CCPC Backup 08/25/2010 Wccpc
[WA,
WORKSHOP
MEETING
BACKUP
DOCUMENTS
AUGUST 25, 2010
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
CCPC- WORKSHOP AGENDA
COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., AUGUST 25, 2010 IN THE BOARD OF
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT
CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA:
NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY
ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN
ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10
MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN.
PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED
IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM
OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE SPECIAL MEETING. IN ANY CASE,
WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL
BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF
SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE SPECIAL MEETING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN
PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF
THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE.
ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL
NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND
THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE
PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
2. ROLL CALL
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
4. REVIEW OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) EVALUTION AND APPRAISAL REPORT (EAR)
A. EAR OVERVIEW — MIKE BOSI
B. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT — CORBY SCHMIDT
C. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT — MIKE BOSI
D. SANITARY SEWER SUB - ELEMENT — CORBY SCHMIDT
E. POTABLE WATER SUB - ELEMENT — CORBY SCHMIDT
F. DRAINAGE SUB - ELEMENT — CORBY SCHMIDT
G. SOLID WASTE SUB- ELEMENT — CORBY SCHMIDT
H. NATURAL GROUNDWATER AQUIFER RECHARGE SUB - ELEMENT — CORBY SCHMIDT
K. HOUSING ELEMENT — MICHELE MOSCA
L. RECREATION & OPEN SPACE ELEMENT — MIKE BOSI
M. CONSERVATION & COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT — MICHELE MOSCA
N. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT — CAROLINA VALERA
O. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT — DAVID WEEKS
P. GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN — CORBY SCHMIDT
Q. IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN — CAROLINA VALERA
R. ECONOMIC ELEMENT — MIKE BOSI
S. PUBLIC SCHOOLS FACILITIES ELEMENT — MICHELE MOSCA
5. PUBLIC COMMENT — The Chairman will open the agenda for Public Comment after each of the categories noted above.
6. ADJOURN
1
�. K, �ivuszn� �le.��eYV -ar
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Presentation of the 2010 countywide affordable housing inventory.
OBJECTIVE:
To present the 2010 countywide affordable housing inventory to the Board of County
Commissioners (BCC) — inclusive of "restricted" (restricted by regulatory requirements, e.g.
Affordable Housing Agreement) and "unrestricted" (market rate) residential units.
CONSIDERATIONS:
At the June 22, 2010, Board of County Commissioners (BCC) meeting, staff was directed to
inventory unrestricted residential units within the County to determine the number of units that
can be categorized as "affordable" based on qualifying criteria of the State Housing Initiatives
Program (SHIP), and then present the results to the Board.
To create the inventory of unrestricted affordable housing units within the County, staff
conducted multiple GIS queries of the Property Appraiser's database in order to identify the
affordable mortgage ranges for the very low (50% of the County's median income), low (80% of
the County's median income) and moderate (120% of the County's median income) income
levels (refer to specific categories in the attachment titled "Staff Analysis ").
Staff mapped the affordable housing inventory for each Commission District (and, at the request
of Commissioner Fiala, who has taken the lead on this directive, for the East Naples Civic
Association (ENCA) boundaries) using the following parameters, which yields twelve (12)
different scenarios:
• affordable housing categories - very low, low and moderate income;
• household size - two and four persons (as agreed to by the BCC on June 22, 2010); and,
• monthly recurring debt - $0 and $300 (as possible representative figures of household debt,
such as student loan, car payment, credit card, etc.).
The detailed results and mapping per the above parameters are provided as attachments to this
Executive Summary; importantly, the explanation of the information depicted on the maps is
contained within the attached "Staff Analysis." The range of housing units, qualifying as
affordable, by specified area, appears in the table below.
Area
2 - Person Household /50% of Median
Income /$300 Recurring Debt: # DUs
4 - Person Household /120% of Median
Income /$0 Recurring Debt: # DUs
District 1
1,185 (28% of total)
30,293 (24% of total)
District 2
503 (12% of total)
24,455 (19% of total)
District 3
1,068 (26% of total)
31,492 (25% of total)
District 4
691 (16% of total)
17,837 (14% of total)
District 5
762 (18% of total)
23,067 (18% of total)
Total
4,209
127,144
ENCA
1,246 (30% of total)
33,875 (27% of total)
— ..".u. au vw jv1J1llP UW011111g U11115, cxccP1111uo11e Home anu cooperative units.
2. There are 196,241 dwelling units in the County, inclusive of all unit types and both ownership & rental.
BCC Directed Affordable Housing Inventory Page 1 of 3
BCC Hearing Date 12/14/10
It should be noted that the dwelling unit figures in the 120% column are cumulative, i.e. the
figures in that column include those units within the 50% column and all other scenarios not
shown in the table (see attached "Staff Analysis" for further explanation). The above ranges of
countywide totals (4,209 and 127,144) represent 2% and 65% of the total dwelling units
(196,241) in Collier County (includes all dwelling unit types in both ownership and rental units).
Additionally, the inventory results above provide only the potential supply of unrestricted
affordable housing units based on sales data for a single year (May 2009 — May 2101). It is
unknown how many of these units are actually available and how many of these units may be
presently occupied by persons meeting the qualifying income levels. Further, these data do not
provide the actual demand (need) for affordable housing units within the County.
Based upon a recent compilation of existing restricted units prepared for the Evaluation and
Appraisal Report (EAR) using best available data, the County currently has an inventory of
7,649 (plus 3,864 units approved but not yet built) restricted affordable housing units. This
inventory will fluctuate over time as additional units are approved and constructed within the
affordable housing categories, and as affordable units reach the end of the time period for which
they are required to remain at an affordable price range. Objective 1 of the Housing Element
presently states, "The number of new affordable- workforce housing units shall increase by at
least fifteen percent of the units approved to be built in the County per year, but not less than
1,000 units per year averaged over a five -year period in an effort to continue meeting the current
and future housing needs of legal residents with very-low, low and moderate incomes, including
households with special needs such as rural and farmworker housing in rural Collier County."
However, the University of Florida's Shimberg Center for Housing Studies indicates a need for
an additional 732 affordable housing units each year beginning in year 2010 to 2015; 881
affordable housing units each year beginning in year 2015 to 2020; 890 affordable housing units
each year beginning in year 2020 to 2025; and, 856 affordable housing units each year beginning
in year 2025 to 2030. As part of the EAR, staff will be recommending the Objective be changed.
This inventory of unrestricted affordable housing units may also be useful in supporting the
recommendation to lower the requirement in this Objective.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The information presented has no fiscal impact, as this is an informational item only.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT:
The information presented has no GMP impact, as this is an informational item only.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS:
There are no legal considerations, as this is an informational item only. -STW
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners accept the methodology and findings
in this Executive Summary and associated attachments; and, direct staff to submit these
documents with the Evaluation and Appraisal Report as data and analysis that could potentially
support the County's recommendation to reduce the number of restricted affordable housing
units that are required to be constructed annually.
BCC Directed Affordable Housing Inventory Page 2 of 3
BCC Hearing Date 12/14/10
Prepared by: Michele Mosca, AICP, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, Land
Development Services Department, Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation
Attachments: 1) Staff Analysis 2) Affordable Housing Map Series
BCC Directed Affordable Housing Inventory Page 3 of 3
BCC Hearing Date 12/14/10
Staff Analysis — BCC Directed Affordable Housing Project
Steps to create the inventory of "unrestricted" affordable housing units within the County:
• Conduct a GIS query from the Property Appraiser's database of all residential sales from May
2009 through May 2010, by the closing sales price, and based on the State Housing Initiatives
Program (SHIP) 2010 income limits for two and four person households, and assuming that
those households have no ($0) monthly recurring debt. The affordable mortgage for those
households earning 50% (very low), 80% (low) and 120% (moderate) of the County's median
income of $72,300 is as follows:
a. A 2- person household earning 50% of the median income could afford a mortgage of
$74,952; and, a 4- person household earning 50% of the median income could afford
a mortgage of $103,430.
b. A 2- person household earning 80% of the median income could afford a mortgage of
$143,576; and, a 4- person household earning 80% of the median income could afford
a mortgage of $189,260.
c. A 2- person household earning 120% of the median income could afford a mortgage
of $235,259; and, a 4- person household earning 120% of the median income could
afford a mortgage of $303,607.
Conduct a GIS query from the Property Appraiser database of all residential sales from May
2009 through May 2010, by the closing sales price, and based on the SHIP 2010 income limits
for 2 and 4 person households, and assuming that those households have a three hundred
dollar ($300.00) monthly recurring debt. The affordable mortgage for those households
earning 50% (very low), 80% (low) and 120% (moderate) of the County's median income of
$72,300 is as follows:
a. A 2- person household earning 50% of the median income could afford a mortgage of
$27,489; and, a 4- person household earning 50% of the median income could afford
a mortgage of $55,967.
b. A 2- person household earning 80% of the median income could afford a mortgage of
$96,113; and, a 4- person household earning 80% of the median income could afford
a mortgage of $141,496.
c. A 2- person household earning 120% of the median income could afford a mortgage
of $187,796; and, a 4- person household earning 120% of the median income could
afford a mortgage of $256,143.
Establish a "discount" factor for the specified one -year period by comparing the Sales Price
to the Total Just Values for qualifying properties (affordable housing threshold range of $0 —
$303,607), followed by averaging the percentage change (sum of percentage change for all
properties divided by the total number of properties) for those same properties; this yielded a
discount factor of -12.42 percent.
• Apply the established discount factor of -12.42 to the countywide residential inventory to
derive the number of affordable units at the various affordable mortgage thresholds described
above.
The following two tables depict the number of unrestricted housing units categorized as
affordable, organized by Commission District and the area encompassed by the East Naples
Civic Association (ENCA). This data provides the potential supply of affordable housing units.
However, it is unknown how many of these units are actually available; it is unknown how many
of these units may be presently occupied by persons meeting the qualifying income levels; and,
the data does not identify the demand (need) for affordable housing units. The need for
affordable housing by geographic area may be more readily identified using the 2010 Census
data, once it is released.
It should be noted that the dwelling unit figures listed in each row is cumulative. For example, in
District 1, the 4- person household count within the 50% median income range includes those
units within the 2- person household count within the 50% median income range, and the 4-
person household count within the 120% median income range includes all units listed in the
table for District 1. Similarly, the data shown on the attached maps also reflect cumulative
figures.
$300 Monthly Recurring Debt
50% of Median
Income
80% of Median
Income
120% of Median Income
Area
2- Person
Household
4- Person
Household
2- Person
Household
4- Person
Household
2- Person
Household
4- Person
Household
District 1
1,185
2,389
10,422
17,180
21,540
27,768
District 2
503
1,388
3,691
10,572
16,588
21,796
District 3
1,068
2,412
9,307
18,214
24,285
29,645
District 4
691
1,787
4,680
10,479
13,779
16,486
District 5
1 762
2,570
8,237
14,767
19,202
22,226
Total
4,209
10,546
36,337
71,212
95,394
117,921
ENCA
1,246
2,932
12,523
22,676
27,966
32,463
The unit counts include all ownerstup aweumg units, exccpi 1110 011C iiuuic auu cvvpuauvc u --
There are 196,241 dwelling units in the County, inclusive of all unit types and both ownership & rental.
Overall, the above table shows District 3 contains the largest inventory of potential affordable
housing units, followed by District 1, and District 4 contains the least amount.
2
The following identifies each respective Commission District's highest range of affordable
housing dwelling units as a percentage of the countywide dwelling unit total (196,241) in Collier
County (includes all dwelling unit types in both ownership and rental units).
District 1: The highest (27,768) dwelling unit count represent 14 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 2: The highest (21,796) dwelling unit count represent 11 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 3: The highest (29,645) dwelling unit count represent 15 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 4: The highest (16,486) dwelling unit count represent 8 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 5: The highest (22,226) dwelling unit count represent 11 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
$0 Monthly Recurring Debt
50% of Median Income
80% of Median Income
120% of Median Income
Area
2- Person
Household
4- Person
Household
2- Person
Household
4- Person
Household
2- Person
Household
4- Person
Household
District 1
5,513
11,941
17,365
21,679
26,301
30,293
District 2
2,033
4,604
11,003
16,733
20,514
24,455
District 3
5,437
11,225
18,381
24,474
27,619
31,492
District 4
2,681
5,480
10,610
13,905
15,720
17,837
District 5
4,844
9,206
14,961
19,351
21,471
23,067
Total
20,508
42,456
72,320
96,142
111,625
127,144
ENCA
6,655
14,778
22,884
28,177
31,414
33,875
..,C uIIIL wwns uiduuc an ownership awenmg units, except mo hiie home and cooperative units.
There are 196,241 dwelling units in the County, inclusive of all unit types and both ownership & rental.
Overall, the above table shows District 3 contains the largest inventory of potential affordable
housing units, followed by District 1, and District 4 contains the least amount.
3
The following identifies each respective Commission District's highest range of affordable
housing dwelling units as a percentage of the countywide dwelling unit total (196,241) in Collier
County (includes all dwelling unit types in both ownership and rental units).
District 1: The highest (30,293) dwelling unit count represent 15 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 2: The highest (24,455) dwelling unit count represent 13 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 3: The highest (31,492) dwelling unit count represent 16 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 4: The highest (17,837) dwelling unit count represent 9 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
District 5: The highest (23,067) dwelling unit count represent 12 percent of the countywide
dwelling unit sum.
4
500/6 . of the 201.0 Median income
of $72,,3.,.00 for a 2 Person H,o us, eshol;d
with a $0 Reoccurr•i;ng Monthly.
Debt - Affordable Mortgage Amount is $74,952
(Units distributed by Commis.sio.n District)
800/6, of the 201;0 Medi;a:n income-
of $72:,,300 ficfr a 2: Pe.rs.o:n H.ous:e.s.ho:ld
wi,t,h a $0 Reocc:u.rr•i,ng Monthly
Debt Affo.r,dable Mortgage Amount. is $143.,,576
(Un(ts- distributed by Commission District)
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
as of 1 010112 0 1 0)
r
i
I I
1 t
SA
012 4
v Miles
'3IS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AIOP
IECHOI.00Y 8 GIs SUPPORT
3ROWrH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
v
•
•
M
TOTAL UNITS: 72,320
•
•
IIvIMOKALEE RD E
C 58,
OIL WELL RD
is
T1
1200/, o_f the 2010 Me_.dlan Inc.:ome
of $721,3.00 for a 2- Person Ho.us,e_s:hold
with a, $.0 Reo:C.:curring Monthly,
Debt Affordable Mortgage. Amount 1,51 $23.5,250
(Units. di.stri.buted by Commission D.ist:rict)
RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION DISTRICT
000 Q
- 0 0
p
TOTAL UNITS: 111,625
o INSMct1 Dmshict2 Distif,t DNbi.lI INsGictS I
COMMISSION DISTRICT UNITS SF MF'
District 1 26301 6543 19758
District 2 20514 6437 14077
District 3 27619 11178 16441
District 4 1 5720 5233 10487 1
District 5 21471 17005 4466
TOTAL 11162 46396 65229 �• • e
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
as of 10/01/2010)
it
•
. -
RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION DISTRICT
o.00
LEE
O
4-
INstriclt Olstriet2 Di-03 Dlsbict4 Disxicf5
COMMISSION DISTRICT
UNITSI
SF
MF
District 1
17365
3153
14212
District 2
( I Georgia Hiller, Commission District 2
11003
2096
8907
District 3
18381
5103
13278
District 4
U, i
iq,pt - § li 4
10610
3215
7395
District 5
ebt at SO% of the 2010
Median
clan income
14961
1169C
3271
TOTAL
72320
252571
47063
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
as of 1 010112 0 1 0)
r
i
I I
1 t
SA
012 4
v Miles
'3IS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AIOP
IECHOI.00Y 8 GIs SUPPORT
3ROWrH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
v
•
•
M
TOTAL UNITS: 72,320
•
•
IIvIMOKALEE RD E
C 58,
OIL WELL RD
is
T1
1200/, o_f the 2010 Me_.dlan Inc.:ome
of $721,3.00 for a 2- Person Ho.us,e_s:hold
with a, $.0 Reo:C.:curring Monthly,
Debt Affordable Mortgage. Amount 1,51 $23.5,250
(Units. di.stri.buted by Commission D.ist:rict)
RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION DISTRICT
000 Q
- 0 0
p
TOTAL UNITS: 111,625
o INSMct1 Dmshict2 Distif,t DNbi.lI INsGictS I
COMMISSION DISTRICT UNITS SF MF'
District 1 26301 6543 19758
District 2 20514 6437 14077
District 3 27619 11178 16441
District 4 1 5720 5233 10487 1
District 5 21471 17005 4466
TOTAL 11162 46396 65229 �• • e
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
as of 10/01/2010)
it
•
. -
�
1?N A ,
175
4-
MAPLEGEND
•
•
COMMISSION DISTRICT:
Donna Fiala, Commission District t'�
( I Georgia Hiller, Commission District 2
- Tom Henning, Commission District 3'"
•
Fred Coyle, Commission District 4
? � s
Jim Coletla, Commission District 5
RESIDENTIAL
U, i
iq,pt - § li 4
s•
UNITS(axeludes mobil• homol
• 2 Person Household with $0 Reoccurring
Monthly
-. �.
^r'x
ebt at SO% of the 2010
Median
clan income
a„n ' • 1 1 1
\
r''a
TyM
�ty�TR
•
s •
•
9
,1, �r� i t'�
012 4
® Miles
GIs MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP
TEO)IOI,OGY & GIS SUPPORT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
•
T
Air 58
OIL WELL RD
•
175 •
MAP LEGEND
• COMMISSION DISTRICT;
Donne Fiala, Commission District i
Georgia Filler, Commission DISWd 2
. Tom Hanaleg, Commission District 3
Fred Coyle, Commission Distnd 4
Jim Coletta, Commission District 5
RESIDENTLAL U NITS!ax IuL -a �i1dL- 1.�
2 Person Household wi01$0 ReoccUmag
Mongry Debt at 120% of the 2010
•\ Madan Income
is •
TRH
•
•
w
$_00/6 of the 2010 Median income.
of $72,300 fq.r .1, 4 Per's.qn Hiousesihq1d
With a $O Reoccurring Mo-nthly
Debt - Affordable. Mqrtgage Amount. 14 $,103,,430
(Units, distributed by, Cqmmis
.!%iqn District.)
RESIDENTIAL UNITS By COMMISSION DISTRICT
O
o
COMMISSION DISTRICT
UNITS
SF
MF
District 1
11941
1787
10154
District 2
4604
335
4269
District 3
11225
3824
7401
District 4
5480
1579
3901
District 5 _
9206
7692
1514
TOTAL
42456 1
15217
27239
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser
as of 10/0112010)
3 •
Itti
•
NL srti
K i ", X:
9
.SAN pry
A
0 1 2 4
mm:zi•iiiii Miles
CIS MAPPING: BCTI I YANG, AICP
ICCHOLGGY & GIS SUPPORT
GROWTI I MANAGEMENT DIVISION
•
41
TOTAL UNITS: 42,456
•
•
FIR
4
0
80%, of the 2010 ,
Madian income
of $,7,2,3.00 for a 4
Person Hqu, !s.esh9,[d
with a $0 Reqcquirr-ing Menthly.
Debt. w Affordable Mor-tqagq Amq,unt 1* $1,89,,,260
(Units. dIst,rtbLlJed by
QommIs_*i,on Pi.s.,trict),
RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION DISTRICT
RESIDENTIAL UNITS By COMMISSION DISTRICT
L
TOTAL UNITS: 127,144
Di.W.1 Di.W.2 M.W.0 Di-14 Di.W.15
COMMISSION DISTRICT UNITE SF MF
MF
M
District 1
30293
8160
IF
22133
3
12
District 2
24455
8197
1 6258
16258
TOTAL UNITS: 96,142
Di.bi,t I Di,t,iO 2 DIW Dilei— DiWdii
14359
1 1
17133
COMMISSION DISTRICT
UNITS
SF
MF
5762
District 1
21679
4853
16826
23067
18380
4687
District 2
16733
4607
12126
as of 1010112010)
r
District 3
24474
8712
15762
District 4
13905
4541
9364
19
District 5
19351
15281
4070
TOTAL
961421379941
58148
aeb
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
•
as of 10101/2010)
X9
C& 858 ell t r
nl � ILA r
a
MAPLEGEND
• COMMISSION Lu
Donna I" commission District i
J Georgia Hiller, Commission District 2
Tom Henning, Commission District 3
Fred Coyle, Commission District 4
Jim Colefla, Commission District 5
RESIDENTIAL UNITSagrjudas mobile homs!
4 Person Household Wilt $0 R,,=,ft
Monthly Debt at 50% of the 2010
Median Income
"com"'
!!�4
•
•
175
4.
-be
0 1 2 4
nil Miles
GIS MAPPING: BETFI YANG, AICP
TECHOLOGY A 018 SUPPORT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
1, 9, 0 G/q Q, f the he 2.010 Madtan Income
of $72,,,300 for a
4 Person Hiluses,hotd
With a $0 Ile
_occurring MQnth1y
Debt m Affqr-da.bl,e Mortgage
• Amount k4- 1 $303,6:07
(Units dIsItributqd
by, CommissJon Q
.1-stirtet)
RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION DISTRICT
o
L
TOTAL UNITS: 127,144
Di.W.1 Di.W.2 M.W.0 Di-14 Di.W.15
COMMISSION DISTRICT UNITE SF MF
MF
M
District 1
30293
8160
IF
22133
3
District 2
24455
8197
1 6258
16258
District 3
31492
14359
1 1
17133
District 4
17837
5762
12075 4
19
District 5
23067
18380
4687
TOTAL 127144 1 548581 72286
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
A16,
as of 1010112010)
r
Ap 1.1L WELL RD,/—
4, •
U5
MAP LEGEND
MAP LEGEND
COMMISSION )ISTRICT. •
COMMISSION DISTRICT, •
Donna Fiala, Commission District i
Dennis Flala, Commission Dislincill
Georgia Hiller. Commission District 2 Georgia Hiller, Commission District 2
Tom Henning, Commission District 3 V" 41" Tom Henning, commission District 3
Fred Coyle, Commission District 4
1211v Fred Coyle, Commission District 4
Jim Coletta. Commission District 5
Jim Coilefla, Commission District 5
RESIDEKTIAL UNITS(excludes mobile haritill 4"L RESIDENTIAL UNITS(excludes mobile Wallis):
4 Person Household wWth $0 Reoccurring 4 Person Household with $0 Reoccuffiry
Monthly Debt at 8096 of the 2010 • Monthly Dow at 120-Y of the 2010
fillatillan Income Madan Income
S
•
•
0 1 2 4
off=iiiiiiii■ Miles
GIs MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP
TECHOLOGY A GIs SUPPORT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
500/6 of the 2010 , Median Income
of $72,,300 fo:r a 2 Pers.o_n Houseshoid
with a; $300 Reoccurring Monthly,
Debt - Affordable Mortgage Amount is $27,,489
(llni;ts, distributed by Commission Distri,c.t),
t RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION DISTRICT
{raa Q O
TOTAL UNITS: 4,209
COMMISSION DISTRICT
UNITS
SF
MF
District 1
1185
7
1178
District 2
503
0
503
District 3
1068
4
1064
District 4
691
0
691
District 5
762
251 1
1
TOTAL
4209
262
3947
(Source: Gollier Property Appraiser Data
as of 10101/2010)
•
D omh
7� •
t '
•
� O
012 4
v Miles
GIS MAPPING; BETIJ YANG, AICP
TECIIOLOGY A GIS SUPPORT
GRO WIN MANAGEMENT DIVISION
•• •
•
IMMOKALEE RD E
•
175
80 %, of the 201;0 Median I;nc.,ome-
o:f, $;7,2,,300 for, a 2° Per's.on Ho;u,s.eshol;d
with a $,300 Reocc:urr.i,ng Monthly
Debt, , Af :fo:rda.bie Mortgage Amo.u:nt is. $:96,,1.13:
(Units, dis,tribut.ed by i:o.,
Commis.sn District),
21540
RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION OISTRICT
16740
District 2
16588
4543
12045
District 3
24285
§
15645
District 4
13779
°
TOTAL UNITS: 36,337
District 5
District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5
—
COMMISSION DISTRICI
UNITS
SF
MF
District 1
10422
1624
8798
District 2
3691
193
3498
District 3
9307
3363
5944
District 4
4680
1257
3423
d
District 5
8237
6802
1435
' a
1
TOTAL
3633713239
23098
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
as of 10 101/2010)
_
w
CR 858, •
WELL RD
{�M 3 DEL WELL RD
to t •
2
i ••
IfRF. D�
)EN AT 1W
• -♦ • 175
• 5
1 �
MAPLEGEND
COMMISSION DISTRICT. r!aF r."'ti�„ • {
Donne Flats, Commission District 1 i ,X1, •
Georgia Hiller, Commission Disrid 2
Tom Flaming. Commission District 3tiPr71q^ t I r •
Yx
Fred Coyle. Commission District 4
R
Jim Coletta, Commission District 5 ` ,'4 I++ • ti•1
RESIDENTIAL UNITS(axdudas moWl• hamesh 1 � � 1 I � I � •
2 Person household with $300 Reocamrg
MonWy Debt at 50% of the 2010
Medan Income :le
NA
•
012 4
v Miles
GIS MAPPING: OBfH YANG, AICP
TECHOLOGY 6 GIs SUPPORT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
{
MAPLEGEND
COMMISSION DISTRICT:
Donne Fiala. Commission District 1
l i Georgia Hater, Commission District 2
- Tom Henning, Commission District 3
Fred Coyle, Commission Dislnct 4
Jim Colelta, Commission District 5
RESIDENTIAL UNITS(excludas mobile homes)
40 2 Person Household with $300 Reoccurring
Monthly Debt at BO% of the 2010
Medan Income
s
Y•
1.200/4 of the 2010 Median Income
o>f $72,13.00 f.o.r a. 2. Per-s.o:n Ho,usesho.Id
Wtt,h a: $300 Re- ioc.curr.i.ng Monthly
Debt Affor.dabl:e. Mortgage Amount: i,s, $187,796
(U:nits distributed by C-;ommi,s:si,on DI
stric -t);
RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION DISTRICT
me Q
�I
dit
COMMISSION DISTRICT
UNITS
SF
MF
District 1
21540
4800
16740
District 2
16588
4543
12045
District 3
24285
8640
15645
District 4
13779
4508
9271
District 5
19202
15157
4045
TOTAL
95394
3764
57746
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
as of 10101/2010)
S ;
M
)FN
•
' 4. r
•
4e, r1 {
• ,
*
N: .i
sAIN
ty u
I l
012 4
v Miles
GIs MAPPING: 8011 YANG, AICP
TECI iOLOGY IN GIs SUPPORT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
TOTAL UNITS: 95,394
s
•
•
rMMOKALEE RD E \
• �s
•
C 58
OIL WELL RD
s
C
•�� 175 •
MAP LEGEND
COMMISSION DISTRICT
Donna Flats, Commission District 1
Georgia Hiller, Commission District 2
- Tom Henning, Commission District 3
Fred Coyle, Commission District 4
Jim Colella, Commission District 5
RESIDENTIAL UNITS(excludgs mobile .
2 Person Fbuselo d l with $300 Reoccurring
MonOay Debt at 120% of Ole 2010
Medan Income
v
50% of the 2:010 Median Income,
of $72,300 f:o,r a, 4 Person , Ho.0
. ses-hQld
with a. $300 R - eo,ccurring Mot-
,n,hly
Debt, - Affordable Mortga.ge Amount is $55,967
(Units, dist.riblittted by COmmiss!Q.n District).
RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION DISTRICT
DI.W,t I District 2
COMMISSION DISTRICT
UNITS
SF
MF
District 1
2389
135
2254
District 2
1388
0
1388
District 3
2412
35
2377
District 4
1787
75
1712
District 5
2570
1648
922
TOTAL
10546 118931
8653
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
as of 10
N1/2010)
•
• Ut
.f=
a.
& r.
*a
G, AII;
. 0A all, &p.
4-
SANI
ri
0 1 2 4
EK=iiiiiiiiiii Miles
GIB MAPPING: BEI'l-I YANG, AICP
TEGHOLOGY & GIB SUPPORT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
TOTAL UNITS: 10,546
is
W
•
0
MAPLEGEND
COMMISSION DISTRICT:
Donna Fiala, Commission Disinct I
Georgia Hiller, Commission District 2
Tom Henning, Commission District 3
Fred Coyle, Commission District 4
Jim Colette, Commission District 5
RESIDENTIAL UNITS(oxcludos mobile horriji
4 Person Household with $300 Reoccurring
Monthly Debt at 50% of the 2010
Median Income
Ii : �
80%, of the 2010 Median lncQ,me
0-f $,72,,300 for a, 4 Pers.Qn H,Qus-eshold
with a $'300 Reoccurring Monthly
Debt - Affordable Mortgage Amount. is $1411,496
(Units, dis.tribu-ted by Commissia.ri Di,strict)
RESIDENTIAL UNITS By COMMISSION DISTRICT
TOTAL UNITS: 71,212
Districts Di,W,t4
14 ""r""
mi
COMMISSION DISTRICT UNITS SF MF
1 7 180 3063 1 4 1 1
1 0 1 9
-55stna 1 17180 3063 1411
District 2 10572 1958 8614
District 3 18214 5002 1321
District 4 10479 3147 7332
District 5 14767 11505 3262
TOTAL 1 71212 1 246751 46537
•
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data
as of 10/OV2010) \
M;
IMMOKALEE RD E
3 * OIL WELL RD
jp •
FF -w
'2t. 175
r
p�
0 1 2 4
Miles
GIB MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP
Y ECI IOLOGY & GIB SUPPORT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISIOP
I
MAPLEGEND
COMMISSION DISTRICT:
Donna Flals, Commission Distill 1
Georgia Paler. Commission District 2
Tom Henning, Commission District 3
Fred Coyle, Commission District 4
Jim Coletta, Commission District 5
RESIDENTIAL UNITS(ox5ludits motilla homes
4 Person Household with $300 Reoccurring
Monthly Debt at 80% of the 2010
Median Income
f
•
I2-00/4 of the 201,0 Media-in Income
of "'2-0-00 for a 4. Persq,n Kq.uses,hotd
with a $.300 Re-occurring Mqnthly
Debt - A.ffqrdabi..o Mortgage, Amount is $25,13,143
(Units distribuit.ed by C-0mmilssion District)
RESIDENTIAL UNITS BY COMMISSION DISTRICT
a=
TOTAL UNITS: 117,921
Districl5A
COMMISSION DISTRICT UNITS SF MF
'
District 1 27768 T —oi -20-667
District 2 21796 6987 14809
District 3 29645 12790 16855
District 4 16486 5472 11014 It
District 5 22226 17599 4627
TOTAL 117921499491 67972
(Source: Collier Property Appraiser Data - -
asofl 0/0112010) F -pkik" 7
t.
a-
sA
0 1 2 4
Miles
GIB MAPPING! BETH YANG, AICP
TECI IOLOGY & GIB SUPPORT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
91
:E RIDE
0
L
C 58
IL WELL RD
•
175
MAPLEGEND
COMMISSION DISTRICT. •
Donna Fiala, Comr1lission District I
Georgia Hiller, Commission District 2
Tom Henning, Commission District 3
Fred COY18, Commission District 4
Jim Coleha, Commission District 5
RESIDENTIAL UNITSfaricludes mobile III s
4 Person Household with M R —111
Monthly Debt at 12D% of the 201
Median Income
O/•
50%0 of the. 2010 Median Income 800/6, of tho 2010 Median I;nc%me. 120 " /'
Of, $,72,,3,00 fqr a 2 Person House.shatic! o.f $72•,3.00 for a 2 Psrson Hggsesho_1_d Q 4f' fhe 2010 Median Lncome
of Z2,$00 fgr a 2 Person Ho.us.eshoid
with a $.0 Re.accu.rri:ng Mo:nthly,' with a $0, Reoccurring Manthty_
Debt_ - Affo,Itdabis Mortgage Amqunt is $T4,,95.2 pa4 -f - Aff.ordable Mo.r.tgage Amount is $.14.3,,$6 tth a $0 Reocgcugrri,ng Monthly
U 4ebt - Affgrdabis. Mo -r.t a; a A.mgunt is. $23.5,.259
(Units fo -.r East _apies Civic. Associ,atio.n) (; nits,' for• East Rapl.es._ Givkc, Association), (Units, lot East: Napies 4feic Assgci:at`fo.ni
,r
a - a �
PINE RID E RD PINE RIDGE RD EXT a
�
o D
z J E RD FINE RIDGE RD IXT
PINE RI
I
ID E IDGE RD EXT
- PINE R E RD PINE
h
Z
GREEN BLVD TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 6,655 ' �: TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 22,884 z
ITS
SINGLE FAMILY: 1,298 1 k "F GREEN SINGLE FAMILY: 5,239 W GREEN BLVD S GLE FAMILY 10,601 31,414
lu TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UN
IN
;.MULTI - FAMILY: 6,357 MULTI- FAMILY: 20,813
m y °g Z ; MULTI- FAMILY: 17,645 o z l
J ;
OLDEN ATE Pk - • ¢ : ••• . m _ .a m .
•
• i •' w OLDEN •••• ¢ �• �', .m ,
• . `� � - _ .. W LDE
. � ON
• • •
ow
Io:.� RAC510 RD' .. 1,75 •.« - • • .. .
s, d ,_ • ' REY
+ _
a `� DAMS BLVD • . f • _
t• Its �• • .off DAVIS m V•
z
r ••! >► . • - ey
m in r �J • •t ' —
z
•
IN Zr-
r t N N A A I • K •. �.•
V.
• t
N� ' ' '�� • SABAL PALM RD
'• ! •
• Y - \ � SABAL PALM RD
` �••• •- •' .. •'• - �' SABAL PALM RD
cr
_ MANATEE RD. "Ni yy c` / •.' ,.1,.. 4
RD, i !
.�ir n P -O �• 4' t. .. - t MANATEE RD, "�8r
`: • � fb • • � I
•:
it t r � cc c : � __ ... � �
¢{+P: t ` '•N/ 7 as c. ` 'ifs • lq
I. y
MAP LEGEND
MAP LEGEND MAP LEGEND
I�East Naples Civic
Association Boundary O East Naples Civic
Roads 'i `o- Associaton Boundary 1.. ,P c East Naples Civic
., Roads ' I� Association Boundary .m +
Water Bodies - `°'� S'
• $ U l _ I f 7 Roads
RESIDENTIAL UNITSIexludes mobile honi O U Water Bodies
mo I -
u 2 Person Househod with SO Reoaumnq RESIDENTIAL UNITSIouludos bo omosl
,
m RESIDENTIAL UNITSIC■cIL.Ies mobllo ho
Monthly Debt at 50% of the 2010 .� ��r 2 Person Household vnlh SO Reoccum 9 i m >>,.
Median Income mo Monthly Debt at B0% of the 2010 r �r � 2 Person Household with $0 Reoccurring
Median Income • ,, 1 P' • Monthly Debl at 120% of the 2010,
. � A - Median iwzme
O RA &'
z /J:
C1
0 1 2 4
Miles ,— ,. " M 0 1 2
iAe F
0 1 2 4
Milesf:
.GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP + : ` Miles `
TCCHOLOGY B GIS SUPPORT GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP
GROW rH MANAGEMENT DIVISION ' "' "" +� TCCHOLOGY 8 GIS SUPPORT GIS MAPPING: BET If YANG, AICP t I
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION TECHOLOGY 8 GIS SUPPORT
- GROWTH MANAGCMENT DIVISION
50 %0 of the 2010 Median Income 80% of the 2010 Median Income. 1..20% of the 2010 Me..dta_n tncgme
of $72,,3.,00 for a 4 Pe_r•s,o.n Hous:eshold of $72,;3,00 far, a 4 Person Hou..ses,hoid of $:7•,2,,300 far a 4 Per.. -s_on House,s.ho_.I:d
with a $0 Reoccurring Mo,nthL,y, with a,,. $0 Reoc_curri,ng Mo_.nthl.y. with a SO R.eac,curri.ng Monthl:�•
Debt Affor..dable Mortgage Amount is, $103;,430 Debt. - Aff "orda:bl,e_: Mortgage Amount ts. $.1,8.9,2.60 Debt Af.f.ordable Mortgage ng o.u.,nt is $;303,607
(Units for East Naples Civic A.ssocta.tio.n) (Units, far East, Naples. Civic As,sactation): _
50% of the 2:41.0 Median Income 80 %: o;f the 2:01;0 Median Income 120oq of the 2,010 Medla;n Lncome
of $72,300 for a; 2: Pers:o_:n Ho.usgshold of $.72,,3,00 for. a 2 Pe_r.son liouseshold of, SZ'2,300 for a 2. Person n Iu,s.eshol.d
with a $3.00 Re.o,ccurri,ng Monthty,,' with a $.3:00 Reoccytrri,ng Monthly vtlt;i;th a $3.00
Debt - Affordable Mortgage Amount is $2:7,489 Debt - Affo.•r.dable, Mortgage Amount is $96,113 Reoc:cu.r,ri,ng Mo:nthl.y'
(Units for East Naples Clvlc Assoc.lation) (U,nits f. o. r.' East Naples C:iYic Association) Debt Aff.o.rdabl:e Mortgage A.mo:unt, i,s $1:87,,796
(Unit* for East Naples; Clvlc Assoclatlo.n)
PINE RID E RD PINE RIDGE RD EXT
Z
• .PINE RID 'E RD PINE IDGE RD EXT `PINE RID E RD PINE IDGE RD IXT
' _ °
Uj TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 1,246 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL. UNITS: 12,523 ° }
w Z GREEN BLVD R
' SINGLE FAMILY: 35 q 4 GREEN BLVD TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 27,966
..SINGLE FAMILY: 2,721 z. GREEN BLVD
° 4, -' - 1 SINGLE FAMILY: 8,382
8 MULTI - FAMILY: 1,211 a MULTI - FAMILY: 9,802 °
m m .. MULTI- FAMILY: 19,584
OLDEN ATE P % • iY
IOU
_ i, +- �R' RADIO RD'..4 g' •if li :M' •� ..
..:e �. _ ... .._ -_.. .... -- "4� .RADIO RD `« •i
ao 1-75
t. ,�•� .f
♦ DAVIS.BLVD u' •
• • f• DAVIS$LVD �' • j
• e
r •f. : �• _ Z • • T : • '}'* DAMS
1 I�K . ` Ty 1t••
till
O �eyy • ��
A. - N KETI• `e
y� SABAL PALM RD l » •- .� •' • • i '.
i,•�: - :. '• ~� .� SABAL PALM RD 1 ..� ••
` ` `• il•. �. SABAL PALM RD
• : is ;: • A r+•.i . , • '(• •.. •" ,
• y v j' •
i1 • ♦. j : ••
- r MANATEE RD -'�1ir -'1: • rq'�i!
;. (� ? i R(, S - ' ,� •MANATEE RD,
kkofrEE RD. ""L� •
% a
o #' rq�r
"
t 1 ✓ ��TgryT �i s are . .- rgyr
� � � !• � •� '9,yriT
I
MAP LEGEND {
MAPLEGEND j
East Naples Civic U > MA P L E G E N D
Association Boundary .� - Q East Naples Civic ' `° 2 • l -�
Roads Association Boundary I ,m _•� i Q East Naples C v,c �o
Water Bodies " : K. I Roads • Association Boundary ,m r
RESIDENTIAL UNITStexcludes mobllo homes) : � - Water Bodies 'f�1."9?, rY �� �'" Water Bodies �4 i,-.
2 Person Household with $300 Reoccurnng y -.; .I' I RESIDENTIAL UNITStexcludes mobile homosl ° * ��
Monthly Debt at 50°/ of the 2010 ° °'Q. ,.moo ! 2 Person Household wvlh $300 Reocarnng 9'.'. �`' RESIDENTIAL UNITSIC>tclude ti m • f
Median Income I o 6 Monthly Debt aI cu % o1 the 201 D ® 2 Person Household vnth $300 Reoccvmrg - f,.
Median Income L. ��5„y : •' `k' Monthly Debt at 120% o1 the 2010
Median Income
,,le
-4AN -
:,
R
rt lip II
0 1 2 J
4Miles, I +lo-
�x s 0 1 2 4 p 0 1 2
. e
_ I Miles
GIS MAPPING; BETH YANG, AICP Miles" ° tl
e
TECHOLOGY 6 GIB SUPPORT ;t t" 1 '- /' I GIS MAPPING; BETH YANDF... �l
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION I TEC11OLOGY -6 GIS SUPPORT I r '�! r - GIS MAPPING. BETI1 YANG, n1C1
GROWTI I MANAGEMENT DIVISIO M' TECI IOLOGY 6 GI6 SUPPORT `
•r r ,..a- •.,!.. GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION
i
� I,
SOO/q, of the 2010 , Median Income
of 472,300 for a 4 Pqr!$,o.n Kgq.se.shold
with a $300 Reoccurring Monthly
Debt - Affordable Mortgage Amount is, $55,967
(Units for East Naples, Ci,V(c Association)
PINE PINE [IDGE RD EXT
6'1 t ERD
<:1 I
.R
IDE. A1.PI11
rt
*4 PAIDIORD-:7
•
• DAMS BLVD .0
0— • - •-.
REEN BLVD TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 2,932
SINGLE FAMILY: 222
MULTI- FAMILY: 2,710
1-75
80% of. the 2010 . Median l,neqmq
04 $72l,,300 for ;k 4. Person Houses-hold
with a $400 Reoccarring Monthly
Debt.. - Affordable Mo-rtgage Amo-unt Is 41 - 41,496
U, In ts, f o. r East: Naples, Civic Assocta,tion),
a.
PINE RID -,E RD. PINE IDGE RD EXT
z
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 22,676
�Fj 'GREEN EE BLVD
SINGLE - FAMILY: 5,111
0 a
0 MULTI-FAMILY: 17,565
Am
2
0 . - - .. z I,- : - T------ 1-75
1;2,0 %' of the 201,0 Median lncq.mq-
of $72,,30o for a, 4 Per-sqn Hquass.hal.d
with a, $3.00 Re.occu.rring Monthly,
Debt - AffQrdabiq Mor-tgagq, Amount is $2$.6,143
(Units for East Naples. Civic A.s.s_o.C1atIon)
o.
is
R PINE RID E RD
PINE IDGE RD EXT
Z
z GREEN BLVD
ir TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS:
SINGLE FAMILY: 11,386
MULTI-FAMILY: 21,077
0 9
I
GOLDEN
z z •
T
FF tt <
z
7�
j
N
K
�KAIA A
%
SABAL PALM RD
SABAL PALM RD SABAL PALM RD
A 6,
M D ANATEE EE RD, stir `MAN EE RD,
< RAF 00
Ilk
ycl
Air
di
%
•
F
L7 I
46y,�'
MAPLEGEND
J
13 MAPLEGEND
77
East Naples Civic Associabon Bounda East Naples Civic P
ry East Naples Civic MAPLEGEND
Roads Association Boundary Association Boundary
Roads
Water Bod.es Roads
Water Bodies II
jL Water Bodies
RESIDENTIAL UNITStoxcludes mobile hmms)5 f" RESIDENTIAL NITS(excludes mobile horpos), 4E i,
RESIDE u
1* 4 Person Household with $300 Reoccurring
4 Perron Household with $300 922 mobile hqmcs)
Monthly Debt at 505/6 of the 2010 Monthly Debt at 80% of the 20G__ 4 Person Houral
Medan Income _Q, Median frmme Monthly Debt at 120% of the 2010
Median Income
N MAP 0 RD
RD-
N
7 _T
0 2 4
0 2 4 0 1 2
Miles 4
Miles 'A
1 Miles
GIS MA P PING: BETS YANG, AIGP
TECHOL 0 &GISSUPPORT GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AIGP GIS MAPPING: BETH YANG, AICP
GROWTIOiMYANAGrMENT DIVISION TECHOLOGY A GIS SUPPORT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION TECHOLOGY & GIS SUPPORT
GROWT14 MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Immokalee�
I
N
W +E
S
EDEN PARK ES
HIGHLANDS ES
IMMOKALEE HS
LAKE TRAFFORD ES
11 PINECREST ES
IMMOKALEE MS ( \
Ilf VILLAGE OAKS ES
i
i
I N NAiLES MS PALMETTO RIDGE HS (JPSN) CORKSCREW MS
IS CMTY PARK GULF COAST HS
OAK RIDGE MS CYPRESS PALM MS SABLE PALM ES
LAUREL OAK ES
iR REG PK (PETS)
VINEYARDS ES
4 BIG CYPRESS ES
BARRON COLLIER HS
GOLDEN GATE INTERMEDIATE
GOLDEN GATE MS
GOLDEN GATE HS MIKE DAVIS ES
GOLDEN TERR INTERMEDIATE
__":Y .,.._- v.__..
We have approximately 24,000 shelter spaces.
Not all shelters will be opened at the same time.
LELY HS Shelters are mainly opened based on the storm
PARKSIDE ES threat (intensity and direction).
I
I
Risk Shelters
RISK SHELTERS
r<all other values>
Name
BARRON COLLIER HS
BIG CYPRESS ES
CORKSCREW MS
CYPRESS PALM MS
EDEN PARK ES
GOLDEN GATE HS
GOLDEN GATE INTERMEDIATE
GOLDEN GATE MS
GOLDEN TERR INTERMEDIATE
GULF COAST HS
HIGHLANDS ES
IMMOKALEE HS
IMMOKALEE MS
LAKE TRAFFORD ES
LAUREL OAK ES
LELY HS
MIKE DAVIS ES
N COLLIER REG PK (PETS)
N NAPLES MS
OAK RIDGE MS
PALMETTO RIDGE HS (PSN)
PARKSIDE ES
PINECREST ES
SABLE PALM ES
VETERANS CMTY PARK
VILLAGE OAKS ES
VINEYARDS ES