Backup Documents 06/16/2011 B
BCC
BUDGET
WORKSHOP
MEETING
BACKUP
DOCUMENTS
JUNE 16, 2011
COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FY 2012 BUDGET WORKSHOP SCHEDULE
AGENDA
Thursday, June 16,2011
9:00 A.M.
9:00 a.m.
General Overview - Presented
Courts and Related Agencies (State Attorney & Public Defender) Presented
Growth Management - Presented
Public Services - Presented
Administrative Services - Presented
Public Utilities - Presented
Debt Service - Presented
Management Offices (Pelican Bay) - Presented
County Attorney - Presented
BCC (Community Redevelopment Agencies, Airport) - Presented
1 :00 p.m.
Constitutional Officers
Elections - Presented
Clerk of Courts - Presented
Sheriff - Presented
Other Constitutional Officers requesting to address the BCC - None
Public Comment:
Debbie Ramirez
Rod Landham
Louis Mahonboy
Guiermo Pena
Adjourned
- Approved 5/0
Page 1
June 16, 2011
~~~
~
CHAPTER 62B-36 BEACH MANAGEMENT FUNDING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
62B-36.00 1
62B-36.002
62B-36.003
62B-36.004
62B-36.005
62B-36.006
62B-36.007
62B-36.008
62B-36.009
62B-36.010
62B-36.0 11
Purpose.
Definitions.
Policy.
Project Eligibility. (Repealed)
Annual Funding Requests.
Project Ranking Procedure.
Project Cost Sharing.
Criteria for Evaluating Project Applications. (Repealed)
Project Agreements.
Disbursement of Program Funds. (Repealed)
Post Completion Project Review. (Repealed)
62B-36.001 Purpose.
The Beach Management Program works in concert with eligible governmental entities to achieve protection, preservation and
restoration of the sandy beaches fronting the Atlantic Ocean, the Gulf of Mexico and the Straits of Florida. The Department may
enter into a cost sharing agreement with eligible governmental entities for the implementation of beach management projects. This
rule establishes funding request procedures, project ranking, cost sharing procedures and project agreement requirements pursuant
to Sections 161.088, 161.091, 161.101 and 161.161, F.S.
SpecijicAuthority 161.101,161.161 FS. Law Implemented 161.088,161.091,161.101,161.161 FS. History-New 6-10-83, Formerly 16B-36.01,
16B-36.001, Amended 12-25-03.
62B-36.002 Definitions.
(1) "Annual Funding Request and Local Long Range Budget Plan" is the document submitted by the eligible governmental
entity which includes a detailed description for the next fiscal year's funding request and a schedule for the disbursement of funds
to be requested for beach management projects or related activities over a given period of time.
(2) "Beach Management" is protecting, maintaining, preserving, or enhancing Florida's beaches including but not limited to,
restoring or nourishing beach and dune systems, dune protection and restoration activities, restoration of natural shoreline
processes, inlet management activities to facilitate sand bypassing, construction of erosion control structures, supporting
engineering and environmental studies, project monitoring, mitigation, and removal of derelict structures and obstacles to natural
shoreline processes.
(3) "Contractual Services" are the provision of engineering, professional, or scientific services for eligible activities as
otherwise described in this chapter. Such activities may be performed by a private company or individual, or, if approved by the
Department, pursuant to subsection 62B-36.007(4), F.A.C., an eligible governmental entity.
(4) "Critically Eroded Shoreline" is a segment of shoreline where natural processes or human activities have caused, or
contributed to, erosion and recession ofthe beach and dune system to such a degree that upland development, recreational interests,
wildlife habitat or important cultural resources are threatened or lost. Critically eroded shoreline may also include adjacent
segments or gaps between identified critical erosion areas which, although they may be stable or slightly erosional now, their
inclusion is necessary for continuity of management of the coastal system or for the design integrity of adjacent beach management
projects.
(5) "Department" is the Department of Environmental Protection.
(6) "Eligible Governmental Entity" is any state, county, municipality, township, special district, or any other public agency
having authority and responsibility for preserving and protecting the beach and dune system.
(7) "Inlet" is a short narrow waterway including all related flood and ebb tidal shoals and the inlet shorelines, connecting a bay,
lagoon, or similar body of water with the Gulf of Mexico, the Straits of Florida, or the Atlantic Ocean. Improved, altered or
modified inlets are those where stabilizing rigid coastal structures have been constructed, or where inlet related structures or
features such as channels have been constructed or are actively maintained and the channel depth is greater than the inlet system
would support in a natural state.
(8) "Project Agreement" is a contract executed between the Department and the eligible governmental entity that explicitly
defines the terms and conditions under which the project shall be conducted.
(9) "Project Boundary" means the shoreline of the beach management project and the first row of development immediately
landward ofthe beach vegetation line or beach erosion control line, whichever is further landward.
(10) "Project Phase" is a logical step required in developing and implementing a project. A typical project will normally
include the following phases:
(a) "Feasibility" - is the characterization of the erosion problem and constraints on remediation alternatives, development and
analysis of alternatives to address the problem, and selection of the cost-effective, environmentally sound alternative that avoids or
minimizes adverse impacts.
- 1
~ ~ L.S 1'~c:.l.4..~SIO"," ~A ~
11-t.e.eSS
Agenda Item # -=- Meeting Date ,,1t"111
Presented By: bOf')r-~~ \~ \\-er
(b) "Design and Permitting" - is the development of plans, specifications, permit applications and final costs for the project.
(c) "Construction" - is the execution of the selected project.
(d) "Monitoring" - is the collection of project performance, biological and environmental data.
~ t (11) "Public Beach Access" is an entry zone adjacent to a sandy beach under public ownership or control which is specifically
used for providing access to the beach for the general public. The access must be signed, maintained and clearly visible from the
~ adjacent roadway. The types of public beach access sites are:
Jf'w (a) "Primary Beach Access" is a site with at least 100 public parking spaces and public restrooms.
(b) "Secondary Beach Access" is a site that may have parking and amenities, but does not qualify as a primary beach access.
(12) "Public Lodging Establishment" is any public lodging establishment currently licensed by the Department of Business
and Professional Regulation in the classification of "hotel", "motel" and "resort condominium" with six or more units and fronting
directly on the sandy beach.
(13) "Statewide Long Range Budget Plan" is the planning document used by the Department to schedule the disbursement of
funds over a given period of time. It is developed in coordination with eligible governmental entities based on the Strategic Beach
Management Plan and Local Long Range Budget Plans.
(14) "Strategic Beach Management Plan" is the Department's adopted plan for management of the critically eroded shoreline
of the state and the related coastal system.
Specific Authority 161.101, 161.161 FS. Law Implemented 161.088, 161.091, 161.101, 161.161 FS. History-New 6-10-83, Formerly 16B-36.02,
16B-36.002, Amended 12-25-03.
62B-36.003 Policy.
(1) The Beach Management Program is established to develop and execute a comprehensive, long range, statewide beach
management plan for erosion control, beach preservation, restoration, nourishment and storm protection for the critically eroded
shoreline of the State of Florida. This comprehensive program includes the Strategic Beach Management Plan, the Critical Erosion
Report, shoreline change reports, inlet management studies, state and federal feasibility and design studies, the Statewide Long
Range Budget Plan, and other reports as the Department may find necessary for a multiyear maintenance and repair strategy. The
comprehensive program is implemented through projects consistent with the Strategic Beach Management Plan and included in the
Statewide Long Range Budget Plan.
(2) The Department shall annually review available information and revise the designations of critically eroded shoreline in the
Critical Erosion Report. Eligible governmental entities shall be notified of any proposed changes and be given an opportunity to
submit additional information to justify or refute proposed revisions.
(3) Beach management projects funded by the Department shall be conducted in a manner that encourages cost-savings, fosters
regional coordination of projects, optimizes management of sediments and project performance, protects the environment, and
provides long-term solutions. Appropriate feasibility studies or analysis shall be required before design or construction of new
projects.
(4) Beach and dune restoration and nourishment projects funded by the Department shall be accessible to the general public
and access shall be maintained for the life of the project. Inlet sediment bypassing and the initial restoration of adjacent shorelines
impacted by improved, modified or altered inlets, do not have to provide for public access, except for when an Erosion Control
Line has been established. Shoreline segments shall be evaluated for public access as set forth in subsection 62B-36.007(1), F.A.C.
(5) Beach management projects will be evaluated on a case by case basis and may be cost shared, pursuant to Rules
62B-36.006 and 62B-36.007, F.A.C., when determined to avoid or minimize adverse impacts and be cost effective as demonstrated
by feasibility and design studies.
(6) Activities primarily related to navigation or other infrastructure improvements at inlets are, generally, not eligible for cost
sharing. However, components of projects which mitigate critically eroded shoreline caused by alterations, modifications or
improvements to inlets, implement components of the Strategic Beach Management Plan, and which do not increase impacts, are
eligible for cost sharing of up to 50% of the non-federal share for those components which:
(a) Are designed to minimize the erosive effects to the downdrift shoreline caused by the inlet by improving or facilitating the
efficiency of sand bypassing, such as the construction of sand bypassing facilities, sand traps and jetty alterations; or
(b) Cost effectively place beach quality sand on the adjacent eroded beaches, such as the incremental cost of placing sand on
the beach rather than in an offshore disposal area. The Department will cost share only in the incremental cost of placement of the
material, not mobilization and demobilization of equipment, design studies, or any other activity normal to the operation and
maintenance of the inlet.
(7) Eligible governmental entities are encouraged to consider existing inlet navigation maintenance activities as potential
sources of sand when developing beach restoration or nourishment projects.
(8) Beach management projects authorized by Congress for federal financial participation shall be cost shared up to 50% ofthe
non-federal share. Eligible governmental entities shall pursue federal appropriations to the maximum extent possible in order to
proportionally reduce state and local project costs. The Department will not cost share on the federal portion of an authorized
project unless an immediate threat to upland properties and financial loss is demonstrated.
- 2
(9) Upon notification from the Department of the 60-day submittal period, eligible governmental entities shall submit an
updated Annual Funding Request and Local Long Range Budget Plan. Annual funding shall only be requested for projects
expected to be initiated or continued in that fiscal year.
(10) The Department shall annually review and rank all projects requested by eligible governmental entities for the next fiscal
year, and maintain a current project listing in priority order. As part of the review, the Department shall seek formal input from
local coastal governments, beach and general government interest groups, and university experts. The project listing shall also
identify unranked projects and funds needed for statewide and regional management activities, state sponsored or co-sponsored
demonstration projects, new feasibility and design studies, and a consolidated category for project monitoring required by permit.
In determining the final project ranking, the Department shall consider likely available funding and include a primary and alternate
list of all projects. The primary list shall include those projects where legislatively appropriated funding is anticipated to be
adequate to fund the projects. The alternate list includes those projects where funding is not anticipated to be available. Funding
that may become available due to savings or scheduling changes shall be made available in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year to
projects in the following order:
(a) Projects on the primary list that require additional funds to complete the project phase.
(b) Previously funded projects that require additional funds to complete the project phase.
(c) Projects on the alternate list in priority order.
(d) Emergency situations as determined by the Department.
(11) The Department, in consultation with the eligible governmental entity, has the discretion, pursuant to Section
161.101(20), F.S., to revise funding for projects identified on the primary or alternate list ifit is determined by the Department that
the project is not ready to be initiated during the fiscal year. If the Department revises funding for a primary list project, at the
request of the eligible governmental entity, the project shall be included on the subsequent year's primary list, regardless of
prioritization pursuant to Rule 62B-36.006, F.A.C.
(12) Eligible governmental entities may design and construct beach management projects prior to the receipt of funding from
the state and may subsequently apply for reimbursement from the Department pursuant to the procedure in subsection
62B-36.009(3), F.A.C.
Specific Authority 161.101, 161.161 FS. Law Implemented 161.088, 161.091, 161.101, 161.161 FS. History-New 6-10-83, Formerly 16B-36.03,
Amended 4-27-86, Formerly 16B-36.003, Amended 12-25-03.
62B-36.005 Annual Funding Requests.
(1) Annual funding requests for cost sharing of projects shall be submitted by the eligible governmental entity to the
Department. Projects previously submitted, but not funded, and projects with cost overruns should be included. Eligible
governmental entities who have received funding for projects in past fiscal years and who anticipate requesting funding in
subsequent years shall update the Local Long Range Budget Plan as to costs and scheduling. The Local Long Range Budget Plan
shall be consistent with the Strategic Beach Management Plan and have a lO-year minimum time frame. The submittal shall be in
electronic format and include:
(a) A detailed project description, including project boundaries by Department range monuments, methods used in conducting
the project, and data or analysis to apply the ranking criteria required by Rule 62B-36.006, F.A.C.
(b) A map of the project area depicting the public beach access, the public parking within one quarter mile of each beach
access, public restroom facilities, the public lodging establishments, and comprehensive plan designations of commercial and
recreational facilities within the project boundary.
(c) Current license documentation on public lodging establishments within the project boundaries, including the number of
units available, if used to document public access.
(d) A current or updated resolution from the eligible governmental entity which includes statements of their support of the
project, willingness to serve as the local sponsor, and a statement of the extent of their ability and willingness to provide the
necessary local funding share to implement the project.
( e) A schedule of activities by project phase.
(f) The annual project cost estimates that indicate cost sharing by the eligible governmental entity, with sufficient supporting
detail depicting costs of project phases.
(2) The Department shall evaluate projects submitted to determine eligibility, project ranking and priority, and the extent of
cost sharing. Upon completion of the evaluation process, all eligible projects will be incorporated into the Department's Statewide
Long Range Budget Plan, which will be submitted to the Legislature along with the Department's legislative budget request
prioritizing projects according to the criteria in Rule 62B-36.006, F.A.C.
(3) Funding requests shall be evaluated and ranked on the basis of information provided by the eligible governmental entity,
except where such data is superseded by better quality information obtained by the Department. Failure to provide all required
information and documentation relating to eligibility and ranking criteria will result in the request being declared ineligible or
receiving reduced ranking points. Failure to provide accurate information will lead to termination of the project's eligibility for the
requested fiscal year.
- 3
Specific Authority 161.101,161.161 FS. Law Implemented 161.088,161.091,161.101,161.161 FS. History-New 6-10-83, Formerly 16B-36.05,
Amended 4-27-86, Formerly 16B-36.005, Amended 12-25-03.
62B-36.006 Project Ranking Procedure.
(1) Eligible projects requesting funding for the upcoming fiscal year will be ranked in priority for the Department's legislative
budget request. Projects previously ranked for a construction phase will retain their project score through the monitoring phase.
Eligible projects will be assigned a total point score by the Department based on the following criteria:
(a) Severity of erosion. The severity of erosion score is determined by the average rate of erosion for the project area over 30
years based upon the Department's long term data base for the project length at 2 points per foot of erosion, rounded to the nearest
whole foot, for a maximum total of 10 points.
(b) Threat to upland structures. The percent of developed property containing structures within the project boundaries at or
seaward of the projected 25-year return interval storm event erosion limit times ten, rounded to the nearest whole number, for a
maximum total of 10 points.
(c) Recreational and economic benefits. The percentage of linear footage of property within the project boundaries zoned
commercial or recreational, or the equivalent, in the current local government land use map times ten, rounded to the nearest whole
number, for a maximum total of 10 points.
(d) Availability offederal funds. Projects with Congressional authorization for the project phase shall receive 5 points. Projects
with a current Project Cooperation Agreement executed for the project phase or with available federal funds shall receive 5 points.
Maximum total for availability of federal funds is 10 points.
(e) Local sponsor financial and administrative commitment. Local governments who have a long term funding source
dedicated to the restoration and management of the beach project shall receive 3 points; those with staff dedicated for
administrative support shall receive 1 point; those with 75% or better compliance record for submitting quarterly reports and
billings correctly and on time over the previous year shall receive 1 point for a maximum total of 5 points.
(f) Previous state commitment. Projects where the Department has previously cost shared a feasibility or design phase shall
receive 1 point; projects to enhance, or increase the longevity of a previously constructed project shall receive 4 points; and projects
that will nourish a previously restored shoreline shall receive 5 points, for a maximum total of 10 points.
(g) Project performance. Performance points shall be based upon the expected life of a project, as documented in a feasibility
study or on the actual nourishment interval. Projects shall receive 1 point for every year of the expected life or actual life with a
maximum total of 10 points.
(h) Mitigation of inlet effects. Projects that implement strategies in the Strategic Beach Management Plan for sediment
bypassing or supplemental nourishment to adjacent beaches shall receive points based upon the percentage of the target bypass
volume to be achieved times 10 for a maximum total of 10 points.
(i) Innovative technologies. Projects to address erosion that are economically competitive and environmentally sensitive and
designed to demonstrate an innovative application of existing technologies shall receive 3 points; projects that demonstrate
technologies previously untried in the state shall receive 5 points for a maximum total of 5 points.
G) Enhance nesting sea turtle refuges. Projects that are adjacent or within designated nesting sea turtle refuges shall receive 5
points.
(k) Regionalization. Projects where two or more local governmental entities couple their projects for contracting to reduce
costs shall receive 5 points.
(I) Significance. Projects shall receive points based upon the project length at one point a mile, rounded to the nearest whole
number, for a total maximum of 10 points.
(m) In the event that more than one project receives the same number of points, the Department shall assign funding priority to
that project most ready to initiate construction.
Specific Authority 161.101,161.161 FS. Law Implemented 161.088,161.091,161.101,161.161 FS. History-New 6-10-83, Formerly 16B-36.06,
16B-36.006, Amended 12-25-03.
62B-36.007 Project Cost Sharing.
(1) Until the unmet demand for repairing Florida's beaches is satisfied, the Department intends to cost share equally the costs
with local governmental entities, except where actual cost savings from regional coordination can be demonstrated pursuant to
subsection 62B-36.007(2), F.A.C. The Department will cost share up to 50% of the non-federal share of projects subject to
adjustment for the level of public accessibility calculated using the following criteria:
(a) Primary beach access sites shall be granted eligibility for one-half mile in each shore-parallel direction from the access site
plus the shoreline length of the access site.
(b) Public lodging establishments shall be granted eligibility based upon the percentage of units available to the public,
rounded to the nearest 10%, times the property's beachfront footage.
( c) Secondary beach access sites shall be granted eligibility for the shoreline length of the access site. Additional eligibility
shall be granted for up to one-quarter mile in each shore parallel direction at a rate of 52.8 linear feet per parking space, provided:
1. Parking is located within one-quarter mile of the secondary beach access site; and
- 4
2. Parking is clearly signed or otherwise clearly designated as parking for the general public on an equal basis.
(d) Eligible shoreline lengths cannot overlap.
(e) The sum of the eligible shoreline lengths, as defined above, is divided by the total project length to determine the
percentage of the total project that is eligible for cost sharing.
(2) Cost savings, which occur due to the planned geographic coordination or sequencing of two or more projects between
eligible governmental entities, may qualify for additional reimbursement. Geographic sequencing means combining two projects
together for the purpose of construction contracting. In order to determine the increase in the state's cost share the projects shall be
bid jointly and separately to demonstrate the cost savings of combining the projects. The cost share shall be adjusted not to exceed
the state's maximum cost share amount of75 percent of the eligible costs.
(3) All costs of environmental and performance monitoring required by the Department's permit with the governmental entity
or a permit issued to the US Army Corps of Engineers, are eligible for cost sharing.
(4) The Department will cost share for private contractual services necessary to conduct the project. Services may be
contracted to a governmental entity if the Department is shown evidence that the entity's proposal is cost effective, of sufficient
professional quality, and otherwise in the general public interest. In determining whether contractual services are cost effective, the
Department shall consider cost estimates provided by the governmental entity from fully qualified private companies or
individuals. Specific contractual services performed by or for local governments shall be subject to specific accountability
measures and audit requirements and be consistent with the principles of Chapter 287, F.S., for competitive bidding and
opportunity.
Specific Authority 161.101, 161.161 FS. Law Implemented 161.088, 161.091, 161.101, 161.161 FS. History-New 6-10-83, Formerly 16B-36.07,
Amended 4-27-86, Formerly 16B-36.007, Amended 12-25-03.
62B-36.009 Project Agreements.
(1) The Department and the eligible governmental entity will execute a project agreement when funds are available and the
project is ready to proceed. The project agreement shall include the following:
(a) The estimated costs for each eligible project item, including the amount of the local sponsor's share, the Department's
share, and when applicable, the federal share;
(b) A scope of work and estimated date of completion for each eligible project item; and
(c) A periodic reporting and billing schedule.
(2) The Department's annual financial obligation under the agreement shall be contingent upon a legislative appropriation and
continued availability of funds. Funds not expended in a timely manner are subject to reversion to the General Revenue Fund.
(3) Eligible governmental entities may design and construct beach management projects which are consistent with this rule and
Chapter 161, F.S., prior to the receipt of funding from the state pursuant to Sections 161.101 and 161.161, F.S., and may
subsequently apply for reimbursement from the state within three years pursuant to Section 161.101, F.S., provided that:
(a) The eligible governmental entity and the Department have entered into a project agreement, which approves the project and
establishes the basis for reimbursement before the project phase commences. No reimbursement shall be granted for work
accomplished prior to the date of the agreement unless specifically set forth in the agreement;
(b) The project has been subject to review by the Department in the design and construction phases and the project has been
found to be consistent with the intent of Chapter 161, F.S., for project eligibility and cost effectiveness;
(c) Reimbursement shall be limited to eligible project costs as specified in the written agreement referenced in paragraph (a)
above and this rule;
(d) The project has been prioritized as required in Section 161.101(9), F.S., and is subject to legislative appropriation; and
(e) Complete documentation of all costs are provided to the Department, pursuant to the requirements of the State's Auditor
General.
Specific Authority 161.101, 161.161 FS. Law Implemented 161.088, 161.091,161.101, 161.161 FS. History-New 6-10-83, Formerly 16B-36.09,
16B-36.009, Amended 12-25-03.
- 5
Fwd: EDC SPENDS $4,999,572 IN ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS TO PROVIDE $1,927,... Page 1 of3
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 5:05 PM
To: bduane01 [bduane01@comcast.net]
Fwd: EDC SPENDS $4,999,572 IN ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS TO PROVIDE
$1,927,20SIN COMMITTED PROGRAM SERVICES
bduaneOl@comcast.net [bduaneOl@comcast.net] G 12 c vJ"l-l ,111 ~1i\J AW11tJt!i
Agenda Item #: Meeting Date:
0, ill)
Presented by: CCN.lt..,t5~ltI"":f:1Z h FAI,\): I\h
PRESS RELEASE
We have spent $4,999,572 to fund the administration [overhead] of the Economic
Development Council since 1998.
The Collier County Commission established the Job Creation Investment Program and
a Property Tax Stimulus Program in 2003. The "Incentive Toolbox" was expanded in
2005 by adding the Advanced Broadband Infrastructure Investment Program; and, in
2008, the Job Retention Investment Program. These all were followed by the creation
of an Innovation Zone Ordinance in 2010. Our commissioners decide who gets to
benefit from the programs.
Since 2003 the EDC has committed $1,927,208 to program services. They have
spent $2.59 IN ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS FOR EVERY DOLLAR COMMITTED TO
PROGRAM SERVICES. The total cost to fund the efforts, administrative costs plus
program services, is $6,926,780. This amounts to $47,444 in taxpayer funds for every
one of the 146 new jobs created by the programs.
Two of the stated commendable goals of the Economic Development Ordinance are
diversification and new, high paying job creation. We want to bring new industries into
Collier County that give us a broader, more diversified economic base. Some of the
program service expenditures don't seem to meet these stated goals.
It is difficult to see how the commitment of $148,999 to the Guadalupe Center in
Immokalee serves the goals of diversification and high paying jobs. The Guadalupe
Center is a worthwhile 501 C3 charity that serves Immokalee. They were given
$148,999 for expansion, job creation and fee payment assistance [impact fee
exemptions or credits]. The 25 jobs created were required to pay above $15,499 per
year for a taxpayer investment of $5,960 per job. This makes no sense unless the
goal of our County Commissioners is to give our tax dollars to charities that don't
create high paying jobs.
Anchor Health Centers was given a commitment of $452,131 for expansion, job
creation and broadband & fee assistance. Anchor was only required to create 10
jobs. They were expanding to meet the needs of the local market. They weren't about
to go somewhere else. They would have expanded with or without taxpayer
assistance.
13 years after the creation of the EDC and 10 years after the creation of incentive
programs our County Commissioners have expressed a desire to waive guidelines
and criteria for businesses that receive assistance. EDC President Tammie Nemecek
has asked that the County and EDC work together to "modify the programs to meet
the current needs of the business community and the goals of the county for job
https://mail.colliergov .net/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAACBw7h YJwxISLoTg... 6/16/2011
Fwd: EDC SPENDS $4,999,572 IN ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS TO PROVIDE $1,927,... Page 2 of3
creation" .
Are these the right people for the job?
Duane Billington
455-8579
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "GrimshawHeather" <HeatherGrimshaw@collieraov.net>
To: bduane01@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:37:24 AM
Subject: Billington6.12.11 prr
Good morning Mr. Billington. Please see the below information in response to your request. Thank
you.
HeCltViev CiVl.\l\A.-SVlClW
Citizen Liaison
Communication & Customer Relations
Collier County Government
239-252-8069
Economic Development Council (EDC) Funding History
Remittances-EDC Operations
Fiscal Cost Remittances to
Year Center EDC
FY98 001-0138710 235,002.00
FY99 001-0138710 259,396.00
FYOO 001-0138710 250,000.00
FY 01 001-0138710 391,472.00
FY02 001-0138710 342,837.00
FY03 001-0138760 399,695.00
FY04 001-0138760 400,000.00
FY05 001-0138760 400,000.00
FY06 001-0138760 400,000.00
FY07 001-0138760 400,000.00
FY08 001-0138760 400,000.00
FY09 001-0138760 400,000.00
FY 10 001-0138760 400,000.00
FY 11* 001-0138760 321,170.00
FY 12 001-0138760
FY 13
Total 4,999,572.00
https://mail.colliergov .net/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAACBw7h YJwxISLoT g... 6/16/2011
Fwd: EDC SPENDS $4,999,572 IN ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS TO PROVIDE $1,927,... Page 3 of3
*
Thru 6-3-11
From: bduaneO 1 (Ci)comcast. net r mailto: bduaneO 1 (Ci)comcast. netl
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 9:58 PM
To: OchsLeo; Dwight E. Brock; Crystal Kinzel
Subject: EDC OPERATIONS FUNDING BY COLliER COUNTY
Hi All
Please accept this as a public records request for the total amount the County has spent to fund the
EDC exclusive of incentives given to businesses.
Thank You
Duane Billington
455-8579
Under Florida Law. e-mail addresses are public records If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records
request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing.
<ActiveEconomicl ncentivePlans. pdf>
https://mail.colliergov.net/owa/?ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAACBw7h YJwxISLoTg... 6/16/2011
May 27, 2011
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST DEVELOPMENT
COUNCIL MEETING
Naples, Florida, May 27, 2011
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Tourist Development
Council in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein,
met on this date at 9:00 AM in a REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of
the Government Complex, Naples, Florida with the Following members
present:
Chairman: Commissioner Georgia Hiller
Vice Chairman: Murray H. Hendel
Susan Becker
Jerry Gibson
Clark Hill
Rick Medwedeff (Excused)
Robert Miller
Ed (Ski) Olesky
John Sorey III
ALSO PRESENT: Jack Wert, Tourism Director
Gary McAlpin, Coastal Zone Management Director
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney
Kelly Green, Tourist Tax Coordinator
, {)I..( r l ':,n, I C L.M ~ 1A~ tvf-
~""s~ d'.sC,..,c..c..~~,.","" . f
Agenda Item # Meeting Date. ~ y~{~!
\ .:... '.
Presented by. c:~~,O'd'!'et. ~ \\c....r
1
May 27,2011
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video
recording from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations Department or
view online.
1. Call to Order - Chairman Hiller
Commissioner Hiller called the meeting to order at 9:00 A.M.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
3. Roll Call
A quorum was established.
4. Changes and Approval of Agenda
Commissioner Hiller moved to approve the agenda subject to eliminating items 9a, b, d, e,
f, g and item 10 from the agenda (due to possible time constraints). Second by Mr. Hendel.
Carried unanimously 8 - O.
Commissioner Hiller moved to continue item 6.a until the next meeting. Second by Mr.
Olesky. Carried unanimously 8 - O.
5. Approval of TDC Minutes
a. Regular Meeting April 25, 2011
Mr. Sorey move to approve the minutes of the April 25, 2011 meeting subject to the
following change:
· Page 3, paragraph 1, line 1 from "for the new proposed AE zone." to "for the new
proposed AE zone, east of the Coastal Construction Setback Line. "
· Page 2- 3, paragraph 1, - elimination ofline 3 - ("This is a preserve area.")
Second by Mr. Hendel. Carried unanimously 8 - O.
6. Presentations / Public Comment - (10 min)
a. Rick Medwedeff Service Award
Continued.
7. New Business
The Council determined they would hear items d, e, and f before items a, band c.
d. FY 12 Proposed Tourism Department Budget
Jack Wert, Tourism Director presented the Executive Summary "Recommend approval
of Tourism Department & Museum Department Budgets for FY 12" dated May 27, 2011
for consideration.
Discussion occurred on the source of funding for operation of County Owned Museums.
2
May 27, 2011
Mr. Sorey moved to place on the record: the Tourist Development Council opposes
utilizing Tourist Tax Revenue to fund the operation of County Owned Museums.
Second by Mr. Hill.
Mr. Sorey amended the motion to place on the record: the Tourist Development
Council opposes utilizing Tourist Tax Revenue to fund the operation of County Owned
Museums. The Council recommends that the operation of County Owned Museums be
funded by the General Fund. (The Ordinance governing the Tourist Development
Council be modified as necessary to eliminate funding provisions and with said
funding phased out over a 3 year period). Second by Mr. Hendel. Carried
unanimously 8 - O.
Speaker
Ron Jamro, Director, Collier County Museums
The Council recommended Mr. Jamro provide a detailed analysis of County Owned
Museum funding (including operations and capital expenditures) for other Florida
Counties (as applicable) for their review.
Mr. Hendel moved to accept the (recommend the Board of County Commissioners
approve) FY12 Tourism Department and Museum Department Budgets. Second by
Mr. Sorey. Carried unanimously 8 - O.
Discussion occurred on whether the action included the budget be approved subject to the
removal of the County Museum Fund (Fund 198).
The motion was clarified.
Mr. Hill moved to (recommend the Board of County Commissioners) approve the FY12
Tourism Department Budget in the amount of$13,050,OOOfor allfunds with the
exception of Fund 198 (Category C-1 - County Owned Museums). If BCC approves
the Council's recommendation of eliminating Fund 198 from the budget, said funds be
made available to the TDC for expenditure. Second by Commissioner Hiller. Carried
unanimously 8 - o.
e. FY 12 TDC Category "C-2" Non-County Owned Museum Grant Requests
Jack Wert, Tourism Director provided the Executive Summary "Tourist Tax Category
C-2 Grant Application Review and Recommendationfor FY 12 totaling $280,000" dated
May 27,2011 for consideration.
The Council requested staffplace an item on afuture agendafor review of non-county
owned museum grant guidelines.
Mr. Hendel reported he is a past president of the Holocaust Museum of Southwest
Florida, Board of Directors and asked if he represents a conflict of interest on their
application.
3
May 27,2011
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney stated as past president, it is not necessary
for Mr. Hendel to recuse himself, however ifhe feels there is "an appearance of a
conflict" he may recuse himself.
Sveakers
Joel Kessler, Executive Director, Naples Art Association.
Joe Cox, Executive Director, Golisano Children's Museum of Naples.
Amy Snyder, Executive Director, Holocaust Museum of Southwest Florida.
Mr. Sorey left at 10:30 A.M
Robin DeMattia, Friends of Rookery Bay.
Brian Holley, Executive Director, Naples Botanical Garden.
Golisano Children's Museum of Navies
Commissioner Hiller moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners
approve the grant request for the Golisano Children's Museum of Naples in the
amount of $1 00,000. Second by Mr. Hendel. Carried unanimously 7 - o.
Holocaust Museum of Southwest Florida
Mr. Hill moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the Grant
Request for the Holocaust Museum of Southwest Florida in the amount of $30,000.
Second by Mr. Hendel. Carried unanimously 7 - O.
Navies Art Association. d.b.a. von Liebil! Art Center
Mr. Hendel moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the
grant requestfor the Naples Art Association, d.b.a. von Liebig Art Center in the
amount of $35,000. Second by Ms. Becker. Carried unanimously 7 - O.
Friends of Rookerv Bav
Discussion occurred on the legal structure/ownership of the Rookery Bay National
Estuarine Research Reserve and the Friends of Rookery Bay. Specifically, whether the
facility is a "Non-County Owned Museum" and if the Friends of Rookery Bay qualify as
grant recipient under the Ordinance.
Commissioner Hiller moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners deny
the grant request for the Friends of Rookery Bay.
Without a second, the motion was not considered.
Mr. Hendel moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the
grant requestfor the Friends of Rookery Bay in the amount of $40,000. Second by Ms.
Becker. Motion carried 5 'yes" - 2 "no." Commissioner Hiller and Mr. Miller voted
"no. "
4
May 27,2011
Naples Botanical Garden
Mr. Hill moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the grant
requestfor the Naples Botanical Garden in the amount of$75,000. Second by Mr.
Olesky. Carried unanimously 7 - o.
Break: 10:45 A.M
Reconvened: 10:55 A.M
f. FY 12 TDC Category "B" Marketing Grant Requests
Jack Wert presented the Executive Summary "Tourist Tax Category B Grant
Application Review and Recommendation for FY 12 totaling $60,000" dated May 27,
2011 for consideration.
Speakers
Elaine Hamilton, United Arts Council
Merlin Lickhalter, ArtsNaples World Festival
Shannon Franklin, Executive Director, Naples International Film Festival
United Arts Council
Discussion occurred noting previous actions by the Council recommended the United
Arts Council expenditure be included in the annual budget (not a grant award).
Mr. Wert noted the funds were not available within the budget so it has been presented
as a grant request.
Mr. Hendel movedfor the $15,000 proposed grantfor the United Arts Council be
placed in a grants fund reserve (contingency) or re-distributed to other applicants
requestingfunds within the grant category. Second by Ms. Becker. Motion carried 4
'yes" - 3 "no." Commissioner Hiller, Mr. Olesky and Mr. Gibson voted "no. "
Mr. Wert noted the process would be to reduce the fund allocation in the Category B
Grant Requests by $15,000 and these funds be made available for distribution to the
United Arts Council through the budget.
Colleen Greene, Assistant County Attorney noted she would need to review the issue
to see if transferring the funds is permitted.
Mr. Miller rescinded his affirmative vote on the motion.
The motionfailed 3 'yes" - 4 "no." Commissioner Hiller, Mr. Miller, Mr. Olesky and
Mr. Gibson voted "no. "
Commissioner Hiller moved to continue the item to the next meeting until an opinion is
rendered by the County Attorney on the options available for the request. Second by
Mr. Miller. Carried unanimously 7 - O.
5
May 27, 2011
ArtsNaules World Festival
Ms. Becker moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the
grant requestfor the ArtsNaples World Festival in the amount of $25,000. Second by
Mr. Hendel. Carried unanimously 7 - o.
CorriIlan Sports Enterprises
Mr. Gibson moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve both of
the Corrigan Sports Enterprises grant requests (Presidents Cup Women's Lacrosse
Tournament and High Schools Boy's Lacrosse event) in the amount of $10,000 each,
($5,000 for FYll and $5,000 for FY12). Second by Mr. Olesky. Motion carried 6
(yes" -1 ((no." Commissioner Hiller voted nno."
Naules International Film Festival
Ms. Becker moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the
grant request for the Naples International Film Festival in the amount of $10,000.
Second by Mr. Hill.
Mr. Hendel recommendedfunding in the amount of $20,000. Ms. Becker and Mr. Hill
agreed.
Motion carried 4 (yes" - 3 nno." Mr. Gibson, Mr. Olesky and Mr. Miller voted nno".
Mr. Wert noted only $10,000 was required for approval in FY12.
Mr. Olesky moved to recommend the Board of County Commissioners approve the
grant request for the Naples International Film Festival in the amount of $1 0,000.
Second by Ms. Becker. Carried unanimously 7 - o.
a. FY 11/12 TDC Category" A" Fund Budget Analysis and 10 Year Plan
Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management provided the Executive
Summary "TDC review and recommend approval of the Fund 183 and 195 10- Year Plan
and Fund 195 FYlll12 Fund Budget and Analysis Report" dated May 27,2011.
The Council heard a preliminary overview ofthe item. The Tourist Development
Council will review the item in detail at the next meeting.
Mr. Olesky moved to request that staff prepare an analysis for Council review on the
feasibility of the Coastal Zone Management Department employing their own coastal
engineers as opposed to outsourcing the work. Second by Mr. Gibson. Carried
unanimously 7 - O.
b. FY 12 Fund 195 Grant Applications
Gary McAlpin, Director, Coastal Zone Management presented the Executive
Summary "Recommendationfor the TDC to recommend approval of the TDC Category
"A" Grant Applications from the City of Naples, The City of Marco Island and Collier
6
May 27,2011
County for FY-11/12 in the amount of$23, 728,550" dated May 27, 2011 for
consideration.
The Council heard a preliminary overview of the item. The Tourist Development Council
will review the item in detail at the next meeting.
c. FY 12 Fund 183 Grant Applications
Gary McAlpin, presented the Executive Summary "For the TDC to recommend
approval of the Category "A" Tourist Development Fund 183 Grant Applicationsfor
Beach Park Facilities for FY 2011/12 in the amount of$1,025,000" for consideration.
The Council heard a preliminary overview of the item. The Tourist Development Council
will review the item in detail at the next meeting.
Commissioner Hiller moved to continue items 7 a, band c. until the next meeting.
Second by Mr. Gibson. Carried unanimously 7 - o.
g. TDC Summer Meeting Schedule
Jack Wert presented the Executive Summary "Summer Meeting Schedule for Tourist
Development Council (TDC) " dated May 27, 2011 for consideration.
The item was continued to the June TDC meeting.
8. Old Business
a. Fund 195 Project Report
b. Fund 183 Project Report
Submitted by Staff.
9. Marketing Partners Reports
c. Research Data Services
Continued
11. Detailed Staff Reports
Submitted by Staff.
12. Council Member Discussion
Jack Wert noted the EVP Volleyball Tournament will be held May 28, 2011 on
Vanderbilt Beach.
13. Next Scheduled Meeting DatelLocation - June 29, 2011 - 9:00 A.M.
Collier County Government Center, Administration Bldg. F, 3rd Floor,
3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112
Commissioner Hiller moved to hold the next regular Tourist Development Council
Meeting on June 29,2011 at 9:00 A.M Second by Mr. Hill. Carried unanimously 7 - O.
7
May 27,2011
*****
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was
adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:07 P.M.
COLLIER COUNTY TOURIST
DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
Chairman, Commissioner Georgia Hiller
These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on
as presented or as amended
8
~ ~
"& 4:.
.g U'::> ~
~ '0s C)
~~ ~ ~
0- coO ~
<3~ . 4:-
~ 0 b
..J.4-~
.r ~ ~OW ~ ~
'6 \-:co~ Q)
~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~
:t:.\-,4- ~
~ ca ~l9fu ~ ~
'\ ~~o ~
j .....VAU' ~ 0
'* 'I,/) ~w@. ~ ~
~~S ct.
E 'iG ~ -i"Si~ ~ ~
"S vi' c'1 -0 4-
'0 0 0..
~ i t;;\-'Z', $
004- "'"
it .. ~ 0
li-' 'G) N~'&1 ~
'i ~ ~~'? 4-
to 0 4.""",,Z C ~
".. \.O..J~ ~
-0 "'" <;>'0 4-
i ~ '6~~ 'I,/) 0
Q)
.~ ~r::d: 'i. ~
~ i uJ~@ \Al
$ u i. ~
~ zci~ ~
u ~~\-' <3
'" ~ 00'4. ~
"0 Ct.? ":)
;;;..; ~ 000 0 '0
c ,;>::zca. )- ~
c.a COoQ ~
ol.n.CO ~
,..,.. w Bu.1 u- u-
o :t:. ~ 0
~ ~'7\-' ~
2B~ ';
~ tn;((~ ~ ~
:d:.l9W $ ~
~ ~~o ~ ~
u:'~u.1 ;..,; ~
~co:t:. 'tA ~
U ~<3~ Ct
~
o~\:=. ~ ~
'i "'"
~4.~ 0
't)~fu "'" ~
~ .' ~l9\-: a
'G) zz\!\ 0
a 00\B 'i u-
0- ~ ';; Cl;((Ct. a
'.Q o 19 - ':1 W
'fA ~ ~ m'ln ~
0.. fwfu ;.J
\II - ~
~ ~ ';ZCl~ 4-
'4. ::>0
4 c t:.' .;; ou.,~ a <3
~ OWl/)
~ C) 4- , ~c:O\f) )- ~
~ c ~ w ..J. ~
~ '" 8~~ 3
e:, ~ ~ ~ Q:X;S 0..
$ 'i %. it ol/l
~ ~ ~
;I(
0\ Ul
"0 ~::> ~
';) \nS C)
cD
~u- ~ ~
0- cOO ~
0
~ ::J @, . 0 ~
~ -J.C:C.'Z,
0'1- ~OW Ul
0 co~ ~ a
~ ~ i..Y '4,uJ\-: \-" ~
I.y :t::t:~ ~
$ r- r- 0., ~
tG l I.f)~UJ ~
'0 ,&~o 0 \-"
G) ~~(/) ~ 0
0- 5>W@.
~ \1\ ~ \-"
'tl~S ct.
loo -2'tl c ~
6 s ~ - ~
';)
i ~o~ 0 0.
! o r- C:C. ~
~ .. ~@I.f) \-"
ti-4 ~ o\::tW ~ ~
~ ~ z,~,? 4-
to 0 4HZ C ~
~ 0 ~ \J'I~'i 2
." crt> ;I(
C ! ~ r ~z@, \1\ g
.~ ~,?C:C. 'i
CD i Ul
\fJ uJ g U1 ~
~ $ ~ (l ucO \ \-"
G) ~ z,0~ ~
"0 ~~r- 8
loo ~ U') '00'4, ~
"0 '& Ct.? ::>
~ '0
~ it 000 0
l-i C )::z~ '>'" Ul
~ ~ cOe-o ~ ~
f"""" ol.f)CO ~
rf\ w'BuJ u. '6
~ o :t: ~
W?r- ~
~ ~B~ '; ~
V)4.~ ~
- C:C.~w $ ~
~ ~~o ~ ~
u:'~uJ >.J \-"
<6cO:t: ~
U ~s~ ~
it
'i o~t::. ~ ~
\-" a
~ z43 0
'(jZ~ \-" 2
~ ~UJ
.. ~~r: ~
~ zz~ 0
a ;-It9~ i u.
0- .~ @.4.~ a
'fA .~ o~ - 'j ;
I>> wVl:
0. f\Ufu ~
U.l - \
'd. 0\ z~z 4-
4. c: ::>0 5
0 .~ ou-g.
~ 'C: owV')
C) , ~CO(J'l ,.. Ul
~ ~..;~ '5
~ ~ loo :j~~
'ti1 ~ o:t:S 0.
$ ~ ~ u(/)
\
\
,
,
~
Ji
~
o
~
*
E
~
tI-l
to
-0
~
~
l!l.
/
~
to
'0
G)
B;
""
.5
'='
~
'Q)
0.
~
~
'.Q
~
$<
a)
"'0
""
'0
;;;...I
~
~
~
~
u
'i
~
0-
\AI
'a.
~
e:,
~
1fI::>
~O
~~
coO
<3@. .
-!4.'Z
~oUJ
'4.~~
:t::t:ca
\-\-0..
U')\9W
~~O
....'6\1fI
5-W@.
~'5S
-i"Si'#.
r'l ~o
'0
t;;\-z,
o 4.
NtQU')
O,--W
z,~~
4.':jz,
\.J'\ ~
q'O
~-z@.
~r::4.
':)0
l(}COCO
z,0~
~~\-
'0 or:
,,?:.::s:.
000
~z.~
coCo
oU')co
w'Su.1
~~f:
~B~
U')4~
4.\9UJ.
~~O
u:'~u.1
~CO:t:
~<3\-
:t:
O~t:.
-Z:c!.~
u.1U -Z ~
~UJ
li ~ \9 \;;..
'::0 zz,';!.;
.... ......01.9
.~ @.4~
.~ 0 \9
G) ro~
~ ~u.1fu
~ 5~-z
.~ 0 u.. 9-
(:, 0 UJ \J)
a) ~COI.n
In \.1.1 J~
G) >-\:-!<"
"" ~4.~
if o:I:~
Cl. Olfl'-"
~
4-
~
C)
~
ill
cD.
U
\11
r'\
cD.
~
~
'-'
o
'-'
ca
~
0-
$
o
~
~
4-
i
~
~
~
'0
~
'-'
'5
S
~
~
~
'-'
~
'-'
~
o
~
o
\i-
~
;
\
~
3
0.
~
~
o
a
;.ct
c
~
'-'
~
~
o
'&\
~
o
'.i
o
'-'
~
4.
~
4-
\I)
'i
U.I
i-
<3
:>
o
,..
ct
o
\i-
~
~
~
$
~
'-'
~
~
'-'
o
'-'
~
i
'j
~
4.
~
,..
{)
'""'"
'&\
~
o
'.i
'~
Cj
~
D-
~
~~
u1\ .
~ \ ..
4,'
o \11
~ 2
~ ~
UJ
'4.
o
~
S
$
~ ~
4-
\Il
lfl? ~
\J;O C)
~() ~
~U- ~
cOO Ul
<3 @, . 4. ~
~ 0 ~
.J.4:~
~ ~ aO\J..I ~
100 cO~ r"\
0 \jj ~ u.n-: \-- ~
~ ~ :I::t:~ ~ ~
\-\-0.. \Il
CO l.fIl.9\.l.1 % ~
~ .~ ~~o 0 \--
i-<lfllfl ~ 0
V" ?'iUo
'* ~ a~~ ~ \--
~oS d-
O S
e 100 .i"Si'tl ~
\- S r'-1 -0 Ct
':) { '0 0 a.
0 ~ i' 6\-~ \-- ~
~ .. ~Ol.fl
<. i \J..IO..l ~ ~
tI-l i. ~ ~ ~~'; 4.
to 0 <(HZ 0 ~
p ~ \.O:.J....... ~
-0 o\-::'~ 4.
~ '0 i
--..> c: D ~Z@, c.n
\' '~ o <( 'i
cg C"l';0 UJ
i , l(3cOcO t ~
$. Z -\.1..1 \--
G) 4:1.9:t: $. ~
"'0 z~\- 8
100 c.n oor: ~
U ~ ;:t?C:!. ":)
;;;.; ~ oo@, 0 'a
>::~4. ,.. uJ
~ co '--' 0 d- ~
otf)cO 0 \--
~ UJsuJ u.. u..
o :I: ~ 0
~ ro~\- S
~B~ ~
~ lll;;a:~ ~ ~
4.l.9w $ ~
ct1~o ~ ~
~ --- ~~u..l ;;...; \--
j ("I"lcO:t: 'td \Il
Oa\-
U ~.:J:I: ~ ~
\--
~ 6'Z'H \-- %
Z4:5 0 0
'8~fu \-- ~
~ ~ ~1.9r: a 0
ZZ~ \:. u-
i-'t91.9
0 o;;a:'tl ~ a
D- '., ~~r-
.~ ;.J w
't;\ Q) ~u..liQ. ~
a. ;.J
uJ - z'tl\J..I t
~ i ?OZ e(
4 '.is au-a 5 8
0 uW~
c:. ctcO~
~ C) ~ ,.. ~
e \J.l J ~
uJ 3a~ 3
~ 100
e:, 0. a:I:8 a.
~ % ~ ulfl
'S.
~ ~
ClJ 4-
uJ
.~ I.fl=> :c
."'0 ~s C)
~
.cQ ~u.. ~ ~
tOO ~
C. g~ . 4-
0 0 ~
~ ~<('Z
.:e ~OUJ uJ uJ
~~~ :c ....
~\D r cQ
:I::I:~ ~ ~
r-r-o., ~
'i~ \W 1.f)t9\J.l a
~~o r
\ :z ~Vll.fl '&\ 0
=>~o r
* U\ \~ b'~cx:. ~ ct.
J 'tioS 0 e
e 'iG~ :::, .,r2~ ~ it
'S c'1 -0 Co
i~ '0 0
.~ Br-~ r So
~ .. ~@I.f) ~ 0
i~ ~ o\:'.~ ~
i lG -5 ~~::> 4.
0 \.O':J~ 0 ~
?-'O ~a- o~~ ~ 4-
~ ~cf\ ..!rOD U\ i
oz", 'i
',Q o <( uJ
('1'30
J~ , '8tOd) uJ :c
So z -uJ So r
G) <(t9:I: So ~
"0 z~r- 8
J- aO\-:: ~
~ a::.?4. 5
000 '0
>:z~ )- uJ
co C. 0 ct. :c
ol.f)tO 0 r
,..... UJ'BuJ Y- Y-
o :I: ~ 0
~ W~r- S
~B~ $
~ 1.f)a:2 ~ ;.J
4:t9w '2: ~
c:L ~zo ,.... ~
~ ~'guJ e r
('I')tO:I: 'd\ ~
oar-
U -$ ~.:J:I: Ct r
6~\:'. :c
......, r a
~ =' Z4:~
- 0
~7 '8zcx: r ~
......UJ g
.. ~t9r::
~ .--9 ~ ZVl 0
a Z....-!'(:9 t:l u..
~t9 ~
0..::t'22 ~
a. ~ ~ .~ ~ t9 _
.... ;.J ;
~ Q,) z~
U.l 0- ~uJ~ ~
uJ - z'i2uJ 0-
~ ~ ~ ~ =>oz 4- So
au.-9. ':) 8
0 t:l ".P aUJVl 0
~ C) 4. \ cx:tOl.fl )- ~
uJ J~
~ 0 uJ ':J:-l~ 3
~ J-
~ a. :...J4:
~ ~ ~ a:I:8 0-
~ aVl
So Z
IoU
~
~
i:.
Q)
'6
'';::;
',Q
G)
Co
-
~
'J'
c:
~
a.
~
~
;c(
IoU
:c
C)
ct. ~
~ ~
o ~
~ ;
l- ~
~ IoU
~ :c
o l-
~ ~
~a~
a ~ c--...\
o Co ~
l- ~ ~
~ 0
4. ~ \_
o ~ ~
~ 4. '-...D
~ i
~ IoU ~
~ :c
~ l-
a ~ \~
u 'g. ~
5 0
'>" IoU
ct :c
o l-
u. u.
U) 0
$ ~
~ ~
i ~
,-. ~
e l-
~ ~
Ct :c
:c l-
l- ~
o 0
l- ~
e 0
i ~
'j ~
U-' ~
ct Co
4. ~
5 8
'>" ~
3
Co
~
,.....
~
~
~
u
~
~
0-
uJ
~
~
~
~
'4
o
C)
~
~
~
$
~
</l-::>
'08
~U-
cOO
s@. .
_Lc:{ 'Z
:tow
~~~
FF~
0fu
illzo
~tn</l
:3ill~
~(:t.o
(:t.ou
-:i2'&
('1 -'"
.0......
6\-~
~ 61 (1)~
ii ......t:,
~ ~~
o ':j~
'8e~
'00
<z.~
g 4:-
('1'30
uJcOcO
u -u.1
~0~
z.~\-
OO~
cx::.-::>
oo@,
>::~4:-
to '-"0
o</lcO
u.1 B u.1
ffi~F
~B~
(1)4.~
4:-01.1)
~ Z. :-!u
\.J"lC
'fuu.1
<dcOF
00,
('1.......~
o~\::.
z.4:-~
u.1u z. ci.
i-'u.1
~0tl
z~t9
o~u.1
cx::.0~
Oz.,..:::.
~w~
z~u.1
-::>oz.
ou-g
()'Mtfl
-/.....(1)
tti -.....
1-i::1~
::14~
o~8
()</l
.j
-..J
\
~
"3
1r
~
~
*
e
~
tI-l
CG
-0
C.
Q)
f
\eo
(G
"S
!
~ ~
~ \
en -..
.s \.)
,
~
Q)
"0
\eo
V
.;..,;
~
,...... '~
~
~
~ ~
u
~
~
a.
~
4.
~
~
u,.\
'4
o
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ 4
~
>- ~
'Z _
~6 i
t"" U rt ti1
~u. ~ cO
coO _
9@r: 0 ~
::14.'ffi u,.\ 1"'\
4.g~ ~ ~
~UJ~ ~ (/)
~~~ ~ ~
~~~ ~ ~
%~~ g ~
~4."- 4. 0-
NOD 0 ~
~\-~ t- 0
~@ill ~ ~
~~~ ~ ~
1.0 ~ 4. 0
C?bD (/) cO
~Z~ ~ u,.\
~t::.O w ~
~co ~
~ .....- u.I ~ ~
~~F ~ U)
Z~ - 4.
HD~ :;) a
30 0
OU,,- >- u,.\
Z c::( ct ~
fuco 0 t-
IJ)CO u.. u..
@~u.I (/) 0
DHF u,.\ ~
meo ~ ~
~u\- Z.
4.4:::? ~ ~
IJ) "- . cO
<( t9 ':1 r- 4.
,,",~u e t-
~~~ ~ ~
oO\- it t-
~~:J: ~ Z.
o~~ t- 0
Z4.3 ~ S.
~~fu 0 ~
~t9t; e u..
Z~t3 \004 a
o o~~ ~ to-.
'J:i "- t9 _ ;..a ~
'.;:1 0 m Vi' ~ 0-
:. ?:;UJfu 4. ~
- Z~Z :;) 8
i' 629 0
',i:i UUJ~ >- 6
c: ex:. co H .iit
?A ~::!~ t
e =14.0
Co Ori;u
~ u
~
e
e
.....
fG
1
~
;
'S
~
~
~ 4-
~ \AI
Vl::> ~
CI\ tno C)
"'0
:s t'-4() ~
cs:l 'fuu- do us
cOO ~ cs:l
9~ . 0 ~
..)4'.'Z,
~OuJ \AI a
cO~ ~
~uJ~ \- ~
:C:C4'. ~
r';fu \AI
%. ~
10 IDzo 0 l-"
'0 O::(j)Vl ~ 0
CI) ~ID@ ~ l-"
~ 2:0::0 do
* 0::00 0 S
"" <i2'ti! ~ i:t
.tS ('ol -0 0.
C '0 0
~ br~ \- $
.5 .. ~Olll ~ 0
i uJw ~
~ ~~'S 4-
tI-4 'Q) 4'.~Z 0 ~
g. 0 l!l~~ ~
fO >- .., 4-
l-" '-- ~ '?'O i
-0 ~Z@ U)
CI\. ~
C c~ ~'S~ ~
..g .. ~ t
Q) i uJcOcO \-
U -uJ
i $ ,-\t- \ rv...t ~~:C $ ~
CI) _ z~r 8 ~
"0 ~ 'Oo~
.: \ .'~ ~ o::? :)
U ~ ~ oo@ 0 0
....., '-- >:~4'. '>" \AI
0 co '-" 0 do ~
~ OlllcO 0 \-
uJwuJ u- u-
~ oBF ~ 0
~ m~ ~ ~
~B~ ~ ~
~ 1Il4:& ~
<(~uJ $
C"'l"Zd ~ ~
~ l!l~ ~ \-
'couJ
('"I')cO:C ~ \AI
Oar ~
U ~.::J:c Ct \-
o~~ ~ %.
\-
~ Z4'.5- 0 0
'(jzct:. \- ~
......\.1..1 ~
~ ~t9tn 0
z~t5 'i u-
'O~\l.! ~
a. o::t9o:: tj S
oz~
uJ f:uJ\Q ~ 0.
z'ti!uJ 4 $
'!l \AI ~ ::>OZ :) 8
'4 ou-sa 0
0 t: O'a5lJ'l '>" u.a
~ C) 4 f6 -~ ~
..-!-j~
e 0 \AI :J<(~
~ ~ ~ a:c8 0.
\AI ~ %. OVl
$
~ ~
4-
u.a
\1)::> ::c
t;o C)
i'-tU ~
~U- ~
coO ~
9~ . 4
0 t
.-\d:'Z,
~OUJ \AI u.a
1'"\
co~ ::c CO
\;;!,UJr: t- ~
:r.:r.~ ~
r- \- 0. !
10 \1)I.9UJ %
'#.~o 0 t-
'~ .....V"l\1) ~ 0
::>~o
0. ~o::'6 ~ t-
* U') ct
o::Ou 0 ~
e ... q:-2'tl ~
to C'l -0
-s '0 0 0-
S 0\ b\-2, $
~ t-
.. ~Olll ~ 0
...
CI) UJw ~
tI-l ~ -5 ~\::.'S 4
to 0. 0 4.~Z 0 ~
~ \,O~..... ~
-0 cq.~ ~ 4
~ '0 0
C ~Z~ U') CO
.~ o d: ~ u.a
G) ~ C'l'S0 \AI ::c
f $. '(1 CO CO $. t-
Z -UJ $. ~
CI) d:1.9:r.
Zr- 8
"0 ~ ~'O\-: ~
...
Q. @?<:( ':;) '0
~ oo@ 0
0 ~~<! )- \AI
~ .......0 ct ::c
OlllCO 0 t-
,-... UJSUJ U. U.
~ 0
~ ~ ~~F t:
~B~ $ ~
~ 1Il<l:2 i ~
4:.I.9UJ
~ rt1Z0 ,.... ~
~ \,0...-4 e
~ '~UJ t-
C"'Ico:r. 'd1 u.a
go\- ::c
U C'l.:J:r. it t-
';.'\ o~\::. ::c %
t-
~ ~ Zd:3 0 0
? '(1Z~ t- ~
...-4UJ
.. 2,1.9t; 6\
;~ ... 0
CI) Z~...-4 t4 u.
e ...-41.9~ 6\
0 @<l:~ ~
a. ~ ~
',Q 01.9 - ;.J S
~ II) z~
u.l 0. ~UJ~ ~
\AI - z'tlUJ 0.
~ '4. ~ ! ::>oZ <t $.
'.., ou..S? ':;) 8
0 ~ c U'a5V"l 0
~ C) <t ~ ~ ~ )- ~
e ~J~
0 u.a :J~~ 3
% ~ 6-
~ \AI ~ o:r.8 0.
\AI ~ % U\1)
$.
~ ~
4
U1
l./l? ~
tilo C)
~()
?Qu- a ~
coO ':A
g~ . 4.
0 U
~4~
:.tow ~ U1
co~ f"'\
co
'd.wr: l-" ~
'J:'J:~ ~
\-\-0.., ~
l./lI.9W %
~~o 0 l-"
.....~~ ~ 0
6>>WCt. ~ l-"
~ ~~8 "
q:-2~ c ~
~ ~
e (0
"S ("l -0
'0 0 0.
~ B\-Z $
~ o 4 l-"
~ .. Ntnl./l ~ 0
i o~OJ ~
..... 'l -5 Z~'? 4
fG 0 4HZ 0 ~
~ If)~~ ~
-0 '?'O
C ~ ~z~ (/) g
',Q ~r::4 ~ ~
CD ~ u.J~~ U1
i $ u -w $ l-"
Q) ~1.9'J: $ ~
1J z~\- 8
~ (/) oO'd. '!
'0 ~ C:l? ~
,;;." 000 0 0
~
0 ,;>::z~ )- U1
{') ~ cooo " ~
"..,.. ol./lCO 0 l-"
\lJ wsw u. u.
~ ~ \S ~ 0
wto ~ s
~ ~ \-
l./l<t2 ~ ;.J
41.9u..\ $ ~
~ cr\Z 0 ~ ~
If).....
,?Qw >.,..,; l-"
k ~co'J: ~ U1
U os\- ~
N 'J: ~ l-"
~ o~~ l-" %
'Z43: 0 0
'dZ~ l-" ~
.....w
~ .. ~l.9til e
~ 0
Q) Z~H
C 'i u.
a. 0 'Ot9'iB e
~ 'J:; Ct.<tC:l
',Q 01.9 - 'j s
'b\ ~ Q) z~
0. ~w~ ~
U1 - z.~UJ 0.
~ ~ 4- $
4 '< ?OZ 5 8
0 t4 ..., ou-g
~ c ()~U'l
C) 4- ?A ~ ~ )- ~
~ 0 \U Q) ~...r~ 3
~ ~ ~ :.J~~
~ C.
~ 0'J:8 0.
\U 'i % ul./l
$
e' ~ ~
4-
u.1
" .0\ If)::> ~
"0\ '0;0 C)
:J\ "",,,0
~! ~u.- a ~
"--J cOO ':A
% g~ . 4
0 U
~ :14\;Z,
!:f. 4~~ u.1 u.1
J.o ~ ""'
0 '4.uJr: ~
~ :::>
~F~ ~ '"
"iO If)l.9fu ~ ~
'u ~~o 0 ~
G) .....If')1f) ~ 0
::>~o
~ b'j::tj::t W. ~
~ 'tioS ct
0 ~
J.o -i'Si'ti ~
e ~ N -0
'0 0 a-
il b\-Z $
~ 004 ~
~ .. ~ 0
i N~ill ~
tI-4 'i ~ ~~'; 4
to 0 4,=,Z 0 ~
~ \I') ~ ~
-0 ere, 4
0\ 0
C c ~z~ '" ~
',Q o C::( 'i u.1
CD , N';O
'8c;ocO u.1 ~
i $ Z -uJ \ ~
G) C::(1.9:t: ~
"'0 z~\- 8
J.o 'Oor: '!!
.... et.?4
~ :::> a
odD 0
zCi. '>" u.1
~.....C::( ct
'-"0 ~
,..... OlflcO 0 ~
UJ'SuJ u.. u..
~ \n 0
~~F t.
~B~ $
~ ~ 'j
lfI4.2 'j
41.9~ $
~ ~~o 'r;\ ~
U(~uJ ~ ~
~cO:t: ~ ~
U og\-
N :t: ~ ~
~ o~~ ~ ~
( Z4~ 0 0
~ '8~fu l- 2
~ .. ~1.9\-:: a
i Zz\n 0
i u..
a .....t51.9 e
0- 'j ',;:) ~4.~
',g 01.9 - ':1 S
u.l ~ Q) ~$ ~
a- ~~fu
~ u.1 - t
~ ~ zex:.z 4-
~ ::>0
" ou.-Q. 5 0
0 ~-j 'D U
~ C 0\JJV'l
~ ~ ct.cOlfI '>" u.1
0 u.1 ~J~ 5
~ s \ 2 ~ :.,.J=2."E.
& o:t:S a-
~ Oifl
$
~ ~ ~
-(I .g <
If)=> \II
'\l ~ \no :c
d ea I-'lU C)
.' fau.. ~
C. cOO ct
~ go ~ \II
ea
~ ,,' 0
:1<(~ ~
'" <(OUJ
0 cO~ \II
3 I;;;(UJr-: :c "
.... ea
'J:'J:~ ~ ~
- 1-1-0..
to If)t.9UJ 'Z. \II
'0 ~~o 0 :c
&. I-'lIf)If) ~ ....
~ U') =>~o 0
0',," ~ ....
'" ~o8 ct
e s ~2 UJ 0 ~
~ q- " ~
0\ N ~o
S '0
~ ~I-~ 0 a.
~~If) .... So
.... ~ ~ 0
o UJ g
fG ~~'3 c(
." ~ U'I~~ 0 ~
~ Ol-::'~ ~
C '0 <
GJ 'ZS ~z~ U') g
$ ~r-<( ~
f ~ UJ=>o w
ucOcO u.I :c
CD z ~UJ ~ ....
V C::(.t.9'J: ~ 'Z.
'" ~ ZZI- 8 ....
,- I-'ll-'l
~ DOl;;;( ~
~ Ct3 :)
OU~ 0 ....
0 r- 0
~ fa~<( >- w
,..,.. ~ .........0 ct :c
~ O~cO 0 l-
'(gSUJ II. II.
m5F ID 0
~ ~ ~ S t
If)<(~ 'Z. ~
<:(t.9 ....
~ ~z':1 ~ ~
fI"ll-'lU ~ ~
~ ~faUJ
U ~cO'J: ....,; ....
W
~gl- ~ W
~ . >- 'J: :c
~ OZt:; :c ....
Z<($ .... 'Z.
; t:1Z" 0 0
~ i.: ZI-'lUJ .... ~
CD <(19\n 0
D- c: ZZI-'l W 0
0 1-'l1-'lt.9 ~ II.
\--i ~ ~ O~UJ ~ 0
UJ Ctt.9"
t4 "i o Z ~ ~ W
~ W .... . a. ~u.J(j) ~ ti
~ ~ - ZUJCt: ~
0\ =>"~ a.
w c: c( ~
~ 0 t:; 'ZS 000 ::)
uu....... 8
C) < c: ,,~~ 0
'Z. 0 ~ u.J ~I-'l >- W
D- e 'Z. w CD .....:1~ 5
~ .. ::\<(~
~ \II C.
W ~ ~ 0'J:8
~ 'Z. UIf) a.
~
*
e
.e
.....
fG
~
G)
r
"ii
'g
Co
cJ)
~
~ ~
\J}? "
tno %.
~u r:t t1
fOu.. ~ ~
cOO _
9@r: 0 U
::14:.~ &II ~
4.~~ ~ ~
'4.UJ~ """ ~
'1:F4:. ~ &II
r-l9fu ~ ~
ffizo cJ) 0
Ct.t;)\J} U) """
=>U'l9 ~
O'~o ~ r:t
't:20Q 0 a
~~\3! ~ f
~ ~o 0 -.r
'0-.. tfi,o
'01-4 """ 0
~fdID '! ~
~ o\::.'::) 0 9
-5 ~~z _
o --':j...-l ~ 01(
U'1 ~ _ 0
C(bD cJ) ~
'bz~ 'Z. &II
~r-o &II ~
U-I~cO ! ~
u ~uJ tfi,o r"'
~~F 8 ~
...-10'4. ::>> ""'"
~3D 0 0
o~~ ~ ~
fa 00 0 r-
cO U.
DffiuJ u. 0
~EF ~ t:
ro~o '; \&.l
~br- % ~
--<:!~ i ~
tQ 19 fu ,-. ~
rt1~d e """
~fauJ ~ ~
~~F ~ ~
~.:J;t: ~ %
cS~\::t """ 0
Z4:.~ ~ %.
'8~fu 0 ~
~l9tn ~ u.
z~t5 .... 0
o~'t:2 ~ ~.
Ct::l9 ~ ~ ~
OZ'iJl \u. ~
~~fu ~ ~
~~~ ::>> 8
8fufn ~ ~
cc. cO~ ~ ~
~::1<, ...a
:-\4:,?- 0-
5'1:8
O\J}
~
i'
"
'i
~
~
.~
~
$
CD
"'0
100
'u
.;;..;
,....
~
~
~
u
~
~ 3
0.-( ~ .
~ ~ ~
V~ '4 ~
4 0 ~
u.\ ~ ~
~ ~ %
a. w ~
~ ~ 4
~
5
',z:;
.~
G)
0-
-
~
.,ti
~
CD
a.
~
&II
~
%