o.r. n rwl u-•a,
iD' [%A FER 'A' OR 13' 817Ff
MXTUI #n Mv*m SLTE
DEVELOP ENT' ALAN OR PLAT R
rmLtd Notm
.l'GC'..::6 :.ww .+w. rgwrwnmts d Salton 0.09.(71 of
160 Llr 0-11 rn.nt Coda -9-r9 r.t W and /a
r�57.talbn ( 9.77 r>a-) d tf. rL*a. Aai ,*
tst'K .4: tya/1fJ.y -.tll.. he la y"tta4M��KUrdr.knq and It» ¢w
K..
t0.1oaw r.l.nL "p- -t oM .tCl .1 dl W... rlaLt.
wa.rtr.nt0 and ffpht -u ycery P.A be. tx*A: ef.•...
K76F.d tD nra9Fiaa L du. W Local aW FF.OwW�
Ind Pla K SR Drnyiopn+a'rtw pnpornt{a «� �*4
Pro"" Pr.oe my..... a. 1xY}w. w b. wi+ .l .d .{tn
.d6tlwwf nNJ•. pint md.rfaw, a. aPP7koh7. 1. m..l
f.yWffd btrlsK r,TY.ri4..
ter
skim L"
JV W L wm
tY t0:L1 = PAUVZEJ AIAW,.T —Am
M. m ODOW rrm 5.3 (2 lF1'L7
60' MADE RIGHT --OF —WAY SECTION
AS�C€SS ROAD
ui
VAHUOMT OMNM CLUO
a]Ua6r1 ius
10' D1i M 'A' OR 15' BUFFER V-
•OETERAe Dl1RW0 SITE
DELII.OPUENT PLFH OR PLAT R£v1E1F
UIrO= .w Tm.ara«+yw.r
13. MRTER "D* NTH a' 111a1� .
CONcreTE FUNKE
"ICS EV ON DOM SAES)
IV BUFTEA 'A' TX1 13'
a FEN b'• vANOEPW&T CURITRY CLUB Cacoksw
KXIERWIC) STEDETrETDPNF]/r iLts
PLM OR PUT REVE11'
'r I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
(METES AND ACXINDS)
THE NO(MH 1/2 OF THE fOMWM 1/4
OF THE SotigrAEST 1/4 DF SE ._ 33,
TOWN9q+ M SOVT11, R410E 215 EAST,
COU" CVl11fIY, i7.DRSD4, 1,EZ MD
EXCEPT 771E ItF3T 100 FEET THUCOF,
PRFYIOusLY CDM'EYEV FOR A RW 00
MAL WO1tt -OF -WAY.
TIE WMH 1/2 OF THE WV AST 1/4
OF THE 5=1*r T 1/4 OF SWIM 33,
TT)WN51•ip 4E Sa11M, W11C1 25 EAST,
CCLLLEA COUTiY, ililRiil
...a R .,� Q. CYADt iQl+1QR 13K rOW3 . TU)
a1E , LL! KatW . r1Erm
ufaTR! N1i. I s ra K6 A
.1m Or,O.4 1U7001 .w.
oe mle talc �.�
LW
rncn.l
v,a>m
w� M KR.0
�• lL a Ai ASR
-� .kaaK Ulf
au
AVQK TURAL. LOHHC
COLLJM Cam Ty
WATER IRFATW -ANT pLANT
�CL11511�IC J X/'rI1C
A O.I.i IC�f
Y•i
BUCKS HUN uPr/B
EXH(EXT 'A'
YPLI6 WASTER PLAN
zt�m I KLrm Ww"n I w I
No further changes have been made to the PUD document text. This is a companion petition to the
Mission Church PUD (PDI- PL2011 -0794) that is also requesting an additional interconnection.
ANAT.VCTC-
Section 10.02.13. E. of the Land Development Code sets forth the criteria by which insubstantial
amendments to a PUD Master Plan are to be reviewed before they can be approved by the CCPC.
The criteria and a response to each criterion have been listed as follows:
a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)?
No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the Bucks Run MPUD.
b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land
use or height of buildings within the development?
No, there is no proposed change in the type of land use or increase in the total number of
dwelling units which might have the effect of increasing the intensity of the use of the land or
exceeding the maximum height of buildings within the development. It should be noted that
the Bucks Run MPUD document specifies the project density and the total number of
dwelling units that can be built. The document also provides the development standards that
regulate the height of the permitted structures and their setbacks. As a result, the request to
repeal the master plan that was approved with Ordinance 2005 -39 and replace it with the
proposed master plan will not change the requirements contained in the PUD document.
C. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space
areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously
designated as such, or five (5) acres in area?
No, this Master Plan amendment merely replaces the plan that was approved via Ordinance
2005 -39 and replaces it with a master plan depicting interconnections. It should be noted that
the PUD document requires that 25 percent of the naturally functioning vegetation to be
retained on site. This includes 9.77 acres of preserve located throughout the site. There is no
proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the
development in excess of five (5) percent or five (5) acres since the criteria in the PUD
document remains the same.
d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non - residential uses, to include
institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation
or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses?
No, the proposed amendment will not increase the size of institutional, commercial, industrial
and/or any other nonresidential uses. This amendment only adds two vehicular /pedestrian
interconnections to the PUD to the south, Mission Church PUD. There is no relocation of
nonresidential land uses as a result of this amendment.
Page 5 of 8
PDI- PL2011 -0462, BUCKS RUN MPUD
July 25, 2011
e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but
are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or
impacts on other public facilities?
There is no increase in trips generated by this project as a result of the proposed amendment.
The location of the interconnections have been approved by the Transportation Services
Department.
f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular
traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers?
No, as noted above, the proposed change will not create any additional site generated trips
based upon the ITE Trip Generation Manual.
g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or
otherwise increase stormwater discharge?
No, the Engineering Review Staff indicates that the proposed change should not result in a
requirement for increased stormwater retention.
h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would
be incompatible with an adjacent land use?
No, the proposed interconnection between the Bucks Run PUD and the Mission Church PUD
will interconnect two existing, similar, church land uses located in two different PUD's. In
addition, the buffer areas as required in the PUD document will remain the same for either
Master Plan. As a result, the proposed change will not bring about a relationship to an
abutting land use that would be incompatible with the adjacent land use.
i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment
to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other
elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the
density of intensity of the permitted land uses?
No, this modification is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth
Management Plan. The modification to the Master Plan does not increase the intensity of the
permitted land uses. In addition, the PUD documents specify the project density and the total
number of dwelling units that can be built along with the requirement for retained native
vegetation and open space. The PUD document also specifies the uses allowed and provides
development standards that regulate the height of the permitted structures. As a result, the
proposed amendment will not change the approved density and/or intensity authorized by the ^
PUD document or otherwise affect any element of the Growth Management Plan.
Page 6 of 8
PDI- PL2011 -0462, BUCKS RUN MPUD
July 25, 2011
j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional
Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such
change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec.
380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and
any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial
deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec. 2.7.3.5.4 or Sec.
2.7.3.5.6 of this Code.
The Bucks Run MPUD is not a DRI. The above analysis indicates that approval of the
amendment to the Master Plan supports a conclusion that the amendment is insubstantial.
k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment
to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial
modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.?
Based upon the above referenced analysis, the proposed modifications are only to the Master
Plan. As a result, there are no changes that impact any consideration deemed to be
substantial.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for PDI- PL2011 -0462 on July 22, 2011.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) approve Petition PDI -
PL2011 -0462 representing an insubstantial revision to the Bucks Run MPUD by changing the current
Master Plan as shown in Attachment A -1 as compared to the proposed Master Plan shown as
Attachment A. (Please refer to pages 3 and 4 of this Staff Report for Master Plan exhibits.)
Page 7 of 8
PDI- PL2011 -0462, BUCKS RUN MPUD
July 25, 2011
PREPARED BY:
�1" 2AM��"
NANCY H, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
GROW GEMENT DIVISION
REVIEWED BY:
U.
RAY ND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
� a - -, &- -f� iii
AtLLIAM D. LO NZ, V, P.E., DIRECTOR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
APPROVED BY:
I ASALAN ,D TY STRATOR
GROWTH MANAGEMINNT DIVISION
Page 8 of 8
PDI- PL2011 -0462, BUCKS RUN MPUD
July 18, 2011
Wv t im
7 z- C) - //
DATE
0 7 - 7-Z. -2ol i
DATE
-�- z 7- //
DATE
PDI RESOLUTION NO. 11 —
A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER PDI -
PL2011 -0462 FOR INSUBSTANTIAL, CHANGES TO THE
BUCKS RUN MPUD MASTER PLAN FOR THE PURPOSE OF
ALLOWING INTERCONNECTION WITH THE MISSION
CHURCH PUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 35,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, NEAR THE
INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND
VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD IN COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such
business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 04 -41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission is authorized by the Board of
County Commissioners to grant insubstantial changes to PUD Master Plans in accordance with
Subsections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2.a.4 of the Land Development Code of Collier County;
and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly elected constituted
Planning Commission for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said
regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of PDI— PL2011 -0462,
insubstantial changes as shown on the revised Bucks Run MPUD Master Plan, Exhibit A, for the
Bucks Run MPUD, Ordinance Number 05 -39, for the property hereinafter described, and has
found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning
all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsections
10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2.a.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Commission in public meeting assembled and the Commission having considered all matters
presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
The petition filed by Michael R. Fernandez of Planning Development Incorporated,
representing Frank J. Dewane, Bishop, Diocese of Venice, be and the same is hereby approved for
Bucks Run MPUD / PDI- PL2011 -0462
Revised 6/23/11 1 of 2
making the noted minor design changes to the Bucks Run MPUD Master Plan having the effect of
revising the Plan to allow interconnection with the St. Agnes Church (Mission Church PUD) on
the revised Master Plan attached hereto as Exhibit A.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number PDT -
PL2011 -0462 be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and filed with the County Clerk's
Office.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this day of , 2011.
ATTEST: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator Mark P. Strain, Chairman
Growth Management/Planning & Regulation
Division
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
Steven T. Williams 5P aAa
Assistant County Attorney 01
Attachments: Exhibit A — MPUD Master Plan
Exhibit B — Legal Description
11 -CPS- 01097 \9
Bucks Run MPUD / PDI- PL2011 -0462
Revised 6/23/11 2 of 2
„.1I-r-rn- V a
f' IR GMM 1! YMi✓
/
- •••:•y •:••:••
j M �� _
fl{OI MO 1®[R
I
f' Iq..a1.. 1CB 11L11.
Ry.Ayy
MN1 J1' 1K OC,Q
.OwfM/¢. �M rut r .wRR
i Y 1[..,Q re.t
WK
owC” 1 MO !RR V Yw��.ol KATY r K
Nll 1J1 All pOAfr 1Cl .IN.. N {aG[q!, Md . •R.<L.
• aAl Xa. O.Y <rR «1 rw �:�
w <T+y.r
� �. 1 f/r NMI lAwrL
mE ta. n vnt q wyn MyA yi+w ..,..r ..c <.•t .s
5V MOE
r.« wT M1'..ya yor fm «
RIGHT- Or- WAY _SFCnaN
/
PRIyATLLQ__�! ',�TFif �T
A • AWLIILPA.N. i+nllc
AQE41lRA.AI i0flN
uwsl' -tlE �usEwY
IAtOP'.A➢C fnncixY
id 1AWTIM 'A- M 11 A1F.Ti. '8'•
Id MfAJI 1.• 9FfkA OWK SYi
otv.i -Kw pi1m CN RAr www
<eCFSS ROAOtAY
vi+rA
-emu.
NQ
4 w �= AtMpM Mn — v Ati +Rttt
WQ Yr<,.R9A.
Loa R
I.Alm USE AREA
°MIL AWA
NO5 T TRACT
^
6.W .00 ACRESk
{�y.y.1• `N � feOK
(R -W-t a only)
rI r•!
( LAIXED USE AREA
MIXED USE AREA
7.00 ACRES*
EAST TRACT
2{(R W—W
i 7 WY)
fAUB1 r IAIAi4 <uc j r solSt+t Ao He k,RW
111 IRS y4 bt11Y rA >YYM.W /J. �t%K
J f¢ RNfi 10t laitie4
I�11 K�.6 OOIIi'AlY1ML �C �yr�r� A 1
60' MME RICNT # -WAY SECTION
ACQESS f30AJ2
VANDUIt.LT OULWT Y CUM
cv�
td POM 'A• M fS PXFM -0"
•pCYET< PiIM YI€
p NU.1 EHr " M RAY !!'HER
IV Wm •v* 111TH d fK V ••,•:-
to W A WNW"e�MUOIA Iu/o
5m onu,�T
PLAN OR FLAT PEN"
MPUD INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT (CLOUDED REVISION) (PLANNfNG DEVELOPMENT
ADD GRAP'-iIC SYMBOL FOR INTERCONNECTIONS WITH ADJACENT PUD I NC. 239.233 -3934; 041 12/11 j
/
- •••:•y •:••:••
� �:'•' :'•'•':
A UOE A.�1{KT PAM�ON
i. nE s'•.y0 `
TMF LVRM
+annum."+
"n�xn.
o 9VTCle 'A'vl is
GAUL tkl/ (FAST sOE ar 1/E GMAT)
7 SIM
"--
'tit�ni7ten
llcjv� wRa w1Q
pl pplt}Ir RLAa ai KAT WN" IrS
(pT
tMC A.«:.a
/
Ot
r+s7lnUtloM.t
nw M•.• cel aw n�
• P4+4R. .krb.c
vi+rA
NQ
4 w �= AtMpM Mn — v Ati +Rttt
WQ Yr<,.R9A.
r+. .—
R. rny.d a%A nw.i Y., nwl...1M f $. Vw JJoef.ar a
PROPERTY OESCT irnoN
nM
��
R1Mdf M.R.\ Mme. IPny
{�y.y.1• `N � feOK
W
br Lvb D.Yr.pnwM Oo4. {yr�<..E •ytd..i.d /yr
iu (I," IH.
(JdFT1:S AND 6ON05j
Av
rw - 1i..
w"•ic::�.a
11�1l.l.a w ...n. <t rya. wAO.wa
�..� • 1, .e., tAy<
•
.o-«1 .t
••wM1f., n+- .IS....rA.w•s wA rrtr.t«r rN M wsrd
oA+f M . ow14Ae:r
aary•y . nR.
THE .T! 1%1 OF YE MmI�ES* 1/+
,,yy r•
A
t«<Cr i rvl lMwlWf. M IWIWO[ o fitll tP
to re aYUn ro.
'ri.
w
I,wr•lMn.
LF THE sm"uFST 1/+ OP SWIM M 35,
TorKsa P. 46 smK 1M" n WIT.
l�
v rnrr
�•..° ,r�"i ...i®
try .:k yal+ew. ueeos
COW". f At
•u
a u+awrt. InRDq w rllc +. !r!- nac
L .AGnU eI.M! v x RAt A
�'•' �yy
..wmir t t. ++a..,g .aw< wFt+. o�<'•c .m..
T- d'wl'r v. wno.pMwl F <N
fvml woo' rl-
PKIM t Y ot#T wO FORr TMW A
HIEMP)AY WM.E5T9 MR A 11Mp AMO
,
��ylyA�.pw'r�yF•M'•"f
y.wy .+ I.
n:b A. Yla Ap�.a1 wr rt M
F.A
wb{.d 1. nwi( fin dab lucd 51vb. ri (drd
fAIYIL I6f.M- Of-WY.
AGTPATAAE. iW.G
9 MA w'A.000f ryae u nut v ll0 l,9CnIM f.Ml
F.�.N
•.1:, w ..ul r M wr a s r Ef.i
gwgx Pjd r AM Mr✓aR+1r+f� v.Or'.flon �
tK M 1/2 m 7w Soun4pm t/<
R1A11 TW-An"T NJNT
a1A.er ....n ar.w mwn tA'e os•Lawr1 cone
mON.tfe 1a aiM M Y4L Dpplyf.r A N 0[i
�^'<
AAf Ltb W 1V. 1/OMIY I.Oinl. e'nl p...:r.v YuMS M
/
— _-...-
1eAe s%.orlw RAr y.11AOe Aay�
.r.wo.a ■ AwC li1Rl Ra. e..e ..wn.,
A.rr rrq- .«.. <. yr nlP1<+wbd .Ri
.y111.�r ,..fMy .Iri n..rK, w yA1AwMe i. f*y!i
Y01RSiR 16- SOUT1tf W-WE is FAST,
LRlJ6l COIMYT. !'IAl.af•
/B171�[
/L�IV t
.) <n nt..y.nAr! �..e� .te rK mW OII.IIY lArf11� s11r! wnn w Ar w A1 Iwu .w
.AS11 �1.s.on .iAr -- - -- - - -- -- ---- • a.rw .1. w a�'i vy�.har�il K farry.or.
rr.c, r wy. Auyor N• *< w
'<!kb wnr u<..fy. -
- __.. - -- -
I�..,'e,!<Wj
.4yCV�,�1���
{imlp
q�,
a.ws n e.n
���..
BIlC1GT RUX 1(PVI7
..aw w <,.q
GA Ap.TOel • lulim
E10#fl/ 'A'
r.ww Yi �
w.:y n..n
lelw MS {.
�.r w ,✓, ne
y.1. n..�..a,
uPUO YASITR PLAN
rw<.sr�.:
fmix
rrra
_
..,
<rr
w�....
�
.:w . • ,Rr
'f?Y�_ .'?a l�'dr^Y
r.v. sef
.vicar w.su wa1M 1
MPUD INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT (CLOUDED REVISION) (PLANNfNG DEVELOPMENT
ADD GRAP'-iIC SYMBOL FOR INTERCONNECTIONS WITH ADJACENT PUD I NC. 239.233 -3934; 041 12/11 j
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPT THE WEST 100 FEET THEREOF, PREVIOUSLY
CONVEYED FOR A ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT -OF -WAY.
THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER.
OF S1;CTION 35, TOWNSHIP 48 SOU"I'H, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
Exhibit B
AGENDA ITEM 9 -C
CoiLier County
WOOT I _I E_. _-1
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: AUGUST 18, 2011
SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PDI- PL2011 -0794, MISSION CHURCH PUD
(COMPANION ITEM TO: BUCKS RUN MPUD, PDI- PL2011 -0462)
AGENT /APPLICANT:
Agent: Michael R. Fernandez, AICP, RA
Planning Development Incorporated
5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2
Naples, Florida 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
The petitioner requests that the Collier County
insubstantial amendment to the Mission Church
vehicular /pedestrian interconnection to the south.
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
Owner: Frank J. Dewane, Bishop
Diocese of Venice
c/o St. Agnes Parish
Allan Stencil, Business Manager
7775 Vanderbilt Beach Road
Naples, FL 34120
Planning Commission (CCPC) to approve an
PUD Master Plan to include an additional
The Mission Church PUD is located at the north east intersection of Collier Boulevard (CR -951) and
Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR -862) in Section 35, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, in Collier
County, Florida. (See location map on the following page.)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF MAP CHANGE:
The Mission Church PUD (Ordinance 2000 -50) was approved without a vehicular interconnection to
the adjacent property to the north. The applicant is now proposing to amend the PUD Master Plan to
provide an additional interconnection along the morthern property line to Bucks Run MPUD. The
petitioner seeks an interconnection to facilitate vehicular and pedestrian travel between the two
facilities. The Master Plan (Attachment A) has been revised to depict the interconnections. The
location of the interconnection point has been approved by the Transportation Services Department.
PDI- PL2011 -0794, MISSION CHURCH PUD
July 25, 2011
Page 1 of 8
I -
MPUD
aaro nenR1 ps
swot lye
1 w.w
RPUD
PAUEB.
PUD
-� YANBERBKT CGMITM cure
i;
J
cV �� R1'BIRAEVMOrr ri�nr t
MPUD
soxaMA aMa A
RPUD
cu wKSaoo xnre w.
roG MPUD SITE
BUCKG RLN
LOCATION
PUD ww
i. :: !.1::.:.:i::i:: .'i:: ';i ;:;>:;(: �>:: :i:PUD''ri:;:;:;: ?:!ai:; is ;i;'::i::ii:: iii:; i:;':: : ? :...................
roar vumr :::. '.:..:' ... .... .. :::..::: ::. .::... :'..... .�::. ::::•:• ..:: 4
�
g
v
HENRAGE
BAY
QEEIIL(
TERAEWA
MIRASOL
(WTQ
E
w
18
15
14
13
18
17
U2
DA VINO
U3
ESTATES IN
CYPRESS
LNOSMORE
LAKE
�OWE
NIRASOL
20
21
22
Ivo
HERITAGE
23 (0m)
BAY
24
OLDE C19REBS
19
(�I)
CORK.
CO(RHER
ocn�mR
NAPLES4MMONALEE ROAD
C.R. B4B
SUMMIT
G1 RIGILAIA
LAKES
NSDANY
m
CAVE
29
28
27
qg
HABITAT 25
30
RIGS HERITAGE
ORDERS
CRYSTAL
AKE
MCGOREST
MDIGO
LAKES
BRITTANY BAY
WARM SPRINGS
APARTMENTS
PINESL BUTTGNNCDD
PRESERVE
PALERMO
SUMMIT PLACE
ISLA(DRI) (
COVE
IN NAPLES
38
(DRI)
VANDERBILT
COUNTRY CLUB
32
33
34
35
31
YVDLE CREEK
BDIIBODP
PROJECT
MN
BUW(S RUN
LOCATION
VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD
'GC
CMOUNA
VILLAGE
5
3
2
1
6
GOLD N GATE
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
GOLDEN ITATE ESTATES
OLDEN GATE ESTAIEB
WLON GATE ESTATES
VINEYARDS
(DRI)
ESTATES
UNIT 98
UNIT 2
UNIT 3
rc
UNIT B
UNIT 7
t4
GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD
d
11
12
7
B
9
10
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
UNIT 4
GOLDN GATE ESTATES
UNIT 5
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
UNIT B
VINEYARDS
(DRI)
GOLDEN GALE
ESTATES
UNIT 32
UNIT 1
PINE RIME ROAD
VAIITE BOULEVARD
P.A. BBq
_ _OUgG�E
_.
17
>�
i6
15
COLCN GATE ESTATES
OWEN GATE
�
WIDEN GATE ESTATES
UNIT 27
13
18
ESTATES
UNIT 25
14
WLON GATE ESTATES
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
UNIT 34
PFkL
SUNOAIE
CEN ER
UMT 15
UNIT 104
GREEN BOULEVARD
I -
MPUD
aaro nenR1 ps
swot lye
1 w.w
RPUD
PAUEB.
PUD
-� YANBERBKT CGMITM cure
i;
J
cV �� R1'BIRAEVMOrr ri�nr t
MPUD
soxaMA aMa A
RPUD
cu wKSaoo xnre w.
roG MPUD SITE
BUCKG RLN
LOCATION
PUD ww
i. :: !.1::.:.:i::i:: .'i:: ';i ;:;>:;(: �>:: :i:PUD''ri:;:;:;: ?:!ai:; is ;i;'::i::ii:: iii:; i:;':: : ? :...................
roar vumr :::. '.:..:' ... .... .. :::..::: ::. .::... :'..... .�::. ::::•:• ..:: 4
LOCATION MAP
PETITION # PDI -PL -2011 -794
ZONING MAP
1
�
g
v
Q
5
4
E
E
w
)M AY➢!UF NR
>iX AKM1F NW
U2
U3
LOCATION MAP
PETITION # PDI -PL -2011 -794
ZONING MAP
1
=LAKE
romp
CS
Q: 0--
J F'--H N
L-Lj
CL
ul
COUNTY ROAD 951
---------------------
, !2
1E Qw
O
WIN,
7 1
Vi
KBER BOULEVARD
PUD EXHIBIT "B",
Attachment A
11
A hil
�J
CC)
:j:
CL
'RESER
LAKE
--i
0
O
COUNTY ROAD 957
PUS EXHIBI T "B py
Attachment Al
� it I'd
A
No further changes have been made to the PUD document text. This is a companion petition to the
Bucks Run MPUD (PDI- PL2011 -0462) that is also requesting an additional interconnection.
ANAT.VCTC-
Section 10.02.13. E. of the Land Development Code sets forth the criteria by which insubstantial
amendments to a PUD Master Plan are to be reviewed before they can be approved by the CCPC.
The criteria and a response to each criterion have been listed as follows:
a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)?
No, there is no proposed change in the boundary of the Mission Church PUD.
b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land
use or height of buildings within the development?
No, there is no proposed change in the type of land use or increase in the total number of
dwelling units which might have the effect of increasing the intensity of the use of the land or
exceeding the maximum height of buildings within the development. It should be noted. that
the Mission Church PUD document specifies the project density and intensity. The document
also provides the development standards that regulate the height of the permitted structures
and their setbacks. As a result, the request to repeal the master plan that was approved with
Ordinance 2000 -50 and replace it with the proposed master plan will not change the
requirements contained in the PUD document.
C. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space
areas within the development in excess of rive (5) percent of the total acreage previously
designated as such, or rive (5) acres in area?
No, this Master Plan amendment merely replaces the plan that was approved via Ordinance
2000 -50 and replaces it with a master plan depicting interconnections. It should be noted that
the PUD document requires that 15 percent of the naturally functioning vegetation to be
retained on site. This includes 5.33 acres of preserve located throughout the site. There is no
proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the
development in excess of five (5) percent or five (5) acres since the criteria in the PUD
document remains the same.
d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non - residential uses, to include
institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation
or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses?
No, the proposed amendment will not increase the size of institutional, commercial, industrial
and/or any other nonresidential uses. This amendment only adds two vehicular /pedestrian
interconnections to the PUD to the north, Bucks Run MPUD. There is no relocation of
nonresidential land uses as a result of this amendment.
PDI- PL2011 -0794, MISSION CHURCH PUD
July 25, 2011
Page 5 of 8
1001\
e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but
are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or
impacts on other public facilities?
There is no increase in trips generated by this project as a result of the proposed amendment.
The location of the interconnections have been approved by the Transportation Services
Department.
f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular
traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of
Transportation Engineers?
No, as noted above, the proposed change will not create any additional site generated trips
based upon the ITE Trip Generation Manual.
g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or
otherwise increase stormwater discharge?
No, the Engineering Review Staff indicates that the proposed change should not result in a
requirement for increased stormwater retention.
h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would
be incompatible with an adjacent land use?
No, the proposed interconnection between the Mission Church PUD and the Bucks Run PUD
will interconnect two existing, similar, church land uses located in two different PUD's. In
addition, the buffer areas as required in the PUD document will remain the same for either
Master Plan. As a result, the proposed change will not bring about a relationship to an
abutting land use that would be incompatible with the adjacent land use.
i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment
to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other
elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the
density of intensity of the permitted land uses?
No, this modification is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth
Management Plan. The modification to the Master Plan does not increase the intensity of the
permitted land uses. In addition, the PUD documents specify the project density and the total
number of dwelling units that can be built along with the requirement for retained native
vegetation and open space. The PUD document also specifies the uses allowed and provides
development standards that regulate the height of the permitted structures. As a result, the
Page 6 of 8
PDI- PL2011 -0794, MISSION CHURCH PUD
July 25, 2011
proposed amendment will not change the approved density and/or intensity authorized by the
PUD document or otherwise affect any element of the Growth Management Plan.
j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional
Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such
change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec.
380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and
any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial
deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec. 2.7.3.5.4 or Sec.
2.7.3.5.6 of this Code.
The Mission Church PUD is not a DRI. The above analysis indicates that approval of the
amendment to the Master Plan supports a conclusion that the amendment is insubstantial.
k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment
to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial
modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.?
Based upon the above referenced analysis, the proposed modifications are only to the Master
Plan. As a result, there are no changes that impact any consideration deemed to be
substantial.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for PDI- PL2011 -0794 on July 22, 2011
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) approve Petition PDI -
PL2011 -0794 representing an insubstantial revision to the Mission Church PUD by changing the
current Master Plan as shown in Attachment A -1 as compared to the proposed Master Plan shown as
Attachment A. (Please refer to pages 3 and 4 of this Staff Report for Master Plan exhibits.)
Page 7 of 8
PDI- PL2011 -0794, MISSION CHURCH PUD
July 25, 2011
PREPARED BY:
6wo
REVIEWED BY:
RAYN40ND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
VvL'-X�-LL
LIAM D. L NZ, r., P.E., DIRECTOR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
APPROVED BY:
NICK,tA'SALA,0dUI6A, DtP MINISTRATOR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ISION
Page 8 of 8
PDI- PL2011 -0794, MISSION CHURCH PUD
July 20, 2011
-7-2a -if
DATE
07-zZ -Z /l
DATE
-2 -zL -1l
DATE
PDI RESOLUTION NO. 11—
A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER PDI -
PL2011 -0794 FOR INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGES TO THE
MISSION CHURCH PUD MASTER PLAN FOR THE PURPOSE
OF ALLOWING INTERCONNECTION WITH THE BUCKS
RUN MPUD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 35,
TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, NEAR THE
INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND
VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD IN COLLIER COUNTY,
FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such
business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code
(Ordinance No. 04 -41, as amended) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular
geographic divisions of the County; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission is authorized by the Board of
County Commissioners to grant insubstantial changes to PUD Master Plans in accordance with
Subsections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2.a.4 of the Land Development Code of Collier County;
and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the duly elected constituted
Planning Commission for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said
regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of PDI— PL2011 -0794,
insubstantial changes as shown on the revised Mission Church PUD Master Plan, Exhibit B, for
the Mission Church PUD, Ordinance Number 00 -50, for the property hereinafter described, and
has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made
concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Subsections
10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2.a.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this
Commission in public meeting assembled and the Commission having considered all matters
presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING
COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that:
The petition filed by Michael R. Fernandez of Planning Development Incorporated,
representing Frank J. Dewane, Bishop, Diocese of Venice, be and the same is hereby approved for
Mission Church PUD / PDI- PL2011 -0794
Rev. 6/24/11 1 oft
making the noted minor design changes to the Mission Church PUD Master Plan having the effect
of revising the Plan to allow interconnection with the Bucks Run MPUD on the revised Master
Plan attached hereto as Exhibit B.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number PDI-
PL2011 -0794 be recorded in the minutes of this Commission and filed with the County Clerk's
Office.
This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote.
Done this day of
ATTEST:
Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator
Growth Management/PIanning & Regulation
Division
Approved as to form
and legal sufficiency:
Steven T. Williams
Assistant County Attorney 1
Attachment: Exhibit A — Legal Description
Exhibit B — PUD Master Plan
11 -CPS- 01098 \12
Mission Church PUD / PDI- PL2011 -0794
Rev. 6/24/11 2 of
2011,
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
Mark P. Strain, Chairman
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THE SOUTH %z OF THE SOUTH/ 20F THE SOUTHWEST '' /a OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP
48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PROPERTY ID NUMBER
Collier County Folio No.:
Exhibit A
00205880009
1
y
V
n
O
z
y
0
D
� 1
PUD MA S TER PLAN EXHIBI T
\
PIRCFJ\TAC[OP PAAI'KL
4/!2/1. added Interconnect cad ZOI'.ING: BUCKS RJV MPJJ (MIXED VSE FV\N51_., JNII D- 1YELOPIAW)
- 1
rn� * ++�'�M a•.���
wrwwx edraJr
dW 1.fV.-u1 HE[TPCAYI[TFG
-
•
. `:', r? ?:•: is �:-:• ? :i:L G:
..:............. ... ...... ..... : :....................... ..................
_...
�'� PARKING
f
1
�- mpg
CHURCH I SCHOOL
lleSG
ATI1 .
I'D0. SITLD[ \'ELOYAIL�T PI.A. \(CDPI APPLICATIO V.
NTPI.A1 (SDr)
S.w,n,nw
ltl
Hauny.nae,er
Par.iM 1 "rLwaMn 5.11
1415E
TpD Wd.,aper e.:t
10!A
TYYCAC 35.%
111DV�n
•
. • —
��
1. ?Wrvlm Mrrmarg er Ulm SPau, Jnq MP.ad�
56330 F[[1 Ap41[dl Xr ViIA' IMFSSJ-rOZI1 L?JFID6
G76
A
om
la(AO/ e01 -Clnl r(I
1nlr � i rlJ r A'IX J, � n
r
AA
Q
fECB'ND AND NCTFB:
. • =RASS / ECR85S
LAND USE TABLE
IA'DISI' A>'1'0.0�IAIATr Af]C ut
PIRCFJ\TAC[OP PAAI'KL
1. AAII.\IATI4).NTI5P[AI'IFTAIN ti S1TE'RJY.Sa.I(' FTf[CiSTKa
1'LCLTAFIV, \SIU I.L PP.0.1:T�1N{L.l C10CAT10.[VF TII9,D0.r1 [R \'[
rn� * ++�'�M a•.���
dW 1.fV.-u1 HE[TPCAYI[TFG
kw,im hnAoPed arts) lIYJ
RN ENTS- D T
RIk1l0NlI[N]SA:TD[ \'El.ap \t ITTPROG0.AIIT P0.0 \'IV[A THAT 1lIF
1.0.rYJ5l'aer
aP ISM"CtAAL\pA0 \'10LDIS5JJAaF Le.AT1 MTfLOCHMETROp
poLSOI\'E4 L'L I.LAC L(1t^A TI(L SI: ■C1[TTAL
C1aVar„srl Ana J.Z^
lleSG
ATI1 .
I'D0. SITLD[ \'ELOYAIL�T PI.A. \(CDPI APPLICATIO V.
NTPI.A1 (SDr)
S.w,n,nw
ltl
Hauny.nae,er
Par.iM 1 "rLwaMn 5.11
1415E
TpD Wd.,aper e.:t
10!A
TYYCAC 35.%
111DV�n
LAND USE NOTES:
1. ?Wrvlm Mrrmarg er Ulm SPau, Jnq MP.ad�
IV.AY Aerc.
dx
I
1 ��
a _
w
p
`a fi' �
PLANNING DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED "' F MISSION CHURCH +rsr �` PUD MASTER PLAM �^^ ARF °e0d x eot� mrapp rm. ^«
DepeioFpmeat CDmuitmte. Architects, F.aQtn «re. MtG/AQ FERNANCEZ geSJ /
Y4aa.T: h I.Aadaoaps AlchiGcle O.k. a. A S a.,aun" EXHi8lr 8 pro}ct mmodr.� nM.AnJ: 1
5133 CASMLL0 DRM,, SUITE P• NAPL96, FLORIDA 34[03 dr., t: F-.k J Deweoe _ �,yp y ° p
(239) 263 -6934 miem—d- Opl- 1.14e -J pa nU...com 9I ®F w a¢ mxas or Vm" D4.1Z. 11 JMF ` 1 : Irn oJ.1a77
31A[C w ti A,K'ffiIAtTrIRt AAIdlmraa / ncnr[tamfc: u AaeJ[d /u contact: rm rumlm�.r Aoau wAna 21 JIrv/Jet Ipaat✓a.: C17 UER COUNTY, FLORIDA - '— °r PUD REZONE i76R61 )•
fAYiS
AGENDA ITEM 9 -D
Cotl'ier County
STAFF REPORT
TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
HEARING DATE: AUGUST 18, 2011
SUBJECT: CU- PL2011 -0579, GARDEN STREET RECYCLING
PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT:
Property Owner: Agent:
Naples Lumber & Supply, Co., Inc. Mr. Michael R. Fernandez, AICP, RA
3828 Radio Road Planning Development Incorporated
Naples, FL 34104 5133 Castello Drive, Suite 2
Naples, FL 34103
REQUESTED ACTION:
To have the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application for a
Conditional Use for an iron and metal collection and transfer station (refuse systems) within an
Industrial (I) zoning district as provided for in Subsection 2.03.04.A.1.c.16 of the Collier County
Land Development Code (LDC).
GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:
The subject 4.18± acre site is located at 4246 Exchange Avenue, on the south side of Exchange
Avenue approximately 300' east of Industrial Boulevard and Exchange Avenue intersection, in
Section 36, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See the location map
on the following page.)
PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
The purpose of this petition is to obtain a Conditional Use approval to allow a scrap iron and
metal collection and waste transfer station ((refuse systems (SIC 4953)) which is located in the
Industrial (I) zoning district. The subject 4.18± acre site was previously developed and is the
former location of the Naples Lumber Truss facility. The applicant proposes to relocate the
�` Garden Street Iron and Metal Collection, Inc., facility (an iron and metal collection and transfer
station under existing Conditional Use 93 -215) located at 6101 Shirley Street to 4246 Exchange
CU- PL2011 -0579 GARDEN STREET RECYCLING Page 1 of 9
7 -18 -11
LOCATION MAP
i
DOMESTIC AVENUE
PINE RIDGE RD
(C.R. 686)
§
RPi i
SV
ASTRON
PLAZA
PINE RIDGE
MIXED USE
MOORINGS
�,
FOREST
MEADOWBROON CROUP
a.5
WE
GOLD KEY
CENTER
EST
LAKES
HOMES
6RYNMOOD
PRESERVE
N
H
WHIPPOOFINIL
(S)
14 NAPLES
t3 HIWASSE
FNC
19 LAKES
76
1S
MOORINGS
B.—C.
KENSINGTON
PARK
CCENNN��r
CEN1<R
ARUNCTO
NAPLES B
�P WILL
PINES
GOLDEN GATE ESTATES
UNIT 33
PMK
n
TIIA6ER DD
CHURCH
¢
g
ENTERPRISE AVENUE
MRLD EVANS
F C
O R T
ENTERPRI
co
TENNIS
CENTER
BAIMORAL
WHIPPOORWILL
WOODS
BLDG A
HAWS RIDGE
UNNGSTON VILLAGE
CONGO
TRACT A
g
�
EXCHANGE AVENUE
KITCHEN
& g
I
EXCHANGE AVENUE
KONCEPT
21 -
22
3;; 24 " o '
19 In
20
TRACT W
p3
� y
6
GOLOEN GATE ESTATES m l
»:::RAIT..B''<?
BAILEY WILSON
SITE
WYNDEMERE ¢
UNIT 31
LPNE CENTER
8.. s
O
GREY OAKS
-EXCHANGE
—:-%.I-AND ::::::::..
LOCATION
_
(DRI)
TRUST'.
F
GREY OAKS
JA�1'C�S
COLWADES AT
pU
(DPI)
CLUBHWSf
SANTA BARBARA
COCA COLA PARK WEST
2]
2B
Il 25 3D
29
-
20 I9
29
(C.R. 866)
GOLDEN GALE ESTATES
GOLDEN CATS ESTATES
GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY
UNIT 30
CORPORATE SQUARE NORTH
13
UNIT 7a
23
JS J6 3]
GREY OAKS
(DRI)
13
20
BERKSHIRE
fi
LAKE$
(ow)
Se
RBRIA
to
— DD
O
COLVER CWNtt
oEYELDPMENT
3, PROJECT
33
SER NCES CENTER
3B
LOCATION 32
27 28 38
34
p
35
PROGENY
BERKSHIRE LAKES
COMMERCE LANE
CENTER PARK
(DPo)
77''
PU®
NAPIEG
RADIO
RADIO
RPDIO ROAD (C.R. 85G)
]
AIRPORT
LIEBIC
SA%ON
MANOR
a
M.R,%AE,,.
WESTNfW
PLAZA
S
COMMERCE
REF[NCY
BERKSHIRE
LAKES
CENTER
AUTGIAUS
BRETONNE (DPI)
4
3
SUMMERNVW
PARK
(OR,) S
2 E
AIRPORT 1
FO %FIRE
VAT N
PLAZA SPRINGWOODE
E
g
O
BROOKSIDE ARMY
"NK
(S.R M)
DAVI6
BOULEVARD g
g
U
XEL-
�.TR
LOCH
k
SFAK
CITY
RIDGE
_
NA ES
PON AC
VONTER PARK
n
g
¢
10
1
GALLMAN
ESTATE
12
MNGS LAKE
(DRI)
;,U S9
7
777
MILLER
COWER COUNTY
aa
tKA
N
SQUARE
GOVT. COMPLEX
WEST
Foj
(DRI)
CFI-
PYRITE
(P
COLL
F
PUD VERNADO
1
�
ct
CRICKEVERDE
O
WINDSTAR
LAKE
\>A\
FINERY
t6
15
T4 "q
1B COLfY
ROYAL WOODS
LANE
'ESTATES
G &C CLUB
A"t, CHURCH W1NDSONG
LOCATION MAP
i
ZONING MAP
PETITION #CU -PL -2011 -579
DOMESTIC AVENUE
DOMESTI AV'
6fi
d �
GOLD KEY
1
/
1
6)
I
'ARM 368
1.53
2
n
ENTERPRISE AVENUE
¢
g
ENTERPRISE AVENUE
ENTERPRI
co
o
BLDG A
W
CONGO
TRACT A
�
EXCHANGE AVENUE
KITCHEN
I
EXCHANGE AVENUE
KONCEPT
TRACT W
»:::RAIT..B''<?
SITE
-EXCHANGE
—:-%.I-AND ::::::::..
LOCATION
TRACT 9
TRUST'.
ME RO
pU
TRACT 'C"
COCA COLA PARK WEST
PROSPECT AVENUE��
R2 21
-
20 I9
cowl))
Is i7 18 15 14
CORPORATE SQUARE NORTH
13
23
JS J6 3]
3B 40
13
20
fi
Se
33
to
O
25
p
STOW AWAY
Q
27 28 38
30 J2
MIN S70RAGE
77''
PU®
O m
28
]
PROGENY
a
d
COMMERCE
CENTER
2 3
a < y 6
AROAD
�
O
a
of
C,
O
U
ZONING MAP
PETITION #CU -PL -2011 -579
�o��i� / %�iii��ii �iii�iiiii�ii��''�;��� ✓�� '%c�s!_fz�1/>;!��/�%i -s ��as/�i_� ✓� ,�lJ�
,.
cr •
/ II
isM el
y� ✓, ; �i���������������i�i�i�i�i �►IiMlMA,Wl
r
��/ �j�ii���i `i- ��� /�' /����� /�� ✓rf>,� � � /�./� �% I J' Vii` �:� % r . %r' r" � %� f% �
-.: . .• : . - . • -.• r
• • I Ito] - 1 W-Al m o
ii
i :III
a
location where it is further processed. According to note number 7 on the Conditional Use
Master Plan, there will be no shredding of metal at this site, as it is prohibited at the petitioner's
request.
There are two existing mostly open sided buildings (one has a small area enclosed with walls)
totaling approximately 47,652 square feet on the subject site. According to information
submitted by the applicant, processing of materials will occur under the buildings and outside
stockpiling will be limited to 8 feet. The site is buffered by existing 10 -foot wide Type D right -
of -way landscape buffer which consists of a 3 -foot high hedge and trees 30 feet on center along
Exchange Avenue. The remainder of the property boundaries are buffered by an existing 10 -foot
wide Type A landscape buffer which consists of trees located 30 feet on center.
Consistent with LDC Subsection 4.02.12 "Design Standards for Outside Storage" the stock piles
and recycling operations will be screened by a proposed 7 -foot high screen consisting of a hedge,
wall or opaque fencing along the perimeter of the "northern" half of the site as shown on the
Master Plan. A proposed 8 -foot concrete wall along the perimeter of the "southern" portion of
the site will screen the stockpiles and recycling operations as shown on the Master Plan. (See
Site Plan on previous page and Aerial on the next page).
There is also parking and paved storage areas. The LDC requires 60 parking spaces. However,
the applicant intends to apply for a parking waiver in order to provide fewer parking spaces.
Vehicular access is provided by two ingress /egress points onto Exchange Avenue.
According to the applicant, the hours of operation for the facility are currently from 7:30 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 7:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Saturday. The applicant would
like to extend these hours as needed. There will be site lighting for security purposes.
The site presently has water service provided by the City of Naples and sewer service provided
by Collier County.
The proposed Exchange Avenue facility will operate in a similar fashion as the existing facility
on Shirley Street. Scrap metal such as soda cans, copper tubing, old aluminum pool cage
framing, and rebar from building renovations and reconstruction will be collected. During a site
visit to the Shirley Street facility, staff observed the crushing of aluminum cans and their
collection on a conveyor belt into a semi trailer. There were also dumpsters containing metals
such as sorted copper wiring and a pile of pool cage framing. According to information provided
by the applicant, while the uses will be similar to the Shirley Street site, there will be a few
additional items collected at the proposed Exchange Avenue site which will include intake of
appliances and vehicles. The recycling of scrap metals which includes collecting, sorting and
transporting will be the primary land use at the Exchange Avenue site.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING:
SUBJECT PARCEL: The site is currently developed, in the Industrial (I) zoning district
SURROUNDING:
CU- PL2011 -0579 GARDEN STREET RECYCLING Page 4 of 9
7 -18 -11
North: Exchange Avenue, then developed land in the Industrial (I) zoning
district
East: developed land in the Industrial (I) zoning district
South: developed land in the Industrial (I) zoning district
West: developed land in the Industrial (I) zoning district
Aerial
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY:
Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The property is currently zoned "I" Industrial (or Lutz
Industrial/Tract B Subdivision) and is designated Industrial on the Future Land Use Element,
Future Land Use Map (FLUM). Uses allowed in the "I" zoning district are allowed in the
Industrial designation of the FLUM.
CU- PL2011 -0579 GARDEN STREET RECYCLING Page 5 of 9
7 -18 -11
s�
Based on the above analysis, staff finds the above request consistent with the Future Land Use
Element, Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan.
ANALYSIS:
Before any Conditional Use recommendation can be offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals
(BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) must make findings that: 1) approval
of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect
other property of uses in the same district of the neighborhood; and 2) all specific requirements
for the individual Conditional Use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made
concerning the following matters, where applicable:
1. Subsection 2.03.04 A.l.c.16., of the LDC permits Conditional Uses in the Industrial (I)
zoning district.
The requested uses for a scrap iron and metal collection and waste transfer site for resource
recovery (SIC 4953) are permitted as conditional uses in the Industrial (I) zoning district,
subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00, Conditional Uses
Procedures, of the LDC.
2. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management
Plan (GMP).
This request is consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and this project will be
in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code (LDC).
3. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular
reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control,
and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition and has found no transportation
related issues. As shown on the Master Concept Plan on page three, adequate vehicular
access to the site would be afforded from two existing access points along Exchange Avenue.
4. The affect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to
noise, glare, economic or odor effects.
The subject site is currently surrounded by other industrial uses, such construction
contractors and subcontractors to the north, a hurricane shutter company and an electrical
wholesale company to the south, and a roofing supply company and an equipment rental
company to the west.
As previously stated in this Staff Report, the existing buildings are mostly open sided
buildings. In addition to the existing landscaping buffers, the applicant proposes the
following to minimize impacts to the neighbors (please refer to the site plan on page 3 of this
Staff Report):
CU- PL2011 -0579 GARDEN STREET RECYCLING Page 6 of 9
7 -18 -11
- install a building fagade along the front street facade of the existing building;
- install a 7 -foot height hedge, wall or opaque fencing to further enclose the northern area of
the site, continuing approximately halfway down the east and west property lines;
- install an 8 -foot high wall is proposed along the remainder of the east south and west
property lines.
5. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district.
As noted above, the proposed scrap metal recycling use would be surrounded by other
industrial uses including a roofmg supply company and a rental company to the west, (which
is a use permitted by right only in the Industrial zoning district) as well as building
contracting and subcontracting businesses to the north and south. Due to this industrial
location, the provision of the required enhanced perimeter buffers previously described, and
the conditions of approval recommended by staff, the impacts from this project on the
neighboring properties would be minimized and compatibility enhanced.
Based on the above findings, this conditional use is recommended for approval.
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIIM):
The applicant duly noticed and held the required meeting on June 29, 2011, at 5:30 p.m. at the
Naples Airport. Six people along with the applicant and County Staff attended the meeting. For
further information, see Attachment A: NIM Minutes.
The meeting ended at approximately 6:00 p.m.
COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW:
The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for CU- PL2011 -0579 revised on July
21, 2011.
RECOMMENDATION•
Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition CU-
PL2011 -0579 to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation of approval subject
to the following conditions:
1. Outside storage of materials is limited to the screened areas of the site. The materials shall
not be stored or placed in such a way that the resulting height is in excess of the height of
the site's outdoor storage screen/ concrete wall.
2. The proposed building fagade along the street frontage of the existing building shall be a
minimum of height of 8 feet.
3. On -site shredding of metals is prohibited.
CU- PL2011 -0579 GARDEN STREET RECYCLING Page 7 of 8
7 -21 -11
PREPARED BY:
NANCY G L e,�MENT P, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
GROWTH DIVISION
REVIEWED BY:
Z7�� el- /-i� �`
RA ND V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER
GRO TH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
ZL'�k_�Pj
LIAM D. LO j NZ, r., P.E., -DIRECTOR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
APPROVED BY:
C CASAL G A, UTY ADMINISTRATOR
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Attachments:
Attachment A: Previous Resolutions
Attachment B: NIM Minutes
Attachment C: Resolution
�lu.f 15
DATE
-7 -1g -1►
DATE
® T Z7- zal
DATE
-�_ U -I/
DATE
Tentatively scheduled for the September 13, 2011, Board of County Commissioners Meeting
CU- PL2011 -0579 GARDEN STREET RECYCLING Page 8 of 8
7 -15 -11
MAY 25, 1993
RESOLUTION 93- 215
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
REFUSE SYSTEMS (METALS RECYCLING) CONDITIONAL USE
IN THE "I" INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 2.2.16.3.14 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION
11, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER
COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the state of Florida in Chapter
67 -1246, Lava of Florida, and Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has
conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and
enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for
the protection of the public; and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land
Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which includes a
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the
zoning of particular geographic divisions of the. County, among
which is the granting of Conditional Uses; and
WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission, being the
duly appointed and constituted planning board for the area hereby
affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said
regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability
of Conditional Use 2.2.16.3.14 in an "I" zone for refuse systems
(metals recycling) on the property hereinafter described, and has
found as a matter of fact (Exhibit "A ") that satisfactory provision
and arrangement has been made concerning all applicable matters
required by said regulations and in accordance with subsection
2.7.4.4 of the Land Development Code for the Collier County
Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to
be heard by this Board in a public meeting assembled and the Board
having considered all matters presented.
soon 000 PAGE 61
-1-
Attachment A
f
• MAY 25, 1993
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
of Collier County, Florida that:
The petition filed by Robert P. Henderson of Simpson,
Henderson, Savage i Carta, representing Earl Weber, Sr., with
respect to the property hereinafter described as:
Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and incorporated by
reference herein
be and the same is hereby approved for Conditional Use 2.2.16.3.14
of the "I" zoning district for refuse systems (metals recycling) in
accordance with the Conceptual Master Plan (Exhibit "C ") and
subject to the following conditions:
1) Outside storage or stockpiling of metals awaiting
processing /recycling is prohibited.
2) Outside storage of bailed /recycled metals is limited to
the rear yard and shall not be stored or placed in such a
way that the resulting height is in excess of 8 -feet
above the site's existing grade.
3) The petitioner shall install opaque decorator slatting
along that portion of the existing fence located adjacent
to and along the rear of the existing building.
4) The applicant shall provide Project Plan Review with an
on -site utility plan and water management plan at the
time of SDP submittal.
5) This site lies entirely within Wellfield Protection Zone
WS -3. The petitioner shall comply with the applicable
provisions of the Groundwater Protection ordinance-No.
91 -103.
6) The master plan shows two proposed 24 -foot wide entrance
driveways.. These driveways shall be reconfigured to show
one -way in and one -way out. The maximum width shall be
15 feet. If a 24 foot driveway is desired, there shall
only be a single dual driveway permitted.
7) Metals processing /recycling shall be conducted within the
existing building. The petitioner shall comply with
Collier County's Noise Ordinance No. 90 -17.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the
minutes of this Board.
600c 000 t4t 62
-2-
10i
• MAY 25, 1993
FZNDZNG OF FACT
BY
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
FOR
A CONDITIONAL USE PETITION
FOR
CO-93 -5
The following facts are found:
1. Section 2.2.16.3.14 of the Land Devlopment _
Code authorized the co tonal use.
2. Granting the conditional use will not adversely affect
the public interest and will not adversely affect other
property or uses in the same district or neighborhood
because of:
A. Consistency with a Land.Development Code and
Growth Manageme Plan:
Yes No
B. Ingress and egress to property and proposed
.structures thereon with particular reference to
automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience,
traffic flow and control, and access in case of
fire or catastrophe:
Adequate ingress egress.
Yes• No
C. Affects neighboring properties in relation to
nois , glare, economic or odor effects:
No affect or Affect mitigated by
Affect cannot be mitigated
D. Compatibility with adjacent properties and
other property in the district:
Compatible upe within district
Yes No
Based on the above findings, this conditional use should,
with stipulations, (copy attac ed) (should not) be
recommended for approval
DATE: 7 /J CfSAZ$ZSB
FINDING OF FACT CHAIRMAN /md
Exhibit "A"
600K GI 0 PR;f 64
MAY 25, 1993
gavay SIREEt
BOOK OOOFA-A 66'"
Garden Street CU
Conditional Use Petition
CU -PL 2011 -0579
Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM)
5:30 p.m. / June 29, 2011
Attendees:
Collier County:
Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner, Zoning and Land Development Review
Property Owner Agent Representatives:
Michael R. Fernandez, AICP, RA, President, Planning Development Incorporated
Terri Fernandez, Vice - President, Planning Development Incorporated
Attendance: Approximately 10 individuals; only one land owner represented (adjacent and to the west); and one tenant
(adjacent and to the east); balance of attendees were related to the petitioner
This Neighborhood Information Meeting began at 5:30 p.m. and ended at approximately 6:00 p.m. Nancy Gundlach
opened the meeting by introducing herself as the representative from Collier County and Principal Planner of the
petition(s). She introduced Michael Fernandez as the Agent for the property owner / petitioner.
Michael started by explaining that this was a Conditional Use petition for an existing developed property on
Exchange Avenue, which was formerly, for 10 years, the Naples Lumber Truss Plant. He noted that the zoning
itself, Industrial, does not change through this process, and that a Conditional Use is being requested to add a
permitted use to the zoning, in order to allow Garden Street Iron & Metal to relocate their recycling collection and
transfer station to this property. He mentioned that Garden Street has been in business in Collier County on Shirley
Street within an Industrial Park off Pine Ridge Road since 1993 under the provisions of a Conditional Use, without
incident, and that they have been good neighbors.
He explained that this N1M meeting is required by the Conditional Use application process and that property owners
within 500' of the property were notified by mail, approximately 68 letters were sent.
It was announced that the public hearing before the Collier County Planning Commission is scheduled for Thursday,
August 18, 2011, and that the tentative scheduled date for the petition to be heard by the Board of County
Commissioners is in October 2011.
Michael reviewed the Conditional Use plan and emphasized the conditions /commitments of the Conditional Use
application that have been detailed or referenced on the Conditional Use Master Plan. There were no new
commitments made during the meeting.
The guests were invited to view the proposed conditional use CU plans and aerials and applicable submittal and
support documents, and to ask any questions they may have, and then the formal presentation was concluded by Mr.
Fernandez, and he opened the floor for questions and comments.
There followed a number of questions about the ultimate proposed use of the property by Garden Street as a
recycling collection and transfer station; including: will the public be dropping off materials, possibility of debris
affecting adjacent properties, type of containers /trailers /trucks /scales to be used, will there be a loading dock and/or
platform, hours of operation, sale or lease of the property — long term/length of business use, cameras and security,
and number of anticipated employees.
Page 1 of 2
3560 Kraft Road, Suite 301, Naples, Florida 34105 mfernandez (a�,planningdeveloomentinc.com • Phone 239.263.6934
Development Consulting and Planning Architecture Engineering Landscape Architecture
State of Florida Corporate Certification of Authorization No's: AA26002158 CA No. 8450 License No. LC0000378
Attachment B
The owners of Garden Street also shared brochures of their overall operations including the processing facility in Ft.
Myers and assured those attending that the Exchange Avenue facility is solely for collection and to serve as a feeder
transfer station to the primary facility in Ft.Myers.
Garden Street is a family owned business and the owners (Rob and Linda Weber) were in attendance and were able
to offer assurances that they have agreed to the conditions that have been set forth with Collier County for the
Conditional Use. They mentioned that they have chosen this larger property for relocation of their existing Collier
County business in order to be located closer to their customer base, and have better access to I -75. This site also
offers relief from the more congested Pine Ridge Road. They intend to run the business safely and cleanly, and to
keep the property secure, just as they do at their current facility on Shirley Street and other locations in Fort Myers
and Cape Coral.
One nearby property owner was unsure that the proposed use was going to be compatible with the area; that she
would prefer the site to be redeveloped as more of an upscale office type building; she and her son own a nearby
building at 4305 Exchange Avenue. But after learning that the business was Garden Street, about their business
operations, and the conditions of the Conditional Use approval, she was satisfied that this would be an improvement
to the area. During the discussions, it was learned that the attendees have for many years and continue to do
business directly with Garden Street.
As were all the other attendees. They expressed support for the project and see it as an enhancement.
The meeting was then closed. End of Meeting Notes
Document Date: June 30, 2011 / Document Prepared By: Planning Development Incorporated
Page 2 of 2
3560 Kraft Road, Suite 301, Naples, Florida 34105 mfemandez@planninizdevelopmentinc.com • Phone 239.263.6934
Development Consulting and Planning Architecture Engineering Landscape Architecture
State of Florida Corporate Certification of Authorization No's: AA26002158 CA No. 8450 License No. LC0000378
RESOLUTION NO. 11-
A RESOLUTION OF T14E BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW AN
IRON AND METAL COLLECTION AND TRANSFER STATION
(REFUSE SYSTEMS] WITHIN AN INDUSTRIAL (1) ZONING
DISTRICT PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 2.03.04.A.I.c.16 OF THE
COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH,
RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 67 -1246, Laws of Florida, and
Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on Collier County the power to establish, coordinate and
enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public, and
WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No.
2004 -41, as amended) which includes a Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance establishing regulations for the
zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of Conditional
Uses, and
WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals (Board), being the duly appointed and constituted
Planning board for the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations
made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a Conditional Use of an iron and metal
collection and transfer station (classified pursuant to SIC Code 4953 — Refuse Systems) within an
Industrial (1) Zoning District pursuant to Subsection 2.03.04.A.I.c.16 of the Collier County Land
Development Code on the property hereinafter described, and the Collier County Planning Commission
has made findings that the granting of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest
and the specific requirements governing the Conditional Use have been met and that satisfactory
provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations
and in accordance with Subsection I0.08.00.D. of the Land Development Code; and
WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in a
public meeting assembled and the Board having considered all matters presented.
Attachment C
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that:
Petition Number CU- PL20I1 -579 filed by Michael Fernandez, representing Naples Lumber
& Supply Co., Inc., with respect to the property hereinafter described in Exhibit "A ", be and the same is
hereby approved far a Conditional Use for an iron and metal collection and transfer station (classified
pursuant to SIC Code 4953 — Refuse Sy stems) within an Industrial (1) Zoning District pursuant to
Subsection 2.03.04A.1.c.16 of the Collier County Land Development Code, in accordance with the
Conceptual Site Plan described in Exhibit "B" and subject to the conditions found in Exhibit "C".
Exhibits "A". "B ", and "C" are attached herdo and incorporated herein by reference.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutcs of this
This Resolution adopted after motion, second, and super - majority vote, this day of
2411.
ATTEST:
Dwight E. mock, Clerk
By:
Deputy clerk
Approved as to forth
and legal sufficiency:
ELI-
Steven T. W-d iam
Assistant County Attorney
Exhibits attached: A. Legal Description
B. Conceptual Site Plan
C. Conditions
K
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
By:
FRED w. COYLE, Chaimtan
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TRACT `B ", LUTZ INDUSTRIAL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND SUBJECT
TO THE PLAT RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 25, PAGES 20 AND 21, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SECTION 36,
TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PROPERTY ID NUMBER
Collier County Folio No.: 56310000100
CONDITIONAL USE MASTER PLAN
NORTH
GENERAL CONDIAONAL USE MASTER PLAN NDTES:
..NA GE TO BE DETERMINED AT SDPA PERM -N. AND SHALL R
CONSISTENT W31H APPLICABLE LX RESTRICTIONS
H B
1. STORY WATER MA. -EYEW PERMITTED THROUGH S -D
8g, c
E
8P$
GENERAL PERMT x0. 11- 00414 -S; SSUEO JULY 41, 1598 .1
E %CHANGE LINO TRUST.
3. COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEWL ENT CODE ARCHITECTURAL
G3
DESIGN STANDARDS ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
4. STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE E %ISTING AND NAY BE
I
1
AMENDED PRONGED THEY ARE CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE LDL
STANDARDS
MOUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT PERMITS OUTDOOR STORAGE WHEN
KEENED BY A SEVEN (77 FOOT HEDGE, WALL, OPAWE FENCE
R A CONBINAA S OF SCRfENIN6
000
WALLS 10 PRONOC
5. ENHANO STNUCTC'DO MAY RECEAT
ENHANCED PROTELAW INOL3 WEATHER.
ER.
I "yy
1 kS�
]. NO OHS TE SHREDdNG OF METALS PERMITTED.
RE,
L
yz3&
n
§2 !
o
Of
LANDSCAPED
AREA (HATCH) TYPICAL
EXISTING STRUCTUR
IMPROVED
"ARE BORDEN
8,00T,"O.M.AlL.
WITH ADDITION OF NEW
-1••'
FACADE •
O• STORAGE SCREEN (BOTH SIDES
ROOFED OPERATIONS.
OF HEDGE,
PARCEL ALONG PROPERTY
OR OPAQUE OR
COMBINATION OF THESE SCREENS. MINIMUM
HEIGHT OF SCREENING SHALL BE 7 FT
1 HEIGHT OF OUTDOOR STORAGE
NOT 1 THE HEIGHT OF THE
MAINTAINED SCREEN.
REV. In
CONDITIONAL USE MASTER PLAN
NORTH
I R
6:
AODP AREA 1),fi52 36]A ya
PAVBAffiM 105,3A sAPA IYl
TO
DPBIJ 9PAGB 3Y,]N Is.tlh $
roxAL 9TB IYLYG6 tarn � oil
LAN93C.APY If3PPN Ci
PBHIMLi881LAPD5CAPB 9,954 U
]DTAI I.ATlTS.`.APoICPeN 3R]14
1�0_DL4TION6 L
OPPICB ZTw@ V3A 9P- 091 SPACES
BR&U:k BB91'ROOM 1, 1533P® VZIS SP- 4.30 SPMT3
LB TION /YO XT RODPAABA) 9,0109Pg V5m 9P- IY.I SPACB6
35.95PACB9
(9P IS LB 59 OLTSmOWALLS I Ctl.iMN AREA)
TOTAL SPACES RFQIRRHt3 5919PACAB
P LB PIIONB3eD 3A0 (1 SPA �O
SHALLBB ABN3IT ®AT SDPARBl�OPJ SSS .3o'
59 iDIAL 9PA[HSPAOVDRp
L.ANOTIBRk RBQUIX®•PRONO ®LANMCAPR a1PPPlL P p3
9TB INDU9TRLAL YARD RBQLMPDSQTB_ Bth}'BRWDTxtr a
TYPE
N�1N WD[RIRW. &0.W P0.0M SG FT lo•TYPED V S ofL
SOUTH INUUSIRW. REAR I5PT IU'—A
BAST 1NDUSERW. SIDE OFECR HD'; w.
N'AIAE Wm NMR IPTYPRA 1yyy����j�j3
o"ORIon; O
west 1NDUSTAIAL 9[8 W RYg
lB4LOT Wm[HIAN 10'TYPHA C.ni.
WAT[RAEANAOW.ffiET Iy °•¢
ln,tlofi SaxwPr - u,3sov
T3IRH6rBAt"m
s1l:trtxnfiaxsoM -9,ven 9i
RBTtT 11@IP�VO)® - 11jls0 g1
MNLSUMIATAIIEA: bT.mD3P; III,tl059P AL•[UAL 9.y�
s33N001MTpPTR'mTR: lA>T vtl PT ACTUAL 9)f
6LAAMDMEDILDEN0NUGE11i 5oR X50 PI
c
b
M3 CW; DATA / DTPORNN'OW TARBN PROM D.k 341 ,B Y O IOOS3TPT3 SDPA 3D. 9&13L(AE POLO !
ICOIDI W; 4346 R%CBANOR AYBM`B, NAPI.LW, PW0D.4 111 W; ONLY NOMNAL RRN1910N9 ANDCD'ATBO N BB
REOIllPBDTOACWA•40DAlR OUNg11WALL9B'.
SND 1BR DRel4D5 TO SEEK CGYIMY ADMD4SIRAi[VB RBI.IEP LVN3tDEDLXT1ON OF A REDUCDON OF RBQU WhNT DO:
vast .— ON SP.- . VIY_. N®S: B)1. BA _ PARRRJO ARRAS _,B
GENERAL CONDIAONAL USE MASTER PLAN NDTES:
..NA GE TO BE DETERMINED AT SDPA PERM -N. AND SHALL R
CONSISTENT W31H APPLICABLE LX RESTRICTIONS
H B
1. STORY WATER MA. -EYEW PERMITTED THROUGH S -D
8g, c
E
8P$
GENERAL PERMT x0. 11- 00414 -S; SSUEO JULY 41, 1598 .1
E %CHANGE LINO TRUST.
3. COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEWL ENT CODE ARCHITECTURAL
G3
DESIGN STANDARDS ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
4. STRUCTURES AND IMPROVEMENTS ARE E %ISTING AND NAY BE
I
1
AMENDED PRONGED THEY ARE CONSISTENT WITH APPLICABLE LDL
STANDARDS
MOUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT PERMITS OUTDOOR STORAGE WHEN
KEENED BY A SEVEN (77 FOOT HEDGE, WALL, OPAWE FENCE
R A CONBINAA S OF SCRfENIN6
I
WALLS 10 PRONOC
5. ENHANO STNUCTC'DO MAY RECEAT
ENHANCED PROTELAW INOL3 WEATHER.
ER.
I "yy
1 kS�
]. NO OHS TE SHREDdNG OF METALS PERMITTED.
RE,
L
yz3&
n
§2 !
o
I R
6:
AODP AREA 1),fi52 36]A ya
PAVBAffiM 105,3A sAPA IYl
TO
DPBIJ 9PAGB 3Y,]N Is.tlh $
roxAL 9TB IYLYG6 tarn � oil
LAN93C.APY If3PPN Ci
PBHIMLi881LAPD5CAPB 9,954 U
]DTAI I.ATlTS.`.APoICPeN 3R]14
1�0_DL4TION6 L
OPPICB ZTw@ V3A 9P- 091 SPACES
BR&U:k BB91'ROOM 1, 1533P® VZIS SP- 4.30 SPMT3
LB TION /YO XT RODPAABA) 9,0109Pg V5m 9P- IY.I SPACB6
35.95PACB9
(9P IS LB 59 OLTSmOWALLS I Ctl.iMN AREA)
TOTAL SPACES RFQIRRHt3 5919PACAB
P LB PIIONB3eD 3A0 (1 SPA �O
SHALLBB ABN3IT ®AT SDPARBl�OPJ SSS .3o'
59 iDIAL 9PA[HSPAOVDRp
L.ANOTIBRk RBQUIX®•PRONO ®LANMCAPR a1PPPlL P p3
9TB INDU9TRLAL YARD RBQLMPDSQTB_ Bth}'BRWDTxtr a
TYPE
N�1N WD[RIRW. &0.W P0.0M SG FT lo•TYPED V S ofL
SOUTH INUUSIRW. REAR I5PT IU'—A
BAST 1NDUSERW. SIDE OFECR HD'; w.
N'AIAE Wm NMR IPTYPRA 1yyy����j�j3
o"ORIon; O
west 1NDUSTAIAL 9[8 W RYg
lB4LOT Wm[HIAN 10'TYPHA C.ni.
WAT[RAEANAOW.ffiET Iy °•¢
ln,tlofi SaxwPr - u,3sov
T3IRH6rBAt"m
s1l:trtxnfiaxsoM -9,ven 9i
RBTtT 11@IP�VO)® - 11jls0 g1
MNLSUMIATAIIEA: bT.mD3P; III,tl059P AL•[UAL 9.y�
s33N001MTpPTR'mTR: lA>T vtl PT ACTUAL 9)f
6LAAMDMEDILDEN0NUGE11i 5oR X50 PI
c
b
M3 CW; DATA / DTPORNN'OW TARBN PROM D.k 341 ,B Y O IOOS3TPT3 SDPA 3D. 9&13L(AE POLO !
ICOIDI W; 4346 R%CBANOR AYBM`B, NAPI.LW, PW0D.4 111 W; ONLY NOMNAL RRN1910N9 ANDCD'ATBO N BB
REOIllPBDTOACWA•40DAlR OUNg11WALL9B'.
SND 1BR DRel4D5 TO SEEK CGYIMY ADMD4SIRAi[VB RBI.IEP LVN3tDEDLXT1ON OF A REDUCDON OF RBQU WhNT DO:
vast .— ON SP.- . VIY_. N®S: B)1. BA _ PARRRJO ARRAS _,B
CONDITION FOR APPROVAL
FOR
CU- PL2011 -0579
1. Outside storage of materials is limited to the screened areas of the site. The materials shall not
be stored or placed in such a way that the resulting height is in excess of the height of the
site's outdoor storage screen/concrete wall.
2. The proposed building facade along the street frontage of the existing building shall be a
minimum of height of 8 feet.
3. On -site shredding of metals is prohibited.
EXHIBIT C