The URL can be used to link to this page

DSAC Agenda 07/06/2011 R Agenda Development Services Advisory Committee Regular Meeting July 6, 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA July 6, 2011 3:00 p.m. Conference Room 610 NOTICE: Persons wishing to speak on any Agenda item will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the Chairman adjusts the time. Speakers are required to fill out a "Speaker Request Form," list the topic they wish to address, and hand it to the Staff member seated at the table before the meeting begins. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman, and speak into a microphone. State your name and affiliation before commenting. During discussion, Committee Members may direct questions to the speaker. Please silence cell phones and digital devices. There may not be a break in this meeting. Please leave the room to conduct any personal business. All parties participating in the public meeting are to observe Roberts Rules of Order, and wait to be recognized by the Chairman. Please speak one at a time and into the microphone so the Hearing Reporter can record all statements being made. I. Call to Order - Chairman II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of Minutes from June 1, 2011 Meeting IV. Public Speakers V. Staff Announcements/Updates A. Public Utilities Division Update - Nathan Beals B. Fire Review Update - Ed Riley C. Growth Management DivisionlTransportation Planning - Jay Ahmad D. Growth Management Division/Planning & Regulation Update - Jamie French VI. Old Business A. Fire Line Requirement Review [Nathan Beals, George Yilmaz] VII. New Business A. Permit process for AlC replacements in multi-family buildings [Jim Turner] B. Licensing timeline to obtain a permit after a "Cease & Desist" has been issued [Mike Ossorio] C. Performance Measure report [Requested by Bill Varian to discuss] VIII. Committee Member Comments IX. Adjourn Next Meetina Dates August 3, 2011 September 7, 2011 October 5, 2011 November 2,2011 December 7,2011 GMD Conference Room 610 - 3:00 pm GMD Conference Room 610 - 3:00 pm GMD Conference Room 610 - 3:00 pm GMD Conference Room 610 - 3:00 pm GMD Conference Room 610- 3:00 pm June 1,2011 MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING June 1, 2011 - Naples, Florida LET IT BE REMEMBERED that the Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 3 :00 PM in REGULAR SESSION in Conference Room #610, Collier County Growth Management DivisionIPlanning & Regulation, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following Members present: CHAIRMAN: Vice Chair: William Varian David Dunnavant Ray Allain James Boughton (Excused) Clay Brooker Laura Spurgeon Dejohn Dalas Disney Marco Espinar Blair Foley Reagan Henry (Absent) George Hermanson David Hurst Reed Jarvi Robert Mulhere Mario Valle ALSO PRESENT: Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator, GMD Planning & Regulation Judy Puig, Operations Analyst - Staff Liaison Jamie French, Director - Operations & Regulatory Management Jay Ahmad, P.E., Director - Transportation Engineering Ed Riley, Fire Code Official- Fire Code Office Nathan Beals, Project Manager - Public Utilities Kenneth Rech, P.E., Director - Environmental Health/Engineering Claudine Auclair, Manager - Business Center Amy Patterson, Impact Fee and Economic Development Manager June 1,2011 I. Call to Order: Chairman William Varian called the meeting to order at 3:00 PM and read the procedures to be observed during the meeting. II. Approval of A!!:enda: Change: · Blair Foley requested to revise the order of the Agenda to hear Item VII - A., "New Business," first. Marco Espinar moved to approve the Agenda as amended. Second by George Hermanson. Carried unanimously, 12 - O. (Clay Brooker arrived at 3:04 PM) III. Approval of Minutes - May 4, 2011 Meeting: Correction: · David Hurst was inadvertently marked as "excused." He did attend the meeting. Reed Jarvi moved to approve the Minutes for the May 4, 2011 meeting as amended. Second by Marco Espinar. Carried unanimously, 13 - O. IV. Public Speaker: (Melissa Ahern, CBIA - will be heard when Item is discussed.) VII. New Business: A. Report: State Audit of the Heath Department - Kenneth R. Rech, P.E., Director - Environmental Health and Engineering Blair Foley: · Subject: Septic system designs, inspections, and permitting procedures in Collier County · Report/evaluation is approximately 47 pages in length · Will ask for the topic to be included on next month's Agenda to enable Committee members to review the document with additional input from Staff Background information: . DEP Report was dated May 12,2011 · May 26, 2011 - Correspondence was sent to Septic Contractors and Site Evaluators concerning revisions to the checklist regarding how permits will be reviewed and inspections conducted. o The revisions were effective immediately. Mr. Foley suggested reviewing the changes in the same manner as changes to the Land Development Code, i.e., vet through the Utilities Subcommittee with input from Industry and Staff. 2 June 1,2011 Blair Foley noted new LDC Amendments are specific concerning the effective date. He expressed concern for permits in the "queue" and clients who are trying to update their septic systems but could not make adjustments because they did not receive proper notification. Kenneth Rech: · Collier County's Health Department is part of the Florida Department of Health · The audit of the County's programs was conducted in November, 2010 · Some changes have been put into place · Copies of the Memorandum dated May 26th outlining a number of changes and the checklist entitled "Onsite Sewage Treatment Disposal System Repair - Residential" were distributed to the Committee. Chairman Varian noted the Contractors were caught "off guard" by the audit and the required changes. Mr. Foley stated the Report noted a follow-up report is to be submitted in six months (from the date of issuance) detailing the Health Department's progress. He asked if this indicated that the Industry had time to phase in the changes. Dalas Disney requested an overview of the revisions and why the changes were required. Mr. Rech stated the primary cause was a change in interpretation by the auditor for the State's Department of Health. He noted audits of the County's programs are conducted every three years and the November audit was conducted by a different auditor. He further stated there were marked changes in interpretation on a number of items. Reference was made to the Memorandum, i.e., Site evaluations must utilize specific scientific language to properly document the indicator that identifies the Seasonal High Water Table ("SHWT"). Twenty-four specific points were outlined in the Memorandum. Discussion ensued concerning the F AC 64E-6 requirements and how to satisfy them. It was noted physical permits going back to the early' 80s are available. Additional documentation is available in various log books. Time line: · April 18: County received a draft of the initial audit · May 19: County submitted a Corrective Action Plan based on the draft · May 20: County received the final version of the draft which had been revised by the State on May 1 ih but not forwarded to the County · May 24: State sent an email accepting the County's Corrective Action Plan Mr. Rech has requested a meeting with representatives from the State's Program Office to discuss the Audit to determine the best methods to achieve compliance. George Hermanson cautioned there is very little flexibility or room for negotiation when dealing with the State, and further stated there is limited opportunity for input. 3 June 1,2011 It was noted the last audit took place in 2007 and only four corrections ("findings") were necessary. It is possible to apply to the State for a variance. A question was asked if there was an appeal process with the State since it appeared the problem was Auditor's interpretation. · Example: the Auditor was in the field with Staff and stated he did not agree with the "Wet Season Water Table" on a particular job, but he did not provide documentation. Comment: "Is there a standard for interpretation or is it just a 'moving target'? It seems to be arbitrary and capricious." Melissa Ahern, CBIA, stated a concern of the Industry was in regard to the requirements being enforced that were not codified. She requested the FAC or other Code for each requirement being implemented. Mr. Rech replied some of the policies were twenty years old, but they were not put into a Code. It was noted the Health Department is not permitted to interpret the Code but can only follow the interpretations provided by the Program Office. The Permitting Process was explained, including the option to apply for a variance. There was a discussion concerning enforcement of the Code by the Health Department, including Permits by Affidavit. The Health Department has Citation authority, with fines up to $500 per day. Chairman Varian asked to be notified if a meeting is scheduled with the State, and if the State Representative could appear before DSAC. V. Growth Mana!!:ement Division - Staff AnnouncementslUDdates: A. Public Utilities Division: Nathan Beals, Project Manager - Public Utilities · Jim Delony, the Administrator for Public Utilities, resigned on May 27, 2011 and an Interim Administrator, Dr. George Yilmaz, has been appointed. · Joe Thomas resigned in December; a new Water Distribution Manager will start work in July. · The Discussion Group met on May 17th and the "Approved Product List" was revised to add more options for meters B. Fire Review: Ed Riley, Fire Code Official- Fire Code Office · Monthly Activity Report for April was submitted. o Reviews conducted: 686 (less than in March) · The move to the new building has been delayed for approximately two weeks due to IT problems. C. Transportation Planning Division: Jay Ahmad, P.E., Director - Transportation Engineering · The Oil Well Road project is approximately 55% complete. o A multi-use asphalt pathway has been installed. 4 June 1,2011 · Bids for the Davis/Collier Project were opened; there is a protest due to underbidding of some segments. The Purchasing Department is investigating. A question was asked concerning the speed limit on Vanderbilt Drive, south of Wiggins Pass Road. Mr. Ahmad stated the limit is 35. (Blair Foley left at 4:00 PM) D. Planning and Regulation: Jamie French, Director - Operations & Regulatory Management · "CityView" - more issues were discovered and it is still not online o The IVR ("Interactive Voice Recognition") was not functioning properly and is currently undergoing testing o Check validation had stopped working · A search engine has been created to allow access to flood elevation certificates for properties · Re: refund of Land Development Fees for Inspections and Plan Reviews: o After review of data, it as determined that one percent has been held back for Staff time, i.e., $250 for administrative fees of $25,000 Chairman Varian requested that Michael Ossorio and Jim Turner attend the next DSAC meeting to explain Licensing's time line to obtain a permit after a "Cease and Desist" has been issued. VI. Old Business: A. Reconsideration of Previous RPZ Motion (April 6, 2011) - David Dunnavant B. Review and Approval of Letter to BCC regarding DSAC Recommendation David Dunnavant, as the motion maker, moved to withdraw the motion made and passed during the April 6, 2011 meeting. Second by David Hurst. David Dunnavant provided a brief review: · The Subcommittee reviewed the RPZ requirement on fire systems. · Resolution #2009-224 was passed in 2009 on a Consent Agenda without Industry input. · The Subcommittee determined that it did not understand the necessity for implementation of RPZs on fire systems since the incremental safety benefit does not match the cost to the Industry. · The existing Double Detector Check Valve assembly system has worked for years without an inherent risk to the safety, health and welfare of the citizens of Collier County. · Recommendation: Request that the BCC remove the stay currently in place on that portion of the Resolution to enforce the Ordinance, which eliminates the Double Detector Check Valve assembly, and to reinstate the DDCs as a suitable backflow device on fire systems. 5 June 1,2011 He noted the text of the Motion was included on Page 4 of the May 4th Minutes. George Hermanson stated he would abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Motion carried, 11 - "Yes"/l - "Abstention" (by George Hermanson). Chairman Varian noted a copy of the formal letter to the Board of County Commissioners had been distributed to the Members. David Dunnavant stated the letter contained the entire recommendation, as follows: "After extensive review of the issue and materials, DSAC has determined that the current Double Detector Check assembly system is not inherently dangerous to County's public water system users. It is the backflow protection device standard for fire systems nationwide of the American Water Works Association (AWWA). Although the safety of the water system would be enhanced by the installation of RPZs, the significant costs versus the nominal benefit of such enhancement does not warrant implementation and the additional expense to our County's citizens. Additionally, implementation of RPZs would create an increased friction loss to the system in comparison to the Double Detector Check assembly and will alter fire sprinkler design in the future for buildings that require this new backflow device, adding fire pumps at many locations. Further, implementation of RPZs to future projects provides no additional safety to the system as it is currently built out and to its current users. The possibility of the Utilities Division seeking RPZ assemblies in the future on existing buildings, with its higher friction loss, would render many existingfire protection systems inadequate, forcing significant expense on the citizens who own these buildings and also adding numerous mechanicalfire pumps that our Fire Departments would have to rely on in fighting fires. Last, the requirement in the Utilities Standards Manual that classifies a hydrant or FDC as a downstream connection that would require an RPZ assembly, instead of a Double Detector Check, is an unnecessary cost increase to our County. The Double Detector backflow device provides greater protection than the typical hydrant installation on our County water system. DSAC'sfinal recommendation is that the Board of County Commissioners repeal the portion of Resolution #2009-224 which implements RPZs as the only accepted backflow prevention device on fire systems, and return to the original Double Detector Check Assembly Valve system that has effectively been in place for years. And also requests that the Public Utilities Division modify the Utilities Standard Manual in Ordinance 2004-31 to allow the use of Double Detector Check Valve assemblies on fire systems when the only downstream connection is a fire hydrant or a fire department connection. The Motion was carried by unanimous vote with (1) Abstention of the Development Service Advisory Committee. " (Note: The changes made on Page 7 have been incorporated above.) 6 June 1,2011 David Dunnavant moved to approve DSAC'sfinal recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners that the Board repeal the portion of Resolution #2009-224 which implements RPZs as the only accepted backflow prevention device on fire systems, and return to the original Double Detector Check Assembly Valve system that has effectively been in place for years. And also, request that the Public Utilities Division modify the Utilities Standard Manual in Ordinance 2004-31 to allow the use of Double Detector Check Valve Assemblies onfire systems when the only downstream connection is a fire hydrant or a fire department connection. Second by Dalas Disney. Judy Puig will send the Conflict of Interest form to George Hermanson for signature. Discussion: David Hurst questioned Nathan Beals concerning the prior requirement for down- stream connections. Nathan Beals replied since 1997, the Standards have stated if there is a dedicated fire line with connections downstream, an RPZ is required. He defined "connections downstream" as hydrants, etc. David Hurst stated he thought the motion was to return the Ordinance to what was in place in 2008. David Dunnavant noted there are hydrants throughout the County that do not have any backflow prevention devices on them. He stated if Double Detector Checks are installed on hydrants, that provide more protection than is currently in place. He continued that part of the Subcommittee's discussion was that there was no logic to installing RPZs if it involved only a Fire Department connection or a hydrant downstream. Motion carried, 11- "Yes"/ 1- "Abstention" (by George Hermanson). The letter was reviewed and the following changes were made: · First Paragraph: Change "added costs" to "significant costs" · Second Paragraph: remove apostrophe from RPZs · Second Paragraph: (last line) add "to" between "and" - "its" · Second Page (continuation of previous paragraph); add "the Utilities Division" prior to "seeking" and change "a" to "an" · Third Paragraph: change Resolution 2009-22 to 2009-224 · Third Paragraph: (last line) add "or a Fire Department connection." to the end of the sentence. · Fourth Paragraph: add "with one abstention" to the end of the sentence. · Signature Line: Remove slash (I) between RPZ and Utilities under title for David Dunnavant David Hurst moved to approve the letter as revised. Second by Mario Valle. Motion carried, 11- "Yes"/ 1- ~~Abstention" (by George Hermanson). 7 June 1,2011 C. Update: School Board Impact Fee Subcommittee - Amy Patterson, Impact Fee and Economic Development Manager · A copy of the Executive Summary dated October 12, 2010 was distributed to the Committee. The Executive Summary recommended reducing Impact Fees by 50% with a retroactive effective date of October 8, 2010. . The Subcommittee met on April 8th · A copy of the draft of the School Impact Fee Update Study prepared by Tindale-Oliver, dated March 31,2011, was distributed to the DSAC members. · There were changes to credit calculations, land values (declined), and construction costs from the 2006 Study. Reed Jarvi asked what will happen to the reduced rates at the end of the recommended two-year period. Amy Patterson replied that the Board has several options: . To keep the 50% rates in effect, or . To bring to the Study Rates into effect. She noted by October, 2012, it will be time to conduct are-study. It was noted the School Board does not have any reserves in its Impact Fee fund. There was a discussion of land values for future school sites and how the figures were determined. Reed Jarvi considered the explanation by Tindale-Oliver to be inadequate and too high. Mario Valle referred to Table B-3 and noted land values for parcels owned by the School District in the eastern portions of the County have decreased according to the Assessed values in the Property Appraiser's Office. He stated land values in the Estates have dropped by approximately 90%. Mario Valle moved to approve accepting the School Impact Fee Impact Study and to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners. Second by Robert Mulhere. Motion carried, 11- "Yes"/ 1- "absent." (Note: George Hermanson briefly left the conference room during the discussion and did not return until after the vote was taken.) D. Project Request Application Questionnaire - Nick Casalanguida, Deputy Administrator, GMD Planning & Regulation, and Claudine Auclair, Manager - Business Center · A copy of the draft of the Project Screening Questionnaire was distributed to the members. · The Questionnaire has been reduced by several pages. · An Insubstantial Change can be submitted at the same time as a Building Permit application. · Two separate fees will still be charged. · Claudine Auclair asked for volunteers to serve on a Subcommittee to review potential changes to the Land Development Code (by Amendment) and the Administrative Code. 8 June 1,2011 · Reed Jarvi, Robert Mulhere, David Hurst, and Marco Espinar volunteered to serve on the Subcommittee. VIII. Committee Member Comments: · David Hurst noted his comments on Page 8 of the May 4th minutes were not what he intended to state. He requested to change the word "circumference" to "area," and to remove "it is dug 2 to 3 inches deeper" and insert "but it may be allowed to stage at approximately two to three inches higher." Next Meetin!!: Dates: (Meetings will commence at 3:00 PM unless noted below.) July 6, 2011 August 3, 2011 September 7, 2011 October 5, 2011 November 2, 2011 December 7, 2011 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chairman at 5:00 PM. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE William Varian, Chairman The Minutes were approved by the Board/Committee on "as submitted" U OR "as amended" U. ,2011, 9 Fire Plan Review - Time Frame Summary May-11 Number Number Average # of 1st % of 1st Percentages of of Time In Reviews Reviews Within Time Reviews Days Days Approved Approved Frames Architectural Reviews Total 526 1327 2.52 1st Review 369 1110 3.01 272 74% 100/10 Days 9 Day Max 2nd Review 125 161 1.29 98/3 Days 3rd Review 27 45 1.67 96/3 Days 4th Review 5 11 2.20 100/3 Days Total 2- 4 Reviews 157 217 1.38 98/3 Days 4 Day Max Fire Sprinkler Reviews Total 54 77 1.43 1st Review 35 62 1.77 21 60% 100/10 Days 4 Day Max 2nd Review 12 13 1.08 100/3 Days 3rd Review 5 0 0.00 100/3 Days 4th Review 1 1 1.00 100/3 Days 5th Review 1 1 1.00 100/3 Days Total 2-6 Reviews 19 15 0.79 100/3 Days 2 Day Max Underground Reviews Total 16 28 1.76 1st Review 10 23 2.30 6 60% 100/10 Days 4 Day Max 2nd Review 5 5 1.00 100/3 Days 3rd Review 1 0 0.00 1 00/3 Days Total 2.3 Reviews 6 5 0.83 100/3 Days 2 Day Max Fuel & LP Gas Reviews Total 2 0.60 1st Review 0 0.00 0 0% 100/10 Days o Day Max 2nd Review 1 1.00 100/3 Days Total 2nd Review 1 1.00 100/3 Days 1 Day Max Hood & FSUP Reviews Total 16 23 1.44 1st Review 11 17 1.55 3 27% 100/10 Days 6 Day Max 2nd Review 5 6 1.20 100/3 Days Total 2nd Review 5 6 1.20 100/3 Days 3 Day Max Fire Alann Reviews Total 108 216 2.00 1st Review 72 189 2.63 45 63% 100/10 Days 6 Day Max 2nd Review 33 25 0.76 100/3 Days 3rd Review 3 2 0.67 100/3 Days Total 2.3 Reviews 36 27 0.75 100/3 Days 1 Day Max ~ 1st Review 498 1401 2.81 347 70% 99/10 Days Corrections 224 271 1.21 100/3 Days Overall Totals 722 1672 2.32 Office of the Fire Code Official 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Napfes, FL 34104 Office of the Fire Code Official Summary of Plan Review Activity May-11 Architectural Reviews Sprinkler Reviews Underground Reviews Fuel & LP Gas Reviews Hoods & FSUP Reviews Alarm Reviews SDP Reviews Total # of Plans Reviewed Number of Work Days Average # of Plans Reviewed per Day ASAP Reviews per Building Department: Total # of ASAP Reviews.: Total ASAP Reviews per Day .Overtime Reviews are not included in this figure Scheduled Meetings/Hours: Ed: Bob: Jackie: Ricco: Maggie: Classes and Seminars attended by FCO: 5/2-5/6 Fire Service Course Delivery, Ocala Participant Robert Salvaggio Total Overtime Hours for the Fire Code Office .Overtime Hours Reimbursed by Contractors In addition to the above-mentioned tasks, The Fire Code Official's Office fields numerous phone calls, walk-ins, field inspections and impromptu meetings. Office of the Fire Code OfftClat 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 526 54 16 2 16 108 72 794 21 38 7 Architectural per Collier County 13 AC Change Out 7 Low Voltage 3 Tents 30 1 57.50 Hrs. 12.25 Hrs. 3.75 Hrs. 79.00 Hrs. 0.75 Hrs. o o COLLIER COUNTY UTILITIES STANDARDS MANUAL TABLE OF REVISIONS COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITIES PLANNING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AS OF 07/2011 CHANGES TO UTILITIES Section Sub-Section/ Detail # Revision Summary 1 1.4 Update meter requirements to only require leak detection meters on fire service lines. 3 W-8 Add detail, oreviouslv deleted, and update. 3 W-9 Update detail. 3 W-9A Uodate detail. 3 W-10 Delete detail. 3 W-11 Add detail, oreviouslv deleted, and update. 3 W-11A Update detail. 3 W-15 Delete detail. 3 W-16 Add detail, previouslv deleted, and uodate. 4 Appendix G Update list. Page 1 of 1 Proposed Revision to Section 1, Desian Criteria Proposed additions in text are noted in bold. Proposed deletions in text are noted in strike through. Section 1, Design Criteria, Page 6, text revisions in 1.4 1.4 Fire Service Systems All private fire service systems for sprinkler systems, wet standpipe systems, and privately- owned or controlled distribution systems shall be metered v:ith a Fire Servioe, line sized, meter aAEt-shall be installed with an appropriate back flow prevention device with a leak detection meter. The meter shall be owned and maintained by the private service owner. The COUNTY requires all privately-owned backflow devices to be certified at the time of installation and on an annual basis by a Certified Back Flow Tester (University of Florida, TREEO Center, or equivalent certification program). The results shall be submitted to the County Manager or designee. The County Manager or designee will require all privately owned metering devices to be certified for accuracy at the time of installation. Fire meter devices using a three quarter to two inch (%" to 2") metering device shall be re-calibrated to manufacturer's specifications every five (5) years, replaced every ten (10) years, or replaced immediately upon meter failure. Fire meter devices greater than two inches (2") shall be re-calibrated to manufacturer's specifications every five (5) years and replaced immediately upon meter failure. The County Manager or designee will inform the owner by mail prior to the due date. Private owner(s) shall submit certification results to the County Manager or designee within sixty (60) days of the due date. 1.4.1 Fire Service Meters for Residential Systems Residential projects such as, but not limited to, single family, multi-family condominiums, trailer parks, mobile home parks, etc. utilizing a master meter shall pass all fire flow through such meter. The meter shall be sized to pass the domestic coincident draft plus rated fire flow at the AWNA pressure loss specifications. 1.4.2 Fire Service Meters for Commercial and Other Non-residential Systems Commercial projects such as, but not limited to, shopping centers, malls, retail, and industrial buildings shall pass all fire flow through a potable master meter or have a separate fire service connection to the water distribution main. The Fire Service meter and isolation valves shall be extended above final grade as shown in the Utilities Detail Drawings. For meter reading purposes, metering devices shall lie within a County Utility Easement (CUE) that shall be dedicated separately to the Board for the appropriate Water-Sewer District or in conjunction with the easements for anyon-site utility system(s). The Owner shall purchase and install an appro'ted /\MR meter ana approved backflow devices with a leak detection meter at no expense to the appropriate Water-Sewer District. PROPERTY OWNER MAINTENANCE TO THIS POINT CONCRETE FOUNDATION FULL LENGTH OF ASSEMBLY (TYP) 4' WIDE, 6" THICK 6" x 6" 1 Ox 1 0 WELDED WIRE MESH DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR BACK FLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY SUPPLIED WITH AMMONIA AND CHLORINE RESISTANT SEATS AND SILICONE RUBBER SEALS. UL/FM APPROVED FOR FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY COUNTY ORDINANCE AND AWWA M-14 (SEE APPROVED BACKFLOW DEVICES, APPENDIX G) RISING STEM AND RESILIENT SEAT (TYPICAL 2 PLACES) FLANGED GATE VALVE FLOW -- NOTES: 1. ASSEMBLY WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNER, STARTING AFTER THE INLlNE GATE VALVE AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. 2. COUNTY WILL REQUIRE DEDICATION OF MATERIAL UP TO AND INCLUDING THE INLlNE GATE VALVE FROM THE COUNTY'S WATER MAIN. 3. BACKFLOW DEVICE REQUIRES INITIAL CERTIFICATION BY AN APPROVED CERTIFIED TESTER WITH RESULTS AND ANNUAL TEST RESULTS SUBMllTED TO THE COUNTY WATER DEPARTMENT. 4. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1.5' FROM EDGE OF SLAB, AND SHALL PROVIDE A 3' ACCESS OPENING. 5. THIS ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PAINTED WITH RED EPOXY PAINT. 6. ALL COMPONENTS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH DRINKING WATER SHALL CONFORM TO NSF STANDARD 61. 7. A REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE USED WHEN HIGH HAZARDS (AS DEFINED BY AWWA M-14) EXIST. 3" AND SMALLER FIRE SYSTEM DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY DETAIL NTS W-8 REVISED: JULY 2011 2" REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY SUPPLIED WITH AMMONIA AND CHLORINE RESISTANT SEATS AND SILICONE RUBBER SEALS. UL!FM APPROVED FOR FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY COUNtY ORDINANCE AND AWWA M-14. (SEE APPROVED BACKFLOW DEVICES, APPENDIX G) LOCK OS&Y VALVE CLOSED 2" CURB STOP 12" SPOOL PIECE WITH 2" TAP FIRE PROTECTION METER (SEE COUNtY APPROVED PRODUCT LIST, APPENDIX F) UL!FM APPROVED FOR FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION (FACTORY ASSEMBLED WITH TOP ACCESS STRAINER ONLY) UBLIE CHECK BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY SUPPLIED WITH AMMONIA AND CHLORINE RESISTANT SEATS AND SILICONE RUBBER SEALS. UL!FM APPROVED FOR FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY COUNtY ORDINANCE AND AWWA M-14. (SEE APPROVED BACKFLOW DEVICES, APPENDIX G) RISING STEM AND RESILIENT SEAT FLANGED GATE VALVE (TYPICAL OF THREE) >' MJ 45' OR 90' BEND WITH RETAINER GLANDS MAIN SIZE PER UTILITY PLAN MAIN SIZE PER UTILITY PLAN NOTES: 1. ALL ABOVE GROUND PIPE SHALL BE FLANGED END DUCTILE IRON PIPE, PRESSURE ClASS 350. ALL NUTS AND BOLTS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 2. WATER MAIN EXTENSION AND ASSEMBLY IS REQUIRED TO BE FLUSHED, CHLORINATED AND GIVEN BACTERIAL CLEARANCE BY THE WATER DEPARTMENT LAB BEFORE PLACEMENT IN SERVICE. 3. BACK FLOW UNIT AND METER REQUIRES INITIAL CERTIFICATION FOR OPERATION AND ACCURACY WITH RESULTS AND ANNUAL TESTS SUBMITTED TO THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER DEPARTMENT. 4. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM TIE-IN AND ASSEMBLY CONNECTION. 5. THIS ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PAINTED WITH RED EPOXY PAINT. 6. ALL COMPONENTS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH DRINKING WATER SHALL CONFORM TO NSF STANDARD 61. 7. A 4'XS' SIGN WITH 3" LETTERS OR BIGGER SHALL READ: "IN CASE OF FIRE, OPEN VALVE." S. A REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR BACKFlOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE USED WHEN HIGH HAZARDS (AS DEFINED BY AWWA M-14) EXIST. TEMPORARY BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND FIRE PROTECTION METER TIE-IN ASSEMBLY NTS W-g REVISED: JULY 2011 1"1"---'['-7,--' L___J : ,.1 ) " 2' TAP ("TYPICAL OF lWO) / 2" CURB STOP --.// 0 (lYPICAL OF lWO) 2" BYPASS METER DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR BACK FLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY SUPPLIED WITH AMMONIA AND CHLORINE RESISTANT SEATS AND SILICONE RUBBER SEALS. Ul/FM APPROVED FOR FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY COUNlY ORDINANCE AND AWWA M-14. (SEE APPROVED BACKFLOW DEVICES, APPENDIX G) RISING STEM AND RESILIENT SEAT FLANGED GATE VALVE (lYP) INSTAlL IN LINE GATE VAlVE AT PROPERlY LINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 2" REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY, SUPPLIED WITH AMMONIA AND CHLORINE RESISTANT SEATS AND SILICONE RUBBER SEALS UL!FM APPROVED FOR FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE AND AWWA M-14. (SEE APPROVED BACKFLOW DEVICES, APPENDIX G) LOCK OS&Y VAlVE CLOSED 2" TAP (lYPICAL OF lWO) NOTES: VALVE SETTER (SEE COUNlY APPROVED PRODUCT LIST, APPENDIX F) 1. ALL ABOVE GROUND PIPE SHALL BE FLANGED END DUCTILE IRON PIPE, PRESSURE CLASS 350. ALL NUTS AND BOLTS SHAL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 2. WATER MAIN EXTENSION AND ASSEMBLY IS REQUIRED TO BE FLUSHED, CHLORINATED AND GIVEN BACTERIAL CLEARANCE BY THE WATER DEPARTMENT LAB BEFORE PLACEMENT IN SERVICE. 3. BACKFLOW UNIT AND METER REQUIRES INITiAl CERTIFICATION FOR OPERATION AND ACCURACY WITH RESULTS AND ANNUAL TESTS SUBMITTED TO THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER DEPARTMENT. 4. INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR SYSTEM TIE-IN AND ASSEMBLY CONNECTION. 5. THIS ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PAINTED WITH RED EPOXY PAINT. 6. ALL COMPONENTS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH DRINKING WATER SHALL CONFORM TO NSF STANDARD 61. 7. A 4'XS' SIGN WITH 3" LETTERS OR BIGGER SHALL READ: "IN CASE OF FIRE, OPEN VALVE." 8. A REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR BACK FLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE USED WHEN HIGH HAZARDS (AS DEFINED BY AWWA M-14) EXIST. ALTERNATE TEMPORARY BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND W-9A FIRE PROTECTION METER TIE-IN ASSEMBLY NTS REVISED: JULY 2011 ~INSTALL INLlNE GATE VALVE AT PROPERTY LINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE t ~. . ~O, I CONCRETE FOUNDATION (TYP) FULL LENGTH OF METER ASSEMBLY; 4' WIDE, 6" THICK REINFORCED 6 X 6 10/10 WELDED WIRE MESH FIRE PROTECTION METER (SEE COUNTY APPROVED PRODUCT LIST, APPENDIX F) WITH BYPASS. UL/FM APPROVED FOR FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION (FACTORY ASSEMBLED) (WITH TOP ACCESS FACTORY APPLIED FUSION BONDED EPOXY COATED STRAINER ONLY) AIR RELEASE VALVE (SEE COUNTY APPROVED PRODUCT LIST, APPENDIX F) BRASS NIPPLE 12" SPOOL PIECE NSTALL IN LINE GATE VALVE AT PROPERlY LINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE MAIN SIZE PER UTILITY PlAN MJ 45' OR 90' BEND WITH MJ RETAINER GLANDS (TYP) NOTES: MAIN SIZE PER UTILITY PLAN 1. ALL ABOVE GROUND PIPE WILL HAV SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 2. (4) VEHICULAR GUARD POST DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED F R. CONFIGURATION TO BE ILLUSTRATED ON CONSTRUCTION 3. TIES REQUIRING CONTINUOUS WATER SERVICE MAY WISH TO INSTALL S. (SEE W-15) 4. PROPERTY OWNER, STARTING FROM THE FIRST ISOLATION VALVE PRIOR 5. OF THE MATERIAL UP TO AND PRIOR TO VALVE ON THE ASSEMBLY FROM THE COUNTY'S 6. AL CERTIFICATION BY AN APPROVED CERTIFIED TESTER WITH RESULTS AND ANNUAL TEST COUNTY WATER DEPARTMENT. 7. ALL PLANTINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1.5' FROM THE EDGE OF SLAB, AND SHALL PROVIDE A 3' ACCESS OPENING. 8. THIS ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PAINTED WITH RED EPOXY PAINT. 9. ALL COMPONENTS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH DRINKING WATER SHALL CONFORM TO NSF STANDARD 61. 10. REFER TO APPROPRIATE SPECIFICATION IN MANUAL FOR GATE VALVES AND APPURTENANCES. FIRE SYSTEM ASSEMBLY DETAIL NTS W-10 REVISED: JANUARY 2009 o::l~ O:J W>-, ~I~ ~II wI9 11.1- OX g:1~ I I AIR VALVE WITH CORPORATION STOP (SEE COUNTY APPROVED PRODUCT LIST, APPENDIX F) CONCRETE FOUNDATION (TYP) FULL LENGTH OF METER ASSEMBLY; 4' WIDE, 6" THICK REINFORCED 6 x 6 10/10 WELDED WIRE MESH ~INSTALL INLlNE GATE VALVE AT PROPERTY LINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE O' .: . AIR VALVE WITH CORPORATION STOP (SEE COUNTY APPROVED PRODUCT LIST, APPENDIX F) DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR BACK FLOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY SUPPLIED WITH AMMONIA AND CHLORINE RESISTANT SEATS AND SILICONE RUBBER SEALS. UL/FM APPROVED FOR FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY COUNTY ORDINANCE AND AWWA M-14. (SEE APPROVED BACKFLOW DEVICES, APPENDIX G) (FlANGED GATE VALVE WITH RISING STEM AND RESILENT SEAT (TYP) 12" SPOOL PIECE INSTALL INLlNE GATE VALVE AT PROPERTY LINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE :.' ... . , . ~. '. ,...... MAIN SIZE PER UTILITY PLAN ADJUSTABLE ST~NLESS STEEL PIPE SUPPORT STANDS AS REQUIRED ANCHORED TO PAD (TYP) MJ 45 OR 90 DEGREE BEND WITH MJ RETAINING GlANDS (TYP) MAIN SIZE PER UTILITY PlAN NOTES: 1. ALL ABOVE GROUND PIPE WILL HAVE FLANGED END DUCTILE IRON PIPE, PRESSURE CLASS 350. ALL NUTS AND BOLTS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. 2. (4) VEHICULAR GUARD POSTS TO BE INSTALLED AROUND ASSEMBLY. CONFIGURATION TO BE ILLUSTRATED ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. 3. AS THIS UNIT WILL REQUIRE PERIODIC TESTING, FACILITIES REQUIRING CONTINUOUS WATER SERVICE MAY WISH TO INSTALL PARALLEL UNITS TO PREVENT SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS. 4. ASSEMBLY WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY PROPERlY OWNER, STARTING AFTER THE INLlNE GATE VALVE AT THE PROPERlY LINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. 5. COUNTY WILL REQUIRE DEDICATION OF MATERIAL UP TO AND INCLUDING THE INLlNE GATE VALVE FROM THE FROM THE COUNTY'S WATER MAIN. 6. BACKFLOW DEVICE REQUIRES INITIAL CERTIFICATION BY AN APPROVED CERTIFIED TESTER WITH RESULTS AND ANNUAL TEST RESULTS SUBMITTED TO THE COUNlY WATER DEPARTMENT. 7. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1.5' FROM THE EDGE OF SLAB, AND SHALL PROVIDE A 3' ACCESS OPENING. 8. THIS ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PAINTED WITH RED EPOXY PAINT. 9. ALL COMPONENTS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH DRINKING WATER SHALL CONFORM TO NSF STANDARD 61. 10. A REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE USED WHEN HIGH HAZARDS (AS DEFINED BY AWWA M-14) EXIST. 4" AND LARGER FIRE SYSTEM DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY DETAIL NTS W-11 REVISED: JULY 2011 FLANGED GATE VALVE~ WITH RISING STEM AND RESILIENT SEAT (TYP) DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR BACKFlOW PREVENTER ASSEMBLY SUPPLIED WITH AMMONIA AND CHLORINE RESISTANT SEATS AND SILICONE RUBBER SEALS. UL/FM APPROVED FOR FIRE SERVICE INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED BY COUNlY ORDINANCE AND AWWA M-14. (SEE APPROVED BACK FLOW DEVICES, APPENDIX G) VEHICULAR GUARD POST (TYP)~ 0::1~ ol:J ~I~ :J~ I ~I~ UJII @Sl~ o::s:! Q..o:: I I INSTALL INLlNE GATE VALVE AT PROPERTY LINE OR RIGHT -OF-WAY LINE 9 lJ.. NOTES: 1. AlL ABOVE GROUND PIPE WILL HAVE FLANGED END DUCTILE IRON PIPE, PRESSURE CLASS 350. ALL NUTS AND BOLTS SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL. VALVE SETTER (SEE COUNTY APPROVED PRODUCT LIST, APPENDIX F) .. . . 4' .:: .. .. 4' . . .. CONCRETE FOUNDATION (TYP) 4' WIDE x 5' LONG, 6* THICK; REINFORCED 6 x 6 10/10 WELDED WIRE MESH 2. (4) VEHICULAR GUARD POSTS TO BE INSTALLED AROUND ASSEMBLY. CONFIGURATION TO BE ILLUSTRATED ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAl. 3. AS THIS UNIT WILL REQUIRE PERIODIC TESTING, FACILITIES REQUIRING CONTINUOUS WATER SERVICE MAY WISH TO INSTAlL PARALLEL UNITS TO PREVENT SERVICE INTERRUPTIONS. 4. ASSEMBLY WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNER, STARTING AFTER THE INLlNE GATE VALVE AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE. 5. COUNTY WILL REQUIRE DEDICATION OF MATERIAL UP TO AND INCLUDING THE INLlNE GATE VALVE FROM THE COUNlY'S WATER MAIN. 6. BACKFLOW DEVICE REQUIRES INITiAl CERTIFICATION BY AN APPROVED CERTIFIED TESTER WITH RESULTS AND ANNUAL TEST RESULTS SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY WATER DEPARTMENT. 7. ALL PLANTING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1.5' FROM THE EDGE OF SLAB, AND SHALL PROVIDE A 3' ACCESS OPENING. 8. THIS ASSEMBLY SHALL BE PAINTED WITH RED EPOXY PAINT. 9. ALL COMPONENTS THAT COME INTO CONTACT WITH DRINKING WATER SHALL CONFORM TO NSF STANDARD 61. 10. A REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY SHALL BE USED WHEN HIGH HAZARDS (AS DEFINED BY AWWA M-14) EXIST. 4" THROUGH 10" ONLY COMPACT FIRE SYSTEM DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY DETAIL NTS W-11 A REVISED: JULY 2011 >'~lk: ....: ~ z ~ ffiVl~ v W ~ ~ i3~0 18' w~ lk:i! W ~ 0 N:J ~~ ~ :::Ii ' ,..., 0 ~~~VI:::Ii~ -~ ~ lk: J: O>-W~ lift> VI::l ~~ ~ ::l VI ~lDlk:~ 0<<0 ~lk:S :::Ii W ~OG:~ :J~ lk:-lk: ~Z VI ::l Z ~ O:::li VI [1. W ~:r[1. Olk: ~ 0 WwVI t>z ~W[1.~<[1. ~~ 0 u Ii:' ___>-WW ~oCi zlk:<1= ~ ~ ~ t ~,-,Ulk: Vl5 ::>0 ~~~~~vi ~~ ~ lDlk:- lk:wO~ 01= :::IiO~ ~~ ~~ ~ ::l ~lDg:G: lk: ~ .......WU.O [1.l5~~w~ VI ~ ZVl~w 5g~~ 0 Q~~9 o~ ~~ .~~~ O::l VI ~ lk: [1. ~o !;(lk: .. ~ ~~ u. z ~ 0 Zlk:lk:O ~~~:Z~~ OU 0 ~ o lI:: :ii:~ww Ow lk: ~ ~~~o :::Ii Wlk: lk: lk:u [1.W ~ z- ~ [1.~ U$VI~O~ ~j!: <.:> O:::liJ:~ W~_::> W <.:> u. ~, lk: ~8 ~wS' ai~ffi~~lI:: lD Z u.' 0 ~ ~~ 52 ~OlD~ G:OWlk: ~VlZ W:::IilD U ci lk:~lDl-'::>ai z wO ~ z w' 0 ::l ::lVlO >- ~ lk:~QlD , ::>lk:lk: ~ lk:~UO 0 ~~~ )( 00 OG:w ~E~w>-~ J: 0 U Z ~ U 8~io~ wlk:~ [1.~oUlD i ~ lk: w~ oo~~og: , ~ ~OVl ~~Vi~~~ 0 [1. oo:::li VI~VI ::l[1. ::l W lk:OVl 0[1.0~ol::l Wlk:~ 0 Gj[1.U ~i7l~G:~e W (/)~ 0 :::Ii~< Z 0 ~ z~~ lD W o ~ I >-1- e~j!: W z :::Ii 0 ....JW ~::l_ <W <.:> 0 Vi m~ o ~ [1. z U ~ ~ lk: ........ wO a: o..C"S lDVI a: ~ ~ WI: (/)00 ~~~ ~~ 0 (/)....J G:OlD z I!? <0 ::l <(<( Z:::li VI~ 0 ::l ;tWW aJo [1. VI <.:>- lk: ~ ~::> 5~~ zl') <.:> ~~ wC ~< ~8 VI I- SW olk: ~~ lk: W ~~ W ~~ [1.0 UVI z 5 ~ ....J<( ~~ ~~ VI <(~ -i II'i '" ,..: cO ::>w C~ I!? 0: wG: z z Ww ()~ 0 .W lk: lk::::Ii Zz >'0 -W ~::l ~:J ~ ~lD :::Iig ~~ W g~ 0 (/)~ 0 ffiffi Zz La.J [1.[1. W> OVl ::lo 00 OVl o~ lk:lk: 9:0 aJ~ ~g [1.[1. l.&.. 0 0 o~ >-w ::I: OlD ~~ . lD~ I- W ~~ 8'< ~ ~I!? z ~z~ ~~ ::> woo ~ ~~ ~~ ~ lDOg: ~~~ ~8 ~ b1i;w'P ::l ~ lk:~ io I!?::lo o~ ~8~~ It) ~::l~ >lk: wI') W:J . ~ow !l:VI [1.- ZZW ~~oo ow~ ~-z ~wz Vl5 8~ ~S Ow:J Z:J ffiwo~ !?(lD~ w:J>, <.:>lDlk:G: WI zu ~~lk: wj!:>, z~~ lk: [1. w[1.':i; ::lw...i lD ~ :5g~~ zO W Olk:W 5zlk: ::llk:1 :Jlk:1 :Jg:Qz ~:ru. lk:::l~ o~ -!;:u. ~oo Zlk:lk:O Z lk::J <':>VIVI ::l~ ~<9 ~~l::l~ -,"", ~~VI lk:1 <lk:>- U 0 ~<.:>~ ~[1.~ z- ~~o~ Olk:VI -::l~ lDzJ: w~_::l ~[1.~ J:<.:> i3~~ ~'<~ lk: ~8 ~:a!WI il -z ~G::::Ii G:OWlk: ~>~l5 ~~~ ZlD ~~l5 ""'O::l [1. VI .:!:.U(/] 3Nn A"IM .:lO-lHDI~ ~o 3Nn Al~3dO~d ..: N ..; W-15 REVISED: JANUARY 2009 w w........ w . ~ 0 0::01- ~ w5~ O~~~ w~ w 0 t;JlEl!: o::~ 0:: :I: ~~~-~ a. I- ::l ~ ~a.~ N~ ::E -I- ~a. ~ :I: ~ O::E 00 lIl~W~O VI:::l 0:: e" I-W ~~VlO~ ~0::5 ~~ ft :i: ........>-Ww bo::O:: ~:..Juo:: ~VI~~~ ~ltQ. 00:: VI Z Z ........ ~~i ~wG: 0 w ~~ 0 u w ~ I-G:z::.: :I: """'wLL.o ~~~ 0::~0::5~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ZVI~w :I:~o ~l;;oU ~~~g W ~ 0 Iii I-ww z_LL. u~ :I: w ~O:::ii~ ffi~~ ~~o~~ VI VI 0 0:: OZ VI :::l a. ~~~o e" 0 ~ 0:: ~o ~8 0:: 0 50w a.w ow 0:: LL. ~ w O::E~~ wO:: ~ Z 0::0:: a. 0 1Il ~ I.i. ....... z!:::!~ ~~~~~ 0:: ~ ...J LL.' 0 0 a.w w ~ e" ~o\O~ VlO ~~ g e" <wit ~:I:~~W ...: Z o::~ ~'\O ::E1Il w ~::? w Z so: VI ~ UU ~ < ~~i )( wow ~oJ~""'" w Z ~ ~ Q. oc 0::1-0:: ~o o ~ <0 '\0 G:.......G: ~:::lz"'" ~ 0 1Il 0:: .o'j ...J 0:: z~ ~ W W ::E 0 E ::?~~~::E"""" ~VllIl~ 0::E 0 a. VI Uo e" VI<(~ ~~ ff: w ~ ~o 0:: ~::EVI:a!i~ VlVIZVI 0 I- o ~ ~ I- ~la o~ffi~<!@ VlO::EO G: w U OX V)li ~~:::ll- ~!3 0:: ~ Itw co ::':~1Il- w t3-~:i~~ ZI-'::Eo LL. ~ Z ::.:........ >-..... <Vlzw W:::l 0 0 u"'" ....J - UVI i U :I:~o::o l;;li::2~ w ~'j CJ)..J uf3W~ ~o:: ::E ::? ~CJ) ~~ .13 :::l 0 ::E ~::Jz ~a.o~ -Iii ::E ~ ~ 0::<( .....~ 1Ila.0 ~~ Z Z ::?~ V)..... :::la.ul;; l;;~~ :2 ~ w ~< V) V) O:::ldz :::lw:::l.o VI...J ::E ct~ OVl VI_ w<( <( 0 ~!l::S ~:::l w U o~ a. 0:: II :::lZ w 1Il Oz lIlo ~ Wo ~~ e" ~ u~ ~<( ~~ O::w :::lz .....00 0 ~6 ~~ VI ~;o ::I:..J ~!3 VI~ ~ Zo ~o U<( e"VI 1Il ~~ a. VI ::> ZVl ::E f3~ ~ C ~:::l ~e 00 w ~~ 0 z ~~ VI UVI ~ ~ :::lo 0 a.<( UVI 00:: U ....J w i= Q~ ...J;" VI ~~ ..... <( U ...JLL. o::~ U ~i ...J :i: ...JVI ~1- <(<( I- <(z <(:I: .......... ~o ..... Cc ::E~ V) Lri .0 r.: cD en 0 ~~ ..Jz VI...J ~ ~~ Z ct- lIlZ Ww ::::>ct 0 ::EW ~~ ~w Zz 0:: Cl~ w::E ~::J o~ o~ ~ ~1Il VI:::l "'"0 Zo :I: ~g ~~ ~~ ..... ..... ;:,.~ 00:: ~""""5 G~ 00 u ~ 1Ila. ffiffi o.!fl 0 ~~ ~ o ~ a. 5V1 Zz a. a. I-~ :> l.&.. :::lo 00 ~ iii~ S ~ ffi"""'~ !@!3 01= 0::0:: Q.Z .....:: ~u a. a. :::l:::l ~....... VI 0 1Il VI ::J :::l 0 V)O o U .~I= Wo 00:: >-w ~u o~lz""""w o :::l 01Il ~~ 1Il~ ..... Ol Wo o::W ~::J ;j~e~ 0:: e" ffi e,,~ f3~ W:I: ~ a::: 1-1- i:: ..... ~...J ~~ Q.~ 00:: Q. ~~ Z ~::E > >-:::l O:::a! ::? !@ 0 in ~ ~ ~Z..J ~~ 0 0 0 0:: s:- 0 > VI w ~ffi "'"< - W:::l WO~ ~~ ~ff: w ..., t;J VI >Z 1Il00 NW O:..J Z a. ~1Il ~~ ~::l wO:: ~~ ~iiiO>- G~ <(~ ~~ ~1-00~ ::Eo:: Z Ol-a. ~8 51I1 ~ ::E~I= .Ez ~V < ::l< I-~~ ~~ ~ woo 0:: ~ ~ Iii ~VI ~~..yO ::E 1Il0::W io ~VlO 0:: OQ.~ ~~VlOO::JWO ~ O~ ~8 ~~e,,~&:l-g~ It') O~Z >0:: ~C::?5 wI") a.-<( W::J . wow 50:: wp Q.X U Zz Ou !l::VI o~~ ZzW 00 <( iii:5 U:::l~::': ~5 ~-z Ww 8wz ~ffiO:: ~ liiffi Q.oOCLL.:I:8wg ~o~ Ow::J ~z ~~ z ~~ ~ ~~~ :::l::J za. ow !::o:: o::u zu Oz ~~~ ~~~lto o~ c!;( ~a. ~w :::lw..J e,,1-0:: ...JO::~ w- oo::w 5zo:: O::w ~~ 0::8 ~o VIe" O:::::l~ ...Jwl 2!0:: I w www w ~ W:::l e"VI oft i~9 ::l~ -ltLL.O::b>-O::O:: ola ~~ :a! 0 o::~ ~~VI :::l~ ie" ::l09 G:_1IlG:G: Q....J ~ > 0:: a. U 0 ~e,,1- <(0::1- 0::1- o 0:: a. 0:: VI -:::lW lIlz:I: ~~ l;;a.~ lb < ~ ~a.~ :I:e,,!:: ou ~G:::E ::EI=~ U:::l i .z w~o:: Z:::l . ~~i2 0 ~~~ ZlIl ~l;;15 :::l...JZ ~o 3NIl )"VM-.:lO-1H~I~ ........O:::l 8~~ _0:: .!..UV) ~a. - -~O 3NIl Af~fdO~d -- WO ...: N ,,; -i ~~ ~o:: >- W-16 >~ ::lw wo..!.~ 0::Q. ~z~~ ~W:I:IW <~ ~~~~~g:~~~~ REVISED: JULY 2011 Approved Backflow Devices VENDOR SIZE MODEL NO. TYPE USE Ames 1 Watts 3/4" - 2" 400B 1919 RP Residential or commercial potable water locations Watts 3/4" - 2" 909-009 Series RP Residential or commercial potable water locations Wilkins 3/4" - 2" 975 RP Residential or commercial potable water locations Ames / Watts 2.5" - 10" C-400 /957 RP Large size meter - potable water for commercial or residential applications Watts 2.5" - 10" 909 RP Large size meter - potable water for commercial or residential applications Wilkins 2.5" - 10" 375 RP Large size meter - potable water for commercial or residential applications Ames 3/4" - 2" 4000B-LBV RP Combo services: fire and domestic 4000B-FP lines Watts 3/4" - 2" 009LF RP Combo services: fire and domestic lines Wilkins 3/4" - 2" 975XL (w/OS&Y only) RP Combo services: fire and domestic lines Ames Colt 2.5" - 10" C-400 (w/OS&Y only) RP Combo services: fire and domestic lines Watts 2.5" - 10" 909 (w/OS& Y only) RP Combo services: fire and domestic lines Wilkins 2.5" - 10" 375 RP Combo services: fire and domestic lines Ames Fire Lines - Standard 2" 3000B DCDA Watts Fire Lines - Standard 2" - 3" 007 DCDA Wilkins Fire Lines - Standard 2" 950XL TDAF DCDA Ames Fire Lines - Standard 2.5" - 10" C300/M300 DCDA Watts Fire Lines - Standard 3" -10" 709 DCDA Wilkins Fire Lines - Standard 2.5" - 12" 350 DCDA Wilkins Fire Lines - Standard 4" - 10" 450 (N-Shape) DCDA Note: All fire line Backflow Devices shall be UL or FM approved for fire service installation. Above is a small list, others may be used if requirements are met and information is provided Appendix G Rev. 07/2011 ~ COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION New Permitting Proced.ures For AC change outs 6/1/10 1. When replacing HVAC equipment in one unit of a multi-family building three stories or less in height, the new equipment must meet all of the origina'l fire ratings. This aDDlies onlv to the new Droducts Installed. 2. When replacing HVAC equipment in one unit of a multi-family building over three stories in height, the new equipment must meet all ofthe new fire ratings. i.e. CPVC or plenum rated drains, plenum rated arm flex, and plenum rated wiring. this aDDlles onlv to the new Droducts installed. 3. Whenever a new line set is installed and runs through a fire rated assembly in any multi-family building, the proper fire rated protection must be used at penetration. A structural inspection will be required whenever a new line is installed or fire rated assembly is penetrated. A $60.00 fee will be charged for this inspection. More information will be required at time of permitting. a) The number of floors of building. b) Will a new line set be installed? c) What type of protection system will be used to achieve the proper fire rating? d) The approximate date of construction of building. e) Provide the rated CFM of the equipment as per manufacture as well as tonnages. f) And the standard information supplied already by contractor Any AC system installed in a commercial application, I.e. strip stores, office buildings, theater or many others, and any AC system 2000CFM or greater in a multi-family residential dwelling will require a review by Fire Plan Review for automatic shut down, smoke detector location and all other applicable codes. You may contact any of the people below for more information. Bob Garee Jim Turner Dick Noonan Bob Salvaggio Ed Ri ley (239) 252-2439 (239) 252-2491 (239) 252-2439 (239) 252-3473 (239)252-3473 m51l7/10 ., I ! AIC CHANGE OUT CHECKLIST Any AlC system installed in a commercial application, i.e. mercantile occupancy, business occupancy, storage occupancy, multi-family (3 units or more) etc., will require a Mechanical and Fire Plan review and inspection. Any AIC change out in a multi-family residential dwelllnR unit that has a capacity of greater than 2000 cfm per the manufacturer specification sheets will require a Fire Plan Review and Fire Inspection for automatic shut down, smoke detector location and all other applicable codes in accordance with NFPA 90A andlor 90B, 2002 ed. The following checklist is designed to help facilitate a fast and accurate review to the minimum codes established in Florida. The contact Information requested below is to expedite an approval process If Information Is missing or further clarification Is needed. Applicant Intlke Minimum information required at time of permitting: o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o a) Email address, fax number, phone number. b) The approximate date of construction of building. o c) The number of floors of building. o d) Which floor is this unit located on. o e) The square footage of the unit. o o f) The average height of the ceiling. g) Will a new line set be installed? Yes D NoD o h) What type of protection system will be used to achieve the proper fire rating? Floor/ceiling D Fire rated wall D o i) Details provided of the penetration protection. Yes D No D o j) Provide the rated CFM of the equipment per the manufacturer specification sheets as well as tonnages. Provided D Not Provided D k) Is the location of the A/e unit in a plenum rated closet. Yes 0 No D o o I) Standard information supplied by contractor. Provided D Not Provided D m) Submit three (3) sets of plans. Provided D Not Provided D o