CEB Minutes 05/19/1989
1989
Code
Enforcement
Board
ay 19,1989
DATE:
TIME:
PLACE:
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
May 19, 1989
9:00 A.M.
3rd Floor Boardroom, Building "F", Collier County
Government Center, Naples, Florida
CEB STAFF PRESENT
ANDREWS X BARTOE X
CONNELLY X BOYCE X
CONSTANTINE X CLARK X
LAMOUREUX X CONTI X
PEDONE X LAUBACH X
STRAIN X MAZZONE X
WILLIAMS X MORAD X
NEAL X
PETTROW X
SMITH X
TOMASINO X
WILSON X
MINUTES BY: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk
9:00 A.M.
CALLED TO ORDER AT:
ADJOURNED: 12:30 P.M.
PRESIDING: Darlene Connelly, Chairman
ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA: None
Page 1
Development Services Department
Community Development Division I Collier County Government
2800 North Horseshoe Drive I Naples, FL 33942-6917
Phone: 813 I 643-8400
CODE ENFORCEMENT
~c.."'~,'4
:,~';,~""::
,'",,'d-,
, <'-.
.' ,;;";;"-' ,:.,~)o",,"'"
" '. ;" ..:~: "":'."'.."''''' .......
. ......'
- ~::;,~..:.~~: ~"..-,,~;;~,~.,
~.'F" '."~~_t~-'
BOARD OF COLLIER C~UNTY:' FLORIDA
,',
~'~~C.<j;~,..
",,:: . ., " ,-~.
. '. ~'i""'~ ....: "_''''OlIl'- ,'. ;.-:: .,,~
A Q E H 12A,~:~~;~)t'A;~,f~~~l~~.
· .~p'~~~,:.'~'~ ';,ii,;.:.
Date: May 19. 1989 ,,~:...at:'7 9.00 '0.0 ,c:tock.,A..:..M_"s\'+.x;:;:~::.:t;,~.,
. :':' ',:~~;;;';t?;,~;S~1.~'2:"- "i:tfF~4j,f~~f!L,~,,~:;:i~:~,1:~';F,:::, '
NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES ,TO APPEAL'~A DECISION"OF'; ":~:::'<
THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THEPROCEEDINGS:~~::~~-' ....',;,.,:..;
PERTAINING THERETO,. AND THEREFORE MAX:: NEED',.TO ENS~;:THAT.;~~~:,~~di~~:;.:
A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS;ISMADE'WHIGJl,$IRECO~~;~~t;.::
INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCEUPONWHICHTH~'.~P,l?EAlt':;:f::*0Ft,:
IS TO BE BASED. NEITHER COLLIER' COUNTY NOR:. THE .CODE"'< "}',: .
ENFORCEMENT BOARD SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING"THIS
RECORD.
1. ROLL CALL
2.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
N/A
4.
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT :
Heyward E _:.Boyce,. Manager
ComplianceSeryices
<j~'Pi",~~:it. "
5.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.
Compliance Services'VsMr. John
Evangelisto (CEBi#89-;,,001).
Compliance servic:.~s:,vs,Mr _ Donald
Geckler (CEB #89~00~r::..
Compliance Seryicesvs Mr. Humber-to,
Robert Ayala (CEB~#89~003)_ .~
Compliance Services.vs. Mr. Paul
Herskowitz (CEB !89~004).
N/A
B.
O~,~
D. .
6.
OLD BUSINESS
7. NEW BUSINESS
8. REPORTS: Richard R. Clark, Supervisor
Contractor Licensing
NEXT MEETING DATE
June 22,
ADJOURN
. '.''''
." ,'~i;~~(i):;~:~~+ .'
_~.. :~::.','~.'~-- ,:~:;;~':":T-'. '.'- >,
..t:'~~, ;::,!!;';,"~1<> -:' ,,_0 ", "'< -:~~, '.:
' ,";..",....."'--~. ... -. ~, - ',.
.' :;f~2'i'-' ....<. .. .. ..,::
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
COMMENTS:
ITEM:
COMMENTS:
MAY 19, 1989
***
Chairman Connelly stated that the Code Enforcement
Board was established pursuant to Chapter 162,
Florida Statutes, known as the "Local Government
Code Enforcement Boards Act", and by Collier County
Ordinance 88-89. She advised that this board is an
administrative board which has the authority to
impose fines and other non-criminal penalties. She
noted that the purpose of the board is to enforce
the Codes and Ordinances of Collier County so that
the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of
Collier County can be promoted, protected and
improved. She indicated that the members of the
Code Enforcement Board are all volunteers and per-
manent residents and electors of Collier County who
have been selected by the Board of County
Commissioners. She further stated that the members
have experienced an interest in the areas of
zoning, building control, engineering, and the
environment. She reported that membership includes
general and specialty contractors, an attorney, a
real estate agent, engineers, and businessmen from
throughout Collier County.
Mrs. Connelly introduced the members of the Board
and Assistant County Attorney Wilson. She advised
that the enforcement procedure to be followed is
set forth in Ordinance 88-89, and the rules and
regulations adopted by the Code Enforcement Board
are those of the Collier County Code Enforcement
Board.
Mrs. Connelly reported that the Board will meet on
the 4th Thursday of every month, and as necessary
to carry out their duties.
***
Introductory Statement by Heyward Boyce, Manager
compliance Services
Compliance Services Manager Boyce stated that many
of the cases that will appear before this Board
will originate within the Compliance Services Sec-
tion of the Development Services Department, speci-
fically within Dick Clark's Code Enforcement
organization. He advised that Mr. Clark is
assisted in Code Enforcement by George Dahir, the
Page 2
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
code compliance investigators, and Bill Smith,
Ex-Officio/Secretary to the Board.
Mr. Boyce reported that there are 10 full-time code
compliance investigators, one of which specializes
in the Minimum Housing Code. He noted that each of
the investigators operate from the Development
Services Building, and they are assigned to a given
geographic area within the County. He indicated
that the exception to this, is the rotating weekend
patrol or an occasional 24-hour stake out. He
stated that typical daily duties include managing
complaints that are called in by the public,
generating or observing cases while on patrol,
doing the necessary recheck work to determine
whether or not a violation has been corrected,
documenting cases that may be brought before this
Board, and a considerable amount of time is spent
in the Courthouse determining land and property
ownership. He advised that 30%-40% of the cases
involve illegal land use, weeds, trash, overgrown
lots, illegally parked and stored vehicles, and
illegal signs throughout the County.
Mr. Boyce stated that in reviewing cases for April,
which was not a typical month since there was a
shortage of personnel, there were approximately 400
called in public complaints, 600 complaints were
generated on a patrol basis, and 900 rechecks. He
advised that from the 1,900 observations, 700
violations were corrected. He indicated that
annual observations are 30,600, and if the future
is to be predicted by the past, 12,000 of those
cases will be successfully retired. He noted that
the problem of not having sufficient manpower indi-
cates that: the County can do nothing, and live
with the problem, do less patrol work and con-
centrate more on the public complaints. He stated
that in either case, there are still issues that
are not receiving attention. He revealed that more
people, radios, cars, desks and supervision can be
added, but this becomes an army of folks resulting
in government against community, and this is not
the politically smart way to go. He stated that
the preferred alternative is to work smarter with
the resources that the County has, and perhaps add
some resources as growth occurs throughout the
County. He indicated that the court system can be
used more often, and the coverage by the media gets
Page 3
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
CASE NO.
RESPONDENT:
MAY 19, 1989
the message out to the community that the County
will not tolerate those things that are in viola-
tion of the various ordinances.
Mr. Boyce reported that another way to the work
smarter approach is to become more involved with
the community, i.e. homeowners' associations, and
neighborhood associations. He stated that by
meeting and working with these groups, the message
can clearly be related to them. He advised that
Dennis Mazzone has done a particularly good job in
the inventory of the East Naples area.
Mr. Boyce stated that the newest management tool
that the County has is the Code Enforcement Board,
noting that the use of it will make a big dif-
ference in the community.
.*.
CEB #89-001
Mr. William Smith, Code Enforcement Coordinator and
Secretary to the Code Enforcement Board, advised
that Composite Exhibit "A" is being submitted as
evidence in Code Enforcement Case 89-001.
John Evangelisto
VIOLATION:
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 671 Hernando Drive, Marco Island, FL.
Ordinances 82-2, and 76-15.
REPRESENTED BY: Attorney James M. Karl II
COMMENTS:
Code Enforcement Coordinator Smith reported that
Mr. John Evangelisto has, on many occasions, since
December, 1987, illegally used land by parking a
major recreational vehicle and commercial vehicles
on premises zoned for residential purposes within
Collier County. He advised that these violations
occurred on Mr. Evangelisto's residential premises
at 671 Hernando Drive, and on the adjacent vacant
lot described as Lot 27, Block 384 Unit 12, Marco
Beach. He noted that the documents contained in
Composite Exhibit "A", prove that the respondent
has been repeatedly advised to cease these viola-
tions since December, 1988.
Page 4
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
Mr. Smith noted that a letter dated December 16,
1987, from Attorney James M. Karl II, representing
Mr. Evangelisto, acknowledged the Notice of
Violation, and stated that no further violation
would occur. He advised that on the same date,
Investigator Morad issued a written warning to Mr.
Evangelisto. He further reported that on January
5, 1989, Investigator Conti sent another Notice of
Violation to Mr. Evangelisto, advising him to imm-
ediatly remove all vehicles from the vacant lot.
He revealed that on March 20 and 21, 1989, sur-
veillance of a motor home determined illegal
parking over a 24-hour maximum allowable period for
loading and unloading before or prior to a trip,
and parking in the vacant lot took place again. He
stated that logs of repeated violations maintained
by Compliance Services document that the these
violations took place almost daily in March and
April of 1989.
Mr. Smith advised that on April 14, 1989, Assistant
State Attorney Donald Day received the evidence and
found sufficient probable cause to exist to sign an
Affidavit for the filing of Information For
Misdemeanor charge of illegal land use.
Investigator John Conti, after being sworn in,
stated that after the documents pertaining to this
case had been submitted, he continued to keep a
log of the above mentioned address of the RV
parking in the driveway, and of the adjacent lot.
He submitted the updated log and photos for the
record.
Mr. Smith stated that the three photographs will
become Composite Exhibit "G", and the updated daily
log sheet, dated from 4-07-89 through 5-18-89 shall
become Composite Exhibit "H". *
Investigator Tom Bartoe, after being sworn in,
advised that he has been checking the subject resi-
dence twice a day from April 6, 1989, until this
morning. He stated that each time he observed the
residence, the motor home was parked either in the
driveway, or in the adjacent lot, noting that it
was still present as of 6:50 A.M. this morning.
Mr. Smith introduced as evidence, a photograph
dated 5-19-89, which shall become Composite Exhibit
Page 5
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
"I"; and four pages of logging sheets dated from
4-6-89 through 5-19-89, which shall become
Composite Exhibit "J". *
Attorney James L. Karl II of Frost & Jacobs, repre-
senting Mr. Evangelisto, stated that he pledges
support for the Compliances Services Department and
this Board which will benefit the community. He
indicated that the County has been flooded with
numerous complaints from various neighbors against
Mr. Evangelisto, and he is attempting to resolve
the issue.
Attorney Karl cross examined Code Compliance
Investigator Conti regarding the surveillance of
Mr. Evangelisto's residence which took place on
March 20 and 21, 1989. In response to Mr. Karl, Mr.
Conti advised that a continuance surveillance was
conducted from a home under construction, down the
street from Mr. Evangelisto's residence which began
at 7:00 A.M. on March 20, 1989 and continued
through March 21, 1989 at 7:30 A.M. He indicated
that the investigators worked 4 and 8 hour shifts,
and that the residence in question was constantly
in view of one of the investigators.
After being sworn in, Mr. Smith reported that he
relieved Mr. Conti at 11:45 P.M. on March 20, 1989,
and noted that the motor home was parked on the
side of the house in the vacant lot and was visible
at all times. He stated that at 6:50 A.M. on March
21, 1989, the vehicle was moved from the vacant lot
and parked in the driveway of Mr. Evangelisto's
home.
Attorney Karl submitted a typewritten letter from
Dr. Gursoy, M.D., dated May 17, 1989, advising of
Mr. Evangelisto's prostrate problem (Letter docu-
mented as Respondent's Exhibit "1"), and a receipt
from Allard's Storage (Respondent's Exhibit "2").*
After being sworn in, Mr. John Evangelisto stated
that he does have a medical problem, and that the
bathroom in his motor home is used to accommodate
him. He indicated that he does in fact pay a
rental fee for the use of a storage unit at Allard's
of Marco where the vehicle can be stored. He
further noted that he also has access to 103
parking spaces at a restaurant that he is building.
Page 6
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
In answer to Mr. Karl, Mr. Evangelisto replied that
on March 20 or 21, 1989, he was out of the house
very early and used the motor home to get gas, and
then he went fishing. Mr. Karl introduced a
receipt for gas dated 3-21-89 in the amount of
$25.00, as Respondent's Exhibit "3". *
Mr. Karl questioned whether Mr. Evangelisto is
willing to change his habits so that the motor home
is at his residence for less time? Mr. Evangelisto
stated that he is willing to use one of his other
vehicles or a bicycle to go back and forth from his
property to a location where he will park the motor
home.
Code Enforcement Supervisor Clark questioned
whether it is possible for Mr. Evangelisto to park
his motor home at locations other than at his resi-
dence, and if he realizes that he was in violation
of the ordinance by parking the vehicle at his
home? Mr. Evangelisto replied that he will make
arrangements to park the vehicle at one of his com-
mercial lots. He added that he did not believe
that was violating the ordinance since he made
attempts to move the vehicle within a 24-hour
period.
Mr. Strain questioned whether Mr. Evangelisto had
informed anyone from the County of his medical
problems? Mr. Evangelisto replied that he made
mention of his medical problems to Mr. Conti some
time ago.
Mr. Andrews stated that it appears that the Staff
of the Code Compliance Department attempted to
cooperate with Mr. Evangelisto to make him aware of
his violation. He noted that they sent a
registered letter to him advising of a deadline of
January 12, 1989 to correct the issue, and yet Mr.
Evangelisto ignored the notification.
Mr. Constantine asked if Mr. Evangelisto had been
contacted by the County between January and the
present time? Mr. Evangelisto replied negatively.
Mr. Clark stated that Mr. Evangelisto has been
notified, adding that Staff has also talked with
his attorney to explain the County's position once
again. He indicated that what is baffling to
Page 7
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
Staff, is the fact that even though Mr. Evangelisto
has been notified and there have been conversations
with his attorney up until last week, and knowing
that he was to appear before this Board, the viola-
tion still persisted. He indicated that Mr. Karl's
letter of December 16, 1988, stated that his client
will take the necessary steps to comply with the
zoning ordinance and his motor home will not be in
a residential zone for more than a 24-hour period
following a trip. However, he advised that on
March 20 and 21, 1989, Staff found that this viola-
tion is still taking place. He noted that it is
unfortunate that the County has had to spend the
resources that it has to resolve this matter.
Attorney Karl introduced as evidence, a series of
13 photographs of various sites on Marco Island
where commercial and recreational vehicles are
parked (Respondent's Composite Exhibit "4"). *
Mr. Smith disclosed that at this time, Compliance
Services has approximately $1,950 invested in
direct and associated labor costs to the taxpayers
relating to the case against Mr. Evangelisto. He
advised that taking into consideration associated
motor vehicles, gasoline expenses, and costs for
additional man hours of the investigators present
for today's hearing, costs are approximately
$3,000. He noted that this does not allow for
costs of the County Attorney's Staff and other
agency costs associated with these violations. He
indicated that it is unfortunate and unfair to the
citizens of Collier County for one man to waste
this amount of the County's resources because he
chose to ignore the law. He advised that it would
not have cost Mr. Evangelisto any money to comply
with the ordinance, but he chose to repeatedly
violate the ordinance and infringe on the rights of
his neighbors, and all of the taxpayers of Collier
County. He stated that if Mr. Evangelisto were to
be fined the maximum of $250 per day for each day
of the violation, the fine total would be several
thousand dollars. He advised that the Compliance
Services Section is recommending $250 for 4 days of
the violations, or $1,000, and further recommends
that the Board impose an additional $250 per day
fine if the violations are repeated beginning
tomorrow morning, May 20, 1989.
Page 8
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
Mr. Lamoureux stated that it appears that Mr.
Evangelisto has been using his vehicle to go to and
from work, and questioned whether this constitutes
a violation of the ordinance? Assistant County
Attorney Wilson replied affirmatively.
Mr. Andrews stated that he agrees with Mr. Smith's
recommendation, since Mr. Evangelisto has caused a
great deal of expense to the County.
Attorney Karl indicated that he believes that it lS
unfair to say that Mr. Evangelisto has caused
expenditures to the County, noting that he was
hired from day one to do the exact opposite and
have communications with the County to resolve the
issue. He noted that the County decided to expend
these resources between January and the present
time without contacting him.
There were no other speakers regarding this case.
Mrs. Connelly stated that the presentation of evi-
dence for Case #89-001 is completed, and the
hearing is closed.
Mr. Strain questioned the rules and regulations of
this Board regarding fines to be imposed, and he
noted that based on the recommendation of Staff it
seems that the fine will be retroactive. He
questioned whether this Board is permitted to do
this, since an order to comply has not been issued?
MOTION:
Mrs. Wilson advised that since this Board has not
issued an order to comply, and to be technically
correct, a date for compliance should be set, and
the fine would begin from that date.
Made by Mr. Andrews that based on the findings of
fact and the evidence as presented, Mr. John
Evangelisto is the owner of the property at 671
Hernando Drive, Marco Island Florida, and one 1987
Cross Country Motor Home, and he is in violation of
ordinances 82-2 and 87-67, sections 7.11 and 9.7(1)
of the Collier County Code for illegally parking a
recreational vehicle in a residential zone.
Seconded by Mr. Williams. Carried unanimously.
Made by Mr. strain to issue an order to comply,
effective immediately, and failure for compliance
MOTION:
Page 9
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
AMENDED
MOTION:
MAY 19, 1989
will begin tomorrow morning with the maximum
penalty of $250 per day for each violation from
that day forward. Seconded by Mr. Andrews.
Mrs. Connelly amended Mr. Strain's motion by
changing "immediately" to May 19, 1989 at 1:00 P.M.
Messrs. strain and Andrews accepted the amendment.
carried unanimously.
* Exhibits were not received by the Clerk's Office.
CASE NO.
RESPONDENT:
***
*** Recess 10:55 A.M. - 11:05 A.M. ***
89-002
Code Enforcement Coordinator Smith stated that
Composite Exhibit liB" is being submitted as evi-
dence in Code Enforcement Case 89-002.
Donald Geckler
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: Rear of 2596 - 47th St. S.W., Golden Gate
Ordinance 82-2 Section 8.8
VIOLATION:
COMMENTS:
Mr. William Smith, Code Enforcement Coordinator,
stated that on November 8, 1988, and subsequent
dates, a Ford Pickup truck, orange in color, was
parked at the rear of 2596 47th St. S.W., Golden
Gate, Florida. He noted that the vehicle was
parked or stored at the residentially zoned pro-
perty without current plates, and not in a comple-
tely enclosed building as required by the
ordinance. He indicated that Notice of Violation
was provide on November 10, 1988, with a red tag
with notice to correct. He advised that subsequent
notices of violation were served by the Sheriff's
Office on November 28, 1988, and February 13, 1989.
Mr. Smith reported that rechecks of the subject
property on March 7, and May 16, 1989 revealed that
the vehicle was still present and in violation of
the ordinance. He added that a recheck on May 17,
1989 at 8:00 P.M. by Supervisor Clark revealed that
the violative vehicle has been removed from the
property.
Page 10
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
After being sworn in, Mr. Donald Geckler stated
that the subject vehicle is owned by his son,
adding that the truck's engine was destroyed and it
did not fit into his garage. He advised that a
facility has been rented on Enterprise Avenue,
where the truck will remain until it is repaired,
plated, and insured.
In answer to Mr. Clark, Mr. Geckler affirmed that
he is guilty of the charged violation, adding that
this issue will not reoccur.
Mr. Lamoureux asked Mr. Geckler if he will give
this Board his word that the violation will not be
repeated either by this vehicle or any other
vehicle? Mr. Geckler replied affirmatively.
There were no other speakers regarding this case.
Mrs. Connelly stated that the presentation of evi-
dence relating to Case #89-002 is completed, and
the hearing is closed.
MOTION:
Made by Mr. strain, that based on the findings of
fact, Donald and Sally Geckler are owners of record
of subject property, and are found in violation of
Ordinance 82-2 section 8.8, for property located at
2596 - 47th st. S.W.; Code Enforcement Board has
jurisdiction of the respondent, and Mr. Donald
Geckler was present at the public hearing; all
notices required by Collier County Ordinance 88-89
have been properly issued. Seconded by Mr.
Andrews. Carried unanimously. ---
Made by Mr. strain to issue an immediate order to
comply, with compliance set for tomorrow, and a
fine assessed at $100 per day thereafter for any
violation of Ordinance 82-2 section 8.8. Seconded
by Mr. Andrews.
MOTION:
For purposes of clarification, Mrs. Connelly stated
that because Mr. Geckler has removed the vehicle,
compliance has already occurred, and there is no
need to issue the order to comply.
AMENDED
MOTION:
Mrs. Connelly amended Mr. strain's motion to read:
that Mr. Geckler must remain in compliance from
tomorrow forth. Messrs. strain and Andrews
accepted the amendment. carried unanimously.
Page 11
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
***
CASE NO.
CEB #89-003
Mr. Clark advised that this case has been continued
by Staff until the next scheduled hearing in an
effort to resolve this issue with Mr. Ayala's
attorney.
***
CASE NO.
CEB #89-004
Mr. Smith advised that Composite Exhibit "D" is
being submitted as evidence in Code Enforcement
Case 89-004.
RESPONDENT:
Mr. Paul Herskowitz
LOCATION OF VIOLATION: 260 Quail Forest Boulevard, Naples
REPRESENTED BY:
Warren Schob of Beacon Properties
COMMENTS:
Mr. Smith reported that there is a large pile of
construction debris, concrete, trees and lumber on
the subject property. He noted that the violation
was discovered on January 20, 1989.
Mr. Smith stated that several discussions were held
with the property owner and his agent to remove
the violation. He remarked that on April 29, 1989,
Notice of Violation was sent via certified mail,
ordering correction by May 5, 1989. He advised
that a recheck of the violation after that date
indicates that the violation still remains.
Code Compliance Investigator Tomasino, after being
sworn in, stated that up until this past Wednesday,
there was nothing done to correct the violation.
However, he noted that the owner has recently taken
corrective measures to remove the pile of debris.
He indicated that as of 7:30 A.M. today, half of
the debris has been removed. He stated that he
believes that the pile of debris can be totally
removed by Monday morning.
Mr. Clark advised that with regard to the violation
as introduced into evidence, Compliance Services
has approximately $450 of taxpayers' money invested
Page 12
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
in this case. He noted that Staff is recommending
that if, in fact, the Board finds that the facts
substantiate the allegations, and the violation
continues to exist, that a reasonable amount of
time, not longer than five days, be given for
compliance, and if the violation exists, the
respondent be assessed a fine in the amount of $150
per day for each day thereafter.
After being sworn in, Mr. Warren Schob, repre-
senting Mr. Herskowitz, stated that on Monday, May
15th, a contract was entered into with Bonita
Limestone Transportation, Inc. to begin removal of
the pile of debris in the amount of $12,000. He
indicated that he believes that with three dump
truck running continuously, the pile can be totally
removed by tomorrow.
Mr. Pedone questioned why it took until the present
time to contract with a company to remove the
debris? Mr. Schob replied that there is construc-
tion taking place on the adjoining property, and
dumping was taking place from that site, and it was
felt that some of the debris was not on the subject
property, but on the adjacent property. He stated
that Mr. Herskowitz had originally tried to resolve
the problem with the construction team from the
adjoining property, but he was unable to get them
to cooperate.
In response to Mrs. Connelly, Mr. Schob presented a
copy of the contract with Bonita Limestone
Transportation, Inc. (Respondent's Exhibit "1"). *
Mr. Clark questioned whether Mr. Schob recognizes
that there is the existence of a violation, and
that he agrees to remove it? Mr. Schob replied
affirmatively.
Mrs. Connelly questioned whether this is a
situation that could possibly reoccur? Mr. Clark
stated that this is a possibility, and the owner of
record is responsible for any piles of debris.
Mr. Schob advised that there are three entrances
and exits into subject property. He noted that
barricades will be placed on the property to pre-
vent the violation from reoccuring.
Page 13
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
There were no other speakers regarding this case.
Mrs. Connelly stated that the presentation of evi-
dence for Case #89-004 is completed, and the
hearing is closed.
MOTION:
Made by Mr. strain that based on the findings of
fact! Mr. Warren Schob of Beacon Properties, repre-
sent1ng Mr. Paul Herskowitz who is the managing
partner of Naples Associates Limited, owners of
record of sUbject property; Code Enforcement Board
has jurisdiction of the persons of the respondent,
and that Warren Schob of Beacon pro~erties was pre-
sent at the public hearing; all not1ces required by
Collier County Ordinance 88-89 have been properly
issued; the property located at the rear of 260
Quail Forest Boulevard, described as vacant pro-
perty is in violation of sections 5 and 7 of
Collier County Ordinance 88-45, as amended, in the
following particulars: accumulation of construc-
tion debris. Seconded by Mr. Andrews. Carried
unanimously.
Made by Mr. Constantine that correction of the
violation is to be completed on or before May 24,
1989, and if the respondent does not comply with
this order on or before that date, a fine will be
assessed in the amount of $150 ~er day for each and
every day a violation, as descr1bed within the
ordinance, reoccurs or continues past said date.
Seconded by Mr. Williams.
MOTION:
Mr. Pedone related that the respondent has had suf-
ficient time to have the debris cleaned up since he
was advised of the violation on January 30, 1989.
He indicated that he believes that the message that
is going out today is that a respondent can wait
until he comes before this Board, and agrees to
bring the violation into compliance, and walks away
with no fine or punishment. He stated that he
believes the fine should be assessed as of this
afternoon or tomorrow morning.
Mr. Strain stated that he would normally tend to
agree with Mr. Pedone, but the exception is that it
has not been proven that the owner of subject pro-
perty deposited the debris, and he was caught in
the middle. Therefore, he noted that in this
regard, he believes that he should be given a
little slack. He noted that there are two viola-
tions: Sections 5 and 7.
Page 14
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
AMENDED
MOTION:
Mr. constantine amended his motion to reflect a
fine in the amount of $150 per day per violation of
sections 5 and 7 of Ordinance 88-45. Mr. Williams
accepted the amendment. Carried unanimously.
* Exhibit was not received by the Clerk's Office.
***
ITEM
New Business
COMMENTS:
Mr. Strain referred to the matter of calling atten-
tion to the fact that there were violations
relating to two sections of Ordinance 88-45 in Case
#89-004. He noted that the top of Page "C" of
Composite Exhibit "D" refers to the Ordinance as
88-45 County Code Section 5.7, and two paragraphs
down states Ordinance 88-45, Sections 5, 6, and 7.
He indicated that if the respondent were to
challenge that, there may be some problems.
Mr. Clark thanked Mr. Strain for bringing this
matter to his attention.
***
A brief discussion followed regarding the respon-
dent's responsibility to provide for a verbatim of
the proceedings. Mrs. Wilson advised that the
reason this is restated at each meeting, is that
there is a recording available of each meeting that
a respondent may obtain, if he so desires.
Mr. Clark stated that in the event a recording is
not able to be transcribed, it is still the respon-
sibility of the respondent to provide for a ver-
batim transcript of the proceedings.
***
Mrs. Connelly suggested that many problems can be
avoided if at the time a motion is being made, the
Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Order Form is
used, and the Secretary to this Board can jot down
the facts, and if he finds that something has been
left out, he can call this to the attention of the
Board.
Page 15
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
ITEM:
COMMENTS:
Mr. Clark stated that he would prefer that Mrs.
Connelly, as Chairman of this Board, make the
notes, and they will be reduced to writing within
10 ten days.
***
Mrs. Wilson explained the use of the Conflict of
Interest Forms. She advised that these forms must
state the date of the hearing, the nature of the
conflict, why a Board member is abstaining from
voting. She indicated that this form must be filed
within 15 days with the Clerk.
Mr. Williams questioned whether a member of this
Board is required to remove himself from the
meeting when he is abstaining from a particular
case? Mrs. Wilson stated that she will ascertain
whether there is a specific policy on this issue,
and advise prior to next month's meeting.
***
Workshop
Mr. Strain requested that a workshop be held immed-
iately following today's regular meeting, to
discuss the Rules and Regulations of the Code
Enforcement Board.
***
Report by Richard R. Clark
Mr. Clark stated that Staff did a lot of investiga-
tive work which involved extensive preparation, and
he feels that they did an excellent job. He noted
that all three persons that were brought before the
Board today were found guilty.
Mr. Clark advised that Mr. Evangelisto is also
charged before Criminal Court, which does have
retroactive capabilities of imposing fines. He
noted that even though the Code Enforcement Board
cannot impose retroactive fines, the Courts can.
Mr. Clark related that the issue of St. Matthew's
House will be brought before this Board on June 22,
Page 16
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY
MAY 19, 1989
1989. He noted that the existence of this facility
is not based on feelings, but merely on facts of
the ordinance or code violations.
Mr. Clark indicated that the Compliance Services
Section is very involved with the Housing Code
Administration of that ordinance, and there have
been a number of residences which have been disco-
vered which are extremely substandard. He advised
that a substantial number (23) of dwelling units
that were unsafe have been demolished in the
rmmokalee and Naples area. He stated that he is
pleased to see this Board taking the responsibility
that it is, and thanked all members for their par-
ticipation.
***
ITEM:
Next Meeting Date Set For June 22, 1989 - 9:00 A.M.
COMMENTS:
It was determined that due to the possibility of
the length of next month's meeting, the meeting
will be held on June 22, 1989 at 9:00 A.M.
***
ITEM:
Meeting for July 13, 1989 to be held at 9:00 A.M.
***
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by
Order of the Chair - Time: 12:30 P.M.
COLLIER COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
Darlene Connelly, Chairman
Page 17